Table of Contents


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549-1004
Form 10-K
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 001-34960
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
STATE OF DELAWARE27-0756180
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  
300 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan48265-3000
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(313) 556-5000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on which Registered
Common StockNew York Stock Exchange/Toronto Stock Exchange
Warrants (expiring December 31, 2015)New York Stock Exchange
Warrants (expiring July 10, 2016)New York Stock Exchange
Warrants (expiring July 10, 2019)New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  þ  No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes  ¨  No  þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  þ  No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its company Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  þ  No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  þ  Accelerated filer  ¨  Non-accelerated filer  ¨  Smaller reporting company  ¨
Do not check if smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨  No  þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming only for purposes of this computation that directors and executive officers may be affiliates) was approximately $46.1$58.2 billion on June 30, 2013.2014.
As of January 30, 201428, 2015 the number of shares outstanding of common stock was 1,589,788,2821,610,365,961 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement related to the Annual Stockholders Meeting to be filed subsequently are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.



INDEX
   Page
PART I
Item 1.Business
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.Properties
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 Consolidated Income Statements
 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
 Consolidated Balance Sheets
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 Consolidated Statements of Equity
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 Note 1.Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
 Note 2.Significant Accounting Policies
 Note 3.Acquisition of Businesses
 Note 4.GM Financial Receivables, netMarketable Securities
 Note 5.Marketable SecuritiesGM Financial Receivables, net
 Note 6.Inventories
 Note 7.Equipment on Operating Leases, net
 Note 8.Equity in Net Assets of Nonconsolidated Affiliates
 Note 9.Property, net
 Note 10.Goodwill
 Note 11.Intangible Assets, net
 Note 12.Variable Interest Entities
 Note 13.Accrued Liabilities and Other Liabilities and Deferred Income Taxes
 Note 14.Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
 Note 15.Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
 Note 16.Derivative Financial Instruments
 Note 17.Commitments and Contingencies
 Note 18.Income Taxes
 Note 19.Restructuring and Other Initiatives
 Note 20.Interest Income and Other Non-Operating Income, net
 Note 21.Stockholders’ Equity and Noncontrolling Interests
 Note 22.Earnings Per Share
 Note 23.Stock Incentive Plans
 Note 24.Supplementary Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
 Note 25.Segment Reporting



   Page
 Note 26.Supplemental Information for the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.Other Information
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.Executive Compensation
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits
Signatures 





Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I
General Motors Company (sometimes referred to as “we,” “our,” “us,” “ourselves,” the “Company,” “General Motors,” or “GM") was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 2009 and on July 10, 2009 acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of General Motors Corporation through a Section 363 sale under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (363 Sale). General Motors Corporation is sometimes referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (2013 Form 10-K), for the periods on or before July 9, 2009, as “Old GM," as it is the predecessor entity solely for accounting and financial reporting purposes. On July 10, 2009 in connection with the 363 Sale, General Motors Corporation changed its name to Motors Liquidation Company, which is sometimes referred to in this 2013 Form 10-K for the periods after July 10, 2009 as “MLC.” On December 15, 2011 MLC was dissolved and the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust (GUC Trust) assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain claims against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not concluded prior to MLC's dissolution. MLC transferred to the GUC Trust all of MLC's remaining undistributed shares of our common stock and warrants to acquire our common stock.


1



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 1. Business

General Motors Company (sometimes referred to as “we,” “our,” “us,” “ourselves,” the “Company,” “General Motors,” or “GM") was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 2009. We design, build and sell cars, trucks and automobile parts worldwide. We also provide automotive financing services through General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (GM Financial).

Automotive

Our automotive operations meet the demands of our customers through our four automotive segments: GM North America (GMNA), GM Europe (GME), GM International Operations (GMIO) and GM South America (GMSA).

Our total worldwide retail vehicle sales were 9.9 million, 9.7 million, and 9.3 million and 9.0 millionincluding sales by joint ventures on a total vehicle basis, not based on the percentage ownership in the joint venture in the years ended December 31, 20132014, 20122013 and 20112012.

GMNA primarily meets the demands of customers in North America with vehicles developed, manufactured and/or marketed under the following brands:
•     Buick•     Cadillac•     Chevrolet•     GMC
Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC brands. The demands of customers outside North America are primarily met with vehicles developed, manufactured and/or marketed under the following brands:
•     Buick•     Chevrolet•     Holden•     Vauxhall
•     Cadillac•     GMC•     Opel

At December 31, 2013 weBuick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, Holden, Opel and Vauxhall brands. We also hadhave equity ownership stakes directly or indirectly in entities through various regional subsidiaries, primarily in Asia thatAsia. These companies design, manufacture and market vehicles under the following brands:
•     Alpheon•     Buick•     Chevrolet•     Wuling
•     Baojun•     Cadillac•     Jiefang
Alpheon, Baojun, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Jiefang and Wuling brands.

In addition to the products we sell to our dealers for consumer retail sales, we also sell cars and trucks to fleet customers, including daily rental car companies, commercial fleet customers, leasing companies and governments. We sell vehicles to fleet customers directly or through our network of dealers. Our retail and fleet customers can obtain a wide range of aftersale vehicle services and products through our dealer network, such as maintenance, light repairs, collision repairs, vehicle accessories and extended service warranties.

Competitive Position

Information in this 2013 Form 10-K relating to our relative position in the global automotive industry is based upon the good faith estimates of management and includes all sales by joint ventures on a total vehicle basis, not based on the percentage of ownership in the joint venture. Market share information in this 2013 Form 10-K is based on retail vehicle sales volume. Retail vehicle sales data, which represents estimated sales to the end customer, including fleets, does not correlate directly to the revenue we recognize during the period. However, retail vehicle sales data is indicative of the underlying demand for our vehicles. Worldwide market share and vehicle sales data excludes the markets of Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria.

Retail sales volume includes vehicles produced by certain joint ventures. The joint venture agreements with SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co., Ltd. (SGMW) and FAW-GM Light Duty Commercial Vehicle Co., Ltd. (FAW-GM) allow for significant rights as a member as well as the contractual right to report SGMW and FAW-GM joint venture sales in China.

The global automotive industry is highly competitive. The principal factors that determine consumer vehicle preferences in the markets in which we operate include price, quality, available options, style, safety, reliability, fuel economy and functionality. Market leadership in individual countries in which we compete varies widely.

Wholesale and Retail Vehicle Sales


2
We present both wholesale and retail vehicle sales data to assist in the analysis of our revenue and our market share. We do not currently export vehicles to Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan or Syria. Accordingly, these countries are excluded from industry sales data in the tables below and corresponding calculations of our market share.

Wholesale Vehicle Sales


GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Wholesale vehicle sales data, which represents sales directly to dealers and others, is the measure that correlates vehicle sales to our revenue from the sale of vehicles, which is the largest component of automotive Net sales and revenue. Wholesale vehicle sales exclude vehicles produced by nonconsolidatedunconsolidated joint ventures. In the year ended December 31, 2014, 52.9% of our wholesale vehicle sales volume was generated outside the U.S. The following table summarizes total wholesale vehicle sales of new vehicles by automotive segment (vehicles in thousands):
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
GMNA3,276
 3,207
 3,053
3,320
 55.0% 3,276
 51.1% 3,207
 49.8%
GME1,047
 1,079
 1,240
1,172
 19.4% 1,163
 18.1% 1,231
 19.1%
GMIO1,037
 1,109
 1,039
655
 10.9% 921
 14.4% 957
 14.8%
GMSA1,053
 1,050
 1,090
886
 14.7% 1,053
 16.4% 1,050
 16.3%
Worldwide6,413
 6,445
 6,422
6,033
 100.0% 6,413
 100.0% 6,445
 100.0%


1



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Retail Vehicle Sales

InRetail vehicle sales data, which represents estimated sales to the year ended December 31, 2013 71.3%end customer, including fleets, does not correlate directly to the revenue we recognize during the period. However, retail vehicle sales data is indicative of the underlying demand for our vehicles, is the basis for our market share, and is based upon the good faith estimates of management. Retail vehicle sales data includes sales by joint ventures on a total vehicle basis, not based on the percentage of ownership in the joint venture. Certain joint venture agreements in China allow for the contractual right to report vehicle sales of non-GM trademarked vehicles by those joint ventures. Market share information is based primarily on retail vehicle sales volume, was generated outsidebut estimates may be used where retail vehicle sales volume is not available.

In countries where end customer data is not readily available other data sources, such as wholesale or forecast volumes, are used to estimate retail vehicle sales. Certain fleet sales that are accounted for as operating leases are included in retail vehicle sales at the U.S.time of delivery to the daily rental car companies. The following table summarizes total industry retail sales volume, or estimated sales volume where retail sales volume is not available, of new vehicles of domestic and foreign makes and the related competitive position by geographic region (vehicles in thousands):
Vehicle Sales(a)(b)(c)
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Industry GM 
GM as
a % of
Industry
 Industry GM 
GM as
a % of
Industry
 Industry GM 
GM as
a % of
Industry
Industry GM 
GM as
a % of
Industry
 Industry GM 
GM as
a % of
Industry
 Industry GM 
GM as
a % of
Industry
North America                                  
United States15,891
 2,786
 17.5% 14,794
 2,596
 17.5% 13,048
 2,504
 19.2%16,858
 2,935
 17.4% 15,894
 2,786
 17.5% 14,794
 2,596
 17.5%
Other3,202
 448
 14.0% 3,053
 424
 13.9% 2,753
 421
 15.3%3,379
 478
 14.1% 3,201
 448
 14.0% 3,041
 423
 13.9%
Total North America19,092
 3,234
 16.9% 17,847
 3,019
 16.9% 15,801
 2,925
 18.5%20,237
 3,413
 16.9% 19,095
 3,234
 16.9% 17,835
 3,019
 16.9%
Europe                                  
Germany3,357
 237
 7.1% 3,258
 242
 7.4% 3,394
 254
 7.5%
United Kingdom2,597
 301
 11.6% 2,335
 272
 11.7% 2,249
 281
 12.5%2,845
 305
 10.7% 2,597
 301
 11.6% 2,335
 272
 11.7%
Germany3,258
 242
 7.4% 3,394
 254
 7.5% 3,508
 299
 8.5%
Russia2,843
 258
 9.1% 3,006
 288
 9.6% 2,725
 243
 8.9%2,541
 189
 7.4% 2,834
 258
 9.1% 3,006
 288
 9.6%
Other10,074
 756
 7.5% 10,248
 796
 7.8% 11,613
 928
 8.0%9,988
 525
 5.3% 9,715
 592
 6.1% 9,878
 655
 6.6%
Total Europe18,772
 1,557
 8.3% 18,983
 1,611
 8.5% 20,096
 1,751
 8.7%18,731
 1,256
 6.7% 18,404
 1,393
 7.6% 18,613
 1,469
 7.9%
Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa                                  
China(d)22,119
 3,160
 14.3% 19,394
 2,836
 14.6% 18,697
 2,547
 13.6%23,861
 3,540
 14.8% 22,202
 3,160
 14.2% 19,394
 2,836
 14.6%
Other(d)18,676
 726
 3.9% 18,834
 780
 4.1% 15,944
 735
 4.6%
Other19,119
 838
 4.4% 19,117
 898
 4.7% 19,113
 919
 4.8%
Total Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa40,795
 3,886
 9.5% 38,229
 3,616
 9.5% 34,641
 3,282
 9.5%42,980
 4,378
 10.2% 41,319
 4,058
 9.8% 38,507
 3,755
 9.7%
South America                                  
Brazil3,767
 650
 17.3% 3,802
 643
 16.9% 3,633
 632
 17.4%3,498
 579
 16.6% 3,767
 650
 17.3% 3,802
 643
 16.9%
Other2,169
 388
 17.9% 2,047
 408
 19.9% 2,054
 434
 21.1%1,803
 299
 16.6% 2,173
 387
 17.8% 2,044
 408
 20.0%
Total South America5,936
 1,037
 17.5% 5,849
 1,051
 18.0% 5,687
 1,066
 18.8%5,301
 878
 16.6% 5,940
 1,037
 17.5% 5,846
 1,051
 18.0%
Total Worldwide(e)84,595
 9,715
 11.5% 80,908
 9,297
 11.5% 76,225
 9,024
 11.8%87,249
 9,925
 11.4% 84,758
 9,722
 11.5% 80,801
 9,294
 11.5%
United States                                  
Cars7,591
 1,067
 14.1% 7,214
 1,031
 14.3% 6,060
 952
 15.7%7,688
 1,085
 14.1% 7,556
 1,067
 14.1% 7,174
 1,031
 14.4%
Trucks4,244
 998
 23.5% 3,946
 933
 23.7% 3,681
 929
 25.2%4,753
 1,113
 23.4% 4,247
 998
 23.5% 3,946
 933
 23.7%
Crossovers4,056
 721
 17.8% 3,634
 631
 17.4% 3,306
 622
 18.8%4,417
 737
 16.7% 4,091
 721
 17.6% 3,674
 632
 17.2%
Total U.S.15,891
 2,786
 17.5% 14,794
 2,596
 17.5% 13,048
 2,504
 19.2%16,858
 2,935
 17.4% 15,894
 2,786
 17.5% 14,794
 2,596
 17.5%


3
2



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

__________The following table summarizes the vehicle sales at our China joint ventures (China JVs) that are included in our retail vehicle sales (vehicles in thousands):    
(a)North America vehicle sales primarily represent sales to the end customer. Europe, Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa and South America vehicle sales primarily represent estimated sales to the end customer. In countries where end customer data is not readily available other data sources, such as wholesale or forecast volumes, are used to estimate vehicle sales.
(b)
Certain fleet sales that are accounted for as operating leases are included in vehicle sales at the time of delivery to the daily rental car companies; however, revenue is not recognized at the date of initial delivery due to guaranteed repurchase obligations.
(c)Vehicle sales data may include rounding differences.
(d)
Includes the vehicle sales for joint ventures in the table below. Joint venture vehicle sales for General Motors India Private Limited and Chevrolet Sales India Private Limited (collectively GM India) are included in the table below through August 31, 2012. Refer to Notes 3 and 8 to our consolidated financial statements for further detail on our joint ventures and the acquisition of GM India.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Joint venture sales in China     
Shanghai General Motors Co., Ltd (SGM)
 
 1,200
SAIC General Motors Sales Co., Ltd.1,512
 1,331
 
SGMW and FAW-GM1,644
 1,501
 1,342
Joint venture sales in India     
GM India
 64
 111
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
SAIC General Motors Sales Co., Ltd. (SGMS)1,710
 1,515
 1,331
SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co., Ltd. and FAW-GM Light Duty Commercial Vehicle Co., Ltd.1,830
 1,644
 1,501

(e)Our vehicle sales volumes in the year ended December 31, 2013 reflect continued recovery in the U.S. despite an intense competitive environment. Growth was largely attributed to new portfolio entries. Our vehicle sales volumes in the year ended December 31, 2012 reflect an intensified competitive environment in the U.S., including aggressive competitor pricing and media spending, as well as key competitor new product launches. Our vehicle sales volumes in the year ended December 31, 2011 reflect the moderate improvement in certain facets of the U.S. economy which contributed to a slow but steady improvement in U.S. industry vehicle sales, as well as increased volumes in Russia and China.
In the year ended December 31, 2014 we estimate we had the largest market share in North America and South America, the number six market share in Europe and the number two market share in the Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa region. In the year ended December 31, 2014 the Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa region was our largest region by retail vehicle sales volume and represented 44.1% of our global retail vehicle sales.

Our retail vehicle sales volumes in the year ended December 31, 2014 grew at a slightly slower pace than the overall industry, resulting in a 0.1% industry share decline. All new and refreshed vehicles gained share in 2014, but were outpaced by losses on vehicles that were late in their lifecycle, largely due to an aggressive competitive environment. Our retail vehicle sales volumes in the year ended December 31, 2013 reflect continued recovery in the U.S. despite an intense competitive environment. Growth was largely attributed to new or refreshed models. Our retail vehicle sales volumes in the year ended December 31, 2012 reflect an intensified competitive environment in the U.S., including aggressive competitor pricing and media spending, as well as key competitor new product launches.

Fleet Sales and Deliveries

The sales and market share data provided previously includes both retail and fleet vehicle sales. Certain fleet transactions, particularly daily rental, are generally less profitable than retail sales. A significant portion of the sales to daily rental car companies are recorded as operating leases under U.S. GAAP with no recognition of revenue at the date of initial delivery due to guaranteed repurchase obligations. The following table summarizes estimated fleet sales and those sales as a percentage of total retail vehicle sales. Fleet sales data may include rounding differences (vehicles in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
GMNA758
 775
 740
814
 758
 775
GME490
 500
 564
505
 490
 500
GMIO415
 408
 378
414
 415
 408
GMSA184
 190
 246
176
 184
 190
Total fleet sales1,847
 1,873
 1,927
1,909
 1,847
 1,873
          
Fleet sales as a percentage of total vehicle sales19.0% 20.1% 21.4%
Fleet sales as a percentage of total retail vehicle sales19.2% 19.0% 20.2%

The following table summarizes U.S. fleet sales and those sales as a percentage of total U.S. retail vehicle sales (vehicles in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Daily rental sales450
 439
 431
Other fleet sales254
 217
 242
Total fleet sales704
 656
 673
Fleet sales as a percentage of total U.S. retail vehicle sales     
Cars29.5% 26.4% 30.6%
Trucks21.8% 24.2% 25.3%
Crossovers19.1% 18.6% 19.2%
Total vehicles24.0% 23.6% 25.9%


4
3



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Daily rental sales439
 431
 417
Other fleet sales217
 242
 222
Total fleet sales656
 673
 639
Fleet sales as a percentage of total vehicle sales     
Cars26.4% 30.6% 31.3%
Trucks24.2% 25.3% 24.2%
Crossovers18.6% 19.2% 18.8%
Total vehicles23.6% 25.9% 25.5%

Product Pricing

Several methods are used to promote our products, including the use of dealer, retail and fleet incentives such as customer rebates and finance rate support. The level of incentives is dependent in large part upon the level of competition in the markets in which we operate and the level of demand for our products. In 20142015 we will continue to price vehicles competitively, including offering strategic and tactical incentives as required. We believe this strategy, coupled with sound inventory management, will continue to strengthen the reputation of our brands and result in competitive prices.

Cyclical Nature of Business

Retail sales are cyclical and production varies from month to month. Vehicle model changeovers occur throughout the year as a result of new market entries. The market for vehicles depends on general economic conditions, credit availability and consumer spending.

Relationship with Dealers

We market vehicles worldwide primarily through a network of independent authorized retail dealers. These outlets include distributors, dealers and authorized sales, service and parts outlets.

The following table summarizes the number of authorized dealerships:
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
GMNA4,946
 5,015
 5,068
4,908
 4,946
 5,015
GME7,087
 7,574
 7,745
6,633
 7,087
 7,574
GMIO7,472
 6,915
 6,901
7,699
 7,472
 6,915
GMSA1,201
 1,250
 1,162
1,272
 1,201
 1,250
Total worldwide20,706
 20,754
 20,876
20,512
 20,706
 20,754

We and our joint ventures enter into a contract with each authorized dealer agreeing to sell to the dealer one or more specified product lines at wholesale prices and granting the dealer the right to sell those vehicles to retail customers from an approved location. Our dealers often offer more than one GM brand at a single dealership in a number of our markets in order to enhance dealer profitability. Authorized dealers offer parts, accessories, service and repairs for GM vehicles in the product lines that they sell using GM parts and accessories. Our dealers are authorized to service GM vehicles under our limited warranty program and those repairs are to be made only with GM parts. Our dealers generally provide their customers access to credit or lease financing, vehicle insurance and extended service contracts provided by GM Financial, Ally Financial, Inc. (Ally Financial) and other financial institutions.

The quality of GM dealerships and our relationship with our dealers and distributors are critical to our success as dealers maintain the primary sales and service interface with the end consumer of our products. In addition to the terms of our contracts with our dealers we are regulated by various country and state franchise laws that may supersede those contractual terms and impose specific regulatory requirements and standards for initiating dealer network changes, pursuing terminations for cause and other contractual matters.


5



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Research, Product Development and Intellectual Property

Costs for research, manufacturing engineering, product engineering and design and development activities relate primarily to developing new products or services or improving existing products or services including activities related to vehicle emissions control, improved fuel economy and the safety of drivers and passengers. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 research and development expenses were $7.4 billion, $7.2 billion $7.4 billion and $8.1$7.4 billion.

Our top priorityOne of our priorities for research is to continue to develop and advance our alternative propulsion strategy because energy diversity and environmental leadership are critical elements of our overall business strategy. Our objective is to be the recognized industry leader in fuel efficiency through the development of a wide variety of technologies to reduce petroleum consumption.

Fuel Efficiency


4



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

We are fully committed to improving fuel efficiency and meeting regulatory standards through a combination of strategies including: (1) extensive technology improvements to conventional powertrains; (2) increased use of smaller displacement engines and improved and advanced automatic transmissions; and (3) vehicle improvements including increased use of lighter, front-wheel drive architectures.

Alternative Fuel Vehicles

AlternativeWe believe alternative fuels offer the greatest near-term potential to reduce liquid petroleum consumption in the transportation sector. Leveraging experience and capability developed around these technologies in our global operations we continue to develop FlexFuel vehicles that can run on gasoline-ethanol blend fuels as well as vehicles that run on compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).

We currently offer 1613 FlexFuel vehicles in the U.S. for the 20142015 model year plus an additional four models to fleet and commercial customers capable of operating on gasoline, E85 ethanol or any combination of the two. We continue to study the future role FlexFuel vehicles may play in the U.S. in light of recent regulatory developments and the rate of development of the refueling infrastructure. In 2013 94%Brazil a substantial majority of vehicle sales in Brazilvehicles sold were FlexFuel vehicles capable of running on 100% ethanol blends. We also market FlexFuel vehicles in Australia, Thailand and other global markets where biofuels have emerged in the marketplace.

We support the development of biodiesel blend fuels, which are clean-burning alternative diesel fuels produced from renewable sources, and we provide biodiesel capabilities in other markets reflecting the availability of biodiesel blend fuels.

We produce CNG bi-fuel capable vehicles in Europe such as the Opel Zafira and in the U.S., with the Chevrolet Express and GMC Savana fullsizefull-size vans are offered to fleet(fleet and commercial customers,customers) and the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 2500 HD pick-up trucks (commercial and retail customers) that are capable of switching between gasoline or diesel and CNG. We also produce the CNG bi-fuel Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 2500 HD pick-up trucks that are available to both commercial and retail customers. In addition we recently announcedlaunched the offering of a CNG bi-fuel Chevrolet Impala full-size sedan to both fleet and retail markets starting in the summer of 2014.U.S. We offer LPG capable vehicles globally in select markets reflecting the infrastructure, regulatory focus and natural resource availability of the markets in which they are sold.

We support the development of biodiesel blend fuels, which are alternative diesel fuels produced from renewable sources, and we provide biodiesel capabilities in other markets reflecting the availability of biodiesel blend fuels.

Hybrid, Plug-In, Extended Range and Battery Electric Vehicles

We are investing significantly in multiple technologies offering increasing levels of vehicle electrification including eAssist, plug-in hybrid, extended range and battery electric vehicles. We currently offer 7seven models in the U.S. featuring some form of electrification and continue to develop plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology (PHEV) and extended range electric vehicles such as the Chevrolet Volt, Opel Ampera and Cadillac ELR. In 20132014 we introduced the Cadillac ELR extended range luxury coupe and introduced a second-generation Chevrolet Spark EV and planVolt at the 2015 North American International Auto Show. The next-generation Chevrolet Volt symbolizes our continued commitment to invest heavily to support the expansion of our electric vehicle offeringselectrification and in-housethe development and manufacturing capabilities of advanced batteries,accompanying electrification technologies including battery systems, electric motors and power control systems.advanced electronic controls.

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology

As part of our long-term strategy to reduce petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas emissions we are committed to continuing development of our hydrogen fuel cell technology. Our Chevrolet Equinox fuel cell electric vehicle demonstration programs, such as Project Driveway, have accumulated nearlymore than 3 million miles of real-world driving by consumers, celebrities, business partners and government agencies. These programs are helping us identify consumer and infrastructure needs to understand the business case for potential production of this technology.

6



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


GM and Honda entered into a long-term agreement to co-develop a next-generation fuel cell system and hydrogen storage technologies, aiming for the 2020 timeframe. The collaboration expects to succeed by sharing expertise, economies of scale and common sourcing strategies and builds upon GM's and Honda’s strengths as leaders in hydrogen fuel cell technology.
 
OnStar, LLC

OnStar, LLC (OnStar) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GM serving more than 6.56.8 million subscribers in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico and, through a joint venture, China.China, with expectations to expand to Europe. OnStar is a provider of connected safety, security and mobility solutions and advanced information technology and is available on the majority of our 20142015 model year vehicles. OnStar's key services include automatic crash response, stolen vehicle assistance, remote door unlock, turn-by-turn navigation, vehicle diagnostics, hands-free calling and hands-free calling.4G LTE wireless connectivity.

5



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


OnStar has developed a system based on the findings of a Center for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel which allows OnStar advisors to alert first responders when a vehicle crash is likely to have caused serious injury to the occupants. OnStar also launchedoffers a mobile application to provide subscribers with up-to-date vehicle information such as oil level, tire pressure and fuel level as well as providing remote start, remote door unlock and navigation services from a mobile phone.

Product Development

Our vehicle development activities are integrated into a single global organization. This strategy builds on earlier efforts to consolidate and standardize our approach to vehicle development. We define a global architecture as a specific range of performance characteristics and dimensions supporting a common set of major underbody components and subsystems with common interfaces.

A centralized organization is responsible for many of the non-visible parts of the vehicle such as steering, suspension, the brake system, the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system and the electrical system. This team works very closely with the global architecture development teams around the world, who are responsible for components that are unique to each brand, such as exterior and interior design, tuning of the vehicle to meet the brand character requirements and final validation to meet applicable government requirements.

Intellectual Property

We generate and hold a significant number of patents in a number of countries in connection with the operation of our business. While none of these patents by itself is material to our business as a whole, these patents are very important to our operations and continued technological development. We hold a number of trademarks and service marks that are very important to our identity and recognition in the marketplace.

Raw Materials, Services and Supplies

We purchase a wide variety of raw materials, parts, supplies, energy, freight, transportation and other services from numerous suppliers for use in the manufacture of our products. The raw materials are primarily composed of steel, aluminum, resins, copper, lead and platinum group metals. We have not experienced any significant shortages of raw materials and normally do not carry substantial inventories of such raw materials in excess of levels reasonably required to meet our production requirements.

In some instances, we purchase systems, components, parts and supplies from a single source and may be at an increased risk for supply disruptions. The inability or unwillingness of these sources to supply us with parts and supplies could have a material adverse effect on our production capacity. PurchasesTotal purchases from our two largest suppliers have ranged from approximately 10% to 11% of our total purchases from 20112012 to 2013.2014.

Environmental and Regulatory Matters

Automotive Emissions Control

We are subject to laws and regulations that require us to control automotive emissions, including vehicle exhaust emission standards, vehicle evaporative emission standards and onboard diagnostic (OBD) system requirements. Advanced OBD systems are used to identify and diagnose problems with emission control systems. Problems detected by the OBD system may increase warranty costs and the chance for recall. Emission and OBD requirements become more challenging each year as vehicles must

7



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

meet lower emission standards and new diagnostics are required and will continue to become even more stringent throughout the world.

North AmericaU.S. and Canada

The U.S. federal government imposes stringent emission control requirements on vehicles sold in the U.S. and additional requirements are imposed by various state governments. Canada’s federal government isvehicle criteria emission requirements are generally aligned with the U.S. federal requirements. These requirements include vehicle exhaust emission standards, vehicle evaporative emission standards and OBD system requirements. Each model year we must obtain certification for each test group that our vehicles will meet emission requirements from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) before we can sell vehicles in the U.S. and Canada and from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) before we can sell vehicles in California and other states that have adopted the California emissions requirements. Fleet-wide emissions compliance must also be achieved based on a sales-weighted fleet average.

6



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


While we believe all our products are currently in compliance with EPA and CARB regulatorycertification requirements, both agencies have ongoing “in-use” evaluations of compliance for products from all manufacturers. It is possible that we or either agency could identify potential non-compliance, which could lead to some type of field action to remedy the issue. Testing is conducted at various times. This includes pre-production testing of vehicles as part of certification and in-use testing of customer vehicles at specified mileages.

CARB has adopted its next round of emission requirements which phase in with the 2015 model year. These requirements include more stringent exhaust emission and evaporative emission standards. The EPA has proposed similar requirements which if adopted are expected to phasestandards including an increase in with the 2017 model year. These new requirements will also increase the time and mileage periods over which manufacturers are responsible for a vehicle's emission performance.

California law requires that 12% of 2014 model year cars and certain light-duty trucks sold in the state must be zero emission vehicles (ZEV) such as electric vehicles or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. The requirement is based on a complex system of credits that vary in magnitude by vehicle type and model year. Manufacturers have the option of meeting a portion of this requirement with partial ZEV credit for vehicles that meet very stringent exhaust and evaporative emission standards and have extended emission system warranties. Additional portions of the ZEV requirement can be met with vehicles that meet these partial ZEV requirements and incorporate advanced technology such as hybrid and plug-in hybrid electric propulsion systems meeting specified criteria. We are complying with the ZEV requirements using a variety of means including producing vehicles certified to the ZEV and partial ZEV requirements. CARB has adopted 2018 model year and later requirements for increasing volumes of ZEVs to achieve greenhouse gas as well as criteria pollutant emission reductions to help achieve the state's long-term greenhouse gas reduction goals. A portion of this requirement may be metThe EPA has adopted similar exhaust emission and evaporative emission standards which phase in with PHEVs that meet specified criteria including an extendedthe 2017 model year. These new requirements will also increase the time and mileage periods over which manufacturers are responsible for a vehicle's emission system warranty.performance.

The Clean Air Act permits states that have areas with air quality compliance issues to adopt the California car and light-duty truck emission standards in lieu of the federal requirements. Thirteen states as well as the Province of Quebec currently have these standards in effect and 10 of these 13 states have adopted the ZEV requirements. Additional states could also adopt the California standards in the future.

Vehicles equipped with heavy-duty engines are also subject to stringent emission requirements. We also certify heavy-duty engines for installation in other manufacturers' products. We are using a system of credits to help meet these stringent standards as permitted by EPA and CARB regulations. We are meeting OBD requirements for heavy-duty vehicles with certain hardware and software changes.

In Mexico we must obtain model year certification from the Federal Environmental Protection Agency for each engine family and vehicle line before we can sell vehicles. Stringent light-duty vehicle emission requirements applicable to vehicles sold in Mexico are enforced starting 18 months after nationwide availability of Ultra Low Sulfur Fuels. Emission requirements applicable to medium- and heavy-duty trucks powered by gasoline, CNG or LPG were upgraded in 2012. Stringent emission requirements applicable to medium- and heavy-duty trucks powered by diesel have been proposed but no enforcement date has been established yet.

Regulations to control the emissions of greenhouse gases are discussed under “Automotive Fuel Economy” since we believe these regulations are effectively a form of a fuel economy requirement.

Europe

8



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Emissions are regulated by two different entities: the European Commission (EC) and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The EC imposes harmonized emission control requirements on vehicles sold in all 28 European Union (EU) Member States and other countries apply regulations under the framework of the UNECE. We must demonstrate that vehicles will meet emission requirements in witness tests and type approval from an approval authority before we can sell vehicles in the EU Member States. Type approval requires the manufacturer to provide a representative vehicle to the evaluating agency who then determines if the particular type of vehicle is fully compliant with the applicable regulations. The regulatory requirements include random testing of newly assembled vehicles and a manufacturer in-use surveillance program. EU and UNECE requirements are equivalent in terms of stringency and implementation.

A new level of exhaust emission standards for cars and light-duty trucks, Euro 5, was effective in 2011. Future European emission standards focus particularly on further reducing emissions from diesel vehicles. The Euro 6 emission levels will become effective in 2017. The new requirements will require additional technologies and further increase the cost of diesel engines, which currently cost more than gasoline engines. To comply with Euro 6 standards we expect that we will need to implement technologies identical to those being developed to meet U.S. emission standards. These technologies will put additional cost pressures on the already challenging European market for small-small and mid-size diesel vehicles. Gasoline engines are also affected by the new requirements. The measures for gasoline vehicles that require technology to reduce exhaust pollutant emissions will have adverse effects on vehicle fuel economy which drives additional technology cost to maintain fuel economy.

In the long-term, notwithstanding the already low vehicle emissions in Europe, the EC will continue devising regulatory requirements on the emission test cycle, real driving emission, low temperature testing, fuel evaporation and OBD. We are currently in compliance with all material components of these requirements or expect to be in compliance by the required date.

International OperationsChina

China has implemented EuroEuropean type China 4 standards nationally with European OBD requirements nationwide for newly registered vehicles. Beijing currently requires many elements of Euro 5 standards forall newly registered vehicles. Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou each required China 5 standards by the end of 2014 for newly registered vehicles. Tianjin, Hebei Province, the Pearl River and the Yangtze River delta arearegions are each expected to require additional elements of EuroChina 5 standards in 2014. Nationwideprior to nationwide implementation of EuroChina 5 in 2017. The Beijing municipality is expected between 2015 and 2017. Beijing iscurrently considering the implementation of Euroa China unique emission standard for China 6 or EPAwith the potential to combine elements of European and U.S. standards as early as 2016 and Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery as early as 2017. For diesel-powered vehicles China has implemented Euro 4 standards for new type approvalsWe are currently in compliance with all material components of both light-duty diesel vehicles and all new registrations of heavy-duty diesel vehicles. Enforcement of Euro 4 standards for new diesel light-duty registrations beganthese requirements or expect to be in 2013.compliance by the required date.

South Korea has implemented the Euro 5 emission standards with European OBD requirements for diesel-powered vehicles and the CARB standards for gasoline/LPG-powered vehicles. Commencing in 2014 new type-approvals will require the vehicle to meet Euro 6 diesel standards. The government is also considering the introduction of amendments to the low-emission vehicle program, LEVIII of the CARB standards, for gasoline/LPG-powered vehicles with the planned implementation in 2016.Automotive Fuel Economy

India has implemented Euro 4 equivalent emission norms in 13 major cities of the country, where sulfur gasoline and diesel fuels (BS IV Fuel) are required and have been made available. Euro 4 norms are expected to apply in additional cities as BS IV fuels are made available in 2014 and 2015 in a phased manner.U.S.

South America

Certain countries follow the U.S. test procedures, standards and OBD requirements and others follow the EU test procedures, standards and OBD requirements with different levels of stringency. Brazil implemented national L5 low emission vehicle standardsCorporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) reporting is required for passengerthree separate fleets: domestically produced cars, imported cars and light commercial vehicles in 2009. L6light-duty trucks. Both car and light-duty truck standards were established using targets for light diesel vehicles were implemented in 2012various vehicle sizes and mandate OBD installation for light diesel vehicles in 2015. L6 standards for light gasoline vehicles arevehicle model sales volumes. In 2015 our domestic car standard is estimated to be implemented in 2014 for new vehicles and 2015 for all models. Argentina implemented Euro 4 standards starting with new vehicle registrations in 2009 and the implementation of Euro 5 standards has been delayed from 2014 to 2015 for new vehicles and from 2016 to 2017 for all vehicles. Chile has enforced Euro 5 or U.S. Tier 2 Bin 5 emission standards for diesel vehicles and will implement Euro 5 or U.S. Tier 2 Bin 5 standards for gasoline vehicles in September 2014.

Industrial Environmental Control

Environmental Matters

34.8 mpg, our import car standard is estimated

9
7



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

at 38.4 mpg, and our light-duty truck standard is estimated to be 25.6 mpg. Our current product plan is expected to be compliant with the federal CAFE program through the 2015 model year. In addition to federal CAFE the U.S. EPA requires compliance with greenhouse gas requirements that are similar to the CAFE program. Our current product plan is expected to be compliant with the federal greenhouse gas program through the 2015 model year. CARB has agreed that compliance with the federal program is deemed to be compliant with the California program for the 2012 through 2016 model years.

Europe

Legislation regulating fleet average CO2 emissions was implemented for passenger cars in 2012 with full compliance required by 2015. Requirements must be met through the introduction of CO2 reducing technologies on conventional engines or ultra-low CO2 vehicles such as the Chevrolet Volt and Opel Ampera. The EU has adopted an even more stringent CO2 regulation as of 2020. Along with the passenger car target, the EU also adopted a new fleet average target as of 2020. We are developing a compliance plan by adopting operational CO2 targets for each market entry in Europe.

Effective in 2012 an EC regulation required low-rolling resistance tires, tire pressure monitoring systems and gear shift indicators. An additional EC regulation has been adopted that will require labeling of tires for noise, fuel efficiency and rolling resistance, affecting vehicles at the point of sale as well as the sale of tires in the aftermarket.

China

China has both an individual vehicle pass-fail type approval requirement based on Phase 2 standards and a fleet fuel consumption requirement based on Phase 3 standards based on vehicle curb weight for the 2012 through 2015 calendar years. Implementation began in 2012 with full compliance to 6.9L/100km required by 2015. China has continued subsidies for fuel efficient vehicles, plug-in hybrid, battery electric and fuel cell vehicles. China is now working on a more aggressive Phase 4 fleet fuel consumption standard that is expected to apply beginning in 2016, with full compliance to 5.0L/100km required by 2020.

Industrial Environmental Control

Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to a wide range of environmental protection laws including those laws regulating air emissions, water discharges, waste management and environmental cleanup. Certain environmental statutes require that responsible parties fund remediation actions regardless of fault, legality of original disposal or ownership of a disposal site. Under certain circumstances these laws impose joint and several liability as well as liability for related damages to natural resources. Refer to Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on environmental matters including site remediation.

Facility Management

To mitigate the effects our worldwide operations have on the environment we are committed to convert as many of our worldwide facilities as possible to landfill-free facilities. At December 31, 2013 852014, 88 (or overapproximately 50%) of our manufacturing facilities were landfill-free facilities. Additionally we have 2534 non-manufacturing facilities that are landfill free. At our landfill-free manufacturing facilities approximately 96%93% of waste materials are recycled or reused and 4%6% is converted to energy at waste-to-energy facilities. Including construction, demolition and remediation wastes, we estimate that we recycled, reused, or composted over 2 million metric tons of waste materials at our global manufacturing operations and estimate that we converted approximately 75,000100,000 metric tons of waste materials to energy at waste-to-energy facilities in the year ended December 31, 2013.

In 2013 we surpassed our internal 2020 Manufacturing Commitment initiative to reduce total waste on a kg/vehicle basis by 10%, having reduced total waste by more than 45 kg/vehicle (including metals and foundry-related wastes). Total waste includes all byproducts from routine manufacturing operations, excluding construction, demolition and remediation wastes and materials that are sent for direct reuse (without processing).2014.

In addition to providing environmental benefits our landfill-free program and total waste reduction commitments generate revenue from the sale of production by-products, reduce our energy costs,carbon footprint, and help to reduce the risks and financial liabilities associated with waste disposal.

We continue to make progress on our other 2020 Manufacturing commitments including the implementation of our global energy strategy with a goalsearch for ways to increase our use of renewable energy and improve our energy efficiency. Our data collection and management system is designedAt December 31, 2014 we have implemented projects globally that have increased our renewable energy capacity by over 35 megawatts, bringing our total renewable energy capacity to monitor and measureover 100 megawatts. In 2014 we also met the Environmental Protection Agency Energy Star Challenge for Industry at an additional 14 of our sites globallyby reducing energy use as well as calculateintensity an average of 17%. To meet the related CO2 emissions including collecting and verifyingEPA challenge industrial sites must reduce energy water and other environmental data from our facilities. Our approachintensity by 10% in five years or fewer. All 14 sites achieved the goal in no more than four years, with most meeting it in less than two years, bringing the total number of GM-owned sites to addressing climate change includes setting a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target, collecting accurate data, and by publicly reporting progress against our target.have met the Energy Star Challenge to 70.
 
Automotive Fuel Economy

North America

Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) reporting is required for three separate fleets: domestically produced cars, imported cars and light-duty trucks. Beginning with the 2011 model year both car and light-duty truck standards were established using targets for various vehicle sizes and vehicle model sales volumes. In 2014 our domestic car standard is estimated to be 33.8 mpg, our import car standard is estimated at 37.2 mpg, and our light-duty truck standard is estimated to be 24.5 mpg. Our current product plan is expected to be compliant with the federal CAFE program.

In August 2012 the EPA and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) finalized a coordinated national program consisting of new requirements for the 2017 through 2025 model year light-duty vehicles that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel economy. This regulation represents a continuation of the national program that has been established for the 2012 through 2016 model year light-duty vehicles. This program includes EPA and NHTSA standards that will require an industry-wide standard by 2016. Our current product plan projects compliance with both federal programs through 2016.

The CARB regulates greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles (which is the same as regulating fuel economy). This California program is currently established for the 2009 through 2016 model years. CARB has agreed that compliance with the federal program is deemed to be compliant with the California program for the 2012 through 2016 model years.

A Canadian governmental agency implemented greenhouse gas standards that were harmonized with U.S. standards beginning with the 2011 model year. However these regulations do not require the separation of car fleet into domestic and import vehicles. The Province of Quebec had previously adopted standards for the 2009 through 2016 model years that were equivalent to the California program but has revised their regulations to allow compliance with the national standards effective with the 2012 model year.Chemical Regulations

10
8



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Mexico has adopted fuel economy targets similar to the U.S. for 2012-2016 model years. The Mexico standards offer additional flexibilities when compared to the U.S. requirements to account for the differences in terrain type, vehicle mix and fuel quality. Discussions for post 2016 standards are expected to begin in 2014 calendar year.

Europe

Legislation regulating fleet average CO2 emissions was implemented for passenger cars in 2012. Based on a target function of CO2 to vehicle weight, each automobile manufacturer must meet a specific sales-weighted fleet average target. The fleet average requirement began phasing in during 2012 with full compliance required by 2015. Automobile manufacturers can earn super-credits for the sales volume of vehicles having a specific CO2 value. This is intended to encourage the early introduction of ultra-low CO2 vehicles such as the Chevrolet Volt and Opel Ampera by providing an additional incentive to reduce the CO2 fleet average. Automobile manufacturers may gain credit for eco-innovations for those technologies which improve real-world fuel economy but may not show in the test cycle, such as solar panels on vehicles. There is also a 5% credit for FlexFuel vehicles if more than 30% of refueling stations in an EU Member State sell E85. Further regulatory detail is being developed. The legislation sets a target for 2020 with an impact assessment required to further assess and develop this requirement. We are developing a compliance plan by adopting operational CO2 targets for each market entry in Europe.

In 2011 the EU adopted a standard to regulate CO2 emissions from light commercial vehicles. This regulation is modeled after the CO2 regulation for passenger cars. It proposes that new light commercial vehicles meet a fleet average CO2 target with a phase-in of compliance from 2014 and full compliance required by 2016. The manufacturer-specific CO2 compliance target will be determined as a function of the weight of the vehicle with all standard equipment and fuel (vehicle curb weight). Flexibilities such as eco-innovations and super credits are part of the regulatory proposal as well. An EU long-term target for 2020 has been adopted for light commercial vehicles. We have developed a compliance plan by adopting operational CO2targets for each market entry in Europe.

In July 2012 the EU Commission released a regulatory proposal outlining the regulatory implementation for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles targets effective in 2020. Implementation of the target has been delayed with final release expected in early 2014. While the passenger car target is expected to remain in place beginning in 2020, in that first year (2020) only 95% of the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) fleet is required to comply. Full 100% compliance will be required in 2021. The individual manufacturer targets will continue to be determined based on the average vehicle mass. Other compliance flexibilities will be limited adding additional challenges to compliance with the CO2 fleet target.

Effective in November 2012 an EC regulation required low-rolling resistance tires, tire pressure monitoring systems and gear shift indicators, which we adopted in 2011. An additional EC regulation has been adopted that will require labeling of tires for noise, fuel efficiency and rolling resistance, affecting vehicles at the point of sale as well as the sale of tires in the aftermarket.

Seventeen EU Member States have introduced fuel consumption or CO2 based vehicle taxation schemes. Tax measures are within the jurisdiction of the EU Member States. We are faced with significant challenges relative to the predictability of future tax laws and differences in the tax schemes and thresholds.

International Operations

We face new or increasingly more stringent fuel economy standards in many countries. China has established new Phase 3 fuel economy standards supplementing the current Phase 2 pass-fail system with a corporate fleet average scheme based on vehicle curb weight for the 2012 through 2015 model years. Implementation began in 2012 with full compliance required by 2015. China has continued its retail subsidies for consumers for fuel efficient vehicles, extended range and plug-in, battery electric and fuel cell vehicles. China is now working on a more aggressive Phase 4 fuel economy standard that is expected to apply to the 2016 through 2020 model years.

In Korea fuel economy/CO2 targets for 2012 through 2015 were implemented as part of the government's low carbon/green growth strategy. These targets are based on each vehicle's curb weight and in general are set at levels more stringent than fuel economy targets in the U.S. but less stringent than CO2 targets in the EU. The targets began being phased in during 2012 with full compliance by 2015 with manufacturers having the option to certify based on either fuel consumption or CO2 emissions. Each manufacturer has been given a corporate target to meet based on its overall industry fleet fuel economy/CO2 average. GM Korea Company's (GM Korea) current product portfolio is expected to comply with the targets by 2015. However, in 2014 the Korean

11



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

government plans to set more stringent fuel economy targets for 2016 and beyond that will likely reach the level in Japan by 2020 and the level in the EU by 2025.

In Saudi Arabia the government is developing a footprint-based fuel economy standard modeled on the U.S. system, which would likely commence in 2016 using the U.S. target value curves from 2011 or 2012. The Saudi program is not expected to include the alternative fuel/advanced technology vehicle and other credits from the U.S. program.

In India the government is developing a weight-based CO2/fuel efficiency regulation that is likely to be implemented in 2017. It is expected that the regulatory standards could be similar but less stringent than levels required in the EU with tighter standards planned for 2022.

In Australia the current government's agenda no longer includes the adoption of attribute-based CO2 standards.

South America

In Brazil the government has set new fuel economy requirements called INOVAR AUTO. OEMs have mandatory fleet average compliance required by October 2017 with a reduction from 2012 levels. The Brazilian government provides indirect tax incentives to eligible participant companies that meet certain requirements including these energy efficiency targets. The level of potential indirect tax incentives varies based on the degree and timing to which the targets are met. Participating companies that fail to meet the required criteria are subject to clawback provisions and specific fines.

In Chile every new passenger vehicle up to a certain vehicle weight is required to be tested under Euro procedure in order to determine its reference values to be included in the new mandatory fuel economy label. As a result of this process the label indicates the fuel consumption values for city, highway and combined city-highway and the CO2 emission values.

Chemical Regulations

We continually monitor the implementation of chemical regulations to maintain compliance and evaluate their effect on our business, suppliers and the automotive industry.
 
North AmericaU.S. and Canada

Governmental agencies in both the U.S. and Canada continue to introduce new regulations and legislation related to the selection and use of safer chemical alternatives,chemicals or substances of concern by mandating broad prohibitions, green chemistry, life cycle assessmentanalysis and product stewardship initiatives. These initiatives will give broad regulatory authority to ban or restrict the use of certain chemical substances and potentially affect automobile manufacturers' responsibilities for vehicle life-cycle, includingcomponents at the end of a vehicle's life, as well as, chemical substance selection for product development and manufacturing. Chemical restrictions in Canada are progressing more rapidly than in the U.S. as a result of Environment Canada’s Chemical Management Plan to assess existing substances and implement risk management controls on any chemical deemed toxic. These emerging regulations will potentially lead to increases in costs and supply chain complexity. We are currently in compliance with all material components of these requirements or expect to be in compliance by the required date.

In California two chemical initiatives will become effectiveThe U.S. Congress is currently pursuing an update of the Toxic Substances Control Act to grant the EPA more authority to regulate and ban chemicals from use in 2014: the brake pad reformulation law andU.S. which, if passed, is expected to greatly increase the safer consumer products regulations. The brake pad reformulation law requires brake and vehicle manufacturers to ensure brakes produced after January 2014 meet limits for the amountslevel of certain heavy metals and are properly certified and labeled. Under the safer consumer products regulation California EPA will begin regulating specific consumer products that containof chemicals of concern. It is not yet known when vehicle components will be targeted.in vehicles.

Europe

In 2007 the EU implemented its regulatory requirements, the EU REACH regulation among others, to register, evaluate, authorize and restrict the use of chemical substances. This regulation requires chemical substances manufactured in or imported into the EU in quantities of one metric ton or more per year to be registered with the European Chemicals Agency before 2018. During the pre-registration phase, Old GM and its suppliers registered those substances identified by this regulation. It is to be phased-in over a 10-year period. Under this regulation, “substances of very high concern” may either require authorization for further use or may be restricted in the future. This could potentially increase the cost of certain alternative substances that are used to manufacture vehicles and parts, or result in a supply chain disruption when a substance is no longer available to meet production timelines. Our research and development initiatives may be diverted to address future requirements. We are currently in compliance with all material components of these requirements or expect to be in compliance by the required date.

Safety


12



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

In the U.S. if a vehicle or vehicle equipment does not comply with a safety standard or if a vehicle defect creates an unreasonable safety risk the manufacturer is required to notify owners and provide a remedy. We are required to report certain information relating to certain customer complaints, warranty claims, field reports and notices and claims involving property damage, injuries and fatalities in the U.S. and claims involving fatalities outside the U.S. We are also required to report certain information concerning safety recalls and other safety campaigns outside the U.S.

Outside the U.S. safety standards and recall regulations often have the same purpose as the U.S. standards but may differ in their requirements and test procedures. Other countries sometimes pass regulations which are more stringent than U.S. standards. Many countries require type approval while the U.S. and Canada require self-certification.Refer to Note 13 for more information on significant recall activities in 2014.

Vehicular Noise Control

In the U.S. passenger cars and light-duty trucks are subject to state and local motor vehicle noise regulations. We identify the most stringent state and local requirements and validate to those requirements. Medium to heavy-duty trucks are regulated at the federal level. Federal truck regulations preempt all U.S. state or local noise regulations for trucks over a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 lbs.

Outside the U.S. noise regulations have been established by authorities at the national and supranational level (e.g., EC or UNECE).level. We believe that our vehicles meet all applicable noise regulations in the markets where they are sold. The EC has proposed new noise regulationsIn 2014 the EU published a directive that would mandatemandates a significant decrease in vehicle noise emissions. These proposals are coupledemissions with a new test procedure to better estimate the actual in-use noise emission of vehicles.mandatory application beginning in 2016. The proposalsdirective of the ECEU also formforms the basis for amendment to UNECE vehicle regulations, with the expected effect that maximum noise regulations will become more stringent in all markets outside of North America. At this point, the final noise emission levels as well as the implementation timing of the final regulations are uncertain.

While current noise emission requirements regulate maximum allowable noise levels, formal proposals are under development to regulate minimum sound levels. These proposals stem from concern that relatively quiet vehicles, specifically hybrids and

9



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

electrics, may not be readily heard by pedestrians. In the U.S., NHTSANational Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking onin January 14, 2013 and the U.S. Department of Transportation indicated a final rule is expected to be published in 2015. The UNECE is developing a Global Technical Regulation, sponsored by the U.S., Japan, and the EU, for manufacturers to equip vehicles with pedestrian alerting devices where the vehicle fails to meet minimum sound emission levels.

We are committed to designing and manufacturing vehicles to comply with these regulations and potential noise emission regulations that may come from these proposals.

Potential Effect of Regulations

We are actively working on aggressive near-term and long-term plans to develop and bring to market technologies designed to further reduce emissions, mitigate remediation expenses related to environmental liabilities, improve fuel efficiency, monitor and enhance the safety features of our vehicles and provide additional value and benefits to our customers. This is illustrated by our commitment to marketing more hybrid vehicles, our accelerated commitment to developing electrically powered vehicles, our use of biofuels in our expanded portfolio of FlexFuel vehicles and enhancements to conventional internal combustion engine technology which have contributed to the fuel efficiency of our vehicles. The conversion of many of our manufacturing facilities to landfill-free status has shown our commitment to mitigate potential environmental liability. We believe that the development and global implementation of new, cost-effective energy technologies in all sectors is the most effective way to improve energy efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate environmental liabilities.

Despite these advanced technology efforts, our ability to satisfy fuel economy, CO2 and other emissions requirements is contingent on various future economic, consumer, legislative and regulatory factors that we cannot control or predict with certainty. If we are not able to comply with specific new requirements, which include higher CAFE standards and state CO2 requirements such as those which require the CARB to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles, then we could be subject to sizeable civil penalties or have to restrict product offerings drastically to remain in compliance. Environmental liabilities for which we may be responsible are not reasonably estimable and could be substantial. Violations of safety or emissions standards could result in the recall of one or more of our products, negotiated remedial actions, possible fines or a combination of any of those items. We must also cover the cost of repairs conducted under emission defect and performance warranties which apply for specified periods of time and mileage. In turn any of these actions could have substantial adverse effects on our operations including facility idling, reduced employment, increased costs and loss of revenue.

13



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Pension Legislation

We are subject to a variety of U.S. federal rules and regulations including the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended and the Pension Protection Act of 2006 which govern the manner in which we fund and administer our pension plans. In July 2012 the U.S. government enacted the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act which allows plan sponsors funding relief for U.S. pension plans through the application of higher funding interest rates. Under current economic conditions we expect the new law to further delay required contributions to our U.S. pension plans. The new law does not impact our reported funded status.

Export Control

We are subject to U.S. export control laws and regulations and most countries in which we do business have applicable export controls. Our Office of Export Compliance and our global Export Compliance Officers are responsible for working with our business units to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial

GM Financial is our global captive automotive finance company that has been operating since 1992.company. GM Financial conducts its business in North America and, as a result of the 2013 acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations, in Europe and Latin America. Latin America includes operations located in Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. In January 2015 GM Financial expects to complete in 2014completed the acquisition of Ally Financial's equity interest in SAIC-GMAC Automotive Finance Company Limited (formerly known as GMAC-SAIC Automotive Finance Company Limited (GMAC-SAIC) thatLimited) (SAIC-GMAC) which conducts automotive finance and financial services operations in China.

GM Financial provides consumer lending, both loan and lease, across the credit spectrum. Additionally GM Financial offers commercial products to dealer customers that include new and used vehicle inventory financing, inventory insurance, working capital, capital improvement loans, fleet financing and storage center financing.

In North America GM Financial's consumer automobile finance programs in North America include sub-prime lending, full credit spectrum leasing and, full spectrum leasing.more recently, prime lending. The sub-prime lending programs predominantly offer financingprogram is primarily offered to consumers with FICO scores of less than 620 who have limited access to automobile financing through banks and credit unions. The typical borrower has experienced prior credit difficulties or has limited credit historyunions, and generally has a credit bureau score ranging from 500 through 700. Since GM Financial provides financing in a relatively high-risk market it expectsis expected to sustain a higher level of credit losses than other more traditional sourcesprime lending. GM Financial is currently seeking to expand its prime lending programs through our franchised dealers and anticipates that prime lending will become an increasing percentage of financing.originations and the consumer portfolio balance over time. The full spectrum leasing product is offered through our franchised dealers and primarily targets prime and sub-prime consumers leasing new vehicles. GM Financial seeks to provide competitive alternatives to existing marketplace lease offerings in our franchised dealers. GM Financial services its loan and lease portfolio at regional centers using automated servicing and collection systems.

In April 2012 and March 2013, GM Financial launched the U.S. and Canadian commercial lending platforms to further support our franchised dealerships and their affiliates. These platforms are centered on floor plan financing of dealer vehicle inventory and dealer loans to finance dealer sites, facilities, facility improvements and working capital. These loans are made on a secured basis.

Internationally GM Financial’s international consumer lendingautomobile finance programs focus on financing prime quality consumers, purchasing our new and used vehicles. In manyleasing in several countries GM Financial also offers financial leases, a lease/retail hybrid product that includes a balloon payment at expiration, and finance-related insurance products through third parties, such as credit life, gap and extended warranty coverage. Commercial products offered to dealer customers include new and used vehicle inventory financing, inventory insurance, working capital and capital improvement loans. Other commercial products include fleet financing and storage center financing.

GM Financial seeks to fund its operations in each country through local sources of funding to minimize currency and country risk. GM Financial primarily finances its loan, lease and commercial origination volume through the use of secured and unsecured bank lines,credit facilities, through public and private securitization transactions where such markets are developed and to a lesser extent in Latin America, through public financing programs including the issuance of commercial paper and other financing programs.unsecured debt.

GM Financial retains an interest in the securitization transactions in the form of restricted cash accounts and overcollateralization, whereby more receivables are transferred to the securitization trusts than the amount of asset-backed securities issued by the securitization trusts, as well as the estimated future excess cash flows expected to be received by GM Financial over the life of the securitization. Excess cash flows result from the difference between the finance charges received from the obligors on the receivables and the interest paid to investors in the asset-backed securities net of credit losses and expenses.

Excess cash flows in the securitization trusts are initially utilizedretained to fund credit enhancement requirements in order to attain specific credit ratings for the asset-backed securities issued by the securitization trusts. Once targeted credit enhancement requirements are reached and maintained excess cash flows are distributed to GM Financial. In addition to excess cash flows GM Financial receives monthly base servicing fees

Employees

At December 31, 2014 we employed 216,000 employees of whom 136,000 (63%) were hourly employees and collects other fees such as late charges as servicer for securitization trusts.80,000 (37%) were salaried employees. At December 31, 2014, 51,000 (56%) of our U.S. employees were represented by unions, a majority of which were represented by the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agriculture Implement Workers of America (UAW). The following table summarizes worldwide employment (in thousands):

14
10



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Employees

At December 31, 2013 we employed 219,000 employees of whom 142,000 (65%) were hourly employees and 77,000 (35%) were salaried employees. The following table summarizes worldwide employment (in thousands):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
GMNA(a)109
 101
 98
110
 109
 101
GME35
 37
 39
37
 37
 40
GMIO(b)38
 39
 34
33
 36
 36
GMSA31
 32
 33
29
 31
 32
GM Financial(c)(b)6
 4
 3
7
 6
 4
Total Worldwide219
 213
 207
216
 219
 213
          
U.S. - Salaried36
 30
 29
40
 36
 30
U.S. - Hourly51
 50
 48
51
 51
 50
_________
(a)Increase in GMNA employees in the year ended December 31, 2013 includes an increase of approximately 4,000 employees due to insourcing of certain information technology support functions that were previously provided by outside parties and an increase of approximately 3,000 employees due to increase in launches and ramp up in manufacturing volume.
(b)
Increase in GMIO employees in the year ended December 31, 2012 includes an increase of 4,000 employees due to the acquisition of GM India. Refer to Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for detail regarding the acquisition.
(c)Increase in GM Financial employees in the year ended December 31, 2013 is due to the acquisition of certainthe Ally Financial international operations.

At December 31, 2013 51,000 of our U.S. employees (or 59%) were represented by unions, a majority of which were represented by the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agriculture Implement Workers of America (UAW).

Executive Officers of the Registrant
TheAs of February 4, 2015 the names and ages as of February 6, 2014 of our executive officers and their positions and offices with GM are as follows:

11



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Name and (Age) Present GM Position (and Effective(Effective Date) Positions Held During the Past Five Years if Other than Present GM Position (and Effective(Effective Date)
Mary T. Barra (52)(53) Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors (2014) 
Executive Vice President, Global Product Development, Purchasing & Supply Chain (2013)
Senior Vice President, Global Product Development (2011)
Vice President, Global Human Resources (2009)
Vice President, Global Manufacturing Engineering (2008)
Daniel Ammann (41)(42) President (2014) 
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (2013)
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (2011)
GM Vice President, Finance & Treasurer (2010)
Morgan Stanley - Managing Director and Head of Industrial Investment Banking (2004)
Jaime Ardila (58)(59) Executive Vice President & President, South America (2013) 
Vice President & President, South America (2010)
President and Managing Director of GM Mercosur (2007)
Alan S. Batey (50)(51) Executive Vice President & President, GM North America (2014) 
Senior Vice President, Global Chevrolet and Brand Chief and U. S. Sales and Marketing (2013)
GM Vice President, U.S. Sales and Service, and Interim GM Chief Marketing Officer (2012)
Vice President, U.S. Chevrolet Sales and Service (2010)
Chairman & Managing Director, Holden, Ltd. (2009)
Executive Director, Sales, Marketing & Aftersales, Holden, Ltd. (2006)
James B. DeLuca (52)(53) Executive Vice President, Global Manufacturing (2014) 
Vice President, Manufacturing, GM International Operations (2013)
Vice President, Quality, GM International Operations (2009)
Vice President, Quality, GM Asia Pacific and GM Daewoo Auto & Technology (2007)

15



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Name and (Age)Present GM Position (and Effective Date)Positions Held During the Past Five Years if Other than Present GM Position (and Effective Date)
Stefan Jacoby (55)(56) Executive Vice President, GM Consolidated International Operations (2013) 
Volvo Car Corporation - Global Chief Executive Officer and President (2010)
Volkswagen Group of America - Chief Executive Officer and President (2007)
Timothy E. Lee (63)(a)Executive Vice President & Chairman, GM China, Inc. (2014)
Executive Vice President, Global Manufacturing & Chairman, GM China, Inc. (2013)
Executive Vice President, Global Manufacturing & President, International Operations (2013)
GM Vice President, Global Manufacturing & President, International Operations (2012)
GM Vice President & President, International Operations (2009)
Group Vice President, Global Manufacturing and Labor (2009)
GM North America Vice President, Manufacturing (2006)
Michael P. Millikin (65)(66)(a) Executive Vice President & General Counsel (2013) 
Senior Vice President & General Counsel (2011)
GM Vice President & General Counsel (2009)
Associate General Counsel (2005)
Karl-Thomas Neumann (52)(53) Executive Vice President & President, GM Europe & Chairman of the Management Board of Adam Opel AGGroup GmbH (2013) 
CEO, Adam Opel AGGroup GmbH & President, GM Europe (2013)
Volkswagen Group China - Chief Executive Officer and President (2010)
Volkswagen Group - Executive Vice President, Electromobility (2009)
Continental AG - Chief Executive Officer & Chief Technology Officer, Division Powertrain and President, Division Chassis & Safety (2008)
Mark L. Reuss (50)(51) Executive Vice President, Global Product Development, Purchasing & Supply Chain (2014) 
Executive Vice President & President, North America (2013)
GM Vice President & President, North America (2009)
GM Vice President, Global Vehicle Engineering (2009)
President & Managing Director, GM Holden, Ltd. (2008)
Charles K. Stevens, III (54)(55) Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (2014) 
Chief Financial Officer, GM North America (2010)
Interim Chief Financial Officer, GM South America (2011)
Executive Director, Finance, GM de Mexico (2008)
Matthew Tsien (53)(54) Executive Vice President & President, GM China, Inc. (2014) 
GM Consolidated International Operations Vice President, Planning, Program Management, & Strategic Alliances China (2012)
Executive Vice President, SAIC GM Wuling (2009)
Thomas S. Timko (45)(46) GM Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer (2013) 
Applied Materials Inc. - Corporate Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, and Corporate Controller (2010)
Delphi Automotive Corporation - Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (2006)
__________
(a)Retiring effective April 1, 2014.July 2015 and available for consulting services to the Company through 2015.

There are no family relationships as defined in Item 401 of Regulation S-K between any of the officers named above and there is no arrangement or understanding between any of the officers named above and any other person pursuant to which he or she was selected as an officer. Each of the officers named above was elected by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors to hold office until the next annual election of officers and until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. The Board of Directors elects the officers immediately following each annual meeting of the stockholders and may appoint other officers between annual meetings.

Segment Reporting Data


12



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Operating segment data and principal geographic area data for the years ended December 31, 20132014, 20122013 and 20112012 are summarized in Note 25 to our consolidated financial statements.

Website Access to Our Reports

Our internet website address is www.gm.com. In addition to the information about us and our subsidiaries contained in this 20132014 Form 10-K information about us can be found on our website including information on our corporate governance principles. Our website and information included in or linked to our website are not part of this 20132014 Form 10-K.

16



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The public may read and copy the materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Additionally the SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information. The address of the SEC's website is www.sec.gov.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We face a number of significant risks and uncertainties in connection with our operations. Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by the factors described below. While we describe each risk separately, some of these risks are interrelated and certain risks could trigger the applicability of other risks described below.

Our business is highly dependent on sales volume. There is no assurance that the global automobile market will not suffer a significant downturn.sales volume, which can be volatile.

Our business and financial results are highly sensitive to sales volume. A number of economic and market conditions drive changes in vehicle sales, including real estate values, levels of unemployment, the availability of credit, fluctuations in the cost of fuel, consumer confidence and consumer confidence.global economic conditions. We cannot predict future economic and market conditions with certainty and any change in economic and market conditions that negatively affects sales volumes could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.certainty.

Our ability to maintain profitability over the long-term is dependent upon our ability to introduce new and improved vehicle models that are able to attract a sufficient number of consumers.

Our ability to maintain profitability over the long-term depends on our ability to entice consumers to consider our products when purchasing a new vehicle. The automotive industry, particularly in the U.S., is very competitive with market participants routinely introducing new and improved vehicle models designed to meet consumer expectations, and in the past our competitors have been very successful in persuading customers that previously purchased our products to purchase their vehicles instead. Producing new and improved vehicle models on a basis competitive with the models introduced by our competitors and changing any negative perception, in light of Old GM's bankruptcy, will bepreserving our reputation for designing, building and selling safe and high quality cars that meet customer preferences is critical to our long-term profitability. We will launch a substantial number of new vehicles in 2014.2015. A successful launch of our new vehicles is critical to our short termshort-term profitability.

The pace of our development and introduction of new and improved vehicles depends on our ability to implement successfully improved technological innovations in design, engineering and manufacturing, which requires extensive capital investment.investment and the ability to retain and recruit new talent. In some cases the technologies that we plan to employ, such as hydrogen fuel cells and advanced battery technology, are not yet commercially practical and depend on significant future technological advances by us and by our suppliers. There can be no assurance that our competitors and others pursuing similar technologies and other competing technologies will not acquire similar or superior technologies sooner than we do or on an exclusive basis or at a significant price advantage. If we are unable to achieve these goals, we may not be able to maintain profitability over the long-term.

ShortagesOur profitability is dependent upon the success of and volatility in the price of oil have caused and may have a material adverse effect on our business due to shifts in consumer vehicle demand.

Volatile oil prices in recent years have tended to cause a shift in consumer demand towards smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles, which provide lower profit margins. Any increases in the price of oil in the U.S. or in our other markets or any sustained shortage of oil, including as a result of political instability in the Middle East, South America and African nations, could weaken the demand for our higher margin fullsizevehicles and luxury brands.

While we offer a balanced and complete portfolio of small, mid-size and large cars, cross-overs, sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and trucks, we generally recognize higher profit margins on our full-size pick-up trucks and sport utility vehicles, which could reduceSUVs. Our success is dependent upon consumer preferences and our ability to market share in affected markets, decrease profitability and have a material adverse effect on our business.higher margin vehicles.


17
13



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Our future competitiveness and ability to achieve long-term profitability depends on our ability to control our costs, which requires us to successfully implement restructuring initiatives throughout our automotive operations.

We are continuing to implement a number of cost reduction and productivity improvement initiatives in our automotive operations, including labor modifications and substantial restructuring initiatives. Our future competitiveness depends upon our continued success in implementing these initiatives throughout our automotive operations. While some of the elements of cost reduction are within our control, others, such as interest rates or return on investments, which influence our expense for pensions, depend more on external factors, and there can be no assurance that such external factors will not materially adversely affect our ability to reduce our costs. Reducing costs may prove difficult due to our focus on increasing advertising and our belief that engineering expenses necessary to improve the performance, safety and customer satisfaction of our vehicles are likely to increase.

Our automotive manufacturing operations are dependent upon the continued ability of our suppliers to provide us with systems, components and parts and anyAny disruption in our suppliers' operations could disrupt our production schedule and adversely affect our operations.schedule.

Our automotive operations are dependent upon the continued ability of our suppliers to deliver the systems, components, raw materials and parts that we need to manufacture our products. Our use of “just-in-time” manufacturing processes results in our havingallows us to maintain minimal inventoriesinventory quantities of the systems, components, raw materials and parts we need to conduct our automotive manufacturing operations.parts. As a result our ability to maintain production is dependent upon the continued ability of our suppliers to deliverdelivering sufficient quantities of systems, components, raw materials and parts at such times as allow uson time to meet our production schedules. In some instances we purchase systems, components, partsraw materials and suppliesparts from a single source and may be at an increased risk for supply disruptions. Where we experience supply disruptions, we may not be able to develop alternate sourcing quickly. Any disruption of our production schedule caused by an unexpected shortage of systems, components, raw materials or parts even for a relatively short period of time could cause us to alter production schedules or suspend production entirely and thus could adversely affect our financial results.entirely.

IncreaseAn increase in cost disruption of supply or shortage of raw materials could materially harm our business.

We use various raw materials in our business including steel, non-ferrous metals such as aluminum, and copper, and precious metals such as platinum and palladium. The prices for these raw materials fluctuate depending on market conditions. In recent years freight charges and raw material costs increased. Substantial increases in the prices for our raw materials increase our operating costs and could reduce our profitability if we cannot recoup the increased costs through increased vehicle prices. Some of these raw materials, such as corrosion-resistant steel, are only available from a limited number of suppliers. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to maintain favorable arrangements and relationships with these suppliers. An increase in the cost or a sustained interruption in the supply or shortage of some of these raw materials, which may be caused by a deterioration of our relationships with suppliers or by events such as labor strikes, could negatively affect our net revenues and profitability to a material extent.

We operate in a highly competitive industry that has excess manufacturing capacity and attempts by our competitors to sell more vehicles could have a significant negative effect on our vehicle pricing, market share and operating results.

The global automotive industry is highly competitive and overall manufacturing capacity in the industry exceeds demand. Many manufacturers have relatively high fixed labor costs as well as significant limitations on their ability to close facilities and reduce fixed costs. Our competitors may respond to these relatively high fixed costs by attempting to sell more vehicles by adding vehicle enhancements, providing subsidized financing or leasing programs, offering option package discounts or other marketing incentives or reducing vehicle prices in certain markets.prices. Manufacturers in lower cost countries such as China and India have emerged as competitors in key emerging markets and announced their intention of exporting their products to established markets as a bargain alternative to entry-level automobiles. These actions have had, and are expected to continue to have, a significant negative effect on our vehicle pricing, market share and operating results, and present a significant risk to our ability to enhance our revenue per vehicle.

Our competitors may be able to benefit from the cost savings offered by industry consolidation or alliances.

Designing, manufacturing and selling vehicles is capital intensive and requires substantial investments in manufacturing, machinery, research and development, product design, engineering, technology and marketing in order to meet both consumer preferences and regulatory requirements. Large original equipment manufacturers are able to benefit from economies of scale by leveraging their investments and activities on a global basis across brands and nameplates. If our competitors consolidate or enter into other strategic agreements such as alliances, they may be able to take better advantage of these economies of scale. We believe that competitors may be ablescale to benefit from the cost savings offered by consolidation or alliances, which could adversely affect

18



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

our competitiveness with respect to those competitors. Competitors could use consolidation or alliances as a means of enhancingenhance their competitiveness or liquidity position, which could also materially adversely affect our business.position.

Our business plan contemplates that we restructure our operations in various European countries, but we may not succeed in doing so,so.

14



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


We face difficult market and our failureoperating conditions in certain parts of the world that may require us to restructure, impair or rationalize these operationsoperations. In many countries across our regions we have experienced challenges in a cost-effective and non-disruptive manner could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In 2013 the European automotive industry continued to be severely affected by the ongoing sovereign debt crisis, high unemployment and a lack of consumer confidence coupled with overcapacity.

In response we are executing various actions to strengthen our European operations and increasecontinue to strategically assess the manner in which we operate in certain countries. As we continue to assess our competitiveness.performance throughout the regions, additional restructuring, impairment and rationalization actions may be required and may be material. The key areas of theour plan include:

(1) investments in our product portfolio;
(2) a revised brand strategy;
significant management changes;
and (3) reducing material, development and production costs; and
leveraging synergies from the alliance between us and Peugeot S.A. (PSA).

Notwithstanding the above we believe it is likely that adverse economic conditions and their effect on the European automotive industry will not improve significantly in the short-term and we expect to continue to incur losses in the region as a result. In addition thecosts. The success of our plan will depend on a combination of our ability to execute the actions contemplated, as well as external economic factors, which are outside of our control. Our inability

We could be materially adversely affected by a negative outcome in unusual or significant litigation, governmental investigations or other legal proceedings related to successfully restructurethe Ignition Switch Recall.

We are subject to legal proceedings involving various issues, including product liability lawsuits, stockholder litigation and governmental investigations, including class actions related to the Ignition Switch Recall, such as a lawsuit for the alleged diminished value of vehicles affected by the Ignition Switch Recall. Refer to the "GM North America" section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations (MD&A) for additional information on the Ignition Switch Recall. At this point we are unable to predict the duration, scope, developments in, results of or consequences of the government's investigations. Such lawsuits and investigations could in the future result in the imposition of damages, substantial fines, civil lawsuits and criminal penalties, interruptions of business, modification of business practices, equitable remedies and other sanctions against us or our Europeanpersonnel as well as significant legal and other costs. Because the matters are ongoing there can be no assurance as to how the resulting consequences, if any, may impact our business, reputation, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flow. We cannot currently estimate the potential liability, damages or range of potential loss as a result of the legal proceedings and implementgovernmental investigations. For a further discussion of these matters refer to Note 17 to our plan could have a material adverseconsolidated financial statements.

The costs and effect on our resultsreputation of product recalls could materially adversely affect our business.

From time to time we recall our products to address performance, compliance or safety-related issues. The costs we incur in connection with these recalls typically include the cost of the part being replaced and labor to remove and replace the defective part. In addition product recalls can harm our reputation and cause us to lose customers, particularly if those recalls cause consumers to question the safety or reliability of our products. Conversely not issuing a recall or not issuing a recall on a timely basis can harm our reputation and cause us to lose customers for the same reasons as expressed above.

We are subject to extensive governmental laws, regulations and policies including safety, fuel economy, and greenhouse gas emissions, the enforcement of which or changes to existing ones, may have a significant effect on how we do business.

We are affected significantly by governmental regulations that can increase costs related to the production of our vehicles and affect our product portfolio. We anticipate that the number and extent of these regulations, and the related costs and changes to our product lineup, will increase significantly in the future. These government regulatory requirements could significantly affect our plans for global product development and may result in substantial costs, including civil or criminal penalties. They may also result in limits on the types of vehicles we sell and where we sell them, which can affect revenue.

In the U.S. automotive safety standards are regulated by the NHTSA, whose regulators require that automotive manufacturers implement safety measures such as recalls for vehicles that do not or may not comply with relevant safety standards. Due to these regulations, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties or may incur various costs including significant costs for free repairs, if we are required to, or voluntarily decide to, implement safety measures such as a recall. For example, we are currently facing U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Congressional, SEC, Transport Canada and state investigations related to the Ignition Switch Recall.

In the U.S. vehicle fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions are regulated under a harmonized national program administered by the NHTSA and the EPA.

We are committed to meeting or exceeding these U.S. regulatory requirements. We expect that to comply with these requirements we will be required to sell a significant volume of hybrid electric vehicles, as well as implement new technologies for conventional internal combustion engines, all at increased cost levels. There is no assurance that we will be able to produce and sell vehicles that use such technologies on a profitable basis or that our customers will purchase such vehicles in the quantities necessary for us to comply with these regulatory programs.

15



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


If we are not able to comply with specific new requirements then we could be subject to sizeable civil penalties or have to restrict product offerings drastically to remain in compliance. Environmental liabilities for which we may be responsible are not reasonably estimable and could be substantial. Violations of safety or emissions standards could result in the recall of one or more of our products, negotiated remedial actions, possible fines or a combination of any of those items. We must also cover the cost of repairs conducted under emission defect and performance warranties which apply for specified periods of time and mileage. In turn any of these actions could have substantial adverse effects on our operations including facility idling, reduced employment, increased costs and financial condition.loss of revenue.

Our defined benefit pension plans are currently underfunded and our pension funding requirements could increase significantly due to a reduction in funded status as a result of a variety of factors, including weak performance of financial markets, declining interest rates, changes in assumptions and investments that do not achieve adequate returns.

Our employee benefit plans currently hold a significant amount of equity and fixed income securities. A detailed description of the investment funds and strategies is disclosed in the "Critical Accounting Estimates" section of the MD&A and Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements, which also describes significant concentrations of risk to the plan investments.

There are additional risks due to the complexity and magnitude of our investments. Examples include implementation of significant changes in investment policy, insufficient market capacity to absorb aliquidity in particular investment strategy or high volume transactionsasset classes and the inability to quickly rebalance illiquid and long-term investments.

Our future funding requirementrequirements for our U.S. defined benefit pension plans qualified with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) depend upon the future performance of assets placed in trusts for these plans, the level of interest rates used to determine funding levels, the level of benefits provided for by the plans and any changes in government laws and regulations. Future funding requirements generally increase if the discount rate decreases or if actual asset returns are lower than expected asset returns, as other factors are held constant. Our potential funding requirements are described in “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations -- Contractual Obligations and Other Long-Term Liabilities.”Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements.

Factors which affect future funding requirements for our U.S. defined benefit plans generally affect the required funding for non-U.S. plans. Certain plans outside the U.S. do not have assets and therefore the obligation is funded as benefits are paid. If local legal authorities increase the minimum funding requirements for our pensionnon-U.S. plans, outside the U.S., we could be required to contribute more funds,funds.

Shortages of and volatility in the price of oil may cause shifts in consumer vehicle demand.

Volatile oil prices in recent years have tended to cause a shift in consumer demand towards smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles, which would negatively affectprovide lower profit margins. Any increases in the price of oil or any sustained shortage of oil, including as a result of political instability in the Middle East, South America and African nations, could weaken the demand for our cash flow.higher margin full-size pick-up trucks and SUVs, which could decrease. Lower oil prices in oil producing countries could also impact our ability to sell vehicles in those countries.

We rely on GM Financial to provide financial services to our dealers and customers in a majority of the markets in which we sell vehicles. GM Financial faces a number of business, economic and financial risks that could impair its access to capital and negatively affect its business and operations and its ability to provide leasing prime and sub-prime financing to consumers and commercial lending to our dealers to support additional sales of our vehicles.

InWe rely on GM Financial in North America, GM Financial supports additional consumerEurope, South America and China to support leasing of our vehicles and additional sales of our vehicles to consumers requiring sub-prime vehicle financing as well as providingand also to provide commercial lending to our dealers. In Europe and South America we rely on GM Financial to support additional consumer leasing of our vehicles and additional sales of our vehicles to

19



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

prime consumers as well as providing commercial lending to our dealers. GM Financial is subject to various risks that could negatively affect its business, operations and access to capital and therefore its ability to provide leasing, prime and sub-prime financing options at competitive rates to consumers of our vehicles and commercial lending to our dealers. Because we rely on GM Financial to serve as an additional source of leasing, prime and sub-prime financing options for consumers and commercial lending to our dealers, any impairmentAny reduction of GM Financial's ability to provide such financial services would negatively affect our efforts to support additional sales of our vehicles and expand our market penetration among consumers who rely on these financial services to acquire new vehicles and dealers who seek financing.dealers. The factors that could adversely affect GM Financial's business and operations and impairreduce its ability to provide financing services at competitive rates include:

The ability to close the acquisition of GMAC-SAIC and integrate the acquired Ally Financial international operations into its business successfully;

The availability of borrowings under its credit facilities to fund its consumer and dealer finance activities pending securitization;

activities;
Its ability to transfer finance receivables and leases to securitization trusts and sell securities inaccess a variety of financing sources including the asset-backed securities market to generate cash proceeds to repay its credit facilities and fund additional finance receivablesother secured and leases;

unsecured debt markets;
The performance of loans and leases in its portfolio, which could be materially affected by delinquencies, defaults or prepayments;

16



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Wholesale auction values of used vehicles;

Higher than expected vehicle return rates and the residual value performance on vehicles GM Financial leases; and

Fluctuations in interest rates and currencies.currencies; and

The above factors, alone or in combination, could negatively affect GM Financial's businessChanges to regulation, supervision and operations or its ability to provide leasing, prime and sub-prime financing options to consumers to support additional sales of our vehicles and dealer financing.licensing across various jurisdictions.

Our planned investment in new technology in the future is significant and may not be funded at anticipated levels and, even if funded at anticipated levels, may not result in successful vehicle applications.

We intend to invest significant capital resources to support our products and to develop new technology. In addition we plan to invest heavily in alternative fuel and advanced propulsion technologies between 2014 andin 2015, largely to support our planned expansion of hybrid and electric vehicles. MoreoverHowever if our future operations do not provide us with the cash flow we anticipate, we may be forced to reduce, delay or cancel our planned investments in new technology.

In some cases the technologies that we plan to employ such as hydrogen fuel cells and advanced battery technology, are not yet commercially practical and depend on significant future technological advances by us and by suppliers. There can be no assurance that these advances in technology will occur in a timely or feasible way, that the funds that we have budgeted for these purposes will be adequate or that we will be able to establish our right to these technologies. However our competitors and others are pursuing similar technologies and other competing technologies and there can be no assurance that they will not acquire similar or superior technologies sooner than we do or on an exclusive basis or at a significant price advantage.

Security breaches and other disruptions to our information technology networks and systems could interfere with our operations and could compromise the confidentiality of our proprietary information.

We rely upon information technology networks and systems, including in-vehicle systems and mobile devices, some of which are managed by third-parties, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including supply chain management, manufacturing, invoicing and collection of payments from our dealer network and from customers of GM Financial. Additionally we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, the propriety business information of our dealers and suppliers, as well as personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, in data centers and on information technology networks. The secure operation of these information technology networks, and the processing and maintenance of this information, is critical to our business operations and strategy. Despite security measures and business continuity plans, our information technology networks and systems may be vulnerable to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to attacks by hackers or breaches due to errors or malfeasance by employees, contractors and others who have access to our

20



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

networks and systems or other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware, power outages, computer viruses, telecommunication or utility failures or natural disasters or other catastrophic events.viruses. The occurrence of any of these events could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. AnyWe have been the target of these types of attacks in the past with no material known impacts and future attacks are likely to occur. If successful, these types of attacks on our network or systems, including in-vehicle systems and mobile devices, or service failures could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, due to, among other things, the loss of proprietary data, interruptions or delays in our business operations and damage to our reputation. In addition any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disrupt operations and reduce the competitive advantage we hope to derive from our investment in advanced technologies. Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover all the costs related to significant security attacks or disruptions resulting from such attacks.

New laws, regulations or policies of governmental organizations regarding increased fuel economy requirements and reduced greenhouse gas emissions, or changes in existing ones, may have a significant effect on how we do business.

We are affected significantly by governmental regulations that can increase costs related to the production of our vehicles and affect our product portfolio. We anticipate that the number and extent of these regulations, and the related costs and changes to our product lineup, will increase significantly in the future. In the U.S. and Europe, for example, governmental regulation is driven primarily by concerns about the environment (including greenhouse gas emissions), vehicle safety, fuel economy and energy security. These government regulatory requirements could significantly affect our plans for global product development and may result in substantial costs, including civil penalties. They may also result in limits on the types of vehicles we sell and where we sell them, which can affect revenue.

In the U.S. vehicle fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions are regulated under a harmonized national program administered by the NHTSA and the EPA. The agencies have set coordinated fuel economy and greenhouse emission standards through the 2025 model year for light duty vehicles and through the 2018 model year for heavy duty trucks. California, which has set its own greenhouse gas emission standards through its AB 1493 Rules, has agreed to accept compliance with the national program as compliance with its state program.

We are committed to meeting or exceeding these U.S. regulatory requirements, and our product plan of record projects compliance with the anticipated national program through the 2021 model year. The standards for the 2022 through 2025 model years may be adjusted as a result of a mid-term review by the agencies. Therefore we believe it is premature to project compliance with possible standards for those years. We expect that to comply with these standards we will be required to sell a significant volume of hybrid electric vehicles, as well as implement new technologies for conventional internal combustion engines, all at increased cost levels. There is no assurance that we will be able to produce and sell vehicles that use such technologies on a profitable basis, or that our customers will purchase such vehicles in the quantities necessary for us to comply with these regulatory programs.

The EU passed legislation, effective in April 2009, that began regulating vehicle CO2 emissions in 2012. The legislation sets a target of a fleet average of 95 grams per kilometer for 2020, with the requirements for each manufacturer based on the weight of the vehicles it sells. Additional measures have been proposed or adopted in Europe to regulate features such as tire rolling resistance, vehicle air conditioners, tire pressure monitors, gear shift indicators and others. At the national level 17 EU Member States have adopted some form of fuel consumption or carbon dioxide-based vehicle taxation system, which could result in specific market requirements for us to introduce technology earlier than is required for compliance with the EU emissions standards.

Other governments around the world, such as Canada, China, Brazil, Mexico and South Korea are also creating or have new policies to address these same issues. As in the U.S. these government policies could significantly affect our plans for product development. Due to these regulations we could be subject to sizable civil penalties or have to restrict product offerings drastically to remain in compliance. The regulations will result in substantial costs, which could be difficult to pass through to our customers, and could result in limits on the types of vehicles we sell and where we sell them, which could affect our operations, including facility closings, reduced employment, increased costs and loss of revenue.

A significant amount of our operations are conducted by joint ventures that we cannot operate solely for our benefit.

Many of our operations, particularlyprimarily in emerging markets,China, are carried out by joint ventures such as SGM.Shanghai General Motors Co., Ltd. In joint ventures we share ownership and management of a company with one or more parties who may not have the same goals, strategies, priorities or resources as we do and may compete with us outside the joint venture. Joint ventures are intended to be operated for the equal benefit of all co-owners, rather than for our exclusive benefit. Operating a business as a joint venture often requires additional organizational formalities as well as time-consuming procedures for sharing information and making decisions. In joint ventures we are required to foster our relationships with our co-owners as well as promote the overall success of the joint venture, and if a co-owner changes or relationships deteriorate, our success in the joint venture may be materially adversely affected. The benefits

21



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

from a successful joint venture are shared among the co-owners, so that we do not receive all the benefits from our successful joint ventures.


17



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Our business in China is subject to aggressive competition and is sensitive to economic and market conditions.

Maintaining a strong position in the Chinese market is a key component of our global growth strategy. The automotive market in China is highly competitive, with competition from many of the largest global manufacturers and numerous smaller domestic manufacturers. As the size of the Chinese market continues to increase we anticipate that additional competitors, both international and domestic, will seek to enter the Chinese market and that existing market participants will act aggressively to increase their market share. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced margins and our inability to gain or hold market share. In addition our business in China is sensitive to economic and market conditions that drive sales volume in China. If we are unable to maintain our position in the Chinese market or if vehicle sales in China decrease or do not continue to increase, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.

We could be materially adversely affected by changes or imbalances in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.

Given the nature of the automotive industry and global spread of our business, we have significant exposures to risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, which can have material adverse effects on our business.rates. In preparing the consolidated financial statements we translate our revenues and expenses outside the U.S. into U.S. Dollars using the average foreign currency exchange rate for the period and the assets and liabilities using the foreign currency exchange rate at the balance sheet date. As a result foreign currency fluctuations and the associated translations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our businesses outside the U.S. expose us to additional risks that may materially adversely affect our business.risks.

The majority of our vehicles are sold outside the U.S. We are pursuing growth opportunities for our business in a variety of business environments outside the U.S. Operating in a large number of different regions and countries exposes us to political, economic and other risks as well as multiple foreign regulatory requirements that are subject to change, including:

Economic downturns in foreign countries or geographic regions where we have significant operations, such as China;

Economic tensions between governments and changes in international trade and investment policies, including imposing restrictions on the repatriation of dividends, especially between the U.S. and China;

ForeignChanges in foreign regulations impacting our overall business model restricting our ability to buy and sell our products in those countries;

countries, especially China;
Differing local product preferences and product requirements, including fuel economy, vehicle emissions and safety;

Impact of compliance with U.S. and other foreign countries’ export controls and economic sanctions;
Liabilities resulting from U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including those related to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and certain other anti-corruption laws;

Differing labor regulations and union relationships;

Consequences from changes in tax laws;

Difficulties in obtaining financing in foreign countries for local operations; and

Political and economic instability, natural calamities, war and terrorism.

The effects of these risks may, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect our business.

New laws, regulations or policies of governmental organizations regarding safety standards, or changes in existing ones, may have a significant negative effect on how we do business.

Our products must satisfy legal safety requirements. Meeting or exceeding government-mandated safety standards is difficult and costly because crashworthiness standards tend to conflict with the need to reduce vehicle weight in order to meet emissions and fuel economy standards. While we are managing our product development and production operations on a global basis to

22



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

reduce costs and lead times, unique national or regional standards or vehicle rating programs can result in additional costs for product development, testing and manufacturing. Governments often require the implementation of new requirements during the middle of a product cycle, which can be substantially more expensive than accommodating these requirements during the design of a new product.

The costs and effect on our reputation of product recalls could materially adversely affect our business.

From time to time we recall our products to address performance, compliance or safety-related issues. The costs we incur in connection with these recalls typically include the cost of the part being replaced and labor to remove and replace the defective part. In addition product recalls can harm our reputation and cause us to lose customers, particularly if those recalls cause consumers to question the safety or reliability of our products. Any costs incurred or lost sales caused by future product recalls could materially adversely affect our business. Conversely not issuing a recall or not issuing a recall on a timely basis can harm our reputation and cause us to lose customers for the same reasons as expressed above.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

*  *  *  *  *  *  *
Item 2. Properties

At December 31, 20132014 we had 104over 100 locations in 25 states and 81 cities or towns in the U.S., excluding our automotive financing operations and dealerships. Of these locations 40dealerships, which are primarily for manufacturing, facilities, of which 12 are engaged in the final assembly, of our vehicles, other manufactured automotive components and power products. Of the remaining locations 24 are customer care and aftersales operations primarily responsible for distribution, and warehouse functions and the remainder are offices or facilities primarily involved inwarehousing, engineering and testing vehicles.testing. Leased properties are primarily composed of warehouses and administration, engineering and sales offices.

We have 1615 locations in Canada and we have assembly, manufacturing, distribution, office or warehousing operations in 5961 other countries, including equity interests in associated companies which perform assembly, manufacturing or distribution

18



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

operations. The major facilities outside the U.S. and Canada, which are principally vehicle manufacturing and assembly operations, are located in:
 
•      Argentina•      Colombia•      Indonesia•      South Africa•      Uzbekistan
•      Australia•      Ecuador•      Kenya•      South Korea•      Venezuela
•      Brazil•      Egypt•      Mexico•      Spain•      Vietnam
•      Chile•      Germany•      Poland•      Thailand 
•      China•      India•      Russia•      United Kingdom 

We, our subsidiaries, or associated companies in which we own an equity interest, own most of the above facilities.

GM Financial's automotive financing and leasing operations leaseFinancial leases facilities for administration and regional credit centers. GM Financial has 2046 facilities, of which 22 are located in 15 states and 20 cities or towns in the U.S. Of these facilities, three are collections centers, 14 are regional credit centers and the remaining facilities are administrative offices. GM Financial has three facilities located in Canada including one collection center and 26 facilities in European and Latin American countries. The major facilities outside the U.S. and Canada are located in Canada, the United Kingdom, Brazil and Brazil.

Our properties include facilities which, in our opinion, are suitable and adequate for the manufacture, assembly and distribution of our products.Spain.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

23



Table of ContentsRefer to Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for information relating to legal proceedings.
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


The following section summarizes material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business. We and the other defendants affiliated with us intend to defend all of the following actions vigorously.

GMCL Dealers' Claim

General Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) is defending a class action asserted on behalf of over 200 former GMCL dealers (the Plaintiff Dealers) which entered into wind-down agreements with GMCL in May 2009 asserting various claims related to those agreements. On March 1, 2011 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice approved certification of a class for the purpose of deciding a number of specifically defined issues including: (1) whether GMCL breached its obligation of “good faith” in offering the wind-down agreements; (2) whether GMCL interfered with the Plaintiff Dealers' rights of free association; (3) whether GMCL was obligated to provide a disclosure statement and/or disclose more specific information regarding its restructuring plans in connection with proffering the wind-down agreements; and (4) assuming liability, whether the Plaintiff Dealers can recover damages in the aggregate (as opposed to proving individual damages). A number of former dealers have opted out of participation in the litigation, leaving 181 dealers in the certified class. The parties are currently conducting discovery. Trial of the class issues is scheduled to occur in the third quarter of 2014.

UAW Claim

On April 6, 2010 the UAW filed suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan claiming that we breached our obligation to contribute $450 million to the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust (New VEBA). The UAW alleges that we were contractually required to make this contribution pursuant to the UAW-Delphi-GM Memorandum of Understanding Delphi Restructuring dated June 22, 2007. We believe this claim is without merit. On December 10, 2013 the court granted our motion for summary judgment and dismissed the claims asserted by the UAW, holding that the relevant agreement is unambiguous and does not require the payment sought. The UAW has appealed.

GM Korea Wage Litigation

Commencing on or about September 29, 2010 current and former hourly employees of GM Korea filed eight separate group actions in the Incheon District Court in Incheon, Korea. The cases, which in aggregate involve more than 10,000 employees, allege that GM Korea failed to include bonuses and certain allowances in its calculation of Ordinary Wages due under the Presidential Decree of the Korean Labor Standards Act. On November 23, 2012 the Seoul High Court (an intermediate level appellate court) issued a decision affirming a decision of the Incheon District Court in a case involving five GM Korea employees which was contrary to GM Korea's position. GM Korea appealed to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea (Supreme Court) and initiated a constitutional challenge to the adverse interpretation of the relevant statute. In December 2013 the Supreme Court rendered a decision in a case involving another company not affiliated with us which addressed many of the issues presented in the cases pending against GM Korea and resolved many of them in a manner which we believe is favorable to GM Korea. In particular, while the Supreme Court held that fixed bonuses should be included in the calculation of Ordinary Wages, it also held that claims for retroactive application of this rule would be barred under certain circumstances. We believe the Supreme Court’s reasoning is applicable to GM Korea, even though GM Korea’s case remains pending before the Supreme Court. Accordingly we have eliminated the accrual associated with these cases.

Inventory Management Securities Class Action

On June 29, 2012 a putative securities class action was filed against us and a number of our past and current officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (George G. Scott v. General Motors Company et al). Purporting to sue on behalf of owners of common stock deriving from our 2010 initial public offering, plaintiff asserts non-fraud prospectus based liability claims under various federal securities statutes alleging that the Company has made false statements about its vehicle inventory controls and production decisions, particularly with respect to fullsize trucks. The plaintiff's complaint requests compensatory damages, rescission and litigation costs, fees and disbursements. On November 21, 2012 the court appointed the Teamster's Local 710 Pension Fund as lead plaintiff in the matter. On February 1, 2013 the plaintiff filed an amended complaint.

Saab Automobile AB Related Litigation

On August 6, 2012 Saab Automobile AB and Spyker N.V. filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan alleging that GM tortuously interfered with their efforts to secure an investment in Saab Automobile AB from

24



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobile Co., Ltd and its affiliates by making public statements in December of 2011 to the effect that we did not favor the proposed transaction. The complaint alleges that absent the challenged statements, Saab Automobile AB would have successfully avoided liquidation and seeks damages of not less than $3.0 billion representing the projected value of Saab Automobile AB through 2016 plus pre- and post-judgment interest, special, punitive and other allowable damages and plaintiffs' reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. On June 18, 2013 the court granted GM’s motion to dismiss the case on multiple alternative grounds. Saab Automobile AB and Spyker N.V. have appealed.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

25
19



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Shares of our common stock have been publicly traded since November 18, 2010 when our common stock was listed and began trading on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange. The following table summarizes the quarterly price ranges of our common stock based on high and low prices from intraday trades on the New York Stock Exchange, the principal market inon which the stock is traded:
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012
 High Low High Low
Quarter       
First$30.68
 $26.19
 $27.68
 $20.75
Second$35.49
 $27.11
 $27.03
 $19.24
Third$37.97
 $33.41
 $25.15
 $18.72
Fourth$41.85
 $33.92
 $28.90
 $22.67
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013
 High Low High Low
First quarter$41.06
 $33.57
 $30.68
 $26.19
Second quarter$37.18
 $31.70
 $35.49
 $27.11
Third quarter$38.15
 $31.67
 $37.97
 $33.41
Fourth quarter$35.45
 $28.82
 $41.85
 $33.92

Holders

At January 30, 201428, 2015 we had a total of 1.6 billion issued and outstanding shares of common stock held by 403420 holders of record.

Dividends

So long as any share of our Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding, no dividend or distribution may be declared or paid on our common stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends have been paid on our Series A Preferred Stock, subject to exceptions, such as dividends on our common stock payable solely in shares of our common stock. Our secured revolving credit facilities contain certain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends on our common stock, subject to exceptions, such as dividends payable solely in shares of our common stock. At December 31, 2013 there were no dividends in arrears on our Series A Preferred Stock.

Since our formation, we had not paid any dividends on our common stock through the year ended December 31, 2013. In JanuaryBeginning in the first quarter of 2014 our Board of Directors declared, a dividendand we paid, quarterly dividends on common stock in the amount of $0.30 per share payable in March 2014.share. It is anticipated that dividends on our common stock will continue to be declared and paid quarterly subsequent to the initial dividend declaration.quarterly. However our payment of dividends in the future, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors and will be paid out of funds legally available for that purpose. Our payment of dividends in the future will depend on business conditions, our financial condition, earnings, liquidity and capital requirements the covenants in our secured revolving credit facilities and other factors.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Purchases of Equity Securities for Cash

No shares of common stock were purchased for cash in each of the three months ended December 31, 2013.2014.

Other Purchases of Equity Securities
 Total Number of Shares Purchased(a) Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased Under the Program Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Program
October 1, 2013 through October 31, 20131,833,227
 $36.50
 N/A N/A
November 1, 2013 through November 30, 201333,732
 $36.34
 N/A N/A
December 1, 2013 through December 31, 20131,989
 $39.12
 N/A N/A
Total1,868,948
 $36.50
    
 Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased Under Announced Programs Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under Announced Programs
October 1, 2014 through October 31, 20141,886,328
 $32.68
 N/A N/A
November 1, 2014 through November 30, 20142,833
 $31.28
 N/A N/A
December 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014509,219
 $32.53
 N/A N/A
Total2,398,380
 $32.65
    

Shares purchased consist of (1) shares of common stock retained by us for the payment of the exercise price upon the exercise of warrants; and (2) shares of common stock delivered by employees or directors back to us for the payment of taxes resulting from issuance of common stock upon the vesting of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Restricted Stock Awards relating to compensation plans. Refer to Note 23 of our consolidated financial statements for additional details on employee stock incentive plans and Note 21 of our consolidated financial statements for additional details on warrants issued.

26
20



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

_________
N/A = not applicable
(a)
Represents shares of common stock delivered by employees or directors back to us for the payment of taxes resulting from issuance of common stock upon the vesting of Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards relating to compensation plans and shares of common stock retained by us for the payment of exercise price upon the exercise of warrants. Refer to Note 23 to our consolidated financial statements for additional details on employee stock incentive plans and Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements for additional details on warrants issued.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *


27



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Pursuant to the agreement with the SEC, as described in a no-action letter issued to Old GM by the SEC Staff on July 9, 2009 regarding our filing requirements, the selected financial data below includes the selected financial data of Old GM as it is the Predecessor entity solely for accounting and financial reporting purposes. At July 10, 2009 we applied fresh-start reporting following the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 852, “Reorganizations". The consolidated financial statements for the periods ended on or before July 9, 2009 do not include the effect of any changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities as a result of the application of fresh-start reporting. Our financial information at and for any period after July 10, 2009 is not comparable to Old GM's financial information. Selected financial data is summarized in the following table (dollars in millions except per share amounts):
 Successor  Predecessor
 Years Ended December 31, July 10, 2009 Through December 31, 2009  January 1, 2009 Through July 9, 2009
2013 2012 2011 2010  
Income Statement Data:            
Total net sales and revenue(a)$155,427
 $152,256
 $150,276
 $135,592
 $57,474
  $47,115
Reorganization gains, net(b)$
 $
 $
 $
 $
  $128,155
Income (loss) from continuing operations$5,331
 $6,136
 $9,287
 $6,503
 $(3,786)  $109,003
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests15
 52
 (97) (331) (511)  115
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders(c)$5,346
 $6,188
 $9,190
 $6,172
 $(4,297)  $109,118
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$3,770
 $4,859
 $7,585
 $4,668
 $(4,428)  $109,118
Basic earnings (loss) per common share(d)$2.71
 $3.10
 $4.94
 $3.11
 $(3.58)  $178.63
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share(d)$2.38
 $2.92
 $4.58
 $2.89
 $(3.58)  $178.55
Balance Sheet Data (as of period end):            
Total assets(a)$166,344
 $149,422
 $144,603
 $138,898
 $136,295
   
Automotive notes and loans payable(e)$7,137
 $5,172
 $5,295
 $4,630
 $15,783
   
GM Financial notes and loans payable(a)$29,046
 $10,878
 $8,538
 $7,032
     
Series A Preferred Stock(f)$3,109
 $5,536
 $5,536
 $5,536
 $6,998
   
Series B Preferred Stock(g)$
 $4,855
 $4,855
 $4,855
     
Equity(h)$43,174
 $37,000
 $38,991
 $37,159
 $21,957
   
 At and for the Years Ended December 31,
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Income Statement Data:         
Total net sales and revenue$155,929
 $155,427
 $152,256
 $150,276
 $135,592
Income from continuing operations(a)$4,018
 $5,331
 $6,136
 $9,287
 $6,503
Net income attributable to stockholders$3,949
 $5,346
 $6,188
 $9,190
 $6,172
Net income attributable to common stockholders(b)$2,804
 $3,770
 $4,859
 $7,585
 $4,668
Basic earnings per common share(c)$1.75
 $2.71
 $3.10
 $4.94
 $3.11
Diluted earnings per common share(c)$1.65
 $2.38
 $2.92
 $4.58
 $2.89
Dividends declared per common share$1.20
 $
 $
 $
 $
Balance Sheet Data:         
Total assets(d)$177,677
 $166,344
 $149,422
 $144,603
 $138,898
Automotive notes and loans payable$9,410
 $7,137
 $5,172
 $5,295
 $4,630
GM Financial notes and loans payable(d)$37,431
 $29,046
 $10,878
 $8,538
 $7,032
Series A Preferred Stock(b)$
 $3,109
 $5,536
 $5,536
 $5,536
Series B Preferred Stock(e)  $
 $4,855
 $4,855
 $4,855
Equity(f)$36,024
 $43,174
 $37,000
 $38,991
 $37,159
_________
(a)GM Financial was consolidated effective October 1, 2010. GM Financial acquired Ally Financial's international operations in Europe and Latin America in
In the year ended December 31, 2013.
(b)In the period January 1, 2009 through July 9, 2009 Old GM2014 we recorded Reorganization gains, netcharges of $128.2approximately $2.9 billion directly associated with filingin Automotive cost of certainsales related to recall campaigns and courtesy transportation, a catch-up adjustment of its direct and indirect subsidiaries voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code$0.9 billion recorded in the U.S. Bankruptcy Courtthree months ended June 30, 2014 related to the change in estimate for recall campaigns and a charge of $0.4 billion related to the Southern District of New York, the 363 Sale of Old GM and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries and the application of fresh-start reporting.
(c)
ignition switch recall compensation program. In the year ended December 31, 2012 we recorded Goodwill impairment charges of $27.1 billion, the reversal of deferred tax valuation allowances of $36.3 billion in the U.S. and Canada, pension settlement charges of $2.7 billion and GME long-lived asset impairment charges of $5.5 billion.
(d)(b)In December 2014 we redeemed all of the remaining shares of our Series A Preferred Stock for $3.9 billion, which reduced Net income attributable to common stockholders by $0.8 billion. In September 2013 we purchased 120 million shares of our Series A Preferred Stock held by the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust (New VEBA) for $3.2 billion, which reduced Net income attributable to common stockholders by $0.8 billion.
(c)
In the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 we used the two-class method for calculating earnings per share as the Series B Preferred Stock was a participating security due to the applicable market value of our common stock being below $33.00 per common share.security. Refer to Note 22 to our consolidated financial statements for additional detail.
(e)(d)InGM Financial acquired Ally Financial's international operations in Europe and Latin America in the year ended December 2010 GM Korea terminated its $1.2 billion credit facility following the repayment of the remaining $1.0 billion under the facility.31, 2013.
(f)In September 2013 we purchased 120 million shares of our Series A Preferred Stock held by the New VEBA for $3.2 billion. In December 2010 we purchased 84 million shares from the UST for $2.1 billion.
(g)(e)In December 2013 all of our Series B Preferred Stock automatically converted into 137 million shares of our common stock. Our Series B Preferred Stock was issued in a public offering in November and December 2010.
(h)(f)
In December 2012 we purchased 200 million shares of our common stock for a total of $5.5$5.5 billion, which directly reduced shareholder'sstockholder's equity by $5.1 billion and we recorded a charge to earnings of $0.4 billion. Our Series A Preferred Stock was reclassified from temporary equity to permanent equity in the year ended December 31, 2010.


28



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Basis of Presentation

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)MD&A should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. We analyze the results of our business through our five segments: GMNA, GME, GMIO, GMSA and GM Financial. Consistent with industry practice, market share information includes estimates of industry sales in certain countries where public reporting is not legally required or otherwise available on a consistent basis.

In the three months ended March 31, 20132014 we changed our managerial and financial reporting structure to measurereclassify the results of our reportable segments revenue and profitability based on the geographic areaRussian subsidiaries previously reported in which we sell vehiclesour GMIO segment to third party customers.our GME segment. We have retrospectively revised the segment presentation for all periods presented. Refer to Note 25 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on this change.

OverviewNon-GAAP Measures

Automotive

Our vision is to design, build and sell the world’s best vehicles. The primary elements of our strategy to achieve this vision are to:

Deliver a product portfolio of the world’s best vehicles that includes cars, crossovers and trucks, allowing us to maximize sales under any market condition;
Sell our vehicles globally by targeting developed markets, which are projected to have increases in vehicle demand as the global economy recovers, and further strengthening our position in high growth emerging markets;
Improve revenue realization and maintain a competitive cost structure to allow us to remain profitable at lower industry volumes and across the lifecycle of our product portfolio;
Maintain a strong balance sheet by reducing financial leverage given the high operating leverage of our business model; and
Ensure that our dealers and customers have consistently available, transparent and competitive financing options through GM Financial and other providers.

We are committed to leadership in vehicle design, quality, reliability, telematics and infotainment and safety, as well as to developing key energy efficiency, energy diversity and advanced propulsion technologies, including electric vehicles. Our business is diversified across products and geographic markets. We meet the local sales and service needs of our retail and fleet customers with a global network of independent dealers.

GMNA

GMNA has sales, manufacturing and distribution operations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico and sales and distribution operations in Central America and the Caribbean. GMNA represented 51.1% of our wholesale vehicle sales volume in 2013 and we had the largest market share, based upon retail vehicle sales, in North America at 16.9%. We grew our retail market share in all four brands as compared to 2012. Our market share growth was driven in part by the success of several product launches during the year, most notably the Corvette Stingray, Chevrolet Impala, Cadillac CTS and the all-new Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra full-size trucks. Our products in the region continued to receive recognitions of excellence including the most initial quality awards as determined by JD Power and Associates as compared to any other automotive manufacturer in 2013.

GME

GME has sales, manufacturing and distribution operations across Western and Central Europe. GME's wholesale vehicle sales volume, which in addition to Western and Central Europe, includes Eastern Europe (including Russia and the other members of

29
21



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

the Commonwealth of Independent States among others) represented 16.3% of our wholesale vehicle sales volume in 2013. In 2013 we estimate we had the number four market share, based upon retail vehicle sales, in Europe at 8.3%. GMIO distributed Chevrolet brand vehicles in Europe. These vehicles are reported within market share for Europe, but wholesale vehicle sales volume is recorded by GMIO. Our European operations continue to show signs of improvement underscored by our first Opel and Vauxhall market share increase in 14 years. This market share increase was partially driven by the successful launches of the Opel Mokka, ADAM and Cascada during 2013. Our focus on successfully executing product launches and containing costs has in part contributed to significant year-over-year reduction in EBIT (loss)-adjusted.

In an effort to rationalize our manufacturing footprint in GME, we reached agreement with the labor union in Germany to terminate all vehicle and transmission production at our Bochum, Germany facility by the end of 2014. Affected employees will be eligible for a voluntary restructuring separation program. Restructuring charges will be recorded primarily through 2014. Refer to Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

GMIO

GMIO has sales, manufacturing and distribution operations in Asia/Pacific, the Middle East, Africa and Eastern Europe (including Russia and the other members of the Commonwealth of Independent States among others). GMIO represented 16.2% of our wholesale vehicle sales volume in 2013. The Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa region is our largest region by retail vehicle sales volume and represented 40.0% of our global retail vehicle sales volume in 2013. In 2013 we estimate we had the number two market share, based upon retail vehicle sales, in Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa at 9.5%. In 2013 we had market share of 14.3% in China. GMIO records the wholesale unit volume and financial results of Chevrolet brand vehicles that it distributes and sells in Europe. Our international operations' results were highlighted by our continued strength in China where we sold over 3 million vehicles. Our strength in the market was in part driven by the successful launches of the new Cadillac XTS, the refreshed Buick LaCrosse and Regal and certain Wuling branded vehicles, as well as continued strong sales of the Buick Encore and Buick Excelle. Our Buick brand continues to be our strongest brand in China with 810,000 vehicles sold in 2013 an increase of 16% from the prior year. In addition we have been making investments in our Cadillac brand in China which included a new assembly plant in Shanghai.

We are addressing many of the challenges in our GMIO operations and have performed strategic assessments on the performance and the manner in which we operate in certain countries. While we are continuing our strategic assessments we announced plans to discontinue offering mainstream Chevrolet vehicles in Europe in 2015 and recorded asset impairment and restructuring charges; announced plans to cease manufacturing at GM Holden Ltd., our subsidiary in Australia (Holden), and recorded asset impairment and restructuring charges; recorded asset impairment charges at GM India; and impaired our remaining goodwill in GMIO. Refer to the "GM International Operations" section of MD&A and Notes 9, 10 and 19 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Our GM Korea subsidiary has continuing litigation with more than 10,000 current and former employees over the definition of ordinary wages. As a result of the recent Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea’s favorable decision on a very similar wage litigation case involving another company we now believe an unfavorable outcome on our case given the new precedent is no longer probable and we reversed certain accruals for our cases. Refer to Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

GMSA

GMSA has sales, manufacturing, distribution and/or financing operations in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela as well as sales and distribution operations in Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay. GMSA represented 16.4% of our wholesale vehicle sales volume in 2013. In 2013 GMSA derived 63.5% of its wholesale vehicle sales volume from Brazil. In 2013 we estimate we had the number one market share, based upon retail vehicle sales, in South America at 17.5% and the number three market share, based upon retail vehicle sales, in Brazil at 17.3%. Despite foreign currency pressures and challenging political environments across the region, our South American operations experienced continued profitability in 2013 that was driven in part by successful product launches including the Chevrolet Onix, Prisma and Tracker. We have further addressed our cost structure through restructuring efforts and multi-year labor agreements in Brazil.

Our Venezuelan operations highlight some of the foreign currency and political pressures. In 2013 the Venezuelan government announced a change in the official fixed exchange rate which resulted in devaluation charges during the year. In addition to currency controls already in place, the Venezuelan government announced pricing controls that, taken with other initiatives, require us to

30



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

closely monitor and consider our ability to manage and control our Venezuelan subsidiaries. Refer to the "GM South America" section of MD&A for additional information.

Corporate

We continue to focus on strengthening our balance sheet. Initiatives during 2013 included lowering our cost of capital and increased financial flexibility by issuing $4.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes. We used proceeds from the issuance to prepay notes issued to the Canadian Health Care Trust (HCT) and to purchase 120 million shares of our Series A Preferred Stock from the New VEBA. Refer to Notes 14 and 21 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

As part of an effort to release capital from non-core assets and further enhance our financial flexibility we sold our common equity ownership in Ally Financial and our seven percent equity interest in PSA held by GME. Refer to Notes 5 and 12 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

The United States Treasury divested its remaining ownership stake in our common stock. Also, all of our shares of Series B Preferred Stock mandatorily converted into 137 million shares of our common stock and will result in future annual cash preferred stock dividend savings. Refer to Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Through ongoing discussions with taxing authorities we remeasured an uncertain tax position resulting in a tax benefit that will reduce future cash taxes.

Our collective actions during 2013 have helped us achieve investment grade status with a rating agency and we were added to the Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500.

Automotive Outlook

We anticipate the 2014 global automotive industry to be up approximately 2% over 2013 or about 85 million vehicles. For 2014 we expect our biggest challenges will be associated with unfavorable foreign currency pressures and planned global restructuring charges of up to $1.1 billion. However we expect to substantially offset these challenges with favorable pricing and by leveraging our continued strength in North America and China. We continue to progress toward our target of mid- to high-single digit margins for mid-decade and expect our 2014 EBIT-adjusted margins to be comparable to 2013. We are also committed to returning capital to our common stockholders and in January 2014 our Board of Directors declared a dividend on common stock in the amount of $0.30 per share payable in March 2014.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial

GM Financial purchases automobile finance contracts originated by GM and non-GM franchised and select independent dealers in connection with the sale of used and new automobiles. GM Financial also offers a lease financing product for new GM vehicles and a commercial lending program for GM-franchised dealerships. GM Financial's lending products in North America are primarily offered to consumers who typically are unable to obtain financing from traditional sources such as banks and credit unions. GM Financial utilizes a proprietary credit scoring system to differentiate credit applications and to statistically rank-order credit risk in terms of expected default rates, which enables it to evaluate credit applications for approval and tailor loan and lease pricing and structure. GM Financial services its loan and lease portfolios at regional centers using automated servicing and collection systems. Funding for our auto finance activities is primarily obtained through the utilization of our credit facilities and through securitization transactions.

In November 2012 GM Financial entered into agreements with Ally Financial to acquire Ally Financial's automotive finance and financial services businesses in Europe and Latin America and Ally Financial's equity interest in GMAC-SAIC that conducts automotive finance and financial services operations in China. The acquisitions will allow GM Financial to support our dealers in markets comprising approximately 80% of our global sales. In the year ended December 31, 2013 GM Financial completed the acquisitions of the operations in Europe and Latin America for $3.3 billion. GM Financial's acquisition of Ally Financial's equity interest in GMAC-SAIC is subject to certain regulatory and other approvals and is expected to close in 2014 for approximately $0.9 billion. Refer to Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on these acquisitions.

Consolidated Results

Total Net Sales and Revenue

31



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in Millions)
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change  Variance Due To
 2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other Total
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Automotive$152,092
 $150,295
 $1,797
 1.2%  $(0.2) $1.7
 $2.2
 $(1.9) $1.8
GM Financial3,335
 1,961
 1,374
 70.1%  
 
 
 1.4
 1.4
Total net sales and revenue$155,427
 $152,256
 $3,171
 2.1%  $(0.2) $1.7
 $2.2
 $(0.5) $3.2
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change  Variance Due To
 2012 2011 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other Total
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Automotive$150,295
 $148,866
 $1,429
 1.0%  $2.1
 $3.0
 $1.6
 $(5.3) $1.4
GM Financial1,961
 1,410
 551
 39.1%  
 
 
 0.6
 0.6
Total net sales and revenue$152,256
 $150,276
 $1,980
 1.3%  $2.1
 $3.0
 $1.6
 $(4.7) $2.0

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Automotive Total net sales and revenue increased due primarily to: (1) favorable vehicle pricing effect due primarily to GMNA of $1.9 billion; (2) favorable vehicle mix due primarily to GMNA of $1.3 billion and GMSA of $0.6 billion; partially offset by (3) Other of $1.9 billion due primarily to unfavorable net foreign currency effect of $2.3 billion due from the weakening of the Brazilian Real, Argentinian Peso and Venezuela Bolivar Fuerte against the U.S. Dollar; partially offset by increased other revenue of $0.4 billion due primarily to increases in OnStar and parts and accessories revenue; and (4) decreased wholesale volumes.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 GM Financial Total sales and revenue increased due primarily to: (1) increased finance charge income of $1.0 billion due to growth in the portfolio resulting from the acquisition of Ally Financial’s international operations and increased originations; and (2) increased leased vehicle income of $0.3 billion due to the increased size of the leased asset portfolio.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 Automotive Total net sales and revenue increased due primarily to: (1) favorable vehicle mix due primarily to GMSA of $1.6 billion, GMNA of $0.7 billion and GME of $0.4 billion; (2) increased wholesale volumes due primarily to GMNA of $3.8 billion and GMIO of $1.4 billion; partially offset by decreases in GME of $2.4 billion and GMSA of $0.6 billion; (3) favorable vehicle pricing effect due primarily to GMIO of $0.8 billion, GMNA of $0.5 billion and GMSA of $0.5 billion; partially offset by (4) Other of $5.3 billion due primarily to unfavorable net foreign currency effect of $3.7 billion due primarily to the weakening of the Brazilian Real, Euro, Korean Won, Argentinian Peso and South African Zar against the U.S. Dollar; decreased revenues from powertrain and parts sales of $0.7 billion due to decreased volumes; reduction in favorable lease residual adjustments of $0.5 billion; decreased revenues from rental car leases of $0.2 billion; and decreased revenues due to the deconsolidation of VM Motori (VMM) in June 2011 of $0.1 billion.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 GM Financial Total sales and revenue increased due primarily to: (1) increased finance charge income of $0.3 billion, due to a larger portfolio; and (2) increased leased vehicles income of $0.2 billion due to the increased size of the leased asset portfolio.

Automotive Cost of Sales

 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change  Variance Due To
 2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Other Total
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Automotive cost of sales$134,925
 $140,236
 $5,311
 3.8%  $0.3
 $(2.3) $7.3
 $5.3
Automotive gross margin$17,167
 $10,059
 $7,108
 70.7%         

32



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change  Variance Due To
 2012 2011 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Other Total
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Automotive cost of sales$140,236
 $130,386
 $(9,850) (7.6)%  $(0.9) $(3.8) $(5.2) $(9.9)
Automotive gross margin$10,059
 $18,480
 $(8,421) (45.6)%         

The most significant element of our Automotive cost of sales is material cost which makes up approximately two-thirds of the total amount excluding adjustments. The remaining portion includes labor costs, depreciation and amortization, engineering, and policy, product warranty and recall campaigns.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Automotive cost of sales decreased due primarily to: (1) Other of $7.3 billion due to decreased impairment charges of $2.8 billion for long-lived assets and intangible assets; decreased pension settlement losses of $2.5 billion; the favorable effect of $1.3 billion resulting from the reversal of the Korea wage litigation accrual in 2013 compared to accruals related to the litigation in 2012; favorable net foreign currency effect of $0.9 billion due primarily to the weakening of the Brazilian Real against the U.S. Dollar; and reduction in unfavorable warranty and policy adjustments of $0.7 billion; partially offset by increased material and freight costs of $0.4 billion; increased costs of $0.2 billion related to parts and accessories sales; and net increased manufacturing expenses of $0.1 billion due primarily to new launch costs offset by reduced depreciation and amortization; (2) decreased costs related to decreased wholesale volumes; partially offset by (3) unfavorable vehicle mix due primarily to GMNA of $1.3 billion, GMSA of $0.4 billion and GMIO of $0.4 billion.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 Automotive cost of sales increased due primarily to: (1) Other of $5.2 billion due primarily to increased employee costs of $4.1 billion including increased pension settlement losses and decreased net pension and other postretirement benefits (OPEB) income and separation costs; impairment charges of $3.7 billion for long-lived assets and intangible assets; increased manufacturing expense of $1.4 billion due to new launches; increased policy and product warranty expense of $0.2 billion; partially offset by favorable net foreign currency effect of $3.3 billion due primarily to the weakening of the Brazilian Real, Euro, Korean Won, Argentinian Peso and South African Zar against the U.S. Dollar; decreased engineering expense of $0.5 billion; decreased costs of $0.3 billion related to powertrain and parts sales; and decreased costs of $0.1 billion due to the deconsolidation of VMM in June 2011; (2) unfavorable vehicle mix due primarily to GMNA of $1.3 billion, GMSA of $1.2 billion and GME of $0.8 billion; and (3) increased costs related to increased wholesale volumes due primarily to GMNA of $2.7 billion; partially offset by a decrease in GME of $1.9 billion.

GM Financial Operating and Other Expenses
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011Amount % Amount %
GM Financial operating and other expenses$2,448
 $1,207
 $785
 $1,241
 102.8% $422
 53.8%

In the year ended December 31, 2013 GM Financial operating and other expenses increased primarily due to: (1) an increase in interest expense of $0.4 billion due to higher average debt outstanding in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily resulting from the acquisition of Ally Financial’s international operations; (2) an increase in employee and other operating costs of $0.4 billion due primarily to the acquisition of Ally Financial’s international operations and an increase in headcount; (3) an increase in the provision for loan losses of $0.2 billion due primarily to growth of the consumer loan portfolio; and (4) an increase in depreciation expense of $0.2 billion due primarily to the increased size of the leased asset portfolio.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 GM Financial operating and other expenses increased primarily due to: (1) an increase in depreciation expense of $0.1 billion due to the increased size of the leased asset portfolio; (2) an increase in the provision for loan losses of $0.1 billion due primarily to growth of the consumer loan portfolio; (3) an increase in interest expense of $0.1 billion due to higher average debt outstanding in 2012 compared to 2011; and (4) an increase in employee costs of $0.1 billion due primarily to a 9% increase in employee headcount to support growth in GM Financial's business.

Automotive Selling, General and Administrative Expense

33



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011Amount % Amount %
Automotive selling, general and administrative expense$12,382
 $14,031
 $12,163
 $(1,649) (11.8)% $1,868
 15.4%

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Automotive selling, general and administrative expense decreased due primarily to: (1) impairment charges in GME for intangibles and long-lived assets of $1.8 billion that occurred in 2012 but not in 2013; and (2) a premium paid of $0.4 billion on the common stock purchase from the UST that occurred in 2012 but not in 2013; partially offset by (3) costs related to our plans to cease mainstream distribution of Chevrolet brand in Europe of $0.5 billion.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 Automotive selling, general and administrative expense increased due primarily to: (1) impairment charges in GME for intangibles and long-lived assets of $1.8 billion; and (2) a premium paid of $0.4 billion on the common stock purchase from the UST; partially offset by (3) favorable net foreign currency effect of $0.3 billion due to the weakening of certain currencies against the U.S. Dollar.

Goodwill Impairment Charges
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011Amount % Amount %
Goodwill impairment charges$541
 $27,145
 $1,286
 $(26,604) (98.0)% $25,859
 n.m.
__________
n.m. = not meaningful

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Goodwill impairment charges decreased as we recorded charges of $0.5 billion in GMIO in 2013 as compared to charges of $26.4 billion, $0.6 billion and $0.2 billion in GMNA, GME and GMIO in 2012. Refer to Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our Goodwill impairment charges.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 the Goodwill impairment charges increased as we recorded charges of $26.4 billion, $0.6 billion and $0.2 billion in GMNA, GME and GMIO in 2012 as compared to charges of $1.0 billion and $0.3 billion in GME and GMIO in 2011. Refer to Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our Goodwill impairment charges.

Automotive Interest Expense
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011Amount % Amount %
Automotive interest expense$334
 $489
 $540
 $(155) (31.7)% $(51) (9.4)%

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Automotive interest expense decreased due primarily to the redemption of GM Korea’s preferred shares in December 2012 and April 2013.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 the decrease in Automotive interest expense was insignificant, as the composition of our debt and related interest rates did not change significantly compared to 2011.

Interest Income and Other Non-Operating Income, net
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011Amount % Amount %
Interest income and other non-operating income, net$1,063
 $845
 $851
 $218
 25.8% $(6) (0.7)%

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Interest income and other non-operating income, net increased due primarily to: (1) a gain of $0.5 billion related to the sale of our Ally Financial investment in 2013; and (2) favorable effect of $0.4 billion due to a $0.2 billion gain on the sale of the PSA stock in 2013 compared to a $0.2 billion impairment charge in 2012; partially offset by (3)

34



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

unfavorable $0.2 billion foreign currency effect related to intercompany foreign currency denominated loans; (4) decreased insurance recoveries of $0.1 billion; (5) decreased interest income of $0.1 billion; (6) decreased gain on the sale of machinery and equipment of $0.1 billion; and (7) unfavorable effect of $0.1 billion gain on the purchase of GMAC de Venezuela in 2012 that did not occur in 2013.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 Interest income and other non-operating income, net remained flat due primarily to: (1) a gain of $0.3 billion related to the sale of our Ally Financial preferred stock in 2011 which did not recur in 2012; (2) an impairment charge of $0.2 billion related to our investment in PSA; (3) a charge of $0.1 billion to record General Motors Strasbourg S.A.S. (GMS) assets and liabilities to estimated fair value; (4) decreased interest income of $0.1 billion; and (5) derivative losses of $0.1 billion related to fair value adjustments; offset by (6) an impairment charge of $0.6 billion related to our investment in Ally Financial common stock in 2011 which did not recur in 2012; and (7) income related to insurance recoveries of $0.2 billion.

Gain (Loss) on Extinguishment of Debt
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011Amount % Amount %
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt$(212) $(250) $18
 $38
 15.2% $(268) n.m.
__________
n.m. = not meaningful

In the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 we recorded losses on extinguishment of debt primarily related to the early redemption of the GM Korea redeemable preferred shares.

Equity Income and Gain on Investments
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011Amount % Amount %
China joint ventures (China JVs)$1,763
 $1,521
 $1,511
 $242
 15.9% $10
 0.7 %
New Delphi (including gain on disposition)
 
 1,727
 
 n.m.
 (1,727) n.m.
Others47
 41
 (46) 6
 14.6% 87
 n.m.
Total equity income and gain on investments$1,810
 $1,562
 $3,192
 $248
 15.9% $(1,630) (51.1)%
__________
n.m. = not meaningful

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Equity income and gain on investments increased due primarily to a $0.2 billion increase in earnings of our China JVs.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 Equity income and gain on investments decreased due primarily to a $1.6 billion gain related to the sale of our Delphi Automotive LLP (New Delphi) Class A Membership Interests and related equity income for the year ended December 31, 2011 that did not recur for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011Amount % Amount %
Income tax expense (benefit)$2,127
 $(34,831) $(110) $36,958
 n.m. $(34,721) n.m.
__________
n.m. = not meaningful

In the year ended December 31, 2013 our effective tax rate was 28.5%. Income tax expense increased due primarily to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversal of $36.3 billion in the U.S. and Canada that occurred in 2012.


35



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

In the year ended December 31, 2012 income tax benefit increased due primarily to: (1) deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversals of $36.3 billion in the U.S. and Canada in 2012 as compared to $0.5 billion in Australia in 2011; and (2) change in U.S. federal tax elections which permitted us to record a tax benefit of $1.1 billion related to foreign tax credits; partially offset by (3) current year U.S. income tax provision of $1.4 billion; and (4) income tax allocation from Accumulated other comprehensive loss to Income tax expense (benefit) of $0.6 billion related to the U.S. salary pension plan.

Refer to Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our income tax expense (benefit).

Reconciliation of Consolidated, Automotive and GM Financial Segment Results

Non-GAAP Measures

Management believesuses earnings before interest and taxtaxes (EBIT)-adjusted provides meaningful supplemental information regardingto review the operating results of our automotive segments' operating resultssegments because it excludes interest income, interest expense and income taxes as well asand includes certain additional adjustments. SuchGM Financial uses income before income taxes-adjusted because management believes interest income and interest expense are part of operating results when assessing and measuring the operational and financial performance of the segment. Examples of adjustments to EBIT and GM Financial's income before income taxes include certain impairment charges related to goodwill, other long-lived assets underand investments; certain circumstances and certain investments, gains or losses on the settlement/extinguishment of obligationsobligations; and gains or losses on the sale of non-core investments. Refer to Note 25 to our consolidated financial statements for our reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measure under U.S. GAAP.

Management believes free cash flow anduses adjusted free cash flow provide meaningful supplemental information regardingto review the liquidity of our automotive operations and our ability to generate sufficient cash flow above those required in our business to sustain our operations. We measure adjusted free cash flow as cash flow from operations less capital expenditures. We measure adjusted free cash flow as free cash flowexpenditures adjusted for management actions, primarily related to strengthening our balance sheet, such as accrued interest on prepayments of debt and voluntary contributions to employee benefit plans. Refer to the “Liquidity” section of MD&A for our reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable financial measure under U.S. GAAP.

Management believesuses these non-GAAP measures in its financial and operational decision making processes, for internal reporting and as part of its forecasting and budgeting processes as they provide additional transparency of our core operations. These measures allow itmanagement to readily view operating trends, perform analytical comparisons and benchmark performance between periods and among geographic regions. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful in allowing for greater transparency of our core operations and are therefore used by management in its financial and operational decision-making. Management does not consider the excluded items when assessing and measuring the operational and financial performance of the organization, its management teams and when making decisions to allocate resources, such as capital investment, among business units and for internal reporting and as part of its forecasting and budgeting processes.

While management believes that these non-GAAP measures provide useful information, they are not operating measures under U.S. GAAP and there are limitations associated with their use. Our calculation of these non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies due to potential differences between companies in the method of calculation. As a result the use of these non-GAAP measures has limitations and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, other measures such as Net income, Net income attributable to stockholders or operating cash flow. Due to these limitations, these non-GAAP measures are used as supplements torelated U.S. GAAP measures.

Management believes income before income taxes provides meaningful supplemental information regarding GM Financial's operating results.Overview

Our strategic plan includes several major initiatives that we anticipate will help us achieve 9% to 10% margins on an EBIT-adjusted basis (EBIT-adjusted margins, calculated as EBIT-adjusted divided by Net sales and revenue) by early next decade: (1) earn customers for life by developing a strong product pipeline, leading the industry in quality and safety and delivering on our commitments; (2) lead the industry in product design, with our light-weighting and mixed material body structures and in leading edge technology, including the launch of 4G LTE in China and expansion of OnStar to Europe; (3) grow our brands, particularly the Cadillac brand in the U.S. and China; (4) continue our growth in China; (5) continue our growth of GM Financial usesas our captive automotive financing company; and (6) deliver core operating efficiencies by institutionalizing Operational Excellence. Our financial targets include the following:

Expected EBIT-adjusted and EBIT-adjusted margins improving in all automotive segments in 2015 due primarily to the following anticipated trends: (1) an approximately 3% increase in global industry vehicle sales; (2) improved mix of full-size SUVs and full-size pick-up trucks; and (3) lower overall restructuring costs; partially offset by (4) higher marketing and engineering costs; and (5) unfavorable foreign currency effects;

Anticipated adjusted automotive free cash flow will be relatively flat in 2015 compared to 2014;

Forecasted consolidated EBIT-adjusted margins of 9% to 10% by the 2020s;

Expected EBIT-adjusted margins of 10% in GMNA in 2016, which we anticipate will be driven by product launches, disciplined pricing and a separate measurefocus on fixed costs;

An anticipated return to profitability in GME in 2016 driven by investments in our product portfolio, a revised brand strategy and reducing material, development and production costs assuming Europe does not suffer another recession;

Expected continued improvement of our results in GMIO (excluding the results of our China JVs) through our emerging market product portfolio, improvements in brand strategy and dealer networks, cost structure and sourcing over the medium term;

Continued strong net income margins at our China JVs, with plans to invest approximately $14 billion in China through 2018 and increase vehicle sales volumes by nearly 40% by 2018;


22



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Expected continued improvement of our core operations in GMSA through product launches and material and logistics optimization, with a long-term objective of single digit EBIT-adjusted margins; and

An anticipated increase of GM Financial’s support of the sale of new GM vehicles around the world through a comprehensive suite of financing products, including continuing on the path towards full global captive capability.

Automotive Summary and Outlook

Our consolidated Net income decreased from $5.3 billion to $4.0 billion. Notwithstanding this decrease we had strong financial results in 2014 excluding the impact of recall campaign and courtesy transportation charges. Performance of GMNA met our expectations, while GME and GMIO outperformed our expectations. However, we experienced weaker performance in GMSA due to the challenging environment in Venezuela, Brazil and Argentina.

As more fully described in the “GM North America” section of MD&A we recorded charges of approximately $2.9 billion in Automotive cost of sales relating to recall campaigns and courtesy transportation in the year ended December 31, 2014, of which over 86% was recorded in GMNA.

In the three months ended June 30, 2014 we announced the creation of a compensation program (the Program) to compensate accident victims who died or suffered physical injury (or their families) as a result of a faulty ignition switch related to the 2.6 million vehicles recalled under the Ignition Switch Recall. Refer to the “GM North America” section of MD&A for additional information on the Ignition Switch Recall. It is important to our company that we reach everyone through this Program who has been impacted. The Program is being administered by an independent program administrator. The independent administrator has established a protocol that defines the eligibility requirements to participate in the Program. There is no cap on the amount of payments that can be made to claimants under the Program.

In the three months ended June 30, 2014 we recorded $0.4 billion in Automotive selling, general and administrative expense in Corporate which represents our best estimate of amounts that may be paid under the Program. The amount was treated as an adjustment for EBIT-adjusted reporting purposes. However, it is reasonably possible that the liability could exceed our recorded amount by approximately $0.2 billion. The most significant estimates affecting the amount recorded include the number of participants that have eligible claims related to death and physical injury, which also contemplates the severity of injury, the length of hospital stays and related compensation amounts and the number of people who actually elect to participate in the Program. Our estimate is subject to significant uncertainties, as programs of this nature are highly unusual and each eligible claim will have a unique underlying fact pattern. While we do not anticipate material changes to our current estimate, it is possible that material changes could occur if actual eligible claims and the related compensation amounts differ from this estimate. The Program accepted claims from August 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015. Payments to eligible claimants began in the fourth quarter 2014 and will continue through the first half of 2015. Accident victims (or their families) could choose not to participate in the Program and pursue litigation against us. At January 30, 2015 the Program has received 3,810 claims and the independent program administrator has determined 128 claims to be eligible for payment under the Program. Remaining claims are either under review, deficient awaiting further documentation or deemed ineligible. Based on currently available information we believe our accrual at December 31, 2014 is adequate to cover the estimated costs under the Program. At January 30, 2015 we have paid $93 million to eligible claimants under the Program. Accident victims that accept a payment under the Program agree to settle all claims against GM related to the accident.

We analyze the results of our automotive operations because management believes interest incomebusiness through our four geographically-based segments:

GMNA

Automotive industry volume has continued to grow in North America. In 2014 U.S. industry light vehicle sales for the calendar year were 16.5 million units, up from 15.6 million units in 2013. In January 2015 we announced that we expect 2015 industry light vehicle sales to be between 16.5 and interest expense are part17.0 million units.
In the year ended December 31, 2014 our U.S. retail vehicle sales increased at a rate approximately 0.7 percentage points less than industry sales. As a result, our U.S. market share decreased by 0.1 percentage points. U.S. market share for both Chevrolet and Cadillac decreased, while GMC and Buick increased.
GMNA continued to generate increases in average transaction prices (ATP) in U.S. According to J.D. Power PIN estimates, in the year ended December 31, 2014 we achieved record ATP in the U.S. on the strength of operating results when assessingnew products such as large pick-ups and measuring

23



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUVs. Contributing to the operational and financial performancerecord ATP, our U.S. incentive spending as a percentage of ATP increased by 0.1 percentage points, while industry spending increased by 0.4 percentage points compared to the prior year.
The first deliveries of the segment.new 2015 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon mid-size pick-ups occurred in September 2014. We have announced plans to add a third shift at our Wentzville, Mo. assembly plant in early 2015 to meet expected demand for both mid-size pick-ups and full-size vans.
Customer safety and satisfaction were the major reasons for the recall of approximately 36 million vehicles announced during 2014. These recalls included: (1) approximately 2.6 million vehicles to repair ignition switches that could result in a loss of electrical power under certain circumstances that may prevent front airbags from deploying in the event of a crash (accident victims who died or suffered physical injury associated with these vehicles (or their families) may be eligible to participate in a compensation program, as more fully described in Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements) and to fix ignition lock cylinders that could allow removal of the ignition key while the engine is running, leading to possible rollaway or crash; (2) approximately 1.9 million vehicles to replace either the power steering motor, the steering column, the power steering motor control unit or a combination of the steering column and the power steering motor control unit as the electric power steering could fail under certain circumstances; (3) approximately 1.3 million vehicles prone to non-deployment of the side impact restraints if vehicles are not serviced when the Service Air Bag warning light is illuminated; (4) approximately 2.7 million vehicles to modify the brake lamp wiring harness that could have corrosion develop due to micro-vibration; (5) approximately 1.5 million vehicles to replace front safety lap belt cables that could fatigue and separate over time; (6) approximately 1.4 million vehicles to replace the shift cable that could wear out over time resulting in mismatches of the gear position indicated by the shift lever; (7) approximately 12.1 million vehicles to rework or replace ignition keys because the ignition switch may move out of the “run” position which may impact power steering and power braking and, depending on timing of the key movement relative to the activation of the sensing algorithm of a crash event, may result in airbags not deploying; (8) approximately 1.1 million vehicles to repair a loose battery cable that could impact vehicle warning systems; (9) approximately 0.7 million vehicles to repair ignition mechanisms where the ignition key could be pulled out while the vehicle is in the run position; (10) approximately 0.6 million vehicles to replace the wave plate in all vehicles with 6T70 and 6T75 transmissions which could crack under certain circumstances; and (11) approximately 10.1 million vehicles for other matters. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 we recorded charges of approximately $1.1 billion and $2.4 billion primarily for the estimated costs of parts and labor to repair these vehicles and for courtesy transportation. The cost of the vehicles recalled in the six months ended December 31, 2014 were comprehended in the June 30, 2014 catch-up adjustment of $0.9 billion associated with a change in estimate for previously sold vehicles. Refer to Note 1 and Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for more detail related to the catch-up adjustment. Total Net sales and revenue for GMNA have increased for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to prior year by 6.4%. It is difficult to determine the impact, if any, on current or future Net sales and revenue due to our recent recall activity. Of the approximately 36 million vehicles subject to recall, approximately 63% of the vehicles and 65% of the costs involve vehicles we no longer produce or sell. We began repairing vehicles in early April 2014 and we have produced sufficient parts to have the ability to repair all vehicles impacted by the Ignition Switch Recall. Refer to the "GM North America" section of MD&A for additional information on all of the recalls we announced in 2014.

In the year ending December 31, 2015 we expect an increase in EBIT-adjusted and EBIT-adjusted margins due primarily to: (1) a slight increase in U.S. industry vehicle sales; and (2) full year production of full-size SUVs; partially offset by (3) increased engineering and marketing costs.

The following tables summarizeUAW contract we entered into in September 2011 expires in September 2015.

GME

The automotive industry conditions in Europe remain challenging due to economic uncertainty resulting from weak gross domestic growth, high unemployment and vehicle production overcapacity. Despite such conditions, automotive industry sales to retail and fleet customers began to improve in the reconciliationthree months ended December 31, 2013 compared to the corresponding period in 2012. This trend continued in 2014 with industry sales to retail and fleet customers of 19 million vehicles representing a 1.8% increase compared to the corresponding period in 2013.

Our European operations are benefiting from this trend and continue to show signs of improvement underscored by further improvement in our Opel and Vauxhall market share in the year ended December 31, 2014, which builds on our first market share increase in 14 years in 2013. This market share increase was partially driven by the success of the recently launched Opel Mokka.

We continue to implement various strategic actions to strengthen our operations and increase our competitiveness. The key actions include investments in our product portfolio including the next generation Opel Astra and Corsa, a revised brand strategy

24



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

and reducing material, development and production costs, including restructuring activities. The success of these actions will depend on a combination of our ability to execute and external factors which are outside of our control.

We continue to assess additional strategic actions across the region as a result of significant volume pricing and foreign exchange pressures in certain markets, which may result in additional restructuring or rationalization actions. These actions, if implemented, may result in impairment and other charges. The determination of the amount of these charges is subject to significant uncertainty and highly dependent on finalization of our strategic assessments.

Our restructuring activities include our effort to rationalize our manufacturing footprint in GME whereby we reached agreement with the labor union in Germany to terminate all vehicle and transmission production at our Bochum, Germany facility at the end of 2014. Affected employees are eligible for a voluntary restructuring separation program. Restructuring charges were recorded primarily through the end of 2014. Refer to Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

In the year ended December 31, 2014 we performed a strategic assessment of our Russian operations as a result of a significant deterioration in sales volumes due to challenging market conditions and deterioration in the Russian Ruble. Our review indicated that the existing long-lived assets and certain investments in our Russian operations were not recoverable. As a result we recorded impairment charges of $0.2 billion in Automotive cost of sales which was treated as an adjustment for EBIT-adjusted reporting purposes. Industry and economic conditions in Russia remain volatile and we continue to evaluate and execute various strategic actions to improve our operations in a difficult environment.

We expect the European automotive segmentsindustry to continue to moderately improve and we expect to be profitable in GME in 2016.

In the year ending December 31, 2015 we expect an increase in EBIT-adjusted and GM Financial's income before income taxesEBIT-adjusted margins due primarily to: (1) lower restructuring costs; partially offset by (2) higher engineering, marketing and depreciation and amortization cost.

GMIO

We are addressing many of the challenges in our GMIO operations and continue to strategically assess the manner in which we operate in certain countries within GMIO. In 2013 we announced the withdrawal of the Chevrolet brand from Western and Central Europe and the ceasing of manufacturing and significant reduction of engineering operations in Australia by 2017 and incurred impairment and other charges in 2013 and 2014. We continue to execute these plans and within the financial impact that we projected. As we continue to assess our performance throughout the region, additional restructuring and rationalization actions may be required and may be material.

In the three months ended December 31, 2014 due to a significant decrease in domestic sales driven by political unrest and a lack of consumer confidence domestically as well as ongoing weakness and trade challenges in several export markets we performed a recoverability test of our real and personal property assets in our Thailand operations. As a result we recorded impairment charges of $0.2 billion in Automotive cost of sales which was treated as an adjustment for EBIT-adjusted reporting purposes.

To address the significant industry, market share, pricing and foreign exchange pressures in the region, we continue to focus on product portfolio enhancements, manufacturing footprint rationalization, increased local sourcing of parts, cost structure reductions, as well as brand and dealer network improvements which we expect to favorably impact the region over the medium term. However, with the significant reduction in wholesale volumes and forward pricing pressures, we tested certain long-lived assets for impairment and additional testing may occur in the near term. Determining whether long-lived assets need to be tested for impairment, whether recorded amounts are recoverable and the estimate of impairment and other charges, if any, is subject to significant uncertainty and highly dependent on finalization of our strategic assessments.

In the year ending December 31, 2015 we expect an increase in EBIT-adjusted and EBIT-adjusted margins due primarily to: (1) improved profitability at our China JVs; (2) a flat to slight increase in industry vehicle sales; (3) improved product mix in the Middle East; and (4) improved cost performance; partially offset by (5) higher restructuring costs.

In China we are expecting an increase in industry vehicle sales with a modest increase in market share coupled with new vehicle launches and a full year of the 2014 launches.

GMSA


25



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

In the three months ended March 31, 2014 we recorded devaluation charges of $0.4 billion related to a change in the exchange rate we use for remeasuring our Venezuelan subsidiaries’ non-U.S. Dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities from the Venezuela official exchange rate to the rate determined by an auction process conducted by Venezuela’s Complementary System of Foreign Currency Administration (SICAD I). In addition to currency controls already in place the Venezuelan government announced pricing controls that, taken with other initiatives, require us to closely monitor and consider our ability to maintain a controlling financial interest in our Venezuelan subsidiaries. Refer to the "GM South America" section of MD&A for additional information.

In the year ended December 31, 2014 we recorded a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.2 billion primarily related to prepayment of unsecured debt in Brazil.

Based on the results of our annual goodwill impairment tests we recorded goodwill impairment charges of $0.1 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014 which was treated as an adjustment for EBIT-adjusted reporting purposes.

In the year ending December 31, 2015 we expect an increase in EBIT-adjusted and EBIT-adjusted margins due primarily to: (1) a slight improvement in market share primarily in Brazil; (2) improved product and country mix; and (3) improved pricing; partially offset by (4) higher marketing, labor, material and logistics costs. Continued foreign currency volatility will also affect our results in 2015.

Corporate

On December 31, 2014 we redeemed all of our shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding at a redemption price equal to the aggregate liquidation amount, including accumulated dividends, of $3.9 billion. The difference of $0.8 billion between the carrying amount and the consideration paid was recorded as a reduction to Net income attributable to stockholders and provides supplemental detailcommon stockholders.

At December 31, 2014 our European businesses had deferred tax asset valuation allowances of $4.9 billion. As a result of the adjustments,changes in our European operating structure and improving financial performance in certain jurisdictions, we are experiencing positive evidence trends in certain operations. If these operations generate profits and taxable income in the future, it is reasonably possible our conclusion regarding the need for full valuation allowances could change, resulting in the reversal of significant portions of the valuation allowances. In the quarter in which significant valuation allowances are presented netreversed, we will record a material tax benefit reflecting the reversal, which could result in lower than expected or negative effective tax rate for both the quarter and full year.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial Summary and Outlook

GM Financial is currently seeking to expand its prime lending programs in North America and anticipates that prime lending will become an increasing percentage of noncontrolling interests (dollarsthe consumer portfolio balance over time. We believe that offering a comprehensive suite of financing products will generate incremental sales of our vehicles, drive incremental GM Financial earnings and help support our sales throughout economic cycles.GM Financial completed the acquisitions of Ally Financial's automotive finance and financial services businesses in millions):Europe and Latin America during 2013. On January 2, 2015 GM Financial completed its acquisition of Ally Financial's 40% equity interest in SAIC-GMAC in China. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $1.0 billion, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. Also on January 2, 2015 GM Financial sold a 5% equity interest in SAIC-GMAC to Shanghai Automotive Group Finance Company Ltd. (SAICFC), a current shareholder of SAIC-GMAC, for proceeds of approximately $120 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. As a result of these transactions GM indirectly owns 45% of SAIC-GMAC.

In January 2015 we announced GM Financial will become the exclusive U.S. lease provider for Buick-GMC dealers in February 2015 and is targeting March 2015 for Cadillac dealers. U.S. lease exclusivity with Chevrolet dealers is under consideration.

In the year ending December 31, 2015 we expect income before income taxes-adjusted to remain consistent with 2014 because our near-term financial results will be impacted by additional provisions on loan losses and interest expense resulting from the growth of the business.

Consolidated Results

We review changes in our results of operations under four categories: volume, mix, price and other. Volume measures the impact of changes in wholesale vehicle volumes driven by industry volume, market share and changes in dealer stock levels. Mix measures the impact of changes to the regional portfolio due to product, model, trim, country and option penetration in current year wholesale

26



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

vehicle volumes. Price measures the impact of changes related to Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price and various sales allowances. Other includes primarily: (1) material and freight; (2) costs including manufacturing, engineering, advertising, administrative and selling and policy and warranty expense; (3) foreign exchange; and (4) non-vehicle related automotive revenues and costs as well as equity income or loss from our nonconsolidated affiliates.

36Total Net Sales and Revenue
 Years Ended December 31,  Variance Due To
2014 2013 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
GMNA$101,199
 $95,099
 $6,100
 6.4 %  $1.3
 $1.2
 $3.4
 $0.3
GME22,235
 21,962
 273
 1.2 %  $0.2
 $0.7
 $
 $(0.5)
GMIO14,392
 18,411
 (4,019) (21.8)%  $(4.6) $0.4
 $0.7
 $(0.4)
GMSA13,115
 16,478
 (3,363) (20.4)%  $(2.4) $0.1
 $1.1
 $(2.1)
Corporate and eliminations151
 142
 9
 6.3 %        $
Automotive151,092
 152,092
 (1,000) (0.7)%  $(5.6) $2.3
 $5.1
 $(2.8)
GM Financial4,837
 3,335
 1,502
 45.0 %        $1.5
Total net sales and revenue$155,929
 $155,427
 $502
 0.3 %  $(5.6) $2.3
 $5.1
 $(1.3)

 Years Ended December 31,  Variance Due To
2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
GMNA$95,099
 $89,910
 $5,189
 5.8 %  $1.7
 $1.3
 $1.9
 $0.3
GME21,962
 23,055
 (1,093) (4.7)%  $(1.1) $
 $(0.2) $0.2
GMIO18,411
 20,588
 (2,177) (10.6)%  $(0.8) $(0.2) $(0.5) $(0.7)
GMSA16,478
 16,700
 (222) (1.3)%  $
 $0.6
 $0.9
 $(1.7)
Corporate and eliminations142
 42
 100
 n.m.
        $0.1
Automotive152,092
 150,295
 1,797
 1.2 %  $(0.2) $1.7
 $2.2
 $(1.9)
GM Financial3,335
 1,961
 1,374
 70.1 %        $1.4
Total net sales and revenue$155,427
 $152,256
 $3,171
 2.1 %  $(0.2) $1.7
 $2.2
 $(0.5)
________
n.m. = not meaningful

Refer to the regional sections of the MD&A for additional information.

Automotive Cost of Sales
 Years Ended December 31,  Variance Due To
 2014 2013 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Other
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
GMNA$89,371
 $81,404
 $(7,967) (9.8)%  $(0.8) $(0.9) $(6.2)
GME21,712
 20,824
 (888) (4.3)%  $(0.1) $(0.5) $(0.3)
GMIO14,009
 17,599
 3,590
 20.4 %  $3.7
 $(0.5) $0.4
GMSA12,736
 15,221
 2,485
 16.3 %  $1.9
 $(0.2) $0.8
Corporate and eliminations254
 (123) (377) n.m.
      $(0.4)
Total automotive cost of sales$138,082
 $134,925
 $(3,157) (2.3)%  $4.7
 $(2.0) $(5.8)
________
n.m. = not meaningful

27



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Automotive           
EBIT-adjusted           
GMNA$7,461
 97.1 % $6,470
 90.9 % $6,779
 88.2 %
GME(844) (11.0)% (1,939) (27.2)% (1,041) (13.6)%
GMIO1,230
 16.0 % 2,528
 35.5 % 2,232
 29.1 %
GMSA327
 4.3 % 457
 6.4 % 158
 2.1 %
Corporate and eliminations(494) (6.4)% (400) (5.6)% (446) (5.8)%
Total automotive EBIT-adjusted7,680
 100.0 % 7,116
 100.0 % 7,682
 100.0 %
Adjustments(790)   (36,106)   861
  
Corporate interest income249
   343
   455
  
Automotive interest expense338
   489
   540
  
Loss on extinguishment of debt212
   250
   
  
Automotive Financing           
GM Financial income before income taxes898
   744
   622
  
Adjustments(15)   
   
  
Consolidated           
Eliminations1
   (1)   
  
Income tax expense (benefit)2,127
   (34,831)   (110)  
Net income attributable to stockholders$5,346
   $6,188
   $9,190
  
 Years Ended December 31,  Variance Due To
 2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Other
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
GMNA$81,404
 $79,907
 $(1,497) (1.9)%  $(1.2) $(1.3) $1.0
GME20,824
 26,497
 5,673
 21.4 %  $1.0
 $(0.4) $5.1
GMIO17,599
 18,589
 990
 5.3 %  $0.6
 $(0.2) $0.7
GMSA15,221
 15,299
 78
 0.5 %  $(0.1) $(0.4) $0.5
Corporate and eliminations(123) (56) 67
 119.6 %      $0.1
Total automotive cost of sales$134,925
 $140,236
 $5,311
 3.8 %  $0.3
 $(2.3) $7.3

Our automotive operations interestThe most significant element of our Automotive cost of sales is material cost which makes up approximately two-thirds of the total amount. The remaining portion includes labor costs, depreciation and income taxes are recorded centrallyamortization, engineering, and policy, product warranty and recall campaigns.

Refer to the regional sections of the MD&A for additional information on volume and mix.

In the year ended December 31, 2014 unfavorable Other was due primarily to: (1) increased recall campaign and courtesy transportation charges, including catch-up adjustments, of $3.5 billion; (2) increased material and freight cost including new launches of $2.7 billion; (3) unfavorable effect of $0.7 billion resulting from the reversal of the Korea wage litigation accrual in Corporate; therefore, there are no reconciling items2013 in GMIO; (4) restructuring charges of $0.5 billion related to the Bochum plant closing in GME; (5) increased depreciation on equipment on operating lease related to daily rental vehicles of $0.3 billion; and (6) charges related to flood damage of $0.1 billion; partially offset by (7) favorable net foreign currency effect of $1.0 billion due primarily to the weakening of the Brazilian Real, Russian Ruble, Euro and Canadian Dollar (CAD) against the U.S. Dollar; partially offset by the Venezuela Bolivar Fuerte (BsF) devaluation; and (8) favorable intangible asset amortization of $0.6 billion.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 favorable Other was due primarily to: (1) decreased impairment charges of $2.8 billion for our automotive operating segments between EBIT-adjustedlong-lived assets and Net income attributableintangible assets; (2) decreased pension settlement losses of $2.5 billion in GMNA; (3) the favorable effect of $1.3 billion resulting from the reversal of the Korea wage litigation accrual in 2013 compared to stockholders.accruals related to the litigation in 2012; (4) favorable net foreign currency effect of $0.9 billion due primarily to the weakening of the Brazilian Real against the U.S. Dollar; and (5) a reduction in unfavorable warranty and policy adjustments of $0.7 billion; partially offset by (6) increased material and freight costs of $0.4 billion; (7) increased costs of $0.2 billion related to parts and accessories sales; and (8) net increased manufacturing expenses of $0.1 billion due primarily to new launch costs offset by reduced depreciation and amortization.

Automotive Selling, General and Administrative Expense
 Year Ended December 31, 2013
 GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Total
Impairment charges of property and intangible assets$
 $
 $(774) $
 $
 $(774)
Costs related to our plans to cease mainstream distribution of Chevrolet brand in Europe
 
 (621) 
 
 (621)
Reversal of GM Korea wage litigation accrual
 
 577
 
 
 577
Gain on sale of equity investment in Ally Financial
 
 
 
 483
 483
Goodwill impairment charges
 
 (442) 
 
 (442)
Venezuela currency devaluation
 
 
 (162) 
 (162)
Gain on sale of equity investment in PSA
 152
 
 
 
 152
Noncontrolling interests related to redemption of the GM Korea mandatorily redeemable preferred shares
 
 67
 
 
 67
Pension settlement charges(56) 
 
 
 
 (56)
Charges related to PSA product development agreement(49) 
 
 
 
 (49)
Income related to insurance recoveries5
 1
 24
 5
 
 35
Total adjustments to automotive EBIT$(100) $153
 $(1,169) $(157) $483
 $(790)
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change
   
 2014 2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) % Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %
Automotive selling, general and administrative expense$12,158
 $12,382
 $14,031
 $224
 1.8% $1,649
 11.8%

In the year ended December 31, 2014 Automotive selling, general and administrative expense decreased due primarily to: (1) decreased expenses of $0.7 billion related to the withdrawal of the Chevrolet brand from Europe, including dealer restructuring costs and intangible asset impairment charges in 2013, coupled with cost reductions in 2014; and (2) favorable advertising expense of $0.2 billion in GMNA due primarily to reduced media spend; partially offset by (3) expense related to the Ignition Switch Compensation Program of $0.4 billion; and (4) legal and other costs related to the Ignition Switch Recall of $0.4 billion.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Automotive selling, general and administrative expense decreased due primarily to: (1) impairment charges in GME for intangibles and long-lived assets of $1.8 billion recorded in 2012; and (2) a premium paid of $0.4 billion on the common stock purchase from the UST in 2012; partially offset by (3) costs related to our plans to cease mainstream distribution of Chevrolet brand in Europe of $0.5 billion.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

37
28



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Year Ended December 31, 2012
 GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Total
Goodwill impairment charges$(26,399) $(590) $(132) $
 $
 $(27,121)
Impairment charges of property
 (3,714) 
 
 
 (3,714)
Pension settlement charges(2,662) 
 
 
 
 (2,662)
Impairment charges of intangible assets
 (1,755) 
 
 
 (1,755)
Premium paid to purchase our common stock from the UST
 
 
 
 (402) (402)
GM Korea wage litigation accrual
 
 (336) 
 
 (336)
Impairment charge related to investment in PSA
 (220) 
 
 
 (220)
Income related to insurance recoveries9
 7
 112
 27
 
 155
Charge to record GMS assets and liabilities to estimated fair value
 (119) 
 
 
 (119)
Noncontrolling interests related to redemption of the GM Korea mandatorily redeemable preferred shares
 
 68
 
 
 68
Total adjustments to automotive EBIT$(29,052) $(6,391) $(288) $27
 $(402) $(36,106)
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change
   
 2014 2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) % Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %
Income tax expense (benefit)$228
 $2,127
 $(34,831) $1,899
 89.3% $36,958
 n.m.
________
n.m. = not meaningful

In the year ended December 31, 2014 income tax expense decreased due primarily to a decrease in pre-tax income related to U.S. recall-related costs, a reduction in pre-tax losses in jurisdictions with full valuation allowances and other tax expense favorable items.
 Year Ended December 31, 2011
 GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Total
Gain on sale of our New Delphi Class A Membership Interests$1,645
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,645
Goodwill impairment charges
 (1,016) (258) 
 
 (1,274)
Gain related to HCT settlement749
 
 
 
 
 749
Impairment related to Ally Financial common stock
 
 
 
 (555) (555)
Gain on sale of Ally Financial preferred stock
 
 
 
 339
 339
Charges related to GM India
 
 (106) 
 
 (106)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
 
 
 63
 
 63
Total adjustments to automotive EBIT$2,394
 $(1,016) $(364) $63
 $(216) $861

In the year ended December 31, 2013 income tax expense increased due primarily to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversal of $36.3 billion in the U.S. and Canada that occurred in 2012.

Refer to Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to our income tax expense (benefit).

GM North America
Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change  Variance Due ToYears Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change  Variance Due To
2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other Total2014 2013 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other
(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$95,099
 $89,910
 $5,189
 5.8%  $1.7
 $1.3
 $1.9
 $0.3
 $5.2
$101,199
 $95,099
 $6,100
 6.4 %  $1.3
 $1.2
 $3.4
 $0.3
EBIT-adjusted$7,461
 $6,470
 $991
 15.3%  $0.5
 $
 $1.9
 $(1.4) $1.0
$6,603
 $7,461
 $(858) (11.5)%  $0.4
 $0.3
 $3.4
 $(5.0)
(Vehicles in thousands)             (Vehicles in thousands)           
Wholesale vehicle sales3,276
 3,207
 69
 2.2%           3,320
 3,276
 44
 1.3 %         

Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change  Variance Due ToYears Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change  Variance Due To
2012 2011 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other Total2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other
(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$89,910
 $85,991
 $3,919
 4.6 %  $3.8
 $0.7
 $0.5
 $(1.1) $3.9
$95,099
 $89,910
 $5,189
 5.8%  $1.7
 $1.3
 $1.9
 $0.3
EBIT-adjusted$6,470
 $6,779
 $(309) (4.6)%  $1.1
 $(0.6) $0.5
 $(1.3) $(0.3)$7,461
 $6,470
 $991
 15.3%  $0.5
 $
 $1.9
 $(1.4)
(Vehicles in thousands)             (Vehicles in thousands)           
Wholesale vehicle sales3,207
 3,053
 154
 5.0 %           3,276
 3,207
 69
 2.2%         

GMNA Total Net Sales and Revenue

38



TableIn the year ended December 31, 2014 Total net sales and revenue increased due primarily to: (1) favorable vehicle pricing related to full-size pick-ups and full-size SUVs; (2) increased wholesale volumes due to full-size pick-ups, full-size SUVs and the Chevrolet Colorado, Corvette and Malibu, partially offset by decreases of Contentsthe Chevrolet Impala, Captiva and Cruze; (3) favorable mix due to full-size pick-ups, full-size SUVs and the Chevrolet Corvette and Impala; and (4) favorable Other of $0.3 billion due primarily to increased operating lease revenue related to daily rental vehicles sold with guaranteed repurchase obligations and increased parts and accessories sales, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency effect related primarily to the weakening of the Canadian Dollar and Mexican Peso against the U.S. Dollar.
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


In the year ended December 31, 2013 Total net sales and revenue increased due primarily to: (1) favorable vehicle pricing related to recent vehicle launches such as the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra; (2) increased wholesale volumes due to increased industry demand and successful recent vehicle launches such as the Buick Encore, Cadillac ATS, Chevrolet Silverado Chevroletand Spark and GMC Sierra; and (3) favorable vehicle mix related to improving market segments containing higher revenue vehicles including crossovers and trucks.


In the year ended December 31, 2012 Total net sales and revenue increased due primarily to: (1) increased wholesale volumes due to increased industry demand and successful recent vehicle launches such as the Buick Verano, Cadillac ATS, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Sonic and Chevrolet Spark; (2) favorable vehicle mix due to increases in Cadillac ATS, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra; and (3) favorable vehicle pricing related to recent vehicle launches such as Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia and Buick Enclave; partially offset by (4) Other of $1.1 billion due primarily to reduction in favorable lease residual adjustments of $0.5 billion; and unfavorable net foreign currency effect of $0.2 billion due to the weakening of the Canadian Dollar (CAD) and Mexican Peso against the U.S. Dollar.
29



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

GMNA EBIT-Adjusted

The most significant factors which influence GMNA's profitability are industry volume (primarily U.S. seasonally adjusted annual rate) and market share. While not as significant as industry volume and market share, another factor affecting profitability is the relative mix of vehicles (cars, trucks, crossovers) sold. Variable profit is a key indicator of product profitability. Variable profit is defined as revenue less material cost, freight, the variable component of manufacturing expense, and policy and warranty expense. Vehicles with higher selling prices generally have higher variable profit. Trucks, crossover vehicles and cars sold in the U.S. currently have a variable profit of approximately 160%, 90% and 40% respectively of our portfolio on a weighted-average basis. Crossover vehicles' variable profits are

In the year ended December 31, 2014 EBIT-adjusted decreased due primarily to: (1) unfavorable Other of $5.0 billion due primarily to an increase in linerecall campaign actions and recall related charges of $2.3 billion, increased material and freight costs including new launches of $2.8 billion, and increased engineering expense of $0.5 billion, partially offset by increased daily rental vehicles sold with guaranteed repurchase obligations and reduced advertising expenses; partially offset by (2) favorable vehicle pricing related to full-size pick-ups and full-size SUVs; (3) increased wholesale volumes due to full-size pick-ups, full-size SUVs and the overall portfolio on a weighted-average basis,Chevrolet Colorado, Corvette and cars are approximately 50%Malibu, partially offset by decreases of the portfolio on a weighted-average basis.Chevrolet Impala, Captiva and Cruze; and (4) favorable mix due to full-size pick-ups, full-size SUVs and the Chevrolet Corvette and Impala.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 EBIT-adjusted increased due primarily to: (1) favorable vehicle pricing;pricing related to recent vehicle launches such as the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra; and (2) increased wholesale volumes;volumes due to increased industry demand and successful recent vehicle launches such as the Buick Encore, Cadillac ATS and Chevrolet Silverado; partially offset by (3) unfavorable Other of $1.4 billion due primarily due to increased material and freight costs including new launches of $1.1 billion;billion, increased manufacturing expense including new launches of $0.3 billion;billion, increased engineering expense of $0.3 billion;billion and increased depreciation and amortization expense of $0.2 billion, partially offset by a reduction in unfavorable warranty and policy adjustments of $0.6 billion.

Recall Campaigns

In the year ended December 31, 2012 EBIT-adjusted decreased due primarily to: (1) unfavorable2014 we experienced a significant increase in the number of vehicles subject to recall in North America resulting in incremental charges for the estimated costs of parts and labor to repair these vehicles and courtesy transportation for certain recalls. There were approximately 36 million vehicles subject to recalls announced during this period. This included approximately 10 million vehicles subject to multiple recalls and reflects the results of our ongoing comprehensive safety review, additional engineering analysis and our overall commitment to customer satisfaction.

In the three months ended March 31, 2014 we announced a recall to repair ignition switches in vehicles that we are no longer producing that under certain circumstances could result in a loss of electrical power that may prevent front airbags from deploying in the event of a crash. It was originally estimated that approximately 800,000 vehicles were equipped with ignition switches needing repair. These vehicles include model years 2005–2007 Chevrolet Cobalt, 2007 Pontiac G5 and 2005–2006 Pursuit. In the three months ended December 31, 2013 we recorded approximately $40 million in Automotive cost of sales to cover the repairs as these costs were considered probable and estimable at that time. In the three months ended March 31, 2014 we expanded this recall by approximately 1.8 million additional vehicles for the same issue. These vehicles, consisting of model years 2008–2010 Chevrolet Cobalt, model years 2006–2011 HHR, model years 2008–2010 Pontiac G5, model years 2006–2010 Solstice, model years 2003–2007 Saturn ION and model years 2007–2010 Sky, were not included in the initial recall. In the three months ended March 31, 2014 we recorded approximately $90 million in Automotive cost of sales to repair these vehicles and approximately $270 million in Automotive cost of sales to provide courtesy transportation to owners of affected vehicles. These recalls, relating to ignition switches, are collectively referred to as the “Ignition Switch Recall.” Refer to Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for litigation associated with the Ignition Switch Recall. A second repair was added to these vehicles as a result of the comprehensive review described below to fix ignition lock cylinders that could allow removal of the ignition key while the engine is running, leading to possible rollaway or crash. In the three months ended March 31, 2014 we recorded approximately $320 million in Automotive cost of sales to repair ignition lock cylinders.

In response to these developments we conducted an in-depth review of the Ignition Switch Recall and our overall recall processes. We hired a former U.S. Attorney to conduct an internal investigation of the Ignition Switch Recall and to provide recommendations to improve our recall processes. Pursuant to the investigation a report was provided to us in the three months ended June 30, 2014. The investigation report made a series of recommendations in eight major areas. We intend to act or have acted on each of the recommendations. After reviewing the investigation report, we made a number of personnel decisions. Fifteen individuals identified in the investigation report are no longer with the Company. Five additional individuals were disciplined. Prior to the receipt of the

30



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

investigation report we began the process of adding over 100 new safety investigators and related specialists in North America alone allowing us to bolster capacity and capability in identifying potential emerging issues and conducting product investigations, launched a Speak Up for Safety program encouraging employees to report potential safety issues quickly and restructured the safety decision-making process to raise safety issues to the highest levels of the Company. These measures are in addition to our creation and appointment of a new Global Vice President of Vehicle Safety responsible for the safety development of our vehicle mixsystems, confirmation and validation of safety performance, as well as post-sale safety activities, including recalls and the creation of a new Global Product Integrity organization within Global Product Development with the goal of executing the highest levels of safety performance across all of our vehicles.

Enhancements have also been incorporated through an ongoing process of continuous improvement into the Safety and Field Investigation process to facilitate consistency in post-decision customer actions. Improved investigative and consumer facing processes and standards are also being implemented globally to facilitate rapid and efficient sharing of information across regional teams and markets to aid decision making. Another estimated 100 technical resources have been added globally in support of the revised alignment and process.

We are also actively engaging customers and servicing vehicles affected by the Ignition Switch Recall. We notified affected customers to schedule an appointment with their dealers as replacement parts are available. We began repairing vehicles in early April using parts that have undergone end-of-line quality inspection for performance of six critical operating parameters. We have produced sufficient parts to have the ability to repair all vehicles impacted by the ignition switch and ignition cylinder recalls. Through January 30, 2015 we have repaired approximately 59% of the 2.6 million vehicles subject to recall.

As a result of the Ignition Switch Recall senior leadership initiated a comprehensive review and engineering analysis to identify any additional issues which could potentially result in safety or satisfaction concerns for our customers. As part of our normal process and as a result of these reviews we announced the following additional recall campaigns in 2014:

In the three months ended March 31, 2014 approximately 1.9 million vehicles were recalled to replace either the power steering motor, the steering column, the power steering motor control unit or a combination of the steering column and the power steering motor control unit as the electric power steering could fail under certain circumstances — model years 2004–2006, 2008–2009 Chevrolet Malibu, model years 2004–2006 Malibu Maxx, model years 2006–2010 HHR, model years 2005–2010 Cobalt, model years 2008–2009 Saturn Aura, model years 2003–2007 ION, model years 2007–2010 Pontiac G5, model years 2005–2006, 2008–2009 G6 and model years 2005–2006 Pursuit and G4. We recorded approximately $340 million in Automotive cost of sales to repair these vehicles.

In the three months ended March 31, 2014 approximately 1.3 million vehicles were recalled that are prone to non-deployment of the side impact restraints if vehicles are not serviced when the Service Air Bag warning light is illuminated — model years 2008–2013 Buick Enclave and GMC Acadia, model years 2009–2013 Chevrolet Traverse and model years 2008–2010 Saturn Outlook. We recorded approximately $185 million in Automotive cost of sales to repair these vehicles.

In the three months ended June 30, 2014 approximately 2.7 million vehicles were recalled to modify the brake lamp wiring harness that could have corrosion develop due to increasemicro-vibration — model years 2004–2012 Chevrolet Malibu, model years 2004–2007 Malibu Maxx, model years 2005–2010 Pontiac G6 and model years 2007–2010 Saturn Aura. We recorded approximately $90 million in lower margin vehicles;Automotive cost of sales to repair these vehicles.

In the three months ended June 30, 2014 approximately 1.5 million vehicles were recalled to replace front safety lap belt cables that could fatigue and (2) Otherseparate over time — model years 2009–2014 Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia and model years 2009–2010 Saturn Outlook. We recorded approximately $80 million in Automotive cost of $1.3 billion due primarilysales to decreased U.S. pension incomerepair these vehicles.

In the three months ended June 30, 2014 approximately 1.4 million vehicles were recalled to replace the shift cable that could wear out over time resulting in mismatches of $0.8 billion duethe gear position indicated by the shift lever — model years 2004–2008 Chevrolet Malibu, model years 2004–2007 Malibu Maxx, model years 2007-2008 Saturn Aura, model years 2013–2014 Cadillac ATS, model year 2014 CTS and model years 2005–2008 Pontiac G6. We recorded approximately $150 million in Automotive cost of sales to Decemberrepair these vehicles.

In the three months ended June 30, 2014 approximately 12.1 million vehicles were recalled to rework or replace ignition keys because the ignition switch may move out of the “run” position which may impact power steering and power braking.

31



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

The timing of the key movement relative to the activation of the sensing algorithm of a crash event may result in airbags not deploying — model years 2005–2009 Buick Allure and Lacrosse, model year 2004 Regal LS/GS, model years 2006���2011 Lucerne, model years 1997–2005 Chevrolet Malibu, model years 2000-2007 Monte Carlo, model years 2010–2014 Camaro, model years 2000–2014 Impala, model years 1998–2002 Oldsmobile Intrigue, model years 1999–2004 Alero, model years 1999–2005 Pontiac Grand Am, model years 2004–2008 Grand Prix, model years 2004–2006 Cadillac SRX, model years 2003–2014 CTS, model years 2000–2005 Deville and model years 2006–2011 DTS. We recorded approximately $325 million in Automotive cost of sales to repair these vehicles.

In the three months ended March 31, 2011 plan remeasurements; increased manufacturing expense, including new launches, of $0.6 billion; reduction in favorable lease residual adjustments of $0.5 billion;2014 and unfavorable policyJune 30, 2014 five and warranty adjustments of $0.2 billion; partially offset by decreased engineering expense17 recalls were announced covering approximately 1.2 million and 4.0 million vehicles related to safety, customer satisfaction and other technology feesmatters. We recorded approximately $70 million and $450 million in Automotive cost of $0.5 billion; and decreased material and freight costs of $0.4 billion. These were partially offset by: (3) increased net wholesale volumes; and (4) favorable vehicle pricing effect.

GM Europe

During the second half of 2011 and continuing into 2013, the European automotive industry has been severely affected by high unemployment and a lack of consumer confidence coupled with manufacturing overcapacity. European automotive industry sales to retail and fleet customers were 19 millionrepair these vehicles in the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013, representing a 1.1% decrease compared to the corresponding period in 2012.2014 and June 30, 2014. None of these announced recalls were individually significant.

OutlookIn total we recorded approximately $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion for the above-described actions in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014.

We have formulated a planIn the six months ended December 31, 2014 we announced the following recalls related to safety, customer satisfaction and are implementing various actions to strengthen our operations and increase our competitiveness. The key areas include investments in our product portfolio, a revised brand strategy, significant management changes, reducing material, development and productionother matters, the costs including restructuring activities. The success of our plan will depend on a combination of our ability to execute the actions contemplated, as well as external factors which are outside of our control. We believe it is likely that adverse economic conditions and their effect on the European automotive industry will not improve significantlycomprehended in the near-term; however, we expect to break evenJune 30, 2014 catch-up adjustment of $874 million associated with a change in GME by mid-decade.estimate for previously sold vehicles:

GME Total Net SalesApproximately 1.1 million vehicles were recalled to repair a loose battery cable that could impact vehicle warning systems and Revenueloss of power steering assist - model years 2011-2014 Chevrolet Cruze.

Approximately 0.7 million vehicles were recalled to repair ignition mechanisms where the ignition key could be pulled out while the vehicle is in the run position - model years 2004-2007 Saturn Vue, model years 2005-2006 Chevrolet Equinox, model year 2006 Pontiac Torrent.

Approximately 0.6 million vehicles were recalled to replace the wave plate in all vehicles with 6T70 and EBIT (Loss)-Adjusted6T75 transmissions which could crack under certain circumstances - model years 2007-2009 GMC Acadia, Pontiac G6, Saturn Aura and Outlook, model years 2008-2009 Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Equinox and Malibu, Pontiac Torrent, Saturn Vue, model year 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.

Approximately 5.7 million vehicles were announced under 20 additional recalls, none of which were individually significant.

The following table summarizes the activity for customer satisfaction campaigns, safety recalls, non-compliance recalls and special coverage in GMNA, including courtesy transportation (dollars in millions):

39
32



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Years Ended December 31,
Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change

Variance Due To

2013
2012
Favorable/ (Unfavorable)
%

Volume
Mix
Price
Other
Total

(Dollars in millions)




(Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$20,110

$20,689

$(579)
(2.8)%

$(0.6)
$

$(0.2)
$0.2

$(0.6)
EBIT (loss)-adjusted$(844)
$(1,939)
$1,095

(56.5)%

$(0.1)
$(0.2)
$(0.2)
$1.6

$1.1
 (Vehicles in thousands)             
Wholesale vehicle sales1,047
 1,079
 (32) (3.0)%           
 2014 2013
Balance at January 1$761
 $851
Additions1,333
 115
Payments(110) (115)
Adjustments to prior periods(19) 11
Balance at March 311,965
 862
Additions1,151
 128
Payments(329) (132)
Adjustments to prior periods691
 (8)
Balance at June 303,478
 850
Additions163
 51
Payments(637) (130)
Adjustments to prior periods52
 (21)
Balance at September 303,056
 750
Additions133
 119
Payments(542) (117)
Adjustments to prior periods82
 9
Balance at December 31$2,729
 $761

Adjustments to prior periods in the three months ended June 30, 2014 included: (1) a catch-up adjustment associated with a change in estimate for previously sold vehicles of $874 million; partially offset by (2) adjustments of approximately $95 million for courtesy transportation as a result of greater part availability and fewer customers utilizing courtesy transportation than originally estimated; and (3) approximately $80 million for costs originally estimated separately for ignition switches and ignition lock cylinders that are now being shipped and repaired at the same time resulting in reduced costs. Based on the per vehicle part and labor cost, number of vehicles impacted and the expected number of vehicles to be repaired we believe the amounts recorded are adequate to cover the costs of these recall campaigns.

Adjustments to prior periods in the three months ended September 30, 2014 included an additional catch-up adjustment to our change in estimate for previously sold vehicles, which was partially offset by a change in estimate on a previously announced specific recall action due to reduced costs for both parts and labor. On a net basis, recall campaign and courtesy transportation adjustments for our previously sold vehicles increased approximately $52 million in the three months ended September 30, 2014.

Adjustments to prior periods in the three months ended December 31, 2014 included an additional catch-up adjustment to our change in estimate for previously sold vehicles. On a net basis, recall campaign and courtesy transportation adjustments for our previously sold vehicles increased approximately $82 million in the three months ended December 31, 2014.

The Ignition Switch Recall has led to various governmental investigations and inquiries including a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and investigations by Congress, the SEC and various state attorneys general. In addition the Ignition Switch Recall and the other recalls described above have resulted in a number of claims and lawsuits. Refer to Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

GM Europe

GME Total Net Sales and Revenue and EBIT (Loss)-Adjusted

33



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Years Ended December 31,
Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change

Variance Due To

2014
2013
Favorable/ (Unfavorable)
%

Volume
Mix
Price
Other

(Dollars in millions)




(Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$22,235

$21,962

$273

1.2 %

$0.2

$0.7

$

$(0.5)
EBIT (loss)-adjusted$(1,369)
$(869)
$(500)
(57.5)%

$

$0.2

$

$(0.7)
 (Vehicles in thousands)           
Wholesale vehicle sales1,172
 1,163
 9
 0.8 %         

Years Ended December 31,
Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change

Variance Due ToYears Ended December 31,
Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change

Variance Due To

2012
2011
Favorable/ (Unfavorable)
%

Volume
Mix
Price
Other
Total2013
2012
Favorable/ (Unfavorable)
%

Volume
Mix
Price
Other

(Dollars in millions)




(Dollars in billions)(Dollars in millions)




(Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$20,689

$25,154

$(4,465)
(17.8)%

$(2.4)
$0.4

$(0.2)
$(2.3)
$(4.5)$21,962

$23,055

$(1,093)
(4.7)%

$(1.1)
$

$(0.2)
$0.2
EBIT (loss)-adjusted$(1,939)
$(1,041)
$(898)
86.3 %

$(0.5)
$(0.4)
$(0.2)
$0.2

$(0.9)$(869)
$(1,949)
$1,080

55.4 %

$(0.1)
$(0.3)
$(0.2)
$1.7
(Vehicles in thousands)             (Vehicles in thousands)           
Wholesale vehicle sales1,079
 1,240
 (161) (13.0)%           1,163
 1,231
 (68) (5.5)%         

GME Total Net Sales and Revenue

In the year ended December 31, 2014 Total net sales and revenue increased due primarily to: (1) favorable vehicle mix due to increased sales of higher priced vehicles; and (2) increased wholesale volumes associated with higher demand primarily for the Mokka across the region and the Corsa and Insignia in Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, Italy and Poland, partially offset by decreases across the Russian portfolio and lower demand for the Astra primarily in Germany, United Kingdom and Turkey; partially offset by (3) unfavorable Other of $0.5 billion due primarily to net foreign currency effect related to the weakening of the Russian Ruble against the U.S. Dollar, partially offset by the strengthening of the British Pound against the U.S. Dollar.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Total net sales and revenue decreased due primarily to: (1) decreased wholesale volumes associated with lower demand of the Astra, Corsa and Meriva in France, Italy, Russia and the Netherlands and across the Russian Chevrolet portfolio, partially offset by higher demand for the Mokka and Adam across the region due to thea weak European economy; and (2) unfavorable vehicle pricing primarily resulting from increased incentive support associated with difficult market conditions; partially offset by (3) favorable Other of $0.2$0.2 billion due primarily to favorable net foreign currency effect.

GME EBIT (Loss)-Adjusted

In the year ended December 31, 2012 Total net sales and revenue decreased2014 EBIT (loss)-adjusted increased due primarily to: (1) decreased wholesale volumes due to the weak European economy; (2) unfavorable price effects primarily resulting from increased incentive support associated with strong competition; and (3) Other of $2.3$0.7 billion due primarily to unfavorablerestructuring related charges of $0.5 billion, net foreign currency effect of $1.7$0.3 billion resulting fromdue primarily to weakening of the Russian Ruble against the U.S. Dollar, partially offset by the strengthening of the British Pound against the U.S. Dollar, againstand unfavorable net effect of changes in the Euro, Russian Ruble, Hungarian Forint, Turkish Lira and British Pound; decreased parts, accessories and powertrain engine and transmission salesfair value of $0.5an embedded foreign currency derivative asset of $0.1 billion associated with lower demand; and a decrease of $0.1 billion due to the deconsolidation of VMM in June 2011;long-term supply agreement, partially offset by (4)decreased material and freight costs of $0.2 billion; partially offset by (2) favorable net vehicle mix due to the new generation Astra GTC, Opel Mokka and Ampera and increased saleshigher proportion of other higher priced vehicles.

GME EBIT (Loss)-Adjusted

In the year ended December 31, 2013 EBIT (loss)-adjusted decreased due primarily to: (1) favorable Other of $1.6$1.7 billion due primarily to decreased manufacturing costs of $0.7 billion mainly resulting from decreased depreciation expense because of asset impairments in December 2012 which decreased the depreciable base;base, decreased engineering expenses of $0.3 billion; favorable$0.4 billion, decreased material and freight costs of $0.3 billion;$0.4 billion and a favorable net effect of changes in the fair value of an embedded foreign currency derivative asset of $0.2 billion associated with a long-term supply agreement; partially offset by (2) unfavorable net vehicle mix due to lower proportiondecreased sales of higher priced vehicles; (3) unfavorable vehicle pricing; and (4) decreased wholesale volumes.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 EBIT (loss)-adjusted increased due primarily to: (1) decreased wholesale volumes; (2) unfavorable net vehicle mix; and (3) unfavorable price effects; partially offset by (4) Other of $0.2 billion due primarily to lower manufacturing and material costs of $0.4 billion; and favorable net foreign currency effect of $0.1 billion resulting from the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro, Russian Ruble, Hungarian Forint, Turkish Lira, and British Pound; partially offset by a decrease of $0.2 billion resulting from the net effect of changes in an embedded foreign currency derivative asset associated with a long-term supply agreement; and decreased parts, accessories and powertrain engine and transmission sales of $0.2 billion, associated with lower demand.

GM International Operations

We have strategically assessed the manner in which we operate in certain countries within GMIO, including our cost structure, the level of local sourcing, the level of investment in the product portfolio, the allocation of production activity to the existing manufacturing base and our brand strategy. These strategic reviews considered the effects that recent and forecasted deteriorationFocus on Chinese Market


40
34



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

in local market conditions would have on our operations. While we are continuing our strategic assessments, we have taken certain actions and incurred impairment and other charges as detailed below.

Withdrawal of the Chevrolet Brand from Europe

In December 2013 we announced our plans to cease mainstream distribution of Chevrolet brand in Western and Central Europe in 2015 due to the challenging business model and difficult economic situation in Europe. The results of our Chevrolet operations in Western and Central Europe, which are subsidiaries of our GM Korea operations, are reflected in the financial results of our GMIO region. This action is expected to improve our European operations through a further strengthening of our Opel and Vauxhall brands and reduce the market complexity associated with both Opel and Chevrolet products in Western and Central Europe. In the three months ended December 31, 2013 we recorded pre-tax charges of $0.6 billion, net of noncontrolling interests of 23.0%, consisting of intangible asset impairment charges, dealer restructuring costs, sales incentive and inventory related costs and employee severance and other costs. We may incur additional charges of up to $0.3 billion through the first half of 2014 primarily for dealer restructuring costs and sales incentives. Refer to Note 19 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Holden

In December 2013 we announced plans to cease vehicle and engine manufacturing and significantly reduce engineering operations at Holden by the end of 2017. Holden will continue to sell imported vehicles through its Holden dealer network and maintain its global design studio. Our Australian operations have been subject to unfavorable market conditions including the sustained strength of the Australian dollar, high cost of production and a small but highly competitive and fragmented domestic automotive market. In the three months ended December 31, 2013 we recorded pre-tax charges of $0.5 billion consisting of asset impairment charges including property, plant and equipment and exit-related costs including certain employee severance related costs. We expect to incur additional charges through 2017 for incremental future cash payments of employee severance once negotiations of the amount are completed. Refer to Note 19 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

GM India

In the three months ended December 31, 2013 we performed a strategic assessment of GM India in response to lower than expected sales performance of our current product offerings in India, higher raw material costs, unfavorable foreign exchange rates and recent deterioration in local market conditions. As a result we recorded pre-tax asset impairment charges of $0.3 billion, net of noncontrolling interests of 9.2%, to adjust the carrying amount of GM India’s real and personal property, Intangible assets, net and Goodwill. Our strategic assessment also outlines planned actions requiring additional future investments and modifications to our existing GM India business model that are needed to reach profitability in the medium to long-term. There are no assurances that the forecasted financial results outlined in the strategic assessment will be achieved. Refer to Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Goodwill Impairment Charges

We recorded Goodwill impairment charges of $0.5 billion in the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily related to our GM Korea and GM India reporting units.

Focus on Chinese Market

We view the Chinese market as important to our global growth strategy and are employing a multi-brand strategy, led by our Buick and Chevrolet brands. In the coming years we plan to increasingly leverage our global architectures to increase the number of nameplates under the Buick, Chevrolet and Cadillac brands in China and continue to grow our business under the Baojun Jiefang and Wuling brands. We operate in the Chinese market through a number of joint ventures and maintaining good relations with our joint venture partners, which are affiliated with the Chinese government, is an important part of our China growth strategy.

The following tables summarize certain key operational and financial data for the China JVs (dollars in millions, vehicles in thousands):

41



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Total wholesale vehicles(a)3,239
 2,909
 2,573
3,613
 3,239
 2,909
Market share14.3% 14.6% 13.6%14.8% 14.2% 14.6%
Total net sales and revenue$38,767
 $33,364
 $30,511
$43,853
 $38,767
 $33,364
Net income$3,685
 $3,198
 $3,203
$4,312
 $3,685
 $3,198
_______
(a)Including vehicles exported to markets outside of China.
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Cash and cash equivalents$6,606
 $5,522
$6,176
 $6,606
Debt$151
 $123
$151
 $151

GMIO Total Net Sales and Revenue and EBIT-Adjusted
Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change  Variance Due ToYears Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change   
2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other Total2014 2013 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other
(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)(Dollars in millions)     
Total net sales and revenue$20,263
 $22,954
 $(2,691) (11.7)%  $(1.3) $(0.1) $(0.5) $(0.8) $(2.7)$14,392
 $18,411
 $(4,019) (21.8)%  $(4.6) $0.4
 $0.7
 $(0.4)
EBIT-adjusted$1,230
 $2,528
 $(1,298) (51.3)%  $(0.3) $(0.5) $(0.3) $(0.2) $(1.3)$1,222
 $1,255
 $(33) (2.6)%  $(0.9) $(0.1) $0.4
 $0.6
(Vehicles in thousands)             (Vehicles in thousands)           
Wholesale vehicle sales1,037
 1,109
 (72) (6.5)%           655
 921
 (266) (28.9)%         
Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change  Variance Due ToYears Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change  Variance Due To
2012 2011 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other Total2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other
(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$22,954
 $21,031
 $1,923
 9.1%  $1.4
 $0.3
 $0.8
 $(0.6) $1.9
$18,411
 $20,588
 $(2,177) (10.6)%  $(0.8) $(0.2) $(0.5) $(0.7)
EBIT-adjusted$2,528
 $2,232
 $296
 13.3%  $0.5
 $(0.1) $0.8
 $(0.9) $0.3
$1,255
 $2,538
 $(1,283) (50.6)%  $(0.3) $(0.4) $(0.3) $(0.3)
(Vehicles in thousands)             (Vehicles in thousands)           
Wholesale vehicle sales1,109
 1,039
 70
 6.7%           921
 957
 (36) (3.8)%         

GMIO Total Net Sales and Revenue

The vehicle sales of our China JVs and of GM India prior to September 1, 2012, the date we consolidated GM India, are not recorded in Total net sales and revenue. The results of our nonconsolidated joint ventures are recorded in Equity income and gain on investments. Refer to Notes 3 and 8 to our consolidated financial statements for further detail on the acquisition of GM India.income.

In the year ended December 31, 20132014 Total net sales and revenue decreased due primarily to: (1) decreased wholesale volumevolumes primarily related to discontinuing sales of 129,000 vehicles (or 11.6%) primarilythe Chevrolet Spark, Aveo, Cruze, Captiva and Orlando in Europe and lower sales of older version SUVs and trucks (including the Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, Sierra, and Silverado) and other carlines (such as the Acadia and Traverse) ahead of the new full-size truck introduction in the Middle East and lower sales of the Chevrolet brandColorado, Sonic, Trailblazer, Cruze and Captiva in Thailand; and (2) unfavorable Other of $0.4 billion due primarily to unfavorable net foreign currency effect of $0.3 billion driven by the weakening of the Australian Dollar, South African Rand, Thai Baht and Indian Rupee against the U.S.

35



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Dollar and decreased sales of components, parts and accessories of $0.1 billion; partially offset by (3) favorable vehicle pricing due primarily to sales of new full-size trucks (including the Tahoe, Suburban, Yukon, Escalade, Sierra and Silverado) in the Middle East and lower sales incentive offered on Chevrolet vehicles in Europe; and (4) favorable mix due primarily to an improved sales portfolio of the Malibu and Trax in Korea and the Tahoe and Yukon in the Middle East.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Total net sales and revenue decreased due primarily to: (1) decreased wholesale volumes due primarily to lower sales of the Optra, Yukon, Colorado, Captiva, Sail and Aveo in the Middle East and lower sales of the Chevrolet Orlando, Captiva, Cruze, Aveo and Spark in Europe partially offset by an increase from the consolidation of GM India effective September 2012 resulting in an additional 57,000 wholesale vehicle sales (or 5.0%6.0%) in 2013; (2) unfavorable vehicle pricing due to increased incentive support associated with strong competition;competition, including an increase of $0.2 billion in Europe as a result of our decision to withdraw the Chevrolet Brand from Europe, an increase of $0.2 billion in the Middle East due to the competition on SUVs and trucks such as the Yukon, Tahoe, Suburban, Sierra and Silverado and increases of $0.1 billion in Holden and Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) for the Colorado, Captiva, Commodore, Trailblazer and Sonic; (3) unfavorable vehicle mix;mix primarily in ASEAN due to a higher proportion of the lower priced Spin and a lower proportion of the higher priced Colorado; and (4) Other of $0.8$0.7 billion due primarily to unfavorable net foreign currency effect due to the weakening of the Australian Dollar, the South AfricaAfrican Rand and the Egyptian Pound against the U.S. Dollar of $0.5$0.4 billion and decreased sales of components, parts and accessories of $0.3 billion.

GMIO EBIT-Adjusted

In the year ended December 31, 20122014 Total net sales and revenue increasedEBIT-adjusted decreased due primarily to: (1) increaseddecreased net wholesale volumevolumes primarily related to discontinuing sales of 41,000 vehicles (of 4.0%)the Chevrolet Spark, Aveo, Cruze, Captiva and Orlando in Europe and lower sales of older version SUVs and trucks and other carlines ahead of the new full-size truck introduction in the Middle East and Colorado, Sonic, Trailblazer, Cruze and Captiva in Thailand; and (2) unfavorable net vehicle mix due primarily to strong industry growth acrosshigher cost of the region; coupled with an increase from the consolidation of GM India effective September 2012 resultingCommodore and Colorado in an inclusion of 29,000 wholesale vehicle sales (or 2.8%); (2) favorable pricing due to higher pricing on new models launched; andAustralia, partially offset by (3) favorable vehicle mixpricing due primarily to increased exportsales of new product; partially offset byfull-size trucks in the Middle East; and (4) favorable Other of $0.6 billion due primarily to favorable engineering cost of $0.3 billion, a decrease in selling, general and advertising expense of $0.3 billion due primarily to the withdrawal of Chevrolet brand in Europe in 2013, favorable equity income from China JVs of $0.3 billion, and favorable manufacturing costs and depreciation of $0.2 billion, partially offset by unfavorable recall programs of $0.1 billion, a decrease in sales of components parts and accessories of $0.1 billion, tooling impairment charges of $0.1 billion related to the Sonic in Thailand, the Aveo in Korea and the Spin in Indonesia, and unfavorable net foreign currency effect due to the weakening of the Korean Won and South Africa Rand against the U.S. Dollar of $0.5 billion; and decrease in components, parts and accessories revenue of $0.1 billion.

GMIO EBIT-Adjusted

42



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


In the year ended December 31, 2013 EBIT-adjusted decreased due primarily to: (1) unfavorable net vehicle mix primarily in the Middle East due to deteriorated sales portfolio from the Yukon, Captiva, Optra and Australian markets;markets due to deteriorated sales portfolio from high margin vehicles such as the Cruze; (2) unfavorable vehicle pricing excluding $0.2 billion sales incentive related to withdrawal of the Chevrolet brand from Europe; (3) unfavorable net wholesale volumes; and (4) Other of $0.2$0.3 billion due primarily to unfavorable manufacturing costs of $0.3 billion;$0.4 billion, unfavorable net foreign currency effect of $0.2 billion;billion, and a decrease in sales of components, parts and accessories of $0.2 billion;billion, partially offset by favorable material and freight cost of $0.3 billion;billion, and increased equity income, net of tax of $0.2 billion, from our interest in the increased net income of our China JVs.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 EBIT-adjusted increased due primarily to: (1) favorable pricing due to higher pricing on new models launched; and (2) favorable net wholesale volumes; partially offset by (3) unfavorable net vehicle mix; and (4) Other of $0.9 billion due primarily to increased costs of $1.0 billion due primarily to increased material, freight and manufacturing costs; partially offset by net gain of $0.1 billion measured as the difference between the fair value of our 50% interest in GM India and the investment carrying amount at the date of acquisition.

GM South America

Venezuelan Operations

Our Venezuelan subsidiariessubsidiaries' functional currency is the U.S. Dollar because of the hyperinflationary status of the Venezuelan economy.

Effective February 13, 2013 the Venezuelan government set the official fixed exchange rate of the Bolivar Fuerte (BsF) at BsF 6.3 to $1.00 from BsF 4.3 to $1.00. The devaluation resulted in a charge of $0.2 billion recorded in Automotive cost of sales in the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the remeasurement of our Venezuelan subsidiaries' non-U.S. Dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities.We The remeasurement charge was treated as an adjustment for EBIT-adjusted reporting purposes.

Effective March 31, 2014 we changed the exchange rate we use for remeasuring our Venezuelan subsidiaries’ non-U.S. Dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities from the Venezuela official exchange rate to the rate determined by an auction process conducted by Venezuela’s SICAD I because we believe itthe SICAD I rate is possible thatthe most representative rate to be used for remeasurement. At March 31, 2014 the SICAD I exchange rate was BsF 10.7 to $1.00. The devaluation resulted in a charge of $0.4 billion recorded in Automotive cost of sales in the three months ended March 31, 2014. The remeasurement charge in the three months ended

36



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

March 31, 2014 was treated as an adjustment for EBIT-adjusted reporting purposes. In August 2014 the Venezuelan government may further devalueannounced the SICAD I rate as the official rate for the automotive industry going forward and clarified BsF against6.3 to $1.00 as the U.S. Dollarofficial rate for pre-existing debt settlements. Gains on pre-existing debt settlements at more favorable rates than the SICAD I exchange rate will not be recognized until collection is assured. At December 31, 2014 the SICAD I exchange rate was BsF 12.0 to $1.00 and we recorded an insignificant net devaluation loss in Automotive costs of sales in the future. Ifnine months ended December 31, 2014. The non-U.S. Dollar denominated assets and liabilities of our Venezuelan subsidiaries may be impacted by periodic auctions in SICAD I rates which may have a material impact on the BsF were devalued further, it would resultresults of operations in a charge to our income statementVenezuela in the period of devaluation.future periods. Based on our December 31, 20132014 non-U.S. Dollar denominated net monetary assets a charge of approximatelyless than $0.1 billion would result for every 10% devaluation of the BsF.BsF from the SICAD I exchange rate of BsF 12.0 to $1.00 in the period of devaluation.

In December 2013 a new decree became effective requiring the government of Venezuela to set prices for all vehicles, parts and accessories sold in the country. In addition theThe Venezuelan government has foreign exchange control regulations that make it difficult to convert BsF to U.S. Dollars whichDollar and affect our Venezuelan subsidiaries’ ability to pay non-BsF denominated obligations and to pay dividends. The total amounts pending government approval for settlement in U.S. Dollar at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were BsF 3.5 billion (equivalent to $0.5 billion) and BsF 3.7 billion (equivalent to $0.6 billion). These amounts include dividend requests in the amount of BsF 0.7 billion (equivalent to $0.1 billion) that have been pending from 2007. At December 31, 2014 we continued to consolidate our Venezuelan subsidiaries because recent developments, including participation in SICAD I auctions for new orders in August 2014, settlements of preexisting debt in October and November 2014 and execution of a labor agreement in November 2014 resulted in increases in production in the three months ended December 31, 2014. Our Venezuelan subsidiaries' net assets were $0.5 billion at December 31, 2014, including non-U.S. Dollar denominated net monetary assets of $0.5 billion. At December 31, 2014 other consolidated entities had receivables from our Venezuelan subsidiaries of $0.4 billion.

In January 2014 the VenezuelanVenezuela government announced changes toenacted a law limiting sale prices and establishing a maximum margin of 30% above a defined cost structure. Because the foreign exchange process which couldVenezuela government is still determining the application of certain aspects of this law it is unclear based on the current regulations how this new law may affect the rate at which our Venezuelan subsidiaries buy dollars.current vehicle and parts and accessories sale pricing structure. These regulations, when considered with otherthe foreign currency exchange regulations, high inflation, governmental policies negatively impacting our ability to implement labor force reductions and obtain vehicle imports licenses, the recent downward trend in the price of oil and other circumstances in Venezuela, may limitimpact our ability to fully benefit from and maintain our controlling financial interest in our Venezuelan subsidiaries. The financial impact on our operations in Venezuela of these events and associated ongoing restrictions are uncertain.

The total amounts pending government approval for settlement in U.S. Dollar at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were BsF 3.7 billion (equivalent to $0.6 billion) and BsF 2.2 billion (equivalent to $0.5 billion). These amounts include requests If a determination is made in the amountfuture that we no longer maintain a controlling financial interest, we may incur a charge, based on current exchange rates, of BsF 0.6 billion (equivalentup to $0.1 billion) that have been pending from 2007. Our Venezuelan subsidiaries net assets were $0.9 billion at December 31, 2013, including net monetary assets of $1.0 billion. At December 31, 2013 other consolidated entities had receivables from our Venezuelan subsidiaries denominated in other currencies of $0.5 billion.

GMSA Total Net Sales and Revenue and EBIT-AdjustedEBIT (Loss)-Adjusted
Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change  Variance Due ToYears Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change  Variance Due To
2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other Total2014 2013 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other
(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)(Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$16,478
 $16,700
 $(222) (1.3)%  $
 $0.6
 $0.9
 $(1.7) $(0.2)$13,115
 $16,478
 $(3,363) (20.4)%  $(2.4) $0.1
 $1.1
 $(2.1)
EBIT-adjusted$327
 $457
 $(130) (28.4)%  $
 $0.3
 $0.9
 $(1.3) $(0.1)
EBIT (loss)-adjusted$(180) $327
 $(507) n.m.
  $(0.5) $(0.1) $1.1
 $(1.0)
(Vehicles in thousands)             (Vehicles in thousands)           
Wholesale vehicle sales1,053
 1,050
 3
 0.3 %           886
 1,053
 (167) (15.9)%         
________
n.m. = not meaningful
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change  Variance Due To
 2013 2012 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$16,478
 $16,700
 $(222) (1.3)%  $
 $0.6
 $0.9
 $(1.7)
EBIT-adjusted$327
 $457
 $(130) (28.4)%  $
 $0.3
 $0.9
 $(1.3)
 (Vehicles in thousands)           
Wholesale vehicle sales1,053
 1,050
 3
 0.3 %         

GMSA Total Net Sales and Revenue


43
37



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change  Variance Due To
 2012 2011 Favorable/ (Unfavorable) %  Volume Mix Price Other Total
 (Dollars in millions)    (Dollars in billions)
Total net sales and revenue$16,700
 $16,632
 $68
 0.4 %  $(0.6) $1.6
 $0.5
 $(1.4) $0.1
EBIT-adjusted$457
 $158
 $299
 189.2 %  $(0.2) $0.4
 $0.5
 $(0.4) $0.3
 (Vehicles in thousands)             
Wholesale vehicle sales1,050
 1,090
 (40) (3.7)%           
__________
n.m. = not meaningful

GMSAIn the year ended December 31, 2014 Total Net Salesnet sales and Revenuerevenue decreased due primarily to: (1) decreased wholesale volumes in Brazil associated with lower demand of the Chevrolet Celta, Classic and Agile and decreases across the portfolios in Argentina and Venezuela caused by difficult economic conditions; and (2) unfavorable Other of $2.1 billion due primarily to unfavorable net foreign currency effect due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against all currencies across the region; partially offset by (3) favorable vehicle pricing primarily due to high inflation in Argentina and Venezuela.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Total net sales and revenue decreased due primarily to: (1) unfavorable Other of $1.7 billion due primarily to unfavorable net foreign currency effect due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Brazilian Real and Argentinian Peso and the devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar of $1.9 billion;billion, partially offset by increased revenue from parts and accessories sales of $0.1 billion; partially offset by (2) favorable vehicle pricing primarily due to high inflation in Venezuela and Argentina; and (3) favorable vehicle mix due to increased sales of the Chevrolet Trailblazer, Chevrolet Captiva and S-10 in Brazil and the Chevrolet Orlando Chevroletand Tahoe and Chevrolet S10.in Venezuela.

GMSA EBIT (Loss)-Adjusted

In the year ended December 31, 2012 Total net sales and revenue increased2014 GMSA had EBIT (loss)-adjusted compared to EBIT-adjusted in the year ended December 31, 2013 due primarily to: (1) favorable vehicle mix due to increased sales of Chevrolet Cruze and Chevrolet S10; and (2) favorable vehicle pricing primarily due to high inflation in Venezuela and Argentina; partially offset by (3) decreased wholesale volumes due to deteriorated market share drivenin Brazil associated with lower demand of the Chevrolet Celta, Classic and Agile and decreases across the portfolios in Argentina and Venezuela caused by increased competitiondifficult economic conditions; and aggressive pricing in the market; and (4)(2) unfavorable Other of $1.4$1.0 billion due primarily to unfavorable net foreign currency effect due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against all currencies across the Brazilian Real and Argentinian Peso and the devaluation of the BsF of $1.5 billion;region; partially offset by increased revenue from parts(3) favorable vehicle pricing primarily due to high inflation in Argentina and accessories sales of $0.1 billion.

GMSA EBIT-AdjustedVenezuela.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 EBIT-adjusted decreased due primarily to: (1) unfavorable Other of $1.3 billion due primarily to unfavorable net foreign currency effect as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Brazilian Real and Argentinian Peso and the devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar of $1.1 billion;billion, increased selling, general and administrative expense mainly due primarily to a decrease in contingency reserves of $0.1 billion in the corresponding period of 2012 due to the resolution of certain items at amounts lower than previously expected;expected, and a gain of $50 million on the purchase of GMAC de Venezuela CA in the corresponding period of 2012; partially offset by (2) favorable vehicle pricing effect primarily driven by high inflation in Venezuela and Argentina; and (3) favorable net vehicle mix.mix due to increased sales of the Chevrolet Trailblazer, Captiva and S-10 in Brazil and the Chevrolet Orlando and Tahoe in Venezuela.

GM Financial
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change
 2014 2013 2012 Amount % Amount %
 (Dollars in millions)
Total revenue$4,854
 $3,344
 $1,961
 $1,510
 45.2 % $1,383
 70.5%
Provision for loan losses$604
 $475
 $304
 $129
 27.2 % $171
 56.3%
Income before income taxes-adjusted$803
 $898
 $744
 $(95) (10.6)% $154
 20.7%
 (Dollars in billions)
Average debt outstanding$32.2
 $21.0
 $9.5
 $11.2
 53.3 % $11.5
 121.1%
Effective rate of interest paid4.4% 3.4% 3.0% 1.0%   0.4%  

GM Financial Revenue

In the year ended December 31, 2012 EBIT-adjusted2014 Total revenue increased due primarily to: (1) favorable vehicle pricing; and (2) favorable net vehicle mix; partially offset by (3) unfavorable net wholesale volumes; and (4) Otherincreased finance charge income of $0.4 billion due primarily to increased material, freight and manufacturing costs of $0.5 billion; and increased administrative and advertising and sales promotion expenses of $0.1 billion to support launches of new products; partially offset by decreases in contingency reserves of $0.1$0.9 billion due to the resolutionacquisition of certain items at amounts lower than previously expected;Ally Financial international operations; and (2) increased leased vehicle income of $0.5 billion due to a bargain purchase gain of $50 million on the purchase of GMAC de Venezuela CA.

GM Financial

44



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011 Amount % Amount %
 (Dollars in millions)
Total revenue$3,344
 $1,961
 $1,410
 $1,383
 70.5% $551
 39.1%
Provision for loan losses$475
 $304
 $178
 $171
 56.3% $126
 70.8%
Income before income taxes$883
 $744
 $622
 $139
 18.7% $122
 19.6%
 (Dollars in billions)
Average debt outstanding$21.0
 $9.5
 $7.6
 $11.5
 121.1% $1.9
 25.0%
Effective rate of interest paid3.4% 3.0% 2.7% 0.4%   0.3%  

GM Financial Revenuelarger lease portfolio.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Total revenue increased due primarily to: (1) increased finance charge income of $1.0 billion due to the acquisition of Ally Financial international operations and increased loan originations; and (2) increased leased vehicle income of $0.3 billion due to a larger lease portfolio.

GM Financial Income Before Income Taxes-Adjusted

38



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


In the year ended December 31, 2012 Total revenue increased2014 Income before income taxes-adjusted decreased due primarily to: (1) increased finance charge incomeinterest expenses of $0.3$0.7 billion due to higher average debt outstanding and effective rate of interest paid; (2) increased operating expenses of $0.4 billion due to the acquisition of Ally Financial international operations; (3) increased leased vehicle expenses of $0.4 billion due to a larger lease portfolio; and (2)(4) increased leased vehicles incomeprovision for loan losses of $0.2 billion due to the$0.1 billion; partially offset by (5) increased sizerevenue of the leased asset portfolio.

GM Financial Income Before Income Taxes$1.5 billion.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 Income before income taxestaxes-adjusted increased due primarily to: (1) increased revenue of $1.0$1.4 billion; partially offset by (2) increased provision for loan losses; (3) increased interest expenses of $0.4 billion; and (4) increased operating expenses of $0.4 billion; and (5) increased leased vehicle expenses of $0.2 billion. These changes are due primarily to the acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 Income before income taxes increased due primarily to: (1) increased revenue of $0.6 billion; partially offset by (2) increased leased vehicle expenses of $0.1 billion due to a larger lease portfolio; (3) increased provision for loan losses due to a larger loan portfolio; (4) increased interest expenses of $0.1 billion due primarily to new debt; and (5) increased operating expenses of $0.1 billion due to an increase of personnel to support company growth.

Corporate
(Dollars in Millions)
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change Year Ended 2012 vs. 2011 Change
 2013 2012 2011 Amount % Amount %
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders$(2,138) $33,809
 $(452) $(35,947) n.m. $34,261
 n.m.
__________
n.m. = not meaningful

Nonsegment operations are classified as Corporate. Corporate includes certain centrally recorded income and costs, such as interest, income taxes and corporate expenditures and certain nonsegment specific revenues and expenses.

The following table summarizes the changes in Corporate Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders (dollars in billions):

45



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ended
 2013 vs. 2012 2012 vs. 2011
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance release in U.S. and Canada$(36.3) $36.3
Other tax related matters(0.5) (1.4)
Impairment of investment in Ally Financial common stock
 0.6
Premium paid to purchase common stock from UST0.4
 (0.4)
Gain on sale of Ally Financial preferred and common stock0.5
 (0.3)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (0.3)
Other
 (0.2)
 $(35.9) $34.3

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity Overview

We believe that our current level of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and availability under our secured revolving credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs. However weWe expect to have substantial cash requirements going forward which we plan to fund through total available liquidity and cash flows generated from operations. We also maintain access to the capital markets, which may provide an additional source of liquidity. Our future uses of cash, which may vary from time to time based on market conditions and other factors, are centered around three objectives: (1) reinvest in our business; (2) continue to strengthen our balance sheet and competitive position;sheet; and (3) return cash to shareholders.stockholders. Our known future material uses of cash include, among other possible demands: (1) capital expenditures of approximately $7.5$9.0 billion annually as well as payments for engineering and product development activities; (2) acquiring Ally Financial's equity interests in GMAC-SAIC, as subsequently discussed, forpayments associated with recently announced vehicle recalls and the Program of approximately $0.9 billion;$1.2 billion; (3) payments to service debt and other long-term obligations, including contributions to non-U.S. pension plans and U.S. non-qualified plans of approximately $1.2 billion; (4) payments for previously announced restructuring activities of up to $1.1approximately $1.0 billion; (4) payments to service debt and other long-term obligations; (5) payments to purchase the remaining outstanding sharesacquiring Ally Financial's equity interests in SAIC-GMAC of our Series A Preferred Stock with a liquidation amount of $3.9approximately $1.0 billion once the shares become redeemable on or after December 31, 2014;(acquisition completed in January 2015); and (6) dividend payments on our common stock that are declared by our Board of Directors.

Our liquidity plans are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described in the “Risk Factors”Item 1A. Risk Factors section of this 20132014 Form 10-K, some of which are outside our control. Macroeconomic conditions could limit our ability to successfully execute our business plans and therefore adversely affect our liquidity plans.

plans and compliance with certain covenants. Refer to Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for the discussion of our financial and operational covenants.
Recent Management Initiatives

We continue to monitor and evaluate opportunities to strengthen our balance sheet and competitive position over the long-term.long term. These actions may include opportunistic payments to reduce our long-term obligations while maintaining minimal automotive financial leverage as well as the possibility of acquisitions, dispositions and strategic alliances that we believe would generate significant advantages and substantially strengthen our business. These actions may include additional loans, investments with our joint venture partners or the acquisitions of certain operations or ownership stakes in outside businesses. These actions may negatively impact our liquidity in the short-term.

In November 2012 GM Financial entered into agreements with Ally Financial to acquire Ally Financial's automotive finance and financial services businesses in Europe and Latin America and Ally Financial's equity interests in GMAC-SAIC for approximately $4.2 billion. GM Financial has completedshort term including the acquisitions of Ally Financial's European and Latin American automotive finance operations for $3.3 billion in 2013. Increases in GM Financial receivables and GM Financial Short-term and Long-term debt in 2013 compared to 2012 were due primarily to the acquisition. Refer to Note 3payments related to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on these acquisitions.recent recalls and the related litigation.

In April 2013 GM Korea made a payment of $0.7October 2014 we amended our two primary revolving credit facilities, increasing our aggregate borrowing capacity from $11.0 billion to acquire, prior$12.5 billion. These facilities consist of a three-year, $5.0 billion facility and a five-year, $7.5 billion facility. Both facilities are available to the mandatory redemption date, the remaining balanceCompany as well as certain wholly-owned subsidiaries, including GM Financial. The three-year, $5.0 billion facility allows for borrowings in U.S. Dollars and other currencies and includes a GM Financial borrowing sub-limit of $2.0 billion, a letter of credit sub-facility of $1.6 billion and a Brazilian Real sub-facility of $0.3 billion. The five-year, $7.5 billion facility allows for borrowings in U.S. Dollars and other currencies and includes a GM Korea's seven percent mandatorily redeemable preferred shares that hadFinancial borrowing sub-limit of $2.0 billion, a carrying amountletter of credit sub-limit of $0.5 billion. We recorded the differencebillion and a Brazilian Real sub-facility of $0.2 billion as a loss on extinguishment of debt.billion.

In September 2013November 2014 we issued $4.5$2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes comprising $1.5 billion of 3.5% notes due in 2018, $1.5 billion of 4.875% notes due in 2023 and $1.5 billion of 6.25% notes due in 2043. Wenotes. In December 2014 we used proceeds from the issuance of these notes plus available cash to purchase 120 millionredeem all of the remaining outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock from the New VEBA for a total price of $3.9 billion which was equal to their aggregate liquidation amount, including accumulated dividends. The redemption reduced Net income attributable to common stockholders by $0.8 billion.


46
39



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

price of $3.2In the year ended December 31, 2014 GM Financial issued $3.5 billion, which was equal to 108.1% of theirEuro 500 million and CAD 400 million in aggregate liquidation amount. The Series A Preferred Stock accrues cumulative dividends at a 9% annual rate. We recorded a loss for the difference between the carryingprincipal amount on senior unsecured notes. In January 2015 GM Financial issued $2.25 billion in aggregate principal amount of the Series A Preferred Stock purchased of $2.4 billion and the consideration paid of $3.2 billion, which reduced Net income attributable to common stockholders by $0.8 billion.

In October 2013 we used proceeds from the issuance of the senior unsecured notes to make a paymentcomprising $1.0 billion of $1.23.15% notes due in January 2020, $1.0 billion to prepayof 4.0% notes issued to the HCT. The HCTdue in January 2025 and $250 million of floating rate notes accrued interest at a 7% annual rate. This transaction and the purchase of the Series A Preferred Stock from the New VEBA lowered our overall cost of funding as the senior unsecured notes carry a lower interest rate than the dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock and the interest rate on the HCT notes.

In December 2013 we sold our investmentdue in Ally Financial’s common stock for $0.9 billion. Also in December 2013 we sold our seven percent equity stake in PSA for $0.3 billion. These transactions released capital from non-core investment assets and allow the funds to be used for other corporate purposes.January 2020.

Automotive

Available Liquidity

Total available liquidity includes cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and funds available under revolving credit facilities. At December 31, 2013 our total available liquidity was $38.3 billion, including funds available under credit facilities of $10.4 billion. The amount of available liquidity is subject to intra-month and seasonal fluctuations and includes balances held by various business units and subsidiaries worldwide that are needed to fund their operations.

We manage our liquidity primarily at our treasury centers as well as at certain of our significant consolidated overseas subsidiaries. Available liquidity held within North America and at our regional treasury centers represented approximately 84%87% of our available liquidity at December 31, 2013.2014. A portion of our available liquidity includes amounts deemed indefinitely reinvested in our foreign subsidiaries. We have used and will continue to use other methods including intercompany loans to utilize these funds across our global operations as needed.

Our cash equivalents and marketable securities balances are primarily denominated in U.S. Dollars and include investments in U.S. government and agency obligations, foreign government securities, time deposits and corporate debt securities, and are primarily denominated in U.S. Dollars. We expect to maintain a sufficient amount of CAD denominated cash investments to offset certain CAD denominated liabilities, which primarily relate to pension and OPEB liabilities. These cash investments will incur foreign currency exchange gains or losses based on the movement of the CAD in relation to the U.S. Dollar and will therefore reduce our net CAD foreign currency exchange exposure. We held cash investments in CAD denominated securities of $1.7 billion at December 31, 2013. These funds continue to be available to fund our normal ongoing operations and are included in our available liquidity.

securities. Our investment guidelines, which we may change from time to time, prescribe certain minimum credit worthiness thresholds and limit our exposures to any particular sector, asset class, issuance or security type. Substantially all of our current investments in debt securities are with A/A2 or better rated issuers.

We use credit facilities as a mechanism to provide additional flexibility in managing our global liquidity and to fund working capital needs at certain of our subsidiaries. The total size of our credit facilities was $12.6 billion and $11.2 billion and $11.4 billion at December 31, 20132014 and 2012. Our primary borrowing capacity under credit facilities comes from our secured2013 which consisted primarily of the revolving credit facilities comprising a three-year, $5.5 billion facility maturing in 2015 and a five-year, $5.5 billion facility maturing in 2017.previously disclosed. We havedid not borrowedborrow against theseour two primary facilities, but havehad amounts in use under the letter of credit sub-facility of $0.6$0.5 billion at December 31, 2013.2014. At December 31, 2014 GM Financial has not borrowed againsthad access to the three-year facility. Refer to Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for additional details on our secured revolving credit facilities.facilities, but did not borrow against them. In September 2014 the collateral previously securing these revolving credit facilities was released upon obtaining an investment grade corporate rating from both Moody's Investor Service (Moody's) and Standard & Poor's (S&P).

The following table summarizes our automotive available liquidity (dollars in millions)billions):
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Cash and cash equivalents$16.0
 $18.9
Marketable securities9.2
 9.0
Available liquidity25.2
 27.9
Available under credit facilities12.0
 10.4
Total automotive available liquidity$37.2
 $38.3

The following table summarizes the changes in our automotive available liquidity (dollars in billions):

47
40



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Cash and cash equivalents$18,947
 $17,133
Marketable securities8,972
 8,988
Available liquidity27,919
 26,121
Available under credit facilities10,404
 11,119
Total available liquidity$38,323
 $37,240

The following table summarizes the changes in our automotive available liquidity (dollars in billions):
 Year Ended 2013 vs 2012
Operating cash flow$11.0
Less: capital expenditures(7.5)
Sale of investments in Ally Financial and PSA1.2
Capital contribution to GM Financial for the acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations(1.3)
Dividends paid(0.9)
Decrease in available credit facilities(0.7)
Effect of foreign currency(0.4)
Other(0.3)
Total change in available liquidity$1.1
 Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change
Operating cash flow$10.1
Capital expenditures(7.0)
Issuance of senior unsecured notes2.5
Redemption of Series A Preferred Stock(3.9)
Dividends paid (excluding charge related to redemption of Series A Preferred Stock)(2.4)
Increase in available credit facilities1.6
Effect of foreign currency(1.1)
Capital contribution to GM Financial for the acquisition of Ally Financial's equity interest in SAIC-GMAC(0.7)
Other(0.2)
Total change in automotive available liquidity$(1.1)

Cash Flow

The following tables summarize automotive cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities (dollars in billions):
Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change
Years Ended December 31,2014 2013 2012 
Operating Activities
2013 2012 2011         
Net income$4.7
 $5.6
 $8.9
$3.5
 $4.7
 $5.6
 $(1.2) $(0.9)
Depreciation, amortization and impairments7.6
 38.5
 7.3
6.3
 7.6
 38.5
 (1.3) (30.9)
Pension & OPEB activities(0.8) (0.5) (3.0)(0.9) (0.8) (0.5) (0.1) (0.3)
Working capital(0.5) (0.7) (2.2)(1.6) (0.5) (0.7) (1.1) 0.2
Equipment on operating leases(1.9) (1.0) 0.4
 (0.9) (1.4)
Accrued liabilities and other liabilities6.0
 0.7
 1.0
 5.3
 (0.3)
Deferred tax valuation allowance release in the U.S. and Canada
 (36.3) 

 
 (36.3) 
 36.3
Other
 3.0
 (3.6)(1.3) 0.3
 1.6
 (1.6) (1.3)
Cash flows from operating activities$11.0
 $9.6
 $7.4
Automotive cash flows from operating activities$10.1
 $11.0
 $9.6
 $(0.9) $1.4

Depreciation, amortizationIn the year ended December 31, 2014 the change in accrued liabilities and impairments included goodwill impairments of $0.5 billion, $27.1 billionother liabilities was due primarily to recalls and $1.3 billion and impairment charges of property and intangible assets of $1.4 billion, $5.5 billion and $0.1 billiondeposits from rental car companies. The change in other was primarily related to deferred tax benefit in 2014 compared to deferred tax expense in 2013.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 2012the change in depreciation, amortization and 2011. In the year ended December 31, 2012 significant Pension and OPEB activities included contributions to the U.S. salaried pension plan of $2.3 billion for the purchase of annuity contracts and associated pension settlement charges of $2.7 billion. In the year ended December 31, 2011 significant Pension and OPEB activities included a cash contribution as part of the HCT settlement of $0.8 billion and a gain associated with the HCT settlement of $0.7 billion. In the year ended December 31, 2012 Otherimpairments was due primarily to favorable movementsgoodwill impairment in dealer and customer allowancesGMNA of $0.9 billion, other deferred tax provisions of $0.9$26.4 billion and policy and warrantyproperty impairment in GME of $0.6 billion. In the year ended December 31, 2011$3.7 billion recorded in 2012. The change in Other was due primarily related to gainsgain on the sale of our investmentsinvestment in New Delphi Class A Membership Interests and Ally Financial preferred stock of $2.0 billion, unfavorable movementsand changes in accrued and other liabilities of $0.7 billion and equipment on operating leases of $0.5 billion.our investment in PSA.

 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change
 2014 2013 2012  
Investing Activities
         
Capital expenditures$(7.0) $(7.5) $(8.1) $0.5
 $0.6
Liquidations (acquisitions) of marketable securities, net(0.4) 0.1
 6.9
 (0.5) (6.8)
Sale of our investment in Ally Financial
 0.9
 
 (0.9) 0.9
Other0.2
 0.4
 0.5
 (0.2) (0.1)
Automotive cash flows from investing activities$(7.2) $(6.1) $(0.7) $(1.1) $(5.4)


48
41



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ended December 31,
Investing Activities
2013 2012 2011
Capital expenditures$(7.5) $(8.1) $(6.2)
Liquidations (acquisitions) of marketable securities, net0.1
 6.9
 (10.6)
Sale of our investment in Ally Financial0.9
 
 1.0
Sale of our investment in Delphi
 
 3.8
Other0.4
 0.5
 1.4
Cash flows from investing activities$(6.1) $(0.7) $(10.6)

ChangesIn the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 the change in the (Acquisitions) liquidations of marketable securities net were due to varying maturitieswas primarily a result of investments as we rebalancedrebalancing our investment portfolio between marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents as part of liquidity management in the normal course of business. Other was due primarily to the release of restricted cash, including the release of $1.0 billion associated with the implementation of the HCT in
 Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change
 2014 2013 2012  
Financing Activities
         
Issuance of senior unsecured notes$2.5
 $4.5
 $
 $(2.0) $4.5
Prepayment of Canadian Health Care Trust (HCT) notes (principal)
 (1.1) 
 1.1
 (1.1)
Early redemption of GM Korea preferred stock
 (0.7) (0.7) 0.7
 
Redemption and purchase of Series A Preferred Stock(3.9) (3.2) 
 (0.7) (3.2)
Purchase of Common Stock(0.2) 
 (5.1) (0.2) 5.1
Dividends paid (excluding charge related to redemption and purchase of Series A Preferred Stock)(2.4) (0.9) (0.9) (1.5) 
Other(0.1) 
 (0.4) (0.1) 0.4
Automotive cash flows from financing activities$(4.1) $(1.4) $(7.1) $(2.7) $5.7

In the year ended December 31, 2011.

 Years Ended December 31,
Financing Activities
2013 2012 2011
Issuance of senior unsecured notes$4.5
 $
 $
Prepayment of HCT notes(1.1) 
 
Early redemption of GM Korea preferred stock(0.7) (0.7) 
Purchase of Series A Preferred Stock(3.2) 
 
Purchase of Common Stock (excluding charge related to purchase premium)
 (5.1) 
Dividends paid (excluding charge related to purchase of series A Preferred Stock)(0.9) (0.9) (0.9)
Other
 (0.4) (1.0)
Cash flows from financing activities$(1.4) $(7.1) $(1.9)

Other2014 the change in dividends paid was due primarily to prepayments onpayments for common stock dividends.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 the change in other was due primarily to net activity of debt facilities held by certain of our foreign subsidiaries, primarily in GMNAGMIO and GMSA, of $1.0 billion in the year ended December 31, 2011.GMSA.

Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow

The following table summarizes free cash flow and adjusted free cash flow (dollars in millions)billions):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Operating cash flow$11,021
 $9,631
 $7,429
$10.1
 $11.0
 $9.6
Less: capital expenditures(7,549) (8,055) (6,241)(7.0) (7.5) (8.0)
Free cash flow3,472
 1,576
 1,188
Adjustments225
 2,712
 1,830

 0.2
 2.7
Adjusted free cash flow$3,697
 $4,288
 $3,018
$3.1
 $3.7
 $4.3

Adjustments to free cash flow includedincluded: (1) pension contributions related to the following items:previously announced annuitization of the U.S. salaried pension plan in August 2014 and March 2013 of $0.1 billion; (2) accrued interest on the prepayment of the HCT notes of $0.2 billion in October 20132013; and pension contributions of $0.1 billion related to the previously announced annuitization of the U.S. salaried pension plan in March 2013;(3) voluntary contributions to the U.S. salaried pension plan of $2.3 billion for the purchase of annuity contracts of $2.3 billion and the premium paid to purchase our common stock from the USTUnited States Department of the Treasury of $0.4 billion in December 2012; termination of in-transit wholesale advance agreement in GMNA resulting in an increase to accounts receivable of $1.1 billion and OPEB payments relating to the HCT settlement of $0.8 billion in 2011.2012.

Status of Credit Ratings


49



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

We receive ratings from four independent credit rating agencies: DBRS Limited, Fitch Ratings (Fitch), Moody's Investor Service (Moody's) and S&P. DBRS Limited, Moody's and Moody'sS&P currently rate our corporate credit at investment grade while Fitch and S&P currently raterates our corporate credit at non-investment grade. The following table summarizes our credit ratings at January 30, 2014:2015:
 Corporate Secured Revolving Credit Facilities Senior Unsecured Outlook
DBRS LimitedBBB (low) N/ABBB (low) N/A Stable
FitchBB+ BBB-BB+ BB+ Positive
Moody'sInvestment Grade Baa2Baa3 Ba1 Stable
S&PBB+BBB- BBBBBB- BB+BBB- PositiveStable


42



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Rating actions taken by each of the credit rating agencies from January 1, 20132014 through January 30, 20142015 were as follows:

DBRS Limited: Assigned revolving credit facilities rating of BBB (low) in October 2014.

Fitch: September - Assigned a senior unsecured rating of BB+. August - Upgraded their outlook to positive from stable.our senior unsecured notes issued in November 2014. Assigned revolving credit facilities rating of BB+ in October 2014.

Moody’s: September -Assigned a rating of Ba1 to our senior unsecured notes issued in November 2014. Assigned revolving credit facilities rating of Baa3 in October 2014.

S&P: Assigned a rating of BBB- to our senior unsecured notes issued in November 2014. Assigned revolving credit facilities rating of BBB- in October 2014. Upgraded our corporate rating and senior unsecured rating to an investment grade rating of Baa3BBB- from Ba1, assigned a senior unsecured rating of Ba1BB+ and changedrevised their outlook to stableStable from positive.Positive in September 2014.

S&P: September - Assigned a senior unsecured rating of BB+ and upgraded their outlook to positive from stable.

We continue to pursue investment grade status from all of theImproving credit rating agencies by maintaining a balance sheet with minimal financial leverage and demonstrating continued operating performance. Achieving investment grade status will provideratings provides us with greater financial flexibility and a lower our cost of borrowing and may releaseborrowing. Additionally the collateral from certain agreements includingformerly pledged to our secured revolving credit facility.facilities was released in conjunction with achieving investment grade status from both Moody’s and S&P.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial

Liquidity Overview

GM Financial's primary sources of cash are finance charge income, leasing income, servicing fees, net distributions from secured debt, borrowings under secured and unsecured debt net proceeds from senior notes transactionsborrowings and collections and recoveries on finance receivables. GM Financial's primary uses of cash are purchases of finance receivables and leased vehicles, funding of commercial finance receivables, business acquisitions, repayment of secured and unsecured debt, funding credit enhancement requirements for secured debt, operating expenses and interest costs. GM Financial continues to monitor and evaluate opportunities to optimize its liquidity position and the mix of its debt.

Available Liquidity

The following table summarizes GM Financial's available liquidity for daily operations (dollars in millions)billions):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Cash and cash equivalents$1,074
 $1,289
$3.0
 $1.1
Borrowing capacity on unpledged eligible assets1,650
 1,349
4.8
 1.6
Borrowing capacity on committed unsecured lines of credit615
 
0.5
 0.6
Available liquidity$3,339
 $2,638
$8.3
 $3.3

The increase in available liquidity is due primarily to the net increaseissuance of $0.8$4.5 billion resultingof senior unsecured notes in the year ended December 31, 2014, as well as the capital contribution from GM of $0.7 billion for the purchase of Ally Financial international operations acquisition.Financial's equity interests in SAIC-GMAC.

As previously mentioned GM Financial has the ability to borrow up to $4.0$2.0 billion against each of our three-year, $5.5$5.0 billion securedand five-year, $7.5 billion revolving credit facility subject to available capacityfacilities. In September 2014 we and borrowing base restrictions. In the event GM Financial borrows against the facility, it is expected such borrowings would be short-term in nature. The facility is not guaranteed or secured byentered into a support agreement which, among other things, established commitments of funding from us to GM Financial. This agreement also provides that we will continue to own all of GM Financial’s outstanding voting shares so long as any unsecured debt securities remain outstanding at GM Financial. In addition we are required to use our commercially reasonable efforts to ensure GM Financial assets or subsidiaries.remains a subsidiary borrower under our corporate revolving credit facilities.

Credit Facilities


50



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

In the normal course of business, in addition to using its available cash, GM Financial utilizes borrowings under its credit facilities, which may be secured and structured as securitizations, or may be unsecured, and GM Financial repays these borrowings as appropriate under its cash management strategy. At December 31, 20132014 secured and committed unsecured credit facilities totaled $15.6$18.8 billion and $4.0$1.3 billion,, with advances outstanding of $9.0$7.0 billion and $3.0 billion.$0.8 billion.

43


GM Financial is required to hold certain funds in restricted cash accounts to provide additional collateral for borrowings under certain secured credit facilities. GM Financial’s secured credit facilities contain various covenants requiring minimum financial ratios, asset quality and portfolio performance ratios (portfolio net loss and delinquency ratios, and pool level cumulative net loss ratios) as well as limits on deferment levels. Failure to meet any

Table of these covenants could result in an event of default under these agreements. If an event of default occurs under these agreements, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under these agreements to be immediately due and payable, enforce their interests against collateral pledged under these agreements, restrict GM Financial’s ability to obtain additional borrowings under these agreements and/or remove GM Financial as servicer. At December 31, 2013 GM Financial was in compliance with all covenants related to its credit facilities.Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Cash Flow

The following table summarizes GM Financial cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities (dollars in millions)billions):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31, Year Ended 2014 vs. 2013 Change Year Ended 2013 vs. 2012 Change
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012 
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,609
 $974
 $737
$1.9
 $1.6
 $1.0
 $0.3
 $0.6
Net cash used in investing activities$(8,215) $(2,776) $(2,112)$(10.5) $(8.2) $(2.8) $(2.3) $(5.4)
Net cash provided by financing activities$5,143
 $2,318
 $1,520
$9.8
 $5.1
 $2.3
 $4.7
 $2.8

Operating Activities

In the year ended December 31, 2014 net cash provided by operating activities increased due primarily to larger finance receivable and lease portfolios.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 net cash provided by operating activities increased by $0.6 billion due primarily to the acquisitions of the Ally Financial international operations.

Investing Activities

In the year ended December 31, 20122014 net cash provided by operatingused in investing activities increased by $0.2 billion due primarily to higher revenues resulting from a $2.4 billion increase in average earning assets.to: (1) increased loan purchases and funding, net of collections, of $2.6 billion; and (2) increased purchases of leased vehicles of $2.5 billion; partially offset by (3) decreased cash used for business acquisitions of $2.6 billion.

Investing Activities

In the year ended December 31, 2013 net cash used in investing activities increased by $5.4 billion due primarily to: (1) increased funding of commercial finance receivables of $19.9 billion and purchase of consumer finance receivables of $4.0 billion; (2) net cash payment of $2.6 billion made in the current year on the acquisitions of the Ally Financial international operations; (3) increased purchasepurchases of leased vehicles of $1.2 billion; and (4) an increase in restricted cash of $0.6 billion; partially offset by (5) increased collections and recoveries on finance receivables of $22.8 billion.

Financing Activities

In the year ended December 31, 20122014 net cash used in investingprovided by financing activities increased by $0.7 billion due primarily to: (1) increased fundingborrowings under secured and unsecured debt of commercial finance receivables of $1.2 billion and purchase of consumer finance receivables of $0.6$5.6 billion; and (2) increased purchaserepayment of leased vehiclesdebt to Ally Financial of $0.2 billion;$1.4 billion in 2013, with no related activity in 2014; partially offset by (3) increased collections and recoveries on finance receivablesdebt repayment of $1.0$2.8 billion.

Financing Activities

In the year ended December 31, 2013 net cash provided by financing activities increased by $2.8 billion due primarily to theto: (1) increased borrowings under secured and unsecured debt and issuance of senior notes of $14.0 billion,billion; partially offset by the(2) increased debt repayment of $9.7 billionbillion; and (3) the repayment of $1.4 billion in certain debt assumed as part of the acquisitions of the Ally Financial international operations acquisitions.operations.

In the year ended December 31, 2012 net cash provided by financing activities increased by $0.8 billion due primarily to a decrease in repayment of debt.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan Contributions

51



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Eligible U.S. salaried employees hired prior to January 2001 participated in a defined benefit pension plan which was frozen as of September 30, 2012. All eligible salaried employees now participate in a defined contribution plan. Hourly employees hired prior to October 2007 generally participate in plans which provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service as well as supplemental benefits for employees who retire with 30 years of service before normal retirement age. Hourly employees hired after September 2007 participate in a defined contribution plan. Our policy for qualified defined benefit pension plans is to contribute annually not less than the minimum required by applicable law and regulation, or to directly pay benefit payments where appropriate. At December 31, 2013 all legal funding requirements had been met. We expect to contribute $0.1 billion to our U.S. non-qualified plans and $0.7 billion to our non-U.S. pension plans in 2014.

The following table summarizes contributions made to the defined benefit pension plans or direct payments (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
U.S. hourly and salaried$128
 $2,420
 $1,962
Non-U.S.886
 855
 836
Total contributions$1,014
 $3,275
 $2,798

We provided short-term, interest-free, unsecured loans of $2.2 billion to provide the U.S. salaried defined benefit pension plan with incremental liquidity to pay ongoing benefits and administrative costs. Through December 31, 2013 contributions of $1.7 billion were made from the $2.2 billion loans and the remaining amounts were repaid.

We made a voluntary contribution in January 2011 to our U.S. hourly and salaried defined benefit pension plans of 61 million shares of our common stock valued at $2.2 billion for funding purposes at the time of contribution. The contributed shares qualified as a plan asset for funding purposes at the time of contribution and as a plan asset valued at $1.9 billion for accounting purposes in July 2011. This was a voluntary contribution above our funding requirements for the pension plans.

The following table summarizes the underfunded status of pension plans on a U.S. GAAP basis (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
U.S. hourly and salaried$6,552
 $13,148
U.S. nonqualified762
 877
Total U.S. pension plans7,314
 14,025
Non-U.S.12,542
 13,760
Total underfunded$19,856
 $27,785

The decrease in underfunded status of the U.S. pension plans was due primarily to: (1) actuarial gains due primarily to discount rate increases of $7.7 billion; (2) actual return on plan assets of $2.1 billion; and (3) contributions of $0.1 billion; partially offset by (4) service and interest costs of $3.1 billion.

The decrease in underfunded status of the non-U.S. pension plans primarily in Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany was due primarily to: (1) actuarial gains due primarily to discount rate increases of $1.0 billion; (2) actual return on plan assets of $1.0 billion; and (3) contributions and benefit payments of $0.9 billion; partially offset by (4) service and interest costs of $1.4 billion; (5) net unfavorable foreign currency effect of $0.2 billion; and (6) business combinations of $0.1 billion.

Hourly and salaried OPEB plans provide postretirement life insurance to certain U.S. retirees and eligible dependents and postretirement health coverage to some U.S. retirees and eligible dependents. Certain of the non-U.S. subsidiaries have postretirement benefit plans, although most participants are covered by government sponsored or administered programs.

The following table summarizes the unfunded status of OPEB plans (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
U.S. OPEB plans$5,110
 $6,271
Non-U.S. OPEB plans1,238
 1,528
Total unfunded$6,348
 $7,799

52



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Refer to Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for the change in benefit obligations and related plan assets.

The following table summarizes net benefit payments expected to be paid in the future, which include assumptions related to estimated future employee service (dollars in millions):
  Pension Benefits(a) Other Benefits
  U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
2014 $5,780
 $1,609
 $376
 $77
2015 $5,687
 $1,597
 $364
 $65
2016 $5,475
 $1,688
 $352
 $65
2017 $5,368
 $1,711
 $341
 $65
2018 $5,210
 $1,581
 $332
 $66
2019 - 2023 $24,019
 $7,858
 $1,576
 $357
__________
(a)Benefits for most U.S. pension plans and certain non-U.S. pension plans are paid out of plan assets rather than our Cash and cash equivalents.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently utilize off-balance sheet securitization arrangements. All trade or financing receivables and related obligations subject to securitization programs are recorded on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013.

Guarantees Provided to Third Parties

We have provided guarantees related to the residual value of operating leases, certain suppliers' commitments, certain product-related claims and third party commercial loans and other obligations. The maximum potential obligation under these commitments was $16.9 billion and $23.5 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Refer to Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on guarantees we have provided.

Contractual Obligations and Other Long-Term Liabilities

We have the following minimum commitments under contractual obligations, including purchase obligations. A purchase obligation is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Other long-term liabilities are defined as long-term liabilities that are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet. Based on this definition, the following table includes only those contracts which include fixed or minimum obligations. The majority of our purchases are not included in the table as they are made under purchase orders which are requirements based and accordingly do not specify minimum quantities.


44



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

The following table summarizes aggregated information about our outstanding contractual obligations and other long-term liabilities at December 31, 20132014 (dollars in millions):

53



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 2019 and after Total2015 2016-2017 2018-2019 2020 and after Total
Automotive debt$389
 $26
 $1,781
 $4,741
 $6,937
$323
 $252
 $1,599
 $6,949
 $9,123
Automotive Financing debt13,594
 10,672
 4,030
 750
 29,046
14,491
 16,432
 4,526
 2,000
 37,449
Capital lease obligations154
 230
 297
 284
 965
180
 433
 110
 245
 968
Automotive interest payments(a)362
 635
 552
 2,944
 4,493
447
 882
 732
 5,093
 7,154
Automotive Financing interest payments(b)766
 833
 232
 141
 1,972
955
 1,171
 322
 199
 2,647
Postretirement benefits(c)259
 279
 3
 
 541
235
 25
 
 
 260
Contractual commitments for capital expenditures224
 
 
 
 224
252
 
 
 
 252
Operating lease obligations311
 397
 173
 206
 1,087
295
 355
 205
 148
 1,003
Other contractual commitments:                  
Material947
 991
 117
 30
 2,085
856
 975
 116
 238
 2,185
Marketing1,089
 780
 267
 181
 2,317
979
 659
 235
 101
 1,974
Rental car repurchases3,761
 
 
 
 3,761
6,008
 
 
 
 6,008
Policy, product warranty and recall campaigns liability2,628
 3,266
 1,153
 246
 7,293
Other980
 522
 462
 670
 2,634
536
 563
 365
 901
 2,365
Total contractual commitments(d)(e)$25,464
 $18,631
 $9,067
 $10,193
 $63,355
Total contractual commitments(d)$25,557
 $21,747
 $8,210
 $15,874
 $71,388
                  
Non-contractual postretirement benefits(f)$194
 $567
 $801
 $11,136
 $12,698
Non-contractual postretirement benefits(e)$168
 $752
 $749
 $10,827
 $12,496
__________
(a)
Amounts include Automotiveautomotive interest payments based on contractual terms and current interest rates on our debt and capital lease obligations. Automotive interest payments based on variable interest rates were determined using the interest rate in effect at December 31, 2013.
2014.
(b)
GM Financial interest payments were determined using the interest rate in effect at December 31, 20132014 for floating rate debt and the contractual rates for fixed rate debt. GM Financial interest payments on floating rate tranches of the securitization notes payable were converted to a fixed rate based on the floating rate plus any expected hedge payments.
(c)Amounts include OPEBother postretirement employee benefits (OPEB) payments under the current U.S. contractual labor agreements through 2015 and Canada labor agreements through 2016. These agreements are generally renegotiated in the year of expiration. Amounts do not include pension funding obligations, which are discussed below under the caption “Pension Funding Requirements.“Critical Accounting Estimates - Pensions.
(d)
Amounts do not include future cash payments for long-term purchase obligations and other accrued expenditures (unless specifically listed in the table above) which were recorded in Accounts payable or Accrued liabilities at December 31, 2013.
2014.
(e)
Amounts exclude the future annual contingent obligations of Euro 265 million in the years 2013 to 2014 related to our Opel/Vauxhall restructuring plan. Refer to Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for further detail.
(f)
Amounts include all expected future payments for both current and expected future service at December 31, 20132014 for OPEB obligations for salaried employees and hourly OPEB obligations extending beyond the current North American union contract agreements. Amounts do not include pension funding obligations, which are discussed below under the caption “Pension Funding Requirements.“Critical Accounting Estimates - Pensions.

The table above does not reflect product warranty and related liabilities of $9.6 billion and unrecognized tax benefits of $2.5$1.9 billion due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the future cash outflows associated with these amounts.

Pension Funding Requirements

We have implemented and completed a balance sheet derisking strategy, comprising certain actions related to our U.S. salaried pension plan. These actions included payment of lump-sums to retirees, the purchase of group annuity contracts from an insurance company and the settlement of other previously guaranteed obligations.

We do not have any required contributions payable to our U.S. qualified plans in 2014. We expect to contribute $0.1 billion to our U.S. non-qualified plans and $0.7 billion to our non-U.S. pension plans in 2014.

Critical Accounting Estimates

TheAccounting estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, whichstatements. These estimates require the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses in the periods presented. We believe that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, due to the inherent uncertainties in

54



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

making estimates actual results could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to these balances in future periods. We have discussed the development, selection and disclosures ofRefer to Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for our significant accounting policies related to our critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosures relating to these estimates.

Pensions

TheOur defined benefit pension plans are accounted for on an actuarial basis, which requires the selection of various assumptions, including an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, and a discount rate.rate, mortality rates of participants and expectation of mortality improvement. The expected long-term rate of return on U.S. plan assets that is utilized in determining pension expense is derived from periodic studies, which include a review of asset allocation strategies, anticipated future long-term performance

45



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

of individual asset classes, risks using standard deviations and correlations of returns among the asset classes that comprise the plans' asset mix. While the studies give appropriate consideration to recent plan performance and historical returns, the assumptions are primarily long-term, prospective rates of return.

In December 20132014 an investment policy study was completed for the U.S. pension plans. The study resulted in new target asset allocations being approved for the U.S. pension plans with resulting changes to the expected long-term rate of return on assets. The weighted-average long-term rate of return on assets increaseddecreased from 5.8% at December 31, 2012 to 6.5% at December 31, 2013 due primarily to higher yields on fixed income securities.6.4% at December 31, 2014.

Another key assumption in determining net pension expense is the assumed discount rate to be used to discount plan obligations. We estimate this rate for U.S. plans using a cash flow matching approach, which uses projected cash flows matched to spot rates along a high quality corporate yield curve to determine the present value of cash flows to calculate a single equivalent discount rate.

Mortality assumptions for participants in our U.S. pension plans incorporate future mortality improvements from tables published by the Society of Actuaries (SOA). We periodically review the mortality experience of our U.S. pension plans’ participants against these assumptions. In the three months ended December 31, 2014 the SOA issued new mortality and mortality improvement tables that raise life expectancies and thereby indicate the amount of estimated aggregate benefit payments to our U.S. pension plans' participants is increasing. We have incorporated the new SOA mortality and mortality improvement tables into our December 31, 2014 measurement of our U.S. pension plans' benefit obligations. The change in these assumptions had the effect of increasing the December 31, 2014 U.S. pension plans' obligations by $2.2 billion.

Significant differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions may materially affect the pension obligations. The effects of actual results differing from assumptions and the changing of assumptions are included in unamortized net actuarial gains and losses that are subject to amortization to expense over future periods. The unamortized pre-tax actuarial gain (loss) on our pension plans was $1.4$(4.6) billion and $(6.2)$1.4 billion at December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. The change is due primarily to the decrease in discount rates and the change in mortality assumptions partially offset by actual asset returns in excess of assumed returns.

The underfunded status of the U.S. pension plans increased by $3.6 billion in the year ended December 31, 2014 to $10.9 billion at December 31, 2014 due primarily to: (1) an unfavorable effect of $5.9 billion from a decrease in discount rates; (2) an unfavorable effect of $2.2 billion from an increase in discount rates.life expectancies, resulting in an increase in the benefit obligations; and (3) interest and service cost of $3.3 billion; partially offset by (4) a favorable effect of $7.3 billion from actual returns on plan assets.

The following table illustrates the sensitivity to a change in certain assumptions for the pension plans, holding all other assumptions constant (dollars in millions):
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. PlansU.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
Effect on 2014 Pension Expense Effect on December 31, 2013 PBO Effect on 2014 Pension Expense Effect on December 31, 2013 PBOEffect on 2015 Pension Expense Effect on December 31, 2014 PBO Effect on 2015 Pension Expense Effect on December 31, 2014 PBO
25 basis point decrease in discount rate-$50 +$1,890 +$22 +$866-$100 +$2,080 +$49 +$946
25 basis point increase in discount rate+$50 -$1,830 -$21 -$821+$70 -$2,020 -$19 -$892
25 basis point decrease in expected rate of return on assets+$150 N/A +$36 N/A+$150 N/A +$35 N/A
25 basis point increase in expected rate of return on assets-$150 N/A -$36 N/A-$150 N/A -$35 N/A

Pursuant to the labor contract with the UAW, which expires in September 2015, a benefit unit represents the calculated pension payment associated with a specific benefit plan type. The following data illustrates the sensitivity of changes in pension expense and pension obligation due to changes in future benefit units based on the last remeasurement of the U.S. hourly pension plan at December 31, 20132014 (dollars in millions):


Effect on 2014 Pension Expense Effect on December 31, 2013 PBOEffect on 2015 Pension Expense Effect on December 31, 2014 PBO
Change in future benefit units 
One percentage point increase in benefit units+$69 +$206+$85 +$263
One percentage point decrease in benefit units-$66 -$200-$83 -$255

We are subject to a variety of U.S. federal rules and regulations which govern the manner in which we fund and administer our U.S. pension plans. Certain of these rules and regulations allow plan sponsors funding relief for U.S. pension plans through the application of higher funding interest rates. As a result, utilizing current assumptions, we expect no significant mandatory

46



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

contributions to our U.S. qualified pension plans for the next five years. We also maintain pension plans for employees in a number of countries outside the U.S. which are subject to local laws and regulations. Except for Canada and the United Kingdom, most non-U.S. pension laws and regulations do not have specific funding requirements.

Refer to Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for the expected weighted-averageadditional information on pension contributions, investment strategies and long-term rate of return, on plan assets, weighted-average discount rate, onthe change in benefit obligation and related plan obligationsassets and actual and expected return on plan assets.future net benefit payments. Refer to Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the inputs used to determine fair value for each significant asset class or category.

Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets


55



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

We evaluate the need for deferred tax asset valuation allowances based on a more likely than not standard. The ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods provided for in the tax law for each applicable tax jurisdiction. It is difficult to concludeThe assessment regarding whether a valuation allowance is not required when thereor should be adjusted is significant objectivebased on an evaluation of possible sources of taxable income and verifiablealso considers all available positive and negative evidence such as cumulative losses in recent years. We utilize a rolling three years of actual and current year anticipated results as the primary measure of cumulative losses in recent years.factors. Our accounting for deferred tax consequences represents our best estimate of future events. Changes in our current estimates, due to unanticipated eventsmarket conditions or otherwise,events, could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. At December 31, 2013 we retained valuation allowances of $10.8 billion againstability to utilize deferred tax assets primarily in GME and South Korea business units with losses and in the U.S. and Canada related primarily to capital loss tax attributes and state operating loss carryforwards.

assets. If law is enacted that reduces the U.S. statutory rate, we would record a significant reduction to the net deferred tax assets and a related increase to income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change.

Impairment of Goodwill

When applying fresh-start reporting, certain accounts, primarily employee benefit and income tax related, were recorded at amounts determined under specific U.S. GAAP rather than fair value and the difference between the U.S. GAAP and fair value amounts gave rise to goodwill, which is a residual. If all identifiable assets and liabilities had been recorded at fair value upon application of fresh-start reporting, no goodwill would have resulted. Goodwill established at fresh-start was $30.5 billion of which $30.4 billion has been impaired through December 31, 2013.

In the three months ended December 31, 2013 we performed our annual goodwill impairment testing as of October 1 for all reporting units with Goodwill. Our reporting units are GMNA, GME and various reporting units within the GMIO, GMSA and GM Financial segments. In the year ended December 31, 2013 we also performed event-driven goodwill impairment tests at various dates for certain of our reporting units. Based on our testing procedures we recorded Goodwill impairment charges of $0.5 billion in the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily associated with our GM Korea and GM India reporting units. Subsequent to the recording of the Goodwill impairment charges in the year ended December 31, 2013 we had Goodwill of $1.6 billion at December 31, 2013 which resulted primarily from the acquisition of AmeriCredit Corp in 2011.

Refer to Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on goodwill impairments.

For purposes of our 2013 annual impairment testing procedures at October 1, 2013 the estimated fair value of GM Financial’s North American reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount by 29%. Due to anticipated changes in GM Financial's business model to continue to introduce higher credit quality products into its lending portfolio, the initial equity retention ratio assumption of 12.5% was forecasted to decrease to 7.5% by 2018 in the discounted cash flow analysis utilized for goodwill impairment testing purposes. Having higher credit quality products comprising a larger percentage of GM Financial's lending portfolio will require less equity. GM Korea's fair value continued to be below its carrying amount and GM India’s carrying amount became negative.

The key assumptions utilized in determining the fair value-to-U.S. GAAP differences giving rise to the implied goodwill for the reporting units requiring a Step 2 analysis are: (1) the determination of our nonperformance risk; (2) interest rates; (3) estimates of our employee benefit related obligations; and (4) the estimated timing of the utilization of our deferred tax assets, including our determination whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be utilized. For the year ended December 31, 2013 GM Korea's goodwill assessment was most sensitive to our determination of estimates of our employee benefit related obligations and GM India’s was most sensitive to the estimated timing of the utilization of our deferred tax assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The carrying amount of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets to be held and used in the business are evaluated for impairment when events and circumstances warrant. If the carrying amount of a long-lived asset group is considered impaired, a loss is recorded based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value for the long-lived assets or in certain cases, the asset group to be held and used. Product-specific long-lived asset groups are tested for impairment at the platform or vehicle line level. Non-product-specific long-lived assets are tested for impairment on a reporting unit basis in GMNA and GME and tested at or within our various reporting units within our GMIO, GMSA and GM Financial segments.

In December 2013 we: (1) announced our plans to cease mainstream distribution of Chevrolet brand in Western and Central Europe in 2015 due to the challenging business model and difficult economic situation in Europe; (2) announced plans to cease manufacturing at Holden by the end of 2017; and (3) performed a strategic assessment of GM India in response to lower than

56



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

expected sales performance of our current product offerings in India, higher raw material costs, unfavorable foreign exchange rates and recent deterioration in local market conditions. These triggered long-lived asset impairment analyses so we performed recoverability tests on the long-lived assets associated with these asset groups. Our tests concluded that the associated long-lived assets were not recoverable as the resulting undiscounted cash flows were less than their carrying amounts. We develop anticipated cash flows from historical experience and internal business plans.

We estimated the fair values of the associated long-lived assets to determine the impairment amount. Fair value is determined using either the market or sales comparison approach, cost approach or anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. A considerable amount of management judgment was required in determining the fair value of the asset groups which requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, considered to be Level 3 inputs. An in-exchange premise was determined to be the highest and best use of the assets which is different than the assets' current use due to: (1) expected losses to be incurred associated with the exit of Chevrolet from a mainstream presence in Western and Central Europe and the wind down of manufacturing activities at Holden; and (2) the lack of economic support due to declining operations for the existing long-lived assets at GM India. As a result in the three months ended December 31, 2013 we recorded total asset impairment charges of $1.1 billion in GMIO. Refer to Notes 9 and 11 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on the impairment charges recorded and related fair value measurements.

While we believe our judgments and assumptions are reasonable, a change in assumptions underlying these estimates could result in a material effect to the consolidated financial statements. Long-lived assets could become impaired in the future as a result of declines in profitability due to significant changes in volume, pricing or costs.

Sales Incentives

The estimated effect of sales incentives to dealers and end customers is recorded as a reduction of Automotive net sales and revenue, and in certain instances, as an increase to Automotive cost of sales, at the later of the time of sale or announcement of an incentive program to dealers. There may be numerous types of incentives available at any particular time, including a choice of incentives for a specific model. Incentive programs are generally brand specific, model specific or sales region specific and are for specified time periods, which may be extended. Significant factors used in estimating the cost of incentives include the volume of vehicles that will be affected by the incentive programs offered by product, product mix, the rate of customer acceptance of any incentive program and the likelihood that an incentive program will be extended, all of which are estimated based on historical experience and assumptions concerning customer behavior and future market conditions. When an incentive program is announced, the number of vehicles in dealer inventory eligible for the incentive program is determined and a reduction of Automotive net sales and revenue or increase to Automotive cost of sales is recorded in the period in which the program is announced. If the actual number of affected vehicles differs from this estimate, or if a different mix of incentives is actually paid, the reduction in Automotive net sales and revenue or increase to Automotive cost of sales for sales incentives could be affected. There are a multitude of inputs affecting the calculation of the estimate for sales incentives and an increase or decrease of any of these variables could have a significant effect on recorded sales incentives.

Policy, Product Warranty and Recall Campaigns

TheWe have historically accrued estimated costs related to recall campaigns in GMNA when they are probable and reasonably estimable, which typically occurs once it is determined a specific recall campaign is needed and announced. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, following the significant increase in the number of vehicles subject to recall in GMNA, the results of our ongoing comprehensive safety review, additional engineering analysis, the creation of a new Global Product Integrity organization, the appointment of a new Global Vice President of Vehicle Safety responsible for the safety development of our vehicle systems and our overall commitment to customer satisfaction, we accumulated sufficient historical data in GMNA to support the use of an actuarial-based estimation technique for recall campaigns. As such we now accrue at the time of vehicle sale in GMNA the costs for recall campaigns. In the three months ended June 30, 2014 we recorded a catch-up adjustment of $0.9 billion in Automotive cost of sales to adjust the estimate for recall costs for previously sold vehicles. The change in estimate was treated as an adjustment for EBIT-adjusted reporting purposes. In the other regions, there is not sufficient historical data to support the application of an actuarial-based estimation technique and the estimated costs will continue to be accrued at the time when they are probable and reasonably estimable, which typically occurs once it is determined a specific recall campaign is needed and announced.

The estimates related to policy and product warranties are accrued at the time products are sold. Estimated costs related to product recalls based on a formal campaign soliciting return of that product are accrued when they are deemed to be probable and can be reasonably estimated. These estimates are established using historical information on the nature, frequency and average cost of claims of each vehicle line or each model year of the vehicle line and assumptions about future activity and events. However whereWhen little or no claims experience exists for a model year or a vehicle line, the estimate is based on comparable models. RevisionsThe

47



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

estimates related to recall campaigns accrued at the time of vehicle sale are made when necessaryestablished by applying a frequency times severity approach that considers the number of recall events, the number of vehicles per recall event, the assumed number of vehicles that will be brought in by customers for repair (take rate) and the cost per vehicle for each recall event. Estimates contemplate the nature, frequency and magnitude of historical events with consideration for changes in future expectations. Costs associated with campaigns not accrued at the time of vehicle sale are estimated based on changes in these factors.the per unit part and labor cost, number of units impacted and the take rate. Depending on part availability and time to complete repairs we may, from time-to-time, offer courtesy transportation at no cost to our customers. These estimates are re-evaluated on an ongoing basis.basis and based on the best available information, revisions are made when necessary. We actively studyconsider trends of claims and take action to improve vehicle quality and minimize claims.

In the six months ended June 30, 2014 we recorded charges of $2.5 billion for recall campaigns and courtesy transportation that have been separately announced and $0.9 billion related to the catch-up adjustment associated with a change in estimate. The catch-up adjustment and estimated amount accrued at the time of a vehicle sale for recall campaigns is most sensitive to the estimated number of recall events, the number of vehicles per recall event, the take rate, and the cost per vehicle for each recall event. The estimated cost of a recall campaign that is accrued on an individual basis is most sensitive to our estimated assumed take rate that is primarily developed based on our historical take rate experience. We believe the amounts recorded are adequate to cover the costs of these recall campaigns. A 10% increase in the estimated take rate for specifically announced recall campaigns would increase the estimated cost by approximately $0.2 billion.

Actual experience could differ from the amounts estimated requiring adjustments to these liabilities in future periods. Due to the uncertainty and potential volatility of the factors contributing to developing estimates, changes in our assumptions could materially affect our results of operations.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

Accounting standards not yet adopted are discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.

Forward-Looking Statements


57



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

In this report and in reports we subsequently file and have previously filed with the SEC on Forms 10-K and 10-Q and file or furnish on Form 8-K, and in related comments by our management, we use words like “anticipate,” “appears,” “approximately,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “designed,” “effect,” “estimate,” “evaluate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “initiative,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “priorities,” “project,” “pursue,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “when,” “would,” or the negative of any of those words or similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements that represent our current judgment about possible future events. In making these statements we rely on assumptions and analyses based on our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors we consider appropriate under the circumstances. We believe these judgments are reasonable, but these statements are not guarantees of any events or financial results, and our actual results may differ materially due to a variety of important factors, both positive and negative. These factors, which may be revised or supplemented in subsequent reports on SEC Forms 10-Q and 8-K, include among others the following:

Our ability to realize production efficiencies and to achieve reductions in costs as a result of our restructuring initiatives and labor modifications;
Our ability to maintain quality control over our vehicles and avoid material vehicle recalls;recalls and the cost and effect on our reputation and products;
Our ability to maintain adequate liquidity and financing sources including as required to fund our planned significant investment in new technology;
Our ability to realize successful vehicle applications of new technology;
Shortages of and increases or volatility in the price of oil, including as a result of political instability in the Middle East and African nations;
Our ability to continue to attract customers, particularly for our new products, including cars and crossover vehicles;
Availability of adequate financing on acceptable terms to our customers, dealers, distributors and suppliers to enable them to continue their business relationships with us;
The ability of our suppliers to deliver parts, systems and components without disruption and at such times to allow us to meet production schedules;
Our ability to manage the distribution channels for our products;

48



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Our ability to successfully restructure our European and consolidated international operations;operations and the health of the European economy;
The continued availability of both wholesale and retail financing from Ally Financial and its affiliates and other finance companies in markets in which we operate to support our ability to sell vehicles, which is dependent on those entities' ability to obtain funding and their continued willingness to provide financing;
Our continued ability to develop captive financing capability, including GM Financial;
GM Financial's ability to successfully integrate certain Ally Financial international operations;
Overall strength and stability of the automotive industry, both in the U.S. and in global markets, particularly Europe;markets;
Continued economic instability or poor economic conditions in the U.S., Europe and other global markets, including the credit markets, or changesChanges in economic conditions, commodity prices, housing prices, foreign currency exchange rates or political stability in the markets in which we operate;
Significant changes in the competitive environment, including the effect of competition and excess manufacturing capacity in our markets, on our pricing policies or use of incentives and the introduction of new and improved vehicle models by our competitors;
Significant changes in economic, political and market conditions in China, including the effect of competition from new market entrants, on our vehicle sales and market position in China;
Changes in the existing, or the adoption of new, laws, regulations, policies or other activities of governments, agencies and similar organizations particularly laws, regulations and policies relating to vehicle safety including recalls, and, including where such actions may affect the production, licensing, distribution or sale of our products, the cost thereof or applicable tax rates;
Costs and risks associated with litigation;litigation and government investigations including those related to our recent recalls;
Significant increases in our pension expense or projected pension contributions resulting from changes in the value of plan assets, the discount rate applied to value the pension liabilities or mortality or other assumption changes; and

58



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Changes in accounting principles, or their application or interpretation, and our ability to make estimates and the assumptions underlying the estimates, which could have an effect on earnings.

We caution readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or other factors that affect the subject of these statements, except where we are expressly required to do so by law.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Automotive

We enter into a variety of foreign currency exchange and commodity forward contracts and options to manage exposures arising from market risks resulting from changes in certain foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes.

The overall financial risk management program is under the responsibility of the Chief Financial Officer with support from the Financial Risk Management CommitteeCouncil which reviews and, where appropriate, approves strategies to be pursued to mitigate these risks. The Financial Risk Management CommitteeCouncil comprises members of our management and functions under the oversight of the Audit Committee a committeeand Finance Committee, committees of the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee assists and guidesFinance Committee assist and guide the Board of Directors in its oversight of our financial and risk management strategies. A risk management control framework is utilized to monitor the strategies, risks and related hedge positions in accordance with the policies and procedures approved by the Financial Risk Management Committee.Council. Our risk management policy intends to protect against risk arising from extreme adverse market movements on our key exposures.

The following analyses provide quantitative information regarding exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Sensitivity analysis is used to measure the potential loss in the fair value of financial instruments with exposure to market risk. The models used assume instantaneous, parallel shifts in exchange rates and interest rate yield curves. For options and other instruments with nonlinear returns, models appropriate to these types of instruments are utilized to determine the effect of market shifts. There are certain shortcomings inherent in the sensitivity analyses presented, due primarily to the assumption that interest rates change in a parallel fashion and that spot exchange rates change instantaneously. In addition the analyses are unable to reflect the complex market reactions that normally would arise from the market shifts modeled and do not contemplate the effects of correlations between foreign currency pairs or offsetting long-short positions in currency pairs which may significantly reduce the potential loss in value.

49



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We have foreign currency exposures related to buying, selling and financing in currencies other than the functional currencies of the operations. At December 31, 20132014 our most significant foreign currency exposures were the Euro/U.S. Dollar, Euro/British Pound, U.S. Dollar/Korean Won, Euro/South Korean Won and Euro/U.S. Dollar.Dollar/Mexican Peso. Derivative instruments such as foreign currency forwards, swaps and options are used primarily to hedge exposures with respect to forecasted revenues, costs and commitments denominated in foreign currencies. At December 31, 20132014 such contracts had remaining maturities of up to 23 months.
 
At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 the net fair value liability of financial instruments with exposure to foreign currency risk was $1.0$0.9 billion and $4.0$1.0 billion. This presentation utilizes a population of foreign currency exchange derivatives, embedded derivatives and foreign currency denominated debt and excludes the offsetting effect of foreign currency cash, cash equivalents and other assets. The potential loss in fair value for such financial instruments from a 10% adverse change in all quoted foreign currency exchange rates would be $195 million and $671 million$0.2 billion at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013.

We are exposed to foreign currency risk due to the translation and remeasurement of the results of certain international operations into U.S. Dollars as part of the consolidation process. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can therefore create volatility in the results of operations and may adversely affect our financial condition.

The following table summarizes the amounts of automotive foreign currency translation and transaction and remeasurement losses (dollars in millions):

59



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 20122014 2013
Foreign currency translation losses recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss$729
 $118
$19
 $729
Losses resulting from foreign currency transactions and remeasurements recorded in earnings$352
 $117
$430
 $352

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates related to certain financial instruments, primarily debt, capital lease obligations and certain marketable securities. At December 31, 2014 and 2013 we did not have any interest rate swap positions to manage interest rate exposures in our automotive operations. At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 the fair value liability of debt and capital leases was $6.8$9.8 billion and $5.36.8 billion. The potential increase in fair value resulting from a 10% decrease in quoted interest rates would be $251 million$0.4 billion and $112 million$0.3 billion at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013.

At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 we had marketable securities of $8.0 billion and $7.2 billion and $3.8 billionclassified as available-for saleavailable-for-sale and $1.7$1.3 billion and $5.2$1.7 billion classified as trading. The potential decrease in fair value from a 50 basis point increase in interest rates would be insignificant at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial

Interest Rate Risk

Fluctuations in market interest rates can affect GM Financial's secured and unsecured debt. GM Financial's gross interest rate spread, which is the difference between: (1) interest earned on finance receivables, other income and lease contracts;receivables; and (2) interest paid ison debt, and could be affected by changes in interest rates. Typically consumer finance receivables purchased by GM Financial bear fixed interest rates as a result ofand are funded by variable or fixed rate debt. Commercial finance receivables originated by GM Financial's dependence upon the issuance ofFinancial bear variable interest rates and are funded by variable rate securities and the incurrence ofdebt. The variable rate debt is subject to fund purchases of finance receivables and leased vehicles.

Credit Facilitiesadjustments to reflect prevailing market interest rates. To help mitigate interest rate risk or mismatched funding, GM Financial may employ hedging strategies to lock in the interest rate spread.

Fixed interest rate receivables purchased by GM Financial are pledged to secure borrowings under its credit facilities. Amounts borrowed under these credit facilities bear interest at variable rates that are subject to frequent adjustments to reflect prevailing market interest rates. To protect the interest rate spread within each credit facility, GM Financial is contractually required to enter into interest rate cap agreements in connection with borrowings under its credit facilities.


Securitizations
50



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

In GM Financial's securitization transactions it can transfer fixed rate finance receivables to securitization trusts that, in turn, sell either fixed rate or floating rate securities to investors. Derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps and caps, are used to manage the gross interest rate spread on the floating rate transactions.

GM Financial had interest rate swaps and caps in asset positions with notional amounts of $3.8$3.8 billion and $0.8$3.8 billion at December 31, 2013 and2012. GM Financial had interest rate swaps and caps in liability positions with notional amounts of $5.5$7.4 billion and $0.8$5.5 billion at December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. The fair value of these derivative financial instruments was insignificant.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

GM Financial is exposed to foreign currency risk due to the translation and remeasurement of the results of certain international operations, primarily those acquired from Ally Financial at various dates in 2013, into U.S. Dollars as part of the consolidation process. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can therefore create volatility in the results of operations and may adversely affectThe following table summarizes GM Financial's financial condition.

In connection withinterest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, excluding derivatives, by year of expected maturity and the closing of certain acquisitions of Ally Financial's international operations, GM Financial provided loans denominated in foreign currencies (Euro, British Pound and Swedish Krona) to acquired entities that had an equivalent balance of $1.7 billion at December 31, 2013. GM Financial purchased foreign exchange swaps to offset any valuation change in the loans due to changes in foreign exchange rates. The fair value of these foreign exchange swaps was insignificant.those assets and liabilities at December 31, 2014 (dollars in millions):
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Fair Value
Assets             
Consumer finance receivables             
Principal amounts$10,440
 $7,336
 $4,551
 $2,308
 $968
 $382
 $25,541
Weighted-average annual percentage rate10.26% 10.45% 10.56% 10.82% 11.04% 11.21%  
Commercial finance receivables             
Principal amounts$7,333
 $79
 $69
 $87
 $76
 $51
 $7,565
Weighted-average annual percentage rate6.17% 4.63% 4.41% 4.36% 4.38% 4.67%  
              
Liabilities             
Secured Debt:             
Credit facilities             
Principal amounts$4,532
 $1,593
 $757
 $141
 $17
 $
 $6,991
Weighted-average interest rate4.36% 5.92% 6.34% 8.63% 8.87% %  
Securitization notes             
Principal amounts$7,348
 $5,703
 $3,596
 $1,190
 $354
 $
 $18,237
Weighted-average interest rate1.94% 1.86% 2.04% 2.50% 3.06% %  
Unsecured Debt:             
Senior notes             
Principal amounts$
 $1,000
 $2,795
 $1,250
 $1,405
 $2,000
 $8,707
Weighted-average interest rate% 2.75% 3.56% 4.65% 2.80% 4.33%  
Credit facilities and other unsecured debt             
Principal amounts$2,611
 $881
 $107
 $85
 $84
 $
 $3,772
Weighted-average interest rate10.33% 9.70% 5.64% 5.14% 5.14% %  

The following table summarizes GM Financial's interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, excluding derivatives, by year of expected maturity and the fair value of those assets and liabilities at December 31, 2013 (dollars in millions):


60
51



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 Years Ending December 31, December 31, 2013
 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Fair Value
Assets             
Consumer finance receivables             
Principal amounts$9,576
 $6,642
 $4,162
 $2,050
 $820
 $290
 $22,652
Weighted-average annual percentage rate10.76% 10.97% 11.17% 11.73% 12.28% 12.80%  
Commercial finance receivables             
Principal amounts$5,731
 $22
 $25
 $94
 $117
 $6
 $6,016
Weighted-average annual percentage rate6.82% 4.73% 4.59% 4.50% 7.40% 5.69%  
              
Liabilities             
Credit facilities             
Principal amounts$6,297
 $1,699
 $796
 $224
 $19
 $
 $8,995
Weighted-average interest rate4.95% 6.39% 6.39% 8.17% 8.34% %  
Securitization notes             
Principal amounts$5,218
 $4,084
 $2,321
 $1,114
 $348
 $
 $13,175
Weighted-average interest rate1.91% 2.12% 2.40% 2.71% 2.88% %  
Senior notes             
Principal amounts$
 $
 $1,000
 $1,000
 $1,250
 $750
 $4,106
Weighted-average interest rate% % 2.75% 4.75% 4.65% 4.25%  

The following table summarizes GM Financial's interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, excluding derivatives, by year of expected maturity and the fair value of those assets and liabilities at December 31, 2012 (dollars in millions):
Years Ended and Ending December 31, December 31, 2012
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Fair Value2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Fair Value
Assets                          
Consumer finance receivables                          
Principal amounts$4,108
 $2,860
 $1,895
 $1,209
 $673
 $315
 $10,759
$9,576
 $6,642
 $4,162
 $2,050
 $820
 $290
 $22,652
Weighted-average annual percentage rate14.54% 14.39% 14.25% 14.10% 13.95% 13.84%  10.76% 10.97% 11.17% 11.73% 12.28% 12.80%  
Commercial finance receivables                          
Principal amounts$507
 $6
 $3
 $3
 $35
 $6
 $554
$5,731
 $22
 $25
 $94
 $117
 $6
 $6,016
Weighted-average annual percentage rate3.78% 3.80% 3.76% 3.78% 3.47% 4.53%  6.82% 4.73% 4.59% 4.50% 7.40% 5.69%  
                          
Liabilities                          
Secured Debt:             
Credit facilities                          
Principal amounts$354
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $354
$6,297
 $1,699
 $796
 $224
 $19
 $
 $8,995
Weighted-average interest rate0.64% % % % % %  4.95% 6.39% 6.39% 8.17% 8.34% %  
Securitization notes                          
Principal amounts$3,406
 $2,324
 $1,772
 $1,073
 $438
 $
 $9,171
$5,218
 $4,084
 $2,321
 $1,114
 $348
 $
 $13,175
Weighted-average interest rate2.33% 2.70% 3.03% 3.05% 2.99% %  1.91% 2.12% 2.40% 2.71% 2.88% %  
Unsecured Debt:             
Senior notes                          
Principal amounts$
 $
 $
 $
 $1,000
 $500
 $1,620
$
 $
 $1,000
 $1,000
 $1,250
 $750
 $4,106
Weighted-average interest rate% % % % 4.75% 6.75%  % % 2.75% 4.75% 4.65% 4.25%  
Credit facilities and other unsecured debt             
Principal amounts$2,108
 $706
 $90
 $
 $76
 $
 $2,972
Weighted-average interest rate9.68% 8.82% 6.48% % 5.64% %  

GM Financial estimates the realization of finance receivables in future periods using discount rate, prepayment and credit loss assumptions similar to its historical experience. Credit facilities and securitization notes payable amounts have been classified based on expected payoff. Senior notes and convertible senior notes principal amounts have been classified based on maturity.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

GM Financial is exposed to foreign currency risk due to the translation and remeasurement of the results of certain international operations, primarily those acquired from Ally Financial in 2013, into U.S. Dollars as part of the consolidation process. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can therefore create volatility in the results of operations and may adversely affect GM Financial's financial condition.

GM Financial's policy is to finance receivables and lease assets with debt in the same currency. When a different currency is used GM Financial typically uses foreign currency swaps to convert substantially all of its foreign currency debt obligations to the local currency of the receivables and lease assets to minimize any impact to earnings.

GM Financial had foreign currency swaps in asset positions with notional amounts of $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion and in liability positions with notional amounts of $1.1 billion and $2.1 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013. The fair value of these derivative financial instruments was insignificant.

The following table summarizes the amounts of GM Financial's foreign currency translation and transaction and remeasurement losses (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss$(430) $11
Gains (losses) resulting from foreign currency transactions and remeasurements recorded in earnings$(170) $151
Gains (losses) resulting from foreign exchange swaps recorded in earnings163
 (149)
Net gains (losses) resulting from foreign currency exchange recorded in earnings$(7) $2
*  *  *  *  *  *  *

61
52



Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
General Motors Company, its Directors, and Stockholders:
 
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of General Motors Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
 
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20132014 of the Company and our report dated February 6, 20144, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph related to the Company's adoption of a revised accounting standard related to comprehensive income.

statements.



/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 6, 20144, 2015

62
53



Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

General Motors Company, its Directors, and Stockholders:

We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of General Motors Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related Consolidated Statements of Income, Comprehensive Income, Cash Flows and Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of General Motors Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted amendments in Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-02 to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, effective January 1, 2013.

As discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted amendments in ASU 2010-28 to ASC Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, effective January 1, 2011.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 6, 20144, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.




/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 6, 20144, 2015

63
54



Table of Contents

GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Net sales and revenue          
Automotive$152,092
 $150,295
 $148,866
$151,092
 $152,092
 $150,295
GM Financial3,335
 1,961
 1,410
4,837
 3,335
 1,961
Total155,427
 152,256
 150,276
155,929
 155,427
 152,256
Costs and expenses          
Automotive cost of sales134,925
 140,236
 130,386
Automotive cost of sales (Note 13)138,082
 134,925
 140,236
GM Financial operating and other expenses2,448
 1,207
 785
4,039
 2,448
 1,207
Automotive selling, general and administrative expense12,382
 14,031
 12,163
12,158
 12,382
 14,031
Goodwill impairment charges (Note 10)541
 27,145
 1,286
120
 541
 27,145
Total costs and expenses150,296
 182,619
 144,620
154,399
 150,296
 182,619
Operating income (loss)5,131
 (30,363) 5,656
1,530
 5,131
 (30,363)
Automotive interest expense334
 489
 540
403
 334
 489
Interest income and other non-operating income, net (Note 20)1,063
 845
 851
823
 1,063
 845
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt (Note 14)(212) (250) 18
202
 (212) (250)
Equity income and gain on investments (Note 8)1,810
 1,562
 3,192
Equity income (Note 8)2,094
 1,810
 1,562
Income (loss) before income taxes7,458
 (28,695) 9,177
4,246
 7,458
 (28,695)
Income tax expense (benefit) (Note 18)2,127
 (34,831) (110)228
 2,127
 (34,831)
Net income5,331
 6,136
 9,287
4,018
 5,331
 6,136
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests15
 52
 (97)(69) 15
 52
Net income attributable to stockholders$5,346
 $6,188
 $9,190
$3,949
 $5,346
 $6,188
          
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,770
 $4,859
 $7,585
$2,804
 $3,770
 $4,859
          
Earnings per share (Note 22)          
Basic          
Basic earnings per common share$2.71
 $3.10
 $4.94
$1.75
 $2.71
 $3.10
Weighted-average common shares outstanding1,393
 1,566
 1,536
1,605
 1,393
 1,566
Diluted          
Diluted earnings per common share$2.38
 $2.92
 $4.58
$1.65
 $2.38
 $2.92
Weighted-average common shares outstanding1,676
 1,675
 1,668
1,687
 1,676
 1,675

Reference should be made to the notes to consolidated financial statements.


64
55



Table of Contents


GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Net income$5,331
 $6,136
 $9,287
$4,018
 $5,331
 $6,136
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (Note 21)          
Foreign currency translation adjustments(733) (103) (183)(473) (733) (103)
Cash flow hedging gains (losses), net
 (2) 25
Cash flow hedging losses, net
 
 (2)
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities, net(39) 45
 1
(5) (39) 45
Defined benefit plans, net5,693
 (2,120) (6,958)(4,505) 5,693
 (2,120)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax4,921
 (2,180) (7,115)(4,983) 4,921
 (2,180)
Comprehensive income10,252
 3,956
 2,172
Comprehensive income (loss)(965) 10,252
 3,956
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests33
 41
 (87)(46) 33
 41
Comprehensive income attributable to stockholders$10,285
 $3,997
 $2,085
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to stockholders$(1,011) $10,285
 $3,997

Reference should be made to the notes to consolidated financial statements.






































65
56



Table of Contents


GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
ASSETS      
Current Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents$20,021
 $18,422
$18,954
 $20,021
Marketable securities (Note 5)8,972
 8,988
Restricted cash and marketable securities (Note 5)1,247
 686
Accounts and notes receivable (net of allowance of $344 and $311; Note 2)8,535
 10,395
GM Financial receivables, net (Note 4)(including SPE receivables of $10,001 and $3,444; Note 12)14,278
 4,044
Marketable securities (Note 4)9,222
 8,972
Restricted cash and marketable securities (Note 4)1,338
 1,247
Accounts and notes receivable (net of allowance of $340 and $344; Note 2)9,078
 8,535
GM Financial receivables, net (Note 5)($11,134 and $10,001 at VIEs; Note 12)16,528
 14,278
Inventories (Note 6)14,039
 14,714
13,642
 14,039
Equipment on operating leases, net (Note 7)2,398
 1,782
3,564
 2,398
Deferred income taxes (Note 18)10,349
 9,429
9,760
 10,349
Other current assets1,662
 1,536
1,584
 1,662
Total current assets81,501
 69,996
83,670
 81,501
Non-current Assets      
Restricted cash and marketable securities (Note 5)829
 682
GM Financial receivables, net (Note 4)(including SPE receivables of $11,216 and $6,458; Note 12)14,354
 6,954
Restricted cash and marketable securities (Note 4)935
 829
GM Financial receivables, net (Note 5)($11,583 and $11,216 at VIEs; Note 12)16,006
 14,354
Equity in net assets of nonconsolidated affiliates (Note 8)8,094
 6,883
8,350
 8,094
Property, net (Note 9)25,867
 24,196
27,743
 25,867
Goodwill (Note 10)1,560
 1,973
1,427
 1,560
Intangible assets, net (Note 11)5,668
 6,809
4,983
 5,668
GM Financial equipment on operating leases, net (Note 7)(including SPE assets of $1,803 and $540; Note 12)3,383
 1,649
GM Financial equipment on operating leases, net (Note 7)($4,595 and $1,803 at VIEs; Note 12)7,060
 3,383
Deferred income taxes (Note 18)22,736
 27,922
25,414
 22,736
Other assets2,352
 2,358
2,089
 2,352
Total non-current assets84,843
 79,426
94,007
 84,843
Total Assets$166,344
 $149,422
$177,677
 $166,344
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY      
Current Liabilities      
Accounts payable (principally trade)$23,621
 $25,166
$22,529
 $23,621
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt (Note 14)      
Automotive (including certain debt at VIEs of $219 and $228; Note 12)564
 1,748
GM Financial (including certain debt at VIEs of $10,088 and $3,770; Note 12)13,594
 3,770
Automotive500
 564
GM Financial ($10,502 and $10,088 at VIEs; Note 12)14,488
 13,594
Accrued liabilities (Note 13)24,633
 23,308
28,184
 24,633
Total current liabilities62,412
 53,992
65,701
 62,412
Non-current Liabilities      
Long-term debt (Note 14)      
Automotive (including certain debt at VIEs of $23 and $122; Note 12)6,573
 3,424
GM Financial (including certain debt at VIEs of $9,330 and $5,608; Note 12)15,452
 7,108
Automotive8,910
 6,573
GM Financial ($12,292 and $9,330 at VIEs; Note 12)22,943
 15,452
Postretirement benefits other than pensions (Note 15)5,897
 7,309
6,229
 5,897
Pensions (Note 15)19,483
 27,420
23,788
 19,483
Other liabilities and deferred income taxes (Note 13)13,353
 13,169
Other liabilities (Note 13)14,082
 13,353
Total non-current liabilities60,758
 58,430
75,952
 60,758
Total Liabilities123,170
 112,422
141,653
 123,170
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

 



 

Equity (Note 21)      
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value   
Series A3,109
 5,536
Series B
 4,855
Series A preferred stock, $0.01 par value
 3,109
Common stock, $0.01 par value15
 14
16
 15
Additional paid-in capital28,780
 23,834
28,937
 28,780
Retained earnings13,816
 10,057
14,577
 13,816
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(3,113) (8,052)(8,073) (3,113)
Total stockholders’ equity42,607
 36,244
35,457
 42,607
Noncontrolling interests567
 756
567
 567
Total Equity43,174
 37,000
36,024
 43,174
Total Liabilities and Equity$166,344
 $149,422
$177,677
 $166,344

Reference should be made to the notes to consolidated financial statements.

66
57



Table of Contents


GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Cash flows from operating activities          
Net income$5,331
 $6,136
 $9,287
$4,018
 $5,331
 $6,136
Depreciation, impairment charges and amortization expense8,041
 38,762
 7,427
Depreciation, amortization and impairment charges7,238
 8,041
 38,762
Foreign currency remeasurement and transaction losses350
 117
 55
437
 350
 117
Amortization of discount and issuance costs on debt issues114
 188
 160
181
 114
 188
Undistributed earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates and gain on investments(92) (179) (1,947)
Undistributed earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates and gains on investments(301) (92) (179)
Pension contributions and OPEB payments(1,458) (3,759) (2,269)(1,315) (1,458) (3,759)
Pension and OPEB (income) expense, net638
 3,232
 (755)
Pension and OPEB expense, net439
 638
 3,232
(Gains) losses on extinguishment of debt212
 250
 (18)(202) 212
 250
Provision (benefit) for deferred taxes1,561
 (35,561) (318)(574) 1,561
 (35,561)
Change in other operating assets and liabilities (Note 26)(1,326) 630
 (4,122)244
 (1,326) 630
Other operating activities(741) 789
 666
(107) (741) 789
Net cash provided by operating activities12,630
 10,605
 8,166
10,058
 12,630
 10,605
Cash flows from investing activities          
Expenditures for property(7,565) (8,068) (6,249)(7,091) (7,565) (8,068)
Available-for-sale marketable securities, acquisitions(6,754) (4,650) (20,535)(7,636) (6,754) (4,650)
Trading marketable securities, acquisitions(3,214) (6,234) (6,571)(1,518) (3,214) (6,234)
Available-for-sale marketable securities, liquidations3,566
 10,519
 15,825
6,874
 3,566
 10,519
Trading marketable securities, liquidations6,538
 7,267
 660
1,881
 6,538
 7,267
Acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired(2,623) (44) (53)(53) (2,623) (44)
Proceeds from sale of business units/investments, net of cash disposed896
 18
 4,821

 896
 18
Increase in restricted cash and marketable securities(984) (661) (728)(839) (984) (661)
Decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities1,107
 1,526
 2,067
515
 1,107
 1,526
Purchases and funding of finance receivables(30,727) (6,789) (5,012)
Purchase of finance receivables(14,744) (10,838) (6,122)
Principal collections and recoveries on finance receivables27,444
 4,674
 3,719
10,860
 7,555
 4,007
Purchases of leased vehicles, net(2,254) (1,050) (837)(4,776) (2,254) (1,050)
Proceeds from termination of leased vehicles217
 59
 47
533
 217
 59
Other investing activities(9) (72) 106
296
 (9) (72)
Net cash used in investing activities(14,362) (3,505) (12,740)(15,698) (14,362) (3,505)
Cash flows from financing activities          
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt156
 (247) 131
391
 156
 (247)
Proceeds from issuance of debt (original maturities greater than three months)28,041
 9,036
 9,034
31,373
 28,041
 9,036
Payments on debt (original maturities greater than three months)(20,191) (7,377) (8,468)(19,524) (20,191) (7,377)
Payments to purchase stock(2,438) (5,098) 
(3,277) (2,438) (5,098)
Dividends paid (including charge related to purchase of Series A Preferred Stock)(1,687) (939) (916)
Dividends paid (including charge related to redemption and purchase of Series A Preferred Stock)(3,165) (1,687) (939)
Other financing activities(150) (116) (139)(123) (150) (116)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities3,731
 (4,741) (358)5,675
 3,731
 (4,741)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(400) (8) (253)(1,102) (400) (8)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents1,599
 2,351
 (5,185)(1,067) 1,599
 2,351
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period18,422
 16,071
 21,256
20,021
 18,422
 16,071
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$20,021
 $18,422
 $16,071
$18,954
 $20,021
 $18,422
Significant Non-cash Activity          
Investing Cash Flows          
Non-cash property additions$3,224
 $3,879
 $3,689
$3,313
 $3,224
 $3,879
Financing Cash Flows          
Contribution of common stock to U.S. hourly and salaried pension plans (Note 15)

 

 $1,864
Notes issued to settle CAW hourly retiree healthcare plan (Note 15)

 

 $1,122
Mandatory conversion of Series B Preferred Stock into common stock (Note 21)$4,854
 

 

  $4,854
  

Reference should be made to the notes to consolidated financial statements.


67
58



Table of Contents


GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In millions)
 
Series A Preferred Stock Series B Preferred Stock Common Stockholders’ Noncontrolling Interests Total EquitySeries A Preferred Stock Series B Preferred Stock Common Stockholders’ Noncontrolling Interests Total Equity
Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
Balance December 31, 2010$5,536
 $4,855
 $15
 $24,257
 $266
 $1,251
 $979
 $37,159
Effect of adoption of amendments in ASU 2010-28 regarding goodwill impairment (Note 10)
 
 
 
 (1,466) 
 
 (1,466)
Balance January 1, 2012$5,536
 $4,855
 $16
 $26,391
 $7,183
 $(5,861) $871
 $38,991
Net income
 
 
 
 9,190
 
 97
 9,287

 
 
 
 6,188
 
 (52) 6,136
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 (7,105) (10) (7,115)
 
 
 
 
 (2,191) 11
 (2,180)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest shares
 
 
 41
 
 (7) (134) (100)
Exercise of common stock warrants
 
 
 11
 
 
 
 11
Stock based compensation
 
 
 219
 
 
 
 219
Pension plan stock contribution (Note 15)
 
 1
 1,863
 
 
 
 1,864
Cash dividends on Series A Preferred Stock and cumulative dividends on Series B Preferred Stock
 
 
 
 (859) 
 
 (859)
Dividends declared or paid to noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 (54) (54)
Other
 
 
 
 52
 
 (7) 45
Balance December 31, 20115,536
 4,855
 16
 26,391
 7,183
 (5,861) 871
 38,991
Net income
 
 
 
 6,188
 
 (52) 6,136
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 (2,191) 11
 (2,180)
Purchase and retirement of common stock
 
 (2) (2,652) (2,455) 
 
 (5,109)
 
 (2) (2,652) (2,455) 
 
 (5,109)
Exercise of common stock warrants
 
 
 5
 
 
 
 5

 
 
 5
 
 
 
 5
Stock based compensation
 
 
 89
 
 
 
 89

 
 
 89
 
 
 
 89
Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to common stock
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 1
Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock into common stock
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 1
Cash dividends on Series A Preferred Stock and cumulative dividends on Series B Preferred Stock
 
 
 
 (859) 
 
 (859)
 
 
 
 (859) 
 
 (859)
Dividends declared or paid to noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 (80) (80)
 
 
 
 
 
 (80) (80)
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 6
 6

 
 
 
 
 
 6
 6
Balance December 31, 20125,536
 4,855
 14
 23,834
 10,057
 (8,052) 756
 37,000
5,536
 4,855
 14
 23,834
 10,057
 (8,052) 756
 37,000
Net income
 
 
 
 5,346
 
 (15) 5,331

 
 
 
 5,346
 
 (15) 5,331
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 4,939
 (18) 4,921
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 4,939
 (18) 4,921
Purchase and cancellation of Series A Preferred Stock(2,427) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,427)(2,427) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,427)
Exercise of common stock warrants
 
 
 3
 
 
 
 3

 
 
 3
 
 
 
 3
Stock based compensation
 
 
 75
 
 
 
 75

 
 
 75
 
 
 
 75
Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to common stock
 (4,855) 1
 4,854
 
 
 
 
Mandatory conversion of Series B Preferred Stock into common stock
 (4,855) 1
 4,854
 
 
 
 
Cash dividends paid on Series A Preferred Stock, charge related to purchase of Series A Preferred Stock and dividends on Series B Preferred Stock
 
 
 
 (1,587) 
 
 (1,587)
 
 
 
 (1,587) 
 
 (1,587)
Dividends declared or paid to noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 (82) (82)
 
 
 
 
 
 (82) (82)
Other
 
 
 14
 
 
 (74) (60)
 
 
 14
 
 
 (74) (60)
Balance December 31, 2013$3,109
 $
 $15
 $28,780
 $13,816
 $(3,113) $567
 $43,174
3,109
 $
 15
 28,780
 13,816
 (3,113) 567
 43,174
Net income
   
 
 3,949
 
 69
 4,018
Other comprehensive loss
   
 
 
 (4,960) (23) (4,983)
Redemption and cancellation of Series A Preferred Stock(3,109)   
 
 
 
 
 (3,109)
Purchase of common stock
   
 (85) (83) 
 
 (168)
Exercise of common stock warrants
   1
 38
 
 
 
 39
Stock based compensation
   
 206
 (17) 
 
 189
Cash dividends paid on Series A Preferred Stock and charge related to redemption of Series A Preferred Stock
   
 
 (1,160) 
 
 (1,160)
Cash dividends paid on common stock
   
 
 (1,928) 
 
 (1,928)
Dividends declared or paid to noncontrolling interests
   
 
 
 
 (73) (73)
Other
   
 (2) 
 
 27
 25
Balance December 31, 2014$
   $16
 $28,937
 $14,577
 $(8,073) $567
 $36,024

Reference should be made to the notes to consolidated financial statements.

68
59



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Note 1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

General Motors Company was formed in 2009 originallyincorporated as a Delaware limited liability company, Vehicle Acquisition Holdings LLC, and subsequently converted to a Delaware corporation NGMCO, Inc. This company, which on July 10, 2009 acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of General Motors Corporation through a Section 363 sale under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (363 Sale) and changed its name to General Motors Company, is sometimes referred to in these consolidated financial statements for the periods on or subsequent to July 10, 2009 as “we,” “our,” “us,” “ourselves,” the “Company,” “General Motors,” or “GM.” General Motors Corporation is sometimes referred to in these consolidated financial statements, for the periods on or before July 9, 2009, as “Old GM” as it is the predecessor entity solely for accounting and financial reporting purposes. Old GM was renamed Motors Liquidation Company (MLC), which was dissolved on December 15, 2011 and transferred its remaining assets and liabilities to the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust (GUC Trust).

2009. We design, build and sell cars, trucks and automobile parts worldwide. We also provide automotive financing services through General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (GM Financial).GM Financial. We analyze the results of our business through our fivethe following segments: GM North America (GMNA), GM Europe (GME), GM International Operations (GMIO), GM South America (GMSA)GMNA, GME, GMIO, GMSA and GM Financial. Nonsegment operations are classified as Corporate. Corporate includes certain centrally recorded income and costs, such as interest, income taxes and corporate expenditures and certain nonsegment specific revenues and expenses.

As discussed in Note 13 we announced recalls of approximately 42 million vehicles and recorded charges of approximately $2.9 billion in Automotive cost of sales relating to recall campaigns and courtesy transportation in the year ended December 31, 2014 and as discussed in Note 17 we announced the creation of a compensation program related to faulty ignition switches on certain vehicles and recorded a charge of $400 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements includeare prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to our accountscurrent year presentation. In the three months ended March 31, 2014 we changed our managerial and thosefinancial reporting structure to reclassify the results of our Russian subsidiaries previously reported in our GMIO segment to our GME segment. We have retrospectively revised the segment presentation for all periods presented. Refer to Note 25 for additional information on our segment reporting.

We consolidate entities that we control due to ownership of a majority voting interest and our consolidatedwe consolidate variable interest entities (VIEs) of whichwhen we have variable interests and are the primary beneficiary. We continually evaluate our involvement with VIEs to determine whether we have variable interests and are the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Whenwhen these criteria are met, we are required to consolidate the VIE.met. Our share of earnings or losses of nonconsolidated affiliates is included in our consolidated operating results using the equity method of accounting when we are able to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial decisions of the affiliate. We use the cost method of accounting if we are not able to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial decisions of the affiliate. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to our current year presentation.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of the Financial Statements

TheAccounting estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requiresstatements. These estimates require the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the reporting date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuerevenues and expenses in the periods presented. We believe that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, due to the inherent uncertainties in making estimates actual results could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to these balances in future periods.

Change in Accounting Estimate

We historically accrued estimated costs related to recall campaigns in GMNA when they are probable and reasonably estimable, which typically occurs once it is determined a specific recall campaign is needed and announced. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, following the significant increase in the number of vehicles subject to recall in GMNA, the results of our ongoing comprehensive safety review, additional engineering analysis, the creation of a new Global Product Integrity organization, the appointment of a new Global Vice President of Vehicle Safety responsible for the safety development of our vehicle systems and our overall commitment to customer satisfaction, we accumulated sufficient historical data in GMNA to support the use of an actuarial-based estimation technique for recall campaigns. As such we now accrue at the time of vehicle sale in GMNA the costs for recall campaigns. Based on expanded historical data, we recorded a catch-up adjustment of $874 million in Automotive cost of sales in the three months ended June 30, 2014 to adjust the estimate for recall costs for previously sold vehicles. In other geographical regions the historical claims data did not support the application of an actuarial-based model; therefore, recall campaigns are accrued when probable and reasonably estimable, which typically occurs once it is determined a specific recall campaign is needed and announced.

GM Financial

The amounts presented for GM Financial have been adjusted to include the effect of our tax attributes on GM Financial's deferred tax positions and provision for income taxes since the date of acquisition, which are not applicable to GM Financial on a stand-alonestand-

60



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



alone basis, and to eliminate the effect of transactions between GM Financial and the other members of the consolidated group. Accordingly, the amounts presented will differ from those presented by GM Financial on a stand-alone basis.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting policies which follow are utilized by our automotive and automotive financing operations, unless otherwise indicated.

Revenue Recognition

Automotive


69



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Automotive net sales and revenue are primarily composed of revenue generated from the sale of vehicles. Vehicle sales are recorded when title and all risks and rewards of ownership have passed to our customers. For the majority of our automotive sales this occurs when a vehicle is released to the carrier responsible for transporting to a dealer and when collectability is reasonably assured. Vehicle sales are recorded when the vehicle is delivered to the dealer in most remaining cases. Provisions for recurring or announced dealer and customer sales and leasing incentives, consisting of allowances and rebates, are recorded as reductions to Automotive net sales and revenue at the time of vehicle sales. All other incentives, allowances and rebates related to vehicles previously sold are recorded as reductions to Automotive net sales and revenue when announced.

Vehicle sales to daily rental car companies with guaranteed repurchase obligations are accounted for as operating leases. Estimated lease revenue is recorded ratably over the estimated term of the lease based on the difference between net sales proceeds and the guaranteed repurchase amount. The difference between the cost of the vehicle and estimated residual value is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated term of the lease.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial

Finance charge income earned on receivables is recognized using the effective interest method for consumer financing receivables and accrual method for commercial financing receivables. Fees and commissions (including incentive payments) received and direct costs of originating loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the related finance receivables using the effective interest method and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets when the related finance receivables are sold, charged off or paid in full. Accrual of finance charge income on consumer finance receivables is generally suspended on accounts that are more than 60 days delinquent, accounts in bankruptcy and accounts in repossession. Payments received on nonaccrual loans are first applied to any fees due, then to any interest due and then any remaining amounts are recorded to principal. Interest accrual generally resumes once an account has received payments bringing the delinquency to less than 60 days past due. Accrual of finance charge income on commercial finance receivables is generally suspended on accounts that are more than 90 days delinquent, upon receipt of a bankruptcy notice from a borrower, or where reasonable doubt about the full collectability of contractually agreed upon principal and interest exist. Payments received on nonaccrual loans are first applied to principal. Interest accrual resumes once an account has received payments bringing the account fully current and collection of contractual principal and interest is reasonably assured (including amounts previously charged-off) or, for troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), when repayment is reasonably assured based on the modified terms of the loan.

Income from operating lease assets, which includes lease origination fees, net of lease origination costs and incentives, is recorded as operating lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement.

Advertising and Promotion Expenditures

Advertising and promotion expenditures, which are expensed as incurred in Automotive selling, general and administrative expense, were $5.2 billion, $5.5 billion $5.4 billion and $5.2$5.4 billion in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.2012.

Research and Development Expenditures

Research and development expenditures, which are expensed as incurred in Automotive cost of sales, were $7.4 billion, $7.2 billion $7.4 billion and $8.1$7.4 billion in the years ended December, 31 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.2012.

Cash Equivalents

61



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



Cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly-liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We record an allowance for doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of recoverability of receivables. Charges related to the allowance for doubtful accounts are recorded in Automotive selling, general and administrative expense. The following table summarizes activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable related to our automotive operations (dollars in millions):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Balance at beginning of period$311
 $331
 $252
$344
 $311
 $331
Amounts charged (credited) to costs and expenses61
 (10) 159
50
 61
 (10)
Deductions(24) (46) (83)(8) (24) (46)
Other(4) 36
 3
Effect of foreign currency and other(46) (4) 36
Balance at end of period$344
 $311
 $331
$340
 $344
 $311


70



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Fair Value Measurements

A three-level valuation hierarchy, based upon observable and unobservable inputs, is used for fair value measurements. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions based on the best evidence available. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets;markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active;active and model-derived valuations whose significant inputs are observable; and
Level 3 - Instruments whose significant inputs are unobservable.

Financial instruments are transferred in and/or out of Level 1, 2 or 3 at the beginning of the accounting period in which there is a change in the valuation inputs.

Marketable Securities

We classify marketable securities as available-for-sale or trading. Various factors, including turnover of holdings and investment guidelines, are considered in determining the classification of securities. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded net of related income taxes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss until realized. Trading securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in Interest income and other non-operating income, net. We determine realized gains and losses for all securities using the specific identification method.

We measure the fair value of our marketable securities using a market approach where identical or comparable prices are available and an income approach in other cases. Securities are classified in Level 1 when quoted prices in an active market for identical securities are available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values of securities are determined using prices from a pricing service, pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flow models and are generally classified in Level 2.models. These prices represent non-binding quotes. U.S. government and agency securities, sovereign debt and corporate debt securities are classified in Level 2. Our pricing service utilizes industry-standard pricing models that consider various inputs, including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads and benchmark securities as well as other relevant economic measures.inputs. We conduct an annual review of our pricing service. This review includes discussion and analysis of the inputs used by the pricing service to provide prices for the types of securities we hold. These inputs include prices for comparable securities, bid/ask quotes, interest rate yields and prepayment speeds. Based on our review we believe the prices received from our pricing service are a reliable representation of exit prices. Securities are classified in Level 3 in certain cases where there are unobservable inputs to the valuation in the marketplace. Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable inputs, observable components that are validated to external sources.

An evaluation is made quarterly to determine if unrealized losses related to non-trading investments in securities are other-than-temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss on a marketable security is other-than-temporary include: (1) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been below cost; (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; and (3) the intent to sell or likelihood to be forced to sell the security before any anticipated recovery.

Finance Receivables

62



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



As the result of our October 2010 acquisition of GM Financial and GM Financial's acquisition of the Ally Financial Inc. (Ally Financial) international operations, finance receivables are reported in two portfolios: pre-acquisition and post-acquisition portfolios. The pre-acquisition finance receivables portfolio consists of finance receivables that were considered to have had deterioration in credit quality at the time they were acquired with the acquisitionacquisitions of GM Financial or the acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations. The pre-acquisition portfolio will decrease over time with the amortization of the acquired receivables. The post-acquisition finance receivables portfolio consists of finance receivables that were considered to have had no deterioration in credit quality at the time they were acquired with the acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations and finance receivables originated since the acquisitions of GM Financial and the Ally Financial international operations. The post-acquisition portfolio is expected to grow over time as GM Financial originates new receivables.


71



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Pre-Acquisition Consumer Finance Receivables
 
At the time of acquisitions the receivables were recorded at fair value. The pre-acquisition finance receivables were acquired at a discount, which contains two components: a non-accretable difference and an accretable yield. The accretable yield is recorded as finance charge income over the life of the acquired receivables.

Any deterioration in the performance of the pre-acquisition finance receivables from their expected performance will result in an incremental provision for loan losses. Improvements in the performance of the pre-acquisition finance receivables will result first in the reversal of any incremental related allowance for loan losses and then in a transfer of the excess from the non-accretable difference to accretable yield, which will be recorded as finance charge income over the remaining life of the receivables.

Post-Acquisition Consumer Finance Receivables and Allowance for Loan Losses

Post-acquisition finance receivables originated since the acquisitions of GM Financial and the Ally Financial international operations are carried at amortized cost, net of allowance for loan losses.

The component of the allowance for consumer finance receivables that areis collectively evaluated for impairment is based on a statistical calculation supplemented by management judgment. GM Financial uses a combination of forecasting models to determine the allowance for loan losses. Factors that are considered when estimating the allowance include loss confirmation period, historical delinquency migration to loss, probability of default and loss given default. The loss confirmation period is a key assumption within the models, which represents the average amount of time betweenfrom when a loss event first occurs to when the receivable is charged-off.

Consumer finance receivables that become classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs)TDRs are separately assessed for impairment. A specific allowance is estimated based on the present value of the expected future cash flows of the receivable discounted at the loan's original effective interest rate.

Consumer finance receivables are generally charged off in the month in which the account becomes 120 days contractually delinquent if we have not yet recorded a repossession charge-off. A charge-off generally represents the difference between the estimated net sales proceeds and the amount of the contract, including accrued interest.

The finance receivables acquired with the Ally Financial international operations that were considered to have no deterioration in credit quality at the time of acquisition were recorded at fair value. The purchase discount will accrete to income over the life of the receivables, based on contractual cash flows, using the effective interest method. Provisions for loan losses are charged to operations in amounts equal to net credit losses for the period. Any subsequent deterioration in the performance of the acquired receivables will result in an incremental provision for loan losses.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Market, which represents selling price less cost to sell, considers general market and economic conditions, periodic reviews of current profitability of vehicles, product warranty costs and the effect of current and expected incentive offers at the balance sheet date. Market for off-lease and other vehicles is current auction sales proceeds less disposal and warranty costs. Productive material, work in process, supplies and service parts are reviewed to determine if inventory quantities are in excess of forecasted usage or if they have become obsolete.


63



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Equipment on Operating Leases, net

Equipment on operating leases, net is reported at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment, net of origination fees or costs and lease incentives. Estimated income from operating lease assets, which includes lease origination fees, net of lease origination costs, is recorded as operating lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement. Leased vehicles are depreciated on a straight-line basis to an estimated residual value over the term of the lease agreements.

We have significant investments in vehicles in operating lease portfolios, which are composed of vehicle leases to retail customers with lease terms of up to 60 months and vehicles leased to rental car companies with lease terms that average eight months or less. We are exposed to changes in the residual values of those assets. For impairment purposes the residual values represent estimates of the values of the vehicles leased at the end of the lease contracts and are determined based on forecasted auction proceeds when there is a reliable basis to make such a determination. Realization of the residual values is dependent on the future ability to market the vehicles under the prevailing market conditions. The adequacy of the estimate of the residual value is evaluated over the life of the lease and adjustments may be made to the extent the expected value of the vehicle at lease termination changes. Adjustments may be in the form of revisions to the depreciation rate or recognition of an impairment charge. Impairment is determined to exist

72



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


if the expected future cash flows, which include estimated residual values, are lower than the carrying amount of the vehicles leased. If the carrying amount is considered impaired an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. Fair value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows, including estimated residual values.

In our Automotiveautomotive operations when a leased vehicle is returned the asset is reclassified from Equipment on operating leases, net to Inventories at the lower of cost or estimated selling price, less cost to sell. Upon disposition proceeds are recorded in Automotive net sales and revenue and costs are recorded in Automotive cost of sales. In our Automotive Financeautomotive finance operations when a leased vehicle is returned or repossessed the asset is recorded in Other assets at the lower of cost or estimated selling price, less costs to sell. Upon disposition a gain or loss is recorded for any difference between the net book value of the leased asset and the proceeds from the disposition of the asset.

ImpairmentDepreciation expense and impairment charges related to Equipment on operating leases, net are recorded in Automotive cost of sales or GM Financial operating and other expenses.

Valuation of Cost and Equity Method Investments

When events and circumstances warrant, investments accounted for under the cost or equity method of accounting are evaluated for impairment. An impairment charge is recorded whenever a decline in value of an investment below its carrying amount is determined to be other-than-temporary. In determining if a decline is other-than-temporary, factors such as the length of time and extent to which the fair value of the investment has been less than the carrying amount of the investment, the near-term and longer-term operating and financial prospects of the affiliate and the intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery are considered. Impairment charges related to equity method investments are recorded in Equity income and gain on investments.income. Impairment charges related to cost method investments are recorded in Interest income and other non-operating income, net.

Property, net

Property, plant and equipment, including internal use software, is recorded at cost. Major improvements that extend the useful life or add functionality of property are capitalized. The gross amount of assets under capital leases is included in property, plant and equipment. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. We depreciate all depreciable property using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the period of lease or the life of the asset, whichever is shorter. The amortization of the assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense. Upon retirement or disposition of property, plant and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recorded in earnings. Impairment charges related to property are recorded in Automotive cost of sales, Automotive selling, general and administrative expense or GM Financial operating and other expenses.

Special Tools

Special tools represent product-specific powertrain and non-powertrain related tools, dies, molds and other items used in the vehicle manufacturing process. Expenditures for special tools are recorded at cost and are capitalized. We amortize all non-powertrain special tools over their estimated useful lives using an accelerated amortization method. We amortize powertrain special tools over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Impairment charges related to special tools are recorded in Automotive cost of sales.


64



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Goodwill

Goodwill arises from the application of fresh-start reporting and acquisitions accounted for as business combinations. Goodwill is tested for impairment for all reporting units on an annual basis during the fourth quarter,as of October 1, or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would warrant such a review. When the fair value of a reporting unit falls below its carrying amount an impairment charge is recorded for the amount, if any, by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Fair values of reporting units are established using a discounted cash flow method. Where available and as appropriate, comparative market multiples and the quoted market price for our common stock are used to corroborate the results of the discounted cash flow method. Our reporting units are GMNA and GME and various reporting units within the GMIO, GMSA and GM Financial segments. Due toWhen performing our goodwill impairment testing, the integrated nature of our manufacturing operations and the sharing of assets, other resources and vehicle platforms among brands within GMNA and GME and because financial information by brand or country is not discrete below the operating segment level, GMNA and GME do not contain reporting units below the operating segment level. GMIO, GMSA and GM Financial are

73



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


less integrated given the lack of regional trade pacts and other unique geographical differences and thus contain separate reporting units below the operating segment level. Goodwill would be reassigned on a relative-fair-value basis to a portion of a reporting unit to be disposed of or upon the reorganization of the composition of one or morefair values of our reporting units unlessare determined based on valuation techniques using the best available information, primarily discounted cash flow projections. We make significant assumptions and estimates, which utilize Level 3 measures, about the extent and timing of future cash flows, growth rates, market share and discount rates that represent unobservable inputs into our valuation methodologies. Our fair value estimates for annual and event-driven impairment tests assume the achievement of the future financial results contemplated in our forecasted cash flows and there can be no assurance that we will realize that value. The valuation methodologies utilized to perform our goodwill impairment testing were consistent with those used in our application of fresh-start reporting unit was never integrated.on July 10, 2009 and in any subsequent annual or event-driven goodwill impairment tests and utilized Level 3 measures. Because the fair value of goodwill can be measured only as a residual amount and cannot be determined directly we calculate the implied goodwill for those reporting units failing Step 1 in the same manner that goodwill is recognized in a business combination pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805.

Intangible Assets, net

Intangible assets, excluding Goodwill,goodwill, primarily include brand names, (including defensive intangibles associated with discontinued brands), technology and intellectual property, customer relationships and dealer networks.

Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line or an accelerated method of amortization over their estimated useful lives. An accelerated amortization method reflecting the pattern in which the asset will be consumed is utilized if that pattern can be reliably determined. We consider the period of expected cash flows and underlying data used to measure the fair value of the intangible assets when selecting a useful life. Impairment charges related to intangible assets are recorded in Automotive selling, general and administrative expense or Automotive cost of sales.

Amortization of developed technology and intellectual property is recorded in Automotive cost of sales. Amortization of brand names, customer relationships and our dealer networks is recorded in Automotive selling, general and administrative expense or GM Financial operating and other expenses.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

The carrying amount of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets to be held and used in the business are evaluated for impairment when events and circumstances warrant. If the carrying amount of a long-lived asset group is considered impaired, a loss is recorded based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds fair value. Product-specific long-lived asset groups are tested for impairment at the platform or vehicle line level and consider their geographical location. Non-product specific long-lived assets are tested for impairment on a reporting unit basis in GMNA and GME and tested at or within our various reporting units within our GMIO, GMSA and GM Financial segments. Fair value is determined using either the market or sales comparison approach, cost approach or anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Long-lived assets to be disposed of other than by sale are considered held for use until disposition. Product-specific assets may become impaired as a result of declines in profitability due to changes in volume, pricing or costs.

Pension and Other PostretirementOPEB Plans

Attribution, Methods and Assumptions

The cost of benefits provided by defined benefit pension plans is recorded in the period employees provide service. The cost of pension plan amendments that provide for benefits already earned by plan participants is amortized over the expected period of benefit which may be: (1) the duration of the applicable collective bargaining agreement specific to the plan; (2) expected future working lifetime; or (3) the life expectancy of the plan participants.

The cost of medical, dental, legal service and life insurance benefits provided through postretirement benefit plans is recorded in the period employees provide service. The cost of postretirement plan amendments that provide for benefits already earned by plan participants is amortized over the expected period of benefit which may bebe: (1) the average period to full eligibility oreligibility; (2) the average life expectancy of the plan participants,participants; or (3) the period to the plan's termination date for a plan which provides legal services.


65



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


An expected return on plan asset methodology is utilized to calculate future pension expense for certain significant funded benefit plans. A market-related value of plan assets methodology is also utilized that averages gains and losses on the plan assets over a period of years to determine future pension expense. The methodology recognizes 60% of the difference between the fair value of assets and the expected calculated value in the first year and 10% of that difference over each of the next four years.

The discount rate assumption is established for each of the retirement-related benefit plans at their respective measurement dates. In the U.S. we use a cash flow matching approach that uses projected cash flows matched to spot rates along a high quality corporate yield curve to determine the present value of cash flows to calculate a single equivalent discount rate.


74



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


The benefit obligation for pension plans in Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany represents 92% of the non-U.S. pension benefit obligation at December 31, 20132014. The discount rates for plans in Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany are determined using a cash flow matching approach similar to the U.S. approach.

In countries other thanPlan Asset Valuation

Due to the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom and those locatedlack of timely available market information for certain investments in the Eurozone discount rates are established depending onasset classes described below as well as the local financial markets, using a high quality yield curve based on local bonds, a yield curve adjusted to reflect local conditions or local actuarial standards.

Plan Asset Valuationinherent uncertainty of valuation, reported fair values may differ from fair values that would have been used had timely available market information been available.

Cash Equivalents and Other Short-Term Investments

Money market funds and other similar short-term investment funds are valued using the net asset value per share (NAV). Prices for short-term debt securities are received from independent pricing services or from dealers who make markets in such securities. Independent pricing services utilize matrix pricing which considers readily available inputs such as the yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type as well as dealer supplied prices. Money market mutual funds which provide investors with the ability to redeem their interests on a daily basis and for which NAVs are publicly available are classified in Level 1. Other cash equivalents and short-term investments are classified in Level 2.

Common and Preferred Stock

Common and preferred stock for which market prices are readily available at the measurement date are valued at the last reported sale price or official closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they are actively traded and are classified in Level 1. Such equity securities for which the market is not considered to be active are valued via the use of observable inputs, which may include, among others, the use of adjusted market prices last available, bids or last available sales prices and/or other observable inputs and are classified in Level 2. Common and preferred stock classified in Level 3 are those privately issued securities or other issues that are valued via the use of valuation models using significant unobservable inputs that generally consider among others, aged (stale) pricing, earnings multiples, discounted cash flows and/or other qualitative and quantitative factors.

Fixed Income Securities

Fixed income securities are valued based on quotations received from independent pricing services or from dealers who make markets in such securities. Debt securities which are priced via the use of pricing services that utilize matrix pricing which considers readily observable inputs such as the yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type as well as dealer supplied prices, are classified in Level 2. Fixed income securities within this category that are typically priced by dealers and pricing services via the use of proprietary pricing models which incorporate significant unobservable inputs are classified in Level 3. These inputs primarily consist of yield and credit spread assumptions, discount rates, prepayment curves, default assumptions and recovery rates.

Investment Funds, Private Equity and Debt Investments and Real Estate Investments

Investments in exchange traded funds, real estate investment trusts and mutual funds, for which market quotations are generally readily available, are valued at the last reported sale price, official closing price or publicly available NAV (or its equivalent) on the primary market or exchange on which they are traded and are classified in Level 1. Investments in private investment funds (including hedge funds, private equity funds and real estate funds) are generally valued based on their respective NAV (or its equivalent), as a practical expedient to estimate fair value due to the absence of readily available market prices. Investments in

66



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


private investment funds, which may be fully redeemed at NAV in the near-term are generally classified in Level 2. Investments in funds, which may not be fully redeemed at NAV in the near-term, are generally classified in Level 3.

Direct investments in private equity, private debt and real estate securities are generally valued in good faith via the use of the market approach (earnings multiples from comparable companies) or the income approach (discounted cash flow techniques), and consider inputs such as revenue growth and gross margin assumptions, discount rates, discounts for lack of liquidity, market capitalization rates and the selection of comparable companies. As these valuations incorporate significant unobservable inputs they are classified in Level 3.


75



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Fair value estimates for private investment funds, private equity, private debt and real estate investments are provided by the respective investment sponsors or investment advisers and are subsequently reviewed and approved by management. In the event management concludes a reported NAV or fair value estimate (collectively, external valuation) does not reflect fair value or is not determined as of the financial reporting measurement date, we will consider whether and when deemed necessary to make an adjustment at the balance sheet date. In determining whether an adjustment to the external valuation is required, we will review material factors that could affect the valuation, such as changes to the composition or performance of the underlying investments or comparable investments, overall market conditions, expected sale prices for private investments which are probable of being sold in the short termshort-term and other economic factors that may possibly have a favorable or unfavorable effect on the reported external valuation.

Derivatives

Exchange traded derivatives, such as options and futures, for which market quotations are readily available, are valued at the last reported sale price or official closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they are traded and are classified in Level 1. Over-the-counter derivatives, including but not limited to swaps, swaptions and forwards, which are typically valued through independent pricing services with observable inputs are generally classified in Level 2. Swaps that are cleared by clearinghouses or exchanges are valued with the prices provided by those venues and are generally classified in Level 2. Derivatives classified in Level 3 are typically valued via the use of pricing models which incorporate significant unobservable inputs, but may also include derivatives which are valued with the use of significant observable inputs which are not subject to corroboration.inputs. The inputs part of the model based valuations may include extrapolated or model-derived assumptions such as volatilities, yield and credit spread assumptions.

Due to the lack of timely available market information for certain investments in the asset classes described above as well as the inherent uncertainty of valuation, reported fair values may differ from fair values that would have been used had timely available market information been available.

Job Security Programs and Extended Disability Benefits

We have job security programs to provide International Union, United Automobile, AerospaceUAW and Agriculture Implement WorkersUnifor (combined union of America (UAW) andthe Canadian Auto Workers union and the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union (CAW)of Canada) employees reduced wages and continued coverage under certain employee benefit programs depending on the employee's classification as well as the number of years of service that the employee has accrued. We also provide extended disability benefits for employees currently disabled and those in the active workforce who may become disabled in the form of income replacement, healthcare costs and life insurance premiums.

We recognize a liability for job security programs and extended disability benefits over the expected service period using measurement provisions similar to those used to measure our other postretirement benefits (OPEB)OPEB obligations based on our best estimate of the probable liability at the measurement date. We record actuarial gains and losses immediately in earnings.

Stock Incentive Plans

We measure and record compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based on the award's estimated fair value which is the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant or for restricted stock units (RSUs) granted prior to our public offering,RSUs and Performance Share Units (PSUs). For awards that do not have an accounting grant date established, the compensation cost is based on the fair value of our common stock asat the end of the date of the public offering.each reporting period. We record compensation cost for the awards on a straight-line basis over the entire vesting period, or for retirement eligible employees over the requisite service period. Salary stock awards granted are fully vested and nonforfeitable upon grant; therefore, compensation cost is recorded on the date of grant. The liability for stock incentive plan awards settled in cash is remeasured to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

Policy, Product Warranty and Recall Campaigns

The estimated costs related to policy and product warranties are accrued at the time products are sold and are charged to Automotive cost of sales. These estimates are established using historical information on the nature, frequency and average cost

67



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


of claims of each vehicle line or each model year of the vehicle line and assumptions about future activity and events. Revisions are made when necessary based on changes in these factors. Trends of claims are actively studied and actions are taken to improve vehicle quality and minimize claims. The estimated costs related to product recalls based on a formal campaign soliciting return of that productrecall campaigns are accrued at the time of vehicle sale in GMNA and when they are deemed to be probable and can be reasonably estimated.estimable in other geographical regions.


76



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Income Taxes

The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements using the statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recorded in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date under the law.

Deferred income tax assets are evaluated quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required or should be adjusted. We establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets based on a more likely than not standard. The ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods provided for in the tax law for each applicable tax jurisdiction. The assessment regarding whether a valuation allowance is required or should be adjusted also considers all available positive and negative evidence factors.

It is difficult to conclude a valuation allowance is not required when there is significant objective and verifiable negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years. We utilize a rolling three years of actual and current year results as the primary measure of cumulative losses in recent years.

Income tax expense (benefit) for the year is allocated between continuing operations and other categories of income such as Other comprehensive income (loss). In periods in which there is a pre-tax loss from continuing operations and pre-tax income in another income category, the tax benefit allocated to continuing operations is determined by taking into account the pre-tax income of other categories.

We record uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process whereby: (1) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position; and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. We record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions in Income tax expense (benefit).

Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation

The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries that use the local currency as their functional currency are translated to U.S. Dollars based on the current exchange rate prevailing at each balance sheet date and any resulting translation adjustments are included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries whose local currency is not their functional currency are remeasured from their local currency to their functional currency and then translated to U.S. Dollars. Revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. Dollars using the average exchange rates prevailing for each period presented.

Gains and losses arising from foreign currency transactions and the effects of remeasurements discussed in the preceding paragraph are recorded in Automotive cost of sales and GM Financial operating and other expenses unless related to Automotive debt, which are recorded in Interest income and other non-operating income, net. Foreign currency transaction and remeasurement losses were $437 million, $350 million $117 million and $55$117 million in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.

Recently Adopted Accounting Principles

On January 1, 2013 we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." This ASU does not change current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income (OCI) in financial statements; rather, it requires certain disclosures of the amount of reclassifications of items from OCI to net income by component. The related disclosures are presented in Note 21.2012.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In July 2013May 2014 the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2013-11, “PresentationAccounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09) which requires companies to recognize revenue when a customer obtains control rather than when companies have transferred substantially all risks and rewards of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss,good or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists” to eliminate diversity in practice.service. This ASU requires that companies net their unrecognized tax benefits against all same-jurisdiction net operating losses or tax credit carryforwards that would be used to settle the position with a tax authority. This new guidanceupdate is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods

77



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


beginning on or after December 15, 20132016 and interim periods therein. Thetherein and requires expanded disclosures. We are currently assessing the impact the adoption of this ASU 2014-09 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements because it aligns with our current presentation.statements.

Note 3. Acquisition of Businesses

Acquisition of Certain Ally Financial International Operations


68



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


In November 2012 GM Financial entered into a definitive agreement with Ally Financial to acquire 100% of the outstanding equity interests in the top level holding companies of its automotive finance and financial services operations in Europe and Latin America and a separate agreement to acquire Ally Financial’s non-controlling equity interest in GMAC-SAIC Automotive Finance Company Limited (GMAC-SAIC),SAIC-GMAC, which conducts automotive finance and other financial services in China.

On April 1,In the year ended December 31, 2013 GM Financial completed the acquisitionacquisitions of Ally Financial's European and Latin American automotive finance operations except for France, Portugal and Brazil; on June 1, 2013 it completed the acquisition of Ally Financial's automotive finance operations in France and Portugal; and on October 1, 2013 it completed the acquisition of Ally Financial's automotive finance operations in Brazil. Thean aggregate consideration for these acquisitions was $3.3 billion, subject to certain closing adjustments. Acquisition-related costs were insignificant. In addition GM Financial repaid loans of $1.4 billion that were assumed as part of the acquisitions.$3.3 billion. GM Financial recorded the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition dates. Certain amounts previously presented related to the acquisitions have been, and will continue to be, updated as a result of closing adjustments.

GM Financial's acquisition of Ally Financial's equity interest in GMAC-SAIC is subject to certain regulatory and other approvals and is expected to close in 2014. GM Financial expects to pay approximately $900 million to close this acquisition subject to certain closing adjustments.

The following table summarizes the aggregate consideration and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition dates, before eliminations for net intercompany receivables of approximately $300 million (dollars in millions):
Cash$607
Restricted cash906
Finance receivables15,144
Other assets, including identifiable intangible assets769
Secured and unsecured debt(12,833)
Other liabilities(1,483)
Identifiable net assets acquired3,110
Goodwill resulting from the acquisitions144
Aggregate consideration$3,254

The fair valuewhich consisted primarily of finance receivables was determined using a discounted cash flow approach. The contractual cash flows were adjusted for estimated prepayments, defaults, recoveries and servicing costs and discounted using a discount rate commensurate with risks and maturity inherent in the finance contracts. The contractually required payments receivable, cash flows expected to be collected and fair value for finance receivables acquired with deteriorated credit quality at the acquisition date were $799 million, $728 million and $601 million. The contractually required payments receivable, cash flows not expected to be collected and fair value for other acquired finance receivables were $15.6 billion, $303 million and $14.5 billion. The fair value of secured and unsecured debt was determined using quoted market prices when availablewith the remaining amount allocated to cash, other assets and a discounted cash flow approach when not available.

Weliabilities and the residual goodwill recorded goodwill inof $144 million. In the amount of $144 million for the excess of the aggregate consideration over the fair value of the individualyear ended December 31, 2014 there were no significant adjustments recorded to these assets acquired andor liabilities assumed and such amount is primarily attributed to the value of the incremental GM Financial business expected. The recorded goodwill is subject to further adjustment resulting from the finalization of closing balance sheet audits. Valuations and assumptions pertaining to income taxes are subject to change as additional information is obtained during the measurement period. All of the goodwill was assigned to the GM Financial segment and will be assigned to reporting units, which will be determined pending completion of the remaining acquisitions. The goodwill is not tax deductible.


78



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


assumed. The results of the acquired European and Latin American automotive finance operations are included in GM Financial's results beginning on the dates GM Financial completed each acquisition. The following table summarizes the actual amounts of revenue and earnings included in our consolidated financial statements as well as certainunaudited pro forma revenue and earnings ofnet income attributable to stockholders for the combined entityyear ended December 31, 2013 had these acquisitions occurred as of January 1, 2012 without consideration of historical transactions between the acquired operationswould be $156.3 billion and us, as it is impracticable to obtain such information (dollars in millions):
 Acquired Operations' Amounts Included in Results For Year Ended December 31, 2013 Pro Forma-Combined for Years Ended
  December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Total net sales and revenue$968
 $156,284
 $154,161
Net income attributable to stockholders$109
 $5,492
 $6,412
$5.5 billion.

AcquisitionOn January 2, 2015 GM Financial completed its acquisition of SAIC GM Investment Limited

In September 2012 we obtained control of SAIC GM Investment Limited, the holding company of General Motors India Private Limited and Chevrolet Sales India Private Limited (collectively GM India) with an 86% interest and consolidated GM India and recorded goodwill of $61 million. We also recognized a gain of $51 million which was recorded in Equity income and gain on investments. In addition we invested $125 million in GM India, which increased ourAlly Financial's 40% equity interest in SAIC-GMAC in China. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $1.0 billion, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. Also on January 2, 2015 GM IndiaFinancial sold a 5% equity interest in SAIC-GMAC to 90.8%. ReferSAICFC, a current shareholder of SAIC-GMAC, for proceeds of approximately $120 million, subject to Note 8 for additional detailscertain post-closing adjustments. The valuation of the equity interest acquired was not yet complete at the time of this filing on our investment inForm 10-K because it was not practicable. As a result of these transactions GM India prior to acquisition.indirectly owns 45% of SAIC-GMAC.

Note 44.. Marketable SecuritiesGM Financial Receivables, net

In the year ended December 31, 2013 GM Financial acquired certain international operations in Europe and Latin America from Ally Financial that conduct consumer and commercial lending activities. All of the loans acquired were made on a secured basis.

The following table summarizes the components of consumer and commercial finance receivables, netinformation regarding marketable securities (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 Consumer Commercial Total Consumer Commercial Total
Pre-acquisition finance receivables, outstanding amount$1,294
 $
 $1,294
 $2,162
 $
 $2,162
Pre-acquisition finance receivables, carrying amount$1,174
 $
 $1,174
 $1,958
 $
 $1,958
Post-acquisition finance receivables, net of fees21,956
 6,050
 28,006
 8,831
 560
 9,391
Finance receivables23,130
 6,050
 29,180
 10,789
 560
 11,349
Less: allowance for loan losses(497) (51) (548) (345) (6) (351)
GM Financial receivables, net$22,633
 $5,999
 $28,632
 $10,444
 $554
 $10,998
            
Fair value of GM Financial receivables, net    $28,668
     $11,313

Of the total allowance for loan losses in the above table, $427 million and $266 million were current at December 31, 2013 and 2012.
GM Financial determined the fair value of consumer finance receivables using observable and unobservable inputs within a cash flow model. The inputs reflect assumptions regarding expected prepayments, deferrals, delinquencies, recoveries and charge-offs of the loans within the portfolio. The cash flow model produces an estimated amortization schedule of the finance receivables which is the basis for the calculation of the series of cash flows that derive the fair value of the portfolio. The series of cash flows is calculated and discounted using a weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) using unobservable debt and equity percentages, an unobservable cost of equity and an observable cost of debt based on companies with a similar credit rating and maturity profile as the portfolio. Macroeconomic factors could negatively affect the credit performance of the portfolio and therefore could potentially affect the assumptions used in GM Financial's cash flow model. Substantially all commercial finance receivables either have variable interest rates and maturities of one year or less, or were acquired or originated within the past year. Therefore, the carrying amount is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value.

79
69



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 Fair Value Level December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
  Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents         
Available-for-sale securities         
U.S. government and agencies2 $1,600
 $1,600
 $1,437
 $1,437
Sovereign debt2 774
 774
 515
 515
Money market funds1 2,480
 2,480
 1,262
 1,262
Corporate debt2 6,036
 6,036
 7,598
 7,598
Total available-for-sale securities  $10,890
 10,890
 $10,812
 10,812
Trading securities         
Sovereign debt2   431
   
Corporate debt2   
   25
Total trading securities    431
   25
Total marketable securities classified as cash equivalents    11,321
   10,837
Cash, cash equivalents and time deposits    7,633
   9,184
Total cash and cash equivalents    $18,954
   $20,021
Marketable securities         
Available-for-sale securities         
U.S. government and agencies2 $5,957
 $5,957
 $5,343
 $5,344
Corporate debt2 2,000
 1,998
 1,889
 1,891
Total available-for-sale securities  $7,957
 7,955
 $7,232
 7,235
Trading securities – sovereign debt2   1,267
   1,737
Total marketable securities    $9,222
   $8,972
Restricted cash and marketable securities         
Available-for-sale securities         
Money market funds1 $1,381
 $1,381
 $897
 $897
Other2 45
 46
 34
 35
Total marketable securities classified as restricted cash and marketable securities  $1,426
 1,427
 $931
 932
Restricted cash and cash equivalents and time deposits    846
   1,144
Total restricted cash and marketable securities    $2,273
   $2,076

We are required to post cash and marketable securities as collateral as part of certain agreements that we enter into as part of our operations. Cash and marketable securities subject to contractual restrictions and not readily available are classified as Restricted cash and marketable securities. Restricted cash and marketable securities are invested in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreements and include amounts related to various deposits, escrows and other cash collateral.

GM Financial reviews its pre-acquisition finance receivables portfolios for differences between contractual cash flowsSales proceeds from investments classified as available-for-sale and sold prior to maturity were $5.9 billion, $4.7 billion and $4.7 billion in the cash flows expected to be collected to determine if the difference is attributable,years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Cumulative unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and net unrealized gains and losses on trading securities were insignificant at leastand in part, to credit quality. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 as a result of improvements in credit performance of the pre-acquisition finance receivables, GM Financial transferred the amount of excess cash flows from the non-accretable difference to accretable yield. GM Financial will recognize this excess as finance charge income over the remaining life of the portfolio..

The following table summarizes the activity for accretable yieldamortized cost and the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale by contractual maturity at December 31, 2014 (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012
Balance at beginning of period$404
 $737
Ally Financial international operations acquisition127
  
Accretion of accretable yield(342) (503)
Transfer from non-accretable difference74
 170
Effect of foreign currency(8) 
Balance at end of period$255
 $404
 Amortized Cost Fair Value
Due in one year or less$14,461
 $14,461
Due after one year through five years1,951
 1,950
Total contractual maturities of available-for-sale securities$16,412
 $16,411

The following table summarizes activity for the allowance for loan losses on consumer and commercial finance receivables (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,(a)
 2013 2012 2011
Balance at beginning of period$351
 $179
 $26
Provision for loan losses475
 304
 178
Charge-offs(643) (304) (66)
Recoveries362
 172
 41
Effect of foreign currency3
 
 
Balance at end of period$548
 $351
 $179
________
(a)The balances and activity of the allowance for commercial loan losses included in the amounts at and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were insignificant.

Credit Quality

Consumer Finance Receivables

GM Financial uses proprietary scoring systems that measure the credit quality of the receivables using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores (e.g. FICO score) and contract characteristics. In addition to GM Financial's proprietary scoring systems GM Financial considers other individual consumer factors such as employment history, financial stability and capacity to pay. Subsequent to origination GM Financial reviews the credit quality of retail receivables based on customer payment activity. At the time of loan origination substantially all of GM Financial's international consumers have prime credit scores. In North America sub-prime is typically defined as a loan with a borrower that has a FICO score of less than 620. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 88% and 84% of the consumer finance receivables in North America were consumers with FICO scores less than 620.

An account is considered delinquent if a substantial portion of a scheduled payment has not been received by the date such payment was contractually due. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the accrual of finance charge income has been suspended on delinquent consumer finance receivables based on contractual amounts due of $642 million and $503 million.

GM Financial purchases consumer finance contracts from automobile dealers without recourse and, accordingly, the dealer has no liability to GM Financial if the consumer defaults on the contract. Finance receivables are collateralized by vehicle titles and GM Financial has the right to repossess the vehicle in the event the consumer defaults on the payment terms of the contract.

80
70



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Peugeot S.A.

The following table summarizesIn December 2013 we sold our seven percent investment in Peugeot S. A. (PSA) common stock for $339 million, net of disposal costs and we recorded a net gain of $152 million in Interest income and other non-operating income, net.

At December 31, 2012 we determined that the contractualcarrying amount of delinquent contracts, which is not materially differentour investment in PSA common stock was impaired and that the impairment was other-than-temporary. As a result we transferred the total unrealized losses from the recorded investmentAccumulated other comprehensive loss to Interest income and other non-operating income, net resulting in an impairment charge of the consumer finance receivables (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 Amount Percent of Contractual Amount Due Amount Percent of Contractual Amount Due
Delinquent contracts       
31-to-60 days$952
 4.1% $672
 6.1%
Greater-than-60 days408
 1.7% 230
 2.1%
Total finance receivables more than 30 days delinquent1,360
 5.8% 902
 8.2%
In repossession41
 0.2% 31
 0.3%
Total finance receivables more than 30 days delinquent or in repossession$1,401
 6.0% $933
 8.5%
Impaired Finance Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings
The following table summarizes the outstanding recorded investment for consumer finance receivables that are considered to be TDRs and the related allowance (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Outstanding recorded investment$767
 $228
Less: allowance for loan losses(103) (32)
Outstanding recorded investment, net of allowance$664
 $196
    
Unpaid principal balance$779
 $232

Commercial Finance Receivables

GM Financial's commercial finance receivables consist of dealer financings. A proprietary model is used to assign a risk rating to each dealer. A credit review of each dealer is performed at least annually and, if necessary, the dealer's risk rating is adjusted on the basis of the review. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the commercial finance receivables or loans on non-accrual status were insignificant.

The following table summarizes the credit risk profile by dealer grouping of the commercial finance receivables (dollars in millions): 
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Group I - Dealers with strong to superior financial metrics$549
 $99
Group II - Dealers with fair to favorable financial metrics1,460
 278
Group III - Dealers with marginal to weak financial metrics1,982
 171
Group IV - Dealers with poor financial metrics1,462
 12
Group V - Dealers warranting special mention due to potential weaknesses385
  
Group VI - Dealers with loans classified as substandard, doubtful or impaired212
  
 $6,050
 $560

The credit lines for Group VI dealers are suspended and no further funding is extended to these dealers. $220 million.

Note 5.Marketable SecuritiesGM Financial Receivables, net

The following table summarizes information regarding marketable securitiesthe components of consumer and commercial finance receivables, net (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
 Consumer Commercial Total Consumer Commercial Total
Pre-acquisition finance receivables, outstanding amount$508
 $
 $508
 $1,294
 $
 $1,294
Pre-acquisition finance receivables, carrying amount$459
 $
 $459
 $1,174
 $
 $1,174
Post-acquisition finance receivables, net of fees25,164
 7,606
 32,770
 21,956
 6,050
 28,006
Finance receivables25,623
 7,606
 33,229
 23,130
 6,050
 29,180
Less: allowance for loan losses(655) (40) (695) (497) (51) (548)
GM Financial receivables, net$24,968
 $7,566
 $32,534
 $22,633
 $5,999
 $28,632
            
Fair value of GM Financial receivables, net    $33,106
     $28,668

Allowance for loan losses classified as current at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $529 million and $427 million.
GM Financial determines the fair value of consumer finance receivables using observable and unobservable inputs within a cash flow model. The inputs reflect assumptions regarding expected prepayments, deferrals, delinquencies, recoveries and charge-offs of the loans within the portfolio. The cash flow model produces an estimated amortization schedule of the finance receivables which is the basis for the calculation of the series of cash flows that derive the fair value of the portfolio. The series of cash flows are calculated and discounted using a weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) or current interest rates. The WACC uses unobservable debt and equity percentages, an unobservable cost of equity and an observable cost of debt based on companies with a similar credit rating and maturity profile as the portfolio. Macroeconomic factors could affect the credit performance of the portfolio and therefore could potentially affect the assumptions used in GM Financial's cash flow model. A substantial majority of commercial finance receivables have variable interest rates and maturities of one year or less. Therefore, the carrying amount is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value.

The following table summarizes activity for the allowance for loan losses on consumer and commercial finance receivables (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Balance at beginning of period$548
 $351
 $179
Provision for loan losses604
 475
 304
Charge-offs(914) (643) (304)
Recoveries470
 362
 172
Effect of foreign currency(13) 3
 
Balance at end of period$695
 $548
 $351

The balances and activity of the allowance for commercial loan losses were insignificant at and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

71



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



Credit Quality

Consumer Finance Receivables

81GM Financial uses proprietary scoring systems that measure the credit quality of the receivables using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores (e.g. FICO scores) and contract characteristics. In addition to GM Financial's proprietary scoring systems GM Financial considers other individual consumer factors such as employment history, financial stability and capacity to pay. Subsequent to origination GM Financial reviews the credit quality of retail receivables based on customer payment activity. At the time of loan origination substantially all of GM Financial's international consumers have prime credit scores. At the time of loan origination many consumers in North America had sub-prime credit scores, which are defined as FICO scores of less than 620. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, 83% and 88% of the consumer finance receivables in North America were from consumers with FICO scores of less than 620.

GM Financial purchases consumer finance contracts from automobile dealers without recourse, and accordingly, the dealer has no liability to GM Financial if the consumer defaults on the contract. Finance receivables are collateralized by vehicle titles and GM Financial has the right to repossess the vehicle in the event the consumer defaults on the payment terms of the contract.

An account is considered delinquent if a substantial portion of a scheduled payment has not been received by the date such payment was contractually due. At December 31, 2014 and 2013 the accrual of finance charge income has been suspended on delinquent consumer finance receivables with contractual amounts due of $682 million and $642 million. The following table summarizes the contractual amount of delinquent contracts, which is not significantly different than the recorded investment of the consumer finance receivables (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
 Amount Percent of Contractual Amount Due Amount Percent of Contractual Amount Due
31-to-60 days delinquent$1,083
 4.2% $952
 4.1%
Greater-than-60 days delinquent432
 1.7% 408
 1.7%
Total finance receivables more than 30 days delinquent1,515
 5.9% 1,360
 5.8%
In repossession40
 0.2% 41
 0.2%
Total finance receivables more than 30 days delinquent or in repossession$1,555
 6.1% $1,401
 6.0%
Impaired Finance Receivables - TDRs
The following table summarizes the outstanding recorded investment for consumer finance receivables that are considered to be TDRs and the related allowance (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Outstanding recorded investment$1,234
 $767
Less: allowance for loan losses(172) (103)
Outstanding recorded investment, net of allowance$1,062
 $664
    
Unpaid principal balance$1,255
 $779

Commercial Finance Receivables

GM Financial's commercial finance receivables consist of dealer financings, primarily for inventory purchases. A proprietary model is used to assign a risk rating to each dealer. A credit review of each dealer is performed at least annually and, if necessary, the dealer's risk rating is adjusted on the basis of the review. At December 31, 2014 and 2013 the commercial finance receivables on non-accrual status were insignificant. The following table summarizes the credit risk profile by dealer grouping of the commercial finance receivables (dollars in millions): 

72



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


   December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 Fair Value Level Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents         
Available-for-sale securities         
U.S. government and agencies2 $1,437
 $1,437
 $4,190
 $4,190
Sovereign debt2 515
 515
 
 
Money market funds1 1,262
 1,262
 1,799
 1,799
Corporate debt2 7,598
 7,598
 3,222
 3,222
Total available-for-sale securities  $10,812
 10,812
 $9,211
 9,211
Trading securities         
Sovereign debt2   
   1,408
Corporate debt2   25
   
Total trading securities    25
   1,408
Total marketable securities classified as cash equivalents    10,837
   10,619
Cash, cash equivalents and time deposits    9,184
   7,803
Total cash and cash equivalents    $20,021
   $18,422
Marketable securities - current         
Available-for-sale securities         
U.S. government and agencies2 $5,343
 $5,344
 $1,231
 $1,231
Corporate debt2 1,867
 1,869
 2,465
 2,505
Equity and sovereign debt1 & 2 22
 22
 30
 51
Total available-for-sale securities  $7,232
 7,235
 $3,726
 3,787
Trading securities - Sovereign debt2   1,737
   5,201
Total marketable securities - current    8,972
   8,988
Marketable securities - non-current         
Available-for-sale securities - Investment in Peugeot S.A.1 $
 
 $179
 179
Total marketable securities    $8,972
   $9,167
Restricted cash and marketable securities         
Available-for-sale securities         
Money market funds1 $897
 $897
 $933
 $933
Other2 34
 35
 198
 199
Total marketable securities classified as restricted cash and marketable securities  $931
 932
 $1,131
 1,132
Restricted cash and cash equivalents and time deposits    1,144
   236
Total restricted cash and marketable securities    $2,076
   $1,368
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Group I - Dealers with superior financial metrics$1,050
 $549
Group II - Dealers with strong financial metrics2,022
 1,460
Group III - Dealers with fair financial metrics2,599
 1,982
Group IV - Dealers with weak financial metrics1,173
 1,462
Group V - Dealers warranting special mention due to potential weaknesses524
 385
Group VI - Dealers with loans classified as substandard, doubtful or impaired238
 212
 $7,606
 $6,050

WeThe credit lines for Group VI dealers are requiredtypically suspended and no further funding is extended to post cash and marketable securities as collateral as part of certain agreements that we enter into as part of our operations. Cash and marketable securities subject to contractual restrictions and not readily available are classified as Restricted cash and marketable securities. Restricted cash and marketable securities are invested in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreements and include amounts related to various deposits, escrows and other cash collateral.

Sales proceeds from investments classified as available-for-sale and sold prior to maturity were $4.7 billion, $4.7 billion and $1.6 billion in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale by contractual maturity at December 31, 2013 (dollars in millions):

82



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 Amortized Cost Fair Value
Due in one year or less$14,879
 $14,881
Due after one year through five years1,937
 1,939
Total contractual maturities of available-for-sale securities$16,816
 $16,820

Cumulative unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and net unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities were insignificant at and in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Peugeot S.A.

In December 2013 we sold our seven percent investment in Peugeot S. A. (PSA) common stock for $339 million, net of disposal costs and we recorded a net gain of $152 million in Interest income and other non-operating income, net.

At December 31, 2012 we measured the fair value of our investment in PSA common stock using the published stock price and determined the carrying amount of our investment in PSA common stock exceeded its fair value. PSA’s stock price had shown no sustained signs of recovery towards the price at which we acquired it in March 2012. Based upon the 55% decline in PSA common stock price since our acquisition and the nine month duration of the impairment, combined with our fourth quarter reassessment of our European automotive operations, we concluded that the impairment of our investment in PSA common stock was other-than-temporary. As a result we transferred the total unrealized losses from Accumulated other comprehensive loss to Interest income and other non-operating income, net resulting in an impairment charge of $220 million.these dealers. 

Note 6. Inventories

The following table summarizes the components of Inventories (dollars in millions):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Productive material, supplies and work in process$5,872
 $6,560
$5,380
 $5,872
Finished product, including service parts8,167
 8,154
8,262
 8,167
Total inventories$14,039
 $14,714
$13,642
 $14,039

Note 7. Equipment on Operating Leases, net

Automotive

Equipment on operating leases, net is composed of vehicle sales to daily rental car companies.companies with a guaranteed repurchase obligation. The following table summarizestables summarize information related to Equipment on operating leases, net (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Equipment on operating leases$2,605
 $1,946
Less: accumulated depreciation(207) (164)
Equipment on operating leases, net$2,398
 $1,782

The following table summarizes depreciation expense and impairment charges related to Equipment on operating leases, net (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Equipment on operating leases$3,822
 $2,605
Less: accumulated depreciation(258) (207)
Equipment on operating leases, net$3,564
 $2,398
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Depreciation expense$218
 $227
 $431
$507
 $218
 $227
Impairment charges$168
 $181
 $151
$155
 $168
 $181
        
Automotive Financing - GM Financial


83



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


GM Financial originates leases in the U.S. and Canada that are recorded as operating leases. A Canadian subsidiary of GM Financial originates and sells leases to a third-party with servicing retained. The following table summarizes GM Financial equipment on operating leases, net (dollars in millions):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
GM Financial equipment on operating leases$4,025
 $1,910
$8,268
 $4,025
Less: accumulated depreciation(642) (261)(1,208) (642)
GM Financial equipment on operating leases, net$3,383
 $1,649
$7,060
 $3,383

Depreciation expense related to GM Financial equipment on operating leases, net was $868 million, $450 million $205 million and $70$205 million in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.2012.


73



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


The following table summarizes minimum rental payments due to GM Financial as lessor under operating leases (dollars in millions):

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Minimum rental receipts under operating leases$628

$512

$266

$43

$4

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Minimum rental receipts under operating leases$1,241

$1,019

$597

$98

$5

Note 8. Equity in Net Assets of Nonconsolidated Affiliates

Nonconsolidated affiliates are entities in which an equity ownership interest is maintained and for which the equity method of accounting is used due to the ability to exert significant influence over decisions relating to their operating and financial affairs.

The following table summarizes information regarding Equity income and gain on investments (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
China joint ventures (China JVs)$1,763
 $1,521
 $1,511
New Delphi (including gain on disposition)
 
 1,727
Others (including gain on acquisition of GM India)47
 41
 (46)
Total equity income and gain on investments$1,810
 $1,562
 $3,192

Sales and income of our joint venturesChina JVs are not consolidated into our financial statements; rather, our proportionate share of the earnings of each joint venture is reflected as Equity income. The following table summarizes information regarding Equity income and gain on investments.(dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
China JVs$2,066
 $1,763
 $1,521
Others28
 47
 41
Total equity income$2,094
 $1,810
 $1,562

We received dividends from nonconsolidated affiliates of $1.8 billion, $1.7 billion, $1.4 billion and $1.21.4 billion in the years ended December 31, 20132014, 20122013 and 20112012. At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 we had undistributed earnings including dividends declared but not received of $1.8$2.0 billion and $1.71.8 billion related to our nonconsolidated affiliates.

Investment in China JVs

The following table summarizes our direct ownership interests in China JVs:

84



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Shanghai General Motors Co., Ltd. (SGM)50% 50%50% 50%
Shanghai GM Norsom Motor Co., Ltd. (SGM Norsom)25% 25%25% 25%
Shanghai GM Dong Yue Motors Co., Ltd. (SGM DY)25% 25%25% 25%
Shanghai GM Dong Yue Powertrain (SGM DYPT)25% 25%25% 25%
SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co., Ltd.44% 44%44% 44%
FAW-GM Light Duty Commercial Vehicle Co., Ltd.50% 50%50% 50%
Pan Asia Technical Automotive Center Co., Ltd.50% 50%50% 50%
Shanghai OnStar Telematics Co., Ltd. (Shanghai OnStar)40% 40%40% 40%
Shanghai Chengxin Used Car Operation and Management Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Chengxin Used Car)33% 33%33% 33%
SAIC General Motors Sales Co., Ltd. (SGMS)49% 49%49% 49%

SGM is a joint venture established by Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) (50%(50%) and us (50%(50%). SGM has interests in three other joint ventures in China: SGM Norsom, SGM DY and SGM DYPT. These three joint ventures are jointly held by SGM (50%(50%), SAIC (25%(25%) and us (25%(25%). These four joint ventures are engaged in the production, import and sale of a comprehensive range of products under the Buick, Chevrolet and Cadillac brands. SGM also has interests in Shanghai OnStar (20%(20%) and Shanghai Chengxin Used Car (33%(33%). SGM also has a 20% equity interest in GMAC-SAIC,SAIC-GMAC, a joint venture established by General Motors Acceptance Corporation (now Ally Financial) (40%(40%) and SAIC Finance Co., Ltd. (40%SAICFC (40%). As a result of GM Financial's transactions on January 2, 2015 GM Financial now owns 35% of SAIC-GMAC and SAICFC owns 45%.

SGMS is a joint venture established in November 2011 by SAIC (51%(51%) and us (49%(49%) to engage in the sales of the imported Buick, Chevrolet and Cadillac brands and the sales of automobiles manufactured by SGM.


In September 2012 we repurchased a 1% interest in SGM for a total consideration of $119 million, increasing our ownership interest in SGM to 50%. The transaction was accounted for by applying the equity method of accounting. The consideration exceeded our proportionate share of the 1% interest in SGM net assets by $82 million, which consists of plant, property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill of $8 million, $36 million and $38 million.
74


Sale

Table of New DelphiContents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)

In March 2011 we sold our Class A Membership Interests in Delphi Automotive LLP (New Delphi) to New Delphi for $3.8 billion. The Class A Membership Interests sold represented 100% of our direct and indirect interests in New Delphi and 100% of New Delphi's Class A Membership Interests issued and outstanding. The sale terminated any direct and indirect obligation to loan New Delphi up to $500 million under a term loan facility established in October 2009 when New Delphi was created and the Class A Membership Interests were issued. New Delphi had not borrowed under this loan facility. In March 2011 we recorded a gain of $1.6 billion related to the sale in Equity income and gain on investments. Our existing supply contracts with New Delphi were not affected by this transaction.

Investment in GM India

In March 2011 the fair value of our investment in GM India was determined to be less than its carrying amount. The loss in value was determined to be other-than-temporary; therefore, we recorded an impairment charge of $39 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011. In addition we recorded other charges totaling $67 million related to our investment in GM India. Refer to Note 3 for detail regarding the acquisition of GM India.

Investment in and Summarized Financial Data of Nonconsolidated Affiliates

The following table summarizes the carrying amount of investments in nonconsolidated affiliates (dollars in millions):

85



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
China JVs$7,851
 $6,579
$8,140
 $7,851
Other investments243
 304
210
 243
Total equity in net assets of nonconsolidated affiliates$8,094
 $6,883
$8,350
 $8,094

At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 the carrying amount of our investments in certain joint ventures exceeded our share of the underlying net assets by $3.8$3.9 billion. These differences are and $3.8 billion primarily related to goodwill from the application of fresh-start reporting and purchase of additional interests in nonconsolidated affiliates, of which $3.4 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were allocated to goodwill and the remainder was allocated to the underlying assets and liabilities, primarily intangibles, and are being amortized over their useful lives.affiliates.

The following tables present summarized financial data for all of our nonconsolidated affiliates (dollars in millions):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
China JVs Others Total China JVs Others TotalChina JVs Others Total China JVs Others Total
Summarized Balance Sheet Data                      
Current assets$14,666
 $2,234
 $16,900
 $11,759
 $2,642
 $14,401
$15,442
 $2,636
 $18,078
 $14,666
 $2,234
 $16,900
Non-current assets8,187
 1,458
 9,645
 6,766
 1,507
 8,273
9,758
 1,507
 11,265
 8,187
 1,458
 9,645
Total assets$22,853
 $3,692
 $26,545
 $18,525
 $4,149
 $22,674
$25,200
 $4,143
 $29,343
 $22,853
 $3,692
 $26,545
                      
Current liabilities$14,019
 $1,859
 $15,878
 $12,612
 $1,893
 $14,505
$16,141
 $2,179
 $18,320
 $14,019
 $1,859
 $15,878
Non-current liabilities1,065
 511
 1,576
 756
 758
 1,514
931
 495
 1,426
 1,065
 511
 1,576
Total liabilities$15,084
 $2,370
 $17,454
 $13,368
 $2,651
 $16,019
$17,072
 $2,674
 $19,746
 $15,084
 $2,370
 $17,454
                      
Non-controlling interests$1,040
 $
 $1,040
 $1,055
 $1
 $1,056
$1,043
 $3
 $1,046
 $1,040
 $
 $1,040
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Summarized Operating Data          
China JV's net sales$38,767
 $33,364
 $30,511
China JVs' net sales$43,853
 $38,767
 $33,364
Others' net sales1,830
 3,963
 4,242
3,171
 1,830
 3,963
Total net sales$40,597
 $37,327
 $34,753
$47,024
 $40,597
 $37,327
          
China JV's net income$3,685
 $3,198
 $3,203
China JVs' net income$4,312
 $3,685
 $3,198
Others' net income (loss)50
 (23) (13)91
 50
 (23)
Total net income$3,735
 $3,175
 $3,190
$4,403
 $3,735
 $3,175

Transactions with Nonconsolidated Affiliates

Nonconsolidated affiliates are involved in various aspects of the development, production and marketing of cars, trucks and automobile parts. We purchase component parts and vehicles from certain nonconsolidated affiliates for resale to dealers. We also sell component parts and vehicles to certain nonconsolidated affiliates. The following tables summarize the effects of transactions with nonconsolidated affiliates (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Automotive sales and revenue$2,762
 $2,724
 $2,572
Automotive purchases, net$311
 $724
 $497
Interest income and other non-operating income, net$23
 $19
 $184
Operating cash flows$4,321
 $3,607
 $3,385

86
75



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Results of Operations     
Automotive sales and revenue$2,724
 $2,572
 $3,266
Automotive purchases, net$724
 $497
 $1,044
Interest income and other non-operating income, net$19
 $184
 $34

 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Financial Position   
Accounts and notes receivable, net$756
 $1,668
Accounts payable$183
 $167
Deferred revenue and customer deposits$32
 $46

 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Cash Flows     
Operating$3,607
 $3,385
 $3,624
Investing$(13) $(41) $(27)
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Accounts and notes receivable, net$706
 $756
Accounts payable$205
 $183

Note 9. Property, net

The following table summarizes the components of Property, net (dollars in millions):
Estimated Useful Lives in Years December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012Estimated Useful Lives in Years December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Land
 $1,868
 $2,107

 $1,695
 $1,868
Buildings and improvements5-40 4,971
 4,601
5-40 5,236
 4,971
Machinery and equipment3-27 15,222
 12,720
3-27 16,788
 15,222
Construction in progress
 2,644
 3,018

 4,114
 2,644
Real estate, plants and equipment 24,705
 22,446
 27,833
 24,705
Less: accumulated depreciation (6,787) (5,556) (8,067) (6,787)
Real estate, plants and equipment, net 17,918
 16,890
 19,766
 17,918
Special tools, net1-15 7,949
 7,306
1-15 7,977
 7,949
Total property, net $25,867
 $24,196
 $27,743
 $25,867

The amount of capitalized software included in Property, net was $817 million and $630 million in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. The amount of interest capitalized and excluded from Automotive interest expense related to Property, net was $70 million, $81 million $117 million and $91$117 million in the years ended December 31, 20132014, 20122013 and 20112012.

The following table summarizes the amount of capitalized software included indepreciation, amortization and impairment charges related to Property, net (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Capitalized software in use, net$580
 $465
Capitalized software in the process of being developed$50
 $108

The following table summarizes depreciation, impairment charges and amortization expense related to Property, net, recorded in Automotive cost of sales, GM Financial operating and other expenses, and Automotive selling, general and administrative expense (dollars in millions):

87



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Depreciation and amortization expense$3,959
 $3,888
 $3,604
$4,187
 $3,959
 $3,888
Impairment charges(a)901
 3,793
 81
709
 901
 3,793
Depreciation, impairment charges and amortization expense$4,860
 $7,681
 $3,685
Depreciation, amortization and impairment charges$4,896
 $4,860
 $7,681
          
Capitalized software amortization expense(b)$244
 $209
 $203
$295
 $244
 $209
__________
(a)
Includes impairment charges of $321 million and $179 million at GMIO and GME whose assets whosewere written down to fair value was $131values of $85 million and $11 million at December 31, 2013. Includes GME assets whose fair value was $408 million at December 31, 2012.2014. Also includes other assets whose fair value was determined to be $0 in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 measured utilizing Level 3 inputs. Fair value measurements of the non-GMIO and non-GME asset group long-lived assets utilized projected cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the perceived business risks related to the assets involved.
(b)Included in total depreciation, impairment charges and amortization expense.

Impairment Charges

Year Ended December 31, 2013

GM IndiaGMIO

In the three months ended December 31, 2013 we performedAs a result of our strategic assessment of GM India in response to lower than expected sales performance of our current product offerings in India, higher raw material costs, unfavorable foreign exchange rates and recent deterioration in local market conditions. Our strategic review indicated that the existing long-lived assets of the GM India asset group were not recoverable. In the three months ended December 31, 2013conditions we recorded asset impairment charges of $280 million to adjust the carrying amount of GM India’s real and personal property to fair value of $45 million. These charges were recorded in our GMIO segment in Automotive cost of sales. Our recoverability test of the GM IndiaWe also recorded intangible asset group also included Intangible assets, net and Goodwill resulting in additionalgoodwill impairment charges of $103 million, for total impairment charges of $383 million. The noncontrolling interest portion of these

76



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


charges was $35 million based on our 90.8% ownership of GM India. Refer to Note 11 for additional information regarding the impairment of Intangible assets, net and Note 10 for additional information regarding the impairment of Goodwill.

GM Holden Ltd. (Holden)

In December 2013 we announcedAs a result of our plans to cease manufacturing and significantly reduce engineering at our GM Holden Ltd. (Holden) subsidiary in Australia by the end of 2017. As a result2017 we recorded asset impairment charges of $477 million to adjust the carrying amounts of certain long-lived assets of our Holden asset group to fair value of $71 million. These charges were recorded in our GMIO segment in Automotive cost of sales. Refer to Note 19 for additional information on the actions taken at Holden.

Year Ended December 31, 2012

During the second half of 2011 and continuing into 2012 the European automotive industry was severely affected by the ongoing sovereign debt crisis, high unemployment and a lack of consumer confidence coupled with overcapacity and we began to experience deterioration in cash flows. In response we formulated a plan to implement various actions to strengthen our operations and increase our competitiveness. During the fourth quarter of 2012 our European industry outlook deteriorated further and our forecast of 2013 cash flows declined notwithstanding our actions. As a result we performed aof our recoverability test of the GME asset group by weighting various undiscounted cash flow scenarios and concluded the GME asset group was not recoverable. Accordingly we recorded asset impairment charges of $3.7 billion at December 31, 2012 to adjust the carrying amount of the GME real and personal property to fair value of $0.4 billion. These charges were recorded in our GME segment with $3.5 billion recordedprimarily in Automotive cost of sales and $0.2 billionsales. We also recorded in Automotive selling, general and administrative expense. Our recoverability test of the GMEintangible asset group also included Intangible assets, net and other long-lived assets resulting in additionalasset impairment charges of $1.8 billion, for total impairment charges of $5.5 billion. Refer to Note 11 for additional information regarding the impairment of Intangible assets, net.

Fair Value Measurements


88



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


To determine the estimated fair value of real and personal property, the cost approach, market approach and income approach were considered. Under the cost approach, the determination of fair value considered the estimates of the cost to construct or purchase a new asset of equal utility at current prices with adjustments in value for physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and economic obsolescence. Under the market approach, the determination of fair value considered the market prices in transactions for similar assets and certain direct market values based on quoted prices from brokers and secondary market participants for similar assets. Under the income approach, the determination of fair value considered the estimate of the present worth of future benefits derived from ownership, usually measured through the capitalization of a specific level of income which can be derived from the subject asset with adjustments in value for demolition costs and for the effect of an estimated holding period. Under the income approach, it was assumed fair value could not exceed the present value of the net cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the level of risk inherent in the subject asset. An in-exchange premise was determined to be the highest and best use.

The following table summarizes the significant Level 3 inputs for real and personal property measurements:
 Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input(s) Range
GM India personal propertyMarket approach Economic obsolescence(a) 72% - 100%
Holden real propertyIncome approach Holding period(b) 0 - 3 years
   Discount rate(c) 11% - 12%
GME real propertyMarket approach Demolition costs(d) 6% - 23%
 Cost approach Holding period(b) 0 - 4 years
 Income approach Discount rate(c) 11.2% - 14.5%
GME personal propertyMarket approach Physical deterioration(e) 52% - 69%
 Cost approach Functional obsolescence(f) 8% - 28%
   Economic obsolescence(a) 17% - 23%
__________
(a)Represents estimated loss in asset value caused by factors external to the asset such as legislative enactments, changes in use, social change and change in supply and demand.
(b)Represents estimated marketing period for each property which dictates the amount of property specific holding costs to be incurred such as real estate taxes.
(c)Represents the discount rate for the specific property based on local market sources and available benchmarking data.
(d)Represents estimated gross cost to demolish and clear the structures on the property as a percentage of replacement cost new.
(e)Represents estimated loss in asset value due to wear and tear, action of the elements and other physical factors that reduce the life and serviceability of the asset.
(f)Represents estimated loss in asset value caused by inefficiencies and inadequacies of the asset itself.


77



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


The personal property in our Holden asset group was determined to have a nominal fair value because of anticipated losses during the wind-down period and limited to no salvage value given the decline in the automotive manufacturing base in Australia.

The fair value estimates for GM India, Holden and GME real and personal property are based on a valuation premise that assumes the assets' highest and best use are different than their current use based on the forecasted financial results of the asset groups.

Note 10. Goodwill
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amounts of Goodwill (dollars in millions):

89



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Total Automotive GM Financial TotalAutomotive GM Financial Total
Balance at January 1, 2012$26,399
 $581
 $610
 $151
 $27,741
 $1,278
 $29,019
Impairment charges(26,399) (590) (156) 
 (27,145) 
 (27,145)
Goodwill from business combinations(a)
 
 61
 
 61
 
 61
Effect of foreign currency and other
 9
 34
 (5) 38
 
 38
Balance at December 31, 2012
 
 549
 146
 695
 1,278
 1,973
Balance at January 1, 2013$695
 $1,278
 $1,973
Impairment charges
 
 (541) 
 (541) 
 (541)(541) 
 (541)
Goodwill from business combinations(a)
 
 
 10
 10
 144
 154
10
 144
 154
Effect of foreign currency and other
 
 (8) (18) (26) 
 (26)(26) 
 (26)
Balance at December 31, 2013$
 $
 $
 $138
 $138
 $1,422
 $1,560
138
 1,422
 1,560
Impairment charges(120) 
 (120)
Effect of foreign currency and other(18) 5
 (13)
Balance at December 31, 2014$
 $1,427
 $1,427
                  
Accumulated impairment charges at January 1, 2012$
 $(2,482) $(270) $
 $(2,752) $
 $(2,752)
Accumulated impairment charges at December 31, 2012$(26,399) $(3,072) $(426) $
 $(29,897) $
 $(29,897)
Accumulated impairment charges at January 1, 2013$(29,897) $
 $(29,897)
Accumulated impairment charges at December 31, 2013$(26,399) $(3,072) $(967) $
 $(30,438) $
 $(30,438)$(30,438) $
 $(30,438)
Accumulated impairment charges at December 31, 2014$(30,558) $
 $(30,558)
_________
(a)
Refer to Note 3 for additional information concerning the acquisitions.

In the three months endedThe total automotive Goodwill balance at December 31, 2013 2012, and 2011 we performedwas recorded in GMSA. In addition to our annual goodwill impairment testing as of October 1 for all reporting units. In addition, in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011,tests we performed event-driven goodwill impairment tests at various dates for certain of our reporting units.units in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

GMSA

Based on the results of our annual goodwill impairment tests we recorded total Goodwill impairment charges of $120 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The impairment charges primarily resulted from lower forecasted profitability in Brazil resulting from recent deterioration in local market conditions and in Venezuela resulting from challenging local market conditions, including unfavorable foreign exchange rates and the recent downward trend in the price of oil. At December 31, 2014 the goodwill balance was $0 for all of the reporting units in GMSA.

GMNA

Subsequent to our 2012 annual goodwill impairment testing,test, we reversed $36.2$36.2 billion of our deferred tax asset valuation allowances for our GMNA reporting unit. The reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowances resulted in the carrying amount of our GMNA reporting unit exceeding its fair value. As a result we performed an event-driven goodwill impairment test in the three months ended December 31, 2012 and recorded a Goodwill impairment charge of $26.4 billion. At December 31, 2012 GMNA's Goodwill balance was $0.$26.4 billion. Refer to Note 18 for additional information on the reversal of our deferred tax asset valuation allowances for our U.S. and Canadian operations.

GME

We adoptedAt the provisionstime of ASU 2010-28, “When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts” (ASU 2010-28) on January 1, 2011 and performed Step 2 of the goodwillour 2012 annual impairment testing analysis fortest our GME reporting unit which had a negative carrying amount resulting in the recognition of a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning Retained earnings. GME continued to have a negative carrying amount and because it was more likely than not further goodwill impairment existed due to further deterioration in the business outlook for GME and increases in the fair value of estimated employee benefit obligations, we recorded Goodwill impairment charges of $590$590 million and $1.0 billion in the yearsyear ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. At December 31, 2012 GME's Goodwill balance was $0.2012.

78



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



GMIO

Based on the results of our annual and event-driven goodwill impairment tests we recorded total Goodwill impairment charges of $541 million, and $156 million and $270 million in the years ended December 31, 2013 2012 and 2011 within our GMIO segment.2012. The impairment charges primarily related to our GM Korea Company (GM Korea) and Holden reporting units. We performed event-driven goodwill impairment tests for GM Korea in 2013 2012 and 20112012 as the fair value of GM Korea continued to be below its carrying amount due to ongoing economic weakness in certain markets to which GM Korea exports coupled with lower forecasted margins resulting from higher raw material costs and unfavorable foreign exchange rates. Furthermore in the three months ended December 31, 2013 we announced our plans to cease mainstream distribution of Chevrolet brand in Western and Central Europe that resulted in the impairment of the remaining goodwill. Chevrolet sales in Europe are included in our GM Korea

90



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


operations. We also recorded a Goodwill impairment charge in the three months ended December 31, 2013 associated with our GM India reporting unit resulting from lower forecasted profitability in India due to lower than expected sales performance of our current product offerings in India, higher raw material costs, unfavorable foreign exchange rates and recent deterioration in local market conditions. Refer to Note 9 for additional information on our operations in India. In the three months ended December 31, 2011 we reversed a deferred tax asset valuation allowance for our Holden reporting unit that resulted in the carrying amount of this reporting unit exceeding its fair value. At December 31, 2013 the goodwill balance was $0 for all of the reporting units in GMIO.

Impairment Charges

The impairment charges recorded as a result of the initial adoption of ASU 2010-28 and the annual and event-driven goodwill impairment tests in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 represent the net decreases in implied goodwill resulting primarily from decreases in the fair value-to-U.S. GAAP differences attributable to those assets and liabilities that gave rise to goodwill upon our application of fresh-start reporting. The net decreases resulted primarily from the reversal of our deferred tax asset valuation allowances for certain reporting units thus resulting in the recorded amount for deferred taxes exceeding their fair values which under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805, "Business Combinations" (ASC 805) results in less implied goodwill. The net decreases also resulted from improvements in our nonperformance risk and in our incremental borrowing rates since July 10, 2009. At certain of the testing dates the net decrease was also due to an increase in the high quality corporate bond rates utilized to measure our employee benefit obligations and a decrease in credit spreads between high quality corporate bond rates and market interest rates for companies with similar nonperformance risk. For the purpose of deriving an implied goodwill balance, deterioration in the business outlook and anticipated restructuring activities for GME and GM Korea resulted in a reduction in the fair value of certain tax attributes and an increase in estimated employee benefit obligations. The amount of implied goodwill derived from GM India decreased primarily from a reduction in the fair value of certain tax attributes.

Fair Value Measurements

When performing our goodwill impairment testing, the fair values of our reporting units were determined based on valuation techniques using the best available information, primarily discounted cash flow projections. We make significant assumptions and estimates, which utilized Level 3 measures, about the extent and timing of future cash flows, growth rates, market share and discount rates that represent unobservable inputs into our valuation methodologies. Our fair value estimates for annual and event-driven impairment tests assume the achievement of the future financial results contemplated in our forecasted cash flows and there can be no assurance that we will realize that value.

The valuation methodologies utilized to perform our goodwill impairment testing were consistent with those used in our application of fresh-start reporting on July 10, 2009 and in any subsequent annual or event-driven goodwill impairment tests and utilized Level 3 measures. Because the fair value of goodwill can be measured only as a residual amount and cannot be determined directly we calculated the implied goodwill for those reporting units failing Step 1 in the same manner that goodwill is recognized in a business combination pursuant to ASC 805.
              
Note 11. Intangible Assets, net

The following table summarizes the components of Intangible assets, net (dollars in millions):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying AmountGross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount
Technology and intellectual property$8,210
 $7,308
 $902
 $7,775
 $6,320
 $1,455
$8,193
 $7,744
 $449
 $8,210
 $7,308
 $902
Brands4,466
 559
 3,907
 4,464
 431
 4,033
4,447
 683
 3,764
 4,466
 559
 3,907
Dealer network and customer relationships1,108
 364
 744
 1,375
 327
 1,048
1,094
 434
 660
 1,108
 364
 744
Favorable contracts and other345
 326
 19
 384
 286
 98
345
 331
 14
 345
 326
 19
Total amortizing intangible assets14,129
 8,557
 5,572
 13,998
 7,364
 6,634
14,079
 9,192
 4,887
 14,129
 8,557
 5,572
Nonamortizing in process research and development96
   96
 175
   175
96
   96
 96
   96
Total intangible assets$14,225
 $8,557
 $5,668
 $14,173
 $7,364
 $6,809
$14,175
 $9,192
 $4,983
 $14,225
 $8,557
 $5,668


91



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


In December 2012 we entered into a product development agreement with PSA to collaborate on the development of certain vehicle platforms, components and modules. As a result of this agreement, in the three months ended March 31, 2013 we acquired the rights to certain technology and intellectual property for total consideration of $642 million.$642 million. Consideration of $201 million was paid in cash in May 2013 with the remaining consideration to be paid by May 2018. The acquired rights were recorded at the present value of the total payments to be made as technology and intellectual property of $594 million.

In December 2013 we agreed with PSA to mutually cancel development of one of the vehicle programs and reduce the amount of remaining consideration to be paid, resulting in a net charge of $49 million recorded in Automotive cost of sales in GMNA. The net charge consisted of an impairment of the associated intellectual property of $211 million and a reduction of total consideration from $642$642 million to $480 million.

The following table summarizes the amortization expense and impairment charges related to Intangible assets, net (dollars in millions):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Amortization expense$1,281
 $1,568
 $1,804
$676
 $1,281
 $1,568
Impairment charges$523
 $1,755
 $
$16
 $523
 $1,755

The following table summarizes estimated amortization expense related to Intangible assets, net in each of the next five years (dollars in millions):
 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Estimated amortization expense$672
 $330
 $310
 $305
 $300
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Estimated amortization expense$332
 $311
 $306
 $302
 $205

79



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



Impairment Charges

Year Ended December 31, 2013

GM IndiaGMIO

In the three months ended December 31, 2013As a result of our strategic assessment of GM India we recorded impairment charges of $48 million to adjust the carrying amounts of Intangible assets, net, primarily favorable contract intangibles, to fair value of $0 because of a lack of economic support associated with GM India's declining operations. These charges were recorded in our GMIO segment primarily in Automotive cost of sales. Refer to Note 9 for additional information regarding the triggering events of the impairment chargecharges in India and information on the impairment of Property, net.GM India.

Withdrawal of the Chevrolet Brand from Europe

In the three months ended December 31, 2013 weWe recorded impairment charges of $264 million to adjust the carrying amounts of Intangible assets, net, primarily dealer network intangibles related to the Chevrolet network in Europe, to fair value of $0 because we are winding down the dealer network in 2014 and we expect to incur losses during the wind-down period. These charges were recorded in our GMIO segment in Automotive cost of sales. Refer to Note 19 for additional information on the withdrawal of the Chevrolet brand from Europe.

Year Ended December 31, 2012

We adjusted the carrying amount of the GME intangible assets to their fair value of $139 million and recorded asset impairment charges of $1.8 billion at December 31, 2012. These charges were recorded in our GME segment with $1.6 billion recordedprimarily in Automotive selling, general and administrative expense and $0.2 billion recorded in Automotive cost of sales.expense. The fair value estimates for GME's intangible assets are based on a valuation premise that assumes the assets' highest and best use are different than their current use due to the overall European macro-economic environment.

Our recoverability test of the GME asset group includes real and personal property, resulting in additional impairment charges of $3.7 billion, for total impairment charges of $5.5 billion. Refer to Note 9 for additional information regarding the impairment of real and personal property.

92



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



To determine the estimated fair value of the brand intangible assets we used the relief from royalty method which is a form of the income approach. Under this approach revenue associated with the brand is projected over the expected remaining useful life of the asset. A royalty rate is then applied to estimate the royalty savings. The royalty rate used was based on an analysis of empirical, market-derived royalty rates for guideline intangible assets and a profit split analysis to determine a rate that is economically supported by GME's forecasted profitability. The net after-tax royalty savings are calculated for each year during the remaining economic life of the asset and discounted to present value.

To determine the estimated fair value of the dealer network we used the cost approach with adjustments in value for the overcapacity of dealers and the sales environment in the region. We determined the fair value to be $0.

The following table summarizes the significant Level 3 inputs for brand intangible assets measurements:
  Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s) Percentage
Brand intangible assets Income approach Long-term growth rate 0.50%
    Pre-tax royalty rate(a) 0.14%
    Discount rate(b) 21.25%
__________
(a)Represents estimated savings realized from owning the asset or having the royalty-free right to use the asset.
(b)Represents WACC adjusted for perceived business risks related to these intangible assets.

Note 12. Variable Interest Entities

Consolidated VIEs

Automotive

VIEs that we do not control through a majority voting interest that are consolidated because we are the primary beneficiary include certain vehicle assembling, manufacturing and selling venture arrangements, the most significant of which is GM Egypt. At December 31, 2013 and 2012: (1) Total assets of these VIEs were $564 million and $436 million, which were composed of Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts and notes receivables, net, Inventories, and Property, net; and (2) Total liabilities were $395 million and $254 million, which were composed of Accounts payable (principally trade) and Accrued liabilities. In the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 Total net sales and revenue recorded for these consolidated VIEs were $1.1 billion and $1.0 billion and Net income was $55 million and $56 million. These amounts are stated prior to intercompany eliminations. Liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating VIEs generally do not represent claims against us or our other subsidiaries and assets recognized generally are for the benefit of the VIEs' operations and cannot be used to satisfy our obligations.

GM Korea and GM India are non-wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries that we control through a majority voting interest. They are also VIEs because in the future they may require additional subordinated financial support. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the combined creditors of GM Korea's and GM India's liabilities of $242 million and $368 million, which were composed of short-term debt, current derivative liabilities and long-term debt, do not have recourse to our general credit.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial Consolidated VIEs

GM Financial uses special purpose entities (SPEs) that are considered VIEs to issue variable funding notes to third party bank-sponsored warehouse facilities or asset-backed securities to investors in securitization transactions. The debt issued by these VIEs is backed by the cash flows related to finance receivables and leasing related assets transferred by GM Financial to the VIEs (Securitized Assets). GM Financial holds variable interests in the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. GM Financial determined that it isthey are the primary beneficiary of the SPEs becausebecause: (1) the servicing responsibilities for the Securitized Assets give itGM Financial the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the VIEsVIEs; and (2) the variable interests in the VIEs give itGM Financial the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive residual returns that could potentially be significant. The assets and liabilities of the VIEs are included in GM Financial's consolidated balance sheets. The amounts are stated prior to intercompany eliminations.

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities related to GM Financial's consolidated VIEs (dollars in millions):

93
80



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


could potentially be significant. The assets and liabilities of the VIEs are included in GM Financial's consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities related to GM Financial's consolidated VIEs prior to intercompany eliminations (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Restricted cash$1,523
 $744
Securitized Assets$23,584
 $10,442
Securitization notes payable and other credit facilities$19,448
 $9,378

Restricted cash represents collections from the underlying Securitized Assets and certain reserve accounts held as credit enhancement for securitizations held by GM Financial for the benefit of the noteholders. Except for the acquisition accounting adjustments, which are not recorded in SPE trusts, GM Financial recognizes finance charge income, leased vehicle income and other income on the Securitized Assets and interest expense on the secured debt issued by the SPEs. GM Financial also maintains an allowance for credit losses on the Securitized Assets. Cash pledged to support the secured borrowings is deposited to a restricted cash account which is invested in highly liquid securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Restricted cash$1,721
 $1,523
Securitized Assets$27,704
 $23,584
Securitization notes payable and other credit facilities$22,794
 $19,448

The assets of the VIEs and the restricted cash held by GM Financial serve as the sole source of repayment for the debt issued by these entities. Restricted cash represents collections from the underlying Securitized Assets and certain reserve accounts held as credit enhancement for securitizations held by GM Financial for the benefit of the noteholders. An additional form of credit enhancement is provided in the form of overcollateralization, whereby more loans or leases are transferred to the VIEs than the amount of asset-backed securities issued by the VIEs. GM Financial also maintains an allowance for estimated probable credit losses on securitized receivables. Cash pledged is invested in highly liquid securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Investors in the notes issued by the VIEs do not have recourse to GM Financial or its other assets, with the exception of customary representation and warranty repurchase provisions and indemnities that GM Financial provides as the servicer. GM Financial is not required and does not currently intend to provide additional financial support to these SPEs. While these subsidiaries are included in ourGM Financial's consolidated financial statements, these subsidiaries are separate legal entities and their assets are legally owned by them and are not available to GM Financial's creditors.

Nonconsolidated VIEs

Automotive

VIEs that are not consolidated include certain vehicle assembling, manufacturing and selling venture arrangements and other automotive related entities to which we provided financial support, including GM India prior to September 2012 and Ally Financial.Note 13. We concluded these entities are VIEs because they do not have sufficient equity at risk or may require additional subordinated financial support. We currently lack the power through voting or similar rights to direct those activities of these entities that most significantly affect their economic performance. Our variable interests in these nonconsolidated VIEs include accountsAccrued Liabilities and notes receivable, equity in net assets, guarantees and financial support, some of which were provided to certain current or previously divested suppliers in order to ensure that supply needs for production were not disrupted due to a supplier's liquidity concerns or possible shutdowns.Other Liabilities

At December 31, 2013 and 2012 our variable interests in these VIEs included: (1) Total assetsThe following table summarizes the components of$169 million and $351 million, which were composed of Accounts and notes receivable, net and Equity in net assets of nonconsolidated affiliates; (2) Total liabilities of $838 million and $1.9 billion, which were composed of Accounts payable (principally trade), Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt, Accrued liabilities and Other liabilities and deferred income taxes; and (3) Total off-balance sheet arrangements of $115 million and $32 million, which were composed of loan commitments and other liquidity arrangements. The amount of total off-balance sheet arrangements at December 31, 2013 includes contractual commitments under an agreement with a supplier that became a VIE(dollars in January 2013. The maximum exposure to loss for total assets approximated the carrying amount at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Refer to Note 17 for additional information on our maximum exposure to loss under agreements with Ally Financial.millions):
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Current   
Dealer and customer allowances, claims and discounts$8,035
 $7,919
Deposits primarily from rental car companies6,089
 4,713
Deferred revenue1,622
 1,276
Product warranty and related liabilities3,582
 2,721
Payrolls and employee benefits excluding postemployment benefits2,144
 2,285
Other6,712
 5,719
Total accrued liabilities$28,184
 $24,633
Non-current   
Deferred revenue$1,556
 $1,249
Product warranty and related liabilities6,064
 4,880
Employee benefits excluding postemployment benefits1,049
 1,192
Postemployment benefits including facility idling reserves1,259
 1,216
Other4,154
 4,816
Total other liabilities$14,082
 $13,353

Ally Financial Common Stock

At December 31, 2012 we held a 9.9% common equity ownership in Ally Financial with carrying amount and fair value of $399 million and $1.3 billion. We estimated the fair value of Ally Financial common stock using a market approach that applied the average price to tangible book value multiples of comparable companies to the consolidated Ally Financial tangible book value. The significant inputs used in our fair value analyses included Ally Financial's financial statements, financial statements and price to tangible book value multiples of comparable companies in the banking and finance industry and the effects of certain Ally Financial shareholder rights. The inputs used in the measurement of the fair value are Level 3 inputs. In December 2013 we sold our investment through a private offering for net proceeds of $880 million and recorded a gain of $483 million in Interest income and other non-operating income, net.

Ally Financial Preferred Stock

94
81



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



In March 2011 our investment in Ally Financial preferred stock was sold through a public offering for net proceeds of $1.0 billion. The gain of $339 million related to the sale was recorded in Interest income and other non-operating income, net.

Note 13.Accrued Liabilities, Other Liabilities and Deferred Income Taxes

The following table summarizes the components of Accruedactivity for product warranty and related liabilities which include policy, product warranty, recall campaigns and Other liabilities and deferred income taxescourtesy transportation (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Current   
Dealer and customer allowances, claims and discounts$7,919
 $7,722
Deposits primarily from rental car companies4,713
 4,250
Deferred revenue1,276
 1,326
Policy, product warranty and recall campaigns2,559
 2,919
Payrolls and employee benefits excluding postemployment benefits2,285
 2,144
Other5,881
 4,947
Total accrued liabilities$24,633
 $23,308
Non-current   
Deferred revenue$1,249
 $1,169
Policy, product warranty and recall campaigns4,655
 4,285
Employee benefits excluding postemployment benefits1,192
 1,359
Postemployment benefits including facility idling reserves1,216
 1,518
Other5,041
 4,838
Total other liabilities and deferred income taxes$13,353
 $13,169
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Beginning balance$7,601
 $7,633
 $7,031
Warranties issued and assumed in period - recall campaigns and courtesy transportation2,910
 640
 775
Warranties issued and assumed in period - policy and warranty2,540
 2,757
 2,840
Payments(4,326) (3,240) (3,575)
Adjustments to pre-existing warranties1,187
 49
 504
Effect of foreign currency and other(266) (238) 58
Ending balance$9,646
 $7,601
 $7,633

The following table summarizes activity for policy, product warranty andIn the year ended December 31, 2014 we recorded charges of approximately $2.9 billion in Automotive cost of sales relating to recall campaigns (dollarsand courtesy transportation, of which over 86% was recorded in millions):GMNA. The recorded charges primarily comprised: (1) approximately $680 million for 2.6 million vehicles to repair ignition switches that could result in a loss of electrical power under certain circumstances that may prevent front airbags from deploying in the event of a crash (accident victims who died or suffered physical injury associated with these vehicles (or their families) may be eligible to participate in a compensation program, as more fully described in Note 17); to fix ignition lock cylinders that could allow removal of the ignition key while the engine is running, leading to possible rollaway or crash; and to provide courtesy transportation to owners of affected vehicles; partially offset by adjustments of approximately $95 million for courtesy transportation as a result of greater part availability and fewer customers utilizing courtesy transportation than originally estimated and approximately $80 million for costs originally estimated separately for ignition switches and ignition lock cylinders that are now being shipped and repaired at the same time resulting in reduced costs; (2) approximately $340 million for 1.9 million vehicles to replace either the power steering motor, the steering column, the power steering motor control unit or a combination of the steering column and the power steering motor control unit as the electric power steering could fail under certain circumstances; (3) approximately $185 million for 1.3 million vehicles prone to non-deployment of the side impact restraints if vehicles are not serviced when the Service Air Bag warning light is illuminated; (4) approximately $90 million for 2.7 million vehicles to modify the brake lamp wiring harness that could have corrosion develop due to micro-vibration; (5) approximately $80 million for 1.5 million vehicles to replace front safety lap belt cables that could fatigue and separate over time; (6) approximately $150 million for 1.4 million vehicles to replace the shift cable that could wear out over time resulting in mismatches of the gear position indicated by the shift lever; (7) approximately $325 million for 12.1 million vehicles to rework or replace ignition keys because the ignition switch may move out of the “run” position which may impact power steering and power braking and, depending on the timing of the key movement relative to the activation of the sensing algorithm of a crash event, may result in airbags not deploying; and (8) approximately $520 million for 5.2 million vehicles for other matters.

 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Beginning balance$7,204
 $6,600
 $6,789
Warranties issued and assumed in period3,181
 3,394
 3,062
Payments(3,063) (3,393) (3,740)
Adjustments to pre-existing warranties123
 539
 565
Effect of foreign currency and other(231) 64
 (76)
Ending balance$7,214
 $7,204
 $6,600
We have historically accrued estimated costs related to recall campaigns in GMNA when they are probable and reasonably estimable, which typically occurs once it is determined a specific recall campaign is needed and announced. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, following the significant increase in the number of vehicles subject to recall in GMNA, the results of our ongoing comprehensive safety review, additional engineering analysis, the creation of a new Global Product Integrity organization, the appointment of a new Global Vice President of Vehicle Safety responsible for the safety development of our vehicle systems and our overall commitment to customer satisfaction, we accumulated sufficient historical data in GMNA to support the use of an actuarial-based estimation technique for recall campaigns. As such, we now accrue at the time of vehicle sale in GMNA the costs for recall campaigns. Based on the expanded historical data, we recorded a catch-up adjustment of $874 million to adjust the estimate for recall costs for previously sold vehicles, which is included in Adjustments to pre-existing warranties in the three months ended June 30, 2014. The estimation technique for recall campaigns takes into account our historical experience, including incident rates of recall campaigns. In the six months ended December 31, 2014 we announced 23 recalls covering approximately 8.1 million vehicles related to safety, customer satisfaction and other matters. The costs for these recalls are comprehended in the catch-up adjustment and also resulted in additional adjustment of approximately $200 million.

Note 14. Short-Term and Long-Term Debt

Automotive

The following table summarizes the components of our short-term debt and long-term debt (dollars in millions):

95
82



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



The following table summarizes the components of our short-term and long-term debt (dollars in millions):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Secured debt$320
 $1,182
Unsecured debt   
Senior unsecured notes4,500
 
Canadian Health Care Trust (HCT) notes
 1,239
Other unsecured debt1,352
 1,713
Total unsecured debt5,852
 2,952
Capital leases965
 1,038
Total automotive debt(a)7,137
 5,172
Less: short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt564
 1,748
Total long-term debt$6,573
 $3,424
    
Fair value of automotive debt(b)$6,837
 $5,298
    
Available under credit facility agreements$10,404
 $11,119
Interest rate range on outstanding debt(c)0.0-19.0%
 0.0-19.0%
Weighted-average interest rate on outstanding short-term debt(c)9.0% 3.7%
Weighted-average interest rate on outstanding long-term debt(c)3.8% 4.0%
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Secured debt$237
 $320
Unsecured debt8,205
 5,852
Capital leases968
 965
Total automotive debt(a)$9,410
 $7,137
    
Fair value of automotive debt$9,799
 $6,837
Available under credit facility agreements$12,026
 $10,404
Interest rate range on outstanding debt(b)0.0-18.0%
 0.0-19.0%
Weighted-average interest rate on outstanding short-term debt(b)6.4% 9.0%
Weighted-average interest rate on outstanding long-term debt(b)4.3% 3.8%
__________
(a)
Net of a $681 million and $765 million and $1.1 billion net discount at December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.
(b)
The fair value of debt includes $6.8 billion and $4.1 billion measured utilizing Level 2 inputs at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and $1.2 billion measured utilizing Level 3 inputs at December 31, 2012.
(c)Includes coupon rates on debt denominated in various foreign currencies and interest free loans.

The fair value of debt includes $7.6 billion measured utilizing Level 1 inputs at December 31, 2014 and $2.2 billion and $6.8 billion measured utilizing Level 2 inputs at December 31, 2014 and 2013. The fair value measurements utilizeof debt measured utilizing Level 1 inputs was based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments that a market participant can access at the measurement date. The fair value of debt measured utilizing Level 2 inputs was based on quoted market prices in inactive markets for identical instruments and if unavailable, a discounted cash flow model. The valuation is reviewed internally by personnel with appropriate expertise in valuation methodologies. This model utilizes observable inputs such as contractual repayment terms and benchmark yield curves, plus a spread based on our senior unsecured notes that is intended to represent our nonperformance risk for secured or unsecured obligations.risk. We estimate our nonperformance risk using our corporate credit rating, the ratings on our senior unsecured notes and on our secured revolver, yields on traded bonds of companies with comparable credit ratings and risk profiles. We acquireobtain the benchmark yield curves and nonperformance risk spreadyields on unsecured notes from independent sources that are widely used in the financial industry. In certain circumstances we adjust the valuation of debt for additional nonperformance risk or potential prepayment probability scenarios. We may use a probability weighting of prepayment scenarios when the stated rate exceeds market rates and the instrument contains prepayment features. The prepayment scenarios are adjusted to reflect the views of market participants. The fair value measurements subject to additional adjustments for nonperformance risk or prepayment have been categorized in Level 3.
Secured Debt

Wholesale financing represents arrangements, primarily with Ally Financial, where cash is received in advance of the final sale of vehicles, parts and accessories to our dealers or ultimate consumer. These obligations typically settle through the sale and delivery of our products and generally do not require cash outflows to settle. Following GM Financial's acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations in April 2013, most of the wholesale financing balance classified as debt became intercompany debt and was eliminated in consolidation, resulting in a decrease to our automotive debt balance of $682 million.

Secured Revolving Credit Facilities

In November 2012 we entered into two new securedWe received an investment grade corporate rating from Moody's in September 2013 and from S&P in September 2014 which allowed the release of the collateral securing our $11.0 billion revolving credit facilities with anunder their terms.

In October 2014 we amended our two primary revolving credit facilities, increasing our aggregate borrowing capacity offrom $11.0 billion to $12.5 billion. These facilities consist of a three-year, $5.5$5.0 billion facility and a five-year, $5.5$7.5 billion facility and replaced our previous five-year, $5.0 billion secured revolving credit facility. Availability under the secured revolving creditBoth facilities is subject to borrowing base restrictions.

The three-year, $5.5 billion facility isare available to GM Financialthe Company as well as certain wholly-owned domestic and international subsidiaries.subsidiaries, including GM Financial. The facility includes various sub-limits including a GM Financial borrowing sub-limit of $4.0 billion, a multi-currency

96



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


borrowing sub-limit of $3.5 billion, a Brazilian Real borrowing sub-limit of approximately $485 million and a letter of credit sub-facility limit of $1.5 billion. We had amounts in use under the letter of credit sub-facility of $625 million at December 31, 2013.

The five-year, $5.5three-year, $5.0 billion facility allows for borrowings in U.S. Dollars and other currencies and includes a GM Financial borrowing sub-limit of $2.0 billion, a letter of credit sub-facility of $1.6 billion and a Brazilian Real sub-facility of $305 million. The five-year, $7.5 billion facility allows for borrowings in U.S. Dollars and other currencies and includes a GM Financial borrowing sub-limit of $2.0 billion, a letter of credit sub-limit of $500 million and a Brazilian Real sub-facility of $195 million. This facility is not available to GM Financial.

Our obligations under the securedThe revolving credit facilities contain representations, warranties and covenants that are guaranteedtypical for these types of facilities. The facilities also require us to maintain at least $4.0 billion in global liquidity and at least $2.0 billion in U.S. liquidity and to guarantee any borrowings by certain of our domestic subsidiaries and by a substantial portion of our domestic assets including accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, intellectual property and trademarks, equity interests in certain of our direct domestic subsidiaries as well as up to 65% of the voting equity interests in certain of our direct foreign subsidiaries, in each case, subject to certain exceptions. The collateral securing the secured revolving credit facilities does not include, among other assets, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as well as our investments in GM Financial, GM Korea and in our China JVs.subsidiaries. If we receive andfail to maintain an investment grade corporate rating from two or more of the following credit rating agencies: Fitch, Ratings, Moody's Investor Service and Standard & Poor's,S&P, we will no longer havebe required to post collateral or provide guarantees from certain domestic subsidiaries under the terms of the facilities.

The secured revolving credit facilities contain representations, warranties and covenants customary of these types of facilities, including negative covenants restricting incurring liens, consummating mergers or sales of assets and incurring secured indebtedness, and restricting us from making restricted payments, in each case, subject to exceptions and limitations. These restricted payments include limitations on the amount of dividend payments and repurchases of our common stock. These restrictions can be mitigated based on various factors including but not limited to cash flows generated from operating and investing activities, prior restricted payments, our borrowing base coverage ratio, consolidated global liquidity and other provisions. The facilities also require us to maintain at least $4.0 billion in consolidated global liquidity and at least $2.0 billion in consolidated U.S. liquidity.

Interest rates on obligations under the secured revolving credit facilities are based on prevailing per annumannual interest rates for Eurodollar loans or an alternative base rate, plus an applicable margin, in each case, based upon the credit rating assigned to the secured revolving credit facilities or our corporate rating depending on certain criteria.

Unsecured Debtmargin.

Senior Unsecured Notes

In November 2014 we issued $2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes comprising $500 million of 4.0% notes due in 2025, $750 million of 5.0% notes due in 2035 and $1.25 billion of 5.2% notes due in 2045. In September 2013 we issued $4.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes comprising $1.5 billion of 3.5% notes due in 2018, $1.5 billion of 4.875% notes due in 2023 and $1.5 billion of 6.25% notes due in 2043. These notes contain terms and covenants customary of these types of securities including limitations on the amount of thecertain secured debt we may issue.

In connection with the issuance of these notes we entered into a registration rights agreement that requires us to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for an exchange offer with respect to the senior notes. If the registration statement has not been declared effective by the SEC within 365 days after the closing date of the debt issuance, if we fail to consummate the exchange offer within 30 business days after such target effective date or if the registration statement ceases to remain effective, we will be required to pay additional interest of 0.25% per annum for the first 90 day period following such event and an additional 0.25% per annum for each subsequent 90 day period prior to the consummation of the exchange offer up to a maximum additional interest rate of 0.5% per annum.

HCT Notes

As part of the establishment of the HCT to provide retiree healthcare benefits to certain active and retired employees in Canada, we issued notes to the HCT with a fair value of $1.1 billion in October 2011. We recorded a premium of $42 million at issuance. The notes accrued interest at an annual rate of 7.0%. The notes were due in periodic installments through 2018. In October 2013 we prepaid the HCT notes in full for $1.2 billion. Refer to Note 15 for additional information on the HCT settlement.

GM Korea Preferred Shares

Prior to April 2013 GM Korea had outstanding non-convertible mandatorily redeemable preferred shares. Dividends accrued at a rate of 2.5% through October 2012 and increased to 7.0% through 2017. In December 2012 GM Korea made a payment of $671 million to redeem early a portion of shares that had a carrying amount of $429 million and the difference was recorded as a

97
83



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


loss on extinguishment of debt. In April 2013 GM Korea made a payment of $708 million to redeem early the remaining balance of the shares that had a carrying amount of $468 million and the difference was recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt.

Gains (Losses) on Extinguishment of Debt

In the year ended December 31, 2014 we prepaid and retired debt obligations with a total carrying amount of $325 million and recorded a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $202 million which primarily represented unsecured debt in Brazil. In the year ended December 31, 2013 we prepaid and retired debt obligations with a total carrying amount of $1.8 billion and recorded a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $212 million which primarily represented the unamortized debt discount on the GM Korea mandatorily redeemable preferred shares. In the year ended December 31, 2012 we prepaid and retired debt obligations with a total carrying amount of $514 million and recorded a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $250 million which primarily represented the unamortized debt discount on the GM Korea mandatorily redeemable preferred shares.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial

The following table summarizes the carrying amount and fair value of debt (dollars in millions):
  December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
  Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value
Secured debt $25,214
 $25,228
 $22,073
 $22,170
Unsecured debt 12,217
 12,479
 6,973
 7,078
Total GM Financial debt $37,431
 $37,707
 $29,046
 $29,248

The fair value of debt includes $32.8 billion and $23.0 billion measured utilizing Level 2 inputs and $4.9 billion and $6.2 billion measured utilizing Level 3 inputs at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The fair value of debt measured utilizing Level 2 inputs was based on quoted market prices and if unavailable, quoted market prices of similar securities. For debt that has terms of one year or less or has been priced within the last six months, the carrying amount or par value is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value. The fair value of debt measured utilizing Level 3 inputs was based on the discounted future net cash flows expected to be settled using current risk-adjusted rates.

Secured Debt

Most of the secured debt was issued by VIEs and is repayable only from proceeds related to the underlying pledged finance receivables and leases. Refer to Note 12 for additional information relating to GM Financial's involvement with VIEs. Secured debt consists of revolving credit facilities and securitization notes payable. Weighted-average interest rates are both fixed and variable, ranging from 0.35% to 13.43% at December 31, 2014.

The revolving credit facilities are expected to be repaid over periods ranging up to five years. At the end of the revolving period, if not renewed, the debt will amortize over a defined period. GM Financial is required to hold certain funds in restricted cash accounts to provide additional collateral for borrowings under certain secured credit facilities. In the year ended December 31, 2011 we prepaid2014 GM Financial entered into new or renewed credit facilities with a total additional borrowing capacity of $5.5 billion.

Securitization notes payable at December 31, 2014 are due beginning in 2016 through 2022. In the year ended December 31, 2014 GM Financial issued securitization notes payable of $10.7 billion with a weighted-average interest rate of 1.4% maturing on various dates through 2022.

Unsecured Debt

Unsecured debt consists of senior notes, credit facilities and retiredother unsecured debt. Senior notes outstanding at December 31, 2014 are due beginning in full debt facilities2016 through 2023 and have interest rates that range from 1.875% to 6.75%. In May 2014 GM Financial issued CAD 400 million of 3.25% senior notes which are due in May 2017. In July 2014 GM Financial issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior notes comprising $700 million of 2.625% notes due in July 2017 and $800 million of 3.5% notes due in July 2019. In September 2014 GM Financial issued $2.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior notes comprising $750 million of 3.0% notes due in September 2017 and $1.25 billion of 4.375% notes due in September 2021. In October 2014 GM Financial issued Euro 500 million of 1.875% term notes which are due in October 2019. The notes are guaranteed by GM Financial's principal operating subsidiary.

84



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



In January 2015 GM Financial issued $2.25 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior notes comprising $1.0 billion heldof 3.15% notes due in January 2020, $1.0 billion of 4.0% notes due in January 2025 and $250 million of floating rate notes due in January 2020. Interest rates on the floating rate notes are equal to three-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The notes are guaranteed by certainGM Financial's principal operating subsidiary.

The terms of our subsidiaries, primarilyadvances on revolving credit facilities and other unsecured debt have remaining maturities of up to five years. Interest rates on credit facilities and other unsecured debt ranged from 0.98% to 13.35% at December 31, 2014.

Consolidated

Interest Expense

The following table summarizes interest expense (dollars in GMNA and GMSA, and recorded a gainmillions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Automotive$403
 $334
 $489
Automotive Financing - GM Financial1,426
 715
 283
Total interest expense$1,829
 $1,049
 $772

Debt Maturities

The following table summarizes contractual maturities including capital leases at December 31, 2014 (dollars in millions):
 Automotive Automotive Financing(a) Total
2015$503
 $14,491
 $14,994
2016174
 9,177
 9,351
2017511
 7,255
 7,766
20181,600
 2,666
 4,266
2019109
 1,860
 1,969
Thereafter7,194
 2,000
 9,194
 $10,091
 $37,449
 $47,540
________
(a)Secured debt, credit facilities and other unsecured debt are based on expected payoff date. Senior notes principal amounts are based on maturity.

At December 31, 2014 future interest payments on these debt facilities of $18automotive capital lease obligations were $488 million. GM Financial had no capital lease obligations at December 31, 2014.

Technical Defaults and Covenant ViolationsCompliance with Debt Covenants

Several of our loan facilities, including our secured revolving credit facilities, require compliance with certain financial and operational covenants as well as regular reporting to lenders, including providing certain subsidiary financial statements. Some of GM Financial’s secured and unsecured debt agreements also contain various covenants, including maintaining minimum financial ratios, asset quality and portfolio performance ratios as well as limits on deferment levels. Failure to meet certain of these requirements may result in a covenant violation or an event of default depending on the terms of the agreement. An event of default may allow lenders to declare amounts outstanding under these agreements immediately due and payable, to enforce their interests against collateral pledged under these agreements or restrict our ability or GM Financial's ability to obtain additional borrowings. A foreign subsidiary was not in compliance with certain financial covenants under its $77 million term loan facility. We are evaluating alternatives to cure this financialNo technical defaults or covenant issue and included this liability in Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial

The following table summarizes the carrying amount and fair value of debt (dollars in millions):
  December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
  Carrying Amount Fair Value(a) Carrying Amount Fair Value(a)
Secured        
Revolving credit facilities $9,000
 $8,995
 $354
 $354
Securitization notes payable(b) 13,073
 13,175
 9,024
 9,171
Total secured 22,073
 22,170
 9,378
 9,525
Unsecured        
Senior notes 4,000
 4,106
 1,500
 1,620
Bank lines and other unsecured debt 2,973
 2,972
 
 
Total unsecured 6,973
 7,078
 1,500
 1,620
Total GM Financial debt $29,046
 $29,248
 $10,878
 $11,145
_______
(a)The fair value of debt includes $23.0 billion and $11.1 billion measured utilizing Level 2 inputs at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and $6.2 billion measured utilizing Level 3 inputs at December 31, 2013. For revolving credit facilities with variable interest rates and maturities of one year or less, the carrying amount is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value. The fair value of other secured debt and the unsecured debt is based on quoted market prices, when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the market value is estimated by discounting future net cash flows expected to be paid using current risk-adjusted rates.
(b)Includes a private securitization that GM Financial used observable and unobservable inputs to estimate fair value. Unobservable inputs are related to the structuring of the debt into various classes, which is based on public securitizations issued during the same time frame. Observable inputs are used by obtaining active prices based on the securitization debt issued during the same time frame. These observable inputs are then used to create expected market prices (unobservable inputs), which are then applied to the debt classes in order to estimate fair value which would approximate market value.
Secured

Revolving Credit Facilities

98



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



The revolving credit facilities have revolving periods ranging from one to three years. At the end of the revolving period, if the facilities are not renewed, the debt will amortize over periods ranging up to six years. Most of the secured debt was issued by VIEs and it is repayable only from proceeds related to the underlying pledged finance receivables and leases. Refer to Note 12 for additional information relating to GM Financial's involvement with VIEs. Weighted-average interest rates are both fixed and variable, ranging from 0.9% to 15.9%violations existed at December 31, 2013.

GM Financial is required to hold certain funds in restricted cash accounts to provide additional collateral for borrowings under certain secured credit facilities. Additionally, some of GM Financial’s secured credit facilities contain various covenants requiring minimum financial ratios, asset quality and portfolio performance ratios (portfolio net loss and delinquency ratios and pool level cumulative net loss ratios) as well as limits on deferment levels. Failure to meet any of these covenants could result in an event of default under these agreements. If an event of default occurs under these agreements the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under these agreements to be immediately due and payable, enforce their interests against collateral pledged under these agreements, restrict GM Financial’s ability to obtain additional borrowings under these agreements and/or remove GM Financial as servicer. At December 31, 2013 GM Financial was in compliance with all covenants related to its credit facilities.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 GM Financial entered into two new credit facilities with a total borrowing capacity of $1.3 billion. At December 31, 2013 revolving credit facilities of $7.3 billion resulted from the acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations.

Securitization Notes Payable

Securitization notes payable represents debt issued by GM Financial through securitization transactions. Debt issuance costs are amortized over the expected term of the securitizations on an effective yield basis. As a result of GM Financial's acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations, GM Financial recorded a purchase accounting discount of $69 million that will amortize to interest expense over the expected term of the notes. At December 31, 2013 the remaining purchase accounting discount of $47 million is included in Total secured debt.
At the time of securitization of finance receivables, GM Financial is required to pledge assets equal to a specified percentage of the securitization pool to support the securitization transaction. The assets pledged consist of cash deposited to a restricted account and additional receivables delivered to the trust, which create overcollateralization. The securitization transactions require the percentage of assets pledged to support the transaction to increase until a specified level is attained. Excess cash flows generated by the trusts are added to the restricted cash account or used to pay down outstanding debt in the trusts, creating overcollateralization until the targeted percentage level of assets is reached. Once the targeted percentage level of assets is reached and maintained, excess cash flows generated by the trusts are released to GM Financial as distributions from trusts. As the balance of the securitization pool declines, the amount of pledged assets needed to maintain the required percentage level is reduced. Assets in excess of the required percentage are also released to GM Financial as distributions from trusts.

In the year ended December 31, 2013 GM Financial issued securitization notes payable of $6.8 billion with a weighted-average interest rate of 1.7% maturing on various dates through 2021. At December 31, 2013 securitization notes payable of $2.3 billion resulted from the acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations.

Unsecured

Senior Notes

In May 2013 GM Financial issued $2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior notes due in 2016 through 2023 with interest rates that range from 2.75% to 4.25%. In August 2012 GM Financial issued 4.75% senior notes of $1.0 billion which are due in August 2017 with interest payable semiannually. Senior notes outstanding at December 31, 2013 are due beginning in 2016 through 2023 and have interest rates that range from 2.75% to 6.75%. The notes are guaranteed by GM Financial's principal operating subsidiary.

Bank Lines and Other Unsecured Debt


99



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


The maturity dates of bank lines and other unsecured debt, which was assumed in the acquisition of the Ally Financial international operations, range up to five years. If not renewed, any balance outstanding under these bank lines is either immediately due in full or will amortize over a defined period. Interest rates on bank lines and other unsecured debt ranged from 1.1% to 12.9% at December 31, 2013.

Consolidated

Interest Expense

The following table summarizes interest expense (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Automotive$334
 $489
 $540
Automotive Financing - GM Financial715
 283
 204
Total interest expense$1,049
 $772
 $744

Debt Maturities

The following table summarizes contractual maturities including capital leases at December 31, 2013 (dollars in millions):
 Automotive Automotive Financing(a) Total
2014$543
 $13,594
 $14,137
2015147
 6,473
 6,620
2016109
 4,199
 4,308
2017496
 2,337
 2,833
20181,582
 1,693
 3,275
Thereafter5,025
 750
 5,775
 $7,902
 $29,046
 $36,948
________
(a)Secured debt, bank lines and other unsecured debt are based on expected payoff date. Senior notes principal amounts are based on maturity.

At December 31, 2013 future interest payments on automotive capital lease obligations were $578 million. GM Financial had no capital lease obligations at December 31, 2013.2014.

Note 15. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits


85



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Defined benefit pension plans covering eligible U.S. hourly employees (hired prior to October 2007) and Canadian hourly employees generally provide benefits of negotiated, stated amounts for each year of service and supplemental benefits for employees who retire with 30 years of service before normal retirement age. The benefits provided by the defined benefit pension plans covering eligible U.S. (hired prior to January 1, 2001) and Canadian salaried employees and employees in certain other non-U.S. locations are generally based on years of service and compensation history. Accrual of defined pension benefits ceased on September 30, 2012 for U.S. salaried employees and on December 31, 2012 for Canadian salaried employees. There is also an unfunded nonqualified pension plan covering primarily U.S. executives for service prior to January 1, 2007 and it is based on an “excess plan” for service after that date.

Pension Contributions


100



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


The funding policy for qualified defined benefit pension plans is to contribute annually not less than the minimum required by applicable law and regulations or to directly pay benefit payments where appropriate. At December 31, 20132014 all legal funding requirements had been met. We expect to contribute $100$70 million to our U.S. non-qualified plans and $749 million$1.1 billion to our non-U.S. pension plans in 2014.2015. The following table summarizes contributions made to the defined benefit pension plans (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
U.S. hourly and salaried$128
 $2,420
 $1,962
Non-U.S.886
 855
 836
Total$1,014
 $3,275
 $2,798

We made a voluntary contribution in January 2011 to our U.S. hourly and salaried defined benefit pension plans of 61 million shares of our common stock valued at $2.2 billion for funding purposes at the time of contribution. The contributed shares qualified as a plan asset for funding purposes at the time of contribution and as a plan asset valued at $1.9 billion for accounting purposes in July 2011. This was a voluntary contribution above our funding requirements for the pension plans.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
U.S. hourly and salaried$143
 $128
 $2,420
Non-U.S.770
 886
 855
Total$913
 $1,014
 $3,275

We continue to pursue various options to fund and derisk our pension plans, including continued changes to the pension asset portfolio mix to reduce funded status volatility.

Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

Certain hourly and salaried defined benefit plans provide postretirement medical, dental, legal service and life insurance to eligible U.S. and Canadian retirees and their eligible dependents. Certain other non-U.S. subsidiaries have postretirement benefit plans, although most non-U.S. employees are covered by government sponsored or administered programs.

OPEB Contributions

The following table summarizes contributions to the U.S. OPEB plans (dollars in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Employer contributions$393
 $432
 $426
Plan participants' contributions29
 4
 13
Total contributions$422
 $436
 $439

For the year ended December 31, 2011 we also contributed $1.9 billion to the independent HCT consisting of restricted cash of $782 million and notes payable of $1.1 billion.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Employer contributions$354
 $393
 $432
Plan participants' contributions22
 29
 4
Total contributions$376
 $422
 $436

Defined Contribution Plans

We have a defined contribution planplans for eligible U.S. salaried employees. This plan providesand hourly employees that provide discretionary matching contributions which we instituted in October 2009. U.S. hourly employees hired after September 2007 also participate in a defined contribution plan.contributions. Contributions are also made to certain non-U.S. defined contribution plans. We made contributions to our defined contribution plans of $513 million, $502 million $352 million and $297$352 million in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.2012.

Significant Plan Amendments, Benefit Modifications and Related Events

U.S. Salaried Defined Benefit Life Insurance Plan

In September 2013 we amended the U.S. salaried life insurance plan effective January 1, 2014 to eliminate benefits for retirees and eligible employees retiring on or after August 1, 2009. The remeasurement, settlement and curtailment resulted in a decrease

86



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


in the OPEB liability of $319 million, a decrease in the net pre-tax actuarial loss component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss of $236 million and a pre-tax gain of $83 million.

101



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



U.S. Salaried Defined Benefit Pension Plan

In the year ended December 31, 2012 we amended the salaried pension plan to cease the accrual of additional benefits effective September 30, 2012 resulting in a curtailment of $309 million which decreased the pension liability. We divided the plan to create a new legally separate defined benefit plan primarily for active and terminated vested participants. Settlement payments of $30.6 billion were made consisting of lump-sum pension distributions of $3.6 billion to retired salaried plan participants, group annuity contracts purchased for a total annuity premium of $25.1 billion and two separate previously guaranteed obligations of $1.9 billion were settled. These agreements unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee the full payment of all annuity payments to the participants that were receiving payments from the plan and the insurance companies assumed all investment risk associated with the assets that were delivered as the annuity contract premiums.

Through these transactions we have settled certain pension obligations in their entirety resulting in a pre-tax settlement loss of $2.6 billion ($2.2 billion after tax) in Automotive cost of sales. The pre-tax loss is composed of existing losses in Accumulated other comprehensive loss of $377 million, and the premium paid to the insurance company of $2.1 billion. The tax benefit of $413 million is composed of the statutory tax benefit of $1.0 billion offset by tax expense of $596 million primarily associated with the removal of prior period income tax allocations between Accumulated other comprehensive loss and Income tax expense (benefit).

In the year ended December 31, 2012 we provided short-term, interest-free, unsecured loans of $2.2 billion to provide the plan with incremental liquidity to pay ongoing benefits and administrative costs. ContributionsThrough December 31, 2013 contributions of $1.7$1.7 billion were made from the $2.2$2.2 billion loans. Through December 31, 2012 $430 million was repaid and $90 million of the loan was still outstanding. In the year ended December 31, 2013 $60 million was repaid loans and the remaining $30 million was deemed a plan contribution.amounts were repaid.

Active salaried plan participants began receiving additional contributions in the defined contribution plan in October 2012. Lump-sum pension distributions in 2013 of $430 million resulted in a pre-tax settlement gain of $128 million

Canadian Salaried Defined Benefit Plans

In June 2012 we amended the Canadian salaried pension plan to cease the accrual of additional benefits effective December 31, 2012 and provide active employees a lump-sum distribution option at retirement. The remeasurement, amendments and offsetting curtailment increased the pension liability by $84 million. Active plan participants started receiving additional contributions in the defined contribution plan starting in January 2013.

We also amended the Canadian salaried retiree healthcare plan to eliminate post-65 healthcare benefits for employees retiring on or after July 1, 2014. In conjunction with this change we amended the plan to offer either a monthly monetary payment or an annual lump-sum cash payment to a defined contribution plan for health care in lieu of the benefit coverage provisions formerly provided under the healthcare plan. These amendments decreased the OPEB liability by $28 million.

Canadian HCT

In October 2011 pursuant to a June 2009 agreement between General Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) and the CAW an independent HCT was implemented to provide retiree healthcare benefits to certain active and retired employees. Concurrent with the implementation of the HCT, GMCL was legally released from all obligations associated with the cost of providing retiree healthcare benefits to CAW retirees and surviving spouses by the class action process and to CAW active employees as of June 8, 2009. We accounted for the related termination of CAW hourly retiree healthcare benefits as a settlement and recorded a gain of $749 million in Automotive cost of sales. The settlement gain represents the difference between the healthcare plan obligation of $3.1 billion (as of the implementation date) and the fair value of the notes and restricted cash contributed totaling $1.9 billion, and recognition of Accumulated other comprehensive loss of $414 million.

Other Remeasurements

In March 2012 certainthe three months ended December 31, 2014 the SOA issued new mortality and mortality improvement tables that raise life expectancies and thereby indicate the amount of estimated aggregate benefit payments to our U.S. pension plans in GME were remeasured as partplans' participants is increasing. We have incorporated the new SOA mortality and mortality improvement tables into our December 31, 2014 measurement of our goodwill impairment testing, resultingU.S. pension plans' benefit obligations. The change in an increasethese assumptions had the effect of $150 million inincreasing the December 31, 2014 U.S. pension liability and a pre-tax increase in the net actuarial loss component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss.plans' obligations by $2.2 billion.


102



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


In September 2011 a plan which provided legal services to U.S. hourly employees and retirees was remeasured as a result of our labor agreement provisions which terminated the plan effective December 31, 2013. The negotiated termination has been accounted for as a negative plan amendment resulting in a decrease in the OPEB liability and a pre-tax increase of $266$266 million in the prior service credit component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss was amortized through December 31, 2013.

In March 20112012 certain pension plans in GME were remeasured as part of our goodwill impairment testing, resulting in a decreasean increase of $272150 million in the pension liability and a pre-tax increase in the net actuarial gainloss component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Refer to Note 10 for additional information on our Goodwill impairment.

Pension and OPEB Obligations and Plan Assets

The following table summarizes the change in benefit obligations and related plan assets (dollars in millions):

103
87



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Year Ended December 31, 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2012Year Ended December 31, 2014 Year Ended December 31, 2013
Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other BenefitsPension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. PlansU.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
Change in benefit obligations                              
Beginning benefit obligation$82,110
 $29,301
 $6,271
 $1,528
 $108,562
 $25,765
 $5,822
 $1,490
$71,480
 $27,528
 $5,110
 $1,238
 $82,110
 $29,301
 $6,271
 $1,528
Service cost298
 394
 24
 13
 452
 383
 23
 16
247
 358
 13
 10
 298
 394
 24
 13
Interest cost2,837
 1,010
 217
 57
 4,055
 1,110
 234
 63
3,060
 1,031
 218
 55
 2,837
 1,010
 217
 57
Plan participants' contributions
 4
 29
 2
 
 7
 4
 1
Amendments
 (4) 
 (4) (32) 139
 
 (52)
 17
 
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Actuarial (gains) losses(7,661) (1,009) (757) (210) 8,432
 2,774
 622
 13
7,770
 3,179
 331
 117
 (7,661) (1,009) (757) (210)
Benefits paid(5,719) (1,683) (422) (53) (8,422) (1,551) (436) (55)(5,779) (1,699) (376) (50) (5,719) (1,683) (422) (53)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 (528) 
 (98) 
 682
 
 30

 (2,536) 
 (108) 
 (528) 
 (98)
Business combinations
 128
 
 
 
 
 
 
Curtailments, settlements and other(385) (85) (252) 3
 (30,937) (8) 2
 22
(54) 19
 (7) 74
 (385) 47
 (223) 5
Ending benefit obligation71,480
 27,528
 5,110
 1,238
 82,110
 29,301
 6,271
 1,528
76,724
 27,897
 5,289
 1,336
 71,480
 27,528
 5,110
 1,238
Change in plan assets                              
Beginning fair value of plan assets68,085
 15,541
 
 
 94,349
 14,541
 
 
64,166
 14,986
 
 
 68,085
 15,541
 
 
Actual return on plan assets2,107
 988
 
 
 10,332
 1,344
 
 
7,346
 1,893
 
 
 2,107
 988
 
 
Employer contributions128
 886
 393
 51
 2,420
 855
 432
 54
143
 770
 354
 48
 128
 886
 393
 51
Plan participants' contributions
 4
 29
 2
 
 7
 4
 1
Benefits paid(5,719) (1,683) (422) (53) (8,422) (1,551) (436) (55)(5,779) (1,699) (376) (50) (5,719) (1,683) (422) (53)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 (692) 
 
 
 389
 
 

 (1,232) 
 
 
 (692) 
 
Business combinations
 26
 
 
 
 
 
 
Settlements(435) (87) 
 
 (30,629) (207) 
 
Other
 3
 
 
 35
 163
 
 
Settlements and other(53) (49) 22
 2
 (435) (54) 29
 2
Ending fair value of plan assets64,166
 14,986
 
 
 68,085
 15,541
 
 
65,823
 14,669
 
 
 64,166
 14,986
 
 
Ending funded status$(7,314) $(12,542) $(5,110) $(1,238) $(14,025) $(13,760) $(6,271) $(1,528)$(10,901) $(13,228) $(5,289) $(1,336) $(7,314) $(12,542) $(5,110) $(1,238)
Amounts recorded in the consolidated balance sheets                              
Non-current assets$
 $137
 $
 $
 $
 $73
 $
 $
$
 $111
 $
 $
 $
 $137
 $
 $
Current liabilities(131) (379) (368) (83) (95) (343) (406) (84)(69) (383) (338) (58) (131) (379) (368) (83)
Non-current liabilities(7,183) (12,300) (4,742) (1,155) (13,930) (13,490) (5,865) (1,444)(10,832) (12,956) (4,951) (1,278) (7,183) (12,300) (4,742) (1,155)
Net amount recorded$(7,314) $(12,542) $(5,110) $(1,238) $(14,025) $(13,760) $(6,271) $(1,528)$(10,901) $(13,228) $(5,289) $(1,336) $(7,314) $(12,542) $(5,110) $(1,238)
Amounts recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss                              
Net actuarial gain (loss)$4,747
 $(3,379) $(542) $47
 $(1,434) $(4,786) $(1,573) $(188)$452
 $(5,019) $(859) $(83) $4,747
 $(3,379) $(542) $47
Net prior service (cost) credit38
 (87) 19
 91
 42
 (111) 135
 118
35
 (57) 16
 72
 38
 (87) 19
 91
Total recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss$4,785
 $(3,466) $(523) $138
 $(1,392) $(4,897) $(1,438) $(70)$487
 $(5,076) $(843) $(11) $4,785
 $(3,466) $(523) $138

The following table summarizes the total accumulated benefit obligations (ABO), the fair value of plan assets for defined benefit pension plans with ABO in excess of plan assets, and the projected benefit obligation (PBO) and fair value of plan assets for defined benefit pension plans with PBO in excess of plan assets (dollars in millions):


104
88



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. PlansU.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
ABO$71,461
 $27,069
 $82,103
 $28,880
$76,702
 $27,425
 $71,461
 $27,069
Plans with ABO in excess of plan assets              
ABO$71,461
 $25,897
 $82,103
 $28,156
$76,702
 $26,510
 $71,461
 $25,897
Fair value of plan assets$64,166
 $13,663
 $68,085
 $14,702
$65,823
 $13,638
 $64,166
 $13,663
Plans with PBO in excess of plan assets              
PBO$71,480
 $26,788
 $82,110
 $28,537
$76,724
 $26,935
 $71,480
 $26,788
Fair value of plan assets$64,166
 $14,109
 $68,085
 $14,704
$65,823
 $13,643
 $64,166
 $14,109

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension and OPEB expense along with the assumptions used to determine benefit obligations (dollars in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2012 Year Ended December 31, 2011Year Ended December 31, 2014 Year Ended December 31, 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2012
Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other BenefitsPension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. PlansU.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
Components of expense                                              
Service cost$395
 $425
 $24
 $13
 $590
 $411
 $23
 $16
 $632
 $399
 $23
 $30
$380
 $389
 $13
 $10
 $395
 $425
 $24
 $13
 $590
 $411
 $23
 $16
Interest cost2,837
 1,010
 217
 57
 4,055
 1,110
 234
 63
 4,915
 1,215
 265
 186
3,060
 1,031
 218
 55
 2,837
 1,010
 217
 57
 4,055
 1,110
 234
 63
Expected return on plan assets(3,562) (823) 
 
 (5,029) (870) 
 
 (6,692) (925) 
 
(3,914) (873) 
 
 (3,562) (823) 
 
 (5,029) (870) 
 
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)(4) 19
 (116) (14) (1) 1
 (116) (12) (2) (2) (39) (9)(4) 17
 (2) (14) (4) 19
 (116) (14) (1) 1
 (116) (12)
Recognized net actuarial loss6
 208
 85
 6
 2
 35
 52
 6
 
 
 6
 
(91) 154
 14
 (6) 6
 208
 85
 6
 2
 35
 52
 6
Curtailments, settlements and other (gains) losses(77) (6) (62) 
 2,580
 71
 
 11
 (23) (7) 
 (749)
Net periodic pension and OPEB expense (income)$(405) $833
 $148
 $62
 $2,197
 $758
 $193
 $84
 $(1,170) $680
 $255
 $(542)
Curtailments, settlements and other(1) 3
 
 
 (77) (6) (62) 
 2,580
 71
 
 11
Net periodic expense (income)$(570) $721
 $243
 $45
 $(405) $833
 $148
 $62
 $2,197
 $758
 $193
 $84
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations                                              
Discount rate4.46% 4.10% 4.52% 4.71% 3.59% 3.70% 3.68% 3.97% 4.15% 4.50% 4.24% 4.37%3.73% 3.14% 3.80% 3.99% 4.46% 4.10% 4.52% 4.71% 3.59% 3.70% 3.68% 3.97%
Rate of compensation increase(a)N/A
 2.90% N/A
 4.21% N/A
 2.77% 4.50% 4.21% 4.50% 3.11% 4.50% 4.20%N/A
 2.85% N/A
 4.21% N/A
 2.90% N/A
 4.21% N/A
 2.77% 4.50% 4.21%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net expense                                              
Discount rate3.59% 3.69% 3.69% 3.97% 4.06% 4.45% 4.24% 4.31% 4.96% 5.16% 5.05% 5.01%4.46% 4.10% 4.52% 4.71% 3.59% 3.69% 3.69% 3.97% 4.06% 4.45% 4.24% 4.31%
Expected rate of return on plan assets5.77% 5.70% N/A
 N/A
 6.18% 6.20% N/A
 N/A
 8.00% 6.50% N/A
 N/A
6.53% 6.28% N/A
 N/A
 5.77% 5.70% N/A
 N/A
 6.18% 6.20% N/A
 N/A
Rate of compensation increase(a)N/A
 2.77% 4.50% 4.21% 4.50% 3.15% 4.50% 4.21% 3.96% 3.25% 4.50% 4.42%N/A
 2.90% N/A
 4.21% N/A
 2.77% 4.50% 4.21% 4.50% 3.15% 4.50% 4.21%
_________
(a)As a result of ceasing the accrual of additional benefits for salaried plan participants, the rate of compensation increase does not have a significant effect on our U.S. pension and OPEB plans.

U.S. pension plan service cost includes administrative expenses of $97$133 million,, $138 $97 million and $138$138 million in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011.2012. Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net expense are determined at the beginning of the period and updated for remeasurements. Non-U.S. pension plan administrative expenses included in service cost includes administrative expenses of $31 million and $28 millionwere insignificant in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

The following table summarizes estimatedEstimated amounts to be amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in the year ending December 31, 20142015 based on December 31, 20132014 plan measurements (dollarsare $295 million, consisting primarily of amortization of the net actuarial loss in millions):the non-U.S. pension plans.
 U.S. Pension Plans Non-U.S. Pension Plans U.S. Other Benefit Plans Non-U.S. Other Benefit Plans
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)$(4) $19
 $(2) $(14)
Amortization of net actuarial (gain) loss(91) 159
 14
 (6)
 $(95) $178
 $12
 $(20)

Assumptions

105



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



Investment Strategies and Long-Term Rate of Return

Detailed periodic studies conducted by outside actuaries and an internal asset management group are used to determine the long-term strategic mix among asset classes, risk mitigation strategies and the expected long-term return on asset assumptions for the U.S. pension plans. The U.S. study includes a review of alternative asset allocation and risk mitigation strategies, anticipated future

89



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


long-term performance and risk of the individual asset classes that comprise the plans' asset mix. Similar studies are performed for the significant non-U.S. pension plans with the assistance of outside actuaries and asset managers. While the studies incorporate data from recent plan performance and historical returns, the expected long-term return on plan asset assumptions are determined based on long-term prospective rates of return.

The strategic asset mix and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each plan. Individual plans have distinct liabilities, liquidity needs and regulatory requirements. Consequently there are different investment policies set by individual plan fiduciaries. Although investment policies and risk mitigation strategies may differ among plans, each investment strategy is considered to be appropriate in the context of the specific factors affecting each plan.

In setting new strategic asset mixes, consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected mixes will effectively fund the projected pension plan liabilities, while aligning with the risk tolerance of the plans' fiduciaries. The strategic asset mixes for U.S. defined benefit pension plans are increasingly designed to satisfy the competing objectives of improving funded positions (market value of assets equal to or greater than the present value of the liabilities) and mitigating the possibility of a deterioration in funded status.

Derivatives may be used to provide cost effective solutions for rebalancing investment portfolios, increasing or decreasing exposure to various asset classes and for mitigating risks, primarily interest rate and currency risks. Equity and fixed income managers are permitted to utilize derivatives as efficient substitutes for traditional physical securities. Interest rate derivatives may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan's targeted investment policy. Alternative investment managers are permitted to employ leverage, including through the use of derivatives, which may alter economic exposure.

In December 20132014 an investment policy study was completed for the U.S. pension plans. The study resulted in new target asset allocations being approved for the U.S. pension plans with resulting changes to the expected long-term rate of return on assets. The weighted-average long-term rate of return on assets increaseddecreased from 5.8% at December 31, 2012 to 6.5% at December 31, 2013 due primarily to higher yields on fixed income securities.6.4% at December 31, 2014. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets used in determining pension expense for non-U.S. plans is determined in a similar manner to the U.S. plans.

Target Allocation Percentages

The following table summarizes the target allocations by asset category for U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans:
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. PlansU.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
Asset Categories       
Equity19% 28% 19% 30%16% 27% 19% 28%
Debt58% 49% 60% 53%60% 47% 58% 49%
Other(a)23% 23% 21% 17%24% 26% 23% 23%
Total100% 100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100% 100%
__________
(a)Primarily includes private equity, real estate and absolute return strategies which mainly consist of hedge funds.

Assets and Fair Value Measurements

The following tables summarize the fair value of U.S. defined benefit pension plan assets by asset class (dollars in millions):

106
90



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 Fair Value Measurements of U.S. Plan Assets at December 31, 2013 Fair Value Measurements of Non-U.S. Plan Assets at December 31, 2013 Total U.S. and Non-U.S. Plan Assets
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
Assets                 
Cash equivalents and other short-term investments$
 $411
 $
 $411
 $
 $156
 $
 $156
 $567
Common and preferred stocks(a)10,234
 70
 6
 10,310
 1,816
 6
 
 1,822
 12,132
Government and agency debt securities(b)
 14,971
 
 14,971
 
 3,418
 
 3,418
 18,389
Corporate debt securities(c)
 20,409
 58
 20,467
 
 2,410
 12
 2,422
 22,889
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
 238
 72
 310
 
 65
 2
 67
 377
Investment funds                 
Equity funds72
 190
 44
 306
 128
 1,930
 
 2,058
 2,364
Fixed income funds27
 8
 113
 148
 
 927
 12
 939
 1,087
Funds of hedge funds
 
 4,285
 4,285
 
 
 733
 733
 5,018
Other investment funds
 820
 732
 1,552
 
 672
 
 672
 2,224
Private equity and debt investments(d)
 
 6,335
 6,335
 
 
 430
 430
 6,765
Real estate investments(e)390
 4
 4,127
 4,521
 13
 12
 1,405
 1,430
 5,951
Other investments
 
 62
 62
 
 
 618
 618
 680
Derivatives                 
Interest rate contracts5
 46
 
 51
 1
 1
 
 2
 53
Foreign exchange and other contracts12
 111
 
 123
 2
 43
 
 45
 168
Total assets10,740
 37,278
 15,834
 63,852
 1,960
 9,640
 3,212
 14,812
 78,664
Liabilities                 
Derivatives                 
Interest rate contracts(22) (213) (6) (241) (12) 
 
 (12) (253)
Foreign exchange and other contracts
 (98) 
 (98) 
 (56) 
 (56) (154)
Total liabilities(22) (311) (6) (339) (12) (56) 
 (68) (407)
Net plan assets subject to leveling$10,718
 $36,967
 $15,828
 63,513
 $1,948
 $9,584
 $3,212
 14,744
 78,257
Other plan assets and liabilities(g)      653
       242
 895
Net Plan Assets      $64,166
       $14,986
 $79,152
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets               
Cash equivalents and other short-term investments$
 $42
 $
 $42
 $
 $411
 $
 $411
Common and preferred stocks10,033
 30
 3
 10,066
 10,234
 70
 6
 10,310
Government and agency debt securities(a)
 16,143
 
 16,143
 
 14,971
 
 14,971
Corporate and other debt securities(b)
 22,725
 83
 22,808
 
 20,647
 130
 20,777
Investment funds(c)70
 910
 5,221
 6,201
 99
 1,018
 5,174
 6,291
Private equity and debt investments(d)
 
 5,909
 5,909
 
 
 6,335
 6,335
Real estate investments(e)560
 2
 3,608
 4,170
 390
 4
 4,127
 4,521
Other investments
 
 65
 65
 
 
 62
 62
Derivative assets55
 313
 1
 369
 17
 157
 
 174
Total assets10,718
 40,165
 14,890
 65,773
 10,740
 37,278
 15,834
 63,852
Liabilities               
Derivative liabilities(23) (496) 
 (519) (22) (311) (6) (339)
Net plan assets subject to leveling$10,695
 $39,669
 $14,890
 65,254
 $10,718
 $36,967
 $15,828
 63,513
Other plan assets and liabilities(f)      569
       653
Net Plan Assets      $65,823
       $64,166


107



TableThe following tables summarize the fair value of Contentsnon-U.S. defined benefit pension plan assets by asset class (dollars in millions):
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 Fair Value Measurements of U.S. Plan Assets at December 31, 2012 Fair Value Measurements of Non-U.S. Plan Assets at December 31, 2012 Total U.S. and Non-U.S. Plan Assets
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
Assets                 
Cash equivalents and other short-term investments$
 $551
 $
 $551
 $
 $151
 $
 $151
 $702
Common and preferred stocks(a)9,663
 26
 19
 9,708
 2,227
 
 
 2,227
 11,935
Government and agency debt securities(b)
 17,835
 
 17,835
 
 3,722
 
 3,722
 21,557
Corporate debt securities(c)
 19,116
 77
 19,193
 
 2,596
 2
 2,598
 21,791
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
 1,804
 105
 1,909
 
 54
 3
 57
 1,966
Investment funds                 
Equity funds66
 253
 195
 514
 212
 2,009
 
 2,221
 2,735
Fixed income funds16
 498
 190
 704
 
 1,046
 14
 1,060
 1,764
Funds of hedge funds
 
 3,768
 3,768
 
 
 627
 627
 4,395
Other investment funds
 837
 806
 1,643
 
 35
 
 35
 1,678
Private equity and debt investments(d)
 
 6,400
 6,400
 
 
 381
 381
 6,781
Real estate investments(e)412
 
 4,335
 4,747
 19
 31
 1,422
 1,472
 6,219
Other investments
 
 63
 63
 
 
 665
 665
 728
Derivatives                 
Interest rate contracts15
 1,553
 
 1,568
 
 
 
 
 1,568
Foreign exchange and other contracts6
 124
 1
 131
 2
 40
 
 42
 173
Total assets10,178
 42,597
 15,959
 68,734
 2,460
 9,684
 3,114
 15,258
 83,992
Liabilities                 
Mortgage and asset-backed securities(f)
 (15) 
 (15) 
 
 
 
 (15)
Derivatives                 
Interest rate contracts(21) (977) (8) (1,006) (4) 
 
 (4) (1,010)
Foreign exchange and other contracts(4) (123) (1) (128) (1) (36) 
 (37) (165)
Total liabilities(25) (1,115) (9) (1,149) (5) (36) 
 (41) (1,190)
Net plan assets subject to leveling$10,153
 $41,482
 $15,950
 67,585
 $2,455
 $9,648
 $3,114
 15,217
 82,802
Other plan assets and liabilities(g)      500
       324
 824
Net Plan Assets      $68,085
       $15,541
 $83,626
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets               
Cash equivalents and other short-term investments$
 $207
 $
 $207
 $
 $156
 $
 $156
Common and preferred stocks1,959
 3
 
 1,962
 1,816
 6
 
 1,822
Government and agency debt securities(a)
 3,614
 
 3,614
 
 3,418
 
 3,418
Corporate and other debt securities(b)
 1,986
 
 1,986
 
 2,475
 14
 2,489
Investment funds(c)101
 3,409
 889
 4,399
 128
 3,529
 745
 4,402
Private equity and debt investments(d)
 
 509
 509
 
 
 430
 430
Real estate investments(e)20
 4
 1,263
 1,287
 13
 12
 1,405
 1,430
Other investments
 
 722
 722
 
 
 618
 618
Derivative assets17
 24
 
 41
 3
 44
 
 47
Total assets2,097
 9,247
 3,383
 14,727
 1,960
 9,640
 3,212
 14,812
Liabilities               
Derivative liabilities
 (44) 
 (44) (12) (56) 
 (68)
Net plan assets subject to leveling$2,097
 $9,203
 $3,383
 14,683
 $1,948
 $9,584
 $3,212
 14,744
Other plan assets and liabilities(f)      (14)       242
Net Plan Assets      $14,669
       $14,986
__________
(a)
Includes GM common stock of $2 million and $1.4 billion in Level 1 of U.S. plan assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012.
(b)Includes U.S. and sovereign government and agency issues. Excludes
(b)Includes mortgage and asset-backed securities.
(c)Includes bank debt obligations.U.S. and non-U.S. Level 3 assets consist primarily of funds of hedge funds. Non-U.S. Level 2 assets consist primarily of equity and fixed income funds.
(d)Includes private equity investment funds.
(e)Includes investment funds and public real estate investment trusts.
(f)Primarily investments sold short.
(g)Cash held by the plans, net of amounts receivable/payable for unsettled security transactions and payables for investment manager fees, custody fees and other expenses.

The following tables summarize the activity for U.S. defined benefit pension plan net assets measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs (dollars in millions):

108
91



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 Balance at January 1, 2013 
Net Realized/Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases, Sales and
Settlements, Net
 Transfers Into/Out of Level 3 Balance at December 31, 2013 
Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Attributable to Assets Held at
December 31, 2013
Assets           
Common and preferred stocks$19
 $3
 $(16) $
 $6
 $1
Corporate debt securities77
 5
 (24) 
 58
 (2)
Mortgage and asset-backed securities105
 1
 (34) 
 72
 (1)
Investment funds           
Equity funds195
 (3) (148) 
 44
 
Fixed income funds190
 17
 (94) 
 113
 11
Funds of hedge funds3,768
 498
 19
 
 4,285
 497
Other investment funds806
 40
 (114) 
 732
 29
Private equity and debt investments6,400
 926
 (991) 
 6,335
 436
Real estate investments4,335
 458
 (666) 
 4,127
 190
Other investments63
 (2) 1
 
 62
 (2)
Total assets15,958
 1,943
 (2,067) 
 15,834
 1,159
Derivatives, net           
Interest rate contracts(8) 2
 
 
 (6) 1
Total net assets$15,950
 $1,945
 $(2,067) $
 $15,828
 $1,160
 Balance at January 1, 2014 
Net Realized/Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases, Sales and
Settlements, Net
 Transfers Into/Out of Level 3 Balance at December 31, 2014 
Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Attributable to Assets Held at
December 31, 2014
Common and preferred stocks$6
 $2
 $(5) $
 $3
 $
Corporate and other debt securities130
 
 (41) (6) 83
 (4)
Investment funds5,174
 231
 (184) 
 5,221
 208
Private equity and debt investments6,335
 651
 (1,077) 
 5,909
 27
Real estate investments4,127
 251
 (770) 
 3,608
 68
Other investments62
 5
 (2) 
 65
 5
Derivatives, net(6) (4) 11
 
 1
 
Total net assets$15,828
 $1,136
 $(2,068) $(6) $14,890
 $304
 Balance at January 1, 2012 
Net Realized/Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases, Sales and
Settlements, Net
 Transfers Into/Out of Level 3 Balance at December 31, 2012 
Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Attributable to Assets Held at
December 31, 2012
Assets           
Common and preferred stocks$46
 $1
 $(25) $(3) $19
 $3
Government and agency debt securities3
 (1) (2) 
 
 
Corporate debt securities352
 1
 (258) (18) 77
 (35)
Mortgage and asset-backed securities197
 34
 (120) (6) 105
 24
Group annuity contracts3,209
 77
 (3,286) 
 
 
Investment funds           
Equity funds521
 51
 (414) 37
 195
 18
Fixed income funds1,210
 47
 (1,067) 
 190
 (3)
Funds of hedge funds5,918
 310
 (2,460) 
 3,768
 239
Other investment funds2,270
 55
 (1,531) 12
 806
 (2)
Private equity and debt investments8,444
 1,022
 (3,038) (28) 6,400
 154
Real estate investments5,092
 198
 (955) 
 4,335
 (80)
Other investments
 
 63
 
 63
 
Total assets27,262
 1,795
 (13,093) (6) 15,958
 318
Derivatives, net           
Interest rate contracts7
 3
 (14) (4) (8) (1)
Foreign exchange and other contracts(6) 1
 5
 
 
 
Total net assets$27,263
 $1,799
 $(13,102) $(10) $15,950
 $317
 Balance at January 1, 2013 
Net Realized/Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases, Sales and
Settlements, Net
 Transfers Into/Out of Level 3 Balance at December 31, 2013 
Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Attributable to Assets Held at
December 31, 2013
Common and preferred stocks$19
 $3
 $(16) $
 $6
 $1
Corporate and other debt securities182
 6
 (58) 
 130
 (3)
Investment funds4,959
 552
 (337) 
 5,174
 537
Private equity and debt investments6,400
 926
 (991) 
 6,335
 436
Real estate investments4,335
 458
 (666) 
 4,127
 190
Other investments63
 (2) 1
 
 62
 (2)
Derivatives, net(8) 2
 
 
 (6) 1
Total net assets$15,950
 $1,945
 $(2,067) $
 $15,828
 $1,160

The following tables summarize the activity for non-U.S. defined benefit pension plan assets measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs (dollars in millions):
 Balance at January 1, 2014 
Net Realized/Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases, Sales and
Settlements, Net
 Transfers Into/Out of Level 3 Effect of Foreign Currency Balance at December 31, 2014 
Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Attributable to Assets Held at
December 31, 2014
Corporate and other debt securities$14
 $
 $(13) $
 $(1) $
 $
Investment funds745
 103
 111
 
 (70) 889
 103
Private equity and debt investments430
 100
 20
 
 (41) 509
 75
Real estate investments1,405
 48
 (84) 
 (106) 1,263
 44
Other investments618
 92
 72
 
 (60) 722
 76
Total assets$3,212
 $343
 $106
 $
 $(278) $3,383
 $298

109
92



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 Balance at January 1, 2013 
Net Realized/Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases, Sales and
Settlements, Net
 Transfers Into/Out of Level 3 Effect of Foreign Currency Balance at December 31, 2013 
Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Attributable to Assets Held at
December 31, 2013
Assets             
Corporate debt securities$2
 $1
 $8
 $1
 $
 $12
 $1
Mortgage and asset-backed securities3
 
 (1) 
 
 2
 
Investment funds             
Fixed income funds14
 (1) (1) 
 
 12
 
Funds of hedge funds627
 111
 28
 
 (33) 733
 112
Private equity and debt investments381
 73
 3
 
 (27) 430
 53
Real estate investments1,422
 103
 (57) 
 (63) 1,405
 122
Other investments665
 (10) (43) 
 6
 618
 4
Total assets$3,114
 $277
 $(63) $1
 $(117) $3,212
 $292
 Balance at January 1, 2012 
Net Realized/Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases, Sales and
Settlements, Net
 Transfers Into/Out of Level 3 Effect of Foreign Currency Balance at December 31, 2012 
Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Attributable to Assets Held at
December 31, 2012
Assets             
Government and agency debt securities$1
 $
 $(1) $
 $
 $
 $
Corporate debt securities4
 2
 (4) 
 
 2
 
Mortgage and asset-backed securities4
 
 (4) 3
 
 3
 
Investment funds             
Equity funds146
 (24) (124) 
 2
 
 
Fixed income funds20
 
 (6) 
 
 14
 
Funds of hedge funds585
 25
 
 
 17
 627
 26
Other investment funds247
 17
 (269) 
 5
 
 
Private equity and debt investments298
 46
 29
 
 8
 381
 24
Real estate investments1,345
 123
 (82) 
 36
 1,422
 119
Other investments428
 16
 203
 
 18
 665
 10
Total assets$3,078
 $205
 $(258) $3
 $86
 $3,114
 $179
 Balance at January 1, 2013 
Net Realized/Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 
Purchases, Sales and
Settlements, Net
 Transfers Into/Out of Level 3 Effect of Foreign Currency Balance at December 31, 2013 
Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses) Attributable to Assets Held at
December 31, 2013
Corporate and other debt securities$5
 $1
 $7
 $1
 $
 $14
 $1
Investment funds641
 110
 27
 
 (33) 745
 112
Private equity and debt investments381
 73
 3
 
 (27) 430
 53
Real estate investments1,422
 103
 (57) 
 (63) 1,405
 122
Other investments665
 (10) (43) 
 6
 618
 4
Total assets$3,114
 $277
 $(63) $1
 $(117) $3,212
 $292

Investment Fund Strategies

Investment funds consist primarily of equity funds, fixed income funds and funds of hedge funds. Equity funds include funds that invest in U.S. common and preferred stocks as well as similar equity securities issued by companies incorporated, listed or domiciled in developed and/or emerging markets countries.

Fixed income funds include investments in high quality funds and to a lesser extent, high yield funds as well as in credit arbitrage funds. High quality fixed income funds invest in government securities, investment-grade corporate bonds mortgagesand mortgage and asset-backed securities. High yield fixed income funds invest in high yield fixed income securities issued by corporations which are rated below investment grade, are unrated but are believed by the investment manager to have similar risk characteristics or are rated investment grade or higher but are priced at yields comparable to securities rated below investment grade and believed to have similar risk characteristics. Credit arbitrage funds invest in a variety of credit and credit-related instruments that allow fund managers to profit from mispricing of these credit instruments. Certain derivatives may be used for hedging purposes by some fixed income fund managers to limit exposure to various risk factors.

grade. Funds of hedge funds represent funds that invest in a portfolio of hedge funds. Fund managers typically seek to achieve their objectives by allocating capital across a broad array of funds and/or investment managers.


110



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Other investment funds also included in this category primarily represent multi-strategy funds. These funds that invest in broadly diversified portfolios of equity, fixed income and derivative instruments. Certain funds may also employ multiple alternative investment strategies, in combination, such as global macro, event-driven (which seeks to profit from opportunities created by significant transactional events such as spin-offs, mergers and acquisitions, bankruptcy reorganizations, recapitalizations and share buybacks) and relative value (which seeks to take advantage of pricing discrepancies between instruments including equities, debt, options and futures).

Private equity and debt investments principally consistsconsist of investments in private equity and debt funds. These investments provide exposure to and benefit from long-term equity investments in private companies, including leveraged buy-outs, venture capital and distressed debt strategies.

Real estate investments include funds that invest in entities which are principally engaged in the ownership, acquisition, development, financing, sale and/or management of income-producing real estate properties, both commercial and residential. These funds typically seek long-term growth of capital and current income that is above average relative to public equity funds.

Significant Concentrations of Risk

The assets of the pension plans include certain private investment funds, private equity and debt securities, real estate investments and derivative instruments. Investment managers may be unable to quickly sell or redeem some or all of these investments at an amount close or equal to fair value in order to meet a plan's liquidity requirements or to respond to specific events such as deterioration in the creditworthiness of any particular issuer or counterparty.

Illiquid investments held by the plans are generally long-term investments that complement the long-term nature of pension obligations and are not used to fund benefit payments when currently due. Plan management monitors liquidity risk on an ongoing basis and has procedures in place that are designed to maintain flexibility in addressing plan-specific, broader industry and market liquidity events.

The pension plans may invest in financial instruments denominated in foreign currencies and may be exposed to risks that the foreign currency exchange rates might change in a manner that has an adverse effect on the value of the foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. Forward currency contracts may be used to manage and mitigate foreign currency risk.

The pension plans may invest in fixed income securities for which any change in the relevant interest rates for particular securities might result in an investment manager being unable to secure similar returns upon the maturity or the sale of securities. In addition, changes to prevailing interest rates or changes in expectations of future interest rates might result in an increase or decrease in the fair value of the securities held. Interest rate swaps and other financial derivative instruments may be used to manage interest rate risk.


93



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Counterparty credit risk is the risk that a counterparty to a financial instrument will default on its commitment. Counterparty risk is primarily related to over-the-counter derivative instruments used to manage risk exposures related to interest rates on long-term debt securities and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The risk of default can be influenced by various factors including macro-economic conditions, market liquidity, fiscal and monetary policies and counterparty-specific characteristics and activities. Certain agreements with counterparties employ set-off, collateral support arrangements and other risk mitigating procedures designed to reduce the net exposure to credit risk in the event of counterparty default. Credit policies and processes are in place to manage concentrations of counterparty risk by seeking to undertake transactions with large well-capitalized counterparties and by monitoring the creditworthiness of these counterparties. The majority of derivatives held by the plans at December 31, 20132014 were fully collateralized and therefore, the related counterparty credit risk was significantly reduced.

Pension Funding Requirements

We are subject to a variety of U.S. federal rules and regulations, including the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended and the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which govern the manner in which we fund and administer our pensions for our retired employees and their spouses. In 2012 the U.S. government enacted thepension plans. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act which allowsexpired on September 30, 2014 allowed plan sponsors funding relief for pension plans through the application of higher funding interest rates. The 2014 Highway and Transportation Funding Act extended the application of higher funding interest rates. As a result, underutilizing current economic conditions,assumptions we expect no significant mandatory contributions to our U.S. qualified pension plans for at leastthe next five years. The new law does not impact our reported funded status. We have no funding requirements for our U.S. qualified plans in 2014.2015.


111



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


We also maintain pension plans for employees in a number of countries outside the U.S. which are subject to local laws and regulations. Except for Canada and the United Kingdom, most non-U.S. pension laws and regulations do not have specific funding requirements.

Benefit Payments

The following table summarizes net benefit payments expected to be paid in the future, which include assumptions related to estimated future employee service (dollars in millions):
Pension Benefits(a) Other BenefitsPension Benefits(a) Other Benefits
U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. PlansU.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans U.S. Plans Non-U.S. Plans
2014$5,780
 $1,609
 $376
 $77
2015$5,687
 $1,597
 $364
 $65
$5,616
 $1,530
 $344
 $59
2016$5,475
 $1,688
 $352
 $65
$5,572
 $1,570
 $331
 $63
2017$5,368
 $1,711
 $341
 $65
$5,380
 $1,558
 $322
 $61
2018$5,210
 $1,581
 $332
 $66
$5,239
 $1,458
 $313
 $63
2019 - 2023$24,019
 $7,858
 $1,576
 $357
2019$5,128
 $1,448
 $307
 $65
2020 - 2024$23,754
 $7,136
 $1,470
 $348
__________
(a)Benefits for most U.S. pension plans and certain non-U.S. pension plans are paid out of plan assets rather than our Cash and cash equivalents.

Note 16. Derivative Financial Instruments

Automotive

At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 our derivative instruments consisted primarily of options and forward contracts primarily related to foreign currency, none of which were designated as hedging relationships. We had derivative instruments in asset positions with notional amounts of $9.3$8.8 billion and $9.19.3 billion and liability positions with notional amounts of $953 million and $427 million and $1.6 billionat December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. The fair value of these derivative instruments was insignificant.

Automotive Financing - GM Financial

GM Financial had interest rate swaps and caps and foreign currency swaps in asset positions with notional amounts of $3.8$5.4 billion and $775 million5.5 billion and liability positions with notional amounts of $5.5$8.5 billion and $775 million7.6 billion at December 31, 20132014 and 2012. As a result of the acquisition of certain Ally Financial international operations, GM Financial had foreign currency swaps with notional amounts of $1.7 billion and $2.1 billion in asset and liability positions at December 31, 2013. The fair value of these derivative financial instruments was insignificant.

94



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies

The following tables summarize information related to commitments and contingencies (dollars in millions):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Liability Recorded Maximum Liability(a) Liability Recorded Maximum Liability(a)Liability Recorded Maximum Liability(a) Liability Recorded Maximum Liability(a)
Guarantees              
Third-party commercial loans and other obligations(b)$51
 $15,616
 $168
 $22,496
$37
 $197
 $51
 $15,616
Other product-related claims$54
 $1,317
 $51
 $1,040
$51
 $2,458
 $54
 $1,317
__________
(a)Calculated as future undiscounted payments.
(b)
Includes liabilities recorded of $10 million and $15 million and maximum liabilities of $15.3 billion and $22.1 billion related to Ally Financial repurchase obligations at December 31, 2013 and 20122013.

112



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Liability RecordedLiability Recorded
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Other litigation-related liability and tax administrative matters(a)$1,227
 $1,728
$1,000
 $1,227
Product liability$690
 $601
$732
 $690
Credit card programs(b)   
Redemption liability(c)$183
 $209
Deferred revenue(d)$295
 $355
Ignition switch recall compensation program$315
  
Credit card programs(a)   
Redemption liability(b)$87
 $183
Deferred revenue(c)$263
 $295
Environmental liability$154
 $166
$133
 $154
Asset retirement obligations$146
 $159
__________
(a)Primarily indirect tax-related litigation as well as various non-U.S. labor related matters.
(b)
Credit card programs offer rebates that can be applied primarily against the purchase or lease of our vehicles. At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 qualified cardholders had rebates available, net of deferred program revenue, of approximately $2.6$2.3 billion and $2.9$2.6 billion.
(c)(b)Recorded in Accrued liabilities.
(d)(c)Recorded in Other liabilities and deferred income taxes.liabilities.

Guarantees

We provide payment guarantees on commercial loans outstanding with third parties such as dealers or rental car companies. These guarantees either expire in 2018 or are ongoing. We determined the fair value ascribed to the guarantees at inception and subsequent to inception to be insignificant based on the credit worthiness of the third parties. In March 2014 a new agreement was signed with Ally Financial that removed the repurchase obligation for vehicles invoiced after December 31, 2013. The repurchase obligation for vehicles invoiced prior to December 31, 2013 was maintained until December 31, 2014 at which time repurchase obligations expired for all vehicles.

We have agreementsAgreements with third parties that guarantee the fulfillment of certain suppliers' commitments and other obligations. These guaranteesobligations expire in 20142015 through 2016 or are ongoing,2019 or upon the occurrence of specific events.events or are ongoing.

In some instances certain assets of the party whose debt or performance we have guaranteed may offset, to some degree, the cost of the guarantee. The offset of certain of our payables to guaranteed parties may also offset certain guarantees, if triggered. If vehicles are required to be repurchased under vehicle repurchase obligations, the total exposure would be reduced to the extent vehicles are able to be resold to another dealer.

In connection with certain divestitures of assets or operating businesses, we have entered into agreements indemnifying certain buyers and other parties with respect to environmental conditions and other closure costs pertaining to real property we owned. We periodically enter into agreements that incorporate indemnification provisions in the normal course of business. It is not possible to estimate our maximum exposure under these indemnifications or guarantees due to the conditional nature of these obligations. ImmaterialInsignificant amounts have been recorded for such obligations as the majority of them are not probable or estimable at this time and the fair value of the guarantees at issuance was insignificant.

In addition, to the guarantees and indemnifying agreements previously discussed, we indemnify dealers for certain product liability related claims as subsequently discussed.

95



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



With respect to other product-related claims involving products manufactured by certain joint ventures, we believe that costs incurred are adequately covered by recorded accruals. These guarantees terminate in years ranging from 2020 to 2027.2029.

Other Litigation-Related Liability and Tax Administrative Matters

Various legal actions, governmental investigations, claims and proceedings are pending against us including matters arising out of alleged product defects; employment-related matters; governmental regulations relating to safety, emissions and fuel economy; product warranties; financial services; dealer, supplier and other contractual relationships; tax-related matters not recorded pursuant to ASC 740, "Income Taxes" (indirect tax-related matters) and environmental matters.

With regard to the litigation matters discussed in the previous paragraph, reserves have been established for matters in which we believe that losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated, the majority of which are associated with indirect tax-related matters as well as non-U.S. labor-related matters. Indirect tax-related matters are being litigated globally pertaining to value added taxes, customs, duties, sales, property taxes and other non-income tax related tax exposures. The various non-U.S. labor-related matters include claims from current and former employees related to alleged unpaid wage, benefit, severance and other compensation matters. Certain South American administrative proceedings are indirect tax-related and may require that we deposit

113



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


funds in escrow. Escrow deposits may range from $500$500 million to $800 million.$700 million. Some of the matters may involve compensatory, punitive or other treble damage claims, environmental remediation programs or sanctions that, if granted, could require us to pay damages or make other expenditures in amounts that could not be reasonably estimated at December 31, 20132014. We believe that appropriate accruals have been established for such matters based on information currently available. Reserves for litigation losses are recorded in Accrued liabilities and Other liabilities and deferred income taxes.liabilities. Litigation is inherently unpredictable however; and unfavorable resolutions could occur. Accordingly it is possible that an adverse outcome from such proceedings could exceed the amounts accrued in an amount that could be material to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in any particular reporting period.

GM Korea Wage LitigationProceedings Related to Ignition Switch and Other Recalls

Commencing onIn the three months ended March 31, 2014 we announced recalls to repair ignition switches that under certain circumstances could unintentionally move from the “run” position to the “accessory” or about September 29, 2010 current and former hourly employees“off” position with a corresponding loss of GM Korea filed eight separate group actionspower, which in turn may prevent airbags from deploying in the Incheon District Court in Incheon, Korea. The cases, which in aggregate involve more than 10,000 employees, allege that GM Korea failed to include bonusesevent of a crash. Those recalls included Chevrolet Cobalt and certain allowances in its calculation of Ordinary Wages due under the Presidential Decree of the Korean Labor Standards Act. In November 2012 the Seoul High Court (an intermediate level appellate court) issued a decision affirming a decision of the Incheon District Court in a case involving five GM Korea employees which was contrary to GM Korea's position in all of these cases. GM Korea appealed to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea (Supreme Court)HHR, Pontiac G5, Pursuit and initiated a constitutional challenge to the adverse interpretation of the relevant statute. At September 30, 2013 we had an accrual of 843 billion South Korean Won (equivalent to $784 million) in connection with these cases. In December 2013, the Supreme Court rendered a decision in a case involving another company not affiliated with us which addressed many of the issues presented in the cases pending against GM KoreaSolstice and resolved many of them in a manner which we believe is favorable to GM Korea. In particular, while the Supreme Court held that fixed bonuses should be included in the calculation of Ordinary Wages, it also held that claims for retroactive application of this rule would be barred under certain circumstances. We believe the Supreme Court’s reasoning is applicable to GM Korea, even though GM Korea’s case remains pending before the Supreme Court. Accordingly,Saturn ION and Sky vehicles. Since those recalls, we have eliminated the accrual associated with these cases. Inannounced a number of additional recalls in the year ended December 31, 20132014 relating to safety, customer satisfaction and other matters.

Through January 30, 2015 we recordedare aware of 108 putative class actions that are pending against GM in various U.S. District Courts and state courts alleging that consumers who purchased or leased GM vehicles have been economically harmed by one or more of the recalls announced this year and/or the underlying vehicle conditions associated with those recalls (economic-loss cases). Additionally, through January 30, 2015, 20 putative class actions have been filed in various Provincial Courts in Canada seeking similar relief as the U.S.-based cases. In the aggregate, these economic-loss cases seek recovery for purported compensatory damages, including alleged diminution in value of the vehicles, punitive damages, and injunctive and other relief. In addition through January 30, 2015, we are aware of 104 actions pending against GM alleging injury or death as a net reductionresult of our accrualdefects that may be the subject of recalls announced in the year ended December 31, 2014, including faulty ignition switches and/or the failure of air bags to properly deploy due to faulty ignition switches (personal injury cases). In the aggregate these personal injury cases seek recovery for purported compensatory damages, punitive damages and other relief.

Since June 2014 the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has issued orders from time to time directing that certain pending economic-loss and personal injury federal lawsuits involving alleged faulty ignition switches or other defects that may be related to the recalls announced in 2014 be transferred to, and consolidated in, a single federal court, the Southern District of New York (the multidistrict litigation). Through January 30, 2015, 156 cases have been transferred and consolidated as part of the multidistrict litigation. We have requested that various other recently filed federal lawsuits also be transferred and consolidated in the multidistrict litigation. The court in the multidistrict litigation has appointed lead counsel to prosecute the claims on behalf of all plaintiffs in the consolidated cases. On October 14, 2014 lead counsel filed two amended consolidated complaints. Because the majority of plaintiffs in these actions are suing over vehicles manufactured by pre-bankruptcy General Motors Corporation, we are seeking to enforce the terms of the federal Bankruptcy Court’s July 2009 Sale Order and Injunction to preclude liability for any economic loss damages based on vehicles and parts manufactured prior to July 2009. These cases are in their early stages. In addition to the cases pending in the multidistrict litigation, other economic-loss and personal injury cases related to ignition-switch and other alleged defects that may be the subject of recalls in 2014 are pending in various other state and federal courts

96



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


throughout the country. The cases pending in other state courts include a November 19, 2014 lawsuit filed by the Attorney General for Arizona against GM in Arizona state court alleging claims similar to those alleged in the economic-loss actions discussed above and seeking an injunction, civil penalties and other relief.

Through January 30, 2015 we are aware of two actions that have been filed against GM alleging that GM’s purported concealment of the ignition switch and other defects that have been the subject of recalls in 2014 has diminished the value of other GM vehicles and seeking economic damages under California consumer protection statutes. One of these actions is a putative class action that has been consolidated with the ignition switch putative class actions and transferred to the Southern District of New York. The other action was brought by the Orange County, California district attorney and is pending in California state court. In the aggregate, these actions seek recovery under California consumer protection statutes for economic damages as well as civil penalties, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs.

On March 21, 2014 a putative shareholder class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against GM and various current and former officers or employees of GM (746 billion South Korean Won (equivalent to $711 millionPio v. General Motors Company et al.) on behalf of purchasers of GM securities from November 17, 2010 through March 10, 2014. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misstatements and omissions relating to Automotive costproblems with the ignition switch and other matters in SEC filings. Plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary damages, interest and attorneys’ fees and costs. The court appointed the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System as the lead plaintiff. On January 15, 2015 New York State Teachers’ Retirement System filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint against GM and several current and former officers and employees. The Consolidated Class Action Complaint supersedes the complaint filed March 21, 2014 in this same case.

On March 28, 2014 a shareholder derivative action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of salesMichigan against certain current and former GM directors (77%Hockstein v. Barra, et al.). The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment by GM’s directors in connection with monitoring, remediation and disclosure of the issues underlying the ignition switch recall. Between April 9, 2014 and July 22, 2014, similar shareholder derivative actions were filed in the Eastern District of Michigan (Police Retirement System of St. Louis v. Barra, et al.), the Circuit Court for Wayne County, Michigan (Bekkerman v. Barra, et al., Wietschiner, et al. v. Barra, et al.) and the Chancery Court for the State of Delaware (Nash v. Barra, et al., DiStefano v. Barra, et al., Newspaper and Magazine Employees Union v. Barra, et al., Boso v. Solso, et al.). All of these actions seek damages allegedly resulting from defendants’ failure to timely identify, correct and disclose the ignition switch defect, an order compelling implementation of various corporate governance policies and practices and other relief purportedly for the benefit of GM.

With regard to the two above listed shareholder derivative actions pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against certain current and former GM directors, those actions have been consolidated and we filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint on October 9, 2014. On January 11, 2015 the court issued an order suspending further proceedings in the actions and holding our motion to dismiss in abeyance pending disposition of the parallel action currently being litigated in Delaware Chancery Court (In re General Motors Deriv. Litig., C.A. No. 9627-VCG). With regard to that pending litigation in Delaware Chancery Court, the four above listed shareholder derivative actions pending in that court have been consolidated and plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint on October 13, 2014. We filed a motion to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint on December 5, 2014. With regard to the two above listed derivative actions filed in the Circuit Court of which is reflectedWayne County, Michigan, those actions have been consolidated and stayed pending the federal derivative actions.

We are also the subject of various inquiries, investigations, subpoenas and requests for information from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, Congress, the SEC, Transport Canada and 49 state attorneys general in our Net income attributableconnection with the 2014 recalls. We are investigating these matters and believe we are cooperating fully with all requests. Such investigations and discussions could in the future result in the imposition of material damages, fines or civil and criminal penalties and other remedies.

We are currently unable to stockholders based on our ownership interest in GM Korea). We estimate oura range of reasonably possible loss as defined by ASC 450, “Contingencies,” to be 632 billion South Korean Won (equivalent to $599 million)for the lawsuits and investigations because these matters involve significant uncertainties at December 31, 2013. We are also party to litigation with current and former salaried employees over allegations relating to Ordinary Wages regulation. Althoughthese early stages. These uncertainties include the issues differ due to differences between hourly and salaried benefit design, we believelegal theory or the latest decisionnature of the Supreme Court also impacts this litigation. At December 31, 2013 we have identified a reasonably possible loss in excessclaims as well as the complexity of the amountfacts. Although we cannot estimate a reasonable range of loss based on currently available information, the resolution of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our accrualfinancial position, results of 165 billion South Korean Won (equivalent to $156 million). Both the scope of claims asserted and GM Korea's assessment of anyoperations or all of the individual claim elements may change if new information becomes available.cash flows.

GMCL Dealers' Claim


97



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


On February 12, 2010 a claim was filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against GMCLGeneral Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) on behalf of a purported class of over 200 former GMCL dealers (the Plaintiff Dealers) which had entered into wind-down agreements with GMCL. In May 2009 in the context of the global restructuring of the business and the possibility that GMCL might be required to initiate insolvency proceedings, GMCL offered the Plaintiff Dealers the wind-down agreements to assist with their exit from the GMCL dealer network and to facilitate winding down their operations in an orderly fashion by December 31, 2009 or such other date as GMCL approved but no later than on October 31, 2010. The Plaintiff Dealers allege that the Dealer Sales and Service Agreements were wrongly terminated by GMCL and that GMCL failed to comply with certain disclosure obligations, breached its statutory duty of fair dealing and unlawfully interfered with the Plaintiff Dealers' statutory right to associate in an attempt to coerce the Plaintiff Dealers into accepting the wind-down agreements. The Plaintiff Dealers seek damages and assert that the wind-down agreements are rescindable. The Plaintiff Dealers' initial pleading makes reference to a claim “not exceeding” Canadian Dollar $750CAD $750 million,, without explanation of any specific measure of damages. On March 1, 2011 the court approved certification of a class for the purpose of deciding a number of specifically defined issues including: (1) whether GMCL breached its obligation of "good faith" in offering the wind-down agreements; (2) whether GMCL interfered with the Plaintiff Dealers' rights of free association; (3) whether GMCL was obligated to provide a disclosure statement and/or disclose more specific information regarding its restructuring plans in connection with proffering the wind-down agreements; and (4) assuming liability, whether the Plaintiff Dealers can recover damages in the aggregate (as opposed to proving individual damages). A number of former dealers have opted out of participation in the litigation, leaving 181 dealers in the certified class. Trial of the class issues is scheduled to occurwas completed in the thirdfourth quarter of 2014. We are now awaiting a decision from the Ontario Superior Court. The current prospects for liability are uncertain, but because liability is not deemed probable we have no accrual relating to this

114



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


litigation. We cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible loss in the event of liability as the case presents a variety of different legal theories, none of which GMCL believes are valid.

UAW Claim

On April 6, 2010 the UAW filed suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan claiming that we breached anour obligation to contribute $450$450 million to the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust (New VEBA).New VEBA. The UAW alleges that we were contractually required to make this contribution.contribution pursuant to the UAW-Delphi-GM Memorandum of Understanding Delphi Restructuring dated June 22, 2007. We believe this claim is without merit. On December 10, 2013 the court granted our motion for summary judgment and dismissed the claims asserted by the UAW, holding that the relevant agreement is unambiguous and does not require the payment sought. The UAW has appealed. At this juncture, we believeOn October 9, 2014 the prospectsUnited States Court of Appeals for liability on the claims asserted in this matterSixth Circuit heard oral arguments. We are remote.now awaiting a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Nova Scotia ClaimsGM Korea Wage Litigation

We were a participating party-in-interest in proceedings pendingCommencing on or about September 29, 2010 current and former hourly employees of GM Korea filed eight separate group actions in the U.S. BankruptcyIncheon District Court in Incheon, Korea. The cases, which in aggregate involve more than 10,000 employees, allege that GM Korea failed to include bonuses and certain allowances in its calculation of Ordinary Wages due under the Presidential Decree of the Korean Labor Standards Act. On November 23, 2012 the Seoul High Court (an intermediate level appellate court) issued a decision affirming a decision of the Incheon District Court in a case involving five GM Korea employees which was contrary to GM Korea's position. GM Korea appealed to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea (Supreme Court) and initiated a constitutional challenge to the adverse interpretation of the relevant statute. In December 2013 the Supreme Court rendered a decision in a case involving another company not affiliated with us which addressed many of the issues presented in the cases pending against GM Korea and resolved many of them in a manner which we believe is favorable to GM Korea. In particular, while the Supreme Court held that fixed bonuses should be included in the calculation of Ordinary Wages, it also held that claims for retroactive application of this rule would be barred under certain circumstances. On May 29, 2014 the Supreme Court rendered its decision with respect to the case involving the five GM Korea employees and remanded the case to the Seoul High Court consistent with its December 2013 ruling. In July 2014 GM Korea and its labor union agreed to include bonuses and certain allowances in ordinary wages retroactively to March 1, 2014. Therefore our accrual related to these cases was reclassified from a contingent liability to the Pensions liability. We estimate our reasonably possible loss, as defined by ASC 450, “Contingencies,” in excess of amounts accrued to be 562 billion South Korean Won (equivalent to $511 million) at December 31, 2014, which relates to periods before March 1, 2014. We are also party to litigation with current and former salaried employees over allegations relating to Ordinary Wages regulation. At December 31, 2014 we have identified a reasonably possible loss in excess of the amount of our accrual of 164 billion South Korean Won (equivalent to $149 million). Both the scope of claims asserted and GM Korea's assessment of any or all of the individual claim elements may change if new information becomes available. These cases are currently pending before various district courts in Korea and the Supreme Court.


98



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Inventory Management Securities Class Action

On June 29, 2012 a putative securities class action was filed against us and a number of our past and current officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (George G. Scott v. General Motors Company et al). Purporting to adjudicatesue on behalf of owners of common stock deriving from our 2010 initial public offering, plaintiff asserts non-fraud prospectus based liability claims under various federal securities statutes alleging that the Company has made false statements about its vehicle inventory controls and production decisions, particularly with respect to full-size trucks. The plaintiff's complaint requests compensatory damages, rescission and litigation costs, fees and disbursements. On November 21, 2012 the court appointed the Teamster's Local 710 Pension Fund as lead plaintiff in the Old matter. On February 1, 2013 the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On September 4, 2014 the district court granted our motion to dismiss, and dismissed the case with prejudice. Plaintiff filed an appeal.

GM bankruptcy arising fromFinancial Subpoena

In July 2014 GM Financial was served with a subpoena by the U.S. Department of Justice directing GM Financial to produce certain securities issueddocuments relating to GM Financial’s and its subsidiaries’ and affiliates’ origination and securitization of sub-prime automobile loans since 2007 in connection with an investigation by General Motors Nova Scotia Finance Company (Nova Scotia Finance), an Old GM subsidiary which we did not acquirethe U.S. Department of Justice in 2009 (Nova Scotia Claims Litigation). Althoughcontemplation of a civil proceeding for potential violations of the proceedings involved no claims against us, they presented issues which, depending upon their resolution, could have resulted in future claims against GMCL. In December 2013, pursuantFinancial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989. Among other matters, the subpoena requests information relating to the agreement, GMCL paid $50 millionunderwriting criteria used to originate these automobile loans and the representations and warranties relating to those underwriting criteria that were made in connection with the securitization of the automobile loans. GM Financial was subsequently served with additional investigative subpoenas to produce documents from state attorneys general and other governmental offices relating to its sub-prime automotive finance business and securitization of sub-prime automobile loans. In October 2014 GM Financial received a document request from the SEC in connection with its investigation into certain practices in sub-prime automobile loan securitization. GM Financial is investigating these matters internally and believes that it is cooperating with all requests. Such investigations could in the future result in the imposition of damages, fines or as directed by,civil or criminal claims and/or penalties. No assurance can be given that the Trusteeultimate outcome of Nova Scotia Financethe investigations or any resulting proceedings would not materially and we (including ouradversely affect GM Financial or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates) were released from all claims relating to Nova Scotia Finance, the Nova Scotia Claims Litigation and the transactions at issue in the litigation.affiliates.

Product Liability

With respect to product liability claims involving our and Old GM'sGeneral Motors Corporation's products, we believe that any judgment against us for actual damages will be adequately covered by our recorded accruals and, where applicable, excess liability insurance coverage. Although punitive damages are claimed in some of these lawsuits and such claims are inherently unpredictable, accruals incorporate historic experience with these types of claims. In addition we indemnify dealers for certain product liability related claims including products sold by General Motors Corporation's dealers. We monitor actual claims experience and make periodic adjustments to our estimates. Liabilities have been recorded in Accrued liabilities and Other liabilities and deferred income taxes for the expected cost of all known product liability claims plus an estimate of the expected cost for product liability claims that have already been incurred and are expected to be filed in the future for which we are self-insured.

We indemnify dealers In light of recent vehicle recalls it is reasonably possible that our accruals for certain product liability related claims including products sold by Old GM. We monitor actual claims experience and make periodic adjustments to our estimates. Based on both management's judgment concerning the projected number and value of both dealer indemnification obligations and product liability claims we have applied actuarial methodologies and estimated the liability. We expect our product liability reserve to risemay increase in future periods as new claims arise from incidents subsequent to July 9, 2009.in material amounts, although we cannot estimate a reasonable range of incremental loss based on currently available information.

Credit Card ProgramsIgnition Switch Recall Compensation Program

Credit card programs offer rebatesIn the three months ended June 30, 2014 we announced the creation of a compensation program (the Program) to compensate accident victims who died or suffered physical injury (or their families) as a result of a faulty ignition switch related to the 2.6 million vehicles recalled as more fully described in Note 13. It is important to our company that we reach everyone through this Program who has been impacted. The Program is being administered by an independent program administrator. The independent administrator has established a protocol that defines the eligibility requirements to participate in the Program. There is no cap on the amount of payments that can be applied primarilymade to claimants under the Program.

At December 31, 2014 we have an accrual of $315 million recorded in Corporate which represents our best estimate of remaining amounts that may be paid under the Program. However, it is reasonably possible that the liability could exceed our recorded amount by approximately $200 million. The most significant estimates affecting the amount recorded include the number of participants that have eligible claims related to death and physical injury, which also contemplates the severity of injury, the length of hospital stays and related compensation amounts and the number of people who actually elect to participate in the Program. Our estimate is subject to significant uncertainties, as programs of this nature are highly unusual and each eligible claim will have a unique

99



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


underlying fact pattern. While we do not anticipate material changes to our current estimate, it is possible that material changes could occur should actual eligible claims and the related compensation amounts differ from this estimate. The Program accepted claims from August 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015. Payments to eligible claimants began in the fourth quarter 2014 and will continue through the first half of 2015. Accident victims (or their families) could choose not to participate in the Program and pursue litigation against us. At January 30, 2015 the purchaseProgram had received 3,810 claims and the independent program administrator has determined 128 claims to be eligible for payment under the Program. Remaining claims are either under review, deficient awaiting further documentation or lease ofdeemed ineligible. Based on currently available information we believe our vehicles.accrual at December 31, 2014 is adequate to cover the estimated costs under the Program. At January 30, 2015 we have paid $93 million to eligible claimants under the Program. Accident victims that accept a payment under the Program agree to settle all claims against GM related to the accident.

Environmental Liability

Automotive operations, like operations of other companies engaged in similar businesses, are subject to a wide range of environmental protection laws, including laws regulating air emissions, water discharges, waste management and environmental remediation. Liabilities have been recorded primarily in Other liabilities and deferred income taxes for the expected costs to be paid over the periods of remediation for the applicable sites, which typically range from five to 30 years.years.

The final outcome of environmental matters cannot be predicted with certainty at this time. Subsequent adjustments to initial estimates are recorded as necessary based upon additional information obtained. In future periods new laws or regulations, advances in remediation technologies and additional information about the ultimate remediation methodology to be used could significantly change our estimates. It is possible that the resolution of one or more environmental matters could exceed the amounts accrued in an amount that could be material to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. At December 31, 20132014 we estimate the remediation losses could range from $120$110 million to $230 million.$210 million.

Other Matters

115



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



Brazil Excise Tax Incentive

In October 2012 the Brazilian government issued a decree which increased an excise tax rate by 30 percentage points, but also provided an offsetting tax incentive that requires participating companies to meet certain criteria, such as local investment and fuel efficiency standards. Participating companies that fail to meet the required criteria are subject to clawback provisions and fines. At December 31, 20132014 we believe it is reasonably assured that the program requirements will be met based on the current business model and available technologies.

GME Planned Spending GuaranteeKorea Fuel Economy Certification

As partWe determined the certified fuel economy ratings on our Cruze 1.8L gasoline vehicles sold in Korea were incorrect. We re-tested and re-certified the Cruze fuel economy ratings which fell below our prior certification and self-reported this issue to local government authorities. We voluntarily announced a customer compensation program for current and previous Cruze owners and recorded an insignificant charge in the three months ended December 31, 2014.
In November 2014 the Korean government released new fuel economy certification guidelines. We are reviewing the impact the new testing guidelines may have on the domestic fuel economy certification ratings of our Opel/Vauxhall restructuring plan agreed to with European labor representatives we have committed to achieving specified milestones associated with planned spending from 2011 to 2014 on certain product programs. If we fail to accomplish the requirements set out under the agreement we will be required to pay certain amounts up to Euro 265 million for each of those years, and/or interest on those amounts, to our employees. Certain inventory with a carrying amount of $200 million and $186 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was pledged as collateral under the agreement. Through December 31, 2013 spending was sufficient to meet the current requirements under the agreement and the specified milestones have been accomplished. Management has the intent and believes it has the ability to meet the future requirements under the agreement.products.

India Tavera Emissions Compliance

We have identifieddetermined there was an emissions compliance issue with thecertain Tavera models produced in India. We have self-reported this issue in the three months ended September 30, 2013 to local government authorities and will cooperate with any review they may conduct. Itare continuing to cooperate. We developed a solution, and while the issue was not safety related, we voluntarily recalled the vehicles to serve our customers. We believe our accrual at December 31, 2014 is too earlyadequate to determine the impact this issue will have on us or our Indian operations.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Asset retirement obligations relate to legal obligations associated with retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of a long-lived asset. An analysis is performed of such obligations associated with all real property owned or leased, including facilities, warehouses and offices. Estimates of conditional asset retirement obligations relate, in the case of owned properties, to costs estimated to be necessary for the legally required removal or remediation of various regulated materials, primarily asbestos. Asbestos abatement was estimated using site-specific surveys where available and a per square foot estimate where surveys were unavailable. For leased properties such obligations relate tocover the estimated costcosts of contractually required property restoration. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 accruals for asset retirement obligations were $159 million and $116 million.the recalled vehicles.

Noncancelable Operating Leases


100



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


The following table summarizes our minimum commitments under noncancelable operating leases having initial terms in excess of one year, primarily for property (dollars in millions):
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter
Minimum commitments(a)$363
 $290
 $225
 $156
 $132
 $499
$348
 $280
 $196
 $171
 $144
 $396
Sublease income(52) (58) (60) (59) (56) (293)(53) (62) (59) (56) (54) (248)
Net minimum commitments$311
 $232
 $165
 $97
 $76
 $206
$295
 $218
 $137
 $115
 $90
 $148
__________
(a)Certain of the leases contain escalation clauses and renewal or purchase options.

Rental expense under operating leases was $444 million, $477 million $474 million and $556$474 million in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.2012.

Note 18. Income Taxes

The following table summarizes income (loss) before income taxes and equity income and gain on investments (dollars in millions):

116



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
U.S. income (loss)$4,880
 $(19,063) $2,883
$1,683
 $4,880
 $(19,063)
Non-U.S. income (loss)768
 (11,194) 3,102
469
 768
 (11,194)
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity income and gain on investments$5,648
 $(30,257) $5,985
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity income$2,152
 $5,648
 $(30,257)

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The following table summarizes Income tax expense (benefit) (dollars in millions):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Current income tax expense (benefit)          
U.S. federal$(34) $6
 $(134)$(23) $(34) $6
U.S. state and local88
 78
 58
154
 88
 78
Non-U.S.512
 646
 275
671
 512
 646
Total current income tax expense566
 730
 199
802
 566
 730
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)          
U.S. federal1,049
 (28,965) 8
(581) 1,049
 (28,965)
U.S. state and local137
 (3,415) (28)(60) 137
 (3,415)
Non-U.S.375
 (3,181) (289)67
 375
 (3,181)
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)1,561
 (35,561) (309)(574) 1,561
 (35,561)
Total income tax expense (benefit)$2,127
 $(34,831) $(110)$228
 $2,127
 $(34,831)

Provisions are made for estimated U.S. and non-U.S. income taxes, less available tax credits and deductions, which may be incurred on the remittance of our basis differences in investments in foreign subsidiaries and corporate joint ventures not deemed to be indefinitely reinvested. Taxes have not been provided on basis differences in investments primarily as a result of earnings in foreign subsidiaries and corporate joint ventures which are deemed indefinitely reinvested of $2.6$3.0 billion and $1.42.6 billion at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013. Additional basis differences inrelated to investments in nonconsolidated China JVs exist of $4.1 billion at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 primarily related to fresh-start reporting. Quantification of the deferred tax liability, if any, associated with indefinitely reinvested basis differences is not practicable.

The following table summarizes a reconciliation of Income tax expense (benefit) compared with the amounts at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate (dollars in millions):

117
101



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Income tax expense (benefit) at U.S. federal statutory income tax rate$1,977
 $(10,590) $2,094
$753
 $1,977
 $(10,590)
State and local tax expense145
 254
 215
73
 145
 254
Non-U.S. income taxed at other than 35%(168) 908
 (172)(72) (168) 908
Foreign tax credit election change
 (1,075) 

 
 (1,075)
U.S. tax on Non-U.S. income543
 713
 (122)(8) 543
 713
Change in valuation allowance182
 (33,917) (2,386)(402) 182
 (33,917)
Change in tax laws146
 67
 (33)602
 146
 67
Research incentives(490) (68) (45)(279) (490) (68)
Gain on sale of New Delphi equity interests
 
 599
Goodwill impairment124
 8,705
 377
41
 124
 8,705
Settlements of prior year tax matters(473) 
 (56)(275) (473) 
VEBA contribution
 
 (476)
Realization of basis differences in affiliates(256) 
 
Foreign currency remeasurement(21) (36) 59
124
 (21) (36)
Pension contribution
 
 (127)
U.S. salaried pension plan settlement
 541
 

 
 541
Other adjustments162
 (333) (37)(73) 162
 (333)
Total income tax expense (benefit)$2,127
 $(34,831) $(110)$228
 $2,127
 $(34,831)

Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 reflect the effect of temporary differences between amounts of assets, liabilities and equity for financial reporting purposes and the bases of such assets, liabilities and equity as measured by tax laws, as well as tax loss and tax credit carryforwards. The following table summarizes the components of temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities (dollars in millions):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Deferred tax assets      
Postretirement benefits other than pensions$2,902
 $3,494
$2,958
 $2,902
Pension and other employee benefit plans5,469
 8,536
7,503
 5,469
Warranties, dealer and customer allowances, claims and discounts4,282
 4,277
5,512
 4,282
Property, plants and equipment2,464
 2,225
2,323
 2,464
Capitalized research expenditures7,179
 6,106
8,588
 7,179
Operating loss and tax credit carryforwards(a)19,342
 20,220
14,136
 19,342
Miscellaneous1,663
 3,443
3,286
 1,663
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowances43,301
 48,301
44,306
 43,301
Less: valuation allowances(10,823) (10,991)(9,659) (10,823)
Total deferred tax assets32,478
 37,310
34,647
 32,478
Deferred tax liabilities      
Intangible assets397
 724
416
 397
Net deferred tax assets$32,081
 $36,586
$34,231
 $32,081
_________
(a)
Includes operating loss and tax credit carryforwards of $16.3$8.9 billion expiring through 20332034 and $3.0$5.2 billion that may be carried forward indefinitely at December 31, 2013.2014.
    
At December 31, 2014 and 2013 valuation allowances against deferred tax assets were primarily in GME and South Korea business units and in the U.S. and Canada related primarily to capital loss tax attributes and state operating loss carryforwards.


118
102



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


At December 31, 2013 we retained2014 our European businesses had deferred tax asset valuation allowances of $10.8 billion against deferred tax assets primarily$4.9 billion. As a result of the changes in GMEour European operating structure and South Korea business units with lossesimproving financial performance in certain jurisdictions, we are experiencing positive evidence trends in certain operations. If these operations generate profits and taxable income in the U.S.future, it is reasonably possible our conclusion regarding the need for full valuation allowances could change, resulting in the reversal of significant portions of the valuation allowances. In the quarter in which significant valuation allowances are reversed, we will record a material tax benefit reflecting the reversal, which could result in a negative effective tax rate for both the quarter and Canada related primarily to capital loss tax attributes and state operating loss carryforwards.full year.

At December 31, 2012 as a result of sustained profitability in the U.S. and Canada evidenced by three years of earnings and the completion of our near- and medium-term business plans in the three months ended December 31, 2012 that forecast continuing profitability, we determined it was more likely than not future earnings will be sufficient to realize deferred tax assets in these two jurisdictions. Accordingly we reversed most of the U.S. and Canadian valuation allowances resulting in non-cash income tax benefits of $33.2 billion and $3.1 billion.

At December 31, 2011 as a result of sustained profitability in Australia, we released the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. The reduction in the valuation allowance resulted in a non-cash income tax benefit of $502 million. In Australia we have net operating loss carryforwards which are subject to meeting a "Same Business Test" requirement that we assess on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 2013 as a result of our plans to cease vehicle and engine manufacturing at Holden, we determined that it was more likely than not Holden would not realize a portion of the deferred tax assets and recorded a valuation allowance in the amount of $133 million.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The following table summarizes activity of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits (dollars in millions):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Beginning balance$2,745
 $2,370
 $5,169
$2,530
 $2,745
 $2,370
Additions to current year tax positions251
 112
 129
184
 251
 112
Additions to prior years' tax positions276
 512
 562
149
 276
 512
Reductions to prior years' tax positions(535) (141) (1,002)(603) (535) (141)
Reductions in tax positions due to lapse of statutory limitations(73) (34) (64)(164) (73) (34)
Settlements(132) (112) (2,399)(138) (132) (112)
Other(2) 38
 (25)(81) (2) 38
Ending balance$2,530
 $2,745
 $2,370
$1,877
 $2,530
 $2,745

At December 31, 2014 and 2013 there were $1.2 billion and 2012 there are $1.5$1.5 billion and $1.2 billion of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would favorably affect our effective tax rate in the future. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011 we recorded2012 income tax related interest expense (benefit) and penalties of $(25) million, $44 million and $(145) million. The interest and penalty benefit in the year ended December 31, 2011 was due primarily to remeasurements, settlements and statute expirations.were insignificant. At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 we had liabilities of $286$246 million and $222286 million for income tax related interest and penalties.

In Novemberthe year ended December 31, 2013 we remeasured a previously disclosed uncertain tax position and recorded a $473 million tax benefit that increased net operating loss carryforwards, reducing future taxable income.

In the year endedAt December 31, 2011 certain issues were resolved relating to uncertain tax positions in jurisdictions which had full valuation allowances. The resolution of these matters resulted in a $2.7 billion reduction to gross uncertain positions. No tax benefit was recognized with respect to these reductions because the entities were in full valuation allowance jurisdictions or the amounts were reserved in a prior period.

At December 31, 20132014 it is not possible to reasonably estimate the expected change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months.

Other Matters

Income tax returns are filed in multiple jurisdictions and are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. We have open tax years from 20052006 to 20132014 with various significant tax jurisdictions. These open years contain matters that could be subject to differing interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to the amount, character, timing or

119



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


inclusion of revenue and expenses or the sustainability of income tax credits for a given audit cycle. Given the global nature of our operations there is a risk that transfer pricing disputes may arise.

We have net operating loss carryforwards in Germany through November 30, 2009 that, as a result of reorganizations that took place in 2008 and 2009, were not recorded as deferred tax assets. Depending on the outcome of European court decisions these loss carryforwards may be available to reduce future taxable income in Germany.

In June 2011 we settled a Brazilian income tax matter for $241 million that was reserved and disclosed in a prior period.

In the U.S. we have continuing responsibility for Old GM's open tax years. Old GMGeneral Motors Corporation was liquidated on December 15, 2011. The Internal Revenue ServiceIRS has audited the returns through the liquidation date and, in January 2014, the audit of these returns was closed. The reduction to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits iswas not expected to be significant.

103



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



In January 2013 the U.S. Congress enacted federal income tax legislation including an extension of the research credit for tax years 2012 and 2013. As a result, in the year ended December 31, 2013 we recorded an income tax benefit related to the 2012 research credit of approximately $200 million.$200 million.

Note 19. Restructuring and Other Initiatives

We have previously executed various restructuring and other initiatives and we plan to execute additional initiatives in the future, if necessary, in order to align manufacturing capacity and other costs with prevailing global automotive production and to improve the utilization of remaining facilities. To the extent these programs involve voluntary separations, no liabilities are generally recorded until offers to employees are accepted. If employees are involuntarily terminated, a liability is generally recorded at the communication date. Related charges are recorded in Automotive cost of sales and Automotive selling, general and administrative expense.

The following table summarizes the reserves related to restructuring and other initiatives and charges by segment, including postemployment benefit reserves and charges (dollars in millions):
GMNA GME GMIO GMSA TotalGMNA GME GMIO GMSA Total
Balance at January 1, 2011(a)$1,135
 $664
 $3
 $
 $1,802
Balance at January 1, 2012$884
 $687
 $1
 $12
 $1,584
Additions, interest accretion and other104
 449
 
 81
 634
140
 254
 84
 92
 570
Payments(366) (395) (2) (68) (831)(304) (344) (46) (55) (749)
Revisions to estimates19
 (9) 
 
 10
Effect of foreign currency(8) (22) 
 (1) (31)
Balance at December 31, 2011(a)884
 687
 1
 12
 1,584
Additions, interest accretion and other140
 254
 84
 92
 570
Payments(304) (344) (46) (55) (749)
Revisions to estimates(78) (17) (1) (11) (107)
Effect of foreign currency11
 10
 1
 
 22
Revisions to estimates and effect of foreign currency(67) (7) 
 (11) (85)
Balance at December 31, 2012(a)653
 590
 39
 38
 1,320
653
 590
 39
 38
 1,320
Additions, interest accretion and other58
 202
 404
 50
 714
58
 202
 404
 50
 714
Payments(182) (299) (111) (68) (660)(182) (299) (111) (68) (660)
Revisions to estimates(16) (9) (3) (1) (29)
Effect of foreign currency(16) 19
 4
 (3) 4
Revisions to estimates and effect of foreign currency(32) 10
 1
 (4) (25)
Balance at December 31, 2013(a)$497
 $503
 $333
 $16
 $1,349
497
 503
 333
 16
 1,349
Additions, interest accretion and other42
 675
 213
 83
 1,013
Payments(96) (329) (342) (95) (862)
Revisions to estimates and effect of foreign currency16
 (98) (38) (2) (122)
Balance at December 31, 2014(a)$459
 $751
 $166
 $2
 $1,378
__________
(a)
The remaining cash payments related to these reserves for restructuring and other initiatives, including temporary layoff benefits of $353$354 million,, $356 $353 million and $376$356 million at December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 for GMNA, primarily relate to postemployment benefits to be paid.

Year Ended December 31, 2014

Restructuring and other initiatives at GME primarily related to the termination of all vehicle and transmission production at our Bochum, Germany facility. Through December 31, 2014 the active separation programs related to Germany had a total cost of $841 million and had affected a total of 3,560 employees. We completed the separation program at Bochum in December 2014.

Restructuring and other initiatives at GMIO primarily related to separation programs in Australia and Korea, the withdrawal of the Chevrolet brand from Europe and the cessation of manufacturing in Australia. Through December 31, 2014 the active separation programs related to Australia, Korea and Chevrolet Europe locations had a total cost of $514 million and affected a total of 3,380 employees. We expect to complete these programs in 2017 and incur additional restructuring and other charges of $270 million.

Restructuring and other initiatives at GMSA primarily related to completed separation programs in Brazil and an active separation program in Venezuela and through December 31, 2014 had a total cost of $169 million.

Year Ended December 31, 2013

Restructuring and other initiatives primarily related to: (1) cash severance incentive programs for skilled trade U.S. hourly employees and service cost for hourly layoff benefits at GMNA; (2) our plan to terminate all vehicle and transmission production

120
104



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


GMNA recorded charges, interest accretion and other and revisions to estimates primarily related to cash severance incentive programs for skilled trade U.S. hourly employees and service cost for hourly layoff benefits. Due to the expected closure of the Oshawa Consolidated Plant in December 2016, affected employees will be eligible for a voluntary restructuring separation incentive program in accordance with the existing collective bargaining agreement that provides cash and a car voucher. During 2013 some of the affected employees separated and the related costs were recorded.

GME recorded charges, interest accretion and other and revisions to estimates primarily related to our plan to terminate all vehicle and transmission production at our Bochum, Germany facility by the end of 2014. Through December 31, 2013 the active separation programs related to Germany2014 which had a total cost of $194 million and had affected a total of 450 employees. We expect to complete these programs in 2014 and incur additional charges of $650 million, which will affect an additional 3,300 employees.

GMIO recorded charges, interest accretion and other and revisions to estimates foremployees at GME through December 31, 2013; (3) separation programs in Australia and Korea and programs related to the withdrawal of the Chevrolet brand from Europe, described below. Through December 31, 2013 the active separation programs in GMIObelow, which had a total cost of $420 million and had affected a total of 4,100 employees. We expect to complete these programs in 2017employees at GMIO through December 31, 2013; and incur additional restructuring and other charges of $640 million.

GMSA recorded charges for(4) active separation programs in Brazil. Through December 31, 2013 the active separation programs related to Brazil which had a total cost of $103 million. at GMSA through December 31, 2013.

Year Ended December 31, 2012

GMNA recorded charges, interest accretionRestructuring and other and revisions to estimatesinitiatives primarily related toto: (1) our 2011 UAW labor agreement, and increased production capacity utilization in Canada. Our 2011 UAW labor agreementwhich included cash severance incentive programs whichthat were completed at March 31, 2012 for skilled trade U.S. hourly employees. A total of 1,400 skilled trade U.S. hourly employees participated in these programs at a total cost of $99 million which was recorded upon irrevocable acceptances by both parties. Substantially all of the program cost was recordedaffecting 1,400 skilled trade U.S. hourly employee participants and increased production capacity utilization in the three months ended March 31, 2012.

GME recorded charges, interest accretion and other and revisions to estimates for previously announcedCanada at GMNA; (2) separation and early retirement programs. Through December 31, 2012 the active separation programs related toin Germany and the United Kingdom that had a total cost of $400$400 million and had affected a total of 2,550 employees, of which $310$310 million related to a program initiated in Germany in 2010.

GMIO recorded charges, interest accretion and other related to2010 at GME; (3) voluntary separation programs primarily in Korea and Australia. Through December 31, 2012 these programsAustralia which had a total cost of $69$69 million which and affected 650 employees.

GMSA recorded charges of $87 million for employee separation costs related to employees at GMIO; and (4) a separation program in Brazil.

Year Ended December 31, 2011

GMNA recorded charges, interest accretion and other primarily related to special attrition programs for skilled trade U.S. hourly employees, service cost for hourly layoff benefits and Canadian restructuring activities.

GME recorded charges, interest accretion and other for separation programs primarily related to previously announced programs in Germany. Through December 31, 2011 these programs had a total costBrazil of $1.1 billion and affected a total of 6,700 employees and included the December 2010 closure of the Antwerp, Belgium facility.

GMSA recorded charges, interest accretion and other for separation programs primarily related to the voluntary separation program in Brazil implemented in the three months ended December 31, 2011. A total of 900 employees in Brazil participated in the separation program$87 million at a total cost of $74 million.GMSA.

Withdrawal of the Chevrolet Brand from Europe

In December 2013 we announced our plans to focus our marketing and product portfolio on our Opel and Vauxhall brands in Western and Central Europe and cease mainstream distribution of the Chevrolet brand in those markets in 2015. This decision impacts 1,200 Chevrolet dealers and distributors in the affected countries and 480 Chevrolet Europe employees. In the three months ended December 31, 2013 we recorded pre-tax charges of $636 million, net of noncontrolling interests of $124 million. These charges

121



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


included dealer restructuring costs of $233 million and employee severance costs of $30 million which are reflected in the table above. The remaining charges for intangible asset impairments of $264 million and sales incentive, inventory related and other costs of $233 million are not included in the table above. We may incur additional charges for exit costs of up to $300 million primarily through the first half of 2014. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on the intangible asset impairment charges.

Manufacturing Operations at Holden

In December 2013 we announced plans to cease vehicle and engine manufacturing and significantly reduce engineering operations at Holden by the end of 2017. Holden will continue to sell imported vehicles through its Holden dealer network and maintain its global design studio. This decision affects 2,900 employees from the Elizabeth vehicle manufacturing plant and Holden's Victorian workforce.at certain Holden facilities. In the three months ended December 31, 2013 we recorded pre-tax charges of $536 million in Automotive cost of sales consisting primarily of asset impairment charges of $477 million, including property, plant and equipment, which are not included in the table above. The remaining charges relate to exit-related costs, including certain employee severance related costs, of which $59 million which are included in the table above. We expect to incur additional charges through 2017 for incremental future cash payments of employee severance once negotiations of the amount are completed. Refer to Note 9 for additional information on the property, plant and equipment impairment charges.
      
Note 20. Interest Income and Other Non-Operating Income, net

The following table summarizes the components of Interest income and other non-operating income, net (dollars in millions):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Interest income$246
 $343
 $455
$211
 $246
 $343
Net gains (losses) on derivatives(13) (63) 41
48
 (13) (63)
Dividends and royalties97
 98
 153
101
 97
 98
Foreign currency transaction and translation gains (losses)(154) 16
 (48)
Foreign currency transaction and remeasurement gains (losses)378
 (154) 16
Gains (losses) on securities and other investments - realized and unrealized691
 (193) (9)13
 691
 (193)
Deferred income from technology agreements100
 114
 113

 100
 114
Other96
 530
 146
72
 96
 530
Total interest income and other non-operating income, net$1,063
 $845
 $851
$823
 $1,063
 $845


105



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


In December 2013 we sold our investment in Ally Financial common stock through a private offering for net proceeds of $880 million and recorded a gain of $483 million.

Note 21. Stockholders’ Equity and Noncontrolling Interests

Preferred and Common Stock

We have 2.0 billion shares of preferred stock and 5.0 billion shares of common stock authorized for issuance. We had 156 millionand 276 millionThere were no shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 20132014 and 2012. There were no156 million shares of Series BA Preferred Stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 100 millionshares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012.2013. We had 1.51.6 billion and 1.41.5 billion shares of common stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 20132014 and 2012.

Preferred Stock2013.

The following table summarizes significant features relating to our preferred and common stock (dollars in millions, except for per share amounts):
Liquidation Preference Per Share Dividend Rate Per Annum Dividends PaidLiquidation Preference Per Share Dividend Per Annum Dividends Paid
Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Series A Preferred Stock$25.00
 9.00% $1,370
 $621
 $621
$25.00
 9.00% $1,160
 $1,370
 $621
Series B Preferred Stock$50.00
 4.75% $237
 $238
 $243
$50.00
 4.75%   $237
 $238
Common stockN/A
 $1.20
 $1,928
 $
 $

Series A Preferred Stock

122



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)



Thethe remaining outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior with respect to liquidation preference and dividend rights to our common stock and Series B Preferred Stock and any other class or series of stock that we may issue. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our affairs, a holder of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to be paid, before any distribution or payment may be made to any holders of common stock or other series of stock, the liquidation amount and the amount of any accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, whether or not declared, prior to such distribution or payment date. On or after December 31, 2014, the Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed, in whole or in part, for cash at a price per share equal to the $25.00 per shareaggregate liquidation amount, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. Upon a redemption or purchaseincluding accumulated dividends, of any or all Series A Preferred Stock, the difference, if any, between the recorded amount of the Series A Preferred Stock being redeemed or purchased and the consideration paid would be recorded as a charge to$3.9 billion, which reduced Net income attributable to common stockholders.stockholders by $809 million and is included within dividends paid in the table above.

In September 2013 we purchased 120 million shares (or 43.5% of the total shares outstanding) of our Series A Preferred Stock held by the New VEBA at a price equal to 108.1% of the aggregate liquidation amount for $3.2 billion. We recorded a loss for the difference between the carrying amount of the Series A Preferred Stock purchased and the consideration paid, which reduced Net income attributable to common stockholders by $816 million. If all ofmillion and is included within dividends paid in the remaining Series A Preferred Stock were redeemed or purchased at its par value, Net income available to common stockholders would be reduced by a charge of $800 million.table above.

Series B Preferred Stock

On December 1, 2013 each of the 100 million shares of our Series B Preferred Stock outstanding automatically converted into 1.3736 shares of our common stock for a total of 137 million common shares. The number of shares of our common stock issued upon mandatory conversion of each share of Series B Preferred Stock was determined based on the average of the closing prices of our common stock over the 40 consecutive trading day period ended November 26, 2013.

Common Stock

Holders of our common stock are entitled to dividends at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors. However, the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock prohibit, subject to exceptions, the payment of dividends on ourNo common stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock arewere declared or paid in full.prior to 2014. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to our stockholders for a vote. The liquidation rights of holders of our common stock are secondary to the payment or provision for payment of all our debts and liabilities and to holders of our Series A Preferred Stock,preferred stock, if any such shares are then outstanding.

In September 2014 we repurchased 5 million shares of our outstanding common stock at a weighted-average price of $33.69 per share, to offset the dilution from the June 2014 grant of stock incentive awards under the 2014 Long-term Incentive Plan.

In December 2012 we purchased 200 million shares of our common stock from the USTU.S. Treasury at a price of $27.50$27.50 per share for a total of $5.5 billion.$5.5 billion. The purchase price represented a premium to the prior day's closing price of $25.49.$25.49. We allocated the purchase price between a direct reduction to shareholder'sstockholders' equity of $5.1$5.1 billion and a charge to Automotive selling, general and administrative expense of $402$402 million representing the premium. These shares were retired and returned to authorized but unissued status. In the year ended December 31, 2012 we issued 1.3 million shares of common stock for the settlement of restricted stock

106



GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


and salary stock awards and 400,000 shares for exercised warrants. Refer to Note 23 for additional information on our stock incentive plans.

Warrants

In connection with the 363 SaleJuly 2009 we issued two tranches of warrants, each to acquire 136 million shares of common stock, to MLCMotors Liquidation Company (MLC) which have all been distributed to creditors of Old GMGeneral Motors Corporation and to the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust by MLC and one tranche of warrants to acquire 46 million shares of common stock to the New VEBA. The first tranche of MLC warrants is exercisable at any time prior to July 10, 2016 at an exercise price of $10.00 per share and the second tranche of MLC warrants is exercisable at any time prior to July 10, 2019 at an exercise price of $18.33 per share. The New VEBA warrants, which were subsequently sold by the New VEBA, are exercisable at any time prior to December 31, 2015 at an exercise price of $42.31 per share. Upon exercise of the warrants, the shares issued will be included in the number of basic shares outstanding used in the computation of earnings per share. The number of shares of common stock underlying each of the warrants and the per share exercise price are subject to adjustment as a result of certain events, including stock splits, reverse stock splits and stock dividends. The outstanding balance of warrants was 293165 million and 313293 million at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table summarizes the components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss (dollars in millions):

123



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


          

107



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
 Pre-tax Amount Tax Expense (Benefit) Net Amount Pre-tax Amount Tax Expense(Benefit) Net Amount Pre-tax Amount Tax Expense (Benefit) Net Amount
Foreign currency translation adjustments                 
Balance at beginning of period$112
 $11
 $101
 $226
 $11
 $215
 $405
 $11
 $394
Other comprehensive income (loss)(722) 11
 (733) (103) 
 (103) (183) 
 (183)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest shares
 
 
 
 
 
 (6) 
 (6)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests18
 
 18
 (11) 
 (11) 10
 
 10
Balance at end of period$(592) $22
 $(614) $112
 $11
 $101
 $226
 $11
 $215
Cash flow hedging gains (losses), net                 
Balance at beginning of period$
 $
 $
 $2
 $
 $2
 $(23) $
 $(23)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification adjustment
 
 
 
 
 
 25
 
 25
Reclassification adjustment
 
 
 (2) 
 (2) 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 (2) 
 (2) 25
 
 25
Balance at end of period$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $2
 $
 $2
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities, net                 
Balance at beginning of period$63
 $22
 $41
 $1
 $5
 $(4) $
 $5
 $(5)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification adjustment133
 (6) 139
 (140) 22
 (162) 1
 
 1
Reclassification adjustment(185) (7) (178) 202
 (5) 207
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(52) (13) (39) 62
 17
 45
 1
 
 1
Balance at end of period$11
 $9
 $2
 $63
 $22
 $41
 $1
 $5
 $(4)
Defined benefit plans, net                 
Balance at beginning of period$(7,794) $400
 $(8,194) $(4,665) $1,409
 $(6,074) $2,298
 $1,413
 $885
Other comprehensive income before reclassification adjustment - prior service cost (credit)6
 (4) 10
 (53) (95) 42
 302
 1
 301
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification adjustment - actuarial gain (loss)8,673
 3,091
 5,582
 (3,180) (926) (2,254) (7,578) (10) (7,568)
Reclassification adjustment - prior service cost (credit)(a)(128) (44) (84) (125) (5) (120) (52) 
 (52)
Reclassification adjustment - actuarial gain (loss)(a)178
 (7) 185
 229
 17
 212
 366
 5
 361
Other comprehensive income (loss)8,729
 3,036
 5,693
 (3,129) (1,009) (2,120) (6,962) (4) (6,958)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest shares
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Balance at end of period$935
 $3,436
 $(2,501) $(7,794) $400
 $(8,194) $(4,665) $1,409
 $(6,074)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss                 
Balance at beginning of period$(7,619) $433
 $(8,052) $(4,436) $1,425
 $(5,861) $2,680
 $1,429
 $1,251
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification adjustment8,090
 3,092
 4,998
 (3,476) (999) (2,477) (7,433) (9) (7,424)
Reclassification adjustment(135) (58) (77) 304
 7
 297
 314
 5
 309
Other comprehensive income (loss)7,955
 3,034
 4,921
 (3,172) (992) (2,180) (7,119) (4) (7,115)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest shares
 
 
 
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests18
 
 18
 (11) 
 (11) 10
 
 10
Balance at end of period$354
 $3,467
 $(3,113) $(7,619) $433
 $(8,052) $(4,436) $1,425
 $(5,861)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments     
Balance at beginning of period$(614) $101
 $215
Other comprehensive loss(477) (722) (103)
Tax expense (benefit)(4) 11
 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(473) (733) (103)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax23
 18
 (11)
Balance at end of period$(1,064) $(614) $101
Unrealized Gains and Losses on Securities, Net     
Balance at beginning of period$2
 $41
 $(4)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification adjustment(2) 133
 (140)
Tax expense (benefit)(1) (6) 22
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification adjustment, net of tax(1) 139
 (162)
Reclassification adjustment(7) (185) 202
Tax benefit(3) (7) (5)
Reclassification adjustment, net of tax(4) (178) 207
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(5) (39) 45
Balance at end of period$(3) $2
 $41
Defined Benefit Plans, Net     
Balance at beginning of period$(2,501) $(8,194) $(6,074)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification adjustment - prior service cost or credit(20) 6
 (53)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification adjustment - actuarial gains or losses(6,457) 8,673
 (3,180)
Tax expense (benefit)(1,854) 3,087
 (1,021)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification adjustment, net of tax(4,623) 5,592
 (2,212)
Reclassification adjustment - prior service cost or credit(a)22
 (128) (125)
Reclassification adjustment - actuarial gains or losses(a)76
 178
 229
Tax expense (benefit)(a)(20) (51) 12
Reclassification adjustment, net of tax(a)118
 101
 92
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(4,505) 5,693
 (2,120)
Balance at end of period$(7,006) $(2,501) $(8,194)
__________
(a)
(a)
Included in the computation of net periodic pension and OPEB (income) expense. Refer to Note 15 for additional information.

Note 22. Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing Net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding in the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive securities that are outstanding.

The following table summarizes basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except for per share amounts):

124
108



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


The following table summarizes basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except for per share amounts):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Basic earnings per share          
Net income attributable to stockholders$5,346
 $6,188
 $9,190
$3,949
 $5,346
 $6,188
Less: cumulative dividends on preferred stock and charge related to purchase of preferred stock(a)(1,576) (859) (859)
Less: cumulative dividends on preferred stock and charge related to redemption and purchase of preferred stock(a)(1,145) (1,576) (859)
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to Series B Preferred Stock participating security
 (470) (746)
 
 (470)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,770
 $4,859
 $7,585
$2,804
 $3,770
 $4,859
          
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic1,393
 1,566
 1,536
1,605
 1,393
 1,566
Basic earnings per common share$2.71
 $3.10
 $4.94
$1.75
 $2.71
 $3.10
Diluted earnings per share          
Net income attributable to stockholders$5,346
 $6,188
 $9,190
$3,949
 $5,346
 $6,188
Add: preferred dividends to holders of Series B Preferred Stock218
 
 


 218
 
Less: cumulative dividends on preferred stock and charge related to purchase of preferred stock(a)(1,576) (859) (859)
Less: cumulative dividends on preferred stock and charge related to redemption and purchase of preferred stock(a)(1,145) (1,576) (859)
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to Series B Preferred Stock participating security
 (442) (693)

 
 (442)
Less: earnings adjustment for dilutive stock compensation(18)    
Net income attributable to common stockholders$3,988
 $4,887
 $7,638
$2,786
 $3,988
 $4,887
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted          
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic1,393
 1,566
 1,536
1,605
 1,393
 1,566
Dilutive effect of warrants146
 104
 130
Dilutive effect of warrants and RSUs82
 149
 109
Dilutive effect of conversion of Series B Preferred Stock134
 
 


 134
 
Dilutive effect of RSUs3
 5
 2
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted1,676
 1,675
 1,668
1,687
 1,676
 1,675
          
Diluted earnings per common share$2.38
 $2.92
 $4.58
$1.65
 $2.38
 $2.92
__________
(a)
Includes earned but undeclared dividends of $15$15 million, $26 and $26 million and $26 million on our Series A Preferred Stock in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and 2011 and $20$20 million on our Series B Preferred Stock in the yearsyear ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
2012.

HoldersPrior to the December 2013 conversion to common shares, holders of the Series B Preferred Stock had a right to participate in our undistributed earnings because a dividend, if declared, would result in a transfer of value to the holder through an adjustment to the fixed conversion ratios throughaccording to various anti-dilution provisions. Based on the nature of the Series B Preferred Stock and the nature of these anti-dilution provisions, we concluded that the Series B Preferred Stock was a participating security and, as such, requires the application of the more dilutive of the two-class or if-converted method to calculate earnings per share when the applicable market value of our common stock is below or above the range of $33.00 to $39.60 per common share. For purposes of calculating earnings per share, the applicable market value is calculated as the average of the closing prices of our common stock over the 40 consecutive trading day period ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the date of our mandatory conversion in 2013 or the date of our financial statements for 2012 and 2011. The calculation of the applicable market value is applied to the full year, irrespective of the applicable market value computed during the prior quarters of the current year.

On the mandatory conversion date of our Series B Preferred Stock, December 1, 2013, the applicable market value of our common stock was within the range of $33.00 to $39.60 per common share and, as such, we applied the if-converted method for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share in the year ended December 31, 2013. InThe impact on diluted earnings per share was an increase of $0.13 in the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 using the if-converted as compared to the two-class method.
In the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we were required to use the two-class method for calculating earnings per share as the applicable market value of our common stock was below $33.00 per common share. Under the two-class method for computing earnings per share, undistributed earnings are allocated to common stock and the Series B Preferred Stock according to their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings, as if all the earnings for the period had been distributed. This allocation to the Series B Preferred Stock holders reduced Net income attributable to common stockholders, resulting in a lower basic and dilutivediluted earnings per share amount. The application of the two-class method resulted in an allocation of undistributed earnings to our Series B Preferred Stock holders and, accordingly, 152 million common stock equivalents from the assumed conversion of

125
109



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


The impact on diluted earnings per share was an increase of $0.13 in the year ended December 31, 2013 using the if-converted as compared to the two-class method. Our calculation of earnings per share varied from period to period depending on whether the two-class or if-converted method was required.

The application of the two-class method resulted in an allocation of undistributed earnings to our Series B Preferred Stock holders and, accordingly, 152 million common stock equivalents from the assumed conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock are not considered outstanding for purposes of determining the weighted-average common shares outstanding in the computation of diluted earnings per share for December 31, 2012 and 2011.2012.

In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 warrants to purchase 46 million shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the warrants' exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

Note 23. Stock Incentive Plans

Our stockStock incentive plansplan awards outstanding at December 31, 2014 consist of awards granted under the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Salary Stock Plan. BothThe 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan was approved by stockholders in June 2014 and replaced the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan and Salary Stock Plan. These plans are administered by the Executive Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. The aggregate number of shares with respect to which awards may be granted under these amended plansthe 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan shall not exceed 75 million.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

We granted 7 million, 7 million and 5 million RSUs in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. These awards granted either cliff vest or ratably vest generally over a three-year service period, as defined in the terms of each award. Our policy is to issue new shares upon settlement of RSUs.

The 2013 awards granted to the Top 25 highest compensated employees will settle on the second and third anniversary dates of grant in 25% increments consistent with the terms of60 million. In January 2014 we amended the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The awards forPlan and the Next 75 highest compensated employees will settle on the second and third anniversary dates of grant. The awards for the non-Top 100 highest compensated employees will settle on the first, second and third anniversary dates of grant. Vesting and subsequent settlement will generally occur based upon employment at the end of each specified service period.

The 2012 awards granted to the Top 25 highest compensated employees will settle on the second and third anniversary dates of grant in 25% increments consistent with the terms of the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The awards for the non-Top 25 highest compensated employees will vest and settle on the second and third anniversary dates of grant. Vesting and subsequent settlement will generally occur based upon employment at the end of each specified service period.

The 2011 awards granted to the Top 25 highest compensated employees will settle three years from the grant date in 25% increments consistent with the terms of the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The awards for the Next 75 highest compensated employees will settle either: (1) three years from the date of grant; or (2) on the first and third anniversary dates of grant. The awards to the non-Top 100 highest compensated employees will settle on the first, second and third anniversary dates of grant. Vesting and subsequent settlement will generally occur based upon employment at the end of each specified service period.

Retirement eligible participants that are non-Top 100 highest compensated employees who retire in the first twelve months following the grant will retain and vest a pro-rata portion of RSUs earned and those who retire after the first anniversary of the grant will retain and vest the full RSU grant. The vested award will be payable on the settlement date.

The plan was amended in January 2014Salary Stock Plan to provide cash payment, on a going forward basis, of dividend equivalents upon settlement to active employees and certain former employees with outstanding awards as of the amendment date.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

We grant RSUs and PSUs under our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan and, prior to our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, RSUs under our 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Shares awarded under the plans are subject to forfeiture if the participant leaves the company for reasons other than those permitted under the plans such as retirement, death or disability. Our policy is to issue new shares upon settlement of RSUs and PSUs.

We granted 8 million, 7 million and 7 million RSUs in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. These awards either cliff vest or ratably vest generally over a three-year service period, as defined in the terms of each award. Vesting and subsequent settlement will generally occur based upon employment at the end of each specified service period.

We issued 4 million PSUs, equal to the targeted number of shares, in the year ended December 31, 2014. The ultimate number of shares earned will be determined at the end of the specified performance period, which is three years, based on performance criteria determined by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the time of award. The number of shares earned may equal, exceed or be less than the targeted number of shares depending on whether the performance criteria are met, surpassed or not met. PSU awards generally vest and settle at the end of a three-year period.

Salary Stock Plan

In the years ended December 31, 2013, and 2012 and 2011 a portion of each participant's salary was accrued on each salary payment date and converted to RSUs on a quarterly basis. In March 2012 we amended the plan to provide for cash settlement of awards and reclassified $97 million from Additional paid-in capital to Accrued liabilities and Other liabilities and deferred income taxes. Prior to this amendment it was our policy to issue new shares upon settlement of these awards. In June 2013 we amended the plan to provide for cash or share settlement of awards based on election by the participant. The plan was amendedliability for these awards continues to be remeasured to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

RSUs and PSUs

The following table summarizes information about the RSUs and PSUs under our stock incentive plans (units in January 2014 to provide cash payment, on a going forward basis, of dividend equivalents upon settlement to active employees with outstandingmillions):

126
110



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


awards as of the amendment date. The liability for these awards continues to be remeasured to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

RSUs

The following table summarizes information about the RSUs under our stock incentive plans (RSUs in millions):
 Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years
RSUs outstanding at January 1, 201326.9
 $23.06
 0.7
Granted8.9
 $29.05
  
Settled(16.0) $20.60
  
Forfeited or expired(1.2) $27.20
  
RSUs outstanding at December 31, 201318.6
 $27.76
 1.2
      
RSUs unvested and expected to vest at December 31, 20139.2
 $27.94
 1.6
RSUs vested and payable at December 31, 20138.8
 $27.61
 
RSUs granted in the year ended December 31, 2012  $25.10
  
RSUs granted in the year ended December 31, 2011  $31.18
  
 Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years
Units outstanding at January 1, 201418.6
 $27.76
 1.2
Granted12.1
 $35.31
  
Settled(9.3) $27.85
  
Forfeited or expired(1.5) $30.39
  
Units outstanding at December 31, 201419.9
 $32.11
 1.3
      
Units unvested and expected to vest at December 31, 201412.7
 $32.91
 1.5
Units vested and payable at December 31, 20146.7
 $30.49
 
Units granted in the year ended December 31, 2013  $29.05
  
Units granted in the year ended December 31, 2012  $25.10
  

The following table summarizes compensation expense recorded for our stock incentive plans (dollars in millions):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Compensation expense$311
 $302
 $233
$245
 $311
 $302
Income tax benefit$100
 $100
 $
$81
 $100
 $100

At December 31, 20132014 the total unrecognized compensation expense for nonvested equity awards granted was $149 million.$247 million. This expense is expected to be recorded over a weighted-average period of 1.61.5 years. The total fair value of RSUs and PSUs vested in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 20112012 was $342$221 million,, $141 $342 million and $105 million.$141 million. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 total payments for 2.4 million, 3.1 million, and 1.6 million and 456,000 RSUs settled under stock incentive plans were $94$85 million,, $36 $94 million and $14 million.$36 million.

Note 24. Supplementary Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following tables summarize supplementary quarterly financial information (dollars in millions, except per share amounts):
 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
2014       
Total net sales and revenue$37,408
 $39,649
 $39,255
 $39,617
Automotive gross margin$2,188
 $2,611
 $3,945
 $4,266
Net income$280
 $287
 $1,442
 $2,009
Net income attributable to stockholders$213
 $278
 $1,471
 $1,987
Earnings per share, basic$0.08
 $0.12
 $0.86
 $0.69
Earnings per share, diluted$0.06
 $0.11
 $0.81
 $0.66
 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
2013       
Total net sales and revenue$36,884
 $39,075
 $38,983
 $40,485
Automotive gross margin$3,727
 $4,416
 $4,954
 $4,070
Net income$1,185
 $1,388
 $1,705
 $1,053
Net income attributable to stockholders$1,175
 $1,414
 $1,717
 $1,040
Earnings per share, basic$0.63
 $0.87
 $0.50
 $0.64
Earnings per share, diluted$0.58
 $0.75
 $0.45
 $0.57

The three months ended December 31, 2014 included the following on a pre-tax basis:

127
111



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Gain on extinguishment of debt of $207 million related to unsecured debt in Brazil in GMSA.
 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
2012       
Total net sales and revenue$37,759
 $37,614
 $37,576
 $39,307
Automotive gross margin$4,418
 $4,449
 $4,327
 $(3,135)
Net income$1,350
 $1,901
 $1,854
 $1,031
Net income attributable to stockholders$1,315
 $1,846
 $1,833
 $1,194
Earnings per share, basic$0.64
 $0.95
 $0.94
 $0.58
Earnings per share, diluted$0.60
 $0.90
 $0.89
 $0.54
Asset impairment charges of $158 million related to our Thailand subsidiary in GMIO.

PriorThe three months ended September 30, 2014 included asset impairment charges of $194 million related to theRussian subsidiaries in GME on a pre-tax basis.

The three months ended June 30, 2013 we used2014 included the two-class methodfollowing on a pre-tax basis:

Recall campaign and courtesy transportation charges of $1.1 billion in GMNA.
Catch-up adjustment of $874 million related to change in estimate of recall campaigns in GMNA.
Charge of $400 million for calculating earnings per share because Series B Preferred Stock wasignition switch recall compensation program in Corporate.

The three months ended March 31, 2014 included the following on a participating security.pre-tax basis:

Recall campaign and courtesy transportation charges of $1.3 billion in GMNA.
Charge of $419 million for the Venezuela currency devaluation in GMSA.

The three months ended December 31, 2013 included the following on a pre-tax (except tax matters) and pre-noncontrolling interests basis:

Benefit from the release of GM Korea wage litigation accruals of $846 million in GMIO.
Property and intangible assetAsset impairment charges of $805 million at Holden and GM India in GMIO.
Charges of $745 million related to our plans to cease mainstream distribution of Chevrolet brand in Europe in GMIO.
Gain on sale of equity investment in Ally Financial of $483 million in Corporate.
Goodwill impairment charges of $481 million in GMIO.
Tax benefit of $473 million from remeasurement of uncertain tax position in Corporate.
Gain on sale of equity investment in PSA of $152 million in GME.

The three months ended March 31,June 30, 2013 included the followingloss on extinguishment of debt of $240 million related to early redemption of preferred shares at GM Korea in GMIO on a pre-tax and pre-noncontrolling interests basis:basis.

ChargeThe three months ended March 31, 2013 included a charge of $162 million in GMSA for the Venezuela currency devaluation.

The three months ended December 31, 2012 included the followingdevaluation on a pre-tax and pre-noncontrolling interests basis:

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance release of $36.3 billion inbasis. In the U.S. and Canada.
Goodwill impairment charges of $26.5 billion in GMNA and GMIO.
Property, plant and equipment impairment charges of $3.7 billion in GME.
Pension settlement charge of $2.6 billion in GMNA.
Intangible asset impairment charges of $1.8 billion in GME.
Charge of $525 million for GM Korea hourly wage litigation.
Charge of $402 million which represents the premium paid to purchase our common stock from the UST in Corporate.

The three months ended March 31, 2012 included2013 we used the following ontwo-class method for calculating earnings per share because Series B Preferred Stock was a pre-tax and pre-noncontrolling interests basis:

Goodwill impairment charges of $617 million in GMIO and GME.
participating security.

Note 25. Segment Reporting

We analyze the results of our business through our fivethe following segments: GMNA, GME, GMIO, GMSA and GM Financial. The chief operating decision maker evaluates the operating results and performance of our automotive segments through Income (loss)income before interest and income taxes, as adjusted for additional amounts, which areis presented net of noncontrolling interests, and

128



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


interests. The chief operating decision maker evaluates GM Financial through income before income taxes.taxes-adjusted because he/she believes interest income and interest expense are part of operating results when assessing and measuring the operational and financial performance of the segment. Each segment has a manager responsible for executing our strategies. Our automotive manufacturing operations are integrated within the segments, benefit from broad-based trade agreements and are subject to regulatory requirements, such as Corporate Average Fuel EconomyCAFE regulations. While not all vehicles within a segment are individually profitable on a fully allocated cost basis, those vehicles are needed in our product mix in order to attract customers to dealer showrooms and to maintain sales volumes for other, more profitable vehicles. Because of these and other factors, we do not manage our business on an individual brand or vehicle basis.

In the three months ended March 31, 2013 we changed our managerial and financial reporting structure to measure our reportable segments revenue and profitability based on the geographic area in which we sell vehicles to third party customers. We record certain transactions between our automotive and finance segments as intersegment activity and eliminate them in consolidation. The new reporting structure provides clearer profit and revenue visibility across geographic areas and identifies our profitability at the point of sale. Previously, it was based on the geographic area in which the vehicles originated and our managerial and financial reporting structure included intercompany sales and cost of sales in our segment results. Certain expenses such as engineering, warranty, recall campaigns and selling, general and administrative are allocated to the geographic area in which the vehicle is sold to third party customers. We have retrospectively revised the segment presentation for all periods presented.

Substantially all of the cars, trucks and parts produced are marketed through retail dealers in North America, and through distributors and dealers outside of North America, the substantial majority of which are independently owned.


112



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


In addition to the products sold to dealers for consumer retail sales, cars and trucks are also sold to fleet customers, including daily rental car companies, commercial fleet customers, leasing companies and governments. Sales to fleet customers are completed through the network of dealers and in some cases sold directly to fleet customers. Retail and fleet customers can obtain a wide range of aftersale vehicle services and products through the dealer network, such as maintenance, light repairs, collision repairs, vehicle accessories and extended service warranties.

GMNA primarily meets the demands of customers in North America with vehicles developed, manufactured and/or marketed under the following four brands:
•     Buick•     Cadillac•     Chevrolet•     GMC

Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC brands. The demands of customers outside of North America are primarily met with vehicles developed, manufactured and/or marketed under the following brands:
•     Buick•     Chevrolet•     Holden•     Vauxhall
•     Cadillac•     GMC•     Opel

At December 31, 2013 weBuick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, Holden, Opel and Vauxhall brands. We also had equity ownership stakes directly or indirectly in entities through various regional subsidiaries, primarily in Asia thatAsia. These companies design, manufacture and market vehicles under the following brands:
•     Alpheon•     Buick•     Chevrolet•     Wuling
•     Baojun•     Cadillac•     Jiefang
Alpheon, Baojun, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Jiefang and Wuling brands.

Our automotive operations' interest income and interest expense are recorded centrally in Corporate. Corporate assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and intercompany balances. All intersegment balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The following tables summarize key financial information by segment (dollars in millions):
 At and For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Eliminations Total Automotive GM Financial Eliminations Total
Sales                   
External customers$101,199
 $22,235
 $14,392
 $13,115
 $151
   $151,092
 $
 $
 $151,092
GM Financial revenue
 
 
 
 
   
 4,854
 (17) 4,837
Total net sales and revenue$101,199
 $22,235
 $14,392
 $13,115
 $151
   $151,092
 $4,854
 $(17) $155,929
                    
Income (loss) before interest and taxes-adjusted$6,603
 $(1,369) $1,222
 $(180) $(580)   $5,696
 $803
 $(5) $6,494
Adjustments(a)$(975) $(245) $(180) $(539) $(400)   $(2,339) $12
 $
 (2,327)
Automotive interest income                  211
Automotive interest expense                  (403)
Gain on extinguishment of debt                  202
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests                  69
Income before income taxes                  $4,246
                    
Equity in net assets of nonconsolidated affiliates$88
 $6
 $8,254
 $2
 $
 $
 $8,350
 $
 $
 $8,350
Total assets$92,864
 $10,528
 $22,949
 $10,066
 $24,368
 $(29,041) $131,734
 $47,861
 $(1,918) $177,677
Expenditures for property$4,985
 $887
 $681
 $359
 $127
 $
 $7,039
 $52
 $
 $7,091
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets$4,376
 $627
 $740
 $386
 $75
 $(4) $6,200
 $918
 $
 $7,118
Equity income (loss)$19
 $(45) $2,120
 $
 $
 $
 $2,094
 $
 $
 $2,094
__________
(a)Consists of a catch-up adjustment related to the change in estimate for recall campaigns of $874 million and charges related to flood damage, net of insurance recoveries, of $101 million in GMNA; asset impairment charges of $245 million related to our Russian subsidiaries in GME; asset impairment charges of $158 million related to our Thailand subsidiary in GMIO; Venezuela currency devaluation charges of $419 million and Goodwill impairment charges of $120 million in GMSA; a charge related to the ignition switch recall compensation program of $400 million in Corporate; and other of $10 million.


129
113



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


At and For the Year Ended December 31, 2013At and For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Eliminations Total Automotive GM Financial Eliminations TotalGMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Eliminations Total Automotive GM Financial Eliminations Total
Sales                                      
External customers$95,091
 $20,110
 $20,263
 $16,478
 $150
   $152,092
 $
 $
 $152,092
$95,091
 $21,962
 $18,411
 $16,478
 $150
   $152,092
 $
 $
 $152,092
GM Financial revenue
 
 
 
 
   
 3,344
 (9) 3,335

 
 
 
 
   
 3,344
 (9) 3,335
Intersegment8
 
 
 
 
   8
 
 (8) 
8
 
 
 
 
   8
 
 (8) 
Total net sales and revenue$95,099
 $20,110
 $20,263
 $16,478
 $150
   $152,100
 $3,344
 $(17) $155,427
$95,099
 $21,962
 $18,411
 $16,478
 $150
   $152,100
 $3,344
 $(17) $155,427
                                      
Income (loss) before interest and taxes-adjusted$7,461
 $(844) $1,230
 $327
 $(494)   $7,680
 $898
 $
 $8,578
$7,461
 $(869) $1,255
 $327
 $(494)   $7,680
 $898
 $
 $8,578
Adjustments(a)$(100) $153
 $(1,169) $(157) 483
   $(790) (15) $
 (805)$(100) $153
 $(1,169) $(157) $483
   $(790) $(15) $
 (805)
Corporate interest income        249
       $(3) 246
Automotive interest income                  246
Automotive interest expense        338
       $(4) 334
                  (334)
Loss on extinguishment of debt        212
     
   212
                  (212)
Income (loss) before income taxes        (312)     883
   7,473
Income tax expense        1,826
     300
 $1
 2,127
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders        $(2,138)     $583
   $5,346
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests                  (15)
Income before income taxes                  $7,458
                                      
Equity in net assets of nonconsolidated affiliates$74
 $7
 $8,009
 $4
 $
 $
 $8,094
 $
 $
 $8,094
$74
 $95
 $7,921
 $4
 $
 $
 $8,094
 $
 $
 $8,094
Total assets$87,978
 $10,341
 $23,425
 $11,488
 $26,460
 $(29,642) $130,050
 $38,084
 $(1,790) $166,344
$87,978
 $11,276
 $22,100
 $11,488
 $26,460
 $(29,252) $130,050
 $38,084
 $(1,790) $166,344
Expenditures for property$5,466
 $770
 $772
 $444
 $92
 $5
 $7,549
 $16
 $
 $7,565
$5,466
 $818
 $724
 $444
 $92
 $5
 $7,549
 $16
 $
 $7,565
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets$4,216
 $406
 $1,806
 $522
 $63
 $(1) $7,012
 $498
 $(10) $7,500
$4,216
 $426
 $1,786
 $522
 $63
 $(1) $7,012
 $498
 $(10) $7,500
Equity income and gain on investments$15
 $
 $1,794
 $1
 $
 $
 $1,810
 $
 $
 $1,810
Equity income$15
 $34
 $1,760
 $1
 $
 $
 $1,810
 $
 $
 $1,810
__________
(a)
Consists of pension settlement charges of $56 million and charges related to PSA product development agreement of $49 million in GMNA; gain on sale of equity investment in PSA of $152 million in GME; property and intangible asset impairment charges of $774 million, costs related to the withdrawal of the Chevrolet brand in Europe of $621 million and goodwill impairment charges of $442 million, partially offset by GM Korea hourly wage litigation of $577 million and acquisition of GM Korea preferred shares of $67 million in GMIO, all net of noncontrolling interests; Venezuela currency devaluation charges of $162 million in GMSA; gain on sale of equity investment in Ally Financial of $483 million in Corporate; costs related to the withdrawal of the Chevrolet brand in Europe of $15 million in GM Financial; and income related to various insurance recoveries of $35 million.

 At and For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
 GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Eliminations Total Automotive GM Financial Eliminations Total
Sales                   
External customers$89,912
 $23,055
 $20,588
 $16,700
 $40
   $150,295
 $
 $
 $150,295
GM Financial revenue
 
 
 
 
   
 1,961
 
 1,961
Intersegment(2) 
 
 
 
   (2) 
 2
 
Total net sales and revenue$89,910
 $23,055
 $20,588
 $16,700
 $40
   $150,293
 $1,961
 $2
 $152,256
                    
Income (loss) before interest and taxes-adjusted$6,470
 $(1,949) $2,538
 $457
 $(400)   $7,116
 $744
 $(1) $7,859
Adjustments(a)$(29,052) $(6,389) $(290) $27
 $(402)   $(36,106) $
 $
 (36,106)
Automotive interest income                  343
Automotive interest expense                  (489)
Loss on extinguishment of debt                  (250)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests                  (52)
Loss before income taxes                  $(28,695)
                    
Equity in net assets of nonconsolidated affiliates$65
 $159
 $6,656
 $3
 $
 $
 $6,883
 $
 $
 $6,883
Total assets$87,100
 $10,475
 $24,147
 $11,958
 $16,991
 $(16,927) $133,744
 $16,368
 $(690) $149,422
Expenditures for property$4,766
 $1,075
 $1,185
 $956
 $77
 $(4) $8,055
 $13
 $
 $8,068
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets$3,663
 $6,584
 $624
 $483
 $49
 $(1) $11,402
 $225
 $(10) $11,617
Equity income$9
 $35
 $1,517
 $1
 $
 $
 $1,562
 $
 $
 $1,562
Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets(b)$
 $
 $
 $
 $(36,261) $
 $(36,261) $(103) $
 $(36,364)
__________
(a)Consists primarily of Goodwill impairment charges of $26.4 billion, pension settlement charges of $2.7 billion and income related to various insurance recoveries of $9 million in GMNA; property impairment charges of $3.7 billion, intangible assets impairment charges of $1.8 billion, goodwill impairment charges of $590 million, impairment charges

130
114



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


related to investment in PSA of $220 million, a charge of $119 million to record General Motors Strasbourg S.A.S. assets and liabilities to estimated fair value and income related to various insurance recoveries of $9 million in GME; GM Korea hourly wage litigation charge of $336 million, goodwill impairment charges of $132 million, which are presented net of noncontrolling interests, income related to various insurance recoveries of $110 million and income related to redemption of the GM Korea mandatorily redeemable preferred shares of $68 million in GMIO; income related to various insurance recoveries of $27 million in GMSA; and a charge of $402 million which represents the premium paid to purchase our common stock from the UST in Corporate.
 At and For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
 GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Eliminations Total Automotive GM Financial Eliminations Total
Sales                   
External customers$89,912
 $20,689
 $22,954
 $16,700
 $40
   $150,295
 $
 $
 $150,295
GM Financial revenue
 
 
 
 
   
 1,961
 
 1,961
Intersegment(2) 
 
 
 
   (2) 
 2
 
Total net sales and revenue$89,910
 $20,689
 $22,954
 $16,700
 $40
   $150,293
 $1,961
 $2
 $152,256
                    
Income (loss) before interest and taxes-adjusted$6,470
 $(1,939) $2,528
 $457
 $(400)   $7,116
 $744
 $(1) $7,859
Adjustments(a)$(29,052) $(6,391) $(288) $27
 (402)   $(36,106) 
 $
 (36,106)
Corporate interest income        343
         343
Automotive interest expense        489
         489
Loss on extinguishment of debt        250
     
   250
Income (loss) before income taxes        (1,198)     744
   (28,643)
Income tax expense (benefit)        (35,007)     177
 $(1) (34,831)
Net income attributable to stockholders        $33,809
     $567
   $6,188
                    
Equity in net assets of nonconsolidated affiliates$65
 $51
 $6,764
 $3
 $
 $
 $6,883
 $
 $
 $6,883
Total assets$87,100
 $9,669
 $25,032
 $11,958
 $16,991
 $(17,006) $133,744
 $16,368
 $(690) $149,422
Expenditures for property$4,766
 $1,035
 $1,225
 $956
 $77
 $(4) $8,055
 $13
 $
 $8,068
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets$3,663
 $6,570
 $638
 $483
 $49
 $(1) $11,402
 $225
 $(10) $11,617
Equity income and gain on investments$9
 $
 $1,552
 $1
 $
 $
 $1,562
 $
 $
 $1,562
Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets(b)$
 $
 $
 $
 $(36,261) $
 $(36,261) $(103) $
 $(36,364)
__________
(a)
Consists of Goodwill impairment charges of $26.4 billion, pension settlement charges of $2.7 billion and income related to various insurance recoveries of $9 million in GMNA; property impairment charges of $3.7 billion, intangible assets impairment charges of $1.8 billion, goodwill impairment charges of $590 million, impairment charges related to investment in PSA of $220 million, a charge of $119 million to record General Motors Strasbourg S.A.S. assets and liabilities to estimated fair value and income related to various insurance recoveries of $7 million in GME; GM Korea hourly wage litigation charge of $336 million, goodwill impairment charges of $132 million, which are presented net of noncontrolling interests, income related to various insurance recoveries of $112 million and income related to redemption of the GM Korea mandatorily redeemable preferred shares of $68 million in GMIO; income related to various insurance recoveries of $27 million in GMSA; and a charge of $402 million which represents the premium paid to purchase our common stock from the UST in Corporate.
(b)
Includes valuation allowance releases of $36.5$36.5 billion net of the establishment of new valuation allowances of $0.1 billion. Amounts exclude changes related to income tax expense (benefits) in jurisdictions with a full valuation allowance throughout the period.





131



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


 For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
 GMNA GME GMIO GMSA Corporate Eliminations Total Automotive GM Financial Eliminations Total
Sales                   
External customers$85,988
 $25,154
 $21,031
 $16,632
 $61
   $148,866
 $
 $
 $148,866
GM Financial revenue
 
 
 
 
   
 1,410
 
 1,410
Intersegment3
 
 
 
 
   3
 
 (3) 
Total net sales and revenue$85,991
 $25,154
 $21,031
 $16,632
 $61
   $148,869
 $1,410
 $(3) $150,276
                    
Income (loss) before interest and taxes-adjusted$6,779
 $(1,041) $2,232
 $158
 $(446)   $7,682
 $622
 $
 $8,304
Adjustments(a)$2,394
 $(1,016) $(364) $63
 (216)   $861
 
 $
 861
Corporate interest income        455
         455
Automotive interest expense        540
         540
Income (loss) before income taxes        (747)     622
   9,080
Income tax expense (benefit)        (295)     185
   (110)
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders        $(452)     $437
   $9,190
                    
Equity in net assets of nonconsolidated affiliates$60
 $50
 $6,678
 $2
 $
 $
 $6,790
 $
 $
 $6,790
Total assets$83,528
 $15,777
 $22,130
 $11,514
 $30,244
 $(31,333) $131,860
 $13,112
 $(369) $144,603
Expenditures for property$3,404
 $1,016
 $907
 $880
 $44
 $(10) $6,241
 $8
 $
 $6,249
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets$3,693
 $1,371
 $491
 $454
 $50
 $(1) $6,058
 $85
 $(2) $6,141
Equity income and gain on investments(b)$1,733
 $
 $1,458
 $1
 $
 $
 $3,192
 $
 $
 $3,192
Reversal of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets(c)$
 $
 $
 $
 $(488) $
 $(488) $
 $
 $(488)
__________
(a)
Consists of the gain on sale of our New Delphi Class A Membership Interests of $1.6 billion and the gain related to the HCT settlement of $749 million in GMNA; Goodwill impairment charges of $1.0 billion in GME; Goodwill impairment charges of $258 million and charges related to GM India of $106 million in GMIO; a gain on extinguishment of debt of $63 million in GMSA; and impairment charges of $555 million related to Ally Financial common stock and a gain on the sale of Ally Financial preferred stock of $339 million in Corporate.
(b)
Includes a gain of $1.6 billion recorded on the sale of our New Delphi Class A Membership Interests. Refer to Note 8 for additional information on the sale of New Delphi.
(c)$0.1 billion. Amounts exclude changes related to income tax expense (benefits) in jurisdictions with a full valuation allowance throughout the period.

Automotive revenue is attributed to geographic areas based on the country in which our subsidiary is located. Automotive Financing revenue is attributed to the geographic area where the financing is originated. The following table summarizes information concerning principal geographic areas (dollars in millions):
At and For the Years Ended December 31,At and For the Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Net Sales & Revenue Long-Lived Assets Net Sales & Revenue Long-Lived Assets Net Sales & Revenue Long-Lived AssetsNet Sales & Revenue Long-Lived Assets Net Sales & Revenue Long-Lived Assets Net Sales & Revenue Long-Lived Assets
Automotive                      
U.S.$88,784
 $15,844
 $85,105
 $13,520
 $79,868
 $11,736
$93,559
 $18,813
 $88,784
 $15,844
 $85,105
 $13,520
Non-U.S.63,308
 12,289
 65,190
 12,425
 68,998
 13,709
57,533
 12,355
 63,308
 12,289
 65,190
 12,425
GM Financial                      
U.S.2,233
 2,472
 1,832
 1,112
 1,363
 532
2,549
 5,477
 2,233
 2,472
 1,832
 1,112
Non-U.S.1,102
 1,043
 129
 590
 47
 300
2,288
 1,755
 1,102
 1,043
 129
 590
Total consolidated$155,427
 $31,648
 $152,256
 $27,647
 $150,276
 $26,277
$155,929
 $38,400
 $155,427
 $31,648
 $152,256
 $27,647

No individual country other than the U.S. represented more than 10% of our total Net sales and revenue or Long-lived assets.

Note 26. Supplemental Information for the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

The following table summarizes the sources (uses) of cash provided by Change in other operating assets and liabilities and cash paid for income taxes and interest (dollars in millions):

132



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —— (Continued)


Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Accounts receivable$8
 $(460) $(1,572)$(1,248) $8
 $(460)
Purchases of wholesale receivables, net(2,000) 
 
Inventories59
 (326) (2,760)(309) 59
 (326)
Automotive equipment on operating leases(968) 370
 (522)(1,949) (968) 370
Change in other assets(563) (312) (320)(213) (563) (312)
Accounts payable(485) 162
 2,139
19
 (485) 162
Income taxes payable(161) 155
 (360)(145) (161) 155
Accrued liabilities and other liabilities784
 1,041
 (727)6,089
 784
 1,041
Total$(1,326) $630
 $(4,122)$244
 $(1,326) $630
Cash paid for income taxes and interest          
Cash paid for income taxes$727
 $575
 $569
$947
 $727
 $575
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized) - Automotive$299
 $335
 $226
$301
 $299
 $335
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized) - GM Financial760
 298
 284
1,120
 760
 298
Total cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized)$1,059
 $633
 $510
$1,421
 $1,059
 $633

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None

115



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our CEO and Executive Vice President and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) at December 31, 20132014. Based on these evaluations, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 were effective as of December 31, 20132014.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 20132014, utilizing the criteria discussed in the “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The objective of this assessment was to determine whether our internal control over financial reporting was effective at December 31, 20132014. Based on management's assessment, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at December 31, 2013.2014.


133



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Controls

We have commenced several transformation initiatives to centralize and simplify our business processes and systems. These are long-term initiatives which we believe will enhance our internal controls over financial reporting due to increased automation and further integration of related processes. We will continue to monitor our internal controls over financial reporting throughout the transformation.

There have not been any other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 20132014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
/s/    MARY T. BARRA         /s/    CHARLES K. STEVENS III
Mary T. Barra
Chief Executive Officer
 
Charles K. Stevens III
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
February 6, 20144, 2015 February 6, 20144, 2015

*  *  *  *  *  *  *


134



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 9B. Other Information
None
*  *  *  *  *  *  *
 

135
116



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Corporation'sCompany's directors, officers, and employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,CEO, CFO, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer and any other persons performing similar functions. The text of our code of ethics, “Winning With Integrity,” has been posted on our website at http://investor.gm.com at Investors - Corporate Governance. We will provide a copy of the code of ethics without charge upon request to Corporate Secretary, General Motors Company, Mail Code 482-C25-A36, 300 Renaissance Center, P.O. Box 300, Detroit, MI 48265-3000. We will disclose on our website any amendment to or waiver from our code of ethics on behalf of any of our executive officers or directors.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *

Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14

Information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC, pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of the 20132014 fiscal year, all of which information is hereby incorporated by reference in, and made part of, this Form 10-K, except the information required by Item 10 with respect to our code of ethics in Item 10 above and disclosure of our executive officers, which is included in Item 1 of Part I of this report.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *


117



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits
 
(a)1.    All Financial Statements and Supplemental Information
2.    Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Item 8.    

3.    Exhibits

 
(b)Exhibits
Exhibit Number Exhibit Name  
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of General Motors Company dated December 7, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of General Motors Company filed December 13, 2010 Incorporated by Reference
3.2 Bylaws of General Motors Company, as amended and restated as of November 19, 2013,October 7, 2014, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of General Motors Company filed November 22, 2013October 10, 2014 Incorporated by Reference
4.1 CertificateIndenture dated as of Designations of Series A Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock ofSeptember 27, 2013, between General Motors Company and the Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.14.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of General Motors Company filed April 30, 2014Incorporated by Reference
4.2First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 27, 2013 to the Indenture dated as of September 27, 2013 between General Motors Company and the Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of General Motors Company filed May 22, 2014Incorporated by Reference
4.3Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 12, 2014 to the Indenture dated as of September 27, 2013 between General Motors Company and the Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of General Motors Company filed November 16, 200912, 2014 Incorporated by Reference
10.1†Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement by and among General Motors of Canada Limited, as Borrower, and the other loan parties and Export Development Canada, as Lender, dated July 10, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of General Motors Company filed November 16, 2010Incorporated by Reference
10.2Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement by and among General Motors of Canada Limited, as Borrower, and the other loan parties and Export Development Canada, as Lender, dated October 15, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of General Motors Company filed October 23, 2009Incorporated by Reference

136



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit NumberExhibit Name
10.3 Stockholders Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2009 between General Motors Company, the United States Department of the Treasury, Canada GEN Investment Corporation (fka 7176384 Canada Inc.), the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, and, for limited purposes, General Motors LLC, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of General Motors Company filed November 16, 2009 Incorporated by Reference
10.410.2 Equity Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2009, between General Motors Company, the United States Department of Treasury, Canada GEN Investment Corporation (fka 7176384 Canada Inc.), the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Motors Liquidation Company, and, for limited purposes, General Motors LLC, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Motors Liquidation Company filed October 21, 2009 Incorporated by Reference
10.510.3 Letter Agreement regarding Equity Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 21, 2010, among General Motors Company, the United States Department of Treasury, Canada GEN Investment Corporation, the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust and Motors Liquidation Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168919) of General Motors Company filed November 3, 2010 Incorporated by Reference
10.610.4 Form of Compensation Statement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed April 7, 2010 Incorporated by Reference
10.710.5 General Motors Company 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended January 13, 2014, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed February 6, 2014 Filed HerewithIncorporated by Reference
10.810.6 The General Motors Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Motors Company filed May 6, 2011 Incorporated by Reference
10.910.7 General Motors Company Executive Retirement Plan, with modifications through October 10, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed February 15, 2013 Incorporated by Reference
10.1010.8 General Motors Company Salary Stock Plan, as amended January 13, 2014,Filed Herewith
10.11General Motors Company Short Term Incentive Plan, as amended August 19, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Motors Company filed October 30, 2013Incorporated by Reference
10.12Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant made to top 25 highly compensated employees under General Motors Company 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as Amended March 1, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2010.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed April 7, 2010February 6, 2014Incorporated by Reference

118



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit NumberExhibit Name
10.9General Motors Company 2014 Short-Term Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of General Motors Company filed June 12, 2014 Incorporated by Reference
10.1310.10 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant (Cash Settlement) made to top 25 highly compensated employees under General Motors Company 20092014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as Amended March 1, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2110.1 to the AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K8-K of General Motors Company filed April 7, 2010June 12, 2014 Incorporated by Reference
10.1410.11 Form of General Motors Company 2010 Equity Grant Award Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed March 1, 2011 Incorporated by Reference
10.1510.12 Form of General Motors Company March 15, 2010 Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement, as amended December 31, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed March 1, 2011 Incorporated by Reference
10.1610.13 Form of General Motors Company Equity Grant Agreement (cash settlement) dated December 15, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed February 27, 2012 Incorporated by Reference
10.1710.14 Form of General Motors Company Equity Grant Agreement dated December 15, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed February 27, 2012 Incorporated by Reference
10.1810.15 General Motors Company Vehicle Operations — Senior Management Vehicle Program (SMVP) Supplement, revised December 15, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Motors Liquidation Company filed March 28, 2006 Incorporated by Reference
10.19†Amended and Restated United States Consumer Financing Services Agreement between GMAC LLC and General Motors Corporation dated May 22, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of General Motors Company filed November 16, 2010Incorporated by Reference
10.20†Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement between GMAC LLC and General Motors Corporation dated May 22, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of General Motors Company filed November 16, 2010Incorporated by Reference
10.2110.16 Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2009, between General Motors Company and U.S. Bank National Association, including Form of Warrant Certificate attached as Exhibit D thereto, relating to warrants with a $30 original ($10 after stock split) exercise price and a July 10, 2016 expiration date, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed April 7, 2010 Incorporated by Reference

137



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit Number10.17 Exhibit Name
10.22Second Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2013,October 16, 2009, between General Motors Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Warrant Agent, including a Form of Warrant Certificate attached as Exhibit D thereto, relating to warrants with a $55 original ($18.33 after stock split) exercise price and a July 10, 2019 expiration date, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed April 7, 2010 Incorporated by Reference
10.2310.18 Second Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2013, between General Motors Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Warrant Agent, including a Form of Warrant Certificate attached as Exhibit B thereto, relating to warrants with an exercise price of $42.31 per share and a December 31, 2015 expiration date, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of General Motors Company filed August 12, 2013 Incorporated by Reference
10.24†10.19† Amended and Restated Master Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2012, between General Motors Holdings LLC and Peugeot S.A., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed February 6, 2014 Filed HerewithIncorporated by Reference
10.25†10.20† Amended and Restated 3-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 5, 2012,October 17, 2014, among General Motors Holdings, LLC,Company, General Motors Financial Company, Inc., GM Europe Treasury Company AB, General Motors do Brasil Ltda., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the several lenders from time to time party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Banco Do Brasil, as administrative agent for the Brazilian lenders,and Citibank, N.A., as syndication agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as co-syndication agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A8-K filed February 7, 2013October 22, 2014. Incorporated by Reference
10.26†10.21† Amended and Restated 5-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 5, 2012,October 17, 2014, among General Motors Holdings, LLC,Company, General Motors Financial Company, Inc., General Motors do Brasil Ltda., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the several lenders from time to time party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndicationadministrative agent, and Bank of America,Citibank, N.A., as co-syndicationsyndication agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A8-K filed February 7, 2013October 22, 2014. Incorporated by Reference
10.2710.22 Share TransferDirector's Service Agreement dated November 21, 2012 between General Motors Financial Company, Inc.Adam Opel AG and Ally Financial Inc.Dr. Karl-Thomas Neumann, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3310.28 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company filed February 15, 20136, 2014 Incorporated by Reference
10.2810.23 Director's Service AgreementAmendment to Warrant Agreements between Adam Opel AGGeneral Motors Company and Dr. Karl-Thomas NeumannU.S. Bank National Association amending Exhibits 10.16, 10.17 and 10.18 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K of General Motors Company incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Motors Company filed April 24, 2014 Filed HerewithIncorporated by Reference
10.24Form of General Motors Company Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Long-Term Incentive Plan incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Motors Company filed July 24, 2014Incorporated by Reference
10.25Form of General Motors Company Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Motors Company filed July 24, 2014Incorporated by Reference
12 ComputationComputations of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and the Periods July 10, 2009 through December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2009 through July 9, 2009 Filed Herewith

119



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit NumberExhibit Name
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 20132014 Filed Herewith
2323.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for audited financial statements of General Motors CompanyFiled Herewith
23.2Consent of Independent Auditors for audited financial statements of Shanghai General Motors Co., Ltd. Filed Herewith
24 Power of Attorney for Directors of General Motors Company Filed Herewith
31.1 Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Filed Herewith
31.2 Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Filed Herewith
32 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Furnished with this Report
99.1 Principal Executive OfficerShanghai General Motors Co., Ltd. audited consolidated financial statements including the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014, and Principal Financial Officer Executive Privilegesthe related consolidated statements of income and Compensation Certificatecomprehensive income, equity and cash flow for the year then ended. Filed Herewith
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document Furnished with this Report
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document Furnished with this Report
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document Furnished with this Report
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document Furnished with this Report
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document Furnished with this Report
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document Furnished with this Report

Certain confidential portions have been omitted pursuant to a granted request for confidential treatment, which has been separately filed with the SEC.
*Submitted electronically with this Report.

* * * * * * *

138
120



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
  
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
(Registrant)


 
  By:/s/ MARY T. BARRA 
   Mary T. Barra
Chief Executive Officer
 
Date:February 6, 20144, 2015   

139
121



Table of Contents
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on this 6th4th day of February 20142015 by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated, including a majority of the directors.
Signature Title
   
/s/ MARY T. BARRA Chief Executive Officer
Mary T. Barra  
   
/s/ CHARLES K. STEVENS III Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Charles K. Stevens III  
   
/s/ THOMAS S. TIMKO Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Thomas S. Timko  
   
/s/ THEODORE M. SOLSO Chairman
Theodore M. Solso  
   
/s/ DAVID BONDERMANJOSEPH J. ASHTON Director
David BondermanJoseph J. Ashton  
   
/s/ ERROLL B. DAVIS, JR. Director
Erroll B. Davis, Jr.  
   
/s/ STEPHEN J. GIRSKY Director
Stephen J. Girsky  
   
/s/ E. NEVILLE ISDELL Director
E. Neville Isdell
/s/ ROBERT D. KREBSDirector
Robert D. Krebs  
   
/s/ KATHRYN V. MARINELLO Director
Kathryn V. Marinello  
   
/s/ ADMIRAL MICHAEL G. MULLEN, USN (ret.) Director
Admiral Michael G. Mullen, USN (ret.)  
   
/s/ JAMES J. MULVA Director
James J. Mulva  
   
/s/ PATRICIA F. RUSSO Director
Patricia F. Russo  
   
/s/ THOMAS M. SCHOEWE Director
Thomas M. Schoewe  
   
/s/ CAROL M. STEPHENSON Director
Carol M. Stephenson  
/s/ DR. CYNTHIA A. TELLESDirector
Dr. Cynthia A. Telles


140
122