We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Kange Corp. (the Company) as of November 31, 2017, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended November 30, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of November 30, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended November 30, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Consideration of the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations and its current cash flow is not enough to meet current needs. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to this matternotes are also described in Note

1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Asintegral part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control overthese financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.statements.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Haynie & Company

Salt Lake City, Utah

April 18, 2018

We have served as the company’s auditor since 2017. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

KANGE CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOVEMBER 30, 20182021 and 20172020

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

Organization

Kange Corp. (“Kange,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 16, 2013. We are a start-up company developing mobile software products for Apple and Android platforms, starting in Estonia and Europe, which is our initial intended market. Apple is a trademark of Apple Inc., and Android is a trademark of Alphabet Inc. During 2017, we began focusing on the intersection of technology and wholistic technology-based health treatments. We retained an advisor having substantial experience in the technology sector, and two former professional athletes to advise us regarding sports health issues and treatments. We intend to provide services to formulate a treatment model to meet the needs of professional athletes that suffer from PTSD and the early onset of dementia and Alzheimer’s. The Company is currently evaluating operations in the wholistic health industry.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) of the United States.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For certain of our financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and short-term loans the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy to classify and disclose all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, in periods subsequent to their initial measurement. The hierarchy requires the Company to use observable inputs when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs, when determining fair value. The three tiers are defined as follows:

The Company’s financial instruments, including cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and due to related parties are carried at historical cost. At November 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the carrying amounts of these instruments approximated their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company values marketable securities as level 1 and are measured at fair value (see Note 3).

Investments in Equity

We measure all equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value with the change in fair value included in net income. We use quoted market prices to determine the fair value of equity securities with readily determinable fair values. For equity securities without readily determinable fair values, we have elected the measurement alternative under which we measure these investments at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Management assesses each of these investments on an individual basis.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company used cash in operating activities of $7,103$50,831 for the year ended November 30, 2018.2021. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $1,320,254$1,361,587 at November 30, 2018.2021. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate revenues and its ability to continue receiving investment capital and loans from related parties to sustain its current level of operations. The Company is in the process of securing working capital from investors for common stock, convertible notes payable, and/or strategic partnerships. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in these efforts.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaGAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The estimates and judgments will also affect the reported amounts for certain expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these good faith estimates and judgments.

Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share

In accordance with ASC 260-10,260, “Earnings per Share,” basic net earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period, which are excluded from the computation if anti-dilutive. There are no dilutive or potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The deferred tax assets of the Company relate primarily to operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes. A full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets has been provided because the Company believes it is not more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on the Company generating sufficient taxable income in future periods.

The Company periodically evaluates its tax positions to determine whether it is more likely than not that such positions would be sustained upon examination by a tax authority for all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, based on their technical merits. As of November 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the Company has not established a liability for uncertain tax positions.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company reviews new accounting pronouncements as issued. Except as disclosed in Note 3, noNo new pronouncements had any material effect on these financial statements. The accounting pronouncements issued subsequent to the date of these financial statements that were considered significant by management were evaluated for the potential effect on these financial statements. Management does not believe any of the subsequent pronouncements will have a material effect on these financial statements as presented and does not anticipate the need for any future restatement of these financial statements because of the retro-active application of any accounting pronouncements issued subsequent to November 30, 20182021 through the date these financial statements were issued.

NOTE 2 – PREPAID EXPENSES

During the year ended November 30, 2017, the Company issued a total of 155,000 shares of common stock to five separate consultants pursuant to advisory board agreements. Three advisory board agreements were made effective on May 25, 2017 with terms of 15,000 shares each to be issued for one year of services to be rendered. Two advisory board agreements were made effective on October 1, 2017 with terms of 30,000 shares each to be issued for one year of services. The Company valued the advisory agreement shares based on the closing stock price of the Company on the date of the executed agreement (the grant date), which resulted in a total combined value of $124,000 initially recorded as prepaid expense to be amortized ratably over the contract term.

During the years ended November 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded consulting expense in the amounts of $66,312 and $57,688, respectively, resulting in the remaining balance of prepaid expense, the uncompleted portion of the contract, of $0 and $66,312 at November 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

NOTE 3 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES

We adopted ASU 2016-01 on December 1, 2017, which requires us to measure all equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value and recognize any changes in earnings. We use quoted market prices to determine the fair value of equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

On November 1, 2017, the Company executed a stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with AMJ Global Entertainment, LLC, a related party and holder of 4,803,195 shares of common stock in Patient Access Solutions Inc., a Nevada corporation with ticker symbol “PASO”. Pursuant to the SPA, the Company issued 157,142 shares of common stock in exchange for 1,157,142 shares of Patient Access Solutions Inc. On November 1, 2017, the Company recorded the shares of Patient Access Solutions Inc. at $81,000. As of November 30, 2018, based quoted market prices, the Company recognized an unrealized loss of $74,751.

The carrying values and unrealized loss of our equity securities were included in the following line items in our balance sheets and statements of operations:

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In support of the Company’s efforts and cash requirements, it may rely on advances from related parties until such time that the Company can support its operations or attains adequate financing through sales of its equity or traditional debt financing. There is no formal written commitment for continued support by shareholders. Amounts represent advances or amounts paid in satisfaction of liabilities. The advances are non-interest bearing, considered temporary in nature, and have not been formalized by a promissory note.

On November 1, 2017, the Company entered into a one-year office lease agreement with AMJ Global Entertainment LLC, a related party controlled by the Company’s CEO and director, ending November 2, 2018. The location of the leased office space is 11724 Ventura Blvd Suite B, Studio City, California 91604. The lease states monthly rent due of $1,000. During the year ended November 30, 2018, the Company accrued $11,000 due to related party. As of November 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company has accrued lease expense due to related party of $8,000 and $1,000, respectively.

At November 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the Company owed $5,776$67,107 and $26,901,$16,276, respectively, to AMJ Global Entertainment LLC, a related party controlled by the Company’s CEO and director. The amount isamounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand. During the year ended November 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the Company received proceeds of $7,026$50,831 and $16,651,$2,500, respectively, from the related party. On March 5, 2018, the Company settled the loans totaling $28,151 plus $4,000 of accrued related party lease expense by the issuance of 387,623 shares of common stock valued at $484,529. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $452,378.

NOTE 53 – COMMON STOCK

Common Stock

The Company has authorized common shares of 750,000,000, par value $0.001 per share. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote. All shares of common stock are non-assessable and non-cumulative, with no pre-emptive rights.

In the year ended November 30, 2017, the Company issued 3,283,700 shares to a related party for the conversion of $54,252 of principal convertible debt and $11,423 of accrued interest.

During the year ended November 30, 2017, the Company issued a total of 155,000 shares of common stock to five separate consultants pursuant to advisory board agreements.

On November 1, 2017, the Company executed a stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with AMJ Global Entertainment, LLC, anothera related party company controlled by our CEO and director, Dr. Arthur Malone, Jr., to purchase 1,157,142 shares of Patient Access Solutions Inc., a Nevada corporation with ticker symbol “PASO” (“PASO”), in consideration of the issuance of 157,142 shares of our common stock. On January 13, 2020, the transaction was rescinded and on July 19, 2021 the Company returned 1,157,142 shares of Patient Access Solutions Inc. back to AMJ Global Entertainment, LLC in exchange for cancelling 157,142 shares of the Company.

There were 14,396,323 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of November 30, 2021 and 2020.

On March 5, 2018, the Company issued 387,623 shares of common stock valued at $484,529 to settle debt of $32,151 owed to a related party (Note 4).

There were 14,553,465 and 14,165,842 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of November 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

NOTE 64 – INCOME TAXES

The Company’s tax expense differs from the “expected” tax expense for Federal income tax purposes (computed by applying the United States Federal tax rate of 21% to loss before taxes), as follows:

The tax effects of the temporary differences between reportable financial statement income and taxable income are recognized as deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The tax effect of significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilitiesasset at November 30, 20182021 and 2017, respectively, are2020 is as follows:

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

Because of the historical earnings history of the Company, the net deferred tax asset for 20182021 was fully offset by a 100% valuation allowance. The valuation allowance for the remaining net deferred tax assets was $156,734$165,414 and $28,215$155,054 as of November 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

The Company’s tax returns are subject to examination by tax authorities beginning with the year ended November 30, 2013.

NOTE 75 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 13, 2020,27, 2022 the transaction relatedCompany adopted the Board Resolution and issued 65,227,000 shares of common stock against amount owed to stock purchase agreement with AMJ Global Entertainment LLC, a related party controlled by the Company’s CEO and holder of 4,803,195director, and 10,000,000 shares of common stock in Patient Access Solutions Inc. (see Note 3), was rescinded,as a one-time bonus to Dr. Art Malone Jr. for his services as Chairman and on July 19, 2021 the Company returned 1,157,142 shares of Patient Access Solutions Inc. back to AMJ Global Entertainment, LLC in exchange for 157,142 sharesCEO of the Company.

The Company has evaluated events occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date through the date these financial statements were issued, and determined there are no additional events requiring disclosure.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

We have had no disagreements with our accountants required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 304 of Regulation S-K.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of and for the year ended November 30, 2018,2021, covered by this Form 10-K. Based upon such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as required under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and related financial information appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements and notes have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The management of the Company is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is defined as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2018,2021, based upon the framework in Internal Control –Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013. Based on that evaluation, our management has concluded that, as of November 30, 2018,2020, the Company had material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting were not effective. Specifically, management identified the following material weaknesses at November 30, 2018:2021:

To remediate our internal control weaknesses, management intends to implement the following measures:

The additional hiring is contingent upon the Company’s efforts to obtain additional funding through equity or debt for its continued operational activities and corporate expenses. Management provides no assurances that it will be able to do so.

We understand that remediation of material weaknesses and deficiencies in internal controls are a continuing work in progress due to the issuance of new standards and promulgations. However, remediation of any known deficiency is among our highest priorities. Our management will periodically assess the progress and sufficiency of our ongoing initiatives and make adjustments as and when necessary.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide, and this annual report does not include, an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except as set forth above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of the control system must reflect that there are resource constraints and that the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The following table sets forth information with respect to persons who are serving as directors and officers of the Company. Each director holds office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his successor has been elected and qualified.

__________

(1) Appointed on November 9, 2015.

Biographies of Directors and Officers

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience during at least the past five years of each director, executive officer and key employee of our company, indicating the person’s principal occupation during that period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.

Dr. Arthur “Art” Malone, Jr.

From 2010 through the current date, Dr. Malone has been an entrepreneur, whether it be from investing in public and private companies to creating business opportunities for those not as fortunate, to advising public or private companies on corporate structure. Dr. Malone was formerly the Chairman and CEO of Songstagram, a mobile app company, that he resigned from, and which sold its interests in licensing agreements to a publicly traded company, bBooth, Inc., and formerly the Chairman and CEO of Medresponse Corp. (f/k/a Merecot Corp., MEDR) in 2015 when he sold his interests in November 2015. Dr. Malone, through his company, AMJ Global, has also created a clothing line as well as an entertainment company, and Dr. Malone taught over 5 years at Channel Islands Bible College. Dr. Malone attended the University of Washington where he studied Criminal Law and Sociology. Dr. Malone also attended Kings Seminary as well as Channel Islands Bible College. Dr. Malone holds a Bachelor’s Degree, as well as two Masters Degrees, and a Ph.D. The Company believes that Dr. Malone’s extensive experience in the technology sector and with small public companies qualifies him to serve as a director of the Company. The terms of Dr. Malone’s employment have not yet been determined. Dr. Malone, through AMJ Global LLC and AMJ Global Entertainment LLC, owns approximately 96.7% of the voting securities of the Company as of November 30, 2018.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors and executive officers.2021.

Our directors are elected at the annual meeting of the shareholders, with vacancies filled by the Board of Directors, and serve until their successors are elected and qualified, or their earlier resignation or removal. Officers are appointed by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors or until their earlier resignation or removal. Any action required can be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of the corporation which may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if consent of consents in writing setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of the outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted and shall be delivered to the corporation by delivery to its registered office, its principle place of business, or an officer or agent of the corporation having custody of the book in which the proceedings of meetings are recorded.

As we have recently devoted efforts to exploring the intersection of technology and wholistic technology-based health treatments for a variety of mental health conditions, from autism to dementia and Alzheimer’s, we have also retained Board of Advisors composed of advisors we believe are competent to advise us regarding technology, sports health issues and treatments, and PTSD.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Section 78.138 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) provides that a director or officer will not be individually liable unless it is proven that (i) the director’s or officer’s acts or omissions constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties, and (ii) such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law. Section 78.7502 of NRS permits a company to indemnify its directors and officers against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with a threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding if the officer or director (i) is not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138 or (ii) acted in good faith and in a manner the officer or director reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, if a criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct of the officer or director was unlawful. Section 78.751 of NRS permits a Nevada company to indemnify its officers and directors against expenses incurred by them in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding as they are incurred and in advance of final disposition thereof, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the officer or director to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that such officer or director is not entitled to be indemnified by the company. Section 78.751 of NRS further permits the company to grant its directors and officers additional rights of indemnification under its articles of incorporation or bylaws or otherwise. Section 78.752 of NRS provides that a Nevada company may purchase and maintain insurance or make other financial arrangements on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the company, or is or was serving at the request of the company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, for any liability asserted against him and liability and expenses incurred by him in his capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the company has the authority to indemnify him against such liability and expenses.

Our Articles of Incorporation provide that no director or officer of the Company will be personally liable to the Company or any of its stockholders for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer; provided, however, that the foregoing provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director or officer (i) for acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct, fraud or knowing violation of law, or (ii) the payment of dividends in violation of Section 78.300 of NRS. In addition, our Bylaws implement the indemnification and insurance provisions permitted by Chapter 78 of the NRS by providing that the Company shall indemnify its directors to the fullest extent permitted by the NRS and may, if and to the extent authorized by the board of directors, so indemnify its officers and any other person whom it has the power to indemnify against liability, reasonable expense or other matter whatsoever; and the Company may at the discretion of the board of directors purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who holds or who has held any position identified in the paragraph above against any and all liability incurred by such person in any such position or arising out of his status as such.

Insofar as indemnification by us for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling the company pursuant to provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification by such director, officer or controlling person of us in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being offered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

Director Compensation

During the fiscal year ended November 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, we did not have an independent director. Directors that were employees (i.e., Dr. Malone, our sole officer and director) were not paid any fees for their role as director.

Involvement on Certain Material Legal Proceedings During the Last Five Years

No director, officer, significant employee or consultant has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, exclusive of traffic violations.

No bankruptcy petitions have been filed by or against any business or property of any director, officer, significant employee or consultant of the Company nor has any bankruptcy petition been filed against a partnership or business association where these persons were general partners or executive officers.

No director, officer, significant employee or consultant has been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities.

No director, officer or significant employee has been convicted of violating a federal or state securities or commodities law.

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance

The Company does not have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance insuring our directors and officers against liability for acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers.

Code of Ethics

We intend to adopt a code of ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer, but have not done so to date due to our relatively small size. We intend to adopt a written code of ethics in the near future.

Corporate Governance and Board Independence

Our Board of Directors consists of one director and has not established a Nominating or Governance Committees as standing committees. The Board does not have an executive committee or any committees performing a similar function. We are not currently listed on a national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system that has requirements that a majority of the board of directors be independent.

Due to our lack of operations and size, and since we are not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we are not subject to any listing requirements mandating the establishment of any particular committees; all functions of a nominating/governance committee were performed by our whole board of directors. Our board of directors intends to appoint such persons and form such committees as are required to meet the corporate governance requirements imposed by the national securities exchanges as necessary. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees at the early stage of the company’s development, and our board of directors believes that the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by the members of our board of directors.

We believe that our board of directors is capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date.

Board Leadership Structure and the Board’s Role in Risk Oversight.

The Board of Directors is led by a Chairman, and at this time our Chairman is our sole director and is also our Chief Executive Officer. Although our sole officer is our sole director, the Board believes that the most effective leadership structure at this time is not to separate the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. A combined structure provides the Company with a single leader who represents the company to our stockholders, regulators, business partners and other stakeholders, among other reasons set forth below.

The Board of Directors does not have a specific role in risk oversight of the Company. The Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers and employees of the Company provide the Board of Directors with information regarding the Company’s risks.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The table below sets forth, for our last two fiscal years, the compensation earned by our executive officers.