UNITED STATES

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 

x FORM 10-KANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
xANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

¨

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________ 

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

WYOMING

 

000-55012

 

22-3827597

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Commission

file number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

  

1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite 603

Edison, NJ08837

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(732) 661-9641

(Issuer’s telephone number)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

N/A

N/A

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

 

Common stock, $0.0001 par value

Title of Class

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨No ¨x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨No ¨x

 

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such a shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x    No ¨

 

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.10-K x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

¨

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

¨

Smaller reporting company

x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. Yes ¨No x 

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class

Outstanding at April 9, 20157, 2017

Common stock, $0.0001 par value

26,116,1342,319,691,386

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of preferred stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class

Outstanding at April 9, 20157, 2017

Preferred stock, Series A, no par value

3

 

Class

Outstanding at April 97, 20152017

Preferred stock, Series B, $0.10 par value

142,004103,335

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Solely for purposes of the foregoing calculation, all of the registrant’s directors and officers are deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status for this purpose does not reflect a determination that any persons are affiliates for any other purposes. $635,2822,282,965

 

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format  Yes ¨No x

  

Documents Incorporated By Reference

None

 

  

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013 
2016 and 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

4

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

13

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

19

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

19

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

19

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

19

 

PART II

ITEM 1.5.

BUSINESS

4

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

12

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

23

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

23

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

23

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

23

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

24

20

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

27

21

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

28

21

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

43

25

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

44

25

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

45

26

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

45

26

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

46

26

 

PART III

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

47

27

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

50

31

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

52

33

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

57

37

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

60

40

 

PART IV

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

61

 

SIGNATURES

6342

 

SIGNATURES

 

44

CERTIFICATIONS

 

 

 

Exhibit 31 – Management certification

 

EXHIBIT 31 –

MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

 

 

Exhibit 32 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act

 

EXHIBIT 32 –

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

2

 

Table of Contents

 

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

 

Included in this annual report are "forward-looking"“forward-looking” statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"(“PSLRA”) as well as historical information. Some of our statements under "Business," "Properties," "Legal“Business,” “Properties,” “Legal Proceedings," "Management's” “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,""”“ the Notes to Financial Statements and elsewhere in this report constitute "forward-looking statements"“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including matters described in the section titled "Risk“Risk Factors." Forward-looking statements include those that use forward-looking terminology, such as the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "project," "plan," "will," "shall," "should,"“anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “project,” “plan,” “will,” “shall,” “should,” and similar expressions, including when used in the negative. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable and achievable, these statements involve risks and uncertainties and we cannot assure you that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.

 

Such risks include, among others, the following: demand for payment of our convertible notes outstanding under which we are currently in default, our inability to obtain adequate financing to repay the convertible notes, our ability to continue financing the operations either through debt or equity offerings, international, national and local general economic and market conditions: our ability to sustain, manage or forecast our growth; material costs and availability; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other factors referenced in this filing.

 

Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-K are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated by management will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on our business operations. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these and other factors. We undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether to reflect events or circumstances after the date initially filed or published, to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or otherwise.

 

Unless otherwise noted, references in this Form 10-K to “StrikeForce”, “we”, “us”, “our”, “SFT”, “our company”, and the “Company” means StrikeForce Technologies, Inc., a Wyoming corporation.

 

3
 

Table of Contents

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. isWe are a software development and services company that offers a suite of integrated computer network security products using proprietary technology. StrikeForce Technical Services Corporation was incorporated in August 2001 under the laws of the State of New Jersey. On September 3, 2004, the stockholders approved an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to change thewe changed our name to StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. On November 15, 2010, we redomiciled under the laws of the State of Wyoming. We initially conducted operations as an integrator and reseller of computer hardware and telecommunications equipment and services until December 2002. In December 2002, and formally memorialized in September 2003, we acquired certain intellectual property rights and patent pending technology from NetLabs.com, Inc. (“NetLabs”) including the rights to further develop and sell their principal technology. In addition, certain officers of NetLabs joined our company as officers and directors of our company. We subsequently changed our name to StrikeForce Technologies, Inc., under which we have conducted our business since August 2003. Our ongoing strategy is developing and marketing our suite of network security products to the corporate, financial, healthcare, legal, government, technology, insurance, e-commerce and consumer sectors. We plan to continue to grow our business primarily through our globally expanding sales channel and internally generated sales, rather than by acquisitions. We have no subsidiaries and we conduct our operations from our corporate office in Edison, New Jersey.

 

We began our operations in 2001 as a reseller and integrator of computer hardware and iris biometric technology. From the time we started our operations through the first half of 2003, we derived the majority of our revenues as an integrator. In December 2002, upon the acquisition of the licensing rights to certain intellectual property and patent pending technology from NetLabs, we shifted the focus of our business to developing and marketing our own suite of security products. Based upon our acquired licensing rights and additional research and development, we have developed various identification protection software products to protect computer networks from unauthorized access and to protect network owners and users from identity theft.

We completed the development of our ProtectIDÒ platform at the end of June 2006, we completed the core development of our keyboard encryption and anti-keylogger product, GuardedIDÒ, in December 2006 and commenced deployment of our new mobile product, MobileTrustÒ into the mobile stores in 2015. All are currently being sold and distributed. ProtectIDÒ patent titled “Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System” is protected by three patents. The keystroke encryption technology we developed and use in our GuardedIDÒ product is protected by three patents. MobileTrustÒ has a patent pending, as of March 2013.

 

In November 2010, we received notice that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) had issued an official Notice of Allowance for the patent application for the technology relating to our ProtectID® product, titled "Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System".ProtectIDÒ product. In January 2011, we received notice that the USPTO issued to us Patent No. 7,870,599. This “Out-of-Band” Patent went through a USPTO Re-Examination process starting on August 16, 2011 and concluded on December 27, 2011, with all of our patent claims remaining intact and eight additional patent claims being added. Since 2011, we submitted additional continuation patents on the “Out-of-Band” Patent, two additional patents granted and a fourth pending. The keystroke encryption technology we developed and use in our GuardedID® product is protected by two patents and one continuation pending.

4
Table of Contents

 

In January 2013, we were assigned the entire right, title and interest in the “Out-of-Band Patent”“Out-of-Band” Patent from NetLabs, with the agreement of the developer, and the assignment was recorded with the USPTO.

 

In February 2013, we executed a retainer agreement with our patent attorneys to aggressively enforce our patent rights as “Out-of-Band Authentication” iswas becoming the standard for authenticating consumers in the financial market and for many Saas application users (e.g., SalesForce, Quickbooks, etc.). In February 2013, our patent attorneys submitted a new “Out-of-Band” Patent continuation, which has beenwas granted.

 

In March 2013, our patent attorneys submitted a new “Methods and Apparatus for securing user input in a mobile device” Patent, which is now patent pending. Our MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ product is the invention supporting the patent pending.

 

In July 2013, we received notice that the USPTO had added approximately sixty additional patent claims for our Out-of-Band patent we received in January 2011, by issuing to us Patent No. 8,484,698 thereby strengthening our position with clients and our current and potential lawsuits.

 


In October 2013, we received notice that the USPTO issued to us Patent No. 8,566,608 “Methods and apparatus for securing keystrokes from being intercepted between the keyboard and a browser.” This protects our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ product and the keystroke encryption portion of our MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ products.

 

In February 2014, we received a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for our third patent relating to our "Multi-Channel“Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System"System” Patent No. 7,870,599. Upon receipt of this Out-of-Band“Out-of-Band” patent we filed another continuation patent.

 

In March 2014, we received Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for our second patent and first continuation of our Keystroke Encryption patent, which only furthers our protection for all mobile devices when utilizing any keyboard for data entry. Upon receipt of this Notice, we also filed another continuation patent for Patent No. 8,566,608.

 

In April 2014, we were granted our third patent relating to our “Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System” Patent No. 8,713,701.

 

In September 2014, we filed an International Patent for MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ (PCT/US20114/029905).

 

We completedIn March 2015, we received our third patent from the developmentUSPTO, Patent No. 8,973,107, of our ProtectID® platform atKeystroke Encryption patent. This enhances our position for our Keystroke Encryption product, GuardedIDÒ, and our MobileTrustÒ product.

In December 2016, we executed a retainer agreement with a second patent attorney, to aggressively enforce our patent rights as “Out-of-Band Authentication” has become the end of June 2006, we completedstandard for authenticating consumers in the core development of our keyboard encryptionfinancial market and anti-keylogger product, GuardedID®for many Saas application users (e.g., in December 2006 and commenced deployment of our new mobile product, MobileTrust® into the mobile stores in 2014, of which the first two are currently being sold and distributed. SalesForce, Quickbooks, etc.).

Our suite of products is targeted to the financial, e-commerce, corporate, government, healthcare, legal, insurance, technology and retail sectors.markets. We seek to locate customers in a variety of ways. These primarily include contracts with value added resellers and distributors (both inside the United States and internationally), direct sales calls initiated by our internal staff, exhibitions at security and technology trade shows, through the media, through consulting agreements, and through our agent relationships. Our sales generate revenue either as an Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) model, through a Hosting/License agreement, bundled with other company’s products or through direct purchase by distributors and resellers. We price our products for cloud consumer transactions based on the number of transactions in which our software products are utilized. We also price our products for business applications based on the number of users. These pricing models provide our company with one-time, monthly, quarterly and annual recurring revenues with volume discounts. We are also generating revenues from annual maintenance contracts, renewal fees and expect, but cannot guarantee, an increase in revenues based upon the execution of various agreements that we have recently closed and were implemented during the fourth quarter of 2014,2016, primarily in the retail and insurance sectors.

5
Table of Contents

 

We generated all of our revenues of $324,807$384,289 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared2016 (compared to $434,657$271,559 for the year ended December 31, 2013,2015), from the sales of our security products. The decreaseincrease in revenues was primarily due to the decreaseincrease in the sales of our GuardedID® keyboard encryption (anti-keylogger) technology relating to our initiated litigation with one of our channel partners, WhiteSky, Inc. ("WhiteSky").software, services, maintenance and support sales. We also have realized delays in revenues from some of our new distributor’s that, although there can be no assurances, we anticipate will appear in the first half of 2015 future,fiscal 2017, and in the delayed rollout of our new mobile security technologies, that are now anticipated to rollrolling out through the Apple and Android markets during the second quarter of 2015. The lawsuit with WhiteSky was settled on March 9, 2015 with mutually agreed upon terms.markets. In addition, we rolled out our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ MAC version that is expected,we anticipate, but not guaranteed,cannot guarantee, that combined with the new mobile security technologies, will continue to increase our revenues during the second quarter of 2015in fiscal 2017 and thereafter. Therefore, we see strong opportunities for increased sales through 2015. Additionally, we believe we have opportunities through our sales distribution channels, including current pilots, which we believeanticipate, but cannot guarantee, should continue to increase revenues in 2015,2017 and thereafter, especially with the addition of our new mobile security products and new multi-marketing partners. Although we anticipate, but cannot guarantee, the additional revenues as discussed above will be realized in fiscal 2017.


 

We market our products globally to financial service firms, healthcare related companies, legal services companies, e-commerce companies, gaming, automotive, government agencies, multi-level marketing groups, the enterprise market in general, and with virtual private network companies, as well as technology service companies and retail distributors that service all the above markets. We seek such sales through our own direct efforts, with emphasis on retail, through distributors, resellers and third party agents internationally. We are also seeking to license the technology as original equipment with computer hardware and software manufacturers. We are engaged in multiple production installations and pilot projects with various distributors, resellers and direct customers primarily in the United States. Our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ product is also being sold directly to consumers, primarily through the Internet as well as distributors, resellers, third party agents, affiliates and potential OEM agreements by bundling GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ with their products (providing a value-add and competitive advantage to their own products and offerings). Currently this is the most active market for us with multiple programs in pre-production and some already in production. We anticipate, but cannot guarantee, continuing increases in revenues in 2015fiscal 2017 from these programs. In addition, we have completed the development and testing of our new mobile products, MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ and GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ Mobile Software Development Kit (SDK), which is almost completedin now available in the Apple Store and being prepared for sales in mobile online stores in, we expect, the second quarter of 2015, upon completion of our new sCloud registration process.Android Play Store. The mobile products play a major role in our anticipated, but not guaranteed, second quarter 2015fiscal 2017 revenue projections. Although no assurances can be provided that revenues will increase as anticipated, our GuardedID® MAC version, recently rolled out, is another reason for our anticipated, but not guaranteed, projected increase in revenues during the second quarter of 2015.

 

We have incurred substantial losses since our inception. Our management believes that our products provide a cost-effective more secure and technologically competitive solution to address the problems of cybernetwork security and data breachesidentity theft in general, especially when considering our new mobile applications. Considering recent public announcements by Symantecgeneral. Updated guidance for the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”) regulations include the requirement for solutions that have Two-Factor Out-of-Band Authentication and other media sourcesproducts that anti-virus solutions barely protect against the new malware threats, primarilystop keylogging malware, we contend thatreal time, which our keystroke encryption patentedmanagement believes our proprietary products are becoming more important, especiallyuniquely and directly address. This new updated guidance went into effect as of January 1, 2012. Based on this new requirement in the healthcarelatest FFIEC update that was published in June 2011 with enforcement commencing in January 2012, we have experienced a growing increase in sales orders and retail markets.inquiries every year. However, there can be no assurance that our products will continue to gain increased acceptance and continue to grow in the commercial and retail marketplacesmarketplace or that one of our competitors will not introduce technically superior products.

Because we are now experiencing a continual growing market demand, we are developing a sizeable global reseller and distribution channel as a strategy to generate, manage and fulfill demand for our products across market segments, minimizing the requirement for an increase in our staff as we grow our distributor market. We have minimized the concentration on our initial direct sales efforts as our distribution and reseller channels continue to grow internationally and will require appropriate levels of support.

On August 24, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Cyber Safety, Inc., a New York corporation (“Cyber Safety”) for Cyber Safety to license, and retain an option to purchase, the patents and Intellectual Property related to our GuardedIDÒ and MobileTrustÒ software. Cyber Safety purchased their option to buy our GuardedIDÒ patent for $9,000,000 to be paid by September 30, 2020. At December 31, 2016, the Company does not have an estimate if Cyber Safety will exercise its option to make the purchase. Cyber Safety will also resell the Company’s GuardedIDÒ and MobileTrustÒ products, for which the Company will receive a royalty, while the Company retains an unlimited license to resell those products.

6
Table of Contents

As a condition of the asset purchase agreement, Cyber Safety will license the Malware Suite (as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement) up to and until September 30, 2020. Pursuant to this license, Cyber Safety shall pay us 15% of the net amount Cyber Safety receives, as defined, which amount may be increased to 20% under certain conditions for ProtectIDÒ, and is subject to reduction for commissions and support costs that Cyber Safety will be obligated to pay to us.

 

Our executive office is located at 1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite 603, Edison, NJ 08837. Our telephone number is (732) 661-9641. We have 68 employees. Our Company’s website is www.strikeforcetech.com (we are not including the information contained in our website as part of, nor should the information be relied upon or incorporated by reference into, this report on Form 10-K).

 

Our Products

 

StrikeForce is a software development and services company. We own and are seeking to commercially exploit various identification protection software products that we developed to protect computer networks from unauthorized access, real time, and to protect network owners and users from cyber security attacks and data breaches. Our principal products ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ, GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ, inclusive of our unique CryptoColor®CryptoColorÒ technology and MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ, are proprietary authentication and keystroke encryption technologies that are intended to eliminate unauthorized access to computer networks and all mobile devices, and to prevent unauthorized individuals from copying (logging) keystrokes. We are increasing our market for our suite of products in the financial services, e-commerce, corporate, healthcare, government and consumer sectors. Our cyber security products are as follows:

 

·o

ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ is our multi-patented authentication platform that uses “Out-of-Band” multi-factor in-house installation, cloud service technology and a hybrid to authenticate computer network users by a variety of methods including traditional passwords combined with a telephone, iPhone, Droid, Blackberry, PDA, or multiple computer secure sessions, biometric identification and encrypted devices such as tokens or smartcards as examples. The authentication procedure separates authentication information such as usernames from the pin/passwords or biometric information, which are then provided to or from the network’s host server across separate communication channels. The platform allows for corporate control and client choices, per their company’s security policies, which evolves over time with newly available and customer requested technologies. (Patent Nos:7,870,599, 8,484,698, and 8,713,701 and one patent pending for Out-of-Band Authentication).

·o

GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ creates a 256-bit AES encrypted real time separate pathway for information delivery from a keyboard to a targeted application on a local computer, preventing the use of spyware/malware to collect user information. This product provides keyboard encryption and helps prevent keylogging from occurring in real time, which helps prevent the number one threat to consumers and businesses in today’s market: keylogging software, which is stealth software embedded in web sites, emails, pictures, MP3 files, videos, USB’s or other software and hardware that, once unknowingly launched, secretly monitors and records all of a user's keystrokes on the computer and sends the data to the cyber thief without the user’s awareness. Keylogging has been reported as the one of the major causes of major data breaches that occurred from 2010 to 2014,2016, as reported in the 2010-20142010-2016 Verizon Data Breach Reports. (Patent No: 8,566,608, 8,732,483 and 8,973,107).

 


 

·o

MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ (Patent Pending) is an advanced iPhone/iPad and Android device password vault that includes a strong password generator. MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ also provides for Mobile Multi-Factor One Time Password authentication, a secured browser and keystroke encryption between its virtual keyboard and secured browser, which is critical to all confidential online transactions and other features, which is now in final Beta.production. This new feature for mobile devices, which helps prevent data breaches and stolen credentials is a critical and vital addition to all enterprise mobile users, as enterprises transition to “Bring Your Own Devices” (BYOD).

·o

GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ Mobile SDK is a software development kit that provides developers our patent protected keystroke encryption protection for all Apple and Android mobile device’s secure keyboards, allowing our keystroke encryption software to be embedded in any mobile applications, utilizing DES 256 Encryption.

 

Our products sometimes include software and hardware that we contractually license from other vendors. These products include VASCO (an authentication and e-signature solutions company) tokens, as well as additional authentication and telecommunication software devices. ProtectID®We also purchase tokens and devices from HyperSecurity Solutions in Canada. ProtectIDÒ also uses a software product for its Voice Biometric Out-of-Band method through a partnership with Trade Harbor©.Harbor.

 

The ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ Cloud Service can be hosted by our service provider (we have a strategic arrangement with a third party SAS70 hosting service) as well as the ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ Out-of-Band and Multi-Factor Platform, which can be installed internally in a customer’s infrastructure or as a hybrid implementation. With the exception of our free redistributable Microsoft software components, our reseller agreementagreements with VASCO and HyperSecurity Solutions, and our partnership with Trade Harbor, none of our contracts for hardware or software are with a sole supplier of that feature or product.

 

7
Table of Contents

Factors that are considered important to our success include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

·

o

Our productsaddress the needs of a broad variety of customers for authentication and cyber security overall. One of the biggest problems facing the world is Cyber Theft, the effects of which, our management contends, total an estimated $221 billion per year in business losses and more recently, based on anecdotal evidence provided to management, stated to be in the trillions going forward.

o

·

Symantec reported there were over 401 million new pieces of Spyware found over the past year.

o

·

48% of all data breaches were caused by key loggers (malware copying keystrokes), as reported by the Verizon 2012 Data Breach Report. Similar percentages are reported in the Verizon 20132014 report, recently published. All of the companies breached, per these reports, had an anti-virus program installed.

o

·

In 2011, it was reported that RSA Security’s data was breached from which Lockheed Martin and others were affected and lost millions of dollars. This event caused many companies to look to other means of two-factor authentication, such as Out-of-Band. The RSA Data Breach started with a keylogging virus which our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ product, management believes would most likely would have prevented.

o

·

In February 2013, Computerworld reported that the Federal Government put security on the frontline of IT agendas with its announcement of a new cyber security center in Canberra, AU and an additional $1.46 billion in funding for cyber security as part of a new national security blueprint.

o

·

In respect to the latest version of our keyboard encryption and anti-keylogger Product, GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ, a recent report from a government security group known as CERT states that minimally 80%of the malicious keylogging programs are undetected by the major anti-virus software suites. Our Guarded ID®IDÒ is designed, we believe, to render the malicious programs useless, in real time.

o

·

In June 2013, PhoneArena.com, The Multiple Threat Center of Juniper Networks, found mobile malware growing exponentially at an alarming rate – a 614% one year increase reaching a total of just about 280,000 malicious apps.

o

·

In February 2015, the New York Times reported that a Global Bank heist occurred in banks around the globe from a keylogger. This was the first known time that a large hack was reported with the details which included a keylogger that our management believes GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ would have most likely prevented.

The article was noted as caused by keystroke encryption in a picture on the front page of the New York Times.

·

o

The Effectiveness of Our Products: Our products have been designed to provide, we believe, a high available level of security for computer networks and individual users. In particular, we believe that the now Patented “Out-of-Band” authentication process is an innovative technology that will greatly prevent unauthorized access to computer networks and will provide effective security products to drastically reduce the incidence of identity fraud for our customers. We have contractually commenced implementation of our products on a large global scale, yet there can be no assurance that they will function in all aspects as intended. Likewise, a high level of innovation characterizes the software industry and there can be no assurance that our competitors will not develop and introduce a superior product. The effective functioning of our products once deployed is an important factor in our future success. To date and our knowledge, all of our clients have reported, per a report by Research 2.0, that our products work as described.

o

·

Ability to Integrate our Software with Customer Environments: There are numerous operating systems that are used by computer networks. The ability of a software product to integrate with multiple operating systems is likely to be a significant factor in customer acceptance of particular products. StrikeForce’s ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ operates on an independent Cloud Service platform and is also able to integrate with multiple operating systems and user interfaces for an in-house implementation. ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ has been designed to use multiple authentication devices that are currently on the market (including, but not limited to, biometrics, key-fob tokens, iPhones, iPads, Blackberrys, Androids, PDA’s, smart cards and other mobile devices). Our ability to integrate our products with multiple existing and future technologies is currently a key factor in the growth of our product’s acceptance and is demonstrated by our success with recent clients and installations referred to in a number of our 20142015 and 2016 press releases. Our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ product currently operates with Windows Internet Explorer (IE), Firefox, Chrome and Safari browsers and our upgraded Premium version works with almost all applications running on a Windows desktop platform, inclusive of Microsoft Office and now also the MAC. New features and functions for both products continue to be developed via our research and development. We are also in final Beta testingnow live with our MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ and GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ Mobile SDK products, with production anticipated within a few months.which work on all Apple and Android devices.

o

·

Relative Cost: We have attempted to design our products to provide a cost-effective suite of products for financial services, e-commerce, commercial, healthcare, government and direct-consumer customers. Our ability to offer our products at a competitive price and to add to existing installations is likely in our opinion, to be a key factor in the acceptance of our product as we have seen with many of our clients.

8
Table of Contents

 

Business Model

 

We are focusing primarily on developing sales through “channel” relationships in which our products are offered by other manufacturers, distributors, value-added resellers and agents, internationally. In 2014,2016, we added and publicly announced additions to our global distribution sales channel, which provides additional presence for us in the United States, Canada, Europe and Africa. We continue to add additional channel partners, especially on the consumer side.side and developed a new retail business. We also sell our suite of security products directly from our Edison, New Jersey office, which also augments our channel partner relationships. It is our strategy that these “channel” relationships will provide the greater percentage of our revenues ongoing, as was the case in the past two years. Examples of the channel relationships that we are seeking include already established original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and bundled relationships with other security technology and software providers that would integrate or bundle the enhanced security capabilities of ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ, GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ and/or MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ into their own product lines, including our MobileTrustÒ SDK, thereby providing greater value to their clients. These would include providers of networking software and manufacturers of computer and telecommunications hardware and software that provide managed services, and multi-level marketing groups, as well as all markets interested in increasing the value of their products and packages, such as financial services software, anti-virus, government integrators and identity theft product companies. We signed various new distributors during the fourth quarter of 20142016 and we anticipate, but cannot guarantee, an increase in revenues in 2017. Additionally, in February 2016, Advanced Cyber Security (“ACS”) purchased their option to buy our GuardedIDÒ patent for nine million dollars ($9,000,000) to be paid by September 30, 2020, and will resell our GuardedIDÒ and MobileTrustÒ products, for which we will receive a royalty, while we retain a perpetual license to resell those products. The distributors have high expectations for 2015, resulting from these distribution relationships.already obtained new clients and we expect, but cannot guarantee, that more clients will be obtained in fiscal 2017 and thereafter. There is no guarantee as to the timing and success of these business relationships.relationships or reaching our self-imposed expectations.


 

From our MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ security new mobile application, which is now completed andbuilt with our sCloud registration process, in production, we have created and announced two new products: our new ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ Mobile OTP (One Time Password) to be used with ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ; and our new GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ Mobile keystroke encryption software development kit (SDK). We anticipate that bothBoth new products will beare now in production during the second quarter of 2015.production. With the creation of this new GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ Mobile SDK, we intend tonow focus the sales of this software product to the development groups of our target markets for it to be added to their mobile applications. We are in discussions with many large-scale parties that are interested in this software. Management has already received requests for this software, including for mobile devices, as keystroke encryption malware continues to growgrows and remainremains a major problem for the cybermobile-cyber security market. Particularly, in management’s estimation,market, particularly with anti-virus products being seenviewed as non-effective against malware threats.

 

Our primary target markets include financial services such as banks and insurance companies, healthcare providers, legal services, government agencies through integrators, technology platforms, e-commerce based services companies, telecommunications and cellular carriers, technology software companies, government agencies and consumers, especially for our mobile and keystroke encryptionsencryption products. We are focusing our concentration on cyber security and data breach strategic problem areas, such as where compliance with financial, healthcare, legal and government regulations are key and stolen passwords are used to acquire private information illegally. We executed a multi-year contract with a healthcare facility who utilizes our ProtectID® solution for its employees and administrators. The contract became revenue producing in the first quarter of 2012 for a three year auto-renewable term and is still in effect. During the second half of 2012, we signed on additional distributors and resellers from which we started to generate revenues in 2013 and 2014, as they commenced implementing their sales strategies for our products. In the fourth quarter of 2014, a number2016, several of our channel partners had pilots and client implementations in place that are expected, although no assurances can be provided, to continue to increase our revenues in 2015. With our-2017. Our mobile products commencingwent into production induring the secondfirst quarter of 2015, we anticipate, but cannot guarantee, increased2016 and the revenues in 2015.Thererelated to those products are increasing, primarily as results of the efforts of our channel partners, Advanced Cyber Security and others. There is no guarantee as to the timing and continued success of these efforts.

 

Because we are now experiencingexpecting a continual, recurring growing market demand, especially in the mobility and encryption retail markets, we continue to develop an increasing global reseller and distribution channel as a strategy to generate, manage and fulfill demand for our products across market segments, minimizing the requirement for an increase in our staff.staff as we grow our distributor market for which we now have 8 employees from 6. We continue to minimize the concentration on our initial direct sales efforts as our distribution and reseller channels continue to grow internationally and provide appropriate levels of sales and support into the growing Cyber Security market.

9
Table of Contents

 

We seek to generate revenue through fees for ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ based on client consumer usage in the financial, healthcare services and legal services markets, as well as enterprises in general, through our Cloud Service, plus one-time and annual per person fees in the enterprise markets which often are for in-house installations of our products, and set-up and recurring transaction fees when the product is accessed in our Cloud Service, along with annual maintenance fees, and other one-time and recurring fees. We have also implemented our new ProtectIDÒ v2.3, which includes our Mobile One-Time-Password. We also intend to generate revenues through sales of our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ product. GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ pricing is for an annual license and we discount for volume purchases. GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ pricing models, especially when bundling through OEM contracts, include monthly and quarterly recurring revenues. As more agreements are reached by our distributors, we are experiencing monthly increasing sales growth, through the execution of GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ bundled OEM agreements. We also provide our clients a choice of operating our ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ software internally by licensing it or through our hosted Cloud Service or a hybrid that some clients have implemented and none of our competitors presently offer. GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ requires a download on each and every computer it protects, whether for employees or consumers. We have four GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ products, (i) a standard version which protects browser data entry only, (ii) a premium version which protects almost all the applications running under Microsoft Windows on the desktop, including Microsoft Office Suite and almost all applications running on the desktop, (iii) an Enterprise version which, in addition, provides the Enterprise administrative rights and the use of Microsoft’s Enterprise tools for the product’s deployment, and (iv) an Apple MAC version for all the latest MAC operating systems and for the browsers and entire desktop. Our MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ mobile product will be priced for the consumer through the appropriate mobile phone stores, as well as direct, distribution and OEM sales for higher volume enterprises, including volume discounts to the degree allowed by the telecommunications providers. Our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ Mobile SDK (software development kit) will be priced on an annual recurring fee based on volume and numberwent to the open market in the second quarter of users or an enterprise plus maintenance price.2016. We anticipate, but can provide no assurances, that these newcannot guarantee, steadily increasing revenues from this product offerings will result in the largest number of sales and related revenues for us in fiscal 2015.offering.

 

Our management believes that our products provide a cost-effective and technologically competitive solution to address the increasing problems of network security and cyber security in general. Updated guidance for the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council(“FFIEC”) regulations include the requirement for solutions that have Two-Factor Out-of-Band Authentication and products that stop keylogging malware, real time, which our management believes our proprietary products uniquely and directly address. This new updated guidance went into effect as of January 1, 2012. Additionally, the 20142015 Verizon Data Breach report, published in April 2015 ,2016, stated that 80% of all the data breaches they reported would not have occurred if the corporations used two factor authentication, such as our ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ system. The report also indicates that over 79% of the data breaches would most likely not have occurred if the corporations breached used anti-keylogging software, other thansuch as our GuardedIDÒ system in addition to the typical anti-virus programs. Based on the FFIEC requirement, in the latest FFIEC update that was published in June 2011 (being enforced as of January 2012) the latest Verizon Data Breach Report and the new articles from the White House urging law firms and legal services firms to add two factor authentication, we have recently experienced a growing increase in pilots and sales orders and inquiries specifically in the financial and legal markets. In January 2014, PCI Compliance published an update that includes the requirement for not only encrypting data at rest, but also to encrypt data in motion including the keystrokes users enter in their device. Additionally, Symantec's senior vice-president for information security, Brian Dye, told the Wall Street Journal that anti-virus "is dead"“is dead”, in an article published in May 2014. However, there can be no assurance that our products will continue to gain acceptance and continue to grow in the commercial marketplace or that one of our competitors will not introduce technically superior products.

 


Marketing

 

Our multi-channel marketing strategy includes:

 

1.

Direct sales to enterprise and commercial customers. In this effort, we attend

1. Direct sales to enterprise and commercial customers. In this effort, we joined ACS at the RSA Security Show, annually as well as attending other security related shows and we are looking at other sales alternatives in order to respond aggressively to inquiries related shows and we are looking at other inside sales alternatives in order to respond aggressively to inquiries relating to our products.

2. The global addition of resellers, agents & distributors (our strategic sales channel) who distribute and resell our products and services to enterprise and commercial customers globally (technology and software product distributors, systems integrators, managed service companies, other security technology and software vendors, telecom companies, cyber security related product companies, etc.).

3. Application Service Provider (ASP) Partners: Our third-party service provides a hosting platform that facilitates faster implementations at competitive prices for our Cloud Service option.

4. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM): SFT products are sold to other security technology vendors that integrate ProtectIDÒ, GuardedIDÒ and now GuardedIDÒ Mobile SDK into their products (bundling) and services providing for monthly/annual increasing recurring revenues.

5. Internet sites and retail stores, such as Target, Office Depot, Amazon and Best Buy that sell GuardedIDÒ and MobileTrustÒ to consumers and small enterprises online and in the stores.

10

2.

The global addition of resellers, agents & distributors (our strategic sales channel) who distribute and resell our products and services to enterprise and commercial customers globally (technology and software product distributors, systems integrators, managed service companies, other security technology and software vendors, telecom companies, identity theft related product companies, etc.).

Table of Contents

3.

Application Service Provider (ASP) Partners: Our certified SAS 70 third party service provides a hosting platform that facilitates faster implementations at competitive prices for our Cloud Service option.

4.

Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM): SFT products are sold to other security technology vendors that integrate ProtectID® and GuardedID® and now GuardedID® Mobile SDK into their products (bundling) and services providing for monthly/annual increasing recurring revenues or other models as the SDK is intended to enter the market in mid-2015

5.

Internet sites that sell GuardedID® to consumers and small enterprises, such as affiliates.

6.

Technology and other providers and resellers, agents and distributors interested in purchasing and or selling our new MobileTrust® cyber solution for all mobile devices, initially for all Apple and Android devices, that will be in production during mid-2015.

7.

6. Technology and other providers and resellers, agents and distributors interested in purchasing and or selling our new MobileTrustÒ cyber solution for all mobile devices, initially for all Apple and Android devices (production started in 2016).

7. Outside Independent consultants selling our products for commission only, focusing on the healthcare, legal and consumer markets.

 

Our sCloudCloud service provider is Hosting.com and we have been under contract with them since December 2007 when we executed an agreement with a nationwide premier data center and co-location services provider who functions as an Application Service Provider for our ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ, GuardedIDÒ and GuardedID®MobileTrustÒ products, which require a secondary server used for the “Out-of-Band” two-factor authentication technology. We believe that this relationship improves the implementation time, reduces the cost and training requirements, and allows for ease of scalability, with hot backups in multiple locations across the U.S., on an as needed basis. Our sCloud site is also SAS 70 (Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 70) certified, which is critical to providing a secure compliant service that is required by most of our clients. Our agreement with the services provider was for a one-year (1) term, initially ending in December 2008 and renewing automatically for one-year (1) terms, and is still in effect. The relationship can be terminated by either party on sixty daysdays’ written notice. The cloud service is based on a flat monthly fee per the terms of the contract that can increase as we require additional services.

 

Intellectual Property

 

We are working with ourtwo patent attorneysattorney firms to aggressively continue to enforce our patent rights, per the terms of a retainer agreement executednow that we have successfully settled our first major patent lawsuit, in February 2013.January 2016. Our patent attorneys also filed third andour fourth “Out of Band” continuation patents. The third patent was recently granted and the fourth patent is pending. We currently have three patents granted to us for Out-of-Band ProtectIDÒ(Patent Nos.: 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701). In March 2013, our patent attorneys submitted a new “Methods and Apparatus for securing user input in a mobile device” Patent, which is now patent pending. Our MobileTrustÒ product is the invention supporting the patent pending. In September 2014, we filed an International Patent for MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ (PCT/US20114/029905), which is pending.

 

We are also working with ourtwo patent attorneysattorney firms to plan our strategy to aggressively enforce ourthe patent rights relating to our newly granted Keystroke Encryption patents that help protect our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ and MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ products. We were granted our firstthree related keystroke encryption patent and were granted our second keystroke encryption patentpatents for GuardedID®. Our patent attorneys also filed a third Keystroke Encryption patent, which we just received the most recent patent on March 3, 2015 (Patent Nos.: 8,566,608, 8,732,483 and 8,973,107). In February 2016, a channel partner exercised their option to purchase our GuardedIDÒ patents, and MobileTrustÒ patent pendings, and products, which requires them to pay us $9,000,000 for the patents by September 30, 2020, in addition to royalties on sales.

 

We have four trademarks that have been approved and registered: ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ, GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ, MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ and CryptoColor®CryptoColorÒ. A portion of our software is licensed from third parties and the remainder is developed by our own team of developers while leveraging some external consultant expertise as necessitated. We rely upon confidentiality agreements signed by our employees, consultants and third parties to protect the intellectual property rights.


 

We license technology from third parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions. We anticipate that we will continue to license technology from third parties in the future. Although we are not substantially dependent on any individual licensed technology, some of the software that we license from third parties could be difficult for us to replace. The effective implementation of our products depends upon the successful operation of third-party licensed products in conjunction with our suite of products, and therefore any undetected errors in these licensed products could create delays in the implementation of our products, impair the functionality of our products, delay new product introductions, damage our reputation, and/or cause us to provide substitute products.

 

Business Strategy

 

We could incur significant additional costs beforeWhile we become profitable.will most likely continue to post operating deficits, our year to date 2016 results show an overall net income, due to the award we received from the confidential settlement of our first major patent remediation litigation. Most of the costs that we incur are related to salaries, professional fees, marketing, sales and research & design. We have increased our sales efforts by retaining a consultant, and we have increased our technology staff by contracting an outsourced firm.hiring a software engineer in January 2016. Our operations presently require funding of approximately $110,000$150,000 per month. We expect that our monthly cash usage for operations will increase slightly due to contracted and anticipated increased volumes and adding some targeted channel marketing programs. We anticipate that the areas in which we will experience the greatest increase in operating expenses is in marketing, selling, product support, product research and new technology development in the growing cyber security market. We are committed to maintaining our current level of operating costs until we reach the level of revenues needed to absorb any potential increase in costs.

 

11
Table of Contents

Our primary strategy during the last quarter of 2014throughout 2016 and continuing throughout 2015into fiscal 2017 is to focus on the growth and support of our channel partners, including distributors, resellers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Our internal sales team targets potential direct sales in industries that management believes provides the greatest potential for short term sales. These include small to medium sized financial institutions, government agencies, e-commerce, healthcare, legal and enterprise businesses. We are also executing agreements with strategic resellers and distributors for marketing, selling and supporting our products internationally. We primarily work with distributors, resellers and agents to generate the bulk of our sales internationally, realizing that this strategy takes longer to nurture, however it is progressing well. We are starting to realize positive results, however slowly, with our sales channel and look forward toanticipate, but cannot guarantee, a very successful 2015fiscal 2017, through the sales channel and from our new mobile and GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ MAC products with a concentration of sales already contracted. There can be no assurances, however, that we will succeed in implementing our sales strategy. Although management believes that there is an increasingly strong market for our products as the need for cyber security solutions increases globally, as supported by the RSA Security Show responses we received in February 2014, we have not generated substantial revenue from the sale of our products and there is no assurance we can secure a market sufficient to permit us to achieve profitability in the next twelve months.fiscal 2017.

 

Competition

 

The software development and services market is characterized by innovation and competition. There are several well-established companies within the authentication market that offer network security systems in our product market and newer companies with emerging technologies. We believe that our multi-patented “Out-of-Band” multi-factor identity authentication platform is an innovative, secure, adaptable, competitively priced, integrated network authentication platform. The main features of ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ include: an open architecture “Out-of-Band” platform for user authentication; operating system independence; biometric layering; soft mobile tokens; mobile authentication; secure website logon; Virtual Private Network (“VPN”) access; domain authentication; newly added Office 365 authentication and multi-level authentication. Unlike other techniques for increased network security, ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ does not rely on a specific authentication device or method (e.g., phone, tokens, smart cards, digital certificates, soft mobile tokens, or biometrics, such as a retinal or fingerprint scan). Rather ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ has been developed as an “open platform” that incorporates an unlimited number of authentication devices and methods. For example, once a user has been identified to a computer network, a system deploying our ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ authentication system permits the “Out-of-Band” authentication of that user by a telephone, iPhone, iPad, Blackberry, PDA, email, hard token, SSL client software, a biometric device such as a voice biometric, or others, before that user is permitted to access the network. By using “Out-of-Band” authentication methods, management believes that ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ, now patented and protected through our ongoing litigation, with plans for additional litigation, provides a competitive product for customers with security requirements greater than typical name and password schemes for virtual private networks and computer systems with multiple users at remote locations, as examples. We also believe that our multi-patented keystroke encryption product, GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ, offers an additional competitive edge for network security and e-commerce applications that should provide greater levels of security and the ability to evolve over time based on newer technologies when made available. There is less competition for the keystroke encryption product and there are no well-established companies in this space, which explains our current growth in pilots and sales for GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ, especially relating to bundled channel partner programs. GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ is critical to help prevent key logging viruses, one of the largest sources of cyber attackscyberattacks and data breaches. GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ also is protected with two patents and one pending.three patents. Our newest product, MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ, is ideal for bringing the functionality of our other two products, especially including keystroke encryption, to all mobile devices, with initial focus on all Apple and Android devices. This product is also protected with our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ patents and some of its features and functions are covered by the Out-of-Band Authentication patent. We also filed an international patent for MobileTrustÒ. Our other new mobile product is GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ Mobile SDK, which allows our secured keyboard function as a software development kit for developers to purchase and integrate as part of their secured applications. Considering the features and functions, all of our cyber solutions have limited competition based on our products’ ability to protect individual identities and computers/devices against some of the most dangerous and increasing threats. We also have great demand for the mobile products, which are being marketed to all potential new clients.

 


Although we believe that our suite of products offeroffers competitive advantages, there is no assurance that any of these products will continue to increase its market share in the marketplace. Our competitors include established software and hardware companies that are likely to be better financed and to have established sales channels. Due to the high level of innovation in the software development industry, it is also possible that a competitor will introduce a product that provides a higher level of security than our products or which can be offered at prices that are more advantageous to the customer.

 

Employees

 

As of fiscal year end December 31, 2014,2016, we had 68 employees and our relations with employees are good.

12
Table of Contents

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

You are advised to read this Form 10-K in conjunction with other reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. In particular, please read our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K that we file from time to time. You may obtain copies of these reports directly from us or from the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain information about obtaining access to the Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains information for electronic filers at its website http://www.sec.gov.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

Our business is subjectThe risk factors required pursuant to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including, butRegulation S-K, Item 503(c) are not limitedrequired for smaller reporting companies. Accordingly, the Company has determined to theprovide particular risk factors at this time. The risks and uncertainties described below. If any ofbelow are not the risks described below, or elsewhere in this report on Form 10-K, or our Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), were to occur, our financial condition and results of operations could suffer and the trading price of our common stock could decline. Additionally, if other risks not presently known to us, oronly ones facing us. Other events that we do not currently believe to be significant, occuranticipate or become significant,that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our financial condition and results of operations and financial condition. If any events described in the risk factors actually occur, our business, operating results, prospects and financial condition could suffer andbe materially harmed. In connection with the trading price of our common stock could decline. Youforward looking statements that appear elsewhere in this annual report, you should also carefully review the risk factors together with all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in prior reports pursuantcautionary statement referred to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item but are, providing certain risk factors, including but not limited to the risk factors listed below, as follows:under “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements.”

 

SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS OF OUR BUSINESS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, EXPECTED, INTENDED OR PLANNED.

 

WE HAVE A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY WITH SIGNIFICANT LOSSES AND EXPECT LOSSESOUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM HAS EXPRESSED SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. SHOULD WE CONTINUEAS A GOING CONCERN, WHICH MAY HINDER OUR ABILITY TO INCUR LOSSES FOR A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME, THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED, AND YOU COULD EVEN LOSE YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT.OBTAIN FUTURE FINANCING.

 

We have yet to establish any history of profitable operations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we incurred a loss from operations of $2,442,620 and at December 31, 2016, we had a stockholders’ deficit of $8,439,490. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as shown ina going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. As a result, our independent certifiedregistered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial audits for 2014statements as of and 2013. As of December 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $35,450,143. We incurred annual operating losses of $2,410,926 for the year ended December 31, 20132016 with respect to this uncertainty. This going concern opinion could materially limit our ability to raise additional funds through the issuance of new debt or equity securities and $3,350,230 for the year endedfuture reports on our financial statements may also include an explanatory paragraph with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern.

At December 31, 2014. We have financed2016, we had cash on hand in the amount of $804,130. Management estimates that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations approximately through the next six months. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our operationsability to raise additional funds and implement our business plan. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through loans from our officers, employees, and the issuance of debt and equity securities for cash and proceeds relating to our patent lawsuits to operate our business. Currently, management is attempting to increase revenues and improve gross margins by a revised sales strategy. We are redirecting our sales focus from direct sales to domestic and international sales channel, where we are primarily selling through a channel of Distributors, Value Added Resellers, Strategic Partners and Original Equipment Manufacturers. While we believe in private placement transactions. Our revenues have not been sufficient to sustain our operations. Our profitability will require the successful marketing and saleviability of our ProtectID®, GuardedID®strategy to increase revenues and MobileTrust® products and services.

WE WILL NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDS THROUGH THE PUBLIC MARKET, PRIVATE DEBT OR PRIVATE SALES OF EQUITY TO ACHIEVE OUR CURRENT BUSINESS STRATEGY OF COMPLETING AND PROFITING FROM OUR SUITE OF TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS. OUR NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDS IN THE FUTURE WILL LIKELY INVOLVE THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL SHARES OF STOCK, WHICH COULD DILUTE THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT. THERE IS NO ASSURANCE, HOWEVER, THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO RAISE ADDITIONAL MONIES IN THE FUTURE.

We will require additional financing to sustainin our operations, without which we may not be able to continue operations. In addition, the terms of the secured convertible debentures issued to certain investors require that we obtain the consent of such investors prior to our entering into subsequent financing arrangements. Our inabilityability to raise additional working capital orfunds, there can be no assurances to raise the required financing inthat effect. Our ability to continue as a timely manner would negatively impactgoing concern is dependent upon our ability to fundcontinually increase our operations, our ability to generatecustomer base and realize increased revenues and to otherwise execute our business plan.from recently signed contracts. No assurance can be given that weany future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to us. Even if we are able to obtain additional financing, that we will be able to obtain additional financingit may contain undue restrictions on terms that are favorable to us or that the holders of the secured debentures will provide their consent to permit us to enter into subsequent financing arrangements. This can lead to the reduction or suspension of our operations, and ultimately our going out of business. Should this occur, the value of your investment in the common stock could be adversely affected, and you could lose your entire investment.


WE HAVE ISSUED SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES THAT MAY RESTRICT OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FINANCING.

We issued three-year and two-year secured debentures in 2004 and 2005 that are convertible into sharescase of our common stock to D.A.R.T. Limited (“DART”), the custodiandebt financing or cause substantial dilution for Citco Global Custody, NV (“Citco Global”) (as assigned by YA Global Investments, LP (“YA Global”), formerly Cornell Capital Partners, LP, and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. respectively. Under the terms of the secured debentures, we are restricted in our ability to issue additional securities as long as any portion of the principal or interest on the secured debentures remains outstanding. Specifically, we may not, without the prior consent of the holders of the secured debentures, issue any common stock or preferred stock at a discount to its fair market value or issue any derivative security, such as common stock purchase warrants or options, convertible into common stock at less than fair market value. We are also precluded under the terms of the secured debentures from granting any third party a security interest in our assets. Our inability, without the secured debenture holders’ consent, to provide a discount on our stock or to grant a security interest could make it difficult to find parties willing to make additional investments in us or to loan us money and therefore could adversely affect our ability to raise additional funds.

SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES ISSUED TO D.A.R.T. LIMITED (“DART”), THE CUSTODIAN FOR CITCO GLOBAL CUSTODY, NV (AS ASSIGNED BY YA GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, LP, FORMERLY CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP, AND HIGHGATE HOUSE FUNDS, LTD) COULD RESULT IN A CHANGE IN CONTROL.

SUMMARY OF OUR OUTSTANDING SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

At December 31, 2014, $542,588 in aggregate principal amount of the DART/Citco Global debentures, as assigned by YA Global and Highgate in April 2009, was issued and outstanding.

HISTORY OF OUR OUTSTANDING DART/CITCO GLOBAL SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

Our outstanding convertible secured notes payable are secured through the note holder's claim on our intellectual property.

We have issued an aggregate of $1,774,876 in secured convertible debentures, including an aggregate of $1,024,876 principal amount secured debentures issued to YA Global Investments, LP and an aggregate of $750,000 principal amount secured debentures issued to Highgate House Funds, Ltd., which are convertible into shares of our common stock at an amount equal to the lesser of: (i) 120% of the average closing bid price for the 5 trading days immediately preceding the closing date (the “YA Global Fixed Conversion Price” and, together with the Highgate Fixed Conversion Price, the “Fixed Conversion Price”); or (ii) 80% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock during the five days preceding the conversion date. In July, 2006, the YA Global and Highgate Fixed Conversion Price was reduced to $82,875, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, in connection with an anti-dilution adjustment.

Although the terms of the secured debentures contain a limitation that precludes conversion when the amount of shares already owned by YA Global Investments, LP and Highgate House Funds, Ltd., plus the amount of shares still outstanding to be converted, would exceed 4.99 percent, the limit may be waived by YA Global Investments, LP on 61 days notice to us and by Highgate House Funds, Ltd on 65 days notice to us. In addition, after the third anniversary (at maturity) of the issuance date of the YA Global Investments, LP debenture and second anniversary (at maturity) of the issuance dates of the Highgate House Funds, Ltd. debentures, any outstanding principal or interest owed on the secured debentures may be continued to be converted, at the option of the Holder, into stock with the same limitation. Depending on the price of our stock, if YA Global Investments, LP waived the 4.99 percent limitation, YA Global Investments, LP or Highgate House Funds, Ltd. could acquire enough shares to establish control of our Company.


In January 2008, we executed a Forbearance Agreement with YA Global whereby YA Global and Highgate agreed to forbear from exercising their rights under the secured convertible debentures through February 27, 2008. The terms of the Forbearance Agreement record the amount due to YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd by us to be $1,214,093, which includes principal, interest and the redemption premium. The terms also include a reductionholders, in the YA Global and Highgate Fixed Conversion Price to $63,375, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. In connection with this Agreement, we issued to YA Global 500,000 contingency common stock purchase warrants with an exercise pricecase of $0.15 per share. The common stock purchase warrants are exercisable for a period of five (5) years from date of issuance. The common stock purchase warrants were held in escrow and will only be released to YA Global if the total amount due by us was not paid to YA Global by February 29, 2008. The total amount of our indebtedness to YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. in the amount of $1,214,093, as agreed to in the Forbearance Agreement, is further broken down as:

·

$427,447 (YA Global secured convertible debenture)

·

$204,775 (YA Global accrued and unpaid interest on debenture)

·

$85,489 (YA Global 20% redemption premium)

·

$244,720 (Highgate House Funds, Ltd. secured convertible debenture)

·

$86,937 (Highgate House Funds, Ltd. accrued and unpaid interest on debentures)

·

$48,944 (Highgate House Funds, Ltd. 20% redemption premium)

·

$100,000 (YA Global promissory note dated May 1, 2006)

·

$15,781 (YA Global accrued and unpaid interest on note)

In February 2008, the Forbearance Agreement was amended and extended to May 15, 2008, including the terms of the contingency common stock purchase warrants. Per the terms of the amendment, YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. shall receive an additional 105 days of interest for a total amount of $28,328.84 additional interest. The additional interest plus a security deposit of $171,671.16 were paid to YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. per the terms of a debt assignment agreement executed with the StrikeForce Investor Group (“SIG”) in February 2008, for a total amount paid to YA Global of $200,000. The security deposit will be applied to the amount due YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. e if the remaining balance is paid in full by May 15, 2008. Otherwise, the security deposit will be applied to YA Global as liquidated damages.

In May 2008, we executed a Forbearance Agreement with YA Global that supersedes the January 2008 agreement and February 2008 amendment, whereby YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. have agreed to forbear from exercising their rights under the secured convertible debentures through October 15, 2008. Per the terms of the May 2008 Forbearance Agreement, we agreed to use its best efforts to make available sufficient authorized shares of its common stock to effect conversion of the entire amount outstanding, to YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd., by October 15, 2008. The terms of the contingency common stock purchase warrants became applicable to the terms of the May 2008 Forbearance Agreement. Additionally, per the terms of the agreement, the SIG paid $75,000 to YA Global in May 2008 which is further broken down as:

·

$17,268 (additional prepaid interest to YA Global from May 15, 2008 to October 15, 2008)

·

$7,181 (additional prepaid interest to Highgate House Funds, Ltd. from May 15, 2008 to October 15, 2008)

·

$27,840 (accrued interest due on the Highgate House Funds, Ltd. debenture dated April 26, 2005)

·

$22,711 (non-refundable extension payment that will be applied to the redemption amount if the remaining balance is paid in full by October 15, 2008)

The payment of the accrued interest of $27,840 for the Highgate House Funds, Ltd. April 26, 2005 debenture reduced the total amount of our indebtedness to YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. to $1,186,253 as agreed to in the May 2008 Forbearance Agreement.

In April 2009, the YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. secured convertible debentures were extended to December 31, 2010. Per the terms of the extension, the security deposit of $171,671 paid in March 2008 and the extension payment of $22,711 paid in May 2008 were applied to the YA Global debenture resulting in a remaining note balance of $233,065. The balance of the Highgate House Funds, Ltd. debenture remained $244,720.

In April 2009, we executed a secured convertible debenture with YA Global for $277,920, maturing on December 31, 2010. The debenture, which is not interest bearing, represents accrued interest owed on the existing YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. secured convertible debentures through April 23, 2009.


In April 2009, YA Global notified us that the April 2005 YA Global and May 2005 Highgate House Funds, Ltd. secured convertible debentures, related documents and the subsequent forbearance agreements had been assigned to Citco Global Custody NV (“Citco Global”) as of April 24, 2009.

In December 2010, the balance of the YA Global April 2009 secured convertible debenture, after conversions, of $231,320, the principal balance due of the YA Global May 2006 promissory note of $100,000 and the accrued interest owed on the promissory note of $32,806.15 was transferred to PMI Technologies, Inc. (“PMI”). The total amount transferred to PMI was $364,126. In connection with the transfer, we paid a related fee to YA Global of $200,000 and recorded as financing expense in December 2010. Therefore, as of December 2010, YA Global is no longer a secured lender to StrikeForce.

In December 2010, we executed an amendment to the PMI transfer agreement whereby the secured convertible balance owed to PMI was distributed among five unrelated parties, one of whom was PMI. The due dates of the notes were extended to December 31, 2012 and the conversion price was modified to a fixed price of $4,437.55 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. Additionally, the amendment called for us to make available to the note holders the opportunity to offer financing to us via the sale of a total of 123 five year warrants exercisable into shares of our common stock at $29,250 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In April 2011, we exercised our right of redemption by retiring the PMI Technologies, Inc. portion of the debenture for a payment of $93,248.48 in April 2011.

In April 2011, we executed an amendment to the PMI transfer agreement whereby we consented to the assignment of the remaining balance due to PMI in the amount of $85,805 to Steeltown and its assignees. Additionally, the conversion price was modified to a fixed price of $741.00 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The amendment also called for us to make available to the note holders the opportunity to offer financing to our company through the sale of a total of 51 three year warrants exercisable into shares of our common stock as a ladder at $19,500, $39,000, $78,000, $117,000, $146,250 each per share for each 10 warrants, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, equally distributed among the warrant holders.

In September 2011, we notified the Steeltown note holders of our intention to redeem the balance due of the debentures in full and, on September 12, 2011, we redeemed the balance due on the debentures of $35,793, thereby eliminating the right for additional conversions.

THE CONTINUOUSLY ADJUSTABLE CONVERSION PRICE FEATURE OF OUR SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES COULD REQUIRE US TO ISSUE A SUBSTANTIALLY GREATER NUMBER OF SHARES, WHICH COULD CAUSE DILUTION TO OUR EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS.

Our obligation to issue a combination of shares or deliver shares through the escrow agent upon conversion of our $542,588 principal amount secured convertible debentures owed to Citco Global is essentially limitless. Citco Global has not processed any conversions through fiscal 2014. The following is an example of the amount of shares of our common stock that are issuable upon conversion of the Citco secured convertible debentures based on various market prices, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split:

Price Per Share  With 20% Discount  Number of Shares  Percentage of Stock Issuable 

$

0.0010

  

$

0.0008

  

678,235,000

 (3)

 

27,643 (1)

$

0.0021

$

0.0010

542,588,000

 (3)

 

 22,115%; 2,078% (1) (2)

 

$

0.0330

  

$

0.0260

  

20,868,769

 (3) 

851 (1)

$

0.0650

  

$

0.0520

  

10,434,385

 (3) 

425 (1)

______________

(1)

Based on 2,453,522 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2014 as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. As illustrated, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our secured convertible debentures will increase if the market price of our stock declines, which will cause dilution to our existing stockholders. The closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2014 was $0.065.

(2)

Based on 26,116,134 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 9, 2015. As illustrated, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our secured convertible debentures will increase if the market price of our stock declines, which will cause dilution to our existing stockholders. The closing price of our common stock on April 9, 2015 was $0.0021.

(3)

As adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split adopted on January 29, 2015.


THE SALES OF COMMON STOCK BY INVESTORS AFTER DELIVERY OF A CONVERSION NOTICE COULD HAVE A DEPRESSIVE EFFECT ON THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK. IN ADDITION, WE DO NOT INTEND TO DISCLOSE THE TIMING OF ANY CONVERSION NOTICES WHICH WE MAY RECEIVE FROM THE INVESTORS, UNTIL WE FILE OUR FORM 10-Q AND FORM 10-K, AND AS A RESULT, YOU WILL HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF WHEN THE INVESTORS ARE CONVERTING INTO SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK UNTIL WE FILE OUR FORM 10-Q AND FORM 10-K.

While the securities purchase agreements with DART/Citco Global contain provisions prohibiting them from engaging in short sales, the investors may, nevertheless, engage in the sale of escrowed shares after delivering a conversion notice to us but before actual delivery of the shares. In the event that DART/Citco Global was to engage in any such sales, this may create downward pressure on the price of our common stock and could result in higher levels of volatility. Further, any resulting decline in the price of our stock could result in increased dilution due to the fact that we could be required to issue greater numbers of shares upon receiving future conversion notices. In addition, not only the sale of shares issued upon conversion of secured debentures, but also the mere perception that these sales could occur, may adversely affect the market price of the common stock. In addition, we do not intend to disclose the timing of conversion notices which we may receive from DART/Citco Global until we file our Form 10-Q and 10-K. As a result, you will have no knowledge of when the investors are converting until we file our Form 10-Q and 10-K. Further, you will not know that the investors have shares of our common stock that they may be imminently selling, or that the investors have sold such shares, all of which may have a depressive effect on the price of our common stock until we file our Form 10-Q and 10-K.

THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK UPON CONVERSION OF THE SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES MAY CAUSE IMMEDIATE AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION TO OUR EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS.

The issuance of shares of our common stock upon conversion of the secured convertible debentures may result in substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders since the selling stockholders may ultimately convert and sell the full amount issuable on conversion. There is no upper limit on the number of shares that may be issued which will have the effect of further diluting the proportionate equity interest and voting power of holders of our common stock.

IF WE ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY REASON TO REPAY OUR OUTSTANDING SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, WE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO DEPLETE OUR WORKING CAPITAL, IF AVAILABLE, OR RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDS. OUR FAILURE TO REPAY THE SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, IF REQUIRED, COULD RESULT IN LEGAL ACTION AGAINST US, WHICH COULD REQUIRE THE SALE OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF OUR ASSETS, CURRENTLY PLEDGED UNDER A UNIFORM COMMERICAL CODE (UCC) FILING IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

Any event of default in our obligations to the holders of the secured convertible debentures such as our failure to repay the principal or interest when due, our failure to issue shares of common stock upon conversion by the holder, our failure to timely file a registration statement or have such registration statement declared effective, breach of any covenant, representation or warranty in the securities purchase agreements for such secured convertible debentures or in the secured convertible debentures, the commencement of a bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or liquidation proceeding against us and the delisting of our common stock could require the early repayment of the secured convertible debentures if the default is not cured with the specified grace period. We anticipate that the full amount of the secured convertible debentures, together with accrued interest, will be converted into shares of our common stock, in accordance with the terms of the secured convertible debentures. If we were required to repay the secured convertible debentures, we would be required to use our limited working capital and raise additional funds. If we were unable to repay the secured debentures when required, the debenture holders could commence legal action against us and foreclose on all of our assets to recover the amounts due. Any such actions would require us to severely limit operations or to file for protection under United States Bankruptcy laws.

OUR SECURITY AGREEMENTS WITH CITCO GLOBAL CUSTODY NV CONTAIN NEGATIVE COVENANTS WHICH RESTRICT OUR ABILITY TO CREATE SECURITY INTERESTS, CHANGE MANAGEMENT, DECLARE DIVIDENDS, MAKE LOANS AND INCUR ADDITIONAL INDEBTEDNESS, WITHOUT CITCO GLOBAL’S AND PMI’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. SUCH RESTRICTIONS COULD IMPEDE OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO FINANCE OUR ONGOING OPERATIONS, WHICH WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

In connection with the securities purchase agreements for our secured convertible debentures with DART/Citco Global, we granted DART/Citco Global a secured interest in all of our assets. In accordance with such agreement, we may not, without DART/Citco Global’s written consent, directly or indirectly:

·

permit to exist any assignment, transfer, pledge, mortgage, security interest or other lien or encumbrance in or against any part of the pledged property;

·

materially change our ownership, executive staff or management, including Mark L. Kay;

·

declare or pay any dividend of any kind, in cash or in property, on any class of our capital stock, or make any distribution of any kind in respect thereof;

·

make any loan, advance or extension of credit to any person other than in the normal course of our business; or to create, incur, or assume any additional indebtedness of any description whatsoever in an aggregate amount in excess of $25,000.


These restrictions could impede our ability to obtain additional funding to finance our ongoing operations, which would have a negative impact on our business and the value of your investment.financing.

 

THE PATENT APPLICATION MOBILETRUST®MOBILETRUSTÒ TECHNOLOGY IS PENDING AND THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT THIS APPLICATIONSAPPLICATION WILL BE GRANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THE PATENT FOR THE APPLICATION COULD PREVENT US FROM SECURING REVENUES IN THE FUTURE. THREE PATENT APPLICATIONS FOR THE PROTECTID®PROTECTIDÒ TECHNOLOGY AND THREE FOR GUARDEDID®GUARDEDIDÒ HAVE BEEN GRANTED. ONE PATENT APPLICATION FOR THE PROTECTID®PROTECTIDÒ TECHNOLOGY IS PENDING.

 

In November 2010, we received notice that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) had issued an official Notice of Allowance for the patent application for the technology relating to our ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ product, titled "Multi-Channel“Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System"System”. In January 2011, we received notice that the USPTO issued to us Patent No. 7,870,599. This “Out-of-Band” Patent went through a USPTO Re-Examination process starting on August 16, 2011 and concluded on December 27, 2011, with all of our patent claims remaining intact and eight additional patent claims being added. Since 2011, we submitted additional continuation patents on the “Out-of-Band” Patent. The keystroke encryption technology we developed and use in our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ product is protected by three patents and one continuation pending.

13
Table of Contents

 

In January 2013, we were assigned the entire right, title and interest in the “Out-of-Band Patent”“Out-of-Band” Patent from NetLabs, with the agreement of the developer, and the assignment was recorded with the USPTO.

 

In February 2013, we executed a retainer agreement with our patent attorneys to aggressively enforce our patent rights as “Out-of-Band Authentication” iswas becoming the standard for authenticating consumers in the financial market.market and for many Saas application users (e.g., SalesForce, Quickbooks, etc.). In February 2013, our patent attorneys submitted a new “Out-of-Band” Patent continuation, which has beenwas granted.

 

In March 2013, our patent attorneys submitted a new “Methods and Apparatus for securing user input in a mobile device” Patent, which is now patent pending. Our MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ product is the invention supporting the patent pending.

 

In July 2013, we received notice that the USPTO had added 54 additional patent claims for our Out-of-Band patent we received in January 2011, by issuing to us Patent No. 8,484,698 thereby strengthening our position with clients and our current and potential lawsuits.

 

In October 2013, we received notice that the USPTO issued to us Patent No. 8,566,608 “Methods and apparatus for securing keystrokes from being intercepted between the keyboard and a browser.” This protects our GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ product and the keystroke encryption portion of our MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ products.

 

In February 2014, we received a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for our third patent relating to our "Multi-Channel“Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System"System” Patent No. 7,870,599. Upon receipt of this Out-of-Band patent we filed another continuation patent.

 

In March 2014, we received Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for our second patent and first continuation of our Keystroke Encryption patent, which only furthers our protection for all mobile devices when utilizing any keyboard for data entry. Upon receipt of this Notice, we also filed another continuation patent for Patent No. 8,566,608.

 

In April 2014, we were granted our third patent relating to our “Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System” Patent No. 8,713,701.

 

In September 2014, we filed an International Patent for MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ (PCT/US20114/029905).

 


In March 2015, we received our third patent from the USPTO, Patent No. 8,973,107, of our Keystroke Encryption patent. This enhances our position for our Keystroke Encryption product, GuardedIDÒ, and our MobileTrustÒ product.

In December 2016, we executed a retainer agreement with a second patent attorney, to aggressively enforce our patent rights as “Out-of-Band Authentication” has become the standard for authenticating consumers in the financial market and for many Saas application users (e.g., SalesForce, Quickbooks, etc.).

 

We completed the development of our ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ platform at the end of June 2006, we completed the core development of our keyboard encryption and anti-keylogger product, GuardedID®GuardedIDÒ, in December 2006 and commenced deployment of our new mobile product, MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ into the mobile stores in 2014, of which the first two2015. All are currently being sold and distributed. Our suite of products is targeted to the financial, e-commerce, corporate, government, healthcare, legal, insurance, technology and retail sectors.markets. We seek to locate customers in a variety of ways. These primarily include contracts with value added resellers and distributors (both inside the United States and internationally), direct sales calls initiated by our internal staff, exhibitions at security and technology trade shows, through the media, through consulting agreements, and through our agent relationships. Our sales generate revenue either as an Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) model, through a Hosting/License agreement, bundled with other company’s products or through direct purchase by distributors and resellers. We price our products for cloud consumer transactions based on the number of transactions in which our software products are utilized. We also price our products for business applications based on the number of users. These pricing models provide our company with one-time, monthly, quarterly and annual recurring revenues with volume discounts. We are also generating revenues from annual maintenance contracts, renewal fees and expect, but cannot guarantee, an increase in revenues based upon the execution of various agreements that we have recently concluded and implemented during the fourth quarter of 2014, primarily in the retail and insurance sectors. To date the MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ patent application has not yet been granted. We cannot be certain that this patent will be granted nor can we be certain that other companies have not filed for patent protection for these technologies. In the event the patents were granted for the MobileTrust®MobileTrustÒ technology, there is no assurance that we will be in a position to enforce the patent rights. Failure to be granted patent protection for the technology could result in greater competition or in limited payments. This could result in inadequate revenue and cause us to cease operations.

14
Table of Contents

 

WE WILL FACE INTENSE COMPETITION FROM COMPETITORS THAT HAVE GREATER FINANCIAL, TECHNICAL AND MARKETING RESOURCES. THESE COMPETITIVE FORCES MAY IMPACT OUR PROJECTED GROWTH AND ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS, WHICH WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

 

We likely will face competition from alternate security software programs and services. As is typical of a new industry, demand and market acceptance for recently introduced services are subject to a high level of uncertainty and risk. In addition, the software industry is characterized by frequent innovation. As the market for computer security products evolves, it will be necessary for us to continually modify and enhance our existing products and develop new products. We believe that our competitors will enhance existing product lines and introduce new products. If we are unable to update our software to compete or to meet announced schedules for improvements and enhancements, it is likely that our sales will suffer and that potential customers will be lost to a competing company’s product.

 

Because the market for our services is new and evolving, it is difficult to predict the future growth rate, if any, and the size of this market. Substantial marketing activities have been implemented and will continue to be required to meet our revenue and profit goals. There can be no assurance we will be successful in such marketing efforts. There can be no assurance either that the market for our services will develop or become sustainable. Further, other companies may decide to provide services similar to ours. These companies may be better capitalized than us and we could face significant competition in pricing and services offered.

 

IF WE DO NOT ADEQUATELY PROTECT THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, WE MAY EXPERIENCE A LOSS OF REVENUE AND OUR OPERATIONS MAY BE MATERIALLY IMPAIRED.

 

We rely upon confidentiality agreements signed by our employees, consultants and third parties to protect the intellectual property. These agreements generally provide that the individual must keep confidential and not disclose to other parties any confidential information developed or learned by the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us except in limited circumstances. These agreements generally also provide that we shall own all inventions conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to us. These agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information or result in the effective assignment to us of intellectual property, and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information or other breaches of the agreements. In addition, others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information that have been licensed to us or that we own, and in such case we could not assert any trade secret rights against such party.

 

We cannot assure that we can adequately protect the intellectual property or successfully prosecute potential infringement of the intellectual property rights. Also, we cannot assure that others will not assert rights in, or ownership of, trademarks and other proprietary rights of ours or that we will be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to our satisfaction. Failure to protect the intellectual property rights would result in a loss of revenue and could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. In December 2011, we executed an exclusive agreement with a firm to defend and protect our “Out-of-Band” Patent No. 7,870,599, which now includes Patent No. 8,484,698 and 8,713,701. In January 2013, we were assigned the entire right, title and interest in the “Out-of-Band” patent by NetLabs, with approval by the developer, and the assignment was recorded with the USPTO. We are working with our patent attorneys to aggressively enforce our Out-of-Band Authentication patent rights per the terms of a retainer agreementagreements executed in February 2013.2013 and December 2016, respectively, with two firms.


 

OUR INABILITY TO RETAIN OUR KEY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WOULD IMPEDE OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND GROWTH STRATEGIES, WHICH COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

 

Our success depends, to a critical extent, on the continued efforts and services of our Chief Executive Officer, Mark L. Kay, our Chief Technical Officer and Inventor, Ramarao Pemmaraju, and our Executive Vice President and Head of Marketing, George Waller. Were we to lose two or more of these key executive officers, we would be forced to expend significant time and money in the pursuit of a replacement, which would result in both a delay in the implementation of our business plan and the diversion of limited working capital. We can give you no assurance that we can find satisfactory replacements for these key executive officers at all, or on terms that are not unduly expensive or burdensome to our Company. We do not currently carry key-man life insurance policies on any of our employees, which would assist us in recouping our costs in the event of the loss of those officers.

 

15
Table of Contents

THE INABILITY TO MANAGE OUR GROWTH COULD IMPEDE OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS AND TO OTHERWISE IMPLEMENT OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND GROWTH STRATEGIES, WHICH WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

 

We plan to grow rapidly, which will place strains on our management team and other Company resources to both implement more sophisticated managerial, operational and financial systems, procedures and controls and to hire, train and manage the personnel necessary to implement those functions. Our staff is currently comprised of sixseven people and we believe that in order for us to achieve our goals, it will be necessary to further expand our personnel, particularly in the area of sales, support services, technology development and client support. As we grow, we also expect to increase detailed and pertinent internal and administrative controls and procedures, require further product enhancements and customization of our existing products for specific clients, as well as enter new geographic markets. We do not presently have in place the corporate infrastructure common to larger organizations. We do not, for example, have a separate human resources department or purchasing department designed for a larger organization. Some of our key personnel do not have experience managing large numbers of personnel. Substantial expansion of our organization will require the acquisition of additional information systems and equipment, a larger physical space and formal management of human resources. It will require that we expand the number of people within our organization providing additional administrative support (or consider outsourcing) and to develop and implement additional internal controls appropriate for a larger organization. Our experience to date in managing the minimal growth of our Company has been positive, without product failures or breakdowns of internal controls. 

 

The time and costs to effectuate our business development process may place a significant strain on our management personnel, systems and resources, particularly given the limited amount of financial resources and skilled employees that may be available at the time. There can be no assurance that we will integrate and manage successfully new systems, controls and procedures for our business, or that our systems, controls, procedures, facilities and personnel, even if successfully integrated, will be adequate to support our projected future operations. There can be no assurance that any expenditure incurred during this expansion will ever be recouped. Any failure to implement and maintain such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

AS A PUBLIC COMPANY WE ARE SUBJECT TO COMPLEX LEGAL AND ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS THAT WILL REQUIRE US TO INCUR SIGNIFICANT EXPENSES AND WILL EXPOSE US TO RISK OF NON-COMPLIANCE.

As a public company, we are subject to numerous legal and accounting requirements that do not apply to private companies. The cost of compliance with many of these requirements is material, not only in absolute terms but, more importantly, in relation to the overall scope of the operations of a small company. Failure to comply with these requirements can have numerous adverse consequences including, but not limited to, our inability to file required periodic reports on a timely basis, loss of market confidence, delisting of our securities and/or governmental or private actions against us. We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with all of these requirements or that the cost of such compliance will not prove to be a substantial competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis privately held and larger public competitors.


THE REGULATION OF PENNY STOCKS BY SEC AND FINRA (FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.) MAY DISCOURAGE THE TRADABILITY OF OUR SECURITIES AND THEREBY MAKE IT HARD FOR INVESTORS TO SELL THEIR SHARES AT THE TIME AND PRICES THEY MIGHT OTHERWISE EXPECT.

 

We are a "penny stock"“penny stock” company. We are subject to a Securities and Exchange Commission rule that imposes special sales practice requirements upon broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers or accredited investors. For purposes of the rule, the phrase "accredited investors"“accredited investors” means, in general terms, institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000, or individuals having a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or having an annual income that exceeds $200,000 (or that, when combined with a spouse's income, exceeds $300,000). For transactions covered by the rule, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination of the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Effectively, this discourages broker-dealers from executing trades in penny stocks. Consequently, the rule will affect the ability of purchasers in this offering to sell their securities in any market that might develop, because it imposes additional regulatory burdens on penny stock transactions.

 

In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted a number of rules to regulate "penny stocks"“penny stocks”. Such rules include Rules 3a51-1, 15g-1, 15g-2, 15g-3, 15g-4, 15g-5, 15g-6, and 15g-9 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because our securities constitute "penny stocks"“penny stocks” within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply to us and to our securities. The rules will further affect the ability of owners of shares to sell their securities in a market that might develop for them because it imposes additional regulatory burdens on penny stock transactions.

 

Shareholders should be aware that, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (i) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (ii) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (iii) "boiler room"“boiler room” practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (iv) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (v) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, leaving investors with losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities.

 

16
Table of Contents

RULE 144 SALES IN THE FUTURE MAY HAVE A DEPRESSIVE EFFECT ON OUR STOCK PRICE AS AN INCREASE IN SUPPLY OF SHARES FOR SALE, WITH NO CORRESPONDING INCREASE IN DEMAND WILL CAUSE PRICES TO FALL.

 

All of the outstanding shares of common stock held by the present officers, directors, and affiliate stockholders are "restricted securities"“restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As restricted shares, these shares may be resold only pursuant to an effective registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable exemptions from registration under the Act and as required under applicable state securities laws. Rule 144 provides in essence that a person who is an affiliate or officer or director who has held restricted securities for six months may, under certain conditions, sell every three months, in brokerage transactions, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of 1.0% of a company's outstanding common stock. There is no limit on the amount of restricted securities that may be sold by a non-affiliate after the owner has held the restricted securities for a period of six months if the company is a current reporting company under the 1934 Act. A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the Act, if available, or pursuant to subsequent registration of shares of common stock of present stockholders, may have a depressive effect upon the price of the common stock in any market that may develop.

 

FINRA SALES PRACTICE REQUIREMENTS MAY ALSO LIMIT A STOCKHOLDER'S ABILITY TO BUY AND SELL OUR STOCK.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

 


BECAUSE WE ARE QUOTED ON THE OTCMarkets.comOTCMARKETS.COM PINK SHEETS INSTEAD OF AN EXCHANGE OR NATIONAL QUOTATION SYSTEM, OUR INVESTORS MAY HAVE A MORE DIFFICULT TIME SELLING THEIR STOCK OR EXPERIENCE NEGATIVE VOLATILITY ON THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK.

 

Our common stock is traded on the OTCMarkets.com Pink Sheets. The OTCMarkets.com Pink Sheets is often highly illiquid. There is a greater chance of volatility for securities that trade on the OTCMarkets.com Pink Sheets as compared to a national exchange or quotation system. This volatility may be caused by a variety of factors, including the lack of readily available price quotations, the absence of consistent administrative supervision of bid and ask quotations, lower trading volume, and market conditions. Investors in our common stock may experience high fluctuations in the market price and volume of the trading market for our securities. These fluctuations, when they occur, have a negative effect on the market price for our securities. - Accordingly, for the reasons above, our stockholders may not be able to realize a fair price from their shares when they determine to sell them or may have to hold them for a substantial period of time until the market for our common stock improves.

 

FAILURE TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS.

 

It may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and implement the additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal auditing and other finance staff in order to develop and implement appropriate additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures.

 

If we fail to comply in a timely manner with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal control over financial reporting or to remedy any material weaknesses in our internal controls that we may identify, such failure could result in material misstatements in our financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

17
Table of Contents

  

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and current SEC regulations, we are required to prepare assessments regarding internal controls over financial reporting and, furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. We have begun the process of documenting and testing our internal control procedures in order to satisfy these requirements, which is likely to result in increased general and administrative expenses and may shift management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. While our management is expending significant resources in an effort to complete this important project, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our objective on a timely basis. Failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment or complete our Section 404 certifications could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

 

In addition, in connection with our on-going assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may discover “material weaknesses” in our internal controls as defined in standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The PCAOB defines “significant deficiency” as a deficiency that results in more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.

 

In the event that a material weakness is identified, we will employ qualified personnel and adopt and implement policies and procedures to address any material weaknesses that we identify. However, the process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company. We cannot assure you that the measures we will take will remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial process and reporting in the future.

 

Any failure to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations of our internal controls and, in the case of a failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, would adversely affect the annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Inadequate internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

 


WE DO NOT INTEND TO PAY DIVIDENDS. 

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We may not have sufficient funds to legally pay dividends. Even if funds are legally available to pay dividends, we may nevertheless decide in our sole discretion not to pay dividends. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of the board of directors, and will depend upon, among other things, the results of our operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors our board of directors may consider relevant. There is no assurance that we will pay any dividends in the future, and, if dividends are rapid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend.

VOLATILITY IN OUR COMMON SHARE PRICE MAY SUBJECT US TO SECURITIES LITIGATION, THEREBY DIVERTING OUR RESOURCES THAT MAY HAVE A MATERIAL EFFECT ON OUR PROFITABILITY AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

 

As discussed in the preceding risk factors, the market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert management’s attention and resources.

 

IF WE ARE UNABLE TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN, INVESTORS MAY FACE A COMPLETE LOSS OF THEIR INVESTMENT.

The independent auditor’s report on our financial statements contains explanatory language that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern. The report states that we depend on the continued contributions of our executive officers to work effectively as a team, to execute our business strategy and to manage our business. The loss of key personnel, or their failure to work effectively, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. If we are unable to obtain sufficient financing in the near term or achieve profitability, then we would, in all likelihood, experience severe liquidity problems and may have to curtail our operations. If we curtail our operations, we may be placed into bankruptcy or undergo liquidation, the result of which will adversely affect the value of our common shares.

COMPLIANCE WITH CHANGING REGULATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL EXPENSES AND POSE CHALLENGES FOR OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM.

 

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC regulations, have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated with accessing the U.S. public markets. In addition, the current federal administration has indicated significant regulatory modifications and we cannot foresee the impact of any revised regulations. Our management team will need to devote significant time and financial resources to comply with both existing and evolving standards for public companies, including the policies of the recently appointed Chairman of the SEC, which will lead to increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue generating activities to compliance activities.

 

SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, EXPECTED, INTENDED OR PLANNED.

 

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statementa:Statements

18
Table of Contents

 

This annual report contains forward-looking statements about our business, financial condition and prospects that reflect our management’s assumptions and good faith beliefs based on information currently available. We can give no assurance that the expectations indicated by such forward-looking statements will be realized. If any of our assumptions should prove incorrect, or if any of the risks and uncertainties underlying such expectations should materialize, our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements.


 

The key factors that are not within our control and that may have a direct bearing on operating results include, but are not limited to, acceptance of our proposed services and the products we expect to market, our ability to establish a customer base, managements’ ability to raise capital in the future, the retention of key employees and changes in the regulation of our industry.

 

There may be other risks and circumstances that management may be unable to predict. When used in this filing, words such as, “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify and qualify forward-looking statements, although there may be certain forward-looking statements not accompanied by such expressions.

 

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

This Item is not applicable to us as we are not an accelerated filer, a large accelerated filer, or a well-seasoned issuer; however, we have not received written comments from the Commission staff regarding our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within the last 180 days before the end of our last fiscal year.

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

We operate from leased offices located at 1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite #603, Edison, New Jersey 08837. We do not hold any material investments in other real or personal property other than office equipment. We anticipate these facilities will be adequate for the immediate future but that if we are successful in introducing our products, we will need to seek larger or additional office quarters. We paypaid a monthly base rent of $3,807 which commenced on July 1, 2009, with an initial extended lease termination date of January 31, 2016. In November 2015, the lease was extended for three years to January 31, 2019. We paid a monthly base rent of $4,067 from February 2016 thru January 2017, and will pay monthly base rents of $4,190 from February 2017 through January 2018 and $4,316 from February 2018 thru January 2019. The landlord holds $8,684 as our security deposit. The lease requires us to pay costs such as maintenance and insurance.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On March 25, 2013 we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (case no: 13-cv-01895 (SRC)(CLW)) vs. WhiteSky, Inc (an existing channel partner). We filed claims that WhiteSky effectuated multiple contract breaches, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of Intellectual Property, and disclosure of confidential information in commencing attempts to replace our “GuardedID® Customized Desktop Product” with a third party's product since November 2012, even though the contractual agreement did not expire until May 2014. In July 2013, we filed an amended complaint based on the Court’s rulings on the motions, which required some minor adjustments and strengthening based on what we learned through early admissible discovery. In early 2014 settlement discussions commenced and the lawsuit was settled on March 9, 2015 with mutually agreed upon terms.

 

On March 28, 2013, we initiated patent litigation against PhoneFactor, Inc., a subsidiary of Microsoft Inc., Fiserv, Inc., and First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in Wilmington, for Infringement of United States Patent No. 7,870,599 (the ’599 Patent). Currently Fiserv, Inc. is released from this complaint and we have amended this complaint, in April 2014, to include our two additional Out-of-Band patents (Patent Nos.: 8,484,698 & 8,713,701).an outside party. As of DecemberMarch 31, 20142015, the case was in full discovery. As of March 2015,discovery, the Markmanpre-trial hearing was held, and the deliberations are continuing with various discussions ongoing.were continuing. Mediation took place in May 2015 to discuss a potential settlement, and on January 15, 2016, the parties reached a settlement in the matter. As part of the settlement, the Company received a payment in January 2016 of $9,750,000 and incurred fees related to the settlement of $4,187,257.

 

On May 22, 2013June 20, 2016, we filed a Complaintinitiated additional patent litigation against three major competitors in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, seeking a declaratory judgment that (1) we do not infringe upon a patent for customer authentication technology owned by Authentifyinfringement of United States Patent Co., LLC (“Authentify”), and (2) the Authentify patent is invalid under the Patent Act. Our actionNo. 8,484,698. This litigation was filed in response toby our patent attorneys, Blank Rome LLP, and is ongoing. On March 14, 2017, one of the parties initiated an April 26, 2013 filing by Authentify of a patent infringement actionIPR against us in Federal district court in Seattle, Washington, claiming that we have infringed upon Authentify’s patent, U.S.our second Patent No. 6,934,858. As8,484,698.

On March 14, 2017, we initiated additional patent litigation against two major competitors in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701. This litigation was filed by our patent attorneys, Ropes and Gray LLP, and is ongoing.

On March 2015,14, 2017, we initiated additional patent litigation against two major competitors in the New Jersey complaint has been droppedU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and the Washington complaint8,713,701. This litigation was settled. Per the terms of the settlement, both parties have agreed to execute waivers that guarantee no further legal action against each other relating to this matter.filed by our patent attorneys, Ropes and Gray LLP, and is ongoing.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURESDISCLOSURES.

 

Not applicable.


19
 

Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

 

(A) MARKET INFORMATION

 

Our Small Business registration statement on Form SB-2 was declared effective by the SEC in August 2005 and our shares were approved for listing on the OTC Bulletin Board by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA(FINRA) in December 2005. Prior to December 2005, there was no public market for the common stock. Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board maintained by OTCMarkets.com under the symbol “SFOR.PK”. It has been traded in the over-the-counter market on a limited basis. The following sets forth high and low bid price quotations for each calendar quarter during the last fiscal years that trading occurred or quotations were available, as adjusted bycalculated based on the result post-prior reverse splits of our 1:650 reverse stock split.common stock. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

 

Quarter Ended:

 Low:  High: 

March 31, 2013

 

$

5,850.00

  

$

9,652.50

 

June 30, 2013

 

$

1,170.00

  

$

1,657.50

 

September 30, 2013

 

$

682.50

  

$

975.00

 

December 31, 2013

 

$

97.50

  

$

195.00

 

March 31, 2014

 

$

91.00

  

$

117.00

 

June 30, 2014

 

$

21.45

  

$

35.75

 

September 30, 2014

 

$

1.69

  

$

2.21

 

December 31, 2014

 

$

0.0065

  

$

1.30

 

Quarter Ended:

 

Low:

 

 

High:

 

March 31, 2015

 

$0.0025

 

 

$70.00

 

June 30, 2015

 

$0.0001

 

 

$4.50

 

September 30, 2015

 

$0.008

 

 

$0.07

 

December 31, 2015

 

$0.0005

 

 

$0.0084

 

March 31, 2016

 

$0.0002

 

 

$0.0059

 

June 30, 2016

 

$0.0008

 

 

$0.0032

 

September 30, 2016

 

$0.001

 

 

$0.0205

 

December 31, 2016

 

$0.0037

 

 

$0.0184

 

 

The closing bid price for our shares of common stock on April 9, 20157, 2017 was $0.0021.$0.0247.

 

Our common stock is considered a low pricedlow-priced security under the “Penny Stock” rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, broker-dealers participating in transactions in these securities must first deliver a risk disclosure document which describes risks associated with these stocks, broker-dealers’ duties, customers’ rights and remedies, market and other information, and make suitability determinations approving the customers for these stock transactions based on financial situation, investment experience and objectives. Broker-dealers must also disclose these restrictions in writing, provide monthly account statements to customers, and obtain specific written consent of each customer. With these restrictions, the likely effect of designation as a low pricedlow-priced stock is to decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to make a market for the stock, to decrease the liquidity of the stock and increase the transaction cost of sales and purchases of these stocks compared to other securities.

 

(B) HOLDERS

 

As of April 9, 2015,7, 2017, there were approximately 454458 holders of the common stock on record with our transfer agent (several holders of record are brokerage firms often through CEDE & Co., which handle accounts for individual investors).agent.

 

(C) DIVIDENDS

 

We have not previously paid any cash dividends on common stock and do not anticipate or contemplate paying dividends on common stock in the foreseeable future. Our present intention is to utilize all available funds to develop and expand our business. The only restrictions that limit the ability to pay dividends on common equity, or that are likely to do so in the future, are those restrictions imposed by law and those restrictions imposed under contractual obligation. Under Wyoming corporate law, no dividends or other distributions may be made which would render a company insolvent or reduce assets to less than the sum of liabilities plus the amount needed to satisfy outstanding liquidation preferences.

 

Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors, and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors as our board may deem relevant at that time.

 


(D) RECENT ISSUANCES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

 

In October 2014, we issued 98,867 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $30,000 of a convertible note, and $2,114 of accrued interest, dated March 24, 2014, and $5,000 of a convertible back-end note, that tacks back to March 24, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.2639 per share to $0.7917 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In October 2014, we issued 49,528 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $22,845 of a convertible note, and $2,120 of accrued interest, dated March 11, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.286 per share to $1.04 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In October 2014, we issued 85,539 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $32,112 of a convertible note, dated March 26, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.273 per share to $5.85 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In October 2014, we issued 16,064 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $4,490 of a convertible note, dated April 8, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.2795 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In October 2014, we issued 40,229 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $10,000 of a convertible note, and $616 of accrued interest, dated March 14, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.2639 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In October 2014, we issued 51,366 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $18,990 of a convertible note, and $91 of accrued interest, originally issued to a non-related third party on September 23, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company on October 1, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.2639 per share to $0.7917 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In October 2014, we issued 80,001 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $24,720 of a convertible note, dated April 1, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.273 per share to $0.585 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In October 2014, we issued 37,303 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $14,151 of a convertible note, originally issued to a non-related third party on January 23, 2009, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company on April 23, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.2639 per share to $0.5655 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In October 2014, the Company, in connection with a convertible promissory note executed April 29, 2014 with an unrelated party in the amount of $26,250 that bears interest at 12% per annum with principal due April 29, 2015, issued common stock purchase warrants exercisable in the aggregate into 611 shares of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to the unrelated party at an exercise price of $21.49 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The common stock purchase warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from issuance. The original common stock purchase warrant share issuance was 45 warrant shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, and was increased to 611 warrant shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at December 31, 2014, per the terms of the reset feature in the warrant agreement.

In October 2014, the Company executed a convertible promissory note with an unrelated party in the amount of $26,250. The note bears interest at 12% per annum with principal due October 17, 2015. In connection with the convertible promissory note, the Company issued common stock purchase warrants exercisable in the aggregate into 45 shares of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to the unrelated party, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The common stock purchase warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from issuance. The original common stock purchase warrant share issuance was 45 warrant shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, and was increased to 28,320 warrant shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at December 31, 2014, per the terms of the reset feature in the warrant agreement.

In October 2014, we issued 37,566 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that exercised 61 warrant shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, of a common stock purchase warrant agreement, dated October 18, 2013, into shares of our common stock. The exercise price was $1.05 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.


In November 2014, we issued 189,529 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $14,865 of a March 24, 2014 convertible back-end note into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.0075 per share to $0.1131 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In November 2014, we issued 61,282 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $1,259 of a convertible note dated May 21, 2014, and $1,131 of accrued interest, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.039 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In November 2014, we issued 135,538 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $9,702 of a convertible note, dated March 26, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.039 per share to $0.117 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In November 2014, we issued 93,755 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $11,175 of a convertible note, dated April 8, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.078 per share to $0.2145 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In November 2014, we issued 84,960 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $3,000 of a convertible note dated March 14, 2014, and $203 of accrued interest, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In November 2014, we issued 62,570 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $7,000 of a convertible note, and $77 of accrued interest, originally issued to a non-related third party on September 23, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company on October 1, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.1131 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In November 2014, we issued 158,461 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $12,500 of a convertible note, dated April 1, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.065 per share to $0.0975 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In November 2014, we issued 19,034 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $1,435 of a convertible note, originally issued to a non-related third party on January 23, 2009, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company on April 23, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.0754 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In November 2014, we issued 122,432 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that exercised 39 common stock purchase warrant shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, of a common stock purchase warrant agreement, dated October 18, 2013, into shares of our common stock. The exercise prices ranged from $0.03 per share to $1.05 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In December 2014, we issued 97,980 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $3,450 of a convertible note dated March 14, 2014, and $244 of accrued interest, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In December 2014, we issued 104,615 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $3,944 of a convertible note dated March 24, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In December 2014, we issued 79,487 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $3,054 of a convertible note, and $46 of accrued interest, dated May 21, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.039 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In December 2014, we issued 93,692 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $3,654 of a convertible note, dated March 26, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.039 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In December 2014, we issued 92,142 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $3,474 of a convertible note, dated May 25, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.


In December 2014, we issued 113,617 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that converted $8,400 of a convertible note, and $167 of accrued interest, originally issued to a non-related third party on September 23, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company on October 1, 2014, into shares of our common stock. The conversion price was $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In December 2014, per the terms of the reset feature in a common stock purchase warrant agreement issued to an unrelated party in October 2013,we increased the number of warrant shares issued from 94 shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to 1,173 shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The common stock purchase warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from issuance. After warrant exercise notices processed as of December 31, 2014, there are 1,063 warrant shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, outstanding in relation to the warrant agreement.

In December 2014, we issued 163,305 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to an investor firm that exercised 10 warrant shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, of a common stock purchase warrant agreement, dated October 18, 2013, into shares of our common stock. The exercise price was $0.03 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

In December 2014,2016, we issued a total of 127,500 shares of restricted common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, valued at $0.75,$121, relating to a December 2009 retainer agreement with an attorney.

20
Table of Contents

In December 2016, an investor purchased 1,000,000 common stock purchase options for $500, for shares equaling 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. The payment was received in January 2017.

 

All of the above offerings and sales, except the afore-mentioned shares issued pursuant to a conversion of convertible notes, were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, based on the following: (a) the investors confirmed to us that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and had such background, education and experience in financial and business matters as to be able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the securities; (b) there was no public offering or general solicitation with respect to the offering; (c) the investors were provided with certain disclosure materials and all other information requested with respect to our company; (d) where applicable, the investors acknowledged that all securities being purchased were “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, and agreed to transfer such securities only in a transaction registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or exempt from registration under the Securities Act; and (e) where applicable, a legend was placed on the certificates representing each such security stating that it was restricted and could only be transferred if subsequent registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or1933or transferred in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

None.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

 

The followingAs a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide the information has been summarized from financial information included elsewhere and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and notes thereto.required by this Item. 


Summary of Statements of Operations of StrikeForce

Statement of Operations Data:

  For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
  2014  2013 
     
Revenues $324,807  $434,657 
Cost of Sales (9,658) (16,967)
Operating and Other Expenses (3,665,379) (2,828,616)
        
Net Loss $(3,350,230) $(2,410,926)
        
Balance Sheet Data:        
 December 31, 
 2014  2013 
        
Current Assets $70,424  $78,300 
Total Assets  104,095   115,492 
Current Liabilities  12,205,751   11,059,393 
Non Current Liabilities  97,404   70,001 
Total Liabilities  12,303,155   11,129,394 
Working Capital (Deficit) (12,135,327) (10,981,093)
Shareholders'Equity (Deficit) $(12,199,060) $(11,013,902)

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

The following is management’s discussion and analysis (|MD&A”) of certain significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements, as well as information relating to the plans of our current management. This report includes forward-looking statements. Generally, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “continue,” and similar expressions or the negative thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including the matters set forth in this report or other reports or documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those projected. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto and other financial information contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K.


10-K

Our MD&A is comprised of significant accounting estimates made in the normal course of its operations, overview of our business conditions, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources and contractual obligations. We did not have any off balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 20132015 or 2014.2016.

 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon its financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (or "GAAP"“GAAP”). The preparation of those financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of its financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

21
Table of Contents

Background

 

We are a software development and services company that offers a suite of integrated computer network security products (patented and patent pending) using proprietary technology.

 

We generated all of our revenues of $324,807$384,289 for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, compared to $434,657$271,559 for the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, from the sales of our security software products.

 

We have incurred substantial losses since our inception. Our management believes that our products provide a cost-effective and technologically competitive solution to address the problems of network security and identity theft in general. Updated guidance for the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council(“FFIEC”) regulations include the requirement for solutions that have Two-Factor Out-of-Band Authentication and products that stop keylogging malware, real time, which our management believes our proprietary products uniquely and directly address. This new updated guidance went into effect as of January 1, 2012. Based on this new requirement in the latest FFIEC update that was published in June 2011 with enforcement commencing in January 2012, we have recently experienced a growing increase in sales orders and inquiries. However, there can be no assurance that our products will continue to gain acceptance and continue to grow in the commercial marketplace or that one of our competitors will not introduce technically superior products. 

 

Because we are now experiencing a continual growing market demand, we arebelieve our company is developing a sizeable global reseller and distribution channel as a strategy to generate, manage and fulfill demand for our products across market segments, minimizing the requirement for an increase in our staff. We have minimized the concentration on our initial direct sales efforts as our distribution and reseller channels continue to grow internationally and require appropriate levels of support.

 

On March 18, 2014, we effected a 1:1,500 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. On February 13, 2015, we effected a 1:650 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. On August 4, 2015, we effected a 1:1,000 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the reverse stock splits adopted by us as if the reverse had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

Results of Operations

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20142016 COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20132015

 

Revenues for the year ended December 31, 20142016 were $324,807$384,289 compared to $434,657$271,559 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease2015, an increase of $109,850$112,730 or 25.2%41.5%. The decreaseincrease in revenues was primarily due to the decreaseincrease in the sales of our GuardedID® keyboard encryption (anti-keylogger) technology relating to our initiated litigation with one of our channel partners, WhiteSky, Inc. ("WhiteSky"), as well as delays in realizing revenues from some of our new distributor’s clients,software, services, maintenance and in delayed rollout of our new mobile security technologies. We have opportunities, through our sales channels, including current pilots, that we expect, but cannot guarantee will increase revenues in fiscal 2015. We anticipate revenues will increase during the second half 2015 as we rollout MobileTrust®, and GuardedID® Mac enterprise edition by mid-2015. The lawsuit with WhiteSky was settled on March 9, 2015 with mutually agreed upon terms.support sales.

 

Revenues generated consisted of hardware and software sales and license, services, support and maintenance sales, revenue from sign on fees, and recurring transaction revenues. Hardware sales for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $6,431 compared to $8,624 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $2,193. The decrease in hardware revenues was primarily due to the decrease in our sales of our one-time-password token key-fobs.fees. Software, services, support and maintenance sales for the year ended December 31, 20142016 were $318,376$381,009 compared to $426,033$267,205 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease2015, an increase of $107,657.$113,804. The decreaseincrease in software, services, support and maintenance revenues was primarily due to the decreaseincrease in the sales and support of our GuardedID® keyboard encryption (anti-keylogger) technology relatingsoftware and mobile products. Hardware sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $3,280 compared to $4,354 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $1,074. The decrease in hardware revenues was due to the decrease in sales of our initiated litigation with WhiteSky, which was settled on March 9, 2015 with mutually agreed upon terms.one-time-password token key-fobs.

 

Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 20142016 was $9,658$6,363 compared to $16,967$8,441 for the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, a decrease of $7,309,$2,078, or 43.0%24.6%. The decrease resulted primarily from the decrease in processing fees relating to our ProtectID® product and due to the decrease in our sales of our one-time-password token key-fobs. Cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 20142016 was 2.9%1.2% compared to 3.9%3.1% for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease resulted primarily from the decrease in our cost of revenues.2015. 


 

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 20142016 was $315,149$377,926 compared to $417,690$263,118 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease2015, an increase of $102,541,$114,808, or 24.5%43.7%. The decreaseincrease in gross profit was primarily due to the decreaseincrease in the sales of our GuardedID® keyboard encryption (anti-keylogger) technology relating to our initiated litigation with WhiteSky, which was settled on March 9, 2015 with mutually agreed upon terms.software, services, maintenance and support sales.

  

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 20142016 were $287,646$521,663 compared to $340,600$262,973 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease2015, an increase of $52,954,$258,690, or 15.5%98.4%. The decreaseincrease in research and development expenses was primarily due to the eliminationaddition of one staff member through attrition.(we increased our technology staff by hiring a software engineer in January 2016), an overall increase in our salaries, and the testing of our mobile products, which required the purchase of peripherals for testing purposes. The salaries, benefits and overhead costs of personnel conducting research and development of our software products primarily comprise research and development expenses.

 

Selling,
22
Table of Contents

Compensation, professional fees, and selling, general and administrative (“SGA”(collectively, “SGA”) expenses for the year ended December 31, 20142016 were $1,294,882$2,298,883 compared to $1,310,594$1,111,679 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease2015, an increase of $15,712$1,187,204 or 1.1%107%. The decreaseincrease was due primarily to the decreaseincrease in salaries and related payroll taxes resulting from salary increases implemented in January 2016, an increase in professional fees, we expensedexpenses relating to options granted to employees in 2014. Selling, generalSeptember 2016 and administrativean increase in warrant expense. SG&A expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and overhead costs for executive and administrative personnel, insurance, fees for professional services, including consulting, legal, and accounting fees, plus travel costs and non-cash stock compensation expense for the issuance of stock options to employees and non-employees and other general corporate expenses.

 

Other expenseincome (expense) for the year ended December 31, 20142016 was $2,082,851income of $5,381,185 as compared to $1,177,422expenses of ($695,711) for the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, representing an increase in other expenseincome of $905,429,$6,076,896, or 76.8%874%. The increase was primarily due to an increasethe net settlement of patent remediation litigation, which was settled in changes in fair valueJanuary 2016 and the extinguishment of derivative liabilities and an increase inderivatives relating to the payoff of convertible debt, offset by interest expense.

 

Our net lossincome (loss) for the year ended December 31, 20142016 was $3,350,230$2,938,565 compared to a net loss of $2,410,926($1,807,245) for the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, an increase in net income of $939,304,$4,745,810, or 38.9%263%. The increase in our net loss was primarily due primarily to the decreasenet settlement of patent remediation litigation, which was settled in our total revenuesJanuary 2016 and the increase in other expenses causedextinguishment of derivatives relating to the payoff of convertible debt, offset by increases in the change in fair value of derivative liabilitiesSGA expenses and in interest expense.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our total current assets at December 31, 20142016 were $70,424,$965,404, which included cash of $13,129,$804,130, as compared with $78,300$60,409 in total current assets at December 31, 2013,2015, which included cash of $7,559.$37,153. Additionally, we had astockholders’ deficit in the amount of $12,199,060$8,439,490 at December 31, 20142016 compared to a stockholders’ deficit of $11,013,902$13,724,487 at December 31, 2013.2015. We have historically incurred recurring losses and have financed our operations through loans, principally from affiliated parties such as our directors, and from the proceeds of debt and equity financing. The liabilities include a computed liability for the fair value of derivatives of $1,415,402, which will only be realized on the conversion of the derivatives, or settlement of the debentures.

 

We financed our operations during the year ended December 31, 20142016 primarily through the issuancenet settlement of debtpatent remediation litigation which was settled in the aggregate amount of $951,500, through recurring revenues from our ProtectID® and GuardedID® technologies in the aggregate amount of $313,288, and through the sales of our shares of Series B Preferred Stock in the aggregate amount of $213,000. Management anticipates that we will continue to rely on equity and debt financing, at least for 2015 and early 2016, to finance our operations.January 2016. While management believes that there will be a substantial percentage of our sales generated from our GuardedID®patented GuardedIDÒ and new mobile products and there are an increasing number of customers for our patented ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ product, we will continue to have customer concentrations. Inherently, as time progresses and corporate exposure in the market continues to grow, with increasing marketing efforts, management believes, but cannot guarantee, we will continue to attain greater numbers of customers and the concentrations could decrease over time and we project, but cannot guarantee, to be cash flow positive by the end of 2015. Until this is accomplished, management will continue to attempt to secure additional financing through both the public and private market sectors to meet our continuing commitments of expenditures and until our sales revenue can provide greater liquidity.

Our number of common shares outstanding increased from 3,566 shares at the year ended December 31, 2013 to 2,453,522 at the year ended December 31, 2014, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, an increase of 68,703%. The increase in the number of common shares outstanding was due to common shares issued related to the issuance, conversion and settlement of debt, the exercise of warrant agreements, or equity financing and consulting obligations, which, consequently, helped to reduce our outstanding debentures.

Our number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding increased from 0 shares at the year ended December 31, 2013 to 142,004 at the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding was due to the sale of shares of Series B Preferred Stock, through subscription agreements, related to equity financing.


We have historically incurred losses and we anticipate, but cannot guarantee, that we will not generate any significant revenues until mid-2015. Our operations presently require funding of approximately $110,000 per month. Management believes, but cannot provide assurances, that we will be cash flow positive by the end of 2015, based on recently executed and announced contracts and potential contracts that we anticipate closing throughout 2015 in the financial industry, technology, insurance, enterprise, healthcare, government, legal, and consumer sectors in the United States, Latin America, Europe, Africa and the Pacific Rim. There can be no assurance, however, that the sales anticipated will materialize or that we will achieve the profitability we have forecasted. Management also recognizes the consequences of the current world economic developments and the possible volatile effect on currency rates resulting from revenues derived from foreign markets.

Changes in Authorized Shares

In February 2014, a 1:1,500 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in March 2014.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the 1:1,500 reverse stock split adopted in March 2014 and subsequent reverse stock splits.

In February 2014, a decrease of the authorized shares of our common stock from six billion seven hundred fifty million (6,750,000,000) to one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in March 2014.

In December 2014, an increase of the authorized shares of our common stock from one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000) to nine billion (9,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in December 2014.

In December 2014, a 1:650 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in January 2015.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the 1:650 reverse stock split adopted in January 2015.

In December 2014, a decrease of the authorized shares of our common stock from nine billion (9,000,000,000) to three billion (3,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in January 2015.

Preferred Stock

On October 21, 2010, we amended our Articles of Incorporation in New Jersey to authorize 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.10. The designations, rights, and preferences of such preferred stock are to be determined by the Board of Directors. On November 15, 2010, we changed our domicile from the state of New Jersey to the state of Wyoming.

In addition to the 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, on January 10, 2011, 100 shares of preferred stock were designated as Series A Preferred Stock and 100,000,000 shares were designated as Series B Preferred Stock. The bylaws under the Wyoming Incorporation were amended to reflect the rights and preferences of each additional new designation.

The Series A Preferred Stock collectively has voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total current issued and outstanding shares of common stock. If at least one share of Series A Preferred Stock is outstanding, the aggregate shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall have voting rights equal to the number of shares of common stock equal to four times the sum of the total number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding, plus the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock (or other designated preferred stock) which are issued and outstanding.


In February 2011, we issued three shares of non-convertible Series A preferred stock valued at $329,000 per share, or $987,000 in aggregate, for voting purposes only, to the three members of our management team at one share each. The issued and outstanding shares of the Series A preferred stock have voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total issued and outstanding shares of the our common stock. This effectively provided them, upon retention of their Series A Preferred Stock, voting control on matters presented to our shareholders. They have each irrevocably waived their conversion rights relating to the Series A preferred shares issued.

The Series B Preferred Stock shall have preferential liquidation rights in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, such liquidation rights to be paid from our assets not delegated to parties with greater priority at $1.00 per share or, in the event an aggregate subscription by a single subscriber of the Series B Preferred Stock is greater than $100,000,000, $0.997 per share. The Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible to a number of shares of common stock equal to the price of the Series B Preferred Stock divided by the par value of the Series B Preferred Stock, par value $0.10. The option to convert the shares of Series B Preferred Stock may not be exercised until three months following the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock to the recipient shareholder. The Series B Preferred Stock has ten votes on matters presented to our shareholders for one share of Series B Preferred Stock held. The initial price of the Series B Preferred Stock shall be $2.50, (subject to adjustment by our Board of Directors) until such time, if ever, the Series B Preferred Stock are listed on a secondary and/or public exchange. As of December 31, 2013, no shares of Series B Preferred Stock had been issued.

In February 2014, our Board of Directors amended the initial price for the Series B Preferred Stock from $2.50 to $1.50 per share. Our Board of Directors also amended the conversion feature of the Series B Preferred Stock, to convertible common shares $0.0001 par value, to convert at a 40% market discount to current market value at the time we receive a conversion request. Current market value is defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices. Additionally, when Series B Preferred Stock shares convert to our common stock, the minimum price discount floor level is set at $0.005, as decided by our Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2014, there were 142,004 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

All of the above offerings and sales, except the afore-mentioned shares issued pursuant to a conversion of convertible notes, were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, based on the following: (a) the investors confirmed to us that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and had such background, education and experience in financial and business matters as to be able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the securities; (b) there was no public offering or general solicitation with respect to the offering; (c) the investors were provided with certain disclosure materials and all other information requested with respect to our company; (d) where applicable, the investors acknowledged that all securities being purchased were “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, and agreed to transfer such securities only in a transaction registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or exempt from registration under the Securities Act; and (e) where applicable, a legend was placed on the certificates representing each such security stating that it was restricted and could only be transferred if subsequent registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or transferred in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933.

SUMMARY OF OUR OUTSTANDING DART SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

At December 31, 2014, $542,588 in aggregate principal amount of the DART Limited ("DART"), custodian for Citco Global Custody NV (“Citco Global”) as of July 2012, debentures, as assigned by YA Global and Highgate in April 2009, were issued and outstanding.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, DART had no conversions.

The DART secured convertible debentures are fully matured. We have been in contact with the note holder who has indicated that it has no present intention of exercising its right to convert the debentures into restricted shares of our common stock. The note holder has advised us that it currently is willing to wait until it receives a buyout offer from us. 

SUMMARY OF FUNDED DEBT TRANSACTIONS IN 2014

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we issued unsecured convertible notes in an aggregate total of $901,500 to nine unrelated parties pursuant to the terms and conditions of term sheets executed with investor firms at various times during the first and second quarters of 2014. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2014, we settled and transferred $145,000 of unsecured note balances, plus accrued interest of $114,919, to three unrelated parties in the form of seven convertible notes for $266,151. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2014, we settled and transferred $130,000 of unsecured convertible note balances, plus accrued interest of $4,000, to three unrelated parties in the form of three convertible notes for $134,000. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2014, twelve investor firms converted $936,184 of convertible notes, $28,190 of accrued interest and $6,159 in legal fees, into 2,126,594 shares of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, pursuant to an exemption provided under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933. The conversion prices ranged from $0.0075 per share to $72.28 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we issued an unsecured note in an aggregate total of $50,000 to one unrelated party.


Summary of Funded Debt

As of December 31, 2014, our company’s open unsecured promissory note balance was $1,897,500, listed as follows:

·

$50,000 to an unrelated individual – current term portion

·

$210,000 to an unrelated company - current portion

·

$1,500,000 to twenty unrelated individuals through term sheet with the StrikeForce Investor Group – current portion

·

$137,500 to an unrelated company - current portion

As of December 31, 2014, our company’s open unsecured related party promissory note balances were $722,638, listed as follows:

·

$722,638 to our CEO – current portion

As of December 31, 2014, our company’s open convertible secured note balances were $542,588, listed as follows:

·

$542,588 to DART (custodian for Citco Global and as assigned in 04/09 by YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd.)

As of December 31, 2014, our company’s open convertible note balances were $1,039,519, net of discount on convertible notes of $866,161, listed as follows (month/year):

·

$235,000 to an unrelated company (03/05 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$7,000 to an unrelated company (06/05 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$10,000 to an unrelated individual (06/05 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$40,000 to three unrelated individuals (07/05 unsecured debentures) - current portion

·

$5,000 to an unrelated individual (09/05 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$10,000 to an unrelated individual (12/05 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$30,000 to an unrelated individual (06/06 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$70,000 to an unrelated individual (09/06 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$3,512 to an unrelated individual (02/07 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$100,000 to an unrelated individual (05/07 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$100,000 to an unrelated individual (06/07 unsecured debentures) – current portion

·

$100,000 to an unrelated individual (07/07 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$120,000 to three unrelated individuals (08/07 unsecured debentures) – current portion

·

$50,000 to two unrelated individuals (12/09 unsecured debentures) - current portion

·

$30,000 to an unrelated company (03/10 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$103,387 to an unrelated company (01/12 unsecured debentures) - current portion

·

$75,000 to an unrelated company (03/12 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$36,500 to an unrelated company (11/13 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$50,000 to an unrelated company (12/13 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$40,000 to an unrelated company (12/13 unsecured debenture) – current portion

·

$97,404 to an unrelated company (03/14 unsecured debenture) – long term portion

·

$12,050 to an unrelated company (03/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$26,250 to an unrelated company (04/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$22,697 to an unrelated company (04/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$12,780 to an unrelated company (04/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$37,335 to an unrelated company (04/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$28,750 to an unrelated company (05/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$23,438 to an unrelated company (05/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$32,500 to an unrelated company (05/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion


·

$96,526 to an unrelated company (05/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$60,000 to an unrelated company (06/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$42,000 to an unrelated company (07/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$34,500 to an unrelated company (08/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$13,191 to an unrelated company (09/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$27,750 to an unrelated company (10/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$26,250 to an unrelated company (10/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$78,750 to an unrelated company (10/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

·

$18,110 to an unrelated company (10/14 unsecured debenture) - current portion

As of December 31, 2014, our company’s open convertible note balances - related parties were $355,500, listed as follows:

·

$268,000 to our CEO – current portion

·

$57,500 to our VP of Technical Services – current portion

·

$30,000 to a relative of our CTO & one of our Software Developers – current portion

Based on present revenues and expenses, we are unable to generate sufficient funds internally to sustain our current operations. We must raise additional capital or determine other borrowing sources to continue our operations. It is management’s plan to seek additional funding through the sale of common and preferred series B stock, the sale and settlement of trade payables and debentures, and the issuance of notes and debentures, including notes and debentures convertible into common stock. If we issue additional shares of common stock, the value of shares of existing stockholders is likely to be diluted.

However, the terms of the convertible secured debentures issued to certain of the existing stockholders require that we obtain the consent of such stockholders prior to our entering into subsequent financing arrangements. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain additional financing on terms that are favorable to us or that the holders of the secured debentures will provide their consent to permit us to enter into subsequent financing arrangements.

Our future revenues and profits, if any, will primarily depend upon our ability, and that of our distributors and resellers, to secure sales of our suite of network security and anti-malware products. We do not presently generate significant revenue from the sales of our products. Although management believes that our products are competitive for customers seeking a high level of network security, we cannot forecast with any reasonable certainty whether our products will gain acceptance in the marketplace and if so by when.

Except for the limitations imposed upon us respective to the convertible secured debentures of DART (custodian for Citco Global and as assigned by YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd.), there are no material or known trends that will restrict either short term or long-term liquidity.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.customers.

 

Going Concern

 

The Report of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Contains Explanatory Language That Substantial Doubt Exists About Our Ability To Continue As A Going Concern

We have electedyet to adopt early applicationestablish any history of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

The accompanying audited financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the accompanying audited financial statements, we had a working capital deficiency of $12,135,327 and deficit in stockholders’ equity of $12,199,060 at December 31, 2014, and a net loss of $3,350,230 and net cash used in operating activities of $1,153,413 forprofitable operations. For the year ended December 31, 2014.2016, we incurred a loss from operations of $2,442,620, and at December 31, 2016, we had a stockholders’ deficit of $8,439,490. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 with respect to this uncertainty. This going concern opinion could materially limit our ability to raise additional funds through the issuance of new debt or equity securities or otherwise, and future reports on our financial statements may also include an explanatory paragraph with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern.

  

At December 31, 2016, we had cash on hand in the amount of $804,130. Management estimates that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations through the next six months. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional funds and implement our business plan. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt and equity securities for cash to operate our business. Currently, management is attempting to increase revenues. In principle, werevenues and improve gross margins by a revised sales strategy. We are focusing onredirecting our sales focus from direct sales to domestic and international sales channel, sales, where we are primarily selling through our well-developed salesa channel includingof Distributors, Value Added Resellers, Strategic Partners and Original Equipment Manufacturers. While we believe in the viability of our strategy to increase revenues and in our ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to continually increase our customer base and realize increased revenues from recently signed contracts. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to us. Even if we are able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in the case of equity financing.

 

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

23
 

Table of Contents

Changes in Authorized Shares

In June 2015, an increase of the authorized shares of our common stock from three billion (3,000,000,000) to five billion (5,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in July 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, result of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), we record certain assets at the lower of cost or fair market value. In determining the fair value of certain of our assets, we must make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding circumstances or trends that could affect the value of these assets, such as economic conditions. Those judgments, estimates and assumptions are based on information available to us at that time. Many of those conditions, trends and circumstances are outside our control and if changes were to occur in the events, trends or other circumstances on which our judgments or estimates were based, we may be required under U.S. GAAP to adjust those estimates that are affected by those changes. Changes in such estimates may require that we reduce the carrying value of the affected assets on our balance sheet (which are commonly referred to as “write downs” of the assets involved).

It is our practice to establish reserves or allowances to record adjustments or “write-downs” in the carrying value of assets, such as accounts receivable. Such write-downs are recorded as charges to income or increases in the expense in our Statement of Operations in the periods when such reserves or allowances are established or increased. As a result, our judgments, estimates and assumptions about future events can and will affect not only the amounts at which we record such assets on our balance sheet but also our results of operations.

In making our estimates and assumptions, we follow U.S. GAAP applicable to our business and those that we believe will enable us to make fair and consistent estimates of the fair value of assets and establish adequate reserves or allowances. Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that we believe are material to an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of Americaaccounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s)date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Criticalperiod. Significant estimates include those related to accounting estimates are estimates for which (a)potential liabilities and the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivityassumptions made in valuing stock instruments issued for services and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. Our critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)

Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

(iii)

Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. We consider the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in our overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in our overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. We evaluate acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

(iv)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of our net deferred tax assets resulting from our net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) we have incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) our ability to raise additional funds to support our daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

(v)

Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of derivative liabilities and equity instruments: Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of our common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk free rate(s) to value derivative liabilities, share options and similar instruments.


These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

derivative liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsRevenue Recognition Policy

 

We follow applicable accounting guidance for disclosures about fair value of our financial instruments. U.S. GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. To provide consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally not observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of our financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepayments and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, payroll taxes payable, and due to factor, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Our notes payable, convertible notes payable, convertible secured notes payable, and capital leases payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to us for similar financial arrangements at December 31, 2014 and 2013.


Our Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative financial instruments for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. We valued the automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control; default and follow-on offering provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of a valuation specialist, for which management understands the methodologies. These models incorporate transaction details such as Company stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of the date of issuance and each balance sheet date.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative Financial Instruments

We use Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalue our derivative liability at the end of every reporting period and recognize gains or losses in the Statements of Operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative liability.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We have adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for our long-lived assets. Our long-lived assets, which include property and equipment, patents, and website development costs are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

We assess the recoverability of our long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. When long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

We consider the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in our overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in our overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. We evaluate acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

The key assumptions used in management’s estimates of projected cash flow deal largely with forecasts of sales levels, gross margins, and operating costs of the manufacturing facilities. These forecasts are typically based on historical trends and take into account recent developments as well as management’s plans and intentions. Any difficulty in manufacturing or sourcing raw materials on a cost effective basis would significantly impact the projected future cash flows of our manufacturing facilities and potentially lead to an impairment charge for long-lived assets. Other factors, such as increased competition or a decrease in the desirability of our products, could lead to lower projected sales levels, which would adversely impact cash flows. A significant change in cash flows in the future could result in an impairment of long lived assets.

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.


Leases

Lease agreements are evaluated to determine whether they are capital leases or operating leases in accordance with applicable paragraph 840-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 840-10-25-1”). Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-1 A lessee and a lessor shall consider whether a lease meets any of the following four criteria as part of classifying the lease at its inception under the guidance in the Lessees Subsection of this Section (for the lessee) and the Lessors Subsection of this Section (for the lessor): a. Transfer of ownership. The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessee by the end of the lease term. This criterion is met in situations in which the lease agreement provides for the transfer of title at or shortly after the end of the lease term in exchange for the payment of a nominal fee, for example, the minimum required by statutory regulation to transfer title. b. Bargain purchase option. The lease contains a bargain purchase option. c. Lease term. The lease term is equal to 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property. d. Minimum lease payments. The present value at the beginning of the lease term of the minimum lease payments, excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, including any profit thereon, equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor. In accordance with paragraphs 840-10-25-29 and 840-10-25-30, if at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease; and if none of the four criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1 are met, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as an operating lease. Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-31 a lessee shall compute the present value of the minimum lease payments using the lessee's incremental borrowing rate unless both of the following conditions are met, in which circumstance the lessee shall use the implicit rate: a. It is practicable for the lessee to learn the implicit rate computed by the lessor. b. The implicit rate computed by the lessor is less than the lessee's incremental borrowing rate. Capital lease assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the capital lease assets' estimated useful lives consistent with our normal depreciation policy for tangible assets, but generally not exceeding the term of the lease. Interest charges are expensed over the term of the lease in relation to the carrying value of the capital lease obligation.

Operating leases primarily relate to our leases of office spaces. When the terms of an operating lease include tenant improvement allowances, periods of free rent, rent concessions, and/or rent escalation amounts, we establish a deferred rent liability for the difference between the scheduled rent payment and the straight-line rent expense recognized, which is amortized over the underlying lease term on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense.

Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill

We have adopted Subtopic 350-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for intangible assets other than goodwill. Under the requirements, we amortize the acquisition costs of intangible assets other than goodwill on a straight-line basis over or their estimated useful lives, the terms of the exclusive licenses and/or agreements, or the terms of legal lives of the patents, whichever is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

Patents

For acquired patents we record the costs to acquire patents as patent and amortizes the patent acquisition cost over its remaining legal life, or estimated useful life, or the term of the contract, whichever is shorter. For internal developed patents, all costs incurred to the point when a patent application is to be filed are expended as incurred as research and development expense; patent application costs, generally legal costs, thereafter incurred are capitalized, which are to be amortized once the patents are granted or expended if the patent application is rejected. We amortize the internal developed patents over the shorter of the expected useful lives or the legal lives of the patents, which are generally 17 to 20 years for domestic patents and 5 to 20 years for foreign patents from the date when the patents are granted. The costs of defending and maintaining patents are expended as incurred. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

Website Development Costs

We have adopted Subtopic 350-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for website development costs. Under the requirements of Sections 350-50-15 and 350-50-25, we capitalize costs incurred to develop a website as website development costs, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of three (3) years. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

Discount on Debt

We allocate the proceeds received from convertible debt instruments between the liability component and equity component, and record the conversion feature as a liability in accordance with subtopic 470-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Subtopic 470-20”). The conversion feature and certain other features that are considered embedded derivative instruments, such as a conversion reset provision, a penalty provision and redemption option, have been recorded at their fair value as its fair value can be separated from the convertible note and its conversion is independent of the underlying note value. The conversion liability is marked to market each reporting period with the resulting gains or losses shown in the Statement of Operations. We have also recorded the resulting discount on debt related to the warrants and conversion feature and amortize the discount using the effective interest rate method over the life of the debt instruments.


Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We account for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with paragraph 810-10-05-4 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 810-10-05-4”). Paragraph 810-10-05-4 requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends upon: (i) whether the derivative has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and (ii) the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument based upon the exposure being hedged as either a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.

Derivative Liability

We evaluate our convertible debt, options, warrants or other contracts, if any, to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 810-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then that the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

We mark to market the fair value of the remaining embedded derivative warrants at each balance sheet date and record the change in the fair value of the remaining embedded derivative warrants as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

We utilize the Lattice model that values the liability of the derivative warrants based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model with the assistance of the third party valuation firm. The reason we pick the Lattice model is that in many cases there may be multiple embedded features or the features of the bifurcated derivatives may be so complex that a Black-Scholes valuation does not consider all of the terms of the instrument. Therefore, the fair value may not be appropriately captured by simple models. In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and terms of conversion option (e.g., combined embedded derivatives). The Lattice model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The features that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the exercise and full reset features. Based on these features, there are two primary events that can occur; the Holder exercises the Warrants or the Warrants are held to expiration. The Lattice model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. stock price, exercise price, volatility, etc.). Projections were then made on the underlying factors which led to potential scenarios. Probabilities were assigned to each scenario based on management projections. This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow. A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed to determine the value of the derivative warrants.

Related Parties

We follow subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. our affiliates (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act); b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. our principal owners; e. our management; f. other parties with which we may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.


The financial statements include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitment and Contingencies

We follow subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to us but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. We assess such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, we evaluate the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in our consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect our business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

We apply paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

We derive our revenues from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of products. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via sales invoice or contract; product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the third party carrier and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse terms; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the signed purchase order or contract and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive. When we recognize revenue, no provisions are made for returns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of revenues.

 

In addition to the aforementioned general policy, the following are the specific revenue recognition policies for each major category of our products and services:

Hardware

Revenue from hardware sales is recognized when the product is shipped to the customer and there are either no unfulfilled Company obligations by us, or any obligations that will not affect the customer's final acceptance of the arrangement. All costs of these obligations are accrued when the corresponding revenue is recognized.


Software, Services and Maintenance

 

Revenue from time and service contracts is recognized as the services are provided. Revenue from delivered elements of one-time charge licensed software is recognized at the inception of the license term, provided we have vendor-specific objective evidence ofand determined by the fair value of each delivered element. Revenue is deferred for undelivered elements. We recognize revenue from the sale of software licenses when the four criteria discussed above are met. Delivery generally occurs when the product is delivered to a common carrier or the software is downloaded via email delivery or an FTP web site. We assess collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. We do not request collateral from customers. If we determine that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the fee and recognize revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. Revenue from monthly software licenses is recognized on a subscription basis.

 

ASP Hosted Cloud Services

We offer an Application Service Provider Cloud Service(ASP) hosted cloud service whereby customer usage transactions are invoiced monthly on a cost per transaction basis. The service is sold via the execution of a Service Agreement between us and the customer. Initial set-up fees are recognized over the period in which the services are performed.

 

Fixed Price Service Contracts
24
Table of Contents

  

Revenue from fixed price service contracts is recognized over the term of the contractStock Compensation

We periodically issue stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the percentageauthoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) whereas the value of services that are provided during the period compared withaward is measured on the total estimated services to be provideddate of grant and recognized as compensation expense on the straight-line basis over the entire contract. Losses on fixed price contracts are recognized during the period in which the loss first becomes apparent. Revenue from maintenance is recognized over the contractual period or as the services are performed. Revenue in excess of billings on service contracts is recorded as unbilled receivables and is included in trade accounts receivable. Applicable billings in excess of revenue that is recognized on service contracts are recorded as deferred income until the aforementioned revenue recognition criteria are met. There were no revenues from fixed price long-term contracts.

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

vesting period. We account for our stock based compensationoption and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in which we obtain employee services in share-based payment transactions underaccordance with the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30authoritative guidance of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 ofwhereas the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration receivedstock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the fair value ofdate at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instrument issued, whicheverinstruments is more reliably measurable. The measurement date usedcomplete. Options granted to non-employees are revalued each reporting period to determine the fairamount to be recorded as an expense in the respective period. As the options vest, they are valued on each vesting date and an adjustment is recorded for the difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of vesting. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.measurement date.

 

The fair value of shareour stock option and warrant grants are estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the stock options or warrants, and similar instrumentsfuture dividends. Compensation expense is estimatedrecorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

·

Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term = ((vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.


·

Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

·

Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

·

Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

Our policy is to recognizeBlack-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model could materially affect compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.expense recorded in future periods.

 

EquityDerivative Financial Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

 

We account for equityevaluate our financial instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goodsdetermine if such instruments are derivatives or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equitycontain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for based onas liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices establishedreported in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”),statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instrumentsequity, is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

·

Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

·

Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

·

Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

·

Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.


Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issuedevaluated at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, becauseend of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when theyeach reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been receivedclassified in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet displayas current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determinationderivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.balance sheet date.

 

PursuantTo determine the number of authorized but unissued shares available to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisablesatisfy outstanding convertible securities, we use a sequencing method to prioritize its convertible securities as prescribed by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar instrument that the counterparty has the rightASC 815-40-35. At each reporting date, we review our convertible securities to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if we receive a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (thatdetermine their classification is the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Cash Flows Reporting

We adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. We report the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

We follow the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. We will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, we as an SEC filer consider our financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.appropriate.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

Refer to Note 21 in the accompanying financial statements.

 

Additional Information

 

We fileYou are advised to read this Form 10-K in conjunction with other reports and other materialsdocuments that we file from time to time with the SecuritiesSEC. In particular, please read our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and Exchange Commission. These documentsCurrent Reports on Form 8-K that we file from time to time. You may be inspected and copiedobtain copies of these reports directly from us or from the SEC at the Commission’sSEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth100 F. Street, N.W.,N.E. Washington, D.C., 20549. You can 20549, and you may obtain information onabout obtaining access to the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the CommissionSEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also get copies of documents that we file withIn addition, the Commission through the Commission’s Internet siteSEC maintains information for electronic filers at www.sec.gov.its website http://www.sec.gov.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.


 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.

December 31, 2014 and 2013

Index to the Financial StatementsPlease see pages F-1 through F-19.

 

Contents
Page(s)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1

Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and 2013

F-2

Statements of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

F-3

Statement of Change in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Year Ended December 31, 2013

F-4

Statement of Change in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

F-5

Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

F-6

Notes to the Financial Statements

F-7

 

25
Table of Contents

  

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the UnitesUnited States of America.

 

The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 31 to the financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficitincurred a loss from operations and at December 31, 2014,2016, had a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended.stockholders' deficit. These conditions raise substantial doubt about itsthe Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 3.1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ LiWeinberg and Company, PC

Li and Company, PCP.A.

 

Skillman, New JerseyLos Angeles, California

April 15, 201514, 2017

 

 

F-1
Table of Contents

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$804,130

 

 

$37,153

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

152,009

 

 

 

18,524

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

9,265

 

 

 

4,732

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

 

965,404

 

 

 

60,409

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

8,926

 

 

 

4,184

 

Other assets

 

 

22,539

 

 

 

24,594

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$996,869

 

 

$89,187

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible notes payable, net

 

$1,447,100

 

 

$2,263,695

 

Convertible notes payable - related parties

 

 

355,500

 

 

 

355,500

 

Current maturities of notes payable, net

 

 

1,703,824

 

 

 

2,452,791

 

Current maturities of notes payable - related parties

 

 

742,513

 

 

 

722,638

 

Accounts payable

 

 

890,799

 

 

 

1,295,829

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

9,539

 

 

 

13,368

 

Accrued interest (including $1,029,090 and $939,654 due to related parties, respectively)

 

 

3,805,158

 

 

 

3,921,004

 

Accrued salaries and payroll taxes

 

 

10,549

 

 

 

1,347,772

 

Derivative liabilities

 

 

262,185

 

 

 

989,019

 

Due to factor

 

 

209,192

 

 

 

209,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

9,436,359

 

 

 

13,570,808

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable, net of current maturities

 

 

-

 

 

 

222,991

 

Notes payable - related parties, net of current maturities

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

9,436,359

 

 

 

13,813,674

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' Deficit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series A Preferred stock, no par value; 100 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 shares issued and outstanding

 

 

987,000

 

 

 

987,000

 

Series B Preferred stock par value $0.10: 100,000,000 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,001 and 175,338 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

17,534

 

Preferred stock series not designated par value $0.10: 10,000,000 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

none issued or outstanding

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Common stock par value $0.0001: 5,000,000,000 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,319,683,886 and 22,711,924 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

231,970

 

 

 

2,271

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

24,655,363

 

 

 

22,526,096

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(34,318,823)

 

 

(37,257,388)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Stockholders' Deficit

 

 

(8,439,490)

 

 

(13,724,487)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

 

$996,869

 

 

$89,187

 

BALANCE SHEETS

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013

 

      

ASSETS

       

Current Assets:

       

Cash

 

$

13,129

  

$

7,559

 

Accounts receivable

  

38,507

   

39,454

 

Prepayments and other current assets

  

18,788

   

31,287

 

        

Total current assets

  

70,424

   

78,300

 

        

Property and equipment, net

  

5,522

   

3,989

 

Patents, net

  

17,965

   

20,019

 

Website development costs, net

  

1,500

   

4,500

 

Security deposit

  

8,684

   

8,684

 

        

Total Assets

 

$

104,095

  

$

115,492

 

        

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

       

Current Liabilities:

       

Current maturities of convertible notes payable, net

 

$

942,115

  

$

1,070,467

 

Convertible notes payable - related parties

  

355,500

   

355,500

 

Current maturities of notes payable, net

  

1,897,500

   

1,992,500

 

Notes payable - related parties

  

722,638

   

722,638

 

Accounts payable

  

1,376,300

   

1,237,165

 

Accrued expenses

  

4,683,306

   

4,350,477

 

Derivative liabilities

  

1,415,402

   

519,433

 

Convertible secured notes payable

  

542,588

   

542,588

 

Capital leases payable

  

5,532

   

5,532

 

Payroll taxes payable

  

53,901

   

53,901

 

Garnishment withheld

  

1,777

   

-

 

Due to factor

  

209,192

   

209,192

 

        

Total current liabilities

  

12,165,751

   

11,059,393

 

        

Non-current Liabilities:

       

Common stock to be issued

  

-

   

1

 

Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities

  

97,404

   

70,000

 

        

Total non-current liabilities

  

97,404

   

70,001

 

        

Total Liabilities

  

12,303,155

   

11,129,394

 

        

Commitments and contingencies

       
        

Stockholders' Deficit

       

Series A Preferred stock, no par value; 100 shares authorized;

       

3 shares issued and outstanding

  

987,000

   

987,000

 

Series B Preferred stock par value $0.10: 100,000,000 shares authorized;

       

142,004 and 0 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

  

14,200

   

-

 

Preferred stock series not designated par value $0.10: 10,000,000 shares authorized;

       

none issued or outstanding

  

-

   

-

 

Common stock par value $0.0001: 3,000,000,000 shares authorized;

       

2,453,522 and 3,566 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

  

246

   

1

 

Additional paid-in capital

  

22,249,637

   

20,099,010

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(35,450,143

)

 

(32,099,913

)

        

Total Stockholders' Deficit

 

(12,199,060

)

 

(11,013,902

)

        

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

 

$

104,095

  

$

115,492

 

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

 

F-2

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Year Ended Ended

 

  December 31,
2014
 December 31,
2013

 

       

Revenue

 

$

324,807

 

$

434,657

 

       

Cost of revenue

  

9,658

  

16,967

 

       

Gross margin

  

315,149

  

417,690

 

       

Operating expenses:

      

Compensation

  

331,193

  

354,384

 

Professional fees

  

680,673

  

710,526

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  

283,016

  

245,684

 

Research and development

  

287,646

  

340,600

 

       

Total operating expenses

  

1,582,528

  

1,651,194

 

       

Loss from operations

 

(1,267,379

)

 

(1,233,504

)

       

Other (income) expense:

      

Interest and financing expense

  

1,649,813

  

1,520,195

 

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

  

432,960

 

(312,995

)

Forgiveness of debt

  

-

 

(29,778

)

       

Other (income) expense, net

  

2,082,773

  

1,177,422

 

       

Income tax provision 

  

78

  

-

 

       

Net loss

 

$

(3,350,230

)

 

$

(2,410,926

)

       

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted 

 

$

(11.03

)

 

$

(2,394.17)

 

       

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted

  

303,671

  

1,007

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

Table of Contents

  

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

STATEMENT OF CHANGE IN STOCKOLDERS' DEFICIT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

 

  Series A Preferred stock,  Common stock par value  Additional    Total 
  no par value   $0.0001  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders' 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Deficit 
                           

Balance at December 31, 2012

  

3

  

$

987,000

   

372

 

$

-

 

$

18,217,607

  

$

(29,688,987

)

 

$

(10,484,380

)

                           

Issuance of shares of common stock for consulting services

          

1

  

-

  

3,859

       

3,859

 
                           

Issuance of shares of common stock for conversions of convertible notes payable

                          
          

3,193

  

1

  

1,784,852

       

1,784,853

 
                           

Issuance of warrants for consulting services

                

525

       

525

 
                           

Issuance of warrants in connection with notes payable to the lender

                

64,167

       

64,167

 
                           

Issuance of stock options for employee services

                

10,000

       

10,000

 
                           

Issuance of stock options for patent

                

18,000

       

18,000

 
                           

Net loss

                   

(2,410,926

)

 

(2,410,926

)

                           

Balance at December 31, 2013

  

3

  

$

987,000

   

3,566

 

$

1

 

$

20,099,010

  

$

(32,099,913

)

 

$

(11,013,902

)

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

 

$384,289

 

 

$271,559

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

 

6,363

 

 

 

8,441

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin

 

 

 

377,926

 

 

 

263,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

 

491,255

 

 

 

353,141

 

Professional fees

 

 

 

617,019

 

 

 

471,674

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

 

1,190,609

 

 

 

286,864

 

Research and development

 

 

 

521,663

 

 

 

262,973

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

 

2,820,546

 

 

 

1,374,652

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from operations

 

 

 

(2,442,620)

 

 

(1,111,534)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Litigation settlement

 

 

 

9,750,000

 

 

 

-

 

Fees related to litigation settlement

 

 

 

(4,187,257)

 

 

-

 

Interest and financing expense

 

 

 

(875,234)

 

 

(545,324)

Debt discount amortization

 

 

 

(34,293)

 

 

(851,894)

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

 

 

 

(92,997)

 

 

426,383

 

Extinguishment of derivative liabilities

 

 

 

819,831

 

 

 

-

 

Other income from settlement

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

305,000

 

Other income

 

 

 

1,135

 

 

 

(29,876)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense), net

 

 

 

5,381,185

 

 

 

(695,711)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

$2,938,565

 

 

$(1,807,245)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per common share - basic and diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Basic

 

 

$-

 

 

$(0.47)

 

-Diluted

 

 

$-

 

 

$(0.47)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Basic

 

 

 

1,855,338,114

 

 

 

3,845,454

 

 

-Diluted

 

 

 

1,855,338,114

 

 

 

3,845,454

 

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

 

F-3

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENT OF CHANGE IN STOCKOLDERS' DEFICIT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

Table of Contents

 

  Series A Preferred stock,  Series B Preferred stock,  Common stock,  Additional    Total 
  no par value  par value $0.10  par value $0.0001  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders' 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Deficit 
                                     

Balance at December 31, 2013

  

3

  

$

987,000

   

-

  

$

-

   

3,566

  

$

1

  

$

20,099,010

  

$

(32,099,913

)

 

$

(11,013,902

)

                                     

Sale of shares of series B preferred stock

  

-

   

-

   

142,004

   

14,200

   

-

   

-

   

198,800

       

213,000

 
                                     

Preferred stock discount due to convertible features

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

  

(14,830

)

  

-

  

(14,830

)

                                     

Issuance of shares of common stock and warrants for consulting services

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

63

   

1

   

1,468

   

-

   

1,469

 
                                     

Issuance of shares of common stock for conversions of convertible notes payable

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

2,126,590

   

212

   

657,882

   

-

   

658,094

 
                                     

Issuance of common shares in connection with the exercise of warrants

                  

323,303

   

32

   

8,489

       

8,521

 
                                     

Reclassification of derivative liabilities due to conversion of convertible notes

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

1,298,818

   

-

   

1,298,818

 
                                     

Net loss

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

  

(3,350,230

)

 

(3,350,230

)

                                     

Balance at December 31, 2014

  

3

  

$

987,000

   

142,004

  

$

14,200

   

2,453,522

  

$

246

  

$

22,249,637

  

$

(35,450,143

)

 

$

(12,199,060

)

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 and 2016

 

 

Series A Preferred

stock, no par value

 

 

Series B Preferred

stock, par value $0.10

 

 

Common stock,

par value $0.0001

 

 

Additional

Paid-in

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Total

Stockholders'

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Deficit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2015

 

 

3

 

 

$987,000

 

 

 

142,004

 

 

$14,200

 

 

 

2,454

 

 

$1

 

 

$22,249,882

 

 

$(35,450,143)

 

$(12,199,060)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of shares of common stock and warrants for consulting services

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

17,377

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

148

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of shares of series B preferred stock for financing

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

33,334

 

 

 

3,334

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

46,666

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of shares of common stock for conversions of convertible notes payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

22,691,902

 

 

 

2,268

 

 

 

225,922

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

228,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of common shares in connection with the exercise of warrants

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

191

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,395

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,395

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of stock options for non-employee services

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,083

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,083

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,807,245)

 

 

(1,807,245)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

3

 

 

 

987,000

 

 

 

175,338

 

 

 

17,534

 

 

 

22,711,924

 

 

 

2,271

 

 

 

22,526,096

 

 

 

(37,257,388)

 

 

(13,724,487)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of common stock issued for services

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

154,905,000

 

 

 

15,491

 

 

 

170,668

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

186,159

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of vested options

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

818,462

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

818,462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued upon conversion of notes and interest

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,105,237,983

 

 

 

210,525

 

 

 

368,361

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

578,886

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued upon conversion of Series B preferred stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(125,337)

 

 

(12,534)

 

 

35,703,979

 

 

 

3,570

 

 

 

8,964

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued upon exercise of options and warrants

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,125,000

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

537

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

650

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forgiveness of accrued officers salaries recorded as capital contribution

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

762,275

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

762,275

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,938,565

 

 

 

2,938,565

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

3

 

 

$987,000

 

 

 

50,001

 

 

$5,000

 

 

 

2,319,683,886

 

 

$231,970

 

 

$24,655,363

 

 

$(34,318,823)

 

$(8,439,490)

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

 

F-4

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Table of Contents

 

  For the Year  For the Year

 

  Ended  Ended

 

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013

 

        

Cash flows from operating activities:

       

Net loss

 

$

(3,350,230

)

 

$

(2,410,926

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

       

Depreciation and amortization

  

9,038

   

9,675

 

Amortization of discount on notes payable

  

1,126,800

   

924,470

 

Forgiveness of debt

  

-

  

(30,174

)

Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments

  

432,960

  

(312,995

)

Issuance of stock options for employee services

  

-

   

10,000

 

Issuance of common stock and warrants for consulting services

  

1,469

   

4,384

 

Warrants issued in connection with convertible note payable

  

-

   

64,167

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

       

Accounts receivable

  

947

   

103,836

 

Prepaid expenses

  

12,499

  

(21,340

)

Accounts payable

  

139,135

   

373,461

 

Accrued expenses

  

472,193

   

483,313

 

Garnishment withheld

  

1,777

   

-

 

Common stock to be issued

 

(1

)

 

(18

)

Net cash used in operating activities

 

(1,153,413

)

 

(802,147

)

        

Cash flows from investing activities:

       

Purchases of property and equipment

 

(5,517

)

 

(1,499

)

        

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(5,517

)

 

(1,499

)

        

Cash flows from financing activities:

       

Proceeds from sale of series B preferred stock

  

213,000

   

-

 

Repayment of notes payable

  

-

  

(7,824

)

Proceeds from convertible notes payable

  

901,500

   

689,250

 

Repayment of convertible notes payable

  

-

  

(3,500

)

Proceeds from notes payable

  

50,000

   

-

 

        

Net cash provided by financing activities

  

1,164,500

   

677,926

 

        

Net change in cash

  

5,570

  

(125,720

)

        

Cash at beginning of the year

  

7,559

   

133,279

 

        

Cash at end of the year

 

$

13,129

  

$

7,559

 

        

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

       

Interest paid

 

$

78

  

$

-

 

Income tax paid

 

$

-

  

$

-

 

        

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

       

Common shares issued for conversion of debt and accrued interest

 

$

658,094

  

$

950,107

 

Common shares issued for exercise of warrants

 

$

8,521

  

$

-

 

Preferred stock discount due to convertible feature

 

$

(14,830

)

 

$

-

 

Debt discount due to convertible feature

 

$

1,761,827

  

$

-

 

Reclassification of derivative liability to equity

 

$

1,298,818

  

$

-

 

Issuance of stock options for patent

 

$

-

  

$

18,000

 

Issuance of common stock for common stock to be issued

 

$

(1

)

 

$

19

 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

For the Year

 

 

For the Year

 

 

 

Ended

 

 

Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$2,938,565

 

 

$(1,807,245)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

5,231

 

 

 

7,247

 

Amortization of discount on notes payable

 

 

34,293

 

 

 

876,145

 

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

 

 

92,997

 

 

 

(426,383)

Interest expense

 

 

353,473

 

 

 

545,324

 

Fair value of common stock issued for services

 

 

186,159

 

 

 

2,233

 

Fair value of vested options

 

 

818,462

 

 

 

-

 

Extinguishment of derivative liabilities

 

 

(819,831)

 

 

-

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(133,485)

 

 

19,983

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

(4,533)

 

 

14,056

 

Accounts payable

 

 

(405,030)

 

 

(80,471)

Accrued expenses

 

 

(3,829)

 

 

(7,695)

Accrued interest

 

 

(66,556)

 

 

-

 

Accrued salaries and payroll taxes

 

 

(574,948)

 

 

-

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

2,420,968

 

 

 

(856,806)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(7,918)

 

 

(2,354)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of convertible notes payable

 

 

(687,738)

 

 

(25,000)

Repayment of notes payable

 

 

(1,033,985)

 

 

(53,215)

Proceeds from notes payable

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

539,524

 

Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants

 

 

650

 

 

 

-

 

Proceeds from sale of Series B preferred stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

25,000

 

Proceeds from convertible notes payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

67,000

 

Proceeds from secured notes payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

310,000

 

Proceeds from notes payable - related parties

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,875

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(1,646,073)

 

 

883,184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in cash

 

 

766,977

 

 

 

24,024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash at beginning of the period

 

 

37,153

 

 

 

13,129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash at end of the period

 

$804,130

 

 

$37,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$233,973

 

 

$78

 

Income tax paid

 

 

3,092

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for conversion of debt and accrued interest

 

$192,665

 

 

$228,190

 

Forgiveness of accrued officers salaries recorded as capital contribution

 

 

762,275

 

 

 

-

 

Common stock issued for conversion of Series B preferred stock

 

 

12,534

 

 

 

-

 

Common stock issued for exercise of options and warrants

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,395

 

Debt discount due to convertible feature

 

 

-

 

 

 

61,021

 

Debt discount on note payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

27,000

 

Issuance of Series B preferred stock in connection with secured notes payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

25,000

 

 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

 

 

F-5
Table of Contents

 


StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.

December 31, 20142016 and 20132015

Notes to the Financial Statements

 

Note 1 - Organization and OperationsSummary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

StrikeForce Technical Services Corporation was incorporated in August 2001 under the laws of the State of New Jersey. On September 3, 2004, the stockholders approved an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to changeCompany changed its name to StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”). On November 15, 2010, the Company was re-domiciled under the laws of the State of Wyoming. The Company’s operations are based in Edison, New Jersey.

 

The Company is a software development and services company.The Company owned the exclusive right to license and has developed various identification protection software productscompany that were developed to protect computer networks from unauthorized access and to protect network owners and users from identity theft.The Company has developedoffers a suite of integrated computer network security products based upon the licenses and itsusing proprietary technology. The Company’s ongoing strategy is developing and marketing its suite of network security products to develop and exploit the products for customers in the areas ofcorporate, financial, services,healthcare, legal, government, technology, insurance, e-commerce corporate, government, health care and consumer sectors.

 

Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and PracticesGoing Concern

 

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis of Presentation

The Company'saccompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally acceptedon a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the United Statesnormal course of America (“U.S. GAAP”).business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred a loss from operations of $2,442,620 and at December 31, 2016, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit of $8,439,490. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date that the financial statements are issued. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

At December 31, 2016, we had cash on hand in the amount of $804,130. Management estimates that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations through the next six months. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to continue to implement its business plan. Currently, management is attempting to increase revenues and improve gross margins by redirecting its sales focus from direct sales to domestic and international sales channels, primarily selling through a channel of distributors, value added resellers, strategic partners and original equipment manufacturers. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues, there can be no assurances to that effect. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to continually increase its customer base and realize increased revenues from recently signed contracts. No assurance can be given that any future financing, if needed, will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, if needed, it may contain undue restrictions on its operations, in the case of debt financing, or cause substantial dilution for its stock holders, in the case of equity financing.

 

UseReverse Stock Splits

In February 2015, the Company effected a 1:650 reverse stock split of Estimatesthe Company's issued and Assumptionsoutstanding shares of common stock.

In August 2015, the Company effected a 1:1,000 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

All share and per share amounts have been adjusted, on a retroactive basis, to reflect the reverse stock splits adopted by the Company as if the reverse stock splits had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of Americaaccounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s)date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Criticalperiod. Significant estimates include those related to accounting estimates are estimates for which (a)potential liabilities and the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivityassumptions made in valuing stock instruments issued for services, derivative liabilities, and judgment necessary to accountvaluation allowance for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)

Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

(iii)

Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.


(iv)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

(v)

Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of derivative liabilities and equity instruments: Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk free rate(s) to value derivative liabilities, share options and similar instruments.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsRevenue

 

The Company follows applicable accounting guidancerecognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer and there are no significant uncertainties surrounding acceptance by the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed and determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. When the Company recognizes revenue, no provisions are made for disclosures about fair valuereturns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of its financial instruments. U.S. GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. To provide consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally not observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.revenues.

 

IfRevenue from hardware sales is recognized when the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorizationproduct is based on the lowest level input that is significantshipped to the fair value measurementcustomer and there are either no unfulfilled obligations by the Company, or any obligations that will not affect the customer's final acceptance of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepayments and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, payroll taxes payable, and due to factor, approximate their fair values because of the short maturityarrangement. All costs of these instruments.obligations are accrued when the corresponding revenue is recognized.

 

 

F-6
Table of Contents

  

The Company’s notes payable, convertible notes payable, convertible secured notes payable,Revenue from time and capital leases payable approximateservice contracts is recognized as the services are provided. Revenue from delivered elements of one-time charge licensed software is recognized at the inception of the license term, and determined by the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimateeach delivered element. Revenue is deferred for undelivered elements. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of interest rates that would be available tosoftware licenses when the four criteria discussed above are met. If the Company for similar financial arrangements at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative financial instruments for which there is no current market for these securities suchdetermines that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company valued the automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control; default and follow-on offering provisions using a lattice model, with the assistancecollection of a valuation specialist, forfee is not reasonably assured, it defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which management understands the methodologies. These models incorporate transaction details such as Company stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior asis generally upon receipt of the date of issuance and each balance sheet date.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measuredpayment. Revenue from monthly software licenses is recognized on a Recurring Basis

Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative Financial Instrumentssubscription basis.

 

The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative liability at the end of every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the Statements of Operations thatoffers an Application Service Provider (ASP) hosted cloud service whereby customer usage transactions are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative liability.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include property and equipment, patents, and website development costs are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. When long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

The key assumptions used in management’s estimates of projected cash flow deal largely with forecasts of sales levels, gross margins, and operating costs of the manufacturing facilities. These forecasts are typically based on historical trends and take into account recent developments as well as management’s plans and intentions. Any difficulty in manufacturing or sourcing raw materialsinvoiced monthly on a cost effective basis would significantly impact the projected future cash flows of the Company’s manufacturing facilities and potentially lead to an impairment charge for long-lived assets. Other factors, such as increased competition or a decrease in the desirability of the Company’s products, could lead to lower projected sales levels, which would adversely impact cash flows. A significant change in cash flows in the future could result in an impairment of long lived assets.

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.


Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.per transaction basis.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

PursuantThe Company evaluates the collectability of its trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors. In circumstances where the Company becomes aware of a specific customer’s inability to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-47meet its financial obligations to the Company, a specific reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded, which reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated amount the Company believes will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on the Company’s historical losses and an overall assessment of past due trade receivables that management hasaccounts receivable outstanding. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future shall be reported in the balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs and theCompany did not record an allowance for doubtful accounts. TheFor the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company follows FASB ASC paragraphs 310-10-35-7 through 310-10-35-10 to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-9 Losses from uncollectible receivables shall be accrued when both of the following conditions are met: (a) Information available before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired at the date of the financial statements, and (b) The amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Those conditions may be considered in relation to individual receivables or in relation to groups of similar types of receivables. If the conditions are met, accrual shall be made even though the particular receivables that are uncollectible may not be identifiable. The Company reviews individually each trade receivable for collectability and performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. Badrecorded bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.

Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-41 Credit losses for trade receivables (uncollectible trade receivables), which may be for all or part of a particular trade receivable, shall be deducted from$18,226. For the allowance. The related trade receivable balance shall be charged off in the period in which the trade receivables are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously charged off shall be recorded when received. The Company charges off its trade account receivables against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

There was no allowance for doubtful accounts atyear ended December 31, 2014 or 2013.2015, the Company recorded no bad debt expense.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

 

Estimated Useful Life (Years)

Computer equipment

5

5

Computer software

3

3

Furniture and fixture

7

7

Office equipment

7

7

 

Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Leases

Lease agreements are evaluated to determine whether they are capital leases or operating leases in accordance with applicable paragraph 840-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 840-10-25-1”). Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-1 A lessee and a lessor shall consider whether a lease meets any of the following four criteria as part of classifying the lease at its inception under the guidance in the Lessees Subsection of this Section (for the lessee) and the Lessors Subsection of this Section (for the lessor): a. Transfer of ownership. The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessee by the end of the lease term. This criterion is met in situations in which the lease agreement provides for the transfer of title at or shortly after the end of the lease term in exchange for the payment of a nominal fee, for example, the minimum required by statutory regulation to transfer title. b. Bargain purchase option. The lease contains a bargain purchase option. c. Lease term. The lease term is equal to 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property. d. Minimum lease payments. The present value at the beginning of the lease term of the minimum lease payments, excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, including any profit thereon, equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor. In accordance with paragraphs 840-10-25-29 and 840-10-25-30, if at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease; and if none of the four criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1 are met, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as an operating lease. Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-31 a lessee shall compute the present value of the minimum lease payments using the lessee's incremental borrowing rate unless both of the following conditions are met, in which circumstance the lessee shall use the implicit rate: a. It is practicable for the lessee to learn the implicit rate computed by the lessor. b. The implicit rate computed by the lessor is less than the lessee's incremental borrowing rate. Capital lease assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the capital lease assets' estimated useful lives consistent with the Company’s normal depreciation policy for tangible assets, but generally not exceeding the term of the lease. Interest charges are expensed over the term of the lease in relation to Management assesses the carrying value of property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the capital lease obligation.

Operating leases primarily relatecarrying value may not be recoverable. If there is indication of impairment, management prepares an estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the Company’s leasesuse of office spaces. When the termsasset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an operating lease include tenant improvement allowances, periods of free rent, rent concessions, and/or rent escalation amounts,impairment loss is recognized to write down the asset to its estimated fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company establishes a deferred rent liabilitydid not recognize any impairment for the difference between the scheduled rent paymentits property and the straight-line rent expense recognized, which is amortized over the underlying lease term on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense.equipment.


 

IntangibleLong-lived Assets Other Than Goodwill

 

The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codificationevaluates long-lived assets for intangible assets other than goodwill. Under the requirements,impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company amortizescompares the acquisition costsprojected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of intangible assets other than goodwill on a straight-line basis over or their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the termsexcess of the exclusive licenses and/carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or agreements, ordiscounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the terms of legal lives ofperiod in which the patents, whicheverdetermination is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized,made. For the related costyears ended December 31, 2016 and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

Patents

For acquired patents2015, the Company records the costs to acquire patents as patent and amortizes the patent acquisition cost over its remaining legal life, or estimated useful life, or the term of the contract, whichever is shorter. For internal developed patents, all costs incurred to the point when a patent application is to be filed are expended as incurred as research and development expense; patent application costs, generally legal costs, thereafter incurred are capitalized, which are to be amortized once the patents are granted or expended if the patent application is rejected. The Company amortizes the internal developed patents over the shorter of the expected useful lives or the legal lives of the patents, which are generally 17 to 20 years for domestic patents and 5 to 20 years for foreign patents from the date when the patents are granted. The costs of defending and maintaining patents are expended as incurred. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

Website Development Cost

The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for website development costs. Under the requirements of Sections 350-50-15 and 350-50-25, the Company capitalizes costs incurred to develop a website as website development costs, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of three (3) years. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.did not recognize any such impairments.

 

Discount on Debt

The Company allocates the proceeds received from convertible debt instruments between the liability component and equity component, and records the conversion feature as a liability in accordance with subtopic 470-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Subtopic 470-20”). The conversion feature and certain other features that are considered embedded derivative instruments, such as a conversion reset provision, a penalty provision and redemption option, have been recorded at their fair value as its fair value can be separated from the convertible note and its conversion is independent of the underlying note value. The conversion liability is marked to market each reporting period with the resulting gains or losses shown in the Statement of Operations. The Company has also recorded the resulting discount on debt related to the warrants and conversion feature and is amortizing the discount using the effective interest rate method over the life of the debt instruments.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesIncome Taxes

 

The Company accounts for derivative instrumentsincome taxes using the asset and hedging activitiesliability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

F-7
Table of Contents

Stock Compensation

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized as compensation expense on the straight-line basis over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4the authoritative guidance of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 815-10-05-4”). Paragraph 815-10-05-4 requires companieswhereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to recognize all derivativeearn the equity instruments is complete. Options granted to non-employees are revalued each reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as either assets or liabilitiesan expense in the balance sheet at fair value. The accountingrespective period. As the options vest, they are valued on each vesting date and an adjustment is recorded for changesthe difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of vesting. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

The fair value of a derivative instrument depends upon: (i) whether the derivative has been designatedCompany’s stock option and qualifies as partwarrant grants are estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of a hedging relationship,the stock options or warrants, and (ii) the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrumentfuture dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the exposure being hedged as either a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or hedge of a net investmentderived from the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in a foreign operation.the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

 

Derivative LiabilityFinancial Instruments

 

The Company evaluates its convertible debt, options, warrants or other contracts, if any,financial instruments to determine if those contractssuch instruments are derivatives or embedded components of those contractscontain features that qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment isembedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then that the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compoundliabilities, the derivative instrument.

instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessedevaluated at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will beare classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expectedcould be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 


The Company marksTo determine the number of authorized but unissued shares available to market the fair value of the remaining embedded derivative warrants at each balance sheet date and records the change in the fair value of the remaining embedded derivative warrants as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The Company utilizes the Lattice model that values the liability of the derivative warrants based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model with the assistance of the third party valuation firm. The reasonsatisfy outstanding convertible securities, the Company picksuses a sequencing method to prioritize its convertible securities as prescribed by ASC 815-40-35. At each reporting date, the Lattice model is that in many cases there may be multiple embedded features or the features of the bifurcated derivatives may be so complex that a Black-Scholes valuation does not consider all of the terms of the instrument. Therefore, the fair value may not be appropriately captured by simple models. In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and terms of conversion option (e.g., combined embedded derivatives). The Lattice model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The features that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the exercise and full reset features. Based on these features, there are two primary events that can occur; the Holder exercises the Warrants or the Warrants are held to expiration. The Lattice model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. stock price, exercise price, volatility, etc.). Projections were then made on the underlying factors which led to potential scenarios. Probabilities were assigned to each scenario based on management projections. This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow. A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completedCompany reviews its convertible securities to determine the value of the derivative warrants.that their classification is appropriate.

 

Related PartiesFair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASBauthoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards CodificationBoard (“FASB”) for fair value measurements.  Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:

 

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Inputs, other than the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Personquoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act); b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.indirectly.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactionsLevel 3—Unobservable inputs based on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitment and ContingenciesCompany's assumptions.

 

The Company follows subtopic 450-20is required to use of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assessesobservable market data if such contingent liabilities,data is available without undue cost and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.effort.

 

If the assessmentAs of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurredDecember 31, 2016 and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in2015, the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Ifbalance sheets included the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the naturefair value of the contingent liability,derivative liabilities of $262,185 and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.$989,019, respectively, which were based on Level 2 measurements. 

 

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materiallyThe recorded amounts for accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, convertible notes, and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.notes payables approximate their fair value due to their short term nature.

 

 

F-8
Table of Contents

  

Revenue RecognitionIncome (loss) per Share

 

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of products. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via sales invoice or contract; product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the third party carrier and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse terms; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the signed purchase order or contract and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive. When the Company recognizes revenue, no provisions are made for returns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of revenues.

In addition to the aforementioned general policy, the following are the specific revenue recognition policies for each major category of products and services:

Hardware

Revenue from hardware sales is recognized when the product is shipped to the customer and there are either no unfulfilled Company obligations or any obligations that will not affect the customer's final acceptance of the arrangement. All costs of these obligations are accrued when the corresponding revenue is recognized. There were no revenues from fixed price long-term contracts.

Software, Services and Maintenance

Revenue from time and service contracts is recognized as the services are provided. Revenue from delivered elements of one-time charge licensed software is recognized at the inception of the license term, provided the Company has vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of each delivered element. Revenue is deferred for undelivered elements. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of software licenses when the four criteria discussed above are met. Delivery generally occurs when the product is delivered to a common carrier or the software is downloaded via email delivery or an FTP web site. The Company assesses collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. The Company does not request collateral from customers. If the Company determines that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, the Company defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. Revenue from monthly software licenses is recognized on a subscription basis.

ASP Hosted Cloud Services

The Company offers an Application Service Provider Cloud Service whereby customer usage transactions are invoiced monthly on a costBasic income (loss) per transaction basis. The service is sold via the execution of a Service Agreement between the Company and the customer. Initial set-up fees are recognized over the period in which the services are performed.

Fixed Price Service Contracts

Revenue from fixed price service contracts is recognized over the term of the contract based on the percentage of services that are provided during the period compared with the total estimated services to be provided over the entire contract. Losses on fixed price contracts are recognized during the period in which the loss first becomes apparent. Revenue from maintenance is recognized over the contractual period or as the services are performed. Revenue in excess of billings on service contracts is recorded as unbilled receivables and is included in trade accounts receivable. Applicable billings in excess of revenue that is recognized on service contracts are recorded as deferred income until the aforementioned revenue recognition criteria are met.


Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for share-based payment transactions issued to employees under the guidance of the Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Topic 718”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 718-10-20 an employee is an individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer’s shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to nonemployee directors for other services shall be accounted for as awards to non-employees.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-2 and 718-10-30-3 a share-based payment transaction with employees shall be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued and an entity shall account for the compensation cost from share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with the fair value-based method, i.e., the cost of services received from employees in exchange for awards of share-based compensation generally shall be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued or the fair value of the liabilities incurred/settled.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-6 and 718-10-30-9 the measurement objective for equity instruments awarded to employees is to estimate the fair value at the grant date of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when employees have rendered the requisite service and satisfied any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments (for example, to exercise share options). That estimate is based on the share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, at the grant date. As such, the fair value of an equity share option or similar instrument shall be estimated using a valuation technique such as an option pricing model. For this purpose, a similar instrument is one whose fair value differs from its intrinsic value, that is, an instrument that has time value.

If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in its most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:

a.

The exercise price of the option.

b.

The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term = ((vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

c.

The current price of the underlying share.


d.

The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.

e.

The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

f.

The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-11 and 718-10-30-17 a restriction that stems from the forfeitability of instruments to which employees have not yet earned the right, such as the inability either to exercise a non-vested equity share option or to sell non-vested shares, is not reflected in estimating the fair value of the related instruments at the grant date. Instead, those restrictions are taken into account by recognizing compensation cost only for awards for which employees render the requisite service and a non-vested equity share or non-vested equity share unit awarded to an employee shall be measured at its fair value as if it were vested and issued on the grant date.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-35-2 and 718-10-35-3 the compensation cost for an award of share-based employee compensation classified as equity shall be recognized over the requisite service period, with a corresponding credit to equity (generally, paid-in capital). The requisite service period is the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award, which often is the vesting period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized at the end of the requisite service period for an award of share-based compensation shall be based on the number of instruments for which the requisite service has been rendered (that is, for which the requisite service period has been completed). An entity shall base initial accruals of compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. That estimate shall be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments is likely to differ from previous estimates. The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be or has been rendered shall be recognized in compensation cost in the period of the change. Previously recognized compensation cost shall not be reversed if an employee share option (or share unit) for which the requisite service has been rendered expires unexercised (or unconverted).

Under the requirement of ASC Paragraph 718-10-35-8 the Company made a policy decision to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under the guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services.

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.


Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 505-50-30-2 and 505-50-30-11 share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The issuer shall measure the fair value of the equity instruments in these transactions using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of the following dates, referred to as the measurement date: (a) The date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached (a performance commitment); or (b) The date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:

a.

The exercise price of the option.

b.

The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

c.

The current price of the underlying share.

d.

The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.

e.

The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

f.

The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.


Software Development Costs

The Company has adopted paragraph 985-20-05-01 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 985-20-05-01”) for the costs of computer software to be sold or licensed. Paragraph 985-20-05-01 requires research and development costs incurred in the process of software development before establishment of technological feasibility being expensed as incurred and capitalization of software development costs incurred subsequent to establishment of technological feasibility and prior to the availability of the product for general release to customers. Systematic amortization of capitalized costs begins when a product is available for general release to customers and is computed on a product-by-product basis at a rate not less than straight-line basis over the product’s remaining estimated economic life. To date, all costs have been accounted for as research and development costs and no software development cost has been capitalized.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty (50) percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the for the reporting period ended December 31, 2014 or 2013.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Earnings per share ("EPS") is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic EPS is computed by dividing earningsnet income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stockshares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflectincome (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution, that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-22 and 23 the dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application ofusing the treasury stock method unlessthat could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the provisionsissuance of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 requirecommon stock that another method be applied. Equivalentsthen shared in the income (loss) of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded fromthe Company. In computing diluted EPS. Underincome (loss) per share, the treasury stock method: a. Exercise ofmethod assumes that outstanding options, warrants, and warrants shall be assumed atconvertible preferred stock are exercised and the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to beare used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29Options, warrants, and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. convertible preferred stock may have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options and warrants.

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the dilutive impact of outstanding stock options for 196,000,001 shares and 1,000,001 shares, respectively; outstanding warrants for 0 shares and 30 shares, respectively; Series B Preferred Stock that can convert into 33,876,016 shares and 32,875,063 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, and notes payable that can convert into 25 shares and 291,470 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, have been excluded because their impact on the loss per share is anti-dilutive.

The incremental shares (the difference betweenfollowing tables set forth the numbercomputation of shares assumed issuedbasic and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall bediluted earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Income (Loss) per share – Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) for the period

 

$2,938,565

 

 

$(1,807,245)

Basic average common stock outstanding

 

 

1,855,338,114

 

 

 

3,845,454

 

Net earnings (loss) per share

 

$-

 

 

$(0.47)

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Income (Loss) per share – Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) for the period

 

$2,938,565

 

 

$(1,807,245)

Basic average common stock outstanding

 

 

1,855,338,114

 

 

 

3,845,454

 

Diluted effect of outstanding stock options, warrants, notes and Series B Preferred stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Diluted average common stock outstanding

 

 

1,855,338,114

 

 

 

3,845,454

 

Net earnings (loss) per share

 

$-

 

 

$(0.47)

Advertising, Sales and Marketing Costs

Advertising, sales and marketing costs are expensed as incurred and are included in sales and marketing expenses. For the denominatoryears ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, advertising, sales and marketing expenses were $1,534 and $75,591, respectively.

Research and Development Costs

Costs incurred for research and development are expensed as incurred. The salaries, benefits, and overhead costs of personnel conducting research and development of the diluted EPS computation.Company’s software products comprise research and development expenses. Purchased materials that do not have an alternative future use are also expensed.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, research and development costs were $521,663 and $262,973, respectively.

Significant Concentrations

For the year ended December 31, 2016, sales to two customers comprised 39% and 39% of revenues, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2015, sales to one customer comprised 66% of revenues. At December 31, 2016, one customer comprised 82% of accounts receivable. For the year ended December 31, 2015, sales to one customer comprised 66% of revenues. At December 31, 2015, two customers comprised 67% and 17% of accounts receivable, respectively

 

F-9

The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split adopted on January 29, 2015:

Potentially Outstanding
Dilutive Common Shares
  For the Year Ended December 31,
2014
  For the Year Ended December 31,
2013
 
     

Conversion Feature Shares

    
     

Common shares issuable under the conversion feature of convertible notes payable

 

$

551,488

  

$

6,527

 
        

Sub-total: Conversion feature shares

  

551,488

   

6,527

 
        

Stock Option Shares

        
        

Options issued from January 11, 2005 through April 21, 2011 to employees to purchase common shares with exercise prices ranging from $2,437.50 to $9,750,000 per share expiring five (5) years to ten (10) years from the date of issuance

  

137

   

137

 
        

Options issued from December 23, 2010 through January 30, 2013 to parties other than employees to purchase common shares with exercise prices ranging from $1,950.00 to $8,775,000 per share expiring five (5) years to ten (10) years from the date of issuance

  

2

   

12

 
        

Options issued on January 3, 2013 from the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan to employees to purchase common shares with an exercise price of $2,242.50 per share expiring ten (10) years from the date of issuance

  

5

   

5

 
        

Sub-total: Stock option shares

  

144

   

154

 
        

Warrant Shares

        
        

Warrants issued in connection with debentures

  

29,994

   

95

 
        

Warrants sold for cash

  

43

   

187

 
        

Warrants issued for services

  

26

   

15

 
        

Warrants issued in connection with the sale of common stock

  

27

   

29

 
        

Sub-total: Warrant shares

  

30,090

   

326

 
        

Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares

 

$

581,722

  

$

7,007

 

 

Table of Contents

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

  

Recently IssuedRecent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)

This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The coreCustomers. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle of the guidancebased approach for determining revenue recognition. Under ASU 2014-09, revenue is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transferrecognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services to customersand is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitledreceive in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply In addition, the following steps:

1.

Identify the contract(s) with the customer

2.

Identify the performance obligations in the contract

3.

Determine the transaction price

4.

Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

5.

Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies performance obligations

The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understandstandard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. QualitativeThe FASB has recently issued ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-11, ASU 2016-12, and quantitative information is required about the following:

1.

Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)

2.

Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations

3.

Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

ASU 2016-20 all of which clarify certain implementation guidance within ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within thattherein. The standard can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period for all public entities.  Earlypresented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The Company is not permitted.currently in the process of analyzing the information necessary to determine the impact of adopting this new guidance on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The Company will adopt the provisions of this statement in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.

 

In June 2014,February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Accountingbalance sheet for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“all leases with terms longer than 12 months. ASU 2014-12”).

The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.

The amendments in this Update are2016-02 is effective for all interim and annual periods and interim periods within those annualreporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier2018. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the standard could have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In August 2014,March 2016, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40)ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s AbilityImprovements to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).


In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.

When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):

a.

Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans).

b.

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

c.

Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

a.

Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

b.

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

c.

Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

In November 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument IssuedASU require, among other things, that all income tax effects of awards be recognized in the Formincome statement when the awards vest or are settled. The ASU also allows for an employer to repurchase more of an employee's shares than it can today for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and allows for a Share Is More Akinpolicy election to Debt or to Equity” (“ASU 2014-16”). The amendments in ASU No. 2014-16 clarify that an entity must take into account all relevant terms and features when reviewing the nature of the host contract. Additionally, the amendments state that no one term or feature would define the host contract’s economic characteristics and risks. Instead, the economic characteristics and risks of the hybrid financial instrumentfor forfeitures as a whole would determine the nature of the host contract.they occur. The amendments in this UpdateASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption,2016, including adoption in an interim period, is permitted.

In January 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 “Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items” (“ASU 2015-01”). This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items and the requirements in Subtopic 225-20 for reporting entities to separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015.years. Early adoption is permitted providedfor any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.standard could have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In February 2015,Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, issuedincluding its Emerging Issues Task Force, the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 “Consolidation (Topic 810) -AmendmentsAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”)to improve certain areas of consolidation guidance for reporting organizations (i.e., public, private, and not-for-profit) that are required to evaluate whether to consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (e.g., collateralized debt/loan obligations).


All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:

·

Eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.

·

Eliminating the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement No. 167, thereby reducing the number of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) consolidation models from four to two (including the limited partnership consolidation model).

·

Clarifying when fees paid to a decision maker should be a factor to include in the consolidation of VIEs. Note: a VIE is a legal entity in which consolidation is not based on a majority of voting rights.

·

Amending the guidance for assessing how related party relationships affect VIE consolidation analysis.

·

Excluding certain money market funds from the consolidation guidance.

The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effectimpact on the accompanyingCompany's present or future consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 - Going Concern

The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the year then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Currently, management is attempting to increase revenues and improve gross margins by a revised sales strategy. The Company is redirecting its sales focus from direct sales to domestic and international channel sales, where the Company is primarily selling through a channel of Distributors, Value Added Resellers, Strategic Partners and Original Equipment Manufacturers. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to continually increase its customer base and realize increased revenues from recently signed contracts.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.


 

Note 42 - Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation consisted of the following:

 

  Estimated Useful Life (Years)  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 
       

Computer equipment

 

5

  

$

76,952

  

$

73,540

 
            

Computer software

  

3

   

26,634

   

25,135

 
            

Furniture and fixture

  

7

   

10,157

   

10,157

 
            

Office equipment

  

7

   

16,511

   

15,906

 
            
      

130,254

   

124,738

 
            

Less accumulated depreciation (i)

     

(124,732

)

 

(120,749

)

            
     

$

5,522

  

$

3,989

 

(i) Depreciation Expense

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Computer equipment

 

$76,953

 

 

$76,953

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Computer software

 

 

36,907

 

 

 

28,989

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Furniture and fixture

 

 

10,157

 

 

 

10,157

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office equipment

 

 

16,511

 

 

 

16,511

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

140,528

 

 

 

132,610

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(131,602)

 

 

(128,425)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$8,926

 

 

$4,184

 

 

Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $3,983 and $4,620, respectively.

(ii) Impairment 

The Company completed the annual impairment test of property and equipment and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of property, plant and equipment, exceeded their carrying values at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.


Note 5 - Patents

Patents, stated at cost, less accumulated amortization, consisted of the following:

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 
     

Patents

 

22,329

  

22,329

 
        

Accumulated amortization

 

(4,364

)

 

(2,310

)

        
 

$

17,965

  

$

20,019

 

(i) Amortization Expense

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 was $2,054$3,177 and $2,055,$3,692, respectively.

 

(ii) Impairment

The Company completed the annual impairment test of patents and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of patents exceeded their carrying values at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Note 6 - Website

Website, stated at cost, less accumulated amortization, consisted of the following:

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 
     

Website

 

$

31,331

  

$

31,331

 
        

Accumulated amortization (i)

 

(29,831

)

 

(26,831

)

        
 

$

1,500

  

$

4,500

 

(i) Amortization Expense

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $3,000 and $3,000, respectively.

(ii) Impairment

The Company completed the annual impairment test of website and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of website, exceeded their carrying values at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

F-10
Table of Contents

 

Note 73 - Convertible Notes Payable

 

Convertible notes payable consisted of the following:

 

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 
       

Convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum, matured on March 28, 2008, with a conversion price of $8,775,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

 

$

235,000

  

$

235,000

 
         

Convertible notes bearing interest at 8% per annum with a conversion price of $8,775,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, matured on December 31, 2010. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

50,000

   

50,000

 
         

Convertible note bearing interest at 9% per annum with a conversion price of $1,365,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, matured on December 9, 2010. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of debt purchase agreements formalized among the Company, the note holder and two unrelated parties in September 2013, November 2013 and May 2014, the Company settled and transferred $50,000, $70,000 and $50,000, respectively, of the note balance to the unrelated parties in the form of convertible notes for $50,000, $70,000 and $50,000. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement of the remaining balance with the note holder.

  

30,000

   

80,000

 
         

Convertible note bearing interest at 9% per with a conversion price of $780,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, matured on December 31, 2010.  Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, the note holder and an unrelated party in June 2014, the Company settled and transferred $30,000, and $1,500 of accrued interest, of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of convertible note for $31,500. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, the note holder and an unrelated party in October 2014, the Company settled and transferred $50,000, and $2,500 of accrued interest, of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of convertible note for $52,500. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

70,000

   

150,000

 
         

Convertible note executed in May 2007 bearing interest at 9% per annum with a conversion price of $341,250 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, matured December 31, 2010. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

100,000

   

100,000

 
         

Convertible notes executed in June 2007 bearing interest at 8% per annum matured on December 29, 2010. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

100,000

   

100,000

 
         

Convertible note executed in July 2007 bearing interest at 8% per annum matured on January 2, 2011. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

100,000

   

100,000

 
         

Convertible notes executed in August 2007 bearing interest at 9% per annum matured on August 9, 2010. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

120,000

   

120,000

 
         

Convertible notes executed in December 2009 bearing interest at 9% per annum matured on December 1, 2012, with a conversion price of $102,375 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. The Company issued 1 warrant with an exercise price of $97,500 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, expiring five (5) years from the date of issuance in connection with the issuance of the notes. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

50,000

   

50,000

 
         

Convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum, maturing on March 31, 2015, with a conversion price of $1,950 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

30,000

   

30,000

 
         

Convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum, matured on December 31, 2012, with a conversion price of $9,75,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

5,000

   

5,000

 

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

Secured

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) DART

 

$542,588

 

 

$542,588

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b) Convertible notes with fixed conversion features

 

 

904,512

 

 

 

910,512

 

(c) Convertible notes with adjustable conversion features

 

 

-

 

 

 

824,861

 

Total convertible notes

 

 

1,447,100

 

 

 

2,277,961

 

Discount on convertible notes

 

 

-

 

 

 

(14,266)

Convertible notes

 

$1,447,100

 

 

$2,263,695

 

 

(a)At December 31, 2016 and 2015, $542,588 of notes payables are due to DART/Citco Global. The notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock based on adjustable conversion prices, are secured by all of the Company’s assets, were due in 2010, and are currently in default. The adjustable conversion features of the notes are accounted for as derivative liabilities (see Note 7). DART/Citco Global did not process any conversions of notes into shares of common stock in fiscal 2016 or 2015. The Company has been in contact with the note holder who has indicated that it has no present intention of exercising its right to convert the debentures into shares of the Company's common stock. Under the terms of the secured debentures, the Company is restricted in its ability to issue additional securities as long as any portion of the principal or interest on the secured debentures remains outstanding. During 2016 or 2015, the Company did not obtain DART/Citco Global’s written consent related to any of its financing agreements.

(b)Convertible notes payable consist of 14 unsecured convertible notes convertible at a fixed amount (”fixed convertible notes”) into 13 shares of the Company’s common stock, at fixed prices ranging from $1,950,000 to $9,750,000,000 per share, as defined in the agreements. The notes bear interest at 8% to 18% per annum, and were due on various dates from March 2008 to July 2015. All of the fixed convertible notes are currently in default and the Company is pursuing settlements with certain of the holders. During the year ended December 31, 2015, there were no notes issued or repaid. During the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no notes issued and the Company repaid $6,000 of note principal.

At December 31, 2014, the balance of the accrued interest on the fixed convertible notes was $828,814. During the year ended December 31, 2015, interest expense of $80,286 was accrued. At December 31, 2015, the balance of the accrued interest on the fixed convertible notes was $909,100. During the year ended December 31, 2016, interest expense of $79,687 was accrued, $49,148 of accrued interest was forgiven and written-off, and $3,000 of accrued interest was paid. At December 31, 2016, the balance of accrued interest on the fixed convertible notes was $936,639.

(c)At December 31, 2014, the balance of convertible notes with adjustable conversion features (“adjustable convertible notes”) was $995,167. The notes bore interest at 10% to 24%, and were due on various dates from March 2013 to February 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, adjustable convertible notes of $57,884 were issued, and note holders converted $228,190 of note principal into shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 8). At December 31, 2015, the balance of the adjustable convertible notes was $824,861. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repaid $681,738 of note principal, and note holders converted $143,123 of note principal into shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 8). At December 31, 2016, the balance of adjustable convertible notes was paid off.

At December 31, 2014, the balance of the accrued interest on the adjustable convertible notes was $175,276. During the year ended December 31, 2015, interest expense of $144,294 was accrued. At December 31, 2015, the balance of the accrued interest on the adjustable convertible notes was $319,570. During the year ended December 31, 2016, interest expense of $17,066 was accrued, $189,442 of accrued interest was paid, note holders converted $49,542 of accrued interest into shares of common stock (see Note 8), and $97,652 of accrued interest was forgiven and written-off. At December 31, 2016, the balance of accrued interest on adjustable convertible notes was paid off.

At the option of the holder, the adjustable convertible notes were convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at a price per share discount of 40% of the Company’s common stock trading market price during a certain time period. The Company determined that the conversion feature of the notes were not fixed, and recorded them as a derivative liability. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the payment and conversion of the convertible notes resulted in the Company recording a gain of $819,831 related to the extinguishment of the corresponding derivative liability (see Note 7).

 

F-11

Convertible notes, bearing compound interest at 8% per annum, matured on June 30, 2010, with a conversion price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, the note holder and a consultant in September 2011, the note holder transferred $10,000 of the note balance, including accrued interest, to the consultant in October 2011 (see Note 14). The Company repaid $3,500 of the balance of the notes in 2013. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, the note holder and an unrelated party in June 2013, the Company settled and transferred $33,255 of the note balance, plus accrued interest of $36,920, to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $50,000. Accrued interest of $21,175 was forgiven (see Note 14). The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

 10,000  10,000 
       

Four (4) convertible notes bearing interest at 4% per annum, matured on December 5, 2012, January 3, 2013, January 31, 2013 and March 2, 2013, respectively. The notes bear a default rate of 14% per annum. The Company has accrued the default interest rate on the unpaid balance dating back to the default dates of the notes. The note holder converted $36,660 of the note due on January 3, 2013 into 26 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $1,105 to $1,625 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, in 2013 (see Note 15). The Company is currently pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

178,387

   

178,387

 
         

Fourteen (14) convertible notes bearing interest at 8% per annum, matured on January 6, 2013, February 8, 2013, April 30, 2013, August 5, 2013, September 27, 2013, November 26, 2013, January 24, 2014, March 6, 2014, April 22, 2014, June 3, 2014 and December 13, 2014, and 10% per annum, matured on April 15, 2014, June 13, 2014 and July 9, 2014, respectively. Three (3) of the notes were settled debt purchase notes for balances transferred from a Company’s unrelated promissory note holder and unrelated convertible note holder. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $148,100 of notes dated June 4, 2013, July 17, 2013, August 29, 2013 and March 11, 2014, and $6,820 of accrued interest, into 76,072 unrestricted shares of its common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.286 per share to $72.28 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 15).

  

-

   

95,100

 
         

Four (4) convertible notes bearing interest at 8% per annum, matured on August 30, 2013, November 19, 2013, February 28, 2014 and July 1, 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $17,000 of a note dated May 28, 2013, and accrued interest of $1,579, into 318 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at a conversion price of $58.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split and $32,750 of a note dated October 1, 2013, and accrued interest of $1,725, into 3,681 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $3.65 per share to $27.30 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 15).

  

-

   

49,750

 
         
Seven (7) convertible note bearing interest at 9.9% per annum, matured on June 4, 2014, July 23, 2014 and October 4, 2014, and 10% per annum, matured on June 4, 2014, July 14, 2014 and October 4, 2014. The four 10% notes were settled debt purchase notes for balances transferred from a Company’s unrelated promissory note holder and unrelated convertible note holder. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $86,502 of notes dated June 4, 2013, July 23, 2013 and October 4, 2013, and accrued interest of $7,252, into 3,435 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $11.74 to $58.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15).  

-

   

86,502

 
         
One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 12% per annum, matured on October 18, 2014, including warrants to purchase 94 shares of the Company's common stock at $1.05 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, expiring on October 31, 2018. Per the terms of the anti-dilution reset feature of the warrants, an additional 1,080 warrant shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, were recorded at December 31, 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert the entire note, including $4,200 of accrued interest and $3,200 in legal fees, into 22,280 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $1.05 to $21.49 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15).  

-

   

55,000

 
         

Three (3) convertible notes bearing interest at 9% per annum, matured on November 13, 2014, November 20, 2014 and December 20, 2014. The notes bear a default rate of 22% per annum. The Company has accrued the default interest rate on the unpaid balance dating back to the default dates of the notes. The note due November 13, 2014 was a settled debt purchase note for a balance transferred from a Company’s unrelated promissory note holder. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $28,943 of a note, and $633 of accrued interest, originally issued to a non-related third party on June 6, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 530 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $52.78 to $56.55 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15). The Company is pursuing a settlement with the note holder.

  

86,500

   

115,443

 
         
One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 9% per annum, maturing on December 26, 2015.  

40,000

   

40,000

 
         

Three (3) convertible notes bearing interest at 10% per annum, matured on September 20, 2014, October 8, 2014 and December 19, 2014. The notes were settled debt purchase notes for a balance transferred from a Company’s unrelated promissory note holder. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $58,250 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on February 29, 2008, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company into 1,349 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $21.49 to $66.14 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15).

  

-

   

8,250

 
         
Two (2) convertible notes bearing interest at 10% per annum, matured on March 14, 2015 and maturing on July 7, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $24,950, and $1,489 of accrued interest, of the note due in March 2015, into 231,938 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0377 to $1.02 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15).  

54,050

   

-

 

 

Table of Contents

One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 12% per annum, maturing on March 23, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $52,596 of the note into 321,538 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.039 to $5.85 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15). 97,404  - 
       
Three (3) convertible notes bearing interest at 10% per annum, matured on March 24, 2015, and maturing on June 23, 2015 and September 23, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $37,000 of the note due in March 2015(the full balance), and $2,114 of accrued interest, and $23,809 of a back-end note originally issued to the note holder on March 24, 2014, into 395,853 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0377 to $1.06 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15).  

73,191

   

-

 
         

Convertible non-interest bearing notes, with a conversion price of $5,850 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, matured June 2006 and an 18% convertible note matured April 2008 with a conversion price of $487,500 per share and 1 share of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. The Company is currently pursuing settlement agreements with the note holders.

  

10,512

   

10,512

 
         
One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum, maturing on February 21, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $4,312 of the note, and $1,178 of accrued interest, into 140,769 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at a conversion price of $0.039 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 15).  

23,438

   

-

 
         
Two (2) convertible notes bearing interest at 8% per annum, matured on January 8, 2015 and February 21, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $15,665 of the note due January 8, 2015 into 109,819 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.078 to $0.2795 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 15).  

69,835

   

-

 
         
One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 12% per annum, maturing on February 25, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received a conversion notice from the note holder to convert $3,474 of the note into 92,142 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at a conversion price of $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 15).  

96,526

   

-

 
         
One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing on April 1, 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $37,220 of the note into 238,462 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.065 to $0.585 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 15).  

12,780

   

-

 
         

One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 9% per annum, maturing on April 23, 2015. The note was a settled debt purchase note for a balance transferred from a Company’s unrelated convertible promissory note holder. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $77,303 of the note, originally issued to a non-related third party on January 23, 2009, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 84,979 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0754 to $20.77 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15).

  

22,697

   

-

 
         
One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 12% per annum, maturing on April 29, 2015, including warrants to purchase 611 shares of the Company's common stock at $21.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, expiring on April 29, 2019.  

26,250

   

-

 
         
Two (2) convertible notes bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing on May 30, 2015 and August 8, 2015.  

63,250

   

-

 
         

One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing on October 1, 2015

  

78,750

   

-

 
         

One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing on October 1, 2015. The note was a settled debt purchase note for a balance transferred from a Company’s unrelated convertible promissory note holder. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from the note holder to convert $34,390 of the note, and $334 of accrued interest, originally issued to a non-related third party on September 29, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 341,169 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0377 to $0.7917 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 14 and 15).

  

18,110

   

-

 
         

One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum, maturing on July 7, 2015

  

27,750

   

-

 
         

One (1) convertible note bearing interest at 12% per annum, maturing on October 17, 2015, including warrants to purchase 28,320 shares of the Company's common stock at $0.46345 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, expiring on October 17, 2019.

  

26,250

   

-

 
         
   

1,905,680

   

1,668,944

 
         

Long-term portion

  

(97,404

)

  

(70,000

)

         
   

1,808,276

   

1,598,944

 
         

Discount on convertible notes payable

  

(866,161

)

  

(528,477

)

         

Current maturities, net of discount

 

$

942,115

  

$

1,070,467

 

 

At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, accrued interest due for theall convertible notes was $1,004,089$936,639 and $794,395,$1,230,507, respectively, and is included in accrued expensesinterest in the accompanying balance sheets. Interest expense for theall convertible notes payable for the yearyears ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 was $209,694$96,753 and $136,020,$224,579, respectively.

 

The long term portion of convertible notes is due as follows: 2016-$97,404.


Note 84 - Convertible Notes Payable – Related Parties

 

ConvertibleAt December 31, 2016 and 2015, convertible notes payable - related party consistedparties consist of 12 convertible notes payable in the aggregate of $355,500. The notes are unsecured and due December 31, 2017. Six notes totaling $268,000 are due to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, at a compounded interest rate of 8% per annum; two notes totaling $57,000 are due to the Company’s VP of Technology, interest at prime plus 2% and prime plus 4% per annum; and four notes totaling $30,000 are due to the spouse of the following:Company’s Chief Technology Officer at a compounded interest rate of 8% per annum. $33,000 of the notes are convertible at the fixed conversion price of $7,312,500 per share and $322,500 of the notes are convertible at the fixed conversion price of $9,750,000,000 per share, as defined in the note agreements.

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 
     

Convertible note with the VP of Technology bearing interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum with a conversion price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, originally matured on September 30, 2010. The Company issued 1 warrant with an exercise price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015.

 

$

50,000

  

$

50,000

 
        

Convertible note with the VP of Technology bearing interest at the prime rate plus 4% per annum with a conversion price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, originally matured on September 30, 2010. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015.

  

7,500

   

7,500

 
        

Convertible notes with the CEO bearing interest at 8% per annum with a conversion price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, originally matured on April 30, 2011. The Company issued 1 warrants with an exercise price of $9,750,000 per share which expire August 16, 2015. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. In January 2015, the notes were extended to December 31, 2015.

  

230,000

   

230,000

 
        

Convertible notes with an employee bearing interest at 8% per annum with a conversion price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, originally matured on June 30, 2010. The Company issued 1 warrant with an exercise price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and expiration dates of August 26, 2015 and September 29, 2015. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. In January 2015, the notes were extended to December 31, 2015.

  

15,000

   

15,000

 
        

Convertible note with an employee bearing interest at 8% per annum with a conversion price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, originally matured on June 30, 2010. The Company issued 1 warrant with an exercise price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and an expiration date of December 6, 2015. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015.

  

10,000

   

10,000

 
        

Convertible notes with the CEO bearing compound interest at 8% per annum with a conversion price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, originally matured on April 30, 2011. The Company issued 1 warrant with an exercise price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, expiring January 18, 2016 and February 28, 2016, respectively. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. In January 2015, the notes were extended to December 31, 2015.

  

38,000

   

38,000

 
        

Convertible note with an employee bearing compound interest at 8% per annum with a conversion price of $7,312.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, originally matured on June 30, 2010. The Company issued 1 warrant with an exercise price of $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, expiring March 6, 2016. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015.

  

5,000

   

5,000

 
        
 

355,500

  $

355,500

 

 

At December 31, 2014, and 2013, accrued interest due for the convertible notes – related parties was $339,812 and $292,449, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets. Interest expense for convertible notes payable – related parties for$339,812. During the year ended December 31, 20142015, interest expense of $51,189 was accrued and 2013at December 31, 2015, accrued interest due for the convertible notes – related parties was $47,363$391,001. During the year ended December 31, 2016, interest expense of $55,721 was accrued, and $43,843, respectively.$9,417 of accrued interest due a former officer was forgiven and written-off. At December 31, 2016, accrued interest due for the convertible notes – related parties was $437,305.


 

Note 95 - Notes Payable

 

Notes payable consisted of the following:

 

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 
     

Seventy (70) units, with each unit consisting of a 10% promissory note of $25,000, matured from January 22, 2011 through December 18, 2011 with a 10% discount rate, and 1 non-dilutable (for one (1) year) restricted share of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and at market price. Pursuant to the terms and condition of a debt purchase agreement among certain note holders, the Company and the Consultant formalized in September 2011, the certain note holders transferred certain notes with the principal amount of $50,000 and $25,000, including accrued interest, in July 2011 and August 2011, respectively, to the consultant. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a settlement agreement that the Company executed with the estate of a deceased note holder in November 2011, the Company settled a $25,000 note for restricted shares of its common stock, in December 2011, issued to two (2) beneficiaries of the estate (see Notes 14 and 15). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of debt purchase agreements formalized among the Company, the note holder and two unrelated parties in September 2013, October 2013 and December 2013, the Company settled and transferred $100,000 of the note balance to the unrelated parties in the form of four (4) convertible notes for $25,000 each. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of debt purchase agreements formalized among the Company, the note holder and an unrelated party in January 2014, March 2014, April 2014, May 2014 and June 2014, the Company settled and transferred $25,000 of the note balance and $93,768 of accrued interest to the unrelated party in the form of five (5) convertible notes for $25,000 each for the first four notes and $18,768 for the June 2014 note. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt transfer agreement that the Company executed with the note holder and an unrelated party in July 2014, the Company transferred $25,000 of the note balance and $16,151 of accrued interest to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $41,151, with no additional consideration to the Company. The Company is currently pursuing extensions on the remaining notes.

 

$

1,500,000

  

$

1,550,000

 
        

Promissory notes of $225,000 bearing interest at 10% per annum, matured on January 23, 2012, with a total of 1 share of common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of debt purchase agreements formalized among the Company, the note holder and an unrelated party in July 2013, October 2013 and April 2014, the Company transferred $60,000, $70,000, and $90,000 and $5,000 of accrued interest, respectively, of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible notes for $60,000, $70,000 and $95,000 (see Notes 14 and 15). A promissory note of $50,000, bearing interest at 8% per annum, maturing on July 22, 2015. The Company is currently pursuing extensions for the past due notes.

  

50,000

   

95,000

 
        

Two (2) units with each unit consisting of a 10% promissory note of $25,000, matured on April 20, 2012, and 1 restricted share of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and at market price. The share was issued in June 2009. The Company is currently pursuing extensions.

  

50,000

   

50,000

 
        

One (1) unit consisting of a 10% promissory note of $25,000, matured on June 8, 2012, and 1 restricted share of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and at market price. The share was issued in June 2009. The Company is currently pursuing an extension.

  

25,000

   

25,000

 
        

Three (3) units with each unit consisting of a 10% promissory note of $25,000, matured on June 25, 2012, and 1 restricted share of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and at market price. The share was issued in August 2009. The Company is currently pursuing extensions.

  

75,000

   

75,000

 
        

1.4 units with each unit consisting of a 10% promissory note of $25,000, matured on July 14, 2012 and 1 restricted share of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and at market price. The share was issued in August 2009. The Company is currently pursuing an extension.

  

35,000

   

35,000

 
        

One (1) unit consisting of a 10% promissory note of $25,000, matured on August 18, 2012 and 1 restricted share of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and at market price. The Company is currently pursuing an extension.

  

25,000

   

25,000

 
        

Promissory notes executed in July 2011 bearing interest at 10% per annum, matured on December 31, 2011. The notes bear a default rate of 14% per annum. The Company has accrued the default interest rate on the unpaid balance dating back to the default date of the notes. The Company is currently pursuing extensions.

  

87,500

   

87,500

 
        

A promissory note executed in August 2011 bearing interest at 10% per annum, matured on December 31, 2011. The note bears a default rate of 14% per annum. The Company has accrued the default interest rate on the unpaid balance dating back to the default date of the note. The Company is currently pursuing an extension.

  

50,000

   

50,000

 
        
  

1,897,500

   

1,992,500

 
        

Long-term portion

  

(-

  

(-

        
  

1,897,500

   

1,992,500

 
        

Discount on convertible notes payable

  

(-

)  

(-

        

Current maturities, net of discount

 

$

1,897,500

  

$

1,992,500

 

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

Secured

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Promissory note-H. Group Partners, Inc.

 

$-

 

 

$310,000

 

(b) Promissory note - factoring

 

 

-

 

 

 

35,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c) Promissory notes

 

 

413,824

 

 

 

467,609

 

(d) Promissory note-Cyber Safety

 

 

-

 

 

 

408,000

 

(e) Promissory notes – StrikeForce Investor Group

 

 

1,290,000

 

 

 

1,475,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total notes payable

 

 

1,703,824

 

 

 

2,695,809

 

Discount on secured notes payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

(20,027)

Notes payable, net of discount

 

 

1,703,824

 

 

 

2,675,782

 

Long-term portion

 

 

-

 

 

 

(222,991)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Promissory notes, current maturities

 

$1,703,824

 

 

$2,452,791

 

(a)In May 2015, the Company executed a secured promissory note with an unrelated party for $310,000, bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing March 31, 2018. The note was secured by the Company's intellectual property, accounts, fixtures and property. As an inducement to make the loan, the note holder received 16,667 shares Series B preferred stock valued at $1.50 per share that are convertible into shares of the Company's common stock at a 30% discount to current market value, as defined. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repaid $310,000 of note principal, $23,611 of accrued interest, and $204,560 of additional interest expense was paid to the note holder.

(b)In October 2015, the Company entered into a promissory note agreement for $50,400, secured by all accounts, chattel paper, equipment, general intangibles, instruments and inventory, as defined in the agreement. As December 31, 2015, the balance of the note was $35,200. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repaid the balance of $35,200.

(c)Notes payable consists of various unsecured promissory notes with interest from 8% to 14% per annum. $397,500 of the notes were due on various dates from December 2011 to July 2015 and are currently in default, and the balance of $16,324 is due July 2017. The Company is currently pursuing settlements with certain of the note holders. At December 31, 2014, the balance due under these notes was $397,500. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued $123,324 of notes, and repaid $53,215 of notes. At December 31, 2015, the balance due under these notes was $467,609. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid off note principal totaling $53,785, and at December 31, 2016, the balance due under these notes was $413,824.

At December 31, 2015, the balance of the accrued interest on the notes payable-various was $438,782. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $45,681 of interest expense was accrued, and $70,121 was forgiven and written-off. At December 31, 2016, accrued interest on the notes payable was $414,342.

F-12
Table of Contents

(d)In 2015, the Company issued a note to Cyber Security in relation to an asset purchase and licensing agreement (see Note 13). At December 31, 2015, the balance of note payable was $408,000, and due December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company borrowed an additional $75,000 of principal and repaid $450,000 of principal. In addition, $33,000 of principal was adjusted and written off. At December 31, 2016, the balance of the note was paid off. The note was non-interest bearing and unsecured.

(e)Notes payable to StrikeForce Investor Group (SIG), made up of various investors with unsecured notes, interest at 10% per annum. At December 31, 2016, Notes payable-SIG of $1,250,000, originally due in 2011, are in default, and the balance of $40,000 is due April 30, 2017. The Company is currently pursuing extensions on the delinquent notes. At December 31, 2014, the balance of notes payable-SIG was $1,500,000. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repaid $25,000 of principal and at December 31, 2015, the balance of notes payable-SIG was $1,475,000. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repaid $185,000 of principal and at December 31, 2016, the balance of notes payable-SIG was $1,290,000.

At December 31, 2014, the balance of the accrued interest on the notes payable-SIG was $1,145,271. During the year ended December 31, 2015, $147,821 of interest expense was accrued. At December 31, 2015, the balance of the accrued interest on the notes payable-SIG was $1,293,092. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $141,995 of interest expense was accrued, and $10,000 of accrued interest was paid. At December 31, 2016, accrued interest on the notes payable-SIG was $1,425,087.

 

At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, accrued interest due for theall notes payable above was $1,539,206$1,839,429 and $1,329,835,$1,731,874, respectively, and is included in accrued expensesinterest in the accompanying balance sheets. Interest expense for notes payable for the yearyears ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 was $209,371$190,478 and $222,196,$192,668, respectively.

 


Note 106 - Notes Payable – Related PartiesParty

 

Notes payable- related party consist of 18 unsecured notes payable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer ranging in interest rates of 0% per annum to 10% per annum. The notes have extended due dates of December 31, 2017 and all are shown as current liabilities. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the balance of the outstanding notes payable - related party consisted of the following:was $742,513 and $722,618, respectively.

  

December 31,
2014

  December 31,
2013
 
     

Promissory notes executed with the CEO bearing interest at an amended rate of 8% per annum originally matured on April 30, 2011. In January 2015, the notes were extended to December 31, 2015.

 

$

504,000

  

$

504,000

 
        

A promissory note executed with the CEO bearing interest at 9% per annum originally matured on April 30, 2011. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015.

  

100,000

   

100,000

 
        

A promissory note with the CEO bearing interest at 8% per annum originally matured on April 30, 2011. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015.

  

22,000

   

22,000

 
        

Two (2) 10% promissory notes, with the CEO, of $25,000 and 1 restricted share of the Company’s common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, at market price, originally matured on April 30, 2011. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015.

  

50,000

   

50,000

 
        

Promissory notes with the CEO, non-interest bearing, originally matured on April 30, 2011. Partial payments of $6,580 were made towards the notes in August and September 2010 and $2,700 in February 2011. In January 2015, the notes were extended to December 31, 2015.

  

31,420

   

31,420

 
        

In October 2010, the Company assigned the proceeds of six (6) open accounts receivable invoices, totaling $20,761, to its CEO. The assignment was non-interest bearing and fee free with a due date of November 20, 2010. Partial repayments were made in October 2010 for $4,218 and November 2010 for $4,125. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015 (see Note 14).

  

12,418

   

12,418

 
        

A promissory note executed in March 2011 with the CEO, non-interest bearing, originally matured on April 1, 2011. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015.

  

2,800

   

2,800

 
        
 

$

722,638

  

$

722,638

 

 

At December 31, 2014 and 2013,2015, accrued interest due for the notes payable – related partiesparty was $492,573$548,653. During the year ended December 31, 2016, interest expense of $56,233 was accrued, and $436,493, respectively,accrued interest of $13,102 owed to a former officer was forgiven and is included inwritten-off. At December 31, 2016, accrued expenses ininterest due for the accompanying balance sheets.notes payable – related party was $591,784. Interest expense for notes payable - related partiesparty for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 20132015 was $56,080 and $56,080, respectively.$56,080.


Note 11 - Convertible Secured Notes Payable

Convertible secured notes payable consisted of the following:

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 
     

DART Limited (custodian for Citco Global and as assigned from YA Global/Highgate) (“DART”)

 

$

542,588

  

$

542,588

 
        

Current maturities, net of discount

 

$

542,588

  

$

542,588

 

At December 31, 2014, the Company's outstanding convertible secured notes payable are secured through the note holder's claim on the Company's intellectual property.

The DART secured convertible debentures are matured. The Company has been in contact with the note holder who has indicated that it has no present intention of exercising its right to convert the debentures into restricted shares of the Company's common stock.

Conversions to Common Stock

For the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, DART and Citco Global had no conversions.

 

Note 127 - Derivative Financial Instruments

 

AsUnder authoritative guidance issued by the FASB, instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions, are deemed to be derivative instruments. The conversion feature of December 31, 2014,certain of the Company’s derivative financial instruments are embedded derivatives associated with the Company’s secured and certain unsecured convertible notes certain warrant agreements and Series B preferredpayable (see Note 3) did not have fixed settlement provisions because the ultimate determination of shares to be issued could exceed current available authorized shares.

 

The Company’s secured convertible debentures were issued to YA Global and Highgate in 2005, further assigned to Citco Global. In July 2012,accordance with the Company was notified by Citco Global that the custodian for the Citco Global Notes is D.A.R.T. Limited (“DART”). The Citco Global Notes, under custodian of D.A.R.T Limited (“DART”) and herein after referred to as the “DART Notes”. The Company’s unsecured convertible debentures were issued to nineteen (19) unrelated investors firms: International Capital Group (“ICG”), Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”), Auctus Private Equity Fund (“Auctus”), Herbert Klei (“Klei”), Iconic Holdings, LLC (“Iconic”), Southridge Partners II, LP ("Southridge"), Tonaquint, Inc. ("Tonaquint"), WHC Capital, LLC ("WHC"), James Solakian ("Solakian"), Tarpon Bay Partners ("Tarpon"), LG Capital Funding, LLC ("LG Capital"), JMJ Financial ("JMJ") Adar Bays, LLC ("Adar Bays"), Vista Capital Investments, LLC ("Vista"), KBM Worldwide, Inc. ("KBM"), JSJ Investments Inc. ("JSJ"), GEL Properties, LLC ("GEL"), Black Arch Opportunity Fund LP (“Black Arch”) and Union Capital, LLC (“Union”). These secured and unsecured convertible debentures are hybrid instruments, which individually warrant separate accounting as a derivative instrument (see Notes 7 and 11).

In October 2013, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Tonaquint which included five year warrants for 94 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $260, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, subject to adjustments (see Note 15). Per the terms of the reset feature of the warrants, an additional 1,080 warrant shares were issued at December 31, 2014, for a total of 1,174 warrant shares (Tonaquint Warrants #1). For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received warrant exercise notices from the warrant holder to convert 110 warrant shares into 323,303 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at exercise prices ranging from $0.039 to $1,053 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 7 and 15).

In April 2014, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Tonaquint which included five year warrants for 611 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $21.50, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, subject to adjustments (Tonaquint Warrants #2) (see Note 15). As of December 31, 2014, no warrants have been exercised from this agreement.

In October 2014, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Tonaquint which included five year warrants for 28,320 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $0.46345, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, subject to adjustments (Tonaquint Warrants #3) (see Note 15). As of December 31, 2014, no warrants have been exercised from this agreement.

The prices for the warrants are established at the time of issuance. Because the warrants have reset features (full reset feature and certain anti-dilution rights) based upon the issuance of equity securities by the Company in the future (the exercise price reset floor is adjusted in the initial 6 months from issuance), they are subject to derivative liability treatment.


For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company sold subscriptions to five individuals for the purchase of shares of its Series B preferred stock at $1.50 per share. The Company sold a total of 142,004 shares, for $213,000, that are convertible into shares of its common stock at a 40% discount to current market value, defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices upon receipt of a conversion notice, and with a minimum price level set by the Company's Board of Directors at $0.005. The Series B preferred shares can be converted at any time after six months from the subscription agreements, but only once every 30 days (see Note 15). Because ofFASB authoritative guidance, the conversion feature of the Series B preferred shares, they are subject to derivative liability treatment.

Valuation of Derivative Financial Instruments

(1)

Valuation Methodology

The Company has utilized a third party valuation consultant to assist the Company to fair value the derivative financial instruments (the Convertible Notes, Preferred Stockwas separated from the host contract and Warrants) usingrecognized as a multinomial lattice models that values the derivative liabilities withininstrument. The conversion feature of the financial instruments based onhas been characterized as a probability weighted discount cash flow model. These models are based on future projectionsderivative liability and was re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the various potential outcomes. The featureschange in value reported in the note that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the conversion feature with the reset provisions and the default provisions. Based on these features, there are four primary events that can occur; payments are made in cash; payments are made with stock; the Holder converts the note; the company redeems the note or the company defaults on the note.

The model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced whichstatement of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. interest rates, stock price, conversion price, etc.). Projections were then made on these underlying factors which led to a set of potential scenarios. Probabilities were assigned to each of these scenarios over the remaining term of the note based on management projections. This led to a cash flow projection over the life of the note and a probability associated with that cash flow. A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed, and it was compared to the discounted cash flow of the note without the embedded features, thus determining a value for the derivative liability at the date of valuation.

(2)

Valuation Assumptions - Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability Related to DART Notes

The existing derivative instruments were valued as of December 31, 2014. The conversion price was the lower of $42.25 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, or 80% of the lowest bid price five days prior to conversion. The following assumptions were used for the valuation of the derivative liability related to the Notes at December 31, 2014:

·

The principal balance of the DART Notes of $542,588;

·

The stock price of $0.0649, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, is based on market data as of December 31, 2014;

·

An event of default (in default as of 12/31/14) would occur 50% of the time, increasing 0.10% per month to a maximum of 95% with the Company most likely to negotiate an extension;

·

Alternative financing would be initially available to redeem the note 10% of the time and increase monthly by 0.1% to a maximum of 20%:

·

The monthly trading volume would average $474,704 over a year and would increase at 1% per period to limit the conversions and stock payments;

The projected volatility curve for each valuation period was based on the Company’s historical volatility:

1 year

9/30/14

487

%

12/31/14

489

%

·

The Holder would automatically convert the notes at a stock price of the higher of $84.50, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (2 times the conversion price or 1.5 times the stock price) if the registration was effective and the company was not in default.


As of December 31, 2014, the estimated fair value of derivative liabilities on secured convertible notes of DART was $35,403.

(3)

Valuation Assumptions - Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities Related to ICG, Asher, Auctus, Klei, Iconic, Southridge, Tonaquint, WHC, Solakian, Tarpon, LG Capital, JMJ, Adar Bays, Vista, KBM, JSJ, GEL, Black Arch and Union Notes and the Series B preferred stock.

The following assumptions were used for the valuation of the derivative liability related to the ICG, Asher, Auctus, Klei, Iconic, Southridge, Tonaquint, WHC, Solakian, Tarpon, LG Capital, JMJ, Adar Bays, Vista, KBM, JSJ, GEL, Black Arch, Union Notes and Series B Preferred stock at issuance, conversion and the year ended December 31, 2014:

·

The notes convert with an initial conversion price of 40%-60% of the average or low of the 1-3 lowest bid out of the 10-20 previous days (the effective rates are typically lower);

·

The projected volatility curve for each valuation period was based on the historical volatility of the company in the range of 486% to 491%;

·

An event of default would occur 1% of the time, increasing 1.00% per month to a maximum of 10%;

·

The company would redeem the notes (some notes at 130% on average in the first 90 days and 145% on average from 91 to 180 days or 150%) the notes projected initially at 0% of the time and increase monthly by 2.0% to a maximum of 10.0% (from alternative financing being available for a redemption event to occur); and

·

The Holder would not automatically convert the note at the maximum of 2 times the conversion price.

As of December 31, 2014, the estimated fair value of derivative liabilities on the unsecured convertible notes from ICG, Asher, Auctus, Klei, Iconic, Southridge, Tonaquint, WHC, Solakian, Tarpon, LG Capital, JMJ, Adar Bays, Vista, KBM, JSJ, GEL, Black Arch and Union was $1,260,430.

As of December 31, 2014, the estimated fair value of derivative liabilities related to the Series B preferred shares was $8,253.

(4)

Valuation Assumptions - Change in Fair Value of Tonaquint Warrants

The following assumptions were used for the valuation of the derivative liability related to the Tonaquint Warrants at issuance, exercise and the year ended December 31, 2014:

·

The warrants have an expiration date five years from issuance;

·

The warrants will have the right to exercise into the now 29,994 shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, due to the initial reset and 1,064 shares after the exercises as of December 31, 2014. The holder receives a significant number of shares as a result of the resets and the effective conversion/stock price;

·

The exercise price resets to a floor which may be adjusted in the initial six months after issuance;

·

The holder may transfer, in whole or in part, the warrants without the consent of the Company;

·

As of December 31, 2014, the October 18, 2013 warrants partially exercised into significantly more shares than a standard warrant based on an effective adjusted exercise price and stock price;

As of December 31, 2014, the estimated fair value of derivative liabilities related to the Tonaquint warrants was $111,316.


Summary of the Changes in Fair Value of Level 3 Financial Liabilities

The table below provides a summary of the changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments and the changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

  Fair Value Measurement
Using Level 3 Inputs
 
  Derivative
warrants Assets
(Liability)
  Total 
     

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

(375,634

)

 

$

(375,634

)

        

Purchases, issuances and settlements

 

(456,794

)

 

(456,794

)

        

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

  

-

   

-

 
        

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) included in:

        
        

Net income (loss)

  

312,995

   

312,995

 
        

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  

-

   

-

 
        

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

(519,433

)

 

$

(519,433

)

        

Purchases, issuances and settlements

 

(463,009

)

 

(463,009

)

        

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

  

-

   

-

 
        

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) included in:

        
        

Net income (loss)

 

(432,960

)

 

(432,960

)

        

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  

-

   

-

 
        

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

(1,415,402

)

 

$

(1,415,402

)


Note 13 - Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 
     

Accrued interest

 

$

2,962,509

  

$

2,587,108

 
        

Accrued salaries and payroll taxes (i)

  

1,714,738

   

1,757,310

 
        

Accrued expenses – other

  

6,059

   

6,059

 
        
 

$

4,683,306

  

$

4,350,477

 

(i) Including approximately $1,300,000 due three (3) of the Company’s current officer/stockholders and one (1) of the Company’s former officer/stockholders.

Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies

Payroll Taxesoperations.

 

At December 31, 2014, the Company recorded $53,901balance of payroll taxes, of which approximately $45,000 were delinquent fromthe derivative liabilities was $1,415,402. During the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company had also recorded $32,462 of related estimated penalties2015, the decrease in derivative liability was $426,383, and interest onat December 31, 2015, the delinquent payroll taxes. In December 2014, the Company determined to re-examine the nature and amounts of this accrued liability.

Section 105 HRA Plan

In September 2011, the Company enacted a Section 105 HRA Plan, effective with the 2011, with an outside plan administrator. Pursuant to the terms and conditionsbalance of the plan, the Company will contribute plan dollars of $1,500 per plan year for employees with single health plan coverage and $3,000 per plan year for employees with family health plan coverage into the plan. The plan dollars will be reimbursed to the employees to offset the cost of health care expenses.

Lease Agreement

The Company operates from a leased office in New Jersey. Per the terms of the lease agreement with the landlord, the Company pays a monthly base rent of $3,807 commencing on July 1, 2009 through the lease termination date of January 31, 2016. The landlord holds the sum of $8,684 as the Company’s security deposit.

Future minimum payments required under this non-cancelable operating lease were as follows:

Year ending December 31:

  
   

2015

 

45,684

 
    

2016

  

3,807

 
    
 

$

49,491

 


Consulting Agreements

In December 2009, the Company entered into a retainer agreement with an attorney, whereby the attorney will act as in-house counsel for the Company with respect to all general corporate matters. The agreement is at will and required a payment of 1 share of common stock, valued at $48,750 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, upon execution. Commencing on January 1, 2010, the fee structure also includes a monthly cash fee of $1,000 and the monthly issuance of 2,500 shares of common stock valued at market price on quarter end date (see note 15).

In January 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company in obtaining clients and investors. The consultant will receive a fee of $5,000 per month and warrants to purchase 1 share of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at $29,250 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. The consultant also received warrants to purchase 1 share of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at $29,250 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, upon execution of the agreement. The warrants have a three year term. The term of the agreementderivative liabilities was one month. The agreement was amended and extended for February, March, April, July, August and September 2012. The February 2012 amendment reduced the exercise price of the warrants to $19,500 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. In July 2012, the agreement was amended for an additional one month extension and the monthly fee was increased to $5,500 and the issuance of warrants to purchase 1 share of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at $19,500 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. expiring three (3) year from the date of issuance. In May 2013, the agreement was amended to provide for a two-week fee of $2,500 and the issuance of warrants to purchase 1 share of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at $3,900 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, expiring three (3) year from the date of issuance.

In January 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company in obtaining investors. The consultant will receive a commission of 5% of all financing raised as a result of the consultant’s efforts. The consultant will also receive, as a commission, 10% of all financing raised as a result of the consultant’s efforts in the form of warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at $19,500 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance (see Note 15). The term of the agreement was two (2) years. As of December 31, 2014, no financing was raised relating to the agreement.

In February 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company in obtaining clients. The consultant will receive a commission of 50% of all contracted revenues and the first renewal of all contracted revenues for new clients and 25% of all contracted revenues for existing clients, recorded as a result of the consultant’s efforts. In March 2012, the agreement was amended to increase the 25% commission rate for existing clients to 35%. The parties may elect to remit commissions in the form of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, with a maximum amount of shares issued in one (1) year not to exceed 5 shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. The agreement also includes performance incentives whereby the consultant will receive bonus restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at the end of the agreement term as follows: one share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, if contracted revenues exceed $1,000,000, two shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, if contracted revenues exceed $2,000,000, three shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, if contracted revenues exceed $3,000,000 and four shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, if contracted revenues exceed $4,000,000. At the end of the first year of the agreement, the consultant will also have the option to purchase restricted shares of the Company’s common stock directly from the Company at a 25% discount of the then current market price on the last day of the contract, up to a maximum of 5 shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. The term of the agreement was one (1) year. In July 2012, the parties extended the term of the agreement to October 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, no revenues were recorded relating to the agreement.

In April 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will provide public relations services to the Company. The consultant will receive a fee of $7,000 per month and $500 per month in the form of restricted shares of the Company's common stock valued on the closing market price of the first day of each month that the agreement is in effect. The agreement term was from May 1, 2012 to October 31, 2012 and may be renewed upon mutual agreement. In October 2012, the agreement was extended to April 30, 2013. In April 2013, a new agreement was executed with the consultant with the same terms and conditions with an expiration date of October 31, 2013 (see Note 15).

In January 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company in obtaining investors. The consultant will receive a commission of 10% cash plus 10% warrant coverage, to be negotiated per deal, of all financing raised as a result of the consultant’s efforts. The warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at a per share price of the dollars invested divided by the strike price of the investment, with a 20% exercise price premium, expiring four (4) years from the date of issuance and vesting over six (6) months. The term of the agreement was one (1) year. As of December 31, 2014, no financing was raised relating to the agreement.


In February 2013 the Company executed a retainer agreement with its patent attorneys to enforce its patent rights as “Out-of-Band Authentication” is becoming the standard for authenticating consumers in the financial market.

In May 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will provide advertising and public relations services to the Company. The consultant will receive a fee of $1,000 per month. The term of the agreement was three (3) months.

In June 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company in obtaining clients. The consultant will receive a commission of 10% of all directly contracted revenues and 5% of revenues contracted through a third party, recorded as a result of the consultant’s efforts. The parties may elect to remit commissions in the form cash or restricted shares of the Company’s common stock (at a share price to be determined), or a combination of both. The term of the agreement is one (1) year with automatic renewals. As of December 31, 2014, no revenues were recorded relating to the agreement.

In June 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company in obtaining investors. The consultant will receive a commission of $5,000, per deal, of all financing raised as a result of the consultant’s efforts. The term of the agreement was six (6) months. In 2013, the consultant received $5,000 as a result of financing raised relating to the agreement.

In July 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company in obtaining lending sources. The consultant will receive a commission of 10%, per deal, of net funding received by the Company as a result of the consultant’s efforts. The term of the agreement is twelve (12) months. As of December 31, 2014, no lending has resulted from the agreement.

In August 2013 the Company executed a retainer agreement with its an attorney to enforce its patent rights, in the State of Washington, as “Out-of-Band Authentication” is becoming the standard for authenticating consumers in the financial market.

In December 2013, the Company entered into a revenue share agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company is obtaining new clients. The consultant will receive a commission of 5% on any revenues resulting from new clients obtained relating to the agreement. Either party may terminate the agreement by notifying the other party in writing. As of December 31, 2014, no revenues were recorded as a result the consultant's efforts relating to the agreement. In December 2013, the Company executed an advertising contract with the consultant for various marketing services to be provided from December 2013 to March 2014, at a cost of $975 per month. In March 2014, the Company executed an extension to the advertising contract with the consultant for various marketing services to be provided from April 2014 to September 2014, at a cost of $875 per month. In October 2014, the Company executed an extension to the advertising contract with the consultant for various marketing services to be provided from October 2014 to December 2014, at a cost of $775 per month.

In December 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the firm will serve as a testifying expert as the Company enforces its patent rights through litigation. The Company shall compensate the consultant at a rate of $650 per hour for consultant services and $750 per hour for services relating to court testimony. As of December 31, 2014, no fees have been remitted to the consultant relating to this agreement.

In March, April, June, July and August 2014, the Company entered into consulting agreements with a firm whereby the consultant will assist the Company in obtaining investors. The consultant will receive a commission of 10% cash per deal, plus warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock, to be negotiated per deal, of all financing raised as a result of the consultant’s efforts. For$989,019. During the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, convertible notes and accrued interest totaling $1,063,845 were paid off or converted into shares of common stock (See Note 3), and the consultant received cash commissionsCompany recorded a gain of $49,700 as a result of financing raised relating$819,831 related to the agreements. Forextinguishment of the corresponding derivative liabilities. Also during the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, the Company issued warrants to purchase 15 sharesrecorded a change in fair value of its common stock, exercisable at $19.50 per share for 2 shares, $29.25 per share for 2 shares, $87.75 per share for 3 shares, $136.50 per share for 4 shares, $143.00 per share for 2 shares and $208.00 per share for 2 shares toderivatives of $92,997. At December 31, 2016, the consultant per the termsbalance of the agreement. The warrant shares have a 50% exercise price premium and expire three (3) years from the date of issuance. The term of the agreements is per deal.derivative liabilities was $262,185.

 

In March 2014, the Company executed a retainer agreement, for $5,000, with an attorney to assist the Company in responding to a February 2014 Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation ("DTCC") inquiry, including the issuance of a legal opinion letter. The DTCC inquiry was resolved in April 2014.

 

F-13

Term Sheets

In February 2013, the Company executed a term sheet with an investor firm and received $40,000, net of a $2,500 closing fee, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In April 2013, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $40,000, net of a $2,500 legal fee, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In June 2013, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $40,000, net of a $2,500 legal fee, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In July 2013, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $37,500, net of a $2,500 closing fee, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In August 2013, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $37,500, net of a $2,500 closing fee, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet (see Note 7). The Company recorded all of the closing fees of $13,000 in 2012 and $2,500, from the February 2013 term sheet, for the year ended December 31, 2013, as deferred financing costs. The fees of $10,000, from the April, June, July and August 2013 term sheets, were expensed as legal fees for the year ended December 31, 2013. In February 2014, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and, in March 2014, received $50,000, net of a $3,000 legal fee, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet (see Note 7). The debentures contain an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12). For the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company expensed $0 and $5,104, respectively, of financing expenses related to the deferred financing costs.

In November 2012, the Company executed a term sheet with an investor firm whereby the firm would invest in the Company $27,750 in the form of a convertible promissory note, bearing interest at 8% per annum maturing nine (9) months from the date of issuance. A legal fee of $2,750 would be deducted from the tranche and the note would include a tiered prepayment penalty. Conversions would include a 40% discount to the average closing bid price of the Company’s common stock for the previous ten (10) days of a conversion notice, using the average of the two (2) lowest trading prices. In December 2012, the Company received the tranche of $25,000, net of the $2,750 legal fee, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In February 2013, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $25,000, net of $2,750 in legal fees, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In May 2013, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $30,000, net of $2,750 in legal fees, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In October 2013, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $29,980, net of $2,770 in legal fees, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In May 2014, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $27,750, net of $2,750 in legal fees, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet. In October 2014, the Company executed a new term sheet with the investor firm and received $27,750, net of $2,750 in legal fees, and executed a convertible promissory note and securities purchase agreement per the term sheet (see Note 7).The debentures contain an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

Debt Purchase Agreements

In June 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a convertible note holder and an unrelated party, the Company settled and transferred $33,255 of the note balance, plus accrued interest of $36,920, to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $50,000. Accrued interest of $21,175 was forgiven (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In June 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $31,814 of the note balance, plus accrued interest of $18,526, to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $50,340 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In June 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company settled and transferred the $50,000 note balance, plus accrued interest of $15,152, to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $55,152. Accrued interest of $10,000 was forgiven (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

 

Table of Contents

In July 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $50,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $50,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

 

In July 2013, pursuant toThe derivative liability was valued at the terms and conditionsfollowing dates using a probability weighted Black-Scholes-Merton model with the following assumptions:

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

Conversion feature:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

0.16%

 

 

0.16%

Expected volatility

 

 

75%

 

 

100%

Expected life (in years)

 

1 year

 

 

.25 to 5 years

 

Expected dividend yield

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion feature

 

$262,185

 

 

$989,019

 

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $60,000group of comparable public companies. The expected life of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $60,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivativeconversion feature (see Note 12).

In September 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a convertible note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $50,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $50,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In September 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $25,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In October 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $70,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $70,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In October 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $25,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In October 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $25,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In November 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a convertible promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $70,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $70,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In December 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $25,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In January 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $25,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In March 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the accrued interest balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $25,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In April 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the accrued interest balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $25,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In April 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $95,000 of the note balance and $5,000 of the accrued interest balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $100,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).


In May 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the accrued interest balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $25,000 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In May 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a convertible promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $50,000 of the note balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $50,000 (see Note 7). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In June 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $18,768 of the accrued interest balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $18,768 (see Notes 7 and 9). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In June 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $30,000 of the note balance and $1,500 of the accrued interest balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $31,500 (see Note 7). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In July 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $25,000 of the note balance and $16,151 of the accrued interest balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $41,151 (see Note 7). Prior to the July 2014 transaction, the promissory notenotes was sold to another unrelated party in June 2014. The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

In October 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a convertible promissory note holder and an unrelated party, the Company transferred $50,000 of the note balance and $2,500 of the accrued interest balance to the unrelated party in the form of a convertible note for $52,500 (see Note 7). The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature (see Note 12).

Loan Repayment Agreement

In April 2009, the Company signed an agreement whereby two promissory notes executed with a distributor of its products were to be repaid from the proceeds of sales of the Company’s products sold by the distributor for the Company. In September 2009, the Company executed an additional promissory note with the distributor that is included in the loan repayment agreement. In May 2010, the Company executed an additional promissory note with the distributor that is included in the loan repayment agreement. In September 2012, the Company and the distributor executed an amendment to the March and April 2009 promissory notes whereby the Company would remit the accrued interest duebased on the notes, in the amount of $10,388, to the distributor by November 1, 2012. The payment was made in October 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, sales proceeds of $1,275 and $12,426, respectively, were applied to the balance of the notes. In June 2013, pursuant to the terms and conditions of debt purchase agreements formalized among the Company, the note holder and two unrelated parties, the Company settled and transferred the note balances, plus accrued interest, to the unrelated parties in the form of two convertible notes (see Notes 7 and 9).

Assignment

In October 2010, the Company assigned the proceeds of six of the Company’s open receivables invoices, in the total amount of $20,761, to its CEO. The assignment was non-interest bearing and fee free with a due date for repayment of November 20, 2010. Partial repayments of the assignment were made in October 2010 for $4,218 and November 2010 for $4,125. The due date of the assignment has been extended to December 31, 2015 (see Note 10).


Due to Factor

In March 2007, the Company entered into a sale and subordination agreement with a factoring firm whereby the Company sold its rights to two invoices, from February 2007 and March 2007, totaling $470,200 to the factor. Upon signing the agreement and providing the required disclosures, the factor remitted 65%, or $144,440, of the February 2007 invoice and a certain percentage of $53,010 of the March 2007 invoice to the Company. The Company paid a $500 credit review fee to the factor relating to the agreement. Per theremaining terms of the agreement, once the Company’s client remits the invoice amount to the factor, the factor deducts a discount fee from the remaining balance of the factored invoices and forwards the net proceeds to the Company.related notes. The discount fee is computed as a percentage of the face amount of the invoice as follows: 2.25% fee for invoices paid within 30 days of the down payment date with an additional 1.125% for each 15 day period thereafter. In September 2007, the February 2007 factored invoiceexpected dividend yield was deemed uncollectible and was written off as bad debt expense. In December 2007, the March 2007 factored invoice was deemed uncollectible and was written off as bad debt expense. In February 2008, the Company and the factor agreed to a total settlement amount of $75,000, which was scheduled to be paid by the Company to the factor in September 2008 unless both parties mutually agreed to extend the due date. In September 2008, the Company and the factor reached a verbal agreement to extend the due date to December 31, 2008. The Company is pursuing a further extension. As of December 31, 2014, the balance due to the factor by the Company was $209,192 including interest.

Litigation

On March 25, 2013 the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (case no: 13-cv-01895 (SRC)(CLW)) vs. WhiteSky, Inc (an existing channel partner). The Company filed claims that WhiteSky effectuated multiple contract breaches, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of Intellectual Property, and disclosure of confidential information in commencing attempts to replace the Company’s “GuardedID® Customized Desktop Product” with a third party's product since November 2012, even though the contractual agreement did not expire until May 2014. In July 2013, the Company filed an amended complaint based on the Court’s rulings on the motions, which required some minor adjustments and strengthening based on what the Company learned through early admissible discovery. In early 2014 settlement discussions commenced and the lawsuit was settled on March 9, 2015 with mutually agreed upon terms.

On March 28, 2013 the Company initiated patent litigation against PhoneFactor, Inc., a subsidiary of Microsoft Inc., Fiserv, Inc., and First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in Wilmington, for Infringement of United States Patent No. 7,870,599 (the ’599 Patent). Currently Fiserv, Inc. is released from this complaint and the Company has amended this complaint, in April 2014, to include the Company’s two additional Out-of-Band patents (Patent Nos.: 8,484,698 & 8,713,701). As of December 31, 2014 the case was in full discovery. As of March 2015, the Markman hearing was held and the deliberations are continuing.

On May 22, 2013 the Company filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey seeking a declaratory judgment that (1) it does not infringe upon a patent for customer authentication technology owned by Authentify Patent Co., LLC (“Authentify”), and (2) the Authentify patent is invalid under the Patent Act. The Company’s action was filed in response to an April 26, 2013 filing by Authentify of a patent infringement action against the Company in Federal district court in Seattle, Washington, claimingfact that the Company has infringed upon Authentify’s patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,934,858. As of March 2015,not customarily paid dividends to its common stockholders in the New Jersey complaint has been droppedpast and does not expect to pay dividends to its common stockholders in the Washington complaint was settled. Per the terms of the settlement, both parties have agreed to execute waivers that guarantee no further legal action against each other relating to this matter.future.

 

Note 15 -8– Stockholders’ Deficit

 

Preferred Stock

 

On October 21, 2010, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation in New Jersey to authorize 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.10. The designations, rights, and preferences of such preferred stock are to be determined by the Board of Directors. On November 15, 2010, the Company changed its domicile from the State of New Jersey to the State of Wyoming.

 

In addition to the 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized on October 21, 2010, on January 10, 2011, 100 shares of preferred stock were designated as Series A Preferred Stock and 100,000,000 shares were designated as Series B Preferred Stock. The bylaws under the Wyoming Incorporation were amended to reflect the rights and preferences of each additional new designation.

 


The Series A Preferred Stock collectively has voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total current issued and outstanding shares of common stock. If at least one share of Series A Preferred Stock is outstanding, the aggregate shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall have voting rights equal to the number of shares of common stock equal to four times the sum of the total number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding, plus the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock (or other designated preferred stock) which are issued and outstanding.

 

The Series B Preferred Stock shall havehas preferential liquidation rights in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, such liquidation rights to be paid from the assets of the Company not delegated to parties with greater priority at $1.00 per share or, in the event an aggregate subscription by a single subscriber of the Series B Preferred Stock is greater than $100,000,000, $0.997 per share. The Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible to a number of shares of common stock equal to the price of the Series B Preferred Stock divided by the par value of the Series B Preferred Stock. The option to convert the shares of Series B Preferred Stock may not be exercised until three months following the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock to the recipient shareholder. The Series B Preferred Stock shall have ten votes on matters presented to the shareholders of the Company for one share of Series B Preferred Stock held. The initial price of the Series B Preferred Stock shall be $2.50, (subject to adjustment by the Company’s Board of Directors) until such time, if ever, the Series B Preferred Stock are listed on a secondary and/or public exchange.

 

In February 2014, the Company's Board of Directors amended the initial price for the Series B Preferred Stock from $2.50 to $1.50 per share. The Company's Board of Directors also amended the conversion feature of the Series B Preferred Stock, to be convertiblepermit conversion to common shares $0.0001 par value, at a 40% market discount to current market value (“current market value“) at the time the Company receives a conversion request. Current Market Valuemarket value is defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices. Additionally, when Series B Preferred Stock shares convert to the Company's common stock, the minimum price discount floor level is set at $0.005, as decided by the Company's Board of Directors.

 

Issuance of Series A Preferred Stock

 

In February 2011, the Company issued three (3) shares of non-convertible Series A preferred stockPreferred Stock valued at $329,000 per share, or $987,000 in aggregate for voting purposes only, to the three members of the management team at one share each.team. The Series A Preferred Stock are convertible into four times the total number of common shares plus the total number of shares of Series B preferred stock issued and outstanding sharesat the time of the Series A preferred stockconversion, and have voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. This effectively provided them,the management team, upon retention of their Series A Preferred Stock, voting control on matters presented to the shareholders of the Company. TheyThe shareholders of the Series A Preferred Stock have each irrevocably waived their conversion rights relating to the Series A preferred sharesPreferred Stock issued. The Company expensed $987,000 in stock based compensation expense related to the issuance of the shares in 2011.

F-14
Table of Contents

 

Sales of Shares of Series B Preferred Stock

 

In February 2014, the Company sold subscriptions to three individuals for the purchase of2016, 125,377 shares of its Series B preferredPreferred Stock were converted into 35,703,979 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.50 per share. The(See below).

In July 2015, the Company sold a total of 25,33516,667 shares for $38,000, thatto an individual at $1.50 per share, or a total of $25,000. In May 2015, as an inducement to execute a secured promissory note, a note holder received 16,667 shares Series B preferred stock valued at $1.50 per share, or a total of $25,001. The shares of Series B Preferred Stock are convertible into shares of its common stock at a 30% to 40% discount to current market value, defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices upon receipt of a conversion notice, anddefined, with a minimum price level set by the Company's Board of Directors at $0.005. The Series B preferred shares can be converted at any time after six months from the subscription agreements, but only once every 30 days. The conversion feature of the subscription agreement contains an embedded derivative (see Note 12).

In March 2014, the Company sold subscriptions to one individual for the purchase of shares of its Series B preferred stock at $1.50 per share. The Company sold a total of 16,667 shares, for $25,000, that are convertible into shares of its common stock at a 40% discount to current market value, defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices upon receipt of a conversion notice, and with a minimum price level set by the Company's Board of Directors at $0.005. The Series B preferred shares can be converted at any time after six months from the subscription agreements, but only once every 30 days. The conversion feature of the subscription agreement contains an embedded derivative (see Note 12).

In April 2014, the Company sold subscriptions to one individual for the purchase of shares of its Series B preferred stock at $1.50 per share. The Company sold a total of 33,334 shares, for $50,000, that are convertible into shares of its common stock at a 40% discount to current market value, defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices upon receipt of a conversion notice, and with a minimum price level set by the Company's Board of Directors at $0.005. The Series B preferred shares can be converted at any time after six months from the subscription agreements, but only once every 30 days. The conversion feature of the subscription agreement contains an embedded derivative (see Note 12).


In May 2014, the Company sold subscriptions to three individuals for the purchase of shares of its Series B preferred stock at $1.50 per share. The Company sold a total of 66,668 shares, for $100,000, that are convertible into shares of its common stock at a 40% discount to current market value, defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices upon receipt of a conversion notice, and with a minimum price level set by the Company's Board of Directors at $0.005. The Series B preferred shares can be converted at any time after six months from the subscription agreements, but only once every 30 days. The conversion feature of the subscription agreement contains an embedded derivative (see Note 12).

 

Common Stock

 

In December 2012, an increase of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from five hundred million (500,000,000) to seven hundred fifty million (750,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in February 2013.

In May 2013, an increase of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from seven hundred fifty million (750,000,000) to one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in May 2013.

In July 2013, an increase of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000) to three billion (3,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in July 2013.

In August 2013, an increase of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from three billion (3,000,000,000) to five billion (5,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in September 2013.

In December 2013, an increase of the authorized shares of the Company's common stock from five billion (5,000,000,000) to six billion seven hundred fifty million (6,750,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in January 2014.

In February 2014, a 1:1,500 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in March 2014.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the 1:1,500 reverse stock split adopted in March 2014.

In February 2014, a decrease of the authorized shares of the Company's common stock from six billion seven hundred fifty million (6,750,000,000) to one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in March 2014.

In March 2014, the Company's transfer agent issued 3 shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split adopted in January 2015, valued at $302, as rounding shares relating to the Company's 1:1,500 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock that was adopted in March 2014.

In December 2014, an increase of the authorized shares of the Company's common stock from one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000) to nine billion (9,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in December 2014.


In December 2014, a 1:650 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in January 2015.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the 1:650 reverse stock split adopted in January 2015.

In December 2014, a decrease of the authorized shares of the Company's common stock from nine billion (9,000,000,000) to three billion (3,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in January 2015.

Issuance of Common Stock for Services

In December 2009, the Company entered into a retainer agreement with an attorney, whereas the attorney acts as house counsel for the Company with respect to all general corporate matters. The agreement is at will and required a payment of 1 share of common stock, valued at $48,750 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, due upon execution. Commencing on January 1, 2010, the fee structure also includes a monthly cash fee of $1,000 and the monthly issuance of 2,500 shares of common stock, valued at market, and the total of which remains 2,500 shares post to the Company's March 2014 and January 2015 reverse stock splits ForDuring the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013,2016, the Company issued a totalan aggregate of 602,296,971,962 shares of restrictedits common stock of which 12 shares were from 2013, valued at $2,980 and 1 share of restricted common stock, valued at $109, respectively, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, all of which have been expensed as legal fees, related to the agreement.follows:

 

In May 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a firm whereby the consultant will provide public relations services to the Company. The consultant will receive a fee of $7,000 per month and $500 per month in the form of restricted shares of the Company's common stock valued on the closing market price of the first day of each month that the agreement is in effect. In 2013, the consultant received 8 shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, of the Company's common stock valued at $3,750. The value of all of the shares issued has been expensed as consulting fees (see Note 14).
·The Company issued 1,594,171,737 shares of its common stock in exchange for conversion of $143,123 of convertible note principal and $49,542 of accrued interest at conversion prices ranging from $0.000058 to $0.0013 per share. In addition, the Company issued 511,066,246 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $386,221, to the convertible note holders and recorded as additional interest expense.

·The Company issued 125,000 shares of its common stock upon the exercise of 30 warrants for $150. In addition, the Company issued 154,875,000 shares of its common stock, with a fair value of $185,850, to the warrant holder as additional consideration for services and recorded in general and administrative expenses

·The Company issued 30,000 shares of its common stock for services, valued at $309.

·The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock for exercise of options at a price of $0.005 per share for $500.

·The Company issued 35,703,979 shares of its common stock in exchange for conversion of 125,337 shares of Series B Preferred Stock at conversion prices ranging from $0.00383 to $0.00532 per share.

 

Issuance of Common Stock for Financing

In March 2010, the Company executed a promissory note for $50,000 with its CEO, bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing on April 30, 2011. Per the terms of the promissory note, the note holder purchased two units with each unit consisting of a 10% promissory note of $25,000 and 1 restricted share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, of the Company’s common stock, valued at $24,375 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, and expensed in 2010. In January 2015, the note was extended to December 31, 2015 (see Note 10).

In May 2010, the Company executed a promissory note for $50,000, bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing on May 21, 2013. As consideration for executing the note, the Company issued 1 share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, of restricted common stock, valued at $8,775 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, to the note holder. ForDuring the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013,2015, the Company expensed $0 and $250, respectively,issued an aggregate of financing expenses related to the22,709,470 shares (see Note 9).of its common stock as follows:

·Convertible note holders converted $228,190 of convertible note principal into 22,691,902 shares of common stock at conversion prices ranging from $0.00024 to $39.00 per share.

·The Company issued 17,377 shares of common stock, valued in aggregate of $150, including 15,018 shares issued for services valued at $123, and 2,360 shares valued at $22 that were issued for rounding shares related to the stock splits of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock in 2015.

·The Company issued 191 shares of common stock to warrant holders that exercised 1 warrant at $1,395 per share.

 

Conversions to Common Stock

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from Adar Bays to convert the balance of a $37,000 note dated March 24, 2014, and $2,114 of accrued interest, and $23,809 of a back-end note dated September 23, 2014, that tacks back to March 24, 2014, into 395,854 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0377 to $1.0556 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from Asher to convert $148,100 of notes dated June 4, 2013, July 17, 2013 and March 11, 2014, and $6,820 of accrued interest, into 76,073 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.286 to $72.28 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).


For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from Auctus to convert $17,000 of a note dated May 28, 2013, and accrued interest of $1,579, $32,750 of a note dated October 1, 2013, and accrued interest of $1,725, and $4,312 of a note dated May 21, 2014, and accrued interest of $1,178, into 144,767 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.039 to $58.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from Black Arch to convert $41,151, and legal fees of $2,959, of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on January 22, 2008, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 25,686 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $1.0205 to $4.979 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from GEL to convert $31,500 of a convertible note originally issued to a non-related third party on September 29, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 8,521 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $1.9227 to $8.671 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from Iconic to convert $86,502 of notes dated June 4, 2013, July 23, 2013 and October 4, 2013, and accrued interest of $7,252, into 3,435 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $11.739 to $58.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from JMJ to convert $52,596 of a note dated March 26, 2014 into 321,538 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.039 to $5.85 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from JSJ to convert $50,000, and accrued interest of $865, of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on June 9, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, and $3,474 of a note dated May 25, 2014 into 113,641 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0377 to $12.1875 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from KBM to convert $15,665 of a note dated April 8, 2014 into 109,819 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.078 to $0.2795 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received a conversion notice from LG Capital to convert $24,950, and accrued interest of $1,489, of a note dated March 14, 2014 into 231,939 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0377 to $1.0179 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from Tarpon to convert $127,018 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on February 29, 2008, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 7,902 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $8.25825 to $66.1375 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from Tonaquint to convert $55,000, and accrued interest of $4,200 and legal fees of $3,200 of a note dated October 18, 2013 into 22,279 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $1.053 to $21.489 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).


For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from Union to convert $34,390, and accrued interest of $334, of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on September 23, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 341,169 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0377 to $0.7917 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received a conversion notice from Vista to convert $37,220 of a note dated April 1, 2014 into 238,462 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.065 to $0.585 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received conversion notices from WHC to convert $28,943 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on June 6, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, and $77,303 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on January 23, 2009, and $633 of accrued interest, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 85,413 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0754 to $56.55 per share, as adjusted by the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received conversion notices from ICG to convert $36,660 of the January 3, 2012 note into 26 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock at conversion prices ranging from $1,098.50 to $1,651.00, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received conversion notices from Asher to convert the remaining balance of $8,500 of the note due February 8, 2013, including accrued interest of $1,300, the full balance of $42,500 of the note due April 30, 2013, including accrued interest of $1,700, the full balance of $32,500 of the note due August 5, 2013, including accrued interest of $1,300, the full balance of $50,340 of the note due June 14, 2013, the full balance of $42,500 of the note due September 27, 2013, including accrued interest of $1,700, the full balance of $42,500 of the note due November 26, 2013, including accrued interest of $1,700, the full balance of $50,000 of the note due April 15, 2014, the full balance of $50,000 of the note due July 9, 2014, the full balance of $42,500 of the note due January 24, 2014, including accrued interest of $1,700, and $22,400 of the note due March 6, 2014 into 887 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $97.50 to $3,022.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company received conversion notices from Auctus to convert the full balance of $27,750 of the note due August 30, 2013, including accrued interest of $1,291, the full balance of $27,750 of the note due November 19, 2013, including accrued interest of $1,308, and $15,750 of the note due February 28, 2014 into 227 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $175.50 to $2,076.75 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company received a conversion notice from Klei to convert the full balance of $25,000 of the note due April 23, 2014, including accrued interest of $1,112, into 89 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at a conversion price of $292.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received conversion notices from Iconic to convert the full balance of $55,152 of one of the notes due June 4, 2014, the full balance of $50,000 of another of the notes due June 4, 2014, the full balance of $60,000 of the note due July 17, 2014, the full balance of $70,000 of one of the notes due October 4, 2014, $50,498 of the remaining note due June 4, 2014 into 1,096 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $58.50 to $1,696.50 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received conversion notices from Southridge to convert the full balance of $25,000 of the note due July 16, 2014, and $375 in legal fees, the full balance of $25,000 of the note due August 4, 2014, and $275 in legal fees, and the full balance of $25,000 of the note due August 18, 2014, and $375 in legal fees, into 277 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $214.50 to $375.375 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).


For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received conversion notices from WHC to convert $41,057 of the note due November 13, 2014 into 279 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at conversion prices ranging from $56.55 to $169.65 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company received a conversion notice from Tarpon to convert $16,750 of the note due September 20, 2014 into 312 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at a conversion price of $26.325 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

Issuance of Warrants and Options for Financing and Acquiring ServicesContribution

 

In connection with consulting agreements, the Company issued warrants for 14 shares, as adjusted byJanuary 2016, the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split,officers forgave an aggregate total of $762,275 of accrued payroll due to consultants, allthem from the Company. The Company recorded the forgiveness of which were deemed earned upon issuance for the reporting period ended December 31, 2014 (see Note 14). The fair value of these warrants granted, estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was $1,242, which has been recordedaccrued payroll as consulting expenses.a capital contribution.

F-15
Table of Contents

 

In October 2013, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Tonaquint which included five year warrants for 94 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $260, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, subject to adjustments (see Note 7). Per the terms of the reset feature of the warrants, an additional 1,080 warrant shares were issued at December 31, 2014, for a total of 1,174 warrant shares. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received warrant exercise notices from the warrant holder to convert 110 warrant shares into 323,303 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at exercise prices ranging from $0.039 to $1,053 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In April 2014, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Tonaquint which included five year warrants for 611 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $21.50, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, subject to adjustments (see Note 7). As of December 31, 2014, no warrants have been exercised from this agreement.

In October 2014, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Tonaquint which included five year warrants for 28,320 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $0.46345, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, subject to adjustments (see Note 7). As of December 31, 2014, no warrants have been exercised from this agreement.9 - Warrants

 

The table below summarizes the Company’s warrant activities throughfor the period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2014, as adjusted2016:


 

 

Number of

Warrant Shares

 

 

Exercise Price Range

Per Share

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

Balance, January 1, 2015

 

 

32

 

$

695,000-9,750,000,000

 

 

$25,486,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled

 

(-

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(1)

 

$39.00

 

 

$39.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

 

(1)

 

$

19,500,000- 39,000,000

 

 

$587,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

 

30

 

 

$

695,000- 9,750,000,000

 

 

$10,430,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled

 

(-

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(30)

 

$0.00024

 

 

$8,382,915

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

(-

)

 

$

29,250,000-9,750,000,000

 

 

$29,886,738

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

$-

 

 

$-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested and exercisable, December 31, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

$-

 

 

$-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested, December 31, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

$-

 

 

$-

 

 

In April 2016, the Company executed a settlement agreement with an investor relating to outstanding warrant agreements issued in conjunction with convertible notes that were repaid by the Company in January 2016. Per the terms of the settlement, the investor processed an exercise of 30 warrant shares into 125,000 shares of the Company’s 1:650 reversecommon stock. The investor also received an additional 154,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock split:valued at $185,850, for services (see Note 8).

 

  Number of Warrant
Shares
  Exercise
Price Range Per Share
  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Fair Value at Date of
Issuance
  Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
 
           

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

174

  

$

1,462.50-9,750,000

  

$

47,775

  

$

1,525,791

  

$

-

 
                    

Granted

  

94

  

$

3,900-390,000

  

$

390,000

  

$

61,636

  

$

-

 

Canceled for cashless exercise

  

(-

) 

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 
                    

Exercised (Cashless)

  

(-

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 

Exercised

  

(-

)  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 

Expired

 

(37

)

 

$

14,625-9,750,000

  

$

32,175

  

$

(482,177

)

 

$

-

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

  

231

  

$

1,462.50-9,750,000

  

$

155,025

  

$

1,105,250

  

$

-

 
                    

Granted

  

30,025

  

$

695-312,000

  

$

2,651

  

$

19,949

  

$

-

 

Canceled for cashless exercise

  

(-

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 
                    

Exercised (Cashless)

 

(110

)

 

$

35,159

   

-

  

(8,521

)

  

-

 

Exercised

  

(-

)  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 

Expired

 

(56

)

 

$

19,500-9,750,000

  

$

86,314

  

$

(528,199

)

 

$

-

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

  

30,090

  

$

695-9,750,000

  

$

25,486

  

$

588,479

  

$

-

 
                    

Vested and exercisable, December 31, 2014

  

30,090

  

$

695-9,750,000

  

$

25,486

  

$

588,479

  

$

-

 
                    

Unvested, December 31, 2014

  

-

  

$

-

  

$

-

  

$

-

  

$

-

 

 

F-16
Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable warrants as of December 31, 2014,as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split:

  Warrants Outstanding Warrants Exercisable 

Range of
Exercise Prices

 Number
Outstanding
 Average Remaining Contractual Life
(in years)
 Weighted Average Exercise Price Number
Exercisable
 Average Remaining Contractual Life
(in years)
 Weighted Average Exercise Price 
                    

$9,750,000

  

1

  

0.84

 

$

9,750,000

  

1

  

0.84

 

$

9,750,000

 
                    

$695-312,000

  

30,089

  

1.31

 

$

25,318

  

30,089

  

1.31

 

$

25,318

 
                    

$695 - $9,750,000

  

30,090

  

1.31

 

$

25,486

  

30,090

  

1.31

 

$

25,486

 

Issuance of StockNote 10 - Options to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

 

In January 2013, the Company granted an option to purchase 11 shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, of its common stock to NetLabs, Inc. in exchange for the assignment of the entire right, title and interest in and to the “Out-of-Band Patent”. The Options were valued at $1,636.36 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, or $18,000, which was recorded as Patent.

The Company estimated the fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

January 30,
2013

Expected life (year)

10.00

Expected volatility

142.00

%

Risk-free interest rate

2.03

%

Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends

0.00

%

As of December 31, 2014, options to purchase an aggregate of 13 shares, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, of its common stock for non-employees were outstanding. The exercise price of the options to purchase 2 and 11 shares its common stock is $5,850.00 and $1,636.36, respectively, yielding a weighted average exercise price of $2,925.00, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. In January 2013, options to purchase an aggregate of 1 share of the Company's common stock at $3,510,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, were cancelled per an agreement executed with NetLabs, Inc. Also in January 2013, options to purchase an aggregate of 1 share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, of the Company's common stock, valued at $13,500 per share, expired.


Note 16 - Stock Based Compensation

2004 Equity Incentive Plan

In September 2004,November 2012, the stockholders approved the Equity2012 Stock Incentive Plan effective January 3, 2013. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the Company’s employees (“Incentive Plan”), effective April 1, 2004.plan was 100,000,000. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the Incentive Plan was increased to 10200,000,000 in September 2006, 15 in March 2007, 20 in June 2007, 103 in December 2007 and 205 in April 2011, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split,2016 by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors prior to 2011 and by majority consent of the Board of Directors in 2011.

2012 Stock Option PlanDirectors.

 

In November 2012, the stockholders approved the 2012 Stock Option Plan (“2012 Stock Incentive Plan”) for the Company’s employees, effective January 3, 2013. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan is 103, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split.

Options granted in January 2013

On January 3, 2013,August 2015, the Company grantedawarded options to purchase 51,000,000 shares of its common stock to an unrelated consultant, exercisable at $0.0005 per share.

In September 2016, the Company’sCompany issued options to purchase 196,000,000 shares of its common stock to its management team and employees with an exercise pricea fair value of $1,568,000 determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model. The options are exercisable at $2,242.50$0.00625 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split,vest in 6 months, and expiring in ten (10) years from the date of grant vesting over an eight month period.

Thegrant. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company estimatedrecognized compensation costs of $818,462 based on the fair value of 2013 options on the datethat vested.

The fair value of granteach stock option award was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

Risk-free interest rate

January 3,
2013

0.16%

Expected life (year)dividend yield

10.00

0%

Expected volatility

154.00

%

Risk-free interest rate

78

1.92

%

Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends

0.00life

%

10 years

 


The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of a group of comparable public companies. The expected life of the employee option is estimated by considering the contractual term of the option, the vesting period of the option, and the employees’ expected exercise behavior. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends to its common stockholders in the past and does not expect to pay dividends to its common stockholders in the future.

 

The table below summarizes the Company’s 2004 Incentive Plan and 2012 Stock Incentive Plan activities throughfor the period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2014, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split:2016:

 

  Number of Options
Shares
  Exercise
Price Range Per Share
  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Fair Value at Date of
Issuance
  Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
 
           

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

144

  

$

2,437.50-9,750,000

  

$

13,650

  

$

3,214,621

  

$

-

 
                    

Granted

  

5

  

$

2,242.50

  

$

2,242.50

  

$

10,000

   

-

 

Canceled for cashless exercise

  

(-

 

$

975,000

  

$

2,730,000

  

$

(41,488

)

  

-

 
                    

Exercised (Cashless)

  

(-

)  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 

Exercised

  

(-

)  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 

Expired

 

(5

)

 

$

19,500 – 78,000

  

$

58,500

  

$

(383,480

)

  

-

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

  

144

  

$

2,242.50-9,750,000

  

$

12,646

  

$

2,799,653

  

$

-

 
                    

Granted

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 

Canceled

  

(-

)  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 
                    

Exercised (Cashless)

  

(-

)  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 

Exercised

  

(-

)  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

 

Expired

  

(-

)  

9,750,000

   

9,750,000

  

$

(14,840

)

  

-

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

  

144

  

$

2,242.5-9,750,000

  

$

12,646

  

$

2,784,813

  

$

-

 
                    

Vested and exercisable, December 31, 2014

  

144

  

$

2,242.5-9,750,000

  

$

12,646

  

$

2,784,813

  

$

-

 
                    

Unvested, December 31, 2014

  

-

  

$

-

  

$

-

  

$

-

  

$

-

 

 

 

Number of

Options Shares

 

 

Exercise Price

Range

Per Share

 

 

Weighted

Average Exercise Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, January 1, 2015

 

 

3

 

 

$

2,242,500-9,750,000,000

 

 

$12,650,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

$0.0005

 

 

$0.0005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

 

1,000,003

 

 

$

0.0005-9,750,000,000

 

 

$2.00

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

196,000,000

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(1,000,000)

 

$0.0005

 

 

$0.0005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

 

(2)

 

$9,750,000

 

 

$9,750,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

 

196,000,001

 

 

$

0.0023-975,000,000

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested and exercisable, December 31, 2016

 

 

103,307,693

 

 

$

0.0023-975,000,000

 

 

$0.005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested, December 31, 2016

 

 

92,692,308

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

As of December 31, 2014,2016, options to purchase an aggregate of 142196,000,001 shares of common stock were outstanding under the 2004 incentive plan and 2012 Stock Incentive Plan and there were 1664,000,000 shares remaining available for issuance, as adjusted byissuance. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split. Also in May 2013,intrinsic value of outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 1 share of the Company's common stock, at $975,000 per share and 1 share of the Company's common stock, at $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, were cancelled.was zero.

 

F-17
 

Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes information concerning 2004 Incentive plan and 2012 Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2014,2016:

 

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

 

Options Exercisable

 

Range of
Exercise Prices

 

 

Number
Outstanding

 

 

Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)

 

 

Weighted
Average Exercise
Price

 

 

Number
Exercisable

 

 

Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)

 

 

Weighted
Average Exercise
Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

975,000,000

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1.00

 

 

$975,000,000

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1.00

 

 

$975,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.00625

 

 

 

196,000,000

 

 

 

10.00

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

 

103,307,692

 

 

 

10.00

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.00625 - 975,000,000

 

 

 

196,000,001

 

 

 

10.00

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

 

103,307,693

 

 

 

10.00

 

 

$0.00625

 

Note 11 - Other Income

On March 28, 2013 the Company initiated patent litigation against an outside party. Mediation took place in May 2015 to discuss a potential settlement, and on January 15, 2016, the parties reached a settlement in the matter. As part of the settlement, the Company received a payment in January 2016 of $9,750,000 and incurred fees related to the settlement of $4,187,257.

In 2015 the Company entered into a settlement agreement relating to a lawsuit with a former channel partner and received a total settlement of $305,000.

Note 12- Income Tax Provision

The Company has no tax provision for any period presented due to its history of operating losses. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $6,369,000, resulting from certain temporary differences and net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of approximately $18,732,000, which are available to offset future taxable income, if any, through 2036.  Future tax benefits which may arise as adjusteda result of these losses have not been recognized in these financial statements, as management has determined that their realization is not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carry-forwards.

Components of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

Net deferred tax assets – non-current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards

 

$6,369,000

 

 

$7,552,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less valuation allowance

 

 

(6,369,000)

 

 

(7,552,000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

$-

 

 

$-

 

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income tax provision is as follows:

 

 

For the
year ended December 31,
2016

 

 

For the
year ended December 31,
2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal statutory income tax rate

 

 

34.0%

 

 

34.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards

 

 

(34.0)

 

 

(34.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective income tax rate

 

 

0.0%

 

 

0.0%

F-18
Table of Contents

The Company’s operations are based in New Jersey and it is subject to Federal and New Jersey state income tax. Tax years subsequent to 2009 are open to examination by United States and state tax authorities.

The Company adopted accounting rules which address the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under these rules, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split:taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. These accounting rules also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. As of December 31, 2016, no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required to be recorded.

  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 

Range of
Exercise Prices

 Number
Outstanding
 Average Remaining Contractual Life
(in years)
 Weighted Average Exercise Price Number
Exercisable
 Average Remaining Contractual Life
(in years)
 Weighted Average Exercise Price 
                    

$9,750,000

  

1

  

0.26

 

$

9,750,000

  

1

  

0.26

 

$

9,750,000

 
                    

$975,000

  

1

  

1.51

 

$

975,000

  

1

  

1.51

 

$

975,000

 
                    

$2,437.50-365,625

  

137

  

1.14

 

$

10,935

  

137

  

1.14

 

$

10,935

 
                    

$2,242.50

  

5

  

8.00

 

$

2,242.50

  

5

  

8.00

  

2,242.50

 
                    

$2,242.50-9,750,000

  

144

  

1.38

 

$

12,646

  

144

  

1.38

 

$

12,646

 

 

Note 1713 -Income Tax Provision Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease

The Company leases its office facilities in New Jersey under a non-cancellable lease agreement that expires January 31, 2019. Minimum annual rental commitments under the non-cancelable lease at December 31, 2016 are as follows:

Years ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

2017

 

$50,280

 

2018

 

 

51,729

 

2019

 

 

4,316

 

Total

 

$106,325

 

For the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015, rent expense was $48,548 and $45,680, respectively. 

 

Deferred Tax AssetsAsset Sale and Licensing Agreement

 

As of December 31, 2014,On August 24, 2015, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $6,250,388, resulting from certain temporary differencesentered into an agreement with Cyber Safety, Inc., a New York corporation (“Cyber Safety”) for Cyber Safety to license, and net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of approximately $18,383,494, which are availableretain an option to offset future taxable income, if any, through 2034. As utilization ofpurchase, the net operating loss carry-forwardspatents and temporary difference is not considered more likely than notIntellectual Property related to the GuardedIDÒ and accordingly,MobileTrustÒ software. In conjunction with the deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance.

Deferred tax assets consist primarily oflicensing and the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. Theoption to purchase, Cyber Safety loaned the Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realizability. The valuation allowance increased approximately $558,572$408,000 in 2015 and $578,634 for$75,000 in 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.2016, the note was repaid in full to Cyber Safety (See Note 5).

 

Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:Cyber Safety has the option to buy the Company’s GuardedIDÒ patent for $9,000,000 that expires on September 30, 2020. At December 31, 2016, the Company does not have an estimate if Cyber Safety will exercise its option to make the purchase. Cyber Safety will also resell the Company’s GuardedIDÒ and MobileTrustÒ products, for which the Company will receive a royalty, while the Company retains an unlimited license to resell those products.

 

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 

Net deferred tax assets – non-current:

        
         

Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards

 

$

6,250,388

  

$

5,691,816

 
         

Less valuation allowance

 

(6,250,388

)

 

(5,691,816

)

       

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

$

-

  

$

-

 

As a condition of the asset purchase agreement, Cyber Safety will license the Malware Suite (as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement) up to and until September 30, 2020. Pursuant to this license, Cyber Safety shall pay the Company 15% of the net amount Cyber Safety receives, as defined, which amount may be increased to 20% under certain conditions for ProtectIDÒ, and is subject to reduction for commissions and support costs that Cyber Safety will be obligated to pay to the Company.

 


During 2016, the Company recorded revenue from Advanced Cyber, a subsidiary of Cyber Safety, of $125,000 for support services in conjunction with its agreements with Cyber Safety.

 

Income Tax Provision in the Statements ofOperationsLegal Proceedings

 

A reconciliationOn June 20, 2016, the Company initiated additional patent litigation against three major competitors in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, for infringement of United States Patent No. 8,484,698. This litigation is ongoing. On March 14, 2017, one of the federal statutory income tax rate andparties initiated an inter partes review (IPR) against the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income tax provision is as follows:Company’s second Patent No. 8,484,698.

 

  For the year ended December 31,
2014
  For the year ended December 31,
2013
 
         

Federal statutory income tax rate

  

34.0

%

  

34.0

%

         

Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards

 

(34.0

)

 

(34.0

)

         

Effective income tax rate

  

0.0

%

  

0.0

%

On March 14, 2017, the Company initiated additional patent litigation against two major competitors in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701. This litigation is ongoing.

 

On March 14, 2017, the Company initiated additional patent litigation against two major competitors in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701. This litigation is ongoing.

  

Tax Returns Remaining subjectDue to IRS AuditsFactor

 

The Company’s operations are basedIn March 2007, the Company entered into a sale and subordination agreement with a factoring firm whereby the Company sold its rights to two invoices, from February 2007 and March 2007, totaling $470,200 to the factor. Upon signing the agreement and providing the required disclosures, the factor remitted $197,450 to the Company. By December 31, 2007, the two invoices were deemed uncollectible. In February 2008, the Company agreed to pay the factor a settlement of $75,000 in New Jersey and it is subjectSeptember 2008, unless both parties mutually agreed to federal and New Jersey state income tax. Tax years subsequent to 2007 are open to examination by United States and state tax authorities.

Note 18 - Concentration of Credit Risk

Customers and Credit Concentrations

Revenue concentrationsextend the due date. In September 2008, the Company and the accounts receivables concentrations are as follows:

  

Net Sales

for the Year Ended

  

Accounts
Receivable
at

 
  

December 31,

2014

  

December 31,

2013

  

December 31,

 2014

  

December 31,

 2013

 
             

Customer A

 

45.4

%

 

25.3

%

 

35.9

%

 

25.9

%

                 

Customer B

  

23.4

%

  

-

%

 

 

41.2

%

  

-

%

                 

Customer C

  

-

%  

28.8

%  

-

%  

-

%
                 

Customer D

  

-

%  

-

%  

11.7

%  

-

%
                 

Customer E

  

-

%  

22.6

%  

-

%  

-

%
                 
   

68.8

%  

76.7

%  

88.8

%  

25.9

%

A reduction in sales from or lossfactor reached a verbal agreement to extend the due date to December 31, 2008. The Company is currently pursuing a further extension. As of such customers would have a material adverse effect onDecember 31, 2016, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.balance due to the factor was $209,192 including interest.


 

Note 19 -14 – Subsequent Events

 

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued. The Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:

Convertible Notes Payable

In February 2015, the Company issued a convertible noteSubscription agreements for $25,000, bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing on February 25, 2016 with Vista. The debenture contains an embedded derivative feature.

In February 2015, the Company issued a convertible note for $42,000, as a back-end note dating from July 7, 2014, net of legal fees of $2,000 for a total amount received of $40,000, bearing interest at 10% per annum, maturing on July 7, 2015 with LG Capital. The debenture contains an embedded derivative feature.

Note Payable - Related Party

In January 2015, the Company issued a promissory note for $19,875, non-interest bearing, maturing on January 9, 2017 with its CEO.

Debt Purchase Agreement

In February 2015, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a debt purchase agreement formalized among the Company, a promissory note holder and Black Arch, the Company transferred $25,000 of the note balance to Black Arch in the form of a convertible note for $25,000, bearing interest at 10% per annum, with a maturity date of February 17, 2016. The new debenture contains an embedded derivative feature.

Conversions to CommonSeries B Preferred Stock

 

In January 2015,2017, the Company received conversion notices from Adar Bayssold subscriptions to convert $11,110two individuals for the purchase of a note dated March 24, 2014,53,334 shares of its Series B Preferred Stock at $1.50 per share, or an aggregate of $80,000. The shares of Series B Preferred Stock are convertible into 294,695 unrestricted shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a 25% discount to current market value, as defined, with a minimum conversion price set by the Company's Board of $0.0377Directors of $0.001 per share, as adjustedshare. The Series B Preferred Stock can be converted at any time into shares of common stock after twelve months from acceptance by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In January 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from Auctus to convert $1,727, and accrued interest of $103, of a note dated May 21, 2014, into 93,833 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.0195 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).subscription agreements, but only once every 30 days.

 

In January 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from JMJ to convert $4,974 of a note dated March 26, 2014, into 127,538 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.039 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In January 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from JSJ to convert $3,308 of a note dated May 25, 2014, into 125,369 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.02665 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

 

F-19

In January 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from LG Capital to convert $4,400 of a note, and accrued interest of $362, dated March 14, 2014, into 126,303 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In January 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from Union to convert $4,490, and accrued interest of $121, of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on September 23, 2006, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 122,296 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In January 2015, the Company received conversion notices from WHC to convert $8,720 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on January 23, 2009, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 233,889 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at conversion prices ranging from $0.036946 to $0.0377 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In February 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from Adar Bays to convert $1,285 of a note dated March 24, 2014, into 221,552 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.0058 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In February 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from Auctus to convert $806, and accrued interest of $322, of a note dated May 21, 2014, into 188,000 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.006 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In February 2015, the Company received conversion notices from Black Arch to convert $4,720 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on February 11, 2008, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 536,667 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at conversion prices ranging from $0.006 to $0.015 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 19 above).

In February 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from JMJ to convert $810 of a note dated March 26, 2014, into 225,000 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.0036 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In February 2015, the Company received conversion notices from KBM to convert $3,470 of a note dated April 8, 2014, into 598,275 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.0058 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In February 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from LG Capital to convert $1,135 of a note, and accrued interest of $107, dated March 14, 2014, into 214,132 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.0058 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In February 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from WHC to convert $893 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on January 23, 2009, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 256,668 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.00348 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In March 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from Adar Bays to convert $1,030 of a note dated March 24, 2014, into 572,859 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.001798 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

 

Table of Contents

In March 2015, the Company received conversion notices from Auctus to convert $3,069, and accrued interest of $406, of a note dated May 21, 2014, into 2,040,925 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at conversion prices ranging from $0.00066 to $0.00435 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In March 2015, the Company received conversion notices from Black Arch to convert $4,458 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on February 11, 2008, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 2,820,000 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at conversion prices ranging from $0.00066 to $0.0042 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 19 above).

In March 2015, the Company received conversion notices from Iconic to convert $6,739 of a note dated May 30, 2014, into 2,421,422 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0015 to $0.0039 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In March 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from JMJ to convert $945 of a note dated March 26, 2014, into 630,000 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.0015 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In March 2015, the Company received conversion notices from KBM to convert $5,360 of a note dated April 8, 2014, into 3,464,736 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at conversion prices ranging from $0.00064 to $0.0052 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In March 2015, the Company received conversion notices from Vista to convert $2,990 of a note dated April 1, 2014, into 2,540,000 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at conversion prices ranging from $0.0004 to $0.00275 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In March 2015, the Company received conversion notices from WHC to convert $1,300 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on January 23, 2009, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 1,334,895 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at conversion prices ranging from $0.000638 to $0.00145 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In April 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from Auctus to convert $643, and accrued interest of $75, of a note dated May 21, 2014, into 1,088,258 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.006 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In April 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from Black Arch to convert $1,386 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on February 11, 2008, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 2,100,000 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.00066 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 19 above).

In April 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from Iconic to convert $1,253 of a note dated May 30, 2014, into 2,610,417 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.00048 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

In April 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from JMJ to convert $521 of a note dated March 26, 2014, into 1,085,000 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.00048 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).


In April 2015, the Company received a conversion notice from WHC to convert $636 of a note originally issued to a non-related third party on January 23, 2009, and sold to the investor firm with no additional consideration to the Company, into 1,371,639 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, at a conversion price of $0.00046 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split (see Note 7).

Cashless Exercise of Warrants

In January 2015, the Company received a warrant exercise notice from Tonaquint to convert 12 warrant shares, of Tonaquint Warrants #1, into 191,373 unrestricted shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $0.039 per share, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split (see Notes 7 and 15).

Common Stock

In March 2015, the Company's transfer agent issued 1,427 shares of the Company's common stock, as adjusted by the Company’s 1:650 reverse stock split, valued at $4.71, as rounding shares related to the Company's 1:650 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock that was adopted in January 2015 (see Note 15).

Issuance of Common Stock for Services

In March 2015, the Company issued a total of 7,500 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $18.75, which has been expensed as legal fees, related to a retainer agreement with the Company's attorney (see Note 14).


 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

We have no disclosure required by this Item.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

 

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

We carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the effectiveness our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2014.2016. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the following material weaknesses described below.weaknesses:

 

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) as of December 31, 2014. Management is required to base its assessment of the effectiveness1. We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting onis a suitable, recognized control framework, such as the framework developed by the Committeerequirement of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO). The COSO framework, published in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, is known as the COSO Report. Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have chosen the COSO framework on which to base their assessment.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectivesSection 404 of the system are met. In addition, the designSarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us as of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.


A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2) or combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management has identified the following three material weaknesses which have caused management to conclude that, as ofyear ending December 31, 2014,2016. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective atand has concluded that the reasonable assurance level:control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

 

1.

We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2.

Our board of directors has no audit committee, independent director or member with financial expertise which causes ineffective oversight of our external financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting.

3.

2. Our board of directors has no independent director or member with financial expertise which causes ineffective oversight of our external financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting.

3. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

 

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

 

Remediation of Material Weaknesses

 

We intend to remediate the material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures identified above by adding an independent director or member with financial expertise or hiring a full-time CFO with SEC reporting experience in the future when working capital permits and by working with our independent registered public accounting firm to refine our internal procedures. To date, we have not been successful in reducing the number of audit adjustments, but will continue our efforts in the coming fiscal year.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

None

 

 

26
Table of Contents

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

 

The following sets forth our executive officers and/or Directors, their ages, and all offices and positions held with us.

 

Name

Age

Age

Position

Mark L. Kay

68

66

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors

Philip E. Blocker

60

58

Chief Financial Officer

Ramarao Pemmaraju

56

54

Chief Technical Officer and Director

George Waller

59

57

Executive Vice President and Marketing Director

 

Our Directors hold their offices until the next annual meeting of the our shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, removal of office or death. Our executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors to serve until their successors are elected and qualified.

 

The following is a brief description of the business experience of our executive officers who are also the Directors and significant employees:

 

Mark L. Kay, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

Mr. Kay joined StrikeForce as our CEO in May 2003 following his retirement at JPMorganChase & Co. In December 2008, a majority of the Board of Directors, by written consent, eliminated the position of our President, with those responsibilities being assumed by Mr. Kay. A majority of the Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Kay as the Chairman of the Board in December 2008. Prior to joining StrikeForce Mr. Kay was employed by JPMorganChase & Co. from August of 1977 until his retirement in December 2002, at which time he was a Managing Director of the firm. During his tenure with JPMorganChase & Co. Mr. Kay led strategic and corporate business groups with global teams up to approximately 1,000 people. His responsibilities also included Chief Operations Officer, Chief Information Officer, and Global Technology Auditor. Mr. Kay’s business concentrations were in securities (fixed income and equities), proprietary trading and treasury, global custody services, audit, cash management, corporate business services and web services. Prior to his employment with JPMorganChase & Co., Mr. Kay was a systems engineer at Electronic Data Services (EDS) for approximately five years from September 1972 through to August 1977. He holds a B.A. in Mathematics from CUNY.

 

Philip E. Blocker, Chief Financial Officer

 

Mr. Blocker was CFO of MediaServ, a NYC based Internet software development company, in 2001. Prior to MediaServ, Mr. Blocker was a partner in POLARIS, a $25 million technology reseller, specializing in storage and high availability solutions. He is a Certified Public Accountant and has practical experience with taking private companies public.

 

Ramarao Pemmaraju, Chief Technology Officer

 

Mr. Pemmaraju Joined StrikeForce in July 2002 as our Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and the inventor of the ProtectID®ProtectIDÒ product. In May 1999 Mr. Pemmaraju co-founded NetLabs, which developed security software products. Mr. Pemmaraju concentrated his time on NetLabs from July 2001 through to July 2002. From June 2000 to July 2001 Mr. Pemmaraju was a systems architect and project leader for Coreon, an operations service provider in telecommunications. From October 1998 through May 2000, Mr. Pemmaraju was a systems engineer with Nexgen systems, an engineering consulting firm. Mr. Pemmaraju has over eighteen yearsyears’ experience in systems engineering and telecommunications. His specific expertise is in systems architecture, design and product development. Mr. Pemmaraju holds a M.S.E.E. from Rutgers University and a B.E. from Stevens Tech.

 

George Waller, Executive Vice President and Head of Marketing

 

Mr. Waller joined StrikeForce in June 2002 as a Vice President in charge of sales and marketing. In July 2002, Mr. Waller became the CEO of StrikeForce, a position he held until Mr. Kay joined us in May 2003. Since May 2003, Mr. Waller has been the Executive Vice President overseeing Sales, Marketing, Business Development and product development. From 2000 through June 2002, Mr. Waller was Vice President of business development for Infopro, an outsourcing software development firm. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Waller was Vice President of sales and Marketing for Teachmeit.com-Incubation systems, Inc., a multifaceted computer company and sister company to Infopro. From 1997 through 1999, Mr. Waller was the Vice President of Internet Marketing for RX Remedy, an aggregator of medical content for online services. Previously, Mr. Waller was a Vice President of Connexus Corporation, a software integrator.

 

 

27
Table of Contents

   

Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships between any two or more of our directors or executive officers. There is no arrangement or understanding between any of our directors or executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or officer, and there is no arrangement, plan or understanding as to whether non-management shareholders will exercise their voting rights to continue to elect the current board of directors. There are also no arrangements, agreements or understandings to our knowledge between non-management shareholders that may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

To the best of our knowledge, during the past five years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director or executive officer of our Company: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of any competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the commodities futures trading commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

 

Board of Directors

 

Our By-laws provide that there must be no less than one and no more than seven directors, as determined by the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently consists of three directors.

 

Directors need not be our stockholders or residents of the State of Wyoming. Directors are elected for an annual term and generally hold office until the next Directors have been duly elected and qualified. A vacancy on the Board may be filled by the remaining Directors even though less than a quorum remains. A Director appointed to fill a vacancy remains a Director until his successor is elected by the Stockholders at the next annual meeting of Shareholder or until a special meeting is called to elect Directors.

 

Our executive officers are appointed by the Board of Directors.

 

During fiscal 2014,2016, our Board of Directors met twenty four times. The Board of Directors also uses written resolutions to deal with certain matters and, during fiscal 2014 twenty-seven2016 eighteen written resolutions were signed by a majority of the Directors.

 

Compensation of Directors

 

Our bylaws provide that, unless otherwise restricted by our certificate of incorporation, our Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. The directors may be paid their expenses, if any, related to attendance at each meeting of the board of directors and may be paid a fixed sum for attendance at each meeting of the board of directors or a stated salary as our director. Our bylaws further provide that no such payment will preclude any director from serving our company in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefore. Further, members of special or standing committees may be given compensation for attending committee meetings.

 

Committees

 

We have two committees: the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. At this time, there are no members of either Committee and the Board of Directors performs the acts of the Committees. None of our current directors are deemed “independent” directors as that term is used by the national stock exchanges or have the requisite public company accounting background or expertise to be considered an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 
28
Table of Contents

It is anticipated that the principal functions of the Audit Committee will be to recommend the annual appointment of our auditors, the scope of the audit and the results of their examination, to review and approve any material accounting policy changes affecting our operating results and to review our internal control procedures.


 

It is anticipated that the Compensation Committee will develop a Company-wide program covering all employees and that the goals of such program will be to attract, maintain, and motivate our employees. It is further anticipated that one of the aspects of the program will be to link an employee’s compensation to his or her performance, and that the grant of stock options or other awards related to the price of the common shares will be used in order to make an employee’s compensation consistent with shareholders’ gains. It is expected that salaries will be set competitively relative to the technology development industry and that individual experience and performance will be considered in setting salaries.

 

At present, executive and director compensation matters are determined by a majority vote of the board of directors.

 

We do not have a nominating committee. Historically our entire Board has selected nominees for election as directors. The Board believes this process has worked well thus far particularly since it has been the Board's practice to require unanimity of Board members with respect to the selection of director nominees. In determining whether to elect a director or to nominate any person for election by our stockholders, the Board assesses the appropriate size of the Board of Directors, consistent with our bylaws, and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. If vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Board will consider various potential candidates to fill each vacancy. Candidates may come to the attention of the Board through a variety of sources, including from current members of the Board, stockholders, or other persons. The Board of Directors has not yet had the occasion to, but will, consider properly submitted proposed nominations by stockholders who are not our directors, officers, or employees on the same basis as candidates proposed by any other person.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of our outstanding Common Stock, or the Reporting Persons, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock on Forms 4 or 5. Such persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all such reports they file. Based solely on a review of Forms 3 and 4 furnished to us by the Reporting Persons or prepared on behalf of the Reporting Persons by the Company, the Company believes that the Reporting Persons have not complied with reporting requirements applicable to them.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of the following events have occurred during the past ten years and are material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of any director or officer of the Company:

1.A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

2.Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3.Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:


a.Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

b.Engaging in any type of business practice; or

c.Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;


4.Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

5.Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

29
Table of Contents

6.Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

7.Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:


a.Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

b.Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

c.Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or


8.Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29)), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Code of Ethics.

 

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our code of ethics contains standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

 

·

o

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

·

o

Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submits to, the Commission and in other public communications made by us;

·

o

Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

·

o

The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to the board of directors or another appropriate person or persons; and

·

o

Accountability for adherence to the code.

 

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

 

As permitted by Wyoming law, our Articles of Incorporation provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers against expenses and liabilities they incur to defend, settle, or satisfy any civil or criminal action brought against them on account of their being or having been our directors or officers unless, in any such action, they are adjudged to have acted with gross negligence or willful misconduct.

 

Pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in that Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

 


Stockholder Communications with the Board

 

Stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board of Directors should send their communications to the Chairman of the Board at the address listed below. The Chairman of the Board is responsible for forwarding communications to the appropriate Board members.

 

StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.

1090 King George’s Post Road

Suite #603

Edison, NJ 08837

Attn: Mark L. Kay, Chairman

30
Table of Contents

Shareholder Recommendations for Board Nominees

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth certain compensation information for: (i) the person who served as the Chief Executive Officer of StrikeForce during the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, regardless of the compensation level, and (ii) each of our other executive officers, serving as an executive officer at any time during 20142016 and 2013.2015. The foregoing persons are collectively referred to in this Form 10-K as the “Named Executive Officers.” Compensation information is shown for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013:2015:

 

 

   Salary  Bonus  Stock Awards  Incentive Plan Option Awards  Securities Underlying Options/SARs  Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings  All Other Compensation  Total 

Name/ Principal Position

 Year  

($)

  

($)

  

($)

  

($)

  

($)

  

($)

  

($)

  

($)

 

 

 

 

Mark L. Kay

 2014  

98,000

                    

98,000

 

Chief Executive Officer

2013

   

98,000

  

-

  

2,000

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

   

100,000

 
                                   

George Waller

 

2014

   

98,000

                     

98,00

 

Executive Vice President

 

2013

   

98,000

   

-

   

2,000

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

100,000

 
                                   

Ramarao Pemmaraju

2014

   

98,000

   

 

                  

98,000

 

Chief Technical Officer

 

2013

   

98,000

   

-

   

2,000

   

-

   

-

   -   

-

   

100,000

 

Name/

Principal

Position

 

Year

 

Salary
($)

 

Bonus
($)

 

Stock

Awards

($)

 

Incentive Plan Option Awards (Vested)

($)

 

Securities Underlying Options/SARs

($)

 

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

 

All Other

Compensation
($)

 

Total
($)

 

Mark L. Kay

 

Chief Executive

 

2016

 

146,000

 

5,769

 

-

 

150,330

 

-

 

-

 

89,182

 

391,281

 

Officer

 

2015

 

101,231

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

101,231

 

 

George Waller

 

Executive

 

2016

 

146,000

 

5,769

 

-

 

150,330

 

-

 

-

 

77,086

 

379,185

 

Vice President

 

2015

 

105,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

105,000

 

 

Ramarao

 

Pemmeraju

 

Chief Technology

 

2016

 

146,000

 

5,769

 

150,330

 

-

 

-

 

65,572

 

367,671

 

Officer

 

2015

 

105,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

105,000

Effective January 25, 2016, the Board of Directors determined to increase the base salaries of our officers and employees, including our named executive officers, such that the new salaries are comparable to similarly situated companies. Consequently, the base salaries of Mark Kay, George Waller, and Ramarao Pemmaraju have been set at $150,000 per annum. Other employees were granted increases to between $105,000 and $125,000 per annum. Additionally, in January 2016, our officers received an aggregate total of $231,840 of accrued payroll and forgave an aggregate total of $762,275 of accrued payroll, from prior years' missed salaries, that we owed to them. We recorded the officers’ forgiveness of accrued payroll as a capital contribution in January 2016.

 

On July 31, 2010, Philip E. Blocker was appointed our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Blocker is not our employee and he received no payments or option awards in 2014.2016 or 2015.

31
Table of Contents

  

Outstanding Option Awards at Year End

 

The following table provides certain information regarding unexercised options to purchase common stock, stock options that have not vested, and equity-incentive plan awards outstanding at December 31, 2014, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split,2016 for each Named Executive Officer and/or Director.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End Table

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

(#)

Exercisable

 

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

(#)

Unexercisable

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)

 

 

Option Exercise Price ($)

 

 

Option Expiration Date

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)

 

 

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)

 

Mark L. Kay

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$365,265,000

 

 

03/02/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$234,000,000

 

 

03/16/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$224,250,000

 

 

04/27/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$195,000,000

 

 

05/25/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$146,250,000

 

 

06/08/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$165,750,000

 

 

06/22/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$78,000,000

 

 

11/23/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$300,000.00

 

 

12/12/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$2,242,500

 

 

01/03/23

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

18,791,209

 

 

 

17,208,791

 

 

 

-

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

09/28/26

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Waller

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$146,250,000

 

 

06/08/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$165,750,000

 

 

06/22/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$78,000,000

 

 

11/23/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$195,000,000

 

 

12/12/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$2,242,500

 

 

01/03/23

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

18,791,209

 

 

 

17,208,791

 

 

 

-

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

09/28/26

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ramarao Pemmaraju

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$195,000,000

 

 

05/25/17

 

 

- -

 

 

 

- -

 

 

 

- -

 

 

 

- -

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

146,250,000

 

 

06/08/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$165,750,000

 

 

06/22/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$78,000,000

 

 

11/23/17

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$5,850,000

 

 

12/23/15

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$2,242,500

 

 

01/03/23

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

18,791,209

 

 

 

17,208,791

 

 

 

-

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

09/28/26

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

32
Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End Table

 

 Option Awards Stock Awards 

Name

  

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

(#)

Exercisable

  

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

(#)

Unexercisable

  

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)

 Option Exercise Price ($)  

Option Expiration Date

  

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)

  

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)

  

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)

  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) 

Mark L. Kay

 

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

365,265

 

03/02/17

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 
  1  

-

  

-

 

$

234,000

 

03/16/17

  

-

  -  -  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

224,250

 

04/27/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

195,000

 

05/25/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

146,250

 

06/08/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

165,750

 

06/22/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

3

  

-

  

-

 

$

78,000

 

11/23/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

300.00

 

12/12/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

8,287.50

 

07/01/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

11

  

-

  

-

 

$

2,437.50

 

12/21/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

3

  

-

  

-

 

$

5,850.00

 

12/23/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

16

  

-

  

-

 

$

9,750.00

 

04/21/16

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

2,242.50

 

01/03/23

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

George Waller

  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

146,250

 

06/08/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 

 

  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

165,750

 

06/22/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

78,000

 

11/23/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

195,000

 

12/12/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

8,287.50

 

07/01/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

11

  

-

  

-

 

$

2,437.50

 

12/21/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

3

  

-

  

-

 

$

5,850.00

 

12/23/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

16

  

-

  

-

 

$

9,750.00

 

04/21/16

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

2,242.50

 

01/03/23

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ramarao Pemmaraju

  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

195,000

 

05/25/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 

 

  

7

  

-

  

-

 

$

146,250

 

06/08/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

165,750

 

06/22/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

78,000

 

11/23/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

195,000

 

12/12/17

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

8,287.50

 

07/01/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

11

  

-

  

-

 

$

2,437.50

 

12/21/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

3

  

-

  

-

 

$

5,850.00

 

12/23/15

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

16

  

-

  

-

 

$

9,750.00

 

04/21/16

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 
  

1

  

-

  

-

 

$

2,242.50

 

01/03/23

  

-

  

-

  

-

  

-

 

  

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

 

None.

 

Pension Benefits Table

 

None.

 


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

 

Name

Executive Contributions

in Last Fiscal Year

($)

Registrant

Contributions in Last

Fiscal Year

($)

Aggregate Earnings

in Last Fiscal Year

($)

Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year
($)

Aggregate

Withdrawals /

Distributions

($)

Aggregate Balance at

Last Fiscal Year-End

($)

Mark L. Kay

-

-

-

-

-

-

334,985

-

-

-

George Waller

-

-

-

-

-

-

331,654

-

-

-

Ramarao Pemmaraju

-

-

-

-

-

-

335,216

-

-

-

 

All Other Compensation Table

 

None.

 

Perquisites Table

 

None.

 

Director Compensation

 

All three of our directors were also our executive officers through December 31, 2014.2015. Our directors did not receive any separate compensation for serving as such during fiscal 2014.2016.

 

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

 

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2014,2016, with respect to the shares of common stock beneficially owned by: (i) each director; (ii) each executive officer; (iii) all current executive officers (regardless of salary and bonus level) and directors as a group; and (iv) each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.stock. The address for each director and executive officer is 1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite 603, Edison, New Jersey 08837. Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed in the table below have sole voting and investment powers with respect to the shares indicated:

 
33
Table of Contents

This table is based upon information obtained from our stock records.

 

NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER

AMOUNT OF OWNERSHIP(1)PERCENTAGE OF CLASS
(2) (excluding Preferred Stock) (11)

Mark L. Kay

35 (3),(11

)

0.0012

%

Ramarao Pemmaraju

 45 (4),(5),(11

)

0.0015

%

George Waller

 32 (6),(7),(11

)

0.0011

%

All directors and executive officers as a group (3 persons)

112 (8

)

0.0038

%

NetLabs.com, Inc.

 11 (9),(10

)

0.0004

%

NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER

 

AMOUNT OF OWNERSHIP(1)

 

 

PERCENTAGE OF CLASS(2) (excluding Preferred Stock (11))

 

Mark L. Kay

 

 

18,791,217(3),(11)

 

 

0.7370%

Ramarao Pemmaraju

 

 

30,274,732(4),(5),(11)

 

 

1.1874%

George Waller

 

 

18,791,211(6),(7),(11)

 

 

0.7370%

All directors and executive officers as a group (3 persons)

 

 

67,857,160(8)

 

 

2.6615%

NetLabs.com, Inc.

 

 

2(9),(10)

 

 

0.00000008%

_______________________________

(1)

A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within 90 days from the date hereof.

 


(2)

Based on 2,453,5222,319,683,886 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2014;2016; also including 551,48825 shares of common stock available upon the conversion of certain convertible loans, 15533,876,016 shares of common stock available upon the conversion of Series B Preferred stock and 196,000,001 shares of common stock underlying options and 30,090 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.options.

 

(3)

Includes 1 share6 shares of common stock available upon the conversion of certain convertible loans valued at $9,750,000$9,750,000,000 per share for $240,000 of convertibles and $7,312,500$7,312,500,000 per share for $28,000 of convertibles, 31 shares of common stock underlying vested five-year options valued from $2,242.50 to $9,750 per share, 1 share of common stock underlying vested ten-year options valued from $78,000 to $365,625at $2,242,500 per share and 1 share18,791,209 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants, exercisablevested ten-year options valued at $9,750,000, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.$0.00625 per share. Mark L. Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller each hold one share of Series A Preferred Shares which, collectively, allow the holders to vote up to 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of common and preferred stock; Mark Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller have irrevocably waived any conversion rights.

 

(4)

Includes 1 share4 shares of common stock available upon the conversion of certain convertible loans valued at $9,750,000$9,750,000,000 per share for $25,000 of convertibles and $7,312,500$7,312,500,000 per share for $5,000 of convertibles 412 shares of common stock underlying vested five-year options valued from $2,242.50 to $9,750 per share, 1 share of common stock underlying vested ten-year options valued from $78,000 to $195,000at $2,242,500 per share and 1 share30,274,727 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants, exercisablevested ten-year options valued at $9,750,000, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.$0.00625 per share. Of the total shares, 1311,483,521 shares, consisting of 1 share4 shares of common stock available upon the conversion of certain convertible loans valued at $9,750,000$9,750,000,000 per share for $25,000 of convertibles and $7,312,500$7,312,500,000 per share for $5,000 of convertibles, 11 shares of common stock underlying vested five-year options valued from $2,242.50 to $9,750 per share, 1 share of common stock underlying vested ten-year options valued from $78,000 to $195,000at $2,242,500 per share and 1 share11,483,516 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants, exercisablevested ten-year options valued at $9,750,000, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split$0.00625 per share, are in the name of Sunita Pemmaraju who is a family member of Ramarao Pemmaraju. Mark L. Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller each hold one share of Series A Preferred Shares which, collectively, allow the holders to vote up to 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock; Mark Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller have irrevocably waived any conversion rights.

(5)

Excludes shares owned by NetLabs.com, Inc. which is controlled by Ramarao Pemmaraju and another individual.

 

 

(6)

Shares are listed in the name of Katherine LaRosa who is a family member of George Waller.

 

(7)

Includes 31 shares of common stock underlying vested five-year options valued from $2,242.50 to $9,750 per share and 1 share of common stock underlying vested ten-year options valued from $78,000 to $195,000at $2,242,500 per share as adjusted by our1:650 reverseand 18,791,209 shares of common stock split.underlying vested ten-year options valued at $0.00625 per share. Mark Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller each hold one share of Series A Preferred Shares which, collectively, allow the holders to vote up to 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock; Mark Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller have irrevocably waived any conversion rights.

 

(8)

Includes 210 shares of common stock available upon the conversion of certain convertible loans valued at $9,750,000$9,750,000,000 per share for $265,000 of convertibles and $7,312,500$7,312,500,000 per share for $33,000 of convertibles, 103 shares of common stock underlying vested five-year options valued from $2,242.50 to $9,750,000 per share, 34 shares of common stock underlying vested ten-year options valued from $78,000 to $195,000at $2,242,500 per share and 267,857,143 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants, exercisablevested ten-year options valued at $9,750,000, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.$0.00625 per share. Excludes the Series A Preferred Shares: Mark L. Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller, each hold one share of Series A Preferred Shares which, collectively, allow the holders to vote up to 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock; Mark Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller, have irrevocably waived any conversion rights.

 

(9)

Ramarao Pemmaraju controls NetLabs.com, Inc. along with another individual.

 

(10)

Includes 10 shares1 share of common stock underlying vested ten-year options valued at $1,950$1,950,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.share.

 

(11)

Mark Kay, along with Ramarao Pemmaraju and George Waller hold 3 shares of preferred stock. The Series A Preferred Stock collectively has voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total current issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

 

34
Table of Contents

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

 

Equity Incentive Plan Information

 

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2014,2016, the total number of shares of our common stock which may be issued upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and other rights under compensation plans approved by the shareholders, and under compensation plans not approved by the shareholders, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.shareholders. The table also sets forth the weighted average purchase price per share of the shares subject to those options, and the number of shares available for future issuance under those plans.

 

Plan Category

 Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 

 

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options

 

 

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options

 

 

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

144

  

$

12,646.00

  

166

 

 

196,000,001

 

$0.00625

 

4,000,000

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  

N/A

 

$

N/A

  

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

$N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

Total

  

144

  

$

12,646.00

   

166

 

 

 

196,000,001

 

 

$0.00625

 

 

 

4,000,000

 

 

Options for 137 shares, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split,an aggregate of one share have been granted under StrikeForce’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan which was approved by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors. The option shares were originally granted at various times from May 2003March 2007 through December 20112007 and are exercisable at a range of 2,437.50$78,000,000 to $9,375,000$365,625,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. In August 2008, twelve employees voluntarily surrendered for cancellation 12 options to purchase common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. Such surrender did not require any accounting recognition by us.share. 

 

2012 Stock Option Plan

 

In November 2012, ourthe stockholders approved the 2012 Stock Option Plan for our employees, effective January 3, 2013. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan is 103, as adjusted100,000,000.

The number of shares authorized for issuance under the Incentive Plan was increased to 200,000,000 in September 2016 by our 1:650 reverse stock split.unanimous consent of the Board of Directors.  

 

In January 2013,August 2015, we awarded options to purchase an aggregate of 71,000,000 shares of our common stock as adjusted byto an unrelated consultant, exercisable at $0.0005 per share, expiring two years from the date of grant, and vesting over a four month period. In December 2016, the consultant processed an exercise of 1,000,000 stock option shares into 1,000,000 shares of our 1:650 reversecommon stock, split, to our employees out of the 2012 Stock Option Plan. The three (3) officersvalued at $4,000, for a $500 payment, received in January 2017.  

In September 2016, we awarded options to purchase an aggregate196,000,000 shares of 1our common share eachstock to our management team and the remaining staff received options to purchase an aggregate of 1 commonemployees, exercisable at $0.00625 per share, each, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The exercise price of the option shares is $2,242.50 expiring ten (10) years from the date of issuance, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split.grant and vesting over a six-month period. 

35
Table of Contents

 

General

 

Common Stock

 

The shares of our common stock presently outstanding, and any shares of our common stock issues upon exercise of stock options and/or common stock purchase warrants, will be fully paid and non-assessable. Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share owned on all matters voted upon by shareholders, and a majority vote is required for all actions to be taken by shareholders. In the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind-up our operations, the holders of the common stock are entitled to share equally and ratably in our assets, if any, remaining after the payment of all our debts and liabilities and the liquidation preference of any shares of preferred stock that may then be outstanding. The common stock has no preemptive rights, no cumulative voting rights, and no redemption, sinking fund, or conversion provisions. Since the holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares can elect all of our Directors, and the holders of the remaining shares by themselves cannot elect any Directors. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if and when declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for such purpose, subject to the dividend and liquidation rights of any preferred stock that may then be outstanding.

 

InOn March 18, 2014, we effected a 1:1,500 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. On February 2011, an increase13, 2015, we effected a 1:650 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. On August 4, 2015, we effected a 1:1,000 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the reverse stock splits adopted by us as if the reverse had occurred at the beginning of the authorized shares of our common stock from one hundred million (100,000,000) to five hundred million (500,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State.earliest period presented.

 

In December 2012, an increase of the authorized shares of our common stock from five hundred million (500,000,000) to seven hundred fifty million (750,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to the our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in February 2013.

In May 2013, an increase of the authorized shares of our common stock from seven hundred fifty million (750,000,000) to one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in May 2013.


In July 2013, an increase of the authorized shares of our common stock from one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000) to three billion (3,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in July 2013.

In August 2013,June 2015, an increase of the authorized shares of our common stock from three billion (3,000,000,000) to five billion (5,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in September 2013.

In December 2013, an increase of the authorized shares of our common stock from five billion (5,000,000,000) to six billion seven hundred fifty million (6,750,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in January 2014.

In February 2014, a 1:1,500 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in March 2014.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the 1:1,500 reverse stock split adopted in March 2014.

In February 2014, a decrease of the authorized shares of our common stock from six billion seven hundred fifty million (6,750,000,000) to one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in March 2014.

In December 2014, an increase of the authorized shares of our common stock from one billion, five hundred million (1,500,000,000) to nine billion (9,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in December 2014.

In December 2014, a 1:650 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in JanuaryJuly 2015.

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the 1:650 reverse stock split adopted in January 2015.

In December 2014, a decrease of the authorized shares of our common stock from nine billion (9,000,000,000) to three billion (3,000,000,000), $0.0001 par value, was ratified, effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Wyoming Secretary of State. The amendment was adopted in January 2015.

 

Preferred Stock

 

On October 21, 2010, we amended our Articles of Incorporation in New Jersey to authorize 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.10. The designations, rights, and preferences of such preferred stock are to be determined by the Board of Directors. On November 15, 2010, we changed our domicile from the state of New Jersey to the state of Wyoming.

 

In addition to the 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, on January 10, 2011, 100 shares of preferred stock were designated as Series A Preferred Stock and 100,000,000 shares were designated as Series B Preferred Stock. The bylaws under the Wyoming Incorporation were amended to reflect the rights and preferences of each additional new designation.

 

The Series A Preferred Stock collectively has voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total current issued and outstanding shares of common stock. If at least one share of Series A Preferred Stock is outstanding, the aggregate shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall have voting rights equal to the number of shares of common stock equal to four times the sum of the total number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding, plus the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock (or other designated preferred stock) which are issued and outstanding.

 


In February 2011, we issued three shares of non-convertible Series A preferred stock valued at $329,000 per share, or $987,000 in aggregate, for voting purposes only, to the three members of our management team at one share each. The issued and outstanding shares of the Series A preferred stock have voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total issued and outstanding shares of the our common stock. This effectively provided them, upon retention of their Series A Preferred Stock, voting control on matters presented to our shareholders. They have each irrevocably waived their conversion rights relating to the Series A preferred shares issued.

 

36
Table of Contents

The Series B Preferred Stock shall have preferential liquidation rights in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, such liquidation rights to be paid from our assets not delegated to parties with greater priority at $1.00 per share or, in the event an aggregate subscription by a single subscriber of the Series B Preferred Stock is greater than $100,000,000, $0.997 per share. The Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible to a number of shares of common stock equal to the price of the Series B Preferred Stock divided by the par value of the Series B Preferred Stock, par value $0.10. The option to convert the shares of Series B Preferred Stock may not be exercised until three months following the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock to the recipient shareholder. The Series B Preferred Stock has ten votes on matters presented to our shareholders for one share of Series B Preferred Stock held. The initial price of the Series B Preferred Stock shall be $2.50, (subject to adjustment by our Board of Directors) until such time, if ever, the Series B Preferred Stock are listed on a secondary and/or public exchange. As of December 31, 2013, no shares of Series B Preferred Stock had been issued.

 

In February 2014, our Board of Directors amended the initial price for the Series B Preferred Stock from $2.50 to $1.50 per share. Our Board of Directors also amended the conversion feature of the Series B Preferred Stock, to convertiblepermit conversion to common shares $0.0001 par value, to convert at a 40% market discount to current market value at the time we receive a conversion request. Current market value is defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices. Additionally, when Series B Preferred Stock shares convert to our common stock, the minimum price discount floor level is set at $0.005, as decided by our Board of Directors.

In September 2016, four holders of our Series B Preferred Stock converted 125,337 Series B Preferred Stock into 35,703,979 shares of our common stock at conversion prices ranging from $0.00383 to $0.00532 per share.

As of December 31, 2014,2016, there were 142,00450,001 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

Issuanceoutstanding, 16,667 of Series A Preferred Stock

In February 2011, we issued threewhich convert to common shares at a 30% market discount and 33,334 of non-convertible Series A preferred stock valued at $329,000 per share, or $987,000 in aggregate, for voting purposes only,which convert to the three members of our management team at one share each. The issued and outstandingcommon shares of the Series A preferred stock have voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total issued and outstanding shares of the our common stock. This effectively provided them, upon retention of their Series A Preferred Stock, voting control on matters presented to our shareholders. They have each irrevocably waived their conversion rights relating to the Series A preferred shares issued.

Sales of Shares of Series B Preferred Stock

In February 2014, we sold subscriptions to three individuals for the purchase of shares of our Series B preferred stock at $1.50 per share. We sold a total of 25,335 shares, for $38,000, that are convertible into shares of our common stock at a 40% discount to current market value, defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices upon receipt of a conversion notice, and with a minimum price level set by our Board of Directors at $0.005. The Series B preferred shares can be converted at any time after six months from the subscription agreements, but only once every 30 days.

In March 2014, we sold subscriptions to one individual for the purchase of shares of our Series B preferred stock at $1.50 per share. We sold a total of 16,667 shares, for $25,000, that are convertible into shares of our common stock at a 40% discount to current market value, defined as the average of the immediately prior five trading day's closing prices upon receipt of a conversion notice, and with a minimum price level set by our Board of Directors at $0.005. The Series B preferred shares can be converted at any time after six months from the subscription agreements, but only once every 30 days.discount.

 

All of the above offerings and sales, except the afore-mentioned shares issued pursuant to a conversion of convertible notes, were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, based on the following: (a) the investors confirmed to us that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and had such background, education and experience in financial and business matters as to be able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the securities; (b) there was no public offering or general solicitation with respect to the offering; (c) the investors were provided with certain disclosure materials and all other information requested with respect to our company; (d) where applicable, the investors acknowledged that all securities being purchased were “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, and agreed to transfer such securities only in a transaction registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or exempt from registration under the Securities Act; and (e) where applicable, a legend was placed on the certificates representing each such security stating that it was restricted and could only be transferred if subsequent registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or1933or transferred in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933.

     


Voting Rights

 

Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.

 

Each share of the issued and outstanding shares of the Series A preferred stock have voting rights equal to eighty percent of the total issued and outstanding shares of our common stock.stock

 

Dividends

 

Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any then-outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, and any other restrictions, holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably those dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors out of legally available funds. We and our predecessors have not declared any dividends in the past. Further, we do not presently contemplate that there will be any future payment of any dividends on Common Stock.

 

37
Table of Contents


Amendment of our Bylaws


Our bylaws may be adopted, amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding shares. Subject to applicable law, our bylaws also may be adopted, amended or repealed by our Board of Directors.


Transfer Agent

 

Our transfer agent is Worldwide Stock Transfer, LLC. Their address is One University Plaza, Suite 505, Hackensack, NJ 07601.

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

 

None of the following parties has, since our date of incorporation, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction with us or in any presently proposed transaction that has or will materially affect us:

 

·o

Any of our directors or officers, except as described below;

·o

Any person proposed as a nominee for election as a director;

·o

Any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock;

·o

Any of our promoters;

·o

Any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons who has the same house address as such person.

 

RELATED PARTY CONVERTIBLE NOTES

 

Mark L. Kay,At December 31, 2016 and 2015, convertible notes payable - related parties consist of 12 convertible notes payable in the aggregate of $355,500. The notes are unsecured and due December 31, 2017. Six notes totaling $268,000 are due to our Chief Executive Officer, loaned us an aggregate of $568,000 during 2004, 2005 and 2006, memorialized in the form of convertible loans. As of December 31, 2014 an aggregate amount of $268,000 remained outstanding. The details of these convertible notes are as follows: 

In February 2004, we issuedat a principal amount $60,000 convertible note with common stock purchase warrants to purchase 1 share of common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to Mr. Kay, our CEO. The note payable had a maturity date of September 30, 2005 and an amended fixedcompounded interest rate of 8%. The conversion feature allows Mr. Kay per annum; two notes totaling $57,000 are due to convertour VP of Technology, interest at prime plus 2% and prime plus 4% per annum; and four notes totaling $30,000 are due to the note into sharesspouse of our common stockChief Technology Officer at $9,750,000a compounded interest rate of 8% per annum. $33,000 of the notes are convertible at the fixed conversion price of $7,312,500 per share and $322,500 of the notes are convertible at the fixed conversion price of $9,750,000,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The warrant exercise period ended February 2014. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date ofdefined in the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.


In June 2004, we issued a principal amount $50,000 convertible note to Mr. Kay, our CEO. The note payable had a maturity date of December 31, 2005 and an amended fixed interest rate of 8%. The conversion feature allows Mr. Kay to convert the note into shares of our common stock at $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

In September 2004, we issued a principal amount $30,000 convertible note with common stock purchase warrants to purchase 1 share of common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to Mr. Kay, our CEO. The note had a maturity date of December 31, 2005 and an amended fixed interest rate of 8%. The conversion feature allows Mr. Kay to convert the note into shares of our common stock at $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The warrant exercise period ended in September 2014. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

In August 2005, we issued a principal amount $90,000 convertible note with common stock purchase warrants to purchase 1 share of common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to Mr. Kay, our CEO. The note payable had a maturity date of December 31, 2005 and an amended fixed interest rate of 8%. The conversion feature allows Mr. Kay to convert the note into shares of our common stock at $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The warrant exercise period ends August 2015. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

In January 2006, we issued a principal amount $10,000 convertible note with common stock purchase warrants to purchase 1 share of common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to Mr. Kay, our CEO. The note payable had a maturity date of December 31, 2006 and an amended fixed interest rate of 8%. The conversion feature allows Mr. Kay to convert the note into shares of our common stock at $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The warrant exercise period ends January 2016. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

In February 2006, we issued a principal amount $28,000 convertible note with common stock purchase warrants to purchase 1 share of common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to Mr. Kay, our CEO. The note payable had a maturity date of December 31, 2006 and an amended fixed interest rate of 8%. The conversion feature allows Mr. Kay to convert the note into shares of our common stock at $7,312,500 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The warrant exercise period ends February 2016. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

For the seven months ended July 31, 2006, the variable interest rate of the six outstanding notes ranged between 8.625% and 11.000% per annum. In September 2006, the interest rate of the six open notes was revised to a fixed rate of 8%, effective August 1, 2006.

Michael C. Brenner, one of our Vice Presidents, loaned us an aggregate of $65,000 during 2003 and 2004, memorialized in the form of convertible loans. As of December 31, 2014 an aggregate amount of $57,500 remained outstanding. The details of these convertible notes are as follows: 

In November 2003, we issued a principal amount $50,000 convertible note with common stock purchase warrants to purchase 1 share of common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to Mr. Michael Brenner, one of our Vice Presidents. The note payable had a maturity date of December 31, 2004 and an interest rate of prime plus two percent. The conversion feature allows Mr. Michael Brenner to convert the note into shares of our common stock at $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The warrant exercise period ended in November 2013. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

In January 2004, we issued a principal amount $15,000 convertible note with common stock purchase warrants to purchase 1 share of common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split, to Mr. Michael Brenner, one of our Vice Presidents. The note payable had a maturity date of December 31, 2004 and an interest rate of prime plus four percent. The conversion feature allows Mr. Michael Brenner to convert the note into shares of our common stock at $9,750,000 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The warrant exercise period ended in January 2014. In December 2004, Mr. Michael Brenner elected to convert half of the principal amount, $7,500, into common stock at a conversion price of $7,020,000 and received 1 share of our common stock, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

Other related party convertible notes:

In August, September and December 2005 and March 2006, we executed 8% convertible promissory notes in the amounts of $10,000, $5,000, $10,000 and $5,000 with one of its Software Developers and a relative of the Chief Technology Officer. The conversion feature allows the note holder to convert the first three notes into shares of our common stock at $9,750,000 per share and the fourth note into shares of our common stock at $7,312,500 per share, as adjusted by our 1:650 reverse stock split. The principal due hereunder shall be payable in full in immediately available funds of one million dollars or more through any sales or investment by the end of December 31, 2005, for the 2005 notes, and December 31, 2006, for the 2006 note, or later if agreed upon by the individual and us. In December 2005, the maturity dates of the 2005 notes were extended to March 31, 2006. In April 2007, the interest calculation was amended from simple to compound effective April 1, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.agreements.

 

At December 31, 2014, and 2013, accrued interest due for the convertible notes – related parties was $339,812 and $292,449, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets. Interest expense for convertible notes payable – related parties for$339,812. During the year ended December 31, 20142015, interest expense of $51,189 was accrued and 2013at December 31, 2015, accrued interest due for the convertible notes – related parties was $47,363$391,001. During the year ended December 31, 2016, interest expense of $55,721 was accrued, and $43,843, respectively.$9,417 of accrued interest due a former officer was forgiven and written-off. At December 31, 2016, accrued interest due for the convertible notes – related parties was $437,305.

  

 

38
Table of Contents

 

RELATED PARTY PROMISSORY NOTES

 

Notes payable - related party consist of 18 unsecured notes payable to our Chief Executive Officer ranging in interest rates of 0% per annum to 10% per annum. The notes have extended due dates of December 31, 2017 and all are shown as current liabilities. At December 31, 2014, we had executed twenty2016 and 2015, the balance of the outstanding notes payable with its CEO that have an aggregate open balance of $722,638:- related party was $742,513 and $722,618, respectively.

·

Three of the notes, aggregating $189,000, had maturity dates of December 31, 2005 with interest at a per annum rate equal to the CEO’s private account monthly lending rate. In December 2005, the maturity dates of the notes were extended to March 31, 2006. In September 2006, the maturity dates of the notes were extended to March 31, 2007 and the interest rate was revised to a fixed rate of 8%, effective August 1, 2006. The maturity dates of the notes have been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

Two of the notes, aggregating $160,000 have maturity dates of May 13, 2006 for the $150,000 note and September 30, 2006 for the $10,000 note. Both notes bear interest at a rate equal to 8% per annum. In September 2006, the maturity dates of the notes were extended to March 31, 2007. The maturity dates of the notes have been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

Three of the notes, in the amounts of $7,000, $5,000 and $150,000, were executed in April 2006 and bear interest at a per annum rate equal to the CEO’s private account monthly lending rate. The $7,000 note was repaid in April 2006. The $5,000 note has a maturity date of September 30, 2006. The $150,000 note has a maturity date of June 30, 2006. In September 2006, the maturity dates of the notes were extended to March 31, 2007 and the interest rate was revised to a fixed rate of 8%, effective August 1, 2006. The maturity dates of the notes have been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

One of the notes, in the amount of $100,000, was executed in May 2006 and bears interest at a rate equal to 9% per annum with a maturity date of July 31, 2006. In September 2006, the maturity date of the $100,000 note was extended to March 31, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

One of the notes, in the amount of $22,000, was executed in February 2007 and bears interest at a rate equal to 8% per annum with a maturity date of July 31, 2007. In September 2006, the maturity date of the $22,000 note was extended to March 31, 2007. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

One of the notes, in the amount of $50,000, was executed in March 2010 and bears interest at a rate equal to 10% per annum with a maturity date of April 30, 2010. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

One of the notes, in the amount of $2,400, was executed in June 2010 and was non-interest bearing with a maturity date of August 31, 2010. The maturity date of the note has been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

Four of the notes, in the amounts of $13,500, executed in July 2010, $3,000, executed in August 2010, and $19,000 and $2,800, executed in September 2010, were non-interest bearing and have extended maturity dates of April 30, 2011. Partial repayments of the July 2010 note were made in August 2010 for $3,100, September 2010 for $3,480 and February 2011 for $2,700. The maturity dates of the notes have been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

One of the notes, in the amount of $20,761, resulted in the assignment of six of our open receivables invoices to the CEO. The assignment was non-interest bearing and fee free with a due date for repayment of November 20, 2010. Partial repayments of the assignment were made in October 2010 for $4,218 and November 2010 for $4,125. The due date of the assignment has been extended to December 31, 2015.

·

The remaining note, in the amount of $2,800, was executed in March 2011 and was non-interest bearing with an extended maturity date of December 31, 2015.

 

At December 31, 2014 and 2013,2015, accrued interest due for the notes payable – related partiesparty was $492,573$548,653. During the year ended December 31, 2016, interest expense of $56,233 was accrued, and $436,493, respectively,accrued interest of $13,102 owed to a former officer was forgiven and is included inwritten-off. At December 31, 2016, accrued expenses ininterest due for the accompanying balance sheets.notes payable – related party was $591,784. Interest expense for notes payable - related partiesparty for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 20132015 was $56,080 and $56,080, respectively.$56,080.

  

DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

 

Wyoming corporation law provides that:

 

·

·

a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful;

·

·

a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys' fees actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matter as to which such a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper; and

·

·

to the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, the corporation shall indemnify him against expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense.

  

 

39
Table of Contents

 

Our articles of incorporation require us to indemnify our directors and officers against all damages incurred in connection with our business to the fullest extent provided or allowed by law.

 

Our bylaws provide that we will advance all expenses incurred to any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suite or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was our director or officer, or is or was serving at our request as a director or executive officer of another company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, prior to the final disposition of the proceeding, promptly following request. This advancement of expenses is to be made upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such person to repay said amounts should it be ultimately determined that the person was not entitled to be indemnified under our bylaws or otherwise.

 

Our bylaws also provide that no advance shall be made by us to any officer in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, if a determination is reasonably and promptly made: (a) by the board of directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the proceeding; or (b) if such quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable, a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, that the facts known to the decision-making party at the time such determination is made demonstrate clearly and convincingly that such person acted in bad faith or in a manner that such person did not believe to be in or not opposed to our best interests.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Commission this indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Fees billed by Weinberg & Company, P.A. for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 related to the Company’s audit services were approved by the Audit Committee and paid by the Company.

 

The following table shows the audit fees incurred for fiscal year 20142016 and 2013:2015:

 

 2014   2013 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Audit fees (1)

 

$

49,500

   

$

49,500

 

 

$67,500

 

$45,000

 

Audit related fees (2)

 

$

-

   

-

 

 

-

 

-

 

Tax fees (3)

  

2,500

   

2,500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

52,000

   

$

52,000

 

 

$67,500

 

 

$45,000

 

______________

(1)

(1)

Audit Fees – This category includes the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with engagements for those years and services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory audits and SEC regulatory filings or engagements.

 

(2)

(2)Audit-Related Fees – This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees”.

 

(3)

(3)

Tax Fees – This category consists of professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance and tax advice. The services for the fees disclosed under this category include tax return preparation and technical tax advice.

40
Table of Contents

  

The Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with the our management and independent registered public accounting firm our audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our 20142016 fiscal year. The Board has also discussed with the auditors the matters required to be discussed pursuant to SAS No. 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU Section 380), which includes, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of our financial statements.

 

The Board has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and has discussed with its auditors its independence from us. The Board has considered whether the provision of services other than audit services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.

 

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Board approved the inclusion of the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our 20142016 fiscal year for filing with the SEC.

 

Pre-Approval Policies

 

The Board's policy is now to pre-approve all audit services and all permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm; provided, however, pre-approval requirements for non-audit services are not required if all such services (1) do not aggregate to more than five percent of total revenues paid by us to our accountant in the fiscal year when services are provided; (2) were not recognized as non-audit services at the time of the engagement; and (3) are promptly brought to the attention of the Board and approved prior to the completion of the audit.

 

The Board pre-approved all fees described above.

 

 

41
Table of Contents

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

 

Exhibit Number

Description

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.(1)

3.2

Amended Articles of Incorporation of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (5)

3.3

By-laws of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (1)

3.4

Amended By-laws of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (5)

3.5

Amended By-laws of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (6)

3.6

Articles of Amendment of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (6)

10.1

2004 Stock Option Plan (1)

10.2

Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 20, 2004, by and among StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP. (1)

10.3

Secured Convertible Debenture with YA Global Investments, LP. (1)

10.4

Investor Registration Rights Agreement dated December 20, 2004, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement.(2)

10.5

Escrow Agreement, dated December 20, 2004, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement. (2)

10.6

Security Agreement dated December 20, 2004, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement. (1)

10.7

Secured Convertible Debenture with YA Global Investments, LP dated January 18, 2005. (1)

10.8

Royalty Agreement with NetLabs.com, Inc. and Amendments. (1)

10.9

Employment Agreement dated as of May 20, 2003, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Mark L. Kay. (1)

10.10

Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Debenture with YA Global Investments, LP dated April 27, 2005. (1)

10.11

Amendment and Consent dated as of April 27, 2005, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP. (1)

10.12

Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. (1)

10.13

Investor Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. (2)

10.14

Secured Convertible Debenture with Highgate House Funds, Ltd. dated April 27, 2005. (2)

10.15

Escrow Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc., Highgate House Funds, Ltd. and Gottbetter & Partners, LLP. (1)

10.16

Escrow Shares Escrow Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc., Highgate House Funds, Ltd. and Gottbetter & Partners, LLP. (1)

10.17

Security Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. (1)

10.18

Network Service Agreement with Panasonic Management Information Technology Service Company dated August 1, 2003 (and amendment). (1)

10.19

Client Non-Disclosure Agreement. (1)

10.20

Employee Non-Disclosure Agreement. (1)

10.21

Secured Convertible Debenture with Highgate House Funds, Ltd. dated May 6, 2005. (2)

10.22

Termination Agreement with YA Global Investments, LP dated February 19, 2005. (1)

10.23

Securities Purchase Agreement with WestPark Capital, Inc. (4)

10.24

Form of Promissory Note with WestPark Capital, Inc. (4)

10.25

Investor Registration Rights Agreement with WestPark Capital, Inc. (4)

10.26

Drawdown Equity Financing Facility with Auctus Private Equity Fund, LLC., dated April 13, 2012 (7)

10.27

Registration Rights Agreement with Auctus Private Equity Fund, LLC, dated April 13, 2012 (7)

10.28

StrikeForce Technologies Inc. WEBEX Presentation dated May 30, 2012 (8)

10.29

Irrevocable Waiver of Conversion Rights of Mark L. Kay (9)

10.30

Irrevocable Waiver of Conversion Rights of Ramarao Pemmaraju (9)

10.31

Irrevocable Waiver of Conversion Rights of George Waller (9)

10.32

CFO Consultant Agreement with Philip E. Blocker (9)

10.33

Resume of Philip E. Blocker (9)

10.34

Corporate Resolution for Issuance of Common Stock to Auctus Private Equity Fund, LLC (9)

10.35

Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement (11)

 

 

42
Table of Contents

  

10.36

2012 Stock Option Plan (12)

10.37

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws (13)

10.38

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws (14)

10.39

Registration of Classes of Securities (15)

10.40

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws (16)

10.41

Registration of Classes of Securities (17)

10.42

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws (18)

10.43

Registration of Classes of Securities (19)

10.44

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws (20)

10.45

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws (21)

10.46

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws (22)

10.47

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylawso (23)

10.48

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (24)

10.49

Asset Purchase Agreement between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Cyber Safety, Inc., dated August 24, 2015 (25)

10.51

to the Asset Purchase Agreement and Distributor and Reseller Agreement between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Cyber Safety, Inc. (26)

31.1

Certification by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, promulgated pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (3)

31.2

Certification by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, promulgated pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (3)

32.1

Certification by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, promulgated pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (3)

32.2

Certification by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, promulgated pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (3)

___________________________

(1)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form SB-2 dated as of May 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 dated as of June 27, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

(3)

Filed herewith.

(4)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(5)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated December 23, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

(6)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

(7)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated May 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(8)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated May 30, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(9)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form S-1/A dated July 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(10)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form S-1/A dated September 7, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(11)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 3, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(12)

Filed in conjunction with the Registrant’s Form 14A filed October 5, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(13)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated February 5, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(14)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated May 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(15)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-A dated July 29, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(16)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 22, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(17)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-A dated October 3, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(18)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 3, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(19)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-A dated December 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(20)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated December 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

(21)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated March 18, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(22)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated December 22, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(23)

Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated February 13, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.

(24)Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 4, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
(25)Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 28, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
(26)Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated February 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

43
Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 


 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

   

Dated: April 15, 2015

14, 2017

By:

By

/s/ Mark L. Kay

Mark L. Kay
Chief Executive Officer

 

Mark L. Kay

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 15, 201514, 2017

By:

/s/ Philip E. Blocker

 

Philip E. Blocker

Chief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature 

Title 

Date 

/s/ Mark L. Kay

Director 

April 15, 201514, 2017 

Name: Mark L. Kay

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Ramarao Pemmaraju

Director 

April 14, 2017 

Name: Ramarao Pemmaraju

 

April 15, 2015 

Name: Ramarao Pemmaraju

/s/ George Waller

Director

April 15, 201514, 2017 

Name: George Waller

 

 

 

 

 


44