September 30,
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family:
Originated $ 3,959,232
55.1 % $ 4,005,615
57.6 % $ 4,010,424
60.6 % $ 3,978,342
63.8 % $ 4,054,395
67.9 %
Correspondent purchased 2,445,311
34.0
2,206,072
31.7
1,846,210
27.9
1,431,745
23.0
1,044,127
17.5
Bulk purchased 351,705
4.9
416,653
6.0
485,682
7.3
561,890
9.0
644,484
10.8
Construction 30,647
0.4
39,430
0.6
29,552
0.4
33,378
0.5
27,649
0.5
Total 6,786,895
94.4
6,667,770
95.9
6,371,868
96.2
6,005,355
96.3
5,770,655
96.7
Commercial:
Permanent 183,030
2.6
110,768
1.6
109,314
1.6
75,677
1.2
50,358
0.8
Construction 86,952
1.2
43,375
0.6
11,523
0.2
21,465
0.3
7,328
0.1
Total 269,982
3.8
154,143
2.2
120,837
1.8
97,142
1.5
57,686
0.9
Total real estate loans 7,056,877
98.2
6,821,913
98.1
6,492,705
98.0
6,102,497
97.8
5,828,341
97.6

Consumer loans:
Home equity 122,066
1.7
123,345
1.8
125,844
1.9
130,484
2.1
135,028
2.3
Other 3,808
0.1
4,264
0.1
4,179
0.1
4,537
0.1
5,623
0.1
Total consumer loans 125,874
1.8
127,609
1.9
130,023
2.0
135,021
2.2
140,651
2.4
Total loans receivable 7,182,751
100.0 % 6,949,522
100.0 % 6,622,728
100.0 % 6,237,518
100.0 % 5,968,992
100.0 %

Less:
ACL 8,398
8,540
9,443
9,227
8,822

Discounts/unearned loan fees 24,962
24,933
24,213
23,687
23,057

Premiums/deferred costs (45,680 ) (41,975 ) (35,955 ) (28,566 ) (21,755 )
Total loans receivable, net $ 7,195,071
$ 6,958,024
$ 6,625,027
$ 6,233,170
$ 5,958,868

The following table presents the contractual maturity of our loan portfolio, along with associated weighted average yields, at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Loans which have adjustable interest rates are shown as maturing in the period during which the contract is due. The table does not reflect the effects of possible prepayments or enforcement of due on sale clauses.


	One- to Four-Family				Commercial				Construction(2)				Home Equity(3)				Other Consumer				Total
	Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Amounts due:
Within one year(1)	$	1,237	4.51	%	$	117,410	4.03	%	$	139,667	4.27	%	$	2,130	5.15	%	$	1,161	3.36	%	$	261,605	4.17	%

After one year:
Over one to two	2,855		4.23		106,369		3.05		384		3.75		412		5.08		971		5.50		110,991		3.11
Over two to three	10,262		3.85		49,650		4.56		—		—		402		5.37		2,220		4.92		62,534		4.46
Over three to five	46,938		3.89		75,892		4.82		—		—		1,346		5.43		3,912		3.99		128,088		4.46
Over five to ten	497,411		3.18		267,221		4.57		—		—		11,201		5.52		1,383		5.81		777,216		3.70
Over ten to fifteen	1,316,691		3.12		64,802		4.66		—		—		42,602		4.41		355		6.06		1,424,450		3.23
After fifteen years	4,371,425		3.57		42,858		4.76		—		—		45,745		4.59		84		5.67		4,460,112		3.59
Total due after one year	6,245,582		3.44		606,792		4.36		384		3.75		101,708		4.64		8,925		4.76		6,963,391		3.54

Totals loans	$	6,246,819	3.44		$	724,202	4.30		$	140,051	4.27		$	103,838	4.65		$	10,086	4.60		7,224,996		3.57

Less:
ACL																					31,527
Discounts/unearned loan fees																					29,190
Premiums/deferred costs																					(38,572)
Total loans receivable, net																					$	7,202,851

(1)Includes demand loans, loans having no stated maturity, and overdraft loans.

(2)Construction loans are presented based upon the estimated term to complete construction. See "One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending - Construction Lending" above for more information regarding our construction-to-permanent loan program.

(3)For home equity loans, including those that do not have a stated maturity date, the maturity date calculated assumes the borrower always makes the required minimum payment. The majority of home equity loans assume a maximum term of 240 months.

Real Estate Consumer
One- to Four-Family Commercial
Construction⁽²⁾

Home Equity⁽³⁾
Other Total
Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield
(Dollars in thousands)
Amounts due:
Within one year⁽¹⁾
$ 2,888
�� 4.63 % $ 10,541
3.26 % $ 42,352
3.61 % $ 2,404
6.29 % $ 406
3.77 % $ 58,591
3.71 %

After one year:
Over one to two 5,296
4.63
2,969
5.25
73,837
3.93
188
6.12
460
6.55
82,750
4.04
Over two to three 6,439
4.28
4,802
3.53
1,410
4.27
668
6.51
1,029
3.81
14,348
4.10
Over three to five 25,062
4.11
11,950
4.49
—
—
1,368
5.49
1,887
3.61
40,267
4.25
Over five to ten 489,718
3.62
60,468
4.17
—
—
10,149
5.96
26
4.86
560,361
3.73
Over ten to fifteen 1,294,619
3.17
43,981
4.51
—
—
46,485
5.36
—
—
1,385,085
3.28
After fifteen years 4,932,226
3.62
48,319
4.40
—
—
60,804
5.26
—
—
5,041,349
3.64
Total due after one year 6,753,360
3.53
172,489
4.34
75,247
3.94
119,662
5.37
3,402
4.08
7,124,160
3.59

Totals loans $ 6,756,248
3.53
$ 183,030
4.28
$ 117,599
3.82
$ 122,066
5.39
$ 3,808
4.04
7,182,751
3.59

Less:
ACL 8,398

Discounts/unearned loan fees 24,962

Premiums/deferred costs (45,680 )
Total loans receivable, net $ 7,195,071


~~(1)~~	~~Includes demand loans, loans having no stated maturity, and overdraft loans.~~


~~(2)~~	Construction loans are presented based upon the estimated term to complete construction. See "One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending - Construction Lending" above for more information regarding our construction-to-permanent loan program.


~~(3)~~	For home equity loans, the maturity date calculated assumes the customer always makes the required minimum payment. The majority of interest-only home equity lines of credit assume a balloon payment of unpaid principal at 120 months. All other home equity lines of credit generally assume a term of 240 months.

The following table presents, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the amount of loans due after September 30, ~~2018,~~2021, and whether these loans have fixed or adjustable interest rates.


	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family	$	5,416,534	$	829,048	$	6,245,582
Commercial	416,303		190,489		606,792
Construction	—		384		384
Consumer loans:
Home equity	14,682		87,026		101,708
Other	6,504		2,421		8,925
Total	$	5,854,023	$	1,109,368	$	6,963,391

Fixed Adjustable Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family $ 5,636,563
$ 1,116,797
$ 6,753,360
Commercial 127,795
44,694
172,489
Construction 74,708
539
75,247
Consumer loans:
Home equity 15,340
104,322
119,662
Other 741
2,661
3,402
Total $ 5,855,147
$ 1,269,013
$ 7,124,160

Asset Quality

The Bank's traditional one- to four-family underwriting guidelines have provided the Bank with generally low delinquencies and low levels of non-performing assets within this loan category compared to national levels. Of particular importance is the complete and full documentation required for each loan the Bank originates, participates in or purchases. Generally, one- to four-family owner occupied loans are currently underwritten according to the "ability to repay" and "qualified mortgage" standards, as issued by the CFPB, with total debt-to-income ratios not exceeding 43% of the borrower's verified income. This allows the Bank to make an informed credit decision based upon a thorough assessment of the borrower's ability to repay the loan.

For one- to four-family loans and consumer loans, when a borrower fails to make a loan payment within 15 days after the due date, a late charge is assessed and a notice is mailed. Collection personnel review all delinquent loan accounts more than 16 days past due. Attempts to contact the borrower occur, ~~by personal letter and, if no response is received, by telephone,~~ with the purpose of establishing repayment ~~arrangements for the borrower to bring the loan current. Repayment arrangements must be approved by a designated bank employee.~~arrangements. For residential mortgage loans serviced by the Bank, beginning at approximately the 31^st day of delinquency, and again at approximately the 50^th day of delinquency, information notices are mailed to borrowers to inform them of the availability of payment assistance programs. ~~Borrowers are encouraged to contact the Bank to initiate the process of reviewing such opportunities.~~ Once a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, assuming a loss mitigation solution is not actively in process, a demand letter is issued requiring the loan be brought current or foreclosure procedures will be implemented. Generally, when a loan becomes 120 days delinquent, and an acceptable repayment plan or loss mitigation solution has neither been established nor is in the process of being negotiated, the loan is forwarded to legal counsel to initiate foreclosure. We also monitor whether borrowers who have filed for bankruptcy are meeting their obligation to pay the mortgage debt in accordance with the terms of the bankruptcy petition.

For purchased one- to four-family loans serviced by a third party, we monitor delinquencies using ~~reports~~data received from the servicers. The reports generally provide total principal and interest due and length of delinquency, and are used to prepare monthly management reports and perform delinquent loan trend analysis. The information from the sub-servicer of our correspondent one- to four-family loans is generally received during the first week of the month while the information from the servicers of our one- to-four family bulk loans is received later in the month. Management also utilizes information from the servicers to monitor property valuations and identify the need to charge-off loan balances.

For commercial ~~real estate~~ loans originated by the Bank, when a ~~borrower fails to make a loan payment within 15 days after the due date, a late notice is mailed. If the~~ loan becomes ~~30 days or more~~ past due, the Bank begins collection efforts, ~~including sending legal notices for payment collection and contacting the borrower~~initially by ~~telephone. The primary purpose of such contact is to notify~~notifying the borrower of the past due payment ~~in case the loan payment was misplaced or lost~~ and attempting to ~~identify any~~determine if there have been changes in the ~~project's income flow~~borrower's financial condition that may affect future loan performance. If it is determined that future loan performance may be adversely affected, the Bank initiates discussions with the borrower regarding plans to ensure cash flow from operations is sufficient to satisfy the debt requirements and meet the loan covenants. Generally, once a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, foreclosure or collection procedures are initiated. For participation loans, the lead bank is responsible for all collection efforts and contact with the borrower. However, if the Bank does not receive an expected payment on a participation loan, the Bank contacts the lead bank to determine the cause of the late payment and to initiate discussions with the lead bank of collection efforts, as necessary. See "Lending Practices and Underwriting Standards – Commercial ~~Real Estate~~ Lending – Monitoring of Risk" for additional information.

In late March 2020, the Bank suspended the initiation of foreclosure proceedings for one- to four-family loans through the end of calendar year 2020. Additionally, the Bank announced loan modification programs to support and provide relief for its borrowers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Generally, loan modifications under these programs ("COVID-19 loan modifications") for one- to four-family loans and consumer loans consist of a three-month payment forbearance of principal, interest and, in some cases, escrow. COVID-19 loan modifications of commercial loans mainly consist of a six-month interest-only payment period. See "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition - Loans Receivable" for additional discussion regarding COVID-19 loan modifications.

Delinquent and non-performing loans and other real estate owned ("OREO")

The following table presents the Company's 30 to 89 day delinquent loans at the dates indicated. Loans subject to payment forbearance under the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program are not reported as delinquent during the forbearance time period. The amounts in the table represent the unpaid principal balance of the loans less related charge-offs. Of the loans 30 to 89 days delinquent at September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015,~~2018, approximately ~~67%~~70%, ~~75%~~67%, and ~~75%~~74%, respectively, were 59 days or less delinquent.


	Loans Delinquent for 30 to 89 Days at September 30,
	2020				2019				2018
	Number	Amount			Number	Amount			Number	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	42	$	3,012		90	$	7,223		129	$	10,647
Correspondent purchased	8	3,123			9	2,721			18	3,803
Bulk purchased	12	2,532			16	3,581			15	3,502
Commercial	2	45			8	826			6	322

Consumer	26	398			42	525			38	533


	90	$	9,110		165	$	14,876		206	$	18,807

Loans 30 to 89 days delinquent
to total loans receivable, net		0.13		%		0.20		%		0.25		%

Loans Delinquent for 30 to 89 Days at September 30,
2017 2016 2015
Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated 129 $ 13,257
143 $ 13,593
158 $ 16,955
Correspondent purchased 8 1,827
9 3,329
8 2,344
Bulk purchased 22 3,194
21 5,008
32 7,259
Consumer:
Home equity 30 467
36 635
32 703
Other 5 33
5 62
11 17
194 $ 18,778
214 $ 22,627
241 $ 27,278

Loans 30 to 89 days delinquent
to total loans receivable, net 0.26 % 0.33 % 0.41 %

The table below presents the Company's non-performing loans and OREO at the dates indicated. The amounts in the table represent the unpaid principal balance of the loans less related charge-offs. Non-performing loans are loans that are 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure and other loans required to be reported as nonaccrual pursuant to accounting and/or regulatory reporting requirements and/or internal policies, even if the loans are current. At all dates presented, there were no loans 90 or more days delinquent that were still accruing interest. Non-performing assets include non-performing loans and OREO. OREO primarily includes assets acquired in settlement of loans. Over the past 12 months, one- to four-family OREO properties acquired in settlement of one- to four-family loans were owned by the Bank, on average, for approximately ~~seven~~four months before the properties were sold.


	September 30,
	2020				2019				2018				2017				2016
	Number	Amount			Number	Amount			Number	Amount			Number	Amount			Number	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans 90 or More Days Delinquent or in Foreclosure:
One- to four-family:
Originated	51	$	4,362		44	$	3,268		67	$	5,040		67	$	5,515		73	$	8,190
Correspondent purchased	6	2,397			4	1,008			1	449			1	91			3	985
Bulk purchased	12	2,903			6	1,465			11	3,045			13	3,371			28	7,323
Commercial	5	1,360			4	170			—	—			—	—			—	—
Consumer	14	304			25	362			30	569			22	410			31	529
	88	11,326			83	6,273			109	9,103			103	9,387			135	17,027

Loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure
as a percentage of total loans		0.16		%		0.08		%		0.12		%		0.13		%		0.24		%

Nonaccrual loans less than 90 Days Delinquent:(1)
One- to four-family:
Originated	9	$	691		16	$	1,183		19	$	1,482		50	$	4,567		70	$	8,956
Correspondent purchased	—	—			—	—			2	396			8	1,690			9	2,786
Bulk purchased	—	—			1	65			—	—			4	846			1	31
Commercial	3	464			1	7			—	—			—	—			—	—
Consumer	1	9			2	35			2	9			7	113			12	328
	13	1,164			20	1,290			23	1,887			69	7,216			92	12,101
Total non-performing loans	101	12,490			103	7,563			132	10,990			172	16,603			227	29,128

Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans		0.17		%		0.10		%		0.15		%		0.23		%		0.42		%

September 30,
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans 90 or More Days Delinquent or in Foreclosure:
One- to four-family:
Originated 67
$ 5,515
73
$ 8,190
66
$ 6,728
82
$ 7,880
101
$ 8,579
Correspondent purchased 1
91
3
985
1
394
2
709
5
812
Bulk purchased 13
3,371
28
7,323
36
8,898
28
7,120
34
9,608
Consumer:
Home equity 21
406
26
520
24
497
25
397
29
485
Other 1
4
5
9
4
12
4
13
4
5
103
9,387
135
17,027
131
16,529
141
16,119
173
19,489

Loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure
as a percentage of total loans 0.13 % 0.24 % 0.25 % 0.26 % 0.33 %

Nonaccrual loans less than 90 Days Delinquent:⁽¹⁾

One- to four-family:
Originated 50
$ 4,567
70
$ 8,956
77
$ 9,004
67
$ 7,473
57
$ 5,833
Correspondent purchased 8
1,690
9
2,786
1
25
4
553
2
740
Bulk purchased 4
846
1
31
1
82
5
724
2
280
Consumer:
Home equity 7
113
12
328
12
295
2
45
6
101
Other —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
69
7,216
92
12,101
91
9,406
78
8,795
67
6,954
Total non-performing loans 172
16,603
227
29,128
222
25,935
219
24,914
240
26,443

Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans 0.23 % 0.42 % 0.39 % 0.40 % 0.44 %


	September 30,
	2020				2019				2018				2017				2016
	Number	Amount			Number	Amount			Number	Amount			Number	Amount			Number	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
OREO:
One- to four-family:
Originated(2)	4	$	183		8	$	745		8	$	843		4	$	58		12	$	692
Correspondent purchased	—	—			—	—			—	—			—	—			1	499
Bulk purchased	—	—			—	—			1	454			5	1,279			4	1,265
Commercial	—	—			1	600			1	600			—	—			—	—
Consumer	—	—			—	—			—	—			1	67			—	—
Other	—	—			—	—			—	—			—	—			1	1,278
	4	183			9	1,345			10	1,897			10	1,404			18	3,734
Total non-performing assets	105	$	12,673		112	$	8,908		142	$	12,887		182	$	18,007		245	$	32,862

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets		0.13		%		0.10		%		0.14		%		0.20		%		0.35		%

(1)Includes loans required to be reported as nonaccrual pursuant to accounting and/or regulatory reporting requirements and/or internal policies, even if the loans are current. The decrease in the balance of these loans at September 30, 2017 compared to September 30, 2016 was due to fewer loans being classified as troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") as a result of management refining its methodology for assessing whether a loan modification qualifies as a TDR.

September 30,
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
OREO:
One- to four-family:
Originated⁽²⁾
4
$ 58
12
$ 692
29
$ 1,752
25
$ 2,040
28
$ 2,074
Correspondent purchased —
—
1
499
1
499
1
179
2
71
Bulk purchased 5
1,279
4
1,265
2
796
2
575
4
380
Consumer:
Home equity 1
67
—
—
1
8
—
—
2
57
Other⁽³⁾
—
—
1
1,278
1
1,278
1
1,300
1
1,300
10
1,404
18
3,734
34
4,333
29
4,094
37
3,882
Total non-performing assets 182
$ 18,007
245
$ 32,862
256
$ 30,268
248
$ 29,008
277
$ 30,325

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets 0.20 % 0.35 % 0.31 % 0.29 % 0.33 %
(2)Real estate-related consumer loans where we also hold the first mortgage are included in the one- to four-family category as the underlying collateral is one- to four-family property.

~~(1)~~

Represents loans required to be reported as nonaccrual pursuant to regulatory reporting requirements, even if the loans are current. The decrease in the balance of these loans at September 30, 2017 compared to September 30, 2016 was due to fewer loans being classified as troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") as a result of management refining its methodology for assessing whether a loan modification qualifies as a TDR. At September 30, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013, this amount was comprised of $1.8 million, $2.3 million, $2.2 million, $1.1 million, and $1.1 million, respectively, of loans that were 30 to 89 days delinquent and were reported as such, and $5.4 million, $9.8 million, $7.2 million, $7.7 million, and $5.9 million, respectively, of loans that were current.


~~(2)~~	~~Real estate-related consumer loans where we also hold the first mortgage are included in the one- to four-family category as the underlying collateral is one- to four-family property.~~


~~(3)~~	~~Represents a single property the Bank purchased for a potential branch site. The Bank sold the property during fiscal year 2017.~~

The amount of interest income on nonaccrual loans and TDRs as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 included in interest income was ~~$1.6~~$1.0 million for the year ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. The amount of additional interest income that would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans and TDRs as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, if they had performed in accordance with their original terms, was ~~$165~~$123 thousand for the year ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

The following table presents the states where the properties securing ~~one~~five percent or more of the total amount of our one- to four-family loans are located and the corresponding balance of loans 30 to 89 days delinquent, 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure, and weighted average LTV ratios for loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. The LTV ratios were based on the current loan balance and either the lesser of the purchase price or original appraisal, or the most recent Bank appraisal, if available. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, potential losses, after taking into consideration anticipated PMI proceeds and estimated selling costs, have been charged-off.


					Loans 30 to 89				Loans 90 or More Days Delinquent
	One- to Four-Family				Days Delinquent				or in Foreclosure
State	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		LTV
	(Dollars in thousands)
Kansas	$	3,541,606	56.7	%	$	2,547	29.4	%	$	4,457	46.1	%	67	%
Missouri	1,089,197		17.4		1,683		19.4		210		2.2		40
Texas	698,017		11.2		1,553		17.9		437		4.5		44
Other states	917,999		14.7		2,884		33.3		4,558		47.2		60



	$	6,246,819	100.0	%	$	8,667	100.0	%	$	9,662	100.0	%	62

Loans 30 to 89 Loans 90 or More Days Delinquent
One- to Four-Family Days Delinquent or in Foreclosure
State Amount % of Total Amount % of Total Amount % of Total LTV
(Dollars in thousands)
Kansas $ 3,670,347
54.3 % $ 10,673
58.4 % $ 5,297
59.0 % 66 %
Missouri 1,242,818
18.4
3,721
20.4
827
9.2
51
Texas 671,460
9.9
1,134
6.2
—
—
n/a
Tennessee 217,594
3.2
—
—
—
—
n/a
California 216,558
3.2
—
—
—
—
n/a
Alabama 105,854
1.6
155
0.8
—
—
n/a
Pennsylvania 100,587
1.5
—
—
—
—
n/a
Georgia 88,710
1.3
409
2.2
—
—
n/a
Oklahoma 67,462
1.0
—
—
—
—
n/a
North Carolina 66,515
1.0
37
0.2
122
1.4
87
Other states 308,343
4.6
2,149
11.8
2,731
30.4
65
$ 6,756,248
100.0 % $ 18,278
100.0 % $ 8,977
100.0 % 65

Classified Assets. In accordance with the Bank's asset classification policy, management regularly reviews the problem assets in the Bank's portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 5. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses" for asset classification definitions.

The following table sets forth the recorded investment in assets, classified as either special mention or substandard, as of September 30, 2020. At September 30, 2020, there were no loans classified as doubtful, and all loans classified as loss were fully charged-off.


	Special Mention			Substandard
	Number	Amount		Number	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	82	$	9,249	196	$	15,729
Correspondent purchased	6	2,076		17	4,512
Bulk purchased	—	—		25	5,319
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	5	50,957		9	3,541
Commercial and industrial	7	1,040		3	1,368
Consumer	14	331		35	589


Total loans	114	63,653		285	31,058

OREO:
One- to four-family:
Originated	—	—		4	183




Total OREO	—	—		4	183



Total classified assets	114	$	63,653	289	$	31,241

Troubled Debt Restructurings. For borrowers experiencing financial difficulties, the Bank may grant a concession to the borrower, resulting in a TDR. Such concessions generally involve extensions of loan maturity dates, the granting of periods during which ~~the~~reduced payment ~~of only interest and escrow is~~amounts are required, reductions in interest rates, ~~and~~and/or loans that have been discharged under Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings where the borrower has not reaffirmed the debt. The Bank does not forgive principal or interest, nor does it commit to lend additional funds, except for situations generally involving the capitalization of delinquent interest and/or escrow on one- to four-family and consumer loans, not to exceed the original loan balance, to these borrowers. For commercial loans, the Bank does not forgive principal or interest or commit to lend additional funds unless the borrower provides additional collateral or other enhancements to improve credit quality. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 4.5. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses" for additional information related to TDRs.

As previously noted, in late March 2020, the Bank announced COVID-19 loan modification programs to support and provide relief for its borrowers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company has followed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act and interagency guidance from the federal banking agencies when determining if a borrower's modification is subject to TDR classification.

The following table presents the Company's TDRs, based on accrual status, at the dates indicated.


	September 30,
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Accruing TDRs	$	13,205	$	14,892	$	20,216	$	27,383	$	23,177
Nonaccrual TDRs(1)	3,394		2,958		4,652		11,742		18,725
Total TDRs	$	16,599	$	17,850	$	24,868	$	39,125	$	41,902

September 30,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Accruing TDRs $ 27,383
$ 23,177
$ 24,331
$ 24,636
$ 37,074
Nonaccrual TDRs⁽¹⁾
11,742
18,725
15,511
13,370
12,426
Total TDRs $ 39,125
$ 41,902
$ 39,842
$ 38,006
$ 49,500


~~(1)~~	~~Nonaccrual TDRs are included in the non-performing loan table above.~~

(1)Nonaccrual TDRs are included in the non-performing loan table above and are classified as substandard.

Impaired Loans.A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized in the period collected unless the ultimate collection of principal is considered doubtful. The unpaid principal balance of loans reported as impaired at September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015~~2018 was ~~$44.4~~$23.1 million, ~~$58.9~~$23.4 million, and ~~$57.2~~$29.9 million, respectively. Included in the impaired loan balance at September 30, 2020 were $22.9 million of loans classified as either special mention or substandard.

See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and

Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 4.5. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses" for additional information related to impaired loans.

~~Classified Assets.~~ In accordance with the Bank's asset classification policy, management regularly reviews the problem assets in the Bank's portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 4. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses" for asset classification definitions.

The following table sets forth the recorded investment in assets, classified as either special mention or substandard, as of September 30, 2017. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 4. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses" for information regarding asset classification definitions. At September 30, 2017, there were no loans classified as doubtful, and all loans classified as loss were fully charged-off.

Special Mention Substandard
Number Amount Number Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated 50
$ 7,031
314
$ 30,059
Correspondent purchased 2
261
19
3,800
Bulk purchased —
—
33
8,005
Consumer Loans:
Home equity 2
9
62
1,032
Other —
—
1
4
Total loans 54
7,301
429
42,900

OREO:
Originated —
—
5
125
Correspondent purchased —
—
—
—
Bulk purchased —
—
5
1,279
Other —
—
—
—
Total OREO —
—
10
1,404

Trust preferred securities ("TRUPs") —
—
1
2,051
Total classified assets 54
$ 7,301
440
$ 46,355

Allowance for credit losses and ~~Provision~~provision for credit losses.Management maintains an ACL to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio based on ~~ongoing~~ quarterly assessments of the loan portfolio. The ACL is maintained through provisions for credit losses which are either charged to or credited to income. Our ACL methodology considers a number of factors including the trend and composition of delinquent loans, trends in foreclosed property and short sale transactions and charge-off activity, the current status and trends of local and national employment levels, trends and current conditions in the real estate and housing markets, loan portfolio growth and concentrations, industry and peer charge-off information, and certain ACL ratios. For our commercial real estate portfolio, we also consider qualitative factors such as geographic locations, property types, tenant brand name, borrowing relationships, and lending relationships in the case of participation loans, among other factors. See "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses" and "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for a full discussion of our ACL methodology. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 4.5. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses" for additional information on the ACL.

Each quarter a formula analysis model is prepared which segregates the loan portfolio into categories based on certain risk characteristics. Historical loss and qualitative factors are applied to each loan category in the formula analysis model. The factors are reviewed by management quarterly to assess whether they adequately cover probable and estimable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.

During the current fiscal year, management increased the historical loss and qualitative factors applied in the formula analysis model for all loan categories and added a COVID-19 qualitative factor to the Bank's commercial loan portfolio. The increase in the factors and addition of the new qualitative factor was in response to the deterioration of economic conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. When determining the appropriate historical loss and qualitative factors to apply in the formula analysis model, management considered such items as: national and state unemployment and unemployment benefit claim information, amount and timing of governmental financial assistance, the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification programs, consumer spending information, industries most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and a loan analysis completed by the commercial lending team.

As of September 30, 2020, unemployment benefit claims continued to be at high levels, but not as high as the late March 2020/early April 2020 timeframe. Individuals that were unemployed benefited from the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation Program ("FPUC") which the CARES Act created. FPUC provided an additional $600 per week to individuals collecting regular unemployment compensation. The FPUC expired in late July 2020. There were other unemployment compensation benefits created under the CARES Act which benefited individuals that exhausted their regular unemployment insurance benefits and that are generally not eligible for regular unemployment compensation, like self-employed individuals. In early August 2020, President Trump signed an executive memorandum authorizing the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide $300 per week in extra unemployment benefits for six weeks, which started on August 1, 2020. The majority of the financial assistance provided by the federal government, which may be masking the Bank's actual credit exposure, tapered off significantly by September 30, 2020. In late March 2020, the Bank ~~did~~began offering

a COVID-19 loan modification program for one- to four-family and consumer loans. While the intention of the COVID-19 loan modification program was to keep customers current on their payments and therefore in their homes during the worst of the economic downturn, the program could also be masking the Bank's actual credit exposure on these loans. See "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition" for additional information regarding COVID-19 loan modifications.

Many of the stay-at-home orders issued in March and April 2020 were lifted by September 30, 2020, resulting in some people returning to work, but not ~~record a provision for~~at the same level as prior to March 2020. Several companies are still requiring their employees to work from home and limit business travel and several colleges and schools are electing remote and/or hybrid learning. The residents of senior housing facilities continue to be generally disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Consumer spending has continued to gradually rebound, but generally not in the travel, lodging, and entertainment industries. The Bank's commercial lending team analyzed the Bank's largest commercial lending relationships through September 30, 2020. Approximately 91% of all commercial loans, excluding PPP loans, were evaluated. The commercial lending team primarily focused on the lending relationships considered most at risk of short-term operational cash flow issues and/or collateral concerns, which had an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $201.2 million at September 30, 2020, and was primarily in the following categories: senior housing facilities, hotels, retail buildings, office buildings and single use buildings. These loan categories were among the categories with the highest usage of the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program. We believe the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program has been very beneficial to the majority of the Bank's commercial borrowers that took advantage of the program; however, as is the case with one- to four-family loans, the modifications may be masking the Bank's actual credit ~~losses~~exposure. The commercial lending team also considered the largest credits in the industries most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic: senior housing, hotel, retail building, office building and single use buildings. The weighted average LTV ratios based on the aggregate unpaid principal balances of senior housing, hotel, retail building, office building, and single use building loans were 69%, 58%, 67%, 75%, and 69%, respectively, at September 30, 2020. In most cases, the most recent appraisal was obtained at the time of origination.

There was no significant deterioration in credit quality indicators, such as loan delinquencies, asset classification and credit scores, during the current fiscal ~~year, compared to a negative provision for~~year; however, as noted above, the financial assistance provided by the federal government and our COVID-19 loan modifications may be masking our actual credit ~~losses of $750 thousand during the prior fiscal year. Based on management's assessment of the ACL formula analysis model and several other factors, management determined that no provision for~~exposure which could result in worsening credit ~~losses was necessary~~quality indicators in the ~~current fiscal year. Net charge-offs were $142 thousand during the current fiscal year and $153 thousand during the prior fiscal year. At September 30, 2017, loans~~coming months. Loans 30 to 89 days delinquent were ~~0.26%~~0.13% of total loans at September 30, 2020 and 0.20% of total loans at September 30, 2019. Loans 90 days or more ~~days~~ delinquent or in foreclosure were ~~0.13%~~0.16% of total ~~loans.~~loans at September 30, 2020 and 0.08% of total loans at September 30, 2019. Loans classified as special mention were $63.7 million at September 30, 2020 compared to $69.8 million at September 30, 2019. Loans classified as substandard were $31.1 million at September 30, 2020 compared to $30.1 million at September 30, 2019. The weighted average credit score for our one- to four-family loan portfolio was 768 at September 30, 2020 compared to 767 at September 30, 2019. We completed a credit score update from a nationally recognized consumer rating agency during September of 2020 and 2019.

The majority of the provision for credit losses recorded in the current fiscal year was to increase the ACL to account for the increase in the factors and the addition of the new qualitative factor in the formula analysis model as a result of management's assessment of the inherent losses in the loan portfolio due to the deterioration of economic conditions. Management will continue to closely monitor economic conditions and will work with borrowers as necessary to assist them through this challenging economic climate. If economic conditions worsen or do not improve in the near term, and if future government programs, if any, do not provide adequate relief to borrowers, it is possible the Bank's ACL will need to increase in future periods. Management seeks to apply the ACL methodology in a consistent manner; however, the methodology may be modified in response to changing conditions, such as was the case during the current fiscal year. Although management believes the ACL was at a level adequate to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio at September 30, 2020, the level of the ACL remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term changes.

Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments became effective for the Company on October 1, 2020. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information.

The following table presents ACL activity and related ratios at the dates and for the periods indicated. ~~Using~~


	Year Ended September 30,
	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	9,226		$	8,463		$	8,398		$	8,540		$	9,443
Charge-offs:
One- to four-family:
Originated	(64)			(75)			(136)			(72)			(200)
Correspondent	—			—			(128)			—			—
Bulk purchased	—			(26)			—			(216)			(342)

Total	(64)			(101)			(264)			(288)			(542)
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	(325)			—			—			—			—
Commercial and industrial	(24)			(124)			—			—			—

Total	(349)			(124)			—			—			—
Consumer:
Home equity	(10)			(28)			(32)			(51)			(83)
Other	(20)			(9)			(6)			(9)			(5)
Total	(30)			(37)			(38)			(60)			(88)
Total charge-offs	(443)			(262)			(302)			(348)			(630)
Recoveries:
One- to four-family:
Originated	41			22			144			4			77

Bulk purchased	265			106			196			165			374

Total	306			128			340			169			451
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	110			22			—			—			—
Commercial and industrial	—			2			—			—			—
Construction	—			25			—			—			—
Total	110			49			—			—			—
Consumer:
Home equity	23			80			22			26			25
Other	5			18			5			11			1
Total	28			98			27			37			26
Total recoveries	444			275			367			206			477
Net recoveries (charge-offs)	1			13			65			(142)			(153)
Provision for credit losses	22,300			750			—			—			(750)
Balance at end of period	$	31,527		$	9,226		$	8,463		$	8,398		$	8,540

Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to
average loans outstanding during the period	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%

Ratio of net (recoveries) charge-offs during the
period to average non-performing assets	(0.01)			(0.12)			(0.42)			0.56			0.48

ACL to non-performing loans at end of period	252.42			121.99			77.01			50.58			29.32

ACL to loans receivable, net at end of period	0.44			0.12			0.11			0.12			0.12

ACL to net charge-offs	N/M(1)			N/M(1)			N/M(1)			58.9x			55.8x

(1)This ratio is not presented for the ~~Bank's annualized net historical~~time period noted due to loan ~~losses from~~recoveries exceeding loan charge-offs during the ~~Bank's ACL formula analysis model over the past five years, the Bank would have approximately 12 years of net loan loss coverage based on the ACL balance at September 30, 2017.~~period.

Year Ended September 30,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period $ 8,540
$ 9,443
$ 9,227
$ 8,822
$ 11,100
Charge-offs:
One- to four-family:
Originated (72 ) (200 ) (424 ) (284 ) (624 )
Correspondent —
—
(11 ) (96 ) (13 )
Bulk purchased (216 ) (342 ) (228 ) (653 ) (761 )
Total (288 ) (542 ) (663 ) (1,033 ) (1,398 )
Consumer:
Home equity (51 ) (83 ) (29 ) (103 ) (252 )
Other (9 ) (5 ) (43 ) (6 ) (7 )
Total (60 ) (88 ) (72 ) (109 ) (259 )
Total charge-offs (348 ) (630 ) (735 ) (1,142 ) (1,657 )
Recoveries:
One- to four-family:
Originated 4
77
56
1
14
Correspondent —
—
—
—
—
Bulk purchased 165
374
58
64
398
Total 169
451
114
65
412
Consumer:
Home equity 26
25
64
72
33
Other 11
1
2
1
1
Total 37
26
66
73
34
Total recoveries 206
477
180
138
446
Net charge-offs (142 ) (153 ) (555 ) (1,004 ) (1,211 )
Provision for credit losses —
(750 ) 771
1,409
(1,067 )
Balance at end of period $ 8,398
$ 8,540
$ 9,443
$ 9,227
$ 8,822

Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to
average loans outstanding during the period — % — % 0.01 % 0.02 % 0.02 %

Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to
average non-performing assets 0.56
0.48
1.87
3.38
3.45

ACL to non-performing loans at end of period 50.58
29.32
36.41
37.04
33.36

ACL to loans receivable, net at end of period 0.12
0.12
0.14
0.15
0.15

ACL to net charge-offs 58.9x
55.8x
17.0x
9.2x
7.3x

The distribution of our ACL at the dates indicated is summarized below. ~~Included in bulk purchased loans are $214.5 million of loans, or 61% of the total bulk purchased loan portfolio, at September 30, 2017, for which the seller~~


	September 30,
	2020				2019				2018				2017				2016
			% of				% of				% of				% of				% of
	Amount		Loans to		Amount		Loans to		Amount		Loans to		Amount		Loans to		Amount		Loans to
	of ACL		Total Loans		of ACL		Total Loans		of ACL		Total Loans		of ACL		Total Loans		of ACL		Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	6,044	54.5	%	$	1,982	52.2	%	$	2,933	52.8	%	$	3,149	55.1	%	$	3,892	57.6	%
Correspondent purchased	2,691		29.1		1,203		31.7		1,861		33.4		1,922		34.0		2,102		31.7
Bulk purchased	467		2.9		687		3.4		925		3.9		1,000		4.9		1,065		6.0
Construction	41		0.5		18		0.5		20		0.4		24		0.4		36		0.6
Total	9,243		87.0		3,890		87.8		5,739		90.5		6,095		94.4		7,095		95.9
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	16,869		8.6		3,448		7.9		1,801		5.7		1,242		2.6		774		1.6
Commercial and industrial	1,451		1.4		472		0.8		21		0.8		—		—		—		—
Construction	3,480		1.5		1,251		1.7		734		1.1		870		1.2		434		0.6
Total	21,800		11.5		5,171		10.4		2,556		7.6		2,112		3.8		1,208		2.2
Consumer loans:
Home equity	370		1.4		97		1.6		129		1.8		159		1.7		187		1.8
Other consumer	114		0.1		68		0.2		39		0.1		32		0.1		50		0.1
Total consumer loans	484		1.5		165		1.8		168		1.9		191		1.8		237		1.9
	$	31,527	100.0	%	$	9,226	100.0	%	$	8,463	100.0	%	$	8,398	100.0	%	$	8,540	100.0	%

The majority of the loans ~~has guaranteed~~acquired in the CCB acquisition were not deemed purchased credit impaired ("PCI") as of the acquisition date ("non-PCI loans"). The net purchase discounts associated with non-PCI loans were compared to ~~repurchase or replace any delinquent loans. The Bank has not experienced any losses on loans acquired from this seller as all delinquent loans have been repurchased by this seller since~~ the ~~loan package was purchased in fiscal year 2012. For the $137.2 million~~amount of ~~bulk purchased~~hypothetical ACL estimated for these loans at September 30, ~~2017 that do not have the above noted guarantee, the Bank has continued to experience a reduction in loan losses due to an improvement in collateral values. A large portion~~2020, 2019, and 2018. See "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of ~~these loans were originally interest-only loans with interest-only terms up to 10 years. All~~Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses" for additional information regarding management's estimation of the ~~interest-only~~hypothetical ACL for non-PCI loans. As a result of this analysis, management determined the net purchase discounts were not sufficient, so ACL was recorded on those loans are now fully amortizing loans. Our correspondent purchased loans are purchased on a loan-by-loan basis from a select group of correspondent lenders and are underwritten by the Bank's underwriters based on underwriting standards that are generally the same as for our originated loans. The decrease in one- to four-family ACL fromat September 30, ~~2016 was due to improvements in collateral value~~2020. At September 30, 2019 and ~~historical loss factors within our ACL formula analysis model, as well as to~~2018, the ~~continued low level of~~ net ~~loan charge-offs~~purchase discounts were sufficient and ~~delinquent loan ratios. The increase in the commercial real estate~~no ACL was ~~due primarily~~required on those loans.

The ratio of ACL to ~~growth in~~loans receivable, by loan type, at the ~~loan portfolio~~dates indicated is summarized below. As discussed above, the ACL increased during the current fiscal ~~year.~~year resulting in an overall increase in the ACL to loans receivable ratio at September 30, 2020 compared to the other dates presented in the table below. The bulk purchased loan ACL to loans receivable ratio decreased at September 30, 2020 compared to September 30, 2019 due to the portion of the loan portfolio guaranteed by a third party representing more of the overall portfolio balance. Included in the commercial and industrial loan category at September 30, 2020 are PPP loans. PPP loans are 100% guaranteed by the SBA so the Bank did not record ACL on those loans at September 30, 2020.


	At September 30,
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016
One- to four-family:
Originated	0.15	%	0.05	%	0.07	%	0.08	%	0.10	%
Correspondent purchased	0.13		0.05		0.07		0.08		0.10
Bulk purchased	0.22		0.27		0.32		0.28		0.26
Construction	0.12		0.05		0.06		0.08		0.09
Total	0.15		0.06		0.08		0.09		0.11
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	2.69		0.59		0.42		0.68		0.70
Commercial and industrial	1.49		0.77		0.03		—		—
Construction	3.30		1.02		0.91		1.00		1.00
Total	2.63		0.67		0.45		0.78		0.78
Consumer	0.42		0.13		0.12		0.15		0.19
Total	0.44		0.12		0.11		0.12		0.12

September 30,
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
% of % of % of % of % of
Amount Loans to Amount Loans to Amount Loans to Amount Loans to Amount Loans to
of ACL Total Loans of ACL Total Loans of ACL Total Loans of ACL Total Loans of ACL Total Loans
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family:
Originated $ 3,149
55.1 % $ 3,892
57.6 % $ 4,833
60.6 % $ 6,228
86.0 % $ 5,748
84.8 %
Correspondent purchased⁽¹⁾
1,922
34.0
2,102
31.7
2,115
27.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bulk purchased 1,000
4.9
1,065
6.0
1,434
7.3
2,323
8.9
2,486
10.7
Construction 24
0.4
36
0.6
32
0.4
35
1.1
23
1.1
Total 6,095
94.4
7,095
95.9
8,414
96.2
8,586
96.0
8,257
96.6
Commercial:
Permanent 1,242
2.6
774
1.6
604
1.6
312
1.2
172
0.8
Construction 870
1.2
434
0.6
138
0.2
88
0.6
13
0.2
Total 2,112
3.8
1,208
2.2
742
1.8
400
1.8
185
1.0
Total real estate loans 8,207
98.2
8,303
98.1
9,156
98.0
8,986
97.8
8,442
97.6
Consumer loans:
Home equity 159
1.7
187
1.8
222
1.9
211
2.1
342
2.3
Other consumer 32
0.1
50
0.1
65
0.1
30
0.1
38
0.1
Total consumer loans 191
1.8
237
1.9
287
2.0
241
2.2
380
2.4
$ 8,398
100.0 % $ 8,540
100.0 % $ 9,443
100.0 % $ 9,227
100.0 % $ 8,822
100.0 %


~~(1)~~	The disaggregation of data related to correspondent purchased loans is not available for years prior to fiscal year 2015. For these years, correspondent purchased amounts were combined with originated loans in the ACL formula analysis model.

Investment Activities

Federally chartered savings institutions have the authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations; securities of various federal agencies; government-sponsored enterprises ("GSEs"), including callable agency securities; municipal bonds; certain certificates of deposit of insured banks and savings institutions; certain bankers' acceptances; repurchase agreements; and federal funds. Subject to various restrictions, federally chartered savings institutions may also invest their assets in investment grade commercial paper, corporate debt securities, and mutual funds whose assets conform to the investments that a federally chartered savings institution is otherwise authorized to make directly. As a member of FHLB, the Bank is required to maintain a specified investment in FHLB stock. See "Regulation and Supervision – Federal Home Loan Bank System" and "Office of the Comptroller of the Currency" for a discussion of additional restrictions on our investment activities.

ALCO considers various factors when making investment decisions, including the liquidity, credit, interest rate risk, and tax consequences of the proposed investment options. The composition of the investment portfolio will be affected by various market conditions, including the slope of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, the impact on the Bank's interest rate risk, the trend of net deposit flows, ~~the volume of loan sales,~~ repayments of borrowings, ~~and~~ loan originations and ~~purchases.~~purchases, and commercial construction loan funding.

The general objectives of the Bank's investment portfolio are to provide liquidity when loan demand is high, to assist in maintaining earnings when loan demand is low, and to maximize earnings while satisfactorily managing liquidity risk, interest rate risk, reinvestment risk, and credit risk. Liquidity may increase or decrease depending upon the availability of funds and comparative yields on investments in relation to the return on loans. Cash flow projections are reviewed regularly and updated to ensure that adequate liquidity is maintained.

We have the ability to classify securities as either trading, available-for-sale ("AFS"), or held-to-maturity ("HTM") at the date of purchase. Securities that are purchased and held principally for resale in the near future are classified as trading securities and are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in the consolidated statements of income. AFS securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI") within stockholders' equity, net of deferred income taxes. HTM securities are reported at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount. ~~We have both~~Effective September 30, 2019, the ~~ability~~

Company adopted ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and ~~intent~~Hedging: Targeted Improvements to ~~hold our~~Accounting for Hedging Activities and certain components of ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments that are applicable to ASU 2017-12. As part of the adoption, the Company reclassified its entire portfolio of HTM securities, totaling $444.7 million at amortized cost, to ~~maturity.~~AFS securities.

On a quarterly basis, management ~~conducts a formal review of~~reviews securities for the presence of an other-than-temporary impairment. The process involves monitoring market events and other items that could impact issuers. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information. Management does not believe any other-than-temporary impairments existed at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

Investment Securities. Our investment securities portfolio consists primarily of debentures issued by GSEs (primarily Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA"), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC") and the Federal Home Loan Banks) and non-taxable municipal bonds. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, our investment securities portfolio totaled ~~$301.1~~$380.1 million. The portfolio consisted entirely of securities classified as ~~either HTM or~~ AFS. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 3.4. Securities" and "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Investment Securities" for additional information.

Mortgage-Backed Securities. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, our MBS portfolio totaled ~~$942.4 million.~~$1.18 billion. The portfolio consisted entirely of securities classified as ~~either HTM or~~ AFS and were primarily issued by GSEs. The principal and interest payments of MBS issued by GSEs are collateralized by the underlying mortgage assets with principal and interest payments guaranteed by the GSEs. The underlying mortgage assets are conforming mortgages that comply with FNMA and FHLMC underwriting guidelines, as applicable, and are therefore not considered subprime. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 3.4. Securities" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Mortgage-Backed Securities" for additional information.

MBS generally yield less than the loans that underlie such securities because of the servicing fee retained by the servicer and the cost of payment guarantees or credit enhancements retained by the GSEs that reduce credit risk. However, MBS are generally more liquid than individual mortgage loans and may be used to collateralize certain borrowings and public unit deposits of the Bank. In general, MBS issued or guaranteed by FNMA and FHLMC are weighted at no more than 20% for risk-based capital purposes compared to the 50% risk-weighting assigned to most non-securitized one- to four-family loans.

When securities are purchased for a price other than par value, the difference between the price paid and par is accreted to or amortized against the interest earned over the life of the security, depending on whether a discount or premium to par was paid. Movements in interest rates affect prepayment rates which, in turn, affect the average lives of MBS and the speed at which the discount or premium is accreted to or amortized against earnings.

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the MBS portfolio included ~~$133.8~~$70.5 million of collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs"). CMOs are special types of MBS in which the stream of principal and interest payments on the underlying mortgages or MBS are used to create investment classes with different maturities and, in some cases, different amortization schedules, as well as a residual interest, with each such class possessing different risk characteristics. We do not purchase residual interest bonds.

While MBS issued by FNMA and FHLMC carry a reduced credit risk compared to whole mortgage loans, these securities remain subject to the risk that a fluctuating interest rate environment, along with other factors such as the geographic distribution of the underlying mortgage loans, may alter the prepayment rate of the underlying mortgage loans and consequently affect both the prepayment speed and value of the securities. As noted above, the Bank, on some transactions, pays a premium over par value on MBS purchased. Large premiums could cause significant negative yield adjustments due to accelerated prepayments on the underlying mortgages. The balance of net premiums on our portfolio of MBS at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 was ~~$9.0~~$11.9 million.

The following table sets forth the composition of our investment and MBS portfolios as of the dates indicated.At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, our investment securities portfolio did not contain securities of any issuer with an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our stockholders' equity, excluding those issued by GSEs.


	September 30,
	2020						2019						2018
	Carrying		% of		Fair		Carrying		% of		Fair		Carrying		% of		Fair
	Value		Total		Value		Value		Total		Value		Value		Total		Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
MBS	$	1,180,803	75.7	%	$	1,180,803	$	936,487	77.7	%	$	936,487	$	445,090	62.3	%	$	445,090
GSE debentures	370,340		23.7		370,340		249,954		20.8		249,954		265,398		37.1		265,398

Municipal bonds	9,807		0.6		9,807		18,422		1.5		18,422		4,126		0.6		4,126
	1,560,950		100.0	%	1,560,950		1,204,863		100.0	%	1,204,863		714,614		100.0	%	714,614

HTM:
MBS	—		—	%	—		—		—	%	—		591,900		96.7	%	580,825
Municipal bonds	—		—		—		—		—		—		20,418		3.3		20,246

	—		—	%	—		—		—	%	—		612,318		100.0	%	601,071
	$	1,560,950			$	1,560,950	$	1,204,863			$	1,204,863	$	1,326,932			$	1,315,685

September 30,
2017 2016 2015
Carrying % of Fair Carrying % of Fair Carrying % of Fair
Value Total Value Value Total Value Value Total Value
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures $ 270,729
65.1 % $ 270,729
$ 347,038
65.8 % $ 347,038
$ 526,620
69.4 % $ 526,620
MBS 141,516
34.0
141,516
178,507
33.9
178,507
229,491
30.3
229,491
TRUPs 2,051
0.5
2,051
1,756
0.3
1,756
1,916
0.3
1,916
Municipal bonds 1,535
0.4
1,535
—
—
—
144
—
144
415,831
100.0 % 415,831
527,301
100.0 % 527,301
758,171
100.0 % 758,171

HTM:
MBS 800,931
96.8 % 806,096
1,067,571
97.0 % 1,089,214
1,233,048
97.0 % 1,256,783
Municipal bonds 26,807
3.2
26,913
33,303
3.0
33,653
38,074
3.0
38,491
827,738
100.0 % 833,009
1,100,874
100.0 % 1,122,867
1,271,122
100.0 % 1,295,274
$ 1,243,569
$ 1,248,840
$ 1,628,175
$ 1,650,168
$ 2,029,293
$ 2,053,445

The composition and maturities of the investment and MBS portfolio at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 are indicated in the following table by remaining contractual maturity, without consideration of call features or pre-refunding dates, along with associated weighted average yields. Yields on tax-exempt investments are not calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.


	1 year or less				More than 1 to 5 years				More than 5 to 10 years				Over 10 years				Total Securities
	Carrying				Carrying				Carrying				Carrying				Carrying
	Value		Yield		Value		Yield		Value		Yield		Value		Yield		Value		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)



MBS	$	3,664	2.63	%	$	58,924	1.90	%	$	272,681	2.34	%	$	845,534	1.82	%	$	1,180,803	1.94	%
GSE debentures	—		—		370,340		0.62		—		—		—		—		370,340		0.62

Municipal bonds	4,009		1.47		5,798		1.85		—		—		—		—		9,807		1.69







	$	7,673	2.02		$	435,062	0.81		$	272,681	2.34		$	845,534	1.82		$	1,560,950	1.62

1 year or less More than 1 to 5 years More than 5 to 10 years Over 10 years Total Securities
Carrying Carrying Carrying Carrying Carrying Fair
Value Yield Value Yield Value Yield Value Yield Value Yield Value
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures $ 121,253
1.13 % $ 149,476
1.41 % $ —
— % $ —
— % $ 270,729
1.29 % $ 270,729
MBS 175
3.75
17,413
4.79
21,079
3.15
102,849
3.22
141,516
3.40
141,516
TRUPs —
—
—
—
—
—
2,051
2.58
2,051
2.58
2,051
Municipal bonds —
—
1,535
1.30
—
—
—
—
1,535
1.30
1,535
121,428
1.13
168,424
1.76
21,079
3.15
104,900
3.20
415,831
1.99
415,831

HTM:
MBS 2,709
3.93
41,355
2.42
426,341
2.01
330,526
2.12
800,931
2.09
806,096
Municipal bonds 6,141
2.22
20,448
1.50
218
2.00
—
—
26,807
1.67
26,913
8,850
2.74
61,803
2.12
426,559
2.01
330,526
2.12
827,738
2.07
833,009
$ 130,278
1.24
$ 230,227
1.86
$ 447,638
2.07
$ 435,426
2.38
$ 1,243,569
2.05
$ 1,248,840

Sources of Funds

General. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, FHLB borrowings, repurchase agreements, repayments and maturities of outstanding loans and MBS and other short-term investments, and funds provided by operations.

Deposits. We offer a variety of retail deposit accounts ~~having~~and commercial deposit accounts and services. Our deposit account offerings have a wide range of interest rates and terms. Our deposits consist of savings accounts, money market deposit accounts, interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing checking accounts, and certificates of deposit. We rely primarily upon competitive pricing policies, marketing, and customer service to attract and retain deposits. The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and prevailing interest rates, and competition. The variety of deposit accounts we offer has allowed us to utilize strategic pricing to obtain funds and to respond with flexibility to changes in consumer demand. We seek to manage the pricing of our deposits in keeping with our asset and liability management, liquidity, and profitability objectives. Based on our experience, we believe that our deposits are stable sources of funds. Despite this stability, our ability to attract and maintain these deposits and the rates paid on them has been, and will continue to be, significantly affected by market conditions.

The Board of Directors has authorized the utilization of brokers to obtain deposits as a source of funds. Depending on market conditions, the Bank may use brokered deposits to fund asset growth and gather deposits that may help to manage interest rate risk. No brokered deposits were acquired during fiscal year ~~2017~~2020 and there were no brokered deposits outstanding at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 or ~~2016.~~2019.

The Board of Directors also has authorized the utilization of public unit ~~deposits~~certificates of deposit as a source of funds. In order to qualify to obtain such deposits, the Bank must have a branch in each county in which it collects public unit ~~deposits~~certificates of deposit and, by law, must pledge securities as collateral for all such balances in excess of the FDIC insurance limits. At September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, the balance of public unit ~~deposits~~certificates of deposit was ~~$460.0~~$254.8 million and ~~$370.0~~$294.9 million, respectively.

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank's policy allows for combined brokered and public unit ~~deposits~~certificates of deposit up to 15% of total deposits. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, that amount was approximately 9%4% of total deposits.

Borrowings. We utilize borrowings when we ~~desire~~need additional capacity to fund loan demand or when they help us meet our asset and liability management objectives. Historically, our term borrowings have consisted primarily of FHLB advances. FHLB advances may be made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate, maturity, repayment, and embedded options, if any. At September 30, ~~2017, $1.98~~2020, $1.15 billion of our FHLB advances were fixed-rate advances with no embedded options and ~~$200.0~~$640.0 million of our FHLB advances were variable-rate, also with no embedded options. The variable-rate advances are tied to interest rate swaps, effectively converting the adjustable-rate borrowings into fixed-rate liabilities. At times, the Bank supplements FHLB borrowings with repurchase agreements, wherein the Bank enters into agreements with ~~Board approved~~Board-approved counterparties to sell securities under agreements to repurchase them. These agreements are recorded as financing transactions as the Bank maintains effective control over the transferred securities. Repurchase agreements are made at mutually agreed upon terms between counterparties and the Bank. The use of repurchase agreements allows for the diversification of funding sources and the use of securities that were not being leveraged as collateral. The Bank also regularly uses its FHLB line of credit as a source of funding. The Bank's internal policy limits total borrowings to 55% of total assets.

~~During fiscal year 2017, the Bank continued to utilize~~At September 30, 2020, we had $1.79 billion of FHLB advances, at par, outstanding and did not have a ~~leverage strategy (the "leverage strategy") to increase earnings. The leverage strategy during the current fiscal year involved borrowing up to $2.10 billion either~~balance outstanding on the Bank's FHLB line of credit, ~~or by entering into short-term FHLB advances, depending on the rates offered by FHLB. The borrowings were repaid prior to each quarter end~~ for ~~regulatory purposes. The proceeds~~a total of ~~the borrowings, net~~19% of ~~the required FHLB stock holdings, were deposited at the Federal Reserve~~ Bank Call Report total assets as of ~~Kansas City ("FRB of Kansas City"). Management can discontinue the use of the leverage strategy at any point in time.~~

At September 30, ~~2017, we had $2.18 billion of FHLB advances, at par, outstanding.~~2020. Total FHLB borrowings are secured by certain qualifying loans pursuant to a blanket collateral agreement with FHLB. Per FHLB's lending guidelines, total FHLB borrowings cannot exceed 40% of Bank Call Report total assets without the pre-approval of FHLB senior management. ~~In July 2017, the president of the FHLB renewed the approval of the increase in the~~The Bank's borrowing limit ranged from 50% to 55% of Bank Call Report total assets ~~through July 2018. This approval was also in place throughout~~during fiscal year ~~2017~~2020, as ~~FHLB borrowings were in excess~~approved by the president of ~~40% of Call Report total assets at certain points in time during~~FHLB. At September 30, 2020, the ~~period due to the leverage strategy.~~approved limit was 50%.

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank did not have any repurchase agreements ~~totaled $200.0 million, or approximately 2% of total assets.~~outstanding. The Bank may enter into ~~additional~~ repurchase agreements as management deems appropriate, not to exceed 15% of total assets and subject to the internal policy limit on total borrowings of 55%. The securities underlying the agreements continue to be reported in the Bank's securities portfolio. ~~At September 30, 2017, we had securities with a fair value of $218.5 million pledged as collateral on repurchase agreements.~~

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the category of borrowings for which the average short-term balance outstanding during the period was at least 30% of stockholders' equity at the end of each period shown. The maximum balance, average balance, and weighted average contractual interest rate during the fiscal years shown reflect borrowings that were scheduled to mature within one year at any month-end during those years.


	2020			2019			2018
	(Dollars in thousands)
Short-term FHLB borrowings:
Balance at end of period	$	843,000		$	1,090,000		$	975,000
Maximum balance outstanding at any month-end during the period	1,240,000			1,090,000			2,975,000
Average balance	1,024,866			1,208,456			2,189,483
Weighted average contractual interest rate during the period	1.62		%	2.34		%	1.65		%
Weighted average contractual interest rate at end of period	0.76			2.15			2.00

2017
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
FHLB Borrowings:
Balance at end of period $ 475,000
$ 500,000
$ 1,100,000
Maximum balance outstanding at any month-end during the period 2,675,000
2,600,000
2,700,000
Average balance 2,520,217
2,436,749
2,558,676
Weighted average contractual interest rate during the period 1.27 % 0.70 % 0.60 %
Weighted average contractual interest rate at end of period 1.91
2.69
0.69

Subsidiary Activities

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Company had one wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank. The Bank provides a full range of retail banking services through 4754 banking offices serving primarily the metropolitan areas of Topeka, Wichita, Lawrence, Manhattan, Emporia and Salina, Kansas and portions of the metropolitan area of greater Kansas City. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank had ~~one~~two wholly-owned ~~subsidiary,~~subsidiaries, Capitol Funds, Inc. and Capital City Investments, Inc. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, Capitol Funds, Inc. had one wholly-owned subsidiary, Capitol Federal Mortgage Reinsurance Company ("CFMRC"), which ~~serves~~historically served as a reinsurance company for certain PMI companies the Bank uses in its normal course of operations. CFMRC stopped writing new business for the Bank in January 2010. Capital City Investments, Inc. is a real estate and investment holding company. Each wholly-owned subsidiary is reported with the Company on a consolidated basis.

Regulation and Supervision

Set forth below is a description of certain laws and regulations that are applicable to Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and the Bank. This description is intended as a brief summary of selected features of such laws and regulations and is qualified in its entirety by references to the laws and regulations applicable to the Company and the Bank.

General. The Bank, as a federally chartered savings bank, is subject to regulation and oversight by the OCC extending to all aspects of its operations. This regulation of the Bank is intended for the protection of depositors and other customers and not for the purpose of protecting the Company's stockholders. The Bank is required to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital and is subject to some limitations on capital distributions to the Company. See "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions" for additional information regarding capital distributions and regulatory requirements. The Bank also is subject to regulation and examination by the FDIC, which insures the deposits of the Bank to the maximum extent permitted by law.

The Company is a unitary savings and loan holding company within the meaning of the Home Owners' Loan Act ("HOLA"). As such, the Company is registered with the FRB and subject to the FRB regulations, examinations, supervision, and reporting requirements. In addition, the FRB has enforcement authority over the Company. Among other things, this authority permits the FRB to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the Bank.

The OCC and FRB enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil monetary penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders, and to initiate injunctive actions. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed. Except under certain circumstances, public disclosure of final enforcement actions by the OCC or the FRB is required by law.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The investment and lending authority of the Bank is prescribed by federal laws and regulations and the Bank is prohibited from engaging in any activities not permitted by such laws and regulations.

As a federally chartered savings bank, the Bank is required to meet a Qualified Thrift Lender ("QTL") ~~test.~~test in order to avoid certain restrictions on its operations. This test requires the Bank to have at least 65% of its portfolio assets, as defined by statute, in qualified thrift investments at month-end for 9 out of every 12 months on a rolling basis. Under an alternative test, the Bank's business must consist primarily of acquiring the savings of the public and investing in loans, while maintaining 60% of its assets in those assets specified in Section 7701(a)(19) of the Internal Revenue ~~Code.~~Code of 1986. Under either test, the Bank is required to maintain a significant portion of its assets in residential housing related loans and investments. An institution that fails to qualify as a QTL based upon one of these tests is immediately subject to certain restrictions on its operations, including a prohibition against capital distributions, except with the prior approval of both the OCC and the FRB, as necessary to meet the obligations of a company controlling the institution. If the Bank fails the QTL test and does not regain QTL status within one year, or fails the test for a second time, the Company must immediately register as, and become subject to, the restrictions applicable to a bank holding company. The activities authorized for a bank holding company are more limited than are the activities authorized for a savings and loan holding company. Three years after failing the test, an institution must divest all investments and cease all activities not permissible for both a national bank and a savings association. Failure to meet the QTL test is a statutory violation subject to enforcement action. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank met the QTL test.

The Bank is subject to a 35% of total assets limit on non-real estate consumer loans, commercial paper and corporate debt securities, and a 20% limit on commercial non-mortgage loans. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank ~~had less than 1% of its assets~~was in ~~non-real estate consumer loans, commercial paper, corporate debt securities and commercial non-mortgage loans.~~compliance with these limits.

The Bank's relationship with its depositors and borrowers is regulated to a great extent by federal laws and regulations, especially in such matters as the ownership of savings accounts and the form and content of mortgage requirements. In addition, the branching authority of the Bank is regulated by the OCC. The Bank is generally authorized to branch nationwide.

The Bank is subject to a statutory lending limit on aggregate loans to one person or a group of persons combined because of certain common interests. ~~That~~The general limit is equal to 15% of our unimpaired capital and surplus, plus an additional 10% for loans fully secured by readily marketable collateral. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank's lending limit under this restriction was ~~$181.5~~$180.1 million. The Bank has no loans or loan relationships in excess of its lending limit. Total loan commitments and loans outstanding to the Bank's largest borrowing relationship totaled ~~$50.0~~$68.0 million at September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, all of which was current according to its terms.

The Bank is subject to periodic examinations by the OCC. During these examinations, the examiners may require the Bank to increase its ACL, change the classification of loans, and/or recognize additional charge-offs based on their judgments, which can impact our capital and earnings. As a federally chartered savings bank, the Bank is subject to a semi-annual assessment, based upon its total assets, to fund the operations of the OCC.

The OCC has adopted guidelines establishing safety and soundness standards on such matters as loan underwriting and documentation, asset quality, earnings standards, internal controls and audit systems, interest rate risk exposure, and compensation and other employee benefits. Any institution regulated by the OCC that fails to comply with these standards must submit a compliance plan.

Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC. The DIF of the FDIC insures deposit accounts in the Bank up to applicable limits. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions, and credit unions to $250 thousand per ~~depositor.~~separately insured deposit ownership right or category.

~~Effective July 1, 2016, the~~The FDIC assesses deposit insurance premiums on all FDIC-insured institutions quarterly based on annualized rates. Under these rules, assessment rates for ~~established small institutions, such as the Bank,~~an institution with total assets of less than $10 billion are ~~based on an institution's~~determined by weighted average CAMELS ~~component~~composite ratings and certain financial ~~ratios. Total base assessment rates~~ratios, and range from 1.5 to 1630.0 basis points, based on Call Report total assets for institutions with CAMELS composite ratings of 1 or 2, 3 to 30 basis points for those with a CAMELS composite score of 3, and 11 to 30 basis points for those with CAMELS composite scores of 4 or 5, subject to certain adjustments. For the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank paid ~~$3.0 million~~$914 thousand in FDIC premiums.

~~An institution that has reported on~~ Assessment rates are applied to an institution's assessment base, which is its ~~Call Reports~~average consolidated total assets atminus its average tangible equity during the ~~end~~assessment period.

The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments, and any significant increases would have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of the quarter of $10 billion or more for at least four consecutive quarters is considered a large institution and is assessed under a complex scorecard method employing many factors, including weighted average CAMELS ratings; a performance score; leverage ratio; ability to withstand asset-related stress; certain measures of concentration, core earnings, core deposits, credit quality, and liquidity; and a loss severity score and loss severity measure. Total base assessment rates for these institutions currently range from 1.5 to 40 basis points, subject to certain adjustments. For all institutions, the baseCompany. Management cannot predict what assessment rates will ~~decrease when~~be in the ~~reserve ratio increases~~future. In a banking industry emergency, the FDIC may also impose a special assessment.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to ~~specified thresholds~~continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. We do not currently know of ~~2% and 2.5%.~~any practice, condition, or violation that may lead to termination of our deposit insurance.

The Dodd-Frank Act ~~requires~~required large institutions to bear the burden of raising the reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%. To implement this mandate, large and highly complex institutions ~~must pay~~paid an annual surcharge of 4.5 basis points on their assessment base ~~beginning July 1, 2016. If~~through December 28, 2018 as a result of the DIF ~~reserve~~ ratio has not reached 1.35% by December 31, 2018, the FDIC plans to impose a shortfall assessment on large institutions on March 31, 2019. The FDIC may increase or decrease its rates by 2 basis points without further rule-making. In an emergency, the FDIC may also impose a special assessment.reaching 1.36%.

Since established small institutions ~~will be contributing~~contributed to the DIF while the reserve ratio ~~remains~~was between 1.15% and 1.35% ~~and the large institutions are paying a surcharge,~~, the FDIC ~~will provide~~has provided assessment credits to the established small institutions for the portion of their assessments that ~~contribute~~contributed to the increase. ~~When~~The Bank received $2.8 million in credits to apply to FDIC assessments. Pursuant to regulatory guidance, once the reserve ratio ~~reaches~~exceeds 1.38%, credits are allocated to banks with less than $10 billion in assets. These credits were utilized to offset the ~~FDIC will automatically apply an established small institution's assessment~~Bank's premium assessments until they were exhausted. The Bank utilized $1.6 million and $1.2 million of the credit ~~to reduce its regular deposit insurance assessments.~~during fiscal year 2020 and 2019, respectively.

FDIC-insured institutions ~~are~~were required to pay additional quarterly assessments ~~called the FICO assessments~~known as "FICO assessments" in order to fund the interest on bonds issued to resolve thrift failures in the 1980s. The rate for these assessments iswas adjusted quarterly and iswas applied to the same base as used for the deposit insurance assessment. These assessments ~~are expected to continue until~~were discontinued during fiscal year 2019 when the bonds ~~mature in~~matured. As such, the ~~years 2017 through 2019. For the~~Bank did not pay any FICO assessments during fiscal year ~~ended September 30, 2017, the Bank paid $546 thousand in FICO assessments.~~2020.

Transactions with Affiliates. Transactions between the Bank and its affiliates are required to be on terms as favorable to the institution as transactions with non-affiliates, and certain of these transactions are restricted to a percentage of the Bank's capital, and, in the case of loans, require eligible collateral in specified amounts. In addition, the Bank may not lend to any affiliate engaged in activities not permissible for a bank holding company or purchase or invest in the securities of affiliates.

Regulatory Capital Requirements. The Bank and Company are required to maintain specified levels of regulatory capital under regulations of the OCC and FRB, respectively.

In September 2019, the regulatory agencies, including the OCC and FRB, adopted a final rule, effective January 1, 2020, creating a community bank leverage ratio ("CBLR") for institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion and that meet other qualifying criteria related to off-balance sheet exposures and trading assets and liabilities. The ~~current regulatory~~CBLR provides for a simple measure of capital ~~rules, sometimes referred~~adequacy for qualifying institutions. Management has elected to asuse the ~~Basel III rules, became effective~~CBLR framework for the ~~Company~~Bank and ~~Bank in January 2016, with some rules being transitioned into full effectiveness over two-to-four years.~~Company.

~~Under the Basel III rules, the minimum capital ratios are~~

The CBLR is calculated as ~~follows:~~

~~4.5% Common Equity~~ Tier 1 ~~("CET1") to risk-weighted assets.~~

~~6.0% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets.~~

~~8.0% Total capital to risk-weighted assets.~~

~~4.0% Tier 1 capital~~Capital to average consolidated assets as reported on ~~consolidated financial statements (known as the "leverage ratio").~~

~~CET1 capital and~~an institution's regulatory reports. Tier 1 ~~capital~~Capital, for the Company and the Bank, consists of common stock plus related surplus and retained earnings. Tier 2 capital for the Company and the Bank includes the balance of ACL; however, the amount of includable ACL in Tier 2 capital may be limited if the amount exceeds 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. At September 30, 2017, the Bank had $8.4 million of ACL, which was less than the 1.25% risk-weighted assets limit; therefore, the entire amount of ACL was includable in Tier 2 and total risk-based capital. Total capital for the Company and the Bankgenerally consists of common stock plus related surplus and retained earnings, ~~(Tier 1 capital) plus~~adjusted for goodwill and other intangible assets and AOCI-related amounts. Qualifying institutions that elect to use the ~~amount~~CBLR framework and that maintain a leverage ratio of ~~includable ACL (Tier 2 capital).~~

~~Basel III requires~~greater than 9% will be considered to have satisfied the ~~Company~~generally applicable risk-based and leverage capital requirements in the ~~Bank~~regulatory agencies' capital rules, and to have met the well-capitalized ratio requirements. In April 2020, as directed by Section 4012 of the CARES Act, the regulatory agencies introduced temporary changes to the CBLR. These changes, which subsequently were adopted as a final rule, temporarily reduce the CBLR requirement to 8% through the end of 2020. Beginning in 2021, the CBLR requirement will increase to 8.5% for the calendar year before returning to 9% in 2022. A qualifying institution utilizing the CBLR framework that fails to maintain a capital conservation buffer above certain minimum capital ratios for capital adequacy purposes in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and other payments including dividends, share repurchases, and certain compensation. This requirement became effective January 1, 2016, and is being phased in over a four year period by increasingleverage ratio greater than the required ~~buffer amount by 0.625% each year. The capital conservation buffer was 0.625% at September 30, 2016 and 1.25% at September 30, 2017. At September 30, 2017 and 2016,~~percentage is allowed a two-quarter grace period in which to increase its leverage ratio back above the ~~Bank and Company had capital greater~~required percentage. During the grace period, a qualifying institution will still be considered well capitalized so long as it maintains a leverage ratio of no more than ~~necessary~~one percent less than the required percentage. If an institution either fails to meet all the ~~capital conservation buffer requirement. Once fully phased-in, which will be January 1, 2019 for~~qualifying criteria within the ~~Bank and Company, the organization must~~grace period, or fails to maintain a ~~balance~~leverage ratio of ~~capital that exceeds by~~no more than ~~2.5% each of~~one percent less than the ~~minimum risk-based~~required percentage, it becomes ineligible to use the CBLR framework and must instead comply with generally applicable capital ~~ratios in order~~rules, sometimes referred to satisfy the requirement. This translates into the following for the risk-based capital ratios when the capital conservation buffer is fully phased in: (1) CET1 capital ratio of more than 7.0%, (2) Tier 1 capital ratio of more than 8.5%, and (3) Total capital (Tier 1 plus Tier 2) ratio of more than 10.5%.

~~With respect to the Bank, the~~as Basel III rules revised the "prompt corrective action" regulations, by (1) introducing a CET1 ratio requirement at each level (other than critically under-capitalized), with the required CET1 ratio being 6.5% for well-capitalized status; (2) increasing the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirement for each category, with the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio for well-capitalized status being 8% (compared to the previous 6%); and (3) eliminating the provision that a bank with a composite supervisory rating of 1 may have a 3% leverage ratio and still be adequately capitalized.rules.

Under the Basel III rules, an institution that is not an advanced approaches institution, such as the Company and the Bank, was allowed to make a one-time permanent election to continue to exclude certain AOCI items for the purpose of determining regulatory capital ratios. Management made this election in order to remove any volatility related to AOCI from the Company's and Bank's capital ratios.~~At September 30, 2017, the Bank had $2.9 million of AOCI.~~

Regulatory risk-weighted capital guidelines assign a certain risk weighting to every asset. Certain off-balance sheet items, such as binding loan commitments, are multiplied by credit conversion factors to translate the amounts into balance sheet equivalents before assigning them specific risk weightings. The risk weights for the Bank's and Company's assets and off-balance sheet items generally range from 0% to 150%. At September 30, 2017, the Bank and the Company each had risk-weighted assets of $4.43 billion.

For the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank reported in its Call Report quarterly average assets of ~~$11.12~~$9.45 billion and a CBLR of 12.4%, and the Company reported to the FRB quarterly average assets of $11.12 billion. These average asset amounts are significantly higher than total assets at September 30, 2017 due the leverage strategy being in place during the quarter but not at September 30, 2017.

$9.45 billion and a CBLR of 13.7%. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank was considered well capitalized under OCC regulations. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note ~~12.~~14. Regulatory Capital Requirements" and "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources" for additional regulatory capital information.

The OCC has the ability to establish an individual minimum capital ~~requirement~~requirements for a particular institution which ~~varies~~vary from the capital levels that would otherwise be required under the applicable capital regulations based on such factors as concentrations of credit risk, levels of interest rate risk, ~~and~~ the risks of non-traditional activities, ~~as well as others.~~and other circumstances. The OCC has not imposed any such requirement on the Bank.

The OCC is authorized and, under certain circumstances, required to take certain actions against federal savings banks that are considered not to be adequately capitalized because they fail to meet the minimum ~~ratios for an adequately capitalized institution.~~requirements associated with their elected capital framework. Any such institution must submit a capital restoration plan for OCC approval and ~~until such plan is approved by the OCC,~~ may not increase its assets, acquire another institution, establish a branch or engage in any new activities, and ~~generally~~ may not make capital distributions. The OCC may impose further restrictions. The plan must include a guaranty by the institution's holding company limited to the lesser of 5% of the institution's assets when it became undercapitalized, or the amount necessary to restore the institution to adequately capitalized status.

Federal regulations state that any institution that fails to comply with its capital plan or has a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0% is considered significantly undercapitalized and must be made subject to one or more additional specified actions and operating restrictions that may cover all aspects of its operations and may include a forced merger or acquisition of the institution. An institution with tangible equity to total assets of less than 2.0% is critically undercapitalized and becomes subject to further mandatory restrictions on its operations. The OCC generally is authorized to reclassify an institution into a lower capital category and impose the restrictions applicable to such category if the institution is engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or is in an unsafe or unsound condition. The imposition by the OCC of any of these measures on the Bank may have a substantial adverse effect on its operations and profitability. In general, the FDIC must be appointed receiver for a critically undercapitalized institution whose capital is not restored within the time provided. When the FDIC as receiver liquidates an institution, the claims of depositors and the FDIC as their successor (for deposits covered by FDIC insurance) have priority over other unsecured claims against the institution.

Community Reinvestment and Consumer Protection Laws. In connection with its lending activities, the Bank is subject to a number of federal laws designed to protect borrowers and promote lending to various sectors of the economy and population. These include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 ("SAFE Act"), and the Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA"). In addition, federal banking regulators, pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, have enacted regulations limiting the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose nonpublic consumer

information to non-affiliated third parties. The regulations require disclosure of privacy policies and allow consumers to prevent certain personal information from being shared with non-affiliated third parties. With respect to federal consumer protection laws, regulations are generally promulgated by the CFPB, but the OCC examines the Bank for compliance with such laws.

The CRA requires the appropriate federal banking agency, in connection with its examination of an FDIC-insured institution, to assess its record in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by the ~~bank,~~institution, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The federal banking regulators take into account the institution's record of performance under the CRA when considering applications for mergers, acquisitions, and branches. Under the CRA, institutions are assigned a rating of outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve, or substantial non-compliance. The Bank received a satisfactory rating in its most recently completed CRA ~~evaluation five years ago.~~evaluation.

In May 2020, the OCC released a final rule amending its regulations under the CRA. The final rule clarifies and expands the activities that qualify for CRA credit, updates where activities count for such credits and seeks to provide more consistent and objective measures for evaluating performance. The final rule became effective on October 1, 2020 but compliance with the amended requirements is not mandatory for the Bank until January 1, 2023.

Bank Secrecy Act /Anti-Money Laundering Laws. The Bank is subject to the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering laws, ~~and regulations,~~ including the USA PATRIOT Act of ~~2001.~~2001 and regulations thereunder. These laws and regulations require the Bank to implement policies, procedures, and controls to detect, prevent, and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identity and source of deposits and wealth of its customers. Violations of these ~~requirements~~laws and regulations can result in substantial civil and criminal sanctions. In addition, provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act require the federal financial institution regulatory agencies to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution's anti-money laundering activities when reviewing mergers and acquisitions.

~~Stress Testing.~~ As required by the Dodd-Frank Act and the regulations of the FRB and the OCC, FDIC-insured institutions and their holding companies with average total consolidated assets greater than $10 billion must conduct annual, company-run stress tests under the baseline, adverse and severely adverse scenarios provided by the federal banking regulators. The Company and the Bank are not subject to this requirement as their average total consolidated assets for this purpose are not greater than $10 billion.

Federal Securities Law. The common stock of the Company is registered with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements of the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Company stock held by persons who are affiliates of the Company may not be resold without registration or unless sold in accordance with certain resale restrictions. For this purpose, affiliates are generally considered to be executive officers, directors and principal stockholders. If the Company meets specified current public information requirements, each affiliate of the Company ~~will be able to~~generally may sell in the public market, without registration, a limited number of shares in any three-month period.

Federal Reserve System. The FRB requires all depository institutions to maintain reserves at specified levels against their transaction accounts, primarily checking accounts. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FRB reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective on March 26, 2020, to support lending to households and businesses. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank was in compliance with ~~these~~the reserve ~~requirements.~~ requirements in place at that time and is still in compliance with the reserve requirements through the date of this filing.

The Bank is authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank "discount window." An eligible institution need not exhaust other sources of funds before going to the discount window, nor are there restrictions on the purposes for which the ~~borrower~~institution can use primary credit. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank had no outstanding borrowings from the discount window.

Federal Home Loan Bank System. The Bank is a member of ~~FHLB Topeka, which is~~ one of 11 regional Federal Home Loan ~~Banks. Each FHLB~~Banks, each of which serves as a reserve, or central bank, for its members within its assigned region and is funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the ~~FHLB~~Federal Home Loan Bank System. It makes loans, called advances, to members and provides access to a line of credit in accordance with policies and procedures established by the Board of Directors of FHLB, which are subject to the oversight of the Federal Housing Finance ~~Agency ("FHFA").~~Agency.

As a member, the Bank is required to purchase and maintain capital stock in FHLB. The minimum required FHLB stock amount is generally 4.5% of the Bank's FHLB advances and outstanding balance against the FHLB line of credit, and 2% of the outstanding principal of loans sold into the Mortgage Partnership Finance program. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank had a balance of ~~$101.0~~$93.9 million in FHLB stock, which was in compliance with this requirement. In past years, the Bank has received dividends on its FHLB stock, although no assurance can be given that these dividends will continue. On a quarterly basis, management conducts a financial review of FHLB to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment of the FHLB stock is present. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, management concluded there was no such impairment.

Federal Savings and Loan Holding Company Regulation. The purpose and powers of the Company are to pursue any or all of the lawful objectives of a savings and loan holding company and to exercise any of the powers accorded to a savings and loan holding company.

The HOLA prohibits a savings and loan holding company (directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries) from acquiring another savings association, or holding company thereof, without prior written approval from the FRB; acquiring or retaining, with certain exceptions, more than 5% of a non-subsidiary savings association, a non-subsidiary holding company, or a non-subsidiary company engaged in activities other than those permitted by the HOLA; or acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not federally insured. In evaluating applications by savings and loan holding companies to acquire savings associations, the FRB must consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community, competitive factors, and other factors.

~~The Dodd-Frank Act extended to savings and loan holding companies the FRB's "source of strength" doctrine, which has long applied to bank holding companies.~~ The FRB has ~~promulgated~~long set forth in its regulations ~~implementing the~~its "source of strength" policy, which requires holding companies to act as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress. The Dodd-Frank Act extended to savings and loan holding companies and codified the FRB's "source of strength" doctrine, which had applied to bank holding companies before the FRB regulated savings and loan holding companies in addition to bank holding companies.

Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act and Other Regulations. In May 2018, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the "Regulatory Relief Act"), was enacted to modify or remove certain financial reform rules and regulations, including some of those implemented under the Dodd-Frank Act. While the Regulatory Relief Act maintains most of the regulatory structure established by the Dodd-Frank Act, it amends certain aspects of the regulatory framework for small depository institutions with assets of less than $10 billion and for large banks with assets of more than $50 billion. Many of these changes could result in meaningful regulatory changes for community banks such as the Bank, and their holding companies.

The Regulatory Relief Act, among other matters, expands the definition of qualified mortgages which may be held by a financial institution and simplifies the regulatory capital rules for financial institutions and their holding companies with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion by instructing the federal banking regulators to establish a single CBLR, as described above, under "Regulatory Capital Requirements." In addition, the Regulatory Relief Act includes regulatory relief for community banks regarding regulatory examination cycles, call reports, the Volcker Rule (proprietary trading prohibitions), mortgage disclosures and risk weights for certain high-risk commercial real estate loans.

Regulations have been adopted which allow a federal savings association with total consolidated assets of $20 billion or less as of December 31, 2017 to operate as a covered savings association, having generally the same rights, privileges, duties, restrictions, limitations and conditions as a national bank.

Amendments to the Volcker Rule exclude from the definition of "banking entity" certain firms that have total consolidated assets equal to $10 billion or less and total trading assets and liabilities equal to five percent or less of total consolidated assets.

Effective November 24, 2019, the minimum asset threshold for federal savings associations covered by the company-run stress testing requirement was raised from $10 billion to $250 billion in total consolidated assets.

Taxation

Federal ~~Taxation~~

~~General~~

Taxation. The Company and the Bank are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other ~~corporations, with some exceptions discussed below.~~corporations. The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. The Company is no longer subject to federal income tax examination for fiscal years prior to ~~2014.~~

~~Method of Accounting~~

2017. For federal income tax purposes, the Bank currently reports its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a fiscal year ending on September 30 for filing its federal income tax return.

~~Minimum Tax~~

The Internal Revenue Code imposes an alternative minimum tax at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences, called alternative minimum taxable income. The alternative minimum tax is payable Changes to the ~~extent such alternative minimum taxable income is in excess of the regular tax. Certain payments of alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years.~~

~~Net Operating Loss Carryovers~~

~~For~~corporate federal income tax ~~purposes, a financial institution may carryback net operating losses~~rate would result in changes to the ~~preceding two taxable years~~Company's effective income tax rate and ~~forward to the succeeding 20 taxable years. As of September 30, 2017,~~would require the Company ~~had no net operating loss carryovers.~~to remeasure its deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the tax rate in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

State ~~Taxation~~

Taxation. The earnings/losses of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., Capitol Funds, Inc. and ~~Capitol Funds,~~Capital City Investments, Inc. are combined for purposes of filing a consolidated Kansas corporate tax return. The Kansas corporate tax rate is 4.0%, plus a surcharge of 3.0% on earnings greater than $50 thousand.

The Bank files a Kansas privilege tax return. For Kansas privilege tax purposes, the minimum tax rate is 4.5% of earnings, which is calculated based on federal taxable income, subject to certain adjustments. The Bank has not received notification from the state of any potential tax liability for any years still subject to audit.

Additionally, the Bank files state tax returns in various other states where it has significant purchased loans and/or foreclosure activities. In these states, the Bank has either established nexus under an economic nexus theory or has exceeded enumerated nexus thresholds based on the amount of interest derived from sources within the state.

Employees and Human Capital Resources

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, we had a total of ~~708~~793 employees, including ~~126~~125 part-time employees. The full-time equivalent of our total employees at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 was ~~666.~~757. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management considers its employee relations to be good. We believe our ability to attract and retain employees is a key to our success. Accordingly, we strive to offer competitive salaries and employee benefits to all employees and monitor salaries in our market areas. In addition, we are committed to developing our staff through continuing education when applicable and specialty education within banking, using universities that offer Banking Management programs. Leadership development is supported through our Leadership Forum series, on a biannual basis, for mid-level leaders within the organization. We have also used outside consultants for business simulations in the past for training purposes, and this is expected to continue.

Information about our Executive Officers ~~of the Registrant~~

John B. Dicus. Age 5659 years. Mr. Dicus is Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, and President of the Bank and the Company. He has served as Chairman since January 2009 and Chief Executive Officer since January 2003. He has served as President of the Bank since 1996 and of the Company since its predecessor's inception in March 1999. Prior to accepting the responsibilities of Chief Executive Officer, he served as Chief Operating Officer of the Bank and the Company. Prior to that, he served as the Executive Vice President of Corporate Services for the Bank for four years. He has been with the Bank in various other positions since 1985.

Kent G. Townsend. Age 5659 years. Mr. Townsend serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank, its subsidiary, and the Company. Mr. Townsend also serves as Treasurer for the Company, Capitol Funds, Inc. and CFMRC. Mr. Townsend was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on September 1, 2005. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, a position he held since April 1999, and Controller of the Company, a position he held since March 1999. He has served in similar positions with the Bank since September 1995. He served as the Financial Planning and Analysis Officer with the Bank for three years and has held other ~~financial related~~financial-related positions since joining the Bank in 1984.

Rick C. Jackson. Age 5255 years. Mr. Jackson serves as Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer and Community Development Director of the Bank and the Company. He also serves as the ~~President~~Chief Executive Officer of Capitol Funds, Inc., a subsidiary of the Bank, and President of CFMRC. He has been with the Bank since 1993 and has held the position of Community Development Director since that time. He has held the position of Chief Lending Officer since February 2010.

Natalie G. Haag. Age 5861 years. Ms. Haag serves as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Bank and the Company. Prior to joining the Bank and the Company in August of 2012, Ms. Haag was 2nd Vice President, Director of Governmental Affairs and Assistant General Counsel for Security Benefit Corporation and Security Benefit Life Insurance Company in Topeka, Kansas. Security Benefit provides retirement products and services, including annuities and mutual funds. Ms. Haag was employed by Security Benefit since 2003. The Security Benefit companies are not parents, subsidiaries or affiliates of the Bank or the Company.

~~Carlton A. Ricketts~~. Anthony S. Barry. Age 6056 years. Mr. ~~Ricketts~~Barry serves as Executive Vice President, Chief Corporate Services Officer of the Bank and the Company. Prior to ~~accepting those responsibilities~~joining the Bank and the Company in ~~2012, he~~October 2018, Mr. Barry was engaged in the private practice of law for 29 years in real estate and general litigation, with an emphasis in construction law. Mr. Barry also served as ~~Chief Strategic Planning Officer~~a board member of ~~the Bank,~~ a ~~position held since 2007.~~bank holding company in Arizona from 1998 to 2008.

Daniel L. Lehman. Age 5255 years. Mr. Lehman serves as Executive Vice President, Chief Retail Operations Officer of the Bank and Company. Prior to accepting those responsibilities in October 2016, he served as First Vice President and Accounting Director, a position held since May 2003 and Controller, a position held since 2005.

~~Tara~~Robert D. ~~Van Houweling~~.Kobbeman. Age 4465 years. ~~Ms. Van Houweling serves as First Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer and Reporting Director. She has been with~~Mr. Kobbeman joined the Bank and the Company ~~since 2003, has held~~at the ~~position~~time of ~~First~~the acquisition of CCB and serves as Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Banking Officer. Prior to joining the Bank and ~~Reporting Director~~the Company, Mr. Kobbeman was the President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Capital City Bank since ~~2003, and Principal Accounting~~2002. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Kobbeman served as Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer ~~since 2005.~~

of Capital City Bank.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are risks inherent in the Bank's and Company's business. The following is a summary of material risks and uncertainties relating to the operations of the Bank and the Company. Adverse experiences with these could have a material impact on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. Some of these risks and uncertainties are interrelated, and the occurrence of one or more of them may exacerbate the effect of others. These material risks and uncertainties are not necessarily presented in order of significance. In addition to the risks set forth below and the other risks described in this Annual Report, there may ~~also~~ be ~~additional~~ risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

Risks Related to Macroeconomic Conditions

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our customers, employees and business operations has had, and will likely continue to have, a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The COVID-19 pandemic created a global public-health crisis that resulted in challenging economic conditions for households and businesses. The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted a broad range of industries. Many areas of consumer spending have rebounded since the initial onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, but generally not related to travel and entertainment. There is increasing concern about the longer lasting impact on local business, as well as travel and entertainment, resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. There is also concern about resurgences of COVID-19 as we move into the winter months.

The Federal Reserve returned to a zero-interest rate policy in March 2020 and the U.S. government enacted several fiscal stimulus measures to counteract the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and provide economic assistance to businesses and households. The dramatic lowering of market interest rates in a short period of time had an adverse effect on the Company's asset yields. The majority of the fiscal assistance provided by the federal government to businesses and households significantly tapered off by September 30, 2020, which could adversely impact the ability of borrowers to repay their loans. The Company's financial performance is dependent upon the ability of borrowers to repay their loans.

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in changes to our business operations during the current year and could continue to result in changes to operations in future periods. Depending on the severity and length of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is impossible to predict, we could experience significant disruptions in our business operations if key personnel or a significant number of employees were to become unavailable due to the effects of, and restrictions resulting from, the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as decreased demand for our products and services.

There is pervasive uncertainty surrounding the future economic conditions that will emerge in the months and years following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, management is confronted with a significant and unfamiliar degree of uncertainty in estimating the impact of the pandemic on credit quality, revenues and asset values. Asset quality may deteriorate and the amount of our ACL may not be sufficient for future loan losses we may experience. This could require us to increase our reserves and recognize more expense in future periods. The changes in market rates of interest and the impact that has on our ability to price our products may reduce our net interest income in the future or negatively impact the demand for our products. There is some risk that operational costs could continue to increase as we maintain existing facilities in accordance with health guidelines as well as potentially have staff work remotely.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our regulatory capital and liquidity ratios, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic.

Changes in interest rates could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our results of operations are primarily dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest earned on loans, securities, cash at the Federal Reserve Bank and dividends received on FHLB stock, and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Changes in interest rates could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition because the majority of our interest-earning assets are long-term, fixed-rate loans, while the majority of our interest-bearing liabilities are shorter term, and therefore subject to a greater degree of interest rate fluctuations. This type of risk is known as interest rate risk and is affected by prevailing economic and competitive conditions, including monetary policies of the FRB and fiscal policies of the United States federal government.

The impact of changes in interest rates is generally observed on the income statement. The magnitude of the impact will be determined by the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, both of which either reprice or mature within a given period of time. This difference provides an indication of the extent to which our net interest rate spread will be impacted by changes in interest rates. In addition, changes in interest rates will impact the expected level of repricing of the Bank's mortgage-related assets and callable debt securities. Generally, as interest rates decline, the amount of interest-earning assets expected to reprice will increase as borrowers have an economic incentive to reduce the cost of their mortgage or debt, which would negatively impact the Bank's interest income. Conversely, as interest rates rise, the amount of interest-earning assets expected to reprice will decline as the economic incentive to refinance the mortgage or debt is diminished. As this occurs, the amount of interest-earning assets repricing could diminish to the point where interest-bearing liabilities reprice to a higher interest rate at a faster pace than interest-earning assets, thus negatively impacting the Bank's net interest income.

Changes in interest rates can also have an adverse effect on our financial condition as AFS securities are reported at estimated fair value. We increase or decrease our stockholders' equity, specifically AOCI (loss), by the amount of change in the estimated fair value of our AFS securities, net of deferred taxes. Increases in interest rates generally decrease the fair value of AFS securities. Decreases in the fair value of AFS securities would, therefore, adversely impact stockholders' equity.

Changes in interest rates, as they relate to customers, can also have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In times of rising interest rates, default risk may increase among borrowers with ~~ARM~~adjustable-rate loans as the rates on their loans adjust upward and their payments increase. Fluctuations in interest rates also affect customer demand for deposit products. Local competition could affect our ability to attract deposits, or could result in us paying more than competitors for deposits.

As was announced in July 2017, LIBOR is anticipated to be phased out and replaced by a new index by the end of 2021. As of September 30, 2017, the Bank's loan portfolio included $812.8 million of ARM loans for which the repricing index was tied to LIBOR. Additionally, the Bank has interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $200.0 million tied to LIBOR. Our loan agreements generally allow the Bank to choose a new index based upon comparable information if the current index is no longer available. The use of a new index could reduce our interest income and therefore have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Management continues to monitor the status and discussions regarding LIBOR.

In addition to general changes in interest rates, changes that affect the shape of the yield curve could negatively impact the Bank. The Bank's interest-bearing liabilities are generally priced based on short-term interest rates while the majority of the Bank's interest-earning assets are priced based on long-term interest rates. Income for the Bank is primarily driven by the spread between these rates. As a result, a steeper yield curve, meaning long-term interest rates are significantly higher than short-term interest rates, would provide the Bank with a better opportunity to increase net interest income. When the yield curve is flat, meaning long-term interest rates and short-term interest rates are essentially the same, or when the yield curve is inverted, meaning long-term interest rates are lower than short-term interest rates, the yield between interest-earning assets

and interest-bearing liabilities that reprice is compressed or diminished and would likely negatively impact the Bank's net interest income. See "Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" for additional information about the Bank's interest rate risk management.

An economic downturn, especially one affecting our geographic market areas and certain regions of the country where we have correspondent loans secured by one- to four-family properties, could adversely impact our business and financial results.

Our primary lending emphasis is the origination and purchase of one- to four-family first mortgage loans secured by residential properties; therefore, we are particularly exposed to downturns in regional housing markets and, to a lesser extent, the U.S. housing market, along with changes in the levels of unemployment or underemployment. We monitor the current status and trends of local and national employment levels and trends and current conditions in the real estate and housing markets in our local market areas and certain areas where we have correspondent loans secured by one- to four-family properties. Adverse conditions in our local economies and in certain areas where we have correspondent loans secured by one- to four-family properties, such as inflation, unemployment, recession, natural disasters or pandemics, or other factors beyond our control, could impact the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. Any one or a combination of these events may have an adverse impact on borrowers' ability to repay their loans, which could result in increased delinquencies, non-

performing assets, loan losses, and future loan loss provisions. Decreases in local real estate values could adversely affect the value of the property used as collateral for our loans, which could cause us to realize a loss in the event of a foreclosure.

Risks Related to Lending Activities

The increase in commercial loans in our loan portfolio exposes us to increased lending and credit risks, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.

A growing portion of our loan portfolio consists of commercial loans. These loan types tend to be larger than and in different geographic regions from most of our existing loan portfolio and are generally considered to have different and greater risks than one- to four-family residential real estate loans and may involve multiple loans to groups of related borrowers. A growing commercial loan portfolio also subjects us to greater regulatory scrutiny. Furthermore, these loan types can expose us to a greater risk of delinquencies, non-performing assets, loan losses, and future loan loss provisions than one- to four-family residential real estate loans because repayment of such loans often depends on the successful operation of a business or of the underlying property. Repayment of such loans may be affected by factors outside the borrower's control, such as adverse conditions in the real estate market, the economy, environmental factors, natural disasters or pandemics, and/or changes in government regulation. Also, there are risks inherent in commercial real estate construction lending as the value of the project is uncertain prior to the completion of construction and subsequent lease-up. A sudden downturn in the economy or other unforeseen events could result in stalled projects or collateral shortfalls, thus exposing us to increased credit risk.

Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the collateral underlying the loans. The borrowers' cash flow may prove to be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most often, this collateral consists of accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Significant adverse changes in a borrower's industries and businesses could cause rapid declines in values of, and collectability associated with, those business assets, which could result in inadequate collateral coverage for our commercial and industrial loans and expose us to future losses. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its clients. Inventory and equipment may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, may be illiquid and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. If the cash flow from business operations is reduced, the borrower's ability to repay the loan may be impaired. An increase in valuation allowances and charge-offs related to our commercial and industrial loan portfolio could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

If our ACL is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, it could adversely impact our financial results.

We make several assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the ACL that is adequate to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio, management analyzes and considers several elements, such as current economic conditions, loan modification programs and activity, performance of our loan portfolio, loan growth and concentrations, and industry and peer charge-off and ACL information. If actual results differ significantly from our assumptions, our ACL may not be sufficient to cover inherent losses in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions to our ACL and an increase in the provision for credit losses. Bank regulators also periodically review our loan portfolio, the ACL, and our assumptions underlying the determinations we have made regarding the ACL, and as a result may require us to increase our ACL and/or recognize additional loan charge-offs, both resulting in an increase in the provision for credit losses.

We may be required to provide remedial consideration to borrowers whose loans we purchase from correspondent and nationwide lenders if it is discovered that the originating company did not properly comply with lending regulations during the origination process.

noncompliance occurred by the originating company during the origination process, the Bank may still be held responsible and required to remedy the issue for the loans it purchased from the originator. Remedial actions can include refunding interest paid by the borrower and adjusting the contractual interest rate on the loan to the current market rate if advantageous to the borrower. The Bank no longer purchases loans in bulk from nationwide lenders due primarily to these risks.

The expected discontinuation of LIBOR, and the identification and use of alternative replacement reference rates, may adversely affect our results of operations and subject the Company to litigation risk.

LIBOR is used extensively in the United States as a reference rate for various financial contracts, including adjustable-rate loans, asset-backed securities, and interest rate swaps. In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. The announcement means the continuation of LIBOR cannot be guaranteed after 2021.

In the United States, the Alternative Reference Rate Committee ("ARRC"), a group of diverse private-market participants assembled by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, was tasked with identifying alternative reference interest rates to replace LIBOR. The Secured Overnight Finance Rate ("SOFR") has emerged as the ARRC's preferred alternative rate for LIBOR. SOFR is a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities in the repurchase agreement market. At this time, it is not possible to predict how markets will respond to SOFR or other alternative reference rates as the transition away from LIBOR is anticipated to be gradual over the coming years.

The Company has formed a LIBOR steering committee composed of individuals from lending, compliance/risk, treasury and legal. The LIBOR steering committee has been charged with overseeing the coordination of the Company's enterprise-wide LIBOR transition program and evaluating and mitigating the risks associated with the transition from LIBOR. The LIBOR transition program includes a comprehensive review by management of the financial products, agreements, contracts and business processes that may use LIBOR as a reference rate. As financial products, agreements, contracts and business processes that use LIBOR are identified, the LIBOR steering committee works with management to develop a strategy to transition away from LIBOR. During the strategy development process, management and the LIBOR steering committee considers the financial, customer/counterparty, regulatory and legal impacts of all proposed strategies.

As of September 30, 2020, the Company has identified $500.7 million of adjustable-rate one- to four-family loans for which the repricing index was tied to LIBOR and the loan maturity date is after December 31, 2021. Our one- to four-family loan agreements generally allow the Bank to choose a new alternative reference rate based upon comparable information if the current index is no longer available. During the June 30, 2019 quarter, the Bank discontinued the use of LIBOR for the origination of adjustable-rate one- to four-family loans and no longer purchases correspondent one- to four-family loans that use LIBOR. The Bank began using the one-year CMT index for newly originated and correspondent purchased one- to four-family adjustable-rate loans. At September 30, 2020, none of the Bank's consumer or commercial loans use a repricing index tied to LIBOR. The Bank has interest rate swaps maturing after December 31, 2021 with a notional amount of $465.0 million at September 30, 2020 that are tied to LIBOR. The Bank's swap agreements are governed by the International Swap Dealers Association ("ISDA"). ISDA is in the process of developing fallback language for swap agreements and is expected to establish a protocol to allow counterparties to modify legacy trades to include the new fallback language.

The market transition away from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate is complex. If LIBOR rates are no longer available, and we are required to implement replacement reference rates for the calculation of interest rates under our loan agreements with borrowers, we may incur significant expense in effecting the transition and we may be subject to disputes or litigation with our borrowers over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the replacement reference rates. The replacement reference rates could also result in a reduction in our interest income. We may also receive inquiries and other actions from regulators in respect to the Company's preparation and readiness for the replacement of LIBOR with alternative reference rates.

Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Third Parties, and Technology

The occurrence of any information system failure or interruption, breach of security or cyber-attack, at the Company, at its third-party service providers or counterparties may have an adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition or results of operations.

Information systems are essential to the conduct of our business, as we use such systems to manage our customer relationships, our general ledger, our deposits and our loans. In the normal course of our business, we collect, process, retain and transmit (by email and other electronic means) sensitive and confidential information regarding our customers, employees and others. We also outsource certain aspects of our data processing, data processing operations, remote network monitoring, engineering and managed security services to third-party service providers. In addition to confidential information regarding our customers, employees and others, we, and in some cases a third party, compile, process, transmit and store proprietary, non-public information concerning our business, operations, plans and strategies.

Information security risks for financial institutions continue to increase in part because of evolving technologies, the use of the Internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and others. Cyber criminals use a variety of tactics, such as ransomware, denial of service, and theft of sensitive business and customer information to extort payment or other concessions from victims. In some cases, these attacks have caused significant impacts on other businesses' access to data and ability to provide services. We are not able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all incidents of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources.

We use a variety of physical, procedural and technological safeguards to prevent or limit the impact of system failures, interruptions and security breaches and to protect confidential information from mishandling, misuse or loss, including detection and response mechanisms designed to contain and mitigate security incidents. However, there can be no assurance that such events will not occur or that they will be promptly detected and adequately addressed if they do, and early detection of security breaches may be thwarted by sophisticated attacks and malware designed to avoid detection. If there is a failure in or breach of our information systems, or those of a third-party service provider, the confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, such information systems could ~~potentially~~ be jeopardized, or could otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or the operations of our customers, employees, or others.

Our business and operations depend on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our information systems and those of our third-party service providers. Although we devote significant resources and management focus to ensuring the integrity of our information systems through information security measures, risk management practices, relationships with threat intelligence providers and business continuity planning, our facilities, computer systems, software and networks, and those of our third-party service providers, may be vulnerable to external or internal security breaches, acts of vandalism, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code and ~~cyber attacks~~cyber-attacks that could have a security impact. In addition, breaches of security may occur through intentional or unintentional acts by those having authorized or unauthorized access to our confidential or other information or the confidential or other information of our customers, employees or others. While we regularly conduct security and risk assessments on our systems and those of our third-party service providers, there can be no assurance that their information security protocols are sufficient to withstand a cyber-attack or other security breach. Across our industry, the cost of minimizing these risks and investigating incidents has continued to increase with the frequency and sophistication of these threats. To date, the Company has no knowledge of a material information security breach affecting its systems.

The occurrence of any of the foregoing could subject us to litigation or regulatory scrutiny, cause us significant reputational damage or erode confidence in the security of our information systems, products and services, cause us to lose customers or have greater difficulty in attracting new customers, have an adverse effect on the value of our common stock or subject us to financial losses that may not be covered by insurance, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. As information security risks and cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to further enhance or modify our information security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks.

Furthermore, there ~~has recently been~~continues to be heightened legislative and regulatory focus on privacy, data protection and information security. New or revised laws and regulations may significantly impact our current and planned privacy, data protection and

information security-related practices, the collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer and employee information, and current or planned business activities. Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection and information security laws could result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict our ability to provide certain products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our customers are also ~~the target~~targets of cyber-attacks and identity theft. There ~~have been several recent~~continues to be instances involving financial services and consumer-based companies reporting the unauthorized disclosure of client or customer information or the destruction or theft of corporate data. Large scale identity theft could result in customers' accounts being compromised and fraudulent activities being performed in their name. We have implemented certain safeguards against these types of activities but they may not fully protect us from fraudulent financial losses. The occurrence of a breach of security involving our customers' information, regardless of its origin, could damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, and could expose us to litigation and possible financial liability. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

~~An economic downturn, especially one affecting our geographic market area~~Third party vendors subject the Company to potential business, reputation and financial risks.

Third party vendors are sources of operational and information security risk to the Company, including risks associated with operations errors, information system interruptions or breaches, and unauthorized disclosures of sensitive or confidential customer information. The Company requires third party vendors to maintain certain ~~regions~~levels of ~~the country where~~information security; however, vendors may remain vulnerable to breaches, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses, and/or other malicious attacks that could ultimately compromise sensitive information. We have developed procedures and processes for selecting and monitoring third party vendors, but ultimately we are dependent on these third party vendors to secure their information. If these vendors encounter any of these types of issues, or if we have ~~correspondent loans,~~difficulty communicating with them, we could ~~adversely impact~~be exposed to disruption of operations, loss of service or connectivity to customers, reputational damage, and litigation risk that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The failure of an external vendor to perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements, because of changes in the vendor's organizational structure, financial condition, support for existing products and services or strategic focus or for any other reason, could be disruptive to our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and, in turn, our financial ~~results.~~condition and results of operations. Additionally, replacing certain third party vendors could also entail significant delay and expense.

Our primary lending emphasis is the origination and purchase of one- to four-family first mortgage loans on residential properties; therefore, we are particularly exposed to downturns in regional housing markets and, to a lesser extent, the U.S. housing market, along with changes in the levels of unemployment or underemployment. We monitor the current status and trends of local and national employment levels and trends and current conditions in the real estate and housing markets in our local market areas and certain areas where we have correspondent loans. Adverse conditions in our local economies and in certain areas where we have correspondent loans, such as inflation, unemployment, recession, natural disasters, or other factors beyond our control, could impact the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. Any one or a combination of these events may have an adverse impact on borrowers' ability to repay their loans, which could result in increased delinquencies, non-performing assets, loan losses, and future loan loss provisions. Decreases in local real estate values could adversely affect the value of the property used as collateral for our loans, which could cause us to realize a loss in the event of a foreclosure.

~~The increase in commercial real estate loans in our loan portfolio exposes us to increased lending and credit risks.~~

A growing portion of our loan portfolio consists of commercial real estate loans. These loan types tend to be larger than and in different geographic regions from most of our existing loan portfolio and are generally considered to have different and greater risks than one- to four-family residential real estate loans. Furthermore, these loan types can expose us to a greater risk of delinquencies, non-performing assets, loan losses, and future loan loss provisions than one- to four-family residential real estate loans because repayment of such loans often depends on the successful operations of a business or of the underlying property. Repayment of such loans may be affected by factors outside the borrower's control, such as adverse conditions in the real estate market, the economy, environmental factors, natural disasters, and/or changes in government regulation. Also, there are risks inherent in commercial real estate construction lending as the value of the project is uncertain prior to the completion of construction and subsequent lease-up. A sudden downturn in the economy or other unforeseen events could result in stalled projects or collateral shortfalls, thus exposing us to increased credit risk. Additionally, a large portion of our commercial real estate loans were originated/participated in during the past four fiscal years, which makes it difficult to assess the future performance of these loans because of the borrowers' relatively limited income history and loan payment history.

Our commercial real estate loans generally have significantly larger average loan balances compared to one- to four-family residential real estate loans and may involve multiple loans to groups of related borrowers. Our largest commercial real estate loan was $50.0 million at September 30, 2017, of which $35.9 million had been disbursed at September 30, 2017.

A growing commercial real estate loan portfolio subjects us to greater regulatory scrutiny. Regulatory agencies have observed that many commercial markets are experiencing substantial growth, and as a result, concentration levels of commercial loans have been rising at some institutions.

We regularly monitor the risks in our commercial real estate loan portfolio, including concentrations in such factors as geographic locations, property types, tenant brand name, borrowing relationships, and lending relationships in the case of participation loans, among other factors. We continually strive to maintain high underwriting standards, including selecting borrowers and guarantors that are financially sound and experienced in the industry, and selecting projects that meet the Bank's lending policies and risk appetite. The properties securing our commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location. This diversity helps reduce our exposure to adverse economic events, environmental factors and natural disasters that may affect any single market or industry. For additional information regarding our commercial real estate underwriting and monitoring of risk, see "Part 1, Item 1. Business - Lending Practices and Underwriting Standards - Commercial Real Estate Lending."

We are heavily reliant on technology, and a failure to effectively implement technology initiatives or anticipate future technology needs or demands could adversely affect our business or performance.

Like most financial institutions, the Bank significantly depends on technology to deliver its products and other services and to otherwise conduct business. To remain technologically competitive and operationally efficient, the Bank invests in system upgrades, new technological solutions, and other technology initiatives. Many of these solutions and initiatives have a significant duration, are tied to critical information systems, and require substantial resources. Although the Bank takes steps to mitigate the risks and uncertainties associated with these solutions and initiatives, there is no guarantee that they will be implemented on time, within budget, or without negative operational or customer impact. The Bank also may not succeed in anticipating its future technology needs, the technology demands of its customers, or the competitive landscape for technology. If the Bank were to falter in any of these areas, it could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~We may be required~~Risks Related to provide remedial consideration to borrowers whose loans we purchase from correspondent and nationwide lenders if it is discovered that the originating company did not properly comply with lending regulations during the origination process.Competition

We purchase whole one- to four-family loans from correspondent and nationwide lenders. While loans purchased on a loan-by-loan basis from correspondent lenders are underwritten by the Bank's underwriters and loans purchased in bulk packages from correspondent and nationwide lenders are evaluated on a certain set of criteria before being purchased, we are still subject to some risks associated with the loan origination process itself. By law, loan originators are required to comply with lending regulations at all times during the origination process. Even though the Bank can contractually pursue the originating company, certain compliance related risks associated with the origination process itself may shift from the originating company to the Bank once the Bank purchases the loan. Should it be discovered, at any point, that an instance of noncompliance occurred by the originating company during the origination process, the Bank may still be held responsible and required to remedy the issue for the loans it purchased from the originator. Remedial actions can include refunding interest paid to the borrower and adjusting the contractual interest rate on the loan to the current market rate if advantageous to the borrower. The Bank no longer purchases loans in bulk from nationwide lenders due primarily to these risks.

Strong competition may limit growth and profitability.

While we are one of the largest mortgage loan originators in the state of Kansas, we compete in the same market areas as local, regional, and national banks, credit unions, mortgage brokerage firms, investment banking firms, investment brokerage firms, and savings institutions. We ~~must~~ also compete with online investment and mortgage brokerages and online banks that are not confined to any specific market area. Many of these competitors operate on a national or regional level, are a conglomerate of various financial services providers housed under one corporation, or otherwise have substantially greater financial or technological resources than the Bank. We compete primarily on the basis of the interest rates offered to depositors, the terms of loans offered to borrowers, and the benefits afforded to customers as a local institution and portfolio lender. Our pricing strategy for loan and deposit products includes setting interest rates based on secondary market prices

and local competitor pricing for our local markets, and secondary market prices and national competitor pricing for our correspondent lending markets. Should we face competitive pressure to increase deposit rates or decrease loan rates, our net interest income could be adversely affected. Additionally, our competitors may offer products and services that we do not or cannot provide, as certain deposit and loan products fall outside of our accepted level of risk. Our profitability depends upon our ability to compete in our local market areas.

Risks Related to Regulation

We operate in a highly regulated environment which limits the manner and scope of our business activities and we may be adversely affected by new and/or changes in laws and regulations or interpretation of existing laws and regulations.

We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and examination by the OCC, FRB, and the FDIC. These regulatory authorities exercise broad discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the ability to impose restrictions on a bank's operations, reclassify assets, determine the adequacy of a bank's ACL, and determine the level of deposit insurance premiums assessed. The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws, including a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, like the authority to prohibit "unfair, deceptive or abusive" acts and practices. The CFPB also has examination and enforcement authority over all banks with regulatory assets exceeding $10 billion at four consecutive quarter-ends. The Bank has not exceeded $10 billion in regulatory assets at four consecutive quarter-ends, but it may at some point in the future. Smaller banks, like the Bank, will continue to be examined for compliance with the consumer laws and regulations of the CFPB by their primary bank regulators (the OCC, in the case of the Bank). The Dodd-Frank Act also weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce federal consumer protection laws.

Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation, interpretation or application, could have a material adverse impact on our operations. Moreover, bank regulatory agencies have been active in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations, and have issued ~~many~~ formal enforcement orders requiring capital ratios in excess of regulatory requirements and/or assessing monetary penalties. Bank regulatory agencies, such as the OCC and the FDIC, govern the activities in which we may engage, primarily for the protection of depositors, and not for the protection or benefit of investors. The CFPB enforces consumer protection laws and regulations for the benefit of the consumer and not the protection or benefit of investors. In addition, new laws and regulations may continue to increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business, and otherwise affect our operations. New laws and regulations may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the markets for and value of our loans and securities, the products we offer, the fees we can charge and our ongoing operations, costs, and profitability.

The Company is also directly subject to the requirements of entities that set and interpret the accounting standards such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and indirectly subject to the actions and interpretations of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which establishes auditing and related professional practice standards for registered public accounting firms and inspects registered firms to assess their compliance with certain laws, rules, and professional standards in public company audits. These regulations, along with the currently existing tax, accounting, securities, and monetary laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies and interpretations, control the methods by which financial institutions and their holding companies conduct business, engage in strategic and tax planning, implement strategic initiatives, and govern financial reporting.

The Company's failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in civil or criminal sanctions and money penalties by state and federal agencies, and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Part I, Item 1. Business - Regulation and Supervision" for more information about the regulations to which the Company is subject.

Other Risks

The Company's ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of the Bank to make capital distributions to the Company.

The long-term ability of the Company to pay dividends to its stockholders is based primarily upon the ability of the Bank to make capital distributions to the Company, and also on the availability of cash at the holding company level in the event earnings are not sufficient to pay dividends. Under certain circumstances, capital distributions from the Bank to the Company may be subject to regulatory approvals. See "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions" for additional information.

Our ~~risk-management~~risk- management and compliance programs and functions may not be effective in mitigating risk and loss.

We maintain an enterprise risk management program that is designed to identify, quantify, monitor, report, and control the risks that we face. These risks include: interest-rate, credit, liquidity, operations, reputation, compliance and litigation. We also maintain a compliance program to identify, measure, assess, and report on our adherence to applicable laws, policies and procedures. While we assess and improve these programs on an ongoing basis, there can be no assurance that our risk management or compliance programs, along with other related controls, will effectively mitigate all risk and limit losses in our business. If conditions or circumstances arise that expose flaws or gaps in our risk management or compliance programs, or if our controls do not function as designed, the performance and value of our business could be adversely affected.

The Company may not attract and retain skilled employees.

The Company's success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people can be intense, and the Company spends considerable time and resources attracting and hiring qualified people for its operations. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of the Company's key personnel could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business because of their skills, knowledge of the Company's market, and years of industry experience, as well as the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, we had 3745 traditional branch offices and 109 in-store branch offices. The Bank owns the office building and related land in which its home office and executive offices are located, and 2834 of its other branch offices. The remaining 1819 branches are either leased or partially owned.

For additional information regarding our lease obligations, see "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note ~~5. Premises and Equipment, net.~~18. Leases."

Management believes that our current facilities are adequate to meet our present and immediately foreseeable needs. However, we will continue to monitor customer growth and expand our branching network, if necessary, to serve our customers' needs.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company and the Bank are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, we believe it unlikely that such pending legal actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

~~None.~~Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Stock Listing

Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. common stock is traded on the Global Select tier of the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol "CFFN". At November ~~22, 2017,~~19, 2020, there were approximately ~~9,624~~8,539 Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. stockholders of record.

~~Price Range of Common Stock~~

~~The high and low sales prices for the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market, as well as dividends declared per share, are reflected in the table below.~~

FISCAL YEAR 2017 HIGH LOW DIVIDENDS
First Quarter $ 17.04
$ 13.82
$ 0.375
Second Quarter 16.98
14.17
0.085
Third Quarter 15.07
13.55
0.335
Fourth Quarter 14.94
13.21
0.085

FISCAL YEAR 2016 HIGH LOW DIVIDENDS
First Quarter $ 13.36
$ 11.82
$ 0.335
Second Quarter 13.47
11.39
0.085
Third Quarter 13.95
12.70
0.335
Fourth Quarter 14.49
13.52
0.085

Share Repurchases

On October 28, 2015, the Company announced a stock repurchase plan for up to $70.0 million of common stock. ~~The~~During the current fiscal year, the Company repurchased $23.8 million, or 2,558,100 shares, of common stock. As of September 30, 2020, there was still $46.2 million authorized under the existing stock repurchase plan ~~does not have~~for additional purchases of the Company's common stock. Subsequent to September 30, 2020 through November 24, 2020, the Company repurchased an additional $1.5 million, or 164,400 shares, of common stock. This plan has no expiration ~~date.~~date; however, the Federal Reserve Bank's approval for the Company to repurchase shares extends through August 2021. Since the Company completed its second-step conversion in December 2010, ~~$368.0~~$393.4 million worth of shares of common stock have been repurchased.

The following table summarizes our share repurchase activity during the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and additional information regarding our share repurchase program.


				Total Number of	Approximate Dollar
	Total			Shares Purchased as	Value of Shares
	Number of	Average		Part of Publicly	that May Yet Be
	Shares	Price Paid		Announced Plans	Purchased Under the
	Purchased	per Share		or Programs	Plans or Programs
July 1, 2020 through
July 31, 2020	—	$	—	—	$	70,000,000
August 1, 2020 through
August 31, 2020	—	—		—	70,000,000
September 1, 2020 through
September 30, 2020	2,558,100	9.31		2,558,100	46,196,180
Total	2,558,100	9.31		2,558,100	46,196,180

Approximate
Total Total Number of Dollar Value of
Number of Average Shares Purchased as Shares that May
Shares Price Paid Part of Publicly Yet Be Purchased
Purchased per Share Announced Plans Under the Plan
July 1, 2017 through
July 31, 2017 —
$ —
—
$ 70,000,000
August 1, 2017 through
August 31, 2017 —
—
—
70,000,000
September 1, 2017 through
September 30, 2017 —
—
—
70,000,000
Total —
—
—
70,000,000

Stockholders and General Inquiries

Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020 are available to stockholders at no charge in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.capfed.com.

Stockholder Return Performance Presentation

The information presented below assumes $100 invested on September 30, ~~2012~~2015 in the Company's common stock and in each of the indices, and assumes the reinvestment of all dividends. Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.


	Period Ending							Period Ending
Index	9/30/2012	9/30/2013	9/30/2014	9/30/2015	9/30/2016	9/30/2017	Index	9/30/2015	9/30/2016	9/30/2017	9/30/2018	9/30/2019	9/30/2020
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.	100.00	113.03	116.48	127.84	158.20	175.20	Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.	100.00	123.80	137.11	127.06	148.12	104.91
NASDAQ Composite Index	100.00	122.77	148.08	153.99	179.29	221.75	NASDAQ Composite Index	100.00	116.42	144.00	180.24	181.19	255.40
SNL U.S. Bank & Thrift Index	100.00	130.10	153.33	156.54	161.85	227.64	SNL U.S. Bank & Thrift Index	100.00	103.39	145.42	156.32	154.40	113.66

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence

Restrictions on the Payments of Dividends

The Company's ability to pay dividends is dependent, in part, upon its ability to obtain capital distributions from the Bank. The dividend policy of the Company is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including the Company's financial condition and results of operations, regulatory capital requirements, regulatory limitations on the Bank's ability to make capital distributions to the Company, and the amount of cash at the holding company level. See "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions" for additional information regarding the Company's ability to pay dividends.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The summary information presented below under "Selected Balance Sheet Data" and "Selected Operations Data" for, and as of the end of, each of the years ended September 30 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The following information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements.


	At September 30,
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets	$	9,487,218	$	9,340,018	$	9,449,547	$	9,192,916	$	9,267,247
Loans receivable, net	7,202,851		7,416,747		7,514,485		7,195,071		6,958,024
Securities:
AFS	1,560,950		1,204,863		714,614		415,831		527,301
HTM	—		—		612,318		827,738		1,100,874
FHLB stock	93,862		98,456		99,726		100,954		109,970
Deposits	6,191,408		5,581,867		5,603,354		5,309,868		5,164,018
Borrowings	1,789,313		2,239,989		2,285,033		2,373,808		2,572,389
Stockholders' equity	1,284,859		1,336,326		1,391,622		1,368,313		1,392,964


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016
	(Dollars and counts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Selected Operations Data:
Total interest and dividend income	$	304,978	$	329,954	$	321,892	$	313,186	$	301,113
Total interest expense	115,643		123,564		123,119		117,804		108,931
Net interest and dividend income	189,335		206,390		198,773		195,382		192,182
Provision for credit losses	22,300		750		—		—		(750)
Net interest and dividend income after
provision for credit losses	167,035		205,640		198,773		195,382		192,932
Deposit service fees	11,285		12,740		15,636		15,053		14,835
Other non-interest income	8,314		9,218		6,399		7,143		8,477
Total non-interest income	19,599		21,958		22,035		22,196		23,312
Salaries and employee benefits	52,996		53,145		46,563		43,437		42,378
Other non-interest expense	53,008		53,799		50,339		46,221		51,927
Total non-interest expense	106,004		106,944		96,902		89,658		94,305
Income before income tax expense	80,630		120,654		123,906		127,920		121,939
Income tax expense	16,090		26,411		24,979		43,783		38,445
Net income	$	64,540	$	94,243	$	98,927	$	84,137	$	83,494

Basic earnings per share	$	0.47	$	0.68	$	0.73	$	0.63	$	0.63
Average basic shares outstanding	137,897		137,677		134,698		134,082		133,045
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.47	$	0.68	$	0.73	$	0.63	$	0.63
Average diluted shares outstanding	137,901		137,735		134,759		134,244		133,176

September 30,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets $ 9,192,916
$ 9,267,247
$ 9,844,161
$ 9,865,028
$ 9,186,449
Loans receivable, net 7,195,071
6,958,024
6,625,027
6,233,170
5,958,868
Securities:
AFS 415,831
527,301
758,171
840,790
1,069,967
HTM 827,738
1,100,874
1,271,122
1,552,699
1,718,023
FHLB stock 100,954
109,970
150,543
213,054
128,530
Deposits 5,309,868
5,164,018
4,832,520
4,655,272
4,611,446
FHLB borrowings 2,173,808
2,372,389
3,270,521
3,369,677
2,513,538
Repurchase agreements 200,000
200,000
200,000
220,000
320,000
Stockholders' equity 1,368,313
1,392,964
1,416,226
1,492,882
1,632,126


	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets(1)	0.69		%	0.99		%	0.94		%	0.75		%	0.74		%
Return on average equity(1)	4.92			6.94			7.25			6.09			5.95
Dividends paid per share	$	0.68		$	0.98		$	0.88		$	0.88		$	0.84
Dividend payout ratio	145.43		%	143.17		%	119.60		%	140.20		%	133.86		%
Operating expense ratio	1.13			1.12			0.92			0.80			0.84
Efficiency ratio(1)	50.74			46.83			43.89			41.21			43.76
Ratio of average interest-earning assets
to average interest-bearing liabilities	1.13x			1.14x			1.13x			1.12x			1.13x
Net interest margin(1)	2.12		%	2.26		%	1.95		%	1.79		%	1.75		%

Interest rate spread information:
Average during period(1)	1.94			2.07			1.80			1.66			1.63
End of period	1.92			2.04			2.18			2.04			1.92

Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing assets to total assets	0.13			0.10			0.14			0.20			0.35
Non-performing loans to total loans	0.17			0.10			0.15			0.23			0.42
ACL to non-performing loans	252.42			121.99			77.01			50.58			29.32
ACL to loans receivable, net	0.44			0.12			0.11			0.12			0.12

Capital Ratios:
Equity to total assets at end of period	13.5			14.3			14.7			14.9			15.0
Average equity to average assets	14.0			14.3			13.0			12.4			12.4
Company CBLR/Tier 1 leverage ratio(2)	13.7			13.8			14.9			12.3			12.3
Bank CBLR/Tier 1 leverage ratio(2)	12.4			12.1			13.0			10.8			10.9

Other Data:
Number of traditional offices	45			44			48			37			37
Number of in-store offices	9			10			10			10			10

(1)The table below provides a reconciliation between certain performance ratios presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and those same performance ratios excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, which are not presented in accordance with GAAP. Management believes it is important for comparability purposes to provide the performance ratios without the leverage strategy because of its unique nature. The leverage strategy reduces some of our performance ratios, even though it increases our net income, due to the small amount of earnings associated with the transaction in comparison to the size of the transaction. The leverage strategy was not in place during the current fiscal year due to the negative interest rate spreads between the related FHLB borrowings and cash held at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City ("FRB of Kansas City"), making the transaction unprofitable.


		For the Year Ended September 30,
	2019			2018
		Actual		Leverage		Non-		Actual		Leverage		Non-
		(GAAP)		Strategy		GAAP		(GAAP)		Strategy		GAAP
Return on average assets		0.99	%	(0.02)	%	1.01	%	0.94	%	(0.13)	%	1.07	%
Return on average equity		6.94		—		6.94		7.25		0.13		7.12
Efficiency ratio		46.83		—		46.83		43.89		(0.30)		44.19
Net interest margin		2.26		(0.04)		2.30		1.95		(0.29)		2.24
Average interest rate spread		2.07		(0.03)		2.10		1.80		(0.26)		2.06


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2017						2016
	Actual		Leverage		Non-		Actual		Leverage		Non-
	(GAAP)		Strategy		GAAP		(GAAP)		Strategy		GAAP
Return on average assets	0.75	%	(0.14)	%	0.89	%	0.74	%	(0.14)	%	0.88	%
Return on average equity	6.09		0.21		5.88		5.95		0.17		5.78
Efficiency ratio	41.21		(0.63)		41.84		43.76		(0.42)		44.18
Net interest margin	1.79		(0.36)		2.15		1.75		(0.35)		2.10
Average interest rate spread	1.66		(0.32)		1.98		1.63		(0.30)		1.93

(2)The Tier 1 leverage ratio was replaced with the CBLR when the Bank and Company elected to use the CBLR framework beginning in fiscal year 2020. See "Part I, Item 1. Business - Regulation and Supervision - Regulatory Capital Requirements" for additional information regarding the CBLR.

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
(Dollars and counts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Selected Operations Data:
Total interest and dividend income $ 313,186
$ 301,113
$ 297,362
$ 290,246
$ 298,554
Total interest expense 117,804
108,931
107,594
106,103
120,394
Net interest and dividend income 195,382
192,182
189,768
184,143
178,160
Provision for credit losses —
(750 ) 771
1,409
(1,067 )
Net interest and dividend income after
provision for credit losses 195,382
192,932
188,997
182,734
179,227
Retail fees and charges 15,053
14,835
14,897
14,937
15,342
Other non-interest income 7,143
8,477
6,243
8,018
7,947
Total non-interest income 22,196
23,312
21,140
22,955
23,289
Salaries and employee benefits 43,437
42,378
43,309
43,757
49,152
Other non-interest expense 46,221
51,927
51,060
46,780
47,795
Total non-interest expense 89,658
94,305
94,369
90,537
96,947
Income before income tax expense 127,920
121,939
115,768
115,152
105,569
Income tax expense 43,783
38,445
37,675
37,458
36,229
Net income $ 84,137
$ 83,494
$ 78,093
$ 77,694
$ 69,340

Basic earnings per share $ 0.63
$ 0.63
$ 0.58
$ 0.56
$ 0.48
Average basic shares outstanding 134,082
133,045
135,384
139,440
144,847
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.63
$ 0.63
$ 0.58
$ 0.56
$ 0.48
Average diluted shares outstanding 134,244
133,176
135,409
139,442
144,848

2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets 0.75 %
⁽¹⁾
0.74 %
⁽¹⁾
0.70 %
⁽¹⁾
0.82 %
⁽¹⁾
0.75 %
Return on average equity 6.09
⁽¹⁾
5.95
⁽¹⁾
5.32
⁽¹⁾
5.00
⁽¹⁾
4.14
Dividends paid per share $ 0.88
$ 0.84
$ 0.84
$ 0.98
$ 1.00
Dividend payout ratio 140.20 % 133.86 % 146.19 % 177.84 % 211.75 %
Operating expense ratio 0.80
0.84
0.84
0.96
1.05
Efficiency ratio 41.21
43.76
44.74
43.72
48.13
Ratio of average interest-earning assets
to average interest-bearing liabilities 1.12x
1.13x
1.14x
1.18x
1.21x
Net interest margin 1.79 %
⁽¹⁾
1.75 %
⁽¹⁾
1.73 %
⁽¹⁾
2.00 %
⁽¹⁾
1.97 %

Interest rate spread information:
Average during period 1.66
⁽¹⁾
1.63
⁽¹⁾
1.59
⁽¹⁾
1.79
⁽¹⁾
1.70
End of period 2.04
1.92
1.85
1.84
1.72

Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing assets to total assets 0.20
0.35
0.31
0.29
0.33
Non-performing loans to total loans 0.23
0.42
0.39
0.40
0.44
ACL to non-performing loans 50.58
29.32
36.41
37.04
33.36
ACL to loans receivable, net 0.12
0.12
0.14
0.15
0.15

Capital Ratios:
Equity to total assets at end of period 14.9
15.0
14.4
15.1
17.8
Average equity to average assets 12.4
12.4
13.1
16.4
18.1
Company Tier 1 leverage ratio 12.3
12.3
12.6
N/A
N/A
Bank Tier 1 leverage ratio⁽²⁾
10.8
10.9
11.3
13.2
14.8

Other Data:
Number of traditional offices 37
37
37
37
36
Number of in-store offices 10
10
10
10
10

~~(1)~~

The table below provides a reconciliation between certain performance ratios presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and the performance ratios excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, which are not presented in accordance with GAAP. Management believes it is important for comparability purposes to provide the performance ratios without the leverage strategy because of its unique nature. The leverage strategy reduces some of our performance ratios due to the amount of earnings associated with the transaction in comparison to the size of the transaction, while increasing our net income. Management can discontinue the leverage strategy at any point in time.

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Actual Leverage Adjusted Actual Leverage Adjusted
(GAAP) Strategy (Non-GAAP) (GAAP) Strategy (Non-GAAP)
Return on average assets 0.75 % (0.14 )% 0.89 % 0.74 % (0.14 )% 0.88 %
Return on average equity 6.09
0.21
5.88
5.95
0.17
5.78
Net interest margin 1.79
(0.36 ) 2.15
1.75
(0.35 ) 2.10
Average interest rate spread 1.66
(0.32 ) 1.98
1.63
(0.30 ) 1.93

For the Year Ended September 30,
2015 2014
Actual Leverage Adjusted Actual Leverage Adjusted
(GAAP) Strategy (Non-GAAP) (GAAP) Strategy (Non-GAAP)
Return on average assets 0.70 % (0.13 )% 0.83 % 0.82 % (0.03 )% 0.85 %
Return on average equity 5.32
0.19
5.13
5.00
0.03
4.97
Net interest margin 1.73
(0.34 ) 2.07
2.00
(0.07 ) 2.07
Average interest rate spread 1.59
(0.28 ) 1.87
1.79
(0.05 ) 1.84


~~(2)~~	In periods prior to September 30, 2015, this ratio was calculated using end-of-period total assets in the denominator in accordance with regulatory capital requirements at that point in time. Beginning September 30, 2015, this ratio is calculated using current quarter average assets in the denominator in accordance with current regulatory capital requirements.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources of the Company. The Bank comprises almost all of the consolidated assets and liabilities of the Company and the Company is dependent primarily upon the performance of the Bank for the results of its operations. Because of this relationship, references to management actions, strategies and results of actions apply to both the Bank and the Company.

Executive Summary

The following summary should be read in conjunction with the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section in its entirety.

The Company provides a full range of ~~retail~~ banking services through the Bank, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company headquartered in Topeka, Kansas. The Bank has 3745 traditional and 10nine in-store banking offices serving primarily the metropolitan areas of Topeka, Wichita, Lawrence, Manhattan, Emporia and Salina, Kansas and portions of the Kansas City metropolitan ~~area of greater Kansas City.~~area. We have been, and intend to continue to be, a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities we serve.

The Company's results of operations are primarily dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest earned on loans, securities, and cash, and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. On

Company's Actions and Impact on Operations as a ~~weekly basis, management reviews deposit flows, loan demand, cash levels,~~Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Management's actions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and ~~changes~~the impact of the pandemic on certain aspects of the Company's business during fiscal year 2020 are summarized below.

Bank operations - In mid-March 2020, preventative health measures were put in ~~several market rates~~place including elimination of business-related travel, implementing mandatory work from home for all employees able to ~~assess~~do so, social distancing precautions for all ~~pricing strategies. The Bank's pricing strategy for first mortgage loan products includes setting interest rates based on secondary market prices~~employees in Bank offices, and ~~competitor pricing for our local lending markets,~~preventative cleaning at offices and ~~secondary market prices~~branches. Lobby services were limited to appointment only while drive-through, mobile, and ~~competitor pricing for our correspondent lending markets. Generally, deposit pricing is based upon a survey of competitors in~~online banking became the Bank's ~~market~~primary channels of serving customers. Retail loan closings were conducted with customers coming to our drive-through facilities and commercial loans were closed in person only when necessary. All employees continued to be paid their regular salary and receive full benefits. In mid-May 2020, lobbies reopened with limitations on the number of customers in a branch at one time. We also implemented operational measures to promote social distancing when customers visit branches and installed sneeze guards. There are several other precautions being taken at our locations such as extra cleaning in high traffic/touch areas and providing locations with additional cleaning supplies, hand sanitizer and masks. In early June 2020, back-office employees started to return to the ~~need~~office in phases. Due to ~~attract funding~~the increase in COVID-19 cases in late June into July 2020, management rolled back the changes to the lobbies that occurred mid-May and ~~retain maturing deposits. The majority of our loans are fixed-rate products with maturities up~~adjusted the return to ~~30 years, while~~office phases, where necessary, for back-office employees and lobby services were again by appointment only. In mid-September 2020, lobbies were reopened once again. Management continues to monitor COVID-19 cases and will adjust operational plans as necessary.

Loan modification programs - In late March 2020, the ~~majority of our retail deposits have stated maturities or repricing dates of less than two years.~~

~~The Company is significantly affected by prevailing economic conditions, including federal monetary~~Bank announced loan modification programs to support and ~~fiscal policies and federal regulation of financial institutions. Retail deposit balances are influenced by a number of factors, including interest rates paid on competing investment products,~~provide relief for its borrowers during the ~~level of personal income, and the personal rate of savings within our market areas. Lending activities are influenced by the demand~~COVID-19 pandemic. Generally, loan modifications under these programs ("COVID-19 loan modifications") for ~~housing and other loans, our loan underwriting guidelines compared to those of our competitors, as well as interest rate pricing competition from other lending institutions.~~

Local economic conditions have a significant impact on the ability of borrowers to repay loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans. The industries in the Bank's local market areas, where the properties securing approximately 67% of the Bank's one- to four-family loans and consumer loans consist of a three-month payment forbearance of principal, interest and, in some cases, escrow. COVID-19 loan modifications of commercial loans mainly consist of a six-month interest-only payment period. See "Financial Condition - Loans Receivable" below for additional discussion regarding COVID-19 loan modifications.

As of September 30, 2020, the Bank had 193 one- to four-family loans totaling $39.8 million and 27 consumer loans totaling $795 thousand that were still in their deferral period. The deferral period concluded by September 30, 2020 for $199.7 million of one- to four-family loans and $1.6 million of consumer loans.

As of September 30, 2020, the Bank had 204 commercial loans with a combined gross loan amount of $367.4 million, which includes undisbursed amounts, that were still in their deferral period. The deferral period concluded by September 30, 2020 for $43.5 million, or 11%, of the commercial loans subject to COVID-19 loan modifications. All of these loans were current

as of September 30, 2020. The deferral period for the majority of the remaining commercial loans concluded by November 16, 2020.

Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program loans - As of September 30, 2020, the Bank had originated and funded 791 PPP loans totaling $43.9 million, with a median loan amount of $19 thousand, and received origination fees totaling $1.9 million associated with these loans. These loans are ~~located, are diversified, especially~~fully guaranteed by the SBA. The program ended August 8, 2020. Through November 16, 2020, $12.2 million of the Bank's PPP loans have been forgiven by the SBA.

On October 8, 2020 the SBA released a streamlined loan forgiveness application for PPP loans in amounts of $50 thousand or less. Of the PPP loans originated by the Bank, 611 loans totaling $9.6 million, or 22% of the Bank's aggregate PPP loan balance, were in amounts less than $50 thousand and will be eligible for the streamlined forgiveness process.

Capital, liquidity, and dividends - Management performed stress test scenarios during April 2020. Based on the Company's existing capital levels, deposit inflows, loan underwriting policies, loan concentration, and geographical diversification, no liquidity or capital concerns were identified as a result of the stress tests. Management continues to anticipate being able to manage the economic risks and uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and the Bank remaining well capitalized with sufficient liquidity to serve our customers.

Deposit balances have increased due primarily to the economic stimulus payments, a reduction in consumer spending, and PPP loan proceeds being deposited at the Bank. As a result, management is currently faced with the challenge of excess liquidity. Due to the nature of deposit cash flows, management does not know how long the excess liquidity will continue. As such, management has elected, for the time being, to reduce the Bank's level of borrowings and increase the balance of securities using the excess liquidity from the deposit portfolio.

With earnings of $0.47 per share for fiscal year 2020, and a cash balance at the holding company level of $82.5 million, the Company has the resources to continue to pay its regular quarterly dividend of $0.085 per share for the foreseeable future. Given the state of economic uncertainty and how that may play out with the credit risk exposure in the ~~Kansas City metropolitan statistical area, which comprises the largest segment of our~~Bank's loan portfolio, the Company elected to defer the annual True Blue dividend in June 2020 and ~~deposit base. As of October 2017,~~did not ask at that time for a regulatory non-objection to move capital from the ~~unemployment rate was 3.6% for Kansas and 3.5% for Missouri, compared~~Bank to the ~~national average~~Company to pay that dividend. It is management's intention to ask for a regulatory non-objection at some point in the future to pay this dividend when economic conditions are more certain. It is currently the Company's intention to pay out 100% of ~~4.1% based on information from~~its fiscal year 2021 earnings.

Management's Evolving Response to COVID-19 - There is continued concern about a resurgence of COVID-19 as we enter the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Kansas City market area has an average household income of approximately $80 thousand per annum, based on 2017 estimates from Claritas Pop-Facts Premier. The average household income in our combined local market areas is approximately $76 thousand per annum, with 91% of the population at or above the poverty level, also based on the 2017 estimates from Claritas Pop-Facts Premier. The FHFA price index for Kansaswinter months. In October and ~~Missouri continues to indicate relative stability in property values~~November 2020, COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths nationally and in our local market areas increased compared to the summer months, including to new record levels in some areas. ~~Management~~The Kansas Governor recently issued an executive order establishing a statewide face-covering protocol as part of her administration's strategy to keep schools and businesses open and to protect the economy. We continue to be confronted with a significant and unfamiliar degree of uncertainty as to how a resurgence will impact our customers, employees, and operations and how actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to a resurgence will impact our customers, employees, and operations. We will continue to monitor COVID-19 cases and will adjust operational plans as necessary. We will also ~~monitors broad industry~~continue to assist our customers as necessary during these uncertain times. See "Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Macroeconomic Conditions" for additional discussion regarding the impact the COVID-19 pandemic may have on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Impact on Market Interest Rates as a Result of COVID-19 Pandemic and Company's Response

The Federal Reserve, in response to economic ~~indicators~~risks resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, returned to a zero-interest rate policy in March 2020. This was after most broader market rates decreased significantly in response to evolving news about the COVID-19 pandemic. The dramatic lowering of interest rates in a short period of time impacted the operations and ~~trends~~performance of the Bank. Deteriorating economic conditions included more than 20 million people becoming unemployed in the ~~states and/~~United States in one month's time, with more than 58 million in total filing for unemployment benefits, along with immediate reductions in consumer spending on almost all categories of purchases except groceries and staples, and closure or ~~metropolitan statistical~~significantly reduced operations of restaurants, bars, airlines, hotels, and entertainment and hospitality venues, among others, and had a devastating impact on the economy. Since that time, many areas of consumer spending have rebounded, generally locally and not related to travel and entertainment. As previously described, we adjusted our operations in response to the

COVID-19 pandemic and have worked with both our retail and commercial customers to help them manage their debt during this period of economic uncertainty as our regulators or the CARES Act have allowed. There is increasing concern about the longer lasting impact on local business as well as travel and entertainment resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. This could cause a longer recovery time for all sectors of the economy and could make it challenging for sectors that have had better recoveries to maintain that recovery in the long run.

We have been responding and expect to continue to respond to local market conditions regarding the loan and deposit rates we offer. We responded to lower market rates for lending by lowering rates offered on our one- to four-family loan products over the course of the year. Given current market interest rates, rates offered on new loans and the recent volume of one- to four-family refinances and endorsements allowing borrowers to take advantage of the lower current market interest rates, the yield on the total loan portfolio is likely to continue to decrease. Additionally, with significant cash inflows realized due to investment securities being called and prepayments on MBS increasing, the yields on reinvested funds into new securities are lower than portfolio yields. Since the onset of the pandemic the Bank lowered its offered rates on all retail deposit products except checking and savings accounts. Changes in the rates paid on money market accounts have an immediate impact on the cost of our deposits, while the impact of reducing rates offered on our certificate of deposit products lower the cost of deposits only as certificates of deposit reprice lower when they mature. As the Bank further monitors rates offered and the cost of borrowings, we anticipate that the average cost of our interest-bearing liabilities will continue to decrease.

Considering the drastic changes in market rates and the ongoing economic uncertainty, even with the ~~highest concentrations~~changes the Bank has made to its cost of funding, with the lower rates on new mortgage loans, refinances, endorsements and new securities also at lower rates, our net interest margin could continue to decrease, with further downside risk as a result of high levels of prepayments and premium amortization on correspondent ~~purchased loans.~~one- to four-family loans and MBS.

~~For fiscal year 2017, the~~Summary of Results of Operation and Financial Condition

The Company recognized net income of ~~$84.1~~$64.5 million, or ~~$0.63~~$0.47 per share, for the year ended September 30, 2020 compared to net income of ~~$83.5~~$94.2 million, or ~~$0.63~~$0.68 per share, for ~~fiscal~~the year ~~2016.~~ended September 30, 2019. The ~~increase~~decrease in net income was due primarily to a ~~$3.2~~$21.6 million increase in provision for credit losses and a decrease in net interest income, partially offset by a ~~$1.1 million~~ decrease in ~~non-interest income. Additionally, no provision~~income tax expense.

Net interest income decreased $17.1 million, or 8.3%, from the prior year to $189.3 million for ~~credit losses was recorded in fiscal year 2017, compared to a negative provision for credit losses of $750 thousand in fiscal year 2016.~~

~~During fiscal year 2017,~~ the ~~Bank continued to utilize a leverage strategy to increase earnings.~~current year. The leverage strategy was suspended at certain times during the ~~current fiscal~~prior year involved borrowing up to $2.10 billion either on the Bank's FHLB line of credit or by entering into short-term FHLB advances, depending on the rates offered by FHLB. The borrowings were repaid prior to each quarter end for regulatory purposes. The proceeds from the borrowings, netand during all of the ~~required FHLB stock holdings, which yielded approximately 6.4% during the~~ current ~~fiscal~~ year ~~were deposited at the FRB of Kansas City. Net income attributable~~due to the ~~leverage strategy is largely derived from the dividends received on FHLB stock holdings, net of the~~negative interest rate ~~spread~~spreads between ~~the yield on the cash at the FRB of Kansas City and the rate paid on~~ the related FHLB borrowings ~~less applicable federal insurance premiums~~ and estimated taxes. Net income attributable to the leverage strategy was $2.8 million during the current fiscal year, compared to $2.3 million for the prior fiscal year. The increase was due primarily to a more positive interest rate spread between the yield earned on the cash held at the FRB of Kansas City, making the transaction unprofitable. Excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, net interest income decreased $16.9 million, or 8.2% compared to the prior year. The decrease in net interest income excluding the effects of the leverage strategy was due to a $20.9 million decrease in interest and dividend income, partially offset by a $4.0 million decrease in interest expense. Interest and dividend income decreased across all interest-earning asset types, with the most significant being a $13.7 million decrease in interest income on loans receivable, primarily related to correspondent loans. Interest income on correspondent loans decreased due primarily to a reduction in the portfolio balance and rate related to payoffs exceeding purchases, new loans purchased at lower market interest rates, and downward repricing of existing loans, along with an increase in premium amortization due to payoffs and endorsements. Interest expense on borrowings, excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, decreased $5.4 million due to replacing FHLB advances at lower market rates and a reduction in the rate ~~paid~~and usage of the Bank's FHLB line of credit. This was partially offset by a $1.4 million increase in interest expense on ~~the related FHLB borrowings than in the prior fiscal year, as well as~~deposits due to ~~a decrease in federal insurance premiums attributed to the strategy and~~ an increase in the ~~yield on~~cost of the ~~FHLB stock attributed to the strategy. Management expects to continue this strategy in fiscal year 2018.~~retail/business certificate of deposit portfolio.

The net interest margin ~~increased four~~decreased 14 basis points, from ~~1.75%~~2.26% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year to ~~1.79%~~2.12% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year. When the leverage strategy is in place, it increases our net interest income but reduces the net interest margin due to the amount of earnings from the transaction in comparison to the size of the transaction. Excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, the net interest margin would have ~~increased five~~decreased 18 basis points, from ~~2.10%~~2.30% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year to ~~2.15%~~2.12% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year. The ~~increase~~decrease in the net interest margin, excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, was due mainly to a ~~shift~~decrease in the ~~mix~~loan portfolio yield, specifically the yield on the correspondent one- to four-family loan portfolio.

Total assets at September 30, 2020 were $9.49 billion, an increase of ~~interest-earning assets~~$147.2 million, or 1.6% from ~~relatively lower yielding~~September 30, 2019. The increase was due mainly to an increase in securities, ~~to higher yielding loans,~~ partially offset by a decrease in loans receivable. Securities were purchased with cash flows from payments on the ~~weighted average yield on loans. The positive impact of~~loan portfolio and growth in the ~~decrease in interest expense on borrowings not related to the leverage strategy was offset by an increase in interest expense on deposits.~~

deposit portfolio. Total ~~assets were $9.19 billion at~~loans decreased $213.9 million from September 30, ~~2017 compared~~2019 to ~~$9.27 billion at~~ September 30, ~~2016.~~2020. The ~~$74.3 million~~ decrease was ~~due~~ primarily ~~to a $384.6 million decrease~~ in the ~~securities portfolio,~~one- to four-family correspondent loans and one- to four-family bulk purchased loans, partially offset by an increase in ~~the loan portfolio.~~

~~The~~one- to four-family originated loans ~~receivable portfolio, net, increased $237.0 million to $7.20 billion at September 30, 2017, from $6.96 billion at September 30, 2016.~~and commercial loans. During the current ~~fiscal~~ year, the Bank originated and refinanced ~~$698.5 million~~$1.00 billion of one- to four-family and consumer loans with a weighted average rate of ~~3.68%~~3.27% and purchased ~~$563.2~~$448.0 million of one- to four-family loans from correspondent lenders with a weighted average rate of ~~3.60%~~3.29%. The Bank also ~~entered into participations of $67.7~~originated $165.5 million of commercial ~~real estate~~ loans with a weighted average rate of ~~3.98%,~~3.52% and entered into commercial real estate loan participations of ~~which $43.2~~$93.6 million ~~had not yet been funded as~~at a weighted average rate of 4.16%. The commercial loan portfolio totaled $829.7 million at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020 and was composed of 75% commercial real estate, 12% commercial and industrial, and 13% commercial construction. Total commercial real estate and commercial construction potential exposure, including undisbursed amounts and outstanding commitments totaling $205.5 million, was $937.5 million at September 30, 2020. Total commercial and industrial potential exposure, including undisbursed amounts and outstanding commitments of $21.7 million, was $119.3 million at September 30, 2020.

~~Loan activity~~Total deposits at September 30, 2020 were $6.19 billion, an increase of $609.5 million, or 10.9%, from September 30, 2019. Non-maturity deposits increased $575.9 million, including a $242.8 million increase in checking accounts, a $220.8 million increase in money market accounts, and a $112.3 million increase in savings accounts. Retail/business certificates of deposit increased $73.7 million during the current year, mainly in the ~~current fiscal year decreased compared to the prior fiscal year~~business-related certificates of deposit category. These increases were partially offset by a $40.1 million decrease in public unit certificates of deposit.

Total borrowings at September 30, 2020 were $1.79 billion, a decrease of $450.7 million, or 20.1%, from September 30, 2019. The decrease was due to ~~the Bank managing the size~~not renewing a portion of the ~~loan portfolio as it manages its liquidity levels. Loan volume has primarily been maintained through~~FHLB advances and repurchase agreements that matured during the ~~rates offered to correspondent lenders. Generally, over~~current year and repaying the ~~past couple years, cash~~FHLB line of credit balance. Cash flows from the ~~securities~~deposit portfolio ~~have been~~were used ~~primarily to purchase loans and in part~~ to pay ~~down~~off maturing borrowings and the FHLB advances. By moving cash from lower yielding assets to higher yielding assets and repaying higher cost liabilities, we have been able to maintain our net interest margin. In addition to the repaymentline of ~~securities, the Bank has emphasized growth in the deposit portfolio in part to pay down FHLB advances. The ratio of securities and cash to total assets~~credit.

Stockholders' equity was 17.4% at September 30, 2017, and we will be managing this ratio to approximately 15%. In the long run, management considers a ten percent ratio of stockholders' equity to total assets at the Bank as an appropriate level of capital. At September 30, 2017, this ratio was 13.1%.

~~Total liabilities were $7.82~~$1.28 billion at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$7.87~~$1.34 billion at September 30, 2016. FHLB borrowings decreased $198.6 million, to $2.17 billion at September 30, 2017, as certain maturing FHLB advances were not replaced. Deposits increased $145.9 million, to $5.31 billion at September 30, 2017, due mainly to increases in wholesale certificates and non-maturity retail deposits.

~~Stockholders' equity was $1.37 billion at September 30, 2017 compared to $1.39 billion at September 30, 2016.~~2019. The ~~$24.7~~$51.5 million decrease was due primarily to the payment of ~~$118.0~~cash dividends totaling $93.9 million ~~in cash dividends,~~and the repurchase of common stock totaling $23.8 million, partially offset by net income of ~~$84.1 million.~~$64.5 million during the current year. During the current fiscal year, the Company repurchased 2,558,100 shares of common stock. In the long run, management considers the Bank's equity to total assets ratio of at least 10% an appropriate level of capital. At September 30, 2020, this ratio was 12.3%. The cash dividends paid during the current ~~fiscal~~ year totaled ~~$0.88~~$0.68 per share and consisted of a ~~$0.29~~$0.34 per share cash true-up dividend related to fiscal year ~~2016~~2019 earnings, paid in December 2019, per the Company's dividend policy, ~~a $0.25 per share True Blue Capitol dividend,~~ and four regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.085 per share, totaling $0.34 per share.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our most critical accounting policies are the methodologies used to determine the ACL and fair value measurements. These policies are important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations, involve a high degree of complexity, and require management to make difficult and subjective judgments that may require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters. The use of different judgments, assumptions, and estimates could ~~cause~~affect reported results ~~to differ~~ materially. These critical accounting policies and their application are reviewed at least annually by our audit committee. The following is a description of our critical accounting policies and an explanation of the methods and assumptions underlying their application.

Allowance for Credit Losses. The Company maintains an ACL to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio based upon ongoing quarterly assessments of the loan portfolio. The ACL is maintained through provisions for credit losses which are either charged or credited to income. The methodology for determining the ACL is considered a critical accounting policy by management because of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in economic conditions that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded ACL. Additionally, bank regulators review the ACL and could have a differing view from management regarding the ACL balance, which could result in an increase in the ACL and/or the recognition of additional charge-offs. Although management believes that the Bank has established and maintained the ACL at appropriate levels, additions may be necessary if economic and other conditions worsen substantially from the current operating environment, and/or if bank regulators have a differing view from management regarding the ACL balance.

Our ~~primary~~ lending emphasis ison the origination and purchase of one- to four-family loans and, to a lesser extent, consumer loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties, ~~resulting~~has resulted in a loan concentration in one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. We believe the primary risks inherent in our one- to four-family and consumer loan portfolios are a decline in economic conditions, elevated levels of unemployment or underemployment, and declines in residential real estate values. ~~Changes~~Adverse changes in any one or a combination of these events may ~~adversely~~negatively affect borrowers' ability to repay their loans, resulting in increased delinquencies, non-performing assets, loan losses, and future loan loss provisions. Although the commercial ~~real estate~~ loan portfolio is subject to the same risk of declines in economic conditions, the primary risk characteristics inherent in this portfolio include the ability of the borrower to sustain sufficient cash flows from leases and business operations, the ability to control operational or business expenses to satisfy their contractual debt payments, ~~and/or~~and the ability to utilize personal ~~and/~~or business resources to pay their contractual debt payments if the cash flows are not sufficient. Additionally, if the Bank were to repossess the secured collateral of a commercial real estate loan, the pool of potential buyers is more limited ~~more~~ than that for a residential property. Therefore, the Bank could hold the property for an extended period of time, ~~and/~~or potentially be forced to sell at a discounted price, resulting in additional losses. Our commercial and industrial loans are primarily secured by accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, which may be difficult to appraise, may be illiquid and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.

Each quarter, we prepare a formula analysis model which segregates our loan portfolio into categories based on certain risk characteristics such as loan type (one- to four-family, commercial, ~~real estate,~~ etc.), interest payments (fixed-rate and adjustable-rate), loan source (originated, correspondent purchased, or bulk purchased), LTV ratios, borrower's credit score and payment status (i.e. current or number of days delinquent). Consumer loans, such as second mortgages and home equity lines of credit, with the same underlying collateral as a one- to four-family loan are combined with the one- to four-family loan in the formula analysis model to calculate a combined LTV ratio.

Historical loss factors are applied to each loan category in the formula analysis model. Additionally, qualitative ~~loss~~ factors that management believes impact the collectability of the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date are applied to each loan category. Qualitative loss factors increase as loans are classified or become delinquent. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information related to the historical and qualitative loss factors utilized in the formula analysis model.

The historical loss and qualitative factors applied in the formula analysis model are reviewed quarterly by management to assess whether the factors adequately cover probable and estimable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our ACL methodology permits modifications to the formula analysis model in the event that, in management's judgment, significant factors which affect the collectability of the portfolio or any category of the loan portfolio, as of the evaluation date, have changed from the current formula analysis model. Management's evaluation of the qualitative factors with respect to these conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty because they are not identified with a specific problem loan or portfolio segment.

~~Management utilizes~~During the current fiscal year, management increased the historical loss and qualitative factors applied in the formula analysis model ~~along with analyzing~~for all loan categories and ~~considering several other relevant internal~~added a COVID-19 qualitative loss factor to the Bank's commercial loan portfolio. The increase in the factors and ~~external data elements, when evaluating~~ the ~~adequacy~~addition of the ~~ACL.~~new qualitative factor was in response to the deterioration of economic conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Management considered several items when determining the appropriate historical loss and qualitative factors to apply in the formula analysis model. Such ~~data elements include~~considerations included: national and state unemployment and unemployment benefit claim information, amount and timing of governmental financial assistance, the ~~trend~~Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program, consumer spending information, industries most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and ~~composition of delinquent~~a loan analysis completed by the commercial lending team. Management also evaluated the Bank's historical and ~~non-performing loans, trends in foreclosed property and short sale transactions~~peer ACL to loan ratios and charge-off ~~activity,~~ratios taking into consideration the ~~current status~~economic conditions during those time periods. After applying the higher and ~~trends of local and national employment levels, trends and current conditions~~new factors in the ~~housing markets, loan growth and concentrations, industry and peer charge-off and ACL information, and certain ACL ratios such as~~formula analysis model, management then considered the calculated ACL to loans ~~receivable, net~~ratio compared to historical and ~~annualized historical losses. Since our loan portfolio is primarily concentrated~~peer ratios to determine the appropriate amount of ACL at September 30, 2020, considering the economic conditions at that point in ~~one-~~time.

Non-PCI loans that have not become impaired subsequent to ~~four-family real estate, management monitors residential real estate market value trends~~the acquisition date are included in the formula analysis model. For these loans, the Company estimates a hypothetical amount of ACL. The Company applies the same historical and qualitative loss factors as the Bank's ~~local market areas~~formula analysis model to establish the hypothetical amount of ACL. This amount is compared with the remaining net purchase discount for the non-PCI loans to test for credit quality deterioration and ~~geographic sections~~the

possible need for an additional loan loss provision. To the extent the remaining net purchase discount of the ~~U.S. by reference to various industry and market reports, economic releases and surveys, and management's general and specific knowledge~~pool is greater than the hypothetical ACL, no additional ACL is necessary. If the remaining net purchase discount of the ~~real estate markets~~pool is less than the hypothetical ACL, the difference results in ~~which we lend,~~an increase to the ACL recorded through a provision for credit losses.

Management will continue to closely monitor economic conditions and will work with borrowers as necessary to assist them through this challenging economic climate. If economic conditions worsen or do not improve in ~~order to determine what impact,~~the near term, and if future government programs, if any, ~~such trends may have on~~do not provide adequate relief to borrowers, it is possible the ~~level of ACL. Reviewing these data elements assists management in evaluating the overall credit quality of the loan portfolio and the reasonableness of the~~Bank's ACL ~~on an ongoing basis, and whether changes~~will need to ~~be made to our ACL methodology.~~increase in future periods. In addition, the adequacy of the Company's ACL is reviewed during bank regulatory examinations. We consider any comments from our regulators when assessing the appropriateness of our ACL. ~~We seek~~Management seeks to apply the ACL methodology in a consistent manner; however, the methodology ~~can~~may be modified in response to changing conditions.

ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments became effective for the Company on October 1, 2020. See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information.

Fair Value Measurements. The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial instruments and to determine fair value disclosures in accordance with Accounting ~~Standard~~Standards Codification ("ASC") 820 and ASC 825. The Company groups its financial instruments at fair value in three levels based on the markets in which the instruments are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value, with Level 1 (quoted prices for identical assets in an active market) being considered the most reliable, and Level 3 having the most unobservable inputs and therefore being considered the least reliable. The Company bases its fair values on the price that would be received from the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The Company's AFS securities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Changes in the fair value of AFS securities are recorded, net of tax, as AOCI in stockholders' equity. The Company primarily uses prices obtained from ~~third party~~third-party pricing services to determine the fair value of its AFS securities. Various modeling techniques are used to determine pricing for the Company's securities, including option pricing, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. The inputs to these models may include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. There is one security, with a balance of $2.1 million at September 30, 2017, in the AFS portfolio that has significant unobservable inputs requiring the independent pricing services to use some judgment in pricing the related securities. This AFS security is classified as Level 3. All ~~other~~ AFS securities are classified as Level 2.

The Company's interest rate swaps are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The ~~Company uses~~estimated fair value of the interest rate swaps are obtained from the counterparty and are determined by a discounted cash flow analysis using observable market-based ~~inputs to determine the fair value of is interest rate swaps.~~inputs. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recorded, net of tax, as AOCI in stockholders' equity. The Company did not have any other ~~liabilities~~financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

Loans individually evaluated for impairment and OREO are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These non-recurring fair value adjustments involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets. Fair values of loans individually evaluated for impairment are estimated through current appraisals. OREO fair values are estimated using current appraisals or listing prices. Fair values may be adjusted by management to reflect current economic and market conditions and, as such, are classified as Level 3.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of Recent Accounting Pronouncements, see "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Financial Statements – Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."

Management Strategy

We are a community-oriented financial institution dedicated to serving the needs of customers in our market areas. Our commitment is to provide qualified borrowers the broadest possible access to home ownership through our mortgage lending programs and to offer a complete set of personal and commercial banking products and services to our customers. We strive to enhance stockholder value while maintaining a strong capital position. To achieve these goals, we focus on the following strategies:

~~Residential Portfolio~~ •Lending. We are one of the leading originators of one- to four-family loans in the state of Kansas. We originate these loans primarily for our own portfolio, and we service the loans we originate. We also purchase one- to four-family loans from correspondent lenders. In addition, we offer several commercial lending options to our customers and participate in commercial loans with other lenders. We offer both fixed- and adjustable-rate products with various terms to maturity and pricing options. We maintain strong relationships with local real estate agents to attract mortgage loan business. We rely on our marketing efforts and customer service reputation to attract mortgage business from walk-in customers, customers that apply online, and existing customers.

~~Retail Financial~~•Deposit Services. We offer a wide array of retail and business deposit products and ~~retail~~ services. These products include checking, savings, money market, certificates of deposit, and retirement accounts. ~~They~~Our deposit services are provided through a branch network of 4754 locations, including traditional branches and retail in-store locations, our call center which operates on extended hours, mobile banking, telephone banking, and online banking and bill payment services.

•Cost Control. We generally are very effective at controlling our costs of operations. By using technology, we are able to centralize our loan servicing and deposit support functions for efficient processing. We ~~have located our branches to~~ serve a broad range of customers through relatively few branch locations. Our average deposit base per traditional branch at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 was approximately ~~$123.1~~$123.6 million. This large average deposit base per branch helps to control costs. Our one- to four-family lending strategy and our effective management of credit risk allows us to service a large portfolio of loans at efficient levels because it costs less to service a portfolio of performing loans.

We recognize it is more expensive to offer a full suite of commercial products and services, but we will continue our efforts to control those costs.

•Asset Quality. We utilize underwriting standards for our lending products, including the loans we purchase and participate in, that are designed to limit our exposure to credit risk. We require complete documentation for both originated and purchased loans, and make credit decisions based on our assessment of the borrower's ability to repay the loan in accordance with its terms.

Additionally, we monitor the asset quality of existing loans and strive to work proactively with customers who face challenging financial conditions.

•Capital Position. Our policy has always been to protect the safety and soundness of the Bank through credit and operational risk management, balance sheet strength, and sound operations. The end result of these activities has been a capital ratio in excess of the well-capitalized standards set by the OCC. We believe that maintaining a strong capital position safeguards the long-term interests of the Bank, the Company, and our stockholders.

•Stockholder Value. We strive to ~~enhance~~provide stockholder value while maintaining a strong capital position. One way that we continue to provide returns to stockholders is through our dividend payments. Total dividends declared and paid during fiscal year ~~2017~~2020 were ~~$118.0 million, including a $0.25 per share, or $33.6 million, True Blue® Capitol Dividend paid in June 2017.~~$93.9 million. The Company's cash dividend payout policy is reviewed quarterly by management and the Board of Directors, and the ability to pay dividends under the policy depends upon a number of factors, including the Company's financial condition and results of operations, regulatory capital requirements, regulatory limitations on the Bank's ability to make capital distributions to the Company, and the amount of cash at the holding company level. For fiscal year ~~2018,~~2021, it is the ~~intent~~intention of the Board of Directors ~~and management~~ to continue ~~with~~ the payout of 100% of the Company's earnings to its stockholders through regular quarterly dividends and a true-up dividend.

Stockholder value is also provided through common stock repurchases. During fiscal year 2020, the Company repurchased $23.8 million, or 2,558,100 shares, of common stock.

•Interest Rate Risk Management. Changes in interest rates are our primary market risk as our balance sheet is almost entirely comprised of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. As such, fluctuations in interest rates have a significant impact not only upon our net income but also upon the cash flows related to those assets and liabilities and the market value of our assets and liabilities. In order to maintain what we believe to be acceptable levels of net interest income in varying interest rate environments, we actively manage our interest rate risk and assume a moderate amount of interest rate risk consistent with board policies.

~~FinancialCondition~~

FinancialCondition

Assets. Total assets ~~were $9.19 billion~~ at September 30, ~~2017 compared to $9.27~~2020 were $9.49 billion, atan increase of $147.2 million, or 1.6% from September 30, ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~$74.3 million decrease~~increase was due ~~primarily~~mainly to ~~a $384.6 million decrease~~an increase in ~~the~~ securities, ~~portfolio,~~ partially offset by ~~an increase~~a decrease in loans receivable. Securities were purchased with cash flows from the loan portfolio and growth in the ~~loan~~deposit portfolio.

Loans Receivable. Loans receivable, net, increased $237.0 million to $7.20 billion at September 30, 2017 from $6.96 billion at September 30, 2016. The one- to four-family loan portfolio increased $119.1 million and the commercial real estate loan portfolio increased $115.8 million. The following table presents the balance and weighted average rate of our loan portfolio as of the dates indicated. ~~Within~~Approximately 67% of the one- to four-family loan portfolio balance at September 30, ~~2017, 58%~~2020 was comprised of ~~this amount~~loans that had a balance of $510 thousand or less at ~~origination~~the time of ~~less than $424 thousand.~~origination. The weighted average interest rate on our loan portfolio decreased 26 basis points, to 3.55% at September 30, 2020. The decrease was due primarily to the downward repricing of the one- to four-family originated and correspondent purchased portfolios as a result of endorsements, payoffs of loans with higher rates, and originations and purchases at lower market rates during the year.


	September 30, 2020				September 30, 2019
	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	3,937,310	3.50	%	$	3,873,851	3.74	%
Correspondent purchased	2,101,082		3.49		2,349,877		3.64
Bulk purchased	208,427		2.41		252,347		2.94
Construction	34,593		3.30		36,758		4.00
Total	6,281,412		3.46		6,512,833		3.68
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	626,588		4.29		583,617		4.48
Commercial and industrial	97,614		2.79		61,094		5.14
Construction	105,458		4.04		123,159		4.81
Total	829,660		4.08		767,870		4.58
Consumer loans:
Home equity	103,838		4.66		120,587		6.15
Other	10,086		4.40		11,183		4.57
Total	113,924		4.64		131,770		6.02
Total loans receivable	7,224,996		3.55		7,412,473		3.81

Less:
ACL	31,527				9,226
Discounts/unearned loan fees	29,190				31,058
Premiums/deferred costs	(38,572)				(44,558)
Total loans receivable, net	$	7,202,851			$	7,416,747

September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
Amount Rate Amount Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family:
Originated $ 3,959,232
3.70 % $ 4,005,615
3.74 %
Correspondent purchased 2,445,311
3.53
2,206,072
3.50
Bulk purchased 351,705
2.29
416,653
2.23
Construction 30,647
3.45
39,430
3.45
Total 6,786,895
3.56
6,667,770
3.56
Commercial:
Permanent 183,030
4.24
110,768
4.16
Construction 86,952
3.80
43,375
4.13
Total 269,982
4.10
154,143
4.15
Total real estate loans 7,056,877
3.58
6,821,913
3.58

Consumer loans:
Home equity 122,066
5.40
123,345
5.01
Other 3,808
4.05
4,264
4.21
Total consumer loans 125,874
5.36
127,609
4.99
Total loans receivable 7,182,751
3.61
6,949,522
3.60

Less:
ACL 8,398
8,540

Discounts/unearned loan fees 24,962
24,933

Premiums/deferred costs (45,680 ) (41,975 )
Total loans receivable, net $ 7,195,071
$ 6,958,024

Loan Activity - The following tables summarize activity in the loan portfolio, along with weighted average rates where applicable, for the periods indicated, excluding changes in ACL, discounts/unearned loan fees, and premiums/deferred costs. Loans that were ~~paid-off~~paid off as a result of refinances are included in repayments. Loan endorsements are not included in the activity in the following ~~tables~~table because a new loan is not generated at the time of the endorsement. The endorsed balance and rate are included in the ending loan portfolio balance and rate. During ~~the~~ fiscal ~~years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,~~year 2020, the Bank endorsed ~~$53.1 million and $160.0~~$695.4 million of one- to four-family loans, ~~respectively,~~ reducing the average rate on those loans by 7183 basis points. Commercial loan renewals are not included in the activity in the following table unless new funds are disbursed at the time of renewal. During the initial days of the COVID-19 pandemic, correspondent one- to four-family loan application acceptance was suspended by the Bank but existing correspondent applications and ~~91 basis points, respectively.~~commitments continued to progress through the approval and funding process. One- to four-family correspondent new loan application acceptance resumed in mid-June 2020.


	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2020				June 30, 2020				March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	7,407,442	3.64	%	$	7,493,280	3.74	%	$	7,424,834	3.77	%	$	7,412,473	3.81	%
Originated and refinanced:
Fixed	265,424		2.98		277,904		2.83		172,891		3.44		233,693		3.52
Adjustable	44,625		3.68		60,626		3.75		55,946		4.11		55,126		4.30
Purchased and participations:
Fixed	61,435		3.07		131,739		3.28		125,612		3.46		123,118		3.77
Adjustable	4,396		2.76		62,510		3.76		18,985		2.96		13,801		3.06

Change in undisbursed loan funds	13,898				(32,202)				24,049				(9,743)
Repayments	(572,536)				(586,434)				(328,644)				(403,361)
Principal recoveries/(charge-offs), net	312				19				(314)				(16)
Other	—				—				(79)				(257)
Ending balance	$	7,224,996	3.55		$	7,407,442	3.64		$	7,493,280	3.74		$	7,424,834	3.77


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020				2019
	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	7,412,473	3.81	%	$	7,507,645	3.74	%
Originated and refinanced:
Fixed	949,912		3.15		505,334		4.10
Adjustable	216,323		3.97		319,608		4.77
Purchased and participations:
Fixed	441,904		3.44		186,135		4.64
Adjustable	99,692		3.47		76,305		4.40

Change in undisbursed loan funds	(3,998)				52,220
Repayments	(1,890,975)				(1,233,157)
Principal recoveries, net	1				13
Other	(336)				(1,630)
Ending balance	$	7,224,996	3.55		$	7,412,473	3.81

For the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance $ 7,228,425
3.60 % $ 7,182,346
3.59 % $ 7,061,557
3.58 % $ 6,949,522
3.60 %
Originated and refinanced:
Fixed 102,687
3.82
116,422
3.94
115,560
3.66
176,554
3.26
Adjustable 44,900
4.10
59,372
3.87
36,417
3.82
46,566
3.54
Purchased and participations:
Fixed 76,906
3.92
135,041
3.97
143,852
3.69
187,674
3.52
Adjustable 17,046
3.33
17,930
3.24
27,158
2.98
25,262
2.73
Change in undisbursed loan funds 21,823
13,648
37,862
3,696

Repayments (307,909 ) (295,988 ) (239,072 ) (326,839 )
Principal recoveries (charge-offs), net (88 ) 39
(74 ) (19 )
Other (1,039 ) (385 ) (914 ) (859 )
Ending balance $ 7,182,751
3.61
$ 7,228,425
3.60
$ 7,182,346
3.59
$ 7,061,557
3.58

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Amount Rate Amount Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance $ 6,949,522
3.60 % $ 6,622,728
3.66 %
Originations and refinances:
Fixed 511,223
3.62
606,365
3.52
Adjustable 187,255
3.83
166,539
3.65
Purchases and participations:
Fixed 543,473
3.73
720,253
3.64
Adjustable 87,396
3.03
143,679
3.36
Change in undisbursed loan funds 77,029
(142,027 )
Repayments (1,169,808 ) (1,164,000 )
Principal charge-offs, net (142 ) (153 )
Other (3,197 ) (3,862 )
Ending balance $ 7,182,751
3.61
$ 6,949,522
3.60

The following ~~tables present~~table presents loan origination, refinance, and purchase activity for the periods indicated, excluding endorsement activity, along with associated weighted average rates and percent of total. Commercial loan renewals are not included in the activity in the following table except to the extent new funds are disbursed at the time of renewal. Loan originations, purchases, and refinances are reported together. During fiscal year 2019, the Bank discontinued the use of LIBOR for adjustable-rate one- to four-family loan originations and no longer purchases correspondent one- to four-family loans that use LIBOR, since LIBOR is expected to be discontinued by the end of calendar year 2021. Adjustable-rate one- to four-family loan originations and purchases are now tied to the one-year CMT index, which, to date, does not appear to have had any impact on our ability and opportunities to originate and purchase adjustable-rate one- to four-family loans.


	For the Year Ended
	September 30, 2020						September 30, 2019
	Amount		Rate		% of Total		Amount		Rate		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed-rate:
One- to four-family:(1)
<= 15 years	$	384,937	2.79	%	22.5	%	$	106,966	3.56	%	9.8	%
> 15 years	804,898		3.41		47.1		420,243		4.14		38.6
One- to four-family construction	44,754		3.28		2.6		51,663		4.13		4.8
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	44,005		4.17		2.7		27,886		6.21		2.6
Commercial and industrial	65,174		1.92		3.8		15,291		5.24		1.4
Commercial construction	39,346		4.71		2.3		59,108		4.85		5.4
Home equity	4,493		5.83		0.3		5,411		6.20		0.5
Other	4,209		5.67		0.2		4,901		5.29		0.5
Total fixed-rate	1,391,816		3.24		81.5		691,469		4.24		63.6

Adjustable-rate:
One- to four-family:(2)
<= 36 months	5,800		2.80		0.3		9,786		3.57		0.9
> 36 months	125,865		2.95		7.4		139,511		3.70		12.8
One- to four-family construction	12,984		2.97		0.8		19,364		3.86		1.8
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	50,697		4.56		3.0		100,142		4.84		9.2
Commercial and industrial	6,360		4.72		0.4		27,496		5.63		2.5
Commercial construction	53,563		4.06		3.1		30,251		5.39		2.8
Home equity	58,709		4.95		3.4		66,893		6.33		6.2
Other	2,037		3.86		0.1		2,470		3.51		0.2
Total adjustable-rate	316,015		3.81		18.5		395,913		4.70		36.4

Total originated, refinanced and purchased	$	1,707,831	3.35		100.0	%	$	1,087,382	4.41		100.0	%

Purchased and participation loans included above:
Fixed-rate:
Correspondent - one- to four-family	$	395,778	3.34				$	118,758	4.31

Participations - commercial	46,126		4.29				67,377		5.24

Total fixed-rate purchased/participations	441,904		3.44				186,135		4.64

Adjustable-rate:
Correspondent - one- to four-family	52,192		2.94				47,655		3.83

Participations - commercial	47,500		4.04				28,650		5.35

Total adjustable-rate purchased/participations	99,692		3.47				76,305		4.40
Total purchased/participation loans	$	541,596	3.44				$	262,440	4.57

(1)The fixed-rate one- to four-family loans less than or equal to 15 years have an original maturity at origination of less than or equal to 15 years, while fixed-rate one- to four-family loans greater than 15 years have an original maturity at origination of greater than 15 years.

(2)The adjustable-rate one- to four-family loans less than or equal to 36 months have a term to first reset of less than or equal to 36 months at origination and adjustable-rate one- to four-family loans greater than 36 months have a term to first reset of greater than 36 months at origination.

For the Year Ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
Amount Rate % of Total Amount Rate % of Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed-rate:
One- to four-family:
<= 15 years $ 212,477
3.04 % 16.0 % $ 265,721
2.97 % 16.2 %
> 15 years 772,549
3.81
58.1
871,669
3.67
53.3
Commercial real estate 65,696
4.03
4.9
184,153
4.01
11.2
Home equity 3,510
5.87
0.3
4,247
5.71
0.3
Other 464
9.87
—
828
8.73
0.1
Total fixed-rate 1,054,696
3.68
79.3
1,326,618
3.59
81.1

Adjustable-rate:
One- to four-family:
<= 36 months 7,554
2.88
0.6
4,980
2.58
0.3
> 36 months 189,576
3.06
14.3
183,697
2.90
11.2
Commercial real estate 2,992
3.25
0.2
47,876
4.29
2.9
Home equity 72,245
5.03
5.4
71,013
4.65
4.3
Other 2,284
3.40
0.2
2,652
3.36
0.2
Total adjustable-rate 274,651
3.58
20.7
310,218
3.52
18.9

Total originated, refinanced and purchased $ 1,329,347
3.66
100.0 % $ 1,636,836
3.57
100.0 %

Purchased and participation loans included above:
Fixed-rate:
Correspondent - one- to four-family $ 478,772
3.70
$ 567,014
3.56

Participations - commercial real estate 64,701
4.01
153,239
3.94

Total fixed-rate purchased/participations 543,473
3.73
720,253
3.64

Adjustable-rate:
Correspondent - one- to four-family 84,404
3.02
95,803
2.90

Participations - commercial real estate 2,992
3.25
47,876
4.29

Total adjustable-rate purchased/participations 87,396
3.03
143,679
3.36

Total purchased/participation loans $ 630,869
3.64
$ 863,932
3.60

One- to Four-Family Loans - The following table presents, for our portfolio of one- to four-family loans, the amount, percent of total, weighted average credit score, weighted average LTV ratio, and ~~the~~ average balance per loan as of the dates presented. Credit scores are updated at least ~~semiannually,~~annually, with the latest update in September ~~2017,~~2020, from a nationally recognized consumer rating agency. The LTV ratios were based on the current loan balance and either the lesser of the purchase price or original appraisal, or the most recent Bank appraisal, if available. In most cases, the most recent appraisal was obtained at the time of origination.


	September 30, 2020
			% of		Credit			Average
	Amount		Total		Score	LTV		Balance
	(Dollars in thousands)
Originated	$	3,937,310	63.0	%	771	62	%	$	145
Correspondent purchased	2,101,082		33.6		765	64		379
Bulk purchased	208,427		3.4		767	60		300
	$	6,246,819	100.0	%	768	63		187

	September 30, 2019
			% of		Credit			Average
	Amount		Total		Score	LTV		Balance
	(Dollars in thousands)
Originated	$	3,873,851	59.8	%	768	62	%	$	140
Correspondent purchased	2,349,877		36.3		765	65		371
Bulk purchased	252,347		3.9		762	61		304
	$	6,476,075	100.0	%	767	63		186

September 30, 2017
% of Credit Average
Amount Total Score LTV Balance
(Dollars in thousands)
Originated $ 3,959,232
58.6 % 767
63 % $ 135
Correspondent purchased 2,445,311
36.2
764
68
375
Bulk purchased 351,705
5.2
757
63
305
$ 6,756,248
100.0 % 765
65
182

September 30, 2016
% of Credit Average
Amount Total Score LTV Balance
(Dollars in thousands)
Originated $ 4,005,615
60.4 % 766
63 % $ 132
Correspondent purchased 2,206,072
33.3
764
68
360
Bulk purchased 416,653
6.3
753
64
308
$ 6,628,340
100.0 % 765
65
175

The following table presents originated, refinanced, and correspondent purchased activity in our one- to four-family loan portfolio, excluding endorsement activity, along with associated weighted average LTVs and weighted average credit scores for the periods indicated. Included in the "Refinanced by Bank customers" line item are correspondent loans that were refinanced with the Bank. Of the loans originated during the current year, ~~$115.4~~$300.4 million were refinanced from ~~another lender.~~other lenders. Of the loans originated and refinanced during the current year, ~~72%~~76% had loan values of ~~$424~~$510 thousand or less. Of the correspondent loans purchased during the current year, ~~12%~~20% had loan values of ~~$424~~$510 thousand or less.


	For the Year Ended
	September 30, 2020					September 30, 2019
					Credit					Credit
	Amount		LTV		Score	Amount		LTV		Score
	(Dollars in thousands)
Originated	$	662,678	74	%	767	$	494,739	78	%	760
Refinanced by Bank customers	268,590		67		765	86,381		68		752
Correspondent purchased	447,970		71		768	166,413		73		762

	$	1,379,238	72		767	$	747,533	76		760

For the Year Ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
Credit Credit
Amount LTV Score Amount LTV Score
(Dollars in thousands)
Originated $ 498,145
77 % 766
$ 515,395
78 % 770
Refinanced by Bank customers 120,835
66
760
147,855
66
765
Correspondent purchased 563,176
74
765
662,817
74
763
$ 1,182,156
74
765
$ 1,326,067
75
766

The following table presents the amount, percent of total, and weighted average rate, by state, of one- to four-family loan originations and correspondent purchases where originations and purchases in the state exceeded five percent of the total amount originated and purchased during the year ended September 30, ~~2017.~~ 2020.


State	Amount		% of Total		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Kansas	$	804,919	58.4	%	3.15	%
Missouri	234,730		17.0		3.20
Texas	177,752		12.9		3.23
Other states	161,837		11.7		3.32


	$	1,379,238	100.0	%	3.19

State Amount % of Total Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Kansas $ 554,282
46.9 % 3.51 %
Texas 223,289
18.9
3.58
Missouri 180,426
15.3
3.59
Other states 224,159
18.9
3.58
$ 1,182,156
100.0 % 3.55

Through September 30, 2020, the Bank had processed COVID-19 loan modifications for 942 one- to four-family loans totaling $239.5 million, of which $39.8 million, or 17%, were still in the deferral period as of September 30, 2020. Of the COVID-19 loan modifications that had completed the deferral period by September 30, 2020 and were not delinquent prior to requesting assistance, $1.4 million were 30 to 89 days delinquent and none were 90 or more days delinquent as of September 30, 2020.

~~One- to Four-Family Loan Commitments -~~

The modifications still in the deferral period as of September 30, 2020 are summarized in the table below, along with the weighted average credit score and weighted average LTV as of September 30, 2020. Credit scores were updated in September 2020 from a nationally recognized consumer rating agency. The LTV ratios were based on the current loan balance and either the lesser of the purchase price or original appraisal, or the most recent Bank appraisal, if available. In most cases, the most recent appraisal was obtained at the time of origination.


				Credit
	Count	Amount		Score	LTV
	(Dollars in thousands)
Originated	159	$	26,859	715	67	%
Correspondent purchased	34	12,984		749	67

	193	$	39,843	727	67

The following table summarizes our one- to four-family loan origination and refinance commitments and one- to four-family correspondent loan purchase commitments as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, along with associated weighted average rates. Loan commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a rate lock fee. It is expected that some of the loan commitments will expire unfunded, so the amounts reflected in the table below are not necessarily indicative of our future cash needs.


	Fixed-Rate
	15 years			More than			Adjustable-			Total
	or less			15 years			Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Originate/refinance	$	35,869		$	56,110		$	11,300		$	103,279	2.87	%
Correspondent	15,687			49,912			5,080			70,679		2.89
	$	51,556		$	106,022		$	16,380		$	173,958	2.88

Rate	2.49		%	3.08		%	2.79		%

Fixed-Rate
15 years More than Adjustable- Total
or less 15 years Rate Amount Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Originate/refinance $ 9,185
$ 27,814
$ 9,790
$ 46,789
3.58 %
Correspondent 5,555
68,930
7,100
81,585
3.88
$ 14,740
$ 96,744
$ 16,890
$ 128,374
3.77

Rate 3.21 % 3.94 % 3.28 %

Commercial ~~Real Estate~~ Loans - During ~~the current~~ fiscal year 2020, the Bank originated $165.5 million of commercial loans, of which $43.9 million were PPP loans, entered into commercial real estate loan participations totaling $93.6 million, and processed commercial loan disbursements, excluding lines of ~~$67.7~~credit, of approximately $228.7 million ~~which included $54.0 million~~at a weighted average rate of commercial real estate construction loans. The majority of the $54.0 million of commercial real estate construction loans had not yet been funded as of September 30, 2017. As of September 30, 2017, $87.0 million of the Bank's $270.0 million outstanding commercial real estate portfolio were construction loans, with an additional $105.9 million of undisbursed amounts. The Bank intends to continue to grow its commercial real estate loan portfolio through participations with correspondent lenders and other select lead banks.3.78%.

The following table presents the Bank's commercial real estate and commercial construction loans and loan commitments by ~~industry classification, as defined by the North American Industry Classification System,~~type of primary collateral, as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Included in the gross loan amounts in the table, which does not include outstanding commitments, are fixed-rate loans totaling ~~$294.8~~$534.6 million at a weighted average rate of ~~4.05%~~4.15% and adjustable-rate loans totaling ~~$128.4~~$331.1 million at a weighted average rate of ~~4.46%~~4.38%. The weighted average rate of fixed-rate loans is lower than that of adjustable-rate loans due primarily to the majority of the fixed-rate loans in the portfolio at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 having shorter ~~terms. Based on~~terms to maturity. Because the ~~terms of~~commitments to pay out undisbursed funds are not cancellable by the ~~construction loans as of September 30, 2017, of~~Bank, unless the ~~$105.9 million of undisbursed amounts~~loan is in default, we anticipate fully funding the table, approximately $31.0 million is projected to be disbursed by December 31, 2017, and an additional $55.7 million is projected to be disbursed by September 30, 2018. It is possible that not all of the funds will be disbursed due to the nature of the funding of constructionrelated projects. ~~For outstanding commitments, in certain cases, the weighted average rate presented represents our best estimate.~~


		Unpaid			Undisbursed			Gross Loan			Outstanding						% of
	Count	Principal			Amount			Amount			Commitments			Total			Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Senior housing	25	$	225,062		$	32,638		$	257,700		$	—		$	257,700		27.5	%
Hotel	9	129,488			49,686			179,174			—			179,174			19.1
Retail building	133	126,439			11,960			138,399			1,771			140,170			14.9
Office building	98	56,131			4,745			60,876			60,875			121,751			13.0
Multi-family	40	63,115			18,801			81,916			2,800			84,716			9.0
One- to four-family property	391	57,754			7,251			65,005			215			65,220			7.0
Single use building	21	43,596			5,163			48,759			1,500			50,259			5.4
Other	91	30,461			3,459			33,920			4,598			38,518			4.1
	808	$	732,046		$	133,703		$	865,749		$	71,759		$	937,508		100.0	%

Weighted average rate		4.25		%	4.19		%	4.24		%	4.05		%	4.23		%

Unpaid Undisbursed Gross Loan Outstanding % of
Principal Amount Amount Commitments Total Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Accommodation and food services $ 123,839
$ 16,664
$ 140,503
$ 24,700
$ 165,203
39.0 %
Health care and social assistance 38,273
49,563
87,836
—
87,836
20.8
Real estate rental and leasing 23,420
37,835
61,255
1,650
62,905
14.9
Arts, entertainment, and recreation 33,944
—
33,944
—
33,944
8.0
Multi-family 10,322
—
10,322
20,950
31,272
7.4
Retail trade 25,480
1,822
27,302
—
27,302
6.4
Other 14,704
—
14,704
—
14,704
3.5
$ 269,982
$ 105,884
$ 375,866
$ 47,300
$ 423,166
100.0 %

Weighted average rate 4.10 % 4.34 % 4.17 % 4.22 % 4.17 %

The following table summarizes the Bank's commercial real estate and commercial construction loans and loan commitments by state as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.


		Unpaid		Undisbursed		Gross Loan		Outstanding				% of
	Count	Principal		Amount		Amount		Commitments		Total		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Kansas	627	$	285,184	$	15,744	$	300,928	$	8,254	$	309,182	33.0	%
Missouri	149	227,101		56,545		283,646		2,005		285,651		30.5
Texas	9	117,675		53,107		170,782		60,000		230,782		24.6
Nebraska	6	33,820		16		33,836		—		33,836		3.6
Kentucky	1	25,450		109		25,559		—		25,559		2.7
California	3	5,843		4,300		10,143		1,500		11,643		1.2
Other	13	36,973		3,882		40,855		—		40,855		4.4
	808	$	732,046	$	133,703	$	865,749	$	71,759	$	937,508	100.0	%

Unpaid Undisbursed Gross Loan Outstanding % of
Principal Amount Amount Commitments Total Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Texas $ 89,647
$ 54,280
$ 143,927
$ 24,700
$ 168,627
39.8 %
Missouri 74,297
50,104
124,401
—
124,401
29.4
Kansas 75,381
—
75,381
—
75,381
17.8
Nebraska —
—
—
20,950
20,950
5.0
Colorado 14,731
—
14,731
1,650
16,381
3.9
Arkansas 8,006
—
8,006
—
8,006
1.9
California 6,471
—
6,471
—
6,471
1.5
Montana 1,449
1,500
2,949
—
2,949
0.7
$ 269,982
$ 105,884
$ 375,866
$ 47,300
$ 423,166
100.0 %

The following table presents the Bank's commercial ~~real estate~~and industrial loans and loan commitments by business purpose, as of September 30, 2020. Including in the working capital loan category are $43.9 million of PPP loans.


		Unpaid		Undisbursed		Gross Loan		Outstanding				% of
	Count	Principal		Amount		Amount		Commitments		Total		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Working capital	942	$	56,348	$	17,237	$	73,585	$	331	$	73,916	62.0	%
Equipment	119	14,184		303		14,487		850		15,337		12.9
Purchase/lease autos	178	11,275		97		11,372		—		11,372		9.5
Business investment	70	11,029		80		11,109		—		11,109		9.3
Other	22	4,778		2,785		7,563		—		7,563		6.3

	1,331	$	97,614	$	20,502	$	118,116	$	1,181	$	119,297	100.0	%

The following table presents the Bank's commercial loan portfolio and outstanding loan commitments, categorized by gross loan amount (unpaid principal plus undisbursed amounts) or outstanding loan commitment amount, as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.


	Count		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Greater than $30 million	$	4	$	181,677
>$15 to $30 million	13		314,054
>$10 to $15 million	3		34,761
>$5 to $10 million	13		81,202
$1 to $5 million	103		217,178
Less than $1 million	2,003		227,933
	$	2,139	$	1,056,805

The Bank's commercial lending team is working proactively with our commercial customers as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to present challenging operating conditions. Through September 30, 2020, we have modified $410.9 million of commercial loans under our COVID-19 loan modification program. Of this amount, $43.5 million had completed the deferral period by September 30, 2020, all of which were current, and $367.4 million, or 89%, were still in the deferral period as of September 30, 2020. We have also processed 791 PPP loans for $43.9 million, for which we received approximately $1.9 million in fees. Approximately 60% of PPP loans processed were in the following industries: construction, professional/scientific/technical, health care/social assistance, and retail trade. Through November 16, 2020, $12.2 million of the Bank's PPP loans have been forgiven by the SBA.

The following table presents the gross loan amount, including undisbursed balances, of the Bank's commercial real estate loans by type of primary collateral, and commercial and industrial loans by business purpose, that have been modified per the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program, and had not completed the deferral period as of September 30, 2020. The information is presented by type of modification and as a percentage of total modifications, as well as by a percentage of the total gross loan amount and undisbursed balances of the related property type or business purpose category. Of the loans presented in the table below, $258.8 million, or 70%, completed their deferral period by November 16, 2020, and an additional $57.4 million was paid off in October 2020.


	Modification Type								% of
	Interest		Payment				% of		Property Type/
	Only		Deferral		Total		Total		Business Purpose
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Senior housing	$	115,082	$	57,258	$	172,340	46.9	%	66.9	%
Hotel	76,208		10,049		86,257		23.5		48.1
Retail building	27,197		5,815		33,012		9.0		23.9
Multi-family	30,304		1,625		31,929		8.7		65.5
One- to four-family property	14,618		4,375		18,993		5.2		31.2
Office building	7,643		336		7,979		2.2		12.3
Single use building	7,390		—		7,390		2.0		9.0
Other	2,318		—		2,318		0.6		6.8
	280,760		79,458		360,218		98.1		41.6
Commercial and industrial
Working capital	4,136		—		4,136		1.1		32.7
Equipment	848		—		848		0.2		1.2
Business investment	719		—		719		0.2		5.5
Purchase/lease autos	651		—		651		0.2		5.7
Other	786		—		786		0.2		32.6
	7,140		—		7,140		1.9		6.0
Total	$	287,900	$	79,458	$	367,358	100.0	%	37.3

Count Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
Greater than $30 million 4
$ 157,180
>$15 to $30 million 6
142,530
>$10 to $15 million 2
25,855
>$5 to $10 million 3
24,350
$1 to $5 million 23
66,119
Less than $1 million 16
7,132
54
$ 423,166
Of the commercial loans modified under the COVID-19 loan modification program, through November 16, 2020, we have received or are expecting to receive requests for additional assistance on loans with a combined gross loan amount, including undisbursed balances, of $87.4 million. This amount includes $14.6 million of loans that had exited the initial deferral period by September 30, 2020, and $72.8 million that are included in the table above, of which $69.0 million were in their second deferral as of September 30, 2020. The Bank is evaluating requests for additional assistance as they are received.

Securities. Securities increased $338.2 million from $1.19 billion at September 30, 2019 to $1.53 billion at September 30, 2020. The weighted average yield on the securities portfolio decreased 92 basis points, from 2.54% at September 30, 2019 to 1.62% at September 30, 2020, due primarily to purchases at lower market yields during the current year. The following table presents the distribution of our securities portfolio, at amortized cost, at the dates indicated. Overall, fixed-rate securities comprised ~~75%~~87% of our securities portfolio at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. The weighted average life ("WAL") is the estimated remaining maturity (in years) after three-month historical prepayment speeds and projected call option assumptions have been applied.Weighted average yields on tax-exempt securities are not calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.


	September 30, 2020					September 30, 2019
	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL
	(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed-rate securities:
MBS	$	945,432	1.82	%	3.7	$	625,840	2.46	%	2.9
GSE debentures	369,967		0.62		1.7	249,828		2.15		0.7
Municipal bonds	9,716		1.69		0.7	18,371		1.63		1.0
Total fixed-rate securities	1,325,115		1.49		3.1	894,039		2.35		2.3

Adjustable-rate securities:
MBS	204,490		2.49		2.9	297,416		3.10		4.7


Total securities portfolio	$	1,529,605	1.62		3.1	$	1,191,455	2.54		2.9

September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL
(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed-rate securities:
MBS $ 632,422
2.14 % 2.9
$ 836,852
2.16 % 2.9
GSE debentures 271,300
1.29
1.3
346,226
1.15
0.9
Municipal bonds 28,337
1.65
2.0
33,303
1.69
2.4
Total fixed-rate securities 932,059
1.88
2.4
1,216,381
1.86
2.3

Adjustable-rate securities:
MBS 304,153
2.55
4.6
400,161
2.25
4.7
TRUPs 2,067
2.58
19.7
2,123
2.11
20.7
Total adjustable-rate securities 306,220
2.55
4.7
402,284
2.24
4.8
Total securities portfolio $ 1,238,279
2.05
3.0
$ 1,618,665
1.95
2.9

The following table presents the carrying value of MBS in our portfolio by issuer at the dates presented.


	At September 30,
	2020		2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
FNMA	$	809,232	$	656,799
FHLMC	327,167		208,745
Government National Mortgage Association	44,404		70,943

	$	1,180,803	$	936,487

At September 30,
2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
FNMA $ 575,142
$ 752,141
FHLMC 306,196
413,458
Government National Mortgage Association 61,109
80,479
$ 942,447
$ 1,246,078

Mortgage-Backed Securities -The balance of MBS, which primarily consists of securities of U.S. GSEs, ~~decreased $303.6~~increased $244.3 million ~~from $1.25~~to $1.18 billion at September 30, ~~2016 to $942.4~~2020 from $936.5 million at September 30, ~~2017.~~2019. The following tables summarize the activity in our portfolio of MBS for the periods presented. The weighted average yields and WALs for purchases are presented as recorded at the time of purchase. The weighted average yields for the beginning balances are as of the last day of the period previous to the period presented and the weighted average yields for the ending balances are as of the last day of the period presented and are generally derived from recent prepayment activity on the securities in the portfolio as of the dates presented. The beginning and ending WAL isare the estimated remaining principal repayment term (in years) after three-month historical prepayment speeds have been applied.


	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2020					June 30, 2020					March 31, 2020					December 31, 2019
	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value	$	982,587	2.35	%	3.3	$	973,318	2.50	%	3.6	$	937,317	2.61	%	3.3	$	936,487	2.67	%	3.5
Maturities and repayments	(95,842)					(75,293)					(65,767)					(72,635)
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts	(608)					(363)					(279)					(248)
Purchases:
Fixed	297,024		1.06		5.9	77,455		1.29		5.0	88,863		1.80		4.5	74,359		2.05		3.8
Adjustable	—		—		—	—		—		—	—		—		—	—		—		—


Change in valuation on AFS securities	(2,358)					7,470					13,184					(646)
Ending balance - carrying value	$	1,180,803	1.94		3.5	$	982,587	2.35		3.3	$	973,318	2.50		3.6	$	937,317	2.61		3.3


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020					2019
	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value	$	936,487	2.67	%	3.5	$	1,036,990	2.57	%	3.4
Maturities and repayments	(309,537)					(275,116)
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts	(1,498)					(1,304)
Purchases:
Fixed	537,701		1.35		5.2	77,755		2.53		4.1
Adjustable	—		—		—	84,138		2.74		4.4

Valuation transferred from HTM to AFS	—					3,039
Change in valuation on AFS securities	17,650					10,985
Ending balance - carrying value	$	1,180,803	1.94		3.5	$	936,487	2.67		3.5

For the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value $ 1,017,145
2.26 % 3.6
$ 1,090,870
2.25 % 3.9
$ 1,166,326
2.18 % 3.5
$ 1,246,078
2.19 % 3.5
Maturities and repayments (72,966 ) (71,763 ) (73,801 ) (88,564 )
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts (937 ) (992 ) (1,015 ) (1,290 )
Purchases:
Fixed —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10,890
1.99
3.8
Adjustable —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Change in valuation on AFS securities (795 ) (970 ) (640 ) (788 )
Ending balance - carrying value $ 942,447
2.28
3.5
$ 1,017,145
2.26
3.6
$ 1,090,870
2.25
3.9
$ 1,166,326
2.18
3.5

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value $ 1,246,078
2.19 % 3.5
$ 1,462,539
2.24 % 3.8
Maturities and repayments (307,094 ) (350,990 )
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts (4,234 ) (5,011 )
Purchases:
Fixed 10,890
1.99
3.8
42,827
1.83
4.1
Adjustable —
—
—
100,133
2.02
5.4
Change in valuation on AFS securities (3,193 ) (3,420 )
Ending balance - carrying value $ 942,447
2.28
3.5
$ 1,246,078
2.19
3.5

Investment Securities -Investment securities, which consist of U.S. GSE debentures (primarily issued by FNMA, FHLMC, or Federal Home Loan Banks) and municipal investments, ~~decreased $81.0~~increased $111.8 million ~~from $382.1~~to $380.1 million at September 30, ~~2016 to $301.1~~2020 from $268.4 million at September 30, ~~2017.~~2019. Municipal investments totaled $9.7 million at September 30, 2020. The following tables summarize the activity of investment securities for the periods presented. The weighted average yields and WALs for purchases are presented as recorded at the time of purchase. The weighted average yields for the beginning balances are as of the last day of the period previous to the period presented and the weighted average yields for the ending balances are as of the last day of the period presented. The beginning and ending WALs represent the estimated remaining principal repayment terms (in years) of the securities after projected call dates have been considered, based upon market rates at each date presented.


	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2020					June 30, 2020					March 31, 2020					December 31, 2019
	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value	$	237,467	1.23	%	0.8	$	262,719	1.87	%	0.3	$	292,270	2.00	%	0.8	$	268,376	2.11	%	0.8
Maturities, calls and sales	(102,115)					(125,000)					(80,125)					(51,175)
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts	(54)					(80)					(49)					20
Purchases:
Fixed	244,975		0.51		3.2	99,990		0.58		1.2	50,097		1.42		0.4	75,000		1.90		1.7



Change in valuation on AFS securities	(126)					(162)					526					49
Ending balance - carrying value	$	380,147	0.65		1.7	$	237,467	1.23		0.8	$	262,719	1.87		0.3	$	292,270	2.00		0.8


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020					2019
	Amount		Yield		WAL	Amount		Yield		WAL
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value	$	268,376	2.11	%	0.8	$	289,942	2.05	%	2.2
Maturities, calls and sales	(358,415)					(249,771)
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts	(163)					62
Purchases:
Fixed	470,062		0.84		2.3	224,809		2.44		0.9


Valuation transferred from HTM to AFS	—					47
Change in valuation on AFS securities	287					3,287
Ending balance - carrying value	$	380,147	0.65		1.7	$	268,376	2.11		0.8

For the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value $ 326,786
1.29 % 1.6
$ 328,323
1.29 % 1.9
$ 355,681
1.27 % 2.0
$ 382,097
1.20 % 1.2
Maturities and calls (25,818 ) (1,538 ) (28,863 ) (50,019 )
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts (55 ) (57 ) (61 ) (72 )
Purchases:
Fixed —
—
—
—
—
—
1,535
1.30
3.4
25,000
1.70
4.0
Change in valuation on AFS securities 209
58
31
(1,325 )
Ending balance - carrying value $ 301,122
1.33
1.5
$ 326,786
1.29
1.6
$ 328,323
1.29
1.9
$ 355,681
1.27
2.0

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Amount Yield WAL Amount Yield WAL
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value $ 382,097
1.20 % 1.2
$ 566,754
1.19 % 1.8
Maturities and calls (106,238 ) (285,152 )
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts (245 ) (331 )
Purchases:
Fixed 26,535
1.68
4.0
101,359
1.09
0.8
Change in valuation on AFS securities (1,027 ) (533 )
Ending balance - carrying value $ 301,122
1.33
1.5
$ 382,097
1.20
1.2

Liabilities.Total liabilities at September 30, 2020 were ~~$7.82~~$8.20 billion, an increase of $198.7 million, or 2.5% from September 30, 2019. The increase was due to an increase in deposits, partially offset by a decrease in borrowings.

Deposits.Total deposits were $6.19 billion at September 30, ~~2017 compared to $7.87 billion at~~2020, an increase of $609.5 million, or 10.9%, from September 30, ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~decrease~~increase in ~~total liabilities~~retail and business deposit balances was due primarily to economic stimulus payments, a reduction in consumer spending, and PPP loan proceeds being deposited at the Bank. Also, the Bank secured a new business deposit relationship during the current year which brought in $163.6 million of new deposit balances. Because some of these deposits related to the new business deposit relationship are COVID-19 related payments, we do not ~~replacing certain maturing FHLB advances, partially offset by an~~expect the full balance of the deposits received during fiscal year 2020 to be retained through fiscal year 2021. As previously noted, since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bank has lowered rates paid on money market accounts and certificate of deposit products. Despite this, money market accounts increased $220.8 million and certificate of deposit accounts increased $73.8 million during the current fiscal year. The increase in ~~deposits.~~

~~Deposits~~ -~~Deposits were $5.31 billion at September 30, 2017 compared~~the certificate of deposit accounts was primarily related to ~~$5.16 billion at September 30, 2016. The increase was due mainly to increases in wholesale certificates and non-maturity~~business accounts. As retail ~~deposits. We continue to be competitive on deposit rates and, in some cases, our offer rates for longer-term~~ certificates of deposit ~~have been higher than peers. Offering competitive rates on longer-term~~matured during the current year, not all were renewed. Rather, customers moved some of those funds to more liquid investment options, such as the Bank's money market accounts. During fiscal year 2020, the Bank's weighted average retention rate of maturing retail certificates of deposit ~~has been an on-going balance sheet strategy by management in anticipation of higher interest rates. If short-term interest rates continue~~was approximately 80%, compared to rise, our customers may move funds from their checking, savings and money market accounts to higher yielding deposit products within the Bank or withdraw their funds from these accounts, including certificates of deposit, to invest in higher yielding investments outside of the Bank.

approximately 85% during fiscal year 2019.

The following table presents the amount, weighted average rate and percent of total for the components of our deposit portfolio at the dates presented.


	At September 30,													At September 30,
	2017						2016							2020						2019
					% of						% of							% of						% of
	Amount		Rate		Total		Amount		Rate		Total			Amount		Rate		Total		Amount		Rate		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)													(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing checking	$	243,670	—	%	4.6	%	$	217,009	—	%	4.2	%	Non-interest-bearing checking	$	451,394	—	%	7.3	%	$	357,284	—	%	6.4	%
Interest-bearing checking	615,615		0.05		11.6		597,319		0.05		11.6		Interest-bearing checking	865,782		0.10		14.0		717,121		0.09		12.8
Savings	349,977		0.24		6.6		335,426		0.17		6.5		Savings	433,808		0.06		7.0		321,494		0.05		5.8
Money market	1,190,185		0.24		22.4		1,186,132		0.24		23.0		Money market	1,419,180		0.37		22.9		1,198,343		0.70		21.5
Retail certificates of deposit	2,450,418		1.52		46.1		2,458,160		1.43		47.6
Public units	460,003		1.28		8.7		369,972		0.70		7.1
Retail/business certificates of deposit													Retail/business certificates of deposit	2,766,461		1.83		44.7		2,692,770		2.08		48.2
Public unit certificates of deposit													Public unit certificates of deposit	254,783		0.74		4.1		294,855		2.29		5.3
	$	5,309,868	0.89		100.0	%	$	5,164,018	0.80		100.0	%		$	6,191,408	0.95		100.0	%	$	5,581,867	1.29		100.0	%

The following tables set forth scheduled maturity information for our certificates of deposit, including public ~~units,~~unit certificates of deposit, along with associated weighted average rates, at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.


	Amount Due																	Amount Due
				More than			More than														More than			More than
	1 year			1 year to			2 years to 3			More than			Total					1 year			1 year to			2 years to 3			More than			Total
Rate range	or less			2 years			years			3 years			Amount		Rate		Rate range	or less			2 years			years			3 years			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)																	(Dollars in thousands)
0.00 – 0.99%	$	469,691		$	78,910		$	84		$	—		$	548,685	0.74	%	0.00 – 0.99%	$	449,875		$	55,037		$	8,103		$	1,374		$	514,389	0.55	%
1.00 – 1.99%	645,723			619,783			478,619			422,071			2,166,196		1.60		1.00 – 1.99%	713,300			355,888			104,335			186,939			1,360,462		1.65
2.00 – 2.99%	1,001			49,844			113,263			31,432			195,540		2.24		2.00 – 2.99%	342,326			362,353			313,831			127,632			1,146,142		2.38
3.00 – 3.99%																	3.00 – 3.99%	—			—			251			—			251		3.00

	$	1,116,415		$	748,537		$	591,966		$	453,503		$	2,910,421	1.48			$	1,505,501		$	773,278		$	426,520		$	315,945		$	3,021,244	1.74

Percent of total	38.4		%	25.7		%	20.3		%	15.6		%					Percent of total	49.8		%	25.6		%	14.1		%	10.5		%
Weighted average rate	1.08			1.52			1.86			1.93							Weighted average rate	1.46			1.99			2.16			1.88
Weighted average maturity (in years)	0.4			1.5			2.5			3.9			1.7				Weighted average maturity (in years)	0.5			1.5			2.4			3.7			1.4
Weighted average maturity for the retail certificate of deposit portfolio (in years)													1.8
Weighted average maturity for the retail/business certificate of deposit portfolio (in years)																	Weighted average maturity for the retail/business certificate of deposit portfolio (in years)													1.5


	Amount Due
			Over		Over
	3 months		3 to 6		6 to 12		Over
	or less		months		months		12 months		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Retail/business certificates of deposit less than $100,000	$	177,414	$	167,073	$	337,599	$	840,713	$	1,522,799
Retail/business certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more	134,441		140,790		310,654		657,777		1,243,662

Public unit certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more	100,761		39,310		97,459		17,253		254,783
	$	412,616	$	347,173	$	745,712	$	1,515,743	$	3,021,244

Borrowings. Total borrowings at September 30, 2020 were $1.79 billion, a decrease of $450.7 million, or 20.1%, from September 30, 2019. As a result of excess liquidity due primarily to the inflow of deposits, management elected to reduce the Bank's level of borrowing during the current fiscal year. Not all maturing FHLB advances and repurchase agreement were renewed and the FHLB line of credit balance was paid off during the year.

Amount Due
Over Over
3 months 3 to 6 6 to 12 Over
or less months months 12 months Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Retail certificates of deposit less than $100,000 $ 173,572
$ 151,496
$ 244,242
$ 942,200
$ 1,511,510
Retail certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more 77,341
66,645
114,642
680,280
938,908
Public unit deposits of $100,000 or more 149,081
82,462
56,934
171,526
460,003
$ 399,994
$ 300,603
$ 415,818
$ 1,794,006
$ 2,910,421

~~Borrowings~~ -

The following tables present borrowing activity for the periods shown. The borrowings presented in the table have original contractual terms of one year or longer or are tied to interest rate swaps with original contractual terms of one year or longer. Excluded from this table is a $3.0 million FHLB advance that had an original contractual term of less than one year. FHLB advances are presented at par. The effective rate is shown as a weighted average ~~effective rate~~and includes the impact of interest rate swaps and the amortization of deferred prepayment penalties resulting from FHLB advances previously prepaid. The weighted average maturity ("WAM") is the remaining weighted average contractual term in years. The beginning and ending WAMs represent the remaining maturity at each date presented. For new borrowings, the WAMs presented are as of the date of issue.


	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2020					June 30, 2020					March 31, 2020					December 31, 2019
			Effective					Effective					Effective					Effective
	Amount		Rate		WAM	Amount		Rate		WAM	Amount		Rate		WAM	Amount		Rate		WAM
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	1,990,000	2.29	%	2.9	$	2,090,000	2.25	%	3.0	$	2,090,000	2.37	%	2.6	$	2,140,000	2.38	%	2.6
Maturities and prepayments:
FHLB advances	(440,000)		2.49			(200,000)		2.35			(415,000)		2.45			(350,000)		2.40
Repurchase agreements	(100,000)		2.53			—		—			—		—			—		—

New FHLB borrowings:
Fixed-rate	—		—		—	—		—		—	350,000		1.70		4.7	100,000		1.96		5.0
Interest rate swaps(1)	340,000		2.73		3.5	100,000		3.20		8.0	65,000		2.61		4.0	200,000		2.57		2.5

Ending balance	$	1,790,000	2.31		3.0	$	1,990,000	2.29		2.9	$	2,090,000	2.25		3.0	$	2,090,000	2.37		2.6


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020					2019
			Effective					Effective
	Amount		Rate		WAM	Amount		Rate		WAM
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	2,140,000	2.38	%	2.6	$	2,185,052	2.17	%	2.9
Maturities and prepayments:
FHLB advances	(1,405,000)		2.44			(875,000)		2.10
Repurchase agreements	(100,000)		2.53			—		—
CCB acquisition - junior subordinated debentures assumed (redeemed)	—		—		—	(10,052)		8.76		12.3
New FHLB borrowings:
Fixed-rate	450,000		1.76		4.8	200,000		2.77		4.5
Interest rate swaps(1)	705,000		2.74		3.9	640,000		2.67		5.0

Ending balance	$	1,790,000	2.31		3.0	$	2,140,000	2.38		2.6

(1)Represents adjustable-rate FHLB advances for which the Bank has entered into interest rate swaps to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with the advances. The effective rate and WAM presented include the effect of the interest rate swaps.

For the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Effective Effective Effective Effective
Amount Rate WAM Amount Rate WAM Amount Rate WAM Amount Rate WAM
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance $ 2,175,000
2.23 % 2.5
$ 2,475,000
2.35 % 2.5
$ 2,475,000
2.35 % 2.7
$ 2,575,000
2.29 % 2.9
Maturities:
FHLB advances (100,000 ) 3.12
(300,000 ) 3.24
—
—
(100,000 ) 0.78

New FHLB borrowings:
Fixed-rate 100,000
1.85
3.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Interest rate swaps⁽¹⁾
200,000
2.05
6.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Ending balance $ 2,375,000
2.16
2.7
$ 2,175,000
2.23
2.5
$ 2,475,000
2.35
2.5
$ 2,475,000
2.35
2.7

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Effective Effective
Amount Rate WAM Amount Rate WAM
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance $ 2,575,000
2.29 % 2.9
$ 2,775,000
2.29 % 3.3
Maturities:
FHLB advances (500,000 ) 2.72
(400,000 ) 1.97

New FHLB borrowings:
Fixed-rate 100,000
1.85
3.0
200,000
1.64
5.0
Interest rate swaps⁽¹⁾
200,000
2.05
6.0
—
—
—
Ending balance $ 2,375,000
2.16
2.7
$ 2,575,000
2.29
2.9

~~(1)~~

Represents adjustable-rate FHLB advances for which the Bank has entered into interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $200.0 million to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with the advances. The effective rate and WAM presented include the effect of the interest rate swaps. Excluding the effect of the interest rate swaps, the weighted average effective rate of the adjustable-rate FHLB advances was 1.30% and the WAM as of the date of issue was one year.

Maturities -The following table presents the maturity of term borrowings ~~(including~~(which includes FHLB advances, at par, and repurchase agreements), along with associated weighted average contractual and effective rates as of September 30, ~~2017. During the current~~2020. The weighted average effective rate for term borrowings decreased seven basis points during fiscal year 2020, to 2.31% at September 30, 2020. The decrease in the effective rate was due primarily to FHLB advances being replaced at lower market interest rates.


	Term Borrowings Amount
Maturity by			Interest rate		Total		Effective
Fiscal Year	Fixed-rate		swaps(1)		Amount		Rate(2)
	(Dollars in thousands)
2021	203,000		640,000		843,000		2.56	%
2022	200,000		—		200,000		2.23
2023	300,000		—		300,000		1.81
2024	100,000		—		100,000		3.39
2025	250,000		—		250,000		1.94
2026	100,000		—		100,000		1.60

	$	1,153,000	$	640,000	$	1,793,000	2.31

(1)Represents adjustable-rate FHLB advances for which the Bank has entered into interest rate swaps with a notional amount of ~~$200.0~~$640.0 million ~~in order~~ to hedge the variability ofin cash flows associated with ~~12-month adjustable-rate FHLB~~the advances. ~~The combination~~These advances are presented based on their contractual maturity dates and will be renewed periodically until the maturity or termination of the ~~swaps with the advances creates synthetic long-term liabilities with an~~interest rate swaps. The expected WAL of ~~approximately six~~the interest rate swaps was 3.5 years at September 30, ~~2017.~~ 2020.

(2)The ~~12-month adjustable-rate~~effective rate includes the impact of interest rate swaps and the amortization of deferred prepayment penalties resulting from FHLB advances ~~are presented in the table below based on the contractual maturity date of the advance.~~previously prepaid.

FHLB Repurchase
Maturity by Advances Agreements Total Contractual Effective
Fiscal Year Amount Amount Amount Rate
Rate⁽¹⁾
(Dollars in thousands)
2018 $ 475,000
$ 100,000
$ 575,000
2.16 % 2.55 %
2019 500,000
—
500,000
1.56
1.69
2020 350,000
100,000
450,000
2.11
2.11
2021 550,000
—
550,000
2.27
2.27
2022 200,000
—
200,000
2.23
2.23
2023 100,000
—
100,000
1.82
1.82
$ 2,175,000
$ 200,000
$ 2,375,000
2.04
2.16


~~(1)~~	~~The effective rate includes the impact of interest rate swaps and the amortization of deferred prepayment penalties resulting from FHLB advances previously prepaid.~~

The following table presents the maturity and weighted average repricing rate, which is also the weighted average effective rate, of certificates of deposit, split between ~~retail~~retail/business and public unit amounts, and term borrowings for the next four quarters as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.


	Retail/ Business				Public Unit				Term
Maturity by	Certificate		Repricing		Certificate		Repricing		Borrowings		Repricing				Repricing
Quarter End	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate		Amount(1)		Rate		Total		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2020	$	311,855	1.76	%	$	100,761	0.43	%	$	53,000	1.98	%	$	465,616	1.50	%
March 31, 2021	307,863		1.78		39,310		1.19		150,000		1.97		497,173		1.79
June 30, 2021	342,662		1.51		49,185		0.48		—		—		391,847		1.38
September 30, 2021	305,591		1.40		48,274		0.95		75,000		2.99		428,865		1.63
	$	1,267,971	1.61		$	237,530	0.67		$	278,000	2.24		$	1,783,501	1.59

(1)The maturity date for FHLB advances tied to interest rate swaps is based on the maturity date of the related interest rate swap.

Retail Public Unit Term
Maturity by Certificate Repricing Deposit Repricing Borrowings Repricing Repricing
Quarter End Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate Total Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2017 $ 250,913
1.01 % $ 149,081
1.11 % $ 200,000
2.94 % $ 599,994
1.68 %
March 31, 2018 218,141
1.09
82,462
1.19
—
—
300,603
1.12
June 30, 2018 208,676
1.04
35,721
1.24
100,000
2.82
344,397
1.57
September 30, 2018 150,208
1.09
21,213
1.22
275,000
2.17
446,421
1.76
$ 827,938
1.05
$ 288,477
1.16
$ 575,000
2.55
$ 1,691,415
1.58

Stockholders' Equity. Stockholders' equity was ~~$1.37~~$1.28 billion at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$1.39~~$1.34 billion at September 30, ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~$24.7~~$51.5 million decrease was due primarily to the payment of ~~$118.0~~cash dividends totaling $93.9 million ~~in cash dividends,~~and the repurchase of common stock totaling $23.8 million, partially offset by net income of ~~$84.1 million.~~$64.5 million during the current year. The cash dividends paid during the current ~~fiscal~~ year totaled ~~$0.88~~$0.68 per share and consisted of a ~~$0.29~~$0.34 per share cash true-up dividend related to fiscal year ~~2016~~2019 earnings, paid in December 2019, per the Company's dividend policy, ~~a $0.25 per share True Blue Capitol dividend,~~ and four regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.085 per share, totaling $0.34 per share. In the long run, management considers the Bank's equity to total assets ratio of at least 10% an appropriate level of capital. At September 30, 2020, this ratio was 12.3%.

On October ~~18, 2017,~~20, 2020, the Company announced a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.085 per share, or approximately ~~$11.4~~$11.5 million, payable on November ~~17, 2017~~20, 2020 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November ~~3, 2017.~~6, 2020. On October ~~27, 2017,~~28, 2020, the Company announced a fiscal year ~~2017~~2020 cash true-up dividend of ~~$0.29~~$0.13 per share, or approximately ~~$39.0~~$17.6 million, related to fiscal year ~~2017~~2020 earnings. The ~~$0.29~~$0.13 per share cash true-up dividend was determined by taking the difference between total earnings for fiscal year ~~2017~~2020 and total regular quarterly cash dividends paid during fiscal year ~~2017,~~2020, divided by the number of shares outstanding as of October ~~24, 2017.~~16, 2020. The cash true-up dividend is payable on December ~~1, 2017~~4, 2020 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November ~~17, 2017,~~20, 2020, and is the result of the Board of Directors' commitment to distribute to stockholders 100% of the annual earnings of ~~Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.~~the Company for fiscal year ~~2017.~~2020.

During the current fiscal year, the Company repurchased $23.8 million, or 2,558,100 shares, of common stock. Subsequent to September 30, 2020, through November 24, 2020, the Company repurchased an additional $1.5 million, or 164,400 shares, of common stock. As of November 24, 2020, there was still $44.7 million authorized under the existing stock repurchase plan for additional purchases of the Company's common stock. Shares may be repurchased from time to time based upon market conditions, available liquidity and other factors. This plan has no expiration date; however, the Federal Reserve Bank's approval for the Company to repurchase shares extends through August 2021.

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., at the holding company level, had ~~$120.8~~$82.5 million on deposit at the Bank. For fiscal year ~~2018,~~2021, it is currently the ~~intent~~intention of the Board of Directors ~~and management~~ to continue ~~with~~ the payout of 100% of the Company's earnings to ~~its~~the Company's stockholders. The payout is expected to be in the form of regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.085 per share, totaling $0.34 for the year, and a cash true-up dividend equal to fiscal year ~~2018~~2021 earnings in excess of the amount paid as regular quarterly cash dividends during fiscal year ~~2018.~~2021. It is anticipated that the fiscal year ~~2018~~2021 cash true-up dividend will be paid in December ~~2018.~~2021. Dividend payments depend upon a number of factors including the Company's financial condition and results of operations, regulatory capital requirements, regulatory limitations on the Bank's ability to make capital distributions to the Company, and the amount of cash at the holding company.

~~Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.~~The Company works to find multiple ways to provide stockholder value. ~~Primarily this~~This has primarily been through ~~stock buybacks and~~ the payment of cash ~~dividends.~~dividends and stock buybacks. The Company has maintained a ~~dividend~~ policy of paying out 100% of its earnings to stockholders in the form of quarterly cash dividends and an annual cash true-up dividend in December of each year. In ~~addition, due~~order to ~~the excess capital levels at the Company and the Bank,~~provide additional stockholder value, the Company has paid ~~out~~ a True Blue Capitol cash dividend of $0.25 ~~cash~~ per share in June of each of the past ~~four years~~six years. The Company has paid the True Blue Capitol dividend primarily due to excess capital levels at the Company and ~~in December prior to that.~~Bank. The Company considers various business strategies and their impact on capital and asset measures on both a current and future basis, as well as regulatory ~~considerations, including~~ capital levels and requirements, in determining the amount, if any, and timing of the True Blue dividend. Given the state of economic uncertainty and how that may play out with the credit risk exposure in the Bank's loan portfolio, the Company elected to defer the annual True Blue dividend in June 2020 and did not ask for a regulatory non-objection at that time to move capital from the Bank to the Company to pay that dividend. It is management's intention to ask for a regulatory non-objection at some point in the future and to pay this dividend when economic conditions are more certain. It remains the Company's intention to pay out 100% of its earnings.

The following table presents regular quarterly cash dividends and special cash dividends paid in calendar years ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015.~~2018. The amounts represent cash dividends paid during each period. The ~~2017~~2020 true-up dividend amount presented represents the dividend payable on December ~~1, 2017~~6, 2020 to stockholders of record as of November ~~17, 2017.~~22, 2020.


	Calendar Year
	2020				2019				2018
	Amount		Per Share		Amount		Per Share		Amount		Per Share
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Regular quarterly dividends paid
Quarter ended March 31	$	11,733	$	0.085	$	11,700	$	0.085	$	11,427	$	0.085
Quarter ended June 30	11,733		0.085		11,708		0.085		11,429		0.085
Quarter ended September 30	11,733		0.085		11,713		0.085		11,430		0.085
Quarter ended December 31	11,517		0.085		11,731		0.085		11,696		0.085
True-up dividends paid	17,614		0.130		46,932		0.340		53,666		0.390
True Blue dividends paid	—		—		34,446		0.250		33,614		0.250
Calendar year-to-date dividends paid	$	64,330	$	0.470	$	128,230	$	0.930	$	133,262	$	0.980

Calendar Year
2017 2016 2015
Amount Per Share Amount Per Share Amount Per Share
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Regular quarterly dividends paid
Quarter ended March 31 $ 11,386
$ 0.085
$ 11,305
$ 0.085
$ 11,592
$ 0.085
Quarter ended June 30 11,409
0.085
11,314
0.085
11,585
0.085
Quarter ended September 30 11,411
0.085
11,323
0.085
11,385
0.085
Quarter ended December 31 11,427
0.085
11,363
0.085
11,303
0.085
True-up dividends paid 38,985
0.290
38,835
0.290
33,248
0.250
True Blue dividends paid 33,559
0.250
33,274
0.250
33,924
0.250
Calendar year-to-date dividends paid $ 118,177
$ 0.880
$ 117,414
$ 0.880
$ 113,037
$ 0.840

In October 2015, the Company announced a stock repurchase plan for up to $70.0 million of common stock. It is anticipated that shares will be purchased from time to time based upon market conditions and available liquidity. There is no expiration for this repurchase plan and no shares have been repurchased under this repurchase plan.

Weighted Average Yields and Rates. The following table presents the weighted average yields on interest-earning assets, the weighted average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, and the resultant interest rate spreads at the dates indicated. As previously discussed, the leverage strategy was not in place at September 30, 2017 and 2016, so the end of period yields/rates presented at September 30, 2017 and 2016 in the table below do not reflect the effects of this strategy. At September 30, 2015, $700.0 million of the leverage strategy was in place. The weighted average yields and rates include amortization of fees, costs, premiums and discounts, which are considered adjustments to yields/rates. The weighted average rate on FHLB borrowings includes the impact of interest rate swaps. Weighted average yields on tax-exempt securities are not calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.


	At September 30,
	2020		2019		2018
Yield on:
Loans receivable	3.57	%	3.81	%	3.74	%
MBS	1.94		2.67		2.57
Investment securities	0.65		2.11		2.05
FHLB stock	4.64		7.47		7.22
Cash and cash equivalents	0.09		1.80		2.19
Combined yield on interest-earning assets	3.18		3.64		3.57

Rate paid on:
Checking	0.07		0.06		0.05
Savings	0.06		0.05		0.07
Money market	0.37		0.70		0.47
Retail/business certificates	1.83		2.08		1.79
Wholesale certificates	0.74		2.29		1.89
Total deposits	0.95		1.29		1.06
Total borrowings	2.31		2.37		2.18
Combined rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities	1.26		1.60		1.39

Net interest rate spread	1.92		2.04		2.18

At September 30,
2017
2016
2015
Yield on:
Loans receivable 3.59 % 3.58 % 3.65 %
MBS 2.28
2.19
2.24
Investment securities 1.33
1.20
1.19
FHLB stock 6.47
5.98
5.98
Cash and cash equivalents 1.25
0.49
0.25
Combined yield on interest-earning assets 3.32
3.22
3.06

Rate paid on:
Checking deposits 0.04
0.04
0.04
Savings deposits 0.24
0.17
0.16
Money market deposits 0.24
0.24
0.23
Retail certificates 1.52
1.43
1.29
Wholesale certificates 1.28
0.70
0.40
Total deposits 0.89
0.80
0.72
FHLB borrowings 2.09
2.24
1.82
Repurchase agreements 2.94
2.94
2.94
Total borrowings 2.16
2.29
1.89
Combined rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities 1.28
1.30
1.21

Net interest rate spread 2.04
1.92
1.85

Rate/Volume Analysis. The table below presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, comparing fiscal years 2020 to 2019. For the comparison of fiscal years 2019 to 2018, see "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in volume, which are changes in the average balance multiplied by the previous year's average rate, and (2) changes in rate, which are changes in the average rate multiplied by the average balance from the previous year. The net changes attributable to the combined impact of both rate and volume have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020 vs. 2019
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume		Rate		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable	$	(2,074)	$	(11,661)	$	(13,735)
MBS	(612)		(2,109)		(2,721)
Investment securities	(236)		(1,663)		(1,899)
FHLB stock	(406)		(1,590)		(1,996)
Cash and cash equivalents	(1,322)		(3,303)		(4,625)
Total interest-earning assets	(4,650)		(20,326)		(24,976)

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking	65		82		147
Savings	29		66		95
Money market	(14)		(2,200)		(2,214)
Certificates of deposit	2,048		1,321		3,369
Borrowings	(8,876)		(442)		(9,318)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	(6,748)		(1,173)		(7,921)

Net change in net interest income	$	2,098	$	(19,153)	$	(17,055)

Average Balance Sheets. The following table presents the average balances of our assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity, and the related weighted average yields and rates on our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. For fiscal year 2018 information, see "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019. Weighted average yields are derived by dividing annual income by the average balance of the related assets, and weighted average rates are derived by dividing annual expense by the average balance of the related liabilities, for the periods shown. Average outstanding balances are derived from average daily balances. The weighted average yields and rates include amortization of fees, costs, premiums and discounts, which are considered adjustments to yields/rates. Weighted average yields on tax-exempt securities are not calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020						2019
	Average		Interest				Average		Interest
	Outstanding		Earned/		Yield/		Outstanding		Earned/		Yield/
	Amount		Paid		Rate		Amount		Paid		Rate
Assets:	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
One- to four-family loans	$	6,529,265	$	226,703	3.47	%	$	6,681,441	$	240,919	3.61	%
Commercial loans	785,127		37,320		4.68		701,771		34,810		4.90
Consumer loans	123,334		6,471		5.25		135,683		8,500		6.26
Total loans receivable(1)	7,437,726		270,494		3.63		7,518,895		284,229		3.77
MBS(2)	954,197		23,009		2.41		977,925		25,730		2.63
Investment securities(2)(3)	270,683		4,467		1.65		281,490		6,366		2.26
FHLB stock	100,251		5,827		5.81		106,057		7,823		7.38
Cash and cash equivalents(4)	179,142		1,181		0.65		251,015		5,806		2.28
Total interest-earning assets(1)(2)	8,941,999		304,978		3.40		9,135,382		329,954		3.61
Other non-interest-earning assets	461,614						385,803
Total assets	$	9,403,613					$	9,521,185

Liabilities and stockholders' equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking	$	1,180,110	762		0.06		$	1,073,825	615		0.06
Savings	388,662		292		0.08		342,617		197		0.06
Money market	1,252,992		6,647		0.53		1,255,001		8,861		0.71
Retail/business certificates	2,716,945		55,238		2.03		2,531,923		48,496		1.92
Wholesale certificates	282,947		4,659		1.65		369,282		8,032		2.18
Total deposits	5,821,656		67,598		1.16		5,572,648		66,201		1.19
Borrowings(5)	2,065,966		48,045		2.31		2,441,002		57,363		2.34
Total interest-bearing liabilities	7,887,622		115,643		1.46		8,013,650		123,564		1.54
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities	203,990						149,156
Stockholders' equity	1,312,001						1,358,379
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	9,403,613					$	9,521,185

Net interest income(6)			$	189,335					$	206,390
Net interest rate spread(7)(8)					1.94						2.07
Net interest-earning assets	$	1,054,377					$	1,121,732
Net interest margin(8)(9)					2.12						2.26
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities					1.13x						1.14x

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2015
Average Interest Average Interest Average Interest
Outstanding Earned/ Yield/ Outstanding Earned/ Yield/ Outstanding Earned/ Yield/
Amount Paid Rate Amount Paid Rate Amount Paid Rate
Assets: (Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable⁽¹⁾
$ 7,150,686
$ 253,393
3.54 % $ 6,766,317
$ 243,311
3.60 % $ 6,389,964
$ 235,500
3.69 %
MBS⁽²⁾
1,088,495
23,809
2.19
1,366,605
29,794
2.18
1,632,117
36,647
2.25
Investment securities⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
341,149
4,362
1.28
481,223
5,925
1.23
604,999
7,182
1.19
FHLB stock 192,896
12,233
6.34
204,894
12,252
5.98
209,743
12,556
5.99
Cash and cash equivalents⁽⁴⁾
2,114,722
19,389
0.90
2,168,896
9,831
0.45
2,125,693
5,477
0.25
Total interest-earning assets⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
10,887,948
313,186
2.87
10,987,935
301,113
2.74
10,962,516
297,362
2.71
Other non-interest-earning assets 299,338
293,692
232,234

Total assets $ 11,187,286
$ 11,281,627
$ 11,194,750

Liabilities and stockholders' equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking $ 827,677
302
0.04
$ 784,303
291
0.04
$ 727,533
274
0.04
Savings 346,495
783
0.23
326,744
603
0.18
306,456
462
0.15
Money market 1,210,644
2,868
0.24
1,173,983
2,762
0.24
1,149,203
2,679
0.23
Retail certificates 2,434,470
35,449
1.46
2,370,286
32,181
1.36
2,259,645
28,085
1.24
Wholesale certificates 391,902
3,566
0.91
370,707
2,022
0.55
312,857
1,619
0.52
Total deposits 5,211,188
42,968
0.82
5,026,023
37,859
0.75
4,755,694
33,119
0.70
FHLB borrowings⁽⁵⁾
4,269,494
68,871
1.61
4,530,835
65,091
1.43
4,646,782
67,797
1.46
Repurchase agreements 200,000
5,965
2.94
200,000
5,981
2.94
215,835
6,678
3.05
Total borrowings 4,469,494
74,836
1.67
4,730,835
71,072
1.50
4,862,617
74,475
1.53
Total interest-bearing liabilities 9,680,682
117,804
1.21
9,756,858
108,931
1.11
9,618,311
107,594
1.12
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities 124,443
120,636
108,522

Stockholders' equity 1,382,161
1,404,133
1,467,917

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 11,187,286
$ 11,281,627
$ 11,194,750

Net interest income⁽⁶⁾
$ 195,382
$ 192,182
$ 189,768

Net interest rate spread⁽⁷⁾⁽⁸⁾
1.66
1.63
1.59
Net interest-earning assets $ 1,207,266
$ 1,231,077
$ 1,344,205

Net interest margin⁽⁸⁾⁽⁹⁾
1.79
1.75
1.73
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities 1.12x
1.13x
1.14x
(1)Balances are adjusted for unearned loan fees and deferred costs. Loans that are 90 or more days delinquent are included in the loans receivable average balance with a yield of zero percent.

(2)AFS securities are adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums or discounts.


~~(1)~~	Calculated net of unearned loan fees and deferred costs. Loans that are 90 or more days delinquent are included in the loans receivable average balance with a yield of zero percent. Balances include loans receivable held-for-sale.


~~(2)~~	~~MBS and investment securities classified as AFS are stated at amortized cost, adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums or discounts.~~


~~(3)~~	The average balance of investment securities includes an average balance of nontaxable securities of $30.7 million, $37.0 million, and $37.2 million for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.


~~(4)~~	The average balance of cash and cash equivalents includes an average balance of cash related to the leverage strategy of $1.93 billion, $1.97 billion, and $1.98 billion for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

~~(5)~~

Included in this line are FHLB borrowings related to the leverage strategy with an average outstanding amount of $2.02 billion, $2.06 billion, and $2.08 billion, interest paid of $18.5 million, $10.1 million, and $5.4 million, at a rate of 0.91%, 0.48%, and 0.25% for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The FHLB advance amounts and rates included in this line include the effect of interest rate swaps and are net of deferred prepayment penalties.


~~(6)~~	Net interest income represents the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends on the balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the interest rates earned or paid on them.


~~(7)~~	~~Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.~~

~~(8)~~

The table below provides a reconciliation between certain performance ratios presented in accordance with GAAP and the performance ratios excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, which are not presented in accordance with GAAP. Management believes it is important for comparability purposes to provide the performance ratios without the leverage strategy because of the unique nature of the leverage strategy. The leverage strategy reduces some of our performance ratios due to the amount of earnings associated with the transaction in comparison to the size of the transaction, while increasing our net income.

(3)The average balance of investment securities includes an average balance of nontaxable securities of $13.8 million, and $21.6 million, for the years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2015
Actual Leverage Adjusted Actual Leverage Adjusted Actual Leverage Adjusted
(GAAP) Strategy (Non-GAAP) (GAAP) Strategy (Non-GAAP) (GAAP) Strategy (Non-GAAP)
Net interest margin 1.79 % (0.36 )% 2.15 % 1.75 % (0.35 )% 2.10 % 1.73 % (0.34 )% 2.07 %
Net interest rate spread 1.66
(0.32 ) 1.98
1.63
(0.30 ) 1.93
1.59
(0.28 ) 1.87


~~(9)~~	~~Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.~~

(4)There were no cash and cash equivalents related to the leverage strategy during the year ended September 30, 2020. The average balance of cash and cash equivalents includes an average balance of cash related to the leverage strategy of $150.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2019.

~~Rate/Volume Analysis.~~ (5)There were no borrowings related to the leverage strategy during the year ended September 30, 2020. Included in this line item, for the year ended September 30, 2019, are borrowings related to the leverage strategy with an average outstanding balance of $157.8 million and interest paid of $3.9 million, at a weighted average rate of 2.46%, and borrowings not related to the leverage strategy with an average outstanding balance of $2.28 billion and interest paid of $53.4 million, at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. The ~~table below presents~~FHLB advance amounts and rates included in this line item include the ~~amount~~effect of ~~changes in~~interest rate swaps and are net of deferred prepayment penalties.

(6)Net interest income represents the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest ~~expense for major components~~paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends on the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, ~~comparing fiscal years 2017 to 2016~~ and ~~fiscal years 2016 to 2015. For each category of~~the interest rates earned or paid on them.

(7)Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing ~~liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes~~liabilities.

(8)The table below provides a reconciliation between certain performance ratios presented in ~~volume,~~accordance with GAAP and the performance ratios excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, which are ~~changes~~not presented in accordance with GAAP. Management believes it is important for comparability purposes to provide the ~~average balance multiplied by~~performance ratios without the ~~previous year's average rate, and (2) changes in rate, which are changes in~~leverage strategy because of the ~~average rate multiplied by~~unique nature of the ~~average balance from the previous year.~~leverage strategy. The ~~net changes attributable~~leverage strategy reduces some of our performance ratios due to the ~~combined impact~~small amount of ~~both rate and volume have been allocated proportionately~~earnings associated with the transaction in comparison to the ~~changes due to volume and~~size of the ~~changes due to rate.~~transaction, while increasing our net income. The leverage strategy was not in place during fiscal year 2020. The pre-tax yield on the leverage strategy was 0.03% for the year ended September 30, 2019.


		For the Year Ended September 30,
	2019
		Actual		Leverage		Adjusted
		(GAAP)		Strategy		(Non-GAAP)
Net interest margin		2.26	%	(0.04)	%	2.30	%
Net interest rate spread		2.07		(0.03)		2.10

(9)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
Increase (Decrease) Due to Increase (Decrease) Due to
Volume Rate Total Volume Rate Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable $ 13,480
$ (3,398 ) $ 10,082
$ 13,496
$ (5,685 ) $ 7,811
MBS (6,083 ) 98
(5,985 ) (5,815 ) (1,038 ) (6,853 )
Investment securities (1,783 ) 220
(1,563 ) (1,515 ) 258
(1,257 )
FHLB stock (753 ) 734
(19 ) (261 ) (43 ) (304 )
Cash and cash equivalents (252 ) 9,810
9,558
114
4,240
4,354
Total interest-earning assets 4,609
7,464
12,073
6,019
(2,268 ) 3,751

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking 15
(5 ) 10
22
(4 ) 18
Savings 38
143
181
33
108
141
Money market 81
25
106
64
18
82
Certificates of deposit 1,067
3,745
4,812
2,057
2,442
4,499
FHLB borrowings (5,262 ) 9,042
3,780
(2,280 ) (426 ) (2,706 )
Repurchase agreements (8 ) (8 ) (16 ) (467 ) (230 ) (697 )
Total interest-bearing liabilities (4,069 ) 12,942
8,873
(571 ) 1,908
1,337

Net change in net interest income $ 8,678
$ (5,478 ) $ 3,200
$ 6,590
$ (4,176 ) $ 2,414

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019

~~For fiscal year 2017, the~~The Company recognized net income of ~~$84.1~~$64.5 million, or ~~$0.63~~$0.47 per share, for the year ended September 30, 2020 compared to net income of ~~$83.5~~$94.2 million, or ~~$0.63~~$0.68 per share, for ~~fiscal~~the year ~~2016.~~ended September 30, 2019. The ~~increase~~decrease in net income was due primarily to a ~~$3.2~~$21.6 million increase in provision for credit losses and a $17.1 million decrease in net interest income, partially offset by a ~~$1.1 million~~ decrease in ~~non-interest income. Partially offsetting this increase, no provision~~income tax expense.

the current year. The net interest margin ~~increased four~~decreased 14 basis points, from ~~1.75%~~2.26% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year to ~~1.79%~~2.12% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year. The leverage strategy was suspended at certain times during the prior year and during all of the current year due to the negative interest rate spreads between the related FHLB borrowings and cash held at the FRB of Kansas City, making the transaction unprofitable. When the leverage strategy is in place, it increases our net interest income but reduces the net interest margin due to the amount of earnings from the transaction in comparison to the size of the transaction. Excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, the net interest margin would have ~~increased five~~decreased 18 basis points, from ~~2.10%~~2.30% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year to ~~2.15%~~2.12% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year. The ~~increase~~decrease in the net interest margin, excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, was due mainly to a ~~shift in the mix of interest-earning assets from relatively lower yielding securities to higher yielding loans, partially offset by a~~ decrease in the ~~weighted average~~loan portfolio yield, specifically the yield on ~~loans.~~ the correspondent one- to four-family loan portfolio.

The ~~positive impact~~leverage strategy involves borrowing up to $2.10 billion either on the Bank's FHLB line of credit or by entering into short-term FHLB advances, depending on the rates offered by FHLB. The borrowings are repaid at quarter end, or earlier if the strategy is suspended. The proceeds from the borrowings, net of the ~~decrease in~~required FHLB stock holdings, are deposited at the FRB of Kansas City. Net income attributable to the leverage strategy is largely derived from the dividends received on FHLB stock holdings, plus the net interest ~~expense~~rate spread between the yield on the cash at the FRB of Kansas City and the rate paid on the related FHLB borrowings, ~~not related~~less applicable federal insurance premiums and estimated taxes. Net income attributable to the leverage strategy was ~~offset by an increase~~$14 thousand during the prior year. The leverage strategy was not in place during the current year. Management continues to monitor the net interest ~~expense on deposits.~~rate spread and overall profitability of the strategy. It is expected that the strategy will be reimplemented if it reaches a position that is profitable.

Interest and Dividend Income

The weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets ~~increased 13~~decreased 21 basis points, from ~~2.74%~~3.61% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year to ~~2.87%~~3.40% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year, ~~while~~and the average balance of interest-earning assets decreased ~~$100.0 million from the prior fiscal year.~~$193.4 million. Absent the impact of the leverage strategy, the weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets would have ~~increased six~~decreased 22 basis points, from ~~3.21%~~3.62% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year to ~~3.27%~~3.40% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year, ~~while~~and the average balance of interest-earning assets would have decreased ~~$59.6~~$35.6 million. The decrease in the weighted average yield between periods was due primarily to a decrease in the loan portfolio yield. The following table presents the components of interest and dividend income for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.


	For the Year Ended
	September 30,				Change Expressed in:
	2020		2019		Dollars		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans receivable	$	270,494	$	284,229	$	(13,735)	(4.8)	%
MBS	23,009		25,730		(2,721)		(10.6)
FHLB stock	5,827		7,823		(1,996)		(25.5)
Investment securities	4,467		6,366		(1,899)		(29.8)
Cash and cash equivalents	1,181		5,806		(4,625)		(79.7)
Total interest and dividend income	$	304,978	$	329,954	$	(24,976)	(7.6)

For the Year Ended
September 30, Change Expressed in:
2017
2016
Dollars Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans receivable $ 253,393
$ 243,311
$ 10,082
4.1 %
MBS 23,809
29,794
(5,985 ) (20.1 )
Cash and cash equivalents 19,389
9,831
9,558
97.2
FHLB Stock 12,233
12,252
(19 ) (0.2 )
Investment securities 4,362
5,925
(1,563 ) (26.4 )
Total interest and dividend income $ 313,186
$ 301,113
$ 12,073
4.0

The ~~increase~~decrease in interest income on loans receivable was due mainly to a ~~$384.4 million increase in the average balance of the portfolio, partially offset by a six basis point~~ decrease in ~~the weighted average~~ yield on the portfolio to 3.54% for the current fiscal year. Loan growth was funded through cash flows from the securities portfolio. The decrease in the weighted average yield was due primarily to endorsements and refinances repricingcorrespondent loans, ~~to lower market rates, the origination and purchase of loans at rates lower than the overall loan portfolio rate at certain points during each year, and an~~including a $5.8 million increase in the amortization of premiums related to ~~correspondent~~increases in payoff and endorsement activity. This was partially offset by a shift in the mix of the loan portfolio, as the average balance of lower-yielding one- to four-family loans decreased $152.2 million, or 2.3%, partially offset by a $64.9 million, or 9.2%, increase in the average balance of higher-yielding commercial loans, excluding PPP loans. The weighted average yield on the loans receivable portfolio decreased 14 basis points, from 3.77% for the prior year to 3.63% for the current year.

The decrease in interest income on the MBS portfolio was due primarily to a ~~$278.1 million~~22 basis point decrease in the average balance of the portfolio as cash flows not reinvested were used primarily to fund loan growth and pay off maturing FHLB borrowings. The weighted average yield on the MBS portfolio increased one basis point, from 2.18% during the prior fiscal year to 2.19% for the current fiscal year. Net premium amortization of $4.2 million during the current fiscal year decreased the weighted average yield to 2.41% in the current year as a result of new purchases at lower market yields and the repricing of existing adjustable-rate MBS to lower market yields. The decrease in dividend income on FHLB stock was due mainly to a decrease in the ~~portfolio~~dividend rate paid by 39FHLB, as well as to the leverage strategy not being in place during the current year. The decrease in interest income on investment securities was due mainly to a 61 basis ~~points. During the prior fiscal year, $5.0 million of net premiums were amortized, which decreased~~point decrease in the weighted average yield onto 1.65% in the ~~portfolio by 37 basis points. As~~current year as a result of ~~September 30, 2017, the remaining net balance of premiums on our portfolio of MBS was $9.0 million.~~

calls and maturities either being replaced at lower market rates or not being replaced. The ~~increase~~decrease in interest income on cash and cash equivalents was due primarily to the leverage strategy being in place for a ~~45 basis point increase~~portion of the prior year and not being in place during the ~~weighted average yield resulting from an increase~~current year, along with a decrease in the yield earned on ~~balances~~cash held at the FRB of Kansas City.

The decrease in interest income on investment securities was due to a $140.1 million decrease in the average balance. Cash flows not reinvested in the portfolio were used primarily to fund loan growth and pay off maturing FHLB borrowings.

Interest Expense

The weighted average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities ~~increased 10~~decreased eight basis points, from ~~1.11%~~1.54% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year to ~~1.21%~~1.46% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year, ~~while~~and the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities decreased ~~$76.2 million from the prior year fiscal year.~~$126.0 million. Absent the impact of the leverage strategy, the weighted average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities would have ~~increased one~~decreased six basis ~~point,~~points, from ~~1.28%~~1.52% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year to ~~1.29%~~1.46% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year, while the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities would have ~~decreased $35.8~~increased $31.8 million. The following table presents the components of interest expense for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.


	For the Year Ended
	September 30,				Change Expressed in:
	2020		2019		Dollars		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	$	67,598	$	66,201	$	1,397	2.1	%
Borrowings	48,045		57,363		(9,318)		(16.2)
Total interest expense	$	115,643	$	123,564	$	(7,921)	(6.4)

For the Year Ended
September 30, Change Expressed in:
2017
2016
Dollars Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST EXPENSE:
FHLB borrowings $ 68,871
$ 65,091
$ 3,780
5.8 %
Deposits 42,968
37,859
5,109
13.5
Repurchase agreements 5,965
5,981
(16 ) (0.3 )
Total interest expense $ 117,804
$ 108,931
$ 8,873
8.1

The increase in interest expense on deposits was due to an increase in the cost of the retail/business certificate of deposit portfolio, partially offset by decreases in the cost of wholesale certificates of deposit and money market accounts. The weighted average rate of the retail/business certificate of deposit portfolio increased 11 basis points, to 2.03% for the current year, and the average balance increased $185.0 million, or approximately 7%. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Bank increased offered rates on short-term and certain intermediate-term certificates of deposit in an effort to encourage customers to move funds to those terms. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Bank held the unTraditional campaign with above-market rates, resulting in growth in the short-term and certain intermediate-term certificates of deposit. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the retail/business certificate of deposit portfolio has been gradually repricing down as certificates renew to lower offered rates.

The borrowings line item in the table above includes interest expense ~~on FHLB borrowings both~~ associated and not associated with the leverage strategy. Interest expense on ~~FHLB~~ borrowings not related to the leverage strategy decreased ~~$4.6~~$5.4 million from the prior ~~fiscal~~ year due primarily to a ~~$221.0 million~~ decrease in the average balance of such borrowings, as certain maturing FHLB advances and repurchase agreements were not replaced and the ~~portfolio as a result~~Bank paid down its FHLB line of ~~not replacing all of the advances that matured between periods. Funds~~credit with funds generated from ~~deposit growth were primarily used to pay off~~ the maturing advances, along with some cash flows from the securities portfolio. The weighted average rate paid on FHLB borrowings not related to the leverage strategy increased one basis point, to 2.24% for the current fiscal year.increase in deposits. Interest expense on FHLB borrowings associated with the leverage strategy ~~increased $8.4~~decreased $3.9 million from the prior ~~fiscal~~ year due to the leverage strategy being in place for a ~~43 basis point increase in the weighted average rate paid as a result of an increase in interest rates between periods.~~

The increase in interest expense on deposits was due primarily to a seven basis point increase in the weighted average rate, to 0.82% for the current fiscal year, along with growth in the portfolio. The increase in the weighted average rate was primarily related to the retail certificate of deposit portfolio, which increased 10 basis points to 1.46% for the current fiscal year. The average balanceportion of the ~~deposit portfolio increased $185.2 million~~prior year and not being in place at all during the current ~~fiscal year, with the majority of the increase in retail deposits.~~year.

Provision for Credit Losses

The Bank ~~did not record~~recorded a provision for credit losses during the current ~~fiscal~~ year of $22.3 million, compared to ~~a negative provision for credit losses of~~ $750 thousand during the prior ~~fiscal~~ year. ~~Based on management's assessment of the ACL formula analysis model and several other factors, it was determined that no~~The $22.3 million provision for credit losses ~~was necessary for~~in the current ~~fiscal year. Net loan charge-offs were $142 thousand during~~year was primarily related to the ~~current fiscal year compared to $153 thousand in~~deterioration of economic conditions as a result of COVID-19. See "Part I, Item 1. Business – Asset Quality – Allowance for credit losses and Provision for credit losses" for additional discussion regarding management's evaluation of the ~~prior fiscal year. At~~adequacy of the Bank's ACL at September 30, ~~2017, loans 30 to 89 days delinquent were 0.26% of total loans and loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure were 0.13% of total loans.~~2020.

Non-Interest Income

The following table presents the components of non-interest income for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.


	For the Year Ended
	September 30,				Change Expressed in:
	2020		2019		Dollars		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Deposit service fees	$	11,285	$	12,740	$	(1,455)	(11.4)	%
Insurance commissions	2,487		2,821		(334)		(11.8)
Other non-interest income	5,827		6,397		(570)		(8.9)
Total non-interest income	$	19,599	$	21,958	$	(2,359)	(10.7)

For the Year Ended
September 30, Change Expressed in:
2017
2016
Dollars Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Retail fees and charges $ 15,053
$ 14,835
$ 218
1.5 %
Income from bank-owned life insurance ("BOLI") 2,233
3,420
(1,187 ) (34.7 )
Other non-interest income 4,910
5,057
(147 ) (2.9 )
Total non-interest income $ 22,196
$ 23,312
$ (1,116 ) (4.8 )

The decrease in ~~income from BOLI~~deposit service fees was due mainly to a decrease in service charge income, primarily resulting from a decrease in consumer activity related to the ~~receipt~~COVID-19 pandemic, along with the discontinuation of point-of-sale service charges, which the Bank ceased charging in April 2019. The decrease in insurance commissions was due primarily to a ~~death benefit during~~decrease in the amount of annual contingent insurance commissions. The decrease in other non-interest income was due mainly to a decrease in loan-related fees, primarily prepayment fees and late charges, compared to the prior ~~fiscal year with no such death benefit in the current fiscal~~ year.

Non-Interest Expense

The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.


	For the Year Ended
	September 30,				Change Expressed in:
	2020		2019		Dollars		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	52,996	$	53,145	$	(149)	(0.3)	%
Information technology and related expense	16,974		17,615		(641)		(3.6)
Occupancy, net	13,870		13,032		838		6.4
Regulatory and outside services	5,762		5,813		(51)		(0.9)
Advertising and promotional	4,889		5,244		(355)		(6.8)
Deposit and loan transaction costs	2,890		2,478		412		16.6
Office supplies and related expense	2,195		2,439		(244)		(10.0)
Federal insurance premium	914		1,172		(258)		(22.0)

Other non-interest expense	5,514		6,006		(492)		(8.2)
Total non-interest expense	$	106,004	$	106,944	$	(940)	(0.9)

For the Year Ended
September 30, Change Expressed in:
2017
2016
Dollars Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits $ 43,437
$ 42,378
$ 1,059
2.5 %
Information technology and communications 11,282
10,540
742
7.0
Occupancy, net 10,814
10,576
238
2.3
Regulatory and outside services 5,821
5,645
176
3.1
Deposit and loan transaction costs 5,284
5,585
(301 ) (5.4 )
Advertising and promotional 4,673
4,609
64
1.4
Federal insurance premium 3,539
5,076
(1,537 ) (30.3 )
Office supplies and related expense 1,981
2,640
(659 ) (25.0 )
Low income housing partnerships —
3,872
(3,872 ) (100.0 )
Other non-interest expense 2,827
3,384
(557 ) (16.5 )
Total non-interest expense $ 89,658
$ 94,305
$ (4,647 ) (4.9 )

The decrease in information technology and related expense was due mainly to the prior year including costs related to the integration of the operations of CCB. The increase in ~~salaries and employee benefits~~occupancy, net was due primarily to an increase in ~~employee health care costs.~~facility-related costs resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, along with an increase in depreciation expense. The decrease in advertising and promotional expenses was due mainly to adjustments in advertising schedules, postponements of campaigns, and cancellations of certain sponsorships as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in ~~information technology~~deposit and ~~communications~~loan transaction costs was due ~~largely~~mainly to ~~software licensing expenses, website hosting expenses, and communication network expenses.~~the timing of loan origination-related costs. The decrease in the federal insurance ~~premiums~~premium was due ~~primarily~~mainly to ~~a decrease in~~the Bank utilizing an assessment credit from the FDIC ~~base assessment rate effective July 1, 2016. The decrease in office supplies and related expense was due primarily to lower debit card expenses compared to~~during the prior fiscal year, during which time the Bank began issuing debit cards enabled with chip card technology. The decrease in low income housing partnerships expense was due to a change in the Bank's method of accounting for those investments. The Bank had been accounting for these partnerships using the equity method of accounting as twomajority of the Bank's officers were involved in the operational management of the low income housing partnership investment group. Effective September 30, 2016, those two Bank officers discontinued their involvement in the operational management of the investment group. On October 1, 2016, the Bank began using the proportional method of accounting for those investments rather than the equity method. As a result, the Bank no longer reports low income housing partnership expenses in non-interest expense; rather, the pretax operating losses and related tax benefits from the investments

~~are reported as a component of income tax expense.~~current year. The decrease in other non-interest expense was due ~~mainly~~primarily to a decrease in ~~OREO operations expense, along with lower~~amortization of deposit ~~account charge-offs related to~~intangibles, as well as a decrease in debit card fraud ~~in the current fiscal year.~~losses.

The Company's efficiency ratio was ~~41.21%~~50.74% for the current ~~fiscal~~ year compared to ~~43.76%~~46.83% for the prior ~~fiscal~~ year. The ~~improvement~~change in the efficiency ratio was due ~~primarily~~ to lower ~~non-interest expense~~net interest income in the current year compared to the prior ~~year period.~~year. The efficiency ratio is a measure of a financial institution's total non-interest expense as a percentage of the sum of net interest income (pre-provision for credit losses) and non-interest income. A ~~lower~~higher value indicates that the financial institution is generating revenue with a proportionally ~~lower~~higher level of ~~expense.~~expense, relative to the net interest margin.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $43.8 million for the current fiscal year compared to $38.4 million for the prior year fiscal year. The effective tax rate for the current fiscal year was 34.2% compared to 31.5% for the prior year fiscal year. The increase in effective tax rate was due mainly to the change in accounting method for low income housing partnerships as previously discussed. Management anticipates the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2018 will be approximately 34%. Congress is considering legislation that would reduce the effective corporate tax rate. No prediction can be made as to whether or when any such legislation may be enacted or the estimated impact on the Company.

~~Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015~~

For fiscal year 2016, the Company recognized net income of $83.5 million, or $0.63 per share, compared to net income of $78.1 million, or $0.58 per share, for fiscal year 2015. The $5.4 million, or 6.9%, increase in net income was due primarily to a $2.4 million increase in net interest income and a $2.2 million increase in non-interest income. The $2.4 million, or 1.3%, increase in net interest income from fiscal year 2015 was due primarily to an $8.2 million decrease in interest expense on term borrowings, partially offset by a $4.7 million increase in interest expense on deposits.

Net income attributable to the leverage strategy was $2.3 million during fiscal year 2016, compared to $2.8 million for fiscal year 2015. The decrease was due to the average borrowings rate on the FHLB line of credit increasing more than the average yield earned on the cash balances held at the Federal Reserve Bank.

The net interest margin increased two basis points, from 1.73% for fiscal year 2015 to 1.75% for fiscal year 2016. Excluding the effects of the leverage strategy, the net interest margin would have increased three basis points, from 2.07% for fiscal year 2015 to 2.10% for fiscal year 2016. The increase in the net interest margin was due mainly to a decrease in interest expense on term borrowings, partially offset by an increase in interest expense on deposits. The positive impact on the net interest margin resulting from the shift in the mix of interest-earning assets from relatively lower yielding securities to higher yielding loans was offset by a decrease in the loan portfolio yield.

The Company's efficiency ratio was 43.76% for fiscal year 2016 compared to 44.74% for fiscal year 2015. The change in the efficiency ratio was due primarily to an increase in both net interest income and non-interest income.

~~Interest and Dividend Income~~

The weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets increased three basis points, from 2.71% for fiscal year 2015 to 2.74% for fiscal year 2016, and the average balance of interest-earning assets increased $25.4 million from fiscal year 2015. Absent the impact of the leverage strategy, the weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets would have decreased one basis point, from 3.22% for fiscal year 2015 to 3.21% for fiscal year 2016, while the average balance would have increased $40.5 million. The following table presents ~~the components of interest~~pretax income, income tax expense, and ~~dividend~~net income for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.


	For the Year Ended
	September 30,						Change Expressed in:
	2020			2019			Dollars		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Income before income tax expense	$	80,630		$	120,654		$	(40,024)	(33.2)	%
Income tax expense	16,090			26,411			(10,321)		(39.1)
Net income	$	64,540		$	94,243		$	(29,703)	(31.5)

Effective Tax Rate	20.0		%	21.9		%

For the Year Ended
September 30, Change Expressed in:
2016
2015
Dollars Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans receivable $ 243,311
$ 235,500
$ 7,811
3.3 %
MBS 29,794
36,647
(6,853 ) (18.7 )
FHLB stock 12,252
12,556
(304 ) (2.4 )
Cash and cash equivalents 9,831
5,477
4,354
79.5
Investment securities 5,925
7,182
(1,257 ) (17.5 )
Total interest and dividend income $ 301,113
$ 297,362
$ 3,751
1.3

The increase in interest income on loans receivable was due to a $376.4 million increase in the average balance of the portfolio, partially offset by a nine basis point decrease in the weighted average yield on the portfolio, to 3.60% for fiscal year 2016. Loan growth was primarily funded through cash flows from the MBS and investment securities portfolios. The decrease in the weighted average yield was due primarily to loans repricing to lower market rates and the origination and purchase of loans between periods at rates less than the existing portfolio rate, along with an increase in the amortization of premiums paid for correspondent loans.

The decrease in ~~interest~~ income on the MBS portfolio was due primarily to a $265.5 million decrease in the average balance of the portfolio as cash flows not reinvested were used to fund loan growth. Additionally, the weighted average yield on the MBS portfolio decreased seven basis points, from 2.25% during fiscal year 2015 to 2.18% for fiscal year 2016. The decrease in the weighted average yield was due primarily to an increase in the impact of net premium amortization. Net premium amortization of $5.0 million during fiscal year 2016 decreased the weighted average yield on the portfolio by 37 basis points. During fiscal year 2015, $5.4 million of net premiums were amortized, which decreased the weighted average yield on the portfolio by 32 basis points. As of September 30, 2016, the remaining net balance of premiums on our portfolio of MBS was $13.0 million.

The increase in interest income on cash and cash equivalents was due primarily to a 20 basis point increase in the weighted average yield resulting from an increase in the yield earned on balances held at the Federal Reserve Bank.

The decrease in interest income on investment securities was due primarily to a $123.8 million decrease in the average balance, partially offset by a four basis point increase in the weighted average yield on the portfolio. Cash flows not reinvested in the portfolio were used to fund loan growth.

~~Interest Expense~~

The weighted average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities decreased one basis point, from 1.12% for fiscal year 2015 to 1.11% for fiscal year 2016, while the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $138.5 million from fiscal year 2015. Absent the impact of the leverage strategy, the weighted average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities would have decreased seven basis points from fiscal year 2015, to 1.28% for fiscal year 2016, due primarily to a decrease in the cost of term borrowings, while the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities would have increased $154.1 million due primarily to growth in deposits. The following table presents the components of interest expense for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.

For the Year Ended
September 30, Change Expressed in:
2016
2015
Dollars Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST EXPENSE:
FHLB borrowings $ 65,091
$ 67,797
$ (2,706 ) (4.0 )%
Deposits 37,859
33,119
4,740
14.3
Repurchase agreements 5,981
6,678
(697 ) (10.4 )
Total interest expense $ 108,931
$ 107,594
$ 1,337
1.2

The table above includes interest expense on FHLB borrowings both associated and not associated with the leverage strategy. Interest expense on FHLB borrowings not related to the leverage strategy decreased $7.5 million from fiscal year 2015 due mainly to a 20 basis point decrease in the weighted average rate paid on the portfolio, to 2.23% for fiscal year 2016, along with a $102.4 million decrease in the average balance due to not replacing all of the FHLB advances that matured during fiscal year 2016 as a result of growth in the deposit portfolio. The decrease in the weighted average rate paid was due primarily to the prepayment of a $175.0 million advance late in fiscal year 2015 with an effective rate of 5.08%, which was replaced with a $175.0 million advance with an effective rate of 2.18%. Interest expense on FHLB borrowings associated with the leverage strategy increased $4.8 million from fiscal year 2015 due primarily to a 23 basis point increase in the weighted average rate paid on the borrowings.

The increase in interest expense on deposits was due primarily to a five basis point increase in the weighted average rate, to 0.75% for fiscal year 2016, along with growth in the portfolio. The increase in weighted average rate was primarily in the retail certificate of deposit portfolio. The average balance of the deposit portfolio increased $270.3 million for fiscal year 2016, with the majority of the increase in the retail deposit portfolio, specifically the certificate of deposit and checking portfolios. The decrease in interest expense on repurchase agreements was due to the maturity late in fiscal year 2015 of a $20.0 million repurchase agreement at a rate of 4.45% that was not replaced.

~~Provision for Credit Losses~~

The Bank recorded a negative provision for credit losses during fiscal year 2016 of $750 thousand, compared to a provision for credit losses during the prior year fiscal year of $771 thousand. The negative provision for credit losses during fiscal year 2016 was due to the continued low level of net loan charge-offs, due partially to improving real estate values, along with improving delinquent loan ratios. The collateral value and historical loss factors within our ACL formula analysis model decreased during fiscal year 2016 due to the improvement in real estate values and reduction in net loan charge-offs. Net loan charge-offs were $153 thousand for fiscal year 2016, composed of charge-offs totaling $630 thousand, partially offset by recoveries of $477 thousand. Net loan charge-offs were $555 thousand for fiscal year 2015. At September 30, 2016, loans 30 to 89 days delinquent were 0.33% of total loans and loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure were 0.24% of total loans. At September 30, 2015, loans 30 to 89 days delinquent were 0.41% of total loans and loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure were 0.25% of total loans.

~~Non-Interest Income~~

~~The following table presents the components of non-interest income for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.~~

For the Year Ended
September 30, Change Expressed in:
2016
2015
Dollars Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Retail fees and charges $ 14,835
$ 14,897
$ (62 ) (0.4 )%
Income from BOLI 3,420
1,150
2,270
197.4
Other non-interest income 5,057
5,093
(36 ) (0.7 )
Total non-interest income $ 23,312
$ 21,140
$ 2,172
10.3

The increase in income from BOLI was due mainly to the purchase of a new BOLI investment late in fiscal year 2015, as well as to the receipt of death benefits in fiscal year 2016 and no such proceeds in fiscal year 2015.

~~Non-Interest Expense~~

~~The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.~~

For the Year Ended
September 30, Change Expressed in:
2016
2015
Dollars Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits $ 42,378
$ 43,309
$ (931 ) (2.1 )%
Occupancy, net 10,576
9,944
632
6.4
Information technology and communications 10,540
10,360
180
1.7
Federal insurance premium 5,076
5,495
(419 ) (7.6 )
Deposit and loan transaction costs 5,585
5,417
168
3.1
Regulatory and outside services 5,645
5,347
298
5.6
Advertising and promotional 4,609
4,547
62
1.4
Low income housing partnerships 3,872
4,572
(700 ) (15.3 )
Office supplies and related expense 2,640
2,088
552
26.4
Other non-interest expense 3,384
3,290
94
2.9
Total non-interest expense $ 94,305
$ 94,369
$ (64 ) (0.1 )

The decrease in salaries and employee benefits was due primarily to a decrease in stock compensation resulting from the final vesting of a large stock grant in the second quarter of fiscal year 2016 and a decrease in employee benefit expenses. The increase in occupancy, net expense was due mainly to non-capitalizable costs and depreciation associated with the remodel of the Bank's Kansas City market area operations center. The decrease in federal insurance premiums was due primarily to a decrease in the FDIC base assessment rate. The decrease in the FDIC base assessment rate was effective July 1, 2016 and was the result of the FDIC DIF reaching 1.15% of total estimated insured deposits of the banking system on June 30, 2016. The decrease in low income housing partnershipstax expense was due primarily to lower ~~impairments~~pretax income in ~~fiscal~~the current year. The lower effective tax rate in the current year ~~2016 as~~ compared to ~~fiscal~~the prior year ~~2015. The increase in office supplies and related expense~~ was due ~~primarily~~mainly to the ~~purchase of cards enabled with chip card technology.~~

~~Income Tax Expense~~

~~Income~~Company's permanent differences, such as low income housing partnership tax credits, which generally reduce our tax expense, having a proportionately larger impact given the lower pretax income in the current year period. Additionally, an income tax benefit was ~~$38.4 million for fiscal~~recognized during the current year ~~2016 compared~~as a result of favorable federal tax guidance issued during the current year related to ~~$37.7 million for fiscal year 2015. The~~certain bank-owned life insurance policies added in the CCB acquisition. Management anticipates the effective income tax rate for fiscal year ~~2016 was 31.5% compared~~2021 will be approximately 21% to ~~32.5%~~22%.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

For this discussion, see "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ~~2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due primarily to an increase in nontaxable income related to BOLI and higher low income housing tax credits in fiscal year 2016.~~ended September 30, 2019.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity refers to our ability to generate sufficient cash to fund ongoing operations, to repay maturing certificates of deposit and other deposit withdrawals, to repay maturing borrowings, and to fund loan commitments. Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of our business management. The Company's most available liquid assets are represented by cash and cash equivalents, AFS securities, and short-term investment securities. The Bank's primary sources of funds are deposits, FHLB borrowings, repurchase agreements, repayments and maturities of outstanding loans and MBS and other short-term investments, and funds provided by operations. The Bank's long-term borrowings primarily have been used to manage the Bank's interest rate risk with the ~~intent~~intention to improve the earnings of the Bank while maintaining capital ratios in excess of regulatory standards for well-capitalized financial institutions. In addition, the Bank's focus on managing risk has provided additional liquidity capacity by maintaining a balance of MBS and investment securities available as collateral for borrowings.

We generally intend to manage cash reserves sufficient to meet short-term liquidity needs, which are routinely forecasted for 10, 30, and 365 days. Additionally, on a monthly basis, we perform a liquidity stress test in accordance with the Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management. The liquidity stress test incorporates both short-term and long-term liquidity scenarios in order to identify and to quantify liquidity risk. Management also monitors key liquidity statistics related to items such as wholesale funding gaps, borrowings capacity, and available unpledged collateral, as well as various liquidity ratios. See the "Executive Summary" above for information regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our liquidity.

In the event short-term liquidity needs exceed available cash, the Bank has access to a line of credit at FHLB and the FRB of Kansas City's discount window. ~~Per FHLB's lending guidelines, total FHLB borrowings cannot exceed 40%~~See "Part I, Item 1. Business - Sources of ~~regulatory total assets without the pre-approval of FHLB senior management. In July 2017, the president of FHLB approved an increase, through July 2018, in~~Funds" for information regarding limits on the Bank's ~~borrowing limit to 55% of Bank Call Report total assets. When the leverage strategy is in place, the Bank maintains the resulting excess cash reserves from the~~ FHLB ~~borrowings at the FRB of Kansas City, which can be used to meet any short-term liquidity needs.~~borrowings. The amount that can be borrowed from the FRB of Kansas City's discount window is based upon the fair value of securities pledged as collateral and certain other characteristics of those ~~securities, and is used only when other sources of short-term liquidity are unavailable.~~securities. Management tests the Bank's access to the FRB of Kansas City's discount window annually with a nominal, overnight borrowing.

If management observes a trend in the amount and frequency of line of credit utilization and/or short-term borrowings that is not in conjunction with a planned strategy, such as the leverage strategy, the Bank will likely utilize long-term wholesale borrowing sources such as FHLB advances and/or repurchase agreements to provide long-term, fixed-rate funding. The maturities of these long-term borrowings are generally staggered in order to mitigate the risk of a highly negative cash flow position at maturity. The Bank's internal policy limits total borrowings to 55% of total assets. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank had total borrowings, at par, of ~~$2.38~~$1.79 billion, or approximately ~~26%~~19% of total ~~assets.~~assets, all of which were FHLB advances.

The amount of FHLB ~~advances~~borrowings outstanding at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 was ~~$2.18~~$1.79 billion, of which ~~$475.0~~$843.0 million ~~was~~were advances scheduled to mature in the next 12 ~~months.~~months, including $640.0 million of one-year floating-rate FHLB advances tied to interest rate swaps. All FHLB borrowings are secured bycertain qualifying loans pursuant to a blanket collateral agreement with FHLB. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the ~~Bank's~~ ratio of the par value of the Bank's FHLB borrowings to Call Report total assets was ~~24%~~19%. When the full leverage strategy is in place, FHLB borrowings are in excess of 40% of the Bank's Call Report total assets, and are expected to be in excess of 40% as long as the Bank continues its leverage strategy and FHLB senior management continue to approve the Bank's borrowing limit being in excess of 40% of Call Report total assets. All or a portion of the FHLB borrowings in conjunction with the leverage strategy could be repaid at any point in time while the strategy is in effect, if necessary.

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank had no repurchase ~~agreements of $200.0 million, or approximately 2% of total assets, of which $100.0 million was scheduled to mature in the next 12 months.~~agreements. The Bank may enter into ~~additional~~ repurchase agreements as management deems appropriate, not to exceed 15% of total assets, and subject to the total borrowings internal policy limit of 55% as discussed above. The Bank had pledged securities with an estimated fair value of $218.5 million as collateral for repurchase agreements as of September 30, 2017. The securities pledged for the repurchase agreements will be delivered back to the Bank when the repurchase agreements mature.

The Bank could utilize the repayment and maturity of outstanding loans, MBS, and other investments for liquidity needs rather than reinvesting such funds into the related portfolios. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank had ~~$430.7 million~~$1.22 billion of securities that were eligible but unused as collateral for borrowing or other liquidity needs.

The Bank has access to other sources of funds for liquidity purposes, such as brokered and public unit ~~deposits.~~certificates of deposit. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank's policy allowed for combined brokered and public unit ~~deposits~~certificates of deposit up to 15% of total deposits. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank ~~had~~did not have any brokered certificates of deposit and public unit ~~deposits totaling $460.0 million, which had an average remaining term to maturity~~certificates of ~~10 months, or~~deposit were approximately 9%4% of total ~~deposits, and no brokered~~ deposits. ~~Management continuously monitors the wholesale deposit market for opportunities to obtain funds at attractive rates.~~ The Bank had pledged securities with an estimated fair value of ~~$500.7~~$331.0 million as collateral for public unit ~~deposits~~certificates of deposit at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. The securities pledged as collateral for public unit ~~deposits~~certificates of deposit are held under joint custody with FHLB and generally will be released upon deposit maturity.

At September 30, ~~2017, $1.12~~2020, $1.51 billion of the Bank's certificate of deposit portfolio was scheduled to mature within ~~one year,~~the next 12 months, including ~~$288.5~~$237.5 million of public unit ~~deposits.~~certificates of deposit. Based on our deposit retention experience and our current pricing strategy, we anticipate the majority of the maturing retail certificates of deposit will renew or transfer to other deposit products of the Bank at ~~the~~ prevailing ~~rate,~~rates, although no assurance can be given in this regard. We also anticipate the majority of the maturing public unit ~~deposits~~certificates of deposit will be replaced with similar wholesale funding ~~products.~~products, depending on availability and pricing.

While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans and MBS and payments on short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows, prepayments on loans and MBS, and calls of investment securities are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition, and are less predictable sources of funds. To the extent possible, the Bank manages the cash flows of its loan and deposit portfolios by the rates it offers customers.

The following table presents the contractual maturities of our loan, MBS, and investment securities portfolios at September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, along with associated weighted average yields. Loans and securities which have adjustable interest rates are shown as maturing in the period during which the contract is due. The table does not reflect the effects of possible prepayments or enforcement of due on sale clauses. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the amortized cost of investment securities in our portfolio which are callable or have pre-refunding dates within one year was ~~$126.6~~$228.0 million.


	Loans(1)				MBS				Investment Securities				Total
	Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Amounts due:
Within one year	$	261,605	4.17	%	$	3,664	2.63	%	$	4,009	1.47	%	$	269,278	4.11	%

After one year:
Over one to two years	110,991		3.11		1,715		3.08		5,583		1.84		118,289		3.05
Over two to three years	62,534		4.46		32,457		1.61		75,269		0.41		170,260		2.13
Over three to five years	128,088		4.46		24,752		2.19		295,286		0.68		448,126		1.84
Over five to ten years	777,216		3.70		272,681		2.34		—		—		1,049,897		3.35
Over ten to fifteen years	1,424,450		3.23		570,142		1.70		—		—		1,994,592		2.79
After fifteen years	4,460,112		3.59		275,392		2.06		—		—		4,735,504		3.50
Total due after one year	6,963,391		3.54		1,177,139		1.94		376,138		0.64		8,516,668		3.19

	$	7,224,996	3.57		$	1,180,803	1.94		$	380,147	0.65		$	8,785,946	3.22

(1)The maturity date for home equity loans, including those that do not have a stated maturity date, assumes the customer always makes the required minimum payment. All other loans that do not have a stated maturity date and overdraft loans are included in the amounts due within one year. Construction loans are presented based on the estimated term to complete construction.

Loans⁽¹⁾
MBS Investment Securities Total
Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield
(Dollars in thousands)
Amounts due:
Within one year $ 58,591
3.71 % $ 2,884
3.92 % $ 127,394
1.18 % $ 188,869
2.01 %

After one year:
Over one to two years 82,750
4.04
6,156
4.29
54,123
1.24
143,029
2.99
Over two to three years 14,348
4.10
3,168
4.69
57,196
1.52
74,712
2.15
Over three to five years 40,267
4.25
49,444
2.85
60,140
1.50
149,851
2.68
Over five to ten years 560,361
3.73
447,420
2.07
218
2.00
1,007,999
2.99
Over ten to fifteen years 1,385,085
3.28
124,498
1.83
—
—
1,509,583
3.16
After fifteen years 5,041,349
3.64
308,877
2.59
2,051
2.58
5,352,277
3.58
Total due after one year 7,124,160
3.59
939,563
2.27
173,728
1.44
8,237,451
3.39

$ 7,182,751
3.59
$ 942,447
2.28
$ 301,122
1.33
$ 8,426,320
3.36


~~(1)~~	Demand loans, loans having no stated maturity, and overdraft loans are included in the amounts due within one year. Construction loans are presented based on the estimated term to complete construction. The maturity date for home equity loans assumes the customer always makes the required minimum payment.

Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions

OCC regulations impose restrictions on savings institutions with respect to their ability to make distributions of capital, which include dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers and other transactions charged to the capital account. Under FRB and OCC safe harbor regulations, savings institutions generally may make capital distributions during any calendar year equal to earnings of the previous two calendar years and current year-to-date earnings. Savings institutions must also maintain an applicable capital conservation buffer above minimum risk-based capital requirements in order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions, including dividends. A savings institution that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, such as the Company, that proposes to make a capital distribution must submit written notice to the OCC and FRB 30 days prior to such distribution. The OCC and FRB may object to the distribution during that 30-day period based on safety and soundness or other concerns. Savings institutions that desire to make a larger capital distribution, are under special restrictions, or are not, or would not be, sufficiently capitalized following a proposed capital distribution must obtain regulatory non-objection prior to making such a distribution.

The long-term ability of the Company to pay dividends to its stockholders is based primarily upon the ability of the Bank to make capital distributions to the Company. So long as the Bank remains well capitalized after each capital distribution (as evidenced by maintaining a CBLR greater than the required percentage), and operates in a safe and sound manner, ~~and maintains an applicable capital conservation buffer above its minimum risk-based capital requirements,~~ it is management's belief that the OCC and FRB will continue to allow the Bank to distribute its earnings to the Company, although no assurance can be given in this regard.

Capital

Consistent with our goal to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, we actively seek to maintain a well-capitalized status for the Bank per the regulatory framework for prompt corrective ~~action.~~action ("PCA"). Qualifying institutions that elect to use the CBLR framework, such as the Bank and the Company, that maintain a the required minimum leverage ratio will be considered to have satisfied the generally applicable risk-based and leverage capital requirements in the regulatory agencies' capital rules, and to have met the capital requirements for the well capitalized category under the agencies' PCA framework. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the ~~Bank~~Bank's CBLR was 12.4% and ~~Company~~the Company's CBLR was 13.7%, which exceeded ~~all regulatory capital~~the minimum requirements. See "Part ~~II,~~I, Item ~~8. Financial Statements~~1. Business – Regulation and ~~Supplementary Data~~Supervision – ~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 12.~~ Regulatory Capital Requirements" for additional information related to regulatory capital.

The following table presents a reconciliation of equity under GAAP to regulatory capital amounts, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, for the Bank and the Company (dollars in thousands):


	Bank		Company
Total equity as reported under GAAP	$	1,165,813	$	1,284,859
AOCI	16,505		16,505
Goodwill and other intangibles, net of associated deferred taxes	(13,510)		(13,510)

Total tier 1 capital	$	1,168,808	$	1,287,854

Bank Company
Total equity as reported under GAAP $ 1,204,781
$ 1,368,313
AOCI-related adjustments (2,918 ) (2,918 )
Total tier 1 capital 1,201,863
1,365,395
ACL 8,398
8,398
Total capital $ 1,210,261
$ 1,373,793

~~Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Commitments and Contractual Obligations~~

~~The Company, in the normal course of business, makes commitments to buy or sell assets, extend credit, or to incur or fund liabilities. Such commitments may include, but are not limited to:~~

~~the origination, purchase, participation, or sale of loans;~~

~~the purchase or sale of securities;~~

~~extensions of credit on home equity loans, construction loans, and commercial loans;~~

~~terms and conditions of operating leases; and~~

~~funding withdrawals of deposit accounts at maturity.~~

~~The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other material commitments, along with associated weighted average contractual rates as of September 30, 2017.~~

Maturity Range
Less than 1 to 3 3 to 5 More than
Total 1 year years years 5 years
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating leases $ 6,272
$ 1,170
$ 1,870
$ 1,326
$ 1,906

Certificates of deposit $ 2,910,421
$ 1,116,415
$ 1,340,503
$ 452,113
$ 1,390
Rate 1.48 % 1.08 % 1.67 % 1.93 % 1.98 %

FHLB advances $ 2,175,000
$ 475,000
$ 850,000
$ 750,000
$ 100,000
Rate 1.96 % 1.91 % 1.73 % 2.26 % 1.82 %

Repurchase agreements $ 200,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ —
$ —
Rate 2.94 % 3.35 % 2.53 % — % — %

Commitments to originate and
purchase/participate in loans $ 169,946
$ 169,946
$ —
$ —
$ —
Rate 3.92 % 3.92 % — % — % — %

Commitments to fund unused
home equity lines of credit $ 239,950
$ 239,950
$ —
$ —
$ —
Rate 5.05 % 5.05 % — % — % — %

It is expected that some of the commitments to originate and purchase/participate in loans will expire unfunded; therefore, the amounts reflected in the table above are not necessarily indicative of future liquidity requirements. Additionally, the Bank is not obligated to honor commitments to fund unused home equity lines of credit if a customer is delinquent or otherwise in violation of the loan agreement.

~~We anticipate we will continue to have sufficient funds, through repayments and maturities of loans and securities, deposits and borrowings, to meet our current commitments.~~

Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Company and ~~its subsidiary~~the Bank are named defendants in various lawsuits and counter claims. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, none of the currently pending suits are expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, or future periods.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Commitments and Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations, along with associated weighted average contractual rates, as of September 30, 2020.


				Maturity Range
				Less than			1 to 3			3 to 5			More than
	Total			1 year			years			years			5 years
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating leases	$	20,842		$	1,192		$	2,512		$	1,830		$	15,308

Certificates of deposit	$	3,021,244		$	1,505,501		$	1,199,798		$	315,041		$	904
Rate	1.74		%	1.46		%	2.05		%	1.88		%	1.53		%

Borrowings	$	1,793,000		$	843,000		$	500,000		$	350,000		$	100,000
Rate	1.41		%	0.76		%	1.91		%	2.27		%	1.28		%

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of customers. These financial instruments consist primarily of commitments to originate, purchase, or participate in loans or fund lines of credit, along with standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of an underlying contract with a third party. The credit risks associated with these off-balance-sheet commitments are essentially the same as those involved with extending loans to customers and these commitments are subject to normal credit policies. The contractual amounts of these off-balance sheet financial instruments as of September 30, 2020 were as follows (dollars in thousands):


Commitments to originate and purchase/participate in loans	$	248,607
Commitments to fund unused lines of credit	283,199
Standby letters of credit	1,372
Total	$	533,178

It is expected that some of the commitments will expire unfunded; therefore, the amounts reflected in the table above are not necessarily indicative of future liquidity requirements. Additionally, the Bank is not obligated to honor commitments to fund unused lines of credit if a customer is delinquent or otherwise in violation of the loan agreement.

The Company has investments in several low income housing partnerships. These partnerships supply funds for the construction and operation of apartment complexes that provide affordable housing to that segment of the population with lower family income. If these developments successfully attract a specified percentage of residents falling in that lower income range, federal income tax credits are made available to the partners. The tax credits are normally recognized over ten years, and they play an important part in the anticipated yield from these investments. In order to continue receiving the tax credits each year over the life of the partnership, the low-income residency targets must be maintained. Under the terms of the partnership agreements, the Company has a commitment to fund a specified amount that will be due in installments over the life of the agreements. The majority of the commitments at September 30, 2020 are projected to be funded through the end of calendar year 2022. At September 30, 2020, the investments totaled $89.7 million and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Unfunded commitments, which are recorded as liabilities, totaled $44.5 million at September 30, 2020.

We anticipate we will continue to have sufficient funds, through repayments and maturities of loans and securities, deposits and borrowings, to meet our current commitments.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk

~~Risk associated with changes in interest rates on the earnings of the Bank and the market value of its financial assets and liabilities is known as interest rate risk.~~ The rates of interest the Bank earns on its assets and pays on its liabilities are generally established contractually for a period of time. Fluctuations in interest rates have a significant impact not only upon our net income, but also upon the cash flows and market values of our assets and liabilities. Our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Risk associated with changes in interest rates on the earnings of the Bank and the market value of its financial assets and liabilities is known as interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is our most significant market risk, and our ability to adapt to changes in interest rates is known as interest rate risk management.

On a weekly basis, management reviews deposit flows, loan demand, cash levels, and changes in several market rates to assess all pricing strategies. The Bank's pricing strategy for first mortgage loan products includes setting interest rates based on secondary market prices and competitor pricing for our local and correspondent lending markets. Pricing for commercial loans is generally based on competitor pricing and the credit risk of the borrower with consideration given to the overall relationship of the borrower. Generally, deposit pricing is based upon a survey of competitors in the Bank's market areas, and the need to attract funding and retain maturing deposits. The majority of our loans are fixed-rate products with maturities up to 30 years, while the majority of our retail deposits have stated maturities or repricing dates of less than two years.

The general objective of our interest rate risk management program is to determine and manage an appropriate level of interest rate risk while maximizing net interest income in a manner consistent with our policy to manage, to the extent practicable, the exposure of net interest income to changes in market interest rates. The Board of Directors and ALCO regularly review the Bank's interest rate risk exposure by forecasting the impact of hypothetical, alternative interest rate environments on net interest income and the market value of portfolio equity ("MVPE") at various dates. The MVPE is defined as the net of the present value of cash flows from existing assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments. The present values are determined based upon market conditions as of the date of the analysis, as well as in alternative interest rate environments, providing potential changes in the MVPE under those alternative interest rate environments. Net interest income is projected in the same alternative interest rate environments with both a static balance sheet and management strategies considered. The MVPE and net interest income ~~analysis~~analyses are also conducted to estimate our sensitivity to rates for future time horizons based upon market conditions as of the date of the analysis. In addition to the interest rate environments presented below, management also reviews the impact of non-parallel rate shock scenarios on a quarterly basis. These scenarios consist of flattening and steepening the yield curve by changing short-term and long-term interest rates independent of each other, and simulating cash flows and determining valuations as a result of these hypothetical changes in interest rates to identify rate environments that pose the greatest risk to the Bank. This analysis helps management quantify the Bank's exposure to changes in the shape of the yield curve.

The ability to maximize net interest income is dependent largely upon the achievement of a positive interest rate spread that can be sustained despite fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. The asset and liability repricing gap is a measure of the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities which either reprice or mature within a given period of time. The difference provides an indication of the extent to which an institution's interest rate spread will be affected by changes in interest rates. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest-earning assets exceeds the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing during the same period. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest-bearing liabilities exceeds the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing during the same period. Generally, during a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap within shorter repricing periods adversely affects net interest income, while a positive gap within shorter repricing periods positively affects net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, the opposite would generally be true.

The shape of the yield curve also has an impact on our net interest income and, therefore, the Bank's net interest margin. Historically, the Bank has benefited from a steeper yield curve as the Bank's mortgage loans are generally priced off of long-term rates while deposits are priced off of short-term rates. A steeper yield curve (one with a greater difference between short-term rates and long-term rates) allows the Bank to receive a higher rate of interest on its new mortgage-related assets relative to the rate paid for the funding of those assets, which generally results in a higher net interest margin. As the yield curve flattens or becomes inverted, the spread between rates received on assets and paid on liabilities becomes compressed, which generally leads to a decrease in net interest margin.

General assumptions used by management to evaluate the sensitivity of our financial performance to changes in interest rates presented in the tables below are utilized in, and set forth under, the gap table and related notes. Although management finds these assumptions reasonable, the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities and the estimated effects of changes in interest rates on our net interest income and MVPE indicated in the below tables could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or actual experience differs from these assumptions. To illustrate this point, the projected cumulative excess (deficiency) of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing liabilities within the next 12 months as a percent of total assets ("one-year gap") is also provided for an up 200 basis point scenario, as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank's gap between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities projected to reprice within one year was ~~$641.6~~$435.0 million, or ~~6.98%~~4.58% of total assets, compared to ~~$1.07 billion,~~$487.4 million, or ~~11.54%~~5.22% of total assets, at September 30, ~~2016.~~2019. The decrease in the one-year gap amount ~~from~~was due to a shift in the cash flow projections on the Bank's non-maturity deposits compared to the prior year, related to the implementation of a new interest rate risk model. This change shortened the life of these liabilities and thus increased the amount of projected cash flows in the 12-month horizon compared to the previous model. This change was largely offset by lower interest rates as of September 30, ~~2016~~2020 compared to September 30, ~~2017 was due~~2019, which increased the cash flow projections related to ~~lower projected cash flows on~~the Bank's mortgage-related assets. ~~Market rates of interest increased between September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2017.~~ As interest rates ~~rise,~~fall, borrowers have ~~less~~more economic incentive to refinance their mortgages and agency debt issuers have ~~less~~more economic incentive or opportunity to exercise their call options in order to issue new debt at lower interest ~~rates. This increase~~rates, resulting in ~~interest rates resulted in lower~~higher projected cash flows on these ~~assets over the next year compared to September 30, 2016.~~assets.

The majority of interest-earning assets anticipated to reprice in the coming year are repayments and prepayments on ~~mortgage~~one- to four-family loans and MBS, both of which include the option to prepay without a fee being paid by the contract holder. The amount of interest-bearing liabilities expected to reprice in a given period is not typically impacted significantly by changes in interest rates, because the Bank's borrowings and certificate of deposit portfolios have contractual maturities and generally cannot be terminated early without a prepayment penalty. If interest rates were to increase 200 basis points, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Bank's one-year gap is projected to be ~~$81.3~~$(611.0) million, or ~~0.88%~~(6.44)% of total assets. The decrease in the gap compared to when there is no change in rates is due to lower anticipated cash flows in the higher rate environment. This compares to a one-year gap of ~~$208.7~~$(361.8) million, or ~~2.25%~~(3.87)% of total assets, if interest rates were to have increased 200 basis points as of September 30, ~~2016.~~2019.

During the current fiscal year, loan repayments totaled ~~$1.17~~$1.89 billion and cash flows from the securities portfolio totaled ~~$413.3~~$668.0 million. The ~~asset~~majority of these cash flows ~~of $1.58 billion~~ were reinvested into new ~~assets~~loans and securities at current market interest rates. Total cash flows from ~~fixed-rate~~term liabilities that matured and/or repriced into current market interest rates during the current fiscal year were ~~approximately $2.19~~$2.97 billion, including ~~$500.0~~$1.16 billion in term borrowings, of which $640.0 million ~~of FHLB advances that were renewed.~~was tied to interest rate swaps. These offsetting cash flows allow the Bank to manage its interest rate risk and gap position more precisely than if the Bank did not have offsetting cash flows due to its mix of assets or maturity structure of liabilities.

~~Other strategies include managing the Bank's wholesale assets and liabilities.~~ The Bank primarily uses long-term fixed-rate borrowings with no embedded options to lengthen the average life of the Bank's liabilities. The fixed-rate characteristics of these borrowings lock-in the cost until maturity and thus decrease the amount of liabilities repricing as interest rates move higher compared to funding with lower-cost short-term borrowings. These borrowings are laddered in order to prevent large amounts of liabilities repricing in any one period. The WAL of the Bank's term borrowings as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 was ~~2.3~~1.9 years. However, including the impact of interest rate swaps related to ~~$200.0~~$640.0 million of adjustable-rate FHLB advances, the WAL of the Bank's term borrowings as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 was ~~2.7~~3.0 years. The interest rate swaps effectively convert the adjustable-rate borrowings into long-term, fixed-rate liabilities.

The Bank uses the securities portfolio to shorten the average life of the Bank's assets. Purchases in the securities portfolio over the past couple of years have primarily been focused on callable agency debentures with maturities no longer than five years, shorter duration MBS, and adjustable-rate MBS. These securities have a shorter average life and provide a steady source of cash flow that can be reinvested as interest rates rise or used to purchase higher-yielding assets. The WAL of the Bank's securities portfolio as of September 30, 2017 was 2.5 years.

In addition to ~~the~~these wholesale strategies, the Bank has ~~sought to~~benefited from an increase ~~core~~in non-maturity deposits. Rates paid on non-maturity deposits ~~and long-term certificates of deposit. Core deposits are expected to reduce the risk of higher interest rates because their interest rates~~ are not expected to increase ~~significantly~~ as market interest rates ~~rise and because customers with these accounts tend to be less sensitive to changes in rates, maintaining their accounts for long periods of time.~~rise. Specifically, checking accounts and savings accounts have had minimal interest rate fluctuations throughout historical interest rate cycles, though no assurance can be given that this will be the case in future interest rate cycles. The balances and rates of these accounts have historically tended to remain very stable over time, giving them the characteristic of long-term liabilities. The Bank uses historical data pertaining to these accounts to estimate their future balances. ~~At September 30, 2017~~Additionally, as we expand the ~~WAL~~commercial banking business, we expect to have the ability to obtain lower-costing commercial deposits, which could be used to reduce the cost of funds by replacing FHLB borrowings and wholesale deposits.

With the ~~Bank's non-maturity deposits was 13.5 years, compared to 8.3 years at September 30, 2016. The increase~~significant decrease in ~~the WAL of the Bank's non-maturity deposits was due to a change in the deposit model~~interest rates during the ~~fourth quarter of fiscal~~current year, 2017. The Bank uses a deposit model that was developed from the results of a Bank-specific deposit study. The deposit study analyzed the historical behavior of the Bank's non-maturity deposits to predict the future balances of these accounts. The change was made due to model validation testing which indicated that the model was not predicting deposit behavior as well as management expected. The change resulted in

~~an increase in the WAL of these liabilities, which resulted in our MVPE measure of interest rate risk sensitivity not being materially lower than results with the previous model.~~

~~Over the last couple years,~~ the Bank has ~~priced long-term~~decreased the rates on certificates of deposit ~~more aggressively than short-term certificates of deposit~~and money market accounts on pace with ~~the goal of giving customers incentive~~competitors in its market areas. The Bank will continue to ~~move funds into longer-term certificates of deposit when interest~~adjust rates were lower. The balance of our retail certificates of deposit with terms of 36 months or longer increased $288.6 million, or 20%, since September 30, 2015. Long-term certificates of deposit reduce the amount of liabilities repricing as ~~interest rates rise in a given time period.~~market conditions allow.

Because of the on-balance sheet strategies implemented over the past several years, management believes the Bank is well-positioned to move into a market rate environment where interest rates are higher.

Gap Table. The following gap table summarizes the anticipated maturities or repricing periods of the Bank's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities based on the information and assumptions set forth in the notes below. Cash flow projections for mortgage-related assets are calculated based in part on prepayment assumptions at current and projected interest rates. Prepayment projections are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and assumptions and, therefore, cannot be determined with a high degree of accuracy. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react differently to changes in market interest rates. Assumptions may not reflect how actual yields and costs respond to market interest rate changes. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Certain assets, such as ~~ARM~~adjustable-rate loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the gap table below. A positive gap indicates more cash flows from assets are expected to reprice than cash flows from liabilities and would indicate, in a rising rate environment, that earnings should increase. A negative gap indicates more cash flows from liabilities are expected to reprice than cash flows from assets and would indicate, in a rising rate environment, that earnings should decrease. For additional information regarding the impact of changes in interest rates, see the following Change in Net Interest Income and Change in MVPE discussions and tables.


			More Than		More Than
	Within		One Year to		Three Years		Over
	One Year		Three Years		to Five Years		Five Years		Total
Interest-earning assets:	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans receivable(1)	$	2,180,950	$	2,209,189	$	1,087,823	$	1,745,032	$	7,222,994
Securities(2)	618,869		513,172		178,157		219,407		1,529,605
Other interest-earning assets	172,286		—		—		—		172,286
Total interest-earning assets	2,972,105		2,722,361		1,265,980		1,964,439		8,924,885

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Non-maturity deposits(3)	752,147		379,065		410,930		1,710,488		3,252,630
Certificates of deposit	1,505,599		1,199,700		315,477		468		3,021,244
Borrowings(4)	279,401		702,940		618,134		231,139		1,831,614
Total interest-bearing liabilities	2,537,147		2,281,705		1,344,541		1,942,095		8,105,488

Excess (deficiency) of interest-earning assets over
interest-bearing liabilities	$	434,958	$	440,656	$	(78,561)	$	22,344	$	819,397

Cumulative excess of interest-earning assets over
interest-bearing liabilities	$	434,958	$	875,614	$	797,053	$	819,397

More Than More Than
Within One Year to Three Years Over
One Year Three Years to Five Years Five Years Total
Interest-earning assets: (Dollars in thousands)
Loans receivable⁽¹⁾
$ 1,800,294
$ 1,883,720
$ 1,110,248
$ 2,379,102
$ 7,173,364
Securities⁽²⁾
576,389
379,421
174,270
108,199
1,238,279
Other interest-earning assets 334,985
—
—
—
334,985
Total interest-earning assets 2,711,668
2,263,141
1,284,518
2,487,301
8,746,628

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Non-maturity deposits⁽³⁾
265,483
309,445
241,396
1,703,908
2,520,232
Certificates of deposit 1,129,543
1,328,294
451,238
1,346
2,910,421
Borrowings⁽⁴⁾
675,000
850,000
750,000
142,557
2,417,557
Total interest-bearing liabilities 2,070,026
2,487,739
1,442,634
1,847,811
7,848,210

Excess (deficiency) of interest-earning assets over
interest-bearing liabilities $ 641,642
$ (224,598 ) $ (158,116 ) $ 639,490
$ 898,418

Cumulative excess of interest-earning assets over
interest-bearing liabilities $ 641,642
$ 417,044
$ 258,928
$ 898,418

Cumulative excess of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing
liabilities as a percent of total Bank assets at:
September 30, 2017 6.98 % 4.54 % 2.82 % 9.77 %
September 30, 2016 11.54

Cumulative one-year gap - interest rates +200 bps at:
September 30, 2017 0.88

September 30, 2016 2.25

More Than

Within

One Year to

Three Years

Over

One Year

Three Years

to Five Years

Five Years

Total

Cumulative excess of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing

liabilities as a percent of total Bank assets at:

September 30, 2020

4.58

9.23

8.40

8.64

September 30, 2019

5.21

Cumulative one-year gap - interest rates +200 bps at:

September 30, 2020

(6.44)

September 30, 2019

(3.88)

~~(1)~~

ARM loans are included in the period in which the rate is next scheduled to adjust or in the period in which repayments are expected to occur, or prepayments are expected to be received, prior to their next rate adjustment, rather than in the period in which the loans are due. Fixed-rate loans are included in the periods in which they are scheduled to be repaid, based on scheduled amortization and prepayment assumptions. Balances are net of undisbursed amounts and deferred fees and exclude loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure.


~~(2)~~	MBS reflect projected prepayments at amortized cost. Investment securities are presented based on contractual maturities, term to call dates or pre-refunding dates as of September 30, 2017, at amortized cost.

~~(3)~~

Although the Bank's checking, savings, and money market accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal, management considers a substantial amount of these accounts to be core deposits having significantly longer effective maturities. The decay rates (the assumed rates at which the balances of existing accounts decline) used on these accounts is based on assumptions developed from our actual experiences with these accounts. If all of the Bank's checking, savings, and money market accounts had been assumed to be subject to repricing within one year, interest-bearing liabilities which were estimated to mature or reprice within one year would have exceeded interest-earning assets with comparable characteristics by $1.61 billion, for a cumulative one-year gap of (17.5)% of total assets.


~~(4)~~	~~Borrowings exclude deferred prepayment penalty costs.~~

(1)Adjustable-rate loans are included in the period in which the rate is next scheduled to adjust or in the period in which repayments are expected to occur, or prepayments are expected to be received, prior to their next rate adjustment, rather than in the period in which the loans are due. Fixed-rate loans are included in the periods in which they are scheduled to be repaid, based on scheduled amortization and prepayment assumptions. Balances are net of undisbursed amounts and deferred fees and exclude loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure.

(2)MBS reflect projected prepayments at amortized cost. Investment securities are presented based on contractual maturities, term to call dates or pre-refunding dates as of September 30, 2020, at amortized cost.

(3)Although the Bank's checking, savings, and money market accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal, management considers a substantial amount of these accounts to be core deposits having significantly longer effective maturities. The decay rates (the assumed rates at which the balances of existing accounts decline) used on these accounts is based on assumptions developed from our actual experiences with these accounts. If all of the Bank's checking, savings, and money market accounts had been assumed to be subject to repricing within one year, interest-bearing liabilities which were estimated to mature or reprice within one year would have exceeded interest-earning assets with comparable characteristics by $2.07 billion, for a cumulative one-year gap of (21.8)% of total assets.

(4)Borrowings exclude deferred prepayment penalty costs. Included in this line item are $640.0 million of FHLB adjustable-rate advances with interest rate swaps. The repricing for these liabilities is projected to occur at the maturity date of each interest rate swap.

Change in Net Interest Income. The Bank's net interest income projections are a reflection of the response to interest rates of the assets and liabilities that are expected to mature or reprice over the next year. Repricing occurs as a result of cash flows that are received or paid on assets or due on liabilities which would be replaced at then current market interest ~~rates.~~rates or on adjustable-rate products that reset during the next year. The Bank's borrowings and certificate of deposit portfolios have stated maturities and the cash flows related to the Bank's liabilities do not generally fluctuate as a result of changes in interest rates. Cash flows from mortgage-related assets and callable agency debentures can vary significantly as a result of changes in interest rates. As interest rates decrease, borrowers have an economic incentive to lower their cost of debt by refinancing or endorsing their mortgage to a lower interest rate. Similarly, agency debt issuers are more likely to exercise embedded call options for agency securities and issue new securities at a lower interest rate.

For each date presented in the following table, the estimated change in the Bank's net interest income is based on the indicated instantaneous, parallel and permanent change in interest ~~rates is presented.~~rates. The change in each interest rate environment represents the difference between estimated net interest income in the 0 basis point interest rate environment ("base case," assumes the forward market and product interest rates implied by the yield curve are realized) and the estimated net interest income in each alternative interest rate environment (assumes market and product interest rates have a parallel shift in rates across all maturities by the indicated change in rates). Projected cash flows for each scenario are based upon varying prepayment assumptions to model likely customer behavior changes as market rates change. ~~At all dates presented,~~For the ~~three-month Treasury bill~~current year, multiple yields along the yield ~~was~~curve were less than one percent, so the -100 basis points scenario was not applicable. Estimations of net interest income used in preparing the table below were based upon the assumptions that the total composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities does not change materially and that any repricing of assets or liabilities occurs at anticipated product and market rates for the alternative rate environments as of the dates presented. The estimation of net interest income does not include any projected gains or losses related to the sale of loans or securities, or income derived from non-interest income sources, but does include the use of different prepayment assumptions in the alternative interest rate environments. It is important to consider that estimated changes in net interest income are for a cumulative four-quarter period. These do not reflect the earnings expectations of management.


Change	Net Interest Income At September 30,
(in Basis Points)	2020						2019
in Interest Rates(1)	Amount ($)		Change ($)		Change (%)		Amount ($)		Change ($)		Change (%)
	(Dollars in thousands)

000 bp	$	183,596	$	—	—	%	$	193,329	$	—	—	%
+100 bp	188,084		4,488		2.44		194,093		764		0.40
+200 bp	188,417		4,821		2.63		192,111		(1,218)		(0.63)
+300 bp	186,441		2,845		1.55		188,752		(4,577)		(2.37)

Change Net Interest Income At September 30,
(in Basis Points) 2017 2016
in Interest Rates⁽¹⁾
Amount ($) Change ($) Change (%) Amount ($) Change ($) Change (%)
(Dollars in thousands)
-100 bp N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
000 bp $ 187,823
$ —
— % $ 188,696
$ —
— %
+100 bp 189,259
1,436
0.76
192,921
4,225
2.24
+200 bp 188,508
685
0.36
194,919
6,223
3.30
+300 bp 186,299
(1,524 ) (0.81 ) 195,187
6,491
3.44


~~(1)~~	~~Assumes an instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates at all maturities.~~

(1)Assumes an instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates at all maturities.

The ~~Bank's projected~~ net interest income isprojection was lower in the base case scenario at September 30, 2020 compared to September 30, 2019 due to lower interest rates at September 30, 2020 compared to September 30, 2019. Because the Bank's gap was positive during the current year, assets have repriced downward at a faster pace than liabilities, resulting in a lower base case net interest income projection at September 30, 2020.

The net interest income projections increase from the base case in all rising interest rate scenarios at September 30, 2020. The net interest income projection was more adversely impacted in the rising interest rate scenarios at September 30, ~~2017 than at~~2019 compared to September 30, 2016. The Bank's one-year gap amount was positive for both periods. Therefore, as market interest rates rise, the Bank's assets are projected to reprice higher at a faster pace than liabilities. The net interest income projections were negative in the +300 basis point scenario at September 30, 2017 compared to being positive at September 30, 2016. This change was2020, due primarily to higher ~~market~~ interest rates at September 30, ~~2017, which resulted in a decrease in the Bank's one-year gap. As~~2019. The positive impact of rising interest rates ~~rise,~~is diminished as interest rates increase. Higher interest rates decreased the ~~one-year gap eventually becomes negative due to a reduction in~~projected cash flows from the Bank's mortgage-related assets, ~~and callable agency debentures. See below for additional discussion~~thus decreasing the positive impact of ~~the reasons for this result. At September 30, 2017, modeled in the +300 basis point scenario, liabilities would reprice to higher~~rising interest rates ~~at a faster pace than assets and have a negative impact on~~compared to the ~~Bank's net interest income projection.~~base case.

Change in MVPE. Changes in the estimated market values of our financial assets and liabilities drive changes in estimates of MVPE. The market value of an asset or liability reflects the present value of all the projected cash flows over its remaining life, discounted at ~~current~~ market interest rates. As interest rates rise, generally the market value for both financial assets and liabilities decrease. The opposite is generally true as interest rates fall. The MVPE represents the theoretical market value of capital that is calculated by netting the market value of assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments. If the market values of financial assets increase at a faster pace than the market values of financial liabilities, or if the market values of financial liabilities decrease at a faster pace than the market values of financial assets, the MVPE will increase. The market value of shorter term-to-maturity financial instruments is less sensitive to changes in interest rates than are longer term-to-maturity financial instruments. Because of this, the market values of our certificates of deposit (which generally have relatively shorter average lives) tend to display less sensitivity to changes in interest rates than do our mortgage-related assets (which generally have relatively longer average lives). The average life expected on our mortgage-related assets varies under different interest rate environments because borrowers have the ability to prepay their mortgage loans. Therefore, as interest rates decrease, the WAL of mortgage-related assets decrease as well. As interest rates increase, the WAL would be expected to increase, as well as increasing the sensitivity of these assets in higher rate environments.

The following table sets forth the estimated change in the MVPE for each date presented based on the indicated instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates. The change in each interest rate environment represents the difference between the MVPE in the base case (assumes the forward market interest rates implied by the yield curve are realized) and the MVPE in each alternative interest rate environment (assumes market interest rates have a parallel shift in rates). ~~At the dates presented, the three-month Treasury bill yield was less than one percent, so the -100 basis points scenario was not applicable.~~ Projected cash flows for each scenario are based upon varying prepayment assumptions to model likely customer behavior ~~changes~~ as market rates change. For the current year, multiple yields along the yield curve were less than one percent, so the -100 basis points scenario was not applicable. The estimations of the MVPE used in preparing the table below were based upon the assumptions that the total composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities does not change, that any repricing of assets or liabilities occurs at current product or market rates for the alternative rate environments as of the dates presented, and that different prepayment rates were used in each alternative interest rate environment. The estimated MVPE results from the valuation of cash flows from financial assets and liabilities over the anticipated lives of each for each interest rate environment. The table below presents the effects of the changes in interest rates on our assets and liabilities as they mature, repay, or reprice, as shown by the change in the MVPE for alternative interest rates.


Change	Market Value of Portfolio Equity At September 30,
(in Basis Points)	2020						2019
in Interest Rates(1)	Amount ($)		Change ($)		Change (%)		Amount ($)		Change ($)		Change (%)
	(Dollars in thousands)

000 bp	$	1,301,409	$	—	—	%	$	1,283,429	$	—	—	%
+100 bp	1,290,877		(10,532)		(0.81)		1,286,446		3,017		0.24
+200 bp	1,157,368		(144,041)		(11.07)		1,162,151		(121,278)		(9.45)
+300 bp	967,997		(333,412)		(25.62)		992,060		(291,369)		(22.70)

Change Market Value of Portfolio Equity At September 30,
(in Basis Points) 2017 2016
in Interest Rates⁽¹⁾
Amount ($) Change ($) Change (%) Amount ($) Change ($) Change (%)
(Dollars in thousands)
-100 bp N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
000 bp $ 1,460,428
$ —
— % $ 1,448,758
$ —
— %
+100 bp 1,352,558
(107,870 ) (7.39 ) 1,364,879
(83,879 ) (5.79 )
+200 bp 1,173,891
(286,537 ) (19.62 ) 1,208,130
(240,628 ) (16.61 )
+300 bp 969,747
(490,681 ) (33.60 ) 1,014,446
(434,312 ) (29.98 )

(1)Assumes an instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates at all maturities.


~~(1)~~	~~Assumes an instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates at all maturities.~~

The percentage change in the Bank's MVPE at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 was ~~more adversely impacted~~negative in all scenarios. At September 30, 2019 the percentage change in the ~~increasing~~Bank's MVPE was negative in the +200 and +300 basis point scenarios. This change was due primarily to a change in the Bank's interest rate risk model, of which the most significant impact was on the valuation of the Bank's non-maturity deposit portfolio. The model changes resulted in a shorter duration for these liabilities than was modeled at September 30, 2019, which reduced their sensitivity to changes in interest rates. The Bank's MVPE decreases as interest rates rise, as the market value for assets decreases at a faster pace than these liabilities. The negative impact to the MVPE in the rising interest rate scenarios ~~than at September 30, 2016~~is due ~~primarily~~ to ~~market interest rates being higher at September 30, 2017.~~slower prepayment projections on the Bank's mortgage-related assets and investments. As interest rates increase, borrowers have less economic incentive to refinance their mortgages and agency debt issuers have less economic incentive or opportunity to exercise their call options in order to issue new debt at lower interest rates, resulting in lower projected cash flows on these assets. As interest rates increase in the rising rate scenarios, repayments on mortgage-related assets are more likely to decrease and only be realized through significant changes in borrowers' lives such as divorce, death, job-related relocations, or other events as there is less economic incentive for borrowers to prepay their ~~debt. This results~~debt, resulting in an increase in the average life of mortgage-related assets. Similarly, call projections for the Bank's callable agency debentures decrease as interest rates rise, which results in cash flows related to these assets moving closer to the contractual maturity dates. The higher expected average lives of these assets, relative to the assumptions in the base case interest rate environment, increases the sensitivity of their market value to changes in interest rates. As a result, the projected decrease in the market value of the Bank's financial assets was more significant than the projected decrease in the market value of its financial liabilities, which resulted in a projected decrease in MVPE in all of the rising interest rate scenarios presented. The impact of higher interest rates at September 30, 2017 was partially offset by the changes in the deposit model discussed above.

The following table presents the weighted average yields/rates and WALs (in years), after applying prepayment, call assumptions, and decay rates for our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Yields presented for interest-earning assets include the amortization of fees, costs, premiums and discounts, which are considered adjustments to the yield. The interest rate presented for term borrowings is the effective rate, which includes the impact of interest rate swaps and the amortization of deferred prepayment penalties resulting from FHLB advances previously prepaid. The WAL presented for term borrowings includes the effect of interest rate swaps. The maturity and repricing terms presented for one- to four-family loans represent the contractual terms of the loan.


	Amount		Yield/Rate		WAL	% of Category		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Investment securities	$	380,147	0.65	%	1.0	24.3	%	4.2	%
MBS - fixed	970,369		1.82		3.3	62.2		10.7
MBS - adjustable	210,434		2.49		3.1	13.5		2.3
Total securities	1,560,950		1.62		2.7	100.0	%	17.2
Loans receivable:
Fixed-rate one- to four-family:
<= 15 years	1,130,538		2.98		3.1	15.6	%	12.5
> 15 years	4,287,229		3.67		4.2	59.3		47.3
Fixed-rate commercial	556,195		4.14		3.5	7.7		6.1
All other fixed-rate loans	47,855		4.53		4.9	0.7		0.5
Total fixed-rate loans	6,021,817		3.59		3.9	83.3		66.4
Adjustable-rate one- to four-family:
<= 36 months	189,591		2.25		4.8	2.6		2.1
> 36 months	639,461		3.09		3.2	8.9		7.1
Adjustable-rate commercial	273,465		4.75		6.6	3.8		3.0
All other adjustable-rate loans	100,662		4.23		2.5	1.4		1.1
Total adjustable-rate loans	1,203,179		3.43		4.2	16.7		13.3
Total loans receivable	7,224,996		3.57		4.0	100.0	%	79.7
FHLB stock	93,862		4.64		1.9			1.0
Cash and cash equivalents	185,148		0.09		—			2.1
Total interest-earning assets	$	9,064,956	3.18		3.6			100.0	%

Non-maturity deposits	$	3,170,164	0.20		6.1	51.2	%	39.7	%
Retail/business certificates of deposit	2,766,461		1.83		1.5	44.7		34.6
Public unit certificates of deposit	254,783		0.74		0.5	4.1		3.2
Total deposits	6,191,408		0.95		3.8	100.0	%	77.5
Term borrowings	1,793,000		2.31		3.0			22.5


Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	7,984,408	1.26		3.6			100.0	%

Amount Yield/Rate WAL % of Category % of Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Investment securities $ 301,122
1.33 % 1.5
24.2 % 3.4 %
MBS - fixed 633,874
2.14
2.9
51.0
7.1
MBS - adjustable 308,573
2.55
4.6
24.8
3.5
Total securities 1,243,569
2.05
3.0
100.0 % 14.0
Loans receivable:
Fixed-rate one- to four-family:
<= 15 years 1,211,167
3.09
4.0
16.9 % 13.6
> 15 years 4,428,085
3.85
6.0
61.6
49.9
All other fixed-rate loans 268,472
4.20
4.0
3.7
3.0
Total fixed-rate loans 5,907,724
3.71
5.5
82.2
66.5
Adjustable-rate one- to four-family:
<= 36 months 264,387
1.77
3.2
3.7
3.0
> 36 months 852,609
3.09
2.7
11.9
9.6
All other adjustable-rate loans 158,031
4.92
3.1
2.2
1.8
Total adjustable-rate loans 1,275,027
3.04
2.8
17.8
14.4
Total loans receivable 7,182,751
3.59
5.0
100.0 % 80.9
FHLB stock 100,954
6.47
2.3
1.1
Cash and cash equivalents 351,659
1.25
—
4.0
Total interest-earning assets $ 8,878,933
3.32
4.5
100.0 %

Non-maturity deposits $ 2,399,447
0.17
13.5
45.2 % 31.2 %
Retail certificates of deposit 2,450,418
1.52
1.8
46.1
31.9
Public units 460,003
1.28
0.8
8.7
6.0
Total deposits 5,309,868
0.89
7.0
100.0 % 69.1
Term borrowings 2,375,000
2.16
2.7
30.9
Total interest-bearing liabilities $ 7,684,868
1.28
5.7
100.0 %

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

~~REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~

~~To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of~~

~~Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and subsidiary~~

~~Topeka, Kansas~~

~~We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and subsidiary (the "Company") as of September 30, 2017, based on criteria established in~~ ~~Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)~~ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

~~In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on the criteria established in~~ ~~Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)~~ ~~issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.~~

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30, 2017 of the Company and our report dated November 29, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

~~Kansas City, Missouri~~

~~November 29, 2017~~

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors ~~and Stockholders~~ of

Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and subsidiary

~~Topeka, Kansas~~

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and subsidiary (the "Company") as of September 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30, 2020, of the Company and our report dated November 25, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Kansas City, Missouri

November 25, 2020

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and subsidiary

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and subsidiary (the "Company") as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016, and~~2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, ~~2017.~~ 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 25, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on ~~these~~the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the ~~Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).~~PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material ~~misstatement. An audit includes~~misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence ~~supporting~~regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. ~~An audit~~Our audits also ~~includes assessing~~included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial ~~statement presentation.~~statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~In our opinion, such consolidated~~Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements ~~present fairly, in all~~that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material ~~respects,~~to the financial ~~position~~statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of ~~Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years~~critical audit matters does not alter in ~~the period ended September 30, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.~~

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on the criteria established in ~~Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)~~ ~~issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and~~any way our ~~report dated November 29, 2017 expressed an unqualified~~ opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allowance for Credit Losses - Refer to Notes 1 and 5 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Management's methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses (ACL) consists of a formula analysis model, along with analyzing and considering several other relevant internal and external factors. In the formula analysis model, historical loss factors, as adjusted, are applied to each loan category and qualitative factors are applied to reflect risks inherent in each loan category that are not captured by the historical loss factors. Management reviews the factors quarterly to assess whether the factors adequately cover probable and estimable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management also analyzes and considers several other relevant internal and external factors, including the national and state unemployment rates, national and state unemployment benefit claim levels, the amount of and timing of financial assistance provided by the government and the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program, residential real estate value trends, credit score trends, delinquent loan trends, consumer spending levels and trends, industries significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, commercial lending's review of the Bank's largest commercial loan relationships, historical peer ACL to loan

ratios and industry and peer charge-off percentages, among other considerations. Based on management's review of these data elements, they evaluate the reasonableness of the ACL on an ongoing basis and whether any changes need to be made to the Bank's ACL methodology, including the consideration of the economic conditions. During the current fiscal year, management increased the historical loss and qualitative factors applied in the formula analysis model for all loan categories and added a COVID-19 qualitative loss factor to the Bank's commercial loan portfolio.

Considering the estimation and judgment required by management in determining adjustments for qualitative factors, our audit of the ACL and the related disclosures required a high degree of auditor judgment with regard to the qualitative adjustments specifically to the commercial loan portfolio.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the ACL formula analysis model included the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of controls over the Company's ACL formula analysis model inclusive of the controls over loan charge-off activity and including additional considerations with respect to current economic conditions and management's review of the adequacy of the ACL.

•We tested the classification and appropriate segregation of loan categories based on certain risk characteristics in order to evaluate the application of the relevant economic and qualitative assumptions.

•We evaluated the appropriateness and relevance of the data elements by comparing to relevant internal ~~control over financial reporting.~~and external sources.

•We tested the mathematical accuracy of (i) the historical charge-off activity, (ii) the quantitative measures of the qualitative loss factors, and (iii) the formula analysis model calculations.

•We assessed the reasonableness of, and evaluated support for, key qualitative adjustments based on market and economic conditions and/or portfolio performance metrics.

•We assessed the reasonableness of, and evaluated support for, the COVID-19 qualitative factor applied to the commercial portfolio including (i) industries significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, (ii) commercial lending's review of commercial loan relationships, and (iii) COVID-19 loan modifications.

•We evaluated analytics, trends, and peer analysis of the overall ACL formula analysis model to assess for reasonableness.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Kansas City, Missouri

November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020

We have served as the Company's auditor since 1974.

CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 and 2016 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

2017
2016
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents (includes interest-earning deposits of $340,748 and $267,829) $ 351,659
$ 281,764
Securities:
Available-for-sale ("AFS"), at estimated fair value (amortized cost of $410,541 and $517,791) 415,831
527,301
Held-to-maturity ("HTM"), at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $833,009
and $1,122,867) 827,738
1,100,874
Loans receivable, net (allowance for credit losses ("ACL") of $8,398 and $8,540) 7,195,071
6,958,024
Federal Home Loan Bank Topeka ("FHLB") stock, at cost 100,954
109,970
Premises and equipment, net 84,818
83,221
Other assets 216,845
206,093
TOTAL ASSETS $ 9,192,916
$ 9,267,247

LIABILITIES:
Deposits $ 5,309,868
$ 5,164,018
FHLB borrowings 2,173,808
2,372,389
Repurchase agreements 200,000
200,000
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance 63,749
62,643
Income taxes payable, net 530
310
Deferred income tax liabilities, net 24,458
25,374
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 52,190
49,549
Total liabilities 7,824,603
7,874,283

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding —
—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,400,000,000 shares authorized, 138,223,835 and 137,486,172
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively 1,382
1,375
Additional paid-in capital 1,167,368
1,156,855
Unearned compensation, Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") (37,995 ) (39,647 )
Retained earnings 234,640
268,466
Accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), net of tax 2,918
5,915
Total stockholders' equity 1,368,313
1,392,964
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 9,192,916
$ 9,267,247

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 and 2019 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	2020		2019
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents (includes interest-earning deposits of $172,430 and $198,809)	$	185,148	$	220,370
Available-for-sale ("AFS") securities, at estimated fair value	1,560,950		1,204,863

Loans receivable, net (allowance for credit losses ("ACL") of $31,527 and $9,226)	7,202,851		7,416,747
Federal Home Loan Bank Topeka ("FHLB") stock, at cost	93,862		98,456
Premises and equipment, net	101,875		96,784
Income taxes receivable, net	0		2

Other assets	342,532		302,796
TOTAL ASSETS	$	9,487,218	$	9,340,018

LIABILITIES:
Deposits	$	6,191,408	$	5,581,867
Borrowings	1,789,313		2,239,989

Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	65,721		65,686
Income taxes payable, net	795		0
Deferred income tax liabilities, net	8,180		14,282
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	146,942		101,868
Total liabilities	8,202,359		8,003,692

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued or outstanding	0		0
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,400,000,000 shares authorized, 138,956,296 and 141,440,030 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively	1,389		1,414
Additional paid-in capital	1,189,853		1,210,226
Unearned compensation, Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP")	(33,040)		(34,692)
Retained earnings	143,162		174,277
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ("AOCI"), net of tax	(16,505)		(14,899)
Total stockholders' equity	1,284,859		1,336,326
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	9,487,218	$	9,340,018


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

2017
2016
2015
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans receivable $ 253,393
$ 243,311
$ 235,500
Mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") 23,809
29,794
36,647
Cash and cash equivalents 19,389
9,831
5,477
FHLB stock 12,233
12,252
12,556
Investment securities 4,362
5,925
7,182
Total interest and dividend income 313,186
301,113
297,362
INTEREST EXPENSE:
FHLB borrowings 68,871
65,091
67,797
Deposits 42,968
37,859
33,119
Repurchase agreements 5,965
5,981
6,678
Total interest expense 117,804
108,931
107,594
NET INTEREST INCOME 195,382
192,182
189,768
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES —
(750 ) 771
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES 195,382
192,932
188,997
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Retail fees and charges 15,053
14,835
14,897
Income from bank-owned life insurance ("BOLI") 2,233
3,420
1,150
Other non-interest income 4,910
5,057
5,093
Total non-interest income 22,196
23,312
21,140
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits 43,437
42,378
43,309
Information technology and communications 11,282
10,540
10,360
Occupancy, net 10,814
10,576
9,944
Regulatory and outside services 5,821
5,645
5,347
Deposit and loan transaction costs 5,284
5,585
5,417
Advertising and promotional 4,673
4,609
4,547
Federal insurance premium 3,539
5,076
5,495
Office supplies and related expense 1,981
2,640
2,088
Low income housing partnerships —
3,872
4,572
Other non-interest expense 2,827
3,384
3,290
Total non-interest expense 89,658
94,305
94,369
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE 127,920
121,939
115,768
INCOME TAX EXPENSE 43,783
38,445
37,675
NET INCOME $ 84,137
$ 83,494
$ 78,093

Basic earnings per share ("EPS") $ 0.63
$ 0.63
$ 0.58
Diluted EPS $ 0.63
$ 0.63
$ 0.58
Dividends declared per share $ 0.88
$ 0.84
$ 0.84

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	2020		2019		2018
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans receivable	$	270,494	$	284,229	$	260,198
Mortgage-backed securities ("MBS")	23,009		25,730		22,619
FHLB stock	5,827		7,823		10,962
Investment securities	4,467		6,366		4,670
Cash and cash equivalents	1,181		5,806		23,443
Total interest and dividend income	304,978		329,954		321,892
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	67,598		66,201		52,625
Borrowings	48,045		57,363		70,494

Total interest expense	115,643		123,564		123,119
NET INTEREST INCOME	189,335		206,390		198,773
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES	22,300		750		0

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES	167,035		205,640		198,773
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Deposit service fees	11,285		12,740		15,636
Insurance commissions	2,487		2,821		2,469
Other non-interest income	5,827		6,397		3,930
Total non-interest income	19,599		21,958		22,035
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	52,996		53,145		46,563
Information technology and related expense	16,974		17,615		13,999
Occupancy, net	13,870		13,032		11,455
Regulatory and outside services	5,762		5,813		5,709
Advertising and promotional	4,889		5,244		5,034
Deposit and loan transaction costs	2,890		2,478		5,621
Office supplies and related expense	2,195		2,439		1,888
Federal insurance premium	914		1,172		3,277

Other non-interest expense	5,514		6,006		3,356
Total non-interest expense	106,004		106,944		96,902
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE	80,630		120,654		123,906
INCOME TAX EXPENSE	16,090		26,411		24,979
NET INCOME	$	64,540	$	94,243	$	98,927

Basic earnings per share ("EPS")	$	0.47	$	0.68	$	0.73
Diluted EPS	$	0.47	$	0.68	$	0.73


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 (Dollars in thousands)

2017
2016
2015
Net income $ 84,137
$ 83,494
$ 78,093
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities,
net of taxes of $1,595, $1,494, and $(843) (2,625 ) (2,459 ) 1,388
Changes in unrealized losses on cash flow hedges,
net of taxes of $226, $0, and $0 (372 ) —
—
Comprehensive income $ 81,140
$ 81,035
$ 79,481

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 (Dollars in thousands)

	2020		2019		2018
Net income	$	64,540	$	94,243	$	98,927
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities arising during the period, net of taxes of $(4,359), $(3,468), and $2,499	13,578		10,804		(6,741)
Unrealized gains on securities reclassified from held-to-maturity ("HTM") to AFS during the period, net of taxes of $0, $(750), and $0	0		2,336		0
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $4,875, $10,394, and $(2,785)	(15,184)		(32,379)		7,496
Comprehensive income	$	62,934	$	75,004	$	99,682

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Additional Unearned Total
Common Paid-In Compensation Retained Stockholders'
Stock Capital ESOP Earnings AOCI Equity
Balance at October 1, 2014 $ 1,410
$ 1,180,732
$ (42,951 ) $ 346,705
$ 6,986
$ 1,492,882
Net income, fiscal year 2015 78,093
78,093
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 1,388
1,388
ESOP activity, net 384
1,652
2,036
Restricted stock activity, net 85
85
Stock-based compensation 2,086
2,086
Repurchase of common stock (39 ) (32,513 ) (13,897 ) (46,449 )
Stock options exercised
267
267
Cash dividends to stockholders ($0.84 per share) (114,162 ) (114,162 )
Balance at September 30, 2015 1,371
1,151,041
(41,299 ) 296,739
8,374
1,416,226

Net income, fiscal year 2016 83,494
83,494
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax (2,459 ) (2,459 )
ESOP activity, net 522
1,652
2,174
Restricted stock activity, net 1
48
49
Stock-based compensation 1,121
1,121
Stock options exercised 3
4,123
4,126
Cash dividends to stockholders ($0.84 per share) (111,767 ) (111,767 )
Balance at September 30, 2016 1,375
1,156,855
(39,647 ) 268,466
5,915
1,392,964

Net income, fiscal year 2017 84,137
84,137
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax (2,997 ) (2,997 )
ESOP activity, net 784
1,652
2,436
Restricted stock activity, net 57
57
Stock-based compensation 506
506
Stock options exercised 7
9,166
9,173
Cash dividends to stockholders ($0.88 per share) (117,963 ) (117,963 )
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 1,382
$ 1,167,368
$ (37,995 ) $ 234,640
$ 2,918
$ 1,368,313

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

			Additional		Unearned						Total
	Common		Paid-In		Compensation		Retained				Stockholders'
	Stock		Capital		ESOP		Earnings		AOCI		Equity
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	1,382	$	1,167,368	$	(37,995)	$	234,640	$	2,918	$	1,368,313

Net income, fiscal year 2018							98,927				98,927
Other comprehensive income, net of tax									755		755
Reclassification of certain tax effects related to adopting Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2018-02							(667)		667		0
Cumulative effect of adopting ASU 2016-09			19				(19)				0
Capital City Bancshares, Inc. ("CCB") acquisition	30		39,083								39,113
ESOP activity			541		1,652						2,193

Stock-based compensation			372								372

Stock options exercised			261								261
Cash dividends to stockholders ($0.88 per share)							(118,312)				(118,312)
Balance at September 30, 2018	1,412		1,207,644		(36,343)		214,569		4,340		1,391,622

Net income, fiscal year 2019							94,243				94,243
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax									(19,239)		(19,239)
Cumulative effect of adopting ASU 2014-09							394				394


ESOP activity			549		1,651						2,200
Restricted stock activity, net	1		(3)								(2)
Stock-based compensation			552								552

Stock options exercised	1		1,484								1,485
Cash dividends to stockholders ($0.98 per share)							(134,929)				(134,929)
Balance at September 30, 2019	1,414		1,210,226		(34,692)		174,277		(14,899)		1,336,326

Net income, fiscal year 2020							64,540				64,540
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax									(1,606)		(1,606)


Cumulative effect of adopting ASU 2016-02							88				88

ESOP activity			336		1,652						1,988
Restricted stock activity, net			(19)								(19)
Stock-based compensation			570								570
Repurchase of common stock	(26)		(21,897)				(1,881)				(23,804)
Stock options exercised	1		637								638
Cash dividends to stockholders ($0.68 per share)							(93,862)				(93,862)
Balance at September 30, 2020	$	1,389	$	1,189,853	$	(33,040)	$	143,162	$	(16,505)	$	1,284,859


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 (Dollars in thousands)

2017
2016
2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 84,137
$ 83,494
$ 78,093
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
FHLB stock dividends (12,233 ) (12,252 ) (12,556 )
Provision for credit losses —
(750 ) 771
Proceeds from sales of loans receivable held-for-sale 6,816
—
—
Amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on securities 4,479
5,342
5,649
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment 7,796
7,141
6,844
Amortization of deferred amounts related to FHLB advances, net 1,419
1,868
4,196
Common stock committed to be released for allocation - ESOP 2,436
2,174
2,036
Stock-based compensation 506
1,121
2,086
Provision for deferred income taxes 922
470
3,201
Changes in:
Other assets, net (680 ) 1,807
3,878
Income taxes payable/receivable 590
1,381
(1,374 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (10,743 ) (6,840 ) (6,215 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 85,445
84,956
86,609

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of AFS securities (37,425 ) (99,927 ) (149,937 )
Purchase of HTM securities —
(144,392 ) (54,133 )
Proceeds from calls, maturities and principal reductions of AFS securities 144,643
326,814
234,794
Proceeds from calls, maturities and principal reductions of HTM securities 268,689
309,328
330,054
Proceeds from the redemption of FHLB stock 386,900
382,450
265,929
Purchase of FHLB stock (365,651 ) (329,625 ) (190,862 )
Net increase in loans receivable (246,882 ) (336,056 ) (398,307 )
Purchase of premises and equipment (9,128 ) (14,854 ) (12,022 )
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned ("OREO") 5,138
4,973
5,987
Purchase of BOLI —
—
(50,000 )
Proceeds from BOLI death benefit —
783
—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 146,284
99,494
(18,497 )

(Continued)


CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 (Dollars in thousands)

	2020		2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	64,540	$	94,243	$	98,927
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
FHLB stock dividends	(5,827)		(7,823)		(10,962)
Provision for credit losses	22,300		750		0
Originations of loans receivable held-for-sale ("LHFS")	0		0		(777)
Proceeds from sales of LHFS	0		0		16,423
Amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on securities	1,661		1,242		3,150
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment	9,133		9,143		8,458
Amortization of intangible assets	1,964		2,316		234
Amortization of deferred amounts related to FHLB advances, net	539		8		1,173
Common stock committed to be released for allocation - ESOP	1,988		2,200		2,193
Stock-based compensation	570		552		372
Provision for deferred income taxes	(5,588)		(361)		(4,540)
Changes in:
Unrestricted cash collateral (provided to)/received from derivative counterparties, net	0		(9,970)		10,701
Other assets, net	9,105		6,220		1,712
Income taxes payable/receivable, net	774		2,173		(2,262)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(8,231)		(19,746)		(639)
Net cash provided by operating activities	92,928		80,947		124,163

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of AFS securities	(1,007,763)		(386,702)		(411,459)

Proceeds from calls, maturities and principal reductions of AFS securities	667,952		359,551		192,966
Proceeds from calls, maturities and principal reductions of HTM securities	0		165,336		212,267
Proceeds from sale of AFS securities	0		0		2,078
Proceeds from the redemption of FHLB stock	10,421		197,054		291,506
Purchase of FHLB stock	0		(187,961)		(277,552)
Net change in loans receivable	191,359		95,358		(37,537)
Purchase of premises and equipment	(14,742)		(11,732)		(11,761)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned ("OREO")	993		2,053		2,240
Cash acquired from acquisition	0		0		15,685
Proceeds from the redemption of common equity securities related to the redemption of junior subordinated debentures	0		302		0

Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance ("BOLI") death benefit	490		0		0
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(151,290)		233,259		(21,567)

					(Continued)


CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY	CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY									CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS									CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 (Dollars in thousands)
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 (Dollars in thousands)										YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 (Dollars in thousands)

	2017			2016			2015				2020		2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:										CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash dividends paid	(117,963		)	(111,767		)	(114,162		)	Cash dividends paid	(93,862)		(134,929)		(118,312)
Net change in deposits	145,850			331,498			177,248			Net change in deposits	609,541		(21,487)		(58,988)
Proceeds from borrowings	2,700,100			8,000,100			7,575,100			Proceeds from borrowings	1,665,600		5,518,700		17,275,100
Repayments on borrowings	(2,900,100		)	(8,900,100		)	(7,695,100		)	Repayments on borrowings	(2,112,600)		(5,563,752)		(17,414,200)

Change in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	1,106			825			3,713			Change in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	35		422		939
Payment of FHLB prepayment penalties	—			—			(3,352		)	Payment of FHLB prepayment penalties	(4,215)		0		0
Repurchase of common stock	—			—			(50,034		)	Repurchase of common stock	(20,767)		0		0
Stock options exercised	8,843			4,070			267			Stock options exercised	638		1,485		261
Excess tax benefits from stock options	330			56			—
Net cash used in financing activities	(161,834		)	(675,318		)	(106,320		)

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	69,895			(490,868		)	(38,208		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities										Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	44,370		(199,561)		(315,200)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESTRICTED CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS										NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESTRICTED CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS	(13,992)		114,645		(212,604)

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESTRICTED CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS:										CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESTRICTED CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of year	281,764			772,632			810,840			Beginning of year	253,700		139,055		351,659
End of year	$	351,659		$	281,764		$	772,632		End of year	$	239,708	$	253,700	$	139,055

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:										SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income tax payments	$	37,875		$	36,483		$	35,849		Income tax payments	$	13,045	$	17,779	$	24,785
Interest payments	$	117,308		$	106,182		$	103,784		Interest payments	$	118,610	$	123,508	$	119,699

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:										SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Loans transferred to LHFS										Loans transferred to LHFS	$	0	$	0	$	15,814
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained										Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained	$	16,841	$	0	$	0
Operating lease liabilities obtained										Operating lease liabilities obtained	$	16,726	$	0	$	0
Acquisition:										Acquisition:
Common stock issued										Common stock issued	$	0	$	0	$	39,113
Fair value of assets acquired, excluding acquired cash and intangibles										Fair value of assets acquired, excluding acquired cash and intangibles	$	0	$	0	$	418,062
Fair value of liabilities assumed										Fair value of liabilities assumed	$	0	$	0	$	412,675
Transfer of HTM securities, at amortized cost, to AFS securities										Transfer of HTM securities, at amortized cost, to AFS securities	$	0	$	444,732	$	0

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.							(Concluded)			See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.					(Concluded)

CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015~~2018

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business - Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (the "Company") provides a full range of retail banking services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Capitol Federal Savings Bank (the "Bank"), a federal savings bank, which has 3745 traditional and 109 in-store banking offices serving primarily the metropolitan areas of Topeka, Wichita, Lawrence, Manhattan, Emporia and Salina, Kansas and portions of the Kansas City metropolitan ~~area of greater Kansas City.~~area. The Bank emphasizes mortgage lending, primarily originating and purchasing one- to four-family loans, and providing personal retail financial ~~services.~~services, along with offering commercial banking and lending products. The Bank is subject to competition from other financial institutions and other companies that provide financial services.

Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank. The Bank has atwo wholly owned ~~subsidiary,~~subsidiaries, Capitol Funds, Inc. and Capital City Investments, Inc. Capitol Funds, Inc. has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Capitol Federal Mortgage Reinsurance ~~Company ("CFMRC").~~Company. Capital City Investments, Inc. is a real estate and investment holding company. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. ~~These~~The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in ~~conformity~~accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), and require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

The Bank has an expense sharing agreement with the Company that covers the reimbursement of certain expenses that are allocable to the Company. These expenses include compensation, rent for leased office space, and general overhead expenses.

The Company, the Bank, Capitol Funds, Inc. and CFMRC have a tax allocation agreement. The Bank is the paying agent to the taxing authorities for the group for all periods presented. Each entity is liable for taxes as if separate tax returns were filed and reimburses the Bank for its pro rata share of the tax liability. If any entity has a tax benefit, the Bank reimburses the entity for its tax benefit.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents - Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents reported in the statement of cash flows include cash and cash equivalents ~~include~~of $185.1 million and $220.4 million at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and restricted cash and cash equivalents of $54.6 million and $33.3 million at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which was included in other assets on ~~hand~~the consolidated balance sheet. The restricted cash and ~~amounts due~~ cash equivalents relate to the collateral postings to/from ~~banks.~~ the Bank's derivative counterparties associated with the Bank's interest rate swaps. See additional discussion regarding the interest rate swaps in Note 9. Deposits and Borrowed Funds.

Regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB") require federally chartered savings banks to maintain cash reserves against their transaction accounts. Required reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash, an account at a Federal Reserve Bank, or a pass-through account as defined by the FRB. The amount of interest-earning deposits held at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City ("FRB of Kansas City") as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019 was ~~$337.5~~$172.2 million and ~~$264.4~~$198.6 million, respectively. The Bank is in compliance with the FRB requirements. For the years ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, the average daily balance of required reserves at the FRB of Kansas City was ~~$9.1~~$6.6 million and ~~$8.8~~$21.5 million, respectively.

Net Presentation of Cash Flows Related to Borrowings - ~~During the current fiscal year,~~At times, the Bank ~~entered~~enters into certain FHLB advances with contractual maturities of 90 days or less. Cash flows related to these advances are reported on a net basis in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Securities - Securities include MBS and agency debentures issued primarily by United States Government-Sponsored Enterprises ("GSE"), including Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal Home Loan Banks, United States Government agencies, including Government National Mortgage Association, and municipal bonds. Securities are classified as HTM, AFS, or trading based on management's intention for holding the securities on the date of purchase. Generally, classifications are made in response to liquidity needs, asset/liability management strategies, and the market interest rate environment at the time of purchase.

Securities that management has the ~~intent~~intention and ability to hold to maturity are classified as HTM and reported at amortized cost. Such securities are adjusted for the amortization of premiums and discounts which are recognized as adjustments to interest income over the life of the securities using the level-yield method. At September 30, 2020 and 2019, the portfolio did not contain any securities classified as HTM.

Securities that management may sell if necessary for liquidity or asset management purposes are classified as AFS and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of AOCI within stockholders' equity, net of deferred income taxes. The amortization of premiums and discounts are recognized as adjustments to interest income over the life of the securities using the level-yield method. Gains or losses on the disposition of AFS securities are recognized using the specific identification method. The Company primarily uses prices obtained from ~~third party~~third-party pricing services to determine the fair value of securities. See additional discussion of fair value of AFS securities in "Note ~~13.~~15. Fair Value of Financial Instruments."

Securities that are purchased and held principally for resale in the near future are classified as trading securities and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in non-interest income in the consolidated statements of income. During the fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, neither the Company nor the Bank maintained a trading securities portfolio.

Management monitors securities in the investment portfolio for impairment on an ongoing basis and performs a formal review quarterly. The process involves monitoring market events and other items that could impact issuers. The evaluation includes, but is not limited to, such factors as: the nature of the investment, the length of time the security has had a fair value less than the amortized cost basis, the cause(s) and severity of the loss, expectation of an anticipated recovery period, recent events specific to the issuer or industry including the issuer's financial condition and current ability to make future payments in a timely manner, external credit ratings and recent downgrades in such ratings, management's ~~intent~~intention to sell and whether it is more likely than not management would be required to sell prior to recovery for debt securities. Management determines whether other-than-temporary losses should be recognized for impaired securities by assessing all known facts and circumstances surrounding the securities. If management intends to sell an impaired security or if it is more likely than not that management will be required to sell an impaired security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred and the difference between amortized cost and fair value will be recognized as a loss in earnings and the security will be written down to fair value.

Loans Receivable - Loans receivable that management has the ~~intent~~intention and ability to hold for the foreseeable future are carried at the amount of unpaid principal, net of ACL, undisbursed loan funds, unamortized premiums and discounts, and deferred loan origination fees and costs. Net loan origination fees and costs, and premiums and discounts are amortized as yield adjustments to interest income using the level-yield method. Interest on loans is credited to income as earned and accrued only if deemed collectible.

Loan endorsements - Certain existing one- to four- family loan customers, including customers whose loans were purchased from a correspondent lender, have the opportunity, for a fee, to endorse their original loan terms to current loan terms being offered by the Bank. The fee received for each endorsement is deferred and amortized as an adjustment to interest income over the life of the loan. If the change in loan terms resulting from the endorsement is deemed to be more than minor, the loan is treated as a new loan and all existing unamortized deferred loan origination fees and costs are recognized at the time of endorsement. If the change in loan terms is deemed to be minor, the fee received for the endorsement is added to the net remaining unamortized deferred fee or deferred cost balance.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 ("COVID-19") loan modification programs -In March 2020, the Bank announced loan modification programs to support and provide relief for its borrowers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Generally, loan modifications under these programs ("COVID-19 loan modifications") for one- to four-family loans and consumer loans consist of a three-month payment forbearance of principal, interest, and in some cases, escrow. COVID-19 loan modifications of commercial loans mainly consist of up to a six-month interest-only payment period, but an option for a three- to six-month forbearance of principal and interest was also available to our borrowers. The Company has followed the loan modification criteria within the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act or Interagency guidance when determining if a borrower's modification is subject to troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") classification. If it is determined that the modification does not meet the criteria under the CARES Act or Interagency guidance to be excluded from TDR classification, the Company evaluates the loan modifications under its existing TDR framework. Loans subject to forbearance under the COVID-19 loan modification program are not reported as past due or placed on nonaccrual status during the forbearance time period, and interest income continues to be recognized over the contractual life of the loans.

Troubled debt restructurings ~~("TDRs")~~ - For borrowers experiencing financial difficulties, the Bank may grant a concession to the ~~borrower, resulting in a TDR.~~borrower. Such concessions generally involve extensions of loan maturity dates, the granting of periods during which ~~the~~

reduced payment ~~of only interest and escrow is~~amounts are required, and/or reductions in interest ~~rates, and loans that have been discharged under Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings where the borrower has not reaffirmed the debt.~~rates. The Bank does not forgive principal or interest, nor does it commit to lend additional funds to these borrowers, except for situations generally involving the capitalization of delinquent interest and/or escrow on one- to four-family loans and consumer loans, not to exceed the original loan ~~balance,~~amount. In the case of commercial loans, the Bank does not forgive principal or interest or commit to ~~these borrowers.~~lend additional funds unless the borrower provides additional collateral or other enhancements to improve the credit quality.

Delinquent loans - A loan is considered delinquent when payment has not been received within 30 days of its contractual due date. The number of days delinquent is determined by the number of scheduled payments that remain unpaid, assuming a period of 30 days between each scheduled payment.

Nonaccrual loans - The accrual of income on loans is generally discontinued when interest or principal payments are 90 days in arrears. We also report certain TDR loans as nonaccrual loans that are required to be reported as such pursuant to regulatory reporting requirements. Loans on which the accrual of income has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual and outstanding interest previously credited beyond 90 days delinquent is reversed, except in the case of commercial loans in which all delinquent accrued interest is reversed. A nonaccrual one- to four-family or consumer loan is returned to accrual status once the contractual payments have been made to bring the loan less than 90 days past due or, in the case of a TDR loan, the borrower has made the required consecutive loan payments. A nonaccrual commercial loan is returned to accrual status once the loan has been current for a minimum of six months, all fees and interest are paid current, the loan has a sufficient debt service coverage ratio, and the loan is well secured and within policy.

Impaired loans - A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized in the period collected unless the ultimate collection of principal is considered ~~doubtful. Loans reported~~doubtful, in which case interest income is no longer recognized.

Acquired loans - Acquired loans are initially recorded at fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation methodology that considers, among other things, interest rates, projected prepayments, projected default rates, loss given default and recovery rates, with no carryover of any existing ACL. Acquired loans with evidence of credit quality deterioration at acquisition are reviewed to determine if it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect all contractual amounts due, including both principal and interest. When both conditions exist, such loans are categorized and accounted for as purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loans. When these conditions do not exist, the loans ~~include~~are categorized as non-PCI loans.

For PCI loans ~~partially charged-off and TDRs.~~with cash flows that the Company has determined can be reasonably estimated, which is the majority of the PCI loans, interest income is recognized on a level-yield basis over the life of the loan based upon the excess of expected cash flows over the original investment in the loan.

Allowance for Credit Losses - The ACL represents management's best estimate of the amount of inherent losses in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. It involves a high degree of complexity and requires management to make difficult and subjective judgments and assumptions about highly uncertain matters. Management's methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the ACL consists of a formula analysis model, along with analyzing and considering several other relevant internal and external ~~data elements.~~factors. The use of different judgments and assumptions could cause reported results to differ significantly. Management maintains the ACL through provisions for credit losses that are either charged or credited to income.

One- to four-family loans, including home equity loans, are individually evaluated for loss when the loan is generally 180 days delinquent and any losses are charged-off. Losses are based on new collateral values obtained through appraisals, less estimated costs to sell. Anticipated private mortgage insurance proceeds are taken into consideration when calculating the loss amount. An updated appraisal is requested, at a minimum, every 12 months thereafter if the loan is 180 days or more delinquent or in foreclosure. If the Bank holds the first and second mortgage, both loans are combined when evaluating whether there is a potential loss on the loan. ~~For commercial real estate loans, losses are charged-off when the collection of such amounts is determined to be unlikely.~~ When a non-real estate secured ~~loan, which includes~~ consumer ~~loans - other,~~loan is 120 days delinquent, any identified losses are charged-off. For commercial loans, generally losses are charged-off prior to a loan becoming 120 days delinquent when it is determined, through the analysis of any available current financial information with regards to the borrower, that the borrower is not able to service the debt and there is little or no prospect for near term improvement, or, in the case of secured loans, it is determined, through the analysis of current information with regards to the Bank's collateral position, that the amounts due from the borrower are in excess of the calculated current fair value of the collateral after

consideration of estimated costs to sell. Charge-offs for any loan type may also occur at any time if the Bank has knowledge of the existence of a ~~potential~~probable loss.

The primary risk characteristics inherent in the one- to four-family and consumer loan portfolios are a decline in economic conditions, elevated levels of unemployment or underemployment, and declines in residential real estate values. Any one or a combination of these events may adversely affect ~~borrowers'~~the ability of borrowers to repay their loans, resulting in increased delinquencies, non-performing assets, loan losses, and future loan loss provisions. Although the commercial ~~real estate~~ loan portfolio is subject to the same risk of declines in economic conditions, the primary risk characteristics inherent in this portfolio include the ability of the borrower to sustain sufficient cash flows from leases and business operations, the ability to control operational or business expenses to satisfy their contractual debt payments, ~~and/or~~and the ability to utilize personal ~~and/~~or business resources to pay their contractual debt payments if the cash flows are not sufficient. Additionally, if the Bank were to repossess the secured collateral of a commercial real estate loan, the pool of potential buyers is ~~typically~~more limited ~~more~~ than that for a residential property. ~~This increases the risk that~~Therefore, the Bank could hold the property for an extended period of time, ~~and/~~or ~~potentially~~ be forced to sell at a discounted price, resulting in additional losses. Our commercial and industrial loans are primarily secured by accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, which may be difficult to appraise, may be illiquid and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.

~~Each~~As of each quarter end, a formula analysis is prepared which segregates the loan portfolio into categories based on certain risk characteristics. The categories include the following: one- to four-family loans; commercial ~~real estate~~ loans; consumer home equity loans; and other consumer loans. Home equity loans with the same underlying collateral as a one- to four-family loan are combined with the one- to four-family loan in the formula analysis model to calculate a combined loan-to-value ("LTV") ratio. The one- to four-family loan portfolio and related home equity loans are segregated into additional categories based on the following risk characteristics: loan source (originated, correspondent purchased, or bulk purchased), interest payments (fixed-rate and adjustable-rate), LTV ratios, borrower's credit scores, and ~~certain~~ geographic ~~locations.~~location. The categories were derived by management based on reviewing the historical performance of the one- to four-family loan portfolio and taking into consideration current economic conditions, such as trends in residential real estate values in certain areas of the U.S. and unemployment rates. The commercial loan portfolio is segregated into additional categories based on the type of loan (real estate loan, construction loan or commercial and industrial). Impaired loans are not included in the formula analysis as they are individually evaluated for loss.

Historical loss factors are applied to each loan category in the formula analysis model. ~~Each~~As of each quarter end, management reviews historical losses over a look-back time period and utilizes the historical loss time periods believed to be the most appropriate considering the ~~current~~then-current economic conditions. The historical loss time period is then adjusted for a loss emergence time period, which represents the estimated time period from the date of a loss event to the date we recognize a charge-off/loss. Qualitative ~~loss~~ factors are utilized in the formula analysis model to reflect risks inherent in each loan category that are not captured by the historical loss factors. The qualitative ~~loss~~ factors for one- to four-family and consumer loan portfolios take into consideration such items as: unemployment rate trends, residential real estate value trends, credit score trends, and delinquent loan ~~trends, and industry and peer charge-off information.~~trends. The qualitative ~~loss~~ factors for the commercial ~~real estate~~ loan portfolio take into consideration the composition of the portfolio along with industry and peer charge-off information and certain ACL ratios. As loans are classified or become delinquent, the qualitative loss factors increase for each respective loan category. The qualitative ~~loss~~ factors were derived by management based on a review of the historical performance of the respective loan portfolios and industry and peer information for those loan portfolios with no or limited historical loss experience, along with consideration of current economic conditions and the likely impact such conditions might have toon the performance of the loan portfolio.

Management ~~utilizes~~increased the historical loss and qualitative factors for the one- to four-family and consumer loan portfolios during the current fiscal year to account for a higher level of estimated inherent losses in the loan portfolio as a result of the deterioration of economic conditions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. When determining the appropriate historical loss and qualitative factors for the one- to four-family and consumer loan portfolios, management took into consideration such factors as the national and state unemployment rates and related trends, national and state unemployment benefit claim levels and related trends, the amount of and timing of financial assistance provided by the government, and the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program. Unemployed individuals benefited from additional unemployment benefits afforded under the CARES Act; however, the majority of the financial assistance provided by the federal government, which may be masking the Bank's actual credit exposure, tapered off significantly by September 30, 2020. In late March 2020, the Bank began offering a COVID-19 loan modification program for one- to four-family and consumer loans. While the intention of the COVID-19 loan modification program was to keep customers current on their payments and therefore in their homes during

the worst of the economic downturn, the program could be masking the Bank's actual credit exposure on these loans. After considering the factors noted above, management evaluated the Bank's historical ACL to loans ratios compared to historical unemployment rates and housing price index trends and the Bank's historical charge-off percentages. After reviewing historical information and considering the economic conditions at September 30, 2020, management selected the worst historical time periods and used those historical loss and qualitative factors in the ACL formula analysis model at September 30, 2020. Management then compared the ACL (calculated by the formula analysis ~~model,~~model) to loans ratio to the Bank's historical ACL to loan ratios to determine the appropriate amount of ACL at September 30, 2020 considering the economic conditions at that point in time.

Management also increased the qualitative factors and applied a COVID-19 qualitative factor to the Bank's commercial loan portfolio at September 30, 2020. To determine the appropriate qualitative factors for the Bank's commercial loan portfolio at September 30, 2020, management considered the factors noted above, along with ~~analyzing~~such factors as consumer spending levels and ~~considering several other relevant internal and external data elements when evaluating~~trends, industries significantly impacted by the ~~adequacy~~COVID-19 pandemic, the commercial lending team's review of the ~~ACL. Such data elements include~~Bank's largest commercial loan relationships, and the ~~trend~~Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program. The Bank's commercial lending team's loan analysis through September 30, 2020 primarily focused on the lending relationships considered most at risk of short-term operational cash flow issues and/or collateral concerns. Those considered most at risk were among the categories with the highest usage of the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program. We believe the Bank's COVID-19 loan modification program has been very beneficial to the majority of the Bank's borrowers that took advantage of the program; however, as is the case with one- to four-family loans, the modifications may be masking the Bank's actual credit exposure. The commercial lending team also considered the largest credits and ~~composition of delinquent~~LTVs for loans and non-performing loans, trends in foreclosed property and short sale transactions and charge-off activity, the current status and trends of local and national employment levels, trends and current conditions in the ~~housing markets,~~industries most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. After considering the factors noted above and the very limited historical loan ~~growth and concentrations, industry~~loss experience for the Bank's commercial loan portfolio, management reviewed historical peer ACL to loan ratios and peer charge-off percentages and ~~ACL~~the economic conditions during those time periods. After reviewing peer historical information and ~~certain~~considering the economic conditions at September 30, 2020, management increased the commercial loan qualitative factors and applied a COVID-19 qualitative factor. Management then compared the ACL ~~ratios such as~~(calculated by the formula analysis model) to loans ratio to peer historical ACL to loan ratios to determine the appropriate amount of ACL at September 30, 2020 considering the economic conditions at that point in time.

For non-PCI loans, ~~receivable, net~~the Company estimates a hypothetical amount of ACL using the same historical loss and ~~annualized historical losses. Since~~qualitative factors as the Bank's formula analysis model to establish the hypothetical amount of ACL. This amount is compared with the remaining net purchase discount for the non-PCI loans to test for credit quality deterioration and the possible need for an additional loan ~~portfolio~~loss provision. To the extent the remaining net purchase discount of the pool is ~~primarily concentrated~~greater than the hypothetical ACL, no additional ACL is necessary. If the remaining net purchase discount of the pool is less than the hypothetical ACL, the difference results in ~~one-~~an increase to ~~four-family real estate, management monitors residential real estate market value trends~~the ACL recorded through a provision for credit losses.

Management will continue to closely monitor economic conditions and will work with borrowers as necessary to assist them through this challenging economic climate. If economic conditions worsen or do not improve in the ~~Bank's local market areas~~near term, and geographic sections of the U.S. by reference to various industry and market reports, economic releases and surveys, and management's general and specific knowledge of the real estate markets in which the Bank lends, in order to determine what impact,if future government programs, if any, such trends may have on the level of ACL. Reviewing these data elements assists management in evaluating the overall credit quality of the loan portfolio and the reasonableness of the ACL on an ongoing basis, and whether changes needdo not provide adequate relief to ~~be made to~~borrowers, it is possible the Bank's ACL ~~methodology.~~will need to increase in future periods. Management seeks to apply the ACL methodology in a consistent manner; however, the methodology ~~can~~may be modified in response to changing ~~conditions.~~conditions, such as was the case during the current fiscal year. Although management believes the ACL was at a level adequate to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio at September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the level of the ACL remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term changes.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock - As a member of FHLB, ~~Topeka,~~ the Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of FHLB stock. The Bank's holding requirement varies based on the Bank's activities, primarily the Bank's outstanding borrowings, with FHLB. FHLB stock is carried at cost and is considered a restricted asset because it cannot be pledged as collateral or bought or sold on the open market and it also has certain redemption restrictions. Management conducts a quarterly evaluation to determine if any FHLB stock impairment exists. The quarterly impairment evaluation focuses primarily on the capital adequacy and liquidity of FHLB, while also considering the impact that legislative and regulatory developments may have on FHLB. Stock and cash dividends received on FHLB stock are reflected as dividend income in the consolidated statements of income.

Premises and Equipment - Land is carried at cost. Buildings, leasehold improvements, and furniture, fixtures and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and leasehold amortization. Buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Buildings have an estimated useful life of 39 years. Structural components of the buildings generally have an estimated life of 15 years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment have an estimated useful life of three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the

shorter of their estimated useful lives or the term of the respective ~~leases, which is generally three to 15 years.~~leases. The costs for major improvements and renovations are capitalized, while maintenance, repairs and minor improvements are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Gains and losses on dispositions are recorded as non-interest income or non-interest expense as incurred.

Revenue Recognition - Non-interest income within the scope of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 606 is recognized by the Company when performance obligations, under the terms of the contract, are satisfied. This income is measured as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for the providing of services. The majority of the Company's applicable non-interest income continues to be recognized at the time when services are provided to its customers. See Note 17. Revenue Recognition for additional information.

Leases - The Company leases real estate property for branches, ATMs, and certain equipment. All of the leases in which the Company is the lessee are classified as operating leases. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception and if the lease is an operating lease or a finance lease.

Operating lease right-of-use assets represent the Company's right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and operating lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. The right-of-use assets associated with operating leases are recorded in other assets in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The lease liabilities associated with operating leases are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. The period over which the right-of-use asset is amortized is generally the lesser of the expected remaining term or the remaining useful life of the leased asset. The lease liability is decreased as periodic lease payments are made. The Company performs impairment assessments for right-of-use assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable.

The calculated amounts of the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are impacted by the length of the lease term and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the minimum remaining lease payments. The Company's lease agreements often include one or more options to renew at the Company's discretion. If, at lease inception, the Company considers the exercising of a renewal option to be reasonably certain, the Company includes the extended term in the calculation of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. Generally, the Company cannot practically determine the interest rate implicit in the lease so the Company's incremental borrowing rate is used as the discount rate for the lease. The Company uses FHLB advance interest rates, which have been deemed as the Company's incremental borrowing rate, at lease inception based upon the term of the lease. For operating leases existing prior to October 1, 2019, the rate for the remaining lease term as of October 1, 2019 was applied. The Company's lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

Lease expense, variable lease expense and short-term lease expense are included in occupancy expense in the Company's consolidated statements of income. For facility-related leases, the Company elected, by lease class, to not separate lease and non-lease components. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease expense primarily represents payments such as common area maintenance, real estate taxes, and utilities and are recognized as expense in the period when those payments are incurred. Short-term lease expense relates to leases with an initial term of 12 months or less. The Company has elected to not record a right-of-use asset or lease liability for short-term leases.

Other Assets - Included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet are the Company's intangible assets, recognized as a result of the acquisition of CCB, which consist of goodwill, deposit intangibles and other intangibles.

Goodwill is assessed for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently in certain circumstances. The test for impairment is performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying amount, an impairment is recorded.

The Company's intangible assets primarily relate to core deposits. These intangible assets are amortized based upon the expected economic benefit over an estimated life of approximately 8 years and are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances change.

Income Taxes - The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax expense

(benefit) represents the change in deferred income tax assets and liabilities excluding the tax effects of the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on AFS securities and interest rate swaps and changes in the market value of restricted stock awards between the grant date and vesting date. Income tax related penalties and interest, if any, are included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. ~~Certain tax benefits attributable to stock options and restricted stock are credited to additional paid-in capital.~~ To the extent that management considers it more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be recovered, a valuation allowance is recorded. All positive and negative evidence is reviewed in determining how much of a valuation allowance is recognized on a quarterly basis.

Certain accounting literature prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of an uncertain tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included within the related tax liabilities line in the consolidated balance sheet.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan - The funds borrowed by the ESOP from the Company to purchase the Company's common stock are being repaid from dividends paid on unallocated ESOP shares and, if necessary, contributions by the Bank. The ESOP shares pledged as collateral are reported as a reduction of stockholders' equity at cost. As ESOP shares are committed to be released from collateral each quarter, the Company records compensation expense based on the average market price of the Company's stock during the quarter. Additionally, the ESOP shares become outstanding for EPS computations once they are committed to be released. ~~The eligibility criteria for participation in the Company's ESOP is a minimum of one year of service, at least age 21, and at least 1,000 hours of employment in each plan year.~~

Stock-based Compensation - The Company has share-based plans under which stock options and restricted stock awards have been granted. Compensation expense is recognized over the service period of the share-based payment award. The Company utilizes a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for the share-based payment ~~transactions with employees, except for equity instruments held by the ESOP.~~transactions. The Company applies the modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized over the service period for all awards granted.

Borrowed Funds - The Bank has entered into repurchase agreements, which are sales of securities under agreements to repurchase, with approved counterparties. These agreements are recorded as financing transactions, and thereby reported as liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet, with the related expense reported as interest expense on the consolidated statements of income, as the Bank maintains effective control over the transferred securities and the securities continue to be carried in the Bank's securities portfolio.

The Bank has obtained borrowings from FHLB in the form of advances and a line of credit. Total FHLB borrowings are secured by certain qualifying loans pursuant to a blanket collateral agreement with FHLB and certain securities, as necessary. Additionally, the Bank is authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank's "discount window."

The Company uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy to hedge the variable cash outflows associated with certain borrowings. Interest rate swaps are carried at fair value in the Company's consolidated financial statements. For interest rate swaps that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of such agreements are recorded in AOCI and are subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the period that interest on the borrowings affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the interest rate swap is recognized directly in earnings. Effectiveness is assessed using regression analysis. At the inception of a hedge, the Company documents certain items, including the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, the risk management objective and the nature of the risk being hedged, a description of how effectiveness will be measured and an evaluation of hedged transaction effectiveness.

Segment Information - As a community-oriented financial institution, substantially all of the Bank's operations involve the delivery of loan and deposit products to customers. Management makes operating decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of these community banking operations, which constitute the Company's only operating segment for financial reporting purposes.

100

Low Income Housing Partnerships - As part of the Bank's community reinvestment initiatives, the Bank invests in affordable housing limited partnerships ("low income housing partnerships") that make equity investments in affordable housing properties. The Bank is a limited partner in each partnership in which it invests. A separate, unrelated third party is the general partner. The Bank receives affordable housing tax credits and other tax benefits for these investments. Previously, the Bank accounted for low income housing partnerships using the equity method of accounting as two of the Bank's officers were involved in the operational management of the low income housing partnership investment group. Effective September 30, 2016, those two Bank officers discontinued their involvement in the operational management of the investment group. The Bank started using the proportional method of accounting for its low income housing partnership investments on October 1, 2016. See "Note 6. Low Income Housing Partnerships" for additional information.

Earnings Per Share - Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock (such as stock options) were exercised or resulted in the issuance of common stock. These potentially dilutive shares would then be included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period using the treasury stock method. Shares issued and shares reacquired during any period are weighted for the portion of the period that they were outstanding.

In computing both basic and diluted EPS, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding includes the ESOP shares previously allocated to participants and shares committed to be released for allocation to participants and shares of restricted stock ~~shares~~ which have ~~vested or have been allocated to participants.~~vested. ESOP shares that have not been committed to be released are excluded from the computation of basic and diluted EPS. Unvested restricted stock awards contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends and are treated as participating securities in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method.

~~Comprehensive Income~~Trust Asset Management - ~~Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities and changes~~Assets (other than cash deposits with the Bank) held in fiduciary or agency capacities for customers are not included in the ~~accumulated gains/losses on effective cash flow hedging instruments, net~~accompanying consolidated balance sheets, since such items are not assets of ~~taxes.~~the Company or its subsidiaries.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - In ~~May 2014,~~February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ~~Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~ASU 2016-02, Leases. The ASU, as amended, ~~implements a common revenue standard that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue.~~ The core principle of the amended guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, the amended guidance identifies specific steps an entity should apply in order to achieve this principle. The amended guidance ~~requires entities to disclose both quantitative and qualitative information regarding contracts with customers.~~ ASU 2014-09 will become effective for the Company on October 1, 2018. The majority of the Company's revenue is composed of interest income from loans and securities which are explicitly excluded from the amended ASU; therefore the amended ASU will likely not have a material impact to the Company's consolidated financial condition and results of operations, but it will likely result in expanded disclosures. The Company's evaluation of the amended ASU and its impact on components of non-interest income is ongoing.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,~~ ~~Financial Instruments, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities~~. The ASU supersedes certain accounting guidance related to equity securities with readily determinable fair values and the related impairment assessment. An entity's equity investments that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or result in consolidation of an investee are not included within the scope of this ASU. The ASU requires public business entities to utilize the exit price notation in determining fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The ASU requires additional reporting in other comprehensive income for financial liabilities measured at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. The ASU also requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balances or in the notes to the financial statements. ASU 2016-01 will become effective for the Company on October 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU may have on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations and disclosures.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases. The ASU amends~~revises lease accounting guidance by requiring that lessees recognize the assets and liabilities arising from leases on the balance sheet. Additionally, the ASU requires entities to disclose both quantitative and qualitative information regarding their leasing activities. The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under the previous guidance. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-02 will become~~2018-11, Leases, which provides entities with relief from the costs of implementation by allowing the option to not restate comparative periods as part of the transition. The ASU, as amended, became effective for the Company on October 1, 2019. Upon adoption, the Company elected the modified retrospective approach and the optional transition method under which the Company used the effective date as the date of initial application of the amendments. The optional practical expedients the Company ~~is currently in~~elected include: (1) not reassessing whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (2) not reassessing the ~~process~~classification of ~~accumulating~~any expired or existing contracts, (3) not reassessing initial direct costs for existing leases, and (4) using hindsight for leases existing at adoption date. For leases with an initial term of 12 months or less, the Company elected the short-term lease ~~data and developing an inventory of leases. The Company expects to recognize~~option, which entails not recognizing right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for ~~substantially all~~these leases. Additionally, the Company elected, for facility-related leases, the practical expedient that allows an entity to elect, by lease class, the ability to not separate lease and non-lease components. Upon adoption, the Company recognized a right-of-use asset of ~~its~~$15.7 million and a lease liability of $15.5 million, related to the Company's non-cancellable operating lease commitments based on the present value of ~~unpaid~~the expected remaining lease payments as of ~~the date of adoption. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact this ASU may have on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations and disclosures.~~

~~In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,~~ ~~Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting~~. The ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, along with simplifying the classification in the statement of cash flows. The ASU became effective for the Company on October 1, ~~2017. Upon~~2019. The cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the time of adoption the Company elected to account for forfeitures of stock-based compensation awards when they occur. The Company will recognize excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income and present them within operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. This ASUtotaled $88 thousand. These ASUs did not have a material impact on the Company's ~~consolidated financial condition or~~ results of operations and cash flows at the time of adoption. ~~However,~~The disclosures required by the ~~impact of tax benefits and the timing of their recognition within income tax expense is unpredictable, as these benefits~~ASU are ~~recognized primarily as a result of stock options being exercised.~~included in Note 18. Leases.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The ASU, as amended, replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP, which requires credit losses to be recognized when it is probable that a loss has been incurred, with a new impairment methodology. The new impairment methodology requires an entity to measure, at each reporting date, the expected credit losses of financial assets not measured at fair value, such as loans ~~HTM debt securities,~~ and loan commitments, over their contractual lives. Under the new impairment methodology, expected credit losses will be measured at each reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Additionally, the ASU amends the current credit loss measurements for AFS debt securities. Credit losses related to AFS debt securities will be recorded through the ACL rather than as a direct write-down as per current GAAP. The ASU also requires enhanced disclosures related to credit quality and significant estimates and judgments used by management when estimating credit losses. The ASU will become effective for the Company on October 1, 2020. The Company intends to apply a modified retrospective approach when adopting the ASU. Upon adoption, a cumulative-effect adjustment for the change in the allowance for credit losses and reserves on unfunded commitments will be recognized in retained earnings, net of tax. The Company worked with a software provider on the

101

application and implementation of the new accounting guidance. The Company has determined its loan segmentation and the methodologies that will be utilized for each loan segment, and has also developed ~~an implementation plan~~several assumptions including a reasonable and supportable forecast time period, a reversion methodology, and prepayment and curtailment speeds, among others. Management is in the process of ~~reviewing~~finalizing supporting documentation and ~~assessing its processes~~internal controls, policies, and ~~systems~~procedures. Based on analysis performed by the Company with consideration given to the loan portfolio at September 30, 2020 and ~~identifying~~current expectation of future economic conditions, our ACL and reserves on unfunded commitments upon adoption will be $26.8 million and $7.8 million, respectively, which would result in a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, net of tax, of $2.3 million. However, management continues to evaluate the ~~necessary data~~impact of adoption. The preliminary results may change as the model is finalized and the remaining implementation steps are completed. The enhanced disclosures required by this ASU will be presented beginning with the Company's December 31, 2020 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Under this new accounting standard, the Company's ACL may fluctuate more significantly from period to ~~implement~~period than it has historically as a result of changes in forecasted economic conditions and changes in the ~~ASU.~~composition of the Company's loan portfolio.

In August ~~2017,~~2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~2017-12,~~ ~~Derivatives~~2018-13, Fair Value Measurement: Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosures Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This ASU eliminates, modifies and ~~Hedging: Target Improvements~~adds certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The ASU adds disclosure requirements for the changes in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The effective date of this ASU for the Company is October 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Entities are allowed to elect early adoption of the eliminated or modified disclosure requirements and delay adoption of the new disclosure requirements until their effective date. Since this ASU only requires disclosure changes, it is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software: Customer's Accounting for ~~Hedging Activities~~Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The ASU ~~amends~~aligns the ~~hedge accounting recognition and presentation~~ requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in ~~current GAAP.~~a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include internal-use software license). The ~~purpose~~effective date of ~~the~~this ASU ~~was to improve transparency of hedging relationships in the financial statements and to reduce the complexity of applying hedge accounting for preparers. The ASU will become effective~~ for the Company onis October 1, ~~2019. The Company~~2020, with early adoption permitted. This ASU is ~~currently evaluating the effect of the ASU~~not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations and disclosures.

In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments. This ASU makes clarifications and corrections to the application of the guidance contained in each of the amended topics. According to the provisions of the ASU, entities that have not adopted ASU 2017-12 prior to the issuance of ASU 2019-04 shall adopt the provisions of both ASUs at the same time. The effective date of the non-hedging amendments contained in ASU 2019-04 for the Company is October 1, 2020. The non-hedging amendments contained in this ASU are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations and disclosures.

2.ACQUISITION

On August 31, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of CCB and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Capital City Bank. Capital City Bank was headquartered in Topeka, Kansas and owned and leased banking locations in Topeka, Lawrence, and Overland Park, Kansas.The acquisition was not considered material to the Company's financial statements; therefore, pro-forma financial data and related disclosures are not included.

The Company acquired loans and deposits with fair values of $299.7 million and $352.5 million, respectively, at the date of acquisition. Included in the loans acquired from CCB at August 31, 2018 were PCI loans with contractually required cash flows totaling $2.6 million. Of that amount, the Company expected to collect $1.9 million, which was also the fair value at the date of acquisition. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, the Company issued 3.0 million shares of common stock for all outstanding shares of CCB capital stock, for a total merger consideration of $39.1 million, based on the Company's closing stock price of $13.21 on August 31, 2018. See "Note 8. Intangible Assets" for additional information regarding the acquisition of CCB.

102

There were 0 merger-related expenses incurred during fiscal year 2020. During fiscal years 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred $30 thousand and $872 thousand, respectively, of pre-tax merger-related expenses attributable to the CCB acquisition. The merger-related expenses were reflected on the Company's consolidated statement of income and were reported primarily in regulatory and outside services.

3.EARNINGS PER SHARE

Shares acquired by the ESOP are not ~~considered~~included in ~~the~~ basic average shares outstanding until the shares are committed for allocation or vested to an employee's individual account. Unvested shares awarded pursuant to the Company's restricted stock benefit plans are treated as participating securities in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method as they contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends. The two-class method is an earnings allocation that determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating security.


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2018
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income	$	64,540	$	94,243	$	98,927
Income allocated to participating securities	(52)		(55)		(40)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	64,488	$	94,188	$	98,887

Average common shares outstanding	137,834,304		137,614,465		134,635,886
Average committed ESOP shares outstanding	62,400		62,458		62,458
Total basic average common shares outstanding	137,896,704		137,676,923		134,698,344

Effect of dilutive stock options	4,484		58,478		60,647

Total diluted average common shares outstanding	137,901,188		137,735,401		134,758,991

Net EPS:
Basic	$	0.47	$	0.68	$	0.73
Diluted	$	0.47	$	0.68	$	0.73

Antidilutive stock options, excluded from the diluted average
common shares outstanding calculation	437,731		470,938		541,418

103

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income $ 84,137
$ 83,494
$ 78,093
Income allocated to participating securities (44 ) (66 ) (116 )
Net income available to common stockholders $ 84,093
$ 83,428
$ 77,977

Average common shares outstanding 134,019,962
132,982,815
135,321,235
Average committed ESOP shares outstanding 62,458
62,400
62,458
Total basic average common shares outstanding 134,082,420
133,045,215
135,383,693

Effect of dilutive stock options 161,442
131,161
24,810

Total diluted average common shares outstanding 134,243,862
133,176,376
135,408,503

Net EPS:
Basic $ 0.63
$ 0.63
$ 0.58
Diluted $ 0.63
$ 0.63
$ 0.58

Antidilutive stock options, excluded from the diluted average
common shares outstanding calculation 200,800
886,417
1,248,744

4.SECURITIES

The following tables reflect the amortized cost, estimated fair value, and gross unrealized gains and losses of AFS ~~and HTM~~ securities at the dates presented. The majority of the MBS and investment securities portfolios are composed of securities issued by GSEs.


	September 30, 2020
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
	(Dollars in thousands)

MBS	$	1,149,922	$	31,212	$	331	$	1,180,803
GSE debentures	369,967		414		41		370,340

Municipal bonds	9,716		91		0		9,807
	$	1,529,605	$	31,717	$	372	$	1,560,950

September 30, 2017
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures $ 271,300
$ 16
$ 587
$ 270,729
MBS 135,644
5,923
51
141,516
Trust preferred securities 2,067
—
16
2,051
Municipal bonds 1,530
5
—
1,535
$ 410,541
$ 5,944
$ 654
$ 415,831
HTM:
MBS $ 800,931
$ 10,460
$ 5,295
$ 806,096
Municipal bonds 26,807
119
13
26,913
$ 827,738
$ 10,579
$ 5,308
$ 833,009


	September 30, 2019
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
	(Dollars in thousands)

MBS	$	923,256	$	15,571	$	2,340	$	936,487
GSE debentures	249,828		304		178		249,954

Municipal bonds	18,371		52		1		18,422
	$	1,191,455	$	15,927	$	2,519	$	1,204,863

104

September 30, 2016
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures $ 346,226
$ 815
$ 3
$ 347,038
MBS 169,442
9,069
4
178,507
Trust preferred securities 2,123
—
367
1,756
$ 517,791
$ 9,884
$ 374
$ 527,301
HTM:
MBS $ 1,067,571
$ 22,862
$ 1,219
$ 1,089,214
Municipal bonds 33,303
357
7
33,653
$ 1,100,874
$ 23,219
$ 1,226
$ 1,122,867

The following tables summarize the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of those AFS securities on which an unrealized loss at the dates presented was reported and the continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and equal to or greater than 12 months as of the dates presented.


	September 30, 2020
	Less Than 12 Months				Equal to or Greater Than 12 Months
	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
	(Dollars in thousands)

MBS	$	207,071	$	330	$	118	$	1
GSE debentures	74,959		41		0		0

Municipal bonds	0		0		0		0
	$	282,030	$	371	$	118	$	1

September 30, 2017
Less Than 12 Months Equal to or Greater Than 12 Months
Estimated Unrealized Estimated Unrealized
Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures $ 224,421
$ 539
$ 24,952
$ 48
MBS 9,648
46
673
5
Trust preferred securities —
—
2,051
16
$ 234,069
$ 585
$ 27,676
$ 69

HTM:
MBS $ 259,200
$ 1,582
$ 201,094
$ 3,713
Municipal bonds 5,638
8
1,460
5
$ 264,838
$ 1,590
$ 202,554
$ 3,718


	September 30, 2019
	Less Than 12 Months				Equal to or Greater Than 12 Months
	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
	(Dollars in thousands)

MBS	$	111,368	$	126	$	199,442	$	2,214
GSE debentures	0		0		74,812		178

Municipal bonds	1,755		1		0		0
	$	113,123	$	127	$	274,254	$	2,392

September 30, 2016
Less Than 12 Months Equal to or Greater Than 12 Months
Estimated Unrealized Estimated Unrealized
Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures $ 24,997
$ 3
$ —
$ —
MBS —
—
654
4
Trust preferred securities —
—
1,756
367
$ 24,997
$ 3
$ 2,410
$ 371

HTM:
MBS $ 147,930
$ 538
$ 66,646
$ 681
Municipal bonds 4,771
6
391
1
$ 152,701
$ 544
$ 67,037
$ 682

The unrealized losses at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019 were ~~primarily~~ a result of an increase in market yields from the time the securities were purchased. In general, as market yields rise, the fair value of securities will decrease; as market yields fall, the fair value of securities will increase. Management generally views changes in fair value caused by changes in ~~interest rates~~market yields as ~~temporary; therefore,~~temporary. Therefore, these securities have not been classified as other-than-temporarily impaired. The impairment is also considered temporary because scheduled coupon payments have been made, it is anticipated that the entire principal balance will be collected as scheduled, and management neither intends to sell the securities, nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before the recovery of the remaining amortized cost amount, which could be at maturity. As a result of the analysis, management has concluded that no0 other-than-temporary impairments existed at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 or ~~2016.~~2019. See "Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Securities" for additional information regarding our impairment review and classification process for securities.

105

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of AFS debt securities as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual principal repayments may differ from contractual maturities due to prepayment or early call privileges by the issuer. In the case of MBS, borrowers on the underlying loans generally have the right to prepay their loans without prepayment penalty. For this reason, MBS are not included in the maturity categories.



	Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
One year or less	$	3,987	$	4,009
One year through five years	375,696		376,138


	379,683		380,147
MBS	1,149,922		1,180,803
	$	1,529,605	$	1,560,950

AFS HTM
Amortized Estimated Amortized Estimated
Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
One year or less $ 121,340
$ 121,253
$ 6,141
$ 6,156
One year through five years 151,490
151,011
20,448
20,534
Five years through ten years —
—
218
223
Ten years and thereafter 2,067
2,051
—
—
274,897
274,315
26,807
26,913
MBS 135,644
141,516
800,931
806,096
$ 410,541
$ 415,831
$ 827,738
$ 833,009

The following table presents the taxable and non-taxable components of interest income on investment securities for the periods presented.


	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2018
	(Dollars in thousands)
Taxable	$	4,242	$	6,020	$	4,275
Non-taxable	225		346		395
	$	4,467	$	6,366	$	4,670

For the Year Ended September 30,
2017
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
Taxable $ 3,847
$ 5,255
$ 6,431
Non-taxable 515
670
751
$ 4,362
$ 5,925
$ 7,182

The following table summarizes the carrying value of securities pledged as collateral for the obligations indicated below as of the dates presented.


	September 30,
	2020		2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
Public unit deposits	$	330,986	$	381,143
FRB of Kansas City	259,851		6,636
Repurchase agreements	0		108,271

	$	590,837	$	496,050

September 30,
2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Public unit deposits $ 499,993
$ 419,282
Repurchase agreements 214,298
217,374
FRB of Kansas City 11,769
15,938
$ 726,060
$ 652,594

During fiscal year 2018, the Company sold trust preferred securities and received proceeds of $2.1 million. The Company recognized a gain of $9 thousand on the sale. All other dispositions of securities during fiscal years ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015~~2018 were the result of principal repayments, calls, or maturities.

106

5. LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

Loans receivable, net at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019 is summarized as follows:


	2020		2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	3,937,310	$	3,873,851
Correspondent purchased	2,101,082		2,349,877
Bulk purchased	208,427		252,347
Construction	34,593		36,758
Total	6,281,412		6,512,833
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	626,588		583,617
Commercial and industrial	97,614		61,094
Construction	105,458		123,159
Total	829,660		767,870


Consumer:
Home equity	103,838		120,587
Other	10,086		11,183
Total	113,924		131,770

Total loans receivable	7,224,996		7,412,473

Less:
ACL	31,527		9,226
Discounts/unearned loan fees	29,190		31,058
Premiums/deferred costs	(38,572)		(44,558)
	$	7,202,851	$	7,416,747

2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family:
Originated $ 3,959,232
$ 4,005,615
Correspondent purchased 2,445,311
2,206,072
Bulk purchased 351,705
416,653
Construction 30,647
39,430
Total 6,786,895
6,667,770
Commercial:
Permanent 183,030
110,768
Construction 86,952
43,375
Total 269,982
154,143
Total real estate loans 7,056,877
6,821,913

Consumer loans:
Home equity 122,066
123,345
Other 3,808
4,264
Total consumer loans 125,874
127,609

Total loans receivable 7,182,751
6,949,522

Less:
ACL 8,398
8,540
Discounts/unearned loan fees 24,962
24,933
Premiums/deferred costs (45,680 ) (41,975 )
$ 7,195,071
$ 6,958,024

Included in the loan portfolio at September 30, 2020 were $139.6 million of non-PCI loans and $5 thousand of PCI loans associated with the acquisition of CCB during fiscal year 2018. At September 30, 2020, the Company had $2.4 million of net purchase discounts related to non-PCI loans and $5 thousand related to PCI loans.

As of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, the Bank serviced loans for others aggregating ~~approximately $101.2~~$87.2 million and ~~$120.0~~$117.3 million, respectively. Such loans are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining escrow accounts, disbursing payments to investors and foreclosure processing. Loan servicing income includes servicing fees withheld from investors and certain charges collected from borrowers, such as late payment fees. The Bank held borrowers' escrow balances on loans serviced for others of ~~$2.1~~$1.7 million and ~~$2.4~~$2.2 million as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, respectively.

Lending Practices and Underwriting Standards - Originating and purchasing one- to four-family loans is the Bank's primary lending ~~business, resulting in a loan concentration in residential first mortgage loans. The Bank purchases one- to four-family loans, on a loan-by-loan basis, from a select group of correspondent lenders.~~business. The Bank also originates consumer loans primarily secured by one- to four-family residential properties and originates and participates in commercial ~~real estate~~ loans. AsThe Bank has a ~~result of our~~loan concentration in one- to four-family ~~lending activities, the Bank has~~loans and a geographic concentration of these loans ~~secured by real property located~~ in Kansas and Missouri.

One- to four-family loans - Full documentation to support an applicant's credit and income, and sufficient funds to cover all applicable fees and reserves at closing, are required on all loans. Generally, loans are ~~currently~~ underwritten according to the "ability to repay" and "qualified mortgage" standards, as issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Properties securing one- to four-family loans are appraised by either staff appraisers or fee appraisers, both of which are independent of the loan origination ~~function and approved by our Board of Directors.~~function.

107

The underwriting standards for loans purchased from correspondent ~~and nationwide~~ lenders are generally similar to the Bank's internal underwriting standards. The underwriting of loans purchased from correspondent lenders on a loan-by-loan basis is performed by the Bank's underwriters.

The Bank also originates owner-occupied construction-to-permanent loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate. ~~Construction loans are obtained by homeowners who will occupy the property when construction is complete. The Bank does not originate construction loans to builders for speculative purposes.~~ Construction draw requests and the supporting documentation are reviewed and approved by designated personnel. The Bank also performs regular documented inspections of the construction project to ensure the funds are being used for the intended purpose and the project is being completed according to the plans and specifications provided.

Commercial ~~real estate~~ loans - The Bank's commercial real estate and commercial construction loans are originated by the Bank or are in participation with a lead bank. When underwriting a commercial real estate or commercial construction loan, several factors are considered, such as the income producing potential of the property, cash equity provided by the borrower, the financial strength of the borrower, managerial expertise of the borrower or tenant, feasibility studies, lending experience with the borrower and the marketability of the property. For commercial real estate and commercial construction participation loans, the Bank performs the same underwriting procedures as if the loan was being originated by the Bank. At the time of origination, LTV ratios on commercial real estate loans generally do not exceed ~~80%~~85% of the appraised value of the property securing the loans and the minimum debt service coverage ratio is generally ~~1.25.~~1.15. For commercial construction loans, LTV ratios generally do not exceed 80% of the projected appraised value of the property securing the loans and the minimum debt service coverage ratio is generally 1.15, but it applies to the projected cash flows, and the borrower must have successful experience with the construction and operation of properties similar to the subject property. Appraisals on properties securing these loans are performed by independent state certified fee appraisers.

The Bank's commercial and industrial loans are generally made in the Bank's market areas and are underwritten on the basis of the borrower's ability to service the debt from income. With the exception of Paycheck Protection Program loans, working capital loans are primarily collateralized by short-term assets whereas term loans are primarily collateralized by long-term assets. In general, commercial and industrial loans involve more credit risk than commercial real estate loans due to the type of collateral securing these loans. As a result of these additional complexities, variables and risks, these loans require more thorough underwriting and servicing than other types of loans.

Consumer loans - The Bank offers a variety of secured consumer loans, including home equity loans and lines of credit, home improvement loans, ~~auto~~vehicle loans, and loans secured by ~~savings~~ deposits. The Bank also originates a very limited amount of unsecured loans. ~~The Bank does not originate any consumer loans on an indirect basis, such as contracts purchased from retailers of goods or services which have extended credit to their customers.~~ The majority of the consumer loan portfolio is comprised of home equity lines of credit for which the Bank also has the first mortgage or the home equity line of credit is in the first lien position.

The underwriting standards for consumer loans include a determination of an applicant's payment history on other debts and an assessment of an applicant's ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although creditworthiness of an applicant is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the security in relation to the proposed loan amount.

Credit Quality Indicators - Based on the Bank's lending emphasis and underwriting standards, management has segmented the loan portfolio into three segments: (1) one- to four-family; (2) consumer; and (3) ~~commercial real estate. The one- to four-family and consumer loan portfolios~~commercial. These segments are further ~~segmented~~divided into classes for purposes of providing disaggregated information about the credit quality of the loan portfolio. The classes are: one- to four-family - originated, one- to four-family - correspondent purchased, one- to four-family - bulk purchased, consumer - home equity, ~~and~~ consumer - ~~other. The one-~~other, commercial - commercial real estate, and commercial - commercial and industrial. One- to four-family -construction loans are included in either the originated class or correspondent purchased class, ~~was segregated from the one- to four-family originated class~~and commercial construction loans are included in the current fiscal year due to the size of the portfolio along with the loan product composition, geographic locations and inherent credit risks within the portfolio. The prior period information presented within this note has been conformed to the new loan class presentation.commercial real estate class.

The Bank's primary credit quality indicators for the one- to four-family and consumer - home equity loan portfolios are delinquency status, asset classifications, LTV ratios, and borrower credit scores. The Bank's primary credit quality indicators for the commercial ~~real estate~~ and consumer - other loan portfolios are delinquency status and asset classifications.

108

The following tables present the recorded investment, by class, in loans 30 to 89 days delinquent, loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure, total delinquent loans, current loans, and total recorded investment at the dates presented. The recorded investment in loans is defined as the unpaid principal balance of a loan, less charge-offs and inclusive of unearned loan fees and deferred costs. At September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, all loans 90 or more days delinquent were on nonaccrual status.


	September 30, 2020
			90 or More Days		Total				Total
	30 to 89 Days		Delinquent or		Delinquent		Current		Recorded
	Delinquent		in Foreclosure		Loans		Loans		Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	3,001	$	4,347	$	7,348	$	3,950,387	$	3,957,735
Correspondent purchased	3,170		2,433		5,603		2,122,085		2,127,688
Bulk purchased	2,558		2,938		5,496		203,844		209,340
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	40		1,206		1,246		728,191		729,437
Commercial and industrial	5		157		162		96,124		96,286
Consumer:
Home equity	323		296		619		103,210		103,829
Other	75		8		83		9,980		10,063
	$	9,172	$	11,385	$	20,557	$	7,213,821	$	7,234,378

September 30, 2017
90 or More Days Total Total
30 to 89 Days Delinquent or Delinquent Current Recorded
Delinquent in Foreclosure Loans Loans Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated $ 13,216
$ 5,500
$ 18,716
$ 3,956,598
$ 3,975,314
One- to four-family - correspondent 1,855
92
1,947
2,477,916
2,479,863
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 3,233
3,399
6,632
346,807
353,439
Commercial real estate —
—
—
268,979
268,979
Consumer - home equity 467
406
873
121,193
122,066
Consumer - other 33
4
37
3,771
3,808
$ 18,804
$ 9,401
$ 28,205
$ 7,175,264
$ 7,203,469


	September 30, 2019
			90 or More Days		Total				Total
	30 to 89 Days		Delinquent or		Delinquent		Current		Recorded
	Delinquent		in Foreclosure		Loans		Loans		Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	7,187	$	3,261	$	10,448	$	3,885,335	$	3,895,783
Correspondent purchased	2,762		1,023		3,785		2,377,629		2,381,414
Bulk purchased	3,624		1,484		5,108		248,376		253,484
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	762		0		762		702,377		703,139
Commercial and industrial	70		173		243		60,340		60,583
Consumer:
Home equity	446		302		748		119,688		120,436
Other	78		21		99		11,035		11,134
	$	14,929	$	6,264	$	21,193	$	7,404,780	$	7,425,973

September 30, 2016
90 or More Days Total Total
30 to 89 Days Delinquent or Delinquent Current Recorded
Delinquent in Foreclosure Loans Loans Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated $ 13,545
$ 8,153
$ 21,698
$ 4,007,012
$ 4,028,710
One- to four-family - correspondent 3,389
992
4,381
2,233,941
2,238,322
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 5,082
7,380
12,462
406,379
418,841
Commercial real estate —
—
—
153,082
153,082
Consumer - home equity 635
520
1,155
122,190
123,345
Consumer - other 62
9
71
4,193
4,264
$ 22,713
$ 17,054
$ 39,767
$ 6,926,797
$ 6,966,564

The recorded investment ofin mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process as of both September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019 was ~~$4.3~~$1.5 million, ~~and $5.7 million, respectively,~~ which is included in loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure in the table above. The carrying value of residential OREO held as a result of obtaining physical possession upon completion of a foreclosure or through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure was ~~$1.4 million~~$183 thousand at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~$2.5 million~~$745 thousand at September 30, ~~2016.~~2019.

109

The following table presents the recorded investment, by class, in loans classified as nonaccrual at the dates presented. The decrease in nonaccrual loans at September 30, 2017 compared to the prior year was due mainly to a decrease in loans 90 or more days delinquent, along with a decrease in loans reported as nonaccrual pursuant to regulatory reporting requirements.


	September 30,
	2020		2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	5,037	$	4,436
Correspondent purchased	2,433		1,023
Bulk purchased	2,938		1,551
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	1,663		0
Commercial and industrial	157		173
Consumer:
Home equity	305		337
Other	8		21
	$	12,541	$	7,541

September 30,
2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated $ 10,054
$ 17,086
One- to four-family - correspondent 1,804
3,788
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 4,264
7,411
Commercial real estate —
—
Consumer - home equity 519
848
Consumer - other 4
10
$ 16,645
$ 29,143

In accordance with the Bank's asset classification policy, management regularly reviews the problem loans in the Bank's portfolio to determine whether any loans require classification. Loan classifications are defined as follows:

•Special mention - These loans are performing loans on which known information about the collateral pledged or the possible credit problems of the borrower(s) have caused management to have doubts as to the ability of the borrower(s) to comply with present loan repayment terms and which may result in the future inclusion of such loans in the non-performing loan categories.

•Substandard - A loan is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard loans include those characterized by the distinct possibility the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

•Doubtful - Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts and conditions and values highly questionable and improbable.

•Loss - Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets on the books is not warranted.

The following table sets forth the recorded investment in loans classified as special mention or substandard, by class, at the dates presented. Special mention and substandard loans are included in the ACL formula analysis model if the loans are not individually evaluated for loss. Loans classified as doubtful or loss are individually evaluated for loss. At the dates presented, there were no0 loans classified as doubtful, and all loans classified as loss were fully charged-off.


	September 30,
	2020				2019
	Special Mention		Substandard		Special Mention		Substandard
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	9,249	$	15,729	$	12,941	$	15,628
Correspondent purchased	2,076		4,512		2,349		2,785
Bulk purchased	0		5,319		102		5,294
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	50,957		3,541		52,891		2,472
Commercial and industrial	1,040		1,368		1,215		3,057
Consumer:
Home equity	331		581		280		696
Other	0		8		2		24
	$	63,653	$	31,058	$	69,780	$	29,956

110

September 30,
2017 2016
Special Mention Substandard Special Mention Substandard
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated $ 7,031
$ 30,059
$ 10,242
$ 27,818
One- to four-family - correspondent 261
3,800
2,496
5,168
One- to four-family - bulk purchased —
8,005
1,156
11,480
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity 9
1,032
54
1,431
Consumer - other —
4
8
16
$ 7,301
$ 42,900
$ 13,956
$ 45,913

The following table shows the weighted average credit score and weighted average LTV for one- to four-family loans and consumer home equity loans at the dates presented. Borrower credit scores are intended to provide an indication as to the likelihood that a borrower will repay their debts. Credit scores are updated at least ~~semiannually,~~annually, with the last update in September ~~2017,~~2020, from a nationally recognized consumer rating agency. The LTV ratios provide an estimate of the extent to which the Bank may incur a loss on any given loan that may go into foreclosure. The consumer - home equity LTV does not take into account the first lien position, if applicable. The LTV ratios were based on the current loan balance and either the lesser of the purchase price or original appraisal, or the most recent Bank appraisal, if available. In most cases, the most recent appraisal was obtained at the time of origination.


	September 30,
	2020			2019
	Credit Score	LTV		Credit Score	LTV
One- to four-family - originated	771	62	%	768	62	%
One- to four-family - correspondent	765	64		765	65
One- to four-family - bulk purchased	767	60		762	61
Consumer - home equity	756	19		754	19
	769	62		766	62

September 30,
2017 2016
Credit Score LTV Credit Score LTV
One- to four-family - originated 767 63 % 766 63 %
One- to four-family - correspondent 764 68
764 68
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 757 63
753 64
Consumer - home equity 755 19
755 20
765 64
764 64

TDRs - The following tables present the recorded investment prior to restructuring and immediately after restructuring in all loans restructured during the periods presented. These tables do not reflect the recorded investment at the end of the periods indicated. Any increase in the recorded investment at the time of the restructuring was generally due to the capitalization of delinquent interest and/or escrow balances. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017, management refined its methodology for assessing whether a loan modification qualifies as a TDR which, though not being material, resulted in fewer loans being classified as TDRs.


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2020
	Number	Pre-		Post-
	of	Restructured		Restructured
	Contracts	Outstanding		Outstanding
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	5	$	241	$	242
Correspondent purchased	1	192		191
Bulk purchased	1	75		134
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	1	837		837
Commercial and industrial	1	1,683		1,709
Consumer:
Home equity	2	45		44
Other	0	0		0
	11	$	3,073	$	3,157

111

For the Year Ended September 30, 2017
Number Pre- Post-
of Restructured Restructured
Contracts Outstanding Outstanding
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated 112
$ 11,940
$ 12,402
One- to four-family - correspondent 12
2,443
2,459
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 3
1,031
1,048
Commercial real estate —
—
—
Consumer - home equity 17
368
380
Consumer - other —
—
—
144
$ 15,782
$ 16,289


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2019
	Number	Pre-		Post-
	of	Restructured		Restructured
	Contracts	Outstanding		Outstanding
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	3	$	385	$	386
Correspondent purchased	0	0		0
Bulk purchased	2	377		377
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	0	0		0
Commercial and industrial	0	0		0
Consumer:
Home equity	0	0		0
Other	0	0		0
	5	$	762	$	763

For the Year Ended September 30, 2016
Number Pre- Post-
of Restructured Restructured
Contracts Outstanding Outstanding
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated 122
$ 17,201
$ 17,557
One- to four-family - correspondent 12
2,592
2,619
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 3
596
594
Commercial real estate —
—
—
Consumer - home equity 19
427
433
Consumer - other 1
8
8
157
$ 20,824
$ 21,211

For the Year Ended September 30, 2015
Number Pre- Post-
of Restructured Restructured
Contracts Outstanding Outstanding
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated 141
$ 17,265
$ 17,468
One- to four-family - correspondent 2
546
542
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 4
1,140
1,144
Commercial real estate —
—
—
Consumer - home equity 22
479
485
Consumer - other 3
12
12
172
$ 19,442
$ 19,651


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
	Number	Pre-		Post-
	of	Restructured		Restructured
	Contracts	Outstanding		Outstanding
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	5	$	264	$	281
Correspondent purchased	2	406		406
Bulk purchased	0	0		0
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	0	0		0
Commercial and industrial	0	0		0
Consumer:
Home equity	0	0		0
Other	0	0		0
	7	$	670	$	687

The following table provides information on TDRs that became delinquent during the periods presented within 12 months after being restructured.


	For the Years Ended
	September 30, 2020			September 30, 2019			September 30, 2018
	Number of	Recorded		Number of	Recorded		Number of	Recorded
	Contracts	Investment		Contracts	Investment		Contracts	Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated	1	$	38	1	$	45	22	$	1,416
Correspondent purchased	0	0		0	0		1	124
Bulk purchased	1	134		0	0		3	1,040
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	—	0		0	0		0	0
Commercial and industrial	0	0		0	0		0	0
Consumer:
Home equity	1	9		0	0		4	133
Other	0	0		0	0		0	0
	3	$	181	1	$	45	30	$	2,713

112

For the Years Ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2015
Number of Recorded Number of Recorded Number of Recorded
Contracts Investment Contracts Investment Contracts Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated 46
$ 4,561
48
$ 5,330
49
$ 5,311
One- to four-family - correspondent 2
148
3
548
3
432
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 2
698
—
—
4
890
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity 16
440
6
174
4
33
Consumer - other —
—
—
—
1
5
66
$ 5,847
57
$ 6,052
61
$ 6,671

Impaired loans - The following information pertains to impaired loans, by class, as of the dates presented. ~~During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017, management refined its methodology for classifying loans as impaired.~~


	September 30, 2020						September 30, 2019
			Unpaid						Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Principal		Related
	Investment		Balance		ACL		Investment		Balance		ACL
	(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	12,385	$	12,813	$	—	$	14,683	$	15,241	$	—
Correspondent purchased	1,955		2,058		—		1,763		1,868		—
Bulk purchased	3,843		4,302		—		4,943		5,661		—
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	1,052		1,379		—		0		0		—
Commercial and industrial	99		244		—		60		184		—
Consumer:
Home equity	280		360		—		345		462		—
Other	0		45		—		0		29		—
	19,614		21,201		—		21,794		23,445		—
With an allowance recorded
One- to four-family:
Originated	0		0		0		0		0		0
Correspondent purchased	0		0		0		0		0		0
Bulk purchased	0		0		0		0		0		0
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	660		660		83		0		0		0
Commercial and industrial	1,269		1,268		240		0		0		0
Consumer:
Home equity	0		0		0		0		0		0
Other	0		0		0		0		0		0
	1,929		1,928		323		0		0		0
Total
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	12,385	$	12,813	0		$	14,683	$	15,241	0
Correspondent purchased	1,955		2,058		0		1,763		1,868		0
Bulk purchased	3,843		4,302		0		4,943		5,661		0
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	1,712		2,039		83		0		0		0
Commercial and industrial	1,368		1,512		240		60		184		0
Consumer:
Home equity	280		360		0		345		462		0
Other	0		45		0		0		29		0
	$	21,543	$	23,129	$	323	$	21,794	$	23,445	$	0

113

The ~~change resulting from this refinement was immaterial. Impaired loans include loans partially charged-off and TDRs. All~~following information pertains to impaired loans, ~~are individually evaluated~~by class, for ~~loss and all losses are charged-off, resulting in no related ACL for these loans.~~the periods presented.


	For the Years Ended
	September 30, 2020				September 30, 2019				September 30, 2018
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
	(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	13,918	$	606	$	16,030	$	671	$	23,847	$	990
Correspondent purchased	1,878		73		2,071		82		3,204		112
Bulk purchased	4,720		179		5,257		180		6,438		191
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	725		15		0		0		0		0
Commercial and industrial	41		0		5		0		0		0
Consumer:
Home equity	318		20		417		28		588		39
Other	0		0		0		0		0		0
	21,600		893		23,780		961		34,077		1,332
With an allowance recorded
One- to four-family:
Originated	0		0		0		0		0		0
Correspondent purchased	0		0		0		0		0		0
Bulk purchased	0		0		0		0		0		0
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	51		0		0		0		0		0
Commercial and industrial	1,413		91		0		0		0		0
Consumer:
Home equity	0		0		0		0		0		0
Other	0		0		0		0		0		0
	1,464		91		0		0		0		0
Total
One- to four-family:
Originated	13,918		606		16,030		671		23,847		990
Correspondent purchased	1,878		73		2,071		82		3,204		112
Bulk purchased	4,720		179		5,257		180		6,438		191
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	776		15		0		0		0		0
Commercial and industrial	1,454		91		5		0		0		0
Consumer:
Home equity	318		20		417		28		588		39
Other	0		0		0		0		0		0
	$	23,064	$	984	$	23,780	$	961	$	34,077	$	1,332

114

September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
Unpaid Unpaid
Recorded Principal Related Recorded Principal Related
Investment Balance ACL Investment Balance ACL
(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded
One- to four-family - originated $ 30,251
$ 30,953
$ —
$ 22,982
$ 23,640
$ —
One- to four-family - correspondent 3,800
3,771
—
2,963
2,950
—
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 7,403
8,606
—
10,985
12,684
—
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity 775
997
—
1,014
1,230
—
Consumer - other —
24
—
10
42
—
42,229
44,351
—
37,954
40,546
—
With an allowance recorded
One- to four-family - originated —
—
—
13,430
13,476
125
One- to four-family - correspondent —
—
—
2,662
2,664
4
One- to four-family - bulk purchased —
—
—
1,650
1,627
49
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity —
—
—
548
548
38
Consumer - other —
—
—
6
6
1
—
—
—
18,296
18,321
217
Total
One- to four-family - originated 30,251
30,953
—
36,412
37,116
125
One- to four-family - correspondent 3,800
3,771
—
5,625
5,614
4
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 7,403
8,606
—
12,635
14,311
49
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity 775
997
—
1,562
1,778
38
Consumer - other —
24
—
16
48
1
$ 42,229
$ 44,351
$ —
$ 56,250
$ 58,867
$ 217

For the Years Ended
September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2015
Average Interest Average Interest Average Interest
Recorded Income Recorded Income Recorded Income
Investment Recognized Investment Recognized Investment Recognized
(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded
One- to four-family - originated $ 24,122
$ 917
$ 12,063
$ 470
$ 11,744
$ 451
One- to four-family - correspondent 3,346
118
495
18
471
10
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 9,852
194
11,022
196
11,153
196
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity 988
86
628
93
485
29
Consumer - other 7
—
13
1
12
—
38,315
1,315
24,221
778
23,865
686
With an allowance recorded
One- to four-family - originated 11,469
434
24,199
983
25,465
1,026
One- to four-family - correspondent 2,018
65
2,669
50
1,759
53
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 1,160
20
2,219
27
2,960
40
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity 457
36
895
64
795
34
Consumer - other 10
1
13
1
15
2
15,114
556
29,995
1,125
30,994
1,155
Total
One- to four-family - originated 35,591
1,351
36,262
1,453
37,209
1,477
One- to four-family - correspondent 5,364
183
3,164
68
2,230
63
One- to four-family - bulk purchased 11,012
214
13,241
223
14,113
236
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity 1,445
122
1,523
157
1,280
63
Consumer - other 17
1
26
2
27
2
$ 53,429
$ 1,871
$ 54,216
$ 1,903
$ 54,859
$ 1,841

Allowance for Credit Losses - The Bank maintains an ACL to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio based on quarterly assessments of the loan portfolio. Each quarter a formula analysis model is prepared which segregates the loan portfolio into categories based on certain risk characteristics. Historical loss factors and qualitative factors are applied to each loan category in the formula analysis model. The factors are reviewed by management quarterly to assess whether the factors adequately cover probable and estimable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. As noted in Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Allowance for Credit Losses, management increased the historical loss factors and qualitative factors for all loan categories at September 30, 2020 and applied a COVID-19 qualitative factor to the Bank's commercial loan portfolio, due to deterioration of economic conditions as a result of the COVD-19 pandemic. The increase in the factors and the new COVID-19 pandemic qualitative factor resulted in an increase in the ACL during the current fiscal year. Management will continue to closely monitor economic conditions and will work with borrowers as necessary to assist them through this challenging economic climate. If economic conditions worsen or do not improve in the near term, and if future government programs, if any, do not provide adequate relief to borrowers, it is possible the Bank's ACL will need to increase in future periods.

The following is a summary of ACL activity, by loan portfolio segment, for the periods presented, and the ending balance of ACL based on the Company's impairment methodology.


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2020
	One- to Four-Family
			Correspondent		Bulk
	Originated		Purchased		Purchased		Total		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	2,000	$	1,203	$	687	$	3,890	$	5,171	$	165	$	9,226
Charge-offs	(64)		0		0		(64)		(349)		(30)		(443)
Recoveries	41		0		265		306		110		28		444
Provision for credit losses	4,108		1,488		(485)		5,111		16,868		321		22,300
Ending balance	$	6,085	$	2,691	$	467	$	9,243	$	21,800	$	484	$	31,527


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2019
	One- to Four-Family
			Correspondent		Bulk
	Originated		Purchased		Purchased		Total		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	2,953	$	1,861	$	925	$	5,739	$	2,556	$	168	$	8,463
Charge-offs	(75)		0		(26)		(101)		(124)		(37)		(262)
Recoveries	22		0		106		128		49		98		275
Provision for credit losses	(900)		(658)		(318)		(1,876)		2,690		(64)		750
Ending balance	$	2,000	$	1,203	$	687	$	3,890	$	5,171	$	165	$	9,226

115


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2017																					For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
	One- to Four-Family																					One- to Four-Family
				Correspondent			Bulk						Commercial											Correspondent		Bulk
	Originated			Purchased			Purchased			Total			Real Estate		Consumer			Total				Originated		Purchased		Purchased		Total		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)																					(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	3,928		$	2,102		$	1,065		$	7,095		$	1,208	$	237		$	8,540		Beginning balance	$	3,173	$	1,922	$	1,000	$	6,095	$	2,112	$	191	$	8,398
Charge-offs	(72		)	—			(216		)	(288		)	—		(60		)	(348		)	Charge-offs	(136)		(128)		0		(264)		0		(38)		(302)
Recoveries	4			—			165			169			—		37			206			Recoveries	144		0		196		340		0		27		367
Provision for credit losses	(687		)	(180		)	(14		)	(881		)	904		(23		)	—			Provision for credit losses	(228)		67		(271)		(432)		444		(12)		0
Ending balance	$	3,173		$	1,922		$	1,000		$	6,095		$	2,112	$	191		$	8,398		Ending balance	$	2,953	$	1,861	$	925	$	5,739	$	2,556	$	168	$	8,463

For the Year Ended September 30, 2016
One- to Four-Family

Correspondent Bulk
Commercial
Originated Purchased Purchased Total Real Estate Consumer Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance $ 4,865
$ 2,115
$ 1,434
$ 8,414
$ 742
$ 287
$ 9,443
Charge-offs (200 ) —
(342 ) (542 ) —
(88 ) (630 )
Recoveries 77
—
374
451
—
26
477
Provision for credit losses (814 ) (13 ) (401 ) (1,228 ) 466
12
(750 )
Ending balance $ 3,928
$ 2,102
$ 1,065
$ 7,095
$ 1,208
$ 237
$ 8,540

For the Year Ended September 30, 2015
One- to Four-Family

Correspondent Bulk
Commercial
Originated Purchased Purchased Total Real Estate Consumer Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance $ 4,460
$ 1,803
$ 2,323
$ 8,586
$ 400
$ 241
$ 9,227
Charge-offs (424 ) (11 ) (228 ) (663 ) —
(72 ) (735 )
Recoveries 56
—
58
114
—
66
180
Provision for credit losses 773
323
(719 ) 377
342
52
771
Ending balance $ 4,865
$ 2,115
$ 1,434
$ 8,414
$ 742
$ 287
$ 9,443

The following is a summary of the loan portfolio and related ACL balances, at the dates presented, by loan portfolio segment disaggregated by the Company's impairment method. ~~There was no ACL for loans individually evaluated for impairment at either date as all losses were charged-off.~~


	September 30, 2020
	One- to Four-Family
			Correspondent		Bulk
	Originated		Purchased		Purchased		Total		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Recorded investment in loans:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,945,350	$	2,125,733	$	205,497	$	6,276,580	$	822,643	$	113,612	$	7,212,835
Individually evaluated for impairment	12,385		1,955		3,843		18,183		3,080		280		21,543
	$	3,957,735	$	2,127,688	$	209,340	$	6,294,763	$	825,723	$	113,892	$	7,234,378

ACL for loans:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	6,085	$	2,691	$	467	$	9,243	$	21,477	$	484	$	31,204
Individually evaluated for impairment	0		0		0		0		323		0		323
	$	6,085	$	2,691	$	467	$	9,243	$	21,800	$	484	$	31,527

116

September 30, 2017
One- to Four-Family

Correspondent Bulk
Commercial
Originated Purchased Purchased Total Real Estate Consumer Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Recorded investment in loans
collectively evaluated for impairment $ 3,945,063
$ 2,476,063
$ 346,035
$ 6,767,161
$ 268,979
$ 125,100
$ 7,161,240

Recorded investment in loans

individually evaluated for impairment 30,251
3,800
7,404
41,455
—
774
42,229
$ 3,975,314
$ 2,479,863
$ 353,439
$ 6,808,616
$ 268,979
$ 125,874
$ 7,203,469

ACL for loans collectively
evaluated for impairment $ 3,173
$ 1,922
$ 1,000
$ 6,095
$ 2,112
$ 191
$ 8,398


	September 30, 2019
	One- to Four-Family
			Correspondent		Bulk
	Originated		Purchased		Purchased		Total		Commercial		Consumer		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Recorded investment in loans:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,881,100	$	2,379,651	$	248,541	$	6,509,292	$	763,662	$	131,225	$	7,404,179
Individually evaluated for impairment	14,683		1,763		4,943		21,389		60		345		21,794
	$	3,895,783	$	2,381,414	$	253,484	$	6,530,681	$	763,722	$	131,570	$	7,425,973

ACL for loans:
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,000	$	1,203	$	687	$	3,890	$	5,171	$	165	$	9,226
Individually evaluated for impairment	0		0		0		0		0		0		0
	$	2,000	$	1,203	$	687	$	3,890	$	5,171	$	165	$	9,226

117

September 30, 2016
One- to Four-Family

Correspondent Bulk
Commercial
Originated Purchased Purchased Total Real Estate Consumer Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Recorded investment in loans
collectively evaluated for impairment $ 4,003,750
$ 2,233,347
$ 407,833
$ 6,644,930
$ 153,082
$ 126,504
$ 6,924,516

Recorded investment in loans

individually evaluated for impairment 24,960
4,975
11,008
40,943
—
1,105
42,048
$ 4,028,710
$ 2,238,322
$ 418,841
$ 6,685,873
$ 153,082
$ 127,609
$ 6,966,564

ACL for loans collectively
evaluated for impairment $ 3,928
$ 2,102
$ 1,065
$ 7,095
$ 1,208
$ 237
$ 8,540

5.6.PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of the net carrying value of premises and equipment at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019 was as follows:


	2020		2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
Land	$	16,566	$	14,313
Building and improvements	116,595		110,262
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	57,504		52,270
	190,665		176,845
Less accumulated depreciation	88,790		80,061
	$	101,875	$	96,784

2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Land $ 11,670
$ 11,065
Building and improvements 96,401
91,700
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 43,410
42,590
151,481
145,355
Less accumulated depreciation 66,663
62,134
$ 84,818
$ 83,221

The Bank has entered into non-cancelable operating lease agreements with respect to banking premises and equipment. It is expected that many agreements will be renewed at expiration in the normal course of business. Rental expense was $1.1 million, $1.2 million, and $1.1 million for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

As of September 30, 2017, future minimum rental commitments, rounded to the nearest thousand, required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year were as follows:

2018 $ 1,170
2019 1,057
2020 813
2021 703
2022 623
Thereafter 1,906
$ 6,272

6.7. LOW INCOME HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS

The Bank's investment in low income housing partnerships, which is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets, was ~~$66.1~~$89.7 million and ~~$58.0~~$82.6 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, respectively. The Bank's obligations related to unfunded commitments, which are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets, were ~~$29.4~~$44.5 million and ~~$27.2~~$40.0 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, respectively. The majority of the commitments at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 are projected to be funded through the end of calendar year ~~2020.~~2022.

For fiscal year ~~2017,~~2020, the net income tax benefit associated with these investments, which consists of proportional amortization expense and affordable housing tax credits and other related tax benefits, was reported in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. The amount of proportional amortization expense recognized during fiscal ~~year 2017~~years 2020, 2019 and 2018 was ~~$4.4~~$7.9 million, $6.8 million and $7.0 million, respectively, and the amount of affordable housing tax credits and other related tax benefits was ~~$6.9~~$9.8 million, $8.6 million and $7.5 million, respectively, resulting in a net income tax benefit of $2.5 million. For fiscal years 2016 and 2015, the expenses were reported in the low income housing partnerships line of the consolidated statements of income, and the amount of affordable housing tax credits and other related tax benefits was $6.0$1.9 million, $1.8 million and ~~$5.3 million,~~$500 thousand, respectively. There were no0 impairment losses during fiscal years ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, or ~~2015~~2018 resulting from the forfeiture or ineligibility of tax credits or other circumstances.

118

8.INTANGIBLE ASSETS

With the acquisition of CCB in fiscal year 2018, the Company recognized goodwill of $8.0 million, which is calculated as the consideration exchanged in excess of the fair value of assets, net of the fair value of liabilities assumed. Certain purchase accounting adjustments were applied during the measurement period in fiscal year 2019, resulting in a $1.3 million increase in goodwill associated with the acquisition of CCB. The Company also recognized $10.1 million of other intangible assets in conjunction with the acquisition which is largely composed of core deposit intangibles. These other intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated lives, which management determined to be 8.0 years at the time of acquisition.

Changes in the carrying amount of the Company's intangible assets, which are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet, are presented in the following table.


			Core Deposit and
	Goodwill		Other Intangibles
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	0	$	0
Acquisition of CCB	7,989		10,052
Less: Amortization	0		(234)
Balance at September 30, 2018	7,989		9,819
Purchase accounting adjustments	1,335		0
Less: Amortization	0		(2,316)
Balance at September 30, 2019	9,324		7,503
Purchase accounting adjustments	0		0
Less: Amortization	0		(1,964)
Balance at September 30, 2020	$	9,324	$	5,539

As of September 30, 2020, there was 0 impairment recorded on goodwill or other intangible assets.

The estimated amortization expense for the next five years related to the core deposit and other intangible assets as of September 30, 2020 is presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):


2021	$	1,659
2022	1,358
2023	1,056
2024	761
2025	509

119

9. DEPOSITS AND BORROWED FUNDS

Deposits - Non-interest-bearing deposits totaled ~~$243.7~~$451.4 million and ~~$217.0~~$357.3 million as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, respectively. Certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $250 thousand were ~~$676.1~~$643.0 million and ~~$576.4~~$610.0 million as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, respectively. Deposits in excess of $250 thousand may not be fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

FHLB Borrowings - FHLB borrowings at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 consisted of ~~$2.17~~$1.79 billion in FHLB advances, of which ~~$1.98~~$1.15 billion were fixed-rate advances and ~~$200.0~~$640.0 million were variable-rate ~~advances. FHLB borrowings at September 30, 2016 consisted of $2.37 billion in fixed-rate FHLB advances. There were no~~advances, and 0 borrowings against the variable-rate FHLB line of ~~credit~~credit. FHLB borrowings at September 30, ~~2017~~2019 consisted of $2.04 billion in FHLB advances, of which $1.40 billion were fixed-rate advances and ~~2016.~~$640.0 million were variable-rate advances, and $100.0 million against the variable-rate FHLB line of credit. The line of credit is set to expire on November ~~16, 2018,~~12, 2021, at which time it is expected to be renewed ~~automatically~~ by FHLB for a ~~one year~~one-year period.

FHLB advances at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019 were comprised of the following:


	2020			2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
FHLB advances	$	1,793,000		$	2,040,000
Deferred prepayment penalty	(3,687)			(11)
	$	1,789,313		$	2,039,989

Weighted average contractual interest rate on FHLB advances	1.41		%	2.23		%
Weighted average effective interest rate on FHLB advances(1)	2.31			2.37

2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
FHLB advances $ 2,175,000
$ 2,375,000
Deferred prepayment penalty (1,192 ) (2,611 )
$ 2,173,808
$ 2,372,389

Weighted average contractual interest rate on FHLB advances 1.96 % 2.17 %
Weighted average effective interest rate on FHLB advances⁽¹⁾
2.09
2.24

(1)The effective interest rate includes the net impact of deferred amounts and interest rate swaps related to the adjustable-rate FHLB advances.


~~(1)~~	~~The effective interest rate includes the net impact of deferred amounts and interest rate swaps related to the variable-rate FHLB advances.~~

During fiscal years ~~2017, 2016~~2019 and ~~2015,~~2018, the Bank utilized a leverage strategy (the "leverage strategy") to increase earnings. The leverage strategy involves borrowing up to $2.10 billion either on the Bank's FHLB line of credit or by entering into short-term FHLB advances, depending on the rates offered by FHLB, with all of the balance being paid down at each quarter ~~end.~~end, or earlier if the strategy it is not profitable. The proceeds of the borrowings, net of the required FHLB stock holdings, are deposited at the FRB of Kansas City. ~~Management can discontinue the use of the~~The leverage strategy was not utilized during the current year due to the negative interest rate spreads between the related FHLB borrowings and cash held at ~~any point in time.~~the FRB of Kansas City making the transaction unprofitable.

~~During fiscal year 2017,~~At both September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Bank had entered into interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of ~~$200.0~~$640.0 million in order to hedge the variable cash flows associated with ~~the $200.0~~$640.0 million of ~~variable-rate~~adjustable-rate FHLB advances. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020 and 2019, the interest rate swap agreements had an average remaining term to maturity of ~~5.9 years.~~3.5 years and 4.5 years, respectively. The interest rate swaps were designated as cash flow hedges and involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Bank making fixed-rate payments over the life of the interest rate swap agreements. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020 and September 30, 2019, the interest rate swaps were in a loss position with a total fair value of ~~the interest rate swaps was $598 thousand~~$53.1 million and $33.1 million, respectively, which was reported in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet. During fiscal ~~year 2017, $134~~years 2020 and 2019, $6.3 million and $438 thousand, ~~was~~respectively, were reclassified from AOCI ~~to interest expense and no hedge ineffectiveness was recognized in the consolidated statements of income. During the next 12 months, the Company estimates that $1.1 million will be reclassified~~ as an increase to interest expense. At September 30, 2020, the Company estimated that $15.6 million of interest expense associated with the interest rate swaps will be reclassified from AOCI as an increase to interest expense on FHLB borrowings during the next 12 months. The Bank has minimum collateral posting thresholds with its derivative ~~counterparty~~counterparties and posts collateral on a daily basis. The Bank posted cash collateral of ~~$731 thousand~~$54.6 million at September 30, ~~2017.~~2020 and $33.3 million at September 30, 2019.

During the current fiscal year, ~~2015,~~ the Bank prepaid ~~$325.0~~fixed-rate FHLB advances totaling $350.0 million with a weighted average contractual interest rate of 2.42% and a weighted average remaining term of 1.0 years, and replaced these advances with $350.0 million of fixed-rate FHLB advances with a weighted average contractual interest rate of 2.61% and a weighted average remaining term to maturity of approximately four months. The prepaid FHLB advances were replaced with $325.0 million of fixed-rate FHLB advances with a weighted average contractual interest rate of 1.66%1.43% and a weighted average term of ~~53 months.~~4.7 years. The Bank paid ~~$3.4~~penalties totaling $4.2 million ~~in prepayment penalties~~ to FHLB as a result of prepaying the FHLB advances. The present value of the cash flows under the terms of the new FHLB advances was not more than 10% different from the present value of the cash flow under the terms of the prepaid FHLB advances (including the prepayment penalties) and there were no embedded conversion options in the prepaid advances or in the new FHLB advances. The prepayment penalties effectively increased the weighted average interest rate on the new advances by 42 basis points at the time of the transactions. The deferred prepayment penalties are being recognized in interest expense over the ~~lives~~life of the new FHLB advances.

120

FHLB borrowings are secured by certain qualifying loans pursuant to a blanket collateral agreement with FHLB and certain securities, when necessary. Per FHLB's lending guidelines, total FHLB borrowings cannot exceed 40% of a borrowing institution's regulatory total assets without the pre-approval of FHLB senior management. In July ~~2017,~~2020, the president of FHLB approved an increase, through July ~~2018,~~2021, in the Bank's borrowing limit to ~~55%~~50% of Bank Call Report total assets. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the ratio of the par value of the Bank's FHLB borrowings to the Bank's Call Report total assets was ~~24%~~19%. ~~During fiscal year 2017,~~At times, the Bank's FHLB borrowings to the Bank's Call Report total assets ~~was~~may be in excess of 40% due to the leverage strategy.

Repurchase Agreements -At September 30, ~~2017 and 2016,~~2020, the Company had 0 repurchase agreements outstanding. At September 30, 2019, the Company had repurchase agreements outstanding in the amount of ~~$200.0~~$100.0 million, with a weighted average contractual rate of ~~2.94%~~2.53%. The repurchase agreements were included in other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet. All of the Company's repurchase agreements at September 30, ~~2017 and 2016~~2019 were fixed-rate. See Note 34 for information regarding the amount of securities pledged as collateral in conjunction with repurchase agreements. Securities are delivered to the party with whom each transaction is executed and the party agrees to resell the same securities to the Bank at the maturity of the agreement. The Bank retains the right to substitute similar or like securities throughout the terms of the agreements. The repurchase agreements and collateral are subject to valuation at current market levels and the Bank may ask for the return of excess collateral or be required to post additional collateral due to changes in the market values of these items. The Bank may also be required to post additional collateral as a result of principal payments received on the securities pledged.

Maturity of Borrowed Funds and Certificates of Deposit - The following table presents the scheduled maturity of FHLB advances, at par, ~~repurchase agreements,~~ and certificates of deposit as of September 30, ~~2017:~~2020:


	FHLB		Certificates
	Advances		of Deposit
	Amount		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
2021	$	843,000	$	1,505,501
2022	200,000		773,278
2023	300,000		426,520
2024	100,000		239,650
2025	250,000		75,391
Thereafter	100,000		904
	$	1,793,000	$	3,021,244

Junior Subordinated Debentures and Trust-Preferred Securities - In conjunction with the CCB acquisition, the Company assumed $10.1 million of junior subordinated debentures relating to mandatorily redeemable capital trust preferred securities that were previously issued by CCB-sponsored trusts to third-party investors. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities to investors were invested by the trusts in the related junior subordinated debentures issued by CCB. The junior subordinated debentures were redeemed by the Company during fiscal year 2019, which resulted in the concurrent redemption by the trusts of the related trust preferred securities.

121

FHLB Repurchase Certificates
Advances Agreements of Deposit
Amount Amount Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
2018 $ 475,000
$ 100,000
$ 1,116,415
2019 500,000
—
748,537
2020 350,000
100,000
591,966
2021 550,000
—
274,805
2022 200,000
—
177,308
Thereafter 100,000
—
1,390
$ 2,175,000
$ 200,000
$ 2,910,421

8.10. INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense for the years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015~~2018 consisted of the following:


	2020		2019		2018
	(Dollars in thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	17,610	$	22,030	$	26,007
State	4,068		4,742		3,512
	21,678		26,772		29,519
Deferred:
Federal	(4,857)		(456)		(5,956)
State	(731)		95		1,416
	(5,588)		(361)		(4,540)
	$	16,090	$	26,411	$	24,979

2017
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
Current:
Federal $ 38,127
$ 33,298
$ 30,079
State 4,734
4,677
4,395
42,861
37,975
34,474
Deferred:
Federal 712
286
2,869
State 210
184
332
922
470
3,201
$ 43,783
$ 38,445
$ 37,675

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted in December 2017, made significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax laws, such as a permanent reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The Company had a blended statutory federal income tax rate of 24.5% for the year ended September 30, 2018, which was based on the applicable income tax rates prior to and subsequent to January 1, 2018 and the number of days in the fiscal year. The Company revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the enactment date to account for the future impact of a lower federal income tax rate. The revaluation of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted in a $7.5 million reduction in income tax expense during the December 31, 2017 quarter and a corresponding reduction in the Company's net deferred tax liability, as reflected in the table below.

The Company's effective tax rates were ~~34.2%~~20.0%, ~~31.5%~~21.9%, and ~~32.5%~~20.2% for the years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015,~~2018, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate for the year ended September 30, 2017 was due primarily to the accounting method change for low income housing partnership investments. See "Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for further discussion regarding the accounting method change and "Note 6. Low Income Housing Partnerships" for additional information regarding the income tax expense components of the low income housing partnership investments. The differences between such effective rates and the statutory Federal income tax rate computed on income before income tax expense resulted from the following:


	2020				2019				2018
	Amount		%		Amount		%		Amount		%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Federal income tax expense
computed at statutory Federal rate	$	16,932	21.0	%	$	25,337	21.0	%	$	30,392	24.5	%
Increases (decreases) in taxes resulting from:
State taxes, net of Federal tax effect	2,626		3.3		4,024		3.3		3,986		3.2
Deferred tax liability remeasurement, net	0		0		0		0		(7,498)		(6.0)
Low income housing tax credits, net	(1,897)		(2.4)		(1,745)		(1.4)		(500)		(0.4)
ESOP related expenses, net	(525)		(0.6)		(757)		(0.6)		(790)		(0.6)
Acquired BOLI policies	(636)		(0.8)		0		0		0		0
Other	(410)		(0.5)		(448)		(0.4)		(611)		(0.5)
	$	16,090	20.0	%	$	26,411	21.9	%	$	24,979	20.2	%

2017 2016 2015
Amount % Amount % Amount %
(Dollars in thousands)
Federal income tax expense
computed at statutory Federal rate $ 44,772
35.0 % $ 42,679
35.0 % $ 40,519
35.0 %
Increases (decreases) in taxes resulting from:
State taxes, net of Federal tax effect 3,452
2.7
3,308
2.7
3,257
2.8
Low income housing tax credits, presented net of proportional amortization in 2017 (2,468 ) (2.0 ) (4,815 ) (4.0 ) (4,316 ) (3.7 )
ESOP related expenses, net (1,052 ) (0.8 ) (1,127 ) (0.9 ) (1,222 ) (1.1 )
Other (921 ) (0.7 ) (1,600 ) (1.3 ) (563 ) (0.5 )
$ 43,783
34.2 % $ 38,445
31.5 % $ 37,675
32.5 %

Deferred income tax expense represents the change in deferred income tax assets and liabilities excluding the tax effects of the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on AFS securities, interest rate swaps and changes in the market value of restricted stock between the grant date and vesting date. The sources of these differences and the tax effect of each as of September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 were as follows:

122

2017
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries, deferred compensation and employee benefits $ 437
$ (143 ) $ (12 )
Low income housing partnerships 285
(318 ) (763 )
ACL 185
480
(75 )
Premises and equipment 14
1,593
(129 )
FHLB stock dividends 4
(1,357 ) 4,083
Capitol Federal Foundation contribution —
—
418
Other, net (3 ) 215
(321 )
$ 922
$ 470
$ 3,201

The components of the net deferred income tax liabilities as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019 were as follows:


	2020		2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
Deferred income tax assets:
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps	$	12,916	$	8,041
ACL	6,553		1,938
Lease liabilities	3,590		0
Salaries, deferred compensation and employee benefits	1,622		1,579
ESOP compensation	1,360		1,288
Low income housing partnerships	655		792
Net purchase discounts related to acquired loans	577		991

Other	2,717		2,918
Gross deferred income tax assets	29,990		17,547

Valuation allowance	(1,808)		(1,823)
Gross deferred income tax asset, net of valuation allowance	28,182		15,724

Deferred income tax liabilities:
FHLB stock dividends	15,699		16,009
Unrealized gain on AFS securities	7,617		3,258
Premises and equipment	4,625		3,546
Lease right-of-use assets	3,588		0
Deposit intangible	1,475		1,978
ACL	2,388		3,018

Other	970		2,197
Gross deferred income tax liabilities	36,362		30,006

Net deferred tax liabilities	$	8,180	$	14,282

2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Deferred income tax assets:
Salaries, deferred compensation and employee benefits $ 2,583
$ 3,020
Low income housing partnerships 1,478
1,763
ESOP compensation 1,724
1,566
ACL 711
896
Other 2,621
2,528
Gross deferred income tax assets 9,117
9,773

Valuation allowance (1,795 ) (1,804 )
Gross deferred income tax asset, net of valuation allowance 7,322
7,969

Deferred income tax liabilities:
FHLB stock dividends 23,242
23,238
Premises and equipment 6,105
6,091
Unrealized gain on AFS securities 2,000
3,595
Other 433
419
Gross deferred income tax liabilities 31,780
33,343

Net deferred tax liabilities $ 24,458
$ 25,374

The State of Kansas allows for a bad debt deduction on savings and loan institutions' privilege tax returns of up to 5% of Kansas taxable income. Due to the low level of net loan charge-offs experienced by the Bank historically, at times, the Bank's bad debt deduction on the Kansas privilege tax return has been in excess of actual net charge-offs, resulting in a state deferred tax liability, which is presented separately from the federal deferred tax asset related to ACL.

The Company assesses the available positive and negative evidence surrounding the recoverability of its deferred tax assets and applies its judgment in estimating the amount of valuation allowance necessary under the circumstances. At both September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, the Company had a valuation allowance of $1.8 million related to the net operating losses generated by the Company's consolidated Kansas corporate income tax return. The companies included in the consolidated Kansas corporate income tax return are the holding company, ~~and~~ Capitol Funds, Inc. and Capital City Investments, Inc., as the Bank files a Kansas privilege tax return. Based on the nature of the operations of the holding company, ~~and~~ Capitol Funds, Inc. and Capital City Investments, Inc., management believes there will not be sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deferred tax assets noted above; therefore, a valuation allowance has been recorded for the related amounts at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016.~~2019.

~~Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC")~~ASC 740 Income Taxes prescribes a process by which a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, on an income tax return is determined based upon the technical merits of the position, along with whether the tax position meets a more-likely-than-not-recognition threshold, to determine the amount, if any, of unrecognized tax benefits to recognize in the financial statements. Estimated penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits are included in income tax expense in the consolidated

123

statements of income. For the ~~year~~years ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020, 2019, and ~~2016,~~2018 the Company had no0 unrecognized tax benefits. ~~For the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company's unrecognized tax benefits, estimated penalties and interest, and related activities were insignificant.~~

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the state of Kansas, as well as other states where it has either established nexus under an economic nexus theory or has exceeded enumerated nexus thresholds based on the amount of interest income derived from sources within a given state. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years before ~~2014.~~2017.

11. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

The ESOP trust acquired 3,024,574 shares (6,846,728 shares post-corporate reorganization) of common stock in the Company's initial public offering and 4,726,000 shares of common stock in the Company's corporate reorganization in December of 2010. Both acquisitions of common stock were made with proceeds from loans from the Company, secured by shares of the Company's stock purchased in each offering. The Bank has agreed to make cash contributions to the ESOP trust on an annual basis sufficient to enable the ESOP trust to make the required annual loan payments to the Company on September 30 of each year. The loan for the shares acquired in the initial public offering matured on September 30, 2013. The loan for the shares acquired in the corporate reorganization matures on September 30, 2040.

As annual loan payments are made on each September ~~30,~~30th, shares are released from collateral and allocated to qualified employees based on the proportion of their qualifying compensation to total qualifying compensation. On September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, 165,198 shares were released from collateral. On September 30, ~~2018,~~2021, 165,198 shares will be released from collateral. As ESOP shares are committed to be released from collateral, the Company records compensation expense. Dividends on unallocated ESOP shares are applied to the debt service payments of the loan secured by the unallocated shares. Dividends on unallocated ESOP shares in excess of the debt service payment are recorded as compensation expense and distributed to participants or participants' ESOP accounts. Compensation expense related to the ESOP was ~~$3.3~~$2.0 million for the year ended September 30, ~~2017, $3.0~~2020, $3.1 million for the year ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2019, and ~~$3.0~~$2.9 million for the year ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2018. Of these amounts, ~~$784~~$336 thousand, ~~$522~~$549 thousand, and ~~$384~~$541 thousand related to the difference between the market price of the Company's stock when the shares were acquired by the ESOP trust and the average market price of the Company's stock during the years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015,~~2018, respectively. The amount included in compensation expense for dividends on unallocated ESOP shares in excess of the debt service payments was ~~$833 thousand, $813~~0 for the year ended September 30, 2020, and $906 thousand and ~~$952~~$688 thousand for the years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2019 and ~~2015,~~2018, respectively.

Shares may be withdrawn from the ESOP trust due to ~~retirement, termination, or death of the participant. Additionally, a~~diversification (a participant may begin to diversify at least 25% of their ESOP shares at age ~~50.~~50), retirement, termination, or death of the participant. The following is a summary of shares held in the ESOP trust as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016:~~2019:


	2020		2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allocated ESOP shares	4,200,964		4,207,520
Unreleased ESOP shares	3,303,960		3,469,158
Total ESOP shares	7,504,924		7,676,678

Fair value of unreleased ESOP shares	$	30,628	$	47,805

124

2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Allocated ESOP shares 4,369,840
4,392,371
Unreleased ESOP shares 3,799,554
3,964,752
Total ESOP shares 8,169,394
8,357,123

Fair value of unreleased ESOP shares $ 55,853
$ 55,784

~~10.~~12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has a Stock Option Plan, a Restricted Stock Plan, and an Equity Incentive Plan, all of which are considered share-based plans. The Stock Option Plan and Restricted Stock Plan expired in April 2015. No additional grants can be made from these two plans; however, awards granted under these two plans remain outstanding until they are individually vested, forfeited or expire. The objectives of the Equity Incentive Plan are to provide additional compensation to certain officers, directors and key employees by facilitating their acquisition of ~~stock~~an equity interest in the Company and enable the Company to retain personnel of experience and ability in key positions of responsibility.

Stock Option Plans – There are currently ~~508,719~~287,935 stock options outstanding as a result of grants awarded from the Stock Option Plan. The Equity Incentive Plan had 5,907,500 stock options originally eligible to be granted and, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Company had ~~4,184,316~~4,199,316 stock options still available for future grants under this plan. This plan will expire inon January 24, 2027 and no additional grants may be made after expiration, but awards granted under this plan remain outstanding until they are individually vested, forfeited, or expire.

The Company may issue incentive and nonqualified stock options under the Equity Incentive Plan. The Company may also award stock appreciation rights, although no stock appreciation rights have been awarded to date. The incentive stock options expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant, and the nonqualified stock options expire no later than 15 years from the date of grant. The vesting period of the stock options under the Equity Incentive Plan generally has ranged from ~~three~~3 years to ~~five~~5 years. The stock option exercise price cannot be less than the market value at the date of the grant as defined by each plan. The fair value of stock option grants is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Company had ~~1,236,798~~813,645 stock options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of ~~$13.31~~$12.86 per option and a weighted average contractual life of ~~5.3~~3.2 years, and ~~1,144,798~~812,645 options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of ~~$13.38~~$12.86 per option and a weighted average contractual life of ~~5.1~~3.2 years. The exercise price may be paid in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of both. New shares are issued by the Company upon the exercise of stock options.

Compensation expense attributable to stock option awards during the years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015~~2018 totaled ~~$118~~$12 thousand, ~~$335~~$49 thousand, and ~~$618~~$71 thousand, respectively. The fair value of stock options vested during the years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015~~2018 was ~~$174~~$24 thousand, ~~$652~~$64 thousand, and ~~$615~~$77 thousand, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, the total future compensation cost related to non-vested stock options not yet recognized in the consolidated statements of income was $128 thousand, net of estimated forfeitures, and the weighted average period over which these awards are expected to be recognized was 2.0 years.

Restricted Stock Plans – The Equity Incentive Plan had 2,363,000 shares originally eligible to be granted as restricted stock and, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Company had ~~1,757,650~~1,625,519 shares available for future grants of restricted stock under this plan. This plan will expire inon January 24, 2027 and no additional grants may be made after expiration, but awards granted under this plan remain outstanding until they are individually vested or forfeited. The vesting period of the restricted stock awards under the Equity Incentive Plan has generally ranged from ~~three~~3 years to ~~five~~5 years. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Company had ~~56,600~~104,850 unvested shares of restricted stock ~~shares~~ with a weighted average grant date fair value of ~~$13.38~~$13.65 per share.

Compensation expense is calculated based on the fair market value of the common stock at the date of the grant, as defined by the plan, and is recognized over the vesting time period. Compensation expense attributable to restricted stock awards during the years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015~~2018 totaled ~~$388~~$540 thousand, ~~$787~~$501 thousand, and ~~$1.5 million,~~$301 thousand, respectively. The fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015~~2018 totaled ~~$563~~$535 thousand, ~~$1.6 million,~~$294 thousand, and ~~$1.5 million,~~$294 thousand, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2020, there was ~~$635 thousand~~$1.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7 years.

~~11.~~

125

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The following table summarizes the Bank's loan commitments as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016:~~2019:


	2020		2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
Originate fixed-rate	$	96,126	$	55,249
Originate adjustable-rate	21,801		32,206
Purchase/participate fixed-rate	65,600		94,400
Purchase/participate adjustable-rate	65,080		49,141
	$	248,607	$	230,996

2017
2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Originate fixed-rate $ 33,528
$ 68,047
Originate adjustable-rate 9,861
12,257
Purchase/participate fixed-rate 74,104
138,792
Purchase/participate adjustable-rate 52,453
18,653
$ 169,946
$ 237,749

Commitments to originate loans are commitments to lend to a customer. Commitments to purchase/participate in loans represent commitments to purchase loans from correspondent lenders on a loan-by-loan basis or participate in commercial ~~real estate~~ loans with a lead bank. The Bank evaluates each borrower's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Commitments generally have expiration dates or other termination clauses and ~~one-to~~one- to four-family loan commitments may require the payment of a rate lock fee. Some of the commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn upon; therefore, the amount of total commitments disclosed in the table above does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, there were no significant loan-related commitments that met the definition of derivatives or commitments to sell mortgage loans. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, the Bank had approved but unadvanced ~~home equity~~ lines of credit of ~~$240.0~~$283.2 million and ~~$262.8~~$265.2 million, respectively.

The Company also has standby letters of credit, which are conditional commitments to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Most guarantees have one-year terms. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. At September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in outstanding standby letters of credit, and no amounts had been recorded as liabilities for the Company's potential obligations under these agreements at either date.

In the normal course of business, the Company and ~~its subsidiary~~the Bank are named defendants in various lawsuits and counterclaims. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, none of the currently pending suits are expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, or future periods.

~~12.~~

14. REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

The Bank and the Company are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and, possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial statements. Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, the Company and Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company's and Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Additionally, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines to be considered well capitalized per the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. The Company's and Bank's capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

The Bank and the Company must maintain certain minimum capital ratios as set forth in the table below for capital adequacy purposes. In September 2019, the regulatory agencies, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and FRB, adopted a final rule, effective January 1, 2020, creating a community bank leverage ratio ("CBLR") for institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion and that meet other qualifying criteria. Qualifying institutions that elect to use the CBLR framework and that maintain a leverage ratio of greater than 9% will be considered to have satisfied the generally applicable risk-based and leverage capital requirements in the regulatory agencies' capital rules and to have met the well-capitalized ratio requirements. In April 2020, as directed by Section 4012 of the CARES Act, the regulatory agencies introduced temporary changes to the CBLR. These changes, which subsequently were adopted as a final rule, temporarily reduced the CBLR requirement to 8% through the end of calendar year 2020. Beginning in calendar year 2021, the CBLR

126

requirement will increase to 8.5% for the calendar year before returning to 9% in calendar year 2022. Management has elected to use the CBLR framework for the Bank and Company.

Before electing to use the CBLR framework, the Company and Bank were required to maintain a capital conservation buffer above certain minimum risk-based capital ratios for capital adequacy purposes in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and other payments including dividends, share repurchases, and certain compensation. The capital conservation buffer was 2.5% at September 30, 2019, and the Bank and Company exceeded the capital conservation buffer requirement at that time.

Management believes, as of September 30, 2020, that the Bank and Company meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject and there were no conditions or events subsequent to September 30, 2020 that would change the Bank's or Company's category.


									To Be Well
									Capitalized
									Under Prompt
					For Capital				Corrective Action
	Actual				Adequacy Purposes				Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount	Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
Bank
As of September 30, 2020
CBLR	$	1,168,808	12.4	%	$	754,884	8.0	%	N/A	N/A




As of September 30, 2019
Tier 1 leverage	1,169,037		12.1		387,427		4.0		484,284	5.0
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital	1,169,037		24.1		218,042		4.5		314,949	6.5
Tier 1 capital	1,169,037		24.1		290,722		6.0		387,630	8.0
Total capital	1,178,263		24.3		387,630		8.0		484,537	10.0

Company
As of September 30, 2020
CBLR	1,287,854		13.7		754,767		8.0		N/A	N/A




As of September 30, 2019
Tier 1 leverage	1,336,377		13.8		387,346		4.0		N/A	N/A
CET1 capital	1,336,377		27.6		218,070		4.5		N/A	N/A
Tier 1 capital	1,336,377		27.6		290,759		6.0		N/A	N/A
Total capital	1,345,603		27.8		387,679		8.0		N/A	N/A

Generally, savings institutions, such as the Bank, may make capital distributions during any calendar year equal to the earnings of the previous two calendar years and current year-to-date earnings. It is generally required that the Bank remain well capitalized before and after the proposed distribution. The Company's ability to pay dividends is dependent, in part, upon its ability to obtain capital distributions from the Bank. So long as the Bank continues to remain well capitalized after each capital distribution and operates in a safe and sound manner, it is management's belief that the regulators will continue to allow the Bank to distribute its net income to the Company, although no assurance can be given in this regard.

In conjunction with the Company's corporate reorganization in December 2010, a "liquidation account" was established for the benefit of certain depositors of the Bank in an amount equal to Capitol Federal Savings Bank MHC's ownership interest in the retained earnings of Capitol Federal Financial as of June 30, 2010. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the balance of this liquidation account was ~~$167.2~~$115.4 million. Under applicable federal banking regulations, neither the Company nor the Bank is permitted to pay dividends on its capital stock to its stockholders if stockholders' equity would be reduced below the amount of the liquidation account at that time.

The Bank and the Company must maintain certain minimum capital ratios as set forth in the table below for capital adequacy purposes. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company and Bank were required to maintain a capital conservation buffer above certain minimum capital ratios for capital adequacy purposes in order to avoid certain restrictions on capital distributions and other payments including dividends, share repurchases, and certain compensation. The required capital conservation buffer is being phased in over a four year period by increasing the required buffer amount by 0.625% each year. The capital conservation buffer was 0.625% at September 30, 2016 and 1.25% at September 30, 2017. At September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Bank and Company exceeded the capital conservation buffer requirement. Once fully phased-in, which will be on January 1, 2019 for the Company and Bank, the organization must maintain a balance of capital that exceeds by more than 2.5% each of the minimum risk-based capital ratios in order to satisfy the requirement. Management believes, as of September 30, 2017, that the Bank and Company meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject and there were no conditions or events subsequent to September 30, 2017 that would change the Bank's or Company's category.

127

To Be Well
Capitalized
Under Prompt
For Capital Corrective Action
Actual Adequacy Purposes Provisions
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
(Dollars in thousands)
Bank
As of September 30, 2017
Tier 1 leverage ratio $ 1,201,863
10.8 % $ 444,877
4.0 % $ 556,097
5.0 %
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital ratio 1,201,863
27.2
199,181
4.5
287,706
6.5
Tier 1 capital ratio 1,201,863
27.2
265,575
6.0
354,100
8.0
Total capital ratio 1,210,261
27.3
354,100
8.0
442,625
10.0

As of September 30, 2016
Tier 1 leverage ratio 1,234,912
10.9
452,339
4.0
565,424
5.0
CET1 capital ratio 1,234,912
28.5
195,080
4.5
281,783
6.5
Tier 1 capital ratio 1,234,912
28.5
260,107
6.0
346,809
8.0
Total capital ratio 1,243,452
28.7
346,809
8.0
433,512
10.0

Company
As of September 30, 2017
Tier 1 leverage ratio 1,365,395
12.3
444,785
4.0
N/A
N/A
CET1 capital ratio 1,365,395
30.8
199,195
4.5
N/A
N/A
Tier 1 capital ratio 1,365,395
30.8
265,594
6.0
N/A
N/A
Total capital ratio 1,373,793
31.0
354,125
8.0
N/A
N/A

As of September 30, 2016
Tier 1 leverage ratio 1,387,049
12.3
452,248
4.0
N/A
N/A
CET1 capital ratio 1,387,049
32.0
195,094
4.5
N/A
N/A
Tier 1 capital ratio 1,387,049
32.0
260,126
6.0
N/A
N/A
Total capital ratio 1,395,589
32.2
346,835
8.0
N/A
N/A

~~13.~~15. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair Value Measurements – The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial instruments and to determine fair value disclosures in accordance with ASC 820 and ASC 825. The Company's AFS securities and interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other financial instruments on a non-recurring basis, such as OREO and loans individually evaluated for impairment. These non-recurring fair value adjustments involve the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual financial instruments.

The Company groups its financial instruments at fair value in three levels based on the markets in which the financial instruments are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

•Level 1 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

•Level 2 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

•Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company's own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the financial instrument. Valuation techniques include the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. The results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the financial instrument.

The Company bases its fair values on the price that would be received from the sale of a financial instrument in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

AFS Securities - The Company's AFS securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair ~~value, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as AOCI in stockholders' equity.~~value. The majority of the securities within the AFS portfolio were issued by GSEs. The Company primarily uses prices obtained from ~~third party~~third-party pricing services to determine the fair value of its securities. On a quarterly basis, management corroborates a sample of prices obtained from the ~~third party~~third-party pricing service for Level 2 securities by comparing them to an independent source. If the price provided by the independent source varies by more than a predetermined percentage from the price received from the ~~third party~~third-party pricing service, then the variance is researched by management. The Company did not have to adjust prices obtained from the ~~third party~~third-party pricing service when determining the fair value of its securities during the years ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016.~~2019. The Company's major security types, based on the nature and risks of the securities, are:

•GSE Debentures - Estimated fair values are based on a discounted cash flow method. Cash flows are determined by taking any embedded options into consideration and are discounted using current market yields for similar securities. (Level 2)

•MBS - Estimated fair values are based on a discounted cash flow method. Cash flows are determined based on prepayment projections of the underlying mortgages and are discounted using current market yields for benchmark securities. (Level 2)

•Municipal Bonds - Estimated fair values are based on a discounted cash flow method. Cash flows are determined by taking any embedded options into consideration and are discounted using current market yields for securities with similar credit profiles. (Level 2)

Trust Preferred Securities - Estimated fair values are based on a discounted cash flow method. Cash flows are determined by taking prepayment and underlying credit considerations into account. The discount rates are derived from secondary trades and bid/offer prices. (Level 3)

Interest Rate Swaps - The Company's interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and are reported at fair value in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet if in a gain position, and in accounts payable and accrued expenses ~~on the consolidated balance sheet,~~if in a loss position, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as AOCI in stockholders' equity. See "Note 7.9. Deposits and Borrowed Funds" for additional information. The estimated fair ~~value~~values of the interest rates swaps are obtained from ~~a third party~~the counterparty and are determined ~~using~~by a discounted cash flow analysis using observable market-based inputs. On a quarterly basis, management corroborates the estimated fair values ~~obtained from the third party~~ by internally calculating the estimated fair value using a discounted

128

cash flow analysis ~~using~~with independent observable market-based ~~inputs. The Company did not make any~~inputs from a third party. No adjustments were made to the estimated fair ~~value received from the third party~~values during the ~~year~~years ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2020 and 2019. (Level 2)

The following tables provide the level of valuation assumption used to determine the carrying value of the Company's financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates presented. The Company did ~~not~~0t have any ~~liabilities that were~~Level 3 financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, ~~2016.~~2020 or 2019.


	September 30, 2020
			Quoted Prices		Significant		Significant
			in Active Markets		Other Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		for Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
AFS Securities:
MBS	$	1,180,803	$	0	$	1,180,803	$	0
GSE debentures	370,340		0		370,340		0
Municipal bonds	9,807		0		9,807		0

	$	1,560,950	$	0	$	1,560,950	$	0



Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps	$	53,149	$	0	$	53,149	$	0


	September 30, 2019
			Quoted Prices		Significant		Significant
			in Active Markets		Other Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		for Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
AFS Securities:
MBS	$	936,487	$	0	$	936,487	$	0
GSE debentures	249,954		0		249,954		0
Municipal bonds	18,422		0		18,422		0

	$	1,204,863	$	0	$	1,204,863	$	0



Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps	$	33,090	$	0	$	33,090	$	0

129

September 30, 2017
Quoted Prices Significant Significant
in Active Markets Other Observable Unobservable
Carrying for Identical Assets Inputs Inputs
Value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
AFS Securities:
GSE debentures $ 270,729
$ —
$ 270,729
$ —
MBS 141,516
—
141,516
—
Municipal bonds 1,535
—
1,535
—
Trust preferred securities 2,051
—
—
2,051
$ 415,831
$ —
$ 413,780
$ 2,051

Liabilities:
Interest Rate Swaps $ 598
$ —
$ 598
$ —

September 30, 2016
Quoted Prices Significant Significant
in Active Markets Other Observable Unobservable
Carrying for Identical Assets Inputs Inputs
Value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
AFS Securities:
GSE debentures $ 347,038
$ —
$ 347,038
$ —
MBS 178,507
—
178,507
—
Trust preferred securities 1,756
—
—
1,756
$ 527,301
$ —
$ 525,545
$ 1,756

The Company's Level 3 AFS securities had no activity during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015 except for principal repayments of $88 thousand, $97 thousand, and $400 thousand, respectively, and (decreases)/increases in net unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income of $(218) thousand, $61 thousand, and $45 thousand, respectively.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for significant financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Loans Receivable – The ~~balance~~fair value of impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment aton a non-recurring basis during fiscal years 2020 and 2019 that were still held in the portfolio as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016~~2019 was ~~$18.4~~$5.7 million and ~~$42.0~~$6.8 million, respectively. ~~All of these~~The one- to four-family loans ~~were secured by residential real estate and~~included in this amount were individually evaluated to determine if the carrying value of the loan was in excess of the fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs of 10%. Fair values were estimated through current ~~appraisals or current Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA") housing price indices, which is a broad based measure of the movement of single-family house prices and is a weighted, repeat-sales index.~~appraisals. Management does not adjust or apply a discount to the appraised value ~~or FHFA housing price indices,~~of one- to four-family loans, except for the estimated sales cost noted ~~above.~~above, and the primary unobservable input for these loans was the appraisal.

For commercial loans, if the most recent appraisal or book value of the collateral does not reflect current market conditions due to the passage of time and/or other factors, management will make adjustments to the existing appraised or book value based on knowledge of local market conditions, recent transactions, and estimated selling costs, if applicable. Adjustments to appraised or book values are generally based on assumptions not observable in the marketplace. The primary significant unobservable ~~input~~inputs for impaired commercial loans individually evaluated for impairment ~~using appraisals~~during the year ended September 30, 2020 were downward adjustments to ~~determine~~ the ~~estimated fair~~book value ~~was~~of the ~~appraisal.~~ collateral for lack of marketability. The adjustments ranged from 4% to 50%, with a weighted average of 18%. There were no impaired commercial loans individually evaluated during the year ended September 30, 2019.

Fair values of impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the loan and, as such, are classified as Level 3. Based on this evaluation, the Bank charged-off all loss amounts as of September 30, 2017 and 2016; therefore, the fair value was equal to the carrying value and there was no ACL related to these loans.

OREO – OREO primarily represents real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure and is carried at lower of cost or fair value. ~~Fair~~The fair value for OREO is estimated through current appraisals or listing prices, less estimated selling costs of 10%. Management does not adjust or apply a discount to the appraised value or listing price, except for the estimated sales costs noted above. The primary significant unobservable input for OREO was the appraisal or listing price. Fair values of foreclosed property cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale of the property and, as such, are classified as Level 3. The fair value of OREO measured on a non-recurring basis during fiscal years 2020 and 2019 that was ~~equal to~~still held in the portfolio as of September 30, 2020 and 2019 was $183 thousand and $678 thousand, respectively. The carrying value of the properties equaled the fair value of the properties at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016 and was $1.4 million and $3.7 million, respectively.~~2019.

Fair Value Disclosures – The Company ~~determined~~ estimated fair value amounts using available market information and a variety of valuation methodologies as of the dates presented. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company would realize from a current market exchange at subsequent dates.

130

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments by fair value hierarchy, at the dates presented, were as follows:


	2020
	Carrying		Estimated Fair Value
	Amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	185,148	$	185,148	$	185,148	$	0	$	0
AFS securities	1,560,950		1,560,950		0		1,560,950		0

Loans receivable	7,202,851		7,663,000		0		0		7,663,000

FHLB stock	93,862		93,862		93,862		0		0


Liabilities:
Deposits	6,191,408		6,259,080		3,170,164		3,088,916		0
Borrowings	1,789,313		1,840,605		0		1,840,605		0
Interest rate swaps	53,149		53,149		0		53,149		0


	2019
	Carrying		Estimated Fair Value
	Amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	220,370	$	220,370	$	220,370	$	0	$	0
AFS securities	1,204,863		1,204,863		0		1,204,863		0

Loans receivable	7,416,747		7,654,586		0		0		7,654,586

FHLB stock	98,456		98,456		98,456		0		0


Liabilities:
Deposits	5,581,867		5,614,895		2,594,242		3,020,653		0
Borrowings	2,239,989		2,253,353		100,001		2,153,352		0
Interest rate swaps	33,090		33,090		0		33,090		0

131

2017 2016
Estimated Estimated
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 351,659
$ 351,659
$ 281,764
$ 281,764
AFS securities 415,831
415,831
527,301
527,301
HTM securities 827,738
833,009
1,100,874
1,122,867
Loans receivable 7,195,071
7,354,100
6,958,024
7,292,971
FHLB stock 100,954
100,954
109,970
109,970
Liabilities:
Deposits 5,309,868
5,318,249
5,164,018
5,204,251
FHLB borrowings 2,173,808
2,182,841
2,372,389
2,434,151
Repurchase agreements 200,000
202,004
200,000
207,303
Interest rate swaps 598
598
—
—

~~The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the financial instruments:~~

~~Cash and cash equivalents~~ ~~- The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents are considered to approximate their fair value due to the nature of the financial assets. (Level 1)~~

~~HTM securities~~ - Estimated fair values of securities are based on one of three methods: (1) quoted market prices where available; (2) quoted market prices for similar instruments if quoted market prices are not available; (3) unobservable data that represents the Bank's assumptions about items that market participants would consider in determining fair value where no market data is available. HTM securities are carried at amortized cost. (Level 2)

~~Loans receivable~~ - The fair value of one- to four-family loans and home equity loans are generally estimated using the present value of expected future cash flows, assuming future prepayments and using discount factors determined by prices obtained from securitization markets, less a discount for the cost of servicing and lack of liquidity. The estimated fair value of the Bank's commercial and consumer loans are based on the expected future cash flows assuming future prepayments and discount factors based on current offering rates. (Level 3)

~~FHLB stock~~ ~~- The carrying value and estimated fair value of FHLB stock equals cost, which is based on redemption at par value. (Level 1)~~

~~Deposits~~ - The estimated fair value of demand deposits, savings, and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The estimated fair value of these deposits at September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $2.40 billion and $2.34 billion, respectively. (Level 1) The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current London Interbank Offered Rates ("LIBOR"). The estimated fair value of certificates of deposit at September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $2.92 billion and $2.87 billion, respectively. (Level 2)

~~FHLB borrowings and repurchase agreements -~~ ~~The fair value of fixed-maturity borrowed funds is estimated by discounting estimated future cash flows using current offer rates. (Level 2)~~

~~Interest rate swaps -~~ ~~The fair value of the interest rate swaps was determined using discounted cash flow analysis using observable market-based inputs. (Level 2)~~

~~14.~~16. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following ~~table presents~~tables present the changes in the components of AOCI, net of tax, for the years presented.


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2020
	Unrealized		Unrealized
	Gains (Losses)		Gains (Losses)
	on AFS		on Cash Flow		Total
	Securities		Hedges		AOCI
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	10,150	$	(25,049)	$	(14,899)

Other comprehensive income (loss), before reclassifications	13,578		(21,458)		(7,880)
Amount reclassified from AOCI, net of taxes of $(2,014)	0		6,274		6,274
Other comprehensive income (loss)	13,578		(15,184)		(1,606)

Ending balance	$	23,728	$	(40,233)	$	(16,505)


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2019
	Unrealized		Unrealized
	Gains (Losses)		Gains (Losses)
	on AFS		on Cash Flow		Total
	Securities		Hedges		AOCI
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	(2,990)	$	7,330	$	4,340
Transfer of HTM securities to AFS securities	2,336		0		2,336
Other comprehensive income (loss), before reclassifications	10,804		(32,817)		(22,013)
Amount reclassified from AOCI, net of taxes of $(141)	0		438		438
Other comprehensive income (loss)	13,140		(32,379)		(19,239)

Ending balance	$	10,150	$	(25,049)	$	(14,899)


	For the Year Ended September 30, 2018
	Unrealized		Unrealized
	Gains (Losses)		Gains (Losses)
	on AFS		on Cash Flow		Total
	Securities		Hedges		AOCI
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	3,290	$	(372)	$	2,918
Other comprehensive income (loss), before reclassifications	(6,741)		6,981		240
Amount reclassified from AOCI, net of taxes of $(197)	0		515		515
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(6,741)		7,496		755
Reclassification of certain income tax effects related to adoption of ASU 2018-02	461		206		667
Ending balance	$	(2,990)	$	7,330	$	4,340

132

17. REVENUE RECOGNITION

On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and all subsequent ASUs that modified the principles for recognizing revenue. The Company's primary sources of revenue consist of net interest income on financial assets and liabilities, which are not within the scope of the amended ASU. In addition, certain non-interest income revenue streams, such as loan servicing fees, derivatives, and BOLI, are not in-scope of the amended ASU. Based on an assessment of non-interest income revenue streams and a review of the related contracts with customers, the Company concluded the amended ASU did not significantly change the Company's revenue recognition methods. The Company elected to implement the amended ASU using the modified retrospective application with a cumulative adjustment, which increased opening retained earnings at October 1, 2018 by $394 thousand related to contracts that were not complete upon adoption. The amount was related to the change in the recognition of revenue related to certain insurance commissions.

Details of the Company's primary types of non-interest income revenue streams by financial statement line item reported in the consolidated statements of income that are within the scope of ASC Topic 606 are below. During fiscal years 2020 and 2019, revenue from contracts with customers totaled $14.8 million and $16.6 million, respectively.

Deposit Service Fees

Interchange Transaction Fees - Interchange transaction fee income primarily consists of interchange fees earned on a transactional basis through card payment networks. The performance obligation for these types of transactions is satisfied as services are rendered for each transaction and revenue is recognized daily concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder.

In order to participate in the card payment networks, the Company must pay various transaction related costs established by the networks ("interchange network charges"), including membership fees and a per unit charge for each transaction. The Company is acting as an agent for its debit card customers when they are utilizing the card payment networks; therefore, upon adoption of the amended ASU, interchange transaction fee income is reported net of interchange network charges. Previously, interchange network charges were reported in deposit and loan expense. Interchange network charges totaled $3.2 million and $3.4 million for fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts - Service charges on deposit accounts consist of account maintenance and transaction-based fees such as overdrafts, insufficient funds, wire transfers and the use of out-of-network ATMs. The Company's performance obligation is satisfied over a period of time, generally a month, for account maintenance and at the time of service for transaction-based fees. Revenue is recognized after the performance obligation is satisfied. Payments are typically collected from the customer's deposit account at the time the transaction is processed and/or at the end of the customer's statement cycle (typically monthly).

Insurance Commissions

Commissions are received on insurance product sales. The Company acts in the capacity of an agent between the Company's customer and the insurance carrier. The Company's performance obligation is satisfied when the terms of the policy have been agreed upon and the insurance policy becomes effective. Additionally, the Company earns performance-based incentives ("contingent insurance commissions") based on certain criteria established by the insurance carriers. Upon adoption of the amended ASU, contingent insurance commissions are accrued based upon management's expectations. Previously, contingent insurance commissions were recognized when the funds were received.

Other Non-Interest Income

Trust Asset Management Income - The Company provides trust asset management services to customers. The Company primarily earns fees for these services over time as the monthly services are provided and the Company assesses revenue at each month end. Fees are charged based on a tiered scale of the market value of the individual trust asset accounts at the end of the month.

133

18. LEASES

The Company leases real estate property for branches, ATMs, and certain equipment. These leases have remaining terms that range from one year ~~ended~~to 47 years, some of which include the exercising of renewal options that the Company considers to be reasonably certain. As September 30, ~~2017. During~~2020, a right-of-use asset of $14.7 million was included in other assets and a lease liability of $14.7 million was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the ~~years ended~~consolidated balance sheets.

As of September 30, ~~2016~~2020, for the Company's operating leases, the weighted average remaining lease term was 23.5 years and ~~2015,~~ the ~~only changes in AOCI, net of tax, were~~weighted average discount rate was 2.59%.

The following table presents lease expenses and supplemental cash flow information related to ~~unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities~~the Company's leases for fiscal year 2020 (dollars in thousands).


Operating lease expense	$	1,511
Variable lease expense	201
Short-term lease expense	17
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities	1,357

The following table presents future minimum payments, rounded to the nearest thousand, for operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year as of September 30, 2020 (dollars in thousands):



Fiscal year 2021	1,192
Fiscal year 2022	1,302
Fiscal year 2023	1,210
Fiscal year 2024	1,003
Fiscal year 2025	827
Thereafter	15,308
Total future minimum lease payments	20,842
Amounts representing interest	(6,129)
Present value of net future minimum lease payments	$	14,713

The Company elected the modified retrospective approach for its adoption of ASU 2016-02, and ~~there~~the optional transition method under which the Company used the effective date as the date of initial application of the amendments. These elections require the inclusion of ASC Topic 840 disclosures for periods that continue to be presented in accordance with ASC Topic 840. As of September 30, 2019, future minimum rental commitments, rounded to the nearest thousand, required under operating leases that had initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year were ~~no amounts reclassified from AOCI.~~as follows (dollars in thousands):


2020	$	1,298
2021	1,187
2022	1,069
2023	930
2024	637
Thereafter	1,115
	$	6,236

134

For the Year Ended September 30, 2017
Unrealized Unrealized
Gains (Losses) Gains (Losses)
on AFS on Cash Flow Total
Securities Hedges AOCI
(dollars in thousands)
Balance at October 1, 2016 $ 5,915
$ —
$ 5,915
Other comprehensive income (loss), before reclassifications (2,625 ) (506 ) (3,131 )
Amount reclassified from AOCI —
134
134
Other comprehensive income (loss) (2,625 ) (372 ) (2,997 )
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 3,290
$ (372 ) $ 2,918

~~15.~~19. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following table presents summarized quarterly data for each of the years indicated for the Company.


	First		Second		Third		Fourth
	Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Total
	(Dollars and counts in thousands, except per share amounts)
2020
Total interest and dividend income	$	80,036	$	78,955	$	74,381	$	71,606	$	304,978
Net interest and dividend income	48,697		48,668		46,287		45,683		189,335
Provision for credit losses	225		22,075		0		0		22,300
Net income	22,511		4,276		19,474		18,279		64,540
Basic EPS	0.16		0.03		0.14		0.13		0.47
Diluted EPS	0.16		0.03		0.14		0.13		0.47
Dividends declared per share	0.425		0.085		0.085		0.085		0.68
Average number of basic shares outstanding	137,898		137,968		138,018		137,705		137,897
Average number of diluted shares outstanding	137,976		138,000		138,018		137,705		137,901


2019
Total interest and dividend income	$	82,421	$	82,037	$	82,211	$	83,285	$	329,954
Net interest and dividend income	52,301		52,597		51,681		49,811		206,390
Provision for credit losses	0		0		450		300		750
Net income	24,383		24,554		22,897		22,409		94,243
Basic EPS	0.18		0.18		0.17		0.16		0.68
Diluted EPS	0.18		0.18		0.17		0.16		0.68
Dividends declared per share	0.475		0.085		0.335		0.085		0.98
Average number of basic shares outstanding	137,551		137,635		137,720		137,801		137,677
Average number of diluted shares outstanding	137,592		137,691		137,788		137,867		137,735

135

First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
(Dollars and counts in thousands, except per share amounts)
2017
Total interest and dividend income $ 75,322
$ 77,660
$ 79,630
$ 80,574
$ 313,186
Net interest and dividend income 47,306
49,054
49,364
49,658
195,382
Provision for credit losses —
—
—
—
—
Net income 20,578
21,587
21,370
20,602
84,137
Basic EPS 0.15
0.16
0.16
0.15
0.63
Diluted EPS 0.15
0.16
0.16
0.15
0.63
Dividends declared per share 0.375
0.085
0.335
0.085
0.88
Average number of basic shares outstanding 133,697
134,066
134,254
134,314
134,082
Average number of diluted shares outstanding 133,950
134,259
134,360
134,404
134,244

2016
Total interest and dividend income $ 74,359
$ 75,632
$ 75,527
$ 75,595
$ 301,113
Net interest and dividend income 47,982
48,538
47,930
47,732
192,182
Provision for credit losses —
—
—
(750 ) (750 )
Net income 20,718
21,527
20,551
20,698
83,494
Basic EPS 0.16
0.16
0.15
0.16
0.63
Diluted EPS 0.16
0.16
0.15
0.16
0.63
Dividends declared per share 0.335
0.085
0.335
0.085
0.84
Average number of basic shares outstanding 132,822
132,960
133,102
133,296
133,045
Average number of diluted shares outstanding 132,911
133,031
133,251
133,493
133,176

~~16.~~20. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)

The Company serves as the holding company for the Bank (see "Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies"). The Company's (parent company only) balance sheets at the dates presented, and the related statements of income and cash flows for each of the years presented are as follows:


BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 and 2019
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	2020		2019
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	82,466	$	126,320
Investment in the Bank	1,165,813		1,168,986
Note receivable - ESOP	38,614		39,971
Other assets	707		711
Income taxes receivable, net	492		429

TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,288,092	$	1,336,417

LIABILITIES:


Accounts payable and accrued expenses	3,142		91
Deferred income tax liabilities, net	91		0
Total liabilities	3,233		91

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued or outstanding	0		0
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,400,000,000 shares authorized, 138,956,296 and 141,440,030 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively	1,389		1,414
Additional paid-in capital	1,189,853		1,210,226
Unearned compensation - ESOP	(33,040)		(34,692)
Retained earnings	143,162		174,277
AOCI, net of tax	(16,505)		(14,899)
Total stockholders' equity	1,284,859		1,336,326
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,288,092	$	1,336,417

136

BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 and 2016
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

2017
2016
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 120,785
$ 108,197
Investment in the Bank 1,204,781
1,240,827
Note receivable - ESOP 42,557
43,790
Other assets 365
389
TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,368,488
$ 1,393,203

LIABILITIES:
Income taxes payable, net $ 88
$ 128
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 52
74
Deferred income tax liabilities, net 35
37
Total liabilities 175
239

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding —
—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,400,000,000 shares authorized, 138,223,835 and 137,486,172
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively 1,382
1,375
Additional paid-in capital 1,167,368
1,156,855
Unearned compensation - ESOP (37,995 ) (39,647 )
Retained earnings 234,640
268,466
AOCI, net of tax 2,918
5,915
Total stockholders' equity 1,368,313
1,392,964
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 1,368,488
$ 1,393,203


STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018
(Dollars in thousands)

	2020		2019		2018

INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Dividend income from the Bank	$	68,329	$	129,409	$	134,540
Interest income from other investments	2,036		2,428		1,951

Total interest and dividend income	70,365		131,837		136,491
INTEREST EXPENSE	0		403		62
NET INTEREST INCOME	70,365		131,434		136,429
NON-INTEREST INCOME	0		14		0
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	988		829		1,031
Regulatory and outside services	292		286		1,129
Other non-interest expense	622		652		581
Total non-interest expense	1,902		1,767		2,741
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EQUITY IN
EXCESS OF DISTRIBUTION OVER EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARY	68,463		129,681		133,688
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)	28		57		(179)
INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN EXCESS OF
DISTRIBUTION OVER EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARY	68,435		129,624		133,867
EQUITY IN EXCESS OF DISTRIBUTION OVER EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARY	(3,895)		(35,381)		(34,940)
NET INCOME	$	64,540	$	94,243	$	98,927

137

STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015
(Dollars in thousands)

2017
2016
2015
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Dividend income from the Bank $ 120,215
$ 117,513
$ 115,359
Interest income from other investments 1,715
1,725
1,835
Total interest and dividend income 121,930
119,238
117,194
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits 896
827
835
Regulatory and outside services 247
261
243
Other non-interest expense 561
558
517
Total non-interest expense 1,704
1,646
1,595
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EQUITY IN
EXCESS OF DISTRIBUTION OVER EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARY 120,226
117,592
115,599
INCOME TAX EXPENSE 4
28
84
INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN EXCESS OF
DISTRIBUTION OVER EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARY 120,222
117,564
115,515
EQUITY IN EXCESS OF DISTRIBUTION OVER EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARY (36,085 ) (34,070 ) (37,422 )
NET INCOME $ 84,137
$ 83,494
$ 78,093


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018
(Dollars in thousands)

	2020		2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	64,540	$	94,243	$	98,927
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in excess of distribution over earnings of subsidiary	3,895		35,381		34,940
Depreciation of equipment	45		37		30
Loss on disposal of premises and equipment	0		8		0


Provision for deferred income taxes	91		0		(35)
Changes in:
Other assets	(60)		54		(53)
Income taxes receivable/payable	(63)		57		(145)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	13		(86)		(257)
Net cash provided by operating activities	68,461		129,694		133,407

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Principal collected on note receivable from ESOP	1,357		1,314		1,272
Cash acquired from acquisition	0		0		18
Purchase of equipment	0		(423)		0
Proceeds from the redemption of common equity securities related to the redemption of junior subordinated debentures	0		302		0
Net cash provided by investing activities	1,357		1,193		1,290

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net payment from subsidiary related to restricted stock awards	319		1,245		253
Cash dividends paid	(93,862)		(134,929)		(118,312)
Repurchase of common stock	(20,767)		0		0
Repayment of other borrowings	0		(10,052)		0
Stock options exercised	638		1,485		261
Net cash used in financing activities	(113,672)		(142,251)		(117,798)

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(43,854)		(11,364)		16,899

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of year	126,320		137,684		120,785
End of year	$	82,466	$	126,320	$	137,684

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock issued for acquisition	$	0	$	0	$	39,113
Capital contribution to subsidiary in conjunction with acquisition of CCB	$	0	$	0	$	48,798

138

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015
(Dollars in thousands)

2017
2016
2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 84,137
$ 83,494
$ 78,093
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Equity in excess of distribution over earnings of subsidiary 36,085
34,070
37,422
Depreciation of equipment 29
30
30
Provision for deferred income taxes (2 ) 2
428
Changes in:
Other assets (5 ) 1
35
Income taxes receivable/payable (40 ) 445
3,300
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (22 ) 14
1
Net cash flows provided by operating activities 120,182
118,056
119,309

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Principal collected on notes receivable from ESOP 1,233
1,194
1,156
Net cash flows provided by investing activities 1,233
1,194
1,156

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net payment from subsidiary related to restricted stock awards 293
473
95
Dividends paid (117,963 ) (111,767 ) (114,162 )
Repurchase of common stock —
—
(50,034 )
Stock options exercised 8,843
4,070
267
Net cash flows used in financing activities (108,827 ) (107,224 ) (163,834 )

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 12,588
12,026
(43,369 )

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of year 108,197
96,171
139,540
End of year $ 120,785
$ 108,197
$ 96,171

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the "Act") as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Act). The Company's internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or untimely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial reporting. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of any system of internal control may vary over time. The design of any internal control system also factors in resource constraints and consideration for the benefit of the control relative to the cost of implementing the control. Because of these inherent limitations in any system of internal control, management cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud within the Company have been detected.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Management has concluded that the Company maintained an effective system of internal control over financial reporting based on these criteria as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's annual report, has issued an audit report on the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and it is included in Item 8.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the Company's quarter ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

139

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information required by this item concerning the Company's directors and ~~compliance with~~any delinquent reports under Section 16(a) of the Act is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in January ~~2018,~~2021, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year. Pursuant to General Instruction G(3), information concerning executive officers of the Company is included in Part I of this Form 10-K, under the caption ~~"Executive Officers of the Registrant" of this Form 10-K.~~"Information about our Executive Officers."

Information required by this item regarding the audit committee of the Company's Board of Directors, including information regarding the audit committee financial experts serving on the committee, is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in January ~~2018,~~2021, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a written code of ethics within the meaning of Item 406 of SEC Regulation S-K that applies to our principal executive officer and senior financial officers, and to all of our other employees and our directors, a copy of which is available free of charge in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.capfed.com.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information required by this item concerning compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in January ~~2018,~~2021, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information required by this item concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in January ~~2018,~~2021, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

The following table sets forth information as of September 30, ~~2017~~2020 with respect to compensation plans under which shares of our common stock may be issued.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Number of Shares

Remaining Available

for Future Issuance

Number of Shares

Under Equity

to be issued upon

Weighted Average

Compensation Plans

Exercise of

Exercise Price of

(Excluding Shares

Outstanding Options,

Reflected in the

Plan Category

Warrants and Rights

First Column)

Equity compensation plans

approved by stockholders

813,645

12.86

5,824,835

(1)

Equity compensation plans not

approved by stockholders

N/A

813,645

12.86

5,824,835

(1)This amount includes 1,625,519 shares available for future grants of restricted stock under the Equity Incentive Plan.

140

Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of Shares
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Number of Shares Under Equity
to be issued upon Weighted Average Compensation Plans
Exercise of Exercise Price of (Excluding Shares
Outstanding Options, Outstanding Options, Reflected in the
Plan Category Warrants and Rights Warrants and Rights First Column)
Equity compensation plans
approved by stockholders 1,236,798
$ 13.31
5,941,966
⁽¹⁾
Equity compensation plans not
approved by stockholders N/A
N/A
N/A

1,236,798
$ 13.31
5,941,966


~~(1)~~	~~This amount includes 1,757,650 shares available for future grants of restricted stock under the Equity Incentive Plan.~~

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information required by this item concerning certain relationships, related transactions and director independence is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in January ~~2018~~2021, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Information required by this item concerning principal accounting fees and services is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in January ~~2018,~~2021, a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements:

The following financial statements are included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K:


1.	~~Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.~~


2.	~~Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017 and 2016.~~


3.	~~Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015.~~


4.	~~Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015.~~


5.	~~Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015.~~


6.	~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015.~~


7.	~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended September 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015.~~

1.Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

2.Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2020 and 2019.

3.Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

4.Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

5.Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

6.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

7.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended September 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules:

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the information is not required under the related instructions or is not applicable.

(3) Exhibits:

See "Index to Exhibits."

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None

141

INDEX TO EXHIBITS



Exhibit Number		Document
3(i)		Charter of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., as filed on May 6, 2010, as Exhibit 3(i) to Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-166578) and incorporated herein by reference
3(ii)		Bylaws of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., as amended, filed on ~~September~~March 30, ~~2016,~~2020, as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K for Capitol Federal Financial Inc. and incorporated herein by reference
~~10.1(i)~~4		~~Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s Employee Stock Ownership Plan,~~Description of the Registrant's Securities, as ~~amended,~~ filed on ~~May 10, 2011~~November 27, 2019, as Exhibit ~~10.1(ii)~~4 to the ~~March 31, 2011~~Registrant's Annual Report on Form ~~10-Q for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.,~~10-K and incorporated herein by reference
~~10.1(ii)~~10.1(i)		Form of Change of Control Agreement with each of John B. Dicus, Kent G. Townsend, and Rick C. Jackson filed on January 20, 2011 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference
~~10.1(iii)~~10.1(ii)		Form of Change of Control Agreement with ~~each of~~ Natalie G. Haag ~~and Carlton A. Ricketts~~ filed on November 29, 2012 as Exhibit 10.1(iv) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference
~~10.1(iv)~~10.1(iii)		Form of Change of Control Agreement with Daniel L. Lehman filed on November 29, 2016 as Exhibit 10.1(v) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference
10.1(iv)		Form of Change of Control Agreement with Robert D. Kobbeman filed on November 29, 2018 as Exhibit 10.1(iv) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference
10.1(v)		Employment Agreement with Robert D. Kobbeman, as amended, filed on November 29, 2018 as Exhibit 10.1(v) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference
10.1(vi)		Form of Change of Control Agreement with Anthony S. Barry filed on May 10, 2019 as Exhibit 10.1(vi) to the Registrant's March 31, 2019 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.2		Capitol Federal Financial's 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "Stock Option Plan") filed on April 13, 2000 as Appendix A to Capitol Federal Financial's Revised Proxy Statement (File No. 000-25391) and incorporated herein by reference
10.3		Capitol Federal Financial Deferred Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended, filed on May ~~5, 2009~~8, 2020 as Exhibit ~~10.4~~10.3 to the Registrant's March 31, ~~2009~~2020 Form 10-Q ~~for Capitol Federal Financial~~ and incorporated herein by reference
10.4		Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Option Plan filed on February 4, 2005 as Exhibit 10.5 to the December 31, 2004 Form 10-Q for Capitol Federal Financial and incorporated herein by reference
10.5		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Option Plan filed on February 4, 2005 as Exhibit 10.6 to the December 31, 2004 Form 10-Q for Capitol Federal Financial and incorporated herein by reference
10.6		Description of Director Fee Arrangements filed on ~~August 1, 2014~~November 29, 2018 as Exhibit ~~10.9~~10.6 to the Registrant's ~~June~~September 30, ~~2014~~2018 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference
10.7		Short-term Performance Plan, as amended, filed on May 8, 2020 as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant's March 31, 2020 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
~~10.7~~10.8		~~Short-term Performance Plan filed on August 4, 2015 as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant's June 30, 2015 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference~~
~~10.8~~	Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Incentive Plan") filed on December 22, 2011 as Appendix A to Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s Proxy Statement (File No. 001-34814) and incorporated herein by reference
10.9		Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan filed on February 6, 2012 as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant's December 31, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.10		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan filed on February 6, 2012 as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant's December 31, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.11		Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan filed on February 6, 2012 as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant's December 31, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.12		Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan filed on February 6, 2012 as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's December 31, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
14		Code of Ethics*
1121		~~Calculations of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share (See "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 2. Earnings Per Share")~~
14	Code of Ethics*
21	Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1		Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made by John B. Dicus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



31.2						Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made by Kent G. Townsend, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
32						Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made by John B. Dicus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kent G. Townsend, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
101						The following information from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2020, filed with the SEC on November ~~29, 2017,~~25, 2020, has been formatted in Inline eXtensible Business Reporting ~~Language:~~Language ("XBRL"): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015,~~2018, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015,~~2018, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015,~~2018, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2017, 2016,~~2020, 2019, and ~~2015,~~2018, and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
104						Cover Page Interactive Data File, formatted in Inline XBRL and included in Exhibit 101

*May be obtained free of charge in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.capfed.com.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the ~~Registrant~~registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


				CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC.


~~CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC.~~



	Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020	By:	/s/ John B. Dicus
					John B. Dicus, Chairman, President and
					Chief Executive Officer
					(Principal Executive Officer)



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the ~~Registrant~~registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

By:			/s/ John B. Dicus	By:	~~/s/ Reginald L. Robinson~~
	~~John B. Dicus, Chairman, President~~		~~Reginald L. Robinson, Director~~
	~~and Chief Executive Officer~~		~~Date: November 29, 2017~~
	~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~
	~~Date: November 29, 2017~~	~~By:~~	/s/ Michael T. McCoy, M.D.
			John B. Dicus, Chairman, President		Michael T. McCoy, M.D., Director
~~By:~~			and Chief Executive Officer		Date: November 25, 2020
			(Principal Executive Officer)
			Date: November 25, 2020	By:	/s/ James G. Morris
					James G. Morris, Director
By:			/s/ Kent G. Townsend		Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020
			Kent G. Townsend, Executive Vice President,
			Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer	By:	/s/ ~~James G. Morris~~Michel' P. Cole
			(Principal Financial Officer)		~~James G. Morris,~~Michel' P. Cole, Director
			Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020		Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020

By:			/s/ Jeffrey R. Thompson	By:	/s/ ~~Michel' P. Cole~~Carlton A. Ricketts
			Jeffrey R. Thompson, Director		~~Michel' P. Cole,~~Carlton A. Ricketts, Director
			Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020		Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020

By:			/s/ Jeffrey M. Johnson	By:	/s/ Tara D. Van Houweling
			Jeffrey M. Johnson, Director		Tara D. Van Houweling, First Vice President
			Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020		and Reporting Director
					(Principal Accounting Officer)
By:			/s/ Morris J. Huey II		Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020
			Morris J. Huey II, Director
			Date: November ~~29, 2017~~25, 2020



Maryland			27-2631712
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
700 South Kansas Avenue, ~~Topeka, Kansas~~	Topeka,	Kansas	66603
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)



~~Securities~~Title of each class		Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered ~~pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:~~
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		CFFN	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
~~(Title of Class)~~	~~(Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered)~~



~~Large accelerated filer~~ þ	~~Accelerated filer~~ ¨	~~Non-accelerated filer~~ ¨ ~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~
~~Smaller Reporting Company~~ ¨		~~Emerging Growth Company~~ ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨


							Page No.
PART I			Item 1.		Business		2
			Item 1A.		Risk Factors		32
			Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments		39
			Item 2.		Properties		39
			Item 3.		Legal Proceedings		39
			Item 4.		Mine Safety Disclosures		39


PART II						~~Page No.~~
~~PART I~~	Item 1.5.	~~Business~~		2
	~~Item 1A.~~	~~Risk Factors~~	32
	~~Item 1B.~~	~~Unresolved Staff Comments~~	37
	~~Item 2.~~	~~Properties~~	37
	~~Item 3.~~	~~Legal Proceedings~~	37
	~~Item 4.~~	~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~	37


~~PART II~~	~~Item 5.~~	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	3840
			Item 6.		Selected Financial Data		4042
			Item 7.		Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		4244
			Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		7778
			Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		8485
			Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		~~129~~139
			Item 9A.		Controls and Procedures		~~129~~139
			Item 9B.		Other Information		~~129~~139


PART III			Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		~~130~~140
			Item 11.		Executive Compensation		~~130~~140
			Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		~~130~~140
			Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		~~131~~141
			Item 14.		Principal Accounting Fees and Services		~~131~~141


PART IV			Item 15.		Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		~~131~~141
			Item 16.		Form 10-K Summary		141


INDEX TO EXHIBITS							~~132~~142


SIGNATURES							~~134~~144



FISCAL YEAR 2017	HIGH		LOW		DIVIDENDS
First Quarter	$	17.04	$	13.82	$	0.375
Second Quarter	16.98		14.17		0.085
Third Quarter	15.07		13.55		0.335
Fourth Quarter	14.94		13.21		0.085

FISCAL YEAR 2016	HIGH		LOW		DIVIDENDS
First Quarter	$	13.36	$	11.82	$	0.335
Second Quarter	13.47		11.39		0.085
Third Quarter	13.95		12.70		0.335
Fourth Quarter	14.49		13.52		0.085



					Approximate
	Total			Total Number of	Dollar Value of
	Number of	Average		Shares Purchased as	Shares that May
	Shares	Price Paid		Part of Publicly	Yet Be Purchased
	Purchased	per Share		Announced Plans	Under the Plan
July 1, 2017 through
July 31, 2017	—	$	—	—	$	70,000,000
August 1, 2017 through
August 31, 2017	—	—		—	70,000,000
September 1, 2017 through
September 30, 2017	—	—		—	70,000,000
Total	—	—		—	70,000,000



	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2015						2014
	Actual		Leverage		Adjusted		Actual		Leverage		Adjusted
	(GAAP)		Strategy		(Non-GAAP)		(GAAP)		Strategy		(Non-GAAP)
Return on average assets	0.70	%	(0.13	)%	0.83	%	0.82	%	(0.03	)%	0.85	%
Return on average equity	5.32		0.19		5.13		5.00		0.03		4.97
Net interest margin	1.73		(0.34	)	2.07		2.00		(0.07	)	2.07
Average interest rate spread	1.59		(0.28	)	1.87		1.79		(0.05	)	1.84



	September 30, 2017					September 30, 2016
	Amount			Rate		Amount			Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family:
Originated	$	3,959,232		3.70	%	$	4,005,615		3.74	%
Correspondent purchased	2,445,311			3.53		2,206,072			3.50
Bulk purchased	351,705			2.29		416,653			2.23
Construction	30,647			3.45		39,430			3.45
Total	6,786,895			3.56		6,667,770			3.56
Commercial:
Permanent	183,030			4.24		110,768			4.16
Construction	86,952			3.80		43,375			4.13
Total	269,982			4.10		154,143			4.15
Total real estate loans	7,056,877			3.58		6,821,913			3.58

Consumer loans:
Home equity	122,066			5.40		123,345			5.01
Other	3,808			4.05		4,264			4.21
Total consumer loans	125,874			5.36		127,609			4.99
Total loans receivable	7,182,751			3.61		6,949,522			3.60

Less:
ACL	8,398					8,540
Discounts/unearned loan fees	24,962					24,933
Premiums/deferred costs	(45,680		)			(41,975		)
Total loans receivable, net	$	7,195,071				$	6,958,024



	For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2017					June 30, 2017					March 31, 2017					December 31, 2016
	Amount			Rate		Amount			Rate		Amount			Rate		Amount			Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	7,228,425		3.60	%	$	7,182,346		3.59	%	$	7,061,557		3.58	%	$	6,949,522		3.60	%
Originated and refinanced:
Fixed	102,687			3.82		116,422			3.94		115,560			3.66		176,554			3.26
Adjustable	44,900			4.10		59,372			3.87		36,417			3.82		46,566			3.54
Purchased and participations:
Fixed	76,906			3.92		135,041			3.97		143,852			3.69		187,674			3.52
Adjustable	17,046			3.33		17,930			3.24		27,158			2.98		25,262			2.73
Change in undisbursed loan funds	21,823					13,648					37,862					3,696
Repayments	(307,909		)			(295,988		)			(239,072		)			(326,839		)
Principal recoveries (charge-offs), net	(88		)			39					(74		)			(19		)
Other	(1,039		)			(385		)			(914		)			(859		)
Ending balance	$	7,182,751		3.61		$	7,228,425		3.60		$	7,182,346		3.59		$	7,061,557		3.58



	FHLB		Repurchase
Maturity by	Advances		Agreements		Total		Contractual		Effective
Fiscal Year	Amount		Amount		Amount		Rate		Rate⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)
2018	$	475,000	$	100,000	$	575,000	2.16	%	2.55	%
2019	500,000		—		500,000		1.56		1.69
2020	350,000		100,000		450,000		2.11		2.11
2021	550,000		—		550,000		2.27		2.27
2022	200,000		—		200,000		2.23		2.23
2023	100,000		—		100,000		1.82		1.82
	$	2,175,000	$	200,000	$	2,375,000	2.04		2.16



	Retail				Public Unit				Term
Maturity by	Certificate		Repricing		Deposit		Repricing		Borrowings		Repricing				Repricing
Quarter End	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate		Total		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2017	$	250,913	1.01	%	$	149,081	1.11	%	$	200,000	2.94	%	$	599,994	1.68	%
March 31, 2018	218,141		1.09		82,462		1.19		—		—		300,603		1.12
June 30, 2018	208,676		1.04		35,721		1.24		100,000		2.82		344,397		1.57
September 30, 2018	150,208		1.09		21,213		1.22		275,000		2.17		446,421		1.76
	$	827,938	1.05		$	288,477	1.16		$	575,000	2.55		$	1,691,415	1.58



	For the Year Ended September 30,
	2017 vs. 2016									2016 vs. 2015
	Increase (Decrease) Due to									Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable	$	13,480		$	(3,398	)	$	10,082		$	13,496		$	(5,685	)	$	7,811
MBS	(6,083		)	98			(5,985		)	(5,815		)	(1,038		)	(6,853		)
Investment securities	(1,783		)	220			(1,563		)	(1,515		)	258			(1,257		)
FHLB stock	(753		)	734			(19		)	(261		)	(43		)	(304		)
Cash and cash equivalents	(252		)	9,810			9,558			114			4,240			4,354
Total interest-earning assets	4,609			7,464			12,073			6,019			(2,268		)	3,751

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking	15			(5		)	10			22			(4		)	18
Savings	38			143			181			33			108			141
Money market	81			25			106			64			18			82
Certificates of deposit	1,067			3,745			4,812			2,057			2,442			4,499
FHLB borrowings	(5,262		)	9,042			3,780			(2,280		)	(426		)	(2,706		)
Repurchase agreements	(8		)	(8		)	(16		)	(467		)	(230		)	(697		)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	(4,069		)	12,942			8,873			(571		)	1,908			1,337

Net change in net interest income	$	8,678		$	(5,478	)	$	3,200		$	6,590		$	(4,176	)	$	2,414



	Loans⁽¹⁾				MBS				Investment Securities				Total
	Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Amounts due:
Within one year	$	58,591	3.71	%	$	2,884	3.92	%	$	127,394	1.18	%	$	188,869	2.01	%

After one year:
Over one to two years	82,750		4.04		6,156		4.29		54,123		1.24		143,029		2.99
Over two to three years	14,348		4.10		3,168		4.69		57,196		1.52		74,712		2.15
Over three to five years	40,267		4.25		49,444		2.85		60,140		1.50		149,851		2.68
Over five to ten years	560,361		3.73		447,420		2.07		218		2.00		1,007,999		2.99
Over ten to fifteen years	1,385,085		3.28		124,498		1.83		—		—		1,509,583		3.16
After fifteen years	5,041,349		3.64		308,877		2.59		2,051		2.58		5,352,277		3.58
Total due after one year	7,124,160		3.59		939,563		2.27		173,728		1.44		8,237,451		3.39

	$	7,182,751	3.59		$	942,447	2.28		$	301,122	1.33		$	8,426,320	3.36



CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 and 2016 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	2017			2016
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents (includes interest-earning deposits of $340,748 and $267,829)	$	351,659		$	281,764
Securities:
Available-for-sale ("AFS"), at estimated fair value (amortized cost of $410,541 and $517,791)	415,831			527,301
Held-to-maturity ("HTM"), at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $833,009
and $1,122,867)	827,738			1,100,874
Loans receivable, net (allowance for credit losses ("ACL") of $8,398 and $8,540)	7,195,071			6,958,024
Federal Home Loan Bank Topeka ("FHLB") stock, at cost	100,954			109,970
Premises and equipment, net	84,818			83,221
Other assets	216,845			206,093
TOTAL ASSETS	$	9,192,916		$	9,267,247

LIABILITIES:
Deposits	$	5,309,868		$	5,164,018
FHLB borrowings	2,173,808			2,372,389
Repurchase agreements	200,000			200,000
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	63,749			62,643
Income taxes payable, net	530			310
Deferred income tax liabilities, net	24,458			25,374
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	52,190			49,549
Total liabilities	7,824,603			7,874,283

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,400,000,000 shares authorized, 138,223,835 and 137,486,172
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively	1,382			1,375
Additional paid-in capital	1,167,368			1,156,855
Unearned compensation, Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP")	(37,995		)	(39,647		)
Retained earnings	234,640			268,466
Accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), net of tax	2,918			5,915
Total stockholders' equity	1,368,313			1,392,964
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	9,192,916		$	9,267,247


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



	For the Year Ended September 30, 2016
	Number	Pre-		Post-
	of	Restructured		Restructured
	Contracts	Outstanding		Outstanding
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated	122	$	17,201	$	17,557
One- to four-family - correspondent	12	2,592		2,619
One- to four-family - bulk purchased	3	596		594
Commercial real estate	—	—		—
Consumer - home equity	19	427		433
Consumer - other	1	8		8
	157	$	20,824	$	21,211



	For the Year Ended September 30, 2015
	Number	Pre-		Post-
	of	Restructured		Restructured
	Contracts	Outstanding		Outstanding
	(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated	141	$	17,265	$	17,468
One- to four-family - correspondent	2	546		542
One- to four-family - bulk purchased	4	1,140		1,144
Commercial real estate	—	—		—
Consumer - home equity	22	479		485
Consumer - other	3	12		12
	172	$	19,442	$	19,651



2018	$	1,170
2019	1,057
2020	813
2021	703
2022	623
Thereafter	1,906
	$	6,272



BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 and 2016
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	2017			2016
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	120,785		$	108,197
Investment in the Bank	1,204,781			1,240,827
Note receivable - ESOP	42,557			43,790
Other assets	365			389
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,368,488		$	1,393,203

LIABILITIES:
Income taxes payable, net	$	88		$	128
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	52			74
Deferred income tax liabilities, net	35			37
Total liabilities	175			239

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,400,000,000 shares authorized, 138,223,835 and 137,486,172
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively	1,382			1,375
Additional paid-in capital	1,167,368			1,156,855
Unearned compensation - ESOP	(37,995		)	(39,647		)
Retained earnings	234,640			268,466
AOCI, net of tax	2,918			5,915
Total stockholders' equity	1,368,313			1,392,964
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,368,488		$	1,393,203