UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20132016

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM              TO

Commission file number: 001-35479



MRC Global Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 



 



 

Delaware

20-5956993

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)



 

2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin,Fulbright Tower

1301  McKinney Street, Suite 31002300

Houston, Texas

77010

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

(877) 294-7574

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 



 



 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

 

Common Stock

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

(Title of class)



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☒    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.    

 



 

 

 



 

 

 

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer



 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No   ☒

The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MRC”. The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates was $2,$2091.370  millionbillion as of the close of trading as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on June 28, 2013.30, 2016. There were 101,917,87594,871,401 shares of the registrant’s common stock(excluding 552,901 unvested restricted shares), par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding as of February 14, 2014.10, 2017.


 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement relating to the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 



 

 



 

 

 

 

Page

 

PART I

 



 

 

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS



 

 

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS



 

 

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

1819 



 

 

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

1819 



 

 

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

1819 



 

 

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

1820 



 

 

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

1921 



 

 

 

PART II

 



 

 

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

2023 



 

 

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

2225 



 

 

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

2326 



 

 

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

3845 



 

 

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

3946 



 

 

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

4047 



 

 

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

4047 



 

 

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

4047 



 

 

 

PART III

 



 

 

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

4248 



 

 

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

4248 



 

 

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

4349 



 

 

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

4349 



 

 

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

4349 



 

 

 

PART IV

 



 

 

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

4450 





 

 


 


PART I

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references to “the Company”the “Company”, “MRC Global”, “MRC”, “we”, “us”, “our”, and the “registrant” refer to MRC Global Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

ITEM  1.BUSINESS

General

We are the largest global industrial distributor, based on sales, of pipe, valves and fittings (“PVF”) and related products and services to the energy industry based on sales and hold a leading position in our industry across each of the upstream (exploration, production and extraction of underground oil and natural gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and natural gas, natural gas utilities and the storage and distribution of oil and natural gas) and downstream (crude oil refining, petrochemical and chemical processing and general industrials) sectors. We offer more than 200,000230,000 SKUs, including an extensive array of PVF, oilfield supply, valve automation, measurement, instrumentation and other general and specialty industry supply products from our over 20,000global network of suppliers. Through our U.S., Canadian and International segments, we serve our more than 19,00017,000 customers through over 400approximately 300 service locations throughout North America, Europe, Asia and Australasia.locations. We are diversified by geography, the industry sectors we serve and the products we sell.

Our customers use the PVF and oilfield supplies that we supply in mission critical process applications that require us to provide a high degree of product knowledge, technical expertise and comprehensive value added services to our customers. We seek to provide best-in-class service and a one-stop shop for our customers by satisfying the most complex, multi-site needs of many of the largest companies in the energy and industrial sectors as their primary PVF supplier. We provide services such as product testing, manufacturer assessments, multiple daily deliveries, volume purchasing, inventory and zone store management and warehousing, technical support, training, just-in-time delivery, truck stocking, order consolidation, product tagging and system interfaces customized to customer and supplier specifications for tracking and replenishing inventory, engineering of control packages, and valve inspection and repair, which we believe result in deeply integrated customer relationships. We believe the critical role we play in our customers’ supply chain, together with our extensive product and services offering, broad global presence, customer-linked scalable information systems and efficient distribution capabilities, serve to solidify our long-standing customer relationships and drive our growth. As a result, we have an average relationship of over 2025 years with our 25 largest customers.

We have seen customer spending decline significantly beginning in late 2014 and continuing throughout all of 2015 and 2016 as a result of lower oil and natural gas prices.  In 2016, global customer spending fell by 27%, following a 21% decline in 2015, which brought spending to its lowest levels since 2009.  This marks the first time in nearly 30 years that our customers’ global spending has been down in consecutive years.  However, prominent exploration and production (“E&P”) spending surveys, which include many of our customers, forecast that 2017 spending will increase with more significant growth in 2018 and 2019.  We have benefited historically from several growth trends within the energy industry, including high levels of customer expansion and maintenance expenditures. Several factors have driven the long-term growth in spending, including underinvestment in North American energy infrastructure, production and capacity constraints and market expectations of future improvements in the oil, natural gas, refined products petrochemical and other industrialpetrochemical sectors. In addition, the productslonger term, we distribute are often usedbelieve carbon based energy will continue to play a critical role in extreme operating environments, leading tosupporting economic growth.  In the need for a regular replacement cycle. Approximately 72% of our sales are attributable to multi-year maintenance, repair and operations (“MRO”) arrangements. Our average annual retention rate for these contracts since 2000 is 95%. Depending on the nature of the activity, our MRO arrangements include both capital expenditures and operating expenses on the part of our customers.  Project activities, including facility expansions, exploration or new construction projects, are more commonly associated with a customer’s capital expenditures budget. These projects cannear term, however, customer spending will be more sensitive to global oil and natural gas prices and general economic conditions.  We mitigateAs such, we expect our exposurebusiness will continue to price volatility by limiting the lengthexperience periods of any price-protected contracts and we believe that we have the ability to pass price increases on to the marketplace.volatility.

MRC Global Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on November 20, 2006. Our principal executive office is located at 2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin1301 McKinney Street, Suite 3100,2300, Houston, Texas 77010. Our telephone number is (877) 294-7574. Our website address is www.mrcglobal.com. Information contained on our website is expressly not incorporated by reference into this document.

Business Strategy

Our goal is to grow our market position asAs an industrial distributor of PVF and related products to the energy industry. Ourindustry, our strategy is focused on pursuing growth.growth, margin enhancement and the development of long-term customer relationships within the markets we serve. Our strategic objectives are to increase our market share by executing global preferred supplier contracts completingwith new and existing customers, growing organically by maintaining a focus on our managed and targeted growth accounts, enhancing our product and service offerings, extending our global platform to major PVF energy markets through acquisitions, investing in technology systems and branch infrastructure to achieve improved operational excellence and optimizing our working capital.

We believe that global preferred supplier agreements allow us to better serve our customers’ needs and provide customers with a global platform in which to procure their products. The agreements vary by customer; however, in most cases, we are the preferred supplier, and while there are no minimum purchase requirements, we generally have a larger proportion of the customer’s spending in our product categories.  In addition, through system integration, we believe transactions with these customers can be more streamlined. We strive to add scope to these arrangements in various ways including adding geographies, product lines, inventory management and inventory logistics.

1


Our approach to expanding existing markets and accessing new markets is multifaceted.  We seek to expand our geographic footprint, pursue strategic acquisitions and growing organicallycultivate relationships with our existing customer base. We work with our customers to develop innovative supply chain solutions that enable us to consistently deliver the high quality products they need when they need them. By being a consistent and reliable supplier, we are able to maintain and grow our market share with both new and existing customers.

We continually broaden our product offering and supplier base.  Product expansion opportunities include alloy, chrome, stainless products, gaskets, seals and other industrial supply products. We remain focused on higher margin products such as the PVF market growsvalves, valve automation, measurement and instrumentation, as well as, by taking market share from competitors while simultaneously rebalancing our product mix to higher margin items.high alloy products.

We seek to achievealso target growth with our objectivesmidsized customers and diversification of our upstream and midstream customer bases. We do this through detailed account planning and by increasingeducating potential customers on the scope of geographies in whichofferings and logistics services we serve or product lines we offer within PVF, as well as, through the execution of integrated supply agreements, MRO arrangements and capital projects. provide.

Our current focus for acquisitionsacquisition strategy is focused on those businesses that will broaden our international geographic footprint, in certain energy intensive regions, or those that expand our product offerings, particularly in valves, valve automation, instrumentation, stainless and alloy.alloy or within a particular sector, such as downstream. We also consider “bolt-on” acquisitions that supplement our PVF leadership position.existing offerings. 

We seekinvest in information technology (“IT”) systems and branch infrastructure to extend our current product offeringsachieve improved operational excellence.  Our concept of operational excellence leverages standardized business processes to include pipe, fittings, flangesdeliver top tier safety performance, a consistent customer experience and other products (“PFF”), in our International segmenta lower overall cost to complete our global PVF offering.  

1


We continually add other products and new suppliers, including alloy, chrome, stainless products, gaskets, seals, safety and other industrial supply products, into our existing set of product offerings. We are focused on higher margin products such as valves, valve automation and high alloy products.serve.    

Operations

Our business is segregated into threefour geographical operating segments, our U.S., Eastern Region and Gulf Coast, U.S. Western Region, Canadian, and International operations. These segments represent our business of providing PVF and related products and services to the energy and industrial industries,industry, across each of the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors. For reporting purposes, our U.S. operating segments are aggregated based on their economic similarities.  Financial information regarding our reportable segments appears in “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 1314 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Our U.S. reportable segment represented approximately 76% of our consolidated revenuesrevenue in 2013.2016. We maintain distribution operations throughout the country with concentrations in the most active oil and natural gas producing regions. Our network is comprised of over 130107 branch locations, 89 distribution centers, 1314 valve automation service centers and over 9538 third-party pipe yards.

Our Canadian segment represented approximately 14%8% of our consolidated revenuesrevenue in 2013.2016. Our distribution operations extend throughout the western part of Canada with concentrations in Alberta and western Saskatchewan. In Canada, we have over 4027 branch locations, one distribution center, one valve automation service center and 2413 third-party pipe yards.

Our International segment represented approximately 10%16% of our consolidated revenuesrevenue in 2013.2016. This segment includes over 5556 branch locations located throughout Europe, Asia, Australasia and the Middle East with six distribution centers in the United Kingdom, Norway, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Arab Emirates and Australia. We also maintain 1312 valve automation service centers in Europe, Asia and AustraliaAustralia.

Safety.  In our business, safety is of paramount importance to us and to our customers.  Injuries and loss of life can have a terrible impact on our employees and the employees of our customers and our and their respective suppliers, contractors and business invitees at the work site as well as 10 pipe yardsany of their families.  In addition, unsafe conditions can cause or contribute to injuries, deaths, property damage and pollution that, in Australia,turn, can create significant liabilities for which insurance may not always be sufficient.  We are also subject to many safety regulatory standards such as those standards that the United Kingdom,U.S. Occupational Health and Norway.Safety Administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Transportation or state or foreign agencies of a similar nature may impose and enforce upon us.  Failure to meet those standards can result in fines, penalties or agency actions that can impose additional costs upon our business.  For all of these reasons, we and our customers demand high safety standards and practices to prevent the occurrence of unsafe conditions and any resulting harm.  Our operations, therefore, focus every day on the safety of our employees and those with whom we do business.  Our safety programs are designed to focus on the highest likely safety risks in our business and to build a culture of safe practices and continuous safety improvement for our employees, our customers and others with whom we do business or otherwise come into contact.

2


 

Products:  We distribute a complete line of PVF products, primarily used in specialized applications in the energy infrastructure sector. The products we distribute are used in the construction, maintenance, repair and overhaul of equipment used in extreme operating conditions such as high pressure, high/low temperature and highhighly corrosive and abrasive environments. We are required to carry significant amounts of inventory to meet the rapid delivery, often same day, requirements of our customers. The breadth and depth of our product offerings and our extensive global presence allow us to provide high levels of service to our customers. Due to our broad inventory coverage, we are able to fulfill more orders more quickly, including those with lower volume and specialty items, than we would be able to if we operated on a smaller scale or only at a local or regional level. Key product types are described below:

Valves, Automation, Measurement and Specialty Products.Instrumentation. Products offered includeProduct offering includes ball, butterfly, gate, globe, check, diaphragm, needle and plug valves, which are manufactured from cast steel, stainless/alloy steel, forged steel, carbon steel or cast and ductile iron. Valves are generally used in oilfield and industrial applications to control direction, velocity and pressure of fluids and gases within transmission networks. SpecialtyOther products include lined corrosion resistant piping systems, control valves, valve automation and top work components used for regulating flow and on/off service, measurement products and a wide range of steam and instrumentation products used in various process applications within our refinery, petrochemical and general industrial sectors.products.

Carbon Steel Fittings and Flanges and Stainless Steel and Alloy Pipe and Fittings.Flanges. Carbon steel fittings and flanges include carbon weld fittings, flanges and piping components used primarily to connect piping and valve systems for the transmission of various liquids and gases. These products are used across all the industries in which we operate.

Stainless Steel and Alloy Fittings, Flanges and Pipe. Stainless steel and alloy pipe and fittings include stainless, alloy and corrosion resistant pipe, tubing, fittings and flanges. These are used most often in the chemical, refining and power generation industries but are used across all of the sectors in which we operate. Alloy products are principally used in high-pressure, high-temperature and high-corrosion applications typically seen in process piping applications.

·

Gas Products. Natural gas distribution products include risers, meters, polyethylene pipe and fittings and various other components and industrial supplies used primarily in the distribution of natural gas to residential and commercial customers.

Line Pipe. Carbon line pipe is typically used in high-yield, high-stress and abrasive applications such as the gathering and transmission of oil, natural gas and phosphates. Line pipe is part of our tubular product category.

Oil Country Tubular Goods (“OCTG”). OCTG is part of our tubular product category. It includes casing (used for production and to line the well bore) and tubing pipe (used to extract oil or natural gas from wells) and is either classified as carbon or alloy depending on the grade of material.liquids (“NGL”).  

Other. Other includes natural gas distribution products, oilfield supplies and other industrial products such as mill and safety and electrical supplies. Natural gas distribution products include risers, meters, polyethylene pipe and fittings and various other components and industrial supplies used primarily in the distribution of natural gas to residential and commercial customers. We offer a comprehensive range of oilfield and industrial supplies and completion equipment, and products offered includeincluding high density polyethylene pipe, fittings and rods. Additionally, we can supply a wide range of specialized production equipment including meter runs, tanks and separators used in our upstream sector.

2


Services: We provide many of our customers with a comprehensive array of services including multiple deliveries each day, zone store management, valve tagging and significant system interfaces that directly tie the customer into our proprietary information systems. This allows us to interface with our customers’ IT systems with cross-referenced part numbers, streamlining the ordering process making it easier and provide an integrated supply service.more efficient to purchase our products. Such services strengthen our position with our customers as we become more integrated into the customer’s business andtheir supply chain and we are able to market a “total transaction value” solution rather than individual product prices.products.  

OurWe continue to invest in and expand our comprehensive information systems. In 2017, we will complete the transition of our International business to a single ERP platform.  These systems, which provide for customer and supplier electronic integrations, information sharing and e-commerce applications, including our MRCGO electronic catalog, further strengthen our ability to provide high levels of service to our customers. In 2013, we processed over 1.6 million electronic data interface (“EDI”) customer transactions. Our highly specialized implementation group focuses on the integration of our information systems and implementation of improved business processes with those of a new customer during the initiation phase. By maintaining a specialized team, we are able to utilize best practices to implement our systems and processes, thereby providing solutions to customers in a more organized, efficient and effective manner. This approach is valuable to large, multi-location customers who have demanding service requirements.

As major integrated and large independent energy companies have implemented efficiency initiatives to focus on their core business, many of these companies have begun outsourcing certain of their procurement and inventory management requirements. In response to these initiatives and to satisfy customer service requirements, we offer integrated supply services to customers who wish to outsource all or a part of the administrative burden associated with sourcing and managing PVF and other related products, and we also often have MRC Global employees on-site full-time at many customer locations. Our integrated supply group offers procurement-related services, physical warehousing services, product quality assurance and inventory ownership and analysis services.

Suppliers: We source the products we distribute from a global network of suppliers in over 3540 countries. We have over 100 dedicated supply chain management employees that handle purchasing.  Our suppliers benefit from access to our large, diversified customer base and, by consolidating customer orders allowing for manufacturing efficiencies, we benefit from stronger purchasing power and preferred vendor programs. Our purchases from our 25 largest suppliers in 20132016 approximated 43%37% of our total purchases, with our single largest supplier constituting approximately 6%. We are the largest customer for many of our suppliers, and we source a significant the

3


majority of the products we distribute directly from the manufacturer. The remainder of the products we distribute are sourced from manufacturer representatives, trading companies and, in some instances, other distributors.

We believe our customers and suppliers recognize us as an industry leader in part due to the quality of products we supply and for the formal processes we use to evaluate vendor performance. This vendor assessment process is referred to as the MRC Global Supplier Registration Process, which involves employing individuals, certified by the International Registry of Certificated Auditors, who specialize in conducting on-site assessments of our manufacturers as well as monitoring and evaluating the quality of goods produced. The result of this process is the MRC Global approved manufacturer’s listing (“AML”). Products from the manufacturers on this list are supplied across many of the industries we support. Given that many of our largest customers, especially those in our downstream sector, maintain their own formal AML listing, we are recognized as an important source of information sharing with our key customers regarding the results of our on-site assessment. For this reason, together with our commitment to promote high quality products that bring the best overall value to our customers, we often become the preferred provider of AML products to these customers. Many of our customers regularly collaborate with us regarding specific manufacturer performance, our own experience with vendors’ products and the results of our on-site manufacturer assessments. The emphasis placed on the MRC Global AML by both our customers and suppliers helps secure our central and critical position in the global PVF supply chain.

We utilize a variety of freight carriers in addition to our corporate truck fleet to ensure timely and efficient delivery of our products. With respect to deliveries of products from us to our customers, or our outbound needs, we utilize both our corporate fleet and third-party transportation providers. We utilize third parties for approximately 19% of our outbound deliveries. With respect to shipments of products from suppliers to us, or our inbound needs, we principally use third-party carriers.

Sales and Marketing: We distribute our products to a wide variety of end-users, withand we have operations in 1922 countries and direct sales into over 45100 countries around the world. We have approximately 2,300 operations personnel around the world.  Our broad inventory offering and distribution network and customer base allowallows us to capitalize onserve large global customers with consistent, high-quality service that is unrivaled in our extensive inventory offering.industry. Local relationships, depth of inventory, responsive service and timely delivery are critical to the sales process in the PVF distribution industry. Our sales efforts are customer and product driven and provide a system that is more responsive to changing customer and product needs than a traditional, fully centralized structure.

Our sales model applies a two-pronged approach to address both regional and national markets. Regional sales teams are based in our core geographic regions and are complemented by a global accounts sales team organized by sector or product expertise and focused on large regional, national or global customers. These sales teams are then supported by groups with additional specific service or product expertise, including integrated supply, valves, valve automation, corrosion resistant products, measurement equipment and implementation. Our overall sales force is then internally divided into outside and inside sales forces.

3


Our over 500400 account managers and outside sales representatives develop relationships with prospective and existing customers in an effort to better understand their needs and to increase the number of our products specified or approved by a given customer. Outside sales representatives may be branch outside sales representatives, focused on customer relationships in specific geographies, or technical outside sales representatives, who focus on specific products and provide detailed technical support to customers. Internationally, for valve sales, the majority of our sales force is comprised of qualified engineers who are able to meet complex customer requirements, select optimal solutions from a range of products to increase customers’ efficiency and lower total product lifecycle costs.

To address the needs of our customer base, ourOur inside sales force of over 1,000800 customer service representatives is responsible for processing orders generated by new and existing customers as well as by our outside sales force. The customer service representatives develop order packages based on specific customer needs, interface with manufacturers to determine product availability, ensure on-time delivery and establish pricing of materials and services based on guidelines and predetermined metrics that management establishes.

Seasonality: Our business normally experiences mild seasonal effects as demand for the products we distribute is generally higher during the months of August, September and October. Demand for the products we distribute during the months of November and December and early in the year generally tends to be lower due to a lower level of activity near the end of the calendar year in the industry sectors we serve and due to winter weather disruptions. In addition, certain exploration and production (“E&P”) activities, primarily in Canada, typically experience a springtime reduction due to seasonal thaws and regulatory restrictions, limiting the ability of drilling rigs to operate effectively during these periods.

Customers: Our principal customers are companies active in the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors of the energy industry as well as in other industrial and energy sectors.industry. Due to the demanding operating conditions in the energy industry, high costs and safety risks associated with equipment failure, customers prefer highly reliable products and vendors with established qualifications, reputation and experience. As our PVF products typically are mission critical and represent a fraction of the total cost of a given project, our customers often place a premium on service and high reliability given the high cost to them of maintenance or new project delays. We strive to build long-term relationships with our customers by maintaining our reputation as a supplier of high-quality,  efficient and reliable products and value-added services and solutions.

4


We have a diverse customer base of over 19,000 active17,000 customers. We are not dependent on any one customer or group of customers. A majority of our customers are offered terms of net 30 days (payment is due within 30 days of the date of the invoice). Customers generally have the right to return products we have sold, subject to certain conditions and limitations, although returns have historically been immaterial to our sales. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012,2016, our 25 largest customers represented approximately half52% of our total sales, with our single largest customer constituting approximately 6%8%. For many of our largest customers, we are often their sole or primary PVF provider by sector or geography, their largest or second largest supplier in aggregate or, in certain instances, the sole provider for their upstream, midstream and downstream procurement needs. We believe that many customers for which we are not the exclusive or comprehensive U.S. sole source PVF provider will continue to reduce their number of suppliers in an effort to reduce costs and administrative burdens and focus on their core operations. As such, we believe these customers will seek to select PVF distributors with the most extensive product offering and broadest geographic presence. Furthermore, we believe our business will benefit as companies in the energy industry continue to consolidate and the larger, resulting companies look to larger distributors such as ourselves as their sole or primary source PVF provider.

Backlog: We determine backlog by the amount of unshipped customer orders, either specific or general in nature, (including orders held under pipe programs), which the customer may revise or cancel in certain instances.  OurThe table below details our backlog atby segment (in millions): 



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2016*

 

2015*

 

2014*

U.S.

$              472

 

$              305

 

$              610

Canada

36 

 

34 

 

66 

International

241 

 

161 

 

260 



$              749

 

$              500

 

$              936

*Amounts excluded U.S. OCTG backlog of $0 million, $42 million, and $157 million for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.  We disposed of our U.S. OCTG product line in February 2016.

Approximately 28% of our December 31, 20132016 ending backlog was $758 million including $470 million, $90 million and $198 millionassociated with one customer in our US, Canadian and International segments, respectively. Our backlog at December 31, 2012 was $664 million including $455 million, $62 million and $147 million in our US, Canadian and International segments, respectively.U.S. segment as the result of a significant ongoing customer project.  There can be no assurance that the backlog amounts will ultimately be realized as revenue or that we will earn a profit on the backlog of orders, but we expect that substantially all of the sales in our backlog will be realized in 2014.2017.

Competition: We are the largest PVF distributor to the energy industry based on sales. The broad PVF distribution industry is fragmented and includes large, nationally recognized distributors, major regional distributors and many smaller local distributors. The principal methods of competition include offering prompt local service, fulfillment capability, breadth of product and service offerings, price and total costs to the customer. Our competitors include nationally recognizedlarge PVF distributors, such as National Oilwell Distribution (a division of National Oilwell Varco, Inc.),DistributionNOW, Ferguson Enterprises (a subsidiary of Wolseley, plc), Marubeni-Itochu, and Sumitomo,Van Leeuwen, FloWorks, Lockwood International, several large regional or product-specific competitors and many local, family-owned and privately held PVF distributors.

 

4


Employees: Including our recent acquisitions, weWe have approximately  5,1503,500 employees of which 214252 employees belong to a union and are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We also have 7416 employees in Australia that are not members of a union but are covered by union negotiated agreements. We consider our relationships with our employees to be good.

For a breakdown of our annual revenuesrevenue by geography, see “Note 13—14—Segment, Geographic and Product Line Information” to the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013.2016.  

Environmental Matters

We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local, foreign and provincial environmental, health and safety laws, regulations and permitting requirements (collectively, “environmental laws”), including those governing the discharge of pollutants or hazardous substances into the air, soil or water, the generation, handling, use, management, storage and disposal of, or exposure to, hazardous substances and wastes, the responsibility to investigate, remediate, monitor and clean up contamination and occupational health and safety. Fines and penalties may be imposed for non-compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety requirements and the failure to have or to comply with the terms and conditions of required permits. following:

·

the discharge of pollutants or hazardous substances into the air, soil or water,

·

the generation, handling, use, management, storage and disposal of, or exposure to, hazardous substances and wastes,

·

the responsibility to investigate, remediate, monitor and clean up contamination and

·

occupational health and safety.

Historically, the costs to comply with environmental and health and safety requirementslaws have not been material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We are not aware of any pending environmental compliance or remediation matters that, in the opinion of management, are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our business, financial position or results of operations or cash flows. However, theour failure by us to comply with applicable environmental health and safety requirementslaws could result in fines, penalties, enforcement actions, employee, neighbor or other third-party claims for property damage and personal injury, requirements to clean up property or to pay for the costs of cleanup

5


or regulatory or judicial orders requiring corrective measures, including the installation of pollution control equipment or remedial actions.

Under certainCertain environmental laws, and regulations, such as the U.S. federal Superfundsuperfund law or its state or foreign equivalents, may impose the obligation to investigate, remediate, monitor and clean up contamination at a facility may be imposed on current and former owners, lessees or operators or on persons who may have sent waste to that facility for disposal.  Liability under theseThese environmental laws and regulations may be imposedimpose liability without regard to fault or to the legality of the activities giving rise to the contamination. Although we are not aware of any active litigation against us under the U.S. federal Superfundsuperfund law or its state or foreign equivalents, we have identified contamination has been identified at several of our current and former facilities, and we have incurred and will continue to incur costs to investigate, remediate, monitor and clean up these conditions. Moreover, we may incur liabilities in connection with environmental conditions currently unknown to us relating to our prior, existing or future owned or leased sites or operations or those of predecessor companies whose liabilities we may have assumed or acquired. We believe that indemnities contained in certain of our acquisition agreements may cover certain environmental conditions existing at the time of the acquisition subject to certain terms, limitations and conditions. However, if these indemnification provisions terminate or if the indemnifying parties do not fulfill their indemnification obligations, we may be subject to liability with respect to the environmental matters that those indemnification provisions address.

In addition,Certain governments at the international, national, regional and state level are at various stages of considering or implementing treaties and environmental healthlaws that could limit emissions of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, associated with the burning of fossil fuels. For instance, in September 2016, the United States was one of 175 countries to ratify the Paris Agreement, which requires member countries to review and safetydetermine their respective goals towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  Certain states and regions have also adopted or are considering environmental laws that impose overall caps or taxes on greenhouse gas emissions from certain sectors or facility categories or mandate the increased use of electricity from renewable energy sources. It is not possible to predict how new environmental laws to address greenhouse gas emissions would impact our business or that of our customers, but these laws and regulations could impose costs on us or negatively impact the market for the products we distribute and, consequently, our business. 

In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has implemented regulations that require permits for and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions for certain categories of emission sources.  Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement, the EPA in October 2015 published final greenhouse gas emissions standards, known as New Source Performance Standards, for new power plants, which state and industry petitioners challenged in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, which will hear oral argument in April 2017. In a separate rulemaking, the EPA also published final emission guidelines for existing power plants in October 2015 (commonly known as the “Clean Power Plan”), implementation of which the U.S. Supreme Court stayed pending disposition of a challenge to those rules in the DC Circuit, which will hear oral argument in September 2017.  In anticipation of and in response to these regulations, United States electric producers have been switching from coal to natural gas as a cleaner burning fuel source.  This replacement of natural gas for coal has benefitted our business as our customers include natural gas producers.

The greenhouse gas settlement agreement also calls for standards for greenhouse gas emissions from oil refineries; however the EPA has not proposed any standards to date.  The EPA did, however, promulgate standards for greenhouse gas emissions from methane, and volatile organic compound emissions from oil and natural gas well sites and facilities in June 2016, which state and industry petitioners have also challenged.

In addition, federal, state, local, foreign and provincial governments have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, environmental laws that could impose more stringent permitting; disclosure; wastewater and other waste disposal; greenhouse gas, ethane or volatile organic compound control, leak detection and repair requirements;  and well construction and testing requirements on our customers’ hydraulic fracturing. 

Environmental laws applicable to our business and the business of our customers, including environmental laws regulating the energy industry, and the interpretation or enforcement of these environmental laws, and regulations, are constantly evolving andevolving; it is impossible to predict accurately the effect that changes in these environmental laws, and regulations, or their interpretation or enforcement, may have upon our business, financial condition or results of operations. Should environmental laws, and regulations, or their interpretation or enforcement, become more stringent, our costs, or the costs of our customers, could increase, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In particular, legislationJanuary 2017, a new U.S. President took office and regulations limiting emissionsnew U.S. Congress was seated.  Until specific environmental laws are enacted, executive actions are taken or federal regulatory action is taken, it is unclear what impact the policies of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide associated with the burning of fossil fuels, are at various stages of considerationnew President and implementation, at the international, national, regional and state levels. In 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which established a binding set of emission targets for greenhouse gases, became bindingCongress will have on the countries that ratified it. Attention is now focused on the development of a post-2012 international policy framework to guide international action to address climate change when the Kyoto Protocol expired in 2012. Certain states and regions have adopted or are considering legislation orforegoing environmental regulation imposing overall caps or taxes on greenhouse gas emissions from certain sectors or facility categories or mandating the increased use of electricity from renewable energy sources. Similar legislation has been proposed at the federal level. In addition, the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has implemented regulations that require permits forlevel and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions for certain categories of emission sources, the most recent of which became effective in August 2012. Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement, the EPA is in the process of finalizing greenhouse gas emissions standards, known as New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”), for new power plantswhat actions state governments and plans to propose and issue NSPS for existing power plants by June 2014 and finalize them a year later.  The settlement agreement also calls for NSPS for greenhouse gas emissions from oil refineries; however the EPA has not proposed such NSPS to date. NSPS for other oil refinery emissions were issued by the EPA pursuant to the settlement agreement in September 2012 and became effective in November 2012 with minor amendments effective in December 2013. These laws and regulations could negatively impact the market for the products we distribute and, consequently, our business.

environmental agencies may take.

56


 

In addition, federal, state, local, foreign and provincial laws, regulations and permitting requirements have been adopted or are being considered that could impose more stringent permitting, disclosure, wastewater and other waste disposal and well construction and testing requirements on hydraulic fracturing, a practice involving the injection of water containing certain other substances into rock formations (after perforating the formation with explosive charges) to stimulate production of hydrocarbons, particularly natural gas, from shale basin regions. Other states and the federal government are considering regulating this practice. These regulations include a variety of well construction, set back, wastewater disposal, emissions, baseline sampling, operational and disclosure requirements limiting how fracturing can be performed and requiring various degrees of disclosures regarding the contents of chemicals injected into the rock formations, as well as moratoria on all hydraulic fracturing activity. Any increased federal, regional or state regulation of hydraulic fracturing could reduce the demand for our products in these regions.

Exchange Rate Information

In this report, unless otherwise indicated, foreign currency amounts are converted into U.S. dollar amounts at the exchange rates in effect on December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 for balance sheet figures. Income statement figures are converted on a monthly basis, using each month’s average conversion rate.

Available Information

Our website is located at www.mrcglobal.com. We make available free of charge on or through our internet website our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file suchthis material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

 

67


 


ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risk factors as well as the other risks and uncertainties contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K or in our other SEC filings.  The occurrence of one or more of these risks or uncertainties could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context expressly requires a different reading, when we state that a factor could “adversely affect us”, have a “material���material adverse effect”, “adversely affect our business” and similar expressions, we mean that the factor could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition,  operating results and cash flows. Information contained in this section may be considered “forward-looking statements”. See “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of certain qualifications regarding forward looking statements.

Risks Related to Our Business

Decreased capital and other expenditures in the energy industry, which can result from decreased oil and natural gas prices, among other things, can adversely impact our customers’ demand for our products and our revenue.

A large portion of our revenue depends upon the level of capital and operating expenditures in the oil and natural gas industry, including capital and other expenditures in connection with exploration, drilling, production, gathering, transportation, refining and processing operations. Demand for the products we distribute and services we provide is particularly sensitive to the level of exploration, development and production activity of, and the corresponding capital and other expenditures by, oil and natural gas companies. A material decline in oil or natural gas prices, inability to access capital, and consolidation within the industry could all depress levels of exploration, development and production activity and, therefore, could lead to a decrease in our customers’ capital and other expenditures. If our customers’ expenditures decline, our business will suffer.

Volatile oil and gas prices affect demand for our products.

PricesAs evidenced by the decline of oil prices from late 2014 through 2016, prices for oil and natural gas are subject to large fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty and a variety of other factors that are beyond our control. Any sustained decrease in capital expenditures in the oil and natural gas industry could have a material adverse effect on us.

Many factors affect the supply of and demand for energy and, therefore, influence oil and natural gas prices, including:

the level of domestic and worldwide oil and natural gas production and inventories;

the level of drilling activity and the availability of attractive oil and natural gas field prospects, which governmental actions may affect, such as regulatory actions or legislation, or other restrictions on drilling, including those related to environmental concerns (e.g., a temporary moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico following a rig accident or oil spill);concerns;

the discovery rate of new oil and natural gas reserves and the expected cost of developing new reserves;

the actual cost of finding and producing oil and natural gas;

depletion rates;

domestic and worldwide refinery overcapacity or undercapacity and utilization rates;

the availability of transportation infrastructure and refining capacity;

increases in the cost of products and services that the oil and gas industry uses, such as those that we provide, which may result from increases in the cost of raw materials such as steel;

shifts in end-customer preferences toward fuel efficiency and the use of natural gas;

the economic or political attractiveness of alternative fuels, such as coal, hydrocarbon, wind, solar energy and biomass-based fuels;

increases in oil and natural gas prices or historically high oil and natural gas prices, which could lower demand for oil and natural gas products;

worldwide economic activity including growth in non-OECD countries, including (among others) China and India;

interest rates and the cost of capital;

national government policies, including government policies that could nationalize or expropriate oil and natural gas exploration, production, refining or transportation assets;

the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to set and maintain production levels and prices for oil;

the impact of armed hostilities, or the threat or perception of armed hostilities;

7


environmental regulation;

8


technological advances;

global weather conditions and natural disasters;

currency fluctuations; and

tax policies.

Oil and natural gas prices have been and are expected to remain volatile. This volatility has historically caused oil and natural gas companies to change their strategies and expenditure levels from year to year. We have experienced in the past, and we will likely experience in the future, significant fluctuations in operating results based on these changes. In particular, volatility in the oil and natural gas sectors could adversely affect our business.

General economic conditions may adversely affect our business.

U.S. and global general economic conditions affect many aspects of our business, including demand for the products we distribute and the pricing and availability of supplies. General economic conditions and predictions regarding future economic conditions also affect our forecasts. A decrease in demand for the products we distribute or other adverse effects resulting from an economic downturn may cause us to fail to achieve our anticipated financial results. General economic factors beyond our control that affect our business and customers include interest rates, recession, inflation, deflation, customer credit availability, consumer credit availability, consumer debt levels, performance of housing markets, energy costs, tax rates and policy, unemployment rates, commencement or escalation of war or hostilities, the threat or possibility of war, terrorism or other global or national unrest, political or financial instability and other matters that influence our customers’ spending. Increasing volatility in financial markets may cause these factors to change with a greater degree of frequency or increase in magnitude. In addition, worldwide economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows going forward. Continued adverse economic conditions would have an adverse effect on us.

We may be unable to compete successfully with other companies in our industry.

We sell products and services in very competitive markets. In some cases, we compete with large companies with substantial resources. In other cases, we compete with smaller regional players that may increasingly be willing to provide similar products and services at lower prices. Competitive actions, such as price reductions, consolidation in the industry, improved delivery and other actions, could adversely affect our revenue and earnings. We could experience a material adverse effect to the extent that our competitors are successful in reducing our customers’ purchases of products and services from us. Competition could also cause us to lower our prices, which could reduce our margins and profitability. Furthermore, consolidation in our industry could heighten the impacts of the competition on our business and results of operations discussed above, particularly if consolidation results in competitors with stronger financial and strategic resources and could also result in increases to the prices we are required to pay for acquisitions we may make in the future.

Demand for the products we distribute could decrease if the manufacturers of those products were to sell a substantial amount of goods directly to end users in the sectors we serve.

Historically, users of PVF and related products have purchased certain amounts of these products through distributors and not directly from manufacturers. If customers were to purchase the products that we sell directly from manufacturers, or if manufacturers sought to increase their efforts to sell directly to end users, we could experience a significant decrease in profitability. These or other developments that remove us from, or limit our role in, the distribution chain, may harm our competitive position in the marketplace, reduce our sales and earnings and adversely affect our business.

We may experience unexpected supply shortages.

We distribute products from a wide variety of manufacturers and suppliers. Nevertheless, in the future we may have difficulty obtaining the products we need from suppliers and manufacturers as a result of unexpected demand or production difficulties that might extend lead times. Also, products may not be available to us in quantities sufficient to meet our customer demand. Our inability to obtain products from suppliers and manufacturers in sufficient quantities, or at all, could adversely affect our product offerings and our business.

We may experience cost increases from suppliers, which we may be unable to pass on to our customers.

In the future, we may face supply cost increases due to, among other things, unexpected increases in demand for supplies, decreases in production of supplies, or increases in the cost of raw materials, transportation, changes in exchange rates or transportation.the imposition of import taxes or tariff on imported products. Any inability to pass supply price increases on to our customers could have a material adverse effect on us. For example, we may be unable to pass increased supply costs on to our customers because significant amounts of our sales are derived from stocking program arrangements, contracts and MRO

8


maintenance and repair arrangements, which provide our customers time limited price protection, which may obligate us to sell products at a set price for a specific period. In addition, if

9


supply costs increase, our customers may elect to purchase smaller amounts of products or may purchase products from other distributors. While we may be able to work with our customers to reduce the effects of unforeseen price increases because of our relationships with them, we may not be able to reduce the effects of the cost increases. In addition, to the extent that competition leads to reduced purchases of products or services from us or a reduction of our prices, and these reductions occur concurrently with increases in the prices for selected commodities which we use in our operations, including steel, nickel and molybdenum, the adverse effects described above would likely be exacerbated and could result in a prolonged downturn in profitability.

We do not have contracts with most of our suppliers. The loss of a significant supplier would require us to rely more heavily on our other existing suppliers or to develop relationships with new suppliers. Such a loss may have an adverse effect on our product offerings and our business.

Given the nature of our business, and consistent with industry practice, we do not have contracts with most of our suppliers. We generally make our purchases through purchase orders. Therefore, most of our suppliers have the ability to terminate their relationships with us at any time. Approximately 43%37% of our total purchases during the year ended December 31, 20132016 were from our 25 largest suppliers. Although we believe there are numerous manufacturers with the capacity to supply the products we distribute, the loss of one or more of our major suppliers could have an adverse effect on our product offerings and our business. Such a loss would require us to rely more heavily on our other existing suppliers or develop relationships with new suppliers, which may cause us to pay higher prices for products due to, among other things, a loss of volume discount benefits currently obtained from our major suppliers.

Price reductions by suppliers of products that we sell could cause the value of our inventory to decline. Also, these price reductions could cause our customers to demand lower sales prices for these products, possibly decreasing our margins and profitability on sales to the extent that we purchased our inventory of these products at the higher prices prior to supplier price reductions.

The value of our inventory could decline as a result of manufacturer price reductions with respect to products that we sell. There is no assurance that a substantial decline in product prices would not result in a write-down of our inventory value. Such a write-down could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Also, decreases in the market prices of products that we sell could cause customers to demand lower sales prices from us. These price reductions could reduce our margins and profitability on sales with respect to the lower-priced products. Reductions in our margins and profitability on sales could have a material adverse effect on us.

A substantial decrease in the price of steel could significantly lower our gross profit or cash flow.

We distribute many products manufactured from steel. As a result, the price and supply of steel can affect our business and, in particular, our tubular product category. When steel prices are lower, the prices that we charge customers for products may decline, which affects our gross profit and cash flow. At times pricing and availability of steel can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control, including general domestic and international economic conditions, labor costs, sales levels, competition, consolidation of steel producers, fluctuations in and the costs of raw materials necessary to produce steel, steel manufacturers’manufacturers��� plant utilization levels and capacities, import duties and tariffs and currency exchange rates. Increases in manufacturing capacity for the tubular products could put pressure on the prices we receive for our tubular products. When steel prices decline, customer demands for lower prices and our competitors’ responses to those demands could result in lower sales prices and, consequently, lower gross profit and cash flow.

If steel prices rise, we may be unable to pass along the cost increases to our customers.

We maintain inventories of steel products to accommodate the lead time requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we purchase steel products in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon historic buying practices, contracts with customers and market conditions. Our commitments to purchase steel products are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. If steel prices increase between the time we order steel products and the time of delivery of the products to us, our suppliers may impose surcharges that require us to pay for increases in steel prices during the period. Demand for the products we distribute, the actions of our competitors and other factors will influence whether we will be able to pass on steel cost increases and surcharges to our customers, and we may be unsuccessful in doing so.

910


 

We do not have long-term contracts or agreements with many of our customers. The contracts and agreements that we do have generally do not commit our customers to any minimum purchase volume. The loss of a significant customer may have a material adverse effect on us.

Given the nature of our business, and consistent with industry practice, we do not have long-term contracts with many of our customers. In addition, our contracts, including our MROmaintenance, repair and operations (“MRO”) contracts, generally do not commit our customers to any minimum purchase volume. Therefore, a significant number of our customers, including our MRO customers, may terminate their relationships with us or reduce their purchasing volume at any time. Furthermore, the long-term customer contracts that we do have are generally terminable without cause on short notice. Our 25 largest customers represented approximately half52% of our sales for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016. The products that we may sell to any particular customer depend in large part on the size of that customer’s capital expenditure budget in a particular year and on the results of competitive bids for major projects. Consequently, a customer that accounts for a significant portion of our sales in one fiscal year may represent an immaterial portion of our sales in subsequent fiscal years. The loss of a significant customer, or a substantial decrease in a significant customer’s orders, may have an adverse effect on our sales and revenue.  In addition, we are subject to customer audit clauses in many of our multi-year contracts. If we are not able to provide the proper documentation or support for invoices per the contract terms, we may be subject to negotiated settlements with our major customers.

Changes in our customer and product mix could cause our gross profit percentage to fluctuate.

From time to time, we may experience changes in our customer mix or in our product mix. Changes in our customer mix may result from geographic expansion, daily selling activities within current geographic markets and targeted selling activities to new customer segments. Changes in our product mix may result from marketing activities to existing customers and needs communicated to us from existing and prospective customers. If customers begin to require more lower-margin products from us and fewer higher-margin products, our business, results of operations and financial condition may suffer.

Customer credit risks could result in losses.

The concentration of our customers in the energy industry may impact our overall exposure to credit risk as customers may be similarly affected by prolonged changes in economic and industry conditions. Further, laws in some jurisdictions in which we operate could make collection difficult or time consuming. In addition, in times when commodity prices are low, our customers with higher debt levels may not have the ability to pay their debts.  We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and do not generally require collateral in support of our trade receivables. While we maintain reserves for expected credit losses, we cannot assure these reserves will be sufficient to meet write-offs of uncollectible receivables or that our losses from such receivables will be consistent with our expectations.

We may be unable to successfully execute or effectively integrate acquisitions.

One of our key operating strategies is to selectively pursue acquisitions, including large scale acquisitions, to continue to grow and increase profitability. However, acquisitions, particularly of a significant scale, involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including intense competition for suitable acquisition targets, the potential unavailability of financial resources necessary to consummate acquisitions in the future, increased leverage due to additional debt financing that may be required to complete an acquisition, dilution of our stockholders’ net current book value per share if we issue additional equity securities to finance an acquisition, difficulties in identifying suitable acquisition targets or in completing any transactions identified on sufficiently favorable terms, assumption of undisclosed or unknown liabilities and the need to obtain regulatory or other governmental approvals that may be necessary to complete acquisitions. In addition, any future acquisitions may entail significant transaction costs and risks associated with entry into new markets.

Even when acquisitions are completed, integration of acquired entities can involve significant difficulties, such as:

failure to achieve cost savings or other financial or operating objectives with respect to an acquisition;

strain on the operational and managerial controls and procedures of our business, and the need to modify systems or to add management resources;

difficulties in the integration and retention of customers or personnel and the integration and effective deployment of operations or technologies;

amortization of acquired assets, which would reduce future reported earnings;

possible adverse short-term effects on our cash flows or operating results;

diversion of management’s attention from the ongoing operations of our business;

integrating personnel with diverse backgrounds and organizational cultures;

coordinating sales and marketing functions;

10


failure to obtain and retain key personnel of an acquired business; and

11


assumption of known or unknown material liabilities or regulatory non-compliance issues.

Failure to manage these acquisition growth risks could have an adverse effect on us.

Our significant indebtedness may affect our ability to operate our business, and this could have a material adverse effect on us.

We have now and will likely continue to have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had total debt outstanding of $986.8 $414million borrowingand excess availability of $776.9$425 million under our credit facilities and total liquidity (borrowing capacity plus cash on hand) of $802.1 million.facilities. We may incur significant additional indebtedness in the future. If new indebtedness is added to our current indebtedness, the risks described below could increase. Our significant level of indebtedness could have important consequences, such as:

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our working capital, acquisitions, expenditures, debt service requirements or other general corporate purposes;

limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service debt;

limiting our ability to compete with other companies who are not as highly leveraged;

subjecting us to restrictive financial and operating covenants in the agreements governing our and our subsidiaries’ long-term indebtedness;

exposing us to potential events of default (if not cured or waived) under financial and operating covenants contained in our or our subsidiaries’ debt instruments that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition;

increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in general economic conditions or in pricing of our products; and

limiting our ability to react to changing market conditions in our industry and in our customers’ industries.

In addition, borrowings under our credit facilities bear interest at variable rates. If market interest rates increase, the variable-rate debt will create higher debt service requirements, which could adversely affect our cash flow. Our interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20132016 was $60.7$35 million.

Our ability to make scheduled debt payments, to refinance our obligations with respect to our indebtedness and to fund capital and non-capital expenditures necessary to maintain the condition of our operating assets, properties and systems software, as well as to provide capacity for the growth of our business, depends on our financial and operating performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, competitive, legal and other factors. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and future borrowings may not be available to us under our credit facilities in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may seek to sell assets to fund our liquidity needs but may not be able to do so. We may also need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

In addition, we are and will be subject to covenants contained in agreements governing our present and future indebtedness. These covenants include and will likely include restrictions on:

investments;

prepayment of certain indebtedness;

the granting of liens;

the incurrence of additional indebtedness;

asset sales;

the making of fundamental changes;

transactions with affiliates; and

the payment of dividends.

11


In addition, any defaults under our credit facilities, including our global asset-based lending facility (“Global ABL Facility”), our senior secured term loan B (“Term Loan”) or our other debt could trigger cross defaults under other or future credit agreements and may permit acceleration of our other indebtedness. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we cannot be certain that we will have sufficient funds available to pay the accelerated indebtedness or that we will have the ability to refinance the accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to us or at all. For a description of our credit facilities and indebtedness, see “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

12


We are a holding company and depend upon our subsidiaries for our cash flow.

We are a holding company. Our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own substantially all of our assets. Consequently, our cash flow and our ability to meet our obligations or to pay dividends or make other distributions in the future will depend upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries and our subsidiaries’ payment of funds to us in the form of dividends, tax sharing payments or otherwise. In addition, McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our direct subsidiary and the primary obligor under our Global ABL Facility and our Term Loan, is also dependent to a significant extent on the cash flow of its subsidiaries to meet its debt service obligations.

The ability of our subsidiaries to make any payments to us will depend on their earnings, the terms of their current and future indebtedness, tax considerations and legal and contractual restrictions on the ability to make distributions. In particular, our subsidiaries’ credit facilities currently impose significant limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us and consequently our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. Subject to limitations in our credit facilities, our subsidiaries may also enter into additional agreements that contain covenants prohibiting them from distributing or advancing funds or transferring assets to us under certain circumstances, including to pay dividends.

Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities. Any right that we have to receive any assets of or distributions from any of our subsidiaries upon the bankruptcy, dissolution, liquidation or reorganization, or to realize proceeds from the sale of their assets, will be junior to the claims of that subsidiary’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of debt that the subsidiary issued.

Changes in our credit profile may affect our relationship with our suppliers, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.

Changes in our credit profile may affect the way our suppliers view our ability to make payments and may induce them to shorten the payment terms of their invoices particularly givenif they perceive our high level of outstanding indebtedness.indebtedness to be high. Given the large dollar amounts and volume of our purchases from suppliers, a change in payment terms may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to make payments to our suppliers and, consequently, may have a material adverse effect on us.

If tariffs and duties on imports into the U.S. of line pipe, OCTG or certain of the other products that we sell are lifted or imposed, we could have too many of these products in inventory competing against less expensive imports.imports or conversely pay higher prices for products that we sell.  

U.S. law currently imposes tariffs and duties on imports from certain foreign countries of line pipe and OCTG and, to a lesser extent, on imports of certain other products that we sell. If these tariffs and duties are lifted or reduced or if the level of these imported products otherwise increases,increase, and our U.S. customers accept these imported products, we could be materially and adversely affected to the extent that we would then have higher-cost products in our inventory or experience lower prices and margins due to increased supplies of these products that could drive down prices and margins. If prices of these products were to decrease significantly, we might not be able to profitably sell these products, and the value of our inventory would decline. In addition, significant price decreases could result in a significantly longer holding period for some of our inventory.  Conversely, if tariffs and duties are imposed on imports from certain foreign countries of products that we sell, we could be required to pay higher prices for our products.  Demand for the products we distribute, the actions of our competitors and other factors will influence whether we will be able to pass on additional cost increases to our customers, and we may be unsuccessful in doing so.

We are subject to strict environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that may lead to significant liabilities and negatively impact the demand for our products.

We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local, foreign and provincial environmental, health and safety laws;laws, regulations and permitting requirements (collectively, “environmental laws”), including those governing the discharge of pollutants or hazardous substances into the air, soil or water, the generation, handling, use, management, storage and disposal of, or exposure to, hazardous substances and wastes, the responsibility to investigate and clean up contamination and occupational health and safety. Regulations and courts may impose fines and penalties for non-compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety requirements and the failure to have or to comply with the terms and conditions of required permits. following:

·

the discharge of pollutants or hazardous substances into the air, soil or water,

·

the generation, handling, use, management, storage and disposal of, or exposure to, hazardous substances and wastes,

·

the responsibility to investigate, remediate, monitor and clean up contamination and

·

occupational health and safety.

Our failure to comply with applicable environmental health and safety requirementslaws could result in fines, penalties, enforcement actions, employee, neighbor or other third-party claims for property damage and personal injury, requirements to clean up property or to pay for the costs of cleanup or regulatory or judicial orders requiring corrective measures, including the installation of pollution control equipment or remedial actions.

Certain environmental laws, and regulations, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or the “U.S.U.S. federal Superfund law”)superfund law or its state andor foreign equivalents, may impose the obligation to investigate, remediate, monitor and remediateclean up contamination at a facility on current and former owners, lessees or operators or on persons who may have sent waste to that facility for disposal.  These environmental laws and regulations may impose liability without regard to fault or to the legality of the activities giving rise to the

12


contamination. Although we are not aware of any active litigation against us under the U.S. federal Superfundsuperfund law or its state or foreign equivalents, we have identified contamination has been identified at several of our current and former facilities, and we have incurred and will continue to incur costs to investigate, remediate, monitor and remediateclean up these conditions.

Moreover, we may incur liabilities in connection with environmental conditions currently unknown to us relating to our prior, existing prior or future owned or leased sites or operations or those of predecessor companies whose liabilities we may have assumed or acquired.

13


We believe that indemnities contained in certain of our acquisition agreements may cover certain environmental conditions existing at the time of the acquisition subject to certain terms, limitations and conditions. However, if these indemnification provisions terminate or if the indemnifying parties do not fulfill their indemnification obligations, we may be subject to liability with respect to the environmental matters that those indemnification provisions address.  Although our responsibility for the clean-up of contamination or pollution to date has not been material, were there to be a significant release of contamination or pollution related to our operations, our obligation to clean up that contamination or pollution could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Certain governments at the international, national, regional and state level are at various stages of considering or implementing treaties and environmental laws that could limit emissions of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, associated with the burning of fossil fuels.  It is not possible to predict how new environmental laws to address greenhouse gas emissions would impact our business or that of our customers, but these laws and regulations could impose costs on us or negatively impact the market for the products we distribute and, consequently, our business. 

In addition, federal, state, local, foreign and provincial governments have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, environmental healthlaws that could impose more stringent permitting; disclosure; wastewater and safetyother waste disposal; greenhouse gas, ethane or volatile organic compound control, leak detection and repair requirements;  and well construction and testing requirements on our customers’ hydraulic fracturing. 

Environmental laws and regulations applicable to our business and the business of our customers, including environmental laws regulating the energy industry, and the interpretation or enforcement of these environmental laws, and regulations, are constantly evolving. Itevolving; it is impossible to predict accurately the effect that changes in these environmental laws, and regulations, or their interpretation or enforcement, may have on us.upon our business, financial condition or results of operations. Should environmental laws, and regulations, or their interpretation or enforcement, become more stringent, our costs, or the costs of our customers, could increase, which may have a material adverse effect on us.

In particular, legislation and regulations limiting emissionsour business, financial position, results of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide associated with the burning of fossil fuels, are at various stages of consideration and implementation, at the international, national, regional and state levels. In 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which established a binding set of emission targets for greenhouse gases, became binding on the countries that ratified it. Attention is now focused on the development of a post-2012 international policy framework to guide international action to address climate change when the Kyoto Protocol expired in 2012. Certain states and regions have adoptedoperations or are considering legislation or regulation imposing overall caps or taxes on greenhouse gas emissions from certain sectors or facility categories or mandating the increased use of electricity from renewable energy sources. Similar legislation has been proposed at the federal level. In addition, the EPA has implemented regulations that require permits for and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions for certain categories of emission sources, the most recent of which became effective in August 2012. Pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement, the EPA is in the process of finalizing greenhouse gas emissions standards, known as NSPS, for new power plants and plans to propose NSPS for existing power plants by June 2014 and finalize them a year later.  The settlement agreement also calls for NSPS for greenhouse gas emissions from oil refineries; however the EPA has not proposed such NSPS to date. NSPS for other oil refinery emissions were issued by the EPA pursuant to the settlement agreement in September 2012 and became effective in November 2012 with minor amendments effective in December 2013. These laws and regulations could negatively impact the market for the products we distribute and, consequently, our business.

In addition, federal, state, local, foreign and provincial laws, regulations and permitting requirements have been adopted or are being considered that could impose more stringent permitting, disclosure, wastewater disposal and well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing, a practice involving the injection of water containing certain other substances into rock formations (after perforating the formation with explosive charges) to stimulate production of hydrocarbons, particularly natural gas, from shale basin regions. These effective and potential regulations include a variety of well construction, set back, wastewater disposal, emissions, baseline sampling, operational and disclosure requirements limiting how fracturing can be performed and requiring various degrees of disclosures regarding the contents of chemicals injected into the rock formations, as well as moratoria on all hydraulic fracturing activity. Any increased federal, regional or state regulation of hydraulic fracturing could significantly reduce the demand for our products in the high-growth shale regions of the U.S.cash flows.

We may not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities, including liabilities arising from litigation.

In the ordinary course of business, we have and in the future may become the subject of various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations, the products we distribute, employees and other matters, including potential claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials as a result of the products we distribute or our operations. Some of these claims may relate to the activities of businesses that we have acquired, even though these activities may have occurred prior to our acquisition of the businesses. The products we distribute are sold primarily for use in the energy industry, which is subject to inherent risks that could result in death, personal injury, property damage, pollution, release of hazardous substances or loss of production. In addition, defects in the products we distribute could result in death, personal injury, property damage, pollution, release of hazardous substances or damage to equipment and facilities. Actual or claimed defects in the products we distribute may give rise to claims against us for losses and expose us to claims for damages.

We maintain insurance to cover certain of our potential losses, and we are subject to various self-retentions,self-insured retentions, deductibles and caps under our insurance. It is possible, however, that judgments could be rendered against us in cases in which we would be uninsured and beyond the amounts of insurance we have or beyond the amounts that we currently have reserved or anticipate incurring for these matters. Even a partially uninsured claim, if successful and of significant size, could have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, we may not be able to continue to obtain insurance on commercially reasonable terms in the future, and we may incur losses from interruption of our business that exceed our insurance coverage. Even in cases where we maintain insurance coverage, our insurers may raise various objections and exceptions to coverage that could make uncertain the timing and amount of any possible insurance recovery. Finally, while we may have insurance

13


coverage, we cannot guarantee that the insurance carrier will have the financial wherewithal to pay a claim otherwise covered by insurance, and as a result we may be responsible for any such claims.

Due to our position as a distributor, we are subject to personal injury, product liability and environmental claims involving allegedly defective products.

Our customers use certain of the products we distribute in potentially hazardous applications that can result in personal injury, product liability and environmental claims. A catastrophic occurrence at a location where end users use the products we distribute may result in us being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting potentially large claims, even though we did not manufacture the products. Applicable law may render us liable for damages without regard to negligence or fault. In particular, certain environmental laws provide for joint and several and strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of hazardous substances. Certain of these risks are reduced by the fact that we are a distributor of products that third-party manufacturers produce, and, thus, in certain circumstances, we may have third-party warranty or other claims against the manufacturer of products alleged to have been defective. However, there is no assurance that these claims could fully protect us or that the manufacturer would be able financially to provide protection. There is no assurance that our insurance coverage will cover or be adequate to cover the underlying claims. Our insurance does not provide

14


coverage for all liabilities (including but not limited to liability for certain events involving pollution or other environmental claims).  Our insurance does not cover damages from breach of contract by us or based on alleged fraud or deceptive trade practices.

We are a defendant in asbestos-related lawsuits. Exposure to these and any future lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are a defendant in lawsuits involving approximately 9301,130 claims, arising from exposure to asbestos-containing materials included in products that we distributed in the past. Each claim involves allegations of exposure to asbestos-containing materials by a single individual, his or her spouse or family members. The complaints in these lawsuits typically name many other defendants. In the majority of these lawsuits, little or no information is known regarding the nature of the plaintiffs’ alleged injuries or their connection with the products we distributed. Based on our experience with asbestos litigation to date, as well as the existence of certain insurance coverage, we do not believe that the outcome of these pending claims will have a material impact on us. However, the potential liability associated with asbestos claims is subject to many uncertainties, including negative trends with respect to settlement payments, dismissal rates and the types of medical conditions alleged in pending or future claims, negative developments in the claims pending against us, the current or future insolvency of co-defendants, adverse changes in relevant laws or the interpretation of those laws and the extent to which insurance will be available to pay for defense costs, judgments or settlements. Further, while we anticipate that additional claims will be filed against us in the future, we are unable to predict with any certainty the number, timing and magnitude of future claims. Therefore, we can give no assurance that pending or future asbestos litigation will not ultimately have a material adverse effect on us. See “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies—Legal Proceedings” and “Item 3—Legal Proceedings” for more information.

If we lose any of our key personnel, we may be unable to effectively manage our business or continue our growth.

Our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our management team and our ability to attract, hire, train and retain qualified managerial, sales and marketing personnel. In particular, we rely on our sales and marketing teams to create innovative ways to generate demand for the products we distribute. The loss or unavailability to us of any member of our management team or a key sales or marketing employee could have a material adverse effect on us to the extent we are unable to timely find adequate replacements. We face competition for these professionals from our competitors, our customers and other companies operating in our industry. We may be unsuccessful in attracting, hiring, training and retaining qualified personnel.

Interruptions in the proper functioning of our information systems could disrupt operations and cause increases in costs or decreases in revenues.revenue.

The proper functioning of our information systems is critical to the successful operation of our business. We depend on our information management systems to process orders, track credit risk, manage inventory and monitor accounts receivable collections. Our information systems also allow us to efficiently purchase products from our vendors and ship products to our customers on a timely basis, maintain cost-effective operations and provide superior service to our customers. However, our information systems are vulnerable to natural disasters, power losses, telecommunication failures and other problems. If critical information systems fail or are otherwise unavailable, our ability to procure products to sell, process and ship customer orders, identify business opportunities, maintain proper levels of inventories, collect accounts receivable and pay accounts payable and expenses could be adversely affected. In addition, the cost to repair, modify or replace all or part of our information systems or consolidate one or more systems onto one information technology platform, whether by necessity or choice, would require a significant cash investment on the part of the Company. Our ability to integrate our systems with our customers’ systems would also be significantly affected. We maintain information systems controls designed to protect against, among other things, unauthorized program changes and unauthorized access to data on our information systems. If our information systems controls do not function properly, we face increased risks of unexpected errors and unreliable financial data or theft of proprietary Company information.

14


The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cybersecurity, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information or damage to our Company’s image, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.

A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. More specifically, a cyber incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that can include gaining unauthorized access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. Our three primary risks that could directly result from the occurrence of a cyber incident include operational interruption, damage to our Company’s reputation and image and private data exposure. We have implemented solutions, processes, and procedures to help mitigate this risk, but these measures, as well as our organization’s increased awareness of our risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that our financial results will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

15


The loss of third-party transportation providers upon whom we depend, or conditions negatively affecting the transportation industry, could increase our costs or cause a disruption in our operations.

We depend upon third-party transportation providers for delivery of products to our customers. Strikes, slowdowns, transportation disruptions or other conditions in the transportation industry, including, but not limited to, shortages of truck drivers, disruptions in rail service, increases in fuel prices and adverse weather conditions, could increase our costs and disrupt our operations and our ability to service our customers on a timely basis. We cannot predict whether or to what extent increases or anticipated increases in fuel prices may impact our costs or cause a disruption in our operations going forward.

We may need additional capital in the future, and it may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.

We may require more capital in the future to:

fund our operations;

finance investments in equipment and infrastructure needed to maintain and expand our distribution capabilities;

enhance and expand the range of products we offer; and

respond to potential strategic opportunities, such as investments, acquisitions and international expansion.

We can give no assurance that additional financing will be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. The terms of available financing may place limits on our financial and operating flexibility. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be forced to reduce our operations or delay, limit or abandon expansion opportunities. Moreover, even if we are able to continue our operations, the failure to obtain additional financing could reduce our competitiveness.

Adverse weather events or natural disasters could negatively affect our local economies or disrupt our operations.

Certain areas in which we operate are susceptible to adversesevere weather conditions orevents, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods and to natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods and earthquakes. These events can disrupt our operations, result in damage to our properties and negatively affect the local economies in which we operate. Additionally, we may experience communication disruptions with our customers, vendors and employees. These events can cause physical damage to our branches and require us to close branches. Additionally, our sales order backlog and shipments can experience a temporary decline immediately following these events.

We cannot predict whether or to what extent damage caused by these events will affect our operations or the economies in regions where we operate. These adverse events could result in disruption of our purchasing or distribution capabilities, interruption of our business that exceeds our insurance coverage, our inability to collect from customers and increased operating costs. Our business or results of operations may be adversely affected by these and other negative effects of these events.

We have a substantial amount of goodwill and other intangible assets recorded on our balance sheet, partly because of acquisitions and business combination transactions. The amortization of acquired intangible assets will reduce our future reported earnings. Furthermore, if our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to recognize non-cash charges that would reduce our income.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had $1.3 billion$893 million of goodwill and other intangibles recorded on our consolidated balance sheet. A substantial portion of these intangible assets results from our use of purchase accounting in connection with the acquisitions we have made over the past several years. In accordance with the purchase accounting method, the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets is assigned to goodwill. The amortization expense associated with our identifiable intangible assets will have a negative effect on our future reported earnings. Many other companies, including many of our competitors, may not have the significant acquired intangible assets that we have because they may not have participated in recent acquisitions and business combination transactions similar to ours. Thus, the amortization of identifiable intangible assets may not negatively affect their reported earnings to the same degree as ours.

15


Additionally, under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, goodwill and certain other long livedindefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but must be reviewed for possible impairment annually, or more often in certain circumstances where events indicate that the asset values are not recoverable. These reviews could result in an earnings charge for impairment, which would reduce our net income even though there would be no impact on our underlying cash flow.

We face risks associated with conducting business in markets outside of North America.

16


We currently conduct substantial business in countries outside of North America. In addition, we are evaluating the possibility of establishing distribution networks in certain other foreign countries, particularly in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and South America. We could be materially and adversely affected by economic, legal, political and regulatory developments in the countries in which we do business in the future or in which we expand our business, particularly those countries which have historically experienced a high degree of political or economic instability. Examples of risks inherent in such non-North American activities include:

changes in the political and economic conditions in the countries in which we operate, including civil uprisings and terrorist acts;

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

changes in tariffs;

the adoption of foreign or domestic laws limiting exports to or imports from certain foreign countries;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates and the value of the U.S. dollar;

restrictions on repatriation of earnings;

expropriation of property without fair compensation;

governmental actions that result in the deprivation of contract or proprietary rights; and

the acceptance of business practices which are not consistent with or are antithetical to prevailing business practices we are accustomed to in North America including export compliance and anti-bribery practices and governmental sanctions.

If we begin doing business in a foreign country in which we do not presently operate, we may also face difficulties in operations and diversion of management time in connection with establishing our business there.

We are subject to U.S. and other anti-corruption laws, trade controls, economic sanctions, and similar laws and regulations, including those in the jurisdictions where we operate. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could subject us to civil, criminal and administrative penalties and harm our reputation.

Doing business on a worldwide basis requires us to comply with the laws and regulations of the U.S. government and various foreign jurisdictions. These laws and regulations place restrictions on our operations, trade practices, partners and investment decisions. In particular, our operations are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption and trade control laws and regulations, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), export controls and economic sanctions programs, including those administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). As a result of doing business in foreign countries and with foreign partners, we are exposed to a heightened risk of violating anti-corruption and trade control laws and sanctions regulations.

The FCPA prohibits us from providing anything of value to foreign officials for the purposes of obtaining or retaining business or securing any improper business advantage. It also requires us to keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the Company’s transactions. As part of our business, we may deal with state-owned business enterprises, the employees of which are considered foreign officials for purposes of the FCPA. In addition, the provisions of the United Kingdom Bribery Act (the “Bribery Act”) extend beyond bribery of foreign public officials and also apply to transactions with individuals that a government does not employ. The provisions of the Bribery Act are also more onerous than the FCPA in a number of other respects, including jurisdiction, non-exemption of facilitation payments and penalties. Some of the international locations in which we operate lack a developed legal system and have higher than normal levels of corruption. Our continued expansion outside the U.S., including in developing countries, and our development of new partnerships and joint venture relationships worldwide, could increase the risk of FCPA, OFAC or Bribery Act violations in the future.

Economic sanctions programs restrict our business dealings with certain sanctioned countries, persons and entities. In addition, because we act as a distributor, we face the risk that our customers might further distribute our products to a sanctioned person or entity, or an ultimate end-user in a sanctioned country, which might subject us to an investigation concerning compliance with OFAC or other sanctions regulations.

Violations of anti-corruption and trade control laws and sanctions regulations are punishable by civil penalties, including fines, denial of export privileges, injunctions, asset seizures, debarment from government contracts and revocations or restrictions of licenses, as well as criminal fines and imprisonment. We have established policies and procedures designed to assist our compliance with applicable U.S. and international anti-corruption and trade control laws and regulations, including the FCPA, the Bribery Act and

16


trade controls and sanctions programs administered bythat OFAC administers, and have trained our employees to comply with these laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, consultants, agents or other associated persons will not take actions in violation of our policies and these laws and regulations, and that our policies and procedures will effectively prevent us from violating these regulations in every transaction in which we may engage or provide a defense to any alleged violation. In particular, we may be held liable for the actions that our local, strategic or joint venture partners take inside or outside of the United States, even though our partners may not be subject to these laws. Such a violation, even if our policies prohibit it, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, various state and

17


municipal governments, universities and other investors maintain prohibitions or restrictions on investments in companies that do business with sanctioned countries, persons and entities, which could adversely affect the market for our common stock and other securities.

We face risks associated with international instability and geopolitical developments.

In some countries, there is an increased chance for economic, legal or political changes that may adversely affect the performance of our services, sale of our products or repatriation of our profits. We do not know the impact that these regulatory, geopolitical and other factors may have on our business in the future and any of these factors could adversely affect us.

We are exposed to risks relating to evaluations of controls required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”).

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to annually evaluate our internal controls systems to allow management to report on, and our independent auditors to audit, our internal controls over financial reporting. This is not a static process as we may change our processes each year or acquire new companies that have different controls than our existing controls. Upon completion of this process each year, we may identify control deficiencies of varying degrees of severity under applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) rules and regulations that remain unremediated. We are required to report, among other things, control deficiencies that constitute a “material weakness” or changes in internal controls that, or that are reasonably likely to, materially affect internal controls over financial reporting. A “material weakness” is a significant deficiency or combination of significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that results in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis.

We could suffer a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements if we or our independent registered public accounting firm reports a material weakness in our internal controls, if we do not develop and maintain effective controls and procedures or if we are otherwise unable to deliver timely and reliable financial information. Any loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements or other negative reaction to our failure to develop timely or adequate disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls could result in a decline in the price of our common stock. In addition, if we fail to remedy any material weakness, our financial statements may be inaccurate, we may face restricted access to the capital markets and our stock price may be adversely affected.

The SEC’s move toward a single set of internationalChanges in U.S. generally accepted accounting standardsprinciples could materially impact our results of operations.

The SEC continues to review the possibility of convergence to a single set of certain U.S. accounting standards with certain international accounting standards (such as International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)). on a case by case basis. The associated changes in regulatory accounting may negatively impact the way we record revenues,revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities. Currently, under IFRS, the last in, first out (“LIFO”) method of valuing inventory is not permitted.  If we had ceasedwere required to discontinue valuing our inventory under the LIFO method at December 31, 2013,2016, we would have been required to make tax payments approximating $129.8$77 million over the subsequent four years.

Changes in U.S., foreign, state, provincial and local tax laws could materially impact our results of operations.

Changes in tax laws and tax rates impact us.  For example, in January 2017, a new U.S. President took office and new U.S. Congress was seated.  They have publicly discussed certain proposals to significantly change the U.S. tax system.  Until specific changes in tax laws are enacted, it is unclear what impact the policies of the new President and Congress will have on the Company’s financial results.  For instance, the Company currently utilizes the LIFO method of valuing inventory.  Changes in the treatment of LIFO under tax laws could impact the tax treatment of LIFO.   If we were required to discontinue valuing our inventory under the LIFO method at December 31, 2016, we would have been required to make tax payments approximating $77 million over the subsequent four years. Changes that could have a significant cost to us include changes in tax law or tax rates, the unfavorable resolution of tax assessments or audits by various taxing authorities.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends to our common stockholders in the foreseeable future.

It is uncertain when, if ever, we will declare dividends to our common stockholders. We do not currently intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends is constrained by our holding company structure under which we are dependent on our subsidiaries for payments. Additionally, we and our subsidiaries are parties to credit agreements which restrict our ability and their ability to pay dividends. See “Item 5—Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related ShareholderStockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” and “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

18


Compliance with and changes in laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate could have a significant financial impact and affect how and where we conduct our operations.

We have operations in the U.S. and in 19 countries that can be impacted by21 countries; expected and unexpected changes in the business and legal environments in the countries in which we operate.operate can impact us. Compliance with and changes in laws, regulations, and other legal and business issues could impact our ability to manage our costs and to meet our earnings goals. Compliance related matters could also limit our

17


ability to do business in certain countries. Changes that could have a significant cost to us include new legislation, new regulations, or a differing interpretation of existing laws and regulations, changes in tax law or tax rates, the unfavorable resolution of tax assessments or audits by various taxing authorities, the expansion of currency exchange controls, export controls or additional restrictions on doing business in countries subject to sanctions in which we operate or intend to operate.

Election of a new U.S. president supported by a majority of the U.S. Congress from the same political party could significantly change regulatory, legal, tax, trade and foreign affairs policies, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business.

In January 2017, a new U.S. President took office and new U.S. Congress was seated.   They have publicly made statements regarding the desire to support U.S. energy producers, refocus the EPA on its core mission, focus on U.S. interests first and lessen the regulatory burden on businesses to create job growth.  They have also announced an aggressive policy agenda to change the tax system, modify the relationships between the United States and other countries, cancel or modify trade treaties and remake relationships with other countries. Until specific laws are enacted, executive actions are taken or federal regulatory action is passed, it is unclear what impact these policies will have on our business.  Adverse impacts could include (among others) increased prices for products from non-U.S. suppliers that may or may not be passed on to our U.S. customers, tariffs that non-U.S. countries may impose on products from our U.S. suppliers in our Canadian and International segments, changes in exchange rates to take into account new tax and trade systems that could adversely impact our financial results, a change in activity in oil producing markets, with some markets with more robust activity and other markets with declining activity depending on trade agreements and tax regimes, worldwide demand for energy and the impact on oil and gas prices depending on the impact of these policies on economic conditions in various countries and the change in relationships between the U.S. and other countries and the resulting impact of retaliatory trade and security policies.  The oil and gas markets in which our customers participate are generally global.  It is unclear what impact the announced protectionist policies could have on our customers’ businesses and our business.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 

Not applicable.

ITEM  2.PROPERTIES

In North America, we operate a modified hub and spoke model that is centered around our nine10 distribution centers in the U.SU.S. and Canada with more than 170130 branch locations which have inventory and local employees.employees and house 15 valve automation service centers. Our U.S. network is comprised of over 130107 branch locations and 8nine distribution centers. We own our Charleston, WV corporate office and our Nitro, WV and our Houston, TX (Darien Street) distribution centers and lease the remaining sixseven distribution centers. In Canada, we have over 4027 branch locations and we own our one distribution center in Nisku, Alberta, Canada. We own less than 15% of our branch locations as we primarily lease the facilities.

Outside North America, we operate through a network of over 5556 branch locations located throughout Europe, Asia, Australasia and the Middle East, including six distribution centers in each of the United Kingdom, Norway, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Arab Emirates and Australia. We also maintain an operations center forTwelve valve automation service centers are housed within our international operations in Bradford, United Kingdom.distribution centers and branch locations. We own our Brussels, Belgium location, and the remainder of our locations are leased.

Our Company maintains its principal executive office at 2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin1301 McKinney Street, Suite 3100,2300, Houston, Texas, 77010 and also maintains a corporate officesoffice in Charleston, WV, and in Tulsa, OK. All threeWV.  These locations have corporate functions such as executive management, accounting, human resources, legal, marketing, supply chain management, business development and information technology. We also maintain operations centers for our Canadian operations in Calgary, Alberta and for our international operations in Bradford, United Kingdom.

ITEM  3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

From time to time, we have been subject to various claims and involved in legal proceedings incidental to the nature of our businesses. We maintain insurance coverage to reduce financial risk associated with certain of these claims and proceedings. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these claims and proceedings. However, in our opinion, there are no material pending legal proceedings that upon resolution are likely to have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Also, from time to time, in the ordinary course of our business, our customers may claim that the products that we distribute are either defective or require repair or replacement under warranties that either we or the manufacturer may provide to the customer. These proceedings are, in the opinion of management, ordinary and routine matters incidental to our normal business. Our purchase orders with our suppliers generally require the manufacturer to indemnify us against any product liability claims, leaving the manufacturer

19


ultimately responsible for these claims. In many cases, state, provincial or foreign law provides protection to distributors for these sorts of claims, shifting the responsibility to the manufacturer. In some cases, we could be required to repair or replace the products for the benefit of our customer and seek our recovery from the manufacturer for our expense. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these claims and proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

For information regarding asbestos cases in which we are a defendant and other claims and proceedings, see “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies—Legal Proceedings” and “Note 15—16—Commitments and Contingencies” to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

ITEM  4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES 

Not applicable.  

1820


 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT 

The name, age, period of service and the title of each of our executive officers as of February 21, 201417, 2017 are listed below.

Andrew R. Lane, age 54,57, has served as our president and chief executive officer (“CEO”) since September 2008 and our chairman of the board since December 2009.2008.  He has also served as a director of MRC Global Inc. since September 2008.2008 and was chairman of the board from December 2009 to April 2016. From December 2004 to December 2007, he served as executive vice president and chief operating officer of Halliburton Company, where he was responsible for Halliburton’s overall operational performance. Prior to that, he held a variety of leadership roles within Halliburton. Mr. Lane received a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Southern Methodist University in 1981 (cum laude). He also completed the Advanced Management Program (A.M.P.(“A.M.P.”) at Harvard Business School in 2000.

James E. Braun, age 54,57, has served as our executive vice president and chief financial officer since November 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Braun served as chief financial officer of Newpark Resources, Inc. since 2006. Newpark provides drilling fluids and other products and services to the oil and gas exploration and production industry, both inside and outside of the U.S. Before joining Newpark, Mr. Braun held a varietywas chief financial officer of leadership positions withBaker Oil Tools, one of the largest divisions of Baker Hughes Incorporated, a leading provider of drilling, formation evaluation, completion and production products and services to the worldwide oil and gas industry. From 1998 until 2002, he was vice president, finance and administration of Baker Petrolite, the oilfield specialty chemical business division of Baker Hughes.  Previously, he served as vice president and controller of Baker Hughes.  Mr. Braun is a CPA and was formerly a partner with Deloitte & Touche. Mr. Braun received a B.A. in accounting from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Daniel J. Churay, age 51,54, has served as our executive vice president  corporate affairs, general counsel and corporate secretary since May 2012. In his current role, Mr. Churay manages the Company’s human resources, legal, risk and compliance, external and government affairs and certain shared services functions. He also acts as corporate secretary to the Company’s board of directors. Prior to May 2012, Mr. Churay served as executive vice president and general counsel since August 2011 and as our corporate secretary since November 2011. From December 2010 to June 2011, he served as president and CEO of Rex Energy Corporation, an independent oil and gas company. From September 2002 to December 2010, Mr. Churay served as executive vice president, general counsel and secretary of YRC Worldwide Inc., a transportation and logistics company. Mr. Churay received a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Texas and a juris doctorate from the University of Houston Law Center, where he was a member of the Law Review.

Gary A. IttnerSteinar Aasland, age 61, has served as executive50, is our senior vice president of supply chain managementinternational operations since August 2013.2015.  Prior to thisthat role, he served as our senior vice president – Europe since April 2014.  Before that, he was the CEO of Stream AS, which was acquired by MRC Global in 2014, and was responsible for all business activities of its three subsidiaries, Teamtrade, Solberg & Andersen and Energy Piping.  Mr. Aasland has more than 20 years of executive management experience in the PVF industry.  Mr. Aasland currently serves as the Chairman of the Board for the Stavanger Chamber of Commerce.  He is a mechanical engineer and holds a masters degree in strategy and management from BI Norwegian Business School.

Grant Bates, age 45,  is our senior vice president of corporate strategy, mergersoperational excellence and acquisitionschief information officer since September 2012. From September 2010 to May 2012,April 2016. In this role, he is responsible for our global quality, safety, health and environment (QHSE) and our transportation, warehouse operations, business processes and customer implementation teams and information systems.    Mr. Bates previously led our Canada region since March 2014 and served as our executiveregional vice president of global supply chain management and as our chief administrative officer.the Australasian region since March 2012. Mr. Bates joined MRC Global in March 2012 through the acquisition of OneSteel Piping Systems. Prior to that, he served as our executive vice president—supply chain management from October 2008 to September 2010.the acquisition, Mr. Ittner began working at MRC in 1971 following his freshman year at the University of Cincinnati and joined MRC full-time following his graduation in 1974.

Rory M. Isaac, age 63, has served as executive vice president – international operations since July 2013.  Mr. Isaac has served as executive vice president of corporate strategy, mergers and acquisitions from September 2012 to June 2013. Prior to this role, Mr. IsaacBates served as the executive vice presidentNational Manager of global business development since December 2008. Prior to December 2008, he servedOneSteel Piping Systems. He has more than a decade of experience in manufacturing and distribution in a variety of leadership positions withinmanagement roles, including several years as a business analyst and consulting engineer. Mr. Bates holds a B.E. in mechanical engineering from the Company since 1981.  Mr. Isaac attended the Citadel.University of Newcastle, a graduate diploma in management and a master of business administration from Deakin University.

Alan ColonnaJohn L. Bowhay, age 56,has51, is our senior vice president – supply chain management, valve and technical product sales since August 2015.  He previously served as our executivesenior vice president of global business developmentAsia Pacific and U.S.Middle East operations since August 2014.  Before that, Mr. Bowhay served as vice president of European operations since August 2013.  Prior to this role, heMr. Bowhay served as the managing director for our executiveUnited Kingdom operations and prior to that role, he was the vice president of globalsales in the U.K.  He brings more than 31 years of industry experience and valve expertise to the MRC Global team.  Mr. Bowhay attended the London Business School.

G. Tod Moss, age 55, is our senior vice president of U.S. Western Region and Canada operations since April 2016. Since 2001, Mr. Moss has held multiple operational leadership positions at our Company. He has been involved in opening and expanding many of our service locations in the Rockies, Alaska and North Dakota, as well as our Cheyenne, Tulsa, Odessa and Bakersfield regional distribution centers. Prior to these roles, Mr. Moss was the branch manager in Salt Lake City, Utah from 1993 – 2001, and served as assistant product manager of tubular products from 1991-1993. His early career included various field positions including inside sales, outside sales and responsibility for coordinating the line pipe sales and inventory level in the Western U.S.  Mr. Moss began with Vinson Supply in 1984, which was later acquired by Red Man Pipe & Supply. Over the course of his career, he has been involved in

21


integrating the key acquisitions of Wesco Equipment, Dresser Oil Tools and Chaparral Supply. Mr. Moss attended the University of Utah.

Robert W. Stein,  age 58, isour senior vice president of business development since April 2016. He previously led our downstream and integrated supply chainteams. Prior to that, Mr. Stein led our U.S. Southwestern region operations. He has been part of MRC Global since 1984 and has served in a variety of roles including regional and branch management, downstream business development, project services and integrated supply. Mr. Stein received a B.B.A. in business management from Sam Houston State University.

Karl W. Witt, age, 56, is our senior vice president of U.S. Eastern Region and Gulf Coast operations since September 2012. From 2009 through September 2012,April 2016. Prior to that, he served in a variety of roles including seven years as the senior regional vice president of the Gulf Coast U.S. region.Eastern region and seven years as regional vice president of the Midwest sub-region as well as warehouse manager, outside sales representative, branch manager and vice president of operations with Joliet Valves, which was acquired by McJunkin Red Man Corporation in 2001. Mr. Witt attended South Suburban College in Chicago.

Elton Bond, age 41, has served as our senior vice president and chief accounting officer since May 2011.  From September 2009 to May 2011, he served as senior vice president and treasurer.  Prior to that, he heldserved as vice president of finance and compliance since December 2008. Before that, Mr. Bond was the director of finance and compliance since January 2007.  He started his career with MRC Global as the acquisition development manager in April 2006.  Prior to joining MRC Global, Mr. Bond was employed with Ernst & Young LLP from 1997 to 2006, serving in a variety of leadershiproles, including senior manager of assurance and operational positions withadvisory business services. Mr. Bond received a B.B.A. from Marshall University in 1997.  He is a member of the Company. Mr. Colonna graduated from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, California in 1982. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and a member of the West Virginia Society of CPAs.

1922


 

PART II

ITEM  5.MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 

MRC Global Inc. common stock began tradingis listed on the New York Stock Exchange on April 12, 2012 following an initial public offering at a price of $21.00 which subsequently closed on April 17, 2012.(“NYSE’) under the symbol “MRC”. The following table illustrates the high and low sales prices as reported by the NYSE for the subsequent quarters.two most recent years by quarter: 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2016

 

First Quarter

 

Second Quarter

 

Third Quarter

 

Fourth Quarter

 

First Quarter

 

Second Quarter

 

Third Quarter

 

Fourth Quarter

Common stock sale price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

$            33.11

 

$                    34.14

 

$               29.11

 

$                32.70

 

$            15.14

 

$                    15.34

 

$               16.50

 

$                22.52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Low

 

$            26.86

 

$                    26.48

 

$               23.15

 

$                26.51

 

$              8.50

 

$                    12.65

 

$               11.50

 

$                13.68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

2015

 

 

 

Second Quarter (from April 12, 2012)

 

Third Quarter

 

Fourth Quarter

 

First Quarter

 

Second Quarter

 

Third Quarter

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

 

 

$                    21.50

 

$               25.82

 

$                28.55

 

$            15.36

 

$                    17.62

 

$               15.80

 

$                15.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Low

 

 

 

$                    19.04

 

$               20.02

 

$                21.60

 

$            10.20

 

$                    11.85

 

$               10.45

 

$                10.73



As of February 5, 2014,10, 2017, there were 250311 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

Our board of directors has not declared any dividends on common stock during 20122016 or 20132015 and currently has no intention to declare any dividends.

McJunkin Red Man Corporation’sThe Company’s Global ABL Facility, and Term Loan and our 6.5% Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock restrict our ability to declare cash dividends.dividends under certain circumstances. Any future dividends declared would be at the discretion of our board of directors and would depend on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, contractual obligations, the terms of our financing agreements at the time a dividend is considered, and other relevant factors.



Issuer Purchases of Securities 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A summary of our purchases of MRC Global Inc. common stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)

 

Average Price Paid per Share

 

Total number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)

 

Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

October 1 - October 31

320 

 

$              14.82

 

 -

 

$                     25,036,934

November 1 - November 30

388,788 

 

$              15.43

 

388,788 

 

$                     19,037,882

December 1 - December 31

73,199 

 

$              18.65

 

73,018 

 

$                     17,676,498



462,307 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) We purchased 501 shares in connection with funding employee income tax withholding obligations arising upon the lapse of restrictions on restricted shares. 

(2) We purchased 461,806 shares during the period as part of a share repurchase program authorized by the Company's board in November 2015. The plan originally allowed for purchases of common stock up to $100 million and is scheduled to expire in December 2017.  In November 2016, the Company's board approved an increase in the plan to $125 million.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023


 



PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock to the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Industrial SuppliersOil Service Sector Index. The total shareholder return assumes $100 invested on April 12, 2012, the date our stock first traded following our initial public offering, in MRC Global Inc., the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Industrial SuppliersOil Service Sector Index. It also assumes reinvestment of all dividends. The results shown in the graph below are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

Comparison of Cumulative Total Return

 

This information shall not be deemed to be ‘‘soliciting material’’ or to be ‘‘filed’’ with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A (17 CFR 240.14a-1-240.14a-104), other than as provided in Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r).

 

2124


 


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

The selected financial data presented below have been derived from the consolidated financial statements of MRC Global Inc. that have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. This data should be read in conjunction with “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this report.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

 

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

$             5,230.8

 

$             5,570.8

 

$             4,832.4

 

$             3,845.5

 

$             3,661.9

 

 

$       3,041

 

$       4,529

 

$       5,933

 

$       5,231

 

$       5,571

Cost of sales

 

4,276.0 

 

4,557.1 

 

4,124.2 

 

3,327.4 

 

3,113.9 

 

 

2,573 

 

3,743 

 

4,915 

 

4,276 

 

4,557 

Gross profit

 

954.8 

 

1,013.7 

 

708.2 

 

518.1 

 

548.0 

 

 

468 

 

786 

 

1,018 

 

955 

 

1,014 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

643.0 

 

606.7 

 

513.6 

 

451.7 

 

411.6 

 

 

524 

 

606 

 

716 

 

643 

 

607 

Goodwill and intangibles impairment charges

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

386.1 

Operating income (loss)

 

311.8 

 

407.0 

 

194.6 

 

66.4 

 

(249.7)

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 

 

 -

 

462 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(56)

 

(282)

 

302 

 

312 

 

407 

Other (expenses) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(60.7)

 

(112.5)

 

(136.8)

 

(139.6)

 

(116.5)

 

 

(35)

 

(48)

 

(62)

 

(61)

 

(112)

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

 -

 

(114.0)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(114)

Expenses associated with refinancing

 

(5.1)

 

(1.7)

 

(9.5)

 

 -

 

 -

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

4.7 

 

2.2 

 

7.0 

 

(4.9)

 

8.9 

Other, net

 

(13.8)

 

0.7 

 

0.5 

 

2.9 

 

2.5 

 

 

 -

 

(12)

 

(14)

 

(14)

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

236.9 

 

181.7 

 

55.8 

 

(75.2)

 

(354.8)

Income taxes

 

84.8 

 

63.7 

 

26.8 

 

(23.4)

 

(15.0)

Net income (loss)

 

$                152.1

 

$                118.0

 

$                  29.0

 

$                 (51.8)

 

$               (339.8)

Earnings (loss) per share amounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

 

(91)

 

(342)

 

226 

 

237 

 

182 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(8)

 

(11)

 

82 

 

85 

 

64 

Net (loss) income

 

 

(83)

 

(331)

 

144 

 

152 

 

118 

Series A preferred stock dividends

 

 

24 

 

13 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

 

 

$         (107)

 

$         (344)

 

$          144

 

$          152

 

$          118

Earnings per share amounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$                  1.50

 

$                  1.22

 

$                  0.34

 

$                 (0.61)

 

$                 (4.30)

 

 

$        (1.10)

 

$        (3.38)

 

$         1.41

 

$         1.50

 

$         1.22

Diluted

 

$                  1.48

 

$                  1.22

 

$                  0.34

 

$                 (0.61)

 

$                 (4.30)

 

 

$        (1.10)

 

$        (3.38)

 

$         1.40

 

$         1.48

 

$         1.22

Weighted average shares, basic (in thousands)

 

101,712 

 

96,465 

 

84,417 

 

84,384 

 

79,067 

Weighted average shares, diluted (in thousands)

 

102,522 

 

96,925 

 

84,655 

 

84,384 

 

79,067 

Dividends

 

$                       -

 

$                       -

 

$                       -

 

$                       -

 

$                  0.04

Weighted-average shares, basic

 

 

97.3 

 

102.1 

 

102.0 

 

101.7 

 

96.5 

Weighted-average shares, diluted

 

 

97.3 

 

102.1 

 

102.8 

 

102.5 

 

96.9 

Dividends (common)

 

 

$               -

 

$              -

 

$              -

 

$              -

 

$              -



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$                 25.2

 

$                 37.1

 

$                 46.1

 

$                 56.2

 

$                 56.2

 

 

$          109

 

$           69

 

$           25

 

$           25

 

$           37

Working capital (1)

 

1,083.9 

 

1,200.5 

 

1,074.7 

 

842.6 

 

930.2 

 

 

684 

 

960 

 

1,504 

 

1,084 

 

1,200 

Total assets

 

3,335.7 

 

3,369.7 

 

3,229.9 

 

2,991.2 

 

3,083.2 

 

 

2,164 

 

2,497 

 

3,869 

 

3,327 

 

3,358 

Long-term obligations (2)

 

986.8 

 

1,256.6 

 

1,526.7 

 

1,360.2 

 

1,452.6 

Long-term debt (2)

 

 

414 

 

519 

 

1,447 

 

978 

 

1,245 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

 

355 

 

355 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Stockholders' equity

 

1,338.3 

 

1,185.9 

 

720.8 

 

689.8 

 

743.9 

 

 

763 

 

956 

 

1,397 

 

1,338 

 

1,186 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

Other Financial Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash flow:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$                323.6

 

$                240.1

 

$               (102.9)

 

$                112.7

 

$                505.5

 

 

$          253

 

$          690

 

$         (106)

 

$          324

 

$          240

Investing activities

 

(69.4)

 

(183.0)

 

(48.0)

 

(16.2)

 

(66.9)

 

 

16 

 

(41)

 

(362)

 

(69)

 

(183)

Financing activities

 

(265.0)

 

(60.5)

 

140.6 

 

(98.2)

 

(393.9)

 

 

(226)

 

(599)

 

467 

 

(265)

 

(60)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



(1)Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.

(2)Includes current portion of long-term debt.

2225


 


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A—Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. All references throughout this section (and elsewhere in this report) to amounts available for borrowing under various credit facilities refer to amounts actually available for borrowing after giving effect to any borrowing base limitations that each facility imposes.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (as well as other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Forward-looking statements include those preceded by, followed by or including the words “will,” “expect,” “intended,” “anticipated,” “believe,” “project,” “forecast,” “propose,” “plan,” “estimate,” “enable,” and similar expressions, including, for example, statements about our business strategy, our industry, our future profitability, growth in the industry sectors we serve, our expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, prospects and assumptions, and estimates and projections of future activity and trends in the oil and natural gas industry. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. These statements are based on management’s expectations that involve a number of business risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, including the factors described under “Item 1A - Risk Factors”, that may cause our actual results and performance to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among other things: 

decreases in oil and natural gas prices;

decreases in oil and natural gas industry expenditure levels, which may result from decreased oil and natural gas prices or other factors;

increased usage of alternative fuels, which may negatively affect oil and natural gas industry expenditure levels;

decreases in oil and natural gas prices;

U.S. and international general economic conditions;

our ability to compete successfully with other companies in our industry;

the risk that manufacturers of the products we distribute will sell a substantial amount of goods directly to end users in the industry sectors we serve;

unexpected supply shortages;

cost increases by our suppliers;

our lack of long-term contracts with most of our suppliers; 

suppliers’ price reductions of products that we sell, which could cause the value of our inventory to decline;

decreases in steel prices, which could significantly lower our profit;

increases in steel prices, which we may be unable to pass along to our customers which could significantly lower our profit;

our lack of long-term contracts with many of our customers and our lack of contracts with customers that require minimum purchase volumes;

changes in our customer and product mix;

risks related to our customers’ creditworthiness;

the success of our acquisition strategies;

the potential adverse effects associated with integrating acquisitions into our business and whether these acquisitions will yield their intended benefits;

our significant indebtedness;

the dependence on our subsidiaries for cash to meet our debt obligations;

changes in our credit profile;

23


a decline in demand for certain of the products we distribute if import restrictions on these products are lifted;

26


environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and the interpretation or implementation thereof;

the sufficiency of our insurance policies to cover losses, including liabilities arising from litigation;

product liability claims against us;

pending or future asbestos-related claims against us;

the potential loss of key personnel;

interruption in the proper functioning of our information systems;

the occurrence of cybersecurity incidents;

loss of third-party transportation providers;

potential inability to obtain necessary capital;

risks related to adverse weather events or natural disasters;

impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets;

adverse changes in political or economic conditions in the countries in which we operate;

exposure to U.S. and international laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act and other economic sanctions programs;

risks associated with international instability and geopolitical developments;

"

risks associated with international instability and geopolitical developments;

risks relating to ongoing evaluations of internal controls required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; 

the impact on us of the SEC’s move toward convergence with IFRS;changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or tax laws;  

our intention not to pay dividends; and

the occurrenceimpact of cybersecurity incidents.U.S. government policies.

Undue reliance should not be placed on our forward-looking statements. Although forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise, except to the extent law requires.

Overview

We are the largest global industrial distributor, based on sales, of PVFpipe, valves, and fittings (“PVF”) and related products and services to the energy industry and hold a leading position in our industry across each of the upstream (exploration, production and extraction of underground oil and natural gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and natural gas, natural gas utilities and the storage and distribution of oil and natural gas) and downstream (crude oil refining, petrochemical and chemical, processing and general industrials) sectors. Our business is segregated into three geographicalgeographic reportable segments, consisting of our U.S., Canadian,Canada and International operations. We serve our customers in over 400from approximately 300 service locations. We offer a wide array of PVF and oilfield supplies encompassing a complete line of products from our global network of over 12,000 suppliers to our more than 19,00017,000 customers. We are diversified by geography, the industry sectors we serve and the products we sell. We seek to provide best-in-class service to our customers by satisfying the most complex, multi-site needs of many of the largest companies in the energy and industrial sectorssector as their primary PVF supplier. We believe the critical role we play in our customers’ supply chain, together with our extensive product offering, broad global presence, customer-linked scalable information systems and efficient distribution capabilities, serve to solidify our long-standing customer relationships and drive our growth. As a result, we have an average relationship of over 2025 years with our 25 largest customers.

27


Key Drivers of Our Business

Our revenuesrevenue are predominantly derived from the sale of PVF and other oilfield and industrial supplies to the energy sector in North America, Europe, Asia and Australasia.globally. Our business is, therefore, dependent upon both the current conditions and future prospects in the energy industry and, in particular, maintenance and expansionary operating and capital expenditures by our customers in the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors of the industry. We have seen customer spending fall off significantly beginning in late 2014 and continuing through 2016 as a result of lower oil and natural gas prices.  Long-term growth in spending has been and we believe will continue to be, driven by several factors, including underinvestment in global energy infrastructure, growth in shale and unconventional exploration and production (“E&P”) activity, and anticipated strength in the oil, natural gas, refined products petrochemical and other industrialpetrochemical sectors. The outlook for future oil, natural gas, refined products petrochemical and other industrialpetrochemical PVF spending is influenced by numerous factors, including the following:

Oil and Natural Gas Prices. Sales of PVF and related products to the oil and natural gas industry constitute a significant portionover 90% of our sales. As a result, we depend upon the oil and natural gas industry and its ability and willingness to make maintenance and capital expenditures to explore for, produce and process oil, and natural gas and refined products. Oil and

24


natural gas prices, both current and projected, along with the costs necessary to produce oil and gas, impact other drivers of our business, including E&Pcapital spending by customers, additions and maintenance to pipeline mileage, refinery utilization and petrochemical and other industrial processing activity.

Economic Conditions. The demand for the products we distribute is dependent on the general economy, the energy and industrials sectorssector and other factors. Changes in the general economy or in the energy and industrials sectorssector (domestically or internationally) can cause demand for the products we distribute to materially change.

Customer, Manufacturer and Distributor Inventory Levels of PVF and Related Products. Customer, manufacturerManufacturer and distributor inventory levels of PVF and related products can change significantly from period to period. Increases in our customers’ inventory levels can have an adverse effect on the demand for the products we distribute when customers draw from their inventory rather than purchase new products. Reduced demand, in turn, would likely result in reduced sales volume and profitability. Increased inventory levels by manufacturers or other distributors can cause an oversupply of PVF and related products in the industry sectors we serve and reduce the prices that we are able to charge for the products we distribute. Reduced prices, in turn, would likely reduce our profitability. Conversely, decreased customer and manufacturer inventory levels may ultimately lead to increased demand for our products and would likely result in increased sales volumes and overall profitability.

•  Steel Prices, Availability and Supply and Demand. Fluctuations in steel prices can lead to volatility in the pricing of the products we distribute, especially carbon steel tubular products, which can influence the buying patterns of our customers. A majority of the products we distribute contain various types of steel. The worldwide supply and demand for these products, or other steel products that we do not supply, impacts the pricing and availability of our products and, ultimately, our sales and operating profitability.

Recent Trends and Outlook

During 2013,2016, the average oil price of West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) was relatively stable at $97.78decreased to $43.29 per barrel compared to $94.05$48.66 per barrel in 2012.  Despite the relative strength of oil prices, U.S. drilling activity decreased 8% in 2013 as compared to 2012.2015.  Natural gas prices increaseddecreased to an average price of  $3.73/$2.52/Mcf (Henry Hub) for 20132016 compared to $2.75/$2.62/Mcf (Henry Hub) for 2012.2015.  North American drilling rig activity decreased 45% in 2016 compared to 2015.

In recent years, there has been an increase in the global supply of crude oil, including the contribution of U.S. shale oil, at a pace exceeding demand growth.  This increase combined with a hesitance on the part of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to curb production triggered a dramatic decline in oil prices that began in late 2014, continued throughout 2015, and persists today, but supply and demand is expected to tighten with production cuts announced by OPEC in November 2016.  This low price environment has, in turn, resulted in a dramatic decline in exploration and production (“E&P”) capital spending by our customers, which directly impacts our business.  In 2016, customer spending fell by 27%, following a 21% decline in 2015, which brought spending to its lowest levels since 2009.  This marks the first time in nearly 30 years that global spending has been down in consecutive years.  However, the current price has increased to approximately $5.00/Mcf (Henry Hub).  Rigwe are encouraged by recent improvements in oil prices and drilling activity continuesand expect 2017 revenue to be heavily weighted toward oil relativehigher than 2016.  Prominent exploration and production (“E&P”) spending surveys, which include many of our customers, indicate that 2017 spending will increase with more significant growth in 2018 and 2019.  We expect our business to natural gas, with oil drilling representing 78% offollow the total U.S. rig count during 2013 compared to 71% for 2012.  Because of the increased natural gas pricing, we anticipate this trend could start to reverse modestly in 2014.same trend.

In 2013, we completed our strategic initiativeJanuary 2017, a new U.S. President took office and new U.S. Congress was seated.   They have publicly made statements regarding the desire to support United States energy producers, refocus the EPA on its core mission, focus on United States interests first and lessen the regulatory burden on businesses to create job growth.  They have also announced an aggressive policy agenda to change the tax system, modify the relationships between the United States and other countries, cancel or modify trade treaties and remake relationships with other countries. Until specific laws are passed, executive actions are taken or federal regulatory action is enacted, it is unclear what impact these policies will have on our higher marginbusiness.  While at first impression these policies could decrease the regulatory and tax burden on our business and the businesses of our U.S. customers, increase oil and gas production in the U.S. and, as a result, our U.S. business activity and increase the sales of product linesfrom our U.S. suppliers, it is not clear that all impacts would be positive.  However, in the absence of specifics and given the government’s generally supportive stance for the oil and gas industry, and based on

28


E&P spending surveys and our customers’ current outlook for oil and gas supply and demand, we expect our business to increase in 2017 with continued growth through 2018 and 2019.

We have taken steps in 2016 to reduce exposureour operating costs.  We have maintained our hiring and salary freezes, which were implemented in 2015, and eliminated an additional 600 full-time positions and closed 30 branches in 2016. As a result of these actions, we recorded pre-tax severance and restructuring charges of $20 million in 2016.  We have reduced our headcount by approximately 1,500 or 30%, and our number of branch locations by 74, or 31%, since June 2014.  In addition to these efforts to address costs, we continuously manage our investment in working capital to an appropriate level based on current and forecasted sales volumes. 

In the third quarter of 2016, we incurred non-cash inventory-related charges totaling $45 million necessary to reduce the carrying value of certain products determined to be excess or obsolete to their estimated net realizable value based on our current market outlook for those products.  This amount included $24 million in the International segment primarily related to a restructuring of our Australian business and market conditions in Iraq.  Reserves for excess and obsolete inventory were increased in the U.S. and Canada by $16 million and $5 million, respectively.

In August 2016, we announced a plan to restructure and downsize our Australian operations in response to the continued downturn in the oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) business.and gas and mining industries in the region.  As a result of this strategy, OCTG represented only 9%plan, we incurred $17 million of total salescharges, including $10 million of inventory-related charges, $4 million of lease termination and property costs,  $2 million of employee severance and $1 million of other relocation costs.  These charges included $7 million of cash costs.  The restructuring plan was substantially completed during the fourth quarter of 2016. Elsewhere in 2013 comparedour International segment, the United Kingdom’s decision to 13% in 2012.  Theexit the European Union (“Brexit”) has created uncertainty around European currencies, along with uncertain effects of future trade and other cross border activities of the U.K. with the European Union and other countries.  We expect a minimal impact of this rebalancing effort was to reduceon our OCTG sales by $251 million in 2013 as compared to 2012. 

In July 2013, we completed the acquisition of Dan H. Brown, Inc. d/b/a Flow Control Products (“Flow Control”).  Flow Control is a leading provider in pneumaticbusiness, and electro-hydraulic valve automation packages and related field support to the Permian Basin.  We are expanding our existing facility in Odessa, Texas, into a 110,000 square foot regional distribution center.  When completedcenters in 2014, the Flow Control business will begin to operate from this newly expanded facility.

Internationally, we have transformed our business through two recent acquisitions, Stream AS (“Stream”), a $260 million acquisition, in January 2014both Bradford, U.K. and Flangefitt Stainless Ltd. (“Flangefitt”) in December 2013.  Stream, headquartered in Norway, is the leading PVF distributor and provider of flow control products, solutions and services to the offshore and oil and gas industry on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (“NCS”), the world’s largest offshore sector.  The Stream acquisition provides a platform for growth in offshore applications where our major customers have been very active.  Flangefitt, headquartered in Warrington, England, with a location in Aberdeen, Scotland is a leading PFF distributor to the oil and gas industry.   The Flangefitt acquisition complements our existing U.K. based, MRC Transmark valve business asRotterdam, Netherlands position us well as the Stream Energy Piping business.  Both acquisitions provide a full range of PVF to serve both ofour customers in the NCSU.K. and the U.K. Continental Shelf sectors as well as global projects with high-end alloy PFF requirements. European Union.

In January 2014, we terminated a profit sharing agreement with respect to certain oilfield supply and service stores in western Canada.  This profit sharing agreement required us to make annual profit sharing payments to Europump Systems, Inc. (“Europump”) related to PVF sales in the heavy oil region of Canada.  In conjunction with the termination of this agreement, we sold our progressive cavity pump (“PCP”) distribution and servicing business to Europump, our primary supplier of PCP pumps. We believe this divestiture will allow us to focus on our core business of supplying PVF products and services to the energy and industrial markets.  We expect the impact of this divestiture to be a reduction in sales of approximately $82 million in 2014; however, through the elimination of costs associated with the business, including the profit sharing payments to Europump, we expect the impact of the sale will have a modestly accretive impact on profitability going forward.  However, we do anticipate a first quarter 2014 pre-tax charge of approximately $7 million ($4.6 million after-tax) associated with the termination of the profit sharing agreement.

25


   

We determine backlog by the amount of unshipped customer orders, either specific or general in nature, (including orders held under pipe programs), which the customer may revise or cancel in certain instances.  OurThe table below details our backlog atby segment (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2016*

 

2015*

 

2014*

U.S.

$              472

 

$              305

 

$              610

Canada

36 

 

34 

 

66 

International

241 

 

161 

 

260 



$              749

 

$              500

 

$              936

*Amounts excluded U.S. OCTG backlog of $0 million, $42 million, and $157 million for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.  We disposed of our U.S. OCTG product line in February 2016.

Approximately 28% of our December 31, 20132016 ending backlog was $758 million including $470 million, $90 million and $198 millionassociated with one customer in our US, Canadian and International segments, respectively. Our backlog at December 31, 2012 was $664 million including $455 million, $62 million and $147 million in our US, Canadian and International segments, respectively.U.S. segment as the result of a significant ongoing customer project.  There can be no assurance that the backlog amounts will ultimately be realized as revenue or that we will earn a profit on the backlog of orders, but we expect that substantially all of the sales in our backlog will be realized in 2014.2017.

There have been several recent changes in the competitive landscape.  In September, National Oilwell Varco, Inc. announced plans to spin off its distribution business as a separate standalone public company (DistributionNOW).  In addition, Marubeni-Itochu, a venture between two of Japan’s largest trading houses, agreed to buy Sooner, Inc., the largest U.S. distributor of pipe and tubing (OCTG) for the oil and gas industry.  Finally, in November, Sumitomo, a large Japanese conglomerate, acquired Edgen Group, further expanding Sumitomo’s global presence in the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors.

29


The following table shows key industry indicators for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011:

2014:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

Average Rig Count (1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

1,761 

 

1,919 

 

1,875 

 

509 

 

978 

 

1,862 

 

Canada

359 

 

364 

 

422 

 

130 

 

192 

 

379 

 

Total North America

2,120 

 

2,283 

 

2,297 

 

639 

 

1,170 

 

2,241 

 

International

1,296 

 

1,234 

 

1,167 

 

955 

 

1,167 

 

1,337 

 

Total Worldwide

3,416 

 

3,517 

 

3,464 

 

1,594 

 

2,337 

 

3,578 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Commodity Prices (2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WTI crude oil (per barrel)

$           97.98

 

$           94.05

 

$           94.91

 

$           43.29

 

$           48.66

 

$           93.17

 

Brent crude oil (per barrel)

$         108.56

 

$         111.63

 

$         111.26

 

$           43.67

 

$           52.32

 

$           98.97

 

Natural gas ($/Mcf)

$             3.73

 

$             2.75

 

$             4.00

 

$             2.52

 

$             2.62

 

$             4.37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well Counts (1)

35,676 

 

36,824 

 

N/A

 

Average Monthly U.S. Well Permits (3)

5,871 

 

5,251 

 

5,811 

 

2,360 

 

3,783 

 

6,348 

 

3:2:1 Crack Spread (4)

$           23.57

 

$           29.34

 

$           25.11

 

$           15.07

 

$           20.12

 

$           19.04

 

_______________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Source-Baker Hughes (www.bakerhughes.com) (Total rig count includes oil, natural gas and other rigs.)

(1) Source-Baker Hughes (www.bakerhughes.com) (Total rig count includes oil, natural gas and other rigs.)

(1) Source-Baker Hughes (www.bakerhughes.com) (Total rig count includes oil, natural gas and other rigs.)

(2) Source-Department of Energy, EIA (www.eia.gov)

(2) Source-Department of Energy, EIA (www.eia.gov)

 

 

 

(2) Source-Department of Energy, EIA (www.eia.gov)

 

 

 

(3) Source-Rig Data (U.S.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4) Source-Bloomberg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2630


 


 

Results of Operations for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 

The breakdown of our sales by sector for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 was as follows (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2016

 

2015

 

2014

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Upstream

$         2,314.9

 

44% 

 

$         2,534.7

 

46% 

 

$    2,257.7

 

47% 

$              884

 

29% 

 

$           1,729

 

38% 

 

$       2,806

 

47% 

Midstream

1,491.0 

 

29% 

 

1,526.2 

 

27% 

 

1,269.5 

 

26% 
1,165 

 

38% 

 

1,485 

 

33% 

 

1,655 

 

28% 

Downstream and other industrials

1,424.9 

 

27% 

 

1,509.9 

 

27% 

 

1,305.2 

 

27% 

Downstream

992 

 

33% 

 

1,315 

 

29% 

 

1,472 

 

25% 

$         5,230.8

 

100% 

 

$         5,570.8

 

100% 

 

$    4,832.4

 

100% 

$           3,041

 

100% 

 

$           4,529

 

100% 

 

$       5,933

 

100% 



Year Ended December 31, 20132016 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 20122015

For the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 the following table summarizes our results of operations (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

$ Change

 

% Change

2016

 

2015

 

$ Change

 

% Change

Sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

$         3,967.6

 

$         4,238.4

 

$           (270.8)

 

(6.4%)

$            2,297

 

$            3,572

 

$           (1,275)

 

(36%)

Canada

709.4 

 

765.2 

 

(55.8)

 

(7.3%)
243 

 

333 

 

(90)

 

(27%)

International

553.8 

 

567.2 

 

(13.4)

 

(2.4%)
501 

 

624 

 

(123)

 

(20%)

Consolidated

$         5,230.8

 

$         5,570.8

 

$           (340.0)

 

(6.1%)

$            3,041

 

$            4,529

 

$           (1,488)

 

(33%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

$            280.1

 

$            358.3

 

$             (78.2)

 

(21.8%)

$                   6

 

$                (47)

 

$                 53

 

(113%)

Canada

20.9 

 

27.2 

 

(6.3)

 

(23.2%)
(5)

 

 

(14)

 

(156%)

International

10.8 

 

21.5 

 

(10.7)

 

(49.8%)
(57)

 

(244)

 

187 

 

(77%)

Consolidated

311.8 

 

407.0 

 

(95.2)

 

(23.4%)
(56)

 

(282)

 

226 

 

(80%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

(60.7)

 

(112.5)

 

51.8 

 

(46.0%)
(35)

 

(48)

 

13 

 

(27%)

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 -

 

(114.0)

 

114.0 

 

N/M

Expenses associated with refinancing

(5.1)

 

(1.7)

 

(3.4)

 

N/M

Other (expense) income

(9.1)

 

2.9 

 

(12.0)

 

N/M

Income tax expense

(84.8)

 

(63.7)

 

(21.1)

 

33.1% 

Net income

$            152.1

 

$            118.0

 

$              34.1

 

28.9% 

Other expense

 -

 

(12)

 

12 

 

(100%)

Income tax benefit

 

11 

 

(3)

 

(27%)

Net loss

(83)

 

(331)

 

248 

 

(75%)

Series A preferred stock dividends

24 

 

13 

 

11 

 

85% 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$              (107)

 

$              (344)

 

$               237

 

(69%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit

$               468

 

$               786

 

$              (318)

 

(40%)

Adjusted Gross Profit (1)

$         1,009.0

 

$         1,057.7

 

$             (48.7)

 

(4.6%)

$               523

 

$               814

 

$              (291)

 

(36%)

Adjusted EBITDA (1)

$            386.4

 

$            463.2

 

$             (76.8)

 

(16.6%)

$                 75

 

$               235

 

$              (160)

 

(68%)

 

(1)Adjusted Gross Profit and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to an equivalent GAAP measure, see pages 28-3032-34 herein.

Sales. Sales include the revenue recognized from the sales of the products we distribute, services to customerswe provide and freight billings to customers, less cash discounts taken by customers in return for their early payment of our invoices to them.payment. Our sales were $5,230.8$3,041 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016 as compared to $5,570.8$4,529 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015.  The $1,488 million decrease reflected a $24 million impact of the decline in foreign currencies in areas where we operate compared to the U.S. dollar.

U.S. Segment—Our U.S. sales decreased  $270.8$1,275 million to $3,967.6$2,297 million for 20132016 from $4,238.4 million$3,572 for 2012. The 6%2015. This 36% decrease reflected a planned $273$698 million reductiondecrease in OCTG sales resultingthe upstream sector, a $329 million decrease in the midstream sector and a $248 million decrease in the downstream sector.  The decline in the upstream sector included a $287 million impact from our strategy to rebalance our sales and inventories away from this more volatile, lower margin portionthe disposition of our business.  In addition, our line pipe sales declined $78 million as a result of our upstream and midstream customers’ decreased spending in 2013.  Our 2013 sales benefitted from the June and December 2012 and July 2013 acquisitions of the business of Chaparral Supply LLC, Production Specialty Services (“PSS”) and Flow Control which collectively contributed an incremental $160 million of sales.U.S. OCTG product line. The remaining decrease in sales 2016 as compared 2015 was caused by decreased customer spending for both maintenance, repair and operations (“MRO”) and projects, driven by lower capital spending by our customers during 2013. the sustained low oil and natural gas prices and the resulting decline in rig count.

2731


 

Canadian Segment—Our Canadian sales decreased $55.8$90 million to $709.4$243 million for 20132016 from $765.2$333 million for 2012. Over one-third2015.  This 27%decrease reflected a $79 million decrease in the upstream business also due to a decrease in customer spending. Approximately $10 million, or 11%, of the overall 7% decreasetotal decline was thea result of a decline in the weaker Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar.  The remainder of the 7% decrease was due to a longer than normal spring break-up as well as a decline in project sales particularly in the tar sands region of northern Alberta. 

International Segment—Our International sales decreased  $13.4$123 million to $553.8$501 million for 20132016 from $567.2$624 million for 2012.2015.  This $123 million, or 20%, decrease reflected the combined impact of lower project activity and deferral of MRO expenditures particularly in Norway, Australia, the Netherlands, the U.K., and Singapore.  The March 2012 and December 2013 acquisitionsimpact of the Piping Systems divisiondecline in the foreign currencies in areas where we operate outside of OneSteel (“MRC PSA”) and Flangefitt Stainless Ltdthe U.S. dollar accounted for $29 million in incremental revenues.  Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, sales declined $43$14 million, or 8%11%, reflecting weaker demand particularly in parts of Australia where we experienced reduced customer spending in the mining and oil and gas sectors.  Over 40% of this $43 million decrease was a result of a decrease in the Australian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar.total decline. 

Gross Profit. Our gross profit was $954.8$468 million (18.3%(15.4% of sales) for the year ended December 31, 20132016 as compared to $1,013.7$786 million (18.2%(17.4% of sales) for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015.  The $318 million decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction in sales volumes.  In addition, gross profit dollarsfor 2016 was drivennegatively impacted by $45 million of inventory-related charges to reduce the decreasecarrying value of certain excess and obsolete inventory items to their realizable value. Gross profit for 2016 benefited modestly from lower product costs reflected in our last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) inventory costing methodology.  LIFO resulted in a reduction of cost of sales discussed above.of $14 million and $53 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.  Excluding the impact of LIFO and the inventory-related charges, gross profit percentage improved 20 basis points as a result of sales mix changes including the elimination of our lower margin OCTG product line. 

Certain purchasing costs and warehousing activities (including receiving, inspection, and stocking costs), as well as general warehousing expenses, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and not in cost of sales. As such, our gross profit may not be comparable to others who may include these expenses as a component of costs of goods sold. Purchasing and warehousing activities costs approximated $37.2$30 million and $34.8$37 million for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012, respectively.2015.  

Adjusted Gross Profit. Adjusted Gross Profit decreased to $1,009.0$523 million (19.3%(17.2% of sales) for 20132016 from $1,057.7$814 million (19.0%(18.0% of sales) for 2012,2015,  a decrease of $48.7$291 million. Adjusted Gross Profit for 2016 included the impact of the $45 million of inventory-related charges discussed above.  Adjusted Gross Profit is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted Gross Profit as sales, less cost of sales, plus depreciation and amortization, plus amortization of intangibles, and plus or minus the impact of our last-in, first-out (“LIFO”)LIFO inventory costing methodology. We present Adjusted Gross Profit because we believe it is a useful indicator of our operating performance without regard to items, such as amortization of intangibles, that can vary substantially from company to company depending upon the nature and extent of acquisitions they have been involved in.acquisitions. Similarly, the impact of the LIFO inventory costing method can cause results to vary substantially from company to company depending upon whether they elect to utilize the LIFO method and depending upon which method they may elect. In particular, we believe that Adjusted Gross Profit is a useful indicator of our operating performance because Adjusted Gross Profit measures our Company’s operating performance without regard to acquisition transaction-related amortization expenses. We use Adjusted Gross Profit as a key performance indicator in managing our business. We believe that gross profit is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to Adjusted Gross Profit.

The following table reconciles Adjusted Gross Profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, with our gross profit, as derived from our consolidated financial statements (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

2013

 

of Revenue

 

2012

 

of Revenue

2016

 

of Revenue

 

2015

 

of Revenue

Gross profit, as reported

$            954.8

 

18.3% 

 

$         1,013.7

 

18.2% 

$              468

 

15.4% 

 

$              786

 

17.4% 

Depreciation and amortization

22.3 

 

0.4% 

 

18.6 

 

0.3% 
22 

 

0.7% 

 

21 

 

0.5% 

Amortization of intangibles

52.1 

 

1.0% 

 

49.5 

 

0.9% 
47 

 

1.6% 

 

60 

 

1.3% 

Decrease in LIFO reserve

(20.2)

 

(0.4%)

 

(24.1)

 

(0.4%)
(14)

 

(0.5%)

 

(53)

 

(1.2%)

Adjusted Gross Profit

$         1,009.0

 

19.3% 

 

$         1,057.7

 

19.0% 

$              523

 

17.2% 

 

$              814

 

18.0% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses. Costs such as salaries, wages, employee benefits, rent, utilities, communications, insurance, fuel and taxes (other than state and federal income taxes) that are necessary to operate our branch and corporate operations are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.SG&A. Also contained in this category are certain items that are nonoperationalnon-operational in nature, including certain costs of acquiring and integrating other businesses. Our SG&A expenses were $643.0$524 million (12.3%(17.2% of sales) for the year ended December 31, 20132016 as compared to $606.7$606 million (10.9%(13.4% of sales) for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Approximately $242015.  SG&A for 2016 and 2015 included $20 million and $14 million, respectively, of severance and restructuring charges resulting from cost reduction efforts. SG&A for 2016 also included $15 million of expense related to the $36implementation of a new information technology system in the international segment as compared to $9 million increaseof expense in 2015.  The full year 2016 reflected a $6million favorable impact from foreign exchange rates compared to the full year of 2015.  Excluding these amounts, SG&A decreased $88 million which was attributable to volume-related declines and the incremental SG&A expensescost reduction efforts we have made.

32


Goodwill and Intangibles Asset Impairment.In December 2015, because of the continued decline in commodity prices and activity levels, we performed an assessment of current market conditions and our future long-term expectations of oil and gas markets and concluded it was more likely than not that the fair values of our March and December 2012 and July 2013 acquisitions of MRC PSA, PSS and Flow Control.reporting units were lower than their carrying values.  Our 2013 SG&A also reflects $5 million of expenses associated with the accelerated recognition of stock based compensation triggered by the November 2013 sale of common stockassessment took into consideration, among other things, significant further reductions in projected spending by our private equity sponsor,customers in 2016 and a more pessimistic long-term outlook for the price of oil and natural gas, and the resulting impact on our 2016 budget and long-term financial forecast.   As a result of this assessment, we completed an interim goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2015.  This test resulted in an impairment charge of $292 million comprised of $109 million in our U.S. reporting unit and $183 million in our International reporting unit.  No such charges were incurred in 2016.

As a result of these same factors, we performed impairment tests of other intangible assets as well as,  a $2and incurred impairment charges of $128 million chargerelated to our indefinite-lived trade name within our U.S. segment and $42 million related to the separation of an executive officer, and expensescustomer base intangible assets within our International segment.    No such charges were incurred in the integration of our Australian business.2016.

Operating IncomeLoss. Operating incomeloss was $311.8$56 million for the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, as compared to operating income of $407.0$282 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease2015,  an improvement of $95.2$226 million.

28


U.S. Segment—Operating income for ourOur U.S. segment decreased to $280.1had operating income of $6 million for 2013 from $358.3 2016 as compared to an operating loss of $47million for 2012. The2015.  Excluding the $237 million of goodwill and intangible asset impairments in 2015, the decline of $78.2$184 million was primarily driven by lower revenue due to decreased customer spending offset by a decrease in sales combined with  an increasereduction in SG&A expenses.  In addition, severance and restructuring expenses associated with our acquisitions of PSS and Flow Control.inventory-related charges negatively impacted operating income by $22 million and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Canadian Segment—Operating income for ourOur Canadian segment decreased to $20.9incurred an operating loss of  $5 million for 2013 from $27.2 2016 as compared to operating income of  $9million for 2012.2015. The declinedecrease of $6.3$14 million was driven by a decreasereflected the decline in sales offset in part, by a corresponding decreasereductions in SG&A expenses.&A.  Severance and restructuring expenses and inventory-related charges negatively impacted operating income by $6 million and $1million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

International SegmentOperating income for ourOur International segment decreased to $10.8incurred an operating loss of $57 million for 2013 from $21.52016 as compared to an operating loss of $244 million in 2012. The $10.72015.  Excluding the $225 million declineof goodwill and intangibles impairment charges in 2015, the $38 million decrease was drivena result of lower sales offset by a declinecorresponding reductions in sales as well as an increase in SG&A&A. Severance and restructuring expenses including costs incurred inand inventory-related charges negatively impacted operating income by $37 million and $7 million for the integration of our Australian operations.  years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Interest Expense. Our interest expense was $60.7$35 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016 as compared to $112.5$48 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015.  The decrease can be attributed to lower average debt levels in interest expense was due to the November 2012 redemption of our 9.5% senior secured notes, which was funded by borrowings on our lower cost Term Loan B and revolving credit facilities as well as the November 2013 Term Loan re-pricing.  We also benefitted from an outstanding debt balance that was lower, on average in 2013 by approximately $278 million as compared to 2012.2016.

Other Income (Expense). During November 2013, we incurred expenses of $5.1 million related to the re-pricing of our Term Loan B.  In addition, we recognized $12.9 million of foreign currency losses due primarily to the weaker Australian and Canadian dollars as compared to the U.S. dollar.  These losses were offset by gains on derivative transactions of $4.7 million.  During 2012, in various transactions, we purchased $188.7 million of our senior secured notes in the open market. In November 2012, we redeemed the remaining $861.3 million of senior secured notes outstanding. The purchase and redemption of the senior secured notes resulted in a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $114.0 million. In March 2012, we refinanced certain of our credit facilities. As a result of their termination, we wrote off and expensed $1.7 million in debt issuance costs.  In December 2012, we incurred $4.4 million of expense when we terminated a defined benefit pension plan in the Netherlands.

Income Tax Expense.Our income taxother expense was $84.8decreased to $0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to $63.72016 from $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2015.  In 2015, other expense included $5 million of expense related to the disposition of our U.S. OCTG product line, a $3 million write off of debt issuance costs, foreign currency losses of $3 million, and a $3 million charge related to a litigation matter.  In 2016, we had no such charges.

Income Tax Benefit. Our income tax benefit was $8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to benefit of  $11 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our effective tax rates were 35.8%9% and 35.1%3% for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015,  respectively. These rates generally differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% principally as a result of different tax rates in foreign tax jurisdictions and certain deductions and credits allowable for income tax purposes, partially offset by state and local income taxes and increases to the valuation allowance ondiffering, generally lower, foreign income tax rates.   The 2016 effective tax rate of 9% was lower than our deferredcustomary effective tax assets. 

During 2013 we increased the deferred tax liability on our existing temporary differences by $3.1 million to recognize a higher rate at which we expect deferred taxes in certain U.S. states to be realized.  Additionally, as a result of cumulativethe mix of pre-tax losses incurred overin all segments, including an increase in the three year period ended December 31, 2013relative significance of pre-tax losses in certain of our foreign jurisdictions where the losses have no corresponding tax benefit.  The 2015 effective tax rate of 3% was lower than our customary effective tax rate primarily due to the a non-tax deductible impairment charge combined with tax expense related to provisions for valuation allowanceallowances and the mix of $7.7 million has been recordedincome and losses in order to measure only the portion of deferred tax assets that more likely than not will be realized.various jurisdictions in which we operate.

Net IncomeLoss. Our net incomeloss was $152.1$83 million for the year ended December 31, 20132016 as compared to net income$331 million for the year ended December31, 2015, an improvement of $118.0$248 million. 

Adjusted EBITDA.  Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $75 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase2016, as compared to $235 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our Adjusted EBITDA decreased  $160 million over that period primarily as a result of $34.1 million.the factors noted above.

Adjusted EBITDA.We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangibles and certain other expenses, including non-cash expenses, (such as gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt,equity-based compensation, severance and restructuring, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and goodwill impairment)asset impairments, including inventory) and plus or minus the impact of our LIFO inventory costing methodology. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $386.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to $463.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our Adjusted EBITDA decreased $76.8 million over that period primarily due to the decrease in gross profit and other factors noted above.

33


We believe adjustedAdjusted EBITDA provides investors a helpful measure for comparing our operating performance with the performance of other companies that have different financing and capital structures or tax rates. We believe that net income is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA.

29


The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, with our net income,loss, as derived from our consolidated financial statements (in millions):



 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2016

 

2015

Net loss

$                 (83)

 

$               (331)

Income tax benefit

(8)

 

(11)

Interest expense

35 

 

48 

Depreciation and amortization

22 

 

21 

Amortization of intangibles

47 

 

60 

Decrease in LIFO reserve

(14)

 

(53)

Inventory-related charges

40 

 

 -

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 -

 

462 

Equity-based compensation expense

12 

 

10 

Severance and restructuring charges

20 

 

14 

Loss on disposition of non-core product lines

 -

 

Foreign currency losses

 

Write off of debt issuance costs

 

Litigation matter

 -

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

(1)

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$                 75

 

$               235



 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

Net income

$             152.1

 

$             118.0

Income tax expense

84.8 

 

63.7 

Interest expense

60.7 

 

112.5 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 -

 

114.0 

Expenses associated with refinancing

5.1 

 

1.7 

Depreciation and amortization

22.3 

 

18.6 

Amortization of intangibles

52.1 

 

49.5 

Decrease in LIFO reserve

(20.2)

 

(24.1)

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

(4.7)

 

(2.2)

Equity-based compensation expense

15.5 

 

8.5 

Executive separation expense (cash portion)

0.8 

 

 -

Insurance charge

2.0 

 

 -

Pension settlement

 -

 

4.4 

Foreign currency losses (gains)

12.9 

 

(0.8)

Other expense (income)

3.0 

 

(0.6)

Adjusted EBITDA

$             386.4

 

$             463.2

34

 


Year Ended December 31, 20122015 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 20112014

For the years ended December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 the following table summarizes our results of operations (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

$ Change

 

% Change

2015

 

2014

 

$ Change

 

% Change

Sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

$         4,238.4

 

$         3,849.2

 

$            389.2

 

10.1% 

$            3,572

 

$            4,427

 

$              (855)

 

(19%)

Canada

765.2 

 

653.6 

 

111.6 

 

17.1% 
333 

 

633 

 

(300)

 

(47%)

International

567.2 

 

329.6 

 

237.6 

 

72.1% 
624 

 

873 

 

(249)

 

(29%)

Consolidated

$         5,570.8

 

$         4,832.4

 

$            738.4

 

15.3% 

$            4,529

 

$            5,933

 

$           (1,404)

 

(24%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

$            358.3

 

$            166.5

 

$            191.8

 

115.2% 

$                (47)

 

$               266

 

$              (313)

 

(118%)

Canada

27.2 

 

17.4 

 

9.8 

 

56.3% 

 

28 

 

(19)

 

(68%)

International

21.5 

 

10.7 

 

10.8 

 

100.9% 
(244)

 

 

(252)

 

N/M

Consolidated

407.0 

 

194.6 

 

212.4 

 

109.1% 
(282)

 

302 

 

(584)

 

(193%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

(112.5)

 

(136.8)

 

24.3 

 

(17.8%)
(48)

 

(62)

 

14 

 

(23%)

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

(114.0)

 

 -

 

(114.0)

 

N/M

Expenses associated with refinancing

(1.7)

 

(9.5)

 

7.8 

 

(82.1%)

Other (expense) income

2.9 

 

7.5 

 

(4.6)

 

(61.3%)

Income tax expense

(63.7)

 

(26.8)

 

(36.9)

 

137.7% 

Net income

$            118.0

 

$              29.0

 

$              89.0

 

306.9% 

Other expense

(12)

 

(14)

 

 

(14%)

Income tax benefit (expense)

11 

 

(82)

 

93 

 

(113%)

Net (loss) income

(331)

 

144 

 

(475)

 

N/M

Series A preferred stock dividends

13 

 

 -

 

13 

 

N/M

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

$              (344)

 

$               144

 

$              (488)

 

N/M

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit

$               786

 

$            1,018

 

$              (232)

 

(23%)

Adjusted Gross Profit (1)

$         1,057.7

 

$            849.6

 

$            208.1

 

24.5% 

$               814

 

$            1,120

 

$              (306)

 

(27%)

Adjusted EBITDA (1)

$            463.2

 

$            360.5

 

$            102.7

 

28.5% 

$               235

 

$               424

 

$              (189)

 

(45%)



(1)Adjusted Gross Profit and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to an equivalent GAAP measure, see pages 31-3336-38 herein.

Sales. Sales include the revenue recognized from the sales of the products we distribute, services to customers and freight billings to customers, less cash discounts taken by customers in return for their early payment of our invoices to them. Our sales were $5,570.8$4,529 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015 as compared to $4,832.4$5,933 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.2014. The $1,404 million decrease reflected a $162 million impact of the decline in foreign currencies in areas where we operate compared to the U.S. dollar.

30


U.S. Segment—Our U.S. sales increased $389.2decreased $855 million to $4,238.4$3,572 million for 20122015 from $3,849.2$4,427 million for 2011.2014. This 19% decrease reflected a $659 million, or 36%, decrease in the upstream sector, a $167 million, or 10%, decrease in the midstream sector and a modest decline in the downstream sector.  The 10% increase was due to an increasedecline in volumeall sectors reflects the decrease in customer spending related to the improved business environment, including,decline in particular, the upstream and midstream sectors, which were driven by activity levels in the oil and natural gas shale regionsprices and the resulting decline in the U.S. The acquisition of Chaparral Supply in June 2012 contributed $37.9 million to the revenue increase.rig count.   

Canadian Segment—Our Canadian sales increased $111.6decreased $300 million to $765.2$333 million for 20122015 from $653.6$633 million for 2011. The 17% increase was2014. This 47%decrease reflected a $276 million, or 53%, decrease in upstream business due to an increasea decrease in volume relatedcustomer spending.  Approximately $51 million, or 17%, of the total decline was a result of the weaker Canadian dollar relative to the improved business environment, including, in particular, the upstream sector, which was driven by activity levels in the heavy oil and oil sands regions of Canada.U.S. dollar.

International Segment—Our International sales increased $237.6decreased $249 million to $567.2$624 million for 20122015 from $329.6$873 million for 2012. Approximately $192 million2014. This 29% decrease reflected the combined impact of this increase was duelower project activity and deferral of MRO expenditures particularly in Norway, the U.K., Australia and the Netherlands. The decrease in sales included the impact of the decline in the foreign currencies in areas where we operate compared to the acquisitions of MRC PSA and MRC SPF in March 2012 and June 2011, respectively, while the remainderU.S. dollar, which accounted for $111 million, or 45%, of the increase was due to an improvement in volume in the downstream sector in Europe during 2012.total decline. 

Gross Profit. Our gross profit was $1,013.7$786 million (18.2%(17.4% of sales) for the year ended December 31, 20122015 as compared to $708.2$1,018 million (14.7%(17.2% of sales) for the year ended December 31, 2011. The 350 basis point improvement2014. Gross profit for 2015 benefited from lower product costs reflected in gross profit percentage was driven, in part, by the impact of our LIFOlast-in first-out (“LIFO”) inventory costing methodology which increased 2012 gross profit percentage by 40 basis points and decreased 2011 gross profit percentage by 150 basis points.methodology.  LIFO resulted in a reduction in cost of sales of $53 million in 2015 as compared to an increase in cost of sales of $12 million in 2014.  Excluding the impact of LIFO, as well as depreciation and amortization of intangibles, gross profit percentage improved by 140declined 120 basis points.points primarily as the result of the impact of customer pricing pressures related to the decline in oil prices and sales mix changes.

Certain purchasing costs and warehousing activities (including receiving, inspection, and stocking costs), as well as general warehousing expenses, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and not in cost of sales. As such, our gross profit may not be comparable to others who may include these expenses as a component of costs of goods sold. Purchasing and warehousing activities costs approximated $34.8$37 million and $27.3$46 million for the years ended December 31, 20122015 and 2011, respectively.2014.

35


 

Adjusted Gross Profit. Adjusted Gross Profit increaseddecreased to $1,057.7$814 million (19.0%(18.0% of sales) for 20122015 from $849.6$1,120 million (17.6%(18.9% of sales) for 2011, an improvement2014, a decrease of $208.1$306 million. Adjusted Gross Profit is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted Gross Profit as sales, less cost of sales, plus depreciation and amortization, plus amortization of intangibles, and plus or minus the impact of our LIFO inventory costing methodology. We present Adjusted Gross Profit because we believe it is a useful indicator of our operating performance without regard to items, such as amortization of intangibles, that can vary substantially from company to company depending upon the nature and extent of acquisitions they have been involved in. Similarly, the impact of the LIFO inventory costing method can cause results to vary substantially from company to company depending upon whether they elect to utilize the LIFO method and depending upon which method they may elect. In particular, we believe that Adjusted Gross Profit is a useful indicator of our operating performance because Adjusted Gross Profit measures our Company’s operating performance without regard to acquisition transaction-related amortization expenses. We use Adjusted Gross Profit as a key performance indicator in managing our business. We believe that gross profit is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to Adjusted Gross Profit.

The following table reconciles Adjusted Gross Profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, with our gross profit, as derived from our consolidated financial statements (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

 

2012

 

of Revenue

 

2011

 

of Revenue

Gross profit, as reported

$         1,013.7

 

18.2% 

 

$            708.2

 

14.7% 

Depreciation and amortization

18.6 

 

0.3% 

 

17.0 

 

0.4% 

Amortization of intangibles

49.5 

 

0.9% 

 

50.7 

 

1.0% 

(Decrease) increase in LIFO reserve

(24.1)

 

(0.4%)

 

73.7 

 

1.5% 

Adjusted Gross Profit

$         1,057.7

 

19.0% 

 

$            849.6

 

17.6% 

31




 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage



2015

 

of Revenue

 

2014

 

of Revenue

Gross profit, as reported

$              786

 

17.4% 

 

$           1,018

 

17.2% 

Depreciation and amortization

21 

 

0.5% 

 

22 

 

0.4% 

Amortization of intangibles

60 

 

1.3% 

 

68 

 

1.1% 

(Decrease) increase in LIFO reserve

(53)

 

(1.2%)

 

12 

 

0.2% 

Adjusted Gross Profit

$              814

 

18.0% 

 

$           1,120

 

18.9% 



Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses. Costs such as salaries, wages, employee benefits, rent, utilities, communications, insurance, fuel and taxes (other than state and federal income taxes) that are necessary to operate our branch and corporate operations are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Also contained in this category are certain items that are nonoperational in nature, including certain costs of acquiring and integrating other businesses. Our selling, general and administrativeSG&A expenses were $606.7$606 million (10.9%(13.4% of sales) for the year ended December 31, 20122015 as compared to $513.6$716 million (10.6%(12.1% of sales) for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase2014.  Included within our 2015 SG&A expenses were $14 million of $93.1 severance and restructuring charges resulting from cost reduction efforts as well as $5million was largely dueof incremental expense related to additional personnelour MSD Engineering and Hypteck acquisitions.  Included within our 2014 SG&A expenses were $8 million of severance and related costs such as headcount increases, overtime and incentives directly$6 million of charges related to the overall increase in business actives as well ascancellation of certain executive employment agreements, $3 million of which represents the acquisitionaccelerated recognition of MRC PSA, which hadequity-based compensation expense.  Excluding these amounts, SG&A expensesdecreased $115 million.  Approximately $37 million of $34.4 million during 2012, combined withthe decrease was due to the impact of incremental expensesweaker foreign currencies in the countries in which we operate relative to the U.S. dollar.  The remaining decrease was attributable to volume-related declines and the cost reduction efforts we have made.

Goodwill and Intangibles Asset Impairment.In December 2015, because of approximately $5.9the continued decline in commodity prices and activity levels, we performed an assessment of current market conditions and our future long-term expectations of oil and gas markets and concluded it was more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units were lower than their carrying values.  Our assessment took into consideration, among other things, significant further reductions in projected spending by our customers in 2016 and a more pessimistic long-term outlook for the price of oil and natural gas, and the resulting impact on our 2016 budget and long-term financial forecast.   As a result of this assessment, we completed an interim goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2015.  This test resulted in an impairment charge of $292 million for MRC SPF which was acquiredcomprised of $109 million in June 2011.our U.S. reporting unit and $183 million in our International reporting unit.

As a result of these same factors, we performed impairment tests of other intangible assets as well and incurred impairment charges of $128 million related to our indefinite-lived trade name within our U.S. segment and $42 million related to the customer base intangible assets within our International segment.

Operating (Loss) Income. Operating incomeloss was $407.0$282 million for the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, as compared to operating income of $194.6$302 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an improvement2014, a decrease of $212.4$584 million.

U.S. Segment—Operating income for ourOur U.S. segment increased to $358.3incurred an operating loss of $47 million for 2012 from $166.52015 as compared to operating income of $266 million for 2011. The improvement2014. Excluding the $237 million of $191.8goodwill and intangible asset impairment, the decline of $76 million was driven by an  increase inlower sales due to decreased customer spending offset by an increasea reduction in SG&A expenses.  Severance expenses as a result of an increase in additional personnel costs directly related tonegatively impacted operating income by $6 million and $7 million for the overall increase in business activity. years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Canadian Segment—Operating income for our Canadian segment increaseddecreased to $27.2$9 million for 20122015 from $17.4$28 million for 2011.2014. The improvementdecrease of $9.8$19 million was driven by an increasereflected the decline in sales offset by an increasecorresponding reductions in SG&A&A.  Severance expenses as a result of an increase in additional personnel costs directly related tonegatively impacted operating income by $1 million for the overall increase in business activity.  years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

International SegmentOperating income for ourOur International segment increased to $21.5incurred an operating loss of $244 million for 2012 from $10.72015 as compared to operating income of $8 million in 2011. The $10.82014. Excluding the $225 million improvement of goodwill and intangibles impairment charges, the $27 million decrease

36


was driven by an improvement ina result of lower sales that was largely offset by an increasecorresponding reductions in SG&A&A. Severance expenses that was principallynegatively impacted operating income by $7 million and $3 million for the result of our March 2012 acquisition of MRC PSA.years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Interest Expense. Our interest expense was $112.5$48 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015 as compared to $136.8$62 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.2014.  The decrease can be attributed to lower average debt levels in interest expense2015.  During 2015, total debt was primarily due to a reduction of our weighted average interest rate. In a series of transactions from June to September 2012, we purchased in the open market $188.7reduced by $930 million in principal amount of our 9.50% senior secured notes due 2016 using our lower interest rate global asset-based lending facility (“Global ABL Facility”) to fund the purchases. In November 2012, we redeemed the remaining $861.3with $355 million of senior secured notes utilizingnet proceeds from a new lower rate $650 million term loan (“Term Loan”) togetherour June 2015 Preferred Stock issuance combined with a draw under our Global ABL Facility.positive cash flows from operations.

Other Income (Expense). During 2012, in various transactions, we purchased $188.7 million of our senior secured notes in the open market. In November 2012, we redeemed the remaining $861.3 million of senior secured notes outstanding. The purchase and redemption of the senior secured notes resulted in a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $114.0 million. In March 2012, we refinanced certain of our credit facilities. As a result of their termination, we wrote off and expensed $1.7 million in debt issuance costs.

Income Tax Expense.Our income taxother expense was $63.7decreased to $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to $26.82015 from $14 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.2014. In 2015, other expense included $5 million of expense related to our disposition of the OCTG business, a $3 million write off of debt issuance costs and foreign currency losses of $3 million as compared to a foreign currency loss of $3 million and a $1 million loss on the change of fair value derivatives in 2014.  Additionally, the 2015 expenses included a $3million charge related to a litigation matter while the 2014 expenses included a $6 million charge related to the sale of our Canadian progressive captivity pump business as well as a $4 million charge related to the loss on the disposition of our rolled and welded business.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense).Our income tax benefit was $11 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to expense of $82 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our effective tax rates were 35.1%3% and 48.0%36% for the years ended December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. These rates generally differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% principally as a result of state income taxes and differing, generally lower, foreign income tax rates. The 2011change in the effective income tax rate between fiscal year 2015 and 2014 was primarily due to a non-tax deductible goodwill impairment charge during the last quarter of 48.0% includes adjustments made2015, tax expense during fiscal year 2015 related to provision for valuation allowances and the mix of income and losses in the fourth quarter of $4.0 millionvarious tax jurisdictions in deferred income tax expense required to recognize a higher rate at which we expect certain deferred taxes in the Netherlands and Canada to be realized, and an additional $3.9 million in current income tax expense related to the taxation of our foreign operations primarily caused by a geographic shift in taxable income in different jurisdictions.operate. 

Net (Loss) Income. Our net incomeloss was $118.0$331 million for the year ended December 31, 20122015 as compared to net income of $29.0$144 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an improvement2014, a decrease of $89.0$475 million.

Adjusted EBITDA.  Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $235 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $424 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our Adjusted EBITDA decreased $189 million over that period primarily as a result of the factors noted above.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangibles and certain other expenses, including non-cash expenses, (such as gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt,equity-based compensation, severance and restructuring, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and goodwill impairment)asset impairments, including inventory) and plus or minus the impact of our LIFO inventory costing methodology. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $463.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to $360.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our Adjusted EBITDA increased $102.7 million over that period primarily due to the increase in gross profit and other factors noted above.

We believe adjustedAdjusted EBITDA provides investors a helpful measure for comparing our operating performance with the performance of other companies that have different financing and capital structures or tax rates. We believe that net income is the financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that is most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA.

3237


 

The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, with our net (loss) income, as derived from our consolidated financial statements (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2012

 

2011

Net income

$             118.0

 

$               29.0

Income tax expense

63.7 

 

26.8 

Interest expense

112.5 

 

136.8 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

114.0 

 

 -

Expenses associated with refinancing

1.7 

 

9.5 

Depreciation and amortization

18.6 

 

17.0 

Amortization of intangibles

49.5 

 

50.7 

(Decrease) increase in LIFO reserve

(24.1)

 

73.7 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

(2.2)

 

(7.0)

Equity-based compensation expense

8.5 

 

8.4 

Legal and consulting expenses

(1.2)

 

9.9 

Joint venture termination

 -

 

1.7 

Pension settlement

4.4 

 

 -

Foreign currency gains

(0.8)

 

(0.6)

Other expense (income)

0.6 

 

4.6 

Adjusted EBITDA

$             463.2

 

$             360.5

 

 

 

 



 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2015

 

2014

Net (loss) income

$               (331)

 

$               144

Income tax (benefit) expense

(11)

 

82 

Interest expense

48 

 

62 

Depreciation and amortization

21 

 

22 

Amortization of intangibles

60 

 

68 

(Decrease) increase in LIFO reserve

(53)

 

12 

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

462 

 

 -

Equity-based compensation expense

10 

 

Severance and restructuring charges

14 

 

Loss on disposition of non-core product lines

 

10 

Foreign currency losses

 

Write off of debt issuance costs

 

 -

Litigation matter

 

 -

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

Cancellation of executive employment agreements (cash portion)

 -

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$               235

 

$               424



 

 

 

Financial Condition and Cash Flows

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the periods indicated below (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2013

 

2012

 

2011

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net cash provided by (used in):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

$                   323.6

 

$                   240.1

 

$                 (102.9)

$                      253

 

$                      690

 

$                    (106)

Investing activities

(69.4)

 

(183.0)

 

(48.0)
16 

 

(41)

 

(362)

Financing activities

(265.0)

 

(60.5)

 

140.6 
(226)

 

(599)

 

467 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$                   (10.8)

 

$                     (3.4)

 

$                   (10.3)

$                        43

 

$                        50

 

$                        (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash

$                     (1.1)

 

$                     (5.6)

 

$                       0.3



Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $323.6$253 million in 2013,2016 compared to net cash$690 million provided by operating activities of $240.1 millionoperations in 2012. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, working capital decreased $125.3 million2015.    The decrease in 2013 (from 2012) as compared to an increase of $49.1 million in 2012 (from 2011).  The $83.5 million increase in net cash provided by operations was aprimarily the result of this reduction in working capital offset byreduced profitability combined with a reduction in net income when adjusted for non-cash items suchthe pace of working capital contraction in response to slowing sales. Excluding cash, working capital decreased $316 million in 2016 (from 2015) as the $114.0compared to a decrease of $588 million charge associated with the redemption of our senior secured notes in 2012.2015 (from 2014).  The current year decline in working capital was impacted most significantly by a $141 million and $128 million reduction in 2013 was the result of managing the businessinventory and accounts receivable, respectively, caused by declining sales levels.  We continue to meet the needs of theactively manage our working capital to an appropriate level given current business level.market conditions.

33


Net cash provided by operating activities was $240.1$690 million in 2012,2015 compared to net cash$106 million used in operating activities of $102.9operations in 2014.  The $796 million increase in 2011. The net cash provided by operations was primarily the result of an increase in net income of $89.0 million due to the improved business environment in our U.S, Canada, and International segments and slower growth inreduced working capital including accounts receivable and inventory in particular.requirements.  Excluding the impact of acquisitions, working capital grew $49.1decreased $543 million in 20122015 (from 2011)2014) as compared to $194.4an increase of $289 million in 20112014 (from 2010)2013).  The slower growth of2015 decline in working capital was impacted most significantly by a $419 million and $412 million reduction in 2012inventory and accounts receivable, respectively, caused by declining sales levels. 

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities was $16 million in 2016, compared to net cash used in investing activities of  $41 million in 2015.  The $57 million increase in cash provided by investing activities is the result of growing$48 million in proceeds from the businessdisposition of our U.S. OCTG product line.  Our capital expenditures were $33 million and $39 million for the years ended December 31,2016 and 2015, respectively.We expect capital expenditures in 2011 in preparation2017 to meet the demand of anticipated business levels in 2012.be approximately $32 million.

Investing Activities

38


Net cash used in investing activities was $69.4$41 million in 2013,2015, compared to $183.0$362 million in 2012.2014.  The $113.6$321 million decrease in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the smaller acquisitions of Flow ControlStream AS, MSD Engineering Pte. Limited, and Flangefitt that occurred in 2013,Hypteck AS which required cash of $46.8$344 million as compared to the 2012 acquisitions of MRC PSA, PSS and Chaparral Supply which required cash of $152.4 million.in 2014. Our capital expenditures as a percentage of sales were 0.4%$39 million in 20132015 and 0.5%$20 million in 2012. We believe that this level of2014. The 2015 increase in capital expenditures is typical for our business.

Net cash used in investing activities was $183.0 million in 2012, compared to $48.0 million in 2011. The $135.0 million increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily dueattributable to the 2012 acquisitionsour implementation of MRC PSA, PSS and Chaparral Supply. Our capital expenditures as a percentage of sales were 0.5% in 2012 and 0.4% in 2011.new information technology system within our international segment. 

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $265.0$226 million in 2013,2016, compared to $60.5 net cash used in financing activities of $599million in 2012. In 2013, we used cash of $412.0 million to repay our revolving credit facility, which was offset by the $150 million increase in our Term Loan in the November 2013 re-pricing.  In 2012, we received net proceeds of $333.3 million from our initial public offering and $644 million at closing from borrowings under our $650 million Term Loan. We used $1.1 billion to redeem our outstanding senior secured notes with proceeds from borrowings under2015.    Net repayments on our Global ABL Facility as well astotaled $0 million in 2016, compared to $673 million in the 2015.   In addition, in the fourth quarter of 2016, we repaid $100 million of our Term Loan.Loan using available cash on hand.  In 2011, financing activities provided $140.62016, we used $95 million which was substantially comprisedand $24million to fund purchases of our common stock and dividends on our preferred stock, respectively.  In June 2015, we received $355 million of net proceeds related to the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock.  We used these proceeds to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings onunder our revolving credit facilities used to fund growth in working capital.Term Loan and our Global ABL Facility. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity consist of cash generated from our operating activities, existing cash balances and borrowings under our existing Global ABL Facility. At December 31, 2016, our total liquidity, including cash on hand, was $534 million.  Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from our operating activities is primarily dependent on our sales of products to our customers at profits sufficient to cover our fixed and variable expenses. As of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of $25.2$109 million and $37.1$69 million, respectively. As of December 31, 20132016 and 2012, $21.9 2015, $61million and $27.9$51 million of our cash and cash equivalents were maintained in the accounts of our various foreign subsidiaries and, if those amounts were transferred among countries or repatriated to the U.S., those amounts may be subject to additional tax liabilities, which would be recognized in our financial statements in the period during which the transfer decision was made. We currently have the intent and ability to permanentlyindefinitely reinvest the cash held by our foreign subsidiaries, hold, and there are currently no plans for the repatriation of those amounts.

Our primary credit facilities consist of a seven-year $793.5 million Term Loan maturing in November 2019 with an original principal amount of $794million and a five-year $1.25$1.05 billion Global ABL Facility maturing in March 2017. The Global ABL Facilitythat provides for borrowings of up toa $977 million facility in the United States, $170a $30 million facility in Norway, a $20 million facility in Canada, $12a $10 million facility in Australia, a $5 million facility in the United Kingdom, $75a $4 million in Australia, $9 millionfacility in the Netherlands and $7a $4 million facility in Belgium.  The Global ABL matures in July 2019.  The Global ABL Facility contains an accordion feature that allows us to increase the principal amount of the facility by up to $300 million.million, subject to additional lender commitments. As of December 31, 2013,2016,  we had $776.9 no outstanding borrowings and $425million availableof Excess Availability, as defined  under this Global ABL Facility,Facility.    Availability is dependent on a borrowing base comprised of a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory which represented approximately a $347.3 million increase in availability under similar facilities atis subject to redetermination from time to time.  As of December 31, 2012. The acquisition of Stream AS in January 2014 reduced our availability by approximately $246 million.2016, there was $414 million outstanding under the Term Loan, which matures on November 9, 2019.

Our credit ratings are below “investment grade” and, as such, could impact both our ability to raise new funds as well as the interest rates on our future borrowings. Our existing obligations restrict our ability to incur additional debt. We were in compliance with the covenants contained in our various credit facilities as of and during the year ended December 31, 2013.2016.  

We believe our sources of liquidity will be sufficient to satisfy the anticipated cash requirements associated with our existing operations for at least the next twelve months. However, our future cash requirements could be higher than we currently expect as a result of various factors. Additionally, our ability to generate sufficient cash from our operating activities depends on our future performance, which is subject to general economic, political, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. We may from time to time seek to raise additional debt or equity financing in the public or private markets, based on market conditions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise any such financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. We may also seek, from time to time, depending on market conditions, to refinance certain categories of our debt, and we may seek to consummate equity offerings. Any such transaction would be subject to market conditions, compliance with all of our credit agreements, and various other factors.

In November 2015, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program for common stock up to $100 million, which was increased in November 2016 to $125 million.  The program is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2017.  The shares may be repurchased at management’s discretion in the open market.  Depending on market conditions and other factors, these repurchases may be commenced or suspended from time to time without prior notice.  In 2016, we purchased 6,861,191 shares of common stock at a total cost of $95 million.  In total under this plan, we have purchased 7,677,580 shares at a total cost of $107 million.

3439


 

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our minimum payment obligations as of December 31, 20132016 relating to long-term debt, interest payments, capital leases, operating leases, purchase obligations and other long-term liabilities for the periods indicated (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More Than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More Than

 

Total

 

2014

 

2015-2016

 

2017-2018

 

5 Years

 

Total

 

2017

 

2018-2019

 

2020-2021

 

5 Years

Long-term debt (1)

 

$             986.8

 

$                 7.9

 

$               16.0

 

$             215.5

 

$             747.4

 

$                414

 

$                    8

 

$                406

 

 

 

$                     -

Interest payments (2)

 

242.4 

 

43.7 

 

86.1 

 

81.4 

 

31.2 

 

58��

 

21 

 

37 

 

 -

 

 -

Foreign exchange forward contracts

 

(4.6)

 

(4.6)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Capital leases

 

1.9 

 

0.6 

 

0.5 

 

0.2 

 

0.6 

Operating leases

 

148.2 

 

41.3 

 

57.5 

 

32.7 

 

16.7 

 

185 

 

40 

 

55 

 

36 

 

54 

Purchase obligations (3)

 

508.3 

 

508.3 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

180 

 

180 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Foreign exchange forward contracts

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Other long-term liabilities

 

14.0 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

14.0 

 

24 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

24 

Total

 

$          1,897.0

 

$             597.2

 

$             160.1

 

$             329.8

 

$             809.9

 

$                861

 

$                249

 

$                498

 

$                  36

 

$                  78



(1)     Long-term debt is based on debt outstanding onat December 31, 2013.2016.  

(2)     Interest payments are based on interest rates in effect at December 31, 20132016 and assume contractual amortization payments.

(3)     Purchase obligations reflect our commitments to purchase PVF products in the ordinary course of business. While our vendors often allow us to cancel these purchase orders without penalty, in certain cases cancellations may subject us to cancellation fees or penalties, depending on the terms of the contract.

We historically have been an acquisitive company. We expect to fund future acquisitions primarily from (i) borrowings, either the unused portion of our facilities or new debt issuances, (ii) cash provided by operations, or (iii) the issuance of additional equity in connection with the acquisitions.

Other Commitments

In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and others, we are contingently liable for performance under standby letters of credit and bid, performance and surety bonds. We were contingently liable for approximately $39.9$61 million of standby letters of credit, trade guarantees that banks issue and bid, and performance and surety bonds at December 31, 2013.2016. Management does not expect any material amounts to be drawn on these instruments.

Legal Proceedings

Asbestos Claims.  We are one of many defendants in lawsuits that plaintiffs have brought seeking damages for personal injuries that exposure to asbestos allegedly caused. Plaintiffs and their family members have brought these lawsuits against a large volume of defendant entities as a result of the various defendants’ manufacture, distribution, supply or other involvement with asbestos, asbestos-containing products or equipment or activities that allegedly caused plaintiffs to be exposed to asbestos. These plaintiffs typically assert exposure to asbestos as a consequence of third-party manufactured products that the Company’s subsidiary, McJunkin Red Man Corporation,MRC Global (US) Inc., purportedly distributed. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we are a named defendant in approximately 279510 lawsuits involving approximately 9301,130 claims.  No asbestos lawsuit has resulted in a judgment against us to date, with the majority being settled, dismissed or otherwise resolved. Applicable third-party insurance has substantially covered these claims, and insurance should continue to cover a substantial majority of existing and anticipated future claims. Accordingly, we have recorded a liability for our estimate of the most likely settlement of asserted claims and a related receivable from insurers for our estimated recovery, to the extent we believe that the amounts of recovery are probable.



We annually conduct analyses of our asbestos-related litigation to estimate the adequacy of the reserve for pending and probable asbestos-related claims. Given these estimated reserves and existing insurance coverage that has been available to cover substantial portions of these claims, we believe that our current accruals and associated estimates relating to pending and probable asbestos-related litigation likely to be asserted over the next 15 years are currently adequate. This belief, however, relies on a number of assumptions, including: 



·

That our future settlement payments, disease mix and dismissal rates will be materially consistent with historic experience;

35


·

That future incidences of asbestos-related diseases in the U.S. will be materially consistent with current public health estimates;

·

That the rates at which future asbestos-related mesothelioma incidences result in compensable claims filings against us will be materially consistent with its historic experience;

40


·

That insurance recoveries for settlement payments and defense costs will be materially consistent with historic experience;

·

That legal standards (and the interpretation of these standards) applicable to asbestos litigation will not change in material respects;

·

That there are no materially negative developments in the claims pending against us; and

·

That key co-defendants in current and future claims remain solvent.

If any of these assumptions prove to be materially different in light of future developments, liabilities related to asbestos-related litigation may be materially different than amounts accrued or estimated. Further, while we anticipate that additional claims will be filed in the future, we are unable to predict with any certainty the number, timing and magnitude of such future claims. In our opinion, there are no pending legal proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Other Legal Claims and Proceedings. From time to time, we have been subject to various claims and involved in legal proceedings incidental to the nature of our businesses. We maintain insurance coverage to reduce financial risk associated with certain of these claims and proceedings. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these claims and proceedings. However, in our opinion, there are no material pending legal proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business,consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.statements. See also “Note 15—16—Commitments and Contingencies” to the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013.2016.  

Product Claims. From time to time, in the ordinary course of our business, our customers may claim that the products that we distribute are either defective or require repair or replacement under warranties that either we or the manufacturer may provide to the customer. These proceedings are, in the opinion of management, ordinary and routine matters incidental to our normal business. Our purchase orders with our suppliers generally require the manufacturer to indemnify us against any product liability claims, leaving the manufacturer ultimately responsible for these claims. In many cases, state, provincial or foreign law provides protection to distributors for these sorts of claims, shifting the responsibility to the manufacturer. In some cases, we could be required to repair or replace the products for the benefit of our customer and seek our recovery from the manufacturer for our expense. In theour opinion, of management, the ultimate disposition of these claims andthere are no pending legal proceedings is not expectedthat are likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.statements.



Weatherford Claim.  In addition to PVF, our Canadian subsidiary, Midfield Supply (“Midfield”), now known as MRC Canada, also distributed progressive cavity pumps and related equipment (“PCPs”) under a distribution agreement with Weatherford Canada Partnership (“Weatherford”) within a certain geographical area located in southern Alberta, Canada.  Commencing in late 2005 and into early 2006, Midfield hired new employees, including individuals who left Weatherford, as part of Midfield’s desire to expand its PVF business into northern Alberta.  Shortly thereafter, many of these employees left Midfield and formed a PCP manufacturing, distribution and service company named Europump Systems Inc. (“Europump”) in 2006.  The distribution agreement with Weatherford expired in 2006.  Midfield supplied Europump with PVF products that Europump distributed along with sales of PCP pumps.  In April 2007, Midfield purchased Europump’s distribution branches and began distributing and servicing Europump PCPs.  In 2014, the Company divested its PCP business to Europump, which Halliburton Corporation subsequently purchased.



Pursuant to a complaint that Weatherford filed on April 11, 2006 in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial Bench of Edmonton (Action No. 060304628), Weatherford sued Europump, three of Europump’s part suppliers, Midfield, certain current and former employees of Midfield, as well as other entities related to these parties, asserting a host of claims including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of confidential information related to the PCPs, unlawful interference with economic relations and conspiracy.  The Company denies these allegations and contends that Midfield’s expansion and subsequent growth was the result of fair competition. 



From 2006 through 2012, the case focused largely on Weatherford’s questioning of defense witnesses.  In 2013, the defendants began substantive questioning of Weatherford and its witnesses.  Discovery is ongoing and expected to last through 2014. early 2017. In April 2016, the court dismissedtwosuppliers from the case.  Weatherford has appealed this dismissal. The case is scheduled for trial inMarch 2018. 



Due to ongoing discovery, andWhile the limited information available related to any claimed damages, we cannot reasonably estimate potential loss at this time.  The Company believes Weatherford’s claims are without merit and intendswe intend to defend against them vigorously.vigorously, in November 2015, the Company filed with the Court a formal offer of settlement for$2million plus one half of the Weatherford party’s costs and interest under theJudgment Interest Act.  Weatherford declined to accept the offer. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had recorded a reserve of $3 million associated with this claim.

41


 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any material “off-balance sheet arrangements” as such term is defined within the rules and regulations of the SEC.

36


Critical Accounting Estimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP.U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. To apply these principles, management must make judgments and assumptions and develop estimates based on the best available information at the time. Actual results may differ based on the accuracy of the information utilized and subsequent events. The notes to our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this report describe our accounting policies. These critical accounting policies could materially affect the amounts recorded in our financial statements. We believe the following describes significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

ImpairmentInventories:Our U.S. inventories are valued at the lower of Long-Livedcost (principally using the LIFO method) or market. We record an estimate each quarter, if necessary, for the expected annual effect of inflation and estimated year-end inventory balances. These estimates are adjusted to actual results determined at year-end. Our inventories that are held outside of the U.S., totaling $164 million and $242 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were valued at the lower of weighted-average cost or estimated net realizable value.  

Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of inventory are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even though these costs may have been incurred at significantly different values. Since the Company values most of its inventory using the LIFO inventory costing methodology, a rise in inventory costs has a negative effect on operating results, while, conversely, a fall in inventory costs results in a benefit to operating results.

We determine reserves for inventory based on historical usage of inventory on-hand, assumptions about future demand and market conditions.  Customers rely on the company to stock specialized items for certain projects and other needs.  Therefore, the estimated carrying value of inventory depends upon demand driven by oil and gas spending activity, which in turn depends on oil and gas prices, the general outlook for economic growth worldwide, political stability in major oil and gas producing areas, and the potential obsolescence of various inventory items we sell.  Because of the sustained low oil and gas prices, we incurred inventory-related charges totaling $45 million during the third quarter of 2016. These charges reflect adjustments necessary to reduce the carrying value of certain products determined to be excess or obsolete to their estimated net realizable value based on our current market outlook for those products.  This amount includes $24 million in the International segment primarily related to a restructuring of our Australian business and market conditions in Iraq.  In addition, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory were increased in the U.S. and Canada by $16 million and $5 million in 2016, respectively.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets: Our long-lived assets consist primarily of amortizableWe record goodwill and intangible assets whichin conjunction with acquisitions that we make. These assets comprise approximately 13%41% of our total assets as of December 31, 2013. These2016.  We record goodwill as the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets are recordedthat we acquire.  We record intangible assets at fair value at the date of acquisition and are amortizedamortize the value of intangible assets over theirthe assets’ estimated useful lives.lives unless we determine that an asset has an indefinite life.  We make significant judgments and estimates in both calculating the fair value of these assets as well asand determining their estimated useful lives. The carrying values of our goodwill and intangible assets, by reporting unit, were as follows as of December 31, 2016 (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



U.S. Eastern Region and Gulf Coast

 

U.S. Western Region

 

Canada

 

International

 

Total

Customer base intangibles

$            159

 

$            101

 

$                6

 

$              13

 

$            279

Indefinite lived trade name

81 

 

51 

 

 -

 

 -

 

132 

Goodwill

289 

 

152 

 

 -

 

41 

 

482 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:

Our long-lived assets consist primarily of:

·

customer base intangibles; and

·

property, plant and equipment.

The carrying value of these assets is subject to an impairment test when events or circumstances indicate a possible impairment.  These circumstances would include significant decreases in our operating results and significant changes in market demand for our products and services. When events orand circumstances indicate a possible impairment, we assess recoverability from future operations using an undiscounted cash flow analysis, derived from the lowest appropriate asset group.    If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, we would recognize an impairment charge to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the fair value.   During 2013, 2012

42


We group customer base intangible assets on a basis consistent with our reporting units. We determine the fair value of customer base intangibles using a discounted cash flow analysis.  The most significant factor in the determination of the fair value of our customer base intangibles is forecasted sales to our customers including, in particular, our largest customers.   Possible indicators of impairment could include the following:

·

prolonged decline in commodity oil and natural gas prices,

·

the resulting decline in activity levels of many of our major customers,

·

significant reductions in capital spending budgets of our customers; and

·

a pessimistic outlook for the price of oil and natural gas.

Although we determined there were no impairments in 2016, significant decreases in our forecasted sales, particularly with our largest customers, could result in future impairments of our customer base intangible assets.

The carrying value of property, plant and 2011,equipment as of December 31, 2016 was $135 million, or 6% of total assets.  This amount was comprised of $92 million, $20 million and $23 million in our U.S., Canada and International segments, respectively.  We group property, plant and equipment and evaluate it for recoverability at a country or regional level.  We determine the fair value of property, plant and equipment based on appraisal procedures which involve both market and cost techniques depending on the nature of the specific assets and the availability of market information.  In 2016, no indicators of property, plant and equipment impairment existed.were present.  Based on the nature of our property, plant and equipment and the reduction in carrying value each year through depreciation, we believe future impairments are not likely.

When testing for the impairment of the value of long-lived assets, we make forecasts of:

·

our future operating results,

·

the extent and timing of future cash flows,

·

working capital,

·

profitability; and

·

sales growth trends. 

We make these forecasts using the best available information at the time, including information regarding current market conditions and customer spending forecasts.  While we believe our assumptions and estimates are reasonable, because of the volatile nature of the energy industry, actual results may differ materially from the projected results.results which could result in the recognition of additional impairment charges. Factors that could lead to actual results differing materially from projected results include, among other things, further reductions of oil and natural gas prices and changes in projected sales growth rates. 

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets: OurWe test goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets comprise approximately 27% of our total assets as of December 31, 2013. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. We evaluate goodwill for impairment at threefour reporting units that mirror our three reportable segments (U.S., Eastern Region and Gulf Coast, U.S. Western Region, Canada and International). Within each reporting unit, we have elected to aggregate the component countries and regions into a single reporting unit based on their similar economic characteristics, products, customers, suppliers, methods of distribution and the manner in which we operate each segment. We perform our annual tests for indications of goodwill impairment as of October 1stof each year, updating on an interim basis should indications of impairment exist.

TheWhen we perform the goodwill impairment test, compareswe compare the carrying value of the reporting unit that has the goodwill with the estimated fair value of that reporting unit. If the carrying value is more than the estimated fair value, thea second step is performed, wherebyperformed.  In the second step, we calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. ImpairmentWe recognize impairment losses are recognized to the extent that recorded goodwill exceeds implied goodwill. Our impairment methodology uses discounted cash flow and multiples of cash earnings valuation techniques, plusacquisition control premium and valuation comparisons to similar businesses. These valuationbusinesses to determine the fair value of a reporting unit.  Each of these methods involves Level 3 unobservable market inputs and require us to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding:

·

future operating results,

·

the extent and timing of future cash flows,

·

working capital,

·

sales prices,

·

profitability,

·

discount rates; and

·

sales growth trends. 

43


We make these forecasts using the best available information at the time including information regarding future operatingcurrent market conditions and customer spending forecasts.  While we believe that these assumptions and estimates are reasonable, because of the volatile nature of the energy industry, actual results may differ materially from the extentprojected results which could result in the recognition of additional impairment charges.  Factors that could lead to actual results differing materially from projected results include, among other things:

·

reduction of oil and natural gas prices,

·

changes in projected sales growth rate; and

·

changes in factors affecting our discount rate including risk premiums, risk free interest rates and costs of capital. 

In connection with our annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1, 2016, we tested the carrying value of goodwill for our U.S. and timingInternational reporting units.  Our Canada reporting unit has no goodwill.  No goodwill impairments were indicated as a result of future cash flows, working capital, sales prices, profitability, discount rates and growth trends. No impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011those tests as the estimated fair value of each of our three reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying values. While we believe that such assumptions and estimates are reasonable, the actual results may differ materially from the projected results.value.

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are testedrecorded in our U.S. segment.  We test these assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. This test compares the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets with their estimated fair value. If the carrying value is more than the estimated fair value, we recognize impairment losses are recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value. Our impairment methodology uses discounted cash flow and estimated royalty rate valuation techniques. TheseUtilizing these valuation methods, require us towe make certain assumptions and estimates regarding regarding:

·

future operating results,

·

sales prices,

·

discount rates; and

·

sales growth trends.

As with the goodwill impairment test described above, while we believe that our assumptions and estimates are reasonable, because of the volatile nature of the energy industry, actual results sales prices, discount rates and growth trends.may differ materially from the projected results which could result in the recognition of additional impairment charges.  No impairment charges were recognized during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, as the2016.  The estimated fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets substantially exceeded their carrying value. While we believe that such assumptions and estimates are reasonable, the actual results may differ materially from the projected results.

Income Taxes: We use the liability method for determining our income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds received. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

37


In determining the need for valuation allowances and our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, we consider and make judgments regarding all the available positive and negative evidence, including the timing of the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, estimated future taxable income, ongoing, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies and recent financial results of operations.  The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable however could be adjusted in the future if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present in certain jurisdictions and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth. 

Our tax provision is based upon our expected taxable income and statutory rates in effect in each country in which we operate. We are subject to the jurisdiction of numerous domestic and foreign tax authorities, as well as to tax agreements and treaties among these governments. Determination of taxable income in any jurisdiction requires the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events such as the amount, timing and character of deductions, permissible revenue recognition methods under the tax law and the sources and character of income and tax credits. Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, foreign currency exchange restrictions or our level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount of income taxes we provide during any given year.

A tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including any related appeals or litigation processes, on the basis of the technical merits. We adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Because of the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which the new information is available.

44


We classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions as income taxes in our financial statements. We intend to permanently reinvest certain earnings of our foreign subsidiaries in operations outside of the U.S., and accordingly, we have not provided for U.S. income taxes on such earnings.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 

Interest Rate Risk

As of December 31, 2013,2016, all of our outstanding debt was at floating rates. These facilities prescribe the percentage point spreads from U.S. prime, LIBOR, Canadian prime and EURIBOR. Our facilities generally allow us to fix the interest rate, at our option, for a period of 30 to 180 days.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, a 1% increase in the LIBOR rate would result in an increase in our interest expense of approximately $9.9$3 million per year if the amounts outstanding under our Term Loan and Global ABL Facility remained the same for an entire year.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

Our operations outside of the U.S. expose us to foreign currency exchange rate risk, as these transactions are primarily denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, our functional currency. Our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates is managed primarily through the use of forward foreign exchange contracts. These contracts increase or decrease in value as foreign exchange rates change, protecting the value of the underlying transactions denominated in foreign currencies. All currency contracts are entered into for the sole purpose of hedging existing or anticipated currency exposure; we do not use foreign currency contracts for trading or speculative purposes. The terms of these contracts generally do not exceed one year. We record all changes in the fair market value of forward foreign exchange contracts in income. We recorded gains related to foreign currency contracts of $4.7$1 million $0.2 millionin the year ended December 31, 2016 and $0.1losses related to foreign currency contracts of $1 million in the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

Steel Prices

Our business is sensitive to steel prices, which can impact our product pricing, with steel tubular prices generally having the highest degree of sensitivity. While we cannot predict steel prices, we manage this risk by managing our inventory levels, including maintaining sufficient quantity on hand to meet demand, while reducing the risk of overstocking.

3845


 


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 



 



 

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of MRC Global Inc. and Subsidiaries::

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

F-1

Reports of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

F-4

Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014

F-7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 , 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014

F-8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-9



 

3946


 


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by the Exchange Act, we maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20132016 and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2013.2016.  

Pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have provided certain certifications to the Securities and Exchange Commission. These certifications are included herein as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.Reporting 

The Company’s management report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page F-1 of this annual report and is incorporated herein by reference.

Attestation Report of our Registered Public Accounting Firm.Firm 

The Company’s registered public accounting firm’s attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page F-2 of this annual report and is incorporated herein by reference.

Changes in Internal ControlControls Over Financial Reporting

There

The Company has undertaken a multi-year enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) project to migrate certain systems to SAP software.  During the second quarter of 2016, we completed the SAP implementation in our Asia Pacific-based businesses. As a part of this implementation, various controls over financial reporting for the region changed. During the third quarter of 2016, we began a similar implementation effort in our European, Nordic and Middle Eastern businesses which will be completed in 2017.

Other than described above, there were no changes in the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter covered by this report2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION



On February 18, 2014, we entered into a new employment agreement (each an “Agreement”) with each of James E. Braun and Daniel J. Churay (each an “Executive”), which Agreement amends and restates the prior agreement between us and each Executive. Each Agreement has an initial term of one year, which will automatically be extended on February 18, 2015, and each subsequent anniversary for one additional year, unless either party gives ninety days’ written notice of non-renewal. Each Agreement provides for an annual base salary of $475,000 for Mr. Braun and $400,000 for Mr. Churay. The Executive’s base salary will be reviewed annually by the Board (or a committee of the Board) and may be adjusted upward at its discretion.

Each Executive is entitled to receive annual cash incentive compensation to be based upon individual or Company performance criteria that the Board establishes for each fiscal year, with a target annual cash incentive equal to 75% the Executive’s base salary for the relevant fiscal year. The Executive’s target annual cash incentive will be reviewed annually by the Board (or a committee of the Board) and may be adjusted upward at its discretion.

Each Agreement provides that the Executive will be eligible to receive on an annual basis long-term incentive awards in such amounts as the Board (or a committee of the Board) determines in its discretion on terms and conditions, including time and performance based vesting conditions that are generally applicable to other senior executives of the Company.

Each Agreement also provides for certain severance payments and benefits following a termination of employment under certain circumstances. Pursuant to the terms of each Agreement, if the Executive’s employment is terminated for any reason, including his voluntary resignation, the Executive is entitled to receive all accrued, but unpaid, obligations including any base salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination, any earned but unpaid annual cash incentive compensation for completed fiscal years and any unreimbursed expenses and any other unpaid accrued benefits (collectively referred to as the “Accrued Amounts”).

40


If the Executive’s employment is terminated other than for “Cause”, death or “Disability” or if the Executive resigns for “Good Reason”, (each of those terms as defined in each Agreement), in each case other than in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in each Agreement), the Executive is entitled to the following additional severance payments and benefits:

None.

monthly payments equal to 1/12th of base salary at the rate in effect immediately prior to termination and 1/12th of target annual cash incentive compensation for 18 months following termination;

Company paid premiums towards continuation of medical, dental and vision benefits for 18 months; and

pro-rata annual cash incentive compensation for the fiscal year in which termination occurs, based on actual performance through the end of the fiscal year.



In addition, if prior to a Change in Control or after the 24-month period following a Change in Control, the Executive’s employment is terminated other than for “Cause”, death or “Disability” or if he resigns for “Good Reason”, all outstanding equity awards will continue to vest for the next 18-month period as if the Executive remained an active employee. At the end of this 18-month period, any unvested equity awards will be immediately forfeited.  These payments and the provision of benefits are generally subject to the execution of a release within 30 days of termination of employment and compliance with restrictive covenants prohibiting competition, solicitation of employees and interference with business relationships during employment and thereafter for 18 months (or 24 months if the Executive is entitled to the Change in Control benefits described below) following termination. In addition, the Executive is subject to perpetual restrictive covenants regarding confidentiality, non-disparagement and proprietary rights.



If, within 24 months following a Change in Control, the Executive’s employment its terminated other than for Cause, death or Disability or if the Executive resigns for Good Reason, the Executive is entitled to the following severance payments and benefits:

the Accrued Amounts;

payment, on the 30th day following the termination, of an amount equal to the sum of 24 months of base salary and two times the target annual cash incentive compensation in effect on the date of termination;

Company paid premiums towards continuation of medical, dental and vision benefits for 24 months; and

immediate vesting of all outstanding equity awards.

These payments and the provision of benefits are generally subject to the execution of a release within 30 days of termination of employment.



If the Executive is terminated due to the Executive’s death or Disability, the Executive (or the Executive’s estate, if applicable) is entitled to receive the following severance payments and benefits:

the Accrued Amounts; and

pro-rata annual cash incentive compensation for the fiscal year in which termination occurs, based on actual performance through the end of the fiscal year.

The Agreement does not provide any “gross-up” payments to pay state, federal or other taxes as a result of payments the Company makes to the Executive under each Agreement.



A copy of the form of Agreement is filed as Exhibit 10.5 to this Annual Report.



 

4147


 

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

The information regarding our directors and nominees for director required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K will be presented under the heading “Proposal I—Proposal to Elect Directors”“PROPOSAL I: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” in our Proxy Statement prepared for the solicitation of proxies in connection with our annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 29, 2014May 2, 2017 (“Proxy Statement”), which information is incorporated by reference herein.

Information regarding our executive officers required by Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K is presented at the end of Part I herein and captioned “Executive Officers of the Registrant” as permitted by General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K and Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K.

Information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K will be included under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

Information required by paragraphs (c)(3), (d)(4) and (d)(5) of Item 407 of Regulation S-K will be included under the heading “Questions“QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING” and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting” and “Corporate Governance and Board Matters”“CORPORATE GOVERNANCE” in our Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers (“Code of Ethics for Senior Officers”) that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics for Senior Officers, together with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters for each of our board committees, and our Code of Ethics applicable to all employees are available on our Internet website at www.mrcglobal.com. We will provide, free of charge, a copy of our Code of Ethics or any of our other corporate documents listed above upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at 2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin1301 McKinney Street, Suite 3100,2300, Houston, Texas, 77010. We intend to disclose any amendments to or waivers of the Code of Ethics for Senior Officers on behalf of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Controller, and persons performing similar functions on our Internet website at www.mrcglobal.com under the Investor Relations page, promptly following the date of any such amendment or waiver.

ITEM  11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by Item 402 and paragraphs (e)(4) and (e)(5) of Item 407 of Regulations S-K regarding executive compensation will be presented under the headings “Compensation  Discussion and  Analysis,” “Employment and Other Agreements,” “Summary Compensation Table for 2013,2016,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2013,2016,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at 20132016 Fiscal Year-End,” “Option Exercises and Stock VestingVested During 2013,2016,Nonqualified“Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2013,2016,” “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control,” “Non-Employee Director Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the information provided under the heading “Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation”Report” in our Proxy Statement is furnished and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is not subject to the liabilities of that section and is not deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act.

4248


 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information regarding the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by Item 403 of Regulation  S-K will be presented under the heading “Security Ownership of Officers and Directors” and “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters”Owners” in our Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2013,2016, relating to our equity compensation plans pursuant to which grants of options, restricted stock, or certain other rights to acquire our shares may be granted from time to time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

(c)

Plan Category

Number of securities to
be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights

 

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))

 

Number of securities to
be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights

 

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options and restricted stock

4,027,568 
$
20.47 
1,470,219 

Stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance share unit awards

6,041,828 $21.71 2,573,803 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

None

N/A

None

None

N/A

None



ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 

The information regarding certain relationships and related transactions required by Item 404 and Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K will be presented under the headings “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”, “Related Party Transaction Policy”, “Corporate Governance,” “Board and  Board Matters,Committees,” “Board of Directors,” “Director Independence” and “Committees of the Board” in our Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM  14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 

The information regarding our principal accounting fees and services required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A will be presented under the headings “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” and “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors” in our Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

 

4349


 

PART IV

ITEM  15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 

(a)Documents Filed as Part of this Annual Report:

1.Financial Statements.  

See “Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

2.Financial Statement Schedules.  

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required or the information is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

3.List of Exhibits.  

 



 

Exhibit Number

Description

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MRC Global Inc. dated April 11, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on April 17, 2012).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of MRC Global Inc. dated November 7, 2013. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on November 13, 2013).

3.3

Certificate of Designations, Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock of MRC Global Inc.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on June 11, 2015).

10.1

Second Amended and Restated Loan, Security and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2012,July 18, 2014, among MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation,Corporation), Greenbrier Petroleum Corporation, McJunkin Red Man Development Corporation, Midway–TristateMidway-Tristate Corporation, Milton Oil & Gas Company, MRC Management Company, Ruffner Realty Company and The South Texas Supply Company, Inc., as U.S. Borrowers and Guarantors, MRC Global Inc., as a Guarantor, MRC Global Australia Pty Ltd. (f/k/a MRC Transmark Pty Ltd and MRC SPF Pty Ltd.Ltd), as Australian Borrowers,Borrower, MRC Transmark NV, as a Belgian Borrower, Midfield SupplyMRC Global (Canada) ULC (f/k/a MRC Canada ULC), as a Canadian Borrower, MRC Transmark B.V. and MRC Transmark International B.V., as Dutch Borrowers,Borrower, MRC Transmark Holdings UKGlobal Norway AS (each of MRC Solberg & Andersen AS, MRC Energy Piping AS and MRC Teamtrade AS were merged with and into MRC Global Norway AS), as Norwegian Borrower, MRC Flangefitt Limited, MRC Transmark Limited and MRC Transmark (Dragon) Limited and MRC SPF Scanfit Limited, as UK Borrowers, any other Borrower party thereto from time to time and certain Persons party thereto from time to time as Guarantors, certain financial institutions, as lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Security Trustee and Collateral Agent, and Barclays Bank PLC and Wells Fargo Capital Finance LLC, as Co-Syndication Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on March 28, 2012).Agent.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-178980), filed with the SEC on March 28, 2012).

10.1.1

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan, Security and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2012, among MRC Global Inc., McJunkin Red Man Corporation, Greenbrier Petroleum Corporation, McJunkin Red Man Development Corporation, Midway-Tristate Corporation, Milton Oil & Gas Company, MRC Management Company, Ruffner Realty Company, The South Texas Supply Company, Inc., MRC Transmark Pty Ltd, and MRC SPF Pty Ltd., MRC Transmark B.V., MRC Canada ULC (f/k/a Midfield Supply ULC), MRC Transmark B.V., and MRC Transmark International B.V., MRC Transmark Holdings UK Limited, MRC Transmark Limited, MRC Transmark (Dragon) Limited, and MRC SPF Scanfit Limited, the financial institutions party thereto constituting Required Lenders (as defined in the Loan Agreement referred to therein) and Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as collateral agent and administrative agent for itself and the other Secured Parties (as defined in the Loan Agreement referred to therein). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012)July 18, 2014).  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on June 11, 2015.)

10.1.1

Second Amendment, dated as of June 11, 2015, to the Second Amended and Restated Loan, Security and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2014, by and among MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation), Greenbrier Petroleum Corporation, McJunkin Red Man Development Corporation, Midway – Tristate Corporation, Milton Oil & Gas Company, MRC Management Company, Ruffner Realty Company and The South Texas Supply Company, Inc., as U.S. Borrowers and Guarantors, MRC Global Inc., as a guarantor, MRC Global Australia Pty Ltd. (f/k/a MRC Transmark Pty Ltd), as Australian borrower, MRC Transmark NV, as Belgian borrower, MRC Global (Canada) ULC (f/k/a MRC Canada ULC), as Canadian borrower, MRC Transmark B.V., as Dutch borrower, MRC Global Norway AS (each of MRC Solberg & Andersen AS, MRC Energy Piping AS, and MRC Teamtrade AS were merged with and into MRC Global Norway AS), as Norwegian borrower, MRC Flangefitt Limited, MRC Transmark Limited, and MRC Transmark (Dragon) Limited, as UK borrowers, any other borrowers party thereto from time to time and certain persons party thereto from time to time as guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, security trustee and collateral agent.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on June 11, 2015).

4450


 

Exhibit Number

Description

10.2

Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2012, among MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation,Corporation), as the Borrower, MRC Global Inc., as Guarantor, each other Subsidiary Guarantor from time to time party thereto, the several lenders from time to time party thereto, Banc of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Trustee, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Barclays Bank PLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, Key Bank National Association and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as Co-Managers, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Documentation Agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Barclays Bank PLC, as Co-Syndication Agents. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012).

10.2.1

Term Loan Guarantee and Acknowledgment, dated as of November 9, 2012, by each of the signatories listed on the signature pages thereto and each of the other entities that becomes a party thereto, in favor of the Administrative Agent (as defined therein) for the benefit of the Guaranteed Parties (as defined therein). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012).

10.2.2

Security Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2012, among MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation,Corporation), MRC Global Inc., each of the subsidiaries of MRC Global Inc. listed on the signature pages thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Trustee for the benefit of the Secured Parties (as defined therein). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012).

10.2.3

Term Loan Pledge Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2012, among MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation,Corporation), MRC Global Inc., each of the subsidiaries of MRC Global Inc. listed on the signature pages thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Trustee, for the benefit of the Secured Parties (as defined therein). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012).

10.2.4

Refinancing Amendment and Incremental Joinder Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2013, among MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation,Corporation), MRC Global Inc., each of the subsidiaries of MRC Global Inc. listed on the signature pages thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Trustee, for the benefit of the Secured Parties (as defined therein). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on November 20, 2013).

10.2.5

Second Amendment, dated as of June 11, 2015, relating to the Second Amended and Restated Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2015, by and among MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation), as the borrower, MRC Global Inc., as guarantor, the other subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral trustee.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on June 11, 2015).

10.3

Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2012, by and among MRC Global Inc., PVF Holdings LLC and the other parties thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.1 to Form 10-Q of MRC Global Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on May 7, 2012).

10.4†10.4.1†

Employment Agreement, dated as of May 16, 2013, by and amongbetween MRC Global Inc. and Andrew R. Lane. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of MRC Global Inc. filed with the SEC on May 17, 2013).

10.4.2†*

First Amendment to Employment Agreement between MRC Global Inc. and Andrew R. Lane.

51


Exhibit Number

Description

10.5†*

Form of Employment Agreement by and among MRC Global Inc. and each of its executive officers.

10.6†

AmendedJames E. Braun and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2011, byDaniel J. Churay, and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) and James Underhill.formerly with Rory Isaac (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.610.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (No. 333-178980), filed with the SEC on January 12, 2012).

10.6.1†

Separation Agreement and Complete Release, dated as of August 16, 2013, by and among James F. Underhill, McJunkin Red Man Corporation and MRC Global Inc.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10-K of MRC Global Inc. for the quarteryear ended September 30,December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on November 1, 2013)February 21, 2014).

45


10.6.2†10.6†

ConsultingForm of deferral amendment to the Employment Agreement dated as of August 16, 2013, by and between James F. Underhill and MRC Global Inc.Rory Isaac (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K of MRC Global Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, filed with the SEC on November 1, 2013)August 12, 2014).

10.7†

Letter Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2008, by and among H.B. Wehrle, III, PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved) and MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation.Corporation). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

10.8†

Letter Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2008, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) and Craig Ketchum. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.9†

2007 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.9.1†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation)Inc (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

10.9.2†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known(f/k/a as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Director Grant May 2010—Dutch residents). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.9.3†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Director Grant May 2010—US residents). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.10†

2007 Restricted Stock Plan, as amended.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.10.1†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Restricted Stock Award Agreement. (IncorporatedAgreement (for awards prior to 2015). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091) filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

10.11†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) 2007 Stock Option Plan (Canada). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

10.11.1†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Canada) (for plan participants who are parties to non-competition agreements). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19.1 to Amendment No. 1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

46


10.11.2†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Canada) (for plan participants who are not parties to non-competition agreements). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19.2 to Amendment No. 1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

10.12†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Deferred Compensation Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

10.13†10.12†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), filed with the SEC on March 5, 2012).

10.13.1†10.12.1†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Director Option Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (No. 333-178980), filed with the SEC on January 12, 2012).

52


10.13.2†

Exhibit Number

Description

10.12.2†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for awards prior to 2013). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (No. 333-178980), filed with the SEC on January 12, 2012).

10.13.3†10.12.3†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for awards prior to 2014). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (No. 333-178980), filed with the SEC on January 12, 2012).

10.13.4†10.12.4†

Form of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for awards prior to 2013). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (No. 333-178980), filed with the SEC on January 12, 2012).

10.13.5†10.12.5†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for 2013 awards)awards after 2012). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MRC Global Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on May 3, 2013).

10.13.6†10.12.6†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for 2013 awards)awards after 2012). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MRC Global Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on May 3, 2013).

10.13.7†*10.12.7†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.7 to Form 10-K of MRC Global Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2014).

10.13.8†*10.12.8†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Restricted Stock Award Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.8 to Form 10-K of MRC Global Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2014).

10.13.9†*10.12.9†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.9 to Form 10-K of MRC Global Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2014).

10.14†10.12.10†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (for awards for 2015). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.10 to Form 10-K of MRC Global Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on February 20, 2015.)

10.12.11†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for 2015 awards) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.10 to Form 10-K of MRC Global Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on February 20, 2015.)

10.12.12†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (for 2016 awards). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.12 to Form 10-K of MRC Global Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC on February 24, 2016).

10.12.13†

Form of MRC Global Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for 2016 and 2017 awards).  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.13 to Form 10‑K of MRC Global Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC on February 24, 2016).

10.12.14†*

Form of MRC Global Inc. Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (for 2017 awards).

53


Exhibit Number

Description

10.13†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Director Compensation Plan.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Form 10-K of MRC Global Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2014).

47


10.15†10.14†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2008, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and Andrew R. Lane. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

10.15.1†10.14.1†

Amendment to the MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2009, by and among McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation,MRC Global Inc., PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and Andrew R. Lane. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.15.2†10.14.2†

Second Amendment to the MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2009, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and Andrew R. Lane. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.15.3†10.14.3†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2009, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and Andrew R. Lane. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.15.4†10.14.4†

Amendment to the MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2009, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and Andrew R. Lane. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.16†10.15†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2008, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation,, PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and Len Anthony. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.16.1†10.15.1†

Amendment to the MRC Global Inc. (formerly known(f/k/a as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2009, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and Len Anthony. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.16.2†10.15.2†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2009, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and Len Anthony. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

10.17†10.16†

MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2009, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), PVF Holdings LLC (now dissolved), and John A. Perkins. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).

F

4854


 

10.18†Exhibit Number

Indemnification Agreement by and between the Company and Peter C. Boylan, III dated August 11, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (No. 333-173035), filed with the SEC on March 24, 2011).Description

10.1910.17

Indemnity Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2006, by and among MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation), Hg Acquisition Corp., MRC Global (US) Inc. (f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Corporation,Corporation), and certain shareholders of McJunkin Red Man CorporationMRC Global (US) Inc. named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Amendment No. 1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as(f/k/a McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) (No. 333-153091), filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008).

10.20†10.18

Form of Indemnification Agreement between MRC Global Inc. (formerly McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) and Executive Officers.Officers, Directors and Certain Employees. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.19 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-110-K of MRC Global Inc. (No. 333-178980),for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on April 4, 2012).February 20, 2015.)

10.21†10.19

Form of IndemnificationShareholders’ Agreement, dated June 10, 2015, by and between MRC Global Inc. (formerly known as McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation) and Directors.Mario Investments LLC.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.1 to Amendment No. 3 of the Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-18-K of MRC Global Inc. (No. 333-178980), filed with the SEC on April 4, 2012)June 11, 2015).

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries of MRC Global Inc.

23.1*

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1*

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32**

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

100*

The following financial information from MRC Global Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013,2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)(“XBRL”): (i) the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets at December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, (ii) the Consolidated StatementStatements of IncomeOperations for the twelve monthtwelve-month periods ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, (iii) the Consolidated StatementStatements of Comprehensive Income for the twelve monthtwelve-month periods ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, (iv) the Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows for the twelve monthtwelve-month periods ended December 31,  2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the twelve-month periods ended December 31,  2016, 2015 and (v)2014 and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

101*

Interactive data file.

101.INS*

XBRL Instance DocumentDocument.

101.SCH*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension SchemaSchema.

101.CAL*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation LinkbaseLinkbase.

101.DEF*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition LinkbaseLinkbase.

101.LAB*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label LinkbaseLinkbase.

49


101.PRE*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation LinkbaseLinkbase.

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be posted as an exhibit to this report.

*Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

5055


 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 



 



 

MRC GLOBAL INC.



 

By:

/s/    ANDREW R. LANE        

 

 

Andrew R. Lane

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: February 21, 201417, 2017 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated.

 1

 

 



 

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

 



 

 

/S/    ANDREW R. LANE        

 

Andrew R. Lane

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    JAMES E. BRAUN        

 

James E. Braun

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    ELTON  BOND        

 

Elton Bond

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

(principal accounting officer)

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    RHYS J. BEST        

 

Rhys J. Best

Lead DirectorChairman

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    LEONARD M. ANTHONY        

 

Leonard M. Anthony

Director

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    PBETERARBARA    C. BJ. DOYLANUGANIER, III        

 

Peter C. Boylan, IIIBarbara J. Duganier

Director

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    HENRY  CORNELL        

Henry Cornell

Director

February 21, 2014



 

 

/S/    CRAIG  KETCHUM        

 

Craig Ketchum

Director

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    GERARD P. KRANS        

 

Gerard P. Krans

Director

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    DR. CORNELIS  ADRIANUS  LINSE        

 

Dr. Cornelis Adrianus Linse

Director

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    JOHN A. PERKINS        

 

John A. Perkins

Director

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

 

/S/    H.B. WEHRLE, III        

 

H.B. Wehrle, III

Director

February 21, 201417, 2017

/S/    ROBERT    L. WOOD

Robert L. Wood

Director

February 17, 2017

 

5156


 

 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

MRC Global Inc.’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. MRC Global Inc.’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 framework) to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.2016. 

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP’s attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is included in this Form 10-K.

 





/S/s/    ANDREW R. LANE

 

Andrew R. Lane

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



 





/s/    JAMES E. BRAUN

 

James E. Braun

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Houston, Texas

February 21, 201417, 2017 



F-1F-1

 


 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

of MRC Global Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited MRC Global Inc. and subsidiaries’’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in “InternalInternal Control—Integrated Framework”Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). MRC Global Inc. and subsidiaries’’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express anan opinion on the Company’scompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, MRC Global Inc. and subsidiaries maintained,, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of MRC Global Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132016 of MRC Global Inc. and our report dated February 21, 201417, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas

February 21, 201417, 2017 

 

F-2F-2

 


 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

of MRC Global Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MRC Global Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of MRC Global Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the consolidated results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), MRC Global Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in “Internal Control-IntegratedControl Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 framework) and our report dated February 21, 201417, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas

February 21, 201417, 2017



 

F-3F-3

 


 

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 

MRC GLOBAL INC.

 (in millions, except shares)



 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

$                 25,188

 

$                 37,090

$                      109

 

$                        69

Accounts receivable, net

812,147 

 

823,236 
399 

 

533 

Inventories, net

971,567 

 

970,228 
561 

 

781 

Other current assets

37,091 

 

20,020 
48 

 

22 

Total current assets

1,845,993 

 

1,850,574 
1,117 

 

1,405 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

30,473 

 

37,031 
19 

 

22 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

118,923 

 

122,458 
135 

 

127 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill, net

632,284 

 

610,392 
482 

 

484 

Other intangible assets, net

708,009 

 

749,272 
411 

 

459 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$            3,335,682

 

$            3,369,727

$                   2,164

 

$                   2,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts payable

$               550,393

 

$               438,344

$                      314

 

$                      327

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

124,925 

 

125,599 
111 

 

110 

Deferred income taxes

78,844 

 

79,661 

Current portion of long-term debt

7,935 

 

6,500 

 

Total current liabilities

762,097 

 

650,104 
433 

 

445 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, net

978,899 

 

1,250,089 
406 

 

511 

Deferred income taxes

241,116 

 

261,448 
184 

 

208 

Other liabilities

15,302 

 

22,164 
23 

 

22 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.5% Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; authorized

 

 

 

363,000 shares; 363,000 shares issued and outstanding

355 

 

355 

 

 

 

Stockholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value per share: 500,000 shares authorized, 101,913 and 101,563 issued and outstanding, respectively

1,019 

 

1,016 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 100,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 -

 

 -

Common stock, $0.01 par value per share: 500 million shares authorized, 102,529,637

 

 

 

and 102,203,074 issued, respectively

 

Additional paid-in capital

1,644,406 

 

1,625,900 
1,677 

 

1,666 

Retained deficit

(266,735)

 

(418,830)
(574)

 

(467)

Treasury stock at cost: 7,677,580 and 816,389 shares, respectively

(107)

 

(12)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(40,422)

 

(22,164)
(234)

 

(232)

1,338,268 

 

1,185,922 
763 

 

956 

$            3,335,682

 

$            3,369,727

$                   2,164

 

$                   2,497

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 









F-4F-4

 


 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOMEOPERATIONS

MRC GLOBAL INC.

(in millions, except per share amounts)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Sales

$              5,230,792

 

$          5,570,858

 

$          4,832,423

Cost of sales

4,276,033 

 

4,557,115 

 

4,124,271 

Gross profit

954,759 

 

1,013,743 

 

708,152 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

642,994 

 

606,753 

 

513,563 

Operating income

311,765 

 

406,990 

 

194,589 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other (expense) income:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

(60,685)

 

(112,519)

 

(136,844)

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 -

 

(113,961)

 

 -

Expenses associated with refinancing

(5,136)

 

(1,685)

 

(9,450)

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

4,731 

 

2,186 

 

7,044 

Other, net

(13,764)

 

685 

 

429 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

236,911 

 

181,696 

 

55,768 

Income tax expense

84,816 

 

63,738 

 

26,784 

Net income

$                 152,095

 

$             117,958

 

$               28,984

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

$                       1.50

 

$                   1.22

 

$                   0.34

Diluted earnings per common share

$                       1.48

 

$                   1.22

 

$                   0.34

Weighted-average common shares, basic

101,712 

 

96,465 

 

84,417 

Weighted-average common shares, diluted

102,522 

 

96,925 

 

84,655 



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2016

 

2015

 

2014



 

 

 

 

 

Sales

$                    3,041

 

$                4,529

 

$                5,933

Cost of sales

2,573 

 

3,743 

 

4,915 

Gross profit

468 

 

786 

 

1,018 



 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

524 

 

606 

 

716 

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 -

 

462 

 

 -

Operating (loss) income

(56)

 

(282)

 

302 



 

 

 

 

 

Other expense:

 

 

 

 

 

  Interest expense

(35)

 

(48)

 

(62)

  Write off of debt issuance costs

(1)

 

(3)

 

 -

  Other, net

 

(9)

 

(14)



 

 

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

(91)

 

(342)

 

226 

Income tax (benefit) expense

(8)

 

(11)

 

82 

Net (loss) income

(83)

 

(331)

 

144 

Series A preferred stock dividends

24 

 

13 

 

 -

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

$                      (107)

 

$                 (344)

 

$                   144



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Basic (loss) earnings per common share

$                     (1.10)

 

$                (3.38)

 

$                  1.41

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share

$                     (1.10)

 

$                (3.38)

 

$                  1.40

Weighted-average common shares, basic

97.3 

 

102.1 

 

102.0 

Weighted-average common shares, diluted

97.3 

 

102.1 

 

102.8 



See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-5F-5

 


 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

MRC GLOBAL INC.

(in millions) 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

Net income

$          152,095

 

$          117,958

 

$        28,984

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

(20,348)

 

4,149 

 

(7,616)

Pension related adjustments

130 

 

25 

 

635 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income before tax

(20,218)

 

4,174 

 

(6,981)

Income tax benefit (expense) related to components of other comprehensive income

1,960 

 

(198)

 

697 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

(18,258)

 

3,976 

 

(6,284)

Comprehensive income

$          133,837

 

$          121,934

 

$        22,700



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net (loss) income

$                 (83)

 

$               (331)

 

$            144



 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

(2)

 

(95)

 

(96)

Pension related adjustments

 -

 

 -

 

(1)

Total other comprehensive loss

(2)

 

(95)

 

(97)

Comprehensive (loss) income

$                 (85)

 

$               (426)

 

$              47

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6F-6

 


 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

MRC GLOBAL INC.

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

Retained

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Earnings

 

Comprehensive

 

Stockholders'

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

(Deficit)

 

Income (Loss)

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

84,404 

 

$            844

 

$         1,274,560

 

$            (565,790)

 

$              (19,856)

 

$            689,758

Net income

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

28,984 

 

 -

 

28,984 

Foreign currency translation, net of tax

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(6,919)

 

(6,919)

Pension related adjustments, net of tax

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

635 

 

635 

Vesting of restricted stock

 

23 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

Forfeited dividends on forfeited unvested restricted stock

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

15 

 

 -

 

15 

Equity-based compensation expense

 

 -

 

 -

 

8,385 

 

 -

 

 -

 

8,385 

Exercise of stock options

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

84,427 

 

844 

 

1,282,949 

 

(536,791)

 

(26,140)

 

720,862 

Net income

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

117,958 

 

 -

 

117,958 

Foreign currency translation, net of tax

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

3,793 

 

3,793 

Pension related adjustments, net of tax

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

183 

 

183 

Common stock issued in initial public offering

 

17,046 

 

171 

 

333,171 

 

 -

 

 -

 

333,342 

Vesting of restricted stock

 

22 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Forfeited dividends on forfeited unvested restricted stock

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Equity-based compensation expense

 

 -

 

 -

 

8,475 

 

 -

 

 -

 

8,475 

Exercise of stock options

 

68 

 

 

676 

 

 -

 

 -

 

677 

Tax benefit on equity-based compensation

 

 -

 

 -

 

629 

 

 -

 

 -

 

629 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

101,563 

 

1,016 

 

1,625,900 

 

(418,830)

 

(22,164)

 

1,185,922 

Net income

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

152,095 

 

 -

 

152,095 

Foreign currency translation, net of tax

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(18,344)

 

(18,344)

Pension related adjustments, net of tax

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

86 

 

86 

Vesting of restricted stock

 

135 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Shares withheld for taxes

 

(48)

 

 -

 

(1,512)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1,512)

Forfeited restricted stock

 

 -

 

 -

 

(7)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(7)

Equity-based compensation expense

 

 -

 

 -

 

15,488 

 

 -

 

 -

 

15,488 

Exercise of stock options

 

263 

 

 

3,282 

 

 -

 

 -

 

3,285 

Tax benefit on equity-based compensation

 

 -

 

 -

 

1,261 

 

 -

 

 -

 

1,261 

Other

 

 -

 

 -

 

(6)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

101,913 

 

$         1,019

 

$         1,644,406

 

$            (266,735)

 

$              (40,422)

 

$         1,338,268



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 



 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Total



Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Treasury Stock

 

Comprehensive

 

Stockholders'



Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

(Deficit)

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

(Loss)

 

Equity



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

102 

 

$           1 

 

$            1,644 

 

$          (267)

 

 -

 

$          - 

 

$           (40)

 

$             1,338 

Net income

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

144 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

144 

Foreign currency translation

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(96)

 

(96)

Pension related adjustments

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1)

 

(1)

Equity-based compensation expense

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

Exercise of stock options

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

102 

 

 

1,656 

 

(123)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(137)

 

1,397 

Net loss

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(331)

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

(331)

Foreign currency translation

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(95)

 

(95)

Equity-based compensation expense

 -

 

 -

 

10 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

10 

Dividends declared on preferred stock

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(13)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(13)

Purchase of common stock

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1)

 

(12)

 

 -

 

(12)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

102 

 

 

1,666 

 

(467)

 

(1)

 

(12)

 

(232)

 

956 

Net loss

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(83)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(83)

Foreign currency translation

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(2)

 

(2)

Shares withheld for taxes

 -

 

 -

 

(1)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1)

Equity-based compensation expense

 -

 

 -

 

12 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

12 

Exercise of stock options

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

Tax expense on equity-based compensation

 -

 

 -

 

(1)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1)

Dividends declared on preferred stock

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(24)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(24)

Purchase of common stock

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(7)

 

(95)

 

 -

 

(95)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

102 

 

$           1 

 

$            1,677 

 

$          (574)

 

(8)

 

$    (107)

 

$         (234)

 

$                763 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-7F-7

 


 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

MRC GLOBAL INC.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

2013

 

2012

 

2011

(in millions)

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$              152,095

 

$              117,958

 

$                28,984

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

$                     (83)

 

$                   (331)

 

$                    144

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

22,338 

 

18,585 

 

17,046 
22 

 

21 

 

22 

Amortization of intangibles

52,072 

 

49,466 

 

50,652 
47 

 

60 

 

68 

Equity-based compensation expense

15,488 

 

8,475 

 

8,385 
12 

 

10 

 

Deferred income tax benefit

(19,823)

 

(20,432)

 

(16,362)
(23)

 

(87)

 

(34)

Amortization of debt issuance costs

5,777 

 

8,782 

 

10,456 

 

 

Inventory-related charges

45 

 

 -

 

 -

Write off of debt issuance costs

2,865 

 

1,685 

 

9,450 

 

 

 -

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 -

 

113,961 

 

 -

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 -

 

462 

 

 -

(Decrease) increase in LIFO reserve

(20,180)

 

(24,140)

 

73,703 
(14)

 

(53)

 

12 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

(4,731)

 

(2,186)

 

(7,044)
(1)

 

 

Provision for uncollectible accounts

(298)

 

2,428 

 

433 

 

 

Foreign currency losses (gains)

12,913 

 

(766)

 

(604)

Foreign currency losses

 

 

Other non-cash items

1,137 

 

7,727 

 

4,629 

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

2,069 

 

22,399 

 

(177,744)
128 

 

412 

 

(132)

Inventories

4,479 

 

26,674 

 

(182,173)
141 

 

419 

 

(209)

Other current assets

(23)

 

 

Income taxes payable

(7,057)

 

(12,593)

 

45,333 

 

(13)

 

13 

Other current assets

(8,738)

 

(681)

 

(35)

Accounts payable

117,320 

 

(84,380)

 

36,550 
(13)

 

(198)

 

(30)

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

(4,138)

 

7,110 

 

(4,556)
(8)

 

(40)

 

11 

Net cash provided by (used in) operations

323,588 

 

240,072 

 

(102,897)
253 

 

690 

 

(106)

 

 

 

 

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(22,068)

 

(26,189)

 

(18,056)
(33)

 

(39)

 

(20)

Proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment

4,583 

 

2,272 

 

3,087 

 

 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $2,433, $0 and $2,036

(46,794)

 

(152,367)

 

(39,865)

Proceeds from the sale of assets held for sale

 -

 

 -

 

10,594 

Other investment and notes receivable transactions

(5,130)

 

(6,755)

 

(3,795)

Net cash used in investing activities

(69,409)

 

(183,039)

 

(48,035)

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from the disposition of non-core product lines

48 

 

 -

 

 -

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $0, $0 and $4

 -

 

 -

 

(344)

Other investing activities

 -

 

(3)

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

16 

 

(41)

 

(362)

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from the sale of common stock

 -

 

333,342 

 

 -

Payments on revolving credit facilities

(2,150,188)

 

(2,422,136)

 

(2,237,449)
(41)

 

(1,343)

 

(1,501)

Proceeds from revolving credit facilities

1,738,213 

 

2,571,835 

 

2,387,877 
41 

 

670 

 

1,977 

Purchases and redemption of senior secured notes

 -

 

(1,135,223)

 

 -

Proceeds from issuance of term loan

150,000 

 

643,500 

 

 -

Payments on long-term obligations

(6,859)

 

(33,081)

 

 -

(108)

 

(258)

 

(8)

Debt issuance costs paid

(697)

 

(20,038)

 

(9,836)

 -

 

(1)

 

(4)

Purchases of common stock

(95)

 

(12)

 

 -

Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs

 -

 

355 

 

 -

Dividends paid on preferred stock

(24)

 

(10)

 

 -

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

3,285 

 

677 

 

 

 -

 

Tax benefit on stock options

1,261 

 

629 

 

 -

Other financing activities

(6)

 

 

 -

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(264,991)

 

(60,492)

 

140,595 
(226)

 

(599)

 

467 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease in cash

(10,812)

 

(3,459)

 

(10,337)

Increase (decrease) in cash

43 

 

50 

 

(1)

Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash

(1,090)

 

(5,578)

 

262 
(3)

 

(6)

 

Cash -- beginning of year

37,090 

 

46,127 

 

56,202 

Cash -- end of year

$                25,188

 

$                37,090

 

$                46,127

Cash beginning of year

69 

 

25 

 

25 

Cash end of year

$                    109

 

$                      69

 

$                      25

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

$                55,484

 

$              104,846

 

$              124,039

$                      30

 

$                      43

 

$                      57

Cash paid for (received from) income taxes

$              110,104

 

$                96,526

 

$                (1,051)

Cash paid for income taxes

$                      11

 

$                      90

 

$                    103

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



F-8F-8

 


 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MRC GLOBAL INC.

December 31, 20132016

NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business Operations:  MRC Global Inc. is a holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas. Our wholly owned subsidiaries are global distributors of pipe, valves, fittings and related products and services across each of the upstream (exploration, production and extraction of underground oil and gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and gas, gas utilities, and the storage and distribution of oil and gas) and downstream (crude oil refining and petrochemical processing and general industrials)processing) sectors. We have branches in principal industrial, hydrocarbon producing and refining areas throughout the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, Australasia, the Middle East and Australasia.Caspian. Our products are obtained from a broad range of suppliers.

Basis of Presentation:  The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MRC Global Inc. and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company” or by such terms as “we,” “our” or “us”). All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuesrevenue and expenses during the reported period. We believe that our most significant estimates and assumptions are related to estimated losses on accounts receivable, the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) inventory costing methodology, estimated realizable value on excess and obsolete inventories, goodwill, intangible assets, deferred taxes and self-insurance programs. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents: We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for losses on receivables based upon periodic evaluation of accounts that may have a higher credit risk using information available about the customer and other relevant data. This formal analysis is inherently subjective and requires us to make significant estimates of factors affecting doubtful accounts including customer specific information, current economic conditions, volume, growth and composition of the account, and other factors such as financial statements, news reports and published credit ratings. The amount of the allowance for the remainder of the trade balance is not evaluated individually but is based upon historical loss experience. Because this process is subjective and based on estimates, ultimate losses may differ from those estimates. Receivable balances are written off when we determine that the balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance when received. The provision for losses on receivables is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations.  

Inventories: Our inventories are valued at the lower of cost, principally LIFO, or market. We believe that the use of LIFO results in a better matching of costs and revenues.revenue. This practice excludes certain inventories, which are held outside of the United States, approximating $264.0$164 million and $318.9$242 million at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, which are valued at the lower of weighted-average cost or market. Our inventory is substantially comprised of finished goods.

AllowancesReserves for excess and obsolete inventories are determined based on analyses comparing inventories on hand to sales trends.activity over time. The allowance,reserve, which totaled $23.2$34 million and $19.0$30 million at December 31, 20132016 and 2012, respectively,2015, is the amount deemed necessary to reduce the cost of the inventory to its estimated realizable value.

Debt Issuance Costs: We defer costs directly related to obtaining financing and amortize them over the term of the indebtedness on a straight-line basis. The use of the straight-line method does not produce results that are materially different from those which would result from the use of the effective interest method. These amounts are reflected in the consolidated statement of operations as a component of interest expense.

In the first quarter of 2016, we adopted ASU No. 2015-03 Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 855-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.  This ASU requires that debt issuance costs are reflectedrelated to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability consistent with debt discounts.  As a result of the adoption, we have reclassified debt issuance costs associated with our Term Loan of $5 million as of December 31, 2015, from other assets and totaled $19.1 million and $25.2 million, net of accumulated amortization of $5.7 million and $4.8to long term debt in our balance sheet.  Accordingly, long term debt originally reported as $524 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.2015 has been revised to $519 million.  Debt issuance costs associated with our Global ABL Facility will continue to be presented in other assets. 

Fixed Assets: Land, buildings and equipment are stated on the basis of cost. For financial statement purposes, depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of such assets principally by the straight-line method; accelerated depreciation and cost

F-9


recovery methods are used for income tax purposes. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in income for the period. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Certain systems development costs related to the purchase, development and installation of computer software are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the related asset.  Costs incurred prior to the development stage, as well as maintenance, training costs, and general and administrative expenses are expensed as incurred.

F-9


Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired.  Goodwill isand intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. We evaluate goodwill for impairment at threefour reporting units that mirror our three segments (U.S., Eastern Region and Gulf Coast, U.S. Western Region, Canada and International). Within each reporting unit, we have elected to aggregate the component countries and regions into a single reporting unit based on their similar economic characteristics, products, customers, suppliers, methods of distribution and the manner in which we operate each reporting unit. We perform our annual tests for indications of goodwill impairment as of October 1st of each year, updating on an interim basis should indications of impairment exist.

The goodwill impairment test compares the carrying value of the reporting unit that has the goodwill with the estimated fair value of that reporting unit. If the carrying value is more than the estimated fair value, a second step is performed, whereby we then calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Impairment losses are recognized to the extent that recorded goodwill exceeds implied goodwill. Our impairment methodology uses discounted cash flow and multiples of cash earnings valuation techniques, as well asacquisition control premium and valuation comparisons to similar businesses.  These valuationEach of these methods involves Level 3 unobservable market inputs and require us to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding future operating results, the extent and timing of future cash flows, working capital, sales prices, profitability, discount rates and growth trends.  While we believe that thesesuch assumptions and estimates are reasonable, the actual results may differ materially from the projected results.

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. This test compares the carrying value of the indefinite livedindefinite-lived intangible assets with their estimated fair value. If the carrying value is more than the estimated fair value, impairment losses are recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value. Our impairment methodology uses discounted cash flow and estimated royalty rate valuation techniques. These valuationEach of these methods requireinvolves Level 3 unobservable market inputs and requires us to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding future operating results, sales prices, discount rates and growth trends. While we believe that such assumptions and estimates are reasonable, the actual results may differ materially from the projected results.

Other intangible assets primarily include trade names, customer bases and noncompetition agreements resulting from business acquisitions. Other intangible assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. Amortization is provided using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, ranging from two to twenty years.

The carrying value of amortizable intangible assets is subject to an impairment test when events or circumstances indicate a possible impairment. When events or circumstances indicate a possible impairment, we assess recoverability from future operations using undiscounted cash flows derived from the lowest appropriate asset group. If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge would be recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the fair value, which is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis. While we believe that assumptions and estimates utilized in the impairment analysis are reasonable, the actual results may differ materially from the projected results. These impairments are determined prior to performing our goodwill impairment test.

Derivatives and Hedging: From time to time, we utilize interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to potential interest rate increases. Changes in the fair values of our derivative instruments are based upon independent market quotes. We do not designate our interest rate swaps as hedging instruments; therefore, we record our interest rate swaps on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with the gains and losses recognized in earnings in the period of change.

We utilize foreign exchange forward contracts (exchange contracts) and options to manage our foreign exchange rate risks resulting from purchase commitments and sales orders. Changes in the fair values of our exchange contracts are based upon independent market quotes. We do not designate our exchange contracts as hedging instruments; therefore, we record our exchange contracts on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with the gains and losses recognized in earnings in the period of change.

Fair Value: We measure certain of our assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants

F-10


would use in pricing an asset or a liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions for inputs used in the valuation methodologies to measuring fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability (including all assumptions about risk).

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets. We do not measure these assets at fair

F-10


value on an ongoing basis; however, these assets are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment.

Our impairment methodology for goodwill and other intangible assets uses both (i) a discounted cash flow analysis requiring certain assumptions and estimates to be made regarding the extent and timing of future cash flows, discount rates and growth trends and (ii) valuation based on our publicly traded common stock. As all of the assumptions employed to measure these assets and liabilities on a nonrecurring basis are based on management’s judgment using internal and external data, these fair value determinations are classified as Level 3. We have not elected to apply the fair value option to any of our eligible financial assets and liabilities.

Insurance: We are self-insured for physical damage to automobiles that we own, lease or rent, and product warranty and recall liabilities. In addition, we maintain a nonmaterial deductibledeductible/retention program as they relateit relates to insurance for property, stock throughput, inventory, workers’ compensation, automobile liability, asbestos claims, general liability claims (including, among others, certain product liability claims for property damage, death or injury), cybersecurity claims and employee healthcare.  These programs have deductibles and self-insured retentions ranging from $25,000$0 million to $1.0$5 million and are secured by various letters of credit totaling $6.5$6 million. Our estimated liability and related expenses for claims are based in part upon estimates that insurance carriers, third-party administrators and actuaries provide. We believe that insurance reserves are sufficient to cover outstanding claims, including those incurred but not reported as of the estimation date. Further, we maintain a commercially reasonable umbrella/excess policy that covers liabilitiescoverage in excess of the primary limits.  We do not have excess coverage for physical damage to automobiles that we own, lease or rent, and product warranty and recall liabilities.  Our accrued liabilities related to all deductibles/retentions under insurance programs (other than employee healthcare) were $7.8$11 million and $5.9$10 million as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively.  In the area of employee healthcare, we have a commercially reasonable excess stop loss protection on a per person per year basis.  Reserves for self-insurance accrued liabilities for employee healthcare were $3.3 million and $4.0$3 million as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012, respectively.2015. 

Income Taxes: We use the liability method for determining our income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds received. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

In determining the need for valuation allowances and our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, we consider and make judgments regarding all the available positive and negative evidence, including the timing of the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, estimated future taxable income, ongoing, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies and recent financial results of operations.  The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be adjusted in the future if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present in certain jurisdictions and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth.

Our tax provision is based upon our expected taxable income and statutory rates in effect in each country in which we operate. We are subject to the jurisdiction of numerous domestic and foreign tax authorities, as well as to tax agreements and treaties among these governments. Determination of taxable income in any jurisdiction requires the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events such as the amount, timing and character of deductions, permissible revenue recognition methods under the tax law and the sources and character of income and tax credits. Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, foreign currency exchange restrictions or our level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount of income taxes we provide during any given year.

F-11


A tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including any related appeals or litigation processes, on the basis of the technical merits. We adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Because of the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which the new information is available. We classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions as income taxes in our financial statements.

We intend to permanentlyindefinitely reinvest certain earnings of our foreign subsidiaries in operations outside the U.S., and accordingly, we have not provided for U.S. income taxes on such earnings.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions: The functional currency of our foreign operations is the applicable local currency. The cumulative effects of translating the balance sheet accounts from the functional currency into the U.S. dollar at current exchange

F-11


rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. The balance sheet accounts (with the exception of stockholders’ equity) are translated using current exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. Stockholders’ equity is translated at historical exchange rates and revenue and expense accounts are translated using a weighted-average exchange rate during the year. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recognized in the consolidated statements of income.  operations.  

Equity-Based Compensation:  Our equity-based compensation consisted and consists of (i) restricted common units and profit units of PVF Holdings LLC, our former parent, and (ii) restricted stock, restricted unit awards, performance share unit awards and nonqualified stock options of our Company. The cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Our policy is to expense equity-based compensation using the fair-value of awards granted, modified or settled. Restricted common units, profit units and restricted stock are credited to equity as they are expensed over their vesting periods based on the grant date value of the shares vested. The fair value of nonqualified stock options is measured on the grant date of the related equity instrument using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model andmodel.  A Monte Carlo simulation is recognized as compensationcompleted to estimate the fair value of performance share unit awards with a stock price performance component.  We expense the fair value of all equity grants, including performance share unit awards, on a straight line basis over the applicable vesting period.

Revenue Recognition: Sales to our principal customers are made pursuant to agreements that normally provide for transfer of legal title and risk upon shipment. We recognize revenue as products are shipped, title has transferred to the customer and the customer assumes the risks and rewards of ownership, and collectability is reasonably assured. Freight charges billed to customers are reflected in revenues.revenue. Return allowances are estimated using historical experience. Amounts received in advance of shipment are deferred and recognized as revenue when the products are shipped and title transfers.is transferred. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis and therefore are excluded from net sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations.  

Cost of Sales: Cost of sales includes the cost of inventory sold and related items, such as vendor rebates, inventory allowances and reserves, and shipping and handling costs associated with inbound and outbound freight, as well as depreciation and amortization and amortization of intangible assets. Certain purchasing costs and warehousing activities (including receiving, inspection and stocking costs), as well as general warehousing expenses, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and not in cost of sales. As such, our gross profit may not be comparable to others that may include these expenses as a component of cost of sales. Purchasing and warehousing costs approximated $37.2$30 million, $34.8$37 million, and $27.3$46 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011, respectively.2014.  

Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per share are computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, excluding any dilutive effects of unexercised stock options, unvested restricted stock awards, unvested restricted stock units and unvested restricted stock.performance share unit awards. Diluted earnings per share are computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding including any dilutive effect of unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock. The dilutive effect of unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock is calculated under the treasury stock method. Equity awards and shares of preferred stock are disregarded in the calculations of diluted earnings per share if they are determined to be anti-dilutive.

Concentration of Credit Risk: Most of our business activity is with customers in the energy and industrial sectors.sector. In the normal course of business, we grant credit to these customers in the form of trade accounts receivable. These receivables could potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk; however, we minimize this risk by closely monitoring extensions of trade credit. We generally do not require collateral on trade receivables. We have a broad customer base doing business in many regions of the world. During 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, we did not have sales to any one customer in excess of 10% of gross sales. At those respective year-ends, no individual customer balances exceeded 10% of gross accounts receivable.

We have a broad supplier base, sourcing our products in most regions of the world. During 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, we did not have purchases from any one vendor in excess of 10% of our grossinventory purchases. At those respective year-ends no individual vendor balance exceeded 10% of gross accounts payable.

F-12


We maintain the majority of our cash and cash equivalents with several financial institutions. These financial institutions are located in many different geographical regions with varying economic characteristics and risks. Deposits held with banks may exceed insurance limits. We believe the risk of loss associated with our cash equivalents to be remote.

Segment Reporting: We have threeOur business is comprised of four operating segments: U.S. Eastern Region and reportable segments, the United States of America,Gulf Coast, U.S. Western Region, Canada and International. Our International which includes Europe, Asia,segment consists of our operations outside of the U.S. and Australasia.Canada. These segments represent our global business of providing pipe, valves, fittings and related products and servicesselling PVF to the energy and industrial sectors,sector across each of the upstream (exploration, production and extraction of underground oil and gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and gas, gas utilities, and the storage and distribution of oil and gas) and downstream (crude oil refining, petrochemical and petrochemical processing) markets, through our distribution operations located throughoutchemical processing and general industrials) markets.  Our two U.S. operating segments have been aggregated into a single reportable segment based on their economic similarities.  As a result, we report segment information for the world.U.S., Canada and International.



Reclassifications: Certain immaterial amounts in the prior years’ balance sheet and statements of cash flows have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

F-12


Recently Issued Accounting Standards:StandardsIn February 2013,May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Standards Update No. 2013-05, Parent’s AccountingASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 provides comprehensive guidance on the recognition of revenue from customers arising from the transfer of goods and services. The ASU also provides guidance on accounting for certain contract costs and requires new disclosures. The FASB voted to defer the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognitioneffective date of Certain Subsidiaries or GroupsASU 2014-09 by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period.   Accordingly, we plan to adopt the standard in the first quarter of Assets within2018. We are currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements.  For the year ended December 31, 2016, our 25 largest customers represented approximately 52% of our revenue.  We expect this group of customers will constitute a Foreign Entity orsimilar portion of an Investmentour revenue in future periods.  We are in the process of completing a formal review of our contracts with these and other customers to evaluate the impact of the new guidance and anticipate completing that review during the first half of 2017.   The balance of our revenue is derived from thousands of customers with which we generally interact in a Foreign Entity (ASU 2013-05), which specifies that a cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) should be released into earnings when an entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a consolidated foreign entity and the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity.transactional relationship where goods are purchased from our branch locations.  For sales of an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, a pro ratathis portion of CTA attributable to the investment would be recognized in earnings upon sale of the investment.  When an entity sells either a part or all of its investment in a consolidated foreign entity, CTA would be recognized in earnings only if the sale results in the parent no longer having a controlling financial interest in the foreign entity.  CTA would be recognized in earnings in aour business, combination achieved in stages.  ASU 2013-05 will be effective for us prospectively in 2014.  Wewe do not expect this updatethe guidance to have a material impact on the timing of our financial statements.revenue recognition.  We have determined that we will utilize the modified retrospective transition method.  We are still assessing the impact of the standard on our internal control processes and information systems.  However, we do not currently believe that significant modifications of our systems will be required.



In July 2013,2015, the FASB issued Standards Update No. 2013-11, Income TaxesASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 740), Presentation330): Simplifying the Measurement of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.Inventory. ASU 2015-11 provides guidance on simplifying the measurement of inventory. The objective of this updatecurrent standard is to eliminatemeasure inventory at lower of cost or market; where market could be replacement cost, net realizable value or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. ASU 2015-11 updates this guidance to measure inventory at the diversity in practicelower of cost or net realizable value; where net realizable value is considered to be the estimated selling price in the presentationordinary course of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists.  Underbusiness, less reasonably predictable cost of completion, disposal and transportation. We expect to adopt this guidance an unrecognized tax benefit,in 2017. This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which will replace the existing guidance in ASC 870, Leases.  This ASU requires a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presenteddual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee would account for leases as finance leases or operating leases.  Both finance leases and operating leases will result in the financial statements aslessee recognizing a reduction toright-of-use asset and a deferred taxcorresponding lease liability.  For finance leases, the lessee would recognize interest expense and amortization of the right-of-use asset, and for operating leases, the lessee would recognize a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward, except in certain circumstances.  straight-line total lease expense.  This update does not require any new disclosures andguidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods of public entities beginning after December 31, 2013.  The amendments15, 2018.  We are in this updatethe process of evaluating the effect of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial results.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation, which simplifies the accounting for the taxes related to stock based compensation. Under the standard, excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies will no longer be recorded in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”), and APIC pools will be applied prospectively toeliminated.  Instead, all unrecognizedexcess tax benefits that exist atand tax deficiencies will be recorded as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement.  In addition, excess tax benefits are required to be presented as operating activities rather than financing activities in the statement of cash flows.  This guidance iseffective date.  We dofor annual and interim reporting periods of public entities beginning after December 15, 2016. This amendment is not expect this updateexpected to have a material impact on ourthe Company's financial statements. position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 2—ACQUISITIONS

In 2013, we completed two acquisitions for an aggregate purchase priceAugust 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of $46.8 million.  These acquisitions included:

"

The assets and operations of Dan H. Brown, Inc., d/b/a Flow Control Products (“Flow Control”).  Flow Control is a leading provider in pneumatic and electro-hydraulic valve automation packages and related field support to the Permian Basin.

"

The assets and operations of Flangefitt Stainless Ltd.  Flangefitt, headquartered in Warrington, England, with a location in Aberdeen, Scotland, is a leading pipe, flange and fitting (PFF) distributor in the oil and gas industry in England. 

The preliminary purchase price allocationCash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of each acquisition was based on preliminary valuations. Our estimatesCertain Cash Receipts and assumptionsCash Payments. This ASU addresses the following eight specific cash flow issues: Debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are subject to change upon the receipt and review of final valuations. The goodwill recognized for the acquisitions was primarily attributableinsignificant in relation to the expected profitabilityeffective interest rate of the acquired businessesborrowing; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies (including bank-owned life insurance policies); distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and synergies expected to arise afterseparately identifiable cash flows and application of the acquisitions.  Goodwill recorded in connection with these transactionspredominance principle. This standard is deductible. The consideration paideffective for these acquisitions has been allocated as follows (in millions):fiscal years beginning

F-13

 

 


2013

Acquisitions

Net assets acquired:

Current assets, net of cash acquired

$                 18.6

Other long-term assets

1.8 

Customer base intangibles

9.7 

Other intangible assets

2.3 

Goodwill

24.7 

Current liabilities

(9.8)

Other long-term liabilities

(0.5)

Cash consideration paid

$                 46.8

 

after December 15, 2017. This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In 2012,October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The guidance requires companies to recognize the income tax effects of intercompany sales and transfers of assets, other than inventory, in the income statement as income tax expense (or benefit) in the period in which the transfer occurs. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, with early adoption permitted. The changes are required to be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded in retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company is currently assessing the impact adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amendments in ASU 2017-04 eliminate the current two-step approach used to test goodwill for impairment and require an entity to apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years, including interim periods within, beginning after December 15, 2019 (upon the first goodwill impairment test performed during that fiscal year). Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. A reporting entity must apply the amendments in ASU 2017-04 using a prospective approach. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact to its consolidated financial position,  results of operations or cash flow.

NOTE 2—TRANSACTIONS 

In February 2016, we completed the disposition of our U.S. oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) product line for $48 million. As a result of this transaction, we incurred a loss of $5 million that was reflected in our fourth quarter 2015 results.  Net of reserves, including LIFO and an adjustment to write the inventory down to its net realizable value, the carrying value of the U.S. OCTG inventories as of December 31, 2015 was $50 million.

In 2014, we completed three acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of $152.4 million.$344 million, net of cash acquired.  These acquisitions included OneSteel Piping Systems AustraliaStream AS (“MRC PSA”Stream”), a PVFleading pipe, valve and fittings distributor supplyingand provider of flow control products, solutions and services to the offshore oil and gas mining and mineral processing industries in Australia,industry on the assets of Chaparral Supply with support in the Mississippian Lime formation in Oklahoma and Kansas, and the assets and operations of Production Specialty Services, Inc.Norwegian Continental Shelf, MSD Engineering Pte. Limited (“PSS”), a PVF distributor in the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford shale regions of Texas and New Mexico.

In 2011, we completed two acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of $41.9 million. These acquisitions included Stainless Pipe and Fittings Australia Pty. Ltd. (“MRC SPF”MSD”), a distributor and regional service provider of stainless steel piping products,valve and certain assetsvalve automation solutions to customers in Singapore, and operationsMetron Holding AS, the parent company of Valve Systems and ControlsHypteck AS (“VSC”Hypteck”), a Houston, Texas based company specializing in valve automation.Norwegian provider of instrumentation and process control products to the offshore, marine and onshore industries with a focus on the Norwegian Continental Shelf.

F-13


The impact of these transactions was not material to our financial statements in each of these respective years. Accordingly, pro forma information has not been presented.

NOTE 3—ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The rollforward of our allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

December 31,

2013

 

2012

 

2011

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

$             5,270

 

$             4,815

 

$             4,451

$                   3

 

$                   4

 

$                   3

Net Charge-offs

(2,435)

 

(1,973)

 

(69)

Net charge-offs

(4)

 

(3)

 

(1)

Provision

(298)

 

2,428 

 

433 

 

 

Ending balance

$             2,537

 

$             5,270

 

$             4,815

$                   3

 

$                   3

 

$                   4

Our accounts receivable is also presented net of sales returns and allowances. Those allowances approximated $3.1$1 million and $3.3 $2million at December 31, 20132016 and 2012, respectively.  2015.



F-14


NOTE 4—INVENTORIES

The composition of our inventory is as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

December 31,

2013

 

2012

2016

 

2015

Finished goods inventory at average cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy carbon steel tubular products

$         362,449

 

$        387,609

$               124

 

$              253

Valves, fittings, flanges and all other products

763,119 

 

752,630 

Valves, valve actuation and instrumentation

225 

 

273 

All other products

313 

 

374 

1,125,568 

 

1,140,239 
662 

 

900 

Less: Excess of average cost over LIFO cost (LIFO reserve)

(130,802)

 

(150,982)
(67)

 

(89)

Less: Other inventory reserves

(23,199)

 

(19,029)
(34)

 

(30)

$         971,567

 

$        970,228

$               561

 

$              781

During 2012, ourOur inventory quantities were reduced during 2016, resulting in a liquidation of a LIFOlast-in, first out (“LIFO”) inventory layer that was carried at a lower cost prevailing from a prior year, as compared with current costs in the current year (a “LIFO decrement”). A LIFO decrement results in the erosion of layers created in earlier years, and, therefore, a LIFO layer is not created for years that have decrements. In 2012,For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the effect of this LIFO decrement decreased cost of sales by approximately $1.3 million.$14 million and increased cost of sales by $8 million, respectively. There was no LIFO decrement in 2013.  2014.

In the third quarter of 2016, we incurred inventory-related charges totaling $45 million.  These charges reflect adjustments necessary to reduce the carrying value of certain products determined to be excess or obsolete to their estimated net realizable value based on our current market outlook for those products.  This amount included $24 million in the International segment primarily related to a restructuring of our Australian business and market conditions in Iraq.  In addition, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory were increased in the U.S. and Canada by $16 million and $5 million, respectively.

NOTE 5—PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

Depreciable Life

 

2013

 

2012

Depreciable Life

 

2016

 

2015

Land and improvements

-

 

$       16,930

 

$     17,465

-

 

$             15

 

$           15

Building and building improvements

40 years

 

63,494 

 

58,090 

40 years

 

63 

 

63 

Machinery and equipment

3 to 10 years

 

137,254 

 

130,289 

3 to 10 years

 

140 

 

148 

Property held under capital leases

20 to 30 years

 

4,438 

 

3,500 

Enterprise resource planning software

10 years

 

32 

 

 -

Software in progress

-

 

14 

 

24 

 

 

222,116 

 

209,344 

 

 

264 

 

250 

Allowances for depreciation and amortization

 

 

(103,193)

 

(86,886)

 

 

(129)

 

(123)

 

 

$     118,923

 

$   122,458

 

 

$           135

 

$         127







F-14F-15

 


 

 

NOTE 6—GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 are as follows (in thousands)millions):

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US

 

Canada

 

International

 

Total

Goodwill at December 31, 2010 (1)

 

$            509,478

 

$                        -

 

$               39,906

 

$            549,384

Acquisition of VSC

 

2,780 

 

 -

 

 -

 

2,780 

Acquisition of MRC SPF

 

 -

 

 -

 

11,565 

 

11,565 

Other

 

(211)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(211)

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 -

 

 -

 

(2,248)

 

(2,248)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill at December 31, 2011 (1)

 

$            512,047

 

$                        -

 

$               49,223

 

$            561,270

Acquisition of MRC PSA

 

 -

 

 -

 

21,829 

 

21,829 

Acquisition of PSS

 

25,051 

 

 -

 

 -

 

25,051 

Adjustment of MRC SPF purchase price

 

 -

 

 -

 

1,197 

 

1,197 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 -

 

 -

 

1,045 

 

1,045 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill at December 31, 2012 (1)

 

$            537,098

 

$                        -

 

$               73,294

 

$            610,392

Acquisition of Flow Control

 

15,257 

 

 -

 

 -

 

15,257 

Acquisition of Flangefitt

 

 -

 

 -

 

9,472 

 

9,472 

Adjustment of PSS purchase price

 

(378)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(378)

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 -

 

 -

 

(2,459)

 

(2,459)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill at December 31, 2013 (1)

 

$            551,977

 

$                        -

 

$               80,307

 

$            632,284



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

US

 

Canada

 

International

 

Total



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill at December 31, 2013 (1)

 

$                  552

 

$                      -

 

$                    80

 

$              ��   632

Acquisition of Stream

 

 -

 

 -

 

155 

 

155 

Adjustment of Flangefitt purchase price

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

Buyout of joint venture

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

Acquisition of MSD

 

 -

 

 -

 

25 

 

25 

Acquisition of Hypteck

 

 -

 

 -

 

36 

 

36 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 -

 

 -

 

(46)

 

(46)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill at December 31, 2014

 

$                  552

 

$                      -

 

$                  254

 

$                  806

Goodwill impairment

 

(109)

 

 -

 

(183)

 

(292)

Other

 

(2)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(2)

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 -

 

 -

 

(28)

 

(28)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill at December 31, 2015

 

$                  441

 

$                      -

 

$                    43

 

$                  484

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 -

 

 -

 

(2)

 

(2)

Goodwill at December 31, 2016

 

$                  441

 

$                      -

 

$                    41

 

$                  482



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)Net of accumulated impairment losses of $240.9 million and $69.0 million in the U.S and Canadian segments, respectively.

(1)

Net of prior years’ accumulated impairment losses of $241 million and $69 million U.S. and Canadian segments, respectively.

Other intangible assets by major classification consist of the following (in thousands)millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Amortization

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Net Book



 

Period (in years)

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Value



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer base (1)

 

16.4

 

$                  669

 

$                 (390)

 

$                  279

Amortizable trade names

 

N/A

 

12 

 

(12)

 

 -

Indefinite lived trade names (2)

 

N/A

 

132 

 

 -

 

132 



 

 

 

$                  813

 

$                 (402)

 

$                  411



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer base (1)

 

16.2

 

$                  724

 

$                 (400)

 

324 

Amortizable trade names

 

6.8

 

15 

 

(12)

 

Indefinite lived trade names (2)

 

N/A

 

132 

 

 -

 

132 

Noncompete agreements

 

3.0

 

 

(1)

 

 -



 

 

 

$                  872

 

$                 (413)

 

$                  459

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Net Book

 

 

Period (in years)

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Value

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer base

 

15.8

 

$            730,108

 

$            (291,116)

 

$            438,992

Amortizable trade names

 

6.1

 

18,099 

 

(9,268)

 

8,831 

Indefinite lived trade names (1)

 

N/A

 

260,023 

 

 -

 

260,023 

Noncompete agreements

 

3.0

 

244 

 

(81)

 

163 

 

 

15.5

 

$         1,008,474

 

$            (300,465)

 

$            708,009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer base

 

15.8

 

$            721,010

 

$            (242,355)

 

$            478,655

Amortizable trade names

 

6.7

 

15,671 

 

(6,577)

 

9,094 

Indefinite lived trade names (1)

 

N/A

 

260,023 

 

 -

 

260,023 

Noncompete agreements

 

3.8

 

2,470 

 

(970)

 

1,500 

 

 

15.6

 

$            999,174

 

$            (249,902)

 

$            749,272

(1)

Net of accumulated impairment losses of $42 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.  

(2)

Net of accumulated impairment losses of $204 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

(1)NetIn connection with our annual goodwill impairment test as of accumulated impairment lossesOctober 1, 2015, we tested goodwill for our U.S. and International reporting units.  Our Canadian reporting unit had no goodwill.  No goodwill impairments were indicated at that time.  However, with the continued decline in commodity prices and activity levels subsequent to our annual test, we performed an assessment of $76.2 million. 

current market conditions and our future long-term expectations of oil and gas markets as of December 31, 2015 and concluded it was more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units were lower than their carrying values.  Our assessment took into

F-15F-16

 


 

 

consideration, among other things, significant further reductions in projected spending by our customers in 2016 and a more pessimistic long-term outlook for the price of oil and natural gas, and the resulting impact on our 2016 budget and long-term financial forecast.   As a result of this assessment, we completed an interim impairment test as of December 31, 2015.  This test resulted in an impairment charge of $292 million comprised of $109 million in our U.S. reporting unit and $183 million in our International reporting unit.  No impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2014. In these years, the estimated fair value of each of our reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying values.

As a result of the same factors that necessitated an interim impairment test for goodwill, we completed an interim impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2015.  This test resulted in an impairment charge of $128 million associated with our trade name.  No impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2014.  In these years, the estimated fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets substantially exceeded their carrying value.

As of December 31, 2015, the reduction in our long-term financial forecast was also an indication that our amortizable intangible assets may be impaired.  We performed impairment tests as of that date and determined that certain of our customer base intangible assets within our International segment were impaired.  An impairment charge of $42 million was recognized in December 2015 to reduce the carrying value of these assets to their fair value.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

Total amortization of intangible assets for each of the years ending December 31, 20142017 to 20182021 is currently estimated as follows (in thousands)millions):

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$              53,830

 

 

 

2015

 

53,207 

 

 

 

2016

 

51,671 

 

 

 

2017

 

50,023 

 

 

 

2018

 

49,092 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

$      46

 

 

 

2018

 

46 

 

 

 

2019

 

43 

 

 

 

2020

 

27 

 

 

 

2021

 

25 

 

 

 





NOTE 7—LONG-TERM DEBT

The significant components of our long-term debt are as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

Senior Secured Term Loan B, net of discount of $4,457 and $6,345

$          787,059

 

$           642,030

Global ABL Facility

199,630 

 

608,006 

Other

145 

 

6,553 

 

986,834 

 

1,256,589 

Less current portion

7,935 

 

6,500 

 

$          978,899

 

$        1,250,089



 

 

 



December 31,



2016

 

2015



 

 

 

Senior Secured Term Loan B, net of discount and issuance costs of $4 and $7, respectively

$                414

 

$                 519

Global ABL Facility

 -

 

 -



414 

 

519 

Less: current portion

 



$                406

 

$                 511

Senior Secured Term Loan B:B:  In November 2012, we entered into a $650 million seven-year Term Loan B (the “Term Loan”), with Bank of America N.A. as administrative agent, and several other lenders from time to time parties thereto.lenders. In November 2013, we increased the principal amount of the term loanTerm Loan to $793.5$794 million and modified the interest rates to those outlined below.  In November 2016, we repaid $100 million of the balance outstanding under the Term Loan.  In June 2015, we repaid $250 million of the balance outstanding under the Term Loan with proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock.  As a result of these repayments, we incurred charges of $1 million and $3 million for the write off of debt issuance costs for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Accordion. The Term Loan allows for incremental increases up to an aggregate of $200 million, plus an additional amount such that the Company’s senior secured leverage ratio (the ratio of the Company’s Consolidated EBITDA (as defined under the Term Loan) to senior secured debt) (net of up to $75 million of unrestricted cash) would not exceed 3.50 to 1.00.

Maturity. The scheduled maturity date of the Term Loan is November 9, 2019. The Term Loan will amortize in equal quarterly installments at 1% a year with the payment of the balance at maturity.

Guarantees. The Company and all of the U.S. borrower’s current and future wholly owned material U.S. subsidiaries guaranteed the

F-17


Term Loan subject to certain exceptions.

Security. The Term Loan is secured by a first lien on all of the Company’s assets and the assets of its domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions and other than the collateral securing the Global ABL Facility (which includes accounts receivable, inventory and related assets, collectively, the “ABL collateral”), and by a second lien on the ABL collateral. In addition, a pledge secures the Term Loan of all the capital stock of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of its first tier foreign subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions.

Interest Rates and Fees. The Company has the option to pay interest at a base rate, subject to a floor of 2.00%, plus an applicable margin, or at a rate based on LIBOR, subject to a floor of 1.00%, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate loans is 300 basis points, and the applicable margin for LIBOR loans is 400 basis points. The margin steps down by 25 basis points if the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio (as defined under the Term Loan) is less than 2.50 to 1.00.

Voluntary Prepayment. The Company is able to voluntarily prepay the principal without penalty or premium, other than a 1% premium for re-pricing transactions that occur prior to May 19, 2014.

Mandatory Prepayment. The Company is required to repay the Term Loan with certain asset sale and insurance proceeds, certain debt proceeds and 50% of excess cash flow (reducing to 25% if the Company’s senior secured leverage ratio is no more than 2.75 to 1.00 and 0% if the Company’s senior secured leverage ratio is no more than 2.50 to 1.00).  The Company is not required to make a mandatory prepayment in 20142017 related to the fiscal year 2013.2016 because November 2016 payment noted above satisfied this requirement.

F-16


Restrictive Covenants. The Term Loan does not include any financial maintenance covenants.

The Term Loan contains restrictive covenants (in each case, subject to exclusions) that limit, among other things, the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries (including the Borrower) to:

make investments;

•  prepay certain indebtedness;

grant liens;

•  incur additional indebtedness;

sell assets;

•  make fundamental changes;

enter into transactions with affiliates; and

•  in the case of the Company, to pay dividends.

·

make investments;

·

prepay certain indebtedness;

·

grant liens;

·

incur additional indebtedness;

·

sell assets;

·

make fundamental changes;

·

enter into transactions with affiliates; and

·

pay dividends.

The Term Loan also contains other customary restrictive covenants. The covenants are subject to various baskets and materiality thresholds, with certain of the baskets permitted by the restrictions on the repayment of subordinated indebtedness, restricted payments and investments being available only when the senior secured leverage ratio of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries is less than 3.25:1.00.

The Term Loan provides that the Company and its restricted subsidiaries may incur any first lien indebtedness that is pari passu to the Term Loan so long as the pro forma senior secured leverage ratio of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries is less than or equal to 3.50:1.00. The Company and its restricted subsidiaries may incur any second lien indebtedness so long as the pro forma junior secured leverage ratio of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries is less than or equal to 4.00:1.00. The Company and its restricted subsidiaries may incur any unsecured indebtedness so long as the total leverage ratio of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries is less than or equal to 5.00:1.00. Additionally, under the Term Loan, the Company and its restricted subsidiaries may incur indebtedness under the Global ABL Facility (or any replacement facility) in an amount not to exceed the greater of $1.3 billion and a borrowing base (equal to, subject to certain exceptions, 85% of all accounts receivable and 65% of the book value of all inventory owned by the Company and its restricted subsidiaries).

The Term Loan contains certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants and events of default, including, among other things, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy, certain events under ERISA, judgment defaults, actual or asserted failure of any material guaranty or security documents supporting the Term Loan to be in full force and effect and change of control. If such an event of default occurs, the Agent under the Term Loan is entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the Term Loan and all other actions that a secured creditor is permitted to take following a default.

Global ABL Credit Facility:Facility:  In March 2012, we entered into a multi-currency global asset-based revolving credit facility (the “Global ABL Facility”) which replaced our then existing asset-based lending credit facility, our MRC Transmark term loanthat was subsequently amended and revolving credit facility and our MRC Transmark overdraft facility.restated in July 2014. The five-year Global ABL Facility, which will mature on July 18, 2019, is comprised of $1.25$1.05 billion of total revolving credit facilities, including  $977 million facility in the United States, $170$30 million facility in Norway, $20 million facility in Canada, $12$5 million facility in the United Kingdom, $75$10 million

F-18


facility in Australia, $9$4 million facility in the Netherlands and $7$4 million facility in Belgium. The facility contains an accordion feature that allows us to increase the total principal amount of the facilityfacilities by up to $300 million.

Each of our current and future wholly owned material U.S. subsidiaries and MRC Global Inc. guarantees the obligations of our borrower subsidiaries under the Global ABL Facility. Additionally, each of our non-U.S. borrower subsidiaries guarantees the obligations of our other non-U.S. borrower subsidiaries under the Global ABL Facility.

Obligations under the U.S. tranche are primarily secured, subject to certain exceptions, by a first-priority security interest in the accounts receivable, inventory and related assets of our wholly owned, material U.S. subsidiaries. The obligations of any of our non-U.S. borrower subsidiaries are primarily secured, subject to certain exceptions, by a first-priority security interest in the accounts receivable, inventory and related assets of the non-U.S. subsidiary and our wholly owned material U.S. subsidiaries.

No non-U.S. subsidiary guarantees the U.S. tranche and no property of our non-U.S. subsidiaries secures the U.S. tranche. The security interest in accounts receivable, inventory and related assets of the U.S. borrower subsidiaries ranks prior to the security interest in this collateral which secures the Term Loan.

Each of our non-U.S. borrower subsidiaries has a separate standalone borrowing base that limits the non-U.S. subsidiary’s ability to borrow under its respective tranche, provided that the non-U.S. subsidiaries may utilize excess availability under the U.S. tranche to borrow amounts in excess of their respective borrowing bases (but not to exceed the applicable commitment amount for the foreign

F-17


subsidiary’s jurisdiction), which utilization will reduce availability under the U.S. tranche dollar for dollar.

Subject to the foregoing, our ability to borrow in each jurisdiction, other than Belgium, under the Global ABL Facility is limited by a borrowing base in that jurisdiction equal to 85% of eligible receivables, plus the lesser of 70% of eligible inventory and 85% of appraised net orderly liquidation value of the inventory. In Belgium, our borrowing is limited by a borrowing base determined under Belgian law.

U.S. borrowings under the facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin varying between 1.50%1.25% and 2.00%1.75% based on our fixed charge coverage ratio. Canadian borrowings under the facility bear interest at the Canadian Dollar Bankers’ Acceptances Rate (“BA Rate”) plus a margin varying between 1.25% and 1.75% based on our fixed charge coverage ratio.  Borrowings by our foreign borrower subsidiaries are generally subject to the samebear interest rate margins with theat a benchmark rate, for such borrowings varyingwhich varies based on the currency in which such borrowings are made.made, plus a margin varying between 1.50% and 2.00% based on our fixed charge coverage ratio.  

Senior Secured Notes:In a series of transactions from June to September 2012, we purchased in the open market $188.7 million in principal of our 9.50% senior secured notes due 2016 for $205.0 million.  We incurred a pre-tax loss on the purchase of the senior secured notes of $21.7 million related to the purchase premium, the write off of unamortized deferred financing costs and the write off of original discount. 

In November 2012, we redeemed the remaining $861.3 million of senior secured notes.  The early redemption required the payment of a premium of $68.9 million.  When combined with the write off of unamortized deferred financing costs and write off of original issue discount, this redemption resulted in a pre-tax loss of $92.2 million.

Excess Availability: At December 31, 2013,2016, availability under our revolving credit facilities was $776.9$425 million.

Debt Issuance Costs:  In the first quarter of 2016, we adopted ASU No. 2015-03 Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 855-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.  This ASU requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability consistent with debt discounts.  As a result of the adoption, we have reclassified debt issuance costs associated with our Term Loan of $5 million as of December31,2015, from other assets to long term debt in our balance sheet.  Accordingly, long term debt originally reported as $524 million at December 31, 2015 has been revised to $519 million.  Debt issuance costs associated with our Global ABL Facility will continue to be presented in other assets.  These amounts were $6 million and $8 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Interest on Borrowings:  The interest rates on our borrowings outstanding at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, including the amortization of original issue discount, on the Term Loan, were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

December 31,

2013

 

2012

2016

 

2015

Senior Secured Term Loan B, net of discount

5.09% 

 

6.39% 

Senior Secured Term Loan B

5.51% 

 

4.98% 

Global ABL Facility

2.12% 

 

2.21% 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 

There was no outstanding balance on the Global ABL Facility at December 31, 2016 or 2015.

F-19


Maturities of Long-Term Debt: At December 31, 2013,2016, annual maturities of long-term debt during the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands)millions):

 



 

 

2014 

$             7,935

2015 
8,080 
2016 
7,935 
2017 
207,565 
2018 
7,935 

Thereafter

747,384 



 

 

 

2017

$      8

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

398 

 

 

2020

 -

 

 

2021

 -

 

 



 

 

 





NOTE 8—DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We use derivative financial instruments to help manage our exposure to interest rate risk and fluctuations in foreign currencies. All of our derivative instruments are freestanding and, accordingly, changes in their fair market value are recorded in earnings. In December 2013, we entered into foreign exchange forward contracts with a notional amount of $1.6 billion Norwegian Krone  ($260 million) related to the January 2014 acquisition of Stream AS.

F-18


The table below provides data about the fair value of the derivative instruments that are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):was $0 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015.  The total notional amount of forward foreign exchange contracts was approximately $36 million and $41 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts (1)

$        4,603

 

$              -

 

$             3

 

$              -

(1)

Included in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” or “other current assets” in our consolidated balance sheets. The total notional amount of our forward foreign exchange contracts was approximately $331 million and $69 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  



The table below provides data about the amount of gains and (losses) recognized in our consolidated statements of operations related to our derivative instruments (in thousands)millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

2013

 

2012

 

2011

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Foreign exchange forward contracts

$        4,731

 

$          176

 

$            71

$              1

 

$            (1)

 

$            (1)

Interest rate contracts

$               -

 

$       2,010

 

$       6,973







NOTE 9—INCOME TAXES

The components of our (loss) income before income taxes were (in thousands)millions):





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2013

 

2012

 

2011

2016

 

2015

 

2014

United States

$          231,434

 

$          156,226

 

$            50,654

$                  (7)

 

$                (79)

 

$               223

Foreign

5,477 

 

25,470 

 

5,114 
(84)

 

(263)

 

$          236,911

 

$          181,696

 

$            55,768

$                (91)

 

$              (342)

 

$               226

Income taxes included in the consolidated statements of incomeoperations consist of (in thousands)millions):

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2016

 

2015

 

2014

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$           90,063

 

$           65,563

 

$           32,080

$                 13

 

$                 64

 

$                 95

State

8,058 

 

6,569 

 

2,878 

 

 

Foreign

6,518 

 

12,038 

 

8,188 

 

 

13 

104,639 

 

84,170 

 

43,146 
15 

 

76 

 

116 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

(21,102)

 

(15,776)

 

(14,960)
(21)

 

(70)

 

(24)

State

2,818 

 

(1,256)

 

(1,177)
(2)

 

(6)

 

(2)

Foreign

(1,539)

 

(3,400)

 

(225)

 -

 

(11)

 

(8)

(19,823)

 

(20,432)

 

(16,362)
(23)

 

(87)

 

(34)

Income tax expense

$           84,816

 

$           63,738

 

$           26,784

Income tax (benefit) expense

$                  (8)

 

$                (11)

 

$                 82

F-19F-20

 


 

 

Our effective tax rate varied from the statutory federal income tax rate for the following reasons (in thousands)millions):

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Federal tax expense at statutory rates

$           82,918

 

$           63,474

 

$           19,518

State taxes

3,855 

 

3,453 

 

977 

Nondeductible expenses

1,152 

 

1,123 

 

1,121 

Effect of tax rate changes on existing temporary differences

3,074 

 

 -

 

3,993 

Effect of foreign operations

(9,752)

 

(3,565)

 

(499)

Change in valuation allowance

7,714 

 

(78)

 

522 

Other

(4,145)

 

(669)

 

1,152 

Income tax expense

$           84,816

 

$           63,738

 

$           26,784

Effective tax rate

35.8% 

 

35.1% 

 

48.0% 



 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended December 31,



2016

 

2015

 

2014

Federal tax (benefit) expense at statutory rates

$                (32)

 

$              (120)

 

$                 79

State taxes

 

(1)

 

Nondeductible expenses

 

 

Foreign operations taxed at different rates

 

(5)

 

(5)

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment

 -

 

99 

 

 -

Change in valuation allowance related to foreign losses

16 

 

15 

 

Income tax (benefit) expense

$                  (8)

 

$                (11)

 

$                 82

Effective tax rate

9% 

 

3% 

 

36% 

Significant components of our current deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands)millions):





 

 

 



December 31,



2016

 

2015



 

 

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$                   1

 

$                   1

Accruals and reserves

27 

 

28 

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

44 

 

30 

Other

 

Subtotal

74 

 

62 

Valuation allowance

(50)

 

(34)

Total

24 

 

28 



 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

Inventory valuation

(47)

 

(68)

Property, plant and equipment

(19)

 

(10)

Intangible assets

(138)

 

(153)

Other

(3)

 

(4)

Total

(207)

 

(235)

Net deferred tax liability

$              (183)

 

$              (207)



 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$             1,265

 

$             2,046

Accruals and reserves

16,603 

 

12,617 

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

13,423 

 

5,453 

Other

1,270 

 

1,504 

Subtotal

32,561 

 

21,620 

Valuation allowance

(14,155)

 

(2,059)

Total

18,406 

 

19,561 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 -

 

(4,550)

Inventory valuation

(81,208)

 

(79,575)

Property, plant and equipment

(8,538)

 

(11,210)

Intangible assets

(236,832)

 

(252,976)

Debt

(5,798)

 

(5,745)

Other

(177)

 

(11)

Total

(332,553)

 

(354,067)

Net deferred tax liability

$        (314,147)

 

$        (334,506)

We record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions. If we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

In the United States, we had approximately $101.6$25 million of state net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 2013,2016, which will expire in future years through 2033 and foreign tax credit carryforwards of $4.4$4 million expiring in 2022. In certain non-U.S. jurisdictions, we had $34.6$121 million of net operating loss carryforwards, of which $30.6$108 million have no expiration and $4.0$13 million will expire in future years through 2022.2026.  We believe that it is more likely than not that the benefit from non-U.S. jurisdiction NOL carryforwards will not be realized.  As such, we have recorded full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets related to these non-U.S. jurisdiction NOL carryforwards. 

We consider the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested, as we have no current intention to repatriate these earnings. As such, deferred income taxes are not provided for temporary differences ofon approximately $192.9$201 million and $189.4$209 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012, respectively, representing earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested.2015, respectively. These additional foreign earnings could become subject to additional tax if remitted, or deemed remitted, as a

F-20


dividend. Computation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and any other basis difference is not practicable.

F-21


Our tax filings for various periods are subject to audit by the tax authorities in most jurisdictions where we conduct business. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examination for all years through 20092012 and the statute of limitations at our international locations is generally six toor seven years. 

At December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, our unrecognized tax benefits were immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 10—REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK  

Preferred Stock Issuance

In June 2015, we issued 363,000 shares of Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) and received gross proceeds of $363 million. The Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights on liquidation, winding-up and dissolution. The Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share, and holders of Preferred Stock are entitled to cumulative dividends payable quarterly in cash at a rate of 6.50% per annum.  In the event we fail to declare and pay the quarterly dividend for an amount equal to six or more dividend periods, the holders of the Preferred Stock would be entitled to designate two members to our Board of Directors.  They are also permitted to designate one member to our Board of Directors after a period of three years.  Holders of Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with the holders of the common stock as a single class, in each case, on an as-converted basis, except where a separate class vote of the common stockholders is required by law. Holders of Preferred Stock have certain limited special approval rights, including with respect to the issuance of pari passu or senior equity securities of the Company.

The Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holders into shares of common stock at an initial conversion rate of 55.9284 shares of common stock for each share of Preferred Stock, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $17.88 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment. On or after the fifth anniversary of the initial issuance of the Preferred Stock, the Company will have the option to redeem, in whole but not in part, all the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, subject to certain redemption price adjustments on the basis of the date of the conversion. We may elect to convert the Preferred Stock, in whole but not in part, into the relevant number of shares of common stock on or after the 54th month after the initial issuance of the Preferred Stock if the last reported sale price of the common stock has been at least 150% of the conversion price then in effect for a specified period. The conversion rate is subject to customary anti-dilution and other adjustments.

Holders of the Preferred Stock may, at their option, require the Company to repurchase their shares in the event of a fundamental change, as defined in the shareholder agreement and related documents.  The repurchase price is based on the original $1,000 per share purchase price except in the case of a liquidation in which case they would receive the greater of $1,000 per share and the amount that would be received if they held common stock converted at the conversion rate in effect at the time of the fundamental change.  Because this feature could require redemption as a result of the occurrence of an event not solely within the control of the Company, the Preferred Stock is classified as temporary equity on our balance sheet.

NOTE 11—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

We have authorized 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock.  Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue shares and set the terms of the shares of preferred stock.  As of December 31, 20132016 and 2012, there were no2015, the 363,000 shares of preferred stock described in Note 10 were issued and outstanding. 

Share Repurchase Program

In November 2015, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program for common stock up to $100 million, which was increased to $125 million in November 2016.  The program is scheduled to expire December 31, 2017.  The shares may be repurchased at management’s discretion in the open market.  Depending on market conditions and other factors, these repurchases may be commenced or outstanding.suspended from time to time without prior notice.



 

 

 

Summary of share repurchase activity under the repurchase program:

 

 

 



2016

 

2015

Number of shares acquired on the open market

6,861,191 

 

816,389 

Average price per share

$                13.96

 

$                14.12

Total cost of acquired shares (in millions)

$                     95

 

$                     12

F-22


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Accumulated other comprehensive loss net of tax, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

December 31,

2013

 

2012

2016

 

2015

Currency translation adjustments

$             (40,173)

 

$             (21,829)

$                  (233)

 

$                  (231)

Pension related adjustments

(249)

 

(335)
(1)

 

(1)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

$             (40,422)

 

$             (22,164)

$                  (234)

 

$                  (232)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per Share

Earnings per share are calculated in the table below (in thousands,millions, except per share amounts).





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2013

 

2012

 

2011

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net income

$             152,095

 

$             117,958

 

$              28,984

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders

$                  (107)

 

$                  (344)

 

$                  144

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average basic shares outstanding

101,712 

 

96,465 

 

84,417 
97.3 

 

102.1 

 

102.0 

Effect of dilutive securities

810 

 

460 

 

238 

 -

 

 -

 

0.8 

Average diluted shares outstanding

102,522 

 

96,925 

 

84,655 
97.3 

 

102.1 

 

102.8 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$                   1.50

 

$                   1.22

 

$                  0.34

$                 (1.10)

 

$                 (3.38)

 

$                 1.41

Diluted

$                   1.48

 

$                   1.22

 

$                  0.34

$                 (1.10)

 

$                 (3.38)

 

$                 1.40

Stock optionsEquity awards and shares of restricted stockPreferred  Stock are disregarded in this calculation if they are determined to be anti-dilutive. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, our anti-dilutive stock options approximated 0.53.6 million, 2.1 3.8million and 2.3 1.0million, respectively.

NOTE 11—12—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Equity Compensation Plans:  Our 2007 Stock Option Plan (prior to its replacement) permitted the grant of stock options to our employees, directors and consultants for up to 3,750,000 shares of common stock. The options were not to be granted with an exercise price less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant, nor for a term exceeding ten years. Vesting generally occurred over a five year period on the anniversaries of the date specified in the employees’ respective option agreements, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances set forth in the option agreements.  During 2013, 262,5862016,  87,286 stock options were exercised, and no stock options were granted under this plan.

Under the terms of our 2007 Restricted Stock Plan, up to 500,000 shares of restricted stock could have been granted (prior to its replacement) at the direction of the Board of Directors and vesting generally occurred in one-fourth increments on the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date specified in the employees’ respective restricted stock agreements, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances set forth in the restricted stock agreements. Fair value was based on the fair market value of our stock on the date of issuance. We

F-21


expense the fair value of the restricted stock grants on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

Under the terms of the 2007 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans, all previously granted stock options and restricted stock were to vest when funds affiliated with Goldman, Sachs & Co. ceased to own more than 5,141,547 shares of our common stock. Upon completion of the November 2013 sale of our common stock by Goldman, Sachs & Co.,  852,939 stock options and 134,211 shares of restricted stock vested triggering the accelerated recognition of $5.2 million of equity-based compensation expense.

In April 2012, we replaced the 2007 Stock Option Plan and the 2007 Restricted Stock Plan with the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. No additional shares or other equity interests will be awarded under the prior plans. The 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan hasoriginally had 3,250,000 shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the plan. In April 2015, our shareholders approved an additional 4,250,000 shares for reservation for issuance under the plan.  The plan permits the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based and cash-based awards. Since the adoption of the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors has periodically granted stock options, and restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance share units to directors and employees, but no other types of awards have been granted under the plan. Options and stock appreciation rights may not be granted at prices less than their fair market value on the date of the grant, nor for a term exceeding ten years. For employees, vesting generally occurs over a four orthree to five year period on the anniversaries of the date specified in the employees’ respective agreements, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances set forth in the option agreements. Vesting for directors generally occurs in one year.on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.  In 2013, 726,746 stock options and 99,1632016,  103,701 shares of restricted stock,  344,922 performance share units and 1,152,614 restricted units were granted to executive management, members of our Board of Directors and employees under this plan. There were no stock options granted to management during 2016. To date, 1,890,670

F-23


5,088,309 shares have been granted under this plan.  We expense the fair value of the stock option grants on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. A Black-Scholes option-pricingoption pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of the stock options. A Monte Carlo simulation is completed to estimate the fair value of performance share unit awards with a stock price performance component.  We expense the fair value of all equity grants, including performance share unit awards, on a straight line basis over the vesting period. 

Stock Options

The following tables summarize award activity for stock options:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 



 

 

 

Weighted

 

Average

 

 



 

 

 

Average

 

Remaining

 

Aggregate



 

 

 

Exercise

 

Contractual

 

Intrinsic



 

Options

 

Price

 

Term

 

Value



 

 

 

 

 

(years)

 

(millions)

Stock Options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

4,005,143 

 

$              21.45

 

5.3 

 

$                     1

Exercised

 

(87,286)

 

9.78 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

(6,294)

 

25.10 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

(127,059)

 

21.39 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

3,784,504 

 

$              21.71

 

4.5 

 

$                     4



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding, vested and exercisable

 

2,729,945 

 

$              21.24

 

4.0 

 

$                     4

Options outstanding, vested and expected to vest

 

3,771,652 

 

$              21.71

 

4.5 

 

$                     4







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Remaining

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

Contractual

 

Intrinsic

 

 

Options

 

Price

 

Term

 

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

(years)

 

(thousands)

Stock Options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

3,758,758 

 

$              18.05

 

7.4 

 

$            36,585

Granted

 

726,746 

 

29.53 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(262,586)

 

12.50 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

(286,257)

 

22.62 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

(2,576)

 

12.52 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

3,934,085 

 

$              20.47

 

7.0 

 

$            46,144

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding, vested and exercisable

 

2,397,955 

 

$              17.75

 

5.8 

 

$            34,772

Options outstanding, vested and expected to vest

 

3,883,434 

 

$              20.40

 

6.9 

 

$            45,798



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

December 31,



 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Stock Options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average, grant-date fair value of awards granted

 

 

 

$                    -

 

$                    -

 

$             11.86

Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised

 

 

 

457,834 

 

72,495 

 

1,518,066 

Total fair value of stock options vested

 

 

 

3,351,797 

 

3,494,879 

 

2,759,196 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

Grant-Date

 

 

Shares

 

Fair Value

Restricted Stock

 

 

 

 

Nonvested at December 31, 2012

 

134,211 

 

$              15.65

Granted

 

99,163 

 

29.52 

Vested

 

(135,179)

 

15.76 

Forfeited

 

(4,712)

 

29.87 

Nonvested at December 31, 2013

 

93,483 

 

$              29.48

F-22


The following table summarizes award activity under our stock option and restricted stock plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Stock Options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average, grant-date fair value of awards granted

 

 

 

$              12.10

 

$                6.52

 

$                3.46

Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised

 

 

 

4,717,693 

 

1,089,830 

 

1,715 

Total fair value of stock options vested

 

 

 

6,352,967 

 

1,370,130 

 

1,833,836 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Restricted Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average, grant-date fair value of awards granted

 

 

 

$              29.48

 

$              15.65

 

$              14.36

Total fair value of restricted stock vested

 

 

 

4,173,834 

 

484,141 

 

378,670 

Stock Options

Following are the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair values of our stock options:

options granted during the period:  



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

 

0.86% 

 

0.90% 

 

1.32% 

Dividend yield (1)

 

 

 

0.00% 

 

0.00% 

 

0.00% 

Expected volatility

 

 

 

40.96% 

 

41.87% 

 

46.05% 

Expected life (in years)

 

 

 

6.2 

 

6.6 

 

5.0 

Year Ended December 31,

2016 (1)

2015 (1)

2014

Risk-free interest rate

 -

 -

1.74% 

Dividend yield (2)

 -

 -

0.00% 

Expected volatility

 -

 -

39.83% 

Expected life (in years)

 -

 -

6.0 

 

(1)

No stock options were granted during this period.

(2)

The expected dividend yield reflects the restriction on our ability to pay dividends and does not anticipate “special” dividends.



F-24


Restricted Stock

The following tables summarizes award activity for restricted stock:



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Weighted



 

 

 

Average



 

 

 

Grant-Date



 

Shares

 

Fair Value

Restricted Stock

 

 

 

 

Nonvested at December 31, 2015

 

795,493 

 

$              16.38

Granted

 

103,701 

 

13.24 

Vested

 

(326,260)

 

16.08 

Forfeited

 

(19,446)

 

15.34 

Nonvested at December 31, 2016

 

553,488 

 

$              16.01



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

December 31,



 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Restricted Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average, grant-date fair value of awards granted

 

 

 

$              16.01

 

$              16.38

 

$              29.13

Total fair value of restricted stock vested

 

 

 

3,692,961 

 

1,279,628 

 

939,349 

Restricted Stock Unit Awards

The following table summarizes award activity for restricted unit awards:



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Weighted



 

 

 

Average



 

 

 

Grant-Date



 

Shares

 

Fair Value

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

 

 

Nonvested at December 31, 2015

 

79,607 

 

$              13.44

Granted

 

1,152,614 

 

9.56 

Vested

 

(27,704)

 

13.35 

Forfeited

 

(40,685)

 

9.70 

Nonvested at December 31, 2016

 

1,163,832 

 

$                9.73



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

December 31,



 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average, grant-date fair value of awards granted

 

 

 

$               9.73

 

$             13.44

 

$                    -

Total fair value of restricted stock units vested

 

 

 

298,773 

 

8,258 

 

 -

F-25


Performance Share Unit Awards

Performance share units were granted to certain executive officers during 2016 and 2015 based on total shareholder performance as well as a return on net capital employed calculation (“RANCE”).  The performance unit awards will be earned only to the extent that MRC Global attains specified performance goals over a three-year period relating to MRC Global’s total shareholder return compared to companies within the Oil Service Index and specified RANCE goals set forth on the date in which the award was granted.  The number of shares awarded at the end of the three-year period could vary from zero, if performance goals are not met, to as much as 200% of target, if performance goals are exceeded.    

The following tables summarizes award activity for performance unit awards:



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Weighted



 

 

 

Average



 

 

 

Grant-Date



 

Shares

 

Fair Value

Performance Share Unit Awards

 

 

 

 

Nonvested at December 31, 2015

 

195,082 

 

$              11.98

Granted

 

344,922 

 

10.02 

Vested

 

 -

 

 -

Forfeited

 

 -

 

 -

Nonvested at December 31, 2016

 

540,004 

 

$              10.73



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

December 31,



 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Performance Share Unit Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average, grant-date fair value of awards granted

 

 

 

$              10.73

 

$              11.98

 

$                     -

Total fair value of performance share units vested

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Recognized compensation expense and related income tax benefits under our equity-based compensation plans are set forth in the table below (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Equity-based compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

 

 

$            13,329

 

$              7,533

 

$              6,707

 

 

 

$                    3

 

$                    3

 

$                    6

Restricted stock

 

 

 

2,159 

 

481 

 

412 

Restricted common units

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1)

Profit units

 

 

 

 -

 

461 

 

1,267 

Restricted stock awards

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted stock units

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

Performance share units

 

 

 

 

 

 -

Total equity-based compensation expense

 

 

 

$            15,488

 

$              8,475

 

$              8,385

 

 

 

$                  12

 

$                  10

 

$                    9

Income tax benefits related to equity-based compensation

 

 

 

$              5,743

 

$              3,114

 

$              3,081

 

 

 

$                    5

 

$                    4

 

$                    3

Unrecognized compensation expense under our equity-based compensation plans is set forth in the table below (in thousands)millions):

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

Average Vesting

 

December 31,

 

Average Vesting

 

December 31,

 

Period (in years)

 

2013

 

Period (in years)

 

2016

Unrecognized equity-based compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

2.9

 

$            10,168

 

0.3

 

$                    2

Restricted stock

 

3.5

 

1,950 

Restricted stock awards

 

1.1

 

Restricted stock units

 

2.2

 

Performance share units

 

2.0

 

Total unrecognized equity-based compensation expense

 

 

 

$            12,118

 

 

 

$                  14

Defined Contribution Employee Benefit Plans: We maintain defined contribution employee benefit plans in a number of countries

F-26


in which we operate including the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, France, Belgium, Norway, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. These plans generally allow employees the option to defer a percentage of their compensation in accordance with local tax laws. In

F-23


addition, we make contributions under these plans ranging from 1% to 10% of eligible compensation.

Our provisions for the expense

Expense under defined contribution plans were $10.5$9 million, $9.0$11 million and $6.5$13 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014,  respectively.

Defined Benefit Employee Benefit Plan:  We maintain a defined benefit pension plan for 13 current and former employees of our Belgian subsidiary.  The unfunded liability associated with this plan was $0.5 million and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

NOTE 12—13—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Europump Systems Inc.

Certain MRC Canada ULC employees, who are shareholders of the Company, served as executive officers of Europump Systems Inc. (“Europump”). Europump is engaged in the business of selling, servicing and renting industrial pumps. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, our purchases from Europump approximated $42.3 million, $39.3 million and $42.0 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had payables to Europump of approximately $0 and $4.9 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, our sales to Europump approximated $2.1 million, $1.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had receivables of approximately $0.8 million and $0.2 million from Europump, respectively. We also agreed to make certain profit sharing payments to the Europump shareholders in respect of certain oilfield supply and service stores located in Western Canada. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the expense we recognized for the aggregate profit participation for Europump was approximately $6.2 million, $7.9 million and $5.8 million, respectively.  

Leases

We lease land and buildings at various locations from Hansford Associates Limited Partnership (“Hansford Associates”), and Prideco LLC (“Prideco”), as well as certain employees. We lease equipment and vehicles from Prideco.. Certain of our directors participate in ownership of Hansford Associates and Prideco. Most of these leases are renewable for various periods through 20192021 and are renewable at our option. The renewal options are subject to escalation clauses. These leases contain clauses for payment of real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses of the properties.

Rent expense attributable to related parties was $2.0 million, $4.3 million and $5.5$2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

 Future minimum rental payments required under operating leases with related parties that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are $2.0 million, $1.4 million, $1.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.4$2 million for the years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018,  $1 million for 2019 and thereafter, respectively.$0 million thereafter.

Cypress Energy PartnersCustomers

OneCertain members of our Board of Directors are also on the board of directors is the chairman, chief executive officer and president of onecertain of our customers Cypress Energy Partners, LP.  During 2013,with which we receiveddo business in the ordinary course.  We recognized revenue of $0.4$7 million, $26 million and $46 million from Cypress Energy Partners, LP.  Each sale was made on an arm’s-length basis at market pricing.

The Goldman Sachs Funds

Up to and until November 13, 2013, certain affiliates of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., including GS Capital Partners V Fund, L.P., GS Capital Partners VI Fund, L.P. and related entities, or the Goldman Sachs Funds, were the majority owners of PVF Holdings, our largest stockholder.  In March 2013, Goldman Sachs & Co. was the co-lead bookrunner on our secondary offering.  In 2012, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (“GSCP”), an affiliate of the Goldman Sachs Funds, was a co-lead arranger and joint bookrunner under our Global ABL Facility and our Term Loan as well as the syndication agent under those facilities. In addition, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners L.L.C. is a participant in our Global ABL Credit Facility. Goldman, Sachs & Co. was the co-lead bookrunner on our initial public offering and our November 2012 secondary offering.

Payments made to affiliates of the Goldman Sachs Funds in connection with these transactions were $10.9 million, $13.2 million and $0.3 millioncustomers for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

Affiliates  There was $1 million of the Goldman Sachs Funds 

From time to time, we sell products to affiliates of the Goldman Sachs Funds. The total revenues fromaccounts receivable with these affiliates were $33.7 million, $23.1 million, and $12.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The total receivables due from these affiliates were $7.0 million and $5.0 millioncustomers outstanding as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012, respectively.

F-24


In 2012, we engaged an affiliate of the Goldman Sachs Funds to provide services for treasury, accounts receivables collection software and disaster recovery systems and paid them approximately $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.2015.

NOTE 13—14—SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHIC AND PRODUCT LINE INFORMATION

We operate as threeOur business segments,is comprised of four operating segments: U.S., Eastern Region and Gulf Coast, U.S. Western Region, Canada and International. Our International segment consists of our operations outside of the U.S. and Canada, principally Europe, Asia and Australasia.Canada. These segments represent our business of selling pipe, valves and fittingsPVF to the energy and industrial sectors,sector across each of the upstream (exploration, production and extraction of underground oil and gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and gas, gas utilities, and the storage and distribution of oil and gas) and downstream (crude oil refining, petrochemical and chemical processing and general industrials) markets.  Our two U.S. operating segments have been aggregated into a single reportable segment based on their economic similarities.  As a result, we report segment information for the U.S., Canada and International.

Prior to organizational changes that occurred in April 2016, our U.S. business consisted of a single operating segment.  As a result of the separation of U.S. segment into two distinct operating segments based on our new management structure, we completed an interim goodwill impairment test, as of April 1, 2016, and concluded that no indication of impairment existed as the fair values of each U.S. reporting unit significantly exceeded its carrying value.

F-27


The following table presents financial information for each segment (in millions):  







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$         3,967.6

 

$          4,238.4

 

$           3,849.2

 

$            2,297

 

$            3,572

 

$              4,427

Canada

 

709.4 

 

765.2 

 

653.6 

 

243 

 

333 

 

633 

International

 

553.8 

 

567.2 

 

329.6 

 

501 

 

624 

 

873 

Consolidated sales

 

$         5,230.8

 

$          5,570.8

 

$           4,832.4

 

$            3,041

 

$            4,529

 

$              5,933

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$              13.6

 

$               11.2

 

$                11.6

 

$                 13

 

$                 12

 

$                   13

Canada

 

2.0 

 

2.1 

 

2.5 

 

 

 

International

 

6.7 

 

5.3 

 

2.9 

 

 

 

Total depreciation and amortization expense

 

$              22.3

 

$               18.6

 

$                17.0

 

$                 22

 

$                 21

 

$                   22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of intangibles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$              42.4

 

$               40.0

 

$                40.1

 

$                 41

 

$                 41

 

$                   42

Canada

 

2.4 

 

2.5 

 

4.5 

 

 

 

International

 

7.3 

 

7.0 

 

6.1 

 

 

17 

 

23 

Total amortization of intangibles expense

 

$              52.1

 

$               49.5

 

$                50.7

 

$                 47

 

$                 60

 

$                   68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$            280.1

 

$             358.3

 

$              166.5

Operating (loss) income

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. (1)

 

$                   6

 

$                (47)

 

$                 266

Canada

 

20.9 

 

27.2 

 

17.4 

 

(5)

 

 

28 

International

 

10.8 

 

21.5 

 

10.7 

Total operating income

 

311.8 

 

407.0 

 

194.6 

International (1)

 

(57)

 

(244)

 

Total operating (loss) income

 

(56)

 

(282)

 

302 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

60.7 

 

112.5 

 

136.8 

 

35 

 

48 

 

62 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

 -

 

114.0 

 

 -

Other (income) expense

 

14.2 

 

(1.2)

 

2.0 

Income before income taxes

 

$            236.9

 

$             181.7

 

$                55.8

Other expense

 

 -

 

12 

 

14 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

$                 (91)

 

$              (342)

 

$                 226

(1)Includes goodwill and other intangibles impairment of $237 million and $225 million in 2015 for the U.S. and International segments, respectively.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2016

 

2015

Total assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$         2,732.3

 

$          2,732.4

 

$            1,862

 

$            2,135

Canada

 

204.7 

 

249.1 

 

139 

 

142 

International

 

398.7 

 

388.2 

 

163 

 

220 

Total assets

 

$         3,335.7

 

$          3,369.7

 

$            2,164

 

$            2,497

F-25F-28

 


 

 

The percentages of our fixed assets relating to the following geographic areas are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2016

 

2015

Fixed assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

57% 

 

56% 

 

68% 

 

63% 

Canada

 

24% 

 

24% 

 

15% 

 

16% 

International

 

19% 

 

20% 

 

17% 

 

21% 

Total fixed assets

 

100% 

 

100% 

 

100% 

 

100% 

Our net sales and percentage of total sales by product line are as follows (in thousands)millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

Type

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Energy carbon steel tubular products:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Line pipe

 

$      1,061,881

 

20% 

 

$        1,158,512

 

21% 

 

$        1,033,976

 

21% 

Oil country tubular goods (OCTG)

 

463,656 

 

9% 

 

715,108 

 

13% 

 

809,163 

 

17% 

 

 

$      1,525,537

 

29% 

 

$        1,873,620

 

34% 

 

$        1,843,139

 

38% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valves, fittings, flanges and other products:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valves and specialty products

 

$      1,440,431

 

28% 

 

$        1,431,888

 

26% 

 

$        1,143,234

 

24% 

Carbon steel fittings and flanges and stainless steel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and alloy pipe and fittings

 

1,135,818 

 

22% 

 

1,175,276 

 

21% 

 

870,581 

 

18% 

Other

 

1,129,006 

 

21% 

 

1,090,074 

 

19% 

 

975,469 

 

20% 

 

 

$      3,705,255

 

71% 

 

$        3,697,238

 

66% 

 

$        2,989,284

 

62% 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Year Ended December 31,

Type

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valves, automation, measurement and instrumentation

 

$            1,161

 

38% 

 

$              1,507

 

33% 

 

$              1,911

 

32% 

Carbon steel fittings and flanges

 

460 

 

15% 

 

665 

 

15% 

 

815 

 

14% 

Line pipe (1)

 

444 

 

15% 

 

864 

 

19% 

 

1,139 

 

19% 

Gas products

 

443 

 

14% 

 

475 

 

10% 

 

534 

 

9% 

Stainless steel alloy pipe and fittings

 

206 

 

7% 

 

267 

 

6% 

 

417 

 

7% 

Oil country tubular goods ("OCTG")

 

 -

 

0% 

 

311 

 

7% 

 

556 

 

10% 

Other

 

327 

 

11% 

 

440 

 

10% 

 

561 

 

9% 



 

$            3,041

 

 

 

$              4,529

 

 

 

$              5,933

 

 

(1)As a result of the disposition of our U.S. OCTG product line, as described in Note 2, pre-disposition OCTG sales of $18 million have been included within line pipe sales for the year ended December 31, 2016. 







NOTE 14—15—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.

Interest Rate Contracts:  Interest rate contracts are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. We obtain dealer quotations to value our interest rate swap agreements. These quotations rely on observable market inputs such as yield curves and other market-based factors.

Foreign Exchange Forward and Option Contracts:  Foreign exchange forward contracts are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs, as the fair value is based on broker quotes for the same or similar derivative instruments.

The following table presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis,of foreign exchange forward contracts recorded in our balance sheets was $0 million at December 31, 2016 and the basis for that measurement (in thousands):2015. 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

$       4,603

 

$                      -

 

$              4,603

 

$                          -

 

Liabilities:

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

$              3

 

$                      -

 

$                     3

 

 -

 

Liabilities:

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:Goodwill and other intangible assets are subject to annual impairment testing, which requires a significant degree of management judgment.  If the testing results in impairment, we would measure goodwill and other intangible assets using level 3 non-recurring inputs.  As of December 31, 2015, we recorded impairment charges to both goodwill and other intangible assets; therefore, these assets were classified as level 3 non-recurring fair value measurements. 



F-26


With the exception of long-term debt, the fair values of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate carrying value. The carrying value of our debt was $0.987 billion$414million and $1.257 billion$519  million at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. The fair value of our debt was $417  million and $510  million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The carrying values of our Global ABL Facility approximates its fair value. We estimate the fair value of the Term Loan using Level 2 inputs, or quoted market prices as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. The fair value of our debt was $0.997 billion and $1.261 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The carrying values of our Global ABL Facility and remaining portions of our long-term debt approximate their fair values.

NOTE 15—16—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

We regularly enter into operating and capital lease arrangements for certain of our facilities and equipment. Our leases are renewable at our option for various periods through 2021.2031. Certain renewal options are subject to escalation clauses and contain clauses for payment of real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses of the properties. Leases with escalation clauses based on an index, such as the consumer price index, are expensed and projected based on current rates. Leases with specified escalation steps are expensed and projected based on the rate in effect intotal lease obligation ratably over the respective period which is not materially different thanlife of the straight-line method.lease. We amortize leasehold

F-29


improvements over the remaining life of the lease. Rental expense under our operating lease arrangements was $53.3$48 million, $48.3 $51million and $40.3$53 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012,2016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.



Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating and capital lease arrangements having initial terms of one year or more are as follows (in thousands)millions):



 

 

 

 

Operating Leases

 

Capital Leases

Operating Leases

2014

$             41,328

 

$                628

2015

33,268 

 

297 

2016

24,208 

 

158 

2017

18,448 

 

117 

$       40

2018

14,244 

 

131 
31 

2019

24 

2020

19 

2021

17 

Thereafter

16,686 

 

568 
54 

$           148,182

 

$             1,899

$     185

Legal Proceedings

Asbestos Claims.  We are one of many defendants in lawsuits that plaintiffs have brought seeking damages for personal injuries that exposure to asbestos allegedly caused. Plaintiffs and their family members have brought these lawsuits against a large volume of defendant entities as a result of the various defendants’ manufacture, distribution, supply or other involvement with asbestos, asbestos-containing products or equipment or activities that allegedly caused plaintiffs to be exposed to asbestos. These plaintiffs typically assert exposure to asbestos as a consequence of third-party manufactured products that the Company’s subsidiary, McJunkin Red Man Corporation,MRC Global (US) Inc., purportedly distributed. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we are a named defendant in approximately 279510 lawsuits involving approximately 9301,130 claims.  No asbestos lawsuit has resulted in a judgment against us to date, with the majority being settled, dismissed or otherwise resolved. Applicable third-party insurance has substantially covered these claims, and insurance should continue to cover a substantial majority of existing and anticipated future claims. Accordingly, we have recorded a liability for our estimate of the most likely settlement of asserted claims and a related receivable from insurers for our estimated recovery, to the extent we believe that the amounts of recovery are probable.

We annually conduct analyses of our asbestos-related litigation to estimate the adequacy of the reserve for pending and probable asbestos-related claims. Given these estimated reserves and existing insurance coverage that has been available to cover substantial portions of these claims, we believe that our current accruals and associated estimates relating to pending and probable asbestos-related litigation likely to be asserted over the next 15 years are currently adequate. This belief, however, relies on a number of assumptions, including: 



·

That our future settlement payments, disease mix and dismissal rates will be materially consistent with historic experience;

·

That future incidences of asbestos-related diseases in the U.S. will be materially consistent with current public health estimates;

·

That the rates at which future asbestos-related mesothelioma incidences result in compensable claims filings against us will be materially consistent with its historic experience;

·

That insurance recoveries for settlement payments and defense costs will be materially consistent with historic experience;

F-27


·

That legal standards (and the interpretation of these standards) applicable to asbestos litigation will not change in material respects;

·

That there are no materially negative developments in the claims pending against us; and

·

That key co-defendants in current and future claims remain solvent.

If any of these assumptions prove to be materially different in light of future developments, liabilities related to asbestos-related litigation may be materially different than amounts accrued or estimated. Further, while we anticipate that additional claims will be filed in the future, we are unable to predict with any certainty the number, timing and magnitude of such future claims. In our opinion, there are no pending legal proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Other Legal Claims and Proceedings. From time to time, we have been subject to various claims and involved in legal proceedings incidental to the nature of our businesses. We maintain insurance coverage to reduce financial risk associated with certain of these claims and proceedings. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these claims and proceedings. However, in our opinion, there are no material pending legal proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business,consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.statements.

F-30


Product Claims. From time to time, in the ordinary course of our business, our customers may claim that the products we distribute are either defective or require repair or replacement under warranties that either we or the manufacturer may provide to the customer. These proceedings are, in the opinion of management, ordinary and routine matters incidental to our normal business. Our purchase orders with our suppliers generally require the manufacturer to indemnify us against any product liability claims, leaving the manufacturer ultimately responsible for these claims. In many cases, state, provincial or foreign law provides protection to distributors for these sorts of claims, shifting the responsibility to the manufacturer. In some cases, we could be required to repair or replace the products for the benefit of our customer and seek our recovery from the manufacturer for our expense. In our opinion, the likelihood that the ultimate disposition of any of these claims and legal proceedings is not expected towould have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.statements is remote.

Weatherford Claim.  In addition to PVF, our Canadian subsidiary, Midfield Supply (“Midfield”), now known as MRC Canada, also distributed progressive cavity pumps and related equipment (“PCPs”) under a distribution agreement with Weatherford Canada Partnership (“Weatherford”) within a certain geographical area located in southern Alberta, Canada.  Commencing in late 2005 and into early 2006, Midfield hired new employees, including individuals who left Weatherford, as part of Midfield’s desire to expand its PVF business into northern Alberta.  Shortly thereafter, many of these employees left Midfield and formed a PCP manufacturing, distribution and service company named Europump Systems Inc. (“Europump”) in 2006.  The distribution agreement with Weatherford expired in 2006.  Midfield supplied Europump with PVF products that Europump distributed along with sales of PCP pumps.  In April 2007, Midfield purchased Europump’s distribution branches and began distributing and servicing Europump PCPs.  In 2014, the Company divested its PCP business to Europump, which Halliburton Corporation subsequently purchased.

Pursuant to a complaint that Weatherford filed on April 11, 2006 in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial Bench of Edmonton (Action No. 060304628), Weatherford sued Europump, three of Europump’s part suppliers, Midfield, certain current and former employees of Midfield, as well as other entities related to these parties, asserting a host of claims including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of confidential information related to the PCPs, unlawful interference with economic relations and conspiracy.  The Company denies these allegations and contends that Midfield’s expansion and subsequent growth was the result of fair competition. 

From 2006 through 2012, the case focused largely on Weatherford’s questioning of defense witnesses.  In 2013, the defendants began substantive questioning of Weatherford and its witnesses.  Discovery is ongoing and expected to last through 2014. early 2017.  In April 2016, the court dismissedtwosuppliers from the case.  Weatherford has appealed this dismissal. The case is scheduled for trial inMarch 2018. 

Due to ongoing discovery, and

While the limited information available related to any claimed damages, we cannot reasonably estimate potential loss at this time.  The Company believes Weatherford’s claims are without merit and intendswe intend to defend against them vigorously.vigorously, in November 2015, the Company filed with the Court a formal offer of settlement for $2 million plus one half of the Weatherford party’s costs and interest under the Judgment Interest Act.  Weatherford declined to accept the offer.  As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had recorded a reserve of $3 million associated with this claim.

Customer Contracts

We have contracts and agreements with many of our customers that dictate certain terms of our sales arrangements (pricing, deliverables, etc.). While we make every effort to abide by the terms of these contracts, certain provisions are complex and often subject to varying interpretations. Under the terms of these contracts, our customers have the right to audit our adherence to the contract terms. Historically, any settlements that have resulted from these customer audits have been immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.

Letters of Credit

Our letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 20132016 approximated $33.2$52 million.

F-28




Bank Guarantees

Certain of our international subsidiaries have trade guarantees that banks have issued on their behalf. The amount of these guarantees at December 31, 20132016 was approximately  $6.7$9 million.

Purchase Commitments

We have purchase obligations consisting primarily of inventory purchases made in the normal course of business to meet operating needs. While our vendors often allow us to cancel these purchase orders without penalty, in certain cases, cancellations may subject us to cancellation fees or penalties depending on the terms of the contract.

F-31


Warranty Claims

We are involved from time to time in various warranty claims, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Historically, any settlements that have resulted from these warranty claims have been immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 16—17RESTRUCTURING

In August 2016, we announced a plan to restructure and downsize our Australian operations in response to the continued downturn in the oil and gas and mining industries in the region.  As a result of this plan, we incurred $17 million of charges, including $10 million of inventory-related charges, $4 million of lease termination and property costs,  $2 million of employee severance, and $1 million of other relocation costs.    These charges included $7 million of cash costs.  In the statement of operations, inventory-related charges are reflected in cost of sales while all other costs are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses.  The restructuring plan was substantially completed in the fourth quarter of 2016. 

NOTE 18—QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

Our quarterly financial information is presented in the table below (in millions, except per share amounts):





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

Year

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

$     1,305.1

 

$     1,267.8

 

$     1,313.7

 

$     1,344.2

 

$     5,230.8

Gross profit

246.6 

 

243.9 

 

238.3 

 

226.0 

 

954.8 

Net income (1)

46.2 

 

43.9 

 

38.8 

 

23.3 

 

152.1 

EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       Basic (1)

$          0.45

 

$          0.43

 

$          0.38

 

$          0.23

 

$          1.50

       Diluted (1)

$          0.45

 

$          0.43

 

$          0.38

 

$          0.23

 

$          1.48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

$     1,382.6

 

$     1,430.4

 

$     1,451.1

 

$     1,306.7

 

$     5,570.8

Gross profit

236.6 

 

241.7 

 

277.2 

 

258.3 

 

1,013.7 

Net income (loss) (1)

37.5 

 

31.3 

 

55.5 

 

(6.4)

 

118.0 

EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       Basic (1)

$          0.44

 

$          0.32

 

$          0.55

 

$          (0.06)

 

$          1.22

       Diluted (1)

$          0.44

 

$          0.32

 

$          0.54

 

$          (0.06)

 

$          1.22



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

Year

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

$          783

 

$          746

 

$          793

 

$          719

 

$       3,041

Gross profit

133 

 

125 

 

88 

 

122 

 

468 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

(14)

 

(23)

 

(46)

 

(24)

 

(107)

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       Basic  (1)

$         (0.14)

 

$         (0.24)

 

$         (0.48)

 

$         (0.25)

 

$         (1.10)

       Diluted (1)

$         (0.14)

 

$         (0.24)

 

$         (0.48)

 

$         (0.25)

 

$         (1.10)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue  (1)

$       1,292

 

$       1,198

 

$       1,071

 

$          967

 

$       4,529

Gross profit

220 

 

206 

 

185 

 

175 

 

786 

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders (1)

29 

 

15 

 

10 

 

(399)

 

(344)

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       Basic  (1)

$         0.28

 

$         0.15

 

$         0.10

 

$         (3.92)

 

$         (3.38)

       Diluted (1)

$         0.28

 

$         0.15

 

$         0.10

 

$         (3.92)

 

$         (3.38)

 _______________

(1)NetRevenue, net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders and EPSearnings per share do not add across due to rounding and transactions resulting in differing weighted average shares outstanding on a quarterly basis.



NOTE 17—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In January 2014, we terminated a profit sharing agreement with respect to certain oilfield supply and service stores in western Canada. This profit sharing agreement required us to make annual profit sharing payments to Europump related to PVF sales in the heavy oil region of Canada.  In conjunction with the termination of this agreement, we sold our progressive cavity pump (“PCP”) distribution and servicing business to Europump, our primary supplier of PCP pumps.  We believe this divestiture will allow us to focus on our core business of supplying PVF products and services to the energy and industrial markets. We expect the impact of this divestiture to be a reduction in sales of approximately $82 million in 2014; however, through the elimination of costs associated with the business, including the profit sharing payments to Europump, we expect the impact of the sale will have a modestly accretive impact on profitability going forward.  However, we do anticipate a first quarter 2014 pre-tax charge of approximately $7 million ($4.6 million after-tax) associated with the termination of the profit sharing agreement.

In January 2014, we completed the $260 million acquisition of Stream AS.  Headquartered in Norway, Stream is the leading pipe, valve and fittings distributor and provider of flow control products, solutions and services to the offshore oil and gas industry on the Norwegian Continental Shelf.  The purchase price was funded with existing availability under our Global ABL Facility as well as cash on hand. 

F-29F-32