UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019

 

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ______________ to ______________

 

Commission File Number001-35436

 

TECNOGLASS INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Cayman Islands 98-1271120

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

 

Avenida Circunvalar a 100 mts de la Via 40

Barrio Las Flores, Barranquilla

Colombia

  
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

(57)(5)3734000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Ordinary Shares 
Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per shareTGLS The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

 

Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232 405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

[X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

 

Large accelerated filer [  ]Accelerated filer [  ][X]
Non-accelerated filer [  ]Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Emerging growth company [  ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

 

As of June 30, 20162019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the ordinary shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $66,151,398$121,634,899 based on its last reported sales price of $11.31$6.49 on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market.

 

As of December 31, 2016,February 28, 2020, there were33,172,14446,117,631 ordinary shares, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None.

 

 

 

 
 

 

TECNOGLASS INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I 
Item 1.Business.4
Item 1A.Risk Factors.1315
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.1334
Item 2.Properties.1434
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.1435
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.1435
  
PART II 
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.1535
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.1636
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.1636
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.2343
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.2343
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures.2344
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.2344
Item 9B.Other Information.2545
   
PART III 
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.2646
Item 11.Executive Compensation.2949
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.3051
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.3253
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.3354
   
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.3455
Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary.

3556

 

 2 
 

 

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INTRODUCTION

 

All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Form 10-K”) including, without limitation, statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding our financial position, business strategy and the plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward looking statements. When used in this Form 10-K, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, identify forward looking statements. Such forward looking statements are based on the beliefs of management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward looking statements as a result of certain factors detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All subsequent written or oral forward looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by this paragraph.

 

Unless the context otherwise requires:

 

references to the “Company”, “TGI”“Tecnoglass”, the “group” and to “we, “ “us” or “our” are to Tecnoglass Inc., a Cayman Islands exempted company, and its subsidiaries;
  
references to “Tecnoglass Holding” are to Tecno Corporation;
  
references to “Tecnoglass” and “TG” are to Tecnoglass S.A.;S.A.S;
  
references to “ES” are to C.I. Energía Solar S.A.S.A.S E.S. Windows;
  
references to “ESW” are to ES Windows LLC, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, based in Florida. We recently acquired ESW, which was formerly a related party of ours.
  
References to “VS” are to Ventana Solar S.A., a Panama-based company with which we have a strategic commercial relationship
  
references to “Tecno LLC” are to Tecnoglass LLC;
  
references to “Tecno RE” are to Tecno RE LLC; and
  

references to “ES Metals” are to ES Metals S.A.S.; and

references to “GM&P” are to Giovanni Monti and Partners Consulting and Glazing Contractors.

PART IOur registered trademarks include Alutions by TecnoglassTM, ECOMAX by ESWINDOWSTM, TecnobendTM, TecnoairTM, ESWINDOWS InteriorsTM, ESW Windows and WallsTM, Solartec by TecnoglassTM, Prestige by ESWINDOWSTM, Eli by ESWINDOWSTM, and Alessia by ESWINDOWSTM . Solely for our convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Form 10-K may appear without the “®” or “™” symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent possible under applicable law, our rights or the rights to these trademarks and trade names.

 

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA

In this Form 10-K, we refer to information and statistics regarding our industry, the size of certain markets and our position within the sectors in which we compete. Some of the market and industry data contained in this Form 10-K is based on independent industry and trade publications or other publicly available information, or information published by our customers, that we believe to be reliable sources, while other information is based on our good-faith estimates, which are derived from our review of internal surveys, as well as independent sources listed in this Form 10-K, and the knowledge and experience of our management in the markets in which we operate. The estimates contained in this Form 10-K have also been based on information obtained from our customers, suppliers and other contacts in the markets in which we operate. Although we believe that these independent sources and internal data are reliable as of their respective dates, the information contained in them has not been independently verified, nor have we sought consent to refer to their reports, and we cannot assure you as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. As a result, you should be aware that the market and industry data and the market share estimates set forth in this Form 10-K, and beliefs and estimates based thereon, may not be reliable. We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this Form 10-K for ease of presentation. As a result, amounts shown as totals in some tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the amounts that precede them.

PART I

Item 1.Business.

 

Overview

 

We were originally formed under the name “Andina Acquisition Corporation”Tecnoglass is a leading vertically-integrated manufacturer, supplier and installer of architectural glass, windows, and associated aluminum products for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities. On March 22, 2012, we consummated our initial public offering (the “IPO”),global commercial and on December 20, 2013, we consummated our initial business combination (the “Merger”), whereby our wholly-owned subsidiary merged with and intoresidential construction industries. Tecnoglass Holding. As a result ofwas rated the Merger, Tecnoglass Holding and its indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tecnoglass and ES, became our direct and indirect subsidiaries. Accordingly,second largest glass fabricator serving the business of Tecnoglass Holding and its subsidiaries became our business. We are now a holding company operating through our direct and indirect subsidiaries.

The Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition with Tecnoglass Holding being considered the accounting acquirerUnited States in the Merger. For accounting and financial purposes, we were treated as the acquired company, and Tecnoglass Holding was treated as the acquiring company. Accordingly, historical information, including historical financial information and the historical description of our business, for periods and dates prior to December 20, 2013, include information for Tecnoglass Holding and its subsidiaries.

In December 2016, as part of our strategy to vertically integrate our operations, we acquired 100% of the stock of ESW LLC, 85.06% of which was acquired directly2019 by the Company and 14.94% by our subsidiary ES, for a total purchase price of $13.5 million, which consisted of (i) 734,400 ordinary shares issued in connection with the transaction for approximately $9.2 million based on a stock price of $12.50, (ii) approximately $2.3 million in cash, and (iii) approximately $2.0 million related to the assignment of certain accounts receivable.

As the Acquisition of ESW LLC was deemed to be a transaction between entities under common control, the assets and liabilities were transferred at the historical cost of ESW LLC, with prior periods retroactively adjusted to include the historical financial results of the acquired company for the period they were controlled by the previous owners of ESW LLC in the Company’s financial statements. The following information includes the financial information as originally reported and as adjusted.

  December 31, 2015 
  Prior to acquisition  Effect of Acquisition  After acquisition 
          
Total Assets $316,199  $5,212  $321,411 
Total Sales $238,833  $3,406  $242,239 
             
Net income (loss) $(12,765) $

1,745

  $

(11,020

)
Basic income per share $(0.50) $0.09  $(0.42)
Diluted income per share $(0.50) $0.09  $(0.42)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  25,720,469   734,400   26,454,469 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  25,720,469   734,400   26,454,469 

The number of basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding prior to the acquisition of ESW LLC includes 272,905 shares issued after the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 were issued related to a stock dividend in November 2016.

The following table includes a reconciliation of the financial information for the year ended December 31, 2016 as being reported, the net effect of the ESW acquisition after elimination of intercompany transactions, and the financial information that would have been, had the Company not acquired ESW LLC:

  December 31, 2016 
  Without
acquisition
  Net effect of acquisition  Considering acquisition 
          
Total Assets $392,527  $2,203  $394,730 
Total Sales $299,972  $5,044  $305,016 
             
Net income (loss) $23,277  $(97) $23,180 
Basic income per share $0.82  $(0.03) $0.79 
Diluted income per share $0.79  $(0.02) $0.77 
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  28,497,054   734,400   29,231,054 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  29,519,068   734,400   30,253,068 

Our Business

General

We are a leading manufacturer of hi-spec architectural glass and windows for the western hemisphere residential and commercial construction industries, operating through our direct and indirect subsidiaries.Glass Magazine. Headquartered in Barranquilla, Colombia, we operatethe Company operates out of a 2.7 million square foot vertically-integrated, state-of-the-art manufacturing complex that provides easy access to the Americas, the Caribbean, and the Pacific.

We sell our products to more than 900 Tecnoglass supplies over 1,000 customers in North, Central and South America. TheAmerica, with the United States accountedaccounting for approximately 62% and 59%80% of our combined revenues in 2016 and 2015, respectively, while Colombia accounted for approximately 32% and 34%, and Panama for approximately 3% and 3% of our combined revenues in those years, respectively. Ourrevenues. Tecnoglass’ tailored, high-end products are found on some of the world’s most distinctive properties, including the El Dorado Airport (Bogota), 50 UNUnited Nations Plaza (New York), UB Law (Baltimore) Fordham University Law School (New York), Soho MallTrump Plaza (Panama), Brickell City CentreIcon Bay (Miami), Wesleyan (Houston) and the El Dorado Airport (Bogota)Salesforce Tower (San Francisco).

On May 3, 2019, we consumated a joint venture agreement with Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A. (“Saint-Gobain”), a world leader in the production of float glass, a key component of our manufacturing process, whereby we acquired a 25.8% minority ownership interest in Vidrio Andino Holdings S.A.S (“Vidirio Andino”), a Colombia-based subsidiary of Saint-Gobain. The purchase price for our interest in Vidrio Andino was $45 million, of which $34.1 million was paid in cash and $10.9 million will be paid through the contribution of land on our behalf by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, José M. Daes and Christian T. Daes in the first quarter of 2020. Vidrio Andino’s float glass plant located in the outskirts of Bogota, Colombia had been one of our main suppliers of raw glass. We beleive this transaction will solidify our vertical integration strategy by acquiring an interest in the first stage of our production chain, while securing ample glass supply for our expected production needs.

Additionally, the joint venture agreement includes plans to build a new plant in Galapa, Colombia that will be located approximately 20 miles from our primary manufacturing facility, in which we will also have a 25.8% interest. The new plant will be funded with proceeds from the original cash contribution made by the Company, operating cashflows from the Bogota plant, debt incurred at the joint venture level that will not consolidate into the Company and a potential additional contribution by us of approximately $12.5 million to be paid between 2020 and 2021.

Our Business

General

We are a vertically-integrated manufacturer, supplier and installer of architectural glass, windows and associated aluminum products for the global commercial and residential construction markets. With a focus on innovation, combined with providing highly specified products with the highest quality standards at competitive prices, we have developed a leadership position in each of our core markets. In the United States, which is our largest market, we were ranked as the second largest glass fabricator in 2019 by Glass Magazine. In addition, we believe we are the leading glass transformation company in Colombia. Our customers, which include developers, general contractors or installers for hotels, office buildings, shopping centers, airports, universities, hospitals and multi-family and residential buildings, look to us as a leading manufacturervalue-added partner based on our product development capabilities, our high quality products and our unwavering commitment to exceptional service.

We have more than 35 years of experience in architectural glass and aluminum profile structure assembly. We transform a variety of glass products, installed primarily in commercial and residential buildings, including tempered safety, double thermo-acoustic and laminated glass. TecnoglassOur finished glass products are installed in hotels, residential buildings, commercial and corporate centers, universities, airports and hospitals in a wide variety of buildings across a number of different applications, such asincluding floating facades, curtain walls, windows, doors, handrails, and interior and bathroom spatial dividers. In 2015 Tecnoglass established its Solartec plant, toWe also produce low emissivity glass with high thermal insulation specifications using soft coat technology.

Tecnoglass also produces aluminum products such as profiles, rods, bars, plates and other hardware used in the manufacturemanufacturing of windows. In 2007, Tecnoglass established its Alutions plant

Our products are manufactured in a 2.7 million square foot, state-of-the-art manufacturing complex in Barranquilla, Colombia for extrusion, smelting, paintingthat provides easy access to North, Central and anodizing processes,South America, the Caribbean and for exporting, importing and marketing aluminum products. The Alutions plant contributes allthe Pacific. Our products can be found on some of the raw materials needed for productionmost distinctive buildings in these regions, including El Dorado Airport (Bogota), 50 United Nations Plaza (New York), Trump Plaza (Panama), Icon Bay (Miami), and Salesforce Tower (San Francisco). Our track record of Tecnoglass aluminum products.successfully delivering high profile projects has earned us an increasing number of opportunities across the United States, evidenced by our expanding backlog and overall revenue growth.

 

Glass Magazine ranked Tecnoglass as the second largest glass fabricator serving the U.S. market in 2016. We believe that itOur structural competitive advantage is the leading glass transformation companyunderpinned by our low-cost manufacturing footprint, vertically integrated business model and geographic location. Our integrated facilities in Colombia capturing 40% of the market shareand distribution and services operations in the country by salesFlorida provide us with a significant cost advantage in both manufacturing and volume.distribution, and we continue to invest in these operations to expand our operational capabilities. Our lower cost manufacturing footprint allows us to offer competitive prices for our customers, while also providing innovative, high quality and high value-added products, together with consistent and reliable service. We have historically generated high margin organic growth based on our position as a value-added solutions provider for our customers.

 

The Company is alsoWe have a leader in the production of high-end windows, with more than 33 years of experience in the glass and aluminum structure assembly market in Colombia. The Company designs, manufactures, markets and installs architectural systems for high, medium and low rise construction, glass and aluminum windows and doors, office dividers and interiors, floating facades and commercial display windows.

The Company has an important and dominantstrong presence in the Florida market, which has historically represented (and continues to represent)represents a substantial portion of our total salesrevenue stream and backlog. The Company grewOur success in the Florida market not onlyhas primarily been achieved through sustained organic growth, but also through the asset acquisitionswith further penetration now taking place into other highly populated areas of Glasswall LLC and RC Aluminum, both in 2014, and the recent acquisition of ESW (formerly a related party), which would reinforce our vertical integration strategy and expansion strategy into U.S. markets. ES has expanded its U.S. sales outside of the Florida market for windows, and into the high-tech market for curtain walls, a product that is in high demand and we believe represents a new trend in architecture, and floating façades. For example, it has been used in El Dorado Airport (Bogotá), University of Baltimore Law School (Baltimore) and Via 57 West (New York). Due to the sophistication of these new products, we believe that we can generate higher margins through the sale of curtain walls as compared to traditional window frames or floor-to-ceiling windows. Curtain walls produced by the Company are composed of high performance materials produced by Alutions, our aluminum smelting plant, and our glass treatment plant.

In 2014, we established two entities in South Florida, Tecno LLC and Tecno RE, to acquire manufacturing and warehousing facilities, customer lists and exclusive design permits in order to support sales growth in the United States. We will continue to manufacture our products at our facilities in Barranquilla, Colombia while performing select manufacturing and light assembly in the U.S. to enhance client service and create certain cost efficiencies.

In Panama, ES sells products primarily to companies participating in large construction projects in the exclusive areas of Panama City. For example, ES products were supplied in the construction of the tallest building in Central and South America, The Point, as well as in the construction of other modern hotels in the region, such as Megapolis, and in the development of the Soho Plaza, a complex consisting of a shopping mall and two skyscrapers.

As part of our strategy to become a fully vertically integrateintegrated company, we have supplemented our operations, on December 2,organic growth with some acquisitions that have allowed us added control over our supply chain allowed for further vertical integration of our business and will act as a platform for our future expansion in the United States. In 2016, we acquired 100% ofcompleted the stockacquisition of ESW, LLC, for a total purchase pricewhich gave us control over the distribution of $13.5 million. Since 2004,products into the United States from our manufacturing facilities in Colombia. In March 2017, we have a strategic commercial relationship with ESW LLC, a Florida-based company partially owned by Christian T. Daes and José M. Daes, who are also our executive officers and directors, up onto recent acquisition. ESW LLC acts as onecompleted the acquisition of ES’s importers and distributors in the U.S. and is a member of the American Architectural Manufacturers Association, a technical information center for the architecture industry with highest standards. ESW LLC sends project specifications and orders from its clients to ES, and in turn, receives pricing quotes from ES which are conveyed to the client.

As a subsequent event, on March 1, 2017, the Company entered into and consummated a purchase agreement with Giovanni Monti, the owner of 100% of the outstanding shares of GM&P. GM&P, is a consulting and glazing contracting company locatedinstallation business that was previously our largest installation customer.

On May 3, 2019, we consummated the joint venture agreement with Saint-Gobain, acquiring a 25.8% minority ownership interest in Miami, Florida with over 15 yearsVidrio Andino, a Colombia-based subsidiary of experienceSaint-Gobain, solidifying our vertical integration strategy by acquiring an interest in the design and installationfirst stage of various building enclosure systems such as curtain window walls andour production chain, while securing ample glass supply for our expected production needs. Additionally, in April 2019, ESMetals, a long-standing commercial relationship with the Company, working alongside itColombian entity in different projects within the U.S, by providing engineering and installation services to those projects. The Company acquired all of the shares of GM&P for a purchase price of $35 million, of which the Company will pay $6 millionhas 70% equity interest began operations. ESMetals serves as a metalwork contractor to supply the Company with steel accessories used in the assembly of certain architectural systems as part of our vertical integration strategy.

The continued diversification of the purchasegroup’s presence and product portfolio is a core component of our strategy. In particular, we are actively seeking to expand our presence in the United States outside of Florida. We also launched a residential windows offering which, we believe, will help us expand our presence in the United States and generate additional organic growth. We believe that the quality of our products, coupled with our ability to price competitively given our structural advantages on cost, will allow us to generate further growth in cash within the 60 days following the closing date and the remaining $29 million of the purchase price to be payable on or before September 1, 2017 in cash, our ordinary shares or a combination of both, at our sole option.

future.

Competitive Strengths

Our success has been grounded in our ability to offer high quality products at the most competitive prices. We are able to competitively price our products, while still achieving strong margins, due to a number of unique cost advantages. In addition to our vertically integrated business model, we benefit from structural cost advantages in manufacturing and distribution due to our geographic location. Alongside these structural advantages, we are committed to quality, product innovation and customer service. We believe these competitive strengths create a significant barrier to entry, which is underpinned and sustained by the experience of our senior management team and the loyalty of our highly motivated employees.

 

Vertical Integration

 

We believe we are unique within the industry in vertically integrating the purchasepurchasing of raw materials the manufacture of glass and aluminum products and the subsequent productionmanufacturing, distribution and distributioninstallation of customized glass and windows for architectural and industrial settings.our products. By vertically integrating each of these functions, we are able to priceeliminate inefficiencies throughout the supply chain and generate strong margins. These efficiencies are only enhanced as our products competitivelybusiness grows and we benefit from operating leverage and economies of scale. In particular, our May 3, 2019 joint venture with Saint-Gobain has solidified our vertical integration strategy by providing us with an interest in the first stage of our production chain, while maintainingsecuring ample glass supply for our expected production needs.

This business model also allows us to maintain strict quality control, measuresfrom the sourcing of input materials to guarantee the high qualityinstallation of our finished products. Additionally, we benefit from significant advantages in efficiencyOur vertically integrated business model therefore enables us to provide consistent high-quality products to our end-customers. Ownership of the entire production process also reduces our dependence on third parties, allowing us to respond more quickly to our customers’ needs and time-to-marketreducing lead-times for new or customized products. This vertically integrated model provides attractive margins with significant operating leverage.

Ideally situated,Cost of Production Advantages

We enjoy significant cost advantages because of our location in Colombia that we would not be able to realize if our production facility was located in the United States. We believe we are able to offer competitive prices, in part, as a result of our low labor and energy costs relative to those in the United States while maintaining efficient transportation costs into the markets we serve. Employees at our manufacturing facilities in Colombia earn above the local minimum wage, yet these wages are typically less than one quarter of the cost of a comparable employee located within the United States. In 2018, we completed a solar panel project with easy accessthe capacity to cost-efficient transport hubsgenerate approximately five megawatts of eco-friendly energy on-site at our manufacturing facilities. This investment has allowed us to reduce energy costs, while also having a positive tax effect due to our ability to deduct the investment from our taxable income in compliance with applicable Colombian tax regulations.

Low-Cost Distribution

 

Our principal manufacturing facilities arefacility is located in Barranquilla, Colombia, which is strategically located near three of the country’s major ports: Barranquilla, Cartagena and Santa Marta. These ports which are no more than two hours’ drive from each other, provide us with maritime access to all major markets globally.global markets. The Barranquilla port is just 16 kilometers away from our production facilities,facility. From there, our products can be shipped to Miami in three days and shipping to Miami’s main port is a three-day journey, six days to New York and 11 days to Los Angeles (through the Panama Canal). Our location provides a significant competitive advantage in light of the relatively low cost of shippingfour days. In addition, for short lead-time projects, our products can be transported by air from Barranquilla to Houston or Miami within a few hours.

As a result of the U.S. (particularly Florida) as comparedsignificant trade imbalance between Colombia and the United States for goods transported in container ships, we are able to transport our products to the United States in containers that would otherwise return empty to the United States. We are therefore able to distribute our products to the eastern, southern and western regions of the United States at very attractive rates, which are often lower than a comparable domestic land shipment within the United States. Demand for high-specification architectural glass is typically highest in large coastal cities, which we are able to ship to directly, while most of our competitors must utilize relatively expensive land transportation services to deliver finished goods to these sites.

Commitment to Quality and Innovation

Our commitment to quality is evidenced by our significant recent investments in machinery and equipment. Since 2012, we have invested nearly $300 million in the latest technologies to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of our production lines, and ultimately to improve the quality of the products that we deliver to our main competitors located elsewhere, even includingcustomers. We believe these significant investments position us to meet our competitors locatedgrowth objectives over the next several years. We operate state-of-the-art glass making equipment, glass laminating lines, aluminum presses and high-volume insulating equipment which facilitate more precise manufacturing, enabling us to offer a broader selection of and higher quality products and remain agile in Midwest U.S. responding to customer demands, while generating less raw material waste.

We believe our investments in technology within recent years have positioned us well for continued growth, improved profitability and enhanced cash generation in the years ahead. Recent examples of our investments include:

our acquisition of three aluminum extrusion presses that together added more than 1,000 tons of production capacity per month, alongside associated investments in new aluminum paint lines and foundries;
our purchase of equipment used to produce soft-coated, low emissivity glass;
our completion of our solar panel project that generates approximately five megawatts of eco-friendly energy at our manufacturing facilities.
our purchase of glass-laminating and tempering furnaces that use state-of the-art technology to produce curved glass in a broad range of easily modifiable curvatures (“TecnoBend”). TecnoBend uses a flexible mold to produce customized shapes for architectural structures;
our investment in a jumbo tempering oven capable of producing extra-large slabs of laminated glass. These products are sought after in high-specification designs, allowing us to supply these high profile projects. For example, our extra-large glass slabs were recently installed in the El Dorado Airport, located in Bogotá, Colombia.

our investment of $5.1 million in a vertical paint line and in an additional extrusion press, which we expect to expand our aluminum production capacity in tons by roughly 29%, and the completion in July 2019 of a $5.2 million investment to create a new automated aluminum warehouse, which we expect will further reduce process lead times in the assembly of our curtain wall systems; and
the investment of $9.9 million in an automated glass sorting and processing system, which will increase the capacity of two of our ten production lines by over 160% (or 10% of our total production capacity) while reducing employee headcount, and reduce process lead time.

Our quality assurance department maintains rigorous oversight over the production process to ensure the consistent production of high quality products. In addition, we adhere to quality standards that meet all guidelines and requirements for the Insulating Glass Certification Council (IGCC) and Safety Glazing Certification Council (SGCC) certification programs.

Finally, our commitment to quality also extends to our partnerships and alliances. Most notably, for certain products we offer Kuraray Sentryglass®. These laminated glass interlayers are five times stronger than conventional laminating materials.

On September 20, 2018, we entered an agreement with Schüco USA LLLP (“Schüco”), a division of the Schüco International KG, a worldwide leader of architectural systems headquartered in Germany, with more than 60 years of experience and a presence in over 80 countries. Schüco is known for its expertise in the innovative design of building envelopes, windows, doors and facade systems, for the construction industry. This agreement enables Tecnoglass to manufacture and sell Schüco’s architectural systems to customers in North, Central and South America, alongside our existing ESWindows products. Additionally, Tecnoglass will extrude and paint aluminum profile designs as part of Schüco’s global supply chain primarily for products sold in the United States. This agreement allows Tecnoglass to expand its portfolio and offer more solutions to its clients with high-end, renowned designs.

Superior Customer Service

In addition to very positive impact on cost structure,manufacturing high quality products at competitive prices, our strategic location allows us to be more responsivecustomer value proposition is supplemented by short lead-times, on-time delivery and after-sale support. Through the coordinated efforts of our sales teams, product specialists and field service teams, we deliver high quality service to our customers’ requirements.customers, from the initial order to the delivery and installation of our products. We believe our ability to accompany our clients throughout every phase of their projects’ engineering, consulting, manufacturing and installation along with our ability to coordinate these efforts as a one-stop-shop is a key differentiator from our competition.

7

 

High Barriers to Entry

 

Entry into manyThe ability of new competitors to enter the markets that we serve is limited due to the technical certifications required on high specification building projects, such as IGCC, IqNet Icontec 14001 and ISO9001. OurWe attribute our success, in those markets is due in large part, to our ability to produce a broad range of sophisticated products, the breadth of our product offering andas well as our reputation for delivering high quality, made-to-order architectural glass on time. These factors are required to compete successfully for multimillion dollar projects typical of our business. GivenOur employees have extensive training, knowledge and experience at manufacturing high specification products. We believe the vertically-integrated nature of our operations including the aluminum extrusion products provided by TG,means that there is a more limited set of competitorsare high barriers to successfully entering our markets and entry into these markets.competing with us on price, quality and agility. In addition, the equipment needed to operate in the glass and window industry is expensive, therefore requiring a significant upfront capital investment. In addition, our ES Windows University provides training to our employees ensuring a dedicated and loyal work force, giving us an advantage that potential competitors lack, as they may not be able to bear the cost of providing similar training or retaining similarly trained employees.

 

InnovationLoyal and Highly Motivated Employees

 

Capitalizing on our various competitive advantages also requires a skilled and dedicated workforce. We have made significant investments in machineryactively encourage and equipment in orderfacilitate the development of our employees through rolling training programs, with multiple training sessions held every week. These programs increase the skills of our employees and are designed to deployallow our employees to keep pace with the latestnew technologies being installed at our manufacturing facilities. We are committed to developing our employees and remaining at the forefront of technology in our production lines. We have state-of-the-art glass making equipment, glass laminating lines and high-volume insulating equipment, which allow for a more precise and high quality manufacturing less raw material waste and the chance of developing new products. Being able to employ state-of-the-art technology is a competitive differentiator that (i) allows us to produce higher-quality products creating a competitive pricing advantage that can translate into higher margins, (ii) allows for less material waste and a more energy efficient process, and (iii) enables the manufacturing of a broader array of products.

During the last two years, we acquired three aluminum extrusion presses that together added more than 1,000 tons of production capacity per month, along with related aluminum paint line and a new foundry, which investments totaled $80.2 million in 2015 and $42.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2016.
In August 2014, we entered into a contract to purchase equipment to produce soft coated low emissivity glass as part of our improvement plan, which started production in the last quarter of 2015 and was in production throughout 2016.
We purchased two glass-laminating and tempering furnaces that use state-of the-art technologies to produce tempered glass with no distortion using air cushion technology (TecnoAir) and to produce curved glass in a broad range of easily modifiable curvatures (TecnoBend). TecnoAir technology glass sheets “float” on air pressing systems rather than running on metallic rolls. TecnoBend has a flexible mold that permits different curved shapes to be employed in architectural structures.
For certain of our products, we offer DuPont Sentryglass®, laminated glass interlayers recognized as industry-leading laminated glass solutions with five times the resistance strength of competing materials.
We also use a laminator and jumbo tempering oven capable of producing extra-large slabs of laminated glass, which are sought after in the high-end window market. For example, our extra-large glass slabs have been recently used in El Dorado Airport (Bogotá).

industry. These investments in machinery and equipment, togetherhave also helped us manage workplace injuries, with our highly trained labor force, allow us to offer state-of-the-art custom designed products that are tailored to meet customer demands.

Competitive cost structurerate of one accident per 30 workers per year, being substantially lower than the average of one accident per 12 workers per year for manufacturing companies in Colombia.

 

We provide high quality products to our customers at competitive prices primarily as a result of the efficiencies we achieve through vertical integration and comparatively low labor costs. Our ES Windows University provides training tovalue our employees ensuring a dedicated and loyal work force that works efficientlyinvest in them and also is less susceptible to workplace injuries. These competitive advantages give us greater flexibility in pricing without adversely affecting our profit margins and allow our products to be competitive in a variety of markets.

Superior Customer Service

In addition to manufacturing high quality products, our value proposition to our customers is based on industry-leading lead times, on-time delivery and superior after-sale support. Through the coordinated efforts of our sales teams, product specialists, and field service teams, we deliver high quality service to our customers, from the time the initial order is placed through the delivery and installation of our products. By providing an efficient flow of product from order through delivery, our manufacturing processes allow us to deliver made-to-order products consistently on time, which we believe is an important competitive strength.

Management Experience

José Daes, our chief executive officer, and Christian Daes, our chief operating officer, have more than 30 years of industry experience, respectively. In addition, our executive management teams have worked together for many years at our operating subsidiaries. This long tenure in the industry, and as a team, has enabled our management to build significant relationships with both clients and field level management. We believe that these relationships, coupled with management’s strong technical expertise, create a significant competitive advantage.

Strong relationship with local communities

their communities. For several decades, we have had committed resources to improving the quality of life of our employees and thelocal communities. Our foundation, “Fundación Tecnoglass,” provides local communities, surrounding our plants. As a result of these initiatives, we have developed close and cooperative relationships with local communities in Colombia, which are supported by several social responsibility initiatives we have undertaken. We view our employees as key to our historical and future success and therefore have focused initiatives of our non-for-profit,Fundación Tecnoglass,on offering our employees and their families the resources to purchasewith assistance purchasing or improve theirimproving homes through thePrograma de Mejora de Vivienda. Additionally, our foundation offers educational stipends forand facilitating higher education pursuits.scholarships. During 2016, 602019, over 200 families were benefited from ourPrograma de Mejora de Vivienda, and currently we are sponsoring 128 employees and their children through our scholarship program,Programa de Becas.these initiatives. Fundación Tecnoglass also supports a school provides funding for primarydifferent local schools looking to improve social transformation and secondary educationcommunity development. Vive Bailando and Colombia Campo para Crecer, are youth oriented programs in the La PazLas Flores neighborhood (local community near Tecnoglass’ headquarters) has positively impacted more than 180 families in Barranquilla, Colombia, and, in collaboration withFundación Pacific Rubiales,Fundación Colombia Somos Todos and soccer star James Rodriguez,less than a year. Additionally, we support children in vulnerable neighborhoods to thrive through sports, with around 400 children participating to date, among several other social welfare programs designed to lend supportdonate our recyclable glass to the most vulnerable citizens in Barranquillafoundation, which sells it to local recycling cooperatives and its surrounding communities. All ofuses the proceeds to fund scholarships for Company employees. We believe these initiatives have allowed us to maintain an excellenta strong relationship with our employees, which in which weturn has ensured a skilled, motivated and loyal workforce with low levels of turnover. We have been able to maintain a labor union free environmentremained union-free since our incorporation.incorporation in 1984.

 

Strategy

 

We have identified the following itemsstrategic priorities that we believe are important in advancing our business:

 

DevelopmentFurther Geographic Penetration in the United States

We have successfully established a leading reputation in the Florida construction market by providing high value, impact-resistant architectural glass products. Our products have become widely regarded in Florida for their quality and are certified in compliance with all U.S. regulations. Since 2016, the United States region has grown from 67% of additional high-valueour backlog to 90% of our backlog as of December 31, 2019.

Sales in Florida comprised 89% of United States revenue in the year ended December 31, 2019. In recent years, we have begun to successfully grow our geographic presence in the United States outside of Florida, particularly into markets along the east coast, and as a result, 35% of our U.S. Backlog is for projects outside of Florida. Coastal markets are particularly attractive to us, as they can be directly accessed by ship, resulting in transportation costs from our manufacturing facilities that are similar to our transportation costs to Florida. These regions are also affected by hurricanes, significant temperature fluctuations and other extreme forms of weather that foster demand for our products. We are actively expanding our sales presence in these costal markets and have already successfully completed several projects in large U.S. markets such as New York, Boston, Washington D.C. and Baltimore as well as cities along the U.S. Gulf Coast, such as Houston.

We intend to continue growing the business organically outside of Florida. As we explore growth opportunities in new U.S. markets, we intend to leverage the strong reputation we have developed with national commercial construction contractors, architects and designers for providing high quality products supportedat the most competitive prices.

Penetrate the U.S. Residential Market

In April 2017 we launched “ES Windows: Elite Collection” and “ES Windows: Prestige Collection” to target the U.S. residential new and replacement sectors. We have received positive interest for the new products to date and positive reactions from our customers. Although residential sales represent a relatively small portion of our sales today, we believe it will be a significant source of growth for us in the future. Our U.S. residential market sales represent 15% of our total sales for the year ended December 31, 2019. The U.S. residential housing construction market exceeded $541 billion in spending during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 according to the United States Census Bureau. Residential housing starts are expected to increase by continued investmentsmore than 6% during 2020, according to Evercore ISI research. We believe that our core strengths that have facilitated our success to date, namely the quality of our products and the structural cost advantages that allows us to price our products competitively, will similarly contribute to our success in equipment and state-of-the-art technology.residential window sales.

Continued Investment in Technology to Meet Evolving Demands

 

We have a track record of developing innovative new products, and willwe intend to continue toour focus on capitalizing on new product opportunities in the future. We are constantly identify shiftingidentifying shifts in global trends and growing marketplacecustomer needs, and design proposalsdesigning new products to meet those needs.changes in demand. In order to continue this success, it is critical that we invest in the latest technologies available in our industry. For instance,example, with the installation of our new soft coatingsoft-coating facility, we are now able to manufacture low emissivity glass that is energy efficient and will allow us to service ameet growing market that demandsdemand for “green” initiatives.products.

We operate state-of-the-art architectural glass making equipment, glass laminating lines, aluminum presses and high-volume insulating equipment, which facilitate more precise manufacturing and generate less raw material waste. We will seek to leverage our existingthis platform of cutting-edge production facilitiesequipment to adapt our products to evolving demands for structural architectural glass in ourboth current markets and evaluate opportunities to enter new markets. We expect that our reputation and proven track-record offocus on innovation, which is founded upon our investments in technology, will position us well to take advantage of thesenew opportunities.

 

We madeAdditionally, the Company is carrying out enhancements at its glass and aluminum facilities to increase production capacity and automate operations. The Company anticipates that these high return investments will speed up production processes in response to strong customer demand, especially for aluminum products. The Company expects to improve efficiency in its glass production by automating certain processes to increase capacity, while reducing material waste and overall lead times. In its aluminum operations, the Company intends to benefit from a 25% increase in capacity and favorable operating leverage with the addition of an aggregatealuminum furnace and a new extrusion line, along with working capital improvements through the automation of $136.8 million from 2014 to 2015, and $42.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, including:

state-of-the-art glass-making equipment;
the installation of new laminating lines;
high-volume insulating equipment;
a new aluminum extrusion press with the capacity for an additional one thousand tons per month;
a new paint line with the capacity to treat one million pounds of aluminum per month; and
a new aluminum foundry.

Additionally, we arewarehousing systems. The Company completed this aluminum capacity expansion in the processmiddle of implementing new technologiesJuly of 2019 and implemented its automation initiatives, with a total anticipated of approximately $23 million with this funding being executed since the end of 2018 and expected to produce tempered glass that offers notably more transparencybe completed by the first quarter of 2020. The Company expects to continue funding these capital investments mainly with significantly less distortion than industry standard using air cushion technology, as well as new technology used to produce curved glass in a broad range of easily modifiable curvatures. Additionally, in 2014 we started producing architectural systems that integrate LED lighting allowing the façade of the building to display different colors and patterns. We further intend to explore expanding our operation to provide value-added glass products such as our soft-coated low-emissivity window panes that minimize the effect of solar heat.cash on hand.

 

We believe these innovative products will provide us with a competitive edge. The continued development of new products with the corresponding investments in technology, allows usRigorous Adherence to support our track-record of innovation and allow for continued customer demand by fulfilling ever-changing needs.

Manufacture the highest quality products in the market through a rigorous quality assurance programQuality Standards

 

Our plantsMaintaining the high quality standards for which we have become known is essential to the execution of our strategy. All of our internal processes are organized internally by processes, each of which iscontinually and independently and continually supervised by theTecnoglass’ Quality Assurance department. The Quality Assurance department maintains rigorous oversight overof optimization indicators covering energy, water, recyclable waste and process optimizationother facets of the production process. Constant monitoring of these indicators in orderis integral to ensuring that we consistently produce high quality sustainable products. Our quality assurance control system has established the measures and indicators necessary for the inspections implemented over the reception of materials, production process and final products. Additionally, betweenBetween 5% and 10% of our production is randomly chosen, is sent to our laboratoriesselected to verify compliance with a variety of quality standards, such as water leaks, functionality, manufacturing and accessories, through tests undertaken according to ASTM International (ASTM) and AAMAAmerican Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) rules. We have implemented these

These measures in orderallow us to reach an effective control in detecting potentialeffectively detect issues and to take the specific actions to mitigate their occurrence. By providingreoccurrence. As we grow and our use of technology evolves, our Quality Assurance team must also evolve its tests, controls and remedies. We believe this rigorous adherence to quality control will ensure that we will continue to provide the highest quality products and, ensuring they meet the highest standards of quality, we seek to ensureultimately, promote customer satisfaction and loyalty.satisfaction.

 

Continued vertical integration provides margin enhancement

We benefit from having our key operating companies and processes operating together at a combined facility, providing advantages in meeting customer and market needs, controlling supply chain issues and managing operating costs. By continuing to operate as a vertically integrated company, we seek to further enhance productivity, create cost efficiencies and increase operating margins. In recent developments, we strive to further vertically integrate the operations of the Company through the acquisition of ESW LLC, an importer and distributor of Company products in the U.S in December 2016. Furthermore, on March 1, 2017, the Company acquired GM&P, a South Florida glazing contracting company to incorporate the design and installation of various building enclosure systems such as curtain window walls and a long-standing commercial relationship with the Company, working alongside it in different projects within the U.S, by providing engineering and installation services to those projects.

Leverage strength in Florida market to further penetrate U.S.

We believe we have an established and leading presence in the Florida construction market as providers of high value, impact-resistant glass products. ES’s hurricane-proof products are certified in compliance with the stringent requirements of hurricane-proof windows in accordance with applicable U.S. regulations. With a quality of product proven by our success and compliance in the impact-resistant market, we have successfully entered the U.S. remodeling and replacement parts market. In addition, we have grown geographically in the U.S., particularly into other coastal markets on the East Coast which are affected by hurricanes, significant temperature fluctuations and other extreme weather. As we continue to explore opportunities in other markets in the U.S., we intend to leverage the strong reputation we have developed in markets such as Florida to take advantage of a resurgent commercial and residential real estate sector.

Continue to leverage strength in Colombia market to further penetrate Latin America

With a strong base in Colombia, we have already successfully expanded into nearby geographies. Our glass products are featured in major construction projects in Argentina, Aruba, Costa Rica, Panama and Puerto Rico. As the construction market throughout Latin America grows, we are positioned to capture new growth in the markets we have currently penetrated, as well as in new high growth countries. We will also take advantage of our geographical location to deliver products to South American markets at relatively low shipping and operating cost.

Maintain fast and reliable delivery to customers due to strategic location

From the Port of Barranquilla, products can be transported to Panama by air in one hour and to Houston and Miami within two hours, within two days by sea to Panama and within four days by sea to Houston and Miami. Our ability to deliver our products on a timely basis complements the relatively low cost of shipping our products from Barranquilla to Florida and supports the value of our strategic location. As a result of this strategic location, we are able to meet the requirements of architectures and developers who seek to obtain building products on a schedule that does not interfere with their construction progress. As we target different projects and markets, we will seek to take advantage of our unique delivery capabilities to satisfy demands of the construction industry.

9

 

Products

The Company manufacturesWe manufacture and sellssell the following products:

 

Soft Coat Glass - manufactured by depositing metal particles on the surface of the glass inside a vacuum chamber. This product offers excellent thermal insulation designed to improve energy efficiency of buildings.

Low-e Glass – Low emissivity glass manufactured by depositing metal particles on the surface of the glass inside a vacuum chamber. This product offers excellent thermal insulation designed to improve energy efficiency of buildings.
Laminated/Thermo-Laminated Glass - produced by bonding two glass sheets with an intermediate film in-between. As a safety feature, this product fractures into small pieces if it breaks.
Thermo-Acoustic Glass - manufactured with two or more glass sheets separated by an aluminum or micro-perforated steel profile. This product has a double-seal system that ensures the unit’s tightness, buffering noise and improving thermal control. This product serves as an excellent noise barrier, which is used especially in zones close to airports, traffic or wherever there are unpleasant sounds.
Tempered Glass - glass subject to a tempering process through elevated temperatures resulting in greater superficial elasticity and resistance than conventional glass.
Silk-Screened Glass - special paint is applied to glass using automatic machinery and numerical control, which ensures paint homogeneity and an excellent finish.
Curved Glass - produced by bending a flat glass sheet over a mold, using an automated heat process, which maintains the glass’ physical properties.
Digital Print Glass - digital printing allows any kind of appearance required by the client, offering versatility to projects.
Aluminum products- sold through our Alutions brand includes bars, plates, profiles, rods and tubes used primarily in the manufacture of architectural glass settings including windows, doors, spatial separators and similar products.
Curtain Wall / Floating facades - a non-structural window screen suspended outside a building and are available in many technical specifications for high performance required in high-rise buildings, resistant to strong winds and ensuring high quality standards.
Stick facade systems – glass and aluminum facade elements are fixed to the structure of the building and the glass and spandrel are inserted in the grid on site available in many combinations to define colors, thickness, glass types and finishes, and types of ventilation and design complements.
Windows and Doors - line of window and door products defined by the different types of glass finish, such as normal, impact resistant, hurricane-proof, safety, soundproof and thermal. Additionally, they are available in numerous structures, including fixed body, sliding windows, casement windows, hung windows, sliding doors and swinging doors.
Interior dividers and Commercial display windows - commercial and interior display windows with a broad range of profiles, colors and crystal finishes, as well as bathroom stall dividers, office cubicle separators and closets Products combine functionality, aesthetics and elegance and are available in a broad range of structures and materials.

 

Laminated/Thermo-Laminated Glass - produced by bonding two glass sheets with an intermediate film in-between. As a safety feature, this product fractures into small pieces if it breaks.

Thermo-Acoustic Glass - manufactured with two or more glass sheets separated by an aluminum or micro-perforated steel profile. This product has a double-seal system that ensures the unit’s tightness, buffering noise and improving thermal control. This product serves as an excellent noise barrier, which is used especially in zones close to airports, traffic or wherever there are unpleasant sounds.

Tempered Glass - glass subject to a tempering process through elevated temperatures resulting in greater superficial elasticity and resistance than conventional glass.

Silk-Screened Glass - special paint is applied to glass using automatic machinery and numerical control which ensures paint homogeneity and an excellent finish.

Curved Glass - produced by bending a flat glass sheet over a mold, using an automated heat process, which maintains the glass’ physical properties.

Digital Print Glass - digital printing allows any kind of appearance required by the client, offering versatility to projects.

The Company’s aluminum products sold through its Alutions brand include bars, plates, profiles, rods and tubes used primarily in the manufacture of architectural glass settings including windows, doors, spatial separators and similar products.

Floating facades - act as a window screen hanging outside a building and are available in many technical specifications and profiles to define colors, thickness, glass types and finishes, and types of ventilation and design complements.

Windows and Doors - line of window and door products defined by the different types of glass finish, such as normal, impact resistant, hurricane-proof, safety, soundproof and thermal. Additionally, they are available in numerous structures, including fixed body, sliding windows, projecting windows, guillotine windows, sliding doors and swinging doors.

Commercial display windows - commercial and interior display windows with a broad range of profiles, colors and crystal finishes. Products combine functionality, aesthetics and elegance and are available in a broad range of structures and materials.

Hurricane-proof windows - combine heavy-duty aluminum or vinyl frames with special laminated glass to provide protection from hurricane-force winds up to 180 mph and wind-borne debris by maintaining their structural integrity and preventing penetration by impacting objects.

Automatic doors - exclusive representative in Colombia of Horton Automatics, a manufacturer of automatic doors including glass window systems.

Bathroom dividers - bathroom cubicle division systems, formed by combining glass panels, frames and doors.

Other- polyvinyl structures and other components of architectural systems.

Hurricane-proof windows - combine heavy-duty aluminum or vinyl frames with special laminated glass to provide protection from hurricane-force winds up to 180 mph and wind-borne debris by maintaining their structural integrity and preventing penetration by impacting objects.
Other– awnings, structures, automatic doors and other components of architectural systems.

 

Brands and Trademarks

 

Our main brands includeare Tecnoglass, ES WindowsESWindows and Alutions. Our registered trademarks include “Alutions by Tecnoglass” with the accompanying logo, “ECOMAX by ESWINDOWS”, “Tecnobend”, “Tecnoair”, “ESWINDOWS Interiors”, “ESW Windows and “Alutions”Walls”, “Solartec by Tecnoglass”, “Prestige by ESWINDOWS”, “Eli by ESWINDOWS”, and “Alessia by ESWINDOWS”.

Sales, Marketing and Customer Service

 

Sales and marketingMarketing

 

Our sales strategy primarily focuses on attracting and retaining customers by consistently providing exceptional customer service, leading product quality, and competitive pricing. Our customers also value our shorter lead times, knowledge of building code requirements and technical expertise, which collectively generate significant customer loyalty. Our products are marketed using a combination of internal sales representatives, independent sales representatives and directly to distributors. Our internal sales representatives receive a portion of their performance-based compensation based on sales and profitability metrics. We primarily market our products based on product quality, outstanding service, shorter lead times and on-time delivery.

 

Our products are marketed using a combination of internal sales representatives, independent sales representatives and directly to distributors. We employ abelieve this strategy is highly efficient numberfor our business. Our internal sales representatives receive a portion of in-housetheir performance-based compensation based on sales employees. Mostand profitability metrics. Additionally, some of our sales and marketing efforts are handled by area sales representatives who work on a commission basis.

 

We do not rely on significant traditional advertising expenditures to drive net sales. We have established and maintain credibility primarily through the strength of our products, our customer service and quality assurance, the speed at which we deliver finished products and the attractiveness of our pricing. Our advertising expenditures consist primarily of maintaining our subsidiaries’ websites.

Customer Service

 

We believe that our ability to provide customers outstanding service quality serves as a strong competitive differentiator. Our customer relationships are established and maintained through the coordinated efforts of our sales and production teams. We employ a highly responsive and efficient team of professionals devoted to addressing customer support with the goal of resolving any issue in a timely manner. In order to promote customer loyalty and employee development, we developed ES Windows Universityan employee training program with the primary objectives of training employeeseducating our staff to be aware of client and supplier needs and familiarizing them with our strategic goals in order to improve the competitiveness, productivity and quality of all products offered.

 

Working Capital Requirements

 

Our principalDuring the year ended December 31, 2019, we generated $27.0 million cash from operating activities. Despite the challenge imposed by working capital required to grow sales by 16% year-over-year during 2019, higher profitability coupled with efficient inventorty management allowed such inventories to generate $8.4 million. The main use of cash is related towas trade accounts receivable, which amounted to $26.0used $19.6 million, and $29.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Such use is directly correlated with the company´s ongoing growth and an industry related longer cash cycle. These receivables are often associated to sophisticated, long-lead projects that typically have longer collection periods as distributors also have to collect from end-users, and for that, certain performance conditions must always be met. Additionally, the Company´s strategy continues to include further geographical diversification into more distant markets within the United States, which also may contribute to longer collection cycles. Albeit these factors, the Company doesn’t foresee a deterioration in its ability to collect from its direct or indirect clients (as evidenced by its relatively stableresult of increasing sales, while days sales outstanding relation without accounting for foreign currency translation) and by its very low receivables write-off. The Company continues to focus on ways to improve collection times with some of its most representative clients.

Our inventory requirements are not as significant since our products are made-to-order rather than build-to-stock and as such, inventory levels follow customer orders. During 2016, the Company spent a fair amount of time and resources undertaking “lean manufacturing” best practices with and external consultant and as a result, it was able to better manage inventory levels and improve turnover during the year.

remained relatively stable.

Customers

 

Our customers include architects, building owners, general contractors and glazing subcontractors in the commercial construction market. We have over 9001,000 customers. Of our 100 most representative customers, which represent over 88%83% of our sales, about 52%82% are located in North America, 4%1% in Central America and the Caribbean, and 44%17% in South America. Only oneNo single customer GM&P Consulting and Glazing, accounted for more than 10% or more of our net sales during 2016 and 2015 with 26% and 14% of salesrevenues during the yearyears ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively. On March 1, 2017 the Company entered into and consummated a purchase agreement with Giovanni Monti, the owner of 100% of the outstanding shares of GM&P. With the acquisition of GM&P, the Company has reduced its customer risk concentration and dependence on a single client.2018.

 

Backlog

 

We had a combined outstanding ordersbacklog of $396$541.7 million as of December 31, 2016 as compared to $3752019, and $515 million as of December 31, 2015.2018. We do not believe that backlog is indicative of our future results of operations or prospects. Although we seek commitments from customers well in advance of shipment dates, actual confirmed orders are typically not received until close to the required shipment dates.

 

Materials and Suppliers

 

Our primary manufacturing materials include glass, ionoplast, polyvinyl butyral, and aluminum and vinyl extrusions. Although in some instances we have agreements with our suppliers, these agreements are generally terminable by us or the supplier counterparties on limited notice. Typically, all of our materials are readily available from a number of sources, and no supplier delays or shortages are anticipated.

 

We source raw materials and glass necessary to manufacture our products from a variety of domestic and foreign suppliers. ForDuring the year ended December 31, 2016,2019 three suppliers individually accounted for more than 10% of total raw material purchases, which in aggregate represent 38%represented 37% of raw material purchases. Forpurchases, including Vidrio Andino SAS, from which we purchased 10% of our raw material purchases, and with whom we created a joint venture in March 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2015, no single supplier2018 three suppliers individually accounted for more than 10% of total raw material purchases.purchases, which in aggregate represented 37% of raw material purchases, including Vidrio Andino, from whom we purchased 12%.

 

Warranties

 

We offer product warranties, which we believe are competitive for the markets in which our products are sold. The nature and extent of these warranties depend upon the product. Our standard warranties are generally from five to ten years for architectural glass, curtain wall, laminated and tempered glass, window and door products. Warranties are not priced or sold separately and do not provide the customer with services or coverages in addition to the assurance that the product complies with original agreed-upon specifications. In the event of a claim against a product for which we have received a warranty from the supplier, we transfer the claim back to the supplier.

The Company evaluated historical information regarding claims for replacements undercost associated with product warranties was $2,453and $957 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and concluded that the costs that the Company has incurred in relation to these warranties have not been material.2018, respectively.

Certifications

 

Among our many designations and certifications, Tecnoglass has earned the Miami-Dade County Notice of Acceptance (“NOA”), one of the most demanding certificates in the industry and a requirement to market hurricane-resistant glass in Florida. Tecnoglass’ products comply with Miami-Dade county’s safety code standards as its laminated anti-hurricane glass resists impact, pressure, water and wind. Tecnoglass is also the only company in Latin America authorized by PPG Industries and Guardian Industries to manufacture floating glass facades.

Our subsidiaries have received a number of other certifications from other national and international standard-setting bodies.

 

TG Certifications include:

 

NTC-1578
ASTM E774 1997
ISO 9001: 2008 Certificate of Quality Assurance
ISO 14001: 2004 Certificate of Environmental Management
Safety Glazing Certification Council (SGCC) for tempered and laminated glass: ANZI
Z97 1-2004
International Glass Certification Council (IGCC) for insulated glass: ASTM E774 - 97
Pittsburgh Plate Glass (PPG) certified supplier
Member of ACOLVISE (Colombia Association of Safety Glass Transformers)
OHSAS 18001:2007. Occupational Health and Safety management System

 

ES Certifications include:

 

NTC-ISO 9001: 2008 Certificate of Quality Assurance
NTC-ISO 14001: 2004 Certificate of Environmental Management
Member of the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA)
Complies with Miami-Dade County’s stringent safety code regulations for hurricane-proof windows

 

Competitors

 

We have local and international competitors in Colombia as well as competitorsthat also focus on glass and aluminum transformation, window ensemble and installation and designing in the international marketscommercial and residential construction markets. The market in eachthe United States in which we compete is mainly comprised of manufacturers, distributors and installers of glass curtain walls, windows and doors for commercial and residential buildings. Based on our analysis of IBIS World Report, we estimate that we capture 1% of the glass, aluminumUS consolidated market by revenue (manufacturing and finished products sectors. Glass Tecnología en Vidrios y Ventanas S.A.services), Arquicentro S.A., Aluminum Estructural S.A. and Ventanar Ltda, competewhich represents an attractive opportunity for further penetration. In Colombia, we believe we are the leading producer of high-end windows, with us in the finished products market in Colombia. Apogee Enterprises, Inc., PGT, Inc. and WinDoor Inc. compete with us in the U.S. finished products market. Golden Glass Security, Vid-plex Universal S.A., Aluace Ltda and Laminados y Blindados compete with us locallymore than 35 years of experience in the glass and aluminum markets. Oldcastle, Inc., Trulite Inc.,structure assembly market. The industry has a few well-known players and PRL Glass Systems are among others that compete with us in the U.S. glassis mostly atomized and aluminum products markets.comprised of small competitors.

 

The key factors on which we and our competitors compete for business include: quality, price, and reputation, breadth of products and service offerings, and production speed. We face intense competition from both smaller and larger market players who compete against us in our various markets including glass, window and aluminum manufacturing.

 

The principal methods of competition in the window and door industry are the development of long-term relationships with window and door distributors and dealers, and the retention of customers by delivering a full range of high-quality customized products on demand with short turnaround times while offering competitive pricing. The vertical integration of our operations, our geographic scope, low labor costs and economies of scale have helped our subsidiaries consolidate their leading position in Colombia and bolstered their expansion in the U.S.United States and other foreign markets.

11

 

Government Regulations

 

We are subject to extensive and varied federal, state and local government regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate, including laws and regulations relating to our relationships with our employees, public health and safety and fire codes. Additionally, certain of the jurisdictions in which we operate require that installation of doors and windows be approved by competent authorities that grant distribution licenses. Although our business and facilities are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulation, environmental regulation does not have a material impact on our operations.

Also, we are subject to a potential revision of the United States-Colombia Free Trade Agreement (“USCOFTA”), which allows Colombian entities to export to USA without any tariffs. The President of the United States, Mr. Donald Trump, US President, has made public announcements about the intention to re-negotiate certain terms of free trade agreements, which could potentially implement a tariff. However, the Companywe can mitigate this risk by transferring the price to itsour consumers and diversifying its business operations.

Research and Development

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we spent approximately $2.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, in research and development. The Company incurs in costs related to the development of new products and pays for external tests that need to be performed on our products in order to comply with strict building codes. The Company is fully permitted to commercialize hurricane windows in the Miami-Dade County, Florida, which has one of the most demanding certifications in the world of window frames.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had a total of 5,8535,528 employees, with 3,373 employed by ES, 2,459 employed by Tecnoglass and 21 employed by ESW LLC, none of whom is represented by a union. As of December 31, 2015,2018 we had a total of 5,399 employees, with 3,250 employed by ES, 2,149 employed by Tecnoglass and 20 employed by ESW LLC.5,852 employees. Most of our employees are hired through seven temporary staffing companies and are employed under one-year fixed-term employment contracts. Management believes it has good relations with our employees. We provide ongoing training programs to our employees through the self-established E.S. Windows University.programs.

 

Company History

 

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. We were founded in 2013 in connection with a business combination between Tecnoglass subsidiaries TG and ES, and Andina Acquisition Corporation. TG and ES are corporations formed under the laws of Colombia and founded in 1994 and 1984, respectively, by José M. Daes, our Chief Executive Officer, and Christian T. Daes, our Chief Operating Officer.

Although TG and ES have been in operation since 1994 and 1984, respectively, we were originally formed on September 21, 2011, under the name “Andina Acquisition Corporation” as an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands on September 21, 2011 in order to effect a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities.

In March, 2012, we closed our IPO of 4,200,000 units, with each unit consisting of one ordinary share Tecnoglass changed its name to Tecnoglass Inc. on December 20, 2013 and one warrant to purchase one ordinary share at an exercise price of $8.00 per share, at an offering price of $10.00 per unit, generating total gross proceeds of $42,000,000. Simultaneously with the consummation of the IPO, we consummated a private placement of 4,800,000 warrants (“private warrants”) at a price of $0.50 per warrant and, to the underwriters, options to purchase an aggregate of 900,000 units at a price of $500,100, generating total proceeds of $2,900,100. After deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and the offering expenses, the total net proceeds to us were $43,163,000 of which $42,740,000 was deposited into a trust account. The remaining proceeds of $423,000 became available to be used as working capital to provide for business, legal and accounting due diligence on prospective business combinations and continuing general and administrative expenses. The IPO was conducted pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-178061), that became effective on March 16, 2012.registered under incorporation number 262514.

 

From the consummation of our IPOinitial public offering until August 17, 2013, we were searching for asought out suitable target businessbusinesses to acquire. On August 17, 2013, we entered into an agreement and plan of reorganization, pursuant to which agreement, as amended, we acquiredsometimes refer to as the “business combination agreement,” with Tecnoglass Holding, TecnoglassTG and ES, pursuant to which we acquired TG and ES as direct andwholly-owned indirect subsidiaries. On December 20, 2013, we held an extraordinary general meeting of our shareholders, at which our shareholders approvedsubsidiaries, or the Merger and other related proposals. On the same date, we closed the Merger and Tecnoglass Holding and its indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tecnoglass and ES, became our direct and indirect subsidiaries.

Tecnoglass Holding is a corporation formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands that was founded in 2014 in connection with the Merger. Tecnoglass is a corporation formed under the laws of Colombia that was founded in 1994 by Jose M. Daes, our Chief Executive Officer, and Christian T. Daes, our Chief Operating Officer. ES is a corporation formed under the laws of Colombia that was founded in 1984 by Jose M. Daes and Christian T. Daes.

At the closing ofBusiness Combination. Pursuant to the Business Combination, 2,251,853 of the 4,200,000 public shares sold in our IPO were converted to cash at a conversion price of approximately $10.18 per share, or an aggregate of approximately $22.9 million of the approximately $42.7 million held in the trust account. As consideration for the Business Combination, we issued Energy Holding Corp., a holding companywholly-owned subsidiary was merged with and sole shareholder ofinto Tecnoglass Holding, of which former shareholders of TG and ES were the sole shareholders, an aggregate of 20,567,141 ordinary shares, or approximately 87% of the outstanding ordinary shares. Pursuant to the agreement and plan of reorganization, we also issued to Energywith Tecnoglass Holding Corp. an additional 500,000 ordinary shares upon the achievement of the specified EBITDA targets in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, 1,000,000 ordinary shares upon achievement of the specified EBITDA target in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and 1,500,000 ordinary shares upon the achievement of the specified EBITDA target in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. In connection with the Business Combination, our business became the business of Tecnoglass Holding, TG and ES, and we changed our name to “TecnoglassTecnoglass Inc.” We also changed our fiscal year end from February 28 to December 31 in order to coincide with the fiscal year end of Tecnoglass Holding and its subsidiaries.

In 2014, we established two entities in South Florida, Tecno LLC and Tecno RE, to acquire manufacturing and sales-related assets to support sales and customer service in the United States.

In September 2016, we completed a warrant exchange whereby each warrant holder was given the opportunity to exchange 2.5 outstanding warrants for one ordinary share. As a result of the warrant exchange, 5,479,049 warrants, or 82% of the outstanding warrants were validly tendered. As of September 30, 2016, 1,275,823 warrants remained outstanding following completion of the warrant exchange referenced above. Of these, 1,265,842 warrants were exercised prior to the December 20, 2016 expiration, resulting in the issuance of 478,218 Tecnoglass common shares. The remaining unexercised warrants expired by their own terms on December 20, 2016.

As part of our strategy to vertically integrate our operations, on December 2, 2016 we acquired 100% of the equity of ESW LLC, for a total purchase price of $13.5 million. The acquisition was recorded retroactively starting from the first date of common control. Instead of using fair value, the Company consolidates the financial statements of the entity acquired using the existing carrying values.

As a subsequent event, on March 1, 2017 the Company entered into and consummated a purchase agreement with Giovanni Monti, the owner of 100% of the outstanding shares of GM&P. The Company acquired all of the shares of GM&P for a purchase price of $35 million, of which the Company will pay $6 million of the purchase price in cash within the 60 days following the closing date and the remaining $29 million of the purchase price to be payable on or before September 1, 2017 in cash, our ordinary shares or a combination of both, at our sole option.

Additional Information About the Company

 

We maintain websites for our subsidiaries, TG, ES and ES,GM&P, which can be found atwww.tecnoglass.com,www.energiasolarsa.com, and www.energiasolarsa.com,www.gmpglazing.com, respectively. Although we do not have a website dedicated to Tecnoglass Inc., theThe corporate filings of Tecnoglass Inc., including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statements and reports filed by our executive officers and directors under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, and any amendments to those filings, are available free of charge on the Investor Relations page of each of the subsidiary websites,at investors.tecnoglass.com, which are updateduploaded as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file (or furnish in certain cases) such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and can also be found at the SEC’s website at http://sec.gov. We do not intend for information contained in either subsidiary website,any of our websites, including the Investor Relations pages, to be a part of this Form 10-K. Also, the public may read and copy any materials the Company files with the SEC at the SEC’ public reference room at 100 F St NE, Washington D.C, 20549 or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

 

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (or JOBS Act), and are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. However, we have irrevocably opted not to take advantage of one such exemption which would have allowed us an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. We are, and will continue to be, subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

We could remain an emerging growth company until the last day of our fiscal year following March 22, 2017 (the fifth anniversary of the consummation of our initial public offering). However, if our non-convertible debt issued within a three-year period or our total revenues exceed $1 billion or the market value of our ordinary shares that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million on the last day of the second fiscal quarter of any given fiscal year, we would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following fiscal year.

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

 

Not Applicable.Risks Related to Our Business Operations

 

We operate in competitive markets, and our business could suffer if we are unable to adequately address potential downward pricing pressures and other factors that may reduce operating margins.

The principal markets that we serve are highly competitive. Competition is based primarily on the precision and range of achievable tolerances, quality, price and the ability to meet delivery schedules dictated by customers. Our competition comes from companies of various sizes, some of which have greater financial and other resources than we do and some of which have more established brand names in the markets that we serve. We currently compete with companies such as Viracon (a subsidiary within the Apogee Enterprises Inc. Group), PGT, Cardinal Glass and Oldcastle Glass among others in the United States and companies such as Vitro, Vitelco and others in the Colombia and Latin America. Any of these competitors may foresee the course of market development more accurately than we will, develop products that are superior to ours, have the ability to produce similar products at a lower cost than us or adapt more quickly than we can to new technologies or evolving customer requirements. Increased competition could force us to lower our prices or to offer additional services at a higher cost to us, which could reduce gross profit and net income. Accordingly, we may not be able to adequately address potential downward pricing pressures and other factors, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to maintain the performance, reliability and quality standards required by our customers could have a materially negative impact on our financial condition and results of operation.

If our products or services have performance, reliability or quality problems, or products are installed with incompatible glazing materials, we may experience additional warranty and service expenses, reduced or canceled orders, diminished pricing power, higher manufacturing or installation costs or delays in the collection of accounts receivable. Additionally, performance, reliability or quality claims from our customers, with or without merit, could result in costly and time-consuming litigation that could require significant time and attention of management and involve significant monetary damages that could negatively affect our financial results.

The volatility of the cost of raw materials used to produce our products could materially adversely affect our results of operations in the future.

The cost of raw materials included in our products, including aluminum extrusion and polyvinyl butyral, are subject to significant fluctuations derived from changes in price or volume. A variety of factors over which we have no control, including global demand for aluminum, fluctuations in oil prices, speculation in commodities futures and the creation of new laminates or other products based on new technologies, impact the cost of raw materials which we purchase for the manufacture of our products. We quote our prices of aluminum products based on the price of aluminum in the London Metal Exchange plus a premium, and our suppliers of glass and polyvinyl butyral provide us with price lists that are updated annually, thus reducing the risk of changing prices for orders in the short term. While we may attempt to minimize the risk from severe price fluctuations by entering into aluminum forward contracts to hedge these fluctuations in the purchase price of aluminum extrusion we use in production, substantial, prolonged upward trends in aluminum prices could significantly increase the cost of our aluminum needs and have an adverse impact on our results of operations. If we are not able to pass on significant cost increases to our customers, our results in the future may be negatively affected by a delay between the cost increases and price increases in our products. Accordingly, the price volatility of raw materials could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations in the future.

We depend on third-party suppliers for our raw materials and any failure of such third-party suppliers in providing raw materials could negatively affect our ability to manufacture our products.

Our ability to offer a wide variety of products to our customers depends on receipt of adequate material supplies from manufacturers and other suppliers. It is possible in the future that our competitors or other suppliers may create products based on new technologies that are not available to us or are more effective than our products at surviving hurricane-force winds and wind-borne debris or that they may have access to products of a similar quality at lower prices. Although in some instances we have agreements with our suppliers, these agreements are generally terminable by us or the supplier counterparties on limited notice. We have a fixed set of maximum price rates, and from those prices we negotiate with the supplier of the material depending on the project. We source raw materials and glass necessary to manufacture our products from a variety of domestic and foreign suppliers. During the year ended December 31, 2019, three suppliers individually accounted for more than 10% of total raw material purchases, which in aggregate represent 37% of raw material purchases, including Vidrio Andino SAS, from which we purchased 10% of our raw materials, and with whom we consummated joint venture agreement in May 2019. Failures of third-party suppliers to provide raw materials to us in the future could have an adverse impact on our operating results or our ability to manufacture our products.

We may not realize the anticipated benefit through our joint venture with Saint-Gobain and the planned construction of a new plant as part of the joint venture may not be completed as planned.

We entered into a joint venture agreement with Saint-Gobain and on May 3, 2019, we adquired an approximately 25.8% minority interest in Vidrio Andino’s float glass plant in the outskirts of Bogota, Colombia. We believe this transaction will solidify our vertical integration strategy by acquiring the first stage of our production chain while securing ample glass supply for our expected production needs. However, we may be unable to realize the planned synergies and fail to integrate the facility’s production capacity into our manufacturing process, which may have a negative impact on our financial condition. Additionally, the joint venture agreement includes plans to build a new plant in Galapa, Colombia that will be located approximately 20 miles from our primary manufacturing facility in which we will also have a 25% interest. The new plant will be funded with the original cash contribution made by the Company, operating cashflows from the Bogota plant, debt incurred at the joint venture level that will not consolidate into the Company.

There can be no assurance that the anticipated joint venture cost synergies, increases in capacity or production and optimization of certain manufacturing processes associated with the reduction of raw material waste, and supply chain synergies, including purchasing raw materials at more advantageous prices, will be achieved, or that they might not be significantly and materially less than anticipated, or that the completion of the joint venture with Saint-Gobain will be timely or effectively accomplished. In addition, our ability to realize the anticipated cost synergies and production capacity increases are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control, such as changes to government regulation governing or otherwise impacting our industry, operating difficulties, client preferences, changes in competition and general economic or industry condition.

Constructing a new manufacturing facility involves risks, including financial, construction and governmental approval risks. If Vidrio Andino’s plant fails to produce the anticipated cash flow, if we are unable to allocate the required capital to the new plant, if we are unable to secure the necessary permits, approvals or consents or if we are unable to enter into a contract for the construction of the plant on suitable terms, we will fail to realize the expected benefits of the joint venture.

We may not be able to realize the expected return on our growth and efficiency capital expenditure plan.

On , 2019, we began a $20.2 million growth and efficiency capital expenditure plan meant to enhance operations. We invested $9.9 million in an automated glass sorting and processing system, which increased the capacity of two of our ten production lines by over 160% (or 10% of our total production capacity) while reducing employee headcount, and reduced process lead time. In addition, we currently plan to invest $5.1 million in a vertical paint line and in an additional extrusion press, which we expect to expand our aluminum production capacity in tons by roughly 29%. We also currently intend to invest $5.2 million to create a new automated aluminum warehouse, which we expect will further reduce process lead times in the assembly of our curtain wall systems.

There can be no assurance that the anticipated cost saving initiatives will be achieved, or that they will not be significantly and materially less than anticipated, or that the completion of such cost savings initiatives will be effectively accomplished. In addition, our ability to realize the anticipated cost savings are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control, such as changes to government regulation governing or otherwise impacting our industry, operating difficulties, client preferences, changes in competition and general economic or industry condition. If we fail to realize the anticipated cost savings it could have a negative impact on our financial position.

The home building industry and the home repair and remodeling sector are regulated and any increased regulatory restrictions could negatively affect our sales and results of operations.

The home building industry and the home repair and remodeling sector are subject to various local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, building design and safety, hurricane and floods, construction, and similar matters, including regulations that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can be built within the boundaries of a particular area. Increased regulatory restrictions could limit demand for new homes and home repair and remodeling products, which could negatively affect our sales and results of operations. We may not be able to satisfy any future regulations, which consequently could have a negative effect on our sales and results of operations.

Changes in building codes could lower the demand for our impact-resistant windows and doors.

The market for our impact-resistant windows and doors depends in large part on our ability to satisfy state and local building codes that require protection from wind-borne debris. If the standards in such building codes are raised, we may not be able to meet such requirements, and demand for our products could decline. Conversely, if the standards in such building codes are lowered or are not enforced in certain areas, demand for impact-resistant products may decrease. If we are unable to satisfy future regulations, including building code standards, it could negatively affect our sales and results of operations. Further, if states and regions that are affected by hurricanes but do not currently have such building codes fail to adopt and enforce hurricane protection building codes, our ability to expand our business in such markets may be limited.

Equipment failures, delays in deliveries and catastrophic loss at our manufacturing facility could lead to production curtailments or shutdowns that prevent us from producing our products.

An interruption in production capabilities at any of our facilities because of equipment failure or other reasons could result in our inability to produce our products, which would reduce our sales and earnings for the affected period. In addition, we generally manufacture our products only after receiving the order from the customer and thus do not hold large inventories. If there is a stoppage in production at our manufacturing facilities, even if only temporarily, or if they experience delays because of events that are beyond our control, delivery times could be severely affected. Any significant delay in deliveries to our customers could lead to increased product returns or cancellations and cause us to lose future sales. Our manufacturing facilities are also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events such as fires, explosions or violent weather conditions. If we experience plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production because of equipment failure, delays in deliveries or catastrophic loss, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Further, we may not have adequate insurance to compensate for all losses that result from any of these events.

Our reliance on a single facility subjects us to concentrated risks.

We currently operate the vast majority of our business from a single production facility in Barranquilla, Colombia. Due to the lack of diversification in our assets and geographic location, an adverse development at or impacting our facility or in local or regional economic or political conditions, could have a significantly greater impact on our results of operations and financial condition than if we maintained more diverse assets and locations. While we implement preventative and proactive maintenance at our facility, it is possible that we could experience prolonged periods of reduced production and increased maintenance and repair costs due to equipment failures. In addition, because of our single facility and location, in certain cases we rely on limited or single suppliers for significant inputs, such as electricity. We are also reliant on the adequacy of the local skilled labor force to support our operations. Supply interruptions to or labor shortages or stoppages at our facility could be caused by any of the aforementioned factors, many of which are beyond our control, and would adversely affect our operations and we would not have any ability to offset this concentrated impact with activities at any alternative facilities or locations.

Our business involves complex manufacturing processes that may cause personal injury or property damage, subjecting us to liabilities and possible losses other disruptions of our operations in the future, which may not be covered by insurance.

Our business involves complex manufacturing processes. Some of these processes involve high pressures, temperatures, hot metal and other hazards that present certain safety risks to workers employed at our manufacturing facilities. The potential exists for accidents involving death or serious injury. Although our management is highly committed to health and safety, since January 2014, two fatalities have occurred at our operations. The potential liability resulting from any such accident, to the extent not covered by insurance, could result in unexpected cash expenditures, thereby reducing the cash available to operate our business. Such an accident could disrupt operations at any of our facilities, which could adversely affect our ability to deliver products to our customers on a timely basis and to retain our current business.

Operating hazards inherent in our business, some of which may be outside of our control, can cause personal injury and loss of life, damage to or destruction of property, plant and equipment and environmental damage. We maintain insurance coverage in amounts and against the risks we believe are consistent with industry practice, but this insurance may not be adequate or available to cover all losses or liabilities we may incur in our operations. Our insurance policies are subject to varying levels of deductibles. Losses up to our deductible amounts accrue based upon our estimates of the ultimate liability for claims incurred and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported. However, liabilities subject to insurance are difficult to estimate due to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination of our liability in proportion to other parties, the number of incidents not reported and the effectiveness of our safety programs. If we were to experience insurance claims or costs above our estimates, we might also be required to use working capital to satisfy these claims.

Our results may not match our provided guidance or the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which likely would have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.

Our results may fall below provided guidance and the expectations of securities analysts or investors in future periods. Our results may vary depending on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, fluctuating customer demand, delay or timing of shipments, construction delays or cancellations due to lack of financing for construction projects or market acceptance of new products. Manufacturing or operational difficulties that may arise due to quality control, capacity utilization of our production equipment or staffing requirements may also adversely affect annual net sales and operating results. Moreover, where we participate in fixed-price contracts for installation services, changes in timing of construction projects or difficulties or errors in their execution caused by us or other parties, could result in a failure to achieve expected results. In addition, competition, including new entrants into our markets, the introduction of new products by competitors, adoption of improved technologies by competitors and competitive pressures on prices of products and services, could adversely affect our results. Finally, our results may vary depending on raw material pricing, the potential for disruption of supply and changes in legislation that could have an adverse impact on labor or other costs. Our failure to meet our provided guidance or the expectations of securities analysts or investors would likely adversely affect the market price of our securities.

If new construction levels and repair and remodeling markets decline, such market pressures could negatively affect our results of operations.

The architectural glass industry is subject to the cyclical market pressures of the larger new construction and repair and remodeling markets. In turn, these larger markets may be affected by adverse changes in economic conditions such as demographic trends, employment levels, interest rates, commodity prices, availability of credit and consumer confidence, as well as by changing needs and trends in the markets, such as shifts in customers’ preferences and architectural trends. Any future downturn or any other negative market pressures could negatively affect our results of operations in the future, as margins may decrease as a direct result of an overall decrease in demand for our products. Additionally, we may have idle capacity which may have a negative effect on our cost structure.

We may be adversely affected by disruptions to our manufacturing facilities or disruptions to our customer, supplier or employee base.

Any disruption to our facilities resulting from weather-related events, fire, an act of terrorism or any other cause could damage a significant portion of our inventory, affect our distribution of products and materially impair our ability to distribute products to customers. We could incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with distributing our products to customers during the time that it takes for us to reopen or replace a damaged facility. In addition, if there are disruptions to our customer and supplier base or to our employees caused by weather-related events, acts of terrorism or any other cause, our business could be temporarily adversely affected by higher costs for materials, increased shipping and storage costs, increased labor costs, increased absentee rates and scheduling issues. Any interruption in the production or delivery of our supplies could reduce sales of our products and increase costs.

Customer concentration and related credit, commercial and legal risk may adversely impact our future earnings and cash flows.

Our ten largest third-party customers worldwide collectively accounted for 41% of our total sales revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019, though no single customer accounted for more than 10% of annual revenues. We also do not have any long-term requirements contracts pursuant to which we would be required to fulfill customers on an as-needed basis.

Although the customary terms of our arrangements with customers in Latin America and the Caribbean typically require a significant upfront payment ranging between 30% and 50% of the cost of an order, if a large customer were to experience financial difficulty, or file for bankruptcy or similar protection, or if we were unable to collect amounts due from customers that are currently under bankruptcy or similar protection, it could adversely impact our results of operations, cash flows and asset valuations. Therefore, the risk we face in doing business with these customers may increase. Financial problems experienced by our customers could result in the impairment of our assets, a decrease in our operating cash flows and may also reduce or curtail our customers’ future use of our products and services, which may have an adverse effect on our revenues.

Disagreements between the parties can arise as a result of the scope and nature of the relationship and ongoing negotiations. Although we do not have any disputes with any major customers as of the date hereof that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, we cannot predict whether such disputes will arise in the future.

The nature of our business exposes each of our subsidiaries to product liability and warranty claims that, if adversely determined, could negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations and the confidence of customers in our products.

Our subsidiaries are, from time to time, involved in product liability and product warranty claims relating to the products they manufacture and distribute that, if adversely determined, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, they may be exposed to potential claims arising from the conduct of homebuilders and home remodelers and their sub-contractors. We may not be able to maintain insurance on acceptable terms or insurance may not provide adequate protection against potential liabilities in the future. Product liability claims can be expensive to defend and can divert the attention of management and other personnel for significant periods, regardless of the ultimate outcome. Claims of this nature could also have a negative impact on customer confidence in our products and us. We are not aware of any such claims at this time.

We are subject to potential exposure to environmental liabilities and are subject to environmental regulation and any such liabilities or regulation may negatively affect our costs and results of operations in the future.

Our subsidiaries are subject to various national, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations that are frequently changing and becoming more stringent. Although we believe that our facilities are materially in compliance with such laws, ordinances and regulations, we cannot be certain that we will, at all times, be able to maintain compliance. Furthermore, as owners of real property, our subsidiaries can be held liable for the investigation or remediation of contamination on such properties, in some circumstances, without regard to whether we knew of or were responsible for such contamination. Remediation may be required in the future because of spills or releases of petroleum products or hazardous substances, the discovery of unknown environmental conditions, or more stringent standards regarding existing residual contamination. Environmental regulatory requirements may become more burdensome, increase our general and administrative costs, and increase the risk that our subsidiaries incur fines or penalties or be held liable for violations of such regulatory requirements.

Weather can materially affect our business and we are subject to seasonality.

Seasonal changes and other weather-related conditions can adversely affect our business and operations through a decline in both the use and production of our products and demand for our services. Adverse weather conditions, such as extended rainy and cold weather in the spring and fall, can reduce demand for our products and reduce sales or render our distribution operations less efficient. Major weather events such as hurricanes, tornadoes, tropical storms and heavy snows with quick rainy melts could adversely affect sales in the near term.

Construction materials production and shipment levels follow activity in the construction industry, which typically occurs in the spring, summer and fall. Warmer and drier weather during the second and third quarters typically result in higher activity and revenue levels during those quarters. The first quarter typically has lower levels of activity partially due to inclement weather conditions. The activity level during the second quarter varies greatly with variations in temperature and precipitation.

Our success depends upon our ability to develop new products and services, integrate acquired products and services and enhance existing products and services through product development initiatives and technological advances; any failure to make such improvements could harm our future business and prospects.

We have continuing programs designed to develop new products and to enhance and improve our existing products. We are expending resources for the development of new products in all aspects of our business, including products that can reach a broader customer base. Some of these new products must be developed due to changes in legislative, regulatory or industry requirements or in competitive technologies that render certain of our existing products obsolete or less competitive. The successful development of our products and product enhancements are subject to numerous risks, both known and unknown, including unanticipated delays, access to significant capital, budget overruns, technical problems and other difficulties that could result in the abandonment or substantial change in the design, development and commercialization of these new products. The events could have a materially adverse impact on our results of operations.

Given the uncertainties inherent with product development and introduction, including lack of market acceptance, we cannot provide assurance that any of our product development efforts will be successful on a timely basis or within budget, if at all. Failure to develop new products and product enhancements on a timely basis or within budget could harm our business and prospects. In addition, we may not be able to achieve the technological advances necessary for us to remain competitive, which could have a materially negative impact on our financial condition.

We are dependent on sales to customers outside Colombia and any failure to make these sales may adversely affect our operating results in the future.

In the year ended December 31, 2019, 88% of our sales were to customers outside Colombia, including to the United States and Panama, and we expect sales into the United States and other foreign markets to continue to represent a significant portion of our net sales. Foreign sales and operations are subject to changes in local government regulations and policies, including those related to tariffs and trade barriers, investments, property ownership rights, taxation, exchange controls and repatriation of earnings. An increase in tariffs on products shipped to countries like the United States, which President Trump has indicated is possible, or changes in the relative values of currencies occur from time to time and could affect our operating results. This risk and the other risks inherent in foreign sales and operations could adversely affect our operating results in the future.

We are dependent on certain key personnel, the loss of whom could materially affect our financial performance and prospects in the future.

Our continued success depends largely upon the continued services of our senior management and certain key employees. Each member of our senior management teams has substantial experience and expertise in his or her industry and has made significant contributions to our growth and success. We face the risk, however, that members of our senior management may not continue in their current positions and the loss of the services of any of these individuals could cause us to lose customers and reduce our net sales, lead to employee morale problems and the loss of other key employees or cause disruptions to production. In addition, we may be unable to find qualified individuals to replace any senior executive officers who leave our employ or that of our subsidiaries.

We are subject to labor, and health and safety regulations, and may be exposed to liabilities and potential costs for lack of compliance.

We are subject to labor, and health and safety laws and regulations that govern, among other things, the relationship between us and our employees, and the health and safety of our employees. If an adverse final decision that we violated any labor or health and safety laws, we may be exposed to penalties and sanctions, including the payment of fines. In particular, most of our employees are hired through temporary staffing companies and are employed under one-year fixed-term employment contracts. According to applicable labor law regarding temporary staffing companies, if we exceed the limits for hiring temporary employees and the Colombian Ministry of Labor identifies the existence of illegal outsourcing, sanctions may be imposed along with probable lawsuits by employees claiming the existence of a labor relationship. Our subsidiaries could also be subject to work stoppages or closure of operations.

The above, notwithstanding cancellation or suspension of governmental registrations, authorizations and licenses issued by other authorities, any one of which may result in interruption or discontinuity of business, and, could, consequently, materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operation.

Our results of operations could be significantly affected by foreign currency fluctuations and currency regulations.

We are subject to risks relating to fluctuations in currency exchange rates that may affect our sales, cost of sales, operating margins and cash flows. During the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 12% of our revenues and 29% of our expenses were in Colombian pesos. The remainder of our expenses and revenues were denominated, priced and realized in U.S. dollars. In the future, and especially as we further expand our sales in other markets, our customers may increasingly make payments in non-U.S. currencies. In addition, currency devaluation can result in a loss to us if we hold monetary assets in that currency. Hedging foreign currencies can be difficult and costly, especially if the currency is not actively traded. We cannot predict the effect of future exchange rate fluctuations on our operating results.

In addition, we are subject to risks relating to governmental regulation of foreign currency, which may limit our ability to:

transfer funds from or convert currencies in certain countries;
repatriate foreign currency received in excess of local currency requirements; and
repatriate funds held by foreign subsidiaries to the United States at favorable tax rates.

Furthermore, the Colombian government and the Colombian Central Bank intervene in the country’s economy and occasionally make significant changes in monetary, fiscal and regulatory policy, which may include the following measures:

controls on capital flows;
international investments and exchange regime.

For a more detailed description of foreign exchange regulations in Colombia, see “Disclosure Regarding Foreign Exchange Rates in Colombia” and “Risk factors – Risks Related to Colombia and Other Countries Where We Operate – The Colombian government and the Central Bank exercise significant influence on the Colombian economy”.

As we continue to increase our operations in foreign countries, there is an increased risk that foreign currency controls may create difficulty in repatriating profits from foreign countries in the form of taxes or other restrictions, which could restrict our cash flow.

We have entered into significant transactions with affiliates or other related parties, which may result in conflicts of interest.

We have entered into transactions with affiliates or other related parties in the past and may do so again in the future. While we believe such transactions have been and will continue to be negotiated on an arm’s length basis, giving us a competitive advantage with vertical integration, there can be no assurance that such transactions could not give rise to conflicts of interest that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The interests of our controlling shareholders could differ from the interests of our other shareholders.

Energy Holding Corporation exercises significant influence over us as a result of its majority shareholder position and voting rights. As of December 31, 2019, Energy Holding Corporation beneficially owned approximately 56.6% of our outstanding ordinary shares. Energy Holding Corporation, in turn, is controlled by members of the Daes family, who together own 100% of the shares of Energy Holding Corporation. See “Principal Securityholders.” Accordingly, our controlling shareholders would have considerable influence regarding the outcome of any transaction that requires shareholder approval. In addition, if we are unable to obtain requisite approvals from Energy Holding Corporation, we may be prevented from executing critical elements of our business strategy.

We conduct all of our operations through our subsidiaries, and will rely on payments from our subsidiaries to meet all of our obligations and may fail to meet our obligations if our subsidiaries are unable to make payments to us.

We are a holding company and derive substantially all of our operating income from our subsidiaries. All of our assets are held by our subsidiaries, and we rely on the earnings and cash flows of our subsidiaries to meet our debt service obligations or dividend payments. The ability of our subsidiaries to make payments to us will depend on their respective operating results and may be restricted by, among other things, the laws of their jurisdiction of organization including Colombian foreign exchange regulations (which may limit the amount of funds available for distributions to us), the terms of existing and future indebtedness and other agreements of our subsidiaries, including their credit facilities, and the covenants of any future outstanding indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur. See “Disclosure Regarding Foreign Exchange Rates in Colombia” and “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Colombia and Other Countries Where We Operate – The Colombian government and the Central Bank exercise significant influence on the Colombian economy.” If our subsidiaries are unable to declare dividends, our ability to meet debt service or dividend payments may be impacted. The ability of our subsidiaries in Colombia to declare dividends up to the total amount of their capital is not restricted by current laws, covenants in debt agreements or other agreements but could be restricted pursuant to applicable law in the future or if our Colombian subsidiaries undergo a transformation to other types of corporate entities.

We may be adversely affected by any disruption in our information technology systems. Our operations are dependent upon our information technology systems, which encompass all of our major business functions.

Increased global information technology security requirements, vulnerabilities, threats and a rise in sophisticated and targeted cybercrime pose a risk to the security of our systems, our information networks, and to the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data, including our intellectual property, proprietary business information, and personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, as well as to the functionality of our manufacturing process. A disruption in our information technology systems for any prolonged period, whether caused by cybercrime or telecommunications failures, natural disasters, or other problems, could result in delays in executing certain production activities, logging and processing operational and financial data, communication with employees and third parties or fulfilling customer orders, or the loss or misappropriation of customer information, resulting in potential liability, regulatory actions, or reputational damage or otherwise adversely affect our financial results. We employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats, which include employee education, password encryption, frequent password change events, firewall detection systems, anti-virus software in-place and frequent backups; however, there is no guarantee such efforts will be successful in preventing a cyber-attack or disruption in our information technology systems from telecommunication failures, natural disasters, or other problems.

We rely on third party transportation, which subjects us to risks and costs that we cannot control, and which risks and costs may materially adversely affect our operations.

We rely on third party trucking companies to transport raw materials to the manufacturing facilities used by each of our businesses and, to a lesser degree, to ship finished products to customers. These transport operations are subject to various hazards and risks, including extreme weather conditions, work stoppages and operating hazards, as well as interstate transportation regulations. In addition, the methods of transportation we utilize may be subject to additional, more stringent and more costly regulations in the future. If we are delayed or unable to ship finished products or unable to obtain raw materials as a result of any such new regulations or public policy changes related to transportation safety, or these transportation companies fail to operate properly, or if there were significant changes in the cost of these services due to new or additional regulations, or otherwise, we may not be able to arrange efficient alternatives and timely means to obtain raw materials or ship goods, which could result in a material adverse effect on our revenues and costs of operations. Transportation costs represent a significant part of our cost structure. If our transportation costs increased substantially, due to prolonged increases in fuel prices or otherwise, we may not be able to control them or pass the increased costs onto customers, and our profitability would be negatively impacted.

The success of our business depends, in part, on our ability to execute on our acquisition strategy, to successfully integrate acquisitions and to retain key employees of our acquired businesses.

A significant portion of our historical growth has occurred through acquisitions and we will likely enter into acquisitions in the future. We may at any time be engaged in discussions or negotiations with respect to possible acquisitions, including transactions that would be significant to us. We regularly make, and we expect to continue to make, acquisition proposals, and we may enter into letters of intent for acquisitions. We cannot predict the timing of any contemplated transactions. To successfully finance such acquisitions, we may need to raise additional equity capital and indebtedness, which could increase our leverage level above our leverage level. We cannot assure you that we will enter into definitive agreements with respect to any contemplated transactions or that transactions contemplated by any definitive agreements will be completed on time or at all. Our growth has placed, and will continue to place, significant demands on our management and operational and financial resources. Acquisitions involve risks that the businesses acquired will not perform as expected and that business judgments concerning the value, strengths and weaknesses of acquired businesses will prove incorrect.

Acquisitions may require integration of acquired companies’ sales and marketing, distribution, purchasing, finance and administrative organizations, as well as exposure to different legal and regulatory regimes in jurisdictions in which we have not previously operated. We may not be able to integrate successfully any business we may acquire or have acquired into our existing business, and any acquired businesses may not be profitable or as profitable as we had expected. Our inability to complete the integration of new businesses in a timely and orderly manner could increase costs and lower profits. Factors affecting the successful integration of acquired businesses include, but are not limited to, the following:

We may become liable for certain liabilities of any acquired business, whether or not known to us. These risks could include, among others, tax liabilities, product liabilities, asbestos liabilities, environmental liabilities, pension liabilities and liabilities for employment practices and they could be significant.
Substantial attention from our senior management and the management of the acquired business may be required, which could decrease the time that they have to service and attract customers.
The complete integration of acquired companies depends, to a certain extent, on the full implementation of our financial systems and policies.
We may actively pursue a number of opportunities simultaneously and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, complications and delays, including difficulties in employing sufficient staff and maintaining operational and management oversight.

Increasing interest rates could materially adversely affect our ability to generate positive cashflows and secure financing required to carry out our strategic plans.

Historically, portions of our debt have been indexed to variable interest rates. A variety of factors over which we have no control. A rise in interest rates could negatively impact the cost of financing for a portion of our debt with variable interest rates which could negatively impact our cash flow generation. Furthermore, a rise in interest rates could limit our ability to obtain financing required to support our growth through our continuing programs designed to develop new products, the expand of the installed capacity of our manufacturing facilities and execute our acquisition strategy. While we may mitigate the risk derived from interest rate fluctuations by entering into derivative contracts or by obtaining fixed rate financing, general increases in interest rates would still have an impact on the cost of financing and our ability to obtain appropriate funding.

Furthermore, the architectural glass industry is directly impacted by general construction activity trends. In turn, these markets may be affected by adverse changes in economic conditions such as interest rates, and availability of credit. Any future downturn or any other negative market pressures could negatively affect our results of operations in the future, as margins may decrease as a direct result of an overall decrease in demand for our products.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations.

As of December 31, 2019, we and our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis had $259.8 million principal amount of USD denominated debt outstanding. Our indebtedness could have negative consequences to our financial health. For example, it could:

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the notes of our other debt;
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions or a downturn in our business;
require us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations to debt service, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are not as highly leveraged;
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds; and
result in an event of default if we fail to satisfy our obligations under the notes or our other debt or fail to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in the indenture or our other debt instruments, which event of default could result in all of our debt becoming immediately due and payable and could permit certain of our lenders to foreclose on our assets securing such debt.

Any of the above listed factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, the terms of our existing debt agreements do not, and any future debt may not, fully prohibit us from incurring additional debt. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

Risks Related to Colombia and Other Countries Where We Operate

Our operations are located in Colombia, which may make it more difficult for U.S. investors to understand and predict how changing market and economic conditions will affect our financial results.

Our operations are located in Colombia and, consequently, are subject to the economic, political and tax conditions prevalent in that country. The economic conditions in Colombia are subject to different growth expectations, market weaknesses and business practices than economic conditions in the U.S. market. We may not be able to predict how changing market conditions in Colombia will affect our financial results.

As of the date of this annual report, Colombia’s long-term foreign currency sovereign credit ratings were affirmed “Baa2” by Moody’s, “BBB-” by S&P and “BBB” by Fitch, three of the main rating agencies worldwide. The stable outlook reflects their expectation that Colombia’s established political institutions and track record of consensus on key economic policies will contribute to economic stability and continuity over the coming two to three years. Real GDP growth in Colombia is expected to accelerate in 2020 as private consumption and investment drive economic activity and industrial production and exports rebound.

Colombia’s economy, just like most of Latin-American countries, continues suffering from the effects of lower commodity prices, mainly oil, reflected in its elevated level of external debt. Even though the country has taken measures to stabilize the economy, it is uncertain how will these measures be perceived and if the intended goal of increasing investor’s confidence will be achieved.

Economic and political conditions in Colombia may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our financial condition and results of operations depend significantly on macroeconomic and political conditions prevailing in Colombia. Decreases in the growth rate, periods of negative growth, increases in inflation, changes in law, regulation, policy, or future judicial rulings and interpretations of policies involving exchange controls and other matters such as (but not limited to) currency depreciation, foreign exchange regulations, inflation, interest rates, taxation, employment and labor laws, banking laws and regulations and other political or economic developments in or affecting Colombia may affect the overall business environment and may, in turn, adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations in the future. Colombia’s fiscal deficit and growing public debt could adversely affect the Colombian economy. See “Disclosure Regarding Foreign Exchange Rates in Colombia” and “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Colombia and Other Countries Where We Operate – The Colombian government and the Central Bank exercise significant influence on the Colombian economy”.

The Colombian government frequently intervenes in Colombia’s economy and from time to time makes significant changes in monetary, fiscal and regulatory policy. Our business and results of operations or financial condition may be adversely affected by changes in government or fiscal policies, and other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments that may affect Colombia. We cannot predict what policies the Colombian government will adopt and whether those policies would have a negative impact on the Colombian economy or on our business and financial performance in the future. We cannot assure you as to whether current stability in the Colombian economy will be sustained. If the conditions of the Colombian economy were to deteriorate, our financial conditions and results of operations would be adversely affected.

The Colombian government has historically exercised substantial influence on the local economy, and governmental policies are likely to continue to have an important effect on companies operating in Colombia like our Colombian subsidiaries, market conditions and the prices of the securities of local issuers. The President of Colombia has considerable power to determine governmental policies and actions relating to the economy and may adopt policies that may negatively affect us. We cannot predict which policies will be adopted by the new government and whether those policies would have a negative impact on the Colombian economy in which we operate or our business and financial performance.

The Colombian Government and the Central Bank exercise significant influence on the Colombian economy.

Although the Colombian government has not imposed foreign exchange restrictions since 1990, Colombia’s foreign currency markets have historically been extremely regulated. Colombian law permits the Central Bank to impose foreign exchange controls to regulate the remittance of dividends and/or foreign investments in the event that the foreign currency reserves of the Central Bank fall below a level equal to the value of three months of imports of goods and services into Colombia. An intervention that precludes our Colombian subsidiaries from possessing, utilizing or remitting U.S. Dollars would impair our financial condition and results of operations, and would impair the Colombian subsidiary’s ability to convert any dividend payments to U.S. dollars.

The Colombian government and the Central Bank may also seek to implement new policies aimed at controlling further fluctuation of the Colombian peso against the U.S. dollar and fostering domestic price stability. The Central Bank may impose certain mandatory deposit requirements in connection with foreign-currency denominated loans obtained by Colombian residents, including TG and ES. We cannot predict or control future actions by the Central Bank in respect of such deposit requirements, which may involve the establishment of a different mandatory deposit percentage. The U.S. dollar/Colombian peso exchange rate has shown some instability in recent years. Please see “Disclosure Regarding Foreign Exchange Controls and Exchange Rates in Colombia” for actions the Central Bank could take to intervene in the exchange market.

The Colombian Government has considerable power to shape the Colombian economy and, consequently, affect the operations and financial performance of businesses. The Colombian Government may seek to implement new policies aimed at controlling further fluctuation of the Colombian peso against the U.S. dollar and fostering domestic price stability. The president of Colombia has considerable power to determine governmental policies and actions relating to the economy and may adopt policies that are inconsistent with those of the prior government or that negatively affect us.

26

Factors such as Colombia’s growing public debt and fluctuating exchange rates could adversely affect the Colombian economy.

Colombia’s fiscal deficit and growing public debt could adversely affect the Colombian economy. The fiscal rules imposed on the Colombian government the need to reduce the fiscal deficit from 2.7% of GDP in 2019 to 2.3% of GDP in 2020, respectively, and have thereby prevented the Colombian government from taking counter-cyclical measures to stimulate the economy

Although the country has gone through three tax reforms in the last five years, the Colombian government continues to face serious budgetary constraints and pressure from rating agencies that could lead to future tax reforms, with potential adverse consequences on our financial results.

In recent years, the Colombian currency had shown some short-term volatility vis-à-vis the U.S. dollar, despite only depreciating by less than by 1% in 2019 and 9.3% in 2018. Any international conflicts or related events have the potential to create an exchange mismatch, given the vulnerability and dependence of the Colombian economy on external financing and its vulnerability to any disruption in its external capital flows and its trade balance.

We cannot assure you that any measures taken by the Colombian government and the Central Bank would be sufficient to control any resulting fiscal or exchange imbalances. Any further disruption in Colombia’s fiscal and trade balance may therefore cause Colombia’s economy to deteriorate and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to regional and national economic conditions in the United States.

The economy in Florida and throughout the United States could negatively impact demand for our products as it has in the past, and macroeconomic forces such as employment rates and the availability of credit could have an adverse effect on our sales and results of operations. Our U.S. business is concentrated geographically in Florida, which optimizes manufacturing efficiencies and logistics, but further concentrates our business, and another prolonged decline in the economy of the state of Florida or of nearby coastal regions, a change in state and local building code requirements for hurricane protection, or any other adverse condition in the state or certain coastal regions, could cause a decline in the demand for our products, which could have an adverse impact on our sales and results of operations. Our strategy of continued geographic diversification seeks to reduce our exposure to such region-specific risks.

Economic instability in Colombia could negatively affect our ability to sell our products.

A significant decline in economic growth of any of Colombia’s major trading partners - in particular, the United States, China, and Mexico - could have a material adverse effect on each country’s balance of trade and economic growth. In addition, a “contagion” effect, where an entire region or class of investments becomes less attractive to, or subject to outflows of funds by, international investors could negatively affect the Colombian economy.

The 2008 global economic and financial crisis, which began in the U.S. financial system and spread to different economic sectors and countries around the world, had negative effects on the Colombian economy. During 2009, the economies of the United States and most major European countries contracted, which, in turn, affected the Colombian economy. The economic recovery in the United States since 2013 has been fragile and at lower rates than in the past recoveries. Several European Union countries have been obliged to severely reduce their public expenditures due to their high indebtedness, which has severely affected the Eurozone’s economic growth. The ability of governments and companies in certain countries, such as Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain to repay their debt obligations or remain in the euro currency system remains uncertain. In addition, certain events, such as the outbreak of civil and political unrest in several countries in Africa and the Middle East, including, Libya, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, might further strain and adversely affect the global economy and the global financial system.

Due to financial and economic crises that may occur in countries around the world and recent turmoil in emerging markets economies, such as Turkey, South Africa and Argentina, investors may view investments in emerging markets with heightened caution. As a result of such financial and economic crises, flows of investments into Colombia may be reduced. Crises in other countries may hamper investors’ enthusiasm for securities of Colombian issuers, which may, in turn, adversely affect market prices for the Securities and make it difficult for us to access the international capital markets and finance its operations and capital expenditures.

Even though exports from Colombia, principally petroleum and petroleum products, and gold, have grown in recent years, fluctuations in commodity prices pose a significant challenge to their contribution to the country’s balance of payments and fiscal revenues. Unemployment continues to be high in Colombia compared to other economies in Latin America. Furthermore, recent political and economic actions in the Latin American region, including actions taken by the Argentine and Venezuelan governments, may negatively affect international investor perception of the region. We cannot assure you that growth achieved over the past decade by the Colombian economy will continue in future periods. The long-term effects of the global economic and financial crisis on the international financial system remain uncertain. In addition, the effect on consumer confidence of any actual or perceived deterioration of household incomes in the Colombian economy may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Global trade tensions and political conditions in the United States, as well as the U.S. government’s approach to NAFTA and/or other trade agreements, treaties or policies, may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our operations are located in Colombia and may be, to varying degrees, affected by economic and market conditions in other countries. Trade barriers being erected by major economies may limit our ability to sell products in other markets and execute our growth strategies. Economic conditions in Colombia are correlated with economic conditions in the United States. As a result, any downturn in economic activity, could have a negative impact on our business in the United States, which at the year ended December 31, 2019, accounted for 85% of our net operating revenues.

In 2018, the United States levied a steel and aluminum tariff under which certain aluminum products we manufacture in Colombia are subject to a 10% tariff. Most of our imports to the United States of assembled architectural systems are not subject to the tariff, however our extruded aluminum products are subject to this tariff. The tariff resulted in an expense of $1.7 million as of the end of the latest reportable period at December 31, 2019. For the time being, the burden of this tax is being passed on to our clients through increased sales prices.

Additionally, the U.S. government has indicated its intent to alter its approach to international trade policy and in some cases to renegotiate, or potentially terminate, certain existing bilateral or multi-lateral trade agreements and treaties with foreign countries. If the U.S. government takes action to materially modify the United States-Colombia Free Trade Agreement, or USCOFTA, it has the potential to adversely impact our business by increasing the costs of selling our product into the U.S. market. As such, if the United States withdraws from or negotiates material modifications to the terms of USCOFTA, such actions could materially adversely affect our sales, financial results and cash flows.

The termination or re-negotiation of free trade agreements or other related events could also indirectly have an adverse effect on the Colombian economy. Although economic conditions in other emerging market countries and in the United States may differ significantly from economic conditions in Colombia, investors’ reactions to developments in other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Colombian companies. There can be no assurance that future developments in other emerging market countries and in the United States, over which we have no control, will not have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.

Colombia has experienced and continues to experience internal security issues that have had or could have a negative effect on the Colombian economy and our financial condition.

Colombia has experienced and continues to experience internal security issues, primarily due to the activities of guerrilla groups, such as dissidents from the former Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, or “FARC”) and the National Liberation Army (Ejercito de Liberación Nacional, or “ELN,”) paramilitary groups and drug cartels. In remote regions of the country with minimal governmental presence, these groups have exerted influence over the local population and funded their activities by protecting, and rendering services to, drug traffickers. Even though the Colombian government’s policies have reduced guerilla presence and criminal activity, particularly in the form of terrorist attacks, homicides, kidnappings and extortion, such activity persists in Colombia, and possible escalation of such activity and the effects associated with them have had and may have in the future a negative effect on the Colombian economy and on us, including on our customers, employees, results of operations and financial condition. The Colombian government commenced peace talks with the FARC in August 2012, and peace negotiations with the ELN began in November 2016. The Colombian government and the FARC signed a peace deal on September 26, 2016, which was amended after voters rejected it in the referendum held on October 2, 2016. The new agreement was signed on November 24, 2016 and was ratified by the Colombian Congress on November 30, 2016 and is being implemented after four years of negotiations. Pursuant to the peace agreements negotiated between the FARC and the Colombian government in 2016, the FARC occupies five seats in the Colombian Senate and five seats in the Colombian House of Representatives. The new deal clarifies protection to private property, is expected to increase the government’s presence in rural areas and bans former rebels from running for office in certain newly created congressional districts in post-conflict zones. As a result, during the transition process, Colombia may experience an increase in internal security issues, drug-related crime and guerilla and paramilitary activities, which may have a negative impact on the Colombian economy. Our business or financial condition could be adversely affected by rapidly changing economic or social conditions, including the Colombian government’s response to implementation of the agreement with FARC and ongoing peace negotiations, if any, which may result in legislation that increases the tax burden of Colombian companies.

Despite efforts by the Colombian government, drug-related crime, guerrilla paramilitary activity and criminal bands continue to exist in Colombia, and allegations have surfaced regarding members of the Colombian congress and other government officials having ties to guerilla and paramilitary groups. Although the Colombian government and ELN have been in talks since February 2017 to end a five-decade war, the Colombian government has suspended the negotiations after a series of rebel attacks... This situation could result in escalated violence by the ELN and may have a negative impact on the credibility of the Colombian government which could in turn have a negative impact on the Colombian economy.

Tensions with neighboring countries, including Venezuela and other Latin American countries may affect the Colombian economy and, consequently, our results of operations and financial condition in the future.

Diplomatic relations with Venezuela, and neighboring countries, have from time to time been tense and affected by events surrounding the Colombian armed forces, particularly on Colombia’s borders with Venezuela. Political tensions in Venezuela have risen in January 2019 as a number of countries, including Colombia, have not recognized the legitimacy of Nicolás Maduro as Venezuelan head of state. In addition, on January 25, 2019, President Trump signed an Executive Order amending prior economic sanctions targeting the Maduro government. Moreover, in November 2012, the International Court of Justice placed a sizeable area of the Caribbean Sea within Nicaragua’s exclusive economic zone. Until then, Colombia had deemed this area as part of its own exclusive economic zone. Any future deterioration in relations with Venezuela and Nicaragua may result in the closing of borders, risk of financial condition.

Government policies and actions, and judicial decisions, in Colombia could significantly affect the local economy and, as a result, our results of operations and financial condition in the future.

Our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by changes in Colombian governmental policies and actions, and judicial decisions, involving a broad range of matters, including interest rates, exchange rates, exchange controls, inflation rates, taxation, banking and pension fund regulations and other political or economic developments affecting Colombia. The Colombian government has historically exercised substantial influence over the economy, and its policies are likely to continue to have a significant effect on Colombian companies, including our subsidiaries. The President of Colombia has considerable power to determine governmental policies and actions relating to the economy, and may adopt policies that negatively affect our subsidiaries. Future governmental policies and actions, or judicial decisions, could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

We are subject to money laundering and terrorism financing risks.

Third parties may use us as a conduit for money laundering or terrorism financing. If we were to be associated with money laundering (including illegal cash operations) or terrorism financing, our reputation could suffer or we could be subject to legal enforcement (including being added to “blacklists” that would prohibit certain parties from engaging in transactions with us). Our Colombian subsidiaries could also be sanctioned pursuant to criminal anti-money laundering rules in Colombia.

We have adopted a Compliance Manual which includes policies and procedures. However, such measures, procedures and compliance may not be completely effective in preventing third parties from using us as a conduit for money laundering or terrorism financing without our knowledge, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in Colombia’s customs, import and export laws and foreign policy, may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business depends significantly on Colombia’s customs and foreign exchange laws and regulations, including import and export laws, as well as on fiscal and foreign policies. In the past we have benefited from, and now currently benefit from, certain customs and tax benefits granted by Colombian laws, such as free trade zones and Plan Vallejo which incentivizes the import of machinery and equipment by providing tax breaks, as well as from Colombian foreign policy, such as free trade agreements with countries like the United States. As a result, our business and results of operations or financial condition may be adversely affected by changes in government or fiscal policies, foreign policy or customs and foreign exchange laws and regulations. We cannot predict what policies the Colombian government will adopt and whether those policies would have a negative impact on the Colombian economy or on our business and financial performance in the future.

It may be difficult or impossible to enforce judgments of courts of the United States and other jurisdictions against our Colombian subsidiaries or any of their directors, officers and controlling persons.

Most of our assets are located in Colombia. As such, it may be difficult or impossible for you to effect service of process on, or to enforce judgments of United States courts against our Colombian subsidiaries and/or against their directors and officers based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.

Colombian courts will enforce a U.S. judgment predicated on the U.S. securities laws through a procedural system known under Colombian law asexequatur. Colombian courts will enforce a foreign judgment, without reconsideration of the merits, only if the judgment satisfies the requirements set out in Articles 605 through 607 of Law 1564 of 2012, or the Colombian General Code of Procedure (Código General del Proceso), which provides that the foreign judgment will be enforced if certain conditions are met.

New or higher taxes resulting from changes in tax regulations or the interpretation thereof in Colombia could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition in the future.

New tax laws and regulations, and uncertainties with respect to future tax policies pose risks to us. In recent years, the Colombian Congress approved different tax reforms imposing additional taxes and enacted modifications to existing taxes related to financial transactions, dividends, income, value added tax (VAT), and taxes on net worth.

On December 28, 2018, a tax reform was implemented by means of Law 1943 intended to strengthen the mechanisms to prevent tax evasion, reduce corporate taxes, and encourage investment and economic growth and introduced other substantial changes to the then-existing tax legal framework. As a result, the corporate income tax rate decreased to 33% for fiscal year 2019, 32% for fiscal year 2020, 31% for fiscal year 2021 and 30% for fiscal year 2022. Law 1943 also includes increased withholding tax rates resulting from payments made to foreign entities to a general rate of 20% (from the current 15%), however this general rate does not apply to foreign indebtedness exceeding one year, in which case the applicable income tax withholding remains at 15%. In October 2019, the Colombian Constitutional Court revoked the 2018 tax reform law based on certain procedural flaws during its enactment. Later, on December 27, 2019, a tax reform was enacted by means of Law 2010 which was based on the 2018 Law 1943.

Changes in tax-related laws and regulations, and interpretations thereof, can create additional tax burdens on us and our businesses by increasing tax rates and fees, creating new taxes, limiting tax deductions, and/or eliminating tax-based incentives and non-taxed income. In addition, tax authorities and competent courts may interpret tax regulations differently than us, which could result in tax litigation and associated costs and penalties in part due to the novelty and complexity of new regulation.

30

We are subject to various U.S. export controls and trade and economic sanctions laws and regulations that could impair our ability to compete in international markets and subject us to liability if we are not in full compliance with applicable laws.

Our business activities are subject to various U.S. export controls and trade and economic sanctions laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the U.S. Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations and the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control’s (“OFAC”) trade and economic sanctions programs (collectively, “Trade Controls”). Such Trade Controls may prohibit or restrict our ability to, directly or indirectly, conduct activities or dealings in or with certain countries that are the subject of comprehensive embargoes (presently, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, and the Crimea region of Ukraine (collectively, “Sanctioned Countries”)), as well as with individuals or entities that are the target of Trade Controls-related prohibitions and restrictions (collectively, “Sanctioned Parties”).

Although we have implemented compliance measures designed to prevent transactions with Sanctioned Countries and Sanctioned Parties, our failure to successfully comply with applicable Trade Controls may expose us to negative legal and business consequences, including civil or criminal penalties, government investigations, and reputational harm.

Natural disasters in Colombia could disrupt our business and affect our results of operations and financial condition in the future.

Our operations are exposed to natural disasters in Colombia, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tornadoes, tropical storms and hurricanes. Heavy rains in Colombia, attributable in part to the La Niña weather pattern, have resulted in severe flooding and mudslides. La Niña is a recurring weather phenomenon, and it may contribute to flooding, mudslides or other natural disasters on an equal or greater scale in the future. In the event of a natural disaster, our disaster recovery plans may prove to be ineffective, which could have a material adverse effect on its ability to conduct our businesses. In addition, if a significant number of our employees and senior managers were unavailable because of a natural disaster, our ability to conduct our businesses could be compromised. Natural disasters or similar events could also result in substantial volatility in our results of operations for any fiscal quarter or year.

Risks Related to Us and Our Securities

On December 20, 2019 the Company’s shareholders approved the delisting of the Company’s ordinary shares from the Colombian Securities Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de Colombia, “BVC”), and your ability to trade your shares of the Company through this secondary market may be limited.

Our board of directors has proposed and our shareholders have approved the delisting of the Company’s ordinary shares from the BVC. After delisting from the BVC, the ordinary shares will continue to trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”).

The Colombia stock listing is secondary to our primary listing on Nasdaq, which will serve as the exclusive exchange to transact Tecnoglass ordinary shares upon completion of the delisting from the Colombia Stock Exchange. With over 99% of Tecnoglass shares traded on Nasdaq over the past year, the delisting of secondary trading on the BVC is expected to save on expenses, time and administrative resources associated with the Company’s listing on a secondary exchange.

We have requested authorization to delist from the Colombian Superintendence of Finance, which is the regulatory authority that needs to approve the delisting. We will maintain our listing on BVC during at least the six (6) months following the publication of the authorization to delist issued by the Colombian Superintendence of Finance, which will be disclosed by the Company to the local public with the periodicity and content defined by the Superintendence. Additionally, we will maintain a mechanism that allows local shareholders to dispose of their shares in Nasdaq for at least six (6) months thereafter.

31

Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, you may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. Federal courts may be limited.

We are a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and substantially all of our assets are located outside the United States. In addition, a majority of our directors and officers are nationals or residents of jurisdictions other than the United States and all or substantial portions of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon our directors or executive officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against our directors or officers.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our third amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Law (2018 Revision) of the Cayman Islands (as the same may be supplemented or amended from time to time) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are largely governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are different from what they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder’s derivative action in a Federal court of the United States.

We have been advised by our Cayman Islands legal counsel, Maples and Calder, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any State; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any State, so far as the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, impeachable on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a manner, and or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere. There is recent Privy Council authority (which is binding on the Cayman Islands Court) in the context of a reorganization plan approved by the New York Bankruptcy Court which suggests that due to the universal nature of bankruptcy/insolvency proceedings, foreign money judgments obtained in foreign bankruptcy/insolvency proceedings may be enforced without applying the principles outlined above. However, a more recent English Supreme Court authority (which is highly persuasive but not binding on the Cayman Islands Court), has expressly rejected that approach in the context of a default judgment obtained in an adversary proceeding brought in the New York Bankruptcy Court by the receivers of the bankruptcy debtor against a third party, and which would not have been enforceable upon the application of the traditional common law principles summarized above and held that foreign money judgments obtained in bankruptcy/insolvency proceedings should be enforced by applying the principles set out above, and not by the simple exercise of the Courts’ discretion. Those cases have now been considered by the Cayman Islands Court. The Cayman Islands Court was not asked to consider the specific question of whether a judgment of a bankruptcy court in an adversary proceeding would be enforceable in the Cayman Islands, but it did endorse the need for active assistance of overseas bankruptcy proceedings. We understand that the Cayman Islands Court’s decision in that case has been appealed and it remains the case that the law regarding the enforcement of bankruptcy/insolvency related judgments is still in a state of uncertainty.

If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements could be impaired, which could adversely affect our business.

Our financial reporting obligations as a public company place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources, and systems. We may not be able to implement effective internal controls and procedures to detect and prevent errors in our financial reports, file our financial reports on a timely basis in compliance with SEC requirements, or prevent and detect fraud. Our management may not be able to respond adequately to changing regulatory compliance and reporting requirements. We are both a “smaller reporting company” and an “accelerated filer” as defined under Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company.” If we are not able to adequately implement the requirements of Section 404, we may not be able to assess whether internal controls over financial reporting are effective, which may subject us to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence, the market price of our ordinary shares and our ability to raise additional capital.

Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Cayman Islands law may discourage or prevent a change of control, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our shareholders, which could depress the price of our ordinary shares and prevent attempts by our shareholders to replace or remove our current management.

Our memorandum and articles of association contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that shareholders may consider to be in their best interests. Our board of directors is divided into three classes with staggered, three year terms. Our board of directors has the ability to designate the terms of and issue preferred shares without shareholder approval. We are also subject to certain provisions under Cayman Islands law that could delay or prevent a change of control. Together these provisions may make more difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our ordinary shares. See “Description of Share Capital.”

We are a “controlled company,” controlled by Energy Holding Corp., whose interest in our business may be different from ours or yours.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq Capital Market listing standards. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, including (i) the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (ii) the requirement that we have a nominating and corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities and (iii) the requirement that we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities. Although we meet the definition of a “controlled company,” we have determined at this time not to take advantage of this designation and comply with all the corporate governance rules applicable to listed companies that are not controlled companies. We may, however, determine to take advantage of these exemptions in the future. If we did, you would not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market.

We cannot assure you that we will continue to pay dividends on our ordinary shares, and our indebtedness, future investments or cashflow generation could limit our ability to continue to pay dividends on our ordinary shares.

Prior to August 2016, we had not paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares. Since such time, we have paid regular quarterly dividends. However, the payment of any future dividends will be solely at the discretion of our Board of Directors and there can be no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends in the future.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade our stock or our sector, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

33

The trading market for our ordinary shares relies in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control these analysts. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who do cover us downgrade our stock or our industry, or the stock of any of our competitors, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

If a United States person is treated as owning at least 10% of the value or voting power of our shares, such holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

If a United States person is treated as owning (directly, indirectly or constructively) at least 10% of the value or voting power of our shares, such person may be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” in our group (if any). While our parent company owns one or more U.S. subsidiaries, we, and certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries, could be treated as controlled foreign corporations. Furthermore, while our group includes one or more U.S. subsidiaries, certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries could be treated as controlled foreign corporations (regardless of whether or not we are treated as a controlled foreign corporation). A United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation generally is required to report annually and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangible low-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property by controlled foreign corporations, regardless of whether we make any such United States shareholder receives any actual distributions. An individual that is a United States shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a United States shareholder that is a U.S. corporation. Failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject a United States shareholder to significant monetary penalties and may prevent the statute of limitations with respect to such shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax return for the year for which reporting was due from starting. We cannot provide any assurances that we will assist investors in determining whether any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are treated as a controlled foreign corporation or whether any investor is treated as a United States shareholder with respect to any of such controlled foreign corporations or furnish to any United States shareholders information that may be necessary to comply with the aforementioned reporting and tax paying obligations. There is substantial uncertainty as to the application of each of the foregoing rules as well as the determination of any relevant calculations in applying the foregoing rules. United States persons are strongly advised to avoid acquiring, directly, indirectly or constructively, 10% or more of the value or voting power of our shares. A United States investor should consult its advisors regarding the potential application of these rules to an investment in the ordinary shares.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

 

Not Applicable.None.

Item 2.Properties.

 

We own and operate a 2.7 million square foot manufacturing complex located in Barranquilla, Colombia. This manufacturing campus houses a glass production plant, aluminum plant and window and facade assembly plant. The glass plant has foureight lamination machines with independent assembly rooms, sixten specialized tempering furnaces and glass molding furnaces, a computer numerical-controlled profile bending machine, as well as five silk-screening machines.a coater to produce low emissivity glass with high thermal insulation specifications using soft coat technology. The Alutions plant has an effective installed capacity of 1,0002,100 tons per month and can create a variety of shapes and forms for windows, doors and related products. We also own threesix natural gas power generation plants with aan aggregate capacity of 1,750 kilowatts each10 megawatts which supply the electricity requirements of the entire manufacturing complex and are supported by three emergency generators.

In December 2014, we acquired We also own and operate a 123,399 square foot manufacturing and warehousing facility in a 215,908 square foot lot size in Miami-Dade County, Florida, United States. The facility houses manufacturing and assembly equipment, warehouse space, and administrative and sales offices.

During the first week of July 2016, TG paid $10.5 million to acquire a lot adjacent to the Company’s facilities to expand the manufacturing facilities.

 

We believe that our existing properties are adequate for the current operating requirements of our business and that additional space will be available as needed.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

 

On March 2, 2016 ES filed a lawsuit against Bagatelos Architectural Glass Systems, Inc. (“Bagatelos”)From time to time, the Company is involved in Colombia. In addition, we also filed a lawsuit against Bagateloslegal matters arising in the Stateregular course of California for breach of contract. To lift the lien declared by the Court in California, Bagatelos submitted a bond for $2.0 million in favor of ESbusiness. Some disputes are derived directly from our construction projects, related to supply and its release isinstallation, and even though deemed ordinary, they may involve significant monetary damages. We are also subject to other type of litigation arising from employment practices, worker’s compensation, automobile claims and general liability. It is very difficult to predict precisely what the court’s ruling. This bond isoutcome of this litigation might be. However, with the information at our disposition as this time, there are no indications that such claims will result in a “mechanics lien surety bond” which guarantees ES paymentmaterial adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the amounts due with interest and costs should the Company win the case. Mediation scheduled for February 17, 2017 was unsuccessful and parties continue discovery. Bagatelos as defendant presented a cross complaint on September 23, 2016 seeking damages of approximately $3 million. Although we already received a payment order from the Colombian judge, the Company continues to pursue its rights, remedies and defenses in the U.S. We received on January 31, 2017 a case update from our U.S. counsel stating that due to ES’ favorable terms and conditions and the fact that Bagatelos has overstated their claim and ignored their contractual duties, it is probable that the Company will be able to recover the outstanding amount of $2.0 million.Company.

 

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not Applicable.

PART II

 

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

 

Market Information

 

Our ordinary shares are listed on the NASDAQ Capital MarketNasdaq under the symbol TGLS.“TGLS”. Effective January 6, 2016, the Company’s shares also commenced trading on the Bolsa de Valores de Colombia (“BVC”), the principal stock exchange of Colombia, under the symbol TGLSC. The listing of the Company’s shares on the BVC is secondary to the primary listing on Nasdaq.

On December 20, 2019, the NASDAQ Market. No newCompany’s shareholders approved the deslisting of the Company’s ordinary shares werefrom BVC. Pursuant to this approval, the Company has requested authorization to delist from the Colombian Superintendence of Finance, which is the regulating authority that needs to approve the delisting. We will maintain our listing on BVC during at least the six (6) months following the publication of the authorization to delist issued in connectionby the Colombian Superintendence of Finance, which will be disclosed by the Company to the local public with the admissionperiodicity and content defined by the Superintendence. Additionally, we will maintain a mechanism that allows local shareholders to trading on the BVC.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales pricesdispose of their shares in Nasdaq for our ordinary shares for the periods indicated below and starting from the first quarter of 2015.

  Ordinary
Shares
 
Period High  Low 
       
Fiscal 2017:        
First Quarter* $12.34  $11.40 
         
Fiscal 2016:        
Fourth Quarter $12.70  $10.87 
Third Quarter $12.93  $10.20 
Second Quarter $12.49  $10.25 
First Quarter $14.30  $9.82 
         
Fiscal 2015:        
Fourth Quarter $15.59  $13.05 
Third Quarter $15.95  $12.39 
Second Quarter $13.74  $8.50 
First Quarter $10.73  $9.16 

* Through March 1, 2017.at least six (6) months thereafter

 

Holders

 

As of December 31, 2016,2019, there were 339340 holders of record of our ordinary shares. We believe our ordinary shares are held by more than 3,000 beneficial owners.

 

Dividends

 

InPrior to August 2016, the Company’swe had not paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares. On August 4, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized the payment of four regular quarterly dividends to holders of our ordinary shares at a quarterly rate of $0.125 per share or(or $0.50 per share on an annual basis. The first quarterly dividend was paid on November 1, 2016, to shareholdersbasis). Our Board of record date September 23, 2016. The dividend was declared to be paidDirectors subsequently authorized an increase in the formdividends to $0.14 per share (or $0.56 per share on an annual basis) beginning in the third quarter of 2017 and going forward. The dividends have been paid in cash or ordinary shares, at the option of record date shareholdersholders of ordinary shares during an election period. The value of the ordinary shares used to calculate the number of shares issued with respect to that portion of the dividend payable in ordinary shares was the average of the closing price of our ordinary shares on Nasdaq during a set period. If no choice was made during the election period, which ended October 14, 2016. Approximately 20%the dividend was paid in ordinary shares.

The payment of any future dividends will be solely at the discretion of our Board of Directors and there can be no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends in the future. Our bond indenture currently restricts the type of dividend we can make while the bonds are outstanding. See “Description of Indebtedness” below for further information. The payment of dividends in the future, if any, will therefore also be contingent upon limitations imposed by our outstanding indebtedness.

Because we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends depends on our receipt of cash dividends from our operating subsidiaries, which may further restrict our ability to pay dividends as a result of the laws of their jurisdictions of organization, agreements of our subsidiaries or 6.32 million shares, opted for cash distributions withcovenants under any existing and future outstanding indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur. The ability of our subsidiaries in Colombia to declare dividends up to the remainder receiving stock distributions aggregating to ordinary shares totaling 275,049 sharestotal amount of their capital is not restricted by current laws, covenants in an aggregate.On February 1, 2017, the Company issued 306,579 ordinary shares and paid $564 in connection with the second quarterly dividend.debt agreements or other agreements.

 

Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliates

 

No purchases of our equity securities have been made by us or affiliated purchasers within the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

Information about our equity compensation plans

Information required by Item 5 of Form 10K regarding equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

 

Not Applicable.applicable.

 

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements included in this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements and Introduction” in this Form 10-K.

 

Overview

 

We are a holdingvertically-integrated manufacturer, supplier and installer of architectural glass, windows and associated aluminum products for the global commercial and residential construction markets. With a focus on innovation, combined with providing highly specified products with the highest quality standards at competitive prices, we have developed a leadership position in each of our core markets. In the United States, which is our largest market, we were ranked as the second largest glass fabricator in 2019 by Glass Magazine. In addition, we believe we are the leading glass transformation company operating throughin Colombia. Our customers, which include developers, general contractors or installers for hotels, office buildings, shopping centers, airports, universities, hospitals and multi-family and residential buildings, look to us as a value-added partner based on our wholly-owned subsidiaries: TG, which manufactures, transforms, marketsproduct development capabilities, our high quality products and exportsour unwavering commitment to exceptional service.

We have more than 35 years of experience in architectural glass and aluminum profile structure assembly. We transform a variety of glass products, since 1994including tempered safety, double thermo-acoustic and established the Alutions plantlaminated glass. Our finished glass products are installed in 2007 fora wide variety of buildings across a number of different applications, including floating facades, curtain walls, windows, doors, handrails, and interior and bathroom spatial dividers. We also produce aluminum products such as profiles, rods, bars, plates and ES, a leaderother hardware used in the productionmanufacturing of high-end windows and architectural glass systems. We have more than 30 years’ experience in the glass and aluminum structure assembly market in Colombia.windows.

 

We manufacture hi-specification architectural glass and windows for the global residential and commercial construction industries. Currently we offer design, production, marketing, and installation of architectural systems for buildings of high, medium and low elevation size. Products include windows and doorsOur products are manufactured in glass and aluminum, floating façades, office partitions and interior divisions, and commercial window showcases.

In recent years, we have expanded our US sales outside of the Florida market, entering into high-tech markets for curtain walls, obtaining a niche market2.7 million square foot, state-of-the-art manufacturing complex in Barranquilla, Colombia that provides easy access since this product is in high demand and marks a new trend in architecture. This product is a very sophisticated product and therefore garners high margins for us. These products involve high performance materials that are produced by Alutions and TG with state of the art technology.

ES sells products in Panama primarily to companies participating in large construction projects in the most exclusive areas of the city. For example, ES products were supplied in the construction of the tallest building inNorth, Central and South America, The Point, as well as in the constructionCaribbean and the Pacific. Our products can be found on some of the most modern hotelsdistinctive buildings in these regions including El Dorado Airport (Bogota), Via 57 West (New York), Brickel Flatiron (Miami), and Salesforce Tower (San Francisco). Our track record of successfully delivering high profile projects has earned us an increasing number of opportunities across the United States, evidenced by our expanding backlog and overall revenue growth.

Our structural competitive advantage is underpinned by our low-cost manufacturing footprint, vertically integrated business model and geographic location. Our integrated facilities in Colombia and distribution and services operations in Florida provide us with a significant cost advantage in both manufacturing and distribution, and we continue to invest in these operations to expand our operational capabilities. Our lower cost manufacturing footprint allows us to offer competitive prices for our customers, while also providing innovative, high quality and high value-added products, together with consistent and reliable service. We have historically generated high margin organic growth based on our position as a value-added solutions provider for our customers.

We have a strong presence in the region such as Megapolis. Based on ES’s knowledgeFlorida market, which represents a substantial portion of our revenue stream and backlog. Our success in Florida has primarily been achieved through sustained organic growth, with further penetration now taking place into other highly populated areas of the construction market in Central America, ES products were suppliedUnited States.

As part of our strategy to become a fully vertically integrated company, we have supplemented our organic growth with some recent acquisitions that have allowed us added control over our supply chain, allowed for further vertical integration of our business and will act as a platform for our future expansion in the Soho Plaza,United States. In 2016, we completed the acquisition of ESW, which gave us control over the distribution of products into the United States from our manufacturing facilities in Colombia. In 2017, we completed the acquisition of GM&P, a complex.consulting and glazing installation business that was previously our largest installation customer. These acquisitions allowed for further vertical integration of our business and will act as a platform for our future expansion in the United States. And on May 3, 2019, we consummated the joint venture agreement with Saint-Gobain, acquiring a 25.8% minority ownership interest in Vidrio Andino, a Colombia-based subsidiary of Saint-Gobain, solidifying our vertical integration strategy by acquiring an interest in the first stage of our production chain, while securing ample glass supply for our expected production needs.

The continued diversification of the group’s presence and product portfolio is a core component of our strategy. In particular, we are actively seeking to expand our presence in United States outside of Florida. We also launched a residential windows offering which, we believe, will help us expand our presence in the United States and generate additional organic growth. We believe that the quality of our products, coupled with our ability to price competitively given our structural advantages on cost, will allow us to generate further growth in the future.

 

How We Generate Revenue

 

The Company isWe are a leading manufacturer of hi-spec architectural glass and windows for the western hemisphere residential and commercial construction industries, operating through our direct and indirect subsidiaries. Headquartered in Barranquilla, Colombia, we operate out of a 2.7 million square foot vertically-integrated, state-of-the-art manufacturing complex that provides easy access to the Americas,North, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and the Pacific.

 

The Company’Our glass products include tempered glass, laminated glass, thermo-acoustic glass, curved glass, silk-screened glass, and digital print glass as well as mill finished, anodized, painted aluminum profiles and produces rods, tubes, bars and plates. Window production lines are defined depending on the different types of windows: normal, impact resistant, hurricane-proof, safety, soundproof and thermal. The Company producesWe produce fixed body, sliding windows, projecting windows, guillotine windows, sliding doors and swinging doors. ES produces façadefacade products which include: floating facades, automatic doors, bathroom dividers and commercial display windows.

 

The Company sellsWe sell to over 9001,000 customers using several sales teams based out of Colombia and the United States to specifically target regional markets in South, Central and North America. The United States accounted for approximately 62%85%, and 59%80% of our combined revenues in 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively, while Colombia accounted for approximately 32%12% and 34%17%, and Panama accounted for approximately 3%1% and 3% of our combined revenues1% in those years, respectively. Our tailored, high-end products are found on some of the world’s most distinctive properties, including the 50 UN Plaza (New York), UB Law (Baltimore) Fordham University Law School (New York), Soho Mall (Panama), Brickell City Centre (Miami), Wesleyan (Houston) and the El Dorado Airport (Bogota).

 

The Company sells itsWe sell our products through fourour main offices/sales teams based out of Colombia Panama and the US.United States. The Colombia sales team is our largest sales group, which has deep contacts throughout the construction industry. The Colombia sales team markets both the Company’sour products as well as our installation services. The Peruvian office is responsible for South American sales, excluding Colombia.In the United States, we sell out of subsidiaries established in Florida, which have an expanding customer base and provide installation service in addition to our products. Sales forces in Panama are not via subsidiaries but under agreements with sales representatives. The Company hasWe have two types of sales operations: Contract sales, which are the high-dollar, specifically-tailored customer projects;tailored projects, and standard form sales. Standard Form Sales.form sales reflect low-value installations that are of short duration.

In Colombia,We expect to benefit from growth in both of our largest markets, the overall economy has slowed down as a direct resultUnited States and Colombia. One indicator of the downturnnon-residential construction outlook in the commodity’s cycle. That being said, certain sectorsUnited States, the Architectural Billing Index, has generally pointed towards an improved construction outlook since late 2012 and reached 52.5 as of December 2019; any score above 50 indicates increase in billing, pointing toward expansion. Construction for nonresidential construction activity in the economy have been growing above the overall averageUnited States is projected to grow 1.5% in 2020 and contributing to current GDP growth which for the 2016 is estimated at a range between 2.0% and 2.8% (based on several sources that include de FMI and the Colombian Central Bank). The principal sectors that continue to evidence positive results are mainly related0.9% in 2021, according to the company’s manufacturing, infrastructure and construction activities. In relation toAIA Consensus Construction Forecast. Additionally, since 2018 we are actively seeking business in the construction industry, both commercial andU.S. residential construction activity has been growing at a steady pace during the last years; the Company’s results in Colombia will be directly impacted by the level of residential and commercial construction going forward as a significant proportion of our revenuesmarket. Residential housing starts are expected to continue being derived from local sales.

The U.S. market represents approximately 60% of our overall sales andincrease by 6% during 2020 according to Evercore ISI research. Over the five years to 2024, the industry is expectedprojected to continue being our most important market going forward. The U.S. construction market is currently experiencingexpanding, albeit at a growth cycle as evidenced by the ABI (“Architectural Billing Index”) as of November 2016, and is showing expansion in the main sub-markets where Tecnoglass operates (mainly Florida, Texas and the Northeast Region). Our strategy going forward will be to continue to focus on the U.S. as our main geographical target given its significant size and business activity. The recent acquisition of ESW and GM&P reinforces this strategy. See the “Overview” section in Item 1 of this Form 10-K. Within the U.S., Tecnoglass is seeking to continue diversifying its presence across a broader footprint in order to mitigate its concentration risk, while searching for new partnerships and commercial relationships in large metropolitan areas otherslower pace than those in Florida (where it has historically had a strong market position). Our relationshipduring the current period. We believe our United States business will grow with distributors, installers and general contractors continue to be key in our market penetration strategy and in our sales efficiency in order to target a broad variety of end clients. Construction activity in both the commercial and the residential markets within the U.S. has a direct impact in our ability to grow sales and profit margins. Although our efficient cost structure enables us to better withstand fluctuations and cyclesthis increase in construction activity, our overall results could be significantly correlated with such cycles.

As part of our strategy to vertically integrate our operations, on December 2, 2016 we acquired 100% of the stock of ESW LLC. Since 2004, we have a strategic commercial relationship with ESW LLC, a Florida-based company partially owned by Christian T. Daes and José M. Daes, who are also our executive officers and directors, up onto recent acquisition. ESW LLC acts as one of ES’s importers and distributors in the U.S. and is a member of the American Architectural Manufacturers Association, a technical information center for the architecture industry with highest standards. ESW LLC sends project specifications and orders from its clients to ES, and in turn, receives pricing quotes from ES which are conveyed to the client.

As a subsequent event, on March 1, 2017 the Company entered into and consummated a purchase agreement with Giovanni Monti, the owner of 100% of the outstanding shares of GM&P. GM&P is a consulting and glazing contracting company located in Miami, Florida with over 15 years of experience in the design and installation of various building enclosure systems such as curtain window walls and a long-standing commercial relationship with the Company, working alongside it in different projects within the U.S, by providing engineering and installation services to those projects.

spending.‎

 

Liquidity

 

As of December 31, 20162019, and 2015, the Company2018, we had cash and cash equivalentequivalents of approximately $26.9$47.9 million and $22.7$33.0 million, respectively.

On January 7, 2016, we entered into a $109.5 million, seven-year senior secured credit facility. Proceeds from the new facility were used to refinance $83.5 million of existing debt, with the remaining $26.0 million available to the Company for capital expenditures and working capital needs. Approximately $51.6 million of the new facility were used to refinance current borrowings into long term debt. The Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 reflects the effect of this refinance of the Company’s current portion of long term debt and other current borrowings into long term debt based on the Company’s intent as of that date. The new facility features two tranches, including one tranche denominated in USD representing 71% of the facility and another tranche denominated in Colombian Pesos (COP) representing the remaining 29%. Borrowings under the facility will bear interest at a weighted average interest rate of 7% for the first year, and thereafter at a rate of LIBOR plus 5.25% and DTF (Colombian index) plus 5.00% for the respective USD and COP denominated tranches.

During the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162019, the main sources of cash were derived from our cashflow from operations and 2015, $3.1an underwritten follow-on public offering of 5,551,423 ordinary shares, including the underwriters’ over-allotment option, for net proceeds of $36.5 million, and $2.5proceeds from a $29.5 million were used in and provided by operating activities, respectively. A discussion of our cash flow from operations is was includedlong-term syndicate loan facility further described below in the sub-section headedunder “Cash flowFlow from Operations, Investing and Financing Activities” under. While operating cashflow supported strong growth during the Results of Operation section of this management discussion and analysis.period, proceeds from the equity issuance were used to finance our joint venture with Saint-Gobain.

 

On January 23, 2017, the Company successfully issued a U.S. dollar denominated, $210 million offering of 5-year senior unsecured notes at a coupon rate of 8.2% in the international debt capital markets under Rule 144A of the Securities Act to qualified institutional investors. The Company will use approximately $179 million of the proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness and as a result will achieve a lower cost of debt and strengthen its capital structure given the non-amortizing structure of the new bond. The Company’s consolidated balance sheet asAs of December 31, 2016 reflects2019, the effectCompany had $57.3 million of borrowings available under several facilities with relationship banks, as most of the outstanding balances under such lines were repaid with the long-term syndicate loan facility issued in April of this refinance of the Company’s current portion of long term debt and other current borrowings into long term debt based on the Company’s intent as of that date.year.

 

Capital Resources

 

We transform glass and aluminum into high specification architectural glass and custom-made aluminum profiles which requiresrequire significant investments in state of the art technology. During the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, we made investments primarily in building and construction, and machinery and equipment in the amountamounts of $42.7$26.2 million, and $80.2$13.6 million, respectively.

In August 2014,

On May 3, 2019, we entered intoconsummated a contract to purchase equipment from Magnetron Sputter Vacuum Deposition to produce soft coated low emissivityjoint venture agreement with Saint-Gobain, a world leader in the production of float glass, as parta key component of our improvements plan that entered productionmanufacturing process, whereby we acquirred a 25.8% minority ownership interest in Vidrio Andino, a Colombia-based subsidiary of Saint-Gobain. The purchase price for our interest in Vidrio Andino was $45 million, of wich $34.1 million was paid in cash and $10.9 million to be paid through the contribution of land to be contributed on our behalf by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, José M. Daes and Christian T. Daes by the first quarter of 2020. Vidrio Andino’s float glass plant located in the last quarteroutskirts of 2015. Bogota, Colombia, had been one of our main suppliers of raw glass. We believe this transaction will solidify our vertical integration strategy by acquiring an interest in the first stage of our production chain, while securing ample glass supply for our expected production needs.

The investment for this project wasjoint venture agreement includes plans to build a new plant in Galapa, Colombia that will be located approximately $45 million for20 miles from our primary manufacturing facility, in which we will also have a 25.8% interest. The new plant will be funded with proceeds from the equipment and facilities, and was financed primarily with a credit facility with an export credit guaranteeoriginal cash contribution made by the German Federal Government.Company, operating cashflows from the Bogota plant, debt incurred at the joint venture level that will not consolidate into the Company and an additional contribution by us of approximately $12.5 million to be paid between 2020 and 2021 if needed (based on debt availability).

 

We expectAdditionally, the Company carried out enhancements at its glass and aluminum facilities to increase production capacity and automate operations. The Company anticipates that current installedthese high return investments will speed up production processes in response to strong customer demand, especially for aluminum products. The Company expects to improve efficiency in its glass production by automating certain processes to increase capacity, will be enoughwhile reducing material waste and overall lead times. In its aluminum operations, the Company intends to service our backlogbenefit from a 25% increase in capacity and expected salesfavorable operating leverage with the addition of an aluminum furnace and a new extrusion line, along with working capital improvements through the year 2018. Capital expendituresautomation of warehousing systems. The Company completed this aluminum capacity expansion in the near future aremiddle of July of 2019 and implemented its automation initiatives by the start of 2020, with the funding being executed since the end of 2018 and expected to be limitedcompleted by the first quarter of 2020. The Company expects to maintaining installed capacity.

continue funding these capital investments mainly with cash on hand.

Results of Operations (Amounts in thousands)

 

  For the Years ended 
  December 31, 
  2016  2015(1) 
       
Net operating revenue $305,016  $242,239 
Cost of sales  192,369   151,381 
Gross Profit  112,647   90,858 
Operating expenses  64,799   51,267 
Operating income  47,848   39,591 
Change in fair value of warrant liability  776   (24,901)
Change in fair value of earnout share liability  4,674   (10,858)
Non-operating income, net  4,155   5,054 
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)  (1,387)  10,059 
Interest expense  (16,814)  (9,274)
Income tax provision  (16,072)  (20,691)
Net income (loss) $23,180  $(11,020)

(1) Prior-period financial information has been retroactively adjusted for the acquisitions transaction between entities under common control. See Notes 1 and 3 of our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

  Years ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Operating Revenues $430,912  $370,984 
Cost of sales  295,103   250,767 
Gross profit  135,809   120,217 
Operating expenses  (76,994)  (73,022)
Operating income  58,815   47,195 
Non-operating income  1,565   2,915 
Foreign currency transactions losses  (973)  (14,461)
Equity method income  596   - 
Interest Expense and deferred cost of financing  (22,806)  (21,187)
Income tax provision  (12,928)  (5,976)
Net income  24,269   8,486 
Loss attributable to non-controlling interest  266   545 
Income attributable to parent $24,535  $9,031 

 

Comparison of years ended December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015

Revenue2018

 

Our operating revenue increased $59.9 million, or 16.2%, from $242.2$371.0 million in 2015the year ended December 31, 2018 to $305.0$430.9 million in 2016, or 26%.the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was mostly driven by a successful executing of our strategy to continue increasing our participation infurther penetrate the U.S. market, as well as by constructionwhich continues to be key. While we continue to have a strong position in the South Florida region, we are continuously diversifying into other regions.

Sales in the United States market increased $71.5 million, or 24.1%, from $296.5 million in in the year ended December 31, 2018, to $368.1 million in in the year ended December 31, 2019. A portion of the Company’s sales growth in the otherAmerican market have been driven by our Elite and Prestige lines aimed towards residential markets, in which we participate.did not actively participate prior to 2017. U.S. Sales contributed 85% and 80% of our consolidated sales during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in U.S revenues is aligned with our strategy to penetrate new geographical and end markets.

 

The increase is partially due to high quality, reliability, and competitive prices which allowed us to further penetrate our existing markets and sell a larger volume of Company products. Sales in the U.S.Colombian market amounted to $190.0 million, an increase of $44.8decreased $10.1 million, or 31% over 2015. The increase is also partially due16.2%, from $62.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2018, to a successful penetration of different markets within$52.3 million in the country, especially the north east, goingyear ended December 31, 2019 resulting from a more Florida based business into a more diversified effort. Sales toslow construction market and sales comprised mainly of smaller projects with only few medium-to-large projects being executed.

Cost of sales increased $44.3 million, or 17.7%, from $250.8 million in the US markets include, in average, more sophisticated products than the other markets in which the Company participates which also makes them higher priced products. Inyear ended December 31, 2016, the Company acquired ESW LLC, and as a result, sales2018, to the U.S. market$295.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 are $3.42019. As a result, gross profit increased $15.6 million, higher than the amount previously reported, as prior period financial information has been retroactively adjusted for the acquisition transaction between entities under common control. This acquisition had an impact of $4.9or 13.0%, from $120.2 million on U.S. sales duringin the year ended December 31, 2016.

Sales in Colombia, priced in Colombian pesos, increased by $17.52018, to $135.8 million or approximately 22%, however, in terms of local currency represented a 35% increase, offset by unfavorable exchange rates. Sales in Panama increased by $2.1 million, or 28.9%, and sales to other territories decreased by $1.6 million, which represents a 16% decrease, mainly related to a larger focus into the U.S market.

Cost of sales and gross profit margins

Cost of sales increased $41.0 million or 27% from $151.4 million duringfor the year ended December 31, 2015 to $192.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, relatively proportional with growth in the Company’s operating revenue. Sales2019 while gross profit margins, calculated by dividing the gross profit by operating revenue decreased slightlyrevenues, compressed from 37.5%32.4% to 36.9%31.5% between the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015, respectively. While the cost of raw material as a percentage of revenues decreased slightly, the improvement in raw material efficiency was offset by a $5.6 million increase in labor cost related to the hiring of new employees to be trained into the new lines and for the Low Emissivity glass plant and a $4.0 million increase in depreciation charged to the cost of goods sold2019 as a result of the Company’s recent capital expenditures further discussed above in the capital resources sectionan unfavorable mix of this discussion.

Operating Expenses

sales and higher than expected installation and labor costs , partially offset by diluting our fixed costs over higher sales.

Operating expenses increased 26%, or $13.5 million, from the year ended December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016. Selling expense increased $4.6$4.0 million, or 17%5.4%, from $27.6 million in 2015 to $32.3 million in 2016. The principal factors of this increase was an increase of $3.6 million in shipping expense associated with incremental business in more distant markets within the United States that require more land transportation to reach its final destination. Additionally, personnel expense increased $0.6 million or 11%. The Company’s provision for bad debt and write off increased $3.2 million, from $1.5 million to $4.7 million.

General and Administrative expenses increased $5.7 million, or 26%, from $22.2 million to $27.9 million between the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016.Main increase was associated with increases in personnel expense, which increased $1.9 million, an increase of $0.8 million in professional fees associated with business, accounting and legal and consulting. Additionally, the Company incurred in $1.4 million higher expenses associated with bank charges, fees and an increase in a Colombian tax on financial transactions associated with the refinance of a significant portion of the Company’s debt in January of 2016.

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability

We had a non-cash, non-operating gain of $0.8 related to the change in fair value of warrant liability during the year before its expiration on December 20, 2016. The Company had a loss of $24.9$73.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 from the change in fair value of the warrant liability. The change in fair value of the warrants is associated2018 to external market factors such as the market price of our shares and the volatility index of comparable companies. There are no income tax effects of this warrant liability due to our Company being registered in the Cayman Islands. Management does not consider the effects of the change in the fair value of the warrants to be indicative of our ongoing operating performance and does not expect any such charges going forward as the totality of its warrants have either being exchanged, exercised, or expired by their own terms on December 20, 2016.

Change in Fair Value of Earnout share liability

We had a non-cash, non-operating gain of $4.7 million related to the change in fair value of the earnout liability during the year before the extinguishment of the liability on December 20, 2016.Through November 30, 2016, the Company had achieved an EBITDA substantially higher than the required EBITDA to release the shares. As a result, the Company instructed the Escrow Agent to release the remaining 1,500,000 ordinary shares of the Company held in escrow to Energy Holding Corp., the former stockholder of Tecnoglass, in accordance with the terms of the Escrow Agreement governing the EBITDA shares. The release of the shares under the Escrow Agreement prior to December 31, 2016 resulted in the reclassification of the earnout share liability to equity, once adjusted to fair value at the date of the release. In conjunction with the release of the shares, the Escrow Agreement has been terminated.The Company had a loss of $10.9$77.0 million in the year ended December 31, 20152019, improving as a percentage of sales from the change19.7% to 17.9%. The improvement as a percentage of sales represents a gain in fair value of earnout share liability. The fair value of the earnout shares changes in response to market factorsoperating leverage over our fixed administrative cost structure over some variable components such as the market price of our sharessales commissions and the volatility index of comparable companies and the Company’s forecasted EBITDA. There are no income tax effects of this earnout liability dueshipping cost, which we actively seek to our Company being registered in the Cayman Islands. Management does not consider the effects of the change in the fair value of the earnout shares to be indicative of our ongoing operating performance.make more efficient.

 

Interest Expense

Between the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, interest expense increased by $7.5$1.6 million, or approximately 81%7.6%, from $9.3 million to $16.8 million as our debt increased from $139.1 million as of December 31, 2015 to $199.6 million in December 31, 2016 mainly as a result of our growth capital expenditure initiatives geared toward increasing our installed capacity.

Non-Operating Income and Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses

Non-operating income decreased $0.9 million, from $5.1$21.2 million in the year ended December 31, 20152018 to $4.2$22.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily as2019 commensurate with a result7.2% increase in our total debt, from $242.3 million at the end of a decrease2018 to $259.8 million at the end of 2019.

Non-operating income decreased $1.4 million, or 46.3%, from $2.9 million in interest income on receivable, as well as recoveries of scrap. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018 to $1.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2019. Non-operating income is primarily comprised of interests on receivables and short-term investments, rent income and recoveries on scrap materials.

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded a foreign currency transaction loss of $1.4$1.0 million compared with a gain of $10.1and $14.5 million, during the year ended December 31, 2015,respectively, related to the Company’s Colombian subsidiaries ES and TG, which have the Colombian Peso as functional currency yet have importantbut a substantial portion of their monetary assets and liabilities denominated in US Dollar denominated transactions.Dollars. Foreign currency transaction gainslosses during the year ended December 31, 2015 are2018 were associated with foreign currency transactions asa net US Dollar liability position of the Colombian peso devaluated 32%subsidiaries, which coupled with a 9% devaluation of the Colombian Peso during the year, ended December 2015 but remained relatively stableup signifying a higher amount of liabilities in Pesos when compared against the US Dollar. Conversely, despite significant volatility in the U.S. Dollar to Colombian Peso exchange rate during 2019, the Colombian peso only depreciated less than 1% from the beginning to the end of the year.

Income tax expense increased $7.0 million, or 116.3%, from $6.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2016.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense decreased $4.62018 to $12.9 million from $20.7 million in 2015 to $16.1 million in 2016. This was primarily the result of lower taxable income in the Colombian subsidiaries which generate all of the Company’s income tax expense until the acquisition of ESW LLC in December, 2016. The reduction of taxable income in the Colombian subsidiaries is strongly related to the reduction of non-operating gains during fiscal year 2016. The Company’s effective tax rate of 261% for the year ended December 31, 2015 differs widely from the statutory rate2019, mostly as a result of 39% becausea 157.2% increase of income before tax as a result of the non-taxable non-operating losses dueforegoing, and a decrease of effective income tax rate from 41.3% in 2018 to changes34.8% in 2019. The decrease in statutory tax rate is related to the fair value of warrant liability and earnout shares.2018 Colombian tax reform, which lowered the corporate statutory income tax rate from 37% in 2018 to 34% in 2019.

Cash flow fromFlow From Operations, Investing and Financing Activities

 

During the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015, $3.12018, $26.7 million and $2.5$5.0 million weregenerated and used in and provided by operating activities, respectively. The principalWhile the use of cash was an increase in trade accounts receivable which amounted to $26.0 million and $29.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, as a direct result of the company´s ongoing growth and an industry related longer cash cycle. The aforementioned factor influencing the cash flow uses as it relates to the Company’s account receivables are associated to more sophisticated, long-lead projectsoperating activities in which the Company is currently bidding. These projects typically have a longer cash cycle as distributors also have to collect from end-users, and for that, certain performance conditions must always be met. Secondly, the Company´s strategy continues to be to further penetrate additional, more distant markets within the United States, which also may contribute to longer collection cycles. Albeit these factors, the Company does not foresee a deterioration in its ability to collect from its direct or indirect clients (as evidenced by its relatively stable days sales outstanding relation without accounting for foreign currency translation). During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a write off for $3.2 million of unbilled receivables as a onetime adjustment to a large project in which the Company has participated as well as $1.3 million write off of ESW LLC’s receivables prior to the acquisition by the Company, as well as $0.2 million of other provisions. The Company continues to focus on ways to improve collection times with some of its most representative clients.

Trade accounts payable during the year ended December 31, 2016 generated $1.6 million compared with $15.4 million generated during 2015 as the Company’s sought lean manufacturing initiatives to optimize inventory purchases and operate with lower levels. As a comparison, one of our main uses of cash in 20152018 was related to the purchase of inventories which amountedworking capital required to $29.2 million assupport the Company built up raw materials taking advantage of opportunistic buys, and commensurate with expected future18% sales at the time. In contrast, for 2016 we had a use of $4.3 million despite the robust growth during the year.

Customer advances on uncompleted contracts, mainly comprised of ES long term projects, resultedyear, effective inventory management and other working capital initiatives led to the positive cashflow, despite also growing sales by 16.2% year over year in a use of $6.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with $6.3 million provided the previous year as numerous projects reached stages closer to completion in which the advances applied.

Taxes payable used $2.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $14.1 million generated during the year ended December 31, 2015. This is the result of the Colombian subsidiaries, which required a use of cash as the income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $12.2 million higher than for the year ended December 31, 2014.2019.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, procurement of inventories was the largest source of operating cashflow, generating $8.4 million, in contrast with a use of $28.1 million in 2018. Tight inventory management and streamlining processes have allowed the Company to decrease inventory levels, despite increasing sales, thus speeding up inventory turnovers. Another significant source of cash within operating activities was taxes payable, as a result of the Company more than doubling its income before tax between 2018 and 2019.

The largest use of cash in operating activities during 2019, was trade accounts receivable, which used $19.6 million, in comparison with $23.7 million during the prior year which was associated to revenue growth in both years. Despite the increase in trade accounts receivable and use of cash, the Company’s days sales outstanding remain relatively stable between 2018 and 2019. It is expected that given the industry related longer cash cycle, during periods of accelerated growth, accounts receivable may remain a significant use of operating cashflow but partially offset by the further penetration into the residential market which carries a lower sales cycle.

We used $59.2 million and $18.7 million in investing activities increased to $24.7 million compared with $9.4 million during 2015 primarily asthe years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The main use of cash in investing activities was a $8.0 million increase inpayment for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment paid for25.8% equity interest in Vidrio Andino, a joint-venture with cash, while total acquisitions of property, and equipment, including property acquired through debt and capital lease decreased $37.7 million when comparing the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2016, and in addition to the cashSaint-Gobain described above under Capital Resources. Additionally, capital expenditures, of $22.9including assets acquired with credit or debt (which are not reflected in cash flows from investing activities) amounted to $26.2 million and $13.6 million during the period,2019 and 2018, respectively.

The main source of cash during 2019 was financing activities, which generated $47.3 million. In March 2019, the Company made capital expendituresclosed an underwritten follow-on public offering of 5,551,423 ordinary shares, including the underwriters’ over-allotment option, for $19.6net proceeds of $36.5 million. Additionally, the Company generated proceeds of debt for $45.5 million, that were financed with bank loans and capital leases. The decrease in capital expenditures ismostly related to the completion of the company´s growth phasea $30 million five year term facility, proceeds which were mostly used to get its installed capacity to a more appropriate level to address future growth.

Cash provided by financing activities increased from $9.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 to $31.5 million the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to increases in proceeds from debt. As can be seen in the statement of cash flows,repay then existing short-term debt the Company has used the proceeds of the debt increasehad accumulated to repay short term obligations while preparing to close on the issuance of a long term note further described in the liquidity section above, as well as support its rapid expansion and the related capital expenditures andfund working capital needs.required to support nine quarters with consecutive quarter-over-quarter sales growth., Net of repayments we generated $16.0 million from debt while continuing the decrease of its leverage metrics given the Company´s continued growth and profitability.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2016.

Contractual Obligations

Future contractual obligations represent an impact to future cash flows as shown in the table for the period ended December 31, 2016:

  Payments Due by Period (In thousands) 
Contractual Obligations TOTAL  Less than 1 year  1-3 years  3-5 years  More than 5 years 
Long Term Debt Obligations $175,901  $2,651  $4,615  $4,657  $163,978 
Capital Lease Obligations  

23,696

   -   -   -   

23,696

 
Interest Obligations  68,373   15,101   29,999   14,897   8,376 
Total $267,970  $17,752  $34,614  $19,554  $196,050 

Future interest obligations are estimated assuming constant reference rates for obligations with variable interest rates. The average interest rate is approximately 8.6% per annum for long term debt obligations respectively, and varies up or down in accordance with money market rates in Colombia. On January 23, 2017, the Company successfully issued a U.S. dollar denominated, $210 million offering of 5-year senior unsecured notes at a coupon rate of 8.2% in the international debt capital markets under Rule 144A of the Securities Act to qualified institutional investors. The Company will use approximately $179 million of the proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness and as a result will achieve a lower cost of debt and strengthen its capital structure given the non-amortizing structure of the new bond. The Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 reflects the effect of this refinance of the Company’s current portion of long term debt and other current borrowings into long term debt based on the Company’s intent as of that date. The Company’s capital lease obligations amounting to $23,696 was prepaid in 2017 with proceeds from the 5 year senior note.2019.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires that management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and other related amounts during the periods covered by the financial statements. Management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the future resolution of the uncertainties increases, these judgments become more subjective and complex. We have identified the following accounting policies as the most important to the portrayalpresentation and disclosure of our current financial condition and results of operations.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Our principal sources of revenue are derived from product sales, and supply and installation contracts. We identified one single performance obligation for both forms of manufactured glasssales. Revenue is recognized when control is transferred to our customers. For product sales, the performance obligations are satisfied at a point in time and aluminum products. Delivery to the customercontrol is deemed to have occurredbe transferred upon delivery. For supply and installation contracts, the performance obligations are satisfied over time and control is deemed to be transferred when the titlecontract is passed to the customer. Generally, the title passes to the customer upon shipment, but could occur when the customer receives the product based on the terms of the agreement with the customer. The selling prices of all goods that the Company sells are fixed, and agreed to with the customer, prior to shipment. Selling prices are generally based on established list prices.

The Company recognizes revenue for standard form sales. Standard form sales are customer sales comprising low value installations that are of short duration. A standard form agreement is executed between the Company and its customer. Services are performedaccepted by the Company during the installation process. The price quote is determined by the Company, based on the requested installation, and approved by the customer before the Company proceeds with the installation. The customer’s credit worthiness and payment capacity is evaluated before the Company will proceed with the initial order process.

our customers. Revenues from fixed pricesupply and installation contracts which represent approximately 16.0% and 21.6% of the Company’s sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are recognized using the percentage-of-completioncost-to-cost method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to total estimated costs for each contract. These contracts typically have a duration ranging between one and three years. Revenues recognized in advance of amounts billable pursuantContract modifications routinely occur to contracts terms are recorded as unbilled receivables on uncompleted contracts based on work performed and costs to date. Unbilled receivables on uncompleted contracts are billable upon various events, including the attainment of performance milestones, delivery and installation of product, or completion of the contract. Revisions to cost estimates as contracts progress have the effect of increasing or decreasing expected profits each period. Changes in contract estimates occuraccount for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope,specifications or requirements. In most cases, contract modifications are for goods or services that are not distinct and, therefore, are accounted for as part of the existing contract. Transaction price estimates include additional consideration for submitted contract modifications or claims when the Company believes it has an enforceable right to the modification or claim, the amount can be reliably estimated revenue and cost estimates. Changeits realization is reasonably assured. Amounts representing modifications accounted for as part of the existing contract are included in contract estimates have not hadthe transaction price and recognized as an adjustment to sales on a material effect on our financial statements.cumulative catch-up basis.

 

Related party transactions

 

The Company has related party transactions such as sales, purchases, leases, guarantees, and other payments.payments done during the ordinary course of business and at arm´s length. We perform a related party analysis to identify transactions to disclose quarterly. Dependingbe disclosed on thea quarterly basis, and depending on those transactions, we aggregate some related partythe information by type. When necessary we also discloseparty so the name of a related party, if doing so is required to understand the relationship.

Estimation of Fair Value of warrant liability

The best evidence of fair value is current prices in an active market for similar financial instruments. We determine the fair value of warrant liability byrelationship with the Company using the Binomial Lattice pricing model. This model is dependent upon several variables such as the instrument’s expected term, expected strike price, expected risk-free interest rate over the expected instrument term, the expected dividend yield rate over the expected instrument term and the expected volatility of the Company’s stock price over the expected term. The expected term represents the period of time that the instruments granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected strike price is based upon a weighted average probability analysis of the strike price changes expected during the term as a result of the down round protection. The risk-free rates are based on U.S. Treasury securities with similar maturities as the expected terms of the options at the date of valuation. Expected dividend yield is based on historical trends. The Company measures volatility using a blended weighted average of the volatility rates for a number of similar publicly-traded companies. The inputs to the model were stock price, dividend yield, risk-free rate, expected term and volatility.

In general, the inputs used are unobservable; therefore unless indicated otherwise, warrant liability is classified as level 3 under guidance for fair value measurements hierarchy.

Given the fact that the totality of our warrants has been either exchanged, exercised or expired by their own terms on December 20th, 2016, we do not expect to have to account for the fair value of these instruments going forward.

Estimation of Fair Value of Earnout share liability

The best evidence of fair value is current prices in an active market for similar financial instruments. We determine the fair value of earnout share liability by the Company using Monte Carlo simulation, which models future EBITDA and stock prices during the earn-out period using the Geometric Brownian Motion. This model is dependent upon several variables such as the instrument’s expected term, expected risk-free interest rate over the expected instrument term, the equity volatility of the Company’s stock price over the expected term, the asset volatility, and the Company’s forecasted EBITDA. The expected term represents the period of time that the instruments granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rates are based on U.S. Treasury securities with similar maturities as the expected terms of the options at the date of valuation. The Company measures volatility using a blended weighted average of the volatility rates for a number of similar publicly-traded companies. The inputs to the model were stock price, risk-free rate, expected term and volatility.

In general, the inputs used are unobservable; therefore unless indicated otherwise, earnout share liability is classified as level 3 under guidance for fair value measurements hierarchy.

Given the fact that the 1,500,000 remaining earnout shares were awarded as a result of the Company meeting the required EBITDA target for 2016, we do not expect to have to account for the fair value of these instruments going forward.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We conduct interest rate swap (IRS) transaction with key non-related financial entities to reduce the effect of interest rate fluctuations as economic hedges against interest rate risk. We have designated these derivatives at fair value and the accounting for changes is recorded in the statement of operations. The inputs used are similar to the prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets directly or indirectly through market corroboration; therefore unless indicated otherwise, derivatives are classified as level 2 under guidance for fair value measurements hierarchy.properly understood.

 

Foreign currency transactions

 

The functional currency of most of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries and branches is the applicable local currency. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, while revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earningsincome within stockholders’shareholders’ equity. The Company also recognizes gains and losses associated with transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies within non-operating income in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The average exchange rate for the Colombian peso, the functional currency of the Company’s main subsidiaries, was 3,050.98 pesos per USD $1 and 2,743.39 pesos per USD $1 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The spot exchange rate for the Colombian peso, as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, was 3,000.71 pesos per USD $1 and 3,149.39 pesos per USD $1, respectively.operations.

41

Income taxes

 

The Company is subject to income taxes in some jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required inwhen determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income taxes represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. For each tax jurisdiction in which the Company operates, deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset and are presented as a single noncurrent amount within the consolidated balance sheets.

There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the period in which such determination is made.

The Company recognizes the financial statement effects of uncertain income tax positions when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. The Company accrues for other tax contingencies when it is probable that a liability to a taxing authority has been incurred and the amount of the contingency can be reasonably estimated. Interest accrued related to unrecognized tax and income tax related penalties are included in the provision for income taxes. The uncertain income taxes positions are recorded in “Taxes payable” in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Business combinations

 

We allocate the total purchase price of the acquired tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the business combination date, with the excess purchase price recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation process required us to use significant estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the business combination date. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from management of the acquired company, in part based on valuation models that incorporate projections of expected future cash flows and operating plans and are inherently uncertain. Valuations are performed by management or third party valuation specialists under management’s supervision. In determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, as appropriate, we may use one of the following recognized valuation methods: the income approach (including the cost saving method and the discounted cash flows from relief from royalty), the market approach and/or the replacement cost approach.

 

Examples of significant estimates used to value certain intangible assets acquired include but are not limited to:

 

sales volume, pricing and future cash flows of the business overall

future expected cash flows from customer relationships, and other identifiable intangible assets, including future price levels, rates of increase in revenue and appropriate attrition rate
  
the acquired company’s brand and competitive position, royalty rate, as well as assumptions about the period of time the acquired brand will continue to benefit to the combined company’s product portfolio
  
cost of capital, risk-adjusted discount rates and income tax rates

However, different assumptions regarding projected performance and other factors associated with the acquired assets may affect the amount recorded under each type of assets and liabilities, mainly between property, plant and equipment, intangibles assets, goodwill and deferred income tax liabilities and subsequent assessment could result in future impairment charges. The purchase price allocation process also entails us to refine these estimates over a measurement period not to exceed one year to reflect new information obtained surrounding facts and circumstances existing at acquisition date.

 

Acquisitions of entities under common control are recorded retroactively starting from the first date of common control. Instead of using fair value, the Company consolidates the financial statements of the entity acquired using the existing carrying values.

 

Dividend payments

We accounthave accounted for dividends declared as a liability under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, since our shareholders hashave had the option to elect cash or stock. When the dividend ishas been declared, we record the transaction as a reduction to retained earnings and an increase to dividends payable. We then reclassify stock dividends from dividends payable to additional paid-in capital when the shareholder electelects a stock dividend instead of cash. The dividend payable is not subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date since the dividend is a fixed monetary amount known at inception and thus no change in fair value adjustment is necessary.

Long Lived Assets

The Company periodically reviews the carrying values of its long lived assets when events or changes in circumstances would indicate that it is more likely than not that their carrying values may exceed their realizable values, and record impairment charges when considered necessary.

When circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred, the Company tests such assets for recoverability by comparing the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of such assets and their eventual disposition to their carrying amounts. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss, measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value, is recognized. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.

Goodwill

We review goodwill for impairment each year on December 31st or more frequently when events or significant changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Under ASC 350-20-35-4 through 35-8A, the goodwill impairment test requires a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit is greater than zero and its fair value exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. The Company has only one reporting unit and as such the impairment analysis was done by comparing the Company’s market capitalization with its book value of equity. As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s market capitalization substantially exceeded its book value of equity and as such no impairment of goodwill was indicated. See Note 11- Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional information.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

Not Applicable.applicable.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

This information appears following Item 15Our consolidated financial statements, together with the report of our independent registered public accounting firm, appear commencing on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is includedare incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures.

 

None.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We performed an evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of Tecnoglass, Inc.´s design and operating effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that due to the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below, our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, were not effective as of December 31, 2016. Notwithstanding2019, in order to provide reasonable assurance that the material weaknessinformation disclosed in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 described below, we believereports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in all material respects in accordance with generally accepted accounting principlestime periods specified in the United States of America for each of the periods presented herein.SEC’s rules and forms and to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Our management, including the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria set forth in the “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)”.

 

Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that due to the material weakness described below, our internal control over financial reporting aswas effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of December 31, 2016, was not effective.

A “material weakness” is a deficiency or combinationfinancial reporting and the preparation of deficiencies,financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. PwC Contadores y Auditores Ltda. has independently assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting such that thereand its report is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company´s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We have identified, as of December 31, 2016, the following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting:

Entity-Level Controls - The Company has not completed the process of establishing the proper design of the Entity Level Controls which support the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting, therefore, certain deficiencies in these controls may not provide reasonable assurance that the control environment for risk and fraud management is effective.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.included below.

 

Remediation of Material WeaknessesWeakness regarding the Financial Closing and Reporting Process and the Information Technology General Controls (ITGC´s) identified for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015our internal control over financial reporting (ICFR)

 

As stated in our annual report on Form 10K, for the fiscalperiod ended December 31, 2018, management identified a deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting due to fact that the Company did not design and maintain effective controls over the completeness, accuracy, existence, valuation and presentation of the balances of the income tax related accounts. Specifically, the Company’s monitoring and control activities related to i) the unrealized foreign exchange amount, ii) the use of the applicable tax rates and iii) the application of the revenue recognition methodology for tax purposes in the United States were not effective. Notwithstanding of this material weakness, adjustments to the deferred income taxes and income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2015, management identified some material weaknesses regarding the Financial Closing and Reporting Process and the Information Technology General Controls (ITGC´s).

2018, were immaterial.

During 2016,2019, the Company strengthened the existing internal controls related to estimating and accounting for deferred income taxes and determining the effective tax rate; furthermore, the Company also implemented specific review procedures designed to enhance our income tax monitoring control, concluding the required controls and performed additional procedures in order to determine the effectivenessdeficiency as remediated as of the design and operation of such controls.December 31, 2019. The Company’s remediation actions included:

 

Financial ClosingImplemented a review checklist to ensure accuracy and Reporting Process: Implemented controlscompleteness regarding our taxing and enhanced procedures regarding warrant liabilities and earnout shares liabilitiesaccounting reconciliation. The temporary differences have been appropriately included in order to account for changes in fair value accurately and properly at each reporting period until exercised or expired. Regarding the basis for calculating diluted earnings per share, we took into account the effect of dilutive earnout shares. Established common practices and procedures to record and present our shipping and handling costs in selling expenses. Established procedures for netting deferred taxes according to GAAP requirements. Implemented controls over the identification, accounting treatment, classification and nature of non-routine, unusual transactions, inclusive of significant related party transactions. Designed accounting policies, implemented quarterly and annual financial reporting timelines and constituted a Disclosure Committee where relevant matters regarding financial reporting are discussed and disclosures completeness and appropriateness is assessed.calculations.
  
Information Technology General Controls:AnalyzedSegregated the information systems accesses and roles and identified Segregation of Duties conflicts. Implemented softwares for users and roles management and tracking and documenting Information Systems versioning. Constituted the IT Committee that ensures the adequatedeferred tax calculations analysis and mitigation of inherent Segregation of Duties conflicts and ensures an adequate risk and impact analysis for the approval of changes to the company’s Information Systems. Controls to ensure appropriate software implementation were designed and implemented.

Management’s Actions to Remediate the Entity Level Controls Material Weakness

Management took the following steps to remediate this material weakness:

Designed and communicated our Code of Conduct for our employees and suppliers.review processes.
  
Implemented the reporting channel (i.e. Web Case Management and Hotline)Review Controls were implemented with NAVEX Global.high level of accuracy for detecting taxation errors.
  
The Ethics and Compliance and Financial Planning and Analysis divisions were created.
 
ImplementedCreated controls and updated procedures related to preventthe effective tax rate reconciliations and deter Money Laundering practices.
Enhanceddeferred tax calculations in order to have traceable and expanded our USGAAP training program for our finance and accounting personnel considering relevant topics according the company´s transactions.
Assessed the Conflict of Interests of our employees.

Assessed the illegal acts, fraud and corruption risks and designed our anti-fraud and corruption policy. Related controls will be implemented and monitored during 2017.

Prepared the budget for the year 2017 which will be approved by the Board of Directors during the first quarter of 2017.

Developed the internal audit plan for strengthening our independent oversight of internal controls over financial reporting, enhancing our Entity Level Controls.reliable information.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for recent acquisitions

As stated in Item 1 - “Our business”, during December, 2016, we acquired complete ownership of ESWindows LLC. For purposes of evaluating internal controls over financial reporting, we determined that the internal controls of the acquired company would be excluded from our internal control assessment as of December 31, 2016, due to the timing of the closing of this acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2016, ESWindows LLC contributed approximately 0.6% of total assets, and 1.7% of total revenues.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

As discussed in the sections “Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Managements Actions to Remediate Material Weaknesses”,section above, there were changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the year 2016.2019.

Item 9B.Other Information.

Item 9B.Other Information.

 

None.

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

 

Directors and Executive Officers

 

Our current directors and executive officers are as follows:

 

Name Age Position
José M. Daes 5660 Chief Executive Officer and Director
Christian T. Daes 5256 Chief Operating Officer and Director
Santiago Giraldo 
Joaquin Fernandez5644 Chief Financial Officer
A. Lorne Weil 6674 Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Luis Fernando Castro Vergara 53 
Samuel R. Azout57Independent Director
Juan Carlos Vilariño54Independent Director
Martha (Stormy) L. Byorum 6271 Independent Director
Julio A. Torres 4953 Independent Director
Carlos Alfredo Cure Cure75Director

 

José M. Daes has served as our chief executive officer and a director since December 2013 and has been involved with TG and ES since its inception.2013. Mr. Daes has over 30 years’ experience starting and operating various businesses in Colombia and the U.S. Mr. Daes has served as chief executive officer of ESC.I. Energia Solar S.A. E.S. Windows (“ES”) since its inception in 1984, responsible for all aspects of ES’s operations. Mr. Daes also co-founded Tecnoglass S.A. (“TG”) in 1994. Mr. Daes began his career in textiles, importing textiles from Japan to Colombia and later owned and operated an upscale clothing store with multiple locations in Miami. Mr. Daes is the older brother of Christian T. Daes, our chief operating officer and a director.

 

We believe Mr. Daes is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his operational experience with ES and TG, our operating subsidiaries, and his knowledge of the industry within which they operate.

Christian T. Daes has served as our chief operating officer and a director since December 2013. Mr. Daes has served as the chief executive officer of TG since its inception in 1994, responsible for all aspects of TG’s operations. Mr. Daes’s philanthropic activities include founding the Tecnoglass-ES Windows Foundation, which promotes local development, health and social programs in Barranquilla, Colombia. Mr. Daes is the younger brother of José M. Daes, our chief executive officer and a director.

We believe Mr. Daes is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his operational experience with ES and TG and his knowledge of the industry within which they operate.

Christian T. DaesSantiago Giraldo has served as our deputy chief operatingfinancial officer from February 2016 until August 2017 and a director since December 2013 and has been involved with TG and ES since their inception. Mr. Daes has served as the chief executive officer of Tecnoglass since its inception in 1994, responsible for all aspects of Tecnoglass’ operations. Mr. Daes’ philanthropic activities include founding the Tecnoglass-ES Windows Foundation, which promotes local development, health and social programs in Barranquilla, Colombia. Mr. Daes is the younger brother of José M. Daes, our chief executive officer and director.

We believe Mr. Daes is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his operational experience with ES and TG and his knowledge of the industry within which they operate.

Joaquín F. Fernández has served as our chief financial officer since Decembersuch time. From February 2013 to February 2016, Mr. Giraldo was the Chief Financial Officer and Business Development and Strategy Head of Oleoducto Central S.A., the chief financial officer for TGowner and ES since 2007. He has also served as a director of ES since January 2002. Mr. Fernández oversees the gathering, reporting, presentation and interpretationoperator of the historical financial information for us and our subsidiaries, as well as implementationOcensa pipeline in Colombia (subsidiary of financial strategy for us.the Ecopetrol Group, the National Oil Company). From October 2009 to February 2013, Mr. Giraldo was Vice President of Oil & Gas Corporate Banking at Citibank. Prior to joining TG and ES,this, Mr. Fernández worked at fuel distribution, outsourcing, and public utility companies.Giraldo was with JPMorgan Chase where he most recently held the position of Vice President of Corporate Banking for diversified industries.

 

A. Lorne Weil has served as a member of our board of directors and non-executive chairman of the board since our inception. Mr. Weil serves as Executive Chairman of Inspired Entertainment, Inc., a position he has held since December 2016. Previously, Mr. Weil served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Inspired’s predecessor, Hydra Industries Acquisition Corp., from October 2014 to December 2016. Since September 2017, Mr. Weil has also served as Executive Chairman of Leisure Acquisition Corp., a blank check company seeking to consummate an initial business combination. He has also served as a principal of Hydra Management, an investment vehicle formed by Mr. Weil, since September 2014. Mr. Weil has also served as a director of Sportech Plc, one of the largest suppliers and operators of pools/tote (often also referred to as pari-mutuel) betting in the world, since October 2010. From October 1991 to November 2013, Mr. Weil served as chairman of the board of Scientific Games Corporation, a supplier of technology-based products, systems and services to gaming markets worldwide, and served as its chief executive officer from April 1992 until November 2013. Mr. Weil also served as president of Scientific Games from August 1997 to June 2005. From 1979 to November 1992, Mr. Weil was president of Lorne Weil, Inc., a firm providing strategic planning and corporate development services to high technology industries. Previously, Mr. Weil was vice president of corporate development at General Instrument Corporation, working with wagering and cable systems.

 

We believe Mr. Weil is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his extensive business experience in strategic planning and corporate development, his contacts he has fostered throughout his career, as well as his operational experience.

26

Samuel R. AzoutLuis Fernando Castro Vergarahas served on our board of directors since DecemberNovember 2018. Since 2017, Mr. Castro Vergara has been serving as a fund manager in the agroindustry sector and overseeing his investments in the construction, infrastructure and agroindustry sectors. Mr. Castro Vergara served as the Chief Executive Officer of Banco de Comercio Exterior de Colombia S.A., Colombia’s development bank, from 2013 to 2017. From 2007 to 2008 and 2012 to 2013, Mr. Castro Vergara was the General Manager of Agrodex International SAS, an import and marketing food company. From 2008 to 2012, he was the Regional Development Agency President of the Barranquilla Chamber of Commerce. Previously, he was General Manager of Provyser S.A., a commercialization and logistics services company in the food industry. He is on the board of TG since February 2009. Since March 2013, Mr. Azout has serveddirectors of Unimed Pharmaceuticals Limited, where he also serves as an investment manager for Abacus Real Estate. From January 2012 to March 2013, Mr. Azout served as the chief executive officermember of the National Agency for Overcoming Extreme PovertyAudit Committee, and of Colombian the Colombian companies Accenorte SAS and Devimed SAS. Mr. Castro Vergara received a B.S. from Fordham University, a B.S. from Columbia University and a M.B.A. from the Universidad de los Andes Bogota in Colombia, an organization formed by the government of Colombia to assist familiesColombia. He has complementary education in poverty. From September 2008 to January 2012, Mr. Azout was the senior presidential advisor for Social Prosperity, employed by the administration of the President of Colombia. Prior to this, Mr. Azout served as chief executive officer of Carulla Vivero S.A., the second largest retailer in Colombia, for 10 years, until he led its sale to Grupo Exito in 2006.economic development from Harvard University, strategy and leadership from Pennsylvania University and management from Northwestern University.

 

Juan Carlos Vilariño has served on our board of directors since December 2013, on the board of TG since November 1995 and on the board of ES since March 1997. Mr. Vilariño has worked as the general manager of various business highway concession consortiums in Colombia including the Malla Vial del Atlántico Highway Concession Consortium since 1993 and the Barranquilla-Ciénaga Highway Concession consortium since 1999. Mr. Vilariño began his career as the assistant vice president in the general consulting department of Finance Corporation of the North, S.A. We believe Mr. VilariñoCastro Vergara is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his contacts and business relationships in Colombia.and experienced as independent member on other boards.

 

Martha (Stormy) L. Byorum has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2011. Ms. Byorum is founder and chief executive officer of Cori Investment Advisors, LLC (Cori Capital), a financial services entity that was most recently (January 2005 through August 2013) a division of Stephens Inc., a private investment banking firm founded in 1933. Ms. Byorum was also an executive vice president of Stephens Inc. from January 2005 until August 2013. From March 2003 to December 2004, Ms. Byorum served as chief executive officer of Cori Investment Advisors, LLC, which was spun off from VB&P in 2003. Ms. Byorum co-founded VB&P in 1996 and served as a Partner until February 2003. Prior to co-founding VB&P in 1996, Ms. Byorum had a 24-year career at Citibank, where, among other things, she served as chief of staff and chief financial officer for Citibank’s Latin American Banking Group from 1986 to 1990, overseeing $15 billion of loans and coordinating activities in 22 countries. She was later appointed the head of Citibank’s U.S. Corporate Banking Business and a member of the bank’s Operating Committee and a Customer Group Executive with global responsibilities.

Ms. Byorum is a Life Trustee of Amherst College and a chairman of the finance committee of the board of directors of Northwest Natural Gas, a large distributor of natural gas services in the Pacific Northwest.

She also serves on the board of directors of JELD-WEN Holding, Inc., a vertically integrated global manufacturer and distributor of windows and doors, and Opes Acquisition Corp., a blank check company seeking to consummate an initial business combination.

We believe Ms. Byorum is well-qualified to serve as a member of the board of directors due to her operational experience with Cori Capital Advisors, VB&P and Citibank and her financial background, which includes having served on the audit committees of four publicly-traded companies.

Julio A. Torres has served on our board of directors since October 2011. He previously served as our co-chief executive officer from October 2011 through January 2013. Since March 2008,2013, Mr. Torres has served as the managing partner at Multiple Equilibria Capital, a financial advisory firm. From August 2015 to March 2018, Mr. Torres served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of Andina Acquisition Corp. II, a blank check company that consummated an initial business combination with Lazy Days’ R.V. Center, Inc. From March 2008 to February 2013, Mr. Torres served as managing director of Nexus Capital Partners, a private equity firm. From April 2006 to February 2008, Mr. Torres served with the Colombian Ministry of Finance acting as director general director of public credit and the treasury. From June 2002 to April 2006, Mr. Torres served as managing director of Diligo Advisory Group, an investment banking firm. From September 1994 to June 2002, Mr. Torres served as vice president with JPMorgan Chase Bank.

We believe Mr. Torres is well-qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors due to his operational experience with Nexus Capital Partners, his work with the Colombian government and his extensive contacts he has fostered while working at Nexus Capital Partners, JPMorgan Chase Bank and in the Colombian government.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceCarlos Alfredo Cure Cure has served on our board of directors since September 2019. Mr. Cure Cure currently acts as external advisor to Grupo Olímpica, one of the largest multi-industry conglomerates in Colombia, and is the former president of the Board of Directors of Ecopetrol S.A. (NYSE: EC), the leading oil & gas company in Colombia. From 2011 to 2013, Mr. Cure Cure served as the Colombian Ambassador to Venezuela. Earlier in his career, Mr. Cure Cure was the Financial Manager of Cementos del Caribe, General Manager of Cementos Toluviejo, General Manager of Astilleros Unión Industrial, and Sociedad Portuaria de Barranquilla. Mr. Cure Cure has served as a board member of Avianca (NYSE: AVH) and Isagen, and is the former President of Bavaria S.A. (AB Inbev, EBR: ABI). Mr. Cure Cure earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent ofWe believe Mr. Cure Cure is well-qualified to serve as a registered classmember of our equity securitiesboard of directors due to file reportshis leadership experience in other boards, contacts and business relationships in Colombia.

Code of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and ten percent shareholders are required by regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on a review of such reports received by us and written representations from certain reporting persons that no Form 5s were required for those persons, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, all reports required to be filed by our officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities were filed on a timely basis.Conduct

 

Code of Ethics

In March 2012,October 2017, we adopted aan updated code of ethicsconduct that applies to all of our executive officers, directors and employees. The code of ethicsconduct codifies the business and ethical principles that govern all aspects of our business. We will provide, without charge, upon request, copies of our code of ethics.conduct. Requests for copies of our code of ethicsconduct should be sent in writing to Tecnoglass Inc., Avenida Circunvalar a 100 mts de la Via 40, Barrio Las Flores, Barranquilla, Colombia, Attn: Corporate Secretary. Readers can also obtain a copy of our code of conduct on our website athttp://investors.tecnoglass.com/corporate-governance.cfm.

Shareholder Nominations

 

27

Corporate GovernanceThere have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

 

Audit Committee and Financial Expert

 

We have a standing audit committee of the board of directors, which consists of Martha L. Byorum, Samuel R. AzoutLuis Fernando Castro and Julio Torres, with Martha L. Byorum serving as chairman. Each of the members of the audit committee is independent under the applicable NASDAQNasdaq listing standards.

 

The audit committee has a written charter, a copy of which was filed with our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 5, 2016. The purpose of the audit committee is to appoint, retain, set compensation of, and supervise our independent accountants, review the results and scope of the audit and other accounting related services and review our accounting practices and systems of internal accounting and disclosure controls. The audit committee’s duties, which are specified in the audit committee charter, include, but are not limited to:

reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor the annual audited financial statements, and recommending to the board whether the audited financial statements should be included in our Form 10-K;
discussing with management and the independent auditor significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of our financial statements;
discussing with management major risk assessment and risk management policies;
monitoring the independence of the independent auditor;
verifying the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit as required by law;
reviewing and approving all related-party transactions;
inquiring and discussing with management our compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor, including the fees and terms of the services to be performed;
appointing or replacing the independent auditor;
determining the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work; and
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or reports which raise material issues regarding its financial statements or accounting policies.

The audit committee has discussed with the independent auditors the mattersAs required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) auditing standard No. 16 - Communication with Audit Committees, including independent accountant’s independence.

Financial Experts on Audit Committee

TheNasdaq listing standards, the audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of “independentindependent directors” as defined for audit committee members under the NASDAQ listing standards and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, who are “financially literate,literate.as defined under NASDAQ’s listing standards. NASDAQ’sNasdaq listing standards define “financially literate” as being able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement, and statement of operationscash flows. In addition, the Company must certify to Nasdaq the committee has, and cash flow statement.will continue to have, at least one member who has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background that results in the individual’s financial sophistication. The board of directors has determined that Martha Byorum satisfies NASDAQ’sNasdaq’s definition of financial sophistication and also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Nominating Committee

We have a standing nominating committee, which consists of A. Lorne Weil, Martha L. Byorum, Samuel R. Azout and Juan Carlos Vilariño, with A. Lorne Weil serving as chairperson. Each member of the nominating committee is an “independent director” as defined under NASDAQ listing standards. Pursuant to its written charter, a copy of which was filed with our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 5, 2016, our nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on our board of directors.

Guidelines for Selecting Director Nominees

The nominating committee considers persons identified by its members, management, shareholders, investment bankers and others. Currently, the guidelines for selecting nominees, which are specified in the nominating committee charter, generally provide that persons to be nominated:

should have demonstrated notable or significant achievements in business, education or public service;

should possess the requisite intelligence, education and experience to make a significant contribution to the board of directors and bring a range of skills, diverse perspectives and backgrounds to its deliberations; and

should have the highest ethical standards, a strong sense of professionalism and intense dedication to serving the interests of the shareholders.

The nominating committee will consider a number of qualifications relating to management and leadership experience, background and integrity and professionalism in evaluating a person’s candidacy for membership on the board of directors. The nominating committee may require certain skills or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to meet specific board needs that arise from time to time and will also consider the overall experience and makeup of its members to obtain a broad and diverse mix of board members. The nominating committee does not distinguish among nominees recommended by shareholders and other persons.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the nominating committee.

Compensation Committee

We have a standing compensation committee consisting of Julio Torres, Samuel R. Azout and Juan Carlos Vilariño, with Julio Torres serving as chairperson. Pursuant to the compensation committee charter, a copy of which was filed with our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 5, 2016, the compensation committee oversees our compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including our executive, director and other incentive and equity-based compensation plans. The specific responsibilities of the compensation committee include making recommendations to the board regarding executive compensation of our executive officers and non-employee directors, administering our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan, and preparing and reviewing compensation-related disclosure, including a compensation discussion and analysis and compensation committee report (if required), for our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Cayman Islands law does not limit the extent to which a company’s memorandum and articles of association may provide for indemnification of officers and directors, except to the extent any such provision may be held by the Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against willful fraud, willful misconduct, civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our third amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provides for indemnification of our officers and directors to the maximum extent permitted by law, including for any liability incurred in their capacities as such, except through their own actual fraud or willful neglect or willful default.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers, and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

No invitation whether directly or indirectly may be made to the public in the Cayman Islands to subscribe for the notes unless the Issuer is listed on the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

 

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

OverviewOverview; Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Our policies with respect to the compensation of our executive officers are administered by our board in consultation with our compensation committee. Our compensation policies are intended to provide for compensation that that: 

is sufficient to attract and retain executives of outstanding ability and potential;
is tailored to attract, motivate and retain executives of outstanding ability and potential and to establish an appropriate relationship between executive compensation and the creation of shareholder value. To meet these goals, the unique characteristics and needs of our company;
considers individual value and contribution to our success;
is designed to motivate our executive officers to achieve our annual and long-term goals by rewarding performance based on the attainment of those goals;
is designed to appropriately take into account risk and reward in the context of our business environment;
reflects an appropriate relationship between executive compensation and the creation of shareholder value; and
is sensitive to market benchmarks.

The compensation committee is charged with recommending executive compensation packages to our board.board that meet these goals. In making decisions about executive compensation, the compensation committee relies on the experience of its members as well as subjective considerations of various factors, including individual and corporate performance, our strategic business goals, each executive’s position, experience, level of responsibility, and future potential, and compensation paid by companies of similar size in our industry. The compensation committee does not set specific targets or benchmarks for overall compensation or for allocations between different elements of compensation.

 

Prior to consummation of the Business Combination in December 2013, noneOur compensation committee is charged with performing an annual review of our executive officers’ cash compensation and equity holdings to determine whether they provide adequate incentives and motivation to executive officers or directors received compensation for services renderedand whether they adequately compensate the executive officers relative to comparable officers in other companies. As part of this review, management submits recommendations to the Company. No compensation committee.

We believe it is important when making compensation-related decisions to be informed as to current practices of similarly situated publicly held companies in our industry. Our compensation committee stays appraised of the cash and equity compensation practices of publicly held companies in the glass and aluminum industries through the review of such companies’ public reports and through other resources. The companies chosen for inclusion in any benchmarking group would have business characteristics comparable to our company, including revenues, financial growth metrics, stage of development, employee headcount and market capitalization. While benchmarking may not always be appropriate as a stand-alone tool for setting compensation due to the aspects of our business and objectives, we generally believe that gathering this information is an important part of our compensation-related decision-making process.

Base Salaries

Each of our named executive officers is employed on an at-will basis. We do not have employment agreements in place for our named executive officers. Base salaries for our executive officers are individually determined by our compensation committee each year to ensure that each executive’s base salary forms part of a compensation package which appropriately rewards the executive for the value he or feesshe brings to our company. Each executive’s base salary may be increased or decreased in the discretion of the compensation committee in accordance with our compensation philosophy.

Bonuses

In addition to their base salaries, our named executive officers are entitled to receive annual performance bonuses based on the company’s financial performance and achievement of certain targets throughout the year.

Other Compensation and Benefits

Named executive officers receive additional compensation in the form of vacation, medical, 401(k), and other benefits generally available to all of our employees. We do not provide any kind, including finders, consultingother perquisites or other similar fees, were paidpersonal benefits to any of our initial shareholders, including our officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, prior to, or for any services they rendered in order to effectuate, the consummation of the initial business combination.named executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table summarizes the total compensation for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 of each of our named executive officers.

 

Name and principal

position

 Year  Salary  Bonus  Total  Year  Salary  Bonus  Total 
Jose M. Daes (1)  2016  $720,000  $412,213  $1,132,213   2019  $1,200,000  $240,000  $1,440,000 
Chief Executive Officer  2015  $720,000  $132,000  $852,000   2018  $1,020,000  $102,000  $1,122,000 
Christian T. Daes (2)  2016  $720,000  $288,723  $1,008,723   2019  $1,200,000  $240,000  $1,440,000 
Chief Operating Officer  2015  $438,000  $-  $438,000   2018  $1,020,000  $102,000  $1,122,000 
Joaquin Fernández (3)  2016  $133,897  $-  $133,897 
Santiago Giraldo (3)  2019  $181,037  $55,000  $236,037 
Chief Financial Officer  2015  $142,200  $12,000  $154,200   2018  $183,971  $50,000  $233,971 

 

(1)Mr. Daes was appointed Chief Executive Officer in December 2013 in connection with the Business Combination. Mr. Daes also serves as Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of ES.
  
(2)Mr. Daes was appointed Chief Operating Officer in December 2013 in connection with the Business Combination. Mr. Daes also serves as Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of Tecnoglass.TG.
  
(3)Mr. FernándezGiraldo’s 2019 salary was appointed Chief Financial Officerpaid in December 2013 in connection the Business Combination.Colombian pesos. The $181,037 salary represents Mr. Fernández also serves as Chief Financial OfficerGiraldo’s receipt of TG and ES.an aggregate of $594 million pesos.

 

Compensation Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

 

At present, we do not have employment agreements in place forOn February 10, 2020, our current executive officers. We have determined to continuecompensation committee approved the following compensation arrangements that were in placefor 2020 for each of Messrs. Daes, Daes, and Giraldo: (i) with respect to each of Messrs. Daes and Daes, with ES and Tecnoglass, respectively, prior to the Business Combination in December 2013 providing for an annuala base salary of $720,000,$1,260,000 plus a bonus of up to $315,000; and (ii) with respect to provide an annualMr. Giraldo, a base salary to Mr. Fernandez equal to approximately $140,000. Fluctuation of the exact compensationequivalent of $190,037 as of December 31, 2019 payable in Colombian Pesos and a bonus of up to $57,750 per year is subject to local currency. Our Compensation Committee may determine to award a discretionary cash bonus to such executive officers as has been awarded inyear. Each of the past by Tecnoglassbonuses will be based on our 2020 financial performance and ES, and may also determine to award to such executive officers share options, share appreciation rights or other awards under our 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. We anticipate continuing these compensation arrangements until we enter into employment agreements with our executive officers. Upon entry into employment agreements with our executive officers, we will file a Current Report on Form 8-K to discloseachievement of certain to-be-agreed upon targets throughout the material terms of such agreements.year.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

 

As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had not granted any share options, share appreciation rights or any other awards under long-term incentive plans to any of our executive officers.

 

Director Compensation

 

ForEach of our non-employee directors receives cash compensation of $52,000 each year. Additionally, our chairwoman of the Audit Committee and each other member of our Audit Committee receives additional cash compensation of $16,640 and $8,320, respectively, for serving on our Audit Committee. Non-employee directors do not receive cash compensation for their service.

The following table summarizes the compensation of our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2015, we did not compensate any of our directors for their service on the board. However, we did reimburse our directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Additionally, in October 2015, the Company authorized to grant each non-employee director $50,000 worth of ordinary shares of the Company payable annually. The first payment was made in October 2016. In November 2016 the Company authorized additional payment of $8,000 on an annual basis to members of the Company´s Audit Committee and $18,000 on an annual basis to the chair of the Audit Committee, all of whom are members of the Board of Directors.2019.

Name 

Fees earned or

paid in cash

  

Stock

Awards

  Total 
Martha L. Byorum $68,640   -  $68,640 
Luis Fernando Castro Vergara $54,773   -  $54,773 
Julio A. Torres $60,320   -  $60,320 
Carlos Cure $17,333   -  $17,333 
A. Lorne Weil $52,000   -  $52,000 
Samuel Azout $40,213   -  $40,213 

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

 

The following table setsand accompanying footnotes set forth certain information based on public filings or information known to Tecnoglass as of December 31, 2016 regardingJanuary 30, 2020 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares by:

 

Eacheach person known to be the beneficial owner ofor group who beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding ordinary shares;
Each directoreach of our executive officers and each named executive officer;directors; and
All currentall of our directors and executive officers and directors as a group.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, we believeA person is deemed to be the “beneficial owner” of a security if that all persons named inperson has or shares “voting power,” which includes the table have solepower to vote or to direct the voting and investmentof such security, or “investment power, with respect” which includes the power to all ordinary shares beneficially owned by them. This table is prepared solely based on information supplieddispose of or to us bydirect the listed beneficial owners, any Schedules 13D or 13G and other public documents filed with the SEC. The percentagedisposition of beneficial ownership is calculated based on 33,172,144 ordinary shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016.such security.

 Amount and Approximate  Amount and  Approximate 
 Nature Percentage of  Nature  Percentage of 
 of Beneficial Beneficial  of Beneficial  Beneficial 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) Ownership Ownership  Ownership  Ownership 
           
Directors and Named Executive Officers                
                
Jose M. Daes  227,664(2)  *   275,810(2)  * 
Chief Executive Officer and Director                
Christian T. Daes  168,912(2)  *   204,632(2)  * 
Chief Operating Officer and Director                
Samuel R. Azout  4,374   * 
Carlos Cure Cure  0   * 
Director                
Juan Carlos Vilariño  20,251   * 
Luis F. Castro Vergara  0   * 
Director                
Joaquin F. Fernandez  21,621,442(3)  65,18%
Chief Financial Officer        
A. Lorne Weil  99,902(4)  *     106,974(3)  * 
Chairman of the Board                
Julio A. Torres  104,374   *     105,520   * 
Director                
Martha L. Byorum  115,579   *     72,564   * 
Director                
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)  22,362,498   67,41%  765,500   1.7%
Five Percent Holders:               
Energy Holding Corporation  21,621,442(3)  65,18%  26,103,937(4)  56.6%

Red Oak Partners, LLC

304 Park Avenue South, 11th Floor, New York NY 10010

  1,969,021   5,94%

 

* Less than 1%

 

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each of the individuals is Avenida Circunvalar a 100 mts de la Via 40, Barrio Las Flores, Barranquilla, Colombia.
  
(2)Does not include shares held by Energy Holding Corporation, in which this person has an indirect ownership interest.
  
(3)Represents all ordinary shares held by Energy Holding Corporation, of which Messrs. Joaquin Fernandez and Alberto Velilla Becerra are directors and may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over such shares.
(4)Does not include 253,000 ordinary shares held by Child’s Trust f/b/o Francesca Weil u/a dated March 4, 2010 and 253,000 ordinary shares held by Child’s Trust f/b/o Alexander Weil u/a dated March 4, 2010, irrevocable trusts established for the benefit of Mr. Weil’s children.
(4)

Joaquin Fernandez and Alberto Velilla Becerra are the directors of Energy Holding Corporation and may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over such shares.

52

 

Equity Compensation PlansPlan Information

 

CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in first column
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders--1,593,917
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders---
Total--1,593,917
Plan Category 

Number of securities to

be issued upon exercise

of outstanding options,

warrants and rights

  

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

  

Number of securities remaining

available for future issuance

under equity compensation plans

(excluding securities

reflected in

the first column)

 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders        1,593,917(1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
Total        1,593,917 

 

(1) On December 20, 2013, our shareholders approved our 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“2013 Plan”).Plan. Under the 2013 Plan,this plan, 1,593,917 ordinary shares are reserved for issuance in accordance with the plan’s terms to eligible employees, officers, directors and consultants. As of December 31, 2016,2019, no awards had been made under the 2013 Plan.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

 

Related Transactions

E.S. Windows, LLC

As part of our strategy to vertically integrate our operations, on December 2, 2016 we acquired 100% of the stock of ESW, 85.06% of which was acquired directly by Tecnoglass and 14.94% by our subsidiary ES, for a total purchase price of $13.5 million, which consisted of (i) 734,400 ordinary shares issued in connection with the transaction for approximately $9.2 million based on a stock price of $12.50, (ii) approximately $2.3 million in cash and (iii) approximately $2.0 million related to the assignment of certain accounts receivable. This transaction is not considered a significant acquisition, as defined under Rule 1-02 (W) of Regulation S-X, and was accounted for as a common control acquisition under ASC 805.

In accordance with procedures established in our Code of Ethics, the transaction was approved by our Audit Committee, comprised exclusively of independent directors, and consummation of the transaction was ratified by our full Board of Directors and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

 

Ventanas Solar S.A.

 

Ventanas Solar S.A., a Panamasociedad anonima, is an importer and installer of the Company’s products in Panama. Family members of the Company’s CEO and COO and other related parties own 100% of the equity in US.VS. The Company’s sales to VS for the year ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were $8.3$3.3 million and $5.4$2.9 million, respectively. Outstanding receivables from VS at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were $9.1$6.0 million and $9.4$6.2 million, respectively.

We intend to directly or indirectly acquire 100%respectively, as a portion of the stock of VSreceivables is tied up in the near future, likely during the first half of 2017. Following the procedures established in our Code of Ethics, we also expect the terms of such transaction, when available, to be subject to review and approval by our Audit Committee and our Board of Directors based on analysis conducted by external advisor.retainage.

 

Business Combination ConsiderationVidrio Andino Joint Venture

 

Energy Holding Corporation, the sole shareholder of Tecnoglass Holding whose shareholders are all of the former shareholders of Tecnoglass and ES, received 20,567,141 ordinary shares in consideration of all of the outstanding and issued ordinary shares of Tecnoglass Holding.

Pursuant to theOn May 3, 2019, we consummated a joint venture agreement and plan of reorganization, we issued to Energy Holding Corp. an aggregate of 500,000 ordinary shares based on its achievement of specified EBITDA targets set forth in such agreement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, 1,000,000 ordinary shares upon achievement of specified EBITDA targetswith Saint-Gobain, a world leader in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015production of float glass, a key component of our manufacturing process, whereby we adquired a 25.8% minority ownership interest in Vidrio Andino, a Colombia-based subsidiary of Saint-Gobain. The purchase price for our interest in Vidrio Andino was $45 million, of wich $34.1 million was paid in cash and 1,500,000 ordinary shares upon achievement$10.9 million to be paid through the contribution of specified EBITDA targetsland on our behalf by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, José M. Daes and Christian T. Daes. in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.first quarter of 2020.

 

Indemnification Agreements

Effective March 5, 2014, we entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and members of our board of directors. The indemnification agreements supplement our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association and Cayman Islands law in providing certain indemnification rights to these individuals. The indemnification agreements provide, among other things that we will indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted by Cayman Islands law and to any greater extent that Cayman Islands law may in the future permit, including the advancement of attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred by such individuals in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or other proceeding, whether of a civil, criminal, administrative, regulatory, legislative or investigative nature, relating to any occurrence or event before or after the date of the indemnification agreements, by reason of the fact that such individuals is or were our directors or executive officers, subject to certain exclusions and procedures set forth in the indemnification agreements, including the absence of fraud or willful default on the part of the indemnitee and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, that the indemnitee had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

Private Placement with Affiliate of A. Lorne Weil

On March 5, 2014, we entered into a subscription agreement with an affiliate of A. Lorne Weil, our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, pursuant to which such affiliate agreed to purchase an aggregate of 95,693 ordinary shares at an aggregate price of $1,000,000, or approximately $10.45 per share, representing a slight premium to the closing price of our ordinary shares immediately prior to the execution of the subscription agreement. The closing of the purchase took place on March 14, 2014. A registration statement covering the resale of these shares was originally declared effective on June 16, 2014.

Related Person Policy

 

Our Code of EthicsConduct requires us to avoid, wherever possible, all related party transactions that could result in actual or potential conflicts of interests, except under guidelines approved by the board of directors (or the audit committee). Related-party transactions are defined as transactions in which (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year, (2) we or any of our subsidiaries are a participant, and (3) any (a) executive officer, director or nominee for election as a director, (b) greater than 5% beneficial owner of our ordinary shares, or (c) immediate family member, of the persons referred to in clauses (a) and (b), has or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a less than 10% beneficial owner of another entity). A conflict of interest situation can arise when a person takes actions or has interests that may make it difficult to perform his or her work objectively and effectively. Conflicts of interest may also arise if a person, or a member of his or her family, receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position.

 

Our audit committee, pursuant to its written charter, is responsible for reviewing and approving material or significant related-party transactions to the extent we enter into such transactions. The audit committee will consider all relevant factors when determining whether to approve a related party transaction, including whether the related party transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction. No director may participate in the approval of any transaction in which he is a related party, but that director is required to provide the audit committee with all material information concerning the transaction. Additionally, we require each of our directors and executive officers to complete an annual directors’ and officers’ questionnairesquestionnaire that elicitelicits information about related party transactions.

These procedures are intended to determine whether any such related party transaction impairs the independence of a director or presents a conflict of interest on the part of a director, employee or officer.

 

Director Independence

 

We adhere to the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market listing standards in determining whether a director is independent. Our board of directors consults with its counsel to ensure that the board’s determinations are consistent with those rules and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the independence of directors.

 

The NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market listing standards define an “independent director” as a person, other than an executive officer of a company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the issuer’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Consistent with these considerations, we have affirmatively determined that Messrs. Weil, Azout, Vilariño,Cure Cure, Castro Vergara, Torres and Ms. Byorum qualify as independent directors. Our independent directors have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The following fees were paid to PwC for services rendered in years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Audit Fees(1) $944,969  $885,669 
Audit-Related Fees(2)  70,797   190,109 
All Other Fees(3)  2,700   3,398 
Total Fees $1,018,466  $1,079,176 

(1) Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services by PwC for audit and quarterly review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and related services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2) Audit-related fees represent the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related professional services rendered by PwC that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees,” including the issuance of consents in connection with registration statement filings with the SEC and comfort letters in connection with securities offerings.

(3) Other fees represent fees billed for professional services rendered by PwC in connection with subscription to information services and training.

 

Item 14.Principal Accounting FeesPre-Approval Policies and Services.

Effective December 30, 2014,Procedures. In accordance with Section 10A(i) of the firmSecurities Exchange Act of PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda. acts1934, as amended, before we engage our independent registered public accounting firm. Priorfirm to December 30, 2014,render audit or non-audit services, the firmengagement is approved by our audit committee. Our audit committee approved all of Marcum LLP acted as our independent registered public accounting firm.the fees referred to in the rows titled “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” and “All Other Fees” in the table above.

 

During 2016,Representatives of PwC are expected to attend the Company paid $0.9 millionannual general meeting. The representatives will have an opportunity to PWCmake any statements and less than $0.1 millionwill be available to Marcum for audit and audit related fees. During 2015, the Company paid $0.6 millionrespond to PwC and $0.1 million to Marcum for audit and audit related fees.appropriate questions from shareholders.

 

Audit Committee Approval

 

Our audit committee pre-approved all the services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopersPwC Contadores y Auditores Ltda. and Marcum LLP. In accordance with Section 10A(i) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, before we engage our independent accountant to render audit or non-audit services on a going-forward basis, the engagement will be approved by our audit committee.

PART IV

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

 

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
  
(1)Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

 Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Balance SheetsF-3
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive IncomeF-4
Statements of Shareholders’ EquityF-5
Statements of Cash FlowsF-6
Notes to Financial StatementsF-7

 

(2)Financial Statement Schedules:

 

None.

 

(3)The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-K

 

Exhibit

No.

 Description Included Form Filing Date
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of August 17, 2013 and as amended November 6, 2013, by and among the Company, Andina Merger Sub, Inc., Tecnoglass S.A., C.I. Energia Solar S.A. E.S. Windows and Tecno Corporation By Reference Schedule 14A December 4, 2013
3.1 Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. By Reference Schedule 14A December 4, 2013
4.1 Specimen Ordinary Share Certificate. By Reference S-1/A January 23, 2012
4.2 Specimen Warrant Certificate. By Reference S-1/A December 28, 2011
4.3 Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Company. By Reference 8-K March 22, 2012
4.4 FormDescription of First Unit Purchase Option issued to EarlyBirdCapital, Inc.the Company’s Securities By Reference S-1/A March 12, 2012
4.5Form of Second Unit Purchase Option issued to EarlyBirdCapital, Inc.By ReferenceS-1/AMarch 7, 2012
10.1 Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement among the Company, the Initial Shareholders and Energy Holding Corporation. By Reference 8-K December 27, 2013
10.2 Indemnity Escrow Agreement dated as of December 20, 2013, by and among the Company, Representative, Committee and Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company.By Reference8-KDecember 27, 2013
10.3Additional Shares Escrow Agreement dated as of December 20, 2013, by and among the Company, Representative, Committee and Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company.By Reference8-KDecember 27, 2013
10.4Form of Lock-Up Agreement between the Company and Energy Holding CorporationBy Reference8-KAugust 22, 2013
10.52013 Long-Term Incentive Equity Plan By Reference Schedule 14A December 4, 2013
10.610.3 Form of Subscription AgreementBy Reference8-KDecember 19, 2013
10.7Form of Indemnification Agreement By Reference 8-K March 6, 2014
10.710.4 

PurchaseSettlement Agreement, with E.S. Windows, LLC

dated June 30, 2018, between the Company and Giovanni Monti
 

Herewith

By Reference
 Form 10-K  March 8, 2019
10.5Investment Agreement dated January 11, 2019, by and among Tecnoglass Inc., Holding Concorde S.A.S., Saint-Gobain Colombia S.A.S., Saint-Gobain Cristaleria S.L., and Pilkington International Holdings B.V.By Reference8-KJanuary 11, 2019
21 List of subsidiaries. Herewith    
24 Power of Attorney (included on signature page of this Form 10-K). Herewith    

Exhibit

No.

23.1
 DescriptionConsent of PwC Contadores y Auditores Ltda. IncludedHerewith Form Filing Date
31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Herewith    
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Herewith    
32 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Herewith    

 

101.INS XBRL Instance Document Herewith 
      
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Herewith 
      
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Herewith 
      
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Herewith 
      
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Herewith 
      
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Herewith 

Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.

 

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 10th6th day of March, 2017.2020.

 

 TECNOGLASS INC.
   
 By:/s/ Joaquin FernandezSantiago Giraldo
 Name:Joaquin FernandezSantiago Giraldo
 Title:Chief Financial Officer (Principal
  Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

The undersigned directors and officers of Tecnoglass Inc. hereby constitute and appoint Jose Daes and Joaquin FernandezSantiago Giraldo with full power to act as our true and lawful attorney-in-fact with full power to execute in our name and behalf in the capacities indicated below, this annual report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby ratify and confirm all that such attorneys-in-fact, or any of them, or their substitutes shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Name Title Date
     
/s/ Jose M. Daes Chief Executive Officer March 10, 20176, 2020
Jose M. Daes (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ Christian T. Daes Chief Operating Officer March 10, 20176, 2020
Christian T. Daes    
     
/s/ Joaquin FernandezSantiago Giraldo Chief Financial Officer March 10, 20176, 2020
Joaquin FernandezSantiago Giraldo (PrincipalFinancial and Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ A. Lorne Weil Director (Non-Executive Chairman) March 10, 20176, 2020
A. Lorne Weil    
     
/s/ Samuel R. Azout Director March 10, 20176, 2020
Samuel R. Azout    
     
/s/ Juan Carlos VilariñoLuis Fernando Castro Director March 10, 20176, 2020
Juan Carlos Vilariño    
     
/s/ Martha Byorum Director March 10, 20176, 2020
Martha Byorum    
     
/s/ Julio A. Torres Director March 10, 20176, 2020
Julio A. Torres    

 

 3657 
 

 

Tecnoglass Inc.

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 Page
Audited Financial Statements: 
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018F-3F-4
  
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018F-4F-5
  
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018F-5F-6
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20162019, and 20152018F-6F-7
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7F-8

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Tecnoglass Inc. and Subsidiaries

 

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In our opinion,

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tecnoglass Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tecnoglass Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20162019, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. TheseAlso in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, are the responsibilityfor maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the Company’s management.effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinions on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Tecnoglass Inc.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltda.A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersBecause of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PwC Contadores y Auditores Ltda.

Barranquilla,Bogotá, Colombia

March 10, 20176, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

 

F-2F-3
 

Tecnoglass Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 
      December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 
ASSETS                
Current assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents $26,918  $22,671  $47,862  $33,040 
Investments  1,537   1,470   2,304   1,163 
Trade accounts receivable, net  92,297   67,080   110,558   92,791 
Unbilled receivables on uncompleted contracts  6,625   9,868 
Due from related parties  10,995   10,186   8,057   8,239 
Other assets  16,089   7,798 
Inventories  55,092   48,741   82,714   91,849 
Prepaid expenses  1,183   3,353 
Contract assets – current portion  42,014   46,018 
Other current assets  29,340   20,299 
Total current assets  

210,736

   171,167  $322,849  $293,399 
                
Long term assets:                
Property, plant and equipment, net  170,797   135,974  $154,609  $149,199 
Long term receivables from related parties  -   2,536 
Deferred income taxes  4,595   4,770 
Contract assets – non-current  7,059   6,986 
Due from related parties - long term  1,786   - 
Intangible assets  4,555   3,344   6,703   9,006 
Goodwill  1,330   1,330   23,561   23,561 
Deferred income taxes  -   640 
Long term investments  45,596   - 
Other long term assets  7,312   6,420   2,910   2,853 
Total long term assets  183,994   150,244   246,819   196,375 
Total assets $394,730  $

321,411

  $569,668  $489,774 
                
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
Current liabilities        
Current liabilities:        
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt $2,651  $17,571  $16,084  $21,606 
Trade accounts payable  42,546   38,981 
Dividend Payable  3,486   - 
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses  61,878   65,510 
Accrued interest expense  7,645   7,567 
Due to related parties  3,668   1,362   4,415   1,500 
Taxes payable  16,845   18,277 
Labor liabilities  1,410   918 
Warrant liability  -   31,213 
Earnout share liability  -   13,740 
Current portion of customer advances on uncompleted contracts  7,780   11,841 
Dividends payable  67   736 
Contract liability – current portion  12,459   16,789 
Due to equity partners  10,900   - 
Other current liabilities  15,563   8,887 
Total current liabilities  78,386   133,903  $129,011  $122,595 
                
Earnout share liability  -   20,414 
Long term liabilities:        
Deferred income taxes  3,523   3,384  $411  $2,706 
Customer advances on uncompleted contracts  2,310   4,404 
Long-term debt  196,946   121,493 
Long term payable associated to GM&P acquisition  8,500   8,500 
Long term liabilities from related parties  622   600 
Contract liability – non-current  187   1,436 
Long term debt  243,727   220,709 
Total long term liabilities  202,779   

149,695

   253,447   233,951 
Total liabilities $281,165  $283,598  $382,458  $356,546 
                
Commitments and contingencies        
        
Shareholders’ equity        
Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015 $-  $- 
Ordinary shares, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 33,172,144 and 26,895,636 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively  3   3 
Legal reserves  1,367   1,367 
Additional paid capital  114,847   45,584 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 respectively $-  $- 
Ordinary shares, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 46,117,631 and 38,092,996 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively  5   4 
Legal Reserves  1,367   1,367 
Additional paid-in capital  208,283   157,604 
Retained earnings  26,548   22,028   16,213   10,439 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  (29,200)  (31,169)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)  (39,264)  (37,058)
Shareholders’ equity attributable to controlling interest  186,604   132,356 
Shareholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interest  606   872 
Total shareholders’ equity  113,565   37,813   187,210   133,228 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $394,730  $321,411  $569,668  $489,774 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Tecnoglass Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
       
Operating revenue:        
Customers $295,274  $232,297 
Related Parties  9,742   9,942 
Total Operating Revenue  305,016   242,239 
         
Cost of sales  192,369   151,381 
Gross profit  112,647   90,858 
         
Operating expenses:        
Selling  32,267   27,603 
Provision for bad debts and write offs  4,686   1,477 
General and administration  27,846   22,186 
Operating expenses  64,799   51,267 
         
Operating income  47,848   39,591 
         
Change in fair value of warrant liability  776   (24,901)
Change in fair value of earnout shares liability  4,674   (10,858)
Non-operating income, net  4,155   5,054 
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)  (1,387)  10,059 
Interest expense  (16,814)  (9,274)
         
Income before taxes  39,252   9,671 
         
Income tax provision  16,072   20,691 
Net income (loss) $23,180  $(11,020)
         
Comprehensive income:        
Net income (loss) $23,180  $

(11,020

)
Foreign currency translation adjustments  1,969   (19,738)
Total comprehensive income (loss) $25,149  $(30,758)
         
Basic income (loss) per share $0.79  $(0.42)
         
Diluted income (loss) per share $0.77  $(0.42)
         
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  29,231,054   26,454,469 
         
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  30,253,068   26,454,469 
  Years ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Operating revenues:        
External customers $422,118  $365,646 
Related parties  8,794   5,338 
Total operating revenues  430,912   370,984 
Cost of sales  295,103   250,767 
Gross profit  135,809   120,217 
         
Operating expenses:        
Selling expense  (41,925)  (39,390)
General and administrative expense  (35,069)  (33,632)
Total operating expenses  (76,994)  (73,022)
         
Operating income  58,815   47,195 
         
Non-operating income  1,565   2,915 
Equity method income  596   - 
Foreign currency transactions losses  (973)  (14,461)
Interest expense and deferred cost of financing  (22,806)  (21,187)
         
Income before taxes  37,197   14,462 
         
Income tax provision  (12,928)  (5,976)
         
Net income $24,269  $8,486 
         
Loss attributable to non-controlling interest  266   545 
         
Income attributable to parent $24,535  $9,031 
         
Comprehensive income:        
Net income $24,269  $8,486 
Foreign currency translation adjustments  (2,715)  (8,407)
Chase in fair value derivative contracts  509   - 
         
Total comprehensive income $22,063  $79 
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest  266   545 
         
Total comprehensive income attributable to parent $22,329  $624 
         
Basic income per share $0.55  $0.22 
         
Diluted income per share $0.55  $0.21 
         
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  44,464,097   39,087,527 
         
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  44,464,097   39,487,940 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-4F-5
 

Tecnoglass, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018

(In thousands, except share data)

 

  Ordinary Shares, $0.0001  Additional       Accumulated Other  Total 
  Par Value  Paid in  Legal  Retained  Comprehensive  Shareholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Reserve  Earnings  Loss  Equity 
Balance at January 1, 2015  24,801,132  2  $26,140  1,367  

30,119

  (11,431) 

46,197

 
                             
Acquisition of entity under common control  

734,400

   -   -   -   

4,338

   -   

4,338

 
Issuance of common stock  500,000   -   5,765   -   -   -   5,765 
                             
Exercise of warrants  1,001,848   1   13,679   -   -   -   13,680 
                             
Exercise of Unit Purchase Options  592,656   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                             
ESWindows distributions before acquisition  -   -   -   -   (1,409)  -   (1,409)
                             
Foreign currency translation  -   -   -   -   -   (19,738)  (19,738)
                             
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (11,020)  -   (11,020)
                             
Balance at December 31, 2015  27,630,036  3  45,584  1,367  22,028  (31,169) 37,813 
                             
Acquisition of entity under common control  -   -   (4,320)  -   -   -   (4,320)
                             
Issuance of common stock  2,500,000   -   30,279   -   -   -   30,279 
                             
Stock dividend  272,505   -   12,171   -   (12,171)  -   - 
                             
Cash dividend  -   -   -   -   (4,226)  -   (4,226)
                             
Exercise of warrants  2,690,261   -   30,437   -   -   -   30,437 
                             
Exercise of Unit Purchase Options  58,297   -   404   -   -   -   404 
                             
Share based compensation  21,045   -   292   -   -   -   292 
                             
ESWindows distributions before acquisition  -   -   -  -   (2,263)  -   (2,263)
                             
Foreign currency translation  -   -   -   -   -   1,969   1,969 
                             
Net Income  -   -   -   -   23,180   -   23,180 
                             
Balance at December 31, 2016  33,172,144  3  114,847  1,367  26,548  (29,200) 113,565 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Tecnoglass Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net income (loss) $23,180  $(11,020)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:        
Provision for bad debts  4,686   1,477 
Provision for obsolete inventory  238   (255)
Change in fair value of investments held for trading  (33)  10 
Depreciation and amortization  15,522   12,464 
(Gain)Loss on disposition of assets  (477)  232 
Change in value of derivative liability  (21)  (69)
Change in fair value of earnout share liability  (4,674)  10,858 
Change in fair value of warrant liability  (776)  24,901 
Director Stock compensation  300   - 
Deferred income taxes  (247)  (119)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:        
Trade Accounts Receivable  (25,979)  (29,394)
Deferred income taxes  -   - 
Inventories  (4,305)  (29,185)
Prepaid expenses  799   (1,503)
Other assets  (6,425)  (12,203)
Trade accounts payable  1,574   15,423 
Taxes payable  (2,299)  14,055 
Labor liabilities  439   221 
Related parties  2,259   295 
Advances from customers  (6,846)  6,323 
CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES (3,085) 2,511 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from sale of investments  24,486   1,913 
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment  686   4,470 
Purchase of investments  (26,975)  (877)
Acquisition of property and equipment  (22,906)  (14,901)
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES (24,709) (9,395)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from debt  196,468   113,274 
Proceeds from the exercise of unit purchase options  404   - 
Dividend distribution  (741)  - 
ESW LLC distributions prior to acquisition  (2,263)  (1,409)
Proceeds from the exercise of warrants  800   - 
Repayments of debt and capital leases  (163,126)  (102,356)
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 31,542  9,509 
         
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  499   720 
         
NET INCREASE IN CASH  4,247   3,345 
CASH - Beginning of year  22,671   19,326 
CASH - End of year $26,918  $22,671 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION        
Cash paid during the year for:        
Interest $8,696  $6,916 
Taxes $25,825  $13,212 
         
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITES:        
Assets acquired under capital lease and financial obligations $19,641  $65,319 
Payable to former shareholders of ESW LLC $2,303  $- 
 

Ordinary Shares, $0.0001

Par Value

  Additional Paid in  Legal  Retained  Accumulated Other Comprehensive  Total Shareholders’  Non-Controlling  

Total

Shareholders’ Equity and Non-Controlling

 
 Shares  Amount  Capital  Reserve  Earnings  Loss  Equity  Interest  Interest 
Balance at December 31, 2017  34,836,575   3   125,317   1,367   22,212   (28,651)  120,248   1,417   121,665 
                                     
Issuance of common stock  1,242,659   1   14,534   -   -   -   14,535   -   14,535 
                                     
Adoption ASC 606  -   -   -   -   (187)  -   (187)  -   (187)
                                     
Stock dividend  2,013,762   -   17,753   -   (20,617)  -   (2,864)  -   (2,864)
                                     
Foreign currency translation  -   -   -   -   -   (8,407)  (8,407)  -   (8,407)
                                     
Net income  -   -   -   -   9,031   -   9,031   (545)  8,486 
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2018  38,092,996   4   157,604   1,367   10,439   (37,058)  132,356   872   133,228 
                                     
Issuance of common stock  5,551,423   -   36,478   -   -   -   36,478   -   36,478 
                                     
Stock dividend  2,473,212   1   14,201   -   (18,761)  -   (4,559)  -   (4,559)
                                     
Derivative financial instruments  -   -   -   -   -   509   509       509 
                                     
Foreign currency translation  -   -   -   -   -   (2,715)  (2,715)  (267)  (2,982)
                                     
Net income  -   -   -   -   24,535   -   24,535       24,535 
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2019  46,117,631   5   208,283   1,367   16,213   (39,264)  186,604   606   187,210 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6

Tecnoglass Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net income $24,269  $8,486 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Provision for bad debts  1,389   369 
Depreciation and amortization  22,735   23,157 
Deferred income taxes  (2,698)  (3,289)
Equity method income  (596)  - 
Deferred cost of financing  1,624   1,468 
Other non-cash adjustments  82   (142)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Trade accounts receivables  (19,615)  (23,700)
Inventories  8,419   (28,064)
Prepaid expenses  (3,328)  (1,161)
Other assets  (7,744)  (4,645)
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses  (2,396)  34,588 
Accrued interest expense  83   466 
Taxes payable  5,075   (4,315)
Labor liabilities  (19)  340 
Contract assets and liabilities  (1,674)  (8,566)
Related parties  1,133   (23)
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES $26,739  $(5,031)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from sale of investments  1,583   1,575 
Acquisition of businesses  (34,100)  (6,000)
Purchase of investments  (1,684)  (1,184)
Acquisition of property and equipment  (24,952)  (13,117)
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES $(59,153) $(18,726)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from debt  45,527   28,600 
Cash dividend  (5,227)  (2,714)
Proceeds from equity offering  36,478   - 
Repayments of debt  (29,507)  (8,860)
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES $47,271  $17,026 
         
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents $(35) $(1,152)
         
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  14,822   (7,883)
CASH - Beginning of period  33,040   40,923 
CASH - End of period $47,862  $33,040 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION        
Cash paid during the period for:        
Interest $19,660  $18,223 
Income Tax $12,296  $8,399 
         
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Assets acquired under credit or debt $1,222  $447 
Gain in extinguishment of GM&P payment settlement $-  $3,606 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Tecnoglass Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 Note 1.General

 

Business Description

 

Tecnoglass Inc. (“TGI,, a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Company”, “Tecnoglass,the “Company,“TGI,” “we, “us” or “our”) was incorporated in the Cayman Islands on September 21, 2011 under the name “Andina Acquisition Corporation” (“Andina”) as a blank check company. Andina’s registration statement for its initial public offering (the “Public Offering”) was declared effective on March 16, 2012. Andina consummated the Public Offering, the private placement of warrants (“Private Placement”) and the sale of options to the Underwriters on March 22, 2012, receiving proceeds, net of transaction costs, of $43,163, of which $42,740 was placed in a trust account.

Andina’s objective was to acquire, through a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination, one or more operating businesses. On December 20, 2013, Andina consummated a merger transaction (the “Merger”) with Tecno Corporation (“Tecnoglass Holding”) as ultimate parent of Tecnoglass S.A. (“TG”) and C.I. Energía Solar S.A. ES. Windows (“ES”). The surviving entity was renamed Tecnoglass Inc. The Merger transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger and recapitalization where Tecnoglass Holding was the acquirer and TGI was the acquired company.

The Company manufactures hi-specification, architectural glass and windows for the global residential and commercial construction industries. Currently the Company offers design, production, marketing, and installation of architectural systems for buildings of high, medium and low elevation size. Products include windows and doors inglass and aluminum, office partitions and interior divisions, floating façadesfacades and commercial window showcases. The Company sells to customers in North, Central and South America, and exports about half of its production to foreign countries.

 

TGThe Company manufactures both glass and aluminum products. Its glass products include tempered glass, laminated glass, thermo-acoustic glass, curved glass, silk-screened glass, acoustic glass and digital print glass. Its Alutions plant produces mill finished, anodized, painted aluminum profiles and rods, tubes, bars and plates. Alutions’ operations include extrusion, smelting, painting and anodizing processes, and exporting, importing and marketing aluminum products.

 

ESThe Company also designs, manufactures, markets and installs architectural systems for high, medium and low rise construction, glass and aluminum windows and doors, office dividers and interiors, floating facades and commercial display windows.

 

In 2014, the Company established two Florida limited liability companies, Tecnoglass LLC (“Tecno LLC”) and Tecnoglass RE LLC (“Tecno RE”) to acquire manufacturing facilities, manufacturing machinery and equipment, customer lists and exclusive design permits.

In December 2016, as part of our strategy to vertically integrate our operations, we acquired 100% of the stock of ESW LLC, 85.06% of which was acquired directly by Tecnoglass and 14.94% by our subsidiary ES, for a total purchase price of $13.5 million, which consisted of (i) 734,400 ordinary shares issued in connection with the transaction for approximately $9.2 million based on a stock price of $12.50, (ii) approximately $2.3 million in cash, and (iii) approximately US$2.0 million related to the assignment of certain accounts receivable.

The Acquisition is deemed to be a transaction between entities under common control, which, under applicable accounting guidelines, requires the assets and liabilities to be transferred at historical cost of the entity, with prior periods retroactively adjusted to furnish comparative information. See Note 3, Acquisitions within the Notes to these Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

 Note 2.

Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation and Management’s Estimates

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and pursuant to the accounting and disclosure rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Prior year financial information has been retroactively adjusted for an acquisition under common control. As the acquisition of ESW LLC was deemed to be a transaction between entities under common control, the assets and liabilities were transferred at the historical cost of ESW LLC, with prior periods retroactively adjusted to include the historical financial results of the acquired company for the period they were controlled by ESW LLC in the Company’s financial statements. The accompanying financial statements and related notes have been retroactively adjusted to include the historical results and financial position of the acquired company prior to the acquisition date during the periods the assets were under common control. All financial information presented for the periods after the ESW LLC acquisition represent the consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Company with retroactive adjustments of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the acquired company during the periods the assets were under common control.

F-7

 

The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Company’s financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Estimates inherent in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements relate to the collectability of account receivables, the valuation of inventories, estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts, useful lives and potential impairment of long-lived assets, and valuation of warrants and other derivative financial instruments.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

These audited consolidated financial statements consolidate TGI, its indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries TG,Tecnoglass S.A.S (“TG”), C.I. Energía Solar S.A.S E.S. Windows (“ES”), ES and Windows LLC (“ESW LLC”), Tecnoglass LLC and its direct subsidiaries (“Tecno LLC andLLC”), Tecno RE LLC (“Tecno RE”), GM&P Consulting and Glazing Contractors (“GM&P”), Componenti USA LLC (“Componenti”) and ES Metals SAS (“ES Metals”), which are entities in which we have a controlling financial interest because we hold a majority voting interest. To determine if we hold a controlling financial interest in an entity, we first evaluate if we are required to apply the variable interest entity (“VIE”) model to the entity, otherwise the entity is evaluated under the voting interest model. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation, including unrealized intercompany profits and losses. The equity method of accounting is used for investments in affiliates and other joint ventures over which the Company has significant influence but does not have effective control.

Non-controlling interest

When the Company owns a majority of a subsidiary’s stock, the Company includes in its consolidated financial statements the non-controlling interest in the subsidiary. The non-controlling interest in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income is equal to the non-controlling proportionate share of the subsidiary’s net income and, as included in Shareholders’ Equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, is equal to the non-controlling proportionate share of the subsidiary’s net assets.

 

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

 

The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars, the reporting currency. Our foreign subsidiaries’ local currency is the Colombian Peso, which is also their functional currency as determined by the market analysis, markets, costs and expenses, assets, liabilities, financing and cash flow indicators. As such, our subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date, with equity being translated at the historical rates. Revenues and expenses of our foreign subsidiaries are translated at the average exchange rates for the period. The resulting cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments from this process are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Therefore, the U.S. Dollar value of these items in our financial statements fluctuates from period to period.

 

Also, exchange gains and losses arising from transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the consolidated statement of operations as foreign exchange gains and losses within non-operating income, net.

The average exchange rate for the Colombian peso, the functional currency of the Company’s main subsidiaries, was 3,050.98 pesos per USD $1 and 2,743.39 pesos per USD $1 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The spot exchange rate for the Colombian peso, as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 201, was 3,000.71 pesos per USD $1 and 3,149.39 pesos per USD $1, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents include investments with original maturities of three months or less. As of December 31, 20162019, and 2015,2018, cash and cash equivalents were primarily comprised of deposits held in operating accounts in Colombia, Panama and United States. As of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 the Company had no restricted cash.

Investments

 

The Company’s investments are comprised of marketable securities, short term deposits and income producing real estate.

 

Investments which are held for trading are recorded at fair value and fluctuations in value are recorded as a non-operating income or expense. In addition, we have investments in long-term marketable equity securities which are classified as available-for-sale securities and are recorded at fair value.

 

Short- term deposits and other financial instruments with maturities greater than 90 days and shares in other companies that do not meet the requirements for equity method treatment are recorded for at cost.

 

We also have investments in income-producing real estate. This real estate is recorded at cost and is depreciated using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life. The depreciation and rental income associated with this real estate are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations. These investments are recorded within long term assets on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

Trade Accounts Receivable

 

Trade accounts receivable are recorded net of allowances for cash discounts for prompt payment, doubtful accounts and sales returns. The Company’s policy is to reserve for uncollectible accounts based on its best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in its existing accounts receivable. The Company periodically reviews its accounts receivable to determine whether an allowance for doubtful accounts is necessary based on an analysis of past due accounts and other factors that may indicate that the collectability of an account may be in doubt. Other factors that the Company considers include its existing contractual obligations, historical payment patterns of its customers and individual customer circumstances, and a review of the local economic environment and its potential impact on the collectability of accounts receivable. Account balances are deemed to be uncollectible and are writtencharged off afterwithin 90 days of having recored an allowance and all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company’s allowance for accounts receivable as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 amounted to $1.8 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

 

F-8

On certain fixed price contracts, a portion of the amounts billed are withheld by the customer as a retainage which typically amount to 10% of the invoiced amount and can remain outstanding for several months until a final good receipt of the complete project to the customers satisfaction.

 

Concentration of Risks and Uncertainties

 

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash and trade accounts receivable. The Company mitigates its cash risk by maintaining its cash deposits with major financial institutions in the United States and Colombia. At times the balances held at financial institutions in Colombia may exceed the Colombia government insured limits of the Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público. The Company has not experienced such losses in such accounts. As discussed above, the Company mitigates its risk to trade accounts receivable by performing on-going credit evaluations of its customers.

 

Related party transactions

 

The Company has related party transactions such as sales, purchases, leases, guarantees, and other payments. We periodically performed a related party analysis to identify transactions to disclose. Depending on the transactions, we aggregate some related party information by type.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories of raw materials, which consist primarily of purchased and processed glass, aluminum, parts and supplies held for use in the ordinary course of business, are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using a weighted-average method. Inventory consisting of certain job specific materials not yet installed (work in process) are valued using the specific identification method. Cost for finished product inventory are recorded and maintained at the lower of cost or market. Cost includes raw materials and direct and applicable indirect manufacturing overheads. Also, inventories related to contracts in progress are included within work in process and finished goods, and are stated at using the specific identification method and lower of cost or market, respectively, and are expected to turn over in less than one year.

 

Reserves for excess or slow-moving raw materials inventories are updated based on historical experience of a variety of factors including sales volume and levels of inventories at the end of the period. The Company does not maintain allowances for the lower of cost or market for inventories of finished products as its products are manufactured based on firm orders rather than built-to-stock. The Company’s reserve for excess or slow-moving inventory amounted to $157 and $0 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Significant improvements and renewals that extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized. Interest caused while acquired property is under construction and installation are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any related gains or losses are included in income as a reduction to or increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis, based on the following estimated useful lives:

 

Buildings20 years
Machinery and equipment10 years
Furniture and fixtures10 years
Office equipment and software5 years
Vehicles5 years

 

The Company also records within fixed assets all the underlying assets of a capital lease. Initial recognition of these assets are done at the present value of all future lease payments. A capital lease is a lease in which the lessor transferred substantially all of the benefits and risks associated with the ownership of the property.

 

Long Lived Assets

 

The Company periodically reviews the carrying values of its long lived assets when events or changes in circumstances would indicate that it is more likely than not that their carrying values may exceed their realizable values, and record impairment charges when considered necessary.

 

When circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred, the Company tests such assets for recoverability by comparing the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of such assets and their eventual disposition to their carrying amounts. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss, measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value, is recognized. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.

F-10

Goodwill

 

We review goodwill for impairment each year on December 31st or more frequently when events or significant changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Under ASC 350-20-35-4 through 35-8A, the goodwill impairment test requires a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit is greater than zero and its fair value exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. The Company has only one reporting unit and as such the impairment analysis was done by comparing the Company’s market capitalization with its book value of equity. As of our December 31, 2016,2019, the Company’s market capitalization substantially exceeded its book value of equity and as such no impairment of goodwill was indicated. See Note 7-11- Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional information.

 

Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis. We also review these intangibles for impairment when events or significant changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that indicate that impairment testing may be required include the loss of a significant customer,changes in building codes and regulation, loss of key personnel or a significant adverse change in business climate or regulations. There were no triggering events or circumstances noted and as such no impairment was needed for the intangible assets subject to amortization. See Note 711 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional information.

 

Common Stock Purchase WarrantsLeases

 

The Company classifies as equity any warrants contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contractWe determine if an event occursarrangement is a lease at inception. We include finance lease right-of-use assets as part of property and if that eventequipment and the lease liability as part of our current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Leases considered short-term are not capitalized, given our election not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities arising from short-term leases, but instead considered operating leases and the resulting rental expense is outside the Company’s control) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choicerecognized on our Consolidated Statement of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).Operations as incurred.

 

The Company assesses classification of its common stock purchase warrants and other freestanding derivatives, if any, at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification betweenFinance lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is required. As of December 20, 2016, the Company no longer has warrants outstanding.reasonably certain that we will exercise that option.

Financial Liabilities

 

Financial liabilities correspond to the financing obtained by the Company through bank credit facilities and accounts payable to suppliers and creditors. Financial liabilities are initially recognized based on their fair value, which is usually equal to the transaction value less directly attributable costs. Subsequently, such financial liabilities are carried at their amortized cost according to the effective interest rate method determined at initial recognition, and recognized in the results of the period during the time of amortization of the financial obligation.

 

Warrant liabilityDividends

 

An aggregate 9,200,000 warrants were issued as a result of the Public Offering, the Private Placement and the Merger. Of the aggregate total, 4,200,000 warrants were issued in connection with the Public Offering (“IPO Warrants”), 4,800,000 warrants were issued in connection with the Private Placement (“Insider Warrants”), and 200,000 warrants were issued upon conversion of a promissory note at the closing of the Merger (“Working Capital Warrants”). The Company classifies the warrant instrumentsWe have accounted for dividends declared as a liability at their fair value becauseunder ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, since our shareholders have had the warrants dooption to elect cash or stock. When the dividend has been declared, we record the transaction as a reduction to retained earnings and an increase to dividends payable. We then reclassify stock dividends from dividends payable to additional paid-in capital when the shareholder elects a stock dividend instead of cash. The dividend payable is not meet the criteria for equity treatment under guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7D. The aggregate liability is subject to re-measurementremeasurement at each balance sheet date since the dividend is a fixed monetary amount known at inception and adjusted at each reporting period until exercised or expired, and anythus no change in fair value adjustment is recognized in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.necessary.

 

When the warrants are exercised for ordinary shares, the Company re-measures the fair value of the exercised warrants as of the date of exercise using available fair value methods and records the change in fair value in the consolidated statement of operations, and records the fair value of the exercised warrants as additional paid in capital in the shareholders equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s warrants expired per their own terms on December 20, 2016 (See Note 15 – Warrant liability and Earnout Shares for additional information).

Earnout shares liability

In accordance withASC 815 - Derivatives and hedging, the earnout shares are not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and therefore are accounted for as a liability with fair value changes being recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Earnout shares are released from the escrow account upon achievement of the conditions set forth in the earnout share agreement. At this time the shares are recorded out of the earnout share liability and into common stock and additional paid in capital within the shareholders equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2016 there is no earnout shares liability recorded (See Note 15 – Warrant Liability and Earnout Share Liability for additional information).

Unit Purchase Options

The Unit Purchase Options (“UPOs”) are derivative contracts in the entity’s own equity in accordance with guidance in ASC 815-40, paragraphs 15-5 through 15-8 and are not accounted for as assets or liabilities requiring fair value estimates for the derivative contract in each reporting period.

The Company accounted for issued UPOs, at issuance date in March 2012, at their fair market value calculated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, including the amount of $500,100 received in cash payments, as an expense of the Public Offering resulting with a charge directly to shareholders’ equity.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, holders of UPO’s exercised 584,099 unit options (one share and one warrant) and simultaneously exercised the underlying warrants on a cashless basis, resulting in the issuance of 79,342 ordinary shares and proceeds of $404. Pursuant to the expiration of the Company’s ordinary warrants on December 20, 2016, the 8,559 UPO’s still outstanding as of December 31, 2016 will only result in the issuance of one share upon exercise until their expiration in March of 2017.

Because of the UPOs are accounted for in shareholders’ equity as instruments indexed to the Company’s own equity, and no cash or other consideration was received or liabilities were settled, there is no measurement or re-measurement of fair value for the purposes of reclassification out of retained earnings into additional paid in capital (see Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies).

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation in accordance withASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. ASC 718 requires compensation costs related to share-based transactions, including employee stock options, to be recognized based on fair value. The Company accounts for share-based awards exchanged for employee services at the estimated grant date fair value of the award. In October 2015, the Company authorized to grant each non-employee director $50,000 worth of ordinary shares of the Company payable annually and first payment was made in October 2016. In November 2016 the Company authorized additional payment of $8,000 on an annual basis to members of the Company´s audit Committee members and $18,000 on an annual basis to the chair of the audit committee, all of whom are members of the board of directors.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value, regardless of the purpose or intent for holding them. The Company has not designated its derivatives as hedging instruments; therefore, the Company does not designate them as fair value or cash flow hedging instruments. The accounting for changes in fair value of the derivatives is recorded within the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements, establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. We primarily apply the market approach for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is the price we would receive to sell and asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with a market participant at the measurement date. In the absence of active markets for identical assets or liabilities, such measurements involve developing assumptions based on market observable data and, in the absence of such data, internal information that is consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical transaction that occurs at the measurement date.

The standard describes three level of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

See Note 12 -15 – Hedging Activities and Fair Value Measurements.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The unrealized gains or losses arising from changes in fair value of derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, are recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Amounts in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet are reclassified into the consolidated statement of income in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions are settled.

Revenue Recognition

 

Our principal sources of revenue are derived from product sales, sometimes referred to as standard form sales, and supply and installation contracts, sometimes referred to as revenues from fixed price contracts. We identified one single performance obligation for both forms of manufactured glass and aluminum products.sales. Revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidencecontrol is transferred to our customers. For product sales, the performance obligations are satisfied at a point in time and control is deemed to be transferred upon delivery.

Approximately 38% of an arrangement existsthe Company’s consolidated net sales is generated by supply and installation contracts with customers that require the Company to design, develop, test, manufacture, and install windows according to the customers’ specifications. These contracts are primarily multi-year contracts with real estate general contractors and are generally priced on a fixed-price basis and are invoiced based on contract progress.

To determine the proper revenue recognition method, the Company first evaluates each of its contractual arrangements to identify its performance obligations. A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the formcustomer. All the Company’s contracts have a single performance obligation because the promise to transfer the individual good or service is not separately identifiable from other promises within the contract and is, therefore, not distinct. These contractual arrangements either require the use of a signed purchase orderhighly specialized manufacturing process to provide goods according to customer specifications or contract, (ii)represent a bundle of contracted goods and services that are integrated and together represent a combined output, which may include the delivery has occurred per contracted terms, (iii) fees and pricesof multiple units.

These performance obligations are fixed and determinable, and (iv) collectabilitysatisfied over time. Sales are recognized over time when control is continuously transferred to the customer during the contract. The continuous transfer of the sale is reasonably assured. All revenue is recognized net of discounts, returns and allowances. Deliverycontrol to the customer is deemedsupported by contract clauses that provide for progress or performance-based payments. Generally, if a customer unilaterally terminates a contract, the Company has the right to receive payment for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit for products and services that do not have occurredalternative use to the Company.

Sales are recorded using the cost-to-cost method on supply and installation contracts that include performance obligations satisfied over time. These sales are generally recorded at amounts equal to the ratio of actual cumulative costs incurred divided by total estimated costs at completion, multiplied by (i) the transaction price, less (ii) the cumulative sales recognized in prior periods.

Accounting for the sales and profits on performance obligations for which progress is measured using the cost-to-cost method involves the preparation of estimates of: (1) transaction price and (2) total costs at completion, which is equal to the sum of the actual incurred costs to date on the contract and the estimated costs to complete the contract’s statement of work. Incurred costs include labor, material, and overhead and represent work performed, which corresponds with and thereby represents the transfer of ownership to the customer. Performance obligations are satisfied over time when the title isrisk of ownership has been passed to the customer. Generally, title passescustomer and/or services are performed. The estimated profit or loss at completion on a contract is equal to the customer upon shipment, but title transfer maydifference between the transaction price and the total estimated cost at completion.

Contract modifications routinely occur to account for changes in contract specifications or requirements. In most cases, contract modifications are for goods or services that are not distinct and, therefore, are accounted for as part of the existing contract. Transaction price estimates include additional consideration for submitted contract modifications or claims when the customer receivesCompany believes it has an enforceable right to the product based onmodification or claim, the termsamount can be reliably estimated and its realization is reasonably assured. Amounts representing modifications accounted for as part of the agreement withexisting contract are included in the customer.transaction price and recognized as an adjustment to sales on a cumulative catch-up basis.

 

Revenues from fixed priceThe Company’s supply and installation contracts which amountallow for progress payments to approximately 16.0%bill the customer as contract costs are incurred and 21.6%the customer often retains a small portion of the Company’s sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to total estimated costs for each contract. Revenues recognized in advance of amounts billable pursuant to contracts terms are recorded as unbilled receivables on uncompleted contracts based on work performed and costs to date. Unbilled receivables on uncompleted contracts are billable upon various events, including the attainment of performance milestones, delivery and installation of products, orcontract price until satisfactory completion of the contract. contractual statement of work, which is a retainage of approximately 10%. The Company records an asset for unbilled receivables due to completing more work than the progress payment schedule allows to collect at a point in time. For certain supply and installation contracts, the Company receives advance payments. Advanced payments are not considered a significant financing component because they are a negotiated contract term to ensure the customer meets its financial obligation, particularly when there are significant upfront working capital requirements. The Company records a liability for advance payments received in excess of sales recognized, which is presented as a contract liability on the balance sheet.

Revisions or adjustments to cost estimates as contracts progress haveof the effect of increasing or decreasing expected profits each period. Changes in contract estimates occur for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope,transaction price, estimated revenuecosts at completion and estimated costs to complete. Provisions for estimated lossesprofit or loss of a performance obligation are often required as work progresses under a contract, as experience is gained, as facts and circumstances change and as new information is obtained, even though the scope of work required under the contract may not change. Revisions or adjustments may also be required if contract modifications occur. The impact of revisions in profit or loss estimates are recognized on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in contract performance and estimated profitability may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognizeda cumulative catch-up basis in the period in which the revisions are determined and do not have a material effect onmade. The revisions in contract estimates, if significant, can materially affect the Company’s financial statements.results of operations and cash flows, as well as reduce the valuations of contract assets and inventories, and in some cases result in liabilities to complete contracts in a loss position. The Company recognizes a liability for non-recurring obligations as situations considering that projects actual costs are usually adjusted to estimated costs. The Company did not recognize sales for performance obligations satisfied in prior periods during year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Shipping and Handling Costs

 

The Company classifies amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling as product revenues. The Company records and presents shipping and handling costs in selling expenses.

 

Sales Tax and Value Added Taxes

 

The Company accounts for sales taxes and value added taxes imposed on its goods and services on a net basis - value added taxes paid for goods and services purchased is netted against value added tax collected from customers and the net amount is paid to the government. The current value added tax rate in Colombia for all of the Company’s products is 19%. A municipal industry and commerce tax (ICA) sales tax of 0.7% is payable on all of the Company’s products sold in the Colombian market.

Product Warranties

 

The Company offers product warranties in connection with the sale and installation of its products that are competitive in the markets in which the products are sold. Standard warranties depend upon the product and service, and are generally from five to ten years for architectural glass, curtain wall, laminated and tempered glass, window and door products. Warranties are not priced or sold separately and do not provide the customer with services or coverages in addition to the assurance that the product complies with original agreed-upon specifications. Claims are settled by replacement of the warrantied products.

The Company evaluated historical information regarding claims for replacements undercost associated with product warranties was $2,453and $957 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and concluded that the costs that the Company has incurred in relation to these warranties have not been material.2018, respectively.

 

Advertising Costs

 

Advertising costs are expensed as they are incurred and are included in general and administrative expenses. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 amounted to approximately $1,293$1,416 and $958,$1,526, respectively.

 

Employee Benefits

 

The Company provides benefits to its employees in accordance with Colombian labor laws. Employee benefits do not give rise to any long term liability.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company’s operations in Colombia are subject to the taxing jurisdiction of the Republic of Colombia. Tecnoglass LLC and Tecnoglass RE LLC are subject to the taxing jurisdiction of the United States. TGI and Tecnoglass Holding areis subject to the taxing jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands. Annual tax periods prior to December 20142016 are no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities in Colombia. GM&P, Componenti and ESW LLC are U.S. entities based in Florida subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes.

 

The Company believes that its income tax positions and deductions would be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in a material changes to its financial position. There are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company records interest and penalties, if any, as a component of income tax expense.

F-12

The Company accounts for income taxes underusing the asset and liability modelapproach of accounting for income taxes (ASC 740 “Income Taxes”). Under this approach, deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and recognizesliabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income taxes represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. For each tax jurisdiction in which the Company operates, deferred tax assets and liabilities forare offset against one another and are presented as a single noncurrent amount within the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and tax credit carry forwards. A valuation allowance is established when management determines that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized.consolidated balance sheets.

 

The Company presents deferred tax assets and liabilities net as either a non-current asset or liability, depending on the net deferred tax position. PresentationThe Company recognizes the financial statement effects of deferred assetsuncertain income tax positions when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. The Company accrues for other tax contingencies when it is probable that a liability to a taxing authority has been incurred and liability on previously issued financial statements separated current deferredthe amount of the contingency can be reasonably estimated. Interest accrued related to unrecognized tax and income tax related penalties are included in the provision for income taxes. The uncertain income taxes from non-current income taxes.

ASC 740 also clarifiespositions are recorded in “Taxes payable” in the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.consolidated balance sheets.

 

Earnings per Share

 

The Company computes basic earnings per share by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Income per share assuming dilution (diluted earnings per share) would give effect to dilutive options, warrants, and other potential ordinary shares outstanding during the period. See Note 1718 - Shareholders’ Equity for further detail on the calculation of earnings per share.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In January 2017, theJune 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326). This ASU No. 2017-01, “Clarifyingrepresents a significant change in the Definitionallowance for credit losses accounting model by requiring immediate recognition of management’s estimates of current expected credit losses. Under the prior model, losses were recognized only as they were incurred, which FASB has noted delayed recognition of expected losses that might not yet have met the threshold of being probable. The new model is applicable to all financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, thereby bringing consistency in accounting treatment across different types of financial instruments and requiring consideration of a Business” (“broader range of variables when forming loss estimates. ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 provides amendments to ASC No. 805, “Business Combinations,” which clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted2016-13 is effective for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this update are effective prospectively during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 provides amendments to ASC No. 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), which eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Entities should perform their goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The amendments in this update are effective prospectively during interim and annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with(with early adoption permitted.application permitted). The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Restricted Cash” (“2019-10 and ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 provides amendments to ASC No. 230, “Statement of Cash Flows,” which require that a statement of cash flows explain the change2019-11 during the period infourth quarter of 2019 that will postpone the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The amendments in this update are effective retrospectively during interim and annual periodsdate to the year beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

On October 24, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-16, Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Asset Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory. The ASU is part of the Board’s simplification initiative aimed at reducing complexity in accounting standards. Under current GAAP, the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers (intercompany sales) are deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use. This is an exception to the principle in ASC 740, Income Taxes, that generally requires comprehensive recognition of current and deferred income taxes. The new guidance eliminates the exception for all intra-entity sales of assets other than inventory. As a result, a reporting entity would recognize the tax expense from the sale of the asset in the seller’s tax jurisdiction when the transfer occurs, even though the pre-tax effects of that transaction are eliminated in consolidation. Any deferred tax asset that arises in the buyer’s jurisdiction would also be recognized at the time of the transfer. The new guidance does not apply to intra-entity transfers of inventory. The income tax consequences from the sale of inventory from one member of a consolidated entity to another will continue to be deferred until the inventory is sold to a third party.2022. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2016,2017, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 230)815): Classification of Certain Cash ReceiptsTargeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.” The amendments under ASU 2017-12 refine and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 reduces diversity in practice by providing guidanceexpand hedge accounting requirements for both financial (e.g., interest rate) and commodity risks. Its provisions create more transparency around how economic results are presented, both on the classificationface of certain cash receiptsthe financial statements and payments in the statementfootnotes. It also makes certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of hedge accounting guidance. ASU 2017-12 became effective for us in the first quarter of 2019. During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, we entered into foreign currency non-delivery forward and collar contracts which we have designated as cash flows.flow hedges and are accounting for as derivative financial instruments to which we are applying the provisions of ASU 2016-15 clarifies that when cash receipts2017-12. Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2019 we did not have any hedging derivatives and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannottherefore prior periods will not be separated, classification will depend on the predominant source or use. ASU 2016-15 is effective on a retrospective basis for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect ofaffected by this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.pronouncement.

 

In May 2016, the FASB also issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-12”), which provides clarification on certain topics within ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), including assessing collectability, presentation of sales taxes, the measurement date for non-cash consideration and completed contracts at transition, as well as providing a practical expedient for contract modifications at transition. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of ASU 2014-09, which is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 3.New Accounting Standards Implemented

 

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). The standard is intended to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the income tax impact, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeitures. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). The FASB issued ASU 2016-02 to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Under ASU 2016-02, a lessee will recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-to-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from current GAAP. ASU 2016-02 retains a distinction between finance leases (i.e. capital leases under currentprevious GAAP) and operating leases. The classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases will be substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases under currentprevious GAAP. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. An entity will be required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date.” ASU 2015-14 defers the effective date of Update 2014-09which for all entities by one year. Early adoption is permitted. Below is the description of ASU 2014-09 which the Company is currently evaluating.the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019.

 

In May 2014,The Company did not adjust the comparative periods presented as the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09). ASU 2014-09 provides guidance for revenue recognition and affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is the recognition of revenue when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under the current guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period withprovided entities the option to elect certaininstead apply the provisions of the new leases guidance using the modified retrospective application approach.The new standard provided a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We elected the ‘package of practical expedients’, which allowed the company to not reassess our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and direct costs.The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualified, primarily for certain equipment leases that are month-to-month leases. This means, for those leases, we did not recognize right-of-use assets or (ii) a retrospective approach withlease liabilities. We also elected the cumulative effectpractical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all classes of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized atunderlying assets.

We have identified and analyzed our lease portfolio and evaluated the datenew reporting and disclosure requirements of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures).the new guidance, and our lease-related processes and internal controls. The Company is currently evaluating the method and impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have onthis standard had no material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and disclosures.

In April 2015,as, under prior guidance, we had recognized capital leases which correspond to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (ASU 2015-03), which resulted in the reclassification of debt issuance costs from “Other Assets” to inclusion as a reduction of our reportable “Long-Term Debt” balance on our consolidated balance sheets. Since ASU 2015-03 does not address deferred issuance costs for line-of-credit arrangements, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Interest – Imputation of Interest: Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements” (ASU 2015-15), in August 2015. ASU 2015-15 allows a company to defer debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements, including arrangements with no outstanding borrowings, classify them as anright-of-use asset and amortize them overlease liability described under the term of the arrangements. We elected to adopt ASU 2015-03 early, with full retrospective application as required by the guidance, and ASU 2015-15, which was effective immediately. These standards didnew guidance. This standard does not have a materialsignificant impact on our consolidated balance sheets and had no impactliquidity or on our cash flows provided by or used in operations for any period presented.debt covenant compliance under our current agreements.

 

InAs of January 1, 2019, the Company had $378 finance lease right-of-use assets related to computing equipment and a lease liability for $380 on its Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 2016,31, 2019, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-20, Technical CorrectionsCompany had $334 finance lease right-of-use assets related to computing equipment and Improvementsa lease liability for $493 on its Consolidated Balance Sheet. The lease agreements include terms to Topic 606, Revenueextend the lease, however the Company does not intend to extend its current leases. The weighted average remaining lease term approximates 2.5 years. The right-of-use assets are depreciated and interest expense from Contracts with Customers, (“ASU 2016-20”). The purposethe lease liability are recorded on our Consolidated Statement of ASU 2016-20Operations.

Additionally, as of December 31, 2019 the Company had a commitment for $52 under operating leases related to short term apartment leases, installation equipment and computing equipment which expire during 2020 that have not been capitalized due to their short-term nature. Rental expense from these leases is to amend certain narrow aspectsrecognized on our Consolidated Income Statement as incurred. Finance lease costs, including amortization of the guidance issued in ASU 2014-09 including guidance related to the disclosure of remaining performance obligations and prior-period performance obligations, as well as other amendments to the guidance on loan guarantee fees, contract costs, refund liabilities, advertising costs and the clarification of certain examples. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern, which defines management's responsibility to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosures if there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We evaluated the impact of ASU No. 2014-15 and its related disclosures, and these standards had no impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” which requires entities to present deferred taxright-of-use assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent for each tax-paying jurisdiction in the Balance Sheet. Previous disclosures required entities to separate deferred tax assetsinterest expense, short term lease cost, and liabilities into a current amount and a noncurrent amount for each tax-paying jurisdiction. ASU 2015-17 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years. ASU 2015-17 can be early adopted for any period that hasrelated cashflows have not been issued on a prospective or retrospective basis. We adopted ASU 2015-17 during the fourth quartermaterial as of 2016 on a retrospective basis and the impact on our consolidated financial statements are reflected in Note 11 – Income Taxes.December 31, 2019.

 

 Note 3.4.ESWindows AcquisitionLong Term Investments

 

Saint-Gobain Joint Venture

On December 2, 2016,January 11, 2019, we entered into a joint venture agreement with Saint-Gobain, a world leader in the production of float glass, a key component of our manufacturing process, whereby we acquired a 25.8% minority ownership interest in Vidrio Andino Holdings S.A.S (“Vidrio Andino”), a Colombia-based subsidiary of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A. (“Saint-Gobain”). The purchase price for our interest in this entity was $45 million, of which $34.1 was paid in cash, and $10.9 million is to be paid with a piece of land near our existing facility in Barranquilla, which will be contributed by a related party owned by members of our Chief Executive Officer´s family with a third party valuation conducted to ensure arm´s length terms. The land will serve the purpose of developing a second float glass plant nearby our existing manufacturing facilities which we expect to carry significant efficiencies for us once it becomes operative. Vidrio Andino’s float glass plant located in the outskirts of Bogota, Colombia, has been one of our main suppliers of raw glass. We believe this transaction will solidify our vertical integration strategy by acquiring an interest in the first stage of our production chain, while securing ample glass supply for our expected production needs.

On May 3, 2019, we consummated the joint venture agreement acquiring a 25.8% minority ownership interest in Vidrio Andino with a cash payment of $34.1 million, and the land still to be contributed during the first quarter of 2020. As of that date the Company recorded the investment within Long-term assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for $45.0 million and a liability for $10.9 million within current liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance to be settled with the contribution of the aforementioned piece of land. Since the date of the acquisition, we have recognized the proportional share of Vidrio Andino’s net income using the equity method on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income as the Company is deemed to have significant influence, but does not have effective control of Vidrio Andino.

GM&P Acquisition

On March 1, 2017, the Company entered into and consummated a purchase agreement, as amended, with Giovanni Monti, the owner of 100% of the stockoutstanding shares of ESW LLC, 85.06%GM&P. GM&P is a consulting and glazing contracting company located in Miami, Florida with over 15 years of which was acquired directly by Tecnoglassexperience in the design and 14.94% by our subsidiary ES, forinstallation of various building enclosure systems such as curtain window walls and a total purchase price of $13.5 million, which consisted of (i) 734,400 ordinary shares issued in connectionlong-standing commercial relationship with the transaction for approximately $9.2 million based on a stock price of $12.50, (ii) approximately $2.3 million in cash, and (iii) approximately $2.0 million related to the assignment of certain accounts receivable from Ventanas Solar S.A. (“VS”).

VS, a Panamasociedad anonima,is an importer and installer of the Company’s products in Panama. Family members of the Company’s CEO and COO and other related parties own 100% of the equity in VS. During 2015 and 2014, the Company, and VS executed a short-term payment agreement and a three-year payment agreement that were mainly created to fund working capital to VS due the timing difference between the collections from VS’s customers. On December 2, 2016 the outstanding amount of $2,016 was reassigned to the former shareholders of ESW LLC as part of the consideration paid for the acquisition of ESW. As a result, the Company does not have any outstanding receivable under these payment agreements as of December 31, 2016. See Note 13 – Related Parties for more information.

The Company incurred expenses for $82 of acquisition related costs which are recorded in operating expensesalongside it in the Company’s results of operations. Ofpast in different projects within the 734,400 shares paid in consideration for the acquisition of ESW LLC, 80,000 shares were placed in Escrow for indemnificationU.S, by providing engineering and installation services to the Company for a period of 18 months after the closing date.

As the Acquisition of ESW LLC was deemed to be a transaction between entities under common control, the assets and liabilities were transferred at the historical cost of ESW LLC, with prior periods retroactively adjusted to include the historical financial results of the acquired company for the period they were controlled by the previous owners of ESW LLC in the Company’s financial statements.those projects.

 

The Company acquired all of the shares of GM&P for a purchase price of $35 million, of which the Company paid $6 million in May 2017 with the remaining $29 million of the purchase price to be paid by May 15, 2018. The Company paid an additional $6 million in cash on April 2018 and entered into a Debt Settlement Agreement to pay the remaining consideration price through a combination of stock, by issuing 1,238,095 ordinary shares valued at $10.50 per share and a $10 million Subordinated Seller´s Note. The Seller´s Note was subsequently reduced to $8.5 million to atone the Buyer for adjustments and process inefficiencies caused by changes in GM&P´s supply chain and other business optimization costs seen during the second quarter of 2018. Following our process optimization and changes in the supply chain process, we believe the associated cost impacts to be non-recurring. The Company originally intended to complete the payment for the acquisition in the short term but opted to classify the liability as long term in line with its contractual maturity as the Company prioritizes its short-term working capital needs to fund ongoing growth. The Seller’s Note bears semi-annual interest payments at approximately 6% per annum and matures in 2022.

Based on the implicit price at which the shares were issued, which at the time of the issuance in June 2018 was higher than the market price of those shares, the Company recorded a gain of $2,106. Additionally, including the reduction of the nominal amount of the Seller´s Note by $1,500, the Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $3,606. The gain on extinguishment of debt was recorded into Additional Paid-In Capital per guidance of ASC 470-50-40 because it is considered a related party transaction as the former owner of GM&P holds a management position within the Company.

With the acquisition of ESW as following:GM&P, the Company also acquired a 60% equity interest in Componenti, a subsidiary of GM&P that provides architectural specialties in the US, specializing in design-build systems for individual projects and with experience in value engineering to create products that comply with the architects’ original design intent, while maintaining focus on affordable construction methods and materials.

 

1.         The Company consolidatedfollowing table summarizes the totalconsideration transferred to acquire GM&P and the amounts of identified assets acquired and liabilities of ESW after taking into account intercompany eliminations and audit adjustments for the year 2015. Since the consolidation was done retrospectively, the Company adjusted the beginning balance of the following accounts to include ESW’s balances as of January 1st, 2015.

  January 1, 2015 
  Prior to acquisition  Effect of Acquisition  After acquisition 
          
Retained Earnings $30,119  $4,338  $34,457 
Total Shareholders’ Equity $46,197  $4,338  $50,535 

2.        Once the opening balance for retained earnings reflectedassumed at the acquisition the Company disclosed on the Shareholders’ Equity Statement and the Cash Flow Statement the distributions made by ESW to its former shareholders, which reduced retained earnings for $1,409 and $2,263 for 2015 and 2016, respectively.

3.        The consideration paid by the Company to acquire ESW included $2.3M in cash which is payable during 2017 and $2M in accounts receivable. The total of $4.3M decreased additional paid-in capital in order to consider the impact of the consideration paid.

4.        The consideration related to the shares issueddate, as form of payment impacted the outstanding number of shares by 734,400. The value of the 734,400 shares is equivalent to the carrying amount of the net assets transferred, even ifwell as the fair value of the equity is reliably determinable. Sincenon-controlling interest in Componenti as of the acquisition is accounted for under common control anddate. Under ASC 805, a company can apply measurement period adjustments during the transfer occurstwelve-month period after the date of acquisition. During this period, the acquirer may adjust preliminary amounts recognized at historical cost the acquisition date to their subsequently determined final fair valuevalues. The allocation of the shares for $9.2M have no impactconsideration transferred was based on management’s judgment after evaluation of several factors, including a preliminary valuation assessment. The analysis was completed on March 2018 and results in measurement period adjustments are included in the final purchase price allocation as shown on the Company’s equity.table below. The goodwill from the GM&P acquisition represents the expected synergies from combining operations with Tecnoglass Inc., and is not deductible for tax purposes

 

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation of the total consideration transferred:

Consideration Transferred:   
Notes payable (Cash or Stock) $35,000 
Fair value of the non-controlling interest in Componenti  1,141 

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets

acquired and liabilities assumed:

 Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation  Measurement Period Adjustments  Final Purchase Price Allocation 
Cash and equivalents $509       509 
Accounts receivable  42,314       42,314 
Other current assets  5,287   242   5,529 
Property, plant, and equipment  684       684 
Other non-current tangible assets  59       59 
Trade name  980       980 
Non-compete agreement  165       165 
Contract backlog  3,090       3,090 
Customer relationships  4,140       4,140 
Accounts payable  (22,330)  275   (22,055)
Other current liabilities assumed  (13,967)  (673)  (14,640 
Non-current liabilities assumed  (3,634)  (3,231)  (6,865)
Total identifiable net assets  17,297   (3,387)  13,910 
Goodwill (including Workforce) $18,844   3,387  $22,231 

The adjustment made to the preliminary purchase price allocation to Non-current liabilities assumed is related to an adjustment in deferred tax liability and billings in excess of cost incurred. The excess of the consideration transferred over the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill. The identifiable intangible asset subject to amortization was the tradename, customer relationships, non-compete agreement, and backlog, which have a remaining useful life of two to five years.

Establishment of a new subsidiary

In April 2019, ESMetals, a Colombian entity in which the Company has 70% equity interest began operations. ESMetals serves as a metalwork contractor to supply the Company with steel accessories used in the assembly of certain architectural systems as part of our vertical integration strategy. When the company owns a majority (but less than 100%) of a subsidiary’s stock, the Company includes in its Consolidated Financial Statements the non-controlling interest in the subsidiary. The non-controlling interest in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income is equal to the non-controlling interests’ proportionate share of the subsidiary’s net income and, as included in Shareholders’ Equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, is equal to the non-controlling interests’ proportionate share of the subsidiary’s net assets. In determining the fair value we used the income approach and the market approach which was performed by third party valuation specialists under management.

Note 5.Segment and Geographic Information

The Company has one operating segment, Architectural Glass and Windows, which is also its reporting segment, comprising the design, manufacturing, distribution, marketing and installation of high-specification architectural glass and windows products sold to the construction industry.

In reviewing the Company’s segmentation, the Company followed guidance under ASC 280-10-50-1 which states that “an operating segment is a component of a public entity that has all of the following characteristics: (i) it engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same public entity), (ii) its operating results are regularly reviewed by the public entity’s chief operating decision maker (CODM) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and (iii) its discrete financial information is available. Based on the Company’s review discussed below, the Company believes that its identification of a single operating and reportable segment - Architectural Glass and Windows - is consistent with the objectives and basic principles of Segment Reporting, which are to “help financial statement readers better understand the public entity’s performance, better assess its prospects for future net cash flows and make more informed judgments about the public entity as originally reported and the net effect of the ESW acquisition after elimination of intercompany transactions. a whole.”

 

  December 31, 2015 
  Prior to acquisition  Net effect of acquisition  After acquisition 
          
Total Assets $316,199  $5,212  $321,411 
Total Sales $238,833  $3,406  $242,239 
             
Net income (loss) $(12,765) $1,745  $(11,020)
Basic income per share $(0.50) $0.09  $(0.42)
Diluted income per share $(0.50) $0.09  $(0.42)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  25,720,469   734,400   26,454,469 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  25,720,469   734,400   26,454,469 

The number of basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding prior tofollowing tables present geographical information about external customers. Geographical information is based on the acquisition of ESW LLC includes 272,905 shares issued afterlocation where there the financial statements forcustomer is located.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Colombia $52,299  $62,445 
United States  368,055   296,534 
Panama  3,482   4,248 
Other  7,076   7,757 
Total Revenues $430,912  $370,984 

The following table presents revenues from external customer by product groups.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Glass and framing components $66,204  $104,032 
Windows and architectural systems  364,708   266,952 
Total Revenues $430,912  $370,984 

During the year ended December 31, 2015 were issued related to a stock dividend in November 2016.2019 and 2018, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues.

 

The following table includes a reconciliationCompany’s long-lived assets are distributed geographically as follows:

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Colombia $153,879  $146,544 
United States  81,286   38,075 
Total long lived assets $235,165  $184,619 

Note 6.Revenue Disaggregation, Contract Assets and Contract liabilities

Disaggregation of Total Net Sales

The Company disaggregates its sales with customers by revenue recognition method for its only segment, as the Company believes these factors affect the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of the financial information forCompany’s revenue and cash flows.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Supply and installation contracts $162,236  $160,503 
Product sales  268,676   210,481 
Total Revenues $430,912  $370,984 

Remaining Performance Obligations

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $323.4 million of remaining performance obligations, which represents the transaction price of firm orders minus sales recognized from inception to date. Remaining performance obligations exclude unexercised contract options, verbal commitments and potential orders under basic ordering agreements. The Company expects to recognize 100% of sales relating to existing performance obligations within two years, of which $245.1 million are expected to be recognized during the year ended December 31, 20162020, and $78.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities

Contract assets represent accumulated incurred costs and earned profits on contracts with customers that have been recorded as being reported,sales, but have not been billed to customers and are classified as current. As a result, the net effecttiming of the ESW acquisition after eliminationsatisfaction of intercompany transactions,performance obligations might differ from the timing of payments, given some conditions must be met before billing can occur. A portion of the amounts billed on certain fixed price contracts that are withheld by the customer as a retainage until a final good receipt of the complete project to the customers satisfaction. Contract liabilities consist of advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred and deferred revenue, and represent amounts received in excess of sales recognized on contracts. The Company classifies advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred as current, and deferred revenue as current or non-current based on the financial information that would have been, hadexpected timing of sales recognition. Contract assets and contract liabilities are determined on a contract by contract basis at the end of each reporting period. The non-current portion of contract liabilities is included in other liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The table below presents the components of net contract assets (liabilities).

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Contract assets — current $42,014  $46,018 
Contract assets — non-current  7,059   6,986 
Contract liabilities — current  (12,459)  (16,789)
Contract liabilities — non-current  (187)  (1,436)
Net contract assets $36,427  $34,779 

The components of contract assets are presented in the table below.

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Unbilled contract receivables, gross $20,729  $21,703 
Retainage  28,344   31,301 
Total contract assets  49,073   53,004 
Less: current portion  42,014   46,018 
Contract assets – non-current $7,059  $6,986 

The components of contract liabilities are presented in the table below.

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Billings in excess of costs $2,077   4,393 
Advances from customers on uncompleted contracts  10,569   13,832 
Total contract liabilities  12,646   18,225 
Less: current portion  12,459   16,789 
Contract liabilities – non-current $187   1,436 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company not acquired ESW LLC:recognized $4,337 of sales related to its billing in excess of cost liability at January 1, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized $6,381 of sales related to its contract liabilities at January 1, 2018.

  December 31, 2016 
  Without acquisition  Net effect of acquisition  Considering acquisition 
          
Total Assets $392,527  $2,203  $394,730 
Total Sales $299,972  $5,044  $305,016 
             
Net income (loss) $23,277  $(97) $23,180 
Basic income per share $0.82  $(0.03) $0.79 
Diluted income per share $0.79  $(0.02) $0.77 
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  28,497,054   734,400   29,231,054 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  29,519,068   734,400   30,253,068 

 Note 4.7.Trade Accounts Receivable

 

Trade accounts receivable consists of the following:

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2016 2015  2019  2018 
Trade accounts receivable $94,380  $67,269   113,243   95,474 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (2,083)  (189)  (2,685)  (2,683)
 $92,297  $67,080 
Total $110,558  $92,791 

 

The changes in allowancesthe allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 are as follows:

 

 December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016  2015  2019  2018 
Balance at beginning of year $189  $110  $2,683  $2,729 
Provision for bad debts  4,686   1,477   1,389   369 
Deductions and write-offs, net of foreign currency adjustment  (2,792)  (1,398)  (1,387)  (415)
Balance at end of year $2,083  $189  $2,685  $2,683 

 

 Note 5.8.Inventories

Inventories are comprised of the following

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Raw materials $44,175  $43,744 
Work in process  24,262   25,957 
Finished goods  5,203   14,251 
Stores and spares  8,130   7,437 
Packing material  981   540 
   82,751   91,929 
Less: Inventory allowance  (37)  (80)
  $82,714  $91,849 

There are no third party liens or pledges on our inventories as of December 31, 2019.

Note 9.Other Current Assets

 

Other assets consists of the followingfollowing:

 

 December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016 2015  2019  2018 
Advances to Suppliers and Loans $716  $822  $1,681  $1,100 
Prepaid Income Taxes  14,080   6,069   23,160   16,000 
Employee Receivables  489   335   465   418 
Prepaid expenses  2,647   1,367 
Derivative financial instruments  749   - 
Other Creditors  804   572   638   1,414 
 $16,089  $7,798 
Total $29,340  $20,299 

 

F-16

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded amortization of prepaid expense for $1,574.

 

 Note 6.10.Other Long Term AssetsProperty, Plant and Equipment

 

  December 31, 
  2014  2015 
Real estate investments $5,125  $4,944 
Cost method investment  500   - 
Other long term assets  1,687   1,476 
  $7,312  $6,420 

Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

 

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Building $59,979  $53,784 
Machinery and equipment  148,968   133,663 
Office equipment and software  6,871   6,238 
Vehicles  1,813   1,887 
Furniture and fixtures  2,264   2,339 
Total property, plant and equipment  219,895   197,911 
Accumulated depreciation  (93,463)  (77,884)
Net book value of property and equipment  126,432   120,027 
Land  28,177   29,172 
Total property, plant and equipment, net $154,609  $149,199 

Depreciation expense was $18,429 and $18,807 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The roll forward of Property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Property, Plant and Equipment        
Beginning balance $227,083  $234,784 
Acquisitions  25,168   13,563 
Reclassification to investment  (1,066)  - 
Tax incentive on installation of solar panels  -   (1,531)
Disposals  (82)  (72)
Assets acquired under credit or debt  1,006   - 
Effect of Foreign currency translation  (4,037)  (19,661)
Ending Balance $248,072  $227,083 
         
Accumulated Depreciation        
Beginning Balance $(77,884) $(66,083)
Depreciation Expense  (18,429)  (18,807)
Disposals  -   39 
Effect of Foreign Currency Translation  2,850   6,967 
Ending balance $(93,463) $(77,884)
Property, plant and Equipment, Net $154,609  $149,199 

The effect of foreign currency translation is the adjustment resulting from translating the amounts from Colombian Pesos, functional currency of some of the Company’s subsidiaries, into U.S. Dollars, the reporting currency.

 Note 7.11.Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill

 

The only goodwilltable below provides a reconciliation of the Company hasbeginning and ending balances of the Goodwill recorded on its balance sheet is in connection with the acquisition of Glasswall LLC from 2014, which amounts to $1,330. The Company has only one reporting unit and as such the impairment analysis was done by comparing the Company’s market capitalization with its book value of equity. For purposes of testingbalance sheet:

Ending balance – December 31, 2017 $23,130 
GM&P measurement period adjustment  431 
Ending balance – December 31, 2018 $23,561 

There were no movements to goodwill for impairment as ofduring the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company compared its market capitalization amounting to $406 million to its book value of equity amounting to $113.6 million. No goodwill impairment was necessary since the Company’s market capitalization exceeded its book value of equity.

During 2016 and 2015 there was no impairments, foreign currency exchange movements, or acquisitions and as such the goodwill balance did not change after the measurement period adjustment related to December 31, 2014.2019.

 

Intangible Assets, Net

 

Intangible assets net include the following Miami-Dade County Notices of Acceptances (NOA’s), which are certificates in theissued for approved products and required to market hurricane-resistanthurricane- resistant glass in Florida:Florida. Also, it includes the intangibles acquired from the acquisition of GM&P.

 

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Gross amount $8,524  $6,446 
Accumulated Amortization  (3,969)  (3,102)
Intangible assets, net $4,555  $3,344 

  December 31, 2019 
  Gross  Acc. Amort.  Net 
Trade Names $980  $(555) $425 
Notice of Acceptances (NOAs), product designs and other intellectual property  8,903   (4,323)  4,580 
Non-compete Agreement  165   (94)  71 
Contract Backlog  3,090   (3,090)  - 
Customer Relationships  4,140   (2,513)  1,627 
Total $17,278  $(10,575) $6,703 

  December 31, 2018 
  Gross  Acc. Amort.  Net 
Trade Names $980  $(359) $621 
Notice of Acceptances (NOAs), product designs and other intellectual property  10,881   (5,373)  5,508 
Non-compete Agreement  165   (60)  105 
Contract Backlog  3,090   (2,832)  258 
Customer Relationships  4,140   (1,626)  2,514 
Total $19,256  $(10,250) $9,006 

 

The weighted average amortization period is 105.4 years.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015,2018, the amortization expense amounted to $825$2,732 and $1,658,$4,350, respectively, and was included within the general and administration expenses in our consolidated statement of operations.

 

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years as of December 31, 20162019 is as follows:

 

Year ending (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
2017 $412 
2018  412 
2019  412 
2020  412  $2,196 
2021  412   2,152 
2022  1,273 
2023  895 
2024  168 
Thereafter  2,495   19 
 $4,555  $6,703 

 

 Note 8.12.InventoriesOther Long Term Assets

 

Inventories are comprised of the following

  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015
Raw materials $40,219  $38,984 
Work in process  5,606   3,451 
Finished goods  4,124   2,875 
Stores and spares  5,016   3,190 
Packing material  284   241 
   55,249   48,741 
Less: inventory allowances  (157)  - 
  $55,092  $48,741 

The changes in inventory allowance for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Balance at beginning of year $-  $292 
Expense (recovery)  238   (255)
Deductions  (84)    
Foreign currency adjustment  3   (37)
Balance at end of year $157  $- 

Note 9.Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
       
Building $50,887  $41,804 
Machinery and equipment  132,333   107,179 
Office equipment and software  4,980   3,528 
Vehicles  1,648   1,402 
Furniture and fixtures  2,141   1,569 
Total property, plant and equipment  191,989   155,482 
Accumulated depreciation  (49,277)  (33,018)
Net book value of property and equipment  142,712   122,464 
Land  28,085   13,510 
Total property, plant and equipment, net $170,797  $135,974 

In July 2016, TG paid $10.5 million to acquire a lot adjacent to the Company’s facilities to expand the manufacturing facilities.

Depreciation expense was $14,508 and $10,806 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Included within the table above are Property, plant and equipment under capital lease, whichOther long term assets are comprised of the following:

 

  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Buildings $3,651  $3,625 
Land  22,536   8,375 
Machinery and Equipment  17,443   26,384 
Total assets under capital lease  43,630   38,384 
Accumulated Depreciation  (7,657)  (3,822)
Total assets under capital lease, net $35,973  $34,562 

For more information on capital lease obligations see Note 10 - Debt. Differences between capital lease obligations and the value of property, plant and equipment under capital lease arise from differences in the maturities of capital lease obligations and the useful lives of the underlying assets. Pursuant to the issuance of the senior unsecured note issued in January 2017, the Company repaid all its capital lease obligations and acquired the underlying assets.

The roll forward of Property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Property, Plant and Equipment        
Beginning balance $168,992  $135,626 
Acquisitions  42,719   80,220 
Purchase price allocation adjustment  -   1,170 
Disposals  (381)  (2,114)
Reclassification to investment property  -   (5,080)
Effect of Foreign currency translation  8,744   (40,830)
Ending Balance $220,074  $168,992 
         
Accumulated Depreciation        
Beginning Balance $(33,018) $(31,646)
Depreciation Expense  (14,508)  (9,906)
Disposals      19 
Reclassification to investment property      161 
Effect of Foreign Currency Translation  (1,751)  8,354 
Ending balance $(49,277) $(33,018)
Property, plant and Equipment, Net $170,797  $135,974 

The effect of foreign currency translation is the adjustment resulting from translating the amounts from Colombian Pesos, functional currency of some of the Company’s subsidiaries, into U.S. Dollars, the reporting currency.

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Real estate investments $2,303  $2,271 
Cost method investment  500   500 
Other long term assets  107   82 
  $2,910  $2,853 
 Note 10.13.Debt

 

The Company’s debt is comprised of the following:

 

 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Revolving lines of credit $13,168  $4,640  $17,455  $19,146 
Loans  162,733   108,342 
Capital Lease  23,696   26,082 
Finance lease  493   380 
Unsecured senior note  210,000   210,000 
Other loans  15,578   17,804 
Syndicated loan  19,999   - 
Less: Deferred cost of financing  (3,714)  (5,015)
Total obligations under borrowing arrangements $199,597  $139,064   259,811   242,315 
Less: Current portion of long-term debt and other current borrowings  2,651   17,571   16,084   21,606 
Long-term debt $196,946  $121,493  $243,727  $220,709 

 

At December 31, 2016, the Company owed approximately $199,597 under its various borrowing arrangements with several banks in Colombia and Panama including obligations under various capital leases as discussed below. This balance includes $2,597 of deferred transaction costs which are reducing the debt balance.

The Company’s loans amounting to $162,733 have maturities ranging from six months to 15 years that bear interest at rates ranging from 2.8 % to 22.6%. These loans are generally secured by substantially all the Company’s real estate. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,December 31, 2018, the Company had $114,198$259,574 and $52,964$242,106 of debt denominated in US Dollars with the remaining amounts denominated in Colombian Pesos.

On January 23, 2017, the Company successfully issued a U.S. dollar denominated, $210 million offering of 5-year senior unsecured notes at a coupon rate of 8.2% in the international debt capital markets under Rule 144A of the Securities Act to Qualified Institutional Buyers. The Company will use approximately $179 million of the proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness and as a result will achieve a lower cost of debt and strengthen its capital structure given the non-amortizing structure of the new bond. Of these repayments, $59,444 were used to refinance short term debt into long term debt. The Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 reflects the effect of this refinance of the Company’s current portion of long term debt and other current borrowings into long term debt based on the Company’s intent as of that date, as per guidance of ASC 470, which states that a short-term obligation shall be excluded from current liabilities if the entity intends to refinance the obligation on a long-term basis and the intent to refinance the short-term obligation on a long-term basis is supported by a post-balance-sheet-date issuance of a long-term obligation.

On January 7, 2016, the Company entered into a $109.5 million, seven-year senior secured credit facility. Proceeds from the new facility were used to refinance $83.5 million of existing debt. Approximately $51.6 million of the new facility were used to refinance short term debt as long term debt. The Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 reflects the effect of this refinance of the Company’s current portion of long term debt and other current borrowings into long term debt based on the Company’s intent as of that date. This credit facility was prepaid pursuant to the senior unsecured note issued in January 2017.

The mortgage loan with TD Bank secured by Tecno RE in December 2014 to finance the acquisition of real property in Miami-Dade County, Florida with an outstanding balance of $3,538 as of December 31, 2016, contained a covenant requiring a 1.0:1 debt service coverage ratio measured on an annual basis. Such covenant was mutually agreed to be terminated during 2016.

 

The Company had $8,366$6,979 and $8,524$5,037 of property, plant and equipment pledged as well as $4,757 and $0 of other long term assets pledged to secure $109,193 and $48,056 undercollateral for various lines of credit facilities as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,December 31, 2018, respectively. DifferencesThese collateralized debt are comprised of a real estate mortgage, several equipment loans, and the syndicate loan facility described below for an aggregate of $31,181 as of December 31, 2019. Significant difference between the value of pledged assets and the amount secured is related to the difference betweenobligations collateralized arises from assets being pledged at market value while carrying value of such assets recordedreflects historical cost.

On May 2, 2019, the Company closed a $30 million five-year term debt facility with Banco de Crédito del Perú and Banco Sabadell which bears interest at historical costLibor +2.95%. Proceeds from this long-term debt facility were used towards refinancing short-term debt and partially supporting expected capital expenditure needs for capacity expansion and the guarantees issuedautomatization of some of our processes.

Some of the outstanding credit facilities include certain covenants that require the Company maintain certain leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios measured to be measured peridically, with which the banksCompany is in compliance.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company was obligated under various finance leases under which are based on the marketaggregate present value of the real estate. Pursuantminimum lease payments amounted to $492. Differences between finance lease obligations and the issuancevalue of the unsecured senior note issued in January of 2017 and repayment of $176,899 million of outstanding indebtedness, $8,366 of pledged property, plant and equipment were released tounder finance lease arises from differences between the Company.

Newmaturities of finance lease obligations entered during 2016 had similar conditions to debt existing atand the beginninguseful lives of the period. Net proceeds from debt for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

  Year ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Proceeds from debt $196,468  $113,455 
Repayments of debt  (163,126)  (102,356)
  $33,342  $11,099 

Additionally, the Company obtained additional financial obligations related to the acquisition of assets under capital lease and financial obligations for $19,641 and $65,319 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.underlying assets.

 

Maturities of long term debt and other current borrowings are as follows as of December 31, 2016:2019:

 

Year Ending December 31,   
2017 $2,651 
2018  2,303 
2019  2,312 
2020  2,323  $16,124 
2021  2,334   6,504 
2022  217,440 
2023  12,125 
2024  7,622 
Thereafter  187,674   3,710 
Total $199,597  $263,525 

Revolving LinesThe Company’s loans have maturities ranging from a few weeks to 10 years. Our credit facilities bear interest at a weighted average of Creditrate 7.33%.

 

The Company has approximately $12,162had $57,337 and $16,940 available and outstanding in several lines of credit under a revolving note arrangement as of December 31, 2016.2019. The floating interest rates on the revolving notes arerange between DTF+4.2%3.9% and DTF+7%7.9% and a weighted average interest rate of 4.7%. DTF is the primary measure of interest ratesThe Company had $18,257 and $19,146 available and outstanding in Colombia. The notes are secured by all assets of the Company. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, $13,168 and $4,640 were outstanding under these lines, respectively. Pursuant to the issuance of the senior unsecured note issued in January 2017, the Company repaid all outstanding balances under theseseveral lines of credit.

Capital Lease Obligations

Ascredit under a revolving note arrangement as of December 31, 2016 the Company was obligated under various capital leases under which the aggregate present value of the minimum lease payments amounted to approximately $23,696. The present value of the minimum lease payments was calculated using discount rates ranging from 10.9% to 12.9%. Differences between capital lease obligations and the value of property, plant and equipment arise from differences in the maturities of capital lease obligations and the useful lives of the underlying assets. Pursuant to the issuance of the senior unsecured note issued in January 2017, the Company repaid all its capital lease obligations.2018.

 

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was $16,814$22,806 and $9,274,$21,187, respectively. The increase is associated to the added debt to address the company´s growth capital expenditure requirements. During the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company did not capitalized interests in the amounts of $377 and $1, 383, respectively.interests.

 

 Note 11.14.Income Taxes

 

The Company files income tax returns for TG, ES and ES Metals in the Republic of Colombia. On December 28, 2016, the Colombian congress enacted a structural tax reform that took effect on January 1, 2017 which reduces corporate income tax from 42% to 40% for fiscal year 2017, 37% in 2018GM&P, Componenti and 33% in 2019 and thereafter. As a result of the Colombian tax reform from December 28, 2016, the Company’s net deferred tax liability decreased $586 as of December 31, 2016.

ESW LLC is an LLC that was notare U.S. entities based in Florida subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes during the year 2015 and the eleven months period ending December 2, 2016, since it was a pass-through entity for tax purposes. ESW LLC was converted to a C-Corporation and will be subject to income taxes starting on December 3, 2016. The estimated income tax rate for C-Corporations ranges between 10% and 39.5%.taxes. Tecnoglass Inc. as well as all the other subsidiaries in the Cayman Islands and Panama dodoes not currently have any tax obligations.

 

The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Current income tax        
United States $(1,438) $(639)
Colombia  (14,188)  (8,626)
   (15,626)  (9,265)
Deferred income Tax        
United States  663   (391)
Colombia  2,035   3,680 
   2,698   3,289 
Total income tax (provision) benefit $(12,928) $(5,976)
         
Effective tax rate  34.8%  41.3%

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Current income tax        
Colombia $16,319  $20,810 
Deferred income Tax        
Colombia  (247)  (119)
Total Provision for Income Tax $16,072  $20,691 

A reconciliation of the statutory tax rate in Colombia to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:

 

 December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016 2015  2019  2018 
Income tax expense at statutory rates  40.0%  39.0%  32.7%  31.3%
Non-deductible expenses  1.2%  224.3%  5.3%  13.0%
Non-taxable income  -0.3%  -2.2%  -3.2%  -3.0%
Effective tax rate  40.9%  261.1%  34.8%  41.3%

 

The Company’s effective tax rate of 261%34.8% for the year ended December 31, 2015 reflects non-deductible losses of $24,901 due to the change in fair value of the Company’s warrant liability during the year ended December 31, 2015 which contributed to 122.5 percentage points in the reconciliation of the Company’s effective income tax rate to the statutory rate and non-deductible losses of $10,858 due to the change in fair value of the Company’s earnout share liability during the year ended December 31, 2015, which contributed to 53.4 percentage points percentage points in the reconciliation of the Company’s effective income tax rate to the2019 aproximates our average statutory rate. Comparably, the Company had nontaxable gains of $776 and $4,674 related to the change in the fair value of warrant liability and earnout share liability during the year ended December 31, 2016.

There were no otherNo single individual items thatitem contributed 5 percentage points or moresignificantely in the reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate andto the statutory rate during the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015.

2019, respectively.

The Company has the following net deferred tax assets and liabilities:

 

 December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016 2015  2019 2018 
Deferred tax assets:                
Accounts Receivable Clients - not delivered FOB $930  $2,402  $(2,105) $(1,119)
Property, plant and equipment adjustments  564   327   319   427 
Financial Liabilities  24   - 
Deferred profit on other assets  107   433 
Provision Inventory obsolescence  36   - 
Tax benefit on installation of renewable energy project  307   448 
Operating loss carryforward  -   1,581 
Foreign currency transactions  8,936   6,560 
Other  240   153 
Total deferred tax assets $1,661  $3,162  $7,697  $8,050 
                
Deferred tax liabilities:                
Inventory - not delivered FOB $1,507  $1,646 
Depreciation and Amortization  (2,489)  (2,445)
Unbilled receivables uncompleted contracts  2,649   3,947   -   (3,293)
Depreciation  1,028   311 
Financials Liabilities  -   2 
Other  (382)  (248)
Foreign currency transactions  (642)  - 
Total deferred tax liabilities $5,184  $5,906  $(3,513) $(5,986)
                
Net deferred tax $3,523  $2,744  $4,184  $2,064 

 

Net deferred tax is presented on the balance sheet as follows:

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2016 2015  2019 2018 
Long term deferred income tax asset $-  $640 $4,595  $4,770 
Less: long term deferred income taxliability  3,523  3,384  $411  $2,706 
Note 15.Hedging Activities and Fair Value Measurements

 

Hedging Activity

Presentation

During the quarter ended September 30, 2019 we entered into several foreign currency non-delivery forward and collar contracts to hedge the fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Colombian Peso and the U.S. Dollar. Our contracts are designated as cash flow hedges since they are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows attributable to forecasted Colombian Peso denominated costs and expenses.

Guidance under the Financial Instruments Topic 825 of deferred assetsthe Codification requires us to record our hedge contracts at fair value and consider our credit risk for contracts in a liability position, and our counter-party’s credit risk for contracts in an asset position, in determining fair value. We assess our counter-party’s risk of non-performance when measuring the fair value of financial instruments in an asset position by evaluating their financial position, including cash on previously issued financial statements presentedhand, as well as their credit ratings.

As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of foreign currency non-delivery forward and collar contracts was in a separate line item currentnet asset position of $749. We had 14 outstanding forward and non-current portionscollar contracts to exchange 30 million U.S. Dollars to Colombian Pesos through August 2020. We assessed the risk of deferred tax assets and liabilities. In observancenon-performance of ASU 2015-17, the Company now presents total net deferred tax asset or liability as a non-current asset or liability. The netting of long term net deferred tax assetto these contracts and short term deferred tax liability as the Company adopted this new accounting pronouncement retroactively resulted in a reclassification of current deferred tax liabilitydetermined it was insignificant and, therefore, did not record any adjustment to non-current liabilityfair value as of December 31, 2015. Refer2019.

We assess the effectiveness of our foreign currency non-delivery forward and collar contracts by comparing the change in the fair value of the forward contract to Note 2 – Basisthe change in the expected cash to be paid for the hedged item. The effective portion of Presentationthe gain or loss on our foreign currency non-delivery forward and Summarycollar contracts is reported as a component of Significant Accounting Policies for more information on this recently issued accounting pronouncement.accumulated other comprehensive loss and is reclassified into earnings in the same line item in the income statement as the hedged item in the same period or periods during which the transaction affects earnings. The amount of losses, net, recognized in the “accumulated other comprehensive income” line item in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019, that we expect will be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months, is $749.

 

The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions for which it is reasonably possible thatfair value of our foreign currency hedges are classified in the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease within twelve monthsaccompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016. 2019, are as follows:

  Derivative Assets  Derivative Liabilities
  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2019
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Subtopic 815-20: Balance Sheet Location Fair
Value
   Balance Sheet Location Fair Value 
            
Derivative instruments:             
Non-Delivery forward and collar contracts Other current assets $749   Accrued liabilities $- 
Total derivative instruments Total derivative assets $749   Total derivative liabilities $- 

The unrecognizedending accumulated balance for the foreign currency non-delivery forward and collar contracts included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, benefits may increase or change duringwas $509 as of December 31, 2019, comprised of a derivative loss of $749 and an associated net tax benefit of $240.

The following table presents the nextgains (losses) on derivative financial instruments, and their classifications within the accompanying consolidated financial statements, for the year for items that arise in the ordinary course of business and may be subject to inspection by the Colombian tax authorities for a period of up to two years until the statute of limitations period elapses.ended December, 2019:

Note 12.Fair Value Measurements

  Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships 
  Amount of Gain or (Loss)  

Location of Gain or (Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated

 

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Reclassified from

 
  Recognized in OCI (Loss) on  OCI (Loss) into Accumulated 
  Derivatives  Income OCI (Loss) into Income 
  Year Ended    Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31,    December 31,  December 31, 
  2019  2018    2019  2018 
                   
Non-delivery Forwards and Collar Contracts $749  $-  General and administrative expense $(214) $- 

Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company accounts for financial assets and liabilities in accordance with accounting standards that define fair value and establish a framework for measuring fair value. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset’s or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and advances from customers approximate their fair value due to their relatively short-term maturities. The Company bases its fair value estimate for long term debt obligations on its internal valuation that all debt is floating rate debt based on current interest rates in Colombia.valuation.

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

QuotesSignificant
PricesOtherSignificant
in ActiveObservableUnobservable
MarketsInputsInputs
At December 31, 2016(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)
Marketable equity securities505--
Interest Rate Swap Derivative Liability-23-

QuotesSignificant
PricesOtherSignificant
in ActiveObservableUnobservable
MarketsInputsInputs
At December 31, 2015(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)
Marketable equity securities428--
Earnout Shares Liability--34,154
Warrant Liability--31,213
Interest Rate Swap Derivative Liability-42-

 

As of December 31, 2016,2019, financial instruments carried at amortized cost that do not approximate fair value consist of long-term debt. See Note 1011 - Debt. The fair value of long termlong-term debt was calculated based on an analysis of future cash flows discounted with our average cost of debt which is based on market rates, which are level 2 inputs.

 

The following table summarizes the fair value and carrying amounts of our long-term debt:

 

  December 31 
  2016  2015 
Fair Value  190,190   138,347 
Carrying Value  196,786   121,493 

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Fair Value  259,814   234,163 
Carrying Value  243,727   220,709 
 Note 13.16.Related Parties

 

The following is a summary of assets, liabilities, and income and expense transactions with all related parties, shareholders, directors and managers:

 

  At December 31,  At December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Assets        
Current Assets        
Due from VS $9,143  $6,895 
Due from other related parties  1,852   3,291 
  $10,995  $10,186 
         
Long Term Trade receivable from VS $-  $2,536 
Investments  -   64 
         
Liabilities        
Due to related parties $(3,668) $(1,362)
  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015
       
Revenues $9,742  $9,942 
Interest Income  235   451 
         
Expenses-        
Fees paid to Directors and Officers  2,579   1,871 
Paid to other related parties  2,395   3,036 
  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Current Assets:        
Due from VS $4,203  $6,229 
Due from other related parties  3,854   2,010 
  $8,057  $8,239 
         
Long Term due from VS  1,786   - 
         
Liabilities:        
Due to related parties - current $4,415  $1,500 
Due to related parties - Non current $622  $600 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Sales to related parties $8,794  $5,538 
         
Fees paid to directors and officers $3,537  $3,307 
Payments to other related parties $3,388  $3,618 

 

Ventanas Solar S.A. (“VS”), a Panamasociedad anonima,is an importer and installer of the Company’s products in Panama. Family members of the Company’s CEO and COO and other related parties own 100% of the equity in VS. The Company’s sales to VS for the year ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were, $8,269$3,273, and $5,437,$2,938, respectively.

 

During 2015 and 2014, the Company and VS executed a short-term payment agreement and a three-year payment agreement that were mainly created to fund working capital to VS due the timing difference between the collections from VS’s customers. The interest rate of these payment agreements is Libor + 4.7% paid semiannually and Libor +6.5% paid monthly for the short-term agreement and the three-year agreement, respectively. On December 2, 2016 the outstanding amount of $2,016 was reassigned to the former shareholders of ESW LLC as part of the consideration paid for the acquisition of ESW. As a result, the Company does not have any outstanding receivable under these payment agreements as of December 31, 2016.

Due from other related parties as of December 31, 2016 includes $411 due from Daesmo, and $537 from Consorcio Ventanar ESW - Boca Grande. Due from other related parties as of December 31, 2015 includes $657 due from Daesmo, $524 from Consorcio Ventanar ESW - Boca Grande. Also included within due from other related parties as of December 31, 2015 is a loan to Finsocial, a company that makes loans to public school system teachers with balance of $256.

Due to related party includes a $2,303 payable to the former shareholders of ESW LLC as part of the consideration paid for the acquisition (See Note 3 – ESWindows for further details). During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, ESW LLC made distributions to its former shareholders amounting to $2,263 and 1,409, respectively, which are distributions made prior to acquisition date, as further described in Note 3 – ESWindows Acquisition.

PaidPayments to other related parties during the year ended December 31, 2016 include charitable contributions toperiods indicated are comprised of the Company’s foundation for $1,340, sales commissions for $392 and other services for $663.following:

 

Included within the amount due to related parties is a note payable to shareholder for $79 as of December 31, 2016. From September 5, 2013 to November 7, 2013 A. Lorne Weil loaned the Company $150 of which $70 was paid at closing of the Merger and $80 remained unpaid as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. During the second quarter of 2014, the Company paid $1 and a balance of $79 remains unpaid as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Charitable contributions $1,343  $1,263 
Sales commissions $1,105  $1,419 

 

Analysis of variable interest entities

The Company conducted an evaluation of its involvement with all its significant related party business entities as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 in order to determine whether these entities were variable interest entities (“VIE”) requiring consolidation or disclosures in the financial statements of the Company. The Company evaluated the purpose for which these entities were created and the nature of the risks in the entities as required by the guidance under ASC 810-10-25 - Consolidation and related Subsections.

From all the entities analyzed, only two entities, ESW LLC and VS, resulted in having variable interests. However, as of the date of the initial evaluation and for the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company concluded that both entities are not deemed VIEs and as such these entities should not be consolidated within the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, on December 2016, we acquired 100% of the equity of ESW LLC, and the acquisition was deemed to be transactions between entities under common control. As such, the assets and liabilities were transferred at the historical cost of ESW LLC, with prior periods retroactively adjusted to include the historical financial results of the acquired company for the period they were controlled by ESW LLC in the Company’s financial statements (See Note 3 – ESWindows Acquisition for additional information).

Note 14.Derivative Financial Instruments

In 2012, the Company entered into three interest rate swaps (IRS) contracts as economic hedges against interest rate risk through 2017, and two currency forward contracts as economic hedges against foreign currency rate risk on U.S. dollar loans. The currency forwards expired in January 2014. Hedge accounting treatment per guidance in ASC 815-10 and related Subsections was not pursued at inception of the contracts. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in current earnings. The derivatives were recorded as a liability on the Company’s balance sheet at an aggregate fair value of $23 and $42 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Pursuant to the senior unsecured note issued in January of 2017, the Company repaid the underlying obligations and terminated the interest rate swaps (See Note 21. Subsequent events for further information).

Note 15.Warrant Liability and Earnout Shares Liability

Warrant Liability

The fair value of the warrant liability was determined by the Company using the Binomial Lattice pricing model. This model is dependent upon several variables such as the instrument’s expected term, expected strike price, expected risk-free interest rate over the expected instrument term, the expected dividend yield rate over the expected instrument term and the expected volatility of the Company’s stock price over the expected term. The expected term represents the period that the instruments granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected strike price is based upon a weighted average probability analysis of the strike price changes expected during the term because of the down round protection. The risk-free rates are based on U.S. Treasury securities with similar maturities as the expected terms of the options at the date of valuation. Expected dividend yield is based on historical trends. The Company measures volatility using a blended weighted average of the volatility rates for several similar publicly-traded companies. The inputs to the model were as follows:

  December 31,2015 
Stock Price $13.74 
Dividend Yield  * 
Risk-free rate  0.65%
Expected Term  0.97 
Expected Volatility (level 3 input)  37.69%

*A quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share commencing in the second quarter of 2016 was assumed.

When the warrants are exercised for ordinary shares, the Company re-measures the fair value of the exercised warrants as of the date of exercise using quoted prices on the OTC Pink Markets and records the change in fair value in the consolidated statement of operations, and records the fair value of the exercised warrants as additional paid-in capital in the shareholders’ equity section of the Company’s balance sheet.

On August 4, 2016, the Company commenced a warrant exchange offer, under which each Tecnoglass warrant holder had the opportunity to receive one Tecnoglass ordinary share in exchange for every 2.5 of the Company’s outstanding warrants tendered by the holder and exchanged pursuant to the offer. As of the expiration of the exchange offer period on September 8, 2016, 5,479,049 outstanding warrants, or approximately 82% of the outstanding warrants, were tendered. Those tenders were accepted by Tecnoglass, which issued 2,191,608 new ordinary shares on September 14, 2016. As a result, the warrant liability decreased by $26,300 and the additional paid in capital increased by the same amount.

On December 20, 2016, the ordinary warrants expired by their terms. There were 1,275,823 warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2016 following completion of the Company’s September 2016 warrant exchange offer. Of such amount, 1,265,842 warrants were exercised prior to the expiration of the warrants, resulting in 478,218 ordinary shares being issued, with the remaining unexercised warrants expiring by their terms. The warrant liability associated with the warrants was reclassified into equity once adjusted to fair value at the date of expiration.

In the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a gain of $4,675 in the consolidated statement of operations for the change in fair value of exercised warrants and recorded $26,502 as additional paid-in capital in the shareholders’ equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as below:

  Number of Warrants  Average Value  Fair Value 
Opening balance as of January 1, 2015  9,097,430  $2.19  $19,991 
             
Change in fair value to the date of cashless exercise charged to income statement  2,325,924  $3.69  $8,591 
Fair value of warrants exercised credited to shareholders equity  2,325,924  $5.88  $(13,679)
Change in fair value of unexercised warrants remaining at December 31, 2015  6,771,506  $2.41  $16,310 
             
Closing balance as of December 31, 2015  6,771,506  $4.61  $31,213 
             
Change in fair value to the date of cashless exercise charged to income statement  6,761,525  $0,11  $(738)
Fair value of warrants exercised credited to shareholders equity  6,761,525  $4,50  $(30,437)
Change in fair value of unexercised warrants expired on December 20, 2016.  9,981  $3,76  $(38)
             
Closing balance as of December 31, 2016  -  $-  $- 
             
Net gain on exercise of warrants  6,761,525  $4,38  $(31,375)
Total change in warrant liability due exercise of warrants and change in fair value of remaining warrants         $(31,213)

Earnout Shares Liability

The fair value of the earnout shares liability is calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation, whereby future net revenue was simulated over the earnout period using a geometric Brownian Motion. Our model utilized management’s forecasted net sales and was performed in a risk-neutral environment. The inputs to the model were as follows:

  December 31,2015 
Stock Price $13.74 
Risk-free rate  0.41%
Expected Term  1 year 
Asset Volatility (level 3 input)  38%
Equity Volatility (level 3 input)  45%

*A quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share commencing in the second quarter of 2016 was assumed.

The value of the earnout share liability is sensitive to changes in equity volatility and the forecasted EBITDA of the company. An increase or decrease in the equity volatility of 5% would result in an increase or decrease in the value of the earnout share liability of approximately 0.3%, respectively. An increase or decrease in the EBITDA of 5% would result in an increase or decrease in the value of the earnout share liability of approximately 0.3%, respectively.

The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the earnout shares liability measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

Balance - December 31, 2014 $29,061 
Fair value adjustment for year ended December 31, 2014  10,858 
Fair value of earnout shares issued credited to shareholders’ equity  (5,765)
Balance at December 31, 2015 $34,154 
Fair value adjustment for year ended December 31, 2016  (4,674)
Fair value of earnout shares issued credited to shareholders’ equity  (29,480)
Balance at December 31, 2016 $- 

Pursuant to the business combination closed on December 20, 2012, the Company issued 500,000 ordinary shares upon achievement of the EBITDA target for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 1,000,000 ordinary shares upon achievement of the EBITDA target for the year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, on December 20, 2016, we notified the Escrow Agent that the earnout target for the year ended December 31, 2016 had been met in full, notwithstanding the fact that the audit of such period had not yet been completed. Through November 30, 2016, Tecnoglass had achieved an EBITDA substantially higher than the one between $40 million and $45 million required to trigger the release of the shares from escrow. As a result, Tecnoglass instructed the Escrow Agent to release the remaining 1,500,000 ordinary shares held in escrow to Energy Holding Corp., the former stockholder of Tecnoglass prior to the Business Combination and an affiliate of Jose M. Daes, our Chief Executive Officer, and Christian T. Daes, our Chief Operating Officer.

 Note 16.17.Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

As of December 31, 2019, the Company has an outstanding obligation to purchase an aggregate of at least $19,642 of certain raw materials from a specific supplier before May 2026.

Additionally, in connection with the joint venture agreement the Company entered into with Saint-Gobain on January 11, 2019, further described in Note 4. Lont Term Investments, the Company acquired a contingent obligation to purchase minimum volumes of float glass once the new plant located close to the Company’s actual manufacturing facilities commences operations, which are expected to initiate in 2022.

 

Guarantees

 

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company does not have guarantees on behalf of other parties.

Legal Matters

 

On March 2, 2016 ES filed a lawsuit against Bagatelos Architectural Glass Systems, Inc. (“Bagatelos”) in Colombia. In addition, we also filed a lawsuit against Bagatelos in the State of California for breach of contract. To lift the lien declared by the Court in California, Bagatelos submitted a bond for $2.0 million in favor of ES and its release is subject to the court’s ruling. This bond is a “mechanics lien surety bond” which guarantees ES payment of the amounts due with interest and costs should the Company win the case. Mediation scheduled for February 17, 2017 was unsuccessful and parties continue discovery. Bagatelos as defendant presented a cross complaint on September 23, 2016 seeking damages of approximately $3 million. Although we already received a payment order from the Colombian judge, the Company continues to pursue its rights, remedies and defenses in the U.S. We received on January 31, 2017 a case update from our U.S. counsel stating that due to ES’ favorable terms and conditions and the fact that Bagatelos has overstated their claim and ignored their contractual duties, it is probable that the Company will be able to recover the outstanding amount of $2.0 million.

General Legal Matters

 

From time to time, the Company is involved in legal matters arising in the ordinaryregular course of business. While management believesSome disputes are derived directly from our construction projects, related to supply and installation, and even though deemed ordinary, they may involve significant monetary damages. We are also subject to other type of litigations arising from employment practices, worker’s compensation, automobile claims and general liability. It is very difficult to predict precisely what the outcome of these litigations might be. However, with the information at out disposition as this time, there are no indications that such matters are currently not material, there can be no assurance that matters arisingclaims will result in the ordinary course of business for which the Company is, or could be, involved in litigation, will not have a material adverse effect on itsthe business, financial condition or results of operations.operations of the Company.

 

 Note 17.18.Shareholders’ Equity

 

Preferred Shares

 

TGITecnoglass is authorized to issue 1,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.0001 per share with such designation, rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors.

 

As of December 31, 2016,2019, there are no preferred shares issued or outstanding.

 

Ordinary Shares

 

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 ordinary shares with a par value of $0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2016,2019, a total of 33,172,14446,117,631 Ordinary shares were issued and outstanding.

 

Legal Reserve

 

Colombian regulation requires that companies retain 10% of net income until it accumulates at least 50% of subscribed and paid in capital. The amount recorded meets this standard.

 

Earnings per Share

 

The following table sets forth the computation of the basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015:

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per shares        
Net Income (Loss) $23,180  $(11,020)
         
Denominator        
Denominator for basic earnings per ordinary share - weighted average shares outstanding  29,231,054   26,454,469 
Effect of dilutive securities and stock dividend  1,022,014   - 
Denominator for diluted earnings per ordinary share - weighted average shares outstanding  30,253,068   26,454,469 
         
Basic earnings per ordinary share $0.79  $(0.42)
Diluted earnings per ordinary share $0.77  $(0.42)

The weighted average number for shares outstanding for calculation of basic earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 considers 734,400 ordinary shares issued as part of the consideration paid the acquisition of ESW LLC, acquisition of an entity under common control as further described in Note 3, and as perASC 260 – Earnings Per Share, 272,505 ordinary shares issued about the share dividend paid in November of 2016.2018:

 

The effect of dilutive securities includes 8,559 potential shares from outstanding Unit Purchase Options, and 1,013,455 from the potential dividend for the third and fourth stock dividend election. The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2015 excludes the effect of 3,502,079 dilutive securities because their inclusion would be antidilutive due to the net loss for the period.

  Year ended December 31,
  2019  2018 
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per shares        
Net Income (loss) $24,269  $8,486 
         
Denominator        
Denominator for basic earnings per ordinary share - weighted average shares outstanding  44,464,097   39,087,527 
Effect of dilutive securities and stock dividend  -   - 
Denominator for diluted earnings per ordinary share - weighted average shares outstanding  44,464,097   39,487,940 
Basic earnings (loss) per ordinary share $0.55  $0.22 
Diluted earnings (loss) per ordinary share $0.55  $0.21 

 

Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan

 

On December 20, 2013, our shareholders approved our 2013 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“2013 Plan”). Under the 2013 Plan, 1,593,917 ordinary shares are reserved for issuance in accordance with the plan’s terms to eligible employees, officers, directors and consultants. As of December 31, 2016,2019, no awards had been made under the 2013 Plan.

 

Dividend

The Company hasPrior to April 2015, we had not paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares. On April 14, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized the payment of four regular quarterly dividends to holders of our ordinary shares at a quarterly rate of $0.125 per share or(or $0.50 per share on an annual basis, withbasis). Our Board of Directors subsequently authorized an increase in the first quarterly dividend being payabledividends to $0.14 per share (or $0.56 per share on November 1, 2016.an annual basis) beginning on the third quarter of 2017 going forward. The dividends are payable in cash or ordinary shares, at the option of the holders of ordinary shares. In connection with the first quarterly dividend payable on November 1, 2016, Energy Holding Corp., the majority shareholder of the Company, elected to receive such dividend in ordinary shares, as opposed to cash. Moreover, retroactively effective as of September 23, 2016 (the first date of the election period for the first quarterly dividend), Energy Holding Corp. irrevocably elected to receive the next three quarterly dividends in ordinary shares, as opposed to cash. On November 1, 2016 the Company paid $789 and issue 272,505 shares for the first quarterly dividend to shareholders of record as of the close of business on September 23, 2016.

On December 7, 2016, the Company announced the timing for the payment of its declared regular quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share for the fourth quarter 2016. The dividend was paid on February 1, 2017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 29, 2016. The dividend was paid in cash or ordinary shares, to be chosen at the option of holders of ordinary shares during an election period beginning December 29, 2016 and lasting until January 20, 2017.period. The value of the ordinary shares to be used to calculate the number of shares to be issued with respect to that portion of the dividend payable in ordinary shares was calculated using the average of the closing price of the Company’sour ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Capital Market during a set period. If no choice was made during the three day period from January 18, 2017 through January 20, 2017 whichelection periods, the dividend was $11.74. On February 1, 2016, the Company issued 306,579paid in ordinary shares and paid $564 in connection with the second quarterly dividend.

Note 18.Segment and Geographic Information

The Company has one operating segment, Architectural Glass and Windows, which is also its reporting segment, comprising the design, manufacturing, distribution, marketing and installation of high-specification architectural glass and windows products sold to the construction industry.

In reviewing the Company’s segmentation, the Company followed guidance under ASC 280-10-50-1 which states that “an operating segment is a component of a public entity that has all of the following characteristics: (i) it engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same public entity), (ii) its operating results are regularly reviewed by the public entity’s chief operating decision maker (CODM) to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and (iii) its discrete financial information is available. Based on the Company’s review discussed below, the Company believes that its identification of a single operating and reportable segment - Architectural Glass and Windows - is consistent with the objectives and basic principles of Segment Reporting, which are to “help financial statement readers better understand the public entity’s performance, better assess its prospects for future net cash flows and make more informed judgments about the public entity as a whole.”shares.

 

The payment of any dividends is ultimately within the discretion of our Board of Directors. The payment of dividends in the future, if any, will be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and our general financial condition and limitations imposed by our outstanding indebtedness.

Dividend declarations and the establishment of future record and payment dates are subject to the Board of Directors’ continuing determination that the dividend policy is in the best interests of the Company analyzedand its shareholders. The dividend policy may be changed or cancelled at the Company’s segmentation afterdiscretion of the Board of Directors at any time.

Non-controlling interest

With the acquisition of ESWGM&P, the Company also acquired a 60% equity interest in Componenti USA LLC, a subsidiary of GM&P that provides architectural specialties in the US, specializing in design-build systems for individual projects and concludedwith experience in value engineering to create products that comply with the operationsarchitects’ original design intent, while maintaining focus on affordable construction methods and materials. The 40% non-controlling interest in Componenti is included in the opening balance sheet as of ESW LLC fall within our single operating segment, Architectural Glassthe acquisition date and Windows.

its fair value amounted to $1,141. When the company owns a majority (but less than 100%) of a subsidiary’s stock, the Company includes in its Consolidated Financial Statements the non-controlling interest in the subsidiary. The following tables present geographical information about external customersnon-controlling interest in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and revenues from external customer by product groups. Geographical informationOther Comprehensive Income is basedequal to the non-controlling interests’ proportionate share of the subsidiary’s net income and, as included in Shareholders’ Equity on the location where thereConsolidated Balance Sheet, is equal to the sale was originated.

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Colombia $98,758  $81,290 
United States  189,985   145,207 
Panama  9,444   7,329 
Other  6,829   8,413 
Total Revenues $305,016  $242,239 

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Glass and framing components $89,850  $85,034 
Windows and architectural systems  215,166   157,205 
Total Revenues $305,016  $242,239 

Excluding related parties, only one customer, Giovanni Monti and Partners Consulting and Glazing Contractors (“GM&P”), accounted for more than 10% or more of our net sales, amounting to $80.0 million, or 26% of total sales, and $32.0 million, or 13% of sales during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. In March of 2017 the Company has acquired 100%non-controlling interests’ proportionate share of the equity of GM&P. Refer to Note 21 – Subsequent Events for more information.subsidiary’s net assets. In determining the fair value we used the income approach amd the market approach which was performed by third party valuation specialists under management.

The Company’s long lived assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are distributed geographically as follows:

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Colombia $172,478  $137,080 
United States  5,631   5,314 
Total long lived assets $178,109  $142,394 

 Note 19.Operating Expenses

 

Selling expenses for the years ended December 31, 20162019, and 20152018 were comprised of the following:

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2016 2015  2019  2018 
Shipping and Handling $15,568  $11,955  $14,327  $18,583 
Personnel  5,679   5,128   7,070   6,707 
Sales commissions  4,346   4,298   7,775   5,382 
Services  1,723   1,571   2,487   2,502 
Packaging  950   1,093   1,039   1,283 
Accounts Receivable provision  1,389   369 
Other Selling Expenses  4,001   3,558   7,838   4,564 
Total Selling Expense $32,267  $27,603  $41,925  $39,390 

General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were comprised of the following:

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2016 2015  2019  2018 
Personnel $7,938  $6,015  $9,925  $9,377 
Professional Fees  5,395   4,596 
Professional fees  3,227   3,963 
Taxes  1,302   1,628   1,288   845 
Services  2,302   1,685   4,509   2,918 
Depreciation and Amortization  1,788   2,684   4,182   4,887 
Bank Charges and tax on financial transactions  2,881   1,499 
Charitable contributions  1,504   1,425 
Bank charges and tax on financial transactions  1,176   947 
Insurance  1,776   1,601 
Rent expense  803   854 
Related parties  3,913   3,770 
Other expenses  4,736   2,654   4,270   4,470 
Total General and administrative expenses $27,846  $22,186  $35,069  $33,632 

 

 Note 20.

Non-Operating Income and Expenses

 

Non-operating income (net)and expenses, net on our consolidated statement of operations amounted to $4,155$1,565 and $5,054$2,915 for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. These amounts are primarily comprised of income from interests on receivables and short-term investments, rent income and recoveries on scrap materials.

 

 Note 21.Subsequent Events

 

We intend to directly or indirectly acquire 100% of the stock of VSManagement concluded that no additional subsequent events required disclosure other than those disclosed in the near future, likely during the first half of 2017. Following the procedures established in our Code of Ethics, we also expect the terms of such transaction, when available, to be subject to review and approval by our Audit Committee and our Board of Directors based on analysis conducted by external advisor.these financial statements.

On January 23, 2017, the Company successfully issued a U.S. dollar denominated, $210 million offering of 5-year senior unsecured notes at a coupon rate of 8.2% in the international debt capital markets under Rule 144A of the Securities Act to qualified institutional investors. The Company will use approximately $179 million of the proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness and as a result will achieve a lower cost of debt and strengthen its capital structure given the non-amortizing structure of the new bond. The Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 reflects the effect of this refinance of the Company’s current portion of long term debt and other current borrowings into long term debt based on the Company’s intent as of that date.

On December 7, 2016, the Company announced the timing for the payment of its declared regular quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share for the fourth quarter 2016. The dividend was paid on February 1, 2017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 29, 2016. The dividend will be paid in cash or ordinary shares, to be chosen at the option of holders of ordinary shares during an election period beginning December 29, 2016 and lasting until January 20, 2017. The value of the ordinary shares to be used to calculate the number of shares to be issued with respect to that portion of the dividend payable in ordinary shares shall be the average of the closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares on NASDAQ during the three day period from January 18, 2017 through January 20, 2017 which was $11.74 If no choice was made during this election period, the dividend for this election period was paid in ordinary shares of the Company. On February 1, 2017, the Company issued 306,579 ordinary shares and paid $564 in connection with the second quarterly dividend.

On March 1, 2017 the Company entered into and consummated a purchase agreement with Giovanni Monti, the owner of 100% of the outstanding shares of GM&P. GM&P is a consulting and glazing contracting company located in Miami, Florida. GM&P has over 15 years of experience in the design and installation of various building enclosure systems such as curtain window walls. GM&P has had a long-standing commercial relationship with the Company, working alongside it in different projects within the U.S, by providing engineering and installation services to those projects. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company acquired all of the shares of GM&P from the Seller for a purchase price of $35 million. The Company will pay $6 million of the purchase price in cash within the 60 days following the Effective Date, with the remaining $29 million of the purchase price to be payable on or before September 1, 2017 (six months from the Effective Date).