UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 20142015

Commission File No. 000-54838

CASSIDY VENTURESLASH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		26-1240056
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

297 President Street

Brooklyn, New York 11231

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(212) 729-6448(206) 517-7141

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

#204 - 1110 Finch Ave WestCassidy Ventures Inc.

Toronto, Ontario

Canada M3J 3T6

 (Former(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x¨ No ¨x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨x No x¨

At December 31, 2013,2014, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) was approximately $54,562,500.$126,800,000. At October 13, 2014,June 30, 2015, there were 135,000,000148,000,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding. At June 30, 2014, the end of the Registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, there were 135,000,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

CASSIDY VENTURESLASH, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page No.
PART I
Item 1.	Business			4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors			14	5
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments			14	5
Item 2.	Properties			14	5
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings			14	5
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures			14	5
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			15	6
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data			16	7
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			16	7
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			17	8
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			F-1
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			18	9
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures			18	9
Item 9B.	Other Information			19	10
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			20	11
Item 11.	Executive Compensation			22	13
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			23	14
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			24	15
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services			24	15
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules			25	16
Signatures	Signatures		26	17

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cassidy VenturesLash, Inc., a Nevada corporation, contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements. The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results. Additional factors that could materially affect these forward-looking statements and/or predictions include, among other things: the volatility of minerals prices, the possibility that exploration efforts will not yield economically recoverable quantities of minerals, accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration and development operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration and development plans, other factors over which we have little or no control; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Our management has included projections and estimates in this Form 10-K, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

All references in this Form 10-K to the ”Company”, “Cassidy Ventures“Lash, Inc.”, “we”, “us,” or “our” are to Cassidy VenturesLash, Inc.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

ORGANIZATION WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS

On September 14, 2009, the Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. We are engaged in the business of acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties. On October 19, 2016, under the laws of the State of Nevada, we changed our name from “Cassidy Ventures Inc.” to “Lash, Inc,”, though we did not change our plan of business in connection with such name change.

Daniel Kramer served as the Company’s sole director for one day, September 14, 2009, which is the same date of our incorporation. Mr. Kramer is an employee of Val-U-Corp Services, Inc. (“Val-U-Corp”), which is a company which provides incorporation services in the state of Nevada, our state of incorporation. Linda Lamb, our current Secretary, Treasurer and a director, retained the services of Val-U-Corp for the purpose of incorporating our company. Nevada law requires that at least one director be named in a corporation’s Articles of Incorporation, upon filing with the Nevada Secretary of State. Mr. Kramer named himself a director in our Articles of Incorporation, solely for the purpose of meeting the statutory requirements in Nevada to file Articles of Incorporation, as part of Val-U-Corp’s incorporation’s services. On September 14, 2009, the date our Articles of Incorporation were filed, Mr. Kramer appointed Linda Lamb as a director and Mr. Kramer resigned as a director.

Keith FredricksAmber Joy Finney has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and sole director since February 19, 2013.September 28, 2016. Ms. Finney is also the holder of 159,000,000 shares of our common stock, amounting to 51.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. William Drury has served as our Secretary since February 19, 2013.

William Drury also served as our Treasurer and sole director sincefrom February 19, 2013.2013, until September 28, 2016. Mr. Drury also served as our President from July 31, 2015 until September 28, 2016. Keith Fredricks served as our President from February 19, 2013 until July 31, 2015.

Edward Hayes served as our President, from July 30, 2010, until February 19, 2013. Linda Lamb served as our Secretary and Treasurer since September 14, 2009, until February 19, 2013, and was President from September 14, 2009 through July 30, 2010.

Our boardAs of directors is comprised of one person: William Drury.

We areJune 30, 2015, we were authorized to issue 256,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share.

IN GENERAL

Cassidy Ventures,Lash, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 14, 2009, and hashad acquired mineral properties located in the Thunder Bay mining district, Province of Ontario, Canada but hashad not yet determined whether these properties contain reserves that are economically recoverable. We are currently conducting mineral exploration activities on the Mobert Property in order to assess whether it contains any commercially exploitable mineral reserves. Currently there are no known mineral reserves on the Mobert Property.

We have not earned any revenues to date. Our independent auditor has issued an audit opinion which includes a statement raising substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The source of information contained in this discussion is our geology report prepared by Caitlin L Jeffs, P.Geo., of Fladgate Exploration Consulting, dated June 2011.

There is the likelihood of our mineral claim containing little or no economic mineralization or reserves of gold, zinc and other minerals. We are presently in the exploration stage of our business and we can provide no assurance that any commercially viable mineral deposits exist on our mineral claims, that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of mineral resources on our property, or, if such deposits are discovered, that we will enter into further substantial exploration programs. Further exploration is required before a final determination can be made as to whether our mineral claims possess commercially exploitable mineral deposits. If our claim does not contain any reserves all funds that we spend on exploration will be lost.

ACQUISITION OF THE MOBERT PROPERTY

On June 17, 2011, we purchased a 100% undivided interest in a mineral claim known as the Mobert property for a price of $5,888. The claim is registered in the name of Kelvin Michael Ladoucour, who is a prospector retained by the Company to stake the Company’s claim. Mr. Ladoucour holds the claim in trust for the Company.

We engaged Fladgate Exploration Consulting (“Fladgate”), to prepare a geological evaluation report on the Mobert Property. Caitlin L Jeffs, P.Geo., is the professional geologist at Fladgate who conduct the evaluation. Mr. Jeffs received her HBSc in Geology degree from the University of British Columbia in 2002.

The work completed by Mr. Jeffs in preparing the geological report consisted of a review of geological data from previous exploration within the region. The acquisition of this data involved the research and investigation of historical files to locate and retrieve data information acquired by previous exploration companies in the area of the mineral claim.

We received the geological evaluation report on the Mobert Property entitled “Mobert Property Review Report” prepared by Mr. Jeffs in April 2011. The geological report summarizes the results of the history of the exploration of the mineral claims, the regional and local geology of the mineral claims and the mineralization and the geological formations identified as a result of the prior exploration. The geological report also gives conclusions regarding potential mineralization of the mineral claims and recommends a further geological exploration program on the mineral claim. The description of the Mobert Property provided below is based on Mr. Jeffs’s report.

We commenced Phase 1 of the exploration program on August 1, 2012. Approximately $4,862 was expended on the Mobert Property between August 1, 2012 and September 21, 2012.

On September 21, 2012, the Company received its 2012 Soil Sampling Program report for soil sampling for the Mobert Property. The report, prepared by Fladgate Exploration Consulting Corporation, confirmed that soil samples were taken from the Mobert Property. The report states, in relevant part:

“"B-horizon soil sampling was planned over roughly one quarter of the Property. A grid was created consisting of eleven lines spaced 100m apart, with a total of 141 planned samples spaced at 25m. Eight samples were unable to be taken due to ground conditions, leaving 133 samples taken in total.

All samples were prepared and analysed through Accurassay Laboratories, located in Thunder Bay, Ontario. All samples sent for analyses are dried at 60°C and subjected to a jaw crusher, proceeding afterwards through an 80-mesh sieve. Samples were analysed for gold, and the Accurassay procedure ALFA3 was selected for fire assay and ICP finish, with minimal sample needed (30g). Detection limits for ALFA3 range from 3 – 10,000ppb.

Results from the 2012 soil sampling program are pending.”"

4

Table of Contents

The Company has not received the 2012 soil sampling results.

During the period endedWe were conducting mineral exploration activities in order to assess whether they contained any commercially exploitable mineral reserves. As of June 30, 2013, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $5,888 on the mining claims.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

The Mobert property is comprised of 1 mining claim totaling 12 units. The property covers a 1.2 km long portion of the Schreiber-Hemlo greenstone belt.

The primary commodity being explored for on the Mobert property is zinc and gold. Exploration2015, we ceased our exploration operations in the past consisted of geological mapping, prospecting, airborne and ground magnetic and electromagnetic surveys and some soil sampling.

The Mobert property is located in the south central part of the Black River Area Township within the Thunder Bay Mining Divisionmining district due to a lack of Northwestern Ontario, Canada (Figure 1). The nearest towns are Manitouwadge 26 km to the north, Marathon 45 km to the southwest and White River 42 km to the southeast. The Hemlo Gold Camp is 23 km to the south-southwest along the TransCanada Highway.

The property is on NTS Sheet 42C13. The centre of the property has approximate geographic coordinates of 48°53’24.30”N, 85°50’44.44”W (UTM NAD83 Zone 16N 584614mE, 5415879mN). The Mobert property is comprised of 1 mining claim totaling 12 units and covering 190 hectares, 1.6km long by roughly 1.2km wide in a rectangular shape.

The property is situated in Northwestern Ontario at the west end of the Dotted Lake Property. Access to the property is a logging road that branches east from Highway 614 and passes north-easterly through the middle of the property (see Figure 1 below).

The nearest towns are Manitouwadge 26 km to the north, Marathon 45 km to the southwest and White River 42 km to the southeast. The Hemlo Gold Camp is 23 km to the south-southwest along the TransCanada Highway. A pool of skilled labour for mining and exploration is present in the communities of Manitouwadge, Marathon and White River. All three communities have housing and facilities for educational, commercial and leisure activities. The city of Thunder Bay, 400 km to the west, is the nearest large regional population centre with many services and amenities for industrial, educational and leisure activities. The airport at Thunder Bay has daily schedules flights to Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary and Winnipeg. The nearest railroad is the Canadian Pacific Railroad 20 km to the south along the TransCanada Highway. A Hydro One high voltage power transmission line passes 18 km south of the property.

The claim was staked on September 18, 2010 and recorded with the Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry, in the Province of Ontario, Canada, on September 23, 2010 under mining claim number 4256860.

FIGURE 1: MOBERT PROPERTY CLAIMS

PHYSIOGRAPHY, CLIMATE, VEGETATION & WATER

The climate is characterized by long cold winters and hot summers. Average daily temperatures in summer range from 10° to 24°C and from 0° to -22°C in the winter months. In general, soil sampling, geological mapping and trenching programs are limited to the summer months. Snow cover and freezing conditions prevail from mid-November until late April and make transportation through the property easier for large equipment during the months when swampy wet ground is frozen and easier to move across.

The property is covered by lakes, swamps and low wooded hills. Elevations on the property vary from 380 to 450 m above sea level. A steep slope that is difficult to move down or up crosses the centre of the property in a north-easterly direction. The slope is shown in the topography on Figure 1. Vegetation is typical for a mixed boreal forest and the dominant tree species are spruce, balsam, jackpine, birch and poplar.

FIGURE 2: REGIONAL LOCATION

PROPERTY HISTORY

Past documented exploration is summarized in Table 1. A high-grade zinc mineralization was first discovered in the area on Dotted Lake by trapper/prospector A. Fairservice in 1957. This discovery (the Fairservice zinc showing) occurred on the neighbouring Dotted Lake Property and being exploration in the area. In the 1960’s several geophysical surveys were completed on the Mobert Property and geologic mapping was completed by the OGS over the entire Black River area. In 1983, a combined VLF and magnetometer survey was done on the property. Most recently geological mapping and whole rock geochemical sampling was completely in 1993.

Recent exploration on the adjacent Dotted Lake property has discovered a previously unknown gold occurrence. In 2008 and 2009 soil sampling and prospecting was carried out on the Dotted Lake Property, which returned positive results for gold on the Dotted Lake property. The following year, a trenching and prospecting program was completed by Fladgate Exploration for Rouge Resources. Four trenches were cut following up on soil anomalies returned in the 2008 and 2009 programs and prospecting.

Table 1: Past Exploration at Mobert Property

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

Information on the regional and area geology is mainly from government sources, maps and reports (Milne 1968, Sirgusa 1986). The property is situated in the Wawa sub-province of the Superior province of the Canadian Shield (Figure 3). All rocks are of Archaean age, with the exception of Proterozoic diabase dykes. The claim covers a portion of the north eastern part of the Schreiber-Hemlo Greenstone Belt. The eastern segment is subdivided into the 2.77 billion year old Hemlo-Black River assemblage to the northeast and the 2.7 billion year old Heron Bay Assemblage to the southwest. The assemblages are separated by the Lake Superior-Hemlo fault zone. The primary rock type of the Hemlo-Greenstone Black River assemblage is mafic volcanics. Felsic and intermediate volcanic rocks and clastics overlie the mafic volcanics. The belt is intruded by numerous felsic granitoids. Several stages of regional folding occurred in the belt, the latest stage is the most pervasive and occurred contemporaneous to, or predated, the intrusion of the granitoid bodies.

LOCAL GEOLOGY

Local geological data is taken from government reports (Milne 1968, McKay 1994) and from exploration work by Clear Mines Ltd. (Symonds, 1983) and also from drill holes completed by Noranda in 1991 (Degagne 1991) and are supplemented by Andre M. Pauwels NI 43-101 technical report (Pauwels, 2005). The Mobert property claim covers both the northern felsic units and the Dotted Lake Arm portion of the Schreiber-Hemlo Greenstone Belt (Figure 4).

The predominant rock type in the area is foliated, fine grained, dark green, amphibole rich metavolcanic rock. Medium and coarse grained amphibolites are less common and occasional remnant pillow textures have been observed indicating a submarine depositional environment. Small sills and dykes of granitoid rocks are common in the volcanic rocks. A few thin (1 cm to 30 cm) layers of intermediate to felsic volcanic tuffs were observed in the area just north of Dotted Lake in the general vicinity of the Fairservice showing (Pauwels, 2005). A small patch of intermediate volcanics is indicated on Milne’s map (Milne 1968) in the same area and short sections of felsic volcanic rocks were intersected in the Noranda drill holes (Degagne 1991). Magnetite, pyrrhotite-rich and garnetiferous amphibolitic iron formation is reported from drill holes 2 and 3 drilled by Noranda and contains massive sphalerite at the Fairservice showing. These horizons, although volumetrically a small proportion of the rocks in the area, appear to be continuous along strike within the metavolcanic rocks according to geophysical surveys. Foliation of the metavolcanic rock is persistently east-northeasterly trending within an isoclinal syncline within the metavolcanics of the Dotted Lake Arm. This syncline appears to plunge to the west-southwest. The metamorphism within the belt is amphibolite grade.

To the east mafic and ultramafic intrusive complex of gabbro, peridotite and serpentinized peridotite intruded along the southern flank of the mafic volcanics. Ground magnetic surveys in the area indicate that this complex extends 800m further to the west than indicated on OGS Map 3086 (Siragusa 1986). This area is covered by overburden. Granitoid rocks of the Dotted Lake Batholith outcrop to the south. The granatoids are pink to light pink in colour, foliated and medium grained, and appear to intrude both the metavolcanics and mafic/ultramafic rocks.

LOCAL ALTERATION AND MINERALIZATION

Pervasive alteration has not been found over large spans in the area. Small segments of bleached and epidotized amphibolite are described in the Noranda drill holes at the contact of iron formations intersected and in descriptions of the Fairservice showing.

Mineralization to the east of the Mobert Property was first discovered at the Fairservice zinc showing. The showing was described in detail by M. Smyk (McKay 1994). According to Smyk, the showing is hosted within a narrow band (up to 80 cm wide) of iron formation within mafic volcanic rock. It is described as follows:

“The mineralized zone occurs in the mafic volcanics and is oriented parallel to both the host rock foliation and the elongation direction of the pillows. The host metavolcanics become noticeably altered within 1 m of the mineralized zone.”

The mineralization is further described to be exposed over a maximum 20 m length and to contain sphalerite, magnetite, amphibole and disseminated garnet. The southern contact of the mineralization is a 1 m to 2 m thin felsic dyke, in part with the appearance of fissile sericite schist. The mineralization was interpreted by McKay to be hosted by iron formation which can be seen in intermittent outcrops over 200 m to the east of the showing. Grab samples from this iron formation reported by Smyk showed low anomalous zinc values.

Several rock samples at the OGS in Thunder Bay show a 2 cm band of massive, coarsely crystalline, dark brown sphalerite (35%) adjacent to well aligned coarse grains of magnetite (25%) intermixed with coarse crystals of sphalerite and a matrix of dark green amphibole and chlorite (40%) and a small amount of disseminated phyrrotite and chalcopyrite. A grab sample reported by Smyk (in McKay 1994) contained 9.44% Zn, 0.012% Cu, and 0.006 oz per ton gold.

One other zinc occurrence hosted in iron formation is reported from the Dotted Lake Arm. This occurrence, called the Brinklow zinc showing, is located approximately 6 km to the southwest of the Fairservice showing. The Brinklow showing was drilled by Noranda in 1994 with no significant results (Lockwood 1994).

The occurrence of massive sulphide bands hosted in an exhalative sedimentary unit within sea floor volcanic rocks with a component of intermediate to felsic volcanic rock classifies the mineralizationfunds, but maintained our plan as a metamorphosed volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) type of occurrence.

Figure 3: Geological Subprovinces of the Canadian Shield

Figure 4: Property Geology

PRESENT PROPERTY CONDITION AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS

The Mobert Property has no plant and equipment, infrastructure or other facilities, and there is currently no exploration of the Mobert Property. We have incurred $87,516 in operating costs, and an additional $5,888 in property acquisition, as at June 30, 2014. We expect to incur $94,000 of exploration costs to complete Phases 1, 2 and 3 of our Plan of Operation, with Phase 3 being Positive areas of the Mobert Property being diamond drill tested. There is no source of power or water on the Mobert Property that can be utilized.

Not less than $4,800 had to have been expended on the Mobert Property prior to September 23, 2015 to keep the claim in good standing for an additional year. No other permits are required for us to perform the exploration activities on the Mobert Property.

Approximately, $4,862 was expended on the Mobert Property between August 1, 2012 and September 21, 2012.

On September 21, 2012, the Company received its 2012 Soil Sampling Program report for soil sampling for the Mobert Property. The report, prepared by Fladgate Exploration Consulting Corporation, confirmed that soil samples were taken from the Mobert Property. The report states, in relevant part:

“B-horizon soil sampling was planned over roughly one quarter of the Property. A grid was created consisting of eleven lines spaced 100m apart, with a total of 141 planned samples spaced at 25m. Eight samples were unable to be taken due to ground conditions, leaving 133 samples taken in total.

All samples were prepared and analysed through Accurassay Laboratories, located in Thunder Bay, Ontario. All samples sent for analyses are dried at 60°C and subjected to a jaw crusher, proceeding afterwards through an 80-mesh sieve. Samples were analysed for gold, and the Accurassay procedure ALFA3 was selected for fire assay and ICP finish, with minimal sample needed (30g). Detection limits for ALFA3 range from 3 – 10,000ppb.

Results from the 2012 soil sampling program are pending.”

The Company has not received the 2012 soil sampling results.

During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $5,888 on the mining claims.

CONDITIONS TO RETAIN TITLE TO THE CLAIM

Provincial and Federal regulations require a yearly maintenance fee to keep the claim in good standing. In accordance with Federal regulations, the Mobert property is in good standing to September 23, 2015. Not less than $4,800 had to have been expended on the Mobert property prior to September 23, 2015 to keep the claim in good standing for an additional year.

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

The mineral exploration business is an extremely competitive industry. We are competing with many other exploration companies looking for minerals. We are a very early stage mineral exploration company, seeking other mining properties to explore and a very small participant in the mineral exploration business. Being a junior mineral exploration company, we compete with other companies like oursasses for financing and joint venture partners. Additionally, we compete for resources such as professional geologists, camp staff, helicopters and mineral exploration supplies.

GOVERNMENT APPROVALS AND RECOMMENDATIONSeconomic potential.

We will be required to comply with all regulations, rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the exploration of minerals in Canada generally, and in Ontario specifically.have never earned any revenues.

COSTS AND EFFECTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS

We currently have no costsOur independent auditor has issued an audit opinion which includes a statement raising substantial doubt as to comply with environmental laws concerning our exploration program. We will also haveability to sustain the cost of reclamation and environmental remediation for all work undertaken which causes sufficient surface disturbance to necessitate reclamation work. Both reclamation and environmental remediation refer to putting disturbed ground backcontinue as close to its original state as possible. Other potential pollution or damage must be cleaned-up and renewed along standard guidelines outlined in the usual permits. Reclamation is the process of bringing the land back to a natural state after completion of exploration activities. Environmental remediation refers to the physical activity of taking steps to remediate, or remedy, any environmental damage caused, i.e. refilling trenches after sampling or cleaning up fuel spills. Our initial programs do not require any reclamation or remediation other than minor clean up and removal of supplies because of minimal disturbance to the ground. The amount of these costs is not known at this time as we do not know the extent of the exploration program we will undertake, beyond completion of the recommended three phases described above. Because there is presently no information on the size, tenor, or quality of any resource or reserve at this time, it is impossible to assess the impact of any capital expenditures on our earnings or competitive position in the event a potentially economic deposit is discovered.going concern.

EMPLOYEES

We currently have no employees, other thanexcept our directors. We intend to retain the services of geologists, prospectorsofficers and consultants on a contract basis to conduct the exploration programs on our mineral claims and to assist with regulatory compliance and preparation of financial statements.sole director.

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Our executive offices are located at: 297 President Street, Brooklyn, New York 11231.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our current business address is 297 President Street, Brooklyn, New York 11231. We believe that this space is adequate for our current needs. Our telephone number is (212) 729-6448.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings and we are not aware of any pending or potential legal actions.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS MARKET INFORMATION

Since March 30, 2012, our shares of common stock have been quoted on the over-the-counter markets, currently on the OTC Bulletin Board andPink tier of the OTCQB,OTC Markets Group, Inc. (the “OTC Markets Group”), under the stock symbol “CSVN”. The following table shows the reported high and low closing bid prices per share for our common stock based on information provided by the OTCQB.OTC Markets Group. The over-the-counter market quotations set forth for our common stock reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

HOLDERS

As of June 30, 2015, the dateCompany had 148,000,000 shares of this report, there were 31common stock issued and outstanding, and we had approximately 33 holders of record of our common stock.

DIVIDENDS

Historically, we have not paid any dividends to the holders of our common stock and we do not expect to pay any such dividends in the foreseeable future as we expect to retain our future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business.

TRANSFER AGENT

Our transfer agent is Empire Stock Transfer of Henderson, Nevada. Their address is 1859 Whitney Mesa Dr., Henderson, Nevada 89014 and their telephone number is (702) 818-5898.

HOLDERS

As of June 30, 2014 the Company had 135,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding held by approximatley 31 holders of record.

6

Table of Contents

DIVIDENDS

Historically, we have not paid any dividends to the holders of our common stock and we do not expect to pay any such dividends in the foreseeable future as we expect to retain our future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

None.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

We have not established any compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE REGISTRANT AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during the year ended June 30, 2014.2015.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We have generated no revenues since September 14, 2009 (inception).

For the year ended June 30, 2015, we incurred $18,410,518 in operating expenses, which were comprised of $180,000 in consulting fee expense, $24,195 in professional fees and $18,206,323 in general and administrative expenses.

For the year ended June 30, 2014, we incurred $197,318 in operating expenses, which were comprised of $13,981 in professional fees and $183,337 in general and administrative costs.

For the year ended June 30, 2013, we incurred $119,789 in operating expenses. These expenses were comprised of $75,000 in consulting fee expense, $13,500 in management fees and rent, $8,474 in exploration expense, $15,356 in professional fees and $7,459 in general and administrative costs. Additionally, at June 30, 2013, we incurred an impairment loss of $5,888.

The following table provides selected financial data about our company for the years ended June 30, 20142015 and 2013.2014.

7

Table of Contents

GOING CONCERN

Cassidy VenturesLash, Inc. is an exploration stage company and currently has no operations. Our independent auditor has issued an audit opinion for Cassidy VenturesLash, Inc. which includes a statement raising substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our cash balance at June 30, 20142015 was $0$86 with $300,011$510,615 in outstanding liabilities. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $35,000. If we experience a shortage of funds prior to generating revenues from operations we may utilize funds from our directors, who have informally agreed to advance funds to allow us to pay for operating costs, however they have no formal commitment, arrangement or legal obligation to advance or loan funds to us. Management believes our current cash balance will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 the Company's accrued expenses to a related party increased $180,000 as a result of officers deferring receipt of their contractual compensation in order to help provide cash for operations.

Cash and cash equivalents on June 30, 2015 were $86, an increase of $86 from June 30, 2014. 

Operating activities used cash of $41,061 in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, compared to providing cash of $4,763 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

Financing activities provided cash of $41,147 during the year ended June 30, 2015, compared to $4,763 during the year ended June 30, 2014. Financing activities during fiscal 2015 were net proceeds from shareholder advances.  

PLAN OF OPERATION

Our plan of operation for the twelve months is to complete the first and second phases of the three phased exploration program on our claim. In addition to the $19,000 we anticipate spending for the first two phases of the exploration program as outlined below, we anticipate spending an additional $16,000 on general and administration expenses including fees payable in connection with complying with reporting obligations, and general administrative costs. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are therefore expected to be approximately $35,000. If we experience a shortage of funds prior to funding we may utilize funds from our directors, however they have no formal commitment, arrangement or legal obligation to advance or loan funds to the company.

Phase 1: Localized soil surveys, trenching and sampling over known and indicated mineralized zones.

Phase 2: VLF-EM and magnetometer surveys.

Phase 3: Positive areas will need to be diamond drill tested. The amount of drilling will depend on the success of phase 1 and 2.

BUDGET

We commenced Phase 1 of the exploration program on August 1, 2012. Approximately $4,862 was expended on the Mobert Property between August 1, 2012 and September 21, 2012.

On September 21, 2012, the Company received its 2012 Soil Sampling Program report for soil sampling for the Mobert Property. The report, prepared by Fladgate Exploration Consulting Corporation, confirmed that soil samples were taken from the Mobert Property. The report states, in relevant part:

“B-horizon soil sampling was planned over roughly one quarter of the Property. A grid was created consisting of eleven lines spaced 100m apart, with a total of 141 planned samples spaced at 25m. Eight samples were unable to be taken due to ground conditions, leaving 133 samples taken in total.

All samples were prepared and analysed through Accurassay Laboratories, located in Thunder Bay, Ontario. All samples sent for analyses are dried at 60°C and subjected to a jaw crusher, proceeding afterwards through an 80-mesh sieve. Samples were analysed for gold, and the Accurassay procedure ALFA3 was selected for fire assay and ICP finish, with minimal sample needed (30g). Detection limits for ALFA3 range from 3 – 10,000ppb.

Results from the 2012 soil sampling program are pending.”

The Company has not received the 2012 soil sampling results.

During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $5,888 on the mining claims.

Following phase one of the exploration program, if it proves successful in identifying mineral deposits, we intend to proceed with phase two of our exploration program. Subject to the results of phase 1, we anticipate commencing with phase 2 in spring 2015. We will require additional funding to proceed with phase 3 work on the claim; we have no current plans on how to raise the additional funding. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to proceed with any work after the first two phasesdate of the exploration program.this report was to locate a mining property on which to conduct exploration.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item.

8

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MICHAEL GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

10544 ALTON AVE NE

SEATTLE, WA 98125

206.353.5736

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Lash Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Lash Inc. (formerly known as Cassidy Ventures, Inc.) as of June 30, 2015 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the period then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of Lash Inc. as of June 30, 2014 were audited by other auditors whose report dated October 13, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lash Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2015 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year the ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note #2 to the financial statements, although the Company has limited operations it has yet to attain profitability. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan in regard to these matters is also described in Note #2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ MICHAEL GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

Seattle, Washington

January 11, 2017

F-1

LBB & ASSOCIATES LTD., LLP

10260 Westheimer Road, Suite 310

Houston, TX 77042

Phone: (713) 800-4343 Fax: (713) 456-2408

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of

Cassidy Ventures, Inc.

Carson City, Nevada

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cassidy Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years then ended. Cassidy Ventures, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cassidy Ventures, Inc. as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company's absence of significant revenues, recurring losses from operations, and its need for additional financing in order to fund its projected loss in 2015 raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The 2014 financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP

LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP

Houston, Texas

October 13, 2014

F-2

Table of Contents

CASSIDY VENTURESLASH, INC.

(Formerly known as Cassidy Ventures, Inc.)

Balance Sheets