Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Picture 1


FORM 10-K


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

2019

COMMISSION FILE NO. 001001‑-3761537615

ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Georgia

20-5728270

Georgia20-5728270

(State of Incorporation)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3280 Peachtree

945 East Paces Ferry Road NE, Suite 1600 Atlanta, Georgia

30305

30326

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (404) 995-6050

Title of each class

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (404) 995-6050
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Title of each classThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Common Stock, no par value

(NASDAQ

ACBI

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq Global Select Market)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ]  No  [x]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ]  No  [x]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes [x]  No  [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [x]  No  [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-212b‑2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

[ ]

Accelerated filer

[x]

Non-accelerated filer

[ ]

Smaller reporting company

[ ]

Emerging growth company

[x]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-212b‑2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes [ ]  No  [x]

As of June 30, 201728, 2019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $413.5$330.2 million based upon the closing sale price as reported on NASDAQ.Nasdaq. See Part II, Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for additional information.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class

Class

Outstanding at March 8, 20189, 2020

Common Stock, no par value per share

25,760,899

21,590,313 shares


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant has incorporated by reference into Part III of this report certain portions of its Proxy Statement for its 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.


2019.


Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc.

Form 10-K

10‑K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

No.

PART I.

Page
No.

PART I.

Item 1.

Business

Item 1.
Item 1A.

15

Item 1B.

35

Item 2.

Properties

36

Item 3.

36

Item 4.

36

PART II.

Item 5.

37

Item 6.

39

Item 7.

43

Item 7A.

65

Item 8.

66

67

68

69

70

71

Item 9.

117

Item 9A.

118

Item 9B.

119

PART III

Item 10.

120

Item 11.

120

Item 12.

120

Item 13.

120

Item 14.

120

PART IV

Item 15.

121

Item 16.

Form 10‑K Summary

121

121

Signatures

126


PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and our financial performance. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “will likely result,” “expect,” “continue,” “will,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “would” and “outlook,” or the negative version of those words or other comparable of a future or forward-looking nature. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, assumptions and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

The following risks, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:

·

our strategic decision to focus on the greater Atlanta market may not positively impact our financial condition in the expected timeframe, or at all;

the expected growth opportunities and cost savings from the transaction with First Security Group, Inc. (“First Security”) may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected;

·

costs associated with our growth and hiring initiatives in the Atlanta market area;

costs associated with, and fluctuations in income resulting from, strategic decisions with respect to particular locations or lines

·

risks associated with increased geographic concentration, borrower concentration and concentration in commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans resulting from our exit of the Tennessee and northwest Georgia markets and our strategic realignment;

·

our strategic decision to increase our focus on SBA and franchise lending may expose us to additional risks associated with these types of lending, including industry concentration risks, our ability to sell the guaranteed portion of SBA loans, the impact of negative economic conditions on small businesses’ ability to repay the non-guaranteed portions of SBA loans, and changes to applicable federal regulations;

·

risks associated with our ability to manage the planned growth of our payment processing business, including evolving regulations, security risks, and unforeseen increases in transaction volume resulting from changes in our customers’ businesses and changes in the competitive landscape for payment processing;

·

changes in asset quality and credit risk;

·

the cost and availability of capital;

·

customer acceptance of our products and services;

·

customer borrowing, repayment, investment and deposit practices;

·

the introduction, withdrawal, success and timing of business initiatives;

·

the impact, extent, and timing of technological changes;

·

severe catastrophic events in our geographic area;

·

a weakening of the economies in which we conduct operations may adversely affect our operating results;

·

the U.S. legal and regulatory framework could adversely affect the operating results of the Company;

·

the interest rate environment may compress margins and adversely affect net interest income;

1

changes in asset quality and credit risk;

·

our ability to anticipate or respond to interest rate changes correctly and manage interest rate risk presented through unanticipated changes in our interest rate risk position and/or short- and long-term interest rates;

the cost and availability

·

changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies of various governmental bodies and central banks could affect the economic environment in which we operate;

·

our ability to determine accurate values of certain assets and liabilities;

·

adverse developments in securities, public debt, and capital markets, including changes in market liquidity and volatility;

·

unanticipated changes in our liquidity position, including but not limited to our ability to enter the financial markets to manage and respond to any changes to our liquidity position;

·

the impact of the transition from LIBOR and our ability to adequately manage such transition;

·

adequacy of our risk management program;

·

increased competitive pressure due to consolidation in the financial services industry;

·

risks related to security breaches, cybersecurity attacks, and other significant disruptions in our information technology systems; and

·

other risks and factors identified in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K under the heading “Risk Factors.”

2

customer acceptance of our products and services;
customer borrowing, repayment, investment and deposit practices;
the introduction, withdrawal, success and timing of business initiatives;
the impact, extent, and timing of technological changes;
severe catastrophic events in our geographic area;
a weakening of the economies in which we conduct operations may adversely affect our operating results;
the U.S. legal and regulatory framework, including those associated with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), could adversely affect the operating results of the company;
the interest rate environment may compress margins and adversely affect net interest income;
changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies of various governmental bodies and central banks could affect the economic environment in which we operate;
our ability to determine accurate values of certain assets and liabilities;
adverse developments in securities, public debt, and capital markets, including changes in market liquidity and volatility;
our ability to anticipate or respond to interest rate changes correctly and manage interest rate risk presented through unanticipated changes in our interest rate risk position and/or short- and long-term interest rates;
unanticipated changes in our liquidity position, including but not limited to our ability to enter the financial markets to manage and respond to any changes to our liquidity position;
adequacy of our risk management program;
increased costs associated with operating as a public company;
increased competitive pressure due to consolidation in the financial services industry;
risks related to security breaches, cybersecurity attacks and other significant disruptions in our information technology systems;
the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted on December 22, 2017; and
other risks and factors identified in this Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors.”


Background

Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “Atlantic Capital,” or the “Company”), a Georgia corporation organized in 2006 and headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is the parent of Atlantic Capital Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”).  The Bank operates as a full service, locally-managed commercial bank with 15 full service branches located primarily in the metropolitan areas of Atlanta, Georgia and Chattanooga and Knoxville, Tennessee.

We provide a competitive array of credit, treasury management, capital markets, electronic banking and deposit products and services to emerging growth businesses, middle market corporations, commercial real estate developersthrough dedicated and investors, and private clientsexperienced banking teams.

In 2015, we became a publicly held company through corporate and business banking, commercial real estate finance, specialty corporate financial services, and private banking teams. We also provide selected capital markets, mortgage banking, and electronic banking services to our corporate, business, and individual clients.

On October 31, 2015, Atlantic Capital completed its acquisition of First Security Group, Inc. and its subsidiary FSGBank,FSG Bank, N.A. (“FSGBank”First Security”), a $1.14 billion financial institution headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Since 2016, we have steadily refocused our efforts on providing core commercial and private banking products and growing our specialty financial services business in Atlanta and the surrounding market areas and with select national client segments. 

During 2019, we expanded our operations in Atlanta and the surrounding markets, establishing a standalone branch in Atlanta’s Buckhead community, converting our Athens, Georgia loan production office to a branch, and opening a production office in Cobb County, Georgia. In 2019, we also completed our exit of the Tennessee and northwest Georgia markets with the sale of 14 branches located in those markets and the residential mortgage banking business associated with those branches (the “Branch Sale”). In

Although we incurred expenses in connection with these activities, we expect our recent strategic changes to have a positive impact on our financial results, including long-term cost savings, the acquisition, Atlantic Capital’s subsidiary Atlantic Capital Bank, a Georgia chartered commercial bank, merged withreallocation of resources to the Atlanta market and into FSGBank, N.A, which subsequently changed its namein high-growth businesses, improved capital to Atlantic Capital Bank, N.A. In connection with the acquisition, Atlantic Capital issued approximately 8,790,193 sharessupport our strategic initiatives, and improved profitability. See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of common stock as partial consideration to former shareholdersFinancial Condition and Results of First Security, with the remaining consideration consisting of approximately $47.1 million in cash. In conjunction with the merger, Atlantic Capital also completed a $25.0 million private placement of Atlantic Capital common stock, at $12.60 per share. Atlantic Capital used a portion of the proceeds from this private placement and a $50.0 million private placement of subordinated notes completed on September 28, 2015, to fund the cash portion of the merger consideration. Atlantic Capital acquired approximately $970 million of loans and loans held for sale, and assumed approximately $801 million of deposits with the merger.

Operations.”

Our Business Strategy

Our objective is to continue to build Atlantic Capital as Atlanta’s premier hometown business bank.

We are a premier bank operating in key metropolitan markets across the southeastern United States. In particular, we focusteam of talented, experienced and entrepreneurial bankers focused on client segments where weserving commercial and not-for-profit enterprises, commercial real estate developers and individual clients that value high-touch relationships and deep expertise.

We believe the expertise and experience of our bankers, competitive and sophisticated service capabilities, and high touch service delivery canstrengths differentiate us from our competitors. Additionally,competitors and allow us to address the financial needs of our clients. We also believe that these clients will present us with opportunities to originate loans and utilize our treasury management expertise. We will continue to focus on maintaining industry diversity in our target client base in order to mitigate our loan portfolio risk, increase market presence and leverage the diverse industry experience of our commercial and business banking teams.

We recognize that the success of our franchise depends upon the success of our bankers. We are focused on hiring and retaining experienced bankers, providing them with the business development and client service tools they need to build and maintain long-term banking relationships through a deep understanding of each client’s business. We also construct client service teams with the range of expertise necessary to provide collaborative and seamless high-touch service across product lines. We are committed to continued investment through recruiting and employee development as well as product innovation, primarily in our core commercial banking business and our deposit-based and payment processing business. We continually evaluate our product offerings, and we offer retail banking in selective markets whererely heavily on input from our bankers as we refine our products to provide creative financial solutions tailored to the evolving needs of our clients.

To support our strategic initiatives, we focus on maintaining a balance sheet with strong capital levels and excellent credit quality, which we believe we can provide community banking services on a competitive basis. The essenceenable us to not only nimbly expand our teams of ourservice providers as hiring opportunities arise, but also to originate larger loans, invest in new business strategy is to build enduringlines, and growing relationships with carefully selected corporate, business,attract deposits from high transaction volume payments and individual clients by providing tailored financial solutions and services to them from a broad range of credit, and treasury management and depository capabilities. technology businesses.

We believe a growing number of client relationships with income streams from multiple services provided will result, over time, in reliable and consistent earnings and returns on our shareholders’ capital. The implementation of our strategy is dependent on providing our customers with a suite of products and services customized to suit their needs while maximizing the efficiency of our operations. In order to manage our geographic footprint, we continually evaluate the profitability and viability of our existing locations as well as opportunities to expand into complementary markets. We are also engaged in ongoing evaluationlines of business, the strategic advantages associated with investment in the organic development or acquisition of lines of business that better serve our core banking customers, and the termination of under-used or unprofitable lines of business.

In 2016 through early 2017, as part

3

Commercial and approximately $9 million in other assets.

On December 14, 2017, we entered into an agreement to sell our trust and wealth management division, which is a legacy First Security line of business operating as Southeastern Trust Company, with the sale expected to close in the second quarter of 2018. In addition, in January 2018, we announced the closing of our loan production office in Charlotte, North Carolina and consolidating two legacy First Security branches located in Chattanooga, Tennessee during the first quarter of 2018. Although we expect to incur professional services and salary and benefits expenses in connection with these transactions, none of these proposed strategic changes is expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Our Products and Services
Corporate and BusinessNot-for-Profit Banking
We focus our corporate and business banking activities on the complex needs of emerging growth businesses and middle market companies. We address the needs of our corporate and business banking clients with experienced bankers and advanced treasury management services technology.

We offer a full suiterange of corporatecommercial and business banking credit products to fund a client’sour Georgia-based clients’ strategic growth, capital expenditures, working capital requirements and strategic corporate finance activities. Our solutions include working



capital and equipment loans, loans supported by owner-occupied real estate and strategic corporate financing funded through revolving lines of credit, term loans and letters of credit.
credit, as well as cash and treasury management services.

We focus on banking commercial companies with revenues in excess of $10 million and small businesses with revenues up to $10 million based in Georgia. We also participate in syndicated loans to larger borrowers, generally located in the southeast. In addition to customary commercial loans, we offer SBA loans and franchise finance loans to small businesses and franchisees across a wide range of industries in the southeast and nationally through a dedicated team of bankers with expertise in these specialized forms of lending. We offer SBA loans under the 7a program as well as the 504 program and periodically offer loans guaranteed by the USDA. 

The terms of our corporatecommercial and not-for-profit enterprises and business banking loans vary by purpose and by the underlying collateral, if any.collateral. The vast majority of these loans are secured by assets of the borrower; however, we periodically make unsecured loans to our most credit worthy clients when circumstances support such activity. Loans to support working capital typically have terms not exceeding one year and are usually fully-secured by accounts receivable and inventory, as well as by personal guarantees of the principals or owners of the business. For loans secured by accounts receivable or inventory, the principal balance is repaid as the assets securing the loan are converted into cash. For loans secured with other types of collateral, the principal balance generally amortizes over the term of the loan. The quality of the corporatecommercial borrower’s management and its ability to both properly evaluate and respond to changes affecting its business operations and operating environment are significant factors we evaluate with respect to a commercial borrower’s creditworthiness.

In addition to analyzing the creditworthiness of franchisee borrowers, we also perform analysis on the franchisors to ensure these franchisees have adequate support from a financially sound franchisor.

Deposit and Processing Focused Businesses

Through our highly experienced corporate financial services team, we provide an array of treasury management, payment processing and deposit services.

Our corporate financial services are tailored to the needs of clients located across the country in particular industries, such as payroll services, financial technology, financial services and banking. Our corporate treasury management services are designed to improve our clients’ financial efficiency by facilitating domestic and international collection and disbursement of funds and other transactions with real time online execution and reporting capabilities. Our electronic payments services are designed to assist high transaction volume clients with payment processing through the Automated Clearing House (ACH) and FedWire systems as well as transaction risk monitoring and management. We offer money market deposit accounts that allow financial institution clients to earn a higher return than that available on other short term investment or on balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. In addition, we offer capital markets services, including interest rate swaps and foreign exchange transactions, designed to assist clients in managing financial risk exposure.

Private Banking

Our

Through our private banking business team, focuses on serving the banking needs of professional firms throughout our regional markets, the principals of our corporate and commercial real estate clients, and other private clients. Wewe offer personal credit products, an array of checking and savings products and online and mobile banking services.

Our private banking credit products include loans to individuals and professional services businesses for personal and investment purposes, such as secured installment and term loans and home equity lines of credit. Repayment of these loans is often primarily dependent upon the borrower’s financial profile and is more likely to be adversely affected by personal hardships as compared to other types of loans. Our loan officersCredit decisions are based on a review of a borrower’s credit and debt history, past income levels and cash flow and determine the impact of all these factors onto assess the ability of the borrower to make future payments. Home equity lines of credit are underwritten based upon our assessment of the borrower’s credit profile and perceived ability to repay the entirety of the obligation.

Retail Banking

4

Our retail banking business includes one office in Atlanta, GA, three offices in northwest Georgia, six offices in the Chattanooga, TN area and five offices in northeast Tennessee. Through these offices we provide community banking service to consumer and small business clients. We offer transaction accounts as well as savings accounts and time deposits and provide access to these services through the branch offices, ATM’s, online banking as well as mobile banking. Additionally, we provide safe deposit services in most offices.
Our retail banking credit products include loans to small commercial enterprises as well as loans to individuals. Our small business loans include lines

Commercial Real Estate Finance

Our

Through our commercial real estate team, is highly focused onwe offer a select groupwide variety of clients characterized by superior financial resources and long industry experience. We believe our focus on “top-tier” clients provides us with larger loan opportunities, which enables us to achieve desired commercial real estate loan production with a relatively smaller team of experienced bankers.

Our primary commercial real estate loan types includeproducts, including secured construction loans, secured mini‑mini permanent loans and, less frequently, secured or unsecured lines of credit. A large majority of our commercial real estate loan portfolio is secured by a first mortgage security interest in the property financed. Our primary focus is providing loans for our core commercial real estate property types: multifamily (primarily for-rent) housing, office, industrial and retail properties. We occasionally extend unsecured credit to public real estate investment trusts and to certain other commercial real estate clients, which we believe to have exceptional credit quality. We focus almost exclusively on providing loans for our core commercial real estate property types: multifamily (primarily for-rent) housing, office, industrial and retail properties.
In keeping with our “top-tier” client strategy, virtually allThe majority of our commercial real estate customers are based in our primary market areas. Accordingly,and the largest proportion of our commercial real estate collateral isare located in these markets.the Atlanta area. We have occasionally extended credit to select clients in markets outside our primary markets, and expect to continue to do this in certain circumstances.


The majority of our total commercial real estate loans have been used to finance stabilized income producing assets of our borrowers. We have also extended a smaller percentage ofextend loans for construction and development purposes and lines of credit. We seek to actively manage and balance our commercial real estate loan portfolio across various property types and industries to assure appropriate diversification and to manage our exposure to market conditions. We have arranged and participated in syndicated commercial real estate loans to diversify and mitigate our loanclient concentration risk and to support our loan growth goals, and we may continue both in the future. Overall, our goal is to maintain frequent contact with our borrowers and, through that contact, build a deep understanding of each client’s business strategy, property status and overall financial strength and flexibility.

Specialty Corporate Financial Services
Our specialty corporate financial services team provides treasury management services, payments industry banking, financial institutions banking, capital markets services, and specialty commercial lending to emerging growth businesses, middle market corporations, payroll companies, and other banks on a selected basis in the southeastern United States and nationally.
Corporate treasury management services are designed to facilitate domestic and international collection and disbursement of client funds with real time online execution and reporting capabilities. We believe our services are competitive with those offered by large regional and national competitors. Our corporate treasury management professionals are highly experienced and provide expert advice to our clients.
We offer electronic payments services to payroll companies and other high transaction volume clients through the FedWire and Automated Clearing House (ACH) systems. These services generate substantial fee income and demand deposit balances for us. We use sophisticated systems capabilities and the expertise of our people to process high transaction volumes and manage and monitor risks associated with this activity.
Other financial institutions throughout the southeastern United States maintain money market deposit accounts with us to earn a higher return than that available on other short term investment or on balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. Our strong capitalization levels and superior credit quality have helped us attract large deposit amounts from other banks.
We provide targeted capital markets services, principally interest rate protection and foreign exchange, to our business and corporate clients, and loan sales and syndications to our bank clients. Spot and forward foreign exchange transactions are provided through third parties on a private label basis. Interest rate swaps are offered to our clients to hedge interest rate exposure on loans and are fully hedged on our books with mirror transactions with other financial institutions.
Specialty commercial loans consist of Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans and franchise finance programs. We offer these loans to small businesses and franchisees across a wide range of industries in the southeast and nationally with a dedicated team of bankers with expertise in these specialized forms of lending.
Residential Mortgage
Our residential mortgage loan department primarily originates loans for sale into the secondary market. We generally do not retain long-term, fixed rate residential real estate loans in our portfolio due to interest rate and collateral risks and low levels of profitability. The limited amount of residential loans to individuals that are retained in our loan portfolio primarily consist of first liens on 1-4 family residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit.
Trust & Wealth Management
We offer wealth management services including private client services, financial planning, trust administration, investment management, brokerage and estate planning services. Our trust and wealth management business is branded as Southeastern Trust Company and serves clients throughout the southeastern United States. As discussed above, we have made the strategic decision to sell our trust and wealth management division, which we expect to occur in the second quarter of 2018.

Competition and Market Area

We face substantial competition in all areas of our operations from a variety of different competitors, many of which are larger and may have more financial resources than we do. Such competitors primarily include national, regional, and Internet banks within the various markets in which we operate. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including, without limitation, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, and other financial intermediaries.



The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory, and technological changes and continued consolidation. In particular, recent consolidations and disruption in our Atlanta market could result in increased competition as both established institutions and new market entrants position themselves to attract new customers and quality employees. Banks, securities firms, and insurance companies can merge under the umbrella of a financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (both agency and underwriting),underwriting, and merchant banking. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Many of our non-bank competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. Additionally, due to their size, many competitors may be able to achieve economies of scale and, as a result, may offer a broader range of products and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than we can.

As of June 30, 2017,2019, there were approximately 8877 banks and thrifts operating in metropolitan Atlanta, 27 in the Chattanooga market, and 47 in the Knoxville market. We believe the largeAtlanta. Large national, super-regional and regional banks are our primary competitors. However, we believe that large banks oftenmay lack the consistency of decision‑decision making authority and local focus necessary to provide superior service to our target markets.clients. Conversely, smaller community banks typically lack the sophisticated products, capital and management experience to provide fullthe level of service tothat our target markets. Through our focused business model, experienced management team and broad line of products and services, we believe we efficiently provide clients with loan, deposit and other financial products tailored to fit their specific needs.

Our corporate and business banking clients represent a variety of industry sectors, including industrial and manufacturing, financial services, business services, not-for-profit, consumer service and retail. We intend to continue diversifying our client base across industries as a way to diversify our loan portfolio risk, gain market presence and leverage the industry experience of our corporate and business banking team. We also intend to further expand our corporate and business banking client base by cross-selling our services to clients of our deposit and treasury services and by soliciting relationships with new clients and capitalizing on prospective clients eager to explore new banking relationships. Moreover, we seek to become the primary banking relationship for our clients by remaining intensely focused on serving their needs. To achieve this position, we focus on providing significant expertise and capability to execute transactions, a deep understanding of our client’s business and banking needs and attentive care from senior and experienced bankers that a client might not obtain from larger banking institutions.
Our Competitive Strengths
We enjoy a number of important competitive strengths that we believe will drive our success and differentiate us from our competitors.
Market Focus
We believe that emerging growth businesses, middle market companies, commercial real estate developers, their principals, investors and other private clients are often unable to have all of their banking needs met by large financial institutions or small community banks. We are designed to provide the consistency of attention, local leadership and necessary decision-making authority that large financial institutions often lack. We also offer the sophisticated products, capital and expertise required by these clients that are typically absent from small community banks. Every aspect of Atlantic Capital is focused on serving our target clients’ unique and complex needs.
Experienced Bankers
Our bankers focus on serving corporate, business, and private clients in our primary market areas. We have attracted seasoned senior bankers who have enjoyed successful careers at one or more of our large national competitors and who understand and believe in our strategy and target market focus. Our bankers offer sophisticated advice, a deep knowledge of the client’s business and of local markets as well as personalized client service.demand. We believe that our banking team’s highly-tailored focusproduct offerings are more robust than those offered by community banks and significant personal network, along with their substantial decision‑makingmore tailored to suit our clients’ needs than those offered by large regional and national competitors. In addition, we believe that our collaborative team approach, the decision-making authority vested in our seasoned bankers and our streamlined credit approval process enableallow us to offer services and products to our target market more effectively and efficiently than our competitors.
Flexible, Client-Focused Technology
Our operating platform andprovide high-touch service capabilities were developed fromat a broad array of market‑leading third-party technologies built specifically to serve the banking needslevel not offered by any of our target markets. Our technology solutions, in particular, our treasury services, are designed to improve a client’s “backroom” efficiency by allowing the client to process a varietycompetitors.

5




Credit Culture Designed to Yield Superior Asset Quality
We believe that maintaining superior asset quality allows us to remain focused on acquiring new clients and providing attentive service to current clients and helps ensure consistent earnings performance. Since our inception in 2006, we have maintained sound credit quality despite a global financial crisis, a severe recession, and a modest economic expansion.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we employed 353204 individuals (348(202 of whom were full-time equivalent employees). MostAll of our employees are only employees of the Bank. We are not a party to a collective bargaining agreement, and we consider our relations with employees to be good.

Segment Reporting
We consider our operations to be a single business segment as defined in ASC 280, Segment Reporting. We have determined that our lending divisions meet the aggregation criteria of ASC 280 as the products and services, nature of the production processes, types of customers, methods used to distribute products and services and the regulatory environment are sufficiently similar to aggregate their results. For financial information regarding the results of our only reportable segment for each of the last five fiscal years, refer to Item 6, “Selected Financial Data” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Additional Information

Our principal internet address is www.atlanticcapitalbank.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K. We have included our website address as a factual reference and do not intend it as an active link to our website. We provide our Annual Reports on Form 10-K,10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,10‑Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K,8‑K, and all amendments to those reports, free of charge on www.atlanticcapitalbank.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Supervision and Regulation

Bank holding companies and national banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. The following is a brief summary of certain statutes and rules and regulations that affect or will affect the Company and the Bank. This summary is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to their respective businesses. Supervision, regulation and examination of the Company and the Bank by regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors rather than shareholders of the Company. The Company cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed statute or regulation will be adopted or the extent to which the business of the Company and the Bank may be affected by a statute or regulation. The discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable laws and regulations. Changes in such laws and regulations may have a material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s business and prospects.

Bank Holding Company Regulation and Structure

Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc.

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”) and to the regulation, supervision, and examination by the Federal Reserve. The Bank is chartered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and thus is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the OCC.

Acquisitions

The BHCA requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before:

·

it may acquire substantially all of the assets of any other bank holding company, or direct or indirect ownership or control of voting shares of any other bank holding company if, after the acquisition, the bank holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of the other bank holding company;

it may acquire substantially all of the assets of any other bank holding company, or direct or indirect ownership or control of voting shares of any other bank holding company if, after the acquisition, the bank holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of the other bank holding company;

·

it may acquire substantially all of the assets of any other bank, or direct or indirect ownership or control of voting shares of any bank if, after the acquisition, the bank holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of the bank;

·

it or any of its subsidiaries, other than a bank, may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any other bank, or direct or indirect ownership or control of voting shares of any bank if, after the acquisition, the bank holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of the bank; or

it or any of its subsidiaries, other than a bank, may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank;

·

it may merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company.

it may merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company.


The BHCA further provides that the Federal Reserve may not approve any transaction that would result in a monopoly or that would substantially lessen competition in the banking business, unless the public interest in meeting the needs of the communities to be served outweighs the anti-competitive effects. The Federal Reserve is also required to consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding companies and banks involved and the convenience and needs of the communities to be served. Consideration of financial resources generally focuses on capital adequacy and consideration of convenience and needs issues, which focuses, in part, on the performance under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (the “CRA”).

6

Change in Bank Control

Subject to various exceptions, the BHCA and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with related regulations, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person or company acquiring “control” of a bank holding company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of a bank holding company. Control is also presumed to exist, although rebuttable, if a person or company acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of voting securities and either:

·

the bank holding company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act; or

the bank holding company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act; or

·

no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction.

no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction.

Our common stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging rebuttable presumptions of control.

The

Permitted Activities

Except in certain situations prescribed by statute (including exemptions for financial holding companies), the BHCA generally prohibits a bank holding company from engaging in, or acquiring 5% or more of the voting stock of a company engagedthat is not a bank holding company or a bank, and from engaging in activities other than banking; managing or controlling banks or other permissible subsidiaries and performing servicing activities for subsidiaries; and engaging in any activities other than activities that the Federal Reserve has determined by order or regulation are so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident included thereto under the BHCA. In determining whether a particular activity is permissible, the Federal Reserve considers whether performing the activity can be expected to produce benefits to the public that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound banking practices. The Federal Reserve has the power to order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or control of any subsidiary when the continuation of the activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary of that bank holding company.

Under the BHCA, a bank holding company may file an election with the Federal Reserve to be treated as a financial holding company and engage in an expanded list ofadditional financial activities. The election must be accompanied by a certification that the Company’s insured depository institution subsidiary is “well capitalized” and “well managed.” Additionally, the CRA rating of each subsidiary bank must be satisfactory or better. The Company has not elected to be treated as a financial holding company.

Support of Bank Subsidiaries

We are required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength for the Bank and to commit resources to support the Bank. This support may be required at times when the Company mightit would not be inclinedin the best interests of the Company’s shareholders or creditors to provide it. In addition, any capital loans made by the Company to the Bank will be repaid only after the Bank’s deposits and various other obligations are repaid in full.

Atlantic Capital Bank, N.A.

The Bank is chartered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and thus is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the OCC.

Bank Merger Act

Section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, commonly known as the “Bank Merger Act,” requires the prior written approval of the OCC before any national bank may (i) merge or consolidate with, (ii) purchase or otherwise acquire the assets of, or (iii) assume the deposit liabilities of, another bank if the resulting institution is to be a national bank.

7

The Bank Merger Act prohibits the OCC from approving any proposed merger transaction that would result in a monopoly or would further a combination or conspiracy to monopolize or to attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any part of the United States. Similarly, the Bank Merger Act prohibits the OCC from approving a proposed merger transaction whose effect in any section of the country may be to lessen competition substantially, or to tend to create a monopoly, or which in any other manner would be in restraint of trade. An exception may be made in the case of a merger transaction whose effect would be to substantially lessen competition, tend to create a monopoly, or otherwise restrain trade, if the OCC finds that the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by the probable effect of the transaction in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served.

In every proposed merger transaction, the OCC must also consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the existing and resulting institutions, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, and the effectiveness of each insured depository institution involved in the proposed merger transaction in combating money-laundering activities, including in overseas branches.




Capital Adequacy

The final rule adopted by the federal banking regulators in 2013 implementing the Basel III regulatory capital reforms published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in “Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems” (“Basel III”) established new prompt corrective action requirements for all banks and includes a new common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) risk-based capital measure. CET1 consists of common stock and paid in capital and retained earnings. CET1 is reduced by goodwill, certain intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities, deferred tax assets that arise from tax credit and net operating loss carryforwards, net of any valuation allowance, and certain other items specified in the Basel III capital rules. The capital rules also provide for a number of adjustments to CET1. These include the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, certain deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent such items exceed 10% of CET1 individually or 15% of CET1 in the aggregate.

The risk-based capital and leverage capital requirements under the final rule are set forth in the table that follows.

Requirement

Total Risk Based Capital Ratio

Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio

CET1 Risk Based Capital Ratio

Leverage Ratio

Well Capitalized

Requirement

≥ 10%

≥ 8%

Capital Ratio

≥ 6.5%

≥ 5%

Capital Ratio

Capital Ratio

Leverage Ratio

Adequately

Well Capitalized

≥ 10%

≥ 8%

6%6.5%

4.5%

≥ 4%5%

Undercapitalized

Adequately Capitalized

≥ 8%

≥ 6%

≥ 4.5%

≥ 4%

Significantly

Undercapitalized

≥ 8%

≥ 6%

≥ 4.5%

≥ 4%

≥ 3%≥ 3%

Significantly Undercapitalized

≥ 6%

≥ 4%

≥ 3%

≥ 3%

Critically Undercapitalized

Tangible equity to total assets ≤ 2


The final rule also sets forthestablished a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% (which was fully phased in as of January 1, 2019), consisting of CET1 capital, above the regulatory minimum capital ratios. Accordingly, an institution will be subject to limitations on capital distributions, dividend payments, share repurchases and payment of discretionary bonuses to executive officers if the institution’s capital falls below the following minimum ratios: (i) total risk-based capital ratio phase-in schedule. The phase-in provisions for banks with $250 billion or less in total assets are set forth in the following table.

Effective as of January 1,2016201720182019
Minimum Leverage Ratio4.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%
Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio4.5%4.5%4.5%4.5%
Capital Conservation Buffer (1)
0.625%1.25%1.875%2.5%
Minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio with Capital Conservation Buffer5.125%5.75%6.375%7.0%
Minimum Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio6.0%6.0%6.0%6.0%
Minimum Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio with Capital    
Conservation Buffer6.625%7.25%7.875%8.5%
Minimum Total Risk Based Capital Ratio8.0%8.0%8.0%8.0%
Minimum Total Risk Based Capital Ratio with Capital    
Conservation Buffer8.625%9.25%9.875%10.5%

(1)The capital conservation buffer must be maintained in order for a banking organization to avoid being subject to limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments, and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers.
of 10.5%, (ii) Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of 7.0%.

The final rule includes comprehensive guidance with respect to the measurement of risk‑weightedrisk-weighted assets. For residential mortgages, Basel III retains the risk-weights contained in the current capital rules which assign a risk-weight of 50% to most first-lien exposures and 100% to other residential mortgage exposures. The final rule increased the risk-weights associated with certain on-balance sheet assets, such asincluding 150% for high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans, and for the unsecured portion of non-residential mortgage loans that are more than 90 days past due or in nonaccrual status. Capital requirements were also increased for certain off-balance sheetequity exposures, including, for example,securities lending transactions, OTC derivatives and loan commitments with an original maturity of one year or less.

8

Under the final rule, certain banking organizations, including the Company and the Bank, are permitted to make a one-time election to continue the current treatment of excluding from regulatory capital most accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) components, including amounts relating to unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities and amounts attributable to defined benefit post-retirement plans. Institutions that elect to exclude most AOCI components from regulatory capital under Basel III will be able to avoid volatility that would otherwise be caused by things such as the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on the fair value of available-for-sale debt securities. The Company and the Bank elected to exclude AOCI components from regulatory capital under Basel III.

Liquidity

In December 2010,2017, the Basel Committee published “Basel III: International Framework for Liquidity Risk Measurement, Standardsan update of Basel III (“Basel IV”). The Basel Committee stated that a key objective of Basel IV is to reduce excessive variability of risk-weighted assets in order to enhance comparability of financial institutions’ capital ratios; constrain the use of internally modeled approaches; and Monitoring”complement the risk-weighted capital ratio with a finalized leverage ratio and in January 2013 published a revised liquidity coverageminimum capital requirement. The federal banking agencies are considering how to appropriately apply the Basel IV standards to institutions in the United States. It is uncertain which of the Basel IV standards will be incorporated into the capital regulations and what effect those standards might have on the Company or the Bank.

On October 29, 2019, the federal banking regulators adopted a final rule, which was effective as of January 1, 2020, to simplify the regulatory capital requirements for certain community banks and holding companies that opt into the Community Bank Leverage ratio (collectively referred(“CBLR”) framework. In order to asbe eligible to opt in to the “Liquidity Standard”)CBLR framework, an institution must have less than $10 billion in average consolidated assets and a leverage ratio of at least 9.0%, and meet certain other asset-related requirements. If the election is made, the institution would be considered to have satisfied the capital requirements of Basel III adopted by the federal banking regulators, and would be able to satisfy the regulatory capital requirements by calculating and reporting a single leverage ratio, reducing the time associated with risk-weighting assets for capital ratio reporting purposes. An eligible institution may opt in to the CBLR framework in connection with any regulatory financial report, and may opt out of the CBLR framework at any time by completing the Basel III capital ratio calculations in connection with any regulatory financial report. The rule establishes a two-quarter grace period for institutions whose leverage ratio falls below 9.0% but remains above 8.0%. The Liquidity Standard includes: (1) a liquidity coverage ratio to ensure that sufficient high quality liquid resources



are availableCompany and the Bank have not opted in case of a liquidity crisis; (2) a net stable funding ratio to promote liquidity resiliency over longer time horizons by creating incentives for banks to fund their activities with stable sources of funding on an ongoing basis; and (3) additional liquidity monitoring metrics focused on maturity mismatch, concentration of funding and available unencumbered assets. The Liquidity Standard would be phased-in through 2019. On September 3, 2014, the U.S. banking agencies issued a final liquidity rule that establishes for the first time a standardized minimum liquidity requirement. The final rule applies to large and internationally active banking organizations and is not applicable to the Bank. The U.S. banking agencies have not adopted or proposed rules to implement a quantitative liquidity requirement for banks such as the Bank with less than $50 billion in total assets, and it is uncertain whether such a requirement will be established.
CBLR framework.

Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank to a variety of enforcement remedies, including issuance of a capital directive, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, ineligibility for expedited treatment of regulatory applications, restrictions on certain acquisitions, a prohibition on accepting brokered deposits and certain other restrictions on its business. As described below, the FDIC can impose substantial additional restrictions upon FDIC-insured depository institutionsAn institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that failis lower than is indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined to meet applicable capital requirements as set forth above.

be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters. 

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDI Act”) requires the federal regulatory agencies to take “prompt corrective action” if a depository institution does not meet minimum capital requirements as set forth above. Generally, a receiver or conservator for a bank that is “critically undercapitalized” must be appointed within specific time frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed within 45 days of the date a bank is deemed to have received notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Any holding company for a bank required to submit a capital restoration plan must guarantee the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5% of the bank’s assets at the time it was notified or deemed to be undercapitalized by regulator, or (ii) the amount necessary to restore the bank to adequately capitalized status. This guarantee remains in place until the bank is notified that it has maintained adequately capitalized status for specified time periods. Additional measures with respect to undercapitalized institutions include a prohibition on capital distributions, growth limits and restrictions on activities.

An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than is indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters. As

9

The FDI Act generally prohibits an FDIC-insured bank from making a capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its holding company if the bank would thereafter be “undercapitalized.” “Undercapitalized” banks are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. The federal regulators may not accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the bank’s capital. In addition, for a capital restoration plan to be acceptable to regulators, the bank’s parent holding company must guarantee that the institution will comply with such capital restoration plan. The aggregate liability of the parent holding company is limited to the lesser of: (i) an amount equal to 5% of the bank’s total assets at the time it became “undercapitalized”; and (ii) the amount which is necessary (or would have been necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all capital standards applicable with respect to such institution as of the time it fails to comply with the plan. If a bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.”

“Significantly undercapitalized” insured banks may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become “adequately capitalized,” requirements to reduce total assets and the cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator. A bank that is not “well capitalized” is also subject to certain limitations relating to brokered deposits.

As of December 31, 2019, the Bank had capital levels that qualify as “well capitalized” and that meet the “capital conservation buffer” requirements under applicable regulations.

For further detail on capital and capital ratios, see the discussion under “Management’s“Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section, “Liquidity – Liquidity and Capital Resources,” contained in Item 7.

Resources” and Note 17 – Regulatory Matters, to the consolidated financial statements. 

FDIC Insurance Assessments

The FDIC, through the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”), insures the deposits of the Bank up to prescribed limits for each depositor (currently, $250,000 per depositor). The assessment paid by each DIF member institution is based on its relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other factors. Specifically, the assessment rate is based on the institution’s capitalization risk category and supervisory subgroup category. The deposit insurance assessment is calculated on the average total consolidated assets of insured depository institutions during the assessment period, less the average tangible equity of the institution during the assessment period as opposed to solely bank deposits at an institution. An institution’s capitalization risk category is based on the FDIC’s determination of whether the institution is well capitalized, adequately capitalized or less than adequately capitalized. The Bank’s insurance assessments during 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016were $275,000, $745,000, and 2015 were $966,000, $1.6 million and $789,000, respectively.



Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

The FDIC also collects a deposit-based assessment from insured financial institutions on behalf of the Financing Corporation (the “FICO”). The funds from these assessments are used to service debt issued by FICO in its capacity as a financing vehicle for the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation, which formerly insured savings and loan associations. These assessments will continue until the debt matures in 2018 and 2019.

Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions

The Company is a legal entity that is separate and distinct from the Bank. While there are various legal and regulatory limitations under federal and state law governing the extent to which banks can pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to holding companies, the principal source of cash revenues for the Company are dividends from the Bank. The relevant federal regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit a national bank or bank holding company from engaging in conduct that, in the opinion of such regulatory agency, constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business. The payment of dividends could, depending upon the financial condition of a bank, be deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business.

10

Insured depository institutions, such as the Bank, are prohibited from making capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become “undercapitalized” (as such term is defined in the applicable law and regulations). In addition, capital rules limit capital distributions, including dividends, if the depository institution does not have a “capital conservation buffer.” See further details above under “Capital“—Capital Adequacy.”

National banks are required by federal law to obtain the prior approval of the OCC in order to declare and pay dividends if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year would exceed the total of (1) such bank’s net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for that year plus (2) its retained net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for the preceding two calendar years, less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, these banks may only pay dividends to the extent that retained net profits (including the portion transferred to surplus) exceed bad debts (as defined by regulation).

The Federal Reserve has issued a policy statement that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the holding company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earning retention that is consistent with the holding company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a holding company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, under the prompt corrective action regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if one or more of the holding company’s bank subsidiaries are classified as undercapitalized.

Stock Repurchases

A bank holding company is required to give the Federal Reserve prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of its consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve order or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve. In addition, the Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies should review their dividend policies, and has discouraged dividend payment ratios that are at maximum allowable levels unless both asset quality and capital levels are strong.

Transactions with Affiliates

Federal laws strictly limit the ability of banks to engage in transactions with their affiliates, including their bank holding companies. Regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve limit the types and amounts of these transactions (including extensions of credit to affiliates, investment in affiliates, the purchase of assets from their bank subsidiaries)affiliates, and lending that results in credit exposure to affiliates) that may take place and generally require those transactions to be on an arm’s‑lengtharm’s-length basis. In general, these regulations require that any “covered transactions” between a subsidiary bank and its parent company or the nonbank subsidiaries of the bank holding company be limited to 10% of the bank subsidiary’s capital and surplus and, with respect to such parent company and all such nonbank subsidiaries, to an aggregate of 20% of the bank subsidiary’s capital and surplus. Further, loans and extensions of credit to affiliates generally are required to be secured by eligible collateral in specified amounts.





Interstate Banking and Branching

The Dodd-Frank Act relaxed previous restrictions on interstate branching and national banks and state banks are able to establish branches in any state if that state would permit the establishment of the branch by a state bank chartered in that state. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”), requires that the OCC review (1) any merger with an insured bank into a national bank, or (2) any establishment of branches by an insured bank.  See “-Bank“—Bank Merger Act.”

11

Loans to Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Shareholders

The authority of the Bank to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and principal shareholders, including their immediate family members, corporations and other entities that they control, is subject to substantial restrictions and requirements under the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O promulgated thereunder, as well as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These statutes and regulations impose specific limits on the amount of loans that the Bank may make to directors and other insiders, and specified approval procedures must be followed in making loans that exceed certain amounts. In addition, all loans the Bank makes to directors and other insiders must satisfy the following requirements:

·

the loans must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not affiliated with the Bank;

the loans must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for

·

the Bank must follow credit underwriting procedures at least as stringent as those applicable to comparable transactions with persons who are not affiliated with the Bank; and

the Bank must follow credit underwriting procedures at least as stringent as those applicable to comparable transactions with persons who are not affiliated with the Bank; and

·

the loans must not involve a greater than normal risk of non-payment or include other features not favorable to the Bank.

the loans must not involve a greater than normal risk of non-payment or include other features not favorable to the Bank.

Furthermore, the Bank must periodically report all loans made to directors and other insiders to the bank regulators, and these loans are closely scrutinized by the regulators for compliance with Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O. Each loan to directorsa director or other insidersinsider must be pre-approved by the Bank’s board of directors with the interested director abstaining from voting.

Limitations on Incentive Compensation
In June 2010, the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The guidance, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors.
The Federal Reserve Board reviews, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as the Company, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews will be tailored to each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives are included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies.
In addition, Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act required certain regulators (including the OCC, Securities and Exchange Commission and Federal Reserve Board) to adopt requirements or guidelines prohibiting excess compensation. On April 14, 2011, these regulators published a joint proposed rulemaking to implement Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act for depository institutions, their holding companies and various other financial institutions with $1 billion or more in assets. The proposed rules were re-proposed in May 2016 and final rules have not been issued to date. The proposed rule would (i) prohibit incentive-based compensation arrangements for covered persons that would encourage inappropriate risks by providing excess compensation; (ii) prohibit incentive-based compensation arrangements for covered persons that would expose the institution to inappropriate risks by providing compensation that could lead to a material financial loss; (iii) require policies and procedures for incentive-based compensation arrangements that are commensurate with the size and complexity of the institution; (iv) require incentive-based compensation arrangements that appropriately balance risk and reward, including deferral, forfeiture, downward adjustment, and


clawbacks in certain circumstances; and (v) retain records documenting the structure of incentive based compensation arrangements and demonstrating compliance with the proposed rule.
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation at least every three years and on so-called “golden parachute” payments in connections with approvals of mergers and acquisitions unless previously voted on by shareholders. The legislation also authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The Dodd-Frank act gives the Securities and Exchange Commission authority to prohibit broker discretionary voting on elections of directors and executive compensation matters.

Community Reinvestment Act

The CRA requires the federal bank regulatory agencies to encourage financial institutions to meet the credit needs of low and moderate-income borrowers in their local communities.areas. An institution’s size and business strategy determines the type of examination that it will receive. Large, retail-oriented institutions are examined using a performance-based lending, investment and service test. Small institutions are examined using a streamlined approach. All institutions may opt to be evaluated under a strategic plan formulated with community input and pre‑approvedpre-approved by the bank regulatory agency.

The CRA regulations provide for certain disclosure obligations. Each institution must post a notice advising the public of its right to comment to the institution and its regulator on the institution’s CRA performance and to review the institution’s CRA public file. Each lending institution must maintain for public inspection a file that includes a listing of branch locations and services, a summary of lending activity, a map of its communities and any written comments from the public on its performance in meeting community credit needs. The CRA requires public disclosure of a financial institution’s written CRA evaluations. This requirement promotes enforcement of CRA principles by providing the public with the status of a particular institution’s community reinvestment record.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act made various changes to the CRA. Among other changes, CRA agreements with private parties must be disclosed. A bank holding company will not be permitted to become a financial holding company and no new activities authorized under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act may be commenced by a holding company or by a bank financial subsidiary if any of its bank subsidiaries received less than a satisfactory CRA rating in its latest examination. TheIn its last CRA examination, the Bank received a “Satisfactory” rating in its last CRA examination which was conducted on October 3, 2016.

rating.

Consumer Laws and Regulations

The Bank is also subject to certain consumer laws and regulations that are designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. While the following list is not exhaustive, these laws and regulations include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Fair Housing Act, among others. These laws and regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, gender or other designated characteristics and mandate various disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits or making loans to such customers. These and other laws also limit finance charges or other fees or charges earned in the Bank’s activities.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

12

The

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act created a new, independent federal agency called the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which is grantedhas broad rulemaking supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth in Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Act, the Consumer Financial Privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and certain other statutes. The CFPB has examination and primary enforcement authority, with respect to depository institutions with $10 billiona wide range of consumer financial laws, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive, or more in assets. Smaller institutions are subject to rules promulgated by the CFPB but continue to be examinedabusive” acts and supervised by federal banking regulators for consumer compliance purposes.practices. The CFPB has the authority to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practices in connection with the offeringinvestigate potential violations of consumer financial products. The Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws, issue cease-and-desist orders, and standards that are more stringent than those adopted at the federal level and,institute civil proceedings in certain circumstances, permits the state attorney generalorder to enforce compliance with both the state and federal laws and regulations.

The CFPB has adopted regulations addressing a variety of mortgage-related topics required under the Dodd-Frank Act, including mortgage origination disclosures, minimum underwriting standards and ability to repay, high-cost mortgage lending, debt collection and servicing practices, as well as consumer lending topics.


A final rule integrating mortgage loan disclosures required by the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act (“RESPA”) became effective during October 2015. The final rule consolidated four existing and separate disclosures required under TILA and RESPA for closed-end credit transactions secured by real property into two forms with a view towards making the mortgage loan disclosures less confusing and more consumer friendly. The CFPB continues to enact regulations applicable to various aspects of our business, as well as to review and adopt amendments to previous rules.
impose civil money penalties or injunctions.

Technology Risk Management and Consumer Privacy

Banks are generally expected to prudently manage technology-related risks as part of their comprehensive risk management policies by identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling risks associated with the use of technology. Under Section 501 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the federal banking agencies have established appropriate standards for financial institutions regarding the implementation of safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information, protection against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records and protection against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information in a way that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to a customer. Among other matters, the rules require each bank to implement a comprehensive written information security program that includes administrative, technical and physical safeguards relating to customer information.

information, as well as processes to enable recovery of data and business operations, rebuild network capabilities and restore data.

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a financial institution must also provide its customers with a notice of privacy policies and practices and may not disclose nonpublic personal information about a customer to nonaffiliated third parties unless the institution satisfies various notice and opt-out requirements and the customer has not elected to opt out of the disclosure. All banks are also required to develop initial and annual privacy notices which describe in general terms the bank’s information sharing practices. Banks that share nonpublic personal information about customers with nonaffiliated third parties must also provide customers with an opt-out notice and a reasonable period of time for the customer to opt out of any such disclosure (with certain exceptions). Limitations are placed on the extent to which a bank can disclose an account number or access code for credit card, deposit or transaction accounts to any nonaffiliated third party for use in marketing.

UDAP and UDAAP

Recently, banking regulatory agencies have increasingly used a general consumer protection statute to address “unethical” or otherwise “bad” business practices that may not necessarily fall directly under the purview of a specific banking or consumer finance law. The law of choice for enforcement against such business practices has been Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to as the FTC Act, which is the primary federal law that prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices, referred to as UDAP, and unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce. “Unjustified consumer injury” is the principal focus of the FTC Act. Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, there was little formal guidance to provide insight to the parameters for compliance with UDAP laws and regulations. However, UDAP laws and regulations have been expanded under the Dodd-Frank Act to apply to “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices,” referred to as UDAAP, which have been delegated to the CFPB for supervision.

MonitoringUDAAP.

Anti-Terrorism and Anti-Money Laundering Reporting Suspicious Activity

Under the Bank Secrecy Act (the “BSA”), financial institutions are required to monitor and report unusual or suspicious account activity that might signify money laundering, tax evasion or other criminal activities, as well as transactions involving the transfer or withdrawal of amounts in excess of prescribed limits. The BSA is sometimes referred to as an “anti-money laundering” (“AML”) law. Several AML statutes, including provisions in Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, have been enacted to amend the BSA. Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and “know your customer” standards in their dealings with financial institutions and foreign customers. Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are also required to establish anti-money laundering programs. The USA PATRIOT Act sets forth minimum standards for these programs, including:

·

the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls;

the development

·

the collection of information regarding, and the verification of the identity of, customers opening new accounts;

13

the designation of a compliance officer;

·

ongoing customer due diligence;

an ongoing employee training program; and

·

the designation of a compliance officer;

an independent audit function to test the programs.

·

an ongoing employee training program; and

·

an independent audit function to test the programs.

In addition, under the USA PATRIOT Act, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, (the “Treasury”), has adopted rules addressing a number of related issues, including increasing the cooperation and information sharing between financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement authorities regarding individuals, entities and organizations engaged in, or reasonably suspected based on credible evidence of engaging in, terrorist acts or money laundering activities. Any financial institution complying with these rules will not be deemed to violate the privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that are discussed



below. Finally, under the regulations of the Office of Foreign Asset Control (the “OFAC”(“OFAC”), we are required to monitor and block transactions with certain “specially designated nationals” who OFAC has determined pose a risk to U.S. national security.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act mandates for public companies, such as the Company, a variety of reforms intended to address corporate and accounting fraud and provides for the establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), which enforces auditing, quality control and independence standards for firms that audit SEC-reporting companies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act imposes higher standards for auditor independence and restricts the provision of consulting services by auditing firms to companies they audit and requires that certain audit partners be rotated periodically. The law also requires chief executive officers and chief financial officers, or their equivalents, to certify the accuracy of periodic reports filed with the SEC, subject to civil and criminal penalties if they knowingly or willfully violate this certification requirement, and increases the oversight and authority of audit committees of publicly traded companies.

companies, and requires enhanced disclosure related to internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.

Annual Disclosure Statement

This Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K also serves as the annual disclosure statement of Atlantic Capital pursuant to Part 350 of the FDIC’s rules and regulations. This statement has not been reviewed or confirmed for accuracy or relevance by the FDIC.

14

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to the Company and its Banking Operations

Our strategic realignment may not have the anticipated results, exposes us to additional operational risks, and may be negatively perceived in the markets.

We have recently implemented a strategic realignment, including the Branch Sale, the exit of the Tennessee and northwest Georgia markets, the exit of the mortgage banking and trust and wealth management businesses, and the addition of branches and loan production offices in Atlanta and the surrounding areas. We may experience increased delinquencies and credit losses, which could have a material adverse effectnot fully realize the anticipated benefits of our strategic realignment if the negative impacts on our capital, financial conditionbusiness, including the loss of deposits as a source of funding, the loss of customers and resultsrevenue from the affected branches and the lines of operations.

Like other lenders,business we facehave decided to exit, and the risk thatimpact of geographic and customer concentration, outweigh the anticipated benefits. In addition, our customers will not repay their loans. A customer’s failure to repay us is usually preceded by missed monthly payments. In some instances, however, a customer may declare bankruptcy prior to missing payments, and, following a borrower filing bankruptcy, a lender’s recovery of the credit extended is often limited. Since our loans are secured by collateral, we may attempt to seize the collateral when and if customers default on their loans. However, the value of the collateral may not equal the amount of the unpaid loan, and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the remaining balance from our customers. Elevated levels of delinquencies and bankruptcies in our market area generally and among our customers specifically can be precursors of future charge-offs and may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses. Higher charge-off rates and an increase in our allowance for loan losses may hurt our overall financial performance if we are unable to increase revenue to compensate for these losses and may also increase our cost of funds.
Our allowance for loan lossesstrategic realignment may not be adequate to cover actual losses,viewed positively by shareholders and we may be required to materially increase our allowance,analysts, which may adversely affectcause our capital, financial conditionstock price to decline or become volatile.

We are subject to risks associated with geographic and results ofcustomer concentration in our lending operations,.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expenses that represents management’s best estimate of probable credit losses that have been incurred withincould negatively impact our asset quality.

Following the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance for loan losses and our methodology for calculating the allowance are fully described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 under “Allowance for Loan Losses,” and in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies-Allowance for Loan Losses” section. In general, an increase in the allowance for loan losses results in a decrease in net income, and possibly risk-based capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.

The allowance, in the judgment of management, is established to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The determinationcompletion of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses involvesBranch Sale, a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks using existing qualitative and quantitative information, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans, and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of additional loan charge-offs, based on judgments that are different than those of management. As we are consistently adjustingmajority our loan portfolio and underwriting standards to reflect current market conditions, we can provide no assurance that our methodology will not change, which could result in a charge to earnings.
We continually reassess the creditworthiness of ourinvolves borrowers and the sufficiency of our allowance for loan losses as part of the Bank’s credit functions. Any significant amount of additional non-performing assets, loan charge-offs, increasesor collateral located in the provision


for loan losses orAtlanta metropolitan area, and our business strategy is to continue to focus on commercial customers located in the continuationAtlanta metropolitan area. Our relatively small geographic footprint limits our ability to diversify macro-economic risk, so we are less able to spread the risk of aggressive charge-off policies or any inability by us to realize the full value of underlying collateralunfavorable local economic conditions than larger financial institutions. Accordingly, in the event of adverse changes affecting the Atlanta market generally, or affecting Atlanta to a greater degree than a broader regional or national market as a whole, we will be exposed to risks related to increases in loan default, will negatively affect our business, financial condition,delinquencies among Atlanta-based borrowers, increases in problem assets and results of operations and the price of our securities. Our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover future credit losses.
An economic downturnforeclosures, decreases in the housing market, the homebuilding industry, and/or in our markets generally could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Our long-term success depends upon the growth in population, income levels, deposits and housing starts in our primary market areas-Metropolitan Atlanta and the Interstate 75 corridor between Dalton, Georgia (approximately one hour north of Atlanta) and Jefferson City, Tennessee (approximately 30 minutes north of Knoxville, Tennessee). If the communities in which the Bank operates do not grow, or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally are unfavorable, our business may not succeed. An economic recession over a prolonged period or other economic problems in our market areas could have a material adverse impact on the quality of the loan portfolio and the demand for our products and services. Future adverseservices, decreases in the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate, located in Atlanta, and related decreases in customers’ borrowing power. In addition, because of our lending focus, we may be dependent on a smaller number of larger loan relationships, in which case our credit quality would be disproportionately impacted by deterioration of one or more large individual credit exposures. Adverse changes in the economiesAtlanta market or impacting large loan relationships could require us to record increased allowance for loan losses, restructure loans or foreclose on and sell collateral. Even an increased allowance may be inadequate to cover loan losses, the terms of restructured loans may contain terms less favorable to us, borrowers under restructured loans may continue to be delinquent, and we may not be able to sell foreclosed collateral on favorable terms, any of which would cause us to suffer credit losses. In addition, a significant increase in classified assets or credit losses could result in our market areas mayregulators imposing restrictions on our operations, which could limit our ability to execute our business strategy. Any of these occurrences would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations or cash flows. Further,operations.    

We are subject to risks associated with customer concentration in our deposit base, which could negatively impact our liquidity.

We transferred approximately $598 million of deposits in connection with the banking industry in TennesseeBranch Sale, which decreased our liquidity available for making loans. Because the transferred deposits were comprised primarily of a large number of smaller deposits, we are more reliant on a smaller number of large deposit customers for liquidity funding. Our strategy involves continued solicitation of and Georgia is affected by general economic conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment and other factors beyondreliance on larger deposits from our control.

Previously, the homebuilding and residential mortgage industry experiencedbusiness customers. Accordingly, a significant deterioration of financial condition of relatively few of our depositors could cause those depositors to maintain lower balances, which would have an adverse impact on the Bank’s liquidity and sustained declineprofitability. As a result, we may be required to raise interest rates on deposits in demand for new homesan effort to attract deposits and a decrease in the absorption of new and existing homes available for sale in various markets. A recurrencethus incur increased interest expense, or to seek liquidity funding from borrowings or other sources on terms less favorable than current deposit rates. Any of these trendsoccurrences could cause us to face increased delinquencies and non-performing assets as these builders and developers are forced to default on their loans with us. If market conditions deteriorate, our non-performing assets may increase and we may need to take valuation adjustmentshave a material adverse impact on our loan portfoliosoperating results and financial condition.

15

A key focus of our strategy is originating commercial real estate owned.

We make and hold in our portfolio a number of commercial and industrial commercial real estate, land acquisition and development, and construction loans. We intend to continue originatingBecause our loan portfolio consists largely of these types of loans, our portfolio carries a higher degree of risk than would a portfolio with larger amounts of other types of loans. These loans involve credit risks that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We offer commercial and industrialreal estate and commercial real estateand industrial loans, and as of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $1.56 billion in such$916.3 million of commercial real estate loans and $705.1 million of commercial and industrial loans outstanding, representing 493%49% and 38%, respectively, of our total loan portfolio. These types of loans have historically driven the Bank’s total risk-based capital.  Commercialgrowth in our loan portfolio and industrial andwe intend to continue our lending efforts for commercial real estate and commercial and industrial products.

Commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans may present a greater risk of non‑paymentnon-payment by a borrower than other types of loans. They typically involve larger loan balances and are particularly sensitive to economic conditions.  Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrowers’ ability to make repayment from their employment and other income and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial loans typically are made on the basis of the borrowers’ ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the related commercial venture. If the cash flow from business operations is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Due to the larger average size of a commercial loan in comparison to other loans such as residential loans, as well as the collateral which is generally less readily-marketable, losses incurred on a small number of commercial loans could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, commercial loan customers often have the ability to fund current interest payments through additional borrowings, and as a result the actual credit risk associated with these customers may be worse than anticipated. In addition, some of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us, which means that an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to significantly greater risk of loss. In the case of commercial and industrial loans, collateral often consists of accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, which may not yield substantial recovery of principal losses incurred, and is susceptible to deterioration or other loss in advance of liquidation of such collateral. These typesloans may lack standardized terms and may include a balloon payment feature. The ability of loans, however, have historically drivena borrower to make or refinance a balloon payment may be affected by a number of factors, including the growth in our loan portfoliofinancial condition of the borrower, prevailing economic conditions and we intend to continue our lending efforts for commercial and industrial products.

prevailing interest rates.

We offer land acquisition and development and construction loans for builders and developers, and as of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $115$127.5 million in such loans outstanding, representing 37%7% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital.loans outstanding. Similar to commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans, land acquisition and development and construction loans are more riskyriskier than other types of loans. The primary credit risks associated with land acquisition and development and construction lending are underwriting and project risks. Project risks include cost overruns, borrower credit risk, project completion risk, general contractor credit risk, and environmental and other hazard risks. Market risks are risks associated with therental or sale of the completed residential units.projects. They include affordability risk, which means the risk that borrowers cannot obtain affordable financing or that renters cannot afford rents at the projects, product design risk, and risks posed by competing projects.

Because of the risks associated with commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and acquisition and development and construction loans, we may experience higher rates of default than a portfolio more heavily weighted towards smaller or residential mortgage loans. Losses in our commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, land acquisition and development, or construction and land loan portfolio could exceed our reserves, which would adversely impact our capital and earnings.  Non-performing

16

Lending to small businesses, franchisees and high-growth businesses may expose us to additional risks not present in lending to larger business customers.

We focus on lending to small businesses, including franchise businesses and customers in certain high-growth industries.  Small business customers generally have fewer financial resources and are more vulnerable to declines in economic conditions than larger, better capitalized businesses with longer operating histories. Businesses in high-growth industries such as financial technology require ongoing capital to support their growth, invest in product development, and attract and retain highly skilled employees. These businesses may not generate income sufficient to provide that capital, and may not be able to raise required levels of capital, which may result in them increasing debt financing. Franchisee borrowers may incur greater costs than other small businesses as a result of complying with operational or other requirements imposed by franchisors, and may not have the ability to respond to local market forces to the same extent as independently operated small businesses or larger businesses. Franchisees in the retail industry are susceptible to changes in labor costs and generally do not have significant amounts of collateral to secure loans. In addition, the success of franchise businesses is highly dependent on the reputation of the franchisor compared to the franchisor’s competitors. Franchisors may not provide financial support to franchisees, so franchise businesses may be more susceptible to downturns in the local or national economy than larger businesses supported by a parent organization. Conversely, where franchisors do provide financial support, events negatively impacting the franchisor globally or nationally will impact otherwise successful individual franchisees. In addition, franchisors may grant a number of franchise licenses that exceeds market demand for their products or services in a particular geographic area, and may revoke franchise license of franchisees for poor performance or other reasons. The occurrence of any of these or other events impacting our franchise and high-growth business customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

SBA lending is an important part of our business. Our SBA lending program is dependent on the federal government and our status as an SBA Preferred Lender, and we face risks associated with originating and selling SBA loans.

Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the policies and oversight of the U.S. federal government. As an approved participant in the SBA Preferred Lender’s Program (an “SBA Preferred Lender”), we enable our clients to obtain SBA loans more efficiently. The SBA periodically reviews our lending operations to assess, among other things, whether we comply with program rules and whether we exhibit prudent risk management. If the SBA were to identify weakness in our procedures or our risk management policies, the SBA may request corrective actions or impose enforcement actions, including revocation of our SBA Preferred Lender status. In addition, the federal government may make changes to the SBA program, including but not limited to changes to the level of guarantee provided by the federal government on SBA loans, changes to program specific rules impacting eligibility under the guarantee program, limits on fees lenders may impose, and changes to the program amounts authorized by Congress or funding for the SBA program. In addition, any default by the federal government on its obligations or any prolonged government shutdown could impede our ability to originate SBA loans, sell such loans in any onethe secondary market, or collect under SBA loan guarantees. We cannot predict the effects of these categories could increase during 2018,changes on our business and these non-performingprofitability.

We generally sell the guaranteed portion of loans couldthat we originate under the SBA’s 7(a) Loan Program in the secondary market and retain the servicing rights to the loans that we sell. These sales result in premium income for us at the time of sale and create a material levelstream of charge-offs, either individually or collectively, which would negatively impact our capital and earnings.



We have significantly increasedfuture servicing income. For any of the percentage of commercial and industrial loans in our loan portfolio and intendreasons noted above, we may be unable to continue originating these typesloans or selling them in the secondary market, and premiums may decline due to economic and competitive factors. In addition, we incur credit risk on the non-guaranteed portion of loans.  Asthese loans, and if a customer defaults on a loan, we share any loss and recovery related to the loan pro-rata with the SBA. If the SBA establishes that a loss on an SBA guaranteed loan is attributable to significant technical deficiencies in the manner in which we originated, funded or serviced the loan, the SBA may seek recovery of the principal loss related to the deficiency from us. Because we do not maintain reserves or loss allowances for such potential claims by the SBA, claims of this sort could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

17

Our growing deposit and processing focused business may expose us to additional risks not associated with the provision of core banking products and services.

One of our areas of strategic focus is investing in the growth of our deposit and processing focused business, particularly financial technology, payment processing and treasury management services. Because some of our products and services are delivered to customers through selective partnerships with financial technology companies, developments that negatively impact our partners will indirectly impact us. These industries are subject to rapid technological advancements, including the development of enhanced products and services by our competitors, which include both established financial institutions and newer specialized service providers; internalization of certain functions by our customers; and the development of industry-wide solutions and standards, which may render any product or service obsolete and which will require us and our partners to continually refine our product and services offerings. The competitive landscape for our customers and partners in these industries changes rapidly due to consolidation and changes in relationships between companies providing complimentary services. Moreover, the needs and preferences of our customers will change as their businesses evolve and as they adopt new and more varied technology for business uses. We are committed to growing this aspect of our business; however, unforeseen increases in transaction volume resulting from industry consolidation, changes in the competitive landscape for our customers and other changes in our customers’ businesses could result in growth that we are unable to manage effectively. In addition, the regulations and standards applicable to these industries are evolving, and new regulations or standards may negatively impact the efficiency or utility of the products and services we offer, or require us to invest additional resources to adapt our products and services to be compliant with those regulations and standards. In particular, customers in certain industries, such as payment processing, pose heightened compliance risks with respect to anti-money laundering and similar regulations and regulations related to information security. The failure by us or our partners to anticipate or respond to changes in these industries, comply with applicable regulations, or protect customer information could result in our customers responding negatively to the products and services that we offer, reputational damage, loss of competitive advantages, increased expenses associated with lawsuits and remediation efforts, or the imposition by our regulators of fines or restrictions on our ability to conduct these businesses, any of which would have concentrated credit exposurea material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Future strategic initiatives may not be implemented successfully. We may not realize the benefits of our strategic initiatives in commercialthe anticipated timeline or at all, and industrial loansthe implementation of our strategy may result in costs or loss of revenue that could adversely affectimpact our results of operations.

Implementation of our strategy may involve organic growth initiatives, hiring individual bankers or groups of bankers, developing new product lines, engaging in marketing initiatives, acquiring other financial institutions, or expanding our branch network. Strategic transactions and other initiatives involve additional expense and also put a strain on our management, financial, operational and technical resources. In addition, strategic initiatives involve a number of risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations,. including:

·

there may be a substantial lag time between the time we incur the expenses associated with implementing strategic initiatives and the time when we realize the anticipated benefits of the initiative;

As

·

expenses and diversion of management’s attention in connection with product development, evaluation, market studies and roll-out;

·

new products or services that are ultimately not utilized by customers, or do not attract other business from customers utilizing them, may not be profitable;

·

declines in the business conditions impacting clients in industries that are targets of strategic initiatives;

·

the use of inaccurate estimates and judgments in evaluating credit, operations, management and market risks with respect to any target institution or assets;

·

the diligence we conduct with respect to any expansion opportunity may not be sufficient to properly evaluate the prospects and risks of any such opportunity;

·

diluting our existing shareholders in an acquisition;

·

the time associated with negotiating a transaction or working on strategic plans, resulting in management’s attention being diverted from our existing business;

·

the time and expense of obtaining required regulatory approvals for any transaction and complying with the terms and conditions of regulatory approvals, which may require us to dispose of acquired branches, sell certain segments of acquired loan portfolios, or impose other restrictions on our operations;

18

·

negotiations for any transaction generally may be terminated by either party for a variety of reasons resulting in sunk costs associated with the particular transaction;

·

the time and expense of integrating new operations and personnel resulting from any transaction or branch expansion opportunity;

·

our lack of market expertise in new geographic markets that we may enter could negatively impact our ability to successfully grow our operations there, or cause us to incur unforeseen expenses in the growth of our operations;

·

the possible loss of key employees and customers of an acquired institution as a result of expansion into a new market, elimination or consolidation of branches, or an acquisition that is poorly conceived and executed;

·

our asset quality could decline if we are not able to attract quality loan customers in new markets or if high-quality customers are lost in connection with a market exit;

·

the loss of customer deposits in connection with a branch closure, sale or consolidation eliminates a relatively inexpensive source of funding that we may not be able to replace without incurring additional expense;

·

the loss of loan customers in connection with a branch closure, sale or consolidation could result in a decrease in interest income that we may not be able to replace;

·

the elimination of a line of business could result in a greater than anticipated losses of customers, including customers who turn to one of our competitors to replace the products or services we no longer offer as well as traditional banking services; and

·

reputational damage associated with strategic initiatives, particularly closing or selling branches or exiting lines of business.

We may be affected by a numberunable to successfully implement our strategic plan or meet our goals. The occurrence of factors, including the financial conditionany of the borrower, prevailing economic conditions and prevailing interest rates. Repayment of these loans is generally more dependent on the economy and the successful operation of a business. Because of theforegoing risks, associated with commercial loans, we may experience higher rates of default than if the portfolio were more heavily weighted toward residential mortgage loans. Higher rates of defaultor other risks not mentioned above, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. 

Our credit risk and credit losses can increase if our loans or investments are concentrated among borrowers engaged in the same or similar activities, industries, geographies, or to borrowers or issuers who, as a group, may be uniquely or disproportionately affected by economic or market conditions. The deterioration of an individually large exposure, for example due to a natural disaster, act of terrorism, severe weather event, or economic event, could lead to additional loan loss provisions and/or charge-offs, or credit impairment of our investments, and subsequently have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory changes related to widely used reference interest rates could adversely affect our revenue, expenses, the value of our loans and other financial instruments, and our interest rate risk.

The London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and certain other “benchmarks” are the subject of recent national, international, and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past or have other consequences which cannot be predicted. Although alternative reference rates have been proposed, the scope of acceptance of any such reference rate and the impact on calculated rates, pricing and the ability to manage risk, including through derivatives, remain uncertain. We have a significant number of floating rate obligations, loans, deposits, derivatives and other financial instruments that are directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. If LIBOR ceases to exist, if the methods of calculating LIBOR change from current methods or if we are required to utilize alternative reference rates, interest rates on, and revenue and expenses associated with, those financial instruments may be adversely affected. Additionally, timing differences and different definitions of any new benchmark could create mismatches which would negatively impact interest income, interest rate risk management, liquidity. Our management of the transition from LIBOR may prompt changes in accounting treatment, risk and pricing models, valuation tools, hedging strategy and product design and offerings, all of which could cause us to incur significant expense. Reliance on “fallback” provisions also could result in customer uncertainty and disputes regarding how variable rates should be calculated, and negotiations with customers and counterparties regarding the calculation of interest will cause us to incur significant expense. If we are unable to successfully negotiate calculations, amend loans on terms that are satisfactory to our customers, or are unable to adequately hedge risks related to certain customers, we could experience a loss of customers and reputational damage. Any of these risks, and our failure to adequately manage the transition from LIBOR generally, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

19

An economic downturn in the commercial loan market, the commercial real estate industry, and/or in our markets generally could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

If the communities in which the Bank operates do not grow, or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally are unfavorable, our business may not succeed. An economic recession over a prolonged period or other economic problems in our market areas could have a material adverse impact on the quality of the loan portfolio and the demand for our products and services. Future adverse changes in the economies in our market areas may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Further, the banking industry is affected by general economic conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment and other factors beyond our control. If market conditions deteriorate, our non-performing assets may increase and we may need to take valuation adjustments on our loan portfolios and real estate owned.

We may experience increased delinquencies and credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.

Like other lenders, we face the risk that our customers will not repay their loans in full. A customer’s failure to repay us is usually preceded by missed monthly payments. In some instances, however, a customer may declare bankruptcy prior to missing payments, and, following a borrower filing bankruptcy, a lender’s recovery of the credit extended is often limited. Since many of our loans are secured by collateral, we may attempt to seize the collateral when and if customers default on their loans. However, the value of the collateral may not equal the amount of the unpaid loan, and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the remaining balance from our customers. Elevated levels of delinquencies and bankruptcies in our market area generally and among our customers specifically can be precursors of future charge-offs and may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses. Higher charge-off rates and an increase in our allowance for loan losses may hurt our overall financial performance if we are unable to increase revenue to compensate for these losses.

Our allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses, and we may be required to materially increase our allowance, which may adversely affect our capital, financial condition and results of operations.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expenses that represents management’s best estimate of probable credit losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance for loan losses and our methodology for calculating the allowance are fully described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 under “Allowance for Loan Losses,” and in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies-Allowance for Loan Losses” section. In general, an increase in the allowance for loan losses results in a decrease in net income, and possibly risk-based capital, and may have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations.

The allowance, in the judgment of management, is established to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks using existing qualitative and quantitative information, all of which may undergo material changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans, and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for loan losses. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of additional loan charge-offs, based on judgments that are different than those of management. As we are continually adjusting our loan portfolio and underwriting standards to reflect current market conditions, we can provide no assurance that our methodology will not change, which could result in a charge to earnings.

We continually reassess the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the sufficiency of our allowance for loan losses as part of the Bank’s credit functions. Any significant amount of additional non-performing assets, loan charge-offs, increases in the provision for loan losses or any inability by us to realize the full value of underlying collateral in the event of a loan default, will negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover future credit losses.

20

Changes in our accounting policies or in accounting standards could materially affect how we report our financial results and condition.

From time to time, the FASB and SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be difficult to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. For example, FASB’s CECL accounting standard became effective on January 1, 2020 and substantially changed the accounting for credit losses on loans and other financial assets held by banks, financial institutions and other organizations. The standard removes the existing “probable” threshold in GAAP for recognizing credit losses and instead requires companies to reflect their estimate of credit losses over the life of the financial assets. Companies must consider all relevant information when estimating expected credit losses, including details about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

The adoption of CECL may also impact our ongoing earnings, perhaps materially, due in part to changes in loan portfolio composition, changes in credit metrics, and changes in the macroeconomic forecast. Our ability to accurately forecast the future economic environment could result in volatility in the provision as a result of the new accounting standard.

If the value of real estate in our core markets declines, a significant portion of our loan portfolio could become under-collateralized, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition to considering the financial strength and cash flow characteristics of borrowers, we often secure loans with real estate collateral. At December 31, 2017,2019, approximately 64%60% of the Bank’s loans had real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower but may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. If the value of real estate in our core markets were to decline further, a significant portion of our loan portfolio could become under-collateralized. As a result, if we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, our earnings and capital could be adversely affected.

Our use of appraisals in deciding whether to make a loan on or secured by real property or how to value such loan in the future may not accurately describe the net value of the real property collateral that we can realize.

In considering whether to make a loan secured by real property, we generally require an appraisal of the property. However, an appraisal is only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made, and, as real estate values in our market area have experienced changes in value in relatively short periods of time, this estimate might not accurately describe the net value of the real property collateral after the loan has been closed. If the appraisal does not reflect the amount that may be obtained upon any sale or foreclosure of the property, we may not realize an amount equal to the indebtedness secured by the property. The valuation of the property may negatively impact the continuing value of such loan and could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.

In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers and counterparties, we rely on information furnished to us by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information. We also rely on representations of customers and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. For example, in deciding whether to extend credit to customers, we may assume that a customer’s audited financial statements conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. Our earnings and our financial condition could be negatively impacted to the extent the information furnished to us by and on behalf of borrowers is not correct or complete or is noncompliant with GAAP.

21

We will realize additional future losses if the proceeds we receive upon liquidation of non‑performingnon-performing assets are less than the fair value of such assets.

We have a strategy to manage our non-performing assets aggressively, a portion of which may not be currently identified. Non-performing assets are recorded on our financial statements at fair value, as required under GAAP, unless these assets have been specifically identified for liquidation, in which case they are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. In



current market conditions, we are likely to realize additional future losses if the proceeds we receive upon dispositions of non-performing assets are less than the recorded fair value of such assets.

Changes in the policies of monetary authorities and other government action could materially adversely affect our profitability.

The Bank’s results of operations are affected by policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve include open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate or the federal funds rate on bank borrowings and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. In view of changing conditions in the national economy and in the money markets particularly in light of the continuing threat of terrorist attacks and the current military operations and other instances of unrest in the Middle East, and the economic and political situations in certain parts of the world, we cannot predict with certainty possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or our business and earnings. Furthermore, the actions of the U.S. government and other governments in responding to such terrorist attacks or events in these or other regions may result in currency fluctuations, exchange controls, market disruption and other adverse effects.

Fluctuations in interest rates could reduce our profitability.

Our earnings are significantly dependent on our net interest income, as we realize income primarily from the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. We are unable to predict future fluctuations in interest rates, which are affected by many factors, including inflation, economic growth, employment rates, fiscal and monetary policy and disorder and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets. Our net interest income is affected not only by the level and direction of interest rates, but also by the shape of the yield curve and relationships between interest sensitive instruments and key interest driver rates, as well as balance sheet growth, customer loan and deposit preferences and the timing of changes in these variables. Our net interest income also may decline based on our exposure to a difference in short-term and long-term interest rates. A relatively high cost for securing deposits, combined with lower interest rates that can be charged on customer loans, will place downward pressure on our net interest income. Our asset-liability management strategy may not be effective in preventing changes in interest rates from having a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to risks in the event of certain borrower defaults, which could have an adverse impact on our liquidity position and results of operations.

We may be required to repurchase mortgage loans or indemnify mortgage loan purchasers as a result of certain borrower defaults, which could adversely affect our liquidity position, results of operations, and financial condition. WhenPrior to the exit of our mortgage banking business in connection with the Branch Sale, when we sell mortgage loans, we arewere required to make customary representations and warranties to the purchaser about the mortgage loans and the manner in which the loans were originated. In the event of a breach of any of the representations and warranties related to a loan sold, we could be liable for damages to the investor up to and including a “make whole” demand that involves, at the investor’s option, either reimbursing the investor for actual losses incurred on the loan or repurchasing the loan in full. Our maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of a make whole loan repurchase claim would be the unpaid principal balance of the loan to be repurchased along with any premium paid by the investor when the loan was purchased and other collection cost reimbursements. If repurchase demands increase, our liquidity position, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

22

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain executive management and qualified board members.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), the Dodd-Frank Act, and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations increases our legal and financial compliance costs, makes some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increases demand on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and operating results. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. We may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants, which will increase our costs and expenses.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.

The fact that we are a public company has increased the costs of our director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage in the future. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit and compensation committees, and qualified executive officers.




WeAtlantic Capital may need to rely on the financial markets to provide needed capital.

Our common stock is listed and traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ACBI”. Although we anticipate that our capital resources will be adequate for the foreseeable future to meet our capital requirements, at times we may depend on the liquidity of the Nasdaq market to raise equity capital. If the market should fail to operate, or if conditions in the capital markets are adverse, we may be constrained in raising capital. Downgrades in the opinions of the analysts that follow us may cause our stock price to fall and significantly limit our ability to access the markets for additional capital requirements. Should these risks materialize, our ability to further expand our operations through internal growth or acquisition may be limited.

Negative publicity about financial institutions, generally, or about ourthe Company or the Bank, specifically, could damage our reputation and adversely impact our liquidity, business operations or financial results.

Reputation risk, or the risk to our business from negative publicity, is inherent in our business. Negative publicity can result from the actual or alleged conduct of financial institutions, generally, or our Company or the Bank, specifically, in any number of activities, including leasing and lending practices, corporate governance, and actions taken by government regulators in response to those activities. Negative publicity can adversely affect our ability to keep and attract customers and can expose us to litigation and regulatory action, any of which could negatively affect our liquidity, business operations or financial results.

23

Increases in our expenses and other costs could adversely affect our financial results.

Our expenses and other costs, such as operating expenses and hiring new employees, directly affect our earnings results. In light of the extremely competitive environment in which we operate, and because the size and scale of many of our competitors provides them with increased operational efficiencies, it is important that we are able to successfully manage such expenses. We are aggressively managing our expenses in the current economic environment, but as our business develops, changes or expands, and as we hire additional personnel, additional expenses can arise. Other factors that can affect the amount of our expenses include legal and administrative cases and proceedings, which can be expensive to pursue or defend. In addition, changes in accounting policies can significantly affect how we calculate expenses and earnings.

Fluctuations in interest rates could reduce our profitability.
Our earnings are significantly dependent on our net interest income, as we realize income primarily from the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. We may be unable to predict future fluctuations in market interest rates, which are affected by many factors, including inflation, economic growth, employment rates, fiscal and monetary policy and disorder and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets. Our net interest income is affected not only by the level and direction of interest rates, but also by the shape of the yield curve and relationships between interest sensitive instruments and key interest driver rates, as well as balance sheet growth, customer loan and deposit preferences and the timing of changes in these variables. Our net interest income also may decline based on our exposure to a difference in short-term and long-term interest rates. A relatively high cost for securing deposits, combined with lower interest rates that can be charged on customer loans, will place downward pressure on our net interest income. Our asset‑liability management strategy may not be effective in preventing changes in interest rates from having a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain changes in interest rates, inflation, deflation or the financial markets could affect demand for our products and our results of operations and cash flows.

Loan originations, and potentially loan revenues, could be materially adversely impacted by sharply rising interest rates. Conversely, sharply falling rates could increase prepayments within our securities portfolio and fixed rate loans lowering interest earnings from those investments.earnings. An unanticipated increase in inflation could cause our operating costs related to salaries and benefits, technology and supplies to increase at a faster pace than revenues.

The fair market value of our securities portfolio and the investment income from these securities also fluctuate depending on general economic and market conditions. In addition, actual net investment income and/or cash flows from investments that carry prepayment risk, such as mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, may differ from those anticipated at the time of investment as a result of interest rate fluctuations.

Interest rate increases often result in larger payment requirements for our borrowers, which increase the potential for default and could result in a decrease in the demand for loans. At the same time, the marketability of the property securing a loan may be adversely affected by any reduced demand resulting from higher interest rates. In a declining interest rate environment, there may be an increase in prepayments on loans as borrowers refinance their loans at lower rates. In addition, in a low interest rate



environment, loan customers often pursue long‑termlong-term fixed rate credits, which could adversely affect our earnings and net interest margin if rates increase. Changes in interest rates also can affect the value of our loans and other assets. An increase in interest rates that adversely affects the ability of borrowers to pay the principal or interest on loans may lead to increases in nonperforming assets, charge-offs and delinquencies, further increases to the allowance for loan losses, and a reduction of income recognized, among others, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
Our strategic initiatives may not be implemented successfully. We may not realize the benefits of our strategic initiatives in the anticipated timeline or at all, and the implementation of our strategy may result in costs or loss of revenue that could adversely impact our results of operations.
Implementation of our strategy may involve organic growth initiatives, hiring groups of bankers, acquiring other financial institutions, branch offices or selected assets or deposits of financial institutions, reducing investment in or partially or completely exiting a line of business, or consolidating, closing or selling branch offices. Strategic transactions and other initiatives involved additional expense and also put a strain on our management, financial, operational and technical resources. In addition, while we endeavor to engage in strategic transactions and initiatives that will be beneficial to our operations, such initiatives involve a number of risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including:
there may be a substantial lag time between the time we incur the expenses associated with implementing strategic initiatives and the time when we generate sufficient assets, deposits and earnings to support the costs of such expansion or realize the anticipated benefits of the initiative;
the use of inaccurate estimates and judgments in evaluating credit, operations, management and market risks with respect to any target institution or assets;
the diligence we conduct with respect to any expansion opportunity may not be sufficient to properly evaluate the prospects of any such opportunity;
diluting our existing shareholders in an acquisition;
the time associated with negotiating a transaction or working on strategic plans, resulting in management’s attention being diverted from our existing business;
the time and expense of obtaining required regulatory approvals and complying with the terms and conditions of regulatory approvals, which may require us to dispose of acquired branches, sell certain segments of acquired loan portfolios, or impose other restrictions on our operations;
negotiations may be terminated by either party for a variety of reasons resulting in sunk costs associated with the particular transaction;
the time and expense of integrating new operations and personnel;
our lack of market expertise in new geographic markets that we may enter could negatively impact our ability to successfully grow our operations there, or cause us to incur unforeseen expenses in the growth of our operations;
the possible loss of key employees and customers of an acquired institution as a result of expansion into a new market, elimination or consolidation of branches, or an acquisition that is poorly conceived and executed;
the loss of customer deposits in connection with a branch closure, sale or consolidation eliminates a relatively inexpensive source of capital that we may not be able to replace without incurring additional expense;
the loss of loan customers in connection with a branch closure, sale or consolidation could result in a decrease in interest income that we may not be able to replace;
the elimination of a line of business could result in a greater than anticipated losses of customers, including customers who turn to one of our competitors to replace the products or services we no longer offer as well as traditional banking services; and
we could experience reputational damage associated with strategic initiatives, particularly closing or selling offices or exiting lines of business.
There is no assurance that we will successfully implement our strategic plan or meet our goals. The occurrence of any of the foregoing risks, or other risks not mentioned above, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition.

Liquidity is essential to the orderly function of our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities on terms that are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general. Factors that could negatively impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of an economic downturn in the markets in which our loans are concentrated, adverse regulatory action against us, or our inability to attract and retain deposits. Our ability to borrow could be impaired by factors that are not specific to us or our



region, such as a disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry in lightindustry.

24

Our use of brokered deposits may be limited or discouraged by bank regulators, which could adversely affect our liquidity.

liquidity.

We use brokered deposits to fund a portion of our operations. Our liquidity and our funding costs may be negatively affected if this funding source experiences reduced availability due to regulatory restrictions, loss of investor confidence or a move to other investments or as a result of increased Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance costs for these deposits. As of December 31, 2017, 5%2019, 3% of the Bank’s total deposits were composed of brokered deposits. These deposits are a mix between short-term brokered certificates of deposit and brokered money market accounts. Depositors that invest in brokered deposits are generally interest rate sensitive and well-informed about alternative markets and investments. Consequently, these types of deposits may not provide the same stability to our deposit base or provide the same enterprise value as traditional local retail deposit relationships. Brokered deposits are also considered wholesale funding by bank regulators and a dependence on wholesale funding may warrant increased regulatory review and higher FDIC insurance costs. Banks that are no longer “well capitalized” for bank regulatory purposes are limited in accepting or renewing brokered deposits. In addition, our costs of funds and profitability are likely to be adversely affected to the extent we have to rely upon higher cost borrowings from other institutional investors or brokers to fund loan demand and origination needs.

We face strong competition from larger, more established competitors that may inhibit our ability to competecompete. The Atlanta market area has experienced consolidation and expose us to greater lending risks.

disruption that may increase competition from both existing competitors and new market entrants.

The banking business is highly competitive, and we experience strong competition from many other financial institutions. We compete with commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds and other financial institutions, which operate in our primary market areas and elsewhere.

We compete with these institutions in attracting deposits and making loans and providing private banking services.loans. In addition, we primarily have to attract our customer base from other existing financial institutions and from new residents. We also compete with these institutions in recruiting employees who are critical to our success. Many of our competitors are well-established and much larger financial institutions. Many of our competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. We may face a competitive disadvantage as a result of our smaller size and relative lack of geographic diversification.

Our relatively small geographic footprint limits

The Atlanta market area has experienced significant consolidation and disruption in recent periods. This could result in increased competition as both established institutions and new market entrants position themselves to attract new customers and quality employees. Because we operate exclusively in the Atlanta metropolitan market and surrounding areas, increases in competition in our abilitymarket area will impact us to diversify macro-economic risk. We lend primarily to privately helda greater degree than if we were more geographically diversified. In addition, because we focus on small and mid-sized businesses, notmedium sized commercial enterprises, increases in competition for profit institutions, institutional caliber commercial real estate developers and investors, and individuals in the Metropolitan Atlanta and Eastern Tennessee areas which may exposethose types of customers will impact us to a greater lending risksdegree than those of banks lendingif we were focused on providing banking services to larger better capitalized businesses with longer operating histories. Asmore established business customers engaged in a community bank,broader range of commercial endeavors. Finally, because we are lessnot as large as some of our current and potential competitors, we may not be able to spread the risk of unfavorable local economic conditions than larger or more regional banks. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance that we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditionssuccessfully compete with other institutions in our primary market areas--Metropolitan Atlantain attracting and retaining the Interstate 75 corridor between Dalton, Georgia (approximately one hour northnumbers of Atlanta) and Jefferson City, Tennessee (approximately 30 minutes northemployees with the skill sets or business relationships necessary to support our planned growth.

25

Unpredictable economic conditions, public health emergencies, political crises, extreme weather conditions, natural disasters, or a natural disaster in any of our market areasother catastrophic events may have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

Substantially all of

Certain events that are beyond our borrowerscontrol, such as an overall economic downturn, public health emergency (such as the recent coronavirus outbreak), terrorist attack, political crisis, economic policies (such as trade restrictions, trade agreements and depositors are individuals and businesses located and doing businesstariffs), extreme weather, or natural disaster, whether occurring in our markets. Therefore,markets or globally, could adversely impact our success will depend on the general economic conditions in these areas,customers and more particularly in Metropolitan Atlanta and the Interstate 75 corridor between Dalton, Georgia (approximately one hour north of Atlanta) and Jefferson City, Tennessee (approximately 30 minutes north of Knoxville, Tennessee). Unlike with many of our larger competitors, the majority of our borrowers are located and doing business in such local markets. As a result,therefore our operations and profitabilityprofitability. For example, our construction and development borrowers could be impacted by shortages or price increases of building materials, our commercial and industrial borrowers could be impacted by reduced demand for their products or by interruptions in global, national or regional supply chains critical to their operations, and our local retail borrowers could be impacted by reduced foot traffic. In addition, our partners who provide certain services related to our financial technology, payment processing and treasury management services may be more adversely affected byhave national or global operations that expose them to the impact of such events occurring outside of our market area. Any negative impact on our customers or our partners could result in interruption in delivery of our services, reduced demand for our products and services, increased loan delinquencies, declines in the value of collateral, and decreases in the levels and duration of customer deposits. Furthermore, because our customers and the collateral securing our loans are concentrated in the Atlanta metropolitan area, any event that is specific to Atlanta or the southeastern United States, or that has a local economic downturn or natural disaster in such markets than those of larger, more geographically diverse competitors. Accordingly, any regional or local economic downturn, or natural or man-made disaster, that affects any of the markets in which we operate, including existing or prospective property or borrowers in such marketsdisparate impact on our market areas, may affect us and our profitability more significantly and more adverselyto a greater degree than our more geographically diversified competitors, which could have a material adverse effectcompetitors. The impact of any of these events on our business,customers or on us directly would negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations and prospects.


operations.

The soundness of other financial institutions with which we do business could adversely affect us.


Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other



relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, including counterparties in the financial industry, such as commercial banks and other institutional clients. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. Many of these transactions will expose us to credit risk in the event of default of a counterparty or client. In addition, this credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral we hold cannot be realized upon liquidation or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the financial instrument exposure due to us. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

The costs and effects of litigation, investigations or similar matters, or adverse facts and developments related thereto, could materially affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may be involved from time to time in a variety of litigation, investigations or similar matters arising out of our business. Our insurance may not cover all claims that may be asserted against it and indemnification rights to which we are entitled may not be honored, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any litigation or investigation significantly exceed our insurance coverage, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, premiums for insurance covering the financial and banking sectors are rising. We may not be able to obtain appropriate types or levels of insurance in the future, nor may we be able to obtain adequate replacement policies with acceptable terms or at historic rates, if at all.

We are subject to various taxing jurisdictions where we conduct business. We assess the appropriate tax treatment of transactions and filing positions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and other pertinent information and maintain tax accruals consistent with our evaluation. This evaluation incorporates assumptions and estimates that involve a high degree of judgment and subjectivity. Changes in the results of these evaluations could have a material impact on our operating results.

26

Environmental liability associated with lending activities could result in losses.

In the course of our business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing our loans. If hazardous substances are discovered on any of these properties, we may be liable to governmental entities or third parties for the costs of remediation of the hazard, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Many environmental laws impose liability regardless of whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the contamination. In addition, if we arrange for the disposal of hazardous or toxic substances at another site, we may be liable for the costs of cleaning up and removing those substances from the site, even if we neither own nor operate the disposal site. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially limit the use of properties that we acquire through foreclosure, reduce their value or limit our ability to sell them in the event of a default on the loans they secure. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability. Our loan policies requiring certain due diligence of high risk industries and properties may not be effective in reducing the risks of environmental liability resulting from non-performing loan and/or foreclosed property.

We may not be able to retain, attract and motivate qualified individuals.

Our success depends on our ability to retain, attract and motivate qualified individuals in key positions throughout the organization. Competition for qualified individuals in most activities in which we are engaged can be intense, and we may not be able to hire or retain the people we want and/or need. Although we have entered into employment agreements with certain key employees, and have incentive compensation plans aimed, in part, at long-term employee retention, the unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could still occur, and such events may have a material adverse impact on our business because of the loss of the employee’s skills, knowledge of our market, and years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. If we are unable to retain, attract and motivate qualified individuals in key positions, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

A failure in or breach of our operational or security systems, or those of our third party service providers, including as a result of cyber-attacks, could disrupt our business, result in unintentional disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, or damage our reputation.

As a financial institution, our operations rely heavily on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information on our computer systems and networks. Any failure, interruption or breach in security or operational integrity of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our Internet banking system, treasury management products, check and document imaging, remote deposit capture systems, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems.



There has been an increase in the number and sophistication of criminal cyber-security attacks against companies where customer and other sensitive information has been compromised. The financial services industry has experienced an increase in the number and severity of cyber-attacks, including efforts to hack or breach security measures in order to access, obtain or misuse information, misappropriate financial assets, corrupt or destroy data, disrupt operations, or install viruses, “ransomware” or other malware. Although we devote significant resources to maintaining the integrity of our systems, we are not able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. The protective policies and procedures we currently have in place or which we implement in the future may not be sufficient as the nature and sophistication of such threats continue to evolve. We may be required to expend significant additional resources in the future to modify and enhance our protective measures.

27

In addition, our business operations rely on third party vendors to provide services such as exchanges, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries, data processing, recording and monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, Internet connections and network access. Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyber-attacks, and because the transactions involve third parties and environments such as the point of sale that we do not control or secure, future security breaches or cyber-attacks affecting any of these third parties could impact us through no fault of our own, and in some cases we may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them. Such parties could also be the source of an attack on, or breach of, our operational systems. The cyber-security, information and operational risks that our third party service providers face may be different than the risks we face, and we do not directly control any of such service providers’ information security operations, including the efforts that they may take to mitigate risks or the level of cyber/privacy liability insurance that they may carry. Any problems caused or experienced by these third parties, including cyber-attacks and security breaches, could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our customers and otherwise conduct our business. Furthermore, our vendors could also be sources of operational and information security risk to us, including from breakdowns or failures of their own systems or capacity constraints. Replacing these third party vendors could also create significant delay and expense.

Any failures, interruptions or security breaches in our information systems, or the systems operated by our third party service providers, could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, impair our ability to provide our services or maintain availability of our systems to customers, result in a violation of privacy or other laws, subject us to regulatory enforcement or other actions, or expose us to remediation costs, increased insurance premiums, civil litigation, fines, penalties or losses not covered by insurance. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Our business is dependent on technology, and an inability to invest in technological improvements or obtain reliable technology and technological support may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of institutions to reduce costs. We depend in part upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that satisfy their operational needs. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements and third-party support. There can be no assurance that we will effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or successfully market these products and services to our customers. We also rely on our computer systems. For example, we rely on our computer systems to accurately track and record our assets and liabilities. If our computer systems become unreliable, fail or experience a breach of security, our ability to maintain accurate financial records may be impaired, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is highly correlated to local economic conditions in a geographically concentrated part of the United States.
Unlike larger organizations that are more geographically diversified, our banking offices are primarily concentrated in select markets in Georgia and Tennessee. As a result of this geographic concentration, our financial results depend largely upon economic conditions in these market areas. Deterioration in economic conditions in the markets we serve could result in one or more of the following:
an increase in loan delinquencies;
an increase in problem assets and foreclosures;
a decrease in the demand for our products and services; and
a decrease in the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate, in turn reducing customers’ borrowing power, the value of assets associated with problem loans and collateral coverage.



Impairment of our investment securities could require charges to earnings, which could result in a negative impact on our results of operations.

In assessing the impairment of investment securities, we consider the length of time and extent to which the fair value has beenis less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers, whether the decline in market value was affected by macroeconomic conditions and whether we have the intent to sell the security or will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. Future declines in the market value or our investment securities may result in other-than-temporary impairment of these securities, which could lead to charges that could have a material adverse effect on our net income and capital levels.

The value of our goodwill and other intangible assets may decline in the future.

future.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $27.6$23.0 million of goodwill and other intangible assets. A significant decline in our financial condition, a significant adverse change in the business climate, slower growth rates or a significant and sustained decline in the price of our common stock may necessitate taking charges in the future related to the impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets. If we were to conclude that a future write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets is necessary, we would record the appropriate charge, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

28

Risks Related to Legislative and Regulatory Events

The Dodd-Frank Act and related regulations may adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

The Dodd-Frank Act created a new agency, the CFPB, with power to promulgate and enforce consumer protection laws. Smaller depository institutions, including those with $10 billion or less in assets, will beare subject to the CFPB’s rule-writing authority, and existing depository institution regulatory agencies will retain examination and enforcement authority for such institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act also established a Financial Stability Oversight Council chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury with authority to identify institutions and practices that might pose a systemic risk and, among other things, includes provisions affecting:

·

corporate governance and executive compensation of all companies whose securities are registered with the SEC;

corporate governance and executive compensation of all companies whose securities are registered with the SEC;

·

FDIC insurance assessments;

FDIC insurance assessments;

·

interchange fees for debit cards, which would be set by the Federal Reserve under a restrictive “reasonable and proportional cost” per transaction standard, and;

interchange fees for debit cards, which would be set by the Federal Reserve under a restrictive “reasonable and proportional cost” per transaction standard, and;

·

minimum capital levels for bank holding companies, subject to a grandfather clause for financial institutions with less than $15 billion in assets.

minimum capital levels for bank holding companies, subject to a grandfather clause for financial institutions with less than $15 billion in assets.

The CFPB has broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks, including the authority to prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and practices. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act enhanced the regulation of mortgage banking and gave to the CFPB oversight of many of the core laws which regulate the mortgage industry and the authority to implement mortgage regulations. New regulations adopted and anticipated to be adopted by the CFPB will significantly impact consumer mortgage lending and servicing.

The Dodd-Frank Act and the resulting regulations will likely affect our business and operations in other ways which are difficult to predict at this time. However, compliance with these laws and regulations will result in additional costs, which may adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity, any of which may impact the market price of our common stock.
The CFPB’s “ability-to-repay” and “qualified mortgage” rules could have a negative impact on our loan origination process and foreclosure proceedings.
The CFPB has adopted rules that are likely to impact our residential mortgage lending practices, and the residential mortgage market generally including rules that implement the “ability‑to‑repay” requirement and provide protection from liability for “qualified mortgages,” as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The ability-to-repay rule requires lenders to consider, among other things, income, employment status, assets, payment amounts, and credit history before approving a mortgage, and provides a compliance “safe harbor” for lenders that issue certain “qualified mortgages.” The rules define a “qualified mortgage” to have certain specified characteristics, and generally prohibit loans with negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or terms exceeding 30 years from being qualified mortgages. The rule also establishes general underwriting criteria for qualified mortgages, including that monthly payments be calculated based on the highest payment that will apply in the first five years of the loan and that the borrower have a total debt-to-income ratio that is less than or equal to 43%. Although the new “qualified mortgage” rules may provide better definition and more certainty regarding regulatory requirements, the rules may also increase


our compliance burden and reduce our lending flexibility and discretion, which could negatively impact our ability to originate new loans and the cost of originating new loans. Any loans that we make outside of the “qualified mortgage” criteria could expose us to an increased risk of liability and reduce or delay our ability to foreclose on the underlying property. Additionally, qualified “higher priced mortgages” only provide a rebuttable presumption of compliance and thus may be more susceptible to challenges from borrowers. It is difficult to predict how the CFPB’s “qualified mortgage” rules will impact us, but any decreases in loan origination volume or increases in compliance and foreclosure costs could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

The CFPB continues to reshape consumer financial laws through its rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement authorities, including enforcement of unfair, deceptive or abusive practices, which may directly impact the business operations of depository institutions offering consumer financial products or services including the Bank.

Banking regulatory agencies have increasingly used a general consumer protection statute to address “unethical” or otherwise “bad” business practices that may not necessarily fall directly under the purview of a specific banking or consumer finance law.

The law of choice for enforcement against such business practices generally has been Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act-the primary federal law that prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce (“UDAP” or “FTC Act”).  “Unjustified consumer injury” is the principal focus of the FTC Act. Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, there was little formal guidance to provide insight to the parameters for compliance with the UDAP law. However, the UDAP provisions were expanded under the Dodd-Frank Act to apply to “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” (“UDAAP”), which has been delegated to the CFPB for supervision. The CFPB has published and periodically updates its first Supervision and Examination Manual that addresses compliance with and the examination of UDAAP and has enacted a number of regulations governing the conduct of consumer lending activities. The potential reach of the CFPB’sCFPB has broad rulemaking powers, and enforcement authority with respect to UDAAP, authorityas well as numerous other Federal consumer financial laws, and any future regulations adopted or practices targeted for enforcement by the CFPB could have wide-ranging implications on the operations of financial institutions offering consumer financial products or services, including the Bank is currently unknown.Bank.

29

The Federal Reserve has adopted capital requirements for financial institutions that may require us to retain or raise additional capital and/or reduce dividends.

The Federal Reserve adopted increased regulatory capital requirements that implemented changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act and portions of the Basel III regulatory capital reforms. In the future, the capital requirements for bank holding companies may require us to retain or raise additional capital, restrict our ability to pay dividends and repurchase shares of our common stock, and restrict our ability to provide certain forms of discretionary executive compensation and/or require other changes to our strategic plans. The rules could restrict our ability to grow and implement our future business strategies, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

We could be subject to adverse changes in tax laws, regulations and interpretations or challenges to our tax positions.

positions.

From time to time, changes in tax laws or regulations may be proposed or enacted that could adversely affect our overall tax liability. For example, the U.S. tax reform legislationTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which was enacted on December 22, 2017, representsrepresented a significant overhaul of the U.S. federal tax code. This tax legislation, and additional rules and regulations that have been promulgated since then, significantly changed the federal income tax landscape. Although, the legislation reduced the U.S. statutory corporate tax rate to 21% and made other changes that could have a favorable impact onfavorably impacted our overall U.S. federal tax liability, in a given period. However, the tax legislationit also included a number of provisions that have and will continue to negatively impact our overall U.S. federal tax liability, including, but not limited to, the limitation or elimination of various deductions or credits (including for interest expense and for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), the imposition of taxes on certain cross-border payments or transfers, the changing of the timing of the recognition of certain income and deductions or their character, and the limitation of asset basis under certain circumstances, that could significant and adversely affect our U.S. federal income tax position. As previously disclosed, the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate to 21%, will cause our net deferred tax asset to be revalued. Our net deferred tax asset represents net operating loss carryforwards that will be used to reduce corporate taxes expected to be paid in the future as well as differences between the carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities carried on the Company’s balance sheet. We have performed an analysis to determine the impact of the revaluation of the deferred tax asset and anticipate that the value of the deferred tax asset will be reduced significantly.circumstances). The legislation also made significant changes to the tax rules applicable to insurance companies and other entities with which we do business. We are continuingAdditional guidance is expected to evaluatecontinue to be issued by the overall impactInternal Revenue Service, the Department of this tax legislationTreasury, or other governing bodies that may significantly differ from our interpretation of the law, which may result in a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, results of operations and U.S. federal income tax position.or financial conditions. There can be no assurance that changes in tax laws or regulations, both within the U.S. and the other jurisdictions in which we operate, will not materially and adversely affect our effective tax rate, tax payments, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, changes in tax laws and regulations that impact our customers and counterparties or the economy generally may also impact our financial condition and results of operations.


In addition, tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to varying interpretations, and any significant failure to comply with applicable tax laws and regulations in all relevant jurisdictions could give rise to substantial penalties and liabilities. Any changes



in enacted tax laws (such as the recent U.S. tax legislation), rules or regulatory or judicial interpretations; any adverse outcome in connection with tax audits in any jurisdiction; or any change in the pronouncements relating to accounting for income taxes could materially and adversely impact our effective tax rate, tax payments, business, operating results and financial condition.
A new accounting standard may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The measure of our allowance for loan losses is dependent on the adoption and interpretation of accounting standards.  The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued a new credit impairment model, the Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL model, which will become effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 (effective for the calendar year beginning January 1, 2020).  Under the CECL model, we will be required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost at the net amount expected to be collected.  The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount, which will require us to increase the types of data we collect and review to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter.  This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model currently required under GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred.  Accordingly, regardless of any actual changes to the composition or performance of our loan portfolio, the new accounting standard may require an increase in our allowance for loan losses or expenses incurred to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses.  Moreover, the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for loan losses.  If we are required to materially increase our level of allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in accounting standards and management’s selection of accounting methods, including assumptions and estimates, could materially impact our financial statements.

From time to time the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) update GAAP, which govern the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in changes to previously reported financial results, or a cumulative charge to retained earnings. In addition, management is required to use certain assumptions and estimates in preparing our financial statements, including determining the fair value of certain assets and liabilities, among other items. Incorrect assumptions or estimates may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

30

We are subject to regulation by various federal and state entities.

We are subject to the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the OCC, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC. New regulations issued by these agencies may adversely affect our ability to carry on our business activities. We are subject to various federal and state laws and certain changes in these laws and regulations may adversely affect our operations. Noncompliance with certain of these regulations may impact our business plans, including our ability to branch, offer certain products or execute existing or planned business strategies.

We are also subject to the accounting rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the FASB. Changes in accounting rules could materially adversely affect the reported financial statements or our results of operations and may also require extraordinary efforts or additional costs to implement. Any of these laws or regulations may be modified or changed from time to time, and we cannot be assured that such modifications or changes will not adversely affect us.

Regulators periodically examine our business and we may be required to remediate adverse examination findings.

findings.

The Federal Reserve the FDIC and the OCC periodically examine our business, including our compliance with laws and regulations, and we may become subject to other regulatory agency examinations in the future. If, as a result of an examination, a federal banking agency were to determine that our financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of any of our operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we were in violation of any law or regulation, it may require us to take a number of different remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth by preventing us from acquiring other financial institutions or limiting our ability to expand our business by engaging in new activities, to change the asset composition of our portfolio or balance sheet, to assess civil monetary penalties against our officers or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors,



to terminate our deposit insurance and place us into receivership or conservatorship. Any regulatory action against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulations relating to privacy, information security and data protection could increase our costs, affect or limit how Atlantic Capital collects and uses personal information and adversely affect our business opportunities.

Atlantic Capital is subject to various privacy, information security and data protection laws, including requirements concerning security breach notification, and we could be negatively impacted by them. For example, certain of our business is subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) and implementing regulations and guidance. Among other things, the GLBA:

·

imposes certain limitations on the ability of financial institutions to share consumers’ nonpublic personal information with nonaffiliated third parties;

imposes certain limitations on the ability

·

requires that financial institutions provide certain disclosures to consumers about their information collection, sharing and security practices and affords customers the right to “opt out” of the institution’s disclosure of their personal financial information to nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions); and

·

requires financial institutions to develop, implement and maintain a written comprehensive information security program containing safeguards that are appropriate to the financial institution’s size and complexity, the nature and scope of the financial institution’s activities, and the sensitivity of customer information processed by the financial institution as well as plans for responding to data security breaches.

31

requires that financial institutions provide certain disclosures to consumers about their information collection, sharing and security practices and affords customers the right to “opt out” of the institution’s disclosure of their personal financial information to nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions); and
requires financial institutions to develop, implement and maintain a written comprehensive information security program containing safeguards that are appropriate to the financial institution’s size and complexity, the nature and scope of the financial institution’s activities, and the sensitivity of customer information processed by the financial institution as well as plans for responding to data security breaches.

Moreover, various United States federal banking regulatory agencies, states and foreign jurisdictions have enacted data security breach notification requirements with varying levels of individual, consumer, regulatory and/or law enforcement notification in certain circumstances in the event of a security breach. Many of these requirements also apply broadly to businesses that accept our payment. In many countries that have yet to impose data security breach notification requirements, regulators have increasingly used the threat of significant sanctions and penalties by data protection authorities to encourage voluntary notification and discourage data security breaches.

Furthermore, legislators and/or regulators in the United States are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, information security and data protection laws that potentially could have a significant impact on our current and planned privacy, data protection and information security‑relatedsecurity-related practices, our collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer and/or employee information, and some of our current or planned business activities. This could also increase our costs of compliance and business operations and could reduce income from certain business initiatives. This includes increased privacy-related enforcement activity at the federal level, by the Federal Trade Commission, as well as at the state level, such as with regard to mobile applications.

Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection and information security laws (including those regarding security breach notification) affecting customer and/or employee data to which we are subject could result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict our ability to provide certain products and services, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability. Our failure to comply with privacy, data protection and information security laws could result in potentially significant regulatory and/or governmental investigations and/or actions, litigation, fines, sanctions, and damage to our reputation and brand.

Anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing laws could have significant adverse consequences for the Company.

We maintain an enterprise-wide program designed to enable us to comply with applicable anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing laws and regulations, including the Bank Secrecy Act and the USA PATRIOT ACT. This program includes policies, procedures, processes and other internal controls designed to identify, monitor, manage and mitigate the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing posed by our products, services, customers and geographic locale. These controls include procedures and processes to detect and report suspicious transactions, perform customer due diligence, respond to requests from law enforcement, and meet all recordkeeping and reporting requirements related to particular transactions involving currency or monetary.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Limited trading in our common stock may impact the ability of shareholders to sell their shares and the price of our common stock.


stock.

Trading activity in our common stock may be limited. If an active market for our common stock is not sustained, the market price of our common stock may be adversely impacted. This may make it difficult for our shareholders to sell their shares at a favorable price or to sell their shares at all. In addition, any negative impact on the price or liquidity of our common stock may impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund our operations by offering and selling additional shares and our ability to use our common stock as consideration in future acquisitions.


32


Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the public markets, or the perception of such sales, could depress the market price of our common stock.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public markets and the availability of those shares for sale could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, future issuances of equity securities, including pursuant to outstanding options, could dilute the interests of our existing shareholders and could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. We may issue such additional equity or convertible securities to raise additional capital. Depending on the amount offered and the levels at which we offer the stock, issuances of common or preferred stock could be substantially dilutive to shareholders of our common stock. Moreover, to the extent that we issue restricted stock, phantom shares, stock appreciation rights, options or warrants to purchase our common stock in the future and those stock appreciation rights, options or warrants are exercised or as shares of the restricted stock vest, our shareholders may experience further dilution. Holders of our shares of common stock have no preemptive rights that entitle holders to purchase their pro-rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series and, therefore, such sales or offerings could result in increased dilution to our shareholders. We cannot predict with certainty the effect that future sales of our common stock would have on the market price of our common stock.

We arewill cease to be an emerging growth company on or before December 31, 2020 and, we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companiesas a result, will makeincur additional costs and experience increased demands placed upon on our common stock less attractivemanagement.

.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and, for so long as we continue to qualify as such, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. In addition, even if we comply with the greater obligations of public companies that are not emerging growth companies, we may avail ourselves of the reduced requirements applicable to emerging growth companies from time to time in the future, so long as we are an emerging growth company. We will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years, though we may cease to be an emerging growth company earlier under certain circumstances, including if, before the end of such five years, we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (which depends on, among other things, having a market value of common stock held by non-affiliates in excess of $700 million) or if our total annual gross revenues equal or exceed $1 billion in a fiscal year. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive becausewhile we continue to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile. We will continue to be deemed an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1.07 billion (as indexed for inflation); (ii) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of ourinitial public offering, which is December 31, 2020; (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt; or (iv) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which would generally occur upon our attaining a public float of at least $700 million. Once we lose emerging growth company status, we expect to incur significant costs as a result of complying with additional compliance and reporting requirements, and our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to ensure that we comply with additional reporting requirements. Such initiatives and requirements will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. Any changes we make to comply with these obligations may not be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a timely basis, or at all.

33

Our stock repurchase program may not enhance long-term stockholder value and stock repurchases, if any, could increase the volatility of the price of our common stock and will diminish our cash reserves.

In March 2020, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to $25 million of its issued and outstanding common stock and terminated the previous program, which was substantially completed in the first quarter of 2020.  The timing and actual number of shares repurchased depend on a variety of factors including the timing of open trading windows, price, corporate and regulatory requirements, available cash, and other market conditions. The program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. Repurchases pursuant to our stock repurchase program could affect our stock price and increase its volatility. The existence of a stock repurchase program could also cause our stock price to be higher than it would be in the absence of such a program and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. Additionally, repurchases under our stock repurchase program will diminish our cash reserves, which impacts our ability to pursue possible future strategic opportunities and acquisitions, support our operations, invest in securities and pay dividends and could result in lower overall returns on our cash balances. Stock repurchases may not enhance shareholder value because the market price of our common stock may decline below the levels at which we repurchased shares of stock, and short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the program’s effectiveness.

A number of factors could cause the price of our common stock to be volatile or to decline.

The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. In addition, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in the share prices and trading volumes that affect the market prices of the shares of many companies. These broad market fluctuations have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:

·

actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;

actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;

·

changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other financial institutions;

changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other financial institutions;

·

failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;

failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;

·

speculation in the press or investment community;

speculation in the press or investment community;

·

strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

·

actions by institutional shareholders;

actions by institutional shareholders;

·

fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;

fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;

·

general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services industry;

general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services industry;

·

proposed or adopted regulatory changes or developments;

proposed or adopted regulatory changes or developments;

·

anticipated or pending investigations, proceedings or litigation that involve or affect us or the financial services industry; or

anticipated or pending investigations, proceedings or litigation that involve or affect us or the financial services industry; or

·

domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance.

domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance.




The holders of our subordinated notes have rights that are senior to those of our shareholders.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $50 million of subordinated notes outstanding. The subordinated notes are senior to shares of our common stock. As a result, we must make payments on the subordinated notes before any dividends can be paid on our common stock and, in the event of bankruptcy, dissolution, or liquidation, the holders of the subordinated notes must be satisfied before any distributions can be made to the holders of the common stock. Our ability to pay future distributions depends upon the earnings of the Bank and the issuance of dividends from the Bank to the Company, which may be inadequate to service the obligations.

34

The amount of interest payable on our 6.25% Fixed to Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2025 will vary after September 19, 2020.

The interest rate on our 6.25% Fixed to Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2025 will vary after September 29, 2020. From and including the issue date of such notes to but excluding September 30, 2020, the notes will bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.25% per year. From September 30, 2020 to the maturity date, the notes will bear interest at an annual floating rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 468 basis points for any interest period. If interest rates rise, the cost of our subordinated notes may increase, negatively affecting our net income. For additional information regarding the subordinated notes, see Note 11 – Other Borrowings and Long Term Debt in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

We may borrow funds or issue additional debt and equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, any of which may be senior to our common stock as to distributions and in liquidation, which could negatively affect the value of our common stock.

In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by entering into debt or debt-like financing that is unsecured or secured by all or up to all of our assets, or by issuing additional debt or equity securities, which could include issuances of secured or unsecured commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior notes, subordinated notes, preferred stock, common stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities. In the event of our liquidation, our lenders and holders of our debt and preferred securities would receive a distribution of our available assets before distributions to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to incur debt and issue securities in our future offerings will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate with certainty the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings and debt financings. Further, market conditions could require us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of our securities in the future. In addition, the borrowing of funds or the issuance of debt would increase our leverage and decrease our liquidity, and the issuance of additional equity securities would dilute the interests of our existing shareholders.

Our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders is limited.

Our primary source of cash is dividends we receive from the Bank. Therefore, our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders depends on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to us. We haveAtlantic Capital has not historically paid dividends to shareholders and did not pay dividends in 2017, 20162019, 2018, or 2015.2017. Additionally, banks and bank holding companies are subject to significant regulatory restrictions on the payment of cash dividends. In light of regulatory restrictions and our plans to build capital, we currently intend to reinvest the earnings of the Bank and to not pay any dividends for the foreseeable future. Our future dividend policy will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, regulatory requirements and other factors that the boards of directors of the Company and the Bank consider relevant.

We may not be able to raise additional capital on terms favorable to us or at all.

In the future, should we need additional capital to support our business, expand our operations or maintain our minimum capital requirements, we may not be able to raise additional funds. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on, among other things, conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside of our control, and our financial performance at that time. We cannot provide assurance that such financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we borrow money to provide capital to the Bank, we must obtain prior regulatory approvals, and we may not be able to pay this debt and could default. We cannot provide assurance that funds will be available to us on favorable terms or at all.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

35

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

The executive office of Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc., is and the headquarters of Atlantic Capital Bank,  are located at 3280 Peachtree945 East Paces Ferry Road NE, Suite 1600, Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia. The headquarters of Atlantic Capital Bank, N.A.This property is located at 1110 Market Street, #300, Chattanooga, Hamilton County, Tennessee. Both properties are leased.  Atlantic Capital provides services or performs operational functions at 205 additional locations, all of which 10 are owned and 10 are leased.  These offices are located in Cobb County, Fulton WhitfieldCounty and OconeeAthens-Clarke County, Georgia, and Hamilton Union, Jefferson, Knox, and Loudon County, Tennessee.

We believe that our banking offices are in good condition, and are suitable to our needs.  We are not aware of any environmental problems with the properties that we own or lease that would be material, either individually, or in the aggregate, to our operations or financial condition.



ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in routine litigation and various legal proceedings related to the Company’s operations.  Currently, there is no pending litigation or proceedings that management believes will have a material adverse effect, either individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


36



PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) trading under the symbol “ACBI.” The following table sets forth for

Holders

At March 2,  2020, there were 289 record shareholders.  We estimate the period indicated the high and low per share sale pricesnumber of beneficial shareholders to be much higher as many of our common stock on Nasdaq.

  2017 2016
  Price Per ShareCash Dividends Declared Price Per ShareCash Dividends Declared
Quarter Ended: HighLowClose HighLowClose
March 31 $20.20
$17.48
$18.95
$
 $14.90
$11.55
$13.94
$
June 30 $19.85
$18.15
$19.00
$
 $14.58
$12.92
$14.46
$
September 30 $19.60
$15.36
$18.15
$
 $15.74
$14.04
$14.98
$
December 31 $19.00
$15.20
$17.60
$
 $19.25
$13.80
$19.00
$
Holders
At March 1, 2018, there were 345 record shareholders and approximately 1,507 beneficial shareholders of the Company’s common stock.
shares are held by brokers or dealers for their customers in street name.

Dividend Policy

We did

Historically, we have not pay any dividends in fiscal 2017 or fiscal 2016. We have no current plans to pay any dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future and instead currently intend to retain earnings, if any, for future operations and expansion.

paid dividends.

The declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends on shares of our common stock will be at the sole discretion of our Board. Additionally, banks and bank holding companies are subject to significant regulatory restrictions on the payment of cash dividends. Our future dividend policy will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, regulatory requirements and other factors that the boards of directors of the Company and the Bank consider relevant. See “Item 1.1 –  Business - Supervision and Regulation - Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions”Dividends” above for regulatory restrictions which limit our ability to pay dividends.




Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph, which was prepared by SNL Financial LC (“SNL”) comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on Atlantic Capital’s common stock against the cumulative total return on the Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S. Companies) Index, the SNL U.S. Bank Index and the SNL Southeast U.S. Bank Index, commencing November 2, 2015 (when our shares began trading) and ending on December 31, 2017.2019.

37



Picture 4

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

On November 14, 2018, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to $85 million of its issued and outstanding common stock. After completing the repurchases pursuant to this authorization during the first quarter of 2020, the Company announced on March 4, 2020 that the Board of Directors had authorized a new stock repurchase program pursuant to which it may purchase up to $25 million of its issued and outstanding common stock. The new repurchase program commenced immediately with respect to $15 million of stock, and the remaining $10 million is subject to regulatory approval of a dividend from Atlantic Capital Bank to Atlantic Capital. The timing and amounts of any repurchases will depend on certain factors, including but not limited to market conditions and prices, available funds and alternative uses of capital. The stock repurchase program may be carried out through open-market purchases, block trades, negotiated private transactions and pursuant to a trading plan adopted in accordance with Rule 10b-18 or Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and will automatically expire on March 4, 2022. Any repurchased shares will constitute authorized but unissued shares.

38

During 2019, the Company repurchased $64.8 million, or 3,694,902 shares of common stock.  The following table presents information with respect to repurchases of our common shares during the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

    

Approximate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Number of

 

Dollar Value of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares Purchased

 

Shares that May

 

 

Total Number of

 

 

 

 

as Part of Publicly

 

Yet be Purchased

 

 

Shares

 

Average Price

 

Announced Plans

 

Under the Plans or

Period

 

Purchased

 

Paid per Share

 

or Programs

 

Programs

October 1 - 31, 2019

 

307,046

 

 

17.37

 

307,046

 

 

8,743,547

November 1 - 30, 2019

 

90,880

 

 

18.84

 

90,880

 

 

7,031,239

December 1 - 31, 2019

 

54,397

 

 

18.80

 

54,397

 

 

6,008,829

Total

 

452,323

 

$

18.34

 

452,323

 

$

6,008,829

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 

 

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

INCOME SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

$

105,847

 

$

94,760

 

$

75,818

 

$

63,273

 

$

43,546

 

Interest expense

 

 

24,983

 

 

18,513

 

 

12,986

 

 

9,554

 

 

4,600

 

Net interest income

 

 

80,864

 

 

76,247

 

 

62,832

 

 

53,719

 

 

38,946

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

2,712

 

 

1,946

 

 

3,218

 

 

3,816

 

 

8,035

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

 

78,152

 

 

74,301

 

 

59,614

 

 

49,903

 

 

30,911

 

Noninterest income

 

 

10,725

 

 

10,047

 

 

12,179

 

 

11,981

 

 

8,664

 

Noninterest expense

 

 

53,108

 

 

49,991

 

 

52,834

 

 

50,099

 

 

42,435

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

35,769

 

 

34,357

 

 

18,959

 

 

11,785

 

 

(2,860)

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

7,611

 

 

6,307

 

 

23,715

 

 

4,221

 

 

(117)

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

28,158

 

 

28,050

 

 

(4,756)

 

 

7,564

 

 

(2,743)

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

21,697

 

 

482

 

 

1,030

 

 

5,831

 

 

1,424

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

49,855

 

$

28,532

 

$

(3,726)

 

$

13,395

 

$

(1,319)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PER SHARE DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations

 

$

1.21

 

$

1.08

 

$

(0.19)

 

$

0.31

 

$

(0.18)

 

Basic earnings per share - discontinued operations

 

 

0.93

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.04

 

 

0.24

 

 

0.09

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 

 

2.14

 

 

1.10

 

 

(0.15)

 

 

0.54

 

 

(0.09)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations

 

$

1.20

 

$

1.07

 

$

(0.19)

 

$

0.30

 

$

(0.18)

 

Diluted earnings per share - discontinued operations

 

 

0.92

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.04

 

 

0.23

 

 

0.09

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

 

2.12

 

 

1.09

 

 

(0.15)

 

 

0.53

 

 

(0.09)

 

Book value per share

 

 

15.01

 

 

12.80

 

 

11.99

 

 

12.10

 

 

11.79

 

Dividends declared

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average equity

 

 

15.10

%  

 

9.05

%  

 

(1.17)

%  

 

4.44

%  

 

(0.77)

%  

Return on average assets

 

 

1.93

 

 

1.03

 

 

(0.14)

 

 

0.49

 

 

(0.08)

 

Taxable equivalent net interest margin - continuing operations

 

 

3.58

 

 

3.50

 

 

3.07

 

 

2.76

 

 

2.76

 

Efficiency ratio - continuing operations

 

 

57.99

 

 

57.93

 

 

70.44

 

 

76.25

 

 

89.13

 

Equity to assets

 

 

11.22

 

 

10.95

 

 

10.67

 

 

11.13

 

 

10.91

 

Dividend payout ratio

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSET QUALITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses to loans held for investment(2)

 

 

0.99

%  

 

1.03

%  

 

1.00

%  

 

1.04

%  

 

1.06

%  

Net charge-offs

 

$

2,028

 

$

342

 

$

4,469

 

$

2,126

 

$

551

 

Net charge-offs to average loans

 

 

0.11

%  

 

0.02

%  

 

0.23

%  

 

0.11

%  

 

0.05

%  

NPAs to total assets

 

 

0.26

 

 

0.20

 

 

0.14

 

 

0.13

 

 

0.40

 

ITEM 6.

(1)

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

On April 5, 2019, the Bank sold its Tennessee and northwest Georgia banking operations, including 14 branches and the mortgage business. The banking business and branches sold to FirstBank are reported as discontinued operations. Discontinued operations have been reported retrospectively for all prior periods presented.

(2)

The December 31, 2018 and 2019 ratios are calculated on a continuing operations basis. Prior period ratios have not been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of discontinued operations.

39

ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.(1)
       
            
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except share and per share data) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 
            
INCOME SUMMARY           
Interest income $96,271
 $88,217
 $48,967
 $36,542
 $32,537
 
Interest expense 15,129
 11,509
 4,923
 3,449
 3,615
 
Net interest income 81,142
 76,708
 44,044
 33,093
 28,922
 
Provision for loan losses 3,218
 3,816
 8,035
 488
 246
 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 77,924
 72,892
 36,009
 32,605
 28,676
 
Noninterest income 16,189
 21,732
 9,399
 5,342
 3,875
 
Noninterest expense 73,465
 73,280
 45,933
 26,574
 24,893
 
    Income before income taxes 20,648
 21,344
 (525) 11,373
 7,658
 
Income tax expense 24,374
 7,949
 794
 3,857
 2,515
 
Net income $(3,726) $13,395
 $(1,319) $7,516
 $5,143
 
            
PER SHARE DATA           
Basic earnings per share $(0.15) $0.54
 $(0.09) $0.56
 $0.38
 
Diluted earnings per share (0.15) 0.53
 (0.09) 0.55
 0.38
 
Book value per share 11.99
 12.10
 11.79
 10.48
 9.77
 
Dividends declared 
 
 
 
 
 
            
PERFORMANCE MEASURES           
Return on average equity (1.17)%4.44
%(0.77)%5.54
%3.96
%
Return on average assets (0.14) 0.49
 (0.08) 0.61
 0.46
 
Taxable equivalent net interest margin 3.28
 3.12
 2.99
 2.86
 2.75
 
Efficiency ratio 75.48
 74.44
 85.95
 69.14
 75.90
 
Equity to assets 10.67
 11.13
 10.91
 10.72
 10.67
 
Dividend payout ratio 
 
 
 
 
 
            
ASSET QUALITY           
Allowance for loan losses to loans held for investment 1.00
%1.04
%1.06
%1.10
%1.32
%
Net charge-offs $4,469
 $2,126
 $551
 $(118) $167
 
Net charge-offs to average loans 0.23
%0.11
%0.05
%(0.01)%0.02
%
NPAs to total assets 0.14
 0.13
 0.40
 0.12
 0.36
 
            
AVERAGE BALANCES           
Loans and loans held for sale $1,936,109
 $1,986,482
 $1,192,103
 $918,959
 $793,505
 
Investment securities 447,775
 357,054
 165,796
 143,727
 147,323
 
Total assets 2,719,658
 2,709,138
 1,581,687
 1,227,230
 1,118,527
 
Deposits 2,146,852
 2,146,984
 1,296,763
 983,772
 935,469
 
Shareholders’ equity 318,805
 301,443
 170,675
 135,687
 129,853
 
Number of common shares - basic 25,592,731
 24,763,522
 15,283,437
 13,445,122
 13,420,599
 
Number of common shares - diluted 25,822,085
 25,186,680
 15,663,865
 13,641,882
 13,531,952
 
            
AT PERIOD END           
Total loans $1,935,326
 $2,016,549
 $1,886,134
 $1,039,713
 $817,002
 
Investment securities 449,117
 347,705
 346,221
 133,437
 145,743
 
Total assets 2,891,421
 2,727,543
 2,638,780
 1,314,859
 1,229,392
 
Deposits 2,450,665
 2,237,580
 2,262,218
 1,105,845
 1,081,153
 
Shareholders’ equity 308,425
 303,658
 287,992
 140,929
 131,235
 
Number of common shares outstanding 25,712,909
 25,093,135
 24,425,546
 13,453,820
 13,426,489
 
            
(1) First Security’s results are included in Atlantic Capital’s consolidated results beginning on October 31, 2015, the acquisition date. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

AVERAGE BALANCES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

$

1,769,613

 

$

1,977,014

 

$

1,936,109

 

$

1,986,482

 

$

1,192,103

Investment securities

 

 

372,556

 

 

455,099

 

 

447,775

 

 

357,054

 

 

165,796

Total assets

 

 

2,586,428

 

 

2,780,571

 

 

2,719,658

 

 

2,709,138

 

 

1,581,687

Deposits

 

 

1,844,553

 

 

2,238,292

 

 

2,146,852

 

 

2,146,984

 

 

1,296,763

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

330,216

 

 

315,253

 

 

318,805

 

 

301,443

 

 

170,675

Number of common shares - basic

 

 

23,315,562

 

 

25,947,038

 

 

25,592,731

 

 

24,763,522

 

 

15,283,437

Number of common shares - diluted

 

 

23,478,001

 

 

26,111,755

 

 

25,822,085

 

 

25,186,680

 

 

15,663,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AT PERIOD END

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

$

1,873,894

 

$

2,106,992

 

$

1,935,326

 

$

2,016,549

 

$

1,886,134

Investment securities

 

 

399,433

 

 

402,486

 

 

449,117

 

 

347,705

 

 

346,221

Total assets

 

 

2,910,379

 

 

2,955,440

 

 

2,891,421

 

 

2,727,543

 

 

2,638,780

Deposits

 

 

2,499,046

 

 

2,537,943

 

 

2,450,665

 

 

2,237,580

 

 

2,262,218

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

326,495

 

 

323,653

 

 

308,425

 

 

303,658

 

 

287,992

Number of common shares outstanding

 

 

21,751,026

 

 

25,290,419

 

 

25,712,909

 

 

25,093,135

 

 

24,425,546


Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Statements included in this annual report include non-GAAP financial measures and should be read along with the accompanying tables, which provide a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures. Atlantic Capital management uses non-GAAP financial measures, including: (i) taxable equivalent interest income; (ii) taxable equivalent net interest income; (iii) taxable equivalent net interest margin;margin – continuing operations; (iv) operating net income; (v) diluted earnings per share – operating; and (vi) interest income after provision for loan losses-taxable equivalent; (v) income before income taxes-taxable equivalent; and (vi) income tax expense-taxableon investment securities – taxable equivalent.

Management believes that non-GAAP financial measures provide a greater understanding of ongoing performance and operations, and enhance comparability with prior periods. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as an alternative to any measure of performance or financial condition as determined in accordance with GAAP, and investors should consider Atlantic Capital’s performance and financial condition as reported under GAAP and all other relevant information when assessing the performance or financial condition of the Company. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools, and investors should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the results or financial condition as reported under GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to non-GAAP financial measures presented by other companies.

40

Non-GAAP Performance Measures Reconciliation       
            
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 
Operating net income reconciliation           
Net income (loss) - GAAP $(3,726) $13,395
 $(1,319) $7,516
 $5,143
 
Merger related expenses, net of income tax 
 1,685
 5,625
 
 
 
Divestiture expenses, net of income tax 
 187
 
 
 
 
Gain on sale of branches, net of income tax 
 (2,385) 
 
 
 
Provision for acquired non PCI FSG loans, net of income tax 
 
 4,153
 
 
 
Revaluation of net deferred tax asset 17,398
 
 
 
 
 
Operating net income $13,672
 $12,882
 $8,459
 $7,516
 $5,143
 
            
Operating diluted earnings per share reconciliation           
Diluted earnings (loss) per share - GAAP $(0.15) $0.53
 $(0.09) $0.55
 $0.38
 
Merger related expenses 
 0.06
 0.63
 
 
 
Net gain on sale of branches 
 (0.08) 
 
 
 
Revaluation of net deferred tax asset 0.68
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share - operating $0.53
 $0.51
 $0.54
 $0.55
 $0.38
 
            
Interest income on investment securities reconciliation           
Interest income on investment securities - GAAP $9,181
 $5,698
 $3,301
 $3,109
 $2,917
 
Taxable equivalent adjustment 906
 484
 63
 39
 29
 
Interest income on investment securities - taxable equivalent $10,087
 $6,182
 $3,364
 $3,148
 $2,946
 
            
Interest income reconciliation           
Interest income - GAAP $96,271
 $88,217
 $48,967
 $36,542
 $32,537
 
Taxable equivalent adjustment 906
 484
 63
 39
 29
 
Interest income - taxable equivalent $97,177
 $88,701
 $49,030
 $36,581
 $32,566
 
            
Net interest income reconciliation           
Net interest income - GAAP $81,142
 $76,708
 $44,044
 $33,093
 $28,922
 
Taxable equivalent adjustment 906
 484
 63
 39
 29
 
Net interest income - taxable equivalent $82,048
 $77,192
 $44,107
 $33,132
 $28,951
 
            
Taxable equivalent net interest margin reconciliation           
Net interest margin - GAAP 3.24
%3.10
%2.98
%2.85
%2.75
%
Impact of taxable equivalent adjustment 0.04
 0.02
 0.01
 0.01
 
 
Net interest margin - taxable equivalent 3.28
%3.12
%2.99
%2.86
%2.75
%

Non-GAAP Performance Measures Reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Operating net income reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) - GAAP

 

$

49,855

 

$

28,532

 

$

(3,726)

 

$

13,395

 

$

(1,319)

 

Merger related expenses, net of income tax

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,685

 

 

5,625

 

Divestiture expenses, net of income tax

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

187

 

 

 —

 

Gain on sale of branches, net of income tax

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,385)

 

 

 —

 

Provision for acquired non PCI FSG loans, net of income tax

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,153

 

Revaluation of net deferred tax asset

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

17,398

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Operating net income

 

$

49,855

 

$

28,532

 

$

13,672

 

$

12,882

 

$

8,459

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating diluted earnings per share reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share - GAAP

 

$

2.12

 

$

1.09

 

$

(0.15)

 

$

0.53

 

$

(0.09)

 

Merger related expenses

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

0.06

 

 

0.63

 

Net gain on sale of branches

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(0.08)

 

 

 —

 

Revaluation of net deferred tax asset

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

0.68

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Diluted earnings per share - operating

 

$

2.12

 

$

1.09

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.51

 

$

0.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income on investment securities reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income on investment securities - GAAP

 

$

9,559

 

$

10,912

 

$

9,181

 

$

5,698

 

$

3,301

 

Taxable equivalent adjustment

 

 

459

 

 

395

 

 

906

 

 

484

 

 

63

 

Interest income on investment securities - taxable equivalent

 

$

10,018

 

$

11,307

 

$

10,087

 

$

6,182

 

$

3,364

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income - GAAP

 

$

105,847

 

$

94,760

 

$

75,818

 

$

63,273

 

$

43,546

 

Taxable equivalent adjustment

 

 

459

 

 

395

 

 

906

 

 

484

 

 

63

 

Interest income - taxable equivalent

 

$

106,306

 

$

95,155

 

$

76,724

 

$

63,757

 

$

43,609

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income - GAAP

 

$

80,864

 

$

76,247

 

$

62,832

 

$

53,719

 

$

38,946

 

Taxable equivalent adjustment

 

 

459

 

 

395

 

 

906

 

 

484

 

 

63

 

Net interest income - taxable equivalent

 

$

81,323

 

$

76,642

 

$

63,738

 

$

54,203

 

$

39,009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable equivalent net interest margin reconciliation - continuing operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest margin - GAAP - continuing operations

 

 

3.52

%  

 

3.48

%  

 

3.03

%  

 

2.74

%  

 

2.75

%  

Impact of taxable equivalent adjustment

 

 

0.06

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.04

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.01

 

Net interest margin - taxable equivalent - continuing operations

 

 

3.58

%  

 

3.50

%  

 

3.07

%  

 

2.76

%  

 

2.76

%  


41

  2017 2016 
(in thousands, except share and per share data) Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter 
INCOME SUMMARY                 
Interest income $25,137
 $24,351
 $24,322
 $22,461
 $22,307
 $22,295
 $22,116
 $21,499
 
Interest expense 4,028
 4,060
 3,833
 3,208
 3,029
 2,941
 2,907
 2,632
 
Net interest income 21,109
 20,291
 20,489
 19,253
 19,278
 19,354
 19,209
 18,867
 
Provision for loan losses 282
 322
 1,980
 634
 2,208
 463
 777
 368
 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 20,827
 19,969
 18,509
 18,619
 17,070
 18,891
 18,432
 18,499
 
Noninterest income 3,568
 3,477
 5,287
 3,857
 4,430
 4,002
 8,880
 4,420
 
Noninterest expense 20,594
 17,504
 17,623
 17,744
 18,775
 17,296
 18,943
 18,266
 
Income before income taxes 3,801
 5,942
 6,173
 4,732
 2,725
 5,597
 8,369
 4,653
 
Income tax expense 19,138
 1,890
 1,844
 1,502
 1,116
 1,889
 3,222
 1,722
 
Net Income $(15,337) $4,052
 $4,329
 $3,230
 $1,609
 $3,708
 $5,147
 $2,931
 
Basic Earnings per share $(0.60) $0.16
 $0.17
 $0.13
 $0.06
 $0.15
 $0.21
 $0.12
 
Diluted earnings per share (0.60) 0.16
 0.17
 0.13
 0.06
 0.15
 0.20
 0.12
 
Book value per share 11.99
 12.63
 12.45
 12.18
 12.10
 12.36
 12.29
 12.05
 
                  
PERFORMANCE MEASURES                 
Return on average equity (18.66)%4.96
%5.48
%4.19
%2.09
%4.84
%6.88
%4.02
%
Return on average assets (2.24) 0.60
 0.63
 0.48
 0.24
 0.55
 0.76
 0.45
 
Taxable equivalent net interest margin 3.39
 3.26
 3.26
 3.20
 3.11
 3.12
 3.12
 3.26
 
Efficiency ratio 83.45
 73.65
 68.37
 76.78
 79.19
 74.05
 67.44
 78.44
 
Equity to assets 10.67
 12.31
 11.82
 11.10
 11.13
 11.17
 10.83
 10.86
 
                  
ASSET QUALITY                 
Allowance for loan losses to loans held for investment 1.00
%0.99
%1.11
%1.05
%1.04
%0.92
%0.95
%0.93
%
Net charge-offs $(192) $3,322
 $49
 $1,290
 $147
 $306
 $8
 $1,665
 
Net charge-offs to average loans (1)
 (0.04)%0.68
%0.01
%0.26
%0.03
%0.06
%
%0.35
%
NPAs to total assets 0.14
 0.23
 0.52
 0.21
 0.13
 0.09
 0.07
 0.08
 
                  
AVERAGE BALANCES                 
Loans $1,898,745
 $1,934,505
 $1,962,374
 $1,949,385
 $2,036,995
 $2,003,180
 $2,000,685
 $1,881,749
 
Investment securities 460,269
 455,868
 455,090
 419,335
 349,762
 335,880
 358,439
 357,728
 
Total assets 2,720,070
 2,701,387
 2,762,389
 2,694,715
 2,722,444
 2,717,996
 2,718,110
 2,620,750
 
Deposits 2,194,849
 2,121,263
 2,158,675
 2,111,992
 2,094,885
 2,163,569
 2,135,292
 2,155,683
 
Shareholders’ equity 326,059
 323,832
 316,825
 308,261
 308,588
 306,642
 299,170
 291,806
 
Number of common shares - basic 25,723,548
 25,699,179
 25,621,910
 25,320,690
 25,027,304
 24,891,822
 24,644,755
 24,485,900
 
Number of common shares - diluted 25,888,064
 25,890,779
 25,831,281
 25,672,286
 25,407,728
 25,260,280
 25,158,694
 24,993,597
 
                  
AT PERIOD END                 
Total loans $1,935,326
 $1,908,706
 $1,963,835
 $1,930,965
 $2,016,549
 $2,054,702
 $1,971,198
 $1,982,054
 
Investment securities 449,117
 447,005
 450,273
 456,942
 347,705
 348,484
 328,370
 366,641
 
Total assets 2,891,421
 2,638,412
 2,702,575
 2,802,078
 2,727,543
 2,761,244
 2,807,822
 2,726,888
 
Deposits 2,450,665
 2,103,645
 2,113,954
 2,203,039
 2,237,580
 2,188,856
 2,158,305
 2,282,462
 
Shareholders’ equity 308,425
 324,754
 319,435
 310,967
 303,658
 308,463
 304,066
 296,015
 
Number of common shares outstanding 25,712,909
 25,716,418
 25,654,521
 25,535,013
 25,093,135
 24,950,099
 24,750,163
 24,569,823
 
                  
(1)  Annualized.

ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

  

Fourth Quarter

  

Third Quarter

  

Second Quarter

  

First Quarter

  

Fourth Quarter

  

Third Quarter

  

Second Quarter

  

First Quarter

 

INCOME SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

$

26,532

 

$

26,520

 

$

26,598

 

$

26,197

 

$

26,628

 

$

24,017

 

$

22,836

 

$

21,279

 

Interest expense

 

 

5,965

 

 

6,536

 

 

6,709

 

 

5,773

 

 

5,560

 

 

4,720

 

 

4,392

 

 

3,841

 

Net interest income

 

 

20,567

 

 

19,984

 

 

19,889

 

 

20,424

 

 

21,068

 

 

19,297

 

 

18,444

 

 

17,438

 

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 

 

787

 

 

413

 

 

698

 

 

814

 

 

502

 

 

845

 

 

(173)

 

 

772

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

 

19,780

 

 

19,571

 

 

19,191

 

 

19,610

 

 

20,566

 

 

18,452

 

 

18,617

 

 

16,666

 

Noninterest income

 

 

2,679

 

 

2,769

 

 

2,941

 

 

2,336

 

 

164

 

 

2,255

 

 

4,466

 

 

3,162

 

Noninterest expense

 

 

13,382

 

 

12,677

 

 

13,254

 

 

13,795

 

 

12,208

 

 

11,872

 

 

12,623

 

 

13,288

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

9,077

 

 

9,663

 

 

8,878

 

 

8,151

 

 

8,522

 

 

8,835

 

 

10,460

 

 

6,540

 

Income tax expense

 

 

1,937

 

 

2,094

 

 

1,869

 

 

1,711

 

 

1,039

 

 

1,837

 

 

2,082

 

 

1,349

 

Net income from continuing operations

 

 

7,140

 

 

7,569

 

 

7,009

 

 

6,440

 

 

7,483

 

 

6,998

 

 

8,378

 

 

5,191

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 —

 

 

617

 

 

22,143

 

 

(1,063)

 

 

1,347

 

 

(485)

 

 

(227)

 

 

(153)

 

Net income

 

$

7,140

 

$

8,186

 

$

29,152

 

$

5,377

 

$

8,830

 

$

6,513

 

$

8,151

 

$

5,038

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PER SHARE DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share - continuing operations

 

$

0.33

 

$

0.33

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.20

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share - discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

0.03

 

 

0.93

 

 

(0.04)

 

 

0.05

 

 

(0.02)

 

 

(0.01)

 

 

(0.01)

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

0.33

 

$

0.36

 

$

1.22

 

$

0.22

 

$

0.34

 

$

0.25

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share - continuing operations

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.33

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.20

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share - discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

0.03

 

 

0.92

 

 

(0.04)

 

 

0.05

 

 

(0.02)

 

 

(0.01)

 

 

(0.01)

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.36

 

$

1.21

 

$

0.21

 

$

0.34

 

$

0.25

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.19

 

Book value per share

 

 

15.01

 

 

14.81

 

 

14.46

 

 

13.10

 

 

12.80

 

 

12.27

 

 

12.14

 

 

11.91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average equity

 

 

8.65

 

9.77

 

34.38

 

6.80

 

10.90

 

8.07

 

10.46

 

6.66

%

Return on average assets

 

 

1.08

 

 

1.32

 

 

4.79

 

 

0.77

 

 

1.21

 

 

0.92

 

 

1.20

 

 

0.76

 

Taxable equivalent net interest margin - continuing operations

 

 

3.38

 

 

3.52

 

 

3.61

 

 

3.74

 

 

3.66

 

 

3.48

 

 

3.51

 

 

3.39

 

Efficiency ratio - continuing operations

 

 

57.57

 

 

55.72

 

 

58.06

 

 

60.61

 

 

57.50

 

 

55.09

 

 

55.10

 

 

64.50

 

Equity to assets

 

 

11.22

 

 

13.64

 

 

14.09

 

 

11.23

 

 

10.95

 

 

11.11

 

 

11.77

 

 

11.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSET QUALITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses to loans held for investment (2)

 

 

0.99

%  

 

0.98

%  

 

1.02

%  

 

1.04

%  

 

1.03

%  

 

1.00

%  

 

1.01

%  

 

1.01

Net charge-offs

 

$

332

 

$

519

 

$

619

 

$

558

 

$

(3)

 

$

(15)

 

$

129

 

$

231

 

Net charge-offs to average loans (3)

 

 

0.07

%  

 

0.11

%  

 

0.14

%  

 

0.11

%  

 

 —

%  

 

 —

%  

 

0.03

%  

 

0.05

NPAs to total assets

 

 

0.26

 

 

0.29

 

 

0.31

 

 

0.40

 

 

0.20

 

 

0.13

 

 

0.14

 

 

0.13

 

AVERAGE BALANCES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

$

1,857,736

 

$

1,801,629

 

$

1,800,001

 

$

2,089,465

 

$

2,076,853

 

$

1,963,817

 

$

1,927,063

 

$

1,938,953

 

Investment securities

 

 

389,667

 

 

340,872

 

 

360,047

 

 

400,101

 

 

450,465

 

 

461,348

 

 

454,634

 

 

453,917

 

Total assets

 

 

2,626,388

 

 

2,453,438

 

 

2,440,502

 

 

2,829,072

 

 

2,891,327

 

 

2,805,740

 

 

2,718,071

 

 

2,704,822

 

Deposits

 

 

2,146,626

 

 

1,949,657

 

 

1,947,426

 

 

2,387,104

 

 

2,380,861

 

 

2,254,072

 

 

2,135,825

 

 

2,153,885

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

327,543

 

 

332,291

 

 

340,119

 

 

320,812

 

 

321,348

 

 

320,090

 

 

312,543

 

 

306,821

 

Number of common shares - basic

 

 

21,876,487

 

 

22,681,904

 

 

23,888,381

 

 

24,855,171

 

 

25,919,445

 

 

26,103,397

 

 

26,010,914

 

 

25,750,824

 

Number of common shares - diluted

 

 

22,053,907

 

 

22,837,531

 

 

24,040,806

 

 

25,019,384

 

 

26,043,799

 

 

26,254,772

 

 

26,200,026

 

 

25,945,773

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AT PERIOD END

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans and loans held for sale

 

$

1,873,894

 

$

1,836,589

 

$

1,789,740

 

$

2,120,866

 

$

2,106,992

 

$

2,040,320

 

$

1,935,923

 

$

1,960,256

 

Investment securities

 

 

399,433

 

 

329,648

 

 

348,723

 

 

402,640

 

 

402,486

 

 

465,756

 

 

453,968

 

 

458,730

 

Total assets

 

 

2,910,379

 

 

2,410,198

 

 

2,389,680

 

 

2,855,887

 

 

2,955,440

 

 

2,882,721

 

 

2,690,674

 

 

2,718,665

 

Deposits

 

 

2,499,046

 

 

1,854,272

 

 

1,851,531

 

 

2,440,448

 

 

2,544,163

 

 

2,379,824

 

 

2,066,587

 

 

2,096,300

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

326,495

 

 

328,711

 

 

336,715

 

 

320,627

 

 

323,653

 

 

320,237

 

 

316,770

 

 

307,059

 

Number of common shares outstanding

 

 

21,751,026

 

 

22,193,761

 

 

23,293,465

 

 

24,466,964

 

 

25,290,419

 

 

26,103,666

 

 

26,102,217

 

 

25,772,208

 



(1)

On April 5, 2019, the Bank sold its Tennessee and northwest Georgia banking operations, including 14 branches and the mortgage business. The banking business and branches that were sold to FirstBank are reported as discontinued operations. Discontinued operations have been reported retrospectively for all prior periods presented.

(2)

The fourth quarter 2018 ratio is calculated on a continuing operations basis. Prior period ratios have not been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of discontinued operations.

(3)

Annualized.

42

Non-GAAP Performance Measures Reconciliation 
                  
  2017 2016 
(in thousands, except per share data) Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter 
Operating net income reconciliation                 
Net income (loss) - GAAP $(15,337) $4,052
 $4,329
 $3,230
 $1,609
 $3,708
 $5,147
 $2,931
 
Merger related expenses, net of income tax 
 
 
 
 126
 356
 743
 460
 
Divestiture expenses, net of income tax 
 
 
 
 
 
 187
 
 
Gain on sale of branches, net of income tax 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,385) 
 
Revaluation of net deferred tax asset 17,398
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating net income $2,061
 $4,052
 $4,329
 $3,230
 $1,735
 $4,064
 $3,692
 $3,391
 
                  
Operating diluted earnings per share reconciliation                 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share - GAAP $(0.60) $0.16
 $0.17
 $0.13
 $0.06
 $0.15
 $0.20
 $0.12
 
Merger related expenses 
 
 
 
 0.01
 0.01
 0.03
 0.02
 
Net gain on sale of branches 
 
 
 
 
 
 (0.08) 
 
Revaluation of net deferred tax asset 0.68
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share - operating $0.08
 $0.16
 $0.17
 $0.13
 $0.07
 $0.16
 $0.15
 $0.14
 
                  
Interest income on investment securities reconciliation                 
Interest income on investment securities - GAAP $2,510
 $2,298
 $2,355
 $2,018
 $1,477
 $1,293
 $1,327
 $1,601
 
Taxable equivalent adjustment 213
 215
 223
 255
 223
 133
 74
 54
 
Interest income on investment securities - taxable equivalent $2,723
 $2,513
 $2,578
 $2,273
 $1,700
 $1,426
 $1,401
 $1,655
 
                  
Interest income reconciliation                 
Interest income - GAAP $25,137
 $24,351
 $24,322
 $22,461
 $22,307
 $22,295
 $22,116
 $21,499
 
Taxable equivalent adjustment 213
 215
 223
 255
 223
 133
 74
 54
 
Interest income - taxable equivalent $25,350
 $24,566
 $24,545
 $22,716
 $22,530
 $22,428
 $22,190
 $21,553
 
                  
Net interest income reconciliation                 
Net interest income - GAAP $21,109
 $20,291
 $20,489
 $19,253
 $19,278
 $19,354
 $19,209
 $18,867
 
Taxable equivalent adjustment 213
 215
 223
 255
 223
 133
 74
 54
 
Net interest income - taxable equivalent $21,322
 $20,506
 $20,712
 $19,508
 $19,501
 $19,487
 $19,283
 $18,921
 
                  
Taxable equivalent net interest margin reconciliation                 
Net interest margin - GAAP 3.35
%3.23
%3.23
%3.16
%3.07
%3.10
%3.11
%3.25
%
Impact of taxable equivalent adjustment 0.04
 0.03
 0.03
 0.04
 0.04
 0.02
 0.01
 0.01
 
Net interest margin - taxable equivalent 3.39
%3.26
%3.26
%3.20
%3.11
%3.12
%3.12
%3.26
%

Non-GAAP Performance Measures Reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

   

Fourth Quarter

   

Third Quarter

   

Second Quarter

   

First Quarter

   

Fourth Quarter

   

Third Quarter

   

Second Quarter

   

First Quarter

 

Interest income on investment securities reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income on investment securities - GAAP

 

$

2,413

 

$

2,176

 

$

2,339

 

$

2,631

 

$

2,844

 

$

2,789

 

$

2,687

 

$

2,592

 

Taxable equivalent adjustment

 

 

167

 

 

104

 

 

88

 

 

100

 

 

97

 

 

97

 

 

98

 

 

103

 

Interest income on investment securities - taxable equivalent

 

$

2,580

 

$

2,280

 

$

2,427

 

$

2,731

 

$

2,941

 

$

2,886

 

$

2,785

 

$

2,695

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable equivalent interest income reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income - GAAP

 

$

26,532

 

$

26,520

 

$

26,598

 

$

26,197

 

$

26,628

 

$

24,017

 

$

22,836

 

$

21,279

 

Taxable equivalent adjustment

 

 

167

 

 

104

 

 

88

 

 

100

 

 

97

 

 

97

 

 

98

 

 

103

 

Interest income - taxable equivalent

 

$

26,699

 

$

26,624

 

$

26,686

 

$

26,297

 

$

26,725

 

$

24,114

 

$

22,934

 

$

21,382

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable equivalent net interest income reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income - GAAP

 

$

20,567

 

$

19,984

 

$

19,889

 

$

20,424

 

$

21,068

 

$

19,297

 

$

18,444

 

$

17,438

 

Taxable equivalent adjustment

 

 

167

 

 

104

 

 

88

 

 

100

 

 

97

 

 

97

 

 

98

 

 

103

 

Net interest income - taxable equivalent

 

$

20,734

 

$

20,088

 

$

19,977

 

$

20,524

 

$

21,165

 

$

19,394

 

$

18,542

 

$

17,541

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable equivalent net interest margin reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest margin - GAAP

 

 

3.35

 

3.51

 

3.60

 

3.72

 

3.64

 

3.46

 

3.49

 

3.37

Impact of taxable equivalent adjustment

 

 

0.03

 

 

0.01

 

 

0.01

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.02

 

Net interest margin - taxable equivalent

 

 

3.38

 

3.52

 

3.61

 

3.74

 

3.66

 

3.48

 

3.51

 

3.39




ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s discussion and analysis of earningsfinancial condition and related financial dataresults of operations (“MD&A”) is presented to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries. This discussion and analysisMD&A should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Although certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform to statement presentations for 2017, the reclassifications have no material effect on shareholders’ equity or net income as previously reported. Unless otherwise noted, for purposes ofwhen we refer to “Atlantic Capital,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” in this section, “Atlantic Capital” refersreport, we are referring to the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations for Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW AND EARNINGS SUMMARY

On October 31, 2015, Atlantic CapitalApril 5, 2019, the Bank completed the acquisitionpreviously disclosed sale of First Securityall 14 of its bank branches located in Tennessee and northwest Georgia, including its wholly-owned bank subsidiary FSGBank.mortgage banking business, to FirstBank (the “Branch Sale”). In connection with the Branch Sale, FirstBank assumed deposits and customer repurchase agreements of approximately $598 million and purchased approximately $385 million in loans. FirstBank paid a deposit premium equal to 6.25% of the balance of assumed deposits, less a discount of 0.68% of purchased loans. The acquired entity’s resultsincome and expenses related to these branches are included in Atlantic Capital’s consolidated results beginningdiscontinued operations and prior period financial information has been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of discontinued operations. Prior periods’ financial information covering income and expense amounts in this MD&A has been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The financial information for prior periods included in this MD&A also reflects the reclassification of assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations to held for sale. Net income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 included a gain on October 31, 2015, the acquisition date.

sale of branches of $34.5 million and divestiture expenses of $5.1 million. 

Atlantic Capital reported a net lossincome from continuing operations of $3.7$28.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This2019 compared to  net income of $13.4$28.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Diluted income per common share from continuing operations was ($0.15)$1.20 for 2017,2019, compared to $0.53$1.07 for 2016.

The decrease in2018. 

A net incomeloss from continuing operations of $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 comparedincreased $32.8 million to 2016net income from continuing operations of $28.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The loss in 2017 was primarily the result of a  $16.4$17.4 million or 207%, increase in provision for income taxes. This was due to a reduction in the value of Atlantic Capital’s net deferred tax asset as a result of the tax reform legislation signed into law on December 22, 2017. In addition, noninterest income decreased $5.5 million, or 26%, from 2016 to 2017, primarily duerelated to the $3.9 million gain on the sale2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

43

Net interest income afterbefore provision for loan losses resulting primarily from a $4.1increased $4.6 million, or 5%6.1%, from 2018 to 2019, primarily due to a $12.9 million, or 16.1%, increase in interest and fee income on loans, partially offset by a $7.9 million, or 63.1%, increase in interest on deposits. Net interest income before provision for loan losses increased $13.4 million, or 21.4%, from 2017 to 2018, primarily due to a $15.7 million, or 24.3%, increase in interest and fee income on loans, and a $3.5$1.2 million, or 61%12.1%, increase in interest on investment securities available-for-sale.

Atlantic Capital reportedavailable-for-sale (taxable equivalent).

Taxable equivalent net interest income of $13.4from continuing operations was $81.3 million or $0.53 per diluted share,for 2019, compared to $76.6 million for 2018. Taxable equivalent net interest margin from continuing operations increased to 3.58% for the year ended December 31, 20162019, from 3.50% for 2018. The margin increase was primarily due to increases in loan yields and a higher average Federal Funds rate during the first half of 2019.

Taxable equivalent net interest income from continuing operations was $76.6 million for 2018, compared to a$63.7 million for 2017. Taxable equivalent net loss of $1.3 million, or ($0.09) per diluted common shareinterest margin from continuing operations  increased to 3.50% for the year ended December 31, 2015. The $14.7 million increase in net income2018, from 2015 to 2016 was primarily the result of a $32.7 million, or 74%, increase in net interest income before provision3.07% for loan losses, as well as a $4.2 million, or 53%, decrease in the provision for loan losses. During the fourth quarter of 2015, Atlantic Capital recorded a loan loss provision related to the acquired First Security loan portfolio in the amount of $6.8 million. In addition, noninterest income increased $12.3 million, or 131%, from 2015 to 2016, due to the $3.9 million gain on the sale of seven branches, increased service charges and higher trust and mortgage income due to the acquisition of First Security. This was offset by a $27.3 million, or 60%, increase in noninterest expense, resulting primarily from a $24.1 million increase in salary and benefits, occupancy, equipment and software, and data processing expenses related to the acquisition of First Security.

Taxable equivalent net interest income was $82.0 million for 2017, compared to $77.2 million for 2016. Taxable equivalent net interest margin increased to 3.28% for the year ended December 31, 2017, from 3.12% for 2016.2017. The margin increase was primarily due to increases in the FedFederal Funds rate.
Taxable equivalent net interest income increased $33.1 million, or 75%,

Provision for loan losses from $44.1 million for 2015, to $77.2 million for 2016. Net interest margin increased from 2.99%continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 20152019 totaled $2.7 million, an increase of $766,000, or 39.4%, from the year ended December 31, 2018, due to 3.12%higher net charge-offs and specific reserve impairments.  For the years ended December 31, 2017 to 2018, provision expense decreased by $1.3 million from $3.2 million to $1.9 million, primarily related to lower net charge-offs. The Company also recorded negative provision for 2016. The margin increase wasloan losses in 2018 totaling $3.1 million included in discontinued operations, primarily due to higher yields onthe classification of $373 million of loans andto held for sale in connection with the increase in loan volumeBranch Sale.

Noninterest income from First Security.

Provision for loan lossescontinuing operations increased $678,000, or 6.7%, to $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $3.2 million, a decrease of $598,0002019 from the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease2018. This was primarily relateddue to an increase in gains on sales of securities of $2.8 million; largely resulting from the $1.9 million loss in the fourth quarter of 2018 on the sale of $63 million in investment securities. The proceeds from the securities sale were used to help fund the cash payout for the Branch Sale that closed in the second quarter of 2019. Additionally, SBA lending activities increased  $572,000 from 2018 to 2019. These increases were partially offset by a reduction$1.7 million net gain on the sale of Southeastern Trust Company in loan growth. Provision expense decreased by $4.22018 and the resulting loss of trust income of $1.0 million from $8.0the prior year.

Noninterest income from continuing operations decreased $2.1 million, in 2015or 17.5%, to $3.8$10.0 million in 2016.for the year ended December 31, 2018 from the year ended December 31, 2017.  The decrease was primarily due to a $6.8loss of $1.9 million provision recordedon the sale of $63 million in investment securities to help fund the cash owed to the buyer at the closing of the Branch Sale, which occurred during the second quarter of 2019.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, noninterest expense from continuing operations increased $3.1 million, or 6.2%, compared to 2018.  This increase was mainly driven by higher salary and employee benefits expense of $34.5 million, up  $2.8 million, or 8.7%, from December 31, 2018, which was primarily the result of the full impact of new hires in 2019 and higher incentive  and medical insurance expense. Communications and data processing expense increased $523,000, or 19.5%, from 2018 to 2019 due to a higher volume of transactions in the fourth quarter of 2015payments business, as well as non-recurring charges related to vendor negotiations and contract terminations. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline in FDIC premium expense of $345,000, or 61.4%, compared to 2018 due to the acquired First Security loan portfolio.

FDIC assessment credit received in 2019.

Noninterest income decreased $5.5 million, or 26%, to $16.2expense from continuing operations totaled $50.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $52.8 million in 2017, from the year ended December 31, 2016. Thea decrease was primarily due to the $3.9 million gain on the sale of seven branches in 2016, and a $1.4$2.8 million, or 94%, decrease in TriNet lending activities due to Atlantic Capital’s decision to close the TriNet Lending division during the third quarter of 2016.



Noninterest income increased by $12.3 million, or 131%, from $9.4 million in 2015 to $21.7 million in 2016. The increase was primarily due to a $2.9 million increase in service charges due to the addition of First Security deposits, the $3.9 million gain on the sale of seven branches, as well as $1.5 million in gains related to the sale of TriNet loans. Two new lines of business resulting from the merger - mortgage banking and trust - contributed an additional $1.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, during 2016, compared to 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, noninterest expense increased $185,000, or less than 1%, compared to the same period of 2016.5.4%. Salary and benefits expense increased $3.1decreased $1.4 million, or 7%4.1%, in 20172018 due to severance costs and $2.0 million in expenses related to the President and Chief Operating Officer’s resignation.resignation in 2017. Additionally, professional services expense increased $1.8decreased $1.1 million, or 63%23.5%, from 2017 to 2018, primarily due to expenses related to the publicregistered offering of common stock by a selling stockholder completed during the third quarterin 2017.

44

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting policies of Atlantic Capital are in accordance with GAAP and conform to general practices within the banking industry. Atlantic Capital’s financial position and results of operations are affected by management’s application of accounting policies, including judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues, expenses and related disclosures. Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in Atlantic Capital’s consolidated financial position and/or consolidated results of operations. The more critical accounting and reporting policies include Atlantic Capital’s accounting for the allowance for loan losses, fair value measurements, and income tax related items. Significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 - Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation to the consolidated financial statements.

The following is a summary of Atlantic Capital’s critical accounting policies that are material to the consolidated financial statements and are highly dependent on estimates and assumptions.

Allowance for loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in Atlantic Capital’s loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. Atlantic Capital determines the allowance for loan losses based on an ongoing estimation process. This estimation process is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates, including the amounts and timing of cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans and losses incurred as of the balance sheet date in Atlantic Capital’s loan portfolio. Those estimates may be susceptible to significant change. Increases to the allowance for loan losses are made by charges to the provision for loan losses. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

The allowance is the accumulation of various components that are calculated based on an independent estimation process. All components of the allowance for loan losses represent estimates based on data that management believes are most reflective of the underlying credit losses being estimated. This evaluation includes credit quality trends, peer analysis, recent loan loss experience, collateral type, loan volumes, seasoning of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, and the findings of internal credit quality assessments and results from external bank regulatory examinations.

While management uses the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments may become necessary if conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the estimates. In addition, regulatory examiners may require adjustments to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Such adjustments to original estimates, as necessary, are made and reflected in the financial results in the period in which these factors and other relevant considerations indicate that loss levels may vary from previous estimates.

Management continuously monitors and actively manages the credit quality of the entire loan portfolio and recognizes provision expense to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level. Specific allowances for impaired loans are determined by analyzing estimated cash flows discounted at a loan’s original rate or collateral values in situations where Atlantic Capital believes repayment is dependent on collateral liquidation.

Management considers the established ALL adequate to absorb losses that relate to loans outstanding at December 31, 2017,2019, although future additions may be necessary based on changes indeteriorated economic conditions, reduced collateral values, erosion of the borrower’s



access to liquidity and other factors. If the financial condition of borrowers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, Atlantic Capital’s estimates would be updated and additions to the ALL may be required.

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance related to credit losses on financial instruments. This update, commonly referred to as the current expected credit losses methodology (“CECL”), changes the accounting for credit losses on loans and debt securities. Under the new guidance, the Company’s measurement of expected credit losses is based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. This new guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2020.

45

Due to this change in methodology, the Company anticipates a smaller allowance requirement for its shorter-lived commercial portfolio, offset by an increase in its reserve for unfunded commitments, which is recorded in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Based upon the Company’s loan portfolio composition at December 31, 2019, the current economic environment, and management’s current forecast and qualitative adjustment assumptions, the overall impact to retained earnings is not material upon adoption of the standard.

Fair value measurements.

Atlantic Capital’s impaired loans and foreclosed assets may be measured and carried at fair value, the determination of which requires management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments. See Note 18  - Fair Value Measurements into the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosures regarding the fair value of our assets and liabilities.

When a loan is considered individually impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. In addition, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost, fair value, less cost to sell, or listed selling price less cost to sell, following foreclosure. Fair value is defined by GAAP as “the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” GAAP further defines an “orderly transaction” as “a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets. It is not a forced transaction (for example, a forced liquidation or distress sale).” Although management believes its processes for determining the value of impaired loans and foreclosed properties are appropriate and allow Atlantic Capital to arrive at a fair value, the processes require management judgment and assumptions and the value of such assets at the time they are revalued or divested may be significantly different from management’s determination of fair value. In addition, because of subjectivity in fair value determinations, there may be grounds for differences in opinions, which may result in disagreements between management and Atlantic Capital Bank’sour regulators, disagreements which could cause Atlantic Capital Bankus to change itsour judgments about fair value.

The fair values for available-for-sale securities are generally based upon quoted market prices or observable market prices for similar instruments. Atlantic Capital utilizes a third-party pricing service to assist with determining the fair value of its securities portfolio. The pricing service uses observable inputs when available including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids and offers. These values take into account recent market activity as well as other market observable data such as interest rate, spread and prepayment information. When market observable data is not available, which generally occurs due to the lack of liquidity for certain securities, the valuation of the security is subjective and may involve substantial judgment by management. Atlantic Capital periodically reviews available-for-sale securities that are in an unrealized loss position to determine whether other-than-temporary impairment exists. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost-basis. The primary factors Atlantic Capital considers in determining whether impairment is other-than-temporary are long term expectations andchanges in interest rates, the financial condition of the borrower, recent experience regarding principal and interest payments, and Atlantic Capital’s ability and intent to hold the security until the amortized cost basis is recovered.

Atlantic Capital uses derivatives primarily to manage interest rate risk. The fair values of derivative financial instruments are determined based on quoted market prices, dealer quotes and pricing models that are primarily sensitive to observable market observable data.

Income taxes.

taxes.

Atlantic Capital recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies by jurisdiction and entity in making this assessment.

46

Regulatory risk-based capital rules limit the amount of deferred tax assets that a bank or bank holding company can include in Tier 1 capital. Generally, deferred tax assets that arise from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, net of any related valuation allowances and net of deferred tax liabilities, are excluded from CET1 and Tier 1 capital. Deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks, net of related valuation allowances and net of deferred tax liabilities, that exceed certain thresholds are excluded from CET1 and Tier 1 capital.




RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

Taxable equivalent net interest income from continuing operations for 2017the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled $82.0$81.3 million, a $4.9$4.7 million, or 6%6.1%, increase from 2016.2018. This increase was primarily driven by an $8.5$11.2 million, or 10%11.7%, increase in taxable equivalent interest income.income from continuing operations. The interest income increase primarily resulted from the following:

·

a $12.9 million, or 16.1%, increase to $93.0 million in interest income on loans, resulting from an increase in average loan balances and higher yields; partially offset by

a $3.9 million, or 63%, increase

·

a $1.3 million, or 11.4%, decrease to $10.0 million in taxable equivalent interest income on investment securities, resulting from an $82.5 million decrease in investment securities average balances

Due to $10.1the $167 million in taxable equivalent interest income on investment securities, resulting from a $90.7 million, or 25%, increase in average balance, due primarilycash paid to the increased investment in non-taxable investment securities;buyer at the closing of the Branch Sale, Atlantic Capital restructured the balance sheet following the transaction with a combination of excess cash, proceeds from sold securities, Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings, and

a $4.1 million, or 5%, increase in interest income on loans, resulting from increases in the Fed Funds rate.
brokered deposits.

Interest expense from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 20172019 totaled $15.1$25.0 million, a $3.6$6.5 million, or 31%34.9%, increase from 2016,2018, primarily due to a $2.7$7.9 million, or 36%63.1%, increase in interest paid on deposits. The rate paid on deposits from continuing operations increased 54 basis points, and the rate paid on total interest bearing liabilities from continuing operations increased 2445 basis points from 20162018 to 2017,2019, both driven by an increase in the average Federal Funds rate in 2017 and 2018.

Taxable equivalent net interest rates on deposits and other borrowings resultingmargin from increases in the Fed Funds rate. In addition, premium amortization on acquired time deposits reduced interest expensecontinuing operations increased to 3.58% from 3.50% for the year ended December 31, 2017 in the amount of $352,000, compared to $853,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Taxable equivalent net interest margin increased to 3.28% from 3.12% for the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The primary reasonsreason for the increase in taxable equivalent net interest margin for 20172019 compared to 2016 were2018 was the higher interest rates on loans resulting from FedFederal Funds rate increases. Net accretion income on acquired loans discount totaled $2.4 million$392,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, compared to $2.6$1.4 million for the same period in 2016.
Overall funding costs increased gradually from 2016 to 2017 due to Fed Funds rate increases and remained relatively stable from 2015 to 2016. However, the long-term debt issued in September of 2015 added a relatively high cost funding source to the balance sheet.
2018.

Taxable equivalent net interest income from continuing operations increased $33.1$12.9 million, or 75%20.2%, from $44.1$63.7 million in 20152017 to $77.2$76.6 million in 2016.2018. Taxable equivalent net interest margin was 3.12%increased to 3.50% in 2016 compared to 2.99%2018 from 3.07% in 2015,2017, primarily due to higher average loan balances from the First Security acquisition.



Federal Funds rate increases and increased yields on loans and investment securities.

The following table presents information regarding average balances for assets and liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing the income or expense by the average balances for assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Loan fees are included in interest income on loans.

47

Table 1 - Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis
(Dollars in thousands; taxable equivalent)                
   Twelve months ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015

 Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Yield/Rate Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Yield/Rate Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Yield/Rate
Assets                  
Interest bearing deposits in other banks $85,525
 $916
 1.07% $92,744
 $583
 0.63% $65,093
 $263
 0.40%
Other short-term investments 14,266
 270
 1.89% 23,134
 318
 1.37% 49,014
 652
 1.33%
Investment securities:                  
    Taxable investment securities 366,309
 7,221
 1.97% 310,815
 4,755
 1.53% 161,597
 3,179
 1.97%
    Non-taxable investment securities(1)
 81,466
 2,866
 3.52% 46,239
 1,427
 3.09% 4,199
 185
 4.41%
Total investment securities 447,775
 10,087
 2.25% 357,054
 6,182
 1.73% 165,796
 3,364
 2.03%
Total loans 1,936,109
 84,889
 4.38% 1,986,482
 80,781
 4.07% 1,192,103
 44,562
 3.74%
FHLB and FRB stock 18,528
 1,015
 5.48% 15,617
 837
 5.36% 4,338
 189
 4.36%
     Total interest-earning assets 2,502,203
 97,177
 3.88% 2,475,031
 88,701
 3.58% 1,476,344
 49,030
 3.32%
Non-earning assets 217,455
     234,107
     105,343
    
     Total assets $2,719,658
     $2,709,138
     $1,581,687
    
Liabilities                  
Interest bearing deposits:                  
NOW, money market, and savings 1,197,771
 6,983
 0.58% 1,170,879
 4,889
 0.42% 745,777
 2,840
 0.38%
Time deposits 149,350
 1,134
 0.76% 208,800
 936
 0.45% 58,133
 150
 0.26%
Internet and brokered deposits 168,685
 1,960
 1.16% 207,543
 1,574
 0.76% 140,416
 628
 0.45%
Total interest-bearing deposits 1,515,806
 10,077
 0.66% 1,587,222
 7,399
 0.47% 944,326
 3,618
 0.38%
Total borrowings 175,060
 1,758
 1.00% 176,122
 825
 0.47% 84,196
 447
 0.53%
Total long-term debt 49,444
 3,294
 6.66% 49,275
 3,285
 6.67% 12,805
 858
 6.70%
     Total interest-bearing liabilities 1,740,310
 15,129
 0.87% 1,812,619
 11,509
 0.63% 1,041,327
 4,923
 0.47%
Demand deposits 631,046
     559,762
     352,437
    
Other liabilities 29,497
     35,314
     17,248
    
Shareholders' equity 318,805
     301,443
     170,675
    
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $2,719,658
     $2,709,138
     $1,581,687
    
Net interest spread     3.01%     2.95%     2.85%
Net interest income and net interest margin (taxable equivalent)(2)
   $82,048
 3.28%   $77,192
 3.12%   $44,107
 2.99%
                   
(1) Interest income on tax-exempt securities has been increased to reflect comparable interest on taxable securities. The rate used was 35%, reflecting the statutory federal income tax rate.
(2) Taxable equivalent net interest income divided by total interest-earning assets using the appropriate day count convention based on the type of interest-earning asset. For a reconciliation of Non-GAAP financial measures, see Item 6. Selected Financial Data - Non-GAAP Performance Measures Reconciliation.

Table 1 - Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis(1)

(Dollars in thousands; taxable equivalent)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Income/

 

Yield/

 

Average

 

Income/

 

Yield/

 

Average

 

Income/

 

Yield/

 

 

   

Balance

   

Expense

   

Rate

   

Balance

   

Expense

   

Rate

   

Balance

   

Expense

   

Rate

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest bearing deposits in other banks

 

$

110,543

 

$

2,209

 

2.00

$

104,145

 

$

2,244

 

2.15

$

85,525

 

$

916

 

1.07

Other short-term investments

 

 

3,875

 

 

118

 

3.05

 

15,210

 

 

426

 

2.80

 

14,266

 

 

270

 

1.89

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

Taxable investment securities

 

 

274,189

 

 

7,188

 

2.62

 

379,035

 

 

9,005

 

2.38

 

366,309

 

 

7,221

 

1.97

Non-taxable investment securities(2)

 

 

98,367

 

 

2,830

 

2.88

 

76,064

 

 

2,302

 

3.03

 

81,466

 

 

2,866

 

3.52

Total investment securities

 

 

372,556

 

 

10,018

 

2.69

 

455,099

 

 

11,307

 

2.48

 

447,775

 

 

10,087

 

2.25

Loans - continuing operations

 

 

1,769,613

 

 

93,022

 

5.26

 

1,600,257

 

 

80,110

 

5.01

 

1,507,453

 

 

64,436

 

4.27

FHLB and FRB stock

 

 

14,156

 

 

939

 

6.63

 

17,710

 

 

1,068

 

6.03

 

18,528

 

 

1,015

 

5.48

Total interest-earning assets - continuing operations

 

 

2,270,743

 

 

106,306

 

4.68

 

2,192,421

 

 

95,155

 

4.34

 

2,073,547

 

 

76,724

 

3.70

Loans held for sale - discontinued operations

 

 

116,725

 

 

4,588

 

3.93

 

376,757

 

 

18,224

 

4.84

 

428,656

 

 

20,453

 

4.77

Total interest-earning assets

 

 

2,387,468

 

 

110,894

 

4.64

 

2,569,178

 

 

113,379

 

4.41

 

2,502,203

 

 

97,177

 

3.88

Non-earning assets

 

 

198,960

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

211,393

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

217,455

 

 

  

 

  

 

Total assets

 

$

2,586,428

 

 

  

 

  

 

$

2,780,571

 

 

  

 

  

 

$

2,719,658

 

 

  

 

  

 

Liabilities

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

Interest bearing deposits:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

NOW, money market, and savings

 

 

1,107,765

 

 

18,155

 

1.64

 

1,001,025

 

 

10,627

 

1.06

 

868,999

 

 

5,921

 

0.68

Time deposits

 

 

23,072

 

 

191

 

0.83

 

10,046

 

 

115

 

1.14

 

11,345

 

 

53

 

0.47

Brokered deposits

 

 

84,601

 

 

2,046

 

2.42

 

84,105

 

 

1,764

 

2.10

 

168,685

 

 

1,960

 

1.16

Total interest-bearing deposits

 

 

1,215,438

 

 

20,392

 

1.68

 

1,095,176

 

 

12,506

 

1.14

 

1,049,029

 

 

7,934

 

0.76

Total borrowings

 

 

54,931

 

 

1,297

 

2.36

 

139,422

 

 

2,703

 

1.94

 

175,060

 

 

1,758

 

1.00

Total long-term debt

 

 

49,782

 

 

3,294

 

6.62

 

49,613

 

 

3,304

 

6.66

 

49,444

 

 

3,294

 

6.66

Total interest-bearing liabilities - continuing operations

 

 

1,320,151

 

 

24,983

 

1.89

 

1,284,211

 

 

18,513

 

1.44

 

1,273,533

 

 

12,986

 

1.02

Interest-bearing liabilities - discontinued operations

 

 

144,064

 

 

1,502

 

1.04

 

467,101

 

 

4,084

 

0.87

 

466,777

 

 

2,143

 

0.46

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

1,464,215

 

 

26,485

 

1.81

 

1,751,312

 

 

22,597

 

1.29

 

1,740,310

 

 

15,129

 

0.87

Demand deposits

 

 

589,862

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

538,110

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

490,495

 

 

  

 

  

 

Demand deposits - discontinued operations

 

 

39,253

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

137,905

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

140,551

 

 

  

 

  

 

Other liabilities

 

 

162,882

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

37,991

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

29,497

 

 

  

 

  

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

330,216

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

315,253

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

318,805

 

 

  

 

  

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

2,586,428

 

 

  

 

  

 

$

2,780,571

 

 

  

 

  

 

$

2,719,658

 

 

  

 

  

 

Net interest spread - continuing operations

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

2.79

 

  

 

 

  

 

2.90

 

  

 

 

  

 

2.68

Net interest income and net interest margin - continuing operations(3)

 

 

  

 

$

81,323

 

3.58

 

  

 

$

76,642

 

3.50

 

  

 

$

63,738

 

3.07

Net interest income and net interest margin(3)

 

 

  

 

$

84,409

 

3.54

 

  

 

$

90,782

 

3.53

 

  

 

$

82,048

 

3.28




(1)

On April 5, 2019, the Company sold its Tennessee and northwest Georgia banking operations, including 14 branches and the mortgage business. The banking business and branches that were sold to FirstBank are reported as discontinued operations. Discontinued operations have been reported retrospectively for all prior periods presented.


(2)

Interest income on tax-exempt securities has been increased to reflect comparable interest on taxable securities. The rate used was 21% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and 35% for the year ended December 31, 2017, reflecting the statutory federal income tax rates.


(3)

Taxable equivalent net interest income divided by total interest-earning assets using the appropriate day count convention based on the type of interest-earning asset. For a reconciliation of Non-GAAP financial measures, see “Item 6 - Selected Financial Data - Non-GAAP Performance Measures Reconciliation.”


48


The following table shows the relative effect on taxable equivalent net interest income for changes in the average outstanding amounts (volume) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the rates earned and paid on such assets and liabilities (rate). Variances resulting from a combination of changes in rate and volume are allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each category.

Table 2 - Changes in Net Interest Income

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 Compared to 2018

 

2018 Compared to 2017

 

 

Increase (decrease) Due to Changes in:

 

Increase (decrease) Due to Changes in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

    

Volume

    

Yield/Rate

    

Change

    

Volume

    

Yield/Rate

    

Change

Interest earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest bearing deposits in other banks

 

$

128

 

$

(163)

 

$

(35)

 

$

401

 

$

927

 

$

1,328

Other short-term investments

 

 

(345)

 

 

37

 

 

(308)

 

 

26

 

 

130

 

 

156

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Taxable investment securities

 

 

(2,749)

 

 

932

 

 

(1,817)

 

 

302

 

 

1,482

 

 

1,784

Non-taxable investment securities(1)

 

 

642

 

 

(114)

 

 

528

 

 

(163)

 

 

(401)

 

 

(564)

Total investment securities

 

 

(2,107)

 

 

818

 

 

(1,289)

 

 

139

 

 

1,081

 

 

1,220

Loans - continuing operations

 

 

8,902

 

 

4,010

 

 

12,912

 

 

4,646

 

 

11,028

 

 

15,674

FHLB and FRB stock

 

 

(236)

 

 

107

 

 

(129)

 

 

(49)

 

 

102

 

 

53

Total interest-earning assets - continuing operations

 

 

6,342

 

 

4,809

 

 

11,151

 

 

5,163

 

 

13,268

 

 

18,431

Loans held for sale - discontinued operations

 

 

(10,221)

 

 

(3,415)

 

 

(13,636)

 

 

(2,510)

 

 

281

 

 

(2,229)

Total interest-earning assets

 

 

(3,879)

 

 

1,394

 

 

(2,485)

 

 

2,653

 

 

13,549

 

 

16,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest bearing liabilities

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Interest bearing deposits:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

NOW, money market, and savings

 

 

1,749

 

 

5,779

 

 

7,528

 

 

1,402

 

 

3,304

 

 

4,706

Time deposits

 

 

108

 

 

(32)

 

 

76

 

 

(15)

 

 

77

 

 

62

Brokered deposits

 

 

12

 

 

270

 

 

282

 

 

(1,774)

 

 

1,578

 

 

(196)

Total interest-bearing deposits

 

 

1,869

 

 

6,017

 

 

7,886

 

 

(387)

 

 

4,959

 

 

4,572

Total borrowings

 

 

(1,995)

 

 

589

 

 

(1,406)

 

 

(691)

 

 

1,636

 

 

945

Total long-term debt

 

 

11

 

 

(21)

 

 

(10)

 

 

11

 

 

(1)

 

 

10

Total interest-bearing liabilities - continuing operations

 

 

(115)

 

 

6,585

 

 

6,470

 

 

(1,067)

 

 

6,594

 

 

5,527

Interest-bearing liabilities - discontinued operations

 

 

(3,368)

 

 

786

 

 

(2,582)

 

 

 3

 

 

1,938

 

 

1,941

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

(3,483)

 

 

7,371

 

 

3,888

 

 

(1,064)

 

 

8,532

 

 

7,468

Change in net interest income - continuing operations

 

$

6,457

 

$

(1,776)

 

$

4,681

 

$

6,230

 

$

6,674

 

$

12,904

Change in net interest income

 

$

(396)

 

$

(5,977)

 

$

(6,373)

 

$

3,717

 

$

5,017

 

$

8,734


Table 2 - Changes in Net Interest Income          
(in thousands)            
  2017 Compared to 2016
Increase (decrease) Due to Changes in:
 2016 Compared to 2015
Increase (decrease) Due to Changes in:
  Volume Yield/Rate Total Change Volume Yield/Rate Total Change
Interest earning assets            
Interest bearing deposits in other banks $(77) $410
 $333
 $172
 $148
 $320
Other short-term investments (168) 120
 (48) (354) 20
 (334)
Investment securities:            
    Taxable investment securities 1,094
 1,372
 2,466
 2,289
 (713) 1,576
    Non-taxable investment securities(1)
 1,239
 200
 1,439
 1,297
 (55) 1,242
Total investment securities 2,333
 1,572
 3,905
 3,586
 (768) 2,818
Total loans (2,209) 6,317
 4,108
 32,290
 3,929
 36,219
FHLB stock 159
 19
 178
 605
 43
 648
Total interest-earning assets 38
 8,438
 8,476
 36,299
 3,372
 39,671
Interest bearing liabilities            
Interest bearing deposits:            
NOW, money market, and savings 157
 1,937
 2,094
 1,755
 294
 2,049
Time deposits (451) 649
 198
 676
 110
 786
Internet and brokered deposits (452) 838
 386
 511
 435
 946
Total interest-bearing deposits (746) 3,424
 2,678
 2,942
 839
 3,781
Total borrowings (11) 944
 933
 429
 (51) 378
Total long-term debt 11
 (2) 9
 2,431
 (4) 2,427
Total interest-bearing liabilities (746) 4,366
 3,620
 5,802
 784
 6,586
             
Change in net interest income $784
 $4,072
 $4,856
 $30,497
 $2,588
 $33,085
             
(1) Interest income on tax-exempt securities has been increased to reflect comparable interest on taxable securities. The rate used was 35%, reflecting the statutory federal income tax rate.

(1)

Interest income on tax-exempt securities has been increased to reflect comparable interest on taxable securities. The rate used was 21% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and 35% for the year ended December 31, 2017, reflecting the statutory federal income tax rates.

Provision for Loan Losses

Management considers a number of factors in determining the required level of the allowance for loan losses and the provision required to achieve what is believed to be appropriate reserve level, including historical loss experience, loan growth, credit risk rating trends, nonperforming loan levels, delinquencies, loan portfolio concentrations and economic and market trends. The provision for loan losses represents management’s determination of the amount necessary to be charged against the current period’s earnings to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that it considered adequate in relation to the estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio.

49

The provision for loan losses from continuing operations was $2.7 million in 2019,  an increase of $766,000, or 39.4%, compared to 2018, due to an increase in net charge-offs as well as an increase in specific reserve impairments. In 2018, the Company recorded negative provision for loan losses of $3.1 million included in discontinued operations, which was primarily due to the classification of $373 million of loans to held for sale. The provision for loan losses was $3.2$1.9 million in 2017,2018, a decrease of $598,000,$1.3 million, or 16%39.5%, compared to 2016.2017. The decrease from 2017 to 2018 was primarily relateddue to a reductionlower net charge-offs in loan growth. The provision for loan losses was $3.8 million in 2016, a decrease of $4.2 million, or 53%, compared to 2015. In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, there was no allowance for loan losses brought forward on loans acquired from First Security on October 31, 2015. 2018.

At December 31, 2015, Atlantic Capital included the performing non-impaired loans acquired from First Security in its general allowance calculation in order to reflect the necessary allowance for incurred losses, which accounted for a majority of the decrease in provision expense from 2015 to 2016.



At December 31, 2017,2019, nonperforming loans totaled $2.9$7.3 million compared to $1.6$5.2 million at December 31, 2016.2018. The increase was primarily attributable to the Bank placing one loan relationship totaling $1.8 millionaddition of commercial and industrial loans being placed on nonaccrual status.status, offset by a decrease in nonaccrual commercial real estate loans and residential mortgage loans. Net loan charge-offs were 0.23%0.11%, 0.11%0.02%, and 0.05%, respectively,0.23% of average loans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019,  2018, and 2015,2017, respectively. The allowance for loan losses to total loans at December 31, 20172019  was 1.00%0.99%, compared to 1.04%1.03% at December 31, 2016.
2018.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income was $46.0 million in 2019, compared to $13.4 million in 2018, and $16.2 million in 2017, compared with $21.7 million in 2016, and $9.4 million in 2015.2017. The following table presents the components of noninterest income.

Table 3 - Noninterest Income

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 

 

Change

 

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2019‑2018

Service charges

$

3,587

 

$

3,215

 

$

2,734

 

$

372

Securities gains (losses), net

 

907

 

 

(1,855)

 

 

(63)

 

 

2,762

Gain (loss) on sales of other assets

 

127

 

 

(154)

 

 

742

 

 

281

Trust income

 

 —

 

 

1,025

 

 

1,814

 

 

(1,025)

Derivatives (loss) income

 

(322)

 

 

308

 

 

156

 

 

(630)

Bank owned life insurance

 

1,546

 

 

1,506

 

 

1,530

 

 

40

SBA lending activities

 

4,178

 

 

3,606

 

 

4,129

 

 

572

Gain on sale of trust business

 

 —

 

 

1,681

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,681)

Other noninterest income

 

702

 

 

715

 

 

1,137

 

 

(13)

Total noninterest income - continuing operations

 

10,725

 

 

10,047

 

 

12,179

 

 

678

Noninterest income - discontinued operations

 

35,289

 

 

3,347

 

 

4,010

 

 

31,942

Noninterest income

$

46,014

 

$

13,394

 

$

16,189

 

$

32,620

Table 3 - Noninterest Income       
(in thousands)        
   Twelve months ended December 31, Change
  2017 2016 2015 2017-2016
Service charges $5,076
 $5,487
 $2,613
 $(411)
Gain (loss) on sales of securities (63) 44
 10
 (107)
Gain on sale of other assets 742
 388
 189
 354
Mortgage income 1,255
 1,917
 163
 (662)
Trust income 1,814
 1,411
 192
 403
Derivatives income 156
 578
 304
 (422)
Bank owned life insurance 1,530
 1,610
 2,159
 (80)
SBA lending activities 4,129
 3,642
 2,910
 487
TriNet lending activities 87
 1,501
 
 (1,414)
Gains on sale of branches 302
 3,885
 
 (3,583)
Other noninterest income 1,161
 1,269
 859
 (108)
             Total noninterest income $16,189
 $21,732
 $9,399
 $(5,543)

Service charges from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased $411,000,2019 increased $372,000, or 7%11.6%, from 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to growth in the reductionCompany’s payments processing businesses.

Securities gains from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $2.8 million from a loss of retail customer activity from$1.9 million in 2018 primarily as a result of the balance sheet realignment due to the Branch Sale. In the fourth quarter of 2018, Atlantic Capital recorded a loss of $1.9 million on the sale of seven legacy FSGBank branches$63 million in investment securities to help fund the second quartercash owed to the buyer at the closing of 2016 and one branch in the second quarter of 2017. Branch Sale.

Gain on sales of other assets from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 20172019 increased $354,000,$281,000 compared to 2018 due to a gain on the sale of a foreclosed property compared to a loss on disposition of fixed assets in the second quarter of 2018 related to the relocation of our Atlanta headquarters.

Trust income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $1.0 million, or 91%100%, from 2018 due to the sale of the trust business in the second quarter of 2018.  

Derivatives income (loss) from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 was a loss of $322,000 compared to a gain of $308,000 for 2018. The decrease in income was due to changes in the derivatives credit valuation adjustment.

50

Income from SBA lending activities from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $572,000, or 15.9%, compared to 20162018 due to increases in loan balances sold. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, guaranteed portions of loans with principal balances of $62.9 million and $52.2 million, respectively, were sold in the secondary market.

Noninterest income from discontinued operations increased $31.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 due to a $239,000$34.5 million gain in connection with the Branch Sale.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, noninterest income totaled $13.4 million compared to $16.2 million for 2017, a $2.8 million, or 17.3%, decrease. The most significant component of the decrease was a $1.8 million loss on sales of securities driven by the aforementioned sale of $63 million in investment securities as well as a decrease in gain on salesales of other assets of $896,000 from 2017 to 2018.  The decrease in gain on sales of other assets was the result of a $323,000 decrease in net gains on sales of other real estate owned and a gain of $426,000 gain on the sale of a tax credit investment in 2017. MortgageAdditionally, the decrease in other noninterest income from continuing operations was due to a $789,000, or 43.5%, decrease in trust income from 2017 to 2018 due to the sale of the trust business in 2018 and a $663,000, or 16.5%, decrease in noninterest income from discontinued operations. Partially offsetting the decrease in noninterest income was a $1.7 million gain on the sale of the trust business in 2018.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense was $62.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased $662,000, or 35%, from 2016 due to higher interest rates and lower demand. Trust income for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $403,000, or 29%, from 2016 due to an increase in managed assets. During the fourth quarter of 2017, Atlantic Capital entered into an agreement to sell the trust division and exit the trust business.

Income from SBA lending activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $487,000, or 13%,2019 as compared to 2016, due to a higher amount of principal balances sold. During the years ended 2017 and 2016, guaranteed portions of 43 and 47 SBA loans with principal balances of $65.0 million and $56.9 million, respectively, were sold in the secondary market. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the TriNet lending division contributed $1.5$69.9 million in noninterest income from the sale of loans. During the third quarter of 2016, Atlantic Capital made the decision to close the TriNet Lending division.
The sale of seven branches in the second quarter of 2016 resulted in a net gain of $3.9 million2018, and included the sale of approximately $191.0$73.5 million in deposits, $34.7 million in loans and $8.6 million in other assets.2017. The net gain includeddecrease from 2018 to 2019 was primarily the write-offresult of $2.0 million in core deposit intangibles. In addition, $305,000 in expenses related to the sales were recorded in noninterest expense.
The sale of one branch in the second quarter of 2017 resulted in a net gain of $302,000 as well as a reduction of approximately $21.9 million in deposits and approximately $27.3 million in loans and other assets. The gross gain of $533,000 was reduced by an impairment of $337,000 in core deposit intangibles, which was offset by a $106,000 reversal in time deposit premium. There were also $38,000 of expenses associated with the divestiture includeddecrease in noninterest expense from discontinued operations from $19.9 million in 2018 to $9.7 million in 2019 in connection with the second quarter of 2017.
For 2016, noninterest income totaled $21.7 million compared to $9.4 million for 2015, a $12.3 million, or 131%, increase. In addition to the $3.9 million net gain on branch salesBranch Sale that occurred in 2016, the most significant component of the increase was a $2.9 million, or 110%, increase in service charges which was primarily due to the addition of First Security deposits. Mortgage income and trust income for 2016 increased from 2015 due to these two new lines of business acquired from First Security.


Noninterest Expense
2019. The following table presents the components of noninterest expense.
Table 4 - Noninterest Expense
(in thousands)        
   Twelve months ended December 31, Change
  2017 2016 2015 2017-2016
Salaries and employee benefits $45,375
 $42,303
 $24,098
 $3,072
Occupancy 4,589
 4,604
 2,170
 (15)
Equipment and software 3,449
 2,966
 1,295
 483
Professional services 4,752
 2,918
 1,610
 1,834
Postage, printing and supplies 340
 462
 178
 (122)
Communications and data processing 4,149
 3,291
 1,541
 858
Marketing and business development 946
 1,100
 410
 (154)
FDIC premiums 966
 1,568
 789
 (602)
Merger expense and conversion costs 304
 2,742
 9,154
 (2,438)
Amortization of intangibles 1,653
 2,445
 526
 (792)
Foreclosed property/problem asset expense 124
 864
 70
 (740)
Other noninterest expense 6,818
 8,017
 4,092
 (1,199)
             Total noninterest expense $73,465
 $73,280
 $45,933
 $185

Table 4 - Noninterest expenses were $73.5 million Expense

(in 2017 as compared to $73.3 million in 2016, and $45.9 million in 2015. The slight increase from 2016 to 2017 is primarily the result of higher salaries, employee benefits, and professional services expenses which were offset by decreases in merger and conversion costs, and other noninterest expense.thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 

 

Change

 

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2019‑2018

Salaries and employee benefits

$

34,537

 

$

31,766

 

$

33,130

 

$

2,771

Occupancy

 

2,888

 

 

2,972

 

 

2,516

 

 

(84)

Equipment and software

 

3,103

 

 

2,817

 

 

2,341

 

 

286

Professional services

 

2,908

 

 

3,511

 

 

4,591

 

 

(603)

Postage, printing and supplies

 

137

 

 

166

 

 

244

 

 

(29)

Communications and data processing

 

3,199

 

 

2,676

 

 

2,625

 

 

523

Marketing and business development

 

845

 

 

710

 

 

798

 

 

135

FDIC premiums

 

217

 

 

562

 

 

697

 

 

(345)

Merger and conversion costs

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

304

 

 

 —

Other noninterest expense

 

5,274

 

 

4,811

 

 

5,588

 

 

463

Total noninterest expense

 

53,108

 

 

49,991

 

 

52,834

 

 

3,117

Noninterest expense - discontinued operations

 

9,685

 

 

19,941

 

 

20,631

 

 

(10,256)

Noninterest expense

$

62,793

 

$

69,932

 

$

73,465

 

$

(7,139)

Salaries and employee benefits expense for 2017 was $45.4 million, an increase of $3.1 million, or 7%, from 2016. The increase was due to severance costs and $2.0 million in expenses related to the President and Chief Operating Officer’s resignation. Full time equivalent headcount totaled 348 at December 31, 2017 compared to 345 at December 31, 2016, an increase of 3 full time equivalent positions, mainly due to increased staffing needs of the Bank.

Equipment and software expense of $3.4 million for 2017 was up $483,000, or 16%, compared to 2016, primarily due to higher maintenance contracts and an increase in managed services costs.
Professional services fees of $4.8 million for 2017 were up $1.8 million, or 63%, compared to 2016, primarily due to higher accounting and legal fees related to the public offering of Atlantic Capital stock by a selling stockholder during the third quarter of 2017. Communications and data processing expenses for 2017 of $4.1 million were up $858,000, or 26%, compared to 2016. This is the result of reduced core processing expenses in 2016 due to vendor credits which expired in 2017.
Merger and conversion costs totaled $304,000continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019 was $34.5 million,  an increase of $2.8 million, or 8.7%, from 2018. The increase was primarily attributable to severance expense unrelated to the Branch Sale, an increase in medical insurance expense and new hires made in 2019. Full time equivalent headcount totaled 204 at December 31, 2019 compared to 334 at December 31, 2018, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 89%, from 2016. These costs include professional fees, severance, rebranding and data conversion related130 full time equivalent positions, primarily due to the acquisition of First Security.
Amortization of intangibles includes the amortization of core deposit intangible related to the acquisition of First Security and totaled $1.7 million and $2.4 millionBranch Sale.

Professional services from continuing operations decreased by $603,000, or 17.2%, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Other noninterest expense decreased $1.2 million, or 15%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2019 compared to 2018 primarily due to lower consultant fees.

Communications and data processing expense from continuing operations was $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $2.7 million for 2018. This increase of $523,000 was the result of a higher volume of transactions in the payments business as well as non-recurring charges related to vendor negotiations and contract terminations.

51

FDIC premiums expense from continuing operations was $217,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease includesof $345,000 from 2018. This decline in FDIC premiums expense was the result of a $357,000, or 23%, decreasesmall bank assessment credit in 2019 and the termination of FICO assessments in the second quarter of 2019.

The increase of $463,000 in other outside services, a $249,000, or 40%, decreasenoninterest expense from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was primarily driven by an increase in insurance expenses, and a $307,000, or 60%, decrease in mortgage warehouse servicing fees.

provision for unfunded commitments of $484,000, due to higher levels of outstanding commitments.

Noninterest expense totaled $73.3$69.9 million for 2016,2018, a $27.3$3.5 million, or 60%4.8%, increasedecrease from $45.9$73.5 million in 2015.2017. The increasedecrease from 20152017 to 20162018 is primarily the result of higherlower salaries and employee benefits occupancy, equipmentexpense and software and data processing expenses related to the acquisition of First Security.



professional services expenses.

Income Taxes

Atlantic Capital monitors and evaluates the potential impact of current events on the estimates used to establish income tax expenses and income tax liabilities. On a periodic basis, Atlantic Capital evaluates its income tax positions based on current tax law and positions taken by various tax auditors within the jurisdictions where Atlantic Capital is required to file income tax returns.

Income tax provisionexpense from continuing operations was $24.4$7.6 million in 2017,2019, compared to income tax provisionexpense from continuing operations of $7.9$6.3 million in 20162018 and $794,000$23.7 million in 2015.2017. The effective tax rate (as a percentage of pre-tax earnings) for 2019,  2018, and 2017 2016,was 21.3%,  18.4%, and 2015 was 118.0%, 37.2% and (151.3)%125.1%, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate for 20172018 compared to 20162017 resulted primarily from a $17.4 million reduction of the value of Atlantic Capital’s net deferred tax asset due to the tax reform legislation signed into law in December 2017. The change in the effective tax rate for 2016 compared to 2015 resulted from the impact of a pre-tax loss in 2015, as well as the impact of non-deductible merger expenses and the increase in non-taxable income on municipal securities purchased throughout 2016.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and their respective tax basis including operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Net deferred tax assets (deferred tax assets net of deferred tax liabilities and valuation allowance) are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of total assets.

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes, requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be established against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. The determination of whether a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is appropriate is subject to considerable judgment and requires an evaluation of all positive and negative evidence with more weight given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Each quarter, management considers both positive and negative evidence and analyzes changes in near-term market conditions as well as other factors which may impact future operating results.

Based on all evidence considered, as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, management concluded that it was more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset would be realized, except as outlined in the following discussion. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, Atlantic Capital recorded a deferred tax asset valuation allowance totaling $8.5$6.7 million and $9.2$7.4 million, respectively, on certain net operating loss carryforwards due to the fact that certain tax attributes are subject to an annual limitation as a result of the acquisition of First Security, which constituted a change of ownership as defined under Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Management expects to generate future taxable income and believes this will allow for full utilization of Atlantic Capital’s remaining net operating loss carryforwards within the statutory carryforward periods.

Additional information regarding income taxes, including a reconciliation of the differences between the recorded income tax provision and the amount of income tax computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes, can be found in Note 14 - Income Taxes to the consolidated financial statements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 were $2.89$2.91 billion and $2.73$2.96 billion, respectively. Average total assets for 20172019 were $2.72$2.59 billion, compared to $2.71$2.78 billion for 2016.2018.


52


Loans

At December 31, 2017,2019, total loans held for investment decreased $47.5increased $146.0 million, or 2%8.4%, compared to December 31, 2016,2018, primarily due to a decreasean increase of $107.5$59.7 million, or 9.3%, in the mortgage warehouse.commercial and industrial loans as well as increases in commercial real estate owner occupied loans and non-owner occupied loans of $59.6 million and $52.3 million, respectively. Details of loans at December 31, 2019,  2018,  2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 20132015 are provided in Table 5.

Table 5 - Loans

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

Loans held for sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TriNet loans held for sale

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

58,934

Branch loans held for sale

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

30,917

 

 

35,470

Loans held for sale - discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

373,030

 

 

415,206

 

 

465,946

 

 

450,078

Loans held for sale - continuing operations

 

 

370

 

 

5,889

 

 

1,487

 

 

4,302

 

 

1,061

Total loans held for sale

 

$

370

 

$

378,919

 

$

416,693

 

$

501,165

 

$

545,543

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans held for investment

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial loans:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial and industrial

 

$

705,115

 

$

645,374

 

$

539,046

 

$

435,836

 

$

363,866

Commercial real estate:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Owner occupied

 

 

357,912

 

 

298,291

 

 

250,588

 

 

251,796

 

 

168,641

Non-owner occupied

 

 

558,416

 

 

496,537

 

 

503,398

 

 

447,296

 

 

471,596

Construction and land

 

 

127,540

 

 

156,232

 

 

101,801

 

 

174,810

 

 

118,766

Mortgage warehouse loans

 

 

13,941

 

 

27,967

 

 

39,981

 

 

147,519

 

 

84,350

Total commercial loans

 

 

1,762,924

 

 

1,624,401

 

 

1,434,814

 

 

1,457,257

 

 

1,207,219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Residential mortgages

 

 

31,315

 

 

32,800

 

 

12,960

 

 

16,418

 

 

77,235

Home equity

`

 

25,002

 

 

22,822

 

 

39,407

 

 

6,829

 

 

26,034

Total residential loans

 

 

56,317

 

 

55,622

 

 

52,367

 

 

23,247

 

 

103,269

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

 

 

37,765

 

 

25,851

 

 

21,959

 

 

18,882

 

 

20,028

Other

 

 

19,552

 

 

24,712

 

 

13,303

 

 

19,560

 

 

12,531

Loans held for investment, gross

 

 

1,876,558

 

 

1,730,586

 

 

1,522,443

 

 

1,518,946

 

 

1,343,047

Less net deferred fees and other unearned income

 

 

(3,034)

 

 

(2,513)

 

 

(3,810)

 

 

(3,562)

 

 

(2,006)

Less allowance for loan losses

 

 

(18,535)

 

 

(17,851)

 

 

(19,344)

 

 

(20,595)

 

 

(18,905)

Loans held for investment, net

 

$

1,854,989

 

$

1,710,222

 

$

1,499,289

 

$

1,494,789

 

$

1,322,136

53

Table 5 - Loans          
(in thousands)          
  December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
           
Loans held for sale          
TriNet loans held for sale $
 $
 $58,934
 $
 $
Branch loans held for sale 
 30,917
 35,470
 
 
Other loans held for sale 1,487
 4,302
 1,061
 
 
Total loans held for sale $1,487
 $35,219
 $95,465
 $
 $
           
Loans held for investment          
Commercial loans:          
Commercial and industrial $615,359
 $531,061
 $467,083
 $365,447
 $329,651
Commercial real estate:          
Owner occupied 346,746
 352,523
 320,656
 193,892
 188,956
Non-owner occupied 593,669
 506,255
 525,757
 245,179
 207,627
Construction and land 115,495
 219,352
 166,358
 82,567
 49,101
Mortgage warehouse loans 39,981
 147,519
 84,350
 116,939
 8,026
Total commercial loans 1,711,250
 1,756,710
 1,564,204
 1,004,024
 783,361
           
Residential:          
Residential mortgages 104,484
 101,921
 110,381
 1,320
 
Home equity 76,244
 77,358
 80,738
 28,464
 27,006
Total residential loans 180,728
 179,279
 191,119
 29,784
 27,006
           
Consumer 29,393
 27,338
 30,451
 9,290
 8,719
Other 16,278
 21,565
 6,901
 
 
  1,937,649
 1,984,892
 1,792,675
 1,043,098
 819,086
Less net deferred fees and other unearned income (3,810) (3,562) (2,006) (3,385) (2,084)
Less allowance for loan losses (19,344) (20,595) (18,905) (11,421) (10,815)
Loans held for investment, net $1,914,495
 $1,960,735
 $1,771,764
 $1,028,292
 $806,187



The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of loans as of December 31, 2017.2019.

Table 6 - Loan Maturity Distribution and Interest Rate Sensitivity

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Within

 

One to

 

After

 

 

 

 

    

One Year

    

Five Years

    

Five Years

    

Total

Loans held for investment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

187,130

 

$

336,077

 

$

181,908

 

$

705,115

Commercial real estate

 

 

100,020

 

 

387,694

 

 

428,614

 

 

916,328

Construction and land

 

 

46,269

 

 

63,040

 

 

18,231

 

 

127,540

Mortgage warehouse loans

 

 

13,941

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13,941

Residential mortgages

 

 

785

 

 

1,124

 

 

29,406

 

 

31,315

Home equity

 

 

5,507

 

 

9,022

 

 

10,473

 

 

25,002

Consumer

 

 

15,328

 

 

22,400

 

 

37

 

 

37,765

Other

 

 

3,044

 

 

8,784

 

 

7,724

 

 

19,552

Total loans held for investment

 

$

372,024

 

$

828,141

 

$

676,393

 

$

1,876,558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans maturing with:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Fixed interest rates

 

$

86,722

 

$

303,579

 

$

351,995

 

$

742,296

Floating or adjustable rates

 

 

285,302

 

 

524,562

 

 

324,398

 

 

1,134,262

Total loans held for investment

 

$

372,024

 

$

828,141

 

$

676,393

 

$

1,876,558

Table 6 - Loan Maturity Distribution and Interest Rate Sensitivity    
(in thousands)        
    
   Within  One to  After  Total
 One Year Five Years Five Years 
Loans:            
Commercial and industrial  $231,023
  $268,262
  $116,074
  $615,359
Commercial real estate  102,755
  385,317
  452,343
  940,415
Construction and land  43,218
  64,533
  7,744
  115,495
Mortgage warehouse loans  39,981
  
  
  39,981
Residential mortgages  13,790
  16,528
  74,166
  104,484
Home equity  19,711
  17,064
  39,469
  76,244
Consumer  5,158
  17,419
  6,816
  29,393
Other 2,291
  12,122
  1,865
  16,278
Total loans $457,927
 $781,245
 $698,477
 $1,937,649
             
Loans maturing with:        
Fixed interest rates $55,540
 $218,705
 $336,025
 $610,270
Floating or adjustable rates 402,387
 562,540
 362,452
 1,327,379
Total loans $457,927
 $781,245
 $698,477
 $1,937,649
             

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, accruing loans past due 90 days or more, and other real estate owned. Loans are considered to be past due when payment is not received from the borrower by the contractually specified due date. Interest accruals on loans are discontinued when interest or principal has been in default 90 days or more, unless the loan is secured by collateral that is sufficient to repay the debt in full and the loan is in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, interest accrued and not paid in the current accounting period is reversed against current period income. Interest accrued and not paid in prior periods, if significant, is reversed against the allowance for loan losses.

Income on such loans is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the future collection of principal is deemed probable or after all principal payments are received. Commercial loans are placed back on accrual status after sustained performance of timely and current principal and interest payments and it is probable that all remaining amounts due, both principal and interest, are fully collectible according to the terms of the loan agreement. Residential loans and consumer loans are generally placed back on accrual status when they are no longer past due.

Purchased Credit Impaired (“PCI”) loans accounted for under ASC 310-30310‑30 are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement remains unpaid after the due date of the scheduled payment. However, these loans are considered as performing, even though they may be contractually past due, as any non-payment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the periodic re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period covered loan loss provision or future period yield adjustments. PCI loans were not classified as nonaccrual atfor periods ended prior to December 31, 20172018, as the carrying value of the respective loan or pool of loans cash flows were considered estimable and collection was probable. Therefore, interest revenue, through accretion of the difference between the carrying value of the loans and the expected cash flows, is beingwas recognized on all PCI loans.

At December 31, 2017,2018, PCI loans were designated as held-for-sale and subsequently sold in the Branch Sale that occurred in the second quarter of 2019.

At December 31, 2019, Atlantic Capital’s nonperforming assets totaled to $4.1$7.6 million, or 0.14%0.26% of assets, compared to $3.5$6.1 million, or 0.13%0.20% of assets, at December 31, 2016.2018. The increase was primarily due to the Bank placing onetwo loan relationship totaling $1.8 millionrelationships that were placed on nonaccrual status, offset by the sale of an increase in total assets.other real estate owned property during 2019.

54

Nonaccrual loans totaled $2.6$7.2 million and $621,000$4.7 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the Bank placing one loan relationship totaling $1.8 million on nonaccrual status. Loans past due 90 days and still accruing totaled $298,000$85,000 at December 31, 20172019 compared to $994,000$479,000 at December 31, 2016.2018. The gross additional interest revenue that would have been earned if the loans classified as nonaccrual had performed in accordance with the original terms in 2017, 2016,



2019,  2018, and 20152017 is immaterial. Table 7 provides details on nonperforming assets and other risk elements at December 31, 2019,  2018,  2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013.2015.

Table 7 - Nonperforming assets

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

 

    

 

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonaccrual loans

 

$

7,208

 

$

4,697

 

$

2,614

 

$

621

 

$

7,772

 

Loans past due 90 days and still accruing

 

 

85

 

 

479

 

 

298

 

 

994

 

 

777

 

Total nonperforming loans(1) (NPLs)

 

 

7,293

 

 

5,176

 

 

2,912

 

 

1,615

 

 

8,549

 

Other real estate owned

 

 

278

 

 

874

 

 

1,215

 

 

1,872

 

 

1,982

 

Total nonperforming assets (NPAs)

 

$

7,571

 

$

6,050

 

$

4,127

 

$

3,487

 

$

10,531

 

NPLs as a percentage of total loans

 

 

0.39

%  

 

0.25

%  

 

0.15

%  

 

0.08

%  

 

0.45

%  

NPAs as a percentage of total assets

 

 

0.26

%  

 

0.20

%  

 

0.14

%  

 

0.13

%  

 

0.40

%  



(1)

Nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 exclude those loans which are PCI loans. As of December 31, 2018, PCI loans were designated as held for sale in the Branch Sale. As a result, nonperforming loans held for sale which were previously designated as PCI loans are included in total nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2018.

Table 7 - Nonperforming assets           
(Dollars in thousands)           
  December 31, 
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 
Nonaccrual loans $2,614
 $621
 $7,772
 $
 $2,954
 
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing 298
 994
 777
 
 
 
Total nonperforming loans* (NPLs) 2,912
 1,615
 8,549
 
 2,954
 
Other real estate owned 1,215
 1,872
 1,982
 1,531
 1,531
 
Total nonperforming assets (NPAs) $4,127
 $3,487
 $10,531
 $1,531
 $4,485
 
NPLs as a percentage of total loans 0.15
%0.08
%0.45
%
%0.36
%
NPAs as a percentage of total assets 0.14
 0.13
 0.40
 0.12
 0.36
 
*Nonperforming loans excludes those loans which are PCI loans

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) are selectively made to provide relief to customers experiencing liquidity challenges or other circumstances that could affect their ability to meet their debt obligations. Typical modifications include interest rate reductions, term extensions and other concessions intended to minimize losses. Nonperforming TDRs are not accruing interest and are included as nonperforming assets within nonaccrual loans. TDRs, which are accruing interest based on the restructured terms, are considered performing. The following table summarizes TDRs:TDRs at December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015.

Table 8 - Troubled Debt Restructurings

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

Accruing TDRs

 

$

11,953

 

$

8,237

 

$

5,323

 

$

6,602

 

$

4,616

Nonaccruing TDRs

 

 

1,217

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,449

Total TDRs

 

$

13,170

 

$

8,237

 

$

5,323

 

$

6,602

 

$

9,065

Table 8 - Troubled Debt Restructurings      
(in thousands)          
           
  December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Accruing TDRs $5,323
 $6,602
 $4,616
 $6,601
 $6,809
Nonaccruing TDRs 
 
 4,449
 
 
    Total TDRs $5,323
 $6,602
 $9,065
 $6,601
 $6,809

The gross additional interest income that would have been earned in 2017, 2016, and 20152019 had performing TDRs performed in accordance with the original terms is immaterial.

55

Potential Problem Loans

Management identifies and maintains a list of potential problem loans. These are loans that are internally risk graded special mention or below but which are not included in nonaccrual status and are not past due 90 days or more. A loan is added to the potential problem list when management becomes aware of information about possible credit problems of the borrower which raises serious doubts as to the ability of such borrower to comply with the current loan repayment terms. Potential problem loans totaled $54.6$76.3 million and $47.6$58.2 million, respectively, as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016.2018. As a percentage of total loans, excluding PCI loans, potential problem loans increased towere 4.1% and 2.8% from 2.4%. The potential problem loan balance atas of December 31, 2017 does not include2019 and 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2018, PCI loans were not significant due to the reclassification of $11.8 million which have a remaining purchase discountmajority of $2.4 million.these loans to held for sale. These PCI loans were subsequently sold in 2019. As a number of potential problem loans are real estate secured, management closely tracks the current values of real estate collateral when assessing the collectability of these loans.



Allowance for Loan Losses

At December 31, 2017,2019, the allowance for loan losses totaled $19.3$18.5 million, or 1.00%0.99% of total loans, compared to $20.6$17.9 million, or 1.04%1.03% of total loans, at December 31, 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease in the allowance was primarily related to the $3.3 million charge-off of aan increase in outstanding loan relationship and the reversal of thebalances as well as an increase in specific reserve.

reserves.

Net charge-offs during 20172019 and 20162018 were $4.5$2.0 million and $2.1 million,$342,000, respectively. The increase wasrelated primarily due to a $3.3 million charge-off of athe following: net charge-offs for Tennessee commercial and industrial relationship.loans not included in the Branch Sale totaling $330,000 and net charge-offs on commercial and industrial SBA loans totaling $1.3 million.  Table 9 provides details concerning the allowance for loan losses during the past five years.

Table 9 - Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

 

$

17,851

 

$

19,344

 

$

20,595

 

$

18,905

 

$

11,421

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

2,712

 

 

1,991

 

 

3,239

 

 

3,742

 

 

8,035

 

Provision for loan losses (negative provision) - discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,097)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Provision for PCI loan losses

 

 

 —

 

 

(45)

 

 

(21)

 

 

74

 

 

 —

 

Charge-offs:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

2,022

 

 

126

 

 

4,073

 

 

1,531

 

 

 —

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

47

 

 

50

 

 

132

 

 

342

 

 

500

 

Construction and land

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

16

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Residential mortgages

 

 

 9

 

 

75

 

 

46

 

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

Home equity

 

 

 —

 

 

160

 

 

39

 

 

32

 

 

 —

 

Consumer

 

 

39

 

 

16

 

 

409

 

 

402

 

 

128

 

Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 5

 

 

 —

 

Total charge-offs

 

 

2,117

 

 

427

 

 

4,715

 

 

2,314

 

 

628

 

Recoveries:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

36

 

 

19

 

 

200

 

 

 4

 

 

 —

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

 —

 

 

28

 

 

 2

 

 

 5

 

 

 —

 

Construction and land

 

 

 4

 

 

 —

 

 

16

 

 

27

 

 

29

 

Residential mortgages

 

 

14

 

 

 4

 

 

 1

 

 

 5

 

 

 —

 

Home equity

 

 

 1

 

 

 —

 

 

 1

 

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

Consumer

 

 

34

 

 

34

 

 

26

 

 

143

 

 

48

 

Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

Total recoveries

 

 

89

 

 

85

 

 

246

 

 

188

 

 

77

 

Net charge-offs

 

 

2,028

 

 

342

 

 

4,469

 

 

2,126

 

 

551

 

Allowance for loan losses at end of period (1)

 

$

18,535

 

$

17,851

 

$

19,344

 

$

20,595

 

$

18,905

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average loans

 

$

1,769,613

 

$

1,977,014

 

$

1,936,109

 

$

1,986,482

 

$

1,192,103

 

Loans at end of period

 

 

1,873,524

 

 

1,728,073

 

 

1,933,839

 

 

1,981,330

 

 

1,790,669

 

Ratios

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

Net charge-offs to average loans

 

 

0.11

%  

 

0.02

%  

 

0.23

%  

 

0.11

%  

 

0.05

%  

Allowance for loan losses to total loans (1)

 

 

0.99

 

 

1.03

 

 

1.00

 

 

1.04

 

 

1.06

 


(1)

The allowance for loan losses has not been adjusted retrospectively for discontinued operations in prior periods.

56

Table 9 - Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL)       
(Dollars in thousands)          
 December 31, 
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period$20,595
 $18,905
 $11,421
 $10,815
 $10,736
 
Provision for loan losses3,239
 3,742
 8,035
 488
 246
 
Provision for PCI loan losses(21) 74
 
 
 
 
Charge-offs:          
Commercial and industrial4,073
 1,531
 
 
 167
 
Commercial real estate132
 342
 500
 
 
 
Construction and land16
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgages46
 2
 
 
 
 
Home equity39
 32
 
 
 
 
Consumer409
 402
 128
 
 
 
Other
 5
 
 
 
 
Total charge-offs4,715
 2,314
 628
 
 167
 
Recoveries:          
Commercial and industrial200
 4
 
 
 
 
Commercial real estate2
 5
 
 81
 
 
Construction and land16
 27
 29
 37
 
 
Residential mortgages1
 5
 
 
 
 
Home equity1
 2
 
 
 
 
Consumer26
 143
 48
 
 
 
Other
 2
 
 
 
 
Total recoveries246
 188
 77
 118
 
 
Net charge-offs4,469
 2,126
 551
 (118) 167
 
Allowance for loan losses at end of period$19,344
 $20,595
 $18,905
 $11,421
 $10,815
 
           
Average loans$1,936,109
 $1,986,482
 $1,192,103
 $918,959
 $793,505
 
Loans at end of period1,933,839
 1,981,330
 1,790,669
 1,039,713
 817,002
 
Ratios          
Net charge-offs to average loans0.23
%0.11
%0.05
%(0.01)%0.02
%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans1.00
 1.04
 1.06
 1.10
 1.32
 



Table 10 - Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses         
(Dollars in thousands)                 
                      
  December 31, 
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 
  Allowance for loan losses Percent of loans to total loans Allowance for loan losses Percent of loans to total loans Allowance for loan losses Percent of loans to total loans Allowance for loan losses Percent of loans to total loans Allowance for loan losses Percent of loans to total loans 
            
            
Allowance for loan losses allocated to:                     
Commercial and industrial $8,706
  32
$8,616
  27
$6,186
  26
$4,185
  35
$4,272
  40
Commercial real estate 8,001
  49
  7,159
  44
  8,656
  47
  5,837
  42
  5,438
  49
  
Construction and land 1,560
  6
  2,942
  11
  1,695
  9
  945
  8
  636
  6
  
Mortgage warehouse loans —  
  2
  —  
  7
  —  
  5
  —  
  11
  —  
  1
  
Residential mortgages 409
  5
  732
  5
  1,156
  6
  15
  —  
  —  
  —  
  
Home equity 393
  4
  686
  4
  825
  5
  332
  3
  356
  3
  
Consumer 275
  2
  460
  2
  387
  2
  107
  1
  113
  1
  
Total allowance for loan losses $19,344
  100
$20,595
  100
$18,905
  100
$11,421
  100
$10,815
  100
                      

Table 10 - Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

 

 

Allowance

 

of loans

 

Allowance

 

of loans

 

Allowance

 

of loans

 

Allowance

 

of loans

 

Allowance

 

of loans

 

 

 

for loan

 

to total

 

for loan

 

to total

 

for loan

 

to total

 

for loan

 

to total

 

for loan

 

to total

 

 

   

losses

   

loans

   

losses

   

loans

   

losses

   

loans

   

losses

   

loans

   

losses

   

loans

 

Allowance for loan losses allocated to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

9,014

 

37

%  

$

8,360

 

37

%  

$

8,706

 

32

%  

$

8,616

 

27

%  

$

6,186

 

26

%

Commercial real estate

 

 

7,505

 

49

 

 

6,948

 

46

 

 

8,001

 

49

 

 

7,159

 

44

 

 

8,656

 

47

 

Construction and land

 

 

1,684

 

 7

 

 

2,014

 

 9

 

 

1,560

 

 6

 

 

2,942

 

11

 

 

1,695

 

 9

 

Mortgage warehouse loans

 

 

 —

 

 1

 

 

 —

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

 7

 

 

 —

 

 5

 

Residential mortgages

 

 

82

 

 2

 

 

144

 

 2

 

 

409

 

 5

 

 

732

 

 5

 

 

1,156

 

 6

 

Home equity

 

 

63

 

 1

 

 

148

 

 1

 

 

393

 

 4

 

 

686

 

 4

 

 

825

 

 5

 

Consumer

 

 

187

 

 3

 

 

237

 

 3

 

 

275

 

 2

 

 

460

 

 2

 

 

387

 

 2

 

Total allowance for loan losses

 

$

18,535

 

100

%  

$

17,851

 

100

%  

$

19,344

 

100

%  

$

20,595

 

100

%  

$

18,905

 

100

%

Investment Securities

Investment securities available-for-sale totaled $449.1$282.5 million at December 31, 2017,2019 compared to $347.7$402.5 million at December 31, 2016.2018.  Held-to-maturity securities totaled $117.0 million at December 31, 2019 compared to $0 at December 31, 2018. Available-for-sale securities are reported at their aggregate fair value, and unrealized gains and losses are included as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. As of December 31, 2017,2019, investment securities available-for-sale had a net unrealized lossgain of $5.6$3.2 million compared to a net unrealized loss of $9.6$11.8 million as of December 31, 2016.2018. Market changes in interest rates and credit spreads will result in temporary unrealized losses as the market price of securities fluctuate. After evaluating the securities with unrealized losses, management concluded that no other than temporary impairment existed as of December 31, 2017.

2019 and December 31, 2018.

Changes in the amount of Atlantic Capital’s investment securities portfolio result primarily from balance sheet trends including loans, deposit balances, and short-term borrowings. When inflows arising from deposits and short-term borrowings exceed loan demand, Atlantic Capital invests excess funds in the securities portfolio or in short-term investments. Conversely, when loan demand exceeds growth in deposits and short-term borrowings, Atlantic Capital allows interest-bearing balances with other banks to decline and uses proceeds from maturing securities to fund loan demand.  During 2019, the Company purchased $117.0 million in held-to-maturity municipal securities to extend the duration of the securities portfolio as well as to reduce the asset sensitivity of the balance sheet. During the fourth quarter of 2018, Atlantic Capital sold securities totaling approximately $63 million to provide funding for the Branch Sale. 

57

Details of investment securities at December 31, 2017,2019,  December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 20152017 are provided in Table 11.

Table 11 - Investment Securities

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

Available-for-Sale Securities

    

Cost

    

Fair Value

    

Cost

    

Fair Value

 

Cost

    

Fair Value

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

27,259

 

$

26,849

 

$

34,699

 

$

34,111

U.S. states and political divisions

 

 

81,865

 

 

82,485

 

 

91,864

 

 

84,834

 

 

92,169

 

 

90,001

Trust preferred securities

 

 

4,808

 

 

4,688

 

 

4,781

 

 

4,400

 

 

4,754

 

 

4,650

Corporate debt securities

 

 

19,557

 

 

19,920

 

 

12,855

 

 

12,363

 

 

12,948

 

 

12,622

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

173,047

 

 

175,368

 

 

277,524

 

 

274,040

 

 

310,129

 

 

307,733

Total available-for-sale

 

 

279,277

 

 

282,461

 

 

414,283

 

 

402,486

 

 

454,699

 

 

449,117

Held-to-Maturity Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. states and political divisions

 

 

116,972

 

 

115,291

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total held-to-maturity

 

 

116,972

 

 

115,291

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total securities

 

$

396,249

 

$

397,752

 

$

414,283

 

$

402,486

 

$

454,699

 

$

449,117

Table 11 - Investment Securities        
(in thousands)            
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Available-for-Sale Securities Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value
U.S. Treasuries $
 $
 $
 $
 $4,952
 $4,922
U.S. Government agencies 34,699
 34,111
 21,485
 21,152
 65,373
 64,852
U.S. states and political divisions 92,169
 90,001
 96,908
 90,172
 27,751
 27,790
Trust preferred securities 4,754
 4,650
 4,727
 4,525
 4,732
 4,275
Corporate debt securities 12,948
 12,622
 19,928
 19,231
 20,653
 20,517
Residential mortgage-backed securities 310,129
 307,733
 214,297
 212,625
 226,142
 223,865
Total available-for-sale $454,699
 $449,117
 $357,345
 $347,705
 $349,603
 $346,221


The effective duration of Atlantic Capital’s securities at December 31, 2019 was 6.97 years compared to 5.26 years at December 31, 2018.

The following table presents the contractual maturity of investment securities by maturity date and average yields based on amortized cost. The composition and maturity / maturity/repricing distribution of the securities portfolio is subject to change depending on rate sensitivity, capital and liquidity needs.

58

Table 12 - Investment Securities             
(Dollars in thousands)         
  2017 2016 
  Amortized cost Fair Value Weighted Average Maturity 
Weighted Average Yield(1)
 Amortized cost Fair Value Weighted Average Maturity 
Weighted Average Yield(1)
 
U.S. Government agencies                 
1 to 5 years $9,414
 $9,260
 3.99
 1.99%$2,993
 $2,961
 4.88
 1.78%
5 to 10 years 18,502
 18,191
 5.70
 2.39 10,614
 10,466
 5.27
 2.02 
More than 10 years 6,783
 6,660
 5.25
 2.28 7,878
 7,725
 5.23
 2.24 
  34,699
 34,111
 5.02
 2.23 21,485
 21,152
 5.22
 2.15 
                  
U.S. states and political subdivisions                 
Within 1 year 65
 65
 0.16
 2.98 96
 95
 0.92
 2.51 
1 to 5 years 3,131
 3,091
 3.55
 2.09 4,465
 4,406
 3.34
 1.99 
5 to 10 years 21,134
 20,941
 7.61
 2.09 21,334
 21,000
 7.72
 2.07 
More than 10 years 67,839
 65,904
 16.28
 2.30 71,013
 64,671
 16.83
 2.25 
  92,169
 90,001
 13.41
 2.24 96,908
 90,172
 13.66
 2.19 
Trust preferred securities                 
5 to 10 years 4,754
 4,650
 9.17
 2.82 4,727
 4,525
 10.17
 2.13 
  4,754
 4,650
 9.17
 2.82 4,727
 4,525
 10.17
 2.13 
Corporate debt securities                 
Within 1 year 
 
 
  5,153
 5,172
 0.51
 2.42 
1 to 5 years 9,619
 9,652
 4.07
 2.82 9,339
 9,128
 4.48
 2.41 
5 to 10 years 3,329
 2,970
 5.37
 0.34 5,436
 4,931
 6.01
 1.78 
  12,948
 12,622
 4.22
 2.54 19,928
 19,231
 3.61
 2.27 
                  
Residential mortgage-backed securities 310,129
 307,733
 4.80
 2.43 214,297
 212,625
 4.95
 2.25 
Total $454,699
 $449,117
     $357,345
 $347,705
     
                  
(1) Weighted average yields are not presented in this table on a fully taxable equivalent basis.
   

Table 12 - Investment Securities

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Weighted

    

Weighted

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Weighted

 

    

Weighted

    

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Average

 

Amortized

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Average

 

 

 

cost

 

Fair Value

 

Maturity

 

Yield(1)

 

cost

 

Fair Value

 

Maturity

 

 

Yield(1)

 

U.S. Government agencies

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

1 to 5 years

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

%

$

18,588

 

$

18,294

 

 

4.70

 

 

2.38

%

5 to 10 years

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,883

 

 

2,906

 

 

5.97

 

 

3.02

 

More than 10 years

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

5,788

 

 

5,649

 

 

4.80

 

 

2.28

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

27,259

 

 

26,849

 

 

4.87

 

 

2.36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. states and political subdivisions

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

Within 1 year

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

125

 

 

125

 

 

0.49

 

 

3.48

 

1 to 5 years

 

 

514

 

 

513

 

 

4.17

 

 

1.30

 

 

1,281

 

 

1,253

 

 

4.19

 

 

2.29

 

5 to 10 years

 

 

19,996

 

 

20,245

 

 

8.42

 

 

1.96

 

 

24,023

 

 

23,225

 

 

7.60

 

 

2.07

 

More than 10 years

 

 

178,327

 

 

177,018

 

 

19.02

 

 

2.56

 

 

66,435

 

 

60,231

 

 

16.07

 

 

2.36

 

 

 

 

198,837

 

 

197,776

 

 

19.19

 

 

2.41

 

 

91,864

 

 

84,834

 

 

13.20

 

 

2.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trust preferred securities

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

5 to 10 years

 

 

4,808

 

 

4,688

 

 

7.17

 

 

3.15

 

 

4,781

 

 

4,400

 

 

8.17

 

 

3.99

 

 

 

 

4,808

 

 

4,688

 

 

7.17

 

 

3.15

 

 

4,781

 

 

4,400

 

 

8.17

 

 

3.99

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

Within 1 year

 

 

6,043

 

 

6,136

 

 

1.70

 

 

2.96

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

1 to 5 years

 

 

3,514

 

 

3,565

 

 

2.69

 

 

2.64

 

 

12,855

 

 

12,363

 

 

3.22

 

 

2.68

 

5 to 10 years

 

 

10,000

 

 

10,219

 

 

9.71

 

 

4.13

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

19,557

 

 

19,920

 

 

4.98

 

 

2.98

 

 

12,855

 

 

12,363

 

 

3.22

 

 

2.68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

173,047

 

 

175,368

 

 

7.09

 

 

2.70

 

 

277,524

 

 

274,040

 

 

5.40

 

 

2.59

 

Total

 

$

396,249

 

$

397,752

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

414,283

 

$

402,486

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)

Weighted average yields are not presented in this table on a fully taxable equivalent basis.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Atlantic Capital’s core deposit intangible representing the value of the acquired deposit base, is an amortizing intangible asset that is required to be tested for impairment only when events or circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. There were no events or circumstances that led management to believe that any impairment existed at December 31, 2017This core deposit intangible was fully amortized in Atlantic Capital’s other intangible assets.

the second quarter of 2019 as a result of the Branch Sale.

Goodwill represents the premium paid for acquired companies above the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including separately identifiable intangible assets. Atlantic Capital evaluates its goodwill annually as of October 1, or more frequently if necessary, to determine if any impairment exists.  Factors that management considers in this assessment includes macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, overall financial performance of the Company and changes in the composition or carrying amount of net assets.  Management concluded that the 2019 annual qualitative impairment assessment indicated that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value exceeded the carrying value (including goodwill).


59


On April 5, 2019, the Bank completed the Branch Sale. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, Atlantic Capital allocated a proportionate share of its goodwill balance to the discontinued operations on a relative fair value basis and performed an impairment test for the goodwill remaining in the reporting unit to be retained. This impairment analysis of goodwill remaining in the retained reporting unit resulted in no impairment. The Company monitored events from the date of the assessment through December 31, 2019 and no events or circumstances led management to believe any impairment existed at the balance sheet date.

Deposits

At December 31, 2017,2019, total deposits were $2.45$2.5 billion, an increasea decrease of $213.1$38.9 million, or 10%1.5%, since  December 31, 2016. Noninterest-bearing demand2018. Interest-bearing checking deposits increased $89.0$121.2 million, or 14%48.0%, and money markets increased $205.4$186.0 million, or 23%18.8%, from December 31, 20162018 to December 31, 2017.2019. This was partially offset by a decrease in brokered deposits of $71.4$17.4 million, or 36%17.5%, during the same period. period as well as a decrease of $585.4 million in deposits to be assumed in the Branch Sale. Brokered deposits decreased as a result of growth in core deposits and reduced funding needs.

Total average deposits from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $1.8 billion, an increase of $172.0 million, or 10.5%, from 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018, average noninterest-bearing demand deposits from continuing operations increased $51.8 million, or 9.6%, and average savings and money market deposits from continuing operations increased $109.5 million, or 15.2%. Average time deposits less than $250,000 increased from 2018 to 2019 due to the growth in the partnership with a fintech firm that offers CD-secured loans to its customers in order to build credit and/or improve their credit score.

Table 13 provides the average deposit balances as a percentage of total deposits for December 31, 2017, 2016,2019,  2018, and 2015.2017.

Table 13 - Average Deposits

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

    

 

 

    

% of

    

 

 

    

% of

    

 

 

    

% of

    

 

 

2019

 

total

 

2018

 

total

 

2017

 

total

 

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

 

$

589,862

 

30

%  

$

538,110

 

24

%  

$

490,495

 

23

%

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

 

277,242

 

14

 

 

280,037

 

13

 

 

211,385

 

10

 

Savings and money market deposits

 

 

830,523

 

42

 

 

720,988

 

32

 

 

657,614

 

31

 

Time deposits less than $250,000

 

 

16,398

 

 1

 

 

3,092

 

 —

 

 

3,492

 

 —

 

Time deposits $250,000 or greater

 

 

6,674

 

 —

 

 

6,954

 

 —

 

 

7,853

 

 —

 

Brokered deposits

 

 

84,601

 

 4

 

 

84,105

 

 4

 

 

168,685

 

 8

 

Deposits from continuing operations

 

 

1,805,300

 

91

 

 

1,633,286

 

73

 

 

1,539,524

 

72

 

Deposits from discontinued operations

 

 

180,593

 

 9

 

 

598,559

 

27

 

 

607,328

 

28

 

Total deposits

 

$

1,985,893

 

100

%  

$

2,231,845

 

100

%  

$

2,146,852

 

100

%

Table 13 - Average Deposits     
(Dollars in thousands)             
  December 31,
  2017 % of total 2016 % of total 2015 % of total 
Non-interest bearing demand deposits $631,046
 29%$559,762
 26%$352,437
 27%
Interest-bearing demand deposits 303,742
 14 279,594
 13 160,452
 12 
Savings and money market deposits 894,029
 42 891,285
 42 585,325
 45 
Time deposits less than $250,000 121,351
 6 180,251
 8 48,832
 4 
Time deposits $250,000 or greater 27,999
 1 28,549
 1 9,301
 1 
Brokered deposits 168,685
 8 207,543
 10 140,416
 11 
  $2,146,852
 100 $2,146,984
 100 $1,296,763
 100 
              
Branch deposits to be assumed in a sale $3,960
   $62,217
   $106,705
   

The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities of time deposits of $250,000 and greater and brokered time deposits.deposits from continuing operations as of December 31, 2019.

Table 14 - Maturities of Time Deposits of $250,000 or More

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

December 31, 2019

Time deposits maturing in:

     

 

 

Three months or less

 

$

 —

Over three through six months

 

 

1,106

Over six through twelve months

 

 

 —

Over twelve months

 

 

5,603

 

 

$

6,709

60

Table 14 - Maturities of Time Deposits of $250,000 or More
(in thousands)  
   
Time deposits maturing in:  
Three months or less $3,086
Over three through six months 1,401
Over six through twelve months 8,158
Over twelve months 7,555
  $20,200

Short-Term Borrowings

There were no outstanding securities sold under repurchase agreements at December 31, 2019. Securities sold under repurchase agreements with commercial checking customers or balances of federal funds purchasedtotaled $6.2 million as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016.

were classified as discontinued operations.  

As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”),FHLB, Atlantic Capital has the ability to acquire short and long-term advances through a blanket agreement secured by our unencumbered qualifying 1-41‑4 family first mortgage loans and by pledging investment securities or individual, qualified loans, subject to approval of the FHLB. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, Atlantic Capital had no FHLB advances of $45.0 million and $110.0 million,outstanding, respectively. The balance of FHLB borrowings decreased due to a decrease in short-term funding needs.

Long-Term Debt

During the third quarter of

On September 28, 2015, Atlantic Capital issued $50.0 million in 6.25% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due in 2025, and callable at par on September 30, 2020, all of which waswere outstanding at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.




2018. The notes bear a fixed rate of 6.25% per year until September 29, 2020, and then bear a floating rate of three month LIBOR plus 468 basis points until maturity.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity Risk Management

Liquidity risk is the risk that an institution will be unable to generate or obtain sufficient funding, at a reasonable cost, to meet operational cash needs and to take advantage of revenue producing opportunities as they arise. Other forms of liquidity risk include market constraints on the ability to convert assets into cash at expected levels, an inability to access funding sources at sufficient levels at a reasonable cost, and changes in economic conditions or exposure to credit, market, operational, legal, and reputation risks that can affect an institution’s liquidity risk profile. Liquidity management involves maintaining Atlantic Capital’s ability to meet the daily cash flow requirements of Atlantic Capital’s customers, both depositors and borrowers.

Atlantic Capital utilizes various measures to monitor and control liquidity risk across three different types of liquidity:

·

tactical liquidity measures the risk of a negative cash flow position whereby cash outflows exceed cash inflows over a short-term horizon;

tactical liquidity measures the risk of a negative cash flow position whereby cash outflows exceed cash inflows over a short-term horizon;

·

structural liquidity measures the amount by which illiquid assets are supported by long-term funding; and

structural liquidity measures the amount by which illiquid assets are supported by long-term funding; and

·

contingent liquidity utilizes cash flow stress testing across four crisis scenarios to determine the adequacy of Atlantic Capital’s liquidity.

contingent liquidity utilizes cash flow stress testing across three crisis scenarios to determine the adequacy of Atlantic Capital’s liquidity.

Atlantic Capital aims to maintain a diverse mix of existing and potential liquidity sources to support the liquidity management function. At its core is a reliance on the customer deposit book,deposits, due to the low cost it offers.costs they offer. Other sources of liquidity include asset-based liquidity in the form of cash and unencumbered securities, as well as access to wholesale funding from external counterparties, primarily advances from the FHLB of Atlanta, Federal Funds lines and other borrowing facilities. Atlantic Capital aims to avoid funding concentrations by diversifying external secured and unsecured funding with respect to maturities, counterparties and nature.

As of At December 31, 2017,2019,  management believed that Atlantic Capital expected to maintainhad sufficient on-balance sheet liquidity to meet its funding needs.

On April 5, 2019, the Bank completed the Branch Sale. FirstBank assumed deposits and customer repurchase agreements of approximately $598 million and purchased approximately $385 million in loans and $12 million in other assets. Since Atlantic Capital divested a larger amount of deposits than assets, it made a cash payment of approximately $167 million to FirstBank at the closing of the Branch Sale. The Company funded the cash payment for the Branch Sale with a combination of excess cash, proceeds from sold securities, FHLB borrowings, and brokered deposits.

61

At December 31, 2017,2019, Atlantic Capital had access to $375.0$526.0 million in unsecured borrowings and $796.6$779.2 million in secured borrowings through various sources.sources, including FHLB advances and access to Federal Funds. Atlantic Capital also has the ability to attract more retail deposits by offering aggressively pricedincreasing rates.

Shareholders’ Equity and Capital Adequacy

Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2019  was $326.5 million, an increase of $2.8 million, or 0.9%, from  December 31, 2018. Net income of $49.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $14.9 million in accumulated other comprehensive income and $1.8 million in issues of common stock for option exercises and long-term incentives were offset by $64.8 million due to the repurchase of 3,694,902 shares of common stock. The Bank paid intercompany dividends totaling $45.5 million to Atlantic Capital during 2019 in order to fund the repurchases. Atlantic Capital and the Bank are required to meet minimum capital requirements imposed by regulatory authorities. Failure to meet certain capital requirements may result in actions by regulatory agencies that could have a material impact on Atlantic Capital’s consolidated financial statements.

Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2017 was $308.4 million, an increase of $4.8 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2016.

Accumulated other comprehensive income, which includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and unrealized gains and losses on derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges, is excluded in the calculation of regulatory capital ratios.

Table 15 - Capital Ratios

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regulatory Guidelines

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum capital 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

Bank

 

 

 

 

 

plus capital 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

 

 

 

Well

 

conservation buffer 

 

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2019

    

2018

    

Minimum

    

capitalized

    

2020

 

Risk based ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common equity tier 1 capital

 

 

12.0

%  

 

11.5

%  

 

13.8

%  

 

12.3

%  

4.5

%  

6.5

%  

7.0

%

Tier 1 Capital

 

 

12.0

 

 

11.5

 

 

13.8

 

 

12.3

 

6.0

 

8.0

 

8.5

 

Total capital

 

 

15.0

 

 

14.2

 

 

14.6

 

 

13.0

 

8.0

 

10.0

 

10.5

 

Leverage ratio

 

 

11.0

 

 

10.0

 

 

12.7

 

 

10.6

 

4.0

 

5.0

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common equity tier 1 capital

 

$

285,456

 

$

285,250

 

$

327,426

 

$

304,907

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Tier 1 capital

 

 

285,456

 

 

285,250

 

 

327,426

 

 

304,907

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total capital

 

 

354,757

 

 

353,458

 

 

346,854

 

 

323,411

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk weighted assets

 

 

2,372,001

 

 

2,489,631

 

 

2,371,384

 

 

2,489,373

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Quarterly average total assets for leverage ratio

 

 

2,589,910

 

 

2,842,618

 

 

2,585,629

 

 

2,864,357

 

  

 

  

 

  

 




Table 15 - Capital Ratios           
(Dollars in thousands)             
   Consolidated  Bank Regulatory Guidelines 
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Minimum Well capitalized Minimum capital plus capital conservation buffer 2019 
Risk based ratios:               
Common equity tier 1 capital 11.2
%10.3
%12.7
%11.8
%4.5
%6.5
%7.0
%
Tier 1 capital 11.2
 10.3
 12.7
 11.8
 6.0
 8.0
 8.5
 
Total capital 14.1
 13.3
 13.6
 12.7
 8.0
 10.0
 10.5
 
Leverage ratio 9.7
 9.1
 11.1
 10.4
 4.0
 5.0
 N/A
 
                
Common equity tier 1 capital $259,865
 $241,313
 $295,629
 $276,778
       
Tier 1 capital 259,865
 241,313
 295,629
 276,778
       
Total capital 329,641
 311,954
 315,870
 298,053
       
                
Risk weighted assets 2,330,574
 2,343,622
 2,330,171
 2,344,387
       
Quarterly average total assets for leverage ratio 2,667,652
 2,654,473
 2,675,228
 2,654,473
       

As of December 31, 2019, Atlantic Capital continues to exceed minimum capital standards and the Bank remainsremained “well-capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See “Item 1. Business–Supervision and Regulation–Capital Adequacy” above for additional information.

In July 2013, bank regulatory agencies approved the Basel III capital guidelines, which are aimed at strengthening existing capital requirements for bank holding companies through a combination of higher minimum capital requirements, new capital conservation buffers and more conservative definitions of capital and balance sheet exposure. Atlantic Capital and the Bank became subject to the requirements of Basel III effective January 1, 2015, subject to a transition period for several aspects of the rule.
Under the revised rules, Atlantic Capital’s tier 1 common equity ratio was 11.2% at December 31, 2017, compared to the fully phased-in, well-capitalized minimum of 7.0%, which includes the 2.5% minimum conservation buffer.

Management continues to monitor Basel III developments and remains committed to managing Atlantic Capital’s capital levels in a prudent manner.

62

Table 16 - Tier 1 Common Equity Under Basel III
(Dollars in thousands)   
    
  December 31, 2017 
Tier 1 capital $259,865
 
Less: restricted core capital 
 
Tier 1 common equity $259,865
 
    
Risk-weighted assets $2,330,574
 
Tier 1 common equity ratio 11.2
%

Table 16 - Tier 1 Common Equity Under Basel III

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31, 2019

 

Tier 1 capital

 

$

285,456

 

Less: restricted core capital

 

 

 —

 

Tier 1 common equity

 

$

285,456

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-adjusted assets

 

$

2,372,001

 

Tier 1 common equity ratio

 

 

12.0

%



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Atlantic Capital makes contractual commitments to extend credit and issues standby letters of credit in the ordinary course of its business activities. These commitments are legally binding agreements to lend money to customers at predetermined interest rates for a specified period of time. In addition to commitments to extend credit, Atlantic Capital also issues standby letters of credit which are assurances to a third party that it will not suffer a loss if the customer fails to meet a contractual obligation to the third party. At December 31, 2017,2019, Atlantic Capital had issued commitments to extend credit of approximately $689.8$735.9 million and standby letters of credit of approximately $11.0$8.1 million through various types of commercial lending arrangements.

Based on historical experience, many of the commitments and letters of credit will expire unfunded. Through its various sources of liquidity, Atlantic Capital believes it will be able to fund these obligations as they arise. Atlantic Capital evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is based on Atlantic Capital’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and commercial and residential real estate.

Contractual Obligations

There have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations during the year ended December 31, 20172019 as compared to Atlantic Capital’s fiscalthe year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Table 17 sets forth certain information about contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2017.2019.

Table 17 - Contractual Obligations

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period at December 31, 2019

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

More than 5 

    

 

 

 

 

Less than 1 year

 

1‑3 years

 

3‑5 years

 

years

 

Total

Time deposits

 

$

38,560

 

$

5,757

 

$

44

 

$

28

 

$

44,389

Brokered time deposits

 

 

2,571

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,571

Deposits without a stated maturity

 

 

2,452,086

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,452,086

Operating lease obligations

 

 

2,062

 

 

4,594

 

 

2,025

 

 

11,374

 

 

20,055

Other borrowings

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Long-term debt

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

50,000

 

 

50,000

Total contractual cash obligations

 

$

2,495,279

 

$

10,351

 

$

2,069

 

$

61,402

 

$

2,569,101

63

Table 17 - Contractual Obligations        
(in thousands)          
           
  Payments Due by Period at December 31, 2017
  Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years Total
Time deposits $73,022
 $53,731
 $11,817
 $42
 $138,612
Brokered time deposits 10,324
 5,098
 
 
 15,422
Deposits without a stated maturity 2,296,631
 
 
 
 2,296,631
Operating lease obligations 2,509
 3,629
 3,743
 9,013
 18,894
Other borrowings 45,000
 
 
 
 45,000
Long-term debt 
 
 
 50,000
 50,000
Total contractual cash obligations $2,427,486
 $62,458
 $15,560
 $59,055
 $2,564,559

RISK MANAGEMENT

Effective risk management is critical to Atlantic Capital’s success. The Dodd-Frank Act requires that bank holding companies with total assets in excess of $10 billion establish an enterprise-wide risk committee consisting of members of its board of directors. Although Atlantic Capital does not have total assets in excess of $10 billion, the Audit Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee of the Bank’s board of directors has an Audit and Risk Committee that, among other responsibilities, providesprovide oversight of enterprise-wide risk management activities. The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the Bank’sThese committees review our activities in identifying, measuring, and mitigating existing and emerging risks (including credit, liquidity, interest-rate, compliance, operational, strategic, financial and reputational risks.) The committee monitors management’s execution of risk management practices in accordance with the board of directors’ risk appetite, reviews supervisory examination reports together with management’s response to such examinations and discusses legal matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements or Atlantic Capital’s compliance policies. With guidance from and oversight by the Audit Committee and the Bank’s Audit and Risk Committee, management continually refines and enhances its risk management policies and procedures to maintain effective risk management programs and processes.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of not collecting payments pursuant to the contractual terms of loans, leases, investment securities and investment securities.derivative instruments. Atlantic Capital’s independent creditloan review function conducts risk reviews and analyses of loans to help assure compliance with credit policies and to monitor asset quality trends.The risk reviews include portfolio analysis by geographic location, industry, collateral type and product. Atlantic Capital strives to identify potential problem loans as early as possible, to record charge-offs or write-downs as appropriate and to maintain adequate allowances for loan losses that are inherent in the loan portfolio.



Market Risk

Market risk reflects the risk of economic loss resulting from adverse changes in market price and interest rates. This risk of loss can be reflected in diminished current market values and/or reduced potential net interest income in future periods. Atlantic Capital’s market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in Atlantic Capital’s lending and deposit-taking activities. The structure of Atlantic Capital’s loan and deposit portfolios is such that a significant decline in interest rates may adversely impact net market values and net interest income. Atlantic Capital does not maintain a trading account nor is Atlantic Capital subject to currency exchange risk or commodity price risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk results principally from assets and liabilities maturing or repricing at different points in time, from assets and liabilities repricing at the same point in time but in different amounts and from short-term and long-term interest rates changing in different magnitudes. Market interest rates also have an impact on the interest rate and repricing characteristics of loans that are originated as well as the rate characteristics of interest-bearing liabilities.

Atlantic Capital assesses interest rate risk by forecasting net interest income under various interest rate scenarios and comparing those results to forecasted net interest income assuming stable rates. Atlantic Capital’s rate shock simulation, as of December 31, 2017, indicates that, over a 12-month period, net interest income is estimated to increase by 15.64% withWith rates rising, 200-basis points. Thethe estimated increase in net interest income is primarily due to the short-term repricing characteristics of the loan portfolio, combined with a favorable funding mix. Atlantic Capital’s loan book consists mainly of floating rate loans. Atlantic Capital’s core client deposits are likely to allow Atlantic Capital to lag short term interbank rate indices when pricing deposits. Transaction accounts comprise a significant amount of Atlantic Capital’s total deposits.

64

Table 18 provides the impact on net interest income resulting from various interest rate shock scenarios as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

Table 18 - Net Interest Income Sensitivity Simulation Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated change in net interest income

 

Change in interest rate (basis point)

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

 

‑200

 

(17.56)

%

(19.60)

%

‑100

 

(9.88)

 

(7.17)

 

+100

 

9.83

 

6.92

 

+200

 

19.24

 

13.52

 

+300

 

28.28

 

20.06

 

Table 18 - Net Interest Income Sensitivity Simulation Analysis  
         
  Estimated increase in net interest income
Change in interest rate (basis point) December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
-100 (10.68)%  (8.59)% 
+100 7.68
   8.20
  
+200 15.64
   16.39
  
+300 23.30
   20.34
  

Increases in year-end deposits that led to temporarily high cash balances at December 31, 2019 contributed to the increase in asset sensitivity compared to December 31, 2018.

Atlantic Capital also utilizes the market value of equity (MVE) as a tool in measuring and managing interest rate risk. Long-termLong-term interest rate risk exposure is measured using the MVE sensitivity analysis to study the impact of long-term cash flows on capital. As of December 31, 2017, the MVE calculated with a 200-basis point shock up in rates increased by 1.38% from the base case MVE value. Table 19 presents the MVE profile as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016.2018.

Table 19 - Market Value of Equity Modeling Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated % change in MVE

 

Change in interest rate (basis point)

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

 

‑200

 

(6.13)

%  

(9.44)

%

‑100

 

(3.73)

 

(3.73)

 

+100

 

2.58

 

1.44

 

+200

 

1.71

 

1.68

 

+300

 

0.68

 

1.41

 

Table 19 - Market Value of Equity Modeling Analysis   
         
  Estimated % change in MVE
Change in interest rate (basis point) December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
-100 (3.09)%  0.90
% 
+100 1.31
   (2.39)  
+200 1.38
   (4.52)  
+300 0.59
   (5.94)  

Atlantic Capital may utilize interest rate swaps, floors, collars or other derivative financial instruments in an attempt to manage Atlantic Capital’s overall sensitivity to changes in interest rates.



ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information required by this item is included in Part II, Item“Item 7 of this report under “Management’s– Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Operations – Risk Management.”Management” of this report.


65



ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 16, 2020


66

Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2018




Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

(in thousands, except share data)

    

2019

    

2018

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

45,249

 

$

42,895

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

 

 

421,079

 

 

216,040

Other short-term investments

 

 

 —

 

 

9,457

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

466,328

 

 

268,392

Investment securities available for sale

 

 

282,461

 

 

402,486

Investment securities held to maturity (fair value $115,291 and $0 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively)

 

 

116,972

 

 

 —

Other investments

 

 

27,556

 

 

29,236

Loans held for sale

 

 

370

 

 

5,889

Loans held for sale - discontinued operations(1)

 

 

 

 

373,030

Loans held for investment

 

 

1,873,524

 

 

1,728,073

Less: Allowance for loan losses

 

 

(18,535)

 

 

(17,851)

Loans held for investment, net

 

 

1,854,989

 

 

1,710,222

Premises held for sale - discontinued operations(1)

 

 

 

 

7,722

Premises and equipment, net

 

 

22,536

 

 

9,779

Bank owned life insurance

 

 

66,421

 

 

65,149

Goodwill - discontinued operations(1)

 

 

 

 

4,555

Goodwill - continuing operations(1)

 

 

19,925

 

 

17,135

Other intangibles, net

 

 

3,027

 

 

4,388

Other real estate owned

 

 

278

 

 

874

Other assets

 

 

49,516

 

 

56,583

Total assets

 

$

2,910,379

 

$

2,955,440

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

 

  

    

 

  

Deposits:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Noninterest-bearing demand

 

$

824,646

 

$

602,252

Interest-bearing checking

 

 

373,727

 

 

252,490

Savings

 

 

1,219

 

 

725

Money market

 

 

1,173,218

 

 

987,183

Time

 

 

44,389

 

 

10,623

Brokered deposits

 

 

81,847

 

 

99,241

Deposits to be assumed - discontinued operations(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

585,429

Total deposits

 

 

2,499,046

 

 

2,537,943

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - discontinued operations(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

6,220

Long-term debt

 

 

49,873

 

 

49,704

Other liabilities

 

 

34,965

 

 

37,920

Total liabilities

 

 

2,583,884

 

 

2,631,787

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

  

Preferred Stock, no par value - 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

Common stock, no par value - 100,000,000 shares authorized; 21,751,026 and 25,290,419 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

 

 

230,265

 

 

291,771

Retained earnings

 

 

91,669

 

 

42,187

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

4,561

 

 

(10,305)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

 

326,495

 

 

323,653

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$

2,910,379

 

$

2,955,440


(in thousands, except share data)December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
ASSETS   
Cash and due from banks$38,086
 $36,790
Interest-bearing deposits in banks281,247
 118,039
Other short-term investments10,681
 10,896
Cash and cash equivalents330,014
 165,725
Securities available-for-sale449,117
 347,705
Other investments32,174
 23,806
Loans held for sale1,487
 35,219
Loans1,933,839
 1,981,330
Less: Allowance for loan losses(19,344) (20,595)
Loans, net1,914,495
 1,960,735
Branch premises held for sale
 2,995
Premises and equipment, net12,054
 11,958
Bank owned life insurance63,667
 62,160
Goodwill and intangible assets, net27,633
 29,567
Other real estate owned1,215
 1,872
Other assets59,565
 85,801
Total assets$2,891,421
 $2,727,543

(1)

Assets and liabilities related to the sale of Tennessee and northwest Georgia banking operations were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2018.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

67

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Deposits:   
Noninterest-bearing demand$732,442
 $643,471
Interest-bearing checking306,331
 264,062
Savings26,573
 27,932
Money market1,117,891
 912,493
Time138,612
 157,810
Brokered deposits128,816
 200,223
Total deposits2,450,665
 2,205,991
Deposits to be assumed in branch sale
 31,589
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings45,000
 110,000
Long-term debt49,535
 49,366
Other liabilities37,796
 26,939
Total liabilities2,582,996
 2,423,885
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
Common stock, no par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 25,712,909 and 25,093,135 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively299,474
 292,747
Retained earnings12,810
 16,536
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(3,859) (5,625)
Total shareholders’ equity308,425
 303,658
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$2,891,421
 $2,727,543


Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

INTEREST INCOME

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Loans, including fees

 

$

93,022

 

$

80,110

 

$

64,436

Investment securities

 

 

9,559

 

 

10,912

 

 

9,181

Interest and dividends on other interest-earning assets

 

 

3,266

 

 

3,738

 

 

2,201

Total interest income

 

 

105,847

 

 

94,760

 

 

75,818

INTEREST EXPENSE

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Interest on deposits

 

 

20,392

 

 

12,506

 

 

7,934

Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances

 

 

817

 

 

2,399

 

 

1,536

Interest on federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

 

 

479

 

 

304

 

 

222

Interest on long-term debt

 

 

3,295

 

 

3,304

 

 

3,294

Total interest expense

 

 

24,983

 

 

18,513

 

 

12,986

NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

 

80,864

 

 

76,247

 

 

62,832

Provision for loan losses

 

 

2,712

 

 

1,946

 

 

3,218

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

 

78,152

 

 

74,301

 

 

59,614

NONINTEREST INCOME

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Service charges

 

 

3,587

 

 

3,215

 

 

2,734

Gain (loss) on sales of securities

 

 

907

 

 

(1,855)

 

 

(63)

Gain (loss) on sales of other assets

 

 

127

 

 

(154)

 

 

742

Trust income

 

 

 —

 

 

1,025

 

 

1,814

Derivatives (loss) income

 

 

(322)

 

 

308

 

 

156

Bank owned life insurance

 

 

1,546

 

 

1,506

 

 

1,530

SBA lending activities

 

 

4,178

 

 

3,606

 

 

4,129

Gain on sale of trust business

 

 

 —

 

 

1,681

 

 

 —

Other noninterest income

 

 

702

 

 

715

 

 

1,137

Total noninterest income

 

 

10,725

 

 

10,047

 

 

12,179

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Salaries and employee benefits

 

 

34,537

 

 

31,766

 

 

33,130

Occupancy

 

 

2,888

 

 

2,972

 

 

2,516

Equipment and software

 

 

3,103

 

 

2,817

 

 

2,341

Professional services

 

 

2,908

 

 

3,511

 

 

4,591

Postage, printing and supplies

 

 

137

 

 

166

 

 

244

Communications and data processing

 

 

3,199

 

 

2,676

 

 

2,625

Marketing and business development

 

 

845

 

 

710

 

 

798

FDIC premiums

 

 

217

 

 

562

 

 

697

Merger and conversion costs

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

304

Other noninterest expense

 

 

5,274

 

 

4,811

 

 

5,588

Total noninterest expense

 

 

53,108

 

 

49,991

 

 

52,834

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

 

 

35,769

 

 

34,357

 

 

18,959

Provision for income taxes

 

 

7,611

 

 

6,307

 

 

23,715

NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

28,158

 

 

28,050

 

 

(4,756)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

28,690

 

$

643

 

$

1,689

Provision for income taxes

 

 

6,993

 

 

161

 

 

659

Net income from discontinued operations

 

 

21,697

 

 

482

 

 

1,030

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

49,855

 

$

28,532

 

$

(3,726)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share basic

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net income (loss) per common share - continuing operations

 

$

1.21

 

$

1.08

 

$

(0.19)

Net income per common share - discontinued operations

 

 

0.93

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.04

Net income (loss) per Common Share basic

 

$

2.14

 

$

1.10

 

$

(0.15)

Net income (loss) per common share diluted

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net income (loss) per common share - continuing operations

 

$

1.20

 

$

1.07

 

$

(0.19)

Net income per common share - discontinued operations

 

 

0.92

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.04

Net income (loss) per common share diluted

 

$

2.12

 

$

1.09

 

$

(0.15)



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

68

  Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share data) 2017 2016 2015
INTEREST INCOME      
Loans, including fees $84,889
 $80,781
 $44,562
Investment securities available-for-sale 9,181
 5,698
 3,301
Interest and dividends on other interest-earning assets 2,201
 1,738
 1,104
Total interest income 96,271
 88,217
 48,967
INTEREST EXPENSE      
Interest on deposits 10,077
 7,399
 3,618
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances 1,536
 558
 290
Interest on federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 222
 229
 79
Interest on long-term debt 3,294
 3,285
 858
Other 
 38
 78
Total interest expense 15,129
 11,509
 4,923
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 81,142
 76,708
 44,044
Provision for loan losses 3,218
 3,816
 8,035
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 77,924
 72,892
 36,009
NONINTEREST INCOME      
Service charges 5,076
 5,487
 2,613
Gain (loss) on sales of securities (63) 44
 10
Gain on sale of other assets 742
 388
 189
Mortgage income 1,255
 1,917
 163
Trust income 1,814
 1,411
 192
Derivatives income 156
 578
 304
Bank owned life insurance 1,530
 1,610
 2,159
SBA lending activities 4,129
 3,642
 2,910
TriNet lending activities 87
 1,501
 
Gains on sale of branches 302
 3,885
 
Other noninterest income 1,161
 1,269
 859
Total noninterest income 16,189
 21,732
 9,399
NONINTEREST EXPENSE      
Salaries and employee benefits 45,375
 42,303
 24,098
Occupancy 4,589
 4,604
 2,170
Equipment and software 3,449
 2,966
 1,295
Professional services 4,752
 2,918
 1,610
Postage, printing and supplies 340
 462
 178
Communications and data processing 4,149
 3,291
 1,541
Marketing and business development 946
 1,100
 410
FDIC premiums 966
 1,568
 789
Merger and conversion costs 304
 2,742
 9,154
Amortization of intangibles 1,653
 2,445
 526
Foreclosed property/problem asset expense 124
 864
 70
Other noninterest expense 6,818
 8,017
 4,092
Total noninterest expense 73,465
 73,280
 45,933
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 20,648
 21,344
 (525)
Provision for income taxes 24,374
 7,949
 794
NET (LOSS) INCOME $(3,726) $13,395
 $(1,319)
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE:      
Net (loss) income per share – basic $(0.15) $0.54
 $(0.09)
Net (loss) income per share – diluted $(0.15) $0.53
 $(0.09)


Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31, 

(in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Net income

 

$

49,855

 

$

28,532

 

$

(3,726)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax of $3,974, ($2,018), and $1,491, respectively

 

 

11,914

 

 

(6,052)

 

 

2,385

Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income net of tax of ($227),  $464, and $70, respectively

 

 

(680)

 

 

1,391

 

 

111

Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax

 

 

11,234

 

 

(4,661)

 

 

2,496

Cash flow hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $1,211, ($313), and ($457), respectively

 

 

3,632

 

 

(941)

 

 

(730)

Changes from cash flow hedges

 

 

3,632

 

 

(941)

 

 

(730)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

14,866

 

 

(5,602)

 

 

1,766

Comprehensive income

 

$

64,721

 

$

22,930

 

$

(1,960)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


69


 Year Ended
 December 31,
(in thousands)2017 2016 2015
Net (loss) income$(3,726) $13,395
 $(1,319)
Other comprehensive income (loss)     
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities:     
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax of $1,491, ($2,403) and ($1,578), respectively2,385
 (3,824) (2,548)
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income net of tax of $70, ($17) and ($4), respectively111
 (27) (6)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax2,496
 (3,851) (2,554)
Derivatives:     
Net unrealized derivative (losses) gains, net of tax of ($457), ($160) and $266, respectively(730) (258) 429
Changes from derivatives(730) (258) 429
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax1,766
 (4,109) (2,125)
Comprehensive (loss) income$(1,960) $9,286
 $(3,444)







Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except share data)

    

Shares

    

Amount

    

Earnings

    

Income (Loss)

    

Total

Balance - December 31, 2016

 

25,093,135

 

$

292,747

 

$

16,536

 

$

(5,625)

 

$

303,658

Comprehensive income:

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,726)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,726)

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,496

 

 

2,496

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(730)

 

 

(730)

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

(1,960)

Net issuance of restricted stock

 

71,974

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Issuance of common stock for option exercises

 

486,001

 

 

3,567

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,567

Issuance of common stock for long-term incentive plan

 

61,799

 

 

1,209

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,209

Restricted stock activity

 

 —

 

 

810

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

810

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

1,141

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,141

Balance - December 31, 2017

 

25,712,909

 

$

299,474

 

$

12,810

 

$

(3,859)

 

$

308,425

Comprehensive (loss) income:

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

28,532

 

 

 —

 

 

28,532

Reclassification of tax effects from AOCI

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

844

 

 

(844)

 

 

 —

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(4,661)

 

 

(4,661)

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(941)

 

 

(941)

Total comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

22,930

Change in accounting principle - revenue recognition

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 1

 

 

 —

 

 

 1

Net issuance of restricted stock

 

68,730

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Issuance of common stock for option exercises

 

292,039

 

 

4,097

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,097

Issuance of common stock for long-term incentive plan

 

38,841

 

 

687

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

687

Restricted stock activity

 

 —

 

 

1,158

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,158

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

242

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

242

Performance share compensation

 

 —

 

 

290

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

290

Stock repurchases

 

(822,100)

 

 

(14,177)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(14,177)

Balance - December 31, 2018

 

25,290,419

 

$

291,771

 

$

42,187

 

$

(10,305)

 

$

323,653

Comprehensive (loss) income:

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

49,855

 

 

 —

 

 

49,855

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,234

 

 

11,234

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,632

 

 

3,632

Total comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

64,721

Change in accounting principle - leases

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(373)

 

 

 —

 

 

(373)

Net issuance of restricted stock

 

49,702

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Issuance of common stock for option exercises

 

70,129

 

 

1,153

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,153

Issuance of common stock for long-term incentive plan

 

35,678

 

 

655

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

655

Restricted stock activity

 

 —

 

 

908

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

908

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

169

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

169

Performance share compensation

 

 —

 

 

422

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

422

Stock repurchases

 

(3,694,902)

 

 

(64,813)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(64,813)

Balance - December 31, 2019

 

21,751,026

 

$

230,265

 

$

91,669

 

$

4,561

 

$

326,495

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


70

  Common Stock        
(in thousands, except share data) Shares Amount Retained Earnings 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Treasury Stock Total
Balance - December 31, 2014 13,497,118
 $136,335
 $4,460
 $609
 $(475) $140,929
Comprehensive (loss) income:            
Net loss 
 
 (1,319) 
 
 (1,319)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net 
 
 
 (2,554) 
 (2,554)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges 
 
 
 429
 
 429
Total comprehensive (loss) income           (3,444)
Acquisition of treasury stock 
 
 
 
 (707) (707)
Issuance of restricted stock 151,891
 
 
 
 
 
Cancellation of treasury shares (121,248) (1,182) 
 
 1,182
 
Issuance of common stock for acquisition of First Security Group 8,790,193
 121,305
 
 
 
 121,305
Issuance of common stock in private placement 1,984,127
 24,004
 
 
 
 24,004
Issuance of common stock for option exercises 20,707
 39
 
 
 
 39
Issuance of common stock for long-term incentive plan 102,758
 1,285
 
 
 
 1,285
Acquisition consideration for acquired awards 
 2,705
 
 
 
 2,705
Restricted stock activity 
 702
 
 
 
 702
Stock-based compensation 
 1,174
 
 
 
 1,174
Balance - December 31, 2015 24,425,546
 $286,367
 $3,141
 $(1,516) $
 $287,992
Comprehensive income:            
Net income 
 
 13,395
 
 
 13,395
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net 
 
 
 (3,851) 
 (3,851)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges 
 
 
 (258) 
 (258)
Total comprehensive income (loss)           9,286
Issuance of restricted stock 89,165
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock for option exercises 512,275
 3,947
 
 
 
 3,947
Issuance of common stock for long-term incentive plan 66,149
 884
 
 
 
 884
Restricted stock activity 
 612
 
 
 
 612
Stock-based compensation 
 937
 
 
 
 937
Balance - December 31, 2016 25,093,135
 $292,747
 $16,536
 $(5,625) $
 $303,658
Comprehensive (loss) income:            
Net loss 
 
 (3,726) 
 
 (3,726)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net 
 
 
 2,496
 
 2,496
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges 
 
 
 (730) 
 (730)
Total comprehensive (loss) income           (1,960)
Issuance of restricted stock 71,974
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock for option exercises 486,001
 3,567
 
 
 
 3,567
Issuance of common stock for long-term incentive plan 61,799
 1,209
 
 
 
 1,209
Restricted stock activity 
 810
 
 
 
 810
Stock-based compensation 
 1,141
 
 
 
 1,141
Balance - December 31, 2017 25,712,909
 $299,474
 $12,810
 $(3,859) $
 $308,425
             



Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

December 31, 

(in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

28,158

 

$

28,050

 

$

(4,756)

Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

21,697

 

 

482

 

 

1,030

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Provision for loan losses

 

 

2,712

 

 

1,946

 

 

3,218

Depreciation, amortization, and accretion

 

 

3,361

 

 

4,671

 

 

5,287

Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

2,004

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Amortization of restricted stock and performance share compensation

 

 

1,330

 

 

1,448

 

 

810

Stock option compensation

 

 

169

 

 

242

 

 

1,141

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

10,381

 

 

2,226

 

 

24,241

(Gain) loss on sales of available-for-sale securities

 

 

(907)

 

 

1,855

 

 

63

(Gain) loss on disposition of premises and equipment, net

 

 

27

 

 

214

 

 

359

Net write downs and (gains) losses on sales of other real estate owned

 

 

(154)

 

 

222

 

 

(288)

Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) impairment

 

 

26

 

 

228

 

 

 —

Gain on sale of tax credit

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(426)

Net increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance

 

 

(1,474)

 

 

(1,482)

 

 

(1,507)

(Gain) on bank owned life insurance

 

 

(46)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Net (gains) on sale of branches

 

 

(34,475)

 

 

 —

 

 

(302)

Net (gain) on sale of trust business

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,681)

 

 

 —

Origination of servicing assets

 

 

(1,226)

 

 

(823)

 

 

(1,022)

Proceeds from sales of SBA loans

 

 

68,748

 

 

56,620

 

 

47,135

Net (gains) on sale of SBA loans

 

 

(3,594)

 

 

(3,089)

 

 

(3,045)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities -

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net change in loans held for sale

 

 

5,519

 

 

(776)

 

 

9,374

Net change in operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

(3,883)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Net (increase) decrease in other assets

 

 

(2,385)

 

 

6,511

 

 

(8,217)

Net decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

(13,410)

 

 

720

 

 

12,089

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

82,578

 

 

97,584

 

 

85,184

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Activity in securities available-for-sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Prepayments

 

 

40,342

 

 

50,380

 

 

47,393

Maturities and calls

 

 

5,430

 

 

365

 

 

5,894

Sales

 

 

116,963

 

 

62,087

 

 

19,238

Purchases

 

 

(28,282)

 

 

(77,036)

 

 

(173,391)

Activity in securities held to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

(117,043)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Net change in loans held for investment

 

 

(212,730)

 

 

(270,097)

 

 

(52,266)

Net change in assets held for sale - discontinued operations

 

 

(11,789)

 

 

42,412

 

 

50,774

(Purchases) proceeds of Federal Home Loan Bank stock, net

 

 

(58)

 

 

1,766

 

 

2,679

(Purchases) proceeds of Federal Reserve Bank stock, net

 

 

(92)

 

 

(114)

 

 

(102)

Proceeds from bank owned life insurance benefits

 

 

248

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned

 

 

847

 

 

496

 

 

1,403

Net cash received (paid) for branch divestiture

 

 

(166,755)

 

 

 —

 

 

5,379

Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment

 

 

 —

 

 

 2

 

 

 —

(Purchases) of premises and equipment, net

 

 

(1,155)

 

 

(7,884)

 

 

(2,112)

Net cash (used in) investing activities

 

 

(374,074)

 

 

(197,623)

 

 

(95,111)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net change in deposits

 

 

546,532

 

 

87,379

 

 

289,897

Net change in liabilities to be assumed - discontinued operations

 

 

6,560

 

 

6,119

 

 

(54,248)

Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances

 

 

738,000

 

 

1,435,100

 

 

1,734,000

Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances

 

 

(738,000)

 

 

(1,480,100)

 

 

(1,799,000)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

1,153

 

 

4,096

 

 

3,567

Repurchase of common stock

 

 

(64,813)

 

 

(14,177)

 

 

 —

Net cash (provided by) financing activities

 

 

489,432

 

 

38,417

 

 

174,216

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

197,936

 

 

(61,622)

 

 

164,289

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – beginning of period

 

 

268,392

 

 

330,014

 

 

165,725

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – end of period

 

$

466,328

 

$

268,392

 

$

330,014

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

26,960

 

$

22,562

 

$

15,212

Income taxes paid

 

 

2,190

 

 

270

 

 

898

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


71

 Year Ended
 December 31,
(in thousands)2017 2016 2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES     
Net income (loss)$(3,726) $13,395
 $(1,319)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities     
Provision for loan losses3,218
 3,816
 8,035
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion5,287
 6,017
 2,390
Amortization of restricted stock compensation810
 612
 659
Stock option compensation1,141
 937
 1,175
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)24,242
 3,322
 (680)
(Gain) loss on sales of securities63
 (44) (10)
(Gain) loss on sales and disposals of premises and equipment, net359
 (52) 13
Net write downs and losses (gains) on sales of other real estate owned(288) 417
 (189)
Gain on sale of tax credit(426) 
 
Net increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance(1,507) (1,561) (1,029)
Gain on bank owned life insurance
 (27) (1,112)
Net gains on sale of branches(302) (3,885) 
Origination of servicing rights(1,022) (1,483) (1,301)
Proceeds from sales of SBA loans47,135
 49,507
 41,857
Net gains on sale of SBA loans(3,045) (2,138) (1,732)
Proceeds from sales of TriNet loans
 133,183
 60,305
Net gains on sale of TriNet loans
 (1,095) 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities -     
Net change in loans held for sale9,374
 (71,425) (75,848)
Net (increase) decrease in other assets(8,184) (7,187) (3,074)
Net increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities12,089
 (8,970) 5,081
Net cash provided by operating activities85,218
 113,339
 33,221
INVESTING ACTIVITIES     
Activity in securities:     
Prepayments47,393
 43,063
 24,025
Maturities and calls5,894
 27,052
 9,734
Sales19,238
 65,103
 23,088
Purchases(173,391) (146,741) (72,085)
Net change in loans held for investment(1,526) (275,721) (25,293)
Net cash paid for acquisitions
 
 (20,377)
(Purchases) proceeds of Federal Home Loan Bank stock, net2,679
 (6,019) 5,966
(Purchases) proceeds of Federal Reserve Bank stock, net(102) (3,075) (4,061)
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance benefits
 36
 1,886
Proceeds from sales of other real estate1,403
 2,002
 2,060
Net cash received (paid) for branch divestitures5,379
 (140,295) 
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
 5,649
 837
(Purchases) of premises and equipment, net(2,112) (1,109) (646)
Net cash used in investing activities(95,145) (430,055) (54,866)


 Year Ended
 December 31,
(in thousands)2017 2016 2015
FINANCING ACTIVITIES     
Net change in deposits235,649
 165,609
 186,351
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances1,734,000
 1,490,000
 638,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances(1,799,000) (1,380,000) (767,407)
Issuance of subordinated debentures
 
 50,000
Proceeds from exercise of stock options3,567
 3,947
 39
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs
 
 24,004
Acquisition of treasury stock
 
 (707)
Net cash provided by financing activities174,216
 279,556
 130,280
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS164,289
 (37,160) 108,635
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – beginning of period165,725
 202,885
 94,250
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – end of period$330,014
 $165,725
 $202,885
      
 Year Ended
 December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOWS     
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest$15,212
 $11,598
 $3,532
Income taxes898
 3,974
 5,927
Assets acquired in business combinations
 
 1,244,541
Liabilities assumed in business combinations
 
 1,076,138
Issuance of common stock in acquisitions
 
 121,305



ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


NOTE 1 – ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Basis of Presentation

The accounting and financial reporting policies of Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. (“Atlantic Capital”) and its subsidiary conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and general banking industry practices. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. On October 31, 2015, Atlantic Capital completed its acquisition of First Security Group, Inc. and its subsidiary FSGBank, N.A. (together, “First Security”). In connection with the acquisition, Atlantic Capital’s subsidiary Atlantic Capital Bank, a Georgia chartered commercial bank merged with and into FSGBank, N.A, which subsequently changed its name to Atlantic Capital Bank, N.A. The consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations of Atlantic Capital and Atlantic Capital Bank (the “Bank”) for the full twelve months of 2015, and include the results of operations of First Security subsequent to the acquisition. In connection with the acquisition, Atlantic Capital issued approximately 8,790,193 shares of common stock as partial consideration to former shareholders of First Security, with the remaining consideration consisting of approximately $47.1 million in cash. See Note 3 to the Audited Financial Statements for additional information.

In management’s opinion, all accounting adjustments necessary to accurately reflect the financial position and results of operations on the accompanying financial statements have been made. These adjustments are normal and recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair and accurate presentation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

As discussed in Note 3 - Divestitures and Discontinued Operations, prior periods presented in the consolidated statements of operations as well as the related note disclosures covering income and expense amounts have been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The consolidated balance sheets and related note disclosures for prior periods also reflect the reclassification of certain assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations to held for sale.

Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, commercial paper, federal funds sold and reverse repurchase agreements. Generally, cash and cash equivalents have maturities of three months or less and, accordingly, the carrying amount of these instruments is deemed to be a reasonable estimate of fair value. Reverse repurchase agreements are not subject to netting and offset with repurchase agreements.

Investment Securities Available-For-Sale

Investment securities designated as available-for-sale are stated at fair value. Investment securities available-for-sale include securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, liquidity needs, or for other purposes. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts. Interest income and dividends on securities are recognized in interest income on an accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment of the yield. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and the cost of securities sold is derived using the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on securities available-for-sale are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

Available-for-sale securities

Securities are reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). A security is considered to be impaired if the fair value is less than its amortized cost basis at the measurement date. The Company determines whether a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis is other-than-temporary. The Company determines whether it has the intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these conditions is met, the Company must recognize the entire impairment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and write the debt security down to fair value. For debt securities which the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security and which do not meet either condition, an OTTI loss is considered to have occurred. The credit loss portion of impairment is recorded as a realized loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the temporary impairment related to all other factors is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of shareholders’ equity.

72

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock/Federal Reserve Bank Stock

The Company holds stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”). The Company accounts for the stock based on the industry guidance in Accounting Standard Codification 325-942,325‑942, Investments - Other,which requires the investment be carried at cost and be evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value.



The Company evaluated its holdings in FHLB and FRB stock at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and believes its holdings in the stock are ultimately recoverable at par.
Acquisition Activities
The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are measured and recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition, including identifiable intangible assets. If the consideration paid exceeds the fair value

Discontinued Operations

Portions of the net assets acquired, goodwill is recognized at the acquisition date. Fair values are subject to refinement over the measurement period, not to exceed one year after the closing dateCompany that were disposed of an acquisitionby sale, and that represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on operations and financial results, were accounted for as discontinued operations. Additional information relative to closing date fair values becomes available.

The determination of the fair value of loans acquired takes into account credit quality deteriorationon discontinued operations can be found in Note 3 - Divestitures and probability of loss; therefore, the related allowance for loan losses is not carried forward.
All identifiable intangible assets that are acquired in a business combination are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date. Identifiable intangible assets are recognized separately if they arise from contractual or other legal rights or if they are separable (i.e., capable of being sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged separately from the entity).
Discontinued Operations.

Loans

Loans Held for Investment

Loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal, net of the allowance for loan losses, deferred income (net of deferred costs) and other unearned income. Interest income on loans is recognized using the effective yield method on the daily balances of the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees, net of direct loan origination costs, commitment fees, premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized as an adjustment to yield over the life of the loan, or over the commitment period, as applicable.

Loans are considered to be past due when payment is not received from the borrower by the contractually specified due date. Interest accruals on loans are discontinued when interest or principal has been in default 90 days or more, unless the loan is secured by collateral that is sufficient to repay the debt in full and the loan is in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, interest accrued and not paid in the current accounting period is reversed against current period income. Interest accrued and not paid in prior periods, if significant, is reversed against the allowance for loan losses.

Income on such loans is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the future collection of principal is deemed probable or after all principal payments are received. Commercial loans are placed back on accrual status after sustained performance of timely and current principal and interest payments and it is probable that all remaining amounts due, both principal and interest, are fully collectible according to the terms of the loan agreement. Residential loans and consumer loans are generally placed back on accrual status when they are no longer past due.

A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. A specific allowance is established for individually evaluated impaired loans as needed. Reserves on impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the observable market price, or the fair value of the underlying collateral of the loan if the loan is collateral dependent.

The Company evaluates loans in accordance with the provisions within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 310‑40, Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) are loans in which the Company has modified the terms and granted an economic concession to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties. These modifications may include interest rate reductions, term extensions and other concessions intended to minimize losses. Typically, loans accruing interest at the time of the modification remain on accrual status and are subject to the Company’s charge-off and nonaccrual policies. Loans on nonaccrual prior to modification remain on nonaccrual. TDRs may be returned to accrual status as outlined above. Interest income recognition on impaired loans is dependent upon nonaccrual status and loan type as discussed above.

73

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company acquired loans through a business combination. Certain loans showed evidence of credit deterioration (see discussion below). A majority of the acquired loans did not show signs of credit deterioration and were accounted for under ASC 310-20.310‑20. As such, the difference between the fair value and the unpaid principal balance of loans at acquisition is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.



In the third quarter of 2012, the Bank entered into a sub-participation agreement with a commercial bank (the participating bank), whereby pursuant to the sub-participation agreement, the Bank purchases participation interests in single-family mortgage loans from the participating bank that has purchased ownership interests from unaffiliated mortgage originators that seek funding to facilitate the origination of single-family residential mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market. The originators underwrite and close mortgage loans consistent with established standards of approved investors and, once the sales close, the originators and the participating bank deliver the loans to the investors. Typically, the participating bank purchases up to an aggregate of a 99% ownership interest with the originators retaining the remaining 1% interest. The Bank typically purchases a 40% or less interest in the mortgage warehouse loans from the participating bank. These loans are held for short periods, usually less than 30 days. These mortgage warehouse loans are classified as held for investment as of December 31, 2017,2019, and 2016.

2018.

Loans Held for Sale

The Company maintainshad loans held-for-sale related to branch divestitures and also, at times, will have loans held for sale in connection with two distinct departments: the mortgage department and the TriNet division. The Company’s mortgage department primarily originates long-term loans held-for-sale and uses various correspondent relationships to sell the loans on the secondary market.SBA department. Loans held-for-sale are carried at lower of cost or market on an individual loan basis. Held-for-investment loans that have been transferred to held-for-sale are carried at lower of cost or fair value. Fair value is determined from observable current market prices. The credit component of any charge-off upon transfer to held-for-sale is reflected in the allowance for loan losses. The mortgage department also originates certain mortgage loans to be retained, which are classified as loans held-for-investment. From time to time, certain of these loans may be transferred to loans held for sale, marketed and sold in order to manage the Company’s interest rate risk position and concentration limits.

Prior to the division closing in 2016, the Company’s TriNet division originated construction loans for pre-leased “build to suit” projects and provided interim and long-term financing to professional developers and private investors of commercial real estate with or subject to long-term leases to tenants that are investment grade or have investment grade attributes. The Company classifies all TriNet originations as held-for-investment. From time to time, the Company may evaluate a portion of the originated loans to sell in order to manage the Company’s overall interest rate risk and asset-liability sensitivity. The Company transfers the loans to held-for-sale once specific loans are identified and the decision to sell the loan has been made. The loans are carried at lower of cost or market.

Purchased Loans With Evidence of Credit Deterioration

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Atlantic Capital purchased loans through a business combination transaction. Some of those purchased loans showed evidence of credit deterioration since origination and are accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30,310‑30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. These purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans are recorded at their estimated fair value at date of purchase.

PCI loans are aggregated into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics such as the type of loan, payment status, or collateral type. Atlantic Capital estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows for each purchased loan pool and the expected cash flows in excess of the fair value of the loans are recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the pool (accretable yield). The excess of the pool’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (nonaccretable difference).

At least quarterly and over the life of the loan pool, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. Increases in estimated cash flows are recognized on a prospective basis as interest income over the remaining life of the loan. Decreases in expected cash flows result in the recognition of a provision for loan loss.

As of December 31, 2018, PCI loans were reclassified to held for sale and subsequently sold in the Branch Sale.

74

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through the provision for loan losses charged against earnings and is maintained at a level that management considers adequate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio. The allowance for loan losses framework has two basic elements: specific allowances for loans individually evaluated for impairment and a general allowance for pools of loans with similar characteristics not individually evaluated. This analysis includes the evaluation of impaired loans as prescribed under the Receivables Topic of the FASB ASC, as well as pooled loans as prescribed under the Contingencies Topic of the FASB ASC. Management’s evaluation of the allowance considers changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, historic charge-offs, adequacy of collateral, delinquency trends, loan concentrations, economic conditions, changes in policies and procedures, changes in lending management, changes in loan review system and other factors considered necessary to maintain the allowance at an adequate level. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collection of the principal is unlikely and the loss is quantifiable. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance in the period received.



The allowance for loans losses for acquired performing loans is evaluated at each reporting date subsequent to acquisition and the allowance is determined using a methodology similar to that described above.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is appropriate and adequate. While management uses available information to estimate the inherent losses at each balance sheet date, future changes to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for losses on loans.

Premises and Equipment, Net

Land is carried at cost. Other premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. In general, estimated lives for buildings and improvements are up to 40 years, furniture and equipment useful lives range from one to ten years, and the lives of leasehold improvements range from ten to eleven years. Expenditures for major improvements of the Company’s premises and equipment are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Major additions and improvements are charged to the asset accounts while maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the assets are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is reflected in the results of operations for the period.

The Company determines if a lease is present at the inception of an agreement. Operating leases are capitalized at commencement and are discounted using the Company’s FHLB borrowing rate for a similar term borrowing unless the lease defines an implicit rate within the contract. Leases with original terms of less than 12 months are not capitalized.

Right-of-use assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized on the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. No significant judgments or assumptions were involved in developing the estimated operating lease liabilities as the Company’s operating lease liabilities largely represent future rental expenses associated with operating leases and the borrowing rates are based on publicly available interest rates.

The lease term includes options to extend or terminate the lease. These options to extend or terminate are assessed on a lease-by-lease basis and adjustments are made to the right-of-use asset and lease liability if the Company is reasonably certain that an option will be exercised and will be expensed on a straight-line basis. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases are included within premises and equipment, net and other liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 7 – Premises and Equipment for additional information on leases.

75

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is an asset representing the future economic benefits from other assets acquired that are not individually identified and separately recognized. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the consideration transferred, net of the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances exist that indicate a goodwill impairment test should be performed.

Other intangible assets, which are initially recorded at fair value, consist of core deposit intangible assets resulting from Atlantic Capital’s acquisition of First Security. Core deposit intangible assets are amortized on a sum-of-all-months basis over their estimated useful lives. The Company evaluates its other intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.

Other Real Estate Owned

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of the loan balance or fair value at the date of foreclosure, less estimated costs to sell. Any difference between the initial cost basis and the carrying value of the loan is charged to the allowance for loan losses at the date of the transfer to other real estate owned. Subsequent to foreclosure, any further declines in value of the assets are recorded as adjustments to the asset’s carrying amount and reported in noninterest expense, along with costs related to holding the properties, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Servicing Rights

The Company sells certain loans to third parties. All such transfers are accounted for as sales by the Company. Gains or losses upon sale are recorded in noninterest income. The Company records a separate servicing asset for the loans when the servicing is retained and the expected servicing income is more than adequate compensation for providing the servicing. This asset represents the right or obligation to service the loans and receive a fee in compensation. Servicing assets are initially recorded at their fair value as a component of the sale proceeds. The fair value of the servicing assets is based on an analysis of discounted cash flows that incorporates estimates of (1) market servicing costs, (2) market-based prepayment rates, and (3) market profit margins.

The Company has elected to subsequently measure the servicing assets under the amortization method and measured for impairment on a quarterly basis. The rate of prepayment of loans serviced is the most significant estimate involved in the measurement process. Estimates of prepayment rates are based on market participant’s expectations of future prepayment rates, reflecting the Company’s historical rate of loan repayments if consistent with market participant assumptions, industry trends, and other considerations. Actual prepayment rates may differ from those projected by management due to changes in a variety of economic factors, including prevailing interest rates and the availability of alternative financing sources to borrowers. If actual prepayments of the loans being serviced were to occur more quickly than projected, an impairment could exist, and the carrying value of servicing assets may require a write-down through a charge to earnings in the current period. Accordingly, the servicing assets actually realized, could differ from the amounts initially recorded.



Bank Owned Life Insurance

The Bank has purchased life insurance policies on certain key personnel. Bank owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

Segment Reporting

Atlantic Capital considers its operations to be a single business segment as defined in ASC 280, Segment Reporting.The Company has determined that its lending divisions meet the aggregation criteria of ASC 280 as the products and services, nature of the production processes, types of customers, methods used to distribute products and services and the regulatory environment are sufficiently similar to aggregate their results.

76

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is based on income and expense reported for financial statement purposes after adjustments for permanent differences. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carryforwards, are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the assets and liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date.

A valuation allowance is provided when it is deemed more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the ability to realize the deferred tax assets, management considers the four possible sources of taxable income including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies that would be implemented to utilize the loss carryforwards prior to expiration.

A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination.

Atlantic Capital files its income tax returns on a consolidated basis. For additional information, see, Note 14 - Income Taxes.

Stock-Based Compensation

Atlantic Capital sponsors a stock-based compensation plan, which is described more fully in Note 15 - Employee and Director Benefit Plans. Compensation cost is recognized for stock options warrants and restricted stock awards issued to employees and directors, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options, and warrants, while the price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards. Compensation expense for performance share awards are based on the fair value of Atlantic Capital’s stock at the grant date adjusted for market conditions, as well as the subsequent achievement of performance conditions. The total cost of the Company’s stock-based awards is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods of the awards.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period, plus common share equivalents calculated for stock options and warrants outstanding using the treasury stock method. When a net loss is recognized for the period, diluted earnings per share is calculated in the same manner as basic earnings per share.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they are funded.



Fair Value

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Examples of these include available-for-sale securities and derivative instruments. Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis when assets are evaluated for impairment; the basis for accounting is lower of cost or market or fair value for disclosure purposes. Fair value is defined as the price

77

that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. For additional information, see Note 18 - Fair Value Measurements.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company follows the guidance under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and records all derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. For derivatives designated as qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, the change in fair value of the effective portion is accounted for in other comprehensive income. For all other derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging relationships, changes in market value are recognized directly into earnings. For additional information, see Note 16 - Derivatives and Hedging.

Branch Assets Held for Sale and Liabilities to be Assumed

On December 9, 2016,April 5, 2019, Atlantic Capital announcedcompleted the sale of one branchall 14 of its bank branches located in Cleveland, Tennessee and northwest Georgia, including its mortgage banking business, to SmartFinancial, Inc., the bank holding company for SmartBank. On December 17, 2015, the Bank entered into two agreements to sell seven branches to First Freedom Bank and Athens Federal Community Bank, N.A.FirstBank (the “Branch Sale”). These branches were acquired from First Security and consistconsisted of loans, premises and deposits that arewere considered to be held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.2018. They arewere carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The sale of the First Freedom and Athens Federal branches closed in the second quarter of 2016. The sale of the Cleveland, Tennessee branch closed in the second quarter of 2017.

Going Concern Assessment

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15,2014‑15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40205‑40 - Disclosure of Uncertainties about and Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.”  This guidance requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued or available to be issued. No conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about Atlantic Capital’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the 20172019 financial statements are issued or available to be issued.

78

NOTE 2 – ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATES AND RECENTLY ADOPTED STANDARDS

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2018,2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-02,2016‑02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The guidance gives entities the option to reclassify into retained earnings tax effects related to items in accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) that were stranded in accumulated OCI as a result of tax reform. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption in any period is permitted and Atlantic Capital adopted ASU 2018-02 as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this update will result in a reclassification of approximately $845,000 between accumulated OCI and retained earnings, and a net impact of zero to total shareholders’ equity.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.Leases. The purpose of this updatedUnder the new guidance, is to better align a company’s financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. ASU 2017-12 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, permitted. Atlantic Capital adopted ASU 2017-12leases classified as of January 1, 2018. The guidance requires a modified retrospective transition method resulting in the cumulative effect of the changeoperating leases under previous GAAP must be recorded on the opening balance of each affected component of equitysheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position as ofa liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset representing its right to use the date of adoption. Adoption did not have a material impact on Atlantic Capital’s consolidated financial statements.
underlying asset for the lease term. In May 2017,July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,No. 2018‑10, CompensationCodification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases and ASU No. 2018‑11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements.”  ASU No. 2018‑10 provides improvements related to ASU No. 2016‑02 to increase stakeholders’ awareness of the amendments and to expedite the improvements. The amendments affect narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU No. 2016‑02. ASU No. 2018‑11 allows entities adopting ASU No. 2016‑02 to choose an additional (and optional) transition method, under which an entity initially applies the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. By electing the transition option provided in ASU No. 2018-11, the Company applied the modified retrospective approach on January 1, 2019 (as opposed to January 1, 2017). The Company also elected certain relief options offered in ASU 2016-02 including the package of practical expedients, the option not to separate lease and non-lease components and instead to account for them as a single lease component, and the option not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that arise from short-term leases (i.e., leases with terms of twelve months or less). The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient, which allows entities to use hindsight when determining lease term and impairment of right-of-use assets. The amendments in these updates became effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. The impact of adoption was recording a lease liability of approximately $18.9 million in other liabilities, an ROU asset of approximately $14.5 million in premises and equipment, and a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, net of tax, of approximately $373,000 on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-05, “Financial Instruments - Stock CompensationCredit Losses (Topic 718)326); Targeted Transition Relief.” This ASU allows entities to irrevocably elect, upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, the fair value option on financial instruments that (1) were previously recorded at amortized cost and (2) are within the scope of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326-20 if the instruments are eligible for the fair value option under ASC 825-10. The fair value option election does not apply to held-to-maturity debt securities. Entities are required to make this election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. ASU 2019-05 has the same effective date as ASU 2016-13 (i.e., the first quarter of 2020). The Company does not expect to elect the fair value option, and therefore, ASU 2019-05 is not expected to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018‑13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Scope and Modification Accounting.Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.The amendments in this ASU provide guidance about which changes toupdate modify the termsdisclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying, or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in accordance with Topic 718.adding certain disclosures. The amendments will beupdate is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This ASU is31, 2019, with early adoption permitted for the removed disclosures and delayed adoption until fiscal year 2020 permitted for new disclosures. The removed and modified disclosures will be adopted on a retrospective basis and the new disclosures will be adopted on a prospective basis. The adoption will not expected to have a material impacteffect on Atlantic Capital’sthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08,2017‑08, “Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20)310‑20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.” This guidance shortens the premium amortization period for certain callable debt securities by requiring amortization to the earliest call date. The standard is effective for public companies for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on Atlantic Capital’s consolidated financial statements.

79

In January 2017, the FASB issued  ASU 2017-04,2017‑04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,”  which intends to simplify goodwill impairment testing by eliminating the second step of the analysis under which the implied fair value of goodwill is determined as if the reporting unit were being acquired in a business combination. The update instead requires entities to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for any amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, to the extent that the loss recognized does not exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-042017‑04 must be applied prospectively and iswas effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. Atlantic Capital does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” to address diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments provide guidance on the following eight specific cash flow issues: 1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; 2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; 3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; 4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; 5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; 6) distributions received from equity method investees; 7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and 8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. The amendments are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. As this guidance only affects the classification within the statement of cash flows, this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,2016‑13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU 2016-132016‑13 requires an entity to utilize a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss” and record an allowance that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The CECL model is expected to result in more timely recognition of credit losses. ASU 2016-132016‑13 also requires new disclosures for financial assets measured at amortized cost, loans and available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-13 is2016‑13 was effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. Atlantic CapitalThe Company implemented a software package that is in the processbeing utilized to estimate credit losses under CECL and performed model validation procedures.  The Company is currently finalizing its implementation of evaluating the impact ofinternal controls and processes and will finalize the adoption of ASU 2016-13 onduring the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” The amendments in ASU 2016-09 simplify several aspects of accounting for employee share-based payments including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance required all income tax effects of awards to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled and additional paid in capital pools were eliminated. The guidance requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Companies are required to account for forfeitures of share-based payments by recognizing forfeitures of awards as they occur or estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, through an accounting policy election. The guidance increases the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s income tax withholding obligation. The guidance requires an employer to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. For public entities, the amendments in this update were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on Atlantic Capital’s financial position or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2, “Leases.” Under the new guidance, leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP must be recorded on the balance sheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after


December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, and provides for certain practical expedients. Upon adoption, Atlantic Capital expects to report higher assets and liabilities as a result of including leases on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on the consolidated statement of income or the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-1, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities.” The guidance in this update requires that equity investments (except those accounting for under the equity method of accounting) be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. The guidance also simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. In addition, the guidance requires that public business entities base their fair value disclosures for financial instruments that are not measured at fair value in the financial statements on the exit price notion. For public entities, this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 with early application permitted. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on Atlantic Capital’s consolidated financial statements, however Atlantic Capital will change the disclosure of financial instruments not measured at fair value to reflect the exit price notion.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This update is a joint project with the International Accounting Standards Board initiated to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard that is meant to remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements, provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, improve comparability of revenue recognition practices, provide more useful information to users of financial statements and simplify the preparation of financial statements. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For public companies, this guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Atlantic Capital has completed its review of the impact of ASU 2014-09 on components of non-interest income and has not found any significant changes to its methodology of recognizing revenue. Revenue streams impacted by the ASU included service charges, trust income, sales of financed other real estate, and check printing revenue. The Company anticipates recording a cumulative effect adjustment to first quarter 2018 opening retained earnings in an amount less than $2,000, and the Company will include newly applicable revenue disclosures in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.of 2020.



NOTE 3 – ACQUISITIONSDIVESTITURES AND DIVESTITURES

Acquisition of First Security Group
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Discontinued Operations

On October 31, 2015, Atlantic CapitalApril 5, 2019, the Bank completed the acquisitionBranch Sale. FirstBank assumed deposits and customer repurchase agreements of First Security and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary, FSGBank. First Security operated twenty-five branches in Georgia and Tennessee. In connection with the acquisition, Atlantic Capital acquired approximately $801 million of loans and assumed approximately $970 million of deposits.

Acquisition-related costs totaled $304,000, $2.7$598 million and $9.2purchased approximately $385 million in loans. FirstBank paid a deposit premium equal to 6.25% of the balance of assumed deposits less a discount of 0.68% of purchased loans.

The income and expenses related to these branches for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015, respectively, and wereare included in noninterest expense indiscontinued operations and prior period financial information has been retrospectively adjusted for the consolidated income statement. Acquisition related costs primarily include severance costs, professional services, data processing fees related to systems conversion and other noninterest expenses.

Divestitureimpact of Branches
On December 17, 2015, the Bank entered into two separate definitive agreements to sell seven branches in the Bank’s Tennessee market. The agreement with First Freedom Bank includes the sale of three branches located in Algood, Cookeville and Gainesboro, Tennessee for a premium of 2.25% of deposits. The agreement with Athens Federal includes the sale of four branches in Athens, Lenoir City, Madisonville and Sweetwater, Tennessee for a premium of 3.50% of deposits. Both transactions closed in the second quarter of 2016 and resulted in a combined gain of $3.9 million as well as a reduction of approximately $191.0 million in deposits, approximately $34.7 million in loans and approximately $8.6 million in other assets. The gain was somewhat reduced by an impairment of $2.0 million in core deposit intangibles, which was offset by a $344,000 reversal in time deposit premium. There were also $305,000 of expenses associated with the divestitures included in noninterest expense in the second quarter of 2016.
On December 9, 2016, Atlantic Capital entered into a definitive agreement to sell one branch in Cleveland, Tennessee, to SmartBank. The sale closed in the second quarter of 2017, and resulted in a net gain of $302,000 as well as a reduction of approximately $21.9 million in deposits and approximately $27.3 million in loans and other assets. The gross gain of $533,000 was reduced by an impairment of $337,000 in core deposit intangibles, which was offset by a $106,000 reversal in time deposit premium. There were also $38,000 of expenses associated with the divestiture included in noninterest expense in the second quarter of 2017.
discontinued operations.

Sale of Southeastern Trust Company (“SETCO”)

On December 14, 2017, the Bank entered into an agreement with theThe Banc Group, LLC to sell its trust business, a division of the Bank known as Southeastern Trust Company, for approximately $1.8 million. The Banc Group, LLC, which subsequently changed its name to Southeastern Trust Company, LLC, is controlled by a former director and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of all regulatory approvals, theThe sale of SETCO is expected to closeclosed on June 1, 2018 and Atlantic Capital recorded a gain of $1.7 million during the second quarter, which was net of 2018.goodwill impairment in the amount of $69,000.


80



The following table presents results of the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:

Components of Net Income from Discontinued Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 

(in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Net interest income

 

$

3,086

 

$

14,140

 

$

18,310

Provision for loan losses

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,097)

 

 

 —

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

 

3,086

 

 

17,237

 

 

18,310

Service charges

 

 

527

 

 

1,922

 

 

2,342

Mortgage income

 

 

288

 

 

1,302

 

 

1,255

Gain on sale of branches

 

 

34,475

 

 

 —

 

 

302

Other (loss) income

 

 

(1)

 

 

123

 

 

111

Total noninterest income

 

 

35,289

 

 

3,347

 

 

4,010

Salaries and employee benefits

 

 

2,757

 

 

11,714

 

 

12,245

Occupancy

 

 

410

 

 

2,016

 

 

2,073

Equipment and software

 

 

131

 

 

779

 

 

1,108

Amortization of intangibles

 

 

247

 

 

1,229

 

 

1,653

Communications and data processing

 

 

586

 

 

1,529

 

 

1,524

Divestiture expense

 

 

5,095

 

 

825

 

 

 —

Other noninterest expense

 

 

459

 

 

1,849

 

 

2,028

Total noninterest expense

 

 

9,685

 

 

19,941

 

 

20,631

Net income before provision for income taxes

 

 

28,690

 

 

643

 

 

1,689

Provision for income taxes

 

 

6,993

 

 

161

 

 

659

Net income from discontinued operations

 

$

21,697

 

$

482

 

$

1,030

Assets sold to and liabilities assumed by FirstBank include substantially all assets and liabilities associated with the branches sold in the Branch Sale, and were classified as held for sale on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018. Prior year balances have been adjusted to conform with current presentation.

The following table summarizes the major categories of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale and intangibles related to discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018:

Assets and Liabilities from Discontinued Operations

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

    

December 31, 2018

Cash

 

$

4,234

Loans held for sale - discontinued operations

 

 

373,030

Premises held for sale - discontinued operations

 

 

7,722

Goodwill - discontinued operations

 

 

4,555

Core deposit intangible

 

 

1,405

Total assets

 

$

390,946

 

 

 

 

Deposits to be assumed - discontinued operations

 

$

585,429

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - discontinued operations

 

 

6,220

Total liabilities

 

$

591,649

Net liabilities

 

$

(200,703)

81

NOTE 4 – BALANCE SHEET OFFSETTING

Atlantic Capital enters into reverse repurchase agreements in order to invest short-term funds. The Company enters into repurchase agreements for short-term financing needs.

The following table presents a summary of amounts outstanding under repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and derivative financial instruments including those entered into in connection with the same counterparty under master netting agreements as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018. While these agreements are typically over-collateralized, U.S. GAAP requires disclosures in this table to limit the amount of such collateral to the amount of the related recognized asset or liability for each counterparty.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amounts not Offset in the

 

 

 

 

    

Gross 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Balance Sheet

    

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Gross Amounts

 

Net

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Recognized

 

Offset on the

 

Asset

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Assets

 

Balance Sheet

 

Balance

 

Instruments

 

Received

 

Net Amount

Derivatives

 

$

8,856

 

$

 —

 

$

8,856

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

8,856

Total

 

$

8,856

 

$

 —

 

$

8,856

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

8,856

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amounts not Offset in the

 

 

 

 

    

Gross

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Balance Sheet

    

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Gross Amounts

 

Net

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Offset on the

 

Liability

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

Balance Sheet

 

Balance

 

Instruments

 

Pledged

 

Net Amount

Derivatives

 

$

5,647

 

$

 —

 

$

5,647

 

$

(5,647)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Total

 

$

5,647

 

$

 —

 

$

5,647

 

$

(5,647)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amounts not Offset in the

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Gross Amounts

 

Net

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Offset on the

 

Asset

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

    

Assets

    

Balance Sheet

    

Balance

    

Instruments

    

Received

    

Net Amount

Reverse repurchase agreements

 

$

9,457

 

$

 —

 

$

9,457

 

$

(9,457)

 

$

 —

 

$

Derivatives

 

 

1,961

 

 

 —

 

 

1,961

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,961

Total

 

$

11,418

 

$

 —

 

$

11,418

 

$

(9,457)

 

$

 —

 

$

1,961

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amounts not Offset in the

 

 

 

 

    

Gross

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Balance Sheet

    

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Gross Amounts

 

Net

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Offset on the

 

Liability

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

Balance Sheet

 

Balance

 

Instruments

 

Pledged

 

Net Amount

Repurchase agreements - discontinued operations

 

$

6,220

 

$

 —

 

$

6,220

 

$

(6,220)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Derivatives

 

 

4,027

 

 

 —

 

 

4,027

 

 

(4,027)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

10,247

 

$

 —

 

$

10,247

 

$

(10,247)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

82

(in thousands)        Gross Amounts not Offset in the Balance Sheet  
December 31, 2017 Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets Gross Amounts Offset on the Balance Sheet Net Asset Balance Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
Reverse repurchase agreements $10,681
 $
 $10,681
 $(10,681) $
 $
Derivatives 3,018
 
 3,018
 
 
 3,018
Total $13,699
 $
 $13,699
 $(10,681) $
 $3,018
         Gross Amounts not Offset in the Balance Sheet  
  Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amounts Offset on the Balance Sheet Net Liability Balance Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Pledged Net Amount
Repurchase agreements $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Derivatives 4,023
 
 4,023
 (2,705) (1,318) 
Total $4,023
 $
 $4,023
 $(2,705) $(1,318) $
             
             
         Gross Amounts not Offset in the Balance Sheet  
December 31, 2016 Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets Gross Amounts Offset on the Balance Sheet Net Asset Balance Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
Reverse repurchase agreements $10,896
 $
 $10,896
 $(10,896) $
 $
Derivatives 4,310
 
 4,310
 
 
 4,310
Total $15,206
 $
 $15,206
 $(10,896) $
 $4,310
         Gross Amounts not Offset in the Balance Sheet  
  Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amounts Offset on the Balance Sheet Net Liability Balance Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Pledged Net Amount
Repurchase agreements $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Derivatives 4,131
 
 4,131
 (1,818) (2,313) 
Total $4,131
 $
 $4,131
 $(1,818) $(2,313) $



NOTE 5 – SECURITIES

The following table presents the amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

 

    

Cost

    

Gains

    

Losses

    

Fair Value

 

 

(in thousands)

December 31, 2019

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Available-For-Sale

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

U.S. states and political divisions

 

$

81,865

 

$

863

 

$

(243)

 

$

82,485

Trust preferred securities

 

 

4,808

 

 

 —

 

 

(120)

 

 

4,688

Corporate debt securities

 

 

19,557

 

 

363

 

 

 —

 

 

19,920

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

173,047

 

 

2,797

 

 

(476)

 

 

175,368

Total available-for-sale

 

 

279,277

 

 

4,023

 

 

(839)

 

 

282,461

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Held-to-Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. states and political divisions

 

 

116,972

 

 

104

 

 

(1,785)

 

 

115,291

Total held-to-maturity

 

 

116,972

 

 

104

 

 

(1,785)

 

 

115,291

Total securities

 

$

396,249

 

$

4,127

 

$

(2,624)

 

$

397,752

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Available-For-Sale

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

27,259

 

$

24

 

$

(434)

 

$

26,849

U.S. states and political divisions

 

 

91,864

 

 

40

 

 

(7,070)

 

 

84,834

Trust preferred securities

 

 

4,781

 

 

 

 

(381)

 

 

4,400

Corporate debt securities

 

 

12,855

 

 

 

 

(492)

 

 

12,363

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

277,524

 

 

2,726

 

 

(6,210)

 

 

274,040

Total securities

 

$

414,283

 

$

2,790

 

$

(14,587)

 

$

402,486

 Available-For-Sale 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
  (in thousands)
December 31, 2017        
Debt securities        
U.S. Government agencies $34,699
 $11
 $(599) $34,111
U.S. states and political divisions 92,169
 237
 (2,405) 90,001
Trust preferred securities 4,754
 
 (104) 4,650
Corporate debt securities 12,948
 60
 (386) 12,622
Residential mortgage-backed securities 310,129
 2,423
 (4,819) 307,733
Total $454,699
 $2,731
 $(8,313) $449,117
         
December 31, 2016        
Debt securities        
U.S. Government agencies $21,485
 $24
 $(357) $21,152
U.S. states and political divisions 96,908
 141
 (6,877) 90,172
Trust preferred securities 4,727
 
 (202) 4,525
Corporate debt securities 19,928
 72
 (769) 19,231
Residential mortgage-backed securities 214,297
 2,689
 (4,361) 212,625
Total $357,345
 $2,926
 $(12,566) $347,705

The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2017.2019. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-For-Sale

 

Held-to-Maturity

 

    

Amortized

    

Fair

    

Amortized

    

Fair

 

 

Cost

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Value

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

Within 1 year

 

$

6,044

 

$

6,136

 

$

 

$

Over 1 year through 5 years

 

 

4,027

 

 

4,078

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

5 years to 10 years

 

 

34,804

 

 

35,152

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Over 10 years

 

 

61,355

 

 

61,727

 

 

116,972

 

 

115,291

 

 

 

106,230

 

 

107,093

 

 

116,972

 

 

115,291

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

173,047

 

 

175,368

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

279,277

 

$

282,461

 

$

116,972

 

$

115,291

83

 Available-For-Sale
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 (in thousands)
Within 1 year$65
 $65
Over 1 year through 5 years22,164
 22,002
5 years to 10 years47,720
 46,752
Over 10 years74,621
 72,565
 144,570
 141,384
Residential mortgage-backed securities310,129
 307,733
Total$454,699
 $449,117









The following table summarizes available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 20172019 and  December 31, 2016.2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

12 months or greater

 

Totals

 

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

December 31, 2019

    

Value

    

Losses

    

Value

    

Losses

    

Value

    

Losses

 

 

(in thousands)

Available-for-Sale

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

U.S. states and political divisions

 

$

20,019

 

$

(190)

 

$

4,090

 

$

(53)

 

$

24,109

 

$

(243)

Trust preferred securities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,687

 

 

(120)

 

 

4,687

 

 

(120)

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

10,751

 

 

(78)

 

 

30,292

 

 

(398)

 

 

41,043

 

 

(476)

Total available-for-sale

 

 

30,770

 

 

(268)

 

 

39,069

 

 

(571)

 

 

69,839

 

 

(839)

Held-to-Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. states and political divisions

 

 

96,854

 

 

(1,785)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

96,854

 

 

(1,785)

Total held-to-maturity

 

 

96,854

 

 

(1,785)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

96,854

 

 

(1,785)

Total securities

 

$

127,624

 

$

(2,053)

 

$

39,069

 

$

(571)

 

$

166,693

 

$

(2,624)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agencies

 

$

1,487

 

$

(19)

 

$

21,849

 

$

(415)

 

$

23,336

 

$

(434)

U.S. states and political divisions

 

 

2,351

 

 

(54)

 

 

75,234

 

 

(7,016)

 

 

77,585

 

 

(7,070)

Trust preferred securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,400

 

 

(381)

 

 

4,400

 

 

(381)

Corporate debt securities

 

 

6,009

 

 

(60)

 

 

6,354

 

 

(432)

 

 

12,363

 

 

(492)

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

30,938

 

 

(152)

 

 

196,745

 

 

(6,058)

 

 

227,683

 

 

(6,210)

Total securities

 

$

40,785

 

$

(285)

 

$

304,582

 

$

(14,302)

 

$

345,367

 

$

(14,587)

  Less than 12 months 12 months or greater Totals
Available-For-Sale 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
  (in thousands)
December 31, 2017            
U.S. Government agencies $22,148
 $(348) $9,145
 $(251) $31,293
 $(599)
U.S. states and political divisions 14,009
 (183) 58,744
 (2,222) 72,753
 (2,405)
Trust preferred securities 
 
 4,650
 (104) 4,650
 (104)
Corporate debt securities 2,989
 (27) 2,970
 (359) 5,959
 (386)
Residential mortgage-backed securities 155,637
 (1,344) 126,580
 (3,475) 282,217
 (4,819)
Totals $194,783
 $(1,902) $202,089
 $(6,411) $396,872
 $(8,313)
December 31, 2016            
U.S. Government agencies $12,250
 $(263) $2,881
 $(94) $15,131
 $(357)
U.S. states and political divisions 87,511
 (6,877) 
 
 87,511
 (6,877)
Trust preferred securities 
 
 4,525
 (202) 4,525
 (202)
Corporate debt securities 7,886
 (769) 
 
 7,886
 (769)
Residential mortgage-backed securities 151,406
 (3,231) 32,550
 (1,130) 183,956
 (4,361)
Totals $259,053

$(11,140) $39,956
 $(1,426) $299,009
 $(12,566)

At December 31, 2017,2019, there were 26977 available-for-sale securities and 35 held-to-maturity securities that were in an unrealized loss position. At December 31, 2018, there were 271 securities in an unrealized loss position, and all were classified as available-for-sale. Atlantic Capital does not intend to sell nor believes it will be required to sell securities in an unrealized loss position prior to the recovery of their amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 were attributable to changes in market interest rates.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, among other factors. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and industry analysts’ reports. No impairment charges were recognized during the year ended December 31, 20172019 or 2016.

2018.

Realized gains and losses are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold. The following table summarizes securities sales activity for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

 

    

2019

    

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Proceeds from sales

 

$

116,963

 

$

62,087

Gross realized gains

 

$

1,675

 

$

 —

Gross realized losses

 

 

(768)

 

 

(1,855)

Net gains (losses) on sales of securities

 

$

907

 

$

(1,855)

   Twelve Months Ended December 31,
   2017 2016
   (in thousands)
Proceeds from sales  $19,238
 $65,103
      
Gross realized gains  $313
 $449
Gross realized losses  (376) (405)
Net gains on sales of securities  $(63) $44

Investment securities with a carrying value of $93.9$32.3 million and $104.9$65.3 million were pledged to secure public funds and other borrowings at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively.



84

As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, Atlantic Capital had investments with a carrying value of $4.7 million and $4.4 million, respectively, in Small Business Investment Companies (“SBICs”) where Atlantic Capital is a limited partner. These investments are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded impairments in the amounts of $26,000 and $228,000, respectively, on these SBICs. The impairment resulted from deterioration in the credit quality of one of the SBICs and their inability to pay distributions until their financial position improves. There have been no upward adjustments, cumulatively or year-to-date, on these investments.

NOTE 6 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The composition of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, is summarized below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Loans held for sale

 

 

  

 

 

  

Loans held for sale - discontinued operations

 

$

 —

 

$

373,030

Loans held for sale - continuing operations

 

 

370

 

 

5,889

Total loans held for sale

 

$

370

 

$

378,919

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans held for investment

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial loans:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial and industrial

 

$

705,115

 

$

645,374

Commercial real estate

 

 

916,328

 

 

794,828

Construction and land

 

 

127,540

 

 

156,232

Mortgage warehouse participations

 

 

13,941

 

 

27,967

Total commercial loans

 

 

1,762,924

 

 

1,624,401

Residential:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgages

 

 

31,315

 

 

32,800

Home equity

 

 

25,002

 

 

22,822

Total residential loans

 

 

56,317

 

 

55,622

Consumer

 

 

37,765

 

 

25,851

Other

 

 

19,552

 

 

24,712

Total loans

 

 

1,876,558

 

 

1,730,586

Less net deferred fees and other unearned income

 

 

(3,034)

 

 

(2,513)

Less allowance for loan losses

 

 

(18,535)

 

 

(17,851)

Loans held for investment, net

 

$

1,854,989

 

$

1,710,222

 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 (in thousands)
Loans held for sale   
Branch loans held for sale$
 $30,917
Other loans held for sale1,487
 4,302
Total loans held for sale$1,487
 $35,219
    
Loans held for investment   
Commercial loans:   
Commercial and industrial$615,359
 $531,061
Commercial real estate940,415
 858,778
Construction and land115,495
 219,352
Mortgage warehouse participations39,981
 147,519
Total commercial loans1,711,250
 1,756,710
Residential:   
Residential mortgages104,484
 101,921
Home equity76,244
 77,358
Total residential loans180,728
 179,279
Consumer29,393
 27,338
Other16,278
 21,565
Total loans1,937,649
 1,984,892
Less net deferred fees and other unearned income(3,810) (3,562)
Less allowance for loan losses(19,344) (20,595)
Loans held for investment, net$1,914,495
 $1,960,735

At December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, loans with a carrying value of $490.1$729.6 million and $474.8$752.7 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure FHLB advances and the Federal Reserve discount window.

At December 31, 2017, the carrying value and outstanding balance of2018, PCI loans accountedwere designated as held for under ASC 310-30 was $11.8 million and $14.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2016,sale for the carrying value and outstanding balanceBranch Sale that occurred in the second quarter of PCI loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 was $15.3 million and $18.7 million, respectively.2019. The following table presents changes in the value of the accretable yield for acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.310‑30.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

    

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

2,316

Accretion

 

 

(970)

Reclassification of nonaccretable discount due to change in expected cash flows

 

 

444

Other changes, net

 

 

(1,790)

Balance at end of period

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85

  Year Ended Year Ended
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  (in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period $3,467
 $2,369
Accretion (1,503) (1,410)
Reclassification of nonaccretable discount due to change in expected cash flows 82
 2,412
Other changes, net 270
 96
Balance at end of period $2,316
 $3,467

In addition to the accretable yield on PCI loans, the fair value adjustments on purchased loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30310‑30 are also accreted to interest income over the life of the loans. At December 31, 2017,2019, the remaining accretableunamortized balance of fair value discount on loans acquired through a business combination and not accounted for under ASC 310-30310‑30 was $2.8 million.

$279,000 compared to $3.6 million at December 31, 2018.

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio as of the end of the period. It is comprised of specific reserves for impaired loans and a general allowance for pools of loans with similar characteristics not individually evaluated. The allowance is regularly evaluated for loan losses to maintain an adequate level to absorb probable current inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Factors contributing to the determination of the allowance include the credit worthiness of the



borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral, and general economic conditions. AllMost loan commitments rated substandard or worse are specifically reviewed for loss potential. For loans deemed to be impaired, a specific allocation is assigned based on the losses expected to be realized from those loans.

The following table presents the balance and activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

Year Ended December 31, 

    

Commercial

    

Residential

    

Consumer

    

Total

    

Commercial

    

Residential

    

Consumer

    

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Allowance for loan losses:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Beginning balance

 

$

17,322

 

$

292

 

$

237

 

$

17,851

 

$

18,267

 

$

802

 

$

275

 

$

19,344

Provision for loan losses

 

 

2,910

 

 

(153)

 

 

(45)

 

 

2,712

 

 

1,613

 

 

374

 

 

(41)

 

 

1,946

Provision for loan losses - discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(2,429)

 

 

(653)

 

 

(15)

 

 

(3,097)

Loans charged-off

 

 

(2,069)

 

 

(9)

 

 

(39)

 

 

(2,117)

 

 

(176)

 

 

(235)

 

 

(16)

 

 

(427)

Recoveries

 

 

40

 

 

15

 

 

34

 

 

89

 

 

47

 

 

 4

 

 

34

 

 

85

Total ending allowance balance

 

$

18,203

 

$

145

 

$

187

 

$

18,535

 

$

17,322

 

$

292

 

$

237

 

$

17,851


  2017 2016
Twelve months ended December 31, Commercial Residential Consumer Total Commercial Residential Consumer Total
  (in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:                
Beginning balance $18,717
 $1,418
 $460
 $20,595
 $16,537
 $1,981
 $387
 $18,905
Provision for loan losses 3,553
 (533) 198
 3,218
 4,017
 (536) 335
 3,816
Loans charged-off (4,221) (85) (409) (4,715) (1,873) (34) (407) (2,314)
Recoveries 218
 2
 26
 246
 36
 7
 145
 188
Total ending allowance balance $18,267
 $802
 $275
 $19,344
 $18,717
 $1,418
 $460
 $20,595

The general component of the allowance for loan losses is based on the incurred losses inherent in the portfolio. The loss factors are determined through the generation of probabilities of default (“PDs”) and losses given default (“LGDs”) for groups of similar loans with similar credit grades where Loss Factor = PD x LGD. The PDs and LGDs for the loan portfolio are calculated based on Atlantic Capital’s loss history as well as available market-based data. The loss factor for each pool of loans is adjusted based on Qualitative and Environmental factors to account for conditions in the current environment which management believes are likely to cause a difference between the calculated loss based on historical performance and the incurred loss in the existing portfolio. These factors include: changes in policies and procedures, changes in the economy, changes in nature, volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans, changes in lending management, changes in past dues and credit migration, changes in the loan review system, changes in the value of collateral and concentration risk and changes in external factors, such as competition, legal, regulatory, etc. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates these factors in order to determine an adjustment unique to Atlantic Capital and its market.

Charge-offs are recognized when the amount of the loss is quantifiable and timing is known. Collateral based loan charge-offs are measured based on the difference between the loan’s carrying value, including deferred fees, and the estimated net realizable value of the loan. When assessing property value for the purpose of determining a charge-off, a third-party appraisal or an independently derived internal evaluation is generally employed.

86

A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. Loans for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered TDRs and classified as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. A specific allowance is established for individually evaluated impaired loans as needed. Reserves on impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the observable market price, or the fair value of the underlying collateral of the loan if the loan is collateral dependent.

Nonaccrual loans include both homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually evaluated impaired loans. Atlantic Capital’s policy is to place loans on nonaccrual status, when, in the opinion of management, the principal and interest on a loan is not likely to be repaid in accordance with the loan terms or when the loan becomes 90 days past due and is not well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is classified on nonaccrual status, interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current interest revenue. Principal and interest payments received on a nonaccrual loan are applied to reduce outstanding principal.

PCI Loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement remains unpaid after the due date of the scheduled payment. Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30310‑30 were not classified as nonaccrual, at December 31, 2017 and 2016 as the carrying value of the respective loan or pool of loans cash flows were considered estimable and probable of collection. Therefore, interest revenue, through accretion of the difference between the carrying value of the loans and the expected cash flows (accretable yield), is beingwas recognized on all acquired loans being accounted for under ASC 310-30.



310‑30.

The balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method is presented in the following table as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016.2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

    

Commercial

    

Residential

    

Consumer

    

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Allowance for loan losses:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

1,010

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

1,010

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

17,193

 

 

145

 

 

187

 

 

17,525

Total ending allowance balance

 

$

18,203

 

$

145

 

$

187

 

$

18,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

22,091

 

$

726

 

$

 —

 

$

22,817

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

1,740,833

 

 

55,591

 

 

57,317

 

 

1,853,741

Total ending loans held for investment balance

 

$

1,762,924

 

$

56,317

 

$

57,317

 

$

1,876,558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

    

Commercial

    

Residential

    

Consumer

    

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Allowance for loan losses:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

317

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

317

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

17,005

 

 

292

 

 

237

 

 

17,534

Total ending allowance balance

 

$

17,322

 

$

292

 

$

237

 

$

17,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

10,273

 

$

161

 

$

 —

 

$

10,434

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

1,614,128

 

 

55,461

 

 

50,563

 

 

1,720,152

Total ending loans balance

 

$

1,624,401

 

$

55,622

 

$

50,563

 

$

1,730,586

87

December 31, 2017 Commercial Residential Consumer Total
  (in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:        
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans        
Individually evaluated for impairment $306
 $
 $
 $306
Collectively evaluated for impairment 17,918
 800
 275
 18,993
PCI 43
 2
 
 45
Total ending allowance balance $18,267
 $802
 $275
 $19,344
         
Loans:        
Loans individually evaluated for impairment $6,886
 $186
 $
 $7,072
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment 1,694,948
 178,204
 45,671
 1,918,823
PCI 9,416
 2,338
 
 11,754
Total ending loans balance $1,711,250
 $180,728
 $45,671
 $1,937,649
         
December 31, 2016 Commercial Residential Consumer Total
  (in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:        
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans        
Individually evaluated for impairment $2,626
 $58
 $
 $2,684
Collectively evaluated for impairment 16,018
 1,360
 459
 17,837
PCI 73
 
 1
 74
Total ending allowance balance $18,717
 $1,418
 $460
 $20,595
         
Loans:        
Loans individually evaluated for impairment $13,687
 $398
 $
 $14,085
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment 1,732,324
 174,338
 48,892
 1,955,554
PCI 10,699
 4,543
 11
 15,253
Total ending loans balance $1,756,710
 $179,279
 $48,903
 $1,984,892




The following table presents information on Atlantic Capital’s impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 

 

 

2019

 

 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Balance

 

Interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Balance

 

Interest Income

 

 

Unpaid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Recorded

 

Recognized

 

Unpaid

 

 

 

 

 

of Recorded

 

Recognized

 

 

Principal

 

Recorded

 

Related

 

Investment While

 

During

 

Principal

 

Recorded

 

Related

 

Investment While

 

During

 

    

Balance

    

Investment

    

Allowance

    

Impaired

    

Impairment

    

Balance

    

Investment

    

Allowance

    

Impaired

    

Impairment

 

 

 (in thousands)

Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

6,920

 

 

6,082

 

$

 

$

6,270

 

$

161

 

$

4,346

 

$

4,346

 

$

 

$

4,529

 

$

230

Commercial real estate

 

 

5,005

 

 

4,794

 

 

 

 

4,819

 

 

226

 

 

1,828

 

 

1,665

 

 

 

 

1,691

 

 

 —

Construction and land

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Residential mortgages

 

 

72

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 —

 

 

207

 

 

161

 

 

 

 

173

 

 

 —

Home equity

 

 

700

 

 

700

 

 

 

 

700

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Mortgage warehouse

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Consumer

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

12,697

 

$

11,602

 

$

 —

 

$

11,815

 

$

387

 

$

6,381

 

$

6,172

 

$

 —

 

$

6,393

 

$

230

Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

3,350

 

 

3,350

 

$

886

 

$

3,370

 

$

27

 

$

395

 

$

395

 

$

124

 

$

395

 

$

Commercial real estate

 

 

7,865

 

 

7,865

 

 

124

 

 

7,865

 

 

254

 

 

3,867

 

 

3,867

 

 

193

 

 

4,242

 

 

69

Construction and land

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgages

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage warehouse

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

11,215

 

$

11,215

 

$

1,010

 

$

11,235

 

$

281

 

$

4,262

 

$

4,262

 

$

317

 

$

4,637

 

$

69

Total impaired loans

 

$

23,912

 

$

22,817

 

$

1,010

 

$

23,050

 

$

668

 

$

10,643

 

$

10,434

 

$

317

 

$

11,030

 

$

299

 For the Year Ended
 2017 2016
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Related
Allowance
 Average Balance of Recorded Investment While Impaired Interest Income Recognized During Impairment 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Related
Allowance
 Average Balance of Recorded Investment While Impaired Interest Income Recognized During Impairment
 (in thousands)
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:                   
Commercial and industrial$1,037
 $974
 $
 $1,426
 $55
 $2,593
 $2,295
 $
 $2,861
 $136
Commercial real estate1,771
 1,608
 
 1,838
 1
 24
 24
 
 24
 
Construction and land
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgages231
 186
 
 218
 
 177
 177
 
 179
 2
Home equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage warehouse
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total$3,039
 $2,768
 $
 $3,482
 $56
 $2,794
 $2,496
 $
 $3,064
 $138
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:                   
Commercial and industrial$3,739
 $3,739
 $181
 $3,904
 $197
 $8,735
 $8,735
 $2,437
 $8,795
 $57
Commercial real estate565
 565
 125
 577
 25
 2,633
 2,633
 189
 1,871
 32
Construction and land
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgages
 
 
 
 
 221
 221
 58
 223
 4
Home equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage warehouse
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total$4,304
 $4,304
 $306
 $4,481
 $222
 $11,589
 $11,589
 $2,684
 $10,889
 $93
Total impaired loans$7,343
 $7,072
 $306
 $7,963
 $278
 $14,383
 $14,085
 $2,684
 $13,953
 $231

Atlantic Capital evaluates loans in accordance with ASC 310-40,310‑40, Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. TDRs are loans in which Atlantic Capital has modified the terms and granted an economic concession to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties. These modifications may include interest rate reductions, term extensions and other concessions intended to minimize losses.

As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company had a recorded investment in TDRs of $5.3$13.2 million and $6.6$8.2 million, respectively. The Company had commitments to lend additional funds of $26,000$4,000 and $387,000$28,000 on loans modified as TDRs, as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, a large commercial2019 and industrial borrower was sold. As a part of2018, the deficiency agreement, part of the credit relationship was restructured. The restructureCompany granted restructurings, which included a charge-offmodifications such as payment deferrals and the reclassification of the remaining balance to a TDR of $980,000. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the modification



of terms for one home equity loan included a short term extension of the maturity date. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the modification of terms for one commercial and industrial loan included an extension of the maturity date and related amortization period date of two years. The modification of terms for two commercial real Estate loans established an interest only payment period of six months.
interest-only forbearance.

Loans, by portfolio class, modified as TDRs during the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, are as follows.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-Modification

 

 

Post-Modification

 

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Outstanding

 

    

Number of Loans

    

Recorded Investment

    

Recorded Investment

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 9

 

$

4,699

 

$

4,699

Commercial real estate

 

 4

 

 

8,471

 

 

8,471

Total

 

13

 

$

13,170

 

$

13,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

 1

 

 

4,617

 

 

4,617

Total

 

 1

 

$

4,617

 

$

4,617

 Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
   (in thousands)
December 31, 2017     
Commercial and industrial1 $980
 $980
Home equity1 534
 534
Total2 $1,514
 $1,514
      
December 31, 2016     
Commercial and industrial1 $4,143
 $4,143
Commercial real estate2 614
 614
Total3 $4,757
 $4,757

The Company did not forgive any principal or give any interest rate reductions on TDRs during the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and there were no subsequent defaults of previously identified TDRs.

88

The Bank conducts transactions with its directors and executive officers, including companies in which such officers or directors have beneficial interests. The following is a summary of activity with respect to related-party loans in 20172019 and 2016.2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2019

    

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Balance at January 1,

 

$

 —

 

$

1,885

Additions

 

 

 6

 

 

4,362

Repayments

 

 

(6)

 

 

(6,247)

Balance at December 31,

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 2017 2016
 (in thousands)
Balance at January 1,$2,795
 $3,470
Additions5,950
 8,740
Repayments(6,860) (9,415)
Balance at December 31,$1,885
 $2,795

Atlantic Capital individually rates loans based on internal credit risk ratings using numerous factors, including thorough analysis of historical and expected cash flows, consumer credit risk scores (FICO scores), rating agency information, LTV ratios, collateral, collection experience, and other internal metrics. Atlantic Capital uses a dual rating system. The likelihood of default of a credit transaction is graded in the Obligor Rating. The risk of loss given default is graded in the Facility Rating. The Obligor Rating is determined through thorough credit analysis. Facility Ratings are used to describe the value to the bank that the collateral represents. Facility Ratings are based on the collateral package or market expectations regarding the value or liquidity of the collateral. Ratings are generally reviewed at least annually or more frequently if there is a material change in creditworthiness. Exceptions to this policy may include well collateralized term loans and loans to individuals with limited exposure or complexity.

Atlantic Capital uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass: Loans that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process and that do not meet the criteria of special mention, substandard or doubtful.

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that requires management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.


89


As of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows. (Total loans includes loans held for sale - discontinued operations as of December 31, 2018.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special

 

Substandard

 

Substandard

 

Doubtful

 

 

 

    

Pass

    

Mention

    

Accruing

    

Nonaccruing

    

Nonaccruing

    

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

648,895

 

$

40,179

 

$

10,051

 

$

5,990

 

$

 —

 

$

705,115

Commercial real estate

 

 

891,078

 

 

5,483

 

 

19,504

 

 

263

 

 

 —

 

 

916,328

Construction and land

 

 

127,540

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

127,540

Residential mortgages

 

 

30,941

 

 

 —

 

 

119

 

 

151

 

 

104

 

 

31,315

Home equity

 

 

24,302

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

700

 

 

 —

 

 

25,002

Mortgage warehouse

 

 

13,941

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13,941

Consumer/Other

 

 

56,336

 

 

500

 

 

481

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

57,317

Total loans

 

$

1,793,033

 

$

46,162

 

$

30,155

 

$

7,104

 

$

104

 

$

1,876,558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special

 

Substandard

 

Substandard

 

Doubtful

 

 

 

    

Pass

    

Mention

    

Accruing

    

Nonaccruing

    

Nonaccruing

    

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

December 31, 2018

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

671,992

 

$

6,802

 

$

22,777

 

$

832

 

$

 

$

702,403

Commercial real estate

 

 

946,612

 

 

4,754

 

 

14,914

 

 

126

 

 

1,647

 

 

968,053

Construction and land

 

 

169,687

 

 

40

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

169,752

Residential mortgages

 

 

118,265

 

 

1,119

 

 

1,441

 

 

1,138

 

 

281

 

 

122,244

Home equity

 

 

54,707

 

 

92

 

 

294

 

 

499

 

 

 

 

55,592

Mortgage warehouse

 

 

22,192

 

 

5,775

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,967

Consumer/Other

 

 

57,268

 

 

66

 

 

97

 

 

174

 

 

 

 

57,605

Total loans

 

$

2,040,723

 

$

18,648

 

$

39,548

 

$

2,769

 

$

1,928

 

$

2,103,616


90

 Pass Special Mention Substandard Accruing Substandard Nonaccruing Doubtful Nonaccruing Total
 (in thousands)
December 31, 2017           
Commercial and industrial$572,942
 $15,643
 $21,332
 $16
 $2
 $609,935
Commercial real estate919,939
 6,227
 8,906
 
 1,592
 936,664
Construction and land115,255
 
 
 
 
 115,255
Residential mortgages100,342
 1,075
 753
 398
 321
 102,889
Home equity74,841
 64
 310
 285
 
 75,500
Mortgage warehouse39,981
 
 
 
 
 39,981
Consumer/Other45,422
 57
 192
 
 
 45,671
Total loans, excluding PCI loans$1,868,722
 $23,066
 $31,493
 $699
 $1,915
 $1,925,895
Commercial and industrial$
 $3,881
 $1,543
 $
 $
 $5,424
Commercial real estate3,151
 212
 276
 
 112
 3,751
Construction and land222
 7
 11
 
 
 240
Residential mortgages428
 493
 674
 
 
 1,595
Home equity34
 354
 356
 
 
 744
Mortgage warehouse
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer/Other
 
 
 
 
 
Total PCI loans$3,835
 $4,947
 $2,860
 $
 $112
 $11,754
            
 Pass Special Mention Substandard Accruing Substandard Nonaccruing Doubtful Nonaccruing Total
 (in thousands)
December 31, 2016           
Commercial and industrial$494,617
 $3,160
 $26,399
 $3
 $471
 $524,650
Commercial real estate843,924
 5,513
 5,571
 
 
 855,008
Construction and land213,981
 4,789
 64
 
 
 218,834
Residential mortgages97,660
 586
 747
 147
 
 99,140
Home equity75,031
 168
 397
 
 
 75,596
Mortgage warehouse147,519
 
 
 
 
 147,519
Consumer/Other48,680
 190
 22
 
 
 48,892
Total loans, excluding PCI loans$1,921,412
 $14,406
 $33,200
 $150
 $471
 $1,969,639
Commercial and industrial$4,650
 $299
 $614
 $
 $848
 $6,411
Commercial real estate477
 240
 2,716
 
 337
 3,770
Construction and land229
 8
 281
 
 
 518
Residential mortgages59
 1,232
 1,016
 
 474
 2,781
Home equity364
 834
 564
 
 
 1,762
Mortgage warehouse
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer/Other1
 
 10
 
 
 11
Total PCI loans$5,780
 $2,613
 $5,201
 $
 $1,659
 $15,253
            



Atlantic Capital monitors loans by past due status. The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 by class of loans.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

Accruing 30‑89

 

Accruing

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accruing

 

Days

 

90+ Days

 

 

 

 

 

    

Current

    

Past Due

    

Past Due

    

Nonaccruing

    

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Loans by Classification

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial and industrial

 

$

695,026

 

$

4,099

 

$

 —

 

$

5,990

 

$

705,115

Commercial real estate

 

 

914,787

 

 

1,194

 

 

85

 

 

262

 

 

916,328

Construction and land

 

 

127,540

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

127,540

Residential mortgages

 

 

30,352

 

 

707

 

 

 —

 

 

256

 

 

31,315

Home equity

 

 

24,302

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

700

 

 

25,002

Mortgage warehouse

 

 

13,941

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

13,941

Consumer

 

 

57,181

 

 

136

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

57,317

Total Loans

 

$

1,863,129

 

$

6,136

 

$

85

 

$

7,208

 

$

1,876,558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

Accruing 30‑89

 

Accruing

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accruing

 

Days

 

90+ Days

 

 

 

 

 

    

Current

    

Past Due

    

Past Due

    

Nonaccruing

    

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Loans by Classification

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial and industrial

 

$

692,308

 

$

8,785

 

$

478

 

$

832

 

$

702,403

Commercial real estate

 

 

963,579

 

 

2,701

 

 

 —

 

 

1,773

 

 

968,053

Construction and land

 

 

169,752

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

169,752

Residential mortgages

 

 

119,932

 

 

893

 

 

 —

 

 

1,419

 

 

122,244

Home equity

 

 

54,714

 

 

379

 

 

 —

 

 

499

 

 

55,592

Mortgage warehouse

 

 

27,967

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

27,967

Consumer

 

 

57,371

 

 

59

 

 

 1

 

 

174

 

 

57,605

Total Loans

 

$

2,085,623

 

$

12,817

 

$

479

 

$

4,697

 

$

2,103,616

 As of December 31, 2017
 Accruing Current 
30-89
Days
Past Due
 
Accruing
90+ Days
Past Due
 Nonaccruing PCI Loans Total
 (in thousands)
Loans by Classification           
Commercial and industrial$606,677
 $3,239
 $
 $19
 $5,424
 $615,359
Commercial real estate932,916
 2,156
 
 1,592
 3,751
 940,415
Construction and land114,988
 267
 
 
 240
 115,495
Residential mortgages100,402
 1,470
 298
 719
 1,595
 104,484
Home equity75,081
 135
 
 284
 744
 76,244
Mortgage warehouse39,981
 
 
 
 
 39,981
Consumer45,599
 72
 
 
 
 45,671
Total Loans$1,915,644
 $7,339
 $298
 $2,614
 $11,754
 $1,937,649

 As of December 31, 2016
 Accruing Current 
30-89
Days
Past Due
 
Accruing
90+ Days
Past Due
 Nonaccruing PCI Loans Total
 (in thousands)
Loans by Classification           
Commercial and industrial$520,908
 $3,079
 $189
 $474
 $6,411
 $531,061
Commercial real estate852,626
 2,382
 
 
 3,770
 858,778
Construction and land218,290
 544
 
 
 518
 219,352
Residential mortgages97,901
 664
 428
 147
 2,781
 101,921
Home equity74,420
 884
 292
 
 1,762
 77,358
Mortgage warehouse147,519
 
 
 
 
 147,519
Consumer48,558
 249
 85
 
 11
 48,903
Total Loans$1,960,222
 $7,802
 $994
 $621
 $15,253
 $1,984,892


NOTE 7 – PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT


Premises and equipment consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 

 

    

2019

    

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Land and improvements

 

$

 —

 

$

1,902

Buildings and improvements

 

 

 —

 

 

7,402

Leasehold improvements

 

 

9,040

 

 

7,745

Equipment, furniture and software

 

 

11,636

 

 

13,339

Right of use asset - leases

 

 

11,940

 

 

 —

Projects in process

 

 

147

 

 

 —

    Premises and equipment-gross

 

 

32,763

 

 

30,388

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(10,227)

 

 

(12,887)

   Premises and equipment-net

 

$

22,536

 

$

17,501

  As of December 31,
  2017 2016
  (in thousands)
Land and improvements $2,036
 $2,036
Buildings and improvements 7,745
 7,704
Leasehold improvements 4,064
 3,730
Equipment and furniture 10,998
 10,016
Projects in process 736
 518
     Premises and equipment-gross 25,579
 24,004
Accumulated depreciation (13,525) (12,046)
    Premises and equipment-net $12,054
 $11,958

Depreciation expense was $1.8 million, $1.9 million, and $1.6 million $2.0 million,in 2019, 2018, and $1.1 million in 2017, 2016,respectively.

91

There were no premises and 2015, respectively.



Branch premisesequipment held for sale for discontinued operations as of December 31, 20162019. Premises and equipment held for sale for discontinued operations as of December 31, 2018 totaled $3.0$7.7 million. This balance represents one branchpremises and equipment related to the Branch Sale that closed on April 5, 2019.

Leases

A lease is defined as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases” (Topic 842) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 842. For the Company, Topic 842 primarily affected the accounting treatment for operating lease agreements in which was soldthe Company is the lessee.

Operating leases in which the Company is the lessee are recorded as operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities, included in premises and equipment and other liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company does not currently have any significant finance leases in which it is the lessee.

Operating lease ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and operating lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized at lease commencement based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using a discount rate that represents the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date. ROU assets are further adjusted for lease incentives. Operating lease expense, which is comprised of amortization of the ROU asset and the implicit interest accreted on the operating lease liability, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and is recorded in net occupancy expense in the second quarterConsolidated Statements of 2017. There were no branch premises heldOperations.

The Company’s leases relate primarily to office space and bank branches with remaining lease terms of generally 1 to 12 years. Certain lease arrangements contain extension options which typically range from 5 to 10 years at the then fair market rental rates. As these extension options are not generally considered reasonably certain of exercise, they are not included in the lease term. Portions of certain properties are subleased for sale asterms extending through 2024. As of December 31, 2017.


2019, operating lease ROU assets and liabilities were $11.9 million and $16.9 million, respectively. The following representsCompany elected not to include short-term leases (i.e., leases with initial terms of twelve months or less) on the future cash outflows relatedConsolidated Balance Sheets. Additionally, the Company elected, for all classes of underlying assets, not to separate lease obligations at December 31, 2017.
 December 31, 2017
 (in thousands)
2018$2,509
20191,814
20201,815
20211,850
20221,893
Thereafter9,013
Total$18,894

The currentand non-lease components and instead to account for them as a single lease for the corporate headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia has expired and is being renewed on a monthly basis until the corporate headquarters is relocated in the second quarter of 2018. The future lease obligation of the new corporate headquarters is included in the table above, commencing in May 2018. component.

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 was $2.7$2.3 million, $2.2$3.1 million, and $1.4$2.7 million, respectively, which were included in occupancy expense in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations.

The table below summarizes the Company’s net lease cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

    

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

Operating lease cost

 

$

2,274

Short-term lease cost

 

 

44

Sublease income

 

 

(252)

Net lease cost

 

$

2,066


92

The tables below summarize other information related to the Company’s operating leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

    

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

Operating cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities

 

$

1,944

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities

 

 

17,807

December 31, 2019

Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases

9.0

Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases

3.1

%

The table below summarizes the maturity of remaining lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

     

 (in thousands)

Year Ended:

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

$

2,062

December 31, 2021

 

 

2,176

December 31, 2022

 

 

2,418

December 31, 2023

 

 

2,025

December 31, 2024

 

 

1,937

Thereafter

 

 

9,437

Total future minimum lease payments

 

 

20,055

Less: Interest

 

 

(3,190)

Present value of net future minimum lease payments

 

$

16,865

On April 5, 2019, Atlantic Capital completed the Branch Sale.  Eight of these properties were owned by Atlantic Capital and nine were leased. The Company’s ROU asset and lease liability were reduced during the second quarter of 2019 by $3.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, as a result of this divestiture.

NOTE 8 – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS


The carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets is summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

December 31, 

 

    

2019

    

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Core deposit intangible

 

$

9,544

 

$

9,544

Less: accumulated amortization

 

 

(6,100)

 

 

(5,853)

Less: impairment to-date related to divested branches

 

 

(3,444)

 

 

(2,286)

Core deposit intangible, net - discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

1,405

Servicing assets, net

 

 

3,027

 

 

2,983

Total intangibles subject to amortization, net

 

 

3,027

 

 

4,388

Goodwill - discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

4,555

Goodwill - continuing operations

 

 

19,925

 

 

17,135

Total goodwill and other intangible assets, net

 

$

22,952

 

$

26,078

  December 31,
  2017 2016
  (in thousands)
Core deposit intangible $9,544
 $9,544
Less: accumulated amortization (4,624) (2,971)
Less: impairment related to divested branches (2,286) (1,949)
Core deposit intangible, net 2,634
 4,624
Servicing assets, net 3,240
 3,184
Total intangibles subject to amortization, net 5,874
 7,808
Goodwill 21,759
 21,759
Total goodwill and other intangible assets, net $27,633
 $29,567

During 2016, Atlantic Capital recorded measurement period adjustments that decreased goodwill by $1.6 million. The adjustments reduced the TriNet servicing asset, increased the book value of securities available-for-sale, and increased the deferred tax asset.

The Company conducted its annual impairment testing as of October 1, 2017,2019, utilizing a qualitative assessment. Factors that management considered in this assessment included macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, overall financial performance of the Company and changes in the composition or carrying amount of net assets. In addition, management considered the increase in the Company’s common stock price and market value. Based on these assessments, management concluded that the 20172019 annual qualitative impairment assessment indicated that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value exceeded the carrying value (including goodwill). Therefore, a step one quantitative analysis was not required.


93

There were no

On April 5, 2019, the Bank completed the Branch Sale. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, Atlantic Capital allocated a proportionate share of its goodwill balance to the discontinued operations on a relative fair value basis and performed a qualitative assessment impairment test for the goodwill allocated to continuing operations. The qualitative goodwill impairment chargesanalysis of continuing operations indicated that it was more likely than not that the estimated fair value exceeded the carrying value as of the assessment date.

Based on a relative fair value analysis performed through the date of the Branch Sale, goodwill impairment in the amount of $1.8 million related to the Branch Sale was recorded during the second quarter of 2019. Additionally, goodwill impairment in 2017, 2016 or 2015, respectively.the amount of $69,000 related to the sale of the trust business was recorded during the second quarter of 2018. The following table presents activity for goodwill and other intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Goodwill

    

Core Deposit Intangible

    

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

21,759

 

$

2,634

 

$

24,393

Amortization

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,229)

 

 

(1,229)

Impairment, due to trust business sale

 

 

(69)

 

 

 —

 

 

(69)

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

 

21,690

 

 

1,405

 

 

23,095

Amortization

 

 

 —

 

 

(247)

 

 

(247)

Impairment, due to Branch Sale

 

 

(1,765)

 

 

(1,158)

 

 

(2,923)

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

$

19,925

 

$

 —

 

$

19,925

  Goodwill Core Deposit Intangible Total
  (in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015 $23,352
 $9,018
 $32,370
Amortization 
 (2,445) (2,445)
Impairment, due to branch divestiture 
 (1,949) (1,949)
Measurement period adjustments (1,593) 
 (1,593)
Balance at December 31, 2016 21,759
 4,624
 26,383
Amortization 
 (1,653) (1,653)
Impairment, due to branch divestiture 
 (337) (337)
Balance at December 31, 2017 $21,759
 $2,634
 $24,393

The

Atlantic Capital recognized amortization expense foron its core deposit intangible for 2017, 2016,of $247,000,  $1.2 million, and 2015 was $1.7 million $2.4 million,for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and $526,000, respectively,2017, respectively, which was recognizedincluded in operating expenses.noninterest expense. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for future periods forCompany recorded impairment due to the core depositBranch Sale totaling $1.2 million during 2019. There were no events or circumstances that led management to believe that any impairment existed at December 31, 2019 in Atlantic Capital’s other intangible is as follows:

  Core Deposit Intangible Amortization
  (in thousands)
2018 $1,229
2019 846
2020 463
2021 96
2022 
Thereafter 
Total $2,634

assets.

NOTE 9 – SERVICING RIGHTS

SBA Servicing Rights

SBA servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value. Subsequently, Atlantic Capital accounts for SBA servicing rights using the amortization method and they are included in goodwill and intangible assets, net.other intangibles, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the balance of SBA loans sold and serviced by Atlantic Capital totaled $135.8$185.5 million and $107.0$161.51 million, respectively.

Changes in the balance of SBA servicing assets for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 are presented in the following table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

SBA Loan Servicing Assets

 

2019

    

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Beginning carrying value, net

 

$

2,539

 

$

2,635

Additions

 

 

1,226

 

 

823

Amortization

 

 

(1,034)

 

 

(919)

Ending carrying value

 

$

2,731

 

$

2,539

94

SBA Loan Servicing Rights Twelve months ended December 31,
  2017 2016
  (in thousands)
Beginning carrying value, net $2,359
 $1,687
Additions 1,022
 1,077
Amortization (746) (405)
             Ending carrying value $2,635
 $2,359

At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the sensitivity of the fair value of the SBA loan servicing rights to immediate changes in key economic assumptions are presented in the table below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sensitivity of the SBA Servicing Assets

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Fair value of retained servicing assets

 

$

2,842

 

$

2,630

 

Weighted average life

 

 

3.77 years

 

 

4.83 years

 

Prepayment speed:

 

 

14.87

%

 

11.92

%

Decline in fair value due to a 10% adverse change

 

$

(150)

 

$

(131)

 

Decline in fair value due to a 20% adverse change

 

$

(254)

 

$

(223)

 

Weighted average discount rate

 

 

13.66

%

 

14.42

%

Decline in fair value due to a 100 bps adverse change

 

$

(98)

 

$

(101)

 

Decline in fair value due to a 200 bps adverse change

 

$

(156)

 

$

(165)

 

Sensitivity of the SBA Servicing Asset December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Fair value of retained servicing assets $2,865
 $2,474
 
Weighted average life 6.22 years
 6.52 years
 
Prepayment speed: 8.64
%7.67
%
Decline in fair value due to a 10% adverse change $(103) $(89) 
Decline in fair value due to a 20% adverse change $(181) $(151) 
Weighted average discount rate 13.01
%12.27
%
Decline in fair value due to a 100 bps adverse change $(103) $(97) 
Decline in fair value due to a 200 bps adverse change $(180) $(168) 

The above sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the amounts indicate, changes in fair value based on valuation assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

TriNet Servicing Rights

TriNet servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value. Subsequently, Atlantic Capital accounts for TriNet servicing rights using the amortization method and they are included in goodwill and intangible assets,other intangibles, net.

Changes in the balance of TriNet servicing assets for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 are presented in the following table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

TriNet Servicing Assets

 

2019

    

2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Beginning carrying value, net

 

$

444

 

$

605

Additions

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Amortization

 

 

(148)

 

 

(161)

Ending carrying value

 

$

296

 

$

444

TriNet Servicing Rights Twelve months ended December 31,
  2017 2016
  (in thousands)
Beginning carrying value, net $825
 $1,175
Additions 
 406
Amortization (185) (205)
Sale of servicing assets (35) 
Impairment 
 (551)
             Ending carrying value $605
 $825


At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the sensitivity of the fair value of the TriNet servicing rights to immediate changes in key economic assumptions are presented in the table below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sensitivity of the TriNet Servicing Assets

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Fair value of retained servicing assets

 

$

414

 

$

515

 

Weighted average life

 

 

5.58 years

 

 

6.48 years

 

Prepayment speed:

 

 

5.00

%

 

5.00

%

Decline in fair value due to a 10% adverse change

 

$

(5)

 

$

(7)

 

Decline in fair value due to a 20% adverse change

 

$

(10)

 

$

(14)

 

Weighted average discount rate

 

 

8.00

%

 

8.00

%

Decline in fair value due to a 100 bps adverse change

 

$

(9)

 

$

(13)

 

Decline in fair value due to a 200 bps adverse change

 

$

(18)

 

$

(25)

 


Sensitivity of the TriNet Servicing Rights December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Fair value of retained servicing assets $697
 $840
 
Weighted average life 7.37 years
 8.47 years
 
Prepayment speed: 5.00
%5.00
%
Decline in fair value due to a 10% adverse change $(10) $(12) 
Decline in fair value due to a 20% adverse change $(20) $(24) 
Weighted average discount rate 8.00
%8.00
%
Decline in fair value due to a 100 bps adverse change $(19) $(25) 
Decline in fair value due to a 200 bps adverse change $(37) $(49) 

The above sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the amounts indicate, changes in fair value based on valuation assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.


95

NOTE 10 - DEPOSITS
 December 31,
 2017 2016
 (in thousands)
Non-interest bearing demand deposits$732,442
 $643,471
Interest-bearing demand deposits306,331
 264,062
Savings and money market deposits1,144,464
 940,425
Time deposits less than $250,000118,412
 137,299
Time deposits $250,000 or greater20,200
 20,511
Brokered deposits128,816
 200,223
Total Deposits$2,450,665
 $2,205,991
    
Deposits to be assumed in branch sales$
 $31,589
There were no

NOTE 10 – DEPOSITS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

 

$

824,646

 

$

602,252

Interest-bearing demand deposits

 

 

373,727

 

 

252,490

Savings and money market deposits

 

 

1,174,437

 

 

987,908

Time deposits less than $250,000

 

 

37,680

 

 

3,630

Time deposits $250,000 or greater

 

 

6,709

 

 

6,993

Brokered deposits

 

 

81,847

 

 

99,241

Total deposits - continuing operations

 

$

2,499,046

 

$

1,952,514

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits to be assumed - discontinued operations

 

$

 —

 

$

585,429

Time deposits to be assumed in branch salesless than $250,000 at December 31, 2017. Deposits2019 increased compared to be assumed in branch sales totaled $31.6 million at December 31, 2016, and represented deposits at one branch. Approximately $21.9 million2018 due to the Company’s growth in deposits were sold as part of the divestiture which closed during the second quarter of 2017.

its fintech partnership with a financial technology firm that offers CD-secured loans to its customers in order to build credit and/or improve their credit score. 

Brokered certificate of deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or more are participated out by the deposit brokers in shares of $100,000 or less.

Overdrawn deposits accounts reclassified as loans were $1.1$383,000 and $1.3 million and $630,000 at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. There were $93.9$32.3 million and $104.9$65.3 million in investment securities pledged to secure public deposits and other secured borrowings as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

Deposits of certain officers, directors, and their associates totaled $8.0$9.2 million and $3.1$8.4 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.








The scheduled maturities of time and brokered deposits as of December 31, 20172019 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Time

    

Brokered

 

 

(in thousands)

2020

 

$

38,446

 

$

79,276

2021

 

 

5,005

 

 

2,571

2022

 

 

866

 

 

 —

2023

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

2024

 

 

44

 

 

 —

Thereafter

 

 

28

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

44,389

 

$

81,847

  Time Brokered
  (in thousands)
2018 $73,022
 $123,718
2019 38,629
 2,527
2020 15,102
 2,571
2021 7,444
 
2022 4,373
 
Thereafter 42
 
Total $138,612
 $128,816

NOTE 11 – OTHER BORROWINGS AND LONG TERM DEBT

As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, Atlantic Capital had no Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

  December 31, 2017   December 31, 2016
  Balance Interest Rate   Balance Interest Rate
  (in thousands)   (in thousands)
FHLB short-term borrowings:     FHLB short-term borrowings:    
Fixed rate advance maturing January 16, 2018 $45,000
 1.40% Fixed rate advance maturing January 17, 2017 $40,000
 0.64%

 

 

 Fixed rate advance maturing January 24, 2017 40,000
 0.61%

 

 

 Fixed rate advance maturing January 30, 2017 30,000
 0.62%
Total $45,000
     $110,000
  
outstanding.

Interest expense for FHLB borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016,was $817,000, $2.4 million, and 2015 was $1.5 million, $558,000, and $290,000, respectively.

96

At December 31, 2017,2019, the Company had available line of credit commitments with the FHLB totaling $660.0$723.3 million, of which $45.0 million was advanced.with no outstanding FHLB advances. However, based on actual collateral pledged, $193.1$155.8. million was available. At December 31, 2017,2019, the Company had an available line of credit based on the collateral available of $357.1$410.9 million with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Interest expense on federal funds purchased for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016,totaled $479,000,  $303,000, and 2015 totaled $222,000, $218,000, and $73,000, respectively.

On September 28, 2015, Atlantic Capital issued subordinated notes (the “Notes”) totaling $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount. The Notes are due September 30, 2025 and bear a fixed rate of interest of 6.25% per year until September 29, 2020. From September 30, 2020 to the maturity date, the interest rate will be a floating rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 468 basis points. The Notes were priced at 100% of their par value. The Notes qualify as Tier 2 regulatory capital.

Subordinated debt is summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Floating rate 10 year capital securities, with interest paid semi-annually at an annual fixed rate of 6.25% until September 30, 2020

 

$

50,000

 

$

50,000

Principal amount of subordinated debt

 

$

50,000

 

$

50,000

Less debt issuance costs

 

 

127

 

 

296

Subordinated debt, net

 

$

49,873

 

$

49,704

  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  (in thousands
Floating rate 10 year capital securities, with interest paid semi-annually at an annual fixed rate of 6.25% until September 30, 2020 $50,000
 $50,000
Principal amount of subordinated debt $50,000
 $50,000
Less debt issuance costs  465
  634
Subordinated debt, net $49,535
 $49,366

All subordinated debt outstanding at December 31, 20172019 matures after more than five years.



NOTE 12 – OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

Other comprehensive (loss) income for Atlantic Capital consists of changes in net unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale and derivatives. The following tables present a summary of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income balances for the applicable periods.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

    

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-Tax

 

(Expense)

 

After-Tax

 

Pre-Tax

 

(Expense)

 

After-Tax

 

Pre-Tax

 

(Expense)

 

After-Tax

 

   

Amount

   

Benefit

   

Amount

   

Amount

   

Benefit

   

Amount

   

Amount

   

Benefit

   

Amount

 

 

(in thousands)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income beginning of period

 

$

(13,743)

 

 

3,438

 

$

(10,305)

 

$

(6,274)

 

$

2,415

 

$

(3,859)

 

$

(9,144)

 

$

3,519

 

$

(5,625)

Reclassification of tax effects from AOCI

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(844)

 

 

(844)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Unrealized net (losses) gains on investment securities available-for-sale

 

 

15,888

 

 

(3,974)

 

 

11,914

 

 

(8,070)

 

 

2,018

 

 

(6,052)

 

 

3,876

 

 

(1,491)

 

 

2,385

Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains)/losses on investment securities available-for-sale

 

 

(907)

 

 

227

 

 

(680)

 

 

1,855

 

 

(464)

 

 

1,391

 

 

181

 

 

(70)

 

 

111

Unrealized net (losses) gains on derivatives

 

 

4,843

 

 

(1,211)

 

 

3,632

 

 

(1,254)

 

 

313

 

 

(941)

 

 

(1,187)

 

 

457

 

 

(730)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income end of period

 

$

6,081

 

$

(1,520)

 

$

4,561

 

$

(13,743)

 

$

3,438

 

$

(10,305)

 

$

(6,274)

 

$

2,415

 

$

(3,859)

97

 For the Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
 Pre-Tax Amount Income Tax (Expense) Benefit After-Tax Amount Pre-Tax Amount Income Tax (Expense) Benefit After-Tax Amount Pre-Tax Amount Income Tax (Expense) Benefit After-Tax Amount
 (in thousands)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income beginning of period$(9,144) $3,519
 $(5,625) $(2,455) $939
 $(1,516) $986
 $(377) $609
Unrealized net (losses) gains on investment securities available-for-sale3,876
 (1,491) 2,385
 (6,227) 2,403
 (3,824) (4,126) 1,578
 (2,548)
Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains on investment securities available-for-sale181
 (70) 111
 (44) 17
 (27) (10) 4
 (6)
Unrealized net (losses) gains on derivatives(1,187) 457
 (730) (418) 160
 (258) 695
 (266) 429
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income end of period$(6,274) $2,415
 $(3,859) $(9,144) $3,519
 $(5,625) $(2,455) $939
 $(1,516)



NOTE 13 – EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.

Diluted earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and the dilutive effects of the shares awarded under the stock option plan, based on the treasury stock method using an average fair market value of the stock during the respective periods.

The following table represents the earnings per share calculations from continuing operations and discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015.2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

28,158

 

$

28,050

 

$

(4,756)

Net income from discontinued operations

 

 

21,697

 

 

482

 

 

1,030

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

 

$

49,855

 

$

28,532

 

$

(3,726)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Basic (1)

 

 

23,315,562

 

 

25,947,038

 

 

25,592,731

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Stock options and performance share awards

 

 

162,439

 

 

164,717

 

 

229,354

Diluted

 

 

23,478,001

 

 

26,111,755

 

 

25,822,085

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share - basic

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net income (loss) per common share - continuing operations

 

$

1.21

 

$

1.08

 

$

(0.19)

Net income per common share - discontinued operations

 

 

0.93

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.04

Net income (loss) per common share - basic

 

$

2.14

 

$

1.10

 

$

(0.15)

Net income (loss) per common share - diluted

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net income (loss) per common share - continuing operations

 

$

1.20

 

$

1.07

 

$

(0.19)

Net income per common share - discontinued operations

 

 

0.92

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.04

Net income (loss) per common share - diluted

 

$

2.12

 

$

1.09

 

$

(0.15)


  Year Ended
  December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
  (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $(3,726) $13,395
 $(1,319)
Weighted average shares outstanding      
Basic (1)
 25,592,731
 24,763,522
 15,283,437
Effect of diluted securities:      
Stock options and warrants 229,354
 423,158
 380,428
Diluted 25,822,085
 25,186,680
 15,663,865
Income (loss) per common share:      
Basic $(0.15) $0.54
 $(0.09)
Diluted $(0.15) $0.53
 $(0.09)

(1)

Unvested restricted shares are participating securities and included in basic share calculations.

(1) Unvested restricted shares are participating securities and included in basic share calculations.

Stock options and warrants outstanding of 550, 747,150, 2,124, and 0550 at December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively, have not been included in diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented. These awards were considered anti-dilutive because the exercise price of the award was higher than the market value of the shares.

The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Atlantic Capital which were approved by the Board of Directors on March 24, 2015 and by Atlantic Capital’s shareholders on May 21, 2015, authorize Atlantic Capital to issue 110,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 10,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock, no par value per share, and 100,000,000 shares are designated as common stock, no par value per share. Atlantic Capital had 25,712,90921,751,026 and 25,093,13525,290,419 shares of common stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

The primary source of funds available to Atlantic Capital is payments of dividends from the Bank. The Bank has not paid any dividends totaling $45.5 million and $30.0 million to Atlantic Capital in 2017 or 2016.2019 and 2018, respectively. Banking laws and other regulations limit the amount of dividends a bank subsidiary may pay without prior regulatory approval. Additionally, Atlantic Capital’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders will depend on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to Atlantic Capital. The Bank is subject to regulatory restrictions on the payment of cash dividends, which generally may be paid only from current earnings.



98

On November 14, 2018, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to $85 million of its issued and outstanding common stock. The timing and amounts of any repurchases depend on certain factors, including but not limited to market conditions and prices, available funds and alternative uses of capital. The stock repurchase program may be carried out through open-market purchases, block trades, negotiated private transactions and pursuant to a trading plan that was adopted in accordance with Rule 10b‑18 and Rule 10b5‑1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Atlantic Capital repurchased 3,694,902 shares and 822,100 shares in 2019 and 2018, respectively, for a total of $64.8 million and $14.2 million, respectively. Since the announcement of the $85.0 million buyback program in November 2018, Atlantic Capital has repurchased 4.5 million shares totaling $79.0 million.

NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES


The components of income tax expense from continuing operations included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 

(in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Current income tax expense (benefit):

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Federal

 

$

(2,587)

 

$

3,710

 

$

(561)

State

 

 

(183)

 

 

371

 

 

35

Total

 

 

(2,770)

 

 

4,081

 

 

(526)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit):

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Federal

 

 

9,646

 

 

(1,798)

 

 

24,354

State

 

 

735

 

 

4,024

 

 

(113)

Total

 

 

10,381

 

 

2,226

 

 

24,241

Total income tax from continuing operations

 

$

7,611

 

$

6,307

 

$

23,715

(in thousands) 2017 2016 2015
Current income tax expense (benefit):      
Federal $(7) $4,497
 $1,204
State 140
 130
 270
Total 133
 4,627
 1,474
       
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):      
Federal 24,354
 2,679
 (504)
State (113) 643
 (176)
Total 24,241
 3,322
 (680)
Total income tax $24,374
 $7,949
 $794

The income tax expense differs from the statutory rate of 21% in 2019 and 2018 and 35% in 2017, 2016 and 2015, as indicated in the following analysis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 

(in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Tax expense (benefit) based on federal statutory rate

 

$

7,518

 

$

7,215

 

$

6,636

State taxes, net of federal benefit

 

 

572

 

 

899

 

 

102

Income tax credits

 

 

(10)

 

 

(103)

 

 

(208)

Tax-exempt earnings

 

 

(822)

 

 

(717)

 

 

(1,221)

Excess benefit

 

 

 4

 

 

(142)

 

 

(298)

Nondeductible expenses

 

 

135

 

 

116

 

 

361

Change in uncertain tax positions reserve

 

 

137

 

 

56

 

 

(109)

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(111)

 

 

(996)

 

 

(649)

Revaluation of deferred tax asset excluding valuation allowance due to tax reform

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

18,983

Other

 

 

188

 

 

(21)

 

 

118

Total income tax from continuing operations

 

$

7,611

 

$

6,307

 

$

23,715

(in thousands) 2017 2016 2015
       
Tax expense (benefit) based on federal statutory rate $7,227
 $7,470
 $(184)
State taxes, net of federal benefit 170
 716
 (78)
Income tax credits (208) (51) (48)
Tax-exempt earnings (1,221) (893) (791)
Nondeductible merger related expenses 
 178
 1,152
Excess benefit (298) 
 
Excess parachute payments under Section 280G 
 115
 319
Nondeductible expenses 361
 322
 441
Federal rate adjustment 
 
 (27)
Change in uncertain tax positions reserve (109) 8
 79
Change in valuation allowance (649) 
 
Revaluation of deferred tax asset excluding valuation allowance due to tax reform 18,983
 
 
Other 118
 84
 (69)
Total income tax $24,374
 $7,949
 $794






Deferred income tax assets and liabilities result from differences between assets and liabilities measured for financial reporting purposes and for income tax return purposes. These assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws. The net deferred tax asset is included as a component of other assets at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and is comprised of the following:

99

(in thousands) 2017 2016
Net operating loss carryforward $29,754
 $46,334
Federal tax credits 5,648
 5,505
State credits 482
 96
Allowance for loan losses 4,794
 7,966
Stock-based compensation 912
 1,226
Deferred loan fees and costs, net 
 1,369
Other real estate owned 305
 711
Goodwill and other intangibles 
 212
Transaction costs 803
 1,483
Unfunded commitments 224
 262
Organizational costs 145
 274
Nonaccrual loan interest 402
 278
Net unrealized losses on investment securities available‑for‑sale 1,396
 3,709
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges 172
 
Long term incentive plan 562
 1,649
Other 407
 857
Total gross deferred tax assets 46,006
 71,931
Less: valuation allowance (8,532) (9,181)
Net deferred tax asset 37,474
 62,750
     
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges 
 191
Depreciation 765
 772
Deferred loan costs 241
 
Other 245
 214
Total gross deferred tax liabilities 1,251
 1,177
Net deferred tax assets $36,223
 $61,573
On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“the Tax Act”) was enacted into law. The Tax Act reduces the U.S. statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning in 2018, which resulted in the remeasurement of the federal portion of our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017, from 35% to the new 21% tax rate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

Net operating loss carryforward

 

$

15,743

 

$

25,992

Federal tax credits

 

 

5,342

 

 

5,342

State credits

 

 

 —

 

 

27

Allowance for loan losses

 

 

4,545

 

 

4,374

Stock-based compensation

 

 

729

 

 

699

Other real estate owned

 

 

206

 

 

371

Transaction costs

 

 

152

 

 

787

Deferred rent

 

 

 —

 

 

815

Lease liability

 

 

4,158

 

 

 —

Nonaccrual loan interest

 

 

509

 

 

530

Net unrealized losses on investment securities available‑for‑sale

 

 

 —

 

 

2,950

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges

 

 

 —

 

 

486

Long term incentive plan

 

 

204

 

 

471

Other

 

 

2,197

 

 

2,229

Total gross deferred tax assets

 

 

33,785

 

 

45,073

Less: valuation allowance

 

 

(6,698)

 

 

(7,446)

Net deferred tax asset

 

 

27,087

 

 

37,627

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

626

 

 

1,215

Deferred loan costs

 

 

429

 

 

365

Other

 

 

301

 

 

192

Right of use asset - leases

 

 

2,944

 

 

 —

Net unrealized gains on investment securities available‑for‑sale

 

 

796

 

 

 —

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges

 

 

725

 

 

 —

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

 

 

5,821

 

 

1,772

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

21,266

 

$

35,855

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more‑likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A valuation allowance is provided when it is deemed more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the ability to realize the deferred tax assets, management considers the four possible sources of taxable income including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies that would, if necessary, be implemented. At December 31, 2015,2018, the Company recordedhad a valuation allowance of $9.5$7.4 million. This valuation allowance relatedrelates to the portion of net operating losses and credits that the Company will not be able to utilize due to limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. In the third quarter of 2019, the Company recorded a $700,000 favorable reduction of the valuation allowance on Federal deferred tax assets through discontinued operations from the finalization of the Branch Sale. At December 31, 2016, the Atlantic Capital decreased the valuation allowance to $9.2 million. The adjustment to the valuation allowance related to a decrease in the federal net operating loss expected to be utilized and increases in certain state carryforwards that are expected to be utilized. At December 31, 2017,2019, the Company increased the valuation allowance by $0.9 million for certain state carryforwards that are expected to expire before being utilized. This was offset by a $1.6 million reduction to the valuation allowance due to the change in Federal tax rate that is applied to attributes for whichhad a valuation allowance exists.

of $6.7 million.

ASC 740-10-65740‑10‑65 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company has reviewed and evaluated the relevant



technical merits of each of its tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10-65740‑10‑65 and determined there are no uncertain tax positions that would have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2017.
2019.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefit related to uncertain tax positions is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

278

 

$

216

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

 

 

174

 

 

62

Settlement of prior year positions

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Balance at end of year

 

$

452

 

$

278

100

(in thousands) 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of year $319
 $311
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year 14
 8
Settlement of prior year positions (117) 
Balance at end of year $216
 $319

The amount of unrecognized tax positions that would have impacted the effective tax rate if recognized was $171,000.

$357,000.

With the adoption of ASC 740-10-65,740‑10‑65, the Company elected to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to any future unrecognized tax benefits in current income tax expense. Interest in the amount of $40,000$65,000 and $39,000$51,000 was accrued as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The total amount of interest and penalties recognized in current income tax expense during 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016was $14,000, $11,000 and 2015 was $30,000, $32,000 and $7,000,$3,000, respectively.

At December 31, 2017,2019, Atlantic Capital hashad operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of $111.2$50.2 million, which are available to offset future federal taxable income, if any, through 2035. Atlantic Capital hashad operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of $125.2$101 million, which are available to offset future state taxable income, if any, through 2035. In addition,Additionally, Atlantic Capital hashad general business credits of approximately $5.4$5.3 million, which are available to reduce future federal income taxes, if any through 2035.  Atlantic Capital has alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately $329,000 available to reduce future federal regular income taxes, if any, over an indefinite period.

The Company’s income tax returns remain subject to examination by both U.S. federal and state jurisdictions for tax years 20142015 forward.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a net income tax expense for the estimated effects of the Tax Act of $17.4 million, which was primarily due to the remeasurement of the Company’s estimated deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities to reflect the new federal rate of 21%. However, as additional information becomes available and additional analysis is completed, the estimate of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities may change, which could impact the remeasurement of those deferred tax balances. Any adjustment would be recorded to the provision for income taxes in 2018 in the period the amounts are determined.

NOTE 15 - EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Contribution Plan

Atlantic Capital sponsors a 401(k) qualified retirement plan that is qualified pursuant to Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan is referred to as a “safe harbor 401(k) plan.” The plan allows eligible employees to defer a portion of their income by making contributions into the plan on a pretaxpre-tax or post-tax basis. The 401(k) plan has an auto enrollment feature starting with a 1% deferral rate for new participants who meet eligibility requirements. The plan also includes an automatic deferral escalation feature that increases each year up to a maximum participant deferral rate of 5%. The plan provides for a safe harbor matching contribution by Atlantic Capital. If theThe Company electswill make a matching contribution of 100% on participating employee’s deferrals up to make the safe harbor contribution, it will be at least 3%5% of their eligible employees’ compensation that is subject to income tax and paid during the plan year.compensation. Eligible employees are not required to participate in the plan in order to receive the safe harbor matching contribution. The plan also provides that the Board of Directors may authorize matching contributions based on a percentage of the amount contributed by the employee and discretionary profit sharing contributions. Employees of the Company must meet certain requirements concerning minimum age and credited period of service to participate in the plan. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, the Company contributed approximately $1.1 million, $1.1 million, and $1.0 million, $990,000, and $431,000, respectively, to this plan under its safe harbor provision.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

In 2012,

Atlantic Capital initiatedmaintains a long-term incentive plan for certain key employees. Bonuses under the Executive OfficersOfficer Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTI Plan”) may be paid in lump sum in cash or in common stock or in any combination of cash and common stock. Awards are granted under the LTI Plan for a bonus period, which generally means a period of more than one year. Any shares of common stock earned under the LTI Plan are issued under and subject to the terms of the Company’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. Awards are based on individual performance, business unit, division, or divisionsimilar performance or Company-wide performance, or any combination of these performance objectives. Awards granted in 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 cliff vest overare earned, if at all, at the end of a three year period from the date of the awards. Compensation expense for the LTI Plan was $1.5 million, $2.6 million,$765,000,  $879,000, and $1.9$1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, 2016,respectively. Beginning in 2018, the LTI Plan issued performance share awards under the Company’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan. The awards granted in 2019 and 2015, respectively. These2018 are accounted for as equity awards. Previously, in 2017, no performance share awards arewere issued and LTI Plan awards were accounted for as liabilities and remeasured at each reporting date.


101


Stock Incentive Plans

Atlantic Capital sponsors a stock incentive plan for the benefit of directors and employees. Under the Company’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective May 16, 2018) there were approximately 4,525,000 shares reserved for issuance to directors, employees, and employees.independent contractors of Atlantic Capital and its affiliates. The Compensation Committee has the authority to grant the following: an incentive or nonqualified option; a stock appreciation right (including a related SAR or a freestanding SAR); a restricted stock award (including a restricted stock award or a restricted stock unit award); a performance award (including a performance share award or a performance unit award); a phantom stock award; an other stock-based award; a cash bonus award; a dividend equivalent award; or any other award granted under the plan.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, approximately 3,726,0003,345,000 additional awards could be granted under the plan. Through December 31, 2017,2019, incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, performance share awards, and non-restricted stockother stock-based awards have been granted under the plan. Stock options are granted at a price which is no less than the fair market value of a share of Atlantic Capital common stock on the grant date. Stock options generally vest over three years and expire after ten years.

As of December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018, no warrants were outstanding for the purchase of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, and 2015, warrants for 363,000, and 588,000 shares, respectively, were outstanding for the purchase of common stock at a price of $10.00 per warrant. The warrants were issued as of May 14, 2007, the date of issuance of common stock sold in the initial private placement, and were exercisable for a period of ten years following the issuance.

The Company accounts for stock options and warrants in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation, which requires the Company to recognize the costs of its employee stock option awards and warrants in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. According to ASC 718, the total cost of the Company’s share‑based awards is equal to their grant date fair value and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the awards. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized by the Company during 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 20152017 for stock option grants was $169,000,  $242,000, and warrants was $1.1 million, $937,000, and $1.2 million, respectively. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock option grants and warrants at December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016,was $59,000,  $308,000, and 2015 was $646,000, $1.7 million, and $2.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, the weighted average period over which this unrecognized expense is expected to be recognized was 2.60.8 years, 3.41.9 years, and 4.02.6 years, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding at December 31, 2017,2019 was 5.62.4 years.

The Company estimates the fair value of its options and warrants awards using the Black‑Scholes option pricing model. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option and warrant is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. There were no options or warrants awarded during 2016. The table below summarizes the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of options granted/modified during 20172019, 2018, and 2015:2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 

 

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

Risk‑free interest rate

 

2.27

%  

 1.66

%  

1.00-2.42

%  

Expected term in years

 

1.73-1.82

 

 0.25

 

.25-8

 

Expected stock price volatility

 

26.8

%  

 24.2

%  

23.2-25.3

%  

Dividend yield

 

 —

%  

 —

%  

 —

%  

102

  For the year ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Risk‑free interest rate 1.00-2.42% N/A 2.16%
Expected term in years .25-8 N/A 7.73
Expected stock price volatility 23.2-25.3% N/A 40.00%
Dividend yield —% N/A —%



The following table represents stock option and warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015:2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted  Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

Remaining

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 Average

 

Contractual Term

 

 Intrinsic Value 

 

    

Shares

    

Exercise Price

    

(in years)

    

(in thousands)

Outstanding, December 31, 2018

 

 

442,454

 

$

12.02

 

  

 

  

 

Granted/modified(1)

 

 

12,500

 

 

10.00

 

  

 

  

 

Exercised

 

 

(90,330)

 

 

12.76

 

  

 

  

 

Forfeited(1)

 

 

(38,500)

 

 

13.17

 

  

 

 

  

Expired

 

 

(7,144)

 

 

17.79

 

  

 

 

  

Outstanding, December 31, 2019

 

 

318,980

 

$

11.47

 

2.41

 

$

2,203

Exercisable, December 31, 2019

 

 

308,980

 

$

11.36

 

2.30

 

$

2,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted/modified

 

$

8.07

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2017

 

 

757,711

 

$

12.66

 

  

 

 

  

Granted/modified(2)

 

 

15,000

 

 

14.64

 

  

 

 

  

Exercised

 

 

(310,016)

 

 

13.21

 

  

 

 

  

Forfeited(2)

 

 

(19,935)

 

 

14.08

 

  

 

 

  

Expired

 

 

(306)

 

 

105.97

 

  

 

 

  

Outstanding, December 31, 2018

 

 

442,454

 

$

12.02

 

3.98

 

$

1,990

Exercisable, December 31, 2018

 

 

396,454

 

$

11.67

 

3.63

 

$

1,919

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted/modified

 

$

2.79

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2016

 

 

1,485,704

 

$

11.69

 

  

 

 

  

Granted/modified(3)

 

 

229,100

 

 

13.53

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(724,912)

 

 

10.53

 

  

 

 

  

Forfeited(3)

 

 

(231,546)

 

 

13.50

 

  

 

 

  

Expired

 

 

(635)

 

 

126.22

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2017

 

 

757,711

 

$

12.66

 

5.56

 

$

3,883

Exercisable, December 31, 2017

 

 

662,016

 

$

12.39

 

5.24

 

$

3,585

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted/modified

 

$

7.15

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  


 
Options and Warrants Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding, December 31, 2016 1,485,704
 $11.69
    
Granted 229,100
 13.53
    
Exercised (724,912) 10.53
    
Forfeited (231,546) 13.50
    
Expired (635) 126.22
    
Outstanding, December 31, 2017 757,711
 $12.66
 5.56 $3,883
Exercisable, December 31, 2017 662,016
 $12.39
 5.24 $3,585
         
Weighted average fair value of options and warrants granted $7.15
      
         
Outstanding, December 31, 2015 2,369,759
 $11.30
    
Exercised (872,162) 10.04
    
Canceled (4,057) 142.89
    
Forfeited (7,836) 10.76
    
Outstanding, December 31, 2016 1,485,704
 $11.69
 4.33 $11,104
Exercisable, December 31, 2016 1,204,558
 $11.10
 3.38 $9,755
         
Weighted average fair value of options and warrants granted $
      
         
Outstanding, December 31, 2014 1,663,500
 $10.01
    
Options assumed from First Security 482,741
 14.69
    
Granted 245,000
 14.34
    
Exercised (20,707) 10.00
    
Canceled (775) 505.31
    
Outstanding, December 31, 2015 2,369,759
 $11.30
 4.07 $9,258
Exercisable, December 31, 2015 1,925,858
 $10.77
 2.95 $8,662
         
Weighted average fair value of options and warrants granted $7.00
      

(1)

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company modified options for 12,500 shares. The modifications are included as shares granted/modified and as shares forfeited in this table.

Atlantic Capital assumed the stock options issued to First Security employees and directors that were outstanding at the acquisition date. The fair value of these options was included in the total consideration issued to acquire First Security.

(2)

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company modified options for 15,000 shares. The modifications are included as shares granted/modified and as shares forfeited in this table.

(3)

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company modified options for 229,100 shares. The modifications are included as shares granted/modified and as shares forfeited in this table

The total fair value of shares vested during each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, 2016,was $208,000,  $307,000, and 2015, was $1.8 million, $1.2 million,respectively.

103

In 2019 and $688,000, respectively.

2018, the Company granted performance share awards under Atlantic Capital’s 2015 Stock Incentive Plan to members of executive management to evidence awards granted under the LTI Plan. The Company also granted restricted stock awards to certain employees in 2019 and 2018 under the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan. Compensation expense for restricted stock is based on the fair value of restricted stock awards at the time of grant, which is equal to the value of Atlantic Capital’s common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense for performance share awards are based on the fair value of Atlantic Capital’s stock at the grant date adjusted for market conditions, as well as the subsequent achievement of performance conditions over the vesting period. The value of restricted stock awards and performance share awards that are expected to vest is amortized into expense over the vesting period. Restricted stock awards generallymay cliff vest over 1-31‑3 years or vest on a pro-rata basis, generally over 3 years. The market value at the date of award is amortized by charges to compensation expense over the vesting period. Compensation expense related to these awards during 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 20152017 was $1.3 million, $801,000,$1.5 million, and $659,000,$1.3 million, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense associated with restricted stock was $2.6$2.2 million, $2.4$2.5 million, and $1.9$2.6 million as of December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively. At December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, the weighted average period over which this unrecognized expense is to be recognized was 3.02.1 years, 3.22.4 years, and 3.43.0 years, respectively. During 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively, there were 132,487, 109,959,158,593,  139,507, and 150,516132,487 restricted stock and performance share awards granted at a weighted average grant price of $17.83, $14.34,$19.19,  $19.79, and $14.01$17.83. per share.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company modified options for 12,500 shares and 4,719 restricted stock awards to two individuals. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company modified options for 15,000 shares and 6,869 restricted stock awards to two individuals. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company modified options for 229,100 shares and 24,628 restricted stock awards to five individuals. The modifications allowed for the immediate vesting of the awards upon termination of service.retirement. The total incremental cost resulting from the modifications was approximately $31,000,  $111,000 and $709,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

The following table represents restricted stock and performance share award activity for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019, 2018, and 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Grant-

 

    

Shares

    

Date Fair Value

Outstanding, December 31, 2018

 

272,695

 

$

18.09

Granted/modified(1)

 

158,593

 

 

19.19

Vested

 

(70,748)

 

 

16.51

Forfeited(1)

 

(67,663)

 

 

18.34

Outstanding, December 31, 2019

 

292,877

 

$

19.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2017

 

239,468

 

$

15.69

Granted/modified(1)

 

139,507

 

 

19.79

Vested

 

(73,686)

 

 

14.51

Forfeited(1)

 

(32,594)

 

 

15.91

Outstanding, December 31, 2018

 

272,695

 

$

18.09

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2016

 

259,165

 

$

13.70

Granted/modified(1)

 

132,487

 

 

17.83

Vested

 

(91,671)

 

 

13.54

Forfeited(1)

 

(60,513)

 

 

15.03

Outstanding, December 31, 2017

 

239,468

 

$

15.69

(1)

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company modified 4,719, 6,869 and 24,628 restricted stock awards, respectively. The modifications are included as shares granted/modified and as shares forfeited in the table above.


104


The following table represents restricted stock activity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:
 Shares Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2016259,165
 $13.70
Granted132,487
 17.83
Vested(91,671) 13.54
Forfeited(60,513) 15.03
Outstanding, December 31, 2017239,468
 $15.69
    
Outstanding, December 31, 2015217,658
 $13.07
Granted109,959
 14.34
Vested(44,966) 11.92
Forfeited(23,486) 14.23
Outstanding, December 31, 2016259,165
 $13.70
    
Outstanding, December 31, 2014132,093
 $10.84
Granted150,516
 14.01
Vested(54,978) 10.53
Forfeited(9,973) 11.80
Outstanding, December 31, 2015217,658
 $13.07

NOTE 16 – DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

Risk Management

Atlantic Capital’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to net interest revenue and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, Atlantic Capital primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy.

Cash Flow Hedges

At December 31, 2017,2019, Atlantic Capital’s interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the payment of floating-rate amounts to a counterparty in exchange for receiving fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, Atlantic Capital had interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional amountamounts of $175.0 million and $100.0 million, and $50.0 million, respectively.

No hedge ineffectiveness gains or losses were recognized on active cash flow hedges in 20172019 or 2016.2018. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Atlantic Capital expects that approximately $159,000$271,000 will be reclassified as an increasea decrease to loan interest income over the next twelve months related to these cash flow hedges.

Customer Swaps

Atlantic Capital also enters into derivative contracts, which consist of interest rate swaps, to facilitate the needs of clients desiring to manage interest rate risk. These swaps are not designated as accounting hedges under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. In order to economically hedge the interest rate risk associated with offering this product, Atlantic Capital simultaneously enters into derivative contracts with third parties to offset the customer contracts, such that Atlantic Capital minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. The derivative contracts are structured such that the notional amounts reduce over time to generally match the expected amortization of the underlying loans. These derivatives are not speculative and arise from a service provided to clients.

Atlantic Capital’s derivative instruments are recorded at fair value in other assets and accrued interest receivable and other liabilities and accrued interest payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are



recognized in other noninterestderivatives income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, Atlantic Capital had interest rate swaps related to this program with an aggregate notional amount of $142.3$89.5 million and $140.7$109.5 million, respectively.

Atlantic Capital acquired a loan level hedging program, which First Security utilized to accommodate clients preferring a fixed rate loan. The loan documents include an addendum with a zero premium collar. The zero premium collar is a cap and a floor at the same interest rate, resulting in a fixed rate to the borrower. To hedge this embedded option, the Bank entersFirst Security entered into a dealer facing trade exactly mirroring the terms in the loan addendum.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, Atlantic Capital had interest rate swaps related to this program with an aggregate notional amount of $149.1 million and $166.8 million, respectively.

Counterparty Credit Risk

As a result of its derivative contracts, Atlantic Capital is exposed to credit risk. Specifically approved counterparties and exposure limits are defined. On a quarterly basis, the customer derivative contracts and related counterparties are evaluated for credit risk and an adjustment is made to the contract’s fair value. This adjustment is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Most derivative contracts with clients are secured by collateral. Additionally, in

105

In accordance with the interest rate agreements with derivatives dealers, Atlantic Capital may be required to post margin to these counterparties. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, Atlantic Capital had minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and posted collateral of $8.8$13.6. million and $16.3$5.1 million, respectively, against its obligations under these agreements. Cash collateral related to derivative contracts is recorded in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Atlantic Capital has master netting agreements with the derivatives dealers with which it does business, but reflects gross assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In conjunction with the FASB’s fair value measurement guidance, management made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting arrangements on a net basis.

Atlantic Capital has master netting agreements with the derivatives dealers with which it does business, but reflects gross assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

To accommodate clients, Atlantic Capital occasionally enters into credit risk participation agreements with counterparty banks to accept a portion of the credit risk related to interest rate swaps. This allows clients to execute an interest rate swap with one bank while allowing for distribution of the credit risk among participating members. Credit risk participation agreements arise when Atlantic Capital contracts with other financial institutions, as a guarantor, to share credit risk associated with certain interest rate swaps. These agreements provide for reimbursement of losses resulting from a third party default on the underlying swap. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, Atlantic Capital had credit risk participation agreements with a notional amount of $14.8$7.7 million and $4.5$9.5 million, respectively.




The following table reflects the estimated fair value positions of derivative contracts and credit risk participation agreements as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

    

 Balance Sheet

    

Notional

    

 

 

    

Notional

    

 

 

Interest Rate Products

 

Location

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

Cash flow hedge of LIBOR based loans

 

Other assets

 

$

125,000

 

$

3,578

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow hedge of LIBOR based loans

 

Other liabilities

 

$

50,000

 

$

 8

 

$

100,000

 

$

2,029

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

 

Balance Sheet

 

Notional

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

Interest Rate Products

    

Location

    

Amount

    

Fair Value

    

Amount

    

Fair Value

Customer swap positions

 

Other assets

 

$

44,763

 

$

1,025

 

$

54,760

 

$

756

Zero premium collar

 

Other assets

 

 

74,562

 

 

4,253

 

 

83,385

 

 

1,205

 

 

 

 

$

119,325

 

$

5,278

 

$

138,145

 

$

1,961

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dealer offsets to customer swap positions

 

Other liabilities

 

$

44,763

 

$

1,090

 

$

54,760

 

$

770

Dealer offset to zero premium collar

 

Other liabilities

 

 

74,562

 

 

4,545

 

 

83,385

 

 

1,226

Credit risk participation

 

Other liabilities

 

 

7,657

 

 

 4

 

 

9,532

 

 

 2

 

 

 

 

$

126,982

 

$

5,639

 

$

147,677

 

$

1,998

106

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815    
           
(in thousands)   December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Interest Rate Products Balance Sheet Location Notional Amount Fair Value Notional Amount Fair Value
Cash flow hedge of LIBOR based loans  Other assets $
 $
 $50,000
 $186
           
Cash flow hedge of LIBOR based loans  Other liabilities $100,000
 $887
 $
 $
           
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815    
           
    December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Interest Rate Products Balance Sheet Location Notional Amount Fair Value Notional Amount Fair Value
Customer swap positions  Other assets $71,160
 $946
 $70,352
 $1,364
Zero premium collar  Other assets 94,953
 2,072
 98,697
 2,760
    $166,113
 $3,018
 $169,049
 $4,124
           
Dealer offsets to customer swap positions  Other liabilities $71,160
 $975
 $70,352
 $1,371
Credit risk participation  Other liabilities 14,807
 4
 4,460
 
Dealer offset to zero premium collar  Other liabilities 94,953
 2,157
 98,697
 2,760
    $180,920
 $3,136
 $173,509
 $4,131

The following table presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Location of Gain or

 

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

 

 

(Loss) Recognized in

 

Recognized in Income on Derivative

(in thousands)

    

Income on Derivative

    

Year Ended December 31, 

 

 

 

    

2019

    

2018

Interest rate products

 

Other income / (expense)

 

$

(321)

 

$

79

Other contracts

 

Other income / (expense)

 

 

(1)

 

 

 2

Total

 

 

 

$

(322)

 

$

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fee income

 

Other income / (expense)

 

$

 

$

227

The following table reflects the impact to the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to derivative contracts for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized in OCI on Derivatives

 

Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI in Income

 

 

(Effective Portion)

 

(Effective Portion)

(in thousands)

 

2019

    

2018

    

Location

    

2019

    

2018

Interest rate swaps

 

$

4,487

 

$

(1,229)

 

Interest income

 

$

(356)

 

$

26

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships    
  Years ended December 31,
(in thousands)  Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion)  Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI in Income (Effective Portion)
  2017 2016 Location 2017 2016
Interest rate swaps $(688) $311
 Interest income $499
 $712



NOTE 17 – REGULATORY MATTERS


The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. On January 1, 2015, the Company became subject to Basel III rules, which include transition provisions through January 1, 2019. Under Basel III, total capital consistconsists of two tiers of capital, Tier 1 and Tier 2. Tier 1 capital is further composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and additional Tier 1 capital.

The transition provisions include important differences in determining the composition of regulatory capital between the Basel I rules and Basel III rules including, changes in capital deductions related to the Company’s deferred tax assets, and the inclusion of unrealized gains and losses on AFS debt and certain marketable equity securities recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). These changes are impacted by, among other things, future changes in interest rates, overall earnings performance and company actions. Changes to the composition of regulatory capital under Basel III, as compared to the Basel I rules, are recognized in 20% annual increments, and will bewere fully recognized as of January 1, 2019. When presented on a fully phased-in basis, capital, risk-weighted assets and the capital ratios assume all regulatory capital adjustments and deductions are fully recognized.

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital primarily includes qualifying common shareholders’ equity, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and certain minority interests. Goodwill, disallowed intangible assets and certain disallowed deferred tax assets are excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital.

Additional Tier 1 capital primarily includes qualifying non-cumulative preferred stock, trust preferred securities subject to phase-out and certain minority interests. Certain deferred tax assets are also excluded.

107

Tier 2 capital primarily consists of qualifying subordinated debt, a limited portion of the allowance for loan and lease losses, trust preferred securities subject to phase-out and reserves for unfunded lending commitments. The Company’s total capital is the sum of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital.

To meet adequately capitalized regulatory requirements, an institution must maintain a Common Equity Tier 1 Capital of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, and a Total capital ratio of 8.0%. A “well-capitalized” institution must generally maintain capital ratios 200 basis points higher than the minimum guidelines. The risk-based capital rules have been further supplemented by a Tier 1 leverage ratio, defined as Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average total assets, after certain adjustments. The Bank must maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0% to be classified as “well capitalized.” Failure to meet the capital requirements established by the joint agencies can lead to certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Basel III rules also introduced a capital conservation buffer which will beis fully phased in over four years beginning on January 1, 2016, with a maximum buffer of 0.625%and is 2.5% of risk-weighted assets for 2016, 1.25% for 2017, 1.875% for 2018, and 2.5% for 2019 and thereafter. Failure to maintain the required capital conservation buffer will result in limitations on capital distributions and on discretionary bonuses to executive officers.

The Basel III rules were implemented in the first quarter of 2015. The Company opted out of the AOCI treatment under the newthese requirements and, as such, unrealized security gains and losses will continue to be excluded from bank regulatory capital.

As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Bank was categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. Management believes there are no conditions or events since the previous notification that have changed the institution’s categorizations.


108


The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the table below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be Well Capitalized Under

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For Capital Adequacy

 

Prompt Corrective Action

 

 

 

Actual

 

Purposes

 

Provisions

 

(dollars in thousands)

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

285,456

 

12.0

%  

$

106,740

 

4.5

%  

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

 

327,426

 

13.8

%  

 

106,698

 

4.5

%  

154,119

 

6.5

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

285,456

 

12.0

%  

$

189,760

 

8.0

%  

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

 

327,426

 

13.8

%  

 

189,685

 

8.0

%  

237,107

 

10.0

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital (to risk weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

354,757

 

15.0

%  

$

142,320

 

6.0

%  

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

 

346,854

 

14.6

%  

 

142,264

 

6.0

%  

189,685

 

8.0

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital (to average assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

285,456

 

11.0

%  

$

103,596

 

4.0

%  

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

 

327,426

 

12.7

%  

 

103,425

 

4.0

%  

129,281

 

5.0

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be Well Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For Capital Adequacy

 

Under Prompt Corrective

 

 

 

Actual

 

Purposes

 

Action Provisions

 

 

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Amount

    

Ratio

 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

285,250

 

11.5

%  

$

112,033

 

4.5

%  

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

 

304,907

 

12.3

%  

 

112,022

 

4.5

%  

161,809

 

6.5

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

285,250

 

11.5

%  

$

149,378

 

6.0

%  

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

 

304,907

 

12.3

%  

 

149,362

 

6.0

%  

199,150

 

8.0

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital (to risk weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

353,458

 

14.2

%  

$

199,170

 

8.0

%  

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

 

323,411

 

13.0

%  

 

199,150

 

8.0

%  

248,937

 

10.0

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital (to average assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

285,250

 

10.0

%  

$

113,705

 

4.0

%  

N/A

 

N/A

 

Bank

 

 

304,907

 

10.6

%  

 

114,574

 

4.0

%  

143,218

 

5.0

%  

  As of December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands) Actual For Capital Adequacy Purposes To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Common Equity Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets): AmountRatio AmountRatio AmountRatio
Consolidated $259,865
11.2% $104,876
4.5%  N/A
N/A
Bank 295,629
12.7% 104,858
4.5% 151,461
6.5%
          
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets):         
Consolidated $259,865
11.2% $139,834
6.0%  N/A
N/A
Bank 295,629
12.7% 139,810
6.0% 186,414
8.0%
          
Total capital (to risk weighted assets):         
Consolidated $329,641
14.1% $186,446
8.0% N/A
N/A
Bank 315,870
13.6% 186,414
8.0% 233,017
10.0%
          
Tier 1 capital (to average assets):         
Consolidated $259,865
9.7% $106,706
4.0%  N/A
N/A
Bank 295,629
11.1% 107,009
4.0% 133,761
5.0%
          
  As of December 31, 2016
  Actual For Capital Adequacy Purposes To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Common Equity Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets): AmountRatio AmountRatio AmountRatio
Consolidated $241,313
10.3% $105,463
4.5% N/A
N/A
Bank 276,778
11.8% 105,497
4.5% 152,385
6.5%
          
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets):         
Consolidated $241,313
10.3% $140,617
6.0% N/A
N/A
Bank 276,778
11.8% 140,663
6.0% 187,551
8.0%
          
Total capital (to risk weighted assets):         
Consolidated $311,954
13.3% $187,490
8.0% N/A
N/A
Bank 298,053
12.7% 187,551
8.0% 234,439
10.0%
          
Tier 1 capital (to average assets):         
Consolidated $241,313
9.1% $106,179
4.0% N/A
N/A
Bank 276,778
10.4% 106,179
4.0% 132,724
5.0%



NOTE 18 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


Atlantic Capital follows the guidance pursuant to ASC No. 820-10,820‑10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This issuance applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances. Atlantic Capital measures its investment securities and interest rate derivative assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis either when assets are evaluated for impairment or for disclosure purposes. Atlantic Capital measures its servicing assets, goodwill, intangible assets, loans held for sale, impaired loans and other real estate owned at fair value on a nonrecurring basis if necessary.

The guidance emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement and defines fair value as the price that could be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, this guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

109

Atlantic Capital applied the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 – Assets or liabilities for which the identical item is traded on an active exchange, such as publicly-traded instruments or futures contracts.

Level 2 – Assets or liabilities valued based on observable market data for similar instruments.

Level 3 – Assets or liabilities for which significant valuation assumptions are not readily observable in the market, instruments valued based on the best available data, some of which is internally-developed, and risk premiums that a market participant would require.

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 or Level 2 and Level 3 during 2017. There was one transfer between Level 2 and Level 3 and no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2016.

2019 or 2018.

Atlantic Capital records investment securities available-for-sale at fair value on a recurring basis. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, Atlantic Capital obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. In estimating the fair values for investment securities, Atlantic Capital believes that independent third-party market prices are the best evidence of an exit price. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the Treasury Department yield curve, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the securities’ terms and conditions, among other things.

Derivative instruments are primarily transacted as over-the-counter trades and priced with observable market assumptions. Ongoing measurements include observable market assumptions with appropriate valuation adjustments for liquidity and for credit risk of counterparties and Atlantic Capital’s own credit. For these instruments, Atlantic Capital obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider factors such as the likelihood of default by Atlantic Capital and its counterparties, total exposure and remaining maturities in determining the appropriate fair value adjustments to record. Generally, the expected loss of each client counterparty is estimated using Atlantic Capital’s internal risk rating system. For financial institution counterparties that are rated by national rating agencies, those ratings are used in determining the credit risk. This approach used to estimate exposures to counterparties is also used by Atlantic Capital to estimate its own credit risk on derivative liability positions.


110


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis


The following tables present assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using:

 

    

Quoted Prices

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

Securities

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

 

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Securities available-for-sale—

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

U.S. states and political subdivisions

 

$

 —

 

$

82,485

 

$

 —

 

$

82,485

Trust preferred securities

 

 

 —

 

 

4,688

 

 

 —

 

 

4,688

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 —

 

 

19,920

 

 

 —

 

 

19,920

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 —

 

 

175,368

 

 

 —

 

 

175,368

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

 —

 

$

282,461

 

$

 —

 

$

282,461

Interest rate derivative assets

 

$

 —

 

$

8,856

 

$

 —

 

$

8,856

Interest rate derivative liabilities

 

$

 —

 

$

5,647

 

$

 —

 

$

5,647


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018 Using:

 

    

Quoted Prices

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

Securities

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

 

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Totals

 

 

(in thousands)

Securities available-for-sale—

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

U.S. government agencies

 

$

 —

 

$

26,849

 

$

 —

 

$

26,849

U.S. states and political subdivisions

 

 

 —

 

 

84,834

 

 

 —

 

 

84,834

Trust preferred securities

 

 

 —

 

 

4,400

 

 

 —

 

 

4,400

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 —

 

 

12,363

 

 

 —

 

 

12,363

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 —

 

 

274,040

 

 

 —

 

 

274,040

Total securities available-for-sale

 

$

 —

 

$

402,486

 

$

 —

 

$

402,486

Interest rate derivative assets

 

$

 —

 

$

1,961

 

$

 —

 

$

1,961

Interest rate derivative liabilities

 

$

 —

 

$

4,027

 

$

 —

 

$

4,027

 2017 Fair Value Measurement Using
 Quoted Prices in Active markets for Identical Securities (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total
 (in thousands)
Securities available-for-sale—       
U.S. government agencies$
 $34,111
 $
 $34,111
U.S. states and political subdivisions
 90,001
 
 90,001
Trust preferred securities
 4,650
 
 4,650
Corporate debt securities
 12,622
 
 12,622
Mortgage-backed securities
 307,733
 
 307,733
Total securities available-for-sale$
 $449,117
 $
 $449,117
Interest rate derivative assets$
 $3,018
 $
 $3,018
Interest rate derivative liabilities$
 $4,023
 $
 $4,023

 2016 Fair Value Measurement Using
 Quoted Prices in Active markets for Identical Securities (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Totals
 (in thousands)
Securities available-for-sale—       
U.S. government agencies$
 $21,152
 $
 $21,152
U.S. states and political subdivisions
 90,172
 
 90,172
Trust preferred securities
 4,525
 
 4,525
Corporate debt securities
 19,231
 
 19,231
Mortgage-backed securities
 212,625
 
 212,625
Total securities available-for-sale$
 $347,705
 $
 $347,705
Interest rate derivative assets$
 $4,310
 $
 $4,310
Interest rate derivative liabilities$
 $4,131
 $
 $4,131
The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs that are classified as Level 3 values.

  Securities Available-for-Sale
  (in thousands)
December 31, 2015 $2,414
Change due to presence of observable market data (2,414)
December 31, 2016 $

For Level 3 securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators.

Atlantic Capital had no Level 3 securities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

For the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, there was not a change in the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value.


111


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis


The following table presents the assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Fair Value

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Measurement

 

Measurement

 

Measurement

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Impaired Loans

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,288

 

$

4,288

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Fair Value

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

Measurement

 

Measurement

 

Measurement

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

Impaired Loans

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

1,836

 

$

1,836

December 31, 2017 
Level 1
Fair Value
Measurement
 
Level 2
Fair Value
Measurement
 
Level 3
Fair Value
Measurement
 Total
 (in thousands)
Impaired Loans $
 $
 $2,199
 $2,199


December 31, 2016 
Level 1
Fair Value
Measurement
 
Level 2
Fair Value
Measurement
 
Level 3
Fair Value
Measurement
 Total
 (in thousands)
Impaired Loans $
 $
 $7,248
 $7,248

Level 3 loans consist of impaired loans which have been partially charged-off or have specific valuation allowances. The fair value of Level 3 assets is estimated based on the underlying collateral value. For loans which the cash proceeds from the sale of the underlying collateral is the expected source of repayment, the fair value of these loans was derived from internal estimates of the underlying collateral incorporating market data, including third party appraisals or evaluations, when available. Appraised values may be discounted based on management’s assessment of the level of inactivity in the real estate market and other markets for the underlying collateral, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and other information that in management’s judgment may affect the value. Impaired loans are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis and adjusted accordingly.

Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value

FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair value information about

For financial instruments whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. Wherehave quoted market prices, those quotes are notused to determine fair value. Financial instruments that have no defined maturity, have a remaining maturity of 180 days or less, or reprice frequently to a market rate, are assumed to have a fair value that approximates the reported book value, after taking into consideration any applicable credit risk. If no market quotes are available, financial instruments are valued by discounting the expected cash flows using an estimated current market interest rate for the financial instrument. For loans held for investment, fair values are basedvalue is measured using the exit price notion. For off-balance sheet derivative instruments, fair value is estimated as the amount that Atlantic Capital would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date, taking into account the current unrealized gains or losses on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows.

open contracts.

The following disclosure should not be considered a surrogate of the liquidation valueshort maturity of Atlantic Capital or the Bank, but ratherCapital’s assets and liabilities results in having a good-faith estimate of the increase or decrease in valuesignificant number of financial instruments held by Atlantic Capital since purchase, originationwhose fair value equals or issuance.

Theclosely approximates carrying value. Such financial instruments are reported in the following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair values disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Forbalance sheet captions: cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, commercial paper, federal funds soldother short-term investments, and reverse repurchase agreements the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale. Fair values for investment securities available-for-sale are based on quoted market prices.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. The Federal Home Loan Bank has historically repurchased their stock at cost. Therefore, the carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of its fair value.
Loans Held for Investment, Net.FHLB stock. The fair value of fixed rate loanssecurities equals quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated by discountingused quoted market prices for similar securities or dealer quotes. Due to the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratingsshort-term settlement of accrued interest receivable and adjusted for a market liquidity discount. For variable rate loanspayable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate ofclosely approximates fair value, adjusted for a market liquidity discount. Estimating the fair value of the loan portfolio when loan sales and trading markets are illiquid requires significant judgment. Therefore, the estimated fair value can vary significantly depending on a market participant’s ultimate considerations and assumptions.
The Company uses assumptions that are expected to approximate those that a market participant purchasing the loans would use to value the loans in the current environment. The final value yields a market participant’s expected return on investment that is indicative of the current market conditions, but it does not take into consideration the Company’s estimated value from continuing to hold these loans or its lack of willingness to transact at these estimated values.
Loans Held for Sale and Deposits to be Assumed in Branch Sale. Loans held for sale and deposits to be assumed in branch sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics.


Derivative Financial Instruments. The estimated fair value of the interest rate swaps and credit risk participations are based on cash flow models supported by market data inputs.
Deposits. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. The fair value of the FHLB fixed rate borrowing is estimated using discounted cash flows, based on the current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. For variable rate FHLB borrowings the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Subordinated Debt. The fair value of subordinated debt is estimated using discounted cash flows, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Off–Balance Sheet Financial Instruments. Because commitments to extend credit and letters of credit are generally short-term and at variable rates, the contract value and estimated fair value associated with these instruments are immaterial.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect anythe premium or discount on any particular financial instrument that could result from offering forthe sale at one timeof Atlantic Capital’s entire holdingsholdings. Because no ready market exists for a significant portion of a particularAtlantic Capital’s financial instrument.

Fairinstruments, fair value estimates are based on existing onmany judgments. These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and off-balancematters of significant judgment, and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting(commitments to estimateextend credit and standby letters of credit) are generally short-term and at variable rates. Therefore, both the value of anticipated future businesscarrying amount and the estimated fair value associated with these instruments are immaterial.

112

The following table presentstables present the estimated fair values of Atlantic Capital’s financial instruments at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016.2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at

 

 

December 31, 2019 Using:

 

    

 

 

    

Quoted Prices

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

markets for

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

Carrying

 

Securities

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

Amount

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

 (Level 3)

 

 

(in thousands)

Financial assets:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Cash and due from banks

 

$

45,249

 

$

45,249

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

 

 

421,079

 

 

421,079

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total securities available-for-sale

 

 

282,461

 

 

 —

 

 

282,461

 

 

 —

Total securities held-to-maturity

 

 

116,972

 

 

 —

 

 

115,291

 

 

 —

FHLB stock

 

 

2,680

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,680

Federal Reserve Bank stock

 

 

9,998

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,998

Loans held for investment, net

 

 

1,873,524

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,890,258

Loans held for sale

 

 

370

 

 

 —

 

 

370

 

 

 —

Derivative assets

 

 

8,856

 

 

 —

 

 

8,856

 

 

 —

Financial liabilities:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Deposits

 

$

2,499,046

 

$

 —

 

$

2,421,957

 

$

 —

Subordinated debt

 

 

49,873

 

 

 —

 

 

50,081

 

 

 —

Derivative financial instruments

 

 

5,647

 

 

 —

 

 

5,647

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at

 

 

December 31, 2018 Using:

 

    

 

 

    

Quoted Prices

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

markets for

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

Carrying

 

Securities

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

Amount

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

 

(in thousands)

Financial assets:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Cash and due from banks

 

$

42,895

 

$

42,895

 

$

 

$

 —

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

 

 

216,040

 

 

216,040

 

 

 

 

 —

Other short-term investments

 

 

9,457

 

 

9,457

 

 

 

 

 —

Total securities available-for-sale

 

 

402,486

 

 

 

 

402,486

 

 

 —

FHLB stock

 

 

2,622

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,622

Federal Reserve Bank stock

 

 

9,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,906

Loans held for investment, net

 

 

1,710,222

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,740,438

Loans held for sale

 

 

5,889

 

 

 

 

5,889

 

 

 —

Loans held for sale - discontinued operations

 

 

373,030

 

 

 

 

373,030

 

 

 —

Derivative assets

 

 

1,961

 

 

 

 

1,961

 

 

 —

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Deposits

 

$

1,952,514

 

$

 

$

1,830,673

 

$

 —

Deposits to be assumed - discontinued operations

 

 

585,429

 

 

 

 

585,429

 

 

 —

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - discontinued operations

 

 

6,220

 

 

6,220

 

 

 

 

 —

Subordinated debt

 

 

49,704

 

 

 

 

48,960

 

 

 —

Derivative financial instruments

 

 

4,027

 

 

 

 

4,027

 

 

 —

In accordance with the adoption of ASU 2016‑01 in 2018, the methods used to measure the fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2019 represent an approximation of exit price, however, an actual exit price may differ.

113

 Fair Value Measurements at
 December 31, 2017 Using:
 Carrying Amount Quoted Prices in Active markets for Identical Securities (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 (in thousands)
Financial assets:       
Cash and due from banks$38,086
 $38,086
 $
 $
Interest-bearing deposits in banks281,247
 281,247
 
 
Other short-term investments10,681
 10,681
 
 
Total securities available-for-sale449,117
 
 449,117
 
FHLB stock4,388
 
 
 4,388
Federal Reserve Bank stock9,792
 
 
 9,792
Loans held for investment, net1,914,495
 
 
 1,955,705
Loans held for sale1,487
 
 1,487
 
Derivative assets3,018
 
 3,018
 
Financial liabilities:       
Deposits$2,450,665
 $
 $2,411,810
 $
Subordinated debt49,535
 
 49,888
 
FHLB advances45,000
 
 45,057
 
Derivative financial instruments4,023
 
 4,023
 


 Fair Value Measurements at
 December 31, 2016 Using:
 Carrying Amount Quoted Prices in Active markets for Identical Securities (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 (in thousands)
Financial assets:       
Cash and due from banks$36,790
 $36,790
 $
 $
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks118,039
 118,039
 
 
Other short-term investments10,896
 10,896
 
 
Total securities available-for-sale347,705
 
 347,705
 
FHLB stock7,067
 
 
 7,067
Federal Reserve Bank stock9,690
 
 
 9,690
Loans held for investment, net1,960,735
 
 
 1,939,895
Loans held for sale35,219
 
 35,219
 
Derivative assets4,310
 
 4,310
 
Financial liabilities:       
Deposits$2,205,991
 $
 $2,144,196
 $
Deposits to be assumed in branch sale31,589
 
 31,589
 
Subordinated debt49,366
 
 48,971
 
FHLB advances110,000
 
 109,946
 
Derivative financial instruments4,131
 
 4,131
 


NOTE 19 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Atlantic Capital is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit, most of which are standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The contract amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement Atlantic Capital has in particular classes of financial instruments.

Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by Atlantic Capital to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. Most letters of credit expire in less than one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

Atlantic Capital’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Atlantic Capital uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

Atlantic Capital’s maximum exposure to credit risk for unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit as well as a summary of minimum lease payments at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016 was2018 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

 

 

(in thousands)

Financial Instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commitments to extend credit

 

$

735,905

 

$

715,591

Standby letters of credit

 

 

8,053

 

 

15,650

 

 

$

743,958

 

$

731,241

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum lease payments

 

$

20,055

 

$

22,014

 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 
 (in thousands)
Financial Instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk:   
Commitments to extend credit$689,753
 $617,432
 
Standby letters of credit10,958
 16,625
 
 $700,711
 $634,057
 
     
Minimum lease payments$18,894

$8,630
 



The Company also had commitments related to investment in SBICs totaling $2.4 million and $3.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Atlantic Capital, in the normal course of business, is subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, or the range of any possible loss, management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the ultimate aggregate liability, if any, arising from these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on Atlantic Capital’s financial position or results of operations.


NOTE 20 – REVENUE RECOGNITION

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU No. 2014‑09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 606. As stated in Note 2, Accounting Standards Updates and Recently Adopted Standards, the implementation of the new standard did not result in any significant changes to the Company’s methodology of recognizing revenue; as such, the Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to first quarter 2018 opening retained earnings in an amount of approximately $1,000. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the Company’s historic accounting under Topic 605.

114

Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities. In addition, certain noninterest income streams such as fees associated with financial guarantees and derivatives are also not in scope of the new guidance. Topic 606 is applicable to noninterest revenue streams such as service charges on deposit accounts and trust and asset management income. However, the recognition of these revenue streams did not change significantly upon adoption of Topic 606. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is generated from contracts with customers. Noninterest revenue streams within the scope of Topic 606 are discussed below.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts

Service charges represent general service fees for monthly account maintenance and activity, or transaction-based fees and consist of transaction-based revenue, time-based revenue (service period), item-based revenue or some other individual attribute-based revenue. Revenue is recognized when the performance obligation is completed which is generally monthly for account maintenance services or when a transaction has been completed, such as a wire transfer or ATM withdrawal. Payment for such performance obligations are generally received at the time the performance obligations are satisfied. The following table presents service charges by type of service provided for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

 

 

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

Deposit account analysis fees and charges

 

$

2,630

 

$

2,166

 

$

1,785

ATM fees

 

 

58

 

 

223

 

 

234

NSF fees

 

 

57

 

 

97

 

 

74

Wire fees

 

 

483

 

 

426

 

 

356

Foreign exchange fees

 

 

352

 

 

288

 

 

258

Other

 

 

 7

 

 

15

 

 

27

Total service charges - continuing operations

 

 

3,587

 

 

3,215

 

 

2,734

Service charges - discontinued operations

 

 

527

 

 

1,922

 

 

2,342

Total service charges

 

$

4,114

 

$

5,137

 

$

5,076

Trust and Asset Management

Trust and asset management income is primarily comprised of fees earned from the management and administration of trusts and other customer assets. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied over time and the resulting fees are recognized monthly, based upon the month-end market value of the assets under management and the applicable fee rate. Payment is generally received a few days after month end through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. The Company’s performance obligation for these transactional-based services is generally satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time (i.e., as incurred). Payment is received shortly after services are rendered. During the second quarter of 2018, Atlantic Capital sold its trust business. The following table presents trust income by type of service provided for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

    

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

Personal trust and agency accounts

$

615

 

$

1,012

Employee benefit and retirement-related trust and agency accounts

 

120

 

 

225

Investment management and investment advisory agency accounts

 

216

 

 

355

Custody and safekeeping accounts

 

26

 

 

68

Other

 

48

 

 

154

 

$

1,025

 

$

1,814

115

Other

Other noninterest income consists of other recurring revenue streams such as check printing income, safety deposit box rental fees, and other miscellaneous revenue streams. Check printing income is recognized ratably over the contract period as the Company satisfies its performance obligation to sell a specific number of check packages. Safe deposit box rental fees are charged to the customer annually and recognized upon receipt of payment. The Company determined that since rentals and renewals occur fairly consistently over time, revenue is recognized on a basis consistent with the duration of the performance obligation.

Contract Balances

A contract asset balance occurs when an entity performs a service for a customer before the customer pays consideration (resulting in a contract receivable) or before payment is due (resulting in a contract asset). A contract liability balance is an entity’s obligation to transfer a service to a customer for which the entity has already received payment (or payment is due) from the customer. The Company’s noninterest revenue streams are largely based on transactional activity, or standard month-end revenue accruals such as asset management fees based on month-end market values. Consideration is often received immediately or shortly after the Company satisfies its performance obligation and revenue is recognized. The Company does not typically enter into long-term revenue contracts with customers, and therefore, does not experience significant contract balances. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company did not have any significant contract balances.

NOTE 21 – ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY) FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Balance Sheets

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

    

2019

    

2018

Assets

 

 

  

 

 

  

Cash

 

$

7,752

 

$

30,568

Investment in subsidiary

 

 

368,465

 

 

343,311

Other assets

 

 

938

 

 

260

Total assets

 

$

377,155

 

$

374,139

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

 

  

 

 

  

Long-term debt

 

$

49,873

 

$

49,704

Other liabilities

 

 

787

 

 

782

Total liabilities

 

 

50,660

 

 

50,486

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common stock

 

 

230,265

 

 

291,771

Retained earnings

 

 

91,669

 

 

42,187

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

4,561

 

 

(10,305)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

 

326,495

 

 

323,653

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

377,155

 

$

374,139

116

Balance Sheets    
(in thousands)    
  December 31,
  2017 2016
Assets    
Cash $14,151
 $15,731
Investment in subsidiary 344,188
 339,124
Other assets 403
 305
Total assets $358,742
 $355,160
     
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity    
Long-term debt $49,535
 $49,366
Other liabilities 782
 2,136
Total liabilities 50,317
 51,502
     
Shareholders’ equity:    
    Common stock 299,474
 292,747
    Retained earnings 12,810
 16,536
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (3,859) (5,625)
Total shareholders’ equity 308,425
 303,658
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $358,742
 $355,160



NOTE 20 – ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY) FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Statements of Operations      
(in thousands)      
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Income:      
  Interest income $197
 $98
 $46
Total income 197
 98
 46
       
Expense:      
  Interest on long-term debt 3,294
 3,282
 858
  Professional fees 
 
 1,582
  Other expense 1,113
 322
 615
Total expense 4,407
 3,604
 3,055
       
Loss before income tax expense and equity in undistributed (losses) earnings from subsidiary (4,210) (3,506) (3,009)
       
Income tax benefit (1,681) (849) (1,126)
Loss before equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiary (2,529) (2,657) (1,883)
Equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiary (1,197) 16,052
 564
Net (loss) income $(3,726) $13,395
 $(1,319)

Statements of Operations

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Income:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Interest income

 

$

 —

 

$

381

 

$

197

Total income

 

 

 —

 

 

381

 

 

197

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Interest on long-term debt

 

 

3,294

 

 

3,304

 

 

3,294

Other expense

 

 

1,231

 

 

1,134

 

 

1,113

Total expense

 

 

4,525

 

 

4,438

 

 

4,407

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss before income tax expense and equity in undistributed (losses) earnings from subsidiary

 

 

(4,525)

 

 

(4,057)

 

 

(4,210)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

(1,217)

 

 

(1,091)

 

 

(1,681)

Loss before equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiary

 

 

(3,308)

 

 

(2,966)

 

 

(2,529)

Equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiary

 

 

53,163

 

 

31,498

 

 

(1,197)

Net income (loss)

 

$

49,855

 

$

28,532

 

$

(3,726)

Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Operating activities

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net (loss) income

 

$

49,855

 

$

28,532

 

$

(3,726)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary

 

 

(53,163)

 

 

(31,498)

 

 

1,197

Decrease (increase) in other assets

 

 

(1,521)

 

 

(705)

 

 

(1,264)

(Decrease) increase in other liabilities

 

 

173

 

 

169

 

 

(1,354)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

(4,656)

 

 

(3,502)

 

 

(5,147)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing activities

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing activities

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

1,154

 

 

4,096

 

 

3,567

Cash dividends received

 

 

45,500

 

 

30,000

 

 

 —

Repurchase of common stock

 

 

(64,814)

 

 

(14,177)

 

 

 —

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

(18,160)

 

 

19,919

 

 

3,567

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(22,816)

 

 

16,417

 

 

(1,580)

Cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

 

30,568

 

 

14,151

 

 

15,731

Cash equivalents, end of year

 

$

7,752

 

$

30,568

 

$

14,151
























NOTE 20 – ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC. (PARENT COMPANY ONLY) FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Statements of Cash Flows      
(in thousands)      
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Operating activities      
Net (loss) income $(3,726) $13,395
 $(1,319)
       
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:      
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary 1,197
 (16,052) (564)
Decrease (increase) in other assets (1,264) 1,928
 (433)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities (1,354) 2,100
 (19)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (5,147) 1,371
 (2,335)
       
Investing activities      
Advances to subsidiaries 
 
 (16,000)
Cash consideration paid for acquisition 
 
 (47,098)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities 
 
 (63,098)
       
Financing activities      
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 
 
 50,000
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock 
 
 24,004
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 3,567
 3,947
 
Acquisition of treasury stock 
 
 (707)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 3,567
 3,947
 73,297
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (1,580) 5,318
 7,864
Cash equivalents, beginning of year 15,731
 10,413
 2,549
Cash equivalents, end of year $14,151
 $15,731
 $10,413

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

117

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017.2019. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.



Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017,2019, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation, integrity, accuracy, and fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.  The financial statements were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and include amounts based on judgments and estimates by management.

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f)13a‑15(f) and 15d-15(f)15d‑15(f) under the Exchange Act.  The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP.  Our internal control over financial reporting is supported by internal audits, appropriate reviews by management, policies and guidelines, careful selection and training of qualified personnel, and a code of ethics adopted by our Board of Directors that is applicable to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company.

Because of its inherent limitations, no matter how well designed, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements.  Internal controls can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Further, the evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting was made as of a specific date, and continued effectiveness in future periods is subject to the risks that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may decline.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of December 31, 2017.2019.  In conducting this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).  Based on our assessment, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.

2019.

As an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, we are exempt from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has not audited or issued an attestation report with respect to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2017.2019.

118

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d)13a‑15(d) or 15d-15(d)15d‑15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2017,2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

None.


119



PART III


ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information presented under the headings “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors,” “Directors and Executive Officers,” “Corporate Governance Matters” and “Section“Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Reports” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 (the “Proxy Statement”).


ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information presented under the headings “Corporate Governance Matters,” “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” and “Compensation and Other Information Concerning Our Executive Officers and Directors” in the Proxy Statement.


ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information presented under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement.


ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information presented under the headings “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance Matters” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information presented under the heading “Proposal 2 - Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2018”2020” in the Proxy Statement.


120



PART IV

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

ITEM 15.

(a)

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(a)    The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1)    Financial Statements:
(i)    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(1)

Financial Statements:

(ii)

(i)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(ii)

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018

(iii)

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017,2019,  December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 20152017

(iv)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2017,2019,  December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 20152017

(v)

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017,2019,  December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 20152017

(vi)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017,2019,  December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 20152017

(vii)    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(vii)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2)

(2)

Financial Statement Schedules: None. Financial statement schedules have been omitted since the required information is included in our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

(3)

Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

(b)

Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

(c)

Separate Financial Statements and Schedules: None. Financial statement schedules have been omitted since the required information is included in our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

ITEM 16.    FORM 10‑K SUMMARY

ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.


121



EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description

Exhibit No.

2.1

Description
2.1

2.2

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

4.3

10.1

4.4

10.2*

10.1(a)*

10.3*
10.4*

10.5*

10.1(b)*

10.6*
10.7*
10.8*


10.9*

10.10*

10.1(c)*

10.11*

10.1(d)*

10.12*

10.1(e)*

10.13*

10.2*

10.14*

10.3(a)

[reserved]

122

10.15*

10.3(b)

10.16*

10.3(c)

[reserved]

10.17*

10.4(a)*

10.18*

10.4(b)*

10.19*

10.5(a)

[reserved]

10.5(b)*

Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. Executive Officer Long-TermLong Term Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective April 19, 2018), which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1410.1 to our Registration StatementCurrent Report on Form S-48-K (file no. 333-204855)001-37615), initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 10, 2015.April 20, 2018.

10.20*

10.6*

10.21*

10.22*

10.7*

10.23*

10.8(a)*

[reserved]

10.24*

10.8(b)*

10.25*

10.9(a)*

10.26*

10.9(b)*

10.27*

10.9(c)*



123

10.10(b)*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Employees - without Employment Agreement) under the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-37615), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2018.

10.30*

10.10(c)*

10.31*

10.11(a)*

10.32*

10.11(b)*

10.33*

10.11(c)*

10.34*

10.11(d)*

10.11(e)*

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Employees - without Employment Agreement) under the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-37615), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2018.

10.12*

Form of Other Stock-Based Award Agreement (Executive Officer Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Award), which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-37615), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2016.

10.35*

10.13(a)*

10.13(b)*

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (Employees - without Employment Agreement) (form in use prior to October 17, 2018) (Executive Officer Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Award), which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-37615), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2018.

10.13(c)*

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (Employees - without Employment Agreement) (Executive Officer Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Award), which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(c) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 001-37615), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2019.

10.14*

First Security Group, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, as further amended and assumed by Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc., which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 (file no. 333- 204855), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2015.

10.36*

10.15*

10.37*

10.16*

10.38*

10.17*

124

10.39*

10.18*

10.40*

10.19*

10.41*

10.20*

[reserved]

10.21(a)*

Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. Change in Control Plan, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-37615), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2017.

10.21(b)*

Atlantic Capital Bancshares, Inc. 2017 Change in Control Plan, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-37615), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2017.

10.22*

Atlantic Capital Bank Severance Plan, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 001-37615), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2017.

10.23

Form of Stock Purchase Agreement by and between First Security Group, Inc. and each of the investors named therein, which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to our Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (file no. 333‑204855), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2015.

10.42*

10.24†

10.43*
10.44*

10.45*

21

21

23



31.1

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

101

The following materials from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):  (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016;2018; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017,2019, December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 2015;2017; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2017,2019, December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 2015;2017; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017,2019, December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 2015;2017; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017,2019, December 31, 2016,2018, and December 31, 2015;2017; and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

†Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K.


125

SIGNATURES



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 15th16th day of March, 2018.


2020.

ATLANTIC CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.

/s/ Douglas L. Williams

Douglas L. Williams

President & Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Patrick T. Oakes

Patrick T. Oakes

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



126


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on  March 15, 2018.

16,  2020.

Signature

Title

Signature

Title

/s/ Douglas L. Williams

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Douglas L. Williams

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Patrick T. Oakes

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Patrick T. Oakes

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ Walter M. Deriso, Jr.

Chairman of the Board

Walter M. Deriso, Jr.

/s/ Shantella E. Cooper

Director

Shantella E. Cooper

/s/ Henchy R. Enden

Director

Henchy R. Enden

/s/ James H. Graves

Director

James H. Graves

/s/ Douglas J. Hertz

Director

Douglas J. Hertz

/s/ Adam G. HurwichThomas M. Holder

Director

Adam G. Hurwich

Thomas M. Holder

/s/ Larry D. MauldinDirector
Larry D. Mauldin

/s/ R. Charles Shufeldt

Director

R. Charles Shufeldt

/s/ Lizanne Thomas

Director

Lizanne Thomas

/s/ Marietta Edmunds Zakas

Director

Marietta Edmunds Zakas



127





113