UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 20162018

 

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period ___________________ to ____________________

 

Commission File Number:001-33177

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

(Exact name ofregistrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland 22-1897375
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

 

3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-D, Freehold, NJ   07728

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)            (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(732)-577-9996732-577-9996

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share – New York Stock Exchange

7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, $25 liquidation value per share – New York Stock Exchange

6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, $25 liquidation value per share – New York Stock Exchange

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[X] Yes [  ] Yes [X] No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

[  ] Yes [X] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X]

[X] Yes [  ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[X] [X] Yes [  ] No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:Act.

 

 Large accelerated filer[X] [X]Accelerated filer[  ]
 Non-accelerated filer[  ]Smaller reporting company[  ]
 Emerging growth company [  ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [  ] Yes [X] No

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant at March 31, 20162018 was approximately $715,934,000$1,138,940,000 (based on the $11.89$15.04 closing price per share of common stock on March 31, 2016)29, 2018).

 

There were 69,902,49291,587,713 shares of Common Stockcommon stock outstanding as of November 15, 2016.2018.

 

 Documents Incorporated by Reference: None.

 

 

 
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item No.

 

Page No.

 Part I 
1Business.3
1ARisk Factors.8
1BUnresolved Staff Comments.16
2Properties.17
3Legal Proceedings.25
4Mine Safety Disclosures.25
   
 Part II 
5Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

 

26

6Selected Financial Data.29
7Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.31
7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.57
8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.59
9Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.60
9AControls and Procedures.60
9BOther Information.61
   
 Part III 
10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.62
11Executive Compensation.66
12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.83
13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.85
14Principal Accounting Fees and Services.86
   
 Part IV 
15Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.88
   
 Signatures148

Item No. Page No.
 Part I 
1Business.3
1ARisk Factors.8
1BUnresolved Staff Comments.16
2Properties.17
3Legal Proceedings.25
4Mine Safety Disclosures.25
   
 Part II 
5Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.26
6Selected Financial Data.28
7Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.30
7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.56
8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.58
9Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.59
9AControls and Procedures.59
9BOther Information.60
   
 Part III 
10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.61
11Executive Compensation.66
12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.87
13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.89
14Principal Accountant Fees and Services.90
   
 Part IV 
15Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.91
   
 Signatures152

 

 2 
Table of Contents

PART I

 

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

 

General Development of the Business

 

In this 10-K, “we”, “us”, “our”, “MREIC” or “the Company”, refers to Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, together with its predecessors and subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

 

The Company isWe are a corporation operatingthat qualifies as a qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The Company has been a REIT since 1969Our investment focus is to own well-located, modern, single tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. We were founded in 1968 and intendsare one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world. We intend to maintain itsour qualification as a REIT in the future. As a qualified REIT, with limited exceptions, the Companywe will not be taxed under Federal and certain state income tax laws at the corporate level on taxable income that it distributeswe distribute to itsour shareholders. For special tax provisions applicable to REITs, refer to Sections 856-860 of the Code. We are subject to franchise taxes in several of the states in which we own properties.

 

The CompanyIn December 2017, as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the TCJA), Code Section 199A, was added to the Code and became effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026. Under the TCJA, subject to certain income limitations, an individual taxpayer and estates and trusts may deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of qualified REIT dividends they receive from their taxable income. Qualified REIT dividends do not include any portion of a dividend received from a REIT that is classified as a capital gain dividend or qualified dividend income.

We were established in 1968 as a New Jersey Business Trust (NJBT). In 1990, the NJBT merged into a newly formed Delaware corporation. On May 15, 2003, the Companywe changed itsour state of incorporation from Delaware to Maryland by merging with and into a Maryland corporation (the Reincorporation).corporation.

 

Narrative Description of Business

 

The Company’sOur primary business is the ownership of real estate. ItsOur investment focus is to own well-located, modern, single tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. In addition, the Company ownswe own a portfolio of REIT investment securities which the Companywe generally limitslimit to no more than approximately 10% of itsour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).

 

As of September 30, 2018, we had 14 full-time employees and one part-time employee.

At September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we held investments in ninety-nine111 properties totaling approximately 16,010,00021,174,000 square feet with an occupancy rate of 99.6% (See Item 2 for a detailed description of the properties). These properties are located in thirty30 states: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. All of these properties are wholly-owned with the exception of the two properties in New Jersey in which the Company ownswe own a majority interest. All properties in which the Company haswe have investments are leased on a net basis except an industrial park in Monaca (Pittsburgh), Pennsylvania and the shopping center located in Somerset, New Jersey.

 

During fiscal 2016, the Company2018, we purchased eightseven industrial properties totaling approximately 1,830,0002,655,000 square feet with net-leased terms ranging from ten10 to fifteen15 years resulting in a weighted average lease maturity of 12.311.4 years. Approximately 1,567,0002,255,000 square feet, or 86%85% of the properties purchased, are leased to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries, of which, approximately 761,000 square feet, or 29%, is leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX) or FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., a subsidiary of FedEx Corporation (FDX).FDX. The aggregate purchase price for the eightseven properties was approximately $210,747,000 and they$282,332,000. These properties are located in Colorado,Alabama, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, PennsylvaniaGeorgia, Oklahoma and Washington.South Carolina. These eightseven properties generate annualized rental income over the life of their leases of approximately $14,076,000. The funds for these eight acquisitions were provided by eight property level$17,414,000. In connection with the seven properties acquired during the 2018 fiscal year, we entered into four 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans, totaling $141,586,000, draws ontwo 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans and one 10 year loan amortizing over 18 years. The seven mortgage loans originally totaled $175,160,000 with an unsecured lineoriginal weighted average mortgage loan maturity of credit facility14.1 years and cash on hand. The eight mortgages have a weighted average interest rate of 3.85% and a weighted average maturity of 14.9 years.

Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 17, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 338,584 square foot industrial building located in Hamburg, NY, which is in the Buffalo Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)3.91%. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen years through March 2031. The purchase price was $35,100,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $23,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.03%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,308,000.

 

 3 
Table of Contents

 

In addition, subsequent

On October 1, 2018, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.17 per share, to be paid on December 17, 2018, to common shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2018, which represents an annualized common dividend rate of $0.68 per share. We intend to pay these distributions from cash flows from operations.

We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 27 consecutive years. On October 1, 2015, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly common stock cash dividend from $0.15 per share to $0.16 per share representing a 6.7% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. Then again, most recently, on October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly common stock cash dividend and from $0.16 per share to $0.17 per share on October 2, 2017, representing a 6.3% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. These two dividend raises represent a total increase of 13%.

Our common stock dividend policy is dependent upon our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, availability and cost of bank financing and other factors considered relevant by the Board of Directors. It is our intention to continue making comparable quarterly distributions in the future and to grow our distributions over time.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2016,19, 2018, we purchased a 50,741newly constructed 347,145 square foot expansion of aindustrial building, leasedsituated on 62.0 acres, located in Trenton, NJ. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Edinburg, TXfor 15 years through June 2032. The purchase price was substantially completed for$85,248,352. We obtained a cost15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $4,988,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 through September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $5.27 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000, or $6.68 per square foot.

On October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building, (which increased our occupancy rate from 99.6% to 100.0%), consisting of a 59,425 square foot industrial building situated on 4.78 acres located in White Bear Lake, MN for approximately $4,272,000, which is the Company’s approximate U.S. GAAP net book carrying value.$5,328,000.

 

The industrial propertiesproperty purchased expanded and soldthus far during fiscal 2017 to date2019 increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 16,340,000 and increased our occupancy rate to 100.0%.21,521,000.

 

In addition to the property purchased subsequent to theour fiscal yearend, as described above, we have entered into agreements to purchase eighttwo new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Florida, Michigan,Georgia and North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina totalingconsisting of approximately 2,099,000398,000 square feet, each with net-leased terms ranging between tenfrom 10 to fifteen15 years, with a weighted average lease maturityterm of 13.313.4 years. Approximately 1,267,000 square feet, or 60%, is leased to FDX and its subsidiaries.  The purchase price for the eightthese properties is approximately $212,373,000.$68,747,000 and both are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing these eight transactions during the first quarter of fiscal 20172019 and fiscal 2018.2020.  In connection with fiveone of the eightthese properties, the Company haswe have entered into commitmentsa commitment to obtain five mortgages totaling $101,204,000 at fixed rates ranging from 3.60% to 4.20%,a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $17,500,000 with a weighted averagefixed interest rate of 3.83%4.40%. EachWe currently have one 154,800 square foot property expansion in progress at our property located in Monroe, OH which is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2019 for a total project cost of these mortgagesapproximately $9,072,000. The expansion will beresult in a fifteennew 15 year fully-amortizing loan. The Companylease which will extend the prior lease expiration date from February 2030 to January 2034. In addition, the expansion will result in an increase in initial annual rent effective from the date of completion by approximately $862,000 from approximately $961,000 to approximately $1,823,000. In addition, the annual rent will increase 2% per annum. We may makehave additional acquisitions and expansions in fiscal 20172019 and fiscal 2018,2020, and the funds for these acquisitions may come from funds generated from operations, mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, sale of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP), proceeds from the At-The-Market Preferred Equity Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program), and proceeds from private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities. To the extent that funds or appropriate properties are not available, fewer acquisitions will be made.

 

Currently, the Company derives itswe derive our income primarily from real estate rental operations. Rental and Reimbursement Revenue (excluding Lease Termination Income in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015of $210,261, $-0- and 2014 of $-0-, $238,625 and $1,182,890, respectively) was $94,916,110, $77,775,497$139,161,849, $116,385,305 and $64,672,341$97,755,433 for the years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively. Total undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation) were $1,229,758,028$1,925,443,520 and $915,991,942$1,614,123,838 as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

4
Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we had approximately 16,010,00021,174,000 square feet of property, of which approximately 7,584,00010,083,000 square feet, or 47%48%, consisting of fifty-three60 separate stand-alone leases, were leased to FDX and its subsidiaries (6%(7% to FDX and 41% to FDX subsidiaries). These properties are located in twenty-four24 different states. As of September 30, 2016,2018, the 60 separate stand-alone leases that are leased to FDX and FDX subsidiaries had a weighted average lease maturity of 9.4 years. As of September 30, 2018, the only tenantstenant that leased 5% or more of the Company’sour total square footage werewas FDX and(including its subsidiaries and Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, which leased approximately 862,000 square feet, comprising approximately 5% of the Company’s rental space.subsidiaries).

 

During fiscal 2016,2018, the only tenant that accounted for 5% or more of the Company’sour rental and reimbursement revenue was FDX (including its subsidiaries). The Company’sOur rental and reimbursement revenue from FDX and its subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively, totaled approximately $80,726,000, $68,151,000 and $52,793,000, $41,954,000 and $35,007,000, or 56%58% (7% from FDX and 49%51% from FDX subsidiaries), 54% (8%59% (7% from FDX and 46%52% from FDX subsidiaries) and 54% (10%55% (9% from FDX and 44%46% from FDX subsidiaries), of total rent and reimbursement revenues.

 

FDX is a publicly-owned company and financial information related to this entity is available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. FDX is rated “BBB” by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and is rated “Baa2” by Moody’s (www.moodys.com), which are both considered “Investment Grade” ratings. The references in this report to the SEC’s website, S&P Global Ratings’ website and Moody’s website are not intended to and do not include or incorporate by reference into this report the information of FDX, S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on such websites.

In addition to real estate property holdings, the Companywe held $73,604,894$154,920,545 in marketable REIT securities at September 30, 2016,2018, representing 5.3%8.0% of the Company’sour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). These liquid real estate holdings are not included in calculating the tenant concentration ratios above and therefore further enhance the Company’sincrease our diversification. As a result, theThe securities portfolio provides the Companyus with additional diversification, liquidity, diversification,and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available.

 

4
Table of Contents

The Company’sOur weighted-average lease expiration was 7.48.1 years and 7.27.9 years as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and itsour average annualized rent per occupied square foot as of September 30, 20162018 and 20152017 was $5.72$6.01 and $5.48,$5.93, respectively. The Company’sOur occupancy rate as of September 30, 20162018 and 20152017 was 99.6% and 97.7%99.3%, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building for $4,272,000 which increased our occupancy rate to 100.0%.

 

The Company competesWe compete with other investors in real estate for attractive investment opportunities. These investors include other equity real estate investment trusts, limited partnerships, syndications and private investors, among others. Competition in the market areas in which the Company operateswe operate is significant and affects the Company’sour ability to acquire or expand properties, occupancy levels, rental rates, and operating expenses of certain properties. Management hasWe have built long-term relationships withwithin our tenant base as well as within the merchant builders whichbuilder community. These relationships have historically provided the Companyus with investment opportunities that fit the Company’sour investment policy. The amount of new construction of industrial properties on the national level has been increasing the past foursix years following several years of historically low levels of new supply. These levels of new supply, although increasing, continue to be below historical norms. Driven to a large extent by the rampantcontinued growth in ecommerce sales, demand for industrial space remains very strong, driving national occupancy rates to an all-time high of 95% currently. For further discussion of potential impact of competitive conditions on our business, see Item 1A: Risk Factors below.

 

Industrial space demand is very closely correlated to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth. Despite nine years of unprecedented monetary stimulus, real annual GDP growth averaged less than 2.0% over this period. Economic growth has been strong this past year further increasing demand for industrial space. The Companymost significant demand driver for modern industrial real estate continues to be ecommerce. Every year since the turn of the century, the percentage of goods purchased on-line has increased at an average 16% annual growth rate. Today, excluding food, fuel, and autos, approximately 19% of total retail sales have migrated from traditional store sales to on-line sales and we expect this growth in market share to continue. We expect these favorable trends for the industrial real estate sector to be a leading demand driver for the foreseeable future, as consumers continue to embrace the added efficiencies of on-line consumption. The strong financial position of our tenants, together with the long duration of our leases, provides for high quality, reliable income streams throughout the business cycle.

5
Table of Contents

We continue to invest in marketable securities of other REITs, which the Companywe generally limitslimit to no more than approximately 10% of itsour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). The Company fromOur investments in equity securities of other REITs provide us with additional diversification, liquidity, and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available. From time to time, we may purchase these securities on margin when the dividendinterest and interestdividend yields exceed the cost of funds. In general, we may borrow up to 50% of the funds.value of the marketable securities, which was $154,920,545 as of September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no draws against2018, we had borrowings of $26,608,676 under our margin line, bearing interest at 2.75%. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin.margin loan. As of September 30, 2017, we had borrowings of $10,091,417 under our margin line, bearing interest at 2.05%. The REIT securities portfolio provides us with additional income, and to the extent not pledged to secure borrowings, provides the Companyus with additional liquidity and additional income.liquidity. Such securities are subject to risks arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, primarily market price risk relating to equity securities and interest rate risk relating to debt securities and market price risk relating to equity securities. From time to time, the Companywe may use derivative instruments to mitigate interest rate risk, however, this has not occurred during any periods presented. At September 30, 20162018 and 2015, the Company2017, we had $73,604,894$154,920,545 and $54,541,237,$123,764,770, respectively, of securities available for sale. The unrealized net gain (loss) on securities available for sale at September 30, 20162018 and 20152017 was $12,942,267$(24,744,579) and $(5,441,603),$6,570,565, respectively, resulting in an increasea decrease for the fiscal year of $18,383,870.$31,315,144. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company’sour net realized gains from the sale of securities were $4,398,599, $805,513$111,387, $2,311,714 and $2,166,766,$4,398,599, respectively.

 

On September 13, 2016,June 29, 2017, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or B. Riley (formerly FBR Capital Markets & Co.), that provided for the Company issued 5,400,000offer and sale of shares of aour 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, (Series C Preferred Stock) at an offering price$0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, or our 6.125% Series C preferred stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) with B. Riley that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000 of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock. We began selling shares through these programs on July 3, 2017. Since inception through September 30, 2018, we sold 3,088,001 shares under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000, of which 1,648,556 shares were sold during the fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $40,094,000. As of September 30, 2018, there is approximately $119,096,000 remaining that may be sold under the Preferred Stock ATM Program.

As of September 30, 2018, 11,488,001 shares of the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, in an underwrittenOctober 2018, we completed a public offering. The Companyoffering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discountdiscounts and all other estimated offering expenses,transaction costs, of approximately $130,543,000. On September 15, 2016, the Company used $45,000,000 of such net proceeds from the offering to reduce the amounts outstanding under its unsecured line of credit facility (the “Facility”) and on October 14, 2016, the Company used $53,493,750 of such net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of the 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of its 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (7.625% Series A Preferred Stock). In addition, on October 14, 2016, the Company used $498,540 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, to and including the redemption date of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. The Company intends to use the remaining proceeds to reduce the amounts outstanding under its Facility and to purchase properties and fund expansions of its existing properties in the ordinary course of business and for general corporate purposes.$132,339,000.

On September 14, 2016, the Company announced that it intended to redeem all 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of its 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. As discussed above, the Company redeemed the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock on October 14, 2016 at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all dividends accrued and unpaid to and including the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.23299 per share. As of September 30, 2016, the outstanding 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock has been reclassified out of stockholder’s equity and is reflected as a liability at redemption value and has recognized a deemed dividend of $2,942,149 on the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, which represents the difference between redemption value and carrying value net of original deferred issuance costs.

5
Table of Contents

 

Investment and Other Policies

 

The Company’sOur investment policy is to concentrate itsour investments in well-located, modern, single tenant,single-tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. The Company’sOur strategy is to obtain a favorable yield spread between the income from the net-leased industrial properties and interest costs. In addition, management believeswe believe that investments in well-located, modern industrial properties provide a potential for long-term capital appreciation. There is the risk that, upon expiration of leases, the properties will become vacant or will be re-leased at lower rents. The results obtained by the Company byfrom re-leasing the properties will depend on the market for industrial properties at that time. The Company has renewed all three leases, or 100%

6
Table of Contents

In fiscal 2018, approximately 8% of theour gross leasable area, representing 16 leases totaling 1,546,637 square feet, was set to expire. We have renewed 11 of the 16 leases that was scheduledwere set to expire during fiscal 2016 atexpire. One of the 11 leases, which is with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for a property located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC, renewed for only four months because the tenant moved its operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to a newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. We purchased this new facility on August 15, 2018. Excluding this four month lease renewal, the ten leases that have renewed, represent 972,048 square feet, or 63% of the expiring square footage, and have a weighted average lease term of 6.8 years. These ten lease renewals result in a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $5.87 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot also results in a weighted average lease rate of $5.87 per square foot. This represents an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 5.3%4.08% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decreasean increase in the weighted average lease rate of 2.2%2.80% on a cash basis. Five of the sixteen leases, representing 482,813 square feet or 31% of the expiring square footage, did not renew. Three of these five buildings, representing 183,837 square feet or 12% of the expiring square footage, have been sold and one of the remaining five properties, representing 218,120 square or 14% of the expiring square footage, has been re-tenanted.

 

The Company seeksWe seek to invest in well-located, modern, single tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. In management’s opinion, the newly builtrecently acquired facilities meet these criteria. The Company hasWe have a concentration of properties leased to FDX and FDX subsidiaries. This is a risk factor that shareholders should consider. FDX is a publicly-owned corporationcompany and financial information related to FDXthis entity is available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. FDX is rated “BBB” by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and is rated “Baa2” by Moody’s (www.moodys.com), which are both considered “Investment Grade” ratings. The referencereferences in this report to the SEC’s website, isS&P Global Ratings’ website and Moody’s website are not intended to and doesdo not include or incorporate by reference into this report the information of FDX, S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on this website.such websites.

 

The CompanyWe may issue securities for property; however, this has not occurred to date. The CompanyWe may repurchase or reacquire itsour shares from time to time if, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, such acquisition is advantageous to the Company.in our best interest. No shares were repurchased or reacquired during fiscal 20162018 and, as of September 30, 2016, the Company does2018, we do not own any of itsour own shares.

 

Property Management

 

Currently, all ninety-nine properties owned by the Company, withWith the exception of twothree properties, that are located in Streetsboro, Ohio and Carlstadt, New Jersey,all of our 111 properties are self-managed by the Company.us.

 

The CompanyWe paid fees directly to local property management subagents in the amount of $356,316, $306,487approximately $437,000, $394,000 and $264,811$356,000 for fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

 

Until October 31, 2014, the Company’s twoOur industrial properties in Olive Branch, Mississippi, were managed by Industrial Developments International (IDI). Management fees paid to IDI for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015Stow, OH and 2014 were $-0-, $8,274 and $49,476, respectively. These management fees were reimbursed to the Company by the tenants. Effective November 1, 2014, the Company began to self-manage these properties.

The Company’s industrial property in Streetsboro, Ohio isOH are managed by GEIS Companies (GEIS). Management fees we paid to GEIS for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015were approximately $78,000, $52,000 and 2014 were $50,082, $50,112 and $50,138,$50,000, respectively. These management fees were reimbursed to the Companyus by the tenants.

 

The Company’sOur industrial property in Carlstadt, New JerseyNJ is owned by Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLC. The Company ownsWe own 51% of Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLC. This property is managed by Marcus Associates, an entity affiliated with the owner of the 49% non-controlling interest. Management fees paid by Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLC to Marcus Associates were $15,804approximately $17,000, $16,000 and $16,000 for each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014.respectively.

6
Table of Contents

 

Environmental Matters

 

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, an owner of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under such property as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances. These liabilities may include government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances. Although generally our tenants are primarily responsible for any environmental damages and claims related to the leased premises, in the event of the bankruptcy or inability of a tenant of such premises to satisfy any obligations with respect to such environmental liability, the Companywe may be required to satisfy such obligations. In addition, as the owner of such properties, the Companywe may be held directly liable for any such damages or claims irrespective of the provisions of any lease.

 

From time to time, in connection with managing the properties or upon acquisition of a property, the Company authorizeswe authorize the preparation of Phase I and, when necessary, Phase II environmental reports with respect to itsour properties. Based upon such environmental reports and the Company’sour ongoing review of itsour properties, as of the date of this Annual Report, the Company iswe are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of itsour properties which it believeswe believe would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on itsour financial condition and/or results of operations. There can be no assurance, however, that (1) the discovery of environmental conditions, the existence or severity of which were previously unknown; (2) changes in law; (3) the conduct of tenants; or (4) activities relating to properties in the vicinity of our properties, will not expose the Companyus to material liability in the future.

 

Contact Information

 

Additional information about the Companyus can be found on the Company’sour website which is located at www.mreic.reit.www.mreic.reit. Information contained on or hyperlinked from our Web siteWebsite is not incorporated by reference into and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Company makesWe make available, free of charge, on or through itsour website, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.You can also read and copy any materials the Company files with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internetinternet site (http:(http://www.sec.gov)www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

 

Segment Reporting & Financial Information

The Company’s primary business is the ownership and management of real estate properties. The Company invests in well-located, modern, single tenant, industrial buildings leased primarily to investment grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. The Company reviews operating and financial information for each property on an individual basis and, therefore, each property represents an individual operating segment. The Company evaluates financial performance using Net Operating Income (“NOI”) from property operations. NOI is defined as recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses, such as insurance, utilities and repairs and maintenance. The Company has aggregated the properties into one reportable segment as the properties share similar long-term economic characteristics and have other similarities, including the fact that they are operated as industrial properties subject to long-term net leases primarily to investment grade tenants or their subsidiaries.For required financial information related to our operations and assets, please refer to our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report.

 7 
Table of Contents

 

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

 

The following risk factors address the material risks concerning our business. If any of the risks discussed in this report were to occur, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operation and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our shareholders could be materially and adversely affected and the market price per share of our stock could decline significantly. Some statements in this report, including statements in the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

Real Estate Industry Risks

 

Our business and financial results are affected by local real estate conditions in areas where we own properties.We may be affected adversely by general economic conditions and local real estate conditions. For example, an oversupply of industrial properties in a local area or a decline in the attractiveness of our properties to tenants and potential tenants could have a negative effect on us.

 

Other factors that may affect general economic conditions or local real estate conditions include but are not limited to:

 

 population and demographic trends;
   
 employment and personal income trends;
   
 zoning, use and other regulatory restrictions;
   
 income tax laws;
   
 changes in interest rates and availability and costs of financing; and
   
 competition from other available real estate.

 

We may be unable to compete with our larger competitors and other alternatives available to tenants or potential tenants of our properties. The real estate business is highly competitive. We compete for properties with other real estate investors and purchasers, including other real estate investment trusts, limited partnerships, syndications and private investors, some of whom may have greater financial resources, revenues and geographical diversity than we have. Furthermore, we compete for tenants with other property owners. All of our industrial properties are subject to significant local competition. We also compete with a wide variety of institutions and other investors for capital funds necessary to support our investment activities and asset growth. To the extent that we are unable to effectively compete in the marketplace, our business may be adversely affected.

We are subject to significant regulation that inhibits our activities and may increase our costs. Local zoning and use laws, environmental statutes and other governmental requirements may restrict expansion, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities. These regulations may prevent us from taking advantage of economic opportunities. Legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act may require us to modify our properties at a substantial cost and noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. Future legislation may impose additional requirements. We may incur additional costs to comply with any future requirements.

Our investments are concentrated in the industrial distribution sector and our business would be adversely affected by an economic downturn in that sector. Our investments in real estate assets are primarily concentrated in the industrial distribution sector. This concentration may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in this sector to a greater extent than if our business activities included a more significant portion of other sectors of the real estate industry.

 

 8 
Table of Contents

 

Risks Associated with Our Properties

We may be unable to renew or extend leases or re-let space as leases expire. While we seek to invest in well-located, modern, single tenant, industrial buildings, leased to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases, a number of our properties are subject to short-term leases. When a lease expires, a tenant may elect not to renew or extend it. We may not be able to re-let the property on similar terms, if we are able to re-let the property at all. The terms of renewal, extension or re-lease (including the cost of required renovations and/or concessions to tenants) may be less favorable to us than the prior lease. If we are unable to re-let all or a substantial portion of our properties, or if the rental rates upon such re-letting are significantly lower than expected rates, our cash generated before debt repayments and capital expenditures and our ability to make expected distributions, may be adversely affected. We have established an annual budget for renovation and re-letting expenses that we believe is reasonable in light of each property’s operating history and local market characteristics. However, this budget may not be sufficient to cover these expenses.

 

Our business is substantially dependent on FedEx Corporation. FDX, together with its subsidiaries, is our largest tenant, consisting of fifty-three60 separate stand-alone leases located in twenty-four24 different states as of September 30, 2016.2018. As of September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we had approximately 16,010,00021,174,000 square feet of property, of which approximately 7,584,00010,083,000 square feet, or 47%48%, were leased to FDX and its subsidiaries (6%(7% from FDX and 41% from FDX subsidiaries). Rental and reimbursement revenue from FDX and its subsidiaries is approximately 56%58% (7% from FDX and 49%51% from FDX subsidiaries) of total rental and reimbursement revenue for fiscal 2016.2018. No other tenant accounted for 5% or more of the Company’sour total Rental and Reimbursement revenue for fiscal 2016.2018. As a result of this concentration, our business, financial condition and results of operations, including the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders, could be adversely affected if we are unable to do business with FDX or FDX reduces its business with us or FDX and its subsidiaries were to become unable to make lease payments because of a downturn in its business or otherwise.

 

FDX is a publicly-owned company and financial information related to this entity is available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. FDX is rated “BBB” by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and is rated “Baa2” by Moody’s (www.moodys.com), which are both considered “Investment Grade” ratings. The references in this report to the SEC’s website, S&P Global Ratings’ website and Moody’s website are not intended to and do not include or incorporate by reference into this report the information of FDX, S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on such websites.

We are subject to risks involved in single tenant leasesleases..We focus our acquisition activities on real properties that are net-leased to single tenants. Therefore, the financial failure of, or other default by, a single tenant under its lease is likely to cause a significant reduction in the operating cash flow generated by the property leased to that tenant and might decrease the value of that property. In addition, we will be responsible for 100% of the operating costs following a vacancy at a single tenant building.

 

We may be affected negatively by tenant financial difficulties and leasing delays. At any time, a tenant may experience a downturn in its business that may weaken its financial condition. Similarly, a general decline in the economy may result in a decline in the demand for space at our industrial properties. As a result, our tenants may delay lease commencement, fail to make rental payments when due, or declare bankruptcy. Any such event could result in the termination of that tenant’s lease and losses to us.

 

We receive a substantial portion of our income as rents under long-term leases. If tenants are unable to comply with the terms of their leases because of rising costs or falling revenues, we, in our sole discretion, may deem it advisable to modify lease terms to allow tenants to pay a lower rental rate or a smaller share of operating costs, taxes and insurance. If a tenant becomes insolvent or bankrupt, we cannot be sure that we could recover the premises from the tenant promptly or from a trustee or debtor-in-possession in any bankruptcy proceeding relating to the tenant. We also cannot be sure that we would receive rent in the proceeding sufficient to cover our expenses with respect to the premises. If a tenant becomes bankrupt, the federal bankruptcy code will apply and, in some instances, may restrict the amount and recoverability of our claims against the tenant. A tenant’s default on its obligations to us for any reason could adversely affect our financial condition and the cash we have available for distribution.

 

9
Table of Contents

We may be unable to sell properties when appropriate because real estate investments are illiquid.Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly and, therefore, will tend to limit our ability to vary our property portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the Code may limit our ability to sell our properties. The inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our property portfolio could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to service debt and make distributions to our shareholders.

9
Table of Contents

Environmental liabilities could affect our profitability. We face possible environmental liabilities. Environmental laws today can impose liability on a previous owner or operator of a property that owned or operated the property at a time when hazardous or toxic substances were disposed on, or released from, the property. A conveyance of the property, therefore, does not relieve the owner or operator from liability. As a current or former owner and operator of real estate, we may be required by law to investigate and clean up hazardous substances released at or from the properties we currently own or operate or have in the past owned or operated. We may also be liable to the government or to third parties for property damage, investigation costs and cleanup costs. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs the government incurs in connection with the contamination. Contamination may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. We are not aware of any environmental liabilities relating to our investment properties which would have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, or results of operations. However, we cannot assure you that environmental liabilities will not arise in the future and that such liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on our business, assets or results of operation.

 

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties. We compete with other owners and operators of real estate, some of which own properties similar to ours in the same submarkets in which our properties are located. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain tenants when our tenants’ leases expire. As a result, our financial condition, cash flow and cash available for distribution, the market price of our preferred and common stock and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially and adversely affected.

Coverage under our existing insurance policies may be inadequate to cover losses. Weather conditions and natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornados,tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, droughts, fires and other environmental conditions can harm our business operations. We generally maintain insurance policies related to our business, including casualty, general liability and other policies, covering our business operations, employees and assets. However, we would be required to bear all losses that are not adequately covered by insurance. In addition, there are certain losses that are not generally insured because it is not economically feasible to insure against them, including losses due to riots or acts of war. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits were to occur with respect to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the properties and, in the case of debt, which is with recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Although we believe that our insurance programs are adequate, we cannot assure you that we will not incur losses in excess of our insurance coverage, or that we will be able to obtain insurance in the future at acceptable levels and reasonable costs.

 

We may be unable to acquire properties on advantageous terms or acquisitions may not perform as we expect. We have acquired individual properties and intend to continue to do so. However, we may be unable to acquire any of the properties that we may identify as potential acquisition opportunities in the future. Our acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:

 

 when we are able to locate a desired property, competition from other real estate investors may significantly increase the purchase price;
   
 acquired properties may fail to perform as expected;
   
 the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired properties may be higher than our estimates;

10
Table of Contents   

 acquired properties may be located in new markets where we face risks associated with an incomplete knowledge or understanding of the local market, a limited number of established business relationships in the area and a relative unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures;
   
 we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and as a result, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected; and
   
 we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, to the seller. As a result, if a claim were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to resolve it, which could adversely affect our cash flow and financial condition.

10
Table of Contents

 

Financing Risks

 

We face inherent risks associated with our debt incurrence. We finance a portion of our investments in properties and marketable securities through the incurrence of debt. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. In addition, debt creates other risks, including:

 

 rising interest rates on our variable rate debt;
   
 inability to repay or refinance existing debt as it matures, which may result in forced disposition of assets on disadvantageous terms;
   
 one or more lenders under our $200 million unsecured line of credit could refuse to fund their financing commitment to us or could fail, and we may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all;
   
 refinancing terms that are less favorable than the terms of existing debt; and
   
 inability to meet required payments of principal and/or interest.

 

We mortgage our properties, which subjects us to the risk of foreclosure in the event of non-payment.We mortgage many of our properties to secure payment of indebtedness and, if we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the property could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a consequent loss of income and asset value. A foreclosure of one or more of our properties could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to service debt and make distributions and the market price of our preferred and common stock.

 

We face risks related to “balloon payments” and refinancings. Certain mortgages will have significant outstanding principal balances on their maturity dates, commonly known as “balloon payments.” There can be no assurance that we will have the funds available to fund the balloon payment or that we will be able to refinance the debt on favorable terms or at all. To the extent we cannot either pay off or refinance this debt on favorable terms or at all, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms or pay higher interest rates, either of which could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and ability to service debt and make distributions.

We face risks associated with our dependence on external sources of capital. In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required each year to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, and we are subject to tax on our income to the extent it is not distributed. Because of this distribution requirement, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs from cash retained from operations. As a result, to fund capital needs, we rely on third-party sources of capital, which we may not be able to obtain on favorable terms, if at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends upon a number of factors, including (i) general market conditions; (ii) the market’s perception of our growth potential; (iii) our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions; and (iv) the market price of our capital stock. Additional debt financing may substantially increase our debt-to-total capitalization ratio. Additional equity issuances may dilute the holdings of our current shareholders.

11
Table of Contents

We may become more highly leveraged, resulting in increased risk of default on our obligations and an increase in debt service requirements which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions.We have incurred, and may continue to incur, indebtedness in furtherance of our activities.activities. Our governing documents do not limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, our Board of Directors may authorize us to incur additional debt and would do so, for example, if it were necessary to maintain our status as a REIT. We could therefore become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increased risk of default on our obligations and an increase in debt service requirements which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to shareholders.

 

11
Table of Contents

Fluctuations in interest rates could materially affect our financial results.Because a portion of our debt bears interest at variable rates, increases in interest rates could materially increase our interest expense. If the United States Federal Reserve increases short-term interest rates, this may have a significant upward impact on shorter-term interest rates, including the interest rates that our variable rate debt is based upon. Potential future increases in interest rates and credit spreads may increase our interest expense and affect our ability to obtain fixed rate debt at favorable interest rates and therefore negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations, and reduce our access to the debt or equity capital markets.

Covenants in our loan documents could limit our flexibility and adversely affect our financial condition. The terms of our various credit agreements and other indebtedness require us to comply with a number of customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage. These covenants may limit our flexibility in our operations, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness even if we had satisfied our payment obligations. If we were to default under credit agreements or other debt instruments, our financial condition could be adversely affected.

 

Risks Related to our Status as a REIT

If our leases are not respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes, we would fail to qualify as a REIT.To qualify as a REIT, we must, among other things, satisfy two gross income tests, under which specified percentages of our gross income must be passive income, such as rent. For the rent paid pursuant to our leases to qualify for purposes of the gross income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. The determination of whether a lease is a true lease depends upon an analysis of all the surrounding facts and circumstances. We believe that our leases will be respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes. However, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will agree with this view. If the leases are not respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes, we would not be able to satisfy either of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs, and we could lose our REIT status.

 

Failure to make required distributions would subject us to additional tax.In order to qualify as a REIT, we must, among other requirements, distribute, each year, to our shareholders at least 90 percent of our taxable income, excluding net capital gains. To the extent that we satisfy the 90 percent distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100 percent of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income. In addition, we will incur a 4 percent nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our distributions (or deemed distributions) and the amounts of income retained on which we have paid corporate income tax in any year are less than the sum of:

 85 percent of our ordinary income for that year;
   
 95 percent of our capital gain net earnings for that year; and
   
 100 percent of our undistributed taxable income from prior years.

 

To the extent we pay out in excess of 100 percent of our taxable income for any tax year, we may be able to carry forward such excess to subsequent years to reduce our required distributions for purposes of the 4 percent excise tax in such subsequent years. We intend to pay out our income to our shareholders in a manner intended to satisfy the 90 percent distribution requirement. Differences in timing between the recognition of income and the related cash receipts, the effects of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or the effect of required debt amortization payments could require us to borrow money or sell assets (potentially during unfavorable market conditions) to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the 90 percent distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax.

 

12
Table of Contents

We may not have sufficient cash available from operations to pay distributions, and, therefore, distributions may be made from borrowings.The actual amount and timing of distributions will be determined by our Board of Directors in its discretion and typically will depend on the amount of cash available for distribution, which will depend on items such as current and projected cash requirements, limitations on distributions imposed by law or our financing arrangements and tax considerations. As a result, we may not have sufficient cash available from operations to pay distributions as required to maintain our status as a REIT. Therefore, we may need to borrow funds to make sufficient cash distributions in order to maintain our status as a REIT, which may cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of an increase in borrowed funds for the purpose of paying distributions.

 

12
Table of Contents

We may be required to pay a penalty tax upon the sale of a property.The federal income tax provisions applicable to REITs provide that any gain realized by a REIT on the sale of property, other than foreclosure property, held as inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a “prohibited transaction” that is subject to a 100 percent penalty tax. Under current law, unless a sale of real property qualifies for a safe harbor, the question of whether the sale of real estate or other property constitutes the sale of property held primarily for sale to customers is generally a question of the facts and circumstances regarding a particular transaction. It is our intent that we and our subsidiaries will hold the interests in the real estate for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, engage in the business of acquiring and owning real estate, and make occasional sales as are consistent with our investment objectives. We do not intend to engage in prohibited transactions. We cannot assure you, however, that we will only make sales that satisfy the requirements of the safe harbors or that the IRS will not successfully assert that one or more of such sales are prohibited transactions.

We may be adversely affected if we fail to qualify as a REIT.If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we The 100% tax will not be allowedapply to deduct distributions to shareholders in computing ourgains from the sale of property that is held through a taxable REIT subsidiary or other taxable corporation, although such income and will be subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular U.S. federal income tax including anyrates.

There is a risk of changes in the tax law applicable alternative minimum tax, at regular corporate rates. In addition, we might be barred from qualification as a REIT forto real estate investment trusts. Because the four years following disqualification. The additional tax incurred at regular corporate rates would reduce significantlyIRS, the cash flow available for distribution to shareholdersUnited States Treasury Department and for debt service. Furthermore, we would no longer be required to make any distributions to our shareholders as a condition to REIT qualification. Any distributions to shareholders would be taxable as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, although such dividend distributions would be subject to a topCongress frequently review federal income tax ratelegislation, we cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted. Any of 20% (and potentially a Medicaresuch legislative actions may prospectively or retroactively modify our tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of 3.8%). Corporate distributees, however, may be eligible for the dividends received deduction on the distributions, subject to limitations under the Code.us and/or our investors.

The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the TCJA, has significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their shareholders. Changes made by the TCJA that could affect us and our shareholders include:

temporarily reducing individual U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income; the highest individual U.S. federal income tax rate has been reduced from 39.6% to 37% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
permanently eliminating the progressive corporate tax rate structure, with a maximum corporate tax rate of 35%, and replacing it with a flat corporate tax rate of 21%;
permitting a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received by our shareholders from us that are not designated by us as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, which will generally allow individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct up to 20% of such amounts for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
reducing the highest rate of withholding with respect to our distributions to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests from 35% to 21%;
limiting our deduction for net operating losses to 80% of REIT taxable income (prior to the application of the dividends paid deduction);
generally limiting the deduction for net business interest expense in excess of 30% of a business’s adjusted taxable income except for taxpayers that engage in certain real estate businesses and elect out of this rule (provided that such electing taxpayers must use an alternative depreciation system for certain property); and
eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax.

13
Table of Contents

You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory, judicial or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our securities.

To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with certain highly technical and complex requirements. We cannot be certain we have complied, and will always be able to comply, with the requirements to qualify as a REIT because there are few judicial and administrative interpretations of these provisions. In addition, facts and circumstances that may be beyond our control may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. We cannot assure you that new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not change the tax laws significantly with respect to our qualification as a REIT or with respect to the federal income tax consequences of qualification. We believe that we have qualified as a REIT since our inception and intend to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, we cannot assure you that we are qualified or will remain qualified.

There is a risk of changes in the tax law applicable to real estate investment trusts. Because the IRS, the United States Treasury Department and Congress frequently review federal income tax legislation, we cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted. Any of such legislative action may prospectively or retroactively modify our tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of us and/or our investors.

 

We may be unable to comply with the strict income distribution requirement applicable to REITs. As noted above, to maintain qualification as a REIT under the Code, a REIT must annually distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, excluding the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains. This requirement limits our ability to accumulate capital. We may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the 90% distribution requirements. Difficulties in meeting the 90% distribution requirement might arise due to competing demands for our funds or to timing differences between tax reporting and cash receipts and disbursements, because income may have to be reported before cash is received, because expenses may have to be paid before a deduction is allowed, because deductions may be disallowed or limited or because the IRS may make a determination that adjusts reported income. In those situations, we might be required to borrow funds or sell properties on adverse terms in order to meet the 90% distribution requirement and interest and penalties could apply which could adversely affect our financial condition. If we fail to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, we would cease to be taxed as a REIT.

 

13
Table of Contents

Notwithstanding our status as a REIT, we are subject to various federal, state and local taxes on our income and property. For example, we will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains; provided, however, that properly designated undistributed capital gains will effectively avoid taxation at the shareholder level. We may be subject to other federal income taxes and may also have to pay some state income or franchise taxes because not all states treat REITs in the same manner as they are treated for federal income tax purposes. In addition, any taxable REIT subsidiary that we may form will be subject to regular corporate federal, state and local taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distributions to stockholders.

 

Other Risks

We may not be able to access adequate cash to fund our business.Our business requires access to adequate cash to finance our operations, distributions, capital expenditures, debt service obligations, development and redevelopment costs and property acquisition costs, if any. We expect to generate the cash to be used for these purposes primarily with operating cash flow, borrowings under secured and unsecured term loans, proceeds from sales of strategically identified assets and, when market conditions permit, through the issuance of debt and equity securities from time to time. We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to fund our business, particularly if we are unable to renew or extend leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire according to expectations.

We are dependent on key personnel.Our executive and other senior officers have a significant role in our success. Our ability to retain our management group or to attract suitable replacements should any members of the management group leave is dependent on the competitive nature of the employment market. The loss of services from key members of the management group or a limitation in their availability could adversely affect our financial condition and cash flow. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the capital markets.

We may amend our business policies without shareholder approval.Our Board of Directors determines our growth, investment, financing, capitalization, borrowing, operations and distributions policies. In addition, our charter provides that our Board of Directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. Although our Board of Directors has no present intention to amend or reverse any of these policies, they may be amended or revised without notice to shareholders. Accordingly, shareholders may not have control over changes in our policies. We cannot assure you that changes in our policies will serve fully the interests of all shareholders.

14
Table of Contents

The market value of our preferred and common stock could decrease based on our performance and market perception and conditions.The market value of our preferred and common stock may be based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and current and future cash dividends, and may be secondarily based upon the real estate market value of our underlying assets. The market price of our preferred and common stock is influenced by their respective distributions relative to market interest rates. Rising interest rates may lead potential buyers of our stock to expect a higher distribution rate, which could adversely affect the market price of our stock. In addition, rising interest rates could result in increased expense, thereby adversely affecting cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and pay distributions.

There are restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our capital stock.To maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned, actually or by attribution, by five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code to also include certain entities, during the last half of a taxable year. Accordingly, our charter contains provisions restricting the ownership and transfer of our capital stock. These restrictions may discourage a tender offer or other transaction, or a change in management or of control of us that might involve a premium price for our common stock or preferred stock or that our shareholders otherwise believe to be in their best interests, and may result in the transfer of shares acquired in excess of the restrictions to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and, as a result, the forfeiture by the acquirer of the benefits of owning the additional shares.

14
Table of Contents

 

Our earnings are dependent, in part, upon the performance of our investment portfolio.As permitted by the Code, we invest in and own marketable securities of other REITs, which we generally limit to no more than approximately 10% of our undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). To the extent that the fair value of those investments declines or those investments do not provide an attractive return, our earnings and cash flow could be adversely affected. Beginning with our fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, all changes in the fair value of the equity securities of other REITs that we own, whether realized or unrealized, will be recognized as gains or losses in our consolidated statement of income. As a result, fluctuations in the fair value of those investments will, in the future, impact our earnings even if we have not sold the underlying investments.

We are subject to restrictions that may impede our ability to effect a change in control. Certain provisions contained in our charter and bylaws and certain provisions of Maryland law may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us and thereby inhibit a change in control. These provisions include the following:

 

 

Our charter provides for three classes of directors with the term of office of one class expiring each year, commonly referred to as a “staggered board.” By preventing common shareholders from voting on the election of more than one class of directors at any annual meeting of shareholders, this provision may have the effect of keeping the current members of our Board of Directors in control for a longer period of time than shareholders may desire.

   
 Our charter generally limits any stockholder from acquiring more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding equity stock (defined as all of our classes of capital stock, except our excess stock). While this provision is intended to assist us in qualifying as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the ownership limit may also limit the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their shares of common stock that might otherwise exist if an investor was attempting to assemble a block of shares in excess of 9.8% of the outstanding shares of equity stock or otherwise effect a change in control.
   
 The request of shareholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at such meeting is necessary for shareholders to call a special meeting. We also require advance notice from shareholders for the nomination of directors or proposals of business to be considered at a meeting of shareholders.

15
Table of Contents   

 Our Board of Directors may authorize and cause us to issue securities without shareholder approval. Under our charter, our Board of Directors has the power to classify and reclassify any of our unissued shares of capital stock into shares of capital stock with such preferences, rights, powers and restrictions as the Board of Directors may determine.
   
 “Business combination” provisions that provide that, unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not engage in certain business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of 10 percent or more of its assets, certain issuances of shares of stock and other specified transactions, with an “interested shareholder” or an affiliate of an interested shareholder for five years after the most recent date on which the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder, and thereafter unless specified criteria are met. An interested shareholder is defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof or an affiliate or associate of ours who was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting stock at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question. In our charter, we have expressly elected that the Maryland Business Combination Act not govern or apply to any transaction with a related company, UMH Properties, Inc. (“UMH”)(UMH), a Maryland corporation.
   
 The duties of directors of a Maryland corporation do not require them to, among other things (a) accept, recommend or respond to any proposal by a person seeking to acquire control of the corporation, (b) authorize the corporation to redeem any rights under, or modify or render inapplicable, any shareholders rights plan, (c) make a determination under the Maryland Business Combination Act or the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act to exempt any person or transaction from the requirements of those provisions, or (d) act or fail to act solely because of the effect of the act or failure to act may have on an acquisition or potential acquisition of control of the corporation or the amount or type of consideration that may be offered or paid to the shareholders in an acquisition.

15
Table of Contents

 

We cannot assure you that we will be able to pay distributions regularly.Our ability to pay distributions in the future is dependent on our ability to operate profitably and to generate cash from our operations and the operations of our subsidiaries and is subject to limitations under our financing arrangements and Maryland law. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law, or the MGCL, a Maryland corporation generally may not make a distribution if, after giving effect to the distribution, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as the debts became due in the usual course of business, or the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus, unless the charter permits otherwise, the amount that would be needed if the corporation were to be dissolved at the time of the distribution to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferential rights on dissolution are superior to those receiving the distribution. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to pay distributions on a regular quarterly basis in the future.

 

Future terrorist attacks and military conflicts could have a material adverse effect on general economic conditions, consumer confidence and market liquidity.Among other things, it is possible that interest rates may be affected by these events. An increase in interest rates may increase our costs of borrowing, leading to a reduction in our earnings. Terrorist acts could also result in significant damages to, or loss of, our properties.

We and our tenants may be unable to obtain adequate insurance coverage on acceptable economic terms for losses resulting from acts of terrorism. Our lenders may require that we carry terrorism insurance even if we do not believe this insurance is necessary or cost effective. We may also be prohibited under the applicable lease from passing all or a portion of the cost of such insurance through to the tenant. Should an act of terrorism result in an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose capital invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from a property, while remaining obligated for any mortgage indebtedness or other financial obligations related to the property. Any loss of these types could adversely affect our financial condition.

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on us and the market price of our capital stock.Over the last several years, the United States stock and credit markets have experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which have caused market prices of many stocks and debt securities to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective debt financing to widen considerably. More recently, the financial crisis in Europe (including financial difficulties at several large European banks) has had a similar, although less pronounced, effect. Adding to the European credit crisis, in June 2016, voters in the United Kingdom elected to withdraw from the European Union in a national referendum. The referendum has created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union and has continued to have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets and could significantly reduce global market liquidity and restrict the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets. Continued uncertainty in the stock and credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access additional financing at reasonable terms, which may negatively affect our ability to acquire properties and otherwise pursue our investment strategy. A prolonged downturn in the stock or credit markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our investment strategy accordingly. These types of events in the stock and credit markets may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of the common stock, preferred stock or debt securities. The potential disruptions in the financial markets may have a material adverse effect on the market value of the common stock and preferred stock and the return we receive on our properties and investments, as well as other unknown adverse effects on us or the economy in general.

We are subject to risks arising from litigation.litigation.We may become involved in litigation. Litigation can be costly, and the results of litigation are often difficult to predict. We may not have adequate insurance coverage or contractual protection to cover costs and liability in the event we are sued, and to the extent we resort to litigation to enforce our rights, we may incur significant costs and ultimately be unsuccessful or unable to recover amounts we believe are owed to us. We may have little or no control of the timing of litigation, which presents challenges to our strategic planning.

 

Dividends on our capital stock do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.Income from “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates are generally subject to tax at preferential rates. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Although these rules do not adversely affect our taxation or the dividends payable by us, to the extent that the preferential rates continue to apply to regular corporate qualified dividends, investors who are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive an investment in us to be relatively less attractive than an investment in the stock of a non-REIT corporation that pays dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of, and per share trading price of, our capital stock.

 

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

 16 
Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES

 

The Company operatesWe operate as a REIT. Our portfolio is primarily comprised of real estate holdings, some of which have been long-term holdings carried on our financial statements at depreciated cost. We believe that their current market values exceed both the original cost and the depreciated cost.

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Company’sour real estate investments as of September 30, 2016:2018:

 

        Mortgage     Mortgage 
  Fiscal Year     Square Balance   Fiscal Year  Square Balance 
State  City (MSA) Acquisition  Type  Footage  9/30/2016  City (MSA) Acquisition Type Footage  9/30/2018 
         
AL Huntsville 2005 Industrial  88,653  $370,903 
AL  Huntsville  2005   Industrial   88,653  $795,594  Mobile 2018 Industrial  362,942   18,832,395 
AZ  Tolleson (Phoenix)  2003   Industrial   283,358   5,299,383  Tolleson (Phoenix) 2003 Industrial  283,358   3,719,709 
CO  Colorado Springs  2006   Industrial   68,370   1,329,709 
CO  Colorado Springs  2016   Industrial   225,362   18,576,282  Colorado Springs 2016 Industrial  225,362   16,651,710 
CO  Denver  2005   Industrial   69,865   1,059,646  Denver 2005 Industrial  69,865   414,049 
CT  Newington (Hartford)  2001   Industrial   54,812   -0-  Newington (Hartford) 2001 Industrial  54,812   -0- 
FL  Cocoa  2008   Industrial   144,138   5,063,864  Cocoa 2008 Industrial  144,138   -0- 
FL  Davenport (Orlando)  2016   Industrial   310,922   26,400,000  Davenport (Orlando) 2016 Industrial  310,922   23,702,918 
FL  Ft. Myers  2003   Industrial   87,500   -0-  Daytona Beach 2018 Industrial  399,440   19,187,819 
FL  Jacksonville (FDX)  1999   Industrial   95,883   1,384,194  Ft. Myers 2017 Industrial  213,672   13,280,803 
FL  Jacksonville (FDX Ground)  2015   Industrial   297,579   18,453,112  Homestead (Miami) 2017 Industrial  237,756   23,313,676 
FL  Lakeland  2006   Industrial   32,105   -0-  Jacksonville (FDX) 1999 Industrial  95,883   -0- 
FL  Orlando  2008   Industrial   110,638   4,342,604  Jacksonville (FDX Ground) 2015 Industrial  297,579   16,243,754 
FL  Punta Gorda  2007   Industrial   34,624   1,990,764  Lakeland 2006 Industrial  32,105   -0- 
FL  Tampa (FDX Ground)  2004   Industrial   170,779   6,633,049  Orlando 2008 Industrial  110,638   -0- 
FL  Tampa (FDX)  2006   Industrial   95,662   3,900,447  Punta Gorda 2007 Industrial  34,624   -0- 
FL  Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  2005   Industrial   68,385   -0-  Tampa (FDX Ground) 2004 Industrial  170,779   5,144,319 
FL Tampa (FDX) 2006 Industrial  95,662   -0- 
FL Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) 2005 Industrial  68,385   -0- 
GA Augusta (FDX Ground) 2005 Industrial  59,358   338,789 
GA Augusta (FDX) 2006 Industrial  30,184   -0- 
GA  Augusta (FDX Ground)  2005   Industrial   59,358   774,093  Braselton (Atlanta) 2018 Industrial  373,750   39,700,000 
GA  Augusta (FDX)  2006   Industrial   30,184   -0-  Griffin (Atlanta) 2006 Industrial  218,120   -0- 
GA  Griffin (Atlanta)  2006   Industrial   218,120   -0-  Savannah 2018 Industrial  831,764   32,215,696 
IA  Urbandale (Des Moines)  1994   Industrial   36,270   -0-  Urbandale (Des Moines) 1994 Industrial  36,270   -0- 
IL  Burr Ridge (Chicago)  1997   Industrial   12,500   -0-  Burr Ridge (Chicago) 1997 Industrial  12,500   -0- 
IL  Elgin (Chicago)  2002   Industrial   89,052   349,658  Elgin (Chicago) 2002 Industrial  89,052   -0- 
IL  Granite City (St. Louis, MO)  2001   Industrial   184,800   -0-  Granite City (St. Louis, MO) 2001 Industrial  184,800   -0- 
IL  Montgomery (Chicago)  2004   Industrial   171,200   -0-  Montgomery (Chicago) 2004 Industrial  171,200   -0- 
IL  Rockford (B/E Aerospace, Inc.)  2015   Industrial   38,833   -0-  Rockford (Collins Aerospace Systems) 2015 Industrial  38,833   -0- 
IL  Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Company)  2011   Industrial   66,387   -0-  Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Co.) 2011 Industrial  66,387   -0- 
IL  Sauget (St. Louis, MO)  2015   Industrial   198,773   9,701,419  Sauget (St. Louis, MO) 2015 Industrial  198,773   8,563,797 
IL  Schaumburg (Chicago)  1997   Industrial   73,500   -0-  Schaumburg (Chicago) 1997 Industrial  73,500   -0- 
IL  Wheeling (Chicago)  2003   Industrial   123,000   -0-  Wheeling (Chicago) 2003 Industrial  123,000   -0- 
IN  Greenwood (Indianapolis)  2015   Industrial   671,354   22,760,488  Greenwood (Indianapolis) 2015 Industrial  671,354   20,159,025 
IN  Indianapolis  2014   Industrial   327,822   12,289,676  Indianapolis 2014 Industrial  327,822   10,437,151 
KS  Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlisle Tire)  2003   Industrial   179,280   397,513  Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlisle Tire) 2003 Industrial  179,280   -0- 
KS  Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper)  2014   Industrial   280,000   10,648,115  Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) 2014 Industrial  280,000   9,189,343 
KS  Olathe (Kansas City)  2016   Industrial   313,763   22,215,000  Olathe (Kansas City) 2016 Industrial  313,763   19,956,867 
KS  Topeka  2009   Industrial   40,000   1,363,023  Topeka 2009 Industrial  40,000   860,364 
KY  Buckner (Louisville)  2014   Industrial   558,600   16,694,846  Buckner (Louisville) 2014 Industrial  558,600   15,305,669 
KY  Frankfort (Lexington)  2015   Industrial   599,840   18,352,289  Frankfort (Lexington) 2015 Industrial  599,840   16,639,132 
KY  Louisville  2016   Industrial   137,500   7,288,891  Louisville 2016 Industrial  137,500   6,525,135 
LA  Covington (New Orleans)  2016   Industrial   175,315   12,468,713  Covington (New Orleans) 2016 Industrial  175,315   11,133,990 
MD  Beltsville (Washington, DC)  2001   Industrial   144,523   -0-  Beltsville (Washington, DC) 2001 Industrial  148,881   -0- 
MI  Livonia (Detroit)  2013   Industrial   172,005   7,503,400  Livonia (Detroit) 2013 Industrial  172,005   6,294,503 
MI  Orion  2007   Industrial   245,633   8,580,058  Orion 2007 Industrial  245,633   -0- 
MI  Romulus (Detroit)  1998   Industrial   71,933   -0-  Romulus (Detroit) 1998 Industrial  71,933   -0- 
MN  Stewartville (Rochester) (1)  2013   Industrial   60,398   2,612,978 
MI Walker (Grand Rapids) 2017 Industrial  343,483   19,468,554 
MN  White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul) (4)  2001   Industrial   59,425   -0-  Stewartville (Rochester) (1) 2013 Industrial  60,398   2,115,962 
MO  Kansas City (Bunzl Distribution Midcentral, Inc.)  2015   Industrial   158,417   6,958,091  Kansas City 2015 Industrial  158,417   6,633,001 
MO Liberty (Kansas City) 1998 Industrial  95,898   -0- 
MO O’Fallon (St. Louis) 1994 Industrial  102,135   -0- 

 

 17 
Table of Contents

 

    Fiscal Year   Square Mortgage
Balance
 
State  City (MSA) Acquisition  TypeFootage 9/30/2016 
             
MO  Kansas City (Kellogg Sales Company)  2007  Industrial 65,067 $2,241,680 
MO  Liberty (Kansas City)  1998  Industrial 95,898  -0- 
MO  O’Fallon (St. Louis)  1994  Industrial 102,135  -0- 
MO  St. Joseph  2001  Industrial 382,880  -0- 
MS  Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Anda)  2012  Industrial 234,660  8,750,368 
MS  Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool)  2013  Industrial 861,889  25,000,000 
MS  Richland (Jackson)  1994  Industrial 36,000  -0- 
MS  Ridgeland (Jackson)  1993  Industrial 26,340  -0- 
NC  Concord (Charlotte)  2016  Industrial 330,717  20,001,944 
NC  Fayetteville  1997  Industrial 148,000  -0- 
NC  Winston-Salem  2002  Industrial 106,507  -0- 
NE  Omaha  1999  Industrial 89,115  -0- 
NJ  Carlstadt (New York, NY) (2)  2001  Industrial 60,400  1,898,198 
NJ  Somerset (3)  1970  Shopping Center 64,138  -0- 
NY  Cheektowaga (Buffalo)  2000  Industrial 104,981  343,548 
NY  Halfmoon (Albany)  2012  Industrial 75,000  3,786,098 
NY  Orangeburg (New York)  1993  Industrial 50,400  -0- 
OH  Bedford Heights (Cleveland)  2007  Industrial 82,269  2,685,791 
OH  Cincinnati  2015  Industrial 63,840  -0- 
OH  Lebanon (Cincinnati)  2012  Industrial 51,130  2,592,182 
OH  Monroe (Cincinnati)  2015  Industrial 232,200  8,071,987 
OH  Richfield (Cleveland)  2006  Industrial 131,152  3,078,731 
OH  Streetsboro (Cleveland)  2012  Industrial 368,060  10,446,469 
OH  West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati)  1999  Industrial 103,818  2,071,107 
OK  Oklahoma City  2012  Industrial 158,340  4,401,832 
OK  Tulsa  2014  Industrial 46,240  1,934,175 
PA  Altoona (1)  2014  Industrial 122,522  4,017,147 
PA  Imperial (Pittsburgh)  2016  Industrial 125,860  12,700,739 
PA  Monaca (Pittsburgh)  1988  Industrial 255,658  -0- 
SC  Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC)  2010  Industrial 176,939  1,926,986 
SC  Hanahan (Charleston) (SAIC)  2005  Industrial 302,400  5,605,514 
SC  Hanahan (Charleston) (FDX Ground)  2005  Industrial 91,776  1,064,185 
TN  Chattanooga  2007  Industrial 60,637  1,551,081 
TN  Lebanon (Nashville)  2011  Industrial 381,240  7,659,116 
TN  Memphis  2010  Industrial 449,900  6,667,886 
TN  Shelby County  2007  Land N/A  -0- 
TX  Carrollton (Dallas)  2010  Industrial 184,317  7,960,781 
TX  Corpus Christi  2012  Industrial 46,253  -0- 
TX  Edinburg  2011  Industrial 113,582  -0- 
TX  El Paso  2006  Industrial 144,149  3,259,726 
TX  Fort Worth (Dallas)  2015  Industrial 304,608  23,431,093 
TX  Houston  2010  Industrial 91,295  3,124,904 
TX  Lindale (Tyler)  2015  Industrial 163,378  6,378,382 
TX  Spring (Houston)  2014  Industrial 181,176  9,126,834 
TX  Waco  2012  Industrial 150,710  4,799,919 
VA  Charlottesville  1999  Industrial 48,064  -0- 
VA  Mechanicsville (Richmond) (FDX)  2001  Industrial 112,799  -0- 
VA  Richmond (United Technologies)  2004  Industrial 60,000  -0- 
VA  Roanoke (CHEP)  2007  Industrial 83,000  2,519,243 
VA  Roanoke (FDX Ground)  2013  Industrial 103,402  5,321,390 
WA  Burlington (Seattle/Everett)  2016  Industrial 210,445  19,881,817 
WI  Cudahy (Milwaukee)  2001  Industrial 139,564  -0- 
WI  Green Bay (1)  2013  Industrial 99,102  3,260,401 
           16,010,372 $483,748,153 

   Fiscal Year   Square  Mortgage
Balance
 
State City (MSA) Acquisition Type Footage  9/30/2018 
MO St. Joseph 2001 Industrial  382,880  $-0- 
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) 2012 Industrial  234,660   7,564,186 
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool) 2013 Industrial  861,889   21,722,567 
MS Richland (Jackson) 1994 Industrial  36,000   -0- 
MS Ridgeland (Jackson) 1993 Industrial  26,340   -0- 
NC Concord (Charlotte) 2016 Industrial  330,717   17,813,451 
NC Concord (Charlotte) 2017 Industrial  354,482   24,863,355 
NC Fayetteville 1997 Industrial  148,000   -0- 
NC Winston-Salem 2002 Industrial  106,507   -0- 
NE Omaha 1999 Industrial  89,115   -0- 
NJ Carlstadt (New York, NY) (2) 2001 Industrial  60,400   1,580,181 
NJ Somerset (3) 1970 Shopping Center  64,220   -0- 
NY Cheektowaga (Buffalo) 2002 Industrial  104,981   -0- 
NY Halfmoon (Albany) 2012 Industrial  75,000   -0- 
NY Hamburg (Buffalo) 2017 Industrial  338,584   21,328,714 
OH Bedford Heights (Cleveland) 2007 Industrial  82,269   -0- 
OH Cincinnati 2015 Industrial  63,840   -0- 
OH Kenton 2017 Industrial  298,472   11,473,387 
OH Lebanon (Cincinnati) 2012 Industrial  51,130   -0- 
OH Monroe (Cincinnati) 2015 Industrial  232,200   7,126,384 
OH Richfield (Cleveland) 2006 Industrial  131,152   -0- 
OH Stow 2017 Industrial  219,765   12,130,343 
OH Streetsboro (Cleveland) 2012 Industrial  368,060   9,300,481 
OH West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) 2000 Industrial  103,818   -0- 
OK Oklahoma City (Amazon) 2018 Industrial  300,000   19,013,593 
OK Oklahoma City (Bunzl) 2017 Industrial  110,361   5,537,962 
OK Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) 2012 Industrial  158,340   3,416,097 
OK Tulsa 2014 Industrial  46,240   1,685,288 
PA Altoona (1) 2014 Industrial  122,522   3,253,281 
PA Imperial (Pittsburgh) 2016 Industrial  125,860   11,199,661 
PA Monaca (Pittsburgh) 1977 Industrial  255,658   -0- 
SC Aiken (Augusta, GA) 2017 Industrial  315,560   14,471,117 
SC Charleston (FDX) 2018 Industrial  121,683   13,683,131 
SC Charleston (FDX Ground) 2018 Industrial  265,318   29,860,000 
SC Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) 2010 Industrial  176,939   724,766 
SC Hanahan (Charleston) (SAIC) 2005 Industrial  302,400   -0- 
SC Hanahan (Charleston) (FDX Ground) 2005 Industrial  91,776   465,749 
TN Chattanooga 2007 Industrial  60,637   -0- 
TN Lebanon (Nashville) 2011 Industrial  381,240   7,217,469 
TN Memphis 2010 Industrial  449,900   5,061,376 
TN Shelby County 2007 Land  N/A   -0- 
TX Carrollton (Dallas) 2010 Industrial  184,317   6,455,552 
TX Corpus Christi 2012 Industrial  46,253   -0- 
TX Edinburg 2011 Industrial  164,207   -0- 
TX El Paso 2006 Industrial  144,149   -0- 
TX Ft. Worth (Dallas) 2015 Industrial  304,608   20,753,864 
TX Houston 2010 Industrial  91,295   2,148,201 
TX Lindale (Tyler) 2015 Industrial  163,378   5,638,258 
TX Mesquite (Dallas) 2017 Industrial  351,874   30,928,224 
TX Spring (Houston) 2014 Industrial  181,176   7,924,865 
TX Waco 2012 Industrial  150,710   4,234,777 
VA Charlottesville 1999 Industrial  48,064   -0- 
VA Mechanicsville (Richmond) 2001 Industrial  112,799   -0- 
VA Richmond 2004 Industrial  60,000   -0- 
VA Roanoke (CHEP USA) 2007 Industrial  83,000   -0- 
VA Roanoke (FDX Ground) 2013 Industrial  103,402   4,395,246 
WA Burlington (Seattle/Everett) 2016 Industrial  210,445   17,757,364 
WI Cudahy (Milwaukee) 2001 Industrial  139,564   -0- 
WI Green Bay (1) 2013 Industrial  99,102   2,640,432 
         21,173,581  $719,768,355 

 

 (1)One loan is secured by the properties located in Green Bay, WI, Stewartville, MN and Altoona, PA.
 (2)The Company ownsWe own a 51% controlling equity interest.
 (3)The Company hasWe own a 67% controlling equity interest.
(4)The property was sold on October 27, 2016.

 

 18 

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the principal tenants and leases for the Company’sour properties shown above as of September 30, 2016:2018:

 

State  City (MSA) Tenant Annualized Rent  Lease Expiration   City (MSA) Tenant Annualized Rent  Lease Expiration  
      
AL Huntsville FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. $605,000  07/31/26  
AL  Huntsville FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. $590,000  07/31/26  (1) Mobile Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Amazon.com. Inc.)  2,020,000  11/30/28  
AZ  Tolleson (Phoenix) Western Container Corp. (Coca-Cola)  1,346,000  04/30/27  (2) Tolleson (Phoenix) Western Container Corp. (Coca-Cola)  1,361,000  04/30/27  
CO  Colorado Springs FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  644,000  09/30/18  
CO  Colorado Springs FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,832,000  01/31/26   Colorado Springs FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,832,000  01/31/26  
CO  Denver FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  564,000  07/31/18   Denver FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  605,000  10/31/25 (1)
CT  Newington (Hartford) Kellogg Sales Company  329,000  02/29/20  (2) Newington (Hartford) Kellogg Sales Company  329,000  02/29/20  
FL  Cocoa FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,112,000  09/30/24   Cocoa FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,112,000  09/30/24  
FL  Davenport (Orlando) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,604,000  04/30/31   Davenport (Orlando) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,609,000  04/30/31  
FL  Ft. Myers FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  433,000  06/30/17  (2) Daytona Beach B. Braun Medical Inc.  2,130,000  04/01/28  
FL  Jacksonville FedEx Corporation  518,000  05/31/19   Ft. Myers FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,418,000  08/31/27  
FL  Jacksonville FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,992,000  12/31/29   Homestead (Miami) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,282,000  03/31/32  
FL  Lakeland FedEx Corporation  155,000  11/30/17   Jacksonville FedEx Corporation  533,000  05/31/29 (1)
FL  Orlando FedEx Corporation  666,000  11/30/17   Jacksonville FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,998,000  12/31/29  
FL  Punta Gorda FedEx Corporation  304,000  06/30/17  (3) Lakeland FedEx Corporation  155,000  11/30/27 (1)
FL  Tampa FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,614,000  07/31/26  (4) Orlando FedEx Corporation  666,000  11/30/27 (1)
FL  Tampa FedEx Corporation  603,000  09/30/17  (3) Punta Gorda FedEx Corporation  284,000  06/30/27  
FL  Tampa Tampa Bay Grand Prix  289,000  09/30/20   Tampa FedEx Corporation  603,000  11/30/27  
FL Tampa FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,624,000  07/31/26  
FL Tampa Tampa Bay Grand Prix  297,000  09/30/20  
GA Augusta FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  501,000  06/30/21 (1)
GA Augusta FedEx Corporation  121,000  11/30/22  
GA  Augusta FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  453,000  06/30/18   Braselton (Atlanta) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  3,801,000  02/28/33  
GA  Augusta FedEx Corporation  121,000  11/30/22   Griffin (Atlanta) Rinnai America Corporation  831,000  12/31/20  
GA  Griffin (Atlanta) Caterpillar Logistics Services, Inc.  1,169,000  11/30/16  (3) Savannah Shaw Industries, Inc.  3,551,000  09/30/27  
IA  Urbandale (Des Moines) Keystone Automotive Industries MN, Inc.  140,000  03/31/17  (3) Urbandale (Des Moines) Foundation Building Materials, LLC  172,000  12/31/27 (2)
IL  Burr Ridge (Chicago) Sherwin-Williams Company  160,000  10/31/21   Burr Ridge (Chicago) Sherwin-Williams Company  162,000  10/31/21  
IL  Elgin (Chicago) Joseph T. Ryerson and Son, Inc.  506,000  01/31/20  (2) Elgin (Chicago) Joseph T. Ryerson and Son, Inc.  506,000  01/31/20  
IL  Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Anheuser-Busch, Inc.  806,000  11/30/21  (2) Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Anheuser-Busch, Inc.  821,000  11/30/21  
IL  Montgomery (Chicago) Home Depot USA, Inc.  978,000  06/30/20   Montgomery (Chicago) Home Depot USA, Inc.  997,000  06/30/20  
IL  Rockford B/E Aerospace, Inc.  360,000  06/30/27   Rockford Collins Aerospace Systems (United Technologies)  364,000  06/30/27 (3)
IL  Rockford Sherwin-Williams Company  477,000  12/31/23   Rockford Sherwin-Williams Company  481,000  12/31/23  
IL  Sauget (St. Louis, MO) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,036,000  05/31/29   Sauget (St. Louis, MO) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,036,000  05/31/29  
IL  Schaumburg (Chicago) FedEx Corporation  483,000  03/31/27  (2) Schaumburg (Chicago) FedEx Corporation  478,000  03/31/27  
IL  Wheeling (Chicago) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,386,000  05/31/17  (3) Wheeling (Chicago) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,272,000  05/31/27  
IN  Greenwood (Indianapolis) ULTA, Inc.  2,651,000  07/31/25   Greenwood (Indianapolis) ULTA, Inc.  2,702,000  07/31/25  
IN  Indianapolis FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,533,000  04/30/24   Indianapolis FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,715,000  10/31/27  
KS  Edwardsville (Kansas City) Carlisle Tire & Wheel Company  787,000  05/31/18   Edwardsville (Kansas City) Carlisle Tire & Wheel Company  739,000  07/31/23 (1)
KS  Edwardsville (Kansas City) International Paper Company  1,326,000  08/31/23   Edwardsville (Kansas City) International Paper Company  1,348,000  08/31/23  
KS  Olathe (Kansas City) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,196,000  05/31/31   Olathe (Kansas City) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,200,000  05/31/31  
KS  Topeka The Coca-Cola Company  332,000  09/30/21   Topeka Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Co., LLC (Coca-Cola)  332,000  09/30/21  
KY  Buckner (Louisville) TreeHouse Private Brands, Inc.  2,166,000  10/31/33   Buckner (Louisville) TreeHouse Private Brands, Inc.  2,206,000  10/31/33  
KY  Frankfort (Lexington) Jim Beam Brands Company  2,013,000  01/31/25   Frankfort (Lexington) Jim Beam Brands Company (Beam Suntory)  2,051,000  01/31/25  
KY  Louisville Challenger Lifts, Inc. (Snap-on Inc.)  835,000  06/07/26   Louisville Challenger Lifts, Inc. (Snap-on Inc.)  838,000  06/07/26  
LA  Covington (New Orleans) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,258,000  06/30/25   Covington (New Orleans) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,262,000  06/30/25  
MD  Beltsville (Washington, DC) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,426,000  07/31/18   Beltsville (Washington, DC) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,452,000  07/31/28 (1)
MI  Livonia (Detroit) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,194,000  03/31/22   Livonia (Detroit) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,194,000  03/31/22  
MI  Orion FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,908,000  06/30/23   Orion FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,908,000  06/30/23  
MI  Romulus (Detroit) FedEx Corporation  370,000  05/31/21   Romulus (Detroit) FedEx Corporation  370,000  05/31/21  
MN  Stewartville (Rochester) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  372,000  05/30/23  
MI Walker (Grand Rapids) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,102,000  01/31/32  
MN  White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul) Vacant  -0-  N/A  (6) Stewartville (Rochester) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  372,000  05/30/23  
MO  Kansas City Bunzl Distribution Midcentral, Inc.  741,000  09/30/21   Kansas City Bunzl Distribution Midcentral, Inc.  752,000  09/30/21  
MO  Kansas City Kellogg Sales Company  325,000  07/31/18   Liberty (Kansas City) Holland 1916 Inc.  349,000  06/30/19  
MO  Liberty (Kansas City) Holland 1916 Inc.  341,000  06/30/19   O’Fallon (St. Louis) Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC  442,000  06/30/21 (1)
MO  O’Fallon (St. Louis) Pittsburgh Glass Works LLC  427,000  06/30/18  (7) St. Joseph Woodstream Corporation  914,000  09/30/21 (4)
MO  St. Joseph Woodstream Corporation  896,000  09/30/17  (3)(5) St. Joseph Altec Industries, Inc.  371,000  02/28/23 (1)(4)
MO  St. Joseph Altec Industries, Inc.  349,000  02/28/18  (5)
MS  Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  1,196,000  07/31/22   Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  1,205,000  07/31/22  
MS  Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation  2,934,000  07/31/28  (8)
MS  Richland (Jackson) FedEx Corporation  120,000  03/31/24  
MS  Ridgeland (Jackson) Graybar Electric Company  109,000  07/31/19  (9)
NC  Concord (Charlotte) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,078,000  07/31/25  
NC  Fayetteville Victory Packaging L.P.  470,000  02/28/21  

 

 19 

State  City (MSA) Tenant Annualized Rent  Lease Expiration  
             
NC  Winston-Salem Style Crest, Inc. $361,000  03/31/21   
NE  Omaha FedEx Corporation  446,000  10/31/23   
NJ  Carlstadt (New York, NY) SOFIVE, Inc.  537,000  01/31/25  (10)
NJ  Somerset Various Tenants at Retail Shopping Center  780,000  Various  (11)
NY  Cheektowaga (Buffalo) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  966,000  08/31/19   
NY  Halfmoon (Albany) RGH Enterprises, Inc. (Cardinal Health)  596,000  11/30/21   
NY  Orangeburg (New York) Kellogg Sales Company  328,000  02/28/18   
OH  Bedford Heights (Cleveland) FedEx Corporation  408,000  08/31/18   
OH  Cincinnati The American Bottling Company (Dr Pepper Snapple)  477,000  09/30/29   
OH  Lebanon (Cincinnati) Siemens Real Estate  473,000  04/30/19   
OH  Monroe (Cincinnati) UGN, Inc.  1,050,000  02/28/30   
OH  Richfield (Cleveland) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,493,000  09/30/24   
OH  Streetsboro (Cleveland) Best Buy Warehousing Logistics, Inc.  1,641,000  01/31/22   
OH  West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  532,000  08/31/23   
OK  Oklahoma City FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,048,000  06/30/25   
OK  Tulsa The American Bottling Company (Dr Pepper Snapple)  257,000  02/28/24   
PA  Altoona FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  651,000  08/31/23   
PA  Imperial (Pittsburgh) General Electric Company  1,311,000  12/31/25   
PA  Monaca (Pittsburgh) NF&M International, Inc.  832,000  12/31/24  (5)
PA  Monaca (Pittsburgh) Datatel Resources Corporation  242,000  11/30/17  (2)(5)
SC  Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,415,000  10/31/23   
SC  Hanahan (Charleston) Science Applications International Corporation  1,462,000  04/30/19   
SC  Hanahan (Charleston) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  675,000  07/31/18   
TN  Chattanooga FedEx Corporation  311,000  10/31/17   
TN  Lebanon (Nashville) CBOCS Distribution, Inc. (Cracker Barrel)  1,420,000  06/30/24   
TN  Memphis FedEx Supply Chain Services, Inc.  1,327,000  05/31/19   
TN  Shelby County N/A- Land  -0-  N/A   
TX  Carrollton (Dallas) United Technologies Corporation  1,576,000  01/11/19   
TX  Corpus Christi FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  463,000  08/31/21   
TX  Edinburg FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  598,000  09/30/21  (12)
TX  El Paso FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,345,000  09/30/23   
TX  Fort Worth (Dallas) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,362,000  04/30/30   
TX  Houston National Oilwell Varco, Inc.  746,000  09/30/22   
TX  Lindale (Tyler) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  725,000  06/30/24   
TX  Spring (Houston) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,581,000  09/30/24   
TX  Waco FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,078,000  08/31/25   
VA  Charlottesville FedEx Corporation  329,000  08/31/17  (3)
VA  Mechanicsville (Richmond) FedEx Corporation  541,000  04/30/23   
VA  Richmond United Technologies Corporation  319,000  11/30/18  (2)
VA  Roanoke CHEP USA, Inc.  494,000  02/28/25  (13)
VA  Roanoke FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  755,000  04/30/23   
WA  Burlington (Seattle/Everett) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,962,000  08/31/30   
WI  Cudahy (Milwaukee) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  901,000  06/30/17  (3)
WI  Green Bay FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  468,000  05/30/23   
       $91,305,000      

(1)On August 1, 2016, a 14,941 square foot expansion of the building was completed for a cost of approximately $1,925,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from August 2022 through July 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $193,000 from approximately $412,000, or $5.59 per square foot, to approximately $605,000, or $6.82 per square foot.
   
(2)Extension has been executed. See fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017 renewal and extension chart.
(3)Renewal is in discussion for leases expiring in fiscal 2017.
(4)On August 1, 2016, a parking lot expansion for the property was completed for a cost of approximately $1,303,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration from June 2024 through July 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from date of completion of approximately $131,000 from approximately $1,493,000, or $8.74 per square foot to approximately $1,624,000, or $9.51 per square foot.
(5)Property is leased to two tenants.
(6)The property was sold on October 27, 2016.

State City (MSA) Tenant Annualized Rent  Lease Expiration  
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation $3,032,000  07/31/28  
MS Richland (Jackson) FedEx Corporation  120,000  03/31/24  
MS Ridgeland (Jackson) Graybar Electric Company  109,000  07/31/19 (5)
NC Concord (Charlotte) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,237,000  07/31/25  
NC Concord (Charlotte) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,537,000  05/31/32  
NC Fayetteville Victory Packaging, L.P.  502,000  02/28/21  
NC Winston-Salem Style Crest, Inc.  387,000  03/31/21  
NE Omaha FedEx Corporation  446,000  10/31/23  
NJ Carlstadt (New York, NY) SOFIVE, Inc.  558,000  01/31/25 (6)
NJ Somerset Various Tenants at Retail Shopping Center  807,000  Various (7)
NY Cheektowaga (Buffalo) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  966,000  08/31/19  
NY Halfmoon (Albany) RGH Enterprises, Inc. (Cardinal Health)  607,000  11/30/21  
NY Hamburg (Buffalo) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,313,000  03/31/31  
OH Bedford Heights (Cleveland) FedEx Corporation  436,000  08/31/28 (1)
OH Cincinnati The American Bottling Company (Keurig Dr Pepper)  481,000  09/30/29  
OH Kenton International Paper Company  1,244,000  08/31/27  
OH Lebanon (Cincinnati) Siemens Real Estate  464,000  04/30/24 (1)(8)
OH Monroe (Cincinnati) UGN, Inc.  1,070,000  02/28/30  
OH Richfield (Cleveland) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,493,000  09/30/24  
OH Stow Mickey Thompson (Cooper Tire)  1,501,000  08/31/27  
OH Streetsboro (Cleveland) Best Buy Warehousing Logistics, Inc.  1,676,000  01/31/22  
OH West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  543,000  08/31/23  
OK Oklahoma City Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Amazon.com. Inc.)  1,884,000  10/31/27  
OK Oklahoma City Bunzl Distribution Oklahoma, Inc.  722,000  08/31/24  
OK Oklahoma City FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,048,000  06/30/25  
OK Tulsa The American Bottling Company (Keurig Dr Pepper)  262,000  02/28/24  
PA Altoona FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  651,000  08/31/23  
PA Imperial (Pittsburgh) General Electric Company  1,321,000  12/31/25  
PA Monaca (Pittsburgh) NF&M International, Inc.  835,000  12/31/24  
SC Aiken (Augusta, GA) Autoneum North America, Inc.  1,703,000  04/30/32  
SC Charleston FedEx Corporation  1,315,000  08/31/32  
SC Charleston FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,713,000  06/30/33  
SC Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,581,000  08/31/28  
SC Hanahan (Charleston) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  675,000  11/30/18 (1)(9)
SC Hanahan (Charleston) Science Applications International Corporation  1,491,000  04/30/19  
TN Chattanooga FedEx Corporation  319,000  10/31/22 (1)
TN Lebanon (Nashville) CBOCS Distribution, Inc. (Cracker Barrel)  1,447,000  06/30/24  
TN Memphis FedEx Corporation  1,384,000  05/31/29 (8)
TN Shelby County N/A- Land  -0-  N/A  
TX Carrollton (Dallas) Carrier Enterprise, LLC (United Technologies)  1,241,000  01/31/24 (1)
TX Corpus Christi FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  436,000  08/31/21  
TX Edinburg FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,097,000  09/30/26  
TX El Paso FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,345,000  09/30/23  
TX Ft. Worth (Dallas) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,373,000  04/30/30  
TX Houston National Oilwell Varco, Inc.  754,000  09/30/22  
TX Lindale (Tyler) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  725,000  06/30/24  
TX Mesquite (Dallas) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  3,195,000  03/31/32  
TX Spring (Houston) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,581,000  09/30/24  
TX Waco FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,078,000  08/31/25  
VA Charlottesville FedEx Corporation  329,000  08/31/27  
VA Mechanicsville (Richmond) FedEx Corporation  541,000  04/30/23  
VA Richmond Carrier Enterprise, LLC (United Technologies)  324,000  11/30/18 (9)
VA Roanoke CHEP USA, Inc.  500,000  02/28/25 (10)
VA Roanoke FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  755,000  04/30/23  
WA Burlington (Seattle/Everett) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,962,000  08/31/30  
WI Cudahy (Milwaukee) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  827,000  06/30/27  
WI Green Bay FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  468,000  05/30/23  
      $126,792,000     

 

 20 

 

 (7)(1)Extension has been executed. See fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 renewal and extension chart.
(2)The lease has an early termination option which may be exercised after December 2025, on the condition that we are provided with six months notice and the tenant pays us a $92,000 termination fee.
(3)Lease has an early termination option which may be exercised after January 1, 2016 but before December 31, 2016,June 2022, on the condition that the Company iswe are provided with six months of notice and the tenant pays the Companyus a $213,462 termination fee. Additionally, the lease has an early termination option which may be exercised after January 1, 2017, on the condition that the Company is provided with six months of notice and the tenant pays the Company a $106,731$1,102,097 termination fee.
 (4)Property is leased to two tenants.
 (8)On July 29, 2016, a 246,434 square foot expansion was completed for a cost of approximately $9,785,000 resulting in a new 12 year lease which extended the original lease expiration date from April 2023 through July 2028 and increased the building size from 615,455 to 861,889 square feet. In addition, the expansion resulted in an initial increase in annual rent effective on the date of completion of approximately $847,000 from approximately $1,943,000, or $3.16 per square foot to approximately $2,790,000, or $3.24 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will increase each year by 1.5%.
(9)(5)Lease has an early termination option which may be exercised if tenant gives six months of notice at any time.
 
(10)(6)Estimated annual rent is the full annual rent per the lease. The Company consolidatesWe consolidate the results of this property due to itsour 51% controlling equity interest.
 (7)
(11)The Company ownsWe own a 67% controlling equity interest. Estimated annual rent reflects the Company’sour proportionate share of the total rent.
 (8)We have agreed to the renewal terms with the tenant and the finalized signed lease is forthcoming.
 (12)(9)Not reflected above - On October 1, 2016, a 50,741 square foot expansion of the building was completed for a cost of approximately $4,988,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 through September 2026 and increased the building size from 113,582 to 164,323 square feet. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $5.27 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000, or $6.68 per square foot.Tenant will not be renewing, property is currently being marketed.
 
(13)(10)Lease has an early termination option which may be exercised after August 2021, on the condition that the Company iswe are provided with six months of notice and the tenant pays the Companyus a $500,000 termination fee.

 

All

As of September 30, 2018, all improved properties were 100% occupied, at September 30, 2016 except for one property located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA consisting of a 59,425255,658 rentable square feet building situated on 4.78 acres locatedof which 68% or 174,802 square feet is occupied, resulting in White Bear Lake, MN. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2016, the Company sold this propertya 99.6% overall occupancy percentage for $4,272,000 which increased our occupancy rate from 99.6% to 100.0%.whole portfolio of properties.

 

The Company’sOur weighted-average lease expiration was 7.48.1 years and 7.27.9 years as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

Our average occupancy rates as of the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 2014, 2013 and 20122014 were 99.6%, 97.7%99.3%, 95.9%99.6%, 96.0%97.7% and 95.2%95.9%, respectively. The average effective annualized rent per square foot for the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 was $6.01, $5.93, $5.72, $5.48 $5.51, $5.53 and $5.62,$5.51, respectively.

 

Completed expansions that have resulted in increased rents over the fiscal years ended September 30, 20152017 and 20162018

 

Ecommerce has been a major catalyst driving increased demand for the industrial property type, causing an ongoingtype. The shift from traditional brick and mortar retail shopping to shopping on-line.ordering goods on-line has resulted in record occupancy rates for industrial real estate throughout the U.S. Due to the increased demand for industrial space, we have been experiencing an increase in expansion activity at our existing properties.

 

During December 2014, a 62,260 square foot expansion of a building leased to NF&M International, Inc. located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA was completed for a cost of approximately $4,503,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2018 through December 2024. In addition, the expansion resulted in an initial increase in annual rent effective January 1, 2015 from $381,805, or $3.39 per square foot, to $820,000, or $4.69 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will increase in year five of the lease effective January 1, 2020 to $841,600, or $4.81 per square foot, resulting in an annualized rent over the new ten year period of $830,800, or $4.75 per square foot.

During June 2015, a parking lot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in El Paso, TX was completed for a cost of approximately $2,472,000 resulting in an increase in annual rent effective July 1, 2015 from $1,045,610, or $7.25 per square foot to $1,345,289, or $9.33 per square foot. Prior to this parking lot expansion, during September 2013, a 51,765 square foot expansion of the building located at the same property was completed for a cost of approximately $3,800,000 resulting in an increase in annual rent effective October 1, 2013 from $667,584, or $7.27 per square foot, to $1,045,610, or $7.25 per square foot. In addition, the expansion resulted in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2015 through September 2023.

21

During June 2015, a 38,428 square foot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Oklahoma City, OK was completed for a cost of approximately $3,332,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from March 2022 through June 2025. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective August 1, 2015 from $712,532, or $5.94 per square foot, to $1,048,250, or $6.62 per square foot.

During August 2015, a 48,116 square foot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Waco, TX was completed for a cost of approximately $4,125,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from May 2022 through August 2025. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective August 15, 2015 from $659,324, or $6.43 per square foot, to $1,078,383, or $7.16 per square foot.

On July 29, 2016, a 246,434 square foot expansion of a building leased to Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation (“Milwaukee Tool”) located in Olive Branch, MS, which is located in the Memphis, TN MSA, was completed for a cost of approximately $9,785,000. This resulted in a new 12 year lease which extended the original lease expiration date from April 2023 through July 2028 and increased the building size from 615,455 to 861,889 square feet. In addition, the expansion resulted in an initial increase in annual rent effective on the date of completion of approximately $847,000 from approximately $1,943,000, or $3.16 per square foot, to approximately $2,790,000, or $3.24 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will increase each year by 1.5% resulting in an annualized rent over the new twelve year period of approximately $3,020,000, or $3.50 per square foot. In September 2016, in connection with the expansion, the Company refinanced its prior 3.76% interest rate mortgage with its existing lender of this property. At the time of the refinancing, the prior amortizing loan was approximately $13,158,000 and was set to mature in January 2023. The new loan is a 12 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $25,000,000 and will mature in October 2028. The interest rate of the new loan remained the same as the prior loan at a fixed interest rate of 3.76%.

On August 1, 2016, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Tampa, FL was completed for a cost of approximately $1,303,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from June 2024 through July 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $131,000 from approximately $1,493,000, or $8.74 per square foot to approximately $1,624,000, or $9.51 per square foot.

On August 1, 2016, a 14,941 square foot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Huntsville, AL was completed for a cost of approximately $1,925,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from August 2022 through July 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $193,000 from approximately $412,000, or $5.59 per square foot, to approximately $605,000 or $6.82 per square foot.

On October 1, 2016, a 50,74150,625 square foot expansion of the building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Edinburg, TX was completed for a cost of approximately $4,988,000,$4,762,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 throughto September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $5.27$5.26 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000, or $6.68 per square foot.

 

On September 1, 2017, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Ft. Myers, FL was completed for a cost of approximately $862,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2026 to August 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $53,000 from approximately $1,365,000, or $6.39 per square foot to approximately $1,418,000, or $6.64 per square foot.

On November 1, 2017, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Indianapolis, IN was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,683,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from April 2024 to October 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $184,000 from approximately $1,533,000, or $4.67 per square foot, to approximately $1,715,000, or $5.23 per square foot.

On September 27, 2018, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Ft. Mill, SC was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,834,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from October 2023 to August 2028. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $183,000 from approximately $1,415,000, or $8.00 per square foot, to approximately $1,598,000, or $9.03 per square foot.

21

Fiscal 2016 renewals2018 Renewals

 

Approximately 2%In fiscal 2018, approximately 8% of the Company’sour gross leasable area, consisting of threerepresenting 16 leases totaling 325,6561,546,637 square feet, was scheduledset to expire. We have renewed 11 of the 16 leases that were set to expire during fiscal 2016. The Company has renewed all three leases, resulting in a 100% tenant retention rate for fiscal 2016. The Company’s tenant retention rate in fiscal 2015 was also 100%. For two2018, representing 1,063,824 square feet, or 69% of the threeexpiring square footage. One of the 11 leases, which is with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., for a property located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC, renewed for only four months, until November 30, 2018, because the tenant moved their operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to our newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC and is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. We closed on this new facility on August 15, 2018. Excluding the four month lease renewal at the 91,776 square foot location, the 10 leases that were scheduled to expire during fiscal 2016,have renewed represent 972,048 square feet, or 63% of the Company did not incur any tenant improvement costs or any leasing costs. For the other lease renewal, the Companyexpiring square footage. We have incurred, or expectswe expect to incur, tenant improvement costs of approximately $210,000$844,000 and leasing commission costs of approximately $133,000.$898,000 in connection with these 10 lease renewals. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the three11 leases which were renewed andrenewed. In addition, the table below includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing commission costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged annually over the renewal term.

 

22

Property Tenant Square Feet  

Former U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent

PSF

  

Former Cash Rent

PSF

  

Former Lease

Expiration

 Renewal U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent PSF  

Renewal Initial

Cash Rent PSF

  Renewal Lease Expiration Renewal Term (years)  

Tenant Improvement Cost

PSF over Renewal Term (1)

  

Leasing Commissions Cost

PSF over Renewal Term (1)

 
                               
Monaca, PA Datatel Resources  80,856  $2.87  $2.87  11/30/15 $3.00  $3.00  11/30/17  2.0  $-0-  $-0- 
Granite City , IL Anheuser- Busch, Inc.  184,800   4.16   4.32  5/31/16  4.36   4.10  11/30/21  5.5   0.21   0.13 
Richmond, VA United Technologies  60,000   4.99   5.24  5/31/16  5.33   5.24  11/30/18  2.5   -0-   -0- 
  Total  325,656                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $3.99  $4.13    $4.20  $4.04     4.1  $0.16  $0.10 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.

The three lease renewals resulted in a weighted average term of 4.1 years and a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $4.20 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is $4.04. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $3.99 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $4.13 per square foot, representing an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 5.3% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 2.2% on a cash basis.

During September 2015, the Company entered into a 5.25 year lease agreement for its previously vacant 148,000 square foot building located in Fayetteville, NC through February 28, 2021. The lease commenced December 1, 2015 and is with Victory Packaging, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, a publicly-owned company. The initial annual rent of $469,160, representing $3.17 per square foot, commenced on March 1, 2016 with 2.5% annual increases thereafter.

During October 2015, the Company entered into a 5.25 year lease agreement for its previously vacant 106,507 square foot building located in Winston-Salem, NC through March 31, 2021. The lease is with Style Crest, Inc. and commenced on January 1, 2016. Initial annual rent of $356,798, representing $3.35 per square foot, commenced on April 1, 2016 with 3.0% annual increases thereafter.

Fiscal 2017 renewals

In fiscal 2017, approximately 10% of our gross leasable area, representing thirteen leases totaling 1,539,526 square feet, is set to expire. As of the date of this Annual Report, five of the thirteen leases have renewed. One of the five leases, (which is with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for a property located in Ft. Myers, FL), has renewed for only eight months because the tenant plans to move its operations from our 87,500 square foot facility to a newly constructed facility, which is also located in Ft. Myers, FL. Once the construction is complete, the Company is under contract to purchase this new facility, consisting of approximately 213,500 square feet, subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements. In addition, once the construction is complete, this brand new facility will be leased for 10 years. Excluding the eight month lease renewal at the Ft. Myers, FL location, the four leases that have renewed thus far represent 500,722 square feet, or 33% of the expiring square footage, and have a weighted average lease term of 8.0 years.

The Company has incurred or expects to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $1,928,000 and leasing costs of approximately $587,000 in connection with four of the five lease renewals. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the five leases which were renewed and includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged over the renewal term.

23


 

Property

 

 

 

Tenant

 

 

 

Square

Feet

  

Forme

U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent

PSF

  

Former

Cash Rent

PSF

  

Former

Lease

Expiration

 

Renewal

U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent

PSF

  

Renewal

Initial

Cash Rent

PSF

  

Renewal

Lease

Expiration

 Renewal Term (years)

 

Tenant

Improvement

Cost

PSF over

Renewal

Term (1)

  

Leasing

Commissions Cost

PSF over

Renewal

Term (1)

 
                               
Ft. Myers, FL FedEx Ground 87,500  $4.95  $4.95  10/31/16 $4.95  $4.95  6/30/17 0.7  $0.00  $0.00 
                               
Elgin, IL Joseph T. Ryerson  89,052  $5.68  $5.68  1/31/17 $5.68  $5.68  1/31/20  3.0  $0.17  $0.17 
Newington, CT Kellogg Sales Co.  54,812  $6.00  $6.00  2/28/17 $6.00  $6.00  2/29/20  3.0  $0.30  $0.24 
Schaumburg, IL FedEx Express  73,500  $6.88  $7.00  3/31/17 $6.50  $6.50  3/31/27  10.0  $0.24  $0.13 
Tolleson, AZ Western Container  283,358  $4.33  $4.59  4/30/17 $4.78  $4.33  4/30/27  10.0  $0.58  $0.14 
  Total (2)  500,722                                 
                                       
Weighted Average (2)       $5.13  $5.29    $5.33  $5.07     8.0  $0.48  $0.15 

 

 

Property

 

 

 

Tenant

 

 

 

Square

Feet

  

Former

U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent

PSF

  

Former

Cash Rent

PSF

  

Former

Lease

Expiration

 

Renewal

U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent

PSF

  

Renewal

Initial

Cash Rent

PSF

  

Renewal

Lease

Expiration

 

Renewal

Term

(years)

  

Tenant

Improvement

Cost

PSF over

Renewal

Term (1)

  

Leasing

Commission Cost

PSF over

Renewal

Term (1)

 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (3) 

 

FedEx Ground

  91,776  $7.35  $7.35  07/31/18 $7.35  $7.35  11/30/18  0.3  $-0-  $-0- 
                                       
Chattanooga, TN FedEx Express  60,637  $5.13  $5.13  10/31/17 $5.26  $5.26  10/31/22  5.0  $0.44  $0.10 
Lakeland, FL FedEx Express  32,105   4.83   4.83  11/30/17  4.83   4.83  11/30/27  10.0   0.19   0.10 
Orlando, FL FedEx Express  110,638   5.69   6.02  11/30/17  6.02   6.02  11/30/27  10.0   0.20   0.12 
St. Joseph, MO Altec Industries  126,880   2.75   2.75  02/28/18  2.94   2.87  02/28/23  5.0   -0-   0.13 
Edwardsville, KS Carlisle Tire  179,280   4.23   4.39  05/31/18  4.10   4.15  07/31/23  5.2   0.05   0.16 
Augusta, GA FedEx Ground  59,358   7.64   7.64  06/30/18  8.64   8.64  06/30/21  3.0   -0-   -0- 
O’Fallon, MO Pittsburgh Glass Works  102,135   4.18   4.18  06/30/18  4.37   4.31  06/30/21  3.0   0.08   -0- 
Denver, CO FedEx Ground  69,865   8.08   8.08  07/31/18  8.72   8.72  10/31/25  7.3   -0-   0.17 
Beltsville, MD FedEx Ground  148,881   9.58   9.58  07/31/18  9.77   9.77  07/31/28  10.0   -0-   0.20 
Bedford Heights, OH FedEx Express  82,269   4.96   4.96  08/31/18  5.33   5.33  08/31/28  10.0   0.43   0.11 
  Total (2)  972,048                                 
                                       
Weighted Average (2)       $5.64  $5.71    $5.87  $5.87     6.8  $0.13  $0.14 

 

 (1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
 (2)Total“Total” and Weighted Average“Weighted Average” amounts exclude the Ft. Myers, FLshort-term renewal of the Hanahan (Charleston), SC property.
(3)Renewed for only four months because the tenant moved its operations from our 91,776 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC to a brand new, build-to-suit, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. We purchased the new facility on August 15, 2018.

 

Excluding the eight-monthfour-month lease renewal at the Ft. Myers, FLHanahan (Charleston), SC location, the remaining four10 lease renewals resultsresult in a weighted average term of 8.06.8 years and a renewed U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $5.33$5.87 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent is also $5.87 per square foot is $5.07.foot. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $5.13$5.64 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.29$5.71 per square foot, representing an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 3.9%4.1% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 2.8% on a cash basis.

As further described in the three paragraphs below, of the five remaining leases originally set to expire during fiscal 2018 that did not renew, three of the properties were sold and one of the properties was re-tenanted. The three properties that were sold represent 12% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018, and one property, representing 14% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018, was re-tenanted for 3 years. The remaining lease that did not renew, expired on December 31, 2017 and represents 5% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018. This tenant leased 80,856 square feet at our 255,658 square foot industrial park located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA. This partially vacant property currently represents our only property with vacancy.

22

Two leases were set to expire during fiscal 2018 with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) for our 65,067 square foot facility located in Kansas City, MO through July 31, 2018 and our 50,400 square foot facility located in Orangeburg, NY through February 28, 2018. Kellogg informed us that they would not be renewing these leases. On December 18, 2017, we sold our property located in Kansas City, MO for $4,900,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $4,602,000 and on December 22, 2017, we sold our property located in Orangeburg, NY for $6,170,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,898,000. The sale of these two properties resulted in a realized gain of approximately $5,388,000, representing a 105% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a realized net gain of approximately $1,804,000, representing a 21% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis. In conjunction with the sale of these two properties, we simultaneously entered into a lease termination agreement for each property whereby we received a termination fee from Kellogg totaling approximately $210,000 which represents a weighted average of 80% of the then remaining rent due under each respective lease.

On June 1, 2018, we sold a 68,370 square foot building located in Colorado Springs, CO for $5,800,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,465,000, which was our approximate U.S. GAAP net book carrying value. Prior to the sale of this property, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through September 2018. The tenant informed us that they would not be renewing this lease because they have moved their operations from our former 68,370 square foot facility to our newly constructed 225,362 square foot facility, which is also located in Colorado Springs, CO. On June 9, 2016, we purchased this newly constructed 225,362 square foot industrial building, which is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through January 2026.

Another remaining lease that was set to expire during fiscal 2018 was leased to Caterpillar Logistics Services, Inc. (Caterpillar) at our 218,120 square foot facility located in Griffin, GA through December 31, 2017. In September 2017, we entered into a three year lease agreement with Rinnai America Corporation through December 31, 2020 for this location. The new lease commenced on January 1, 2018, with initial annual rent of $807,044, representing $3.70 per square foot, with 3.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of $831,000, representing $3.81 per square foot over the life of the lease. This compares to the former U.S. GAAP straight-line and the former cash rent of $5.36 per square foot, resulting in a decrease in the average lease rate of 28.9% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease of 31.0% on a cash basis.

Other Fiscal 2018 Leasing Activity

Effective November 1, 2017, we entered into a 10.2 year lease agreement with FBM Gypsum Supply of Illinois, LLC for our 36,270 square foot facility located in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA. The lease agreement provided for two months of free rent, after which, on January 1, 2018, initial annual rent of $159,588, representing $4.40 per square foot commenced, with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of approximately $172,000, representing $4.74 per square foot through the expiration date of the lease, which is December 31, 2027. This new rent compares to the former average rent of $3.56 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former cash rent of $3.88 per square foot, resulting in an increase in the average lease rate of 33.1% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 13.4% on a cash basis.

Fiscal 2019 Renewals

In fiscal 2019, approximately 7% of our gross leasable area, representing 12 leases totaling 1,485,770 square feet, is set to expire. As of the date of this Annual Report, 5 of the 12 leases have renewed. The five leases that have renewed thus far represent 802,595 square feet, or 54% of the expiring square footage, and have a weighted average lease term of 8.4 years.

We have incurred or we expect to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $1,786,000 and leasing commission costs of approximately $991,000 in connection with these five lease renewals. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the five leases which were renewed. In addition, the table below includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing commission costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged annually over the renewal term.

23

Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Somerset, NJ Taco Bell  21,365  $4.68  $4.68  10/14/18 $5.15  $5.15  10/14/23  5.0  $-0-  $-0- 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX Carrier Enterprise  184,317   8.20   8.55  01/11/19  6.24   6.00  01/31/24  5.0   0.20   0.39 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH (2) Siemens Real Estate  51,130   8.82   9.67  04/30/19  8.94   8.50  04/30/24  5.0   0.40   0.40 
Memphis, TN (2) FedEx Express  449,900   2.84   2.95  05/31/19  3.10   3.10  05/31/29  10.0   0.30   0.09 
Jacksonville, FL FedEx Express  95,883   5.40   5.40  05/31/19  5.59   5.59  05/31/29  10.0   0.16   0.11 
  Total  802,595                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $4.81  $5.00    $4.55  $4.46     8.4  $0.26  $0.15 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
(2)We have agreed to the renewal terms with the tenant and the finalized signed lease is forthcoming.

These five lease renewals result in a weighted average term of 8.4 years and a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $4.55 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is $4.46. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $4.81 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.00 per square foot, resulting in a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 5.4% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 4.2%10.8% on a cash basis.

As discussed above, in the Fiscal 2018 Renewal section, our 91,776 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC, was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and renewed for only four months, until November 30, 2018 because the tenant moved their operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to our newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. The eight remaining leasesnew 265,318 square foot facility is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. In addition, Carrier Enterprise, LLC (United Technologies) informed us that they will not be renewing their lease for our 60,000 square foot facility located in Richmond, VA which expires on November 30, 2018. Both our 91,776 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC and our 60,000 square foot facility located in Richmond, VA are set to expire during fiscal 2017 are under discussion.currently being marketed.

 

On September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we had a weighted average lease maturity of 7.48.1 years with 7.5% of the weighted average gross annualized rent scheduled to expire each year of 8.0%.year.

24

 

The following table presents certain information as of September 30, 2016,2018, with respect to the Company’sour leases expiring over the future fiscal years ended September 30th:

 

Expiration of Fiscal Year Ended September 30th  Property Count  

Total Area

Expiring

(square feet)

  

Annualized

Rent

$

  

Percent of Gross Annualized Rent

%

 
              
Vacant (1)   1   59,425  $-0-   0%
Shopping Center (2)   1   64,138   780,000   1%
2017   9   1,038,804   6,161,000   7%
2018   15   1,324,159   7,760,000   8%
2019   9   1,370,849   7,091,000   8%
2020   4   383,449   2,102,000   2%
2021   7   684,692   3,335,000   4%
2022   7   1,138,320   6,339,000   7%
2023   10   1,302,007   8,019,000   9%
2024   11   1,743,587   10,579,000   12%
2025   9   2,404,478   11,989,000   13%
2026   5   748,154   6,182,000   7%
2027   3   395,691   2,189,000   2%
2028   1   861,889   2,934,000   3%
2029   2   262,613   1,513,000   2%
2030   4   1,044,832   7,366,000   8%
2031   2   624,685   4,800,000   5%
2033   1   558,600   2,166,000   2%
Total (3)   99   16,010,372  $91,305,000   100%

24
Expiration of Fiscal Year Ended September 30th Property Count Total Area
Expiring
(square feet)
  Annualized
Rent
  Percent of Gross
Annualized Rent
 
            
Vacant (1) 1  80,856  $-0-   0%
Shopping Center (2) 1  64,220   807,000   1%
2019 6  681,395   3,914,000   3%
2020 4  383,449   2,129,000   2%
2021 10  1,206,723   5,467,000   4%
2022 7  1,138,320   6,419,000   5%
2023 13  1,668,804   9,481,000   7%
2024 12  1,584,634   10,094,000   8%
2025 9  2,404,478   12,271,000   10%
2026 7  982,226   7,922,000   6%
2027 11  2,304,616   12,629,000   10%
2028 11  2,571,915   13,826,000   11%
2029 5  1,171,338   5,454,000   4%
2030 4  1,044,832   7,403,000   6%
2031 3  963,269   7,122,000   6%
2032 6  1,724,838   13,134,000   10%
2033 2  639,068   6,514,000   5%
2034 1  558,600   2,206,000   2%
Total (3) 111  21,173,581  $126,792,000   100%

  

 (1)“Vacant” represents one property consisting of a 59,42580,856 square feet at our 255,658 square foot building situated on 4.78 acresindustrial park located in White Bear Lake, MN. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building for $4,272,000 which increased the occupancy rate to 100.0%.Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA.
 (2)Shopping Center” represents a multi-tenanted property which has lease expirations ranging from month-to-month to 2029.2030.
 (3)IncludedThe property located in 2018Monaca (Pittsburg), PA is Datatel Resources and included in 2025“Vacant” and is included in “2025” for its lease with NF&M International which both occupy one property and therefore areis counted as one property in the property count total. Included in 2017“2021” is Woodstream Corporation and included in 2018“2023” is Altec Industries, Inc., both of which both occupy one property and therefore areis counted as one property in the property count total.

 

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

None.

 

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

None.

 

 25 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Market Information

 

Since June 1, 2010, the common stock of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, $0.01 par value per share (common stock), has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), under the symbol “MNR”. Previously, the common stock was traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The per share range of high and low market prices and distributions paid to common shareholders during each fiscal quarter of the last two fiscal years ended September 30th were as follows:

Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015
Market Price Market Price
Fiscal Qtr. High  Low  Distrib.  Fiscal Qtr. High  Low  Distrib. 
                     
First $10.72  $9.50  $0.16  First $11.62  $10.10  $0.15 
Second  12.03   9.63   0.16  Second  12.07   10.64   0.15 
Third  13.26   11.22   0.16  Third  11.30   9.30   0.15 
Fourth  14.92   13.15   0.16  Fourth  10.09   9.02   0.15 
          $0.64            $0.60 

On November 15, 2016, the closing price of our common stock was $13.24.

 

Shareholder Information

 

As of November 15, 2016, there were 1,3592018, 1,278 shareholders of record who held shares of our common stock of the Company.

Distributions and Dividends

On October 1, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 6.7% increase in the Company’s quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.16 per share from $0.15 per share. On October 3, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.16 per share to be paid on December 15, 2016, to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2016. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.64 per share. The Company has maintained or increased its cash dividend for twenty-five consecutive years. The Company paid the distributions from cash flows from operations. The Company’s common stock dividend policy is dependent upon the Company’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, availability and cost of bank financing and other factors considered relevant by the Board of Directors. It is the Company’s intention to continue making comparable quarterly distributions in the future and to grow its distributions over time.stock.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

None.

 

26

Purchases of Equity Securities

 

On January 19, 2016,16, 2018, the Board of Directors reaffirmed itsour Share Repurchase Program (the Repurchase(Repurchase Program) that authorizes the Companyus to purchase up to $10,000,000 in the aggregate of the Company’sour common stock. The Repurchase Program was originally created on March 3, 2009 and is intended to be implemented through purchases made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or block trades, or by any combination of such methods, in accordance with applicable insider trading and other securities laws and regulations. The size, scope and timing of any purchases will be based on business, market and other conditions and factors, including price, regulatory and contractual requirements or consents, and capital availability. The Repurchase Program does not require the Companyus to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the program may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time at the Company’sour discretion without prior notice. As ofDuring the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we did not reacquire any of itsour own shares of Common Stock.common stock. The maximum dollar value that may be purchased under the Repurchase Program as of September 30, 20162018 is $10,000,000.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The Company has a Stock OptionAt our Annual Meeting held on May 18, 2017, our common shareholders approved our Amended and StockRestated 2007 Incentive Award Plan adopted in(the Plan) which extended the term of our 2007 and amended and restated in 2010 (the 2007 Plan) authorizing the grant to officers and key employees of options to purchase up to 1,500,000Incentive Award Plan for an additional 10 years, until March 13, 2027, added 1,600,000 shares of common stock including up to 100,000 sharesthe share reserve, expanded the types of restricted stock awards in any one fiscal year.available for grant under the Plan and made other improvements to the 2007 Plan. As of September 30, 2016,2018, there were 444,8781,671,872 shares available for grant as stock options, or restricted stock and other equity-based awards under the 2007 Plan. During fiscal 2016,2018, options to purchase 65,000 shares were granted with an exercise price of $10.37$17.80 and options to purchase 245,00040,000 shares were exercised at a weighted averagean exercise price of $7.69$14.24 per share for total proceeds of $1,883,300.$569,600. In addition, during fiscal 2016, 40,0002018, 12,500 shares of restricted common stock were granted with a fair value on the grant date of $13.64$16.47 per share. In addition, during fiscal 2018, 3,670 unrestricted shares of common stock were granted with a weighted average fair value on the grant date of $16.10 per share. See Note 9 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K for a description of the plan. See Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters for a table of beneficial ownership of the Company’sour common stock.

26

 

The following table summarizes information, as of September 30, 2016,2018, relating to theour equity compensation plan of the Company (including individual compensation arrangements) pursuant to which our equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance:

 

  Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan (excluding Securities reflected in column (a)) 
Plan Category (a)  (b)  (c) 
          
Equity Compensation Plan Approved by Security Holders  455,000  $9.46   444,878 
             
Equity Compensation Plan not Approved by Security Holders  

N/A

  

N/A

   

N/A

 
             
Total  455,000  $9.46   444,878 

27
  Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan (excluding Securities reflected in column (a)) 
Plan Category (a)  (b)  (c) 
          
Equity Compensation Plan Approved by Security Holders  695,000  $12.17   1,671,872 
             
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders  -   -   - 
             
Total  695,000  $12.17   1,671,872 

 

Comparative Stock Performance

 

The following line graph compares the total return of the Company’sour common stock for the last five fiscal years to the FTSE NAREIT Composite Index (US), published by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), and the S&P 500 Index for the same period. The graph assumes a $100 investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes listed below on September 30, 20112013 and the reinvestment of all dividends. The total return reflects stock price appreciation and dividend reinvestment for all three comparative indices. The information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but neither its accuracy nor its completeness is guaranteed. Our stock performance shown in the graph below is not indicative of future stock performance.

 

 

 2827 

 

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following table sets forth selected financial and other information for the Companyon us for the periods and as of the dates indicated. This table should be read in conjunction with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and all of the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

 

  September 30, 
  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012 
OPERATING DATA:                    
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $94,916,110  $77,775,497  $64,672,341  $54,607,086  $50,368,931 
Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses  (14,729,300)  (12,490,019)  (11,317,479)  (9,228,610)  (8,832,027)
Net Operating Income - NOI  80,186,810   65,285,478   53,354,862   45,378,476   41,536,904 
Lease Termination Income  -0-   238,625   1,182,890   690,730   3,222,283 
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions, net  4,398,599   805,513   2,166,766   7,133,252   6,044,065 
Dividend and Interest Income  5,616,392   3,723,867   3,882,597   3,885,920   3,358,674 
General & Administrative Expenses  (7,936,124)  (6,305,928)  (5,709,937)  (4,982,945)  (5,609,558)
Acquisition Costs  (730,441)  (1,546,088)  (481,880)  (514,699)  (667,799)
Interest Expense  (21,836,811)  (18,558,150)  (16,104,678)  (14,956,954)  (15,352,499)
Depreciation & Amortization Expense  (27,203,918)  (23,058,744)  (18,445,326)  (15,530,094)  (13,832,305)
Income from Continuing Operations  32,494,507   20,584,573   19,845,294   21,103,686   18,699,765 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  -0-   5,021,242   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations  -0-   -0-   -0-   291,560   (15,270)
Net Income  32,494,507   25,605,815   19,845,294   21,395,246   18,684,495 
Preferred Dividends  (9,020,470)  (8,607,032)  (8,607,032)  (8,607,032)  (5,513,126)
Redemption of Preferred Stock  (2,942,149)  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Net Income Attributable
to Common Shareholders
 $20,531,888  $16,998,783  $11,238,262  $12,788,214  $13,171,369 
Income from Continuing Operations Per Share                    
Basic $0.50  $0.43  $0.40  $0.49  $0.47 
Diluted  0.50   0.43   0.40   0.49   0.47 
Net Income Attributable to Common
Shareholders Per Share
                    
Basic  0.31   0.29   0.23   0.30   0.33 
Diluted  0.31   0.29   0.23   0.30   0.33 
                     
BALANCE SHEET DATA:                    
Total Assets $1,229,758,028  $915,991,942  $743,756,700  $617,240,866  $574,507,702 
Real Estate Investments, Net  1,022,483,326   816,111,266   636,710,590   536,770,636   467,865,198 
Mortgage Notes Payable  483,748,153   373,991,174   287,796,006   250,093,382   237,943,911 
Loans Payable  80,790,684   85,041,386   25,200,000   22,200,000   5,200,000 
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  53,493,750   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
8% Subordinated Convertible Debentures  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   8,615,000 
7.625% Series A Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock
  -0-   53,493,750   53,493,750   53,493,750   53,493,750 
7.875% Series B Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock
  57,500,000   57,500,000   57,500,000   57,500,000   57,500,000 
6.125% Series C Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock
  135,000,000   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total Shareholders’ Equity  597,858,098   446,010,640   420,631,082   335,914,971   315,687,139 
                     
CASH FLOW DATA:                    
Net Cash Provided (Used) By:                    
Operating Activities $54,699,500  $38,062,285  $34,856,285  $27,463,529  $26,808,821 
Investing Activities  (227,845,089)  (194,469,735)  (131,809,697)  (60,373,084)  (80,640,038)
Financing Activities  256,821,188   148,006,698   105,023,561   20,663,209   72,105,267 

  September 30, 
  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014 
OPERATING DATA:                    
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $139,161,849  $116,385,305  $97,755,433  $77,775,497  $64,672,341 
Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses  (24,390,117)  (20,154,556)  (17,568,623)  (12,490,019)  (11,317,479)
Net Operating Income - NOI  114,771,732   96,230,749   80,186,810   65,285,478   53,354,862 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0-   238,625   1,182,890 
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  111,387   2,311,714   4,398,599   805,513   2,166,766 
Dividend and Interest Income  13,120,465   6,930,564   5,616,392   3,723,867   3,882,597 
General and Administrative Expenses  (8,776,579)  (7,809,546)  (7,936,124)  (6,305,928)  (5,709,937)
Acquisition Costs  -0-   (178,526)  (730,441)  (1,546,088)  (481,880)
Interest Expense (1)  (32,349,705)  (25,754,121)  (22,953,049)  (19,844,166)  (16,830,423)
Depreciation & Amortization Expense  (38,567,027)  (31,459,749)  (26,087,680)  (21,772,728)  (17,719,581)
Income from Continuing Operations  48,520,534   40,271,085   32,494,507   20,584,573   19,845,294 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments  7,485,266   -0-   -0-   5,021,242   -0- 
Net Income  56,005,800   40,271,085   32,494,507   25,605,815   19,845,294 
Preferred Dividends  (17,190,456)  (14,861,686)  (9,020,470)  (8,607,032)  (8,607,032)
Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   (2,467,165)  (2,942,149)  -0-   -0- 

Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders

 $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888  $16,998,783  $11,238,262 
Net Income Per Share                    

     Basic

 $0.71  $0.56  $0.50  $0.43  $0.40 
Diluted  0.71   0.56   0.50   0.43   0.40 

Net Income Attributable to Common

Shareholders Per Share

                    
Basic  0.49   0.32   0.31   0.29   0.23 
Diluted  0.49   0.32   0.31   0.29   0.23 

(1)Amortization expense related to Financing Costs are included in “Interest Expense”.

  

  September 30, 
OTHER INFORMATION: 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012 
                
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding                    
Basic  65,468,564   59,085,888   49,829,924   42,275,555   39,660,692 
Diluted  65,558,284   59,201,296   49,925,036   42,432,354   39,819,621 
Funds From Operations* $46,598,043  $33,730,447  $29,000,443  $27,338,245  $26,459,005 
Core Funds From Operations* $50,270,633  $35,276,535  $29,482,323  $27,852,944  $27,126,804 
Adjusted Funds From Operations* $45,865,343  $33,976,958  $25,843,710  $19,521,972  $17,685,624 
Cash Dividends per Common Share $0.64  $0.60  $0.60  $0.60  $0.60 

BALANCE SHEET DATA:               
Total Assets $1,718,377,886  $1,443,037,755  $1,223,485,885  $910,905,721  $739,843,222 
Real Estate Investments, net  1,512,512,785   1,260,830,451   1,013,103,314   806,465,906   627,068,988 
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable, net  711,545,649   591,364,371   477,476,010   368,904,953   283,882,528 
Loans Payable  186,608,676   120,091,417   80,790,684   85,041,386   25,200,000 
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  -0-   -0-   53,493,750   -0-   -0- 
7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock  -0-   -0-   -0-   53,493,750   53,493,750 
7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock  -0-   -0-   57,500,000   57,500,000   57,500,000 
6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock  287,200,025   245,986,125   135,000,000   -0-   -0- 
Total Shareholders’ Equity  797,905,767   712,865,696   597,858,098   446,010,640   420,631,082 
                     
CASH FLOW DATA:                    
Net Cash Provided (Used) By:                    
Operating Activities $85,529,162  $73,867,866  $54,699,500  $38,062,285  $34,856,285 
Investing Activities  (332,513,200)  (339,071,013)  (227,845,089)  (194,469,735)  (131,809,697)
Financing Activities  246,082,577   179,679,685   256,821,188   148,006,698   105,023,561 

  September 30, 
 2018  2017  2016  2015  2014 
OTHER INFORMATION:               
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding               
Basic  78,619,440   72,114,078   65,468,564   59,085,888   49,829,924 
Diluted  78,802,208   72,249,691   65,558,284   59,201,296   49,925,036 
Funds From Operations* $69,841,849  $54,442,611  $46,598,043  $33,730,447  $29,000,443 
Core Funds From Operations* $69,841,849  $57,088,302  $50,270,633  $35,276,535  $29,482,323 
Adjusted Funds From Operations* $68,375,031  $54,880,438  $45,865,343  $33,976,958  $25,843,710 
Cash Dividends per Common Share $0.68  $0.64  $0.64  $0.60  $0.60 

 

 2928 

 

* We assess and measure our overall operating results based upon an industry performance measure referred to as Funds From Operations (FFO), which management believeswe believe is a useful indicator of our operating performance. FFO is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure of a REIT. FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), represents net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders, as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), excluding extraordinary items, as defined under U.S. GAAP, gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated real estate assets, impairment charges related to depreciable real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization. FFO includes gains and losses realized on sale of securities investments. NAREIT created FFO as a non-U.S. GAAPnon-GAAP supplemental measure of REIT operating performance. We define Core Funds From Operations (Core FFO) as FFO, excludingplus acquisition costs and costs associated with the Redemption of Preferred Stock. We define Adjusted Funds fromFrom Operations (AFFO) as Core FFO, excluding stock based compensation expense, depreciation of corporate office tenant improvements, amortization of deferred financing costs, lease termination income, net gain or loss on sale of securities transactions, effect of non-cash U.S. GAAP straight-line rent adjustments, non-recurring other expenses and lesssubtracting recurring capital expenditures. We define recurring capital expenditures as all capital expenditures that are recurring in nature, excluding capital expenditures related to expansions at our current locations or capital expenditures that are incurred in conjunction with obtaining a new lease or a lease renewal. We believe that, as widely recognized measures of performance used by other REITs, FFO, Core FFO and AFFO may be considered by investors as supplemental measures to compare our operating performance to those of other REITs. FFO, Core FFO and AFFO exclude historical cost depreciation as an expense and may facilitate the comparison of REITs which have a different cost basis. However, other REITs may use different methodologies to calculate FFO, Core FFO and AFFO and, accordingly, our FFO, Core FFO and AFFO may not be comparable to all other REITs. The items excluded from FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are significant components in understanding the Company’sour financial performance.

 

FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are non-GAAP performance measures and (i) do not represent Cash Flow from Operations as defined by U.S. GAAP; (ii) should not be considered as an alternative to Net Income or Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders as a measure of operating performance or to Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities; and (iii) are not an alternative to cash flowCash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities as a measure of liquidity. FFO, Core FFO and AFFO, as calculated by the Company,us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other REITs.

 

The following is a reconciliation of the Company’sour U.S. GAAP Net Income to the Company’sour FFO, Core FFO and AFFO for the fiscal years ended September 30th:

 

 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $20,531,888  $16,998,783  $11,238,262  $12,788,214  $13,171,369  $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888  $16,998,783  $11,238,262 
Plus: Depreciation Expense (including Discontinued Operations & excluding Corporate Office)  23,931,530   19,625,748   15,908,769   12,877,385   11,471,070 
Plus: Depreciation Expense (Excluding Corporate Office)  36,017,959   29,478,322   23,931,530   19,625,748   15,908,769 
Plus: Amortization of Intangible Assets  1,178,744   1,370,654   1,347,936   1,543,298   1,477,356   1,613,368   1,071,719   1,178,744   1,370,654   1,347,936 
Plus: Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs  955,881   756,504   505,476   475,142   330,990   880,444   855,000   955,881   756,504   505,476 
(Gain) Loss on Sale of Depreciable Assets  -0-   (5,021,242)  -0-   (345,794)  8,220 
Less: (Gain) / Plus: Loss on Sale of Real Estate Investments  (7,485,266)  95,336   -0-   (5,021,242)  -0- 
FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders  46,598,043   33,730,447   29,000,443   27,338,245   26,459,005   69,841,849   54,442,611   46,598,043   33,730,447   29,000,443 
Plus: Acquisition Costs  730,441   1,546,088   481,880   514,699   667,799   -0-   178,526   730,441   1,546,088   481,880 
Plus: Redemption of Preferred Stock  2,942,149   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   2,467,165   2,942,149   -0-   -0- 
Core FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders  50,270,633   35,276,535   29,482,323   27,852,944   27,126,804   69,841,849   57,088,302   50,270,633   35,276,535   29,482,323 
Plus: Stock Compensation Expense  926,465   448,895   347,002   329,148   593,811   433,895   624,706   926,465   448,895   347,002 
Plus: Depreciation of Corporate Office Tenant Improvements  123,492   79,572   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Plus: Depreciation of Corporate Office Capitalized Costs  157,964   156,676   123,492   79,572   -0- 
Plus: Amortization of Financing Costs  1,116,238   1,286,016   725,745   647,112   630,969   1,220,983   1,234,259   1,116,238   1,286,016   725,745 
Plus: Non-recurring Other Expense (1)  500,000   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   500,000   -0-   -0- 
Less: Lease Termination Income  -0-   (238,625)  (1,182,890)  (690,730)  (3,222,283)  (210,261)  -0-   -0-   (238,625)  (1,182,890)
Less: Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions, net  (4,398,599)  (805,513)  (2,166,766)  (7,133,252)  (6,044,065)
Less: U.S. GAAP Straight-line Rent Adjustment  (1,709,821)  (1,446,264)  (600,745)  (943,785)  (553,474)
Less: Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (111,387)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)  (805,513)  (2,166,766)
Less: Effect of non-cash U.S. GAAP Straight-line Rent Adjustment  (1,972,588)  (1,027,927)  (1,709,821)  (1,446,264)  (600,745)
Less: Recurring Capital Expenditures  (963,065)  (623,658)  (760,959)  (539,465)  (846,138)  (985,424)  (883,864)  (963,065)  (623,658)  (760,959)
AFFO Attributable to Common Shareholders $45,865,343  $33,976,958  $25,843,710  $19,521,972  $17,685,624  $68,375,031  $54,880,438  $45,865,343  $33,976,958  $25,843,710 

 

(1)Consists of one-time payroll expenditures in fiscal 2016.

.

 3029 

 

ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

Statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”)(Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)(Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements provide the Company’sour current expectations or forecasts of future events. Forward-lookingIn particular, statements include statements about the Company’s expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events,relating to our liquidity and capital resources, portfolio performance and underlyingresults of operations contain forward-looking statements. Furthermore, all of the statements regarding future financial performance are forward-looking statements. We are including this cautionary statement to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Securities Act and Exchange Act for any such forward-looking statements. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this Form 10-K are based on management’s belief and assumptions made by, and other statements that are not historical facts.information currently available to, management. Forward-looking statements can be identified by their use of forward-looking words, such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “should,” “seek” or comparable terms, or the negative use of those words, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, performance and underlying assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts.

 

The forward-looking statements are based on the Company’sour beliefs, assumptions and expectations of itsour future performance, taking into account all information currently available to the Company.us. Forward-looking statements are not predictions of future events. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to the Company.us. Some of these factors are described below and under the headings “Business”, “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. These and other risks, uncertainties and factors could cause the Company’sour actual results to differ materially from those included in any forward-looking statements the Company makes.we make. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for the Companyus to predict those events or how they may affect the Company.us. Except as required by law, the Company iswe are not obligated to, and doeswe do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’sour expectations include, among others:

 

 the ability of the Company’sour tenants to make payments under their respective leases, itsleases;
our reliance on certain major tenants and the Company’stenants;
our ability to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or that become vacant;
   
 the Company’sour ability to obtain suitable tenants for itsour properties;
   
 changes in real estate market conditions, economic conditions in the industrial sector, and the marketmarkets in which the Company’sour properties are located and general economic conditions;
   
 the inherent risks associated with owning real estate, including local real estate market conditions, governing laws and regulations and illiquidity of real estate investments;
   
 the Company’sour ability to acquire, finance and sell properties on attractive terms;
   
 the Company’sour ability to repay debt financing obligations;
   
 the Company’sour ability to refinance amounts outstanding under its mortgages and credit facilitiesour debt obligations at maturity on terms favorable to us, or at all;
   
 the loss of any member of the Company’sour management team;
   
 the Company’sour ability to comply with debt covenants;
   
 the Company’sour ability to integrate acquired properties and operations into existing operations;

30

 continued availability of proceeds from issuances of the Company’sour debt or equity securities;
   
 the availability of other debt and equity financing alternatives;
   
 market conditions affecting the Company’s investmentour investments in marketable securities of other REIT’s;REITs;
   
 changes in interest rates under the Company’sour current credit facility and under any additional variable rate debt arrangements that the Companywe may enter into in the future;
   
 the Company’sour ability to successfully implement the Company’sour selective acquisition strategy;
   
 the Company’sour ability to maintain internal controls and procedures to ensure all transactions are accounted for properly, all relevant disclosures and filings are timely made in accordance with all rules and regulations, and any potential fraud or embezzlement is thwarted or detected;
   
 changes in federal or state tax rules or regulations that could have adverse tax consequences;
   
 declines in the market prices of the Company’sour investment securities; and
   
 the Company’sour ability to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

31

 

You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, as events described or implied in such statements may not occur. The Company undertakesWe undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

 

Overview

 

The CompanyMonmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, founded in 1968, is one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world. We are a self-administered and self-managed REIT. The CompanyREIT that seeks to invest in well-located, modern, single tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. At September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we held investments in ninety-nine111 properties totaling approximately 16,010,00021,174,000 square feet. Total real estate investments were $1,171,313,495$1,719,578,419 at September 30, 2016.2018. These properties are located in thirty30 states: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. All of these properties are wholly-owned, with the exception of an industrial property in New Jersey, in which the Company ownswe own a 51% controlling equity interest, and thea shopping center in New Jersey, in which the Company holdswe own a 67% controlling equity interest.

 

The Company’sOur weighted-average lease expiration was 7.48.1 years and 7.27.9 years as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and itsour average annualized rent per occupied square foot as of September 30, 20162018 and 20152017 was $5.72$6.01 and $5.48,$5.93, respectively. At September 30, 20162018 and 2015, the Company’s2017, our occupancy was 99.6% and 97.7%99.3%, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building for $4,272,000 which increased our occupancy rate to 100.0%. During fiscal 2016, the Company acquired eight industrial properties totaling approximately 1,830,000 square feet for approximately $210,747,000.

 

The Company hasWe have a concentration of properties leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX). As of September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we had approximately 16,010,00021,174,000 square feet of property, of which approximately 7,584,00010,083,000 square feet, or 47%48%, consisting of fifty-three60 separate stand-alone leases, were leased to FDX and its subsidiaries (6%(7% to FDX and 41% to FDX subsidiaries). These properties are located in twenty-four24 different states. As of September 30, 2018, the 60 separate stand-alone leases that are leased to FDX and FDX subsidiaries had a weighted average lease maturity of 9.4 years. The percentage of rental and reimbursement revenue from FDX and its subsidiaries was 56%58% for the year ended September 30, 2016,2018, consisting of 7% leased to FDX and 49%51% leased to FDX subsidiaries. No other tenant accounted for 5% or more of the Company’sour total Rental and Reimbursement revenue for fiscal 2016.2018.

 

In addition to real estate property holdings, the Companywe held $73,604,894$154,920,545 in marketable REIT securities at September 30, 2016,2018, representing 5.3%8.0% of the Company’sour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). These liquid real estate holdings are not included in calculating the tenant concentration ratios above and therefore further enhance the Company’sincrease our diversification. As a result, theThe securities portfolio provides the Companyus with additional diversification, liquidity, diversification,and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available.

 

31

The Company’s

Our revenue primarily consists of rental and reimbursement revenue from the ownership of industrial rental property. Rental and Reimbursement Revenue increased $17,140,613,$22,776,544, or 22%20%, for the year ended September 30, 20162018, as compared to the year ended September 30, 2015.2017. Total expenses (excluding other income and expense) increased $7,368,782,$12,131,346, or 17%20%, for the year ended September 30, 20162018 as compared to the year ended September 30, 2015.2017. The increases were due mainly to the revenue and expenses relating to the property acquisitions made during fiscal 20152018 and 2016.2017.

 

32

Our Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders increased $15,873,110, or 69%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 and increased $2,410,346, or 12%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The increases were due to the purchase of additional properties in fiscal 2018 and 2017.

 

We evaluate our financial performance using Net Operating Income (NOI) from property operations, (NOI)which we believe is defineda useful indicator of our operating performance. NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders plus Redemption of Preferred Stock, Preferred Dividends, General and Administrative Expenses, Acquisition Costs, Depreciation, Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and Intangible Assets, Interest Expense, including Amortization of Financing Costs, less Dividend and Interest Income, Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions, Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments and Lease Termination Income. The components of NOI are recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses, such as insurance, utilities, and repairs and maintenance. Other REITs may use different methodologies to calculate NOI and, accordingly, our NOI may not be comparable to all other REITs.

The following is a reconciliation of our Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders to our NOI for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

  2018  2017  2016 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888 
Plus: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   2,467,165   2,942,149 
Plus: Preferred Dividends  17,190,456   14,861,686   9,020,470 
Plus: General and Administrative Expenses  8,776,579   7,809,546   7,936,124 
Plus: Acquisition Costs  -0-   178,526   730,441 
Plus: Depreciation  36,175,923   29,634,998   24,055,022 
Plus: Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and
Intangible Assets
  2,391,104   1,824,751   2,032,658 
Plus: Interest Expense, including Amortization of
Financing Costs
  32,349,705   25,754,121   22,953,049 
Less: Dividend and Interest Income  (13,120,465)  (6,930,564)  (5,616,392)
Less: Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (111,387)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)
Less: Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments  (7,485,266)  -0-   -0- 
Less: Lease Termination Income  (210,261)  -0-   -0- 
Net Operating Income – NOI $114,771,732  $96,230,749  $80,186,810 

The components of our NOI for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

  2018  2017  2016 
          
Rental Revenue $115,864,119  $97,659,778  $81,592,429 
Reimbursement Revenue  23,297,730   18,725,527   16,163,004 
Total Rental and Reimbursement Revenue  139,161,849   116,385,305   97,755,433 
Real Estate Taxes  (18,596,239)  (15,266,634)  (13,294,724)
Operating Expense  (5,793,878)  (4,887,922)  (4,273,899)
NOI $114,771,732  $96,230,749  $80,186,810 

32

NOI increased $14,901,332,$18,540,983, or 23%19%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162018, as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 20152017 and increased $11,930,616,$16,043,939, or 22%20%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20152017 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.2016. The increase from fiscal year 20152017 to 20162018 was due to the additional income related to eightseven industrial properties purchased during fiscal 20162018 and the purchase of ten industrial properties during fiscal 2015.2017. The increase from fiscal year 20142016 to 20152017 was due to the additional income related to ten industrial properties purchased during fiscal 2015.

The Company’s NOI for2017 and the purchase of eight industrial properties during fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is calculated as follows:2016.

  2016  2015  2014 
          
Rental Revenue $81,592,429  $67,059,385  $55,512,165 
Reimbursement Revenue  13,323,681   10,716,112   9,160,176 
Total Rental and Reimbursement Revenue  94,916,110   77,775,497   64,672,341 
Real Estate Taxes  (10,455,401)  (8,362,135)  (7,605,611)
Operating Expense  (4,273,899)  (4,127,884)  (3,711,868)
NOI $80,186,810  $65,285,478  $53,354,862 

 

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, gross revenue, which includes Rental Revenue, Reimbursement Revenue and Dividend and Interest Income totaled $100,532,502, $81,499,364$152,282,314, $123,315,869 and $68,554,938,$103,371,825, respectively.

 

Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 17, 2016, the Company19, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 338,584347,145 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.0 acres, located in Hamburg, NY, which is in the Buffalo MSA.Trenton, NJ. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen15 years through March 2031.June 2032. The purchase price was $35,100,000. The Company$85,248,352. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $23,500,000$55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.03%4.13%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,308,000.

In addition, subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2016, a 50,741 square foot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Edinburg, TX was substantially completed for a cost of approximately $4,988,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 through September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $5.27 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000, or $6.68 per square foot.

On October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building, (which increased our occupancy rate from 99.6% to 100.0%), consisting of a 59,425 square foot industrial building situated on 4.78 acres located in White Bear Lake, MN for approximately $4,272,000, which is the Company’s approximate U.S. GAAP net book carrying value.$5,328,000.

 

The industrial propertiesproperty purchased expanded and soldthus far during fiscal 2017 to date,2019 increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 16,340,000 and increased our occupancy rate to 100.0%.21,521,000.

33

 

In addition to the property purchased subsequent to theour fiscal yearend, as described above, we have entered into agreements to purchase eighttwo new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Florida, Michigan,Georgia and North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina totalingconsisting of approximately 2,099,000398,000 square feet, each with net-leased terms ranging between tenfrom 10 to fifteen15 years, with a weighted average lease maturityterm of 13.313.4 years. Approximately 1,267,000 square feet, or 60%, is leased to FDX and its subsidiaries.  The purchase price for the eightthese properties is approximately $212,373,000.$68,747,000 and both are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing these eight transactions during the first quarter of fiscal 20172019 and fiscal 2018.2020.  In connection with fiveone of the eightthese properties, the Company haswe have entered into commitmentsa commitment to obtain five mortgages totaling $101,204,000 at fixed rates ranging from 3.60% to 4.20%,a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $17,500,000 with a weighted averagefixed interest rate of 3.83%4.40%. Each of these mortgages will be a fifteen year, fully-amortizing loan. The CompanyWe may make additional acquisitions in fiscal 20172019 and fiscal 20182020, and the funds for these acquisitions may come from funds generated from operations, mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, sale of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the Dividend ReinvestmentDRIP, proceeds from the Preferred Stock ATM Program, and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP),proceeds from private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities. To the extent that funds or appropriate properties are not available, fewer acquisitions will be made.

 

During the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Companywe completed fifteena total of seven property expansions, at thirteen of its locations, consisting of tenthree building expansions and fivefour parking lot expansions. TwoThree of the four parking lot expansions included the purchase of additional land. The tenthree building expansions resulted in approximately 699,000312,000 additional square feet. Total costs for all fifteenseven property expansions were approximately $52,474,000$22,189,000 and resulted in total increased annual rent of approximately $5,180,000. Fourteen$2,090,000. Six completed expansions resulted in a new ten year lease extensionextensions for each property that wasthe expanded properties and one completed expansion resulted in a new twelve year lease extension. The weighted average lease extension for these seven property expansions is 10.9 years.

 

Revenues also include dividendDividend and interest incomeInterest Income and net realized gainGain on securities transactions. The Company holdsSale of Securities Transactions. We hold a portfolio of marketable securities of other REITs with a fair value of $73,604,894$154,920,545 as of September 30, 2016,2018, representing 5.3%8.0% of the Company’sour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). The Company generally limits itsWe limit our marketable securities investments to no more than approximately 10% of itsour undepreciated assets. The Company investsWe invest in REIT securities and, from time to time, may use margin debt when an adequate yield spread can be obtained. As of September 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, there were no draws againstwas $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 outstanding on the margin.margin loan, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan. The REIT securities portfolio provides the Companyus with additional diversification, liquidity, and additional income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available. As of September 30, 2016, the Company’s2018, our portfolio consisted primarily of 81%95% REIT common stocks and 19%5% REIT preferred stocks, all of which are listed on a national securities exchange. The Company’sOur weighted-average yield on the securities portfolio for fiscal 20162018 was approximately 8.0%9.5%. Dividend and Interest incomeIncome for fiscal 20162018 was $5,616,392, and was $3,723,867$13,120,465 compared to $6,930,564 for fiscal 2015.2017. During fiscal 2016, the Company2018, we realized $4,398,599$111,387 in gains on salessale of securities transactions. The Company hasWe have unrealized gainslosses of $12,942,267$24,744,579 in itsour REIT securities portfolio as of September 30, 2016.2018. The dividends received from our securities investments continue to meet our expectations. The Company intendsWe intend to hold these securities for investment on a long-term basis.

 

33

The Company

We had $95,749,508$9,324,585 in cashCash and cash equivalentsCash Equivalents and $73,604,894$154,920,545 in REIT securities as of September 30, 2016. The Company believes2018. We believe that funds generated from operations, the DRIP, themortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, together withcash on hand, sale of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the ability to financeDRIP, proceeds from the Preferred Stock ATM Program, and refinance its properties,proceeds from private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities, will provide sufficient funds to adequately meet itsour obligations over the next several years.

 

The Company hasWe have a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP),DRIP, in which participants can purchase our stock from the Company at a price ofthat is approximately 95% of market value. Amounts received in connection with the DRIP (including dividend reinvestments of $8,369,146, $8,489,169$12,928,356, $10,125,894 and $7,624,528$8,369,146 for fiscal years ended 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015respectively) were $90,028,789, $91,931,831 and 2014, respectively), were $72,175,797 $48,404,556 and $38,090,334 for fiscal years ended 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

 

34

On June 29, 2017, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or B. Riley (formerly FBR Capital Markets & Co.), that provided for the offer and sale of shares of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, or our 6.125% Series C preferred stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) with B. Riley that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000 of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock. We began selling shares through these programs on July 3, 2017. Since inception through September 30, 2018, we sold 3,088,001 shares under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000, of which 1,648,556 shares were sold during the fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $40,094,000. As of September 30, 2018, there is approximately $119,096,000 remaining that may be sold under the Preferred Stock ATM Program.

As of September 30, 2018, 11,488,001 shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, in October 2018, we completed a public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $132,339,000.

 

Industrial space demand is very closely correlated to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth. Despite sevennine years of unprecedented monetary stimulus, real annual GDP growth has averaged less than 2.0% over this period. However, thereEconomic growth has been significantstrong this past year further increasing demand for industrial space and national occupancy rates have continued to increase.space. The most significant demand driver for modern industrial real estate continues to be ecommerce. Every year since the turn of the century, the percentage of goods purchased on-line has increased at a 15%an average 16% annual growth rate. Today, excluding food, fuel, and autos, approximately 10%19% of total retail sales have migrated from traditional store sales to on-line sales. Thissales and we expect this growth in market share to continue. We expect these favorable trendtrends for the industrial real estate sector is expected to be a leading demand driver for the foreseeable future, as consumers continue to embrace the added efficiencies of on-line consumption. New home construction and sales of existing homes has also continued to strengthen. Housing demand typically translates into greater demand for warehouse space. Additionally, automotive sales remain at historic highs and low energy costs have resulted in increased domestic manufacturing. These catalysts have resulted in rising rental rates in most major industrial markets. The strong financial position of our tenants, together with the long duration of our leases, should enableprovides for high quality, reliable income streams throughout the Company to continue to perform well despite the slow growth macro-economic environment.business cycle.

 

The Company intendsWe intend to continue to increase itsour real estate investments in fiscal 20172019 and 20182020 through acquisitions and expansions of our properties. The growth of the real estate portfolio depends on the availability of suitable properties which meet the Company’sour investment criteria and appropriate financing. Competition in the market areas in which the Company operateswe operate is significant and affects acquisitions, occupancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses of certain properties. Transaction costs, such as broker fees, transfer taxes, legal, valuation, and other professional fees related to acquisitions are expensed as incurred.

 

See PART I, Item 1 – Business and Item 1A – Risk Factors for a more complete discussion of the economic and industry-wide factors relevant to the Companyus and the opportunities and challenges, and risks on which the Company iswe are focused.

 

34

Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The discussion and analysis of the Company’sour financial condition and results of operation are based upon the Company’sour consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires managementus to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Company’sour consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

Significant accounting policies are defined as those that involve significant judgment and potentially could result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Management believesWe believe the following significant accounting policies are affected by our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Company’sour consolidated financial statements. For a detailed description of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 in the Notes to the Company’sour Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K.

 

Real Estate Investments

 

The Company appliesWe apply Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360-10, Property, Plant & Equipment (ASC 360-10) to measure impairment in real estate investments. Rental properties are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected future cash flows (on an undiscounted basis without interest) from a rental property is less than its historical net cost basis. These expected future cash flows consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. Upon determination that an other than temporary impairment has occurred, rental properties are reduced to their fair value. For properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the fair value of the property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the property measured at the time there is a commitment to sell the property and/or it is actively being marketed for sale. A property to be disposed of is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less its cost to sell. Subsequent to the date that a property is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded.

 

35

UponPrior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01 on April 1, 2017, upon acquisition of a property, the Company allocateswe allocated the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consistconsisted of land, buildingsbuilding and intangible assets, including above and below market leases and in-place leases. The Company allocatesWe allocated the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property generally determined by third partythe third-party appraisal of the property obtained in conjunction with the purchase. Transaction costs, such as broker fees, transfer taxes, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional and consulting fees, related to acquisitions are expensed as incurred.

The purchase price iswas further allocated to acquired above and below market leases based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place lease rates over the remaining term. In addition, any remaining amounts of the purchase price arewere applied to in-place lease values based on management’sour evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. In-place leases that may have a customer relationship intangible value, including (but not limited to) the nature and extent of the existing relationship with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals arewere also considered. Acquired above and below market leases arewere amortized to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The value of in-place lease intangibles iswas amortized to amortization expense over the remaining lease term. If a tenant terminatesterminated its lease early, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvements, leasing commissions, deferred rent, and the in-place lease value iswas charged to expense when there iswas a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the termination agreement arewere met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration, if any, is probable of collection.

 

The CompanyAs a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-01, effective April 1, 2017, we no longer account for our property acquisitions as business combinations and instead account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets. In an acquisition of assets, certain acquisition costs are capitalized to real estate investments as part of the purchase price as opposed to being expensed as Acquisition Costs under the previous accounting treatment for business combinations. Therefore, as of April 1, 2017, we are no longer required to expense our Acquisition Costs. In addition, acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business combination are accounted for as asset acquisitions whereby the consideration incurred is allocated to the individual assets acquired on a relative fair value basis.

35

We conducted a comprehensive review of all real estate asset classes in accordance with ASC Topic 360,360-10, which indicates that asset values should be analyzed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a property may not be fully recoverable.

 

The following are examples of such events or changes in circumstances that would indicate to managementus that there may be an impairment of a property:

 

 A non-renewal of a lease and subsequent move out by the tenant;
   
 A renewal of a lease at a significantly lower rent than a previous lease;
   
 A significant decrease in the market value of a property;
   
 A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a property is being used or in its physical condition;
   
 A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a property, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;
   
 An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a property;
   
 A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a property; or
   
 A current expectation that, more likely than not, a property will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life.

 

The process entails the analysis of property for instances where the net book value exceeds the estimated fair value. In accordance with ASC Topic 360,360-10, an impairment loss shall be recognized if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The Company utilizesWe utilize the experience and knowledge of itsour internal valuation team to derive certain assumptions used to determine an operating property’s cash flow. Such assumptions include re-leasing and renewal probabilities upon future lease expirations, vacancy factors, rental growth rates, and capital expenditures.

 

36

As part of our review of our property portfolio, we evaluated the one vacant industrial property in our portfoliothat was partially vacant at September 30, 2018. The discounted cash flows expected from the lease applicable to the occupied portion of the property and evaluate that the sum of the discounted cash flows expected forfrom a potential lease applicable to the vacant portion of this property exceeded its historical net cost basis. Management considersWe consider, on a quarterly basis, whether the marketed rent (advertised) or the market rent has decreased or if any additional indicators are present which would indicate a significant decrease in net cash flows. Management typically willWe may obtain an independent appraisal to assist in evaluating a potential impairment for a property thatif it has been vacant for several years. We have also considered the properties which had lease renewals at rental rates lower than the previous rental rates and noted that the sum of the new discounted cash flows expected for the renewed leases exceeded these properties’ historical net cost basis. On October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building consisting of a 59,425 square foot industrial building situated on 4.78 acres located in White Bear Lake, MN for approximately $4,272,000, which is the Company’s approximate U.S. GAAP net book carrying value. As a result of this disposition, our occupancy increased from 99.6% to 100%.

 

The CompanyWe reviewed itsour operating properties in light of the requirements of ASC Topic 360-10 and determined that, as of September 30, 2016,2018, the undiscounted cash flows over the holding period for these properties were in excess of their carrying values and, therefore, no impairment charges were required.

 

Securities Available for Sale

 

Investments in non-real estate assets consist primarily of marketable securities, which the Companywe generally limitslimit to no more than approximately 10% of itsour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). ManagementWe individually reviewsreview and evaluatesevaluate our marketable securities for impairment on a quarterly basis, or when events or circumstances occur. Management considers,We consider, among other things, credit aspects of the issuer, amount of decline in fair value over cost and length of time in a continuous loss position. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, a non-cash impairment charge is recognized in earnings and the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as the new cost basis.

 

36

The Company classifies its

We classify our securities among three categories: Held-to-maturity,held-to-maturity, trading, and available-for-sale. The Company’sOur securities at September 30, 20162018 and 20152017 are all classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices. Gains or losses on the sale of securities are calculated based on the average cost method and are accounted for on a trade date basis. UnrealizedNet unrealized holding gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized. The change in net unrealized holding gains (losses) is reflected as comprehensive income (loss).

 

Revenue Recognition and Estimates

Rental revenue from tenants with leases having scheduled rental increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Tenant recoveries related to the reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as the Company is generally the primary obligor and, with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, has discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the associated credit risk. These occupancy charges are recognized as earned. In addition, an estimate is made with respect to whether a provision for allowance for doubtful tenant and other receivables is necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management’s estimate of the amounts of the recorded tenant and other receivables at the balance sheet date that will not be realized from cash receipts in subsequent periods. If cash receipts in subsequent periods vary from our estimates, or if the Company’s tenants’ financial condition deteriorates as a result of operating difficulties, additional changes to the allowance may be required. The Company did not have an allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2016 or 2015.

37

Lease Termination Income

Lease Termination Income is recognized in operating revenues when there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration is probable of collection. Lease termination amounts are paid by tenants who want to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual term of the lease by agreement with the Company.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement with its tenant, Norton McNaughton of Squire, Inc. (Norton), whereby the Company received a lease termination fee of $238,625 in December 2014, terminating the lease effective January 31, 2015. Prior to the lease termination, Norton leased the Company’s 302,400 square foot building located in its Hanahan (Charleston), SC location through April 29, 2015 at an annualized rent of approximately $1,389,000, or $4.54 per square foot. Additionally, prior to the lease termination, Norton sub-leased the Company’s space to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). In conjunction with the lease termination, the Company simultaneously entered into a lease agreement for four years and three months with SAIC from February 1, 2015 through April 30, 2019 at an initial annualized rent of approximately $1,406,000, or $4.65 per square foot, with 2% increases each year.

Lease Termination Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 consisted of $1,182,890 from the Company’s former tenant at its 83,000 square foot building located in Roanoke, VA. Lease Termination Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 consisted of $113,784 from the Company’s former tenant at its 388,671 square foot building located in St. Joseph, MO and $576,946 from the Company’s former tenant at its 160,000 square foot building located in Monroe, NC. Two of the properties associated with these lease termination fees are currently being leased to new tenants and the remaining property was subsequently leased to a new tenant then sold to that tenant. The Company is currently leasing its property located in St. Joseph, MO to two tenants, one tenant through September 30, 2017 and one tenant through February 28, 2018. The Company was leasing its building in Monroe, NC to a single tenant through September 18, 2015, at which time the Company sold the property to the tenant realizing a gain of approximately $5,021,000. In addition, as further described below, the Company is currently leasing its 83,000 square foot building in Roanoke, VA to a single tenant through January 31, 2025.

Of the Company’s ninety-nine properties, only three leases, representing 1.3% of the Company’s gross leasable area, contain an early termination provision, which are as follows: the Company’s lease with its tenant at its 26,340 square foot location in Ridgeland (Jackson), MS, the Company’s lease with its tenant at its 83,000 square foot location in Roanoke, VA and the Company’s lease with its tenant at its 102,135 square foot location in O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO.

Results of Operations

Occupancy and Rent per Occupied Square Foot

The Company’s weighted-average lease expiration was 7.4 and 7.2 years as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and its average annualized rent per occupied square foot as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $5.72 and $5.48, respectively. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s occupancy was 99.6% and 97.7%, respectively.

All improved properties were 100% occupied at September 30, 2016 except for one property consisting of a 59,425 square feet building situated on 4.78 acres located in White Bear Lake, MN. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building for $4,272,000 which increased our occupancy rate to 100.0%.

38

Fiscal 2016 renewals

Approximately 2% of the Company’s gross leasable area, consisting of three leases totaling 325,656 square feet, was scheduled to expire during fiscal 2016. The Company has renewed all three leases, resulting in a 100% tenant retention rate for fiscal 2016. The Company’s tenant retention rate in fiscal 2015 was also 100%. For two of the three leases that were scheduled to expire during fiscal 2016, the Company did not incur any tenant improvement costs or any leasing costs. For the other lease renewal, the Company incurred or expects to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $210,000 and leasing costs of approximately $133,000. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the three leases which were renewed and includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged over the renewal term.

Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S.
GAAP
Straight-
Line
Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash
Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S
GAAP
Straight-
Line
Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash
Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commissions Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Monaca, PA Datatel Resources  80,856  $2.87  $2.87  11/30/15 $3.00  $3.00  11/30/17  2.0  $-0-  $-0- 
Granite City, IL Anheuser- Busch, Inc.  184,800   4.16   4.32  5/31/16  4.36   4.10  11/30/21  5.5   0.21   0.13 
Richmond, VA United Technologies  60,000   4.99   5.24  5/31/16  5.33   5.24  11/30/18  2.5   -0-   -0- 
  Total  325,656                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $3.99  $4.13    $4.20  $4.04     4.1  $0.16  $0.10 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.

The three lease renewals resulted in a weighted average term of 4.1 years and a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $4.20 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is $4.04. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $3.99 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $4.13 per square foot, representing an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 5.3% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 2.2% on a cash basis.

During September 2015, the Company entered into a 5.25 year lease agreement for its previously vacant 148,000 square foot building located in Fayetteville, NC through February 28, 2021. The lease commenced December 1, 2015 and is with Victory Packaging, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, a publicly-owned company. The initial annual rent of $469,160, representing $3.17 per square foot, commenced on March 1, 2016 with 2.5% annual increases thereafter.

During October 2015, the Company entered into a 5.25 year lease agreement for its previously vacant 106,507 square foot building located in Winston-Salem, NC through March 31, 2021. The lease is with Style Crest, Inc. and commenced on January 1, 2016. Initial annual rent of $356,798, representing $3.35 per square foot, commenced on April 1, 2016 with 3.0% annual increases thereafter.

39

Fiscal 2017 renewals

In fiscal 2017, approximately 10% of our gross leasable area, representing thirteen leases totaling 1,539,526 square feet, is set to expire. As of the date of this Annual Report, five of the thirteen leases have renewed. One of the five leases, (which is with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for a property located in Ft. Myers, FL), has renewed for only eight months because the tenant plans to move its operations from our 87,500 square foot facility to a newly constructed facility, which is also located in Ft. Myers, FL. Once the construction is complete, the Company is under contract to purchase this new facility, consisting of approximately 213,500 square feet, subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements. In addition, once the construction is complete, this brand new facility will be leased for 10 years. Excluding the eight month lease renewal at the Ft. Myers, FL location, the four leases that have renewed thus far represent 500,722 square feet, or 33% of the expiring square footage, and have a weighted average lease term of 8.0 years.

The Company has incurred or expects to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $1,928,000 and leasing costs of approximately $587,000 in connection with four of the five lease renewals. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the five leases which were renewed and includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged over the renewal term.

Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S.
GAAP
Straight-
Line
 Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash
Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S
GAAP
Straight-
Line
Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash
Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commissions Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Ft. Myers, FL FedEx Ground  87,500  $4.95  $4.95  10/31/16 $4.95  $4.95  6/30/17  0.7  $0.00  $0.00 
                                       
Elgin, IL Joseph T. Ryerson  89,052  $5.68  $5.68  1/31/17 $5.68  $5.68  1/31/20  3.0  $0.17  $0.17 
Newington, CT Kellogg Sales Co.  54,812  $6.00  $6.00  2/28/17 $6.00  $6.00  2/29/20  3.0  $0.30  $0.24 
Schaumburg, IL FedEx Express  73,500  $6.88  $7.00  3/31/17 $6.50  $6.50  3/31/27  10.0  $0.24  $0.13 
Tolleson, AZ Western Container  283,358  $4.33  $4.59  4/30/17 $4.78  $4.33  4/30/27  10.0  $0.58  $0.14 
  Total (2)  500,722                                 
                                       
Weighted Average (2)       $5.13  $5.29    $5.33  $5.07     8.0  $0.48  $0.15 
                                       

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
(2)Total and Weighted Average amounts exclude the Ft. Myers, FL property.

Excluding the eight-month lease renewal at the Ft. Myers, FL location, the remaining four lease renewals results in a weighted average term of 8.0 years and a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $5.33 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is $5.07. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $5.13 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.29 per square foot, representing an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 3.9% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 4.2% on a cash basis. The eight remaining leases that are set to expire during fiscal 2017 are under discussion.

Acquisitions and Expansions During Fiscal 2016

Acquisitions

On November 13, 2015, the Company purchased a newly constructed 330,717 square foot industrial building located in Concord, NC, which is in the Charlotte MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for ten years through July 2025. The purchase price was $31,975,897. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $20,780,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.87%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,078,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

40

On December 2, 2015, the Company purchased a newly constructed 175,315 square foot industrial building located in Covington, LA, which is in the New Orleans MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for ten years through June 2025. The purchase price was $18,410,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $12,890,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.08%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,258,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

On March 8, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 125,860 square foot industrial building located in Imperial, PA, which is in the Pittsburgh MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to General Electric Company (GE) for ten years through December 2025. The purchase price was $20,032,864. The Company obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $13,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.63%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,311,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $82,864 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On April 8, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 210,445 square foot industrial building located in Burlington, WA, which is in the Seattle/Everett MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen years through August 2030. The purchase price was $30,662,080. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $20,221,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.67%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,962,000.In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $451,400 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On June 9, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 225,362 square foot industrial building located in Colorado Springs, CO. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for ten years through January 2026. The purchase price was $28,845,500. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $18,730,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.90%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,832,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $345,500 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On June 30, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 137,500 square foot industrial building located in Louisville, KY. The building is 100% net-leased to Challenger Lifts, Inc., a subsidiary of Snap-on Incorporated (“Snap-on”), for ten years through June 2026. The lease is guaranteed by Snap-on. The purchase price was $11,304,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $7,350,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.74%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $835,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

On August 19, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 310,922 square foot industrial building located in Davenport, FL, which is in the Orlando MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen years through April 2031. The purchase price was $37,780,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $26,400,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.89%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,604,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

On August 26, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 313,763 square foot industrial building located in Olathe, KS, which is in the Kansas City MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen years through May 2031. The purchase price was $31,737,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $22,215,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.96%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,196,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

41

Expansions

On July 29, 2016, a 246,434 square foot expansion of a building leased to Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation (“Milwaukee Tool”) located in Olive Branch, MS, which is located in the Memphis, TN MSA, was completed for a cost of approximately $9,785,000. This resulted in a new 12 year lease which extended the original lease expiration date from April 2023 through July 2028 and increased the building size from 615,455 to 861,889 square feet. In addition, the expansion resulted in an initial increase in annual rent effective on the date of completion of approximately $847,000 from approximately $1,943,000, or $3.16 per square foot, to approximately $2,790,000, or $3.24 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will increase each year by 1.5% resulting in an annualized rent over the new twelve year period of approximately $3,020,000, or $3.50 per square foot. In September 2016, in connection with the expansion, the Company refinanced its prior 3.76% interest rate mortgage with its existing lender of this property. At the time of the refinancing, the prior amortizing loan was approximately $13,158,000 and was set to mature in January 2023. The new loan is a 12 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $25,000,000 and will mature in October 2028. The interest rate of the new loan remained the same as the prior loan at a fixed interest rate of 3.76%.

On August 1, 2016, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Tampa, FL was completed for a cost of approximately $1,303,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from June 2024 through July 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $131,000 from approximately $1,493,000, or $8.74 per square foot to approximately $1,624,000, or $9.51 per square foot.

On August 1, 2016, a 14,941 square foot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Huntsville, AL was completed for a cost of approximately $1,925,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from August 2022 through July 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $193,000 from approximately $412,000, or $5.59 per square foot, to approximately $605,000 or $6.82 per square foot.

Comparison of Year Ended September 30, 2016 to Year Ended September 30, 2015

The following tables summarize the Company’s rental revenue, reimbursement revenue, real estate taxes, operating expenses, and depreciation expense by category. For the purposes of the following discussion, same properties are properties owned as of October 1, 2014 that have not been subsequently expanded or sold.

Acquired properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to September 30, 2014. Eighteen properties were acquired during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015. Acquired properties include the properties located in Lindale (Tyler), TX; Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL; Rockford, IL; Kansas City, MO; Frankfort (Lexington), KY; Jacksonville, FL; Monroe (Cincinnati), OH; Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN; Fort Worth (Dallas), TX and Cincinnati, OH (all acquired in fiscal 2015) and Concord (Charlotte), NC; Covington (New Orleans), LA; Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA; Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA; Colorado Springs, CO; Louisville, KY; Davenport (Orlando), FL and Olathe (Kansas City), KS (all acquired in fiscal 2016).

Seven property expansions were completed during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015. Expanded properties include the properties located in El Paso, TX; Huntsville, AL; Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA (NF&M); Oklahoma City, OK; Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS; Tampa, FL (FedEx Ground); and Waco, TX.

Sold property consists of one property located in Monroe, NC that was sold on September 18, 2015.

42

As of September 30, 2016 and 2015, the occupancy rates of the Company’s total property portfolio were 99.6% and 97.7%, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building for $4,272,000 which increased our occupancy rate to 100.0%.

Rental Revenues 2016  2015  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $52,789,077  $51,436,618  $1,352,459   3%
Acquired Properties  19,930,994   7,702,716   12,228,278   159%
Expanded Properties  8,872,358   7,378,811   1,493,547   20%
Sold Property  -0-   541,240   (541,240)  (100)%
Total $81,592,429  $67,059,385  $14,533,044   22%

The increase in rental revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties and expanded properties. Rental revenue from same properties increased due to the increase in same properties occupancy which increased 280 basis points from 96.6% as of September 30, 2015 to 99.4% as of September 30, 2016. In addition, the rental revenue from same properties increased due to an increase in rental rates for the renewed leases as described in the lease renewals and extensions table during fiscal 2016.

Reimbursement Revenues 2016  2015  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $9,809,086  $8,432,694  $1,376,392   16%
Acquired Properties  1,860,929   419,056   1,441,873   344%
Expanded Properties  1,653,666   1,834,352   (180,686)  (10)%
Sold Property  -0-   30,010   (30,010)  (100)%
Total $13,323,681  $10,716,112  $2,607,569   24%

Our single tenant properties are subject to net leases which require the tenants to absorb the real estate taxes, insurance and the majority of the repairs and maintenance. As such, the Company is reimbursed by the tenants for these expenses. Therefore, the total increase in reimbursement revenues is partially offset by the increase in real estate taxes, increase in insurance expense and increase in operating expenses. In addition, the increase in reimbursement revenues for same properties is partially due to the increase in same properties occupancy which enabled us to be reimbursed by our tenants for these expenses on properties that were previously vacant. Same properties occupancy increased 280 basis points from 96.6% as of September 30, 2015 to 99.4% as of September 30, 2016. The increase in reimbursement revenues is mainly due to increases in real estate taxes, insurance expenses and operating expenses from the newly acquired properties.

Real Estate Taxes 2016  2015  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $7,785,127  $6,756,066  $1,029,061   15%
Acquired Properties  1,302,240   203,630   1,098,610   540%
Expanded Properties  1,368,034   1,328,715   39,319   3%
Sold Property  -0-   73,724   (73,724)  (100)%
Total $10,455,401  $8,362,135  $2,093,266   25%

The increase in real estate taxes is mainly due to the newly acquired properties as well as increased assessment values on expanded properties.

Operating Expenses 2016  2015  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $3,180,529  $3,410,422  $(229,893)  (7)%
Acquired Properties  656,576   265,964   390,612   147%
Expanded Properties  436,794   418,517   18,277   4%
Sold Property  -0-   32,981   (32,981)  (100)%
Total $4,273,899  $4,127,884  $146,015   4%

43

The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to the newly acquired properties.

Net Operating Income (“NOI”) 2016  2015  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $51,632,507  $49,702,824  $1,929,683   4%
Acquired Properties  19,833,107   7,652,178   12,180,929   159%
Expanded Properties  8,721,196   7,465,931   1,255,265   17%
Sold Property  -0-   464,545   (464,545)  (100)%
Total $80,186,810  $65,285,478  $14,901,332   23%

The increase in NOI is mainly due to the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.

Depreciation 2016  2015  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $15,404,749  $15,012,514  $392,235   3%
Acquired Properties  6,338,685   2,554,254   3,784,431   148%
Expanded Properties  2,311,588   2,007,934   303,654   15%
Sold Property  -0-   130,618   (130,618)  (100)%
Total $24,055,022  $19,705,320  $4,349,702   22%

The increase in depreciation expense is mainly due to the newly acquired properties. Depreciation expense from same properties and expanded properties increased mainly due to additional tenant improvements being depreciated within fiscal 2016.

Interest Expense 2016  2015  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $10,928,101  $12,654,443  $(1,726,342)  (14)%
Acquired Properties  6,658,906   2,619,581   4,039,325   154%
Expanded Properties  1,618,910   1,753,903   (134,993)  (8)%
Sold Property  -0-   71,287   (71,287)  (100)%
Loans Payable  2,630,894   1,458,936   1,171,958   80%
Total $21,836,811  $18,558,150  $3,278,661   18%

The increase in interest expense is mainly due to the acquisition of new properties. Interest expense for same properties decreased mainly due to the decrease in the outstanding balances of the mortgages and the reduction in the weighted average interest rate. The reduction in the outstanding mortgages balance is due to the payoff of four loans during fiscal 2016 totaling $14,739,654 and regularly scheduled principal amortization payments made during fiscal 2016. The weighted average interest rate on the Company’s fixed rate debt as of September 30, 2016 was 4.48% as compared to 4.85% as of September 30, 2015. Loans payable interest expense increased due to the higher weighted average Loans Payable balance maintained during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015.

Acquisition Costs

Acquisition costs that were expensed in the Consolidated Statement of Income decreased $815,647, or 53% during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015. Eight properties totaling approximately $210,747,000 were acquired during fiscal 2016 as compared to ten properties totaling approximately $191,985,000 that were acquired during fiscal 2015. The decrease in Acquisition Costs during fiscal 2016 was primarily due to a broker fee of approximately $373,600 incurred for the purchase of one acquisition acquired during fiscal 2015 and also due to the higher number of properties acquired during fiscal 2015 as compared to the number of properties purchased during fiscal 2016.

44

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $1,630,196, or 26%, during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015. The increase in fiscal 2016 was partially due to a one-time $400,000 cash signing bonus granted to the President and Chief Executive Officer in accordance with his amended employment agreement during fiscal 2016 and due to a one-time $100,000 severance payment made to a former employee during fiscal 2016. Additionally, during fiscal 2016, the Founder and Chairman of the Board was granted a discretionary award of 40,000 shares of restricted stock which will vest in equal annual installments over the next five years and has a grant date fair value of $13.64 per share, for a total grant date fair value of $545,600. Since the Founder and Chairman of the Board is of retirement age, the entire fair value of the grant was fully expensed at grant date. Furthermore, the amended employment agreements for the Founder and Chairman of the Board, as well as for the President and Chief Executive Officer, each includes certain performance goals that, once met, entitle them to receive annual cash bonuses. Certain levels of each performance goal were met during fiscal 2016, resulting in $345,000 of bonuses being accrued and expensed as of September 30, 2016. The remaining increase was primarily due to an increase in all employees’ wage rates. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of gross revenue, (which includes Rental Revenue, Reimbursement Revenue and Dividend and Interest Income), remains in-line, at 8% for fiscal years 2016 and 2015. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of undepreciated assets, (which is the Company’s total assets excluding accumulated depreciation), remains in-line, at 58 basis points and 61 basis points for the fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Amortization of Financing Costs

Amortization of financing costs decreased $169,778, or 13%, during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015. During fiscal 2016, unamortized deferred loan costs were written off totaling $167,531 of which $160,124 was associated with one loan that was refinanced and $7,407 was associated with two loans that were paid off prior to maturity. This compares with unamortized deferred loan costs that were written off during fiscal 2015 totaling $479,674 of which $152,050 was associated with three loans that were repaid prior to maturity and $327,624 was associated with the repayment of the former line of credit facility prior to its maturity. The decrease in deferred loan costs written off in fiscal 2016 was partially offset by the increase in normal amortization expensed during fiscal 2016.

Dividend and Interest Income

Dividend and Interest Income increased $1,892,525, or 51%, during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015. This is mainly due to the higher average carrying value of the REIT securities portfolio during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 compared to during the fiscal year September 30, 2015. The REIT securities portfolio weighted average yield for fiscal 2016 was approximately 8.0% as compared to 7.6% for fiscal 2015.

Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment

Gain on sale of real estate investment for fiscal 2015 represents the gain recognized from the sale of the Company’s 160,000 square foot industrial building located in Monroe, NC for $9,000,000, with net sale proceeds to the Company of approximately $8,847,000. The property was sold to Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company, the tenant that was leasing the property from the Company through July 31, 2017 at an annual rental rate of approximately $571,000. The Company purchased this property in 2001 and it had a historic cost basis of approximately $5,557,000 and a net book value (net of accumulated depreciation) of approximately $3,825,000. Under U.S. GAAP, the sale resulted in a realized gain of $5,021,242, representing a 131% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a realized gain on a historic cost of approximately $3,290,000, representing a 59% gain over the Company’s historic cost basis. There were no sales of real estate investments during fiscal 2016.

45

Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net

Realized gain on sales of securities transactions, net consisted of the following:

  2016  2015 
       
Gross realized gains $4,403,724  $880,424 
Gross realized losses  (5,125)  (74,911)
Total Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net $4,398,599  $805,513 

The Company had an accumulated net unrealized gain on its securities portfolio of $12,942,267 as of September 30, 2016.

Comparison of Year Ended September 30, 2015 to Year Ended September 30, 2014

The following tables summarize the Company’s rental revenue, reimbursement revenue, real estate taxes, operating expenses, and depreciation expense by category. For the purposes of the following discussion, same properties are properties owned as of October 1, 2013 that have not been subsequently expanded or sold.

Acquired properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to September 30, 2013. Sixteen properties were acquired during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014. Acquired properties include the properties located in Buckner (Louisville), KY; Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS; Spring (Houston), TX; Altoona, PA; Tulsa, OK and Indianapolis, IN, (all acquired in fiscal 2014) and Lindale (Tyler), TX; Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL; Rockford, IL; Kansas City, MO; Frankfort (Lexington), KY; Jacksonville, FL; Monroe (Cincinnati), OH; Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN; Fort Worth (Dallas), TX and Cincinnati, OH (all acquired in fiscal 2015).

Nine property expansions were completed during fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014. Expanded properties include the properties located in Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC; Richfield (Cleveland), OH; El Paso, TX; Tampa, FL (FedEx Ground); Cocoa, FL, Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA (NF&M); Oklahoma City, OK and Waco, TX. In addition, the property located in Spring (Houston), TX was expanded, however its activity is included in Acquired properties.

Sold property consists of one property located in Monroe, NC that was sold on September 18, 2015.

As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the occupancy rates of the Company’s total property portfolio were 97.7% and 95.9%, respectively.

Rental Revenues 2015  2014  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $42,414,601  $42,109,581  $305,020   1%
Acquired Properties  15,118,514   5,542,626   9,575,888   173%
Expanded Properties  8,985,030   7,766,625   1,218,405   16%
Sold Property  541,240   93,333   447,907   480%
Total $67,059,385  $55,512,165  $11,547,220   21%

46

The increase in rental revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties and expanded properties. Rental revenue from same properties increased due to the increase in same properties occupancy which increased 160 basis points from 94.5% as of September 30, 2014 to 96.1% as of September 30, 2015. In addition, the rental revenue from same properties increased due to an increase in rental rates for the renewed leases as described in the lease renewals and extensions table during fiscal 2015. The rental revenue from the sold property increased because the property was vacant prior to August 2014.

Reimbursement Revenues 2015  2014  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $7,950,687  $7,366,341  $584,346   8%
Acquired Properties  960,793   183,274   777,519   424%
Expanded Properties  1,774,622   1,607,230   167,392   10%
Sold Property  30,010   3,331   26,679   801%
Total $10,716,112  $9,160,176  $1,555,936   17%

Our single tenant properties are subject to net leases which require the tenants to absorb the real estate taxes, insurance and the majority of the repairs and maintenance. As such, the Company is reimbursed by the tenants for these expenses. Therefore, the total increase in reimbursement revenues is partially offset by the increase in real estate taxes, increase in insurance expense and increase in operating expenses. In addition, the increase in reimbursement revenues for same properties is partially due to the increase in same properties occupancy which enabled us to be reimbursed by our tenants for these expenses on properties that were previously vacant. Same properties occupancy increased 160 basis points from 94.5% as of September 30, 2014 to 96.1% as of September 30, 2015. The increase in reimbursement revenues is mainly due to increases in real estate taxes, insurance expenses and operating expenses from the newly acquired properties.

Real Estate Taxes 2015  2014  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $6,180,550  $6,164,615  $15,935   0%
Acquired Properties  667,355   99,470   567,885   571%
Expanded Properties  1,440,506   1,263,916   176,590   14%
Sold Property  73,724   77,610   (3,886)  (5)%
Total $8,362,135  $7,605,611  $756,524   10%

The increase in real estate taxes is mainly due to the newly acquired properties as well as increased assessment values on expanded properties.

Operating Expenses 2015  2014  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $3,159,415  $3,027,025  $132,390   4%
Acquired Properties  426,706   123,855   302,851   245%
Expanded Properties  508,782   469,243   39,539   8%
Sold Property  32,981   91,745   (58,764)  (64)%
Total $4,127,884  $3,711,868  $416,016   11%

The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to the newly acquired properties.

Net Operating Income (“NOI”) 2015  2014  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $41,025,323  $40,284,282  $741,041   2%
Acquired Properties  14,985,246   5,502,575   9,482,671   172%
Expanded Properties  8,810,364   7,640,696   1,169,668   15%
Sold Property  464,545   (72,691)  537,236   (739)%
Total $65,285,478  $53,354,862  $11,930,616   22%

47

The increase in NOI is mainly due to the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.

Depreciation 2015  2014  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $12,467,619  $12,226,797  $240,822   2%
Acquired Properties  4,823,387   1,563,716   3,259,671   208%
Expanded Properties  2,283,696   1,988,244   295,452   15%
Sold Property  130,618   130,012   606   0%
Total $19,705,320  $15,908,769  $3,796,551   24%

The increase in depreciation expense is mainly due to the newly acquired properties. Depreciation expense from same properties and expanded properties increased mainly due to additional tenant improvements being depreciated within fiscal 2015.

Interest Expense 2015  2014  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $10,183,806  $11,398,877  $(1,215,071)  (11)%
Acquired Properties  4,985,596   1,614,254   3,371,342   209%
Expanded Properties  1,858,525   2,009,346   (150,821)  (8)%
Sold Property  71,287   65,876   5,411   8%
Loans Payable  1,458,936   1,016,325   442,611   44%
Total $18,558,150  $16,104,678  $2,453,472   15%

The increase in interest expense is mainly due to the acquisition of new properties. Interest expense for same properties decreased mainly due to the decrease in the outstanding balances of the mortgages and the reduction in the weighted average interest rate. The reduction in the outstanding mortgages balance is due to the payoff of five loans during fiscal 2015 totaling $11,176,087 and regularly scheduled principal amortization payments made during fiscal 2015. The weighted average interest rate on the Company’s fixed rate debt as of September 30, 2015 was 4.85% as compared to 5.24% as of September 30, 2014. Loans payable interest expense increased due to the higher weighted average Loans Payable balance maintained during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014.

Acquisition Costs

Acquisition costs that were expensed in the Consolidated Statement of Income increased $1,064,208, or 221% during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. The increase is due to the increase in acquisitions during fiscal 2015. Ten properties totaling approximately $191,985,000 were acquired during fiscal 2015 as compared to six properties totaling approximately $97,807,000 that were acquired during fiscal 2014.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $595,991, or 10%, during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. The increase is mainly due to an increase in compensation expense and additional personnel.

Amortization of Financing Costs

Amortization of financing costs increased $560,271, or 77%, during fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. The increase is mainly due to the write off of the unamortized deferred loan costs totaling $479,674, of which $152,050 was associated with three loans that were repaid prior to maturity and $327,624 was associated with the repayment of the former line of credit facility prior to its maturity.

48

Dividend and Interest Income

Dividend and Interest Income for fiscal 2015 was $3,723,867 which is in-line with Dividend and Interest Income of $3,882,597 for fiscal 2014. This is mainly due to the relatively same average carrying value of the REIT securities portfolio during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 compared to during the fiscal year September 30, 2014. The REIT securities portfolio weighted average yield for fiscal 2015 was approximately 7.6% as compared to 7.4% for fiscal 2014.

Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment

Gain on sale of real estate investment for fiscal 2015 represents the gain recognized from the sale of the Company’s 160,000 square foot industrial building located in Monroe, NC for $9,000,000, with net sale proceeds to the Company of approximately $8,847,000. The property was sold to Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company, the tenant that was leasing the property from the Company through July 31, 2017 at an annual rental rate of approximately $571,000. The Company purchased this property in 2001 and it had a historic cost basis of approximately $5,557,000 and a net book value (net of accumulated depreciation) of approximately $3,825,000. Under U.S. GAAP, the sale resulted in a realized gain of $5,021,242, representing a 131% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a realized gain on a historic cost of approximately $3,290,000, representing a 59% gain over the Company’s historic cost basis. There were no sales of real estate investments during fiscal 2014.

Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net

Realized gain on sales of securities transactions, net consisted of the following:

  2015  2014 
       
Gross realized gains $880,424  $2,222,424 
Gross realized losses  (74,911)  (55,658)
Total Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net $805,513  $2,166,766 

The Company had an accumulated net unrealized loss on its securities portfolio of $5,441,603 as of September 30, 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

The following is a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations as of September 30, 2016:

Contractual Obligations Total  Less than one
year
  1-3 years  3-5 years  More than 5
years
 
                
Mortgage Notes Payable $483,748,153  $57,791,871  $91,344,821  $58,064,350  $276,547,111 
Interest on Mortgage Notes Payable  124,269,946   20,485,724   32,655,248   25,349,490   45,779,484 
Loans Payable  80,790,684   4,790,684   -0-   76,000,000   -0- 
Interest on Loans Payable  7,614,201   1,959,801   3,769,600   1,884,800   -0- 
Purchase of Properties  247,472,964   188,825,599   58,647,365   -0-   -0- 
Expansions of Existing Properties  1,002,491   1,002,491   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Retirement Benefits  700,000   50,000   100,000   50,000   500,000 
Total $945,598,439  $274,906,170  $186,517,034  $161,348,640  $322,826,595 

49

Mortgage notes payable represents the principal amounts outstanding by scheduled maturity as of September 30, 2016. Interest is payable on these mortgages at fixed rates ranging from 3.45% to 7.60%, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.48%. As of September 30, 2016, the weighted average loan maturity of the mortgage notes payable is 10.5 years. This compares to a weighted average interest rate of 4.85% as of September 30, 2015 and a weighted average loan maturity of the mortgage notes payable of 9.0 years as of September 30, 2015. The above table does not include a fifteen year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $23,500,000 obtained in connection with the purchase of one property for $35,100,000 subsequent to the fiscal yearend at a fixed interest rate of 4.03%. In addition, the above table does not include commitments the Company has entered into to obtain five mortgage loans totaling $101,204,000 at fixed interest rates ranging from 3.60% to 4.20%, with a weighted average interest rate of 3.83%. Each of these five mortgage loan commitments are in connection with commitments to purchase five properties, currently under construction, totaling approximately $153,726,000. Each of these five mortgages will be a fifteen year, fully-amortizing loan.

Loans Payable represents a $2,284,633 term loan at an annual interest rate of 4.90%, which was paid in full on October 28, 2016, a $2,506,051 term loan at a variable annual interest rate of prime plus 0.75% with a floor of 4.50%, maturing on March 9, 2017, and the draw on our Facility of $76,000,000 as of September 30, 2016. The interest rate on the $2,506,051 term loan was 4.50% as of September 30, 2016.

On September 30, 2016, the Company entered into a first amendment to its existing $130,000,000 Facility to exercise its existing $70,000,000 accordion feature (the Amendment), increasing the Facility to $200,000,000. The Amendment also adds an additional $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $300,000,000, subject to certain conditions. In addition, the amendment extended the maturity date, which was set to mature in August 2019 to now mature in September 2020 and has a one-year extension option, at the option of the Company, subject to certain conditions. Availability under the Facility, through December 31, 2016, is limited to 70% of the value of the borrowing base properties, and is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties thereafter. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a 7.0% capitalization rate to the net operating income generated by the Company’s unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Borrowings under the Facility, up to the first 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties, will, at the Company’s election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140 basis points to 220 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 40 basis points to 120 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company’s borrowings as of September 30, 2016 were less than 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties and based on the Company’s leverage ratio as of September 30, 2016, borrowings under the Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 150 basis points which was at an interest rate of 2.03% as of September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2016, $76,000,000 was drawn down.

The contractual obligation for interest on Loans Payable amount is determined using an interest rate of 4.50% for the $2,506,051 term loan, 4.90% for the $2,284,633 term loan and 2.03% on the $76,000,000 unsecured line of credit facility. In addition, the above table does not include the Company’s obligation under its available margin loan, for which no amount was outstanding as of September 30, 2016.

Purchase of properties represents commitments the Company has entered into to purchase nine industrial properties totaling approximately 2,438,000 square feet. One acquisition amounting to $35,100,000 and totaling approximately 339,000 square feet was completed subsequent to the fiscal yearend. The Company expects to close on the remaining eight properties amounting to approximately $212,373,000 and totaling approximately 2,099,000 square feet during the remainder of fiscal 2017 and 2018, subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements.

Expansions of existing properties represents the remaining costs expected to be incurred as of September 30, 2016 in connection with a 50,741 square foot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Edinburg, TX that was substantially completed on October 1, 2016 for a total project cost of approximately $4,988,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 through September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $5.27 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000, or $6.68 per square foot.

50

Retirement Benefits of $700,000 represent the total future amount to be paid, on an undiscounted basis, relating to one executive officer, Mr. Eugene W. Landy, the Founder and Chairman of the Board of the Company. These benefits are based upon a specific employment agreement. The agreement does not require the Company to separately fund the obligation and therefore will be paid from the general assets of the Company. The Company has accrued these benefits on a present value basis over the term of the employment agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company operates as a real estate investment trust deriving its income primarily from real estate rental operations. The Company’s shareholders’ equity increased from $446,010,640 as of September 30, 2015 to $597,858,098 as of September 30, 2016, due the issuance of 6,515,750 shares of common stock in the amount of $72,175,797 through the DRIP, stock compensation expense of $926,465, exercise of stock options consisting of 245,000 shares for total proceeds of $1,883,300, net income attributable to common shareholders of $20,531,888, the issuance of 5,400,000 shares issued in connection with an underwritten public offering of its 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, net of offering costs in the amount of $130,543,422 and net change in unrealized gain on investments of $18,383,870. The increases were partially offset by payments of cash distributions paid to common shareholders of $42,034,183 and by the reclassification from shareholders’ equity to a liability of the Company’s 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock that was called for redemption and was redeemed on October 14, 2016 in the amount, net of redemption costs, of $50,563,101. See further discussion below.

The Company’s ability to generate cash adequate to meet its needs is dependent primarily on income from its real estate investments and its securities portfolio, the sale of real estate investments and securities, refinancing of mortgage debt, leveraging of real estate investments, availability of bank borrowings, proceeds from the DRIP, proceeds from public offerings and private placements, and access to the capital markets. Purchases of new properties, payments of expenses related to real estate operations, capital improvement programs, debt service, general and administrative expenses, and distribution requirements place demands on the Company’s liquidity.

The Company intends to operate its properties from the cash flows generated by the properties. However, the Company’s expenses are affected by various factors, including inflation. Increases in operating expenses are predominantly born by the tenant. To the extent that these increases cannot be passed on through rent reimbursements, these increases will reduce the amount of available cash flow which can adversely affect the market value of the property.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company had $95,749,508 in cash and cash equivalents and $73,604,894 in marketable securities subject to term loans of $4,790,684. In addition, as of September 30, 2016, the Company also had $124,000,000 available on its Facility. The Facility provides for up to $200,000,000 in available borrowings with a $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $300,000,000, subject to certain conditions.

The Company has been raising equity capital through its DRIP, registered direct placements and the public sale of common and preferred stock and investing in net-leased industrial properties. The Company believes that funds generated from operations, the DRIP, and bank borrowings, together with the ability to finance and refinance its properties, will provide sufficient funds to adequately meet its obligations over the next few years.

51

As of September 30, 2016, the Company owned ninety-nine properties of which sixty-four are subject to mortgages. On August 27, 2015, the Company replaced its prior $60,000,000 unsecured revolving line of credit with the Facility. The Facility is syndicated with three banks led by BMO Capital Markets (“BMO”), as sole lead arranger, sole book runner, and Bank of Montreal as administrative agent, and includes JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“J.P. Morgan”) and RBC Capital Markets (“RBC”) as co-syndication agents. The Facility provided for up to $130,000,000 in available borrowings with a $70,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $200,000,000, subject to certain conditions. The Facility was set to mature in August 2019 and had a one-year extension option, at the option of the Company. On September 30, 2016, the Company entered the Amendment pursuant to which the Company exercised the $70,000,000 accordion feature under the Facility, bringing the maximum availability under the Facility to $200,000,000, and amended the Facility to provide an additional $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $300,000,000, subject to certain conditions, including, without limitation, obtaining commitments from additional lenders. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity date of the Facility from August 27, 2019 to September 30, 2020, with a one-year extension option, at the option of the Company, subject to certain conditions. Availability under the Facility, through December 31, 2016, is limited to 70% of the value of the borrowing base properties, and is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties thereafter. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a 7.0% capitalization rate to the net operating income generated by the Company’s unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Borrowings under the Facility, up to the first 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties, will, at the Company’s election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140 basis points to 220 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 40 basis points to 120 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company’s borrowings as of September 30, 2016 were less than 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties, and based on the Company’s leverage ratio as of September 30, 2016, borrowings under the Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 150 basis points which was at an interest rate of 2.03% as of September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2016, $76,000,000 was drawn down under the Facility.

In addition, as of September 30, 2016, the Company had Loans Payable of $4,790,684, which consisted of a $2,506,051 term loan at a variable annual interest rate of prime plus 0.75% with a floor of 4.50%, maturing on March 9, 2017 which is secured by 500,000 shares of UMH common stock from The Bank of Princeton and a $2,284,633 term loan at an annual interest rate of 4.90% which is secured by 200,000 shares UMH 8.25% Series A preferred stock from Two River Community Bank. The Two River Community Bank term loan was paid in full on October 28, 2016.

The Company also uses margin loans from time to time for purchasing securities, for temporary funding of acquisitions, and for working capital purposes. The interest rate charged on the margin loans is the bank’s margin rate and was 2.00% as of September 30, 2016 and 2015. The margin loans are due on demand and are collateralized by the Company’s securities portfolio. The Company must maintain a coverage ratio of approximately 50%. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no amounts outstanding under the margin loans.

The Company’s focus is on real estate investments. The Company has historically financed purchases of real estate primarily through mortgages.

During fiscal 2016, the Company purchased eight industrial properties totaling approximately 1,830,000 square feet with net-leased terms ranging from ten to fifteen years, resulting in a weighted average lease maturity of 12.3 years. Approximately 1,567,000 square feet, or 86%, is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., a subsidiary of FedEx Corporation (FDX). The purchase price for the eight properties was approximately $210,747,000 and they are located in Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Washington. These eight properties generate annualized rental income over the life of their leases of approximately $14,076,000. The funds for these eight acquisitions were provided by eight property level mortgage loans totaling $141,586,000, draws the Facility and cash on hand. The eight mortgages have a weighted average interest rate of 3.85% and a weighted average maturity of 14.9 years.

52

Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 17, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 338,584 square foot industrial building located in Hamburg, NY, which is in the Buffalo MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen years through March 2031. The purchase price was $35,100,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $23,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.03%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,308,000.

In addition, subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2016, a 50,741 square foot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Edinburg, TX was substantially completed for a cost of approximately $4,988,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 through September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $5.27 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000, or $6.68 per square foot.

On October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building (which increased our occupancy rate from 99.6% to 100.0%) consisting of a 59,425 square foot industrial building situated on 4.78 acres located in White Bear Lake, MN for approximately $4,272,000, which is the Company’s approximate U.S. GAAP net book carrying value.

The industrial properties purchased, expanded and sold during fiscal 2017 to date, increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 16,340,000 and increased our occupancy rate to 100.0%.

In addition to the property purchased subsequent to the fiscal yearend, we have entered into agreements to purchase eight new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina totaling approximately 2,099,000 square feet, each with net-leased terms ranging between ten to fifteen years with a weighted average lease maturity of 13.3 years. Approximately 1,267,000 square feet, or 60%, is leased to FDX and its subsidiaries. The purchase price for the eight properties is approximately $212,373,000. Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing these eight transactions during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018. In connection with five of the eight properties, the Company has entered into commitments to obtain five mortgages totaling $101,204,000 at fixed rates ranging from 3.60% to 4.20%, with a weighted average interest rate of 3.83%. Each of these mortgages will be a fifteen year, fully-amortizing loan. The Company may make additional acquisitions in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 and the funds for these acquisitions may come from mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, sale of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP), private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities. To the extent that funds or appropriate properties are not available, fewer acquisitions will be made.

The Company also invests in marketable securities of other REITs as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available, for liquidity, and for additional income. The Company generally limits its marketable securities investments to no more than approximately 10% of its undepreciated assets (which is the Company’s total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). The Company from time to time may purchase these securities on margin when there is an adequate yield spread. During fiscal 2016, the Company’s securities portfolio increased $19,063,657, due to the increase in the net unrealized gain of $18,383,870 and purchases of $19,055,956 offset by the sale of securities with a cost of $18,376,169. The Company recognized gains on sales of securities of $4,398,599 in addition to earning Dividend and Interest Income of $5,616,392 during fiscal 2016. There was no margin loan balance as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $54,699,500, $38,062,285 and $34,856,285 for fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in cash flows provided from operating activities from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016 and from fiscal 2014 to fiscal 2015 is due to the increased income generated from acquisitions of properties and expanded operations.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $227,845,089, $194,469,735 and $131,809,697 for fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2016 increased as compared to 2015 due mainly to an increase in the purchase of real estate and capital and land site improvements. Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2015 increased as compared to 2014 due mainly to an increase in purchase of real estate.

53

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $256,821,188, $148,006,698 and $105,023,561 for fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Cash flows from financing activities increased in fiscal 2016 as compared to 2015 due mainly to an increase in proceeds from mortgage loans in the amount of $44,412,942 and the proceeds from the issuance of 5,400,000 shares of 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Series C Preferred Stock) with net proceeds of $130,543,422. Cash flows from financing activities increased in fiscal 2015 as compared to 2014 due mainly to an increase in proceeds from mortgage loans in the amount of $59,268,058 and net draws on the line of credit facility of $60,000,000. In addition, the Company paid cash dividends (net of reinvestments), of $33,665,037, $27,032,958 and $21,906,902 for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company had total assets of $1,229,758,028 and liabilities of $631,899,930. The Company’s total debt to total market capitalization as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 was approximately 34% and 39%, respectively. The Company’s net debt (net of cash and cash equivalents) to total market capitalization as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 was approximately 29% and 38%, respectively. The Company’s net debt, less securities (net of cash and cash equivalents and net of securities) to total market capitalization as of September 30, 2016 and 2015 was approximately 25% and 33%, respectively. The Company believes that it has the ability to meet its obligations and to generate funds for new investments.

The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP), in which participants can purchase stock from the Company at a price of approximately 95% of market value. Amounts received in connection with the DRIP, (including dividend reinvestments of $8,369,146, $8,489,169 and $7,624,528 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively), were $72,175,797, $48,404,556 and $38,090,334 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

During fiscal 2016, the Company paid total distributions to holders of common stock of $42,034,183, or $0.64 per common share. Of the dividends paid, $8,369,146 was reinvested pursuant to the terms of the DRIP. On October 1, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 6.7% increase in the Company’s quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.16 per share from $0.15 per share. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.64 per share. The Company has maintained or increased its cash dividend for twenty-five consecutive years. The Company paid the distributions from cash flows from operations. Management anticipates maintaining the annual dividend rate of $0.64 per common share although no assurances can be given since various economic factors may reduce the amount of cash flow available to the Company for common dividends. All decisions with respect to the payment of dividends are made by the Company’s Board of Directors.

During fiscal 2016, the Company paid $8,607,032 in preferred stock dividends and accrued $413,438 of preferred stock dividends.

On September 13, 2016, the Company issued 5,400,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock at an offering price of $25.00 per share in an underwritten public offering. The Company received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses, of approximately $130,543,000. On September 15, 2016, the Company used $45,000,000 of such net proceeds from the offering to reduce the amounts outstanding under its Facility and on October 14, 2016, the Company used $53,493,750 of such net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of the 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of its 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, on October 14, 2016, the Company used $498,540 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, to and including the redemption date of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. The Company intends to use the remaining proceeds to reduce the amounts outstanding under its Facility and to purchase properties and fund expansions of its existing properties in the ordinary course of business and for general corporate purposes.

54

On September 14, 2016, the Company announced that it intended to redeem all 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of its 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. As discussed above, the Company redeemed the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock on October 14, 2016 at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all dividends accrued and unpaid to and including the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.23299 per share. As of September 30, 2016, the outstanding 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock has been reclassified out of stockholder's equity and is reflected as a liability at redemption value and the Company has recognized a deemed dividend of $2,942,149 on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, which represents the difference between redemption value and carrying value net of original deferred issuance costs.

The Company is required to pay cumulative dividends on its 7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock) in the amount of $1.96875 per share per year, which is equivalent to 7.875% of the $25.00 liquidation value per share. As of September 30, 2016, the Company has a total of 2,300,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding, representing an aggregate liquidation preference of $57,500,000.

The Company is required to pay cumulative dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock in the amount of $1.53125 per share per year, which is equivalent to 6.125% of the $25.00 liquidation value per share. As of September 30, 2016, the Company has a total of 5,400,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding, representing an aggregate liquidation preference of $135,000,000.

During the year ended September 30, 2016, stock options to purchase 245,000 shares were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $7.69 per share for total proceeds of $1,883,300.

On an ongoing basis, the Company funds capital expenditures primarily to maintain its properties. These expenditures may also include expansions as requested by tenants, or various tenant improvements on properties which are re-tenanted. The amounts of these expenditures can vary from year to year depending on the age of the properties, tenant negotiations, market conditions and lease turnover.

During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company completed fifteen expansions at thirteen of its locations, consisting of ten building expansions and five parking lot expansions. Two of the parking lot expansions included the purchase of additional land. The ten building expansions resulted in approximately 699,000 additional square feet. Total costs for all fifteen property expansions were approximately $52,474,000 and resulted in total increased annual rent of approximately $5,180,000. Fourteen completed expansions resulted in a new ten year lease extension for each property that was expanded and one completed expansion resulted in a new twelve year lease extension. In addition, subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2016, a 50,741 square foot expansion of a building was completed for a cost of approximately $4,988,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 through September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, to approximately $1,097,000.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

55

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”, which relates to the accounting for employee share-based payments. ASU 2016-09 addresses several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”. ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. These changes becomebecame effective for the Company’sour fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. The Company is currentlymost significant change for us, once ASU 2016-01 was adopted, was the accounting treatment for our investments in marketable securities that are classified as available for sale. The accounting treatment used for our Consolidated Financial Statements through Fiscal 2018, was that our investments in marketable securities, classified as available for sale, were carried at fair value, with net unrealized holding gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized and the processchange in net unrealized holding gains and losses being reflected as comprehensive income (loss). Under ASU 2016-01, effective October 1, 2018, these marketable securities continue to be measured at fair value, however the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses are now recognized through net income. Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2018, unrealized net holding losses of evaluating$24,744,579 were reclassed to beginning retained earnings to recognize the impact of the adoptionunrealized losses previously recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive income” on itsour consolidated financial statements and has not determined the effects of this update on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows and disclosures at this time.balance sheets.

 

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”. ASU 2015-16 eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments. The new guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. ASU 2015-16 is effective for interimRevenue Recognition and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-16 to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.Estimates

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Topic 835): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”. ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related toRental revenue from tenants with leases having scheduled rental increases are recognized on a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update. The amendments in ASU 2015-03 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements”, providing guidance regarding the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance on this matter, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratablystraight-line basis over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardlesslease. Tenant recoveries related to the reimbursement of whether therereal estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are any outstanding borrowings on that line-of-credit arrangement. The Company is currentlyrecognized as revenue in the processperiod the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as we are generally, the primary obligor and, with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, has discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the associated credit risk. These occupancy charges are recognized as earned. In addition, an estimate is made with respect to whether a provision for allowance for doubtful tenant and other receivables is necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management’s estimate of evaluating the impactamounts of the adoptionrecorded tenant and other receivables at the balance sheet date that will not be realized from cash receipts in subsequent periods. If cash receipts in subsequent periods vary from our estimates, or if our tenants’ financial condition deteriorates as a result of ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 willoperating difficulties, additional changes to the allowance may be required. We did not have on the Company’s financial positionan allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2018 or results of operations.2017.

 5637 

Lease Termination Income

Lease Termination Income is recognized in operating revenues when there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration is probable of collection. Lease termination amounts are paid by tenants who want to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual term of the lease agreement with us.

Two leases were set to expire during fiscal 2018 with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) for our 65,067 square foot facility located in Kansas City, MO through July 31, 2018 and our 50,400 square foot facility located in Orangeburg, NY through February 28, 2018. Kellogg informed us that they would not be renewing these leases. On December 18, 2017, we sold our property, located in Kansas City, MO for $4,900,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $4,602,000 and on December 22, 2017, we sold our property, located in Orangeburg, NY for $6,170,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,898,000. The sale of these two properties resulted in a realized gain of approximately $5,388,000, representing a 105% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a realized net gain of approximately $1,804,000, representing a 21% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis. In conjunction with the sale of these two properties, we simultaneously entered into a lease termination agreement for each property whereby we received a termination fee from Kellogg totaling approximately $210,000 which represents a weighted average of 80% of the then remaining rent due under each respective lease.

Only four of our 111 properties have leases that contain an early termination provision. These four properties contain approximately 184,000 total rentable square feet, representing less than 1% of our total rentable square feet. Our leases with early termination provisions are our 26,340 square foot location in Ridgeland (Jackson), MS, our 36,270 square foot location in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA, our 38,833 square foot location in Rockford, IL, and our 83,000 square foot location in Roanoke, VA. Each lease termination provision contains certain requirements that must be met in order to exercise each termination provision. These requirements include: the date termination can be exercised, the time frame that notice must be given by the tenant to us and the termination fee that would be required to be paid by the tenant to us. The total potential termination fee to be paid to us from the four tenants with leases that have a termination provision amounts to approximately $1,694,000.

Results of Operations

Occupancy and Rent per Occupied Square Foot

Our weighted-average lease expiration was 8.1 years and 7.9 years as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and our average annualized rent per occupied square foot as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $6.01 and $5.93, respectively. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, our occupancy was 99.6% and 99.3%, respectively.

All improved properties were 100% occupied, except for one property located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA consisting of 255,658 rentable square feet, of which 68% or 174,802 square feet is occupied, resulting in a 99.6% overall occupancy percentage for our entire portfolio of properties.

Fiscal 2018 Renewals

In fiscal 2018, approximately 8% of our gross leasable area, representing 16 leases totaling 1,546,637 square feet, was set to expire. We have renewed 11 of the 16 leases that were set to expire during fiscal 2018, representing 1,063,824 square feet, or 69% of the expiring square footage. One of the 11 leases, which is with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., for a property located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC, renewed for only four months, until November 30, 2018, because the tenant moved their operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to our newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC and is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. We closed on this new facility on August 15, 2018. Excluding the four month lease renewal at the 91,776 square foot location, the 10 leases that have renewed represent 972,048 square feet, or 63% of the expiring square footage. We have incurred, or we expect to incur, tenant improvement costs of approximately $844,000 and leasing commission costs of approximately $898,000 in connection with these 10 lease renewals. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the 11 leases which were renewed. In addition, the table below includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing commission costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged annually over the renewal term.

38

Property Tenant Square Feet  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (3)  FedEx Ground  91,776  $7.35  $7.35  07/31/18 $7.35  $7.35  11/30/18  0.3  $-0-  $-0- 
                                       
Chattanooga, TN FedEx Express  60,637  $    5.13  $5.13  10/31/17 $5.26  $5.26  10/31/22  5.0  $0.44  $0.10 
Lakeland, FL FedEx Express  32,105   4.83   4.83  11/30/17  4.83   4.83  11/30/27  10.0               0.19             0.10 
Orlando, FL FedEx Express  110,638   5.69   6.02  11/30/17  6.02   6.02  11/30/27  10.0   0.20   0.12 
St. Joseph, MO Altec Industries  126,880   2.75   2.75  02/28/18  2.94   2.87  02/28/23  5.0   -0-   0.13 
Edwardsville, KS Carlisle Tire  179,280   4.23   4.39  05/31/18  4.10   4.15  07/31/23  5.2   0.05   0.16 
Augusta, GA FedEx Ground  59,358   7.64   7.64  06/30/18  8.64   8.64  06/30/21  3.0   -0-   -0- 
O’Fallon, MO Pittsburgh Glass Works  102,135   4.18   4.18  06/30/18  4.37   4.31  06/30/21  3.0   0.08   -0- 
Denver, CO FedEx Ground  69,865   8.08   8.08  07/31/18  8.72   8.72  10/31/25  7.3   -0-   0.17 
Beltsville, MD FedEx Ground  148,881   9.58   9.58  07/31/18  9.77   9.77  07/31/28  10.0   -0-   0.20 
Bedford Heights, OH FedEx Express  82,269   4.96   4.96  08/31/18  5.33   5.33  08/31/28  10.0   0.43   0.11 
  Total (2)  972,048                                 
                                       
Weighted Average (2)       $5.64  $5.71    $5.87  $5.87     6.8  $0.13  $0.14 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
(2)“Total” and “Weighted Average” amounts exclude the short-term renewal of the Hanahan (Charleston), SC property.
(3)Renewed for only four months because the tenant moved its operations from our 91,776 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC to a brand new, build-to-suit, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. We purchased the new facility on August 15, 2018.

Excluding the four-month lease renewal at the Hanahan (Charleston), SC location, the remaining 10 lease renewals result in a weighted average term of 6.8 years and a renewed U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $5.87 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is also $5.87 per square foot. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $5.64 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.71 per square foot, representing an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 4.1% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 2.8% on a cash basis.

As further discussed below and under Fiscal 2018 dispositions, of the five remaining leases originally set to expire during fiscal 2018 that did not renew, three of the properties were sold and one of the properties was re-tenanted. The three properties that were sold represent 12% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018, and one property, representing 14% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018, was re-tenanted for 3 years. The remaining lease that did not renew, expired on December 31, 2017 and represents 5% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018. This tenant leased 80,856 square feet at our 255,658 square foot industrial park located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA. This partially vacant property currently represents our only property with vacancy.

Another remaining lease that was set to expire during fiscal 2018 was leased to Caterpillar Logistics Services, Inc. (Caterpillar) at our 218,120 square foot facility located in Griffin, GA through December 31, 2017. In September 2017, we entered into a three year lease agreement with Rinnai America Corporation through December 31, 2020 for this location. The new lease commenced on January 1, 2018, with initial annual rent of $807,044, representing $3.70 per square foot, with 3.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of $831,000, representing $3.81 per square foot over the life of the lease. This compares to the former U.S. GAAP straight-line and the former cash rent of $5.36 per square foot, resulting in a decrease in the average lease rate of 28.9% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease of 31.0% on a cash basis.

39

Other Fiscal 2018 Leasing Activity

Effective November 1, 2017, we entered into a 10.2 year lease agreement with FBM Gypsum Supply of Illinois, LLC for our 36,270 square foot facility located in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA. The lease agreement provided for two months of free rent, after which, on January 1, 2018, initial annual rent of $159,588, representing $4.40 per square foot commenced, with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of approximately $172,000, representing $4.74 per square foot through the expiration date of the lease, which is December 31, 2027. This new rent compares to the former average rent of $3.56 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former cash rent of $3.88 per square foot, representing an increase in the average lease rate of 33.1% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 13.4% on a cash basis.

Fiscal 2019 Renewals

In fiscal 2019, approximately 7% of our gross leasable area, representing 12 leases totaling 1,485,770 square feet, is set to expire. As of the date of this Annual Report, 5 of the 12 leases have renewed. The five leases that have renewed thus far represent 802,595 square feet, or 54% of the expiring square footage, and have a weighted average lease term of 8.4 years.

We have incurred or we expect to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $1,786,000 and leasing commission costs of approximately $991,000 in connection with these five lease renewals. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the five leases which were renewed. In addition, the table below includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing commission costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged annually over the renewal term.

Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Somerset, NJ Taco Bell  21,365  $4.68  $4.68  10/14/18 $5.15  $5.15  10/14/23  5.0  $-0-  $-0- 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX Carrier Enterprise  184,317   8.20   8.55  01/11/19  6.24   6.00  01/31/24  5.0   0.20   0.39 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH (2) Siemens Real Estate  51,130   8.82   9.67  04/30/19  8.94   8.50  04/30/24  5.0   0.40   0.40 
Memphis, TN (2) FedEx Express  449,900   2.84   2.95  05/31/19  3.10   3.10  05/31/29  10.0   0.30   0.09 
Jacksonville, FL FedEx Express  95,883   5.40   5.40  05/31/19  5.59   5.59  05/31/29  10.0   0.16   0.11 
  Total  802,595                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $4.81  $5.00    $4.55  $4.46     8.4  $0.26  $0.15 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
(2)We have agreed to the renewal terms with the tenant and the finalized signed lease is forthcoming.

These five lease renewals result in a weighted average term of 8.4 years and a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $4.55 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is $4.46. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $4.81 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.00 per square foot, resulting in a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 5.4% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 10.8% on a cash basis.

As discussed above, in the Fiscal 2018 Renewal section, our 91,776 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC, was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and renewed for only four months, until November 30, 2018 because the tenant moved their operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to our newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. The new 265,318 square foot facility is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. In addition, Carrier Enterprise, LLC (United Technologies) informed us that they will not be renewing their lease for our 60,000 square foot facility located in Richmond, VA which expires on November 30, 2018. Both our 91,776 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC and our 60,000 square foot facility located in Richmond, VA are currently being marketed.

40

On September 30, 2018, we had a weighted average lease maturity of 8.1 years with 7.5% of the weighted average gross annualized rent scheduled to expire each year.

Acquisitions, Expansions and Dispositions During Fiscal 2018

Fiscal 2018 Acquisitions

On November 2, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 121,683 square foot industrial building, situated on 16.2 acres, located in Charleston, SC. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX), for 15 years through August 2032. The purchase price was $21,872,170. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $14,200,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.23%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,315,000.

On November 30, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 300,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 123.0 acres, located in Oklahoma City, OK. The building is 100% net-leased to Amazon.com Services, Inc. for 10 years through October 2027. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon.com, Inc. The purchase price was $30,250,000. We obtained a 10 year mortgage loan, amortizing over 18 years, of $19,600,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.64%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,884,000.

On January 22, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 831,764 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.4 acres, located in Savannah, GA. The building is 100% net-leased to Shaw Industries, Inc. for 10 years through September 2027. The purchase price was $57,483,636. We obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $33,300,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.53%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $3,551,000.

On April 6, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 399,440 square foot industrial building, situated on 27.5 acres, located in Daytona Beach, FL. The building is 100% net-leased to B. Braun Medical Inc. for 10 years through April 2028. The purchase price was $30,750,540. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.25%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,130,000.

On June 28, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 362,942 square foot industrial building, situated on 31.3 acres, located in Mobile, AL. The building is 100% net-leased to Amazon.com Services, Inc. for 11 years through November 2028. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon.com, Inc. The purchase price was $33,688,276. We obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.14%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,020,000.

On August 15, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 265,318 square foot industrial building, situated on 48.9 acres, located in Charleston, SC. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. The purchase price was $47,174,296. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $29,860,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.82%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,713,000.

On September 6, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 373,750 square foot industrial building, situated on 92.6 acres, located in Braselton, GA which is in the Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) . The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through February 2033. The purchase price was $61,113,264. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $39,700,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.02%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $3,801,000.

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s ultimate parent, FDX, Amazon.com, Inc. and Shaw Industries, Inc.’s ultimate parent, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. are publicly-owned companies and financial information related to these entities is available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. The references in this report to the SEC’s website are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information on thewww.sec.gov website.

41

Fiscal 2018 Expansions

On November 1, 2017, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., a subsidiary of FDX, located in Indianapolis, IN was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,683,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from April 2024 to October 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $184,000 from approximately $1,533,000, or $4.67 per square foot, to approximately $1,717,000, or $5.24 per square foot.

On September 27, 2018, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Ft. Mill, SC was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,834,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from October 2023 to August 2028. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $183,000 from approximately $1,415,000, or $8.00 per square foot, to approximately $1,598,000, or $9.03 per square foot.

Fiscal 2018 Dispositions

Two leases were set to expire during fiscal 2018 with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) for our 65,067 square foot facility located in Kansas City, MO through July 31, 2018 and our 50,400 square foot facility located in Orangeburg, NY through February 28, 2018. Kellogg informed us that they would not be renewing these leases. On December 18, 2017, we sold our property located in Kansas City, MO for $4,900,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $4,602,000 and, on December 22, 2017, we sold our property located in Orangeburg, NY for $6,170,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,898,000. In conjunction with the sale of these two properties, we simultaneously entered into a lease termination agreement for each property whereby we received a termination fee from Kellogg totaling approximately $210,000 which represents a weighted average of 80% of the then remaining rent due under each respective lease.

On June 1, 2018, we sold a 68,370 square foot building located in Colorado Springs, CO for $5,800,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,465,000. Prior to the sale of this property, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through September 2018. The tenant informed us that they would not be renewing this lease because they have moved their operations from our former 68,370 square foot facility to our newly constructed 225,362 square foot facility, which is also located in Colorado Springs, CO. On June 9, 2016, we purchased this newly constructed 225,362 square foot industrial building, which is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through January 2026.

On June 5, 2018, we sold an 87,500 square foot vacant building located in Ft. Myers, FL for $6,400,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $6,119,000. Prior to this property becoming vacant, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through June 2017. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. vacated this property because they moved their operations from our former 87,500 square foot facility to our newly constructed 213,672 square foot facility, which is also located in Ft. Myers, FL. We purchased this newly constructed facility on December 30, 2016 and it is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through August 2027.

These four properties sold during fiscal 2018, resulted in a U.S. GAAP net realized gain of approximately $7,485,000, representing a 51% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a net realized gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis of approximately $1,160,000, representing a 6% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis.

Comparison of Year Ended September 30, 2018 to Year Ended September 30, 2017

The following tables summarize our rental revenue, reimbursement revenue, real estate taxes, operating expenses, and depreciation expense by category. For the purposes of the following discussion, same properties are properties owned as of October 1, 2016 that have not been subsequently expanded or sold.

42

Acquired Properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to September 30, 2016. Seventeen properties were acquired during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017. Acquired properties include the properties located in Hamburg (Buffalo), NY; Ft. Myers, FL; Walker (Grand Rapids), MI; Mesquite (Dallas), TX; Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC; Homestead (Miami), FL; Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl Distribution Oklahoma, Inc.); Concord (Charlotte) NC; Kenton, OH and Stow, OH (all acquired in fiscal 2017) and Charleston, SC (FDX); Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon.com Services, Inc.); Savannah, GA; Daytona Beach, FL; Mobile, AL; Charleston, SC (FDX Ground) and Braselton (Atlanta), GA (all acquired in fiscal 2018).

During fiscal 2018 and 2017, there were four property expansions completed at the properties located in Edinburg, TX; Ft. Myers, FL; Indianapolis, IN and Ft. Mill, SC. Expanded Properties include these properties that were expanded subsequent to September 30, 2016, with the exception of the property located in Ft. Myers, FL. Since this property was acquired in fiscal 2017 and subsequently expanded, it is therefore included in Acquired Properties instead of being included in Expanded Properties.

Sold property consists of four properties sold during fiscal 2018 located in Kansas City, MO; Orangeburg, NY; Colorado Springs, CO and Ft. Myers, FL and one property sold during fiscal 2017 located in White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul), MN.

As of September 30, 2018 and 2017, the occupancy rates of our total property portfolio were 99.6% and 99.3%, respectively.

Rental Revenues 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $84,576,670  $84,905,418  $(328,748)  0%
Acquired Properties  26,492,913   7,086,464   19,406,449   274%
Expanded Properties  4,220,958   4,045,681   175,277   4%
Sold Properties  573,578   1,622,215   (1,048,637)  (65%)
Total $115,864,119  $97,659,778  $18,204,341   19%

The increase in rental revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.

Reimbursement Revenues 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $19,056,041  $17,259,734  $1,796,307   10%
Acquired Properties  3,048,604   285,207   2,763,397   969%
Expanded Properties  837,855   750,966   86,889   12%
Sold Properties  355,230   429,620   (74,390)  (17%)
Total $23,297,730  $18,725,527  $4,572,203   24%

Our single tenant properties are subject to net leases, which require the tenants to absorb the real estate taxes, insurance and the majority of the repairs and maintenance. As such, we are reimbursed by the tenants for these expenses. Therefore, the increase in reimbursement revenues is offset by the increase in Real Estate Taxes and the increase in Operating Expenses, which includes insurance, repairs and maintenance and other operating expenses. In addition, the increase in reimbursement revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties. The increase in reimbursement revenues from Same Properties is due to the increase in Same Properties real estate taxes and operating expenses reimbursed to use from our tenants.

Real Estate Taxes 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $15,274,719  $14,021,691  $1,253,028   9%
Acquired Properties  2,314,184   183,102   2,131,082   1164%
Expanded Properties  795,408   710,196   85,212   12%
Sold Properties  211,928   351,645   (139,717)  (40)%
Total $18,596,239  $15,266,634  $3,329,605   22%

43

The increase in real estate taxes is mainly due to the newly acquired properties. The increase from same properties is mainly due to an increase in assessment values.

Operating Expenses 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $4,791,211  $4,410,009  $381,202   9%
Acquired Properties  789,115   124,946   664,169   532%
Expanded Properties  103,660   88,025   15,635   18%
Sold Properties  109,892   264,942   (155,050)  (59%)
Total $5,793,878  $4,887,922  $905,956   19%

The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to the newly acquired properties.

Net Operating Income (NOI)* 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $83,566,781  $83,733,452  $(166,671)  0%
Acquired Properties  26,438,218   7,063,623   19,374,595   274%
Expanded Properties  4,159,745   3,998,426   161,319   4%
Sold Properties  606,988   1,435,248   (828,260)  (58%)
Total $114,771,732  $96,230,749  $18,540,983   19%

The increase in NOI is mainly due to the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.

* The revenue and expense items related to property operations discussed above are components of NOI which are recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses. NOI is a non-GAAP performance measure. See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Overview” for a reconciliation of our Net Operating Income to our Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders.

Depreciation 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $25,695,488  $25,607,021  $88,467   0%
Acquired Properties  9,223,271   2,399,641   6,823,630   284%
Expanded Properties  1,218,756   1,157,830   60,926   5%
Sold Properties  38,408   470,506   (432,098)  (92%)
Total $36,175,923  $29,634,998  $6,540,925   22%

The increase in depreciation expense is mainly due to the newly acquired properties.

Interest Expense, excluding Amortization of Financing Costs 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $16,344,050  $19,032,723  $(2,688,673)  (14%)
Acquired Properties  9,368,794   2,156,392   7,212,402   334%
Expanded Properties  509,024   588,191   (79,167)  (13%)
Sold Properties  38,272   143,510   (105,238)  (73%)
Loans Payable  4,868,582   2,599,046   2,269,536   87%
Total $31,128,722  $24,519,862  $6,608,860   27%

The increase in interest expense is mainly due to the acquisition of new properties. Interest expense for same properties decreased mainly due to the reduction in the outstanding fixed rate mortgage balance related to these properties. The outstanding fixed rate mortgage balance related to these properties was reduced mainly due to the payoff of five fixed rate mortgage loans totaling approximately $12,487,000 and regularly scheduled principal amortization payments made during fiscal 2018. In addition, the weighted average interest rate on our fixed rate debt decreased from 4.18% as of September 30, 2017 to 4.07% as of September 30, 2018.

44

Acquisition Costs

Acquisition costs that were expensed in the Consolidated Statement of Income decreased $178,526, or 100% during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, effective as of April 1, 2017, as permitted under the standard, we no longer account for our property acquisitions as business combinations and instead we account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets. In an acquisition of assets, certain acquisition costs are capitalized to real estate investments as part of the purchase price as opposed to being expensed as Acquisition Costs under the accounting treatment for business combinations previously used. Therefore, as of April 1, 2017, we no longer expensed any Acquisition Costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $967,033, or 12%, during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in salaries and director fees which were due to a combination of increases in wage rates and headcount of employees and a combination of increases in director fees and headcount of directors. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of gross revenue, (which includes Rental Revenue, Reimbursement Revenue and Dividend and Interest Income), decreased by 8% to 5.8% for fiscal year 2018 from 6.3% for fiscal year 2017. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation), decreased by 4% to 46 basis points from 48 basis points for the fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Dividend and Interest Income

Dividend and Interest Income increased $6,189,901, or 89%, during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017. This is mainly due to the higher average carrying value of the REIT securities portfolio during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 as compared to during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017. In addition, the REIT securities portfolio earned a higher weighted average yield of approximately 9.5% during fiscal 2018 as compared to 7.7% for fiscal 2017.

Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net

Realized gain on sales of securities transactions, net consisted of the following:

  2018  2017 
       
Gross realized gains $112,272  $2,320,561 
Gross realized losses  (885)  (8,847)
Total Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net $111,387  $2,311,714 

We had an accumulated net unrealized loss on our securities portfolio of $24,744,579 as of September 30, 2018.

Comparison of Year Ended September 30, 2017 to Year Ended September 30, 2016

The following tables summarize our rental revenue, reimbursement revenue, real estate taxes, operating expenses, and depreciation expense by category. For the purposes of the following discussion, same properties are properties owned as of October 1, 2015 that have not been subsequently expanded or sold.

Acquired Properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to September 30, 2015. Eighteen properties were acquired during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016. Acquired properties include the properties located in Concord (Charlotte), NC; Covington (New Orleans), LA; Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA; Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA; Colorado Springs, CO; Louisville, KY; Davenport (Orlando), FL and Olathe (Kansas City), KS (all acquired in fiscal 2016) and Hamburg (Buffalo), NY; Ft. Myers, FL; Walker (Grand Rapids), MI; Mesquite (Dallas), TX; Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC; Homestead (Miami), FL; Oklahoma City, OK; Concord (Charlotte), NC; Kenton, OH and Stow, OH (all acquired in fiscal 2017).

45

During fiscal 2017 and 2016, there were five property expansions completed at the properties located in Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS; Huntsville, AL; Tampa, FL (FedEx Ground); Edinburg, TX and Ft. Myers, FL. Expanded Properties include these properties that were expanded subsequent to September 30, 2015, with the exception of the property located in Ft. Myers, FL. Since this property was acquired in fiscal 2017 and subsequently expanded, it is therefore included in Acquired Properties instead of being included in Expanded Properties.

Sold property consists of one property located in White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul), MN that was sold on October 27, 2016.

As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, the occupancy rates of our total property portfolio were 99.3% and 99.6%, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on November 1, 2017, we leased our previously vacant 36,270 square foot facility located in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA for 10.2 years which increased our current occupancy rate to 99.5%.

Rental Revenues 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $70,047,915  $70,082,404  $(34,489)  (0%)
Acquired Properties  21,360,523   6,573,225   14,787,298   225%
Expanded Properties  6,251,340   4,936,800   1,314,540   27%
Sold Property  -0-   -0-   -0-   0%
Total $97,659,778  $81,592,429  $16,067,349   20%

The increase in rental revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.

Reimbursement Revenues 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $15,204,496  $14,343,308  $861,188   6%
Acquired Properties  2,476,183   862,919   1,613,264   187%
Expanded Properties  1,017,657   956,777   60,880   6%
Sold Property  27,191   -0-   27,191   -0- 
Total $18,725,527  $16,163,004  $2,562,523   16%

Our single tenant properties are subject to net leases, which require the tenants to absorb the real estate taxes, insurance and the majority of the repairs and maintenance. As such, we are reimbursed by the tenants for these expenses. Therefore, the increase in reimbursement revenues is offset by the increase in Real Estate Taxes and the increase in Operating Expenses, which includes insurance, repairs and maintenance and other operating expenses. In addition, the increase in reimbursement revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties.

Real Estate Taxes 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $12,493,623  $11,713,809  $779,814   7%
Acquired Properties  2,090,454   804,831   1,285,623   160%
Expanded Properties  673,702   660,994   12,708   2%
Sold Property  8,855   115,090   (106,235)  (92%)
Total $15,266,634  $13,294,724  $1,971,910   15%

46

The increase in real estate taxes is mainly due to the newly acquired properties. The increase from same properties is mainly due to an increase in assessment values.

Operating Expenses 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $3,900,093  $3,795,817  $104,276   3%
Acquired Properties  506,964   92,184   414,780   450%
Expanded Properties  348,491   343,029   5,462   2%
Sold Property  132,374   42,869   89,505   209%
Total $4,887,922  $4,273,899  $614,023   14%

The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to the newly acquired properties.

Net Operating Income (NOI)* 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $68,858,695  $68,916,086  $(57,391)  (0%)
Acquired Properties  21,239,288   6,539,129   14,700,159   225%
Expanded Properties  6,246,804   4,889,554   1,357,250   28%
Sold Property  (114,038)  (157,959)  43,921   28%
Total $96,230,749  $80,186,810  $16,043,939   20%

The increase in NOI is mainly due to the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.

* The revenue and expense items related to property operations discussed above are components of NOI which are recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses. NOI is a non-GAAP performance measure. See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Overview” for a reconciliation of our Net Operating Income to our Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders.

Depreciation 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $20,846,253  $20,554,181  $292,072   1%
Acquired Properties  7,076,142   2,078,557   4,997,585   240%
Expanded Properties  1,704,597   1,326,210   378,387   29%
Sold Property  8,006   96,074   (88,068)  (92%)
Total $29,634,998  $24,055,022  $5,579,976   23%

The increase in depreciation expense is mainly due to the newly acquired and expanded properties.

Interest Expense, excluding Amortization of Financing Costs 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $13,264,189  $16,408,865  $(3,144,676)  (19%)
Acquired Properties  7,406,520   1,805,226   5,601,294   310%
Expanded Properties  1,250,107   991,826   258,281   26%
Sold Property  -0-   -0-   -0-   0%
Loans Payable  2,599,046   2,630,894   (31,848)  (1%)
Total $24,519,862  $21,836,811  $2,683,051   12%

The increase in interest expense is mainly due to the acquisition of new properties. Interest expense for same properties decreased mainly due to the reduction in the outstanding fixed rate mortgage balance related to these properties. The outstanding fixed rate mortgage balance related to these properties was reduced mainly due to the payoff of 16 fixed rate mortgage loans totaling approximately $40,037,000 and regularly scheduled principal amortization payments made during fiscal 2017. In addition, the weighted average interest rate on our fixed rate debt decreased from 4.48% as of September 30, 2016 to 4.18% as of September 30, 2017.

47

Acquisition Costs

Acquisition costs that were expensed in the Consolidated Statement of Income decreased $551,915, or 76% during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, effective as of April 1, 2017, as permitted under the standard, we no longer account for our property acquisitions as business combinations and instead we account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets. In an acquisition of assets, certain acquisition costs are capitalized to real estate investments as part of the purchase price as opposed to being expensed as Acquisition Costs under the accounting treatment for business combinations previously used. Therefore, as of April 1, 2017, we no longer are required to expense our Acquisition Costs. Two properties totaling approximately $56,102,000 were acquired during the first half of fiscal 2017, prior to April 1, 2017 and eight properties totaling approximately $210,747,000 were acquired during fiscal 2016.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased $126,578, or 2%, during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. The decrease in fiscal 2017 was partially due to a one-time $400,000 cash signing bonus granted to the President and Chief Executive Officer in accordance with his amended employment agreement during fiscal 2016 and due to a one-time $100,000 severance payment made to a former employee during fiscal 2016. Additionally, during fiscal 2016, the Founder and Chairman of the Board was granted a discretionary award of 40,000 shares of restricted stock which vest in equal annual installments over the next five years and has a grant date fair value of $13.64 per share, for a total grant date fair value of $545,600. Since the Founder and Chairman of the Board is of retirement age, the entire fair value of the grant was fully expensed on the grant date during fiscal 2016. These one-time fiscal 2016 expenses were partially offset by increases in all employees’ wage rates and professional fees incurred during fiscal 2017. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of gross revenue, (which includes Rental Revenue, Reimbursement Revenue and Dividend and Interest Income), decreased by 18% to 6.3% for fiscal year 2017 from 7.7% for fiscal year 2016. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation), decreased by 17% to 48 basis points from 58 basis points for the fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Dividend and Interest Income

Dividend and Interest Income increased $1,314,172, or 23%, during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. This is mainly due to the higher average carrying value of the REIT securities portfolio during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as compared to during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The REIT securities portfolio weighted average yield for fiscal 2017 was approximately 7.7% as compared to 8.0% for fiscal 2016.

Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net

Realized gain on sales of securities transactions, net consisted of the following:

  2017  2016 
       
Gross realized gains $2,320,561  $4,403,724 
Gross realized losses  (8,847)  (5,125)
Total Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net $2,311,714  $4,398,599 

We had an accumulated net unrealized gain on our securities portfolio of $6,570,565 as of September 30, 2017.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.

48

Contractual Obligations

The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2018:

Contractual

Obligations

 

Total

  Less than
one year
  

1-3 years

  

3-5 years

  More than
5 years
 
                
Mortgage Notes Payable $719,768,355  $60,151,223  $98,703,799  $122,553,702  $438,359,631 
Interest on Mortgage Notes Payable  196,867,159   28,039,774   49,122,612   39,168,341   80,536,432 
Loans Payable (1)  186,608,676   76,608,676   110,000,000   -0-   -0- 
Interest on Loans Payable  8,650,600   4,360,600   4,290,000   -0-   -0- 
Purchase of Properties  153,995,275   113,081,132   40,914,143   -0-   -0- 
Expansions of Existing Properties  6,855,608   6,855,608   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Operating Lease Obligation  439,788   134,446   271,376   33,966   -0- 
Retirement Benefits  600,000   50,000   50,000   -0-   500,000 
Total $1,273,785,461  $289,281,459  $303,351,930  $161,756,009  $519,396,063 

(1)On October 9, 2018, the total Loans Payable outstanding balance was reduced to $110,000,000.

                Mortgage notes payable represents the principal amounts outstanding by scheduled maturity as of September 30, 2018. Interest is payable on these mortgages at fixed rates ranging from 3.45% to 7.60%, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.07%. As of September 30, 2018, the weighted average loan maturity of the mortgage notes payable is 11.7 years. This compares to a weighted average interest rate of 4.18% as of September 30, 2017 and a weighted average loan maturity of the mortgage notes payable of 11.6 years as of September 30, 2017. The Mortgage Notes Payable in the above table does not include one 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%, which was obtained subsequent to the 2018 fiscal yearend in connection with the purchase of one property for $85,248,352. The cost of these acquisitions, purchased subsequent to yearend, is included in the Purchase of Properties in the above table.

As of September 30, 2018, Loans Payable represented the amount drawn down on our $200,000,000 unsecured line of credit facility (the “Facility”) in the amount of $160,000,000 and the amount drawn down on our margin line of credit from our marketable securities in the amount of $26,608,676. The Facility matures in September 2020 with a one-year extension at our option (subject to various conditions as specified in the loan agreement). During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, we had net draws of $50,000,000 under the Facility. Availability under the Facility is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a capitalization rate to the NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Effective, March 22, 2018, the capitalization rate applied to our NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties was lowered from 7.0% to 6.5%, thus increasing the value of the borrowing base properties under the terms of the agreement. Borrowings under the Facility, will, at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140 basis points to 220 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 40 basis points to 120 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Our borrowings as of September 30, 2018, based on our leverage ratio as of September 30, 2018, bear interest at LIBOR plus 170 basis points, which was at an interest rate of 3.90% as of September 30, 2018. In addition, we have a $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability under the Facility (subject to various conditions as specified in the loan agreement) up to $300,000,000. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility which reduced our amount outstanding under the Facility to $110,000,000.

We also invest in equity marketable securities of other REITs, which provides us with additional diversification, liquidity, and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available. From time to time, we may purchase these securities on margin when the interest and dividend yields exceed the cost of funds. In general, we may borrow up to 50% of the value of the marketable securities, which was $154,920,545 as of September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, we had borrowings of $26,608,676 under our margin line, bearing interest at 2.75%. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

49

The contractual obligation for the Interest on Loans Payable amount is determined using an interest rate of 3.90% on the amount drawn down on the Facility of $160,000,000 through October 9, 2018 and $110,000,000 thereafter and is determined using an interest rate of 2.75% for interest on the amount drawn down on the margin loan through the date it was paid off on October 9, 2018.

Purchase of properties represents commitments we had entered into as of September 30, 2018 to purchase three industrial properties totaling approximately 745,000 square feet. One of the three properties, amounting to approximately $85,248,000 and totaling approximately 347,000 square feet, was acquired subsequent to our fiscal yearend. We expect to close on the two remaining properties, amounting to approximately $68,747,000 and approximately 398,000 square feet, during fiscal 2019 and 2020, subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements.

Expansions of existing properties represent the remaining costs expected to be incurred as of September 30, 2018 in connection with a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Ft. Mill, SC and for a 154,800 square foot building expansion for a property lease to UGN, Inc. located in Monroe, OH. The expansion at the property located in Ft. Mill, SC was substantially completed on September 27, 2018 for a cost of approximately $1,834,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from October 2023 to August 2028. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $183,000 from approximately $1,415,000, or $8.00 per square foot to approximately $1,598,000, or $9.03 per square foot. The expansion at the property located in Monroe, OH is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2019 for a total project cost of approximately $9,072,000, which will result in a new 15 year lease which will extend the prior lease expiration date from February 2030 to January 2034. In addition, the expansion will result in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion by approximately $862,000 from approximately $961,000, or $4.14 per square foot, to approximately $1,823,000, or $4.71 per square foot. In addition, the annual rent will increase 2% per annum.

Operating lease obligation represents the lease for our current 5,680 square foot corporate office located in Freehold, NJ which is leased through December 2021.

Retirement Benefits of $600,000 represent the total future amount to be paid, on an undiscounted basis, relating to one executive officer, Mr. Eugene W. Landy, the Founder and Chairman of the Board. These benefits are based upon a specific employment agreement. The agreement does not require us to separately fund the obligation and therefore these amounts will be paid from our general assets. We have accrued these benefits on a present value basis over the term of the employment agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We operate as a REIT deriving our income primarily from real estate rental operations. Our shareholders’ equity increased from $712,865,696 as of September 30, 2017 to $797,905,767 as of September 30, 2018, due to the issuance of 5,816,443 shares of common stock in the amount of $90,028,789 through the DRIP, stock compensation expense of $433,895, exercise of stock options consisting of 40,000 shares for total proceeds of $569,600, Net Income Attributable to common shareholders of $38,815,344 and the issuance of 1,648,556 shares of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock issued in connection with the Preferred Stock ATM Program, net of offering costs in the amount of approximately $40,094,000. The increases were partially offset by payments of cash distributions paid to common shareholders of $53,586,063 and the net decrease in unrealized gains/loss on investments of $31,315,144. See further discussion below.

Our ability to generate cash adequate to meet our needs is dependent primarily on income from our real estate investments and our securities portfolio, the sale of real estate investments and securities, refinancing of mortgage debt, leveraging of real estate investments, availability of bank borrowings, proceeds from the DRIP, proceeds from the Preferred Stock ATM Program, proceeds from public offerings and private placements of additional common or preferred stock or other securities, and access to the capital markets. Purchases of new properties, payments of expenses related to real estate operations, capital improvement programs, debt service, general and administrative expenses, and distribution requirements place demands on our liquidity.

50

We intend to operate our properties from the cash flows generated by our properties. However, our expenses are affected by various factors, including inflation. Increases in operating expenses are predominantly borne by the tenant. To the extent that these increases cannot be passed on through rent reimbursements, these increases will reduce the amount of available cash flow which can adversely affect the market value of the property.

As of September 30, 2018, we had $9,324,585 in Cash and Cash Equivalents and $154,920,545 in marketable securities. In addition, as of September 30, 2018, we had $40,000,000 available under our Facility. The Facility provides for up to $200,000,000 in available borrowings with a $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $300,000,000, subject to certain conditions. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility, which reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.

We have been raising equity capital through our DRIP, Preferred Stock ATM Program, registered direct placements, the public sale of common and preferred stock and through our free cash flow generated from our investments in net-leased industrial properties. We believe that funds generated from operations, the DRIP, the Preferred Stock ATM Program and bank borrowings, together with the ability to finance and refinance our properties, will provide sufficient funds to adequately meet our obligations over the next few years.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, in October 2018, we completed a public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $132,339,000.

As of September 30, 2018, we owned 111 properties, of which 61 are subject to mortgages. On August 27, 2015, we obtained an unsecured revolving line of credit (the “Facility”). The Facility is syndicated with three banks led by BMO, as sole lead arranger and sole book runner, Bank of Montreal as administrative agent, and includes JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (J.P. Morgan) and RBC Capital Markets (RBC) as co-syndication agents. The Facility provided for up to $130,000,000 in available borrowings with a $70,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $200,000,000, subject to certain conditions. The Facility was set to mature in August 2019 and had a one-year extension option, at our option. On September 30, 2016, we entered into an amendment to the Facility (the Amendment), pursuant to which we exercised the $70,000,000 accordion feature under the Facility, bringing the maximum availability under the Facility to $200,000,000, and amended the Facility to provide an additional $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $300,000,000, subject to certain conditions, including, without limitation, obtaining commitments from additional lenders. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity date of the Facility from August 27, 2019 to September 30, 2020, with a one-year extension option, at our option, subject to certain conditions. Availability under the Facility is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a capitalization rate to the NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Effective, March 22, 2018, the capitalization rate applied to our NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties was lowered from 7.0% to 6.5%, thus increasing the value of the borrowing base properties under the terms of the agreement. Borrowings under the Facility, will, at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140 basis points to 220 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 40 basis points to 120 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Our borrowings as of September 30, 2018, based on our leverage ratio as of September 30, 2018, bear interest at LIBOR plus 170 basis points, which was at an interest rate of 3.90% as of September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, $160,000,000 was drawn down under the Facility. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility which reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.

We also use margin loans from time to time for purchasing securities, for temporary funding of acquisitions, and for working capital purposes. The interest rate charged on the margin loans is the bank’s margin rate and was 2.75% and 2.05% as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The margin loans are due on demand and are collateralized by our securities portfolio. We must maintain a coverage ratio of approximately 50%. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, there was $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 outstanding under the margin loans, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

51

Our focus is on real estate investments. We have historically financed purchases of real estate primarily through long-term, fixed rate mortgages.

During fiscal 2018, we purchased seven industrial properties totaling approximately 2,655,000 square feet with net-leased terms ranging from 10 to 15 years resulting in a weighted average lease maturity of 11.4 years. Approximately 2,255,000 square feet, or 85% of the properties purchased, are leased to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries, of which, approximately 761,000 square feet, or 29%, is leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX) or FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., a subsidiary of FDX. The aggregate purchase price for the seven properties was approximately $282,332,000. These properties are located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma and South Carolina. These seven properties generate annualized rental income over the life of their leases of approximately $17,414,000. In connection with the seven properties acquired during the 2018 fiscal year, we entered into four 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans, two 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans and one 10 year loan amortizing over 18 years. The seven mortgage loans originally totaled $175,160,000 with an original weighted average mortgage loan maturity of 14.1 years and a weighted average interest rate of 3.91%.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 19, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 347,145 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.0 acres, located in Trenton, NJ. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2032. The purchase price was $85,248,352. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $5,328,000.

The industrial property purchased thus far during fiscal 2019 increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 21,521,000.

In addition to the property purchased subsequent to our fiscal yearend, as described above, we have entered into agreements to purchase two new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Georgia and North Carolina, consisting of approximately 398,000 square feet, with net-leased terms ranging from 10 to 15 years, with a weighted average lease term of 13.4 years.  The purchase price for these properties is approximately $68,747,000 and both are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing these transactions during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020.  In connection with one of these properties, we have entered into a commitment to obtain a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $17,500,000 with a fixed interest rate of 4.40%. We also have entered into a commitment to expand our property located in Monroe, OH by 154,800 square feet, increasing the building to 387,000 square feet. The expansion is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2019 for a total project cost of approximately $9,072,000, which will result in a new 15 year lease which will extend the prior lease expiration date from February 2030 to January 2034. In addition, the expansion will result in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion by approximately $862,000 from approximately $961,000, or $4.14 per square foot, to approximately $1,823,000, or $4.71 per square foot. In addition, the annual rent will increase 2% per annum. We may make additional acquisitions and expansions in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020, and the funds for these acquisitions and expansions may come from funds generated from operations, mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, sale of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP), proceeds from the At-The-Market Preferred Equity Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program), and proceeds from private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities. To the extent that funds or appropriate properties are not available, fewer acquisitions will be made.

We also invest in marketable securities of other REITs as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available, for liquidity, and for additional income. We generally limit our marketable securities investments to no more than approximately 10% of our undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). From time to time, we may purchase these securities on margin when there is an adequate yield spread. During fiscal 2018, our securities portfolio increased $31,155,775, due to purchases of $64,979,698 offset by the decrease in the net unrealized loss of $31,315,144 and the sale of securities with a cost of $2,508,779. We recognized gains on sales of securities of $111,387 in addition to earning Dividend and Interest Income of $13,120,465 during fiscal 2018. In general, we may borrow up to 50% of the value of the marketable securities, which was $154,920,545 as of September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, we had borrowings of $26,608,676 under our margin line, bearing interest at 2.75%. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

52

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $85,529,162, $73,867,866 and $54,699,500 for fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increase in cash flows provided from operating activities from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2018 and from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017 is primarily due to the increased income generated from acquisitions of properties and expanded operations.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $332,513,200, $339,071,013 and $227,845,089 for fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2018 decreased as compared to 2017 due mainly to a decrease in the purchase of real estate and purchase of securities available for sale. This decrease was offset by an increase in proceeds from the sale of real estate from the four properties that were sold during fiscal 2018. Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2017 increased as compared to 2016 due mainly to an increase in the purchase of real estate and purchase of securities available for sale.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $246,082,577, $179,679,685 and $256,821,188 for fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash flows from financing activities increased in fiscal 2018 as compared to 2017 mainly due to net proceeds of $66,517,259 from loans payable and net draws from the Facility of $50,000,000. Cash flows from financing activities decreased in fiscal 2017 as compared to 2016 due mainly to the redemption of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock and 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock in the amount of $110,993,750 and the payoff of 16 mortgage notes payable in the amount of $40,037,099. This decrease was offset by an increase in proceeds from mortgage loans in the amount of $35,380,515, the proceeds from the issuance of 4,439,445 shares of the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock with net proceeds of $106,736,978 and net draws from the Facility of $34,000,000. In addition, we paid cash dividends (net of reinvestments), of $40,657,707, $36,163,355 and $33,665,037 for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

As of September 30, 2018, we had total assets of $1,718,377,886 and liabilities of $920,472,119. Our total debt to total market capitalization as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 was approximately 35% and 33%, respectively. Our net debt (net of cash and cash equivalents) to total market capitalization as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 was approximately 35% and 32%, respectively. Our net debt, less securities (net of cash and cash equivalents and net of securities) to total market capitalization as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 was approximately 29% and 26%, respectively. We believe that we have the ability to meet our obligations and to generate funds for new investments.

We have a DRIP, in which participants can purchase our stock at a price of approximately 95% of market value. Amounts received in connection with the DRIP, (including dividend reinvestments of $12,928,356, $10,125,894 and $8,369,146 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively) were $90,028,789, $91,931,831 and $72,175,797 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During fiscal 2018, we paid total distributions to holders of our common stock of $53,586,063, or $0.68 per common share. Of the dividends paid, $12,928,356 was reinvested pursuant to the terms of the DRIP, representing a 24% participation rate. On October 1, 2018, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.17 per share, to be paid on December 17, 2018, to common shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2018, which represents an annualized common dividend rate of $0.68 per share. We intend to pay these distributions from cash flows from operations.

We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 27 consecutive years. On October 1, 2015, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly common stock cash dividend from $0.15 per share to $0.16 per share representing a 6.7% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. Then again, most recently, on October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly common stock cash dividend and from $0.16 per share to $0.17 per share on October 2, 2017, representing a 6.3% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. These two dividend raises represent a total increase of 13%.

53

Our common stock dividend policy is dependent upon our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, availability and cost of bank financing and other factors considered relevant by the Board of Directors. It is our intention to continue making comparable quarterly distributions in the future and to grow our distributions over time. We anticipate maintaining the annual dividend rate of $0.68 per common share although no assurances can be given since various economic factors may reduce the amount of cash flow available to us for common dividends. All decisions with respect to the payment of dividends are made by our Board of Directors, subject to limitations under our financing arrangements and Maryland law.

During fiscal 2018, we paid $16,876,532 in preferred stock dividends and accrued $313,924 of preferred stock dividends.

On September 13, 2016, we issued 5,400,000 shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock at an offering price of $25.00 per share in an underwritten public offering. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses, of approximately $130,543,000. On October 14, 2016, we used $53,493,750 of the net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of the 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of our 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, we used $498,540 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, up to and including the redemption date of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock.

On March 9, 2017, we issued an additional 3,000,000 shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, at a public offering price of $24.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $73,500,000, before deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses. Net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses, were approximately $71,003,000. On June 7, 2017, we used $57,500,000 of the net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of our 2,300,000 issued and outstanding shares of our 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, we used $75,469 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, up to and not including the redemption date of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock.

On June 29, 2017, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or B. Riley (formerly FBR Capital Markets & Co.), that provided for the offer and sale of shares of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, or our 6.125% Series C preferred stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) with B. Riley that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000 of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock. We began selling shares through these programs on July 3, 2017. Since inception through September 30, 2018, we sold 3,088,001 shares under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000, of which 1,648,556 shares were sold during the fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $40,094,000. As of September 30, 2018, there is approximately $119,096,000 remaining that may be sold under the Preferred Stock ATM Program.

As of September 30, 2018, 11,488,001 shares of the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, in October 2018, we completed a public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $132,339,000.

We are required to pay cumulative dividends on our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock in the amount of $1.53125 per share per year, which is equivalent to 6.125% of the $25.00 liquidation value per share. As of September 30, 2018, we have a total of 11,488,001 shares of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock outstanding, representing an aggregate liquidation preference of $287,200,025.

54

During the year ended September 30, 2018, stock options to purchase 40,000 shares were exercised at an exercise price of $14.24 per share for total proceeds of $569,600.

On an ongoing basis, we fund capital expenditures, primarily to maintain our properties. These expenditures may also include expansions as requested by tenants, or various tenant improvements on properties which are re-tenanted. The amounts of these expenditures can vary from year to year depending on the age of the properties, tenant negotiations, market conditions and lease turnover. Our 111 properties, totaling approximately 21,174,000 square feet, have a weighted average building age, based on the square footage of our buildings, of 8.7 years.

During the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we completed a total of seven property expansions, consisting of three building expansions and four parking lot expansions. Three of the four parking lot expansions included the purchase of additional land. The three building expansions resulted in approximately 312,000 additional square feet. Total costs for all seven property expansions were approximately $22,189,000 and resulted in total increased annual rent of approximately $2,090,000. Six completed expansions resulted in new ten year lease extensions for the expanded properties and one completed expansion resulted in a new twelve year lease extension. The weighted average lease extension for these seven property expansions is 10.9 years.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, “Leases”. ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 will become effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The most significant changes related to lessor accounting under ASU 2016-02 include bifurcating revenue into lease and non-lease components and the new standard’s narrow definition of initial direct costs for leases. Since our revenue is primarily derived from leasing activities from long-term net leases and since we currently do not capitalize indirect costs for leases, we believe that will continue to account for our leases and related leasing costs in substantially the same manner as we currently do once the adoption of the ASU 2016-02 becomes effective.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases”. The amendment in ASU 2018-10 affects narrow aspects of the guidance issued earlier in ASU 2016-02 by removing certain inconsistencies and providing additional clarification related to the guidance issued earlier. ASU 2018-10 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. These changes became effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. The most significant change for us, once ASU 2016-01 was adopted, was the accounting treatment for our investments in marketable securities that are classified as available for sale. The accounting treatment used for our Consolidated Financial Statements through Fiscal 2018, was that our investments in marketable securities, classified as available for sale, were carried at fair value, with net unrealized holding gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized and the change in net unrealized holding gains and losses being reflected as comprehensive income (loss). Under ASU 2016-01, effective October 1, 2018, these marketable securities continue to be measured at fair value, however the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses are now recognized through net income. Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2018, unrealized net holding losses of $24,744,579 were reclassed to beginning retained earnings to recognize the unrealized losses previously recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets.

55

 

In February 2015,May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the Consolidation Analysis”amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers”. ASU 2015-02 focuses to minimize situations under previously existingThe FASB issued further guidance in which a reporting entityASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”, that provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and adds some practical expedients. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The effective date of ASU 2014-09 was required to consolidate another legal entity in which that reporting entity did not have: (1) the ability through contractual rights to act primarily on its own behalf; (2) ownershipextended by one year by ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the majority ofEffective Date”. The new standard is effective for the legal entity’s voting rights; or (3) the exposure to a majority of the legal entity’s economic benefits. ASU 2015-02 affectsfirst interim period within annual reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. ASU 2015-02 will be effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption2017. Therefore, we adopted the standard effective October 1, 2018. Our revenue is permitted, including adoptionprimarily derived from leasing activities and historically our property dispositions have been cash sales with no contingencies and no future involvement in an interim period. The Company does not expectthe property. Since this standard applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other guidance, such as leases, the adoption of ASU 2015-02 tothis standard did not have a material effectsignificant impact on the Company’sour consolidated financial statements.statements and related disclosures.

 

Management doesWe do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market-sensitive instruments. The primary market risk to which management believes the Company iswe believe that we are exposed to is interest rate risk. The Company’sOur future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond the Company’sour control contribute to interest rate risk.

 

The Company isWe are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of itsour unsecured line of credit facility, margin loans and long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and acquisitions of the Company’sour real estate investment portfolio. The Company’sOur interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower itsour overall borrowing costs. To achieve itsour objectives, the Company matches itswe match our assets, which are properties secured by long-term leases, with itsour liabilities, which are long termlong-term fixed rate loans.

 

Approximately $486,033,000$719,768,000 of the Company’sour long-term debt as of September 30, 20162018 bears a fixed weighted average interest rate of 4.49%4.07%. Therefore, changes in market interest rates affect the fair value of these instruments. Based on the $76,000,000As of September 30, 2018, our variable rate debt consists of $160,000,000 drawn down on the Facility asand $26,608,676 drawn down on the margin line of September 30, 2016, ifcredit. If market rates of interest on the Company’sour variable rate debt increased or decreased by 1%, then the annual increase or decrease in interest costs on the Company’sour variable rate debt would be approximately $760,000$1,866,000 and the increase or decrease in the fair value of the Company’sour fixed rate debt as of September 30, 20162018 would be approximately $19,000,000.$29,000,000.

 

 5756 

 

The following table sets forth information as of September 30, 2016,2018, concerning the Company’sour long-term debt obligations, including principal payments by scheduled maturity, weighted average interest rates and estimated fair value:

 

 Mortgage Notes Payable Loans Payable  Mortgage Notes Payable Loans Payable (1) 
   Weighted     Weighted      Weighted     Weighted   
Fiscal Year   Average     Average      Average     Average   
Ending
September 30,
 Carrying
Value
 Interest
Rate
 Fair Value Carrying
Value
 Interest
Rate
 Fair Value  Carrying Value Interest
Rate
 Fair Value Carrying Value Interest
Rate
 Fair Value 
                          
2017 $28,574,458   6.41%     $4,790,684   4.69%    
2018  16,448,460   6.01%      -0-         
2019  21,226,951   6.64%      -0-          $12,361,789   6.93%     $26,608,676   2.75%    
2020  5,620,505   6.13%      76,000,000   2.03%      2,314,257   6.09%      160,000,000   3.90%    
2021  2,692,733   5.96%      -0-           860,364   6.50%      -0-         
2022  29,880,645   5.24%      -0-         
2023  3,719,709   3.95%      -0-         
Thereafter  409,185,046   4.14%      -0-           670,631,591   3.96%      -0-         
Total $483,748,153   4.48% $493,675,000  $80,790,684   2.19% $80,800,000  $719,768,355   4.07% $706,745,000  $186,608,676   3.74% $186,609,000 

(1)On October 9, 2018, the Loans Payable outstanding balance was reduced to $110,000,000

 

On August 27, 2015, the Company replaced its prior $60,000,000we obtained an unsecured revolving line of credit with the Facility.(the “Facility”). The Facility is syndicated with three banks led by BMO, as sole lead arranger and sole book runner, and Bank of Montreal as administrative agent, and includes J.P. MorganJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (J.P. Morgan) and RBC Capital Markets (RBC) as co-syndication agents. The Facility provided for up to $130,000,000 in available borrowings with a $70,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $200,000,000, subject to certain conditions. The Facility was set to mature in August 2019 and had a one-year extension option, at the option of the Company.our option. On September 30, 2016, the Companywe entered into an amendment to the Amendment,Facility (the Amendment), pursuant to which the Companywe exercised the $70,000,000 accordion feature under the Facility, bringing the maximum availability under the Facility to $200,000,000, and amended the Facility to provide an additional $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $300,000,000, subject to certain conditions, including, without limitation, obtaining commitments from additional lenders. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity date of the Facility from August 27, 2019 to September 30, 2020, with a one-year extension option, at theour option, of the Company.subject to certain conditions. Availability under the Facility through December 31, 2016, is limited to 70% of the value of the borrowing base properties, and is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties thereafter.properties. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a 7.0% capitalization rate to the net operating incomeNOI generated by the Company’sour unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Borrowings underEffective, March 22, 2018, the Facility, upcapitalization rate applied to the first 60% ofour NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties was lowered from 7.0% to 6.5%, thus increasing the value of the borrowing base properties under the terms of the agreement. Borrowings under the Facility, will, at the Company’sour election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140 basis points to 220 basis points, depending on the Company’sour leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 40 basis points to 120 basis points, depending on the Company’sour leverage ratio. The Company’s currentOur borrowings are less than 60%as of the value of the borrowing base properties andSeptember 30, 2018, based on the Company’s currentour leverage ratio borrowings under the Facilityas of September 30, 2018, bear interest at LIBOR plus 150170 basis points, which was at an interest rate of 2.03%3.90% as of September 30, 2016.2018. As of September 30, 2016, $76,000,0002018, $160,000,000 was drawn down under the Facility. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility which reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.

 

As of September 30, 2016, the Company had two loans totaling $4,790,684 consisting of a $2,284,633 term loan, (which was paid in full on October 28, 2016) at an annual interest rate of 4.90% and a $2,506,051 term loan maturing on March 9, 2017. Interest on this variable rate term loan accrues at prime plus 0.75% with a floor of 4.50% and the interest rate at September 30, 2016 was 4.50%.

The CompanyWe also investsinvest in marketable securities of other REITs and iswe are primarily exposed to market price risk from adverse changes in market rates and conditions. The CompanyWe generally limits itslimit our marketable securities investments to no more than approximately 10% of itsour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). All securities are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value.

58

The Company obtains We also use margin loans from time to time whichfor purchasing securities, for temporary funding of acquisitions, and for working capital purposes. The margin loans are secureddue on demand and are collateralized by itsour securities portfolio. In general, we may borrow up to 50% of the value of the marketable securities. ThereAt September 30, 2018 and 2017, there was no balance$26,608,676 and $10,091,417 outstanding onunder the margin loan as of September 30, 2016 and 2015.loans, respectively. The interest rate on the margin account is the bank’s margin rate and was 2.00%2.75% and 2.05% as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015. In general,2017, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the Company may borrow up to 50% of the value of the marketable securities.margin loan. The value of the marketable securities was $73,604,894$154,920,545 as of September 30, 2016,2018, representing 5.3%8.0% of the Company’sour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).

57

 

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The financial statements and supplementary data listed in Part IV, Item 15 (a) (1) are incorporated herein by reference and filed as part of this report.

 

The following is the Unaudited Selected Quarterly Financial Data:

 

SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

THREE MONTHS ENDED

 

FISCAL 2016 12/31/15  3/31/16  6/30/16  9/30/16 
             
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $22,259,362  $22,966,838  $24,113,999  $25,575,911 
Total Expenses  11,167,093   12,537,914   11,835,546   13,942,992 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,153,614)  (3,296,977)  (4,047,158)  (1,440,309)
Net Income  6,938,655   7,131,947   8,231,295   10,192,610 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  4,786,897   4,980,189   6,079,537   4,685,265 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.08  $0.08  $0.09  $0.07 

FISCAL 2015 12/31/14  3/31/15  6/30/15  9/30/15 
             
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $17,677,530  $18,858,596  $20,672,282  $20,567,089 
Lease Termination Income  238,625   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total Expenses  9,582,908   10,305,673   11,351,102   10,875,080 
Other Income (Expense)  (2,909,595)  (3,734,243)  (4,145,322)  (4,525,626)
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  -0-   -0-   -0-   5,021,242 
Net Income  5,423,652   4,818,680   5,175,858   10,187,625 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  3,271,894   2,666,922   3,024,100   8,035,867 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.06  $0.04  $0.05  $0.14 

Certain amounts in the Selected Quarterly Financial Data for the prior quarters have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation for the current year.

FISCAL 2018 12/31/17  3/31/18  6/30/18  9/30/18 
             
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $32,741,822  $33,621,508  $36,197,825  $36,600,694 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total Expenses  16,267,991   16,920,664   19,073,092   19,471,976 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,441,577)  (5,055,841)  (4,651,340)  (4,969,095)
Income from Continuing Operations  12,242,515   11,645,003   12,473,393   12,159,623 
Income from Continuing Operations per diluted share $0.16  $0.15  $0.16  $0.15 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  5,387,886   -0-   2,097,380   -0- 
Net Income  17,630,401   11,645,003   14,570,773   12,159,623 
Net Income per diluted share $0.23  $0.15  $0.18  $0.15 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  13,313,455   7,396,784   10,322,744   7,782,361 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.17  $0.10  $0.13  $0.10 
                 
FISCAL 2017  12/31/16   3/31/17   6/30/17   9/30/17 
                 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $27,891,442  $28,018,022  $29,318,927  $31,156,914 
Total Expenses  13,972,561   14,495,329   14,840,339   16,294,148 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,064,960)  (5,098,082)  (2,748,225)  (4,600,576)
Income from Continuing Operations  9,853,921   8,424,611   11,730,363   10,262,190 
Income from Continuing Operations per diluted share $0.14  $0.12  $0.16  $0.14 
Net Income  9,853,921   8,424,611   11,730,363   10,262,190 
Net Income per diluted share $0.14  $0.12  $0.16  $0.14 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  6,156,161   4,842,575   5,217,411   6,726,087 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.09  $0.07  $0.07  $0.09 

 

 5958 

 

ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

There were no changes in, or any disagreements with, the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm on accounting principles and practices or financial disclosure during the years ended September 30, 20162018 and 2015.2017.

 

ITEM 9A- CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2016.2018.

 

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act).

 

Management assessed the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016.2018. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”)(COSO) (2013 framework). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2016.2018.

 

PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP, the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm, has issued their report on their audit of the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting, a copy of which is included herein.

 

(c) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

TheTo the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of
Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation

 

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016,2018, based on criteria established inInternal ControlIntegratedControl–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) (2013 framework)(COSO). Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation’sIn our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018, based on criteria established inInternal Control–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2018, and our report dated November 28, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

59

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based uponon the assessed risk andrisk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

60

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, (3)and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (4)(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO (2013 framework)./s/ PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016 and our report dated November 25, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.28, 2018

New York, New York

 

/s/ PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP

New York, New York
November 25, 2016

(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during the Company’sour fourth fiscal quarter ended September 30, 20162018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

 6160 

PART III

 

ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The following are theour Directors and Executive Officers of the Company as of September 30, 2016:2018:

 

Name

 

 

 

Age

 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

 

Director
Since

 

Class Type

(1)

 Age 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 Director
 Since
 

Class

(1)

Kiernan Conway 56 Independent Director. (2)Director of Research and Corporate Engagement of the Alabama Center for Real Estate, and Chief Economist of the CCIM (Certified Commercial Investment Member) Institute (2017-present). Prior Senior Vice-President of Credit Risk Management for Sun Trust in Atlanta, GA (2014-2017). U.S. Chief Economist for Colliers International (2010-2014). Prior affiliations with Federal Reserve in Atlanta, GA, South Trust Bank, Cushman and Wakefield, Equitable Real Estate, Wells Fargo Bank and Deloitte and Touche. Mr. Conway’s extensive experience as an economist with expertise in real estate, real estate finance and logistics are the primary reasons, among others, why Mr. Conway was selected to serve on our Board. 2018 II
              
Anna T. Chew  58 

Director.Interim Chief Financial Officer (March 2012 to July 2012). Chief Financial Officer (1991 to 2010).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (1995 to present) and Director (1995 to present).

 

Ms. Chew is a Certified Public Accountant. Ms. Chew’s extensive public accounting, finance and real estate industry experience is the primary reason, among others, why Ms. Chew was selected to serve on our Board. 

  2007 I
      
Daniel D. ronheim  62 

Director.Attorney at Law (1979 to present). Certified Property Manager (2010 to present). President (2000 to present) of David Cronheim Mortgage Company, a privately-owned real estate investment banker. Executive Vice President (1997 to present) of Cronheim Management Services, Inc., a real estate management firm. Executive Vice President (1989 to present) and General Counsel (1983 to present) of David Cronheim Company, a real estate brokerage firm. Executive Committee (2012 to present), Secretary-Treasurer (2013 to 2015), Vice-President (2015 to 2016) and President (2016 to present) of The Institute of Real Estate Management (IREM) Chapter One (New Jersey). Member and instructor (2014 to present) of the New Jersey State Bar Association Land Use Committee. Member (1986 to 1993) and Chairman (1994 to present) of Borough of Watchung Zoning Board. Mr. Cronheim’s extensive experience in real estate management and the mortgage industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Cronheim was selected to serve on our Board. 

  1989 I
Daniel D. Cronheim 64 Director. Attorney at Law (1979 to present).Certified Property Manager (2010 to present) from Institute of Real Estate Management (“IREM”). President (2000 to present) of David Cronheim Mortgage Corp., a privately-owned real estate investment bank. Executive Vice President (1997 to present) of Cronheim Management Services, Inc., a real estate management firm. Executive Committee (2012 to present), Secretary-Treasurer (2013-2015), Vice-President 2015-2016), and President (2016 to present) of IREM Chapter One (New Jersey). Member and instructor of the New Jersey State Bar Association Land Use Committee (2014 to present) and Legislative subcommittee chair (2018 to present). Mr. Cronheim’s extensive experience in real estate management and the mortgage industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Cronheim was selected to serve on our Board. 1989 I
              
Catherine B. Elflein  55 

Independent Director (2).Certified Public Accountant. Senior Director – Risk Management (2006 to present) at Celgene Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company; Controller of Captive Insurance Companies (2004 to 2006) and Director – Treasury Operations (1998 to 2004) at Celanese Corporation. Ms. Elflein’s extensive experience in accounting, finance and risk management is the primary reason, among others, why Ms. Elflein was selected to serve on our Board. 

  2007 III 57 Independent Director. (2) Certified Public Accountant. Senior Director – Risk Management (2006 to present) at Celgene Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company; Controller of Captive Insurance Companies (2004 to 2006) and Director – Treasury Operations (1998 to 2004) at Celanese Corporation. Ms. Elflein’s extensive experience in accounting, finance and risk management is the primary reason, among others, why Ms. Elflein was selected to serve on our Board. 2007 III

61

Name Age 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

Director

Since

 

Class

(1)

Brian H. Haimm 49 Lead Independent Director.(2) Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (2006 to present) of Ascend Capital Group International, LLC, a private equity firm. Mr. Haimm’s extensive experience in accounting, finance and the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Haimm was selected to serve on our Board. 2013 II
         
Neal Herstik 59 Independent Director. (2) Attorney at Law, Gross, Truss & Herstik, PC (1997 to present). Mr. Herstik’s extensive legal experience and experience in the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Herstik was selected to serve on our Board. 2004 II
         
Matthew I. Hirsch 59 

Independent Director. (2)Attorney at Law (1985 to present), Law Office of Matthew I. Hirsch; Adjunct Professor of Law, Delaware Law School of Widener University (1993 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH), a related company, Director (2013 to present).

 

Mr. Hirsch’s experience with real estate transactions, legal issues relating to real estate and the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Hirsch was selected to serve on our Board.

 2000 II
         
Eugene W. Landy 84 

Founder and Chairman of the Board (1968 to present), and Executive Director. President and Chief Executive Officer (1968 to April 2013). Attorney at Law. Chairman of the Board (1995 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Founder and Chairman of the Board (1969 to present), and President (1969 to 1995).

 

As our Founder and Chairman, Mr. Landy’s unparalleled experience in real estate investing is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board.

 

1968

 III

 

 62 

 

Name Age  

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

Director

Since

  

Class

Type (1)

           
Brian H. Haimm  47  

Independent Director (2).Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (2006 to present) of Ascend Capital, a private equity firm. Mr. Haimm’s extensive experience in accounting, finance and the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Haimm was selected to serve on our Board. 

  2013  II
             
Neal Herstik  57  

Independent Director (2).Attorney at Law, Gross, Truss & Herstik, PC (1997 to present). Mr. Herstik’s extensive legal experience and experience in the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Herstik was selected to serve on our Board. 

  2004  II
             
Matthew I. Hirsch  57  

Independent Director (2).Attorney at Law (1985 to present) Law Office of Matthew I. Hirsch; Adjunct Professor of Law, Delaware Law School of Widener University (1993 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Director (2013 to present).

 

Mr. Hirsch’s experience with real estate transactions, legal issues relating to real estate and the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Hirsch was selected to serve on our Board. 

  2000  II
             
Eugene W. Landy  82  

Founder and Chairman of the Board (1968 to present), President and Chief Executive Officer (1968 to April 2013) and Director.Attorney at Law. Partner of the Law Firm of Landy & Landy; Chairman of the Board (1995 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Founder and Chairman of the Board, Director (1969 to present) and President (1969 to 1995).

 

As our Founder and Chairman, Mr. Landy’s unparalleled experience in real estate investing is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board. 

  1968  III
Name Age 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

Director

Since

 

Class

(1)

Michael P. Landy 56 

President and Chief Executive Officer (April 2013 to present) and Executive Director. Chief Operating Officer (2011 to April 2013), Executive Vice President (2009 to 2010), Executive Vice President-Investments (2006 to 2009), and Vice President-Investments (2001 to 2006). Member of New York University’s REIT Center Board of Advisors (2013 to present). Member of Nareit’s Advisory Board of Governors (2018 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Director (2011 to present).

 

Mr. Landy’s role as our President and Chief Executive Officer and extensive experience in real estate finance, investment, capital markets and operations management are the primary reasons, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board.

 2007 III
         
Samuel A. Landy 58 

Director.Attorney at Law.

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, President and Chief Executive Officer (1995 to present), Vice President (1991 to 1995) and Director (1992 to present).

 

Mr. Landy’s extensive experience in real estate investment and REIT leadership is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board.

 1989 III
         

Kevin S. Miller

 

 49 Chief Financial Officer (July 2012 to present) and Chief Accounting Officer (May 2012 to present) and Executive Director. Certified Public Accountant. Assistant Controller and Assistant Vice-President (2005 to May 2012) of Forest City Ratner, a real estate developer, owner and operator and a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly-held company, Forest City Realty Trust, Inc. Mr. Miller’s extensive experience in accounting, finance and the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Miller was selected to serve on our Board. 2017 I
         
Allison Nagelberg 53 General Counsel (2000 to present).Attorney at Law (1989 to present). Ms. Nagelberg also has a Master of Business Administration in Finance. Ms. Nagelberg is a member of the Rutgers Center for Real Estate Advisory Board (2017 to present). N/A N/A

 

 63 

 

Name Age  

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

 

Director

Since

  

Class

Type

(1)

           
Michael P. Landy  54  

President and Chief Executive Officer (April 2013 to present) and Director.Chief Operating Officer (2011 to April 2013), Executive Vice President (2009 to 2010), Executive Vice President-Investments (2006 to 2009), and Vice President-Investments (2001 to 2006). Member of New York University’s REIT Center Board of Advisors (2013 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Director (2011 to present), Executive Vice President (2010 to 2012) and Vice President-Investments (2001 to 2010).

 

Mr. Landy’s role as our President and Chief Executive Officer and extensive experience in real estate finance, investment, capital markets and operations management are the primary reasons, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board. 

  2007  III
             
Samuel A. Landy  56  

Director. Attorney at Law (1985 to present), Partner of the Law firm of Landy & Landy.

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, President and Chief Executive Officer (1995 to present), Vice President (1991 to 1995) and Director (1992 to present).

 

Mr. Landy’s extensive experience in real estate investment and REIT leadership is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board. 

  1989  III
             
Kevin S. Miller
  47  

Chief Financial Officer (July 2012 to present) and Chief Accounting Officer (May 2012 to present).Certified Public Accountant. Assistant Controller and Assistant Vice-President (2005 to May 2012) of Forest City Ratner, a real estate developer, owner and operator and a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly-held company, Forest City Realty Trust, Inc

  N/A  N/A
             
Allison Nagelberg  51  

General Counsel (2000 to present).Attorney at Law (1989 to present). Ms. Nagelberg also has a Master of Business Administration in Finance.

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, General Counsel (2000 to 2013). 

  N/A  N/A

64

Name

 

 

 

Age

 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

 

Director
Since

 

Class Type

(1)

 Age 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

 Director
Since

 

Class

(1)

Gregory T. Otto 30 Independent Director. (2) Maritime Professional (2011 to present) with experiences in commerce, maritime security, and intermodal logistics. Consultant for Entegra Systems (2018 to present), focused on maritime business and security services. Port Operations Coordinator and Merchant Marine Deck Officer for Maersk Line (2011 to 2014). Lieutenant in the U.S. Naval Reserves (2011 to present), specializing in maritime intelligence. Mr. Otto’s experience in commerce, global markets, and intermodal logistics is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Otto was selected to serve on our Board. 2017 I
                
Scott Robinson  46  Independent Director (2). Managing Director, Oberon Securities (2013 to Present); Clinical Professor of Finance and Director of the The REIT Center at New York University (2008 to Present); Managing Partner, Cadence Capital Group (2009 to 2013); Vice President, Citigroup (2006 to 2008); Senior REIT and CMBS analyst (1998 to 2006), Standard & Poor’s. Mr. Robinson’s extensive experience in real estate finance and investment is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Robinson was selected to serve on our Board.  2005  I
Scott L. Robinson 48 Independent Director. (2) Managing Director, Oberon Securities (2013 to Present); Clinical Professor of Finance and Director of The REIT Center at New York University (2008 to Present); Managing Partner, Cadence Capital Group (2009 to 2013); Vice President, Citigroup (2006 to 2008); Senior REIT and CMBS analyst (1998 to 2006), Standard & Poor’s. Mr. Robinson’s extensive experience in real estate finance and investment is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Robinson was selected to serve on our Board. 2005 I
                  
Stephen B. Wolgin  62  

Lead Independent Director (2).Managing Director of U.S. Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (2000 to present), a real estate advisory services group based in New Jersey. Partner with the Logan Asset Backed Fund, LP (2007 to present). Prior affiliations with J.P. Morgan, Odyssey Associates, The Prudential Realty Group, Standard & Poor’s Corporation, and Grubb and Ellis.

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Director (2007 to present).

 

Mr. Wolgin’s extensive experience as a real estate and finance consultant and experience in the real estate industry are the primary reasons, among others, why Mr. Wolgin was selected to serve on our Board. 

  2003  II 64 

Independent Director. (2) Managing Director of U.S. Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (2000 to present), a real estate advisory services group based in New Jersey. Prior Partner with the Logan Asset Backed Fund, LP (2007 to 2017). Prior affiliations with J.P. Morgan, Odyssey Associates, The Prudential Realty Group, Standard & Poor’s Corporation, and Grubb and Ellis.

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Director (2007 to present).

 

Mr. Wolgin’s extensive experience in real estate finance and investment are the primary reasons, among others, why Mr. Wolgin was selected to serve on our Board.

 2003 II

 

 (1)Class I, II, and III Directors have terms expiring at the annual meetings of the Company’sour shareholders to be held in 2019, 20172020 and 2018,2021, respectively, and when their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.
 (2)Independent within the meaning of applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards and SEC rules.

 

All officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors, subject to the rights, if any, of any officer under any employment contract. Officers are elected by the Board of Directors annually and as may be appropriate to fill a vacancy in an office.

 

With the addition of Mr. Conway to our Board of Directors on September 13, 2018, we have increased our percentage of independent directors from approximately 58% to 62%.

64

Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships between any of the directors or executive officers, with the exception of Samuel A. Landy and Michael P. Landy who are the sons of the Company’sour Founder, Eugene W. Landy, who is the Chairman of the Board and a Director of the Company.an Executive Director.

 

Audit Committee

 

The Company hasWe have a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3 (a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)). Thewhose members of the audit committee are Brian H. Haimm (Chairman), Catherine B. Elflein, Stephen B. Wolgin, Matthew I. Hirsch and Scott L. Robinson. The Company’sOur Board has determined that Brian H. Haimm, Catherine B. Elflein, Scott L. Robinson and Stephen B. Wolgin are audit committee financial experts and that all members of the audit committee are independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE. The audit committee operates under the Audit Committee Charter, which can be found at the Company’sour website at www.mreic.reit.www.mreic.reit. The charter is reviewed annually for adequacy.

 

65

Compensation Committee

 

We have a separately-designated standing compensation committee, consisting of three of our independent directors: Brian H. Haimm (Chairman), Matthew I. Hirsch and Gregory T. Otto. Our Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee operates under the Compensation Committee Charter, which can be found at our website atwww.mreic.reit. The Compensation Committee charter is reviewed annually for adequacy. The role of the Compensation Committee is discussed in greater detail below in the section on Executive Compensation.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

We have a separately-designated standing nominating and corporate governance committee, consisting of three of our independent directors: Matthew I. Hirsch (Chairman), Gregory T. Otto and Stephen B. Wolgin. Our Board has determined that all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, which can be found at our website atwww.mreic.reit. The charter is reviewed annually for adequacy. Among its other responsibilities, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and evaluates candidates to be nominated as directors, which may include candidates put forward by shareholders. Qualifications considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in evaluating nominees include, but are not limited to, a candidate’s judgment, skill, experience with businesses and organizations comparable to the Company, the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members, the candidate’s independence according to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, diversity, and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board and any of its committees.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

There have been no delinquent filersfilings pursuant to Item 405 of regulation S-K, to the best of management’s knowledge.

 

Code of Ethics

 

The Company hasWe have adopted the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to itsour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as the Company’sour other officers, directors and employees (the “Code(Code of Ethics”)Ethics). The Code of Ethics can be found at the Company’sour website at www.mreic.reit.www.mreic.reit. The Code of Ethics is also available in print to any person without charge who requests a copy by writing or telephoning us at the following address and telephone number: Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, Attention: Stockholder Relations, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-D, Juniper Business Plaza, Freehold, New Jersey 07728, (732) 577-9996. The CompanyWe will satisfy any disclosure requirements under Item 5.05(c) of Form 8-K regarding a waiver from any provision of the Code of Ethics for principal officers or directors by disclosing the nature of such amendment of waiver on our website.website atwww.mreic.reit.

65

Corporate Governance Materials

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are published on the Corporate Governance page of the Investor Relations section on our website atwww.mreic.reit. (We are not including the other information contained on, or available through, our website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this 10-K. Such information includes, but is not limited to, our Commitment to Environment and Society and our Vendor Code of Conduct.)

 

ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following table highlights important aspects of our executive compensation program, which promote good governance and serve the interests of our shareholders.

Highlights
Cash bonus program for Chairman and CEO tied to objective financial performance goals
Total executive compensation for our Named Executive Officers is within the lowest 25th percentile in the REIT industry for REITS with comparable data based upon the 2018 NAREIT Compensation Survey
Clawback policy

Robust stock ownership guidelines:

● CEO: 6x base salary

● Other Named Executive Officers: 2x base salary

● Directors: 3x annual cash fee

● Named Executive Officers retain (for a minimum of 24 months) at least 50% of the shares received upon vesting of restricted stock or the exercise of stock options (net of any shares sold or forfeited for payment of exercise price, tax or withholding)

Annual say-on-pay vote
Compensation Committee has considered the report of an independent compensation consultant
No excessive perquisites or other benefits
No repricing or buyout of stock options
No excise tax gross-ups
Average total Director compensation is approximately half of the average total director compensation of Comparable REITs (as defined below)

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Overview of Compensation Program

 

The Compensation Committee (for purposes of this analysis,Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the “Committee”) of the Board has been appointed to implement and exercise the Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of the Company’sour executive officers.officers and directors. The Committee has the overall responsibility for evaluating and approving and evaluating theour executive officer compensation plan, policies and programs, of the Company.and does not delegate this responsibility to any other person(s). The Committee’s primary objectives include serving as an independent and objective party to review such compensation plan, policies and programs. The CompensationTo assist in the process, the Committee has, notfrom time to time, retained or obtained the advice of a compensation committee consultant for determining or recommendingas outlined below in the amountsection entitled Engagement of executive or director compensation.Compensation Consultant.

66

 

Throughout this report, the individuals who served as the Company’sour Chairman of the Board, and the President and Chief Executive Officer and other Officers during fiscal 2016officers included in the Summary Compensation Table presented below in Item 11 of this report, are sometimes referred to in this report as the named executive officers.Named Executive Officers.

Since 1968, we have delivered consistent and reliable returns for our shareholders. Over the last 10 years, we have outperformed the MSCI US REIT Index by a wide margin of approximately three times. Our total shareholder return (TSR) over the last 10 fiscal years through September 30, 2018 was 303% as compared to 106% for the MSCI US REIT Index during the same period. TSR includes both dividends reinvested and stock price appreciation. Historically, REIT dividends have accounted for approximately 65% of total shareholder return. We believe that it is essential that dividends be factored into evaluating a REIT’s economic performance. Our dividend has proven to be very reliable because our industrial properties are predominantly subject to long-term net leases to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries. In view of the substantial progress made by us during fiscal year 2017, on October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved a 6.3% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.17 per share from $0.16 per share. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.68 per share. This increase was the second dividend increase within two years. The prior dividend increase was on October 1, 2015, at which time our Board of Directors approved a 6.7% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.16 per share from $0.15 per share. These two dividend raises represent a total increase of 13%. We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 27 consecutive years. We are one of the few REITs that maintained our dividend throughout the Global Financial Crisis. We are also one of the few REITs that is paying out a higher per share dividend today than prior to the Global Financial Crisis.

The following charts illustrate our outperformance over a 10-year period as compared to the S&P 500 Index and the MSCI US REIT Index for the same period and our outperformance over a 1-year period as compared to the MSCI US REIT Index for the same period:

 

67

The following chart illustrates our growth in Capital Structure over the last five years:

 

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Committee believes that a well-designed compensation program should align the goalsinterests of the President and ChiefNamed Executive OfficerOfficers with the goalsinterests of the shareholders, and that a significant part of the executives’ compensation, over the long term, should be dependent upon the value created for shareholders. In addition, all executives should be held accountable through their compensation for theour performance of the Company, and compensation levels should also reflect the executives’ individual performance in an effort to encourage increased individual contributions to the Company’sour performance. TheThis compensation philosophy, as reflected in the Company’sour employment agreements with itsour executives and the overall compensation program, is designed to motivate our executives to focus on operating results and create long-term shareholder value by:

 establishing a plancompensation program that attracts, retains and motivates executives through compensation that is competitive with a peer group of othercomparable publicly-traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs;
   
 rewarding executives for individual accomplishments and achievements;
   
 linking a portion of each executive’s compensation to the achievement of the Company’sour business plan by using measurements of the Company’sour operating results and shareholder return; and
   
 building a pay-for-performance systemprogram that encourages and rewards successful initiatives within a team environment.

 

66

The salaries and bonuses in the Company’s recently executedour executive employment agreements are consistent with the Committee’s philosophy and objectives.

 

The Committee believes that each of the above factors is important when determining compensation levels for named executive officers.Named Executive Officers. The Committee reviews and approves the employment contracts for the Chairman of the Board, and the President and Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers, includingNamed Executive Officers, and reviews and approves the performance goals and objectives.objectives applicable to their performance-based compensation. The Committee annually evaluates the performance of the executive officersNamed Executive Officers in light of those goals and objectives. The Committee considers the Company’sour performance, relative shareholder return, the total compensation provided to comparable officers at similarly-situated companies, and compensation given toearned by the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers in prior years. The Company uses the annual Compensation Survey published by NAREIT (the “Survey”) as a guide to setting compensation levels. Participant company data is not presented in a manner that specifically identifies any named individual or company. This Survey details compensation by position type and company size with statistical salary and bonus information for each position. The sub-sets presented in the Survey used by the Committee for comparison are the industrial property sector, entities with less than $1.5 billion in equity market capitalization and entities with less than 75 full-time employees. The Compensation Committee compares the Company’s salary and bonus amounts to the ranges presented for reasonableness.

68

The Committee believes that the executive compensation packages provided by the Companythat we provide to its executive officersour Named Executive Officers should include both base salaries and annual bonus awards that reward corporate and individual performance, as well as give incentives to executives to meet or exceed established goals. As a result, an important portion of the Company’sour compensation program is comprised of discretionary bonuses and equity awards as determined by the Committee in recognition of individual accomplishments and achievements.achievements, as well as overall company performance.

Historically, the Committee has used the annual Compensation Survey published by NAREIT (Survey) as a guide to setting compensation levels. Total executive compensation paid by us fell within the lowest range (25th percentile) within the REIT industry for REITs with comparable data based upon the 2018 Compensation Survey published by NAREIT. Participant company data is not presented within the Survey in a manner that specifically identifies any named individual or company. This Survey details compensation by position type and company size with statistical salary and bonus information for each position. The subsets presented in the Survey which the Committee also uses for comparison purposes are the industrial property sector, entities with a total market capitalization between $1.5 billion and $3.0 billion and entities with less than 75 full-time employees. The Committee compares our salary and bonus amounts to the ranges presented in this Survey for reasonableness.

During the last quarter of fiscal 2017, the Committee engaged FPL Associates (FPL), a nationally recognized compensation consulting firm specializing in the REIT industry, to provide market-based compensation data and to advise the Committee on industry trends and best practices. As a result of the compensation analysis, the Committee is exploring the possibility of providing for a greater percentage of total compensation for our Named Executive Officers to be paid in the form of performance-based equity.

 

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

 

The Committee makesrecommends to the Board all final compensation decisions for the Company’s named executive officers.with respect to our Named Executive Officers. The Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer review the performance of the other named executive officersNamed Executive Officers and then present their conclusions and recommendations to the Committee with respect to base salary adjustments, and annual cash bonusbonuses and stock optionoptions or restricted stock awards. The Committee exercises its own discretion in modifying and implementing any recommended adjustments or awards but does consider the recommendations from management who work closely with the other named executive officers.Named Executive Officers.

Role of Grants of Stock Options and Restricted Stock in Compensation Analysis

 

The Committee views the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards as a form of long-term compensation. The Committee believes that such grants promote the Company’sour goal of retaining key employees and align the key employees’ interests with those of the Company’sour shareholders from a long-term perspective. The number of options or shares of restricted stock granted to each employee, and the performance or time-based vesting criteria associated with each grant, is determined by consideration of various factors including but not limited to the employees’employee’s contribution, title, responsibilities, and years of service. The Committee takes outstanding awards of stock options and restricted stock into account in making its compensation determinations.

Role of Employment Agreements in Determining Executive Compensation

 

Each of the Company’sour currently employed named executive officersNamed Executive Officers is a party to an employment agreement. These agreements provide forestablish the base salaries, bonuses and customary fringe benefits.benefits for each Named Executive Officer. The key elementsemployment agreements also provide for certain severance benefits in the event the Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated. The employment agreements also provide for certain severance benefits in the event of a change in control and to alleviate the Company’s compensation program for the named executive officers arefinancial impact of termination of employment, through base salary bonuses, stock options and other benefits,including those providedhealth benefit continuation with the intention of providing for under the employment agreements and additional discretionary bonuses awarded by the Committee in recognition of individual accomplishments and achievements.Each of these is addressed separately below.a stable work environment. In determining initial compensation, as incorporated into the employment agreements, the Committee considers all elements of a named executive officer’sNamed Executive Officer’s total compensation package in comparison to current market practices and other benefits. In reviewing and setting compensation for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee takes the terms of the employment agreements into consideration.

69

 

Shareholder Advisory Vote

 

One way to determine if the Company’sour compensation program reflects the interests of shareholders is through their non-binding vote.advisory vote on our executive compensation practices. At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 13, 2014,17, 2018, approximately 92% of votes cast (excluding broker non-votes) were voted in favor of our Say-On-Pay proposal, which we believe affirms our shareholders’ support of our approach to our executive compensation program.

We provide our shareholders with the Company’s shareholders approved by theiropportunity to vote annually on the advisory voteapproval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay proposal). The Committee will continue to consider the namedoutcome of our Say-on-Pay proposals when making future compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.

Engagement of Compensation Consultant

Pursuant to its charter, the Committee is authorized to retain the services of an executive compensation advisor, in its discretion, to assist with the establishment and review of our compensation programs and related policies. The Committee did not retain a compensation consultant for prior years because the Committee determined that the Survey and other information available to it provided comprehensive information regarding executive compensation levels and structure. In August 2017, the Committee engaged FPL to provide additional market-based compensation data and to advise on industry trends and best practices. In order to help the Committee fairly evaluate our executive compensation in light of our relative economic performance, FPL prepared for the Committee a peer group of REITs with similar total capitalization, ranging between $1.4 billion and $4.0 billion (approximately 0.7x-2.0x Monmouth’s total capitalization at that time), and/or REITs that operate within the industrial REIT sector and with whom we compete for executive employees.

The peer group of comparable REITs (Comparable REITS) identified by FPL are as follows:

Agree Realty Corporation

EastGroup Properties*

Getty Realty Corporation

Hersha Hospitality Trust

LTC Properties, Inc.

Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.*

STAG Industrial, Inc.*

Terreno Realty Corporation*

TIER REIT, Inc.

Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc.

*Denotes a peer that is in the Industrial sector

FPL compared our aggregate pay and performance to those of our peers over the prior three-year period. Based upon this analysis, FPL concluded that our aggregate pay at that time ranked at the lowest end of the aggregate pay provided by our peers, and that our performance by Total Shareholder Return was at the highest end of performance of our peers.

The Committee used this data as one tool in considering compensation for our Named Executive Officers for compensation decisions beginning in fiscal 2018. Information about peers includes but is not limited to: base salaries, annual bonuses, long-term equity incentives, composition ranges by position, governance practices, market trends and industry performance. The peer group compensation analyses prepared by FPL have been utilized by the Compensation Committee for informational purposes only and have not been, and will not be utilized for benchmarking purposes as we do not have formal benchmarking policies for comparing to our peers or the market. The Compensation Committee’s executive compensation determinations are subjective and the result of the Compensation Committee’s business judgment, which is informed by peer group data provided by FPL and will continue to be informed by the experiences of the members of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee ultimately uses its own judgment in making final decisions regarding the compensation paid to our executive officers.

 

 6770 

 

Other than advising the Committee as described above, FPL did not provide any other services to us. The Committee has sole authority to hire, terminate and set the terms of engagement with FPL. The Committee has considered the independence of FPL, consistent with the requirements of NYSE, and has determined that FPL is independent. Further, pursuant to SEC rules, the Committee conducted a conflicts of interest assessment and determined that there are no conflicts of interest resulting from retaining FPL. FPL does not provide any services to our management and has no prior relationship with us prior to its engagement by the Committee. The Committee intends to reassess the independence of FPL or any other compensation consultant retained by the Committee at least annually.

Elements of Executive Officer Compensation

In addition to its determination of the Named Executives’ individual performance levels for fiscal 2018, the Committee compared the Named Executives’ total compensation for fiscal 2018 to that of similarly-situated personnel of other comparably sized REITs as noted in the report provided by FPL. Furthermore, the Committee compared the Named Executives’ total compensation for 2018 to that within the REIT industry in the Survey described above. For fiscal 2018, our total compensation fell within the lowest range (25th percentile) within the REIT industry for REITS with comparable data in the Survey described above.

Our executive compensation structure includes the following objectives and core features:

Base Salaries

 

Base salaries are the principal fixed component of a Named Executive Officer’s compensation and are paid for performance of ongoing performanceday-to-day job responsibilities throughout the year. In order to compete for and retain talented executives who are critical to the Company’sour long-term success, the Committee has determined that the base salaries of named executive officersNamed Executive Officers should approximate those of executives of other equity REITs that compete with the Companyus for employees, investors and business, while also taking into account the named executive officers’Named Executive Officers’ performance and tenure, and the Company’sour performance relative to the performance reported for companies in the industrial property sector, entities with less thantotal market capitalization between $1.5 billion in equity market capitalizationand $3.0 billion and entities with less than 75 full-time employees within the REIT industry in the Survey described above.

 

Bonuses

Performance-based Cash Bonus Awards

 

In addition to the provisions for base salaries under the terms of their employment agreements and discretionary cash bonuses awarded by the Committee in recognition of individual accomplishments and achievements, the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer are entitled to receive annual cash bonuses for each year during the terms of each respective employment agreement provided certain performance goals set by the Committee as described below are achieved.

 

For the Chairman of the Board:

 

Growth in market cap  7.5%  12.5%  20%
Bonus $20,000  $45,000  $90,000 
             
Growth in FFO/share  7.5%  12.5%  20%
Bonus $20,000  $45,000  $90,000 
             
Growth in dividend/share  5%  10%  15%
Bonus $30,000  $60,000  $120,000 
             
Maximum Bonus Potential $300,000         

 

For the President and Chief Executive Officer (effective through September 30, 2016):

Growth in market cap  10%  15%  20%
Bonus $20,000  $40,000  $60,000 
             
Growth in AFFO/share  15%  20%  25%
Bonus (1) $20,000  $45,000  $90,000 
             
Growth in dividend/share  5%  10%  15%
Bonus $30,000  $60,000  $120,000 
             
Maximum Bonus Potential $270,000         

(1)Provided that FFO is in excess of the dividend

 6871 

 

For the President and Chief Executive Officer (effective October 1, 2016):Officer:

 

Growth in market cap      10%  15%  20%      10%  15%  20%
Bonus     $40,000  $60,000  $80,000      $40,000  $60,000  $80,000 
                                
Growth in AFFO/share  5%  10%  15%  20%  5%  10%  15%  20%
Bonus (2)(1) $50,000  $75,000  $100,000  $150,000  $50,000  $75,000  $100,000  $150,000 
                                
Growth in dividend/share  5%  10%  15%      5%  10%  15%    
Bonus $150,000  $200,000  $250,000      $150,000  $200,000  $250,000     
                                
Maximum Bonus Potential $480,000              $480,000             
                                

 

 (2)(1)Provided that FFO is equal to or in excess of the dividend

 

Based on meeting the performance targets set forth above, a $210,000 cash bonus for theOur Chairman of the Board was accrued as of September 30, 2016, which was paid in October 2016 andearned a $95,000 cash bonus for fiscal 2018 based on meeting the performance targets set forth above, a $135,000 cash bonus was accrued for theour growth in market cap, growth in FFO/share and growth in dividend/share, and our President and Chief Executive Officer as of September 30, 2016, which was paidearned a $290,000 cash bonus for fiscal 2018 based on our growth in October 2016.market cap, growth in AFFO/share and growth in dividend/share.

 

In addition to its determination of the executives’ individual performance levels for 2016, the Committee compared the executives’ total compensation for 2016 to that of similarly-situated personnel of other comparably sized REIT’s. Furthermore, the Committee compared the executives’ total compensation for 2016 to that within the REIT industry in the Survey described above. For fiscal 2016, the Company’s total compensation fell in the lowest range (25th percentile) within the REIT industry in the Survey described above.Discretionary Cash Bonus Awards

 

The Committee considers and approves discretionary cash bonuses to be awarded tofor the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer.Officer annually. Discretionary cash bonuses awarded to the other named executive officersNamed Executive Officers are recommendedbased on recommendations made annually by the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer, which are then considered and are approved by the Committee.Committee in its discretion. The Committee believes that short-term rewards in the form of discretionary cash bonuses to senior executives generally should reflect short-term results and should take into consideration both the profitability and our performance of the Company and the performance of the individual, which may include comparing such individual’s performance to that in the preceding year, reviewing the breadth and nature of the senior executives’executive’s responsibilities and valuing special contributions by each such individual. In evaluating theour performance annually, for purposes of the Company annually,discretionary cash bonuses, the Committee considers a variety of factors, including, among others, Funds From Operations (FFO), Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO), net income, growth in asset size, amount of space under lease and total return to shareholders. The Company considersWe consider FFO to be an important measure of an equity REIT’s operating performance and hashave adopted the definition suggested by NAREIT, which defines FFO to mean net income computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization. The Company definesWe define AFFO as FFO plus acquisition costs and costs associated with the Redemption of Preferred Stock less recurring capital expenditures and excluding the following: lease termination income, gains or losses on securities transactions, stockstock-based compensation expense, amortization of financing and leasing commission costs, depreciation of corporate office tenant improvements, straight-line rent adjustments and non-recurring other expense. The Company considersWe consider FFO and AFFO to be meaningful additional measures of operating performance, primarily because they exclude the assumption that the value of itsour real estate assets diminishes predictably over time and because industry analysts have accepted these as performance measures.

 

Other factors considered include the employee’s title and years of service. The employee’s title generally reflects the employee’s responsibilities and the employee’s years of service may be considered in determining the level of discretionary cash bonus in comparison to base salary. The Committee has declined in the past to use specific performance formulas with respect to the cash bonuses awarded to the other named executive officers,Named Executive Officers, believing that with respect to Companyour performance, such formulas do not adequately account for many factors, including, among others, theour relative performance of the Company compared to itsour competitors during variations in the economic cycle, and that with respect to individual performance, such formulas are not a substitute for the subjective evaluation by the Committee of a wide range of management and leadership skills of each of the senior executives.

 

69

In setting discretionary bonuses for fiscal 2016,2018, the Committee considered the performance of the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer and received the recommendations from the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer for the discretionary cash bonuses to be awarded to the other named executive officers.Named Executive Officers. The factors that wereCommittee also considered management’s report on our progress toward our fiscal 2018 achievements in awardingfinancial performance and strategic growth, and the discretionary cash bonuses included the following progress that was made by the Company due to the effortsrole of management:each Named Executive Officer in delivering these achievements:

On October 1, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 6.7% increase in the Company’s quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.16 per share from $0.15 per share, representing an annualized dividend rate of $0.64 per share resulting in the Company being able to maintain or increase its cash dividend for twenty-five consecutive years.
Achieved $1.8 billion in total market capitalization resulting in year over year growth of 53% in fiscal 2016
Achieved a 46% total shareholder return for fiscal 2016
Achieved over 16.0 million total rentable square feet resulting in year over year growth of 15% in fiscal 2016
Generated 23% year over year AFFO per diluted share growth in fiscal 2016. AFFO per diluted share growth has been over 10% for three consecutive years
Located and acquired eight industrial properties totaling approximately 1,830,000 square feet as per its investment strategy without placing undue burden on liquidity
During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014, 2015 and 2016, completed fifteen property expansions totaling $52.5 million, generating over $5.2 million in additional rental revenue and subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2016 completed one additional property expansion for $5.0 million which will generate additional rental revenue of approximately $500,000
Entered into commitments to acquire nine industrial properties in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018 of which one was acquired subsequent to the fiscal yearend
On September 13, 2016 closed and priced a very successful new perpetual preferred offering at 6.125% which was over-subscribed, raising $135 million in gross proceeds
Raised approximately $72.2 million through the DRIP during fiscal 2016
Renewed all three leases that were scheduled to expire in fiscal 2016, resulting in a 100% tenant retention rate and on terms resulting in an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 5.3% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis
Achieved 99.6% occupancy as of September 30, 2016, increasing to 100% with the sale of the Company’s only vacant building on October 28, 2016
Increased and extended the unsecured revolving credit facility from $130 million to $200 million with a $100 million accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability to $300 million
Managed general and administrative costs to an appropriate level

 7072 

Financial Performance

Growth in Market Capitalization: Achieved $2.5 billion in total market capitalization as of September 30, 2018, resulting in year over year growth of 17% for fiscal 2018.
Growth in Total Shareholder Return: Achieved an 8% total shareholder return for fiscal 2018, versus 4% return from the MSCI US REIT Index during the same period.
Growth in Gross Leasable Area: Achieved 13% year over year growth in gross leasable area for fiscal 2018, with 21.2 million total rentable square feet as of September 30, 2018.
Growth in Net Income per Diluted Share: Generated 53% year over year per diluted share growth in Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders for fiscal 2018.
Growth in AFFO per Diluted Share*: Generated 14% year over year growth in adjusted funds from operation (AFFO) per diluted share for fiscal 2018.
Dividend Increase: On October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved a 6.25% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.17 per share from $0.16 per share. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.68 per share. We have maintained or increased our dividend for 27 consecutive years.

Strategic Growth

Property Acquisitions: Located and acquired seven, brand new, Class A industrial properties in fiscal 2018, totaling approximately 2.7 million square feet, without placing undue burden on liquidity.
Property Expansions: Completed two property expansions during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, totaling $3.5 million, generating over $367,000 in additional rental revenue and extending the lease maturity 10 years from the date of each completed expansion.
Commitments to Acquire Property: Entered into agreements to acquire three, brand new, Class A industrial properties in fiscal 2018, totaling approximately 745,000 square feet, of which one property was acquired subsequent to fiscal yearend.
At-The-Market Transaction: On June 29, 2017, we entered into the Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program under which we were able to offer and sell shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000 of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock. Since inception through September 30, 2018, we sold 3,088,001 shares under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000, of which 1,648,556 shares were sold during the fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $40,094,000.
Capital Raising through DRIP: Raised approximately $90.0 million through our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP) during fiscal 2018.
Tenant Occupancy: Achieved 99.6% occupancy as of September 30, 2018.
Controlled General and Administrative Expense: Managed G&A costs to an appropriate level. G&A expenses, as a percentage of gross revenue decreased by 8% to 5.8% and G&A as a percentage of undepreciated assets decreased by 4% to 46 basis points for fiscal 2018.

*AFFO is a non-GAAP performance measure. See Financial Information on page 31 for a discussion of our non-GAAP performance measures.

73

 

After considering our progress towards our fiscal 2018 financial performance and strategic growth achievements, as outlined above, as well as the individual performance of the Chairman of the Board, and the President and Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers, and the recommendations of the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer as to the other named executive officers,Named Executive Officers, the Committee allocatedestablished the individual discretionary cash bonus tobonuses for the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers based on our overall performance and the named executive officers’Named Executive Officers’ individual contributions to these accomplishments. Other factors considered in this allocationdetermining individual bonus amounts included the named executive officers’Named Executive Officers’ responsibilities and years of service. During fiscal 2016,2018, the Chairman of the Board received a discretionary cash bonus of $65,769. During fiscal 2016,$95,615, the President and Chief Executive Officer received a discretionary cash bonusesbonus of $501,202 which includes$160,577, the Chief Financial and Accounting Officer received a $400,000discretionary cash signing bonus in accordance with his amendedof $141,250 and restated Employment Agreement entered into on January 11, 2016.the General Counsel received a discretionary cash bonus of $92,500.

 

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

In part based on market-based compensation data and information on industry trends and best practices received from FPL, the Committee is considering providing for a greater percentage of total compensation for our Named Executive Officers to be paid in the form of performance-based equity and is exploring the possibility of developing a long-term performance-based equity compensation plan. All grants of equity will be made pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2007 Incentive Award Plan, which was approved by our shareholders on May 18, 2017.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock

 

The employment agreement for the Chairman of the Board states that he will receive stock options to purchase 65,000 shares of stock annually. The employment agreement for the President and Chief Executive Officer states that he will be entitled to equity awards of up to 25,000 shares of restricted stock each year based on achievement of performance objectives as determined by the Compensation Committee.Committee including, but not limited to, AFFO per share growth, acquisitions and total return performance. In addition, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to make additional awards of stock options and restricted stock for outstanding performance. In recognition of Mr. Eugene Landy’s extraordinary contributions to the Company over the last five decades and, in particular, over the last year, on September 14, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved and granted a discretionary award of 40,000 shares of restricted common stock. The stock, which will vest in equal annual instalments over the next five years, has a grant date fair value of $13.64 per share, for a total grant date fair value of $545,600. When awarding these shares of restricted stock, the Compensation Committee took into account Mr. Eugene Landy’s recent contributions towards the progress that the Company made considered by the Committee in awarding discretionary cash bonuses, as further detailed above, under the heading “Bonuses”.

 

For the other senior executives,Named Executive Officers, the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer make a recommendation to the Committee offor specific stock optionoptions or restricted stock grants. In making its decisions, the Committee does not use an established formula or focus on a specific performance target. The Committee recognizes that often outside forces beyond the control of management, such as economic conditions, changing leasing and real estate markets and other factors, may contribute to less favorable near termnear-term results even when sound strategic decisions have been made by the senior executives to position the CompanyMonmouth for longer term profitability. Thus, the Committee also attempts to identify whether the senior executives are exercising the kind of judgment and making the types of decisions that will lead to future growth and enhanced asset value, even if the same are difficult to measure on a current basis. For example, in determining appropriate stock option and restricted stock awards, the Committee considers, among other matters, whether the senior executives have executed strategies that will provide adequate funding or appropriate borrowing capacity for future growth, whether acquisition and leasing strategies have been developed to ensure a future stream of reliable and increasing revenues for the Company,Monmouth, whether the selection of properties, tenants and tenant mix evidence appropriate risk management, including risks associated with real estate markets and tenant credit, and whether the administration of staff size and compensation appropriately balances theour current and projected operating requirements of the Company with the need to effectively control overhead costs, while continuing to grow the enterprise. NoOther than the equity awards required to be paid to our Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to their employment agreement and amounts awarded to Named Executive Officers who are also directors as part of our Director Compensation Plan, no equity awards were made to other named executive officersNamed Executive Officers during fiscal 2016.2018.

 

74

Other Personal Benefits

The Company’sOur employment agreements provide the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers with other personal benefits that the Companywe and the Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program to better enable the Companyus to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The Committee periodically reviews the levels of other personal benefits provided to the named executive officers.Named Executive Officers.

71

 

The named executive officersNamed Executive Officers are provided the following benefits under the terms of their employment agreements: an allotted number of paid vacation weeks; eligibility for the executive, as well as spouse and dependents where applicable, in all Companyour sponsored employee benefits plans, including 401(k) plan, group health, accident, and life insurance, on terms no less favorable than applicable to any other executive; and supplemental disability insurance, at the Company’s cost, as agreed to by the Company and the named executive officer.our cost. Attributed costs of the personal benefits described above for the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016,2018, are included in “All Other Compensation” of the Summary Compensation Table provided below under Item 11 of this report.

 

Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

 

In addition, the named executive officers’Named Executive Officers’ employment agreements each contain provisions relating to change in control events. The employment agreements also contain severance or continuation of salary payments upon any termination of the named executive officers’Named Executive Officers’ employment, except in the case of Mr. Miller or Ms. Nagelberg, whose severance payments are for eventsonly upon a termination other than for cause (as defined under the terms of the employment agreements). These change in control and severance terms have been deemed reasonable by the Compensation Committee.Committee based on the tenure and performance of each Named Executive Officer. Information regarding these provisions is included in “Employment Agreements” provided below in this Annual Report. There are no other agreements or arrangements governing change in control payments.

 

Evaluation

Mr. Eugene Landy is employed under an Amended Employment Agreement with the Company. In January 2016, based on the Committee’s evaluation of his performance, his base compensation under his amended contract was increased from $410,000 to $430,500 per year.

 

In evaluating Mr. Eugene W. Landy’s and Mr. Michael P. Landy’s eligibility for an annual bonus,cash bonuses, the Committee used the bonus schedule included in Mr. Eugene Landy’stheir respective Amended Employment AgreementAgreements as a guide.

In recognition of Mr. Eugene Landy’s extraordinary contributions to the Company over the last five decadesguide and, in particular, overconsidering discretionary cash bonuses for all Named Executive Officers, considered the last year, as well as his contributions toward the Company’s progress as furtherfactors detailed above under the heading “Bonuses”, on September 14, 2016, the Compensation Committee determined to grant to Mr. Landy 40,000 shares of restricted common stock. The restricted stock, which will vest in equal annual installments over the next five years, has a grant date fair value of $13.64 per share, for a total grant date fair value of $545,600. In evaluating Mr. Eugene Landy’s eligibility for an annual bonus, the Compensation Committee used the bonus schedule included in Mr. Eugene Landy’s employment agreement as a guide and, in addition, considered the factors as further detailed above, under the heading “Bonuses” in considering Mr. Eugene Landy’s eligibility for a discretionary cash bonus.“Bonuses.”

72

 

The Compensation Committee also reviewed the progress made by Mr. Michael P. Landy, President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as his contributions toward the progress that the Company haswe had made that enabled the Companyus to reach the milestones as further detailed above,discussed under the heading “Bonuses”. above. Mr. Michael Landy is employed under an employment agreement with the Company.us. His base compensation under this contract was $551,250 for fiscal 2016. Effectiveincreased effective October 1, 2016 Mr. Landy’s annual base compensation was increased to $750,000 and will increase by 5% each year through fiscal 2021. The amended employment agreement has an initial term of five years and is renewed automatically for a new five-year term on the first day of each calendar quarter after the effective date unless otherwise terminated, and contains provisions for continuation of salary payments through the expiration of the term of the agreement upon any termination of the Mr. Landy’s employment. Upon execution of the amended employment agreement in January 2016, Mr. Landy received a cash signing bonus of $400,000 in recognition of the substantial progress that the Company haswe have made under his leadership. InDuring 2016, when considering the new employment agreement and signing bonus, the Compensation Committee took into account the transformative changes that Company has enjoyed over the past several years, which include the Company’s total market capitalization growing more than three-fold since fiscal 2010, and the company’s total assets nearly tripling as well since that time, while the Company’s general and administrative expenses only doubled over this period. In evaluating Mr. Michael Landy’s eligibility for an annual bonus,Since fiscal 2010 through fiscal 2018, our total market capitalization has grown by approximately 5.0x and our total assets have grown by approximately 4.0x, while our G&A expenses increased by only 2.3x over this period.

All Named Executive Officers were awarded their respective compensation based on their respective Employment Agreements and the Compensation Committee used the bonus schedule included in Mr. Michael Landy’s employment agreementmany contributions that they have made towards our progress, as a guide and, in addition, considered the factors discussedfurther detailed above, under the heading “Bonuses” in considering Mr. Michael Landy’s eligibility for a discretionary cash bonus.

. The Committee has also approvedconsidered the recommendations of the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer concerning the other named executive officers’Named Executive Officers’ annual salaries, bonuses, and fringe benefits.

 

75

Effective January 1, 2016, Mr. Miller’s annual base

Clawback Policy

In October 2017, the Committee adopted a clawback policy that provides that in the event of a material restatement of our financial results, other than a restatement caused by a change in applicable accounting rules or interpretations, the Committee will review the performance-based compensation was increasedof our Named Executive Officers, as defined in our Proxy Statement from $242,550year to $360,000year, for the calendar year ending December 31, 2016,three years prior to such material restatement. If the Committee determines that the amount of any performance-based compensation actually paid or awarded to a Named Executive Officer (Awarded Compensation) would have been lower if it had been calculated based on such restated financial statements (Actual Compensation) and will increase by 5% each calendar year through December 31, 2018. Mr. Miller’s employment agreement was also amendedthat such executive officer engaged in actual fraud or willful unlawful misconduct that materially contributed to provide that, upon a change of controlthe need for the restatement, then the Committee may direct us to recoup the after-tax portion of the Company, Mr. Miller may extenddifference between the Awarded Compensation and renew the amended employment agreementActual Compensation for three years from the dateNamed Executive Officers. The Committee has absolute discretion to administer and interpret this policy in our best interests.

Ownership Guidelines

In order to encourage our directors and Named Executive Officers to retain investments in us and help further align their interests with the interests of our stockholders, the Committee has adopted stock ownership guidelines applicable to our directors, our Chief Executive Officer and our other Named Executive Officers, recommending that they hold the following amounts of our stock:

PositionStock Ownership Guideline
Chief Executive Officer6x base salary
Other NEOs2x base salary
Director3x annual cash fee
All NEOs50% of net shares received upon exercise/vesting of equity awards (24 month holding period)

For purposes of determining compliance with these ownership guidelines (other than the holding period for vested equity compensation), the value of each director’s or officer’s stock holdings will be calculated based on the closing price of a share of our common stock on the last trading day of our fiscal year, which was $16.72 on September 28, 2018. Shares owned by a director or officer include: shares owned outright by the director or officer or by his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; shares held in trust or under a similar arrangement for the economic benefit of the change of control,director or alternatively, terminate the amended employment agreement and receive the greaterofficer; restricted or unrestricted stock issued as part of the base salary due underdirector or officer’s compensation, whether or not vested; shares acquired upon option exercise that the remaining term ofdirector or executive officer continues to own; and shares held for the agreementdirector or one year’s base salary at the date of termination. Mr. Miller was awarded his new amended employment agreement because of the many contributions he has made towards the Company’s progress, as further detailed above, under the heading “Bonuses”.executive officer’s account in a 401(k) or other retirement plan.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer Stock Ownership Policy was adopted in September 2015. As of September 30, 2018, Mr. Michael P. Landy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, owned stock valued at more than 13x his base salary and which is also approximately 2.0x our CEO stock ownership requirement. Our Director Stock Ownership policy was adopted effective September 12, 2017, and our other stock ownership policies were adopted effective October 1, 2017.

The aggregate stock ownership of our directors and officers represent approximately 4.5% of our outstanding common stock, which currently represents the third largest block of shareholders behind two institutional investors and helps align our management’s interests with our shareholders’ interests.

76

Compensation Committee Report

 

The Compensation Committee of the Companyour Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the boardour Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this report.

 

 Compensation Committee:
Stephen B. Wolgin (Chairman)
 Brian H. Haimm (Chairman)
 

Matthew I. Hirsch

Gregory T. Otto

 

 7377 

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following Summary Compensation Table shows compensation paid or accrued by the Companyus for services rendered during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015,2018, 2017, and 20142016 to the named executive officers.Named Executive Officers. There were no other executive officers whose aggregate compensation allocated to the Company forexceeded $100,000 during fiscal 2016 exceeded $100,000.2018.

 

Name and

Principal Position

 

Fiscal

Year

 

Salary

($)

 Bonus ($) Restricted Stock Awards (4) Option Awards ($) (5) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) 

Change in PensionValue And Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

($)

  All Other
Compensation ($)
 Total ($)  

Fiscal

Year

  

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock

Awards ($) (4)

  

Option

Awards

($) (5)

  

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

($)

  

Change in

Pension Value

And Nonqualified

Deferred Compensation

Earnings

($)

  

All Other

Compensation ($)

  Total ($) 
Eugene W. Landy  2016  $425,375  $65,769  $545,600  $48,340  $210,000   $16,601 (1) $49,500 (2) $1,361,185   2018  $430,500  $95,615  $4,823  $119,600  $95,000  $11,043(1) $68,500(2) $825,081 
Chairman of the Board  2015   403,750   24,808   59,320   60,315   -0-   19,075 (1)  47,000 (2)  614,268   2017   430,500   66,558   17,130   104,650   90,000   13,929(1)  58,750   781,517 
  2014   357,500   27,500   -0-   34,549   90,000   30,625 (1)  42,000 (2)  582,174   2016   425,375   65,769   545,600   48,100   210,000   16,601(1)  49,500   1,360,945 
                                                                   
Michael P. Landy  2016  $551,250  $501,202  $-0-  $-0-  $135,000  $-0-  $63,100 (3) $1,250,552   2018  $787,500  $160,577  $210,698  $-0-  $290,000  $-0-  $83,080(3) $1,531,855 
President and Chief  2015   525,000   100,192   158,920   -0-   -0-   -0-  60,400 (3)  844,512   2017   750,000   105,000   17,130   -0-   130,000   -0-   73,130   1,075,260 
Executive Officer  2014   500,000   82,500   -0-   -0-   60,000   -0-  55,200 (3)  697,700   2016   551,250   501,202   -0-   -0-   135,000   -0-   63,100   1,250,552 
                                                                     
Kevin S. Miller  2016  $330,637  $74,329  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $10,600 (7) $415,567   2018  $392,538  $141,250  $4,823  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $81,316(6) $619,927 
Chief Financial and  2015   239,663   73,885   99,600   -0-  $-0-   -0-  10,400 (7)  423,548   2017   373,846   81,000   17,130   58,000   -0-   -0-   28,616   558,592 
Accounting Officer  2014   228,250   67,500   101,900   -0-   -0-   -0-  9,460 (7)  407,110   2016   330,637   74,329   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   10,600   415,566 
                                                                   
Allison Nagelberg  2016  $337,188  $62,500  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $10,600 (7) $410,288   2018  $372,094  $92,500  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $10,800(7) $475,394 
General Counsel  2015   312,656   60,601   49,800   -0-   -0-   -0-  10,400 (7)  433,457   2017   354,375   63,125   -0-   43,500   -0-   -0-   10,600   471,600 
  2014   252,656 (6)   52,500   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-  7,140 (7)  312,296   2016   337,188   62,500   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   10,600   410,288 

 

Notes:

 

 (1)Accrual for pension and other benefits of $16,601, $19,075$11,043, $13,929 and $30,625$16,601 for fiscal 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively, in accordance with Mr. Landy’s employment agreement.
 
(2)Represents Director’s annual board cash retainerdirectors’ fee of $33,500, $31,000 and $26,000$48,000 for fiscal 2016, 20152018 and 2014, respectively, and Director’sdirectors’ meeting fees of $16,000, $16,000 and $16,000$20,500 for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
2018.
 (3)Represents Director’s annual board cash retainerdirectors’ fee of $33,500, $31,000 and $26,000$48,000 for fiscal 2016, 20152018 and 2014, respectively, and Director’sdirectors’ meeting fees of $16,000, $16,000 and $16,000$20,500 for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively,2018 and fringe benefits and discretionary contributions by the Company to the Company’sour 401(k) Plan allocated to an account of the named executive officerNamed Executive Officer and reimbursement of a disability policy.
 
(4)The restricted stock values were established based on the number of shares granted as follows, for fiscal 2016, 9/14/16-2018: 10/3/17-$13.64 (see table below for detail),16.47, for fiscal 2015, 7/5/15 - $9.96 and2017: 9/17/15 – $9.5212/17-$15.92, and for fiscal 2014, 7/5/14 - $10.19.
2016: 9/14/16-$13.64. Unrestricted stock awards in fiscal 2018 comprises an annual directors’ fee paid to Mr. Eugene W. Landy, Mr. Michael P. Landy and Mr. Kevin S. Miller in the form of 300 shares of unrestricted common stock each (900 shares total) valued at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share. Unrestricted stock awarded in fiscal 2017 comprises one quarter of an annual cash directors’ fee paid to Mr. Eugene W. Landy, Mr. Michael P. Landy and Mr. Kevin S. Miller in the form of 76 shares of unrestricted common stock each (228 total) valued at $15.92 per share.
 (5)The fair value of the stock option grant was based on the Black-Scholes valuation model. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statementstable below for assumptions used in the model.detail. The actual value of the options will depend upon theour performance of the Company during the period of time the options are outstanding and the price of the Company’sour common stock on the date of exercise.
 
(6)Allison Nagelberg, the Company’s General Counsel, was an employeeRepresents annual cash directors’ fee of UMH through December 31, 2013. During the 1st quarter$48,000, directors’ meeting fees of fiscal 2014, approximately 70% of her salary compensation cost was$20,500 and discretionary contributions to our 401(k) Plan allocated to and reimbursed by the Company for her services, pursuant to a cost sharing arrangement between the Company and UMH. Effective January 1, 2014, Ms. Nagelberg became an employeeaccount of the CompanyNamed Executive Officer and her salary is no longer allocated between UMH and the Company.
reimbursement of a disability policy.
 (7)Consists of fringe benefits and discretionary contributions by the Company to the Company’sour 401(k) Plan allocated to an account of the named executive officer.Named Executive Officer and reimbursement of a disability policy.

 

 7478 

 

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Michael P. Landy:

For Fiscal 2018:

-The annual total compensation of the employee identified at the median of our company as of September 30, 2018 (other than the CEO) was $200,874; and
-The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Form 10-K, was $1,531,855.

Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was 7.6 to 1.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

Pay ratios within our industry will also differ and may not be comparable depending on the size, scope, global breadth and structure of the company.

To identify the median employee of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments and estimates that we used were as follows:

-To identify our median employee, we calculated fiscal 2018 compensation using each employee’s annual base salary, bonuses, value of equity awards and our contributions to applicable retirement plans;
-We determined that, as of September 30, 2018, our employee population, excluding our CEO (“Employee Population”), consisted of 14 individuals;
-With the exception of our CEO, we did not exclude any employees from our Employee Population;
-All employees are located in the United States, and therefore we did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the median employee; and
-Once the median employee was identified, we calculated the total compensation for our median employee using the same methodology we used to calculate Mr. Michael P. Landy’s total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the fiscal year 2018.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

On July 26,At our Annual Meeting held on May 18, 2017, our common shareholders approved our Amended and Restated 2007 the 2007 Stock Option and StockIncentive Award Plan (the Plan) which extended the term of our 2007 Plan) was approved by the Company’s shareholders authorizing the grant to officers, directors and key employees, of options to purchase up to 1,500,000Incentive Award Plan for an additional 10 years, until March 13, 2027, added 1,600,000 shares of common stock. On May 6, 2010,stock to the Company’s shareholders approved an amendmentshare reserve, expanded the types of awards available for grant under the Plan and restatement ofmade other improvements to the 2007 Plan. The amendment and restatement made two significant changes: (1) the inclusion of directors as participants in the 2007 Plan and (2) the ability to grant restricted stock to Directors, officers and key employees. The amendment and restatement also made other conforming, technical and other minor changes. The amendment also makes certain modifications and clarifications, including concerning administration and compliance with applicable tax rules, such as Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

Options to purchase 65,000 shares were granted in 2016fiscal 2018 and options to purchase 245,00040,000 shares were exercised during fiscal 2016.2018. In addition, during fiscal 2016, 40,0002018, 12,500 shares of restricted common stock and 3,670 shares of unrestricted common stock were granted at a grant date fair value of $13.64 per share.granted. As of September 30, 2016,2018, the number of shares remaining for future grant under the Plan is 1,671,872.

79

The Committee, in its capacity as Plan Administrator shall determine, among other things: the recipients of stockawards; the type and number of awards participants will receive; the terms, conditions and forms of the awards; the times and conditions subject to which awards may be exercised or become vested, deliverable or exercisable, or as to which any restrictions may apply or lapse; and may amend or modify the terms and conditions of an award, except that repricing of options or restrictedStock Appreciation Rights (SAR) is not permitted without shareholder approval.

No participant may receive awards during any calendar year covering more than 200,000 shares of common stock or more than $1,500,000 in cash. Regular annual awards granted to non-employee directors as compensation for services as non-employee directors, during any of our fiscal years, may not exceed $100,000 in value of the date of grant, and the grant date value of any special or one-time award upon election or appointment to the Board of Directors may not exceed $200,000.

Awards granted pursuant to the Plan generally may not vest until the first anniversary of the date the award was granted, provided, however, that up to 5% of the Common Shares available under the 2007Plan may be awarded to any one or more Eligible Individuals without the minimum vesting period.

If an award made under the Plan is 444,878.forfeited, expires or is converted into shares of another entity in connection with a recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, exchange of shares or other similar event, or the award is settled in cash, the shares associated with the forfeited, expired, converted or settled award will become available for additional awards under the Plan.

 

OptionsThe term of any stock option or SAR generally may not be granted under the 2007 Plan any time as determined by the Compensation Committee up through March 26, 2017. No option granted under the 2007 Plan shall be available for exercise beyond ten years. All options are exercisable after one yearmore than 10 years from the date of grant. The optionexercise price per common share under the 2007 Plan generally may not be below 100% of the fair market value of a common share at the date of grant. Canceled or expired options are added back to the “pool” of shares available under the 2007 Plan.

 

Under the 2007 Plan, the Compensation Committee determines the recipients of restricted stock awards; the number of restricted shares to be awarded; the length of the restricted period of the award; the restrictions applicable to the award including, without limitation, the employment or retirement status of the participant; rules governing forfeiture and restrictions applicable to any sale, assignment, transfer, pledge or other encumbrance of the restricted stock during the restricted period; and the eligibility to share in dividends and other distributions paid to the Company’s shareholders during the restricted period. The maximum number of shares underlying restricted stock awards that may be granted in any one fiscal year to a participant is 100,000.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

All restricted stock awards granted during fiscal year 20162018 vest 1/5th per year over a five year period and all dividends paid on unvested shares are reinvested in additional shares of restricted stock.stock subject to the same vesting schedule. The following table sets forth, for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, information regarding individual grants of restricted stock and individual grants of stock options made under the 2007 Plan during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016:2018:

 

Name Grant Date Number of Shares of Restricted Stock  Number of Shares Underlying Options  Exercise Price of Option Award or Fair Value Per Share at Grant Date of Restricted Stock Award  Grant Date Fair Value 
Eugene W. Landy 01/05/16  -0-   65,000(1) $10.37  $48,100(2)
Eugene W. Landy 09/14/16  40,000   -0-   13.64   545,600 
80

Name Grant
Date
 All Other
Stock
Awards;
Number of
Shares of
Restricted
Stock (1)
  All Other
Stock
Awards;
Number of
Shares of
Unrestricted
Stock (2)
  All Other
Option
Awards;
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Options (3)
  Exercise Price of
Option Award
or Fair Value Per
Share at Grant
Date of Stock
Award
  Grant Date
FairValue
 
Eugene W. Landy 1/3/18  -0-   -0-   65,000  $17.80  $119,600(4)
Eugene W. Landy 1/16/18  -0-   71   -0-  $17.05  $1,211 
Eugene W. Landy 3/27/18  -0-   82   -0-  $14.64  $1,200 
Eugene W. Landy 6/19/18  -0-   77   -0-  $15.59  $1,200 
Eugene W. Landy 9/13/18  -0-   70   -0-  $17.31  $1,212 
Michael P. Landy 10/3/17  12,500   -0-   -0-  $16.47  $205,875 
Michael P. Landy 1/16/18  -0-   71   -0-  $17.05  $1,211 
Michael P. Landy 3/27/18  -0-   82   -0-  $14.64  $1,200 
Michael P. Landy 6/19/18  -0-   77   -0-  $15.59  $1,200 
Michael P. Landy 9/13/18  -0-   70   -0-  $17.31  $1,212 
Kevin S. Miller 1/16/18  -0-   71   -0-  $17.05  $1,211 
Kevin S. Miller 3/27/18  -0-   82   -0-  $14.64  $1,200 
Kevin S. Miller 6/19/18  -0-   77   -0-  $15.59  $1,200 
Kevin S. Miller 9/13/18  -0-   70   -0-  $17.31  $1,212 

 

 (1)Represents restricted common stock which vests 1/5th every October 3rd over the next five years. Fair value on the date of grant was $16.47 per share.
(2)Comprises an annual directors’ fee paid to Mr. Eugene W. Landy, Mr. Michael P. Landy and Mr. Kevin S. Miller in the form of 300 shares of unrestricted common stock each (900 shares total) valued at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.
(3)These options expire 8 years from grant date and are exercisable 1 year after grant date.
 
(2)(4)This value was established using the Black-Scholes stock option valuation model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the model: expected volatility of 20.20%16.45%; risk-free interest rate of 2.09%2.37%; dividend yield of 6.17%3.82%; expected life of options of 8 years; and -0- estimated forfeitures. The fair value per share granted was $0.74.$1.84. The actual value of the options will depend upon theour performance of the Company during the period of time the options are outstanding and the price of the Company’sour common stock on the date of exercise.

 

75

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 

Our executive compensation policies and practices, pursuant to which the compensation set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table was paid or awarded to our named executive officers,Named Executive Officers, are described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and below under “Employment Agreements.”

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

The following table sets forth summary information concerning option exercisesoptions exercised and vesting of restricted stock awards for each of the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016:2018:

 

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2016
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018
 Option Awards Restricted Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized on
Exercise (1)
($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
 Value realized on
Vesting
($)
  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized on
Exercise (1)
($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
 Value realized on
Vesting
($)
 
Eugene W. Landy  130,000  $570,050   11,003  $153,058(2)  -0-   -0-   10,578  $181,082(2)
Michael P. Landy  50,000   131,250   9,250   127,270(3)  -0-   -0-   4,230   71,122(3)
Kevin S. Miller  -0-   -0-   6,805   91,255(4)  -0-   -0-   7,960   133,818(4)
Allison Nagelberg  -0-   -0-   5,106   70,844(5)  -0-   -0-   1,165   19,607(5)

81

 

 (1)Value realized based on the difference between the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of exercise less the exercise price of the stock option.
 
(2)Value realized based on the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of vesting made up of 6,0801,165 shares vested on 7/5/1618 at $13.41$16.83 per share; 4,4589,113 shares vested on 9/6/1614/18 at $14.62$17.19 per share and 465300 shares issued throughout fiscal 2018 in connection with annual director fees which vested on 9/14/16 at $13.64a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.
 (3)Value realized based on the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of vesting made up of 6,2083,494 shares vested on 7/5/1618 at $13.41$16.83 per share; 2,577436 shares vested on 9/6/1614/18 at $14.62$17.19 per share and 465300 shares issued throughout fiscal 2018 in connection with annual director fees which vested on 9/14/16 at $13.64a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.
 (4)Value realized based on the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of vesting made up of 6,8057,454 shares vested on 7/5/1618 at $13.41$16.83 per share, 206 shares vested on 9/14/18 at $17.19 per share and 300 shares issued throughout fiscal 2018 in connection with annual director fees which vested at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.
 (5)Value realized based on the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of vesting made up of 3,1471,165 shares vested on 7/5/1618 at $13.41 per share and 1,959 shares vested on 9/6/16 at $14.62$16.83 per share.

 

76

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

 

The following table sets forth for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, information regarding stock options and restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2016:2018:

 

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2016
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018
 Option Awards Restricted Stock Awards Option Awards Restricted Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
 Option
exercise
price ($)
 Option
expiration
date
 Number of
Shares That
Have Not Vested
 Market Value
Of Shares that Have
Not Vested (2)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
 Option
exercise
price ($)
 Option
expiration
date
 Number of
Shares That
Have Not Vested
 Market Value
Of Shares that Have
Not Vested (2)
 
Eugene W. Landy                 49,989(3)$713,343                   30,055(3) $502,514 
(1)  -0-   65,000  $10.37   01/05/24       
  -0-   65,000(1) $17.80   01/03/26         
  65,000   -0-   15.04   01/04/25         
  65,000   -0-   11.16   01/05/23         65,000   -0-   10.37   01/05/24         
  65,000   -0-   8.94   01/03/22         65,000   -0-   11.16   01/05/23         
  65,000   -0-   10.46   01/03/21         65,000   -0-   8.94   01/03/22         
  65,000   -0-   9.33   01/03/20         65,000   -0-   10.46   01/03/21         
  65,000   -0-   8.72   01/03/19         65,000   -0-   9.33   01/03/20         
  65,000   -0-   7.22   01/05/18         65,000   -0-   8.72   01/03/19         
                                              
Michael P. Landy  -0-   -0-  $-0-   -  16,675(4)$237,952   -0-   -0-  $-0-   -   21,430(4) $358,309 
                                              
Kevin S. Miller  -0-   -0-  $-0-   -  20,374(5)$290,737   40,000   -0-  $14.24   12/09/24   8,047(5) $134,553 
                                              
Allison Nagelberg  -0-   -0-  $-0-   -  6,315(6)$90,115   30,000   -0-  $14.24   12/09/24   2,354(6) $39,363 

 

 (1)These options will become exercisable on January 5, 2017.
3, 2019.
 (2)Based on the closing price of our common stock on September 30, 20162018 of $14.27.$16.72. Restricted stock awards vest over 5 years.
 
(3)4,568 shares vest on September 6, 2017; 264 shares vest on September 14, 2017; 4,308 shares vest 1/4 on September 17th over the next 4 years; 849 shares vest 1/4 on September 14th over the next 4 years and 40,000 shares vest 1/5thon September 14th over the next 5 years.
(4)2,641 shares vest on September 6, 2017; 264 shares vest September 14, 2017; 12,920 shares vest 1/4 on July 5th over the next 4 years; and 850 shares vest 1/4th on September 14th over the next 4 years.
(5)4,8992,354 shares vest 1/2 on July 5th over the next 2 years; 6,861470 shares vest 1/2 on September 14th over the next 2 years; 26,392 shares vest 1/3thrd on July 5September 14th over the next 3 years and 8,614839 shares vest 1/4thon July 5September 14th over the next 4 years.
 
(6)(4)2,0077,062 shares vest on September 6, 2017 and 4,308 shares vest 1/4th2 on July 5th over the next 2 years; and 470 shares vest 1/2 on September 14th over the next 2 years; 839 shares vest 1/4th on September 14th over the next 4 years and 13,059 shares vest 1/5thon October 3rd over the next 5 years.
(5)2,500 shares vest on July 5, 2019; 4,708 shares vest 1/2 on July 5th over the next 2 years and 839 shares vest 1/4thon September 14th over the next 4 years.
(6)2,354 shares vest 1/2 on July 5th over the next 2 years.

 

Employment Agreements

 

Eugene W. Landy, the Company’sour Chairman of the Board, executed an Employment Agreement on December 9, 1994, which was amended on June 26, 1997 (the “First Amendment”)(First Amendment), on November 5, 2003 (the “Second Amendment”)(Second Amendment), on April 1, 2008 (the “Third Amendment”)(Third Amendment), on July 1, 2010 (the “Fourth Amendment”)(Fourth Amendment), on April 25, 2013 (the “Fifth Amendment”)(Fifth Amendment), on December 20, 2013 (the “Sixth Amendment”)(Sixth Amendment), on December 18, 2014 (the “Seventh Amendment”)(Seventh Amendment) and on January 12, 2016 (the “Eighth Amendment”)(Eighth Amendment) – collectively, the “Amended Employment Agreement”. Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Eugene Landy’s base salary was $410,000 per year, effective January 1, 2015, and was increased pursuant to the Eighth Amendment to $430,500 per year, effective January 1, 2016. He is entitled to receive pension payments of $50,000 per year through 2020; in fiscal 2015, the Company2018, we accrued $19,075$11,043 in additional compensation expense related to the pension benefits. Mr. Eugene Landy’s incentive bonus schedule is detailed in the Fourth Amendment and is based on progress toward achieving certain target levels of growth in market capitalization, funds from operations and dividends per share. Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Eugene Landy will receive each year an option to purchase 65,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.Common Shares. Mr. Eugene Landy is entitled to five weeks paid vacation annually, and he is entitled to participate in the Company’sour employee benefit plans.

 

 7782 

 

The Amended Employment Agreement provides for aggregate severance payments of $500,000, payable to Mr. Eugene Landy upon the termination of his employment for any reason in increments of $100,000 per year for five years. He is entitled to disability payments in the event of his disability (as defined in the Amended Employment Agreement) for a period of three years equal to his base salary. The Amended Employment Agreement provides for a death benefit of $500,000, payable to Mr. Eugene Landy’s designated beneficiary. Upon the termination of Mr. Eugene Landy’s employment, following, or as a result of, certain types of transactions that lead to a significant increase in the Company’sour market capitalization, the Amended Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Eugene Landy will receive a grant of 35,000 to 65,000 shares of the Company’s common stock,Common Shares, depending on the amount of the increase in the Company’sour market capitalization, all of his outstanding options to purchase shares of the Company common stockCommon Shares will become immediately vested, and he will be entitled to continue to receive benefits under the Company’sour health insurance and similar plans for one year. In the event of a change in control, of the Company,Mr. Eugene W. Landy shall receive a lump sum payment of $2,500,000, provided that the sale price of the Company is at least $10 per share of common stock. A change of control is defined as the consummation of a reorganization, merger, share exchange, consolidation, or sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.our assets. This change of control provision will not apply to any combination between the Companyus and UMH. Payment will be made simultaneously with the closing of the transaction, and only in the event that the transaction closes. The Amended Employment Agreement is terminable by the Company’sour Board of Directors at any time by reason of Mr. Eugene Landy’s death or disability or for cause, which is defined in the Amended Employment Agreement as a termination of the agreement if the Company’sour Board of Directors determines in good faith that Mr. Eugene Landy failed to substantially perform his duties to the Companyus (other than due to his death or disability), or has engaged in conduct the consequences of which are materially adverse to the Company,us, monetarily or otherwise. Upon termination of the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Eugene Landy will remain entitled to the disability, severance, death and pension benefits provided for in the Amended Employment Agreement.

 

Effective April 9, 2013, Michael P. Landy was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to April 9, 2013, Mr. Michael Landy was the Chief Operating Officer. Effective October 1, 2013, the Company and Michael P. Landy entered into a three-year employment agreement with us, under which Mr. Michael Landy received an annual base salary of $500,000 for fiscal year 2014 with increases of 5% for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, plus bonuses and customary fringe benefits. Mr. Landy’s incentive bonus schedule is based on progress toward achieving certain target levels of growth in market capitalization, adjusted funds from operations and dividends per share. Mr. Landy also receives four weeks’ vacation, annually. The Company reimburses Mr. Landy for the cost of a disability insurance policy such that, in the event of Mr. Landy’s disability for a period of more than 90 days, Mr. Landy will receive benefits up to 60% of his then-current salary. In the event of a merger, sale or change of voting control of the Company, excluding transactions between the Company and UMH, Mr. Landy will have the right to extend and renew this employment agreement so that the expiration date will be three years from the date of merger, sale or change of voting control, or Mr. Landy may terminate the employment agreement and be entitled to receive one year’s compensation in accordance with the agreement. If there is a termination of employment by the Company or by Mr. Landy for any reason, either involuntary or voluntary, including the death of the employee, other than a termination for cause as defined by the agreement, Mr. Landy shall be entitled to the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or two years’ compensation at the date of termination, paid monthly over the remaining term or life of the agreement.

78

On January 11, 2016, the Companywe entered into an amended and restated Employment Agreement (“Employment Agreement”)(Employment Agreement) with Mr. Michael P. Landy, which became effective October 1, 2016. Upon signing the Employment Agreement, Mr. Michael Landy received a signing bonus of $400,000 in recognition of the substantial progress that the Company haswe have made under his leadership. Effective October 1, 2016, Mr. Michael Landy receives an annual base salary of $750,000 for fiscal year 2017 with increases of 5% for each of fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, plus targeted bonuses and customary fringe benefits. The Employment Agreement has an initial term of five years, and is renewed automatically for a new five-year term on the first day of each calendar quarter after the effective date unless otherwise terminated. For fiscal years after 2021, Mr. Michael Landy’s base salary shall be set by the Compensation Committee of the Company’sour Board of Directors but will be no less than his base salary for the preceding year. Mr. Michael Landy will receive annual cash bonuses based on the Company’sour achievement of certain performance objectives as determined by the Compensation Committee: a) Growth in Market Cap of 10%, 15% or 20%, Mr. Michael Landy will receive $40,000, $60,000 or $80,000, respectively; b) Growth in AFFO per share of 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20%, Mr. Michael Landy will receive $50,000, $75,000, $100,000 or $150,000, respectively; and c) Growth in Dividend per Share of 5%, 10% or 15%, Mr. Michael Landy will receive $150,000, $200,000 or $250,000, respectively. Mr. Michael Landy will also be entitled to equity awards of up to 25,000 shares of restricted stock each year based on achievement of performance objectives as determined by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Michael Landy also receives four weeks’ vacation annually and he is entitled to customary fringe benefits including life insurance, health benefits and the right to participate in the Company’sour 401(k) retirement plan. The Company reimbursesWe reimburse Mr. Michael Landy for the cost of a disability insurance policy such that, in the event of Mr. Michael Landy’s disability for a period of more than 90 days, Mr. Michael Landy will receive benefits up to 60% of his then-current salary. Under the Employment Agreement, if Mr. Michael Landy’s employment is terminated for any reason, either voluntarily or involuntarily, including the death of Mr. Michael Landy or termination for cause, Mr. Michael Landy shall be entitled to the base salary plus base target bonuses due under the Employment Agreement for the remaining term of the Employment Agreement (as it has been renewed). The Employment Agreement also provides that, upon a change of control of the Company (as defined below), the Employment Agreement will automatically renew for five years from the date of the change in control and Mr. Michael Landy shall have the right to terminate the Employment Agreement and continue to receive the base salary plus base target bonuses and restricted stock awards he would have been entitled to receive during the remaining term of the Employment Agreement. In addition, provided that Mr. Michael Landy is actively employed by the Companyus as of the consummation of a change of control, Mr. Michael Landy shall be entitled to a transaction bonus consistent with the terms of any applicable transaction bonus plan that the Companywe may adopt. The term “Change of Control” under Mr. Michael Landy’s amended employment agreement means (i) a sale of substantially all of the Company’sour assets, not in the ordinary course, to an unaffiliated third party, (ii) the transfer, in one transaction or a series of transactions, to an unaffiliated third party, of outstanding shares of the Company’sour capital stock representing a majority of the then outstanding voting stock, (iii) a majority of the Company’sour Directors ceasing to be individuals who either were members of the Board immediately following the Company’sour 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or whose election as a director was approved by a majority of such incumbent directors or their approved successors, (iv) a merger or consolidation having the same effect as item (i), (ii) or (iii) above or (iv) any other event of a nature that would be required to be reported as a change of control in item 5.01 of Form 8-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or any successor provision thereto).

 

83

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company and2016, Kevin S. Miller Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, entered into a new three-year employment agreement with us, under which Mr. Miller receivedwill receive an annual base salary of $220,000$360,000 for calendar year 20132016 with increases of 5% for each of calendar years 20142017 and 2015,2018, plus bonuses and customary fringe benefits. Mr. Miller also receivedreceives four weeks’ vacation, annually. The Company reimbursedWe reimburse Mr. Miller for the cost of a disability insurance policy such that, in the event of Mr. Miller’s disability for a period of more than 90 days, Mr. Miller will receive benefits up to 60% of his then-current salary. In the event of a merger, sale or change of voting control, of the Company, excluding transactions between the Company and UMH, Mr. Miller would have had the right to extend and renew this employment agreement so that the expiration date would have been three years from the date of merger, sale or change of voting control, or Mr. Miller could terminate the employment agreement and be entitled to receive one year’s compensation in accordance with the agreement. If there were a termination of employment by the Company or by Mr. Miller for any reason, either involuntary or voluntary, including the death of the employee, other than a termination for cause as defined by the agreement, Mr. Miller was entitled to one year’s base salary at the date of termination, paid monthly over the remaining term or life of the agreement.

79

Effective January 1, 2016, the Company and Kevin S. Miller, entered into a new three-year employment agreement, under which Mr. Miller will receive an annual base salary of $360,000 for calendar year 2016 with increases of 5% for each of calendar years 2017 and 2018, plus bonuses and customary fringe benefits. Mr. Miller also receives four weeks’ vacation, annually. The Company reimburses Mr. Miller for the cost of a disability insurance policy such that, in the event of Mr. Miller’s disability for a period of more than 90 days, Mr. Miller will receive benefits up to 60% of his then-current salary. In the event of a merger, sale or change of voting control of the Company, excluding transactions between the Companyus and UMH, Mr. Miller will have the right to extend and renew the employment agreement so that the expiration date will be three years from the date of merger, sale or change of voting control, or Mr. Miller may terminate the employment agreement and be entitled to receive the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s base salary at the date of termination, paid monthly over the remaining term or life of the agreement. If there is a termination of employment by the Companyus or by Mr. Miller for any reason, either involuntary or voluntary, including the death of the employee, other than a termination for cause as defined by the agreement, Mr. Miller shall be entitled to the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s base salary at the date of termination, paid monthly over the remaining term or life of the agreement.

 

Effective January 1, 2014, the Company and2017, Ms. Allison Nagelberg General Counsel, entered into a new three-year employment agreement with us, under which Ms. Nagelberg receives an annual base salary of $275,625$358,313 for calendar year 2014, $325,0002017, with increases of 5% for each of calendar year 2015,years 2018 and $341,250 for calendar year 2016,2019, plus bonuses and customary fringe benefits. Under the employment agreement, Ms. Nagelberg also receives four weeks’ vacation, annually. The Company reimbursesWe reimburse Ms. Nagelberg for the cost of a disability insurance policy such that, in the event of Ms. Nagelberg’s disability for a period of more than 90 days, Ms. Nagelberg will receive benefits up to 60% of her then-current salary. In the event of a merger, sale or change of voting control, of the Company, excluding transactions between the Companyus and UMH, Ms. Nagelberg will have the right to extend and renew this employment agreement so that the expiration date will be three years from the date of merger, sale or change of voting control, or Ms. Nagelberg may terminate the employment agreement and be entitled to receive one year’s compensation in accordance with the agreement. If there is a termination of employment by the Companyus or Ms. Nagelberg for any reason, either involuntary or voluntary, including the death of the employee, other than a termination for cause as defined by the agreement, Ms. Nagelberg shall be entitled to the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s compensation at the date of termination, paid monthly over the remaining term or life of the agreement.

 

84

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change-in-Control

 

Under the employment agreements with our President and Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officersNamed Executive Officers listed below, our President and Chief Executive Officer and such other named executive officersNamed Executive Officers are entitled to receive the following estimated payments and benefits upon a termination of employment or voluntary resignation (with or without a change-in-control). These disclosed amounts are estimates only and do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that would be paid to the named executive officers,Named Executive Officers, which would only be known at the time that they become eligible for payment and would only be payable if a termination of employment, or voluntary resignation, were to occur. The table below reflects the amount that could be payable under the various arrangements assuming that the termination of employment had occurred at September 30, 2016.2018. Each of the employees named in the table below have restricted stock awards and/or stock option awards which are listed in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table previously disclosed. Restricted Stock Awards vest upon the termination of an employee due to death or disability. In addition, restricted stock awards vest on the date of an involuntary termination of employment with the Companyor if the employee retires. If the termination of employment is for any other reason, including voluntary resignation, termination not for cause or good reason resignation, termination for cause, or termination not for cause or good reason (after a change in control), the restricted stock awards are forfeited. Regarding the stock option awards, if the termination is for any reason other than a termination for cause, the stock option awards may be exercised until three months after the termination of employment. If the termination is for cause, the stock option awards are forfeited.

 

80

 Voluntary  Resignation  on 9/30/16 Termination  Not for Cause  Or  Good Reason  Resignation  on 9/30/16 Termination  For Cause  on 9/30/16 Termination  Not for Cause or Good  Reason Resignation  
(After a Change-in-Control)  on 9/30/16
 Disability/  Death on  9/30/16   

Voluntary

Resignation

on

9/30/18

   

Termination

Not for Cause

Or

Good Reason

Resignation

on

9/30/18

   

Termination

For Cause

on

9/30/18

   

Termination

Not for Cause or Good

Reason Resignation

(After a Change-in-Control)

on

9/30/18

   

Disability/

Death on

9/30/18

 
Eugene W. Landy $527,958(3) $527,958(3) $508,279(2) $3,027,959(4) $1,819,459(5)  $530,110(3)  $530,110(3)  $508,279(2)  $3,030,110(4)  $1,821,610(5)
Michael P. Landy  4,144,217(6)  4,144,217(6)  4,144,217(6)  4,144,217(6)  4,144,217(6)  4,429,983(6)  4,429,983(6)  4,429,983(6)  4,429,983(6)  4,429,983(6)
Kevin S. Miller  864,900(7)  864,900(7)  6,923(1)  864,900(7)  864,900(7)  396,900(7)  396,900(7)  7,633(1)  396,900(7)  396,900(7)
Allison Nagelberg  341,250(8)  341,250(8)  6,563(1)  341,250(8)  341,250(8)  489,097(8)  489,097(8)  7,235(1)  489,097(8)  489,097(8)

 

 (1)Consists of accrued vacation time, which would be payable in a lump sum payment.
 (2)Consists of severance payments of $500,000, payable $100,000 per year for 5 years, and $8,279 of accrued vacation, which would be payable in a lump sum payment.
 
(3)Consists of severance payments of $500,000, payable $100,000 per year for 5 years, plus the $19,680$21,832 estimated cost of continuation of benefits for one year following termination and $8,279 of accrued vacation, which would be payable in a lump sum payment.
 (4)Mr. Eugene W. Landy shall receive a lump-sum payment of $2,500,000 in the event of a change in control, provided that the sale price of the Companyour common stock is at least $10 per share of common stock.share. In addition, if Mr. Eugene W. Landy’s employment agreement is terminated, he receives severance payments of $500,000, which would be payable $100,000 per year for 5 years, continuation of benefits for one year following termination and accrued vacation.
 (5)In the event of a disability, as defined in the agreement, Mr. Eugene W. Landy shall receive disability payments equal to his base salary for a period of three years, continuation of benefits for one year following termination and accrued vacation. He has a death benefit of $500,000 payable in a lump sum to Mr. Eugene W. Landy’s beneficiary.
 
(6)Payments are calculated based on Mr. Michael P. Landy’s amended and restated employment agreement, which became effective October 1, 2016, which is the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement.
 (7)Payments are calculated based on Mr. Kevin S. Miller’s employment agreement, which is the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s base salary at the date of termination.
 
(8)Payments are calculated based on Ms. Allison Nagelberg’s employment agreement which is the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s compensation at the date of termination.

 

The Company retains the discretion to compensate any officer upon any future termination of employment or a change-in-control. Compensation Risk

The Compensation Committee has assessed our compensation program for the purpose of viewing and considering any risks presented by our compensation policies and practices that are likely to have a material adverse effect on us. As part of that assessment, managementwe reviewed the primary elements of our compensation program, including base salary, annual bonus opportunities, equity compensation and severance arrangements. Management’sOur risk assessment included a review of the overall design of each primary element of our compensation program, and an analysis of the various design features, controls and approval rights in place with respect to compensation paid to management and other employees that mitigate potential risks to us that could arise from our compensation program. Following the assessment, managementwe determined that our compensation policies and practices did not create risks that were reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us and reported the results of the assessment to the Compensation Committee.

 

Director Compensation

Effective September 1, 2013, Directors received a fee of $4,000 for each Board meeting attended, $500 for each Board telephone meeting attended, and an additional fixed annual fee of $26,000 payable quarterly. Directors appointed to board committees receive $1,200 for each committee meeting attended. Effective January 1, 2015, the Directors annual fee increased from $26,000 to $31,000. Effective September 12, 2016, the Directors annual fee increased from $31,000 to $41,000. All other fees remained the same.

 8185 

Director Compensation

Effective September 12, 2017, the annual cash directors’ fee increased from $41,000 to $48,000, plus an additional amount to be paid in our unrestricted common stock valued at $4,800 for a total annual directors’ fee of $52,800. This annual directors’ fee will be paid quarterly. Effective in fiscal 2018, Directors received an increase in their meeting attendance fee from $4,000 to $5,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, and they will continue to receive $500 for each telephonic Board meeting attended. Directors appointed to Board committees will continue to receive $1,200 for each committee meeting attended.

 

The table below sets forth a summary of director compensation for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016:2018:

 

 Annual Board Cash Meeting Committee Total Fees Earned or Paid  Annual
Board Cash
 Meeting Committee Unrestricted
Stock
   
Director Retainer Fees Fees in Cash  Retainer Fees Fees Awards (6) Total Fees 
                    
Anna T. Chew $33,500  $16,000  $-0-  $49,500 
Kiernan Conway $12,000  $5,000  $-0-  $1,212  $18,212 
Daniel D. Cronheim  33,500   16,000   -0-   49,500   48,000   20,500   -0-   4,823   73,323 
Catherine B. Elflein (3)(1)  33,500   16,000   4,800   54,300   48,000   20,500   4,800   4,823   78,123 
Brian H. Haimm (4)(5)  33,500   16,000   6,500   56,000   48,000   20,500   6,500   4,823   79,823 
Neal Herstik (5)  33,500   16,000   -0-   49,500   48,000   20,500   -0-   4,823   73,323 
Matthew I. Hirsch (5)(4)  33,500   16,000   6,000   55,500   48,000   20,500   7,000   4,823   80,323 
Charles Kaempffer (1)  15,500   8,000   2,400   25,900 
Samuel A. Landy  33,500   16,000   -0-   49,500   48,000   20,500   -0-   4,823   73,323 
Gregory T. Otto (3)(4)  48,000   20,500   500   4,823   73,823 
Scott L. Robinson (3)(1)  33,500   16,000   4,800   54,300   48,000   20,500   4,800   4,823   78,123 
Eugene Rothenberg (1)  15,500   8,000   -0-   23,500 
Stephen B. Wolgin (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)  33,500   16,000   6,000   55,500 
Stephen B. Wolgin (1)(4)  48,000   20,500   7,000   4,823   80,323 
Total $332,500  $160,000  $30,500  $523,000  $444,000  $189,500  $30,600  $44,619  $708,719 

 

Mr. Eugene W. Landy, and Mr. Michael P. Landy and Mr. Kevin S. Miller are named executive employees of the Company.Named Executive Officers. As such, their director compensation is included in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

 (1)Emeritus directors are retired directors who have a standing invitation to attend BoardThe Audit Committee for 2018 consists of Directors meetings but are not entitled to vote on board resolutions. However, they receive directors’ fees for participation in the board meetings. Effective April 4, 2016, the emeritus director position has been eliminatedMr. Haimm (Chairman), Mr. Hirsch, Mr. Wolgin, Mr. Robinson and Mr. Kaempffer and Mr. Rothenberg retired as emeritus directors.
Ms. Elflein.
 (2)These directors acted as chairs of the Board’s Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees.
 (3)The Audit Committee for 2016 consists of Mr. Haimm (Chairman), Mr. Hirsch Mr. Wolgin, Mr. Robinson and Ms. Elflein. The board has determined that Mr. Wolgin, Mr. Robinson, Mr. Haimm and Ms. Elflein are considered “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of the rules of the SEC and are “financially literate” within the meaning of the listing requirements of the NYSE.
(4)Mr. Haimm, Mr. Hirsch and Mr. Wolgin (Chairman)Otto are members of the Compensation Committee.
 (4)
(5)Mr. Herstik, Mr. Hirsch (Chairman), Mr. Otto and Mr. Wolgin are members of the Nominating and Governance Committee.
 
(6)(5)Mr. WolginHaimm is the Lead Independent Director whose role is to preside over the executive sessions of the non-management directors.
(6)Comprises an annual directors’ fee paid in the form of 2,770 unrestricted shares of common stock valued at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.

 

Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

 

Except as provided in the specific employment agreement for Mr. Eugene W. Landy, as described above, the Company doeswe do not have pension or other post-retirementpost-employment plans in effect for officers, directors or employees or a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The present value of accumulated benefit of contractual pension benefits for Mr. Eugene W. Landy is $618,974$543,946 as of September 30, 2016.2018. Payments made during the 20162018 fiscal year were $50,000. He is entitled to receive pension payments of $50,000 per year through 2020. The Company’sOur employees may elect to participate in theour 401(k) plan, of UMH Properties, Inc.which is administered by UMH.

 

Other Information

 

Daniel D. Cronheim is a directorone of the Companyour directors and is also an Executive Vice President of David Cronheim Company (Cronheim) and Cronheim Management Services, Inc. (CMSI). Daniel Cronheim received $49,500, $47,000$73,323, $75,880 and $42,000$49,500 for director’s fees in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The CompanyWe have not paid any fees to The David Cronheim Mortgage Corporation, an affiliated company of CMSI, of $-0-, $196,000 and $140,000 in mortgage brokerage commissions inover the last three fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.years.

 

82

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

During fiscal 2016,As of September 30, 2018, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Haimm (Chairman), Hirsch and Wolgin.Otto. No member of the Compensation Committee is a current or former officer or employee of the Company. In fiscal 2016,2018, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee of any entity, or board of directors of any entity that did not have a compensation committee, that had one or more of its executive officers serving on our Compensation Committee. The members of the Compensation Committee did not otherwise have any relationships requiring related-party disclosure in the Company’s Proxy Statement.our Annual Report.

86

 

ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The following table lists information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’sour common and preferred stock (the Common Shares) as of September 30, 20162018 by:

 

 each person known by the Companyus to beneficially own more than five percent of the Company’sour outstanding Common Shares;
   
 the Company’sour directors;
   
 the Company’sour executive officers; and
   
 all of the Company’sour executive officers and directors as a group.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of the person or persons named below is c/o Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-D, Freehold, New Jersey 07728. In determining the number and percentage of Shares beneficially owned by each person, Shares that may be acquired by that person under options exercisable within sixty (60) days of September 30, 20162018 are deemed beneficially owned by that person and are deemed outstanding for purposes of determining the total number of outstanding Common Shares for that person and are not deemed outstanding for that purpose for all other shareholders.

 

 

Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and Nature
of Beneficial

Ownership (1)

  Percentage
of Common Shares
Outstanding(2)
 
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355
  7,324,264(3)  10.63%
         

BlackRock Inc.

40 East 52ndStreet

New York, NY 10022

  4,272,124(4)  6.20%
         
Anna T. Chew  362,411(5)  * 
Daniel D. Cronheim  170,950(6)  * 
Catherine B. Elflein  10,686(7)  * 
Brian H. Haimm  11,560(8)  * 
Neal Herstik  16,312(9)  * 
Matthew I. Hirsch  74,165(10)  * 
Eugene W. Landy  1,980,805(11)  2.86%
Michael P. Landy  580,781(12)  * 
Samuel A. Landy  343,821(13)  * 
Kevin S. Miller  38,133(14)  * 
Allison Nagelberg  70,203(15)  * 
Scott Robinson  6,857(16)  * 
Katie Rytter  8,129(17)  * 
Stephen B. Wolgin  60,570(18)  * 
Directors and Executive Officers as a group  3,735,383   5.39%
 

Common Shares

  Series C Preferred Shares 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and Nature of Beneficial

Ownership (1)

  

Percentage

of Common

Shares

Outstanding (2)

  

Amount and Nature of Beneficial

Ownership (1)

  

Percentage

of Preferred

Shares

Outstanding (3)

 
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355 (4)
  7,951,515   9.76%       

BlackRock, Inc.

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022 (5)

  7,437,398   9.13%       

Wasatch Financial Advisors

505 Wakara Way, 3rd Floor

Salt Lake City, UT 84108 (6)

  

6,444,876

   7.91%       
Kiernan Conway  70   *        
Daniel D. Cronheim (7)  173,563   *        
Catherine B. Elflein (8)  15,922   *        
Brian H. Haimm (9)  14,081   *        
Neal Herstik (10)  20,126   *   2,800   * 
Matthew I. Hirsch (11)  78,736   *        
Eugene W. Landy (12)  2,077,224   2.53%       
Michael P. Landy (13)  638,668   *        
Samuel A. Landy (14)  352,241   *        
Kevin S. Miller (15)  84,838   *        
Allison Nagelberg (16)  114,098   *        
Gregory T. Otto (17)  905   *        
Scott L. Robinson (18)  8,632   *        
Katie Rytter (19)  29,316   *   370       * 
Stephen B. Wolgin (20)  74,890   *   14,013   * 
Directors and Executive Officers as a group  3,683,310   4.49%  17,183   * 

 

*Less than 1%.

 8387 

*Less than 1%.

 

 (1)Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the Company believes that the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Common and Preferred Shares listed.
 (2)Based on the number of Common Shares outstanding on September 30, 2016,2018, which was 68,920,972.
81,503,134.
 (3)Based on the number of Preferred Shares outstanding on September 30, 2018, which was 11,488,001.
(4)Based on Schedule 13F filed with the SEC, The Vanguard Group, Inc. owns 7,324,2647,951,515 Common Shares as of JuneSeptember 30, 2016.2018.
 
(4)(5)Based on Schedule 13F filed with the SEC, BlackRock, Inc. owns 4,272,1247,437,398 Common Shares as of JuneSeptember 30, 2016.
(5)Includes (a) 3,120 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 332,768 Common Shares owned jointly with Ms. Chew’s husband and (c) 29,643 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Ms. Chew’s benefit. Ms. Chew is a co-trustee of the UMH 401(k) Plan and has shared voting power, but no dispositive power, over the 166,499 Common Shares held by the UMH 401(k) Plan. She, however, disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the Common Shares held by the UMH 401(k) Plan, except for the 29,643 Common Shares held by the UMH 401(k) Plan for her benefit.
2018.
 (6)Based on Schedule 13F filed with the SEC, Wasatch Financial Advisors owns 6,444,876 Common Shares as of September 30, 2018.
(7)Includes (a) 1,1131,308 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 80,000 Common Shares held in a trust for Mr. Cronheim’s two minor family members, to which he disclaims any beneficial interest but he has sole dispositive and voting powerpower; and (c) 79,499 Common Shares pledged in a margin accountaccount.
 
(7)(8)Includes (a) 1,1131,308 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 3,500 Common Shares owned jointly with Ms. Elflein’s husband.
 
(8)(9)Includes 8491,308 shares of unvested restricted stock.
 
(9)(10)Includes (a) 1,1131,308 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 1,600 Common Shares owned by Mr. Herstik’s wife.
(10)Includes 1,113 As of September 30, 2018, Mr. Herstik also owned 2,400 of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock and 400 shares of unvested restricted stock.
the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock are owned by the Gross, Truss & Herstik Profit Sharing Plan over which Mr. Herstik has shared voting power and shared dispositive power.
 (11)Includes (a) 49,9891,308 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 3,069 Common Shares owned by Mr. Hirsch’s wife.
(12)Includes (a) 30,055 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 97,914 Common Shares owned by Mr. Eugene Landy’s wife; (c) 225,427221,427 Common Shares held in the Landy & Landy Employees’ Profit Sharing Plan of which Mr. Landy is a trustee and has shared voting and dispositive power; (d) 192,294188,294 Common Shares held in the Landy & Landy Employees’ Pension Plan over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (e) 13,048 Common Shares held in Landy Investments Ltd., over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (f) 154,405179,405 Common Shares held in the Eugene W. and Gloria Landy Family Foundation, a charitable trust, over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (g) 34,84139,361 Common Shares held by Juniper Plaza Associates, over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (h) 27,52129,527 Common Shares held by Windsor Industrial Park Associates, over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (i) 378,951476,451 Common Shares pledged in a margin account; and (j) 409,017 Common Shares pledged as security for loans. Includes 399,000455,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2016.2018. Excludes 65,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option not exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2016.2018.
 
(12)(13)Includes (a) 16,67521,430 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 32,01235,655 Common Shares owned by Mr. Michael Landy’s wife; (c) 155,030169,457 Common Shares held in custodial accounts for Mr. Landy’s children under the New Jersey Uniform Transfer to Minors Act in which he disclaims any beneficial interest but has power to vote;Act; (d) 53,000 Common Shares held by EWL Grandchildren Fund, LLC;LLC over which Mr. Landy has shared voting power and shared dispositive power; (e) 20,27125,431 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Mr. Landy’s benefit; and (f) 157,650 Common Shares pledged in a margin account.
 
(13)(14)Includes (a) 1,1131,308 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 24,38024,940 Common Shares owned by Mr. Samuel Landy’s wife; (c) 22,379 Common Shares held by the Samuel Landy Family Limited Partnership; (d) 53,000 Common Shares held in EWL Grandchildren Fund, LLC;LLC over which Mr. Landy has shared voting power and shared dispositive power; (e) 40,33240,764 Common Shares pledged in a margin account; (f) 172,086171,654 Common Shares pledged as security for a loanloan; and (g) 65,07770,963 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Mr. Landy’s benefit. As a co-trustee of the UMH 401(k) Plan, Mr. Landy has shared voting power, but no dispositive power, over the 166,499188,495 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan. He, however, disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the Common Shares held by the UMH 401(k) Plan, except for the 65,07770,963 Common Shares held by the UMH 401(k) Plan for his benefit.
 
(14)(15)Includes (a) 20,3748,047 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 8811,460 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Mr. Kevin S. Miller’s benefit. Includes 40,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option that is exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2018.
 
(15)(16)Includes (a) 6,3152,354 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 3,3253,619 Common Shares owned by Ms. Nagelberg’s husband; (c) 1,6381,783 Common Shares held in custodial accounts for Ms. Nagelberg’s children under the New Jersey Uniform Transfers to Minors Act with respect to which she disclaims any beneficial interest but she has sole dispositive and voting powerpower; and (d) 9,64113,839 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Ms. Nagelberg’s benefit. Includes 30,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option that is exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2018.

 84(17)Includes 600 shares pledged in a margin account.

 (16)(18)Includes 1,1131,308 shares of unvested restricted stock.
 
(17)(19)Includes (a) 218942 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 360 Common Shares held in custodial accounts for Ms. Rytter’s son and nephew; and b) 636(c) 998 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Ms. Rytter’s benefit.
(18)Includes (a) 1,113 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 2,839 Common Shares owned by Mr. Wolgin’s wife. As of September 30, 2016, Mr. Wolgin also owned (a) 2,600 shares of the Company’s 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock, which was redeemed on October 14, 2016 and (b) 8,500 Ms. Rytter’s husband owns 370 shares of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Cumulative RedeemablePreferred Stock. Includes 20,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option that is exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2018.
(20)Includes (a) 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 4,203 Common Shares owned by Mr. Wolgin’s wife; and (c) 194 Common Shares pledged in a margin account. As of September 30, 2018, Mr. Wolgin also owned 12,013 shares of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, (Serieswith 12,013 Preferred C Shares pledged in a margin account. Mr. Wolgin’s wife also owns 2,000 shares of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock).Stock.

88

 

ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR DEPENDENCEINDEPENDENCE

 

There are no family relationships between any of theour directors or executive officers, of the Company, except that Samuel A. Landy, a director of the Company, and Michael P. Landy, President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director, of the Company, are the sons of Eugene W. Landy, the Chairman of the Board and a director of the Company.an Executive Director.

 

Daniel D. Cronheim is a directorone of the Companyour directors and is also an Executive Vice President of David Cronheim Company (Cronheim) and Cronheim Management Services, Inc. (CMSI). Daniel Cronheim received $49,500, $47,000$73,323, $75,880 and $42,000$49,500 for director’s fees in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We have not paid any fees to The David Cronheim Mortgage Corporation, an affiliated company of CMSI, received $-0-, $196,000 and $140,000 in mortgage brokerage commissions inover the last three fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, from the Company.years.

 

SixFive of our 13 directors of the Company are also directors and shareholders of UMH. The Company holdsWe hold common and preferred stock of UMH in itsour securities portfolio. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K for current holdings. During fiscal 2016, the Company2018, we made total purchases of 77,45659,905 common shares of UMH for a total cost of $777,588,$828,787, or a weighted average cost of $10.04$13.84 per share, of which 67,456 shares were purchased through UMH’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. In addition, the Company made total purchases 100,000 shares of UMH’s 8.00% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a total cost of $2,500,000. During fiscal 2016,2018, UMH made total purchases of 120,098101,304 of our common shares of the Company through the Company’sour DRIP for a total cost of $1,348,141,$1,566,624, or a weighted average cost of $11.23$15.46 per share.

 

The Company currently has thirteenAs of September 30, 2018, we had 14 full-time employees and one part-time employee. One of the Company’s employees (Director of Investor Relations, promoted to Vice President of Investor Relations in June 2015) was shared with UMH through September 30, 2015. Through September 30, 2015, the Vice President of Investor Relations’ salary was allocated 70% to the Company and 30% to UMH based on the time she worked for each entity. Effective October 1, 2015, the Vice President of Investor Relations began working solely for the Company at which point the Company no longer allocates any portion of her salary to UMH. In addition, the Company’sOur Chairman of the Board is also the Chairman of the Board of UMH. Effective as of October 1, 2015, otherOther than the Company’sour Chairman of the Board, the Company doeswe do not share any employees with UMH.

 

On August 22, 2014, the CompanyEffective January 12, 2015, we entered into a seven-year lease agreement to occupy 5,680 square feet for the Company’sour current corporate office space. The corporate office space is located in a new separate suite located in the same building as the Company’s former corporate office space. The lease became effective January 12, 2015, at which time, the Company ceased to share rent expense with UMH. Rent for the Company’sour current corporate office space is at an annual rate of $99,400 or $17.50 per square foot for years one through five and an annual rate of $100,820 or $17.75 per square foot for years six and seven. The Company isWe are also responsible for itsour proportionate share of real estate taxes and common area maintenance. Mr. Eugene W. Landy, the Founder and Chairman of the Board, of the Company, owns a 24% interest in the entity that is the landlord of the property where the Company’sour corporate office space is currently located. We believe that the aforesaid rent is no more than what we would pay for comparable space elsewhere.

85

 

No director, executive officer, or any immediate family member of such director or executive officer may enter into any transaction or arrangement with the Companyus without the prior approval of the Board of Directors. If any such transaction or arrangement is proposed, the Board of Directors will appoint a Business Judgment Committee consisting of independent directors who are also independent of the transaction or arrangement. This Committee will recommend to the Board of Directors approval or disapproval of the transaction or arrangement. In determining whether to approve such a transaction or arrangement, the Business Judgment Committee will take into account, among other factors, whether the transaction was on terms no less favorable to the Companyus than terms generally available to third parties and the extent of the executive officer’s or director’s involvement in such transaction or arrangement. While the Company doeswe do not have specific written standards for approving such related party transactions, such transactions are only approved if it is in our best interest or in the best interest of the Company and itsour shareholders. Additionally, the Company’sour Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires all directors, officers and employees who may have a potential or apparent conflict of interest to immediately notify the Company’sour General Counsel. Further, to identify related party transactions, the Company submitswe submit and requiresrequire our directors and executive officers to complete director and officer questionnaires identifying any transactions with the Companyus in which the director, executive officer or their immediate family members have an interest.

 

See identification and other information relating to independent directors under Item 10.

89

 

ITEM 14 - PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP served as the Company’sour independent registered public accountants for the years ended September 30, 20162018 and 2015.2017. A representative from PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP is expected to be present at the annual shareholders’ meeting in order to be available to respond to possible inquiries from shareholders’.shareholders.

 

The following are fees billed by and accrued to PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP in connection with services rendered for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

 

 2016 2015  2018 2017 
Audit Fees $210,400  $203,450  $224,900  $217,000 
Audit Related Fees  32,100   4,200   31,100   40,300 
Tax Fees  54,400   47,500   51,400   49,500 
All Other Fees  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total Fees $296,900  $255,150  $307,400  $306,800 

 

Audit fees include professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’sour annual financial statements, management’s assessment of internal controls, and reviews of financial statements included in the Company’sour quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

 

Audit related fees include services that are normally provided by the Company’sour independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, such as consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Tax fees include professional services rendered for the preparation of the Company’sour federal and state corporate tax returns and supporting schedules as may be required by the Internal Revenue Service and applicable state taxing authorities. Tax fees also include other work directly affecting or supporting the payment of taxes, including planning and research of various tax issues.

 

All of the services performed by PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP for the Companyus during fiscal 20162018 were either expressly pre-approved by the Audit Committee or were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy, and the Audit Committee was provided with regular updates as to the nature of such services and fees paid for such services.

 

86

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

 

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services provided by the Company’sour principal independent accountants. The policy requires that all services provided by our independent registered public accountants to the Company,us, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services, must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, and all have been so approved. The pre-approval requirements do not prohibit day-to-day normal tax consulting services, which matters will not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate.

 

The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP’s independence.

 

 8790 

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

 PAGE(S)
  
(a) (1)The following Financial Statements are filed as part of this report: 
  
(i)(i)Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm9396
  
(ii)(ii)Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015201794-9597-98
  
(iii)(iii)Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014201696-9799-100
  
(iv)(iv)Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014201698101
  
(v)(v)Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014201699-100102-103
  
(vi)(vi)Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016101104
  
(vii)(vii)Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements102-138105-142
  
(a) (2)The following Financial Statement Schedule is filed as part of this report: 
  
(i)Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of September 30, 20162018139-147143-151

 

All other schedules are omitted for the reason that they are not required, are not applicable, or the required information is set forth in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes hereto.

 

 8891 

 

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONT’D)

 

(a)(3) Exhibits
   
(2) Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation, or Succession
   
2.1 

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 24, 2003 by and between MREIC Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Monmouth Maryland”), and Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Monmouth Delaware”), dated March 24, 2003 (incorporated by reference Appendix A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 7, 2003, Registration No. 000-04258). 

2.2Agreement and Plan of Merger Among Monmouth Capital Corporation, Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, and Route 9 Acquisition, Inc., dated as of March 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference Annex A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2007, Registration No. 001-33177).
   
(3) Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
   
3.1 

Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form S-3 filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 2009, Registration No. 333-161668).

3.2 

Articles Supplementary, effective December 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Form 8-A filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2006, Registration No. 001-33177).

3.3Articles of Amendment, effective April 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on April 19, 2010, Registration No. 001-33177).
   
3.43.3 Articles Supplementary, effective October 12, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on October 12, 2010, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.5Articles of Amendment, effective March 7, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2011, Registration No. 001-33177).
   
3.63.4 Articles of Amendment, effective January 26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on January 27, 2012, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.7

Articles Supplementary, effective June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5,January 27, 2012, Registration No. 001-33177).

3.8 

3.5Articles of Amendment, effective May 27, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5.03 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 28, 2014, Registration No. 001-33177).

 89 

3.93.6 Articles Supplementary, effective September 7, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the Form 8-A filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).
   
3.7Certificate of Correction, effective March 7, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.8Articles Supplementary, effective March 7, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.9

Articles Supplementary, effective June 29, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177).

3.10Articles Supplementary, effective August 2, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2018, Registration No. 001-33177).

92

 

3.11

Bylaws of the Company, as amended and restated, dated April 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2014, Registration No. 001-33177).

 


(4)
 Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
   
4.1 

Specimen certificate representing the common stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2015, Registration No. 001-33177).

   
4.2 Specimen certificate representing the Series A Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-A filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2006, Registration No. 001-33177).

4.3Specimen certificate representing the Series B Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the form S-11/A filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 29, 2012, Registration No. 333-181172).
4.4Specimen certificate representing the6.125% Series C Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the form 8-A filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).
   
(10) Material Contracts
   
10.1+

Employment Agreement with- Mr. Eugene W. Landy dated December 9, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Form 10-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 28, 1994).

   
10.2+

First Amendment to Employment Agreement with- Mr. Eugene W. Landy dated June 26, 1997 (incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Committee on December 10, 2009, Registration No. 001-33177).

   
10.3+

Second Amendment to Employment Agreement with- Mr. Eugene W. Landy dated November 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Committee on April 1, 2004, Registration No. 000-04248).

   
10.4+

Third Amendment to Employment Agreement of- Eugene W. Landy, dated April 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2008, Registration No. 001-33177).

   
10.5+

Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated July 13, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2010, Registration No. 001-33177).

   
10.6+

Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated April 25, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2013, Registration No. 001-33177).

 90 

10.7+

Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated December 20, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2013, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.8+

Seventh Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated December 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2014, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.9+

Eighth Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated January 12, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).

93

 

10.10+

Employment Agreement – Kevin S. Miller, dated December 28, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 28, 2012, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.11+

Employment Agreement – Kevin S. Miller, dated January 5, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.12
10.11+

Employment Agreement - Michael P. Landy, dated September 23, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K/A filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2013, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.13+

Employment Agreement - Michael P. Landy, dated January 11, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 11, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.14+ 

10.12Employment Agreement – Allison Nagelberg, dated January 6, 20143, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7, 2014,4, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.13

 

10.15+ 

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation’s 2007 Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Committee on March 26, 2010, Registration No.001-33177).

10.16+ *Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement
   
10.14Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation’s 2007 Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Committee on March 31, 2017, Registration No.001-33177).
 
10.1710.15+Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement and Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 and 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177)
 

10.16+Form of Indemnification Agreement between Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation and its Directors and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2012)2012, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.18  

10.17

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (incorporated by reference to Form S-3D filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on MarchJune 1, 2016,2018, Registration No. 333-209856)333-225374).

10.19  

10.18

Credit Agreement by and among Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, Bank of Montreal, as administrative agent, BMO Capital Markets, as sole lease arranger and sole book runner, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-syndication agents, dated as of August 27, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2015, Registration No. 001-33177).

 91

10.20  
10.19First Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, Bank of Montreal, as administrative agent, BMO Capital Markets, as sole lease arranger and sole book runner, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-syndication agents, dated as of September 30, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).
(12)*Statement of Computation of Ratios.
 
10.20Second Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, Bank of Montreal, as administrative agent, BMO Capital Markets, as sole lease arranger and sole book runner, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-syndication agents, dated as of March 22, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2018, Registration No. 001-33177).

94

10.21At-the-Market Sales Agreement by and between Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation and FBR Capital Markets & Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2018, Registration No. 001-33177).
   
(21)*Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
   
(23)*Consent of PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP.
   
(31.1)*Certification of Michael P. Landy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
(31.2)*Certification of Kevin S. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
(32.1)*Certification of Michael P. Landy, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kevin S. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

101.INS++XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH++XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL++XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
101.LAB++XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE++XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF++XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

*Filed herewith.
+Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
++Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive date file is deemed not “filed” or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

 

 9295 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (the “Company”) as of September 30, 20162018 and 20152017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016. Our audit also included2018, and the financial statementrelated notes and schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2)(i) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation atthe Company as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2016,2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 

We have also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20162018, based on criteria established inInternal Control-IntegratedControl–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)(COSO), and our report dated November 25, 201628, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.opinion.

 

/s/ PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP
New York, New York
November 25, 2016

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.

November 28, 2018

New York, New York

 

* * *

 

93

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,

  2016  2015 
ASSETS        
Real Estate Investments:        
Land $165,375,315  $133,500,315 
Buildings and Improvements  1,005,938,180   807,509,590 
Total Real Estate Investments  1,171,313,495   941,009,905 
Accumulated Depreciation  (148,830,169)  (124,898,639)
Net Real Estate Investments  1,022,483,326   816,111,266 
         
Cash and Cash Equivalents  95,749,508   12,073,909 
Securities Available for Sale at Fair Value  73,604,894   54,541,237 
Tenant and Other Receivables  1,444,824   783,052 
Deferred Rent Receivable  6,917,431   5,205,295 
Prepaid Expenses  4,830,987   3,931,616 
Financing Costs, net of Accumulated Amortization of
$3,399,232 and $3,247,014, respectively
  7,518,066   5,987,911 
Capitalized Lease Costs, net of Accumulated Amortization of
$3,238,516 and $2,534,521, respectively
  4,165,268   3,407,432 
Intangible Assets, net of Accumulated Amortization of
$12,332,599 and $11,153,855, respectively
  5,816,153   6,115,134 
Other Assets  7,227,571   7,835,090 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $1,229,758,028  $915,991,942 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

94

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONT’D)

AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,

  2016  2015 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Liabilities:        
Mortgage Notes Payable $483,748,153  $373,991,174 
Loans Payable  80,790,684   85,041,386 
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  53,493,750   -0- 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses  3,998,771   3,113,274 
Other Liabilities  9,868,572   7,835,468 
Total Liabilities  631,899,930   469,981,302 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
Shareholders’ Equity:        
7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: -0- and 2,139,750 Shares Authorized, Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively  -0-   53,493,750 
7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 2,300,000 Shares Authorized, Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and 2015  57,500,000   57,500,000 
6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 5,400,000 and -0- Shares Authorized, Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively  135,000,000   -0- 
Common Stock - $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 194,600,000 and 200,000,000 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively; 68,920,972 and 62,123,454 Shares Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively  689,210   621,235 
Excess Stock - $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 200,000,000 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2016 and 2015; No Shares Issued or Outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and 2015  -0-   -0- 
Additional Paid-In Capital  391,726,621   339,837,258 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  12,942,267   (5,441,603)
Undistributed Income  -0-   -0- 
Total Shareholders’ Equity  597,858,098   446,010,640 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $1,229,758,028  $915,991,942 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

95

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

  2016  2015  2014 
INCOME:            
Rental Revenue $81,592,429  $67,059,385  $55,512,165 
Reimbursement Revenue  13,323,681   10,716,112   9,160,176 
Lease Termination Income  -0-   238,625   1,182,890 
TOTAL INCOME  94,916,110   78,014,122   65,855,231 
             
EXPENSES:            
Real Estate Taxes  10,455,401   8,362,135   7,605,611 
Operating Expenses  4,273,899   4,127,884   3,711,868 
General & Administrative Expenses  7,936,124   6,305,928   5,709,937 
Acquisition Costs  730,441   1,546,088   481,880 
Depreciation  24,055,022   19,705,320   15,908,769 
Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and Intangible Assets  2,032,658   2,067,408   1,810,812 
TOTAL EXPENSES  49,483,545   42,114,763   35,228,877 
             
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):            
Dividend and Interest Income  5,616,392   3,723,867   3,882,597 
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions, net  4,398,599   805,513   2,166,766 
Interest Expense  (21,836,811)  (18,558,150)  (16,104,678)
Amortization of Financing Costs  (1,116,238)  (1,286,016)  (725,745)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)  (12,938,058)  (15,314,786)  (10,781,060)
             
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS  32,494,507   20,584,573   19,845,294 
             
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  -0-   5,021,242   -0- 
             
NET INCOME  32,494,507   25,605,815   19,845,294 
             
Less: Preferred Dividends  9,020,470   8,607,032   8,607,032 
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  2,942,149   -0-   -0- 
             
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS $20,531,888  $16,998,783  $11,238,262 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 96 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSBALANCE SHEETS

AS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

 

  2016  2015  2014 
BASIC INCOME – PER SHARE            
Net Income  0.50   0.43   0.40 
Less: Preferred Dividends  (0.14)  (0.14)  (0.17)
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  (0.05)  -0-   -0- 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders – Basic $0.31  $0.29  $0.23 
             
DILUTED INCOME – PER SHARE            
Net Income  0.50   0.43   0.40 
Less: Preferred Dividends  (0.14)  (0.14)  (0.17)
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  (0.05)  -0-   -0- 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders – Diluted $0.31  $0.29  $0.23 
             
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING            
Basic  65,468,564   59,085,888   49,829,924 
Diluted  65,558,284   59,201,296   49,925,036 
  2018  2017 
ASSETS        
Real Estate Investments:        
Land $224,719,083  $187,224,819 
Buildings and Improvements  1,494,859,336   1,244,691,715 
Total Real Estate Investments  1,719,578,419   1,431,916,534 
Accumulated Depreciation  (207,065,634)  (171,086,083)
Real Estate Investments  1,512,512,785   1,260,830,451 
         
Real Estate Held for Sale  -0-   14,631,633 
Cash and Cash Equivalents  9,324,585   10,226,046 
Securities Available for Sale at Fair Value  154,920,545   123,764,770 
Tenant and Other Receivables  1,249,434   1,753,054 
Deferred Rent Receivable  9,656,179   8,049,275 
Prepaid Expenses  6,189,796   5,434,874 
Intangible Assets, net of Accumulated Amortization of $13,699,519 and $13,404,318, respectively  14,589,756   10,010,165 
Capitalized Lease Costs, net of Accumulated Amortization of $3,271,481 and $3,393,187, respectively  5,231,845   4,180,907 
Financing Costs, net of Accumulated Amortization of $995,135 and $619,555, respectively  500,129   875,709 
Other Assets  4,202,832   3,280,871 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $1,718,377,886  $1,443,037,755 

 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 97 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSBALANCE SHEETS (CONT’D)

AS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

 

  2016  2015  2014 
          
Net Income $32,494,507  $25,605,815  $19,845,294 
Other Comprehensive Income:            
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Period  22,782,469   (4,757,446)  298,854 
Reclassification Adjustment for Net Gains of Sales of Securities Transactions Realized in Income  (4,398,599)  (805,513)  (2,166,766)
Total Comprehensive Income  50,878,377   20,042,856   17,977,382 
Less: Preferred Dividends  9,020,470   8,607,032   8,607,032 
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  2,942,149   -0-   -0- 
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $38,915,758  $11,435,824  $9,370,350 
  2018  2017 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Liabilities:        
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable, net of Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs $711,545,649  $591,364,371 
Loans Payable  186,608,676   120,091,417 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses  5,891,172   4,450,753 
Other Liabilities  16,426,622   14,265,518 
Total Liabilities  920,472,119   730,172,059 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
Shareholders’ Equity:        
6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 16,400,000 and 12,400,000 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively; 11,488,001 and 9,839,445 Shares Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively  287,200,025   245,986,125 
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 188,039,750 and 192,039,750 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively; 81,503,134 and 75,630,521 Shares Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively  815,031   756,305 
Excess Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 200,000,000 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2018 and 2017; No Shares Issued or Outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and 2017  -0-   -0- 
Additional Paid-In Capital  534,635,290   459,552,701 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  (24,744,579)  6,570,565 
Undistributed Income  -0-   -0- 
Total Shareholders’ Equity  797,905,767   712,865,696 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $1,718,377,886  $1,443,037,755 

 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 98 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017  2016 
INCOME:            
Rental Revenue $115,864,119  $97,659,778  $81,592,429 
Reimbursement Revenue  23,297,730   18,725,527   16,163,004 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0- 
TOTAL INCOME  139,372,110   116,385,305   97,755,433 
             
EXPENSES:            
Real Estate Taxes  18,596,239   15,266,634   13,294,724 
Operating Expenses  5,793,878   4,887,922   4,273,899 
General and Administrative Expenses  8,776,579   7,809,546   7,936,124 
Acquisition Costs  -0-   178,526   730,441 
Depreciation  36,175,923   29,634,998   24,055,022 
Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and Intangible Assets  2,391,104   1,824,751   2,032,658 
TOTAL EXPENSES  71,733,723   59,602,377   52,322,868 
             
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):            
Dividend and Interest Income  13,120,465   6,930,564   5,616,392 
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  111,387   2,311,714   4,398,599 
Interest Expense, including Amortization of Financing Costs  (32,349,705)  (25,754,121)  (22,953,049)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)  (19,117,853)  (16,511,843)  (12,938,058)
             
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS  48,520,534   40,271,085   32,494,507 
             
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments  7,485,266   -0-   -0- 
             
NET INCOME  56,005,800   40,271,085   32,494,507 
             
Less: Preferred Dividends  17,190,456   14,861,686   9,020,470 
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   2,467,165   2,942,149 
             

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

99

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017  2016 
BASIC INCOME – PER SHARE            
Net Income $0.71  $0.56  $0.50 
Less: Preferred Dividends  (0.22)  (0.21)  (0.14)
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   (0.03)  (0.05)
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders – Basic $0.49  $0.32  $0.31 
             
DILUTED INCOME – PER SHARE            
Net Income $0.71  $0.56  $0.50 
Less: Preferred Dividends  (0.22)  (0.21)  (0.14)
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   (0.03)  (0.05)
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders – Diluted $0.49  $0.32  $0.31 
             

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

            
Basic  78,619,440   72,114,078   65,468,564 
Diluted  78,802,208   72,249,691   65,558,284 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

100

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017  2016 
          
Net Income $56,005,800  $40,271,085  $32,494,507 
Other Comprehensive Income:            
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Period  (31,203,757)  (4,059,988)  22,782,469 
Reclassification Adjustment for Net Gains Realized in Income  (111,387)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)
Total Comprehensive Income  24,690,656   33,899,383   50,878,377 
Less: Preferred Dividends  17,190,456   14,861,686   9,020,470 
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   2,467,165   2,942,149 

Comprehensive Income Attributable to Common Shareholders

 $7,500,200  $16,570,532  $38,915,758 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

101

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, 2015,2018, 2017, AND 20142016

 

 Common
Stock
 Preferred
Stock Series A
 Preferred
Stock Series B
 Preferred
Stock Series C
 Additional
Paid in
Capital
  Common
Stock
 Preferred
Stock
Series A
 Preferred
Stock
Series B
 Preferred
Stock
Series C
 Additional
Paid in
Capital
 
Balance September 30, 2013 $444,885  $53,493,750  $57,500,000  $-0-  $222,487,068 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  42,961   -0-   -0-   -0-   38,047,373 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of Common Stock, net of offering costs  80,500   -0-   -0-   -0-   65,032,186 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  1,642   -0-   -0-   -0-   1,325,527 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  100   -0-   -0-   -0-   (100)
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   347,002 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (18,293,168)
Net Income  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Preferred Dividends  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Unrealized Net Holding Loss on Securities Availablefor Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Balance September 30, 2014  570,088   53,493,750   57,500,000   -0-   308,945,888 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  49,755   -0-   -0-   -0-   48,354,801 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  812   -0-   -0-   -0-   611,598 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  580   -0-   -0-   -0-   (580)
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   448,895 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (18,523,344)
Net Income  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Preferred Dividends  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Unrealized Net Holding Loss on Securities Availablefor Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Balance September 30, 2015  621,235   53,493,750   57,500,000   -0-   339,837,258  $621,235  $53,493,750  $57,500,000  $-0-  $339,837,258 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  65,157   -0-   -0-   -0-   72,110,640   65,157   -0-   -0-   -0-   72,110,640 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   135,000,000   (4,456,578)
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   135,000,000   (4,456,578)
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  -0-   (53,493,750)  -0-   -0-   2,930,649   -0-   (53,493,750)  -0-   -0-   2,930,649 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  2,450   -0-   -0-   -0-   1,880,850   2,450   -0-   -0-   -0-   1,880,850 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  400   -0-   -0-   -0-   (400)  400   -0-   -0-   -0-   (400)
Cancellation of Shares Related to Forfeiture of Restricted Stock Awards  (32)  -0-   -0-   -0-   32   (32)  -0-   -0-   -0-   32 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   926,465   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   926,465 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (21,502,295)  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (21,502,295)
Net Income  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Preferred Dividends  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Unrealized Net Holding Gain on Securities Availablefor Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 

Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment

  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Balance September 30, 2016 $689,210  $-0-  $57,500,000  $135,000,000  $391,726,621   689,210   -0-   57,500,000   135,000,000   391,726,621 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  66,327   -0-   -0-   -0-   91,865,504 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   75,000,000   (3,996,907)
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   35,986,125   (255,906)
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  -0-   -0-   (57,500,000)  -0-   2,467,165 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  650   -0-   -0-   -0-   468,650 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  110   -0-   -0-   -0-   (110)
Stock Compensation Expense  8   -0-   -0-   -0-   624,698 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (23,347,014)
Net Income  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Preferred Dividends  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 

Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment

  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Balance September 30, 2017  756,305   -0-   -0-   245,986,125   459,552,701 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  58,164   -0-   -0-   -0-   89,970,625 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   41,213,900   (1,120,250)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  400   -0-   -0-   -0-   569,200 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  125   -0-   -0-   -0-   (125)
Stock Compensation Expense  37   -0-   -0-   -0-   433,858 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- �� (14,770,719)
Net Income  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Preferred Dividends  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 

Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment

  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Balance September 30, 2018 $815,031  $-0-  $-0-  $287,200,025  $534,635,290 

 

 (1)Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 99102 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 AND 2014,2016, CONT’D.

 

 Undistributed
Income (Loss)
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total Shareholders’
Equity
  Undistributed
Income (Loss)
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 
Balance September 30, 2013 $-0-  $1,989,268  $335,914,971 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  -0-   -0-   38,090,334 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten PublicOffering of Common Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   65,112,686 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  -0-   -0-   1,327,169 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   347,002 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (11,238,262)  -0-   (29,531,430)
Net Income  19,845,294   -0-   19,845,294 
Preferred Dividends  (8,607,032)  -0-   (8,607,032)
Unrealized Net Holding Loss on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   (1,867,912)  (1,867,912)
Balance September 30, 2014  -0-   121,356   420,631,082 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  -0-   -0-   48,404,556 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  -0-   -0-   612,410 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   448,895 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (16,998,783)  -0-   (35,522,127)
Net Income  25,605,815   -0-   25,605,815 
Preferred Dividends  (8,607,032)  -0-   (8,607,032)
Unrealized Net Holding Loss on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   (5,562,959)  (5,562,959)
Balance September 30, 2015  -0-   (5,441,603)  446,010,640  $-0-  $(5,441,603) $446,010,640 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  -0-   -0-   72,175,797   -0-   -0-   72,175,797 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   130,543,422 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   130,543,422 
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  (2,942,149)  -0-   (53,505,250)  (2,942,149)  -0-   (53,505,250)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  -0-   -0-   1,883,300   -0-   -0-   1,883,300 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Cancellation of Shares Related to Forfeiture of Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   926,465   -0-   -0-   926,465 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (20,531,888)  -0-   (42,034,183)  (20,531,888)  -0-   (42,034,183)
Net Income  32,494,507   -0-   32,494,507   32,494,507   -0-   32,494,507 
Preferred Dividends  (9,020,470)  -0-   (9,020,470)  (9,020,470)  -0-   (9,020,470)
Unrealized Net Holding Gain on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   18,383,870   18,383,870 

Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment

  -0-   18,383,870   18,383,870 
Balance September 30, 2016 $-0-  $12,942,267  $597,858,098   -0-   12,942,267   597,858,098 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  -0-   -0-   91,931,831 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   71,003,093 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   35,730,219 
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  (2,467,165)  -0-   (57,500,000)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  -0-   -0-   469,300 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   624,706 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (22,942,234)  -0-   (46,289,248)
Net Income  40,271,085   -0-   40,271,085 
Preferred Dividends  (14,861,686)  -0-   (14,861,686)
Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   (6,371,702)  (6,371,702)
Balance September 30, 2017  -0-   6,570,565   712,865,696 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  -0-   -0-   90,028,789 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   40,093,650 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  -0-   -0-   569,600 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   433,895 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (38,815,344)  -0-   (53,586,063)
Net Income  56,005,800   -0-   56,005,800 
Preferred Dividends  (17,190,456)  -0-   (17,190,456)
Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   (31,315,144)  (31,315,144)
Balance September 30, 2018 $-0-  $(24,744,579) $797,905,767 

 

 (1)Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 100103 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

 

 2016  2015  2014  2018  2017  2016 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES                        
Net Income $32,494,507  $25,605,815  $19,845,294  $56,005,800  $40,271,085  $32,494,507 
Noncash Items Included in Net Income:                        
Depreciation & Amortization  27,203,918   23,058,744   18,445,326   39,788,010   32,694,009   27,203,918 
Stock Compensation Expense  926,465   448,895   347,002   433,895   624,706   926,465 
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions, net  (4,398,599)  (805,513)  (2,166,766)
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments  -0-   (5,021,242)  -0- 
Deferred Straight Line Rent  (1,972,588)  (1,027,927)  (1,709,821)
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (111,387)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)
(Gain) Loss on Sale of Real Estate Investments  (7,485,266)  95,336   -0- 
Changes in:                        
Tenant, Deferred Rent & Other Receivables  (1,640,504)  (800,203)  (922,107)
Tenant & Other Receivables  1,396,729   357,823   69,317 
Prepaid Expenses  (899,371)  (1,166,821)  (563,525)  (754,922)  (603,887)  (899,371)
Other Assets and Capitalized Lease Costs  (1,814,638)  (2,359,895)  (1,086,846)
Other Assets & Capitalized Lease Costs  (2,036,854)  15,353   (1,814,638)
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses & Other Liabilities  2,827,722   (897,495)  957,907   265,745   3,753,082   2,827,722 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES  54,699,500   38,062,285   34,856,285   85,529,162   73,867,866   54,699,500 
                        
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES                        
Purchase of Real Estate & Intangible Assets  (210,747,340)  (192,187,485)  (97,374,760)  (283,402,845)  (286,951,980)  (210,747,340)
Capital and Land Site Improvements  (21,566,561)  (10,541,656)  (19,674,128)
Proceeds on Sale of Real Estate  -0-   8,846,686   -0- 
Capital Improvements  (9,084,163)  (4,974,988)  (21,566,561)
Proceeds from Sale of Real Estate Investments  22,083,340   4,125,819   -0- 
Return of Deposits on Real Estate  2,950,000   3,100,000   2,050,000   450,000   3,400,000   2,950,000 
Deposits Paid on Acquisitions of Real Estate  (2,200,000)  (3,700,000)  (3,250,000)  (200,000)  (450,000)  (2,200,000)
Proceeds from Sale of Securities Available for Sale  2,620,166   17,274,946   22,774,768 
Purchase of Securities Available for Sale  (19,055,956)  (16,188,760)  (27,840,200)  (64,979,698)  (71,494,810)  (19,055,956)
Proceeds from Sale of Securities Available for Sale  22,774,768   16,201,480   14,279,391 
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (227,845,089)  (194,469,735)  (131,809,697)  (332,513,200)  (339,071,013)  (227,845,089)
                        
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES                        
Proceeds from Mortgage Notes Payable  153,428,485   122,173,058   62,905,000 
Principal Payments on Mortgage Notes Payable  (43,671,506)  (35,977,890)  (25,202,376)
Net (Repayments) Proceeds from Loans Payable  (4,250,702)  59,841,386   3,000,000 
Proceeds from Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable  175,160,000   188,809,000   153,428,485 
Principal Payments on Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable  (54,354,212)  (73,594,586)  (43,671,506)
Net Draws (Repayments) from Loans Payable  66,517,259   39,300,733   (4,250,702)
Financing Costs Paid on Debt  (2,646,393)  (2,917,663)  (2,070,790)  (1,469,914)  (2,190,098)  (2,646,393)
Proceeds from Underwritten Public Offering of Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  130,543,422   -0-   -0- 
Proceeds from Underwritten Public Offering of CommonStock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   65,112,686 
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock in the DRIP, netof Dividend Reinvestments  63,806,651   39,915,387   30,465,806 
Redemption of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock  -0-   (53,493,750)  -0- 
Redemption of 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock  -0-   (57,500,000)  -0- 
Proceeds from Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   71,003,093   130,543,422 
Proceeds from At-The-Market Preferred Equity Program, net of offering costs  40,093,650   35,733,885   -0- 
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock in the DRIP, net of Dividend Reinvestments  77,100,433   81,805,937   63,806,651 
Proceeds from the Exercise of Stock Options  1,883,300   612,410   1,327,169   569,600   469,300   1,883,300 
Preferred Dividends Paid  (8,607,032)  (8,607,032)  (8,607,032)  (16,876,532)  (14,500,474)  (8,607,032)
Common Dividends Paid, net of Reinvestments  (33,665,037)  (27,032,958)  (21,906,902)  (40,657,707)  (36,163,355)  (33,665,037)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  256,821,188   148,006,698   105,023,561   246,082,577   179,679,685   256,821,188 
                        
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  83,675,599   (8,400,752)  8,070,149   (901,461)  (85,523,462)  83,675,599 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year  12,073,909   20,474,661   12,404,512   10,226,046   95,749,508   12,073,909 
                        
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $95,749,508  $12,073,909  $20,474,661  $9,324,585  $10,226,046  $95,749,508 

 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 101104 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 20162018

 

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Description of the Business

 

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, (aa Maryland corporation) andcorporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (the Company) operate(we, our, us, the Company or MREIC), operates as a real estate investment trust (REIT), deriving its income primarily from real estate rental operations. We were founded in 1968 and are one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world. As of September 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, rental properties consisted of ninety-nine111 and ninety-one108 property holdings, respectively. These properties are located in thirty30 states: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. As of September 30, 2018, our weighted average lease maturity was approximately 8.1 years and our annualized average base rent per occupied square foot was $6.01. As of September 30, 2018, the weighted average building age, based on the square footage of our buildings, was 8.7 years. In addition, the Company holdswe own a portfolio of REIT securities which the Companywe generally limitslimit to no more than approximately 10% of itsour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).

 

Management views the Company as a single segment based on its method of internal reporting in addition to its allocation of capital and resources.

Use of Estimates

 

In preparing the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”)(U.S. GAAP), management iswe are required to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.estimates and assumptions.

 

Segment Reporting & Financial Information

Our primary business is the ownership and management of real estate properties. We invest in well-located, modern, single tenant, industrial buildings leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. We review operating and financial information for each property on an individual basis and, therefore, each property represents an individual operating segment. We evaluate financial performance using Net Operating Income (NOI) from property operations. NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure, which we define as recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses, such as insurance, utilities and repairs and maintenance. We have aggregated the properties into one reportable segment as the properties share similar long-term economic characteristics and have other similarities, including the fact that they are operated as industrial properties subject to long-term net leases primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries.

Principles of Consolidation and Non-controlling Interest

 

The consolidated financial statements include the Company and itsour wholly-owned subsidiaries. In 2005, the Companywe formed MREIC Financial, Inc., a taxable REIT subsidiary which has had no activity since inception. In 2007, the Companywe merged with Monmouth Capital Corporation (Monmouth Capital), with Monmouth Capital surviving as aour wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.subsidiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

At September 30, 2016, Monmouth Capital owns a 51% majority interest in Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLC (a New Jersey limited liability company) (Palmer Terrace). The Company consolidates the results of operations of Palmer Terrace. Non-controlling interest represents 49% of the members’ equity in Palmer Terrace and is included in Other Liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Buildings and Improvements

 

Buildings and improvements are stated at the lower of depreciated cost or net realizable value. Depreciation is computed based on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. These lives are 39 years for buildings and range from 53 to 39 years for improvements.

 

 102105 

 

The Company appliesWe apply Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360-10, Property, Plant & Equipment (ASC 360-10) to measure impairment in real estate investments. Rental properties are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected future cash flows (on an undiscounted basis without interest) from a rental property is less than its historical net cost basis. These expected future cash flows consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. Upon determination that an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, rental properties are reduced to their fair value. For properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the fair value of the property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the property measured at the time there is a commitment to sell the property and/or it is actively being marketed for sale. A property to be disposed of is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less its cost to sell. Subsequent to the date that a property is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded.

 

Gains (Losses) on Sale of Real Estate

 

Gains (losses) on the sale of real estate investments are recognized when the profit (loss) on a given sale is determinable, and the seller is not obliged to perform significant activities after the sale to earn such profit.profit (loss).

 

Acquisitions

 

The Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance withPrior to the provisionsadoption of ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805) which requires transaction costs, such as broker fees, transfer taxes, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional and consulting fees, related to acquisitions are expensed as incurred.

UponASU 2017-01, upon acquisition of a property, the Company allocateswe allocated the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, as if vacant, which generally consistconsisted of land, buildingsbuilding and intangible assets, including above and below market leases and in-place leases. The Company allocatesWe allocated the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property generally determined by third partythe third-party appraisal of the property obtained in conjunction with the purchase.

The purchase price iswas further allocated to acquired above and below market leases based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place lease rates over the remaining term. In addition, any remaining amounts of the purchase price arewere applied to in-place lease values based on management’sour evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. In-place leases that may have a customer relationship intangible value, including (but not limited to) the nature and extent of the existing relationshipsrelationship with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals arewere also considered. Acquired above and below market leases arewere amortized to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The value of in-place lease intangibles (including customer relationships) iswas amortized to amortization expense over the remaining lease term. If a tenant terminatesterminated its lease early, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvements, leasing commissions, deferred rent, and the in-place lease value iswas charged to expense.expense when there was a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the termination agreement were met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration, if any, is probable of collection.

 

As a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-01, effective April 1, 2017, we no longer account for our property acquisitions as business combinations and instead account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets. In an acquisition of assets, certain acquisition costs are capitalized to real estate investments as part of the purchase price as opposed to being expensed as Acquisition Costs under the previous accounting treatment for business combinations. Therefore, as of April 1, 2017, we are no longer required to expense our Acquisition Costs. In addition, acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business combination are accounted for as asset acquisitions whereby the consideration incurred is allocated to the individual assets acquired on a relative fair value basis.

Marketable Securities

 

Investments in securities available for sale primarily consist of marketable common and preferred stock securities of other REITs, which the Companywe generally limitslimit to no more than approximately 10% of itsour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). These marketable securities are all publicly-traded and purchased on the open market, through private transactions or through dividend reinvestment plans. These securities may be classified among three categories: held-to-maturity, trading, and available-for-sale. The CompanyWe normally holdshold REIT securities on a long termlong-term basis and hashave the ability and intent to hold securities to recovery, thereforerecovery. Therefore, as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015, the Company’s2017, our securities are all classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value based upon quoted market prices in active markets. Gains or losses on the sale of securities are based on average cost and are accounted for on a trade date basis. UnrealizedNet unrealized holding gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized. The change in the unrealized net holding gains (losses) is reflected as Comprehensive Income (Loss).

 

 103106 

The Company individually reviews and evaluates its marketable securities for impairment on a quarterly basis or when events or circumstances occur. The Company considers, among other things, credit aspects of the issuer, amount of decline in fair value over cost and length of time in a continuous loss position. The Company has developed a general policy of evaluating whether an unrealized loss is other than temporary. On a quarterly basis, the Company makes an initial review of every individual security in its portfolio. If the security is impaired, the Company first determines its intent and ability to hold this investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Next, the Company determines the length of time and the extent of the impairment. Barring other factors, including the downgrading of the security or the cessation of dividends, if the fair value of the security is below cost by less than 20% for less than 6 months and the Company has the intent and ability to hold the security, the security is deemed to be temporarily impaired. Otherwise, the Company reviews additional information to determine whether the impairment is other than temporary. The Company discusses and analyzes any relevant information known about the security, such as:

a.Whether the decline is attributable to adverse conditions related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or in a geographic area.
  
b.Any downgrading of the security by a rating agency.
c.Whether the financial condition of the issuer has deteriorated.
d.Status of dividends – Whether dividends have been reduced or eliminated, or scheduled interest payments have not been made.
e.Analysis of the underlying assets (including NAV analysis) using independent analysis or recent transactions.

The Company normally holds REIT securities on a long term basis and has the ability and intent to hold securities to recovery. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recognized in earnings and the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as the new cost basis.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and investments with an original maturity of three months or less. The Company maintains its cash in bank accounts in amounts that may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in these accounts in the past. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their current carrying amounts since all such items are short-term in nature.

Intangible Assets, Capitalized Lease Costs and Financing Costs

Intangible assets, consisting primarily of the value of in-place leases, are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Upon termination of a lease, the unamortized portion is charged to expense. The weighted-average amortization period upon acquisition for intangible assets recorded during 2016, 2015 and 2014 was 12 years, 13 years and 14 years, respectively.

Costs incurred in connection with the execution of leases are capitalized and amortized over the term of the respective leases. Unamortized lease costs are charged to expense upon cancellation of leases prior to the expiration of lease terms. Costs incurred in connection with obtaining mortgages and other financings and refinancings are deferred and are amortized over the term of the related obligations using the effective interest method. Unamortized costs are charged to expense upon prepayment of the obligation. Amortization expense related to these deferred leasing and financing costs were $2,072,120, $2,042,520 and $1,231,222 for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company estimates that aggregate amortization expense for existing assets will be approximately $1,936,000, $1,743,000, $1,550,000, $1,009,000 and $931,000 for the fiscal years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.

104

Revenue Recognition

Rental revenue from tenants with leases having scheduled rental increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Tenant recoveries related to the reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as the Company is generally the primary obligor and, with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, has discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the associated credit risk. These occupancy charges are recognized as earned.

The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of tenant and other receivables and deferred rent receivable which are estimated to be uncollectible. For accounts receivable the Company deems uncollectible, the Company uses the direct write-off method. The Company did not have an allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2016 and 2015.

Lease Termination Income

Lease Termination Income is recognized in operating revenues when there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration is probable of collection. Lease termination amounts are paid by tenants who want to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual term of the lease by agreement with the Company.

Of the Company’s ninety-nine properties, only three leases, representing 1.3% of the Company’s gross leasable area, contain an early termination provision, which are as follows: the Company’s lease with its tenant at its 26,340 square foot location in Ridgeland (Jackson), MS, the Company’s lease with its tenant at its 83,000 square foot location in Roanoke, VA and the Company’s lease with its tenant at its 102,135 square foot location in O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO.

Net Income Per Share

Basic Net Income per Share is calculated by dividing Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted Net Income per Common Share is calculated by dividing Net Income attributable to Common Shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the weighted-average number of net shares that would be issued upon exercise of stock options pursuant to the treasury stock method.

In addition, common stock equivalents of 89,720, 115,408 and 95,112 shares are included in the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, options to purchase -0-, 65,000 and 65,000 shares, respectively, were antidilutive.

Stock Compensation Plan

The Company accounts for awards of stock options and restricted stock in accordance with ASC 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation. ASC 718-10 requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and amortized over the service period (generally equal to the vesting period). The compensation cost for stock option grants is determined using option pricing models, intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date less estimated forfeitures. The compensation expense for restricted stock is recognized based on the fair value of the restricted stock awards less estimated forfeitures. The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the fair value of the Company’s stock on the grant date. Compensation costs of $926,465, $448,895 and $347,002 have been recognized in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in Note 9 to these consolidated financial statements are the assumptions and methodology used to calculate the fair value of stock options and restricted shares.

105

Income Tax

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company will not be taxed on the portion of its income which is distributed to shareholders, provided it distributes at least 90% of its taxable income, has at least 75% of its assets in real estate investments and meets certain other requirements for qualification as a REIT. The Company is subject to franchise taxes in several of the states in which the Company owns property.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, that, among other things, defines a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Based on its evaluation, the Company determined that it has no uncertain tax positions and no unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2016. The Company records interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as interest expense. As of September 30, 2016, the fiscal tax years 2013 through and including 2016 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. There are currently no federal tax examinations in progress.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of unrealized holding gains or losses arising during the period on securities available for sale, less any reclassification adjustments for net gains of sales of securities transactions realized in income.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements for the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation for the current year.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which relates to the accounting for employee share-based payments”. ASU 2016-09 addresses several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”. ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.

106

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. These changes becomebecame effective for the Company’sour fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. The Companymost significant change for us, once ASU 2016-01 was adopted, was the accounting treatment for our investments in marketable securities that are classified as available for sale. The accounting treatment used for our Consolidated Financial Statements through Fiscal 2018, was that our investments in marketable securities, classified as available for sale, were carried at fair value, with net unrealized holding gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized and the change in net unrealized holding gains and losses being reflected as comprehensive income (loss). Under ASU 2016-01, effective October 1, 2018, these marketable securities continue to be measured at fair value, however the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses are now recognized through net income. Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2018, unrealized net holding losses of $24,744,579 were reclassed to beginning retained earnings to recognize the unrealized losses previously recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets.

We individually review and evaluate our marketable securities for impairment on a quarterly basis or when events or circumstances occur. We consider, among other things, credit aspects of the issuer, amount of decline in fair value over cost and length of time in a continuous loss position. We have developed a general policy of evaluating whether an unrealized loss is currentlyother than temporary. On a quarterly basis, we make an initial review of every individual security in our portfolio. If the security is impaired, we first determine our intent and ability to hold this investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Next, we determine the length of time and the extent of the impairment. Barring other factors, including the downgrading of the security or the cessation of dividends, if the fair value of the security is below cost by less than 20% for less than 6 months and we have the intent and ability to hold the security, the security is deemed to be temporarily impaired. Otherwise, we review additional information to determine whether the impairment is other than temporary. We discuss and analyze any relevant information known about the security, such as:

a.Whether the decline is attributable to adverse conditions related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or in a geographic area.
b.Any downgrading of the security by a rating agency.
c.Whether the financial condition of the issuer has deteriorated.
d.Status of dividends – Whether dividends have been reduced or eliminated, or scheduled interest payments have not been made.
e.Analysis of the underlying assets (including NAV analysis) using independent analysis or recent transactions.

We normally hold REIT securities on a long-term basis and have the ability and intent to hold securities to recovery. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recognized in earnings and the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as the new cost basis.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and investments with an original maturity of three months or less. We maintain our cash in bank accounts in amounts that may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in these accounts in the processpast. The fair value of evaluating the impactcash and cash equivalents approximates their current carrying amounts since all such items are short-term in nature.

107

Intangible Assets, Capitalized Lease Costs and Financing Costs

Intangible assets, consisting primarily of the adoptionvalue of in-place leases, are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Upon termination of a lease, the unamortized portion is charged to expense. The weighted-average amortization period upon acquisition for intangible assets recorded during 2018, 2017 and 2016 was 12 years, 13 years and 12 years, respectively.

Costs incurred in connection with the execution of leases are capitalized and amortized over the term of the respective leases. Unamortized lease costs are charged to expense upon cancellation of leases prior to the expiration of lease terms. Costs incurred in connection with obtaining mortgages and other financings and refinancings are deferred and are amortized over the term of the related obligations using the effective interest method. Unamortized costs are charged to expense upon prepayment of the obligation. Amortization expense related to these deferred leasing and financing costs were $2,101,427, $2,089,259 and $2,072,120 for the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We estimate that aggregate amortization expense for existing assets will be approximately $2,128,000, $1,802,000, $1,553,000, $1,435,000 and $1,356,000 for the fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

Rental revenue from tenants with leases having scheduled rental increases are recognized on itsa straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Tenant recoveries related to the reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as we are generally the primary obligor and, with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, have discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the associated credit risk. These occupancy charges are recognized as earned.

When applicable, we provide an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of tenant and other receivables and deferred rent receivables, which are estimated to be uncollectible. For accounts receivables that we deem uncollectible, we use the direct write-off method. We did not have an allowance for doubtful accounts balance as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 and there were no write-off’s of any receivable accounts during the fiscal years ended 2018 and 2017.

Lease Termination Income

Lease Termination Income is recognized in operating revenues when there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration is probable of collection. Lease termination amounts are paid by tenants who want to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual term of the lease by agreement with us.

Only four of our 111 properties have leases that contain an early termination provision. These four properties contain approximately 184,000 total rentable square feet, representing less than 1% of our total rentable square feet. Our leases with early termination provisions are our 26,340 square foot location in Ridgeland (Jackson), MS, our 36,270 square foot location in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA, our 38,833 square foot location in Rockford, IL, and our 83,000 square foot location in Roanoke, VA. Each lease termination provision contains certain requirements that must be met in order to exercise each termination provision. These requirements include: the date termination can be exercised, the time frame that notice must be given by the tenant to us and the termination fee that would be required to be paid by the tenant to us. The total potential termination fee to be paid to us from the four tenants with leases that have a termination provision amounts to approximately $1,694,000.

108

Net Income Per Share

Basic Net Income per Common Share is calculated by dividing Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted Net Income per Common Share is calculated by dividing Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the weighted-average number of net shares that would be issued upon exercise of stock options pursuant to the treasury stock method.

In addition, common stock equivalents of 182,768, 135,613 and 89,720 shares are included in the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, options to purchase 65,000, 65,000 and -0- shares, respectively, were antidilutive.

Stock Compensation Plan

We account for awards of stock, stock options and restricted stock in accordance with ASC 718-10, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. ASC 718-10 requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and amortized over the service period (generally equal to the vesting period). The compensation cost for stock option grants is determined using option pricing models, intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date less estimated forfeitures. The compensation expense for restricted stock is recognized based on the fair value of the restricted stock awards less estimated forfeitures. The fair value of stock awards and restricted stock awards is equal to the fair value of our stock on the grant date. The amortization of compensation costs for the awards of stock, stock option grants and restricted stock are included in General and Administrative Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income and amounted to $433,895, $624,706 and $926,465 have been recognized in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Included in Note 9 to these consolidated financial statements are the assumptions and hasmethodology used to calculate the fair value of stock options and restricted shares.

Income Tax

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Code, and we intend to maintain our qualification as a REIT in the future. As a qualified REIT, with limited exceptions, we will not determinedbe taxed under Federal and certain state income tax laws at the effectscorporate level on taxable income that we distribute to our shareholders. For special tax provisions applicable to REITs, refer to Sections 856-860 of this update on the Company’s financial position, resultsCode. We are subject to franchise taxes in several of operations or cash flows and disclosures at this time.the states in which we own properties.

 

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the TCJA), Code Section 199A, was added to the Code and became effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026. Under the TCJA, subject to certain income limitations, individual taxpayers and trusts and estates may deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of qualified REIT dividends they receive from their taxable income. Qualified REIT dividends do not include any portion of a dividend received from a REIT that is classified as a capital gain dividend or qualified dividend income.

We follow the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, that, among other things, defines a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Based on our evaluation, we determined that we have no uncertain tax positions and no unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2018. We record interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as interest expense. As of September 30, 2018, the fiscal tax years 2015 through and including 2018 remain open to examination by the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “SimplifyingInternal Revenue Service. There are currently no federal tax examinations in progress.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income consists of unrealized holding gains or losses arising during the Accountingperiod on securities available for Measurement-Period Adjustments”. ASU 2015-16 eliminatessale, less any reclassification adjustments for net gains of sales of securities transactions realized in income.

109

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the requirement to restate prior periodconsolidated financial statements for measurement period adjustments.the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation for the current year.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, “Leases”. ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The new guidancestandard requires thata modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the cumulative impactdate of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified.initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2015-16 is2016-02 will become effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption2018. The most significant changes related to lessor accounting under ASU 2016-02 include bifurcating revenue into lease and non-lease components and the new standard’s narrow definition of initial direct costs for leases. Since our revenue is permitted. The Company doesprimarily derived from leasing activities from long-term net leases and since we currently do not expectcapitalize indirect costs for leases, we believe that will continue to account for our leases and related leasing costs in substantially the same manner as we currently do once the adoption of the ASU 2015-162016-02 becomes effective.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases”. The amendment in ASU 2018-10 affects narrow aspects of the guidance issued earlier in ASU 2016-02 by removing certain inconsistencies and providing additional clarification related to the guidance issued earlier. ASU 2018-10 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have a material effect on the Company’sour consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2015,January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Interest (Topic 835): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. ASU 2015-032016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that debt issuance costs relatedresult in consolidation of the investee) to abe measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized debt liabilityin net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be presenteddisclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. These changes became effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. The most significant change for us, once ASU 2016-01 was adopted, was the accounting treatment for our investments in the balance sheetmarketable securities that are classified as available for sale. The accounting treatment used for our Consolidated Financial Statements through Fiscal 2018, was that our investments in marketable securities, classified as available for sale, were carried at fair value, with net unrealized holding gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reported as a direct deduction fromseparate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized and the carrying amountchange in net unrealized holding gains and losses being reflected as comprehensive income (loss). Under ASU 2016-01, effective October 1, 2018, these marketable securities continue to be measured at fair value, however the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses are now recognized through net income. Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2018, unrealized net holding losses of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by$24,744,579 were reclassed to beginning retained earnings to recognize the amendmentsunrealized losses previously recorded in this update. The amendments in ASU 2015-03 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets.

In August 2015,May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Line-of-Credit Arrangements” providing guidance regarding the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance on this matter, the SEC staff would not object toCustomers, which requires an entity deferringto recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers”. The FASB issued further guidance in ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and presenting debt issuance costs as an assetPractical Expedients”, that provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the termadds some practical expedients. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The effective date of ASU 2014-09 was extended by one year by ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on that line-of-credit arrangement.Effective Date”. The Companynew standard is currently ineffective for the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810), “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis”. ASU 2015-02 focuses to minimize situations under previously existing guidance in which afirst interim period within annual reporting entity was required to consolidate another legal entity in which that reporting entity did not have: (1) the ability through contractual rights to act primarily on its own behalf; (2) ownership of the majority of the legal entity’s voting rights; or (3) the exposure to a majority of the legal entity’s economic benefits. ASU 2015-02 affects reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. ASU 2015-02 will be effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption2017. Therefore, we adopted the standard effective October 1, 2018. Our revenue is permitted, including adoptionprimarily derived from leasing activities and historically our property dispositions have been cash sales with no contingencies and no future involvement in an interim period. The Company does not expectthe property. Since this standard applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other guidance, such as leases, the adoption of ASU 2015-02 tothis standard did not have a material effectsignificant impact on the Company’sour consolidated financial statements.statements and related disclosures.

 

110

Management does

We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

107

 

NOTE 2 – REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

 

The following is a summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of the Company’sour land, buildings and improvements at September 30, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
  Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
Alabama:                  
Huntsville Industrial $748,115  $5,857,016  $936,862  $5,668,269 
Arizona:                  
Tolleson (Phoenix) Industrial  1,316,075   15,508,151   5,115,610   11,708,616 
Colorado:                  
Colorado Springs Industrial  1,270,000   5,934,472   1,490,351   5,714,121 
Colorado Springs Industrial  2,150,000   26,350,000   225,214   28,274,786 
Denver Industrial  1,150,000   5,204,051   1,437,516   4,916,535 
Connecticut:                  
Newington (Hartford) Industrial  410,000   3,053,824   1,207,938   2,255,886 
Florida:                  
Cocoa Industrial  1,881,316   12,246,133   2,113,243   12,014,206 
Davenport (Orlando) Industrial  7,060,000   30,720,000   131,282   37,648,718 
Ft. Myers Industrial  1,910,000   3,107,447   991,678   4,025,769 
Jacksonville (FDX) Industrial  1,165,000   5,081,404   2,295,680   3,950,724 
Jacksonville (FDX Ground) Industrial  6,000,000   24,645,954   1,053,246   29,592,708 
Lakeland Industrial  261,000   1,721,532   466,240   1,516,292 
Orlando Industrial  2,200,000   6,354,432   1,471,814   7,082,618 
Punta Gorda Industrial  -0-   4,113,265   833,789   3,279,476 
Tampa (FDX Ground) Industrial  5,000,000   14,696,102   4,161,734   15,534,368 
Tampa (FDX) Industrial  2,830,000   4,762,861   1,258,519   6,334,342 
Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) Industrial  1,867,000   3,810,982   941,848   4,736,134 
Georgia:                  
Augusta (FDX Ground) Industrial  614,406   4,739,628   1,258,944   4,095,090 
Augusta (FDX) Industrial  380,000   1,591,732   367,357   1,604,375 
Griffin (Atlanta) Industrial  760,000   14,108,857   3,767,103   11,101,754 
Illinois:                  
Burr Ridge (Chicago) Industrial  270,000   1,422,901   656,159   1,036,742 
Elgin (Chicago) Industrial  1,280,000   5,652,916   2,124,899   4,808,017 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  340,000   12,202,814   4,485,359   8,057,455 
Montgomery (Chicago) Industrial  2,000,000   9,298,367   2,282,887   9,015,480 
Rockford (B/E Aerospace) Industrial  480,000   4,620,000   236,923   4,863,077 
Rockford (Sherwin-Williams) Industrial  1,100,000   4,451,227   628,612   4,922,615 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  1,890,000   13,314,950   682,605   14,522,345 
Schaumburg (Chicago) Industrial  1,039,800   3,941,614   2,037,309   2,944,105 
Wheeling (Chicago) Industrial  5,112,120   13,425,532   3,735,969   14,801,683 
Indiana:                  
Greenwood (Indianapolis) Industrial  2,250,000   35,250,391   1,280,020   36,220,371 
Indianapolis Industrial  3,500,000   20,446,000   1,132,868   22,813,132 
Iowa:                  
Urbandale (Des Moines) Industrial  310,000   1,851,895   1,094,293   1,067,602 
Kansas:                  
Edwardsville (Kansas City)(Carlisle Tire) Industrial  1,185,000   6,040,401   2,158,091   5,067,310 
Edwardsville (Kansas City)(International Paper) Industrial  2,750,000   15,544,108   1,172,549   17,121,559 
Olathe (Kansas City) Industrial  2,350,000   29,387,000   125,585   31,611,415 
Topeka Industrial  -0-   3,679,843   707,765   2,972,078 
Kentucky:                  
Buckner (Louisville) Industrial  2,280,000   24,487,852   1,834,166   24,933,686 
Frankfort (Lexington) Industrial  1,850,000   26,150,000   1,229,274   26,770,726 
Louisville Industrial  1,590,000   9,714,000   83,026   11,220,974 
Louisiana:                  
Covington (New Orleans) Industrial  2,720,000   15,690,000   335,256   18,074,744 

108

SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 (cont’d) Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
  Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
Maryland:                  
Beltsville (Washington, DC) Industrial $3,200,000  $11,312,355  $3,536,076  $10,976,279 
Michigan:                  
Livonia (Detroit) Industrial  320,000   13,442,030   1,350,345   12,411,685 
Orion Industrial  4,649,971   18,235,665   3,549,648   19,335,988 
Romulus (Detroit) Industrial  531,000   4,069,532   1,804,248   2,796,284 
Minnesota:                  
Stewartville (Rochester) Industrial  900,000   4,320,000   332,308   4,887,692 
White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul) Industrial  1,393,000   3,764,126   927,965   4,229,161 
Mississippi:                  
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Anda Distribution) Industrial  800,000   13,750,000   1,498,397   13,051,603 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool) Industrial  2,550,000   34,364,917   2,275,368   34,639,549 
Richland (Jackson) Industrial  211,000   1,689,691   826,199   1,074,492 
Ridgeland (Jackson) Industrial  218,000   1,640,591   1,177,386   681,205 
Missouri:                  
Kansas City (Bunzl) Industrial  1,000,000   8,600,000   422,650   9,177,350 
Kansas City (Kellogg) Industrial  660,000   4,140,474   1,022,653   3,777,821 
Liberty (Kansas City) Industrial  723,000   6,674,881   3,152,489   4,245,392 
O’Fallon (St. Louis) Industrial  264,000   3,981,913   2,096,073   2,149,840 
St. Joseph Industrial  800,000   12,433,706   4,756,910   8,476,796 
Nebraska:                  
Omaha Industrial  1,170,000   4,774,691   2,109,230   3,835,461 
New Jersey:                  
Carlstadt (New York, NY) Industrial  1,194,000   3,709,589   849,584   4,054,005 
Somerset Shopping Center  34,316   3,038,565   1,399,343   1,673,538 
New York:                  
Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Industrial  4,796,765   6,164,058   1,531,509   9,429,314 
Halfmoon (Albany) Industrial  1,190,000   4,335,600   500,262   5,025,338 
Orangeburg (New York) Industrial  694,720   3,200,955   2,319,253   1,576,422 
North Carolina:                  
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,305,000   27,670,897   650,384   31,325,513 
Fayetteville Industrial  172,000   5,269,876   2,458,876   2,983,000 
Winston-Salem Industrial  980,000   6,258,613   2,185,430   5,053,183 
Ohio:                  
Bedford Heights (Cleveland) Industrial  990,000   5,873,879   1,521,396   5,342,483 
Cincinnati Industrial  800,000   5,950,000   165,278   6,584,722 
Lebanon (Cincinnati) Industrial  240,000   4,212,425   485,114   3,967,311 
Monroe (Cincinnati) Industrial  1,800,000   11,137,000   452,143   12,484,857 
Richfield (Cleveland) Industrial  2,676,848   13,758,630   2,373,693   14,061,785 
Streetsboro (Cleveland) Industrial  1,760,000   17,840,000   2,058,462   17,541,538 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) Industrial  695,000   5,033,690   1,947,128   3,781,562 
Oklahoma:                  
Oklahoma City Industrial  1,410,000   11,170,262   1,014,638   11,565,624 
Tulsa Industrial  790,000   2,958,031   227,268   3,520,763 
Pennsylvania:                  
Altoona Industrial  1,200,000   7,808,650   583,052   8,425,598 
Imperial (Pittsburgh) Industrial  3,700,000   16,250,000   243,056   19,706,944 
Monaca (Pittsburgh) Industrial  401,716   7,404,507   2,331,288   5,474,935 
South Carolina:                  
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) Industrial  1,670,000   13,743,307   1,949,873   13,463,434 
Hanahan (Charleston)(SAIC) Industrial  1,129,000   12,211,592   3,577,226   9,763,366 
Hanahan (Charleston)(FDX Ground) Industrial  930,000   6,684,653   1,724,191   5,890,462 
Tennessee:                  
Chattanooga Industrial  300,000   4,712,203   1,131,706   3,880,497 
Lebanon (Nashville) Industrial  2,230,000   11,985,126   1,536,542   12,678,584 

109

SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 (cont’d) Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
  Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Memphis Industrial $1,240,887  $13,380,000  $2,230,008  $12,390,879 
Shelby County Vacant Land  11,065   -0-   -0-   11,065 
Texas:                  
Carrollton (Dallas) Industrial  1,500,000   16,269,106   2,708,020   15,061,086 
Corpus Christi Industrial  -0-   4,764,500   549,750   4,214,750 
Edinburg Industrial  1,000,000   10,423,872   907,803   10,516,069 
El Paso Industrial  3,225,195   9,205,997   1,442,146   10,989,046 
Fort Worth (Dallas) Industrial  8,200,000   27,100,832   810,709   34,490,123 
Houston Industrial  1,730,000   6,353,107   1,080,294   7,002,813 
Lindale (Tyler) Industrial  540,000   9,390,000   481,538   9,448,462 
Spring (Houston) Industrial  1,890,000   17,393,798   1,183,663   18,100,135 
Waco Industrial  1,350,000   11,196,157   923,263   11,622,894 
Virginia:                  
Charlottesville Industrial  1,170,000   3,178,499   1,393,226   2,955,273 
Mechanicsville (Richmond) (FDX) Industrial  1,160,000   6,598,181   2,644,156   5,114,025 
Richmond (United Technologies) Industrial  446,000   4,322,309   1,229,737   3,538,572 
Roanoke (CHEP) Industrial  1,853,000   5,552,447   1,329,033   6,076,414 
Roanoke (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,740,000   8,460,000   714,038   9,485,962 
Washington:                  
Burlington (Seattle/Everett) Industrial  8,000,000   22,210,680   284,752   29,925,928 
Wisconsin:                  
Cudahy (Milwaukee) Industrial  980,000   8,402,361   2,853,810   6,528,551 
Green Bay Industrial  590,000   5,980,000   460,000   6,110,000 
                   
Total as of September 30, 2016   $165,375,315  $1,005,938,180  $148,830,169  $1,022,483,326 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
  Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
Alabama:                  
Huntsville Industrial $748,115  $4,003,626  $821,527  $3,930,214 
Arizona:                  
Tolleson (Phoenix) Industrial  1,316,075   13,852,511   4,669,262   10,499,324 
Colorado:                  
Colorado Springs Industrial  1,270,000   5,925,115   1,336,829   5,858,286 
Denver Industrial  1,150,000   5,204,051   1,304,213   5,049,838 
Connecticut:                  
Newington (Hartford) Industrial  410,000   3,053,824   1,129,167   2,334,657 
Florida:                  
Cocoa Industrial  1,881,316   12,208,527   1,793,254   12,296,589 
Ft. Myers Industrial  1,910,000   3,107,447   913,073   4,104,374 
Jacksonville (FDX) Industrial  1,165,000   5,064,421   2,145,184   4,084,237 
Jacksonville (FDX Ground) Industrial  6,000,000   24,645,954   421,298   30,224,656 
Lakeland Industrial  261,000   1,705,211   406,472   1,559,739 
Orlando Industrial  2,200,000   6,341,237   1,307,147   7,234,090 
Punta Gorda Industrial  -0-   4,104,915   742,718   3,362,197 
Tampa (FDX Ground) Industrial  5,000,000   13,448,962   3,799,846   14,649,116 
Tampa (FDX) Industrial  2,830,000   4,735,717   1,135,794   6,429,923 
Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) Industrial  1,867,000   3,784,066   841,103   4,809,963 
Georgia:                  
Augusta (FDX Ground) Industrial  614,406   4,714,467   1,137,702   4,191,171 
Augusta (FDX) Industrial  380,000   1,567,032   321,283   1,625,749 
Griffin (Atlanta) Industrial  760,000   14,108,857   3,405,334   11,463,523 

110

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 (cont’d) Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
  Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
Illinois:                  
Burr Ridge (Chicago) Industrial $270,000  $1,414,201  $613,666  $1,070,535 
Elgin (Chicago) Industrial  1,280,000   5,646,956   1,976,098   4,950,858 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  340,000   12,046,675   4,171,237   8,215,438 
Montgomery (Chicago) Industrial  2,000,000   9,298,367   2,043,560   9,254,807 
Rockford (B/E Aerospace) Industrial  480,000   4,620,000   118,462   4,981,538 
Rockford (Sherwin-Williams) Industrial  1,100,000   4,451,227   512,938   5,038,289 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  1,890,000   13,310,000   341,282   14,858,718 
Schaumburg (Chicago) Industrial  1,039,800   3,927,839   1,932,902   3,034,737 
Wheeling (Chicago) Industrial  5,112,120   13,425,532   3,392,350   15,145,302 
Indiana:                  
Greenwood (Indianapolis) Industrial  2,250,000   35,234,574   376,438   37,108,136 
Indianapolis Industrial  3,500,000   20,446,000   608,611   23,337,389 
Iowa:                  
Urbandale (Des Moines) Industrial  310,000   1,851,895   1,042,050   1,119,845 
Kansas:                  
Edwardsville (Kansas City)(Carlisle Tire) Industrial  1,185,000   6,040,401   1,957,985   5,267,416 
Edwardsville (Kansas City)(International Paper) Industrial  2,750,000   15,538,753   757,934   17,530,819 
Topeka Industrial  -0-   3,679,843   613,406   3,066,437 
Kentucky:                  
Buckner (Louisville) Industrial  2,280,000   24,439,716   1,199,729   25,519,987 
Frankfort (Lexington) Industrial  1,850,000   26,150,000   558,761   27,441,239 
Maryland:                  
Beltsville (Washington, DC) Industrial  3,200,000   11,267,755   3,230,319   11,237,436 
Michigan:                  
Livonia (Detroit) Industrial  320,000   13,410,533   1,002,083   12,728,450 
Orion Industrial  4,649,971   18,229,798   3,080,057   19,799,712 
Romulus (Detroit) Industrial  531,000   4,069,532   1,691,732   2,908,800 
Minnesota:                  
Stewartville (Rochester) Industrial  900,000   4,320,000   221,538   4,998,462 
White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul) Industrial  1,393,000   3,764,126   831,891   4,325,235 
Mississippi:                  
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Anda Distribution) Industrial  800,000   13,750,000   1,145,833   13,404,167 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool) Industrial  2,550,000   24,952,797   1,592,066   25,910,731 
Richland (Jackson) Industrial  211,000   1,689,691   748,265   1,152,426 
Ridgeland (Jackson) Industrial  218,000   1,632,794   1,109,322   741,472 
Missouri:                  
Kansas City (Bunzl) Industrial  1,000,000   8,600,000   202,137   9,397,863 
Kansas City (Kellogg) Industrial  660,000   4,088,374   901,195   3,847,179 
Liberty (Kansas City) Industrial  723,000   6,650,618   2,973,407   4,400,211 
O’Fallon (St. Louis) Industrial  264,000   3,981,913   1,963,226   2,282,687 
St. Joseph Industrial  800,000   12,382,772   4,423,009   8,759,763 
Nebraska:                  
Omaha Industrial  1,170,000   4,767,281   1,984,805   3,952,476 
New Jersey:                  
Carlstadt (New York, NY) Industrial  1,194,000   3,695,712   767,084   4,122,628 
Somerset Shopping Center  34,316   2,660,928   1,318,964   1,376,280 
New York:                  
Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Industrial  4,796,765   6,164,058   1,370,655   9,590,168 
Halfmoon (Albany) Industrial  1,190,000   4,335,600   389,092   5,136,508 
Orangeburg (New York) Industrial  694,720   3,200,955   2,201,868   1,693,807 
North Carolina:                  
Fayetteville Industrial  172,000   4,712,522   2,229,107   2,655,415 
  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Alabama:                  
Huntsville Industrial $748,115  $5,913,696  $1,249,093  $5,412,718 
Mobile Industrial  2,480,474   30,571,842   195,973   32,856,343 
Arizona:                  
Tolleson (Phoenix) Industrial  1,316,075   15,508,151   6,144,623   10,679,603 
Colorado:                  
Colorado Springs Industrial  2,150,000   27,170,066   1,593,580   27,726,486 
Denver Industrial  1,150,000   5,204,051   1,704,122   4,649,929 
Connecticut:                  
Newington (Hartford) Industrial  410,000   3,084,108   1,377,254   2,116,854 
Florida:                  
Cocoa Industrial  1,881,316   12,246,133   2,758,147   11,369,302 
Davenport (Orlando) Industrial  7,060,000   30,720,000   1,706,667   36,073,333 
Daytona Beach Industrial  3,119,640   26,853,559   344,276   29,628,923 
Ft. Myers (FDX Ground) Industrial  2,486,417   19,177,218   842,928   20,820,707 
Homestead (Miami) Industrial  4,426,727   33,446,393   1,072,000   36,801,120 
Jacksonville (FDX) Industrial  1,165,000   5,231,958   2,619,003   3,777,955 
Jacksonville (FDX Ground) Industrial  6,000,000   24,735,702   2,323,375   28,412,327 
Lakeland Industrial  261,000   1,782,226   573,621   1,469,605 
Orlando Industrial  2,200,000   6,574,524   1,830,818   6,943,706 
Punta Gorda Industrial  -0-   4,133,510   1,058,498   3,075,012 
Tampa (FDX Ground) Industrial  5,000,000   14,701,575   4,921,899   14,779,676 
Tampa (FDX) Industrial  2,830,000   5,027,120   1,515,388   6,341,732 
Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) Industrial  1,867,000   3,810,982   1,144,249   4,533,733 
Georgia:                  
Augusta (FDX Ground) Industrial  614,406   4,748,899   1,509,465   3,853,840 
Augusta (FDX) Industrial  380,000   1,597,779   463,245   1,514,534 
Braselton (Atlanta) Industrial  13,964,652   46,262,482   98,855   60,128,279 
Griffin (Atlanta) Industrial  760,000   14,173,683   4,493,178   10,440,505 
Savannah Industrial  4,404,988   51,620,957   882,410   55,143,535 
Illinois:                  
Burr Ridge (Chicago) Industrial  270,000   1,422,901   741,290   951,611 
Elgin (Chicago) Industrial  1,280,000   5,697,442   2,436,368   4,541,074 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  340,000   12,357,848   5,183,974   7,513,874 
Montgomery (Chicago) Industrial  2,000,000   9,303,317   2,761,952   8,541,365 
Rockford (Collins Aerospace) Industrial  480,000   4,620,000   473,846   4,626,154 
Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Co.) Industrial  1,100,000   4,451,227   859,960   4,691,267 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  1,890,000   13,314,950   1,366,159   13,838,791 
Schaumburg (Chicago) Industrial  1,039,800   4,138,140   2,283,345   2,894,595 
Wheeling (Chicago) Industrial  5,112,120   13,870,354   4,430,770   14,551,704 
Indiana:                  
Greenwood (Indianapolis) Industrial  2,250,000   35,262,071   3,091,837   34,420,234 
Indianapolis Industrial  3,745,572   21,758,510   2,239,839   23,264,243 

 

 111 

 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 (cont’d) Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
  Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Winston-Salem Industrial $980,000  $5,942,086  $1,980,737  $4,941,349 
Ohio:                  
Bedford Heights (Cleveland) Industrial  990,000   5,789,591   1,337,898   5,441,693 
Cincinnati Industrial  800,000   5,950,000   12,714   6,737,286 
Lebanon (Cincinnati) Industrial  240,000   4,212,425   375,609   4,076,816 
Monroe (Cincinnati) Industrial  1,800,000   11,137,000   166,579   12,770,421 
Richfield (Cleveland) Industrial  2,676,848   13,758,630   2,016,458   14,419,020 
Streetsboro (Cleveland) Industrial  1,760,000   17,840,000   1,601,026   17,998,974 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) Industrial  695,000   5,033,690   1,768,517   3,960,173 
Oklahoma:                  
Oklahoma City Industrial  1,410,000   11,183,873   723,874   11,869,999 
Tulsa Industrial  790,000   2,958,031   145,342   3,602,689 
Pennsylvania:                  
Altoona Industrial  1,200,000   7,790,000   382,842   8,607,158 
Monaca (Pittsburgh) Industrial  401,716   7,367,252   2,023,850   5,745,118 
South Carolina:                  
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) Industrial  1,670,000   13,743,307   1,597,480   13,815,827 
Hanahan (Charleston) (SAIC) Industrial  1,129,000   12,171,592   3,199,452   10,101,140 
Hanahan (Charleston) (FDX Ground) Industrial  930,000   6,684,653   1,550,717   6,063,936 
Tennessee:                  
Chattanooga Industrial  300,000   4,671,161   1,003,292   3,967,869 
Lebanon (Nashville) Industrial  2,230,000   11,985,126   1,229,231   12,985,895 
Memphis Industrial  1,240,887   13,380,000   1,886,931   12,733,956 
Shelby County Vacant Land  11,065   -0-   -0-   11,065 
Texas:                  
Carrollton (Dallas) Industrial  1,500,000   16,244,300   2,290,543   15,453,757 
Corpus Christi Industrial  -0-   4,764,500   427,583   4,336,917 
Edinburg Industrial  1,000,000   6,438,483   742,117   6,696,366 
El Paso Industrial  3,225,195   9,205,997   1,176,363   11,254,829 
Fort Worth (Dallas) Industrial  8,200,000   27,100,832   115,816   35,185,016 
Houston Industrial  1,730,000   6,353,107   913,317   7,169,790 
Lindale (Tyler) Industrial  540,000   9,390,000   240,769   9,689,231 
Spring (Houston) Industrial  1,890,000   17,337,523   738,390   18,489,133 
Waco Industrial  1,350,000   11,196,157   636,182   11,909,975 
Virginia:                  
Charlottesville Industrial  1,170,000   3,174,037   1,295,758   3,048,279 
Mechanicsville (Richmond) (FDX) Industrial  1,160,000   6,579,671   2,465,144   5,274,527 
Richmond (United Technologies) Industrial  446,000   4,314,769   1,049,842   3,710,927 
Roanoke (CHEP) Industrial  1,853,000   5,552,447   1,140,757   6,264,690 
Roanoke (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,740,000   8,460,000   497,115   9,702,885 
Wisconsin:                  
Cudahy (Milwaukee) Industrial  980,000   8,393,672   2,633,457   6,740,215 
Green Bay Industrial  590,000   5,980,000   306,667   6,263,333 
                   
Total as of September 30, 2015   $133,500,315  $807,509,590  $124,898,639  $816,111,266 
  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Iowa:                  
Urbandale (Des Moines) Industrial $310,000  $2,213,644  $1,211,364  $1,312,280 
Kansas:                  
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlisle Tire) Industrial  1,185,000   6,047,986   2,538,608   4,694,378 
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) Industrial  2,750,000   15,544,108   2,001,778   16,292,330 
Olathe (Kansas City) Industrial  2,350,000   29,387,000   1,632,611   30,104,389 
Topeka Industrial  -0-   3,679,843   896,483   2,783,360 
Kentucky:                  
Buckner (Louisville) Industrial  2,280,000   24,527,852   3,114,323   23,693,529 
Frankfort (Lexington) Industrial  1,850,000   26,150,000   2,570,299   25,429,701 
Louisville Industrial  1,590,000   9,714,000   581,179   10,722,821 
Louisiana:                  
Covington (New Orleans) Industrial  2,720,000   15,690,000   1,139,872   17,270,128 
Maryland:                  
Beltsville (Washington, DC) Industrial  3,200,000   11,312,355   4,151,339   10,361,016 
Michigan:                  
Walker (Grand Rapids) Industrial  4,034,363   27,620,623   1,062,332   30,592,654 
Livonia (Detroit) Industrial  320,000   13,442,030   2,046,869   11,715,161 
Orion Industrial  4,649,971   18,240,153   4,488,942   18,401,182 
Romulus (Detroit) Industrial  531,000   4,201,671   2,043,189   2,689,482 
Minnesota:                  
Stewartville (Rochester) Industrial  900,000   4,320,000   553,846   4,666,154 
Mississippi:                  
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) Industrial  800,000   13,750,000   2,203,526   12,346,474 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool) Industrial  2,550,000   34,364,917   4,044,199   32,870,718 
Richland (Jackson) Industrial  211,000   1,689,691   982,066   918,625 
Ridgeland (Jackson) Industrial  218,000   1,667,254   1,313,173   572,081 
Missouri:                  
Kansas City (Bunzl) Industrial  1,000,000   8,980,250   885,643   9,094,607 
Liberty (Kansas City) Industrial  723,000   6,674,881   3,497,982   3,899,899 
O’Fallon (St. Louis) Industrial  264,000   3,981,913   2,361,768   1,884,145 
St. Joseph Industrial  800,000   12,563,648   5,452,138   7,911,510 
Nebraska:                  
Omaha Industrial  1,170,000   4,774,691   2,358,451   3,586,240 
New Jersey:                  
Carlstadt (New York, NY) Industrial  1,194,000   3,748,402   1,029,584   3,912,818 
Somerset Shopping Center  34,317   3,077,460   1,589,653   1,522,124 
New York:                  
Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Industrial  4,796,765   6,164,058   1,851,798   9,109,025 
Halfmoon (Albany) Industrial  1,190,000   4,335,600   722,600   4,803,000 
Hamburg (Buffalo) Industrial  1,700,000   33,150,000   1,700,000   33,150,000 
North Carolina:                  
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,305,000   28,739,797   2,314,361   30,730,436 
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,306,684   35,736,461   1,069,039   38,974,106 
Fayetteville Industrial  172,000   5,279,629   2,931,202   2,520,427 
Winston-Salem Industrial  980,000   6,266,326   2,617,877   4,628,449 
Ohio:                  
Bedford Heights (Cleveland) Industrial  990,000   5,929,836   1,893,515   5,026,321 
Cincinnati Industrial  800,000   5,950,000   470,406   6,279,594 
Kenton Industrial  854,780   17,026,827   454,776   17,426,831 
Lebanon (Cincinnati) Industrial  240,000   4,212,425   704,125   3,748,300 
Monroe (Cincinnati) Industrial  1,800,000   15,724,760   1,023,271   16,501,489 
Richfield (Cleveland) Industrial  2,676,848   13,770,330   3,083,114   13,364,064 

 

 112 

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Stow Industrial $1,429,715  $17,504,350  $448,829  $18,485,236 
Streetsboro (Cleveland) Industrial  1,760,000   17,840,000   2,973,333   16,626,667 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) Industrial  695,000   5,038,686   2,305,181   3,428,505 
Oklahoma:                  
Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,410,000   11,174,462   1,599,042   10,985,420 
Oklahoma City (Bunzl) Industrial  844,688   7,883,751   252,684   8,475,755 
Oklahoma City (Amazon) Industrial  1,618,240   28,260,702   603,861   29,275,081 
Tulsa Industrial  790,000   2,958,031   391,119   3,356,912 
Pennsylvania:                  
Altoona Industrial  1,200,000   7,822,966   986,269   8,036,697 
Imperial (Pittsburgh) Industrial  3,700,000   16,250,000   1,076,389   18,873,611 
Monaca (Pittsburgh) Industrial  401,716   7,508,950   2,957,471   4,953,195 
South Carolina:                  
Aiken (Augusta, GA) Industrial 1,362,458  19,677,937  630,703  20,409,692 
Charleston (FDX) Industrial  4,639,283   16,880,128   397,072   21,122,339 
Charleston (FDX Ground) Industrial  7,103,106   39,473,274   168,689   46,407,691 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) Industrial  1,746,822   15,327,214   2,654,658   14,419,378 
Hanahan (Charleston)(SAIC) Industrial  1,129,000   12,281,102   4,343,346   9,066,756 
Hanahan (Charleston)(FDX Ground) Industrial  930,000   6,684,653   2,071,138   5,543,515 
Tennessee:                  
Chattanooga Industrial  300,000   4,838,540   1,388,863   3,749,677 
Lebanon (Nashville) Industrial  2,230,000   11,985,126   2,151,164   12,063,962 
Memphis Industrial  1,234,987   13,380,000   2,916,162   11,698,825 
Shelby County Vacant Land  11,065   -0-   -0-   11,065 
Texas:                  
Carrollton (Dallas) Industrial  1,500,000   16,319,203   3,555,283   14,263,920 
Corpus Christi Industrial  -0-   4,808,330   797,350   4,010,980 
Edinburg Industrial  1,000,000   11,039,014   1,472,631   10,566,383 
El Paso Industrial  3,225,195   9,205,997   1,977,282   10,453,910 
Ft. Worth (Dallas) Industrial  8,200,000   27,100,832   2,200,495   33,100,337 
Houston Industrial  1,661,120   6,502,158   1,440,389   6,722,889 
Lindale (Tyler) Industrial  540,000   9,425,550   966,498   8,999,052 
Mesquite (Dallas) Industrial  6,247,658   43,632,835   1,398,488   48,482,005 
Spring (Houston) Industrial  1,890,000   17,404,396   2,077,166   17,217,230 
Waco Industrial  1,350,000   11,201,368   1,498,728   11,052,640 
Virginia:                  
Charlottesville Industrial  1,170,000   3,285,702   1,588,202   2,867,500 
Mechanicsville (Richmond) Industrial  1,160,000   6,632,395   3,007,443   4,784,952 
Richmond Industrial  446,000   4,322,309   1,545,670   3,222,639 
Roanoke (CHEP USA) Industrial  1,853,000   5,610,672   1,706,454   5,757,218 
Roanoke (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,740,000   8,460,000   1,147,885   9,052,115 
Washington:                  
Burlington (Seattle/Everett) Industrial  8,000,000   22,228,547   1,426,792   28,801,755 
Wisconsin:                  
Cudahy (Milwaukee) Industrial  980,000   8,786,361   3,296,930   6,469,431 
Green Bay Industrial  590,000   5,980,000   766,667   5,803,333 
Total as of September 30, 2018   $224,719,083  $1,494,859,336  $207,065,634  $1,512,512,785 

113

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Alabama:                  
Huntsville Industrial $748,115  $5,913,696  $1,092,730  $5,569,081 
Arizona:                  
Tolleson (Phoenix) Industrial  1,316,075   15,508,151   5,634,312   11,189,914 
Colorado:                  
Colorado Springs (1) Industrial  1,270,000   5,934,472   1,644,190   5,560,282 
Colorado Springs Industrial  2,150,000   26,350,000   900,855   27,599,145 
Denver Industrial  1,150,000   5,204,051   1,570,819   4,783,232 
Connecticut:                  
Newington (Hartford) Industrial  410,000   3,084,108   1,288,391   2,205,717 
Florida:                  
Cocoa Industrial  1,881,316   12,246,133   2,435,695   11,691,754 
Davenport (Orlando) Industrial  7,060,000   30,720,000   918,974   36,861,026 
Ft. Myers (Vacant) (1) Industrial  1,910,000   3,107,448   1,057,915   3,959,533 
Ft. Myers (FDX Ground) Industrial  2,400,000   19,223,000   353,846   21,269,154 
Homestead (Miami) Industrial  4,426,727   33,446,393   214,400   37,658,720 
Jacksonville (FDX) Industrial  1,165,000   5,164,784   2,450,615   3,879,169 
Jacksonville (FDX Ground) Industrial  6,000,000   24,732,090   1,688,236   29,043,854 
Lakeland Industrial  261,000   1,721,532   525,151   1,457,381 
Orlando Industrial  2,200,000   6,354,432   1,636,085   6,918,347 
Punta Gorda Industrial  -0-   4,133,510   945,236   3,188,274 
Tampa (FDX Ground) Industrial  5,000,000   14,696,227   4,544,868   15,151,359 
Tampa (FDX) Industrial  2,830,000   4,789,924   1,383,938   6,235,986 
Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) Industrial  1,867,000   3,810,982   1,043,048   4,634,934 
Georgia:                  
Augusta (FDX Ground) Industrial  614,406   4,748,899   1,385,556   3,977,749 
Augusta (FDX) Industrial  380,000   1,597,779   415,251   1,562,528 
Griffin (Atlanta) Industrial  760,000   14,108,857   4,128,872   10,739,985 
Illinois:                  
Burr Ridge (Chicago) Industrial  270,000   1,422,901   698,725   994,176 
Elgin (Chicago) Industrial  1,280,000   5,697,442   2,284,344   4,693,098 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  340,000   12,357,848   4,834,280   7,863,568 
Montgomery (Chicago) Industrial  2,000,000   9,298,367   2,522,213   8,776,154 
Rockford (Collins Aerospace Systems) Industrial  480,000   4,620,000   355,385   4,744,615 
Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Co.) Industrial  1,100,000   4,451,227   744,286   4,806,941 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  1,890,000   13,314,950   1,024,382   14,180,568 
Schaumburg (Chicago) Industrial  1,039,800   4,138,140   2,159,563   3,018,377 
Wheeling (Chicago) Industrial  5,112,120   13,425,532   4,079,587   14,458,065 
Indiana:                  
Greenwood (Indianapolis) Industrial  2,250,000   35,262,071   2,186,221   35,325,850 
Indianapolis Industrial  3,739,030   21,267,342   1,657,124   23,349,248 
Iowa:                  
Urbandale (Des Moines) Industrial  310,000   1,946,613   1,144,794   1,111,819 
Kansas:                  
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlisle Tire) Industrial  1,185,000   6,047,986   2,358,818   4,874,168 
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) Industrial  2,750,000   15,544,108   1,587,164   16,706,944 
Olathe (Kansas City) Industrial  2,350,000   29,387,000   879,098   30,857,902 
Topeka Industrial  -0-   3,679,843   802,124   2,877,719 
Kentucky:                  
Buckner (Louisville) Industrial  2,280,000   24,527,852   2,472,411   24,335,441 
Frankfort (Lexington) Industrial  1,850,000   26,150,000   1,899,786   26,100,214 
Louisville Industrial  1,590,000   9,714,000   332,103   10,971,897 
Louisiana:                  
Covington (New Orleans) Industrial  2,720,000   15,690,000   737,564   17,672,436 

114

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Maryland:                  
Beltsville (Washington, DC) Industrial $3,200,000  $11,312,355  $3,843,707  $10,668,648 
Michigan:                  
Walker (Grand Rapids) Industrial  4,034,363   27,620,623   354,111   31,300,875 
Livonia (Detroit) Industrial  320,000   13,442,030   1,698,607   12,063,423 
Orion Industrial  4,649,971   18,235,665   4,019,239   18,866,397 
Romulus (Detroit) Industrial  531,000   4,136,506   1,922,903   2,744,603 
Minnesota:                  
Stewartville (Rochester) Industrial  900,000   4,320,000   443,077   4,776,923 
Mississippi:                  
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) Industrial  800,000   13,750,000   1,850,962   12,699,038 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool) Industrial  2,550,000   34,364,917   3,159,783   33,755,134 
Richland (Jackson) Industrial  211,000   1,689,691   904,133   996,558 
Ridgeland (Jackson) Industrial  218,000   1,640,591   1,246,001   612,590 
Missouri:                  
Kansas City (Bunzl) Industrial  1,000,000   8,651,226   646,520   9,004,706 
Kansas City (Kellogg) (1) Industrial  660,000   4,140,474   1,147,694   3,652,780 
Liberty (Kansas City) Industrial  723,000   6,674,881   3,325,236   4,072,645 
O’Fallon (St. Louis) Industrial  264,000   3,981,913   2,228,921   2,016,992 
St. Joseph Industrial  800,000   12,489,270   5,101,907   8,187,363 
Nebraska:                  
Omaha Industrial  1,170,000   4,774,691   2,233,901   3,710,790 
New Jersey:                  
Carlstadt (New York, NY) Industrial  1,194,000   3,709,589   939,584   3,964,005 
Somerset Shopping Center  34,317   3,038,573   1,494,297   1,578,593 
New York:                  
Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Industrial  4,796,765   6,164,058   1,692,362   9,268,461 
Halfmoon (Albany) Industrial  1,190,000   4,335,600   611,431   4,914,169 
Hamburg (Buffalo) Industrial  1,700,000   33,150,000   850,000   34,000,000 
Orangeburg (New York) (1) Industrial  694,720   3,200,955   2,436,637   1,459,038 
North Carolina:                  
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,305,000   28,739,797   1,471,238   31,573,559 
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,306,684   35,736,461   152,720   39,890,425 
Fayetteville Industrial  172,000   5,279,629   2,698,223   2,753,406 
Winston-Salem Industrial  980,000   6,258,613   2,401,589   4,837,024 
Ohio:                  
Bedford Heights (Cleveland) Industrial  990,000   5,929,836   1,707,394   5,212,442 
Cincinnati Industrial  800,000   5,950,000   317,842   6,432,158 
Kenton Industrial  854,780   17,026,827   18,188   17,863,419 
Lebanon (Cincinnati) Industrial  240,000   4,212,425   594,620   3,857,805 
Monroe (Cincinnati) Industrial  1,800,000   11,137,000   737,707   12,199,293 
Richfield (Cleveland) Industrial  2,676,848   13,758,630   2,728,544   13,706,934 
Stow Industrial  1,429,715   17,504,350   -0-   18,934,065 
Streetsboro (Cleveland) Industrial  1,760,000   17,840,000   2,515,897   17,084,103 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) Industrial  695,000   5,038,686   2,125,801   3,607,885 
Oklahoma:                  
Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,410,000   11,174,462   1,306,735   11,277,727 
Oklahoma City (Bunzl) Industrial  844,688   7,883,751   50,537   8,677,902 
Tulsa Industrial  790,000   2,958,031   309,194   3,438,837 
Pennsylvania:                  
Altoona Industrial  1,200,000   7,808,650   784,660   8,223,990 
Imperial (Pittsburgh) Industrial  3,700,000   16,250,000   659,722   19,290,278 
Monaca (Pittsburgh) Industrial  401,716   7,484,125   2,642,181   5,243,660 

115

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
South Carolina:                  
Aiken (Augusta, GA) Industrial $1,362,458  $19,677,937  $126,141  $20,914,254 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) Industrial  1,670,000   13,743,307   2,302,265   13,111,042 
Hanahan (Charleston)(SAIC) Industrial  1,129,000   12,245,441   3,961,769   9,412,672 
Hanahan (Charleston)(FDX Ground) Industrial  930,000   6,684,653   1,897,664   5,716,989 
Tennessee:                  
Chattanooga Industrial  300,000   4,716,518   1,262,219   3,754,299 
Lebanon (Nashville) Industrial  2,230,000   11,985,126   1,843,853   12,371,273 
Memphis Industrial  1,240,887   13,381,050   2,573,085   12,048,852 
Shelby County Vacant Land  11,065   -0-   -0-   11,065 
Texas:                  
Carrollton (Dallas) Industrial  1,500,000   16,319,203   3,130,523   14,688,680 
Corpus Christi Industrial  -0-   4,771,913   672,040   4,099,873 
Edinburg Industrial  1,000,000   11,039,014   1,188,983   10,850,031 
El Paso Industrial  3,225,195   9,205,997   1,709,714   10,721,478 
Ft. Worth (Dallas) Industrial  8,200,000   27,100,832   1,505,602   33,795,230 
Houston Industrial  1,661,120   6,487,338   1,248,713   6,899,745 
Lindale (Tyler) Industrial  540,000   9,396,500   722,416   9,214,084 
Mesquite (Dallas) Industrial  6,247,658   43,632,835   279,698   49,600,795 
Spring (Houston) Industrial  1,890,000   17,393,798   1,629,658   17,654,140 
Waco Industrial  1,350,000   11,201,368   1,210,344   11,341,024 
Virginia:                  
Charlottesville Industrial  1,170,000   3,186,988   1,489,266   2,867,722 
Mechanicsville (Richmond) Industrial  1,160,000   6,625,011   2,824,533   4,960,478 
Richmond Industrial  446,000   4,322,309   1,409,820   3,358,489 
Roanoke (CHEP USA) Industrial  1,853,000   5,552,447   1,516,288   5,889,159 
Roanoke (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,740,000   8,460,000   930,962   9,269,038 
Washington:                  
Burlington (Seattle/Everett) Industrial  8,000,000   22,228,547   855,500   29,373,047 
Wisconsin:                  
Cudahy (Milwaukee) Industrial  980,000   8,402,361   3,075,370   6,306,991 
Green Bay Industrial  590,000   5,980,000   613,333   5,956,667 
Total as of September 30, 2017   $191,759,539  $1,261,075,064  $177,372,519  $1,275,462,084 

(1)Classified as Real Estate Held for Sale.

116

 

NOTE 3 – ACQUISITIONS, EXPANSIONS AND DISPOSITIONDISPOSITIONS

 

Fiscal 20162018 Acquisitions accounted for as asset acquisitions

 

Acquisitions

On November 13, 2015, the Company2, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 330,717121,683 square foot industrial building, situated on 16.2 acres, located in Concord, NC,Charleston, SC. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX), for 15 years through August 2032. The purchase price was $21,872,170. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $14,200,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.23%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,315,000.

On November 30, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 300,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 123.0 acres, located in Oklahoma City, OK. The building is 100% net-leased to Amazon.com Services, Inc. for 10 years through October 2027. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon.com, Inc. The purchase price was $30,250,000. We obtained a 10 year mortgage loan, amortizing over 18 years, of $19,600,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.64%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,884,000.

On January 22, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 831,764 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.4 acres, located in Savannah, GA. The building is 100% net-leased to Shaw Industries, Inc. for 10 years through September 2027. The purchase price was $57,483,636. We obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $33,300,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.53%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $3,551,000.

On April 6, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 399,440 square foot industrial building, situated on 27.5 acres, located in Daytona Beach, FL. The building is 100% net-leased to B. Braun Medical Inc. for 10 years through April 2028. The purchase price was $30,750,540. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.25%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,130,000.

On June 28, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 362,942 square foot industrial building, situated on 31.3 acres, located in Mobile, AL. The building is 100% net-leased to Amazon.com Services, Inc. for 11 years through November 2028. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon.com, Inc. The purchase price was $33,688,276. We obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.14%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,020,000.

On August 15, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 265,318 square foot industrial building, situated on 48.9 acres, located in Charleston, SC. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. The purchase price was $47,174,296. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $29,860,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.82%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,713,000.

On September 6, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 373,750 square foot industrial building, situated on 92.6 acres, located in Braselton, GA which is in the CharlotteAtlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for ten15 years through July 2025.February 2033. The purchase price was $31,975,897. The Company$61,113,264. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $20,780,000$39,700,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.87%4.02%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,078,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

On December 2, 2015, the Company purchased a newly constructed 175,315 square foot industrial building located in Covington, LA, which is in the New Orleans MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for ten years through June 2025. The purchase price was $18,410,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $12,890,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.08%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,258,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

On March 8, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 125,860 square foot industrial building located in Imperial, PA, which is in the Pittsburgh MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to General Electric Company (GE) for ten years through December 2025. The purchase price was $20,032,864. The Company obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $13,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.63%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,311,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $82,864 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On April 8, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 210,445 square foot industrial building located in Burlington, WA, which is in the Seattle/Everett MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen years through August 2030. The purchase price was $30,662,080. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $20,221,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.67%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,962,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $451,400 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On June 9, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 225,362 square foot industrial building located in Colorado Springs, CO. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for ten years through January 2026. The purchase price was $28,845,500. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $18,730,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.90%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,832,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $345,500 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On June 30, 2016, the Company purchased a newly constructed 137,500 square foot industrial building located in Louisville, KY. The building is 100% net-leased to Challenger Lifts, Inc., a subsidiary of Snap-on Incorporated (“Snap-on”), for ten years through June 2026. The lease is guaranteed by Snap-on. The purchase price was $11,304,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $7,350,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.74%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $835,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.$3,801,000.

 

 113117 

 

On August 19, 2016,We evaluated the Companyproperty acquisitions which took place during the twelve months ended September 30, 2018, to determine whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business, pursuant to ASU 2017-01. Acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. Accordingly, we accounted for all seven properties purchased during fiscal 2018 as asset acquisitions and allocated the total cash consideration, including transaction costs of approximately $1,071,000, to the individual assets acquired on a newly constructed 310,922 square foot industrial building locatedrelative fair value basis. There were no liabilities assumed in Davenport, FL, which is in the Orlando MSA.these acquisitions. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen years through April 2031. Thefinancial information set forth below summarizes our purchase price was $37,780,000. The Company obtained a 15allocation for these seven properties acquired during the fiscal year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $26,400,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.89%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,604,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.2018 that were accounted for as asset acquisitions:

 

Land $37,330,383 
Building  239,890,739 
In-Place Leases  6,181,731 

On August 26, 2016,

The following table summarizes the Company purchased a newly constructed 313,763 square foot industrial building locatedoperating results included in Olathe, KS, which is inour consolidated statements of income for the Kansas City MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 for fifteen years through May 2031. The purchase price was $31,737,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $22,215,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.96%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term ofseven properties acquired during the lease averages approximately $2,196,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.twelve months ended September 30, 2018:

 

  Year Ended
9/30/2018
 
    
Rental Revenues $7,429,989 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  2,131,150 

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s ultimate parent, FedEx Corporation, General Electric CompanyFDX, Amazon.com, Inc. and Challenger Lifts,Shaw Industries, Inc.’s ultimate parent, Snap-on IncorporatedBerkshire Hathaway, Inc. are publicly-owned companies and financial information related to these entities is available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.govwww.sec.gov.. The references in this report to the SEC’s website are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information on those websites.thewww.sec.gov website.

 

Fiscal 2018 Expansions

On July 29, 2016, a 246,434 square foot expansion of a building leased to Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation (“Milwaukee Tool”) located in Olive Branch, MS, which is located in the Memphis, TN MSA, was completed for a cost of approximately $9,785,000. This resulted in a new 12 year lease which extended the original lease expiration date from April 2023 through July 2028 and increased the building size from 615,455 to 861,889 square feet. In addition, the expansion resulted in an initial increase in annual rent effective on the date of completion of approximately $847,000 from approximately $1,943,000, or $3.16 per square foot, to approximately $2,790,000, or $3.24 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will increase each year by 1.5% resulting in an annualized rent over the new twelve year period of approximately $3,020,000, or $3.50 per square foot. In September 2016, in connection with the expansion, the Company refinanced its prior 3.76% interest rate mortgage with its existing lender of this property. At the time of the refinancing, the prior amortizing loan was approximately $13,158,000 and was set to mature in January 2023. The new loan is a 12 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $25,000,000 and will mature in October 2028. The interest rate of the new loan remained the same as the prior loan at a fixed interest rate of 3.76%.

 

On AugustNovember 1, 2016,2017, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Tampa, FLIndianapolis, IN was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,303,000,$1,683,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from JuneApril 2024 through July 2026.to October 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $131,000$184,000 from approximately $1,493,000,$1,533,000, or $8.74$4.67 per square foot, to approximately $1,624,000,$1,715,000, or $9.51$5.23 per square foot.

 

On August 1, 2016,September 27, 2018, a 14,941 square footparking lot expansion offor a buildingproperty leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Huntsville, ALFt. Mill, SC was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,925,000,$1,834,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from October 2023 to August 2022 through July 2026.2028. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $193,000$183,000 from approximately $412,000,$1,415,000, or $5.59$8.00 per square foot, to approximately $605,000$1,598,000, or $6.82$9.03 per square foot.

Fiscal 2018 Dispositions

Two leases were set to expire during fiscal 2018 with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) for our 65,067 square foot facility located in Kansas City, MO through July 31, 2018 and our 50,400 square foot facility located in Orangeburg, NY through February 28, 2018. Kellogg informed us that they would not be renewing these leases. On December 18, 2017, we sold our property located in Kansas City, MO for $4,900,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $4,602,000 and, on December 22, 2017, we sold our property located in Orangeburg, NY for $6,170,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,898,000. In conjunction with the sale of these two properties, we simultaneously entered into a lease termination agreement for each property whereby we received a termination fee from Kellogg totaling approximately $210,000 which represents a weighted average of 80% of the then remaining rent due under each respective lease.

 

 114118 

 

Fiscal 2015On June 1, 2018, we sold a 68,370 square foot building located in Colorado Springs, CO for $5,800,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,465,000. Prior to the sale of this property, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through September 2018. The tenant informed us that they would not be renewing this lease because they have moved their operations from our former 68,370 square foot facility to our newly constructed 225,362 square foot facility, which is also located in Colorado Springs, CO. On June 9, 2016, we purchased this newly constructed 225,362 square foot industrial building, which is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through January 2026.

 

AcquisitionsOn June 5, 2018, we sold an 87,500 square foot vacant building located in Ft. Myers, FL for $6,400,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $6,119,000. Prior to this property becoming vacant, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through June 2017. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. vacated this property because they moved their operations to our newly constructed 213,672 square foot facility, which is also located in Ft. Myers, FL. We purchased this newly constructed facility on December 30, 2016 and it is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through August 2027.

These four properties sold during fiscal 2018, resulted in a U.S. GAAP net realized gain of approximately $7,485,000, representing a 51% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a net realized gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis of approximately $1,160,000, representing a 6% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis.

 

Fiscal 2017 Acquisitions accounted for as business combinations

On October 3, 2014, the Company17, 2016, we purchased a newly constructed 163,378338,584 square foot industrial building located in Lindale, TX,Hamburg, NY, which is in the TylerBuffalo MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for ten15 years through June 2024.March 2031. The purchase price was $10,271,355. The Company$35,100,000. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $7,000,000$23,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.57%4.03%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease isaverages approximately $725,000.$2,309,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Companywe completed itsour evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of itsour evaluation, the Companywe allocated $341,355$250,000 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

 

On October 10, 2014, the CompanyDecember 30, 2016, we purchased a newly constructed 198,773213,672 square foot industrial building located in Sauget, IL,Ft. Myers, FL. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through September 2026. The purchase price was $21,001,538. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $14,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.97%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,365,000. In connection with the acquisition, we completed our evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of our evaluation, we allocated $201,538 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place. On September 1, 2017, a parking lot expansion for this property was completed for a cost of approximately $862,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2026 to August 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $53,000 from approximately $1,365,000 to approximately $1,418,000.

Fiscal 2017 Acquisitions accounted for as asset acquisitions

On April 5, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 343,483 square foot industrial building located in Walker, MI, which is in the St. Louis, MOGrand Rapids MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen15 years through May 2029.January 2032. The purchase price was $15,231,000. The Company$32,120,000. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $10,660,000$20,875,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.40%3.86%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease isaverages approximately $1,036,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $31,000 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.$2,102,000.

 

On October 14, 2014, the CompanyJune 23, 2017, we purchased a 38,833newly constructed 351,874 square foot industrial building located in Rockford, IL, which was constructed in 2012. The building is 100% net-leased to B/E Aerospace, Inc. for fifteen years through June 2027. The property was acquired, all-cash, for a purchase price of $5,200,000. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease is approximately $359,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $100,000 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On November 25, 2014, the Company purchased a newly constructed 158,417 square foot industrial building located in Kansas City, MO. The building is 100% net-leased to Bunzl Distribution Midcentral, Inc. for seven years through September 2021. The purchase price was $9,635,770. The Company obtained a 7 year mortgage, of $7,226,828, amortizing over 25 years at a fixed interest rate of 5.18%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease is approximately $736,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $35,770 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On December 12, 2014, the Company purchased a newly constructed 599,840 square foot industrial building located in Frankfort, KY, which is in the Lexington MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to Jim Beam Brands Company for ten years through January 2025. The purchase price was $28,000,000. The Company obtained a 10 year mortgage, of $19,600,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.84% with an amortization schedule as follows: amortizing over 18 years during the first 30 months, amortizing over 14 years during the next 30 months, amortizing over 11 years during the next 30 months and amortizing over 8 years during the final 30 months. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease is approximately $1,989,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

On February 26, 2015, the Company purchased a newly constructed 297,579 square foot industrial building located in Jacksonville, FL. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen years through December 2029. The purchase price was $30,645,954. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $20,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.93%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease is approximately $1,992,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

115

On March 13, 2015, the Company purchased a newly constructed 232,200 square foot industrial building located in Monroe, OH, which is in the Cincinnati MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to UGN, Inc. for fifteen years through February 2030. The purchase price was $13,416,000. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $8,700,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.77%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease is approximately $1,045,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company allocated $479,000 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.

On May 7, 2015, the Company purchased a newly constructed 671,354 square foot industrial building located in Greenwood, IN, which is in the Indianapolis MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to ULTA, Inc. for ten years through July 2025. The purchase price was $37,484,574. The Company obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage of $24,286,230 at a fixed interest rate of 3.91%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease is approximately $2,644,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.

On August 14, 2015, the Company purchased a newly constructed 304,608 square foot industrial building located in Fort Worth,Mesquite, TX, in the Fort Worth Alliance Airport, which is in the Dallas MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen15 years through April 2030.March 2032. The purchase price was $35,300,832. The Company$50,621,072. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $24,700,000$32,900,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.56%3.60%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease isaverages approximately $2,362,000. In connection with the acquisition, the Company completed its evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of its evaluation, the Company has not allocated any amount to an Intangible Asset.$3,194,000.

119

 

On September 25, 2015, the CompanyJune 27, 2017, we purchased a 63,840newly constructed 315,560 square foot industrial building located in Cincinnati, OH,Aiken, SC, which was constructedis in 2014.the Augusta, GA MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to The American Bottling CompanyAutoneum North America, Inc. for fifteen15 years through August 2029.April 2032. The lease is guaranteed by the parent company, Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. The property was acquired, all-cash, for a purchase price was $21,933,000. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $6,800,000.$15,350,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.20%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,700,000.

On June 28, 2017, we purchased a newly-constructed 237,756 square foot industrial building located in Homestead, FL, which is approximately $480,000. In connection within the acquisition,Miami MSA. The building is 100% net leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through March 2032. The purchase price was $38,347,933. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $24,800,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.60%. Annual rental revenue over the Company completed its evaluationremaining term of the acquired lease. Aslease averages approximately $2,282,000.

On June 29, 2017, we purchased a resultnewly constructed 110,361 square foot industrial building located in Oklahoma City, OK. The building is 100% net-leased to Bunzl Distribution Oklahoma, Inc. for seven years through August 2024. The purchase price was $9,000,000. We obtained a 12 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of its evaluation,$6,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.125%. Annual rental revenue over the Company allocated $50,000 to an Intangible Asset associated withremaining term of the lease in-place.averages approximately $721,000.

 

On August 3, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 354,482 square foot industrial building located in Concord, NC which is in the Charlotte MSA. The building is 100% net leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through May 2032. The purchase price was $40,598,446. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $26,184,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.80%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,537,000.

On September 19, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 298,472 square foot industrial building located in Kenton, OH. The building is 100% net leased to International Paper Company for 10 years through August 2027. The purchase price was $18,299,032. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $12,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.45%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,243,000.

On September 29, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 219,765 square foot industrial building located in Stow, OH. The building is 100% net leased to Mickey Thompson Performance Tires and Wheels for 10 years through August 2027. The purchase price was $19,500,000. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $12,700,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.17%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,500,000.

We evaluated the property acquisitions which took place subsequent to March 31, 2017, under the new framework for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business, pursuant to ASU 2017-01, which we early-adopted effective April 1, 2017.

Acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. Accordingly, we accounted for the properties purchased in Walker (Grand Rapids), MI; Mesquite (Dallas), TX; Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC; Homestead (Miami), FL; Oklahoma City, OK; Concord (Charlotte), NC; Kenton, OH and Stow, OH as asset acquisitions and allocated the total cash consideration, including transaction costs of approximately $431,000, to the individual assets acquired on a relative fair value basis. There were no liabilities assumed in these acquisitions. The financial information set forth below summarizes our purchase price allocation for these eight properties acquired during the year ended September 30, 2017 that are accounted for as asset acquisitions:

Land $23,507,073 
Building  202,529,177 
In-Place Leases  4,814,192 

120

The following table summarizes the operating results included in our consolidated statements of income for the years ended September 30, 2017 for the properties acquired during the year ended September 30, 2017:

  Year Ended
9/30/2017
 
Rental Revenues $7,086,464 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  2,156,885 

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s ultimate parent, FedEx Corporation, B/E Aerospace, Inc., ULTA Inc.’sFDX, International Paper Company and Mickey Thompson Performance Tires and Wheels ultimate parent, Ulta Salon, CosmeticsCooper Tire & Fragrance, Inc. and The American Bottling Company’s ultimate parent, Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.Rubber Company are publicly-owned companies and financial information related to these entities is available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. Jim Beam Brands Company’sAutoneum North America, Inc.’s ultimate parent, Suntory Beverage & Food LimitedAutoneum Holding AG is a publicly-owned company and financial information related to this entity is available at the Tokyo StockSwiss Exchange’s website,www.jpx.co.jp/english https://www.six-swiss-exchange.com/index.html and Bunzl Distribution Midcentral,Oklahoma, Inc.’s ultimate parent, Bunzl plc is a publicly-owned company and financial information related to this entity is available at the U.K. government’s website,https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/companies-house.companies-house. The references in this report to the SEC’s website, the Tokyo StockSwiss Exchange’s website and the U.K. government’s website are not intended to and do not include or incorporate by reference into this report the information on those websites.

2017 Expansions

 

Expansions

In September 2013,On October 1, 2016, a 51,76550,625 square foot expansion of athe building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in El Paso,Edinburg, TX was completed for a cost of approximately $3,800,000 resulting in an increase in annual rent effective October 1, 2013 from $667,584, or $7.27 per square foot, to $1,045,610, or $7.25 per square foot. In addition, the expansion resulted in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2015 through September 2023. During June 2015, a parking lot expansion for the same property was completed for a cost of approximately $2,472,000 resulting in an increase in annual rent effective July 1, 2015 to $1,345,289, or $9.33 per square foot.

116

During December 2014, a 62,260 square foot expansion of a building leased to NF&M International, Inc. located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA was completed for a cost of approximately $4,503,000,$4,762,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease, which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2018 through December 2024.2021 to September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an initial increase in annual rent effective January 1, 2015 from $381,805,the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $3.39$5.26 per square foot, to $820,000,approximately $1,097,000, or $4.69 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will increase in year five of the lease effective January 1, 2020 to $841,600, or $4.81 per square foot, resulting in an annualized rent over the new ten year period of $830,800, or $4.75$6.68 per square foot.

 

During June 2015,As discussed above, on September 1, 2017, a 38,428 square footparking lot expansion offor a buildingproperty leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Oklahoma City, OKFt. Myers, FL was completed for a cost of approximately $3,332,000,$862,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from March 2022 through June 2025.September 2026 to August 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective August 1, 2015 from $712,532,the date of completion of approximately $53,000 from approximately $1,365,000, or $5.94$6.39 per square foot to $1,048,250,approximately $1,418,000, or $6.62$6.64 per square foot.

 

2017 Disposition

During August 2015, a 48,116 square foot expansion of a building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Waco, TX was completed for a cost of approximately $4,125,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from May 2022 through August 2025. In addition, the expansion resultedyear, in an increase in annual rent effective August 15, 2015 from $659,324, or $6.43 per square foot, to $1,078,383, or $7.16 per square foot.

Disposition

On September 18, 2015, the CompanyOctober 2016, we sold its 160,000 square foot industrial building located in Monroe, NC for $9,000,000, with net sale proceeds to the Company of approximately $8,847,000. The property was sold to Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company, the tenant that was leasing the property from the Company through July 31, 2017 at an annual rental rate of approximately $571,000. The Company purchased this property in 2001 and it had a historic cost basis of approximately $5,557,000 and a net book value (net of accumulated depreciation) of approximately $3,825,000. The sale resulted in a realized gain of approximately $5,021,000, representing a 131% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a realized gain on a historic cost of approximately $3,290,000, representing a 59% gain over the Company’s historic cost basis.

Subsequent to the yearend, on October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building, (which increased our occupancy rate from 99.6% to 100.0%), consisting of a 59,425 square foot industrial building situated on 4.78 acres located in White Bear Lake, MN for net proceeds of approximately $4,272,000,$4,126,000, which is the Company’s approximate U.S. GAAP net bookwas approximately our carrying value.

Consolidated Statements of Income for the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 of properties sold during the periods presented

 

Since the sale of thesethe four properties dosold during fiscal 2018 (as discussed previously) and the one property sold during fiscal 2017, does not represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the Company’sour operations and financial results, the operations generated from these five properties are not included in Discontinued Operations.

117

The following table summarizes the operations of the Company’s 160,000 square foot industrial building located in Monroe, NCthese five properties, prior to its sale on September 18, 2015 and the 59,425 square foot industrial building located in White Bear Lake, MN prior to its sale on October 27, 2016 whichtheir sales, that are included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income for the three fiscal yearyears ended September 30:30, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

 

  2016  2015  2014 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $-0-  $571,250  $96,664 
Lease Termination Income  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Real Estate Taxes  (115,090)  (192,121)  (204,729)
Operating Expenses  (42,869)  (133,776)  (192,006)
Depreciation & Amortization  (97,074)  (336,939)  (235,501)
Interest Expense  -0-   (71,287)  (65,876)
Income (Loss) from Operations  (255,033)  (162,873)  (601,448)
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  -0-   5,021,242   -0- 
Net Income (Loss) $(255,033) $4,858,369  $(601,448)
121

  2018  2017  2016 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $928,808  $2,051,835  $2,138,713 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0- 
Real Estate Taxes  (211,928)  (351,645)  (341,174)
Operating Expenses  (109,735)  (169,605)  (104,363)
Depreciation & Amortization  (79,137)  (513,879)  (517,554)
Interest Expense  (38,272)  (143,510)  (221,595)
Income from Operations  699,997   873,196   954,027 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Real Estate Investment  7,485,266   (95,336)  -0- 
Net Income $8,185,263  $777,860  $954,027 

 

Pro forma information (unaudited)

 

The following unaudited pro forma condensed financial information has been prepared utilizing theour historical financial statements of the Company and the effect of additional revenue and expenses generated from the properties acquired and expanded subsequent to theour fiscal yearend (see Note 17), and from the properties acquired and expanded during fiscal 2016years 2018 and 20152017, assuming that these acquisitions and these completed expansions had occurred as of October 1, 2014,2016, after giving effect to certain adjustments includingincluding: (a) Rental Revenue adjustments resulting from the straight-lining of scheduled rent increases, (b) Interest Expense resulting from the assumed increase in Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable and Loans Payable related to the new acquisitions, and (c) Depreciation Expense related to the new acquisitions. As further described in Note 13, the net proceeds raised from the issuance of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock less the redemptions of our 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock redeemed on October 14, 2016 and our 7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock redeemed on June 7, 2017 were used to help fund property acquisitions and, therefore, the pro forma preferred dividend expense has been adjusted to account for its effect on Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders as if all the preferred stock issuances and redemptions had occurred on October 1, 2016. In addition, Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders excludes the operating expenses incurred during fiscal 20152018 and 20162017 for the one vacant property, located in White Bear Lake, MN,five properties that waswere sold during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, on October 27, 2016. Additionally, Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders excludes the income generated from the one property sold in fiscal 2015 as well as the Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment recognized from this sale during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015.periods presented. Furthermore, the proceeds raised from the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the DRIP) were used to fund property acquisitions and expansions and therefore, the weighted average shares outstanding used in calculating the Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders has been adjusted to account for the increase in shares raised through the DRIP, as if all the shares raised had occurred on October 1, 2014.2016. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial information is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved had the acquisitions and expansions reflected herein been consummated on the dates indicated or that will be achieved in the future.

 

  Fiscal Year
2016
  Fiscal Year
2015
 
Rental Revenues $93,397,700  $91,599,000 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  24,074,000   20,181,500 
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders $0.35  $0.29 

  Fiscal Year 2018  Fiscal Year 2017 
Rental Revenues $130,401,800  $130,644,200 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  31,382,200   26,411,000 
Basic Net Income per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders $0.39  $0.32 
Diluted Net Income per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders $0.38  $0.32 

 

 118122 

 

NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Net intangible assets consist of the estimated value of the acquired in-place leases in-placeand the acquired above market rent leases at acquisition for the following properties and are amortized over the remaining term of the lease:

 

  September 30, 2016  September 30, 2015 
Richfield, OH (Cleveland) $11,622  $51,472 
Colorado Springs, CO  -0-   3,729 
Griffin, GA (Atlanta)  19,815   84,665 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP)  -0-   32,217 
Wheeling, IL (Chicago)  -0-   125,060 
Orion, MI  19,994   72,976 
Topeka, KS  170,700   204,243 
Carrollton, TX (Dallas)  15,697   22,260 
Ft. Mill, SC (Charlotte, NC)  270,656   358,121 
Lebanon, TN (Nashville)  161,385   181,988 
Rockford, IL  144,817   164,284 
Edinburg, TX  279,120   335,162 
Corpus Christi, TX  112,794   135,735 
Halfmoon, NY (Albany)  255,620   303,901 
Lebanon, OH (Cincinnati)  240,939   334,215 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN)(Anda Distribution)  1,078,458   1,270,266 
Livonia, MI (Detroit)  376,306   444,730 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  31,271   35,847 
Buckner, KY (Louisville)  373,690   395,565 
Edwardsville, KS (Kansas City)(International Paper)  515,819   590,395 
Lindale, TX (Tyler)  271,334   306,344 
Sauget, IL (St. Louis, MO)  26,773   28,886 
Rockford, IL (B/E Aerospace)  84,106   92,053 
Kansas City, KS (Bunzl)  25,546   30,658 
Monroe, OH (Cincinnati)  428,411   460,362 
Cincinnati, OH  46,407   50,000 
Pittsburgh, PA  78,615   -0- 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  436,518   -0- 
Colorado Springs, CO  339,740   -0- 
Total Intangible Assets, net $5,816,153  $6,115,134 
  September 30, 2018  

September 30, 2017

 
Topeka, KS $102,867  $137,156 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  2,283   9,134 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  91,595   183,191 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  119,926   140,783 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  105,293   125,349 
Edinburg, TX  166,122   223,078 
Corpus Christi, TX  66,912   89,853 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  157,578   207,339 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  54,402   147,663 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals)  703,205   886,650 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  239,464   307,882 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  21,984   26,695 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  329,941   351,816 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  366,666   441,243 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  201,312   236,323 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  22,545   24,659 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  68,348   76,159 
Kansas City, MO  15,325   20,434 
Monroe, OH (Cincinnati)  364,530   396,460 
Cincinnati, OH  39,246   42,814 
Imperial, PA (Pittsburgh)  61,617   70,116 
Burlington, WA (Seattle/Everett)  375,265   406,756 
Colorado Springs, CO  278,699   316,703 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  215,517   232,759 
Ft. Myers, FL  184,272   194,209 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  448,835   482,498 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  854,091   916,969 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  737,832   792,486 
Homestead (Miami), FL  513,201   551,216 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  240,468   281,110 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  581,352   623,890 
Kenton, OH  438,035   487,160 
Stow, OH  521,166   579,612 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  377,988   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  669,693   -0- 
Savannah, GA  1,402,816   -0- 
Daytona Beach, FL  765,687   -0- 
Mobile, AL  1,016,789   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  667,358   -0- 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  999,531   -0- 
Total Intangible Assets, net of Accumulated Amortization $14,589,756  $10,010,165 

 

Amortization expense related to thesethe intangible assets attributable to acquired in-place leases was $1,076,776, $1,310,904$1,510,660, $969,751 and $1,305,336$1,076,776 for the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015respectively. We estimate that the aggregate amortization expense for these existing intangible assets will be approximately $1,737,000, $1,589,000, $1,582,000, $1,431,000, and 2014,$1,263,000 for each of the fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively. The Company estimatesamount that is being amortized into rental revenue related to the intangible assets attributable to acquired above market leases was $102,708 for the year ended September 30, 2018 and $101,968 for each of the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We estimate that the aggregate amortization expenseamount that will be amortized into rental revenue for existing intangible assets will be approximately $960,000, $909,000, $866,000, $730,000 and $718,000$103,000 for each of the fiscal years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 respectively.and will be approximately $34,000 for the fiscal year 2022.

 

 119123 

 

NOTE 5 – SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

 

As of September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we had approximately 16,010,00021,174,000 square feet of property, of which approximately 7,584,00010,083,000 square feet, or 47%48%, consisting of fifty-three60 separate stand-alone leases, were leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX) and its subsidiaries, (6%(7% to FDX and 41% to FDX subsidiaries). These properties are located in twenty-four24 different states. As of September 30, 2016,2018, the 60 separate stand-alone leases that are leased to FDX and FDX subsidiaries had a weighted average lease maturity of 9.4 years. As of September 30, 2018, the only tenants that leased 5% or more of the Company’sour total square footage were FDX and its subsidiaries and Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, which leased approximately 862,000 square feet, comprising approximately 5% of the Company’s rental space.subsidiaries. The tenants that leased more than 5% of total rentable square footage as of September 30, 2016, 2015,2018, 2017, and 20142016 were as follows:

 

 2016 2015 2014  2018 2017 2016 
FDX and Subsidiaries  47%  43%  44%  48%  50%  47%
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation (lease commenced fiscal 2013, expanded fiscal 2016)  5%  N/A   5%  <5%   5%  5%
ULTA, Inc. (lease commenced fiscal 2015)  N/A   5%  N/A 
TreeHouse Private Brands, Inc. (lease commenced fiscal 2014)  N/A   N/A   5%

 

During fiscal 2016,2018, the only tenant that accounted for 5% or more of our rental and reimbursement revenue was FDX (including its subsidiaries). Our rental and reimbursement revenue from FDX and its subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively, totaled approximately $80,726,000, $68,151,000 and $52,793,000, $41,954,000 and $35,007,000, or 56%58% (7% from FDX and 49%51% from FDX subsidiaries), 54% (8%59% (7% from FDX and 46%52% from FDX subsidiaries) and 54% (10%55% (9% from FDX and 44%46% from FDX subsidiaries), of total rent and reimbursement revenues. No other tenant accounted for 5% or more of the Company’sour total Rental and Reimbursement revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014.2016.

 

In addition to real estate property holdings, the Companywe held $73,604,894$154,920,545 in marketable REIT securities at September 30, 2016,2018, representing 5.3%8.0% of the Company’sour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). These liquid real estate holdings are not included in calculating the tenant concentration ratios above and therefore further enhance the Company’sincrease our diversification. As a result, theThe securities portfolio provides the Companyus with additional diversification, liquidity, diversification,and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available.

 

NOTE 6 – SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

 

The Company’sOur securities available for sale consist primarily consist of marketable common and preferred stock securities of other REITs. The CompanyWe generally limits itslimit our investment in marketable securities to be no more than approximately 10% of itsour undepreciated assets (which is the Company’sour total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). The Company doesWe do not own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of any of these issuers, nor does itdo we have a controlling financial interest. As of September 30, 2018, we held $154,920,545 in marketable REIT securities, representing 8.0% of our undepreciated assets.

 

The CompanyWe normally holdshold REIT securities long termlong-term and hashave the ability and intent to hold these securities to recovery. The Company hadWe have total net unrealized gainslosses on itsour securities portfolio of $12,942,267$24,744,579 as of September 30, 2016.2018.

 

The Company did not have anyWe held eight securities that we determined were temporarily impaired investments as of September 30, 2016.2018. We consider many factors in determining whether a security is other than temporarily impaired, including the nature of the security and the cause, severity and duration of the impairment. The following is a summary of temporarily impaired securities at September 30, 2018:

124

  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer 
     Unrealized     Unrealized 
Description of Securities Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
             
Preferred stock $3,194,000  $(1,613,782) $-0-  $-0- 
Common stock  93,367,200   (30,622,150)  -0-   -0- 
Total $96,561,200  $(32,235,932) $-0-  $-0- 

 

The Company did not have anyfollowing is a summary of the range of losses:

Number of

Individual

Securities

 

 

Fair

Value

  

 

Unrealized

Losses

  % Loss 
          
2 $21,980,000  $(351,051)  0-5%
2  31,996,000   (3,562,067)  6-10%
1  5,593,000   (825,791)  13%
2  21,032,200   (9,931,597)  30-40%
1  15,960,000   (17,565,426)  52%
8 $96,561,200  $(32,235,932)    

We had a $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 margin loan balance as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015.2017, respectively. The margin loan balance if any, would beis collateralized by the securities portfolio. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

 

Dividend income for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015totaled $13,099,317, $6,919,973, and 2014 totaled $5,607,403, $3,707,498, and $3,863,136, respectively. Interest income for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 totaled $8,989, $16,369 and $19,461, respectively.

 

The CompanyWe received proceeds of $22,774,768, $16,201,480$2,620,166, $17,274,946 and $14,279,391$22,774,768 on sales or redemptions of securities available for sale during fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The CompanyWe recorded the following realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions, net:net for the fiscal years ended September 30:

 

 2016 2015 2014  2018 2017 2016 
Gross realized gains $4,403,724  $880,424  $2,222,424  $112,272  $2,320,561  $4,403,724 
Gross realized losses  (5,125)  (74,911)  (55,658)  (885)  (8,847)  (5,125)
Gains on Sale of Securities Transactions, net $4,398,599  $805,513  $2,166,766  $111,387  $2,311,714  $4,398,599 

 

 120125 

 

The following is a listing of our investments in securities at September 30, 2016:2018:

 

   

Interest

Rate/

 

Number

of

   

Estimated

Market

 
Description Series Dividend Shares Cost Value  Series Interest Rate/ Dividend Number of Shares Cost Estimated
Market Value
 
Equity Securities - Preferred Stock:                                     
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  D   7.375%  30,000  $745,840  $750,300   D 7.375%  200,000  $4,807,782  $3,194,000 
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.  B   7.25%  30,600   718,317   786,417   B 7.25%  5,789   135,893   143,277 
Chesapeake Lodging Trust  A   7.75%  20,000   500,000   518,050 
Dynex Capital, Inc.  A   8.50%  10,000   250,000   252,850   A 8.50%  10,000   250,000   254,400 
Investors Real Estate Trust  B   7.95%  20,000   500,000   516,000 
iStar Financial, Inc.  D   8.00%  3,468   71,502   84,688   D 8.00%  3,468   71,502   86,492 
iStar Financial, Inc.  E   7.875%  3,400   54,116   83,300   I 7.50%  41,383   872,236   1,005,603 
iStar Financial, Inc.  F   8.00%  20,000   429,846   487,400 
iStar Financial, Inc.  I   7.50%  41,383   872,236   1,005,607 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  A   8.25%  44,000   1,100,885   1,128,380 
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.  B   7.875%  10,000   250,000   263,081 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)  A   8.25%  200,000   5,000,000   5,138,000 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)  B   8.00%  100,000   2,500,000   2,755,000   B 8.00%  100,000   2,500,000   2,625,700 
Total Equity Securities - Preferred Stock             $12,992,742  $13,769,073           $8,637,413  $7,309,472 

 

   

Number

of

   

Estimated

Market

 
Description    Shares Cost Value  Number of Shares Cost Estimated
Market Value
 
Equity Securities - Common Stock:                            
Gladstone Commercial Corporation      65,000  $1,102,608  $1,210,950 
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  4,000,000  $33,525,425  $15,960,000 
Franklin Street Properties  700,000   6,418,791   5,593,000 
Government Properties Income Trust      700,000   12,585,316   15,834,000   1,580,000   26,156,016   17,838,200 
Industrial Logistics Property Trust  100,000   2,116,778   2,301,000 
Kimco Realty Corporation  1,200,000   20,337,749   20,088,000 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  200,000   1,993,302   1,892,000 
Select Income REIT      586,500   13,112,908   15,776,850   800,000   17,394,728   17,552,000 
Senior Housing Property Trust      670,000   11,558,116   15,215,700   900,000   15,463,221   15,804,000 
VEREIT, Inc.  3,100,000   25,016,451   22,506,000 
Washington Prime Group, Inc.  1,300,000   10,541,616   9,490,000 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)      989,326   9,305,685   11,792,771   1,188,220   12,060,637   18,583,765 
Total Equity Securities - Common Stock         $47,664,633  $59,830,271      $171,024,714  $147,607,965 
                
 

Interest

Rate/

 

Number

of

 

Estimated

Market

 
 Dividend Shares Cost Value 
Modified Pass-Through Mortgage-Backed Securities:                
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)  6.50%  500,000  $5,252  $5,550 
                
Total Securities Available for Sale         $60,662,627  $73,604,894 

  Interest Rate/ Dividend  Number of Shares  Cost  Estimated
Market Value
 
Modified Pass-Through Mortgage-Backed Securities:                
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)  6.50%  500,000  $2,997  $3,108 
                 
Total Securities Available for Sale         $179,665,124  $154,920,545 

 

(1) Investment is in a related company. See Note No. 11 for further discussion.

 

 121126 

 

The following is a listing of our investments in securities at September 30, 2015:2017:

 

   

Interest

Rate/

 

Number

of

   

Estimated

Market

 
Description Series Dividend Shares Cost Value  Series Interest Rate/ Dividend Number of Shares Cost Estimated
Market Value
 
           
Equity Securities - Preferred Stock:                                     
Campus Crest Communities, Inc.  A   8.00%  10,000  $250,000  $243,300 
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  D   7.375%  30,000   745,840   750,900   D 7.375%  200,000  $4,807,782  $4,888,000 
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.  B   7.25%  30,600   718,317   727,975   B 7.25%  13,153   308,759   332,508 
Chesapeake Lodging Trust  A   7.75%  20,000   500,000   520,000 
Condor Hospitality  A   8.00%  17,000   170,005   108,800 
Corporate Office Properties Trust  L   7.375%  26,688   658,957   680,544 
Dynex Capital, Inc.  A   8.50%  10,000   250,000   241,000   A 8.50%  10,000   250,000   252,500 
EPR Properties  F   6.625%  15,000   352,908   369,750 
General Growth Properties, Inc.  A   6.375%  4,636   107,852   112,469 
Grace Acquisitions I  B   8.75%  29,000   3,480   696,000 
Investors Real Estate Trust  B   7.95%  20,000   500,000   515,200   B 7.95%  20,000   500,000   501,796 
iStar Financial, Inc.  D   8.00%  3,468   71,502   83,406   D 8.00%  3,468   71,502   87,744 
iStar Financial, Inc.  E   7.875%  3,400   54,116   80,410   E 7.875%  3,400   54,116   85,510 
iStar Financial, Inc.  F   8.00%  20,000   429,846   470,200   F 8.00%  20,000   429,846   503,200 
iStar Financial, Inc.  I   7.50%  41,383   872,236   953,464   I 7.50%  41,383   872,236   1,038,713 
Kilroy Realty Corporation  H   6.375%  23,016   547,953   575,142 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  A   8.25%  44,000   1,100,885   1,150,600 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  B   7.375%  30,455   760,911   772,034   A 8.25%  44,000   1,100,885   1,107,040 
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.  B   7.875%  10,000   250,000   260,000   B 7.875%  10,000   250,000   255,617 
Sun Communities, Inc.  A   7.125%  20,000   500,000   514,800 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)  A   8.25%  200,000   5,000,000   5,136,000   B  8.00%  100,000   2,500,000   2,766,000 
Total Equity Securities - Preferred Stock             $13,844,808  $14,961,994            $11,145,126  $11,818,628 

 

   

Number

of

   

Estimated

Market

 
Description    Shares Cost Value  Number of Shares Cost Estimated
Market Value
 
         
Equity Securities - Common Stock:                            
Getty Realty Corporation      50,000  $997,632  $790,000 
Gladstone Commercial Corporation      65,000   1,102,608   917,150 
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  2,700,000  $25,348,070  $22,653,000 
Franklin Street Properties  250,000   2,511,460   2,655,000 
Government Properties Income Trust      579,000   11,572,547   9,264,000   1,070,000   19,295,940   20,083,900 
Mack-Cali Realty Corporation      130,000   3,039,545   2,454,400 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  100,000   1,028,213   1,049,000 
Select Income REIT      586,500   13,247,860   11,149,365   620,000   13,907,816   14,520,400 
Senior Housing Property Trust      402,300   7,643,503   6,517,260   700,000   12,325,801   13,685,000 
VEREIT, Inc.  1,880,000   15,967,690   15,585,200 
Washington Prime Group, Inc.  500,000   4,428,175   4,165,000 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)      911,871   8,528,097   8,480,399   1,128,315   11,231,851   17,545,306 
Total Equity Securities - Common Stock         $46,131,792  $39,572,574      $106,045,016  $111,941,806 
                
 

Interest

Rate/

 

Number

of

 

Estimated

Market

 
 Dividend Shares Cost Value 
 
Modified Pass-Through Mortgage-Backed Securities:                
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)  6.50%  500,000  $6,240  $6,669 
                
Total Securities Available for Sale         $59,982,840  $54,541,237 

  Interest Rate/ Dividend  Number of Shares  Cost  Estimated
Market Value
 
Modified Pass-Through Mortgage-Backed Securities:                
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)  6.50%  500,000  $4,063  $4,336 
                 
Total Securities Available for Sale         $117,194,205  $123,764,770 

 

(1) Investment is in a related company. See Note No. 11 for further discussion.

 

 122127 

 

NOTE 7- MORTGAGE NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE

 

Mortgage Notes Payable:

 

Mortgage Notes Payable represents the principal amounts outstanding as of September 30, 2016.2018. Interest is payable on these mortgages at fixed rates ranging from 3.45% to 7.60%, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.48%4.07%. This compares to a weighted average interest rate of 4.85%4.18% as of September 30, 2015.2017. As of September 30, 2016,2018, the weighted average loan maturity of the Mortgage Notes Payable was 10.511.7 years. This compares to a weighted average loan maturity of the Mortgage Notes Payable of 9.011.6 years as of September 30, 2015.2017.

 

As described in Note 3, during fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we entered into eightseven mortgages totaling $141,586,000 in connection with the acquisitions of properties in Concord (Charlotte)Charleston, SC (FDX); Oklahoma City, OK; Savannah, GA; Daytona Beach, FL; Mobile, AL, Charleston, SC (FDX Ground) and Braselton (Atlanta), NC, Covington (New Orleans), LA, Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA, Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA, Colorado Springs, CO, Louisville, KY, Davenport (Orlando), FL and Olathe (Kansas City), KS. In addition, also described in Note 3, in connection with the 246,434 square foot expansionGA. These seven mortgages consisted of the Company’s property located in Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN), the Company refinanced its prior 3.76% interest rate mortgage with its existing lender of this property. At the time of the refinancing, the prior amortizing loan was approximately $13,158,000 and was set to mature in January 2023. The new loan is a 12four 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans, two 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans and one 10 year loan amortizing over 18 years. These seven mortgage loans originally totaled $175,160,000, with an original weighted average mortgage loan maturity of $25,000,00014.1 years and will mature in October 2028. Thea weighted average interest rate of the new loan remained the same as the prior loan at a fixed interest rate of 3.76%3.91%.

 

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we fully repaid the mortgages on Beltsville, MD; Granite City, IL; Griffin, GAmortgage loans for five of our properties located in Colorado Springs, CO; Richfield (Cleveland), OH; Tampa, FL; West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH and Wheeling, IL amounting to $14,739,654 atOrlando, FL, totaling approximately $12,487,000.

During the time they were repaid. In addition, the Companyfiscal year ended September 30, 2017, we fully repaid its fully amortized16 mortgage on its propertyloans associated with 15 of our properties located in St. Joseph, MO.Jacksonville, FL; El Paso, TX; Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH; Halfmoon (Albany), NY; Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH; Hanahan (Charleston), SC; Elgin (Chicago), IL; Kansas City, MO; Chattanooga, TN; Roanoke, VA; Orion, MI; Edwardsville, KS; Punta Gorda, FL; Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY and Cocoa, FL, totaling approximately $40,037,000.

 

The following is a summary of mortgage notes payable atour Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

 

 

Property

   

Fixed

Rate

  

Maturity

Date

 

Balance

9/30/16

  

Balance

9/30/15

 
              
St. Joseph, MO    8.12% 03/01/16 $-0-  $417,435 
Beltsville, MD (Washington, DC)    7.53% 05/01/16  -0-   419,505 
Beltsville, MD (Washington, DC)    5.25% 05/01/16  -0-   4,745,219 
Wheeling, IL (Chicago)    5.68% 09/05/16  -0-   3,457,456 
Griffin, GA (Atlanta)    6.37% 10/01/16  -0-   7,026,763 
Granite City, IL (St. Louis, MO)    7.11% 11/01/16  -0-   1,151,798 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX) (1)  6.92% 12/01/16  84,194   406,962 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX) (1)(2)  6.00% 12/01/16  1,300,000   1,300,000 
El Paso, TX    5.50% 01/05/17  3,259,726   3,611,052 
Bedford Heights, OH (Cleveland)    5.96% 04/01/17  2,685,791   2,862,734 
Chattanooga, TN    5.96% 05/01/17  1,551,081   1,774,568 
Elgin, IL (Chicago)    6.97% 05/01/17  349,658   844,690 
Hanahan, SC (Charleston) (SAIC)    7.36% 05/01/17  5,605,514   5,939,583 
Roanoke, VA    5.96% 05/30/17  2,519,243   2,819,927 
Edwardsville, KS (Kansas City)(Carlisle Tire)    7.38% 07/01/17  397,513   894,552 
Kansas City, MO (Kellogg)    6.11% 08/01/17  2,241,680   2,381,917 
Orion, MI    6.57% 09/01/17  8,580,058   9,095,386 
Cheektowaga, NY (Buffalo)    6.78% 10/01/17  343,548   639,095 
Punta Gorda, FL    6.29% 10/01/17  1,990,764   2,111,294 
Cocoa, FL    6.29% 12/01/17  5,063,864   5,364,157 
Richfield, OH (Cleveland)    5.22% 01/01/18  3,078,731   3,414,645 
Tampa, FL (FDX)    5.65% 04/01/18  3,900,447   4,132,523 
West Chester Twp., OH (Cincinnati)    6.80% 06/01/18  2,071,107   2,305,050 
Orlando, FL    6.56% 10/01/18  4,342,604   4,570,915 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)    6.00% 03/01/19  6,633,049   7,313,195 
Lebanon, OH (Cincinnati) (3)  5.55% 05/01/19  2,592,182   2,695,845 
Lebanon, TN (Nashville)    7.60% 07/10/19  7,659,116   7,856,077 
  9/30/2018  9/30/2017 
  Amount  Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate (1)
  Amount  Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate (1)
 
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable $719,768,355   4.07% $598,962,567   4.18%
                 
Debt Issuance Costs $11,715,985      $10,597,083     
Accumulated Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs  (3,493,279)      (2,998,887)    
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs $8,222,706      $7,598,196     
                 
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable, net of Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs $711,545,649      $591,364,371     

 

(1)Weighted average interest rate excludes amortization of debt issuance costs.

 

 123128 

 

The following is a summary of our mortgage notes payable by property at September 30, 2018 and 2017:

 

Property

   

Fixed

Rate

  

Maturity

Date

 

Balance

9/30/16

  

Balance

9/30/15

 
              
Ft. Mill, SC (Charlotte, NC)    7.00% 10/10/19 $1,926,986  $2,468,015 
Denver, CO    6.07% 11/01/19  1,059,646   1,354,284 
Hanahan, SC (Charleston) (FDX Ground)    5.54% 01/21/20  1,064,185   1,339,490 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)    5.54% 02/01/20  774,093   974,351 
Huntsville, AL    5.50% 03/01/20  795,594   991,088 
Colorado Springs, CO    5.41% 01/01/21  1,329,709   1,600,686 
Topeka, KS    6.50% 08/10/21  1,363,023   1,590,945 
Streetsboro, OH (Cleveland)    5.50% 11/01/21  10,446,469   10,972,757 
Kansas City, MO (Bunzl)    5.18% 12/01/21  6,958,091   7,107,312 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Anda Distribution)    4.80% 04/01/22  8,750,368   9,302,178 
Waco, TX    4.75% 08/01/22  4,799,919   5,063,021 
Houston, TX    6.88% 09/10/22  3,124,904   3,531,824 
Tolleson, AZ (Phoenix)    3.95% 11/01/22  5,299,383   6,043,710 
Edwardsville, KS (Kansas City) (International Paper)    3.45% 11/01/23  10,648,115   11,340,664 
Spring, TX (Houston)    4.01% 12/01/23  9,126,834   9,692,678 
Memphis, TN    4.50% 01/01/24  6,667,886   7,418,616 
Oklahoma City, OK    4.35% 07/01/24  4,401,832   4,863,512 
Indianapolis, IN    4.00% 09/01/24  12,289,676   13,161,911 
Frankfort, KY (Lexington)    4.84% 12/15/24  18,352,289   19,078,153 
Carrollton, TX (Dallas)    6.75% 02/01/25  7,960,781   8,640,732 
Altoona, PA (4)  4.00% 10/01/25  4,017,147   4,376,801 
Green Bay, WI (4)  4.00% 10/01/25  3,260,401   3,552,304 
Stewartville, MN (Rochester) (4)  4.00% 10/01/25  2,612,978   2,846,710 
Carlstadt, NJ (New York, NY)    5.25% 05/15/26  1,898,198   2,045,141 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)    3.84% 07/01/26  5,321,390   5,758,502 
Livonia, MI (Detroit)    4.45% 12/01/26  7,503,400   8,068,751 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool) (5)  3.76% 10/01/28  25,000,000   14,312,846 
Tulsa, OK    4.58% 11/01/28  1,934,175   2,050,342 
Lindale, TX (Tyler)    4.57% 11/01/29  6,378,382   6,723,881 
Sauget, IL (St. Louis, MO)    4.40% 11/01/29  9,701,419   10,233,837 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)    3.93% 12/01/29  18,453,112   19,494,453 
Imperial, PA (Pittsburgh)    3.63% 04/01/30  12,700,739   -0- 
Monroe, OH (Cincinnati)    3.77% 04/01/30  8,071,987   8,518,754 
Indianapolis, IN (Ulta)    3.91% 06/01/30  22,760,488   23,987,008 
Fort Worth, TX (Dallas)    3.56% 09/01/30  23,431,093   24,700,000 
Concord, NC (Charlotte)    3.87% 12/01/30  20,001,944   -0- 
Covington, LA (New Orleans)    4.08% 01/01/31  12,468,713   -0- 
Burlington, WA (Seattle/Everett)    3.67% 05/01/31  19,881,817   -0- 
Louisville, KY    3.74% 07/01/31  7,288,891   -0- 
Colorado Springs, CO    3.90% 07/01/31  18,576,282   -0- 
Davenport, FL (Orlando)    3.89% 09/01/31  26,400,000   -0- 
Olathe, KS (Kansas City)    3.96% 09/01/31  22,215,000   -0- 
Buckner, KY (Louisville)    4.17% 11/01/33  16,694,846   17,347,243 
Halfmoon, NY (Albany) (6)  5.25% 01/13/37  3,786,098   3,886,331 
Total Mortgage Notes Payable         $483,748,153  $373,991,174 

 

 

Property

    

Fixed

Rate

  

Maturity

Date

 Balance
9/30/18
  

Balance

9/30/17

 
               
Richfield, OH (Cleveland)  (1)   5.22% 01/01/18 $-0-  $2,724,856 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  (1)   5.65% 04/01/18  -0-   3,654,913 
West Chester Twp., OH (Cincinnati)  (1)   6.80% 06/01/18  -0-   1,820,753 
Orlando, FL  (1)   6.56% 10/01/18  -0-   4,098,856 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)      6.00% 03/01/19  5,144,319   5,910,953 
Lebanon, TN (Nashville)      7.60% 07/10/19  7,217,469   7,446,653 
Ft. Mill, SC (Charlotte, NC)      7.00% 10/10/19  724,766   1,346,845 
Denver, CO      6.07% 11/01/19  414,049   746,617 
Hanahan, SC (Charleston)(FDX Ground)      5.54% 01/21/20  465,749   773,234 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)      5.54% 02/01/20  338,789   562,454 
Huntsville, AL      5.50% 03/01/20  370,903   589,073 
Colorado Springs, CO  (1)   5.41% 01/01/21  -0-   1,043,704 
Topeka, KS      6.50% 08/10/21  860,364   1,119,836 
Streetsboro, OH (Cleveland)      5.50% 11/01/21  9,300,481   9,887,817 
Kansas City, MO      5.18% 12/01/21  6,633,001   6,799,803 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN)(Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)      4.80% 04/01/22  7,564,186   8,171,480 
Waco, TX      4.75% 08/01/22  4,234,777   4,524,045 
Houston, TX      6.88% 09/10/22  2,148,201   2,619,835 
Tolleson, AZ (Phoenix)      3.95% 11/01/22  3,719,709   4,525,118 
Edwardsville, KS (Kansas City)(International Paper)      3.45% 11/01/23  9,189,343   9,931,292 
Spring, TX (Houston)      4.01% 12/01/23  7,924,865   8,537,878 
Memphis, TN      4.50% 01/01/24  5,061,376   5,882,668 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)      4.35% 07/01/24  3,416,097   3,919,663 
Indianapolis, IN      4.00% 09/01/24  10,437,151   11,381,906 
Frankfort, KY (Lexington)      4.84% 12/15/24  16,639,132   17,560,855 
Carrollton, TX (Dallas)      6.75% 02/01/25  6,455,552   7,233,486 
Altoona, PA  (2)   4.00% 10/01/25  3,253,281   3,642,839 
Green Bay, WI  (2)   4.00% 10/01/25  2,640,432   2,956,605 
Stewartville, MN (Rochester)  (2)   4.00% 10/01/25  2,115,962   2,369,334 
Carlstadt, NJ (New York, NY)      5.25% 05/15/26  1,580,181   1,743,353 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)      3.84% 07/01/26  4,395,246   4,867,194 
Livonia, MI (Detroit)      4.45% 12/01/26  6,294,503   6,912,375 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)      3.64% 12/01/27  19,013,593   -0- 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool)      3.76% 10/01/28  21,722,567   23,461,936 
Tulsa, OK      4.58% 11/01/28  1,685,288   1,812,575 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)      4.13% 07/01/29  5,537,962   5,935,346 
Lindale, TX (Tyler)      4.57% 11/01/29  5,638,258   6,016,758 
Sauget, IL (St. Louis, MO)      4.40% 11/01/29  8,563,797   9,145,097 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)      3.93% 12/01/29  16,243,754   17,370,102 
Imperial, PA (Pittsburgh)      3.63% 04/01/30  11,199,661   11,963,800 
Monroe, OH (Cincinnati)      3.77% 04/01/30  7,126,384   7,608,083 
Greenwood, IN (Indianapolis)      3.91% 06/01/30  20,159,025   21,485,141 
Ft. Worth, TX (Dallas)      3.56% 09/01/30  20,753,864   22,116,268 
Concord, NC (Charlotte)      3.87% 12/01/30  17,813,451   18,928,835 
Covington, LA (New Orleans)      4.08% 01/01/31  11,133,990   11,814,941 
Burlington, WA (Seattle/Everett)      3.67% 05/01/31  17,757,364   18,839,050 
Louisville, KY      3.74% 07/01/31  6,525,135   6,914,142 
Colorado Springs, CO      3.90% 07/01/31  16,651,710   17,632,728 
Davenport, FL (Orlando)      3.89% 09/01/31  23,702,918   25,077,642 
Olathe, KS (Kansas City)      3.96% 09/01/31  19,956,867   21,108,249 
Hamburg, NY (Buffalo)      4.03% 11/01/31  21,328,714   22,532,881 
Ft. Myers, FL (FDX Ground)      3.97% 01/01/32  13,280,803   14,021,964 
Savannah, GA      3.53% 02/01/32  32,215,696   -0- 
Walker, MI (Grand Rapids)      3.86% 05/01/32  19,468,554   20,530,135 
Mesquite, TX (Dallas)      3.60% 07/01/32  30,928,224   32,623,355 

129

 

Property

 

Fixed

Rate

  

Maturity

Date

 

Balance

9/30/18

  

Balance

9/30/17

 
Aiken, SC (Augusta, GA)  4.20% 07/01/32 $14,471,117  $15,227,062 
Homestead, FL (Miami)  3.60% 07/01/32  23,313,676   24,591,465 
Mobile, AL  4.14% 07/01/32  18,832,395   -0- 
Concord, NC (Charlotte)  3.80% 09/01/32  24,863,355   26,184,000 
Kenton, OH  4.45% 10/01/32  11,473,387   12,000,000 
Stow, OH  4.17% 10/01/32  12,130,343   12,700,000 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  4.23% 12/01/32  13,683,131   -0- 
Daytona Beach, FL  4.25% 05/31/33  19,187,819   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  3.82% 09/01/33  29,860,000   -0- 
Braselton, GA (Atlanta)  4.02% 10/01/33  39,700,000   -0- 
Buckner, KY (Louisville)  4.17% 11/01/33  15,305,669   16,014,719 
Total Mortgage Notes Payable       $719,768,355  $598,962,567 

 

 (1)Loan was prepaid in full on November 1, 2016.
during fiscal 2018.
 (2)Loan is interest only.
(3)Interest rate is fixed at 5.55% through December 31, 2016. On January 1, 2017, the interest rate resets to the lender’s prevailing rate.
(4)One loan is secured by Altoona, PA, Green Bay, WI and Stewartville (Rochester), MN.
(5)Loan was refinanced extending the maturity from January 1, 2023 through October 1, 2028 and increasing loan amount to $25,000,000. Interest rate remained the same at 3.76%.
(6)Interest rate is fixed at 5.25% for the first 5 years. Commencing on January 13, 2017, the interest rate is adjusted every 5 years to the 5 year U.S. Treasury yield plus 265 basis points with a floor of 5.25%.

124

 

Principal on the foregoing debt at September 30, 20162018 is scheduled to be paid as follows:

 

Year Ending September 30, 2017 $57,791,871 
  2018  43,879,833 
  2019  47,464,988 
  2020  28,808,574 
  2021  29,255,776 
  Thereafter  276,547,111 
    $483,748,153 
Year Ending September 30, 2019 $60,151,223 
2020  48,605,542 
2021  50,098,257 
2022  72,031,353 
2023  50,522,349 
Thereafter  438,359,631 
  $719,768,355 

 

The above table does not include a fifteen15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $23,500,000$55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%, which was obtained subsequent to the 2018 fiscal yearend in connection with the purchase of onea property for $35,100,000 subsequent to the fiscal yearend at a fixed interest rate of 4.03%. In addition, the above table does not include commitments the Company has entered into to obtain five mortgage loans totaling $101,204,000 at fixed interest rates ranging from 3.60% to 4.20%, with a weighted average interest rate of 3.83%. Each of these five mortgage loan commitments are in connection with commitments to purchase five properties, currently under construction, totaling approximately $153,726,000. Each of these five mortgages will have fifteen year terms and consist of fully-amortizing loans.$85,248,000.

 

Loans Payable:

 

BMO Capital Markets

 

On August 27, 2015, the Company replaced its prior $60,000,000we obtained an unsecured revolving line of credit with a new unsecured line of credit facility (the “Facility”). The Facility is syndicated with three banks led by BMO, Capital Markets (“BMO”), as sole lead arranger and sole book runner, and Bank of Montreal as administrative agent, and includes JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“J.P. Morgan”)(J.P. Morgan) and RBC Capital Markets (“RBC”)(RBC) as co-syndication agents. The Facility provided for up to $130,000,000 in available borrowings with a $70,000,000 accordion feature, under the Facility, bringing the total potential availability up to $200,000,000, subject to certain conditions. The Facility was set to mature in August 2019 and had a one-year extension option, at the option of the Company.our option. On September 30, 2016, the Companywe entered into a firstan amendment to the Facility (the “Amendment”)Amendment), pursuant to which the Companywe exercised the $70,000,000 accordion feature under the Facility, bringing the maximum availability under the Facility to $200,000,000, and amended the Facility to provide an additional $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $300,000,000, subject to certain conditions, including, without limitation, obtaining commitments from additional lenders. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity date of the Facility from August 27, 2019 to September 30, 2020, with a one-year extension option, at theour option, of the Company, subject to certain conditions. Availability under the Facility through December 31, 2016, is limited to 70% of the value of the borrowing base properties, and is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties thereafter.properties. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a 7.0% capitalization rate to the net operating incomeNOI generated by the Company’sour unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Borrowings underEffective, March 22, 2018, the Facility, upcapitalization rate applied to the first 60% ofour NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties was lowered from 7.0% to 6.5%, thus increasing the value of the borrowing base properties under the terms of the agreement. Borrowings under the Facility, will, at the Company’sour election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140 basis points to 220 basis points, depending on the Company’sour leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 40 basis points to 120 basis points, depending on the Company’sour leverage ratio. The Company’s current borrowingsBased on our leverage ratios as of September 30, 2016 were less than 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties2018 and based on the Company’s leverage ratio as of September 30, 2016,2017, our borrowings under the Facility bearbore interest at LIBOR plus 150170 basis points, which was at an interest rate of 2.03%3.90% and 2.94% as of September 30, 2016.2018 and 2017, respectively. As of September 30, 2016, $76,000,0002018 and 2017, $160,000,000 and $110,000,000, respectively, was drawn down under the Facility. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility which reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.

 

 125130 

 

Two River Community Bank and The Bank of Princeton

The Company has total loans payable of $4,790,684 consisting of a $2,284,633 term loan secured by 200,000 shares of UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) 8.25% Series A preferred stock from Two River Community Bank at an annual interest rate of 4.90%, which was paid in full on October 28, 2016, and a $2,506,051 term loan secured by 500,000 shares of UMH common stock from The Bank of Princeton at a variable annual interest rate of prime plus 0.75% with a floor of 4.50%, maturing on March 9, 2017. The interest rate on the $2,506,051 term loan with The Bank of Princeton was 4.50% as of September 30, 2016.

Margin Loans

 

The Company fromFrom time to time useswe use a margin loan for purchasing securities, for temporary funding of acquisitions, and for working capital purposes. This loan is due on demand and is collateralized by the Company’sour securities portfolio. The CompanyWe must maintain a coverage ratio of approximately 50%. The interest rate charged on the margin loan is the bank’s margin rate and was 2.00%2.75% and 2.05% as of September 30, 20162018 and 2015.2017, respectively. At September 30, 20162018 and 2015,2017, there were no draws againstwas $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 outstanding on the margin loan, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

For the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, amortization of financing costs included in interest expense was $1,220,983, $1,234,259 and $1,116,238, respectively.

 

NOTE 8 - OTHER LIABILITIES

 

Other liabilities consist of the following as of September 30th:

 

 9/30/16  9/30/15  9/30/18 9/30/17 
Rent paid in advance $5,999,702  $5,081,537  $9,400,909  $9,108,097 
Unearned reimbursement revenue  2,407,717   2,037,018   5,814,937   3,996,340 
Deferred rent payable  

631,437

   

-0-

 
Tenant security deposits  464,287   434,554   715,177   582,170 
Other  365,429   282,359   495,599   578,911 
Total $9,868,572  $7,835,468  $16,426,622  $14,265,518 

 

NOTE 9 - STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

 

On July 26,At our Annual Meeting held on May 18, 2017, our common shareholders approved our Amended and Restated 2007 the 2007 Stock Option and StockIncentive Award Plan (the Plan) which extended the term of our 2007 Plan) was approved by the shareholders authorizing the grant to officers, directors and key employees, of options to purchase up to 1,500,000Incentive Award Plan for an additional 10 years, until March 13, 2027, added 1,600,000 shares of common stock. On May 6, 2010,stock to the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment and restatementshare reserve, expanded the types of awards available for grant under the 2007 Plan. The amendment and restatement made two significant changes: (1) the inclusion of directors as participants in the 2007 Plan and (2) the ability to grant restricted stock to directors, officers and key employees. The amendment and restatement also made other conforming, technical and other minor changes. The amendment also makes certain modifications and clarifications, including concerning administration and compliance with applicable tax rules, such as Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Options or restricted stock may be granted any time as determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee up through March 26, 2017. No option shall be available for exercise beyond ten years. All options are exercisable after one year from the date of grant. The option price shall not be below the fair market value at date of grant. Canceled or expired options are added backimprovements to the “pool” of shares available under the 2007 Plan.

 

The Compensation Committee, determinesin its capacity as Plan Administrator, shall determine, among other things: the recipients of each restricted stock award;awards; the type and number of restricted shares to be awarded;awards participants will receive; the lengthterms, conditions and forms of the restricted periodawards; the times and conditions subject to which awards may be exercised or become vested, deliverable or exercisable, or as to which any restrictions may apply or lapse; and may amend or modify the terms and conditions of an award, except that repricing of options or Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) is not permitted without shareholder approval.

No participant may receive awards during any calendar year covering more than 200,000 shares of common stock or more than $1,500,000 in cash. Regular annual awards granted to non-employee directors as compensation for services as non-employee directors during any fiscal year may not exceed $100,000 in value on the date of grant, and the grant date value of any special or one-time award upon election or appointment to the Board of Directors may not exceed $200,000.

Awards granted pursuant to the Plan generally may not vest until the first anniversary of the award; the restrictions applicable todate the award including, without limitation, the employment or retirement statuswas granted, provided, however, that up to 5% of the participant; rules governing forfeiture and restrictions applicableCommon Shares available under the Plan may be awarded to any sale, assignment, transfer, pledgeone or other encumbrance ofmore Eligible Individuals without the restricted stock during the restricted period; and the eligibility to share in dividends and other distributions paid to the Company’s shareholders during the restrictedminimum vesting period. The maximum number of shares underlying restricted stock awards that may be granted in any one fiscal year to a participant shall be 100,000.

 

 126131 

 

Unless otherwise provided for inIf an underlying restricted stock award agreement, if a participant’s status as an employee or director of the Company is terminated by reason of death or disability, the restrictions will lapse on such date. Unless otherwise provided for in an underlying restricted stock award agreement,made under the Plan provides that if an individual’s status as an employeeis forfeited, expires or director is terminated by reasonconverted into shares of retirement following an involuntary termination (other than for “cause” as definedanother entity in connection with a recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, exchange of shares or other similar event, or the Plan), the restrictions will generally lapse, unless the restricted stock award is intended to constitute “performance based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) ofsettled in cash, the Internal Revenue Code. If a participant’s status as an employeeshares associated with the forfeited, expired, converted or director terminates for any other reason, the Plan provides that a participantsettled award will generally forfeit any outstanding restricted stock awards, unless otherwise indicated in the applicable award agreement. Shares of restricted stock that are forfeited become available again for issuanceadditional awards under the Plan. The Compensation Committee has the authority to accelerate the time at which the restrictions may lapse whenever it considers that such action is in the best interests of the Company and of its shareholders, whether by reason of changes in tax laws, or a “change in control” as defined in the 2007 Plan or otherwise.

 

The Company accountsterm of any stock option or SAR generally may not be more than 10 years from the date of grant. The exercise price per common share under the Plan generally may not be below 100% of the fair market value of a common share at the date of grant.

We account for our stock options and restricted stock in accordance with ASC 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation. ASC 718-10 requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and amortized over the service period (generally equal to the vesting period).

 

Stock Options

 

During fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014,2018, one employee was granted options to purchase 65,000 shares eachshares. During fiscal year.2017, eleven employees were granted options to purchase 280,000 shares. During fiscal 2016, one employee was granted options to purchase 65,000 shares. The fair value of these options that were issued during the fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $48,100, $60,315,$119,600, $416,400, and $34,549 in fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively$48,100. The value of these options was determined based on the assumptions below and is being amortized over a one-year vesting period. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, amounts charged to compensation expense related to stock options totaled $51,334, $53,873$167,799, $350,364 and $35,910,$51,334, respectively. The remaining unamortized stock option expense was $12,085$29,900 as of September 30, 20162018 which will be expensed in fiscal 2017.2019.

 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:

 

 2016 2015 2014  2018 2017 2016 
              
Dividend yield  6.17%  5.38%  6.71%  3.82%  4.44%  6.17%
Expected volatility  20.20%  19.78%  19.07%  16.45%  18.84%  20.20%
Risk-free interest rate  2.09%  1.97%  2.45%  2.37%  2.26%  2.09%
Expected lives (years)  8   8   8   8   8   8 
Estimated forfeitures  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 

A summary of the status of our stock option plan as of September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

     2018     2017     2016 
  2018
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  2017
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  2016
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
                   
Outstanding at beginning of year  670,000  $11.75   455,000  $9.46   635,000  $8.68 
Granted  65,000   17.80   280,000   14.43   65,000   10.37 
Exercised  (40,000)  14.24   (65,000)  7.22   (245,000)  7.69 
Expired/Forfeited  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Outstanding at end of year  695,000   12.17   670,000   11.75   455,000   9.46 
                         
Exercisable at end of year  630,000       390,000       390,000     
                         
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year     $1.84      $1.49      $0.74 

 

 127132 

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plan as of September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:

     2016     2015     2014 
  2016
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  2015
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  2014
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
                   
Outstanding at beginning of year  635,000  $8.68   651,200  $8.29   750,370  $8.19 
Granted  65,000   10.37   65,000   11.16   65,000   8.94 
Exercised  (245,000)  7.69   (81,200)  7.54   (164,170)  8.08 
Expired/Forfeited  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Outstanding at end of year  455,000   9.46   635,000   8.68   651,200   8.29 
                         
Exercisable at end of year  390,000       570,000       586,200     
                         
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year     $0.74      $0.93      $0.53 

 

The following is a summary of stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2016:2018:

 

Date of Grant Number of Grants Number of Shares  Option Price  Expiration Date Number of Grants Number of Shares Option Price Expiration Date
                
01/05/10 1  65,000   7.22  01/05/18
01/03/11 1  65,000   8.72  01/03/19  1   65,000  $8.72  01/03/19
01/03/12 1  65,000   9.33  01/03/20  1   65,000   9.33  01/03/20
01/03/13 1  65,000   10.46  01/03/21  1   65,000   10.46  01/03/21
01/03/14 1  65,000   8.94  01/03/22  1   65,000   8.94  01/03/22
01/05/15 1  65,000   11.16  01/05/23  1   65,000   11.16  01/05/23
01/05/16 1  65,000   10.37  01/05/24  1   65,000   10.37  01/05/24
12/09/16  8   175,000   14.24  12/09/24
01/04/17  1   65,000   15.04  01/04/25
01/03/18  1   65,000   17.80  01/03/26
    455,000            695,000       

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015was $3,230,300, $2,974,400 and 2014 was $2,189,850, $816,800 and $1,212,984, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised in fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015was $141,304, $585,650, and 2014 was $884,350, $333,369, and $361,288, respectively. The weighted-average remaining contractual term of the above options was 4.2, 3.14.3, 5.1 and 2.74.2 years as of September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

 

Unrestricted Stock

Effective September 12, 2017, a portion of our quarterly directors’ fee was paid with our unrestricted common stock. During fiscal 2018, 3,670 unrestricted shares of common stock were granted with a weighted average fair value on the grant date of $16.10 per share. During fiscal 2017, 836 unrestricted shares of common stock were granted with a fair value on the grant date of $15.92 per share.

Restricted Stock

 

In October 2017, we awarded 12,500 shares of restricted stock to one participant under our Plan. In September 2017, we awarded 11,000 shares of restricted stock to eleven participants under our Plan. In September 2016, the Companywe awarded 40,000 shares of restricted stock to one participant under the 2007 Plan. In July 2015, the Company awarded 47,000 shares of restricted stock to twelve participants and in September 2015, the Company awarded 11,000 shares of restricted stock to eleven participants under the 2007 Plan. In July 2014, the Company awarded 10,000 shares of restricted stock to one participant under the 2007our Plan. The grant date fair value of restricted stock grants awarded to participants was $545,600, $572,840$205,875, $175,120 and $101,900$545,600 in fiscal 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively. These grants vest in equal installments over five years. As of September 30, 2016,2018, there remained a total of $675,813$484,543 of unrecognized restricted stock compensation related to outstanding non-vested restricted stock grants awarded under the 2007 Plan and outstanding at that date. Restricted stock compensation is expected to be expensed over a remaining weighted average period of 3.03.1 years. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, amounts charged to compensation expense related to restricted stock grants totaled $875,131, $395,022$207,008, $261,033 and $311,092,$875,131, respectively.

 

 128133 

 

A summary of the status of the Company’sour non-vested restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 are presented below:

 

   2016   2015   2014    2018   2017   2016 
 2016
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 2015
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 2014
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  2018
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 2017
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 2016
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
                          
Non-vested at beginning of year  123,496  $10.08   108,200  $9.96   131,666  $9.85   89,714  $12.15   117,897  $11.35   123,496  $10.08 
Granted  40,000   13.64   58,000   9.88   10,000   10.19   12,500   16.47   11,000   15.92   40,000   13.64 
Dividend Reinvested Shares  6,771   11.08   7,180   9.52   8,665   9.06   4,406   15.42   5,103   13.99   6,771   11.08 
Vested  (49,136)  (10.06)  (49,884)  (9.56)  (42,131)  (10.47)  (29,084)  (16.99)  (44,286)  (15.74)  (49,136)  (10.06)
Forfeited  (3,234)  (11.38)  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (3,234)  (11.38)
Non-vested at end of year  117,897  $11.35   123,496  $10.08   108,200  $9.96   77,536  $13.18   89,714  $12.15   117,897  $11.35 

 

As of September 30, 2016,2018, there were 444,8781,671,872 shares available for grant as stock options or restricted stock under the 2007 Plan.

 

NOTE 10 - INCOME FROM LEASES

 

The Company derivesWe derive income primarily from operating leases on itsour commercial properties. In general, these leases are written for periods up to ten10 years or more with various provisions for renewal. These leases generally contain clauses for reimbursement (or direct payment) of real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses of the properties. As of September 30, 2016, the Company2018, we had a weighted average lease maturity of 7.4 years. Minimum8.1 years and our average annualized rent per occupied square foot was $6.01. Approximate minimum base rents due under non-cancellable leases as of September 30, 20162018 are approximately scheduled as follows:

 

Fiscal Year Amount  Amount 
2017 $87,518,000 
2018  81,220,000 
2019  73,506,000  $122,292,000 
2020  69,080,000  120,007,000 
2021  67,604,000  118,094,000 
2022 111,474,000 
2023 106,679,000 
thereafter  307,898,000   499,883,000 
Total $686,826,000  $1,078,429,000 

 

NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

There are sixFive of our 13 directors of the Company who are also directors and shareholders of UMH. The Company holdsWe hold common and preferred stock of UMH in itsour securities portfolio. See Note 6 for current holdings. During fiscal 2016, the Company2018, we made total purchases of 77,45659,905 common shares of UMH for a total cost of $777,588,$828,787, or a weighted average cost of $10.04$13.84 per share, of which 67,456 shares were purchased through UMH’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. In addition, the Company made total purchases 100,000 shares of UMH’s 8.00% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a total cost of $2,500,000. During fiscal 2016,2018, UMH made total purchases of 120,098101,304 of our common shares of the Company through the Company’sour DRIP for a total cost of $1,348,141,$1,566,624, or a weighted average cost of $11.23$15.46 per share.

 

The Company currently has thirteenAs of September 30, 2018, we had fourteen full-time employees and one part-time employee. One of the Company’s employees (Director of Investor Relations, promoted to Vice President of Investor Relations in June 2015) was shared with a related entity, UMH, through September 30, 2015. Through September 30, 2015, the Vice President of Investor Relations’ salary was allocated 70% to the Company and 30% to UMH based on the time she worked for each entity. Effective October 1, 2015, the Vice President of Investor Relations began working solely for the Company at which point the Company no longer allocates any portion of her salary to UMH. In addition, the Company’sOur Chairman of the Board is also the Chairman of the Board of UMH. Effective as of October 1, 2015, otherOther than the Company’sour Chairman of the Board, the Company doeswe do not share any employees with UMH.

 

129

Some general and administrative expenses are allocated between the Company and UMH based on use or services provided. These allocations are reviewed by our Audit Committee. Net shared expenses charged by UMH to the Company for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016,Effective January 12, 2015, and 2014 were $55,196, $158,727 and $394,927, respectively.

On August 22, 2014, the Companywe entered into a seven-year lease agreement to occupy 5,680 square feet for the Company’s newour current corporate office space. The new corporate office space is located in a new separate suite located in the same building as the Company’s former corporate office space. The lease became effective January 12, 2015, at which time, the Company ceased to share rent expense with UMH. Rent for the Company’s newour current corporate office space is at an annual rate of $99,400 or $17.50 per square foot for years one through five and an annual rate of $100,820 or $17.75 per square foot for years six and seven. The Company isWe are also responsible for itsour proportionate share of real estate taxes and common area maintenance. Mr. Eugene W. Landy, the Founder and Chairman of the Board, of the Company, owns a 24% interest in the entity that is the landlord of the property where the Company’s newour corporate office space is located. We believe that the aforesaid rent is no more than what we would pay for comparable space elsewhere.

134

 

Daniel D. Cronheim is a directorone of the Companyour directors and is also an Executive Vice President of David Cronheim Company (Cronheim) and Cronheim Management Services, Inc. (CMSI). Daniel Cronheim received $49,500, $47,000$73,323, $75,880 and $42,000$49,500 for director’s fees in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We have not paid any fees to The David Cronheim Mortgage Corporation, an affiliated company of CMSI, received $-0-, $196,000 and $140,000 in mortgage brokerage commissions inover the last three fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.years.

 

The industrial property in Carlstadt, New Jersey is owned by Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLC. The Company owns 51% of Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLC. This property is managed by Marcus Associates, an entity affiliated with the 49% non-controlling interest. Annual management fees of $15,804 were paid to Marcus Associates for each of the fiscal years ended 2016, 2015 and 2014.

NOTE 12 - TAXES

 

Income Tax

 

The Company hasWe have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code under Sections 856 to 860 and the comparable New Jersey Statutes. Under such provisions, the Companywe will not be taxed on that portion of itsour taxable income distributed currently to shareholders, provided that at least 90% of itsour taxable income is distributed. As the Company haswe have and intendsintend to continue to distribute all of itsour income, currently no provision has been made for income taxes. If the Company failswe fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, itwe will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifieswe qualify for taxation as a REIT, the Companywe may be subject to certain state and local taxes on itsour income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on itsour undistributed taxable income. In addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to federal, state, and local income taxes.

 

Federal Excise Tax

 

The Company doesWe do not have a Federal excise tax liability for the calendar years 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, since it intendswe intend to or hashave distributed all of itsour annual Federal taxable net income.

 

130

Reconciliation Between U.S. GAAP Net Income and Taxable Income

 

The following table reconciles net income attributableNet Income Attributable to common shares to taxable income for the years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:

 

 2016
Estimated
 2015
Actual
 2014
Actual
  2018
Estimated
(unaudited)
 2017
Actual
 2016
Actual
 
 (unaudited)     
Net income applicable to common shareholders $20,531,888  $16,998,783  $11,238,262 

Net income attributable to common shareholders

 $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888 
Book / tax difference on gains realized from capital transactions  (4,398,599)  (5,824,405)  (2,166,766)  (7,596,653)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)
Stock compensation expense  926,465   448,895   347,002   433,895   624,706   926,465 
Deferred compensation  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Other book / tax differences, net  (232,914)  2,342,751   (150,831)  (1,038,925)  (1,596,068)  1,298,104 
Taxable income before adjustments  16,826,840   13,966,024   9,267,667   30,613,661   19,659,158   18,357,858 
Add: capital gains  3,774,099   5,000,683   973,761   7,996,653   566,903   3,643,569 
Estimated taxable income subject to 90% dividend requirement $20,600,939  $18,966,707  $10,241,428  $38,610,314  $20,226,061  $22,001,427 

 

Reconciliation Between Cash Dividends Paid and Dividends Paid Deduction

 

The following table reconciles cash dividends paid with the dividends paid deduction for the years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:

 

 2016
Estimated
 2015
Actual
 2014
Actual
 
 (unaudited)      2018     
        Estimated
(unaudited)
 2017
Actual
 2016
Actual
 
Cash dividends paid $42,034,183  $35,522,127  $29,531,430  $53,586,063  $46,289,248  $42,034,183 
Less: Portion designated capital gains distribution  (3,774,099)  (5,000,683)  (973,761)  (7,996,653)  (566,903)  (3,643,569)
Less: Return of capital  (9,470,625)  (2,939,882)  (9,856,777)  (14,975,748)  (7,361,734)  (7,828,595)
Estimated dividends paid deduction $28,789,459  $27,581,562  $18,700,892  $30,613,662  $38,360,611  $30,562,019 

135

 

NOTE 13 - SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Common Stock

 

The CompanyWe have implemented a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the DRIP) effective December 15, 1987, as amended.1987. Under the terms of the DRIP, and subsequent amendments,as subsequently amended, shareholders who participate may reinvest all or part of their dividends in additional shares of the Company at a discounted price (approximately 95% of market value) directly from the Company,us, from authorized but unissued shares of the Companyour common stock. According to the terms of the DRIP, shareholdersShareholders may also purchase additional shares through the DRIP by making optional cash payments monthly.

 

Amounts received in connection with the DRIP and shares issued in connection with the DRIP for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 20142016 were as follows:

 

  2016  2015  2014 
          
Amounts received $72,175,797  $48,404,556  $38,090,334 
Less: Dividend reinvestments  8,369,146   8,489,169   7,624,528 
Amounts received, net $63,806,651  $39,915,387  $30,465,806 
             
Number of Shares Issued  6,515,750   4,975,500   4,296,075 

131
  2018  2017  2016 
          
Amounts received $90,028,789  $91,931,831  $72,175,797 
Less: Dividend reinvestments  12,928,356   10,125,894   8,369,146 
Amounts received, net $77,100,433  $81,805,937  $63,806,651 
             
Number of Shares Issued  5,816,443   6,632,713   6,515,750 

 

The following cash distributions were paid to common shareholders during the years ended September 30, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016:

 

 2016 2015 2014  2018 2017 2016 
Quarter Ended Amount Per Share Amount Per Share Amount Per Share  Amount Per Share Amount Per Share Amount Per Share 
             
December 31 $10,083,160  $0.16  $8,598,414  $0.15  $6,815,308  $0.15  $13,016,721  $0.17  $11,184,399  $0.16  $10,083,160  $0.16 
March 31  10,384,295   0.16   8,765,446   0.15   7,030,326   0.15  13,302,878   0.17   11,428,917   0.16   10,384,295   0.16 
June 30  10,647,332   0.16   8,952,767   0.15   7,182,521   0.15  13,522,569   0.17   11,697,727   0.16   10,647,332   0.16 
September 30  10,919,396   0.16   9,205,500   0.15   8,503,275   0.15   13,743,895   0.17   11,978,205   0.16   10,919,396   0.16 
 $42,034,183  $0.64  $35,522,127  $0.60  $29,531,430  $0.60  $53,586,063  $0.68  $46,289,248  $0.64  $42,034,183  $0.64 

 

On October 1, 2015, the Company’sour Board of Directors approved a 6.7% increase in the Company’sour quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.16 per share from $0.15 per share. This representsrepresented an annualized dividend rate of $0.64 per share. The Company hasOn October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved a 6.3% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.17 per share from $0.16 per share. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.68 per share. These two dividend raises represent a total increase of 13%. We have maintained or increased itsour common stock cash dividend for twenty-five27 consecutive years. On October 3, 2016, the Company’s1, 2018, our Board of Directors declaredapproved a quarterlycash dividend of $0.16$0.17 per share, of its common stock to be paid on December 15, 201617, 2018, to shareholders of record as ofat the close of business on November 15, 2016.2018. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.68 per share.

 

On May 28, 2014, the CompanySubsequent to fiscal year end, in October 2018, we completed a public offering of 8,050,0009,200,000 shares of the Company’sour Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,050,0001,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $8.50$15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. The CompanyWe received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $65,113,000.$132,339,000.

 

Preferred Stock

 

On September 13, 2016, the Company issued 5,400,000 shares of a 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Series C Preferred Stock) at an offering price of $25.00 per share in an underwritten public offering. The Company received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses, of approximately $130,543,000. On September 15, 2016, the Company used $45,000,000 of such net proceeds from the offering to reduce the amounts outstanding under its Facility and on October 14, 2016, the Company used $53,493,750 of such net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of the 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of its 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (7.625% Series A Preferred Stock). In addition, on October 14, 2016, the Company used $498,540 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, to and including the redemption date of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. The Company intends to use the remaining proceeds to reduce the amounts outstanding under its Facility and to purchase properties and fund expansions of its existing properties in the ordinary course of business and for general corporate purposes.

 

On September 14, 2016, the Companywe announced that itwe intended to redeem all 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of itsour 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. As discussed above, the CompanyStock, $0.01 par value per share (7.625% Series A Preferred Stock). We redeemed all of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock on October 14, 2016 at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all dividends accrued and unpaid to and including the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.23299 per share. As of September 30, 2016, the outstanding 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock has beenwas reclassified out of stockholder'sstockholder’s equity and iswas reflected as a liability at redemption value and the Company haswe recognized a deemed dividend of $2,942,149 on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, which represents the difference between redemption value and carrying value net of original deferred issuance costs.

136

 

Prior to its redemption, the annual dividend of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock was $1.90625 per share, or 7.625%, of the $25.00 per share liquidation value and was payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15.

 

132

The Company’sOur Board of Directors have declaredhas authorized and the Company haswe have paid the following dividends on the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 20152017 and 2014:2016:

 

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
           
10/1/15 11/16/15 12/15/15 $1,019,725  $0.4765625 
1/19/16 2/16/16 3/15/16  1,019,726   0.4765625 
4/5/16 5/16/16 6/15/16  1,019,725   0.4765625 
7/1/16 8/15/16 9/15/16  1,019,726   0.4765625 
      $4,078,902  $1.90625 

Declaration

Date

  

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
(1)9/14/16 10/14/16 10/14/16 $498,540  $0.23299 

 

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
           
10/1/14 11/17/14 12/15/14 $1,019,725  $0.4765625 
1/21/15 2/17/15 3/16/15  1,019,726   0.4765625 
4/1/15 5/15/15 6/15/15  1,019,725   0.4765625 
7/1/15 8/17/15 9/15/15  1,019,726   0.4765625 
      $4,078,902  $1.90625 
(1)Represents final dividend payment at time of redemption of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock

 

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
           
10/1/13 11/15/13 12/16/13 $1,019,725  $0.4765625 
1/15/14 2/18/14 3/17/14  1,019,726   0.4765625 
4/1/14 5/15/14 6/16/14  1,019,725   0.4765625 
7/1/14 8/15/14 9/15/14  1,019,726   0.4765625 
      $4,078,902  $1.90625 

Declaration

Date

 

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
10/1/15 11/16/15 12/15/15 $1,019,725  $0.4765625 
1/19/16 2/16/16 3/15/16  1,019,726   0.4765625 
4/5/16 5/16/16 6/15/16  1,019,725   0.4765625 
7/1/16 8/15/16 9/15/16  1,019,726   0.4765625 
      $4,078,902  $1.9062500 

 

As7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

On May 5, 2017, we announced that we intended to redeem all 2,300,000 issued and outstanding shares of September 30, 2016, the Company has a total of 2,300,000 shares ofour 7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, (Series$0.01 par value per share (7.875% Series B Preferred Stock). We redeemed all of the outstanding representingshares of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock on June 7, 2017, at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, totaling $57,500,000, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends for the period from June 1, 2017 up to and not including, the redemption date, in an aggregateamount equal to $0.0328125, totaling $75,469, for a total cash payment of $25.0328125 per share, totaling $57,575,469. We recognized a deemed dividend of $2,467,165 on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, which represents the difference between redemption value and carrying value net of original deferred issuance costs.

Prior to its redemption, the annual dividend of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock was $1.96875 per share, or 7.875%, of the $25.00 per share liquidation value and was payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15.

Our Board of Directors has authorized and we have paid the following dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

Declaration

Date

  

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
 10/3/16  11/15/16 12/15/16 $1,132,032  $0.4921875 
 1/17/17  2/15/17 3/15/17  1,132,033   0.4921875 
 4/4/17  5/15/17 6/15/17  1,132,032   0.4921875 
(1)5/5/17 6/7/17 6/7/17  75,470   0.0328125 
        $3,471,567  $1.5093750 

(1)Represents final dividend payment at time of redemption of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
10/1/15 11/16/15 12/15/15 $1,132,032  $0.4921875 
1/19/16 2/16/16 3/15/16  1,132,033   0.4921875 
4/5/16 5/16/16 6/15/16  1,132,032   0.4921875 
7/1/16 8/15/16 9/15/16  1,132,033   0.4921875 
      $4,528,130  $1.9687500 

137

6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

On September 13, 2016, we issued 5,400,000 shares of 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (6.125% Series C Preferred Stock), at an offering price of $25.00 per share in an underwritten public offering. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses, of approximately $130,543,000. On September 15, 2016, we used $45,000,000 of such net proceeds from the offering to reduce the amounts outstanding under our Facility and on October 14, 2016, and as discussed above, we used $53,493,750 of such net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of the 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of our 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, on October 14, 2016, we used $498,540 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, up to and including the redemption date of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock.

On March 9, 2017, we issued an additional 3,000,000 shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, liquidation preference of $57,500,000.$25.00 per share, at a public offering price of $24.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $73,500,000 before deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses. Net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses were approximately $71,003,000. As discussed above, we used the net proceeds from this offering to redeem all of the outstanding shares of our 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, we used $75,469 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, up to and not including the redemption date of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock.

On June 29, 2017, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or B. Riley (formerly FBR Capital Markets & Co.), that provided for the offer and sale of shares of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, or our 6.125% Series C preferred stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000 of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock. Sales of shares of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock under the Preferred Stock ATM Program are in “at the market offerings” as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act, including, without limitation, sales made directly on or through the NYSE, or on any other existing trading market for the 6.125% Series C preferred stock or to or through a market maker or any other method permitted by law, including, without limitation, negotiated transactions and block trades. We began selling shares through these programs on July 3, 2017. Since inception through September 30, 2018, we sold 3,088,001 shares under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000, of which 1,648,556 shares were sold during the fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $40,094,000. As of September 30, 2018, there is approximately $119,096,000 remaining that may be sold under the Preferred Stock ATM Program.

As of September 30, 2018, 11,488,001 shares of the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

We have been and we intend to continue to use the proceeds raised through the Preferred Stock ATM Program to purchase properties and fund expansions of our existing properties in the ordinary course of business and for general corporate purposes.

138

Our Board of Directors has authorized and we have paid the following dividends on our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:

Declaration

Date

 

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
10/2/17 11/15/17 12/15/17 $4,080,685  $0.3828125 
1/16/18 2/15/18 3/15/18  4,220,657   0.3828125 
4/2/18 5/15/18 6/15/18  4,247,507   0.3828125 
7/2/18 8/15/18 9/17/18  4,327,683   0.3828125 
      $16,876,532  $1.53125 

Declaration

Date

 

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
10/3/16 11/15/16 12/15/16 $1,791,563  $0.3317708 
1/17/17 2/15/17 3/15/17  2,067,190   0.3828125 
4/4/17 5/15/17 6/15/17  3,215,629   0.3828125 
7/3/17 8/15/17 9/15/17  3,455,985   0.3828125 
      $10,530,367  $1.4802083 

 

The annual dividend of the 6.125% Series BC Preferred Stock is $1.96875$1.53125 per share, or 7.875%6.125% of the $25.00 per share liquidation value and is payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15. The 6.125% Series BC Preferred Stock has no maturity and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless redeemed or otherwise repurchased. Except in limited circumstances relating to the Company’sour qualification as a REIT, and as described below, the 6.125% Series BC Preferred Stock is not redeemable prior to June 7, 2017.September 15, 2021. On and after June 7, 2017,September 15, 2021, at any time and, from time to time, the 6.125% Series BC Preferred Stock will be redeemable in whole, or in part, at the Company’sour option, at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to the date of redemption.

 

Upon the occurrence of a Delisting Event, as defined in the Articles Supplementary (the “Series B(Series C Articles Supplementary”)Supplementary) classifying and designating the 6.125% Series BC Preferred Stock, the Companywe may, at itsour option and subject to certain conditions, redeem the 6.125% Series BC Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, within 90 days after the Delisting Event, for a cash redemption price per share of 6.125% Series BC Preferred Stock equal to $25.00 plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not declared), to, but not including, the redemption date.

 

Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, as defined in the Series BC Articles Supplementary, the Companywe may, at itsour option and subject to certain conditions, redeem the Series B Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, within 120 days after the first date on which such Change of Control occurred, for a cash redemption price per share of Series B Preferred Stock equal to $25.00 plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not declared) to, but not including, the redemption date.

133

The Company’s Board of Directors have declared and the Company has paid the following dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock for the year ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
           
10/1/15 11/16/15 12/15/15 $1,132,032  $0.4921875 
1/19/16 2/16/16 3/15/16  1,132,033   0.4921875 
4/5/16 5/16/16 6/15/16  1,132,032   0.4921875 
7/1/16 8/15/16 9/15/16  1,132,033   0.4921875 
      $4,528,130  $1.96875 

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
           
10/1/14 11/17/14 12/15/14 $1,132,032  $0.4921875 
1/21/15 2/17/15 3/16/15  1,132,033   0.4921875 
4/1/15 5/15/15 6/15/15  1,132,032   0.4921875 
7/1/15 8/17/15 9/15/15  1,132,033   0.4921875 
      $4,528,130  $1.96875 

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
           
10/1/13 11/15/13 12/16/13 $1,132,032  $0.4921875 
1/15/14 2/18/14 3/17/14  1,132,033   0.4921875 
4/1/14 5/15/14 6/16/14  1,132,032   0.4921875 
7/1/14 8/15/14 9/15/14  1,132,033   0.4921875 
      $4,528,130  $1.96875 

On October 3, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.4921875 per share to be paid December 15, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 15, 2016.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company has a total of 5,400,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding representing an aggregate liquidation preference of $135,000,000.

The annual dividend of the Series C Preferred Stock is $1.53125 per share, or 6.125% of the $25.00 per share liquidation value and is payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless redeemed or otherwise repurchased. Except in limited circumstances relating to the Company’s qualification as a REIT, and as described below, the Series C Preferred Stock is not redeemable prior to September 15, 2021. On and after September 15, 2021, at any time and, from time to time, the Series C Preferred Stock will be redeemable in whole, or in part, at the Company’s option, at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to the date of redemption.

Upon the occurrence of a Delisting Event, as defined in the Articles Supplementary (the “Series C Articles Supplementary”) classifying and designating the Series C Preferred Stock, the Company may, at its option and subject to certain conditions, redeem the Series C Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, within 90 days after the Delisting Event, for a cash redemption price per share of Series C Preferred Stock equal to $25.00 plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not declared), to, but not including, the redemption date.

134

Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, as defined in the Series C Articles Supplementary, the Company may, at its option and subject to certain conditions, redeem the Series C Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, within 120 days after the first date on which such Change of Control occurred, for a cash redemption price per share of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock equal to $25.00 plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not declared) to, but not including, the redemption date.

 

On October 3, 2016, the Company’s1, 2018, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend for the period September 13, 20161, 2018 through November 30, 2016,2018, of $0.3317708$0.3828125 per share to be paid December 15, 201617, 2018 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 15, 2016.2018.

 

Repurchase of Stock

 

On January 19, 2016,16, 2018, the Board of Directors reaffirmed itsour Share Repurchase Program (the Repurchase(Repurchase Program) that authorizes the Companyus to purchase up to $10,000,000 in the aggregate of the Company’sour common stock. The Repurchase Program was originally created on March 3, 2009 and is intended to be implemented through purchases made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or block trades, or by any combination of such methods, in accordance with applicable insider trading and other securities laws and regulations. The size, scope and timing of any purchases will be based on business, market and other conditions and factors, including price, regulatory and contractual requirements or consents, and capital availability. The Repurchase Program does not require the Companyus to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the program may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time at the Company’sour discretion without prior notice. The CompanyWe did not reacquire any of itsour shares of Common Stock during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016,2018, nor does the Companydo we possess any reacquired shares of Common Stock as of September 30, 2016.2018. The maximum dollar value that may be purchased under the Repurchase Program as of September 30, 20162018 is $10,000,000.

139

 

NOTE 14 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Company followsWe follow ASC 825, Financial Instruments, for financial assets and liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. We measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, including securities available for sale. Our financial assets consist mainly of marketable REIT securities. The fair value of these certain financial assets was determined using the following inputs at September 30, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

 

  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
  Total  Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)  Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)  Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
September 30, 2016:                
Securities available for sale $73,604,894  $73,604,894  $-0-  $-0- 
September 30, 2015:                
Securities available for sale $54,541,237  $54,541,237  $-0-  $-0- 

135
  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
  Total  

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

  

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

  

Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 
September 30, 2018:                
Securities available for sale $154,920,545  $154,920,545  $-0-  $-0- 
September 30, 2017:                
Securities available for sale $123,764,770  $123,764,770  $-0-  $-0- 

 

In addition to the Company’sour investments in Securities Available for Sale at Fair Value, the Company iswe are required to disclose certain information about fair values of itsour other financial instruments. Estimates of fair value are made at a specific point in time based upon, where available, relevant market prices and information about the financial instrument. Such estimates do not include any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’sour entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. For a portion of the Company’sour other financial instruments, no quoted market value exists. Therefore, estimates of fair value are necessarily based on a number of significant assumptions (many of which involve events outside the control of management)our control). Such assumptions include assessments of current economic conditions, perceived risks associated with these financial instruments and their counterparties; future expected loss experience and other factors. Given the uncertainties surrounding these assumptions, the reported fair values represent estimates only, and therefore cannot be compared to the historical accounting model. The use of different assumptions or methodologies is likely to result in significantly different fair value estimates.

 

The fair value of Cash and Cash Equivalents approximates their current carrying amounts since all such items are short-term in nature. The fair value of variable rate Loans Payable approximates their current carrying amounts since such amounts payable are at approximately a weighted-average current market rate of interest. The estimated fair value of fixed rate mortgage notes payable is based on discounting the future cash flows at a year-end risk adjusted borrowing rate currently available to the Companyus for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. These fair value measurements fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At September 30, 2016,2018, the fixed rate Mortgage Notes Payable fair value (estimated based upon expected cash outflows discounted at current market rates) amounted to $493,675,000$706,745,000 and the carrying value amounted to $483,748,153. At September 30, 2016 the fixed rate Loans Payable fair value (estimated based upon expected cash outflows discounted at current market rates) amounted to $4,800,000 and the carrying value amounted to $4,790,684.$719,768,355. When the Company acquireswe acquired a property, prior to April 1, 2017, that was accounted for as a business combination, it iswas required to fair value all of the assets and liabilities, including intangible assets and liabilities, relating to the properties acquired lease (See Note 3). Those fair value measurements fallwere estimated based on independent third-party appraisals and fell within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

NOTE 15 - CASH FLOW

 

During fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Companywe paid cash for interest of $21,967,741, $18,617,553$31,335,763, $24,290,811 and $16,191,170,$21,967,741, respectively.

 

During fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015we had $12,928,356, $10,125,894 and 2014, the Company had $8,369,146, $8,489,169 and $7,624,528, respectively, of dividends which were reinvested that required no cash transfers.

 

140

NOTE 16 – CONTINGENCIES, COMMITMENTS AND COMMITMENTSLEGAL MATTERS

 

From time to time, the Companywe can be subject to claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business. Management doesWe do not believe that any such claim or litigation will have a material adverse effect on theour consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.

 

In addition to the property purchased subsequent to theour fiscal yearend, as described below in Note 17, we have entered into agreements to purchase eighttwo new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Florida, Michigan,Georgia and North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina totalingconsisting of approximately 2,099,000398,000 square feet, each with net-leased terms ranging between tenfrom 10 to fifteen15 years, with a weighted average lease maturityterm of 13.313.4 years. Approximately 1,267,000 square feet, or 60%, is leased to FDX and its subsidiaries.  The purchase price for the eightthese properties is approximately $212,373,000.$68,747,000 and both are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing these eight transactions during the first quarter of fiscal 20172019 and fiscal 2018.2020.  In connection with fiveone of the eightthese properties, the Company haswe have entered into commitmentsa commitment to obtain five mortgages totaling $101,204,000 at fixed rates ranging from 3.60% to 4.20%,a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $17,500,000 with a weighted averagefixed interest rate of 3.83%4.40%. Each of these mortgages will be a fifteen year, fully-amortizing loan.

 

136

We currently have one 154,800 square foot property expansion in progress at our property located in Monroe, OH which is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2019 for a total project cost of approximately $9,072,000. The expansion will result in a new 15 year lease which will extend the prior lease expiration date from February 2030 to January 2034. In addition, the expansion will result in an increase in initial annual rent effective from the date of completion by approximately $862,000 from approximately $961,000, or $4.14 per square foot, to approximately $1,823,000, or $4.71 per square foot. In addition, the annual rent will increase 2% per annum.

 

NOTE 17 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

Material subsequent events have been evaluated and are disclosed herein.

 

OnSubsequent to fiscal yearend, in October 1, 2016,2018, we completed a 50,741 square foot expansionpublic offering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the building leasedunderwriters’ option to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Edinburg, TX was completed forpurchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a costprice of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $4,988,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 through September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $5.27 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000, or $6.68 per square foot.$132,339,000.

 

OnSubsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 17, 2016, the Company19, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 338,584347,145 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.0 acres, located in Hamburg, NY, which is in the Buffalo MSA.Trenton, NJ. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for fifteen15 years through March 2031.June 2032. The purchase price was $35,100,000. The Company$85,248,352. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $23,500,000$55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.03%4.13%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,308,000.

On October 27, 2016, the Company sold its only vacant building (which increased our occupancy rate from 99.6% to 100.0%) consisting of a 59,425 square foot industrial building situated on 4.78 acres located in White Bear Lake, MN for approximately $4,272,000, which is the Company’s approximate U.S. GAAP net book carrying value.$5,328,000.

 

The industrial propertiesproperty purchased expanded and soldthus far during fiscal 2017 to date2019 increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 16,340,000 and increased our occupancy rate to 100.0%.21,521,000.

 

On September 14, 2016, the Company announced that it intendedSubsequent to redeem all 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of its 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. The Company redeemed the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stockfiscal yearend, on October 14, 2016 at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, totaling $53,493,750, plus all dividends accrued and unpaid to and including the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.23299 per share, totaling $498,540, for a total cash payment of $25.23299 per share, totaling $53,992,290. As of September 30, 2016, the outstanding 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock has been reclassified out of stockholder's equity and is reflected as a liability at redemption value and the Company has recognized a deemed dividend of $2,942,1499, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016,Facility which represents the difference between redemption value and carrying value net of original deferred issuance costs.reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.

 

OnSubsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 3, 2016,9, 2018, we paid off the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share of its common stock to be paid December 15, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 15, 2016.

On October 3, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.4921875 per share to be paid December 15, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 15, 2016.

On October 3, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend for the period September 13, 2016 through November 30, 2016, of $0.3317708 per share to be paid December 15, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 15, 2016.

margin loan.

 

 137141 

 

NOTE 18 – SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

 

The following is the Unaudited Selected Quarterly Financial Data:

 

SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

THREE MONTHS ENDED

 

         
FISCAL 2016 12/31/15 3/31/16 6/30/16 9/30/16 
         
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $22,259,362  $22,966,838  $24,113,999  $25,575,911 
Total Expenses  11,167,093   12,537,914   11,835,546   13,942,992 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,153,614)  (3,296,977)  (4,047,158)  (1,440,309)
Net Income  6,938,655   7,131,947   8,231,295   10,192,610 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  4,786,897   4,980,189   6,079,537   4,685,265 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.08  $0.08  $0.09  $0.07 
                
FISCAL 2015  12/31/14  3/31/15  6/30/15  9/30/15 
FISCAL 2018 12/31/17 3/31/18 6/30/18 9/30/18 
                         
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $17,677,530  $18,858,596  $20,672,282  $20,567,089  $32,741,822  $33,621,508  $36,197,825  $36,600,694 
Lease Termination Income  238,625   -0-   -0-   -0-   210,261   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total Expenses  9,582,908   10,305,673   11,351,102   10,875,080   16,267,991   16,920,664   19,073,092   19,471,976 
Other Income (Expense)  (2,909,595)  (3,734,243)  (4,145,322)  (4,525,626)  (4,441,577)  (5,055,841)  (4,651,340)  (4,969,095)
Income from Continuing Operations  12,242,515   11,645,003   12,473,393   12,159,623 
Income from Continuing Operations per diluted share $0.16  $0.15  $0.16  $0.15 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  -0-   -0-   -0-   5,021,242   5,387,886   -0-   2,097,380   -0- 
Net Income  5,423,652   4,818,680   5,175,858   10,187,625   17,630,401   11,645,003   14,570,773   12,159,623 
Net Income per diluted share $0.23  $0.15  $0.18  $0.15 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  3,271,894   2,666,922   3,024,100   8,035,867   13,313,455   7,396,784   10,322,744   7,782,361 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.06  $0.04  $0.05  $0.14  $0.17  $0.10  $0.13  $0.10 
                
FISCAL 2017  12/31/16   3/31/17   6/30/17   9/30/17 
                
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $27,891,442  $28,018,022  $29,318,927  $31,156,914 
Total Expenses  13,972,561   14,495,329   14,840,339   16,294,148 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,064,960)  (5,098,082)  (2,748,225)  (4,600,576)
Income from Continuing Operations  9,853,921   8,424,611   11,730,363   10,262,190 
Income from Continuing Operations per diluted share $0.14  $0.12  $0.16  $0.14 
Net Income  9,853,921   8,424,611   11,730,363   10,262,190 
Net Income per diluted share $0.14  $0.12  $0.16  $0.14 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  6,156,161   4,842,575   5,217,411   6,726,087 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.09  $0.07  $0.07  $0.09 

 

Certain amounts in the Selected Quarterly Financial Data for the prior quarters have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation for the current year.

 138142 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20162018

 

Column A Column B Column C Column D  Column B Column C Column D 
       Capitalization        Capitalization 
     Buildings and Subsequent to      Buildings and Subsequent to 
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition  Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition 
                  
Industrial Buildings                                
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $-0-  $401,716  $878,081  $6,526,426  $-0-  $401,716  $878,081  $6,630,869 
Orangeburg (New York), NY  -0-   694,720   2,977,372   223,583 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  -0-   218,000   1,233,500   407,091   -0-   218,000   1,233,500   433,754 
Urbandale (Des Moines),IA  -0-   310,000   1,758,000   93,895 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  -0-   310,000   1,758,000   455,644 
Richland (Jackson), MS  -0-   211,000   1,195,000   494,691   -0-   211,000   1,195,000   494,691 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  -0-   264,000   3,302,000   679,913   -0-   264,000   3,302,000   679,913 
Fayetteville, NC  -0-   172,000   4,467,885   801,991   -0-   172,000   4,467,885   811,744 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  -0-   1,039,800   3,694,320   247,294   -0-   1,039,800   3,694,320   443,820 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  -0-   270,000   1,236,599   186,302   -0-   270,000   1,236,599   186,302 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  -0-   531,000   3,653,883   415,649   -0-   531,000   3,653,883   547,788 
Liberty, (Kansas City), MO  -0-   723,000   6,498,324   176,557 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  -0-   723,000   6,498,324   176,557 
Omaha, NE  -0-   1,170,000   4,425,500   349,191   -0-   1,170,000   4,425,500   349,191 
Charlottesville, VA  -0-   1,170,000   2,845,000   333,499   -0-   1,170,000   2,845,000   440,702 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  1,384,194   1,165,000   4,668,080   413,324   -0-   1,165,000   4,668,080   563,878 
West Chester Twp (Cincinnati), OH  2,071,107   695,000   3,342,000   1,691,690 
Richmond, VA (FDX)  -0-   1,160,000   6,413,305   184,876 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   695,000   3,342,000   1,696,686 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  -0-   1,160,000   6,413,305   219,090 
St. Joseph, MO  -0-   800,000   11,753,964   679,742   -0-   800,000   11,753,964   809,684 
Newington (Hartford), CT  -0-   410,000   2,961,000   92,824   -0-   410,000   2,961,000   123,108 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  -0-   980,000   5,050,997   3,351,364   -0-   980,000   5,050,997   3,735,364 
Beltsville (Washington DC), MD  -0-   3,200,000   5,958,773   5,353,582 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  -0-   3,200,000   5,958,773   5,353,582 
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  1,580,181   1,194,000   3,645,501   102,901 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  -0-   340,000   12,046,675   156,139   -0-   340,000   12,046,675   311,173 
Winston-Salem, NC  -0-   980,000   5,610,000   648,613   -0-   980,000   5,610,000   656,326 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  349,658   1,280,000   5,529,488   123,428   -0-   1,280,000   5,529,488   167,954 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  -0-   4,796,765   3,883,971   2,280,087 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  5,299,383   1,316,075   13,329,000   2,179,151   3,719,709   1,316,075   13,329,000   2,179,151 
Ft. Myers, FL  -0-   1,910,000   2,499,093   608,354 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle)  397,513   1,185,000   5,815,148   225,253 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle Tire)  -0-   1,185,000   5,815,148   232,838 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  -0-   5,112,120   9,186,606   4,683,748 
Richmond, VA  -0-   446,000   3,910,500   411,809 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  6,633,049   5,000,000   12,660,003   2,036,099   5,144,319   5,000,000   12,660,003   2,041,572 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  -0-   2,000,000   9,225,683   77,634 
Denver, CO  1,059,646   1,150,000   3,890,300   1,313,751   414,049   1,150,000   3,890,300   1,313,751 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  5,605,514   1,129,000   11,831,321   380,271   -0-   1,129,000   11,831,321   449,781 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  1,064,185   930,000   3,426,362   3,258,291   465,749   930,000   3,426,362   3,258,291 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  774,093   614,406   3,026,409   1,713,219   338,789   614,406   3,026,409   1,722,490 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  -0-   1,867,000   3,684,794   126,188 
Huntsville, AL  795,594   748,115   2,724,418   3,132,598   370,903   748,115   2,724,418   3,189,278 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  3,078,731   2,676,848   7,197,945   6,560,685 
Colorado Springs, CO  1,329,709   1,270,000   3,821,000   2,113,472 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  3,900,447   2,830,000   4,704,531   58,330 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  -0-   760,000   13,692,115   416,742 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP)  2,519,243   1,853,000   4,817,298   735,149 
Orion, MI  8,580,058   4,649,971   13,053,289   5,182,376 
Carlstadt, NJ (New York, NY)  1,898,198   1,194,000   3,645,501   64,088 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  -0-   5,112,120   9,186,606   4,238,926 
White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul), MN  -0-   1,393,000   3,764,126   -0- 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo),NY  343,548   4,796,765   3,883,971   2,280,087 
Richmond, VA (Carrier)  -0-   446,000   3,910,500   411,809 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  -0-   2,000,000   9,225,683   72,684 
Tampa, FL (TB Grand Prix)  -0-   1,867,000   3,684,794   126,188 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  -0-   380,000   1,400,943   190,789   -0-   380,000   1,400,943   196,836 
Lakeland, FL  -0-   261,000   1,621,163   100,369   -0-   261,000   1,621,163   161,063 
El Paso, TX  3,259,726   3,225,195   4,514,427   4,691,570   -0-   3,225,195   4,514,427   4,691,570 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  -0-   2,676,848   7,197,945   6,572,385 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  -0-   2,830,000   4,704,531   322,589 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  -0-   760,000   13,692,115   481,568 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  -0-   1,853,000   4,817,298   793,374 
Orion, MI  -0-   4,649,971   13,053,289   5,186,864 
Chattanooga, TN  1,551,081   300,000   4,464,711   247,492   -0-   300,000   4,464,711   373,829 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  2,685,791   990,000   4,893,912   979,967   -0-   990,000   4,893,912   1,035,924 
Kansas City, MO (Kellogg)  2,241,680   660,000   4,049,832   90,642 
Punta Gorda, FL  1,990,764   -0-   4,104,915   8,350   -0-   -0-   4,104,915   28,595 
Cocoa, FL  5,063,864   1,881,316   8,623,564   3,622,569   -0-   1,881,316   8,623,564   3,622,569 
Orlando, FL  -0-   2,200,000   6,133,800   440,724 
Topeka, KS  860,364   -0-   3,679,843   -0- 
Memphis, TN  5,061,376   1,234,987   13,380,000   -0- 
Houston, TX  2,148,201   1,661,120   6,320,000   182,158 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  6,455,552   1,500,000   16,240,000   79,203 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  724,766   1,746,822   10,045,000   5,282,214 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  7,217,469   2,230,000   11,985,126   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  -0-   1,100,000   4,440,000   11,227 
Edinburg, TX  -0-   1,000,000   6,414,000   4,625,014 

 

 139143 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20162018

 

Column A Column B Column C Column D  Column B Column C Column D 
       Capitalization        Capitalization 
     Buildings and Subsequent to      Buildings and Subsequent to 
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition  Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition 
                  
Orlando, FL $4,342,604  $2,200,000  $6,133,800  $220,632 
Topeka, KS  1,363,023   -0-   3,679,843   -0- 
Memphis, TN  6,667,886   1,240,887   13,380,000   -0- 
Houston, TX  3,124,904   1,730,000   6,320,000   33,107 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  7,960,781   1,500,000   16,240,000   29,106 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  1,926,986   1,670,000   10,045,000   3,698,307 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  7,659,116   2,230,000   11,985,126   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams)  -0-   1,100,000   4,440,000   11,227 
Edinburg, TX  -0-   1,000,000   6,414,000   4,009,872 
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH  10,446,469   1,760,000   17,840,000   -0-  $9,300,481  $1,760,000 $17,840,000 $-0- 
Corpus Christi, TX  -0-   -0-   4,764,500   -0-   -0-   -0-   4,764,500   43,830 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  3,786,098   1,190,000   4,335,600   -0-   -0-   1,190,000   4,335,600   -0- 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  2,592,182   240,000   4,176,000   36,425   -0-   240,000   4,176,000   36,425 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Anda)  8,750,368   800,000   13,750,000   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK  4,401,832   1,410,000   8,043,000   3,127,262 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda)  7,564,186   800,000   13,750,000   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  3,416,097   1,410,000   8,043,000   3,131,462 
Waco, TX  4,799,919   1,350,000   7,383,000   3,813,157   4,234,777   1,350,000   7,383,000   3,818,368 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  7,503,400   320,000   13,380,000   62,030   6,294,503   320,000   13,380,000   62,030 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool)  25,000,000   2,550,000   24,818,816   9,546,101 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  21,722,567   2,550,000   24,818,816   9,546,101 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  5,321,390   1,740,000   8,460,000   -0-   4,395,246   1,740,000   8,460,000   -0- 
Green Bay, WI  3,260,401   590,000   5,980,000   -0-   2,640,432   590,000   5,980,000   -0- 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  2,612,978   900,000   4,320,000   -0-   2,115,962   900,000   4,320,000   -0- 
Tulsa, OK  1,934,175   790,000   2,910,000   48,031   1,685,288   790,000   2,910,000   48,031 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  16,694,846   2,280,000   24,353,125   134,727   15,305,669   2,280,000   24,353,125   174,727 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  10,648,115   2,750,000   15,335,492   208,616   9,189,343   2,750,000   15,335,492   208,616 
Altoona, PA  4,017,147   1,200,000   7,790,000   18,650   3,253,281   1,200,000   7,790,000   32,966 
Spring (Houston), TX  9,126,834   1,890,000   13,391,318   4,002,480   7,924,865   1,890,000   13,391,318   4,013,078 
Indianapolis, IN (FDX Ground)  12,289,676   3,500,000   20,446,000   -0- 
Indianapolis, IN  10,437,151   3,745,572   20,446,000   1,312,510 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  9,701,419   1,890,000   13,310,000   4,950   8,563,797   1,890,000   13,310,000   4,950 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  6,378,382   540,000   9,390,000   -0-   5,638,258   540,000   9,390,000   35,550 
Kansas City, MO (Bunzl)  6,958,091   1,000,000   8,600,000   -0- 
Kansas City, MO  6,633,001   1,000,000   8,600,000   380,250 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  18,352,289   1,850,000   26,150,000   -0-   16,639,132   1,850,000   26,150,000   -0- 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  18,453,112   6,000,000   24,645,954   -0-   16,243,754   6,000,000   24,645,954   89,748 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  8,071,987   1,800,000   11,137,000   -0-   7,126,384   1,800,000   11,137,000   4,587,760 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  22,760,488   2,250,000   35,234,574   15,817   20,159,025   2,250,000   35,234,574   27,497 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  23,431,093   8,200,000   27,100,832   -0-   20,753,864   8,200,000   27,100,832   -0- 
Cincinnati, OH  -0-   800,000   5,950,000   -0-   -0-   800,000   5,950,000   -0- 
Rockford, IL (B/E Aerospace)  -0-   480,000   4,620,000   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  -0-   480,000   4,620,000   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  20,001,944   4,305,000   27,670,897   -0-   17,813,451   4,305,000   27,670,897   1,068,900 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  12,468,713   2,720,000   15,690,000   -0-   11,133,990   2,720,000   15,690,000   -0- 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  12,700,739   3,700,000   16,250,000   -0-   11,199,661   3,700,000   16,250,000   -0- 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  19,881,817   8,000,000   22,210,680   -0-   17,757,364   8,000,000   22,210,680   17,867 
Colorado Springs, CO  18,576,282   2,150,000   26,350,000   -0-   16,651,710   2,150,000   26,350,000   820,066 
Louisville, KY  7,288,891   1,590,000   9,714,000   -0-   6,525,135   1,590,000   9,714,000   -0- 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  26,400,000   7,060,000   30,720,000   -0-   23,702,918   7,060,000   30,720,000   -0- 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  22,215,000   2,350,000   29,387,000   -0-   19,956,867   2,350,000   29,387,000   -0- 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  21,328,714   1,700,000   33,150,000   -0- 
Ft. Myers, FL  13,280,803   2,486,417   18,400,000   777,218 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  19,468,554   4,034,363   27,620,623   -0- 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  30,928,224   6,247,658   43,632,835   -0- 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  14,471,117   1,362,458   19,677,937   -0- 
Homestead (Miami), FL  23,313,676   4,426,727   33,446,393   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  5,537,962   844,688   7,883,751   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  24,863,355   4,306,684   35,736,461   -0- 
Kenton, OH  11,473,387   854,780   17,026,827   -0- 
Stow, OH  12,130,343   1,429,715   17,504,350   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  13,683,131   4,639,283   16,847,923   32,205 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  19,013,593   1,618,240   28,260,702   -0- 
Savannah, GA  32,215,696   4,404,988   51,620,957   -0- 
Daytona Beach, FL  19,187,819   3,119,640   26,853,559   -0- 
Mobile, AL  18,832,395   2,480,474   30,571,842   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  29,860,000   7,103,106   39,473,274   -0- 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  39,700,000   13,964,652   46,262,482   -0- 
Shopping Center                                
Somerset, NJ  -0-   34,316   637,097   2,401,468   -0-   34,317   637,097   2,440,363 
Vacant Land                                
Shelby County, TN  -0-   11,065   -0-   -0-   -0-   11,065   -0-   -0- 
 $483,748,153  $165,375,315  $903,845,280  $102,092,900  $719,768,355  $224,719,083  $1,380,703,773  $114,155,563 

 

 140144 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20162018

Column A Column E (1) (2)  Column E (1) (2) 
 Gross Amount at Which Carried  Gross Amount at Which Carried 
 September 30, 2016  September 30, 2018 
Description Land Bldg & Imp Total  Land Bldg & Imp Total 
              
Industrial Buildings                        
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $401,716  $7,404,507  $7,806,223  $401,716  $7,508,950  $7,910,666 
Orangeburg (New York), NY  694,720   3,200,955   3,895,675 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  218,000   1,640,591   1,858,591   218,000   1,667,254   1,885,254 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  310,000   1,851,895   2,161,895   310,000   2,213,644   2,523,644 
Richland (Jackson), MS  211,000   1,689,691   1,900,691   211,000   1,689,691   1,900,691 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  264,000   3,981,913   4,245,913   264,000   3,981,913   4,245,913 
Fayetteville, NC  172,000   5,269,876   5,441,876   172,000   5,279,629   5,451,629 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  1,039,800   3,941,614   4,981,414   1,039,800   4,138,140   5,177,940 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  270,000   1,422,901   1,692,901   270,000   1,422,901   1,692,901 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  531,000   4,069,532   4,600,532   531,000   4,201,671   4,732,671 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  723,000   6,674,881   7,397,881   723,000   6,674,881   7,397,881 
Omaha, NE  1,170,000   4,774,691   5,944,691   1,170,000   4,774,691   5,944,691 
Charlottesville, VA  1,170,000   3,178,499   4,348,499   1,170,000   3,285,702   4,455,702 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  1,165,000   5,081,404   6,246,404   1,165,000   5,231,958   6,396,958 
West Chester Twp (Cincinnati), OH  695,000   5,033,690   5,728,690 
Richmond, VA (FDX)  1,160,000   6,598,181   7,758,181 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  695,000   5,038,686   5,733,686 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  1,160,000   6,632,395   7,792,395 
St. Joseph, MO  800,000   12,433,706   13,233,706   800,000   12,563,648   13,363,648 
Newington (Hartford), CT  410,000   3,053,824   3,463,824   410,000   3,084,108   3,494,108 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  980,000   8,402,361   9,382,361   980,000   8,786,361   9,766,361 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  3,200,000   11,312,355   14,512,355   3,200,000   11,312,355   14,512,355 
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  1,194,000   3,748,402   4,942,402 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  340,000   12,202,814   12,542,814   340,000   12,357,848   12,697,848 
Winston-Salem, NC  980,000   6,258,613   7,238,613   980,000   6,266,326   7,246,326 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  1,280,000   5,652,916   6,932,916   1,280,000   5,697,442   6,977,442 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  4,796,765   6,164,058   10,960,823 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  1,316,075   15,508,151   16,824,226   1,316,075   15,508,151   16,824,226 
Ft. Myers, FL  1,910,000   3,107,447   5,017,447 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle)  1,185,000   6,040,401   7,225,401 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle Tire)  1,185,000   6,047,986   7,232,986 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  5,112,120   13,870,354   18,982,474 
Richmond, VA  446,000   4,322,309   4,768,309 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  5,000,000   14,696,102   19,696,102   5,000,000   14,701,575   19,701,575 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  2,000,000   9,303,317   11,303,317 
Denver, CO  1,150,000   5,204,051   6,354,051   1,150,000   5,204,051   6,354,051 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  1,129,000   12,211,592   13,340,592   1,129,000   12,281,102   13,410,102 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  930,000   6,684,653   7,614,653   930,000   6,684,653   7,614,653 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  614,406   4,739,628   5,354,034   614,406   4,748,899   5,363,305 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  1,867,000   3,810,982   5,677,982 
Huntsville, AL  748,115   5,857,016   6,605,131   748,115   5,913,696   6,661,811 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  2,676,848   13,758,630   16,435,478 
Colorado Springs, CO  1,270,000   5,934,472   7,204,472 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  2,830,000   4,762,861   7,592,861 
Griffin (Atlanta) , GA  760,000   14,108,857   14,868,857 
Roanoke, VA (DHL)  1,853,000   5,552,447   7,405,447 
Orion, MI  4,649,971   18,235,665   22,885,636 
Carlstadt, NJ (New York, NY)  1,194,000   3,709,589   4,903,589 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  5,112,120   13,425,532   18,537,652 
White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul), MN  1,393,000   3,764,126   5,157,126 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  4,796,765   6,164,058   10,960,823 
Richmond, VA (Carrier)  446,000   4,322,309   4,768,309 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  2,000,000   9,298,367   11,298,367 
Tampa, FL (TB Grand Prix)  1,867,000   3,810,982   5,677,982 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  380,000   1,591,732   1,971,732   380,000   1,597,779   1,977,779 
Lakeland, FL  261,000   1,721,532   1,982,532   261,000   1,782,226   2,043,226 
El Paso, TX  3,225,195   9,205,997   12,431,192   3,225,195   9,205,997   12,431,192 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  2,676,848   13,770,330   16,447,178 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  2,830,000   5,027,120   7,857,120 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  760,000   14,173,683   14,933,683 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  1,853,000   5,610,672   7,463,672 
Orion, MI  4,649,971   18,240,153   22,890,124 
Chattanooga, TN  300,000   4,712,203   5,012,203   300,000   4,838,540   5,138,540 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  990,000   5,873,879   6,863,879   990,000   5,929,836   6,919,836 
Kansas City, MO  660,000   4,140,474   4,800,474 
Punta Gorda, FL  -0-   4,113,265   4,113,265   -0-   4,133,510   4,133,510 
Cocoa, FL  1,881,316   12,246,133   14,127,449   1,881,316   12,246,133   14,127,449 
Orlando, FL  2,200,000   6,354,432   8,554,432   2,200,000   6,574,524   8,774,524 
Topeka, KS  -0-   3,679,843   3,679,843 
Memphis, TN  1,234,987   13,380,000   14,614,987 
Houston, TX  1,661,120   6,502,158   8,163,278 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  1,500,000   16,319,203   17,819,203 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  1,746,822   15,327,214   17,074,036 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  2,230,000   11,985,126   14,215,126 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  1,100,000   4,451,227   5,551,227 
Edinburg, TX  1,000,000   11,039,014   12,039,014 

 

 141145 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20162018

 

Column A Column E (1) (2)  Column E (1) (2) 
 Gross Amount at Which Carried  Gross Amount at Which Carried 
 September 30, 2016  September 30, 2018 
Description Land Bldg & Imp Total  Land Bldg & Imp Total 
              
Topeka, KS $-0-  $3,679,843  $3,679,843 
Memphis, TN  1,240,887   13,380,000   14,620,887 
Houston, TX  1,730,000   6,353,107   8,083,107 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  1,500,000   16,269,106   17,769,106 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  1,670,000   13,743,307   15,413,307 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  2,230,000   11,985,126   14,215,126 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams)  1,100,000   4,451,227   5,551,227 
Edinburg, TX  1,000,000   10,423,872   11,423,872 
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH  1,760,000   17,840,000   19,600,000  $1,760,000  $17,840,000  $19,600,000 
Corpus Christi, TX  -0-   4,764,500   4,764,500   -0-   4,808,330   4,808,330 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  1,190,000   4,335,600   5,525,600   1,190,000   4,335,600   5,525,600 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  240,000   4,212,425   4,452,425   240,000   4,212,425   4,452,425 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Anda)  800,000   13,750,000   14,550,000 
Oklahoma City, OK  1,410,000   11,170,262   12,580,262 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals Inc.)  800,000   13,750,000   14,550,000 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  1,410,000   11,174,462   12,584,462 
Waco, TX  1,350,000   11,196,157   12,546,157   1,350,000   11,201,368   12,551,368 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  320,000   13,442,030   13,762,030   320,000   13,442,030   13,762,030 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool)  2,550,000   34,364,917   36,914,917 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  2,550,000   34,364,917   36,914,917 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  1,740,000   8,460,000   10,200,000   1,740,000   8,460,000   10,200,000 
Green Bay, WI  590,000   5,980,000   6,570,000   590,000   5,980,000   6,570,000 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  900,000   4,320,000   5,220,000   900,000   4,320,000   5,220,000 
Tulsa, OK  790,000   2,958,031   3,748,031   790,000   2,958,031   3,748,031 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  2,280,000   24,487,852   26,767,852   2,280,000   24,527,852   26,807,852 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  2,750,000   15,544,108   18,294,108   2,750,000   15,544,108   18,294,108 
Altoona, PA  1,200,000   7,808,650   9,008,650   1,200,000   7,822,966   9,022,966 
Spring (Houston), TX  1,890,000   17,393,798   19,283,798   1,890,000   17,404,396   19,294,396 
Indianapolis, IN (FDX Ground)  3,500,000   20,446,000   23,946,000 
Indianapolis, IN  3,745,572   21,758,510   25,504,082 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  1,890,000   13,314,950   15,204,950   1,890,000   13,314,950   15,204,950 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  540,000   9,390,000   9,930,000   540,000   9,425,550   9,965,550 
Kansas City, MO (Bunzl)  1,000,000   8,600,000   9,600,000 
Kansas City, MO  1,000,000   8,980,250   9,980,250 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  1,850,000   26,150,000   28,000,000   1,850,000   26,150,000   28,000,000 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  6,000,000   24,645,954   30,645,954   6,000,000   24,735,702   30,735,702 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  1,800,000   11,137,000   12,937,000   1,800,000   15,724,760   17,524,760 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  2,250,000   35,250,391   37,500,391   2,250,000   35,262,071   37,512,071 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  8,200,000   27,100,832   35,300,832   8,200,000   27,100,832   35,300,832 
Cincinnati, OH  800,000   5,950,000   6,750,000   800,000   5,950,000   6,750,000 
Rockford, IL (B/E Aerospace)  480,000   4,620,000   5,100,000 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  480,000   4,620,000   5,100,000 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  4,305,000   27,670,897   31,975,897   4,305,000   28,739,797   33,044,797 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  2,720,000   15,690,000   18,410,000   2,720,000   15,690,000   18,410,000 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  3,700,000   16,250,000   19,950,000   3,700,000   16,250,000   19,950,000 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  8,000,000   22,210,680   30,210,680   8,000,000   22,228,547   30,228,547 
Colorado Springs, CO  2,150,000   26,350,000   28,500,000   2,150,000   27,170,066   29,320,066 
Louisville, KY  1,590,000   9,714,000   11,304,000   1,590,000   9,714,000   11,304,000 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  7,060,000   30,720,000   37,780,000   7,060,000   30,720,000   37,780,000 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  2,350,000   29,387,000   31,737,000   2,350,000   29,387,000   31,737,000 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  1,700,000   33,150,000   34,850,000 
Ft. Myers, FL  2,486,417   19,177,218   21,663,635 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  4,034,363   27,620,623   31,654,986 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  6,247,658   43,632,835   49,880,493 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  1,362,458   19,677,937   21,040,395 
Homestead (Miami), FL  4,426,727   33,446,393   37,873,120 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  844,688   7,883,751   8,728,439 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  4,306,684   35,736,461   40,043,145 
Kenton, OH  854,780   17,026,827   17,881,607 
Stow, OH  1,429,715   17,504,350   18,934,065 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  4,639,283   16,880,128   21,519,411 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  1,618,240   28,260,702   29,878,942 
Savannah, GA  4,404,988   51,620,957   56,025,945 
Daytona Beach, FL  3,119,640   26,853,559   29,973,199 
Mobile, AL  2,480,474   30,571,842   33,052,316 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  7,103,106   39,473,274   46,576,380 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  13,964,652   46,262,482   60,227,134 
Shopping Center                        
Somerset, NJ  34,316   3,038,565   3,072,881   34,317   3,077,460   3,111,777 
Vacant Land                        
Shelby County, TN  11,065   -0-   11,065   11,065   -0-   11,065 
 $165,375,315  $1,005,938,180  $1,171,313,495  $224,719,083  $1,494,859,336  $1,719,578,419 

 

(1)See pages 145-147152-154 for reconciliation.
(2)The aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes approximates historical cost.

 

 142

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
Industrial Buildings                
 Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $2,331,288   1977   1977   5-31.5 
 Orangeburg (New York), NY  2,319,253   1990   1993   31.5 
 Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  1,177,386   1988   1993   39 
 Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  1,094,293   1985   1994   39 
 Richland (Jackson), MS  826,199   1986   1994   39 
 O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  2,096,073   1989   1994   39 
 Fayetteville, NC  2,458,876   1996   1997   39 
 Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  2,037,309   1997   1997   39 
 Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  656,159   1997   1997   39 
 Romulus (Detroit), MI  1,804,248   1998   1998   39 
 Liberty (Kansas City), MO  3,152,489   1997   1998   39 
 Omaha, NE  2,109,230   1999   1999   39 
 Charlottesville, VA  1,393,226   1998   1999   39 
 Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  2,295,680   1998   1999   39 
 West Chester Twp (Cincinnati), OH  1,947,128   1999   2000   39 
 Richmond, VA (FDX)  2,644,156   2000   2001   39 
 St. Joseph, MO  4,756,910   2000   2001   39 
 Newington (Hartford), CT  1,207,938   2001   2001   39 
 Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  2,853,810   2001   2001   39 
 Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  3,536,076   2000   2001   39 
 Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  4,485,359   2001   2001   39 
 Winston-Salem, NC  2,185,430   2001   2002   39 
 Elgin (Chicago), IL  2,124,899   2002   2002   39 
 Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  5,115,610   2002   2002   39 
 Ft. Myers, FL  991,678   1974   2002   39 
 Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle)  2,158,091   2002   2003   39 
 Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  4,161,734   2004   2004   39 
 Denver, CO  1,437,516   2005   2005   39 
 Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  3,577,226   2002   2005   39 
 Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  1,724,191   2005   2005   39 
 Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  1,258,944   2005   2005   39 
 Huntsville, AL  936,862   2005   2005   39 
 Richfield (Cleveland), OH  2,373,693   2006   2006   39 
 Colorado Springs, CO  1,490,351   2006   2006   39 
 Tampa, FL (FDX)  1,258,519   2006   2006   39 
 Griffin (Atlanta), GA  3,767,103   2006   2006   39 
 Roanoke, VA (CHEP)  1,329,033   1996   2007   39 
 Orion, MI  3,549,648   2007   2007   39 
 Carlstadt, NJ (New York, NY)  849,584   1977   2007   39 
 Wheeling (Chicago), IL  3,735,969   2003   2007   39 
 White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul), MN  927,965   2001   2007   39 
 Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  1,531,509   2002   2007   39 
 Richmond, VA (Carrier)  1,229,737   2004   2007   39 
 Montgomery (Chicago), IL  2,282,887   2004   2007   39 
 Tampa, FL (TB Grand Prix)  941,848   1989   2007   39 
 Augusta, GA (FDX)  367,357   1993   2007   39 
 Lakeland, FL  466,240   1993   2007   39 
 El Paso, TX  1,442,146   2005   2007   39 
 Chattanooga, TN  1,131,706   2002   2007   39 
 Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  1,521,396   1998   2007   39 

143

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
 Kansas City, MO (Kellogg) $1,022,653   2002   2007   39 
 Punta Gorda, FL  833,789   2007   2007   39 
 Cocoa, FL  2,113,243   2006   2008   39 
 Orlando, FL  1,471,814   1997   2008   39 
 Topeka, KS 707,765   2006   2009   39 
 Memphis, TN  2,230,008   1994   2010  ��39 
 Houston, TX  1,080,294   2005   2010   39 
 Carrollton (Dallas), TX  2,708,020   2009   2010   39 
 Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  1,949,873   2009   2010   39 
 Lebanon (Nashville), TN  1,536,542   1993   2011   39 
 Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams)  628,612   1998-2008   2011   39 
 Edinburg, TX  907,803   2011   2011   39 
 Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH  2,058,462   2012   2012   39 
 Corpus Christi, TX  549,750   2012   2012   39 
 Halfmoon (Albany), NY  500,262   2012   2012   39 
 Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  485,114   2012   2012   39 
 Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Anda)  1,498,397   2012   2012   39 
 Oklahoma City, OK  1,014,638   2012   2012   39 
 Waco, TX  923,263   2012   2012   39 
 Livonia (Detroit), MI  1,350,345   1999   2013   39 
 Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool)  2,275,368   2013   2013   39 
 Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  714,038   2013   2013   39 
 Green Bay, WI  460,000   2013   2013   39 
 Stewartville (Rochester), MN  332,308   2013   2013   39 
 Tulsa, OK  227,268   2009   2014   39 
 Buckner (Louisville), KY  1,834,166   2014   2014   39 
 Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  1,172,549   2014   2014   39 
 Altoona, PA  583,052   2014   2014   39 
 Spring (Houston), TX  1,183,663   2014   2014   39 
 Indianapolis, IN (FDX Ground)  1,132,868   2014   2014   39 
 Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  682,605   2015   2015   39 
 Lindale (Tyler), TX  481,538   2015   2015   39 
 Kansas City, MO (Bunzl)  422,650   2015   2015   39 
 Frankfort (Lexington), KY  1,229,274   2015   2015   39 
 Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  1,053,246   2015   2015   39 
 Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  452,143   2015   2015   39 
 Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  1,280,020   2015   2015   39 
 Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  810,709   2015   2015   39 
 Cincinnati, OH  165,278   2014   2015   39 
 Rockford, IL (B/E Aerospace)  236,923   2012   2015   39 
 Concord (Charlotte), NC  650,384   2016   2016   39 
 Covington (New Orleans), LA  335,256   2016   2016   39 
 Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  243,056   2016   2016   39 
 Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  284,752   2016   2016   39 
 Colorado Springs, CO  225,214   2016   2016   39 
 Louisville, KY  83,026   2016   2016   39 
 Davenport (Orlando), FL  131,282   2016   2016   39 
 Olathe (Kansas City), KS  125,585   2016   2016   39 
Shopping Center                
 Somerset, NJ  1,399,343   1970   1970   10-33 
Vacant Land                
 Shelby County, TN  -0-   N/A   2007   N/A 
  $148,830,169             

144

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

(1) Reconciliation

REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

  9/30/2016  9/30/2015  9/30/2014 
          
Balance-Beginning of Year $941,009,905  $743,714,774  $627,866,051 
Additions:            
 Acquisitions  209,867,577   190,948,360   96,433,935 
 Improvements  20,436,013   11,903,148   19,414,788 
Total Additions  230,303,590   202,851,508   115,848,723 
Deletions:            
 Sales  -0-   (5,556,377)  -0- 
Total Deletions  -0-   (5,556,377)  -0- 
             
Balance-End of Year $1,171,313,495  $941,009,905  $743,714,774 

ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

  9/30/2016  9/30/2015  9/30/2014 
          
Balance-Beginning of Year $124,898,639  $107,004,184  $91,095,415 
 Depreciation  23,931,530   19,625,748   15,908,769 
 Sales  -0-   (1,731,293)  -0- 
             
Balance-End of Year $148,830,169  $124,898,639  $107,004,184 

145

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III

SEPTEMBER 30,

(1)Reconciliation

  2016  2015  2014 
Balance – Beginning of Year $941,009,905  $743,714,774  $627,866,051 
Additions:            
Somerset, NJ  377,637   182,573   1,136,454 
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA  37,255   1,907,292   2,707,529 
Orangeburg (New York), NY  -0-   96,800   108,157 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  7,797   -0-   -0- 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Richland (Jackson), MS  -0-   -0-   422,691 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  -0-   317,457   20,744 
Fayetteville, NC  557,354   13,773   -0- 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  13,775   -0-   -0- 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  8,700   -0-   65,333 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  -0-   116,919   -0- 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  24,263   2,500   26,620 
Omaha, NE  7,410   7,391   -0- 
Charlottesville, VA  4,462   -0-   -0- 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  16,983   -0- �� 73,921 
West Chester Twp (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   -0-   77,555 
Richmond, VA (FDX)  18,510   7,356   14,152 
St. Joseph, MO  50,934   53,922   11,980 
Newington (Hartford), CT  -0-   -0-   18,000 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  8,689   -0-   -0- 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  44,600   9,271   71,700 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  156,139   -0-   -0- 
Monroe, NC  -0-   55,680   10,875 
Winston Salem, NC  316,527   -0-   8,101 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  5,960   30,312   29,048 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  1,655,640   (3,925)  13,015 
Ft. Myers, FL  -0-   -0-   13,321 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle)  -0-   -0-   200,000 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground) (A)  1,247,140   6,147   688,990 
Denver, CO  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  40,000   328,118   -0- 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  -0-   -0-   7,983 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  25,161   -0-   -0- 
Huntsville, AL (B)  1,853,390   -0-   -0- 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  -0-   (91,709)  4,655,309 
Colorado Springs, CO  9,357   -0-   -0- 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  27,144   -0-   -0- 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP)  -0-   (59,348)  649,101 
Orion, MI  5,867   5,021   61,507 
Carlstadt, NJ (New York, NY)  13,877   51,120   -0- 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  -0-   -0-   -0- 
White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul), MN  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  -0-   -0-   28,766 
Richmond, VA (Carrier)  7,540   19,764   29,964 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  26,916   -0-   34,192 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  24,700   6,850   13,250 
Lakeland, FL  16,321   -0-   6,643 
El Paso, TX  -0-   1,198,544   323,326 
Chattanooga, TN  41,042   -0-   -0- 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  84,288   4,450   58,309 
Kansas City, MO (Kellogg)  52,100   -0-   -0- 
Punta Gorda, FL  8,350   -0-   -0- 
Cocoa, FL  37,606   73,962   3,494,426 
Orlando, FL  13,195   -0-   4,833 
Topeka, KS  -0-   -0-   -0- 

146 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND SUBSIDIARIESACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III, (CONT’D)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

 

(1)Reconciliation (cont’d)

  2016  2015  2014 
Memphis, TN  -0-   -0-   20,887 
Houston, TX  -0-   2,279   -0- 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  24,806   4,300   -0- 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  -0-   -0-   338,833 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams)  -0-   11,227   -0- 
Edinburg, TX (C)  3,985,389   -0-   24,483 
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Corpus Christi, TX  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   36,425   -0- 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Anda)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (D)  (13,611)  2,989,708   -0- 
Waco, TX  -0-   3,813,157   -0- 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  31,497   30,533   -0- 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool) (E)  9,412,120   133,981   -0- 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Green Bay, WI  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Tulsa, OK  -0-   48,031   3,700,000 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  48,136   86,591   26,633,125 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  5,355   203,261   18,085,492 
Altoona, PA  18,650   -0-   8,990,000 
Spring (Houston), TX  56,275   1,415   19,226,108 
Indianapolis, IN (FDX Ground)  -0-   202,000   23,744,000 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  4,950   15,200,000   -0- 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  -0-   9,930,000   -0- 
Kansas City, MO (Bunzl)  -0-   9,600,000   -0- 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  -0-   28,000,000   -0- 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  -0-   30,645,954   -0- 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   12,937,000   -0- 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  15,817   37,484,574   -0- 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  -0-   35,300,832   -0- 
Cincinnati, OH  -0-   6,750,000   -0- 
Rockford, IL (B/E Aerospace)  -0-   5,100,000   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  31,975,897   -0-   -0- 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  18,410,000   -0-   -0- 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  19,950,000   -0-   -0- 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  30,210,680   -0-   -0- 
Colorado Springs, CO  28,500,000   -0-   -0- 
Louisville, KY  11,304,000   -0-   -0- 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  37,780,000   -0-   -0- 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  31,737,000   -0-   -0- 
Total Additions  230,303,590   202,851,508   115,848,723 
Total Disposals  -0-   (5,556,377)  -0- 
Balance – End of Year $1,171,313,495  $941,009,905  $743,714,774 

(A)Parking lot expansion completed in August 2016
(B)14,941 square foot building expansion was completed in August 2016
(C)50,741 square foot building expansion was completed in October 2016
(D)Reversal of over accrual from prior year contract payable on expansion completed in fiscal year 2015
(E)246,434 square foot building expansion was completed in July 2016
Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
Industrial Buildings                
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $2,957,471   1977   1977   (3)
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  1,313,173   1988   1993   (3)
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  1,211,364   1985   1994   (3)
Richland (Jackson), MS  982,066   1986   1994   (3)
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  2,361,768   1989   1994   (3)
Fayetteville, NC  2,931,202   1996   1997   (3)
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  2,283,345   1997   1997   (3)
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  741,290   1997   1997   (3)
Romulus (Detroit), MI  2,043,189   1998   1998   (3)
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  3,497,982   1997   1998   (3)
Omaha, NE  2,358,451   1999   1999   (3)
Charlottesville, VA  1,588,202   1998   1999   (3)
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  2,619,003   1998   1999   (3)
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  2,305,181   1999   2000   (3)
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  3,007,443   2000   2001   (3)
St. Joseph, MO  5,452,138   2000   2001   (3)
Newington (Hartford), CT  1,377,254   2001   2001   (3)
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  3,296,930   2001   2001   (3)
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  4,151,339   2000   2001   (3)
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  1,029,584   1977   2001   (3)
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  5,183,974   2001   2001   (3)
Winston-Salem, NC  2,617,877   2001   2002   (3)
Elgin (Chicago), IL  2,436,368   2002   2002   (3)
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  1,851,798   2000   2002   (3)
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  6,144,623   2002   2003   (3)
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle Tire)  2,538,608   2002   2003   (3)
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  4,430,770   2003   2003   (3)
Richmond, VA  1,545,670   2004   2004   (3)
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  4,921,899   2004   2004   (3)
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  2,761,952   2004   2004   (3)
Denver, CO  1,704,122   2005   2005   (3)
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  4,343,346   2002   2005   (3)
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  2,071,138   2005   2005   (3)
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  1,509,465   2005   2005   (3)
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  1,144,249   1989   2005   (3)
Huntsville, AL  1,249,093   2005   2005   (3)
Augusta, GA (FDX)  463,245   1993   2006   (3)
Lakeland, FL  573,621   1993   2006   (3)
El Paso, TX  1,977,282   2005   2006   (3)
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  3,083,114   2006   2006   (3)
Tampa, FL (FDX)  1,515,388   2006   2006   (3)
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  4,493,178   2006   2006   (3)
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  1,706,454   1996   2007   (3)
Orion, MI  4,488,942   2007   2007   (3)
Chattanooga, TN  1,388,863   2002   2007   (3)
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  1,893,515   1998   2007   (3)
Punta Gorda, FL  1,058,498   2007   2007   (3)
Cocoa, FL  2,758,147   2006   2008   (3)
Orlando, FL  1,830,818   1997   2008   (3)
Topeka, KS  896,483   2006   2009   (3)
Memphis, TN  2,916,162   1994   2010   (3)
Houston, TX  1,440,389   2005   2010   (3)
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  3,555,283   2009   2010   (3)
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  2,654,658   2009   2010   (3)
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  2,151,164   1993   2011   (3)
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  859,960   1998-2008   2011   (3)
Edinburg, TX  1,472,631   2011   2011   (3)

 

 147 

 

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH $2,973,333   2012   2012   (3)
Corpus Christi, TX  797,350   2012   2012   (3)
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  722,600   2012   2012   (3)
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  704,125   2012   2012   (3)
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals Inc.)  2,203,526   2012   2012   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  1,599,042   2012   2012   (3)
Waco, TX  1,498,728   2012   2012   (3)
Livonia (Detroit), MI  2,046,869   1999   2013   (3)
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  4,044,199   2013   2013   (3)
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  1,147,885   2013   2013   (3)
Green Bay, WI  766,667   2013   2013   (3)
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  553,846   2013   2013   (3)
Tulsa, OK  391,119   2009   2014   (3)
Buckner (Louisville), KY  3,114,323   2014   2014   (3)
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  2,001,778   2014   2014   (3)
Altoona, PA  986,269   2014   2014   (3)
Spring (Houston), TX  2,077,166   2014   2014   (3)
Indianapolis, IN  2,239,839   2014   2014   (3)
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  1,366,159   2015   2015   (3)
Lindale (Tyler), TX  966,498   2015   2015   (3)
Kansas City, MO  885,643   2015   2015   (3)
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  2,570,299   2015   2015   (3)
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  2,323,375   2015   2015   (3)
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  1,023,271   2015   2015   (3)
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  3,091,837   2015   2015   (3)
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  2,200,495   2015   2015   (3)
Cincinnati, OH  470,406   2014   2015   (3)
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  473,846   2012   2015   (3)
Concord (Charlotte), NC  2,314,361   2016   2016   (3)
Covington (New Orleans), LA  1,139,872   2016   2016   (3)
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  1,076,389   2016   2016   (3)
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  1,426,792   2016   2016   (3)
Colorado Springs, CO  1,593,580   2016   2016   (3)
Louisville, KY  581,179   2016   2016   (3)
Davenport (Orlando), FL  1,706,667   2016   2016   (3)
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  1,632,611   2016   2016   (3)
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  1,700,000   2017   2017   (3)
Ft. Myers, FL  842,928   2017   2017   (3)
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  1,062,332   2017   2017   (3)
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  1,398,488   2017   2017   (3)
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  630,703   2017   2017   (3)
Homestead (Miami), FL  1,072,000   2017   2017   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  252,684   2017   2017   (3)
Concord (Charlotte), NC  1,069,039   2017   2017   (3)
Kenton, OH  454,776   2017   2017   (3)
Stow, OH  448,829   2017   2017   (3)
Charleston, SC (FDX)  397,072   2017   2018   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  603,861   2017   2018   (3)
Savannah, GA  882,410   2018   2018   (3)
Daytona Beach, FL  344,276   2018   2018   (3)
Mobile, AL  195,973   2018   2018   (3)
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  168,689   2018   2018   (3)
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  98,855   2018   2018   (3)
Shopping Center                
Somerset, NJ  1,589,653   1970   1970   (3)
Vacant Land                
Shelby County, TN  -0-   N/A   2007   N/A 
  $207,065,634             

(3)Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated lives:

Building: 31.5 to 39 years; Building Improvements: 3 to 39 years; Tenant Improvements: Lease Term

148

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

(1)Reconciliation

REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

  9/30/2018  9/30/2017  9/30/2016 
          
Balance-Beginning of Year $1,431,916,534  $1,150,395,427  $920,143,937 
Additions:            
Acquisitions  277,253,327   282,509,249   209,867,577 
Improvements  10,408,558   4,168,984   20,383,913 
Total Additions  287,661,885   286,678,233   230,251,490 
Deletions:            
Sales  -0-   (5,157,126)  -0- 
Total Deletions  -0-   (5,157,126)  -0- 
             
Balance-End of Year $1,719,578,419  $1,431,916,534  $1,150,395,427 

ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

  9/30/2018  9/30/2017  9/30/2016 
          
Balance-Beginning of Year $171,086,083  $143,006,233  $119,545,674 
Depreciation  36,017,959   29,015,821   23,460,559 
Sales  (38,408)  (935,971)  -0- 
             
Balance-End of Year $207,065,634  $171,086,083  $143,006,233 

149

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III

SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

(1)Reconciliation

  2018  2017  2016 
Balance – Beginning of Year $1,431,916,534  $1,150,395,427  $920,143,937 
Additions:            
Somerset, NJ $38,887   -0-   377,637 
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA  24,825   79,618   37,255 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  26,663   -0-   7,797 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  267,031   94,717   -0- 
Richland (Jackson), MS  -0-   -0-   -0- 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Fayetteville, NC  -0-   9,753   557,354 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  -0-   196,526   13,775 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  -0-   -0-   8,700 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  65,165   66,974   -0- 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  -0-   -0-   24,263 
Omaha, NE  -0-   -0-   7,410 
Charlottesville, VA  98,714   8,489   4,462 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  67,174   83,383   16,983 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   4,996   -0- 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  7,384   26,830   18,510 
St. Joseph, MO  74,378   55,564   50,934 
Newington (Hartford), CT  -0-   30,284   -0- 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  384,000   -0-   8,689 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  -0-   -0-   44,600 
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  38,813   -0-   13,877 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  -0-   155,034   156,139 
Winston-Salem, NC  7,713   -0-   316,527 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  -0-   44,526   5,960 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  -0-   -0-   1,655,640 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle Tire)  -0-   7,585   -0- 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  444,822   -0-   -0- 
Richmond, VA  -0-   -0-   7,540 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  5,348   125   1,247,140 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  4,950   -0-   -0- 
Denver, CO  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  35,661   33,849   40,000 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  -0-   9,270   25,161 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  -0-   -0-   26,916 
Huntsville, AL  -0-   56,688   1,853,390 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  -0-   6,047   24,700 
Lakeland, FL  60,694   -0-   16,321 
El Paso, TX  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  11,700   -0-   -0- 
Colorado Springs, CO (A)  -0-   -0-   9,357 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  237,196   27,063   27,144 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  64,826   -0-   -0- 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  58,225   -0-   -0- 
Orion, MI  4,488   -0-   5,867 
Chattanooga, TN  122,022   4,315   41,042 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  -0-   55,957   84,288 
Punta Gorda, FL  -0-   20,245   8,350 
Cocoa, FL  -0-   -0-   37,606 
Orlando, FL  220,092   -0-   13,195 
Topeka, KS  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Memphis, TN  (6,950)  1,050   -0- 
Houston, TX  14,820   65,351   -0- 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  -0-   50,097   24,806 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  1,660,729   -0-   -0- 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Edinburg, TX  -0-   615,142   3,985,389 

150

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III, (CONT’D)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2018

(1)Reconciliation (cont’d)

  2018  2017  2016 
          
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH $-0-  $-0-  $-0- 
Corpus Christi, TX  36,417   7,413   -0- 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  -0-   4,200   (13,611)
Waco, TX  -0-   5,210   -0- 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  -0-   -0-   31,497 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  -0-   -0-   9,412,120 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Green Bay, WI  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Tulsa, OK  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  -0-   40,000   48,136 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  -0-   -0-   5,355 
Altoona, PA  14,316   -0-   18,650 
Spring (Houston), TX  10,598   -0-   56,275 
Indianapolis, IN  497,710   1,060,372   -0- 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  -0-   -0-   4,950 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  29,050   6,500   -0- 
Kansas City, MO  329,024   51,226   -0- 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  3,612   86,136   -0- 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  4,587,760   -0-   -0- 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  -0-   11,680   15,817 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Cincinnati, OH  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  -0-   1,068,900   31,975,897 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  -0-   -0-   18,410,000 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  -0-   -0-   19,950,000 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  -0-   17,867   30,210,680 
Colorado Springs, CO  820,066   -0-   28,500,000 
Louisville, KY  -0-   -0-   11,304,000 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  -0-   -0-   37,780,000 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  -0-   -0-   31,737,000 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  -0-   34,850,000   -0- 
Ft. Myers, FL  40,635   21,623,000   -0- 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  -0-   31,654,985   -0- 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  -0-   49,880,493   -0- 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  -0-   21,040,396   -0- 
Homestead (Miami), FL  -0-   37,873,120   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  -0-   8,728,439   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  -0-   40,043,145   -0- 
Kenton, OH  -0-   17,881,608   -0- 
Stow, OH  -0-   18,934,065   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  21,519,411   -0-   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  29,878,942   -0-   -0- 
Savannah, GA  56,025,945   -0-   -0- 
Daytona Beach, FL  29,973,199   -0-   -0- 
Mobile, AL  33,052,316   -0-   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  46,576,380   -0-   -0- 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  60,227,134   -0-   -0- 
Total Additions $287,661,885  $286,678,233  $230,251,490 
Total Disposals  -0-   (5,157,126)  -0- 
Balance – End of Year $1,719,578,419  $1,431,916,534  $1,150,395,427 

(A)This property was sold on June 1, 2018.

151

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
 CORPORATION
 (registrant)
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Michael P. Landy
  Michael P. Landy, President, Chief Executive
  Officer and Director, its principal executive officer
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Kevin S. Miller
  Kevin S. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, its principal
  financial officer and principal accounting officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Eugene W. Landy
  Eugene W. Landy, Chairman of the Board and Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Michael P. Landy
  Michael P. Landy, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Anna T. ChewKevin S. Miller
  Anna T. Chew,Kevin S. Miller, Chief Financial Officer and Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Kiernan Conway
Kiernan Conway, Director
Date: November 28, 2018By:/s/ Daniel D. Cronheim
  Daniel D. Cronheim, Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Catherine B. Elflein
  Catherine B. Elflein, Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Brian H. Haimm
  Brian H. Haimm, Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Neal Herstik
  Neal Herstik, Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Matthew I. Hirsch
  Matthew I. Hirsch, Director

Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Samuel A. Landy
  Samuel A. Landy, Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Gregory T. Otto
Gregory T. Otto, Director
Date: November 28, 2018By:/s/ Scott L. Robinson
  Scott L. Robinson, Director
   
Date: November 28, 20162018By:/s/ Stephen B. Wolgin
  Stephen B. Wolgin, Director