Table of Contents


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 20132016

OR

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to ___________

For the transition period from              to             
Commission file No. 001-34757
SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Commission File No.

Name of Registrant, State of Incorporation,

Address of Principal Offices, and Telephone No.

IRS Employer Identification No.

Delaware

001-34757

27-2166630

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
a Delaware corporation)

3001 Deming Way

Middleton, WisconsinWI 53562

(608) 275-3340

www.spectrumbrands.com

53562

27-2166630

(Address of principal executive offices)

333-192634-03

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

(Zip Code)a Delaware limited liability company)

3001 Deming Way

Middleton, WI 53562

(608) 275-3340

27-2812840

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (608) 275-3340

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Registrant

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Common Stock, Par Value $0.01

New York Stock Exchange

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

None

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

1


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is aregistrants are well-known seasoned issuer,issuers, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  ý

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Yes

No

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Yes

No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant isregistrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  ý

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Yes

No

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Yes

No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantregistrants (1) hashave filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Yes

No

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Yes

No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant hasregistrants have submitted electronically and posted on itstheir corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Yes

No

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Yes

No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Registrant

Large Accelerated Filer

Large accelerated filerx

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

¨

X

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Yes

No

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Yes

No

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrantSpectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. was approximately $1,228,779,585$2,677,495,424 based upon the closing price on the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter (March 31, 2013)(April 3, 2016).* As of November 25, 201314, 2016, there were outstanding 52,423,49259,410,438 shares of the registrant'sSpectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share.

SB/RH Holdings, LLC meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and has therefore omitted the information otherwise called for by Items 10 to 13 of Form 10-K as allowed under General Instruction I(2)(c).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’sSpectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days of September 30, 20132016 are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in response to Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

2


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

*

For purposes of this calculation only, shares of the registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, held by directors and executive officers and by Harbinger Group Inc., Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd. and Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P. have been treated as owned by affiliates.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

Page

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

17 
PART I
ITEM 1.BUSINESS
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

35 

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

35 

ITEM 2.3.

PROPERTIES

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

37 
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

37 

PART II

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’SREGISTRANTS’ COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

38 

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

40 

ITEM7

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

41 

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

58 

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

59 

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

59 

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

59 

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

60 
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

PART III

ITEM10

PART III
ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

61 

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

61 
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

61 

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

62 

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

62 

PART IV

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

63 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

64 

SIGNATURES

122 

SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX

124 




3



PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Forward-Looking Statements

We have made or implied certain forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.report. All statements, other than statements of historical facts included in this Annual Report,report, including the statements under Item 7. Management’s“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations” regarding our business strategy, future operations, financial condition, estimated revenues, projected costs, projected synergies, prospects, plans and objectives of management, as well as information concerning expected actions of third parties, are forward-looking statements. When used in this Annual Report,report, the words  “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “believe,” “expect,” “project,” “could,” “will,” “should,” “may”anticipate,  intend,  plan,  estimate,  believe,  expect,  project,  could,  will,  should,  may and similar expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words.

Since these forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations of future events and projections and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control and some of which may change rapidly, actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those expressed or implied herein, and youundue reliance should not place undue reliancebe placed on these statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied herein include, without limitation:

·

the impact of our indebtedness on our business, financial condition and results of operations;

the impact of our substantial indebtedness on our business, financial condition and results of operations;

·

the impact of restrictions in our debt instruments on our ability to operate our business, finance our capital needs or pursue or expand business strategies;

the impact of restrictions in our debt instruments on our ability to operate our business, finance our capital needs or pursue or expand business strategies;

·

any failure to comply with financial covenants and other provisions and restrictions of our debt instruments;

any failure to comply with financial covenants and other provisions and restrictions of our debt instruments;

·

the impact of actions taken by significant stockholders;

our ability to successfully integrate the HHI Business and achieve the expected synergies from that integration at the expected costs;

·

the impact of expenses resulting from the implementation of new business strategies, divestitures or current and proposed restructuring activities;

the impact of expenses resulting from the implementation of new business strategies, divestitures or current and proposed restructuring activities;

·

our inability to successfully integrate and operate new acquisitions at the level of financial performance anticipated;

the impact of fluctuations in commodity prices, costs or availability of raw materials or terms and conditions available from suppliers, including suppliers’ willingness to advance credit;

·

the unanticipated loss of key members of senior management;

interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations;

·

the impact of fluctuations in commodity prices, costs or availability of raw materials or terms and conditions available from suppliers, including suppliers’ willingness to advance credit;

the loss of, or a significant reduction in, sales to any significant retail customer(s);

·

interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations;

competitive promotional activity or spending by competitors or price reductions by competitors;

·

our ability to utilize our net operating loss carry-forwards to offset tax liabilities from future taxable income;

the introduction of new product features or technological developments by competitors and/or the development of new competitors or competitive brands;

·

the loss of, significant reduction in, or dependence upon, sales to any significant retail customer(s);

the effects of general economic conditions, including inflation, recession or fears of a recession, depression or fears of a depression, labor costs and stock market volatility or changes in trade, monetary or fiscal policies in the countries where we do business;

·

competitive promotional activity or spending by competitors, or price reductions by competitors;

changes in consumer spending preferences and demand for our products;

·

the introduction of new product features or technological developments by competitors and/or the development of new competitors or competitive brands;

our ability to develop and successfully introduce new products, protect our intellectual property and avoid infringing the intellectual property of third parties;

·

the effects of general economic conditions, including inflation, recession or fears of a recession, depression or fears of a depression, labor costs and stock market volatility or changes in trade, monetary or fiscal policies in the countries where we do business;

our ability to successfully implement, achieve and sustain manufacturing and distribution cost efficiencies and improvements, and fully realize anticipated cost savings;

·

changes in consumer spending preferences and demand for our products;

the cost and effect of unanticipated legal, tax or regulatory proceedings or new laws or regulations (including environmental, public health and consumer protection regulations);

·

our ability to develop and successfully introduce new products, protect our intellectual property and avoid infringing the intellectual property of third parties;

public perception regarding the safety of our products, including the potential for environmental liabilities, product liability claims, litigation and other claims;

·

our ability to successfully implement, achieve and sustain manufacturing and distribution cost efficiencies and improvements, and fully realize anticipated cost savings;

the impact of pending or threatened litigation;

·

the cost and effect of unanticipated legal, tax or regulatory proceedings or new laws or regulations (including environmental, public health and consumer protection regulations);

changes in accounting policies applicable to our business;

·

public perception regarding the safety of products that we manufacture and sell, including the potential for environmental liabilities, product liability claims, litigation and other claims related to products manufactured by us and third parties;

government regulations;

·

the impact of pending or threatened litigation;

the seasonal nature of sales of certain of our products;

·

the impact of cybersecurity breaches or our actual or perceived failure to protect company and personal data;

the effects of climate change and unusual weather activity;

·

changes in accounting policies applicable to our business;

the effects of political or economic conditions, terrorist attacks, acts of war or other unrest in international markets;

·

government regulations;

the significant costs expected to be incurred in connection with the integration of us and the HHI Business;

·

the seasonal nature of sales of certain of our products;

the risk that we may become responsible for certain liabilities of the HHI Business;

·

the effects of climate change and unusual weather activity; and

the risk that integrating our business with that of the HHI Business may divert our management’s attention;

·

the effects of political or economic conditions, terrorist attacks, acts of war or other unrest in international markets.

our dedicating resources of the HHI Business to supply certain products and services to Stanley Black & Decker and its subsidiaries as required following the Hardware Acquisition;
general customer uncertainty related to the Hardware Acquisition; and

1


the limited period of time for which we have the right to use certain Stanley Black & Decker trademarks, brand names and logos.

Some of the above-mentioned factors are described in further detail in the sectionsections entitled “Risk Factors” set forth below.in our annual and quarterly reports (including this report), as applicable. You should assume the information appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport is accurate only as of September 30, 2013the end of the period covered by this report, or as otherwise specified, as our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States (“U.S.”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC,United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

4


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

This combined Form 10-K is being filed separately by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SB Holdings” orSBH”) and SB/RH Holdings, LLC (“SB/RH”) (collectively, the “Company”). SB/RH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBH and represents a majority of its assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and operations. Thus, all information contained in this report relates to, and is filed by, SBH. Information that is specifically identified in this report as relating solely to SBH, such as its financial statements and its common stock, does not relate to and is not filed by SB/RH. SB/RH makes no representation as to that information. The terms “the Company,” “we,” and “our” as used in this report, refer to both SBH and its consolidated subsidiaries and SB/RH and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. The terms “SBH” and “SB/RH” refer to Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and SB/RH Holdings, LLC, respectively.

Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), isare made available free of charge on or through our website at www.spectrumbrands.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with, or furnished to the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains our reports, proxy statements and other information at www.sec.gov. In addition, copies of our (i) Corporate Governance Guidelines, (ii) charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, (iii) Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and (iv) Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers are available at our Internet site at www.spectrumbrands.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.” Copies will also be provided to any stockholder upon written request to the Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Communications, Spectrum Brands, Inc. at 3001 Deming Way, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 or via electronic mail at investorrelations@spectrumbrands.com, or by contacting the Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Communications by telephone at (608) 275-3340.

General

We are a diversified global branded consumer products company. Spectrum Brands, Inc. (“Spectrum Brands”), is a wholly owned subsidiary of SB Holdings. SB Holdings' common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “SPB.”

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms the “Company,” “Spectrum,” “we,” “our” The Company manufactures, markets and/or “us” are used to refer to SB Holdings anddistributes its subsidiaries.
On December 17, 2012, we acquired the residential hardware and home improvement business (the “HHI Business”) from Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (“Stanley Black & Decker”), which includes (i) the equity interests of certain subsidiaries of Stanley Black & Decker engaged in the business and (ii) certain assets of Stanley Black & Decker used or held for use in connection with the business (together the “Hardware Acquisition”). On April 8, 2013, we completed the HHI Business acquisition by acquiring certain assets of Tong Lung Metal Industry Co. Ltd., a Taiwan Corporation ("TLM Taiwan”), which is involved in the production of residential locksets. For information pertaining to the Hardware Acquisition, see Note 15, “Acquisitions” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We manufacture and market alkaline, zinc carbon and hearing aid batteries, herbicides, insecticides and repellants and specialty pet supplies. We design and market rechargeable batteries, battery-powered lighting products, electric shavers and accessories, grooming products and hair care appliances. We also design, market and distribute a broad range of branded small household appliances and personal care products. Our manufacturing and product development facilities are located in the United States ("U.S."), Europe, Latin America and Asia. Substantially all of our rechargeable batteries, chargers and portable lighting products, shaving and grooming products, small household appliances and personal care products are manufactured by third-party suppliers, primarily located in Asia.
With the addition of the HHI Business, we design, manufacture, market, distribute and sell certain hardware, home improvement and plumbing products, and are a leading U.S. provider of residential locksets and builders' hardware and a leading provider of faucets. The HHI Business has a broad portfolio of recognized brands names, including Kwikset, Weiser, Baldwin, National Hardware, Stanley, FANAL and Pfister, as well as patented technologies such as Smartkey, a rekeyable lockset technology, and Smart Code Home Connect. HHI Business customers include retailers, non-retailers and homebuilders. The HHI Business has sales offices, manufacturing facilities and distribution centers in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and Asia.
We sell our products in approximately 140160 countries in the North America (“NA”); Europe, Middle East & Africa (“EMEA”); Latin America (“LATAM”) and Asia-Pacific (“APAC”) regions through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, industrial distributors and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), construction companies and hearing aid professionals. We enjoy strong name recognition in our marketsregions under the Rayovac, VARTA and Remington brands, each of which has been in existence for more than 80 years, and under the Tetra, 8-in-1, Dingo, Nature's Miracle, Spectracide, Cutter, Hot Shot, Black & Decker, George Foreman, Russell Hobbs, Farberware, Black Flag, FURminator, the previously mentioned HHI Businessour various brands and various other brands.
Our diversified global branded consumer products have positionspatented technologies across multiple product categories. We manage the business in seven major product categories: consumer batteries; small appliances; pet supplies; electric shaving and grooming; electric personal care; home and garden controls; and hardware and home improvement, which consists of the recently acquired HHI Business. Our chief operating decision-maker manages the businesses in fourfive vertically integrated, product-focused reporting segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances which consists of our worldwide battery, electric shaving and grooming, electric personal care, and small appliances primarily in the kitchen and home product categories (“Global Batteries & Appliances”GBA”);, (ii) Global Pet Supplies, which consists of our worldwide pet supplies business (“Global Pet Supplies”); (iii) Home and Garden Business, which consists of our home and garden and insect control business (the “Home and Garden Business”); and (iv) Hardware & Home Improvement which consists of the recently acquired HHI Business (“Hardware &HHI”), (iii) Global Pet Supplies (“PET”), (iv) Home Improvement”and Garden (“H&G”) and (v) Global Auto Care (“GAC”). Management reviews our performance based on these segments. For information pertaining to our business segments, see Note 11, “Segment Information” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on our operating segments.

2


Global and geographicGeographic strategic initiatives and financial objectives are determined at the corporate level. Each business segment is responsible for implementing defined strategic initiatives and achieving certain financial objectives and has a general manager responsible for sales and marketing initiatives and the financial results for all product lines within that segment. The following is an overview of the consolidated business segment.
showing the net sales by segment and geographic region sold (based upon destination) as a percentage of consolidated net sales for the year ended September 30, 2016:

Our operating performance is influenced by a number of factors including: general economic conditions; foreign exchange fluctuations; trends in consumer markets; consumer confidence and preferences; our overall product line mix, including pricing and gross margin, which vary by product line and geographic market; pricing of certain raw materials and commodities; energy and fuel prices; and our general competitive position, especially as impacted by our competitors’ advertising and promotional activities and pricing strategies. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion of the consolidated operating results.

5


Our Products

We compete in seven major product categories:Strategy

Our mission is to achieve superior shareholder returns through above-market organic growth, with a focus on building sustainable free cash flow and further acquisitions. Our vision is to be the preferred strategic partner to our customers with an expanding portfolio of innovative and superior-value consumer batteries; small appliances; pet supplies; electric shaving and grooming; electric personal care; home and garden controls; and hardware and home improvement. Our broad line of products include:

consumer batteries, including alkaline and zinc carbon batteries, rechargeable batteries and chargers, hearing aid batteries, other specialty batteries and portable lighting products;
small appliances, including small kitchen appliances and home product appliances;
pet supplies, including aquatic equipment and supplies, dog and cat treats, small animal foods, clean up and training aids, health and grooming products and bedding;
electric shavingbrands. We believe that building loyalty and grooming devices;
electric personal caresuccess over the long-term is fundamental to executing on this strategy. To transition to the next performance level and styling devices;
homedeliver long-term value to our key stakeholders, we will seek to realize our vision by pursuing the “Spectrum First” growth strategy across all of our divisions and garden control products, including household insect controls, insect repellentsregions.

The Spectrum First growth accelerators; Customer,  Process, and herbicides;People; provide the roadmap for how we intend to execute this strategy. Each growth accelerator has three drivers. These accelerators and their respective drivers are collectively known as the “Spectrum First 3x3.”

·

Customer – Our first growth accelerator focuses on strengthening strategic partnerships with customers. Our objective is for our retail partners to think of Spectrum Brands first when identifying how best to compete for consumers’ attention to bring them into their stores and online platforms with exciting product innovation, converting interest to sales through value products, and being a strategic supplier through total-cost reduction initiatives.

hardware

·

Process – Our process growth accelerator is intended to drive continuous improvements in our products, costs and processes to generate healthy margins through sales growth with our “more-more-more” strategy to achieve above-market sales growth, which means entering into more countries, serving more channels and launching more categories. We also seek to drive continuous improvement over performance, quality and costs, and provide superior and efficient services through our shared services and “Centers of Excellence” model.

·

People – Employees represent the third Spectrum First growth accelerator. We are working to be a preferred employer by empowering our teams and providing long-term career opportunities and pay-for-performance through focusing on retention and collaboration; driving empowered teams with trust, competence and speed; supporting alignment and providing more paths for employees to embrace new challenges and advance their careers across the global organization.

6


Global Batteries and home improvement products, including residential locksets, builders hardware and plumbing products.


NetAppliances (GBA)

The following is an overview of the GBA segment net sales of eachby product category and geographic region sold (based upon destination) as a percentage of net sales of our consolidated operations, is set forth below.

  
Percentage of Total Company
Net Sales for the Fiscal Year  Ended
September 30,
  2013 2012 2011
Consumer batteries 23% 29% 30%
Hardware and home improvement products 21% % %
Small appliances 18% 24% 24%
Pet supplies 15% 19% 18%
Home and garden control products 10% 12% 11%
Electric shaving and grooming products 7% 8% 9%
Electric personal care products 6% 8% 8%
  100% 100% 100%
Consumer Batteries
We market and sell a full linefor the segment for the year ended September 30, 2016:

The consumer batteries product category consists of alkaline batteries, (AA, AAA, C, Dzinc carbon batteries, nickel metal hydride (NiMH) rechargeable batteries and 9-volt sizes) to both retail and industrial customers. Our alkaline batteries are marketed and soldbattery chargers primarily under the RayovacRayovac® and VARTAVARTA® brands. We alsoAdditionally, we manufacture alkaline batteries for third parties who sell the batteries under their own private labels. Our zinc carbon batteries are also marketed and sold primarily under the Rayovac and VARTA brands and are designed for low and medium drain battery powered devices.

We believe that we are currently the largest worldwide marketer and distributor of hearing aid batteries. We sell our hearing aid batteries through retail trade channels and directly to professional audiologists under several brand names and private labels, including Beltone, Miracle Ear and Starkey.
We also sell Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) rechargeable batteries and a variety of battery chargers under the Rayovac and VARTA brands.
Our other specialty battery products include camera batteries, lithium batteries, silver oxide batteries, keyless entry batteries and coin cells for use in watches, cameras, calculators, communications equipment, medical instruments and on the go charges.

3


We also offer a broad line of battery-powered portable lighting products including flashlights and lanterns for both retail and industrial markets. We sell our portable lighting products under the RayovacRayovac® and VARTA brand names, underVARTA® brands, and other proprietary brand names and pursuant to licensing arrangements with third parties. We manufacture and sell hearing aid batteries under several brand names and private labels for many major hearing aid device manufacturers. Other specialty battery products include camera batteries, lithium batteries, silver oxide batteries, keyless entry batteries, portable chargers and coin cells for use in watches, cameras, calculators, communications equipment, and medical instruments.

The small appliances product category consists of small kitchen appliances under the Black & Decker®, Russell Hobbs®, George Foreman®, Juiceman® and Breadman® brands, including toaster ovens, toasters, sandwich makers, coffeemakers, coffee grinders, can openers, electric knives, grills, deep fryers, food choppers, food processors, slow cookers, hand mixers, blenders, juicers, bread makers, kettles, rice cookers and steamers. We also sell small home product appliances, including hand-held irons, vacuum cleaners, air purifiers, clothes shavers and heaters, primarily under the Black & Decker® and Russell Hobbs® brands.

The personal care product category includes a broad line of electric shaving and grooming products under the Remington® brand name, including men’s rotary and foil shavers, beard and mustache trimmers, body, nose and ear trimmers, women’s shavers, haircut kits and intense pulsed light hair removal systems. Other personal care products include hand-held dryers, curling irons, straightening irons, brush irons, hair setters, facial brushes, skin appliances, electric toothbrushes and hair accessories.

We manage our GBA sales teams by geographic region and product category. We sell primarily to large retailers, online retailers, wholesalers, distributors, warehouse clubs, food and drug chains and specialty trade or retail outlets such as consumer electronics stores, department stores, discounters and other specialty stores. We maintain separate sales teams to service (i) our retail sales and distribution channels; (ii) our hearing aid professionals channel; and (iii) our industrial distributors and OEM sales and distribution channel. International distribution varies by region and is often executed on a country-by-country basis. We utilize a network of independent brokers to service participants in selected distribution channels.

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion of the segment’s operating results.

7


Hardware and Home Improvement Products

In(HHI)

The following is an overview of the hardware and home improvementHHI segment net sales by product category we market and sellgeographic region sold (based upon destination) as a percentage of net sales for the segment for the year ended September 30, 2016:

The lockset product category includes a broad range of residential locksets and door hardware including knobs, levers, deadbolts, handlesetshandle sets and electronics. We offer our security hardwareelectronics under three main brands, Kwikset, Weiser and Baldwin. On a global basis we are one of the largest producers of tubular residential locksets. Kwikset includes opening to mid-price pointbrands: (i) Kwikset®, residential door hardware sold primarily in the U.S. retail and wholesale channels. Products are offered under the three brands Safe Lock, Kwikset and Kwikset Signature Series. Weiser offers opening to mid-price point; (ii) Weiser®, residential door hardware sold primarily in the Canadian retailCanada; and wholesale channels. Baldwin offers high price point(iii) Baldwin®, luxury hardware sold globally through the showroom and lumber yard channels.

Asresidential door hardware. Our residential lockset products also incorporate a demonstration of our design and engineering team’s ability to innovate, our patented SmartKeySmartKey® technology that enables consumers to easily rekey their locks without hiring a locksmith. SmartKey continuesThe segment also includes electronic and connected locks such as Kevo® Bluetooth enabled deadbolt which turns a smart phone into a key and allows authorized users to win market share across all channels of distribution and provides opportunities for further growth. Market share gains stemming from our SmartKey products further augment our overall market share inopen their deadbolt by simply touching the residential lockset space. Also in security, we are capitalizing on the emerging trend in home automation and have developed further innovation in electronics where we utilize open-platform electronics to build scalable partnershipslock or remotely with technology and access control industry leaders.
We also offer other hardware products that include hinges, security hardware, screen and storm door products, garage door hardware, window hardware and floor protection under the Stanley and National Hardware brand names throughout the U.S. and Canada. Although theconnected devices.

The plumbing product line is largely harmonized between the brands, the dual branding approach has been utilized to protect legacy business with key customers and avoid channel conflict.

Furthermore, we providecategory includes kitchen, bath and shower faucets, as well as other plumbing products and fixtures through our Pfister brand. Pfister is recognized for bringingPfister® brand, which brings showroom styles to the mass market at affordable prices and offers a lifetime warranty on all of its products. We have combined robust customer collaboration with consumer driven research to drive innovative products that are well-received by the market. With its affordable, quick-to-market and custom designed solutions, Pfister has an established capability to effectively service hospitality and international markets. PfisterPfister® seeks to differentiate itself from the competition through its breadth of styles and finishes, along with innovations designed to meet a variety of consumer, plumber and builder needs.
Pet Supplies
In the pet supplies

The hardware product category we marketincludes hinges, security hardware, screen and storm door products, garage door hardware, window hardware and floor protection under the National Hardware® and Stanley® brand names throughout the U.S. and Canada. The product line is largely harmonized between these brands and the dual-branding approach has been utilized to protect legacy business with key customers and avoid channel conflict.

On October 1, 2014, the Company acquired privately owned Tell Manufacturing, Inc. (“Tell”), a U.S. manufacturer and distributor of commercial doors, locks and hardware. Tell provides the HHI segment with an established commercial security sales position through a well-recognized brand, along with a platform to expand our patented SmartKey® and Kevo® residential lock technologies into commercial channels. The Tell acquisition also added doors and hollow metal door manufacturing capabilities, a strategically important adjacent category.

The sales force of the HHI business is aligned by customer and geographic region. We sell a variety of leading branded pet supplies for fish, dogs, cats, birdsprimarily to large retailers, home improvement centers, hardware stores, non-retail distributors, home builders, commercial contractors, and other small domestic animals. We haveretailers.

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion of the segment’s operating results.

8


Global Pet Supplies (PET)

The following is an overview of the PET segment net sales by product category and geographic region sold (based upon destination) as a percentage of net sales for the segment for the year ended September 30, 2016:

The aquatics product category includes a broad line of consumer and commercial aquatics products, including integrated aquarium kits, stand-alone tanks and stands, aquatics equipment such as filtration systems, heaters, and pumps, and other equipment,aquatics consumables such as fish food, water treatments and water treatment products.conditioners. Our largest aquatics brands are Tetra, Marineland, Whisper, JungleTetra®, Marineland®, Whisper®, Jungle® and Instant Ocean. We also sellOcean®.

The companion animal product category includes a variety of specialty pet products including rawhide chews, dog and cat treats, small animal food and treats, clean upclean-up and training aid products, health and grooming aids, bedding products, and consumable accessories including privacy tents, litter carpets, crystal litter cartridges, charcoal filters, corn-based litter and replaceable waste receptacles. Our largest specialty pet brands include FURminator, 8-in-1, Dingo,FURminator®, 8-in-1®, Dingo®, Nature’s Miracle,Miracle®, Wild HarvestHarvest® and Littermaid.Littermaid®.

The pet food product category includes wet and dry pet food for dogs and cats under the IAMS®, Eukanuba® and 8-in-1® brand names in European markets. On December 31, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Procter & Gamble’s European pet food business, consisting of the IAMS® and Eukanuba® brands for dogs and cats. Eukanuba® is a popular brand with breeders and veterinarians in Europe; and IAMS® is a premium brand with broad customer appeal primarily in the United Kingdom with opportunities to grow further across Europe and is positioned for consumers who treat their pets as family members and view the food they feed their pets as a way to make them happy.

Additionally, on January 16, 2015, we acquired Salix Animal Health, a vertically integrated producer and distributor of natural rawhide dog chews, treats and snacks, offering a comprehensive line of chews made from beef hides, pork, chicken, beef and other various proteins. Its two flagship brands are Healthy-Hide® that is marketed across the Good’n’Fun®, Good’n’Fit®, and Good’n’Tasty® family of brands; and Digest-eeze®. Salix will provide the segment with increased optionality for low-cost global rawhide production and supply, and expand our Dingo® dog treats business with complementary product offerings.

Our PET sales force is aligned by customer type, geographic region and product category. We sell primarily to mass merchandisers, grocery stores and drug chains, pet superstores, independent pet stores, warehouse clubs and other specialty retailers. International distribution varies by region and is often executed on a country-by-country basis.

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion of the segment’s operating results.

9


Home and Garden Control Products

In(H&G)

The following is an overview of the home, lawnH&G segment net sales by product category and garden products geographic region sold (based upon destination) as a percentage of net sales for the segment for the year ended September 30, 2016:

The controls product category we currently sell and marketincludes a variety of leadingoutdoor insect and weed control solutions, and animal repellents under the brand names Spectracide®, Black Flag®, Garden Safe®, EcoLogic® and Liquid Fence®.  Our line of outdoor control solutions are designed to assist consumers in controlling insects, weeds and animals when tackling lawn and landscaping projects themselves. From selective and non-selective herbicides to pest-specific solutions, our outdoor products including are available as aerosols, granules, ready-to-use or hose-end ready-to-sprays designed to fulfill a variety of consumer needs.

The household insecticides, insect repellents, and lawn insect and weed control solutions. We offer product category includes a broad array of household pest control solutions, such as spider and scorpion killers; roach and ant killers; flying insect killers; insect foggers; wasp and hornet killers; bedbug, flea and tick control products; and roach and ant baits. We also offer powerful rodent traps and rodenticides with discreet designs that are easy to refill and reuse. Our largest brands in the household insect control and rodenticide category are Hot ShotShot® and Black Flag.

Our business segment also manufactures and markets a complete line of insect repellent products that provideFlag®.

The repellents product category includes personal use pesticides for protection from various outdoor nuisance pests, especially mosquitoes. These products include both personal repellents available in a variety of formulas (suchsuch as aerosols, lotions, pump sprays and wipes)wipes to match consumers’ dynamic needs,needs; as well as area repellents (suchsuch as yard sprays, citronella candles and patio lanterns) that letlanterns to allow consumers to enjoy the outdoors without bothersome pests. Our brands in the insect repellents category are CutterCutter® and Repel.


Repel®.

The Home and Garden business sales force is geographically aligned with our key customers. We sell primarily to home improvement centers, mass merchandisers, dollar stores, hardware stores, home and garden distributors, and food and drug retailers, primarily in the U.S.

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion of the segment’s operating results.

4

10



In addition to providing indoor pest solutions,

Global Auto Care (GAC)

The following is an overview of the GAC segment net sales by product category and geographic region sold (based upon destination) as a percentage of net sales for the segment for the year ended September 30, 2016:

We entered the GAC segment through our lineacquisition of outdoor insectArmored Auto Group (“AAG”) on May 21, 2015, which consists of products within the automotive aftermarket appearance, performance chemicals, and weed control solutions allows consumers to conquer bugsdo-it-yourself automotive air conditioner recharge product categories.

The appearance product category includes protectants, wipes, tire and weeds,wheel care products, glass cleaners, leather care products, air fresheners and tackle their biggest lawn and landscaping projects themselves. From selective and non-selective herbicides to pest-specific solutions, our outdoor products are available in easy-to-use formulations (such as aerosols, granules, ready-to-use or hose-end ready-to-sprays)washes designed to fulfillclean, shine, refresh and protect interior and exterior automobile surfaces under the brand name Armor All®. Armor All® is a variety of consumer needs. Our outdoor insecticideleader in the automotive aftermarket appearance products category based upon its recognized brand name, convenient application methods and herbicide brands include Spectracideproduct innovation.

The performance product category includes STP® branded fuel and Garden Safe.

We have positioned ourselves as the value alternative for consumers who wantoil additives, functional fluids and automotive appearance products that deliver powerfulbenefit from a rich heritage in the car enthusiast and racing scenes, characterized by a commitment to technology, performance at an exceptional value.
Electric Shaving and Grooming Products
We market and sell a broad linemotor sports partnerships for over 60 years. The strong brand equity of electric shaving and groomingSTP also provides for attractive licensing opportunities that augment our presence in our core performance categories.

The A/C recharge product category includes do-it-yourself automotive air conditioner recharge products under the RemingtonA/C PRO® brand name, including men’s rotaryalong with other refrigerant and foil shavers, beardoil recharge kits, sealants and mustache trimmers, body, noseaccessories.

The GAC business sales force is geographically aligned with key customers and ear trimmers, women’s shavers, haircut kitssupply chains. We sell primarily to big-box auto, auto specialty retail, mass retailers, food and intense pulsed light hair removal systems.

Small Appliances
We marketdrug retailers, and sellsmall regional and convenience store retailers. Our small regional and convenience store customers are serviced by brokers and distributors. International distribution varies by region and is often executed on a broad rangecountry-by-country basis.

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of productsFinancial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion of the branded small household appliances category under the George Foreman, Black & Decker, Russell Hobbs, Farberware, Juiceman, Breadmansegment’s operating results.

11


Other Information

Sales, Distribution and Toastmaster brands, including grills, bread makers, sandwich makers, kettles, toaster ovens, toasters, blenders, juicers, can openers, coffee grinders, coffeemakers, electric knives, deep fryers, food choppers, food processors, hand mixers, rice cookers and steamers. We also market small home product appliances, including hand-held irons, vacuum cleaners, air purifiers, clothes shavers and heaters, primarily under the Black & Decker and Russell Hobbs brands.

Electric Personal Care Products
Our electric personal care products, marketed and sold under the Remington, Russell Hobbs, Carmen and Andrew Collinge brand names, include hand-held dryers, curling irons, straightening irons, brush irons, hair setters, facial brushes, skin appliances, electric toothbrushes and hair accessories.
Sales and Distribution
Competition

We sell our products through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, industrial distributorsconstruction companies and OEMs. Our sales generally are made through the use of individual purchase orders, consistent with industry practice. Retail sales of the consumer products we market have been increasingly consolidated on a worldwide basis into a small number of regional and national mass merchandisers. This trend towards consolidation is occurring on a worldwide basis. As a result of this consolidation, amerchandisers and e-commerce companies that generally have strong negotiating power with their suppliers. A significant percentage of our sales are attributable to a very limited group of retailer customers, including Wal-Mart,(in alphabetical order), Amazon, Argos, Autozone, Dollar General, Lowe’s, PetCo, PetSmart, Target, The Home Depot, Lowe’s, Carrefour, Target, PetSmart, Canadian Tire, PetCo and Gigante.Wal-Mart. Our sales to our largest customer, Wal-Mart, represented approximately 1518%% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.2016. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in the fiscal year ended September 30, 20132016..

Segment information as to revenues, profit

Factors influencing product sales include brand name recognition, perceived quality, price, performance, product packaging, design innovation, and total assetsconsumer confidence and preferences as well as information concerning our revenues and long-lived assets by geographic location for the last three fiscal years is set forth in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 11, "Segment Information", in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Salescreative marketing, promotion and distribution practices in each of our reportable segments are as set forth below.
Global Batteries & Appliances
strategies. We manage our Global Batteries & Appliances sales force by geographic regioncompete for limited shelf space and consumer acceptance based on location and product group. Our sales team is divided into threesegment. We also compete with our retail customers, who use their own private label brands, and with distributors and foreign manufacturers of unbranded products, typically at lower prices. The Company addresses competitive challenges with the following factors:

·

Strong Diversified Global Brand Portfolio. We have a global portfolio of well-recognized consumer product brands. We believe that the strength of our brands positions us to extend our product lines and provide our retail customers with strong sell-through to consumers.

·

Strong Global Retail Relationships. We have well-established business relationships with many of the top global retailers, distributors and wholesalers, which have assisted us in our efforts to expand our overall market penetration and promote sales.

·

Expansive Distribution Network. We distribute our products in approximately 160 countries through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, construction companies and OEMs.

·

Innovative New Products, Packaging and Technologies. We have a long history of product and packaging innovations in each of our product categories and continually seek to introduce new products both as extensions of existing product lines and as new product categories.

·

Experienced Management Team. Our management team has substantial consumer products experience. On average, each senior management team member has more than 20 years of experience at Spectrum Brands, VARTA, Remington, Russell Hobbs or other branded consumer product companies such as Newell Brands and Honeywell.

Within our GBA segment, primary competitors for consumer batteries include Energizer Holdings, Inc. (Energizer); Berkshire Hathaway (Duracell); Matsushita (Panasonic) and private label brands of major geographic territories, Northretailers. Primary competitors for small appliances include Newell Brands (Oster, Sunbeam, Mr. Coffee, Crockpot, Rival, Breville), General Electric (GE), De’Longhi America Latin America(DeLonghi, Kenwood, Braun), SharkNinja f/k/a Euro-Pro (Shark, Ninja), NACCO Industries (Hamilton Beach, Proctor Silex), SEB S.A.(T-fal, Krups, Rowenta), Whirlpool Corporation (Kitchen Aid, Waring), Conair Corporate (Cuisinart), Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Philips), Glen Dimplex (Morphy Richards) and Europeprivate label brands for major retailers. Primary competitors in personal care include are Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Norelco), The Procter & Gamble Company (Braun), Conair Corporation, Wahl Clipper Corporation and Helen of Troy Limited.

Within our HHI segment, primary competitors in residential locksets include Allegion (Schlage) and private label import brands such as Defiant. Primary competitors for hardware include The Hillman Group, Hampton Hardware, Crown Bolt and private label competitors. Primary competitors for plumbing include Kohler, Masco, Fortune Brands (Moen), American Standard, Glacier Bay, AquaSource, and the restprivate label brands of the world (“Europe/ROW”). Within each major geographic territory, we have additional subdivisions designed to meetretailers.

Primary competitors in our customers’ needs.

PET segment are Mars Corporation, The Hartz Mountain Corporation and Central Garden & Pet Company which all sell a comprehensive line of pet supplies that compete across our product categories. The pet supplies product category is highly fragmented with no competitor holding a substantial market share and consists of small companies with limited product lines.

Primary competitors in our H&G segment are The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (Scotts, Ortho, Roundup, Miracle-Gro, Tomcat); Central Garden & Pet (AMDRO, Sevin) and Bayer A.G. (Bayer Advanced), S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (Raid, OFF!); and Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Combat).

Primary competitors in our GAC segment include Valvoline, Prestone, Turtle Wax, Black Magic, Energizer, Newell Brands and private label brands. We manage our sales force in North Americaalso encounter competition from similar and alternative products, many of which are produced and marketed by distribution channel. We maintain separate sales groups to service (i) our retail salesmajor multinational or national companies, including Mothers, Meguiars, Lucas, and distribution channel, (ii) our hearing aid professionals channel and (iii) our industrial distributors and OEM sales and distribution channel. In addition, we utilize a network of independent brokers to service participants in selected distribution channels.

Sea Foam.

We manage our sales force in Latin America by distribution channel and geographic territory. We sell primarily to large retailers, wholesalers, distributors, food and drug chains and retail outlets. In countries where we do not maintain a sales force, we sell to distributors who market our products through all channels in the market.

5

12



The

Seasonality

On a consolidated basis our financial results are approximately equally weighted across our quarters, however, sales force servingof certain product categories tend to be seasonal. Sales from our GBA segment, primarily from consumer battery and electric personal care product categories tend to increase during the December holiday season (the Company’s first fiscal quarter), while small appliances sales increase from July through December primarily due to the increased demand by customers in Europe/ROW is supplemented by an international networkthe late summer for “back-to-school” sales (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter) and in December for the holiday season. Sales from our HHI segment primarily increase during the spring and summer construction period (the Company’s third and fourth fiscal quarters). Sales from our PET segment remain fairly consistent throughout the year with little variation. Sales from our H&G segment and GAC segment typically peak during the first six months of distributorsthe calendar year (the Company’s second and third fiscal quarters) due to promote the salecustomer seasonal purchasing patterns and timing of our products.promotional activities. Our sales operations throughout Europe/ROW are organized by geographic territoryquarter as a percentage of annual net sales during the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and the following sales channels: (i) food/retail, which includes mass merchandisers, discounters and drug and food stores; (ii) specialty trade, which includes clubs, consumer electronics stores, department stores, photography stores and wholesalers/distributors; and (iii) industrial, government, hearing aid professionals and OEMs.


Global Pet Supplies
Our Global Pet Supplies sales force2014 is aligned by customer, geographic region and product group. We sell pet supply products to mass merchandisers, grocery and drug chains, pet superstores, independent pet stores and other retailers.as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

First Quarter

 

 

24% 

 

 

23% 

 

 

25% 

Second Quarter

 

 

24% 

 

 

23% 

 

 

23% 

Third Quarter

 

 

27% 

 

 

26% 

 

 

25% 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

25% 

 

 

28% 

 

 

27% 
Home and Garden Business
The sales force of the Home and Garden Business is geographically aligned with our key customers. We sell primarily to home improvement centers, mass merchandisers, dollar stores, hardware stores, home and garden distributors, and food and drug retailers in the U.S.
Hardware & Home Improvement
The sales force of the Hardware & Home Improvement is aligned by customer and geographic region. We sell primarily to large retailers, non-retail distributors, home improvement centers, hardware stores, home builders and other retailers.

Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Suppliers

The principal raw materials used in manufacturing our products—include zinc, electrolytic manganese dioxide used in our consumer batteries products; brass and steel—steel used in our HHI products; and refrigerant R-134a used in our GAC A/C recharge products; that are sourced either on a global or regional basis. The prices of these raw materials are susceptible to price fluctuations due to supply and demand trends, energy costs, transportation costs, government regulations and tariffs, changes in currency exchange rates, price controls, general economic conditions and other unforeseen circumstances. We have regularly engaged in forward purchase and hedging derivative transactions in an attempt to effectively manage thecertain raw material costs we expect to incur over the next 12 to 24 months.

Substantially all of our rechargeable batteries and chargers, portable lighting products, hair care and other personal care products and our electric shaving and grooming products and small appliances are manufactured by third party suppliers that are primarily located in the Asia/PacificAsia-Pacific region. We maintain ownership of most of the tooling and molds used by our suppliers.

We continually evaluate our manufacturing facilities’ capacity and related utilization. As a result of such analyses, we have closed a number of manufacturing facilities during the past five years. In general, we believe our existing facilities are adequate for our present and foreseeable needs.

Research

Patents and Development

Our researchTrademarks

We use and development strategy is focused on new product development and performance enhancementsmaintain a number of our existing products. We plan to continue to use our strongpatents, trademarks, brand names established customer relationships and trade names that are, in the aggregate, important to our businesses. We seek trademark protection in the U.S. and in foreign countries. The Company’s most significant research and development efforts to introduce innovative products that offer enhanced value to consumers through new designs and improved functionality.registered trademarks are:

Segment

Trademarks

GBA

Rayovac®, VARTA®, Remington®, Black & Decker®, George Foreman®, Russell Hobbs®, Farberware®, Toastmaster®, Breadman®, Juiceman®

HHI

Kwikset®, Weiser®, Baldwin®, National Hardware®, Stanley®, Fanal®, Pfister®, Tell®

PET

Tetra®, 8-in-1®, Dingo®, Nature’s Miracle®, Wild Harvest®, Marineland®, Furminator®, Littermaid®, Birdola®, Healthy Hide®, Digest-eeze®, Iams®, Eukanuba®

H&G

Spectracide®, Cutter®, Hot Shot®, Real Kill®, Ultra Kill®, Black Flag®, Liquid Fence®, Rid-a-bug®, TAT®, Garden Safe®, Repel®

GAC

Armor All®, STP®, A/C PRO®

In our fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we invested $43.3 million, $33.1 million and $32.9 million, respectively, in product research and development.
Patents and Trademarks

We own or license from third parties a significant number of patents and patent applications throughout the world relating to products we sell and manufacturing equipment we use. We hold a license that expires in March 2022 for certain alkaline battery designs, technology and manufacturing equipment from Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Matsushita”), to whom we pay a royalty.

We also use and maintain a number of trademarks Through our 56% ownership interest in Shaser, Inc., we have patented technology that is used in our business, including RAYOVAC, REMINGTON, VARTA, TETRA, 8IN1, DINGO, NATURE’S MIRACLE, WILD HARVEST, MARINELAND, FURMINATOR, SPECTRACIDE, CUTTER, HOT SHOT, GARDEN SAFE, REPEL, GEORGE FOREMAN, RUSSELL HOBBS, BLACK & DECKER, KWIKSET, WEISER, BALDWIN, NATIONAL HARDWARE, FANAL AND PFISTER. We seek trademark protection ini-Light and i-Light Reveal product line. Through ownership of our HHI segment, we own the U.S. and in foreign countries by all available means, including registration.

patented SmartKey®  technology, which enables customers to easily rekey their locks without hiring a locksmith.

6

13



As a result of

We acquired the October 2002 sale by VARTA AG of substantially all of its consumer battery business to us and VARTA AG’s subsequent sale of its automotive battery business to Johnson Controls, Inc. (“Johnson Controls”), we acquired rights to the VARTAVARTA® trademark in the consumer battery category and Johnson Controls Inc. acquired rights to the trademark in the automotive battery category.category from VARTA AG. VARTA AG continues to have rights to use the trademark with travel guides and industrial batteries and VARTA Microbattery GmbH has the right to use the trade marktrademark with micro batteries. We are party to a Trademark and Domain Names Protection and Delimitation Agreement that governs ownership and usage rights and obligations of the parties relative to the VARTA ® trademark.

As a result of the common origins of the Remington Products, L.L.C. (“Remington Products”) business we acquired in September 2003 and the Remington Arms Company, Inc. (“Remington Arms”), the REMINGTON trademark is owned by us and by Remington Arms each with respect to its principal products as well as associated products. Accordingly, we own the rights to use the REMINGTON trademark for electric shavers, shaver accessories, grooming products and personal care products, while Remington Arms owns the rights to use the trademark for firearms, sporting goods and products for industrial use, including industrial hand tools. In addition, the terms of a 1986 agreement between Remington Products and Remington Arms provides for the shared rights to use the REMINGTON trademark on products which are not considered “principal products of interest” for either company. We retain the REMINGTON trademark for nearly all products which we believe can benefit from the use of the brand name in our distribution channels.

We license the Black & DeckerDecker® brand in North America, Latin America (excluding Brazil) and the Caribbean for four core categories of household appliances: beverage products, food preparation products, garment care products and cooking products. Russell Hobbs has licensed the Black & Decker brand since 1998 for use in marketing various household small appliances. In July 2011, Russell Hobbs andproducts through a trademark license agreement with The Black &and Decker Corporation (“BDC”) extended the trademark license agreement for a fourth time through December 2015.2018. Under the agreement, as extended, Russell HobbsSpectrum agreed to pay BDC royalties based on a percentage of sales, with minimum annual royalty payments of $15.0 million from calendar year 2011 through calendar year 2015.2018. The agreement also requires us to comply with maximum annual return rates for products.

If BDC does not agree to renew the license agreement, we have 18 months to transition out of the brand name. Noname with no minimum royalty payments will be due during such transition period.period and BDC has agreed to not to compete in the four core product categories for a period of five years after the end of the transition period following termination of the license agreement.period. Upon request, BDC may elect to extend the license to use the Black & Decker brand to certain additional product categories. BDC has approved several extensions of the license to additional categories and geographies.
Through the Hardware Acquisition, we

We own the patented SmartKey technology,rights to use the Remington® trademark for electric shavers, shaver accessories, grooming products and personal care products; and Remington Arms Company, Inc. (“Remington Arms”) owns the rights to use the trademark for firearms, sporting goods and products for industrial use, including industrial hand tools. The terms of a 1986 agreement between Remington Products, LLC and Remington Arms provides for the shared rights to use the trademark on products which enables customers to easily rekey their locks without hiring a locksmith.

On November 8, 2012,are not considered “principal products of interest” for either company. We retain the trademark for nearly all products which we acquired a 56% interest in Shaser Biosciences, Inc. Through this acquisition we acquired patented technology that is usedbelieve can benefit from the use of the brand name in our i-Light product line.
Competition
In our retail markets, we competedistribution channels.

We license the Stanley® and Black & Decker® marks and logos in the HHI segment for limited shelf spacesuch products as residential locksets, builder’s hardware, padlocks, and consumer acceptance. Factors influencing product sales include brand name recognition, perceived quality, price, performance, product packaging, design innovation,door hardware through a transitional trademark license agreement with Stanley Black & Decker Corporation. Under the agreement and consumer confidence and preferences as well as creative marketing, promotion and distribution strategies.

The battery product category is highly competitive. Most consumer batteries manufactured throughout the world are sold by one of four global companies: Spectrum Brands (manufacturer/seller of Rayovac and VARTA brands); Energizer Holdings, Inc. (“Energizer”) (manufacturer/sellerpart of the Energizer brand); The Procter & Gamble Company (“Procter & Gamble”) (manufacturer/selleracquisition of the Duracell brand);HHI Business in December 2012, Spectrum has a royalty-free, fully paid license to use certain trademarks, brand names and Matsushita (manufacturer/sellerlogos in marketing our products and services for five years after the completion of the Panasonic brand). We also face competition from the private label brands of major retailers, particularly in Europe. The offering of private-label batteries by retailers may create pricing pressure in the consumer battery market. Typically, private-label brands are not supported by advertising or promotion, and retailers sell these private label offerings at prices below competing name-brands. The main barriers to entry for new competitors are investment in technology research, cost of building manufacturing capacity and the expense of building retail distribution channels and consumer brands.
In the U.S. alkaline battery category, the Rayovac brand is positioned as a value brand, which is typically defined as a product that offers comparable performance at a lower price. In Europe, the VARTA brand is competitively priced with other premium brands. In Latin America, where zinc carbon batteries outsell alkaline batteries, the Rayovac brand is competitively priced. Our primary competitors in the portable lighting product category are Energizer and Mag Instrument, Inc.
Competition within the hardware and home improvement industry varies based on location and product segment. The main source of competition for residential locksets includes other third party manufacturers such as Schlage, a division of

7


Ingersoll-Rand, and private label import brands such as Defiant and Gatehouse. Major competitors for hardware include The Hillman Group, Hampton Hardware, Crown Bolt and private label competitors. In plumbing, Pfister’s major U.S. competitors are Masco, Fortune Brands, Kohler, and American Standard, as well as Glacier Bay and AquaSource, The Home Depot and Lowe’s private label brands, respectively.
The pet supplies product category is highly fragmented with over 500 manufacturers in the U.S. alone, consisting primarily of small companies with limited product lines. Our largest competitors in this product category are Mars Corporation (“Mars”), The Hartz Mountain Corporation (“Hartz”) and Central Garden & Pet Company (“Central Garden & Pet”). Both Hartz and Central Garden & Pet sell a comprehensive line of pet supplies and compete with a majorityHHI Business acquisition. Upon termination of the products we offer. Mars sells primarily aquatics products.
Products we sell inagreement, HHI will be obligated to discontinue any and all use of the hometrademarks as designated by the arrangement within 180 days following the termination.

Research and gardenDevelopment

Our research and development strategy is focused on new product category face competition from The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (“Scotts Company”), which markets lawndevelopment and garden products under the Scotts, Ortho, Roundup, Miracle-Gro, and Tomcat brand names; Central Garden & Pet, which markets garden products under the AMDRO and Sevin brand names; and Bayer A.G., which markets home and garden products under the Bayer Advanced brand name.

Products we sell in the household insect control product category face competition from S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (“S.C. Johnson”), which markets insecticide and repellent products under the Raid and OFF! brands; Scotts Company, which markets household insect control products under the Ortho brand; and Henkel KGaA, which markets insect control products under the Combat brand.
Our primary competitors in the electric shaving and grooming product category are Norelco, a division of Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV (“Philips”), which sells and markets rotary shavers, and Braun, a division of Procter & Gamble, which sells and markets foil shavers. Through our Remington brand, we sell both foil and rotary shavers.
Primary competitive brands in the small appliance category include Hamilton Beach, Proctor Silex, Sunbeam, Mr. Coffee, Oster, General Electric, Rowenta, DeLonghi, Kitchen Aid, Cuisinart, Krups, Braun, Rival, Europro, Kenwood, Philips, Morphy Richards, Breville and Tefal. The key competitors of Russell Hobbs in this market in the U.S. and Canada include Jarden Corporation, DeLonghi America, Euro-Pro Operating LLC, Metro Thebe, Inc., d/b/a HWI Breville, NACCO Industries, Inc. (Hamilton Beach) and SEB S.A. In addition, Russell Hobbs competes with retailers who use their own private label brands for household appliances (for example, Wal-Mart).

Our major competitors in the electric personal care product category are Conair Corporation, Wahl Clipper Corporation and Helen of Troy Limited (“Helen of Troy”).
Someperformance enhancements of our major competitors have greater resources and greater overall market share than we do. They have committed significant resourcesexisting products. We plan to protect their market shares or to capture market share from us and may continue to do souse our strong brand names, established customer relationships and significant research and development efforts to introduce innovative products that offer enhanced value to consumers through new designs and improved functionality. During the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we invested $58.7 million, $51.3 million and $47.9 million, respectively, in the future. In some key product lines, our competitors may have lower production costsresearch and higher profit margins than we do, which may enable them to compete more aggressively in advertising and in offering retail discounts and other promotional incentives to retailers, distributors, wholesalers and, ultimately, consumers.
Seasonality
On a consolidated basis our financial results are approximately equally weighted between quarters, however, sales of certain product categories tend to be seasonal. Sales in the consumer battery, electric shaving and grooming and electric personal care product categories, particularly in North America, tend to be concentrated in the December holiday season (Spectrum’s first fiscal quarter). Demand for hardware and home improvement products increases during the spring and summer construction period (Spectrum's third and fourth fiscal quarters). Demand for pet supplies products remains fairly constant throughout the year. Demand for home and garden control products sold though the Home and Garden Business typically peaks during the first six months of the calendar year (Spectrum’s second and third fiscal quarters). Small Appliances peaks from July through December primarily due to the increased demand by customers in the late summer for “back-to-school” sales and in the fall for the holiday season. For a more detailed discussion of the seasonality of our product sales, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—“Seasonal Product Sales.”

8


development.

Governmental Regulations and Environmental Matters

Due to the nature of our operations, our facilities are subject to a broad range of federal, state, local and foreign legal and regulatory provisions relating to the environment, including those regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous substances and wastes and the remediation of contamination associated with the releases of hazardous substances at our facilities. We believe that compliance with the federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations to which we are subject will not have a material effect upon our capital expenditures, financial condition, earnings or competitive position.

From time to time, we have been required to address the effect of historic activities on the environmental condition of our properties. We have not conducted invasive testing at all facilities to identify all potential environmental liability risks. Given the age of our facilities and the nature of our operations, it is possible that material liabilities may arise in the future in connection with our current or former facilities. If previously unknown contamination of property underlying or in the vicinity of our manufacturing facilities is discovered, we could incur material unforeseen expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position. Although we are currently engaged in investigative or remedial projects at some of our facilities, we do not expect that such projects, taking into account established accruals, will cause us to incur expenditures that are material to our business, financial condition or results of operations; however, it is possible that our future liability could be material.

14


We have been, and in the future may be, subject to proceedings related to our disposal of industrial and hazardous material at off-site disposal locations or similar disposals made by other parties for which we are held responsible as a result of our relationships with such other parties. In the U.S., these proceedings are under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”) or similar state laws that hold persons who “arranged for” the disposal or treatment of such substances strictly liable for costs incurred in responding to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances from such sites, regardless of fault or the lawfulness of the original disposal. Liability under CERCLA is typically joint and several, meaning that a liable party may be responsible for all costs incurred in investigating and remediating contamination at a site. As a practical matter, liability at CERCLA sites is shared by all of the viable responsible parties. We occasionally are identified by federal or state governmental agencies as being a potentially responsible party for response actions contemplated at an off-site facility. At the existing sites where we have been notified of our status as a potentially responsible party, it is either premature to determine whether our potential liability, if any, will be material or we do not believe that our liability, if any, will be material. We may be named as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA or similar state laws for other sites not currently known to us, and the costs and liabilities associated with these sites may be material.

It is difficult to quantify with certainty the potential financial impact of actions regarding expenditures for environmental matters, particularly remediation, and future capital expenditures for environmental control equipment. Nevertheless, based upon the information currently available, we believe that our ultimate liability arising from such environmental matters, taking into accountconsidering established accruals of $5.1$4.4 million for estimated liabilities at September 30, 20132016 should not be material to our business or financial condition.


Electronic and electrical products that we sell in Europe, particularly products sold under the RemingtonRemington® brand name, VARTAVARTA® battery chargers, certain portable lighting and all of our batteries, are subject to regulation in European Union (“EU”) markets under three key EU directives. The first directive is the Restriction of the Use of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“RoHS”) which took effect in EU member states beginning July 1, 2006. RoHS prohibits companies from selling products which contain certain specified hazardous materials in EU member states. We believe that compliance with RoHS willdoes not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, financial condition, earnings or competitive position. The second directive is entitled the Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE”). WEEE makes producers or importers of particular classes of electrical goods financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products. WEEE assigns levels of responsibility to companies doing business in EU markets based on their relative market share. WEEE calls on each EU member state to enact enabling legislation to implement the directive. To comply with WEEE requirements, we have partnered with other companies to create a comprehensive collection, treatment, disposal and recycling program. As EU member states pass enabling legislation we currently expect our compliance system to be sufficient to meet such requirements. Our current estimated costs associated with compliance with WEEE are not significant based on our current market share. However, we continue to evaluate the impact of the WEEE legislation as EU member states implement guidance and as our market share changes and, as a result, actual costs to our company could differ from our current estimates and may be material to our business, financial condition or results of operations. The third directive is the Directive on Batteries and Accumulators and Waste Batteries, which was adopted in September 2006 and went into effect in September 2008 (the “Battery Directive”). The Battery Directive bans heavy metals in batteries by establishing maximum quantities of those heavy metals in batteries and mandates waste management of batteries, including collection, recycling and disposal systems. The Battery Directive places the costs of such waste management systems on producers and importers of batteries. The Battery Directive calls on each EU member state to enact enabling legislation to implement the directive. We currently believe


9


that compliance with the Battery Directive willdoes not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, financial condition, earnings or competitive position. However, until such time as the EU member states adopthave adopted enabling legislation a full evaluation of these costs cannot be completed.required by the directive and issued additional guidance. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the Battery Directive and its enabling legislation as EU member states implement guidance.
legislation.

Certain of our products and facilities in each of our business segments are regulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) or other federal consumer protection and product safety agencies and are subject to the regulations such agencies enforce, as well as by similar state, foreign and multinational agencies and regulations. For example, in the U.S., all products containing pesticides must be registered with the EPA and, in many cases, similar state and foreign agencies before they can be manufactured or sold. Our inability to obtain or the cancellation of any registration could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The severity of the effect would depend on which products were involved, whether another product could be substituted and whether our competitors were similarly affected. We attempt to anticipate regulatory developments and maintain registrations of, and access to, substitute chemicals and other ingredients. We may not always be able to avoid or minimize these risks.

The Food Quality Protection Act (“FQPA”) established a standard for food-use pesticides, which is that a reasonable certainty of no harm will result from the cumulative effect of pesticide exposures. Under the FQPA, the EPA is evaluating the cumulative effects from dietary and non-dietary exposures to pesticides. The pesticides in certain of our products continue to be evaluated by the EPA as part of this program. It is possible that the EPA or a third party active ingredient registrant may decide that a pesticide we use in our products will be limited or made unavailable to us. We cannot predict the outcome or the severity of the effect of the EPA’s continuing evaluations of active ingredients used in our products.

15


Certain of our products and packaging materials are subject to regulations administered by the FDA. Among other things, the FDA enforces statutory prohibitions against misbranded and adulterated products, establishes ingredients and manufacturing procedures for certain products, establishes standards of identity for certain products, determines the safety of products and establishes labeling standards and requirements. In addition, various states regulate these products by enforcing federal and state standards of identity for selected products, grading products, inspecting production facilities and imposing their own labeling requirements.

Employees

Certain A/C products containing R-134a are subject to regulation in the U.S. markets under the EPA’s Significant New Alternative Policy ("SNAP Program"), which implements international agreements restricting the use of certain refrigerants. The EPA has identified use of R-134a in new automotive air conditioning systems as an approved use up to the 2020 automotive model year. The EPA has not yet approved a replacement refrigerant under the SNAP program for sale in small cans for automotive use for automobiles produced beginning with the 2021 model year, and future rulemakings from the agency are anticipated. We hadcurrently believe that compliance with current and future SNAP regulations will not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, financial condition, earnings or competitive position. However, until such time as future regulations are issued and future alternate refrigerants are approved for sale in small cans, a full evaluation of these costs cannot be completed. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the SNAP Program as the EPA issues additional guidance.

Employees

We have approximately 13,50015,700 full-time employees worldwide as of September 30, 2013.2016. Approximately 16%14% of our total labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. There are 45 collective bargaining agreements that will expire during our fiscal year ending September 30, 2014,2017, which cover approximately 57%38% of the labor force under collective bargaining agreements, or approximately 9%5% of our total labor force. We believe that our overall relationship with our employees is good.

16



Available Information
Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d)

Table of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are made available free of charge on or through our website at Contents

ITEM 1A.www.spectrumbrands.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with, or furnished to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains our reports, proxy statements and other information at www.sec.gov . In addition, copies of our (i) Corporate Governance Guidelines, (ii) charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, (iii) Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and (iv) Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers are available at our Internet site at www.spectrumbrands.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.” Copies will also be provided to any stockholder upon written request to the Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Communications, Spectrum Brands, Inc. at 3001 Deming Way, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 or via electronic mail at investorrelations@spectrumbrands.com, or by contacting the Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Communications by telephone at (608) 275-3340.


ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTORS

Any of the following factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and theoperations. The risks described below are not the only risks that we may face. Additional risks and uncertainties not


10


currently known to us or that we currently view as immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Related To Our Business
We are a parent company and our primary source of cash is and will be distributions from our subsidiaries.
We are a parent company with limited business operations of our own. Our main asset is the capital stock of our subsidiaries. We conduct most of our business operations through our direct and indirect subsidiaries. Accordingly, our primary sources of cash are dividends and distributions with respect to our ownership interests in our subsidiaries that are derived from their earnings and cash flow. Our subsidiaries might not generate sufficient earnings and cash flow to pay dividends or distributions in the future. Our subsidiaries' payments to us will be contingent upon their earnings and upon other business considerations. In addition, our senior credit facilities, the indentures governing our notes and other agreements limit or prohibit certain payments of dividends or other distributions to us. We expect that our future credit facilities and financing arrangements will contain similar restrictions.

Our substantial indebtedness may limit our financial and operating flexibility, and we may incur additional debt, which could increase the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.

We have, and we expect to continue to have, a significant amount of indebtedness. As of September 30, 2013,2016, we had total indebtedness under our Term Loan and ABL Facility (together the "Senior Secured Facilities"), the 6.375% Notes, the 6.625% Notes, the 6.75% Notes (collectively, the "Notes")senior secured facilities, notes and other debt instruments of approximately $3 billion.$3.7 billion. Our substantial indebtedness has had, and could continue to have, material adverse consequences for our business, and may:

·

require us to dedicate a large portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness, which will reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development expenditures and other business activities;

require us to dedicate a large portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness, which will reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development expenditures and other business activities;

·

increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

·

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

·

restrict our ability to make strategic acquisitions, dispositions or to exploit business opportunities;

restrict our ability to make strategic acquisitions, dispositions or to exploit business opportunities;

·

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and

·

limit our ability to borrow additional funds (even when necessary to maintain adequate liquidity) or dispose of assets.

limit our ability to borrow additional funds (even when necessary to maintain adequate liquidity) or dispose of assets.

Under the Senior Secured Facilitiessenior secured facilities and the indentures governing the Notesnotes (together, the “Indentures”), we may incur additional indebtedness. If new debt is added to our existing debt levels, the related risks that we now face would increase.

Furthermore, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at variable rates. If market interest rates increase, the interest rate on our variable rate debt will increase and will create higher debt service requirements, which would adversely affect our cash flow and could adversely impact our results of operations. While we may enter into agreements limiting our exposure to higher debt service requirements, any such agreements may not offer complete protection from this risk.

Restrictive covenants in the Senior Secured Facilitiessenior secured facilities and the Indentures may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategies.

The Senior Secured Facilitiessenior secured facilities and the Indentures each restrict, among other things, asset dispositions, mergers and acquisitions, dividends, stock repurchases and redemptions, other restricted payments, indebtedness and preferred stock, loans and investments, liens and affiliate transactions. The Senior Secured Facilitiessenior secured facilities and the Indentures also contain customary events of default. These covenants could, among other things, limit our ability to fund future working capital and capital expenditures, engage in future acquisitions or development activities, or otherwise realize the value of our assets and opportunities fully because offully. In addition, the needsenior secured facilities and the Indentures require us to dedicate a portion of cash flow from operations to payments on debt. In addition,debt and also contain borrowing restrictions based on, among other things, our fixed charge coverage ratio. Furthermore, the Senior Secured Facilities containcredit agreement governing our senior secured facilities contains a financial covenantscovenant relating to maximum leverageleverage. Such requirements and minimum interest coverage. Such covenants could limit the flexibility of our restricted entities in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the industries in which they operate. Our ability to comply with these covenants is subject to certain events outside of our control. If we are unable to comply with these covenants, the lenders under our Senior Secured Facilitiessenior secured facilities could terminate their commitments and the lenders under our Senior Secured Facilitiessenior secured facilities or the holders of the Notesnotes could accelerate repayment of our outstanding borrowings and, in either case, we may be unable to obtain adequate refinancing of outstanding borrowings on favorable terms or at all. If we are unable to repay outstanding borrowings when due, the lenders under the Senior Secured Facilitiessenior secured facilities will also have the right to proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure the indebtedness owed to them. If our obligations under the Senior Secured Facilitiessenior secured facilities are accelerated, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full such indebtedness.

17


The sale or other disposition by HarbingerHRG Group, Inc. (“HRG”), the holder of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, to non-affiliates of a sufficient amount of the common stock of SB Holdingsthe Company would constitute a change of control under the agreements governing Spectrum Brands’the Company’s debt.


11


Harbinger Group Inc. (“HRG”)HRG owns a majority of the outstanding shares of the common stock of SB Holdings.the Company. The sale or other disposition by HRG to non-affiliates of a sufficient amount of the common stock of SB Holdingsthe Company could constitute a change of control under certain of the agreements governing Spectrum Brands'the Company's debt, including any foreclosure on or sale of SB Holdings'the Company's common stock pledged as collateral by HRG pursuant to the indenture governing HRG's 7.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2019. Under the Term Loan and the ABL Revolving Credit Facility,senior secured facilities, a change of control is an event of default and, if a change of control were to occur, Spectrum Brandsthe Company would be required to get an amendment toamend these agreementsfacilities to avoid a default. If Spectrum Brandsthe Company was unable to get such an amendment,amend these facilities, the lenders could accelerate the maturity of each of the Spectrum Brands Term Loan and the ABL Revolving Credit Facility.any outstanding debt under these facilities. In addition, under the indentures governing the Notes,Indentures, upon a change of control of SB Holdings, Spectrum Brandsthe Company, the Company is required to offer to repurchase such notes from the holders at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued interest or obtain a waiver of default from the holders of such notes. If Spectrum Brands wasthe Company were unable to make the change of control offer, or to obtain a waiver of default, it would be an event of default under the indentures that could allow holders of such notes to accelerate the maturity of the notes. See Risks Related to SB Holdings' Common Stock-The Harbinger Partiesthe risk factor entitled “HRG and HRGits significant stockholders exercise significant influence over us and their interests in our business may be different from the interests of our stockholdersstockholders” in this Form 10-K.

We face risks related to the current economic environment.

The current economic environment and related turmoil in the global financial system hasin recent years had and may continue to have an impact on our business and financial condition.

condition, and we may face additional challenges if economic and financial market conditions deteriorate in the future.

Global economic conditions have significantly impacted economic markets within certain sectors, with financial services and retail businesses being particularly impacted. Our ability to generate revenue depends significantly on discretionary consumer spending. It is difficult to predict new general economic conditions that could impact consumer and customer demand for our products or our ability to manage normal commercial relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors. The recent continuation of aA number of negative economic factors, including constraints on the supply of credit to households, uncertainty and weakness in the labor market and general consumer fears of a continuingnew economic downturn could have a negative impact on discretionary consumer spending. If the economy continues to deterioratedeteriorates or fails to further improve, our business could be negatively impacted, including as a result of reduced demand for our products or supplier or customer disruptions. Any weakness in discretionary consumer spending could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, our ability to access the capital markets may be restricted at a time when it could be necessary or beneficial to do so, which could have an impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions.

Concern

In the last few years, concern over continuing high unemployment, stagnant economic performance and government debt levels in many European Union countries has caused significant fluctuations of the Euro relative to other currencies, such as the U.S. Dollar. Criticism of excessive national debt among certain European Union countries has led to credit downgrades of the sovereign debt of several countries in the region, and uncertainty about the future status of the Euro. DestabilizationContinued weakness of the European economy could lead to a decrease in consumer confidence, which could cause reductions in discretionary spending and demand for our products. Furthermore, sovereign debt issues could also lead to further significant, and potentially longer-term, economic issues such as reduced economic growth and devaluation of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial conditions and operating results.

Moreover, risks related to the United Kingdom’s 2016 referendum to exit the European Union could exacerbate the foregoing risks and create additional uncertainty for our business. See the risk factor entitled “We face risks relating the United Kingdom’s 2016 referendum, which called for its exit from the European Union” in this form 10-K.

We depend on key personnel and may not be able to retain those employees or recruit additional qualified personnel.

We are highly dependent on the continuing efforts of our senior management team and other key personnel. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if we lose any of these persons and are unable to attract and retain qualified replacements.

18


We participate in very competitive markets and we may not be able to compete successfully, causing us to lose market share and sales.

The markets in which we participate are very competitive. In the consumer battery market, our primary competitors are Duracell (a brand of Procter & Gamble), Energizer and Panasonic (a brand of Matsushita). In the electric shaving and grooming and electric personal care product markets, our primary competitors are Braun (a brand of Procter & Gamble), Norelco (a brand of Philips), and Vidal Sassoon and Revlon (brands of Helen of Troy). In the pet supplies market, our primary competitors are Mars, Hartz and Central Garden & Pet. In the Home and Garden Business, our principal national competitors are Scotts, Central Garden & Pet and S.C. Johnson. Our principal national competitors within our small appliances product category include Jarden Corporation, DeLonghi America, Euro-Pro Operating LLC, Metro Thebe, Inc., d/b/a HWI Breville, NACCO Industries, Inc. (Hamilton Beach) and SEB S.A. In the hardware and home improvement industry, our principle competitors are Schlage, a division of Ingersoll-Rand, Masco, Fortune Brands, Kohler, and American Standard. In each of these markets, we also face competition from numerous other companies. In addition, in a number of our product lines, we compete

12


with our retail customers, who use their own private label brands, and with distributors and foreign manufacturers of unbranded products. Significant new competitors or increased competition from existing competitors may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of our operations.

We compete with our competitors for consumer acceptance and limited shelf space based upon brand name recognition, perceived product quality, price, performance, product features and enhancements, product packaging and design innovation, as well as creative marketing, promotion and distribution strategies, and new product introductions. Our ability to compete in these consumer product markets may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

·

We compete against many well-established companies that may have substantially greater financial and other resources, including personnel and research and development, and greater overall market share than us.

We compete against many well-established companies that may have substantially greater financial and other resources, including personnel and research and development, and greater overall market share than us.

·

In some key product lines, our competitors may have lower production costs and higher profit margins than us, which may enable them to compete more aggressively in offering retail discounts, rebates and other promotional incentives.

·

Technological advancements, product improvements or effective advertising campaigns by competitors may weaken consumer demand for our products.

·

Consumer purchasing behavior may shift to distribution channels, including to online retailers, where we and our customers do not have a strong presence.

·

Consumer preferences may change to lower margin products or products other than those we market.

·

We may not be successful in the introduction, marketing and manufacture of any new products or product innovations or be able to develop and introduce, in a timely manner, innovations to our existing products that satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance.

In the consumer battery product category, our primary competitors are Duracell (a brand of Berkshire Hathaway), Energizer and Panasonic (a brand of Matsushita). In the personal care product category, our primary competitors are Braun (a licensed brand of Procter & Gamble), Norelco (a brand of Philips), and Conair, Wahl, and Helen of Troy. In our PET business, our primary competitors are Central Garden & Pet, Mars and Hartz. In the H&G business, our principal national competitors are Scotts, Central Garden & Pet and S.C. Johnson. Our principal national competitors within our small appliances product category include Newell Brands, DeLonghi America, SharkNinja (f/k/a Euro-Pro Operating LLC), NACCO Industries, Inc. and SEB S.A. In the HHI business, our principal competitors are Fortune Brands, Allegion, Masco, Kohler and American Standard. In the GAC business, our primary competitors are Valvoline, Prestone, Turtle Wax, Black Magic, Energizer and store brands.

In addition, in a number of our product lines, we compete with our retail customers, who use their own private label brands, and with distributors and foreign manufacturers of unbranded products. Significant new competitors or increased competition from existing competitors may have lower production costsadversely affect our business, financial condition and higher profit margins than us, which may enable them to compete more aggressively in offering retail discounts, rebates and other promotional incentives.

Product improvements or effective advertising campaigns by competitors may weaken consumer demand forresults of our products.
Consumer purchasing behavior may shift to distribution channels where we do not have a strong presence.
Consumer preferences may change to lower margin products or products other than those we market.
We may not be successful in the introduction, marketing and manufacture of any new products or product innovations or be able to develop and introduce, in a timely manner, innovations to our existing products that satisfy customer needs or achieve market acceptance.
operations.

Some competitors may be willing to reduce prices and accept lower profit margins to compete with us. As a result of this competition, we could lose market share and sales, or be forced to reduce our prices to meet competition. If our product offerings are unable to compete successfully, our sales, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

We In addition, we may not be ableunable to realize expected benefits and synergies from future acquisitions of businesses or product lines.
We may acquire partial or full ownership in businesses or may acquire rightsimplement changes to market and distribute particularour products or linesotherwise adapt to changing consumer trends. If we are unable to respond to changing consumer trends, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We face risks relating to the United Kingdom’s 2016 referendum, which called for its exit from the European Union.

The announcement of products. The acquisition of a business or the rights to market specific products or use specific product names may involve a financial commitment by us, eitherreferendum regarding the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) membership in the formEuropean Union (“EU”) on June 23, 2016 (referred to as “Brexit”), advising for the exit of the UK from the EU, has adversely impacted global markets and foreign currencies. In particular, the value of the Pound Sterling has sharply declined as compared to the US Dollar and other currencies. This volatility in foreign currencies is expected to continue as the UK negotiates and executes its exit from the EU, but there is uncertainty over what time period this will occur. A significantly weaker Pound Sterling compared to the US Dollar could have a significant negative effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The decrease in value to the Pound Sterling and impacts across global markets and foreign currencies may influence trends in consumer confidence and discretionary spending habits, but given the lack of precedent and uncertainty, it is unclear how the implications will affect us.

The UK is expected to remain a member of the EU for some period of time and there is generally not expected to be any immediate change in either EU or UK law as a consequence of the “leave” vote. However, we can provide no assurances that such consequences will not occur. Negotiations will commence to determine the future terms of the UK relationship with the EU, including, among other things, the terms of trade between the UK and the EU. The effects of Brexit will depend on many factors, including any agreements that the UK makes to retain access to EU markets either during a transitional period or more permanently. Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the UK determines which EU laws to replace or replicate. Any of these effects of Brexit and others we cannot anticipate, could materially and adversely affect our business, business opportunities, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash or equity consideration. In the caseflows.

19


Sales of certain of our products are seasonal and may cause our operating results and working capital requirements to fluctuate.

On a consolidated basis our financial results are approximately equally weighted betweenacross our quarters, however, sales of certain product categories tend to be seasonal. Sales in thefrom our GBA segment, primarily from consumer battery electric shaving and grooming and electric personal care product categories particularly in North America, tend to be concentrated inincrease during the December holiday season (Spectrum’s(the Company’s first fiscal quarter). Demand for hardware and home improvement products increases during the spring and summer construction period (Spectrum's third and fourth fiscal quarters) and demand for pet supplies products remains fairly constant throughout the year. Demand for home and garden control products typically peaks during the first six months of the calendar year (Spectrum’s second and third fiscal quarters). Small Appliances peaks, while small appliances sales increase from July through December primarily due to the increased demand by customers in the late summer for “back-to-school” sales (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter) and in the fallDecember for the holiday season. Sales from our HHI segment primarily increase during the spring and summer construction period (the Company’s third and fourth fiscal quarters). Sales from our PET segment remain fairly consistent throughout the year with little variation. Sales from our H&G segment and GAC segment typically peak during the first six months of the calendar year (the Company’s second and third fiscal quarters) due to customer seasonal purchasing patterns and timing of promotional activities. As a result of this seasonality, our inventory and working capital needs fluctuate significantly throughout the year. In addition, orders from retailers are often made late in the period preceding the applicable peak season, making forecasting of production schedules and inventory purchases difficult. If we are unable to accurately forecast and prepare for customer orders or our working capital needs, or there is a general downturn in business or economic conditions during these periods, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to significant international business risks that could hurt our business and cause our results of operations to fluctuate.
Approximately 41% of our net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 were to customers outside of the U.S. Our pursuit of international growth opportunities may require significant investments for an extended period before returns on these investments, if any, are realized. Our international operations are subject to risks including, among others:
currency fluctuations, including, without limitation, fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the Euro, British Pound, Brazilian Real and the Mexican Peso;

13


changes in the economic conditions or consumer preferences or demand for our products in these markets;
the risk that because our brand names may not be locally recognized, we must spend significant amounts of time and money to build brand recognition without certainty that we will be successful;
labor unrest;
political and economic instability, as a result of terrorist attacks, natural disasters or otherwise;
lack of developed infrastructure;
longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in collecting accounts;
restrictions on transfers of funds;
import and export duties and quotas, as well as general transportation costs;
changes in domestic and international customs and tariffs;
changes in foreign labor laws and regulations affecting our ability to hire and retain employees;
inadequate protection of intellectual property in foreign countries;
unexpected changes in regulatory environments;
difficulty in complying with foreign law;
difficulty in obtaining distribution and support; and
adverse tax consequences.
The foregoing factors may have a material adverse effect on our ability to increase or maintain our supply of products, financial condition or results of operations.

Adverse weather conditions during our peak selling seasonseasons for our home and garden control and auto care products could have a material adverse effect on our Homehome and Garden Business.

garden business and auto care business.

Weather conditions in the U.S. have a significant impact on the timing and volume of sales of certain of our lawn and garden and household insecticide and repellent products. For example, periods of dry, hot weather can decrease insecticide sales, while periods of cold and wet weather can slow sales of herbicides. Adverse weather conditions during the first six months of the calendar year (the Company’s second and third fiscal quarters), when demand for home and garden control products typically peaks, could have a material adverse effect on our home and garden business and our financial results during such period. Weather can also influence customer behavior for our auto care products, especially with appearance and A/C recharge products, which sell best during warm, dry weather. There could be a material adverse effect on the auto care segment if the weather is cold or wet, during the spring and summer seasons when demand typically peaks.

We are subject to significant international business risks that could hurt our business and cause our results of operations to fluctuate.

Approximately 36% of our net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 were to customers outside of the U.S. Our pursuit of international growth opportunities may require significant investments for an extended period before returns on these investments, if any, are realized. Our international operations are subject to risks including, among others:

·

currency fluctuations, including, without limitation, fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the Euro, British Pound, Brazilian Real, Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar, Japanese Yen and the Mexican Peso;

·

changes in the economic conditions or consumer preferences or demand for our products in these markets;

·

the risk that because our brand names may not be locally recognized, we must spend significant amounts of time and money to build brand recognition without certainty that we will be successful;

·

labor unrest;

·

political and economic instability, as a result of war, terrorist attacks, pandemics, natural disasters or otherwise;

·

lack of developed infrastructure;

·

longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in collecting accounts;

·

restrictions on transfers of funds;

·

import and export duties and quotas, as well as general transportation costs;

·

changes in domestic and international customs and tariffs;

·

changes in foreign labor laws and regulations affecting our ability to hire and retain employees;

·

inadequate protection of intellectual property in foreign countries;

·

unexpected changes in regulatory environments;

·

difficulty in complying with foreign law; and

·

adverse tax consequences.

The foregoing factors may have a material adverse effect on our ability to increase or maintain our supply of products, financial condition or results of operations.

20


Our products utilize certain key raw materials; any significant increase in the price of, or change in supply and demand for, these raw materials could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and profits.

The principal raw materials used to produce our products—including zinc powder, brass, electrolytic manganese dioxide powder, petroleum-based plastic materials, steel, aluminum, copper and corrugated materials (for packaging)—are sourced either on a global or regional basis by us or our suppliers, and the prices of those raw materials are susceptible to price fluctuations due to supply and demand trends, energy costs, transportation costs, government regulations, duties and tariffs, changes in currency exchange rates, price controls, general economic conditions and other unforeseen circumstances. In particular, during 2011,the years 2012 and 2013, we experienced extraordinary price increases for raw materials, particularly as a result of strong demand from China. Although we may increase the prices of certain of our goods to our customers, we may not be able to pass all of these cost increases on to our customers. As a result, our margins may be adversely impacted by such cost increases. We cannot provide any assurance that our sources of supply will not be interrupted due to changes in worldwide supply of or demand for raw materials or other events that interrupt material flow, which may have an adverse effect on our profitability and results of operations.

We regularly engage in forward purchase and hedging derivative transactions in an attempt to effectively manage and stabilize some of the raw material costs we expect to incur over the next 12 to 24 months. However, our hedging positions may not be effective, or may not anticipate beneficial trends, in a particular raw material market or may, as a result of changes in our business, no longer be useful for us. In addition, for certain of the principal raw materials we use to produce our products, such as electrolytic manganese dioxide powder, there are no available effective hedging markets. If these efforts are not effective or expose us to above average costs for an extended period of time, and we are unable to pass our raw materials costs on to our customers, our future profitability may be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, with respect to transportation costs, certain modes of delivery are subject to fuel surcharges which are determined based upon the current cost of diesel fuel in relation to pre-established agreed upon costs. We may be unable to pass these fuel surcharges on to our customers, which may have an adverse effect on our profitability and results of operations.

In addition, we have exclusivity arrangements and minimum purchase requirements with certain of our suppliers for the Homehome and Garden Business,garden business, which increase our dependence upon and exposure to those suppliers. Some of those agreements include caps on the price we pay for our supplies and in certain instances, these caps have allowed us to purchase materials at below market prices. When we attempt to renew those contracts, the other parties to the contracts may not be willing to include or may limit the effect of those caps and could even attempt to impose above market prices in an effort to make up for any below market prices paid by us prior to the renewal of the agreement. Any failure to timely obtain suitable supplies at competitive prices could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


14



We may not be able to fully utilize our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards.

As of September 30, 2013,2016, we had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of approximately $1,515$759 million and $1,551state NOL tax benefits of $61 million, respectively. These net operating with capital loss carryforwards of $20 million. These NOLs expire through years ending in 2033. As of September 30, 2013, our management determined2036.  During Fiscal 2016, we concluded that it continues to bewas now more likely than not that the U.S.majority of the federal and most of the U.S. state net deferred tax asset, excluding certain indefinite-lived assets will not be realizedcreate tax benefits in the future and as such recorded a fullreleased the valuation allowance to offseton the net U.S. federaltax benefits during Fiscal 2016.

As a consequence of earlier business combinations and mostissuances of common stock, the U.S. deferred tax asset, including Spectrum Brands’ net operating loss carryforwards. In addition, Spectrum Brands hasCompany and its subsidiaries have had various changes of ownership, as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”) of 1986, as amended, (the “IRC”), that continue to subject a significant amount of Spectrum Brands’the Company’s U.S. net operating lossesNOLs and other tax attributes to certain limitations.

As of September 30, 2016, a consequence$204 million valuation allowance is still recorded on certain federal and state tax carryforwards that are expected to expire due to the ownership change limitations, capital losses, foreign tax credits, and state NOLs that we do not believe we will earn enough taxable income to utilize.

As of September 30, 2016, we estimate that approximately $460 million of the mergertotal U.S. federal NOLs with a federal tax benefit of Salton, Inc.$161 million and Applica Incorporated in December 2007 (which created Russell Hobbs), as well as earlier business combinations and issuances of common stock consummated by both companies, use of the tax benefits of Russell Hobbs’ U.S. loss carryforwards is also subject$17 million related to limitations imposed by Section 382 of the IRC. We expect that a significant portion of these carryforwards will not be available to offset future taxable income, if any. In addition, use of Russell Hobbs’ net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is dependent upon both Russell Hobbs and us achieving profitable results in the future. The Russell Hobbs’ U.S. net operating loss carryforwards were subject to a full valuation allowance at September 30, 2013.

We estimate that approximately $301 million of the Spectrum and Russell Hobbs U.S. federal net operating losses and $358 million of the Spectrum and Russell Hobbs state net operating lossesNOLs would expire unused even if the Company generates sufficient income to otherwise use all its net operating losses,NOLs, due to the limitationownership change limitations in Section 382the IRC. An additional $19 million of the IRC.
tax benefits related to capital losses and credits are expected to expire unused.

If we are unable to fully utilize our net operating losses, other than those restricted under Section 382 of the IRC, as discussed above,NOLs to offset taxable income generated in the future, our results of operationsfuture cash taxes could be materially and negatively impacted.

21


Consolidation of retailers and our dependence on a small number of key customers for a significant percentage of our sales may negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a result of consolidation of retailers and consumer trends toward national mass merchandisers, a significant percentage of our sales are attributable to a very limited group of customers. Our largest customer, Wal Mart, accounted for approximately 18%15% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.2016. As these mass merchandisers and retailers grow larger and become more sophisticated, they may demand lower pricing, special packaging or impose other requirements on product suppliers. These business demands may relate to inventory practices, logistics or other aspects of the customer-supplier relationship. Because of the importance of these key customers, demands for price reductions or promotions, reductions in their purchases, changes in their financial condition or loss of their accounts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Although we have long-established relationships with many of our customers, we do not have long-term agreements with them and purchases are generally made through the use of individual purchase orders. Any significant reduction in purchases, failure to obtain anticipated orders or delays or cancellations of orders by any of these major customers, or significant pressure to reduce prices from any of these major customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the retail industry in general, the bankruptcy of any of our customers or any of our customers ceasing operations could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability.

In addition, as

As a result of retailers maintaining tighter inventory control, we face risks related to meeting demand and storing inventory.

As a result of the desire of retailers to more closely manage inventory levels, there is a growing trend among them to purchase products on a “just-in-time” basis. Due to a number of factors, including (i) manufacturing lead-times, (ii) seasonal purchasing patterns and (iii) the potential for material price increases, we may be required to shorten our lead-time for production and more closely anticipate our retailers’ and customers’ demands, which could in the future require us to carry additional inventories and increase our working capital and related financing requirements. This may increase the cost of warehousing inventory or result in excess inventory becoming difficult to manage, unusable or obsolete. In addition, if our retailers significantly change their inventory management strategies, we may encounter difficulties in filling customer orders or in liquidating excess inventories, or may find that customers are cancelling orders or returning products, which may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Furthermore, we primarily sell branded products and a move by one or more of our large customers to sell significant quantities of private label products, which we do not produce on their behalf and which directly compete with our products, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.



15


As a result of our international operations, we face a number of risks related to exchange rates and foreign currencies.

Our international sales and certain of our expenses are transacted in foreign currencies. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013,2016, approximately 41%36% of our net sales and 55% of our operating expenses were denominated in foreign currencies. We expect that the amount of our revenues and expenses transacted in foreign currencies will increase as our Latin American, European and Asian operations grow and as a result of acquisitions in these markets and, as a result, our exposure to risks associated with foreign currencies could increase accordingly. Significant changes in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to foreign currencies will affect our cost of goods sold and our operating margins and could result in exchange losses or otherwise have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Changes in currency exchange rates may also affect our sales to, purchases from, and loans to, our subsidiaries, as well as sales to, purchases from, and bank lines of credit with, our customers, suppliers and creditors that are denominated in foreign currencies.

We source many products from China and other Asian countries. To the extent the Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”) or other currencies appreciate with respect to the U.S. dollar, we may experience fluctuations in our results of operations. Since 2005, the RMB has no longer been pegged to the U.S. dollar at a constant exchange rate and instead fluctuates versus a basket of currencies. Although the People’s Bank of China regularly interveneshas historically intervened in the foreign exchange market to prevent significant short-term fluctuations in the exchange rate, the RMB may appreciate or depreciate within a flexible peg range against the U.S. dollar in the medium to long term. Moreover, it is possible that in the future Chinese authorities may lift restrictions on fluctuations in the RMB exchange rate and lessen intervention in the foreign exchange market.

While we may enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these transactions may be limited, and we may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure to currency fluctuations. Further, we may not be successful in implementing customer pricing or other actions in an effort to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations and, thus, our results of operations may be adversely impacted.

22


A deterioration in trade relations with China could lead to a substantial increase in tariffs imposed on goods

Table of Chinese origin, which potentially could reduce demand for and sales of our products.Contents

We purchase a number of our products and supplies from suppliers located in China. China gained Permanent Normal Trade Relations (“PNTR”) with the U.S. when it acceded to the World Trade Organization (“WTO”), effective January 2002. The U.S. imposes the lowest applicable tariffs on exports from PNTR countries to the U.S. In order to maintain its WTO membership, China has agreed to several requirements, including the elimination of caps on foreign ownership of Chinese companies, lowering tariffs and publicizing its laws. China may not meet these requirements and, as a result, it may not remain a member of the WTO, and its PNTR trading status may not be maintained. If China’s WTO membership is withdrawn or if PNTR status for goods produced in China were removed, there could be a substantial increase in tariffs imposed on goods of Chinese origin entering the U.S. which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and gross margin. Furthermore, on October 11, 2011, the U.S. Senate approved a bill to impose sanctions against China for its currency valuation, although the future status of this bill is uncertain. If this or a similar bill is enacted into law, the U.S. government may impose duties on products from China and other countries found to be subsidizing their exports by undervaluing their currencies, which may increase the costs of goods produced in China, or prompt China to retaliate with other tariffs or other actions. Any such series of events could have a material negative adverse effect on our sales and gross margin.

Our international operations may expose us to risks related to compliance with the laws and regulations of foreign countries.

We are subject to three EU Directives that may have a material impact on our business: Restriction of the Use of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment;Equipment (“RUHSEEE”), Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE”) and the Directive on Batteries and Accumulators and Waste Batteries (“DBAWB”), discussed below. Restriction of the Use of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic EquipmentRUHSEEE requires us to eliminate specified hazardous materials from products we sell in EU member states. Waste of Electrical and Electronic EquipmentWEEE requires us to collect and treat, dispose of or recycle certain products we manufacture or import into the EU at our own expense. The EU Directive on Batteries and Accumulators and Waste BatteriesDBAWB bans heavy metals in batteries by establishing maximum quantities of heavy metals in batteries and mandates waste management of these batteries, including collection, recycling and disposal systems, with the costs imposed upon producers and importers such as us. The costs associated with maintaining compliance or failing to comply with the EU Directives may harm our business. For example:

·

Although contracts with our suppliers address related compliance issues, we may be unable to procure appropriate RUHSEEE-compliant material in sufficient quantity and quality and/or be able to incorporate it into our product procurement processes without compromising quality and/or harming our cost structure.

Although contracts with our suppliers address related compliance issues, we may be unable to procure appropriate Restriction of the Use of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment compliant material in sufficient quantity and quality and/or be able to incorporate it into our product procurement processes without compromising quality and/or harming our cost structure.

·

We may face excess and obsolete inventory risk related to non-compliant inventory that we may hold for which there is reduced demand, and we may need to write down the carrying value of such inventories.

We may face excess and obsolete inventory risk related to non-compliant inventory that we may hold for which there is reduced demand, and we may need to write down the carrying value of such inventories.

·

We may be unable to sell certain existing inventories of our batteries in Europe and other countries that have adopted similar regulations.


16


We may be unable to sell certain existing inventories of our batteries in Europe.

Many of the developing countries in which we operate do not have significant governmental regulation relating to environmental safety, occupational safety, employment practices or other business matters routinely regulated in the U.S. and EU or may not rigorously enforce such regulation. As these countries and their economies develop, it is possible that new regulations or increased enforcement of existing regulations may increase the expense of doing business in these countries. In addition, social legislation in many countries in which we operate may result in significantly higher expenses associated with labor costs, terminating employees or distributors and closing manufacturing facilities. Increases in our costs as a result of increased regulation, legislation or enforcement could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to adequately establish and protect our intellectual property rights, and the infringement or loss of our intellectual property rights could harm our business.

To establish and protect our intellectual property rights, we rely upon a combination of national, foreign and multi-national patent, trademark and trade secret laws, together with licenses, confidentiality agreements and other contractual arrangements. The measures that we take to protect our intellectual property rights may prove inadequate to prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating our intellectual property. We may need to resort to litigation to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights. If a competitor or collaborator files a patent application claiming technology also claimed by us, or a trademark application claiming a trademark, service mark or trade dress also used by us, in order to protect our rights, we may have to participate in expensive and time consuming opposition or interference proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or a similar foreign agency. Similarly, our intellectual property rights may be challenged by third parties or invalidated through administrative process or litigation. The costs associated with protecting intellectual property rights, including litigation costs, may be material. Furthermore, even if our intellectual property rights are not directly challenged, disputes among third parties could lead to the weakening or invalidation of our intellectual property rights, or our competitors may independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. Obtaining, protecting and defending intellectual property rights can be time consuming and expensive, and may require us to incur substantial costs, including the diversion of the time and resources of management and technical personnel.

Moreover, the laws of certain foreign countries in which we operate or may operate in the future do not protect, and the governments of certain foreign countries do not enforce, intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws and government of the U.S., which may negate our competitive or technological advantages in such markets. Also, some of the technology underlying our products is the subject of nonexclusive licenses from third parties. As a result, this technology could be made available to our competitors at any time. If we are unable to establish and then adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We license various trademarks, trade names and patents from third parties for certain of our products. These licenses generally place marketing obligations on us and require us to pay fees and royalties based on net sales or profits. Typically, these licenses may be terminated if we fail to satisfy certain minimum sales obligations or if we breach the terms of the license. The termination of these licensing arrangements could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

23


In our Global Batteries & AppliancesGBA segment, we license the use of the Black & Deckerand Decker® brand for marketing in certain small household appliances in North America, South America (excluding Brazil) and the Caribbean. In July 2011,2014, The Black &and Decker Corporation ("BDC"(“BDC”) extended the license agreement through December 2015.2018. The failure to renew the license agreement with BDC or to enter into a new agreement on acceptable terms for the period following December 2018 could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.


Additionally, in connection with our acquisition of the HHI Business, pursuant to a transitional trademark license agreement, Stanley Black and Decker granted us the right to use the Stanley® and Black and Decker® marks and logos, and certain other marks and logos, for up to five years after the completion of the acquisition in connection with certain products and services. When our right to use these trademarks, brand names and logos expires, we may not be able to maintain or enjoy comparable name recognition or status under our new brand. If we are unable to successfully manage the transition of our business to our new brand, our reputation among our customers could be adversely affected, and our revenue and profitability could decline.

Claims by third parties that we are infringing their intellectual property and other litigation could adversely affect our business.

From time to time in the past we have been subject to claims that we are infringing the intellectual property of others. We currently are the subject of such claims and it is possible that third parties will assert infringement claims against us in the future. An adverse finding against us in these or similar trademark or other intellectual property litigations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any such claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming and expensive, and may require us to incur substantial costs, including the diversion of the resources of management and technical personnel, cause product delays or require us to enter into licensing or other agreements in order to secure continued access to necessary or desirable intellectual property. If we are deemed to be infringing a third party’s intellectual property and are unable to continue using that intellectual property as we had been, our business and results of operations could be harmed if we are unable to successfully develop non-infringing alternative intellectual property on a timely basis or license non-infringing alternatives or substitutes, if any exist, on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, an


17


unfavorable ruling in intellectual property litigation could subject us to significant liability, as well as require us to cease developing, manufacturing or selling the affected products or using the affected processes or trademarks. Any significant restriction on our proprietary or licensed intellectual property that impedes our ability to develop and commercialize our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our dependence on a few suppliers and one of our U.S. facilities for certain of our products makes us vulnerable to a disruption in the supply of our products.

Although we have long-standing relationships with many of our suppliers, we generally do not have long-term contracts with them. An adverse change in any of the following could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations:

·

our ability to identify and develop relationships with qualified suppliers;

our ability to identify and develop relationships with qualified suppliers;

·

the terms and conditions upon which we purchase products from our suppliers, including applicable exchange rates, transport and other costs, our suppliers’ willingness to extend credit to us to finance our inventory purchases and other factors beyond our control;

the terms and conditions upon which we purchase products from our suppliers, including applicable exchange rates, transport and other costs, our suppliers’ willingness to extend credit to us to finance our inventory purchases and other factors beyond our control;

·

the financial condition of our suppliers;

the financial condition of our suppliers;

·

political and economic instability in the countries in which our suppliers are located, as a result of war, terrorist attacks, pandemics, natural disasters or otherwise;

political instability in the countries in which our suppliers are located;

·

our ability to import outsourced products;

our ability to import outsourced products;

·

our suppliers’ noncompliance with applicable laws, trade restrictions and tariffs; or

our suppliers’ noncompliance with applicable laws, trade restrictions and tariffs; or

·

our suppliers’ ability to manufacture and deliver outsourced products according to our standards of quality on a timely and efficient basis.

our suppliers’ ability to manufacture and deliver outsourced products according to our standards of quality on a timely and efficient basis.

If our relationship with one of our key suppliers is adversely affected, we may not be able to quickly or effectively replace such supplier and may not be able to retrieve tooling, molds or other specialized production equipment or processes used by such supplier in the manufacture of our products.

In addition, we The loss of one or more of our suppliers, a material reduction in their supply of products or provision of services to us or extended disruptions or interruptions in their operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We manufacture the majority of our foil cutting systems for our shaving product lines, using specially designed machines and proprietary cutting technology, at our Portage, Wisconsin facility. In addition, we also manufacture the majority of our residential door locks at our Subic Bay, Philippines facility. Our home and garden products are mainly manufactured from our St. Louis, Missouri, facility. Damage to this facility,these facilities, or prolonged interruption in the operations of this facilitythese facilities whether for repairs, as a result of labor difficulties or for other reasons, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to manufacture and sell our foil shaving, residential door locks and home and garden products which could in turn harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

24


We face risks related to our sales of products obtained from third-party suppliers.

We sell a significant number of products that are manufactured by third party suppliers over which we have no direct control. While we have implemented processes and procedures to try to ensure that the suppliers we use are complying with all applicable regulations, there can be no assurances that such suppliers in all instances will comply with such processes and procedures or otherwise with applicable regulations. Noncompliance could result in our marketing and distribution of contaminated, defective or dangerous products which could subject us to liabilities and could result in the imposition by governmental authorities of procedures or penalties that could restrict or eliminate our ability to purchase products from non-compliant suppliers.products. Any or all of these effects could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


In addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act includes provisions regarding certain minerals and metals, known as conflict minerals, mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. These provisions require companies to undertake due diligence procedures and report on the use of conflict minerals in its products, including products manufactured by third parties. Compliance with these provisions will cause us to incur costs to certify that our supply chain is conflict free and we may face difficulties if our suppliers are unwilling or unable to verify the source of their materials. Our ability to source these minerals and metals may also be adversely impacted. In addition, our customers may require that we provide them with a certification and our inability to do so may disqualify us as a supplier.

Class action and derivative action lawsuits and other investigations, regardless of their merits, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We and certain of our officers and directors have been named in the past, and, may be named in the future, as defendants of class action and derivative action lawsuits. In the past, we have also received requests for information from government authorities. Regardless of their subject matter or merits, class action lawsuits and other government investigations may result in significant cost to us, which may not be covered by insurance, may divert the attention of management or may otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be exposed to significant product liability claims which our insurance may not cover and which could harm our reputation.

In the ordinary course of our business, we may be named as a defendant in lawsuits involving product liability claims. In any such proceeding, plaintiffs may seek to recover large and sometimes unspecified amounts of damages, and the matters may remain unresolved for several years. Any such matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition if we are unable to successfully defend against or settle these matters or if our insurance coverage is insufficient to satisfy any judgments against us or settlements relating to these matters. Although we have product liability insurance coverage and an excess umbrella policy, our insurance policies may not provide coverage for certain, or any,


18


claims against us or may not be sufficient to cover all possible liabilities. Additionally, we do not maintain product recall insurance. We may not be able to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms, if at all, in the future. Moreover, any adverse publicity arising from claims made against us, even if the claims were not successful, could adversely affect the reputation and sales of our products. In particular, product recalls or product liability claims challenging the safety of our products may result in a decline in sales for a particular product.product and could damage the reputation or the value of the related brand. This could be true even if the claims themselves are ultimately settled for immaterial amounts. This type of adverse publicity could occur and product liability claims could be made in the future.

25


We may incur material capital and other costs due to environmental liabilities.

We are subject to a broad range of federal, state, local, foreign and multi-national laws and regulations relating to the environment. These include laws and regulations that govern:

·

discharges to the air, water and land;

discharges to the air, water and land;

·

the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous substances and wastes; and

the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous substances and wastes;

·

remediation of contamination associated with release of hazardous substances at our facilities and at off-site disposal locations.

remediation of contamination associated with release of hazardous substances at our facilities and at off-site disposal locations.

Risk of environmental liability is inherent in our business. As a result, material environmental costs may arise in the future. In particular, we may incur capital and other costs to comply with increasingly stringent environmental laws and enforcement policies, such as the EU Directives: Restriction of the Use of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment and the Directive on Batteries and Accumulators and Waste Batteries, discussed above. Our international operations may expose us to risks related to compliance with the laws and regulations of foreign countries

countries. See “Our international operations may expose us to risks related to compliance with the laws and regulations of foreign countries”  in this Form 10-K.

Moreover, there are adopted and proposed international accords and treaties, as well as federal, state and local laws and regulations, that would attempt to control or limit the causes of climate change, including the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on the environment. In the event that the U.S. government or foreign governments enact new climate change laws or regulations or make changes to existing laws or regulations, compliance with applicable laws or regulations may result in increased manufacturing costs for our products, such as by requiring investment in new pollution control equipment or changing the ways in which certain of our products are made. We may incur some of these costs directly and others may be passed on to us from our third-party suppliers. Although we believe that we are substantially in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations at our facilities, we may not always be in compliance with such laws and regulations or any new laws and regulations in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time, we have been required to address the effect of historic activities on the environmental condition of our properties or former properties. We have not conducted invasive testing at all of our facilities to identify all potential environmental liability risks. Given the age of our facilities and the nature of our operations, material liabilities may arise in the future in connection with our current or former facilities. If previously unknown contamination of property underlying or in the vicinity of our manufacturing facilities is discovered, we could be required to incur material unforeseen expenses. If this occurs, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are currently engaged in investigative or remedial projects at a few of our facilities and any liabilities arising from such investigative or remedial projects at such facilities may have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


In addition, in connection with certain business acquisitions, we have assumed, and in connection with future acquisitions may assume in the future, certain potential environmental liabilities. To the extent we have not identified such environmental liabilities or to the extent the indemnifications obtained from our counterparties are insufficient to cover such environmental liabilities, these environmental liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are also subject to proceedings related to our disposal of industrial and hazardous material at off-site disposal locations or similar disposals made by other parties for which we are responsible as a result of our relationship with such other parties. These proceedings are under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"(“CERCLA”) or similar state or foreign jurisdiction laws that hold persons who “arranged for” the disposal or treatment of such substances strictly liable for costs incurred in responding to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances from such sites, regardless of fault or the lawfulness of the original disposal. Liability under CERCLA is typically joint and several, meaning that a liable party may be responsible for all of the costs incurred in investigating and remediating contamination at a site. We occasionally are identified by federal or state governmental agencies as being a potentially responsible party for response actions contemplated at an off-site facility. At the existing sites where we have been notified of our status as a potentially responsible party, it is either premature to determine if our potential liability, if any, will be material or we do not believe that our liability, if any, will be material. We may be named as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA or similar state or foreign jurisdiction laws in the future for other sites not currently known to us, and the costs and liabilities associated with these sites may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

26


Compliance with various public health, consumer protection and other regulations applicable to our products and facilities could increase our cost of doing business and expose us to additional requirements with which we may be unable to comply.


19


Certain of our products sold through, and facilities operated under, each of our business segments are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"(“EPA”), the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"(“FDA”) or other federal consumer protection and product safety agencies and are subject to the regulations such agencies enforce, as well as by similar state, foreign and multinational agencies and regulations. For example, in the U.S., all products containing pesticides must be registered with the EPA and, in many cases, similar state and foreign agencies before they can be manufactured or sold. Our inability to obtain, or the cancellation of, any registration could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The severity of the effect would depend on which products were involved, whether another product could be substituted and whether our competitors were similarly affected. We attempt to anticipate regulatory developments and maintain registrations of, and access to, substitute chemicals and other ingredients, but we may not always be able to avoid or minimize these risks.

As a distributor of consumer products in the U.S., certain of our products are also subject to the Consumer Product Safety Act, which empowers the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (the “Consumer Commission”) to exclude from the market products that are found to be unsafe or hazardous. Under certain circumstances, the Consumer Commission could require us to repair, replace or refund the purchase price of one or more of our products, or we may voluntarily do so. Any additional repurchases or recalls of our products could be costly to us and could damage the reputation or the value of our brands. If we are required to remove, or we voluntarily remove our products from the market, our reputation or brands could be tarnished and we may have large quantities of finished products that could not be sold. Furthermore, failure to timely notify the Consumer Commission of a potential safety hazard can result in significant fines being assessed against us. Additionally, laws regulating certain consumer products exist in some states, as well as in other countries in which we sell our products, and more restrictive laws and regulations may be adopted in the future.

The Food Quality Protection Act ("FQPA"(“FQPA”) established a standard for food-use pesticides, which is that a reasonable certainty of no harm will result from the cumulative effect of pesticide exposures. Under the FQPA, the EPA is evaluating the cumulative effects from dietary and non-dietary exposures to pesticides. The pesticides in certain of our products that are sold through the Home and Garden Business continue to be evaluated by the EPA as part of this program. It is possible that the EPA or a third party active ingredient registrant may decide that a pesticide we use in our products will be limited or made unavailable to us. We cannot predict the outcome or the severity of the effect of the EPA’s continuing evaluations of active ingredients used in our products.

In addition, the use of certain pesticide products that are sold through our Home and Garden Business may, among other things, be regulated by various local, state, federal and foreign environmental and public health agencies. These regulations may require that only certified or professional users apply the product, that users post notices on properties where products have been or will be applied or that certain ingredients may not be used. Compliance with such public health regulations could increase our cost of doing business and expose us to additional requirements with which we may be unable to comply.

Any failure to comply with these laws or regulations, or the terms of applicable environmental permits, could result in us incurring substantial costs, including fines, penalties and other civil and criminal sanctions or the prohibition of sales of our pest control products. Environmental law requirements, and the enforcement thereof, change frequently, have tended to become more stringent over time and could require us to incur significant expenses.


Most federal, state and local authorities require certification by Underwriters Laboratory, Inc. (“UL”), an independent, not-for-profit corporation engaged in the testing of products for compliance with certain public safety standards, or other safety regulation certification prior to marketing electrical appliances. Foreign jurisdictions also have regulatory authorities overseeing the safety of consumer products. Our products may not meet the specifications required by these authorities. A determination that any of our products are not in compliance with these rules and regulations could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.

27


A cybersecurity breach or failure of one or more key information technology systems could have a material adverse impact on our business or reputation.

We rely extensively on information technology (IT) systems, networks and services, including internet sites, data hosting and processing facilities and tools and other hardware, software and technical applications and platforms, some of which are managed, hosted, provided and/or used by third-parties or their vendors, to assist in conducting our business.

Our IT systems have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to computer viruses or other malicious codes, unauthorized access attempts, phishing and other cyber-attacks. We continue to assess potential threats and make investments seeking to address these threats, including monitoring of networks and systems and upgrading skills, employee training and security policies for the Company and its third-party providers. However, because the techniques used in these attacks change frequently and may be difficult to detect for periods of time, we may face difficulties in anticipating and implementing adequate preventative measures. To date, we have seen no material impact on our business or operations from these attacks; however, we cannot guarantee that our security efforts will prevent breaches or breakdowns to our or our third-party providers databases or systems. If the IT systems, networks or service providers we rely upon fail to function properly, or if we or one of our third-party providers suffer a loss, significant unavailability of or disclosure of our business or stakeholder information, and our business continuity plans do not effectively address these failures on a timely basis, we may be exposed to reputational, competitive and business harm as well as litigation and regulatory action. The costs and operational consequences of responding to breaches and implementing remediation measures could be significant.

Our actual or perceived failure to adequately protect personal data could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A variety of state, national, foreign, and international laws and regulations apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal data. These privacy and data protection-related laws and regulations are evolving, with new or modified laws and regulations proposed and implemented frequently and existing laws and regulations subject to new or different interpretations. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be costly and can delay or impede the development of new products.

We historically have relied upon adherence to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Safe Harbor Privacy Principles and compliance with the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework under Directive 95/46/EC (commonly referred to as the “Data Protection Directive”) agreed to by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the EU. The U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework, which established means for legitimizing the transfer of personal data by U.S. companies from the European Economic Area, or EEA, to the U.S., recently was invalidated by a decision of the European Court of Justice (or the “ECJ”).

On July 12, 2016, the European Commission adopted the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, which provides a framework for the transfer of personal data of EU data subjects, and on May 4, 2016, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which will replace Directive 95/46/EC, was formally published. The GDPR will go into effect on May 25, 2018 and as a regulation as opposed to a directive will be directly applicable in EU member states. Among other things, the GDPR applies to data controllers and processors outside of the EU whose processing activities relate to the offering of goods or services to, or monitoring the behavior within the EU of, EU data subjects.

In light of these developments, we are reviewing our business practices and may find it necessary or desirable to make changes to our personal data handling to cause our transfer and receipt of EEA residents’ personal data to be legitimized under applicable European law. The regulation of data privacy in the EU continues to evolve, and it is not possible to predict the ultimate content, and therefore the effect, of data protection regulation over time.

Our actual or alleged failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or to protect personal data, could result in enforcement actions and significant penalties against us, which could result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, subject us to claims or other remedies and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Public perceptions that some of the products we produce and market are not safe could adversely affect us.

On occasion, customers and some current or former employees have alleged that some products failed to perform up to expectations or have caused damage or injury to individuals or property. Public perception that any of our products are not safe, whether justified or not, could impair our reputation, damage our brand names and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we rely on certain third party trademarks, brand names and logos of which we do not have exclusive use of. Public perception that any such third party trademarks, bandbrand names and logos used by us are not safe, whether justified or not, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operationsoperations.

28


If we are unable to negotiate satisfactory terms to continue existing or enter into additional collective bargaining agreements, we may experience an increased risk of labor disruptions and our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.


20


Approximately 16%14% of our total labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. There are four5 collective bargaining agreements that will expire during our fiscal year ending September 30, 2014,2016, which cover approximately 57%38% of the labor force under collective bargaining agreements, or approximately 9%5% of our total labor force. While we currently expect to negotiate continuations to the terms of these agreements, there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain terms that are satisfactory to us or otherwise to reach agreement at all with the applicable parties. In addition, in the course of our business, we may also become subject to additional collective bargaining agreements. These agreements may be on terms that are less favorable than those under our current collective bargaining agreements. Increased exposure to collective bargaining agreements, whether on terms more or less favorable than our existing collective bargaining agreements, could adversely affect the operation of our business, including through increased labor expenses. While we intend to comply with all collective bargaining agreements to which we are subject, there can be no assurances that we will be able to do so and any noncompliance could subject us to disruptions in our operations and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Significant changes in actual investment return on pension assets, discount rates and other factors could affect our results of operations, equity and pension contributions in future periods.

Our results of operations may be positively or negatively affected by the amount of income or expense we record for our defined benefit pension plans. U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires that we calculate income or expense for the plans using actuarial valuations. These valuations reflect assumptions about financial markets and other economic conditions, which may change based on changes in key economic indicators. The most significant assumptions we use to estimate pension income or expense are the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. In addition, we are required to make an annual measurement of plan assets and liabilities, which may result in a significant change to equity. Although pension expense and pension funding contributions are not directly related, key economic factors that affect pension expense would also likely affect the amount of cash we would contribute to pension plans as required under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

If our goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets or other long-term assets become impaired, we will be required to record additional impairment charges, which may be significant.

A significant portion of our long-term assets consist of goodwill, other indefinite-lived intangible assets and finite-lived intangible assets recorded as a result of past acquisitions as well as through fresh start reporting. We do not amortize goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, but rather review them for impairment on a periodic basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. We consider whether circumstances or conditions exist which suggest that the carrying value of our goodwill and other long-lived intangible assets might be impaired. If such circumstances or conditions exist, further steps are required in order to determine whether the carrying value of each of the individual assets exceeds its fair value. If analysis indicates that an individual asset’s carrying value does exceed its fair value, the next step is to record a loss equal to the excess of the individual asset’s carrying value over its fair value.

The steps required by GAAP entail significant amounts of judgment and subjectivity. Events and changes in circumstances that may indicate that there may be an impairment and which may indicate that interim impairment testing is necessary include, but are not limited to: strategic decisions to exit a business or dispose of an asset made in response to changes in economic, political and competitive conditions; the impact of the economic environment on the customer base and on broad market conditions that drive valuation considerations by market participants; our internal expectations with regard to future revenue growth and the assumptions we make when performing impairment reviews; a significant decrease in the market price of our assets; a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which our assets are used; a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business climate that could affect our assets; an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset; and significant changes in the cash flows associated with an asset. As a result of such circumstances, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets or other long-term assets is determined. Any such impairment charges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

29


If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how, the value of our technology, products and services could be harmed significantly.

We rely on trade secrets, know-how and other proprietary information in operating our business. If this information is not adequately protected, then it may be disclosed or used in an unauthorized manner. To the extent that consultants, key employees or other third parties apply technological information independently developed by them or by others to our proposed products, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to such information, which may not be resolved in our favor. The risk that other parties may breach confidentiality agreements or that our trade secrets become known or independently discovered by


21


competitors, could harm us by enabling our competitors, who may have greater experience and financial resources, to copy or use our trade secrets and other proprietary information in the advancement of their products, methods or technologies. The disclosure of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position, thereby weakening demand for our products or services and harming our ability to maintain or increase our customer base.

Disruption or failures of our information technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our information technology systems are susceptible to security breaches, operational data loss, general disruptions in functionality, and may not be compatible with new technology. We depend on our information technology systems for the effectiveness of our operations and to interface with our customers, as well as to maintain financial records and accuracy. Disruption or failures of our information technology systems could impair our ability to effectively and timely provide our services and products and maintain our financial records, which could damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related

Our acquisition and expansion strategy may not be successful.

Our growth strategy is based in part on growth through acquisitions, which poses a number of risks. We may not be successful in identifying appropriate acquisition candidates, consummating acquisitions on satisfactory terms or integrating any newly acquired or expanded business with our current operations. We may issue additional equity, incur long-term or short-term indebtedness, spend cash or use a combination of these for all or part of the consideration paid in future acquisitions or expansion of our operations. The execution of our acquisition and expansion strategy could entail repositioning or similar actions that in turn require us to the Hardware Acquisition

record impairments, restructuring and other charges. Any such charges would reduce our earnings. We cannot guarantee that any future business acquisitions will be pursued or that any acquisitions that are pursued will be consummated.

Significant costs have been incurred in connection with the consummation of the Hardware Acquisition and are expected to be incurred in connection with the consummation of recent and future business acquisitions and the integration of such acquired businesses with Spectrum and the HHI Business into a combined company, including legal, accounting, financial advisory and other costs.

We expect to incur one-time costs in connection with integrating theour operations, products and personnel and those of Spectrum and the HHI Business and TLM Taiwan acquired from Stanley Black & Deckerbusinesses we acquire into a combined company, in addition to costs related directly to completing the Hardware Acquisition described below.such acquisitions. We would expect similar costs to be incurred with any future acquisition. These costs may include costsexpenditures for:

·

employee redeployment, relocation or severance;

employee redeployment, relocation or severance;

·

integration of operations and information systems;

integration of information systems;

·

combination of research and development teams and processes; and

combination of research and development teams and processes; and

·

reorganization or closures of facilities.

reorganization or closures of facilities.

In addition, we expect to incur a number of non-recurring costs associated with combining our operations with those of the HHI Business.acquired businesses. Additional unanticipated costs may yet be incurred as we integrate our business with the HHI Business.acquired businesses. Although we expect that the elimination of duplicative costs, as well as the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of our operations with those of the HHI Business,acquired businesses, may offset incremental transaction and transaction-related costs over time, this net benefit may not be achieved in the near term. Additionally, while we expect to benefit from leveraging distribution channels and brand names across both companies,among the Company and the businesses we acquire, we cannot assure you that we will achieve such benefits.

30


We may not realize the anticipated benefits of, the Hardware Acquisitionand synergies from, our business acquisitions and may become responsible for certain liabilities.

The Hardware Acquisition involvesliabilities and integration costs as a result.

Business acquisitions involve the integration of two companiesnew businesses that have previously operated independently.independently from us. The integration of our operations with those of the HHI Businessacquired businesses is frequently expected to result in financial and operational benefits, including increased top line growth, margins, revenues and cost savings and be accretive to earnings per share, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and free cash flow before synergies. There can be no assurance, however, regarding when or the extent to which we will be able to realize these increased top line growth, margins, revenues, cost savings or accretions to earnings per share, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization or free cash flow or other benefits. Integration may also be difficult, unpredictable, and subject to delay because of possible company culture conflicts and different opinions on technical decisions and product roadmaps. We mustwill often be required to integrate or, in some cases, replace, numerous systems, including those involving management information, purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, billing, employee benefits, payroll and regulatory compliance, many of which aremay be dissimilar. In some instances, we and the HHI Businesscertain acquired businesses have served the same customers, and some customers may decide that it is desirable to have additional or different suppliers. Difficulties associated with the integration of acquired businesses could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may also acquire partial or full ownership in businesses or may acquire rights to market and distribute particular products or lines of products. The acquisition of a business or the rights to market specific products or use specific product names may involve a financial commitment by us, either in the form of cash or equity consideration. In the case of a new license, such commitments are usually in the form of prepaid royalties and future minimum royalty payments. There is no guarantee that we will acquire businesses or product distribution rights that will contribute positively to our earnings. Anticipated synergies may not materialize, cost savings may be less than expected, sales of products may not meet expectations and acquired businesses may carry unexpected liabilities.

In addition, in connection with the Hardware Acquisition,business acquisitions, we have assumed, and may assume in connection with future acquisitions, certain potential liabilities relating to the HHI Business.liabilities. To the extent we havesuch liabilities are not identified such liabilitiesby us or to the extent the indemnifications obtained from Stanley Black & Deckerthird parties are insufficient to cover knownsuch liabilities, these liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Integrating our business and the HHI Businesswith acquired businesses may divert our management’s attention away from operations.

Successful integration of our and the HHI Business’acquired businesses’ operations, products and personnel with us may place a significant burden on


22


our management and other internal resources. The diversion of management’s attention, and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process, could harm our business, financial conditionscondition and operating results.
We are required to supply certain products and services to Stanley Black & Decker and its subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of certain supply agreements for a period of time after the completion of the Hardware Acquisition. Our provision of products and services under these agreements require us to dedicate resources of the HHI Business and the TLM Residential Business and may result in liabilities to us.
Certain products and services currently used by Stanley Black & Decker are produced and provided using equipment of the HHI Business and the TLM Residential Business that we acquired or certain equipment belonging to Stanley Black & Decker and its subsidiaries that will continue to be located for a period of time after the completion of the Hardware Acquisition at facilities operated by the HHI Business and the TLM Residential Business and maintained by us pursuant to certain specifications. We and Stanley Black & Decker entered into supply agreements (each, a “Supply Agreement”), whereby we provide Stanley Black & Decker and its subsidiaries with certain of these products and services for a period of time. This requires us to dedicate resources of the HHI Business and the TLM Residential Business towards the provision of these products and services and may result in liabilities to us. These Supply Agreements are an accommodation to Stanley Black & Decker and its subsidiaries as part of the Hardware Acquisition, and the pricing of the products and services is on terms more favorable to Stanley Black & Decker and its subsidiaries than it would be in the ordinary course of business.

As a result of the Hardware Acquisition,business acquisitions, we may not be able to retain key personnel or recruit additional qualified personnel, which could materially affect our business and require us to incur substantial additional costs to recruit replacement personnel.

We are highly dependent on the continuing efforts of our senior management team and other key personnel. As a result of the Hardware Acquisition,business acquisitions, our current and prospective employees could experience uncertainty about their future roles. This uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key management, sales, marketing and technical personnel. Any failure to attract and retain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business after consummation of the Hardware Acquisition.business. In addition, we currently do not maintain “key person” insurance covering any member of our management team.

If any of our key personnel or those of our acquired businesses were to join a competitor or form a competing company, existing and potential customers or suppliers could choose to form business relationships with that competitor instead of us. There can be no assurance that confidentiality, non-solicitation, non-competition or similar agreements signed by former directors, officers, employees or stockholders of us, our acquired businesses or our transactional counterparties will be effective in preventing a loss of business.

General customer uncertainty related to the Hardware Acquisitionour business acquisitions could harm us.

Our customers may, in response to the announcement or consummation of the Hardware Acquisition,a business acquisition, delay or defer purchasing decisions. If our customers delay or defer purchasing decisions, our revenues could materially decline or any anticipated increases in revenue could be lower than expected.

31


A change in governmental regulations regarding the use of refrigerant gas R-134a or its potential future substitutes could have the righta material adverse effect on GAC’s ability to use certain Stanley Black & Decker trademarks, brand names and logos for a limited period of time. If we fail to establish in a timely manner a new, independently recognized brand name with a strong reputation, our revenue and profitability could decline.

In connection with our acquisitionsell its aftermarket A/C products.

The refrigerant R-134a is critical component of the HHI Business, we received a limited right to use certain Stanley Black & Decker trademarks, brand names and logos in marketing ourCompany’s aftermarket A/C products and services for only five years. Pursuant to a transitional trademark license agreement, Stanley Black & Decker granted us the right to use the “Stanley” and “Black & Decker” marks and logos, and certain other marks and logos, for up to five years after the completionis used in products which comprised approximately 34% of GAC’s net sales, or approximately 3% of the Hardware AcquisitionCompany’s net sales, in connectionthe year ended September 30, 2016. Older generation refrigerants such as R-12 (Freon) have been regulated for some time in the United States and elsewhere, due to concerns about their potential to contribute to ozone depletion. In recent years, refrigerants such as R-134a, which is an approved substitute for R-12, have also become the subject of regulatory focus due to their potential to contribute to global warming.

The European Union has passed regulations that require the phase out of R-134a in automotive cooling systems in new vehicles by 2017. In the United States, the Company has reported that it cannot predict what future action, if any, the EPA will take on the regulation of R-134a. But based on currently available information, it believes that it would take some time for suitable alternatives to R-134a to come into full scale commercial production and therefore such alternatives would not be readily available for wide spread use in new car models. If the future use of R-134a is phased out or is limited or prohibited in jurisdictions in which we do business, the future market for GAC’s products containing R-134a may be limited, which could have a material adverse impact on its results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

In addition, regulations may be enacted governing the packaging, use and disposal of the Company’s products containing refrigerants. For example, regulations are currently in effect in California that govern the sale and distribution of products containing R-134a. While the Company has reported that it is not aware of any noncompliance with certainsuch regulations, its failure to comply with these or possible future regulations in California, or elsewhere, could result in material fines or costs or the inability to sell its products in those markets, which could have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial condition and services. When our rightcash flows. If substitutes for R-134a become widely used in A/C systems and their use for DIY and retrofit purposes are not approved by the EPA, it could have a material adverse effect on GAC’s results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. In addition, the cost of HFO-1234yf, the leading long-term alternative to R-134a being proposed in the United States and the European Union for use in the Stanley Black & Decker trademarks, brand namesA/C systems of new vehicles, will likely be higher than that of R-134a. If HFO-1234yf becomes widely used and logos expires, wethe Company is able to develop products using HFO-1234yf, but is unable to price its products to reflect the increased cost of HFO-1234yf, it could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

All of GAC’s refrigerant products are produced at one facility, and a significant disruption or disaster at such a facility could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.

GAC’s manufacturing facility consists of one site which is located in Garland, Texas and thus GAC is dependent upon the continued safe operation of this facility. Its facility is subject to various hazards associated with the manufacturing, handling, storage, and transportation of chemical materials and products, including human error, leaks and ruptures, explosions, floods, fires, inclement weather and natural disasters, power loss or other infrastructure failures, mechanical failure, unscheduled downtime, regulatory requirements, the loss of certifications, technical difficulties, labor disputes, inability to obtain material, equipment or transportation, environmental hazards such as remediation, chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, and other risks. Many of these hazards could cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to, or destruction of, property and equipment and environmental contamination. In addition, the occurrence of material operation problems at GAC’s facility due to any of these hazards could cause a disruption in the production of its products. GAC may also encounter difficulties or interruption as a result of the application of enhanced manufacturing technologies or changes to production lines to improve GAC’s throughput or to upgrade or repair its production lines. The Company’s insurance policies have coverage in case of significant damage to its manufacturing facility but may not fully compensate GAC for the cost of replacement for any such damage and any loss from business interruption. As a result, GAC may not be ableadequately insured to maintaincover losses resulting from significant damage to its manufacturing facility. Any damage to its facility or enjoy comparable name recognitioninterruption in manufacturing could result in production delays and delays in meeting contractual obligations which could have a material adverse effect on GAC’s relationship with its customers and on its results of operations, financial condition or status under our new brand. If we are unable to successfully manage the transitioncash flows in any given period.

32


Risks Related to SB Holdings' Common Stock

HRG and the Harbinger Partiesits significant stockholders exercise significant influence over us and their interests in our business may be different from the interests of our stockholders.

HRG, as our majority stockholder, and Harbinger Capital Partners Fund I, Ltd., Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P. and Global Opportunities Breakaway Ltd. (together the “Harbinger Parties”), asits significant stockholders, of HRG, have the ability to influence the outcome of any corporate action by us that requires stockholder approval, including, but not limited to, the election of directors, approval of merger transactions and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, we are a party to a stockholder agreement with HRG and the Harbinger Parties.

certain of its stockholders.

This influence and actual control may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire SB Holdingsthe Company because any such consummation would likely require the consent of HRG and perhaps HRG and the Harbinger Parties. HRG and the Harbinger


23


Partiesits stockholders. HRG may also delay or prevent a change in control of SB Holdings. See “-Risks Related to our Business- The sale or other disposition by Harbinger Group Inc., the holder of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, to non-affiliates of a sufficient amount of the common stock of SB Holdings would constitute a change of control under the agreements governing Spectrum Brands’ debt.
Company.

In addition, because HRG owns more than 50% of the voting power of SB Holdings, SB Holdingsthe Company, the Company is considered a controlled company under the NYSE listing standards. As such, the NYSE corporate governance rules requiring that a majority of SB Holdings'the Company’s board of directors and SB Holdings'the Company’s entire compensation committee or the nominating and corporate governance committee be independent do not apply. As a result, the ability of SB Holdings'the Company’s independent directors to influence its business policies and affairs may be reduced.

If HRG were to sell substantial amounts of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock in the public market, or investors perceive that these sales could occur, the market price of SB Holdings'the Company's common stock could be adversely affected. SB HoldingsThe Company has entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with HRG, the Harbinger Partiescertain of HRG’s stockholders and certain other of our stockholders. If requested properly under the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, these stockholders have the right to require SB Holdingsthe Company to register all or some of such shares for sale under the Securities Act in certain circumstances, and also have the right to include those shares in a registration initiated by SB Holdings.the Company. If SB Holdingsthe Company is required to include the shares of its common stock held by these stockholders pursuant to these registration rights in a registration initiated by SB Holdings,the Company, sales made by such stockholders may adversely affect the price of SB Holdings'the Company's common stock and SB Holdings' ability to raise needed capital. In addition, if these stockholders exercise their demand registration rights and cause a large number of shares to be registered and sold in the public market or demand that SB Holdingsthe Company register theirits shares on a shelf registration statement, such sales or shelf registration may have an adverse effect on the market price of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock.

We are one of several companies in which HRG owns a controlling interest. The interests of HRG and these other companies may, from time to time, diverge from the interests of other SB Holdingsof the Company’s stockholders and from each other, particularly with regard to new investment opportunities. Neither HRG nor the Harbinger Parties areis not restricted from investing in other businesses involving or related to the marketing or distribution of household products, pet and pest products and personal care products. Both HRG and the Harbinger Parties may also engage in other businesses that compete or may in the future compete with SB Holdings.the Company.

Our Restated Bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our restated bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty, any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our restated bylaws, any action to interpret, apply, enforce, or determine the validity of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our restated bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

33


Even though SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock is currently traded on the NYSE, it has less liquidity than many other stocks quoted on a national securities exchange.

The trading volume in SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock on the NYSE has been relatively low when compared with larger companies listed on the NYSE or other stock exchanges. Because of this, it may be more difficult for stockholders to sell a substantial number of shares for the same price at which stockholders could sell a smaller number of shares. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock in the market, or the availability of shares of its common stock for sale in the market, will have on the market price of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock. We can give no assurance that sales of substantial amounts of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock in the market, or the potential for large amounts of sales in the market, would not cause the price of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock to decline or impair SB Holdings'the Company’s future ability to raise capital through sales of its common stock. Furthermore, because of the limited market and generally low volume of trading in SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock that could occur, the share price of its common stock could be more likely to be affected by broad market fluctuations, general market conditions, fluctuations in our operating results, changes in the market's perception of our business, and announcements made by SB Holdings,the Company, its competitors or parties with whom SB Holdingsthe Company has business relationships. The lack of liquidity in SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock may also make it difficult for us to issue additional securities for financing or other purposes, or to otherwise arrange for any financing we may need in the future. In addition, we may experience other adverse effects, including, without limitation, the loss of confidence in us by current and prospective suppliers, customers, employees and others with whom we have or may seek to initiate business relationships.

The market price of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control.

Factors that may influence the price of the common stock include, without limitation, the following:

·

loss of any of our key customers or suppliers;

    loss of any of our key customers or suppliers;

·

additions or departures of key personnel;

    additions or departures of key personnel;

·

sales of common stock;

    sales of the common stock;

·

our ability to execute our business plan;

    our ability to execute our business plan;

·

announcements and consummations of business acquisitions;

��

operating results that fall below expectations;

·

additional issuances of the common stock;

    low volume of sales due to concentrated ownership of the common stock;

24

Table of Contents

·

low volume of sales due to concentrated ownership of common stock;



·

intellectual property disputes;

·

industry developments;

·

economic and other external factors;

·

period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results; and

market concerns with respect to the potential indirect impact of matters not directly involving SB Holdings but impacting HRG or the Harbinger Parties.

·

market concerns with respect to the potential indirect impact of matters not directly involving the Company but impacting HRG or its affiliates.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock. You should also be aware that price volatility might be worse if the trading volume of shares of the common stock is low.

Additional issuances of SB Holdings'the Company’s common stock may result in dilution to its existing stockholders.

Prior to October 21, 2010, we had two active

Under our equity incentive plans under which shares of SB Holdings could be issued,plan approved by the 2009 Spectrum Brands Inc. Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”) and the Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Award Plan (the “RH Plan”). On October 21, 2010, SB Holdings' Board of Directors adoptedshareholders on March 1, 2011, called the Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Award Plan (the “2011 Equity Plan”), which was approved at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on March 1, 2011. As a result of shareholder approval of the 2011 Plan, no further awards will be granted under the 2009 Plan and the RH Plan. Up to 4,625,676 shares of common stock of SB Holdings,the Company, net of cancellations, maywere authorized to be issued. At the 2014 annual shareholders meeting, the 2011 Equity Plan was amended to increase the shares issuable by 1,000,000; therefore, a total of 5,625,676 shares, net of cancellations, are authorized to be issued under such plan. Increases to the number of shares issuable under the 2011 Plan.Equity Plan are subject to approval by the Board of Directors and shareholders. As of November 25, 2013,September 30, 2016, we have issued 667,933 restricted shares and 3,113,0684,525,494 restricted stock units under(or the 2009 Plan,equivalent number of shares of common stock upon the RH Plan andlapsing of the applicable restrictions) under the 2011 Plan and are authorizedhave a remaining authorization to issue up to a total of 1,512,6081,100,182 shares of our common stock, or options or restricted stock units exercisable for shares of common stock.

34


In addition, SB Holdings'the Company’s board of directors has the authority to issue additional shares of capital stock to provide additional financing or for other purposes in the future. The issuance of any such shares or exercise of any such options may result in a reduction of the book value or market price of the outstanding shares of common stock. If we do issue any such additional shares or any such options are exercised, such issuance or exercise also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other stockholders. As a result of such dilution, the proportionate ownership interest and voting power of a holder of shares of common stock could be decreased. Further, any such issuance or exercise could result in a change of control. Under our certificate of incorporation, holders of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock or capital stock into which any shares of common stock may be converted have certain rights to purchase their pro rata share of certain future issuances of securities.



ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.


25


ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The following table lists our principal owned or leased administrative, manufacturing, packaging and distribution facilities at September 30, 2013:

2016: 

Corporate & Administrative

Location

Function / Use

Owned / Leased

Facility

U.S. Locations

Function

Global Batteries

Middleton, Wisconsin

World Headquarters & AppliancesGBA Headquarters

Leased

Fennimore, Wisconsin(1)

Danbury, Connecticut

Alkaline Battery Manufacturing

GAC Headquarters

Leased

Portage, Wisconsin(1)

Earth City, Missouri

Zinc Air Button Cell and Lithium Coin Cell Battery, Foil Shaver Component Manufacturing

Pet, Home & Garden Headquarters

Leased

Deforest, Wisconsin(2)

Lake Forest, California

Distribution/Returns Center

HHI Headquarters

Leased

Dischingen, Germany(2)

Miami Lakes, Florida

Alkaline Battery Manufacturing

Latin America Headquarters

Leased

Washington, UK(2)

Non-U.S. Locations

Zinc Air Button Cell Battery Manufacturing & Distribution

Manchester, England

UK Headquarters

Owned

Mentone, Australia

APAC Headquarters

Leased

Sulzbach, Germany

Europe Headquarters

Leased

Mississauga, Canada

Canada Headquarters

Leased

Global Batteries and Appliances (GBA)

Location

Function / Use

Owned / Leased

U.S. Locations

Fennimore, Wisconsin

Battery Manufacturing

Owned

Portage, Wisconsin

Battery Manufacturing

Owned

DeForest, Wisconsin

Distribution

Leased

Dixon, Illinois

Distribution

Leased

Redlands, California

Distribution

Leased

Non-U.S. Locations

Dischingen, Germany

Battery Manufacturing

Leased

Guatemala City, Guatemala(1)Guatemala

Zinc Carbon

Battery Manufacturing

Owned

Jaboatao, Brazil(1)Brazil

Zinc Carbon

Battery Manufacturing

Owned

Dixon, Illinois(2)

Washington, UK

Battery & Lighting Device Packaging & DistributionManufacturing

Leased

Ellwangen-Neunheim, Germany(2)Germany

Battery & Lighting Device, Electric Shaver & Personal Care Product

Distribution

Leased

Redlands, California(2)

Guatemala City, Guatemala

Warehouse, Electric Shaver & Personal Care Product

Distribution

Owned

Manchester, England(1)

Mentone, Australia

Warehouse and Sales and administrative office

Distribution

Leased

Wolverhampton, England(1)

Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

Warehouse

Distribution

Owned

Wolverhampton, England(2)England

Warehouse

Distribution

Hardware & Home Improvement

Brockville, Canada(2)Hardware & Home Improvement Distribution
Charlotte, North Carolina(2)Hardware & Home Improvement Distribution
Cobourg, Canada(1)Hardware & Home Improvement Distribution
Denison, Texas(1)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing
Fort Mill, South Carolina(2)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing
Mexicali, Mexico(2)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing
Mira Loma, California(2)Hardware & Home Improvement Distribution
Monterrey, Mexico(1)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing, Sales and Distribution
Nogales, Mexico(1)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing
Reading, Pennsylvania(2)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing
Shenzhen, ChinaHardware & Home Improvement Distribution and administrative office
Subic Bay, Philippines(1)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing
Xiamen, China(2)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing
Xiaolan, China(1)Hardware & Home Improvement Manufacturing
Global Pet Supplies
Noblesville, Indiana(1)Pet Supply Manufacturing & Distribution
Bridgeton, Missouri(2)Pet Supply Manufacturing
Blacksburg, Virginia(1)Pet Supply Manufacturing
Melle, Germany(1)Pet Supply Manufacturing
Melle, Germany(2)Pet Supply Distribution
Edwardsville, Illinois(2)Pet Supply Distribution
Phnom Penh, Cambodia(2)Pet Supply Manufacturing
Roanoke, Virginia(2)Pet Supply Distribution
Home and Garden Business
Vinita Park, Missouri(2)Household & Controls and Contract Manufacturing
Earth City, Missouri(2)Household & Controls Manufacturing

Owned


26

35


Home & Hardware Improvement (HHI)


Location

Function / Use

Owned / Leased

U.S. Locations

Charlotte, North Carolina

Manufacturing & Distribution

Leased

Houston, Texas

Manufacturing & Distribution

Leased

Lititz, Pennsylvania

Manufacturing & Distribution

Leased

Denison, Texas

Manufacturing

Leased

Birmingham, Alabama

Distribution

Leased

Dallas, Texas

Distribution

Leased

Denison, Texas

Distribution

Owned

Elkhart, Indiana

Distribution

Leased

Mira Loma, California

Distribution

Leased

Non-U.S. Locations

Mexicali, Mexico

Manufacturing & Distribution

Leased

Chia-Yi, Taiwan

Manufacturing

Leased

Nogales, Mexico

Manufacturing

Owned

Subic Bay, Philippines

Manufacturing

Owned

Xiamen, China

Manufacturing

Leased

Xiaolan, China

Manufacturing

Leased

Brockville, Canada

Distribution

Leased

Shenzhen, China

Distribution

Leased

Global Pet Supplies (PET)

Location

Function / Use

Owned / Leased

U.S. Locations

Blacksburg, Virginia

Manufacturing

Owned

Bridgeton, Missouri

Manufacturing

Leased

Noblesville, Indiana

Manufacturing

Owned

St. Louis, Missouri

Manufacturing

Leased

Edwardsville, Illinois

Distribution

Leased

Non-U.S. Locations

Bogota, Colombia

Manufacturing & Distribution

Leased

Ambato, Ecuador

Manufacturing

Leased

Coevorden, Netherlands

Manufacturing

Owned

Leon, Mexico

Manufacturing

Leased

Melle, Germany

Manufacturing

Owned

Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Manufacturing

Leased

Melle, Germany

Distribution

Leased


Home & Garden (H&G)

(1) Facility is owned.

Location

Function / Use

Owned / Leased

U.S. Locations

St. Louis, Missouri

Manufacturing

Leased

Edwardsville, Illinois

Distribution

Leased

Global Auto Care (GAC)

(2) Facility is leased.

Location

Function / Use

Owned / Leased

U.S. Locations

Garland, Texas

Manufacturing & Distribution

Leased

Mentor, Ohio

Manufacturing & Distribution

Leased

Painesville, Ohio

Manufacturing & Distribution

Owned

Non-U.S. Locations

Ebbw Vale, Gwent, Wales

Manufacturing & Distribution

Leased

36


We also own, operate or contract with third parties to operate distribution centers, sales offices and other administrative offices throughout the world in support of our business. We lease our administrative headquarters and primary research and development facility located in Middleton, Wisconsin and the Hardware & Home Improvement administrative headquarters in Lake Forest, California.

We believe that our existing facilities are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in such facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Litigation

We are a defendant in various other matters of litigation generally arising out of the ordinary course of business.

We do not believe that any other matters or proceedings presently pending will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or cash flows.

Environmental

We have provided for the estimated costs associated with environmental remediation activities at some of our current and former manufacturing sites. We believe that any additional liability that may result from the resolution of these matters in excess of the amounts provided of approximately $5.1$4.4 million will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all such environmental laws that are applicable to our operations. See also the discussion captioned “Governmental Regulations and Environmental Matters” under Item 1 above.


ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

applicable




27

37



PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS’ COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

SB Holdings'

SBH’s common stock (the “SBH Common Stock”) is tradedtrades on the NYSENew York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “SPB.”

“SPB”. As of November 25, 2013,17, 2016, there were approximately 45 holders of record based upon data provided by the transfer agent for the SBH Common Stock.SBH’s common stock. We believe the number of beneficial holders of our Common StockSBH’s common stock is significantly in excess of this amount.
The following table sets forth the reported high and low bid prices per share of SBH Common Stockcommon stock as reported on the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape, for the fiscal period indicated:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

High

 

Low

Year Ended September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended September 30, 2016

 

$

138.95 

 

$

114.63 

Quarter ended July 3, 2016

 

$

122.52 

 

$

106.91 

Quarter ended April 3, 2016

 

$

110.39 

 

$

87.65 

Quarter ended January 3, 2016

 

$

103.57 

 

$

89.88 

Year Ended September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended September 30, 2015

 

$

106.55 

 

$

88.28 

Quarter ended June 28, 2015

 

$

105.07 

 

$

86.02 

Quarter ended March 29, 2015

 

$

98.83 

 

$

89.14 

Quarter ended December 28, 2014

 

$

98.36 

 

$

81.03 
 HighLow
Fiscal 2013  
Quarter ended September 30, 2013$67.64$56.16
Quarter ended June 30, 2013$62.10$53.36
Quarter ended March 31, 2013$56.59$44.93
Quarter ended December 30, 2012$47.83$40.24
Fiscal 2012  
Quarter ended September 30, 2012$42.12$32.85
Quarter ended July 1, 2012$35.73$32.11
Quarter ended April 1, 2012$34.96$27.91
Quarter ended January 1, 2012$28.02$22.17
   
Information regarding our

SB/RH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBH and accordingly, there is no established public trading market for its equity compensation planssecurities. As of November 17, 2016, there is set forth in Item 12. Security Ownershiponly one record holder of its equity securities. During the years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, SB/RH paid cash dividends of $97.2 million and $72.1 million, respectively, to SBH. Certain Beneficial Ownersrestrictive covenants within the Company’s debt facilities impose limitations on payment of dividends by SB/RH’s subsidiaries to SB/RH and Management and Related Stockholder Matters-Equity Compensation Plan Information.

to SBH.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On August 6, 2013,July 28, 2015, the Board of Directors of SBH approved a $200$300 million common stock repurchase program.  The authorization is effective for 2436 months. The following table reflects all shares repurchased, inclusive of shares purchased under the program:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Total Number

 

Average

 

Total Number

 

Approximate Dollar Value



 

of Shares

 

Price Paid

 

of Shares Purchased

 

of Shares that may



 

Purchased

 

Per Share

 

as Part of Plan

 

Yet Be Purchased

As of September 30, 2015

 

130,000 

 

$

98.18 

 

130,000 

 

$

287,236,600 

Quarter ended January 3, 2016

 

428,700 

 

 

93.88 

 

428,700 

 

 

246,989,425 

Quarter ended April 3, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

246,989,425 

Quarter ended July 3, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

246,989,425 

Quarter ended September 30, 2016

 

21,387 

 

 

132.33 

 

21,387 

 

 

244,159,304 

As of September 30, 2016

 

580,087 

 

$

96.26 

 

580,087 

 

$

244,159,304 

38


Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our Common Stock to the cumulative total return of (i) the Russell 1000 Financial Index, (ii) Russell 2000 Financial Index and (iii) our peer group selected in good faith, which is composed of the following companies (alphabetical order): Central Garden and Pet Company, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., The Clorox Company, Edgewell Personal Care Company, Energizer Holdings, Inc., Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc., Hanesbrands, Inc., Hasbro, Inc., Helen of Troy Limited, Mattel, Inc., Newell Brands, Inc., Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc., The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., and Tupperware Brands Corporation. For 2016, the peer group has been revised to delete Jarden Corporation because it was acquired by Newell Brands Inc. during 2016 and is no longer a public company. In connection with this transaction, Newell Brands Inc. succeeded to the business of Newell Rubbermaid Inc., and therefore Newell Brands Inc. has replaced Newell Rubbermaid Inc. in the peer group. Additionally, for 2016, the peer group has been revised to add Helen of Troy Limited because of its personal care products industry focus, comparable annual revenues and market capitalization to the Company. In addition for 2016, in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 201(e)(4), the graph now displays a comparison to the Russell 1000 index in addition to the Russell 2000, because during the index’s annual 2016 reconstitution process the Company was moved into the Russell 1000 from the Russell 2000.

The comparison below assumes that $100 was invested in (i) the common stock repurchase program discussed above.

of SBH from September 30, 2011 until September 30, 2016. The comparison is based upon the closing price of the common stock, as applicable, and assumes the reinvestment of all dividends, if any. The returns of each of the companies in our peer group are weighted according to the respective company’s stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated.

     
Period
 
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased 
 
Average
Price Paid
Per Share 
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs 
 
Maximum Number
of Shares that may
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs 
 
Quarter Ended September 30, 2013    
July 1, 2013 - July 28, 2013


July 29, 2013 - August 25, 2013


August 26, 2013 - September 30, 201350,000
$60.13
50,000
  
 
 
 
Total50,000
$60.13
50,000


28

39




ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

The following selected historical financial data is derived from ourSBH’s audited consolidated financial statements. Only our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 and our Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information presented belowstatements as of and for the fiscal yearyears ended September 30, 2013 also includes the results of the HHI Business operations since December 17, 2012,30. The summary has been derived in part from, and the results of TLM Taiwan since April 8, 2013.

The following selected financial data, which may not be indicative of future performance, should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the information contained in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and AnalysisConsolidated Financial Statements of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsthe Company included elsewhere herein.in this Annual Report.  



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share data)

 

2016(1)

 

2015(2)

 

2014(3)

 

2013(4)

 

2012(5)

 

Statement of Operations Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

 

$

4,085.6 

 

$

3,252.4 

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,919.9 

 

 

1,670.3 

 

 

1,568.9 

 

 

1,390.3 

 

 

1,115.7 

 

Operating income

 

 

656.2 

 

 

474.1 

 

 

481.9 

 

 

351.2 

 

 

301.7 

 

Interest expense

 

 

250.0 

 

 

271.9 

 

 

202.1 

 

 

375.6 

 

 

191.9 

 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

 

397.6 

 

 

193.3 

 

 

273.5 

 

 

(27.9)

 

 

109.0 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

40.0 

 

 

43.9 

 

 

59.0 

 

 

27.4 

 

 

60.4 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

357.6 

 

 

149.4 

 

 

214.5 

 

 

(55.3)

 

 

48.6 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 

 

357.1 

 

 

148.9 

 

 

214.1 

 

 

(55.2)

 

 

48.6 

 

Restructuring and Related Charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

0.5 

 

$

2.1 

 

$

3.7 

 

$

10.0 

 

$

9.8 

 

Operating expenses

 

 

14.7 

 

 

26.6 

 

 

19.2 

 

 

24.0 

 

 

9.7 

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

6.02 

 

$

2.68 

 

$

4.07 

 

$

(1.06)

 

$

0.94 

 

Diluted

 

 

5.99 

 

 

2.66 

 

 

4.02 

 

 

(1.06)

 

 

0.91 

 

Dividends per share

 

 

1.47 

 

 

1.27 

 

 

1.15 

 

 

0.75 

 

 

1.00 

 

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

59.3 

 

 

55.6 

 

 

52.6 

 

 

52.0 

 

 

51.6 

 

Diluted

 

 

59.6 

 

 

55.9 

 

 

53.3 

 

 

52.0 

 

 

53.3 

 

Cash Flow and Related Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

615.0 

 

$

444.3 

 

$

432.7 

 

$

256.5 

 

$

258.8 

 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

 

 

95.2 

 

 

89.1 

 

 

73.3 

 

 

82.0 

 

 

46.8 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

183.0 

 

 

170.0 

 

 

157.6 

 

 

139.9 

 

 

104.6 

 

Statement of Financial Position Data (at September 30)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

275.3 

 

$

247.9 

 

$

194.6 

 

$

207.3 

 

$

158.0 

 

Working capital (6)(7)

 

 

537.3 

 

 

660.6 

 

 

485.0 

 

 

497.5 

 

 

422.7 

 

Total assets (7)(8)

 

 

7,069.1 

 

 

7,193.8 

 

 

5,429.6 

 

 

5,543.2 

 

 

3,695.9 

 

Total debt (8)

 

 

3,620.2 

 

 

3,905.9 

 

 

2,939.7 

 

 

3,153.6 

 

 

1,630.0 

 

Total equity

 

 

1,844.0 

 

 

1,606.8 

 

 

1,086.8 

 

 

940.1 

 

 

989.1 

 

On February 3, 2009, we and our wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries (the "Debtors") filed petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas. On August 28, 2009 (the "Effective Date"), the Debtors emerged from Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Effective as of the Effective Date and pursuant to the Debtors' confirmed plan of reorganization, we converted from a Wisconsin corporation to a Delaware corporation.
The term "Predecessor Company" refers to Spectrum Brands, our Wisconsin predecessor, and its subsidiaries prior to the Effective Date. The term "Successor Company" refers to Spectrum Brands, the Delaware successor, and its subsidiaries from the Effective Date forward.
Financial information in our financial statements prepared after August 29, 2009 is not comparable to financial information from prior periods.


29


  
Successor
Company
 
Predecessor
Company
  2013 2012 2011 2010 
Period from
August 31,  2009
through
September  30,
2009
 
Period from
October 1,  2008
through
August  30,
2009
Statement of Operations Data:            
Net sales $4,085.6
 $3,252.4
 $3,186.9
 $2,567.0
 $219.9
 $2,010.6
Gross profit 1,390.3
 1,115.7
 1,128.9
 921.4
 64.4
 751.8
Operating income (1) 351.2
 301.7
 227.9
 168.8
 0.1
 156.8
Interest expense (12) 375.6
 191.9
 208.3
 277.0
 17.0
 172.9
Other expense (income), net 3.5
 0.9
 2.5
 12.3
 (0.8) 3.3
Reorganization items expense (income), net 
 
 
 3.6
 4.0
 (1,142.8)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes (28.0) 109.0
 17.1
 (124.2) (20.0) 1,123.4
Income tax expense 27.4
 60.4
 92.3
 63.2
 51.2
 22.6
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax(2) 
 
 
 (2.7) 0.4
 (86.8)
Net income (loss)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) (55.3) 48.6
 (75.2) (190.1) (70.8) 1,013.9
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest (0.1) 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest (55.2) 48.6
 (75.2) (190.1) (70.8) 1,013.9
Restructuring and related charges—cost of goods sold(8) 10.0
 9.8
 7.8
 7.2
 0.2
 13.2
Restructuring and related charges—operating expenses(8) 24.0
 9.7
 20.8
 17.0
 1.6
 30.9
Per Share Data:            
Net (loss) income per common share            
Basic $(1.06) $0.94
 $(1.47) $(5.28) $(2.36) $19.76
Diluted (1.06) 0.91
 (1.47) (5.28) (2.36) 19.76
Average shares outstanding            
Basic 52.0
 51.6
 51.1
 36.0
 30.0
 51.3
Diluted (9) 52.0
 53.3
 51.1
 36.0
 30.0
 51.3
Cash Flow and Related Data:            
Net cash provided by operating activities $256.5
 $254.8
 $227.4
 $57.3
 $75.0
 $1.6
Capital expenditures(10) 82.0
 46.8
 36.2
 40.3
 2.7
 8.1
Depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of debt issuance costs)(10) 183.8
 133.8
 135.1
 117.4
 8.6
 58.5
Statement of Financial Position Data (at period end):            
Cash and cash equivalents $207.3
 $158.0
 $142.4
 $170.6
 $97.8
  
Working capital(11) 530.5
 450.8
 441.4
 536.9
 323.7
  
Total assets 5,626.7
 3,751.6
 3,626.7
 3,873.7
 3,020.7
  
Total long-term debt, net of current maturities 3,115.9
 1,652.9
 1,535.5
 1,723.1
 1,530.0
  
Total debt 3,218.9
 1,669.3
 1,551.6
 1,743.8
 1,583.5
  
Total shareholders’ equity 940.1
 989.1
 1,018.5
 1,046.4
 660.9
  

30


(1)

Pursuant to

For the guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 350: “Intangibles-Goodwillyear ended September 30, 2016, interest expense includes $15.6 million of tender premium and Other,” we conduct annual impairment testinga non-cash expense of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. As$5.8 million as a result of these analyses we recordedthe write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs in connection with the redemption of the 6.375% Notes. Income tax expense includes a non-cash pretax impairment chargesbenefit of $111.1 million from a decrease in the valuation allowance against net deferred tax asset.

(2)

For the year ended September 30, 2015, the operating results include the Armored AutoGroup operations since the acquisition date of May 21, 2015; Salix operations since the acquisition date of January 16, 2015; European IAMS and Eukanuba operations since the acquisition date of December 31, 2014; and Tell operations since the acquisition date of October 1, 2014. Interest expense of $58.8 million was incurred related to the financing of the acquisition of AAG and the refinancing of the then-existing senior credit facility and asset based revolving loan facility. Income tax expense includes a non-cash benefit of $20.2 million from a decrease in the valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets, and a $22.8 million benefit due to the reversal of valuation allowance in conjunction with the acquisition of the AAG business.

(3)

For the year ended September 30, 2014, the operating results include the Liquid Fence operations since the acquisition date of January 2, 2014. Interest expense includes a non-cash charge of $9.2 million as a result of the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and unamortized discounts in connection with the amendment of the Company's then existing term loans. Income tax expense includes a non-cash benefit of approximately $32$115.6 million and $34 millionfrom a decrease in Fiscal 2011the valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets.

(4)

For the year ended September 30, 2013, the operating results include the HHI Business operations since the acquisition date of December 17, 2012, and the period from October 1, 2008 through August 30, 2009, respectively. NoTLM Taiwan operations since the acquisition date of April 8, 2013. Interest expense includes $105.6 million fees and expenses along with a $10.9 million non-cash impairment charges were recorded during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2010charge for the write-off of unamortized debt issuance cost and unamortized premiums in connection with the period from August 31, 2009 through September 30, 2009. See the “Critical Accounting Policies—Valuation of Assetsextinguishment and Asset Impairment“ section of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as Note 2(j), "Significant Accounting Policies—Intangible Assets", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details on impairment charges.

(2)On November 5, 2008, Spectrum Brands’ board of directors committed to the shutdownreplacement of the growing products portionCompany's 9.5% Notes and then-existing term loan in conjunction with the acquisition of the Home and Garden Business, which included the manufacturing and marketing of fertilizers, enriched soils, mulch and grass seed, following an evaluation of the historical lack of profitability and the projected input costs and significant working capital demands for the growing product portion of the Home and Garden Business during Fiscal 2009. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2009, we completed the shutdown of the growing products portion of the Home and Garden Business and, accordingly, began reporting the results of operations of this business as discontinued operations. Therefore, the presentation of all historical continuing operations excludes the growing products portion of the Home and GardenHHI Business.
(3)Fiscal 2013 income tax expense of $27 million Income taxes includes a non-cash charge of approximately $65$64.4 million resulting from an increase in the valuation allowance against certain net deferred tax assets, net of a $50$49.8 million benefit due to the reversal of $50 milliona portion of the valuation allowance in conjunction with the acquisition of the HHI Business.

(4)

(5)

Fiscal

For the year ended September 30, 2012, income taxthe operating results include the FURminator operations since the acquisition date of December 22, 2011, and the Black Flag operations since the acquisition date of October 31, 2011. Interest expense of $60 million includes a non-cash charge of approximately $14 million resulting from an increase in the valuation allowance against certain net deferred tax assets, net of a $15 million benefit due to the reversal of $15million of the valuation allowance in conjunction with the acquisition of FURminator.

(5)Fiscal 2011 income tax expense of $92 million includes a non-cash charge of approximately $65 million resulting from an increase in the valuation allowance against certain net deferred tax assets.
(6)Fiscal 2010 income tax expense of $63 million includes a non-cash charge of approximately $92 million resulting from an increase in the valuation allowance against certain net deferred tax assets.
(7)Included in the period from August 31, 2009 through September 30, 2009 for the Successor Company is a non-cash tax charge of $58$2.1 million related to the residual U.S. and foreign taxes on approximately $166 million of actual and deemed distributions of foreign earnings. Income tax expense for the Predecessor Company for the period from October 1, 2008 through August 30, 2009 includes a non-cash adjustment of approximately $52 million resulting from a reduction in the valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets. Included in income tax expense for the period from October 1, 2008 through August 30, 2009 for the Predecessor Company is a non-cash charge of $104 million related to the tax effects of the fresh start adjustments. In addition, income tax expense for the Predecessor Company for this period includes the tax effect of the gain on the cancellation of debt from the extinguishment of the then existing senior subordinated notes as well as the modification of the then existing senior term credit facility. The tax effect of these gains increased the Company’s U.S. net deferred tax asset exclusive of indefinite lived intangibles by approximately $124 million. However, due to the Company’s full valuation allowance on the U.S. net deferred tax assets exclusive of indefinite lived intangibles as of August 30, 2009, the tax effect of the gain on the cancellation of debt and the modification of the senior secured credit facility was offset by a corresponding adjustment to increase the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets by $124 million. The tax effect of the fresh start adjustments, the gain on the cancellation of debt and the modification of the senior secured credit facility, net of corresponding adjustments to the valuation allowance, are netted against reorganization items.

40


(8)See Note 14, "Restructuring and Related Charges", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.
(9)Diluted average shares outstanding for each of Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2011, Fiscal 2010, the period from August 31, 2009 through September 30, 2009 and the period from October 1, 2008 through August 30, 2009 does not assume the exercise of common stock equivalents as the impact would be antidilutive due to the losses reported for those periods.
(10)Amounts reflect the results of continuing operations only.
(11)Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.
(12)Fiscal 2013 includes a non-cash charge of $16 million related to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and unamortized premiums in connection with the extinguishment and replacement of the Company’s 9.5% Notes and Term Loan in conjunction with the acquisition of the HHI Business. Fiscal 2012 includes a non-cash charge of $2 million related to

the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and unamortized premiums in connection with the extinguishment and refinancing of the Company’s 12% Notes. Fiscal 2011Income tax expense includes a non-cash charge of $24approximately $13.9 million relatedfrom an increase in the valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets, net of a $14.5 million benefit due to the write-offreversal of unamortized debt issuance costs and unamortized discountsa portion of the valuation allowance in conjunction with the refinancingacquisition of FURminator.

(6)

Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities per the consolidated statements of financial position.

(7)

During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company retrospectively adopted ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, resulting in a reclassification of current deferred tax assets of $44.7 million, $36.7 million, $33.0 million and $28.1 million for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively; and current deferred tax liabilities of $4.6 million and $2.8 million for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The adoption of the Company’s TermASU resulted in the reclassification of total current and non-current deferred tax assets of $39.1 million, $32.3 million, $18.2 million and $16.4 million for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012 respectively.

(8)

During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company retrospectively adopted ASU No. 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt facility. Fiscal 2010 includesIssuance Costs, resulting in a non-cash chargereclassification of $83 million related to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $65.1 million, $51.1 million, $65.3 million and unamortized discounts$39.3 million for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2014, 2013 and premiums in connection with the extinguishment and refinancing of debt that was completed in conjunction with the merger with Russell Hobbs.


31



ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS2012, respectively.

Introduction

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Omitted pursuant to General instruction I of Form 10-K.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is management’s discussion of the financial results, liquidity and other key items related to our performance and should be read in conjunction with Item 6. Selected Financial Data and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. All references to Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 refer to fiscal year periods ended September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SB Holdings” or the “Company”),Report. The following is a diversified global branded consumer products company. Spectrum Brands, Inc. (“Spectrum Brands”), is a wholly owned subsidiarycombined report of SB Holdings. SB Holdings' common stock trades onSBH and SB/RH, and the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “SPB.”
following discussion includes SBH and certain matters related to SB/RH as signified below. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms the “Company,” “Spectrum,” “we,” “our” or “us” are used to refer to SB HoldingsSBH and its subsidiaries.subsidiaries and SB/RH and its subsidiaries, collectively.

Business Overview

Refer to Item 1 “Business” included elsewhere within this Annual Report for an overview of our business.

On December 17, 2012, we acquired

Acquisitions

The application of acquisition accounting as a result of business combinations can significantly affect certain assets, liabilities and expenses. During the residential hardwareyears ended September 30, 2015 and home improvement business (the “HHI Business”) from Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (“Stanley Black & Decker”), which includes (i)2014, the equity interestsCompany has completed a number of certain subsidiaries of Stanley Black & Decker engagedacquisitions as outlined below. There were no acquisitions during the year ended September 30, 2016. See Note 3, “Acquisitions” in the business and (ii) certain assets of Stanley Black & Decker used or heldNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included elsewhere within this Annual Report, for use in connection withfurther additional detail regarding acquisition activity.

Armored AutoGroup - On May 21, 2015, the business (the “Hardware Acquisition”). On April 8, 2013, weCompany completed the acquisition of certain assetsAAG, a consumer products company consisting primarily of Tong Lung Metal Industry Co. Ltd.Armor All® branded appearance products, STP® branded performance chemicals, and A/C PRO® branded do-it-yourself automotive air conditioner recharge products. The results of AAG’s operations are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, since May 21, 2015 and reported as a separate segment, GAC.

Salix - On January 16, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of Salix, a vertically integrated producer and distributor of natural rawhide dog chews, treats and snacks. The results of Salix’s operations are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, and as part of the PET segment, since January 16, 2015.

European IAMS and Eukanuba - On December 31, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of Procter & Gamble’s European IAMS and Eukanuba pet food business (“European IAMS and Eukanuba”), including its brands for dogs and cats. The results of the European IAMS and Eukanuba’s operations are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, and as part of the PET segment, since December 31, 2014.

Tell Manufacturing - On October 1, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of Tell Manufacturing, Inc. (“Tell”), a Taiwan Corporation ("TLM Taiwan”), which is involvedmanufacturer and distributor of commercial doors, locks and hardware. The results of Tell’s operations are included in the productionCompany’s Consolidated Statements of residential locksets. For information pertaining to the Hardware Acquisition, see Note 15, “Acquisitions” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Business Overview
We manufactureIncome, and market alkaline, zinc carbon and hearing aid batteries, herbicides, insecticides and repellants and specialty pet supplies. We design and market rechargeable batteries, battery-powered lighting products, electric shavers and accessories, grooming products and hair care appliances. We also design, market and distribute a broad range of branded small household appliances and personal care products. Our manufacturing and product development facilities are located in the United States ("U.S."), Europe, Latin America and Asia. Substantially all of our rechargeable batteries, chargers and portable lighting products, shaving and grooming products, small household appliances and personal care products are manufactured by third-party suppliers, primarily located in Asia.
With the additionas part of the HHI Business, we design, manufacture, market, distribute and sell certain hardware, home improvement and plumbing products, andsegment, since October 1, 2014.

Liquid Fence - On January 2, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of the Liquid Fence Company (“Liquid Fence”), a producer of animal repellents. The results of Liquid Fence’s operations are a leading U.S. provider of residential locksets and builders' hardware and a leading provider of faucets. The HHI Business has a broad portfolio of recognized brand names, including Kwikset, Weiser, Baldwin, National Hardware, Stanley, FANAL and Pfister, as well as patented technologies such as Smartkey, a rekeyable lockset technology, and Smart Code Home Connect. HHI Business customers include retailers, non-retailers and homebuilders. The HHI Business has sales offices, manufacturing facilities and distribution centersincluded in the U.S., Canada, MexicoCompany’s Consolidated Statements of Income, and Asia.

We sell our products in approximately 140 countries through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, industrial distributors and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and enjoy strong name recognition in our markets under the Rayovac, VARTA and Remington brands, each of which has been in existence for more than 80 years, and under the Tetra, 8-in-1, Dingo, Nature's Miracle, Spectracide, Cutter, Hot Shot, Black & Decker, George Foreman, Russell Hobbs, Farberware, Black Flag, FURminator, the previously mentioned HHI Business brands and various other brands.
Our diversified global branded consumer products have positions in seven major product categories: consumer batteries; small appliances; pet supplies; electric shaving and grooming; electric personal care; home and garden controls; and hardware and home improvement, which consistsas part of the recently acquired HHI Business. Our chief operating decision-maker manages the businesses in four vertically integrated, product-focused reporting segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances, which consists of our worldwide battery, electric shaving and grooming, electric personal care, and small appliances primarily in the kitchen and home product categories (“Global Batteries & Appliances”); (ii) Global Pet Supplies, which consists of our worldwide pet supplies business (“Global Pet Supplies”); (iii) Home and Garden Business, which consists of our home and garden and insect control business (the “Home and Garden Business”); and (iv) Hardware & Home Improvement, which consists of the recently acquired HHI Business (“Hardware & Home Improvement”). Management reviews our performance based on these segments. For information pertaining to our business segments, see Note 11, “Segment Information” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on our operating

H&G segment, since January 2, 2014.

32

41



segments.
Global and geographic strategic initiatives and financial objectives are determined at the corporate level. Each business segment is responsible for implementing defined strategic initiatives and achieving certain financial objectives and has a general manager responsible for sales and marketing initiatives and the financial results for all product lines within that business segment.
Our operating performance is influenced by a number of factors including: general economic conditions; foreign exchange fluctuations; trends in consumer markets; consumer confidence and preferences; our overall product line mix, including pricing and gross margin, which vary by product line and geographic market; pricing of certain raw materials and commodities; energy and fuel prices; and our general competitive position, especially as impacted by our competitors’ advertising and promotional activities and pricing strategies.
Cost Reduction Initiatives

Restructuring Activity

We continually seek to improve our operational efficiency, match our manufacturing capacity and product costs to market demand and better utilize our manufacturing resources. We have undertaken various initiatives to reduce manufacturing and operating costs.

The most significant of these initiatives are outlined below. See Note 4, “Restructuring and Related Charges” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included elsewhere within this Annual Report, for additional detail regarding restructuring and related activity.

Fiscal 2013GAC Business Rationalization Initiatives – . ToDuring the third quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, the Company implemented a series of initiatives through the GAC segment to consolidate certain operations and reduce operating costs. These initiatives included headcount reductions and the exit of certain facilities. Total costs associated with these initiatives are expected to be approximately $20 million and are anticipated to be incurred through September 30, 2017, of which $5.3 million has been incurred to date.

HHI Business Rationalization Initiatives - During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, the Company implemented a series of initiatives throughout the HHI business segment to reduce operating costs and exit low margin business outside of the U.S. These initiatives included headcount reductions, the exit of certain facilities and the sale of a portion of the global HHI operations. Costs associated with these initiatives of $16.6 million were incurred to date and completed as of September 30, 2016.

Global Expense Rationalization Initiatives - During the third quarter of the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company which consistimplemented a series of initiatives to reduce operating costs. These initiatives consisted of headcount reductions in the Global Batteries & Appliances segmentGBA and CorporatePET segments and in Corporate. Costs associated with these initiatives of $47.0 million were incurred to date and completed as of September 30, 2016.

Other Restructuring Activities – The Company is entering or may enter into small, less significant initiatives and restructuring activities to reduce costs and improve margins throughout the organization. Individually these activities are not substantial, and occur over a shorter time period (less than 12 months). Total costs associated with these initiatives are expected to be approximately $6 million, of which $2.9 million has been incurred to date.

Refinancing Activity

The following recent financing activity has a significant impact on the comparability of financial results on the condensed consolidated financial statements. See Note 10, “Debt” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included elsewhere within this Annual Report, for additional detail regarding debt.

During the year ended September 30, 2016, we refinanced a portion of our debt to extend maturities and reduce borrowing costs. On September 20, 2016, we issued €425 million aggregate principal amount of 4.00% unsecured notes due 2026 (the “Global Expense Rationalization Initiatives”“4.00% Notes”).

Fiscal 2009. In The proceeds from the 4.00% Notes and draws on the Revolver were used to repay our outstanding 6.375% unsecured notes due 2020 (the “6.375% Notes”) and pay fees and expenses in connection with our announcementthe refinancing. The Company repurchased $390.3 million aggregate principal amount of the 6.375% Notes through a plan to reduce headcount within eachcash tender offer on September 20, 2016, with the remaining outstanding aggregate principal amount of $129.7 million subsequently redeemed by the Company on October 20, 2016.

During the year ended September 30, 2015, we refinanced a portion of our segmentsdebt to improve liquidity, extend maturities and to exit certain facilities in the U.S. related to the Global Pet Supplies segment, we implemented a number of cost reduction initiatives (the “Global Cost Reduction Initiatives”). These initiatives also included consultation, legal and accounting fees related to the evaluation of our capital structure.

Meeting Consumer Needs through Technology and Development
We continue to focus our efforts on meeting consumer needs for our products through new product development and technology innovations. Research and development efforts associated with our electric shaving and grooming products allow us to deliver to the market unique cutting systems. Research and development efforts associated with our electric personal care products allow us to deliver to our customers products that save them time, provide salon alternatives and enhance their in-home personal care options. We are continuously pursuing new innovations for our shaving, grooming and hair care products including foil and rotary shaver improvements, trimmer enhancements and technologies that deliver skin and hair care benefits.

During Fiscal 2013, we introduced the Kevo smart lock under the Kwikset brand. This bluetooth enabled technology gives owners the ability to lock and unlock their doors with their smartphone, send electronic keys to others and receive notifications whenever a user enters or exits their doors. We expect to begin sales of Kevo products in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014. Within our Home and Garden Business segment, we entered the rodenticide category with the Black Flag Rodenticide product line. We also introduced several innovative products such as the powerful, non-selective herbicide, SpectracideWeed & Grass Foaming Edger and the Cutter Skinsations insect repellent aerosol. Under the Remington brand we launched the HyperFlex series rotary shavers, indestructible hair clippers and an award winning wax applicating system and epilator line. Additionally, Rayovac launched the Ready Power 10 year guarantee across all alkaline portfolios, award winning emergency 2-Hour Power and back-up 7-Hour Power affordable portable power devices and an environmentally friendly rechargeable smart phone charger. During Fiscal 2013 our Global Pet Supplies segment introduced Dingo Market Cuts which is a new line of wholesome Chicken Jerky Fillets that are made in the U.S.  Additionally, a new line of environmentally friendly stain and odor products were launched under the Nature’s Miracle Green brand.
Competitive Landscape
We compete in seven major product categories: consumer batteries, hardware and home improvement, pet supplies, home and garden control products, electric shaving and grooming products, small appliances, and electric personal care products.
The consumer battery product category consists of non-rechargeable alkaline or zinc carbon batteries in cell sizes of AA, AAA, C, D and 9-volt, specialty batteries, which include rechargeable batteries, hearing aid batteries, photo batteries and watch/calculator batteries, and portable lighting products. Most consumer batteries are marketed under one of the following brands: Rayovac/VARTA, Duracell, Energizer or Panasonic. In addition, some retailers market private label batteries, particularly in Europe. The majority of consumers in North America and Europe purchase alkaline batteries. The Latin America market consists primarily of zinc carbon batteries but is gradually converting to higher-priced alkaline batteries as household

33


disposable income grows. Our major competitors in the consumer batteries product category are Energizer Holdings, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company and Matsushita.
We believe that we are the largest worldwide marketer of hearing aid batteries and that we continue to maintain a leading global market position. We believe that our close relationship with hearing aid manufacturers and other customers, as well as our product performance improvements and packaging innovations, position us for continued success in this category.
Our global pet supplies business comprises aquatics equipment (aquariums, filters, pumps, etc.), aquatics consumables (fish food, water treatments and conditioners, etc.) and specialty pet products for dogs, cats, birds and other small domestic animals. The pet supply market is extremely fragmented, with no competitor holding a market share greater than twenty percent. We believe that our brand positioning, including the leading global aquatics brand in Tetra, our diverse array of innovative and attractive products and our strong retail relationships and global infrastructure will allow us to remain competitive in this fast growing industry. Our largest competitors in the pet supplies product category are Mars Corporation, The Hartz Mountain Corporation and Central Garden & Pet Company.
Products in our home and garden category are sold through the Home and Garden Business, which operates in the U.S. market under the major brand names Spectracide, Hot Shot, Cutter, Repel, Black Flag and Garden Safe. The Home and Garden Business manufactures and markets outdoor and indoor insect control products, rodenticides, herbicides, insect repellents and lawn maintenance products. In addition, we produce and market several private-label brands for many major retailers.
The Home and Garden Business’ marketing position is primarily that of a branded value, enhanced and supported by innovative products of outstanding quality and appealing packaging that is designed to drive sales at the point of purchase. Our commitment to quality and value has earned the trust of consumers and the confidence of retailers, who count on us to deliver the fast-selling products, merchandising solutions and quality service they require. The Home and Garden Business’ primary competitors include The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Central Garden & Pet Company and S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
We also operate in the shaving and grooming and personal care product category, consisting of electric shavers and accessories, electric grooming products and hair care appliances. Electric shavers include men’s and women’s shavers (both rotary and foil design) and electric shaver accessories consisting of shaver replacement parts (primarily foils and cutters), pre-shave products and cleaning agents. Electric shavers are marketed primarily under our Remington brand. Our primary competitors in the electric shaving and grooming category are Procter & Gamble, makers of Braun, and Koninklijke Phillips Electronics N.V., makers of Norelco. Electric grooming products include beard and mustache trimmers, nose and ear trimmers, body groomers and haircut kits and related accessories. Hair care appliances include hair dryers, straightening irons, styling irons and hair-setters. Europe and North America account for the majority of our worldwide electric personal care product category sales. Our major competitors in the electric personal care product category are Conair Corporation, Wahl Clipper Corporation and Helen of Troy Limited.
The Hardware & Home Improvement segment has developed a market-leading franchise with leading brands, making it the most desired manufacturer among top home builders and major retailers. Hardware & Home Improvement is acclaimed as a market leader in the U.S. and Canadian lockset business. Competition within the industry varies based on location as well as product segment. The main source of competition for locks includes other third party manufacturers such as Schlage, a division of Ingersoll-Rand and private label import brands such as Defiant and Gatehouse. The major U.S. competitors of Pfister, the plumbing brand sold by our Hardware & Home Improvement segment, are Masco, Fortune Brands, Kohler, and American Standard. Hardware & Home Improvement also competes with The Home Depot and Lowe’s private label brands.
Products in our small appliances category consist of small electrical appliances primarily in the kitchen and home product categories. Primary competitor brands in the small appliance category include Hamilton Beach, Procter Silex, Sunbeam, Mr. Coffee, Oster, General Electric, Rowenta, DeLonghi, Kitchen Aid, Cuisinart, Krups, Braun, Rival, Europro, Kenwood, Philips, Morphy Richards, Breville and Tefal.
The following factors contribute to our ability to succeed in these highly competitive product categories:
Strong Diversified Global Brand Portfolio. We have a global portfolio of well-recognized consumer product brands. We believe that the strength of our brands positions us to extend our product lines and provide our retail customers with strong sell-through to consumers.
Strong Global Retail Relationships. We have well-established business relationships with many of the top global retailers, distributors and wholesalers, which have assisted us in our efforts to expand our overall market penetration and promote sales.
Expansive Distribution Network. We distribute our products in approximately 140 countries through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, industrial distributors and Original Equipment Manufacturers.

34


Innovative New Products, Packaging and Technologies. We have a long history of product and packaging innovations in each of our seven product categories and continually seek to introduce new products both as extensions of existing product lines and as new product categories.
Experienced Management Team. Our management team has substantial consumer products experience.reduce borrowing costs. On average, each senior management team member has more thanMay 20, years of experience at Spectrum, VARTA, Remington, Russell Hobbs or other branded consumer product companies such as Newell Rubbermaid and Schering-Plough.
Seasonal Product Sales
On a consolidated basis our financial results are approximately equally weighted between quarters, however, sales of certain product categories tend to be seasonal. Sales in the consumer battery, electric shaving and grooming and electric personal care product categories, particularly in North America, tend to be concentrated in the December holiday season (Spectrum’s first fiscal quarter). Demand for hardware and home improvement products increases during the spring and summer construction period (Spectrum's third and fourth fiscal quarters). Demand for pet supplies products remains fairly constant throughout the year. Demand for home and garden control products sold though the Home and Garden Business typically peaks during the first six months of the calendar year (Spectrum’s second and third fiscal quarters). Small Appliances peaks from July through December primarily due to the increased demand by customers in the late summer for “back-to-school” sales and in the fall for the holiday season.

The seasonality of our sales during the last three fiscal years is as follows:
Percentage of Annual Sales
  
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30,
Fiscal Quarter Ended 2013 2012 2011
December 21% 26% 27%
March 24% 23% 22%
June 27% 25% 25%
September 28% 26% 26%
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012
Highlights of Consolidated Operating Results

Net Sales. Net sales for Fiscal 2013increased$834 million to $4,086 million from $3,252 million in Fiscal 2012, a 26%increase. The following table details the principal components of the change in net sales from Fiscal 2012 to Fiscal 2013 (in millions):
 Net Sales
Fiscal 2012 Net Sales$3,252
Addition of hardware and home improvement products870
Increase in pet supplies12
Increase in electric personal care products5
Increase in home and garden control products3
Decrease in electric shaving and grooming products(1)
Decrease in consumer batteries(9)
Decrease in small appliances(27)
Foreign currency impact, net(19)
Fiscal 2013 Net Sales$4,086

Consolidated net sales by product line for Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 are as follows (in millions):

35


  Fiscal Year
  2013 2012
Product line net sales    
Consumer batteries $932
 $949
Hardware and home improvement products 870
 
Small appliances 740
 772
Pet supplies 622
 615
Home and garden control products 390
 387
Electric shaving and grooming products 277
 279
Electric personal care products 255
 250
Total net sales to external customers $4,086
 $3,252

Global consumer battery sales decreased $17 million, or 2%, during Fiscal 2013 compared to Fiscal 2012. Excluding the impact of negative foreign exchange of $8 million, global consumer battery sales decreased $9 million. The constant currency decrease in global consumer battery sales was primarily attributable to the non-recurrence of promotions, timing of holiday shipments and inventory management at key customers, tempered by new customer listings and expansion into new channels.
Small appliances sales decreased $32 million, or 4%, during Fiscal 2013 versus Fiscal 2012, primarily attributable to declines in North American sales of $45 million and negative foreign exchange impacts of $4 million, partially offset by a $17 million increase in European small appliance sales. The North American sales declines resulted from the planned exit of certain low margin products. Strong small appliances sales in Europe were driven by market share gains in the United Kingdom, regional expansion in both Eastern and Western Europe and successful new product introductions.
Pet supply sales increased$7 million, or 1%, during Fiscal 2013 versus Fiscal 2012, driven by increased companion animal sales of $16 million, tempered by a $4 million decline in aquatics sales and $5 million of negative foreign currency impacts. Gains in companion animal sales resulted from strong growth in the Dingo and FURminator brands, expansion in Europe, new product launches and the inclusion of FURminator sales during all of Fiscal 2013 as the acquisition was completed on December 22, 2011. The decline in aquatic sales was primarily due to a decline in tropical food and outdoor pond product sales in Europe as a result of a later arrival of the spring season due to cooler temperatures.
Home and garden product sales increased$3 million, or 1%, in Fiscal 2013 versus Fiscal 2012, driven by a $4 million increase in lawn and garden control sales resulting from an extension to the season due to favorable fall weather, combined with reduced returns and more efficient trade spending. The negative impact on household insect control sales due to a late spring season was offset by increased year over year fourth quarter sales driven by the extension of the season due to favorable fall weather and gains in the first quarter of Fiscal 2013 from new retail distribution. Also contributing to the sales gains was the inclusion of Black Flag sales during all of Fiscal 2013, as the acquisition was completed on October 31, 2011, and retail replenishment following strong retail sales in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012.
Electric shaving and grooming product sales decreased$2 million, or 1%, during Fiscal 2013 compared to Fiscal 2012, attributable to an $11 million decline in North American sales and $1 million of negative foreign currency impacts, partially offset by an increase of $10 million in European sales and a slight increase in Latin American sales. North American sales declined as a result of labor disruptions at U.S. ports of entry during the peak holiday period in Fiscal 2013, coupled with decreased retail space available for the product category at a major retailer and customer inventory management. European sales gains were driven by successful new product launches and promotions, market growth, increased distribution and customer gains. The gain in Latin American sales was driven by expansion in Brazil due to successful new product launches and distribution gains, tempered by lower sales to customers who export to Venezuela and import restrictions in Argentina.
Electric personal care sales increased$5 million, or 2%, in Fiscal 2013 versus Fiscal 2012, resulting from a sales increase of $8 million in Europe, driven by new innovative products, coupled with additional distribution channels and customer gains. The gains were tempered by a $3 million decline in Latin American sales, resulting from decreased promotions and lower sales to customers who export to Venezuela, partially offset by distribution gains in Brazil and Central America.
Hardware and home improvement sales were $870 million for Fiscal 2013, reflecting the results of the HHI Business, subsequent to the acquisition on December 17, 2012. The results of TLM Taiwan are included in the results of hardware and home improvement sales subsequent to its acquisition on April 8, 2013.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for Fiscal 2013 was $1,390 million versus $1,116 million for Fiscal 2012. The increase in gross

36


profit was driven by the acquisition of the HHI Business which contributed $273 million in Gross profit in Fiscal 2013. Our gross profit margin for Fiscal 2013 decreased slightly to 34.0% from 34.3% in Fiscal 2012. The slight decline in gross profit margin was driven by a $31 million increase to cost of goods sold due to the sale of inventory which was revalued2015, in connection with the acquisition of AAG, we issued $1,000 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% unsecured notes due 2025 (the “5.75% Notes”). On June 23, 2015, we entered into term loan facilities pursuant to a Senior Credit Agreement consisting of (i) a $1,450 million USD Term Loan due June 23, 2022, (ii) a $75 million CAD Term Loan due June 23, 2022 and (iii) a €300 million Euro Term Loan due June 23, 2022, (collectively, “Term Loans”) and (iv) entered into a $500 million Revolver Facility due June 23, 2020 (the “Revolver”). The proceeds from the HHI Business,Term Loans and draws on the Revolver were used to repay our then-existing senior term credit facility, repay our outstanding 6.75% senior unsecured notes due 2020, repay and replace our then-existing asset based revolving loan (“ABL”) facility and to pay fees and expenses in connection with the refinancing and for general corporate purposes. Additionally, on December 3, 2014, we issued $250 million aggregate principal amount of 6.12% unsecured notes due 2024 (the “6.125% Notes”). The proceeds from the 6.125% Notes were used to fund acquisition activity, pay fees and expenses in connection with the financing and general corporate purposes.

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company amended its then-existing senior term credit facility, issuing two tranches maturing September 4, 2019 which offset improvementsprovide for borrowings in the principal amounts of $215.0 million and €225.0 million. The proceeds from the amendment were used to refinance a portion of the then-existing senior term credit facility which was scheduled to mature December 17, 2019, in an amount outstanding of $513.3 million prior to refinancing. The $215.0 million U.S. dollar denominated portion was combined with the then-existing Tranche C maturing September 4, 2019. These loans were refinanced during the year ended September 30, 2015 as described above. 

42


Consolidated Results of Operations

The following is summarized consolidated results of operations for SBH for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except %)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Variance

 

2015

 

2014

 

Variance

Net sales

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

349.3 

 

7.4% 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

 

$

261.3 

 

5.9% 

Gross Profit

 

 

1,919.9 

 

 

1,670.3 

 

 

249.6 

 

14.9% 

 

 

1,670.3 

 

 

1,568.9 

 

 

101.4 

 

6.5% 

Operating expenses

 

 

1,263.7 

 

 

1,196.2 

 

 

67.5 

 

5.6% 

 

 

1,196.2 

 

 

1,087.0 

 

 

109.2 

 

10.0% 

Interest expense

 

 

250.0 

 

 

271.9 

 

 

(21.9)

 

(8.1%)

 

 

271.9 

 

 

202.1 

 

 

69.8 

 

34.5% 

Income tax expense

 

 

40.0 

 

 

43.9 

 

 

(3.9)

 

(8.9%)

 

 

43.9 

 

 

59.0 

 

 

(15.1)

 

(25.6%)

Net income

 

 

357.6 

 

 

149.4 

 

 

208.2 

 

139.4% 

 

 

149.4 

 

 

214.5 

 

 

(65.1)

 

(30.3%)

Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $349.3 million, or 7.4%, compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. Organic net sales for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $123.7 million, or 2.6%, compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. Net sales for the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $261.3 million, or 5.9%, compared to the year ended September 30, 2014. Organic net sales for the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $91.1 million, or 2.1%, compared to the year ended September 30, 2014. Organic net sales excludes the impact of foreign currency translation and acquisitions, and is considered a non-GAAP measurement. See “Non-GAAP Measurements” section included elsewhere in this Annual Report for a reconciliation of Net Sales to organic net sales. The following sets forth net sales by segment for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except %)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Variance

 

2015

 

2014

 

Variance

Consumer batteries

 

$

840.7 

 

$

829.5 

 

$

11.2 

 

1.4% 

 

$

829.5 

 

$

957.8 

 

$

(128.3)

 

(13.4%)

Small appliances

 

 

656.0 

 

 

734.6 

 

 

(78.6)

 

(10.7%)

 

 

734.6 

 

 

730.8 

 

 

3.8 

 

0.5% 

Personal care

 

 

513.6 

 

 

528.1 

 

 

(14.5)

 

(2.7%)

 

 

528.1 

 

 

542.1 

 

 

(14.0)

 

(2.6%)

Global Batteries & Appliances

 

 

2,010.3 

 

 

2,092.2 

 

 

(81.9)

 

(3.9%)

 

 

2,092.2 

 

 

2,230.7 

 

 

(138.5)

 

(6.2%)

Hardware & Home Improvement

 

 

1,241.0 

 

 

1,205.5 

 

 

35.5 

 

2.9% 

 

 

1,205.5 

 

 

1,166.0 

 

 

39.5 

 

3.4% 

Global Pet Supplies

 

 

825.7 

 

 

758.2 

 

 

67.5 

 

8.9% 

 

 

758.2 

 

 

600.5 

 

 

157.7 

 

26.3% 

Home & Garden

 

 

509.0 

 

 

474.0 

 

 

35.0 

 

7.4% 

 

 

474.0 

 

 

431.9 

 

 

42.1 

 

9.7% 

Global Auto Care

 

 

453.7 

 

 

160.5 

 

 

293.2 

 

182.7% 

 

 

160.5 

 

 

 

 

160.5 

 

Net Sales

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

 

349.3 

 

7.4% 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

 

 

261.3 

 

5.9% 

The following sets forth the principal components of change in net sales from the year ended September 30, 2016 to the year ended September 30, 2015, and from the year ended September 30, 2015 to the year ended September 30, 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

Net Sales for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

Acquisition of AAG

 

 

277.3 

 

 

160.5 

Acquisition of European IAMS and Eukanuba

 

 

44.2 

 

 

128.7 

Acquisition of Salix

 

 

30.3 

 

 

71.4 

Acquisition of Tell

 

 

 

 

39.4 

Increase (decrease) in consumer batteries

 

 

51.2 

 

 

(42.8)

Increase in personal care

 

 

12.9 

 

 

35.5 

(Decrease) increase in small appliances

 

 

(43.5)

 

 

51.3 

Increase in hardware & home improvement

 

 

50.2 

 

 

20.7 

Increase (decrease) in global pet supplies

 

 

1.2 

 

 

(15.8)

Increase in home & garden

 

 

35.1 

 

 

42.2 

Increase in global auto care

 

 

16.6 

 

 

Foreign currency impact, net

 

 

(126.2)

 

 

(229.8)

Net Sales for the years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

Gross Profit. Gross profit for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $249.6 million compared to the year ended September 30, 2015 primarily attributable to the increase in net sales and increase in gross profit resultingmargin. Gross profit margin increased from 35.6% to 38.1% contributed to by the exitAAG acquisition, and a shift towards higher margin product sales and continuing cost improvements across segments. Gross profit for the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $101.4 million compared to the year ended September 30, 2014 attributable to our increase in net sales. Gross profit margin increased from 35.4% to 35.6% primarily attributable to a shift towards higher margin product sales and cost improvement initiatives.

43


Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for Fiscal 2013 totaled $1,039the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $67.5 million or 5.6% compared to $814 million for Fiscal 2012. The $225 million increase in operating expenses during Fiscal 2013 isthe year ended September 30, 2015 primarily attributable to the acquisition of the HHI Business which accounted for $190 million in operating expenses and led to a $17 millionan increase in Acquisitionselling and general and administrative expenses of $89.4 million due to increased net sales, prior year acquisitions and increased share based compensation of $16.8 million; offset by decreased acquisition & integration related charges. Furthermore, we incurred a $14charges of $22.1 million increase in Restructuringand decreased restructuring and related charges of $11.9 million. Operating expenses for the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $109.2 million or 10.0% primarily attributable to an increase of $59.7 million in selling and general and administrative expenses as a result of acquisition activity and increased net sales, increased acquisition and integration costs of $38.7 million and increased restructuring and related charges of $7.4 million for new and continuing restructuring initiatives.

See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Acquisitions”, included elsewhere within this Annual Report, for additional detail on acquisition and integration costs. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Restructuring and Related Charges”, included elsewhere within this Annual Report, for additional detail on restructuring activity and related costs.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the year ended September 30, 2016 decreased $21.9 million or 8.1% from the year ended September 30, 2015, attributable to the refinancing activity during the year ended September 30, 2015 previously discussed, coupled with payments on Term Loans; partially offset by $21.4 million of non-recurring costs due to refinancing activity during the year ended September 30, 2016, including (i) $15.6 million tendedr premium upon the repayment of 6.375% senior unsecured notes; and (iii) $5.8 million non-cash expense for the write-off of debt issuance costs associated with the repayment of 6.375% senior unsecured notes. Interest expense for the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $69.8 million or 34.5% from the year ended September 30, 2014, attributable to refinancing activity previously discussed, resulting in $58.8 million of non-recurring costs, including (i) $14.1 million for bridge financing commitments associated with the AAG acquisition, (ii) $4.5 million interest on assumed AAG senior notes from the date of the acquisition through payoff in June 2015, (iii) $16.9 million call premium upon the repayment of 6.75% senior unsecured notes; (iv) $4.1 million non-cash expense for the write-off of debt issuance costs associated with the repayment of 6.75% senior unsecured notes; (v) $10.4 million in fees associated with refinancing the then-existing senior term credit facility; and (vi) $8.8 million non-cash expense for the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees and discounts on the then-existing senior credit facility and ABL revolving loan facility. See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Debt”, included elsewhere within this Annual Report, for additional information regarding our outstanding debt.

Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 10.1% for the year ended September 30, 2016 compared to 22.7% for the year ended September 30, 2015. Our estimated annual effective tax rate applied to these periods differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the release of valuation allowances on U.S. net operating losses deferred tax assets and income earned outside the U.S. that is subject to statutory rates lower than 35% offsetting tax expense on U.S. pretax income. Our effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 2016 includes a $25.5 million expense to record a tax contingency reserve for a tax exposure in Germany. During the year, a local court ruled against our characterization of certain assets as amortizable under Germany tax law. We have appealed this ruling to the German Federal Court. While we continue to believe that our tax treatment was correct under the applicable German law, we have concluded that sufficient uncertainty on the ruling from the German Federal Court exists to record a full tax contingency for this exposure. Also included are $25.1 million of tax benefits, resulting from the adoption of ASU 2016-09. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Significant Accounting Policies and Practices”, included elsewhere in this Annual Report, for additional discussion and detail over the adoption of ASU 2016-09. In December 2015, the Company received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service which resulted in $87.8 million of U.S. net operating losses being restored. The ruling created additional U.S. deferred tax assets and valuation allowance.

The Company released $111.1 million of domestic valuation allowance during the year ended September 30, 2016. Approximately $25.1 million of the domestic valuation allowance release results from additional deferred tax assets created by the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, effective as of October 1, 2015. In December 2015, the Company received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) which resulted in $87.8 million of U.S. net operating losses being restored and a release of $16.2 million of domestic valuation allowance from additional deferred tax assets created by the IRS ruling. The Company recorded tax expense of $3.1 million rlated to additional foreign valuation allowance during the year ended September 30, 2016.

Our effective tax rate was 22.7% for the year ended September 30, 2015 compared to 21.6% for the year ended September 30, 2014. Our estimated annual effective tax rate applied to these periods differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to income earned outside the U.S. that is subject to statutory rates lower than 35% and the release of valuation allowances on U.S. net operating losses deferred tax assets offsetting tax expense on U.S. pretax income. During the year ended September 30, 2015, we also recorded U.S. deferred income tax expense related to the Global Expense Rationalization initiatives announcedchange in Fiscal 2013 andbook versus tax basis of indefinite-lived intangibles, which are amortized for tax purposes but not for book purposes. Additionally for the year ended September 30, 2015, we recorded a $15tax benefit of $22.8 million increasefor the reversal of a portion of the U.S. valuation allowance on deferred tax assets as a result of the AAG acquisition. For the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company also recognized $23.3 million of deferred tax assets related to its investment in stock compensation expense. These increases were tempered by $7 millionone of its foreign subsidiaries, because that timing difference was expected to reverse in savings across all segments from our cost reduction initiatives and positive foreign exchange impacts of $4 million.

the foreseeable future, but due to the U.S. valuation allowance against deferred tax assets there was no net tax benefit for this item.

See Note 2, "Significant Accounting Policies—Acquisition and Integration Related Charges",14, “Income Taxes,” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our Acquisition and integration charges.income taxes.

44


See Note 14, "Restructuring and Related Charges",

Table of Notes to ConsolidatedContents

Segment Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our Restructuring and related charges.


Segment Results.Data As discussed above, we manage our business in four reportable segments: (i) 

Global Batteries & Appliances; (ii) Global Pet Supplies; (iii) our HomeAppliances (GBA)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except %)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Variance

 

2015

 

2014

 

Variance

Net Sales

 

$

2,010.3 

 

$

2,092.2 

 

$

(81.9)

 

(3.9%)

 

$

2,092.2 

 

$

2,230.7 

 

$

(138.5)

 

(6.2%)

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

311.4 

 

 

306.9 

 

 

4.5 

 

1.5% 

 

 

306.9 

 

 

326.6 

 

 

(19.7)

 

(6.0%)

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

 

 

15.5% 

 

 

14.7% 

 

 

80 

bps

 

 

 

14.7% 

 

 

14.6% 

 

 

10 

bps

 

Net sales decreased $81.9 million, or 3.9%, during the year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. Organic net sales increased $20.6 million, or 1.0%. Net sales decreased $138.5 million, or 6.2%, during the year ended September 30, 2015 compared to the year ended September 30, 2014. Organic net sales increased $44.0 million, or 2.0%.

Consumer battery organic net sales increased $51.2 million, or 6.2%, for the year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the year ended September 30, 2015; primarily attributable to increases in North America of $6.9 million due to an increase in alkaline battery volumes from branded and Garden Business;private label product, increases in Europe of $33.8 million primarily from an increase in alkaline battery sales of $17.5 million driven by promotional sales volumes, increased e-commerce and (iv) new private label customers; an increase in hearing aid and specialty batteries of $14.9 million from increased hearing aid battery volumes with new and existing customers coupled with increases in portable power sales; and increases in Latin America of $9.7 million primarily from hearing aid and specialty batteries. Consumer battery organic net sales decreased $42.8 million, or 4.5%, for the year ended September 30, 2015 compared to the year ended September 30, 2014; primarily attributable to decreases in North America sales of $75.8 million due to lower alkaline batteries sales of $54.6 million from continued competitor discounting coupled with a retail customer bankruptcy, and a decrease in specialty batteries and lights from distribution loss to a competitor at a major retailer and timing of holiday sales; partially offset by an increase in Europe sales of $29.4 million from increased alkaline batteries sales of $24.4 million from increased volumes with new and existing retailers and private label customers, increased volumes in specialty and hearing aid batteries, plus increased lights from new products and promotional activity.

Small appliances organic net sales decreased $43.5 million, or 5.9%, for the year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the year ended September 30, 2015; primarily attributable to decreases of organic net sales in North America of $43.8 million due to softer point of sale within the category, reduction in retail inventory, shifting of holiday sales, and competitive pricing. Small appliances organic net sales increased $51.3 million, or 7.0% for the year ended September 30, 2015 compared to the year ended September 30, 2014; driven by increased sales in North America of $25.1 million attributable to the success of new product launches; increase in Europe sales of $24.9 million from promotional activity; and Latin America sales of $2.0 million from new product introductions and volume increases in certain product lines.

Personal care organic net sales increased $12.9 million, or 2.4%, for the year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the year ended September 30, 2015; primarily attributable to an increase in Europe of $13.0 million and Latin America of $9.5 million from higher volume due to promotional sales and market expansion; offset by decrease in North America of $13.9 million for softer point of sales in the category, reduction in retail inventory, shifting of holiday sales and competitive pricing. Personal care organic net sales increased $35.5 million, or 6.5%, for the year ended September 30, 2015 compared to the year ended September 30, 2014; driven by increased sales in North America of $11.6 million as a result of display location changes at a major customer, promotional activity and continued growth in e-commerce; increased Europe sales of $16.6 million due to new product sales and expansion in Eastern European markets; and increased Latin America sales of $5.3 million from growth in Mexico, new customers and effective promotional sales within the region.

Adjusted EBITDA in the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $4.5 million and the Adjusted EBITDA margin improved 80 bps compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. Adjusted EBITDA increased primarily due to the increase in net sales discussed above, cost improvement and better product mix, offset by negative foreign currency impact of $76.5 million. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA margin is due to improved product mix and cost improvements. Adjusted EBITDA in the year ended September 30, 2015 decreased $19.7 million and the Adjusted EBITDA margin improved by 10 bps compared to the year ended September 30, 2014. Adjusted EBITDA decreased primarily due to decreased sales discussed above, which was partially offset by cost improvements and favorable product mix. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased due to cost improvements and product mix. See Non-GAAP Measurements for reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA by segment.

45


Hardware & Home Improvement.Improvement (HHI)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except %)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Variance

 

2015

 

2014

 

Variance

Net Sales

 

$

1,241.0 

 

$

1,205.5 

 

$

35.5 

 

2.9% 

 

$

1,205.5 

 

$

1,166.0 

 

$

39.5 

 

3.4% 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

241.6 

 

 

225.5 

 

 

16.1 

 

7.1% 

 

 

225.5 

 

 

210.3 

 

 

15.2 

 

7.2% 

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

 

 

19.5% 

 

 

18.7% 

 

 

80 

bps

 

 

 

18.7% 

 

 

18.0% 

 

 

70 

bps

 

Net sales increased $35.5 million, or 2.9%, for the year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. Organic net sales increased $50.2 million, or 4.2%, attributable to increases in the security product category of $40.0 million from an increase in point of sale, new product listings with key retail customers, increases in e-commerce volumes, and market growth with non-retail customers, partially offset by a  $5.5 million decrease in sales with private label customers due to the transition in production of higher-margin branded product; an increase in plumbing products of $14.7 million from the introduction of new products and promotional volumes with key retail customers; partially offset by a $3.7 million decrease in hardware products driven by a  $22.8 million decrease for the expiration of a customer tolling agreement and planned exit of unprofitable businesses, mitigated by volume growth at existing retail and market expansion with non-retail customers in North America. Net sales for the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $39.5 million, or 3.4%, compared to the year ended September 30, 2014. Organic net sales increased $20.7 million, or 1.8%, due to an increase in North America sales as a result of higher domestic security and plumbing sales from retailers due to customer gains and from non-retailers through pricing and market growth, offset by a decrease in sales in APAC of $14.2 million driven by the exit of low margin products and the expiration of a customer tolling agreement.

Adjusted EBITDA in the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $16.1 million while Adjusted EBITDA margin increased by 80 bps from the year ended September, 2015. Adjusted EBITDA increased primarily due to the increase in net sales discussed above and cost improvements. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased due to cost improvements, partially offset by increased investment towards growth in emerging markets for electronics and e-commerce. Adjusted EBITDA in the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $15.2 million while the Adjusted EBITDA margin improved by 70 bps compared to the year ended September 30, 2014. Adjusted EBITDA increased due to the increase in net sales discussed above. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased due to cost improvements.

Global Pet Supplies (PET)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except %)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Variance

 

2015

 

2014

 

Variance

Net Sales

 

$

825.7 

 

$

758.2 

 

$

67.5 

 

8.9% 

 

$

758.2 

 

$

600.5 

 

$

157.7 

 

26.3% 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

140.1 

 

 

124.5 

 

 

15.6 

 

12.5% 

 

 

124.5 

 

 

113.2 

 

 

11.3 

 

10.0% 

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

 

 

17.0% 

 

 

16.4% 

 

 

60 

bps

 

 

 

16.4% 

 

 

18.9% 

 

 

(250)

bps

 

Net sales increased $67.5 million, or 8.9%, for the year ended September 30, 2016 compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. Organic net sales increased $1.2 million, 0.2%, primarily due to increases in aquatic sales of $1.1 million from timing of prior year holiday shipments, partially offset with the exit of lower margin business; while companion animal and pet food sales were consistent to prior year due to increased competition at key retailers, offset by growth with independent pet retailers, timing of promotional activity, and exiting of certain private label business. Net sales increased $157.7 million, or 26.3%, for the year ended September 30, 2015, compared to the year ended September 30, 2014, including $200.1 million of acquisition sales. Organic net sales decreased $15.8 million, or 2.6%, primarily due to decreases in aquatic sales of $12.8 million.

Adjusted EBITDA in the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $15.6 million, while Adjusted EBITDA margin increased by 60 bps compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. Adjusted EBITDA increased primarily due to acquisitions sales previously discussed and cost improvements. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased due to cost improvements and contributing margins from prior year acquisitions. Adjusted EBITDA in the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $11.3 million and the Adjusted EBITDA margin declined by 250 bps from the year ended September 30, 2014. The operating segment profits do not include restructuringincrease in Adjusted EBITDA was due to increase in net sales previously discussed. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA margin is due to increased product costs due to product mix.

46


Home & Garden (H&G)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except %)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Variance

 

2015

 

2014

 

Variance

Net Sales

 

$

509.0 

 

$

474.0 

 

$

35.0 

 

7.4% 

 

$

474.0 

 

$

431.9 

 

$

42.1 

 

9.7% 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

138.3 

 

 

124.5 

 

 

13.8 

 

11.1% 

 

 

124.5 

 

 

101.8 

 

 

22.7 

 

22.3% 

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

 

 

27.2% 

 

 

26.3% 

 

 

90 

bps

 

 

 

26.3% 

 

 

23.6% 

 

 

270 

bps

 

Net sales for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $35.0 million, or 7.4%, compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. The increase is attributable to repellent products growth of $15.7 million due to volume growth with key retailers and related charges,increased demand in response to the Zika virus; an increase in lawn and garden control products of $9.0 million from an extended outdoor season due to warmer weather and early season retail shipments; and an increase in household insect control products of $10.3 million from volume growth with key retailers. Net sales for the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $42.1 million, or 9.7%, compared to the year ended September 30, 2014. The increase is attributable to increases in repellent products of $16.2 million, lawn and garden control products of $13.1 million and household insect control products of $12.8 million. The sales increase for all categories within home and garden was a result of distribution gains, strong point of sale activity driving replenishment orders at existing customer and market share gains on certain brands.

Adjusted EBITDA in the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $13.8 million with an increase in Adjusted EBITDA margin of 90 bps compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. Adjusted EBITDA increased primarily due to the increase in net sales discussed above and cost improvements. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA margin was due to cost improvements. Adjusted EBITDA in the year ended September 30, 2015 increased $22.7 million with an improvement in Adjusted EBITDA margin of 270 bps as compared to the year ended September 30, 2014. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA is primarily due to increases in net sales discussed above and cost improvements. The adjusted EBITDA margin increase is due to improved product mix, and cost improvements.

Global Auto Care (GAC)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except %)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Variance

 

2015

 

2014

 

Variance

Net Sales

 

$

453.7 

 

$

160.5 

 

$

293.2 

 

182.7% 

 

$

160.5 

 

$

 

$

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

153.4 

 

 

47.3 

 

 

106.1 

 

224.3% 

 

 

47.3 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

 

 

33.8% 

 

 

29.5% 

 

 

430 

bps

 

 

 

29.5% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $293.2 million, including acquisition sales of $277.3 million, compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. For the period of May 21, 2016 through September 30, 2016, organic net sales increased $16.6 million, or 10.3%, compared to the period of May 21, 2015 through September 30, 2015, primarily driven by increased sales from A/C recharge and integration related charges, interest expense, interest incomerefrigerant products and income tax expense. Corporate expensesthe introduction of private label products with a key customer. Net sales for the year ended September 30, 2015 relate to the acquired AAG business subsequent to the acquisition date of May 21, 2015.

Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended September 30, 2016 increased $106.1 million compared to the year ended September 30, 2015. For the period of May 21, 2016 through September 30, 2016, Adjusted EBITDA increased $10.5 million, or 22%, compared to the period of May 21, 2015 through September 30, 2015, primarily include general and administrativedue to increases in net sales discussed above. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased 430bps due to reduced operating expenses and global long-term incentive compensation plans whichcost improvements from post integration synergies.

Non-GAAP Measurements

While management believes that non-GAAP measurements are evaluated on a consolidated basis and not allocated to our operating segments. All depreciation and amortization included in income from operations is related to operating segments or corporate expense. Costs are allocated to operating segments or corporate expense according to the function of each cost center.

All capital expenditures are related to operating segments. Variable allocations of assetsuseful supplemental information, such adjusted results are not madeintended to replace the Company’s GAAP financial results. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Organic Net Sales are measures that are not prescribed by US GAAP. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Organic Net Sales are further defined below, including reconciliation to their most directly comparable GAAP measurement. As such, we encourage investors not to use these measures as substitutes for the determination of net income, net sales or other similar GAAP measures.

Adjusted EBITDA. Our consolidated and segment reporting.

Financialresults include financial information pertaining to our reportable segments is contained in Note 11, "Segment Information", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
regarding Adjusted EBITDA (“Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization ("Amortization”), which are non-GAAP earnings. Adjusted EBITDA")EBITDA is a metric used by management and frequently used bywe believe this non-GAAP measure provides useful information to investors because it reflects ongoing operating performance and trends of our segments, excluding certain non-cash based expenses and/or non-recurring items during each of the financial community which provides insight into an organization’s operating trendscomparable periods and facilitates comparisons between peer companies since interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization can differ greatly between organizations as a result of differing capital structures and tax strategies. Further, Adjusted EBITDA can also beis a useful measure of a company’s ability to service debt and is one of the measuresmeasure used for determining ourthe Company’s debt covenant compliance.covenant. EBITDA is calculated by excluding the Company’s income tax expense, interest expense, depreciation expense and amortization expense (from intangible assets) from net income. Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain itemsfurther excludes: (1) stock based compensation expense as it is a non-cash based compensation cost; (2) acquisition and integration costs that are unusualconsist of transaction costs from acquisition transactions during the period or subsequent integration related project costs directly associated with the acquired business; (3) restructuring and related costs, which consist of project costs associated with restructuring initiatives across the segments; (4) non-cash purchase accounting inventory adjustments

47


recognized in natureearnings subsequent to an acquisition; (5) non-cash asset impairments or not comparable from period to period. While we believe that Adjusted EBITDAwrite-offs realized; (6) and other adjustments. During the year ended September 30, 2016, other adjustments consisted of costs associated with the onboarding a key executive and the involuntary transfer of inventory. During the year ended September 30, 2015, other consisted of costs associated with the exiting of a key executive, coupled with onboarding a key executive, plus the Company recognized a non-recurring adjustment for the devaluation of cash and cash equivalents denominated in Venezuelan currency. During the year ended September 30, 2014, other consisted of costs associated with the existing of a key executive.

The following is useful supplemental information, such adjusted results are not intended to replace our Generally Accepted Accounting Principles’ (“GAAP”) financial results and should be read in conjunction with those GAAP results.


Below are reconciliationsa reconciliation of GAAP Netnet income (loss), as adjusted, to Adjusted Earnings Before Interest and Taxes ("Adjusted EBIT") and to Adjusted EBITDA for each segmentthe years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 for Consolidated SB Holdings for Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012SBH:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SBH (in millions)

 

GBA

 

HHI

 

PET

 

H&G

 

GAC

 

Corporate

 

Consolidated

For the Year Ended September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

232.9 

 

$

190.6 

 

$

84.2 

 

$

121.2 

 

$

116.6 

 

$

(387.9)

 

$

357.6 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40.0 

 

 

40.0 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

250.0 

 

 

250.0 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

72.2 

 

 

35.4 

 

 

42.7 

 

 

15.2 

 

 

17.5 

 

 

 

 

183.0 

EBITDA

 

 

305.1 

 

 

226.0 

 

 

126.9 

 

 

136.4 

 

 

134.1 

 

 

(97.9)

 

 

830.6 

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64.4 

 

 

64.4 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

2.6 

 

 

13.3 

 

 

5.5 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

14.0 

 

 

0.8 

 

 

36.7 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

1.2 

 

 

2.3 

 

 

6.0 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

5.3 

 

 

 

 

15.2 

Write-off from impairment of intangible assets

 

 

2.0 

 

 

 

 

1.7 

 

 

1.0 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.7 

Other

 

 

0.5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7 

 

 

1.2 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

311.4 

 

$

241.6 

 

$

140.1 

 

$

138.3 

 

$

153.4 

 

$

(32.0)

 

$

952.8 

For the Year Ended September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

219.6 

 

$

166.5 

 

$

60.0 

 

$

108.3 

 

$

18.2 

 

$

(423.2)

 

$

149.4 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43.9 

 

 

43.9 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

271.9 

 

 

271.9 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

71.0 

 

 

39.4 

 

 

39.7 

 

 

13.3 

 

 

6.6 

 

 

 

 

170.0 

EBITDA

 

 

290.6 

 

 

205.9 

 

 

99.7 

 

 

121.6 

 

 

24.8 

 

 

(107.4)

 

 

635.2 

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47.6 

 

 

47.6 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

4.6 

 

 

9.1 

 

 

13.7 

 

 

2.3 

 

 

3.8 

 

 

25.3 

 

 

58.8 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

9.2 

 

 

9.7 

 

 

8.9 

 

 

0.6 

 

 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

28.7 

Purchase accounting inventory adjustment

 

 

 

 

0.8 

 

 

2.2 

 

 

 

 

18.7 

 

 

 

 

21.7 

Venezuela Devaluation

 

 

2.5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.1 

 

 

6.1 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

306.9 

 

$

225.5 

 

$

124.5 

 

$

124.5 

 

$

47.3 

 

$

(28.1)

 

$

800.6 

For the Year Ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

234.6 

 

$

157.2 

 

$

78.7 

 

$

88.1 

 

$

 

$

(344.1)

 

$

214.5 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59.0 

 

 

59.0 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

202.1 

 

 

202.1 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

73.1 

 

 

40.4 

 

 

31.5 

 

 

12.6 

 

 

 

 

 

 

157.6 

EBITDA

 

 

307.7 

 

 

197.6 

 

 

110.2 

 

 

100.7 

 

 

 

 

(83.0)

 

 

633.2 

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.8 

 

 

46.8 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

7.8 

 

 

4.4 

 

 

 

 

1.1 

 

 

 

 

6.8 

 

 

20.1 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

11.1 

 

 

8.3 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

22.9 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3 

 

 

1.3 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

326.6 

 

$

210.3 

 

$

113.2 

 

$

101.8 

 

$

 

$

(27.6)

 

$

724.3 

37

48


The following is a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 for SB/RH:




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SB/RH (in millions)

 

GBA

 

HHI

 

PET

 

H&G

 

GAC

 

Corporate

 

Consolidated

For the Year Ended September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

232.9 

 

$

190.6 

 

$

84.2 

 

$

121.2 

 

$

116.6 

 

$

(393.2)

 

$

352.3 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51.0 

 

 

51.0 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

250.0 

 

 

250.0 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

72.2 

 

 

35.4 

 

 

42.7 

 

 

15.2 

 

 

17.5 

 

 

 

 

183.0 

EBITDA

 

 

305.1 

 

 

226.0 

 

 

126.9 

 

 

136.4 

 

 

134.1 

 

 

(92.2)

 

 

836.3 

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59.3 

 

 

59.3 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

2.6 

 

 

13.3 

 

 

5.5 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

14.0 

 

 

0.8 

 

 

36.7 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

1.2 

 

 

2.3 

 

 

6.0 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

5.3 

 

 

 

 

15.2 

Write-off from impairment of intangible assets

 

 

2.0 

 

 

 

 

1.7 

 

 

1.0 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.7 

Other

 

 

0.5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7 

 

 

1.2 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

311.4 

 

$

241.6 

 

$

140.1 

 

$

138.3 

 

$

153.4 

 

$

(31.4)

 

$

953.4 

For the Year Ended September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

219.6 

 

$

166.5 

 

$

60.0 

 

$

108.3 

 

$

18.2 

 

$

(416.8)

 

$

155.8 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43.9 

 

 

43.9 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

271.9 

 

 

271.9 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

71.0 

 

 

39.4 

 

 

39.7 

 

 

13.3 

 

 

6.6 

 

 

 

 

170.0 

EBITDA

 

 

290.6 

 

 

205.9 

 

 

99.7 

 

 

121.6 

 

 

24.8 

 

 

(101.0)

 

 

641.6 

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41.8 

 

 

41.8 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

4.6 

 

 

9.1 

 

 

13.7 

 

 

2.3 

 

 

3.8 

 

 

25.3 

 

 

58.8 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

9.2 

 

 

9.7 

 

 

8.9 

 

 

0.6 

 

 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

28.7 

Purchase accounting inventory adjustment

 

 

 

 

0.8 

 

 

2.2 

 

 

 

 

18.7 

 

 

 

 

21.7 

Venezuela devaluation

 

 

2.5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.1 

 

 

6.1 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

306.9 

 

$

225.5 

 

$

124.5 

 

$

124.5 

 

$

47.3 

 

$

(27.5)

 

$

801.2 

For the Year Ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

234.6 

 

$

157.2 

 

$

78.7 

 

$

88.1 

 

 

 

$

(341.5)

 

$

217.1 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59.0 

 

 

59.0 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

202.1 

 

 

202.1 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

73.1 

 

 

40.4 

 

 

31.5 

 

 

12.6 

 

 

 

 

 

 

157.6 

EBITDA

 

 

307.7 

 

 

197.6 

 

 

110.2 

 

 

100.7 

 

 

 

 

(80.4)

 

 

635.8 

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44.9 

 

 

44.9 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

7.8 

 

 

4.4 

 

 

 

 

1.1 

 

 

 

 

6.8 

 

 

20.1 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

11.1 

 

 

8.3 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

22.9 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3 

 

 

1.3 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

326.6 

 

$

210.3 

 

$

113.2 

 

$

101.8 

 

$

 

$

(26.9)

 

$

725.0 

Fiscal 2013
Global
Batteries &
Appliances
 
Global Pet
Supplies
 
Home and
Garden
Business
 Hardware & Home Improvement 
Corporate /
Unallocated
Items(a)
 
Consolidated
SB Holdings
 (in millions)
Net income (loss), as adjusted (a)
$214
 $77
 $78
 $75
 $(499) $(55)
Pre-acquisition earnings of HHI (b)

 
 
 30
 
 30
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 27
 27
Interest expense
 
 
 
 376
 376
Acquisition and integration related charges6
 2
 
 7
 33
 48
Restructuring and related charges15
 11
 1
 6
 1
 34
HHI Business inventory fair value adjustment
 
 
 31
 
 31
Venezuela devaluation2
 
 
 
 
 2
Adjusted EBIT$237
 $90
 $79
 $149
 $(62) $493
Depreciation and amortization (c)
67
 30
 11
 32
 44
 184
Adjusted EBITDA$304
 $120
 $90
 $181
 $(18) $677

Fiscal 2012
Global
Batteries &
Appliances
 
Global Pet
Supplies
 
Home and
Garden
Business
 Hardware & Home Improvement 
Corporate /
Unallocated
Items(a)
 
Consolidated
SB Holdings
 (in millions)
Net income (loss), as adjusted (a)
$221
 $70
 $71
 $
 $(313) $49
Pre-acquisition earnings of HHI (b)

 
 
 183
 
 183
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 60
 60
Interest expense
 
 
 
 192
 192
Acquisition and integration related charges15
 5
 2
 
 9
 31
Restructuring and related charges7
 10
 1
 
 1
 19
Adjusted EBIT$243
 $85
 $74
 $183
 $(51) $534
Depreciation and amortization (c)
64
 28
 13
 
 29
 134
Adjusted EBITDA$307
 $113
 $87
 $183
 $(22) $668

 ______________________________49

(a)It is the Company's policy to record Income tax expense and interest expense on a consolidated basis. Accordingly, such amounts are not reflected in the operating results of the operating segments and are presented within Corporate / Unallocated Items.
(b)The Pre-acquisition earnings of HHI do not include the TLM Taiwan business as stand alone financial data is not available for the periods presented. The TLM Taiwan business is not deemed material to the Company's operating results.
(c)Included within depreciation and amortization is amortization of unearned restricted stock compensation.

Global Batteries & Appliances
  Fiscal Year
  2013 2012
  
Net sales to external customers $2,204
 $2,250
Segment profit $238
 $244
Segment profit as a % of net sales 10.8% 10.9%
Segment Adjusted EBITDA $304
 $307
Assets as of September 30 $2,361
 $2,243

38




SegmentOrganic Net Sales. Our consolidated and segment results contain financial information regarding organic net sales, which we define as net sales excluding the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and impact from acquisitions. We believe this non-GAAP measure provides useful information to investors because it reflects regional and operating segment performance from our activities without the effect of changes in currency exchange rate and/or acquisitions. We use organic net sales as one measure to monitor and evaluate our regional and segment performance. Organic growth is calculated by comparing organic net sales to external customersnet sales in Fiscal 2013 decreased $46 millionthe prior year. The effect of changes in currency exchange rates is determined by translating the period’s net sales using the currency exchange rates that were in effect during the prior comparative period. Net sales are attributed to $2,204 millionthe geographic regions based on the country of destination. We exclude net sales from $2,250 million during Fiscal 2012,acquired businesses in the current year for which there are no comparable sales in the prior period. The following is a 2% decrease, driven by a $27 million decrease in small appliancereconciliation of reported net sales $14 million of negative foreign exchange impacts, a $9 million decrease in global consumer battery sales and a $1 million decrease in electric shaving and grooming sales. These declines were partially offset by an increase of $5 million in electric personal care sales. The decline in small appliance sales was predominately driven by North American sales declines of $45 million, partially offset by European sales gains of $17 million. The decrease in North American sales was driven by management initiatives to exit low margin products, driving an overall increase in profitability as a percentage oforganic net sales for the product category. Gains in European small applianceyear ended September 30, 2016 compared to net sales were driven by increased market share infor the United Kingdom, regional expansion in Eastern and Western Europe and successful new product lines. The declines in global consumer battery sales of $9 million resulted from the non-recurrence of promotions, inventory management at key vendorsyear ended September 30, 2015, and the timingreported net sales to organic net sales for the year ended September 30, 2015 compared to the year ended September 30, 2014 respectively:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year Ended
(in millions, except %)

 

Net Sales

 

Effect of Changes in Currency

 

Net Sales Excluding Effect of Changes in Currency

 

Effect of Acquisitions

 

Organic
Net Sales

 


Net Sales
September 30, 2015

 

Variance

Consumer batteries

 

$

840.7 

 

$

40.0 

 

$

880.7 

 

$

 

$

880.7 

 

$

829.5 

 

$

51.2 

 

6.2% 

Small appliances

 

 

656.0 

 

 

35.1 

 

 

691.1 

 

 

 

 

691.1 

 

 

734.6 

 

 

(43.5)

 

(5.9%)

Personal care

 

 

513.6 

 

 

27.4 

 

 

541.0 

 

 

 

 

541.0 

 

 

528.1 

 

 

12.9 

 

2.4% 

Global Batteries & Appliances

 

 

2,010.3 

 

 

102.5 

 

 

2,112.8 

 

 

 

 

2,112.8 

 

 

2,092.2 

 

 

20.6 

 

1.0% 

Hardware & Home Improvement

 

 

1,241.0 

 

 

14.7 

 

 

1,255.7 

 

 

 

 

1,255.7 

 

 

1,205.5 

 

 

50.2 

 

4.2% 

Global Pet Supplies

 

 

825.7 

 

 

8.2 

 

 

833.9 

 

 

(74.5)

 

 

759.4 

 

 

758.2 

 

 

1.2 

 

0.2% 

Home and Garden

 

 

509.0 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

509.1 

 

 

 

 

509.1 

 

 

474.0 

 

 

35.1 

 

7.4% 

Global Auto Care

 

 

453.7 

 

 

0.7 

 

 

454.4 

 

 

(277.3)

 

 

177.1 

 

 

160.5 

 

 

16.6 

 

10.3% 

Total

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

126.2 

 

$

5,165.9 

 

$

(351.8)

 

$

4,814.1 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

 

123.7 

 

2.6% 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended
(in millions, except %)

 

Net Sales

 

Effect of Changes in Currency

 

Net Sales Excluding Effect of Changes in Currency

 

Effect of Acquisitions

 

Organic
Net Sales

 

Net Sales
September 30, 2014

 

Variance

Consumer batteries

 

$

829.5 

 

$

85.5 

 

$

915.0 

 

$

 

$

915.0 

 

$

957.8 

 

$

(42.8)

 

(4.5%)

Small appliances

 

 

734.6 

 

 

47.5 

 

 

782.1 

 

 

 

 

782.1 

 

 

730.8 

 

 

51.3 

 

7.0% 

Personal care

 

 

528.1 

 

 

49.5 

 

 

577.6 

 

 

 

 

577.6 

 

 

542.1 

 

 

35.5 

 

6.5% 

Global Batteries & Appliances

 

 

2,092.2 

 

 

182.5 

 

 

2,274.7 

 

 

 

 

2,274.7 

 

 

2,230.7 

 

 

44.0 

 

2.0% 

Hardware & Home Improvement

 

 

1,205.5 

 

 

20.6 

 

 

1,226.1 

 

 

(39.4)

 

 

1,186.7 

 

 

1,166.0 

 

 

20.7 

 

1.8% 

Global Pet Supplies

 

 

758.2 

 

 

26.6 

 

 

784.8 

 

 

(200.1)

 

 

584.7 

 

 

600.5 

 

 

(15.8)

 

-2.6%

Home and Garden

 

 

474.0 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

474.1 

 

 

 

 

474.1 

 

 

431.9 

 

 

42.2 

 

9.8% 

Global Auto Care

 

 

160.5 

 

 

 

 

160.5 

 

 

(160.5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0% 

Total

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

229.8 

 

$

4,920.2 

 

$

(400.0)

 

$

4,520.2 

 

$

4,429.1 

 

 

91.1 

 

2.1% 

50


Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following is a summary of the Company’s cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

615.0 

 

$

444.3 

 

$

432.7 

 

$

601.6 

 

$

441.8 

 

$

434.7 

Net cash used by investing activities

 

$

(98.4)

 

$

(1,279.7)

 

$

(93.5)

 

$

(98.4)

 

$

(1,279.7)

 

$

(93.5)

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

 

$

(487.8)

 

$

918.4 

 

$

(343.5)

 

$

(478.9)

 

$

922.6 

 

$

(338.2)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

$

(1.4)

 

$

(29.7)

 

$

(8.3)

 

$

(1.4)

 

$

(29.7)

 

$

(8.3)

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Net cash provided by new customer listings and expansion into new channels. operating activities

The slight decrease in electric shaving and grooming sales was due to an $11$170.7 million decrease in North American sales, tempered by a $10 million increase in European sales. The decline in North American shaving and grooming product salescash provided by operating activities for the year ended September 30, 2016 was attributable to labor disruptions at U.S. ports(i) incremental cash generated from the segment operations of entry during the peak holiday period, coupled with decreased retail space available$166.7 million due to growth in net sales, acquisitions and cost management initiatives; including cash contributed through working capital primarily from decreases of receivables and inventory through working capital management initiatives; (ii) decrease in cash paid for interest of $12.0 million, excluding a non-recurring tender premium of $15.6 million for the product category at a major customerredemption of 6.375% Note, from decrease in annualized interest costs; and retailer inventory management. Gains(iii) decrease in the electric shaving and grooming product category in Europe were driven by successful new product launches and promotions, market growth, increased distributions and customer gains. Electric personal care product sales increased $5 million in Fiscal 2013 compared to Fiscal 2012, due to an increase of $8 million in Europe driven by innovative new product launches coupled with distribution and customer gains,cash paid for income taxes; which was partially offset by a sales decline(i) increase in cash paid towards restructuring and acquisition and integration related activities of $3$7.1 million towards integration of previously acquired businesses; and (ii) increased payments towards corporate expenditures of $3.9 million for increased compensation costs and investment in Latin America. Latin American sales declines wereshared services.

The $11.6 million increase in cash provided by operating activities for the year ended September 30, 2015, was attributable to the non-recurrence(i) cash generated from segment operations of Fiscal 2012 promotions$45.9 million due to increased net sales, continued cost management initiatives, offset by an incremental use of cash from working capital driven by higher inventory and lower sales to customers who export to Venezuela,other working capital items partially offset by distribution gainslower accounts receivable and higher accounts payable; (ii) decrease in Brazilcash paid for taxes of $26.3 million; and Central America.


Segment profit(iii) decrease in Fiscal 2013 decreased to $238cash paid for restructuring and related charges of $3.1 million; which was partially offset by (i) increased cash paid for acquisition and integration costs of $14.6 million from $244increased acquisition activity; (ii) increased cash paid for interest of $71.6 million in Fiscal 2012, primarily attributable due to unfavorable product mixcharges associated with financing the AAG acquisition and pricing pressures in the U.S, coupled with theincreased debt; and (iii) increased payments towards corporate expenditures of $0.5 million.

Net cash used by investing activities

The $1,181.3 million decrease in sales discussed above. Segment profitability as a percentage of net sales decreased slightly to 10.8% in Fiscal 2013 versus 10.9% in Fiscal 2012, drivencash used by unfavorable mix and pricing pressures in the U.S., which offset gains from the exit of low margin products in the small appliances category.

Segment Adjusted EBITDA in Fiscal 2013 decreased to $304 million from $307 million in Fiscal 2012. The decrease in segment Adjusted EBITDA was driven by the factors discussed above for the decline in segment profit.
Segment assets at September 30, 2013 increased to $2,361 million from $2,243 million at September 30, 2012. The increase is primarily due to the acquisition of Shaser. Goodwill and intangible assets, which are a direct result of the revaluation impacts of fresh-start reporting which occurredinvesting activities during the year ended September 30, 2009 ("Fiscal 2009") and acquisitions, increased to $1,322 million at September 30, 2013 from $1,261 million at September 30, 2012, primarily due to the acquisition of Shaser.
Global Pet Supplies
  Fiscal Year
  2013 2012
  
Net sales to external customers $622
 $615
Segment profit $91
 $86
Segment profit as a % of net sales 14.6% 14.0%
Segment Adjusted EBITDA $120
 $113
Assets as of September 30 $949
 $956

Segment net sales to external customers in Fiscal 2013 increased $7 million to $622 million compared to $615 million in Fiscal 2012 led by increased companion animal sales of $16 million, driven by growth in the Dingo and FURminator brands, expansion in Europe, new product launches and the full year impact of the FURminator acquisition. The increase in companion animal sales2016 was tempered by a $4 million decline in aquatics sales, primarily due to decreased sales for aquatic nutrition and pond water care products in Europe due to a delayed spring season. Foreign currency exchange negatively impacted pet supply sales in Fiscal 2013 by $5 million.

39


Segment profit increased $5 million to $91 million in Fiscal 2013 compared to $86 million in Fiscal 2012. Segment profitability as a percentage of sales in Fiscal 2013 increased to 14.6%, compared to 14.0% in the same period last year. The increase in segment profit and profitability as a percentage of sales was driven by cost improvements and operating expense reductions, which offset increased cost of goods sold and unfavorable product mix in Fiscal 2013 versus Fiscal 2012.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA in Fiscal 2013 increased $7 million, to $120 million, from $113 million in Fiscal 2012. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was driven by the factors discussed above for segment profit.
Segment assets at September 30, 2013 decreased slightly to $949 million from $956 million at September 30, 2012. Goodwill and intangible assets, which are substantially the result of the revaluation impacts of fresh-start reporting during Fiscal 2009 and acquisitions, decreased to $701 million at September 30, 2013 from $715 million at September 30, 2012 due to amortization of intangible assets, tempered by positive foreign exchange impacts.

Home and Garden Business
  Fiscal Year
  2013 2012
  
Net sales to external customers $390
 $387
Segment profit $78
 $74
Segment profit as a % of net sales 20.1% 19.0%
Segment Adjusted EBITDA $90
 $87
Assets as of September 30 $501
 $508

Segment net sales to external customers increased $3 million, or 1%, during Fiscal 2013, to $390 million, compared to $387 million in Fiscal 2012, resulting from an increase in lawn and garden control sales driven by warm fall weather during Fiscal 2013 which extended the selling season, combined with reduced returns and more efficient trade spending. Household insect control sales were flat in Fiscal 2013 compared to Fiscal 2012.
Segment profitability in Fiscal 2013 increased $4 million, to $78 million, from $74 million in Fiscal 2012, driven by the increase in lawn and garden control sales and strong expense management. Segment profitability as a percentage of net sales in Fiscal 2013 improved to 20.1%, from 19.0% in Fiscal 2012, as a result of strong expense management.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA improved $3 million to $90 million in Fiscal 2013 compared to segment Adjusted EBITDA of $87 million in Fiscal 2012 driven by the increase in net sales coupled with cost and operating expense improvements.
Segment assets at September 30, 2013 decreased to $501 million from $508 million at September 30, 2012. Goodwill and intangible assets, which are substantially a result of the revaluation impacts of fresh-start reporting during Fiscal 2009 and acquisitions, decreased to $426 million at September 30, 2013, from $433 million at September 30, 2012, driven by amortization of intangible assets.

Hardware & Home Improvement
  Fiscal Year
  2013
  
Net sales to external customers $870
Segment profit $89
Segment profit as a % of net sales 10.2%
Segment Adjusted EBITDA $181
Assets as of September 30 $1,736

Results of the HHI Business, reported as a separate business segment, Hardware & Home Improvement relate to operations subsequent to the acquisition date, December 17, 2012. The results of TLM Taiwan are reflected in the Hardware &

40


Home Improvement segment subsequent to its acquisition on April 8, 2013.
Segment net sales to external customers were $870 million in Fiscal 2013. Proforma net sales for Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of both periods were $1,062 million and $974 million, respectively. The Fiscal 2013 sales growth was driven by double-digit improvements in the HHI Business' U.S. residential security and plumbing categories due to the housing market recovery.
Segment profit in Fiscal 2013 was $89 million. Segment profitability as a percentage of sales in Fiscal 2013 was 10.2%. Segment profitability was negatively impacted by a $31 million increase to cost of goods sold due to the sale of inventory which was revalued in connection with the acquisition.
Including pre-acquisition earnings of the HHI Business, segment Adjusted EBITDA was $181 million in Fiscal 2013.
Segment assets at September 30, 2013 were $1,736 million. Goodwill and intangible assets were $1,192 million at September 30, 2013.
See Note 15, “Acquisitions” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the HHI Business acquisition.
Corporate Expense. Our corporate expense was $62 million in Fiscal 2013 compared to $52 million in Fiscal 2012. This increase is primarily attributable to a $15 million increase in stock based compensation expense, tempered by operating expense improvements. Corporate expense as a percentage of consolidated net sales for Fiscal 2013 decreased slightly to 1.5% versus 1.6% for Fiscal 2012, driven by the operating expense improvements discussed above and the addition of the HHI Business during Fiscal 2013.
Acquisition and Integration Related Charges. Acquisition and integration related charges include, but are not limited to, transaction costs such as banking, legal and accounting professional fees directly related to acquisitions, termination and related costs for transitional and certain other employees, integration related professional fees and other post business combination related expenses associated with our acquisitions. See Note 2, "Significant Accounting Policies—Acquisition and Integration Related Charges", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our Acquisition and integration charges.

Restructuring and Related Charges. See Note 14, "Restructuring and Related Charges", to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding our restructuring and related charges.
Interest Expense. Interest expense in Fiscal 2013 was $376 million compared to $192 million in Fiscal 2012. The increase in interest expense in Fiscal 2013 of $184 million is primarily due to costs and expenses related to the extinguishment of our 9.5% Notes and the financing of the acquisition of the HHI Business coupled with higher ongoing interest expense related to the debt issued in connection with that acquisition, partially offset by the non-recurrence of costs and expenses related to the extinguishment of our 12% Notes in Fiscal 2012. We incurred $122 million of costs related to the extinguishment of our 9.5% Notes including cash tender, consent and redemption premium costs totaling $111 million and non-cash costs for the write off of unamortized deferred financing fees less unamortized original issue premium totaling $11 million. We incurred $29 million in costs and expenses related to the acquisition financing for the HHI Business including cash costs of $24 million for bridge financing fees, interest incurred prior to closing and transaction costs, along with non-cash costs of $5 million related to the write-off of debt issuance costs and original issue discount on the former term loan facility. In addition, we incurred $69 million of ongoing cash interest expense related to the debt incurred for the acquisition of the HHI Business. The higher expense incurred in Fiscal 2013 was partially offset by the non-recurrence of $25 million of cash and $2 million of non-cash costs incurred in connection with the extinguishment of our 12% Notes, savings related to the extinguishments of the 12% Notes and the 9.5% Notes coupled with other items netting to reduced interest of $9 million. See Note 6, "Debt", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Income Taxes. In Fiscal 2013, we recorded income tax expense of $27 million on a pretax loss from continuing operations of $28 million, and in Fiscal 2012, we recorded income tax expense of $60 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $109 million. Our effective tax rate on our loss from continuing operations was approximately (98)% for Fiscal 2013. Our effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was approximately 55% for Fiscal 2012. Our effective tax rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% principally due to: (i) losses in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit can be recognized due to full valuation allowances that have been provided on our net operating loss carryforward tax benefits and other deferred tax assets; (ii) deferred income tax expense related to the change in book versus tax basis of indefinite lived intangibles, which are amortized for tax purposes but not for book purposes, and (iii) the reversal in Fiscal 2013 of U.S. valuation allowances of $50 million on deferred tax assets as a result of the acquisition of the HHI Business and the reversal in Fiscal 2012 of U.S. valuation allowances of $15 million on deferred tax assets as a result of

41


the FURminator acquisition. Additionally, in Fiscal 2013, the consolidated pretax income was close to break even, resulting in a higher effective tax rate as this rate is calculated by dividing tax expense into pretax income (loss).
In light of our plans to voluntarily pay down our U.S. debt, fund distributions to shareholders, fund U.S. acquisitions, and our ongoing U.S. operational cash flow requirements, in Fiscal 2012 we began recording residual U.S. and foreign taxes on current foreign earnings, which we do not consider to be permanently reinvested, except for locations precluded by local legal restrictions from repatriating earnings. We evaluate annually the available earnings, permanent reinvestment classification, and availability and intent to use alternative mechanisms for repatriation for each jurisdiction in which we do business. As of September 30, 2013, we have provided residual taxes on approximately $46 million of earnings not yet taxed in the U.S. Due to the valuation allowance recorded against U.S. net deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards, we do not recognize any incremental U.S. tax expense on the expected future repatriation of these foreign earnings. Should the U.S. valuation allowance be released at some future date, the U.S. tax on foreign earnings not considered to be permanently reinvested might have a material effect on our effective tax rate. For Fiscal 2013, we project approximately $3 million of additional tax expense from non-U.S. withholding and other taxes expected to be incurred on repatriation of current earnings.
As of September 30, 2013, we have U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,515 million and $1,551 million, respectively. These net operating loss carryforwards expire through years ending in 2033. We also have foreign loss carryforwards of approximately $111 million, which will expire beginning in 2014. Certain of the foreign net operating losses have indefinite carryforward periods. We have had multiple changes of ownership, as defined under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 382, that subject our U.S. federal and state net operating losses and other tax attributes to certain limitations. The annual limitation on our use of these carryforwards is based on a number of factors including the value of our stock (as defined for tax purposes) on the date of the ownership change, our net unrealized built in gain position on that date, the occurrence of realized built in gains in years subsequent to the ownership change, and the effects of subsequent ownership changes (as defined for tax purposes), if any. In addition, separate return year limitations apply to limit our utilization of the acquired Russell Hobbs U.S. federal and state net operating losses to future income of the Russell Hobbs subgroup. Based on these factors, we estimate that $301 million of the total U.S. federal and $358 million of the state net operating loss would expire unused even if the Company generates sufficient income to otherwise use all its NOLs. In addition, we project that $103 million of the total foreign net operating loss carryforwards will expire unused. We have provided a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets as well.
The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends on our ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions. We establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when we estimate it is more likely than not that the tax assets will not be realized. We base these estimates on projections of future income, including tax planning strategies, in certain jurisdictions. Changes in industry conditions and other economic conditions may impact our ability to project future income. Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 740: “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”) requires the establishment of a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In accordance with ASC 740, we periodically assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realized and determine if adjustments to the valuation allowance are required.
Our total valuation allowance for the tax benefit of deferred tax assets that may not be realized is approximately $455 million at September 30, 2013. Of this amount, approximately $422 million relates to U.S. net deferred tax assets and approximately $33 million relates to foreign net deferred tax assets. Our total valuation allowance was approximately $385 million at September 30, 2012. Of this amount, approximately $350 million related to U.S. net deferred tax assets and approximately $35 million related to foreign net deferred tax assets. As a result of the purchase of the HHI Business, we reversed $50 million of U.S. valuation allowance during Fiscal 2013. As a result of the purchase of FURminator, we released $15 million of U.S. valuation allowance during Fiscal 2012. These releases were attributable to the net deferred tax liabilities recorded on the opening balance sheets of the acquired companies in purchase accounting, which offset other U.S. net deferred tax assets.
ASC 740, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions, requires that we recognize in our financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not to be sustained on audit based on the technical merits of the position. As of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate in future periods was $14 million and $6 million, respectively. See Note 9, "Income Taxes", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2011
Highlights of Consolidated Operating Results
Net Sales. Net sales for Fiscal 2012 increased to $3,252 million from $3,187 million in Fiscal 2011, a 2% increase. The

42


following table details the principal components of the change in net sales from Fiscal 2011 to Fiscal 2012 (in millions):
 Net Sales
Fiscal 2011 Net Sales$3,187
Increase in pet supplies45
Increase in home and garden control products33
Increase in consumer batteries31
Increase in electric shaving and grooming products12
Increase in electric personal care products9
Increase in small appliances8
Foreign currency impact, net(73)
  
Fiscal 2012 Net Sales$3,252
  
Consolidated net sales by product line for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 are as follows (in millions):
  Fiscal Year
  2012 2011
Product line net sales    
Consumer batteries $949
 $954
Small appliances 772
 778
Pet supplies 615
 579
Home and garden control products 387
 354
Electric shaving and grooming products 279
 274
Electric personal care products 250
 248
Total net sales to external customers $3,252
 $3,187
Global consumer battery sales during Fiscal 2012 decreased $5 million compared to Fiscal 2011. Excluding negative foreign exchange impacts of $36 million, global consumer battery sales increased $31 million, or 3%. The growth of global consumer battery sales on a constant currency basis was driven by new customer listings as well as increased shelf space at existing customers, coupled with price increases, primarily in Latin America, and geographic expansion.
Small appliances sales decreased $6 million during Fiscal 2012 compared to Fiscal 2011. Excluding negative foreign exchange impacts of $14 million, small appliances sales increased $8 million, or 1%. Latin American and European constant currency sales increases of $16 million and $12 million, respectively, were tempered by a $19 million decrease in North American sales. Latin American sales gains resulted from distribution gains with existing customers as well as price increases. European sales increases were attributable to market share gains in the United Kingdom and expansion of the Russell Hobbs brand throughout Europe. Decreased North American sales were a result of a concerted effort to eliminate certain low margin promotions.
Pet supply product sales during Fiscal 2012 increased $36 million, or 6%, compared to Fiscal 2011, led by increases in companion animal and aquatics sales of $34 million and $11 million, respectively, tempered by $8 million in negative foreign currency impacts. Gains in companion animal sales were due to the FURminator acquisition, distributional gains and growth in the Nature's Miracle brand in the U.S. Aquatics sales gains resulted from increases in North American aquarium starter kits and pond related sales, including new distribution at major retailers, which were tempered by lower European aquatics sales.
Sales of home and garden control products during Fiscal 2012 versus Fiscal 2011 increased $33 million, or 9%, driven by increased household insect controls sales of $30 million resulting from the Black Flag acquisition and strong retail distribution gains with existing customers. Lawn and garden controls sales increased $3 million in Fiscal 2012 compared to Fiscal 2011 due to increased distribution with existing customers.
Electric shaving and grooming product sales during Fiscal 2012 increased $5 million, or 2%, compared to Fiscal 2011 led by a $14 million increase in European sales and a $4 million increase in Latin American sales. These gains were tempered by a $6 million decline in North American sales and negative foreign exchange impacts of $7 million. European sales gains were driven by successful promotions for new product launches, while the increase in Latin American sales was due to distribution and customer gains. North American declines resulted from the elimination of lower margin promotions as well as distribution

43


declines.
Electric personal care product sales in Fiscal 2012 increased $2 million compared to Fiscal 2011 driven by gains in North America and Latin America of $11 million and $7 million, respectively, which were tempered by a $8 million decline in European sales and negative foreign exchange impacts of $8 million. The gains in North America and Latin America were attributable to the continued success in new product categories and distribution gains in Latin America, whereas the decrease in European sales was a result of declining women's hair straightener sales due to a shift in fashion trends combined with decreased promotions in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for Fiscal 2012 was $1,116 million versus $1,129 million during Fiscal 2011, representing a $13 million decrease. Our gross profit margin for Fiscal 2012 decreased to 34.3% from 35.4% in Fiscal 2011. The decrease in gross profit and gross profit margin was driven by $36 million of negative foreign exchange impacts, a $17 million increase in commodity prices and higher costs for sourced goods, primarily from Asia, a $12 million increase in costs due to changes in product mix and a $2 million increase in Restructuring and related charges. These factors contributing to the decline in gross profit were tempered by increased organic sales which contributed $31 million of gross profit and Fiscal 2012 acquisitions which contributed $23 million of gross profit.
Operating Expense. Operating expenses for Fiscal 2012 totaled $814 million versus $901 million during Fiscal 2011. The $87 million decrease in operating expenses for Fiscal 2012 versus Fiscal 2011 was driven by synergies recognized subsequent to the Merger of $25 million, decreased asset impairment charges of $32 million, decreased Acquisition and integration charges of $6 million, positive foreign exchange impacts of $20 million and savings from our cost reduction initiatives. See Note 2, "Significant Accounting Policies—Acquisition and Integration Related Charges", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our Acquisition and integration charges.
Operating Income. Operating income was approximately $302 million in Fiscal 2012 compared to $228 million recognized in Fiscal 2011, representing an increase of $74 million. The increase is primarily attributable to the decreased operating expenses discussed above, which were slightly offset by the decline in gross profit as detailed above.
Adjusted EBITDA. Management believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures may be useful in certain instances to provide additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior operating periods. Adjusted EBITDA is a metric used by management and frequently used by the financial community. Adjusted EBITDA provides insight into an organization’s operating trends and facilitates comparisons between peer companies, since interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization can differ greatly between organizations as a result of differing capital structures and tax strategies. Adjusted EBITDA can also be a useful measure of a company’s ability to service debt and is one of the measurescash used for determining our debt covenant compliance. Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain items that are unusual in nature or not comparable from period to period. While management believes that non-GAAP measurements are useful supplemental information, such adjusted results are not intended to replace our GAAP financial results.
Adjusted EBITDA was $485 million for Fiscal 2012 compared with $457 million for Fiscal 2011.
Segment Results. As discussed under “Business Overview” above we manage our business in three reportable segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances, (ii) Global Pet Supplies; and (iii) Home and Garden Business.
Operating segment profits do not include restructuring and related charges, acquisition and integration related charges, interest expense, interest income, impairment charges, reorganization items and income tax expense. Expenses associated with global operations, consistingacquisitions, net of research and development, manufacturing management, global purchasing, quality operations and inbound supply chain are included in the determinationcash acquired, of operating segment profits. Expenses associated with certain general and administrative functions have been excluded in the determination of reportable segment profits and are included in corporate expenses. These corporate expenses primarily include general and administrative expenses and the costs of global long-term incentive compensation plans which are evaluated on a consolidated basis and not allocated to our operating segments.
All depreciation and amortization included in income from operations is related to operating segments or corporate expense. Costs are allocated to operating segments or corporate expense according to the function of each cost center. All capital expenditures are related to operating segments. Variable allocations of assets are not made for segment reporting.
Global strategic initiatives and financial objectives for each reportable segment are determined at the corporate level. Each reportable segment is responsible for implementing defined strategic initiatives and achieving certain financial objectives and has a general manager responsible for the sales and marketing initiatives and financial results for product lines within that segment. Financial information pertaining to our reportable segments is contained in Note 11, "Segment Information", of Notes

44


to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Below are reconciliations of GAAP Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations to Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA by segment and for Consolidated Spectrum Brands for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011:
  Fiscal 2012
  
Global
Batteries  &
Appliances
 
Global Pet
Supplies
 
Home and
Garden
Business
 
Corporate /
Unallocated
Items(a)
 
Consolidated
SB Holdings
  (in millions)
Net income (loss), as adjusted (a) $221
 $70
 $71
 $(313) $49
Income tax expense 
 
 
 60
 60
Interest expense 
 
 
 192
 192
Acquisition and integration related charges 15
 5
 2
 9
 31
Restructuring and related charges 7
 10
 1
 1
 19
Adjusted EBIT $243
 $85
 $74
 $(51) $351
Depreciation and amortization (d) 64
 28
 13
 29
 134
Adjusted EBITDA $307
 $113
 $87
 $(22) $485

  Fiscal 2011
  
Global
Batteries  &
Appliances
 
Global Pet
Supplies
 
Home and
Garden
Business
 
Corporate /
Unallocated
Items(a)
 
Consolidated
SB Holdings
  (in millions)
Net income (loss), as adjusted (a) $180
 $50
 $62
 $(367) $(75)
Income tax expense 
 
 
 92
 92
Interest expense 
 
 
 184
 184
Write-off unamortized discounts and financing fees (b) 
 
 
 24
 24
Restructuring and related charges 6
 17
 2
 4
 29
Acquisition and integration related charges 31
 
 
 6
 37
Intangible asset impairment 23
 8
 1
 
 32
Accelerated depreciation and amortization (c) (1) 
 
 
 (1)
Adjusted EBIT $239
 $75
 $65
 $(57) $322
Depreciation and amortization (d) 68
 24
 12
 31
 135
Adjusted EBITDA $307
 $99
 $77
 $(26) $457
(a)It is our policy to record income tax expense and interest expense on a consolidated basis. Accordingly, such amounts are not reflected in the operating results of the operating segments.
(b)Adjustment reflects the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees and discounts related to the refinancing of our Term loan facility.
(c)Adjustment reflects restricted stock amortization and accelerated depreciation associated with certain restructuring initiatives. Inasmuch as this amount is included within Restructuring and related charges, this adjustment negates the impact of reflecting the add-back of depreciation and amortization.
(d)Included within depreciation and amortization is amortization of unearned restricted stock compensation.
Global Batteries & Appliances

45


  2012 2011
  (in millions)
Net sales to external customers $2,250
 $2,254
Segment profit $244
 $239
Segment profit as a % of net sales 10.8% 10.6%
Segment Adjusted EBITDA $307
 $307
Assets as of September 30, $2,243
 $2,275
Segment net sales to external customers in Fiscal 2012 decreased $4 million to $2,250 million from $2,254$1,191.1 million during Fiscal 2011, driven by unfavorable foreign currency exchange translation which impacted Fiscal 2012 net sales by approximately $65 million. Excluding foreign exchange, segment sales increased by $61 million, led by increased consumer batteries sales of $31 million. The growth of global consumer battery sales on a constant currency basis was driven by new customer listings as well as increased shelf space at existing customers, coupled with price increases, primarily in Latin America, and geographic expansion. Excluding foreign exchange, electric shaving and grooming sales increased $12 million, driven by an increase of $14 million due to successful new product launches in Europe and $4 million of distribution gains with existing customers in Latin America, tempered by a $6 million decrease in North American sales. Electric personal care product sales increased $9 million, excluding foreign exchange impacts, led by North American and Latin American sales increases of $11 million and $7 million, respectively, resulting from successful new product introductions and distribution gains in Latin America. The gains in electric personal care product sales were tempered by an $8 million decrease in European sales driven by declining women's hair straightener sales which is attributed to a change in fashion trends combined with decreased promotions in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012. Excluding foreign exchange impacts, small appliances sales increased $8 million. Geographically, small appliance sales increased $16 million in Latin America and $12 million in Europe, tempered by a $19 million decrease in North American small appliance sales. Latin American sales gains were attributable to price increases, distribution gains with existing customers and new customer gains, whereas European sales increases resulted from market share gains in the United Kingdom and expansion of the Russell Hobbs brand throughout Europe. The decline in North American small appliances sales resulted from a concerted effort to eliminate certain low margin promotions.
Segment profitability during Fiscal 2012 increased $5 million to $244 million from $239 million in Fiscal 2011. Segment profitability as a percentage of net sales increased slightly to 10.8% in Fiscal 2012 compared to 10.6% in Fiscal 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to favorable changes in product mix, and synergies recognized following the Merger, tempered by decreased sales and increased commodity prices.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA in Fiscal 2012 remained flat at $307 million, due to favorable changes in product mix which were offset by decreased sales and increased commodity costs.
Segment assets atyear ended September 30, 2012 decreased to $2,243 million from $2,275 million at September 30, 2011 primarily resulting from the amortization of intangible assets. Goodwill and intangible assets,2015, which are directly a result of the revaluation impacts of fresh-start reporting and subsequent acquisitions, decreased to $1,261 million at September 30, 2012 from $1,295 million at September 30, 2011.
Global Pet Supplies
  2012 2011
  (in millions)
Net sales to external customers $616
 $579
Segment profit $86
 $75
Segment profit as a % of net sales 14.0% 13.0%
Segment Adjusted EBITDA $113
 $99
Assets as of September 30, $956
 $828
Segment sales to external customers in Fiscal 2012 increased to $615 million from $579 million in Fiscal 2011, representing an increase of $36 million or 6%, driven by increased companion animal sales and aquatics sales of $34 million and $11 million, respectively. Companion animal sales increases resulted from the FURminator acquisition in Fiscal 2012, which contributed $30 million in sales, and expansion of the Nature's Miracle brand in the U.S. Strong North American aquarium starter kits and pond related sales drove the increase in aquatics sales, which was tempered by lower European aquatics sales. Foreign exchange negatively impacted Fiscal 2012 pet supplies sales by $8 million.

46


Segment profitability increased $11 million in Fiscal 2012 to $86 million from $75 million in Fiscal 2011. Segment profitability as a percentage of sales in Fiscal 2012 also increased to 14.0% from 13.0% during Fiscal 2011. The increase in segment profit is attributable to increased sales and North American pricing improvements in Fiscal 2012, partially offset by negative foreign exchange impacts and a slowing European economy. The higher segment profit as a percentage of sales is primarily a result of the acquisition of FURminator which contributes a higher margin compared to other products within the segment, coupled with savings from our restructuring initiatives. See “Restructuring and Related Charges” below, as well as Note 14, "Restructuring and Related Charges", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our restructuring and related charges.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA in Fiscal 2012 increased $14 million, to $113 million, from $99 million in Fiscal 2011. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA is due to the factors driving increased segment profitability discussed above.
Segment assets as of September 30, 2012 increased to $956 million from $828 million at September 30, 2011. Goodwill and intangible assets, which are directly a result of the revaluation impacts of fresh-start reporting and subsequent acquisitions, increased to $715 million at September 30, 2012 from $595 million at September 30, 2011, driven by the goodwill and intangible assets added with the FURminator acquisition.
Home and Garden Business
  2012 2011
  (in millions)
Net sales to external customers $387
 $354
Segment profit $74
 $65
Segment profit as a % of net sales 19.1% 18.4%
Segment Adjusted EBITDA $87
 $77
Assets as of September 30, $508
 $476

Segment net sales to external customers increased $33 million, or 9%, during Fiscal 2012, to $387 million, compared to $354 million in Fiscal 2011. Household insect control sales increased $30 million in Fiscal 2012 resulting from the Black Flag acquisition, which contributed $24 million in additional sales, coupled with retail distribution gains. Lawn and garden controls sales increased $3 million in Fiscal 2012, compared to Fiscal 2011, driven by increased distribution with existing customers.
Segment profitability in Fiscal 2012 improved $9 million, to $74 million, from $65 million in Fiscal 2011, driven by increased sales in Fiscal 2012. Segment profitability as a percentage of sales increased to 19.1% in Fiscal 2012, from 18.4% in Fiscal 2011. This increase in segment profitability was due to the increased sales for the period, coupled with strong control over operating expenses which positively impacted segment profitability as a percentage of sales.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA was $87 million in Fiscal 2012, an increase of $10 million, compared to segment Adjusted EBITDA of $77 million in Fiscal 2011. The increase in segment Adjusted EBITDA is attributable to the same factors that led to the increase in segment profit discussed above.
Segment assets as of September 30, 2012 increased to $508 million from $476 million at September 30, 2011. Goodwill and intangible assets, which are directly a result of the revaluation impacts of fresh-start reporting and subsequent acquisitions, increased to $433 million at September 30, 2012 from $404 million at September 30, 2011, driven by the Black Flag acquisition.
Corporate Expense. Our corporate expense in Fiscal 2012 decreased to $52 million from $54 million in Fiscal 2011. This decrease is attributable to a $1 million decrease in stock based compensation expense during Fiscal 2012 compared to Fiscal 2011 coupled with savings from expense management. Corporate expense as a percentage of consolidated net sales for Fiscal 2012 was 1.6% compared to 1.7% during Fiscal 2011.
Acquisition and Integration Related Charges. Acquisition and integration related charges include, but are not limited to, transaction costs such as banking, legal and accounting professional fees directly related to acquisitions, termination and related costs for transitional and certain other employees, integration related professional fees and other post business combination related expenses associated with our acquisitions. See Note 2, "Significant Accounting Policies - Acquisition and Integration Related Charges" to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further detail regarding our Acquisition and integration related charges.


47


Restructuring and Related Charges. See Note 14, “Restructuring and Related Charges” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding our restructuring and related charges.
Goodwill and Intangibles Impairment. Accounting standards require companies to test goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more often if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have been incurred. In Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, we tested our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as required. As a result of this testing, no impairment was identified in Fiscal 2012 while we recorded a non-cash pretax impairment charge of $32 million in Fiscal 2011. The $32 million non-cash pretax impairment charge incurred in Fiscal 2011 reflects trade name intangible asset impairments of the following: $23 million related to the Global Batteries and Appliances segment; $8$898.4 million related to Global Pet Supplies; and $1 million related to the Home and Garden Business. See Note 2(j), "Significant Accounting Policies and Practices—Intangible Assets", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details on goodwill and intangibles impairment charges.

Interest Expense. Interest expense in Fiscal 2012 decreased to $192 million from $208 million in Fiscal 2011. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to lower expense from the replacement of our 12% Notes with our 6.75% Notes in Fiscal 2012, reduced principal and lower effective interest rates related to our Term Loan and lower expenses for interest rate swaps and other fees and expenses. The cost savings were tempered by higher expense from increased principal primarily related to our 9.5% Notes, and expenses related to the refinancing of our 12% Notes and the amendment of our ABL Revolving Credit Facility. See Note 6, “Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our outstanding debt.
Income Taxes. In Fiscal 2012, we recorded income tax expense of $60 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $109 million, and in Fiscal 2011, we recorded income tax expense of $92 million on a pretax loss from continuing operations of $17 million. Our effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was approximately 55% for Fiscal 2012. Our effective tax rate on our loss from continuing operations was approximately 539% for Fiscal 2011. There are four significant factors impacting our book income tax rate. First, we are profitable in the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate and therefore must provide foreign income taxes even while we have a book loss in the United States. Our book loss in the U.S. is the result of substantially all of our debt and restructuring costs being incurred in our U.S. entities. Second, since there is a valuation allowance against U.S. deferred tax assets, we are unable to record any financial statement benefit related to our U.S. domestic losses. This impact is further exacerbated by the tax amortization of certain domestic indefinite lived intangible assets. The deferred tax liabilities created by the tax amortization of these intangibles cannot be used to offset corresponding increases in net operating loss deferred tax assets in determining the Company's domestic valuation allowance. This results in additional net domestic tax expense despite the U.S. domestic book losses. Third, in Fiscal 2012, we recognized a $14 million tax benefit from the release of a portion of our U.S. valuation allowance, as discussed below, in connection with the purchase of FURminator. Finally, in Fiscal 2011, our consolidated pretax income was close to break even, which created a high effective tax rate as this rate is calculated by dividing tax expense into pretax income (loss).
As of September 30, 2012, we have U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,305 million and $1,341 million, respectively. These net operating loss carryforwards expire through years ending in 2032. We also have foreign loss carryforwards of approximately $119 million, which will expire beginning in 2016. Certain of the foreign net operating losses have indefinite carryforward periods. We have had multiple changes of ownership, as defined under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 382, that subject our U.S. federal and state net operating losses and other tax attributes to certain limitations. The annual limitation on our use of these carryforwards is based on a number of factors including the value of our stock (as defined for tax purposes) on the date of the ownership change, our net unrealized built in gain position on that date, the occurrence of realized built in gains in years subsequent to the ownership change, and the effects of subsequent ownership changes (as defined for tax purposes), if any. In addition, separate return year limitations apply to limit our utilization of the acquired Russell Hobbs U.S. federal and state net operating losses to future income of the Russell Hobbs subgroup. Based on these factors, we estimate that $301 million of the total U.S. federal and $385 million of the state net operating loss would expire unused even if the Company generates sufficient income to otherwise use all its NOLs. In addition, we project that $111 million of the total foreign net operating loss carryforwards will expire unused. We have provided a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets as well.
The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends on our ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions. We establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when we estimate it is more likely than not that the tax assets will not be realized. We base these estimates on projections of future income, including tax planning strategies, in certain jurisdictions. Changes in industry conditions and other economic conditions may impact our ability to project future income. Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 740: “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”) requires the establishment of a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In accordance with ASC 740, we periodically assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realized and determine if adjustments to the valuation allowance are required.

48


Our total valuation allowance for the tax benefit of deferred tax assets that may not be realized is approximately $385AAG acquisition; $147.8 million at September 30, 2012. Of this amount, approximately $350for the Salix acquisition; $115.7 million relates to U.S. net deferred tax assetsfor the European IAMS and approximately $35Eukanuba acquisition and $29.2 million relates to foreign net deferred tax assets. Our total valuation allowance was approximately $374 million at September 30, 2011. Of this amount, approximately $339 million related to U.S. net deferred tax assets and approximately $35 million related to foreign net deferred tax assets. As a result offor the purchase of FURminator, we were able to release $15 million of U.S. valuation allowance during Fiscal 2012. Tell acquisition.

The release was attributable to $15 million of net deferred tax liabilities recorded on the FURminator opening balance sheet that offset other U.S. net deferred tax assets. During Fiscal 2011, we also determined that a valuation allowance is required against deferred tax assets related to net operating losses in Brazil and thus recorded a $26 million charge.

ASC 740, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions, requires that we recognize in our financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not to be sustained on audit based on the technical merits of the position. As of September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate in future periods was $6 million and $9 million, respectively. See Note 9, "Income Taxes", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Activities. Cash provided by operating activities totaled $257 million during Fiscal 2013 compared to $259 million during Fiscal 2012. The $2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to:

Cash generated from higher adjusted EBITDA of $160 million, primarily due to the post-acquisition operating results of the HHI Business;
Offset by
A $104 million use of cash from working capital and other items driven by higher accounts receivable and changes in deferred income taxes, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable;
Higher cash payments for interest of $40 million, excluding payments related to the tender of our 9.5% Notes (See Note 6, "Debt", of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K);
Higher cash payments for income taxes of $11 million; and
Higher cash acquisition, integration and restructuring related costs of $7 million.
We expect to fund our cash requirements, including capital expenditures, interest and principal payments due in Fiscal 2014, through a combination of cash on hand, cash flow from operations and funds available for borrowings under our ABL Revolving Credit Facility. Going forward, our ability to satisfy financial and other covenants in our senior credit agreements and senior unsecured indenture and to make scheduled payments or prepayments on our debt and other financial obligations will depend on our future financial and operating performance. There can be no assurances that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowings under our ABL Revolving Credit Facility will be available in an amount sufficient to satisfy our debt maturities or to fund our other liquidity needs.
We are not treating Fiscal 2012 and future earnings as permanently reinvested. At September 30, 2013, there are no significant foreign cash balances available for repatriation. For Fiscal 2014, we expect to generate between $60 million and $90 million of foreign cash that will be repatriated for general corporate purposes.
See Item 1A. Risk Factors, for further discussion of the risks associated with our ability to service all of our existing indebtedness, our ability to maintain compliance with financial and other covenants related to our indebtedness and the impact of the current economic crisis.
Investing Activities. Net cash used by investing activities was $1,483 million for Fiscal 2013 compared to $231 million for Fiscal 2012. The $1,252$1,186.2 million increase in cash used by investing activities in Fiscal 2013 is driven by an increase induring the year ended September 30, 2015 was primarily attributable to the cash used for acquisitions of $1,191.1 million during the year ended September 30, 2015, discussed above, compared to the $27.6 million, net cash acquired, used for the Liquid Fence acquisition during the year ended September 30, 2014.

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

Net cash used by financing activities of $487.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 consist of (i) $485.0 million net proceeds from debt including $477.6 million from the 4.00% Notes and $7.4 million from other debt financing; (ii) $819.5 million of payments on debt, including partial redemption of $390.3 million of 6.375% Notes, payments on term loans of $415.5 million, $4.4 million payment on other debt financing and $9.3 million payments on capital leases; (iv) payment of debt issuance costs of $9.3 million; (v) cash dividends of $87.2 million; (vi) treasury stock purchases of $42.8 million (vii) payment of contingent consideration associated with previous acquisitions of $3.2 million; and (viii) a use of cash to pay share-based tax withholdings of employees for vested stock awards of $10.8 million, net of proceeds upon vesting.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $918.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 consist of (i) refinancing of the then-existing senior term facilities resulting in $2,036.5 million proceeds for the issuance of the new Term Loans and $1,589.6 million payment on the then-existing senior term facilities; (ii) $1,000.0 million proceeds from the issuance of the 5.75% Notes (iii) $540.0 million repayment of AAG debt assumed as part of the AAG acquisition (iv) $250.0 million proceeds from the issuance of the 6.125% Notes; (v) $300.0 million repayment of the 6.75% Notes; (vi) $363.6 million of payments on debt (vii) payment of debt issuance costs of $38.1 million; (vi) $562.7 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net issuance costs; (vii) cash dividends of $70.7 million; and (viii) treasury stock purchases of $21.2 million.

51$1,217 million, which


Net cash used by financing activities of $343.5 for the year ended September 30, 2014 consisted of (i) proceeds related to the $1,351issuance of debt under our former senior term facilities of $523.7 million; (ii) repayment of $764.9 million purchase, net under our former senior credit facilities and $6.0 million of other debt; (iii) dividend payments of $61.9 million; (iv) payment of share-based tax withholdings of employees for vested stock awards of $25.0 million; (v) treasury stock purchases of $4.5 million; and (vi)  payment of debt issuance costs of $5.4 million.  

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Net cash acquired, ofprovided by operating activities

The $159.8 million and $7.1 million increases in cash provided by operating activities from SB/RH for the HHI Business,year ended September 30, 2016 and the $49year ended September 30, 2015, respectively, are primarily attributable to the SBH factors discussed above.

Net cash used by investing activities

The $1,181.3 million purchase, net of cash acquired, of Shaser, versus the $139 million, net of cash acquired, purchase of FURminator decrease and the $44 million acquisition of Black Flag in Fiscal 2012. The remaining $35$1,186.2 million increase in cash used by investing activities was duefrom SB/RH for the year ended September 30, 2016 and the year ended September 30, 2015, respectively, are primarily attributable to an increase in capital expendituresthe SBH factors discussed above.

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

Net cash used by financing activities of $478.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2016 consist of (i) $498.9 million net proceeds from debt including $477.6 million from the addition4.00% Notes, $13.9 million from intercompany note with parent and $7.4 million from other debt financing; (ii) $868.1 million of payments on debt, including partial redemption of $390.3 million of 6.375% Notes, payments on term loans of $415.5 million, $48.6 million payment on intercompany note with parent, $4.4 million payment on other debt financing and $9.3 million payments on capital leases; (iv) payment of debt issuance costs of $9.3 million; (v) cash dividends to parent of $97.2 million; and (vi) payment on contingent consideration associated with previous acquisitions of $3.2 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $922.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 consist of (i) refinancing of the HHI Business.

then-existing senior term facilities resulting in $2,036.5 million of proceeds for the issuance of the new Term Loans and $1,589.6 million payment on the then existing senior term facilities; (ii) $1,000.0 million proceeds from the issuance of the 5.75% Notes (iii) $540.0 million repayment of AAG debt assumed as part of the AAG acquisition (iv) $250.0 million proceeds from the issuance of the 6.125% Notes; (v) $300.0 million repayment of the 6.75% Notes; (vi) $363.6 million of payments on debt; (vii) payment of debt issuance costs of $37.8 million; (vi) $528.3 million of proceeds from the parent, SBH; and (vii) cash dividends paid to SBH of $72.1 million.

Net cash used by financing activities of $338.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2014 consist of (i) proceeds related to the issuance of debt under our former senior term loans of $523.7 million; (ii) repayment of $764.9 million under the former senior credit facilities and $6.0 million of other debt; (iii) dividend payments to SBH of $77.0 million; (iv) payment of share-based tax withholdings of employees for vested stock awards of $25.0 million; and (v) payment of debt issuance costs of $5.4 million.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures for the Company totaled $95.2 million, $89.1 million and $73.3 million for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. We expect to make investments in capital projects similar to historical levels, as well as incremental investments slightly above historical levels related to acquisitions and in high return cost reduction projects slightly above historical levels.

projects.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization for the Company totaled $183.0 million, $170.0 million and $157.6 million for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. The increase in depreciation and amortization for the years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is due to the recognition of property, plant and equipment and definite lived intangible assets from the acquisitions of AAG, European IAMS and Eukanuba, and Salix during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, as previously discussed.

Financing Activities

49

52



Debt Financing
At September 30, 2013, we had the following debt instruments: (i) a senior secured term loan (the “Term Loan”) pursuant

Indebtedness

Refer to a senior credit agreement (the “Senior Credit Agreement”); (ii) 6.75% unsecured notes (the “6.75% Notes”); (iii) 6.375% unsecured notes (the “6.375% Notes”); (iv) 6.625% unsecured notes (the “6.625% Notes”); and (v) a $400 million asset based lending revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility,” and, together with the Term Loan, (the “Senior Credit Facilities”).

At September 30, 2013, the aggregate amountNote 10, “Debt” of principal outstanding under our debt instruments was as follows: (i) $1,745 million under the Term Loan, with $850 million maturing September 4, 2017, $300 million maturing September 4, 2019 and $595 million maturing December 17, 2019; (ii) $520 million under the 6.375% Notes maturing November 15, 2020; (ii) $570 million under the 6.625% Notes, maturing November 15, 2022; (iii) $300 million under the 6.75% Notes, maturing March 15, 2020; and (iv) $0 million under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility, expiring May 3, 2016.
At September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Senior Credit Agreement, the indenture governing both the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes, the indenture governing the 6.75% Notes and the credit agreement governing the ABL Revolving Credit Facility (the "ABL Credit Agreement").
From time to time we may repurchase our existing indebtedness, including outstanding securities of Spectrum Brands or its subsidiaries, in the open market or otherwise.
See Note 6, “Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our outstanding debt.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $1,280 million for Fiscal 2013 compared to net cash used of $11 million for Fiscal 2012.
The Fiscal 2013 cash proceeds consisted of the following: (i) proceeds related to the issuance $1,936 of Term Debt; (ii) proceeds related to issuance of $570 million of 6.625% Notes and $520 million of 6.375% Notes; (iii) a use of $1,061 million to extinguish $950 million of our 9.5% Notes, which included tender and call premium of $111 million; (iv) a use of $571 million to repay debt under the Senior Credit Facilities; (v) a use to pay $61 million of debt issuance costs; (vi) a use to pay $40 million of dividends; (vii) a use to pay share-based tax withholdings of employees for vested stock awards of $20 million; (viii) a use of $3 million for treasury stock purchases; and (ix) $11 million proceeds from other financing activities. The primary use of the proceeds was to fund the acquisitions discussed within “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Investing Activities.”
The Fiscal 2012 cash use consisted of the following: (i) proceeds related to issuance of $300 million of 6.75% Notes; (ii) proceeds related to an addition issuance of $200 million of 9.5% Notes and a premium related to the issuance of $17 million; (iii) a use of $270 million to extinguish $231 million of our 9.5% Notes, which included tender and call premium of $39 million; (iv) a use of $155 million to repay debt under the Senior Credit Facilities; (v) a use to pay $11 million of debt issuance costs; (vi) a use to pay $51 million of dividends; (vii) a use to pay share-based tax withholdings of employees for vested stock awards of $4 million; (viii) a use of $31 million for treasury stock purchases; (ix) and a $5 million use from other financing activities.
Interest Payments and Fees
information.

In addition to the outstanding principal payments on our debt obligations, mentioned above, we have annual interest payment obligations of approximately $155$170.1 million in the aggregate. This includes interest under our 6.375%our: (i) 4.00% Notes of approximately $19.1 million; (ii) 6.625% $33Notes of approximately $37.8 million, interest under our 6.625% (iii) 6.125% Notes of approximately $38 million and interest under our 6.75%$15.3 million; (iv) 5.75% Notes of approximately $20$57.5 million and based on principal amounts currently outstanding under these facilities, and using market interest rates and foreign exchange rates in effect at September 30, 2013, this also includes interest under our(iv) Term Loans and ABL Facility of approximately $64 million. Interest on our debt is payable in cash.$40.4 million. Interest on the 6.375%4.00% Notes, the 6.625% Notes and the 6.75% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears and interest under the Term Loan and the ABLRevolver Facility is payable on various interest payment dates as provided in the Senior Credit Agreement and the ABL Credit Agreement. We are required to pay certain fees in connection with our outstanding debt obligations. Such fees includeobligations including a quarterly commitment fee of up to 0.375%0.50% on the unused portion of the ABLRevolver Facility and certain additional fees with respect to the letter of credit sub-facility under the ABLRevolver Facility.

At September 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Senior Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our senior notes. See “Risk Factors”, for further discussion of the risks associated with our ability to service all of our existing indebtedness and maintain compliance with financial and other covenants related to such indebtedness.

Credit Ratings

The Company’s access to the capital markets and financing costs in those markets may depend on the credit ratings of the Company when it is accessing the capital markets. None of the Company’s current borrowings are subject to default or acceleration as a result of a downgrading of credit ratings, although a downgrade of the Company’s credit ratings could increase fees and interest charges on future borrowings.

Equity Financing Activities

During Fiscal 2013, wethe years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, SBH granted approximately 700 thousand shares of0.6 million, 0.6 million and 0.7 million restricted stock units (“RSUs”), respectively, to our employees and our directors. All vesting dates are subject to the recipient’s continued employment, with us, except as otherwise permitted by our Compensation Committee or Board of Directors or in certain cases if the employee is terminated without cause.cause or as otherwise provided in an applicable employment agreement. The total market value of the restricted


50


sharesRSUs on the date of grant was approximately $32for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $56.0 million,, $52.9 million, and $50.5 million, respectively, which represented unearned restricted stockshare based compensation. Such unearned compensation is amortized to expense over the appropriate vesting period.
See Note 16, “Share Based Compensation” of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information.

During the year ended September 30, 2015, SBH issued 6.2 million shares of common stock in connection with the AAG acquisition, resulting in $562.7 million in proceeds, net of equity issuance costs.

From time to time we may repurchase our outstanding shares of Common StockSBH common stock in the open market or otherwise.

On July 28, 2015, the Board of Directors approved a $300.0 million common stock repurchase program. The authorization is effective for 36 months. During the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, SBH repurchased 450,087, 230,000 and 71,752 shares, respectively.

Liquidity Outlook

The Company’s ability to make principal and interest payments on borrowings under its U.S. and foreign credit facilities and its ability to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on its ability to generate cash in the future, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory and other conditions. Based on its current level of operations, the Company believes that its existing cash balances and expected cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet its operating requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, the Company may request borrowings under its credit facilities and seek alternative forms of financing or additional investments to achieve its longer-term strategic plans.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

53


Contractual Obligations & Other Commercial Commitments

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 20132016 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in millions):periods:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Contractual Payments Due by Period

(in millions)

 

 

Total

 

 

Less than 1 year

 

 

1 to 3 years

 

 

3 to 5 years

 

 

Thereafter

Debt, excluding capital lease obligations(1)

 

$

3,566.9 

 

$

154.0 

 

$

26.7 

 

$

22.7 

 

$

3,363.5 

Interest payments excluding capital lease obligations(2)

 

 

1,286.4 

 

 

175.3 

 

 

339.4 

 

 

337.3 

 

 

434.4 

Capital lease obligations(3)

 

 

162.7 

 

 

16.4 

 

 

29.4 

 

 

27.7 

 

 

89.2 

Operating lease obligations(4)

 

 

147.1 

 

 

42.3 

 

 

56.1 

 

 

30.3 

 

 

18.4 

Employee benefit obligations(5)

 

 

112.3 

 

 

9.1 

 

 

19.9 

 

 

22.1 

 

 

61.2 

Total Contractual Obligations(6)

 

$

5,275.4 

 

$

397.1 

 

$

471.5 

 

$

440.1 

 

$

3,966.7 

  Contractual Obligations
  Payments due by Fiscal Year
  2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total
Debt, excluding capital lease obligations $99
 $74
 $73
 $668
 $9
 $2,240
 $3,163
Interest payments excluding capital lease obligations 160
 155
 153
 151
 127
 317
 1,063
Capital lease obligations(1) 8
 9
 8
 7
 6
 71
 109
Operating lease obligations 40
 33
 28
 23
 15
 34
 173
Employee benefit obligations(2) 9
 9
 10
 10
 11
 63
 112
Total Contractual Obligations(3) $316
 $280
 $272
 $859
 $168
 $2,725
 $4,620

(1)

See Note 10 “Debt”, included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

(1)

(2)

Interest payments on debt subject to variable interest rates are based upon annualized interest rates as of September 30, 2016. See Note 10, “Debt”, included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

(3)

Capital lease payments due by fiscal year include executory costs and imputed interest not reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Financial PositionPosition. See Note 10 “Debt”, included elsewhere in thisthe Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

(4)

Operating lease payments due by fiscal year not reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. See Note 11 “Leases”, included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

(2)

(5)

Employee benefit obligations represent the sum of our estimated future minimum required funding for our qualified defined benefit plans based on actuarially determined estimates and projected future benefit payments from our unfunded postretirement plans. For additional information about our employee benefit obligations, seeSee Note 10, "Employee13 “Employee Benefit Plans"Plans”, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

(3)

(6)

At September 30, 2013,2016, our consolidated balance sheetConsolidated Statements of Financial Position includes tax reserves for uncertain tax positions. However, it is not possible to predict or estimate the timing of payments for these obligations. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of income tax audits currently in progress for certain of our companies; however, it is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months, some portion of our unrecognized tax benefits could be recognized. See Note 14 “Income Taxes”, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Other Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our other commercial commitments as of September 30, 2013,2016, consisting entirely of standby letters of credit that back the performance of certain of our entities under various credit facilities, insurance policies and lease arrangements (in millions):arrangements:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Contractual Payments Due by Period

(in millions)

 

 

Total

 

 

Less than 1 year

 

 

1 to 3 years

 

 

3 to 5 years

 

 

Thereafter

Letters of credit

 

$

24.6 

 

$

24.6 

 

$

 

$

 

$

  Other Commercial Commitments
  Amount of Commitment Expiration by Fiscal Year
  2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total
Letters of credit $32
 $5
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $37
Total Other Commercial Commitments $32
 $5
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $37

Critical Accounting Policies

and Estimates

Our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and fairly present our financial position and results of operations. We believeThe preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its accounting estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis. The following accounting policies are considered by management to be the most critical to an understanding the judgments that are involved in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.statements and the uncertainties that could impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The application of these accounting policies requires management’s


judgment and use of assumptions as to future events and outcomes that are uncertain and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. Refer to Note 2 “Significant Accounting Policies and Practices” of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for all relevant accounting policies.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

The Company’s goodwill, intangible assets and tangible fixed assets are stated at historical cost, net of depreciation and amortization, less any provision for impairment. Intangible and tangible assets with determinable lives are amortized or depreciated on a straight line basis over estimated useful lives. Refer to Note  2 “Significant Accounting Policies and Practices” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about useful lives.

51

54



judgment

On an annual basis, or more frequently if triggering events occur, the Company compares the estimated fair value of its reporting units to the carrying value to determine if potential goodwill impairment exists. Our reporting units are consistent with our operating segments. See Note 19, “Segment Information” for further discussion of operating and reporting segments. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded for the difference between the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill and its carrying value. The estimated fair value represents the amount at which a reporting unit could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties on an arms-length basis. In estimating the fair value of the reporting unit, we used a discounted cash flows methodology, which requires us to estimate future revenues, expenses, and capital expenditures and make assumptions about our weighted average cost of capital and perpetuity growth rate, among other variables. We test the aggregate estimated fair value of our reporting units by comparison to our total market capitalization, including both equity and debt capital. The fair value of GBA, HHI, PET, H&G, and GAC reporting units exceeded their carrying value by 157%, 110%, 58%, 326%, and 12%, respectively.

In addition to goodwill, the Company has indefinite-lived intangible assets that consist of acquired tradenames. On an annual basis, or more frequently if triggering events occur, the Company compares the estimated fair value of the identified trade names to the carrying value to determine if potential impairment exists. If the fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded for the excess. The fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets is determined using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty methodology, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future revenues, royalty rates, and the discount rate, among others. During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized $4.7 million impairment on indefinite life intangible assets due to the reduction in areas that are inherently uncertain.

Valuationvalue of Assets and Asset Impairment
We evaluate certain long-lived assetstradenames in response to be held and used, such as property, plant and equipment andchanges in management’s strategy.

The Company also reviews other definite-lived intangible assets and tangible fixed assets for impairment based onwhen events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the expected future cash flows or earnings projections associated with such assets. Impairment reviews are conducted atcarrying amount of the judgment of management when it believes that a change in circumstances in the business or external factors warrants a review.assets may not be fully recoverable. Circumstances such as the discontinuation of a product or product line, a sudden or consistent decline in the sales forecast for a product, changes in technology or in the way an asset is being used, a history of operating or cash flow losses or an adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, among others, may trigger an impairment review. An asset’sIf such indicators are present, the Company performs undiscounted cash flow analyses to determine if impairment exists. The asset value iswould be deemed impaired if the discountedundiscounted cash flows or earnings projectionsexpected to be generated doby the asset did not supportexceed the carrying value of the asset. The estimation of such amounts requires management’s judgment with respectIf impairment is determined to revenue and expense growth rates, changes in working capital and selection of an appropriate discount rate, as applicable. The use of different assumptions would increase or decrease discounted future operating cash flows or earnings projections and could, therefore, changeexist, any related impairment determinations.

ASC 350 requires companies to test goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more often if an event or circumstance indicatesloss is calculated based on fair value. There were no triggering events identified during the year that necessitated an impairment loss may have been incurred. In Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012test of definite-lived assets.

A considerable amount of judgment and Fiscal 2011, we tested our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as required. As a result of this testing, we recorded noassumptions is required in performing the impairment charges in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, and non-cash pretax impairment charges of approximately $32 million in Fiscal 2011. The $32 million impairment charge incurred in Fiscal 2011 reflects an impairment of trade name intangible assets consisting of the following: (i) $23 million related to Global Batteries and Appliances; (ii) $8 million related to Global Pet Supplies; and (iii) $1 million related to the Home and Garden Business.

We used a discounted estimated future cash flows methodology, third party valuations and negotiated sales prices to determine the fair value of our reporting units (goodwill). Fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, which represent trade names, was determined using a relief from royalty methodology. Assumptions critical to our fair value estimates were: (i) the present value factors usedtests, principally in determining the fair value of the reporting units and trade names or third party indicated fair values for assets expected to be disposed; (ii) royalty rates used in our trade name valuations; (iii) projected average revenue growth rates used in theeach reporting unit and trade name models;assets subject to impairment testing. While the Company believes its judgments and (iv) projected long-term growth rates used inassumptions are reasonable, different assumptions could change the derivation of terminal year values. We also tested the aggregate estimated fair value of our reporting units for reasonableness by comparisonand therefore, additional impairment changes could be required. The Company is subject to our total market capitalization, which includes both our equity and debt securities. These and other assumptions are impacted byfinancial statement risk in the event that business or economic conditions unexpectedly decline and expectations of management and will change inimpairment is realized.

Pensions

The Company recognizes amounts on the future based on period specific facts and circumstances.

The fair values of our Global Batteries & Appliances, Hardware & Home Improvement, Global Pet Supplies and Home and Garden Business reporting units, which are also our segments, exceeded their carry values by 74%, 17%, 83% and 80%, respectively, as of the date of our latest annual impairment testing.
See Note 2(i), "Significant Accounting Policies and Practices—Property, Plant and Equipment", Note 2(j), "Significant Accounting Policies and Practices—Intangible Assets"; Note 4, "Property, Plant and Equipment"; and Note 5, "Goodwill and Intangible Assets," of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about these assets.
Revenue Recognition and Concentration of Credit Risk
We recognize revenue from product sales generally upon delivery to the customer or the shipping point in situations where the customer picks up the product or where delivery terms so stipulate. This represents the point at which title and all risks and rewards of ownership of the product are passed, provided that: there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is deemed reasonably assured. We are generally not obligated to allow for, and our general policy is not to accept, product returns for battery sales. We do accept returns in specific instancesconsolidated financial statements related to our hardware and home improvement, electric shaving and grooming, electric personal care, home and garden, small appliances and pet supply products.defined benefit pension plans using a September 30 measurement date. The provisionaccounting for customer returns is based on historical sales and returns and other relevant information. We estimate and accrue the cost of returns, which are treated as a reduction of net sales.

We enter into various promotional arrangements, primarily with retail customers, including arrangements entitling such retailers to cash rebates from us based on the level of their purchases, which requirethese plans requires us to estimate and accruerecognize the costsoverfunded and/or underfunded status of the promotional programs. These costs are generally treated as a reduction of net sales.
We also enter into promotional arrangements that target the ultimate consumer. Such arrangements are treated as either a

52


reduction in net sales or an increase in cost of sales, based on the type of promotional program. The income statement presentation of our promotional arrangements complies with ASC Topic 605: “Revenue Recognition.” Cash consideration, or an equivalent thereto, given to a customer is generally classified as a reduction of net sales. If we provide a customer anything other than cash, the cost of the consideration is classified as an expense and included in cost of sales.
For all types of promotional arrangements and programs, we monitor our commitments and use statistical measures and past experience to determine the amounts to be recorded for the estimate of the earned, but unpaid, promotional costs. The terms of our customer-related promotional arrangements and programs are tailored to each customer and are generally documented through written contracts, correspondence or other communications with the individual customers.
We also enter into various arrangements, primarily with retail customers, which require us to make an upfront cash, or “slotting” payment, to secure the right to distribute through such customer. We capitalize slotting payments, provided the payments are supported by a time or volume based arrangement with the retailer, and amortize the associated payment over the appropriate time or volume based term of the arrangement. The amortization of slotting payments is treated as a reduction in net sales and a corresponding asset is reported in Deferred charges and other in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our trade receivables subject us to credit risk which is evaluated based on changing economic, political and specific customer conditions. We assess these risks and make provisions for collectibility based on our best estimate of the risks presented and information available at the date of the financial statements. The use of different assumptions may change our estimate of collectibility. We extend credit to our customers based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and credit history and generally do not require collateral. Our credit terms generally range between 30 and 90 days from invoice date, depending upon the evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and history. We monitor our customers’ credit and financial condition in order to assess whether the economic conditions have changed and adjust our credit policies with respect to any individual customer as we determine appropriate. These adjustments may include, but are not limited to, restricting shipments to customers, reducing credit limits, shortening credit terms, requiring cash payments in advance of shipment or securing credit insurance.
See Note 2(c), "Significant Accounting Policies and Practices—Revenue Recognition"; Note 2(d), "Significant Accounting Policies and Practices—Use of Estimates" and Note 2(f), "Significant Accounting Policies and Practices—Concentrations of Credit Risk and Major Customers and Employees"; of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about our revenue recognition and credit policies.
Pensions
Our accounting for pension benefits is primarily based on a discount rate, expected and actual return on plan assets and other assumptions made by management, and is impacted by outside factors such as equity and fixed income market performance. Our pension liability is principally(i.e. the estimated present value of future benefits, net of plan assets. In calculatingassets) on the consolidated statement of financial position. A substantial portion of our pension obligations are related to defined benefit pension plans in the U.S., a majority of which are frozen. The determination of the estimated present value of future benefits netincludes several important assumptions, particularly around discount rates, expected returns on plan assets, and retirement and mortality rates.

The Company’s discount rate assumptions are based on the interest rate of plan assets,high-quality corporate bonds, with appropriate consideration of our plans’ participants’ demographics and benefit payment terms. For the year ended September 30, 2016, we used discount rates of 1.8%ranging from 1.00% to 13.0% in Fiscal 2013 and of 4.0% to 13.5% in Fiscal 201213.50%. In adjusting the discount rates from Fiscal 2012 to Fiscal 2013, we considered the change in the general market interest rates of debt and solicited the advice of our actuary. We believe the discount rates used are reflective of the rates at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled.

Pension expense is principally the sum of interest and service cost of the plan, less the expected return on plan assets and the amortization of the difference between our assumptions and actual experience. The expected return on plan assets is calculated by applying an assumed rate of return to the fair value of plan assets. We used expected returns on plan assets of 3.6% to 7.8% in Fiscal 2013 and 4.0% to 7.8% in Fiscal 2012. Based on the advice of our independent actuary, we believe the expected rates of return are reflective of the long-term average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested. If such expected returns were overstated, it would ultimately increase future pension expense and required funding contributions. Similarly, an understatement of the expected return would ultimately decrease future pension expense and required funding contributions. If plan assets decline due to poor performance by the markets and/or interest rates decline resulting in a lower discount rate, our pension liability, will increase ultimately increasingalong with the related pension expense and required funding contributions.  

The Company’s expected return on plan assets assumptions are based on our expectation of long-term average rates of return on assets in the pension funds, which reflect both the current and projected asset mix of the funds and consider the historical returns earned on the fund. If the actual rates of return are lower than we assume, our future pension expense and required funding contributions may increase. Actual returns above the assumed level could decrease future pension expense and lower the amount of required funding contributions. For the year ended September 30, 2016, we used an expected return on plan assets of 7.00%. If plan assets decline due to poor market performance, our pension liability will increase along with increasing pension expense and required funding contributions may increase.

55


The Company reviews its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and makes modifications based on current rates and trends when appropriate. Based on the information provided by independent actuaries and other relevant sources, the Company believes that the assumptions used are reasonable; however, changes in these assumptions could impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows in the future. See Note 10, "Employee13,  “Employee Benefit Plans," of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more completefurther discussion of our employee benefit plans.

Restructuring and Related Charges

Restructuring charges are recognized and measured according to the provisions of ASC Topic 420: “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations,” (“ASC 420”). Under ASC 420, restructuring charges include, but are not limited to, termination and related costs consisting primarily of one-time termination benefits such as severance costs and retention bonuses, and contract termination costs consisting primarily of lease


53


termination costs. Related charges, as defined by us, include, but are not limited to, other costs directly associated with exit and integrationrelocation activities, including impairment of property and other assets, departmental costs of full-time incremental integration employees, and any other items related to the exit or integrationrelocation activities. Costs for such activities are estimated by us after evaluating detailed analyses of the costcosts to be incurred. We present restructuring and related charges on a combined basis.

Liabilities from restructuring and related charges are recorded for estimated costs of facility closures, significant organizational adjustments and measures undertaken by managementus to exit certain activities. Costs for such activities are estimated by managementus after evaluating detailed analyses of the costs to be incurred. Such liabilities could include amounts for items such as severance costs and related benefits (including settlements of pension plans), impairment of property and equipment and other current or long term assets, lease termination payments and any other items directly related to the exit activities. While the actions are carried out as expeditiously as possible, restructuring and related charges are estimates. Changes in estimates resulting in an increase to or a reversal of a previously recorded liability may be required as management executes a restructuring plan.

We report restructuring

Restructuring and related charges associated with manufacturing and related initiatives are reported in cost of goods sold. Restructuring and related charges reflected in cost of goods sold include, but are not limited to, termination and related costs associated with manufacturing employees, asset impairments relating to manufacturing initiatives and other costs directly related to the restructuring initiatives implemented.

We report restructuring Restructuring and related charges associated with administrative functions are reported in operating expenses, such as initiatives impacting sales, marketing, distribution or other non-manufacturing related functions. Restructuring and related charges reflected in operating expenses include, but are not limited to, termination and related costs, any asset impairments relating to the administrative functions and other costs directly related to the initiatives implemented.

While the actions are carried out as expeditiously as possible, restructuring and related charges are estimates. Changes in estimates resulting in an increase to or a reversal of a previously recorded liability may be required as we execute a restructuring plan. See Note 14, "Restructuring4, “Restructuring and Related Charges,"Charges” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of our restructuring initiatives and related costs.

Acquisition

Income Taxes

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and Integration Related Charges

numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and recording the related deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The costsCompany assesses its income tax positions and records tax liabilities for all years subject to examination based upon management’s evaluation of plans to (i) exit an activitythe facts and circumstances and information available for reporting. For those income tax positions where it is not more-likely-than-not that a tax benefit will not be sustained upon conclusion of an acquired company, (ii) involuntarily terminate employeesexamination, the Company has recorded a reserve based upon the largest amount of an acquired company or (iii) relocate employeestax benefit having a cumulatively greater than 50% likelihood of an acquired company are measured and recorded in accordancebeing realized upon ultimate settlement with the provisionsapplicable taxing authority assuming that it has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions where it is more-likely-than-not that a tax benefit will be sustained, the ASC 805. Under ASC 805,Company did not recognize a reserve. As of September 30, 2016, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, that if certain conditions are met, such costs arenot recognized, as a liability assumed as ofwould affect the consummation date of the purchase business combination and includedeffective tax rate in the allocation of the acquisition cost. Costs related to terminated activities or employees of the acquired company that do not meet the conditions prescribed in ASC 805 are treated as acquisition and integration related charges and expensed as incurred.

See Note 2(x), "Significant Accounting Policies and Practices - Acquisition and Integration Related Charges" of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K .
Accounting for Acquisitions
Accounting for acquisitions requires us to recognize and measure identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity. Our accounting for acquisitions involves significant judgments and estimates, including the fair value of certain forms of consideration, the fair value of acquired intangible assets, which involve projections of future revenues, cash flows and terminal value, which are then either discounted at an estimated discount rate or measured at an estimated royalty rate, and the fair value of other acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including potential contingencies, and the useful lives of the assets. The projections are developed using internal forecasts, available industry and market data and estimates of long-term rates of growth for our business. The impact of prior or future acquisitions on our financial position or results of operations may be materially impacted by the change in or initial selection of assumptions and estimates. 
See Note 15, "Acquisitions" of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of ASC 805 purchase accounting valuation assumptions.
Deferred Income Tax Asset and Other Tax Reserves
We assess our deferred tax asset and record a valuation allowance, when necessary, to reduce our deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered future taxable income, taxable temporary differences and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. Should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period we made that determination.


54


We establish reserves when, despite our belief that our tax returns are fully supportable, we believe that certain positions may be challenged and ultimately modified. We adjust the reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances.periods was $50.6 million. Our effective tax rate includes the impact of income tax related reserve positionsreserves and changes to income taxthose reserves that we considerwhen considered appropriate. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have established a reserve is finally resolved. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue may require the use of cash or a reduction in our net operating loss carryforwards. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to the effective rate in the year of resolution. Tax reserves

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, net operating losses, tax credit, and other carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are presentedmeasured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance based on historical losses, projected future taxable income, expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences, and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. We base these estimates on projections of future income, including tax planning strategies, in certain jurisdictions. Changes in industry conditions and other economic conditions may impact our ability to project future income. Should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period we make that determination.

56


As of September 30, 2016, we have U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of $758.9 million, with a federal tax benefit of $265.6 million and future tax benefits related to state NOLs of $60.6 million and capital loss carryforwards of $19.8 million with a federal and state tax benefit of $7.6 million. Our total valuation allowance for the tax benefit of deferred tax assets that may not be realized is $245.7 million at September 30, 2016. Of this amount, $203.7 million relates to U.S. net deferred tax assets and $42.0 million relates to foreign net deferred tax assets. We estimate that $197.8 million of valuation allowance related to domestic deferred tax assets cannot be released regardless of the amount of domestic operating income generated due to both prior period ownership changes that limit the amount of NOLs we can use and legal limitations on the balance sheetuse of capital losses and foreign tax credits.

As of September 30, 2016, we have provided $32.8 million of residual US taxes on earnings not yet taxed in the U.S. As of September 30, 2016, we project $3.4 million of additional tax expense from non-U.S. withholding and other liabilities.  

taxes expected to be incurred on repatriation of foreign earnings.

See Note 9, "Income Taxes" 14, “Income Taxes” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Loss Contingencies
Loss contingencies are recorded as liabilities when it is probableReport.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU requires revenue recognition to depict the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new revenue recognition model requires identifying the contract and performance obligations, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to performance obligations and recognizing the revenue upon satisfaction of performance obligations. This ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a loss has been incurred andcontract. This ASU can be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the amountcumulative effect of initially applying the updates recognized at the date of the lossinitial application along with additional disclosures. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Deferral of the Effective Date, which amends the previously issued ASU to provide for a one year deferral from the original effective date. As a result, the ASU will become effective for us beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, with early application only being available to us beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2018. We are assessing the impact this pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and have not determined the materiality or method of adoption.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes the lease requirements in ASC 840, Leases. This ASU requires lessees to recognize lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet, as well as to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Although the new ASU requires both operating and finance leases to be disclosed on the balance sheet, a distinction between the two types still exists as the economics of leases can vary. The ASU can be reasonably estimated. The outcomeapplied using a modified retrospective approach, with a number of existing litigation,optional practical expedients relating to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before the effective date, along with the ability to use hindsight in the evaluation of lease decisions, that entities may elect to apply. As a result, the ASU will become effective for us beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, with early adoption applicable. We are assessing the impact this pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements of environmental mattersthe Company and pendinghave not determined the materiality or potential examinations by various taxing authorities are examplesmethod of situations evaluated as loss contingencies. Estimating the probability and magnitudeadoption.

57


See further discussion in Item 3, Legal Proceedings, and Note 12, "Commitments and Contingencies," of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Significant Accounting Policies
Other significant accounting policies, primarily those with lower levels of uncertainty than those discussed above, are also critical to understanding the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain additional information related to our accounting policies, including recent accounting pronouncements, and should be read in conjunction with this discussion.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk Factors

We have market risk exposure from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We, whenWhen appropriate, we use derivative financial instruments to mitigate the risk from such exposures.

A  discussion of our accounting policies for derivative financial instruments is included in Note 7, "Derivative Financial Instruments",12, “Derivatives,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
InterestReport.

Interest Rate Risk

A substantial portion of our debt bears interest at variable rates. If market interest rates increase, the interest rate on our variable rate debt will increase and will create higher debt service requirements, which would adversely affect our cash flow and could adversely impact our results of operations. We also have bank lines of credit at variable interest rates. The general levellevels of U.S., Canadian and CanadianEuropean Union interest rates, LIBOR, CDOR and Euro LIBOREURIBOR affect interest expense. We periodically use interest rate swaps to manage such risk. The net amounts to be paid or received under interest rate swap agreements are accrued as interest rates change, and are recognized over the life of the swap agreements as an adjustment to interest expense from the underlying debt to which the swap is designated. The related amounts payable to, or receivable from, the contract counter-partiescounterparties are included in accrued liabilities or accounts receivable.

At September 30, 2013, there were no2016 we had $1,140.3 million or 31% of our total debt subject to variable interest rates, the majority related to our term loan of $1,123.4 million subject to a 0.75% floor. After inclusion of a weighted average of $155.3 million of interest rate swaps expiring in April 2017 fixing a portion of the variable rate debt, $985.0 million or 27% of our debt is subject to variable rates. Assuming an increase to market rates of 1% as of September 30, 2016, we would incur an increase to interest expense of $9.4 million.

At September 30, 2016, the potential change in fair value of our outstanding interest rate derivative instruments.

instruments assuming a 1 percent decline in interest rates would be a loss of $0.2 million. The net impact on reported earnings, after also including the effect of the change on one year’s underlying interest rate exposure on our variable rate Term Loan, would be a net loss of $0.2 million.

Foreign Exchange Risk

We are subject to risk from sales and loans to and from our subsidiaries as well as sales to, purchases from and bank lines of credit with third-party customers, suppliers and creditors denominated in foreign currencies. Foreign currency sales and purchases are made primarily in Euro, Pounds Sterling, Mexican Pesos, Canadian Dollars, Australian Dollars and Brazilian Reals. We manage our foreign exchange exposure from anticipatedsuch sales, accounts receivable, intercompany loans, firm purchase commitments, accounts payable and credit obligations through the use of naturally occurring offsetting positions (borrowing in local currency), forward foreign exchange contracts, foreign exchange rate swaps and foreign exchange options. The related amounts payable to, or receivable from, the contract counter-parties are included in accounts payable or accounts


55


receivable.

debt denominated in foreign currencies. Other than our Euro-denominated term loan, Canadian-denominated term loan and Euro-denominated 4.00% Notes in the equivalent of $594.9 million recorded in a U.S. Dollar functional entity, the remaining debt is recorded in countries with the same functional currency as the debt. The foreign currency exposure from the Euro-denominated and Canadian-denominated term loans are substantially offset by Euro-denominated and Canadian-denominated intercompany loan receivables recorded in a U.S. Dollar-function entity and the 4.00% Notes are held as a net investment hedge of the translation of the Company’s net investments in Euro-denominated subsidiaries.

At September 30, 2016, the potential change in fair value of outstanding foreign exchange derivative instruments, assuming a 10% unfavorable change in the underlying exchange rates, would be a loss of $35.7 million. The net impact on reported earnings, after also including the effect of the change in the underlying foreign currency-denominated exposures, would be a net gain of $19.3 million.

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to fluctuations in market prices for purchases of zinc and brass used in our manufacturing processes. We use commodity swaps and calls to manage such risk. The maturity of, and the quantities covered by, the contracts are closely correlated to our anticipated purchases of the commodity. The cost of calls is amortized over the life of the contracts and recorded in cost of goods sold, along with the effects of the swap and call contracts. The related amounts payable to, or receivable from, the counter-parties are included in accounts payable or accounts receivable.

Sensitivity Analysis
The analysis below is hypothetical and should not be considered a projection of future risks. Earnings projections are before tax.

At September 30, 2013, assuming a 1 percent unfavorable shift in interest rates of our variable rate Term Loan, there would be no financial impact as the underlying interest rates are currently greater than 1 percent below the floor of our variable rate Term Loan. At September 30, 2013, there were no outstanding interest rate derivative instruments.

At September 30, 2013, the potential change in fair value of outstanding foreign exchange derivative instruments, assuming a 10% unfavorable change in the underlying exchange rates, would be a loss of $35 million. The net impact on reported earnings, after also including the effect of the change in the underlying foreign currency-denominated exposures, would be a net gain of $17 million.
At September 30, 2013,2016, the potential change in fair value of outstanding commodity price derivative instruments, assuming a 10% unfavorable change decline in the underlying commodity prices, would be a loss of $2 million.$2.0 million. The net impact on reported earnings, after also including the reduction in cost of one year’s purchases of the related commodities due to the same change in commodity prices, would be a gain of $1.8 million.

58


ITEM 8.gainFINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA of $1 million.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required for this Item is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K within Item 15, Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules, inclusive and is incorporated herein by reference.


This report is a combined report of SBH and SB/RH. The notes to the consolidated financial statements include consolidated SBH Notes and certain information related to SB/RH.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of ourSBH’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, ourSBH’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by usSBH in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’sSBH’s management, including the Company’sour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. The Company’sSBH’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company’sSBH’s management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013.2016. In making this assessment, the Company’sSBH’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in the Internal Control-Control Integrated Framework (1992)(2013). The Company’sSBH’s management has concluded that, as of September 30, 2013,2016, its internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria. The Company's management excludedUnder guidelines established by the residential hardware and home improvement business (the HHI Business)SEC, companies are allowed to exclude acquisitions from itstheir first assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as the


56


Company may omit an assessment of an acquired business's internal control over financial reporting from its assessment of the registrant's internal control; however, such exclusion may not extend beyond one year fromfollowing the date of the acquisition, nor may such assessment be omitted from more than one annual management report on internal control over financial reporting. The total assets of $1,736 million and total net sales of $870 million associated with the HHI Business are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended September 30, 2013. The Company'sacquisition. SBH 's independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an audit report on the Company'sSBH 's internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in ourSBH’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ourSBH’s internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. The Company’sSBH’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’sSBH’s disclosure controls and procedures or the Company’sSBH’s internal controlscontrol over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Companywith respect to SBH have been detected.

59


ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
None.

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of SB/RH’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, SB/RH’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by SB/RH in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to SB/RH’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. SB/RH’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). SB/RH’s management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016. In making this assessment, SB/RH’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in the Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013). SB/RH’s management has concluded that, as of September 30, 2016, its internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria. Under guidelines established by the SEC, companies are allowed to exclude acquisitions from their first assessment of internal control over financial reporting following the date of the acquisition.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in SB/RH’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, SB/RH’s internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. SB/RH’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that SB/RH’s disclosure controls and procedures or SB/RH’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with respect to SB/RH have been detected.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

60


PART III


ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K concerning the directors and executive officers of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (“SB Holdings”)SBH and the nominees for re-election as directors of SB HoldingsSBH at the SBH Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on January 28, 201424, 2017 (the “2014“2017 Annual Meeting”) is incorporated herein by reference fromto the disclosures under the captions “Board of Directors” and “Executive Officers Who Are Note Directors” which will be included underin the captions “BOARD OF DIRECTORS,” “PROPOSAL 1-ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” and “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT DIRECTORS” in SB Holdings'SBH’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20142017 Annual Meeting (the “SB Holdings Definitive“Definitive Proxy Statement”), which will be filed not later than 120 days after the end of SB Holdings'the SBH’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

2016.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The information required by Items 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure which will be included under the caption “BOARD ACTIONS; BOARD MEMBER INDEPENDENCE; COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS - Committees“Committees Established by Our Board of Directors - Audit Committee”Directors” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure which will be included under the caption “SECTION“Section 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE”Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted the Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other senior finance organization employees. The Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers is publicly available on our website at www.spectrumbrands.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.” We intend to disclose amendments to, and, if applicable, waivers of, this code of ethics on that section of our website.

We have also adopted the Spectrum Brands Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, a code of ethics that applies to all of


57


our directors, officers and employees. The Spectrum Brands Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is publicly available on our website at www.spectrumbrands.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.” Any amendments to this code of ethics or any waiver of this code of ethics for executive officers or directors may be made only by our Board of Directors as a whole or our Audit Committee and will be promptly disclosed to our shareholders via that section of our website.
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The information required by Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure which will be included under the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION-Compensation“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

The information required by Item 407(e)(4)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure which will be included under the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION-Compensation“Report of the Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”of the Board of Directors” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosures which will be included under the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION”“Executive Compensation” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Ownership of Common Shares of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure which will be included under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS”“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

61


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure which will be included under the caption “EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION”“Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

The information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosures which will be included under the caption “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE”“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

Director Independence

The information required by Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosures which will be included under the captions “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTORS INDEPENDENCE -“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence” and “BOARD ACTIONS; BOARD MEMBER INDEPENDENCE; COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS”“Board Actions; Board Member Independence; Committees of the Board of Directors” in the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosures which will be included under the captions “PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2014 - Independent Auditor Fees” and “Pre-Approvalcaption “Ratification of Appointment of Independent AuditorRegistered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2017” in the Definitive Proxy Statement.

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

The following table summarizes the fees KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, billed to SB/RH for services to SB/RH and its consolidated subsidiaries, for each of the last two fiscal years:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Audit Fees

 

$

5.5 

 

$

5.2 

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees

 

0.3 

 

 

0.6 

 

All Other Fees

 

 

 

 

Total

$

5.8 

 

$

5.8 

 

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC’s definition and rules, “Audit Fees” are fees paid to KPMG LLP for professional services for the audit of SB/RH and our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K and the review of our financial statements included in Form 10-Q, or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, such as issuance of comfort letters and statutory audits required for certain of our foreign subsidiaries. “Audit-Related Fees” are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including the due diligence activities relating to mergers and acquisitions. “Tax Fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. Such fees were attributable to services for tax-compliance assistance and tax advice. “All Other Fees” are fees, if any, for any services not included in the first three categories.

Pre-Approval of Independent Auditors Services and Fees”Fees

The Audit Committee pre-approved the audit services engagement performed by KPMG LLP for the year ended September 30, 2016. In accordance with the Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policy, the Audit Committee has pre-approved other specified audit, or audit related services, provided that the fees incurred by KPMG LLP in connection with any individual engagement do not exceed $200,000 in any 12-month period. The Audit Committee must approve on an engagement by engagement basis any individual non-audit or tax engagement in any 12-month period. The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chairman the SB Holdings Definitive Proxy Statement.

authority to pre-approve any other specific audit or specific non-audit service which was not previously pre-approved by the Audit Committee, provided that any decision of the Chairman to pre-approve other audit or non-audit services shall be presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.


58

62




PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

ITEM 15.

(a)

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of or are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

1. The financial statements listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. The financial statement schedule

1.

The financial statements of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and SB/RH Holdings, LLC listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3. The exhibits

2.

The financial statement schedule of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and SB/RH Holdings, LLC listed in the Exhibit Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


3.

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



59

63



SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

This report is a combined report of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (“SBH”) and SB/RH Holdings, LLC (“SB/RH”). The notes to the consolidated financial statements include consolidated SBH footnotes and certain footnotes related to SB/RH.


60

64




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Shareholders

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, comprehensive income, (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2013. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule II.2016. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2013,2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has elected to change its method of presenting tax withholdings for share-based payment awards paid to a taxing authority on behalf of an employee from an operating activity to a financing activity within the consolidated statements of cash flows for all periods presented.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated November 27, 201317, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

November 27, 2013

17, 2016




61

65



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Shareholders

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.:

We have audited Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl – Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (COSO).

The Company acquired the residential hardware and home improvement business (the HHI Business) from Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. during the year-ended September 30, 2013. Management excluded from its assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2013 the HHI Business’ internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $1,736 million and total revenues of $870 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended September 30, 2013. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company as of September 30, 2013

We also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the HHI Business.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial positionbalance sheets of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, comprehensive income, (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2013, along with the financial statement schedule II,2016, and our report dated November 27, 201317, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

November 17, 2016

66


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholder

SB/RH Holdings, LLC:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of SB/RH Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement schedule. Our report onpresentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements refersreferred to a changeabove present fairly, in accounting principle related toall material respects, the presentationfinancial position of tax withholdings on share-based paymentsSB/RH Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the consolidated statements of cash flows.


three-year period ended September 30, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

November 27, 2013

17, 2016



62

67




SPECTRUM BR

SPECTRUM BRANDSANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

September 30, 20132016 and September 30, 2012

2015

(Amounts in thousands,millions, except per share figures)



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

275.3 

 

$

247.9 

Trade receivables, net

 

 

482.6 

 

 

498.8 

Other receivables

 

 

55.6 

 

 

87.9 

Inventories

 

 

740.6 

 

 

780.8 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

78.8 

 

 

72.1 

Total current assets

 

 

1,632.9 

 

 

1,687.5 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

542.1 

 

 

507.1 

Deferred charges and other

 

 

43.2 

 

 

42.2 

Goodwill

 

 

2,478.4 

 

 

2,476.7 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

2,372.5 

 

 

2,480.3 

Total assets

 

$

7,069.1 

 

$

7,193.8 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

164.0 

 

$

33.8 

Accounts payable

 

 

580.1 

 

 

620.6 

Accrued wages and salaries

 

 

122.9 

 

 

96.5 

Accrued interest

 

 

39.3 

 

 

63.3 

Other current liabilities

 

 

189.3 

 

 

212.7 

Total current liabilities

 

 

1,095.6 

 

 

1,026.9 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

 

3,456.2 

 

 

3,872.1 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

532.7 

 

 

572.5 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

140.6 

 

 

115.5 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,225.1 

 

 

5,587.0 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock, $0.01 par value: Authorized - 200.0 shares; Issued - 61.5 and 61.1 shares respectively; Outstanding - 59.4 and 59.4 shares, respectively.

 

 

0.6 

 

 

0.6 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

2,073.6 

 

 

2,033.6 

Accumulated earnings (deficit)

 

 

63.6 

 

 

(205.5)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

(229.4)

 

 

(200.1)

Treasury stock, at cost

 

 

(108.3)

 

 

(65.5)

Total shareholders' equity

 

 

1,800.1 

 

 

1,563.1 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

43.9 

 

 

43.7 

Total equity

 

 

1,844.0 

 

 

1,606.8 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

7,069.1 

 

$

7,193.8 
 September 30, 2013 September 30, 2012
Assets   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$207,257
 $157,961
Receivables:   
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $37,376 and $21,870, respectively481,313
 335,301
Other65,620
 38,116
Inventories632,923
 452,633
Deferred income taxes, net32,959
 28,143
Prepaid expenses and other62,833
 49,273
Total current assets1,482,905
 1,061,427
Property, plant and equipment, net412,551
 214,017
Deferred charges and other26,050
 27,711
Goodwill1,476,672
 694,245
Intangible assets, net2,163,166
 1,714,929
Debt issuance costs65,329
 39,320
Total assets$5,626,673
 $3,751,649
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity   
Current liabilities:   
Current maturities of long-term debt$102,921
 $16,414
Accounts payable525,519
 325,023
Accrued liabilities:   
Wages and benefits82,056
 82,119
Income taxes payable32,613
 30,272
Accrued interest36,731
 30,473
Other172,530
 126,330
Total current liabilities952,370
 610,631
Long-term debt, net of current maturities3,115,942
 1,652,886
Employee benefit obligations, net of current portion96,612
 89,994
Deferred income taxes, net492,774
 377,465
Other28,879
 31,578
Total liabilities4,686,577
 2,762,554
Commitments and contingencies   
Shareholders’ equity:   
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 200,000 shares; issued 53,579 and 52,799 shares, respectively; outstanding 52,210 and 51,483 shares535
 528
Additional paid-in capital1,410,738
 1,399,261
Accumulated deficit(435,911) (340,647)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(38,521) (33,435)
 936,841
 1,025,707
Less treasury stock, at cost, 1,369 and 1,316 shares, respectively(39,820) (36,612)
Total shareholders' equity897,021
 989,095
Noncontrolling interest43,075
 
Total equity940,096
 989,095
Total liabilities and equity$5,626,673
 $3,751,649

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements.

68


63




SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Income

Years ended September 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011

2014

(Amounts in thousands,millions, except per share figures)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net sales

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

3,119.3 

 

 

3,018.0 

 

 

2,856.5 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

0.5 

 

 

2.1 

 

 

3.7 

Gross profit

 

 

1,919.9 

 

 

1,670.3 

 

 

1,568.9 

Selling

 

 

776.6 

 

 

720.7 

 

 

678.2 

General and administrative

 

 

372.3 

 

 

338.8 

 

 

321.6 

Research and development

 

 

58.7 

 

 

51.3 

 

 

47.9 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

36.7 

 

 

58.8 

 

 

20.1 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

14.7 

 

 

26.6 

 

 

19.2 

Write-off from impairment of intangible assets

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

1,263.7 

 

 

1,196.2 

 

 

1,087.0 

Operating income

 

 

656.2 

 

 

474.1 

 

 

481.9 

Interest expense

 

 

250.0 

 

 

271.9 

 

 

202.1 

Other non-operating expense, net

 

 

8.6 

 

 

8.9 

 

 

6.3 

Income from operations before income taxes

 

 

397.6 

 

 

193.3 

 

 

273.5 

Income tax expense

 

 

40.0 

 

 

43.9 

 

 

59.0 

Net income

 

 

357.6 

 

 

149.4 

 

 

214.5 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

0.5 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

0.4 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

$

357.1 

 

$

148.9 

 

$

214.1 

Earnings Per Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

6.02 

 

$

2.68 

 

$

4.07 

Diluted earnings per share

 

 

5.99 

 

 

2.66 

 

 

4.02 

Dividends per share

 

 

1.47 

 

 

1.27 

 

 

1.15 

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

59.3 

 

 

55.6 

 

 

52.6 

Diluted

 

 

59.6 

 

 

55.9 

 

 

53.3 
 2013 2012 2011
Net sales$4,085,581
 $3,252,435
 $3,186,916
Cost of goods sold2,685,285
 2,126,922
 2,050,208
Restructuring and related charges9,984
 9,835
 7,841
Gross profit1,390,312
 1,115,678
 1,128,867
Selling636,958
 521,191
 536,535
General and administrative286,370
 218,832
 241,631
Research and development43,334
 33,087
 32,901
Acquisition and integration related charges48,445
 31,066
 36,603
Restructuring and related charges24,028
 9,756
 20,803
Intangible asset impairment
 
 32,450
Total operating expenses1,039,135
 813,932
 900,923
Operating income351,177
 301,746
 227,944
Interest expense375,625
 191,911
 208,329
Other expense, net3,506
 878
 2,491
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes(27,954) 108,957
 17,124
Income tax expense27,359
 60,385
 92,295
Net (loss) income(55,313) 48,572
 (75,171)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax(67) 
 
Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest$(55,246) $48,572
 $(75,171)
Basic earnings per share:     
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding52,034
 51,608
 51,092
Net (loss) income per share attributable to controlling interest$(1.06) $0.94
 $(1.47)
Diluted earnings per share:     
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding52,034
 53,309
 51,092
Net (loss) income per share attributable to controlling interest$(1.06) $0.91
 $(1.47)
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.75
 $1.00
 $

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements.


64




SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Years ended September 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011

2014

(Amounts in thousands)millions)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net income

 

$

357.6 

 

$

149.4 

 

$

214.5 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation loss, net tax of $2.3, $0.0 and $0.0, respectively

 

 

(8.5)

 

 

(113.0)

 

 

(32.6)

Unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activity, net tax of $2.9, $3.0, and $4.2, respectively

 

 

7.1 

 

 

(13.2)

 

 

11.5 

Defined benefit pension loss, net tax of $(10.8), $0.5 and $(1.6), respectively

 

 

(28.2)

 

 

(11.0)

 

 

(3.6)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

(29.6)

 

 

(137.2)

 

 

(24.7)

Comprehensive income

 

 

328.0 

 

 

12.2 

 

 

189.8 

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

0.4 

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest

 

$

328.3 

 

$

12.4 

 

$

189.4 

 2013 2012 2011
Net (loss) income$(55,313) $48,572
 $(75,171)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:     
Foreign currency translation(6,622) (8,602) (10,607)
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges(2,509) 1,545
 4,428
Defined benefit pension gain (loss)4,248
 (11,932) (770)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(4,883) (18,989) (6,949)
Comprehensive (loss) income(60,196) 29,583
 (82,120)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest136
 
 
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to controlling interest$(60,332) $29,583
 $(82,120)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements.


65

69




SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

Years ended September 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

Accumulated

 

Other

 

 

 

Total

 

Non-

 

 



 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Earnings

 

Comprehensive

 

Treasury

 

Shareholders'

 

controlling

 

Total



 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

(Deficit)

 

Loss

 

Stock

 

Equity

 

Interest

 

Equity

Balances as of September 30, 2013

 

52.2 

 

$

0.5 

 

$

1,410.7 

 

$

(435.9)

 

$

(38.5)

 

$

(39.8)

 

$

897.0 

 

$

43.1 

 

$

940.1 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

214.1 

 

 

 

 

 

 

214.1 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

214.5 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(24.6)

 

 

 

 

(24.6)

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

(24.7)

Restricted stock issued and related tax withholdings

 

0.6 

 

 

 

 

(25.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25.0)

 

 

 

 

(25.0)

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

47.7 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47.7 

 

 

 

 

47.7 

Treasury stock purchases

 

(0.1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.5)

 

 

(4.5)

 

 

 

 

(4.5)

Dividend declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(61.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(61.3)

 

 

 

 

(61.3)

Balances at September 30, 2014

 

52.7 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

1,433.4 

 

 

(283.1)

 

 

(63.1)

 

 

(44.3)

 

 

1,043.4 

 

 

43.4 

 

 

1,086.8 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

148.9 

 

 

 

 

 

 

148.9 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

149.4 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(137.0)

 

 

 

 

(137.0)

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

(137.2)

Common stock issuance

 

6.5 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

585.9 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

586.0 

 

 

 

 

586.0 

Restricted stock issued and related tax withholdings

 

0.4 

 

 

 

 

(15.4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15.4)

 

 

 

 

(15.4)

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

29.7 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.7 

 

 

 

 

29.7 

Treasury stock purchases

 

(0.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(21.2)

 

 

(21.2)

 

 

 

 

(21.2)

Dividend declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(71.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(71.3)

 

 

 

 

(71.3)

Balances at September 30, 2015

 

59.4 

 

 

0.6 

 

 

2,033.6 

 

 

(205.5)

 

 

(200.1)

 

 

(65.5)

 

 

1,563.1 

 

 

43.7 

 

 

1,606.8 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

357.1 

 

 

 

 

 

 

357.1 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

357.6 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29.3)

 

 

 

 

(29.3)

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

(29.6)

Restricted stock issued and related tax withholdings

 

0.4 

 

 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

 

 

0.4 

Share based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

39.6 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39.6 

 

 

 

 

39.6 

Treasury stock purchases

 

(0.4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(42.8)

 

 

(42.8)

 

 

 

 

(42.8)

Dividend declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(88.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(88.0)

 

 

 

 

(88.0)

Balances at September 30, 2016

 

59.4 

 

$

0.6 

 

$

2,073.6 

 

$

63.6 

 

$

(229.4)

 

$

(108.3)

 

$

1,800.1 

 

$

43.9 

 

$

1,844.0 
(In thousands)
  Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-In Capital
 Accumulated Deficit 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss), net of tax
 Treasury Stock 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 Non-controlling Interest Total Equity (Deficit)
  Shares Amount       
Balances at September 30, 2010 51,020
 $514
 $1,316,461
 $(260,892) $(7,497) $(2,207) $1,046,379
 $
 $1,046,379
Net loss 
 
 
 (75,171) 
 
 (75,171) 
 (75,171)
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 (6,949) 
 (6,949) 
 (6,949)
Issuance of common stock 1,150
 11
 29,840
 
 
 
 29,851
 
 29,851
Vesting of restricted stock units 180
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Treasury stock purchases (124) 
 
 
 
 (3,409) (3,409) 
 (3,409)
Amortization of unearned compensation 
 
 30,389
 
 
 
 30,389
 
 30,389
Restricted stock units surrendered 
 
 (2,593) 
 
 
 (2,593) 
 (2,593)
Balances at September 30, 2011 52,226
 $525
 $1,374,097
 $(336,063) $(14,446) $(5,616) $1,018,497
 $
 $1,018,497
Net loss 
 
 
 48,572
 
 
 48,572
 
 48,572
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 (18,989) 
 (18,989) 
 (18,989)
Vesting of restricted stock units 368
 3
 (3) 
 
 
 
 
 
Treasury stock purchases (1,111) 
 
 
 
 (30,996) (30,996) 
 (30,996)
Amortization of unearned compensation 
 
 29,164
 
 
 ��
 29,164
 
 29,164
Restricted stock units surrendered 
 
 (3,997) 
 
 
 (3,997) 
 (3,997)
Dividend declared 
 
 
 (53,156) 
 
 (53,156) 
 (53,156)
Balances at September 30, 2012 51,483
 $528
 $1,399,261
 $(340,647) $(33,435) $(36,612) $989,095
 $
 $989,095
Net income 
 
 
 (55,246) 
 
 (55,246) (67) (55,313)
Other comprehensive (loss) income 
 
 $
 
 (5,086) 
 (5,086) 203
 (4,883)
Vesting of restricted stock units 780
 7
 (7) 
 
 
 
 
 
Treasury stock purchases (53) 
 
 
 
 (3,208) (3,208) 
 (3,208)
Amortization of unearned compensation 
 
 31,534
 
 
 
 31,534
 
 31,534
Restricted stock units surrendered 
 
 (20,050) 
 
 
 (20,050) 
 (20,050)
Dividend declared 
 
 
 (40,018) 
 
 (40,018) 
 (40,018)
Noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 42,939
 42,939
Balances at September 30, 2013 52,210
 $535
 $1,410,738
 $(435,911) $(38,521) $(39,820) $897,021
 43,075
 $940,096

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements.


66

70




SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended September 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011

2014

(Amounts in thousands)millions)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

357.6 

 

$

149.4 

 

$

214.5 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

93.9 

 

 

87.8 

 

 

81.7 

Depreciation

 

 

89.1 

 

 

82.2 

 

 

75.9 

Share based compensation

 

 

64.4 

 

 

47.6 

 

 

46.8 

Non-cash inventory adjustment from acquisitions

 

 

 

 

21.7 

 

 

Non-cash restructuring and related charges

 

 

5.6 

 

 

19.1 

 

 

9.2 

Write off for impairment of intangible assets

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

 

11.6 

 

 

12.6 

 

 

12.8 

Write-off of debt issuance costs on retired debt

 

 

5.8 

 

 

11.2 

 

 

6.4 

Non-cash debt accretion

 

 

2.3 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

3.1 

Write-off of unamortized discount on retired debt

 

 

 

 

1.7 

 

 

2.8 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(25.5)

 

 

(4.6)

 

 

1.9 

Net changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

48.5 

 

 

93.4 

 

 

32.5 

Inventories

 

 

40.2 

 

 

(54.5)

 

 

10.6 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(7.5)

 

 

(3.1)

 

 

(0.6)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

(40.5)

 

 

48.7 

 

 

(36.5)

Other

 

 

(35.2)

 

 

(71.9)

 

 

(28.4)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

615.0 

 

 

444.3 

 

 

432.7 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(95.2)

 

 

(89.1)

 

 

(73.3)

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

 

 

(1,191.1)

 

 

(27.6)

Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment

 

 

1.0 

 

 

1.4 

 

 

9.2 

Other investing activities

 

 

(4.2)

 

 

(0.9)

 

 

(1.8)

Net cash used by investing activities

 

 

(98.4)

 

 

(1,279.7)

 

 

(93.5)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

485.0 

 

 

3,281.4 

 

 

524.2 

Payment of debt

 

 

(819.5)

 

 

(2,793.1)

 

 

(770.9)

Payment of debt issuance costs

 

 

(9.3)

 

 

(38.1)

 

 

(5.4)

Payment of cash dividends

 

 

(87.2)

 

 

(70.7)

 

 

(61.9)

Treasury stock purchases

 

 

(42.8)

 

 

(21.2)

 

 

(4.5)

Payment of contingent consideration

 

 

(3.2)

 

 

 

 

Share based tax withholding payments, net of proceeds upon vesting

 

 

(10.8)

 

 

(2.6)

 

 

(25.0)

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

562.7 

 

 

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

 

 

(487.8)

 

 

918.4 

 

 

(343.5)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents due to Venezuela devaluation

 

 

 

 

(2.5)

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(1.4)

 

 

(27.2)

 

 

(8.3)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

27.4 

 

 

53.3 

 

 

(12.6)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

247.9 

 

 

194.6 

 

 

207.2 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

275.3 

 

$

247.9 

 

$

194.6 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

253.9 

 

$

250.3 

 

$

178.7 

Cash paid for taxes

 

$

35.4 

 

$

54.4 

 

$

80.7 

Non cash investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment through capital leases

 

$

37.6 

 

$

4.1 

 

$

34.4 

Non cash financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of shares through stock compensation plan

 

$

47.9 

 

$

49.8 

 

$

40.0 

Assumption of AAG debt

 

$

 

$

540.0 

 

$

 2013 2012 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net (loss) income$(55,313) $48,572
 $(75,171)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used by operating activities:     
Depreciation62,114
 40,950
 47,065
Amortization of intangibles77,779
 63,666
 57,695
Amortization of unearned restricted stock compensation43,861
 29,164
 30,389
Amortization of debt issuance costs13,241
 9,922
 13,198
Non-cash increase to cost of goods sold from sale of HHI Business acquisition inventory31,000
 
 
Intangible asset impairment
 
 32,450
Write-off of unamortized (premium) / discount on retired debt(5,178) (466) 8,950
Write-off of debt issuance costs21,574
 2,946
 15,420
Non-cash restructuring and related charges23,245
 5,195
 15,143
Non-cash debt accretion2,482
 722
 4,773
Note retirement tender, call premium and related costs111,307
 25,400
 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:     
Accounts receivable(62,316) 22,892
 12,969
Inventories(2,707) (11,642) 96,406
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(4,269) 561
 815
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(818) 5,360
 (58,023)
Deferred taxes(21,655) 22,633
 57,314
Other changes in assets and liabilities22,162
 (7,124) (29,522)
Net cash provided by operating activities256,509
 258,751
 229,871
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(81,976) (46,809) (36,160)
Acquisition of Shaser, net of cash acquired(48,766) 
 
Acquisition of the HHI Business, net of cash acquired(1,351,008) 
 
Acquisition of Black Flag
 (43,750) 
Acquisition of FURminator, net of cash acquired
 (139,390) 
Acquisition of Seed Resources, net of cash acquired
 
 (11,053)
Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale
 
 6,997
Other investing activities(1,178) (1,545) (5,480)
Net cash used by investing activities(1,482,928) (231,494) (45,696)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from issuance of Term Loan, net of discount1,936,250
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of 6.375% Notes520,000
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of 6.625% Notes570,000
 
 
Payment of 9.5% Notes, including tender and call premium(1,061,307) 
 
Proceeds from issuance of 6.75% Notes
 300,000
 
Payment of 12% Notes, including tender and call premium
 (270,431) 
Proceeds from issuance of 9.5% Notes, including premium
 217,000
 
Payment of Senior Credit Facilities, excluding ABL revolving credit facility(571,093) (155,061) (224,763)
Prepayment penalty of term loan facility
 
 (5,653)
Debt issuance costs(60,850) (11,231) (12,616)
Other debt financing, net11,941
 392
 5,788
Reduction of other debt(1,251) (4,112) 
Cash dividends paid(40,108) (51,450) 
Treasury stock purchases(3,208) (30,996) (3,409)
Net proceeds from equity offering
 
 29,851
Share based award tax withholding payments(20,141) (3,936) (2,482)
Other financing activities
 (953) 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities1,280,233
 (10,778) (213,284)
Effect on cash and cash equivalents due to Venezuela devaluation(1,871) 
 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents - other(2,647) (932) 909
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents49,296
 15,547
 (28,200)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year157,961
 142,414
 170,614
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$207,257
 $157,961
 $142,414
      
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
Cash paid for interest$336,798
 $185,384
 $171,577
Cash paid for taxes$49,638
 $39,173
 $37,171

See accompanyingaccompany notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements.


67

71


SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

September 30, 2016 and 2015

(in millions)



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

270.8 

 

$

247.9 

Trade receivables, net

 

 

482.6 

 

 

498.8 

Other receivables

 

 

55.6 

 

 

87.9 

Inventories

 

 

740.6 

 

 

780.8 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

78.8 

 

 

72.1 

Total current assets

 

 

1,628.4 

 

 

1,687.5 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

542.1 

 

 

507.1 

Deferred charges and other

 

 

32.1 

 

 

42.1 

Goodwill

 

 

2,478.4 

 

 

2,476.7 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

2,372.5 

 

 

2,480.3 

Total assets

 

$

7,053.5 

 

$

7,193.7 

Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

164.0 

 

$

68.5 

Accounts payable

 

 

580.1 

 

 

620.6 

Accrued wages and salaries

 

 

122.9 

 

 

96.5 

Accrued interest

 

 

39.3 

 

 

63.3 

Other current liabilities

 

 

188.3 

 

 

211.9 

Total current liabilities

 

 

1,094.6 

 

 

1,060.8 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

 

3,456.2 

 

 

3,872.1 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

532.7 

 

 

572.5 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

140.6 

 

 

115.5 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,224.1 

 

 

5,620.9 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder's equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other capital

 

 

2,000.9 

 

 

1,969.9 

Accumulated earnings (deficit)

 

 

8.1 

 

 

(246.7)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

(229.4)

 

 

(200.1)

Total shareholder's equity

 

 

1,779.6 

 

 

1,523.1 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

49.8 

 

 

49.7 

Total equity

 

 

1,829.4 

 

 

1,572.8 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

7,053.5 

 

$

7,193.7 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

72


SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Consolidated Statements of Income

Years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014

(in millions)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net sales

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

3,119.3 

 

 

3,018.0 

 

 

2,856.5 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

0.5 

 

 

2.1 

 

 

3.7 

Gross profit

 

 

1,919.9 

 

 

1,670.3 

 

 

1,568.9 

Selling

 

 

776.6 

 

 

720.7 

 

 

678.2 

General and administrative

 

 

366.6 

 

 

332.4 

 

 

319.0 

Research and development

 

 

58.7 

 

 

51.3 

 

 

47.9 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

36.7 

 

 

58.8 

 

 

20.1 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

14.7 

 

 

26.6 

 

 

19.2 

Write-off from impairment of intangible assets

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

1,258.0 

 

 

1,189.8 

 

 

1,084.4 

Operating income

 

 

661.9 

 

 

480.5 

 

 

484.5 

Interest expense

 

 

250.0 

 

 

271.9 

 

 

202.1 

Other non-operating expense, net

 

 

8.6 

 

 

8.9 

 

 

6.3 

Income from operations before income taxes

 

 

403.3 

 

 

199.7 

 

 

276.1 

Income tax expense

 

 

51.0 

 

 

43.9 

 

 

59.0 

Net income

 

 

352.3 

 

 

155.8 

 

 

217.1 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

0.4 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

0.3 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

$

351.9 

 

$

155.4 

 

$

216.8 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014

(in millions)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Net income

 

$

352.3 

 

$

155.8 

 

$

217.1 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation loss, net tax of $2.3, $0.0, and $0.0 respectively

 

 

(8.5)

 

 

(113.0)

 

 

(32.5)

Unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activity, net tax of $2.9, $3.0, and $4.2, respectively

 

 

7.1 

 

 

(13.2)

 

 

11.5 

Defined benefit pension loss, net tax of $(10.8), $0.5 and $(1.6), respectively

 

 

(28.2)

 

 

(11.0)

 

 

(3.6)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

(29.6)

 

 

(137.2)

 

 

(24.6)

Comprehensive income

 

 

322.7 

 

 

18.6 

 

 

192.5 

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

0.4 

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest

 

$

323.0 

 

$

18.8 

 

$

192.1 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

73


SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity

Years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014

(in millions)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Other

 

Total

 

Non-

 

 

 



 

Other

 

Earnings

 

Comprehensive

 

Shareholder's

 

controlling

 

 



 

Capital

 

(Deficit)

 

(Loss)

 

Equity

 

Interest

 

Total Equity

Balances at September 30, 2013

 

$

1,393.1 

 

$

(469.9)

 

$

(38.5)

 

$

884.7 

 

$

49.2 

 

$

933.9 

Net income

 

 

 

 

216.8 

 

 

 

 

216.8 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

217.1 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

(24.6)

 

 

(24.6)

 

 

 

 

(24.6)

Restricted stock issued and related tax withholdings

 

 

(25.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25.0)

 

 

 

 

(25.0)

Share based compensation

 

 

45.7 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45.7 

 

 

 

 

45.7 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

(76.9)

 

 

 

 

(76.9)

 

 

 

 

(76.9)

Balances at September 30, 2014

 

 

1,413.8 

 

 

(330.0)

 

 

(63.1)

 

 

1,020.7 

 

 

49.5 

 

 

1,070.2 

Net income

 

 

 

 

155.4 

 

 

 

 

155.4 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

155.8 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

(137.0)

 

 

(137.0)

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

(137.2)

Contribution from parent

 

 

570.6 

 

 

 

 

 

 

570.6 

 

 

 

 

570.6 

Restricted stock issued and related tax withholdings

 

 

(38.4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(38.4)

 

 

 

 

(38.4)

Share based compensation

 

 

23.9 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.9 

 

 

 

 

23.9 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

(72.1)

 

 

 

 

(72.1)

 

 

 

 

(72.1)

Balances at September 30, 2015

 

 

1,969.9 

 

 

(246.7)

 

 

(200.1)

 

 

1,523.1 

 

 

49.7 

 

 

1,572.8 

Net income

 

 

 

 

351.9 

 

 

 

 

351.9 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

352.3 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29.3)

 

 

(29.3)

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

(29.6)

Contribution from parent

 

 

5.6 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.6 

 

 

 

 

5.6 

Restricted stock issued and related tax withholdings

 

 

(9.1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.1)

 

 

 

 

(9.1)

Share based compensation

 

 

34.5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34.5 

 

 

 

 

34.5 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

(97.1)

 

 

 

 

(97.1)

 

 

 

 

(97.1)

Balances at September 30, 2016

 

$

2,000.9 

 

$

8.1 

 

$

(229.4)

 

$

1,779.6 

 

$

49.8 

 

$

1,829.4 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

74


SB/RH Holdings, LLC

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014

(in millions)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

352.3 

 

$

155.8 

 

$

217.1 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

93.9 

 

 

87.8 

 

 

81.7 

Depreciation

 

 

89.1 

 

 

82.2 

 

 

75.9 

Share based compensation

 

 

59.3 

 

 

41.8 

 

 

44.9 

Non-cash inventory adjustment from acquisitions

 

 

 

 

21.7 

 

 

Non-cash restructuring and related charges

 

 

5.6 

 

 

19.1 

 

 

9.2 

Write off for impairment of intangible assets

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

 

11.6 

 

 

12.6 

 

 

12.8 

Write-off of debt issuance costs on retired debt

 

 

5.8 

 

 

11.2 

 

 

6.4 

Non-cash debt accretion

 

 

2.3 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

3.1 

Write-off of unamortized discount on retired debt

 

 

 

 

1.7 

 

 

2.8 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(14.5)

 

 

(4.6)

 

 

1.9 

Net changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

48.5 

 

 

93.4 

 

 

32.5 

Inventories

 

 

40.2 

 

 

(54.5)

 

 

10.6 

Prepaid expenses and other

 

 

(7.5)

 

 

(3.1)

 

 

0.7 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

(40.5)

 

 

48.7 

 

 

(35.9)

Other

 

 

(49.2)

 

 

(75.0)

 

 

(29.0)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

601.6 

 

 

441.8 

 

 

434.7 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(95.2)

 

 

(89.1)

 

 

(73.3)

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

 

 

(1,191.1)

 

 

(27.6)

Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment

 

 

1.0 

 

 

1.4 

 

 

9.2 

Other investing activities

 

 

(4.2)

 

 

(0.9)

 

 

(1.8)

Net cash used by investing activities

 

 

(98.4)

 

 

(1,279.7)

 

 

(93.5)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

498.9 

 

 

3,320.3 

 

 

540.1 

Payment of debt

 

 

(868.1)

 

 

(2,813.2)

 

 

(770.9)

Payment of debt issuance costs

 

 

(9.3)

 

 

(38.1)

 

 

(5.4)

Payment of cash dividends to parent

 

 

(97.2)

 

 

(72.1)

 

 

(77.0)

Payment of contingent consideration

 

 

(3.2)

 

 

 

 

Share based tax withholding payments, net of proceeds upon vesting

 

 

 

 

(2.6)

 

 

(25.0)

Capital contribution from parent

 

 

 

 

528.3 

 

 

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

 

 

(478.9)

 

 

922.6 

 

 

(338.2)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents due to Venezuela devaluation

 

 

 

 

(2.5)

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(1.4)

 

 

(27.2)

 

 

(8.3)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

22.9 

 

 

55.0 

 

 

(5.3)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

247.9 

 

 

192.9 

 

 

198.2 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

270.8 

 

$

247.9 

 

$

192.9 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

253.9 

 

$

250.3 

 

$

178.7 

Cash paid for taxes

 

$

35.4 

 

$

54.4 

 

$

80.7 

Non cash investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment through capital leases

 

$

37.6 

 

$

49.8 

 

$

40.0 

Assumption of AAG debt

 

$

 

$

540.0 

 

$

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financialstatements.


75




Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

(1)DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

This report is a combined report of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (“SBH”) and SB/RH Holdings, LLC (“SB/RH”) (collectively, the “Company”).  The notes to the consolidated financial statements that follow include both consolidated SBH and SB/RH Notes, unless otherwise indicated below.

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“SB Holdings” or the “Company”), is a diversified global branded consumer products company. Spectrum Brands, Inc. (“Spectrum Brands”), is a wholly owned subsidiary of SB Holdings. SB Holdings'SBH’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “SPB.”

The Company’s operations include the worldwide manufacturing and marketing SB/RH Holdings, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of alkaline, zinc carbon and hearing aid batteries, as well as aquariums and aquatic health supplies and the designing and marketing of rechargeable batteries, battery-powered lighting products, electric shavers and accessories, grooming products and hair care appliances. The Company’s operations also include the manufacturing and marketing of specialty pet supplies. The Company also manufactures and markets herbicides, insecticides and insect repellents in North America. The Company also designs, markets and distributes a broad range of branded small appliances and personal care products. The Company’s operations utilize manufacturing and product development facilities located in the United States ("U.S."), Europe, Latin America and Asia.
On December 17, 2012, the Company acquired the residential hardware and home improvement business (the “HHI Business”) from Stanley Black & Decker,SBH. SB/RH along with its wholly-owned subsidiary Spectrum Brands, Inc. (“Stanley Black & Decker”SBI”), which includes (i) the equity interests of issued certain debt guaranteed by domestic subsidiaries of Stanley Black & Decker engaged in the business and (ii) certain assetsCompany. See Note 10 “Debt” of Stanley Black & Decker used or heldNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for use in connection with the business (the “Hardware Acquisition”). The HHI Business has a broad portfolio of recognized brand names, including Kwikset, Weiser, Baldwin, National Hardware, Stanley, FANAL and Pfister, as well as patented technologies such as Smartkey, a rekeyable lockset technology, and Smart Code Home Connect. On April 8, 2013, the Company completed the Hardware Acquisition with the closing of the purchase of certain assets of Tong Lung Metal Industry Co. Ltd., a Taiwan Corporation ("TLM Taiwan”), which is involved in the production of residential locksets. Formore information pertaining to the Hardware Acquisition, see Note 15, “Acquisitions.”
debt. The Company sellsmanufactures, markets and/or distributes its products in approximately 140160 countries in the North America (“NA”), Europe, Middle East & Africa (“EMEA”), Latin America (“LATAM”) and Asia-Pacific (“APAC”) regions through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, industrial distributors and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), construction companies and enjoyshearing aid professionals. We enjoy strong name recognition in its marketsour regions under the Rayovac, VARTA and Remington brands, each of which has been in existence for more than 80 years, and under the Tetra, 8-in-1, Dingo, Nature's Miracle, Spectracide, Cutter, Hot Shot, Black & Decker, George Foreman, Russell Hobbs, Farberware, Black Flag, FURminator, the previously mentioned HHI Businessour various brands and various other brands.
The Company'spatented technologies. Our diversified global branded consumer products have positions in seven major product categories: consumer batteries;batteries, small appliances; pet supplies; electric shaving and grooming; electricappliances, personal care; home and garden controls; andcare, hardware and home improvement, which consists of the recently acquired HHI Business.
The Company managespet supplies, home and garden and auto care. We manage the businesses in fourfive vertically integrated, product-focused reporting segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances which consists of the Company's worldwide battery, electric shaving and grooming, electric personal care and small appliances primarily in the kitchen and home product categories (“Global Batteries & Appliances”GBA”);, (ii) Global Pet Supplies which consists of the Company's worldwide pet supplies business (“Global Pet Supplies”PET”);, (iii) Home and Garden Business, which consists of the Company's home and garden and insect control business (the “Home and Garden Business”(“H&G”); and, (iv) Hardware & Home Improvement which consists(“HHI”) and (v) Global Auto Care (“GAC”). Global and geographic strategic initiatives and financial objectives are determined at the corporate level. Each segment is responsible for implementing defined strategic initiatives and achieving certain financial objectives and has a general manager responsible for sales and marketing initiatives and the financial results for all product lines within that segment. See Note 19, “Segment Information” of Notes to the recently acquired HHI Business (“Hardware & Home Improvement”). Management reviews the performance of the Company based on these segments, which also reflect the manner in which the Company's management monitors performance and allocates resources. ForConsolidated Financial Statements for more information pertaining to our business segments, see Note 11, “Segment Information.”segments. The following table summarizes the respective product types, brands, and regions for each of the reporting segments:

Segment

Products

Brands

Regions

GBA

Consumer batteries: Alkaline, zinc carbon, and NiMH rechargeable batteries; hearing aid and other specialty battery products; battery powered portable lighting products.
Small appliances: Small kitchen and home appliances.
Personal care: Electric shaving and grooming products, hair care appliances and accessories.

Consumer batteries: Rayovac® , VARTA®.
Small appliances: Black & Decker®, George Foreman®, Russell Hobbs®, Juiceman®, Breadman®, Farberware® and Toastmaster®.
Personal care: Remington®.

NA
EMEA
LATAM
APAC

HHI

Hardware: Hinges, security hardware, screen and storm door products, garage door hardware, window hardware and floor protection.
Security: Residential locksets and door hardware including knobs, levers, deadbolts, handlesets and electronics. Commercial doors, locks, and hardware.
Plumbing: Kitchen, bath and shower faucets and plumbing products.

Hardware: National Hardware®, Stanley® and FANAL®.
Security: Kwikset®, Weiser®, Baldwin®, EZSET® and Tell®.
Plumbing: Pfister®.

NA
EMEA
LATAM
APAC

PET

Companion Animal: Dog, cat and small animal food and treats; clean-up and training aid products and accessories; pet health and grooming products.
Aquatics: Aquariums and aquatic health supplies.

Companion Animal: 8-in-1®, Dingo®, Nature's Miracle®, Wild Harvest®, Littermaid®, Jungle®, Excel®, FURminator®, IAMS®, Eukanuba®, Healthy-Hide®, ProSense®, Perfect Coat®, eCOTRITION®, Birdola® and Digest-eeze®.
Aquatics: Tetra®, Marineland®, Whisper® and Instant Ocean®.

NA
EMEA
LATAM
APAC

H&G

Controls: Outdoor insect and weed control solutions, animal repellents.
Household: Household insecticides and pest controls.
Repellents: Personal use pesticides and insect repellent products.

Controls: Spectracide®, Garden Safe®, Liquid Fence®, and EcoLogic®.
Household: Hot Shot®, Black Flag®, Real Kill®, Ultra Kill®, The Ant Trap® (TAT), and Rid-a-Bug®.
Repellents: Cutter® and Repel®.

NA
LATAM

GAC

Appearance: Protectants, wipes, tire and wheel care products, glass cleaners, leather care products, air fresheners and washes.
Performance: Automotive fuel and oil additives, and functional fluids.
A/C Recharge: Do-it-yourself air conditioner recharge products, refrigerant and oil recharge kits, sealants and accessories.

Appearance: Armor All®.
Performance: STP®.
A/C Recharge: A/C PRO®.

NA
EMEA
LATAM
APAC


76


Table of Contents


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(2)

NOTE 2 - Significant Accounting Policies and Practices

(a)

Principles of Consolidation and Fiscal Year End

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of SB Holdingsthe Company and its majority owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with U.S.Accounting Principles Generally Accepted Accounting Principlesin the United States (“GAAP”). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

The Company’s fiscal year ends on September 30. References herein to Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012Throughout the year, the Company reports its results using fiscal quarters whereby each three month quarterly reporting period is approximately thirteen weeks in length and Fiscal 2011 refer toends on a Sunday. The exceptions are the first quarter, which begins on October 1, and the fourth quarter, which ends on September 30. For the year ended September 30, 2016, the fiscal yearsquarters were comprised of the three months ended January 3, 2016, April 3, 2016, July 3, 2016 and September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.


68

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

(b) Change in Accounting Principle
During Fiscal 2013, the Company made a change in accounting principle to present tax withholdings for share-based payment awards paid to taxing authorities on behalf of employees as a financing activity within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Such amounts were previously presented within operating activities. The Company believes this change is preferable as the predominant characteristic of the transaction is a financing activity. The Company has reclassified the following amounts within its previously reported Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on a retrospective basis to reflect this change in accounting principle:
 Fiscal 2012 Fiscal 2011
Net cash used by operating activities - Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:   
As previously reported$1,424
 $(60,505)
Reclassification of share based award tax withholding payments3,936
 2,482
As reclassified$5,360
 $(58,023)
Net cash used by financing activities - Share based award tax withholding payments:   
As previously reported$
 $
Reclassification of share based award tax withholding payments(3,936) (2,482)
As reclassified$(3,936) $(2,482)
(c) Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales generally upon delivery to the customer at the shipping point in situations where the customer picks up the product or where delivery terms so stipulate. This represents the point at which title and all risks and rewards of ownership of the product are passed, provided that: there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is deemed reasonably assured. The Company is generally not obligated to allow for, and its general policy is not to accept, product returns for battery sales. The Company does accept returns in specific instances related to its shaving, grooming, personal care, home and garden, small appliances and pet products. The provision for customer returns is based on historical sales and returns and other relevant information. The Company estimates and accrues the cost of returns, which are treated as a reduction of Net sales.
The Company enters into various promotional arrangements, primarily with retail customers, including arrangements entitling such retailers to cash rebates from the Company based on the level of their purchases, which require the Company to estimate and accrue the estimated costs of the promotional programs. These costs are treated as a reduction of Net sales.
The Company also enters into promotional arrangements that target the ultimate consumer. The costs associated with such arrangements are treated as either a reduction in Net sales or an increase in Cost of goods sold, based on the type of promotional program. The income statement presentation of the Company’s promotional arrangements complies with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 605: “Revenue Recognition.” For all types of promotional arrangements and programs, the Company monitors its commitments and uses various measures, including past experience, to determine amounts to be recorded for the estimate of the earned, but unpaid, promotional costs. The terms of the Company’s customer-related promotional arrangements and programs are tailored to each customer and are documented through written contracts, correspondence or other communications with the individual customers.
The Company also enters into various arrangements, primarily with retail customers, which require the Company to make upfront cash, or “slotting” payments, in order to secure the right to distribute through such customers. The Company capitalizes slotting payments; provided the payments are supported by a time or volume based arrangement with the retailer, and amortizes the associated payment over the appropriate time or volume based term of the arrangement. The amortization of slotting payments is treated as a reduction in Net sales and a corresponding asset is reported in Deferred charges and other in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
(d) 2016.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial


69

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(e)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the

The Company considers all highly liquid debttemporary instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less from date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

(f) Concentrations of Credit Risk and Major Customers
Trade receivables subject the Company to credit risk.

Receivables

Trade accounts receivable are carried at net realizable value. The Company extends credit to its customers based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and credit history, but generally does not require collateral. The Company monitors its customers’ credit and financial condition based on changing economic conditions and will make adjustments to credit policies as required. Provisions for losses on uncollectible trade receivables are determined based on ongoing evaluations of the Company’s receivables, principally on the basis of historical collection experience and evaluations of the risks of nonpayment or return for a given customer.

See Note 6, “Receivables” for further detail.

Inventories

The Company has a broad range of customers including many large retail outlet chains, one of which accounts for a significant percentage of its sales volume. This major customer represented approximately 18%Company’s, 23% and 24% of the Company’s Net sales during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively. This major customer also represented approximately 11% and 13% of the Company’s Trade accounts receivable, net as of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively.

Approximately 41%, 46% and 44% of the Company’s Net sales during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively, occurred outside of the United States. These sales and related receivables are subject to varying degrees of credit, currency, and political and economic risk. The Company monitors these risks and makes appropriate provisions for collectibility based on an assessment of the risks present.
(g) Displays and Fixtures
Temporary displays are generally disposable cardboard displays shipped to customers to facilitate display of the Company’s products. Temporary displays are generally disposed of after a single use by the customer.
Permanent fixtures are more lasting in nature, are generally made from wire or other longer-lived materials, and are shipped to customers for use in displaying the Company’s products. These permanent fixtures are restocked with the Company’s product multiple times over the fixture’s useful life.
The costs of both temporary and permanent displays are capitalized as a prepaid asset until shipped to the customer and are included in Prepaid expenses and other in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The costs of temporary displays are expensed in the period in which they are shipped to customers and the costs of permanent fixtures are amortized over an estimated useful life of one to two years from the date they are shipped to customers. The unamortized cost of permanent fixtures is reflected in Deferred charges and other in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
(h) Inventories
The Company’s inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost of inventories is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
(i) See Note 7, “Inventory” for further detail.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost or at fair value if acquired in a purchase business combination.cost. Depreciation on plant and equipment is calculated on the straight-line methodbasis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Depreciable lives by major classification are as follows:

Building and improvements   20-40years
Machinery, equipment and other   2-15years

70

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

Plant and equipment held under capital leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset; such amortization is included in depreciation expense.
The Company reviews long-liveduses accelerated depreciation methods for income tax purposes. Useful lives for property, plant and equipment are as follows:

Asset Type

Range

Buildings and improvements

20 - 40 years

Machinery and equipment

2 - 15 years

Expenditures which substantially increase value or extend useful lives are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. The Company records gains and losses on the disposition or retirement of property, plant and equipment based on the net book value and any proceeds received.

77


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Long-lived fixed assets held and used are reviewed for impairment wheneverwhen events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an assetthe assets may not be fully recoverable. The Company evaluates recoverability of assets to be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

(j) Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are recorded at cost or at fair value if acquired in a purchase business combination. In connection with fresh-start reporting, Intangible Assets were recorded at their estimated fair value on August 30, 2009. Customer lists, proprietary technology and certain trade name intangibles are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated useful lives of up to 20 years. Excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) and indefinite-lived intangible assets (certain trade name intangibles) are not amortized. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually, at the reporting unit level with such groupings being consistent with the Company’s reportable segments. If impairment is indicated, a write-down to fair value (normally measured by discounting estimated future cash flows) is recorded. Indefinite-lived trade name intangibles are tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the fair value, determined using a relief from royalty methodology, with the carrying value. Any excess of carrying value over fair value is recognized as an impairment loss in income from operations.
ASC Topic 350: “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other,” (“ASC 350”) requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested for impairment annually, or more often if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have been incurred. The Company’s management uses its judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual impairment tests. Indicators such as unexpected adverse business conditions, economic factors, unanticipated technological change or competitive activities, loss of key personnel, and acts by governments and courts may signal that an asset has become impaired.
During Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, the Company’s goodwill and trade name intangibles were tested for impairment as of the Company’s August financial period end, the Company’s annual testing date, as well as in certain interim periods where an event or circumstance occurred that indicated an impairment loss may have been incurred.
Intangibles with Indefinite Lives
In accordance with ASC 350, the Company conducts impairment testing on the Company’s goodwill. To determine fair value during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, the Company used the discounted estimated future cash flows methodology. Assumptions critical to the Company’s fair value estimates under the discounted estimated future cash flows methodology are: (i) the present value factors used in determining the fair value of the reporting units and trade names; (ii) projected average revenue growth rates used in estimating future cash flows for the reporting unit; and (iii) projected long-term growth rates used in the derivation of terminal year values. These and other assumptions are impacted by economic conditions and expectations of management and will change in the future based on period specific facts and circumstances. The Company also tested the aggregate estimated fair value of its reporting units for reasonableness by comparison to the total market capitalization of the Company, which includes both its equity and debt securities.
In addition, in accordance with ASC 350, as part of the Company’s annual impairment testing, the Company tested its indefinite-lived trade name intangible assets for impairment by comparing the carrying amount of such trade names to their respective fair values. Fair value was determined using a relief from royalty methodology. Assumptions critical to the Company’s fair value estimates under the relief from royalty methodology were: (i) royalty rates, (ii) projected average revenue growth rates, and (iii) applicable discount rates.
In connection with the Company’s annual goodwill impairment testing performed during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, the first step of such testing indicated that the fair value of the Company’s reporting segments were in excess of their carrying amounts and, accordingly, no further testing of goodwill was required.
During Fiscal 2013, the Company concluded that the fair value of its intangible assets exceeded their carrying value.
During Fiscal 2012, the Company concluded that the fair value of its intangible assets exceeded their carrying value. Additionally, during Fiscal 2012 the Company reclassified $3,450 of certain trade names from indefinite lived to definite lived.

71

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

These trade names are being amortized over their remaining useful lives, which have been estimated to be 1-3 years.
In connection with its annual impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets during Fiscal 2011, the Company concluded that the fair values of certain trade name intangible assets were less than the carrying amounts of those assets. As a result, during Fiscal 2011 the Company recorded a non-cash pretax intangible asset impairment charge of approximately $32,450 which was equal to the excess of the carrying amounts of the intangible assets over the fair value of such assets. This non-cash impairment of trade name intangible assets has been recorded as a separate component of Operating expenses. This impairment of trade name intangible assets was primarily attributed to lower forecasted profits, reflecting more conservative growth rates versus those originally assumed by the Company at the time of acquisition or upon adoption of fresh start reporting.
A triggering event occurred in Fiscal 2011 which required the Company to test its indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment between annual impairment dates. On October 1, 2010, the Company realigned its operating segments, which constituted a triggering event for impairment testing. In connection with this interim test, the Company compared the fair value of its reporting segments to their carrying amounts both before and after the change in segment composition, and determined the fair values were in excess of their carrying amounts and, accordingly, no further testing of goodwill was required. The Company also tested the recoverability of its identified indefinite-lived intangibles in connection with the realignment of its operating segments and concluded that the fair values of these assets exceeded their carrying values.
Intangibles with Definite or Estimable Useful Lives
The Company assesses the recoverability of intangible assets with definite or estimable useful lives whenever an event or circumstance occurs that indicates an impairment loss may have been incurred. The Company assesses the recoverability of these intangible assets by determining whether their carrying value can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows. If projected undiscounted future cash flows indicate that the carrying value of the assets will not be recovered, an adjustment would be made to reduce the carrying value to an amount equal to estimated fair value determined based on projected future cash flows discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. The cash flow projections used in estimating fair value are based on historical performance and management’s estimate of future performance, giving consideration to existing and anticipated competitive and economic conditions.
Impairment reviews are conducted at the judgment of management when it believes that a change in circumstances in the business or external factors warrants a review. Circumstances such as the discontinuation of a product or product line, a sudden or consistent decline in the sales forecast for a product, changes in technology or in the way an asset is being used, a history of operating or cash flow losses or an adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, among others, may trigger an impairment review. If such indicators are present, the Company performs undiscounted cash flow analyses to determine if impairment exists. The asset value would be deemed impaired if the undiscounted cash flows generated did not exceed the carrying value of the asset. If impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. There were no triggering events identified during the year that necessitated an impairment test over property, plant and equipment. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

See Note 8, “Property, plant and equipment” for further detail.

Goodwill

Goodwill reflects the excess of acquisition cost over the aggregate fair value assigned to identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is assessed for impairment at least annually and as triggering events or indicators of potential impairment are identified. Goodwill has been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing based upon the relative fair value of the asset to each reporting unit; our reporting units are consistent with our segments. See Note 19, “Segment Information” for further discussion. The Company performs its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year.

Impairment of goodwill is evaluated using a two-step approach. In the first step, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value, including goodwill. In estimating the fair value of our reporting units, we use a discounted cash flow methodology, which requires us to estimate future revenues, expenses, and capital expenditures and make assumptions about our weighted average cost of capital and perpetuity growth rate, among other variables. We test the aggregate estimated fair value of our reporting units by comparison to our total market capitalization, including both equity and debt capital. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, step two is performed. For step two, the implied fair value of goodwill is calculated by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets, including unrecognized intangible assets, of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss would be recognized equal to that excess. The fair values of the GBA, HHI, PET, H&G and GAC reporting units exceeded their carrying values by 157%, 110%, 58%, 326%, and 12%, respectively. As a result, a step two analysis was not required and there were no reporting units that were deemed at risk of impairment.

See Note 9 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for further detail.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are recorded at cost or at estimated fair value if acquired in a business combination. Customer lists, proprietary technology and certain trade name intangibles are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated useful lives. The range and weighted average useful lives for definite-lived intangibles assets are as follows:

Asset Type

Range

Weighted Average

Customer relationships

2 - 20 years

18.5 years

Technology assets

5 - 18 years

11.2 years

Tradenames

5 - 13 years

11.4 years

Definite-lived intangible assets held and used are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If indicators of potential impairment are identified, the Company performs undiscounted cash flow analysis to determine if impairment exists. The asset value would be deemed impaired if the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset did not exceed its carrying value. If impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. There were no triggering events identified during the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 that necessitated an impairment test of definite-lived intangible assets.

(k)

78


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Certain trade name intangible assets have an indefinite life and are not amortized; but instead are assessed for impairment at least annually and as triggering events or indicators of potential impairment are identified. The Company performs its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. Impairment of indefinite lived intangible assets is assessed by comparing the estimated fair value of the identified trade names to their carrying value to determine if potential impairment exists. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded for the excess. The fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets is determined using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty methodology, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future revenues, royalty rates, and the discount rate, among others. During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized $4.7 million impairment on indefinite life intangible asset due to the reduction in value of certain tradenames in response to changes in management’s strategy. There was no impairment loss on indefinite-lived intangible assets for the years ended September 30, 2015 or 2014.

See Note 9, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for further detail.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs are capitalizeddeferred and amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the lives of the related debt agreements.

(l) Accounts Payable
Included Debt issuance costs were $56.9 million and $65.1 million as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in accounts payableLong Term Debt, Net of Current Portion in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Amortization of debt issuance costs is recognized as Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments are book overdrafts,used by the Company principally in the management of its interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate and raw material price exposures. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Derivative assets and liabilities are reported at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. When hedge accounting is elected at inception, the Company formally designates the financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure and documents both the risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge. Depending on the nature of derivatives designated as hedging instruments, changes in fair value are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets or liability through earnings, or recognized in equity through other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized. Any ineffective portion of a financial instrument’s change in fair value is recognized in earnings. For derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, the change in the fair value is recognized in earnings. See Note 12, “Derivatives��� for further detail.

Treasury Stock

Treasury stock purchases are stated at cost and presented as a separate reduction of equity.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from product sales generally upon delivery to the customer, or at the shipping point in situations where the customer picks up the product or where delivery terms so stipulate. This represents the point at which title and risks and rewards of ownership of the product are passed, provided that there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance, there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and ability to collect is deemed reasonably assured. The provision for customer returns is based on historical sales and returns and other relevant information. The Company estimates and accrues the cost of returns, which are treated as a reduction of Net Sales.

The Company enters into promotional arrangements, primarily with retail customers, that entitle such retailers to earn rebates from the Company. These arrangements require the Company to estimate and accrue the costs of these programs, which are treated as a reduction of Net Sales.

The Company enters into promotional arrangements that target the ultimate consumer. The costs associated with such arrangements are treated as either a reduction in Net Sales or an increase in Cost of Goods Sold, based on the type of promotional program. The Company monitors its commitments under all promotion arrangements and uses various measures, including past experience, to estimate the earned, but unpaid, promotional costs. The terms of the Company’s customer-related promotional arrangements and programs are tailored to each customer and documented through written contracts, correspondence or other communications with the individual customers.

79


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company also enters into various arrangements, primarily with retail customers, which require the Company to make upfront cash payments in order to secure the right to distribute through such customers. The Company capitalizes these payments provided the payments are supported by a time or volume based arrangement with the retailer, and amortizes the associated payment over the appropriate time or volume-based term of the arrangement. Capitalized payments are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as Deferred Charges and Other Assets and related amortization is treated as a reduction in Net Sales.

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs include costs incurred with third-party carriers to transport products to customers and salaries and overhead costs related to activities to prepare the Company’s products for shipment at the Company’s distribution facilities. Shipping and handling costs was $294.7 million, $272.9 million and $260.3 million during the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Shipping and handling costs are included in Selling Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs include agency fees and other costs to create advertisements, as well as costs paid to third parties to print or broadcast the Company’s advertisements and are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred advertising costs of $39.8 million, $35.0 million and $21.4 million during the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Advertising costs are included in Selling Expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense in the period they are incurred.

Environmental Expenditures

Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or to conditions caused by past operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. The Company determines its liability for environmental matters on a site-by-site basis and records a liability at the time when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and such liability can be reasonably estimated. The estimated liability is not reduced for possible recoveries from insurance carriers. Estimated environmental remediation expenditures are included in the determination of the net realizable value recorded for assets held for sale.

Restructuring and Related Charges

Restructuring charges include, but are not limited to, the costs of deposits on hand, on disbursement accounts thatone-time termination benefits such as severance costs and retention bonuses, and contract termination costs consisting primarily of lease termination costs. Related charges, as defined by the Company, include, but are replenished when checksnot limited to, other costs directly associated with exit and relocation activities, including impairment of property and other assets, departmental costs of full-time incremental employees, and any other items related to the exit or relocation activities. Costs for such activities are presentedestimated by management after evaluating detailed analyses of the costs to be incurred.

Liabilities from restructuring and related charges are recorded for payment.estimated costs of facility closures, significant organizational adjustments and measures undertaken by management to exit certain activities. Costs for such activities are estimated by management after evaluating detailed analyses of the costs to be incurred. Such liabilities could include amounts for items such as severance costs and related benefits, impairment of property and equipment and other current or long term assets, lease termination payments and any other items directly related to the exit activities.

Restructuring and related charges associated with manufacturing and related initiatives are recorded in Cost of Goods Sold. Restructuring and related charges reflected in Cost of Goods Sold include, but are not limited to, termination and related costs associated with manufacturing employees, asset impairments relating to manufacturing initiatives and other costs directly related to the manufacturing component of a restructuring initiative. Restructuring and related charges associated with administrative functions are recorded in operating expenses, such as initiatives impacting sales, marketing, distribution or other non-manufacturing related functions. Restructuring and related charges reflected in operating expenses include, but are not limited to, termination and related costs, any asset impairments relating to the administrative functions and other costs directly related to the administrative components of the restructuring initiatives implemented. See Note 4, “Restructuring and Related Charges” for further detail.

80


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(m)

Acquisition and Integration Related Charges

Acquisition and integration related charges include, but are not limited to, transaction costs such as banking, legal, accounting and other professional fees directly related to both consummated acquisitions and acquisition targets, termination and related costs for transitional and certain other employees, integration related professional fees and other post business combination expenses associated with integration activity. See Note 3, “Acquisitions” for further detail.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in income tax expense in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. Accrued interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recorded in Income tax expense.


72

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

(n)

See Note 14, “Income Taxes” for further detail.

Foreign Currency Translation

Local currencies are considered the functional currencies for most of the Company’s operations outside the United States. Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange existing at year-end, with revenues, expenses and cash flows translated at the average of the monthly exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from translation of the financial statements are recorded as a component of equity in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”). Also included in AOCI are, including the effects of exchange rate changes on intercompany balances of a long-term investment nature.

As of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, accumulated (losses) gains related to foreign currency translation adjustments of $(7,050) and $(225), respectively, were reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position in AOCI.
See Note 17, “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” for further detail.

Foreign currency transaction gains and losses related to assets and liabilities that arefor transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are reported in Other Non-Operating Expense, Net in the Consolidated Statements of OperationsIncome in the period they occur. Exchange losses on foreign currency transactions aggregating were $$9,38810.2 ,million, $9.6 million, and $6.8 million for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, $1,654Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The ASU provides for changes to the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to employees; primarily income taxes upon award vest or settlement, cash flow presentations of excess tax benefits and $3,370employee withheld taxes paid, as well as an entity forfeiture policy election. The ASU is effective for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim period within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any interim or annual period. The Company has elected to early adopt, effective as if adopted the first day of the fiscal year, October 1, 2015.Fiscal 2011, respectively, are included in Other expense, net,

Under the new guidance, all excess tax benefits (“windfalls”) and deficiencies (“shortfalls”) related to employee stock compensation will be recognized within income tax expense. Under prior guidance, windfalls were recognized to additional paid-in capital and shortfalls were only recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statementsextent they exceed the pool of Operations.

(o) Shipping and Handling Costs
windfall tax benefits. As of September 30, 2015, there was $22.2 million of unrecognized deferred tax assets attributable to excess tax benefits that were not previously recognized as they did not reduce income taxes payable. The Company incurred shipping and handling costscumulative adjustment for the adoption did not have an impact on net equity as the incremental deferred tax assets are fully reserved by an incremental valuation allowance as of September 30, 2015. The adoption of the new standard impacted our previously reported quarterly results for the recognition of excess tax benefits in our provision for income taxes rather than paid in capital.

81


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, $246,090, $198,152Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. and $201,480 during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively. Shipping and handling costs, which are included in Selling expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, include costs incurred with third-party carriers to transport products to customers and salaries and overheadThis ASU requires debt issuance costs related to activitiesa recognized debt liability to preparebe presented on a balance sheet as a direct deduction from the Company’s products for shipment atdebt liability, similar to the Company’s distribution facilities.

(p) Advertising Costs
The Company incurred advertising costspresentation of $22,971, $20,706 and $30,673 during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively. Such advertising costs are included in Selling expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and include agency fees and other costsdebt discounts. Current guidance generally requires entities to create advertisements, as well ascapitalize costs paid to third parties that are directly related to printissuing debt and that otherwise wouldn’t be incurred, and present those amounts separately as deferred charges. During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company retrospectively applied the adoption of this ASU, resulting in a reclassification of $65.1 million of debt issuance costs as of September 30, 2015.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The ASU simplifies the presentation of deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on a balance sheet. Current guidance requires an entity to separate deferred income tax assets and liabilities into current and noncurrent amounts. The new guidance requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be presented as noncurrent as the separate current classification results in little to no benefit to users of the financial statements because the classification does not generally align with the time period in which the recognized deferred tax amounts are expected to be recovered or broadcastsettled. During the Company’s advertisements.

(q) Researchyear ended September 30, 2016, the Company retrospectively applied the adoption of this ASU, resulting in a reclassification of $44.7 million of current deferred tax assets and Development Costs
Research$4.6 million of current deferred tax liabilities as of September 30, 2015.

The following is a summary of the reclassifications from the retrospective adoption of ASU 2015-03 and development costsASU 2015-17 discussed above, as of September 30, 2015 for SBH and SB/RH, respectively:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

Statement of Financial Position (in millions)

 

As Reported

 

Reclassification

 

As Reclassified

 

As Reported

 

Reclassification

 

As Reclassified

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

116.8 

 

$

(44.7)

 

$

72.1 

 

$

116.8 

 

$

(44.7)

 

$

72.1 

Deferred charges and other

 

 

101.7 

 

 

(59.5)

 

 

42.2 

 

 

101.6 

 

 

(59.5)

 

 

42.1 

Other current liabilities

 

 

(217.3)

 

 

4.6 

 

 

(212.7)

 

 

(216.5)

 

 

4.6 

 

 

(211.9)

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

 

(3,937.2)

 

 

65.1 

 

 

(3,872.1)

 

 

(3,937.2)

 

 

65.1 

 

 

(3,872.1)

Deferred taxes (noncurrent liability)

 

 

(607.0)

 

 

34.5 

 

 

(572.5)

 

 

(607.0)

 

 

34.5 

 

 

(572.5)

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. The ASU simplifies the presentation of provisional amounts recognized in a business combination during the measurement period (one year from the date of acquisition). Current guidance requires retrospective adjustment of prior periods; the new guidance eliminates this requirement. The Company applied the adoption of this ASU effective the first day of the year ending September 30, 2016 and all subsequent measurement period adjustments are charged to expenserecorded in the period they are incurred.

(r) Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share
Basic net (loss) income per common share is computed by dividing net (loss) incomeidentified, resulting in the recognition of adjustments to goodwill from the Armored AutoGroup (“AAG”) acquisition. See Note 9 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, for adjustments to goodwill.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU requires revenue recognition to depict the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new revenue recognition model requires identifying the contract and performance obligations, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to performance obligations and recognizing the revenue upon satisfaction of performance obligations. This ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. This ASU can be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the updates recognized at the date of the initial application along with additional disclosures. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Deferral of the Effective Date, which amends the previously issued ASU to provide for a one year deferral from the original effective date. As a result, the ASU will become effective for us beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, with early application only being available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Basic net (loss) income per common share does not consider the effect of dilutive common stock equivalents. As long as their effect is not antidilutive, diluted net (loss) income per common share reflects the dilution that would occur if employee stock units and restricted stock awards were exercised or converted into common shares or resultedus beginning in the issuancefirst quarter of common shares that then shared inour fiscal year ending September 30, 2018. We are assessing the net (loss) incomeimpact this pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements of the entity. The computationCompany and have not determined the materiality or method of diluted net (loss) income per common share uses the “treasury stock” method to reflect dilution. The difference between the number of shares used in the calculations of basic and diluted net (loss) income per share is due to the effects of restricted stock and assumed conversion of employee stock unit awards.

adoption.

Net (loss) income per common share is calculated based upon the following shares:
 Fiscal 2013 Fiscal 2012 Fiscal 2011
Basic52,034
 51,608
 51,092
Effect of restricted stock
 1,701
 
Diluted52,034
 53,309
 51,092
During Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2011, the Company has not assumed the exercise of common stock equivalents as the impact would be antidilutive due to the net losses reported.

73

82


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes the lease requirements in ASC 840, Leases. This ASU requires lessees to recognize lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet, as well as disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Although the new ASU requires both operating and finance leases to be disclosed on the balance sheet, a distinction between the two types still exists as the economics of leases can vary. The ASU can be applied using a modified retrospective approach, with a number of optional practical expedients relating to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before the effective date, along with the ability to use hindsight in the evaluation of lease decisions, that entities may elect to apply. As a result, the ASU will become effective for us beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, with early adoption applicable. We are assessing the impact this pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and have not determined the materiality or method of adoption.  

NOTE 3 - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)


(s) Environmental Expenditures
Environmental expenditures that relate to current ongoing operations or to conditions caused by past operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. ACQUISITIONS

The Company determines its liabilityaccounts for environmental matters onacquisitions by applying the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires, among other things, that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a site-by-site basisbusiness combination be measured at their fair values as of the closing date of the acquisition.

Armored AutoGroup

On May 21, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of AAG, a consumer products company consisting primarily of Armor All® branded automotive aftermarket appearance products, STP® branded performance chemicals and records a liability at the time when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and such liability can be reasonably estimated.A/C PRO® branded do-it-yourself automotive air conditioner recharge products. The estimated liability is not reduced for possible recoveries from insurance carriers. Estimated environmental remediation expendituresresults of AAG’s operations since May 21, 2015 are included in the determinationCompany’s Consolidated Statements of Income, and reported as a separate reporting segment under GAC for the years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

The Company has recorded an allocation of the net realizable value recorded for assets held for sale.

(t) Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conformpurchase price to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of cash flows, operations or accumulated deficit.
(u) Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive (loss) income includes foreign currency translation gainsCompany’s tangible and losses onidentifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of foreign subsidiaries, effects of exchange rate changes on intercompany balances of a long-term nature and transactions designated as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign subsidiary, deferred gains and losses on derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges and amortization of deferred gains and losses associated with the Company’s pension plans. The foreign currency translation gains and losses for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011May 21, 2015 acquisition date. Measurement period adjustments were primarily attributablerecorded subsequent to the impact of translationacquisition date in the period identified. The excess of the net assets of the Company’s European and Latin American operations, which primarily have functional currencies in Euros, Pounds Sterling, Mexican Peso and Brazilian Real. Except for gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes on intercompany balances of a long-term nature, and prior to September 30, 2011, the Company did not provide income taxes on currency translation adjustments, as earnings from international subsidiaries were considered to be permanently reinvested. As of the beginning of Fiscal 2012, the Company is no longer considering current and future earnings from international subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested, except for in locations where the Company is precluded by certain restrictions from repatriating earnings.
For information pertaining to the reclassification of unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments, see Note 7, “Derivative Financial Instruments.”

74

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

The following is a roll forward of the amounts recorded in AOCI:
  Fiscal 2013 Fiscal 2012 Fiscal 2011
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments:      
Beginning balance $(225) $8,377
 $18,984
Gross change before reclassification adjustment (6,622) (8,602) (12,857)
Gross change after reclassification adjustment $(6,622) $(8,602) $(12,857)
Deferred tax effect 
 
 2,742
Deferred tax valuation allowance 
 
 (492)
Other Comprehensive Loss $(6,622) $(8,602) $(10,607)
Noncontrolling interest 203
 
 
Ending balance $(7,050) $(225) $8,377
       
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges:      
Beginning balance $218
 $(1,327) $(5,755)
Gross change before reclassification adjustment (2,013) (1,824) (5,992)
Net reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in earnings (920) 3,097
 13,422
Gross change after reclassification adjustment $(2,933) $1,273
 $7,430
Deferred tax effect (234) (636) (2,671)
Deferred tax valuation allowance 658
 908
 (331)
Other Comprehensive Income $(2,509) $1,545
 $4,428
Ending balance $(2,291) $218
 $(1,327)
       
Defined Benefit Pension Plans:      
Beginning balance $(33,428) $(21,496) $(20,726)
Gross change before reclassification adjustment 8,097
 (15,682) (6,344)
Net reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in Cost of goods sold 1,571
 900
 (174)
Net reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in Selling expenses (584) 
 69
Net reclassification adjustment for losses included in General and administrative expenses 373
 
 113
Gross change after reclassification adjustment $9,457
 $(14,782) $(6,336)
Deferred tax effect (5,123) 3,632
 2,037
Deferred tax valuation allowance (86) (782) 3,529
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income $4,248
 $(11,932) $(770)
Ending balance $(29,180) $(33,428) $(21,496)
       
Total Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax $(4,883) $(18,989) $(6,949)
       
Total ending AOCI $(38,521) $(33,435) $(14,446)
(v) Stock Compensation
The Company measures the cost of its stock-based compensation plans, which include restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, based onpurchase price over the fair value of the awards atnet tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill, which includes value associated with the dateassembled workforce, including an experienced research team. The calculation of grantpurchase price and recognizes these costs over the requisite servicepurchase price allocation, including measurement period of the awards.adjustments, is as follows:

(in millions)

Purchase Price

Cash consideration

$

929.3 

(in millions)

Purchase Price Allocation

Cash and cash equivalents

$

30.9 

Receivables

156.5 

Inventories

82.5 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

8.2 

Property, plant and equipment, net

37.6 

Goodwill

975.4 

Intangible assets

418.0 

Deferred charges and other

16.5 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

(119.2)

Long-term debt

(540.0)

Other long term liabilities

(137.1)

Net assets acquired

$

929.3 

In September 2009, SB Holdings’ board of directors (the “Board”) adopted the 2009 Spectrum Brands Inc. Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). Prior to October 21, 2010, up to 833,333 shares of common stock, net of forfeitures and cancellations, could have been issued under the 2009 Plan. After October 21, 2010, no further awards may be made under the 2009 Plan.


75


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts

The purchase price allocation resulted in thousands, except per share figures)


goodwill of $975.4 million of which $In June 2010, SB Holdings adopted the4.9 million is deductible for tax purposes. Due to expected synergies in sales of legacy Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Award Plan (formerly known as the Russell Hobbs Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Award Plan, as amended on June 24, 2008) (the “RH Plan”). Prior to October 21, 2010, up to 600 shares of common stock, net of forfeitures and cancellations, could have been issued under the RH Plan. After October 21, 2010, no further awards may be made under the RH Plan.
On October 21, 2010, the Board adopted the Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Award Plan (the “2011 Plan”), which was approved at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on March 1, 2011. Up to 4,626 shares of common stock of SB Holdings, net of cancellations, may be issued under the 2011 Plan.
Total stock compensation expense associated with restricted stock units recognized bybranded products through new distribution channels, the Company during Fiscal 2013 was $43,861.has allocated $38.9 million of the acquired goodwill to its GBA segment. The amounts before taxremaining $936.5 million of goodwill is allocated to the GAC segment. The values allocated to intangible assets and the weighted average useful lives are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Carrying Amount

 

Weighted Average Useful Life (Years)

Tradenames

 

$

295.0 

 

Indefinite

Technology

 

 

41.0 

 

10

Licensing agreements

 

 

19.0 

 

10

Customer relationships

 

 

63.0 

 

15

Total intangibles acquired

 

$

418.0 

 

 

The Company performed a valuation of the acquired inventories; property, plant and equipment; tradenames; technologies; licensing agreements; and customer relationships.The following is a summary of significant inputs to the valuation:

·

Inventories – The replacement cost approach was applied to estimate the fair value of the raw materials and unbranded finished goods inventory. Branded finished goods were valued based on the comparative sales method, which estimates the expected sales price of the finished goods inventory, reduced for all costs expected to be incurred in its completion or disposition and a profit on those costs.

·

Property, plant and equipment – The market approach was used to estimate the fair value of land. The direct cost approach was used to estimate the fair value of property, plant and equipment.

·

Tradenames – The Company valued indefinite-lived trade names using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade names were not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions, related trademarks and trade names, other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and perceived contribution of the trade names.

·

Technology – The Company valued technology using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the technology was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions, related licensing agreements and the importance of the technology and profit levels, among other considerations. The Company anticipates using these technologies through the legal life of the underlying patents; therefore, the expected useful life of these technologies is based on the remaining life of the underlying patents.

·

Licensing Agreements – The Company valued licensing agreements using the income approach. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the revenue stream over the implied life of the agreements.

·

Customer relationships – The Company valued customer relationships using an income approach, the multi-period excess earnings method. In determining the fair value of the customer relationships, the multi-period excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the customer relationship after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. Only expected sales from current customers were used, which are estimated using annual expected growth rates of 2.0% to 12.1%. The Company assumed a customer retention rate of approximately 95.0%, which is supported by historical retention rates. Income taxes were estimated at 38% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 9.5%.

The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information presents the Company’s pro forma results for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 had the results of AAG been combined as of October 1, 2013:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2015

 

2014

(in millions)

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Unaudited)

Pro forma net sales

 

$

4,966.2 

 

$

4,872.4 

Pro forma net income

 

$

217.3 

 

$

235.5 

84


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The 2015 unaudited pro forma combined financial results exclude (1) a non-recurring interest expense of $35.7 million related to the extinguishment of AAG debt recognized in connection with the acquisition, (2) $47.3 million of acquisition and integration related charges incurred as a result of the acquisition (3) $18.8 million of non-recurring expense related to the fair value adjustment to acquisition date inventory and (4) $10.4 million of accelerated share based compensation costs incurred as a result of the acquisition.

Salix

On January 16, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of Salix, a vertically integrated producer and distributor of natural rawhide dog chews, treats and snacks. The results of Salix’s operations are included in General and administrative expenses in the accompanyingCompany’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Total stock compensation expense associated with restricted stock units recognized byIncome, and as part of the PET segment.

The Company during Fiscal 2012 was $29,164. The amounts before tax are included in General and administrative expenses inhas recorded an allocation of the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, of which $131, relatedpurchase price to the accelerated vestingCompany’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of certain awards to terminated employees.

Total stock compensation expense associated with restricted stock units recognized by the Company during Fiscal 2011 was $30,389.January 16, 2015 acquisition date. The amounts before tax are included in General and administrative expenses inexcess of the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, of which $467, related topurchase price over the accelerated vesting of certain awards to terminated employees.
The Company granted approximately 700 restricted stock units during Fiscal 2013. Of these grants, 48 restricted stock units are time-based and vest over a period of one year. Of the remaining 652 restricted stock units, 90 are performance-based and vest over a one year period and 562 are both performance and time-based and vest over a one year performance-based period followed by a one year time-based period. The total marketfair value of the restricted stock units onnet tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill, which includes value associated with the dateassembled workforce, including an experienced research team. The calculation of the grantpurchase price and purchase price allocation is as follows:

(in millions)

Purchase Price

Cash consideration

$

146.8 

Contingent consideration

1.5 

Total purchase price

$

148.3 

(in millions)

Purchase Price Allocation

Cash and cash equivalents

$

0.5 

Receivables

10.7 

Inventories

17.0 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

2.5 

Property, plant and equipment, net

1.2 

Goodwill

71.5 

Intangible assets

55.5 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

(8.5)

Other long term liabilities

(2.1)

Net assets acquired

$

148.3 

The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $71.5 million of which $24.7 million is deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill was approximately $32,176.allocated to the PET segment. The values allocated to intangible assets and the weighted average useful lives are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Carrying Amount

 

Weighted Average Useful Life (Years)

Tradenames

 

$

17.0 

 

Indefinite

Definite-lived tradenames

 

 

1.0 

 

13

Technology

 

 

2.1 

 

17

Customer relationships

 

 

35.4 

 

13

Total intangibles acquired

 

$

55.5 

 

 

The Company granted approximately 863 restricted stock units during Fiscal 2012. Of these grants, 160 restricted stock units are time-based and vest overperformed a period ranging from one to two years. The remaining 703 restricted stock units are both performance and time-based and vest over a one year performance-based period followed by a one year time-based period. The total market valuevaluation of the restricted stock units on the date of the grant was approximately $24,408.

acquired inventories, property, plant and equipment, tradenames, customer relationships and non-compete agreement. A summary of the Company’s restricted stock and restricted stock unit award activity for Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, andsignificant inputs to the non-vested awards outstanding as of September 30, 2013valuation is as follows:

·

Inventories – The replacement cost approach was applied to estimate the fair value of the raw materials and unbranded finished goods inventory. Branded finished goods were valued based on the comparative sales method, which estimates the expected sales price of the finished goods inventory, reduced for all costs expected to be incurred in its completion or disposition and a profit on those costs.

·

Property, plant and equipment – The cost approach was utilized to estimate the fair value of approximately 98% of the property, plant and equipment. The sales comparison approach was used to estimate the fair value of the remaining 2% of the property, plant and equipment.

85

Restricted Stock Awards Shares 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Fair Value at
Grant Date
Restricted stock awards at September 30, 2011 123
 $24.20
 $2,977
Vested (110) 23.75
 (2,613)
Restricted stock awards at September 30, 2012 13
 $28.00
 $364
Vested (13) 28.00
 (364)
Restricted stock awards at September 30, 2013 
 $
 $
Restricted Stock Units Shares 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Fair Value at
Grant Date
Non-vested restricted stock units at September 30, 2011 1,645
 $28.97
 $47,656
Granted 863
 28.28
 24,408
Forfeited (57) 28.49
 (1,624)
Vested (520) 29.83
 (15,509)
Non-vested restricted stock units at September 30, 2012 1,931
 $28.45
 $54,931
Granted 700
 45.97
 32,176
Forfeited (302) 30.36
 (9,168)
Vested (1,211) 28.25
 (34,216)
Non-vested restricted stock units at September 30, 2013 1,118
 $39.11
 $43,723

76


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts

·

Tradenames – The Company valued indefinite-lived trade names using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade names were not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions, related trademarks and trade names, other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and perceived contribution of the trade names.

·

Technology – The Company valued technology using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the technology was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions, related licensing agreements and the importance of the technology and profit levels, among other considerations. The Company anticipates using these technologies through the legal life of the underlying patents; therefore, the expected useful life of these technologies is based on the remaining life of the underlying patents.

·

Customer relationships – The Company valued customer relationships using an income approach, the multi-period excess earnings method. In determining the fair value of the customer relationships, the multi-period excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the customer relationship after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. Only expected sales from current customers were used, which are estimated using annual expected growth rates of 0% to 12.1%. The Company assumed a customer retention rate of approximately 92.5%, which is supported by historical retention rates. Income taxes were estimated at 38% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 12% to 13%.

·

Non-compete agreement – The Company valued the non-compete agreement using the income approach that compares the prospective cash flows with and without the non-compete agreement in place. The value of the non-compete agreement is the difference between the discounted cash flows of the business under each of these two alternative scenarios, considering both tax expenditure and tax amortization benefits.

The Salix acquisition was not considered individually significant to the consolidated results of the Company and therefore pro forma results are not presented.

European IAMS and Eukanuba

On December 31, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of Procter & Gamble’s European IAMS and Eukanuba pet food business, including its brands for dogs and cats. The results of European IAMS and Eukanuba’s operations are included in thousands, except per share figures)


(w) Restructuringthe Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, and Related Charges
Restructuring charges are recognizedas part of the PET segment.

The Company has recorded an allocation of the purchase price to the Company’s tangible and measured in accordanceidentifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the December 31, 2014 acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill, which includes value associated with the provisionsassembled workforce, including an experienced research team. The calculation of ASC Topic 420: the purchase price and purchase price allocation is as follows:

(in millions)

Purchase Price

Cash consideration

$

115.7 

(in millions)

Purchase Price Allocation

Inventories

$

16.3 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

2.9 

Property, plant and equipment, net

58.3 

Goodwill

4.0 

Intangible assets

39.6 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

(2.7)

Other long term liabilities

(2.7)

Net assets acquired

$

115.7 

86


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $4.0 million which is not deductible for tax purposes“Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations,”. Goodwill was allocated to the PET segment. (“ASC 420”). Under ASC 420, restructuring charges include, butThe values allocated to intangible assets and the weighted average useful lives are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Carrying Amount

 

Weighted Average Useful Life (Years)

Tradenames

 

$

25.5 

 

Indefinite

Technology

 

 

3.6 

 

8

Customer relationships

 

 

10.5 

 

15

Total intangibles acquired

 

$

39.6 

 

 

The Company performed a valuation of the acquired inventories, property, plant and equipment, tradenames, technology and customer relationships. The following is a summary of significant inputs to the valuation:

·

Inventories – The replacement cost approach was applied to estimate the fair value of the raw materials inventory. Work-in-process and finished goods inventory were valued at estimated selling price less the sum of costs of disposal and a reasonable profit on the value added in the completion and disposal effort.

·

Property, plant and equipment – The market approach was used to estimate the fair value of land. The direct cost approach was used to estimate the fair value of property, plant and equipment.

·

Tradenames – The Company valued indefinite-lived trade names using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade names were not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions, related trademarks and trade names, other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and perceived contribution of the trade names.

·

Technology – The Company valued technology using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the technology was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions, related licensing agreements and the importance of the technology and profit levels, among other considerations. The Company anticipates using these technologies through the legal life of the underlying patents; therefore, the expected useful life of these technologies is based on the remaining life of the underlying patents.

·

Customer relationships – The Company valued customer relationships using an income approach, the multi-period excess earnings method. In determining the fair value of the customer relationships, the multi-period excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the customer relationship after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. Only expected sales from current customers were used, which are estimated using annual expected growth rates of 0% to 5.6%. The Company assumed a customer retention rate of approximately 90% to 100%, which was supported by historical retention rates. Income taxes were estimated at 25% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 12.5%.  

The European IAMS and Eukanuba acquisition was not considered individually significant to the consolidated results of the Company and therefore pro forma results are not limited to, termination and related costs consisting primarily of one-time termination benefits such as severance costs and retention bonuses, and contract termination costs consisting primarily of lease termination costs. Related charges, as defined bypresented.

Tell Manufacturing

On October 1, 2014, the Company include, butcompleted the acquisition of Tell, a manufacturer and distributor of commercial doors, locks, and hardware. The results of Tell’s operations are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, and as part of the HHI segment.

87


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company has recorded an allocation of the purchase price to the Company’s tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the October 1, 2014 acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill, which includes value associated with the assembled workforce, including an experienced research team. The calculation of the purchase price and purchase price allocation is as follows:

(in millions)

Purchase Price

Cash consideration

$

30.3 

(in millions)

Purchase Price Allocation

Cash and cash equivalents

$

1.1 

Receivables

6.0 

Inventories

7.2 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

0.6 

Property, plant and equipment, net

1.5 

Goodwill

7.1 

Intangible assets

12.5 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

(5.7)

Net assets acquired

$

30.3 

The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $7.1 million which is deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill was allocated to the HHI segment. The values allocated to intangible assets and the weighted average useful lives are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Carrying Amount

 

Weighted Average Useful Life (Years)

Tradenames

 

$

4.0 

 

Indefinite

Customer relationships

 

 

8.5 

 

13

Total intangibles acquired

 

$

12.5 

 

 

The Company performed a valuation of the acquired inventories, property, plant and equipment, tradenames and customer relationships. The following is a summary of significant inputs to the valuation:

·

Inventories – The replacement cost approach was applied to estimate the fair value of the raw materials inventory. Finished goods were valued at estimated selling price less the sum of costs of disposal and a reasonable profit on the value added in the completion and disposal effort.

·

Property, plant and equipment – The cost approach was used to estimate the fair value of approximately 97% of the property, plant and equipment. The sales comparison approach was utilized to estimate the fair value of the remaining 3% of the property, plant and equipment.

·

Tradenames – The Company valued indefinite-lived trade names using an income approach, the relief-from-royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade name was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions of Tell, related trademarks and trade names, other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and perceived contribution of the trade names.

·

Customer relationships – The Company valued customer relationships using an income approach, the multi-period excess earnings method. In determining the fair value of the customer relationships, the multi-period excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the customer relationship after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. Only expected sales from current customers were used, which are estimated using annual expected growth rates of 2.5% to 7.1%. The Company assumed a customer retention rate of approximately 90%, which was supported by historical retention rates. Income taxes were estimated at 38% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 20%.  

The Tell Manufacturing acquisition was not considered individually significant to the consolidated results of the Company and therefore pro forma results are not limited to, other costs directly associated with exit and integration activities, including impairmentpresented.

88


(x)

Acquisition and Integration Related Charges

Acquisition and integration related charges reflected in Operating expenses include, but are not limited to, transaction costs such as banking, legal, accounting and other professional fees directly related to both consummated acquisitions and acquisition targets, termination and related costs for transitional and certain other employees, integration related professional fees and other post business combination expenses associated with mergers and acquisitions.
Costs

The following table summarizes acquisition and integration related charges incurred by the Company during the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Armored AutoGroup

 

$

14.6 

 

$

21.8 

 

$

HHI Business

 

 

13.3 

 

 

12.0 

 

 

11.0 

European IAMS and Eukanuba

 

 

3.5 

 

 

9.3 

 

 

Salix

 

 

2.1 

 

 

10.7 

 

 

Other

 

 

3.2 

 

 

5.0 

 

 

9.1 

Total acquisition and integration related charges

 

$

36.7 

 

$

58.8 

 

$

20.1 

NOTE 4 - RESTRUCTURING AND RELATED CHARGES

GAC Business Rationalization Initiatives – Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011:

  2013 2012 2011
       
Russell Hobbs      
Integration costs $3,452
 $10,168
 $23,084
Employee termination charges 217
 3,900
 8,105
Legal and professional fees 39
 1,495
 4,883
Russell Hobbs Acquisition and integration related charges $3,708
 $15,563
 $36,072
HHI Business      
Legal and professional fees 27,712
 
 
Integration costs 8,864
 
 
Employee termination charges 356
 
 
HHI Business Acquisition and integration related charges $36,932
 $
 $
       
Shaser 4,828
 
 
FURminator 2,270
 7,938
 
Black Flag 154
 3,379
 
Other 553
 4,186
 531
Total Acquisition and integration related charges $48,445
 $31,066
 $36,603

(3)INVENTORIES
Inventories forDuring the Company, which are stated at the lower of cost or market, consistthird quarter of the following:
 September 30,
 2013 2012
Raw materials$97,290
 $58,515
Work-in-process40,626
 23,434
Finished goods495,007
 370,684
 $632,923
 $452,633


77

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

(4) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
  September 30,
  2013 2012
Land, buildings and improvements $164,654
 $88,580
Machinery, equipment and other 405,126
 247,065
Construction in progress 46,668
 18,366
  $616,448
 $354,011
Less accumulated depreciation 203,897
 139,994
  $412,551
 $214,017


78

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

(5)GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and intangible assets of the Company consist of the following:
 
Global Batteries &
Appliances
 Hardware & Home Improvement 
Global Pet
Supplies
 
Home and
Garden
Business
 Total
Goodwill:         
Balances at September 30, 2011$268,148
 $
 $170,285
 $171,905
 $610,338
Additions
 
 70,023
 15,852
 85,875
Effect of translation408
 
 (2,376) 
 (1,968)
Balances at September 30, 2012$268,556
 $
 $237,932
 $187,757
 $694,245
Additions67,149
 717,853
 
 1,614
 786,616
Effect of translation(2,205) (3,129) 1,145
 
 (4,189)
Balances at September 30, 2013$333,500
 $714,724
 $239,077
 $189,371
 $1,476,672
Intangible Assets:         
Trade names Not Subject to Amortization         
Balances at September 30, 2011$545,804
 $
 $205,491
 $75,500
 $826,795
Additions
 
 14,000
 8,000
 22,000
Reclassification to intangible assets subject to amortization(920) 
 (2,530) 
 (3,450)
Effect of translation542
 
 (4,819) 
 (4,277)
Balances at September 30, 2012$545,426
 $
 $212,142
 $83,500
 $841,068
Additions
 331,000
 
 
 331,000
Effect of translation1,927
 (229) 4,284
 
 5,982
Balances at September 30, 2013$547,353
 $330,771
 $216,426
 $83,500
 $1,178,050
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization         
Balance at September 30, 2011, net$481,473
 $
 $219,243
 $156,398
 $857,114
Additions
 
 65,118
 17,000
 82,118
Reclassification from intangible assets not subject to amortization920
 
 2,530
 
 3,450
Amortization during period(32,892) 
 (19,503) (11,271) (63,666)
Effect of translation(2,389) 
 (2,766) 
 (5,155)
Balance at September 30, 2012, net$447,112
 $
 $264,622
 $162,127
 $873,861
Additions29,379
 158,100
 802
 
 188,281
Amortization during period(35,553) (11,372) (21,379) (9,475) (77,779)
Effect of translation(162) (267) 1,182
 
 753
Balance at September 30, 2013, net$440,776
 $146,461
 $245,227
 $152,652
 $985,116
Total Intangible Assets, net at September 30, 2013$988,129
 $477,232
 $461,653
 $236,152
 $2,163,166

Intangible assets subject to amortization include proprietary technology, customer relationships and certain trade names, which were recognized in connection with acquisitions and from the application of fresh-start reporting in the fiscal year ended September 20, 2009. The useful lives30, 2016, the Company implemented a series of initiatives in the GAC segment to consolidate certain operations and reduce operating costs. These initiatives included headcount reductions and the exit of certain facilities. Total costs associated with these initiatives are expected to be approximately $20 million, of which $5.3 million has been incurred to date, the balance is anticipated to be incurred through September 30, 2017.

HHI Business Rationalization InitiativesDuring the fourth quarter of the Company’s intangible assets subjectyear ended September 30, 2014, the Company implemented a series of initiatives throughout the HHI segment to amortization are 9 to 17 years for proprietary technology assetsreduce operating costs and exit low margin business outside the U.S. These initiatives included headcount reductions, the exit of certain facilities and the sale of a portion of the global HHI operations. Total costs associated with the Global Batteries & Appliances segment, these initiatives of $816.6 million has been incurred to date, and completed as of September 30, 2016.

9Global Expense Rationalization Initiatives years for proprietary technology assets related toDuring the Hardware & Home Improvement segment, 4 to 9 years for proprietary technology assets related to the Global Pet Supplies segment, 15 to 20 years for customer relationshipsthird quarter of the Global Batteries & Appliances segment, year ended September 30, 2013, the Company implemented a series of initiatives throughout the Company to reduce operating costs. These initiatives consisted of headcount reductions in the GBA and PET, and within Corporate. Total costs associated with these initiatives of $2047.0 years for customer relationshipsmillion has been incurred to date, and completed as of September 30, 2016.

Other Restructuring Activities – The Company has entered or may enter into small, less significant initiatives and restructuring activities to reduce costs and improve margins throughout the Hardware & Home Improvement segment, Homeorganization. Individually these activities are not substantial, and Garden Business and Global Pet Supplies segments,occur over a shorter time period (less than 12 months). 1Total costs associated with these initiatives are expected to be approximately $6 million, of which $2.9 million has been incurred to date.12 years for trade names within the Global Batteries & Appliances segment, 5 to 8 years for trade


79

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

names within the Hardware & Home Improvement segment

The following summarizes restructuring and 3 years for a trade name within the Global Pet Supplies segment.

The carrying value and accumulated amortization for intangible assets subject to amortization are as follows:
 September 30,
2013
 September 30,
2012
Proprietary Technology Assets Subject to Amortization:   
Gross balance$172,105
 $90,924
Accumulated amortization(39,028) (22,768)
Carrying value, net$133,077
 $68,156
Trade Names Subject to Amortization:   
Gross balance$171,572
 $150,829
Accumulated amortization(44,660) (28,347)
Carrying value, net$126,912
 $122,482
Customer Relationships Subject to Amortization:   
Gross balance$885,895
 $796,235
Accumulated amortization(160,768) (113,012)
Carrying value, net$725,127
 $683,223
Total Intangible Assets, net Subject to Amortization$985,116
 $873,861

Amortization expenserelated charges for the years ended September 30, 2013, 2016, 2015, and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Global expense rationalization initiatives

 

$

5.2 

 

$

17.1 

 

$

13.4 

HHI business rationalization initiatives

 

 

1.8 

 

 

10.3 

 

 

4.5 

GAC business rationalization initiatives

 

 

5.3 

 

 

 

 

Other restructuring activities

 

 

2.9 

 

 

1.3 

 

 

5.0 

Total restructuring and related charges

 

$

15.2 

 

$

28.7 

 

$

22.9 

Reported as:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

0.5 

 

$

2.1 

 

$

3.7 

Operating expense

 

 

14.7 

 

 

26.6 

 

 

19.2 

The following summarizes restructuring and related charges for the years ended September 30, 20122016, 2015, and 2014, and cumulative costs on restructuring initiatives as of September 30, 20112016, by cost type:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Termination

 

Other

 

 

(in millions)

 

Benefits

 

Costs

 

Total

For the year ended September 30, 2016

 

 

4.3 

 

 

10.9 

 

 

15.2 

For the year ended September 30, 2015

 

 

7.0 

 

 

21.7 

 

 

28.7 

For the year ended September 30, 2014

 

 

11.2 

 

 

11.7 

 

 

22.9 

Cumulative costs through September 30, 2016

 

 

32.4 

 

 

39.4 

 

 

71.8 

89 is as follows:

 2013 2012 2011
Proprietary technology amortization$16,260
 $9,133
 $6,817
Trade names amortization16,587
 14,347
 12,558
Customer relationships amortization44,932
 40,186
 38,320
 $77,779
 $63,666
 $57,695

The Company estimates annual amortization expense of intangible assets for the next five fiscal years will approximate $78,500 per year.


80


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

(6)DEBT
Debt consists

The following is a rollforward of the following:accrual related to all restructuring and related activities, included within Other Current Liabilities, by cost type, for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Termination

 

Other

 

 

(in millions)

 

Benefits

 

Costs

 

Total

Accrual balance at September 30, 2014

 

$

9.9 

 

$

1.6 

 

$

11.5 

Provisions

 

 

5.1 

 

 

3.9 

 

 

9.0 

Cash expenditures

 

 

(9.5)

 

 

(1.7)

 

 

(11.2)

Non Cash Items

 

 

(1.2)

 

 

0.1 

 

 

(1.1)

Accrual balance at September 30, 2015

 

 

4.3 

 

 

3.9 

 

 

8.2 

Provisions

 

 

4.3 

 

 

10.9 

 

 

15.2 

Cash expenditures

 

 

(6.9)

 

 

(13.6)

 

 

(20.5)

Non-cash items

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

(0.3)

Accrual balance at September 30, 2016

 

$

1.6��

 

$

1.0 

 

$

2.6 
 September 30, 2013 September 30, 2012
 Amount Rate Amount Rate
Term Loan, due December 17, 2019$594,709
 4.7% $
 
Term Loan, due September 4, 2019300,000
 3.6% 
 
Term Loan, due September 4, 2017850,000
 3.0% 
 
Former term loan facility
 
 370,175
 5.1%
9.5% Notes, due June 15, 2018
 
 950,000
 9.5%
6.375% Notes, due November 15, 2020520,000
 6.4% 
 
6.625% Notes, due November 15, 2022570,000
 6.6% 
 
6.75% Notes, due March 15, 2020300,000
 6.8% 300,000
 6.8%
ABL Facility, expiring May 24, 2017
 5.7% 
 4.3%
Other notes and obligations28,468
 8.5% 18,059
 10.9%
Capitalized lease obligations67,402
 6.2% 26,683
 6.2%
 $3,230,579
   $1,664,917
  
Original issuance (discounts) premiums on debt(11,716)   4,383
  
Less: current maturities102,921
   16,414
  
Long-term debt$3,115,942
   $1,652,886
  

The Company’s aggregate scheduled maturities of debtfollowing summarizes restructuring and capital lease obligationsrelated charges by segment for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014, cumulative costs on restructuring initiatives as of September 30, 2013 are as follows:

2014$102,921
201579,252
201677,717
2017671,668
201811,906
Thereafter2,287,115
 $3,230,579
The Company has the following debt instruments outstanding at September 30, 2013: (i) a senior secured term loan pursuant to a senior credit agreement (the “Senior Credit Agreement”); (ii) 6.75% unsecured notes (the “6.75% Notes”); (iii) 6.375% unsecured notes (the “6.375% Notes”); (iv) 6.625% unsecured notes (the “6.625% Notes”); and (v) a $400 million asset based lending revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility,” and, together with the Term Loan, (the “Senior Credit Facilities”).
Term Loan
On December 17, 2012, Spectrum Brands entered into a senior term loan facility, maturing December 17, 2019, which provides for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of $800,000, with $100,000 in Canadian dollar equivalents (the "HHI Term Loan") in connection with the acquisition of the HHI Business. A portion of the HHI Term Loan proceeds were used to refinance the former term loan facility, which was scheduled to mature on June 17, 2016 and had an aggregate amount outstanding of $370,175 priorfuture expected costs to refinancing. In connection with the refinancing, the Company recorded accelerated amortization of portions of the unamortized discount and unamortized Debt issuance costs related to the former term loan facility totaling $5,485 as an adjustment to Interest expense during Fiscal 2013.be incurred by segment:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

GBA

 

PET

 

HHI

 

GAC

 

Corporate

 

Total

For the year ended September 30, 2016

 

$

0.8 

 

$

4.6 

 

$

4.5 

 

 

5.3 

 

$

 

$

15.2 

For the year ended September 30, 2015

 

 

8.5 

 

 

9.5 

 

 

10.3 

 

 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

28.7 

For the year ended September 30, 2014

 

 

11.2 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

8.2 

 

 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

22.9 

Cumulative costs through September 30, 2016

 

 

30.0 

 

 

15.1 

 

 

19.3 

 

 

5.3 

 

 

2.1 

 

 

71.8 

Future costs to be incurred

 

 

1.0 

 

 

1.8 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

14.6 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

17.6 
On September 4, 2013, Spectrum Brands amended the senior term loan facility, issuing a tranche maturing September 4,

81

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

2017, which provides for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of $850,000, and a tranche maturing September 4, 2019, which provides borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000, (together with the HHI Term Loan, the "Term Loan"). The proceeds from the amendment were used to extinguish the former 9.5% Notes, which were scheduled to mature on June 15, 2018, and for general corporate purposes. The 9.5% Notes had an outstanding amount of $950,000 prior to extinguishment.
The Term Loan contains financial covenants with respect to debt, including, but not limited to, a fixed charge ratio. In addition, the Term Loan contains customary restrictive covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens, make investments or specified payments, give guarantees, pay dividends, make capital expenditures and merge or acquire or sell assets. Pursuant to a guarantee and collateral agreement, the Company, its domestic subsidiaries and its Canadian subsidiaries have guaranteed their respective obligations under the Term Loan and related loan documents and have pledged substantially all of their respective assets to secure such obligations. The Term Loan also provides for customary events of default, including payment defaults and cross-defaults on other material indebtedness.
The HHI Term Loan was issued at a 1.0% discount and recorded net of the $8,000 discount incurred. The discount is reflected as an adjustment to the carrying value of principal, and is being amortized with a corresponding charge to interest expense over the remaining life of the debt. In connection with the issuance of the HHI Term Loan, the Company recorded $19,328 of fees during Fiscal 2013, of which $16,907 are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining life of the HHI Term Loan, with the remainder of $2,421 reflected as an increase to Interest expense during Fiscal 2013.
The tranches related to the amendment of the Term Loan were issued at a .5% discount and recorded net of the $5,750 discount incurred. The discount is reflected as an adjustment to the carrying value of principal, and is being amortized with a corresponding charge to interest expense over the remaining life of the debt. In connection with the amendment of the Term Loan, the Company recorded $16,381 of fees during Fiscal 2013 which are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining life of the Term Loan.
6.375% Notes and 6.625% Notes
On December 17, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of the HHI Business, Spectrum Brands assumed $520,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.375% Notes at par value, due November 15, 2020 (the "6.375% Notes"), and $570,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.625% Notes at par value, due November 15, 2022 (the "6.625% Notes"), previously issued by Spectrum Brands Escrow Corporation. The 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes are unsecured and guaranteed by Spectrum Brands’ parent company, SB/RH Holdings, LLC, as well as by existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries.
The Company may redeem all or a part of the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes, upon not less than 30 or more than 60 days notice, at specified redemption prices. Further, the indenture governing the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes (the “2020/22 Indenture”) requires the Company to make an offer, in cash, to repurchase all or a portion of the applicable outstanding notes for a specified redemption price, including a redemption premium, upon the occurrence of a change of control of the Company, as defined in such indenture.
The 2020/22 Indenture contains customary covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends on or redemption or repurchase of equity interests, the making of certain investments, expansion into unrelated businesses, creation of liens on assets, merger or consolidation with another company, transfer or sale of all or substantially all assets, and transactions with affiliates.
In addition, the 2020/22 Indenture provides for customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to make payments when due or on acceleration of certain other indebtedness, and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Events of default under the 2020/22 Indenture arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency will automatically cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes. If any other event of default under the 2020/22 Indenture occurs and is continuing, the trustee for the 2020/22 Indenture or the registered holders of at least 25% in the then aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 6.375% Notes, or the 6.625% Notes, may declare the acceleration of the amounts due under those notes.
The Company recorded $12,906 and $14,127 of fees in connection with the offering of the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes, respectively, during Fiscal 2013. The fees are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and are being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the respective remaining

82

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

lives of the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes.
9.5% Notes
On August 6, 2013, the Company launched a cash tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) and consent solicitation (the “Consent Solicitation”) with respect to any and all of its outstanding 9.5% Senior Secured Notes due in 2018 (the “9.5% Notes”). Pursuant to the Consent Solicitation, the Company received consents to the adoption of certain amendments to the indenture governing the 9.5% Notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants, certain events of default and other related provisions. The terms of the Tender Offer provided that holders of the 9.5% Notes who tendered their 9.5% Notes prior to the expiration of a consent solicitation period, which ended August 19, 2013, would receive tender offer consideration and a consent payment. Holders tendering their 9.5% Notes subsequent to expiration of the consent solicitation period, but prior to the September 3, 2013 expiration of the Tender Offer period, would receive only tender offer consideration. As of the expiration of the consent solicitation period, holders of the 9.5% Notes had tendered approximately $893,067 of the 9.5% Notes. Following the expiration of the consent solicitation period, an additional $5,000 of the 9.5% Notes were tendered. Following expiration of the Tender Offer period, the Company paid the trustee principal, interest and a call premium sufficient to redeem the remaining approximately $51,933 of the 9.5% Notes not tendered on the redemption date, October 7, 2013. The trustee under the indenture governing the 9.5% Notes accepted those funds in trust for the benefit of the holders of the 9.5% Notes and has acknowledged the satisfaction and discharge of the 9.5% Notes and the indenture governing the 9.5% Notes.

In connection with the Tender Offer, the Company recorded $105,640 of fees and expenses as a cash charge to Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during Fiscal 2013. In connection with the satisfaction and discharge process, the Company recorded cash charges of $5,667 to Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during Fiscal 2013. In addition, $10,911 of debt issuance costs and unamortized premium related to the 9.5% Notes were written off as a non-cash charge to Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during Fiscal 2013.
ABL Facility
On December 17, 2012 the Company exercised its option to increase its asset based lending revolving credit facility (the "ABL Facility") from $300,000 to $400,000 and extend the maturity to May 24, 2017. In connection with the increase and extension, the Company incurred $323 of fees during Fiscal 2013. The fees are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and are being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining life of the ABL Facility.
On March 28, 2013, the Company amended its ABL Facility to conform certain provisions to reflect the acquisition of the HHI Business. In connection with the amendment, the Company incurred $206 of fees during Fiscal 2013. The fees are classified as Debt issuance costs within the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and are being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining life of the ABL Facility.
As a result of borrowings and payments under the ABL Facility, at September 30, 2013, the Company had aggregate borrowing availability of approximately $288,901, net of lender reserves of $8,559 and outstanding letters of credit of $37,191.

(7)DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Derivative financial instruments are used by the Company principally in the management of its interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate and raw material price exposures. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Derivative instruments are reported at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. When hedge accounting is elected at inception, the Company formally designates the financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure and documents both the risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge. The Company formally assesses both at the inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the financial instruments that are used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in the forecasted cash flows of the related underlying exposure. Because of the high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the underlying exposure being hedged, fluctuations in the value of the derivative instruments are generally offset by changes in the forecasted cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. Any ineffective portion of a financial instrument’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. For derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges, or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, the change in the fair value is also immediately recognized in earnings.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

83

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

The Company discloses its derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with ASC Topic 815: “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”).
INSTRUMENTS

The fair valuevalues of the Company’s outstanding derivative contracts recordedfinancial assets and liabilities are defined as assets in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position are as follows:

Asset Derivatives  September 30, 2013 September 30, 2012
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:     
Commodity contractsReceivables—Other $416
 $985
Commodity contractsDeferred charges and other 3
 1,017
Foreign exchange contractsReceivables—Other 1,719
 1,194
Total asset derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815  2,138
 3,196
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:     
Foreign exchange contractsReceivables—Other 143
 41
Total asset derivatives  $2,281
 $3,237

The fair value of the Company’s outstanding derivative contracts recorded as liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position are as follows:
Liability Derivatives  September 30, 2013 September 30, 2012
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:     
Commodity contractsAccounts payable $450
 $9
Foreign exchange contractsAccounts payable 4,577
 3,063
Foreign exchange contractsOther long-term  liabilities 65
 
Total liability derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815  $5,092
 $3,072
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:     
Commodity contractAccounts payable 55
 
Foreign exchange contractsAccounts payable 5,323
 3,967
Foreign exchange contractsOther long-term liabilities 
 2,926
Total liability derivatives  $10,470
 $9,965
Changes in AOCI from Derivative Instruments
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the effective portion of the derivative is reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI") and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on derivatives representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. See Note 2(u), "Comprehensive Income (Loss)" for further information.
The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2013, pretax:

84

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Amount of
(Loss) Gain
Recognized in
AOCI on
Derivatives
(Effective  Portion)
 
Location of (Loss) Gain Reclassified from
AOCI into
Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Amount of (Loss) Gain
Reclassified from
AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of (Loss) Gain
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of
Loss
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
Commodity contracts$(2,615) Cost of goods sold $(632) Cost of goods sold $(39)
Foreign exchange contracts884
 Net sales 920
 Net sales 
Foreign exchange contracts(282) Cost of goods sold 632
 Cost of goods sold 
Total$(2,013)   $920
   $(39)

The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2012, pretax:
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
AOCI on
Derivatives
(Effective  Portion)
 
Location of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from
AOCI into
Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Amount of
Loss
Reclassified from
AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of
Loss
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of
Gain
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
Commodity contracts$1,606
 Cost of goods sold $(1,148) Cost of goods sold $94
Interest rate contracts15
 Interest expense (864) Interest expense 
Foreign exchange contracts61
 Net sales (474) Net sales 
Foreign exchange contracts(3,506) Cost of goods sold (611) Cost of goods sold 
Total$(1,824)   $(3,097)   $94

The following table summarizes the impact of derivative instruments on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2011, pretax:
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Amount of Loss
Recognized in
AOCI on
Derivatives
(Effective  Portion)
 
Location of
Loss
Reclassified from
AOCI into
Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from
AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 Amount of
Loss
Recognized in
Income on
Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
 
Commodity contracts$(1,750) Cost of goods sold $2,617
 Cost of goods sold $(47) 
Interest rate contracts(88) Interest expense (3,319) Interest expense (205)(A)
Foreign exchange contracts(487) Net sales (131) Net sales 
 
Foreign exchange contracts(3,667) Cost of goods sold (12,384) Cost of goods sold 
 
Total$(5,992)   $(13,217)   $(252) 

(A)Reclassified from AOCI associated with the prepayment of portions of the Senior Credit Facility.
Other Changes in Fair Value of Derivative Contracts
For derivative instruments that are used to economically hedge the fair value of the Company’s third party and intercompany foreign currency payments, commodity purchases and interest rate payments, the gain (loss) associated with the derivative contract is recognized in earnings in the period of change. During Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, the Company recognized the following gains (losses) on these derivative contracts:

85

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments Under ASC 815
Amount of (Loss) Gain
Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
 
Location of (Loss) or Gain
Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
2013 2012 2011 
Commodity contracts$(55) $
 $
 Cost of goods sold
Foreign exchange contracts(3,597) 5,916
 (5,052) Other expense, net
Total$(3,652) $5,916
 $(5,052)  
Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to the risk of default by the counterparties with which it transacts and generally does not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to credit risk. The Company monitors counterparty credit risk on an individual basis by periodically assessing each such counterparty’s credit rating exposure. The maximum loss due to credit risk equals the fair value of the gross asset derivatives that are concentrated with certain domestic and foreign financial institution counterparties. The Company considers these exposures when measuring its credit reserve on its derivative assets, which was $5 and $46 at September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively.
The Company’s standard contracts do not contain credit risk related contingent features whereby the Company would be required to post additional cash collateral as a result of a credit event. However, the Company is typically required to post collateral in the normal course of business to offset its liability positions. At September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company had posted cash collateral of $450 and $50, respectively, related to such liability positions. In addition, at September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company had no posted standby letters of credit related to such liability positions. The cash collateral is included in Current Assets—Receivables-Other within the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Cash Flow Hedges
When appropriate, the Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges with the changes in fair value recorded in AOCI and as a derivative hedge asset or liability, as applicable. The swaps settle periodically in arrears with the related amounts for the current settlement period payable to, or receivable from, the counter-parties included in accrued liabilities or receivables, respectively, and recognized in earnings as an adjustment to interest expense from the underlying debt to which the swap is designated. At September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding.
The Company periodically enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the risk from forecasted foreign currency denominated third party and intercompany sales or payments. These obligations generally require the Company to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars, Euros, Pounds Sterling, Australian Dollars, Brazilian Reals, Mexican Pesos, Canadian Dollars or Japanese Yen. These foreign exchange contracts are cash flow hedges of fluctuating foreign exchange related to sales of product or raw material purchases. Until the sale or purchase is recognized, the fair value of the related hedge is recorded in AOCI and as a derivative hedge asset or liability, as applicable. At the time the sale or purchase is recognized, the fair value of the related hedge is reclassified as an adjustment to Net sales or purchase price variance in Cost of goods sold.
At September 30, 2013, the Company had a series of foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding through September 2014 with a contract value of $255,909. At September 30, 2012 the Company had a series of foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding through September 2013 with a contract value of $202,453. The derivative net loss on these contracts recorded in AOCI at September 30, 2013 was $2,287, net of tax benefit of $637. The derivative loss on these contracts recorded in AOCI at September 30, 2012 was $1,409, net of tax benefit of $565. At September 30, 2013, the portion of derivative net loss estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months is $2,248, net of tax.

The Company is exposed to risk from fluctuating prices for raw materials, specifically zinc and brass used in its manufacturing processes. The Company hedges a portion of the risk associated with the purchase of these materials through the use of commodity swaps. The hedge contracts are designated as cash flow hedges with the fair value changes recorded in AOCI and as a hedge asset or liability, as applicable. The unrecognized changes in fair value of the hedge contracts are reclassified from AOCI into earnings when the hedged purchase of raw materials also affects earnings. The swaps effectively fix the

86

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

floating price on a specified quantity of raw materials through a specified date. At September 30, 2013, the Company had a series of zinc swap contracts outstanding through December 2014 for 8 tons with a contract value of $16,235. To hedge brass exposures, at September 30, 2013, the Company had a series of zinc and copper swap contracts outstanding through September 2014 for 1 ton with a contract value of $7,418. At September 30, 2012 the Company had a series of zinc swap contracts outstanding through September 2014 for 15 tons with a contract value of $29,207. The derivative net loss on these contracts recorded in AOCI at September 30, 2013 was $4, net of tax benefit of $32. The derivative net gain on these contracts recorded in AOCI at September 30, 2012 was $1,627, net of tax expense of $320. At September 30, 2013, the portion of derivative net loss estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months is $8, net of tax.
Derivative Contracts
The Company periodically enters into forward and swap foreign exchange contracts to economically hedge the risk from third party and intercompany payments resulting from existing obligations. These obligations generally require the Company to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars, Canadian Dollars, Euros or Australian Dollars. These foreign exchange contracts are fair value hedges of a related liability or asset recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The gain or loss on the derivative hedge contracts is recorded in earnings as an offset to the change in value of the related liability or asset at each period end. At September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company had $108,480 and $172,581, respectively, of notional value for such foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding.
The Company periodically enters into commodity swap contracts to economically hedge the risk from fluctuating prices for raw materials, specifically the pass-through of market prices for silver used in manufacturing purchased watch batteries. The Company hedges a portion of the risk associated with these materials through the use of commodity swaps. The swap contracts are designated as economic hedges with the unrealized gain or loss recorded in earnings and as an asset or liability at each period end. The unrecognized changes in fair value of the hedge contracts are adjusted through earnings when the realized gains or losses affect earnings upon settlement of the hedges. The swaps effectively fix the floating price on a specified quantity of silver through a specified date. At September 30, 2013, the Company had a series of such swap contracts outstanding through May 2014 for 45 troy ounces with a contract value of $980. At September 30, 2012, the Company did not have any commodity swap contracts outstanding.

(8)FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC Topic 820: “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands related disclosures. Broadly, the ASC 820 framework requires fair value to be determined based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820 establishesFair value measurements are classified using a fair value hierarchy that is based upon the observability of inputs used in measuring fair value. Observable inputs (highest level) reflect market or observabledata obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by(lowest level) reflect internally developed assumptions based onabout hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. data. Fair value measurements are classified under the following hierarchy:

·

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

·

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

·

Level 3 - Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.

The Company utilizes valuation techniques that attempt to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The determination of the fair values considers various factors,Company’s derivatives are valued on a recurring basis using internal models, which are based on market observable inputs including closing exchangeinterest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities, which are generally based on quoted or over-the-counterobserved market pricing quotations, time value and credit quality factors underlying options and contracts.prices (Level 2). The fair value of certain derivative financial instruments is estimated using pricing models based on contracts with similar terms and risks. Modeling techniques assume market correlation and volatility, such as using prices of one delivery point to calculate the price of the contract’s different delivery point. The nominal value of interest rate transactions is discounted using applicable forward interest rate curves. In addition, by applying a credit reserve which is calculated based on credit default swaps or published default probabilities for the actual and potential asset value, the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instrument assets reflects the risk that the counterparties to these contracts may default on the obligations. Likewise, by assessing the requirements of a reserve for non-performance which is calculated based on the probability of default by the Company, the Company adjusts its derivative contract liabilities to reflect the price at which a potential market participant would be willing to assume the Company’s liabilities. The Company has not changed itsthe valuation techniques used in measuring the fair value of any financial assets and liabilities during the year.

90

The valuation techniques required by ASC 820 are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions made by the Company. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:

87


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

Level 1 -Unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 -Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level 3 -Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.
The Company maintains policies and procedures to value instruments using the best and most relevant data available. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls must be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In addition, the Company has risk management teams that review valuation, including independent price validation for certain instruments. Further, in other instances, the Company retains independent pricing vendors to assist in valuing certain instruments.
The Company’s derivatives are valued on a recurring basis using internal models, which are based on market observable inputs including interest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities.
The Company’s net derivative portfolio as of September 30, 2013, contains Level 2 instruments and consists of commodity and foreign exchange contracts.

The fair values of thesederivative instruments as of September 30, 2013 were2016 and 2015 are as follows:follows. See Note 12, “Derivatives” for additional detail:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015



 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

Derivative Assets

 

$

8.7 

 

$

8.7 

 

$

6.0 

 

$

6.0 

Derivative Liabilities

 

$

3.2 

 

$

3.2 

 

$

9.8 

 

$

9.8 
 Level 1     Level 2 Level 3 Total
Total Assets, net$
 $
 $
 $
Liabilities:       
Commodity contracts, net$
 $(86) $
 $(86)
Foreign exchange contracts, net
 (8,103) 
 (8,103)
Total Liabilities, net$
 $(8,189) $
 $(8,189)
The Company’s net derivative portfolio as of September 30, 2012, contains Level 2 instruments and consists of commodity and foreign exchange contracts. The fair values of these instruments as of September 30, 2012 were as follows:
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:       
Commodity contracts, net$
 $1,993
 $
 $1,993
Total Assets, net$
 $1,993
 $
 $1,993
Liabilities:       
Foreign exchange contracts, net$
 $(8,721) $
 $(8,721)
Total Liabilities, net$
 $(8,721) $
 $(8,721)

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable,receivables, accounts payable and short term debt approximate fair value. The fair values of long-term publicly traded debt arevalue based on unadjusted quoted market prices (Level 1)the short-term nature of these assets and derivative financial instruments are generally based on quoted or observed market prices (Level 2).

liabilities. The carrying values of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets are tested annually or more frequently if an event occurs that indicates an impairment loss may have been incurred, using fair value measurements with unobservable inputs (Level 3).

The carrying amountsvalues and estimated fair values for debt as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015



 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

Total debt - SBH

 

$

3,620.2 

 

$

3,865.1 

 

$

3,905.9 

 

$

4,085.8 

Total debt - SB/RH

 

$

3,620.2 

 

$

3,865.1 

 

$

3,940.6 

 

$

4,120.5 

The fair value measurements of the Company’s financial instrumentsdebt represent non-active market exchange-traded securities which are summarizedvalued at quoted input prices that are directly observable or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data (Level 2).

NOTE 6 - RECEIVABLES

The allowance for uncollectible receivables as follows ((liability)/of September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $46.8 million and $44.0 million, respectively. The following is a rollforward of the allowance for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Beginning

 

Charged to

 

 

 

Other

 

Ending

(in millions)

 

Balance

 

Profit & Loss

 

Deductions

 

Adjustments

 

Balance

September 30, 2016

 

$

44.0 

 

$

15.6 

 

$

(12.0)

 

$

(0.8)

 

$

46.8 

September 30, 2015

 

$

48.6 

 

$

6.0 

 

$

(6.3)

 

$

(4.3)

 

$

44.0 

September 30, 2014

 

$

37.4 

 

$

7.4 

 

$

(2.4)

 

$

6.2 

 

$

48.6 

The Company has a broad range of customers including many large retail outlet chains, one of which accounts for a significant percentage of its sales volume. This major customer represented 15%, 15% and 16% of the Company’s Net Sales during years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. This major customer also represented 15% and 16% of the Company’s Trade Receivables as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

We have entered into various factoring agreements and early pay programs with our customers to sell our trade receivables under non-recourse agreements in exchange for cash proceeds. A loss on sales is recognized for any discount and factoring fees associated with the transfer. We utilize factoring arrangements as an integral part of our financing for working capital. These transactions are treated as a sale and are accounted for as a reduction in trade receivables because the agreements transfer effective control over and risk related to the receivables to buyers. In some instances, we may continue to service the transferred receivable after the factoring has occurred, but in most cases we do not service any factored accounts, and any servicing of the trade receivable does not constitute significant continuing involvement or preclude the recognition of a sale. We do not carry any material servicing assets or liabilities. Cash proceeds from these arrangements are reflected as operating activities. The aggregate gross amount factored under these facilities was $2,055.0 million, $1,938.0 million and $1,575.0 million for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The cost of factoring such trade receivables was $10.1 million, $6.5 million and $9.7 million for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income as General and Administrative Expense.

88

91


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 7 - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

asset):
 September 30, 2013 September 30, 2012
 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
Total debt$(3,218,863) $(3,297,411) $(1,669,300) $(1,804,831)
Commodity swap and option agreements(86) (86) 1,993
 1,993
Foreign exchange forward agreements(8,103) (8,103) (8,721) (8,721)

(9) Income Taxes
Income tax expense was calculated based uponINVENTORY

Inventories as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 consist of the following componentsfollowing:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

Raw materials

 

$

127.5 

 

$

132.4 

Work-in-process

 

 

43.6 

 

 

37.9 

Finished goods

 

 

569.5 

 

 

610.5 



 

$

740.6 

 

$

780.8 

NOTE 8 - Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment as of (loss) income from continuing operations before income tax:September 30, 2016 and 2015 consist of the following:



 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

Land, buildings and improvements

 

$

195.8 

 

$

190.9 

Machinery, equipment and other

 

 

550.6 

 

 

491.9 

Capitalized leases

 

 

130.0 

 

 

97.3 

Construction in progress

 

 

57.7 

 

 

51.8 

Property, plant and equipment

 

$

934.1 

 

$

831.9 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(392.0)

 

 

(324.8)

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

542.1 

 

$

507.1 

NOTE 9 - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill, by segment, consists of the following:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

GBA

 

HHI

 

PET

 

H&G

 

GAC

 

Total

As of September 30, 2014

 

$

327.4 

 

$

709.8 

 

$

235.9 

 

$

196.5 

 

$

 

$

1,469.6 

AAG acquisition

 

 

38.9 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

933.2 

 

 

972.1 

European IAMS and Eukanuba acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.0 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.0 

Salix acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

71.5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

71.5 

Tell Manufacturing acquisition

 

 

 

 

7.1 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.1 

Foreign currency impact

 

 

(17.8)

 

 

(17.4)

 

 

(11.8)

 

 

 

 

(0.6)

 

 

(47.6)

As of September 30, 2015

 

 

348.5 

 

 

699.5 

 

 

299.6 

 

 

196.5 

 

 

932.6 

 

 

2,476.7 

Adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.3 

 

 

3.3 

Foreign currency impact

 

 

(3.4)

 

 

3.3 

 

 

0.2 

 

 

 

 

(1.7)

 

 

(1.6)

As of September 30, 2016

 

$

345.1 

 

$

702.8 

 

$

299.8 

 

$

196.5 

 

$

934.2 

 

$

2,478.4 
  2013 2012 2011
Pretax (loss) income:      
United States $(212,168) $(66,102) $(119,984)
Outside the United States 184,214
 175,059
 137,108
Total pretax (loss) income $(27,954) $108,957
 $17,124

The components of income tax expensecarrying value and accumulated amortization for intangible assets subject to amortization are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

(in millions)

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

Net

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

Net

Customer relationships

 

$

984.8 

 

$

(302.9)

 

$

681.9 

 

$

985.2 

 

$

(247.4)

 

$

737.8 

Technology assets

 

 

237.2 

 

 

(96.7)

 

 

140.5 

 

 

238.6 

 

 

(78.1)

 

 

160.5 

Tradenames

 

 

165.7 

 

 

(89.1)

 

 

76.6 

 

 

165.4 

 

 

(73.7)

 

 

91.7 

Total

 

$

1,387.7 

 

$

(488.7)

 

$

899.0 

 

$

1,389.2 

 

$

(399.2)

 

$

990.0 
  2013 2012 2011
Current:      
Foreign $47,740
 $38,113
 $32,649
State 1,274
 (361) 2,332
Total current $49,014
 $37,752
 $34,981
Deferred:      
Federal (23,397) 20,884
 20,247
Foreign 2,146
 5,190
 28,054
State (404) (3,441) 9,013
Total deferred $(21,655) $22,633
 $57,314
Income tax expense $27,359
 $60,385
 $92,295

Certain trade names intangible assets have an indefinite life and are not amortized. The following reconcilesbalance of trade names not subject to amortization was $1,473.5 million and $1,490.3 million as of September 30, 2016 and 2015. During the total income tax expense, basedyear ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized $4.7 million impairment on indefinite life intangible assets due to the Federal statutory income tax rate of 35%, withreduction in value over certain tradenames in response to changes in management’s strategy. There was no impairment loss on indefinite-lived trade names for the Company’s recognized income tax expense:years ended September 30, 2015 or 2014.

92


89


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Amortization expense from intangible assets for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $93.9 million, $87.8 million and $81.7 million, respectively. Excluding the impact of any future acquisitions or changes in foreign currency, the Company anticipates the annual amortization expense of intangible assets for the next five fiscal years will be as follows:



 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Amortization

2017

 

$

91.9 

2018

 

 

85.7 

2019

 

 

85.4 

2020

 

 

85.2 

2021

 

 

81.9 

NOTE 10 - (CONTINUED)DEBT

Debt as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 consists of the following:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH



 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

(in millions)

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

 

Amount

 

Rate

Term Loan, variable rate, due June 23, 2022

 

$

1,005.5 

 

3.6 

%

 

$

1,226.9 

 

3.9 

%

 

$

1,005.5 

 

3.6 

%

 

$

1,226.9 

 

3.9 

%

CAD Term Loan, variable rate, due June 23, 2022

 

 

54.9 

 

4.6 

%

 

 

55.7 

 

4.4 

%

 

 

54.9 

 

4.6 

%

 

 

55.7 

 

4.4 

%

Euro Term Loan, variable rate, due June 23, 2022

 

 

63.0 

 

3.5 

%

 

 

255.8 

 

3.5 

%

 

 

63.0 

 

3.5 

%

 

 

255.8 

 

3.5 

%

4.00% Notes, due October 1, 2026

 

 

477.0 

 

4.0 

%

 

 

 

%

 

 

477.0 

 

4.0 

%

 

 

 

%

5.75% Notes, due July 15, 2025

 

 

1,000.0 

 

5.8 

%

 

 

1,000.0 

 

5.8 

%

 

 

1,000.0 

 

5.8 

%

 

 

1,000.0 

 

5.8 

%

6.125% Notes, due December 15, 2024

 

 

250.0 

 

6.1 

%

 

 

250.0 

 

6.1 

%

 

 

250.0 

 

6.1 

%

 

 

250.0 

 

6.1 

%

6.375% Notes, due November 15, 2020

 

 

129.7 

 

6.4 

%

 

 

520.0 

 

6.4 

%

 

 

129.7 

 

6.4 

%

 

 

520.0 

 

6.4 

%

6.625% Notes, due November 15, 2022

 

 

570.0 

 

6.6 

%

 

 

570.0 

 

6.6 

%

 

 

570.0 

 

6.6 

%

 

 

570.0 

 

6.6 

%

Revolver Facility, variable rate, expiring June 23, 2020

 

 

 

%

 

 

 

%

 

 

 

%

 

 

 

%

Other notes and obligations

 

 

16.8 

 

9.8 

%

 

 

11.2 

 

10.2 

%

 

 

16.8 

 

9.8 

%

 

 

45.9 

 

4.9 

%

Obligations under capital leases

 

 

114.7 

 

5.5 

%

 

 

88.2 

 

5.7 

%

 

 

114.7 

 

5.5 

%

 

 

88.2 

 

5.7 

%

Total debt

 

 

3,681.6 

 

 

 

 

 

3,977.8 

 

 

 

 

 

3,681.6 

 

 

 

 

 

4,012.5 

 

 

 

Unamortized discount on debt

 

 

(4.5)

 

 

 

 

 

(6.8)

 

 

 

 

 

(4.5)

 

 

 

 

 

(6.8)

 

 

 

Debt issuance costs

 

 

(56.9)

 

 

 

 

 

(65.1)

 

 

 

 

 

(56.9)

 

 

 

 

 

(65.1)

 

 

 

Less current portion

 

 

(164.0)

 

 

 

 

 

(33.8)

 

 

 

 

 

(164.0)

 

 

 

 

 

(68.5)

 

 

 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

$

3,456.2 

 

 

 

 

$

3,872.1 

 

 

 

 

$

3,456.2 

 

 

 

 

$

3,872.1 

 

 

 

Debt of SB/RH also includes a loan from SBH of $34.7 million as of September 30, 2015. There was no intercompany debt owed by SB/RH as of September 30, 2016.

The Company’s aggregate scheduled maturities of debt and capital lease obligations are as follows:

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

(in millions)

 

Capital Lease Obligations

 

Debt

 

Total

 

Capital Lease Obligations

 

Debt

 

Total

2017

 

$

10.0 

 

$

154.0 

 

$

164.0 

 

$

10.0 

 

$

154.0 

 

$

164.0 

2018

 

 

9.5 

 

 

15.3 

 

 

24.8 

 

 

9.5 

 

 

15.3 

 

 

24.8 

2019

 

 

8.8 

 

 

11.4 

 

 

20.2 

 

 

8.8 

 

 

11.4 

 

 

20.2 

2020

 

 

8.5 

 

 

11.4 

 

 

19.9 

 

 

8.5 

 

 

11.4 

 

 

19.9 

2021

 

 

10.0 

 

 

11.3 

 

 

21.3 

 

 

10.0 

 

 

11.3 

 

 

21.3 

Thereafter

 

 

67.9 

 

 

3,363.5 

 

 

3,431.4 

 

 

67.9 

 

 

3,363.5 

 

 

3,431.4 

Long-term debt

 

$

114.7 

 

$

3,566.9 

 

$

3,681.6 

 

$

114.7 

 

$

3,566.9 

 

$

3,681.6 

  2013 2012 2011
Statutory federal income tax (benefit) expense $(9,784) $38,135
 $5,994
Permanent items 10,104
 8,595
 8,654
Exempt foreign income (5,921) (5,760) (380)
Foreign statutory rate vs. U.S. statutory rate (19,182) (15,211) (14,132)
State income taxes, net of federal (benefit) expense (11,686) (2,164) 1,242
Residual tax on foreign earnings (6,958) 29,844
 18,943
FURminator purchase accounting benefit 
 (14,511) 
HHI purchase accounting benefit (49,848) 
 
Valuation allowance 115,318
 26,003
 68,615
Unrecognized tax expense (benefits) 4,062
 (4,386) (2,793)
Inflationary adjustments (245) (803) (1,472)
Correction of immaterial prior period error 
 
 4,873
Nondeductible share compensation 1,669
 684
 1,953
Other, net (170) (41) 798
Income tax expense $27,359
 $60,385
 $92,295

90

93


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts

Term Loans and Revolver Facility

On June 23, 2015, SBI entered into term loan facilities pursuant to a Senior Credit Agreement consisting of (i) a $1,450 million USD Term Loan due June 23, 2022, (ii) a $75 million CAD Term Loan due June 23, 2022 and (iii) a €300 million Euro Term Loan due June 23, 2022, (collectively, “Term Loans”) and (iv) entered into a $500 million Revolver Facility due June 23, 2020 (the “Revolver”). The proceeds from the Term Loans and draws on the Revolver were used to repay SBI’s then-existing senior term credit facility, repay SBI’s outstanding 6.75% senior unsecured notes due 2020, repay and replace SBI’s then-existing asset based revolving loan facility, and to pay fees and expenses in thousands, exceptconnection with the refinancing and for general corporate purposes.

The Term Loans and Revolver are subject to variable interest rates, (i) the USD Term Loan is subject to either adjusted LIBOR (International Exchange London Interbank Offered Rate), subject to a 0.75% floor, plus 2.75% to 3.0% per share figures)


annum, or base rate plus 1.75% to 2.0% per annum, (ii) the CAD Term Loan is subject to either CDOR (Canadian Dollar Offered Rate), subject to a 0.75% floor plus 3.5% per annum, or base rate plus 2.5% per annum, (iii) the Euro Term Loan is subject to either EURIBOR (Euro Interbank Offered Rate), subject to a 0.75% floor, plus 2.75% per annum, with no base rate option available and (iv) the Revolver is subject to either adjusted LIBOR plus 2.75% to 3.0% per annum, or base rate plus 1.75% to 2.0% per annum. On October 6, 2016, subsequent to the year ended September 30, 2016, SBI amended the Term Loans reducing the interest rate. The tax effectsUSD Term Loans are subject to either adjusted LIBOR subject to 0.75% floor, plus 2.5% per annum, or base rate plus 1.5% per annum effective the date of temporary differencesthe amendment.

Subject to certain mandatory prepayment events, the Term Loans are subject to repayment according to scheduled amortizations, with the final payments of all amounts outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest, due at maturity. The Senior Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on SBI and its restricted subsidiaries’ ability to incur indebtedness, create liens, make investments, pay dividends or make certain other distributions, and merge or consolidate or sell assets, in each case subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Senior Credit Agreement. Additionally, the Senior Credit Agreement, solely with respect to the Revolver Facility, contains a financial covenant on the maximum net total leverage ratio that give riseis tested on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of September 30, 2016.

Pursuant to significanta guarantee agreement, SB/RH and the material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of SBI have guaranteed SBI’s obligations under the Senior Credit Agreement and related loan documents. Pursuant to a security agreement, SBI and such subsidiary guarantors have pledged substantially all of their respective assets to secure such obligations and, in addition, SB/RH has pledged the capital stock of SBI to secure such obligations. The Senior Credit Agreement also provides for customary events of default including payment defaults and cross-defaults to other material indebtedness.

The Term Loans were issued net of a $5.1 million discount, which is amortized with a corresponding charge to interest expense over the remaining life of the loans. The Company incurred $18.5 million of debt issuance costs of which $8.1 million was capitalized as debt issuance costs and the remainder of $10.4 million was recognized as interest expense during the year ended September 30, 2015. The Company recognized accelerated amortization of portions of the deferred tax assetsunamortized discount and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

  September 30,
  2013 2012
Current deferred tax assets:    
Employee benefits $11,372
 $16,399
Restructuring 7,085
 8,054
Inventories and receivables 24,296
 22,495
Marketing and promotional accruals 14,146
 8,270
Other 23,261
 14,440
Valuation allowance (32,342) (29,808)
Total current deferred tax assets $47,818
 $39,850
Current deferred tax liabilities:    
Inventories and receivables (2,748) (2,618)
Unrealized gains (373) (1,153)
Other (11,738) (7,936)
Total current deferred tax liabilities $(14,859) $(11,707)
Net current deferred tax assets $32,959
 $28,143
Noncurrent deferred tax assets:    
Employee benefits $35,578
 $34,927
Restructuring and purchase accounting 340
 371
Net operating loss and credit carry forwards 668,679
 572,857
Prepaid royalty 6,956
 7,006
Property, plant and equipment 9,692
 3,255
Unrealized losses 2,136
 2,521
Long-term debt 668
 3,976
Intangibles 3,917
 4,282
Other 5,268
 7,866
Valuation allowance (422,244) (354,992)
Total noncurrent deferred tax assets $310,990
 $282,069
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:    
Property, plant, and equipment (27,478) (15,337)
Unrealized gains (13,126) (15,803)
Intangibles (735,506) (596,199)
Taxes on unremitted foreign earnings (18,581) (29,231)
Other (9,073) (2,964)
Total noncurrent deferred tax liabilities $(803,764) $(659,534)
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities $(492,774) $(377,465)
Net current and noncurrent deferred tax liabilities $(459,815) $(349,322)
unamortized debt issuance costs related to the then-existing Term Loans of $7.7 million.

In Fiscal 2012,connection with the new Revolver Facility, the Company began recording residual U.S.incurred $5.7 million of fees that were capitalized as debt issuance costs and foreign taxes on foreign earnings as a result of its change in position regarding future repatriation andare being amortized over the requirements of ASC 740. To the extent necessary, the Company intends to utilize earnings of foreign subsidiaries in order to support management's plans to voluntarily accelerate pay down of U.S. debt, fund distributions to shareholders, fund U.S. acquisitions, and satisfy ongoing U.S. operational cash flow requirements. As a result, earningsremaining life of the Company's non-U.S. subsidiaries afterRevolver Facility. The Company recorded accelerated amortization of portions of the unamortized debt issuance costs related to the refinancing of the previous revolver facility totaling $1.1 million as an increase to interest expense during the year ended September 30, 2011 are generally not considered to be permanently reinvested, except in jurisdictions where repatriation is either precluded or restricted by law. The Company annually estimates the available earnings, permanent reinvestment classification, and availability and intent to use alternative


91

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

mechanisms for repatriation for each jurisdiction in which the Company does business. Accordingly, the Company is providing residual U.S. and foreign deferred taxes on these earnings to the extent they cannot be repatriated in a tax-free manner.2015. As of September 30, 2013,2016, the Company has provided residual taxeshad aggregate borrowing availability of $466.2 million, net of outstanding letters of credit of $24.6 million and a $9.2 million amount allocated to a foreign subsidiary.

94


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.00% Notes

On September 20, 2016, SBI issued €425 million aggregate principal amount of 4.00% Notes at par value, due October 1, 2026. The 4.00% Notes are guaranteed by SB/RH as well as by SBI’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries.

SBI may redeem all or a part of the 4.00% Notes, at any time on approximately $12,506or after October 1, 2021 at specified redemption prices. In addition, prior to October 1, 2021, SBI may redeem the notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of Fiscal 2013 distributionsthe principal amounts plus a “make-whole” premium. SBI is also entitled to redeem up to 35% of foreign earnings, and $45,735the aggregate principal amount of earnings not yet taxedthe notes before October 1, 2019 with an amount of cash equal to the net proceeds that SBI raises in equity offerings at specified redemption prices. Further, the indenture governing the 4.00% Notes (the “2026 Indenture”) requires SBI to make an offer, in cash, to repurchase all or a portion of the applicable outstanding notes for a specified redemption price, including a redemption premium, upon the occurrence of a change of control of SBI, as defined in the U.S. resulting2026 Indenture.

The 2026 Indenture contains customary covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends on or redemption or repurchase of equity interests, the making of certain investments, expansion into unrelated businesses, creation of liens on assets, merger or consolidation with another company, transfer or sale of all or substantially all assets, and transactions with affiliates.

In addition, the 2026 Indenture provides for customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to make payments when due or on acceleration of certain other indebtedness, and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Events of default under the 2026 Indenture arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency will automatically cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the 4.00% Notes. If any other event of default under the 2026 Indenture occurs and is continuing, the trustee for the 2026 Indenture or the registered holders of at least 25% in the then aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 4.00% Notes, may declare the acceleration of the amounts due under those notes.

The Company recorded $7.7 million of fees in connection with the offering of the 4.00% Notes during the year ended September 30, 2016, which have been capitalized as debt issuance costs and are being amortized over the remaining life of the 4.00% Notes.

5.75% Notes

On May 20, 2015, in connection with the acquisition of the AAG Business, SBI issued $1,000 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Notes at par value, due July 15, 2025 (the “5.75% Notes”). The 5.75% Notes are guaranteed by SB/RH as well as by SBI’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries.

SBI may redeem all or a part of the 5.75% Notes, at any time on or after July 15, 2020, at specified redemption prices. In addition, prior to July 15, 2020, SBI may redeem the notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a “make-whole” premium. SBI is also entitled to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes before July 15, 2018 with an amount of cash equal to the net proceeds that SBI raises in equity offerings at specified redemption prices. Further, the indenture governing the 5.75% Notes (the “2025 Indenture”) requires SBI to make an offer, in cash, to repurchase all or a portion of the applicable outstanding notes for a specified redemption price, including a redemption premium, upon the occurrence of a change of control of SBI, as defined in the 2025 Indenture.

The 2025 Indenture contains customary covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends on or redemption or repurchase of equity interests, the making of certain investments, expansion into unrelated businesses, creation of liens on assets, merger or consolidation with another company, transfer or sale of all or substantially all assets, and transactions with affiliates.

In addition, the 2025 Indenture provides for customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to make payments when due or on acceleration of certain other indebtedness, and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Events of default under the 2025 Indenture arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency will automatically cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the 5.75% Notes. If any other event of default under the 2025 Indenture occurs and is continuing, the trustee for the 2025 Indenture or the registered holders of at least 25% in the then aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 5.75% Notes, may declare the acceleration of the amounts due under those notes.

The Company recorded $19.7 million of fees in connection with the offering of the 5.75% Notes during the year ended September 30, 2015, which have been capitalized as debt issuance costs and are being amortized over the remaining life of the 5.75% Notes.

95


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6.125% Notes

On December 4, 2014, SBI issued $250 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% Notes at par value, due December 15, 2024 (the”6.125% Notes”). The 6.125% Notes are guaranteed SB/RH, as well as by SBI’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries.

SBI may redeem all or a part of the 6.125% Notes, at any time on or after December 15, 2019, at specified redemption prices. Prior to December 15, 2019, SBI may redeem the notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a “make-whole” premium. SBI is also entitled to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes before December 15, 2017 with an amount of cash equal to the net proceeds that SBI raises in equity offerings at specified redemption prices. Further, the indenture governing the 6.125% Notes (the “2024 Indenture”) requires SBI to make an offer, in cash, to repurchase all or a portion of the applicable outstanding notes for a specified redemption price, including a redemption premium, upon the occurrence of a change of control of SBI, as defined in the 2024 Indenture.

The 2024 Indenture contains customary covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends on or redemption or repurchase of equity interests, the making of certain investments, expansion into unrelated businesses, creation of liens on assets, merger or consolidation with another company, transfer or sale of all or substantially all assets, and transactions with affiliates.

In addition, the 2024 Indenture provides for customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to make payments when due or on acceleration of certain other indebtedness, and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Events of default under the 2024 Indenture arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency will automatically cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the 6.125% Notes. If any other event of default under the 2024 Indenture occurs and is continuing, the trustee for the 2024 Indenture or the registered holders of at least 25% in the then aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 6.125% Notes, may declare the acceleration of the amounts due under those notes.

The Company recorded $4.6 million of fees in connection with the offering of the 6.125% Notes, which have been capitalized as debt issuance costs and are being amortized over the remaining life of the 6.125% Notes.

6.375% Notes and 6.625% Notes

On December 17, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of HHI Business, the Company assumed $520 million aggregate principal amount of 6.375% Notes at par value, due November 15, 2020 (the “6.375% Notes”), and $570 million aggregate principal amount of 6.625% Notes at par value, due November 15, 2022 (the “6.625% Notes”). The 6.375% Notes and 6.625% Notes are unsecured and guaranteed by SB/RH, as well as by existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries.

The Company may redeem all or a part of the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes, upon not less than 30 or more than 60 days notice, at specified redemption prices. Further, the indenture governing the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes (the “2020/22 Indenture”) requires the Company to make an offer, in cash, to repurchase all or a portion of the applicable outstanding notes for a specified redemption price, including a redemption premium, upon the occurrence of a change of control of the Company, as defined in such indenture.

The 2020/22 Indenture contains customary covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends on or redemption or repurchase of equity interests, the making of certain investments, expansion into unrelated businesses, creation of liens on assets, merger or consolidation with another company, transfer or sale of all or substantially all assets, and transactions with affiliates.

In addition, the 2020/22 Indenture provides for customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to make payments when due or on acceleration of certain other indebtedness, and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Events of default under the 2020/22 Indenture arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency will automatically cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes. If any other event of default under the 2020/22 Indenture occurs and is continuing, the trustee for the 2020/22 Indenture or the registered holders of at least 25% in the then aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 6.375% Notes, or the 6.625% Notes, may declare the acceleration of the amounts due under those notes.

96


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company recorded $12.9 million and $14.1 million of fees in connection with the offering of the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes, which were capitalized as debt issuance costs and amortized over the remaining lives of the 6.375% Notes and 6.625% Notes, respectively. In connection with the issuance of the 4.00% Notes previously discussed, the Company repurchased $390.3 million aggregate principal amount of the 6.375% Notes in a cash tender offer. In connection with the tender, the Company recognized $6.5 million of fees and expenses and a $15.6 million tender premium as interest expense; and wrote off $5.8 million of previously capitalized debt issuance costs as a non-cash charge to interest expense during the year ended September 30, 2016. Pursuant to the 2020/22 Indenture, the remaining outstanding aggregate principal of $129.7 million was subsequently redeemed on October 20, 2016 with a make whole premium of $4.6 million charged to interest expense subsequent to the year ended September 30, 2016.  

NOTE 11 - LEASES

The Company has leases primarily pertaining to land, buildings and equipment that expire at various times through December 2031. The Company’s minimum rent payments under operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:



 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Amount

2017

 

$

42.3 

2018

 

 

32.7 

2019

 

 

23.4 

2020

 

 

18.0 

2021

 

 

12.3 

Thereafter

 

 

18.4 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

147.1 

Rent expense was $46.8 million, $36.3 million and $40.8 million for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

NOTE 12 - DERIVATIVES

Derivative financial instruments are used by the Company principally in the management of its interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate and raw material price exposures. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the effective portion of the derivative is reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on derivatives representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest Rate Swaps. Fiscal 2013 increaseThe Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges with the changes in tax expense, net offair value recorded in AOCI and as a correspondingderivative asset or liability, as applicable. The swaps settle periodically in arrears with the related amounts for the current settlement period payable to, or receivable from, the counter-parties included in accrued liabilities or receivables, respectively, and recognized in earnings as an adjustment to Interest Expense from the Company's domestic valuation allowance, of approximately $109.underlying debt to which the swap is designated. As of September 30, 2012,2016 and 2015, the Company recorded residualhad a series of U.S. and foreign taxesdollar denominated interest rate swaps outstanding which effectively fix the interest on approximately $21,163variable rate debt, exclusive of Fiscal 2012 distributions and $76,475lender spreads, at 1.36% for a notional principal amount of $300.0 million through April 2017. The derivative net losses estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings not yet taxed inover the U.S., resulting in a Fiscal 2012 increase in tax expense,next 12 months is $0.7 million, net of tax. The Company’s interest rate swap derivative financial instruments at September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

(in millions)

 

Notional Amount

 

Remaining Years

 

Notional Amount

 

Remaining Years

Interest rate swaps - fixed

 

$

300.0 

 

 

0.5 

 

$

300.0 

 

 

1.5 

97


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Commodity Swaps. The Company is exposed to risk from fluctuating prices for raw materials, specifically zinc and brass used in its manufacturing processes. The Company hedges a correspondingportion of the risk associated with the purchase of these materials through the use of commodity swaps. The hedge contracts are designated as cash flow hedges with the fair value changes recorded in AOCI and as a hedge asset or liability, as applicable. The unrecognized changes in fair value of the hedge contracts are reclassified from AOCI into earnings when the hedged purchase of raw materials also affects earnings. The swaps effectively fix the floating price on a specified quantity of raw materials through a specified date. At September 30, 2016, the Company had a series of zinc and brass swap contracts outstanding through December 2017. The derivative net gains estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months is $1.9 million, net of tax. The Company had the following commodity swap contracts outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and 2015:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

(in millions, except notional)

 

Notional

 

Contract Value

 

Notional

 

Contract Value

Zinc swap contracts

 

 

6.7 Tons

 

$

12.8 

 

 

10.8 Tons

 

$

22.2 

Brass swap contracts

 

 

1.0 Tons

 

$

4.0 

 

 

1.8 Tons

 

$

8.5 

Foreign exchange contracts. The Company periodically enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the risk from forecasted foreign currency denominated third party and intercompany sales or payments. These obligations generally require the Company to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. Dollars, Euros, Pounds Sterling, Australian Dollars, Canadian Dollars or Japanese Yen. These foreign exchange contracts are cash flow hedges of fluctuating foreign exchange rates related to sales of product or raw material purchases. Until the sale or purchase is recognized, the fair value of the related hedge is recorded in AOCI and as a hedge asset or liability, as applicable. At the time the sale or purchase is recognized, the fair value of the related hedge is reclassified as an adjustment to Net Sales or purchase price variance in Cost of Goods Sold on the Company's domestic valuation allowance,Condensed Consolidated Statements of approximately Income. At September 30, 2016, the Company had a series of foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding through December 2017. The derivative net gains estimated to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months is $3.3 million, net of tax. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had foreign exchange derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges with a notional value of $224.8 million and $300.6 million, respectively.$3,278.

Net Investment Hedge

On September 20, 2016, SBI issued €425 million aggregate principal amount of 4.00% Notes. See Note 10, “Debt” for further detail. The 4.00% Notes are denominated in Euros and have been designated as a net investment hedge of the translation of the Company’s net investments in Euro denominated subsidiaries at the time of issuance. As a result, the translation of the Euro denominated debt is recognized as AOCI with any ineffective portion recognized as foreign currency translation gains or losses on the statement of income when the aggregate principal exceeds the net investment in its Euro denominated subsidiaries. Net gains or losses from the net investment hedge are reclassified from AOCI into earnings upon a liquidation event or deconsolidation of Euro denominated subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2011,2016, the hedge was fully effective and no ineffective portion was recognized in earnings.

Derivative Contracts Not Designated As Hedges for Accounting Purposes

Foreign exchange contracts. The Company periodically enters into forward and swap foreign exchange contracts to economically hedge the risk from third party and intercompany payments resulting from existing obligations. These obligations generally require the Company recorded residualto exchange foreign currencies for U.S. andDollars, Canadian Dollars, Euros, Pounds Sterling, Taiwanese Dollars, Hong Kong Dollars or Australian Dollars. These foreign taxes on approximately $39,391 of actual and deemed distributions of foreign earnings resulting in a Fiscal 2011 increase in tax expense, netexchange contracts are economic hedges of a corresponding adjustmentrelated liability or asset recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The gain or loss on the derivative hedge contracts is recorded in earnings as an offset to the Company's domestic valuation allowance, of approximately $771. Fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 distributions were primarily non-cash deemed distributions under U.S. tax law.

Remaining undistributed earningschange in value of the Company’s foreign operations are approximately $409,589related liability or asset at each period end. At September 30, 2016, the Company had a series of forward exchange contracts outstanding through October 2016. At September 30, 20132016, and are intended to remain permanently invested. Accordingly, no residual income taxes have been provided on those earnings at September 30, 2013. If at some future date these earnings cease to be permanently invested, the Company may be subject to U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding and other taxes on such amounts, which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
As of September 30, 20132015, the Company has U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,515,344had $131.4 million and $1,551,341126.8 million, respectively. These net operating loss carryforwards expire through years endingrespectively, of notional value for such foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding.

98


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Commodity Swaps. The Company periodically enters into commodity swap contracts to economically hedge the risk from fluctuating prices for raw materials, specifically the pass-through of market prices for silver used in 2033. As of September 30, 2013 themanufacturing purchased watch batteries. The Company has foreign loss carryforwards of approximately $111,186 which will expire beginning in the Company's fiscal year ending 2014. Certainhedges a portion of the foreign net operating losses have indefinite carryforward periods. The Company is subject to an annual limitation onrisk associated with these materials through the use of its net operatingcommodity swaps. The swap contracts are designated as economic hedges with the unrealized gain or loss recorded in earnings and as an asset or liability at each period end. The unrecognized changes in fair value of the hedge contracts are adjusted through earnings when the realized gains or losses that arose prior to its emergence from bankruptcy.affect earnings upon settlement of the hedges. The swaps effectively fix the floating price on a specified quantity of silver through a specified date. At September 30, 2016, the Company had a series of commodity swaps outstanding through August 2017. The Company has had multiple changesthe following outstanding commodity swap contracts outstanding as of ownership, as defined under Section 382September 30, 2016 and 2015:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2016

 

2015

(in millions, except notional)

 

Notional

 

Contract Value

 

Notional

 

Contract Value

Silver

 

 

31.0 troy oz.

 

$

0.6 

 

 

25.0 troy oz.

 

$

0.4 

Fair Value of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that subject the Company’s U.S. federal and state net operating losses and other tax attributes to certain limitations. Derivative Instruments

The annual limitation is based on a number of factors including thefair value of the Company’s stock (as defined for tax purposes), on the date of the ownership change, its net unrealized built in gain position on that date, the occurrence of realized built in gains in years subsequent to the ownership change, and the effects of subsequent ownership changes (as defined for tax purposes), if any. Due to these limitations, the Company estimates, as of September 30, 2013, that $301,202 of the total U.S. federal and $357,938 of the state net operating loss will expire unused even if the Company generates sufficient income to otherwise use all of its NOLs. In addition, separate return year limitations apply to limit the Company’s utilization of the acquired Russell Hobbs U.S. federal and state net operating losses to future income of the Russell Hobbs subgroup. The Company also projects, as of September 30, 2013, that $102,576 of the total foreign loss carryforwards will expire unused. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets.

A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the ability of the Company to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate characteroutstanding derivative instruments in the future and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions. As of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company’s valuation allowance, established for the tax benefit that may not be realized, totaled approximately $454,586 and $384,800, respectively. As of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, approximately $421,743 and $349,316, respectively, related to U.S. net deferred tax assets, and approximately $32,843 and $35,484, respectively, related to foreign net deferred tax assets. The net increase in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets during Fiscal 2013 totaled approximately $69,786, of which approximately $72,427 related to an increase in the valuation allowance against U.S. net deferred tax assets, and approximately $2,641 related to a decrease in the valuation allowance against foreign net deferred tax assets. As a result of the purchase of HHI, the Company reversed $49,848 of U.S. valuation allowance during Fiscal 2013. The reversal was attributable to $49,848 of net deferred tax liabilities recorded on the HHI acquisition date balance sheet that offset other U.S. net deferred tax assets. As a result of the purchase of FURminator, the Company reversed $14,511 of U.S. valuation allowance during Fiscal 2012. The reversal was attributable to $14,511 of net deferred tax liabilities recorded on the FURminator acquisition date balance sheet that offset other U.S. net deferred tax assets. During Fiscal 2011, the Company determined that a valuation allowance was required against deferred tax assets related to net operating losses in Brazil, and thus recorded a $25,877 increase in the valuation allowance.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Line Item

 

2016

 

2015

Derivative Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity swaps - designated as hedge

 

Receivables—Other

 

$

2.9 

 

$

Commodity swaps - designated as hedge

 

Deferred charges and other

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts - designated as hedge

 

Receivables—Other

 

 

5.5 

 

$

5.2 

Foreign exchange contracts - designated as hedge

 

Deferred charges and other

 

 

0.1 

 

 

0.4 

Foreign exchange contracts - not designated as hedge

 

Receivables—Other

 

 

0.2 

 

 

0.4 

Total Derivative Assets

 

 

 

$

8.7 

 

$

6.0 

Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps - designated as hedge

 

Other current liabilities

 

$

0.7 

 

$

1.4 

Interest rate swaps - designated as hedge

 

Accrued interest

 

 

0.4 

 

 

0.4 

Interest rate swaps - designated as hedge

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

 

 

0.8 

Commodity swaps - designated as hedge

 

Accounts payable

 

 

0.1 

 

 

4.7 

Commodity swaps - designated as hedge

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

 

 

0.8 

Commodity swaps - not designated as hedge

 

Accounts payable

 

 

 

 

0.1 

Foreign exchange contracts - designated as hedge

 

Accounts payable

 

 

1.7 

 

 

1.5 

Foreign exchange contracts - designated as hedge

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

0.1 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts - not designated as hedge

 

Accounts payable

 

 

0.2 

 

 

0.1 

Total Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 

$

3.2 

 

$

9.8 

The Company is exposed to the risk of default by the counterparties with which it transacts and generally does not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to credit risk. The Company monitors counterparty credit risk on an individual basis by periodically assessing each such counterparty’s credit rating exposure. The maximum loss due to credit risk equals the fair value of the gross asset derivatives that are concentrated with certain domestic and foreign financial institution counterparties. The Company considers these exposures when measuring its credit reserve on its derivative assets, which was less than $0.1 million for the years ended September 30, 20132016 and September 30, 2012 are $13,807 and $5,877, respectively. If recognized in the future, $10,115 of unrecognized tax benefits will affect the effective tax rate, and $3,692 of unrecognized tax benefits would create deferred tax assets against which2015.

The Company’s standard contracts do not contain credit risk related contingent features whereby the Company would havebe required to post additional cash collateral as a full valuation allowance.result of a credit event. However, the Company is typically required to post collateral in the normal course of business to offset its liability positions. As of September 30, 2015, there was $3.5 million of posted cash collateral related to such liability positions. As of September 30, 2016, there was no cash collateral outstanding. In addition, as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had no posted standby letters of credit related to such liability positions. The Company recognizes interest and penaltiescash collateral is included in Other Receivables within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

99


92


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 the Company had approximately $3,671 and $3,564, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The impact related to interest and penalties on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2013 was a net increase to Income tax expense of $8. The impact related to interest and penalties on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2012 was a net decrease to Income tax expense of $1,184. The impact related to interest and penalties on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2011 was a net decrease to Income tax expense of $1,422.
As of September 30, 2013, certain of the Company’s legal entities are undergoing income tax audits. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the examinations; however, it is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months some portion of previously unrecognized tax benefits could be recognized.

The following table summarizes the changes toimpact of the amounteffective and ineffective portions of unrecognized tax benefits for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012,designated hedges and Fiscal 2011:

Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2010$12,808
Gross increase – tax positions in prior period1,658
Gross decrease – tax positions in prior period(823)
Gross increase – tax positions in current period596
Settlements(1,850)
Lapse of statutes of limitations(3,376)
  
Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2011$9,013
Gross increase – tax positions in prior period773
Gross decrease – tax positions in prior period(1,308)
Gross increase – tax positions in current period776
Settlements(1,737)
Lapse of statutes of limitations(1,640)
  
Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2012$5,877
Gross increase – tax positions in prior period9,104
Gross decrease – tax positions in prior period(327)
Gross increase – tax positions in current period516
Settlements(15)
Lapse of statutes of limitations(1,348)
  
Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2013$13,807
  
The Company files income tax returnsthe gain (loss) recognized in the U.S. federal jurisdictionConsolidated Statement of Income for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions and is subject2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Effective Portion

 

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Reclassified to Earnings

 

Ineffective portion

September 30, 2016 (in millions)

 

in OCI

 

Line Item

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Line Item

 

Gain (Loss)

Interest rate swaps

 

$

(0.4)

 

Interest expense

 

$

(1.9)

 

Interest expense

 

$

Commodity swaps

 

 

4.5 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

(3.7)

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

Net investment hedge

 

 

0.6 

 

Other non-operating expense

 

 

 

Other non-operating expense

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

(0.4)

 

Net sales

 

 

(0.2)

 

Net sales

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

6.8 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

6.9 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

Total

 

$

11.1 

 

 

 

$

1.1 

 

 

 

$



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Effective Portion

 

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Reclassified to Earnings

 

Ineffective portion

September 30, 2015 (in millions)

 

in OCI

 

Line Item

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Line Item

 

Gain (Loss)

Interest rate swaps

 

$

(3.4)

 

Interest expense

 

$

(1.9)

 

Interest expense

 

$

Commodity swaps

 

 

(7.2)

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

(0.7)

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

0.1 

 

Net sales

 

 

0.1 

 

Net sales

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

21.8 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

30.0 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

Total

 

$

11.3 

 

 

 

$

27.5 

 

 

 

$



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Effective Portion

 

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Reclassified to Earnings

 

Ineffective portion

September 30, 2014 (in millions)

 

in OCI

 

Line Item

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Line Item

 

Gain (Loss)

Interest rate swaps

 

$

(1.6)

 

Interest expense

 

$

(0.9)

 

Interest expense

 

$

Commodity swaps

 

 

1.9 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

0.8 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

0.1 

 

Net sales

 

 

0.2 

 

Net sales

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

12.7 

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

(2.6)

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

Total

 

$

13.1 

 

 

 

$

(2.5)

 

 

 

$



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The unrealized loss on derivative contracts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss expected to ongoing examination bybe recognized during the various taxing authorities. The Company’s major taxing jurisdictions are the U.S., United Kingdom, and Germany. In the U.S., federal tax filings for years prior to and including the Company’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 are closed. However,2017 is $5.9 million.

The following table summarizes the federal net operating loss carryforwards fromgain (loss) associated with derivative contracts not designated as hedges in the Company’s fiscalConsolidated Statements of Income for the years ended September 30, 20092016, 2015 and prior are subject to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination until the year that such net operating loss carryforwards are utilized and those years are closed for audit. The Company’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 remain open to examination by the IRS. Filings in various U.S. state and local jurisdictions are also subject to audit and to date no significant audit matters have arisen.2014.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Line Item

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Commodity swaps

 

Cost of goods sold

 

$

 

$

(0.1)

 

$

(0.1)

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Other non-operating expenses, net

 

 

3.1 

 

 

(2.5)

 

 

3.1 

Total

 

 

 

$

3.1 

 

$

(2.6)

 

$

3.0 

In the U.S., Russell Hobbs federal tax filings for years prior to and including the year ended June 30, 2009 are closed. However, the federal net operating loss carryforwards for Russell Hobbs' fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and prior are subject to examination by the IRS until the year that such net operating losses are utilized and those years are closed for audit.

During Fiscal 2011 we recorded the correction of an immaterial prior period error in our consolidated financial statements related to the effective state income tax rates for certain U.S. subsidiaries. We believe the correction of this error to be both quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial to our annual results for Fiscal 2011 or to the financial statements of any previous period. The impact of the corrections was an increase to income tax expense and an increase to deferred tax liabilities in Fiscal 2011 of approximately 100$4,873.


93


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13(CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)


(10) Employee Benefit Plans
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Pension Benefits

The Company has various defined benefit pension plans covering some of its employees in the United States and certain employees in other countries, primarily the United Kingdom and Germany. Plans generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The Company funds its U.S. pension plans in accordance with the requirements of the defined benefit pension plans and, where applicable, in amounts sufficient to satisfy the minimum funding requirements of applicable laws. Additionally, in compliance with the Company’s funding policy, annual contributions to non-U.S. defined benefit plans are equal to the actuarial recommendations or statutory requirements in the respective countries.

The Company also sponsors or participates in a number of other non-U.S. pension arrangements, including various retirement and termination benefit plans, some of which are covered by local law or coordinated with government-sponsored plans, which are not significant in the aggregate and therefore are not included in the information presented below. The Company also has various nonqualified deferred compensation agreements with certain of its employees. Under certain of these agreements, the Company has agreed to pay certain amounts annually for the first 15 years subsequent to retirement or to a designated beneficiary upon death. It is management’s intent that life insurance contracts owned by the Company will fund these agreements. Under the remaining agreements, the Company has agreed to pay such deferred amounts in up to 15 annual installments beginning on a date specified by the employee, subsequent to retirement or disability, or to a designated beneficiary upon death.
Other Benefits
Under the Rayovac postretirement plan, the Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retired employees. Participants earn retiree health care benefits after reaching age 40 over the next 10 succeeding years of service, and remain eligible until reaching age 65. The plan is contributory; retiree contributions have been established as a flat dollar amount with contribution rates expected to increase at the active medical trend rate. The plan is unfunded. The Company is amortizing the transition obligation over a 20-year period.

The following tables provide additional information on the Company’s pension plans as of September 30, 2016 and other postretirement benefit plans:2015: 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

U.S. Plans

 

Non U.S. Plans

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

Changes in benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit obligation, beginning of year

 

$

73.9 

 

$

70.9 

 

$

184.4 

 

$

196.2 

Obligations assumed from acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6 

Transfer of obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.8)

Service cost

 

 

0.2 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

2.6 

 

 

2.6 

Interest cost

 

 

3.0 

 

 

2.9 

 

 

5.7 

 

 

6.2 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

6.2 

 

 

3.3 

 

 

36.0 

 

 

10.6 

Curtailments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.9)

Benefits paid

 

 

(3.8)

 

 

(3.6)

 

 

(6.1)

 

 

(11.8)

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12.0)

 

 

(17.3)

Benefit obligation, end of year

 

$

79.5 

 

$

73.9 

 

$

210.6 

 

$

184.4 

Changes in plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year

 

$

58.2 

 

$

62.4 

 

$

116.9 

 

$

126.5 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

5.3 

 

 

(1.2)

 

 

8.9 

 

 

3.6 

Employer contributions

 

 

4.1 

 

 

0.6 

 

 

6.6 

 

 

7.8 

Benefits paid

 

 

(3.8)

 

 

(3.6)

 

 

(6.1)

 

 

(11.8)

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11.3)

 

 

(9.2)

Fair value of plan assets, end of year

 

$

63.8 

 

$

58.2 

 

$

115.0 

 

$

116.9 

Funded Status

 

$

(15.7)

 

$

(15.7)

 

$

(95.6)

 

$

(67.5)

Amounts recognized in statement of financial position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other accrued expenses

 

$

0.5 

 

$

0.6 

 

$

2.3 

 

$

2.2 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

15.2 

 

 

15.1 

 

 

93.3 

 

 

65.3 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(20.0)

 

 

(20.4)

 

 

(64.2)

 

 

(23.4)

Weighted average assumptions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

 

3.50%

 

 

4.25%

 

 

1.00 - 13.50%

 

 

1.75 - 13.81%

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

7.00%

 

 

7.25%

 

 

1.00 - 3.70%

 

 

3.50 - 5.26%

Rate of compensation increase

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

2.25 - 7.00%

 

 

2.25 - 5.50%


94

101


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(

Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)


    
Pension and Deferred
Compensation Benefits
 Other Benefits
  2013 2012 2013 2012
Change in benefit obligation            
Benefit obligation, beginning of year $240,806  $209,472  $566
 $542
Liabilities assumed through acquisitions 14,716       
Service cost 3,061  2,048  9
 12
Interest cost 9,886  10,593  22
 27
Actuarial loss (gain) 1,851  29,834  (58) (14)
Participant contributions 59  182  
 
Curtailments (1,507)   (135) 
Benefits paid (15,925) (9,354) (1) (1)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes 3,195  (1,969) 
 
Benefit obligation, end of year $256,142  $240,806  $403
 $566
Change in plan assets            
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year $153,927  $130,641  $
 $
Assets acquired through acquisitions 6,680    
 
Actual return on plan assets 16,759  20,112  
 
Employer contributions 12,316  12,587  1
 1
Employee contributions 59  182  
 
Benefits paid (15,925) (9,354) (1) (1)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes 1,668  (241) 
 
Fair value of plan assets, end of year $175,484  $153,927  $
 $
Accrued Benefit Cost $(80,658) $(86,879) $(403) $(566)
Range of assumptions:            
Discount rate 1.8%-13.0% 4.0%-13.5% 4.7% 4.0%
Expected return on plan assets 3.6%-7.8% 4.0%-7.8% N/A
 N/A
Rate of compensation increase 2.3%-5.5% 2.3%-5.5% N/A
 N/A
The net underfunded status as of September 30, 2013reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss associated with employee benefit plan costs and September 30, 2012 of $80,658 and $86,879, respectively, is recognized inon the accompanyingCompany’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Position within Employee benefit obligations, net of current portion. Included inIncome for the Company’s AOCI as of years ended September 30, 20132016, 2015 and September 30, 2012 are unrecognized net losses of $29,180, net of tax expense of $817 and $33,428, net of tax benefit of $4,392, respectively, which have not yet been recognized2014 were as components of net periodic pension cost. follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Cost of goods sold

 

$

1.4 

 

$

0.6 

 

$

0.6 

Selling expenses

 

 

0.3 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

0.3 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

0.7 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

0.5 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

2.4 

 

$

1.4 

 

$

1.4 

The net loss in AOCIAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss expected to be recognized during Fiscal 2014 is $1,549.

At the year ended September 30, 2013,2017 is $5.3 million.

The following table contains the Company’s total pension and deferred compensationcomponents of net periodic benefit obligation of $256,142 consisted of $66,895 associated with U.S. plans and $189,247 associated with international plans. The fair value of the Company’s pension and deferred compensation benefit assets of $175,484 consisted of $58,458 associated with U.S. plans and $117,026 associated with international plans. The weighted average discount rate usedcost for the Company’s domestic plans was approximately 3.8% and approximately 3.9% for its international plans. The weighted average expected return on plan assets used for the Company’s domestic plans was approximately 7.8% and approximately 4.7% for its international plans.

Atyears ended September 30, 2012, the Company’s total pension2016, 2015 and deferred compensation benefit obligation of $240,806 consisted of $75,580 associated with U.S. plans and $165,226 associated with international plans. The fair value of the Company’s pension and deferred compensation benefit assets of $153,927 consisted of $51,721 associated with U.S. plans and $102,206 associated with international plans. The weighted average discount rate used for the Company’s domestic plans was approximately 4.3% and approximately 5.3% for its international plans. The weighted average expected return on plan assets used for the Company’s domestic plans was approximately 7.8% and approximately 5.4% for its international plans.2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

U.S. Plans

 

Non U.S. Plans

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Service cost

 

$

0.2 

 

$

0.4 

 

$

0.2 

 

$

2.6 

 

$

2.6 

 

$

3.0 

Interest cost

 

 

3.0 

 

 

2.9 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

5.7 

 

 

6.2 

 

 

7.4 

Expected return on assets

 

 

(4.3)

 

 

(4.5)

 

 

(4.1)

 

 

(4.2)

 

 

(5.2)

 

 

(5.8)

Curtailment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

0.7 

 

 

(0.1)

Recognized net actuarial loss

 

 

0.6 

 

 

0.2 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

0.8 

 

 

1.3 

 

 

1.4 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

(0.5)

 

$

(1.0)

 

$

(0.8)

 

$

5.0 

 

$

5.6 

 

$

5.9 

Weighted average assumptions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

4.25%

 

4.15%

 

4.65%

 

1.75 - 13.81%

 

2.00 - 13.50%

 

2.25 - 12.50%

Expected return on plan assets

 

7.25%

 

7.50%

 

7.75%

 

1.75 - 4.53%

 

2.00 - 5.26%

 

4.00 - 5.76%

Rate of compensation increase

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

2.25 - 5.50%

 

2.25 - 5.50%

 

2.25 - 5.50%


95

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

  
Pension and Deferred
Compensation Benefits
 Other Benefits
  2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011
Components of net periodic benefit cost            
Service cost $3,061
 $2,048
 $2,543
  $9
 $12
 $11
Interest cost 9,886
 10,593
 10,380
  22
 27
 27
Expected return on assets (8,667) (8,225) (7,829) 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost 
 72
 
  
 
 
Curtailment gain (752) 
 
 
 
 
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss 2,112
 828
 8
  8
 (54) (52)
Net periodic cost (benefit) $5,640
 $5,316
 $5,102
  $39
 $(15) $(14)

The discount rate is used to calculate the projected benefit obligation. The discount rate used is based on the rate of return on government bonds as well as current market conditions of the respective countries where suchthe plans are established.

Below is a summary allocation of all pension The expected return on plan assets asis based on the Company’s expectation of the measurement date.
  
Weighted Average
Allocation
  Target Actual
Asset Category 2013 2013 2012
Equity Securities 0-60% 47% 49%
Fixed Income Securities 0-40% 21% 20%
Other 0-100% 32% 31%
Total 100% 100% 100%
The weightedlong-term average expected long-term rate of return on total assets is 5.7%.
of the capital market in which the plans invest. The expected return reflects the target asset allocations and considers the historical returns earned for each asset category.

The Company has established formal investment policies for the assets associated with these plans. Policy objectives include maximizing long-term return at acceptable risk levels, diversifying among asset classes, if appropriate, and among investment managers, as well as establishing relevant risk parameters within each asset class. Specific asset class targets are based on the results of periodic asset/liability studies. The investment policies permit variances from the targets within certain parameters. The weighted average expected long-term rate of return is based on a Fiscal 2013 review of such rates. The plan assets currently do not include holdings of SB Holdingsthe Company’s common stock.

The following table sets forth the fair value

Below is a summary allocation of the Company’sall pension plan assets as of September 30, 2013 segregated by level within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 8, "Fair Value of Financial Instruments", for discussion of the fair value hierarchy2016 and fair value principles:2015:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

US Plans

 

Non U.S. Plans

Asset Type

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

Equity Securities

 

62 

%

 

63 

%

 

%

 

%

Fixed Income Securities

 

35 

%

 

35 

%

 

23 

%

 

25 

%

Other

 

%

 

%

 

77 

%

 

69 

%

Total

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
U.S. Defined Benefit Plan Assets:        
Common collective trust—equity $32,772
 $9,393
 $
 $42,165
Common collective trust—fixed income 
 16,293
 
 16,293
Total U.S. Defined Benefit Plan Assets $32,772
 $25,686
 $
 $58,458
International Defined Benefit Plan Assets:        
Common collective trust—equity $
 $46,521
 $
 $46,521
Common collective trust—fixed income 
 15,868
 
 15,868
Insurance contracts—general fund 
 37,690
 
 37,690
Other 6,658
 10,289
 
 16,947
Total International Defined Benefit Plan Assets $6,658
 $110,368
 $
 $117,026


96

102


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)


The following table sets forth the fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets by asset category as of September 30, 2012 segregated by2016 and 2015 are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of September 30, 2016 (in millions)

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

Equity Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. equity securities

 

$

22.2 

 

$

6.3 

 

$

 

$

28.5 

Foreign equity securities

 

 

10.4 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4 

Debt Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. bonds

 

 

19.6 

 

 

1.7 

 

 

 

 

21.3 

Foreign bonds

 

 

1.9 

 

 

24.1 

 

 

 

 

26.0 

Real estate

 

 

1.7 

 

 

5.8 

 

 

 

 

7.5 

Life insurance contracts

 

 

 

 

37.0 

 

 

 

 

37.0 

Other

 

 

 

 

34.4 

 

 

 

 

34.4 

Foreign cash & cash equivalents

 

 

13.7 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.7 

Total plan assets

 

$

69.5 

 

$

109.3 

 

$

 

$

178.8 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of September 30, 2015 (in millions)

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

Equity Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. equity securities

 

$

18.6 

 

$

7.1 

 

$

 

$

25.7 

Foreign equity securities

 

 

10.5 

 

 

6.2 

 

 

 

 

16.7 

Debt Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. bonds

 

 

18.2 

 

 

1.3 

 

 

 

 

19.5 

Foreign bonds

 

 

3.0 

 

 

15.1 

 

 

 

 

18.1 

Foreign government bonds

 

 

 

 

11.2 

 

 

 

 

11.2 

Real estate

 

 

1.2 

 

 

6.0 

 

 

 

 

7.2 

Life insurance contracts

 

 

 

 

35.5 

 

 

 

 

35.5 

Other

 

 

 

 

33.1 

 

 

 

 

33.1 

Foreign cash & cash equivalents

 

 

8.1 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.1 

Total plan assets

 

$

59.6 

 

$

115.5 

 

$

 

$

175.1 
level within the fair value hierarchy.
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
U.S. Defined Benefit Plan Assets:        
Common collective trust—equity $20,520
 $16,667
 $
 $37,187
Common collective trust—fixed income 
 14,534
 
 14,534
Total U.S. Defined Benefit Plan Assets $20,520
 $31,201
 $
 $51,721
International Defined Benefit Plan Assets:        
Common collective trust—equity $
 $38,507
 $
 $38,507
Common collective trust—fixed income 
 15,661
 
 15,661
Insurance contracts—general fund 
 40,651
 
 40,651
Other 
 7,387
 
 7,387
Total International Defined Benefit Plan Assets $
 $102,206
 $
 $102,206

The Company’s Fixed Income Securities portfolio is invested primarily in commingled funds and managed for overall return expectations rather than matching duration against plan liabilities; therefore, debt maturities are not significant to the plan performance.

The Company’s Other portfolio consists of all pension assets, primarily insurance contracts, in the United Kingdom and Germany.
The Company’s expected future pensionfollowing benefit payments for Fiscal 2014 through its fiscal year 2023 are as follows:expected to be paid:



 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

US Plans

 

Non U.S. Plans

2017

 

$

3.7 

 

$

5.4 

2018

 

 

3.8 

 

 

5.7 

2019

 

 

4.0 

 

 

6.4 

2020

 

 

4.1 

 

 

6.8 

2021

 

 

4.2 

 

 

7.0 

2022-2026

 

 

21.2 

 

 

40.0 
  
2014$9,241
20158,536
201610,135
201710,376
201810,924
2019-202362,547

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors a defined contribution pension plan for its domestic salaried employees, which allows participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company also sponsors defined contribution pension plans for employees of certain foreign subsidiaries. Company contributions charged to operations, including discretionary amounts, for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and Fiscal 20112014 were $11,095, $1,935$11.8 million, $11.2 million, and $4,999, respectively.$12.3 million.

103



Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 14 - INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was calculated based upon the following components of income (loss) from operations before income taxes for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

United States

 

$

197.8 

 

$

3.4 

 

$

80.7 

 

$

203.5 

 

$

9.8 

 

$

83.3 

Outside the United States

 

 

199.8 

 

 

189.9 

 

 

192.8 

 

 

199.8 

 

 

189.9 

 

 

192.8 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

$

397.6 

 

$

193.3 

 

$

273.5 

 

$

403.3 

 

$

199.7 

 

$

276.1 

The components of income tax expense for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Current tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

$

1.6 

 

$

3.6 

 

$

6.2 

 

$

1.6 

 

$

3.6 

 

$

6.2 

Foreign

 

 

59.7 

 

 

40.4 

 

 

46.6 

 

 

59.7 

 

 

40.4 

 

 

46.6 

State and local

 

 

4.2 

 

 

4.5 

 

 

4.3 

 

 

4.2 

 

 

4.5 

 

 

4.3 

Total current tax expense

 

 

65.5 

 

 

48.5 

 

 

57.1 

 

 

65.5 

 

 

48.5 

 

 

57.1 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

 

(27.2)

 

 

(12.3)

 

 

19.7 

 

 

(16.7)

 

 

(12.3)

 

 

19.7 

Foreign

 

 

(1.1)

 

 

11.2 

 

 

(8.2)

 

 

(1.1)

 

 

11.2 

 

 

(8.2)

State and local

 

 

2.8 

 

 

(3.5)

 

 

(9.6)

 

 

3.3 

 

 

(3.5)

 

 

(9.6)

Total deferred tax expense

 

 

(25.5)

 

 

(4.6)

 

 

1.9 

 

 

(14.5)

 

 

(4.6)

 

 

1.9 

Income tax expense

 

$

40.0 

 

$

43.9 

 

$

59.0 

 

$

51.0 

 

$

43.9 

 

$

59.0 

The following reconciles the total income tax expense, based on the U.S. Federal statutory income tax rate of 35%, with the Company’s recognized income tax expense:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

U.S. Statutory federal income tax expense

 

$

139.2 

 

$

67.6 

 

$

95.7 

 

$

141.2 

 

$

69.9 

 

$

96.6 

Permanent items

 

 

9.1 

 

 

5.2 

 

 

4.6 

 

 

9.1 

 

 

5.2 

 

 

4.6 

Foreign statutory rate vs. U.S. statutory rate

 

 

(38.9)

 

 

(33.8)

 

 

(28.7)

 

 

(38.9)

 

 

(33.8)

 

 

(28.7)

State income taxes, net of federal effect

 

 

4.6 

 

 

1.7 

 

 

5.4 

 

 

4.7 

 

 

1.7 

 

 

5.4 

Residual tax on foreign earnings

 

 

19.7 

 

 

24.8 

 

 

90.9 

 

 

19.7 

 

 

24.8 

 

 

90.9 

Investment in foreign subsidiary

 

 

 

 

(23.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(23.3)

 

 

Purchase accounting benefit

 

 

 

 

(22.8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(22.8)

 

 

Benefit from adjustment to tax basis in assets

 

 

(8.4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8.4)

 

 

 

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(91.3)

 

 

2.6 

 

 

(115.6)

 

 

(82.7)

 

 

0.5 

 

 

(116.5)

Unrecognized tax expense (benefit)

 

 

34.6 

 

 

(1.2)

 

 

0.5 

 

 

34.6 

 

 

(1.2)

 

 

0.5 

Foreign tax law changes

 

 

(3.7)

 

 

 

 

(7.6)

 

 

(3.7)

 

 

 

 

(7.6)

Share based compensation adjustments

 

 

(2.8)

 

 

2.3 

 

 

1.4 

 

 

(2.8)

 

 

2.3 

 

 

1.4 

Impact of IRC Section 9100 relief

 

 

(16.4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16.4)

 

 

 

 

Adjustment to prior year NOLs

 

 

 

 

14.4 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.4 

 

 

Return to provision adjustments and other, net

 

 

(5.7)

 

 

6.4 

 

 

12.4 

 

 

(5.4)

 

 

6.2 

 

 

12.4 

Income tax expense

 

$

40.0 

 

$

43.9 

 

$

59.0 

 

$

51.0 

 

$

43.9 

 

$

59.0 

104


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

(11) Segment Information



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

Deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee benefits

 

$

86.3 

 

$

63.2 

 

$

83.5 

 

$

60.9 

Restructuring

 

 

2.2 

 

 

4.1 

 

 

2.2 

 

 

4.1 

Inventories and receivables

 

 

32.6 

 

 

35.2 

 

 

32.6 

 

 

35.2 

Marketing and promotional accruals

 

 

17.6 

 

 

14.4 

 

 

17.6 

 

 

14.4 

Prepaid royalty

 

 

6.0 

 

 

6.3 

 

 

6.0 

 

 

6.3 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

8.4 

 

 

11.6 

 

 

8.4 

 

 

11.6 

Unrealized losses

 

 

4.2 

 

 

2.7 

 

 

4.2 

 

 

2.7 

Intangibles

 

 

3.7 

 

 

6.1 

 

 

3.7 

 

 

6.1 

Investment in non-US subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

23.3 

 

 

 

 

23.3 

Net operating loss and credit carry forwards

 

 

402.8 

 

 

447.7 

 

 

394.9 

 

 

441.6 

Other

 

 

24.1 

 

 

32.8 

 

 

23.8 

 

 

32.6 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

587.9 

 

 

647.4 

 

 

576.9 

 

 

638.8 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

20.1 

 

 

27.1 

 

 

20.1 

 

 

27.1 

Unrealized gains

 

 

5.1 

 

 

18.6 

 

 

5.1 

 

 

18.6 

Intangibles

 

 

813.4 

 

 

840.8 

 

 

813.4 

 

 

840.8 

Taxes on unremitted foreign earnings

 

 

2.7 

 

 

2.4 

 

 

2.7 

 

 

2.4 

Other

 

 

15.3 

 

 

16.3 

 

 

15.3 

 

 

16.3 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

856.6 

 

 

905.2 

 

 

856.6 

 

 

905.2 

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(268.7)

 

 

(257.8)

 

 

(279.7)

 

 

(266.4)

Valuation allowance

 

 

(245.7)

 

 

(305.4)

 

 

(245.7)

 

 

(296.8)

Net deferred tax liabilities, net valuation allowance

 

$

(514.4)

 

$

(563.2)

 

$

(525.4)

 

$

(563.2)

Reported as:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred charges and other

 

$

18.3 

 

$

9.3 

 

$

7.3 

 

$

9.3 

Deferred taxes (noncurrent liability)

 

 

(532.7)

 

 

(572.5)

 

 

(532.7)

 

 

(572.5)

During the fourth quarter of the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized $23.3 million of deferred tax assets related to its investment in one of its foreign subsidiaries because it was expected to reverse in the foreseeable future. The deferred tax asset reversed during the year ended September 30, 2016. The Company managesalso recorded a $14.4 million reduction in its businessnet operating loss deferred tax assets, with a corresponding reduction in four vertically integrated, product-focused reporting segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances; (ii) Global Pet Supplies; (iii) Homethe valuation allowance, to reflect losses used as a result of prior year adjustments.

To the extent necessary, the Company intends to utilize earnings of foreign subsidiaries in order to support management's plans to voluntarily accelerate pay down of U.S. debt, fund distributions to shareholders, fund U.S. acquisitions and Garden Business;satisfy ongoing U.S. operational cash flow requirements. As a result, current and (iv) Hardware & Home Improvement.

The resultscertain prior period earnings of the HHI BusinessCompany's non-U.S. subsidiaries are includedgenerally not considered to be permanently reinvested, except in jurisdictions where repatriation is either precluded or restricted by law. The Company annually estimates the available earnings, permanent reinvestment classification and the availability of and management’s intent to use alternativemechanisms for repatriation for each jurisdiction in which the Company does business. Accordingly, the Company is providing residual U.S. and foreign deferred taxes on these earnings to the extent they cannot be repatriated in a tax-free manner.

The Company has provided residual taxes on $102.0 million of distributions from foreign earnings for the year ended September 30, 2016 with $93.6 million of earnings not yet taxed in the U.S. resulting in an increase in income tax expense of $36.7 million. The residual domestic taxes from foreign earnings are recognized as a reduction to net operating loss and credit carryforwards deferred tax assets and taxes on unremitted foreign earnings are recognized as a deferred tax liability. The Company has provided residual taxes on $37.5 million of distributions from foreign earnings for the year ended September 30, 2015 with no earnings not yet taxed in the U.S. resulting in a decrease in income tax expense of $0.3 million. Remaining undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign operations are $219.4 million at September 30, 2016, and are intended to remain permanently invested. Accordingly, no residual income taxes have been provided on those earnings. If at some future date these earnings cease to be permanently invested, the Company may be subject to U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding and other taxes on such amounts, which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

105


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of September 30, 2016, the Company has U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of $758.9 million with a federal tax benefit of $265.6 million and tax benefits related to state NOLs of $60.6 million and capital loss carryforwards of $19.8 million with a federal and state tax benefit of $7.6 million. The Company has an additional $4.3 million of federal and state NOLs for which benefits will be recorded to Additional Paid-in Capital when these carryforwards are used. These NOLs expire through years ending in 2036. As of September 30, 2016, the Company has foreign NOLs of $136.3 million and tax benefits of $38.4 million, which will expire beginning in the Company's Consolidated Statementfiscal year ending September 30, 2017. Certain of Operationsthe foreign NOLs have indefinite carryforward periods. The Company is subject to an annual limitation on the use of its NOLs that arose prior to its emergence from bankruptcy in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The Company has had multiple changes of ownership, as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that subject the Company’s U.S. federal and subsequentstate NOLs and other tax attributes to December 17, 2012,certain limitations. The annual limitation is based on a number of factors including the value of the Company’s stock (as defined for tax purposes) on the date of the Hardware Acquisition. The resultsownership change, its net unrealized gain position on that date, the occurrence of TLM Taiwan are includedrealized gains in years subsequent to the Company's Consolidated Statementownership change and the effects of Operationssubsequent ownership changes (as defined for tax purposes), if any. In addition, separate return year limitations apply to limit the Company’s utilization of the acquired Russell Hobbs U.S. federal and state NOLs to future income of the Russell Hobbs subgroup. Due to these limitations, the Company estimates, as of September 30, 2016, that $460.4 million of the total U.S. federal NOLs with a federal tax benefit of $161.1 million and subsequent to its acquisition on April 8, 2013. The financial results$16.7 million of the tax benefit related to state NOLs will expire unused even if the HHI Business are reportedCompany generates sufficient income to otherwise use all of its NOLs. The Company also projects, as a separate business segment, Hardware & Home Improvement.

Global strategic initiatives and financial objectives for each reportable segment are determined at the corporate level. Each reportable segment is responsible for implementing defined strategic initiatives and achieving certain financial objectives, and has a general manager responsible for the sales and marketing initiatives and financial results for product lines withinof September 30, 2015, that segment.
Net sales and Cost$35.4 million of goods sold to other business segments have been eliminated. The gross contribution of intersegment

97

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

sales is included in the segment selling the product to the external customer. Segment net sales are based upon the segment from which the product is shipped.
The operating segment profits do not include restructuring and related charges, acquisition and integration related charges, impairment charges, interest expense, interest income and income tax expense. Expenses associated with certain general and administrative functions necessary to reflect the operating segments on a standalone basis have also been excluded in the determination of reportable segment profits. Corporate expenses primarily include general and administrative expenses and the costs of global long-term incentive compensation plans which are evaluated on a consolidated basis and not allocated to the Company’s operating segments. All depreciation and amortization included in income from operations isbenefits related to operating segments or corporate expense. Costs are identified to operating segments or corporate expense according to the function of each cost center.
All capital expenditures are related to operating segments. Variable allocations of assets areforeign NOLs will not made for segment reporting.
Segment information for the Company for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, is as follows:
Net sales to external customers
  2013 2012 2011
Consumer batteries $931,647
 $948,652
 $953,301
Small appliances 740,289
 771,568
 777,823
Electric shaving and grooming 276,783
 279,468
 274,587
Electric personal care 254,858
 250,251
 248,442
Global Batteries & Appliances 2,203,577
 2,249,939
 2,254,153
Global Pet Supplies 621,834
 615,508
 578,905
Home and Garden Business 390,539
 386,988
 353,858
Hardware & Home Improvement 869,631
 
 
Total segments $4,085,581
 $3,252,435
 $3,186,916
Depreciation and amortization
�� 2013 2012 2011
Global Batteries & Appliances $67,229
 $63,618
 $68,111
Global Pet Supplies 29,615
 27,702
 24,274
Home and Garden Business 11,685
 13,296
 12,375
Hardware & Home Improvement 31,364
 
 
Total segments 139,893
 104,616
 104,760
Corporate 
 
 
Total Depreciation and amortization $139,893
 $104,616
 $104,760

98

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

Segment profit
  2013 2012 2011
Global Batteries & Appliances $237,544
 $244,442
 238,864
Global Pet Supplies 91,080
 85,866
 75,564
Home and Garden Business 78,483
 73,609
 65,180
Hardware & Home Improvement 88,668
 
 
Total segments 495,775
 403,917
 379,608
Corporate expenses 62,141
 51,514
 53,967
Acquisition and integration related charges 48,445
 31,066
 36,603
Restructuring and related charges 34,012
 19,591
 28,644
Intangible asset impairment 
 
 32,450
Interest expense 375,625
 191,911
 208,329
Other expense, net 3,506
 878
 2,491
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes $(27,954) $108,957
 $17,124

On February 8, 2013, the Venezuelan government announced the formal devaluation of its currency, the Bolivar fuerte, relative to the U.S. dollar. As Venezuela continues to be considered a highly inflationary economy, the functional currency of the Company's Venezuelan subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. Therefore, the Company remeasured the local statement of financial position of its Venezuela entity as of February 8, 2013 to reflect the impact of the devaluation to the official exchange rate from 4.3 to 6.3 Bolivar fuerte per U.S. dollar. The effect of the devaluation of the Bolivar fuerte was recorded in other expense, net and resulted in a $1,953 reduction to the Company's pretax income during Fiscal 2013.

Segment total assets
  September 30,
  2013 2012
Global Batteries & Appliances $2,360,733
 $2,243,472
Global Pet Supplies 948,832
 956,043
Home and Garden Business 500,559
 508,083
Hardware & Home Improvement 1,735,629
 
Total segments 5,545,753
 3,707,598
Corporate 80,920
 44,051
Total assets at year end $5,626,673
 $3,751,649
Segment long-lived assets (A)
  September 30,
  2013 2012
Global Batteries & Appliances $1,545,641
 $1,434,392
Global Pet Supplies 757,299
 768,140
Home and Garden Business 437,606
 445,774
Hardware & Home Improvement 1,335,390
 
Total segments 4,075,936
 2,648,306
Corporate 67,832
 41,916
Long-lived assets at year end $4,143,768
 $2,690,222
(A)Includes all of the Company’s non-current assets.

99

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)


Capital expenditures
  2013 2012 2011
Global Batteries & Appliances $47,928
 $36,271
 $25,471
Global Pet Supplies 8,268
 7,447
 7,059
Home and Garden Business 2,395
 3,091
 3,630
Hardware & Home Improvement 23,385
 
 
Total segments 81,976
 46,809
 36,160
Corporate 
 
 
Total Capital expenditures $81,976
 $46,809
 $36,160
Geographic Disclosures—Net sales to external customers
  2013 2012 2011
United States $2,411,409
 $1,772,138
 $1,780,127
Outside the United States 1,674,172
 1,480,297
 1,406,789
Total net sales to external customers $4,085,581
 $3,252,435
 $3,186,916

Geographic Disclosures—Long-lived assets (A)
  September 30,
  2013 2012
United States $3,218,523
 $1,988,632
Outside the United States 925,245
 701,590
Long-lived assets at year end $4,143,768
 $2,690,222
(A)Includes all of the Company’s non-current assets.

(12) Commitments and Contingencies
used. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets.

A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the ability of the Company to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions.

The Company has earned pretax profits in the US each of the last three years. Large, profitable US businesses were acquired in years ended September 30, 2015 and 2013, and the Company’s debt levels and blended interest rates have decreased over time. The combination of US operating results and the changes in the Company’s US operating profile led the Company to conclude during the year ended September 30, 2016 that it is more likely than not its U.S. deferred tax assets will be used to reduce taxable income, except for tax attributes subject to ownership change limitations, capital losses, and certain state operating losses and credits that will expire unused.

The Company released $111.1 million of domestic valuation allowance during the year ended September 30, 2016. Approximately $25.1 million of the domestic valuation allowance release results from additional deferred tax assets created by the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, effective as of October 1, 2015. In December 2015, the Company received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) which resulted in $87.8 million of U.S. net operating losses being restored and a release of $16.2 million of domestic valuation allowance from additional deferred tax assets created by the IRS ruling. The Company recorded tax expense of $3.1 million related to additional foreign valuation allowance during the year ended September 30, 2016.

As of September 30, 2016, the valuation allowance was $245.7 million, of which $203.7 million is related to U.S. net deferred tax assets and $42.0 million is related to foreign net deferred tax assets. As of September 30, 2015, the valuation allowance was $305.4 million, of which $268.7 million is related to U.S. net deferred tax assets and $36.7 million is related to foreign net deferred tax assets. During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company decreased its valuation allowance for deferred tax assets by $59.7 million, of which $65.0 million is related to a decrease in valuation allowance against U.S. net deferred tax assets and $5.3 million related to an increase in the valuation allowance against foreign net deferred tax assets. During the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded valuation allowances of $17.0 million against the deferred tax assets of various Latin America entities as it is more likely than not that the Company will not obtain tax benefits from these assets. During the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company decreased its valuation allowance for deferred tax assets by $27.7 million, of which $30.4 million related to a decrease in valuation allowance against U.S. net deferred tax assets and $2.7 million related to an increase in the valuation allowance against foreign net deferred tax assets. As a result of the AAG acquisition, the Company reversed $22.8 million of U.S. valuation allowance during the year ended September 30, 2015. The reversal was attributable to $22.8 million of net deferred tax liabilities recorded on the AAG acquisition balance sheet which offset other U.S net deferred tax assets. During the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded valuation allowances of $17.0 million against the deferred tax assets of various Latin America entities as it is more likely than not that the Company will not obtain tax benefits from these assets. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company decreased its valuation allowance for deferred tax assets by $121.5 million, of which $122.6 million related to a decrease in the valuation allowance against U.S. net deferred tax assets and $1.1 million related to an increase in the valuation allowance against foreign net deferred tax assets. As a result of the one-time internal restructuring and debt refinancing activities, the Company reversed $62.6 million of U.S. valuation allowance during the year ended September 30, 2014.

106


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2016 and 2015 are $47.4 million and $14.1 million, respectively. If recognized in the future, $47.4 million of the unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2016 will impact the effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2016 and 2015 the Company had $3.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The impact on income tax expense related to interest and penalties for the estimated costs associated with environmental remediation activities at someyears ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was a net increase of its current$0.4 million, $0.9 million and former manufacturing sites. $1.1 million, respectively.  The following table summarizes the changes to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year

 

$

14.1 

 

$

11.3 

 

$

13.8 

Gross increase – tax positions in prior period

 

 

29.9 

 

 

4.1 

 

 

1.5 

Gross decrease – tax positions in prior period

 

 

(0.4)

 

 

(1.9)

 

 

(1.4)

Gross increase – tax positions in current period

 

 

4.4 

 

 

1.8 

 

 

0.7 

Settlements

 

 

(0.6)

 

 

(0.9)

 

 

(2.5)

Lapse of statutes of limitations

 

 

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

(0.8)

Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year

 

$

47.4 

 

$

14.1 

 

$

11.3 

The increase in unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended September 30, 2016 includes a $25.5 million expense to record a tax contingency reserve for a tax exposure in Germany. During the year, a local court ruled against the Company’s characterization of certain assets as amortizable under Germany tax law. We have appealed this ruling to the German Federal Court.

The Company believesfiles income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions and is subject to ongoing examination by the various taxing authorities. The Company’s major taxing jurisdictions are the U.S., United Kingdom and Germany. In the U.S., federal tax filings for years prior to and including the Company’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 are closed. However, the federal NOLs from the Company’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2012 and prior are subject to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination until the year that any additional liabilitysuch net operating loss carryforwards are utilized and those years are closed for audit. Filings in excessvarious U.S. state and local jurisdictions are also subject to audit and to date no significant audit matters have arisen. As of September 30, 2016, certain of the amounts providedCompany’s legal entities are undergoing income tax audits. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of approximately $5,055,the examinations; however, it is reasonably possible that during the next twelve months some portion of previously unrecognized tax benefits could be recognized.

107


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 15 - RELATED PARTIES

The Company is subject to a stockholder agreement, dated February 9, 2010 (“Stockholder Agreement”), with its majority shareholder, HRG Group, Inc. (“HRG”), which may result from resolutionprovides certain protective provisions in favor of these matters,minority stockholders and provides certain rights and imposes certain obligations on HRG and its affiliates, including:

·

for so long as the HRG and their affiliates beneficially own 40% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, HRG and the Company will cooperate to ensure, to the greatest extent possible, the continuation of the structure of the Company’s board of directors as described in the Stockholder Agreement;

·

HRG will not have a material adverse effect any transfer of equity securities of the Company to any person that would result in such person and its affiliates owning 40% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, unless specified conditions are met; and

·

HRG will be granted certain access and informational rights with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries.

Certain provisions of the Stockholder Agreement terminate on the financial condition, resultsdate on which the HRG no longer constitutes a Significant Stockholder (as defined in the Stockholder Agreement). The Stockholder Agreement terminates when any person, including HRG, acquires 90% or more of operations or cash flowsthe outstanding voting securities of the Company.

HRG and the Company also entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of February 9, 2010 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which HRG and its affiliates have, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, certain demand and so-called “piggy back” registration rights with respect to their shares of the Company’s common stock.

Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Leucadia National Corporation, which through subsidiaries beneficially owns more than 10% of the outstanding common stock of HRG, which in turn owns 58% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. For the year ended September 30, 2016, Jefferies acted as one of the initial purchasers for SBI’s offering of €425 million of its 4.00% Notes due 2026, for which Jefferies received $0.3 million in discounts, commissions and reimbursements of expenses. For the year ended September 30, 2015, Jefferies acted as (i) one of the initial purchasers for SBI’s offering of $1.0 billion of its 5.75% Notes due 2025, for which Jefferies received $2.6 million in discounts, commissions and reimbursements of expenses, (ii) one of the underwriters for the Company’s $575 million offering of common stock in May 2015, for which Jefferies received $1.5 million in discounts, commissions and reimbursements of expenses, and (iii) one of the financing institutions that committed to provide “back stop” bridge facilities in an aggregate amount of $1.5 billion in connection with the financing of the AAG acquisition, for which Jefferies received $2.1 million in fees and reimbursements of expenses.

NOTE 16 –SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

On October 21, 2010, the Board adopted the Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Award Plan (the “Equity Plan”). During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Equity Plan was amended to increase the number of shares issuable under the Equity Plan to 5,626 shares of common stock of the Company, net of cancellations.

The Company measures the compensation expense of its stock-based compensation awards, which consist of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), based on the fair value of the awards at the date of grant, and recognizes these costs on a straight line basis over the requisite service period of the awards. The fair value of the RSUs is determined based on the market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on the grant date.

During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted 0.6 million RSUs, which include 0.4 million units that vested immediately or within 12 months, and 0.2 million units that are performance-based and vest within a two-year period. During the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company granted 0.6 million RSUs, which include 0.1 million units that vested immediately or within 12 months, 0.2 unit million units that vest over a one year period, and 0.3 million units that are performance-based and vest within a two-year period. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company granted 0.7 million RSUs, which include 0.3 million units that vested immediately or within 12 months, 0.1 million units that vest over a one year period and 0.3 million units that are performance-based and vest within a twoyear period.

108


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Share based compensation expense recognized by SBH during the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $64.4 million, $47.6 million, and $46.8 million,respectively. Share based compensation expense recognized by SB/RH during the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $59.3 million, $41.8 million and $44.9 million, respectively. Share based compensation expense is recognized as General and Administrative Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The remaining unamortized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs at September 30, 2016 is $18.1 million and $16.7 million for the SBH and SB/RH, respectively. The following is a summary of the RSU activity for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH



 

 

 

Weighted

 

Fair

 

 

 

Weighted

 

Fair



 

 

 

Average

 

Value

 

 

 

Average

 

Value



 

 

 

Grant Date

 

at Grant

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

at Grant

(in millions, except per share data)

 

Shares

 

Fair Value

 

Date

 

Shares

 

Fair Value

 

Date

At September 30, 2013

 

1.1 

 

$

39.11 

 

$

43.7 

 

1.1 

 

$

39.12 

 

$

43.1 

Granted

 

0.7 

 

 

75.50 

 

 

50.5 

 

0.6 

 

 

75.82 

 

 

48.6 

Forfeited

 

 

 

69.33 

 

 

(0.4)

 

 

 

69.33 

 

 

(0.4)

Vested

 

(1.0)

 

 

39.69 

 

 

(37.8)

 

(0.9)

 

 

39.34 

 

 

(36.7)

At September 30, 2014

 

0.8 

 

 

67.66 

 

$

56.0 

 

0.8 

 

 

67.90 

 

$

54.6 

Granted

 

0.6 

 

 

92.51 

 

 

52.9 

 

0.5 

 

 

93.12 

 

 

42.3 

Forfeited

 

(0.1)

 

 

85.16 

 

 

(5.3)

 

(0.1)

 

 

85.16 

 

 

(5.3)

Vested

 

(0.7)

 

 

69.00 

 

 

(50.4)

 

(0.7)

 

 

68.98 

 

 

(49.5)

At September 30, 2015

 

0.6 

 

 

87.50 

 

$

53.2 

 

0.5 

 

 

87.71 

 

$

42.1 

Granted

 

0.6 

 

 

94.88 

 

 

56.0 

 

0.6 

 

 

95.00 

 

 

54.1 

Forfeited

 

(0.1)

 

 

92.26 

 

 

(6.6)

 

(0.1)

 

 

92.26 

 

 

(6.6)

Vested

 

(0.5)

 

 

86.97 

 

 

(47.8)

 

(0.5)

 

 

86.78 

 

 

(44.3)

At September 30, 2016

 

0.6 

 

 

94.97 

 

$

54.8 

 

0.5 

 

 

96.92 

 

$

45.3 

109


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 17 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, was as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Foreign

 

 

 

Employee

 

 



 

Currency

 

Hedging

 

Benefit

 

 

(in millions)

 

Translation

 

Activity

 

Plans

 

Total

Year Ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, as of September 30, 2013

 

$

(7.0)

 

$

(2.3)

 

$

(29.2)

 

$

(38.5)

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification

 

 

(32.6)

 

 

13.1 

 

 

(6.6)

 

 

(26.1)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

 

 

2.6 

 

 

1.4 

 

 

4.0 

Other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(32.6)

 

 

15.7 

 

 

(5.2)

 

 

(22.1)

Deferred tax effect

 

 

 

 

(4.2)

 

 

2.9 

 

 

(1.3)

Deferred tax valuation allowance

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.3)

 

 

(1.3)

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

(32.6)

 

 

11.5 

 

 

(3.6)

 

 

(24.7)

Other comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1)

Other comprehensive (loss) income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

(32.5)

 

 

11.5 

 

 

(3.6)

 

 

(24.6)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, as of September 30, 2014

 

 

(39.5)

 

 

9.2 

 

 

(32.8)

 

 

(63.1)

Year Ended September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification

 

 

(113.0)

 

 

11.3 

 

 

(12.9)

 

 

(114.6)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

(27.5)

 

 

1.4 

 

 

(26.1)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

(113.0)

 

 

(16.2)

 

 

(11.5)

 

 

(140.7)

Deferred tax effect

 

 

 

 

5.2 

 

 

3.9 

 

 

9.1 

Deferred tax valuation allowance

 

 

 

 

(2.2)

 

 

(3.4)

 

 

(5.6)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

(113.0)

 

 

(13.2)

 

 

(11.0)

 

 

(137.2)

Other comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2)

Other comprehensive loss attributable to controlling interest

 

 

(112.8)

 

 

(13.2)

 

 

(11.0)

 

 

(137.0)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, as of September 30, 2015

 

 

(152.3)

 

 

(4.0)

 

 

(43.8)

 

 

(200.1)

Year Ended September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification

 

 

(6.2)

 

 

11.1 

 

 

(41.4)

 

 

(36.5)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

(1.1)

 

 

2.4 

 

 

1.3 

Other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(6.2)

 

 

10.0 

 

 

(39.0)

 

 

(35.2)

Deferred tax effect

 

 

(2.3)

 

 

(2.8)

 

 

10.9 

 

 

5.8 

Deferred tax valuation allowance

 

 

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

(0.2)

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

(8.5)

 

 

7.1 

 

 

(28.2)

 

 

(29.6)

Other comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3)

Other comprehensive (loss) income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

(8.2)

 

 

7.1 

 

 

(28.2)

 

 

(29.3)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, as of September 30, 2016

 

$

(160.5)

 

$

3.1 

 

$

(72.0)

 

$

(229.4)

See Note 12, “Derivatives” for further detail on the Company’s derivative hedging activity. See Note 13, “Employee Benefit Plans” for further detail over the Company’s defined benefit plans.

NOTE 18 -COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a defendant in various litigation matters generally arising out of the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that any of the matters or proceedings presently pending will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or cash flows.

The Company’s minimum rent payments under operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis overCompany has provided for the termestimated costs of $4.4 million, as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, associated with environmental remediation activities at some of its current and former manufacturing sites. The Company believes that any additional liability in excess of the leases. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases, principally pertaining to land, buildings and equipment, are as follows:

amounts provided that may result from resolution of these matters, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.


100

110


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 19 - (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

  
2014$39,491
201533,376
201627,906
201723,471
201814,578
Thereafter34,298
  
Total minimum lease payments$173,120
  
AllSEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company identifies its segments based upon the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of the leases expire between October 2013 and July 2023. The Company’s total rent expense was $41,829, $34,327 and $40,298 during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively.


(13) Related Party Transactions
Merger Agreement and Exchange Agreement
On June 16, 2010 (the “Closing Date”), SB Holdings completed the merger with Russell Hobbs, Inc. ("Russell Hobbs")(the "Merger) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 9, 2010, as amended on March 1, 2010, March 26, 2010 and April 30, 2010, by and among SB Holdings, Russell Hobbs, Spectrum Brands, Battery Merger Corp., and Grill Merger Corp. (the “Merger Agreement”). As a result of the Merger, each of Spectrum Brands and Russell Hobbs became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SB Holdings. At the effective time of the Merger, (i) the outstanding shares of Spectrum Brands common stock were canceled and converted into the right to receive shares of SB Holdings common stock, and (ii) the outstanding shares of Russell Hobbs common stock and preferred stock were canceled and converted into the right to receive shares of SB Holdings common stock.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on February 9, 2010, Spectrum Brands entered into support agreements with Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd., Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P. and Global Opportunities Breakaway Ltd. (together the "Harbinger Parties") and Avenue International Master, L.P. and certain of its affiliates (the “Avenue Parties”), in which the Harbinger Parties and the Avenue Parties agreed to vote their shares of Spectrum Brands common stock acquired before the date of the Merger Agreement in favor of the Merger and against any alternative proposal that would impede the Merger.
Immediately following the consummation of the Merger, the Harbinger Parties owned approximately 64% of the outstanding SB Holdings common stock and the stockholders of Spectrum Brands (other than the Harbinger Parties) owned approximately 36% of the outstanding SB Holdings common stock.
On January 7, 2011, the Harbinger Parties contributed 27,757 shares of SB Holdings common stock to Harbinger Group Inc. (“HRG”) and received in exchange for such shares an aggregate of 119,910 shares of HRG common stock (such transaction, the “Share Exchange”), pursuant to a Contribution and Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”). Immediately following the Share Exchange, (i) HRG owned approximately 54.4% of the outstanding shares of SB Holding’s common stock and the Harbinger Parties owned approximately 12.7% of the outstanding shares of SB Holdings common stock, and (ii) the Harbinger Parties owned 129,860 shares of HRG common stock, or approximately 93.3% of the outstanding HRG common stock.
In connection with the Merger, the Harbinger Parties and SB Holdings entered into a stockholder agreement, dated February 9, 2010 (the “Stockholder Agreement”), which provides for certain protective provisions in favor of minority stockholders and provides certain rights and imposes certain obligations on the Harbinger Parties, including:
for so long as the Harbinger Parties and their affiliates beneficially own 40% or more of the outstanding voting securities of SB Holdings, the Harbinger Parties and the Company will cooperate to ensure, to the greatest extent possible, the continuation of the structure of the SB Holdings board of directors as described in the Stockholder Agreement;
the Harbinger Parties will not effect any transfer of equity securities of SB Holdings to any person that would result in such person and its affiliates owning 40% or more of the outstanding voting securities of SB Holdings, unless specified conditions are met; and

101

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

the Harbinger Parties will be granted certain access and informational rights with respect to SB Holdings and its subsidiaries.
Pursuant to a joinder to the Stockholder Agreement entered into by the Harbinger Parties and HRG, upon consummation of the Share Exchange, HRG became a party to the Stockholder Agreement, and is subject to all of the covenants, terms and conditions of the Stockholder Agreement to the same extent as the Harbinger Parties were bound thereunder prior to giving effect to the Share Exchange.
Certain provisions of the Stockholder Agreement terminate on the date on which the Harbinger Parties or HRG no longer constitutes a Significant Stockholder (as defined in the Stockholder Agreement). The Stockholder Agreement terminates when any person (including the Harbinger Parties or HRG) acquires 90% or more of the outstanding voting securities of SB Holdings.
Also in connection with the Merger, the Harbinger Parties and SB Holdings entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of February 9, 2010 (the “SB Holdings Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which the Harbinger Parties have, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, certain demand and so-called “piggy back” registration rights with respect to their shares of SB Holdings common stock. On September 10, 2010, the Harbinger Parties and HRG entered into a joinder to the SB Holdings Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which, effective upon the consummation of the Share Exchange, HRG became a party to the SB Holdings Registration Rights Agreement, entitled to the rights and subject to the obligations of a holder thereunder.

(14)RESTRUCTURING AND RELATED CHARGES
reportable segments. The Company reports restructuringmanufactures, markets and/or distributes multiple product lines through various distribution networks, and related charges associated with manufacturing and related initiatives in Cost of goods sold. Restructuring and related charges reflected in Cost of goods sold include, but are not limited to, termination, compensation and related costs associated with manufacturing employees, asset impairments relating to manufacturing initiatives, and other costs directly related to the restructuring or integration initiatives implemented.
multiple geographic regions. The Company reports restructuring and related charges relating to administrative functions in Operating expenses, such as initiatives impacting sales, marketing, distribution, or other non-manufacturing functions. Restructuring and related charges reflected in Operating expenses include, but are not limited to, termination and related costs, any asset impairments relating to the functional areas described above, and other costs directly related to the initiatives.
The following table summarizes restructuring and related charges incurred by segment for Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012Company and manages its business in fFiscal 2011ive:
 2013 2012 2011
Cost of goods sold:     
Global Batteries & Appliances$1,143
 $5,094
 $756
Hardware & Home Improvement6,246
 
 
Global Pet Supplies2,595
 4,741
 7,085
Total restructuring and related charges in cost of goods sold$9,984
 $9,835
 $7,841
Operating expenses:     
Global Batteries & Appliances$13,627
 $2,487
 $5,338
Global Pet Supplies8,556
 5,395
 9,567
Home and Garden Business598
 912
 2,704
Corporate1,247
 962
 3,194
Total restructuring and related charges in operating expenses$24,028
 $9,756
 $20,803
Total restructuring and related charges$34,012
 $19,591
 $28,644

102

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

The following table summarizes restructuring and related charges incurred by type of charge:
  2013 2012 2011
Costs included in cost of goods sold:      
Global Expense Rationalization initiatives:      
Termination benefits $2
 $
 $
Other associated costs 
 
 
Global Cost Reduction initiatives:      
Termination benefits 228
 2,941
 1,679
Other associated costs 3,330
 6,894
 5,889
HHI Business and other restructuring initiatives:      
Termination benefits 146
 
 
Other associated costs 6,278
 
 273
Total included in cost of goods sold $9,984
 $9,835
 $7,841
Costs included in operating expenses:      
Global Expense Rationalization initiatives:      
Termination benefits $10,259
 $
 $
Other associated costs 1,056
 
 
Global Cost Reduction initiatives:      
Termination benefits 6,351
 3,079
 10,155
Other associated costs 6,443
 5,776
 7,761
HHI Business and other restructuring initiatives:      
Termination benefits 
 
 956
Other associated costs (81) 901
 1,931
Total included in operating expenses $24,028
 $9,756
 $20,803
Total restructuring and related charges $34,012
 $19,591
 $28,644
Global Expense Rationalization Initiatives Summary
During the third quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, the Company implemented a series of initiatives throughout the Company to reduce operating costs (the “Global Expense Rationalization Initiatives”). These initiatives consist of headcount reductions in the vertically integrated, product-focused reporting segments: (i) Global Batteries & Appliances, segmentwhich consists of the Company’s worldwide battery, electric personal care and Corporate. Costs associated with these initiatives,small appliances businesses; (ii) Hardware & Home Improvement, which are expected to be incurred through September 30, 2015, are currently projected to total approximately $15,500.
The Company recorded $11,317consists of pretax restructuringthe Company’s worldwide hardware, home improvement and related charges during Fiscal 2013, and no pretax restructuring and related charges during Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, related to the Global Expense Rationalization Initiatives.
The following table summarizes the remaining accrual balance associated with the Global Expense Rationalization Initiatives and the activity during Fiscal 2013:
 
Termination
Benefits
 
Other
Costs
 Total
Accrual balance at September 30, 2012$
 $
 $
Provisions8,997
 (12) 8,985
Cash expenditures(2,060) (25) (2,085)
Non-cash items383
 2
 385
Accrual balance at September 30, 2013$7,320
 $(35) $7,285
Expensed as incurred (A)$1,264
 $1,068
 $2,332
 ______________________________
(A)Consists of amounts not impacting the accrual for restructuring and related charges.

103

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

The following table summarizes the expenses incurred during Fiscal 2013, the cumulative amount incurred to date and the total future expected costs to be incurred associated with the Global Expense Rationalization Initiatives by operating segment:
 
Global
Batteries &
Appliances
 Corporate Total
Restructuring and related charges during Fiscal 2013$10,070
 $1,247
 $11,317
Restructuring and related charges since initiative inception$10,070
 $1,247
 $11,317
Total future restructuring and related charges expected$3,939
 $151
 $4,090
Global Cost Reduction Initiatives Summary
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company implemented a series of initiatives within the Global Batteries & Appliances segment, theplumbing businesses; (iii) Global Pet Supplies, segment andwhich consists of the Company’s worldwide pet supplies business; (iv) Home and Garden, Business segment to reduce operating costs, and to evaluate opportunities to improve the Company’s capital structure (the “Global Cost Reduction Initiatives”). These initiatives included headcount reductions and the exit of certain facilities within eachwhich consists of the Company’s segments. These initiatives also included consultation, legalhome and accounting fees related to the evaluationgarden and insect control businesses; and (v) Global Auto Care, and consists of the Company’s capital structure. Costs associated with theseautomotive appearance and performance products. Global strategic initiatives whichand financial objectives for each reportable segment are expecteddetermined at the corporate level. Each segment is responsible for implementing defined strategic initiatives and achieving certain financial objectives, and has a general manager responsible for the sales and marketing initiatives and financial results for product lines within the segment. Net sales attributable to be incurred through January 31, 2015,foreign countries are projected to total approximately $102,400.
The Company recorded $16,352, $18,690 and $25,484 of pretax restructuring and related charges during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively, related todetermined based on the Global Cost Reduction Initiatives.
The following table summarizes the remaining accrual balance associated with the Global Cost Reduction Initiatives and the activity during Fiscal 2013:
 
Termination
Benefits
 
Other
Costs
 Total
Accrual balance at September 30, 2012$3,252
 $1,095
 $4,347
Provisions5,276
 525
 5,801
Cash expenditures(3,576) (1,235) (4,811)
Non-cash items(25) 39
 14
Accrual balance at September 30, 2013$4,927
 $424
 $5,351
Expensed as incurred (A) 
$1,303
 $9,248
 $10,551
 ______________________________
(A)Consists of amounts not impacting the accrual for restructuring and related charges.
The following table summarizes the expenses incurred during Fiscal 2013, the cumulative amount incurred to date and the total future expected costs to be incurred associated with the Global Cost Reduction Initiatives by operating segment:
 
Global
Batteries &
Appliances
 
Global Pet
Supplies
 
Home and
Garden
Business
 Corporate Total
Restructuring and related charges during Fiscal 2013$4,604
 $11,150
 $598
 $
 $16,352
Restructuring and related charges since initiative inception$25,413
 $48,149
 $18,219
 $7,591
 $99,372
Total future restructuring and related charges expected$500
 $2,500
 $
 $
 $3,000
The Company recorded $6,228 of restructuring and related charges during Fiscal 2013,and no restructuring and related charges during Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, related to initiatives implemented by the HHI Business prior to the Company's

104

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

acquisition on December 17, 2012.
In connection with other restructuring efforts, the Company recorded $115, $901 and $3,160 during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively.

(15)ACQUISITIONS
In accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”), the Company accounts for acquisitions by applying the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires, among other things, that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination be measured at their fair values asdomiciled country of the closing date of the acquisition.customer.
HHI Business
On December 17, 2012, the Company completed the cash acquisition of the HHI Business from Stanley Black & Decker. A portion of the HHI Business, consisting of the purchase of certain assets of TLM Taiwan, closed on April 8, 2013.
The following table summarizes the preliminary consideration paid for the HHI Business:
Negotiated sales price, excluding TLM Taiwan$1,300,000
Working capital and other adjustments at December 17, 2012 close(10,738)
Final working capital adjustment(7,669)
Final purchase price, excluding TLM Taiwan$1,281,593
Negotiated sales price, TLM Taiwan100,000
Final TLM Taiwan working capital and other adjustments(6,500)
Total HHI Business purchase price$1,375,093

The HHI Business is a major manufacturer and supplier of residential locksets, residential builders' hardware and faucets with a portfolio of recognized brand names, including Kwikset, Weiser, Baldwin, National Hardware, Stanley, FANAL and Pfister, as well as patented technologies such as the SmartKey, a re-keyable lockset technology, and Smart Code Home Connect. Customers of the HHI Business include retailers, non-retail distributors and homebuilders. Headquartered in Lake Forest, California, the HHI Business has a global

Net sales force and operates manufacturing and distribution facilities in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and Asia.

The results of the HHI Business are included in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations as of and subsequent to December 17, 2012, the date of the Hardware Acquisition. The results of the TLM Business are included in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations as of and subsequent to its acquisition on April 8, 2013. The financial results of the HHI Business are reported as a separate business segment, Hardware & Home Improvement.
Preliminary Valuation of Assets and Liabilities
The preliminary fair values of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the purchase of the HHI Business, excluding TLM Taiwan, have been recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position based upon their preliminary values at December 17, 2012. The preliminary fair values of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the TLM Taiwan purchase have been recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position based upon their preliminary values at April 8, 2013. The excess of the purchase price over the preliminary fair values of the net tangible and intangible assets was recorded as goodwill, and includes value associated with greater product diversity, stronger relationships with core retail partners, cross-selling opportunities in all channels and a new platform for potential future global growth using the Company's existing international infrastructure, most notably in Europe. The majority of goodwill recorded is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. The preliminary fair values recorded were based upon a preliminary valuation and the estimates and assumptions used in such valuation are subject to change, which could be significant, within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). The primary areas of the preliminary valuation that are not yet finalized relate to the fair values of amounts for income taxes including deferred tax accounts, amounts for uncertain tax positions and net operating loss carryforwards inclusive of associated limitations and valuation allowances and the final amount of residual goodwill. Additionally, finalized fair values associated with deferred tax accounts could have a material effect on the Company's estimated reversal of its consolidated U.S. valuation allowances against deferred tax assets recognized during the measurement period. See Note 9, "Income Taxes," for further information. The Company expects to continue to obtain information to assist it in determining the fair values of the net

105

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

assets acquired at the acquisition date during the measurement period. The preliminary valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the HHI Business, including a reconciliation to the preliminary valuation reported as of December 30, 2012, is as follows:
 
HHI Business Preliminary Valuation
December 30, 2012
TLM Taiwan Preliminary Valuation June 30, 2013Adjustments / reclassifications
Preliminary Valuation
September 30, 2013
Cash$17,406
843
$5,836
$24,085
Accounts receivable104,641
11
4,007
108,659
Inventory207,160
1,135
62
208,357
Prepaid expenses and other13,311
2,148
(6,176)9,283
Property, plant and equipment104,502
36,750
(2,861)138,391
Intangible assets470,000
17,100
2,000
489,100
Other long-term assets3,051
124
4,339
7,514
Total assets acquired$920,071
$58,111
$7,207
$985,389
Accounts payable130,140

7,967
138,107
Deferred tax liability - current7,081

83
7,164
Accrued liabilities37,530
241
4,966
42,737
Deferred tax liability - long-term104,708
1,930
9,791
116,429
Other long-term liabilities11,231
8,089
453
19,773
Total liabilities assumed$290,690
$10,260
$23,260
$324,210
Total identifiable net assets629,381
47,851
(16,053)661,179
Noncontrolling interest(2,235)
(1,704)(3,939)
Goodwill662,116
45,649
10,088
717,853
Total net assets$1,289,262
$93,500
$(7,669)$1,375,093
Since the preliminary valuation on December 30, 2012, the Company recorded $45,649 to goodwill related to the acquisition of TLM Taiwan on April 8, 2013, and recorded adjustments to the preliminary valuation of assets and liabilities, excluding TLM Taiwan, resulting in a net increase to goodwill of $10,088.  The preliminary goodwill increased $9,791 as a result of recording certain state and foreign valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, $2,861 resulting from a reduction in certain property, plant and equipment asset values and $7,022 from changes in working capital and other asset and liability accounts based on new information obtained by the Company.  The preliminary goodwill decreased $7,669 as a result of the final working capital adjustment related to the December 17, 2012 close and $2,000 as a result of new information related to intangible assets which increased their value. The changes in estimates were the result of additional accounting information provided by Stanley Black & Decker during the period, as well as items identified by management. The Company believes that the information gathered to date provides a reasonable basis for estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, but the Company is waiting for additional information necessary to finalize those fair values. Thus, the provisional measurements of fair value set forth above are subject to change further. The Company expects to complete the purchase accounting process as soon as practicable but no later than one year from the acquisition date.

Preliminary Pre-Acquisition Contingencies Assumed
The Company has evaluated and continues to evaluate pre-acquisition contingencies relating to the HHI Business that existed as of the acquisition date. Based on the evaluation to date, the Company has preliminarily determined that certain pre-acquisition contingencies are probable in nature and estimable as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the Company has recorded its best estimatessegments for these contingencies as part of the preliminary valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired for the HHI Business. The Company continues to gather information relating to all pre-acquisition contingencies that it has assumed from the HHI Business. Any changes to the pre-acquisition contingency amounts recorded during the measurement period will be included in the final valuation and related amounts recognized. Subsequent to the end of the measurement period, any adjustments to pre-acquisition contingency amounts will be reflected in the Company's results of operations.

106

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

Preliminary Valuation Adjustments
The Company performed a preliminary valuation of the assets and liabilities of the HHI Business, excluding TLM Taiwan, on December 17, 2012. The Company performed a preliminary valuation of the assets and liabilities of TLM Taiwan on April 8, 2013. Significant adjustments as a result of the preliminary valuation and the bases for their determination are summarized as follows:
Inventories- An adjustment of $31,000 was recorded to adjust inventory to fair value. Finished goods were valued at estimated selling prices less the sum of costs of disposal and a reasonable profit allowance for the selling effort.
Property, plant and equipment- An adjustment of $10,007 was recorded to adjust the net book value of property, plant and equipment to fair value giving consideration to the highest and best use of the assets. The valuation of the Company's property, plant and equipment was based on the cost approach.
Certain indefinite-lived intangible assets were valued using a relief from royalty methodology. Customer relationships and certain definite-lived intangible assets were valued using a multi-period excess earnings method. The total fair value of indefinite and definite lived intangibles was $489,100. A summary of the significant key inputs is as follows:
The Company valued customer relationships using the income approach, specifically the multi-period excess earnings method. In determining the fair value of the customer relationships, the multi-period excess earnings approach values the intangible asset at the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable only to the customer relationship after deducting contributory asset charges. The incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the subject intangible asset are then discounted to their present value. Only expected sales from current customers were used, which included an annual expected growth rate of 2.5% - 15.5%. The Company assumed a customer retention rate of approximately 95%, which was supported by historical retention rates. Income taxes were estimated at 17% - 35% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 12%. The customer relationships were valued at $90,000 under this approach and will be amortized over 20 years.
The Company valued indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks using the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade name was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions of the HHI Business, related trademarks and trade names, other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and perceived contribution of the trademarks and trade names. Royalty rates used in the determination of the fair values of trade names and trademarks ranged from 3% - 5% of expected net sales related to the respective trade names and trademarks. The Company anticipates using the majority of the trade names and trademarks for an indefinite period as demonstrated by the sustained use of each subject trademark. In estimating the fair value of the trademarks and trade names, Net sales for significant trade names and trademarks were estimated to grow at a rate of 2.5% - 5% annually with a terminal year growth rate of 2.5%. Income taxes were estimated at 35% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 12%. Trade name and trademarks were valued at $331,000 under this approach.
The Company valued definite lived trade names using the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade name was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions of the HHI Business, related trademarks and trade names, other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and perceived contribution of the trademarks and trade names. The royalty rates used in the determination of the fair values of the trade names ranged from 1% - 3.5% of expected net sales related to the respective trade name. The Company assumed an 8 year useful life of the trade name. In estimating the fair value of the trade name, Net sales for the trade name were estimated to grow at a rate of 2.5% - 15.5% annually. Income taxes were estimated at 17% - 35% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 12%. The trade names were valued at $4,100 under this approach.
The Company valued a trade name license agreement using the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the trade name was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions of the HHI Business, related trademarks and trade names, other similar trademark licensing and transaction agreements and the relative profitability and

107

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

perceived contribution of the trademarks and trade names. The royalty rate used in the determination of the fair value of the trade name license agreement was 4% of expected Net sales related to the respective trade name. In estimating the fair value of the trade name license agreement, Net sales were estimated to grow at a rate of 2.5% - 5% annually. The Company assumed a 5 year useful life of the trade name license agreement. Income taxes were estimated at 35% and amounts were discounted using a rate of 12%. The trade name license agreement was valued at $13,000 under this approach.
The Company valued technology using the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the technology was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions of the HHI Business, related licensing agreements and the importance of the technology and profit levels, among other considerations. Royalty rates used in the determination of the fair values of technologies ranged from 4% - 5% of expected Net sales related to the respective technology. The Company anticipates using these technologies through the legal life of the underlying patent; therefore, the expected life of these technologies was equal to the remaining legal life of the underlying patents which was 10 years. In estimating the fair value of the technologies, Net sales were estimated to grow at a rate of 2.5% - 31% annually. Income taxes were estimated at 35% and amounts were discounted using the rate of 12%. The technology assets were valued at $51,000 under this approach.
Deferred tax liabilities, net- An adjustment of $123,593 was recorded to adjust deferred taxes for the preliminary fair value adjustments made in accounting for the purchase.

Supplemental Pro Forma Information (Unaudited)
The following reflects the Company's pro forma results had the results of the HHI Business been included for all periods presented.
 2013 2012 2011
Net sales:     
Reported Net sales$4,085,581
 $3,252,435
 $3,186,916
HHI Business adjustment (1)191,777
 973,648
 975,096
Pro forma Net sales$4,277,358
 $4,226,083
 $4,162,012
    
  
Net (loss) income:   
  
Reported Net (loss) income (2) (3)$(55,313) $48,572
 $(75,171)
HHI Business adjustment (1)4,942
 76,120
 77,035
Pro forma Net (loss) income$(50,371) $124,692
 $1,864
      
Basic (loss) income per share:   
  
Reported Basic (loss) income per share$(1.06) $0.94
 $(1.47)
HHI Business adjustment (1)0.09
 1.47
 1.51
Pro forma Basic (loss) income per share$(0.97) $2.41
 $0.04
      
Diluted (loss) income per share (4):   
  
Reported Diluted (loss) income per share$(1.06) $0.91
 $(1.47)
HHI Business adjustment (1)0.09
 1.43
 1.51
Pro forma Diluted (loss) income per share$(0.97) $2.34
 $0.04
(1)The results related to the HHI Business adjustment do not reflect the TLM Taiwan business as stand alone financial data is not available for the periods presented. The TLM Taiwan business is not deemed material to the operating results of the Company.
(2)
Included in Reported Net (loss) income for Fiscal 2013, is an adjustment of $49,848 to record the income tax benefit

108

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

resulting from the reversal of U.S. valuation allowances on deferred tax assets as a result of the HHI Business acquisition. For information pertaining to the income tax benefit, see Note 9, “Income Taxes.”
(3)
Included in Reported Net (loss) income for Fiscal 2013, is $36,932, of Acquisition and integration related charges as a result of the HHI Business acquisition. For information pertaining to Acquisition and integration related charges, see Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies - Acquisition and Integration Related Charges.”
(4)
For Fiscal 2013, the Company has not assumed the exercise of common stock equivalents as the impact would be antidilutive due to the loss reported.
Shaser
On November 8, 2012, the Company completed the cash acquisition of approximately a 56% interest in Shaser Biosciences, Inc. ("Shaser"). Shaser is a global technology leader in developing energy-based, aesthetic dermatological technology for home use devices. This acquisition was not significant individually.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Shaser:
Negotiated sales price$50,000
Preliminary working capital adjustment(423)
Final working capital adjustment58
Final purchase price$49,635
The purchase agreement provides the Company with an option, exercisable solely at the Company's discretion, to acquire the remaining 44% interest of Shaser (the "Call Option"). The Call Option is exercisable any time between January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2017 at a price equal to 1.0x trailing revenues or 7.0x adjusted trailing EBITDA, as defined, for the calendar year ending December 31, 2016.  
The results of Shaser’s operations since November 8, 2012 are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and are reported as part of the Global Batteries & Appliances segment.
Valuation of Assets and Liabilities

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Shaser acquisition have been measured at their fair values at November 8, 2012 as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill, which includes value associated with the assembled workforce including an experienced research team, and is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. The fair values recorded were determined based upon a valuation and the estimates and assumptions used in such valuation are final and the measurement period has closed.
The fair values recorded for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Shaser, including a reconciliation to the preliminary valuation reported as of December 30, 2012, are as follows:
 
Preliminary Valuation
December 30, 2012
Adjustments / reclassifications
Final Valuation
September 30, 2013
Cash$870
$
$870
Intangible asset35,500
(6,200)29,300
Other assets2,679
(2,531)148
Total assets acquired$39,049
$(8,731)$30,318
Total liabilities assumed14,398
(5,566)8,832
Total identifiable net assets24,651
(3,165)21,486
Noncontrolling interest(38,954)(46)(39,000)
Goodwill63,880
3,269
67,149
Total identifiable net assets$49,577
$58
$49,635

Subsequent to the preliminary purchase accounting, the Company recorded adjustments to the preliminary valuation of

109

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share figures)

assets and liabilities resulting in a net increase to goodwill of $3,269.  Goodwill increased as a result of further information to support a key valuation factor that impacted the valuation of the technology asset acquired, and the resulting changes to the deferred tax asset and liabilities.  This revised information was provided by Shaser during the period. 

Pre-Acquisition Contingencies Assumed
The Company has evaluated pre-acquisition contingencies relating to Shaser that existed as of the acquisition date. Based on the evaluation, the Company has determined that certain pre-acquisition contingencies are probable in nature and estimable as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the Company has recorded its best estimates for these contingencies as part of the purchase accounting for Shaser.
Valuation Adjustments
The Company performed a valuation of the acquired proprietary technology assets, the non-controlling interest and the Call Option related to Shaser at November 8, 2012. A summary of the significant key inputs is as follows:
The Company valued the technology assets using the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method. Under this method, the asset value was determined by estimating the hypothetical royalties that would have to be paid if the technology was not owned. Royalty rates were selected based on consideration of several factors, including prior transactions of Shaser, related licensing agreements and the importance of the technology and profit levels, among other considerations. The royalty rate used in the determination of the fair value of the technology asset was 10.5% of expected Net sales related to the technology. The Company anticipates using the technology through the legal life of the underlying patent and therefore the expected life of the technology was equal to the remaining legal life of the underlying patent which was 13 years. In estimating the fair value of the technology, Net sales were estimated to grow at a long-term rate of 3% annually. Income taxes were estimated at 35% and amounts were discounted using the rate of 11%. The technology asset was valued at approximately $29,300 under this approach.
The Company valued the non-controlling interest in Shaser, a private company, by applying both income and market approaches. Under these methods, the non-controlling value was determined by using a discounted cash flow method, a guideline companies method, and a recent transaction approach. In estimating the fair value of the non-controlling interest, key assumptions include (i) cash flow projections based on market participant data and estimates by Company management, with Net sales estimated to grow at a terminal growth rate of 3% annually, income taxes estimated at 35%, and amounts discounted using a rate of 17%, (ii) financial multiples of companies deemed to be similar to Shaser, and (iii) adjustments because of lack of control or lack of marketability that market participants would consider when estimating the fair value of the non-controlling interest in Shaser. The non-controlling interest was valued at $39,000 under this approach.
The Company, in connection with valuing the non-controlling interest in Shaser, also valued the Call Option. In addition to the valuation methods and key assumptions discussed above, the Company compared the forecasted revenue and EBITDA multiples, as defined, associated with the Call Option to current guideline companies. The Call Option was determined to have an immaterial value under this approach.

(16) NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new accounting guidance which requires entities to present net income and other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. The guidance requiring disclosure of the income statement location where gains and losses reclassified out of comprehensive income are included was deferred in December 2011. In November 2012, the FASB clarified its position on the reclassification disclosures, allowing disclosure of reclassification adjustments on the face of the comprehensive income statement or in the notes to the financial statements. The accounting guidance requiring a comprehensive income statement is now effective for the Company. The Company has implemented all required disclosures.
Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefit

110


In July 2013, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which requires entities to present unrecognized tax benefits as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except to the extent the net operating loss carryforwards or tax credit carryforwards are not available to be used at the reporting date to settle additional income taxes, and the entity does not intend to use them for this purpose. The new accounting guidance is consistent with how the Company has historically accounted for unrecognized tax benefits in its Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, and therefore, the Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

(17) Quarterly Results (unaudited)
Fiscal 2013:
  Quarter Ended
  September 30, 2013 June 30, 2013 March 31, 2013 December 30, 2012
Net sales $1,137,732
 $1,089,825
 $987,756
 $870,268
Gross profit 396,493
 382,759
 322,904
 288,156
Net (loss) income (36,705) 36,130
 (41,232) (13,439)
Basic net (loss) income per common share $(0.70) $0.69
 $(0.79) $(0.26)
Diluted net (loss) income per common share $(0.70) $0.69
 $(0.79) $(0.26)
Fiscal 2012:
  Quarter Ended
  September 30, 2012 July 1, 2012 April 1, 2012 January 1, 2012
Net sales $832,576
 $824,803
 $746,285
 $848,771
Gross profit 279,925
 291,696
 260,031
 284,026
Net income (loss) 5,513
 58,649
 (28,660) 13,070
Basic net income (loss) per common share $0.11
 $1.14
 $(0.56) $0.25
Diluted net income (loss) per common share $0.10
 $1.13
 $(0.56) $0.25



111


SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the years ended September 30, 2013,2016, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

Net sales to external customers (in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Consumer batteries

 

$

840.7 

 

$

829.5 

 

$

957.8 

 

$

840.7 

 

$

829.5 

 

$

957.8 

Small appliances

 

 

656.0 

 

 

734.6 

 

 

730.8 

 

 

656.0 

 

 

734.6 

 

 

730.8 

Personal care

 

 

513.6 

 

 

528.1 

 

 

542.1 

 

 

513.6 

 

 

528.1 

 

 

542.1 

Global Batteries & Appliances

 

 

2,010.3 

 

 

2,092.2 

 

 

2,230.7 

 

 

2,010.3 

 

 

2,092.2 

 

 

2,230.7 

Hardware & Home Improvement

 

 

1,241.0 

 

 

1,205.5 

 

 

1,166.0 

 

 

1,241.0 

 

 

1,205.5 

 

 

1,166.0 

Global Pet Supplies

 

 

825.7 

 

 

758.2 

 

 

600.5 

 

 

825.7 

 

 

758.2 

 

 

600.5 

Home and Garden

 

 

509.0 

 

 

474.0 

 

 

431.9 

 

 

509.0 

 

 

474.0 

 

 

431.9 

Global Auto Care

 

 

453.7 

 

 

160.5��

 

 

 

 

453.7 

 

 

160.5 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

 

4,429.1 

During the year ended September 30, 20122016, the Company changed its performance metric to Adjusted EBITDA to better reflect how the Chief Operating Decision Maker is currently evaluating the business and making operating decisions. All amounts for prior periods have been recast to reflect current presentation. EBITDA is calculated by excluding the Company’s income tax expense, interest expense, depreciation expense and amortization expense (from intangible assets) from net income. Adjusted EBITDA further excludes (i) share based compensation expense as it is a non-cash based compensation cost; (ii) acquisition and integration costs that consist of transaction costs from acquisition transactions during the period, or subsequent integration related project costs directly associated with the acquired business; (iii) restructuring and related costs, which consist of project costs associated with restructuring initiatives across the segments; (iv) non-cash purchase accounting inventory adjustments recognized in earnings subsequent to an acquisition; (v) non-cash asset impairments or write-offs realized; (vi) and other. During the year ended September 30, 2011

(In thousands)
Column A Column B Column C Additions Column D Deductions Column E
Descriptions 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 Deductions 
Other
Adjustments(A)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
September 30, 2013:          
Accounts receivable allowances $21,870
 $15,506
 $
 $
 $37,376
September 30, 2012:          
Accounts receivable allowances $14,128
 $7,742
 $
 $
 $21,870
September 30, 2011:          
Accounts receivable allowances $4,351
 $9,777
 $
 $
 $14,128
 See accompanying Reports2016, other adjustments consisted of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
costs associated with the onboarding of a key executive and the involuntary transfer of inventory. During the year ended September 30, 2015, other consisted of costs associated with the exiting of a key executive, coupled with onboarding a key executive, plus a non-recurring adjustment for the devaluation of cash and cash equivalents denominated in Venezuelan currency. During the year ended September 30, 2014, other consisted of costs associated with the exiting of a key executive.




112

111


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Segment Adjusted EBITDA in relation to the Company’s reportable segments for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

Segment Adjusted EBITDA (in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Global Batteries & Appliances

 

$

311.4 

 

$

306.9 

 

$

326.6 

 

$

311.4 

 

$

306.9 

 

$

326.6 

Hardware & Home Improvement

 

 

241.6 

 

 

225.5 

 

 

210.3 

 

 

241.6 

 

 

225.5 

 

 

210.3 

Global Pet Supplies

 

 

140.1 

 

 

124.5 

 

 

113.2 

 

 

140.1 

 

 

124.5 

 

 

113.2 

Home and Garden

 

 

138.3 

 

 

124.5 

 

 

101.8 

 

 

138.3 

 

 

124.5 

 

 

101.8 

Global Auto Care

 

 

153.4 

 

 

47.3 

 

 

 

 

153.4 

 

 

47.3 

 

 

Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

984.8 

 

 

828.7 

 

 

751.9 

 

 

984.8 

 

 

828.7 

 

 

751.9 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

183.0 

 

 

170.0 

 

 

157.6 

 

 

183.0 

 

 

170.0 

 

 

157.6 

Share-based compensation

 

 

64.4 

 

 

47.6 

 

 

46.8 

 

 

59.3 

 

 

41.8 

 

 

44.9 

Corporate expenses

 

 

32.0 

 

 

28.1 

 

 

27.6 

 

 

31.4 

 

 

27.5 

 

 

26.9 

Purchase accounting inventory adjustment

 

 

 

 

21.7 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.7 

 

 

Write-off from impairment of intangible assets

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

36.7 

 

 

58.8 

 

 

20.1 

 

 

36.7 

 

 

58.8 

 

 

20.1 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

15.2 

 

 

28.7 

 

 

22.9 

 

 

15.2 

 

 

28.7 

 

 

22.9 

Interest expense

 

 

250.0 

 

 

271.9 

 

 

202.1 

 

 

250.0 

 

 

271.9 

 

 

202.1 

Other

 

 

1.2 

 

 

8.6 

 

 

1.3 

 

 

1.2 

 

 

8.6 

 

 

1.3 

Income from operations before income taxes

 

$

397.6 

 

$

193.3 

 

$

273.5 

 

$

403.3 

 

$

199.7 

 

 

276.1 

Other financial information relating to the Company’s segments is as follows for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and as of September 30, 2016 and 2015:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

Depreciation and amortization (in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Global Batteries & Appliances

 

$

72.2 

 

$

71.0 

 

$

73.1 

 

$

72.2 

 

$

71.0 

 

$

73.1 

Hardware & Home Improvement

 

 

35.4 

 

 

39.4 

 

 

40.4 

 

 

35.4 

 

 

39.4 

 

 

40.4 

Global Pet Supplies

 

 

42.7 

 

 

39.7 

 

 

31.5 

 

 

42.7 

 

 

39.7 

 

 

31.5 

Home and Garden

 

 

15.2 

 

 

13.3 

 

 

12.6 

 

 

15.2 

 

 

13.3 

 

 

12.6 

Global Auto Care

 

 

17.5 

 

 

6.6 

 

 

 

 

17.5 

 

 

6.6 

 

 

Total segments

 

 

183.0 

 

 

170.0 

 

 

157.6 

 

 

183.0 

 

 

170.0 

 

 

157.6 

Corporate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total depreciation and amortization

 

$

183.0 

 

$

170.0 

 

$

157.6 

 

$

183.0 

 

$

170.0 

 

$

157.6 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

Capital expenditures (in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Global Batteries & Appliances

 

$

49.6 

 

$

48.9 

 

$

40.3 

 

$

49.6 

 

$

48.9 

 

$

40.3 

Hardware & Home Improvement

 

 

22.3 

 

 

16.3 

 

 

21.2 

 

 

22.3 

 

 

16.3 

 

 

21.2 

Global Pet Supplies

 

 

14.4 

 

 

10.4 

 

 

5.3 

 

 

14.4 

 

 

10.4 

 

 

5.3 

Home and Garden Business

 

 

6.9 

 

 

12.3 

 

 

6.5 

 

 

6.9 

 

 

12.3 

 

 

6.5 

Global Auto Care

 

 

2.0 

 

 

1.2 

 

 

 

 

2.0 

 

 

1.2 

 

 

Total segment capital expenditures

 

 

95.2 

 

 

89.1 

 

 

73.3 

 

 

95.2 

 

 

89.1 

 

 

73.3 

Corporate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

 

$

95.2 

 

$

89.1 

 

$

73.3 

 

$

95.2 

 

$

89.1 

 

$

73.3 

112


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

Segment total assets (in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

Global Batteries & Appliances

 

$

2,045.0 

 

$

2,080.4 

 

$

2,045.0 

 

$

2,080.4 

Hardware & Home Improvement

 

 

1,594.7 

 

 

1,619.9 

 

 

1,594.7 

 

 

1,619.9 

Global Pet Supplies

 

 

1,074.1 

 

 

1,125.2 

 

 

1,074.1 

 

 

1,125.2 

Home and Garden

 

 

556.8 

 

 

530.9 

 

 

556.8 

 

 

530.9 

Global Auto Care

 

 

1,494.3 

 

 

1,543.1 

 

 

1,494.3 

 

 

1,543.1 

Total segment assets

 

 

6,764.9 

 

 

6,899.5 

 

 

6,764.9 

 

 

6,899.5 

Corporate

 

 

304.2 

 

 

294.3 

 

 

288.6 

 

 

294.2 

Total assets

 

$

7,069.1 

 

$

7,193.8 

 

$

7,053.5 

 

$

7,193.7 

Net sales for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and long-lived asset information as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 by geographic area are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

Net sales to external parties - Geographic Disclosure (in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

United States

 

$

3,217.9 

 

$

2,907.9 

 

$

2,640.7 

 

$

3,217.9 

 

$

2,907.9 

 

$

2,640.7 

Europe/MEA

 

 

1,090.7 

 

 

1,049.8 

 

 

970.4 

 

 

1,090.7 

 

 

1,049.8 

 

 

970.4 

Latin America

 

 

372.7 

 

 

381.5 

 

 

414.3 

 

 

372.7 

 

 

381.5 

 

 

414.3 

North America - Other

 

 

192.4 

 

 

164.0 

 

 

196.0 

 

 

192.4 

 

 

164.0 

 

 

196.0 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

166.0 

 

 

187.2 

 

 

207.7 

 

 

166.0 

 

 

187.2 

 

 

207.7 

Net sales

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

 

$

5,039.7 

 

$

4,690.4 

 

$

4,429.1 

Signatures



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

SBH

 

SB/RH

Long-lived assets - Geographic Disclosure (in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

United States

 

$

322.1 

 

$

311.1 

 

$

322.1 

 

$

311.1 

Europe/MEA

 

 

141.4 

 

 

139.2 

 

 

141.4 

 

 

139.2 

Latin America

 

 

33.6 

 

 

14.6 

 

 

33.6 

 

 

14.6 

North America - Other

 

 

3.5 

 

 

2.4 

 

 

3.5 

 

 

2.4 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

41.5 

 

 

39.8 

 

 

41.5 

 

 

39.8 

Total long-lived assets

 

$

542.1 

 

$

507.1 

 

$

542.1 

 

$

507.1 

113


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 20 - EARNINGS PER SHARE - SBH

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to controlling interest by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the dilution that would occur if restricted stock units were converted into common shares that then shared in the net income of the entity available to common shareholders, as long as their effect is not antidilutive. In computing diluted earnings per share, basic earnings per share is adjusted for the assumed issuance of potentially diluted share-based awards, including restricted stock units. The Company uses the treasury stock method to reflect dilution of restricted stock units.

The reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation and the anti-dilutive shares for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Numerator

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

$

357.1 

 

$

148.9 

 

$

214.1 

Denominator

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

 

 

59.3 

 

 

55.6 

 

 

52.6 

Dilutive shares

 

 

0.3 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

0.7 

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted

 

 

59.6 

 

 

55.9 

 

 

53.3 

Earnings per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

6.02 

 

$

2.68 

 

$

4.07 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

5.99 

 

$

2.66 

 

$

4.02 

Weighted average number of anti-dilutive shares excluded from denominator

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted stock units

 

 

0.1 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

0.1 

Performance based restricted stock units are considered anti-dilutive if the performance targets upon which the issuance of the shares is contingent have not been achieved and the respective performance period has not been completed as of the end of the current period.

114


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 21 – GUARANTOR STATEMENTS – SB/RH

SBI (with SB/RH as a parent guarantor) (collectively, the “Parent”), with their domestic subsidiaries as subsidiary guarantors, has issued the 6.375% Notes and the 6.625% Notes under the 2020/22 Indenture, 6.125% Notes under the 2024 Indenture, the 5.75% Notes under the 2025 Indenture and the 4.00% Notes under the 2026 Indenture. See Note 10, “Debt” for further information on the 6.375% Notes, 6.625% Notes, 6.125% Notes, 5.75% Notes and 4.00% Notes.

The following consolidating financial statements illustrate the components of the consolidated financial statements of SB/RH. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method for purposes of illustrating the consolidating presentation. The elimination entries presented herein eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Financial Position

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

As of September 30, 2016 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Assets

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

98.6 

 

$

3.1 

 

$

169.1 

 

$

 

$

270.8 

Trade receivables, net

 

 

179.5 

 

 

68.7 

 

 

234.4 

 

 

 

 

482.6 

Intercompany receivables

 

 

 

 

909.1 

 

 

233.4 

 

 

(1,142.5)

 

 

Other receivables

 

 

 

 

5.5 

 

 

56.3 

 

 

(6.2)

 

 

55.6 

Inventories

 

 

372.8 

 

 

104.3 

 

 

281.1 

 

 

(17.6)

 

 

740.6 

Prepaid expenses and other

 

 

42.8 

 

 

4.4 

 

 

32.1 

 

 

(0.5)

 

 

78.8 

Total current assets

 

 

693.7 

 

 

1,095.1 

 

 

1,006.4 

 

 

(1,166.8)

 

 

1,628.4 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

241.1 

 

 

77.6 

 

 

223.4 

 

 

 

 

542.1 

Long-term intercompany receivables

 

 

365.4 

 

 

187.3 

 

 

13.7 

 

 

(566.4)

 

 

Deferred charges and other

 

 

180.5 

 

 

0.9 

 

 

41.5 

 

 

(190.8)

 

 

32.1 

Goodwill

 

 

912.1 

 

 

1,154.5 

 

 

411.8 

 

 

 

 

2,478.4 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

1,341.5 

 

 

628.5 

 

 

402.5 

 

 

 

 

2,372.5 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

 

3,497.8 

 

 

1,258.1 

 

 

(2.9)

 

 

(4,753.0)

 

 

Total assets

 

$

7,232.1 

 

$

4,402.0 

 

$

2,096.4 

 

$

(6,677.0)

 

$

7,053.5 

Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

143.6 

 

$

1.4 

 

$

19.9 

 

$

(0.9)

 

$

164.0 

Accounts payable

 

 

257.5 

 

 

58.4 

 

 

264.2 

 

 

 

 

580.1 

Intercompany accounts payable

 

 

1,157.0 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,157.0)

 

 

Accrued wages and salaries

 

 

63.9 

 

 

6.6 

 

 

52.4 

 

 

 

 

122.9 

Accrued interest

 

 

39.3 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39.3 

Other current liabilities

 

 

88.0 

 

 

11.0 

 

 

95.5 

 

 

(6.2)

 

 

188.3 

Total current liabilities

 

 

1,749.3 

 

 

77.4 

 

 

432.0 

 

 

(1,164.1)

 

 

1,094.6 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

 

3,402.5 

 

 

20.5 

 

 

33.2 

 

 

 

 

3,456.2 

Long-term intercompany debt

 

 

12.8 

 

 

346.1 

 

 

192.6 

 

 

(551.5)

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

189.0 

 

 

459.2 

 

 

80.3 

 

 

(195.8)

 

 

532.7 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

39.5 

 

 

1.0 

 

 

100.1 

 

 

 

 

140.6 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,393.1 

 

 

904.2 

 

 

838.2 

 

 

(1,911.4)

 

 

5,224.1 

Shareholder's equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other capital

 

 

2,060.9 

 

 

152.3 

 

 

(954.0)

 

 

741.7 

 

 

2,000.9 

Accumulated (deficit) earnings

 

 

8.0 

 

 

3,551.6 

 

 

2,362.1 

 

 

(5,913.6)

 

 

8.1 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(229.9)

 

 

(206.1)

 

 

(199.7)

 

 

406.3 

 

 

(229.4)

Total shareholder's equity

 

 

1,839.0 

 

 

3,497.8 

 

 

1,208.4 

 

 

(4,765.6)

 

 

1,779.6 

Non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

49.8 

 

 

 

 

49.8 

Total equity

 

 

1,839.0 

 

 

3,497.8 

 

 

1,258.2 

 

 

(4,765.6)

 

 

1,829.4 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

7,232.1 

 

$

4,402.0 

 

$

2,096.4 

 

$

(6,677.0)

 

$

7,053.5 

115


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Financial Position

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

As of September 30, 2015 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Assets

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

13.0 

 

$

8.6 

 

$

226.3 

 

$

 

$

247.9 

Trade receivables, net

 

 

175.8 

 

 

94.9 

 

 

228.1 

 

 

 

 

498.8 

Intercompany receivables

 

 

152.0 

 

 

713.8 

 

 

225.0 

 

 

(1,090.8)

 

 

Other receivables

 

 

14.3 

 

 

11.2 

 

 

62.4 

 

 

 

 

87.9 

Inventories

 

 

410.3 

 

 

95.7 

 

 

291.8 

 

 

(17.0)

 

 

780.8 

Prepaid expenses and other

 

 

36.1 

 

 

2.2 

 

 

33.0 

 

 

0.8 

 

 

72.1 

Total current assets

 

 

801.5 

 

 

926.4 

 

 

1,066.6 

 

 

(1,107.0)

 

 

1,687.5 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

235.2 

 

 

60.7 

 

 

211.2 

 

 

 

 

507.1 

Long-term intercompany receivables

 

 

2.8 

 

 

357.7 

 

 

15.4 

 

 

(375.9)

 

 

Deferred charges and other

 

 

154.8 

 

 

14.1 

 

 

35.3 

 

 

(162.1)

 

 

42.1 

Goodwill

 

 

910.7 

 

 

1,154.0 

 

 

412.0 

 

 

 

 

2,476.7 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

1,402.4 

 

 

646.6 

 

 

431.3 

 

 

 

 

2,480.3 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

 

3,150.1 

 

 

1,095.9 

 

 

(2.9)

 

 

(4,243.1)

 

 

Total assets

 

$

6,657.5 

 

$

4,255.4 

 

$

2,168.9 

 

$

(5,888.1)

 

$

7,193.7 

Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

53.4 

 

$

 

$

15.1 

 

$

 

$

68.5 

Accounts payable

 

 

281.1 

 

 

45.9 

 

 

293.6 

 

 

 

 

620.6 

Intercompany accounts payable

 

 

449.4 

 

 

 

 

28.5 

 

 

(477.9)

 

 

Accrued wages and salaries

 

 

40.3 

 

 

10.0 

 

 

46.2 

 

 

 

 

96.5 

Accrued interest

 

 

63.2 

 

 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

 

 

63.3 

Other current liabilities

 

 

84.5 

 

 

21.5 

 

 

106.0 

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

211.9 

Total current liabilities

 

 

971.9 

 

 

77.4 

 

 

489.5 

 

 

(478.0)

 

 

1,060.8 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

 

3,848.8 

 

 

 

 

23.3 

 

 

 

 

3,872.1 

Long-term intercompany debt

 

 

16.8 

 

 

578.7 

 

 

392.6 

 

 

(988.1)

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

202.1 

 

 

440.5 

 

 

94.2 

 

 

(164.3)

 

 

572.5 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

33.3 

 

 

8.8 

 

 

73.4 

 

 

 

 

115.5 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,072.9 

 

 

1,105.4 

 

 

1,073.0 

 

 

(1,630.4)

 

 

5,620.9 

Shareholder's equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other capital

 

 

1,981.7 

 

 

1,129.2 

 

 

34.7 

 

 

(1,175.7)

 

 

1,969.9 

Accumulated (deficit) earnings

 

 

(246.7)

 

 

2,139.8 

 

 

1,176.1 

 

 

(3,315.9)

 

 

(246.7)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(200.2)

 

 

(175.1)

 

 

(171.0)

 

 

346.2 

 

 

(200.1)

Total shareholder's equity

 

 

1,534.8 

 

 

3,093.9 

 

 

1,039.8 

 

 

(4,145.4)

 

 

1,523.1 

Non-controlling interest

 

 

49.8 

 

 

56.1 

 

 

56.1 

 

 

(112.3)

 

 

49.7 

Total equity

 

 

1,584.6 

 

 

3,150.0 

 

 

1,095.9 

 

 

(4,257.7)

 

 

1,572.8 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

6,657.5 

 

$

4,255.4 

 

$

2,168.9 

 

$

(5,888.1)

 

$

7,193.7 

116


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Income

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2016 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net sales

 

$

2,466.2 

 

$

1,461.2 

 

$

2,621.0 

 

$

(1,508.7)

 

$

5,039.7 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

1,671.2 

 

 

1,011.6 

 

 

1,943.1 

 

 

(1,506.6)

 

 

3,119.3 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5 

 

 

 

 

0.5 

Gross profit

 

 

795.0 

 

 

449.6 

 

 

677.4 

 

 

(2.1)

 

 

1,919.9 

Selling

 

 

317.9 

 

 

119.9 

 

 

340.3 

 

 

(1.5)

 

 

776.6 

General and administrative

 

 

229.8 

 

 

76.0 

 

 

60.9 

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

366.6 

Research and development

 

 

37.2 

 

 

6.4 

 

 

15.1 

 

 

 

 

58.7 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

21.5 

 

 

3.2 

 

 

12.0 

 

 

 

 

36.7 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

4.9 

 

 

5.7 

 

 

4.1 

 

 

 

 

14.7 

Write-off from impairment of intangible assets

 

 

4.7 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.7 

Total operating expense

 

 

616.0 

 

 

211.2 

 

 

432.4 

 

 

(1.6)

 

 

1,258.0 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

179.0 

 

 

238.4 

 

 

245.0 

 

 

(0.5)

 

 

661.9 

Interest expense

 

 

214.0 

 

 

19.9 

 

 

16.1 

 

 

 

 

250.0 

Other non-operating (income) expense, net

 

 

(381.1)

 

 

(196.4)

 

 

9.0 

 

 

577.1 

 

 

8.6 

Income from operations before income taxes

 

 

346.1 

 

 

414.9 

 

 

219.9 

 

 

(577.6)

 

 

403.3 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

(6.2)

 

 

36.6 

 

 

23.4 

 

 

(2.8)

 

 

51.0 

Net income (loss)

 

 

352.3 

 

 

378.3 

 

 

196.5 

 

 

(574.8)

 

 

352.3 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4 

 

 

 

 

0.4 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 

$

352.3 

 

$

378.3 

 

$

196.1 

 

$

(574.8)

 

$

351.9 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Income

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2015 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net sales

 

$

2,385.1 

 

$

759.6 

 

$

2,534.0 

 

$

(988.3)

 

$

4,690.4 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

1,657.0 

 

 

492.4 

 

 

1,845.5 

 

 

(976.9)

 

 

3,018.0 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.1 

 

 

 

 

2.1 

Gross profit

 

 

728.1 

 

 

267.2 

 

 

686.4 

 

 

(11.4)

 

 

1,670.3 

Selling

 

 

291.4 

 

 

89.5 

 

 

340.8 

 

 

(1.0)

 

 

720.7 

General and administrative

 

 

218.8 

 

 

40.4 

 

 

73.2 

 

 

 

 

332.4 

Research and development

 

 

33.4 

 

 

3.3 

 

 

14.6 

 

 

 

 

51.3 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

40.8 

 

 

5.7 

 

 

12.3 

 

 

 

 

58.8 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

34.0 

 

 

0.6 

 

 

(8.0)

 

 

 

 

26.6 

Total operating expense

 

 

618.4 

 

 

139.5 

 

 

432.9 

 

 

(1.0)

 

 

1,189.8 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

109.7 

 

 

127.7 

 

 

253.5 

 

 

(10.4)

 

 

480.5 

Interest expense

 

 

235.4 

 

 

6.9 

 

 

29.6 

 

 

 

 

271.9 

Other non-operating (income) expense, net

 

 

(207.1)

 

 

(151.5)

 

 

4.8 

 

 

362.7 

 

 

8.9 

Income from operations before income taxes

 

 

81.4 

 

 

272.3 

 

 

219.1 

 

 

(373.1)

 

 

199.7 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(74.4)

 

 

66.3 

 

 

52.9 

 

 

(0.9)

 

 

43.9 

Net income (loss)

 

 

155.8 

 

 

206.0 

 

 

166.2 

 

 

(372.2)

 

 

155.8 

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

0.4 

 

 

0.9 

 

 

0.9 

 

 

(1.8)

 

 

0.4 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 

$

155.4 

 

$

205.1 

 

$

165.3 

 

$

(370.4)

 

$

155.4 

117


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Income

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2014 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net sales

 

$

626.7 

 

$

2,141.3 

 

$

2,449.4 

 

$

(788.3)

 

$

4,429.1 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

447.7 

 

 

1,434.4 

 

 

1,762.7 

 

 

(788.3)

 

 

2,856.5 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

 

 

2.6 

 

 

1.1 

 

 

 

 

 

3.7 

Gross profit

 

 

179.0 

 

 

704.3 

 

 

685.6 

 

 

 

 

1,568.9 

Selling

 

 

76.6 

 

 

268.5 

 

 

333.8 

 

 

(0.7)

 

 

678.2 

General and administrative

 

 

60.5 

 

 

168.9 

 

 

89.6 

 

 

 

 

319.0 

Research and development

 

 

22.3 

 

 

12.0 

 

 

13.6 

 

 

 

 

47.9 

Acquisition and integration related charges

 

 

11.7 

 

 

8.3 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

 

 

20.1 

Restructuring and related charges

 

 

8.4 

 

 

4.0 

 

 

6.8 

 

 

 

 

19.2 

Total operating expense

 

 

179.5 

 

 

461.7 

 

 

443.9 

 

 

(0.7)

 

 

1,084.4 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

(0.5)

 

 

242.6 

 

 

241.7 

 

 

0.7 

 

 

484.5 

Interest expense

 

 

172.2 

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

30.0 

 

 

 

 

202.1 

Other non-operating (income) expense, net

 

 

(213.8)

 

 

(163.7)

 

 

3.9 

 

 

379.9 

 

 

6.3 

Income from operations before income taxes

 

 

41.1 

 

 

406.4 

 

 

207.8 

 

 

(379.2)

 

 

276.1 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

(176.0)

 

 

194.6 

 

 

40.1 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

59.0 

Net income (loss)

 

 

217.1 

 

 

211.8 

 

 

167.7 

 

 

(379.5)

 

 

217.1 

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

0.3 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

(0.6)

 

 

0.3 

Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 

$

216.8 

 

$

211.5 

 

$

167.4 

 

$

(378.9)

 

$

216.8 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2016 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net income (loss)

 

$

352.3 

 

$

378.3 

 

$

196.5 

 

$

(574.8)

 

$

352.3 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

 

 

(8.5)

 

 

(8.4)

 

 

(6.0)

 

 

14.4 

 

 

(8.5)

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

7.1 

 

 

3.2 

 

 

3.2 

 

 

(6.4)

 

 

7.1 

Defined benefit pension gain (loss)

 

 

(28.2)

 

 

(25.4)

 

 

(25.3)

 

 

50.7 

 

 

(28.2)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(29.6)

 

 

(30.6)

 

 

(28.1)

 

 

58.7 

 

 

(29.6)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

322.7 

 

 

347.7 

 

 

168.4 

 

 

(516.1)

 

 

322.7 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

 

 

(0.3)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 

$

322.7 

 

$

347.7 

 

$

168.7 

 

$

(516.1)

 

$

323.0 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2015 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net income (loss)

 

$

155.8 

 

$

206.0 

 

$

166.2 

 

$

(372.2)

 

$

155.8 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

 

 

(112.8)

 

 

(113.7)

 

 

(113.7)

 

 

227.2 

 

 

(113.0)

Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments

 

 

(13.2)

 

 

(7.9)

 

 

(7.9)

 

 

15.8 

 

 

(13.2)

Defined benefit pension (loss) gain

 

 

(11.0)

 

 

(2.2)

 

 

(2.2)

 

 

4.4 

 

 

(11.0)

Other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(137.0)

 

 

(123.8)

 

 

(123.8)

 

 

247.4 

 

 

(137.2)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

18.8 

 

 

82.2 

 

 

42.4 

 

 

(124.8)

 

 

18.6 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

0.4 

 

 

(0.2)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 

$

19.0 

 

$

82.4 

 

$

42.6 

 

$

(125.2)

 

$

18.8 

118


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Statement of Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2014 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net income (loss)

 

$

217.1 

 

$

211.8 

 

$

167.7 

 

$

(379.5)

 

$

217.1 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

 

 

(32.5)

 

 

(32.7)

 

 

(33.6)

 

 

66.3 

 

 

(32.5)

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

11.5 

 

 

11.4 

 

 

11.7 

 

 

(23.1)

 

 

11.5 

Defined benefit pension (loss) gain

 

 

(3.6)

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

(0.1)

 

 

0.2 

 

 

(3.6)

Other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(24.6)

 

 

(21.4)

 

 

(22.0)

 

 

43.4 

 

 

(24.6)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

192.5 

 

 

190.4 

 

 

145.7 

 

 

(336.1)

 

 

192.5 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

0.4 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

0.3 

 

 

(0.6)

 

 

0.4 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interest

 

$

192.1 

 

$

190.1 

 

$

145.4 

 

$

(335.5)

 

$

192.1 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2016 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net cash (used) provided by operating activities

 

$

(374.4)

 

$

408.9 

 

$

(107.7)

 

$

674.8 

 

$

601.6 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(49.7)

 

 

(8.3)

 

 

(37.2)

 

 

 

 

(95.2)

Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment

 

 

0.1 

 

 

 

 

0.9 

 

 

 

 

1.0 

Other investing activities

 

 

(1.0)

 

 

(3.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.2)

Net cash used by investing activities

 

 

(50.6)

 

 

(11.5)

 

 

(36.3)

 

 

 

 

(98.4)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

498.9 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

498.9 

Payment of debt

 

 

(863.7)

 

 

 

 

(4.4)

 

 

 

 

(868.1)

Payment of debt issuance costs

 

 

(9.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.3)

Payment of cash dividends to parent

 

 

(97.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(97.2)

Payment of contingent consideration

 

 

(3.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.2)

Advances related to intercompany transactions

 

 

985.1 

 

 

(402.9)

 

 

92.6 

 

 

(674.8)

 

 

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

 

510.6 

 

 

(402.9)

 

 

88.2 

 

 

(674.8)

 

 

(478.9)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.4)

 

 

 

 

(1.4)

Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

85.6 

 

 

(5.5)

 

 

(57.2)

 

 

 

 

22.9 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

13.0 

 

 

8.6 

 

 

226.3 

 

 

 

 

247.9 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

98.6 

 

$

3.1 

 

$

169.1 

 

$

 

$

270.8 

119


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2015 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net cash (used) provided by operating activities

 

$

(143.5)

 

$

(770.8)

 

$

(1,418.8)

 

$

2,774.9 

 

$

441.8 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(45.7)

 

 

(13.5)

 

 

(29.9)

 

 

 

 

(89.1)

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

(1,026.0)

 

 

 

 

(165.1)

 

 

 

 

(1,191.1)

Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment

 

 

0.1 

 

 

 

 

1.3 

 

 

 

 

1.4 

Other investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.9)

 

 

 

 

(0.9)

Net cash used by investing activities

 

 

(1,071.6)

 

 

(13.5)

 

 

(194.6)

 

 

 

 

(1,279.7)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

3,320.3 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,320.3 

Payment of debt

 

 

(2,521.2)

 

 

 

 

(292.0)

 

 

 

 

(2,813.2)

Payment of debt issuance costs

 

 

(38.1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(38.1)

Payment of cash dividends to parent

 

 

(72.1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(72.1)

Share based tax withholding payments, net of proceeds upon vesting

 

 

(2.6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.6)

Advances related to intercompany transactions

 

 

8.7 

 

 

781.7 

 

 

1,984.5 

 

 

(2,774.9)

 

 

Capital contribution from parent

 

 

528.3 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

528.3 

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

 

1,223.3 

 

 

781.7 

 

 

1,692.5 

 

 

(2,774.9)

 

 

922.6 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents due to Venezuela devaluation

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.5)

 

 

 

 

(2.5)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

(27.2)

 

 

 

 

(27.2)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

8.2 

 

 

(2.6)

 

 

49.4 

 

 

 

 

55.0 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

4.8 

 

 

11.2 

 

 

176.9 

 

 

 

 

192.9 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

13.0 

 

$

8.6 

 

$

226.3 

 

$

 

$

247.9 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

 

 

Guarantor

 

Nonguarantor

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended September 30, 2014 (in millions)

 

Parent

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities

 

$

616.6 

 

$

114.4 

 

$

(269.4)

 

$

(26.9)

 

$

434.7 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(23.2)

 

 

(26.4)

 

 

(23.7)

 

 

 

 

(73.3)

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

 

 

(27.6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(27.6)

Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment

 

 

0.1 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

9.0 

 

 

 

 

9.2 

Other investing activities

 

 

 

 

(1.8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.8)

Net cash used by investing activities

 

 

(23.1)

 

 

(55.7)

 

 

(14.7)

 

 

 

 

(93.5)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

230.7 

 

 

 

 

309.4 

 

 

 

 

540.1 

Payment of debt

 

 

(764.9)

 

 

 

 

(6.0)

 

 

 

 

(770.9)

Payment of debt issuance costs

 

 

(0.5)

 

 

 

 

(4.9)

 

 

 

 

(5.4)

Payment of cash dividends to parent

 

 

(77.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(77.0)

Share based tax withholding payments, net of proceeds upon vesting

 

 

(25.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25.0)

Advances related to intercompany transactions

 

 

44.1 

 

 

(52.9)

 

 

(18.1)

 

 

26.9 

 

 

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

 

 

(592.6)

 

 

(52.9)

 

 

280.4 

 

 

26.9 

 

 

(338.2)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8.3)

 

 

 

 

 

(8.3)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

0.9 

 

 

5.8 

 

 

(12.0)

 

 

 

 

(5.3)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

3.9 

 

 

5.4 

 

 

188.9 

 

 

 

 

 

198.2 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

4.8 

 

$

11.2 

 

$

176.9 

 

$

 

$

192.9 

120


Table of Contents

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

SB/RH HOLDINGS, LLC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 22 - QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

 

Quarter Ended

2016 (in millions, except per share)

 

September 30, 2016

 

July 3, 2016

 

April 3, 2016

 

January 3, 2016

Net sales

 

$

1,249.8 

 

$

1,361.5 

 

$

1,209.6 

 

$

1,218.8 

Gross profit

 

 

485.8 

 

 

530.6 

 

 

462.8 

 

 

440.7 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

89.0 

 

 

101.9 

 

 

92.6 

 

 

73.6 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

1.50 

 

$

1.72 

 

$

1.56 

 

$

1.24 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

1.49 

 

$

1.71 

 

$

1.55 

 

$

1.24 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

 

Quarter Ended

2015 (in millions, except per share)

 

September 30, 2015

 

June 28, 2015

 

March 29, 2015

 

December 28, 2014

Net sales

 

$

1,308.1 

 

$

1,247.5 

 

$

1,067.0 

 

$

1,067.8 

Gross profit

 

 

467.4 

 

 

458.0 

 

 

374.7 

 

 

370.2 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

26.4 

 

 

44.9 

 

 

27.8 

 

 

49.8 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

0.44 

 

$

0.79 

 

$

0.52 

 

$

0.94 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

0.44 

 

$

0.79 

 

$

0.52 

 

$

0.94 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

 

Quarter Ended

2016 (in millions)

 

September 30, 2016

 

July 3, 2016

 

April 3, 2016

 

January 3, 2016

Net sales

 

$

1,249.8 

 

$

1,361.5 

 

$

1,209.6 

 

$

1,218.8 

Gross profit

 

 

485.8 

 

 

530.6 

 

 

462.8 

 

 

440.7 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

88.9 

 

 

105.1 

 

 

82.5 

 

 

75.4 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SB/RH Holdings, LLC

 

Quarter Ended

2015 (in millions)

 

September 30, 2015

 

June 28, 2015

 

March 29, 2015

 

December 28, 2014

Net sales

 

$

1,308.1 

 

$

1,247.5 

 

$

1,067.0 

 

$

1,067.8 

Gross profit

 

 

467.4 

 

 

458.0 

 

 

374.7 

 

 

370.2 

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

28.4 

 

 

46.6 

 

 

29.6 

 

 

50.8 

As previously discussed in Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies and Practices”, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09. The Company had elected to early adopt the ASU during the quarter ended July 3, 2016 effective as if adopted the first day of the fiscal year, October 1, 2015. The adoption of the new standard impacted our previously reported quarterly results for the recognition of excess tax benefits in our provision for income taxes rather than paid in capital. Due to the valuation allowance on deferred taxes, there was no impact to our quarterly results for the quarter ended January 3, 2016. The following summarizes the impact to the quarter ended April 3, 2016:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Quarter Ended April 3, 2016

SBH (in millions, except per share)

 

As Reported

 

Adjustment

 

As Adjusted

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

75.2 

 

 

17.4 

 

 

92.6 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

1.27 

 

$

0.29 

 

$

1.56 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

1.26 

 

$

0.29 

 

$

1.55 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Quarter Ended April 3, 2016

SB/RH (in millions)

 

As Reported

 

Adjustment

 

As Adjusted

Net income attributable to controlling interest

 

 

72.1 

 

 

10.4 

 

 

82.5 

121


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SPECTRUM BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.

By:

/s/    David R. LumleyAndreas Rouvé

David R. Lumley

Andreas Rouvé

Chief Executive Officer and Director

DATE: November 27, 2013

17, 2016 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the above-stated date.

Signature

Title

SignatureTitle

/s/    David R. Lumley

David R. Lumley
Andreas Rouvé

Andreas Rouvé

Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/    AnthonyDouglas L. Genito  

AnthonyMartin

Douglas L. Genito

Martin

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Chief Accounting Officer


(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/    David M. Maura

David M. Maura

Chairman of the Board


/s/    Kenneth C. Ambrecht

Kenneth C. Ambrecht

Director


/s/    Eugene I. Davis

Eugene I. Davis

Director


/s/    Norman S. Matthews

Norman S. Matthews

Director


/s/    Terry L. Polistina

Terry L. Polistina

Director


/s/    Hugh R. Rovit

Hugh R. Rovit

Director


/s/    Omar Asali

Omar Asali

Director


/s/    Joseph S. Steinberg

Joseph S. Steinberg

Director



113

122



EXHIBIT INDEX


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit 2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among

SB/RH Holdings, Inc., Battery Merger Corp., Grill Merger Corp., Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Russell Hobbs, Inc. dated as of February 9, 2010 (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on February 12, 2010).

Exhibit 2.2Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 1, 2010 by and among SB/RH Holdings, Inc., Battery Merger Corp., Grill Merger Corp., Spectrum Brands, and Russell Hobbs, Inc. (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on March 2, 2010).
Exhibit 2.3Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 26, 2010 by and amongHOLDINGS, LLC

By: Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., Battery Merger Corp., Grill Merger Corp., Spectrum Brands, Inc., and Russell Hobbs, Inc. (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on March 29, 2010).its Sole Member

Exhibit 2.4

By:

Third Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 30, 2010 by and among Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., Battery Merger Corp., Grill Merger Corp., Spectrum Brands, Inc., and Russell Hobbs, Inc. (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on May 3, 2010).

/s/    Andreas Rouvé

Andreas Rouvé

Chief Executive Officer and Director

DATE: November 17, 2016 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Sole Member of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the above-stated date.

Signature

Title

/s/    Andreas Rouvé

Andreas Rouvé

Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/    Douglas L. Martin

Douglas L. Martin

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/    David M. Maura

David M. Maura

Chairman of the Board

/s/    Kenneth C. Ambrecht

Kenneth C. Ambrecht

Director

/s/    Eugene I. Davis

Eugene I. Davis

Director

/s/    Norman S. Matthews

Norman S. Matthews

Director

/s/    Terry L. Polistina

Terry L. Polistina

Director

/s/    Hugh R. Rovit

Hugh R. Rovit

Director

/s/    Omar Asali

Omar Asali

Director

/s/    Joseph S. Steinberg

Joseph S. Steinberg

Director

123


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 2.52.1

Acquisition Agreement, dated October 8, 2012, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., (filed by incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on October 12, 2012)2012 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 2.2

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 28, 2015 between Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., Armored AutoGroup Parent Inc., Ignite Merger Sub, Inc. and Avista Capital Partners II GP, LLC, as representative for the shareholders and optionholders of Armored AutoGroup Parent Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on April 29, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., effective March 7, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on March 7, 2013)2013 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 3.2

Second Amended and Restated By-Laws of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., effective as of March 7, 2013, as amended by the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective as of July 28, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on March 7, 2013)August 6, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 3.3

Certificate of Formation of SB/RH Holdings, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.29 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on December 3, 2013 (File No. 333-192634)).

Exhibit 3.4

Operating Agreement of SB/RH Holdings, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.30 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on December 3, 2013 (File No. 333-192634)).

Exhibit 4.1

Specimen certificate for shares of common stock (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010)2010 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 4.2

Indenture governing Spectrum Brands, Inc.’s 6.75%6.375% Senior Notes due 2020 dated as of March 20, 2012, among Spectrum Brands, Inc., the guarantors named therein and US Bank National Association, as trustee(filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on May 9, 2012).

Exhibit 4.3Indenture governing the 20206.625% Senior Notes and thedue 2022, Notes, dated as of November 16, 2012, between Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp. and US Bank National Association, as trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on November 21, 2012)2012 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 4.3

Exhibit 10.12009

Indenture governing Spectrum Brands, Inc. Incentive Plan’s 6.125% Senior Notes due 2024, dated as of December 4, 2014, among Spectrum Brands, Inc., the guarantors named therein and US Bank National Association, as trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on August 31, 2009)December 8, 2014 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 4.4

Exhibit 10.2Registration Rights Agreement,

Indenture governing Spectrum Brands, Inc.’s 5.750% Senior Notes due 2025, dated as of November 16, 2012 by andMay 20, 2015, among Spectrum Brands, Escrow Corp.Inc., the guarantors named therein and the investors listed on the signature pages thereto, with respect to the 2020 Notes and the 2022 NotesUS Bank National Association, as trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 21, 2012).

Exhibit 10.3Form of Spectrum Brands, Inc. Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Incentive Plan (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.24.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on October 28, 2009)May 20, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 4.5

Indenture governing Spectrum Brands, Inc.’s 4.000% Senior Notes due 2026, dated as of September 20, 2016, among Spectrum Brands, Inc., the guarantors named therein, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, Elavon Financial Services DAC, UK Branch, as paying agent and Elavon Financial Services DAC, as registrar and transfer agent (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on December 8, 2014 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.410.1

Stockholder Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2010, by and among Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd., Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Funds, L.P., Global Opportunities Breakaway Ltd., and SB/RH Holdings, Inc.LLC (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on February 12, 2010)2010 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 10.2


114


Exhibit 10.5

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2010, by and among Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd., Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P., Global Opportunities Breakaway Ltd., Avenue International Master, L.P., Avenue Investments, L.P., Avenue Special Situations Fund IV, L.P., Avenue Special Situations Fund V, L.P. and Avenue-CDP Global Opportunities Fund, L.P. (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on March 29, 2010)2010 (File No. 333-165769)).

Exhibit 10.3

Exhibit 10.6Credit

Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 17, 2012,as of May 20, 2015, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc., Spectrum Brands Canada, Inc., SB/RH Holdings, LLC, the lendersguarantors party thereto and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc and Barclays Bank PLC, as joint bookrunners and joint lead arrangers, Barclays Bank PLC, as syndication agent, and Jefferies Group, Inc., Suntrust Bank and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD., as co-documentation agentsthe investors listed on the signature pages thereto, with respect to the 5.750% Notes (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.410.1 to the AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on February 8, 2013)May 20, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

124


Exhibit 10.4

Exhibit 10.7Amendment No. 1 to

Credit Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2013,June 23, 2015, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc., as Lead Borrower, Spectrum Brands Canada, Inc., as Canadian Borrower, SB/RH Holdings, LLC, the Lenders party thereto and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto from time to time (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on June 23, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.5

First Amendment dated as of October 6, 2016 (to the Credit Agreement dated as of June 23, 2015), by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc., SB/RH Holdings, LLC, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-k8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on September 4, 2013)October 6, 2016 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.6

Exhibit 10.8New Term Loan Commitment Agreement No. 1 dated August 13, 2013 among Spectrum Brands, SB/RH Holdings, LLC, the lenders party thereto, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent (filed by incorporation reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-k filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on September 4, 2013).
Exhibit 10.9

Security Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2010,23, 2015, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc., SB/RH Holdings, LLC, the other grantorssubsidiary guarantors party thereto from time to time and Wells FargoDeutsche Bank National Association,AG New York Branch, as collateral trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 18, 2010).

Exhibit 10.10Security Agreement Supplement dated as of December 13, 2010, by and among Seed Resources, L.L.C. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on December 14, 2010).
Exhibit 10.11Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 16, 2010, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc. and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1610.2 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on August 18, 2010)June 23, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.7

Exhibit 10.12Second Amendment to

Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2011, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc. and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on May 12, 2011).

Exhibit 10.13Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2011, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc. and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on May 12, 2011).
Exhibit 10.14Fourth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2012, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc. and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 7, 2012).
Exhibit 10.15Sixth Amendment to its Loan and Security Agreement,Guaranty, dated as of June 16, 2010, with23, 2015, by and among SB/RH Holdings, Bank of America, as collateral agent and administrative agent, certain subsidiaries of Spectrum Brands and lendersLLC, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto from time to time and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-k8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on September 4, 2013)June 23, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.8+

Exhibit 10.16Joinder Agreement to Loan and Security Agreement and Other Loan Documents dated as of December 13, 2010, by and among Seed Resources, L.L.C., Spectrum Brands, Inc., Russell Hobbs, Inc., the subsidiaries of Spectrum Brands, Inc. party to the Loan and Security Agreement as borrowers, SB/RH Holdings, LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on December 14, 2010).

115


Exhibit 10.17Collateral Trust Agreement dated as of June 16, 2010, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc., SB/RH Holdings, LLC, the other grantors party thereto, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 18, 2010).
Exhibit 10.18Intercreditor Agreement dated as of June 16, 2010, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc., SB/RH Holdings, LLC, the other grantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as ABL agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as term/notes agent (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 18, 2010).
Exhibit 10.19Joinder and Supplement to Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 13, 2010, by and among Seed Resources, L.L.C., Spectrum Brands, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent and administrative agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent and trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on December 14, 2010).
Exhibit 10.20Joinder and Supplement to Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 17, 2012, by and among ROV International Holdings LLC, Kwikset Corporation, Price Pfister, Inc., National Manufacturing Co., National Manufacturing Mexico A LLC, National Manufacturing Mexico B LLC, Weiser Lock Corporation, Baldwin Hardware Corporation, Spectrum Brands, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent and administrative agent, and Wells Fargo, National Association as collateral agent and trustee*
Exhibit 10.21Trademark Security Agreement dated as of June 16, 2010, by and among the loan parties party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 18, 2010).
Exhibit 10.22Copyright Security Agreement dated as of June 16, 2010, by and among the loan parties party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 18, 2010).
Exhibit 10.23Patent Security Agreement dated as of June 16, 2010, by and among the loan parties party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral trustee (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 18, 2010).
Exhibit 10.24

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, entered into as of August 11, 2010, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc., Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and David R. Lumley (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on August 17, 2010)2010(File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.9+

Exhibit 10.25

First Amendment, dated as of November 16, 2010, to the Employment Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2010, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc., Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and David R. Lumley (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on November 22, 2010)2010 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.10+

Exhibit 10.26

Retention Agreement, entered into as of August 11, 2010,April 29, 2014, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Anthony Genito (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.210.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on August 17, 2010)May 5, 2014 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.11+

Exhibit 10.27

Employment Agreement, effective June 9, 2008, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Anthony L. Genito (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2008, filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 8, 2008)2008 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 10.12+

Exhibit 10.28

Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of February 24, 2009, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Anthony L. Genito (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on December 29, 2009)2009 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 10.13+

Exhibit 10.29

Description of Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of August 28, 2009, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Anthony L. Genito (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on December 29, 2009)2009 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 10.14+

Exhibit 10.30

Third Amendment, dated as of November 16, 2010, to the Employment Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2008, by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Anthony L. Genito (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on November 22, 2010)2010 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.15+


116


Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2014 between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Douglas L. Martin (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on September 2, 2014 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.16+

Exhibit 10.31

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Award Plan (formerly known as the Russell Hobbs, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Award Plan) (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on June 16, 2010)2010 (File No. 333-167574)).

Exhibit 10.17+

2009 Spectrum Brands, Inc. Incentive Plan (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on August 31, 2009 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 10.3210.18+

Form of Spectrum Brands, Inc. Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Incentive Plan (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on October 28, 2009 (File No. 001-13615)).

125


Exhibit 10.19+

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Award Plan, as amended on January 28, 2014 (filed by incorporation by reference to Annex AExhibit 99.1 to the Proxy StatementCurrent Report on Schedule 14AForm 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on January 28, 2011)February 3, 2014 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.20+

Exhibit 10.33

Severance Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2012, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Nathan E. Fagre (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on November 21, 2012)2012 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 10.21+

Exhibit 10.34Separation

Registered Director’s Agreement, dated December 28, 2012as of August 27, 2007, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc.Andreas Rouve and John HeilRayovac Europe GmbH, as amended on October 1, 2007 (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.199.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on January 3, 2012)February 11, 2014 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.22+

Exhibit 10.35

Separation Agreement dated September 16, 2013 between Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Terry Polistina (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands, Inc. on September 20, 2013)2013 (File No. 001-13615)).

Exhibit 10.23+

Transition Employment Agreement dated January 8, 2015, by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc., Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and David R. Lumley (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on February 5, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.24+

Employment Agreement, dated March 16, 2015, among Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., Spectrum Brands, Inc. and Andreas Rouve (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on May 1, 2015 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 10.25+

Employment Agreement dated January 20, 2016 by and among Spectrum Brands, Inc. and David M. Maura (filed by incorporation by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC by Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. on January 21, 2016 (File No. 001-34757)).

Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant.*

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.*

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.*

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.*

Exhibit 31.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SB/RH Holdings, LLC *

Exhibit 31.4

Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SB/RH Holdings, LLC *

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.*

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.*

Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SB/RH Holdings, LLC *

101.INS

Exhibit 32.4

XBRL Instance Document*

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SB/RH Holdings, LLC *

101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document**
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**


  ______________________________

_____________________________

*     Filed herewith

**  In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be deemed to be furnished and not filed.

*** Filed herewith, with respect to Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. SB/RH Holdings, LLC meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and has therefore omitted the list of subsidiaries exhibit otherwise required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K as allowed under General Instruction I(2)(b).

+   Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

126

**In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be deemed to be “furnished” and not “filed.”




117