0000067625 MNR:MortgageNotesPayableMember MNR:PlainCityColumbusOHMember 2020-10-01 2021-09-30

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year endedSeptember 30 2018, 2021

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period ___________________ to ____________________

Commission File Number:001-33177

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

(Exact name ofregistrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland22-1897375
(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)Identification No.)

3499 Route 9 North, 101 Crawfords Corner Road, Suite 3-D, Freehold, 1405, Holmdel, NJ   0772807733

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)            (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:732-577-9996732-577-9996

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock

MNR

New York Stock Exchange

6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockMNR-PC

New York Stock Exchange

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, $25 liquidation value per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[X] Yes [  ] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

[  ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes [  ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). [X] Yes [  ] No

Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [X]Accelerated filer [  ]
Non-accelerated filer [  ]Smaller reporting company [  ]
Emerging growth company [  ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [  ] Yes [X] No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant at March 31, 20182021 was approximately $1,138,940,000$1.7 billion (based on the $15.04$17.69 closing price per share of the registrant’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on March 29, 2018)31, 2021).

There were 91,587,71398,339,416 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 15, 2018.1, 2021.

 

 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item

No.

   

Page

No.

  Part I  
1 Business. 3
1A Risk Factors. 10
1B Unresolved Staff Comments. 19
2 Properties. 20
3 Legal Proceedings. 27
4 Mine Safety Disclosures. 27
     
  Part II  
5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. 

 

28

6 [Reserved] 29
7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 30
7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 53
8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. 54
9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. 55
9A Controls and Procedures. 55
9B Other Information. 56
9C Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections. 56
     
  Part III  
10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. 57
11 Executive Compensation. 57
12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. 57
13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. 57
14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services. 57
     
  Part IV  
15 Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules. 58
     
  Signatures 120

Item No. Page No.
 Part I 
1Business.3
1ARisk Factors.8
1BUnresolved Staff Comments.16
2Properties.17
3Legal Proceedings.25
4Mine Safety Disclosures.25
   
 Part II 
5Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.26
6Selected Financial Data.28
7Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.30
7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.56
8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.58
9Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.59
9AControls and Procedures.59
9BOther Information.60
   
 Part III 
10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.61
11Executive Compensation.66
12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.87
13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.89
14Principal Accountant Fees and Services.90
   
 Part IV 
15Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.91
   
 Signatures152

2
Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

General Development of the Business

In this 10-K, “we”, “us”, “our”, “MREIC” or “the Company”, refers to Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, together with its predecessors and subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

We are a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). Our investment focus is to own well-located, modern, single tenant,single-tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. We were founded in 1968 and arehave been publicly owned since that time, making us one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world. We intend to maintain our qualification as a REIT in the future. As a REIT, with limited exceptions, we will not be taxed under Federal and certain state income tax laws at the corporate level on taxable income that we distribute to our shareholders. For special tax provisions applicable to REITs, refer to Sections 856-860 of the Code. We are subject to franchise taxes in several of the states in which we own properties.

In December 2017, as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the TCJA), Code Section 199A was added to the Code and became effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026. Under the TCJA, subject to certain income limitations, an individual taxpayer and estates and trusts may deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of qualified REIT dividends they receive from their taxable income. Qualified REIT dividends do not include any portion of a dividend received from a REIT that is classified as a capital gain dividend or qualified dividend income.

We were established in 1968 as a New Jersey Business Trust (NJBT). In 1990, the NJBT merged into a newly formed Delaware corporation. On May 15, 2003, we changed our state of incorporation from Delaware to Maryland by merging with and into a Maryland corporation.

Narrative As previously announced, on November 5, 2021, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Industrial Logistics Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“ILPT”), under which, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, ILPT will acquire us in an all-cash transaction, with our common stockholders receiving $21.00 in cash for each outstanding share of our common stock in connection with consummation of the transaction. ILPT’s acquisition of us is subject to obtaining the requisite approval of our common stockholders and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Upon closing of the merger with ILPT, holders of our outstanding 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”) will receive the amount of $25 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. We plan to continue to pay our regular quarterly common stock dividend and our Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock dividend for each full quarterly dividend period completed prior to the closing of the transaction. This transaction with ILPT represents the culmination of the publicly announced comprehensive strategic alternatives review processes conducted by our Board of Directors during 2021. Our Board re-initiated its strategic alternatives review process in September 2021 after a previous agreement for a merger that we entered into with another party, following a strategic alternatives review process earlier this year, did not receive the requisite approval of our stockholders.

3
Table of Contents

Description of Business

Our primary business is the ownership and management of industrial real estate.estate properties. Our investment focus is to own well-located, modern, single tenant,single-tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. In addition, we own a portfolio of REIT investment securities which we generally limit to no more than approximately 10% of our undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).

As of September 30, 2018, we had 14 full-time employees and one part-time employee.

At September 30, 2018,2021, we held investments in 111122 properties totaling approximately 21,174,00024.9 million square feet with an overall occupancy rate of 99.6%99.7% (See Item 2 for a detailed description of the properties). As of the fiscal yearend, our weighted average lease expiration was 7.0 years, our annualized average base rent per occupied square foot was $6.61 and the weighted average building age, based on the square footage of our buildings, was 10.2 years. These properties are located in 3032 states: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. All of these properties are 100% owned by us, directly or through wholly-owned subsidiaries, with the exception of the two propertiesone property in New Jersey in which we own a majority interest. All of our investment properties which we have investments are leased on a net basis except for an industrial park in Monaca (Pittsburgh), Pennsylvania and theour only non-industrial asset, which is a shopping center, located in Somerset, New Jersey. Our investments are primarily located in strategic locations and, in many cases our buildings are highly automated in order to serve the omni-channel distribution networks that have become essential today. Approximately 83% of our revenue is derived from investment-grade tenants, or their subsidiaries as defined by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and by Moody’s (www.moodys.com). The references in this report to S&P Global Ratings and Moody’s are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information of S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on such websites.

Our portfolio of modern, net-leased industrial properties continues to provide shareholders with reliable and predictable income streams. Our resilient high occupancy rates and rent collection results highlight the mission-critical nature of our assets and underscore the essential need for our tenants’ operations. Furthermore, because our weighted average lease term is 7.0 years and our weighted average fixed rate mortgage debt maturity is 10.9 years, we expect our cash flow to remain resilient over long periods of time. Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic, our overall occupancy rate has been over 99% and is currently 99.7%. Our base rent collections remained strong, averaging 99.9% throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic and we expect future months to be consistent with this trend.

US industrial real estate market conditions are as strong as they have ever been with record high asking rents, a robust development pipeline, and an all-time high occupancy rate of 96%. Companies are leasing space at record levels to handle the large increase in ecommerce sales as well as the need for safety stock to counter supply chain disruptions. Construction costs are rising dramatically due to the long lead times for sourcing materials. The amount of new construction for US industrial real estate has been increasing for several years as more industrial space is needed to handle direct-to-consumer distribution. It is estimated that ecommerce sales require three times the amount of warehouse space relative to brick and mortar retail sales. These new buildings are often highly automated and have much larger truck courts and parking requirements. Because modern industrial buildings are built to handle both wholesale distribution as well as direct to consumer distribution, they are known as omni-channel facilities. The West coast ports are continuing to experience severe bottlenecks in processing imports and as a result much container traffic is being diverted towards the Gulf and East coast ports. Given our geographic footprint, this trend is a very favorable one for us. For further discussion of potential impact of competitive conditions on our business, see Item 1A: Risk Factors below.

During fiscal 2018,2021, we purchased sevenfour industrial properties totaling approximately 2,655,0001.6 million square feet situated on 316.2 acres resulting in a very expansive land to building ratio of 8.8 to 1. All four properties are leased to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries, with net-leased terms ranging from 1015 to 1520 years, resulting in a weighted average lease maturity of 11.417.1 years. Approximately 2,255,000Three of the four properties, consisting of 903,000 square feet, or 85%58% of the total square footage of the four properties, purchased, are leased to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries, of which, approximately 761,000 square feet, or 29%, is leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX) or FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., a subsidiary of FDX.FedEx Corporation (FDX). The aggregate purchase price for the sevenfour properties was approximately $282,332,000.$258.4 million. These four properties are located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Oklahomathe following Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs): Columbus, OH, Atlanta, GA, Burlington, VT and South Carolina.Knoxville, TN. These sevenfour properties are expected to generate annualized rental income over the life of their leases of approximately $17,414,000.$15.2 million. In connection with two of the sevenfour properties acquired during the 20182021 fiscal year, we entered into fourone 17 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan and one 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan. In connection with the remaining two properties acquired during the 2021 fiscal year, we entered into commitments for two, 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loans, two 14 yearwhich have not yet closed. These four fully-amortizing mortgage loans and one 10 year loan amortizing over 18have a weighted average term of 15.7 years. The sevenprincipal amount of the four mortgage loans originally totaled $175,160,000$161.8 million with an original weighted average mortgage loan maturity of 14.1 years andfixed interest rates ranging from 2.50% to 3.25%, resulting in a weighted average fixed interest rate of 3.91%2.89%.

34
Table of Contents

During fiscal 2021, we completed the first phase of a two-phase parking expansion project for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. at our property located in Olathe (Kansas City), KS. The first phase of this parking expansion project was completed for a total cost of $3.4 million, resulting in an initial increase in annual rent effective November 5, 2020 of approximately $340,000 from approximately $2.1 million, or $6.83 per square foot, to approximately $2.5 million, or $7.91 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent increased by 2.1% on June 1, 2021 and will continue to increase 2.1% every five years, resulting in an annualized rent from November 5, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of approximately $2.6 million, or $8.15 per square foot. We recently began construction on the second phase of this parking expansion project at this location, which upon completion will further increase the rental rate and extend the lease term. In addition, effective June 4, 2021, we completed a parking lot expansion for UPS at our property located in Halfmoon (Albany), NY for a cost of approximately $835,000, resulting in an initial increase in annual rent effective on the date of completion of approximately $52,000 from approximately $510,000, or $6.80 per square foot, to approximately $562,000, or $7.50 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will continue to increase each year by 2.0% resulting in an annualized rent from June 4, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of approximately $622,000, or $8.29 per square foot. Due to the proliferation of ecommerce sales and last mile deliveries, it is important to take into account the large amounts of real estate utilized for trailer, van, and car parking at many of our properties in determining how our in-place rental rates compare to market rental rates for properties being used in a similar manner. Rents per square foot on properties that may be nearby, but have only limited acreage devoted to parking, are poor comparisons as they cannot accommodate the same tenant needs.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 291,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 46.0 acres, located in the Birmingham, AL MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through July 2036. The purchase price was $30.2 million. We obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.40%, which has not yet closed. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $1.7 million.

In addition to the $30.2 million property purchased in October 2021, we have entered into agreements to purchase three new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Alabama, Georgia and Texas, totaling 1.1 million square feet. These future acquisitions have net-leased terms ranging from 10 to 15 years with a weighted average lease term of 12.6 years. The total purchase price for these three properties is $126.8 million. All three properties are leased to companies, or subsidiaries of companies, that are considered Investment Grade by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and by Moody’s (www.moodys.com). Two of these three properties, consisting of an aggregate of 563,000 square feet, or 52% of the total leasable area, are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing all three of these transactions during fiscal 2022.

We have several FedEx Ground parking expansion projects in progress with more under discussion. Currently there are nine parking expansion projects underway, which we expect to cost approximately $42.6 million. These parking expansion projects will enable us to capture additional rent while lengthening the terms of these leases. We are also in discussions to expand the parking at eight additional locations bringing the total recently completed and likely future parking lot expansion projects to 18 currently.

We may have additional acquisitions and expansions in fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2023, and the funds for these acquisitions are expected to come from funds generated from operations, mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, sales of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP), proceeds from the sale of common stock in a possible future at-the-market public offering (similar to our previous common stock at-the-market offering) and proceeds from private placements and other public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities. To the extent that funds or appropriate properties are not available, fewer acquisitions will be made.

On January 14, 2021, our Board of Directors approved a 5.9% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.18 per share from $0.17 per share representing an annualized dividend rate of $0.72 per share. This increase was the third dividend increase in the past five years, representing a total increase of 20%. We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 30 consecutive years. We are also one of the few REITs that maintained its dividend throughout the Global Financial Crisis.

On October 1, 2018,2021, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.17$0.18 per share, to be paid on December 17, 2018,15, 2021, to common shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2018,2021, which represents an annualized common dividend rate of $0.68$0.72 per share. We intend to pay these distributions from cash flows from operations.

5
Table of Contents

We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 27 consecutive years. On October 1, 2015, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly common stock cash dividend from $0.15 per share to $0.16 per share representing a 6.7% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. Then again, most recently, on October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly common stock cash dividend and from $0.16 per share to $0.17 per share on October 2, 2017, representing a 6.3% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. These two dividend raises represent a total increase of 13%.

Our common stock dividend policy is dependent upon our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, availability and cost of bank financing and other factors considered relevant by the Board of Directors. It is our intention to continue making comparable quarterly distributions in the future and to grow our distributions over time.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 19, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 347,145 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.0 acres, located in Trenton, NJ. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2032. The purchase price was $85,248,352. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $5,328,000.

The industrial property purchased thus far during fiscal 2019 increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 21,521,000.

In addition to the property purchased subsequent to our fiscal yearend, as described above, we have entered into agreements to purchase two new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Georgia and North Carolina, consisting of approximately 398,000 square feet, with net-leased terms ranging from 10 to 15 years, with a weighted average lease term of 13.4 years.  The purchase price for these properties is approximately $68,747,000 and both are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing these transactions during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020.  In connection with one of these properties, we have entered into a commitment to obtain a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $17,500,000 with a fixed interest rate of 4.40%. We currently have one 154,800 square foot property expansion in progress at our property located in Monroe, OH which is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2019 for a total project cost of approximately $9,072,000. The expansion will result in a new 15 year lease which will extend the prior lease expiration date from February 2030 to January 2034. In addition, the expansion will result in an increase in initial annual rent effective from the date of completion by approximately $862,000 from approximately $961,000 to approximately $1,823,000. In addition, the annual rent will increase 2% per annum. We may have additional acquisitions and expansions in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020, and the funds for these acquisitions may come from funds generated from operations, mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, sale of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP), proceeds from the At-The-Market Preferred Equity Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program), and proceeds from private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities. To the extent that funds or appropriate properties are not available, fewer acquisitions will be made.

Currently, we derive our income primarily from real estate rental operations. Rental and Reimbursement Revenue (excluding Lease Termination Income in fiscal 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 of $210,261,$377,000, $-0-, and $-0-, respectively) was $139,161,849, $116,385,305$182.8 million, $167.8 million and $97,755,433$154.8 million for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Total undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation) were $1,925,443,520$2.6 billion and $1,614,123,838$2.2 billion as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.

4
Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had approximately 21,174,00024.9 million leasable square feet, of property, of which approximately 10,083,00011.6 million square feet, or 48%47%, consisting of 6065 separate stand-alone leases, were leased to FDX and its subsidiaries (7%(5% to FDX and 41%42% to FDX subsidiaries). These properties are located in 2427 different states. As of September 30, 2018,2021, the 6065 separate stand-alone leases that are leased to FDX and FDX subsidiaries had a weighted average lease maturity of 9.47.5 years. As of September 30, 2018,2021, in addition to FDX and its subsidiaries, the only tenantother tenants that leased 5% or more of our total square footage was FDX (including its subsidiaries).

During fiscal 2018, the only tenant that accountedwere subsidiaries of Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon), which are parties to five separate stand-alone leases for 5% or moreproperties located in four different states, containing 1.5 million total square feet, comprising 6% of our rentaltotal leasable square feet. None of our properties are subject to a master lease or any cross-collateralization agreements.

Our Rental and reimbursement revenue was FDX (including its subsidiaries). Our rental and reimbursement revenueReimbursement Revenue from FDX and its subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, totaled approximately $80,726,000, $68,151,000$104.3 million, $96.4 million and $52,793,000,$93.3 million, or 58% (7% from FDXcalculated as a percentage of total rent and 51% from FDX subsidiaries), 59% (7%reimbursement revenues were, 57% (5% from FDX and 52% from FDX subsidiaries) and 55% (9%, 58% (5% from FDX and 46%53% from FDX subsidiaries), and 60% (5% from FDX and 55% from FDX subsidiaries). In addition to FDX and its subsidiaries, the only tenants to comprise 5% or more of our total rentRental and reimbursement revenues.Reimbursement Revenue were subsidiaries of Amazon, which represented 6% of our Rental and Reimbursement Revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020. Rental and Reimbursement Revenue from subsidiaries of Amazon for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 was less than 5% of our Rental and Reimbursement Revenue.

FDX is a publicly-owned companyand Amazon are publicly-listed companies and financial information related to this entity isthese entities are available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. FDX isand Amazon are rated “BBB” and “AA”, respectively by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and isare rated “Baa2” and “A1”, respectively by Moody’s (www.moodys.com), which are both considered “Investment Grade” ratings. The references in this report to the SEC’s website, S&P Global Ratings’ website and Moody’s website are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information of FDX, Amazon, S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on such websites.

In addition to real estate property holdings, we held $154,920,545 in marketable REIT securities at September 30, 2018, representing 8.0% of our undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). These liquid real estate holdings are not included in calculating the tenant concentration ratios above and therefore further increase our diversification. The securities portfolio provides us with additional diversification, liquidity, and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available.

Our weighted-averageweighted average lease expiration was 8.17.0 years and 7.97.1 years as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, and our average annualized rent per occupied square foot as of September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 was $6.01$6.61 and $5.93,$6.36, respectively. Our overall occupancy rate as of September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 was 99.6%99.7% and 99.3%99.4%, respectively. Our weighted average lease expiration has been 7.0 years or greater for over seven consecutive years. Our overall occupancy rate has been 98.9% or above for over six consecutive years.

We compete with other investors in real estate for attractive investment opportunities. These investors include other equity real estate investment trusts, limited partnerships, syndications and private investors, among others. Competition in the market areas in which we operate is significant and affects our ability to acquire or expand properties,acquisitions, occupancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses of certain properties. We have built long-term relationships within our tenant base as well as within the merchant builder community. These relationships have historically provided us with investment opportunities that fit our investment policy. The amount of new construction of industrial properties on the national level has been increasing the past six years following several years of historically low levels of new supply. These levels of new supply, although increasing, continue to be below historical norms. Driven to a large extent by the continued growth in ecommerce sales, demand for industrial space remains very strong, driving national occupancy rates to an all-time high of 95% currently. For further discussion of potential impact of competitive conditions on our business, see Item 1A: Risk Factors below.

Industrial space demand is very closely correlated to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth. Despite nine years of unprecedented monetary stimulus, real annual GDP growth averaged less than 2.0% over this period. Economic growth has been strong this past year further increasing demand for industrial space. The most significant demand driver for modern industrial real estate continues to be ecommerce. Every year since the turn of the century, the percentage of goods purchased on-line has increased at an average 16% annual growth rate. Today, excluding food, fuel, and autos, approximately 19% of total retail sales have migrated from traditional store sales to on-line sales and we expect this growth in market share to continue. We expect these favorable trends for the industrial real estate sector to be a leading demand driver for the foreseeable future, as consumers continue to embrace the added efficiencies of on-line consumption. The strong financial position of our tenants, together with the long duration of our leases, provides for high quality, reliable income streams throughout the business cycle.

56
Table of Contents

Information about our Executive Officers

We continue

The following table sets forth information with respect to invest in marketable securities of other REITs, which we generally limit to no more than approximately 10% of our undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). Our investments in equity securities of other REITs provide us with additional diversification, liquidity, and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available. From time to time, we may purchase these securities on margin when the interest and dividend yields exceed the cost of funds. In general, we may borrow up to 50% of the value of the marketable securities, which was $154,920,545executive officers as of September 30, 2018. 2021:

NameAgePosition
Eugene W. Landy87Chairman of the Board and Founder
Michael P. Landy59President and Chief Executive Officer
Kevin S. Miller51Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Michael D. Prashad36General Counsel
Richard P. Molke36Vice President of Asset Management

Human Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had borrowings of $26,608,676 under our margin line, bearing interest at 2.75%. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan. As of September 30, 2017, we had borrowings of $10,091,417 under our margin line, bearing interest at 2.05%. The REIT securities portfolio provides us with additional income, and to the extent not pledged to secure borrowings, provides us with additional liquidity. Such securities are subject to risks arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, primarily market price risk relating to equity securities and interest rate risk relating to debt securities. From time to time, we may use derivative instruments to mitigate interest rate risk, however, this has not occurred during any periods presented. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, we had $154,920,545 and $123,764,770, respectively, of securities available for sale. The unrealized net gain (loss) on securities available for sale at September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $(24,744,579) and $6,570,565, respectively, resulting in a decrease for the fiscal year of $31,315,144. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, our net realized gains from the sale of securities were $111,387, $2,311,714 and $4,398,599, respectively.

On June 29, 2017, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or B. Riley (formerly FBR Capital Markets & Co.), that provided for the offer and sale of shares14 full-time employees. Women represent 57% of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share,employees with 37.5% holding management level/leadership roles. Employees are offered great flexibility to meet personal and family needs. We endeavor to maintain workplaces that are free from discrimination or harassment on the basis of color, race, sex, national origin, ethnicity, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identification or expression or any other status protected by applicable law. We conduct training to prevent harassment and discrimination and monitor employee conduct year-round. Recruitment, hiring, development, training, compensation and advancement at the Company are based on the individual’s qualifications, performance, skills and experience. Our employees are fairly compensated, without regard to gender, race and ethnicity, and routinely recognized for outstanding performance. Our compensation program is designed to attract and retain talent. We continually assess and strive to enhance employee satisfaction and engagement. Our employees, many of whom have a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, or our 6.125% Series C preferred stock, having an aggregate sales price of uplong tenure with the Company, frequently express satisfaction with management. Our employees are offered regular opportunities to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) with B. Riley that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000 of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock. We began selling shares through these programs on July 3, 2017. Since inception through September 30, 2018, we sold 3,088,001 shares under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000, of which 1,648,556 shares were sold during the fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $40,094,000. As of September 30, 2018, there is approximately $119,096,000 remaining that may be sold under the Preferred Stock ATM Program.participate in professional development programs.

As of September 30, 2018, 11,488,001 shares of the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, in October 2018, we completed a public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $132,339,000.

Investment and Other Policies

Our investment policy is to concentrate our investments in well-located, modern, single-tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. Our strategy is to obtain a favorable yield spread between the income from the net-leased industrial properties and interest costs. In addition, we believe that investments in well-located, modern industrial properties provide a potential for long-term capital appreciation. There is the risk that, upon expiration of leases, the properties will become vacant or will be re-leased at lower rents. The results obtained from re-leasing the properties will depend on the market for industrial properties at that time.

6
Table of Contents

In fiscal 2018,2021, approximately 8%5% of our gross leasable area, representing 16ten leases totaling 1,546,6371.2 million square feet, was set to expire. WeAll ten of these leases have been renewed, 11 of the 16 leases that were set to expire. One of the 11 leases, which is with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.resulting in a 100% retention rate for a property located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC, renewed for only four months because the tenant moved its operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to a newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. We purchased this new facility on August 15, 2018. Excluding this four month lease renewal, the ten leases that have renewed, represent 972,048 square feet, or 63% of the expiring square footage, and have a weighted average lease term of 6.84.2 years. These ten lease renewals resultresulted in a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $5.87$4.77 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot also results in ais $4.66. This compares to the former weighted average lease raterent of $5.87$4.49 per square foot. This representsfoot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $4.64 per square foot, resulting in an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 4.08%6.2% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 2.80%0.4% on a cash basis. Five of the sixteen leases, representing 482,813 square feet or 31% of the expiring square footage, did not renew. Three of these five buildings, representing 183,837 square feet or 12% of the expiring square footage, have been sold and one of the remaining five properties, representing 218,120 square or 14% of the expiring square footage, has been re-tenanted.

We seek to invest in well-located, modern, single tenant,single-tenant, industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. In management’s opinion, the recently acquired facilities meet these criteria. We have a concentration of properties leased to FDX and FDX subsidiaries.subsidiaries and to subsidiaries of Amazon. This is a risk that shareholders should consider. FDX is a publicly-owned companyand Amazon are publicly-listed companies and financial information related to this entity isthese entities are available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. FDX isand Amazon are rated “BBB” and “AA”, respectively by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and isare rated “Baa2” and “A1”, respectively by Moody’s (www.moodys.com), which are both considered “Investment Grade” ratings. The references in this report to the SEC’s website, S&P Global Ratings’ website and Moody’s website are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information of FDX, Amazon, S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on such websites.

7
Table of Contents

We may issuehave considered issuing securities for property; however, this has not occurred to date. We may repurchase or reacquire our shares from time to time if, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, such acquisition is in our best interest. NoOn September 14, 2021, our Board of Directors reaffirmed our Common Stock Repurchase Program (the “Program”) that authorizes us to purchase up to $50.0 million of shares were repurchased or reacquired during fiscal 2018 and, as of September 30, 2018, we do not own any of our own shares.common stock. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchase will be determined by us at our discretion and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The Program does not have a termination date and may be suspended or discontinued at our discretion without prior notice. During fiscal 2020, we repurchased 400,000 shares of our common stock for $4.3 million at an average price of $10.69 per share. These were the only repurchases made under the Program thus far.

Property Management

With the exception of threetwo properties, all of our 111122 properties are self-managed by us.

WeFor the properties we self-manage, we paid fees directly to local property management subagents of approximately $437,000, $394,000$518,000, $482,000 and $356,000$468,000 for fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

Governmental Regulations

Our industrial properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory laws and requirements, including, but not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act, zoning regulations, building codes and land use laws, and building, occupancy and other permit requirements. Noncompliance could result in Stow, OHthe imposition of governmental fines or the award of damages to private litigants. While we believe that we are currently in material compliance with these regulatory requirements, the requirements may change or new requirements may be imposed that could require significant unanticipated expenditures by us. Additionally, local zoning and Streetsboro, OH are managed by GEIS Companies (GEIS). Management fees we paidland use laws, environmental statutes and other governmental requirements may restrict, or negatively impact, our property operations, or expansion, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities and such regulations may prevent us from taking advantage of economic opportunities. Future changes in federal, state or local tax regulations applicable to GEIS forREITs, real property or income derived from our real estate, which may be retroactive, could impact the fiscal yearsfinancial performance, operations, and value of our properties and the Company.

Tax Regulation

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, commencing with our taxable year which ended September 30, 2018, 20171968. Our qualification and 2016 were approximately $78,000, $52,000taxation as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet on a continuing basis, through actual annual operating results, distribution levels and $50,000, respectively. These management fees were reimburseddiversity of stock ownership, the various qualification tests and organizational requirements imposed under the Code, as discussed below. We believe that we are organized and have operated in such a manner as to qualify under the Code for taxation as a REIT since our inception, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner.

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, two separate percentage tests relating to the source of our gross income must be satisfied annually. First, at least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year generally must be derived directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property (including dividends paid by other REITs, mortgages on real property, “rents from real property,” gain, and, in certain circumstances, interest) or from certain types of temporary investments. Second, at least 95% of our gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year must be derived from such real property investments described above, dividends, interest and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, or from any combination of the foregoing. Rents received by us will qualify as “rents from real property” in satisfying the above gross income tests only if several conditions are met. First, the amount of rent generally must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, amounts received or accrued generally will not be excluded from “rents from real property” solely by the tenants.

Our industrialreason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of gross receipts or sales. Second, rents received from a tenant will not qualify as “rents from real property” if we, or a direct or indirect owner of 10% or more of our stock, actually or constructively own 10% or more of such tenant. Third, if rent attributable to personal property that is leased in Carlstadt, NJ is owned by Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLC. We own 51%connection with a lease of Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLC. Thisreal property is managed by Marcus Associates, an entity affiliatedgreater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to such personal property will not qualify as “rents from real property.” This 15% test is based on relative fair market values of the real and personal property. Generally, for rents to qualify as “rents from real property” for the purposes of the gross income tests, we are only allowed to provide services that are both “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the ownerrental of real property and not otherwise considered “rendered to the occupant.” Further, for the rent paid pursuant to our leases to qualify for purposes of the 49% non-controlling interest. Management fees paid by Palmer Terrace Realty Associates, LLCgross income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. We structure our leases to Marcus Associates were approximately $17,000, $16,000generate qualifying income.

8
Table of Contents

In addition to the income tests discussed above, to maintain our qualification as a REIT, at the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must satisfy seven tests relating to the nature of our assets. We limit our investments to assets that will allow us to meet these requirements:

At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by “real estate assets”, cash, cash items and government securities, as such terms are defined in the Code.
Not more than 25% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities, other than those in the 75% asset class.
Except for certain investments in REITs, taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRSs) and other securities in the 75% asset class, the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets.
Except for certain investments in REITs, TRSs and other securities in the 75% asset class, we may not own more than 10% of the total voting power of any one issuer’s outstanding securities.
Except for certain investments in REITs, TRSs and other securities in the 75% asset class, we may not own more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer, other than securities that qualify for the debt safe harbors.
The aggregate value of all securities of TRSs held by us may not exceed 20% of the value of our gross assets.
No more than 25% of the value of our total assets may consist of debt instruments issued by “publicly offered REITs” (i.e., a REIT that is required to file annual and periodic reports with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) to the extent such debt instruments are not secured by real property or interests in real property.

Finally, in order to qualify as a REIT, we must, among other requirements, distribute, each year, to our shareholders at least 90 percent of our taxable income, excluding net capital gains. To the extent that we satisfy the 90 percent distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100 percent of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income and $16,000 formay incur a 4 percent nondeductible excise tax on the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017amount not distributed. As a result, we distribute substantially all of our taxable income in each year, and 2016, respectively.must seek other sources of capital to fund our operations and growth.

Environmental Matters

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, an owner of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under such property as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances. These liabilities may include government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances. Although generally our tenants are primarily responsible for any environmental damages and claims related to the leased premises, in the event of the bankruptcy or inability of a tenant of such premises to satisfy any obligations with respect to such environmental liability, we may be required to satisfy such obligations. In addition, as the owner of such properties, we may be held directly liable for any such damages or claims irrespective of the provisions of any lease.

 

From time to time, in connection with managing the properties or upon acquisition of a property, we authorize the preparation of Phase I and, when necessary, Phase II environmental reports with respect to our properties. Based upon such environmental reports and our ongoing review of our properties, as of the date of this Annual Report, we are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of our properties which we believe would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and/or results of operations. There can be no assurance, however, that (1) the discovery of environmental conditions, the existence or severity of which were previously unknown; (2) changes in law; (3) the conduct of tenants; or (4) activities relating to properties in the vicinity of our properties, will not expose us to material liability in the future.

Contact Information

Additional information about us can be found on our website which is located atwww.mreic.reit. Information contained on or hyperlinked from our Website is not incorporated by reference into and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We make available, free of charge, on or through our website, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

79
Table of Contents

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors address the material risks concerning our business. If any of the risks discussed in this report were to occur, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operation and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our shareholders could be materially and adversely affected and the market price per share of our stock could decline significantly. Some statements in this report, including statements in the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Risks Relating to our Proposed Merger with ILPT

 

ILPT’s acquisition of us pursuant to the Merger Agreement is subject to various closing conditions and other risks which may cause the merger to be delayed or not completed at all or have other adverse consequences. Our proposed merger with ILPT is subject to various closing conditions that must be satisfied or waived to complete the merger, including approval by the holders of two-thirds of our outstanding common stock. There can be no assurance that these conditions will be satisfied or waived or that the merger will be completed in a timely manner or at all. Failure to satisfy or obtain waivers of any closing conditions may jeopardize or delay the completion of the merger and result in additional expenditures of money and resources. There is no assurance that our stockholders will approve the merger with ILPT by the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of our outstanding common stock, as required by Maryland law and our charter. If the merger is not completed for any reason, the price of our Common Stock may decline to the extent that the current market price reflects an assumption that the merger will be consummated and our stockholders will not receive any payment for their shares in connection with the merger. Legal proceedings instituted against us and others relating to the Merger Agreement with ILPT also could delay or prevent the merger from becoming effective within the agreed upon timeframe. In addition, we or ILPT may elect to terminate the Merger Agreement in certain circumstances, and the parties can mutually decide to terminate the Merger Agreement at any time prior to the consummation of the merger, either before or after stockholder approval. Further, uncertainty among our employees about their future roles after the completion of the proposed merger may impair our ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel, and the proposed merger may disrupt our business relationships with our existing and potential tenants, suppliers, financing sources and other business partners, who may attempt to negotiate changes in existing business relationships or consider entering into business relationships with parties other than us. Any adverse consequence of the merger could be exacerbated by any delays in completion of the merger or termination of the Merger Agreement. Termination of the Merger Agreement could materially adversely affect our business operations and financial results, which in turn would materially and adversely affect the price of our common stock.

We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant transaction and related costs in connection with the proposed merger, our Board of Directors’ review of strategic alternatives, and related matters. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur substantial costs associated with our strategic review processes, the proposed merger with ILPT and our previous merger agreement with Equity Commonwealth, which was terminated after it did not receive the requisite approval of our stockholders. Such costs include the payment of certain fees and expenses incurred in connection with the proposed merger with ILPT and the terminated merger agreement with Equity Commonwealth, including legal and other professional advisory fees as well as the reimbursement of approximately $10 million of transaction expenses incurred by Equity Commonwealth and, in the event our common stockholders do not approve the merger agreement with ILPT and as a result the merger agreement is terminated, a similar reimbursement of up to $10 million of ILPT’s expenses. We have also incurred significant expenses in connection with litigation and potential litigation involving one of our shareholders, Blackwells Capital LLC, and our former general counsel, and in settling such litigation and potential litigation in November 2021. Additional unanticipated costs also may be incurred.

Under the Merger Agreement with ILPT, we are subject to restrictions on our business activities. The Merger Agreement contains numerous restrictions on our business activities while the merger is pending, including, among other things, restrictions on our ability to acquire other businesses and assets, dispose of our assets, make investments, enter into certain contracts, repurchase or issue securities, pay dividends, make capital expenditures, amend our organizational documents, incur indebtedness and settle litigation. These restrictions could prevent us from pursuing strategic business opportunities, taking actions with respect to our business that we may consider advantageous and responding effectively and/or timely to competitive pressures and industry developments, which may as a result materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Real Estate Industry Risks

Our business and financial results are affected by local real estate conditions in areas where we own properties.We may be affected adversely by general economic conditions and local real estate conditions. For example, an oversupply of industrial properties in a local area or a decline in the attractiveness of our properties to tenants and potential tenants could have a negative effect on us.

Other factors that may affect general economic conditions or local real estate conditions include but are not limited to:

population and demographic trends;
employment and personal income trends;
zoning, use and other regulatory restrictions;
income tax laws;
changes in interest rates and availability and costs of financing; and
competition from other available real estate.

We may be unable to compete with our larger competitors and other alternatives available to tenants or potential tenants of our properties. The real estate business is highly competitive. We compete for properties with other real estate investors and purchasers, including other real estate investment trusts, limited partnerships, syndications and private investors, some of whom may have greater financial resources, revenues and geographical diversity than we have. Furthermore, we compete for tenants with other property owners. All of our industrial properties are subject to significant local competition. We also compete with a wide variety of institutions and other investors for capital funds necessary to support our investment activities and asset growth. To the extent that we are unable to effectively compete in the marketplace, our business may be adversely affected.

We are subject to significant regulation that inhibits our activities and may increase our costs.Local zoning and use laws, environmental statutes and other governmental requirements may restrict expansion, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities. These regulations may prevent us from taking advantage of economic opportunities. Legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act may require us to modify our properties at a substantial cost and noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. Future legislation may impose additional requirements. We may incur additional costs to comply with any future requirements.

Our investments are concentrated in the industrial distribution sector and our business would be adversely affected by an economic downturn in that sector.Our investments in real estate assets are primarily concentrated in the industrial distribution sector. This concentration may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in this sector to a greater extent than if our business activities included a more significant portion of other sectors of the real estate industry.

810
Table of Contents

Risks Associated with Our Properties

We may be unable to renew or extend leases or re-let space as leases expire.While we seek to invest in well-located, modern, single tenant,single-tenant, industrial buildings, leased to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases, a number of our properties are subject to short-term leases. When a lease expires, a tenant may elect not to renew or extend it. We may not be able to re-let the property on similar terms, if we are able to re-let the property at all. The terms of renewal, extension or re-lease (including the cost of required renovations and/or concessions to tenants) may be less favorable to us than the prior lease. If we are unable to re-let all or a substantial portion of our properties, or if the rental rates upon such re-letting are significantly lower than expected rates, our cash generated before debt repayments and capital expenditures and our ability to make expected distributions, may be adversely affected. We have established an annual budget for renovation and re-letting expenses that we believe is reasonable in light of each property’s operating history and local market characteristics. However, this budget may not be sufficient to cover these expenses.

 

Our business is substantially dependent on FedEx Corporationcertain tenants.FDX, together with its subsidiaries, is our largest tenant, consisting of 6065 separate stand-alone leases located in 2427 different states as of September 30, 2018.2021. As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had approximately 21,174,00024.9 million square feet of property, of which approximately 10,083,00011.6 million square feet, or 48%47%, were leased to FDX and its subsidiaries (7%(5% from FDX and 41%42% from FDX subsidiaries). As of September 30, 2021, in addition to FDX and its subsidiaries, the only tenants that leased 5% or more of our total square footage were subsidiaries of Amazon, which are parties to five separate stand-alone leases for properties located in four different states, containing 1.5 million total square feet, comprising 6% of our total leasable square feet. Rental and reimbursement revenue from FDX and its subsidiaries is approximately 58% (7%was 57% (5% from FDX and 51%52% from FDX subsidiaries) of total rental and reimbursement revenue for fiscal 2018. No other tenant accounted for2021. In addition to FDX and its subsidiaries, the only tenants to comprise 5% or more of our total Rental and Reimbursement revenueRevenue were subsidiaries of Amazon, which represented 6% of our Rental and Reimbursement Revenue for the fiscal 2018. year ended September 30, 2021. None of our properties are subject to a master lease or any cross-collateralization agreements.

As a result of this concentration with FDX and its subsidiaries and with subsidiaries of Amazon, our business, financial condition and results of operations, including the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders, could be adversely affected if we are unable to do business with FDXthem or FDX reduces itsif they reduced their business with us or FDX and its subsidiariesif they were to become unable to make lease payments because of a downturn in itstheir business or otherwise.

FDX is a publicly-owned companyand Amazon are publicly-listed companies and financial information related to this entity isthese entities are available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. FDX is rated “BBB” by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and is rated “Baa2” by Moody’s (www.moodys.com), which are both considered “Investment Grade” ratings. The references in this report to the SEC’s website, S&P Global Ratings’ website and Moody’s website are not intended to and do not include or incorporate by reference into this report the information of FDX, S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on such websites.

We are subject to risks involved in single tenant leases.single-tenant leases. We focus our acquisition activities on real properties that are net-leased to single tenants.single-tenants. Therefore, the financial failure of, or other default by, a single tenantsingle-tenant under its lease is likely to cause a significant reduction in the operating cash flow generated by the property leased to that tenant and might decrease the value of that property. In addition, we will be responsible for 100% of the operating costs following a vacancy at a single tenantsingle-tenant building.

 

We may be affected negatively by tenant financial difficulties and leasing delays.At any time, a tenant may experience a downturn in its business that may weaken its financial condition. Similarly, a general decline in the economy may result in a decline in the demand for space at our industrial properties. As a result, our tenants may delay lease commencement, fail to make rental payments when due, or declare bankruptcy. Any such event could result in the termination of that tenant’s lease and losses to us.

 

We receive a substantial portion of our income as rents under long-term leases.If tenants are unable to comply with the terms of their leases because of rising costs or falling revenues, we in our sole discretion, may deem it advisable to modify lease terms to allow tenants to pay a lower rental rate or a smaller share of operating costs, taxes and insurance. If a tenant becomes insolvent or bankrupt, we cannot be sure that we could recover the premises from the tenant promptly or from a trustee or debtor-in-possession in any bankruptcy proceeding relating to the tenant. We also cannot be sure that we would receive rent in the proceeding sufficient to cover our expenses with respect to the premises. If a tenant becomes bankrupt, the federal bankruptcy code will apply and, in some instances, may restrict the amount and recoverability of our claims against the tenant. A tenant’s default on its obligations to us for any reason could adversely affect our financial condition and the cash we have available for distribution.

 

9
Table of Contents

We may be unable to sell properties when appropriate because real estate investments are illiquid.Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly and, therefore, will tend to limit our ability to vary our property portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the Code may limit our ability to sell our properties. The inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our property portfolio could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to service debt and make distributions to our shareholders.

 

11
Table of Contents

Environmental liabilities could affect our profitability.We face possible environmental liabilities. Environmental laws today can impose liability on a previous owner or operator of a property that owned or operated the property at a time when hazardous or toxic substances were disposed on, or released from, the property. A conveyance of the property, therefore, does not relieve the owner or operator from liability. As a current or former owner and operator of real estate, we may be required by law to investigate and clean up hazardous substances released at or from the properties we currently own or operate or have in the past owned or operated. We may also be liable to the government or to third parties for property damage, investigation costs and cleanup costs. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and costs the government incurs in connection with the contamination. Contamination may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. We are not aware of any environmental liabilities relating to our investment properties which would have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, or results of operations. However, we cannot assure you that environmental liabilities will not arise in the future and that such liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on our business, assets or results of operation.

 

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.We compete with other owners and operators of real estate, some of which own properties similar to ours in the same submarkets in which our properties are located. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain tenants when our tenants’ leases expire. As a result, our financial condition, cash flow and cash available for distribution, the market price of our preferred and common stock and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially and adversely affected.

Coverage under our existing insurance policies may be inadequate to cover losses. Weather conditions and natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, droughts, fires and other environmental conditions can harm our business operations. We generally maintain insurance policies related to our business, including casualty, general liability and other policies, covering our business operations, employees and assets. However, we would be required to bear all losses that are not adequately covered by insurance. In addition, there are certain losses that are not generally insured because it is not economically feasible to insure against them, including losses due to riots or acts of war. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits were to occur with respect to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the properties and, in the case of debt, which is with recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Although we believe that our insurance programs are adequate, we cannot assure you that we will not incur losses in excess of our insurance coverage, or that we will be able to obtain insurance in the future at acceptable levels and reasonable costs.

We may be unable to acquire properties on advantageous terms or acquisitions may not perform as we expect.We have acquired individual properties and intend to continue to do so. However, we may be unable to acquire any of the properties that we may identify as potential acquisition opportunities in the future. Our acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:

when we are able to locate a desired property, competition from other real estate investors may significantly increase the purchase price;
acquired properties may fail to perform as expected;
the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired properties may be higher than our estimates;

10
Table of Contents

acquired properties may be located in new markets where we face risks associated with an incomplete knowledge or understanding of the local market, a limited number of established business relationships in the area and a relative unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures;
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and as a result, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected; and
we may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, to the seller. As a result, if a claim were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to resolve it, which could adversely affect our cash flow and financial condition.

12
Table of Contents

Financing Risks

We face inherent risks associated with our debt incurrence.We finance a portion of our investments in properties and marketable securities through the incurrence of debt. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. In addition, debt creates other risks, including:

rising interest rates on our variable rate debt;
inability to repay or refinance existing debt as it matures, which may result in forced disposition of assets on disadvantageous terms;
one or more lenders under our $200$225 million unsecured line of credit and our $75 million term loan could refuse to fund their financing commitment to us or could fail, and we may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all;
refinancing terms that are less favorable than the terms of existing debt; and
inability to meet required payments of principal and/or interest.

We mortgage many of our properties, which subjects us to the risk of foreclosure in the event of non-payment.We mortgage many of our properties to secure payment of indebtedness and, if we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the property could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a consequent loss of income and asset value. A foreclosure of one or more of our properties could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to service debt and make distributions and the market price of our preferred and common stock.

We face risks related to “balloon payments” and refinancings.Certain mortgages will have significant outstanding principal balances on their maturity dates, commonly known as “balloon payments.” There can be no assurance that we will have the funds available to fund the balloon payment or that we will be able to refinance the debt on favorable terms or at all. To the extent we cannot either pay off or refinance this debt on favorable terms or at all, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms or pay higher interest rates, either of which could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and ability to service debt and make distributions.

We face risks associated with our dependence on external sources of capital.In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required each year to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, and we are subject to tax on our income to the extent it is not distributed. Because of this distribution requirement, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs from cash retained from operations. As a result, to fund capital needs, we rely on third-party sources of capital, which we may not be able to obtain on favorable terms, if at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends upon a number of factors, including (i) general market conditions; (ii) the market’s perception of our growth potential; (iii) our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions; and (iv) the market price of our capital stock. Additional debt financing may substantially increase our debt-to-total capitalization ratio. Additional equity issuances may dilute the holdings of our current shareholders.

11
Table of Contents

We may become more highly leveraged, resulting in increased risk of default on our obligations and an increase in debt service requirements which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions.We have incurred, and may continue to incur, indebtedness in furtherance of our activities.activities. Our governing documents do not limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, our Board of Directors may authorize us to incur additional debt and would do so, for example, if it were necessary to maintain our status as a REIT.debt. We could therefore become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increased risk of default on our obligations and an increase in debt service requirements which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to shareholders.

Fluctuations in interest rates could materially affect our financial results.Because a portion of our debt bears interest at variable rates, increases in interest rates could materially increase our interest expense. If the United States Federal Reserve increases short-term interest rates, this may have a significant upward impact on shorter-term interest rates, including the interest rates that our variable rate debt is based upon. Potential future increases in interest rates and credit spreads may increase our interest expense and affect our ability to obtain fixed rate debt at favorable interest rates and therefore negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations, and reduce our access to the debt or equity capital markets.

13
Table of Contents

The interest rate on our unsecured line of credit facility is based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or Bank of Montreal’s (BMO’s) prime lending rate. All indications are that the LIBOR reference rate will be phased out completely by June 30, 2023. At that point in time, our unsecured line of credit facility will no longer have the LIBOR reference rate available and the reference rate will need to be replaced or we will be required to use BMO’s prime lending rate as a reference rate, which historically has resulted in higher effective interest rates than the LIBOR reference rate. We have very good working relationships with our lenders and all indications we have received from our lenders is that their goal is to have a replacement reference rate for our unsecured line of credit facility. However, because this is the first time a reference rate for our unsecured line of credit facility will stop being published, we cannot be sure how a replacement rate event will conclude. Until we have more clarity from our lenders on how they plan on dealing with a replacement rate event, we cannot be certain of the impact to us.

Covenants in our loan documents could limit our flexibility and adversely affect our financial condition.The terms of our various credit agreements and other indebtedness require us to comply with a number of customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage. These covenants may limit our flexibility in our operations, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness even if we had satisfied our payment obligations. If we were to default under credit agreements or other debt instruments, our financial condition could be adversely affected.

Risks Related to our Status as a REIT

If our leases are not respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes, we would fail to qualify as a REIT.To qualify as a REIT, we must, among other things, satisfy two gross income tests, under which specified percentages of our gross income must be passive income, such as rent. For the rent paid pursuant to our leases to qualify for purposes of the gross income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. The determination of whether a lease is a true lease depends upon an analysis of all the surrounding facts and circumstances. We believe that our leases will be respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes. However, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will agree with this view. If the leases are not respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes, we would not be able to satisfy either of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs, and we could lose our REIT status.

Failure to make required distributions would subject us to additional tax.In order to qualify as a REIT, we must, among other requirements, distribute, each year, to our shareholders at least 90 percent of our taxable income, excluding net capital gains. To the extent that we satisfy the 90 percent distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100 percent of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income. In addition, we will incur a 4 percent nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our distributions (or deemed distributions) and the amounts of income retained on which we have paid corporate income tax in any year are less than the sum of:

85 percent of our ordinary income for that year;
��
95 percent of our capital gain net earnings for that year; and
100 percent of our undistributed taxable income from prior years.

To the extent we pay out in excess of 100 percent of our taxable income for any tax year, we may be able to carry forward such excess to subsequent years to reduce our required distributions for purposes of the 4 percent excise tax in such subsequent years. We intend to pay out our income to our shareholders in a manner intended to satisfy the 90 percent distribution requirement. Differences in timing between the recognition of income and the related cash receipts, the effects of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or the effect of required debt amortization payments could require us to borrow money or sell assets (potentially during unfavorable market conditions) to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the 90 percent distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax.

 

12
Table of Contents

We may not have sufficient cash available from operations to pay distributions, and, therefore, distributions may be made from borrowings.The actual amount and timing of distributions will be determined by our Board of Directors in its discretion and typically will depend on the amount of cash available for distribution, which will depend on items such as current and projected cash requirements, limitations on distributions imposed by law or our financing arrangements and tax considerations. As a result, we may not have sufficient cash available from operations to pay distributions as required to maintain our status as a REIT. Therefore, we may need to borrow funds to make sufficient cash distributions in order to maintain our status as a REIT, which may cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of an increase in borrowed funds for the purpose of paying distributions.

14
Table of Contents

We may be required to pay a penalty tax upon the sale of a property.The federal income tax provisions applicable to REITs provide that any gain realized by a REIT on the sale of property, other than foreclosure property, held as inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a “prohibited transaction” that is subject to a 100 percent penalty tax. Under current law, unless a sale of real property qualifies for a safe harbor, the question of whether the sale of real estate or other property constitutes the sale of property held primarily for sale to customers is generally a question of the facts and circumstances regarding a particular transaction. It is our intent that we and our subsidiaries will hold the interests in the real estate for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, engage in the business of acquiring and owning real estate, and make occasional sales as are consistent with our investment objectives. We do not intend to engage in prohibited transactions. We cannot assure you, however, that we will only make sales that satisfy the requirements of the safe harbors or that the IRS will not successfully assert that one or more of such sales are prohibited transactions. The 100% tax will not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held through a taxable REIT subsidiary or other taxable corporation, although such income will be subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular U.S. federal income tax rates.

There is a risk of changes in the tax law applicable to real estate investment trusts. Because the IRS, the United States Treasury Department and Congress frequently review federal income tax legislation, we cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted. Any of such legislative actions may prospectively or retroactively modify our tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of us and/or our investors.

The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the TCJA, as amended by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or the CARES Act, has significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their shareholders. Changes made by the TCJA and the CARES Act that could affect us and our shareholders include:

temporarily reducing individual U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income; the highest individual U.S. federal income tax rate has been reduced from 39.6% to 37% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
permanently eliminating the progressive corporate tax rate structure, with a maximum corporate tax rate of 35%, and replacing it with a flat corporate tax rate of 21%;
permitting a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received by our shareholders from us that are not designated by us as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, which will generally allow individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct up to 20% of such amounts for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
reducing the highest rate of withholding with respect to our distributions to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests from 35% to 21%;
limiting our deduction for net operating losses to 80% of REIT taxable income (prior to the application of the dividends paid deduction); for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020;
generally limiting the deduction for net business interest expense in excess of a specified percentage (50% for taxable years beginning in 2019 and 2020 and 30% for subsequent taxable years) of a business’s adjusted taxable income except for taxpayers that engage in certain real estate businesses and elect out of this rule (provided that such electing taxpayers must use an alternative depreciation system for certain property); and
eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax.

1315
Table of Contents

You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory, judicial or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our securities.

To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with certain highly technical and complex requirements.We cannot be certain we have complied, and will always be able to comply, with the requirements to qualify as a REIT because there are few judicial and administrative interpretations of these provisions. In addition, facts and circumstances that may be beyond our control may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. We cannot assure you that new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not change the tax laws significantly with respect to our qualification as a REIT or with respect to the federal income tax consequences of qualification. We believe that we have qualified as a REIT since our inception and intend to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, we cannot assure you that we are qualified or will remain qualified.

We may be unable to comply with the strict income distribution requirement applicable to REITs.As noted above, to maintain qualification as a REIT under the Code, a REIT must annually distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, excluding the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains. This requirement limits our ability to accumulate capital. We may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the 90% distribution requirements. Difficulties in meeting the 90% distribution requirement might arise due to competing demands for our funds or to timing differences between tax reporting and cash receipts and disbursements, because income may have to be reported before cash is received, because expenses may have to be paid before a deduction is allowed, because deductions may be disallowed or limited or because the IRS may make a determination that adjusts reported income. In those situations, we might be required to borrow funds or sell properties on adverse terms in order to meet the 90% distribution requirement and interest and penalties could apply which could adversely affect our financial condition. If we fail to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, we would cease to be taxed as a REIT.

Notwithstanding our status as a REIT, we are subject to various federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.For example, we will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains; provided, however, that properly designated undistributed capital gains will effectively avoid taxation at the shareholder level. We may be subject to other federal income taxes and may also have to pay some state income or franchise taxes because not all states treat REITs in the same manner as they are treated for federal income tax purposes. In addition, any taxable REIT subsidiary that we may form will be subject to regular corporate federal, state and local taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distributions to stockholders.

Other Risks

We may not be able to access adequate cash to fund our business.Our business requires access to adequate cash to finance our operations, distributions, capital expenditures, debt service obligations, development and redevelopment costs and property acquisition costs, if any. We expect to generate the cash to be used for these purposes primarily with operating cash flow, borrowings under secured and unsecured term loans, proceeds from sales of strategically identified assets and, when market conditions permit, through the issuance of debt and equity securities from time to time. We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to fund our business, particularly if we are unable to renew or extend leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire according to expectations.

We are dependent on key personnel.Our executive and other senior officers have a significant role in our success. Our ability to retain our management group or to attract suitable replacements should any members of the management group leave is dependent on the competitive nature of the employment market. The loss of services from key members of the management group or a limitation in their availability could adversely affect our financial condition and cash flow. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the capital markets.

We may amend our business policies without shareholder approval.Our Board of Directors determines our growth, investment, financing, capitalization, borrowing, operations and distributions policies. In addition, our charter provides that our Board of Directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. Although our Board of Directors has no present intention to amend or reverse any of these policies, they may be amended or revised without notice to shareholders. Accordingly, shareholders may not have control over changes in our policies. We cannot assure you that changes in our policies will serve fully the interests of all shareholders.

1416
Table of Contents

The market value of our preferred and common stock could decrease based on our performance and market perception and conditions.The market value of our preferred and common stock may be based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and current and future cash dividends, and may be secondarily based upon the real estate market value of our underlying assets. The market price of our preferred and common stock is influenced by their respective distributions relative to market interest rates. Rising interest rates may lead potential buyers of our stock to expect a higher distribution rate, which could adversely affect the market price of our stock. In addition, rising interest rates could result in increased expense, thereby adversely affecting cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and pay distributions.

There are restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our capital stock.To maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned, actually or by attribution, by five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code to also include certain entities, during the last half of a taxable year. Accordingly, our charter contains provisions restricting the ownership and transfer of our capital stock. These restrictions may discourage a tender offer or other transaction, or a change in management or of control of us that might involve a premium price for our common stock or preferred stock or that our shareholders otherwise believe to be in their best interests, and may result in the transfer of shares acquired in excess of the restrictions to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and, as a result, the forfeiture by the acquirer of the benefits of owning the additional shares.

Our earnings are dependent, in part, upon the performance of our investment portfolio.As permitted by the Code, we opportunistically invest in and own marketable securities of other REITs, which we generallyREITs. We intend to limit the size of this portfolio to no more than approximately 10%5% of our undepreciated assets, (which is ourwhich we define as total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).depreciation. We continue to believe that our REIT securities portfolio provides us with diversification, income, a source of potential liquidity when needed and also serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available in the private real estate markets. Our decision to reduce this threshold mainly stems from the implementation of accounting rule ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which took effect at the beginning of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2019. This rule requires that quarterly changes in the market value of our marketable securities flow through our Consolidated Statements of Income. The implementation of this accounting rule has resulted in increased volatility in our reported earnings and some of our key performance metrics. To the extent that the fair value of those investments declinesdecline or those investments do not provide an attractive return, our earnings and cash flow could be adversely affected. BeginningAs mentioned above, beginning with our fiscal year endingended September 30, 2019, all changes in the fair value of the equity securities of other REITs that we own, whether realized or unrealized, will bewere recognized as gains or losses in our consolidated statement of income. As a result, fluctuations in the fair value of those investments will in the future, impact our earnings even if we have not sold the underlying investments.

17
Table of Contents

We areIf our proposed merger with ILPT is not consummated, we will remain subject to restrictions that may impede our ability to effect a future change in control.Certain provisions contained in our charter and bylaws and certain provisions of Maryland law may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us and thereby inhibit a change in control. These provisions include the following:

Our charter provides for three classes of directors with the term of office of one class expiring each year, commonly referred to as a “staggered board.” By preventing common shareholders from voting on the election of more than one class of directors at any annual meeting of shareholders, this provision may have the effect of keeping the current members of our Board of Directors in control for a longer period of time than shareholders may desire.

Our charter generally limits any stockholder from acquiring more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding equity stock (defined as all of our classes of capital stock, except our excess stock). While this provision is intended to assist us in qualifying as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the ownership limit may also limit the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their shares of common stock that might otherwise exist if an investor was attempting to assemble a block of shares in excess of 9.8% of the outstanding shares of equity stock or otherwise effectaffect a change in control.
The request of shareholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at such meeting is necessary for shareholders to call a special meeting. We also require advance notice from shareholders for the nomination of directors or proposals of business to be considered at a meeting of shareholders.

15
Table of Contents

Our Board of Directors may authorize and cause us to issue securities without shareholder approval. Under our charter, our Board of Directors has the power to classify and reclassify any of our unissued shares of capital stock into shares of capital stock with such preferences, rights, powers and restrictions as the Board of Directors may determine.
“Business combination” provisions that provide that, unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not engage in certain business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of 10 percent or more of its assets, certain issuances of shares of stock and other specified transactions, with an “interested shareholder” or an affiliate of an interested shareholder for five years after the most recent date on which the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder, and thereafter unless specified criteria are met. An interested shareholder is defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof or an affiliate or associate of ours who was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting stock at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question. In our charter, we have expressly elected that the Maryland Business Combination Act not govern or apply to any transaction with a related company, UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH), a Maryland corporation.
The duties of directors of a Maryland corporation do not require them to, among other things (a) accept, recommend or respond to any proposal by a person seeking to acquire control of the corporation, (b) authorize the corporation to redeem any rights under, or modify or render inapplicable, any shareholders rights plan, (c) make a determination under the Maryland Business Combination Act or the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act to exempt any person or transaction from the requirements of those provisions, or (d) act or fail to act solely because of the effect of the act or failure to act may have on an acquisition or potential acquisition of control of the corporation or the amount or type of consideration that may be offered or paid to the shareholders in an acquisition.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to pay distributions regularly.Our ability to pay distributions in the future is dependent on our ability to operate profitably and to generate cash from our operations and the operations of our subsidiaries and is subject to limitations under our financing arrangements and Maryland law. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law, or the MGCL, a Maryland corporation generally may not make a distribution if, after giving effect to the distribution, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as the debts became due in the usual course of business, or the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus, unless the charter permits otherwise, the amount that would be needed if the corporation were to be dissolved at the time of the distribution to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferential rights on dissolution are superior to those receiving the distribution. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to pay distributions on a regular quarterly basis in the future.

Dividends on our capital stock do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends. Income from “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates are generally subject to tax at preferential rates. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Although these rules do not adversely affect our taxation or the dividends payable by us, to the extent that the preferential rates continue to apply to regular corporate qualified dividends, investors who are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive an investment in us to be relatively less attractive than an investment in the stock of a non-REIT corporation that pays dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of, and per share trading price of, our capital stock. It should be noted that the TCJA provides for a deduction from income for individuals, trusts and estates up to 20% of certain REIT dividends, which reduces the effective tax rate on such dividends below the effective tax rate on interest, though the deduction is generally not as favorable as the preferential rate on qualified dividends. The deduction for certain REIT dividends, unlike the favorable rate for qualified dividends, expires for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.

18
Table of Contents

General Risk Factors

Coverage under our existing insurance policies may be inadequate to cover losses. Weather conditions and natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, droughts, fires and other environmental conditions can harm our business operations. We generally maintain insurance policies related to our business, including casualty, general liability and other policies, covering our business operations, employees and assets. However, we would be required to bear all losses that are not adequately covered by insurance. In addition, there are certain losses that are not generally insured because it is not economically feasible to insure against them, including losses due to riots or acts of war. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits were to occur with respect to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the properties and, in the case of debt, which is with recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Although we believe that our insurance programs are adequate, we cannot assure you that we will not incur losses in excess of our insurance coverage, or that we will be able to obtain insurance in the future at acceptable levels and reasonable costs.

Future terrorist attacks and military conflicts could have a material adverse effect on general economic conditions, consumer confidence and market liquidity.Among other things, it is possible that interest rates may be affected by these events. An increase in interest rates may increase our costs of borrowing, leading to a reduction in our earnings. Terrorist acts could also result in significant damages to, or loss of, our properties. We and our tenants may be unable to obtain adequate insurance coverage on acceptable economic terms for losses resulting from acts of terrorism. Our lenders may require that we carry terrorism insurance even if we do not believe this insurance is necessary or cost effective. We may also be prohibited under the applicable lease from passing all or a portion of the cost of such insurance through to the tenant. Should an act of terrorism result in an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose capital invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from a property, while remaining obligated for any mortgage indebtedness or other financial obligations related to the property. Any loss of these types could adversely affect our financial condition.

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on us and the market price of our capital stock.Over the last several years, the United States stock and credit markets have experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions, which have caused market prices of many stocks and debt securities to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective debt financing to widen considerably. Continued uncertainty in the stock and credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access additional financing at reasonable terms, which may negatively affect our ability to acquire properties and otherwise pursue our investment strategy. A prolonged downturn in the stock or credit markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our investment strategy accordingly. These types of events in the stock and credit markets may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of the common stock, preferred stock or debt securities. The potential disruptions in the financial markets may have a material adverse effect on the market value of the common stock and preferred stock and the return we receive on our properties and investments, as well as other unknown adverse effects on us or the economy in general.

We are subject to risks arising from litigationlitigation..We may become involved in litigation. Litigation can be costly, and the results of litigation are often difficult to predict. We may not have adequate insurance coverage or contractual protection to cover costs and liability in the event we are sued, and to the extent we resort to litigation to enforce our rights, we may incur significant costs and ultimately be unsuccessful or unable to recover amounts we believe are owed to us. We may have little or no control of the timing of litigation, which presents challenges to our strategic planning.

DividendsWe are subject to risks relating to cybersecurity. An information security or operational technology incident, including a cybersecurity breach, could have a material adverse impact on our capital stock do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.Income from “qualified dividends” payablebusiness or reputation. As part of our regular review of potential risks, we have an Information Technology (“IT”) Manager who works with our IT service providers to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trustsidentify and estates are generally subjectmitigate any such risks. We have established a Cybersecurity Subcommittee of our Board’s Audit Committee to tax at preferential rates. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Although these rules do not adversely affect our taxation or the dividends payable by us,review and provide high level guidance on cybersecurity related issues of importance to the extent thatCompany. We purchase cyber liability insurance in amounts deemed reasonable by our insurance advisors.

We face various risks and uncertainties related to public health crises, including the preferential ratesrecent and ongoing global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). The COVID-19 Pandemic and its impacts are uncertain and hard to measure, but may have a material adverse effect on us. We face various risks and uncertainties related to public health crises, including ongoing global COVID-19 Pandemic, which has disrupted financial markets and significantly impacted worldwide economic activity to date and is likely to continue to applydo so. The future effects of the evolving impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic as well as mandatory and voluntary actions taken to regular corporate qualified dividends, investors whomitigate the public health impact of the Pandemic may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. The COVID-19 Pandemic and social and governmental responses to the Pandemic have caused, and are individuals, trustslikely to continue to cause, severe economic, market and estatesother disruptions worldwide. Although the COVID-19 Pandemic and related societal and government responses have not, to date, had a material impact on our business or financial results, the extent to which COVID-19 and related actions may, perceive an investment in us to be relatively less attractive than an investment in the stockfuture, impact our operations cannot be predicted with any degree of confidence. As a non-REIT corporation that pays dividends, which could materially and adversely affectresult, we cannot at this time predict the valueimpact of the sharesCOVID-19 Pandemic, but it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and per share trading price of, our capital stock.prospects.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

1619
Table of Contents

ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES

We operate as a REIT. Our portfolio is primarily comprised of real estate holdings, some of which have been long-term holdings carried on our financial statements at depreciated cost. We believe that their current market values exceed both the original cost and the depreciated cost.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our real estate investments as of September 30, 2018:2021:

    Mortgage         Mortgage 
  Fiscal Year  Square Balance         Balance 
State City (MSA) Acquisition Type Footage  9/30/2018  City (MSA, if applicable) (Tenant) Fiscal Year Acquisition Type Square Footage  

9/30/2021

(in thousands)

 
AL Huntsville 2005 Industrial  88,653  $370,903  Huntsville (FDX Ground) 2005 Industrial  88,890  $-0- 
AL Mobile 2018 Industrial  362,942   18,832,395  Mobile (Amazon) 2018 Industrial  362,942   15,609 
AZ Tolleson (Phoenix) 2003 Industrial  283,358   3,719,709  Tolleson (Phoenix) (Coca-Cola) 2003 Industrial  288,045   1,103 
CO Colorado Springs 2016 Industrial  225,362   16,651,710  Colorado Springs (FDX Ground) 2016 Industrial  225,362   13,469 
CO Denver 2005 Industrial  69,865   414,049  Denver (FDX Ground) 2005 Industrial  69,865   -0- 
CT Newington (Hartford) 2001 Industrial  54,812   -0-  Newington (Hartford) (Hartford HealthCare) 2001 Industrial  54,812   -0- 
FL Cocoa 2008 Industrial  144,138   -0-  Cocoa (FDX Ground) 2008 Industrial  144,138   -0- 
FL Davenport (Orlando) 2016 Industrial  310,922   23,702,918  Davenport (Orlando) (FDX Ground) 2016 Industrial  310,922   19,243 
FL Daytona Beach 2018 Industrial  399,440   19,187,819  Daytona Beach (B. Braun) 2018 Industrial  399,440   16,170 
FL Ft. Myers 2017 Industrial  213,672   13,280,803  Ft. Myers (FDX Ground) 2017 Industrial  213,672   10,873 
FL Homestead (Miami) 2017 Industrial  237,756   23,313,676  Homestead (Miami) (FDX Ground) 2017 Industrial  237,756   19,193 
FL Jacksonville (FDX) 1999 Industrial  95,883   -0-  Jacksonville (FDX) 1999 Industrial  95,883   -0- 
FL Jacksonville (FDX Ground) 2015 Industrial  297,579   16,243,754  Jacksonville (FDX Ground) 2015 Industrial  304,859   12,587 
FL Lakeland 2006 Industrial  32,105   -0-  Lakeland (FDX) 2007 Industrial  32,105   -0- 
FL Orlando 2008 Industrial  110,638   -0-  Orlando (FDX) 2008 Industrial  110,621   -0- 
FL Punta Gorda 2007 Industrial  34,624   -0-  Punta Gorda (FDX) 2007 Industrial  34,624   -0- 
FL Tampa (FDX Ground) 2004 Industrial  170,779   5,144,319  Tampa (FDX Ground) 2004 Industrial  174,975   -0- 
FL Tampa (FDX) 2006 Industrial  95,662   -0-  Tampa (FDX) 2006 Industrial  95,662   -0- 
FL Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) 2005 Industrial  68,385   -0-  Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) 2005 Industrial  68,385   -0- 
GA Augusta (FDX Ground) 2005 Industrial  59,358   338,789  Augusta (FDX Ground) 2005 Industrial  59,358   -0- 
GA Augusta (FDX) 2006 Industrial  30,184   -0-  Augusta (FDX) 2007 Industrial  30,184   -0- 
GA Braselton (Atlanta) 2018 Industrial  373,750   39,700,000  Braselton (Atlanta) (FDX Ground) 2018 Industrial  373,750   33,730 
GA Griffin (Atlanta) 2006 Industrial  218,120   -0-  Griffin (Atlanta) (Rinnai) 2006 Industrial  218,120   -0- 
GA Savannah 2018 Industrial  831,764   32,215,696  Locust Grove (Atlanta) (Home Depot) 2021 Industrial  657,518   55,307 
GA Savannah (Shaw) 2018 Industrial  831,764   26,273 
GA Savannah (FDX Ground) 2019 Industrial  126,520   15,091 
IA Urbandale (Des Moines) 1994 Industrial  36,270   -0-  Urbandale (Des Moines) (Foundation Building Materials) 1994 Industrial  36,270   -0- 
IL Burr Ridge (Chicago) 1997 Industrial  12,500   -0-  Burr Ridge (Chicago) (Sherwin-Williams) 1998 Industrial  12,500   -0- 
IL Elgin (Chicago) 2002 Industrial  89,052   -0-  Elgin (Chicago) (Joseph T. Ryerson and Son) 2002 Industrial  89,123   -0- 
IL Granite City (St. Louis, MO) 2001 Industrial  184,800   -0-  Granite City (St. Louis, MO) (Anheuser-Busch) 2002 Industrial  184,800   -0- 
IL Montgomery (Chicago) 2004 Industrial  171,200   -0-  Montgomery (Chicago) (Home Depot) 2005 Industrial  171,230   -0- 
IL Rockford (Collins Aerospace Systems) 2015 Industrial  38,833   -0-  Rockford (Raytheon Technologies Corporation) 2015 Industrial  38,833   -0- 
IL Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Co.) 2011 Industrial  66,387   -0-  Rockford (Sherwin-Williams) 2011 Industrial  66,387   -0- 
IL Sauget (St. Louis, MO) 2015 Industrial  198,773   8,563,797  Sauget (St. Louis, MO) (FDX Ground) 2015 Industrial  198,729   6,659 
IL Schaumburg (Chicago) 1997 Industrial  73,500   -0-  Schaumburg (Chicago) (FDX) 1997 Industrial  73,500   -0- 
IL Wheeling (Chicago) 2003 Industrial  123,000   -0-  Wheeling (Chicago) (FDX Ground) 2003 Industrial  123,000   -0- 
IN Greenwood (Indianapolis) (ULTA) 2015 Industrial  671,354   15,855 
IN Indianapolis (FDX Ground) 2014 Industrial  327,822   7,366 
IN Greenwood (Indianapolis) 2015 Industrial  671,354   20,159,025  Greenwood (Indianapolis) (Amazon) 2020 Industrial  615,747   48,802 
IN Indianapolis 2014 Industrial  327,822   10,437,151  Lafayette (Toyota) 2019 Industrial  350,418   15,234 
KS Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlisle Tire) 2003 Industrial  179,280   -0-  Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlstar Group) 2003 Industrial  179,280   -0- 
KS Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) 2014 Industrial  280,000   9,189,343  Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) 2014 Industrial  280,019   6,804 
KS Olathe (Kansas City) 2016 Industrial  313,763   19,956,867  Olathe (Kansas City) (FDX Ground) 2016 Industrial  313,763   16,217 
KS Topeka 2009 Industrial  40,000   860,364  Topeka (Coca-Cola) 2009 Industrial  40,000   -0- 
KY Buckner (Louisville) 2014 Industrial  558,600   15,305,669  Buckner (Louisville) (Treehouse) 2014 Industrial  558,509   12,993 
KY Frankfort (Lexington) 2015 Industrial  599,840   16,639,132  Frankfort (Lexington) (Jim Beam) 2015 Industrial  599,840   13,483 
KY Louisville 2016 Industrial  137,500   6,525,135  Louisville (Snap-on) 2016 Industrial  137,500   5,267 
LA Covington (New Orleans) 2016 Industrial  175,315   11,133,990  Covington (New Orleans) (FDX Ground) 2016 Industrial  175,315   8,917 
MD Beltsville (Washington, DC) 2001 Industrial  148,881   -0-  Beltsville (Washington, DC) (FDX Ground) 2001 Industrial  148,881   -0- 
MI Livonia (Detroit) 2013 Industrial  172,005   6,294,503  Livonia (Detroit) (FDX Ground) 2013 Industrial  172,668   4,267 
MI Orion 2007 Industrial  245,633   -0-  Orion (FDX Ground) 2007 Industrial  245,633   -0- 
MI Romulus (Detroit) 1998 Industrial  71,933   -0-  Romulus (Detroit) (FDX) 1998 Industrial  71,933   -0- 
MI Walker (Grand Rapids) 2017 Industrial  343,483   19,468,554  Walker (Grand Rapids) (FDX Ground) 2017 Industrial  343,483   16,027 
MN Stewartville (Rochester) (1) 2013 Industrial  60,398   2,115,962  Stewartville (Rochester) (FDX Ground) (1) 2013 Industrial  60,370   1,292 
MO Kansas City 2015 Industrial  158,417   6,633,001  Kansas City (Bunzl) 2015 Industrial  158,417   -0- 
MO Liberty (Kansas City) 1998 Industrial  95,898   -0-  Liberty (Kansas City) (Dakota Bodies) 1998 Industrial  96,687   -0- 
MO O’Fallon (St. Louis) 1994 Industrial  102,135   -0-  O’Fallon (St. Louis) (Pittsburgh Glass Works) 1995 Industrial  102,135   -0- 
MO St. Joseph (Woodstream/Altec) 2001 Industrial  382,880   -0- 
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Anda) 2012 Industrial  234,660   5,558 
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool) 2013 Industrial  861,889   16,095 

1720
Table of Contents

           

Mortgage

Balance

 
State City (MSA) Fiscal Year Acquisition Type Square Footage  

9/30/2021

(in thousands)

 
MS Richland (Jackson) (FDX) 1994 Industrial  36,000  $-0- 
MS Ridgeland (Jackson) (Graybar) 1993 Industrial  26,340   -0- 
NC Concord (Charlotte) (FDX Ground) 2016 Industrial  330,717   14,197 
NC Concord (Charlotte) (FDX Ground II) 2017 Industrial  354,482   20,587 
NC Fayetteville (Victory Packaging) 1997 Industrial  148,000   -0- 
NC Whitsett (Greensboro) (FDX Ground) 2020 Industrial  286,281   28,277 
NC Winston-Salem (Style Crest) 2002 Industrial  106,507   -0- 
NE Omaha (FDX) 1999 Industrial  89,115   -0- 
NJ Somerset (Various Tenants) (2) 1970 Shopping Center  64,220   -0- 
NJ Trenton (FDX Ground) 2019 Industrial  347,145   47,039 
NY Cheektowaga (Buffalo) (Sonwil) 2007 Industrial  104,981   -0- 
NY Halfmoon (Albany) (UPS) 2012 Industrial  75,000   -0- 
NY Hamburg (Buffalo) (FDX Ground) 2017 Industrial  338,584   17,411 
OH Bedford Heights (Cleveland) (FDX) 2007 Industrial  82,269   -0- 
OH Cincinnati (Keurig Dr Pepper) 2015 Industrial  63,840   -0- 
OH Lancaster (Columbus) (Magna) 2020 Industrial  152,995   8,311 
OH Kenton (International Paper) 2017 Industrial  298,472   9,592 
OH Lebanon (Cincinnati) (Siemens Real Estate) 2012 Industrial  51,130   -0- 
OH Monroe (Cincinnati) (UGN) 2015 Industrial  387,000   11,453 
OH Plain City (Columbus) (FDX Ground) 2021 Industrial  500,268   45,322 
OH Richfield (Cleveland) (FDX Ground) 2006 Industrial  131,152   -0- 
OH Stow (Cooper Tire) 2017 Industrial  219,765   10,106 
OH Streetsboro (Cleveland) (Best Buy) 2012 Industrial  368,060   7,332 
OH West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) (FDX Ground) 2000 Industrial  103,818   -0- 
OK Oklahoma City (Amazon) 2018 Industrial  300,000   16,501 
OK Oklahoma City (Amazon II) 2020 Industrial  120,780   9,272 
OK Oklahoma City (Bunzl) 2017 Industrial  110,361   4,243 
OK Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) 2012 Industrial  158,340   1,767 
OK Tulsa (Keurig Dr Pepper) 2014 Industrial  46,240   1,267 
PA Altoona (FDX Ground) (1) 2014 Industrial  122,522   1,987 
PA Imperial (Pittsburgh) (GE) 2016 Industrial  125,860   8,734 
PA Monaca (Pittsburgh) (NF&M) 1973 Industrial  255,658   -0- 
SC Aiken (Augusta, GA) (Autoneum) 2017 Industrial  315,560   12,003 
SC Charleston (FDX) 2018 Industrial  121,683   11,444 
SC Charleston (FDX Ground) 2018 Industrial  265,318   25,171 
SC Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) (FDX Ground) 2010 Industrial  176,939   -0- 
SC Hanahan (Charleston) (SAIC) 2005 Industrial  302,400   -0- 
SC Hanahan (Charleston) (Amazon) 2005 Industrial  91,776   -0- 
TN Chattanooga (FDX) 2007 Industrial  60,637   -0- 
TN Kodak (Knoxville) (FDX Ground) 2021 Industrial  259,053   -0- 
TN Lebanon (Nashville) (Cracker Barrel) 2011 Industrial  381,240   -0- 
TN Memphis (FDX Trade Networks) 2010 Industrial  449,900   2,364 
TN Shelby County (Land) 2007 Land  N/A   -0- 
TX Carrollton (Dallas) (Carrier Global Corporation) 2010 Industrial  184,317   3,781 
TX Corpus Christi (FDX Ground) 2012 Industrial  46,253   -0- 
TX Edinburg (FDX Ground) 2011 Industrial  164,207   -0- 
TX El Paso (FDX Ground) 2007 Industrial  144,199   -0- 
TX Ft. Worth (Dallas) (FDX Ground) 2015 Industrial  312,923   16,364 
TX Houston (National Oilwell) 2010 Industrial  91,295   -0- 
TX Lindale (Tyler) (FDX Ground) 2015 Industrial  163,383   4,393 
TX Mesquite (Dallas) (FDX Ground) 2017 Industrial  351,874   25,461 
TX Spring (Houston) (FDX Ground) 2014 Industrial  181,176   5,931 
TX Waco (FDX Ground) 2012 Industrial  150,710   3,280 
UT Ogden (Salt Lake City) (FDX) 2020 Industrial  69,734   7,805 
VA Charlottesville (FDX) 1999 Industrial  48,064   -0- 
VA Mechanicsville (Richmond) (FDX) 2001 Industrial  112,799   -0- 
VA Richmond (Locke Supply) 2004 Industrial  60,000   -0- 
VA Roanoke (CHEP USA) 2007 Industrial  83,000   -0- 
VA Roanoke (FDX Ground) 2013 Industrial  103,580   2,866 
VT Burlington (FDX Ground) 2021 Industrial  143,972   -0- 
WA Burlington (Seattle/Everett) (FDX Ground) 2016 Industrial  210,445   14,264 
WI Cudahy (Milwaukee) (FDX Ground) 2001 Industrial  139,564   -0- 
WI Green Bay (FDX Ground) (1) 2014 Industrial  99,102   1,613 
         24,924,752  $839,622 

   Fiscal Year   Square  Mortgage
Balance
 
State City (MSA) Acquisition Type Footage  9/30/2018 
MO St. Joseph 2001 Industrial  382,880  $-0- 
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) 2012 Industrial  234,660   7,564,186 
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool) 2013 Industrial  861,889   21,722,567 
MS Richland (Jackson) 1994 Industrial  36,000   -0- 
MS Ridgeland (Jackson) 1993 Industrial  26,340   -0- 
NC Concord (Charlotte) 2016 Industrial  330,717   17,813,451 
NC Concord (Charlotte) 2017 Industrial  354,482   24,863,355 
NC Fayetteville 1997 Industrial  148,000   -0- 
NC Winston-Salem 2002 Industrial  106,507   -0- 
NE Omaha 1999 Industrial  89,115   -0- 
NJ Carlstadt (New York, NY) (2) 2001 Industrial  60,400   1,580,181 
NJ Somerset (3) 1970 Shopping Center  64,220   -0- 
NY Cheektowaga (Buffalo) 2002 Industrial  104,981   -0- 
NY Halfmoon (Albany) 2012 Industrial  75,000   -0- 
NY Hamburg (Buffalo) 2017 Industrial  338,584   21,328,714 
OH Bedford Heights (Cleveland) 2007 Industrial  82,269   -0- 
OH Cincinnati 2015 Industrial  63,840   -0- 
OH Kenton 2017 Industrial  298,472   11,473,387 
OH Lebanon (Cincinnati) 2012 Industrial  51,130   -0- 
OH Monroe (Cincinnati) 2015 Industrial  232,200   7,126,384 
OH Richfield (Cleveland) 2006 Industrial  131,152   -0- 
OH Stow 2017 Industrial  219,765   12,130,343 
OH Streetsboro (Cleveland) 2012 Industrial  368,060   9,300,481 
OH West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) 2000 Industrial  103,818   -0- 
OK Oklahoma City (Amazon) 2018 Industrial  300,000   19,013,593 
OK Oklahoma City (Bunzl) 2017 Industrial  110,361   5,537,962 
OK Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) 2012 Industrial  158,340   3,416,097 
OK Tulsa 2014 Industrial  46,240   1,685,288 
PA Altoona (1) 2014 Industrial  122,522   3,253,281 
PA Imperial (Pittsburgh) 2016 Industrial  125,860   11,199,661 
PA Monaca (Pittsburgh) 1977 Industrial  255,658   -0- 
SC Aiken (Augusta, GA) 2017 Industrial  315,560   14,471,117 
SC Charleston (FDX) 2018 Industrial  121,683   13,683,131 
SC Charleston (FDX Ground) 2018 Industrial  265,318   29,860,000 
SC Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) 2010 Industrial  176,939   724,766 
SC Hanahan (Charleston) (SAIC) 2005 Industrial  302,400   -0- 
SC Hanahan (Charleston) (FDX Ground) 2005 Industrial  91,776   465,749 
TN Chattanooga 2007 Industrial  60,637   -0- 
TN Lebanon (Nashville) 2011 Industrial  381,240   7,217,469 
TN Memphis 2010 Industrial  449,900   5,061,376 
TN Shelby County 2007 Land  N/A   -0- 
TX Carrollton (Dallas) 2010 Industrial  184,317   6,455,552 
TX Corpus Christi 2012 Industrial  46,253   -0- 
TX Edinburg 2011 Industrial  164,207   -0- 
TX El Paso 2006 Industrial  144,149   -0- 
TX Ft. Worth (Dallas) 2015 Industrial  304,608   20,753,864 
TX Houston 2010 Industrial  91,295   2,148,201 
TX Lindale (Tyler) 2015 Industrial  163,378   5,638,258 
TX Mesquite (Dallas) 2017 Industrial  351,874   30,928,224 
TX Spring (Houston) 2014 Industrial  181,176   7,924,865 
TX Waco 2012 Industrial  150,710   4,234,777 
VA Charlottesville 1999 Industrial  48,064   -0- 
VA Mechanicsville (Richmond) 2001 Industrial  112,799   -0- 
VA Richmond 2004 Industrial  60,000   -0- 
VA Roanoke (CHEP USA) 2007 Industrial  83,000   -0- 
VA Roanoke (FDX Ground) 2013 Industrial  103,402   4,395,246 
WA Burlington (Seattle/Everett) 2016 Industrial  210,445   17,757,364 
WI Cudahy (Milwaukee) 2001 Industrial  139,564   -0- 
WI Green Bay (1) 2013 Industrial  99,102   2,640,432 
         21,173,581  $719,768,355 

 (1)One loan is secured by the properties located in Green Bay, WI, Stewartville, MN and Altoona, PA.
(2)We own a 51% controlling equity interest.
(3)We own a 67% controlling equity interest.

1821
Table of Contents

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the principal tenants and leases for our properties shown above as of September 30, 2018:2021:

State City (MSA) Tenant Annualized Rent  Lease Expiration   City (MSA) Tenant 

Annualized Rent

(in thousands)

  Lease Expiration  
AL Huntsville FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. $605,000  07/31/26   Huntsville FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. $605  07/31/26  
AL Mobile Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Amazon.com. Inc.)  2,020,000  11/30/28   Mobile Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)  2,065  11/30/28  
AZ Tolleson (Phoenix) Western Container Corp. (Coca-Cola)  1,361,000  04/30/27   Tolleson (Phoenix) Western Container Corp. (Coca-Cola)  1,409  04/30/27  
CO Colorado Springs FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,832,000  01/31/26   Colorado Springs FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,832  01/31/26  
CO Denver FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  605,000  10/31/25 (1) Denver FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  609  10/31/25  
CT Newington (Hartford) Kellogg Sales Company  329,000  02/29/20   Newington (Hartford) Hartford HealthCare Corporation  307  04/30/31  
FL Cocoa FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,112,000  09/30/24   Cocoa FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,112  09/30/24  
FL Davenport (Orlando) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,609,000  04/30/31   Davenport (Orlando) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,625  04/30/31  
FL Daytona Beach B. Braun Medical Inc.  2,130,000  04/01/28   Daytona Beach B. Braun Medical Inc.  2,330  02/28/33  
FL Ft. Myers FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,418,000  08/31/27   Ft. Myers FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,418  08/31/27  
FL Homestead (Miami) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,282,000  03/31/32   Homestead (Miami) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,282  03/31/32  
FL Jacksonville FedEx Corporation  533,000  05/31/29 (1) Jacksonville FedEx Corporation  536  05/31/29  
FL Jacksonville FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,998,000  12/31/29   Jacksonville FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,998  12/31/29  
FL Lakeland FedEx Corporation  155,000  11/30/27 (1) Lakeland FedEx Corporation  155  11/30/27  
FL Orlando FedEx Corporation  666,000  11/30/27 (1) Orlando FedEx Corporation  666  11/30/27  
FL Punta Gorda FedEx Corporation  284,000  06/30/27   Punta Gorda FedEx Corporation  284  06/30/27  
FL Tampa FedEx Corporation  603,000  11/30/27   Tampa FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,624  07/31/26  
FL Tampa FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,624,000  07/31/26   Tampa FedEx Corporation  603  11/30/27  
FL Tampa Tampa Bay Grand Prix  297,000  09/30/20   Tampa Tampa Bay Grand Prix  369  09/30/27  
GA Augusta FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  501,000  06/30/21 (1) Augusta FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  513  06/30/23 (1)
GA Augusta FedEx Corporation  121,000  11/30/22   Augusta FedEx Corporation  121  11/30/22  
GA Braselton (Atlanta) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  3,801,000  02/28/33   Braselton (Atlanta) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  3,801  02/28/33  
GA Griffin (Atlanta) Rinnai America Corporation  831,000  12/31/20   Griffin (Atlanta) Rinnai America Corporation  913  12/31/22 (1)
GA Savannah Shaw Industries, Inc.  3,551,000  09/30/27   Locust Grove (Atlanta) Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.  5,458  11/30/40  
GA Savannah Shaw Industries, Inc.  3,563  09/30/27  
GA Savannah FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,765  10/31/28  
IA Urbandale (Des Moines) Foundation Building Materials, LLC  172,000  12/31/27 (2) Urbandale (Des Moines) Foundation Building Materials, LLC  179  12/31/27 (2)
IL Burr Ridge (Chicago) Sherwin-Williams Company  162,000  10/31/21   Burr Ridge (Chicago) Sherwin-Williams Company  162  10/31/26 (1)
IL Elgin (Chicago) Joseph T. Ryerson and Son, Inc.  506,000  01/31/20   Elgin (Chicago) Joseph T. Ryerson and Son, Inc.  519  01/31/25  
IL Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Anheuser-Busch, Inc.  821,000  11/30/21   Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Anheuser-Busch, Inc.  954  03/31/22 (3)
IL Montgomery (Chicago) Home Depot USA, Inc.  997,000  06/30/20   Montgomery (Chicago) Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.  1,079  12/31/22  
IL Rockford Collins Aerospace Systems (United Technologies)  364,000  06/30/27 (3) Rockford Collins Aerospace Systems (Raytheon Technologies Corp)  368  06/30/27 (4)
IL Rockford Sherwin-Williams Company  481,000  12/31/23   Rockford Sherwin-Williams Company  486  12/31/23  
IL Sauget (St. Louis, MO) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,036,000  05/31/29   Sauget (St. Louis, MO) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,036  05/31/29  
IL Schaumburg (Chicago) FedEx Corporation  478,000  03/31/27   Schaumburg (Chicago) FedEx Corporation  478  03/31/27  
IL Wheeling (Chicago) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,272,000  05/31/27   Wheeling (Chicago) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,272  05/31/27  
IN Greenwood (Indianapolis) ULTA, Inc.  2,782  07/31/25  
IN Indianapolis FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,717  10/31/27  
IN Greenwood (Indianapolis) ULTA, Inc.  2,702,000  07/31/25   Greenwood (Indianapolis) Amazon.com.indc, LLC (Amazon.com, Inc.)  4,991  08/31/34  
IN Indianapolis FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,715,000  10/31/27   Lafayette Toyota Tsusho America, Inc.  1,722  06/30/29  
KS Edwardsville (Kansas City) Carlisle Tire & Wheel Company  739,000  07/31/23 (1) Edwardsville (Kansas City) Carlstar Group, LLC  771  07/31/23  
KS Edwardsville (Kansas City) International Paper Company  1,348,000  08/31/23   Edwardsville (Kansas City) International Paper Company  1,382  08/31/23  
KS Olathe (Kansas City) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,200,000  05/31/31   Olathe (Kansas City) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,553  05/31/31  
KS Topeka Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Co., LLC (Coca-Cola)  332,000  09/30/21   Topeka Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Co., LLC (Coca-Cola)  292  09/30/26 (1)
KY Buckner (Louisville) TreeHouse Private Brands, Inc.  2,206,000  10/31/33   Buckner (Louisville) TreeHouse Private Brands, Inc.  2,267  10/31/33  
KY Frankfort (Lexington) Jim Beam Brands Company (Beam Suntory)  2,051,000  01/31/25   Frankfort (Lexington) Jim Beam Brands Company (Beam Suntory)  2,112  01/31/25  
KY Louisville Challenger Lifts, Inc. (Snap-on Inc.)  838,000  06/07/26   Louisville Challenger Lifts, Inc. (Snap-on Inc.)  858  06/07/26  
LA Covington (New Orleans) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,262,000  06/30/25   Covington (New Orleans) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,274  06/30/25  
MD Beltsville (Washington, DC) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,452,000  07/31/28 (1) Beltsville (Washington, DC) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,455  07/31/28  
MI Livonia (Detroit) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,194,000  03/31/22   Livonia (Detroit) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,194  03/31/22  
MI Orion FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,908,000  06/30/23   Orion FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,908  06/30/23  
MI Romulus (Detroit) FedEx Corporation  370,000  05/31/21   Romulus (Detroit) FedEx Corporation  421  05/31/26 (1)
MI Walker (Grand Rapids) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,102,000  01/31/32   Walker (Grand Rapids) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,106  01/31/32  
MN Stewartville (Rochester) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  372,000  05/30/23   Stewartville (Rochester) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  372  05/31/23  
MO Kansas City Bunzl Distribution Midcentral, Inc.  752,000  09/30/21   Kansas City Bunzl Distribution Midcentral, Inc.  714  09/30/26 (1)
MO Liberty (Kansas City) Holland 1916 Inc.  349,000  06/30/19   Liberty (Kansas City) Dakota Bodies, LLC  416  04/30/26  
MO O’Fallon (St. Louis) Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC  442,000  06/30/21 (1) O’Fallon (St. Louis) Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, a Division of VITRO  508  06/30/26 (1)(5)
MO St. Joseph Woodstream Corporation  914,000  09/30/21 (4) St. Joseph Woodstream Corporation  987  09/30/26 (1)(6)
MO St. Joseph Altec Industries, Inc.  371,000  02/28/23 (1)(4) St. Joseph Altec Industries, Inc.  378  02/28/23 (6)
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  1,205,000  07/31/22   Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  1,220  07/31/22  
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation  3,098  07/31/28  
MS Richland (Jackson) FedEx Corporation  120  03/31/24  
MS Ridgeland (Jackson) Graybar Electric Company  122  07/31/25  
NC Concord (Charlotte) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,237  07/31/25  
NC Concord (Charlotte) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,537  05/31/32  
NC Fayetteville Victory Packaging, L.P.  504  02/28/25 (1)
NC Whitsett (Greensboro) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  3,002  04/30/35  
NC Winston-Salem Style Crest, Inc.  433  03/31/26 (1)
NE Omaha FedEx Corporation  446  10/31/23  
NJ Somerset Various Tenants at Retail Shopping Center  616  Various (7)

1922
Table of Contents

State City (MSA) Tenant Annualized Rent  Lease Expiration  
MS Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation $3,032,000  07/31/28  
MS Richland (Jackson) FedEx Corporation  120,000  03/31/24  
MS Ridgeland (Jackson) Graybar Electric Company  109,000  07/31/19 (5)
NC Concord (Charlotte) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,237,000  07/31/25  
NC Concord (Charlotte) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,537,000  05/31/32  
NC Fayetteville Victory Packaging, L.P.  502,000  02/28/21  
NC Winston-Salem Style Crest, Inc.  387,000  03/31/21  
NE Omaha FedEx Corporation  446,000  10/31/23  
NJ Carlstadt (New York, NY) SOFIVE, Inc.  558,000  01/31/25 (6)
NJ Somerset Various Tenants at Retail Shopping Center  807,000  Various (7)
NY Cheektowaga (Buffalo) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  966,000  08/31/19  
NY Halfmoon (Albany) RGH Enterprises, Inc. (Cardinal Health)  607,000  11/30/21  
NY Hamburg (Buffalo) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,313,000  03/31/31  
OH Bedford Heights (Cleveland) FedEx Corporation  436,000  08/31/28 (1)
OH Cincinnati The American Bottling Company (Keurig Dr Pepper)  481,000  09/30/29  
OH Kenton International Paper Company  1,244,000  08/31/27  
OH Lebanon (Cincinnati) Siemens Real Estate  464,000  04/30/24 (1)(8)
OH Monroe (Cincinnati) UGN, Inc.  1,070,000  02/28/30  
OH Richfield (Cleveland) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,493,000  09/30/24  
OH Stow Mickey Thompson (Cooper Tire)  1,501,000  08/31/27  
OH Streetsboro (Cleveland) Best Buy Warehousing Logistics, Inc.  1,676,000  01/31/22  
OH West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  543,000  08/31/23  
OK Oklahoma City Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Amazon.com. Inc.)  1,884,000  10/31/27  
OK Oklahoma City Bunzl Distribution Oklahoma, Inc.  722,000  08/31/24  
OK Oklahoma City FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,048,000  06/30/25  
OK Tulsa The American Bottling Company (Keurig Dr Pepper)  262,000  02/28/24  
PA Altoona FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  651,000  08/31/23  
PA Imperial (Pittsburgh) General Electric Company  1,321,000  12/31/25  
PA Monaca (Pittsburgh) NF&M International, Inc.  835,000  12/31/24  
SC Aiken (Augusta, GA) Autoneum North America, Inc.  1,703,000  04/30/32  
SC Charleston FedEx Corporation  1,315,000  08/31/32  
SC Charleston FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,713,000  06/30/33  
SC Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,581,000  08/31/28  
SC Hanahan (Charleston) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  675,000  11/30/18 (1)(9)
SC Hanahan (Charleston) Science Applications International Corporation  1,491,000  04/30/19  
TN Chattanooga FedEx Corporation  319,000  10/31/22 (1)
TN Lebanon (Nashville) CBOCS Distribution, Inc. (Cracker Barrel)  1,447,000  06/30/24  
TN Memphis FedEx Corporation  1,384,000  05/31/29 (8)
TN Shelby County N/A- Land  -0-  N/A  
TX Carrollton (Dallas) Carrier Enterprise, LLC (United Technologies)  1,241,000  01/31/24 (1)
TX Corpus Christi FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  436,000  08/31/21  
TX Edinburg FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,097,000  09/30/26  
TX El Paso FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,345,000  09/30/23  
TX Ft. Worth (Dallas) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,373,000  04/30/30  
TX Houston National Oilwell Varco, Inc.  754,000  09/30/22  
TX Lindale (Tyler) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  725,000  06/30/24  
TX Mesquite (Dallas) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  3,195,000  03/31/32  
TX Spring (Houston) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,581,000  09/30/24  
TX Waco FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,078,000  08/31/25  
VA Charlottesville FedEx Corporation  329,000  08/31/27  
VA Mechanicsville (Richmond) FedEx Corporation  541,000  04/30/23  
VA Richmond Carrier Enterprise, LLC (United Technologies)  324,000  11/30/18 (9)
VA Roanoke CHEP USA, Inc.  500,000  02/28/25 (10)
VA Roanoke FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  755,000  04/30/23  
WA Burlington (Seattle/Everett) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,962,000  08/31/30  
WI Cudahy (Milwaukee) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  827,000  06/30/27  
WI Green Bay FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  468,000  05/30/23  
      $126,792,000     

20
Table of Contents

State City (MSA) Tenant 

Annualized Rent

(in thousands)

  Lease Expiration 
NJ Trenton FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. $5,328  06/30/32  
NY Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Sonwil Distribution Center, Inc.  630  01/31/22 (8)
NY Halfmoon (Albany) United Parcel Service, Inc.  595  03/31/31 (9)
NY Hamburg (Buffalo) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,329  03/31/31  
OH Bedford Heights (Cleveland) FedEx Corporation  438  08/31/28  
OH Cincinnati The American Bottling Company (Keurig Dr Pepper)  488  09/30/29  
OH Lancaster (Columbus) Magna Seating of America, Inc.  1,201  01/31/30  
OH Kenton International Paper Company  1,281  08/31/27  
OH Lebanon (Cincinnati) Siemens Real Estate  464  04/30/24  
OH Monroe (Cincinnati) UGN, Inc.  2,107  02/28/34  
OH Plain City (Columbus) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  4,569  09/30/35  
OH Richfield (Cleveland) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,493  09/30/24  
OH Stow Mickey Thompson (Cooper Tire)  1,537  08/31/27  
OH Streetsboro (Cleveland) Best Buy Warehousing Logistics, Inc.  1,725  01/31/22  
OH West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  560  08/31/23  
OK Oklahoma City Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)  1,948  10/31/27  
OK Oklahoma City Amazon.com Services, LLC (Amazon.com, Inc.)  935  08/31/30  
OK Oklahoma City Bunzl Distribution Oklahoma, Inc.  743  08/31/24  
OK Oklahoma City FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,048  07/31/25  
OK Tulsa The American Bottling Company (Keurig Dr Pepper)  269  02/28/24  
PA Altoona FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  651  08/31/23  
PA Imperial (Pittsburgh) General Electric Company  1,329  12/31/30  
PA Monaca (Pittsburgh) NF&M International, Inc.  795  03/31/25  
SC Aiken (Augusta, GA) Autoneum North America, Inc.  1,746  04/30/32  
SC Charleston FedEx Corporation  1,314  08/31/32  
SC Charleston FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,713  06/30/33  
SC Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,598  08/31/28  
SC Hanahan (Charleston) Science Applications International Corporation  1,708  10/31/23  
SC Hanahan (Charleston) Amazon Services, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)  803  06/30/29  
TN Chattanooga FedEx Corporation  319  10/31/22  
TN Kodak (Knoxville) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,979  05/31/36  
TN Lebanon (Nashville) CBOCS Distribution, Inc. (Cracker Barrel)  1,490  06/30/24  
TN Memphis FedEx Trade Networks  1,394  05/31/29  
TN Shelby County N/A- Land  -0-  N/A  
TX Carrollton (Dallas) Carrier Enterprise, LLC (Carrier Global Corporation)  1,160  01/31/24  
TX Corpus Christi FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  454  08/31/26 (1)
TX Edinburg FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,097  09/30/26  
TX El Paso FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,345  09/30/23  
TX Ft. Worth (Dallas) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  2,394  04/30/30  
TX Houston National Oilwell Varco, Inc.  801  09/30/29 (1)
TX Lindale (Tyler) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  725  06/30/24  
TX Mesquite (Dallas) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  3,209  03/31/32  
TX Spring (Houston) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,581  09/30/24  
TX Waco FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,078  08/31/25  
UT Ogden (Salt Lake City) FedEx Corporation  772  03/31/35  
VA Charlottesville FedEx Corporation  329  08/31/27  
VA Mechanicsville (Richmond) FedEx Corporation  541  04/30/23  
VA Richmond Locke Supply Co.  340  04/30/32  
VA Roanoke CHEP USA, Inc.  509  02/28/25  
VA Roanoke FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  755  04/30/23  
VT Burlington FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  3,233  05/31/36  
WA Burlington (Seattle/Everett) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  1,962  08/31/30  
WI Cudahy (Milwaukee) FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  827  06/30/27  
WI Green Bay FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.  468  05/31/23  
      $164,118     

(1)ExtensionRenewal or extension has been executed. See fiscal 20182021 and fiscal 20192022 renewal and extension chart.
(2)The lease has a one-time early termination option which may be exercised on 12/31/25, on the condition that we are provided with six months’ notice and the tenant pays us a $95,000 termination fee.
(3)Lease was set to expire 11/30/21 and was renewed for four months through 3/31/22 at 150% of the prior rental rate.
(4)The lease has an early termination option which may be exercised after December 2025,6/30/22, on the condition that we are provided with six monthsmonths’ notice and the tenant pays us a $92,000$1.1 million termination fee.
(3)(5)LeaseThe lease has an early termination option which may be exercised after June 2022,6/30/24, on the condition that we are provided with six monthsmonths’ notice and the tenant pays us a $1,102,097$262,000 termination fee.
(4)(6)Property is leased to two tenants.
(5)(7)Lease has an early termination option which may be exercised if tenant gives six months notice at any time.
(6)Estimated annual rent is the full annual rent per the lease. We consolidate the results of this property due to our 51% controlling equity interest.
(7)We own a 67% controlling equity interest. Estimated annual rent reflects our proportionate share of the total rent.
(8)Not reflected in the table above. The current tenant is not renewing its lease. We have agreed toentered into a seven year lease agreement effective 2/1/22 with United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) for this space. The lease with UPS provides for initial annual rent of $683,000 with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a U.S. GAAP straight-line annualized rent of $725,000 over the renewal terms withlife of the tenantlease. This results in an increase in the average lease rate of 15.1% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the finalized signed lease is forthcoming.an increase of 8.3% on a cash basis.
(9)Tenant will not be renewing, property is currently being marketed.
(10)Lease has an earlyEffective 10/1/20, we entered into a lease termination optionagreement with RGH Enterprises, Inc. (Cardinal Health) for this 75,000 square foot facility, whereby we received a termination fee in the amount of $377,000 representing approximately 50% of the then remaining rent due under the lease. We simultaneously entered into 10.4 year lease agreement with UPS which may be exercisedbecame effective 11/1/20. The new lease agreement provided for five months of free rent, after August 2021, onwhich, initial annual rent was $510,000, with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of $541,000 over the condition that we are provided with six months notice andlife of the tenant pays us a $500,000 termination fee.lease which matures 3/31/31.

23
Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2018,2021, all improvedbut one of our industrial properties were 100% occupied, except for one property located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA consisting of 255,658 rentable square feet of which 68% or 174,802 square feet is occupied, resulting in a 99.6%99.7% overall occupancy percentage for our whole portfolio of properties.rate.

Our weighted-averageweighted average lease expiration was 8.17.0 years and 7.97.1 years as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. Our weighted average lease expiration has been 7.0 years or greater for over seven consecutive years.

Our averageoverall occupancy rates as of the years ended September 30, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016, 2015 and 2014 were 99.6%99.7%, 99.3%99.4%, 98.9%, 99.6%, 97.7% and 95.9%99.3%, respectively. The weighted average effective annualized rent per square foot for the years ended September 30, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016, 2015was $6.61, $6.36, $6.20, $6.01 and 2014 was $6.01, $5.93, $5.72, $5.48 and $5.51, respectively. Our overall occupancy rate has been 98.9% or above for over six consecutive years.

Completed expansions that have resulted in increased rents over the fiscal years ended September 30, 20172020 and 20182021

Ecommerce has been a major catalyst driving increased demand for the industrial property type. The shift from traditional brick and mortar retail shopping to ordering goods on-line has resulted in record occupancy rates for industrial real estate throughout the U.S. Due to thethis increased demand, for industrial space, we have been experiencing an increase in expansion activity at our existing properties.

On October 1, 2016,During fiscal 2021, we completed the first phase of a 50,625 square foottwo-phase parking expansion of the building leased toproject for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. at our property located in Edinburg, TXOlathe (Kansas City), KS. The first phase of this parking expansion project was completed for a total cost of $3.4 million, resulting in an initial increase in annual rent effective November 5, 2020 of approximately $340,000 from approximately $2.1 million, or $6.83 per square foot, to approximately $2.5 million, or $7.91 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent increased by 2.1% on June 1, 2021 and will continue to increase 2.1% every five years, resulting in an annualized rent from November 5, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of approximately $2.6 million, or $8.15 per square foot. We recently began construction on the second phase of this parking expansion project at this location, which upon completion will further increase the rental rate and extend the lease term.

In addition, effective June 4, 2021, we completed a parking lot expansion for UPS at our property located in Halfmoon (Albany), NY for a cost of approximately $4,762,000,$835,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 to September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an initial increase in annual rent effective fromon the date of completion of approximately $499,000$52,000 from approximately $598,000,$510,000, or $5.26$6.80 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000,$562,000, or $6.68$7.50 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will continue to increase each year by 2.0% resulting in an annualized rent from June 4, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of approximately $622,000, or $8.29 per square foot.

On September 1, 2017, aWe have several FedEx Ground parking expansion projects in progress with more under discussion. Currently there are nine parking expansion projects underway, which we expect to cost approximately $42.6 million. These parking expansion projects will enable us to capture additional rent while lengthening the terms of these leases. We are also in discussions to expand the parking at eight additional locations bringing the total recently completed and likely future parking lot expansion projects to 18 currently.

Due to the proliferation of ecommerce sales and last mile deliveries, it is important to take into account the large amounts of real estate utilized for trailer, van, and car parking at many of our properties in determining how our in-place rental rates compare to market rental rates for properties being used in a property leasedsimilar manner. Rents per square foot on properties that may be nearby, but have only limited acreage devoted to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Ft. Myers, FLparking, are poor comparisons as they cannot accommodate the same tenant needs.

Fiscal 2021 Renewals

In fiscal 2021, approximately 5% of our gross leasable area, representing ten leases totaling 1.2 million square feet, was completed for a costset to expire. All ten of approximately $862,000,these leases have been renewed, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2026 to August 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in100% retention rate for a weighted average term of 4.2 years, at a rental rate increase of 6.2% on a U.S. GAAP basis and an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $53,000 from approximately $1,365,000, or $6.39 per square foot to approximately $1,418,000, or $6.64 per square foot.0.4% on a cash basis.

On November 1, 2017, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Indianapolis, IN was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,683,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from April 2024 to October 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $184,000 from approximately $1,533,000, or $4.67 per square foot, to approximately $1,715,000, or $5.23 per square foot.

On September 27, 2018, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Ft. Mill, SC was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,834,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from October 2023 to August 2028. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $183,000 from approximately $1,415,000, or $8.00 per square foot, to approximately $1,598,000, or $9.03 per square foot.

2124
Table of Contents

Fiscal 2018 Renewals

In fiscal 2018, approximately 8% of our gross leasable area, representing 16 leases totaling 1,546,637 square feet, was set to expire. We have renewed 11incurred or we expect to incur leasing commission costs of the 16 leases that were set to expire during fiscal 2018, representing 1,063,824 square feet, or 69%$621,000 in connection with six of the expiring square footage. One of the 11 leases, which is with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., for a property located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC, renewed for only four months, until November 30, 2018, because the tenant moved their operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to our newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SCthese lease renewals and is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. We closed on this new facility on August 15, 2018. Excluding the four month lease renewal at the 91,776 square foot location, the 10 leases that have renewed represent 972,048 square feet, or 63% of the expiring square footage. Wewe have incurred or we expect to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $844,000 and leasing commission costs of approximately $898,000$756,000 in connection with five of these 10 lease renewals. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the 11 leases whichthat were renewed. In addition, the table below includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing commission costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged annually over the renewal term.terms.

Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Griffin (Atlanta), GA Rinnai America Corporation  218,120  $3.81  $3.93  12/31/20 $4.22  $4.22  12/31/22  2.0  $-0-  $0.13 
Fayetteville, NC Victory Packaging, L.P.  148,000   3.33   3.50  2/28/21  3.40   3.25  2/28/25  4.0   -0-   0.20 
Winston-Salem, NC Style Crest, Inc.  106,507   3.39   3.77  3/31/21  4.10   3.90  3/31/26  5.0   0.30   -0- 
Romulus, MI FedEx Corporation  71,933   5.15   5.15  5/31/21  5.95   5.95  5/31/26  5.0   0.56   0.12 
Augusta, GA FedEx Ground  59,358   8.64   8.64  6/30/21  8.64   8.64  6/30/23  2.0   -0-   -0- 
O’Fallon, MO Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC  102,135   4.37   4.44  6/30/21  5.05   4.88  6/30/26  5.0   0.20   -0- 
Corpus Christi, TX FedEx Ground  46,253   9.03   9.42  8/31/21  9.89   9.89  8/31/26  5.0   -0-   -0- 
Kansas City, MO Bunzl Distribution  158,417   4.65   4.86  9/30/21  4.44   4.26  9/30/26  5.0   -0-   0.27 
St. Joseph, MO Woodstream Corporation  256,000   3.57   3.70  9/30/21  3.89   3.75  9/30/26  5.0   0.14   0.12 
Topeka, KS Coca-Cola Bottling Co., LLC  40,000   8.30   8.30  9/30/21  7.10   6.75  9/30/26  5.0   0.60   0.21 
  Total  1,206,723                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $4.49  $4.64    $4.77  $4.66     4.2  $0.15  $0.12 

 

 

Property

 

 

 

Tenant

 

 

 

Square

Feet

  

Former

U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent

PSF

  

Former

Cash Rent

PSF

  

Former

Lease

Expiration

 

Renewal

U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent

PSF

  

Renewal

Initial

Cash Rent

PSF

  

Renewal

Lease

Expiration

 

Renewal

Term

(years)

  

Tenant

Improvement

Cost

PSF over

Renewal

Term (1)

  

Leasing

Commission Cost

PSF over

Renewal

Term (1)

 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (3) 

 

FedEx Ground

  91,776  $7.35  $7.35  07/31/18 $7.35  $7.35  11/30/18  0.3  $-0-  $-0- 
                                       
Chattanooga, TN FedEx Express  60,637  $5.13  $5.13  10/31/17 $5.26  $5.26  10/31/22  5.0  $0.44  $0.10 
Lakeland, FL FedEx Express  32,105   4.83   4.83  11/30/17  4.83   4.83  11/30/27  10.0   0.19   0.10 
Orlando, FL FedEx Express  110,638   5.69   6.02  11/30/17  6.02   6.02  11/30/27  10.0   0.20   0.12 
St. Joseph, MO Altec Industries  126,880   2.75   2.75  02/28/18  2.94   2.87  02/28/23  5.0   -0-   0.13 
Edwardsville, KS Carlisle Tire  179,280   4.23   4.39  05/31/18  4.10   4.15  07/31/23  5.2   0.05   0.16 
Augusta, GA FedEx Ground  59,358   7.64   7.64  06/30/18  8.64   8.64  06/30/21  3.0   -0-   -0- 
O’Fallon, MO Pittsburgh Glass Works  102,135   4.18   4.18  06/30/18  4.37   4.31  06/30/21  3.0   0.08   -0- 
Denver, CO FedEx Ground  69,865   8.08   8.08  07/31/18  8.72   8.72  10/31/25  7.3   -0-   0.17 
Beltsville, MD FedEx Ground  148,881   9.58   9.58  07/31/18  9.77   9.77  07/31/28  10.0   -0-   0.20 
Bedford Heights, OH FedEx Express  82,269   4.96   4.96  08/31/18  5.33   5.33  08/31/28  10.0   0.43   0.11 
  Total (2)  972,048                                 
                                       
Weighted Average (2)       $5.64  $5.71    $5.87  $5.87     6.8  $0.13  $0.14 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
(2)“Total” and “Weighted Average” amounts exclude the short-term renewal of the Hanahan (Charleston), SC property.
(3)Renewed for only four months because the tenant moved its operations from our 91,776 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC to a brand new, build-to-suit, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. We purchased the new facility on August 15, 2018.

Excluding the four-month lease renewal at the Hanahan (Charleston), SC location, the remaining 10These ten lease renewals result inhave a weighted average term of 6.8 years and a renewed U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $5.87$4.77 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent is also $5.87 per square foot.foot is $4.66. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $5.64$4.49 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.71$4.64 per square foot, representingresulting in an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 4.1%6.2% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 2.8%0.4% on a cash basis.

As further described in the three paragraphs below, of the five remaining leases originally set to expire during fiscal 2018 that did not renew, three of the properties were sold and one of the properties was re-tenanted. The three properties that were sold represent 12% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018, and one property, representing 14% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018, was re-tenanted for 3 years. The remaining lease that did not renew, expired on December 31, 2017 and represents 5% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018. This tenant leased 80,856 square feet at our 255,658 square foot industrial park located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA. This partially vacant property currently represents our only property with vacancy.

22
Table of Contents

Two leases were set to expire during fiscal 2018 with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) for our 65,067 square foot facility located in Kansas City, MO through July 31, 2018 and our 50,400 square foot facility located in Orangeburg, NY through February 28, 2018. Kellogg informed us that they would not be renewing these leases. On December 18, 2017,Effective October 1, 2020, we sold our property located in Kansas City, MO for $4,900,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $4,602,000 and on December 22, 2017, we sold our property located in Orangeburg, NY for $6,170,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,898,000. The sale of these two properties resulted in a realized gain of approximately $5,388,000, representing a 105% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a realized net gain of approximately $1,804,000, representing a 21% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis. In conjunction with the sale of these two properties, we simultaneously entered into a lease termination agreement with RGH Enterprises, Inc. (Cardinal Health) for each propertyour 75,000 square foot facility located in Halfmoon (Albany), NY whereby we received a termination fee from Kellogg totalingin the amount of $377,000, representing approximately $210,000 which represents a weighted average of 80%50% of the then remaining rent due under each respective lease.

On June 1, 2018, we sold a 68,370 square foot building located in Colorado Springs, CO for $5,800,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,465,000,the lease, which was our approximate U.S. GAAP net book carrying value. Prior to the sale of this property, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through September 2018. The tenant informed us that they would not be renewing this lease because they have moved their operations from our former 68,370 square foot facility to our newly constructed 225,362 square foot facility, which is also located in Colorado Springs, CO. On June 9, 2016, we purchased this newly constructed 225,362 square foot industrial building, which is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through January 2026.

Another remaining lease that was set to expire during fiscal 2018 was leased to Caterpillar Logistics Services, Inc. (Caterpillar) at our 218,120 square foot facility located in Griffin, GA through December 31, 2017. In September 2017, weon November 30, 2021. We simultaneously entered into a three10.4 year lease agreement with Rinnai America Corporation through December 31, 2020 for this location. The new lease commenced on January 1, 2018, with initial annual rent of $807,044, representing $3.70 per square foot, with 3.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of $831,000, representing $3.81 per square foot over the life of the lease. This compares to the former U.S. GAAP straight-line and the former cash rent of $5.36 per square foot, resulting in a decrease in the average lease rate of 28.9% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease of 31.0% on a cash basis.

Other Fiscal 2018 Leasing Activity

EffectiveUnited Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) which became effective November 1, 2017, we entered into a 10.2 year2020. The lease agreement with FBM Gypsum Supply of Illinois, LLCUPS provides for our 36,270 square foot facility located in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA. The lease agreement provided for twofive months of free rent, after which, on JanuaryApril 1, 2018,2021, initial annual rent of $159,588,$510,000, representing $4.40$6.80 per square foot, commenced, with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of approximately $172,000,$541,000, representing $4.74$7.21 per square foot throughover the expiration datelife of the lease, which is Decemberexpires March 31, 2027.2031. This new rent compares to the former averageU.S. GAAP straight-line rent of $3.56$574,000, representing $7.65 per square foot, and former cash rent of $8.19 per square foot, resulting in a decrease of $33,000, representing a 5.8% decrease on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease of 17.0% on a cash basis. The new 10.4 year lease agreement with UPS provides for an additional 9.3 years of lease term versus the former cashold lease with Cardinal Health. In addition, effective June 4, 2021, we completed a parking lot expansion at this location for a cost of $835,000 resulting in an initial increase in annual rent effective on the date of $3.88completion of $52,000 from $510,000, or $6.80 per square foot, to $562,000, or $7.50 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will continue to increase each year by 2.0% resulting in an increaseannualized rent from June 4, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of $622,000, or $8.29 per square foot.

Effective December 15, 2020, we entered into a 10.3 year lease with Hartford HealthCare Corporation for our previously vacant 55,000 square foot facility located in Newington (Hartford), CT. The new lease has free rent for the average lease rate of 33.1% onfirst four months, after which initial annual rent will be $288,000, representing $5.25 per square foot with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a U.S. GAAP straight-line basisannualized rent of $307,000, representing $5.60 per square foot over the life of the lease. Hartford HealthCare Corporation is rated “investment-grade” as defined by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and an increase of 13.4% on a cash basis.by Moody’s (www.moodys.com).

25
Table of Contents

Fiscal 20192022 Renewals

In fiscal 2019,2022, existing leases with respect to approximately 7%5% of our gross leasable area, representing 12seven leases totaling 1,485,7701.2 million square feet, is setwere scheduled to expire. AsTwo of the date of this Annual Report, 5 of the 12these seven leases have renewed. The five leases that havewere renewed thus far, for a weighted average term of 6.8 years, at a rental rate increase of 6.5% on a GAAP basis and flat on a cash basis. These two lease renewals represent 802,595104,000 square feet, or 54%9% of the expiring square footage scheduled to expire in fiscal 2022.

We have incurred or we expect to incur leasing commission costs of $220,000 in connection with one of these lease renewals and have a weighted average lease term of 8.4 years.

Wewe have incurred or we expect to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $1,786,000 and leasing commission costs of approximately $991,000$50,000 in connection with these fivethe other lease renewals.renewal. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the fivetwo leases whichthat were renewed. In addition, the table below includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing commission costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged annually over the renewal term.

23
Table of Contents

terms.

Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Houston, TX National Oilwell Varco  91,925  $8.26  $8.44  9/30/22 $8.88  $8.44  9/30/29  7.0  $-0-  $0.34 
Burr Ridge, IL Sherwin-Williams  12,500   12.80   12.94  10/31/21  12.99   12.94  10/31/26  5.0   0.80   -0- 
  Total  104,425                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $8.80  $8.98    $9.37  $8.98     6.8  $0.07  $0.31 

Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Somerset, NJ Taco Bell  21,365  $4.68  $4.68  10/14/18 $5.15  $5.15  10/14/23  5.0  $-0-  $-0- 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX Carrier Enterprise  184,317   8.20   8.55  01/11/19  6.24   6.00  01/31/24  5.0   0.20   0.39 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH (2) Siemens Real Estate  51,130   8.82   9.67  04/30/19  8.94   8.50  04/30/24  5.0   0.40   0.40 
Memphis, TN (2) FedEx Express  449,900   2.84   2.95  05/31/19  3.10   3.10  05/31/29  10.0   0.30   0.09 
Jacksonville, FL FedEx Express  95,883   5.40   5.40  05/31/19  5.59   5.59  05/31/29  10.0   0.16   0.11 
  Total  802,595                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $4.81  $5.00    $4.55  $4.46     8.4  $0.26  $0.15 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
(2)We have agreed to the renewal terms with the tenant and the finalized signed lease is forthcoming.

These fivetwo lease renewals result in a weighted average term of 8.4 years andhave a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $4.55$9.37 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is $4.46.$8.98. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $4.81$8.80 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.00$8.98 per square foot, resulting in a decrease in the weighted average lease ratean increase of 5.4%6.5% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 10.8%flat on a cash basis.

As discussed above, in the Fiscal 2018 Renewal section, our 91,776Our 105,000 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston)Cheektowaga (Buffalo), SC, was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and renewed for only four months, until November 30, 2018 because the tenant moved their operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to our newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. The new 265,318 square foot facilityNY is leased to FedEx Ground Package System,Sonwil Distribution Center, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. In addition, Carrier Enterprise, LLC (United Technologies)January 31, 2022. This tenant informed us that they will not be renewing their lease. We recently entered into a new seven-year lease agreement for this facility with UPS which becomes effective February 1, 2022 through January 31, 2029. The lease with UPS provides for initial annual rent of $683,000, representing $6.50 per square foot with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a U.S. GAAP straight-line annualized rent of $725,000, representing $6.90 per square foot over the life of the lease. This compares to the former U.S. GAAP straight-line rent and former cash rent of $6.00 per square foot, resulting in an increase in the average lease rate of 15.0% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 8.3% on a cash basis. This lease to UPS, along with the two lease renewals in the table above, results in a weighted average term of 6.9 years, at a rental rate increase of 10.0% on a GAAP basis and an increase of 3.3% on a cash basis. These three leases represent 209,000 square feet, or 18% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2022.

Also not included in the table above is our 60,000185,000 square foot facility located in Richmond, VA which expires onGranite City (St. Louis, MO), IL that is leased to Anheuser-Busch through November 30, 2018. Both our 91,776 square foot facility located2021. Anheuser-Busch renewed for only four months, until March 31, 2022, after which it is expected that they will be moving out. The four month extension provides for rent at an annualized rate of 150% of its current rent resulting in Hanahan (Charleston), SC and our 60,000 square foot facility located in Richmond, VA are currently being marketed.

On September 30, 2018, we had a weighted average lease maturity of 8.1 years with 7.5% of the weighted average grossan annualized rent scheduledof $1.3 million, representing $7.04 per square foot. This compares to expire each year.the former U.S. GAAP straight-line rent of $4.36 and former cash rent of $4.70 per square foot.

2426
Table of Contents

The following table presents certain information as of September 30, 2018,2021, with respect to our leases expiring over the future fiscal years endedending September 30th:

Expiration of Fiscal Year Ending

September 30th

 Property Count  Total Area
Expiring
(square feet)
  Annualized
Rent (in thousands)
  Percent of Gross
Annualized Rent
 
             
Vacant (1)  1   83,886  $-0-   0%
Shopping Center (2)  1   61,190   616   0%
2022  5   1,065,169   5,723   4%
2023  16   2,117,731   12,076   7%
2024  13   1,887,039   11,797   7%
2025  11   2,607,541   12,980   8%
2026  14   1,738,731   10,850   7%
2027  13   2,390,188   13,297   8%
2028  10   2,172,458   11,857   7%
2029  9   1,831,303   10,610   7%
2030  5   1,102,002   8,490   5%
2031  6   1,218,941   9,738   6%
2032  8   2,131,983   18,862   12%
2033  3   1,038,508   8,844   5%
2034  3   1,561,256   9,365   6%
2035  3   856,283   8,343   5%
2036  2   403,025   5,212   3%
2041  1   657,518   5,458   3%
Total (3)  122   24,924,752  $164,118   100%

Expiration of Fiscal Year Ended September 30th Property Count Total Area
Expiring
(square feet)
  Annualized
Rent
  Percent of Gross
Annualized Rent
 
            
Vacant (1) 1  80,856  $-0-   0%
Shopping Center (2) 1  64,220   807,000   1%
2019 6  681,395   3,914,000   3%
2020 4  383,449   2,129,000   2%
2021 10  1,206,723   5,467,000   4%
2022 7  1,138,320   6,419,000   5%
2023 13  1,668,804   9,481,000   7%
2024 12  1,584,634   10,094,000   8%
2025 9  2,404,478   12,271,000   10%
2026 7  982,226   7,922,000   6%
2027 11  2,304,616   12,629,000   10%
2028 11  2,571,915   13,826,000   11%
2029 5  1,171,338   5,454,000   4%
2030 4  1,044,832   7,403,000   6%
2031 3  963,269   7,122,000   6%
2032 6  1,724,838   13,134,000   10%
2033 2  639,068   6,514,000   5%
2034 1  558,600   2,206,000   2%
Total (3) 111  21,173,581  $126,792,000   100%

(1)“Vacant” represents 80,85681,000 square feet at our 255,658256,000 square foot industrial park located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA.PA and not included in the Property Count but included in the square feet is 3,000 square feet at our 64,000 square foot Shopping Center located in Somerset, NJ.
(2)“Shopping “Shopping Center” represents a multi-tenanted property which has lease expirations ranging from month-to-month to 2030.fiscal yearend “2030”.
(3)The property located in Monaca (Pittsburg)(Pittsburgh), PA is included in “Vacant” and is included in “2025” for its lease with NF&M International and therefore is counted as one property in the property count total. IncludedThe property located in “2021”St. Joseph, MO is included in “2026” for its tenant, Woodstream Corporation and is also included in “2023” isfor its tenant, Altec Industries, Inc., both of which occupy one property and therefore is counted as one property in the property count total.

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Litigation Relating to our Terminated Merger Agreement with Equity Commonwealth

 

None.We and the members of our Board of Directors are defendants in a class action lawsuit that was commenced in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland in August 2021, prior to termination of our merger agreement with EQC, and which currently remains pending. The lawsuit alleges that our directors violated their legal duties in connection with the proposed EQC merger and seeks injunctive relief and damages. We believe that the claims asserted in this lawsuit are without merit and that in any event the claims are now moot in light of the termination of the merger agreement. We intend to seek to have this lawsuit dismissed. However, litigation is inherently uncertain and there can be no assurance we will be successful in obtaining a dismissal. Four other lawsuits that had been brought with respect to the proposed merger with EQC after the transaction was announced have since been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs in light of the termination of the EQC merger agreement.

 

Former Litigation with Blackwells Capital and Allison Nagelberg

On November 4, 2021, we entered into a Release and Settlement Agreement with our former general counsel, Allison Nagelberg, and Blackwells Capital LLC (“Blackwells”) resolving legal proceedings that we had commenced against Ms. Nagelberg and Blackwells in the Superior Court of New Jersey relating to, among other things, Ms. Nagelberg having been named as a nominee of Blackwells for election to our Board of Directors at our 2021 annual meeting, and also resolving Ms. Nagelberg’s counterclaim against us seeking indemnification and advancement of expenses. In connection with the settlement, the parties exchanged mutual releases, whereby, among other things, Blackwells agreed to release claims, including those it had previously demanded that we assert against the members of our Board for alleged breach of their legal duties relating to the Board’s rejection of an unsolicited acquisition offer that we received from Blackwells in December 2020 and subsequent actions taken by the Board in connection with its review of strategic alternatives earlier this year.

Simultaneous with the Release and Settlement Agreement, we and Blackwells entered into a Cooperation Agreement that, among other things, resolved a potential proxy contest to elect directors at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Under the Cooperation Agreement, Blackwells also agreed, among other things, to withdraw its slate of proposed nominees and various shareholder proposals for consideration at the 2021 Annual Meeting and committed to vote all its shares of our common stock at the 2021 Annual Meeting in favor of all of the Board’s director nominees and in support of all Board-recommended proposals, including voting in favor of the Merger Agreement with ILPT. Blackwells also agreed to comply with certain additional standstill, voting and affirmative solicitation commitments and terms.

The estimated costs associated with the Release and Settlement Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement and the related litigation and potential litigation have been reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

2527
Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Since June 1, 2010, the common stock of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, $0.01 par value per share (common stock), has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), under the symbol “MNR”.“MNR.” Previously, the common stock was traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Shareholder Information

As of November 15, 2018, 1,2781, 2021, 1,191 shareholders of record held shares of our common stock.

Dividends

On January 14, 2021, our Board of Directors approved a 5.9% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.18 per share from $0.17 per share representing an annualized dividend rate of $0.72 per share. This increase was the third dividend increase in the past five years, representing a total increase of 20%. We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 30 consecutive years. We are one of the few REITs that maintained our dividend throughout the Global Financial Crisis. We currently expect that comparable cash dividends will continue to be paid in the future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Purchases of Equity Securities

On January 16, 2018, theSeptember 14, 2021, our Board of Directors reaffirmed our ShareCommon Stock Repurchase Program (Repurchase Program)(the “Program”) that authorizes us to purchase up to $10,000,000 in the aggregate$50.0 million of shares of our common stock. The Repurchase Program was originally created on March 3, 2009timing, manner, price and is intendedamount of any repurchase will be determined by us at our discretion and will be subject to be implemented through purchases made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include openeconomic and market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or block trades, or by any combination of such methods, in accordance withconditions, stock price, applicable insider tradinglegal requirements and other securities laws and regulations.factors. The size, scope and timing of any purchases will be based on business, market and other conditions and factors, including price, regulatory and contractual requirements or consents, and capital availability. The Repurchase Program does not require us to acquire any particular amount of common stock,have a termination date and the program may be suspended modified or discontinued at any time at our discretion without prior notice. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018,2020, we did not reacquire any of our ownrepurchased 400,000 shares of common stock. The maximum dollar value that may be purchased under the Repurchase Program as of September 30, 2018 is $10,000,000.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

At our Annual Meeting held on May 18, 2017, our common shareholders approved our Amended and Restated 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the Plan) which extended the term of our 2007 Incentive Award Plan for an additional 10 years, until March 13, 2027, added 1,600,000 shares of common stock to the share reserve, expanded the types of awards available for grant under the Plan and made other improvements to the 2007 Plan. As of September 30, 2018, there were 1,671,872 shares available for grant as stock options, restricted stock and other equity-based awards under the Plan. During fiscal 2018, options to purchase 65,000 shares were granted with an exercise price of $17.80 and options to purchase 40,000 shares were exercised at an exercise price of $14.24 per share for total proceeds of $569,600. In addition, during fiscal 2018, 12,500 shares of restricted common stock were granted with a fair value on the grant date of $16.47 per share. In addition, during fiscal 2018, 3,670 unrestricted shares of common stock were granted with a weighted average fair value on the grant date of $16.10 per share. See Note 9 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K for a description of the plan. See Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters for a table of beneficial ownership of our common stock.stock for $4.3 million at an average price of $10.69 per share. These were the only repurchases made under the Program thus far.

2628
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information, as of September 30, 2018, relating to our equity compensation plan (including individual compensation arrangements) pursuant to which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:

  Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan (excluding Securities reflected in column (a)) 
Plan Category (a)  (b)  (c) 
          
Equity Compensation Plan Approved by Security Holders  695,000  $12.17   1,671,872 
             
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders  -   -   - 
             
Total  695,000  $12.17   1,671,872 

Comparative Stock Performance

The following line graph compares the total return of our common stock for the last five fiscal years to the FTSE NAREITNareit Composite Index (US), published by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT)(Nareit), and the S&P 500 Index for the same period. The graph assumes a $100 investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes listed below on September 30, 20132016 and the reinvestment of all dividends. The total return reflects stock price appreciation and dividend reinvestment for all three comparative indices. The information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but neither its accuracy nor its completeness is guaranteed. Our stock performance shown in the graph below is not indicative of future stock performance.

ITEM 6 – [RESERVED]

2729
Table of Contents

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected financial and other information on us for the periods and as of the dates indicated. This table should be read in conjunction with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and all of the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

  September 30, 
  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014 
OPERATING DATA:                    
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $139,161,849  $116,385,305  $97,755,433  $77,775,497  $64,672,341 
Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses  (24,390,117)  (20,154,556)  (17,568,623)  (12,490,019)  (11,317,479)
Net Operating Income - NOI  114,771,732   96,230,749   80,186,810   65,285,478   53,354,862 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0-   238,625   1,182,890 
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  111,387   2,311,714   4,398,599   805,513   2,166,766 
Dividend and Interest Income  13,120,465   6,930,564   5,616,392   3,723,867   3,882,597 
General and Administrative Expenses  (8,776,579)  (7,809,546)  (7,936,124)  (6,305,928)  (5,709,937)
Acquisition Costs  -0-   (178,526)  (730,441)  (1,546,088)  (481,880)
Interest Expense (1)  (32,349,705)  (25,754,121)  (22,953,049)  (19,844,166)  (16,830,423)
Depreciation & Amortization Expense  (38,567,027)  (31,459,749)  (26,087,680)  (21,772,728)  (17,719,581)
Income from Continuing Operations  48,520,534   40,271,085   32,494,507   20,584,573   19,845,294 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments  7,485,266   -0-   -0-   5,021,242   -0- 
Net Income  56,005,800   40,271,085   32,494,507   25,605,815   19,845,294 
Preferred Dividends  (17,190,456)  (14,861,686)  (9,020,470)  (8,607,032)  (8,607,032)
Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   (2,467,165)  (2,942,149)  -0-   -0- 

Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders

 $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888  $16,998,783  $11,238,262 
Net Income Per Share                    

     Basic

 $0.71  $0.56  $0.50  $0.43  $0.40 
Diluted  0.71   0.56   0.50   0.43   0.40 

Net Income Attributable to Common

Shareholders Per Share

                    
Basic  0.49   0.32   0.31   0.29   0.23 
Diluted  0.49   0.32   0.31   0.29   0.23 

(1)Amortization expense related to Financing Costs are included in “Interest Expense”.

BALANCE SHEET DATA:               
Total Assets $1,718,377,886  $1,443,037,755  $1,223,485,885  $910,905,721  $739,843,222 
Real Estate Investments, net  1,512,512,785   1,260,830,451   1,013,103,314   806,465,906   627,068,988 
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable, net  711,545,649   591,364,371   477,476,010   368,904,953   283,882,528 
Loans Payable  186,608,676   120,091,417   80,790,684   85,041,386   25,200,000 
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  -0-   -0-   53,493,750   -0-   -0- 
7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock  -0-   -0-   -0-   53,493,750   53,493,750 
7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock  -0-   -0-   57,500,000   57,500,000   57,500,000 
6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock  287,200,025   245,986,125   135,000,000   -0-   -0- 
Total Shareholders’ Equity  797,905,767   712,865,696   597,858,098   446,010,640   420,631,082 
                     
CASH FLOW DATA:                    
Net Cash Provided (Used) By:                    
Operating Activities $85,529,162  $73,867,866  $54,699,500  $38,062,285  $34,856,285 
Investing Activities  (332,513,200)  (339,071,013)  (227,845,089)  (194,469,735)  (131,809,697)
Financing Activities  246,082,577   179,679,685   256,821,188   148,006,698   105,023,561 

  September 30, 
 2018  2017  2016  2015  2014 
OTHER INFORMATION:               
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding               
Basic  78,619,440   72,114,078   65,468,564   59,085,888   49,829,924 
Diluted  78,802,208   72,249,691   65,558,284   59,201,296   49,925,036 
Funds From Operations* $69,841,849  $54,442,611  $46,598,043  $33,730,447  $29,000,443 
Core Funds From Operations* $69,841,849  $57,088,302  $50,270,633  $35,276,535  $29,482,323 
Adjusted Funds From Operations* $68,375,031  $54,880,438  $45,865,343  $33,976,958  $25,843,710 
Cash Dividends per Common Share $0.68  $0.64  $0.64  $0.60  $0.60 

28
Table of Contents

* We assess and measure our overall operating results based upon an industry performance measure referred to as Funds From Operations (FFO), which we believe is a useful indicator of our operating performance. FFO is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure of a REIT. FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), represents net income attributable to common shareholders, as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), excluding extraordinary items, as defined under U.S. GAAP, gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated real estate assets, impairment charges related to depreciable real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization. FFO includes gains and losses realized on sale of securities investments. NAREIT created FFO as a non-GAAP supplemental measure of REIT operating performance. We define Core Funds From Operations (Core FFO) as FFO, plus acquisition costs and costs associated with the Redemption of Preferred Stock. We define Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO) as Core FFO, excluding stock based compensation expense, depreciation of corporate office tenant improvements, amortization of deferred financing costs, lease termination income, net gain or loss on sale of securities transactions, effect of non-cash U.S. GAAP straight-line rent adjustments, non-recurring other expenses and subtracting recurring capital expenditures. We define recurring capital expenditures as all capital expenditures that are recurring in nature, excluding capital expenditures related to expansions at our current locations or capital expenditures that are incurred in conjunction with obtaining a new lease or a lease renewal. We believe that, as widely recognized measures of performance used by other REITs, FFO, Core FFO and AFFO may be considered by investors as supplemental measures to compare our operating performance to those of other REITs. FFO, Core FFO and AFFO exclude historical cost depreciation as an expense and may facilitate the comparison of REITs which have a different cost basis. However, other REITs may use different methodologies to calculate FFO, Core FFO and AFFO and, accordingly, our FFO, Core FFO and AFFO may not be comparable to all other REITs. The items excluded from FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are significant components in understanding our financial performance.

FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are non-GAAP performance measures and (i) do not represent Cash Flow from Operations as defined by U.S. GAAP; (ii) should not be considered as an alternative to Net Income or Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders as a measure of operating performance or to Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities; and (iii) are not an alternative to Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities as a measure of liquidity. FFO, Core FFO and AFFO, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other REITs.

The following is a reconciliation of our U.S. GAAP Net Income to our FFO, Core FFO and AFFO for the fiscal years ended September 30th:

  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888  $16,998,783  $11,238,262 
Plus: Depreciation Expense (Excluding Corporate Office)  36,017,959   29,478,322   23,931,530   19,625,748   15,908,769 
Plus: Amortization of Intangible Assets  1,613,368   1,071,719   1,178,744   1,370,654   1,347,936 
Plus: Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs  880,444   855,000   955,881   756,504   505,476 
Less: (Gain) / Plus: Loss on Sale of Real Estate Investments  (7,485,266)  95,336   -0-   (5,021,242)  -0- 
FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders  69,841,849   54,442,611   46,598,043   33,730,447   29,000,443 
Plus: Acquisition Costs  -0-   178,526   730,441   1,546,088   481,880 
Plus: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   2,467,165   2,942,149   -0-   -0- 
Core FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders  69,841,849   57,088,302   50,270,633   35,276,535   29,482,323 
Plus: Stock Compensation Expense  433,895   624,706   926,465   448,895   347,002 
Plus: Depreciation of Corporate Office Capitalized Costs  157,964   156,676   123,492   79,572   -0- 
Plus: Amortization of Financing Costs  1,220,983   1,234,259   1,116,238   1,286,016   725,745 
Plus: Non-recurring Other Expense (1)  -0-   -0-   500,000   -0-   -0- 
Less: Lease Termination Income  (210,261)  -0-   -0-   (238,625)  (1,182,890)
Less: Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (111,387)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)  (805,513)  (2,166,766)
Less: Effect of non-cash U.S. GAAP Straight-line Rent Adjustment  (1,972,588)  (1,027,927)  (1,709,821)  (1,446,264)  (600,745)
Less: Recurring Capital Expenditures  (985,424)  (883,864)  (963,065)  (623,658)  (760,959)
AFFO Attributable to Common Shareholders $68,375,031  $54,880,438  $45,865,343  $33,976,958  $25,843,710 

(1)Consists of one-time payroll expenditures in fiscal 2016.

29
Table of Contents

ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONOPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations or forecasts of future events. In particular, statements relating to our liquidity and capital resources, portfolio performance and results of operations contain forward-looking statements. Furthermore, all of the statements regarding future financial performance are forward-looking statements. We are including this cautionary statement to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Securities Act and Exchange Act for any such forward-looking statements. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this Form 10-K are based on management’s belief and assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. Forward-looking statements can be identified by their use of forward-looking words, such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “should,” “seek” or comparable terms, or the negative use of those words, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, performance and underlying assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts.

The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements are not predictions of future events. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. Some of these factors are described below and under the headings “Business”, “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.Operations.” These and other risks, uncertainties and factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those included in any forward-looking statements we make. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and we do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, among others:

the ability of our tenants to make payments under their respective leases;
our reliance on certain major tenants;
our ability to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or that become vacant;
our ability to obtain suitable tenants for our properties;
changes in real estate market conditions, economic conditions in the industrial sector, the markets in which our properties are located and general economic conditions;
the inherent risks associated with owning real estate, including local real estate market conditions, governing laws and regulations and illiquidity of real estate investments;
our ability to acquire, finance and sell properties on attractive terms;
our ability to repay debt financing obligations;
our ability to refinance amounts outstanding under our debt obligations at maturity on terms favorable to us, or at all;
the loss of any member of our management team;
our ability to comply with debt covenants;
our ability to integrate acquired properties and operations into existing operations;

30
Table of Contents

continued availability of proceeds from issuances of our debt or equity securities;

30
Table of Contents

the availability of other debt and equity financing alternatives;
market conditions affecting our investments in marketable securities of other REITs;
changes in interest rates, including the replacement of the LIBOR reference rate, under our current credit facility and under any additional variable rate debt arrangements that we may enter into in the future;
our ability to successfully implement our selective acquisition strategy;
our ability to maintain internal controls and procedures to ensure all transactions are accounted for properly, all relevant disclosures and filings are timely made in accordance with all rules and regulations, and any potential fraud or embezzlement is thwarted or detected;
changes in federal or state tax rules or regulations that could have adverse tax consequences;
declines in the market prices of our investment securities; and
the effect of COVID-19 on our business and general economic conditions;
our ability to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.purposes;
inability to complete the proposed merger with ILPT because, among other reasons, one or more conditions to the closing of the proposed transaction may not be satisfied or waived;
uncertainty as to the timing of completion of the proposed merger;
potential adverse effects or changes to relationships with our tenants, employees, service providers or other parties conducting business with us resulting from the announcement or completion of the proposed merger;
the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against the parties and others related to the merger agreement;
possible disruptions from the proposed merger that could harm our business, including current plans and operations;
unexpected costs, charges or expenses resulting from the proposed merger; and
the possibility that the benefits anticipated from the proposed merger will not be realized or will not be realized within the expected time period.

You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, as events described or implied in such statements may not occur. Although we have entered into the merger agreement with ILPT, there can be no assurance that the merger and other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will be completed.

We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

Merger Agreement with ILPT

As previously announced, on November 5, 2021, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Industrial Logistics Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“ILPT”), and Maple Delaware Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of ILPT (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, we would be acquired by ILPT in an all-cash transaction for $21 per common share, payable in cash (representing an aggregate equity value of approximately $2.1 billion). The Merger Agreement provides, among other things, that we will be merged with and into Merger Sub (the “Merger”), with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving entity and as a wholly owned subsidiary of ILPT. Following the Merger, our common stock would no longer be traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

31
Table of Contents

The Merger Agreement provides that each share of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”) outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”) (other than shares of Common Stock owned by ILPT, Merger Sub or any wholly owned subsidiary of us or ILPT) will, at the Effective Time, automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive $21.00 in cash (the “Common Stock Merger Consideration”), without interest and subject to applicable withholding taxes. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, as of the Effective Time, (i) each outstanding stock option will become fully vested and be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (A) the excess, if any, of the Common Stock Merger Consideration over the applicable exercise price of such option, multiplied by (B) the number of shares subject to such option, subject to applicable withholding taxes, and (ii) each restricted stock award and restricted stock unit award that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will become fully vested and be converted into the right to receive the Common Stock Merger Consideration in respect of each underlying share of Common Stock, subject to applicable withholding taxes. Upon closing of the merger with ILPT, holders of our outstanding 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”) will receive the amount of $25 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. We plan to continue to pay our regular quarterly common stock dividend and our Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock dividend for each full quarterly dividend period completed prior to the closing of the transaction.

ILPT’s acquisition of us is subject to obtaining the requisite approval of our common stockholders and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. The obligation of the parties to complete the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of the Merger Agreement by holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote thereon (the “Company Stockholder Approval”) (ii) the absence of any law, order or injunction of a court or governmental entity of competent jurisdiction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, (iii) the accuracy of the representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement (subject to certain qualifications), (iv) the performance in all material respects by the parties of their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement that are required to be performed at or prior to the Effective Time and (v) the absence of a Company Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Merger Agreement) occurring after the date of the Merger Agreement.

We have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, covenants (i) to conduct its business in all material respects in the ordinary course during the period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the closing of the Merger, and not to engage in specified types of transactions during this period, subject to certain exceptions and (ii) to convene a meeting of its stockholders for the purpose of obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval. The Merger Agreement contains customary no-shop restrictions that limit the ability of us and our representatives to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties, subject to customary “fiduciary out” provisions.

Our Merger Agreement with ILPT represents the culmination of the publicly announced comprehensive strategic alternatives review processes conducted by our Board of Directors this year. Our Board re-initiated its strategic alternatives review process in September 2021 after a previous agreement for a merger that we entered into with another party, following a strategic alternatives review process earlier this year, did not receive the requisite approval of our stockholders and was terminated.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

Overview

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, founded in 1968, is one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world. We are a self-administered and self-managed REIT that seeks to invest in well-located, modern, singlesingle- tenant industrial buildings, leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases.net-leases. During the fiscal year 2021, we purchased four new built-to-suit, net-leased, industrial properties, located in the following MSA’s: Columbus, OH, Atlanta, GA, Burlington, VT and Knoxville, TN, totaling approximately 1.6 million square feet on 316.2 acres, for an aggregate purchase price of $258.4 million. These four properties are expected to generate annualized rental income over the life of their leases of $15.2 million. In connection with two of the four properties acquired during the 2021 fiscal year, we entered into one 17 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan and one 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan. In connection with the remaining two properties acquired during the 2021 fiscal year, we entered into commitments for two 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans. These four fully-amortizing loans have a weighted average term of 15.7 years. The principal amount of the four mortgage loans originally totaled $161.8 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.50% to 3.25%, resulting in a weighted average fixed interest rate of 2.89%. At September 30, 2018,2021, we held investments in 111122 properties totaling approximately 21,174,00024.9 million square feet. Total real estate investments were $1,719,578,419 at September 30, 2018.feet with a weighted average building age, based on the square footage of our buildings, of 10.2 years. These properties are located in 3032 states: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. All of these properties are 100% owned by us, directly or through wholly-owned subsidiaries, with the exception of an industrialone property in New Jersey, in which we own a 51% controlling equity interest, and a shopping center in New Jersey, in which we own a 67% controlling equity interest.majority interest in and is our only non-industrial asset, which is a shopping center in Somerset, NJ. All of our investment properties are leased on a net basis except for an industrial park in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA and our only non-industrial asset.

32
Table of Contents

Our weighted-averageweighted average lease expiration was 8.17.0 years and 7.97.1 years as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, and our average annualized rent per occupied square foot as of September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 was $6.01$6.61 and $5.93,$6.36, respectively. At September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, our overall occupancy rate was 99.6%99.7% and 99.3%99.4%, respectively. Our weighted average lease expiration has been 7.0 years or greater for over seven consecutive years. Our overall occupancy rate has been 98.9% or above for over six consecutive years.

We have a concentration of properties leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX). As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had approximately 21,174,00024.9 million leasable square feet, of property, of which approximately 10,083,00011.6 million square feet, or 48%47%, consisting of 6065 separate stand-alone leases, were leased to FDX and its subsidiaries (7%(5% to FDX and 41%42% to FDX subsidiaries). These properties are located in 2427 different states. As of September 30, 2018,2021, the 6065 separate stand-alone leases that are leased to FDX and FDX subsidiaries had a weighted average lease maturity of 9.47.5 years. The percentageAs of rentalSeptember 30, 2021, in addition to FDX and reimbursement revenueits subsidiaries, the only tenants that leased 5% or more of our total square footage were subsidiaries of Amazon, which are parties to five separate stand-alone leases for properties located in four different states, containing 1.5 million total square feet, comprising 6% of our total leasable square feet. Our Rental and Reimbursement Revenue from FDX and its subsidiaries was 58% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, consisting2021 totaled $104.3 million, or as a percentage of 7% leasedtotal rent and reimbursement revenues were, 57% (5% from FDX and 52% from FDX subsidiaries). In addition to FDX and 51% leasedits subsidiaries, the only tenants to FDX subsidiaries. No other tenant accounted forcomprise 5% or more of our total Rental and Reimbursement revenueRevenue were subsidiaries of Amazon, which represented 6% of our Rental and Reimbursement Revenue for the fiscal 2018.

In addition to real estate property holdings, we held $154,920,545 in marketable REIT securities atyear ended September 30, 2018, representing 8.0%2021. None of our undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). These liquid real estate holdingsproperties are subject to a master lease or any cross-collateralization agreements.

FDX and Amazon are publicly-listed companies and financial information related to these entities are available at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. FDX and Amazon are rated “BBB” and “AA”, respectively by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and are rated “Baa2” and “A1”, respectively by Moody’s (www.moodys.com), which are both considered “Investment Grade” ratings. The references in this report to the SEC’s website, S&P Global Ratings’ website and Moody’s website are not included in calculatingintended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the tenant concentration ratios above and therefore further increase our diversification. The securities portfolio provides us with additional diversification, liquidity, and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available.information of FDX, Amazon, S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on such websites.

31
Table of Contents

Our revenue primarily consists of rental and reimbursement revenue from the ownership of industrial rental property. Rental and Reimbursement Revenue increased $22,776,544,$14.9 million, or 20%9%, for the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, as compared to the year ended September 30, 2017.2020. The increase was due mainly to the revenue relating to the property acquisitions made during fiscal 2021 and 2020. Total expenses (excluding other income and expense) increased $12,131,346,$42.4 million, or 20%49%, for the year ended September 30, 20182021 as compared to the year ended September 30, 2017.2020. The increases wereincrease was due mainly to the revenueNon-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs of $35.9 million and expenses relatingdepreciation expense which increased $4.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2021 as compared to the property acquisitions made during fiscal 2018 and 2017.year ended September 30, 2020.

Our Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders increased $15,873,110,$93.4 million, or 69%192%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20182021 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172020 and increased $2,410,346,decreased $59.6 million, or 12%541%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172020 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016.2019. The increases wereincrease in our Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders from the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 was primarily due to the purchaseUnrealized Holding Gain Arising During the Period of additional properties$50.2 million offset by Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs of $35.9 million. The decrease in our Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders from the fiscal 2018year ended September 30, 2019 to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 was primarily due to an increase in unrealized gains and 2017.losses resulting from our securities investments. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, we recognized $77.4 million and $24.7 million of unrealized losses, respectively.

33
Table of Contents

We evaluate our financial performance using Net Operating Income (NOI) from property operations, which we believe is a useful indicator of our operating performance. NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders plus Redemption ofNet Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest, Preferred Stock, Preferred Dividends,Dividend Expense, General and Administrative Expenses, AcquisitionNon-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs, Non-recurring Severance Expense, Depreciation, Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and Intangible Assets, Interest Expense, including Amortization of Financing Costs, Unrealized Holding (Gains) Losses Arising During the Periods, less Dividend and Interest Income,Realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions, Realized Gain on Sale of Real Estate InvestmentsInvestment, Dividend Income and Lease Termination Income. The components of NOI are recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses, such as insurance, utilities, and repairs and maintenance. Other REITs may use different methodologies to calculate NOI and, accordingly, our NOI may not be comparable to allcertain other REITs.

The following is a reconciliation of our Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders to our NOI for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016:2019 (in thousands):

  2018  2017  2016 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888 
Plus: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   2,467,165   2,942,149 
Plus: Preferred Dividends  17,190,456   14,861,686   9,020,470 
Plus: General and Administrative Expenses  8,776,579   7,809,546   7,936,124 
Plus: Acquisition Costs  -0-   178,526   730,441 
Plus: Depreciation  36,175,923   29,634,998   24,055,022 
Plus: Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and
Intangible Assets
  2,391,104   1,824,751   2,032,658 
Plus: Interest Expense, including Amortization of
Financing Costs
  32,349,705   25,754,121   22,953,049 
Less: Dividend and Interest Income  (13,120,465)  (6,930,564)  (5,616,392)
Less: Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (111,387)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)
Less: Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments  (7,485,266)  -0-   -0- 
Less: Lease Termination Income  (210,261)  -0-   -0- 
Net Operating Income – NOI $114,771,732  $96,230,749  $80,186,810 
  2021  2020  2019 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders $44,764  $(48,617) $11,026 
Plus: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling
Interest
  2,996   (31)  152 
Plus: Preferred Dividend Expense  33,419   26,474   18,774 
Plus: General and Administrative Expenses  9,353   8,932   9,081 
Plus: Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs  35,920   -0-   -0- 
Plus: Non-recurring Severance Expense  -0-   786   -0- 
Plus: Depreciation  51,478   46,670   43,020 
Plus: Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and
Intangible Assets
  3,586   3,180   2,870 
Plus: Interest Expense, including Amortization of
Financing Costs
  37,880   36,376   36,912 
Plus: Unrealized Holding (Gains) Losses Arising During the Periods  (50,239)  77,380   24,680 
Less: Realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (2,248)  0   0 
Less: Realized Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  (6,376)  0   0 
Less: Dividend Income  (6,182)  (10,445)  (15,168)
Less: Lease Termination Income  (377)  0   0 
Net Operating Income – NOI $153,974  $140,705  $131,347 

The components of our NOI for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 are as follows:follows (in thousands):

 2018  2017  2016  2021  2020  2019 
              
Rental Revenue $115,864,119  $97,659,778  $81,592,429  $155,044  $141,583  $132,524 
Reimbursement Revenue  23,297,730   18,725,527   16,163,004   27,712   26,234   22,297 
Total Rental and Reimbursement Revenue  139,161,849   116,385,305   97,755,433   182,756   167,817   154,821 
Real Estate Taxes  (18,596,239)  (15,266,634)  (13,294,724)  (21,798)  (20,193)  (17,010)
Operating Expense  (5,793,878)  (4,887,922)  (4,273,899)  (6,984)  (6,919)  (6,464)
NOI $114,771,732  $96,230,749  $80,186,810  $153,974  $140,705  $131,347 

32
Table of Contents

NOI increased $18,540,983,$13.3 million, or 19%9%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018,2021 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172020 and increased $16,043,939,$9.4 million, or 20%7%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172020 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016.2019. The increase from fiscal year 20172020 to 20182021 was due to the additional income related to sevenfour industrial properties purchased during fiscal 20182021 and the purchase of tenfive industrial properties during fiscal 2017.2020. The increase from fiscal year 20162019 to 20172020 was due to the additional income related to tenfive industrial properties purchased during fiscal 20172020 and the purchase of eightthree industrial properties during fiscal 2016.2019.

34
Table of Contents

We evaluate our financial performance using earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for real estate (Adjusted EBITDA) from property operations, which we believe is a useful indicator of our operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders plus, Preferred Dividend Expense, Interest Expense, including Amortization of Financing Costs, Depreciation, Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and Intangible Assets, Unrealized Holding (Gains) Losses Arising During the Periods, and Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs less Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions and Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments and our portion of these items related to our consolidated investment that we have a non-controlling interest in. Other REITs may use different methodologies to calculate Adjusted EBITDA and, accordingly, our Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to certain other REITs.

The following is a reconciliation of our Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders to our Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

  2021  2020  2019 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders $44,764  $(48,617) $11,026 
Plus: Preferred Dividend Expense  33,419   26,474   18,774 
Plus: Interest Expense, including Amortization of
Financing Costs
  37,880   36,376   36,912 
Plus: Depreciation and Amortization  55,064   49,850   45,890 
Plus: Net Amortization of Acquired Above and Below
Market Lease Revenue
  103   103   103 
Plus: Unrealized Holding (Gains) Losses Arising During the Periods  (50,239)  77,380   24,680 
Plus: Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs  35,920   0   0 
Less: Realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (2,248)  0   0 
Less: Realized Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments (A)  (3,252)  0   0 
Adjusted EBITDA $151,411  $141,566  $137,385 

(A)Represents our portion of the net realized gain from the sale of our property that we owned a 51% interest in.

Adjusted EBITDA increased $9.8 million, or 7%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 and increased $4.2 million, or 3%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019. The increase from fiscal year 2020 to 2021 was due to the additional income related to four industrial properties purchased during fiscal 2021 and the purchase of five industrial properties during fiscal 2020. The increase from fiscal year 2019 to 2020 was due to the additional income related to five industrial properties purchased during fiscal 2020 and the purchase of three industrial properties during fiscal 2019.

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, gross revenue, which includes Rental Revenue, Reimbursement Revenue and Dividend and Interest Income, totaled $152,282,314, $123,315,869$188.9 million, $178.3 million and $103,371,825,$170.0 million, respectively.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 19, 2018,27, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 347,145291,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.046.0 acres, located in Trenton, NJ.the Birmingham, AL MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2032.July 2036. The purchase price was $85,248,352.$30.2 million. We obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000$19.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%.2.40%, which has not yet closed. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $5,328,000.$1.7 million.

The industrial property purchased thus far during fiscal 2019 increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 21,521,000.

In addition to the $30.2 million property purchased subsequent to our fiscal yearend,in October 2021, as described above, we have entered into agreements to purchase twothree, new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Alabama, Georgia and North Carolina, consisting of approximately 398,000Texas, totaling 1.1 million square feet, withfeet. These future acquisitions have net-leased terms ranging from 10 to 15 years with a weighted average lease term of 13.412.6 years. The total purchase price for these three properties is approximately $68,747,000$126.8 million. All three properties are leased to companies, or subsidiaries of companies, that are considered Investment Grade by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and bothby Moody’s (www.moodys.com). Two of these three properties, consisting of an aggregate of 563,000 square feet, or 52% of the total leasable area, are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing all three of these transactions during fiscal 2022.

35
Table of Contents

We have several FedEx Ground parking expansion projects in progress with more under discussion. Currently there are nine parking expansion projects underway, which we expect to cost approximately $42.6 million. These parking expansion projects will enable us to capture additional rent while lengthening the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020.  In connection with oneterms of these leases. We are also in discussions to expand the parking at eight additional locations bringing the total recently completed and likely future parking lot expansion projects to 18 currently.

Due to the proliferation of ecommerce sales and last mile deliveries, it is important to take into account the large amounts of real estate utilized for trailer, van, and car parking at many of our properties wein determining how our in-place rental rates compare to market rental rates for properties being used in a similar manner. Rents per square foot on properties that may be nearby, but have entered into a commitmentonly limited acreage devoted to obtain a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $17,500,000 with a fixed interest rate of 4.40%. We may make additional acquisitions in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020, andparking, are poor comparisons as they cannot accommodate the funds for these acquisitions may come from funds generated from operations, mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, sale of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the DRIP, proceeds from the Preferred Stock ATM Program, and proceeds from private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities. To the extent that funds or appropriate properties are not available, fewer acquisitions will be made.same tenant needs.

During the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, we completed a total of seventhree property expansions, consisting of threeone building expansionsexpansion and fourtwo parking lot expansions. Three of the four parking lot expansions included the purchase of additional land. The three building expansionsexpansion resulted in approximately 312,000155,000 additional square feet. Total costs for all seventhree property expansions were approximately $22,189,000$12.9 million and resulted in total increased annual rent of approximately $2,090,000. Six$1.2 million. One of these completed expansions resulted in new ten yearten-year lease extensions for the expanded properties and one completed expansion resulted in a new twelve yearfifteen-year lease extension. The weighted average lease extension for these seventhree property expansions is 10.912.7 years.

For fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, Gross Revenues also include Dividend and Interest Income and Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions.Income. We hold a portfolio of marketable securities of other REITs with a fair value of $154,920,545$143.5 million as of September 30, 2018,2021, representing 8.0%5.6% of our undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). We intend to limit our marketable securities investmentsthe size of this portfolio to no more than approximately 10%5% of our undepreciated assets. We invest in REIT securities and, from time to time, may use margin debt when an adequate yield spread can be obtained. As of September 30, 2018 and 2017, there was $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 outstanding on the margin loan, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan. TheOur REIT securities portfolio provides us with additional diversification, liquidity, and income, and is a source of potential liquidity when needed and also serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available. As of September 30, 2018, our portfolio consisted primarily of 95% REIT common stocks and 5% REIT preferred stocks, all of which are listed on a national securities exchange. Our weighted-average yield onavailable in the securities portfolio for fiscal 2018 was approximately 9.5%. Dividend and Interest Income for fiscal 2018 was $13,120,465 compared to $6,930,564 for fiscal 2017. During fiscal 2018, we realized $111,387 in gains on sale of securities transactions.private real estate markets. We have unrealized losses of $24,744,579 in ournormally hold REIT securities portfolio as of September 30, 2018. The dividends received from our securities investments continue to meet our expectations. We intendlong-term and have the ability and intent to hold these securities for investment on a long-term basis.to recovery.

33
Table of Contents

We had $9,324,585$48.6 million in Cash and Cash Equivalents and $154,920,545$143.5 million in REIT securities as of September 30, 2018.2021. We believe that funds generated from operations, mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, salesales of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the DRIP, proceeds from the Preferred Stock ATM Program,our dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP), and proceeds from private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities, will provide sufficient funds to adequately meet our obligations over the next several years.

We have a As previously announced, in January 2021, when our Board of Directors first decided to explore strategic alternatives, the Board also determined to temporarily suspend our DRIP, in which participants can purchaseand our stock at a price that is approximately 95% of market value. Amounts received in connection with the DRIP (including dividend reinvestments of $12,928,356, $10,125,894 and $8,369,146 for fiscal years ended 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively) were $90,028,789, $91,931,831 and $72,175,797 for fiscal years ended 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

On June 29, 2017, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or B. Riley (formerly FBR Capital Markets & Co.), that provided for the offer and sale of shares of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, or our 6.125% Series C preferred stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced thisat-the-market offering program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) with B. Riley that provides for the offer and sale from time to timeCommon Stock at-the-market offering program (Common Stock ATM Program). Because our exploration of $125,000,000 ofstrategic alternative process is ongoing, our 6.125% Series C preferred stock. We began selling shares through these programs on July 3, 2017. Since inception through September 30, 2018, we sold 3,088,001 shares under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000, of which 1,648,556 shares were sold during the fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $40,094,000. As of September 30, 2018, there is approximately $119,096,000 remaining that may be sold under theDRIP currently remains suspended. Our Preferred Stock ATM Program.

As of September 30, 2018, 11,488,001 shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, in October 2018, we completed a public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $132,339,000.ATM Programs expired by their terms during August 2021.

Industrial space demand is very closely correlated to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth. Despite nine years of unprecedented monetary stimulus, real annual GDP growth averaged less than 2.0% over this period. Economic growth has been strong this past year further increasing demand for industrial space. The most significant demand driver for modernUS industrial real estate market conditions are as strong as they have ever been with record high asking rents, a robust development pipeline, and an all-time high occupancy rate of 96%. Companies are leasing space at record levels to handle the large increase in ecommerce sales as well as the need for safety stock to counter supply chain disruptions. Construction costs are rising dramatically due to the long lead times for sourcing materials. The amount of new construction for US industrial real estate has been increasing for several years as more industrial space is needed to handle direct-to-consumer distribution. It is estimated that ecommerce sales require three times the amount of warehouse space relative to brick and mortar retail sales. These new buildings are often highly automated and have much larger truck courts and parking requirements. Because modern industrial buildings are built to handle both wholesale distribution as well as direct to consumer distribution, they are known as omni-channel facilities. The West coast ports are continuing to experience severe bottlenecks in processing imports and as a result much container traffic is being diverted towards the Gulf and East coast ports. Given our geographic footprint, this trend is a very favorable one for us.

36
Table of Contents

Our portfolio of modern, net-leased industrial properties, continues to be ecommerce. Every year since the turn of the century, the percentage of goods purchased on-line has increased at an average 16% annual growth rate. Today, excluding food, fuel,provide shareholders with reliable and autos, approximately 19% of total retail sales have migrated from traditional store sales to on-line sales and we expect this growth in market share to continue.predictable income streams. We expect these favorable trends for the industrial real estate sector to be a leading demand driver for the foreseeable future, as consumers continue to embrace the added efficiencies of on-line consumption. The strong financial position of our tenants, together with the long duration of our leases, provides for high quality, reliable income streams throughout the business cycle.

We intend to continue to increase our real estate investments in fiscal 20192022 and 20202023 through acquisitions and expansions of our properties. The growth of theour real estate portfolio depends on the availability of suitable properties which meet our investment criteria and appropriate financing. Competition in the market areas in which we operate is significant and affects acquisitions, occupancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses of certain properties.

See PART I, Item 1 – Business and Item 1A – Risk Factors for a more complete discussion of the economic and industry-wide factors relevant to us and the opportunities and challenges, and risks on which we are focused.

34
Table of Contents

Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Significant accounting policies are defined as those that involve significant judgment and potentially could result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe the following significant accounting policies are affected by our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. For a detailed description of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K.

Real Estate Investments

 

We apply Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360-10, Property, Plant & Equipment (ASC 360-10) to measure impairment in real estate investments. Rental properties are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected future cash flows (on an undiscounted basis without interest) from a rental property is less than its historical net cost basis. These expected future cash flows consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. Upon determination that an other than temporary impairment has occurred, rental properties are reduced to their fair value. For properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the fair value of the property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the property measured at the time there is a commitment to sell the property and/or it is actively being marketed for sale. A property to be disposed of is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less its cost to sell. Subsequent to the date that a property is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded.

Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01 on April 1, 2017, upon acquisition of a property, we allocated the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consisted of land, building and intangible assets, including above and below market leases and in-place leases. We allocated the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property generally determined by the third-party appraisal of the property obtained in conjunction with the purchase. The purchase price was further allocated to acquired above and below market leases based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place lease rates over the remaining term. In addition, any remaining amounts of the purchase price were applied to in-place lease values based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. In-place leases that may have a customer relationship intangible value, including (but not limited to) the nature and extent of the existing relationship with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals were also considered. Acquired above and below market leases were amortized to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The value of in-place lease intangibles was amortized to amortization expense over the remaining lease term. If a tenant terminated its lease early, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvements, leasing commissions, deferred rent, and the in-place lease value was charged to expense when there was a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the termination agreement were met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration, if any, is probable of collection.

As a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-01, effective April 1, 2017, we no longer account for our property acquisitions as business combinations and instead account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets. In an acquisition of assets, certain acquisition costs are capitalized to real estate investments as part of the purchase price as opposed to being expensed as Acquisition Costs under the previous accounting treatment for business combinations. Therefore, as of April 1, 2017, we are no longer required to expense our Acquisition Costs.price. In addition, acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business combination are accounted for as asset acquisitions whereby the consideration incurred is allocated to the individual assets acquired on a relative fair value basis.

35
Table of Contents

We conducted a comprehensive review of all real estate asset classes in accordance with ASC 360-10, which indicates that asset values should be analyzed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a property may not be fully recoverable.

37
Table of Contents

The following are examples of such events or changes in circumstances that would indicate to us that there may be an impairment of a property:

A non-renewal of a lease and subsequent move outmove-out by the tenant;
A renewal of a lease at a significantly lower rent than a previous lease;
A significant decrease in the market value of a property;
A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a property is being used or in its physical condition;
A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a property, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;
An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a property;
A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a property; or
A current expectation that, more likely than not, a property will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life.

The process entails the analysis of property for instances where the net book value exceeds the estimated fair value. In accordance with ASC 360-10, an impairment loss shall be recognized if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. We utilize the experience and knowledge of our internal valuation team to derive certain assumptions used to determine an operating property’s cash flow. Such assumptions include re-leasing and renewal probabilities upon future lease expirations, vacancy factors, rental growth rates, and capital expenditures.

As part of our review of our property portfolio, we evaluated the oneour industrial property that was partially vacantproperties with vacancy at September 30, 2018.2021, which consists of 81,000 square feet, representing 0.3% of our total rentable square feet. The discounted cash flows expected from the lease applicable to the occupied portion of the property and the discounted cash flows expected from a potential lease applicable to the vacant portion of this propertythese properties exceeded its historical net cost basis. We consider, on a quarterly basis, whether the marketed rent (advertised) or the market rent has decreased or if any additional indicators are present which would indicate a significant decrease in net cash flows. We may obtain an independent appraisal to assist in evaluating a potential impairment for a property if it has been vacant for several years. We have also considered the properties which had lease renewals at rental rates lower than the previous rental rates and noted that the sum of the new discounted cash flows expected for the renewed leases exceeded these properties’ historical net cost basis.

We reviewed our operating properties in light of the requirements of ASC 360-10 and determined that, as of September 30, 2018,2021, the undiscounted cash flows over the holding period for these properties were in excess of their carrying values and, therefore, no impairment charges were required.

 

Securities Available for Sale

 

Investments in non-real estate assets consist primarily of marketable securities, which we generallysecurities. We intend to limit the size of this portfolio to no more than approximately 10%5% of our undepreciated assets, (which is ourwhich we define as total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).depreciation. The value of the marketable securities was $143.5 million as of September 30, 2021, representing 5.6% of our undepreciated assets. We continue to believe that our REIT securities portfolio provides us with diversification, income, a source of potential liquidity when needed and also serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available in the private real estate markets. Our decision to reduce this threshold mainly stems from the implementation of accounting rule ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which took effect at the beginning of the 2019 fiscal year. This rule requires that quarterly changes in the market value of our marketable securities flow through our Consolidated Statements of Income. The implementation of this accounting rule has resulted in increased volatility in our reported earnings and some of our key performance metrics. We individually review and evaluate our marketable securities for impairment on a quarterly basis, or when events or circumstances occur. We consider, among other things, credit aspects of the issuer, amount of decline in fair value over cost and length of time in a continuous loss position. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, a non-cash impairment charge is recognized in earnings and the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as the new cost basis.

3638
Table of Contents

We classify our securities among three categories: held-to-maturity, trading, and available-for-sale. Our securities at September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 are all classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices. Gains or losses on the sale of securities are calculated based on the average cost method and are accounted for on a trade date basis. Net unrealized holding gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized. The change in net unrealized holding gains (losses) is reflected as comprehensive income (loss).

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. These changes became effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. The most significant change for us, once ASU 2016-01 was adopted, was the accounting treatment for our investments in marketable securities that are classified as available for sale. The accounting treatment used for our Consolidated Financial Statements through Fiscal 2018, was that our investments in marketable securities, classified as available for sale, were carried at fair value, with net unrealized holding gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized and the change in net unrealized holding gains and losses being reflected as comprehensive income (loss). Under ASU 2016-01, effective October 1, 2018, these marketable securities continue to be measured at fair value, however the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses are now recognized through net income. Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2018, unrealized net holding losses of $24,744,579 were reclassed to beginning retained earnings to recognize the unrealized losses previously recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets.

Revenue Recognition and Estimates

Rental revenue from tenants with leases having scheduled rental increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Tenant recoveries related to the reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as we are generally, the primary obligor and, with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, hashave discretion in selecting the supplier and bearsbear the associated credit risk. These occupancy charges are recognized as earned. In addition, an estimate is made with respect to whether a provision for allowance for doubtful tenant and other receivables is necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management’s estimate of the amounts of the recorded tenant and other receivables at the balance sheet date that will not be realized from cash receipts in subsequent periods. If cash receipts in subsequent periods vary from our estimates, or if our tenants’ financial condition deteriorates as a result of operating difficulties, additional changes to the allowance may be required. We did not have an allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2018 or 2017.

37
Table of Contents

Lease Termination Income

Lease Termination Income is recognized in operating revenues when there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration is probable of collection. Lease termination amounts are paid by tenants who want to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual term of the lease agreement with us.

Two leases were set to expireWe did not recognize any lease termination fees during fiscal 2018 with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) for our 65,067 square foot facility located in Kansas City, MO through July 31, 2018 and our 50,400 square foot facility located in Orangeburg, NY through February 28, 2018. Kellogg informed us that they would not be renewing these leases. On December 18, 2017,2020. During fiscal 2021, effective October 1, 2020, we sold our property, located in Kansas City, MO for $4,900,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $4,602,000 and on December 22, 2017, we sold our property, located in Orangeburg, NY for $6,170,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,898,000. The sale of these two properties resulted in a realized gain of approximately $5,388,000, representing a 105% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a realized net gain of approximately $1,804,000, representing a 21% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis. In conjunction with the sale of these two properties, we simultaneously entered into a lease termination agreement with RGH Enterprises, Inc. (Cardinal Health) for each propertyour 75,000 square foot facility located in Halfmoon (Albany), NY whereby we received a termination fee from Kellogg totalingin the amount of $377,000 representing approximately $210,000 which represents a weighted average of 80%50% of the then remaining rent due under the lease, which was set to expire on November 30, 2021. We simultaneously entered into a 10.4 year lease agreement with United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) which became effective November 1, 2020. The lease agreement with UPS provides for five months of free rent, after which, on April 1, 2021, initial annual rent of $510,000, representing $6.80 per square foot, commenced, with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of $541,000, representing $7.21 per square foot over the life of the lease, which expires March 31, 2031. This compares to the former U.S. GAAP straight-line rent of $574,000, representing $7.65 per square foot, and former cash rent of $8.19 per square foot, resulting in a decrease of $33,000, representing a 5.8% decrease on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease of 17.0% on a cash basis. The new 10.4 year lease agreement with UPS provides for an additional 9.3 years of lease term versus the old lease with Cardinal Health. In addition, effective June 4, 2021, we completed a parking lot expansion at this location for a cost of approximately $835,000 resulting in an initial increase in annual rent effective on the date of completion of approximately $52,000 from approximately $510,000, or $6.80 per square foot, to approximately $562,000, or $7.50 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will continue to increase each respective lease.year by 2.0% resulting in an annualized rent from June 4, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of approximately $622,000, or $8.29 per square foot.

Only fourthree of our 111122 properties have leases that contain an early termination provision. These fourthree properties contain approximately 184,000177,000 total rentable square feet, representing less than 1% of our total rentable square feet. Our leases with early termination provisions are our 26,340 square foot location in Ridgeland (Jackson), MS, our 36,27036,000 square foot location in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA, our 38,83339,000 square foot location in Rockford, IL and our 83,000102,000 square foot location in Roanoke, VA.O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO. Each lease termination provision contains certain requirements that must be met in order to exercise each termination provision. These requirements include: the date termination can be exercised, the time frame that notice must be given by the tenant to us and the termination fee that would be required to be paid by the tenant to us. The total potential termination fee tofees that would be paidpayable to us from the fourthree tenants with leases that have a termination provision amounts to approximately $1,694,000.$1.5 million.

39
Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Occupancy and Rent per Occupied Square Foot

Our weighted-average lease expiration was 8.1 years and 7.9 years as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and our average annualized rent per occupied square foot as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $6.01 and $5.93, respectively. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, our occupancy was 99.6% and 99.3%, respectively.Fiscal 2021 Renewals

All improved properties were 100% occupied, except for one property located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA consisting of 255,658 rentable square feet, of which 68% or 174,802 square feet is occupied, resulting in a 99.6% overall occupancy percentage for our entire portfolio of properties.

Fiscal 2018 Renewals

In fiscal 2018,2021, approximately 8%5% of our gross leasable area, representing 16ten leases totaling 1,546,6371.2 million square feet, was set to expire. All ten of these leases have been renewed, resulting in a 100% retention rate for a weighted average term of 4.2 years, at a rental rate increase of 6.2% on a U.S. GAAP basis and an increase of 0.4% on a cash basis.

We have renewed 11incurred or we expect to incur leasing commission costs of the 16 leases that were set to expire during fiscal 2018, representing 1,063,824 square feet, or 69%$621,000 in connection with six of the expiring square footage. One of the 11 leases, which is with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., for a property located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC, renewed for only four months, until November 30, 2018, because the tenant moved their operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to our newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SCthese lease renewals and is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. We closed on this new facility on August 15, 2018. Excluding the four month lease renewal at the 91,776 square foot location, the 10 leases that have renewed represent 972,048 square feet, or 63% of the expiring square footage. Wewe have incurred or we expect to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $844,000 and leasing commission costs of approximately $898,000$756,000 in connection with five of these 10 lease renewals. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the 11 leases whichthat were renewed. In addition, the table below includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing commission costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged annually over the renewal term.terms.

38
Table of Contents
Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Griffin (Atlanta), GA Rinnai America Corporation  218,120  $3.81  $3.93  12/31/20 $4.22  $4.22  12/31/22  2.0  $-0-  $0.13 
Fayetteville, NC Victory Packaging, L.P.  148,000   3.33   3.50  2/28/21  3.40   3.25  2/28/25  4.0   -0-   0.20 
Winston-Salem, NC Style Crest, Inc.  106,507   3.39   3.77  3/31/21  4.10   3.90  3/31/26  5.0   0.30   -0- 
Romulus, MI FedEx Corporation  71,933   5.15   5.15  5/31/21  5.95   5.95  5/31/26  5.0   0.56   0.12 
Augusta, GA FedEx Ground  59,358   8.64   8.64  6/30/21  8.64   8.64  6/30/23  2.0   -0-   -0- 
O’Fallon, MO Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC  102,135   4.37   4.44  6/30/21  5.05   4.88  6/30/26  5.0   0.20   -0- 
Corpus Christi, TX FedEx Ground  46,253   9.03   9.42  8/31/21  9.89   9.89  8/31/26  5.0   -0-   -0- 
Kansas City, MO Bunzl Distribution  158,417   4.65   4.86  9/30/21  4.44   4.26  9/30/26  5.0   -0-   0.27 
St. Joseph, MO Woodstream Corporation  256,000   3.57   3.70  9/30/21  3.89   3.75  9/30/26  5.0   0.14   0.12 
Topeka, KS Coca-Cola Bottling Co., LLC  40,000   8.30   8.30  9/30/21  7.10   6.75  9/30/26  5.0   0.60   0.21 
  Total  1,206,723                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $4.49  $4.64    $4.77  $4.66     4.2  $0.15  $0.12 

Property Tenant Square Feet  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (3)  FedEx Ground  91,776  $7.35  $7.35  07/31/18 $7.35  $7.35  11/30/18  0.3  $-0-  $-0- 
                                       
Chattanooga, TN FedEx Express  60,637  $    5.13  $5.13  10/31/17 $5.26  $5.26  10/31/22  5.0  $0.44  $0.10 
Lakeland, FL FedEx Express  32,105   4.83   4.83  11/30/17  4.83   4.83  11/30/27  10.0               0.19             0.10 
Orlando, FL FedEx Express  110,638   5.69   6.02  11/30/17  6.02   6.02  11/30/27  10.0   0.20   0.12 
St. Joseph, MO Altec Industries  126,880   2.75   2.75  02/28/18  2.94   2.87  02/28/23  5.0   -0-   0.13 
Edwardsville, KS Carlisle Tire  179,280   4.23   4.39  05/31/18  4.10   4.15  07/31/23  5.2   0.05   0.16 
Augusta, GA FedEx Ground  59,358   7.64   7.64  06/30/18  8.64   8.64  06/30/21  3.0   -0-   -0- 
O’Fallon, MO Pittsburgh Glass Works  102,135   4.18   4.18  06/30/18  4.37   4.31  06/30/21  3.0   0.08   -0- 
Denver, CO FedEx Ground  69,865   8.08   8.08  07/31/18  8.72   8.72  10/31/25  7.3   -0-   0.17 
Beltsville, MD FedEx Ground  148,881   9.58   9.58  07/31/18  9.77   9.77  07/31/28  10.0   -0-   0.20 
Bedford Heights, OH FedEx Express  82,269   4.96   4.96  08/31/18  5.33   5.33  08/31/28  10.0   0.43   0.11 
  Total (2)  972,048                                 
                                       
Weighted Average (2)       $5.64  $5.71    $5.87  $5.87     6.8  $0.13  $0.14 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
(2)“Total” and “Weighted Average” amounts exclude the short-term renewal of the Hanahan (Charleston), SC property.
(3)Renewed for only four months because the tenant moved its operations from our 91,776 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston), SC to a brand new, build-to-suit, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. We purchased the new facility on August 15, 2018.

Excluding the four-month lease renewal at the Hanahan (Charleston), SC location, the remaining 10

These ten lease renewals result inhave a weighted average term of 6.8 years and a renewed U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $5.87$4.77 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is also $5.87 per square foot.$4.66. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $5.64 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.71 per square foot, representing an increase in the weighted average lease rate of 4.1% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 2.8% on a cash basis.

As further discussed below and under Fiscal 2018 dispositions, of the five remaining leases originally set to expire during fiscal 2018 that did not renew, three of the properties were sold and one of the properties was re-tenanted. The three properties that were sold represent 12% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018, and one property, representing 14% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018, was re-tenanted for 3 years. The remaining lease that did not renew, expired on December 31, 2017 and represents 5% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2018. This tenant leased 80,856 square feet at our 255,658 square foot industrial park located in Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA. This partially vacant property currently represents our only property with vacancy.

Another remaining lease that was set to expire during fiscal 2018 was leased to Caterpillar Logistics Services, Inc. (Caterpillar) at our 218,120 square foot facility located in Griffin, GA through December 31, 2017. In September 2017, we entered into a three year lease agreement with Rinnai America Corporation through December 31, 2020 for this location. The new lease commenced on January 1, 2018, with initial annual rent of $807,044, representing $3.70 per square foot, with 3.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of $831,000, representing $3.81 per square foot over the life of the lease. This compares to the former U.S. GAAP straight-line and the former cash rent of $5.36 per square foot, resulting in a decrease in the average lease rate of 28.9% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease of 31.0% on a cash basis.

39
Table of Contents

Other Fiscal 2018 Leasing Activity

Effective November 1, 2017, we entered into a 10.2 year lease agreement with FBM Gypsum Supply of Illinois, LLC for our 36,270 square foot facility located in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA. The lease agreement provided for two months of free rent, after which, on January 1, 2018, initial annual rent of $159,588, representing $4.40 per square foot commenced, with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of approximately $172,000, representing $4.74 per square foot through the expiration date of the lease, which is December 31, 2027. This new rent compares to the former average rent of $3.56$4.49 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former cash rent of $3.88$4.64 per square foot, representingresulting in an increase in the average lease rate of 33.1%6.2% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 13.4%0.4% on a cash basis.

Fiscal 2019 RenewalsEffective December 15, 2020, we entered into a 10.3 year lease with Hartford HealthCare Corporation for our previously vacant 55,000 square foot facility located in Newington (Hartford), CT. The new lease has free rent for the first four months, after which initial annual rent will be $288,000, representing $5.25 per square foot with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a U.S. GAAP straight-line annualized rent of $307,000, representing $5.60 per square foot over the life of the lease. Hartford HealthCare Corporation is rated “investment-grade” as defined by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and by Moody’s (www.moodys.com).

40
Table of Contents

 

Fiscal 2022 Renewals

In fiscal 2019,2022, existing leases with respect to approximately 7%5% of our gross leasable area, representing 12seven leases totaling 1,485,7701.2 million square feet, is setwere scheduled to expire. AsTwo of the date of this Annual Report, 5 of the 12these seven leases have renewed. The five leases that havewere renewed thus far, for a weighted average term of 6.8 years, at a rental rate increase of 6.5% on a GAAP basis and flat on a cash basis. These two lease renewals represent 802,595104,000 square feet, or 54%9% of the expiring square footage scheduled to expire in fiscal 2022.

We have incurred or we expect to incur leasing commission costs of $220,000 in connection with one of these lease renewals and have a weighted average lease term of 8.4 years.

Wewe have incurred or we expect to incur tenant improvement costs of approximately $1,786,000 and leasing commission costs of approximately $991,000$50,000 in connection with these fivethe other lease renewals.renewal. The table below summarizes the lease terms of the fivetwo leases whichthat were renewed. In addition, the table below includes both the tenant improvement costs and the leasing commission costs, which are presented on a per square foot (PSF) basis averaged annually over the renewal term.terms.

Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Somerset, NJ Taco Bell  21,365  $4.68  $4.68  10/14/18 $5.15  $5.15  10/14/23  5.0  $-0-  $-0- 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX Carrier Enterprise  184,317   8.20   8.55  01/11/19  6.24   6.00  01/31/24  5.0   0.20   0.39 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH (2) Siemens Real Estate  51,130   8.82   9.67  04/30/19  8.94   8.50  04/30/24  5.0   0.40   0.40 
Memphis, TN (2) FedEx Express  449,900   2.84   2.95  05/31/19  3.10   3.10  05/31/29  10.0   0.30   0.09 
Jacksonville, FL FedEx Express  95,883   5.40   5.40  05/31/19  5.59   5.59  05/31/29  10.0   0.16   0.11 
  Total  802,595                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $4.81  $5.00    $4.55  $4.46     8.4  $0.26  $0.15 
Property Tenant Square
Feet
  Former
U.S. GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Former
Cash Rent
PSF
  Former
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
U.S GAAP Straight- Line Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Initial
Cash Rent
PSF
  Renewal
Lease
Expiration
 Renewal
Term
(years)
  Tenant
Improvement
Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
  Leasing
Commission Cost
PSF over
Renewal
Term (1)
 
                               
Houston, TX National Oilwell Varco  91,925  $8.26  $8.44  9/30/22 $8.88  $8.44  9/30/29  7.0  $-0-  $0.34 
Burr Ridge, IL Sherwin-Williams  12,500   12.80   12.94  10/31/21  12.99   12.94  10/31/26  5.0   0.80   -0- 
  Total  104,425                                 
                                       
Weighted Average       $8.80  $8.98    $9.37  $8.98     6.8  $0.07  $0.31 

(1)Amount calculated based on the total cost divided by the square feet, divided by the renewal term.
(2)We have agreed to the renewal terms with the tenant and the finalized signed lease is forthcoming.

These fivetwo lease renewals result in a weighted average term of 8.4 years andhave a U.S. GAAP straight-line weighted average lease rate of $4.55$9.37 per square foot. The renewed weighted average initial cash rent per square foot is $4.46.$8.98. This compares to the former weighted average rent of $4.81$8.80 per square foot on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and the former weighted average cash rent of $5.00$8.98 per square foot, resulting in a decrease in the weighted average lease ratean increase of 5.4%6.5% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease in the weighted average lease rate of 10.8%flat on a cash basis.

As discussed above, in the Fiscal 2018 Renewal section, our 91,776Our 105,000 square foot facility located in Hanahan (Charleston)Cheektowaga (Buffalo), SC, was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and renewed for only four months, until November 30, 2018 because the tenant moved their operations from our 91,776 square foot facility to our newly constructed, much larger, 265,318 square foot facility, which is also located in Charleston, SC. The new 265,318 square foot facilityNY is leased to FedEx Ground Package System,Sonwil Distribution Center, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033. In addition, Carrier Enterprise, LLC (United Technologies)January 31, 2022. This tenant informed us that they will not be renewing their lease. We recently entered into a new seven-year lease agreement for this facility with UPS which becomes effective February 1, 2022 through January 31, 2029. The lease with UPS provides for initial annual rent of $683,000, representing $6.50 per square foot with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a U.S. GAAP straight-line annualized rent of $725,000, representing $6.90 per square foot over the life of the lease. This compares to the former U.S. GAAP straight-line rent and former cash rent of $6.00 per square foot, resulting in an increase in the average lease rate of 15.0% on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and an increase of 8.3% on a cash basis. This lease to UPS, along with the two lease renewals in the table above, results in a weighted average term of 6.9 years, at a rental rate increase of 10.0% on a GAAP basis and an increase of 3.3% on a cash basis. These three leases represent 209,000 square feet, or 18% of the expiring square footage for fiscal 2022.

Also not included in the table above is our 60,000185,000 square foot facility located in Richmond, VA which expires onGranite City (St. Louis, MO), IL that is leased to Anheuser-Busch through November 30, 2018. Both our 91,776 square foot facility located2021. Anheuser-Busch renewed for only four months, until March 31, 2022, after which it is expected that they will be moving out. The four month extension provides for rent at an annualized rate of 150% of its current rent resulting in Hanahan (Charleston), SC and our 60,000 square foot facility located in Richmond, VA are currently being marketed.

40
Table of Contents

On September 30, 2018, we had a weighted average lease maturity of 8.1 years with 7.5% of the weighted average grossan annualized rent scheduledof $1.3 million, representing $7.04 per square foot. This compares to expire each year.the former U.S. GAAP straight-line rent of $4.36 and former cash rent of $4.70 per square foot.

Acquisitions, Expansions and Dispositions During Fiscal 20182021 Acquisitions

 

Fiscal 2018 Acquisitions

On November 2, 2017,December 17, 2020, we purchased a newly constructed 121,683500,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 16.2100.0 acres, located in Charleston, SC. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX), for 15 years through August 2032. The purchase price was $21,872,170. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $14,200,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.23%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,315,000.

On November 30, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 300,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 123.0 acres, located in Oklahoma City, OK. The building is 100% net-leased to Amazon.com Services, Inc. for 10 years through October 2027. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon.com, Inc. The purchase price was $30,250,000. We obtained a 10 year mortgage loan, amortizing over 18 years, of $19,600,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.64%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,884,000.

On January 22, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 831,764 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.4 acres, located in Savannah, GA. The building is 100% net-leased to Shaw Industries, Inc. for 10 years through September 2027. The purchase price was $57,483,636. We obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $33,300,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.53%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $3,551,000.

On April 6, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 399,440 square foot industrial building, situated on 27.5 acres, located in Daytona Beach, FL. The building is 100% net-leased to B. Braun Medical Inc. for 10 years through April 2028. The purchase price was $30,750,540. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.25%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,130,000.

On June 28, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 362,942 square foot industrial building, situated on 31.3 acres, located in Mobile, AL. The building is 100% net-leased to Amazon.com Services, Inc. for 11 years through November 2028. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon.com, Inc. The purchase price was $33,688,276. We obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.14%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,020,000.

On August 15, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 265,318 square foot industrial building, situated on 48.9 acres, located in Charleston, SC.Columbus, OH MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033.September 2035. The purchase price was $47,174,296.$73.3 million. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $29,860,000$47.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 3.82%2.95%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,713,000.$4.6 million.

41
Table of Contents

On September 6, 2018,December 24, 2020, we purchased a newly constructed 373,750658,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 92.6130.2 acres, located in Braselton,the Atlanta, GA whichMSA. The building is 100% net-leased to Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. for 20 years through November 2040. The purchase price was $95.9 million. We obtained a 17 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $57.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 3.25%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $5.5 million.

On July 29, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 144,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 43.4 acres, located in the Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) .Burlington, VT MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through February 2033.May 2036. The property was acquired for a purchase price was $61,113,264. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $39,700,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.02%.$54.8 million. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $3,801,000.$3.2 million. Subsequent to the closing of the purchase, we obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $35.5 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.50%.

On August 25, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 259,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 42.6 acres, located in the Knoxville, TN MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through May 2036. The property was acquired for a purchase price of $34.4 million. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $2.0 million. Subsequent to the closing of the purchase, we obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $22.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.50%.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 291,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 46.0 acres, located in the Birmingham, AL MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through July 2036. The property was acquired for a purchase price of $30.2 million. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $1.7 million. We obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.40%, which has not yet closed.

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s ultimate parent, FDX, Amazon.com, Inc.FedEx Corporation, and Shaw Industries, Inc.’sHome Depot U.S.A., Inc’s ultimate parent, Berkshire Hathaway,Home Depot, Inc., are publicly-ownedpublicly-listed companies and financial information related to these entities isare available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. The references in this report to the SEC’s website are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information on thewww.sec.gov website.

41
Table of Contents

Fiscal 2018 Expansions2021 Disposition

On November 1, 2017, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., a subsidiary of FDX, located in Indianapolis, IN was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,683,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from April 2024 to October 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $184,000 from approximately $1,533,000, or $4.67 per square foot, to approximately $1,717,000, or $5.24 per square foot.

On September 27, 2018, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Ft. Mill, SC was completed for a total project cost of approximately $1,834,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from October 2023 to August 2028. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $183,000 from approximately $1,415,000, or $8.00 per square foot, to approximately $1,598,000, or $9.03 per square foot.

Fiscal 2018 Dispositions

Two leases were set to expire during fiscal 2018 with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) for our 65,067 square foot facility located in Kansas City, MO through July 31, 2018 and our 50,400 square foot facility located in Orangeburg, NY through February 28, 2018. Kellogg informed us that they would not be renewing these leases. On December 18, 2017,15, 2021, we sold our property located in Kansas City, MO for $4,900,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $4,602,000 and, on December 22, 2017, we sold our property located in Orangeburg, NY for $6,170,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,898,000. In conjunction with the sale of these two properties, we simultaneously entered into a lease termination agreement for each property whereby we received a termination fee from Kellogg totaling approximately $210,000 which represents a weighted average of 80% of the then remaining rent due under each respective lease.

On June 1, 2018, we sold a 68,37060,400 square foot building located in Colorado Springs, COCarlstadt, NJ which is in the New York, NY MSA, for $5,800,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,465,000.$13.0 million. Prior to the sale, we owned a 51% interest in this property. Our 51% portion of this property, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through September 2018. The tenant informed us that they would not be renewing this lease because they have moved their operations from our former 68,370 square foot facility to our newly constructed 225,362 square foot facility, which is also located in Colorado Springs, CO. On June 9, 2016, we purchased this newly constructed 225,362 square foot industrial building, which is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through January 2026.

On June 5, 2018, we sold an 87,500 square foot vacant building located in Ft. Myers, FL for $6,400,000, with netthe sale proceeds of approximately $6,119,000. Prior to this property becoming vacant, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through June 2017. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. vacated this property because they moved their operations from our former 87,500 square foot facility to our newly constructed 213,672 square foot facility, which is also located in Ft. Myers, FL. We purchased this newly constructed facility on December 30, 2016 and it is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through August 2027.

These four properties sold during fiscal 2018, resulted in a U.S. GAAP net realized gain applicable to common shareholders of approximately $7,485,000,$3.3 million, representing a 51%159% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a net realized gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis of approximately $1,160,000,$2.6 million, representing a 6%96% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis.

Comparison of Year Ended September 30, 20182021 to Year Ended September 30, 20172020

The following tables summarize our rental revenue, reimbursement revenue, real estate taxes, operating expenses, and depreciation expense by category. For the purposes of the following discussion, same propertiesSame Properties are properties owned as of October 1, 20162019 that have not been subsequently expanded or sold.

42
Table of Contents

Acquired Properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to September 30, 2016. Seventeen2019. Nine properties were acquired during fiscal 20182021 and fiscal 2017.2020. Acquired propertiesProperties include the properties located in Hamburg (Buffalo)Greenwood (Indianapolis), NY; Ft. Myers, FL; Walker (Grand Rapids)IN; Lancaster (Columbus),OH; Whitsett (Greensboro), MI; Mesquite (Dallas)NC; Ogden (Salt Lake City), TX; Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC; Homestead (Miami), FL;UT and Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl Distribution Oklahoma, Inc.); Concord (Charlotte) NC; Kenton, OH and Stow, OH (all acquired in fiscal 2017)2020) and Charleston, SC (FDX); OklahomaPlain City OK (Amazon.com Services, Inc.); Savannah,(Columbus), OH; Locust Grove (Atlanta), GA; Daytona Beach, FL; Mobile, AL; Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)Burlington, VT and Braselton (Atlanta)Kodak (Knoxville), GATN (all acquired in fiscal 2018)2021).

Expanded Properties include properties that were expanded subsequent to September 30, 2019. During fiscal 20182021 and 2017,2020, there were fourtwo property expansions completed at the properties located in Edinburg, TX; Ft. Myers, FL; Indianapolis, INOlathe (Kansas City), KS and Ft. Mill, SC. ExpandedHalfmoon (Albany), NY.

42
Table of Contents

Sold Properties include these properties that were expanded subsequent to September 30, 2016, with the exception of the property located in Ft. Myers, FL. Since this property was acquired in fiscal 2017 and subsequently expanded, it is therefore included in Acquired Properties instead of being included in Expanded Properties.

Sold property consists of four propertiesone property we sold during fiscal 20182021 which was a 60,400 square foot building located in Kansas City, MO; Orangeburg, NY; Colorado Springs, CO and Ft. Myers, FL and one property sold during fiscal 2017 locatedCarlstadt, NJ which is in White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul), MN.the New York, NY MSA, for a gross sales price of $13.0 million. Prior to the sale, we owned a 51% interest in this property.

As of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the overall occupancy ratesrate of our total property portfolio were 99.6%was 99.7% and 99.3%99.4%, respectively.

Rental Revenues 2018 2017 $ Change % Change 
         

Rental Revenues ($ in thousands)
 2021 2020 $ Change % Change 
Same Properties $84,576,670  $84,905,418  $(328,748)  0% $132,351  $131,882  $469   0%
Acquired Properties  26,492,913   7,086,464   19,406,449   274%  19,442   6,846   12,596   184%
Expanded Properties  4,220,958   4,045,681   175,277   4%  3,053   2,685   368   14%
Sold Properties  573,578   1,622,215   (1,048,637)  (65%)  198   170   28   16%
Total $115,864,119  $97,659,778  $18,204,341   19% $155,044  $141,583  $13,461   10%

The increase in rental revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly Acquired Properties.

Reimbursement Revenues ($ in thousands) 2021  2020  $ Change  % Change 
Same Properties $26,098  $25,244  $854   3%
Acquired Properties  1,022   326   696   213%
Expanded Properties  475   477   (2)  0%
Sold Properties  117   187   (70)  (37)%
Total $27,712  $26,234  $1,478   6%

Our single-tenant properties are subject to net leases, which require the tenants to absorb the real estate taxes, insurance and the majority of the repairs and maintenance. As such, we are reimbursed by the tenants for these expenses. Therefore, the increase in reimbursement revenues is offset by the increase in Real Estate Taxes and the increase in Operating Expenses, which includes insurance, repairs and maintenance and other operating expenses. The increase in reimbursement revenues from Same Properties is due to the increase in Same Properties real estate taxes and operating expenses reimbursed to us from our tenants. In addition, the increase in reimbursement revenues is also due to the increase from the newly Acquired Properties. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, Reimbursement Revenue as a percentage of Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses was 96.3% and 96.8%, respectively.


Real Estate Taxes ($ in thousands)
 2021  2020  $ Change  % Change 
Same Properties $20,696  $19,408  $1,288   7%
Acquired Properties  580   209   371   178%
Expanded Properties  460   463   (3)  (1%)
Sold Properties  62   113   (51)  (45%)
Total $21,798  $20,193  $1,605   8%

The increase in real estate taxes is mainly due to the increase in assessment values from Same Properties, which were mostly billed back to the tenants and offset the increase in the Reimbursement Revenues from Same Properties. Additionally, the increase is due to the newly Acquired Properties.

Operating Expenses ($ in thousands) 2021  2020  $ Change  % Change 
Same Properties $6,517  $6,761  $(244)  (4%)
Acquired Properties  351   39   312   800%
Expanded Properties  50   37   13   35%
Sold Properties  66   82   (16)  (20%)
Total $6,984  $6,919  $65   1%

The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to the newly Acquired Properties.

43
Table of Contents


Net Operating Income (NOI)* ($ in thousands)
 2021  2020  $ Change  % Change 
Same Properties $131,236  $130,959  $277   0%
Acquired Properties  19,533   6,924   12,609   182%
Expanded Properties  3,018   2,662   356   13%
Sold Properties  187   160   27   17%
Total $153,974  $140,705  $13,269   9%

The increase in NOI is mainly due to the newly Acquired Properties.

* The revenue and expense items related to property operations discussed above are components of NOI which are recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses. NOI is a non-GAAP performance measure. See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Overview” for a reconciliation of our Net Operating Income to our Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders.

Depreciation ($ in thousands) 2021  2020  $ Change  % Change 
Same Properties $42,958  $42,855  $103   0%
Acquired Properties  7,228   2,611   4,617   177%
Expanded Properties  1,010   865   145   17%
Sold Properties  52   105   (53)  (50%)
Corporate Office  230   234   (4)  (2%)
Total $51,478  $46,670  $4,808   10%

The increase in depreciation expense is mainly due to the newly acquired properties.


Interest Expense, excluding Amortization of Financing Costs ($ in thousands)
 2021  2020  $ Change  % Change 
Same Properties $26,215  $28,579  $(2,364)  (8%)
Acquired Properties  6,085   2,465   3,620   147%
Expanded Properties  670   720   (50)  (7%)
Sold Properties  170   69   101   146%
Loans Payable  3,356   3,130   226   7%
Total $36,496  $34,963  $1,533   4%

The increase in interest expense was mainly due to the increase in Acquired Properties due to two new loans totaling $104.0 million for properties acquired in Plain City (Columbus), OH and Locust Grove (Atlanta), GA. The decrease in Same Properties was mainly due to the reduction in the outstanding fixed rate mortgage balances related to these properties. The outstanding fixed rate mortgage balances related to these properties was reduced due to regularly scheduled principal amortization payments made during fiscal 2021, including the repayment of four mortgage loans for our properties located in Kansas City, MO, Topeka, KS, Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ and Houston, TX. These four loans were at a weighted average interest rate of 5.35%. The weighted average interest rate on our fixed rate debt decreased from 3.98% as of September 30, 2020 to 3.86% as of September 30, 2021. In addition, the increase in interest expense for Sold Properties is due to a $134,000 prepayment penalty included in interest expense that was incurred when the mortgage was paid off in connection with the sale of the property located in Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ. The increase in interest expense for Loans Payable is due to a $175.0 million increase in the outstanding Loan Payable balance ($90.0 million was drawn down during the third quarter of fiscal 2021 and $85.0 million was drawn down during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021) from September 30, 2020 to September 30, 2021 offset by a decrease in the weighted average interest rate from 2.92% as of September 30, 2020 to 1.95% as of September 30, 2021.

44
Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $421,000, or 5%, during fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020. The increase was primarily due to purchasing a Director & Officer Insurance Policy and an increase in Franchise Taxes. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of gross revenue, (which includes Rental Revenue, Reimbursement Revenue and Dividend Income), remained flat at 5.0% for fiscal year 2021 and 2020. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation), decreased by 7.5% to 37 basis points from 40 basis points for the fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs

During the fiscal year 2021, we incurred Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs of $35.9 million related to the strategic alternatives review process approved by our Board of Directors, our proposed merger with EQC and the related shareholder meeting and proxy processes, the termination of the EQC merger agreement (including reimbursement of certain transaction expenses incurred by EQC), the Release and Settlement Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement with our former general counsel and Blackwells.

Dividend Income

Many REITs reduced their dividends in 2020 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Dividend Income decreased $4.3 million, or 41%, during fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020. This decrease is due to reduced dividends from our REIT securities portfolio. The REIT securities portfolio’s weighted average yield was approximately 4.5% during fiscal 2021 as compared to 6.4% for fiscal 2020. We held $143.5 million in marketable REIT securities as of September 30, 2021, representing 5.6% of our undepreciated assets.

Preferred Dividend Expense

Preferred Dividend Expense increased $6.9 million, or 26%, during fiscal 2021 as compared to fiscal 2020. This increase is due to the 3.1 million shares we sold of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock under the Preferred Stock ATM Program during the first quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 at a weighted average price of $24.88 per share which generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of $76.0 million.

Comparison of Year Ended September 30, 2020 to Year Ended September 30, 2019

The following tables summarize our rental revenue, reimbursement revenue, real estate taxes, operating expenses, and depreciation expense by category. For the purposes of the following discussion, Same Properties are properties owned as of October 1, 2018 that have not been subsequently expanded properties.or sold.

Reimbursement Revenues 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $19,056,041  $17,259,734  $1,796,307   10%
Acquired Properties  3,048,604   285,207   2,763,397   969%
Expanded Properties  837,855   750,966   86,889   12%
Sold Properties  355,230   429,620   (74,390)  (17%)
Total $23,297,730  $18,725,527  $4,572,203   24%

Acquired Properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to September 30, 2018. Eight properties were acquired during fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019. Acquired Properties include the properties located in Trenton, NJ; Savannah, GA and Lafayette, IN (all acquired in fiscal 2019) and Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN; Lancaster (Columbus),OH; Whitsett (Greensboro), NC; Ogden (Salt Lake City), UT and Oklahoma City, OK (all acquired in fiscal 2020).

Expanded Properties include properties that were expanded subsequent to September 30, 2018. During fiscal 2020 and 2019, there was one property expansion completed at the property located in Monroe (Cincinnati), OH.

As of September 30, 2020 and 2019, the overall occupancy rate of our total property portfolio was 99.4% and 98.9%, respectively.


Rental Revenues ($ in thousands)
 2020  2019  $ Change  % Change 
Same Properties $123,882  $123,821  $61   0%
Acquired Properties  15,653   7,073   8,580   121%
Expanded Properties  2,048   1,630   418   26%
Total $141,583  $132,524  $9,059   7%

45
Table of Contents

The increase in rental revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly Acquired Properties and Expanded Properties.

Reimbursement Revenues ($ in thousands) 2020  2019  $ Change  % Change 
Same Properties $24,443  $21,925  $2,518   11%
Acquired Properties  1,750   358   1,392   389%
Expanded Properties  41   14   27   193%
Total $26,234  $22,297  $3,937   18%

Our single tenantsingle-tenant properties are subject to net leases, which require the tenants to absorb the real estate taxes, insurance and the majority of the repairs and maintenance. As such, we are reimbursed by the tenants for these expenses. Therefore, the increase in reimbursement revenues is offset by the increase in Real Estate Taxes and the increase in Operating Expenses, which includes insurance, repairs and maintenance and other operating expenses. In addition, the increase in reimbursement revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties.Acquired Properties. The increase in reimbursement revenues from Same Properties is due to the increase in Same Properties real estate taxes and operating expenses reimbursed to useus from our tenants. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, Reimbursement Revenue as a percentage of Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses was 96.8% and 95.0%, respectively.

Real Estate Taxes 2018 2017 $ Change % Change 
         

Real Estate Taxes ($ in thousands)
 2020 2019 $ Change % Change 
Same Properties $15,274,719  $14,021,691  $1,253,028   9% $18,571  $16,658  $1,913   11%
Acquired Properties  2,314,184   183,102   2,131,082   1164%  1,622   352   1,270   361%
Expanded Properties  795,408   710,196   85,212   12%  -0-   -0-   -0-   0%
Sold Properties  211,928   351,645   (139,717)  (40)%
Total $18,596,239  $15,266,634  $3,329,605   22% $20,193  $17,010  $3,183   19%

43
Table of Contents

The increase in real estate taxes is mainly due to the newly acquired properties. The increase from same properties is mainly due to an increase in assessment values.values from Same Properties, which were mostly billed back to the tenants and offset the increase in the Reimbursement Revenues from Same Properties. Additionally, the increase is due to the newly Acquired Properties.

Operating Expenses 2018 2017 $ Change % Change 
         
Operating Expenses ($ in thousands) 2020 2019 $ Change % Change 
Same Properties $4,791,211  $4,410,009  $381,202   9% $6,789  $6,402  $387   6%
Acquired Properties  789,115   124,946   664,169   532%  113   42   71   169%
Expanded Properties  103,660   88,025   15,635   18%  17   20   (3)  (15%)
Sold Properties  109,892   264,942   (155,050)  (59%)
Total $5,793,878  $4,887,922  $905,956   19% $6,919  $6,464  $455   7%

The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to the repair and maintenance at Same Properties, which were mostly billed back to the tenants and offset the increase in the Reimbursement Revenues from Same Properties. Additionally, the increase is due to the newly acquired properties.Acquired Properties.

Net Operating Income (NOI)* 2018 2017 $ Change % Change 
         

Net Operating Income (NOI)* ($ in thousands)
 2020 2019 $ Change % Change 
Same Properties $83,566,781  $83,733,452  $(166,671)  0% $122,995  $122,687  $308   0%
Acquired Properties  26,438,218   7,063,623   19,374,595   274%  15,668   7,037   8,631   123%
Expanded Properties  4,159,745   3,998,426   161,319   4%  2,042   1,623   419   26%
Sold Properties  606,988   1,435,248   (828,260)  (58%)
Total $114,771,732  $96,230,749  $18,540,983   19% $140,705  $131,347  $9,358   7%

The increase in NOI is mainly due to the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.Acquired Properties.

* The revenue and expense items related to property operations discussed above are components of NOI which are recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses. NOI is a non-GAAP performance measure. See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Overview” for a reconciliation of our Net Operating Income to our Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders.

Depreciation 2018  2017  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $25,695,488  $25,607,021  $88,467   0%
Acquired Properties  9,223,271   2,399,641   6,823,630   284%
Expanded Properties  1,218,756   1,157,830   60,926   5%
Sold Properties  38,408   470,506   (432,098)  (92%)
Total $36,175,923  $29,634,998  $6,540,925   22%
46
Table of Contents

Depreciation ($ in thousands) 2020  2019  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $40,189  $39,554  $635   2%
Acquired Properties  5,740   2,550   3,190   125%
Expanded Properties  508   414   94   23%
Corporate Office  233   502   (269)  (54%)
Total $46,670  $43,020  $3,650   8%

The increase in depreciation expense is mainly due to the newly acquired properties.

Interest Expense, excluding Amortization of Financing Costs 2018 2017 $ Change % Change 
         

Interest Expense, excluding Amortization of Financing Costs ($ in thousands)
 2020 2019 $ Change % Change 
Same Properties $16,344,050  $19,032,723  $(2,688,673)  (14%) $25,313  $27,569  ($2,256)  (8%)
Acquired Properties  9,368,794   2,156,392   7,212,402   334%  6,019   2,583   3,436   133%
Expanded Properties  509,024   588,191   (79,167)  (13%)  501   262   239   91%
Sold Properties  38,272   143,510   (105,238)  (73%)
Loans Payable  4,868,582   2,599,046   2,269,536   87%  3,130   5,245   (2,115)  (40%)
Total $31,128,722  $24,519,862  $6,608,860   27% $34,963  $35,659  $(696)  (2%)

The increasedecrease in interest expense iswas mainly due to the decrease in Same Properties and the decrease in Loans Payable which was partially offset with the increase in Acquired Properties due to the new loans obtained in connection with the acquisition of new properties. Interest expense for same properties decreasedThe decrease in Same Properties was mainly due to the reduction in the outstanding fixed rate mortgage balancebalances related to these properties. The outstanding fixed rate mortgage balancebalances related to these properties was reduced mainly due to the payoff of five fixed rate mortgage loans totaling approximately $12,487,000 and regularly scheduled principal amortization payments made during fiscal 2018.2020, including the repayment of two self-amortizing mortgage loans for our properties located in Augusta, GA and Huntsville, AL. These two loans were at a weighted average interest rate of 5.52%. In addition, the weighted average interest rate on our fixed rate debt decreased from 4.18%4.03% as of September 30, 20172019 to 4.07%3.98% as of September 30, 2018.

44
Table of Contents

Acquisition Costs

Acquisition costs that were expensed2020. The decrease in the Consolidated Statement of Income decreased $178,526, or 100% during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, effective as of April 1, 2017, as permitted under the standard, we no longer accountinterest expense for our property acquisitions as business combinations and instead we account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets. In an acquisition of assets, certain acquisition costs are capitalized to real estate investments as part of the purchase price as opposed to being expensed as Acquisition Costs under the accounting treatment for business combinations previously used. Therefore, as of April 1, 2017, we no longer expensed any Acquisition Costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $967,033, or 12%, during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in salaries and director fees which wereLoans Payable is due to a combination of increasesa $20.0 million decrease in wage rates and headcount of employeesthe outstanding Loan Payable balance from September 30, 2019 to September 30, 2020 and a combinationdecrease in the interest rate from 3.74% as of increasesSeptember 30, 2019 to 2.92% as of September 30, 2020.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased $149,000, or 2%, during fiscal 2020 as compared to fiscal 2019. The decrease was primarily due to employee headcount reduction and a decrease in director fees and headcount of directors.travel expenses. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of gross revenue, (which includes Rental Revenue, Reimbursement Revenue and Dividend and Interest Income), decreased by 8%6% to 5.8%5.0% for fiscal year 20182020 from 6.3%5.3% for fiscal year 2017.2019. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation), decreased by 4%7% to 4640 basis points from 4843 basis points for the fiscal years 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.

Non-recurring Severance Expense

On December 23, 2019, our former General Counsel, announced her retirement effective December 31, 2019. In connection with her severance package, during the first quarter of fiscal 2020, we incurred a one-time, Non-recurring Severance Expense of $786,000.

Dividend and Interest Income

Many REITs reduced their dividends in 2020 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Dividend and Interest Income increased $6,189,901,decreased $4.7 million, or 89%31%, during fiscal 20182020 as compared to fiscal 2017.2019. This decrease is mainlydue to reduced dividends from our REIT securities portfolio. The REIT securities portfolio’s weighted average yield was approximately 6.4% during fiscal 2020 as compared to 8.5% for fiscal 2019. We held $108.8 million in marketable REIT securities as of September 30, 2020, representing 4.9% of our undepreciated assets.

47
Table of Contents

Preferred Dividend Expense

Preferred Dividend Expense increased $7.7 million, or 41%, during fiscal 2020 as compared to fiscal 2019. This increase is due to the higher average carrying value5.0 million shares we sold of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock under the REIT securities portfolioPreferred Stock ATM Program during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 as compared to during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017. In addition, the REIT securities portfolio earned2020 at a higher weighted average yieldprice of approximately 9.5% during fiscal 2018 as compared to 7.7% for fiscal 2017.

Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net

Realized gain on sales of securities transactions, net consisted of the following:

  2018  2017 
       
Gross realized gains $112,272  $2,320,561 
Gross realized losses  (885)  (8,847)
Total Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net $111,387  $2,311,714 

We had an accumulated net unrealized loss on our securities portfolio of $24,744,579 as of September 30, 2018.

Comparison of Year Ended September 30, 2017 to Year Ended September 30, 2016

The following tables summarize our rental revenue, reimbursement revenue, real estate taxes, operating expenses, and depreciation expense by category. For the purposes of the following discussion, same properties are properties owned as of October 1, 2015 that have not been subsequently expanded or sold.

Acquired Properties are properties that were acquired subsequent to September 30, 2015. Eighteen properties were acquired during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016. Acquired properties include the properties located in Concord (Charlotte), NC; Covington (New Orleans), LA; Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA; Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA; Colorado Springs, CO; Louisville, KY; Davenport (Orlando), FL and Olathe (Kansas City), KS (all acquired in fiscal 2016) and Hamburg (Buffalo), NY; Ft. Myers, FL; Walker (Grand Rapids), MI; Mesquite (Dallas), TX; Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC; Homestead (Miami), FL; Oklahoma City, OK; Concord (Charlotte), NC; Kenton, OH and Stow, OH (all acquired in fiscal 2017).

45
Table of Contents

During fiscal 2017 and 2016, there were five property expansions completed at the properties located in Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS; Huntsville, AL; Tampa, FL (FedEx Ground); Edinburg, TX and Ft. Myers, FL. Expanded Properties include these properties that were expanded subsequent to September 30, 2015, with the exception of the property located in Ft. Myers, FL. Since this property was acquired in fiscal 2017 and subsequently expanded, it is therefore included in Acquired Properties instead of being included in Expanded Properties.

Sold property consists of one property located in White Bear Lake (Minneapolis/St. Paul), MN that was sold on October 27, 2016.

As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, the occupancy rates of our total property portfolio were 99.3% and 99.6%, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on November 1, 2017, we leased our previously vacant 36,270 square foot facility located in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA for 10.2 years which increased our current occupancy rate to 99.5%.

Rental Revenues 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $70,047,915  $70,082,404  $(34,489)  (0%)
Acquired Properties  21,360,523   6,573,225   14,787,298   225%
Expanded Properties  6,251,340   4,936,800   1,314,540   27%
Sold Property  -0-   -0-   -0-   0%
Total $97,659,778  $81,592,429  $16,067,349   20%

The increase in rental revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.

Reimbursement Revenues 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $15,204,496  $14,343,308  $861,188   6%
Acquired Properties  2,476,183   862,919   1,613,264   187%
Expanded Properties  1,017,657   956,777   60,880   6%
Sold Property  27,191   -0-   27,191   -0- 
Total $18,725,527  $16,163,004  $2,562,523   16%

Our single tenant properties are subject to net leases, which require the tenants to absorb the real estate taxes, insurance and the majority of the repairs and maintenance. As such, we are reimbursed by the tenants for these expenses. Therefore, the increase in reimbursement revenues is offset by the increase in Real Estate Taxes and the increase in Operating Expenses, which includes insurance, repairs and maintenance and other operating expenses. In addition, the increase in reimbursement revenues is mainly due to the increase from the newly acquired properties.

Real Estate Taxes 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $12,493,623  $11,713,809  $779,814   7%
Acquired Properties  2,090,454   804,831   1,285,623   160%
Expanded Properties  673,702   660,994   12,708   2%
Sold Property  8,855   115,090   (106,235)  (92%)
Total $15,266,634  $13,294,724  $1,971,910   15%

46
Table of Contents

The increase in real estate taxes is mainly due to the newly acquired properties. The increase from same properties is mainly due to an increase in assessment values.

Operating Expenses 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $3,900,093  $3,795,817  $104,276   3%
Acquired Properties  506,964   92,184   414,780   450%
Expanded Properties  348,491   343,029   5,462   2%
Sold Property  132,374   42,869   89,505   209%
Total $4,887,922  $4,273,899  $614,023   14%

The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to the newly acquired properties.

Net Operating Income (NOI)* 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $68,858,695  $68,916,086  $(57,391)  (0%)
Acquired Properties  21,239,288   6,539,129   14,700,159   225%
Expanded Properties  6,246,804   4,889,554   1,357,250   28%
Sold Property  (114,038)  (157,959)  43,921   28%
Total $96,230,749  $80,186,810  $16,043,939   20%

The increase in NOI is mainly due to the newly acquired properties and expanded properties.

* The revenue and expense items related to property operations discussed above are components of NOI which are recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses. NOI is a non-GAAP performance measure. See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Overview” for a reconciliation of our Net Operating Income to our Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders.

Depreciation 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $20,846,253  $20,554,181  $292,072   1%
Acquired Properties  7,076,142   2,078,557   4,997,585   240%
Expanded Properties  1,704,597   1,326,210   378,387   29%
Sold Property  8,006   96,074   (88,068)  (92%)
Total $29,634,998  $24,055,022  $5,579,976   23%

The increase in depreciation expense is mainly due to the newly acquired and expanded properties.

Interest Expense, excluding Amortization of Financing Costs 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change 
             
Same Properties $13,264,189  $16,408,865  $(3,144,676)  (19%)
Acquired Properties  7,406,520   1,805,226   5,601,294   310%
Expanded Properties  1,250,107   991,826   258,281   26%
Sold Property  -0-   -0-   -0-   0%
Loans Payable  2,599,046   2,630,894   (31,848)  (1%)
Total $24,519,862  $21,836,811  $2,683,051   12%

The increase in interest expense is mainly due to the acquisition of new properties. Interest expense for same properties decreased mainly due to the reduction in the outstanding fixed rate mortgage balance related to these properties. The outstanding fixed rate mortgage balance related to these properties was reduced mainly due to the payoff of 16 fixed rate mortgage loans totaling approximately $40,037,000 and regularly scheduled principal amortization payments made during fiscal 2017. In addition, the weighted average interest rate on our fixed rate debt decreased from 4.48% as of September 30, 2016 to 4.18% as of September 30, 2017.

47
Table of Contents

Acquisition Costs

Acquisition costs that were expensed in the Consolidated Statement of Income decreased $551,915, or 76% during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, effective as of April 1, 2017, as permitted under the standard, we no longer account for our property acquisitions as business combinations and instead we account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets. In an acquisition of assets, certain acquisition costs are capitalized to real estate investments as part of the purchase price as opposed to being expensed as Acquisition Costs under the accounting treatment for business combinations previously used. Therefore, as of April 1, 2017, we no longer are required to expense our Acquisition Costs. Two properties totaling approximately $56,102,000 were acquired during the first half of fiscal 2017, prior to April 1, 2017 and eight properties totaling approximately $210,747,000 were acquired during fiscal 2016.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased $126,578, or 2%, during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. The decrease in fiscal 2017 was partially due to a one-time $400,000 cash signing bonus granted to the President and Chief Executive Officer in accordance with his amended employment agreement during fiscal 2016 and due to a one-time $100,000 severance payment made to a former employee during fiscal 2016. Additionally, during fiscal 2016, the Founder and Chairman of the Board was granted a discretionary award of 40,000 shares of restricted stock which vest in equal annual installments over the next five years and has a grant date fair value of $13.64$25.04 per share for a total grant date fair valuewhich generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of $545,600. Since the Founder and Chairman of the Board is of retirement age, the entire fair value of the grant was fully expensed on the grant date during fiscal 2016. These one-time fiscal 2016 expenses were partially offset by increases in all employees’ wage rates and professional fees incurred during fiscal 2017. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of gross revenue, (which includes Rental Revenue, Reimbursement Revenue and Dividend and Interest Income), decreased by 18% to 6.3% for fiscal year 2017 from 7.7% for fiscal year 2016. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation), decreased by 17% to 48 basis points from 58 basis points for the fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively.$122.4 million.

Dividend and Interest Income

Dividend and Interest Income increased $1,314,172, or 23%, during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. This is mainly due to the higher average carrying value of the REIT securities portfolio during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as compared to during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The REIT securities portfolio weighted average yield for fiscal 2017 was approximately 7.7% as compared to 8.0% for fiscal 2016.

Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net

Realized gain on sales of securities transactions, net consisted of the following:

  2017  2016 
       
Gross realized gains $2,320,561  $4,403,724 
Gross realized losses  (8,847)  (5,125)
Total Realized Gain on Sales of Securities Transactions, net $2,311,714  $4,398,599 

We had an accumulated net unrealized gain on our securities portfolio of $6,570,565 as of September 30, 2017.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.

48
Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2018:

Contractual

Obligations

 

Total

  Less than
one year
  

1-3 years

  

3-5 years

  More than
5 years
 
                
Mortgage Notes Payable $719,768,355  $60,151,223  $98,703,799  $122,553,702  $438,359,631 
Interest on Mortgage Notes Payable  196,867,159   28,039,774   49,122,612   39,168,341   80,536,432 
Loans Payable (1)  186,608,676   76,608,676   110,000,000   -0-   -0- 
Interest on Loans Payable  8,650,600   4,360,600   4,290,000   -0-   -0- 
Purchase of Properties  153,995,275   113,081,132   40,914,143   -0-   -0- 
Expansions of Existing Properties  6,855,608   6,855,608   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Operating Lease Obligation  439,788   134,446   271,376   33,966   -0- 
Retirement Benefits  600,000   50,000   50,000   -0-   500,000 
Total $1,273,785,461  $289,281,459  $303,351,930  $161,756,009  $519,396,063 

(1)On October 9, 2018, the total Loans Payable outstanding balance was reduced to $110,000,000.

                Mortgage notes payable represents the principal amounts outstanding by scheduled maturity as of September 30, 2018. Interest is payable on these mortgages at fixed rates ranging from 3.45% to 7.60%, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.07%. As of September 30, 2018, the weighted average loan maturity of the mortgage notes payable is 11.7 years. This compares to a weighted average interest rate of 4.18% as of September 30, 2017 and a weighted average loan maturity of the mortgage notes payable of 11.6 years as of September 30, 2017. The Mortgage Notes Payable in the above table does not include one 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%, which was obtained subsequent to the 2018 fiscal yearend in connection with the purchase of one property for $85,248,352. The cost of these acquisitions, purchased subsequent to yearend, is included in the Purchase of Properties in the above table.

As of September 30, 2018, Loans Payable represented the amount drawn down on our $200,000,000 unsecured line of credit facility (the “Facility”) in the amount of $160,000,000 and the amount drawn down on our margin line of credit from our marketable securities in the amount of $26,608,676. The Facility matures in September 2020 with a one-year extension at our option (subject to various conditions as specified in the loan agreement). During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, we had net draws of $50,000,000 under the Facility. Availability under the Facility is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a capitalization rate to the NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Effective, March 22, 2018, the capitalization rate applied to our NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties was lowered from 7.0% to 6.5%, thus increasing the value of the borrowing base properties under the terms of the agreement. Borrowings under the Facility, will, at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140 basis points to 220 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 40 basis points to 120 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Our borrowings as of September 30, 2018, based on our leverage ratio as of September 30, 2018, bear interest at LIBOR plus 170 basis points, which was at an interest rate of 3.90% as of September 30, 2018. In addition, we have a $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability under the Facility (subject to various conditions as specified in the loan agreement) up to $300,000,000. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility which reduced our amount outstanding under the Facility to $110,000,000.

We also invest in equity marketable securities of other REITs, which provides us with additional diversification, liquidity, and income, and serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available. From time to time, we may purchase these securities on margin when the interest and dividend yields exceed the cost of funds. In general, we may borrow up to 50% of the value of the marketable securities, which was $154,920,545 as of September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, we had borrowings of $26,608,676 under our margin line, bearing interest at 2.75%. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

49
Table of Contents

The contractual obligation for the Interest on Loans Payable amount is determined using an interest rate of 3.90% on the amount drawn down on the Facility of $160,000,000 through October 9, 2018 and $110,000,000 thereafter and is determined using an interest rate of 2.75% for interest on the amount drawn down on the margin loan through the date it was paid off on October 9, 2018.

Purchase of properties represents commitments we had entered into as of September 30, 2018 to purchase three industrial properties totaling approximately 745,000 square feet. One of the three properties, amounting to approximately $85,248,000 and totaling approximately 347,000 square feet, was acquired subsequent to our fiscal yearend. We expect to close on the two remaining properties, amounting to approximately $68,747,000 and approximately 398,000 square feet, during fiscal 2019 and 2020, subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements.

Expansions of existing properties represent the remaining costs expected to be incurred as of September 30, 2018 in connection with a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Ft. Mill, SC and for a 154,800 square foot building expansion for a property lease to UGN, Inc. located in Monroe, OH. The expansion at the property located in Ft. Mill, SC was substantially completed on September 27, 2018 for a cost of approximately $1,834,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from October 2023 to August 2028. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $183,000 from approximately $1,415,000, or $8.00 per square foot to approximately $1,598,000, or $9.03 per square foot. The expansion at the property located in Monroe, OH is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2019 for a total project cost of approximately $9,072,000, which will result in a new 15 year lease which will extend the prior lease expiration date from February 2030 to January 2034. In addition, the expansion will result in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion by approximately $862,000 from approximately $961,000, or $4.14 per square foot, to approximately $1,823,000, or $4.71 per square foot. In addition, the annual rent will increase 2% per annum.

Operating lease obligation represents the lease for our current 5,680 square foot corporate office located in Freehold, NJ which is leased through December 2021.

Retirement Benefits of $600,000 represent the total future amount to be paid, on an undiscounted basis, relating to one executive officer, Mr. Eugene W. Landy, the Founder and Chairman of the Board. These benefits are based upon a specific employment agreement. The agreement does not require us to separately fund the obligation and therefore these amounts will be paid from our general assets. We have accrued these benefits on a present value basis over the term of the employment agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We operate as a REIT deriving our income primarily from real estate rental operations. Our shareholders’ equity increased $57.1 million from $712,865,696$1.04 billion as of September 30, 20172020 to $797,905,767$1.09 billion as of September 30, 2018,2021. Our shareholders’ equity increased due to Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders of $44.8 million, the issuance of 5,816,44388,000 shares of common stock in the amountfor total proceeds of $90,028,789$1.4 million through the DRIP, stock compensation expense of $433,895,$287,000, exercise of stock options consisting of 40,000189,000 shares for total proceeds of $569,600, Net Income Attributable to common shareholders of $38,815,344$2.4 million and the issuance of 1,648,5563.1 million shares of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock issued in connection with the Preferred Stock ATM Program for total proceeds, net of offering costs, in the amount of approximately $40,094,000. The$76.0 million and a net decrease in unrealized loss on change in fair value of our interest rate swap agreement of $2.1 million. These increases were partially offset by payments of cash distributions paid to common shareholders of $53,586,063 and the net decrease in unrealized gains/loss on investments of $31,315,144. See further discussion below.$69.8 million.

Our ability to generate cash adequate to meet our needs is dependent primarily on income from our real estate investments, andas well as our securities portfolio, the sale of real estate investments and securities, refinancing of mortgage debt, leveraging of real estate investments, availability of bank borrowings, proceeds from the DRIP, proceeds from the Preferred Stock ATM Program, proceeds from public offerings and private placements of additional common or preferred stock or other securities, and access to the capital markets. Purchases of new properties, payments of expenses related to real estate operations, capital improvement programs, debt service, general and administrative expenses, and distribution requirements place demands on our liquidity.

50
Table of Contents

We intend to operate our properties from the cash flows generated by our properties. However, our expenses are affected by various factors, including inflation. Increases in operating expenses are predominantly borne by the tenant. To the extent that these increases cannot be passed on through rent reimbursements, these increases will reduce the amount of available cash flow which can adversely affect the market value of the property.

As of September 30, 2018, we had $9,324,585 in Cash and Cash Equivalents and $154,920,545 in marketable securities. In addition, as of September 30, 2018, we had $40,000,000 available under our Facility. The Facility provides for up to $200,000,000 in available borrowings with a $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $300,000,000, subject to certain conditions. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility, which reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.

We have been raising equity capital throughused a variety of sources to fund our DRIP, Preferred Stock ATM Program, registered direct placements, the public sale of common and preferred stock and throughcash needs in addition to our free cash flow generated from our investments in net-leased industrial properties. In the past, we considered selling marketable securities from our investment portfolio, borrowing on our unsecured line of credit facility or securities margin loans, finance or refinance debt, or raising capital through registered direct placements, and public offerings of common and preferred stock. We believe thatthese sources of funds generated from operations, the DRIP, the Preferred Stock ATM Program and bank borrowings, together with the ability to finance and refinance our properties, will provide sufficient funds to adequately meet our obligations over the next few years.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, in October 2018, we completed a public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $132,339,000.

As of September 30, 2018,2021, we owned 111122 properties, of which 6160 are subject to fixed rate mortgages. On August 27, 2015, we obtained an unsecured revolving lineWe have a New Facility consisting of credit (the “Facility”). The Facility is syndicated with three banks led by BMO, as sole lead arrangera $225.0 million Revolver and sole book runner, Bank of Montreal as administrative agent, and includes JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (J.P. Morgan) and RBC Capital Markets (RBC) as co-syndication agents. The Facility provided for up to $130,000,000a $75.0 million Term Loan, resulting in available borrowings with a $70,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $200,000,000, subject to certain conditions. The Facility was set to mature in August 2019under both the Revolver and had a one-year extension option, at our option. On September 30, 2016, we entered intothe Term Loan of $300.0 million. In addition, the Revolver includes an amendment to the Facility (the Amendment), pursuant to which we exercised the $70,000,000 accordion feature under the Facility, bringing the maximum availability under the Facility to $200,000,000, and amended the Facility to provide an additional $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringingthat will allow the total potential availability upunder the New Facility to $300,000,000, subjectfurther increase to certain conditions, including, without limitation, obtaining commitments from additional lenders. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity date of the Facility from August 27, 2019 to September 30, 2020, with a one-year extension option, at our option, subject to$400.0 million, under certain conditions. Availability under the New Facility is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The valueAs of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a capitalization rate to the NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Effective, March 22, 2018, the capitalization rate applied to our NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties was lowered from 7.0% to 6.5%, thus increasing the value of the borrowing base propertiesSeptember 30, 2021, we have $175.0 million drawn down under the terms of the agreement. BorrowingsRevolver and we have $75.0 million outstanding under the Facility, will, at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140 basis points to 220 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 40 basis points to 120 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Our borrowingsTerm Loan. In addition, as of September 30, 2018, based on our leverage ratio as of September 30, 2018, bear interest at LIBOR plus 170 basis points, which was at an interest rate of 3.90% as of September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, $160,000,000 was drawn down under the Facility. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018,2021, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility which reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.had $48.6 million in Cash and Cash Equivalents and $143.5 million in marketable securities.

We also may use margin loans from time to time for purchasing securities, for temporary funding of acquisitions, and for working capital purposes. At September 30, 2021 and 2020, there were no amounts drawn down under the margin loan. The interest rate charged on the margin loans is the bank’s margin rate and was 2.75% and 2.05% as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.is 0.75%. The margin loans are due on demand and are collateralized by our securities portfolio. We must maintain a coverage ratio of approximately 50%. At September 30, 2018 and 2017, there was $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 outstanding under the margin loans, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

5148
Table of Contents

Our focus is on real estate investments. We have historically financed purchases of real estate primarily through long-term, fixed rate, amortizing mortgages.

During fiscal 2018,2021, we purchased sevenfour industrial properties totaling approximately 2,655,0001.6 million square feet situated on 316.2 acres resulting in a very expansive land to building ratio of 8.8 to 1. All four properties are leased to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries, with net-leased terms ranging from 1015 to 1520 years, resulting in a weighted average lease maturity of 11.417.1 years. Approximately 2,255,000Three of the four properties, consisting of 903,000 square feet, or 85%58% of the total square footage of the four properties, purchased, are leased to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries, of which, approximately 761,000 square feet, or 29%, is leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX) or FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., a subsidiary of FDX.FedEx Corporation (FDX). The aggregate purchase price for the sevenfour properties was approximately $282,332,000.$258.4 million. These four properties are located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Oklahomathe following Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs): Columbus, OH, Atlanta, GA, Burlington, VT and South Carolina.Knoxville, TN. These sevenfour properties are expected to generate annualized rental income over the life of their leases of approximately $17,414,000.$15.2 million. In connection with two of the sevenfour properties acquired during the 20182021 fiscal year, we entered into fourone 17 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan and one 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan. In connection with the remaining two properties acquired during the 2021 fiscal year, we entered into commitments for two, 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loans, two 14 yearwhich have not yet closed. These four fully-amortizing mortgage loans and one 10 year loan amortizing over 18have a weighted average term of 15.7 years. The sevenprincipal amount of the four mortgage loans originally totaled $175,160,000$161.8 million with an original weighted average mortgage loan maturity of 14.1 years andfixed interest rates ranging from 2.50% to 3.25%, resulting in a weighted average fixed interest rate of 3.91%2.89%.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 19, 2018,27, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 347,145291,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.046.0 acres, located in Trenton, NJ.the Birmingham, AL MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2032.July 2036. The purchase price was $85,248,352.$30.2 million. We obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000$19.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%.2.40% which has not yet closed. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $5,328,000.$1.7 million.

The industrial property purchased thus far during fiscal 2019 increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 21,521,000.

In addition to the $30.2 million property purchased subsequent to our fiscal yearend, as described above, we have entered into agreements to purchase twothree, new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Alabama, Georgia and North Carolina, consisting of approximately 398,000Texas, totaling 1.1 million square feet, withfeet. These future acquisitions have net-leased terms ranging from 10 to 15 years with a weighted average lease term of 13.412.6 years. The total purchase price for these three properties is approximately $68,747,000 and both$126.8 million. Two of these three properties, consisting of an aggregate of 563,000 square feet, or 52% of the total leasable area, are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. All three properties are leased to companies, or subsidiaries of companies, that are considered Investment Grade by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and by Moody’s (www.moodys.com). Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing all three of these transactions during fiscal 2022.

We have several FedEx Ground parking expansion projects in progress with more under discussion. Currently there are nine parking expansion projects underway, which we expect to cost approximately $42.6 million. These parking expansion projects will enable us to capture additional rent while lengthening the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020.  In connection with oneterms of these properties, we have entered into a commitment to obtain a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $17,500,000 with a fixed interest rate of 4.40%.leases. We are also have entered into a commitmentin discussions to expand the parking at eight additional locations bringing the total recently completed and likely future parking lot expansion projects to 18 currently.

Due to the proliferation of ecommerce sales and last mile deliveries, it is important to take into account the large amounts of real estate utilized for trailer, van, and car parking at many of our property locatedproperties in Monroe, OH by 154,800 square feet, increasing the buildingdetermining how our in-place rental rates compare to 387,000 square feet. The expansion is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2019market rental rates for a total project cost of approximately $9,072,000, which will resultproperties being used in a new 15 year lease which will extend the prior lease expiration date from February 2030 to January 2034. In addition, the expansion will result in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion by approximately $862,000 from approximately $961,000, or $4.14similar manner. Rents per square foot on properties that may be nearby, but have only limited acreage devoted to approximately $1,823,000, or $4.71 per square foot. In addition,parking, are poor comparisons as they cannot accommodate the annual rent will increase 2% per annum. same tenant needs.

We may makehave additional acquisitions and expansions in fiscal 20192022 and fiscal 2020,2023, and the funds for these acquisitions and expansions may come from funds generated from operations, mortgages, draws on our unsecured line of credit facility, cash on hand, sale of marketable securities, other bank borrowings, proceeds from the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP), proceeds from the At-The-Market Preferred Equity Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program),DRIP and proceeds from private placements and public offerings of additional common or preferred stock or other securities. To the extent that funds or appropriate properties are not available, fewer acquisitions will be made.

49
Table of Contents

We also invest in marketable securities of other REITs as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available, for liquidity, and for additional income.REITs. We generally limit our marketable securities investmentsthe size of this portfolio to no more than approximately 10%5% of our undepreciated assets, (which is ourwhich we define as total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). From timedepreciation. Our REIT securities portfolio provides us with diversification, income, and is a source of potential liquidity when needed. We normally hold REIT securities long-term and have the ability and intent to time, we may purchasehold these securities on margin when there is an adequate yield spread.to recovery. During fiscal 2018,2021, our securities portfolio increased $31,155,775,$34.7 million, mainly due to purchases of $64,979,698 offset by the decreaseincrease in the net unrealized lossgain of $31,315,144 and the sale of securities with a cost of $2,508,779. We recognized gains on sales of securities of $111,387 in$50.2 million. In addition, to earning Dividend and Interest Income of $13,120,465 during fiscal 2018.2021, our securities portfolio earned dividend income of $6.2 million. In general, we may borrow up to 50% of the value of the marketable securities, which was $154,920,545$143.5 million as of September 30, 2018.2021. As of September 30, 2018,2021, we haddid not have any borrowings of $26,608,676 under our margin line, bearing interest at 2.75%. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.line.

52
Table of Contents

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $85,529,162, $73,867,866$84.8 million, $98.9 million and $54,699,500$100.7 million for fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The increasedecrease in cash flows provided from operating activities from fiscal 20172020 to fiscal 2018 and from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 20172021 is primarily due to the increasedNon-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs of $35.9 million offset from an increase in cash from income generated from acquisitions of propertiesproperties. The slight decrease in cash flows provided from operating activities from fiscal 2019 to fiscal 2020 is primarily due to a $4.0 million decrease in cash collected from tenant and expanded operations.other receivables due to the timing of billings and a $2.8 million increase in cash used for other assets and capitalized lease costs, mostly offset from an increase in cash from income generated from acquisitions of properties.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $332,513,200, $339,071,013$237.8 million, $180.7 million and $227,845,089$213.6 million for fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The increase in Cash flows used in investing activities infrom fiscal 2018 decreased2021 as compared to 20172020 was mainly due mainly to a decrease in the purchase of real estate and purchase of securities available for sale. This decrease was offset by an increase in Purchase of Real Estate & Intangible assets offset by proceeds from the saleSale of real estate from the four properties that were sold during fiscal 2018.Securities Available for Sale. The decrease in Cash flows used in investing activities infrom fiscal 2017 increased2020 as compared to 2016 due2019 was mainly to an increase in the purchase of real estate and purchasebecause we did not have any cash purchases of securities available for sale.sale during fiscal 2020, partially offset by an increase in purchase of real estate.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $246,082,577, $179,679,685$178.1 million, $85.2 million and $256,821,188$123.7 million for fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Cash flows from financing activities increased in fiscal 20182021 as compared to 20172020 mainly due to netan increase in Net Draws on Loans Payable of $195.0 million offset by a reduction of $46.4 million decrease in proceeds of $66,517,259 from loans payable and net drawsreceived from the FacilityPreferred Stock ATM program, $18.5 million decrease in proceeds received from the DRIP program, $9.9 million increase in common dividends paid, $7.2 million increase in preferred dividends paid and an increase of $50,000,000.$15.9 million of principal payments in Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable. Cash flows from financing activities decreased in fiscal 20172020 as compared to 20162019 mainly due mainly to the redemptionproceeds received from a common stock offering of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock$132.3 million that was completed in fiscal 2019 and 7.875% Series B Preferred Stocka $38.3 million reduction in dividend reinvestments, partially offset by a $71.6 million reduction on the amount of $110,993,750repayments made towards our loans payable and the payoff of 16 mortgage notes payable in the amount of $40,037,099. This decrease was offset by ana $64.2 million increase in proceeds from mortgage loans in the amount of $35,380,515, the proceedsreceived from the issuance of 4,439,445 shares of the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock with net proceeds of $106,736,978 and net draws from the Facility of $34,000,000.ATM program. In addition, we paid cash dividends (net of reinvestments), of $40,657,707, $36,163,355$68.7 million, $58.8 million and $33,665,037$46.9 million for fiscal 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had total assets of $1,718,377,886$2.2 billion and liabilities of $920,472,119.$1.1 billion. Our total debt to total market capitalization as of September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 was approximately 35%31% and 33%32%, respectively. Our net debt (net of cash and cash equivalents) to total market capitalization as of September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 was approximately 35%30% and 32%31%, respectively. Our net debt, less securities (net of cash and cash equivalents and net of securities) to total market capitalization as of September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 was approximately 29%26% and 26%27%, respectively. As of September 30, 2021, the weighted average loan maturity of our Mortgage Notes Payable was 10.9 years. We believe that we have the ability to meet our obligations and to generate funds for new investments.

We have a DRIP, in which participants can purchase our stock at a price of approximately 95% of market value. Amounts received in connection with the DRIP, (including dividend reinvestments of $12,928,356, $10,125,894$1.0 million, $7.6 million and $8,369,146$16.9 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively) were $90,028,789, $91,931,831$1.4 million, $26.4 million and $72,175,797$74.0 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. In January 2021, when our Board of Directors unanimously decided to explore strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value, the Board also determined to temporarily suspend our DRIP program during this process. Because the exploration of strategic alternative process is still ongoing, the DRIP program remains suspended.

50
Table of Contents

During fiscal 2018,2021, we paid total distributions to holders of our common stock of $53,586,063,$69.8 million, or $0.68$0.71 per common share. Of the dividends paid, $12,928,356$1.0 million was reinvested pursuant to the terms of the DRIP, representing a 24% participation rate.DRIP. On October 1, 2018,2021, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.17$0.18 per share, to be paid on December 17, 2018,15, 2021, to common shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2018,2021, which represents an annualized common dividend rate of $0.68$0.72 per share. We intend to pay these distributions from cash flows from operations.

On January 14, 2021, our Board of Directors approved a 5.9% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.18 per share from $0.17 per share. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.72 per share. This increase represents the third dividend increase in the past five years, representing a total increase of 20%. We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 2730 consecutive years. On October 1, 2015,We are one of the few REITs that maintained our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly common stock cash dividend from $0.15 per share to $0.16 per share representing a 6.7% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. Then again, most recently, on October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly common stock cash dividend and from $0.16 per share to $0.17 per share on October 2, 2017, representing a 6.3% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. These two dividend raises represent a total increase of 13%.throughout the Global Financial Crisis.

53
Table of Contents

Our common stock dividend policy is dependent upon our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, availability and cost of bank financing and other factors considered relevant by the Board of Directors. It is our intention to continue making comparable quarterly distributions in the future and to grow our distributions over time. We anticipate maintaining the annual dividend rate of $0.68 per common share although no assurances can be given since various economic factors may reduce the amount of cash flow available to us for common dividends. All decisions with respect to the payment of dividends are made by our Board of Directors, subject to limitations under our financing arrangements and Maryland law.

During fiscal 2018,2021, we paid $16,876,532$33.0 million in preferred stock dividends and accrued $313,924$396,000 of preferred stock dividends.

On September 13, 2016, we issued 5,400,000 shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock at an offering price of $25.00 per share in an underwritten public offering. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses, of approximately $130,543,000. On October 14, 2016, we used $53,493,750 of the net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of the 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of our 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, we used $498,540 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, up to and including the redemption date of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock.

On March 9, 2017, we issued an additional 3,000,000 shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, at a public offering price of $24.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $73,500,000, before deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses. Net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses, were approximately $71,003,000. On June 7, 2017, we used $57,500,000 of the net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of our 2,300,000 issued and outstanding shares of our 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, we used $75,469 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, up to and not including the redemption date of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock.

On June 29, 2017,November 25, 2020, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or B. Riley (formerly FBR Capital Markets & Co.), that provided for the offer and sale of shares of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, or our 6.125% Series C preferred stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) with B. Riley that providesFBR., or B. Riley, providing for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000up to $150.0 million of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock.Preferred Stock, which replaced a previous Preferred Stock ATM Program entered into on December 4, 2019 (which itself had replaced an earlier Preferred Stock ATM Program).

Sales of shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock under our Preferred Stock ATM Program are in “at the market offerings” as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act, including, without limitation, sales made directly on or through the NYSE, or on any other existing trading market for the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, or to or through a market maker, or any other method permitted by law, including, without limitation, negotiated transactions and block trades. We began selling shares through the first of these programs on July 3, 2017. Since inception through September 30, 2018,2021, we sold 3,088,00113.6 million shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06$24.91 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000,$332.4 million, of which 1,648,5563.1 million shares were sold during the 2021 fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84$24.88 per share, and generatedgenerating net proceeds after offering expenses of approximately $40,094,000. As of September 30, 2018, there is approximately $119,096,000 remaining that may be$76.0 million. No shares were sold underpursuant to the Preferred Stock ATM Program.

As of September 30, 2018, 11,488,001 shares of the 6.125% Series CProgram since December 31, 2020. Our Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.ATM Program has since expired.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, in October 2018, we completed a public offering of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $132,339,000.

We are required to pay cumulative dividends on our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock in the amount of $1.53125 per share per year, which is equivalent to 6.125% of the $25.00 liquidation value per share. As of September 30, 2018,2021, we have a total of 11,488,00122.0 million shares of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock outstanding, representing an aggregate liquidation preference of $287,200,025.$549.6 million.

54
Table of Contents

During fiscal 2020, the Company entered in a Common Stock ATM Program. To date, we have not raised any equity though our Common Stock ATM Program and it has since expired.

During the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, stock options to purchase 40,000189,000 shares were exercised at ana weighted average exercise price of $14.24$12.57 per share for total proceeds of $569,600.$2.4 million.

On an ongoing basis, we fund capital expenditures, primarily to maintain our properties. These expenditures may also include expansions as requested by tenants, or various tenant improvements on properties which are re-tenanted. The amounts of these expenditures can vary from year to year depending on the age of the properties, tenant negotiations, market conditions and lease turnover. Our 111122 properties, totaling approximately 21,174,00024.9 million square feet, have a weighted average building age, based on the square footage of our buildings, of 8.710.2 years.

During the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, we completed a total of seventhree property expansions, consisting of threeone building expansionsexpansion and fourtwo parking lot expansions. Three of the four parking lot expansions included the purchase of additional land. The three building expansionsexpansion resulted in approximately 312,000155,000 additional square feet. Total costs for all seventhree property expansions were approximately $22,189,000$12.9 million and resulted in total increased annual rent of approximately $2,090,000. Six$1.2 million. One of these completed expansions resulted in new ten yearten-year lease extensions for the expanded properties and one completed expansion resulted in a new twelve yearfifteen-year lease extension. The weighted average lease extension for these seventhree property expansions is 10.912.7 years.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, “Leases”. ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 will become effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The most significant changes related to lessor accounting under ASU 2016-02 include bifurcating revenue into lease and non-lease components and the new standard’s narrow definition of initial direct costs for leases. Since our revenue is primarily derived from leasing activities from long-term net leases and since we currently do not capitalize indirect costs for leases, we believe that will continue to account for our leases and related leasing costs in substantially the same manner as we currently do once the adoption of the ASU 2016-02 becomes effective.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases”. The amendment in ASU 2018-10 affects narrow aspects of the guidance issued earlier in ASU 2016-02 by removing certain inconsistencies and providing additional clarification related to the guidance issued earlier. ASU 2018-10 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. These changes became effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. The most significant change for us, once ASU 2016-01 was adopted, was the accounting treatment for our investments in marketable securities that are classified as available for sale. The accounting treatment used for our Consolidated Financial Statements through Fiscal 2018, was that our investments in marketable securities, classified as available for sale, were carried at fair value, with net unrealized holding gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized and the change in net unrealized holding gains and losses being reflected as comprehensive income (loss). Under ASU 2016-01, effective October 1, 2018, these marketable securities continue to be measured at fair value, however the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses are now recognized through net income. Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2018, unrealized net holding losses of $24,744,579 were reclassed to beginning retained earnings to recognize the unrealized losses previously recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets.

5551
Table of Contents

In May 2014,We assess and measure our overall operating results based upon an industry performance measure referred to as Funds From Operations (FFO), which we believe is a useful indicator of our operating performance. FFO is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure of a REIT. FFO, as defined by the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entityNational Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (Nareit), represents net income attributable to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers”. The FASB issued further guidance in ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”, that provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and adds some practical expedients. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The effective date of ASU 2014-09 was extendedcommon shareholders, as defined by one year by ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date”. The new standard is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Therefore, we adopted the standard effective October 1, 2018. Our revenue is primarily derived from leasing activities and historically our property dispositions have been cash sales with no contingencies and no future involvementaccounting principles generally accepted in the property. Since this standard appliesUnited States of America (U.S. GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated real estate assets, impairment charges related to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other guidance,depreciable real estate assets, certain non-cash items such as leases,real estate asset depreciation and amortization, plus our portion of these items related to our consolidated investment that we have a non-controlling interest in. Included in the Nareit FFO White Paper - 2018 Restatement, is an option pertaining to assets incidental to our main business in the calculation of Nareit FFO to make an election to include or exclude mark-to-market changes in the value recognized on these marketable equity securities. In conjunction with the adoption of this standard did notthe FFO White Paper - 2018 Restatement, for all periods presented, we have elected to exclude unrealized gains and losses from our investments in marketable equity securities from our FFO calculation. Nareit created FFO as a non-GAAP supplemental measure of REIT operating performance. Our calculation of Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO) differs from Nareit’s definition of FFO because we exclude certain items that we view as nonrecurring or impacting comparability from period to period. We define AFFO as FFO, excluding stock based compensation expense, depreciation of corporate office tenant improvements, amortization of deferred financing costs, realized gain on sale of securities transactions, lease termination income, non-recurring strategic alternatives & proxy costs, non-recurring severance expense, effect of non-cash U.S. GAAP straight-line rent adjustments and subtracting recurring capital expenditures, plus our portion of these items related to our consolidated investment that we had a non-controlling interest in. We define recurring capital expenditures as all capital expenditures that are recurring in nature, excluding capital expenditures related to expansions at our current locations or capital expenditures that are incurred in conjunction with obtaining a new lease or a lease renewal. We believe that, as widely recognized measures of performance used by other REITs, FFO and AFFO may be considered by investors as supplemental measures to compare our operating performance to those of other REITs. FFO and AFFO exclude historical cost depreciation as an expense and may facilitate the comparison of REITs which have a different cost basis. However, other REITs may use different methodologies to calculate FFO and AFFO and, accordingly, our FFO and AFFO may not be comparable to all other REITs. The items excluded from FFO and AFFO are significant impact oncomponents in understanding our consolidated financial statementsperformance.

FFO and AFFO are non-GAAP performance measures and (i) do not represent Cash Flow from Operations as defined by U.S. GAAP; (ii) should not be considered as an alternative to Net Income or Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders as a measure of operating performance or to Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities; and (iii) are not an alternative to Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities as a measure of liquidity. FFO and AFFO, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other REITs.

The following is a reconciliation of U.S. GAAP Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders to FFO and AFFO for the fiscal years ended September 30th (in thousands):

  2021  2020  2019 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders $44,764  $(48,617) $11,026 
Less/Plus: Unrealized Holding (Gains) Losses Arising During the Periods  (50,239)  77,380   24,680 
Plus: Depreciation Expense (Excluding Corporate Office)  51,223   46,385   42,472 
Plus: Amortization of Intangible Assets  2,339   2,137   1,986 
Plus: Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs  1,256   1,124   972 
Less: Realized Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment (1)  (3,252)  -0-   -0- 
FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders (2)  46,091   78,409   81,136 
Plus: Depreciation of Corporate Office Capitalized Costs  230   234   502 
Plus: Stock Compensation Expense  287   452   784 
Plus: Amortization of Financing Costs  1,365   1,410   1,250 
Plus: Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs  35,920   -0-   -0- 
Plus: Non-recurring Severance Expense  -0-   786   -0- 
Less: Realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (2,248)  -0-   -0- 
Less: Lease Termination Income  (377)  -0-   -0- 
Less: Effect of non-cash U.S. GAAP Straight-line Rent Adjustment  (3,010)  (1,940)  (1,931)
Less: Recurring Capital Expenditures  (1,289)  (2,453)  (2,114)
AFFO Attributable to Common Shareholders $76,969  $76,898  $79,627 

(1)Fiscal 2021 Realized Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment represents our portion of the net realized gain from the sale of our property that we owned a 51% interest in.
(2)FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders for the twelve months ended September 30, 2021 includes Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs of $35.9 million. FFO Attributable to Common Shareholders for the twelve months ended September 30, 2021 excluding these Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs is $82.0 million.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2020, FASB issued interpretive guidance relating to the accounting for lease concessions provided as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic that allows entities to treat the concession as if it was a part of the existing contract instead of applying lease modification accounting. This guidance is only applicable to the COVID-19 Pandemic related disclosures.lease concessions that do not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or the obligations of the lessee. We have elected this option relating to qualifying rent deferral and rent abatement agreements. For qualifying lease modifications with rent deferrals, this results in no change to our revenue recognition but an increase in the lease receivable balance until the deferred rent has been repaid. For qualifying lease modifications that include rent abatement concessions, this results in a direct reduction of rental income in the current period.

We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

52
Table of Contents

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market-sensitive instruments. The primary market risk to which we believe that we are exposed to is interest rate risk. Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond our control contribute to interest rate risk.

We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our unsecured line of credit facility, margin loans and long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and acquisitions of our real estate investment portfolio. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we match our assets, which are properties secured by long-term leases, with our liabilities, which are long-term fixed rate loans.

Approximately $719,768,000As of September 30, 2021, $839.6 million of our long-term debt as of September 30, 2018 bears a fixed weighted average interest rate of 4.07%3.86%. Therefore, changes in market interest rates affect the fair value of these instruments. As of September 30, 2018,2021, our variable rate debt consists of $160,000,000$75.0 million outstanding on our Term Loan and $175.0 million drawn down under our $225.0 million Revolver. To reduce floating interest rate exposure under our Term Loan, we also entered into an interest rate swap agreement to fix LIBOR on the Facility and $26,608,676 drawn down onentire $75.0 million for the margin linefull duration of credit.the Term Loan resulting in an all-in rate of 2.92%. Currently, our borrowings bear interest under the Revolver at LIBOR plus 145 basis points, which results in an interest rate of 1.53%. If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increased or decreased by 1%, then the annual increase or decrease in interest costs on our variable rate debt would be approximately $1,866,000$2.5 million and the increase or decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt as of September 30, 20182021 would be approximately $29,000,000.$37.7 million.

56
Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information as of September 30, 2018,2021, concerning our long-term debt obligations, including principal payments by scheduled maturity, weighted average interest rates and estimated fair value:value (in thousands):

 Mortgage Notes Payable Loans Payable (1)  Mortgage Notes Payable Loans Payable
   Weighted     Weighted    Weighted Weighted 
Fiscal Year   Average     Average    Average Average 
Ending September 30, Carrying Value Interest
Rate
 Fair Value Carrying Value Interest
Rate
 Fair Value  Carrying Value 

Interest

Rate

 Fair Value Carrying Value 

Interest

Rate

 Fair Value 
                                     
2019 $12,361,789   6.93%     $26,608,676   2.75%    
2020  2,314,257   6.09%      160,000,000   3.90%    
2021  860,364   6.50%      -0-         
2022  29,880,645   5.24%      -0-          $16,170   5.11%     $-0-         
2023  3,719,709   3.95%      -0-           1,104   3.95%      -0-         
2024  24,232   3.92%      175,000   1.53%    
2025  17,264   5.26%      75,000   2.92%    
2026  7,757   3.94%      -0-         
Thereafter  670,631,591   3.96%      -0-           773,095   3.80%      -0-         
Total $719,768,355   4.07% $706,745,000  $186,608,676   3.74% $186,609,000  $839,622   3.86% $885,893  $250,000   1.95% $252,230 

(1)On October 9, 2018, the Loans Payable outstanding balance was reduced to $110,000,000

The $250.0 million Loans Payable in the table above represents our $75.0 million outstanding on our Term Loan and $175.0 drawn down under our Revolver. On August 27, 2015,November 15, 2019, we obtained an unsecured revolving lineentered into a New Facility consisting of credit (the “Facility”). The Facility is syndicated with three banks led by BMO, as sole lead arrangera $225.0 million Revolver and sole book runner, Bank of Montreal as administrative agent, and includes JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (J.P. Morgan) and RBC Capital Markets (RBC) as co-syndication agents. The Facility provided for up to $130,000,000a $75.0 million Term Loan, resulting in available borrowings with a $70,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $200,000,000, subject to certain conditions. The Facility was set to mature in August 2019under both the Revolver and had a one-year extension option, at our option. On September 30, 2016, we entered intothe Term Loan of $300.0 million, which is an amendment toadditional $100.0 million over the Facility (the Amendment), pursuant to which we exercisedformer line of credit facility. In addition, the $70,000,000Revolver includes an accordion feature under the Facility, bringing the maximum availability under the Facility to $200,000,000, and amended the Facility to provide an additional $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringingthat will allow the total potential availability upunder the New Facility to $300,000,000, subjectfurther increase to certain conditions, including, without limitation, obtaining commitments from additional lenders. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity date of the Facility from August 27, 2019 to September 30, 2020, with a one-year extension option, at our option, subject to$400.0 million, under certain conditions. The $225.0 million Revolver matures in January 2024 with two options to extend for additional six-month periods. Availability under the New Facility is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a capitalization rate to the NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Effective, March 22, 2018,Under the New Facility the capitalization rate applied to our NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties was lowered from 7.0%6.5% under the former line of credit facility to 6.5%6.25%, thus increasing the value of the borrowing base properties under the terms of the agreement. BorrowingsNew Facility. In addition, the interest rate for borrowings under the Facility,Revolver was lowered by a range of 5 basis points to 35 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, and will, at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140135 basis points to 220205 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at Bank of Montreal’s (BMO) prime lending rate plus 35 basis points to 105 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Currently, our borrowings bear interest under the Revolver at LIBOR plus 145 basis points, which results in an interest rate of 1.53%. As of the fiscal yearend and currently, we have $175.0 million drawn down under our Revolver, resulting in $50.0 million being currently available. Including the accordion feature, we have up to $150.0 million potentially available under the Revolver. As of September 30, 2021, Loans Payable represented $75.0 million outstanding under our Term Loan which matures January 2025 and $175.0 million outstanding under our Revolver which matures January 2024. The interest rate for borrowings under the Term Loan will at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 130 basis points to 200 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 4030 basis points to 120100 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Our borrowings as of September 30, 2018, based on our leverage ratio as of September 30, 2018, bearTo reduce floating interest at LIBOR plus 170 basis points, which was atrate exposure under the Term Loan, we also entered into an interest rate swap agreement to fix LIBOR on the entire $75.0 million for the full duration of 3.90% asthe Term Loan resulting in an all-in rate of 2.92%. The unrealized loss in fair value of the interest rate swap agreement amounted to $(2.2) million for the year ended September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, $160,000,000 was drawn down under the Facility. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000 on the Facility which reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.2021.

We also invest in marketable securities of other REITs and we are primarily exposed to market price risk from adverse changes in market rates and conditions. We generally limit our marketable securities investmentsthe size of this portfolio to no more than approximately 10%5% of our undepreciated assets, (which is ourwhich we define as total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).depreciation. All securities are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value. We also use margin loans from time to time for purchasing securities, for temporary funding of acquisitions, and for working capital purposes. The margin loans are due on demand and are collateralized by our securities portfolio. In general, we may borrow up to 50% of the value of the marketable securities. At September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, there was $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 outstandingno amount drawn down under the margin loans, respectively.loan. The interest rate on the margin account is the bank’s margin rate and was 2.75% and 2.05% as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.is 0.75%. The value of the marketable securities was $154,920,545$143.5 million as of September 30, 2018,2021, representing 8.0%5.6% of our undepreciated assets (which is our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).

5753
Table of Contents

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements and supplementary data listed in Part IV, Item 15 (a) (1) are incorporated herein by reference and filed as part of this report.

The following is the Unaudited Selected Quarterly Financial Data:

SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

THREE MONTHS ENDED (in thousands)

 

FISCAL 2018 12/31/17  3/31/18  6/30/18  9/30/18 
             
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $32,741,822  $33,621,508  $36,197,825  $36,600,694 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total Expenses  16,267,991   16,920,664   19,073,092   19,471,976 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,441,577)  (5,055,841)  (4,651,340)  (4,969,095)
Income from Continuing Operations  12,242,515   11,645,003   12,473,393   12,159,623 
Income from Continuing Operations per diluted share $0.16  $0.15  $0.16  $0.15 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  5,387,886   -0-   2,097,380   -0- 
Net Income  17,630,401   11,645,003   14,570,773   12,159,623 
Net Income per diluted share $0.23  $0.15  $0.18  $0.15 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  13,313,455   7,396,784   10,322,744   7,782,361 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.17  $0.10  $0.13  $0.10 
                 
FISCAL 2017  12/31/16   3/31/17   6/30/17   9/30/17 
                 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $27,891,442  $28,018,022  $29,318,927  $31,156,914 
Total Expenses  13,972,561   14,495,329   14,840,339   16,294,148 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,064,960)  (5,098,082)  (2,748,225)  (4,600,576)
Income from Continuing Operations  9,853,921   8,424,611   11,730,363   10,262,190 
Income from Continuing Operations per diluted share $0.14  $0.12  $0.16  $0.14 
Net Income  9,853,921   8,424,611   11,730,363   10,262,190 
Net Income per diluted share $0.14  $0.12  $0.16  $0.14 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  6,156,161   4,842,575   5,217,411   6,726,087 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.09  $0.07  $0.07  $0.09 
FISCAL 2021 12/31/20  3/31/21  6/30/21  9/30/21 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $43,583  $46,365  $45,993  $46,815 
Total Expenses  22,159   25,620   32,040   

49,300

 
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Periods  19,721   19,186   16,471   (5,139)
Other Income (Expense)  12,169   13,634   14,648   (13,286)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders  33,916   34,329   25,709   (15,771)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders per diluted share $0.34  $0.35  $0.26  $(0.16)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders  25,746   25,913   17,292   (24,187)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.26  $0.26  $0.17  $(0.25)

FISCAL 2020 12/31/19  3/31/20  6/30/20  9/30/20 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $41,700  $41,707  $41,775  $42,635 
Total Expenses  22,428   21,264   21,459   21,529 
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Periods  (3,635)  (83,075)  19,610   (10,280)
Other Income (Expense)  (9,606)  (88,721)  12,979   (17,963)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders  9,625   (68,314)  33,458   3,088 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders per diluted share $0.10  $(0.70) $0.34  $0.03 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders  3,528   (75,078)  26,850   (3,917)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.04  $(0.77) $0.27  $(0.04)

5854
Table of Contents

ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no changes in, or any disagreements with, our independent registered public accounting firm on accounting principles and practices or financial disclosure during the years ended September 30, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

ITEM 9A- CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2018.2021.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act).

Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018.2021. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2013 framework). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2018.2021.

PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued their report on their audit of our internal control over financial reporting, a copy of which is included herein.

(c) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018,2021, based on criteria established inInternal Control–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018,2021, based on criteria established inInternal Control–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2018,2021, and our report dated November 28, 2018,12, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

5955
Table of Contents

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP

November 28, 201812, 2021

New York, New York

(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during our fourth fiscal quarter ended September 30, 20182021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C – DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

None.

6056
Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following are our Directors and Executive Officers as of September 30, 2018:

Name Age 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 Director
 Since
 

Class

(1)

Kiernan Conway 56 Independent Director. (2)Director of Research and Corporate Engagement of the Alabama Center for Real Estate, and Chief Economist of the CCIM (Certified Commercial Investment Member) Institute (2017-present). Prior Senior Vice-President of Credit Risk Management for Sun Trust in Atlanta, GA (2014-2017). U.S. Chief Economist for Colliers International (2010-2014). Prior affiliations with Federal Reserve in Atlanta, GA, South Trust Bank, Cushman and Wakefield, Equitable Real Estate, Wells Fargo Bank and Deloitte and Touche. Mr. Conway’s extensive experience as an economist with expertise in real estate, real estate finance and logistics are the primary reasons, among others, why Mr. Conway was selected to serve on our Board. 2018 II
         
Daniel D. Cronheim 64 Director. Attorney at Law (1979 to present).Certified Property Manager (2010 to present) from Institute of Real Estate Management (“IREM”). President (2000 to present) of David Cronheim Mortgage Corp., a privately-owned real estate investment bank. Executive Vice President (1997 to present) of Cronheim Management Services, Inc., a real estate management firm. Executive Committee (2012 to present), Secretary-Treasurer (2013-2015), Vice-President 2015-2016), and President (2016 to present) of IREM Chapter One (New Jersey). Member and instructor of the New Jersey State Bar Association Land Use Committee (2014 to present) and Legislative subcommittee chair (2018 to present). Mr. Cronheim’s extensive experience in real estate management and the mortgage industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Cronheim was selected to serve on our Board. 1989 I
         
Catherine B. Elflein 57 Independent Director. (2) Certified Public Accountant. Senior Director – Risk Management (2006 to present) at Celgene Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company; Controller of Captive Insurance Companies (2004 to 2006) and Director – Treasury Operations (1998 to 2004) at Celanese Corporation. Ms. Elflein’s extensive experience in accounting, finance and risk management is the primary reason, among others, why Ms. Elflein was selected to serve on our Board. 2007 III

61
Table of Contents

Name Age 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

Director

Since

 

Class

(1)

Brian H. Haimm 49 Lead Independent Director.(2) Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (2006 to present) of Ascend Capital Group International, LLC, a private equity firm. Mr. Haimm’s extensive experience in accounting, finance and the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Haimm was selected to serve on our Board. 2013 II
         
Neal Herstik 59 Independent Director. (2) Attorney at Law, Gross, Truss & Herstik, PC (1997 to present). Mr. Herstik’s extensive legal experience and experience in the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Herstik was selected to serve on our Board. 2004 II
         
Matthew I. Hirsch 59 

Independent Director. (2)Attorney at Law (1985 to present), Law Office of Matthew I. Hirsch; Adjunct Professor of Law, Delaware Law School of Widener University (1993 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH), a related company, Director (2013 to present).

 

Mr. Hirsch’s experience with real estate transactions, legal issues relating to real estate and the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Hirsch was selected to serve on our Board.

 2000 II
         
Eugene W. Landy 84 

Founder and Chairman of the Board (1968 to present), and Executive Director. President and Chief Executive Officer (1968 to April 2013). Attorney at Law. Chairman of the Board (1995 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Founder and Chairman of the Board (1969 to present), and President (1969 to 1995).

 

As our Founder and Chairman, Mr. Landy’s unparalleled experience in real estate investing is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board.

 

1968

 III

62
Table of Contents

Name Age 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

Director

Since

 

Class

(1)

Michael P. Landy 56 

President and Chief Executive Officer (April 2013 to present) and Executive Director. Chief Operating Officer (2011 to April 2013), Executive Vice President (2009 to 2010), Executive Vice President-Investments (2006 to 2009), and Vice President-Investments (2001 to 2006). Member of New York University’s REIT Center Board of Advisors (2013 to present). Member of Nareit’s Advisory Board of Governors (2018 to present).

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Director (2011 to present).

 

Mr. Landy’s role as our President and Chief Executive Officer and extensive experience in real estate finance, investment, capital markets and operations management are the primary reasons, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board.

 2007 III
         
Samuel A. Landy 58 

Director.Attorney at Law.

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, President and Chief Executive Officer (1995 to present), Vice President (1991 to 1995) and Director (1992 to present).

 

Mr. Landy’s extensive experience in real estate investment and REIT leadership is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Landy was selected to serve on our Board.

 1989 III
         

Kevin S. Miller

 

 49 Chief Financial Officer (July 2012 to present) and Chief Accounting Officer (May 2012 to present) and Executive Director. Certified Public Accountant. Assistant Controller and Assistant Vice-President (2005 to May 2012) of Forest City Ratner, a real estate developer, owner and operator and a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly-held company, Forest City Realty Trust, Inc. Mr. Miller’s extensive experience in accounting, finance and the real estate industry is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Miller was selected to serve on our Board. 2017 I
         
Allison Nagelberg 53 General Counsel (2000 to present).Attorney at Law (1989 to present). Ms. Nagelberg also has a Master of Business Administration in Finance. Ms. Nagelberg is a member of the Rutgers Center for Real Estate Advisory Board (2017 to present). N/A N/A

63
Table of Contents

Name Age 

Present Position with the Company; Business

Experience During Past Five Years; Other

Directorships

 

 Director
Since

 

Class

(1)

Gregory T. Otto 30 Independent Director. (2) Maritime Professional (2011 to present) with experiences in commerce, maritime security, and intermodal logistics. Consultant for Entegra Systems (2018 to present), focused on maritime business and security services. Port Operations Coordinator and Merchant Marine Deck Officer for Maersk Line (2011 to 2014). Lieutenant in the U.S. Naval Reserves (2011 to present), specializing in maritime intelligence. Mr. Otto’s experience in commerce, global markets, and intermodal logistics is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Otto was selected to serve on our Board. 2017 I
         
Scott L. Robinson 48 Independent Director. (2) Managing Director, Oberon Securities (2013 to Present); Clinical Professor of Finance and Director of The REIT Center at New York University (2008 to Present); Managing Partner, Cadence Capital Group (2009 to 2013); Vice President, Citigroup (2006 to 2008); Senior REIT and CMBS analyst (1998 to 2006), Standard & Poor’s. Mr. Robinson’s extensive experience in real estate finance and investment is the primary reason, among others, why Mr. Robinson was selected to serve on our Board. 2005 I
         
Stephen B. Wolgin 64 

Independent Director. (2) Managing Director of U.S. Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (2000 to present), a real estate advisory services group based in New Jersey. Prior Partner with the Logan Asset Backed Fund, LP (2007 to 2017). Prior affiliations with J.P. Morgan, Odyssey Associates, The Prudential Realty Group, Standard & Poor’s Corporation, and Grubb and Ellis.

 

For UMH Properties, Inc., a related company, Director (2007 to present).

 

Mr. Wolgin’s extensive experience in real estate finance and investment are the primary reasons, among others, why Mr. Wolgin was selected to serve on our Board.

 2003 II

(1)Class I, II, and III Directors have terms expiring at the annual meetings of our shareholders to be held in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively, and when their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.
(2)Independent within the meaning of applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards and SEC rules.

All officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors, subjectinformation required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the rights, if any,definitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of any officer under any employment contract. Officers are elected by the Board of Directors annually and as maystockholders to be appropriate to fill a vacancy in an office.

With the addition of Mr. Conway to our Board of Directors on September 13, 2018, we have increased our percentage of independent directors from approximately 58% to 62%.

64
Table of Contents

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of the directors or executive officers,filed with the exception of Samuel A. LandySEC pursuant to Regulation 14A and Michael P. Landy who are the sons of our Founder, Eugene W. Landy, who is the Chairman of the Board and an Executive Director.

Audit Committee

We have a separately-designated standing audit committee whose members are Brian H. Haimm (Chairman), Catherine B. Elflein, Stephen B. Wolgin, Matthew I. Hirsch and Scott L. Robinson. Our Board has determined that Brian H. Haimm, Catherine B. Elflein, Scott L. Robinson and Stephen B. Wolgin are audit committee financial experts and that all members of the audit committee are independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE. The audit committee operatesinformation included under the Audit Committee Charter, which can be found atcaption “Information about our website atwww.mreic.reit. The charter is reviewed annually for adequacy.Executive Officers” in Part I hereof, in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

Compensation Committee

We have a separately-designated standing compensation committee, consisting of three of our independent directors: Brian H. Haimm (Chairman), Matthew I. Hirsch and Gregory T. Otto. Our Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee operates under the Compensation Committee Charter, which can be found at our website atwww.mreic.reit. The Compensation Committee charter is reviewed annually for adequacy. The role of the Compensation Committee is discussed in greater detail below in the section on Executive Compensation.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

We have a separately-designated standing nominating and corporate governance committee, consisting of three of our independent directors: Matthew I. Hirsch (Chairman), Gregory T. Otto and Stephen B. Wolgin. Our Board has determined that all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, which can be found at our website atwww.mreic.reit. The charter is reviewed annually for adequacy. Among its other responsibilities, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and evaluates candidates to be nominated as directors, which may include candidates put forward by shareholders. Qualifications considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in evaluating nominees include, but are not limited to, a candidate’s judgment, skill, experience with businesses and organizations comparable to the Company, the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members, the candidate’s independence according to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, diversity, and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board and any of its committees.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

There have been no delinquent filings pursuant to Item 405 of regulation S-K, to the best of management’s knowledge.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as our other officers, directors and employees (Code of Ethics). The Code of Ethics can be found at our website atwww.mreic.reit. The Code of Ethics is also available in print to any person without charge who requests a copy by writing or telephoning us at the following address and telephone number: Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, Attention: Stockholder Relations, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-D, Juniper Business Plaza, Freehold, New Jersey 07728, (732) 577-9996. We will satisfy any disclosure requirements under Item 5.05(c) of Form 8-K regarding a waiver from any provision of the Code of Ethics for principal officers or directors by disclosing the nature of such amendment of waiver on our website atwww.mreic.reit.

65
Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Materials

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are published on the Corporate Governance page of the Investor Relations section on our website atwww.mreic.reit. (We are not including the other information contained on, or available through, our website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this 10-K. Such information includes, but is not limited to, our Commitment to Environment and Society and our Vendor Code of Conduct.)

ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table highlights important aspects of our executive compensation program, which promote good governance and serve the interests of our shareholders.

Highlights
Cash bonus program for Chairman and CEO tied to objective financial performance goals
Total executive compensation for our Named Executive Officers is within the lowest 25th percentile in the REIT industry for REITS with comparable data based upon the 2018 NAREIT Compensation Survey
Clawback policy

Robust stock ownership guidelines:

● CEO: 6x base salary

● Other Named Executive Officers: 2x base salary

● Directors: 3x annual cash fee

● Named Executive Officers retain (for a minimum of 24 months) at least 50% of the shares received upon vesting of restricted stock or the exercise of stock options (net of any shares sold or forfeited for payment of exercise price, tax or withholding)

Annual say-on-pay vote
Compensation Committee has considered the report of an independent compensation consultant
No excessive perquisites or other benefits
No repricing or buyout of stock options
No excise tax gross-ups
Average total Director compensation is approximately half of the average total director compensation of Comparable REITs (as defined below)

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview of Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee (for purposes ofinformation required by this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the “Committee”) of the Board has been appointed to implement and exercise the Board’s responsibilities relatingitem is incorporated herein by reference to the compensation of our executive officers and directors. The Committee has the overall responsibility for evaluating and approving our executive compensation plan, policies and programs, and does not delegate this responsibility to any other person(s). The Committee’s primary objectives include serving as an independent and objective party to review such compensation plan, policies and programs. To assist in the process, the Committee has, from time to time, retained the advice of a compensation consultant as outlined below in the section entitled Engagement of Compensation Consultant.

66
Table of Contents

Throughout this report, the individuals who served as our Chairman of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer and other officers included in the Summary Compensation Table presented below of this report, are sometimes referred to in this report as the Named Executive Officers.

Since 1968, we have delivered consistent and reliable returns for our shareholders. Over the last 10 years, we have outperformed the MSCI US REIT Index by a wide margin of approximately three times. Our total shareholder return (TSR) over the last 10 fiscal years through September 30, 2018 was 303% as compared to 106%definitive proxy statement for the MSCI US REIT Index during the same period. TSR includes both dividends reinvested and stock price appreciation. Historically, REIT dividends have accounted for approximately 65%Company’s 2021 annual meeting of total shareholder return. We believe that it is essential that dividends be factored into evaluating a REIT’s economic performance. Our dividend has provenstockholders to be very reliable because our industrial properties are predominantly subject to long-term net leases to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries. In view of the substantial progress made by us during fiscal year 2017, on October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved a 6.3% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.17 per share from $0.16 per share. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.68 per share. This increase was the second dividend increase within two years. The prior dividend increase was on October 1, 2015, at which time our Board of Directors approved a 6.7% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.16 per share from $0.15 per share. These two dividend raises represent a total increase of 13%. We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 27 consecutive years. We are one of the few REITs that maintained our dividend throughout the Global Financial Crisis. We are also one of the few REITs that is paying out a higher per share dividend today than prior to the Global Financial Crisis.

The following charts illustrate our outperformance over a 10-year period as compared to the S&P 500 Index and the MSCI US REIT Index for the same period and our outperformance over a 1-year period as compared to the MSCI US REIT Index for the same period:

 

67
Table of Contents

The following chart illustrates our growth in Capital Structure over the last five years:

 

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Committee believes that a well-designed compensation program should align the interests of the Named Executive Officersfiled with the interests of the shareholders, and that a significant part of the executives’ compensation, over the long term, should be dependent upon the value created for shareholders. In addition, all executives should be held accountable through their compensation for our performance and compensation levels should reflect the executives’ individual performance in an effort to encourage increased individual contributions to our performance. This compensation philosophy, as reflected in our employment agreements with our executives and the overall compensation program, is designed to motivate our executives to focus on operating results and create long-term shareholder value by:

establishing a compensation program that attracts, retains and motivates executives through compensation that is competitive with comparable publicly-traded REITs;
rewarding executives for individual accomplishments and achievements;
linking a portion of each executive’s compensation to the achievement of our business plan by using measurements of our operating results and shareholder return; and
building a pay-for-performance program that encourages and rewards successful initiatives within a team environment.

The salaries and bonuses in our executive employment agreements are consistent with the Committee’s philosophy and objectives.

The Committee believes that each of the above factors is important when determining compensation levels for Named Executive Officers. The Committee reviews and approves the employment contracts for the Chairman of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers, and reviews and approves the performance goals and objectives applicable to their performance-based compensation. The Committee annually evaluates the performance of the Named Executive Officers in light of those goals and objectives. The Committee considers our performance, relative shareholder return, the total compensation provided to comparable officers at similarly-situated companies, and compensation earned by the Named Executive Officers in prior years.

68
Table of Contents

The Committee believes that the executive compensation packages that we provide to our Named Executive Officers should include both base salaries and annual bonus awards that reward corporate and individual performance, as well as give incentives to executives to meet or exceed established goals. As a result, an important portion of our compensation program is comprised of discretionary bonuses and equity awards as determined by the Committee in recognition of individual accomplishments and achievements, as well as overall company performance.

Historically, the Committee has used the annual Compensation Survey published by NAREIT (Survey) as a guide to setting compensation levels. Total executive compensation paid by us fell within the lowest range (25th percentile) within the REIT industry for REITs with comparable data based upon the 2018 Compensation Survey published by NAREIT. Participant company data is not presented within the Survey in a manner that specifically identifies any named individual or company. This Survey details compensation by position type and company size with statistical salary and bonus information for each position. The subsets presented in the Survey which the Committee also uses for comparison purposes are the industrial property sector, entities with a total market capitalization between $1.5 billion and $3.0 billion and entities with less than 75 full-time employees. The Committee compares our salary and bonus amounts to the ranges presented in this Survey for reasonableness.

During the last quarter of fiscal 2017, the Committee engaged FPL Associates (FPL), a nationally recognized compensation consulting firm specializing in the REIT industry, to provide market-based compensation data and to advise the Committee on industry trends and best practices. As a result of the compensation analysis, the Committee is exploring the possibility of providing for a greater percentage of total compensation for our Named Executive Officers to be paid in the form of performance-based equity.

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

The Committee recommends to the Board all compensation decisions with respect to our Named Executive Officers. The Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer review the performance of the other Named Executive Officers and then present their conclusions and recommendations to the Committee with respect to base salary adjustments, annual cash bonuses and stock options or restricted stock awards. The Committee exercises its own discretion in modifying and implementing any recommended adjustments or awards but does consider the recommendations from management who work closely with the other Named Executive Officers.

Role of Grants of Stock Options and Restricted Stock in Compensation Analysis

The Committee views the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards as a form of long-term compensation. The Committee believes that such grants promote our goal of retaining key employees and align the key employees’ interests with those of our shareholders from a long-term perspective. The number of options or shares of restricted stock granted to each employee, and the performance or time-based vesting criteria associated with each grant, is determined by consideration of various factors including but not limited to the employee’s contribution, title, responsibilities, and years of service. The Committee takes outstanding awards of stock options and restricted stock into account in making its compensation determinations.

Role of Employment Agreements in Determining Executive Compensation

Each of our currently employed Named Executive Officers is a party to an employment agreement. These agreements establish the base salaries, bonuses and customary fringe benefits for each Named Executive Officer. The employment agreements also provide for certain severance benefits in the event the Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated. The employment agreements also provide for certain severance benefits in the event of a change in control and to alleviate the financial impact of termination of employment, through base salary and health benefit continuation with the intention of providing for a stable work environment. In determining initial compensation, as incorporated into the employment agreements, the Committee considers all elements of a Named Executive Officer’s total compensation package in comparison to current market practices and other benefits. In reviewing and setting compensation for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee takes the terms of the employment agreements into consideration.

69
Table of Contents

Shareholder Advisory Vote

One way to determine if our compensation program reflects the interests of shareholders is through their non-binding advisory vote on our executive compensation practices. At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 17, 2018, approximately 92% of votes cast (excluding broker non-votes) were voted in favor of our Say-On-Pay proposal, which we believe affirms our shareholders’ support of our approach to our executive compensation program.

We provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote annually on the advisory approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (Say-on-Pay proposal). The Committee will continue to consider the outcome of our Say-on-Pay proposals when making future compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.

Engagement of Compensation Consultant

Pursuant to its charter, the Committee is authorized to retain the services of an executive compensation advisor, in its discretion, to assist with the establishment and review of our compensation programs and related policies. The Committee did not retain a compensation consultant for prior years because the Committee determined that the Survey and other information available to it provided comprehensive information regarding executive compensation levels and structure. In August 2017, the Committee engaged FPL to provide additional market-based compensation data and to advise on industry trends and best practices. In order to help the Committee fairly evaluate our executive compensation in light of our relative economic performance, FPL prepared for the Committee a peer group of REITs with similar total capitalization, ranging between $1.4 billion and $4.0 billion (approximately 0.7x-2.0x Monmouth’s total capitalization at that time), and/or REITs that operate within the industrial REIT sector and with whom we compete for executive employees.

The peer group of comparable REITs (Comparable REITS) identified by FPL are as follows:

Agree Realty Corporation

EastGroup Properties*

Getty Realty Corporation

Hersha Hospitality Trust

LTC Properties, Inc.

Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.*

STAG Industrial, Inc.*

Terreno Realty Corporation*

TIER REIT, Inc.

Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc.

*Denotes a peer that is in the Industrial sector

FPL compared our aggregate pay and performance to those of our peers over the prior three-year period. Based upon this analysis, FPL concluded that our aggregate pay at that time ranked at the lowest end of the aggregate pay provided by our peers, and that our performance by Total Shareholder Return was at the highest end of performance of our peers.

The Committee used this data as one tool in considering compensation for our Named Executive Officers for compensation decisions beginning in fiscal 2018. Information about peers includes but is not limited to: base salaries, annual bonuses, long-term equity incentives, composition ranges by position, governance practices, market trends and industry performance. The peer group compensation analyses prepared by FPL have been utilized by the Compensation Committee for informational purposes only and have not been, and will not be utilized for benchmarking purposes as we do not have formal benchmarking policies for comparing to our peers or the market. The Compensation Committee’s executive compensation determinations are subjective and the result of the Compensation Committee’s business judgment, which is informed by peer group data provided by FPL and will continue to be informed by the experiences of the members of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee ultimately uses its own judgment in making final decisions regarding the compensation paid to our executive officers.

70
Table of Contents

Other than advising the Committee as described above, FPL did not provide any other services to us. The Committee has sole authority to hire, terminate and set the terms of engagement with FPL. The Committee has considered the independence of FPL, consistent with the requirements of NYSE, and has determined that FPL is independent. Further,SEC pursuant to SEC rules, the Committee conducted a conflicts of interest assessment and determined that there are no conflicts of interest resulting from retaining FPL. FPL does not provide any services to our management and has no prior relationship with us prior to its engagement by the Committee. The Committee intends to reassess the independence of FPL or any other compensation consultant retained by the Committee at least annually.

Elements of Executive Officer Compensation

In addition to its determination of the Named Executives’ individual performance levels for fiscal 2018, the Committee compared the Named Executives’ total compensation for fiscal 2018 to that of similarly-situated personnel of other comparably sized REITs as noted in the report provided by FPL. Furthermore, the Committee compared the Named Executives’ total compensation for 2018 to that within the REIT industry in the Survey described above. For fiscal 2018, our total compensation fell within the lowest range (25th percentile) within the REIT industry for REITS with comparable data in the Survey described above.

Our executive compensation structure includes the following objectives and core features:

Base Salaries

Base salaries are the principal fixed component of a Named Executive Officer’s compensation and are paid for performance of ongoing day-to-day job responsibilities throughout the year. In order to compete for and retain talented executives who are critical to our long-term success, the Committee has determined that the base salaries of Named Executive Officers should approximate those of executives of other equity REITs that compete with us for employees, investors and business, while also taking into account the Named Executive Officers’ performance and tenure, and our performance relative to the performance reported for companies in the industrial property sector, entities with total market capitalization between $1.5 billion and $3.0 billion and entities with less than 75 full-time employees within the REIT industry in the Survey described above.

Bonuses

Performance-based Cash Bonus Awards

In addition to the provisions for base salaries under the terms of their employment agreements and discretionary cash bonuses awarded by the Committee in recognition of individual accomplishments and achievements, the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer are entitled to receive annual cash bonuses for each year during the terms of each respective employment agreement provided certain performance goals set by the Committee as described below are achieved.

For the Chairman of the Board:

Growth in market cap  7.5%  12.5%  20%
Bonus $20,000  $45,000  $90,000 
             
Growth in FFO/share  7.5%  12.5%  20%
Bonus $20,000  $45,000  $90,000 
             
Growth in dividend/share  5%  10%  15%
Bonus $30,000  $60,000  $120,000 
             
Maximum Bonus Potential $300,000         

71
Table of Contents

For the President and Chief Executive Officer:

Growth in market cap      10%  15%  20%
Bonus     $40,000  $60,000  $80,000 
                 
Growth in AFFO/share  5%  10%  15%  20%
Bonus (1) $50,000  $75,000  $100,000  $150,000 
                 
Growth in dividend/share  5%  10%  15%    
Bonus $150,000  $200,000  $250,000     
                 
Maximum Bonus Potential $480,000             
                 

(1)Provided that FFO is equal to or in excess of the dividend

Our Chairman of the Board earned a $95,000 cash bonus for fiscal 2018 based on our growth in market cap, growth in FFO/share and growth in dividend/share, and our President and Chief Executive Officer earned a $290,000 cash bonus for fiscal 2018 based on our growth in market cap, growth in AFFO/share and growth in dividend/share.

Discretionary Cash Bonus Awards

The Committee considers discretionary cash bonuses for the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer annually. Discretionary cash bonuses awarded to the other Named Executive Officers are based on recommendations made annually by the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer, which are then considered and approved by the Committee in its discretion. The Committee believes that short-term rewards in the form of discretionary cash bonuses to senior executives generally should reflect short-term results and should take into consideration both the profitability and our performance and the performance of the individual, which may include comparing such individual’s performance to that in the preceding year, reviewing the breadth and nature of the senior executive’s responsibilities and valuing special contributions by each such individual. In evaluating our performance annually, for purposes of discretionary cash bonuses, the Committee considers a variety of factors, including, among others, Funds From Operations (FFO), Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO), net income, growth in asset size, amount of space under lease and total return to shareholders. We consider FFO to be an important measure of an equity REIT’s operating performance and have adopted the definition suggested by NAREIT, which defines FFO to mean net income computedRegulation 14A, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization. We define AFFO as FFO plus acquisition costs and costs associated with the Redemption of Preferred Stock less recurring capital expenditures and excluding the following: lease termination income, gains or losses on securities transactions, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of financing and leasing commission costs, depreciation of corporate office tenant improvements, straight-line rent adjustments and non-recurring other expense. We consider FFO and AFFOGeneral Instruction G(3) to be meaningful additional measures of operating performance, primarily because they exclude the assumption that the value of our real estate assets diminishes predictably over time and because industry analysts have accepted these as performance measures.Form 10-K.

Other factors considered include the employee’s title and years of service. The employee’s title generally reflects the employee’s responsibilities and the employee’s years of service may be considered in determining the level of discretionary cash bonus in comparison to base salary. The Committee has declined in the past to use specific performance formulas with respect to the cash bonuses awarded to the other Named Executive Officers, believing that with respect to our performance, such formulas do not adequately account for many factors, including, among others, our relative performance compared to our competitors during variations in the economic cycle, and that with respect to individual performance, such formulas are not a substitute for the subjective evaluation by the Committee of a wide range of management and leadership skills of each of the senior executives.

In setting discretionary bonuses for fiscal 2018, the Committee considered the performance of the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer and received the recommendations from the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer for the discretionary cash bonuses to be awarded to the other Named Executive Officers. The Committee also considered management’s report on our progress toward our fiscal 2018 achievements in financial performance and strategic growth, and the role of each Named Executive Officer in delivering these achievements:

72
Table of Contents

Financial Performance

Growth in Market Capitalization: Achieved $2.5 billion in total market capitalization as of September 30, 2018, resulting in year over year growth of 17% for fiscal 2018.
Growth in Total Shareholder Return: Achieved an 8% total shareholder return for fiscal 2018, versus 4% return from the MSCI US REIT Index during the same period.
Growth in Gross Leasable Area: Achieved 13% year over year growth in gross leasable area for fiscal 2018, with 21.2 million total rentable square feet as of September 30, 2018.
Growth in Net Income per Diluted Share: Generated 53% year over year per diluted share growth in Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders for fiscal 2018.
Growth in AFFO per Diluted Share*: Generated 14% year over year growth in adjusted funds from operation (AFFO) per diluted share for fiscal 2018.
Dividend Increase: On October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved a 6.25% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.17 per share from $0.16 per share. This represents an annualized dividend rate of $0.68 per share. We have maintained or increased our dividend for 27 consecutive years.

Strategic Growth

Property Acquisitions: Located and acquired seven, brand new, Class A industrial properties in fiscal 2018, totaling approximately 2.7 million square feet, without placing undue burden on liquidity.
Property Expansions: Completed two property expansions during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, totaling $3.5 million, generating over $367,000 in additional rental revenue and extending the lease maturity 10 years from the date of each completed expansion.
Commitments to Acquire Property: Entered into agreements to acquire three, brand new, Class A industrial properties in fiscal 2018, totaling approximately 745,000 square feet, of which one property was acquired subsequent to fiscal yearend.
At-The-Market Transaction: On June 29, 2017, we entered into the Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program under which we were able to offer and sell shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000 of our 6.125% Series C preferred stock. Since inception through September 30, 2018, we sold 3,088,001 shares under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000, of which 1,648,556 shares were sold during the fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $40,094,000.
Capital Raising through DRIP: Raised approximately $90.0 million through our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP) during fiscal 2018.
Tenant Occupancy: Achieved 99.6% occupancy as of September 30, 2018.
Controlled General and Administrative Expense: Managed G&A costs to an appropriate level. G&A expenses, as a percentage of gross revenue decreased by 8% to 5.8% and G&A as a percentage of undepreciated assets decreased by 4% to 46 basis points for fiscal 2018.

*AFFO is a non-GAAP performance measure. See Financial Information on page 31 for a discussion of our non-GAAP performance measures.

73
Table of Contents

After considering our progress towards our fiscal 2018 financial performance and strategic growth achievements, as outlined above, as well as the individual performance of the Chairman of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers, and the recommendations of the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer as to the other Named Executive Officers, the Committee established the individual discretionary cash bonuses for the Named Executive Officers based on our overall performance and the Named Executive Officers’ individual contributions to these accomplishments. Other factors considered in determining individual bonus amounts included the Named Executive Officers’ responsibilities and years of service. During fiscal 2018, the Chairman of the Board received a discretionary cash bonus of $95,615, the President and Chief Executive Officer received a discretionary cash bonus of $160,577, the Chief Financial and Accounting Officer received a discretionary cash bonus of $141,250 and the General Counsel received a discretionary cash bonus of $92,500.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

In part based on market-based compensation data and information on industry trends and best practices received from FPL, the Committee is considering providing for a greater percentage of total compensation for our Named Executive Officers to be paid in the form of performance-based equity and is exploring the possibility of developing a long-term performance-based equity compensation plan. All grants of equity will be made pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2007 Incentive Award Plan, which was approved by our shareholders on May 18, 2017.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock

The employment agreement for the Chairman of the Board states that he will receive options to purchase 65,000 shares of stock annually. The employment agreement for the President and Chief Executive Officer states that he will be entitled to equity awards of up to 25,000 shares of restricted stock each year based on achievement of performance objectives as determined by the Committee including, but not limited to, AFFO per share growth, acquisitions and total return performance. In addition, the Committee has the discretion to make additional awards of stock options and restricted stock for outstanding performance.

For the other Named Executive Officers, the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer make a recommendation to the Committee for specific stock options or restricted stock grants. In making its decisions, the Committee does not use an established formula or focus on a specific performance target. The Committee recognizes that often outside forces beyond the control of management, such as economic conditions, changing leasing and real estate markets and other factors, may contribute to less favorable near-term results even when sound strategic decisions have been made by the senior executives to position Monmouth for longer term profitability. Thus, the Committee also attempts to identify whether the senior executives are exercising the kind of judgment and making the types of decisions that will lead to future growth and enhanced asset value, even if the same are difficult to measure on a current basis. For example, in determining appropriate stock option and restricted stock awards, the Committee considers, among other matters, whether the senior executives have executed strategies that will provide adequate funding or appropriate borrowing capacity for future growth, whether acquisition and leasing strategies have been developed to ensure a future stream of reliable and increasing revenues for Monmouth, whether the selection of properties, tenants and tenant mix evidence appropriate risk management, including risks associated with real estate markets and tenant credit, and whether the administration of staff size and compensation appropriately balances our current and projected operating requirements with the need to effectively control overhead costs, while continuing to grow the enterprise. Other than the equity awards required to be paid to our Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to their employment agreement and amounts awarded to Named Executive Officers who are also directors as part of our Director Compensation Plan, no equity awards were made to Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2018.

74
Table of Contents

Other Personal Benefits

Our employment agreements provide the Named Executive Officers with other personal benefits that we and the Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The Committee periodically reviews the levels of other personal benefits provided to the Named Executive Officers.

The Named Executive Officers are provided the following benefits under the terms of their employment agreements: an allotted number of paid vacation weeks; eligibility for the executive, as well as spouse and dependents where applicable, in all our sponsored employee benefits plans, including 401(k) plan, group health, accident, and life insurance, on terms no less favorable than applicable to any other executive; and supplemental disability insurance, at our cost. Attributed costs of the personal benefits described above for the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, are included in “All Other Compensation” of the Summary Compensation Table provided below under Item 11 of this report.

Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

In addition, the Named Executive Officers’ employment agreements each contain provisions relating to change in control events. The employment agreements also contain severance or continuation of salary payments upon any termination of the Named Executive Officers’ employment, except in the case of Mr. Miller or Ms. Nagelberg, whose severance payments are only upon a termination other than for cause (as defined under the terms of the employment agreements). These change in control and severance terms have been deemed reasonable by the Compensation Committee based on the tenure and performance of each Named Executive Officer. Information regarding these provisions is included in “Employment Agreements” provided below in this Annual Report. There are no other agreements or arrangements governing change in control payments.

Evaluation

In evaluating Mr. Eugene W. Landy’s and Mr. Michael P. Landy’s eligibility for annual cash bonuses, the Committee used the bonus schedule included in their respective Amended Employment Agreements as a guide and, in considering discretionary cash bonuses for all Named Executive Officers, considered the factors detailed above under the heading “Bonuses.”

The Committee also reviewed the progress made by Mr. Michael P. Landy, President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as his contributions toward the progress that we had made that enabled us to reach the milestones discussed under “Bonuses” above. Mr. Landy is employed under an employment agreement with us. His base compensation under this contract was increased effective October 1, 2016 to $750,000 and will increase by 5% each year through fiscal 2021. The amended employment agreement has an initial term of five years and is renewed automatically for a new five-year term on the first day of each calendar quarter after the effective date unless otherwise terminated, and contains provisions for continuation of salary payments through the expiration of the term of the agreement upon any termination of Mr. Landy’s employment. Upon execution of the amended employment agreement in January 2016, Mr. Landy received a cash signing bonus of $400,000 in recognition of the substantial progress that we have made under his leadership. During 2016, when considering the new employment agreement and signing bonus, the Compensation Committee took into account the transformative changes that Company has enjoyed over the past several years, which include the Company’s total market capitalization growing more than three-fold since fiscal 2010, and the company’s total assets nearly tripling as well since that time, while the Company’s general and administrative expenses only doubled over this period. Since fiscal 2010 through fiscal 2018, our total market capitalization has grown by approximately 5.0x and our total assets have grown by approximately 4.0x, while our G&A expenses increased by only 2.3x over this period.

All Named Executive Officers were awarded their respective compensation based on their respective Employment Agreements and the many contributions that they have made towards our progress, as further detailed above, under the heading “Bonuses”. The Committee also considered the recommendations of the Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer concerning the other Named Executive Officers’ annual salaries, bonuses, and fringe benefits.

75
Table of Contents

Clawback Policy

In October 2017, the Committee adopted a clawback policy that provides that in the event of a material restatement of our financial results, other than a restatement caused by a change in applicable accounting rules or interpretations, the Committee will review the performance-based compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as defined in our Proxy Statement from year to year, for the three years prior to such material restatement. If the Committee determines that the amount of any performance-based compensation actually paid or awarded to a Named Executive Officer (Awarded Compensation) would have been lower if it had been calculated based on such restated financial statements (Actual Compensation) and that such executive officer engaged in actual fraud or willful unlawful misconduct that materially contributed to the need for the restatement, then the Committee may direct us to recoup the after-tax portion of the difference between the Awarded Compensation and the Actual Compensation for the Named Executive Officers. The Committee has absolute discretion to administer and interpret this policy in our best interests.

Ownership Guidelines

In order to encourage our directors and Named Executive Officers to retain investments in us and help further align their interests with the interests of our stockholders, the Committee has adopted stock ownership guidelines applicable to our directors, our Chief Executive Officer and our other Named Executive Officers, recommending that they hold the following amounts of our stock:

PositionStock Ownership Guideline
Chief Executive Officer6x base salary
Other NEOs2x base salary
Director3x annual cash fee
All NEOs50% of net shares received upon exercise/vesting of equity awards (24 month holding period)

For purposes of determining compliance with these ownership guidelines (other than the holding period for vested equity compensation), the value of each director’s or officer’s stock holdings will be calculated based on the closing price of a share of our common stock on the last trading day of our fiscal year, which was $16.72 on September 28, 2018. Shares owned by a director or officer include: shares owned outright by the director or officer or by his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; shares held in trust or under a similar arrangement for the economic benefit of the director or officer; restricted or unrestricted stock issued as part of the director or officer’s compensation, whether or not vested; shares acquired upon option exercise that the director or executive officer continues to own; and shares held for the director or executive officer’s account in a 401(k) or other retirement plan.

Our Chief Executive Officer Stock Ownership Policy was adopted in September 2015. As of September 30, 2018, Mr. Michael P. Landy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, owned stock valued at more than 13x his base salary and which is also approximately 2.0x our CEO stock ownership requirement. Our Director Stock Ownership policy was adopted effective September 12, 2017, and our other stock ownership policies were adopted effective October 1, 2017.

The aggregate stock ownership of our directors and officers represent approximately 4.5% of our outstanding common stock, which currently represents the third largest block of shareholders behind two institutional investors and helps align our management’s interests with our shareholders’ interests.

76
Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this report.

Compensation Committee:
Brian H. Haimm (Chairman)

Matthew I. Hirsch

Gregory T. Otto

77
Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table

The following Summary Compensation Table shows compensation paid or accrued by us for services rendered during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016 to the Named Executive Officers. There were no other executive officers whose aggregate compensation exceeded $100,000 during fiscal 2018.

Name and

Principal Position

 

Fiscal

Year

  

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock

Awards ($) (4)

  

Option

Awards

($) (5)

  

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

($)

  

Change in

Pension Value

And Nonqualified

Deferred Compensation

Earnings

($)

  

All Other

Compensation ($)

  Total ($) 
Eugene W. Landy  2018  $430,500  $95,615  $4,823  $119,600  $95,000  $11,043(1) $68,500(2) $825,081 
Chairman of the Board  2017   430,500   66,558   17,130   104,650   90,000   13,929(1)  58,750   781,517 
   2016   425,375   65,769   545,600   48,100   210,000   16,601(1)  49,500   1,360,945 
                                     
Michael P. Landy  2018  $787,500  $160,577  $210,698  $-0-  $290,000  $-0-  $83,080(3) $1,531,855 
President and Chief  2017   750,000   105,000   17,130   -0-   130,000   -0-   73,130   1,075,260 
Executive Officer  2016   551,250   501,202   -0-   -0-   135,000   -0-   63,100   1,250,552 
                                     
Kevin S. Miller  2018  $392,538  $141,250  $4,823  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $81,316(6) $619,927 
Chief Financial and  2017   373,846   81,000   17,130   58,000   -0-   -0-   28,616   558,592 
Accounting Officer  2016   330,637   74,329   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   10,600   415,566 
                                     
Allison Nagelberg  2018  $372,094  $92,500  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $-0-  $10,800(7) $475,394 
General Counsel  2017   354,375   63,125   -0-   43,500   -0-   -0-   10,600   471,600 
   2016   337,188   62,500   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   10,600   410,288 

Notes:

(1)Accrual for pension and other benefits of $11,043, $13,929 and $16,601 for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, in accordance with Mr. Landy’s employment agreement.
(2)Represents annual cash directors’ fee of $48,000 for fiscal 2018 and directors’ meeting fees of $20,500 for fiscal 2018.
(3)Represents annual cash directors’ fee of $48,000 for fiscal 2018 and directors’ meeting fees of $20,500 for fiscal 2018 and fringe benefits and discretionary contributions to our 401(k) Plan allocated to an account of the Named Executive Officer and reimbursement of a disability policy.
(4)The restricted stock values were established based on the number of shares granted as follows, for fiscal 2018: 10/3/17-$16.47, for fiscal 2017: 9/12/17-$15.92, and for fiscal 2016: 9/14/16-$13.64. Unrestricted stock awards in fiscal 2018 comprises an annual directors’ fee paid to Mr. Eugene W. Landy, Mr. Michael P. Landy and Mr. Kevin S. Miller in the form of 300 shares of unrestricted common stock each (900 shares total) valued at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share. Unrestricted stock awarded in fiscal 2017 comprises one quarter of an annual cash directors’ fee paid to Mr. Eugene W. Landy, Mr. Michael P. Landy and Mr. Kevin S. Miller in the form of 76 shares of unrestricted common stock each (228 total) valued at $15.92 per share.
(5)The fair value of the stock option grant was based on the Black-Scholes valuation model. See table below for detail. The actual value of the options will depend upon our performance during the period of time the options are outstanding and the price of our common stock on the date of exercise.
(6)Represents annual cash directors’ fee of $48,000, directors’ meeting fees of $20,500 and discretionary contributions to our 401(k) Plan allocated to an account of the Named Executive Officer and reimbursement of a disability policy.
(7)Consists of fringe benefits and discretionary contributions to our 401(k) Plan allocated to an account of the Named Executive Officer and reimbursement of a disability policy.

78
Table of Contents

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Michael P. Landy:

For Fiscal 2018:

-The annual total compensation of the employee identified at the median of our company as of September 30, 2018 (other than the CEO) was $200,874; and
-The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Form 10-K, was $1,531,855.

Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was 7.6 to 1.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

Pay ratios within our industry will also differ and may not be comparable depending on the size, scope, global breadth and structure of the company.

To identify the median employee of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments and estimates that we used were as follows:

-To identify our median employee, we calculated fiscal 2018 compensation using each employee’s annual base salary, bonuses, value of equity awards and our contributions to applicable retirement plans;
-We determined that, as of September 30, 2018, our employee population, excluding our CEO (“Employee Population”), consisted of 14 individuals;
-With the exception of our CEO, we did not exclude any employees from our Employee Population;
-All employees are located in the United States, and therefore we did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the median employee; and
-Once the median employee was identified, we calculated the total compensation for our median employee using the same methodology we used to calculate Mr. Michael P. Landy’s total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for the fiscal year 2018.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

At our Annual Meeting held on May 18, 2017, our common shareholders approved our Amended and Restated 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the Plan) which extended the term of our 2007 Incentive Award Plan for an additional 10 years, until March 13, 2027, added 1,600,000 shares of common stock to the share reserve, expanded the types of awards available for grant under the Plan and made other improvements to the 2007 Plan.

Options to purchase 65,000 shares were granted in fiscal 2018 and options to purchase 40,000 shares were exercised during fiscal 2018. In addition, during fiscal 2018, 12,500 shares of restricted common stock and 3,670 shares of unrestricted common stock were granted. As of September 30, 2018, the number of shares remaining for future grant under the Plan is 1,671,872.

79
Table of Contents

The Committee, in its capacity as Plan Administrator shall determine, among other things: the recipients of awards; the type and number of awards participants will receive; the terms, conditions and forms of the awards; the times and conditions subject to which awards may be exercised or become vested, deliverable or exercisable, or as to which any restrictions may apply or lapse; and may amend or modify the terms and conditions of an award, except that repricing of options or Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) is not permitted without shareholder approval.

No participant may receive awards during any calendar year covering more than 200,000 shares of common stock or more than $1,500,000 in cash. Regular annual awards granted to non-employee directors as compensation for services as non-employee directors, during any of our fiscal years, may not exceed $100,000 in value of the date of grant, and the grant date value of any special or one-time award upon election or appointment to the Board of Directors may not exceed $200,000.

Awards granted pursuant to the Plan generally may not vest until the first anniversary of the date the award was granted, provided, however, that up to 5% of the Common Shares available under the Plan may be awarded to any one or more Eligible Individuals without the minimum vesting period.

If an award made under the Plan is forfeited, expires or is converted into shares of another entity in connection with a recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, exchange of shares or other similar event, or the award is settled in cash, the shares associated with the forfeited, expired, converted or settled award will become available for additional awards under the Plan.

The term of any stock option or SAR generally may not be more than 10 years from the date of grant. The exercise price per common share under the Plan generally may not be below 100% of the fair market value of a common share at the date of grant.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

All restricted stock awards granted during fiscal year 2018 vest 1/5th per year over a five year period and all dividends paid on unvested shares are reinvested in additional shares of restricted stock subject to the same vesting schedule. The following table sets forth, for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, information regarding individual grants of restricted stock and individual grants of stock options made under the Plan during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018:

80
Table of Contents

Name Grant
Date
 All Other
Stock
Awards;
Number of
Shares of
Restricted
Stock (1)
  All Other
Stock
Awards;
Number of
Shares of
Unrestricted
Stock (2)
  All Other
Option
Awards;
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Options (3)
  Exercise Price of
Option Award
or Fair Value Per
Share at Grant
Date of Stock
Award
  Grant Date
FairValue
 
Eugene W. Landy 1/3/18  -0-   -0-   65,000  $17.80  $119,600(4)
Eugene W. Landy 1/16/18  -0-   71   -0-  $17.05  $1,211 
Eugene W. Landy 3/27/18  -0-   82   -0-  $14.64  $1,200 
Eugene W. Landy 6/19/18  -0-   77   -0-  $15.59  $1,200 
Eugene W. Landy 9/13/18  -0-   70   -0-  $17.31  $1,212 
Michael P. Landy 10/3/17  12,500   -0-   -0-  $16.47  $205,875 
Michael P. Landy 1/16/18  -0-   71   -0-  $17.05  $1,211 
Michael P. Landy 3/27/18  -0-   82   -0-  $14.64  $1,200 
Michael P. Landy 6/19/18  -0-   77   -0-  $15.59  $1,200 
Michael P. Landy 9/13/18  -0-   70   -0-  $17.31  $1,212 
Kevin S. Miller 1/16/18  -0-   71   -0-  $17.05  $1,211 
Kevin S. Miller 3/27/18  -0-   82   -0-  $14.64  $1,200 
Kevin S. Miller 6/19/18  -0-   77   -0-  $15.59  $1,200 
Kevin S. Miller 9/13/18  -0-   70   -0-  $17.31  $1,212 

(1)Represents restricted common stock which vests 1/5th every October 3rd over the next five years. Fair value on the date of grant was $16.47 per share.
(2)Comprises an annual directors’ fee paid to Mr. Eugene W. Landy, Mr. Michael P. Landy and Mr. Kevin S. Miller in the form of 300 shares of unrestricted common stock each (900 shares total) valued at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.
(3)These options expire 8 years from grant date and are exercisable 1 year after grant date.
(4)This value was established using the Black-Scholes stock option valuation model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the model: expected volatility of 16.45%; risk-free interest rate of 2.37%; dividend yield of 3.82%; expected life of options of 8 years; and -0- estimated forfeitures. The fair value per share granted was $1.84. The actual value of the options will depend upon our performance during the period of time the options are outstanding and the price of our common stock on the date of exercise.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Our executive compensation policies and practices, pursuant to which the compensation set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table was paid or awarded to our Named Executive Officers, are described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and below under “Employment Agreements.”

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth summary information concerning options exercised and vesting of stock awards for each of the Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018:

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018
  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
  Value Realized on
Exercise (1)
($)
  Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
  Value realized on
Vesting
($)
 
Eugene W. Landy  -0-   -0-   10,578  $181,082(2)
Michael P. Landy  -0-   -0-   4,230   71,122(3)
Kevin S. Miller  -0-   -0-   7,960   133,818(4)
Allison Nagelberg  -0-   -0-   1,165   19,607(5)

81
Table of Contents

(1)Value realized based on the difference between the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of exercise less the exercise price of the stock option.
(2)Value realized based on the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of vesting made up of 1,165 shares vested on 7/5/18 at $16.83 per share; 9,113 shares vested on 9/14/18 at $17.19 per share and 300 shares issued throughout fiscal 2018 in connection with annual director fees which vested at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.
(3)Value realized based on the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of vesting made up of 3,494 shares vested on 7/5/18 at $16.83 per share; 436 shares vested on 9/14/18 at $17.19 per share and 300 shares issued throughout fiscal 2018 in connection with annual director fees which vested at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.
(4)Value realized based on the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of vesting made up of 7,454 shares vested on 7/5/18 at $16.83 per share, 206 shares vested on 9/14/18 at $17.19 per share and 300 shares issued throughout fiscal 2018 in connection with annual director fees which vested at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.
(5)Value realized based on the closing price of the shares on the NYSE as of the date of vesting made up of 1,165 shares vested on 7/5/18 at $16.83 per share.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, information regarding stock options and restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2018:

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018
  Option Awards  Restricted Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
  Option
exercise
price ($)
  Option
expiration
date
  Number of
Shares That
Have Not Vested
  Market Value
Of Shares that Have
Not Vested (2)
 
Eugene W. Landy                  30,055(3) $502,514 
   -0-   65,000(1) $17.80   01/03/26         
   65,000   -0-   15.04   01/04/25         
   65,000   -0-   10.37   01/05/24         
   65,000   -0-   11.16   01/05/23         
   65,000   -0-   8.94   01/03/22         
   65,000   -0-   10.46   01/03/21         
   65,000   -0-   9.33   01/03/20         
   65,000   -0-   8.72   01/03/19         
                         
Michael P. Landy  -0-   -0-  $-0-   -   21,430(4) $358,309 
                         
Kevin S. Miller  40,000   -0-  $14.24   12/09/24   8,047(5) $134,553 
                         
Allison Nagelberg  30,000   -0-  $14.24   12/09/24   2,354(6) $39,363 

(1)These options will become exercisable on January 3, 2019.
(2)Based on the closing price of our common stock on September 30, 2018 of $16.72. Restricted stock awards vest over 5 years.
(3)2,354 shares vest 1/2 on July 5th over the next 2 years; 470 shares vest 1/2 on September 14th over the next 2 years; 26,392 shares vest 1/3rd on September 14th over the next 3 years and 839 shares vest 1/4thon September 14th over the next 4 years.
(4)7,062 shares vest 1/2 on July 5th over the next 2 years; and 470 shares vest 1/2 on September 14th over the next 2 years; 839 shares vest 1/4th on September 14th over the next 4 years and 13,059 shares vest 1/5thon October 3rd over the next 5 years.
(5)2,500 shares vest on July 5, 2019; 4,708 shares vest 1/2 on July 5th over the next 2 years and 839 shares vest 1/4thon September 14th over the next 4 years.
(6)2,354 shares vest 1/2 on July 5th over the next 2 years.

Employment Agreements

Eugene W. Landy, our Chairman of the Board, executed an Employment Agreement on December 9, 1994, which was amended on June 26, 1997 (First Amendment), on November 5, 2003 (Second Amendment), on April 1, 2008 (Third Amendment), on July 1, 2010 (Fourth Amendment), on April 25, 2013 (Fifth Amendment), on December 20, 2013 (Sixth Amendment), on December 18, 2014 (Seventh Amendment) and on January 12, 2016 (Eighth Amendment) – collectively, the “Amended Employment Agreement”. Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Eugene Landy’s base salary was $410,000 per year, effective January 1, 2015, and was increased pursuant to the Eighth Amendment to $430,500 per year, effective January 1, 2016. He is entitled to receive pension payments of $50,000 per year through 2020; in fiscal 2018, we accrued $11,043 in additional compensation expense related to the pension benefits. Mr. Eugene Landy’s incentive bonus schedule is detailed in the Fourth Amendment and is based on progress toward achieving certain target levels of growth in market capitalization, funds from operations and dividends per share. Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Eugene Landy will receive each year an option to purchase 65,000 Common Shares. Mr. Eugene Landy is entitled to five weeks paid vacation annually, and he is entitled to participate in our employee benefit plans.

82
Table of Contents

The Amended Employment Agreement provides for aggregate severance payments of $500,000, payable to Mr. Eugene Landy upon the termination of his employment for any reason in increments of $100,000 per year for five years. He is entitled to disability payments in the event of his disability (as defined in the Amended Employment Agreement) for a period of three years equal to his base salary. The Amended Employment Agreement provides for a death benefit of $500,000, payable to Mr. Eugene Landy’s designated beneficiary. Upon the termination of Mr. Eugene Landy’s employment, following, or as a result of, certain types of transactions that lead to a significant increase in our market capitalization, the Amended Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Eugene Landy will receive a grant of 35,000 to 65,000 Common Shares, depending on the amount of the increase in our market capitalization, all of his outstanding options to purchase Common Shares will become immediately vested, and he will be entitled to continue to receive benefits under our health insurance and similar plans for one year. In the event of a change in control, Mr. Eugene Landy shall receive a lump sum payment of $2,500,000, provided that the sale price is at least $10 per share of common stock. A change of control is defined as the consummation of a reorganization, merger, share exchange, consolidation, or sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets. This change of control provision will not apply to any combination between us and UMH. Payment will be made simultaneously with the closing of the transaction, and only in the event that the transaction closes. The Amended Employment Agreement is terminable by our Board of Directors at any time by reason of Mr. Eugene Landy’s death or disability or for cause, which is defined in the Amended Employment Agreement as a termination of the agreement if our Board of Directors determines in good faith that Mr. Eugene Landy failed to substantially perform his duties to us (other than due to his death or disability), or has engaged in conduct the consequences of which are materially adverse to us, monetarily or otherwise. Upon termination of the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Eugene Landy will remain entitled to the disability, severance, death and pension benefits provided for in the Amended Employment Agreement.

Effective April 9, 2013, Michael P. Landy was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to April 9, 2013, Mr. Michael Landy was the Chief Operating Officer. Effective October 1, 2013, Michael Landy entered into a three-year employment agreement with us, under which Mr. Michael Landy received an annual base salary of $500,000 for fiscal year 2014 with increases of 5% for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, plus bonuses and customary fringe benefits. On January 11, 2016, we entered into an amended and restated Employment Agreement (Employment Agreement) with Mr. Michael Landy, which became effective October 1, 2016. Upon signing the Employment Agreement, Mr. Michael Landy received a signing bonus of $400,000 in recognition of the substantial progress that we have made under his leadership. Effective October 1, 2016, Mr. Michael Landy receives an annual base salary of $750,000 for fiscal year 2017 with increases of 5% for each of fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, plus targeted bonuses and customary fringe benefits. The Employment Agreement has an initial term of five years, and is renewed automatically for a new five-year term on the first day of each calendar quarter after the effective date unless otherwise terminated. For fiscal years after 2021, Mr. Michael Landy’s base salary shall be set by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors but will be no less than his base salary for the preceding year. Mr. Michael Landy will receive annual cash bonuses based on our achievement of certain performance objectives as determined by the Compensation Committee: a) Growth in Market Cap of 10%, 15% or 20%, Mr. Michael Landy will receive $40,000, $60,000 or $80,000, respectively; b) Growth in AFFO per share of 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20%, Mr. Michael Landy will receive $50,000, $75,000, $100,000 or $150,000, respectively; and c) Growth in Dividend per Share of 5%, 10% or 15%, Mr. Michael Landy will receive $150,000, $200,000 or $250,000, respectively. Mr. Michael Landy will also be entitled to equity awards of up to 25,000 shares of restricted stock each year based on achievement of performance objectives as determined by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Michael Landy also receives four weeks’ vacation annually and he is entitled to customary fringe benefits including life insurance, health benefits and the right to participate in our 401(k) retirement plan. We reimburse Mr. Michael Landy for the cost of a disability insurance policy such that, in the event of Mr. Michael Landy’s disability for a period of more than 90 days, Mr. Michael Landy will receive benefits up to 60% of his then-current salary. Under the Employment Agreement, if Mr. Michael Landy’s employment is terminated for any reason, either voluntarily or involuntarily, including the death of Mr. Michael Landy or termination for cause, Mr. Michael Landy shall be entitled to the base salary plus base target bonuses due under the Employment Agreement for the remaining term of the Employment Agreement (as it has been renewed). The Employment Agreement also provides that, upon a change of control (as defined below), the Employment Agreement will automatically renew for five years from the date of the change in control and Mr. Michael Landy shall have the right to terminate the Employment Agreement and continue to receive the base salary plus base target bonuses and restricted stock awards he would have been entitled to receive during the remaining term of the Employment Agreement. In addition, provided that Mr. Michael Landy is actively employed by us as of the consummation of a change of control, Mr. Michael Landy shall be entitled to a transaction bonus consistent with the terms of any applicable transaction bonus plan that we may adopt. The term “Change of Control” under Mr. Michael Landy’s amended employment agreement means (i) a sale of substantially all of our assets, not in the ordinary course, to an unaffiliated third party, (ii) the transfer, in one transaction or a series of transactions, to an unaffiliated third party, of outstanding shares of our capital stock representing a majority of the then outstanding voting stock, (iii) a majority of our Directors ceasing to be individuals who either were members of the Board immediately following our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or whose election as a director was approved by a majority of such incumbent directors or their approved successors, (iv) a merger or consolidation having the same effect as item (i), (ii) or (iii) above or (iv) any other event of a nature that would be required to be reported as a change of control in item 5.01 of Form 8-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or any successor provision thereto).

83
Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 2016, Kevin S. Miller entered into a new three-year employment agreement with us, under which Mr. Miller will receive an annual base salary of $360,000 for calendar year 2016 with increases of 5% for each of calendar years 2017 and 2018, plus bonuses and customary fringe benefits. Mr. Miller also receives four weeks’ vacation, annually. We reimburse Mr. Miller for the cost of a disability insurance policy such that, in the event of Mr. Miller’s disability for a period of more than 90 days, Mr. Miller will receive benefits up to 60% of his then-current salary. In the event of a merger, sale or change of voting control, excluding transactions between us and UMH, Mr. Miller will have the right to extend and renew the employment agreement so that the expiration date will be three years from the date of merger, sale or change of voting control, or Mr. Miller may terminate the employment agreement and be entitled to receive the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s base salary at the date of termination, paid monthly over the remaining term or life of the agreement. If there is a termination of employment by us or by Mr. Miller for any reason, either involuntary or voluntary, including the death of the employee, other than a termination for cause as defined by the agreement, Mr. Miller shall be entitled to the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s base salary at the date of termination, paid monthly over the remaining term or life of the agreement.

Effective January 1, 2017, Ms. Allison Nagelberg entered into a new three-year employment agreement with us, under which Ms. Nagelberg receives an annual base salary of $358,313 for calendar year 2017, with increases of 5% for each of calendar years 2018 and 2019, plus bonuses and customary fringe benefits. Under the employment agreement, Ms. Nagelberg receives four weeks’ vacation, annually. We reimburse Ms. Nagelberg for the cost of a disability insurance policy such that, in the event of Ms. Nagelberg’s disability for a period of more than 90 days, Ms. Nagelberg will receive benefits up to 60% of her then-current salary. In the event of a merger, sale or change of voting control, excluding transactions between us and UMH, Ms. Nagelberg will have the right to extend and renew this employment agreement so that the expiration date will be three years from the date of merger, sale or change of voting control, or Ms. Nagelberg may terminate the employment agreement and be entitled to receive one year’s compensation in accordance with the agreement. If there is a termination of employment by us or Ms. Nagelberg for any reason, either involuntary or voluntary, including the death of the employee, other than a termination for cause as defined by the agreement, Ms. Nagelberg shall be entitled to the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s compensation at the date of termination, paid monthly over the remaining term or life of the agreement.

84
Table of Contents

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change-in-Control

Under the employment agreements with our President and Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers listed below, our President and Chief Executive Officer and such other Named Executive Officers are entitled to receive the following estimated payments and benefits upon a termination of employment or voluntary resignation (with or without a change-in-control). These disclosed amounts are estimates only and do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that would be paid to the Named Executive Officers, which would only be known at the time that they become eligible for payment and would only be payable if a termination of employment, or voluntary resignation, were to occur. The table below reflects the amount that could be payable under the various arrangements assuming that the termination of employment had occurred at September 30, 2018. Each of the employees named in the table below have restricted stock awards and/or stock option awards which are listed in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table previously disclosed. Restricted Stock Awards vest upon the termination of an employee due to death or disability. In addition, restricted stock awards vest on the date of an involuntary termination of employment or if the employee retires. If the termination of employment is for any other reason, including voluntary resignation, termination not for cause or good reason resignation, termination for cause, or termination not for cause or good reason (after a change in control), the restricted stock awards are forfeited. Regarding the stock option awards, if the termination is for any reason other than a termination for cause, the stock option awards may be exercised until three months after the termination of employment. If the termination is for cause, the stock option awards are forfeited.

   

Voluntary

Resignation

on

9/30/18

   

Termination

Not for Cause

Or

Good Reason

Resignation

on

9/30/18

   

Termination

For Cause

on

9/30/18

   

Termination

Not for Cause or Good

Reason Resignation

(After a Change-in-Control)

on

9/30/18

   

Disability/

Death on

9/30/18

 
Eugene W. Landy  $530,110(3)  $530,110(3)  $508,279(2)  $3,030,110(4)  $1,821,610(5)
Michael P. Landy  4,429,983(6)  4,429,983(6)  4,429,983(6)  4,429,983(6)  4,429,983(6)
Kevin S. Miller  396,900(7)  396,900(7)  7,633(1)  396,900(7)  396,900(7)
Allison Nagelberg  489,097(8)  489,097(8)  7,235(1)  489,097(8)  489,097(8)

(1)Consists of accrued vacation time, which would be payable in a lump sum payment.
(2)Consists of severance payments of $500,000, payable $100,000 per year for 5 years, and $8,279 of accrued vacation, which would be payable in a lump sum payment.
(3)Consists of severance payments of $500,000, payable $100,000 per year for 5 years, plus the $21,832 estimated cost of continuation of benefits for one year following termination and $8,279 of accrued vacation, which would be payable in a lump sum payment.
(4)Mr. Eugene W. Landy shall receive a lump-sum payment of $2,500,000 in the event of a change in control, provided that the sale price of our common stock is at least $10 per share. In addition, if Mr. Eugene W. Landy’s employment agreement is terminated, he receives severance payments of $500,000, which would be payable $100,000 per year for 5 years, continuation of benefits for one year following termination and accrued vacation.
(5)In the event of a disability, as defined in the agreement, Mr. Eugene W. Landy shall receive disability payments equal to his base salary for a period of three years, continuation of benefits for one year following termination and accrued vacation. He has a death benefit of $500,000 payable in a lump sum to Mr. Eugene W. Landy’s beneficiary.
(6)Payments are calculated based on Mr. Michael P. Landy’s amended and restated employment agreement, which became effective October 1, 2016, which is the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement.
(7)Payments are calculated based on Mr. Kevin S. Miller’s employment agreement, which is the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s base salary at the date of termination.
(8)Payments are calculated based on Ms. Allison Nagelberg’s employment agreement which is the greater of the base salary due under the remaining term of the agreement or one year’s compensation at the date of termination.

Compensation Risk

The Compensation Committee has assessed our compensation program for the purpose of viewing and considering any risks presented by our compensation policies and practices that are likely to have a material adverse effect on us. As part of that assessment, we reviewed the primary elements of our compensation program, including base salary, annual bonus opportunities, equity compensation and severance arrangements. Our risk assessment included a review of the overall design of each primary element of our compensation program, and an analysis of the various design features, controls and approval rights in place with respect to compensation paid to management and other employees that mitigate potential risks to us that could arise from our compensation program. Following the assessment, we determined that our compensation policies and practices did not create risks that were reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us and reported the results of the assessment to the Compensation Committee.

85
Table of Contents

Director Compensation

Effective September 12, 2017, the annual cash directors’ fee increased from $41,000 to $48,000, plus an additional amount to be paid in our unrestricted common stock valued at $4,800 for a total annual directors’ fee of $52,800. This annual directors’ fee will be paid quarterly. Effective in fiscal 2018, Directors received an increase in their meeting attendance fee from $4,000 to $5,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, and they will continue to receive $500 for each telephonic Board meeting attended. Directors appointed to Board committees will continue to receive $1,200 for each committee meeting attended.

The table below sets forth a summary of director compensation for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018:

  Annual
Board Cash
  Meeting  Committee  Unrestricted
Stock
    
Director Retainer  Fees  Fees  Awards (6)  Total Fees 
                
Kiernan Conway $12,000  $5,000  $-0-  $1,212  $18,212 
Daniel D. Cronheim  48,000   20,500   -0-   4,823   73,323 
Catherine B. Elflein (1)  48,000   20,500   4,800   4,823   78,123 
Brian H. Haimm (1)(2)(3)(5)  48,000   20,500   6,500   4,823   79,823 
Neal Herstik  48,000   20,500   -0-   4,823   73,323 
Matthew I. Hirsch (1)(2)(3)(4)  48,000   20,500   7,000   4,823   80,323 
Samuel A. Landy  48,000   20,500   -0-   4,823   73,323 
Gregory T. Otto (3)(4)  48,000   20,500   500   4,823   73,823 
Scott L. Robinson (1)  48,000   20,500   4,800   4,823   78,123 
Stephen B. Wolgin (1)(4)  48,000   20,500   7,000   4,823   80,323 
Total $444,000  $189,500  $30,600  $44,619  $708,719 

Mr. Eugene W. Landy, Mr. Michael P. Landy and Mr. Kevin S. Miller are Named Executive Officers. As such, their director compensation is included in the Summary Compensation Table.

(1)The Audit Committee for 2018 consists of Mr. Haimm (Chairman), Mr. Hirsch, Mr. Wolgin, Mr. Robinson and Ms. Elflein.
(2)These directors acted as chairs of the Board’s Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees.
(3)Mr. Haimm (Chairman), Mr. Hirsch and Mr. Otto are members of the Compensation Committee.
(4)Mr. Hirsch (Chairman), Mr. Otto and Mr. Wolgin are members of the Nominating and Governance Committee.
(5)Mr. Haimm is the Lead Independent Director whose role is to preside over the executive sessions of the non-management directors.
(6)Comprises an annual directors’ fee paid in the form of 2,770 unrestricted shares of common stock valued at a weighted average price of $16.10 per share.

Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Except as provided in the specific employment agreement for Mr. Eugene W. Landy, as described above, we do not have pension or other post-employment plans in effect for officers, directors or employees or a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The present value of accumulated benefit of contractual pension benefits for Mr. Eugene W. Landy is $543,946 as of September 30, 2018. Payments made during the 2018 fiscal year were $50,000. He is entitled to receive pension payments of $50,000 per year through 2020. Our employees may elect to participate in our 401(k) plan, which is administered by UMH.

Other Information

Daniel D. Cronheim is one of our directors and is also an Executive Vice President of David Cronheim Company (Cronheim) and Cronheim Management Services, Inc. (CMSI). Daniel Cronheim received $73,323, $75,880 and $49,500 for director’s fees in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We have not paid any fees to The David Cronheim Mortgage Corporation, an affiliated company of CMSI, over the last three fiscal years.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As of September 30, 2018, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Haimm (Chairman), Hirsch and Otto. No member of the Compensation Committee is a current or former officer or employee of the Company. In fiscal 2018, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee of any entity, or board of directors of any entity that did not have a compensation committee, that had one or more of its executive officers serving on our Compensation Committee. The members of the Compensation Committee did not otherwise have any relationships requiring related-party disclosure in our Annual Report.

86
Table of Contents

ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table lists information with respectrequired by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the beneficial ownershipdefinitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of our common and preferred stock as of September 30, 2018 by:stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A, in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

each person known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of our outstanding Common Shares;
our directors;
our executive officers; and
all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of the person or persons named below is c/o Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, Juniper Business Plaza, 3499 Route 9 North, Suite 3-D, Freehold, New Jersey 07728. In determining the number and percentage of Shares beneficially owned by each person, Shares that may be acquired by that person under options exercisable within sixty (60) days of September 30, 2018 are deemed beneficially owned by that person and are deemed outstanding for purposes of determining the total number of outstanding Common Shares for that person and are not deemed outstanding for that purpose for all other shareholders.

 

Common Shares

  Series C Preferred Shares 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and Nature of Beneficial

Ownership (1)

  

Percentage

of Common

Shares

Outstanding (2)

  

Amount and Nature of Beneficial

Ownership (1)

  

Percentage

of Preferred

Shares

Outstanding (3)

 
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355 (4)
  7,951,515   9.76%       

BlackRock, Inc.

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022 (5)

  7,437,398   9.13%       

Wasatch Financial Advisors

505 Wakara Way, 3rd Floor

Salt Lake City, UT 84108 (6)

  

6,444,876

   7.91%       
Kiernan Conway  70   *        
Daniel D. Cronheim (7)  173,563   *        
Catherine B. Elflein (8)  15,922   *        
Brian H. Haimm (9)  14,081   *        
Neal Herstik (10)  20,126   *   2,800   * 
Matthew I. Hirsch (11)  78,736   *        
Eugene W. Landy (12)  2,077,224   2.53%       
Michael P. Landy (13)  638,668   *        
Samuel A. Landy (14)  352,241   *        
Kevin S. Miller (15)  84,838   *        
Allison Nagelberg (16)  114,098   *        
Gregory T. Otto (17)  905   *        
Scott L. Robinson (18)  8,632   *        
Katie Rytter (19)  29,316   *   370       * 
Stephen B. Wolgin (20)  74,890   *   14,013   * 
Directors and Executive Officers as a group  3,683,310   4.49%  17,183   * 

87
Table of Contents

*Less than 1%.

(1)Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the Company believes that the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Common and Preferred Shares listed.
(2)Based on the number of Common Shares outstanding on September 30, 2018, which was 81,503,134.
(3)Based on the number of Preferred Shares outstanding on September 30, 2018, which was 11,488,001.
(4)Based on Schedule 13F filed with the SEC, The Vanguard Group, Inc. owns 7,951,515 Common Shares as of September 30, 2018.
(5)Based on Schedule 13F filed with the SEC, BlackRock, Inc. owns 7,437,398 Common Shares as of September 30, 2018.
(6)Based on Schedule 13F filed with the SEC, Wasatch Financial Advisors owns 6,444,876 Common Shares as of September 30, 2018.
(7)Includes (a) 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 80,000 Common Shares held in a trust for Mr. Cronheim’s two minor family members, to which he has sole dispositive and voting power; and (c) 79,499 Common Shares pledged in a margin account.
(8)Includes (a) 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 3,500 Common Shares owned jointly with Ms. Elflein’s husband.
(9)Includes 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock.
(10)Includes (a) 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 1,600 Common Shares owned by Mr. Herstik’s wife. As of September 30, 2018, Mr. Herstik also owned 2,400 of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock and 400 shares of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock are owned by the Gross, Truss & Herstik Profit Sharing Plan over which Mr. Herstik has shared voting power and shared dispositive power.
(11)Includes (a) 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 3,069 Common Shares owned by Mr. Hirsch’s wife.
(12)Includes (a) 30,055 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 97,914 Common Shares owned by Mr. Eugene Landy’s wife; (c) 221,427 Common Shares held in the Landy & Landy Employees’ Profit Sharing Plan of which Mr. Landy is a trustee and has shared voting and dispositive power; (d) 188,294 Common Shares held in the Landy & Landy Employees’ Pension Plan over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (e) 13,048 Common Shares held in Landy Investments Ltd., over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (f) 179,405 Common Shares held in the Eugene W. and Gloria Landy Family Foundation, a charitable trust, over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (g) 39,361 Common Shares held by Juniper Plaza Associates, over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (h) 29,527 Common Shares held by Windsor Industrial Park Associates, over which Mr. Landy has shared voting and dispositive power; (i) 476,451 Common Shares pledged in a margin account; and (j) 409,017 Common Shares pledged as security for loans. Includes 455,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2018. Excludes 65,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option not exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2018.
(13)Includes (a) 21,430 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 35,655 Common Shares owned by Mr. Michael Landy’s wife; (c) 169,457 Common Shares held in custodial accounts for Mr. Landy’s children under the New Jersey Uniform Transfer to Minors Act; (d) 53,000 Common Shares held by EWL Grandchildren Fund, LLC over which Mr. Landy has shared voting power and shared dispositive power; (e) 25,431 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Mr. Landy’s benefit; and (f) 157,650 Common Shares pledged in a margin account.
(14)Includes (a) 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 24,940 Common Shares owned by Mr. Samuel Landy’s wife; (c) 22,379 Common Shares held by the Samuel Landy Family Limited Partnership; (d) 53,000 Common Shares held in EWL Grandchildren Fund, LLC over which Mr. Landy has shared voting power and shared dispositive power; (e) 40,764 Common Shares pledged in a margin account; (f) 171,654 Common Shares pledged as security for a loan; and (g) 70,963 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Mr. Landy’s benefit. As a co-trustee of the UMH 401(k) Plan, Mr. Landy has shared voting power, but no dispositive power, over the 188,495 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan. He, however, disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the Common Shares held by the UMH 401(k) Plan, except for the 70,963 Common Shares held by the UMH 401(k) Plan for his benefit.
(15)Includes (a) 8,047 shares of unvested restricted stock and (b) 1,460 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Mr. Kevin S. Miller’s benefit. Includes 40,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option that is exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2018.
(16)Includes (a) 2,354 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 3,619 Common Shares owned by Ms. Nagelberg’s husband; (c) 1,783 Common Shares held in custodial accounts for Ms. Nagelberg’s children under the New Jersey Uniform Transfers to Minors Act with respect to which she has sole dispositive and voting power; and (d) 13,839 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Ms. Nagelberg’s benefit. Includes 30,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option that is exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2018.
(17)Includes 600 shares pledged in a margin account.
(18)Includes 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock.
(19)Includes (a) 942 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 360 Common Shares held in custodial accounts for Ms. Rytter’s son and nephew; and (c) 998 Common Shares held in the UMH 401(k) Plan for Ms. Rytter’s benefit. Ms. Rytter’s husband owns 370 shares of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock. Includes 20,000 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of a stock option that is exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2018.
(20)Includes (a) 1,308 shares of unvested restricted stock; (b) 4,203 Common Shares owned by Mr. Wolgin’s wife; and (c) 194 Common Shares pledged in a margin account. As of September 30, 2018, Mr. Wolgin also owned 12,013 shares of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, with 12,013 Preferred C Shares pledged in a margin account. Mr. Wolgin’s wife also owns 2,000 shares of the Company’s 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock.

88
Table of Contents

ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers, except that Samuel A. Landy, a director and Michael P. Landy, President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director, are the sons of Eugene W. Landy, the Chairman of the Board and an Executive Director.

Daniel D. CronheimThe information required by this item is one of our directors and is also an Executive Vice President of David Cronheim Company (Cronheim) and Cronheim Management Services, Inc. (CMSI). Daniel Cronheim received $73,323, $75,880 and $49,500 for director’s fees in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We have not paid any fees to The David Cronheim Mortgage Corporation, an affiliated company of CMSI, over the last three fiscal years.

Five of our 13 directors are also directors and shareholders of UMH. We hold common and preferred stock of UMH in our securities portfolio. See Note 6 of the Notesincorporated herein by reference to the Consolidated Financial Statements includeddefinitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A, in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

ITEM 14 - PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Form 10-K for current holdings. During fiscal 2018, we made total purchases of 59,905 common shares of UMH for a total cost of $828,787, or a weighted average cost of $13.84 per share, which were purchased through UMH’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. During fiscal 2018, UMH made total purchases of 101,304 of our common shares through our DRIP for a total cost of $1,566,624, or a weighted average cost of $15.46 per share.

As of September 30, 2018, we had 14 full-time employees and one part-time employee. Our Chairman of the Boarditem is also the Chairman of the Board of UMH. Other than our Chairman of the Board, we do not share any employees with UMH.

Effective January 12, 2015, we entered into a seven-year lease agreement to occupy 5,680 square feet for our current corporate office space. Rent for our current corporate office space is at an annual rate of $99,400 or $17.50 per square foot for years one through five and an annual rate of $100,820 or $17.75 per square foot for years six and seven. We are also responsible for our proportionate share of real estate taxes and common area maintenance. Mr. Eugene W. Landy, the Founder and Chairman of the Board, owns a 24% interest in the entity that is the landlord of the property where our corporate office space is currently located. We believe that the aforesaid rent is no more than what we would pay for comparable space elsewhere.

No director, executive officer, or any immediate family member of such director or executive officer may enter into any transaction or arrangement with us without the prior approval of the Board of Directors. If any such transaction or arrangement is proposed, the Board of Directors will appoint a Business Judgment Committee consisting of independent directors who are also independent of the transaction or arrangement. This Committee will recommendincorporated herein by reference to the Boarddefinitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of Directors approval or disapproval ofstockholders to be filed with the transaction or arrangement. In determining whetherSEC pursuant to approve such a transaction or arrangement, the Business Judgment Committee will take into account, among other factors, whether the transaction was on terms no less favorableRegulation 14A, in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to us than terms generally available to third parties and the extent of the executive officer’s or director’s involvement in such transaction or arrangement. While we do not have specific written standards for approving such related party transactions, such transactions are only approved if it is in our best interest or in the best interest of our shareholders. Additionally, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires all directors, officers and employees who may have a potential or apparent conflict of interest to immediately notify our General Counsel. Further, to identify related party transactions, we submit and require our directors and executive officers to complete director and officer questionnaires identifying any transactions with us in which the director, executive officer or their immediate family members have an interest.Form 10-K.

See identification and other information relating to independent directors under Item 10.

8957
Table of Contents

ITEM 14 - PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP served as our independent registered public accountants for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. A representative from PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP is expected to be present at the annual shareholders’ meeting in order to be available to respond to possible inquiries from shareholders.

The following are fees billed by and accrued to PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP in connection with services rendered for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:

  2018  2017 
Audit Fees $224,900  $217,000 
Audit Related Fees  31,100   40,300 
Tax Fees  51,400   49,500 
All Other Fees  -0-   -0- 
Total Fees $307,400  $306,800 

Audit fees include professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, management’s assessment of internal controls, and reviews of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

Audit related fees include services that are normally provided by our independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, such as consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Tax fees include professional services rendered for the preparation of our federal and state corporate tax returns and supporting schedules as may be required by the Internal Revenue Service and applicable state taxing authorities. Tax fees also include other work directly affecting or supporting the payment of taxes, including planning and research of various tax issues.

All of the services performed by PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP for us during fiscal 2018 were either expressly pre-approved by the Audit Committee or were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy, and the Audit Committee was provided with regular updates as to the nature of such services and fees paid for such services.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services provided by our principal independent accountants. The policy requires that all services provided by our independent registered public accountants to us, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services, must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, and all have been so approved. The pre-approval requirements do not prohibit day-to-day normal tax consulting services, which matters will not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate.

The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP’s independence.

90
Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS,EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

PAGE(S)
(a) (1)(1)The following Financial Statements are filed as part of this report:
(i)(i)Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm9663
(ii)(ii)Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017202097-9864-65
(iii)(iii)

Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019

99-100

66-67

(iv)(iv)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019

101

68

(v)(v)

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019

102-103

69-70

(vi)(vi)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019

104

71

(vii)(vii)Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements105-14272-106
(a) (2)(2)

The following Financial Statement Schedule is filed as part of this report:

(i)(i)

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of September 30, 20182021

143-151107-120

All other schedules are omitted for the reason thatbecause they are not required, are not applicable, or the required information is set forth in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes hereto.

9158
Table of Contents

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS,EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONT’D)

(a)(3)Exhibits
(2)Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation, or Succession
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger Among Industrial Logistics Properties Trust, Maple Delaware Merger Sub LLC and Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation dated as of November 5, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2021, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2021, Registration No. 001-33177).
2.2

Agreement and Plan of Merger Among Equity Commonwealth, EQC Maple Industrial, LLC and Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation dated as of May 4, 2021, as amended and restated as of August 15, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Amendment dated August 18, 2021 to the Joint Proxy Statement /Prospectus dated July 23, 2021, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 18, 2021, Registration No. 001-33177).

2.3

Agreement and Plan of Merger Among Monmouth Capital Corporation, Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, and Route 9 Acquisition, Inc., dated as of March 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2007, Registration No. 001-33177).

   
(3) Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
3.1Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form S-3 filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 2009, Registration No. 333-161668).
3.2Articles of Amendment, effective April 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on April 19, 2010, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.3Articles of Amendment, effective March 7, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2011, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.4Articles of Amendment, effective January 26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2012, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.5Articles of Amendment, effective May 27, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5.03 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 28, 2014, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.6Articles of Amendment, effective December 4, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2019, Registration No. 001-33177).

3.7

Articles Supplementary, effective September 7, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the Form 8-A filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.7

3.8

Certificate of Correction, effective March 7, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177).
3.83.9Articles Supplementary, effective March 7, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177).

3.959
Table of Contents

3.10

Articles Supplementary, effective June 29, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177).

3.103.11Articles Supplementary, effective August 2, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2018, Registration No. 001-33177).

92
Table of Contents3.12Articles Supplementary, effective December 4, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2019, Registration No. 001-33177).

3.11

3.13

Bylaws of the Company, as amended and restated, dated April 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2014, Registration No. 001-33177).

(4)
(4)Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
4.1Specimen certificate representing the common stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2015, Registration No. 001-33177).
4.2Specimen certificate representing the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the form 8-A filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).
(10)4.3*Material ContractsDescription of Securities
10.1(10)+Material Contracts
10.1+Employment Agreement - Mr. Eugene W. Landy dated December 9, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Form 10-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 28, 1994).
10.2+First Amendment to Employment Agreement - Mr. Eugene W. Landy dated June 26, 1997 (incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Committee on December 10, 2009, Registration No. 001-33177).
10.3+Second Amendment to Employment Agreement - Mr. Eugene W. Landy dated November 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Committee on April 1, 2004, Registration No. 000-04248).
10.4+Third Amendment to Employment Agreement - Eugene W. Landy, dated April 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2008, Registration No. 001-33177).
10.5+Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated July 13, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2010, Registration No. 001-33177).
10.6+Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated April 25, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2013, Registration No. 001-33177).

60
Table of Contents

10.7+
10.7+Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated December 20, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2013, Registration No. 001-33177).
10.8+Seventh Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated December 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2014, Registration No. 001-33177).
10.9+Eighth Amendment to Employment Agreement – Eugene W. Landy, dated January 12, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).

93
Table of Contents10.10+

10.10+Amended and Restated Employment Agreement – Kevin S. Miller, dated January 5, 2016August 19, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2016,August 19, 2019, Registration No. 001-33177).
10.11+Employment Agreement - Michael P. Landy, dated January 11, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 11, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).
10.12+Employment Agreement – Allison Nagelberg,- Michael P. Landy, dated January 3, 2017August 24, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 4, 2017,August 24, 2020, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.13

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation’s 2007 Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Committee on March 26, 2010, Registration No.001-33177).

10.14Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation’s 2007 Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Proxy Statement filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Committee on March 31, 2017, Registration No.001-33177).
10.15+

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement and Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 and 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2017, Registration No. 001-33177)

10.16+

Change in Control Severance Plan of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2021, Registration No. 001-33177)

10.17+

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation and its Directors and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2012, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.1710.18

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (incorporated by reference to Form S-3D filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 1, 2018, Registration No. 333-225374).

61
Table of Contents

10.19
10.18

Credit Agreement by and among Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, Bank of Montreal, as administrative agent, BMO Capital Markets, as sole lease arranger and sole book runner, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-syndication agents, dated as of August 27, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2015, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.1910.20

First Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, Bank of Montreal, as administrative agent, BMO Capital Markets, as sole lease arranger and sole book runner, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-syndication agents, dated as of September 30, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2016, Registration No. 001-33177).

10.2010.21Second Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, Bank of Montreal, as administrative agent, BMO Capital Markets, as sole lease arranger and sole book runner, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-syndication agents, dated as of March 22, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2018, Registration No. 001-33177).

94
Table of Contents10.22

10.21At-the-Market SalesAmended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and betweendated November 15, 2019, among Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, and FBRas borrower, the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of Montreal, as administrative agent, BMO Capital Markets & Co.Corp., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as joint lead arrangers and joint book runners, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-syndication agents. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.110.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2018,November 18, 2019, Registration No. 001-33177).
(21)*Subsidiaries of the Registrant.Registrant
(23)*Consent of PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP.LLP.
(31.1)*Certification of Michael P. Landy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(31.2)*Certification of Kevin S. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.1)*Certification of Michael P. Landy, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kevin S. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS++XBRLiXBRL Instance Document
101.SCH++XBRLiXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL++XBRLiXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
101.LAB++XBRLiXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE++XBRLiXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF++XBRLiXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

*Filed herewith.
+
+Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
++
++Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive date file is deemed not “filed” or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

9562
Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

TheTo the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (the “Company”) as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2018,2021, and the related notes and schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2)(i) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2018,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018,2021, based on criteria established inInternal Control–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated November 28, 2018,12, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Acquisition of Real Estate Properties

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, during fiscal 2021, the Company purchased four real estate properties for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $258.4 million. The Company determined that all four acquisitions are acquisitions of assets and that these property acquisitions do not meet the definition of a business. As a result, the total cash consideration for the four acquisitions were allocated to land, building and an intangible asset related to in-place leases on a relative fair value basis.

Auditing both (1) the determination that these acquisitions were asset acquisitions and (2) the relative fair value allocation of the cost of the property acquisitions to tangible and intangible assets involved a high degree of judgment, estimation and an increased extent of effort. The allocation of value to the components of properties acquired could have a material effect on the Company’s net income due to the differing depreciable and amortizable lives of each component and the classification of the related depreciation or amortization expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of income (loss).

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of management’s internal controls relating to acquisition accounting, including management’s review of third-party valuation reports, and their assessment of any intangible assets relating to in-place leases and above or below market leases. Among other audit procedures performed, (1) we evaluated the assets acquired to determine that they did not meet the definition of a business, and (2) we evaluated the appropriateness of the relative fair value allocation, including the key inputs and assumptions used by management. Our procedures included evaluating the reasonableness of the inputs and assumptions used by management and determining whether those inputs and assumptions were consistent with other evidence obtained in other areas of the audit and by considering the consistency with external market and industry data. Additionally, we recomputed the relative fair value allocation for each asset acquisition.

/s/ PKF O’Connor Davies, LLP

November 12, 2021

New York, New York

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.

November 28, 2018

New York, New York

* * *

9663
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017 
ASSETS        
Real Estate Investments:        
Land $224,719,083  $187,224,819 
Buildings and Improvements  1,494,859,336   1,244,691,715 
Total Real Estate Investments  1,719,578,419   1,431,916,534 
Accumulated Depreciation  (207,065,634)  (171,086,083)
Real Estate Investments  1,512,512,785   1,260,830,451 
         
Real Estate Held for Sale  -0-   14,631,633 
Cash and Cash Equivalents  9,324,585   10,226,046 
Securities Available for Sale at Fair Value  154,920,545   123,764,770 
Tenant and Other Receivables  1,249,434   1,753,054 
Deferred Rent Receivable  9,656,179   8,049,275 
Prepaid Expenses  6,189,796   5,434,874 
Intangible Assets, net of Accumulated Amortization of $13,699,519 and $13,404,318, respectively  14,589,756   10,010,165 
Capitalized Lease Costs, net of Accumulated Amortization of $3,271,481 and $3,393,187, respectively  5,231,845   4,180,907 
Financing Costs, net of Accumulated Amortization of $995,135 and $619,555, respectively  500,129   875,709 
Other Assets  4,202,832   3,280,871 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $1,718,377,886  $1,443,037,755 

(in thousands except per share amounts)

  2021  2020 
ASSETS        
         
Real Estate Investments:        
Land $277,846  $250,497 
Buildings and Improvements  2,025,844   1,793,367 
Total Real Estate Investments  2,303,690   2,043,864 
Accumulated Depreciation  (345,988)  (296,020)
Real Estate Investments  1,957,702   1,747,844 
         
Cash and Cash Equivalents  48,618   23,517 
Securities Available for Sale at Fair Value  143,505   108,832 
Tenant and Other Receivables  5,083   5,431 
Deferred Rent Receivable  15,679   12,856 
Prepaid Expenses  8,502   7,554 
Intangible Assets, net of Accumulated Amortization of $19,669 and $17,330, respectively  20,959   16,832 
Capitalized Lease Costs, net of Accumulated Amortization of $4,435 and $4,286, respectively  5,719   5,631 
Financing Costs, net of Accumulated Amortization of $745 and $356, respectively  991   1,380 
Other Assets  9,125   9,906 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $2,215,883  $1,939,783 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

9764
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONT’D)

AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Liabilities:        
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable, net of Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs $711,545,649  $591,364,371 
Loans Payable  186,608,676   120,091,417 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses  5,891,172   4,450,753 
Other Liabilities  16,426,622   14,265,518 
Total Liabilities  920,472,119   730,172,059 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
Shareholders’ Equity:        
6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 16,400,000 and 12,400,000 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively; 11,488,001 and 9,839,445 Shares Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively  287,200,025   245,986,125 
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 188,039,750 and 192,039,750 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively; 81,503,134 and 75,630,521 Shares Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively  815,031   756,305 
Excess Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 200,000,000 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2018 and 2017; No Shares Issued or Outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and 2017  -0-   -0- 
Additional Paid-In Capital  534,635,290   459,552,701 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  (24,744,579)  6,570,565 
Undistributed Income  -0-   -0- 
Total Shareholders’ Equity  797,905,767   712,865,696 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $1,718,377,886  $1,443,037,755 

(in thousands except per share amounts)

  2021  2020 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
         
Liabilities:        
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable, net of Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs $832,184  $799,507 
Loans Payable  250,000   75,000 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses  8,231   3,998 
Other Liabilities  30,734   23,673 
Total Liabilities  1,121,149   902,178 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
Shareholders’ Equity:        
6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 26,600 and 21,900 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively; 21,986 and 18,880 Shares Issued and Outstanding
As of September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively
  549,640   471,994 
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 300,000 and 200,000 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively; 98,333 and 98,054 Shares Issued and Outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and 2020,
respectively
  983   981 
Excess Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share: 200,000 Shares Authorized as of September 30, 2021 and 2020; NaN Shares Issued or Outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and 2020  0   0 
Additional Paid-In Capital  546,341   568,998 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss  (2,230)  (4,368)
Undistributed Income  0   0 
Total Shareholders’ Equity  1,094,734   1,037,605 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $2,215,883  $1,939,783 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

9865
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017  2016 
INCOME:            
Rental Revenue $115,864,119  $97,659,778  $81,592,429 
Reimbursement Revenue  23,297,730   18,725,527   16,163,004 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0- 
TOTAL INCOME  139,372,110   116,385,305   97,755,433 
             
EXPENSES:            
Real Estate Taxes  18,596,239   15,266,634   13,294,724 
Operating Expenses  5,793,878   4,887,922   4,273,899 
General and Administrative Expenses  8,776,579   7,809,546   7,936,124 
Acquisition Costs  -0-   178,526   730,441 
Depreciation  36,175,923   29,634,998   24,055,022 
Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and Intangible Assets  2,391,104   1,824,751   2,032,658 
TOTAL EXPENSES  71,733,723   59,602,377   52,322,868 
             
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):            
Dividend and Interest Income  13,120,465   6,930,564   5,616,392 
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  111,387   2,311,714   4,398,599 
Interest Expense, including Amortization of Financing Costs  (32,349,705)  (25,754,121)  (22,953,049)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)  (19,117,853)  (16,511,843)  (12,938,058)
             
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS  48,520,534   40,271,085   32,494,507 
             
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investments  7,485,266   -0-   -0- 
             
NET INCOME  56,005,800   40,271,085   32,494,507 
             
Less: Preferred Dividends  17,190,456   14,861,686   9,020,470 
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   2,467,165   2,942,149 
             

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888 

(in thousands)

  2021  2020  2019 
INCOME:            
             
Rental Revenue $155,044  $141,583  $132,524 
Reimbursement Revenue  27,712   26,234   22,297 
Lease Termination Income  377   0   0 
TOTAL INCOME  183,133   167,817   154,821 
             
EXPENSES:            
Real Estate Taxes  21,798   20,193   17,010 
Operating Expenses  6,984   6,919   6,464 
General and Administrative Expenses  9,353   8,932   9,081 
Non-recurring Strategic Alternatives & Proxy Costs  

35,920

   0   0 
Non-recurring Severance Expense  0   786   0 
Depreciation  51,478   46,670   43,020 
Amortization of Capitalized Lease Costs and Intangible Assets  3,586   3,180   2,870 
TOTAL EXPENSES  129,119   86,680   78,445 
             
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):            
Dividend Income  6,182   10,445   15,168 
Realized Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  6,376   0   0 
Realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  2,248   0   0 
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Periods  50,239   (77,380)  (24,680)
Interest Expense, including Amortization of Financing Costs  (37,880)  (36,376)  (36,912)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)  27,165   (103,311)  (46,424)
             
NET INCOME (LOSS)  81,179   (22,174)  29,952 
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest  2,996   (31)  152 
             
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS  78,183   (22,143)  29,800 
             
Less: Preferred Dividends  33,419   26,474   18,774 
             

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 $44,764  $(48,617) $11,026 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

9966
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017  2016 
BASIC INCOME – PER SHARE            
Net Income $0.71  $0.56  $0.50 
Less: Preferred Dividends  (0.22)  (0.21)  (0.14)
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   (0.03)  (0.05)
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders – Basic $0.49  $0.32  $0.31 
             
DILUTED INCOME – PER SHARE            
Net Income $0.71  $0.56  $0.50 
Less: Preferred Dividends  (0.22)  (0.21)  (0.14)
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   (0.03)  (0.05)
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders – Diluted $0.49  $0.32  $0.31 
             

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

            
Basic  78,619,440   72,114,078   65,468,564 
Diluted  78,802,208   72,249,691   65,558,284 
  2021  2020  2019 
BASIC INCOME – PER SHARE            
Net Income (Loss) $0.83  $(0.23) $0.32 
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest  (0.03)  0   0 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders $0.80  $(0.23) $0.32 
Less: Preferred Dividends  (0.34)  (0.27)  (0.20)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders – Basic $0.46  $(0.50) $0.12 
             
DILUTED INCOME – PER SHARE            
Net Income (Loss) $0.82  $(0.23) $0.32 
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest  (0.03)  0   0 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders $0.79  $(0.23) $0.32 
Less: Preferred Dividends  (0.34)  (0.27)  (0.20)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders – Diluted $0.45  $(0.50) $0.12 
             

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON

SHARES OUTSTANDING (in thousands)

            
Basic  98,253   98,082   93,387 
Diluted  98,443   98,164   93,485 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

10067
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017  2016 
          
Net Income $56,005,800  $40,271,085  $32,494,507 
Other Comprehensive Income:            
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Period  (31,203,757)  (4,059,988)  22,782,469 
Reclassification Adjustment for Net Gains Realized in Income  (111,387)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)
Total Comprehensive Income  24,690,656   33,899,383   50,878,377 
Less: Preferred Dividends  17,190,456   14,861,686   9,020,470 
Less: Redemption of Preferred Stock  -0-   2,467,165   2,942,149 

Comprehensive Income Attributable to Common Shareholders

 $7,500,200  $16,570,532  $38,915,758 

(in thousands)

  2021  2020  2019 
          
Net Income (Loss) $81,179  $(22,174) $29,952 
Other Comprehensive Income:            
Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap Agreement  2,138   (4,368)  0 
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)  83,317   (26,542)  29,952 
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest  (2,996)  31   (152)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders  80,321   (26,511)  29,800 
Less: Preferred Dividends  33,419   26,474   18,774 

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders

 $46,902  $(52,985) $11,026 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

10168
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, AND 20162019

  Common
Stock
  Preferred
Stock
Series A
  Preferred
Stock
Series B
  Preferred
Stock
Series C
  Additional
Paid in
Capital
 
Balance September 30, 2015 $621,235  $53,493,750  $57,500,000  $-0-  $339,837,258 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  65,157   -0-   -0-   -0-   72,110,640 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   135,000,000   (4,456,578)
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  -0-   (53,493,750)  -0-   -0-   2,930,649 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  2,450   -0-   -0-   -0-   1,880,850 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  400   -0-   -0-   -0-   (400)
Cancellation of Shares Related to Forfeiture of Restricted Stock Awards  (32)  -0-   -0-   -0-   32 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   926,465 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (21,502,295)
Net Income  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Preferred Dividends  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 

Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment

  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Balance September 30, 2016  689,210   -0-   57,500,000   135,000,000   391,726,621 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  66,327   -0-   -0-   -0-   91,865,504 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   75,000,000   (3,996,907)
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   35,986,125   (255,906)
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  -0-   -0-   (57,500,000)  -0-   2,467,165 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  650   -0-   -0-   -0-   468,650 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  110   -0-   -0-   -0-   (110)
Stock Compensation Expense  8   -0-   -0-   -0-   624,698 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (23,347,014)
Net Income  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Preferred Dividends  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 

Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment

  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Balance September 30, 2017  756,305   -0-   -0-   245,986,125   459,552,701 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  58,164   -0-   -0-   -0-   89,970,625 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   -0-   41,213,900   (1,120,250)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  400   -0-   -0-   -0-   569,200 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  125   -0-   -0-   -0-   (125)
Stock Compensation Expense  37   -0-   -0-   -0-   433,858 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- �� (14,770,719)
Net Income  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Preferred Dividends  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 

Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment

  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Balance September 30, 2018 $815,031  $-0-  $-0-  $287,200,025  $534,635,290 

(1)Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

(in thousands except per share amounts)

  Common
Stock
  Preferred
Stock Series C
  Additional
Paid in
Capital
 
Balance September 30, 2018 $815  $287,200  $534,635 
Impact of Adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-01  0   0   0 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  56   0   73,909 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of Common Stock, net of offering costs  92   0   132,246 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  0   60,478   (2,279)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  1   0   566 
Stock Compensation Expense  0   0   784 
Distributions To Common Shareholders ($0.68 per share)  0   0   (77,460)
Net Income Attributable to Shareholders  0   0   0 
Preferred Dividends ($1.53125 per share)  0   0   0 
Balance September 30, 2019  964   347,678   662,401 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  20   0   26,391 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  0   124,316   (1,934)
Shares Repurchased through the Common Stock
Repurchase Plan
  (4)  0   (4,272)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  1   0   1,015 
Stock Compensation Expense  0   0   452 
Distributions To Common Shareholders ($0.68 per share)  0   0   (115,055)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders  0   0   0 
Preferred Dividends ($1.53125 per share)  0   0   0 
Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap Agreement  0   0   0 
Balance September 30, 2020  981   471,994   568,998 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  1   0   1,360 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  0   77,646   (1,688)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  1   0   2,374 
Stock Compensation Expense  0   0   287 
Distributions To Common Shareholders ($0.71 per share)  0   0   (24,990)
Distributions To Common Shareholders  0   0   (24,990)
Net Income Attributable to Shareholders  0   0   0 
Preferred Dividends ($1.53125 per share)  0   0   0 
Preferred Dividends  0   0   0 
Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap Agreement  0   0   0 
Balance September 30, 2021 $983  $549,640  $546,341 

(1) Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

10269
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 AND 2016,2019, CONT’D.

  Undistributed
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 
Balance September 30, 2015 $-0-  $(5,441,603) $446,010,640 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  -0-   -0-   72,175,797 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   130,543,422 
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  (2,942,149)  -0-   (53,505,250)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  -0-   -0-   1,883,300 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Cancellation of Shares Related to Forfeiture of Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   926,465 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (20,531,888)  -0-   (42,034,183)
Net Income  32,494,507   -0-   32,494,507 
Preferred Dividends  (9,020,470)  -0-   (9,020,470)

Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment

  -0-   18,383,870   18,383,870 
Balance September 30, 2016  -0-   12,942,267   597,858,098 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  -0-   -0-   91,931,831 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   71,003,093 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   35,730,219 
Preferred Stock Called for Redemption  (2,467,165)  -0-   (57,500,000)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  -0-   -0-   469,300 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   624,706 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (22,942,234)  -0-   (46,289,248)
Net Income  40,271,085   -0-   40,271,085 
Preferred Dividends  (14,861,686)  -0-   (14,861,686)
Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   (6,371,702)  (6,371,702)
Balance September 30, 2017  -0-   6,570,565   712,865,696 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  -0-   -0-   90,028,789 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   -0-   40,093,650 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  -0-   -0-   569,600 
Shares Issued Through Restricted Stock Awards  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stock Compensation Expense  -0-   -0-   433,895 
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (38,815,344)  -0-   (53,586,063)
Net Income  56,005,800   -0-   56,005,800 
Preferred Dividends  (17,190,456)  -0-   (17,190,456)
Change in Unrealized Net Holding Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Reclassification Adjustment  -0-   (31,315,144)  (31,315,144)
Balance September 30, 2018 $-0-  $(24,744,579) $797,905,767 

(1)Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

(in thousands except per share amounts)

  Undistributed
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Total Shareholders’
Equity
 
Balance September 30, 2018 $0  $(24,744) $797,906 
Impact of Adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-01  (24,744)  24,744   0 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  0   0   73,965 
Shares Issued in Connection with Underwritten Public Offering of Common Stock, net of offering costs  0   0   132,338 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  0   0   58,199 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  0   0   567 
Stock Compensation Expense  0   0   784 
Distributions To Common Shareholders ($0.68 per share)  13,718   0   (63,742)
Net Income Attributable to Shareholders  29,800   0   29,800 
Preferred Dividends ($1.53125 per share)  (18,774)  0   (18,774)
Balance September 30, 2019  0   0   1,011,043 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  0   0   26,411 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  0   0   122,382 
Shares Repurchased through the Common Stock Repurchase Plan  0   0   (4,276)
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  0   0   1,016 
Stock Compensation Expense  0   0   452 
Distributions To Common Shareholders ($0.68 per share)  48,617   0   (66,438)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders  (22,143)  0   (22,143)
Preferred Dividends ($1.53125 per share)  (26,474)  0   (26,474)
Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap Agreement  0   (4,368)  (4,368)
Balance September 30, 2020  0   (4,368)  1,037,605 
Shares Issued in Connection with the DRIP (1)  0   0   1,361 
Shares Issued in Connection with At-The-Market Offerings of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  0   0   75,958 
Shares Issued Through the Exercise of Stock Options  0   0   2,375 
Stock Compensation Expense  0   0   287 
Distributions To Common Shareholders ($0.71 per share)  (44,764)  0   (69,754)
Distributions To Common Shareholders  (44,764)  0   (69,754)
Net Income Attributable to Shareholders  78,183   0   78,183 
Preferred Dividends ($1.53125 per share)  (33,419)  0   (33,419)
Preferred Dividends  (33,419)  0   (33,419)
Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap Agreement  0   2,138   2,138 
Balance September 30, 2021 $0  $(2,230) $1,094,734 

(1) Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

10370
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

  2018  2017  2016 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
Net Income $56,005,800  $40,271,085  $32,494,507 
Noncash Items Included in Net Income:            
Depreciation & Amortization  39,788,010   32,694,009   27,203,918 
Stock Compensation Expense  433,895   624,706   926,465 
Deferred Straight Line Rent  (1,972,588)  (1,027,927)  (1,709,821)
Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (111,387)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)
(Gain) Loss on Sale of Real Estate Investments  (7,485,266)  95,336   -0- 
Changes in:            
Tenant & Other Receivables  1,396,729   357,823   69,317 
Prepaid Expenses  (754,922)  (603,887)  (899,371)
Other Assets & Capitalized Lease Costs  (2,036,854)  15,353   (1,814,638)
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses & Other Liabilities  265,745   3,753,082   2,827,722 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES  85,529,162   73,867,866   54,699,500 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
Purchase of Real Estate & Intangible Assets  (283,402,845)  (286,951,980)  (210,747,340)
Capital Improvements  (9,084,163)  (4,974,988)  (21,566,561)
Proceeds from Sale of Real Estate Investments  22,083,340   4,125,819   -0- 
Return of Deposits on Real Estate  450,000   3,400,000   2,950,000 
Deposits Paid on Acquisitions of Real Estate  (200,000)  (450,000)  (2,200,000)
Proceeds from Sale of Securities Available for Sale  2,620,166   17,274,946   22,774,768 
Purchase of Securities Available for Sale  (64,979,698)  (71,494,810)  (19,055,956)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (332,513,200)  (339,071,013)  (227,845,089)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES            
Proceeds from Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable  175,160,000   188,809,000   153,428,485 
Principal Payments on Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable  (54,354,212)  (73,594,586)  (43,671,506)
Net Draws (Repayments) from Loans Payable  66,517,259   39,300,733   (4,250,702)
Financing Costs Paid on Debt  (1,469,914)  (2,190,098)  (2,646,393)
Redemption of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock  -0-   (53,493,750)  -0- 
Redemption of 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock  -0-   (57,500,000)  -0- 
Proceeds from Underwritten Public Offering of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs  -0-   71,003,093   130,543,422 
Proceeds from At-The-Market Preferred Equity Program, net of offering costs  40,093,650   35,733,885   -0- 
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock in the DRIP, net of Dividend Reinvestments  77,100,433   81,805,937   63,806,651 
Proceeds from the Exercise of Stock Options  569,600   469,300   1,883,300 
Preferred Dividends Paid  (16,876,532)  (14,500,474)  (8,607,032)
Common Dividends Paid, net of Reinvestments  (40,657,707)  (36,163,355)  (33,665,037)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  246,082,577   179,679,685   256,821,188 
             
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  (901,461)  (85,523,462)  83,675,599 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year  10,226,046   95,749,508   12,073,909 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $9,324,585  $10,226,046  $95,749,508 

(in thousands)

  2021  2020  2019 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
Net Income (Loss) $81,179  $(22,174) $29,952 
Noncash Items Included in Net Income (Loss):            
Depreciation & Amortization  56,448   51,263   47,142 
Stock Compensation Expense  287   452   784 
Deferred Straight Line Rent  (3,024)  (1,976)  (1,926)
Securities Available for Sale Received as Dividend Income  (1,012)  (1,213)  (874)
Unrealized Holding (Gains) Losses Arising During the Periods  (50,239)  77,380   24,680 
Realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions  (2,248)  0   0 
Realized Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  (6,376)  0   0 
Changes in:            
Tenant & Other Receivables  451   (3,993)  18 
Prepaid Expenses  (948)  (840)  (524)
Other Assets & Capitalized Lease Costs  (733)  (2,052)  729 
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses & Other Liabilities  11,023   2,014   767 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES  84,808   98,861   100,748 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
Purchase of Real Estate & Intangible Assets  (260,833)  (175,261)  (138,964)
Capital Improvements  (7,959)  (5,996)  (14,734)
Net Proceeds from Sale of Real Estate Investment  12,303   0   0 
Return of Deposits on Real Estate  5,360   2,000   200 
Deposits Paid on Acquisitions of Real Estate  (5,515)  (1,670)  (6,000)
Proceeds from the Sale of Securities Available for Sale  16,327   0   0 
Proceeds from Securities Available for Sale Called for Redemption  2,500   251   0 
Purchase of Securities Available for Sale  0   0   (54,136)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (237,817)  (180,676)  (213,634)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES            
Proceeds from Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable  104,000   110,310   96,500 
Principal Payments on Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable  (71,749)  (55,855)  (63,350)
Net Draws (Repayments) from Loans Payable  175,000   (20,000)  (91,609)
Financing Costs Paid on Debt  (567)  (2,525)  (662)
Proceeds from Underwritten Public Offering of Common Stock, net of offering costs  0   0   132,338 
Proceeds from At-The-Market Preferred Equity Program, net of offering costs  75,958   122,382   58,199 
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock in the DRIP, net of Dividend Reinvestments  320   18,815   57,079 
Net Distributions to Non-Controlling Interest  (5,491)  (32)  0 
Shares repurchased through the Common Stock Repurchase Plan  0   (4,276)  0 
Proceeds from the Exercise of Stock Options  2,375   1,016   567 
Preferred Dividends Paid  (33,023)  (25,839)  (18,465)
Common Dividends Paid, net of Reinvestments  (68,713)  (58,843)  (46,856)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  178,110   85,153   123,741 
             
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents  25,101   3,338   10,855 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year  23,517   20,179   9,324 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $48,618  $23,517  $20,179 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

10471
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of the Business

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, a Maryland corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (we, our, us, the Company or MREIC), operates as a real estate investment trust (REIT) deriving its income primarily from real estate rental operations. We were founded in 1968 and arehave been publicly owned since that time, making us one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world. As of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, rental properties consisted of 111122 and 108119 property holdings, respectively. These properties are located in 3032 states: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. As of September 30, 2018,2021, our weighted average lease maturity was approximately 8.17.0 years and our annualized average base rent per occupied square foot was $6.01.$6.61. Our weighted average lease expiration has been 7.0 years or greater for over seven consecutive years. Our overall occupancy rate has been 98.9% or above for over six consecutive years. As of September 30, 2018,2021, the weighted average building age, based on the square footage of our buildings, was 8.710.2 years. In addition, we own a

Our portfolio of REIT securities which we generally limitmodern, net-leased industrial properties continues to no more than approximately 10%provide shareholders with reliable and predictable income streams. Our resilient occupancy rates and rent collection results highlight the mission-critical nature of our undepreciated assets (whichand underscore the essential need for our tenants’ operations. Furthermore, because our weighted average lease term is 7.0 years and our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation)weighted average fixed rate mortgage debt maturity is 10.9 years, we expect our cash flow to remain resilient over long periods of time. Our overall occupancy rate has been over 99% throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic and is currently 99.7%. Our base rent collections remained strong, averaging 99.9% throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic and we expect future months to be consistent with this trend.

US industrial real estate market conditions are as strong as they have ever been with record high asking rents, a robust development pipeline, and an all-time high occupancy rate of 96%. Companies are leasing space at record levels to handle the large increase in ecommerce sales as well as the need for safety stock to counter supply chain disruptions. Construction costs are rising dramatically due to the long lead times for sourcing materials. The amount of new construction for US industrial real estate has been increasing for several years as more industrial space is needed to handle direct-to-consumer distribution. It is estimated that ecommerce sales require three times the amount of warehouse space relative to brick and mortar retail sales. These new buildings are often highly automated and have much larger truck courts and parking requirements. Because modern industrial buildings are built to handle both wholesale distribution as well as direct to consumer distribution, they are known as omni-channel facilities. The West coast ports are continuing to experience severe bottlenecks in processing imports and therefor, container traffic is being diverted towards the Gulf and East coast ports. The West coast ports are continuing to experience severe bottlenecks in processing imports and as a result much container traffic is being diverted towards the Gulf and East coast ports. Given our geographic footprint, this trend is a very favorable one for us.

As previously announced, on November 5, 2021, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Industrial Logistics Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“ILPT”), under which, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, ILPT will acquire us in an all-cash transaction, with our common stockholders receiving $21.00 in cash for each outstanding share of our common stock in connection with consummation of the transaction. ILPT’s acquisition of us is subject to obtaining the requisite approval of our common stockholders and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Upon closing of the merger with ILPT, holders of our outstanding 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”) will receive the amount of $25 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. We plan to continue to pay our regular quarterly common stock dividend and our Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock dividend for each full quarterly dividend period completed prior to the closing of the transaction. This transaction with ILPT represents the culmination of the publicly announced comprehensive strategic alternatives review processes conducted by our Board of Directors during 2021. Our Board re-initiated its strategic alternatives review process in September 2021 after a previous agreement for a merger that we entered into with another party, following a strategic alternatives review process earlier this year, did not receive the requisite approval of our stockholders.

72
Table of Contents

Use of Estimates

In preparing the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), we are required to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Segment Reporting & Financial Information

Our primary business is the ownership and management of real estate properties. We invest in well-located, modern, single tenant,single-tenant, industrial buildings leased primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries on long-term net leases. We review operating and financial information for each property on an individual basis and, therefore, each property represents an individual operating segment. We evaluate financial performance using Net Operating Income (NOI) from property operations. NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure, which we define as recurring Rental and Reimbursement Revenue, less Real Estate Taxes and Operating Expenses, such as insurance, utilities and repairs and maintenance. We have aggregated the properties into one reportable segment as the properties share similar long-term economic characteristics and have other similarities, including the fact that they are operated as industrial properties subject to long-term net leases primarily to investment-grade tenants or their subsidiaries.

Principles of Consolidation and Non-controlling Interest

The consolidated financial statements include the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. In 2005, we formed MREIC Financial, Inc., a taxable REIT subsidiary which has had no activity since inception. In 2007, we merged with Monmouth Capital Corporation (Monmouth Capital), with Monmouth Capital surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Non-controlling interests

For real estate investments that the Company consolidates but does not own 100% interest, any resulting non-controlling interest, if considered material, is presented as a component of shareholders equity on its Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the portion of earnings or loss attributable to non-controlling interest is presented separately in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). As a result of the sale of one of its majority owned real estate investments in fiscal 2021 (See Note 3), the Company has presented the non-controlling interest in its Statement of Income (Loss), however the presentation of non-controlling interest was considered immaterial to the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity.

Buildings and Improvements

Buildings and improvements are stated at the lower of depreciated cost or net realizable value. Depreciation is computed based on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. These lives are 39 years for buildings and range from 3 to 39 years for improvements.

105
Table of Contents

We apply Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360-10, Property, Plant & Equipment (ASC 360-10) to measure impairment in real estate investments. Rental properties are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected future cash flows (on an undiscounted basis without interest) from a rental property is less than its historical net cost basis. These expected future cash flows consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. Upon determination that an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, rental properties are reduced to their fair value. For properties to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the fair value of the property, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the property measured at the time there is a commitment to sell the property and/or it is actively being marketed for sale. A property to be disposed of is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value, less its cost to sell. Subsequent to the date that a property is held for disposition, depreciation expense is not recorded.

73
Table of Contents

Gains (Losses)Realized Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment

Gains (losses)Realized Gain on the saleSale of real estate investments areReal Estate Investment is recognized only when the profit (loss) on a given saleit is determinable, and the seller is not obliged to perform significant activities after the sale to earn such profit (loss).

Acquisitions

Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, upon acquisition of a property,determined that we allocated the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consisted of land, building and intangible assets, including above and below market leases and in-place leases. We allocated the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property generally determined by the third-party appraisal of the property obtained in conjunction with the purchase. The purchase price was further allocated to acquired above and below market leases based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place lease rates over the remaining term. In addition, any remaining amounts of the purchase price were applied to in-place lease values based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. In-place leases that may have a customer relationship intangible value, including (but not limited to) the nature and extent of the existing relationship with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals were also considered. Acquired above and below market leases were amortized to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The value of in-place lease intangibles was amortized to amortization expense over the remaining lease term. If a tenant terminated its lease early, the unamortized portion of the tenant improvements, leasing commissions, deferred rent, and the in-place lease value was charged to expense when there was a signed termination agreement,will collect substantially all of the conditionsconsideration to which we are entitled, possession and other attributes of ownership have been transferred to the termination agreementbuyer and we have no controlling financial interest. The application of these criteria can be complex and requires us to make assumptions. We have determined that all of these criteria were met for the tenant is no longer occupyingreal estate sold during the property and the termination consideration, if any, is probable of collection.periods presented.

As a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-01, effective April 1, 2017, we no longer account for our property acquisitions as business combinations and insteadAcquisitions

We account for our property acquisitions as acquisitions of assets. In an acquisition of assets, certain acquisition costs are capitalized to real estate investments as part of the purchase price as opposed to being expensed as Acquisition Costs under the previous accounting treatment for business combinations. Therefore, as of April 1, 2017, we are no longer required to expense our Acquisition Costs.price. In addition, acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business combination are accounted for as asset acquisitions whereby the consideration incurred is allocated to the individual assets acquired on a relative fair value basis.

Marketable Securities

Investments in securities available for sale primarily consist of marketable common and preferred stock securities of other REITs, which we generallyREITs. We limit the size of this portfolio to no more than approximately 10%5% of our undepreciated assets, (which is ourwhich we define as total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).depreciation. The value of the marketable securities was $143.5 million as of September 30, 2021, representing 5.6% of our undepreciated assets. We continue to believe that our REIT securities portfolio provides us with diversification, income, a source of potential liquidity when needed and also serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available in the private real estate markets. Our decision to reduce this threshold mainly stems from the implementation of accounting rule ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which took effect at the beginning of last fiscal year. This new rule requires that quarterly changes in the market value of our marketable securities flow through our Consolidated Statements of Income. The implementation of this accounting rule has resulted in increased volatility in our reported earnings and some of our key performance metrics. These marketable securities are all publicly-traded and purchased on the open market through private transactions or through dividend reinvestment plans. These securities may be classified among three categories: held-to-maturity, trading, and available-for-sale. We normally hold REIT securities on a long-term basis and have the ability and intent to hold securities to recovery. Therefore, as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, our securities are all classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value based upon quoted market prices in active markets. Gains or losses on the sale of securities are based on average cost and are accounted for on a trade date basis. Net unrealized holding gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized. The change in the unrealized net holding gains (losses) is reflected as Comprehensive Income (Loss).

106
Table of Contents

In January 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASUAccounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”.Liabilities.” ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. These changes became effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. The most significant change for us, once ASU 2016-01 was adopted, was the accounting treatment for our investments in marketable securities that are classified as available for sale.available-for-sale. The accounting treatment used for our Consolidated Financial Statements through Fiscalfiscal 2018 was that our investments in marketable securities, classified as available for sale, were carried at fair value, with net unrealized holding gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized and the change in net unrealized holding gains and losses being reflected as comprehensive income (loss). Under ASU 2016-01, effective October 1, 2018, these marketable securities continue to be measured at fair value, however, the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses are now recognized through net income. Subsequent to the fiscal yearend,income on our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). On October 1, 2018, unrealized net holding losses of $24,744,579 were reclassedwe recorded a $(24.7) million adjustment to beginning retained earnings to recognize the unrealized losses previously recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets.

We individually reviewUndistributed Income (Loss). In addition, $50.2 million, $(77.4) million and evaluate our marketable securities for impairment on a quarterly basis or when events or circumstances occur. We consider, among other things, credit aspects$(24.7) million of the issuer, amountnet unrealized holding gains (losses) have been reflected as Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Periods in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of decline in fair value over costIncome (Loss) for the fiscal years ended 2021, 2020 and length of time in a continuous loss position. We have developed a general policy of evaluating whether an unrealized loss is other than temporary. On a quarterly basis, we make an initial review of every individual security in our portfolio. If the security is impaired, we first determine our intent and ability to hold this investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Next, we determine the length of time and the extent of the impairment. Barring other factors, including the downgrading of the security or the cessation of dividends, if the fair value of the security is below cost by less than 20% for less than 6 months and we have the intent and ability to hold the security, the security is deemed to be temporarily impaired. Otherwise, we review additional information to determine whether the impairment is other than temporary. We discuss and analyze any relevant information known about the security, such as:2019, respectively.

a.Whether the decline is attributable to adverse conditions related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or in a geographic area.
b.Any downgrading of the security by a rating agency.
c.Whether the financial condition of the issuer has deteriorated.
d.Status of dividends – Whether dividends have been reduced or eliminated, or scheduled interest payments have not been made.
e.Analysis of the underlying assets (including NAV analysis) using independent analysis or recent transactions.74
Table of Contents

We normally hold REIT securities on a long-term basis and have the ability and intent to hold securities to recovery. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recognized in earnings and the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as the new cost basis.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and investments with an original maturity of three months or less. We maintain our cash in bank accounts in amounts that may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in these accounts in the past. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their current carrying amounts since all such items are short-term in nature.

107
Table of Contents

Intangible Assets, Capitalized Lease Costs and Financing Costs

Intangible assets, consisting primarily of the value of in-place leases, are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Upon termination of a lease, the unamortized portion is charged to expense. The weighted-averageweighted average amortization period upon acquisition for intangible assets recorded during 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 was 1217 years, 1314 years and 12 years, respectively.

Costs incurred in connection with the execution of leases are capitalized and amortized over the term of the respective leases. Unamortized lease costs are charged to expense upon cancellation of leases prior to the expiration of lease terms. Costs incurred in connection with obtaining mortgages and other financings and refinancingsre-financings are deferred and are amortized over the term of the related obligations using the effective interest method. Unamortized costs are charged to expense upon prepayment of the obligation. Amortization expense related to these deferred leasing and financing costs were $2,101,427, $2,089,259$2.7 million, $2.6 million and $2,072,120$2.2 million for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. We estimate that aggregate amortization expense for existing assets will be approximately $2,128,000, $1,802,000, $1,553,000, $1,435,000$2.5 million, $2.4 million, $1.8 million, $1.4 million and $1,356,000$1.4 million for the fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026, respectively.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to financial market risks, including interest rate risk on our variable rate debt. We attempt to limit these risks by following established risk management policies, procedures and strategies, including the use of derivative financial instruments. Our primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts is to minimize the variability that changes in interest rates could have on its future cash flows. We generally employ derivative instruments that effectively convert a portion of our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes. As further described in “Note 7 – Mortgage Notes and Loans Payable”, in November 2019 2020,we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of fixing the interest rate on our $75.0 million unsecured term loan (the “Term Loan”).

The interest rate for borrowings under the Term Loan will at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 130 basis points to 200 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 30 basis points to 100 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. The re-pricing and scheduled maturity dates, payment dates, index and the notional amounts of the interest rate swap agreement coincides with those of the underlying Term Loan. The interest rate swap agreement is net settled monthly. The Company has designated this derivative as a cash flow hedge and has recorded the fair value on the balance sheet in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (See Note 14 for information on the determination of fair value). The effective portion of the gain or loss on this hedge will be reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. To the extent that the hedging relationship is not effective or does not qualify as a cash flow hedge, the ineffective portion is recorded in interest expense. Hedges that received designated hedge accounting treatment are evaluated for effectiveness at the time that they are designated as well as through the hedging period. As of September 30, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively.we have determined that this interest rate swap agreement is highly effective as a cash flow hedge. As a result, the fair value of this derivative of $2.2 million as of September 30, 2021 was recorded as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, with the corresponding liability included in Other Liabilities.

75
Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

Rental revenue from tenants with leases having scheduled rental increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Tenant recoveries related to the reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as we are generally the primary obligor and, with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, have discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the associated credit risk. These occupancy charges are recognized as earned.

When applicable, we provide an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of tenant and other receivables and deferred rent receivables, which are estimated to be uncollectible. For accounts receivables that we deem uncollectible, we use the direct write-off method. We did not have an allowance for doubtful accounts balance as of September 30, 2018 and 2017 and there were no write-off’s of any receivable accounts during the fiscal years ended 2018 and 2017.

Lease Termination Income

Lease Termination Income is recognized in operating revenues when there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met, the tenant is no longer occupying the property and the termination consideration is probable of collection. Lease termination amounts are paid by tenants who want to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual term of the lease by agreement with us.

Effective October 1, 2020, we entered into a lease termination agreement with RGH Enterprises, Inc. (Cardinal Health) for our 75,000 square foot facility located in Halfmoon (Albany), NY, whereby we received a termination fee in the amount of $377,000 representing approximately 50% of the then remaining rent due under the lease, which was set to expire on November 30, 2021. We simultaneously entered into a 10.4 year lease agreement with United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) which became effective November 1, 2020. The lease agreement with UPS provides for five months of free rent, after which, on April 1, 2021, initial annual rent of $510,000, representing $6.80 per square foot, commenced, with 2.0% annual increases thereafter, resulting in a straight-line annualized rent of $541,000, representing $7.21 per square foot over the life of the lease, which expires March 31, 2031. This compares to the former U.S. GAAP straight-line rent of $574,000, representing $7.65 per square foot, and former cash rent of $8.19 per square foot, resulting in a decrease of $33,000, representing a 5.8% decrease on a U.S. GAAP straight-line basis and a decrease of 17.0% on a cash basis. The new 10.4 year lease agreement with UPS provides for an additional 9.3 years of lease term versus the old lease with Cardinal Health. In addition, effective June 4, 2021, we completed a parking lot expansion at this location for a cost of approximately $835,000 resulting in an initial increase in annual rent effective on the date of completion of approximately $52,000 from approximately $510,000, or $6.80 per square foot, to approximately $562,000, or $7.50 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will continue to increase each year by 2.0% resulting in an annualized rent from June 4, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of approximately $622,000, or $8.29 per square foot.

Only fourthree of our 111122 properties have leases that contain an early termination provision. These fourthree properties contain approximately 184,000177,000 total rentable square feet, representing less than 1% of our total rentable square feet. Our leases with early termination provisions are our 26,340 square foot location in Ridgeland (Jackson), MS, our 36,27036,000 square foot location in Urbandale (Des Moines), IA, our 38,83339,000 square foot location in Rockford, IL, and our 83,000102,000 square foot location in Roanoke, VA.O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO. Each lease termination provision contains certain requirements that must be met in order to exercise each termination provision. These requirements include: the date termination can be exercised, the time frame that notice must be given by the tenant to us and the termination fee that would be required to be paid by the tenant to us. The total potential termination fee tofees that would be paidpayable to us from the fourthree tenants with leases that have a termination provision amounts to approximately $1,694,000.$1.5 million.

108
Table of Contents

Net Income Per Share

Basic Net Income (Loss) per Common Share is calculated by dividing Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders by the weighted-averageweighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Common Share is calculated by dividing Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders by the weighted-averageweighted average number of common shares outstanding plusfor the weighted-average number ofperiod and, when dilutive, the potential net shares that would be issued upon exercise of stock options pursuant to the treasury stock method. In periods with a net loss, the basic loss per share equals the diluted loss per share as all common stock equivalents are excluded from the per share calculation because they are anti-dilutive.

In addition, common stock equivalents of 182,768, 135,613190,000, 82,000 and 89,72098,000 shares are included in the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for fiscal years 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. As of September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, options to purchase 65,000 65,000, 315,000 and -0-305,000 shares, respectively, were antidilutive.

76
Table of Contents

Stock Compensation Plan

We account for awards of stock, stock options and restricted stock in accordance with ASC 718-10, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”.Compensation.” ASC 718-10 requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and amortized over the service period (generally equal to the vesting period). The compensation cost for stock option grants is determined using option pricing models, intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date less estimated forfeitures. The compensation expense for restricted stock is recognized based on the fair value of the restricted stock awards less estimated forfeitures. The fair value of stock awards and restricted stock awards is equal to the fair value of our stock on the grant date. The amortization of compensation costs for the awards of stock, stock option grants and restricted stock are included in General and Administrative Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income and amounted to $433,895, $624,706$287,000, $452,000 and $926,465$784,000 have been recognized in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Included in Note 9 to these consolidated financial statements are the assumptions and methodology used to calculate the fair value of stock options and restricted shares.

Income Tax

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Code, and we intend to maintain our qualification as a REIT in the future. As a qualified REIT, with limited exceptions, we will not be taxed under Federal and certain state income tax laws at the corporate level on taxable income that we distribute to our shareholders. For special tax provisions applicable to REITs, refer to Sections 856-860 of the Code. We are subject to franchise taxes in several of the states in which we own properties.

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the TCJA), Code Section 199A, was added to the Code and became effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026. Under the TCJA, subject to certain income limitations, individual taxpayers and trusts and estates may deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of qualified REIT dividends they receive from their taxable income. Qualified REIT dividends do not include any portion of a dividend received from a REIT that is classified as a capital gain dividend or qualified dividend income.

We follow the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, that, among other things, defines a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Based on our evaluation, we determined that we have no uncertain tax positions and no unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2018.2021. We record interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as interest expense. As of September 30, 2018,2021, the fiscal tax years 20152018 through and including 20182021 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. There are currently no federal tax examinations in progress.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) attributable to shareholders and other comprehensive income.income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the change in the fair value of an interest rate swap derivative. Prior to our adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” on October 1, 2018, other comprehensive income consisted of unrealized holding gains or losses arising during the period on securities available for sale, less any reclassification adjustments for net gains of sales of securities transactions realized in income. Once we adopted ASU 2016-01, the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses were no longer recognized through other comprehensive income and instead these changes are now recognized through net income on our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

10977
Table of Contents

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements for the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation for the current year.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016,April 2020, FASB issued interpretive guidance relating to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, “Leases”. ASU 2016-02 amendsaccounting for lease concessions provided as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic that allows entities to treat the concession as if it was a part of the existing accounting standards forcontract instead of applying lease accounting, including requiring lesseesmodification accounting. This guidance is only applicable to recognize most leases on their balance sheetsthe COVID-19 Pandemic related lease concessions that do not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or the obligations of the lessee. We have elected this option relating to qualifying rent deferral and making targeted changesrent abatement agreements. For qualifying lease modifications with rent deferrals, this results in no change to lessor accounting. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 will become effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The most significant changes related to lessor accounting under ASU 2016-02 include bifurcating revenue into lease and non-lease components and the new standard’s narrow definition of initial direct costs for leases. Since our revenue is primarily derived from leasing activities from long-term net leases and since we currently do not capitalize indirect costs for leases, we believe that will continue to account for our leases and related leasing costs in substantially the same manner as we currently do once the adoption of the ASU 2016-02 becomes effective.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases”. The amendment in ASU 2018-10 affects narrow aspects of the guidance issued earlier in ASU 2016-02 by removing certain inconsistencies and providing additional clarification related to the guidance issued earlier. ASU 2018-10 is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. These changes became effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018. The most significant change for us, once ASU 2016-01 was adopted, was the accounting treatment for our investments in marketable securities that are classified as available for sale. The accounting treatment used for our Consolidated Financial Statements through Fiscal 2018, was that our investments in marketable securities, classified as available for sale, were carried at fair value, with net unrealized holding gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of Shareholders’ Equity until realized and the change in net unrealized holding gains and losses being reflected as comprehensive income (loss). Under ASU 2016-01, effective October 1, 2018, these marketable securities continue to be measured at fair value, however the changes in net unrealized holding gains and losses are now recognized through net income. Subsequent to the fiscal yearend, on October 1, 2018, unrealized net holding losses of $24,744,579 were reclassed to beginning retained earnings to recognize the unrealized losses previously recorded in “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requiresrecognition but an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers”. The FASB issued further guidance in ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”, that provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and adds some practical expedients. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The effective date of ASU 2014-09 was extended by one year by ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date”. The new standard is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Therefore, we adopted the standard effective October 1, 2018. Our revenue is primarily derived from leasing activities and historically our property dispositions have been cash sales with no contingencies and no future involvementincrease in the property. Sincelease receivable balance until the deferred rent has been repaid. For qualifying lease modifications that include rent abatement concessions, this standard applies to all contracts with customers except those that are withinresults in a direct reduction of rental income in the scope of other guidance, such as leases, the adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.current period.

110
Table of Contents

We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 2 – REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

The following is a summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of our land, buildings and improvements at September 30, 20182021 and 2017:2020 (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

 Property    Buildings & Accumulated Net Book  Property     Buildings & Accumulated Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
           
SEPTEMBER 30, 2021  Type Land Improvements Depreciation Value 
Alabama:                                      
Huntsville Industrial $748,115  $5,913,696  $1,249,093  $5,412,718   Industrial  $748  $5,914  $1,714  $4,948 
Mobile Industrial  2,480,474   30,571,842   195,973   32,856,343   Industrial   2,480   30,572   2,548   30,504 
Arizona:                                      
Tolleson (Phoenix) Industrial  1,316,075   15,508,151   6,144,623   10,679,603   Industrial   1,316   15,508   7,674   9,150 
Colorado:                                      
Colorado Springs Industrial  2,150,000   27,170,066   1,593,580   27,726,486   Industrial   2,150   27,170   3,744   25,576 
Denver Industrial  1,150,000   5,204,051   1,704,122   4,649,929   Industrial   1,150   5,224   2,108   4,266 
Connecticut:                                      
Newington (Hartford) Industrial  410,000   3,084,108   1,377,254   2,116,854   Industrial   410   3,116   1,635   1,891 
Florida:                                      
Cocoa Industrial  1,881,316   12,246,133   2,758,147   11,369,302   Industrial   1,881   12,246   3,725   10,402 
Davenport (Orlando) Industrial  7,060,000   30,720,000   1,706,667   36,073,333   Industrial   7,060   31,027   4,094   33,993 
Daytona Beach Industrial  3,119,640   26,853,559   344,276   29,628,923   Industrial   3,120   27,754   2,454   28,420 
Ft. Myers (FDX Ground) Industrial  2,486,417   19,177,218   842,928   20,820,707 
Ft. Myers  Industrial   2,486   19,198   2,312   19,372 
Homestead (Miami) Industrial  4,426,727   33,446,393   1,072,000   36,801,120   Industrial   4,427   33,485   3,656   34,256 
Jacksonville (FDX) Industrial  1,165,000   5,231,958   2,619,003   3,777,955   Industrial   1,165   5,419   3,159   3,425 
Jacksonville (FDX Ground) Industrial  6,000,000   24,735,702   2,323,375   28,412,327   Industrial   6,000   24,926   4,305   26,621 
Lakeland Industrial  261,000   1,782,226   573,621   1,469,605   Industrial   261   1,782   724   1,319 
Orlando Industrial  2,200,000   6,574,524   1,830,818   6,943,706   Industrial   2,200   6,610   2,405   6,405 
Punta Gorda Industrial  -0-   4,133,510   1,058,498   3,075,012   Industrial   0   4,134   1,398   2,736 
Tampa (FDX Ground) Industrial  5,000,000   14,701,575   4,921,899   14,779,676   Industrial   5,000   14,745   6,059   13,686 
Tampa (FDX) Industrial  2,830,000   5,027,120   1,515,388   6,341,732   Industrial   2,830   5,518   2,004   6,344 
Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) Industrial  1,867,000   3,810,982   1,144,249   4,533,733   Industrial   1,867   3,811   1,448   4,230 
Georgia:                                      
Augusta (FDX Ground) Industrial  614,406   4,748,899   1,509,465   3,853,840   Industrial   614   4,749   1,878   3,485 
Augusta (FDX) Industrial  380,000   1,597,779   463,245   1,514,534   Industrial   380   1,613   602   1,391 
Braselton (Atlanta) Industrial  13,964,652   46,262,482   98,855   60,128,279   Industrial   13,965   46,273   3,659   56,579 
Griffin (Atlanta) Industrial  760,000   14,173,683   4,493,178   10,440,505   Industrial   760   14,322   5,716   9,366 
Savannah Industrial  4,404,988   51,620,957   882,410   55,143,535 
Illinois:                  
Burr Ridge (Chicago) Industrial  270,000   1,422,901   741,290   951,611 
Elgin (Chicago) Industrial  1,280,000   5,697,442   2,436,368   4,541,074 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  340,000   12,357,848   5,183,974   7,513,874 
Montgomery (Chicago) Industrial  2,000,000   9,303,317   2,761,952   8,541,365 
Rockford (Collins Aerospace) Industrial  480,000   4,620,000   473,846   4,626,154 
Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Co.) Industrial  1,100,000   4,451,227   859,960   4,691,267 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  1,890,000   13,314,950   1,366,159   13,838,791 
Schaumburg (Chicago) Industrial  1,039,800   4,138,140   2,283,345   2,894,595 
Wheeling (Chicago) Industrial  5,112,120   13,870,354   4,430,770   14,551,704 
Indiana:                  
Greenwood (Indianapolis) Industrial  2,250,000   35,262,071   3,091,837   34,420,234 
Indianapolis Industrial  3,745,572   21,758,510   2,239,839   23,264,243 
Locust Grove (Atlanta)  Industrial   9,667   83,569   1,607   91,629 

11178
Table of Contents

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Iowa:                  
Urbandale (Des Moines) Industrial $310,000  $2,213,644  $1,211,364  $1,312,280 
Kansas:                  
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlisle Tire) Industrial  1,185,000   6,047,986   2,538,608   4,694,378 
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) Industrial  2,750,000   15,544,108   2,001,778   16,292,330 
Olathe (Kansas City) Industrial  2,350,000   29,387,000   1,632,611   30,104,389 
Topeka Industrial  -0-   3,679,843   896,483   2,783,360 
Kentucky:                  
Buckner (Louisville) Industrial  2,280,000   24,527,852   3,114,323   23,693,529 
Frankfort (Lexington) Industrial  1,850,000   26,150,000   2,570,299   25,429,701 
Louisville Industrial  1,590,000   9,714,000   581,179   10,722,821 
Louisiana:                  
Covington (New Orleans) Industrial  2,720,000   15,690,000   1,139,872   17,270,128 
Maryland:                  
Beltsville (Washington, DC) Industrial  3,200,000   11,312,355   4,151,339   10,361,016 
Michigan:                  
Walker (Grand Rapids) Industrial  4,034,363   27,620,623   1,062,332   30,592,654 
Livonia (Detroit) Industrial  320,000   13,442,030   2,046,869   11,715,161 
Orion Industrial  4,649,971   18,240,153   4,488,942   18,401,182 
Romulus (Detroit) Industrial  531,000   4,201,671   2,043,189   2,689,482 
Minnesota:                  
Stewartville (Rochester) Industrial  900,000   4,320,000   553,846   4,666,154 
Mississippi:                  
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) Industrial  800,000   13,750,000   2,203,526   12,346,474 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool) Industrial  2,550,000   34,364,917   4,044,199   32,870,718 
Richland (Jackson) Industrial  211,000   1,689,691   982,066   918,625 
Ridgeland (Jackson) Industrial  218,000   1,667,254   1,313,173   572,081 
Missouri:                  
Kansas City (Bunzl) Industrial  1,000,000   8,980,250   885,643   9,094,607 
Liberty (Kansas City) Industrial  723,000   6,674,881   3,497,982   3,899,899 
O’Fallon (St. Louis) Industrial  264,000   3,981,913   2,361,768   1,884,145 
St. Joseph Industrial  800,000   12,563,648   5,452,138   7,911,510 
Nebraska:                  
Omaha Industrial  1,170,000   4,774,691   2,358,451   3,586,240 
New Jersey:                  
Carlstadt (New York, NY) Industrial  1,194,000   3,748,402   1,029,584   3,912,818 
Somerset Shopping Center  34,317   3,077,460   1,589,653   1,522,124 
New York:                  
Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Industrial  4,796,765   6,164,058   1,851,798   9,109,025 
Halfmoon (Albany) Industrial  1,190,000   4,335,600   722,600   4,803,000 
Hamburg (Buffalo) Industrial  1,700,000   33,150,000   1,700,000   33,150,000 
North Carolina:                  
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,305,000   28,739,797   2,314,361   30,730,436 
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,306,684   35,736,461   1,069,039   38,974,106 
Fayetteville Industrial  172,000   5,279,629   2,931,202   2,520,427 
Winston-Salem Industrial  980,000   6,266,326   2,617,877   4,628,449 
Ohio:                  
Bedford Heights (Cleveland) Industrial  990,000   5,929,836   1,893,515   5,026,321 
Cincinnati Industrial  800,000   5,950,000   470,406   6,279,594 
Kenton Industrial  854,780   17,026,827   454,776   17,426,831 
Lebanon (Cincinnati) Industrial  240,000   4,212,425   704,125   3,748,300 
Monroe (Cincinnati) Industrial  1,800,000   15,724,760   1,023,271   16,501,489 
Richfield (Cleveland) Industrial  2,676,848   13,770,330   3,083,114   13,364,064 

 Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
Savannah (Shaw) Industrial $4,405  $51,621  $4,853  $51,173 
Savannah (FDX Ground) Industrial  3,441   24,091   1,750   25,782 
Illinois:                  
Burr Ridge (Chicago) Industrial  270   1,615   869   1,016 
Elgin (Chicago) Industrial  1,280   5,902   2,984   4,198 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  340   12,418   6,252   6,506 
Montgomery (Chicago) Industrial  2,000   9,303   3,484   7,819 
Rockford (Collins Aerospace Systems) Industrial  480   4,620   829   4,271 
Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Co.) Industrial  1,100   4,451   1,206   4,345 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  1,890   15,519   2,391   15,018 
Schaumburg (Chicago) Industrial  1,040   4,407   2,671   2,776 
Wheeling (Chicago) Industrial  5,112   14,513   5,600   14,025 
Indiana:                  
Greenwood (Indianapolis) (ULTA) Industrial  2,250   35,524   5,828   31,946 
Greenwood (Indianapolis) (Amazon) Industrial  4,839   74,525   3,822   75,542 
Indianapolis (FDX Ground) Industrial  3,746   21,758   4,009   21,495 
Lafayette Industrial  2,802   22,277   1,238   23,841 
Iowa:                  
Urbandale (Des Moines) Industrial  310   2,234   1,459   1,085 
Kansas:                  
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlstar Group) Industrial  1,185   6,098   3,014   4,269 
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) Industrial  2,750   15,544   3,245   15,049 
Olathe (Kansas City) Industrial  3,616   31,831   3,960   31,487 
Topeka Industrial  0   3,680   1,179   2,501 
Kentucky:                  
Buckner (Louisville) Industrial  2,280   24,528   5,039   21,769 
Frankfort (Lexington) Industrial  1,850   26,150   4,582   23,418 
Louisville Industrial  1,590   9,714   1,328   9,976 
Louisiana:                  
Covington (New Orleans) Industrial  2,720   15,706   2,352   16,074 
Maryland:                  
Beltsville (Washington, DC) Industrial  3,200   11,521   5,045   9,676 
Michigan:                  
Walker (Grand Rapids) Industrial  4,034   27,621   3,187   28,468 
Livonia (Detroit) Industrial  320   13,568   3,127   10,761 
Orion Industrial  4,650   18,506   5,902   17,254 
Romulus (Detroit) Industrial  531   4,418   2,477   2,472 
Minnesota:                  
Stewartville (Rochester) Industrial  900   4,332   888   4,344 
Mississippi:                  
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) Industrial  800   13,750   3,261   11,289 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool) Industrial  2,550   34,365   6,697   30,218 
Richland (Jackson) Industrial  211   1,690   1,200   701 
Ridgeland (Jackson) Industrial  218   2,738   1,585   1,371 
Missouri:                  
Kansas City Industrial  1,000   9,003   1,670   8,333 
Liberty (Kansas City) Industrial  724   7,075   4,128   3,671 
O’Fallon (St. Louis) Industrial  264   3,986   2,735   1,515 
St. Joseph Industrial  800   12,705   6,518   6,987 
Nebraska:                  
Omaha Industrial  1,170   4,794   2,734   3,230 
New Jersey:                  
Somerset Shopping Center  35   3,104   1,873   1,266 
Trenton Industrial  8,336   75,652   5,819   78,169 

11279
Table of Contents

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Stow Industrial $1,429,715  $17,504,350  $448,829  $18,485,236 
Streetsboro (Cleveland) Industrial  1,760,000   17,840,000   2,973,333   16,626,667 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) Industrial  695,000   5,038,686   2,305,181   3,428,505 
Oklahoma:                  
Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,410,000   11,174,462   1,599,042   10,985,420 
Oklahoma City (Bunzl) Industrial  844,688   7,883,751   252,684   8,475,755 
Oklahoma City (Amazon) Industrial  1,618,240   28,260,702   603,861   29,275,081 
Tulsa Industrial  790,000   2,958,031   391,119   3,356,912 
Pennsylvania:                  
Altoona Industrial  1,200,000   7,822,966   986,269   8,036,697 
Imperial (Pittsburgh) Industrial  3,700,000   16,250,000   1,076,389   18,873,611 
Monaca (Pittsburgh) Industrial  401,716   7,508,950   2,957,471   4,953,195 
South Carolina:                  
Aiken (Augusta, GA) Industrial 1,362,458  19,677,937  630,703  20,409,692 
Charleston (FDX) Industrial  4,639,283   16,880,128   397,072   21,122,339 
Charleston (FDX Ground) Industrial  7,103,106   39,473,274   168,689   46,407,691 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) Industrial  1,746,822   15,327,214   2,654,658   14,419,378 
Hanahan (Charleston)(SAIC) Industrial  1,129,000   12,281,102   4,343,346   9,066,756 
Hanahan (Charleston)(FDX Ground) Industrial  930,000   6,684,653   2,071,138   5,543,515 
Tennessee:                  
Chattanooga Industrial  300,000   4,838,540   1,388,863   3,749,677 
Lebanon (Nashville) Industrial  2,230,000   11,985,126   2,151,164   12,063,962 
Memphis Industrial  1,234,987   13,380,000   2,916,162   11,698,825 
Shelby County Vacant Land  11,065   -0-   -0-   11,065 
Texas:                  
Carrollton (Dallas) Industrial  1,500,000   16,319,203   3,555,283   14,263,920 
Corpus Christi Industrial  -0-   4,808,330   797,350   4,010,980 
Edinburg Industrial  1,000,000   11,039,014   1,472,631   10,566,383 
El Paso Industrial  3,225,195   9,205,997   1,977,282   10,453,910 
Ft. Worth (Dallas) Industrial  8,200,000   27,100,832   2,200,495   33,100,337 
Houston Industrial  1,661,120   6,502,158   1,440,389   6,722,889 
Lindale (Tyler) Industrial  540,000   9,425,550   966,498   8,999,052 
Mesquite (Dallas) Industrial  6,247,658   43,632,835   1,398,488   48,482,005 
Spring (Houston) Industrial  1,890,000   17,404,396   2,077,166   17,217,230 
Waco Industrial  1,350,000   11,201,368   1,498,728   11,052,640 
Virginia:                  
Charlottesville Industrial  1,170,000   3,285,702   1,588,202   2,867,500 
Mechanicsville (Richmond) Industrial  1,160,000   6,632,395   3,007,443   4,784,952 
Richmond Industrial  446,000   4,322,309   1,545,670   3,222,639 
Roanoke (CHEP USA) Industrial  1,853,000   5,610,672   1,706,454   5,757,218 
Roanoke (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,740,000   8,460,000   1,147,885   9,052,115 
Washington:                  
Burlington (Seattle/Everett) Industrial  8,000,000   22,228,547   1,426,792   28,801,755 
Wisconsin:                  
Cudahy (Milwaukee) Industrial  980,000   8,786,361   3,296,930   6,469,431 
Green Bay Industrial  590,000   5,980,000   766,667   5,803,333 
Total as of September 30, 2018   $224,719,083  $1,494,859,336  $207,065,634  $1,512,512,785 

 Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
New York:                  
Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Industrial $4,797  $6,164  $2,330  $8,631 
Halfmoon (Albany) Industrial  1,190   5,551   1,134   5,607 
Hamburg (Buffalo) Industrial  1,700   33,440   4,313   30,827 
North Carolina:                  
Concord I (Charlotte) Industrial  4,305   28,749   4,847   28,207 
Concord II (Charlotte) Industrial  4,307   35,736   3,818   36,225 
Fayetteville Industrial  172   5,286   3,532   1,926 
Whitsett (Greensboro) Industrial  2,735   43,976   1,503   45,208 
Winston-Salem Industrial  980   6,447   3,239   4,188 
Ohio:                  
Bedford Heights (Cleveland) Industrial  990   6,314   2,530   4,774 
Cincinnati Industrial  800   5,950   928   5,822 
Lancaster (Columbus) Industrial  959   16,599   638   16,920 
Kenton Industrial  855   17,876   1,970   16,761 
Lebanon (Cincinnati) Industrial  240   4,315   1,069   3,486 
Monroe (Cincinnati) Industrial  1,800   19,777   2,452   19,125 
Plain City (Columbus) Industrial  6,554   65,187   1,254   70,487 
Richfield (Cleveland) Industrial  2,677   13,960   4,156   12,481 
Stow Industrial  1,430   17,504   1,795   17,139 
Streetsboro (Cleveland) Industrial  1,760   17,840   4,346   15,254 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) Industrial  695   5,039   2,842   2,892 
Oklahoma:                  
Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,410   11,215   2,479   10,146 
Oklahoma City (Bunzl) Industrial  845   7,883   859   7,869 
Oklahoma City (Amazon) Industrial  1,618   28,260   2,778   27,100 
Oklahoma City (Amazon II) Industrial  1,378   13,584   363   14,599 
Tulsa Industrial  790   2,958   631   3,117 
Pennsylvania:                  
Altoona Industrial  1,200   7,823   1,595   7,428 
Imperial (Pittsburgh) Industrial  3,700   16,290   2,331   17,659 
Monaca (Pittsburgh) Industrial  402   7,562   3,730   4,234 
South Carolina:                  
Aiken (Augusta, GA) Industrial  1,362   19,678   2,144   18,896 
Charleston (FDX) Industrial  4,639   16,900   1,703   19,836 
Charleston (FDX Ground) Industrial  7,103   39,473   3,205   43,371 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) Industrial  1,747   15,317   3,826   13,238 
Hanahan (Charleston) (SAIC) Industrial  1,129   13,334   5,791   8,672 
Hanahan (Charleston) (Amazon) Industrial  930   8,376   2,852   6,454 
Tennessee:                  
Chattanooga Industrial  300   5,069   1,827   3,542 
Kodak (Knoxville) Industrial  2,918   30,972   66   33,824 
Lebanon (Nashville) Industrial  2,230   11,985   3,073   11,142 
Memphis Industrial  1,235   14,858   4,278   11,815 
Shelby County Vacant Land  11   0   0   11 
Texas:                  
Carrollton (Dallas) Industrial  1,500   16,997   4,908   13,589 
Corpus Christi Industrial  0   4,808   1,176   3,632 
Edinburg Industrial  1,000   11,039   2,324   9,715 
El Paso Industrial  3,225   9,206   2,780   9,651 
Ft. Worth (Dallas) Industrial  8,200   27,448   4,358   31,290 
Houston Industrial  1,661   6,560   2,019   6,202 
Lindale (Tyler) Industrial  948   11,355   1,699   10,604 
Mesquite (Dallas) Industrial  6,248   43,632   4,755   45,125 
Spring (Houston) Industrial  1,890   17,439   3,432   15,897 
Waco Industrial  1,350   11,201   2,363   10,188 
Utah:                  
Ogden (Salt Lake City) Industrial  1,287   11,380   389   12,278 

11380
Table of Contents

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Alabama:                  
Huntsville Industrial $748,115  $5,913,696  $1,092,730  $5,569,081 
Arizona:                  
Tolleson (Phoenix) Industrial  1,316,075   15,508,151   5,634,312   11,189,914 
Colorado:                  
Colorado Springs (1) Industrial  1,270,000   5,934,472   1,644,190   5,560,282 
Colorado Springs Industrial  2,150,000   26,350,000   900,855   27,599,145 
Denver Industrial  1,150,000   5,204,051   1,570,819   4,783,232 
Connecticut:                  
Newington (Hartford) Industrial  410,000   3,084,108   1,288,391   2,205,717 
Florida:                  
Cocoa Industrial  1,881,316   12,246,133   2,435,695   11,691,754 
Davenport (Orlando) Industrial  7,060,000   30,720,000   918,974   36,861,026 
Ft. Myers (Vacant) (1) Industrial  1,910,000   3,107,448   1,057,915   3,959,533 
Ft. Myers (FDX Ground) Industrial  2,400,000   19,223,000   353,846   21,269,154 
Homestead (Miami) Industrial  4,426,727   33,446,393   214,400   37,658,720 
Jacksonville (FDX) Industrial  1,165,000   5,164,784   2,450,615   3,879,169 
Jacksonville (FDX Ground) Industrial  6,000,000   24,732,090   1,688,236   29,043,854 
Lakeland Industrial  261,000   1,721,532   525,151   1,457,381 
Orlando Industrial  2,200,000   6,354,432   1,636,085   6,918,347 
Punta Gorda Industrial  -0-   4,133,510   945,236   3,188,274 
Tampa (FDX Ground) Industrial  5,000,000   14,696,227   4,544,868   15,151,359 
Tampa (FDX) Industrial  2,830,000   4,789,924   1,383,938   6,235,986 
Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) Industrial  1,867,000   3,810,982   1,043,048   4,634,934 
Georgia:                  
Augusta (FDX Ground) Industrial  614,406   4,748,899   1,385,556   3,977,749 
Augusta (FDX) Industrial  380,000   1,597,779   415,251   1,562,528 
Griffin (Atlanta) Industrial  760,000   14,108,857   4,128,872   10,739,985 
Illinois:                  
Burr Ridge (Chicago) Industrial  270,000   1,422,901   698,725   994,176 
Elgin (Chicago) Industrial  1,280,000   5,697,442   2,284,344   4,693,098 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  340,000   12,357,848   4,834,280   7,863,568 
Montgomery (Chicago) Industrial  2,000,000   9,298,367   2,522,213   8,776,154 
Rockford (Collins Aerospace Systems) Industrial  480,000   4,620,000   355,385   4,744,615 
Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Co.) Industrial  1,100,000   4,451,227   744,286   4,806,941 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  1,890,000   13,314,950   1,024,382   14,180,568 
Schaumburg (Chicago) Industrial  1,039,800   4,138,140   2,159,563   3,018,377 
Wheeling (Chicago) Industrial  5,112,120   13,425,532   4,079,587   14,458,065 
Indiana:                  
Greenwood (Indianapolis) Industrial  2,250,000   35,262,071   2,186,221   35,325,850 
Indianapolis Industrial  3,739,030   21,267,342   1,657,124   23,349,248 
Iowa:                  
Urbandale (Des Moines) Industrial  310,000   1,946,613   1,144,794   1,111,819 
Kansas:                  
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlisle Tire) Industrial  1,185,000   6,047,986   2,358,818   4,874,168 
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) Industrial  2,750,000   15,544,108   1,587,164   16,706,944 
Olathe (Kansas City) Industrial  2,350,000   29,387,000   879,098   30,857,902 
Topeka Industrial  -0-   3,679,843   802,124   2,877,719 
Kentucky:                  
Buckner (Louisville) Industrial  2,280,000   24,527,852   2,472,411   24,335,441 
Frankfort (Lexington) Industrial  1,850,000   26,150,000   1,899,786   26,100,214 
Louisville Industrial  1,590,000   9,714,000   332,103   10,971,897 
Louisiana:                  
Covington (New Orleans) Industrial  2,720,000   15,690,000   737,564   17,672,436 

 Property      Buildings &   Accumulated   Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 (cont’d) Type  Land   Improvements   Depreciation   Value 
Vermont:                  
Burlington Industrial $7,729  $46,096  $197  $53,628 
Virginia:                  
Charlottesville Industrial  1,170   3,292   1,905   2,557 
Mechanicsville (Richmond) Industrial  1,160   6,676   3,560   4,276 
Richmond Industrial  446   4,651   1,937   3,160 
Roanoke (CHEP USA) Industrial  1,853   5,619   2,286   5,186 
Roanoke (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,740   8,460   1,799   8,401 
Washington:                  
Burlington (Seattle/Everett) Industrial  8,000   22,371   3,154   27,217 
Wisconsin:                  
Cudahy (Milwaukee) Industrial  980   8,835   4,075   5,740 
Green Bay Industrial  590   5,990   1,227   5,353 
Total as of September 30, 2021   $277,846  $2,025,844  $345,988  $1,957,702 

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
Alabama:                  
Huntsville Industrial $748  $5,914  $1,562  $5,100 
Mobile Industrial  2,480   30,572   1,763   31,289 
Arizona:                  
Tolleson (Phoenix) Industrial  1,316   15,508   7,167   9,657 
Colorado:                  
Colorado Springs Industrial  2,150   27,170   3,027   26,293 
Denver Industrial  1,150   5,224   1,973   4,401 
Connecticut:                  
Newington (Hartford) Industrial  410   3,097   1,553   1,954 
Florida:                  
Cocoa Industrial  1,881   12,246   3,403   10,724 
Davenport (Orlando) Industrial  7,060   31,025   3,286   34,799 
Daytona Beach Industrial  3,120   27,161   1,730   28,551 
Ft. Myers Industrial  2,486   19,198   1,821   19,863 
Homestead (Miami) Industrial  4,427   33,485   2,795   35,117 
Jacksonville (FDX) Industrial  1,165   5,419   2,979   3,605 
Jacksonville (FDX Ground) Industrial  6,000   24,926   3,633   27,293 
Lakeland Industrial  261   1,782   676   1,367 
Orlando Industrial  2,200   6,610   2,212   6,598 
Punta Gorda Industrial  0   4,134   1,286   2,848 
Tampa (FDX Ground) Industrial  5,000   14,745   5,680   14,065 
Tampa (FDX) Industrial  2,830   5,071   1,824   6,077 
Tampa (Tampa Bay Grand Prix) Industrial  1,867   3,811   1,347   4,331 
Georgia:                  
Augusta (FDX Ground) Industrial  614   4,749   1,756   3,607 
Augusta (FDX) Industrial  380   1,604   558   1,426 
Braselton (Atlanta) Industrial  13,965   46,262   2,471   57,756 
Griffin (Atlanta) Industrial  760   14,322   5,338   9,744 
Savannah (Shaw) Industrial  4,405   51,621   3,530   52,496 
Savannah (FDX Ground) Industrial  3,441   24,091   1,133   26,399 
Illinois:                  
Burr Ridge (Chicago) Industrial  270   1,437   822   885 
Elgin (Chicago) Industrial  1,280   5,902   2,791   4,391 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  340   12,358   5,895   6,803 
Montgomery (Chicago) Industrial  2,000   9,303   3,245   8,058 
Rockford (Collins Aerospace Systems) Industrial  480   4,620   711   4,389 
Rockford (Sherwin-Williams Co.) Industrial  1,100   4,451   1,091   4,460 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO) Industrial  1,890   13,315   2,050   13,155 
Schaumburg (Chicago) Industrial  1,040   4,407   2,534   2,913 

11481
Table of Contents

  Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
               
Maryland:                  
Beltsville (Washington, DC) Industrial $3,200,000  $11,312,355  $3,843,707  $10,668,648 
Michigan:                  
Walker (Grand Rapids) Industrial  4,034,363   27,620,623   354,111   31,300,875 
Livonia (Detroit) Industrial  320,000   13,442,030   1,698,607   12,063,423 
Orion Industrial  4,649,971   18,235,665   4,019,239   18,866,397 
Romulus (Detroit) Industrial  531,000   4,136,506   1,922,903   2,744,603 
Minnesota:                  
Stewartville (Rochester) Industrial  900,000   4,320,000   443,077   4,776,923 
Mississippi:                  
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) Industrial  800,000   13,750,000   1,850,962   12,699,038 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool) Industrial  2,550,000   34,364,917   3,159,783   33,755,134 
Richland (Jackson) Industrial  211,000   1,689,691   904,133   996,558 
Ridgeland (Jackson) Industrial  218,000   1,640,591   1,246,001   612,590 
Missouri:                  
Kansas City (Bunzl) Industrial  1,000,000   8,651,226   646,520   9,004,706 
Kansas City (Kellogg) (1) Industrial  660,000   4,140,474   1,147,694   3,652,780 
Liberty (Kansas City) Industrial  723,000   6,674,881   3,325,236   4,072,645 
O’Fallon (St. Louis) Industrial  264,000   3,981,913   2,228,921   2,016,992 
St. Joseph Industrial  800,000   12,489,270   5,101,907   8,187,363 
Nebraska:                  
Omaha Industrial  1,170,000   4,774,691   2,233,901   3,710,790 
New Jersey:                  
Carlstadt (New York, NY) Industrial  1,194,000   3,709,589   939,584   3,964,005 
Somerset Shopping Center  34,317   3,038,573   1,494,297   1,578,593 
New York:                  
Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Industrial  4,796,765   6,164,058   1,692,362   9,268,461 
Halfmoon (Albany) Industrial  1,190,000   4,335,600   611,431   4,914,169 
Hamburg (Buffalo) Industrial  1,700,000   33,150,000   850,000   34,000,000 
Orangeburg (New York) (1) Industrial  694,720   3,200,955   2,436,637   1,459,038 
North Carolina:                  
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,305,000   28,739,797   1,471,238   31,573,559 
Concord (Charlotte) Industrial  4,306,684   35,736,461   152,720   39,890,425 
Fayetteville Industrial  172,000   5,279,629   2,698,223   2,753,406 
Winston-Salem Industrial  980,000   6,258,613   2,401,589   4,837,024 
Ohio:                  
Bedford Heights (Cleveland) Industrial  990,000   5,929,836   1,707,394   5,212,442 
Cincinnati Industrial  800,000   5,950,000   317,842   6,432,158 
Kenton Industrial  854,780   17,026,827   18,188   17,863,419 
Lebanon (Cincinnati) Industrial  240,000   4,212,425   594,620   3,857,805 
Monroe (Cincinnati) Industrial  1,800,000   11,137,000   737,707   12,199,293 
Richfield (Cleveland) Industrial  2,676,848   13,758,630   2,728,544   13,706,934 
Stow Industrial  1,429,715   17,504,350   -0-   18,934,065 
Streetsboro (Cleveland) Industrial  1,760,000   17,840,000   2,515,897   17,084,103 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) Industrial  695,000   5,038,686   2,125,801   3,607,885 
Oklahoma:                  
Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,410,000   11,174,462   1,306,735   11,277,727 
Oklahoma City (Bunzl) Industrial  844,688   7,883,751   50,537   8,677,902 
Tulsa Industrial  790,000   2,958,031   309,194   3,438,837 
Pennsylvania:                  
Altoona Industrial  1,200,000   7,808,650   784,660   8,223,990 
Imperial (Pittsburgh) Industrial  3,700,000   16,250,000   659,722   19,290,278 
Monaca (Pittsburgh) Industrial  401,716   7,484,125   2,642,181   5,243,660 

 

 Property    Buildings &  Accumulated  Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 (cont’d)  Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
Wheeling (Chicago) Industrial $5,112  $13,881  $5,210  $13,783 
Indiana:                  
Greenwood (Indianapolis) (ULTA) Industrial  2,250   35,515   4,906   32,859 
Greenwood (Indianapolis) (Amazon) Industrial  4,839   74,525   1,911   77,453 
Indianapolis (FDX Ground) Industrial  3,746   21,758   3,420   22,084 
Lafayette Industrial  2,802   22,277   667   24,412 
Iowa:                  
Urbandale (Des Moines) Industrial  310   2,234   1,377   1,167 
Kansas:                  
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (Carlstar Group) Industrial  1,185   6,098   2,847   4,436 
Edwardsville (Kansas City) (International Paper) Industrial  2,750   15,544   2,831   15,463 
Olathe (Kansas City) Industrial  2,350   29,476   3,140   28,686 
Topeka Industrial  0   3,680   1,085   2,595 
Kentucky:                  
Buckner (Louisville) Industrial  2,280   24,528   4,397   22,411 
Frankfort (Lexington) Industrial  1,850   26,150   3,911   24,089 
Louisvlle Industrial  1,590   9,714   1,079   10,225 
Louisiana:                  
Covington (New Orleans) Industrial  2,720   15,706   1,947   16,479 
Maryland:                  
Beltsville (Washington, DC) Industrial  3,200   11,312   4,748   9,764 
Michigan:                  
Walker (Grand Rapids) Industrial  4,034   27,621   2,479   29,176 
Livonia (Detroit) Industrial  320   13,560   2,767   11,113 
Orion Industrial  4,650   18,291   5,430   17,511 
Romulus (Detroit) Industrial  531   4,418   2,329   2,620 
Minnesota:                  
Stewartville (Rochester) Industrial  900   4,324   777   4,447 
Mississippi:                  
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) Industrial  800   13,750   2,909   11,641 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool) Industrial  2,550   34,365   5,813   31,102 
Richland (Jackson) Industrial  211   1,690   1,129   772 
Ridgeland (Jackson) Industrial  218   2,519   1,465   1,272 
Missouri:                  
Kansas City Industrial  1,000   9,003   1,408   8,595 
Liberty (Kansas City) Industrial  724   7,075   3,904   3,895 
O’Fallon (St. Louis) Industrial  264   3,986   2,614   1,636 
St. Joseph Industrial  800   12,598   6,158   7,240 
Nebraska:                  
Omaha Industrial  1,170   4,794   2,609   3,355 
New Jersey:                  
Carlstadt (New York, NY) Industrial  1,194   4,103   1,229   4,068 
Somerset Shopping Center  34   3,105   1,779   1,360 
Trenton Industrial  8,336   75,652   3,880   80,108 
New York:                  
Cheektowaga (Buffalo) Industrial  4,797   6,164   2,170   8,791 
Halfmoon (Albany) Industrial  1,190   4,537   945   4,782 
Hamburg (Buffalo) Industrial  1,700   33,432   3,436   31,696 
North Carolina:                  
Concord I (Charlotte) Industrial  4,305   28,749   4,002   29,052 
Concord II (Charlotte) Industrial  4,307   35,736   2,902   37,141 
Fayetteville Industrial  172   5,283   3,397   2,058 
Whitsett (Greensboro) Industrial  2,735   43,976   376   46,335 
Winston-Salem Industrial  980   6,284   3,057   4,207 

11582
Table of Contents

 Property    Buildings & Accumulated Net Book  Property    Buildings & Accumulated Net Book 
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 (cont’d) Type Land  Improvements  Depreciation  Value 
           
SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 (cont’d) Type Land Improvements Depreciation Value 
Ohio:                  
Bedford Heights (Cleveland) Industrial $990  $6,314  $2,310  $4,994 
Cincinnati Industrial  800   5,950   776   5,974 
Lancaster (Columbus) Industrial  959   16,599   213   17,345 
Kenton Industrial  855   17,876   1,449   17,282 
Lebanon (Cincinnati) Industrial  240   4,315   933   3,622 
Monroe (Cincinnati) Industrial  1,800   19,777   1,945   19,632 
Richfield (Cleveland) Industrial  2,677   13,770   3,800   12,647 
Stow Industrial  1,430   17,504   1,346   17,588 
Streetsboro (Cleveland) Industrial  1,760   17,840   3,888   15,712 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati) Industrial  695   5,039   2,663   3,071 
Oklahoma:                  
Oklahoma City (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,410   11,215   2,185   10,440 
Oklahoma City (Bunzl) Industrial  845   7,883   657   8,071 
Oklahoma City (Amazon) Industrial  1,618   28,260   2,052   27,826 
Oklahoma City (Amazon II) Industrial  1,378   13,584   14   14,948 
Tulsa Industrial  790   2,958   553   3,195 
Pennsylvania:                  
Altoona Industrial  1,200   7,823   1,392   7,631 
Imperial (Pittsburgh) Industrial  3,700   16,264   1,912   18,052 
Monaca (Pittsburgh) Industrial  402   7,551   3,481   4,472 
South Carolina:                                    
Aiken (Augusta, GA) Industrial $1,362,458  $19,677,937  $126,141  $20,914,254  Industrial  1,362   19,678   1,639   19,401 
Charleston (FDX) Industrial  4,639   16,880   1,265   

20,254

 
Charleston (FDX Ground) Industrial  7,103   39,473   2,193   44,383 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC) Industrial  1,670,000   13,743,307   2,302,265   13,111,042  Industrial  1,747   15,317   3,434   13,630 
Hanahan (Charleston)(SAIC) Industrial  1,129,000   12,245,441   3,961,769   9,412,672 
Hanahan (Charleston)(FDX Ground) Industrial  930,000   6,684,653   1,897,664   5,716,989 
Hanahan (Charleston) (SAIC) Industrial  1,129   13,334   5,256   9,207 
Hanahan (Charleston) (Amazon) Industrial  930   8,373   2,513   6,790 
Tennessee:                                    
Chattanooga Industrial  300,000   4,716,518   1,262,219   3,754,299  Industrial  300   5,069   1,678   3,691 
Lebanon (Nashville) Industrial  2,230,000   11,985,126   1,843,853   12,371,273  Industrial  2,230   11,985   2,766   11,449 
Memphis Industrial  1,240,887   13,381,050   2,573,085   12,048,852  Industrial  1,235   14,858   3,787   12,306 
Shelby County Vacant Land  11,065   -0-   -0-   11,065  Vacant Land  11   0   0   11 
Texas:                                    
Carrollton (Dallas) Industrial  1,500,000   16,319,203   3,130,523   14,688,680  Industrial  1,500   16,995   4,442   14,053 
Corpus Christi Industrial  -0-   4,771,913   672,040   4,099,873  Industrial  0   4,808   1,049   3,759 
Edinburg Industrial  1,000,000   11,039,014   1,188,983   10,850,031  Industrial  1,000   11,039   2,040   9,999 
El Paso Industrial  3,225,195   9,205,997   1,709,714   10,721,478  Industrial  3,225   9,206   2,512   9,919 
Ft. Worth (Dallas) Industrial  8,200,000   27,100,832   1,505,602   33,795,230  Industrial  8,200   27,419   3,627   31,992 
Houston Industrial  1,661,120   6,487,338   1,248,713   6,899,745  Industrial  1,661   6,530   1,825   6,366 
Lindale (Tyler) Industrial  540,000   9,396,500   722,416   9,214,084  Industrial  540   9,426   1,456   8,510 
Mesquite (Dallas) Industrial  6,247,658   43,632,835   279,698   49,600,795  Industrial  6,248   43,632   3,636   46,244 
Spring (Houston) Industrial  1,890,000   17,393,798   1,629,658   17,654,140  Industrial  1,890   17,439   2,979   16,350 
Waco Industrial  1,350,000   11,201,368   1,210,344   11,341,024  Industrial  1,350   11,201   2,075   10,476 
Utah:                  
Ogden (Salt Lake City) Industrial  1,287   11,380   97   12,570 
Virginia:                                    
Charlottesville Industrial  1,170,000   3,186,988   1,489,266   2,867,722  Industrial  1,170   3,292   1,801   2,661 
Mechanicsville (Richmond) Industrial  1,160,000   6,625,011   2,824,533   4,960,478  Industrial  1,160   6,667   3,375   4,452 
Richmond Industrial  446,000   4,322,309   1,409,820   3,358,489  Industrial  446   4,644   1,794   3,296 
Roanoke (CHEP USA) Industrial  1,853,000   5,552,447   1,516,288   5,889,159  Industrial  1,853   5,610   2,092   5,371 
Roanoke (FDX Ground) Industrial  1,740,000   8,460,000   930,962   9,269,038  Industrial  1,740   8,460   1,582   8,618 
Washington:                                    
Burlington (Seattle/Everett) Industrial  8,000,000   22,228,547   855,500   29,373,047  Industrial  8,000   22,371   2,572   27,799 
Wisconsin:                                    
Cudahy (Milwaukee) Industrial  980,000   8,402,361   3,075,370   6,306,991  Industrial  980   8,827   3,812   5,995 
Green Bay Industrial  590,000   5,980,000   613,333   5,956,667  Industrial  590   5,979   1,072   5,497 
Total as of September 30, 2017   $191,759,539  $1,261,075,064  $177,372,519  $1,275,462,084 
Total as of September 30, 2020   $250,497  $1,793,367  $296,020  $1,747,844 

(1)Classified as Real Estate Held for Sale.

11683
Table of Contents

NOTE 3 – ACQUISITIONS, EXPANSIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

Fiscal 20182021 Acquisitions accounted for as asset acquisitions

On November 2, 2017,December 17, 2020, we purchased a newly constructed 121,683500,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 16.2100.0 acres, located in Charleston, SC. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX), for 15 years through August 2032. The purchase price was $21,872,170. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $14,200,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.23%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,315,000.

On November 30, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 300,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 123.0 acres, located in Oklahoma City, OK. The building is 100% net-leased to Amazon.com Services, Inc. for 10 years through October 2027. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon.com, Inc. The purchase price was $30,250,000. We obtained a 10 year mortgage loan, amortizing over 18 years, of $19,600,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.64%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,884,000.

On January 22, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 831,764 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.4 acres, located in Savannah, GA. The building is 100% net-leased to Shaw Industries, Inc. for 10 years through September 2027. The purchase price was $57,483,636. We obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $33,300,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.53%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $3,551,000.

On April 6, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 399,440 square foot industrial building, situated on 27.5 acres, located in Daytona Beach, FL. The building is 100% net-leased to B. Braun Medical Inc. for 10 years through April 2028. The purchase price was $30,750,540. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.25%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,130,000.

On June 28, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 362,942 square foot industrial building, situated on 31.3 acres, located in Mobile, AL. The building is 100% net-leased to Amazon.com Services, Inc. for 11 years through November 2028. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon.com, Inc. The purchase price was $33,688,276. We obtained a 14 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.14%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,020,000.

On August 15, 2018, we purchased a newly constructed 265,318 square foot industrial building, situated on 48.9 acres, located in Charleston, SC.Columbus, OH MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2033.September 2035. The purchase price was $47,174,296.$73.3 million. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $29,860,000$47.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 3.82%2.95%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,713,000.$4.6 million.

On September 6, 2018,December 24, 2020, we purchased a newly constructed 373,750658,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 92.6130.2 acres, located in Braselton,the Atlanta, GA whichMSA. The building is100% net-leased to Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. for 20 years through November 2040. The purchase price was $95.9 million. We obtained a 17 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $57.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 3.25%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $5.5 million.

On July 29, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 144,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 43.4 acres, located in the Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).Burlington, VT MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through February 2033.May 2036. The property was acquired for a purchase price was $61,113,264. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $39,700,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.02%.$54.8 million. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $3,801,000.$3.2 million. Subsequent to the closing of the purchase, we obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $35.5 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.50%.

117
Table of Contents

On August 25, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 259,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 42.6 acres, located in the Knoxville, TN MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through May 2036. The property was acquired for a purchase price of $34.4 million. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $2.0 million. Subsequent to the closing of the purchase, we obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $22.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.50%.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 291,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 46.0 acres, located in the Birmingham, AL MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through July 2036. The property was acquired for a purchase price of $30.2 million. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $1.7 million. We obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.40%, which has not yet closed.

We evaluated the property acquisitions which took place during the twelve months ended September 30, 2018,2021, to determine whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business, pursuant to ASU 2017-01. Acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. Accordingly, we accounted for all sevenfour properties purchased during fiscal 20182021 as asset acquisitions and allocated the total cash consideration, including transaction costs of approximately $1,071,000,$720,000, to the individual assets acquired on a relative fair value basis. There were no liabilities assumed in these acquisitions. The financial information set forth below summarizes our purchase price allocation for these sevenfour properties acquired during the fiscal year 20182021 that were accounted for as asset acquisitions:acquisitions (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF PROPERTIES ACQUIRED DURING PERIOD ACCOUNTED FOR ASSET ACQUISITIONS

    
Land $37,330,383  $26,868 
Building  239,890,739   225,824 
In-Place Leases  6,181,731   6,466 
    

84
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the operating results included in our consolidated statements of income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20182021 for the sevenfour properties acquired during the twelve months ended September 30, 2018:2021 (in thousands):

SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS RESULT FOR 2021 PROPERTIES ACQUISITIONS

 Year Ended
9/30/2018
 
    Year Ended 9/30/2021 
Rental Revenues $7,429,989  $8,590 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  2,131,150 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders  3,089 

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s ultimate parent, FDX, Amazon.com, Inc.FedEx Corporation, and Shaw Industries, Inc.’sHome Depot U.S.A., Inc’s ultimate parent, Berkshire Hathaway,Home Depot, Inc., are publicly-ownedpublicly-listed companies and financial information related to these entities isare available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov.www.sec.gov. The references in this report to the SEC’s website are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information on thewww.sec.gov website.

Fiscal 20182021 Expansions

OnDuring fiscal 2021, we completed the first phase of a two-phase parking expansion project for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. at our property located in Olathe (Kansas City), KS. The first phase of this parking expansion project was completed for a total cost of $3.4 million, resulting in an initial increase in annual rent effective November 5, 2020 of approximately $340,000 from approximately $2.1 million, or $6.83 per square foot, to approximately $2.5 million, or $7.91 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent increased by 2.1% on June 1, 2017,2021 and will continue to increase 2.1% every five years, resulting in an annualized rent from November 5, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of approximately $2.6 million, or $8.15 per square foot. We recently began construction on the second phase of this parking expansion project at this location, which upon completion will further increase the rental rate and extend the lease term.

In addition, effective June 4, 2021, we completed a parking lot expansion for aUPS at our property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Indianapolis, IN was completedHalfmoon (Albany), NY for a total project cost of approximately $1,683,000,$835,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from April 2024 to October 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an initial increase in annual rent effective fromon the date of completion of approximately $184,000$52,000 from approximately $1,533,000,$510,000, or $4.67$6.80 per square foot, to approximately $1,715,000,$562,000, or $5.23$7.50 per square foot. Furthermore, annual rent will continue to increase each year by 2.0% resulting in an annualized rent from June 4, 2021 through the remaining term of the lease of approximately $622,000, or $8.29 per square foot.

On September 27, 2018, aWe have several FedEx Ground parking expansion projects in progress with more under discussion. Currently there are nine parking expansion projects underway, which we expect to cost approximately $42.6 million. These parking expansion projects will enable us to capture additional rent while lengthening the terms of these leases. We are also in discussions to expand the parking at eight additional locations bringing the total recently completed and likely future parking lot expansion projects to 18 currently.

Due to the proliferation of ecommerce sales and last mile deliveries, it is important to take into account the large amounts of real estate utilized for a property leasedtrailer, van, and car parking at many of our properties in determining how our in-place rental rates compare to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., located in Ft. Mill, SC was completedmarket rental rates for a total project cost of approximately $1,834,000, resultingproperties being used in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from October 2023 to August 2028. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $183,000 from approximately $1,415,000, or $8.00similar manner. Rents per square foot on properties that may be nearby, but have only limited acreage devoted to approximately $1,598,000, or $9.03 per square foot.parking, are poor comparisons as they cannot accommodate the same tenant needs.

Fiscal 2018 Dispositions2021 Disposition

Two leases were set to expire during fiscal 2018 with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) for our 65,067 square foot facility located in Kansas City, MO through July 31, 2018 and our 50,400 square foot facility located in Orangeburg, NY through February 28, 2018. Kellogg informed us that they would not be renewing these leases. On December 18, 2017, April 15, 2021, we sold our property located in Kansas City, MO for $4,900,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $4,602,000 and, on December 22, 2017, we sold our property located in Orangeburg, NY for $6,170,000, with net sale proceeds of approximately $5,898,000. In conjunction with the sale of these two properties, we simultaneously entered into a lease termination agreement for each property whereby we received a termination fee from Kellogg totaling approximately $210,000 which represents a weighted average of 80% of the then remaining rent due under each respective lease.

118
Table of Contents

On June 1, 2018, we sold a 68,37060,400 square foot building located in Colorado Springs, COCarlstadt, NJ which is in the New York, NY MSA, for $5,800,000, with net salegross proceeds of approximately $5,465,000.$13.0 million. Prior to the sale, we owned a 51% interest in this property. Our 51% portion of this property, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through September 2018. The tenant informed us that they would not be renewing this lease because they have moved their operations from our former 68,370 square foot facility to our newly constructed 225,362 square foot facility, which is also located in Colorado Springs, CO. On June 9, 2016, we purchased this newly constructed 225,362 square foot industrial building, which is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through January 2026.

On June 5, 2018, we sold an 87,500 square foot vacant building located in Ft. Myers, FL for $6,400,000, with netthe sale proceeds of approximately $6,119,000. Prior to this property becoming vacant, it was leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. through June 2017. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. vacated this property because they moved their operations to our newly constructed 213,672 square foot facility, which is also located in Ft. Myers, FL. We purchased this newly constructed facility on December 30, 2016 and it is leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 10 years through August 2027.

These four properties sold during fiscal 2018, resulted in a U.S. GAAP net realized gain applicable to common shareholders of approximately $7,485,000,$3.3 million, representing a 51%159% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a net realized gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis of approximately $1,160,000,$2.6 million, representing a 6%96% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis.

85
Table of Contents

 

Fiscal 20172020 Acquisitions accounted for as business combinations

On October 17, 2016,10, 2019, we purchased a newly constructed 338,584616,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 78.6 acres, located in Hamburg, NY, whichthe Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The building is100% net-leased to a subsidiary of Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Amazon) for 15 years through August 2034. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon. The purchase price was $81.5 million. We obtained an 18 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $52.5 million at a fixed interest rate of 4.27%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $5.0 million.

On March 30, 2020, we purchased a newly constructed 153,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 24.2 acres, located in the BuffaloColumbus, OH MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to Magna Seating of America, Inc. for 10 years through January 2030. The purchase price was $17.9 million. We obtained a 10 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $9.4 million at a fixed interest rate of 3.47%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $1.2 million.

On May 21, 2020, we purchased a newly constructed 286,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 39.3 acres, located in the Greensboro, NC MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through March 2031.April 2035. The purchase price was $35,100,000.$47.6 million. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $23,500,000$30.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 4.03%3.10%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,309,000. In connection with the acquisition, we completed our evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of our evaluation, we allocated $250,000 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place.$3.0 million.

On December 30, 2016,May 21, 2020, we purchased a newly constructed 213,67270,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 7.5 acres, located in Ft. Myers, FL.the Salt Lake City, UT MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Corporation for 1015 years through September 2026.March 2035. The purchase price was $21,001,538.$12.9 million. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $14,500,000$8.4 million at a fixed interest rate of 3.97%3.18%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,365,000. In connection with the acquisition, we completed our evaluation of the acquired lease. As a result of our evaluation, we allocated $201,538 to an Intangible Asset associated with the lease in-place. $772,000.

On September 1, 2017, a parking lot expansion for this property was completed for a cost of approximately $862,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2026 to August 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $53,000 from approximately $1,365,000 to approximately $1,418,000.

Fiscal 2017 Acquisitions accounted for as asset acquisitions

On April 5, 2017,15, 2020, we purchased a newly constructed 343,483121,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 21.5 acres, located in Walker, MI, which is in the Grand Rapids MSA.Oklahoma City, OK. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.a subsidiary of Amazon for 1510 years through January 2032.August 2030. The lease is guaranteed by Amazon. The purchase price was $32,120,000.$15.2 million. We obtained a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $20,875,000$9.8 million at a fixed interest rate of 3.86%3.00%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,102,000.$934,000.

On June 23, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 351,874 square foot industrial building located in Mesquite, TX, which is in the Dallas MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through March 2032. The purchase price was $50,621,072. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $32,900,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.60%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $3,194,000.

119
Table of Contents

On June 27, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 315,560 square foot industrial building located in Aiken, SC, which is in the Augusta, GA MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to Autoneum North America, Inc. for 15 years through April 2032. The purchase price was $21,933,000. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $15,350,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.20%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,700,000.

On June 28, 2017, we purchased a newly-constructed 237,756 square foot industrial building located in Homestead, FL, which is in the Miami MSA. The building is 100% net leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through March 2032. The purchase price was $38,347,933. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $24,800,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.60%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,282,000.

On June 29, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 110,361 square foot industrial building located in Oklahoma City, OK. The building is 100% net-leased to Bunzl Distribution Oklahoma, Inc. for seven years through August 2024. The purchase price was $9,000,000. We obtained a 12 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $6,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.125%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $721,000.

On August 3, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 354,482 square foot industrial building located in Concord, NC which is in the Charlotte MSA. The building is 100% net leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through May 2032. The purchase price was $40,598,446. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $26,184,000 at a fixed interest rate of 3.80%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $2,537,000.

On September 19, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 298,472 square foot industrial building located in Kenton, OH. The building is 100% net leased to International Paper Company for 10 years through August 2027. The purchase price was $18,299,032. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $12,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.45%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,243,000.

On September 29, 2017, we purchased a newly constructed 219,765 square foot industrial building located in Stow, OH. The building is 100% net leased to Mickey Thompson Performance Tires and Wheels for 10 years through August 2027. The purchase price was $19,500,000. We obtained a 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $12,700,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.17%. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $1,500,000.

We evaluated the property acquisitions which took place subsequentduring the twelve months ended September 30, 2020, to March 31, 2017, under the new framework for determiningdetermine whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business, pursuant to ASU 2017-01, which we early-adopted effective April 1, 2017.

2017-01. Acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. Accordingly, we accounted for theall five properties purchased in Walker (Grand Rapids), MI; Mesquite (Dallas), TX; Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC; Homestead (Miami), FL; Oklahoma City, OK; Concord (Charlotte), NC; Kenton, OH and Stow, OHduring fiscal 2020 as asset acquisitions and allocated the total cash consideration, including transaction costs of approximately $431,000,$179,000, to the individual assets acquired on a relative fair value basis. There were no liabilities assumed in these acquisitions. The financial information set forth below summarizes our purchase price allocation for these eightfive properties acquired during the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172020 that arewere accounted for as asset acquisitions:acquisitions (in thousands):

Land $23,507,073 
Building  202,529,177 
In-Place Leases  4,814,192 

SCHEDULE OF PROPERTIES ACQUIRED DURING PERIOD ACCOUNTED FOR ASSET ACQUISITIONS

120
Table of Contents
     
Land $11,198 
Building  160,064 
In-Place Leases  3,999 

The following table summarizes the operating results included in our consolidated statements of income for the yearsfiscal year ended September 30, 20172020 for the five properties acquired during the yeartwelve months ended September 30, 2017:2020 (in thousands):

 Year Ended
9/30/2017
  Year Ended 9/30/2020 
Rental Revenues $7,086,464  $6,846 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  2,156,885 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders  1,624 

 

86
Table of Contents

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s ultimate parent, FDX, International Paper Company and Mickey Thompson Performance Tires and Wheels ultimate parent, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company are publicly-owned companies and financial information related to these entities is available at the SEC’s website,www.sec.gov. Autoneum NorthFedEx Corporation, Magna Seating of America, Inc.’s ultimate parent, Autoneum Holding AG is a publicly-owned companyMagna International Inc. and financial information related to this entity is available at the Swiss Exchange’s website, https://www.six-swiss-exchange.com/index.htmlAmazon are publicly-listed companies that are considered Investment Grade by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and Bunzl Distribution Oklahoma, Inc.’s ultimate parent, Bunzl plc is a publicly-owned company and financial information related to this entity is available at the U.K. government’s website, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/companies-house.by Moody’s (www.moodys.com). The references in this report to the SEC’s website, the Swiss Exchange’sS&P Global Ratings’ website and the U.K. government’sMoody’s website are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information of S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on thosesuch websites.

2017 Expansions

On October 1, 2016, a 50,625 square foot expansion of the building leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Edinburg, TX was completed for a cost of approximately $4,762,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease, which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2021 to September 2026. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $499,000 from approximately $598,000, or $5.26 per square foot, to approximately $1,097,000, or $6.68 per square foot.

As discussed above, on September 1, 2017, a parking lot expansion for a property leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. located in Ft. Myers, FL was completed for a cost of approximately $862,000, resulting in a new 10 year lease which extended the prior lease expiration date from September 2026 to August 2027. In addition, the expansion resulted in an increase in annual rent effective from the date of completion of approximately $53,000 from approximately $1,365,000, or $6.39 per square foot to approximately $1,418,000, or $6.64 per square foot.

2017 Disposition

During the prior year, in October 2016, we sold our 59,425 square foot industrial building situated on 4.78 acres located in White Bear Lake, MN for net proceeds of approximately $4,126,000, which was approximately our carrying value.

Consolidated Statements of Income for the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 of properties sold during the periods presented

On April 15, 2021, we sold our 60,400 square foot building located in Carlstadt, NJ which is in the New York, NY MSA, for gross proceeds of $13.0 million. Prior to the sale, we owned a 51% interest in this property. Our 51% portion of the sale proceeds resulted in a U.S. GAAP net realized gain of approximately $3.3 million, representing a 159% gain over the depreciated U.S. GAAP basis and a net realized gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis of approximately $2.6 million, representing a 96% net gain over our historic undepreciated cost basis.

Prior to the sale, the 49% Non-controlling interest (“NCI”) did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations and accordingly was not separately presented in the financial statements. However, upon the sale of the property on April 15, 2021, we presented the effects of the NCI in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for all periods presented.

Since the sale of the four properties sold during fiscal 2018 (as discussed previously) and the onethis property sold during fiscal 2017, does not represent a strategic shift that has a major effect on our operations and financial results, the results of operations generated from these five propertiesthis property are not included in Discontinued Operations. There were no properties sold during fiscal 2019 or 2020. The following table summarizes (in thousands) the operations of these five properties,this property, prior to their sales,its sale, that areis included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016:2019:

SCHEDULE OF DISPOSITION AND REAL ESTATE CLASSIFIED AS HELD FOR SALE

121
Table of Contents
  2021  2020  2019 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $467  $702  $684 
Real Estate Taxes  (62)  (113)  (116)
Operating Expenses  (218)  (428)  (50)
Depreciation & Amortization  (244)  (149)  (123)
Interest Expense  (205)  (75)  (84)
Income from Operations  (262)  (63)  311 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  6,376   0   0 
Net Income  6,114   (63)  311 
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to
Non-Controlling Interest
  2,996   (31)  152 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders $3,118  $(32) $159 

  2018  2017  2016 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $928,808  $2,051,835  $2,138,713 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0- 
Real Estate Taxes  (211,928)  (351,645)  (341,174)
Operating Expenses  (109,735)  (169,605)  (104,363)
Depreciation & Amortization  (79,137)  (513,879)  (517,554)
Interest Expense  (38,272)  (143,510)  (221,595)
Income from Operations  699,997   873,196   954,027 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Real Estate Investment  7,485,266   (95,336)  -0- 
Net Income $8,185,263  $777,860  $954,027 

Pro forma information (unaudited)

The following unaudited pro formapro-forma condensed financial information has been prepared utilizing our historical financial statements, the effect of the reduction of revenue and expenses that will no longer be generated from a property that was sold on April 15, 2021 and the effect of additional revenue and expenses generated from the properties acquired and expanded subsequent to our fiscal yearend (see Note 17) and from the properties acquired and expanded during fiscal years 20182021 and 2017,fiscal 2020, assuming that thesethe property acquisitions, and these completed expansions and the sale of one property had occurred as of October 1, 2016,2019, after giving effect to certain adjustments including: (a) Rental Revenue adjustments resulting from the straight-lining of scheduled rent increases, (b) Interest Expense resulting from the assumed increase in Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable and Loans Payable related to the new acquisitions, and (c) Depreciation Expense related to the new acquisitions. As further described in Note 13,acquisitions and expansions. Furthermore, the net proceeds raised from the issuance of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock less the redemptions of our 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock redeemed on October 14, 2016 and our 7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock redeemed on June 7, 2017 were used to help fund property acquisitions and, therefore, the pro forma preferred dividend expense has been adjusted to account for its effect on Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders as if all the preferred stock issuances and redemptions had occurred on October 1, 2016. In addition, Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders excludes the operating expenses incurred during fiscal 2018 and 2017 for the five properties that were sold during the periods presented. Furthermore, the proceeds raised from the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the DRIP) were used to fund property acquisitions and expansions and therefore, the weighted average shares outstanding used in calculating the pro-forma Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders has been adjusted to account for the increase in shares raised throughissued pursuant to the DRIP, as if all such shares have been issued on October 1, 2019. Additionally, the net proceeds raised from the issuance of additional shares raisedof our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (6.125% Series C Preferred Stock), through our At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program were used to help fund property acquisitions and, therefore, the pro-forma preferred dividend has been adjusted to account for its effect on pro-forma Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders as if all the preferred stock issuances had occurred on October 1, 2016.2019. The unaudited pro formapro-forma condensed financial information is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved had the acquisitions and expansions reflected herein been consummated on the dates indicated or that will be achieved in the future.

  Fiscal Year 2018  Fiscal Year 2017 
Rental Revenues $130,401,800  $130,644,200 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  31,382,200   26,411,000 
Basic Net Income per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders $0.39  $0.32 
Diluted Net Income per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders $0.38  $0.32 

12287
Table of Contents

SCHEDULE OF PRO FORMA INFORMATION

                 
  

Fiscal Year Ended

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  2021  2020 
  As Reported  Pro-forma  As Reported  Pro-forma 
             
Rental Revenue $155,044  $163,097  $141,583  $162,463 
                 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common
Shareholders
 $44,764  $

43,020

  $(48,617) $(50,443)
                 
Basic Net Income (Loss) per
Share Attributable to Common Shareholders
 $0.46  $0.44  $(0.50) $(0.51)
Diluted Net Income (Loss) per
Share Attributable to Common Shareholders
 $0.45  $0.44  $(0.50) $(0.51)

NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Net intangible assets consist of the estimated value of the acquired in-place leases and the acquired above market rent leases at acquisition for the following properties and are amortized over the remaining term of the lease:lease. Intangible Assets, net of Accumulated Amortization is made up of the following balances as of September 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS UNDER LEASES IN-PLACE ACQUISITION

 September 30, 2018  

September 30, 2017

  As of 9/30/21 As of 9/30/20 
Topeka, KS $102,867  $137,156  $0  $34 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  2,283   9,134 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  91,595   183,191 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  119,926   140,783   57   78 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  105,293   125,349   45   65 
Edinburg, TX  166,122   223,078   0   52 
Corpus Christi, TX  66,912   89,853   0   21 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  157,578   207,339 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  54,402   147,663 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals)  703,205   886,650   153   336 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  239,464   307,882   34   103 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  21,984   26,695   8   13 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  329,941   351,816   264   286 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  366,666   441,243   143   218 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  201,312   236,323   96   131 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  22,545   24,659   16   18 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  68,348   76,159   45   53 
Kansas City, MO  15,325   20,434   0   5 
Monroe, OH (Cincinnati)  364,530   396,460   269   301 
Cincinnati, OH  39,246   42,814   28   32 
Imperial, PA (Pittsburgh)  61,617   70,116 
Burlington, WA (Seattle/Everett)  375,265   406,756 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  36   45 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  281   312 
Colorado Springs, CO  278,699   316,703   165   202 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  215,517   232,759   164   181 
Ft. Myers, FL  184,272   194,209   122   143 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  448,835   482,498   348   382 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  854,091   916,969   665   728 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  737,832   792,486   574   628 
Homestead (Miami), FL  513,201   551,216   399   437 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  240,468   281,110   118   159 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  581,352   623,890   454   496 
Kenton, OH  438,035   487,160 
Stow, OH  521,166   579,612 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  377,988   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  669,693   -0- 
Savannah, GA  1,402,816   -0- 
Daytona Beach, FL  765,687   -0- 
Mobile, AL  1,016,789   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  667,358   -0- 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  999,531   -0- 
Total Intangible Assets, net of Accumulated Amortization $14,589,756  $10,010,165 

88
Table of Contents

  As of 9/30/21  As of 9/30/20 
Kenton, OH $291  $340 
Stow, OH  346   404 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  296   324 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  448   522 
Savannah, GA (Shaw)  935   1,091 
Daytona Beach, FL  524   604 
Mobile, AL  717   817 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  532   577 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  792   861 
Trenton, NJ  1,192   1,303 
Savannah, GA (FDX Ground)  261   298 
Lafayette, IN  375   424 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (Amazon)  1,861   2,005 
Lancaster (Columbus), OH  299   335 
Whitsett (Greensboro), NC  897   963 
Ogden (Salt Lake City), UT  215   232 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon II)  246   273 
Plain City (Columbus), OH  1,527   0 
Locust Grove (Atlanta), GA  3,108   0 
Burlington, VT  1,048   0 
Kodak (Knoxville), TN  565   0 
Total Intangible Assets, net of Accumulated Amortization $20,959  $16,832 

Amortization expense related to the intangible assets attributable to acquired in-place leases was $1,510,660, $969,751$2.2 million, $2.0 million and $1,076,776$1.9 million for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. We estimate that the aggregate amortization expense for these existing intangible assets will be approximately $1,737,000, $1,589,000, $1,582,000, $1,431,000,$2.3 million, $2.1 million, $2.0 million, $1.9 million, and $1,263,000$1.9 million for each of the fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2023,2026, respectively. The amount that is being amortized into rental revenue related to the intangible assets attributable to acquired above market leases was $102,708$103,000 for the year ended September 30, 2018 and $101,968 for each of the years ended September 30, 20172021, 2020 and 2016, respectively.2019. We estimate that the aggregate amount that will be amortized into rental revenue for existing intangible assets will be approximately $103,000$34,000 for each of the fiscal years 2019, 2020 and 2021 and will be approximately $34,000 for the fiscal year 2022.

123
Table of Contents

NOTE 5 – SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had approximately 21,174,00024.9 million square feet of property, of which approximately 10,083,00011.6 million square feet, or 48%47%, consisting of 6065 separate stand-alone leases, were leased to FedEx Corporation (FDX) and its subsidiaries (7%(5% to FDX and 41%42% to FDX subsidiaries). These properties are located in 2427 different states. As of September 30, 2018,2021, the 6065 separate stand-alone leases that are leased to FDX and FDX subsidiaries had a weighted average lease maturity of 9.47.5 years. As of September 30, 2018,2021, in addition to FDX and its subsidiaries, the only tenants that leased 5%5% or more of our total square footage were FDX and its subsidiaries.subsidiaries of Amazon, which are parties to five separate stand-alone leases for properties located in four different states, containing 1.5 million total square feet, comprising 6% of our total leasable square feet. None of our properties are subject to a master lease or any cross-collateralization agreements. The tenants that leased more than 5% of total rentable square footage as of September 30, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 20162019 were as follows:

SCHEDULE OF CONCENTRATION OF RISK

 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 2019 
FDX and Subsidiaries  48%  50%  47%  47%  46%  47%
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation (lease commenced fiscal 2013, expanded fiscal 2016)  <5%   5%  5%
Subsidiaries of Amazon  6%  6%  <5%

During fiscal 2018,2021, the only tenanttenants that accounted for 5%5% or more of our rental and reimbursement revenue waswere FDX (including its subsidiaries). and subsidiaries of Amazon. Our rental and reimbursement revenue from FDX and its subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, totaled approximately $80,726,000, $68,151,000$104.3 million, $96.4 million and $52,793,000,$93.3 million, or 58% (7% from FDX and 51% from FDX subsidiaries), 59% (7% from FDX and 52% from FDX subsidiaries) and 55% (9% from FDX and 46% from FDX subsidiaries),calculated as a percentage of total rent and reimbursement revenues. revenues were, 57% (5% from FDX and 52% from FDX subsidiaries), 58% (5% from FDX and 53% from FDX subsidiaries) and 60% (5% from FDX and 55% from FDX subsidiaries). Subsidiaries of Amazon represented 6% of our Rental and Reimbursement Revenue for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 and 2020. Rental and Reimbursement Revenue from subsidiaries of Amazon for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 was less than 5% of our Rental and Reimbursement Revenue. No other tenant accounted for 5% or more of our total Rental and Reimbursement revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.

In addition

89
Table of Contents

FDX and Amazon are rated “BBB” and “AA”, respectively by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and are rated “Baa2” and “A1”, respectively by Moody’s (www.moodys.com), which are both considered “Investment Grade” ratings. The references in this report to real estate property holdings, we held $154,920,545 inthe SEC’s website, S&P Global Ratings’ website and Moody’s website are not intended to and do not include, or incorporate by reference into this report, the information of FDX, Amazon, S&P Global Ratings or Moody’s on such websites.

NOTE 6 – SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

Our Securities Available for Sale at Fair Value consists primarily of marketable REIT securities atcommon and preferred stock of other REITs with a fair value of $143.5 million as of September 30, 2018, representing 8.0%2021. We intend to limit the size of this portfolio to no more than approximately 5% of our undepreciated assets, (which is ourwhich we define as total assets excluding accumulated depreciation). These liquid real estate holdings are not included in calculating the tenant concentration ratios above and therefore further increasedepreciation. We continue to believe that our diversification. TheREIT securities portfolio provides us with additional diversification, income, a source of potential liquidity when needed and income, andalso serves as a proxy for real estate when more favorable risk adjusted returns are not available.

NOTE 6available in the private real estate markets. Our decision to reduce this threshold mainly stems from the implementation of accounting rule ASU 2016-01, “Financial InstrumentsSECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which took effect at the beginning of fiscal 2019. This new rule requires that quarterly changes in the market value of our marketable securities flow through our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The implementation of this accounting rule has resulted in increased volatility in our reported earnings and some of our key performance metrics. Total assets excluding accumulated depreciation were $2.6 billion as of September 30, 2021. Our securities available for sale consist primarily of marketable common and preferred stock securities of other REITs. We generally limit our$143.5 million investment in marketable REIT securities to be no more than approximately 10%as of September 30, 2021 represented 5.6% of our undepreciated assets (which isassets.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, our total assets excluding accumulated depreciation).preferred stock investment in UMH’s 8.00% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock was redeemed and called for redemption at its liquidation value, which was equal to our cost basis. In addition, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, we also sold marketable REIT securities for gross proceeds totaling $16.3 million with an original cost basis of $14.1 million, resulting in a realized gain of $2.2 million. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, one of our preferred stock investments was called for redemption at its liquidation value, which was equal to our cost basis. Other than these two Preferred Stock redemptions and the sales of securities that took place during fiscal 2021, there have been no open market purchases or sales of securities during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019. We do not own more than 10%recorded the following realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions for the outstanding sharesfiscal years ended September 30 (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF GAIN (LOSS) ON SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS, NET

  2021  2020  2019 
Gross realized gains $2,248  $0  $0 
Gross realized losses  0   0   0 
Gains on Sale of Securities Transactions, net $2,248  $0  $0 

We recognized dividend income from our portfolio of anyREIT investments for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019 of these issuers, nor do we have a controlling financial interest.$6.2 million, $10.4 million and $15.2 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2021, we had total net unrealized holding losses on our securities portfolio of $76.6 million. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01, On October 1, 2018, we held $154,920,545recorded a $(24.7) million adjustment to beginning Undistributed Income (Loss). In addition, $50.2 million, $(77.4) million and $(24.7) million of the net unrealized holding gains (losses) have been reflected as Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Periods in marketable REIT securities, representing 8.0%the accompanying Consolidated Statements of our undepreciated assets.Income (Loss) for the fiscal years ended 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The components of the Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Periods included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the fiscal years ended September 30 (in thousands) are as follows:

SCHEDULE OF UNREALIZED LOSS ON INVESTMENTS

  2021  2020  2019 
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) $52,487  $(77,380) $(24,680)
Reclassification Adjustment for Net (Gains) Realized in Income  (2,248)  0   0 
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Period $50,239  $(77,380) $(24,680)

90
Table of Contents

We normally hold REIT securities long-term and have the ability and intent to hold these securities to recovery. We have total net unrealized losses ondetermined that none of our securities portfolio of $24,744,579 as of September 30, 2018.

We held eight securities that we determined were temporarily impaired investments as of September 30, 2018. We consider many factors in determining whether a security isholdings are other than temporarily impaired includingand therefore all unrealized gains and losses from these securities have been recognized as Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the naturePeriods in our Consolidated Statements of the security and the cause, severity and durationIncome (Loss). If we were to determine any of the impairment. The following is a summary ofour securities to be other than temporarily impaired, securities at September 30, 2018:we would present these unrealized holding losses as an impairment charge in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

124
Table of Contents

  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer 
     Unrealized     Unrealized 
Description of Securities Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
             
Preferred stock $3,194,000  $(1,613,782) $-0-  $-0- 
Common stock  93,367,200   (30,622,150)  -0-   -0- 
Total $96,561,200  $(32,235,932) $-0-  $-0- 

The following is a summary of the range of losses:

Number of

Individual

Securities

 

 

Fair

Value

  

 

Unrealized

Losses

  % Loss 
          
2 $21,980,000  $(351,051)  0-5%
2  31,996,000   (3,562,067)  6-10%
1  5,593,000   (825,791)  13%
2  21,032,200   (9,931,597)  30-40%
1  15,960,000   (17,565,426)  52%
8 $96,561,200  $(32,235,932)    

We had a $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 margin loan balance as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The margin loan balance is collateralized by the securities portfolio. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

Dividend income for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 totaled $13,099,317, $6,919,973, and $5,607,403, respectively.

We received proceeds of $2,620,166, $17,274,946 and $22,774,768 on sales or redemptions of securities available for sale during fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We recorded the following realized Gain on Sale of Securities Transactions, net for the fiscal years ended September 30:

  2018  2017  2016 
Gross realized gains $112,272  $2,320,561  $4,403,724 
Gross realized losses  (885)  (8,847)  (5,125)
Gains on Sale of Securities Transactions, net $111,387  $2,311,714  $4,398,599 

125
Table of Contents

The following is a listing of our investments in securities at September 30, 2018:2021 (in thousands):

SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES

Description Series  Interest Rate/ Dividend  Number of Shares  Cost  Fair Value 
Equity Securities - Preferred Stock:                    
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  D   7.375%  400  $7,967  $640 
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.  B   7.25%  6   136   148 
iStar Inc.  D   8.00%  10   232   262 
iStar Inc.  I   7.50%  60   1,301   1,533 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  D   6.875%  120   2,150   1,524 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  B   7.375%  120   2,216   1,643 
Total Equity Securities - Preferred Stock             $14,002  $5,750 

 

Description Series Interest Rate/ Dividend  Number of Shares  Cost  Estimated
Market Value
 
Equity Securities - Preferred Stock:                   
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  D  7.375%  200,000  $4,807,782  $3,194,000 
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.  B  7.25%  5,789   135,893   143,277 
Dynex Capital, Inc.  A  8.50%  10,000   250,000   254,400 
iStar Financial, Inc.  D  8.00%  3,468   71,502   86,492 
iStar Financial, Inc.  I  7.50%  41,383   872,236   1,005,603 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)  B  8.00%  100,000   2,500,000   2,625,700 
Total Equity Securities - Preferred Stock            $8,637,413  $7,309,472 
Description Number of Shares  Cost  Fair Value 
Equity Securities - Common Stock:            
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  4,000  $33,525  $736 
Diversified Healthcare Trust  1,100   17,871   3,729 
Franklin Street Properties Corp.  1,000   8,478   4,640 
Kimco Realty Corporation  1,700   27,937   35,275 
Office Properties Income Trust  659   37,892   16,692 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  1,800   13,443   3,492 
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.  600   12,300   9,780 
VEREIT, Inc.  700   27,891   31,661 
Washington Prime Group Inc.  167   11,860   135 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)  1,381   14,870   31,614 
Total Equity Securities - Common Stock     $206,067  $137,754 

Description Number of Shares  Cost  Estimated
Market Value
 
Equity Securities - Common Stock:            
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  4,000,000  $33,525,425  $15,960,000 
Franklin Street Properties  700,000   6,418,791   5,593,000 
Government Properties Income Trust  1,580,000   26,156,016   17,838,200 
Industrial Logistics Property Trust  100,000   2,116,778   2,301,000 
Kimco Realty Corporation  1,200,000   20,337,749   20,088,000 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  200,000   1,993,302   1,892,000 
Select Income REIT  800,000   17,394,728   17,552,000 
Senior Housing Property Trust  900,000   15,463,221   15,804,000 
VEREIT, Inc.  3,100,000   25,016,451   22,506,000 
Washington Prime Group, Inc.  1,300,000   10,541,616   9,490,000 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)  1,188,220   12,060,637   18,583,765 
Total Equity Securities - Common Stock     $171,024,714  $147,607,965 
Description Interest Rate/ Dividend  Number of Shares  Cost  Fair Value 
Modified Pass-Through Mortgage-Backed Securities:                
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)  6.50%  500  $1  $1 
                 
Total Securities Available for Sale         $220,070  $143,505 

  Interest Rate/ Dividend  Number of Shares  Cost  Estimated
Market Value
 
Modified Pass-Through Mortgage-Backed Securities:                
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)  6.50%  500,000  $2,997  $3,108 
                 
Total Securities Available for Sale         $179,665,124  $154,920,545 
(1)Investment is in a related company. See Note No. 11 for further discussion.

(1) Investment is in a related company. See Note No. 11 for further discussion.

12691
Table of Contents

The following is a listing of our investments in securities at September 30, 2017:2020 (in thousands):

Description Series Interest Rate/ Dividend  Number of Shares  Cost  Estimated
Market Value
 
Equity Securities - Preferred Stock:                   
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  D  7.375%  200,000  $4,807,782  $4,888,000 
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.  B  7.25%  13,153   308,759   332,508 
Dynex Capital, Inc.  A  8.50%  10,000   250,000   252,500 
Investors Real Estate Trust  B  7.95%  20,000   500,000   501,796 
iStar Financial, Inc.  D  8.00%  3,468   71,502   87,744 
iStar Financial, Inc.  E  7.875%  3,400   54,116   85,510 
iStar Financial, Inc.  F  8.00%  20,000   429,846   503,200 
iStar Financial, Inc.  I  7.50%  41,383   872,236   1,038,713 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  A  8.25%  44,000   1,100,885   1,107,040 
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.  B  7.875%  10,000   250,000   255,617 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)  B  8.00%  100,000   2,500,000   2,766,000 
Total Equity Securities - Preferred Stock            $11,145,126  $11,818,628 
Description Series  Interest Rate/ Dividend  Number of Shares  Cost  Fair Value 
Equity Securities - Preferred Stock:                    
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  D   7.375%  400  $7,967  $304 
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.  B   7.25%  6   136   109 
iStar Inc.  D   8.00%  10   232   253 
iStar Inc.  I   7.50%  60   1,301   1,452 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  D   6.875%  120   2,150   610 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  B   7.375%  120   2,216   606 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1) (2)  B   8.00%  100   2,500   2,526 
Total Equity Securities - Preferred Stock             $16,502  $5,860 

Description Number of Shares Cost Estimated
Market Value
  Number of Shares Cost Fair Value 
Equity Securities - Common Stock:                        
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.  2,700,000  $25,348,070  $22,653,000   4,000  $33,525  $644 
Franklin Street Properties  250,000   2,511,460   2,655,000 
Government Properties Income Trust  1,070,000   19,295,940   20,083,900 
Diversified Healthcare Trust  1,100   17,871   3,872 
Five Star Senior Living Inc.  75   290   378 
Franklin Street Properties Corp.  1,000   8,478   3,660 
Industrial Logistics Property Trust  700   13,789   15,309 
Kimco Realty Corporation  1,700   27,937   19,142 
Office Properties Income Trust  659   37,892   13,655 
Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust  100,000   1,028,213   1,049,000   1,800   13,443   997 
Select Income REIT  620,000   13,907,816   14,520,400 
Senior Housing Property Trust  700,000   12,325,801   13,685,000 
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.  600   12,300   3,618 
VEREIT, Inc.  1,880,000   15,967,690   15,585,200   3,500   27,891   22,750 
Washington Prime Group, Inc.  500,000   4,428,175   4,165,000 
Washington Prime Group Inc.  1,500   11,860   971 
UMH Properties, Inc. (1)  1,128,315   11,231,851   17,545,306   1,328   13,858   17,975 
Total Equity Securities - Common Stock     $106,045,016  $111,941,806      $219,134  $102,971 

 Interest Rate/ Dividend Number of Shares Cost Estimated
Market Value
 
Description Interest Rate/ Dividend Number of Shares Cost Fair Value 
Modified Pass-Through Mortgage-Backed Securities:                                
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)  6.50%  500,000  $4,063  $4,336   6.50%  500  $1  $1 
                                
Total Securities Available for Sale         $117,194,205  $123,764,770          $235,637  $108,832 

(1)Investment is in a related company. See Note No. 11 for further discussion.
(2)Subsequent to fiscal yearend 2020, UMH redeemed all their 8.00% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends.

(1) Investment is in a related company. See Note No. 11 for further discussion.

12792
Table of Contents

NOTE 7- MORTGAGE NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE

Mortgage Notes Payable:

As of September 30, 2021, we owned 122 properties, of which 60 carried Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable represents thewith outstanding principal amounts outstanding as of September 30, 2018.balances totaling $839.6 million. Interest is payable on these mortgages at fixed rates ranging from 3.45%2.95% to 7.60%6.75%, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.07%3.86%. This compares to a weighted average interest rate of 4.18%3.98% as of September 30, 2017.2020. As of September 30, 2018,2021, the weighted average loan maturity of the Mortgage Notes Payable was 11.7 years.10.9 years. This compares to a weighted average loan maturity of the Mortgage Notes Payable of 11.611.1 years as of September 30, 2017.2020.

As described in Note 3, during fiscal year ended September 30, 2018,2021, we entered into seventwo mortgages in connection with two of the four acquisitions of properties in Charleston, SC (FDX); Oklahoma City, OK; Savannah, GA; Daytona Beach, FL; Mobile, AL, Charleston, SC (FDX Ground) and Braselton (Atlanta), GA.we acquired during the 2021 fiscal year. These seventwo mortgages consisted of four one 15 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans, two 14loan and one 17 year fully-amortizing mortgage loans and one 10 year loan amortizing over 18 years.loan. These seventwo mortgage loans originally totaled $175,160,000,$104.0 million, with an original weighted average mortgage loan maturity of 14.116.1 years andwith interest rates ranging from 2.95% to 3.25% resulting in a weighted average interest rate of 3.91%3.11%. In connection with the remaining two properties acquired during the 2021 fiscal year, we entered into commitments for two, 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loans. These four fully-amortizing loans have a weighted average term of 15.7 years. The principal amount of the four mortgage loans originally totaled $161.8 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.50% to 3.25%, resulting in a weighted average fixed interest rate of 2.89%.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 27, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 291,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 46.0 acres, located in the Birmingham, AL MSA. The building is 100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through July 2036. The property was acquired for a purchase price of $30.2 million. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages $1.7 million. We obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $19.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 2.40%, which has not yet closed.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018,2021, we fully repaid theprepaid four self-amortizing mortgage loans for five of our properties located in Colorado Springs, CO; RichfieldCarlstadt, NJ, Houston, TX, Kansas City, KS and Topeka, KS. These loans were at a weighted average interest rate of 5.35%. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on November 1, 2021, we fully prepaid a $7.3 million mortgage loan for our property located in Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH; Tampa, FL; West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH and Orlando, FL, totaling approximately $12,487,000.OH. The loan had an interest rate of 5.5%.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017,2020, we fully repaid 16two self-amortizing mortgage loans associated with 15 offor our properties located in Jacksonville, FL; El Paso, TX; Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH; Halfmoon (Albany), NY; Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH; Hanahan (Charleston), SC; Elgin (Chicago), IL; Kansas City, MO; Chattanooga, TN; Roanoke, VA; Orion, MI; Edwardsville, KS; Punta Gorda, FL; Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NYAugusta, GA and Cocoa, FL, totaling approximately $40,037,000.Huntsville, AL. These loans were at a weighted average interest rate of 5.52%.

The following is a summary of our Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017:2020 (in thousands):

SUMMARY OF FIXED RATE MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

 Amount Weighted Average Interest Rate (1) Amount Weighted Average Interest Rate (1) 
 9/30/2018 9/30/2017  9/30/21 9/30/20 
 Amount Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate (1)
 Amount Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate (1)
  Amount Weighted Average Interest Rate (1) Amount Weighted Average Interest Rate (1) 
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable $719,768,355   4.07% $598,962,567   4.18% $839,622   3.86% $807,371   3.98%
                                
Debt Issuance Costs $11,715,985      $10,597,083      $12,643      $12,377     
Accumulated Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs  (3,493,279)      (2,998,887)      (5,205)      (4,513)    
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs $8,222,706      $7,598,196      $7,438      $7,864     
                                
Fixed Rate Mortgage Notes Payable, net of Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs $711,545,649      $591,364,371      $832,184      $799,507     

(1)(1)Weighted average interest rate excludes amortization of debt issuance costs.

12893
Table of Contents

The following is a summary of our mortgage notes payable by property at September 30, 20182021 and 2017:2020 (in thousands):

SUMMARY OF MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

 

Property

    

Fixed

Rate

  

Maturity

Date

 Balance
9/30/18
  

Balance

9/30/17

 
               
Richfield, OH (Cleveland)  (1)   5.22% 01/01/18 $-0-  $2,724,856 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  (1)   5.65% 04/01/18  -0-   3,654,913 
West Chester Twp., OH (Cincinnati)  (1)   6.80% 06/01/18  -0-   1,820,753 
Orlando, FL  (1)   6.56% 10/01/18  -0-   4,098,856 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)      6.00% 03/01/19  5,144,319   5,910,953 
Lebanon, TN (Nashville)      7.60% 07/10/19  7,217,469   7,446,653 
Ft. Mill, SC (Charlotte, NC)      7.00% 10/10/19  724,766   1,346,845 
Denver, CO      6.07% 11/01/19  414,049   746,617 
Hanahan, SC (Charleston)(FDX Ground)      5.54% 01/21/20  465,749   773,234 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)      5.54% 02/01/20  338,789   562,454 
Huntsville, AL      5.50% 03/01/20  370,903   589,073 
Colorado Springs, CO  (1)   5.41% 01/01/21  -0-   1,043,704 
Topeka, KS      6.50% 08/10/21  860,364   1,119,836 
Streetsboro, OH (Cleveland)      5.50% 11/01/21  9,300,481   9,887,817 
Kansas City, MO      5.18% 12/01/21  6,633,001   6,799,803 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN)(Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)      4.80% 04/01/22  7,564,186   8,171,480 
Waco, TX      4.75% 08/01/22  4,234,777   4,524,045 
Houston, TX      6.88% 09/10/22  2,148,201   2,619,835 
Tolleson, AZ (Phoenix)      3.95% 11/01/22  3,719,709   4,525,118 
Edwardsville, KS (Kansas City)(International Paper)      3.45% 11/01/23  9,189,343   9,931,292 
Spring, TX (Houston)      4.01% 12/01/23  7,924,865   8,537,878 
Memphis, TN      4.50% 01/01/24  5,061,376   5,882,668 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)      4.35% 07/01/24  3,416,097   3,919,663 
Indianapolis, IN      4.00% 09/01/24  10,437,151   11,381,906 
Frankfort, KY (Lexington)      4.84% 12/15/24  16,639,132   17,560,855 
Carrollton, TX (Dallas)      6.75% 02/01/25  6,455,552   7,233,486 
Altoona, PA  (2)   4.00% 10/01/25  3,253,281   3,642,839 
Green Bay, WI  (2)   4.00% 10/01/25  2,640,432   2,956,605 
Stewartville, MN (Rochester)  (2)   4.00% 10/01/25  2,115,962   2,369,334 
Carlstadt, NJ (New York, NY)      5.25% 05/15/26  1,580,181   1,743,353 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)      3.84% 07/01/26  4,395,246   4,867,194 
Livonia, MI (Detroit)      4.45% 12/01/26  6,294,503   6,912,375 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)      3.64% 12/01/27  19,013,593   -0- 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN)(Milwaukee Tool)      3.76% 10/01/28  21,722,567   23,461,936 
Tulsa, OK      4.58% 11/01/28  1,685,288   1,812,575 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)      4.13% 07/01/29  5,537,962   5,935,346 
Lindale, TX (Tyler)      4.57% 11/01/29  5,638,258   6,016,758 
Sauget, IL (St. Louis, MO)      4.40% 11/01/29  8,563,797   9,145,097 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)      3.93% 12/01/29  16,243,754   17,370,102 
Imperial, PA (Pittsburgh)      3.63% 04/01/30  11,199,661   11,963,800 
Monroe, OH (Cincinnati)      3.77% 04/01/30  7,126,384   7,608,083 
Greenwood, IN (Indianapolis)      3.91% 06/01/30  20,159,025   21,485,141 
Ft. Worth, TX (Dallas)      3.56% 09/01/30  20,753,864   22,116,268 
Concord, NC (Charlotte)      3.87% 12/01/30  17,813,451   18,928,835 
Covington, LA (New Orleans)      4.08% 01/01/31  11,133,990   11,814,941 
Burlington, WA (Seattle/Everett)      3.67% 05/01/31  17,757,364   18,839,050 
Louisville, KY      3.74% 07/01/31  6,525,135   6,914,142 
Colorado Springs, CO      3.90% 07/01/31  16,651,710   17,632,728 
Davenport, FL (Orlando)      3.89% 09/01/31  23,702,918   25,077,642 
Olathe, KS (Kansas City)      3.96% 09/01/31  19,956,867   21,108,249 
Hamburg, NY (Buffalo)      4.03% 11/01/31  21,328,714   22,532,881 
Ft. Myers, FL (FDX Ground)      3.97% 01/01/32  13,280,803   14,021,964 
Savannah, GA      3.53% 02/01/32  32,215,696   -0- 
Walker, MI (Grand Rapids)      3.86% 05/01/32  19,468,554   20,530,135 
Mesquite, TX (Dallas)      3.60% 07/01/32  30,928,224   32,623,355 

 

Property

   

Fixed

Rate

  

Maturity

Date

 

Balance

9/30/21

  

Balance

9/30/20

 
Topeka, KS (1)  6.50% 08/10/21 $0  $288 
Streetsboro, OH (Cleveland) (2)  5.50% 11/01/21  7,332   8,025 
Kansas City, MO (1)  5.18% 12/01/21  0   6,273 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN)(Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)    4.80% 04/01/22  5,558   6,259 
Waco, TX    4.75% 08/01/22  3,280   3,613 
Houston, TX (1)  6.88% 09/10/22  0   1,102 
Tolleson, AZ (Phoenix)    3.95% 11/01/22  1,103   2,010 
Edwardsville, KS (Kansas City)(International Paper)    3.45% 11/01/23  6,804   7,627 
Spring, TX (Houston)    4.01% 12/01/23  5,931   6,623 
Memphis, TN    4.50% 01/01/24  2,364   3,304 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)    4.35% 07/01/24  1,767   2,341 
Indianapolis, IN    4.00% 09/01/24  7,366   8,431 
Frankfort, KY (Lexington)    4.84% 12/15/24  13,483   14,611 
Carrollton, TX (Dallas)    6.75% 02/01/25  3,781   4,733 
Altoona, PA (3)  4.00% 10/01/25  1,987   2,426 
Green Bay, WI (3)  4.00% 10/01/25  1,613   1,971 
Stewartville, MN (Rochester) (3)  4.00% 10/01/25  1,292   1,578 
Carlstadt, NJ (New York, NY) (4)  5.25% 05/15/26  0   1,227 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)    3.84% 07/01/26  2,866   3,395 
Livonia, MI (Detroit)    4.45% 12/01/26  4,267   4,973 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)    3.64% 12/01/27  16,501   17,369 
Olive Branch, MS (Memphis, TN) (Milwaukee Tool)    3.76% 10/01/28  16,095   18,042 
Tulsa, OK    4.58% 11/01/28  1,267   1,413 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)    4.13% 07/01/29  4,243   4,692 
Lindale, TX (Tyler)    4.57% 11/01/29  4,393   4,827 
Sauget, IL (St. Louis, MO)    4.40% 11/01/29  6,659   7,322 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)    3.93% 12/01/29  12,587   13,854 
Lancaster (Columbus), OH    3.47% 01/01/30  8,311   9,091 
Imperial, PA (Pittsburgh)    3.63% 04/01/30  8,734   9,586 
Monroe, OH (Cincinnati) (5)  3.77% 04/01/30  5,567   6,107 
Monroe, OH (Cincinnati) (5)  3.85% 04/01/30  5,886   6,453 
Greenwood, IN (Indianapolis) (ULTA)    3.91% 06/01/30  15,855   17,346 
Ft. Worth, TX (Dallas)    3.56% 09/01/30  16,364   17,879 
Concord, NC (Charlotte)    3.87% 12/01/30  14,197   15,449 
Covington, LA (New Orleans)    4.08% 01/01/31  8,917   9,686 
Burlington, WA (Seattle/Everett)    3.67% 05/01/31  14,264   15,471 
Louisville, KY    3.74% 07/01/31  5,267   5,702 
Colorado Springs, CO    3.90% 07/01/31  13,469   14,571 
Davenport, FL (Orlando)    3.89% 09/01/31  19,243   20,788 
Olathe, KS (Kansas City)    3.96% 09/01/31  16,217   17,513 
Hamburg, NY (Buffalo)    4.03% 11/01/31  17,411   18,770 
Ft. Myers, FL    3.97% 01/01/32  10,873   11,707 
Savannah, GA (Shaw)    3.53% 02/01/32  26,273   28,324 
Walker, MI (Grand Rapids)    3.86% 05/01/32  16,027   17,219 
Mesquite, TX (Dallas)    3.60% 07/01/32  25,461   27,350 
Aiken, SC (Augusta, GA)    4.20% 07/01/32  12,003   12,861 
Homestead, FL (Miami)    3.60% 07/01/32  19,193   20,616 
Mobile, AL    4.14% 07/01/32  15,609   16,728 
Concord, NC (Charlotte)    3.80% 09/01/32  20,587   22,067 
Kenton, OH    4.45% 10/01/32  9,592   10,247 
Stow, OH    4.17% 10/01/32  10,106   10,809 
Charleston, SC (FDX)    4.23% 12/01/32  11,444   12,222 
Daytona Beach, FL    4.25% 05/31/33  16,170   17,219 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)    3.82% 09/01/33  25,171   26,794 

12994
Table of Contents

 

Property

 

Fixed

Rate

  

Maturity

Date

 

Balance

9/30/18

  

Balance

9/30/17

 
Aiken, SC (Augusta, GA)  4.20% 07/01/32 $14,471,117  $15,227,062 
Homestead, FL (Miami)  3.60% 07/01/32  23,313,676   24,591,465 
Mobile, AL  4.14% 07/01/32  18,832,395   -0- 
Concord, NC (Charlotte)  3.80% 09/01/32  24,863,355   26,184,000 
Kenton, OH  4.45% 10/01/32  11,473,387   12,000,000 
Stow, OH  4.17% 10/01/32  12,130,343   12,700,000 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  4.23% 12/01/32  13,683,131   -0- 
Daytona Beach, FL  4.25% 05/31/33  19,187,819   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  3.82% 09/01/33  29,860,000   -0- 
Braselton, GA (Atlanta)  4.02% 10/01/33  39,700,000   -0- 
Buckner, KY (Louisville)  4.17% 11/01/33  15,305,669   16,014,719 
Total Mortgage Notes Payable       $719,768,355  $598,962,567 

 

Property

   

Fixed

Rate

  

Maturity

Date

 

Balance

9/30/21

  

Balance

9/30/20

 
Braselton, GA (Atlanta)    4.02% 10/01/33 $33,730  $35,856 
Buckner, KY (Louisville)   4.17% 11/01/33  12,993   13,796 
Trenton, NJ    4.13% 11/01/33  47,039   49,955 
Savannah, GA (FDX Ground)    4.40% 12/01/33  15,091   16,001 
Lafayette, IN    4.25% 08/01/34  15,234   16,101 
Whitsett (Greensboro), NC    3.10% 06/01/35  28,277   29,902 
Ogden (Salt Lake City), UT    3.18% 06/01/35  7,805   8,251 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)    3.00% 10/01/35  9,272   9,750 
Plain City (Columbus), OH    2.95% 01/01/36  45,322   0 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (Amazon II)    4.27% 11/01/37  48,802   50,855 
Locust Grove (Atlanta), GA    3.25% 01/01/38  55,307   0 
Total Mortgage Notes Payable         $839,622  $807,371 

(1)Loan was prepaidpaid in full during fiscal 2018.2021.
(2)Loan was paid in full subsequent to fiscal yearend 2021 on November 1, 2021.
(3)One self-amortizing loan is secured by Altoona, PA, Green Bay, WI and Stewartville (Rochester), MN.
(4)This property was sold during fiscal 2021 and loan was paid in full at closing.
(5)Two self-amortizing loans secured by same property.

Principal on the foregoing debt at September 30, 20182021 is scheduled to be paid as follows:follows (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF MATURITIES OF LONG-TERM DEBT

Year Ending September 30, 2019 $60,151,223 
2020 48,605,542 
2021 50,098,257 
       2021 
2022 72,031,353 Year Ending September 30,   2022  $81,537 
2023 50,522,349     2023   67,234 
2024    2024   80,674 
2025    2025   75,069 
2026    2026   66,263 
Thereafter  438,359,631     Thereafter   468,845 
 $719,768,355 
Total        $839,622 

The above table does not include a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%, which was obtained subsequent to the 2018 fiscal yearend in connection with the purchase of a property for approximately $85,248,000.

Loans Payable:

BMO Capital Markets

On August 27, 2015, we obtained anThe $250.0 million Loans Payable represents our $75.0 million unsecured revolvingterm loan (the “Term Loan”) and $175.0 drawn down under our unsecured line of credit facility (the “Facility”“Revolver”). The Facility is syndicated with three banks led by BMO, as sole lead arrangerOn November 15, 2019, we entered into a new line of credit facility (the “New Facility”) consisting of a $225.0 million Revolver and sole book runner, Bank of Montreal as administrative agent, and includes JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (J.P. Morgan) and RBC Capital Markets (RBC) as co-syndication agents. The Facility provided for up to $130,000,000a new $75.0 million Term Loan, resulting in available borrowings with a $70,000,000 accordion feature, bringing the total potential availability up to $200,000,000, subject to certain conditions. The Facility was set to mature in August 2019under both the Revolver and had a one-year extension option, at our option. On September 30, 2016, we entered intothe Term Loan of $300.0 million, which is an amendment toadditional $100.0 million over the Facility (the Amendment), pursuant to which we exercisedformer line of credit facility. In addition, the $70,000,000Revolver includes an accordion feature under the Facility, bringing the maximum availability under the Facility to $200,000,000, and amended the Facility to provide an additional $100,000,000 accordion feature, bringingthat will allow the total potential availability upunder the New Facility to $300,000,000, subjectfurther increase to certain conditions, including, without limitation, obtaining commitments from additional lenders. In addition, the Amendment extended the maturity date of the Facility from August 27, 2019 to September 30, 2020, with a one-year extension option, at our option, subject to$400.0 million, under certain conditions. The $225.0 million Revolver matures in January 2024 with two options to extend for additional six-month periods. Availability under the New Facility is limited to 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The value of the borrowing base properties is determined by applying a capitalization rate to the NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties. Effective, March 22, 2018,Under the New Facility the capitalization rate applied to our NOI generated by our unencumbered, wholly-owned industrial properties was lowered from 7.0%6.5% under the former line of credit facility to 6.5%6.25%, thus increasing the value of the borrowing base properties under the terms of the agreement. BorrowingsNew Facility. In addition, the interest rate for borrowings under the Facility,Revolver was lowered by a range of 5 basis points to 35 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, and will, at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 135 basis points to 205 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at Bank of Montreal’s (BMO) prime lending rate plus 35 basis points to 105 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Currently, our borrowings bear interest under the Revolver at LIBOR plus 145 basis points, which results in an interest rate of 1.53%. As of the fiscal yearend and currently, we have $175.0 million drawn down under our Revolver, resulting in $50.0 million being currently available. Including the accordion feature, we have up to $150.0 million potentially available under the Revolver. As of September 30, 2021, Loans Payable represented $75.0 million outstanding under our Term Loan which matures January 2025 and $175.0 million outstanding under our Revolver which matures in January 2024. The interest rate for borrowings under the Term Loan will at our election, either i) bear interest at LIBOR plus 140130 basis points to 220200 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio, or ii) bear interest at BMO’s prime lending rate plus 4030 basis points to 120100 basis points, depending on our leverage ratio. Based on our leverage ratios as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, our borrowings boreTo reduce floating interest at LIBOR plus 170 basis points, which was atrate exposure under the Term Loan, we also entered into an interest rate of 3.90% and 2.94% as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of September 30, 2018 and 2017, $160,000,000 and $110,000,000, respectively, was drawn down under the Facility. Subsequentswap agreement to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid down $50,000,000fix LIBOR on the Facility which reduced our amount outstanding to $110,000,000.entire $75.0 million for the full duration of the Term Loan resulting in an all-in rate of 2.92%.

13095
Table of Contents

Margin Loans

From time to time we use a margin loan for purchasing securities, for temporary funding of acquisitions, and for working capital purposes. This loan is due on demand and is collateralized by our securities portfolio. We must maintain a coverage ratio of approximately 50%50%. The interest rate charged on the margin loan is the bank’s margin rate and was 2.75% and 2.05% as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.is 0.75%. At September 30, 20182021 and 2017,2020, there was $26,608,676 and $10,091,417 outstanding onwere no amounts drawn down under the margin loan, respectively. Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018, we paid off the margin loan.

For the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2018,2021, 2020 and 2019, amortization of financing costs included in interest expense was $1,220,983, $1,234,259$1.4 million, $1.4 million and $1,116,238,$1.3 million, respectively.

NOTE 8 - OTHER LIABILITIES

Other liabilities consist of the following as of September 30th:30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF OTHER LIABILITIES

 9/30/18 9/30/17  9/30/21  9/30/20 
Rent paid in advance $9,400,909  $9,108,097  $11,760  $10,167 
Unearned reimbursement revenue  5,814,937   3,996,340   7,218   6,208 
Interest Rate Swap, Market Value  2,230   4,368 
Tenant security deposits  715,177   582,170   597   1,326 
Other  495,599   578,911 
Deferred Straight Line Rent  771   972 
Legal & Other Liabilities  8,158   632 
Total $16,426,622  $14,265,518  $30,734  $23,673 

NOTE 9 - STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

At our Annual Meeting held on May 18, 2017, our common shareholders approved our Amended and Restated 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the Plan) which extended the term of our 2007 Incentive Award Plan for an additional 10 years, until March 13, 2027, added 1,600,0001.6 million shares of common stock to the share reserve, expanded the types of awards available for grant under the Plan and made other improvements to the 2007 Plan.

The Compensation Committee, in its capacity as Plan Administrator, shall determine, among other things: the recipients of awards; the type and number of awards participants will receive; the terms, conditions and forms of the awards; the times and conditions subject to which awards may be exercised or become vested, deliverable or exercisable, or as to which any restrictions may apply or lapse; and may amend or modify the terms and conditions of an award, except that repricing of options or Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) is not permitted without shareholder approval.

No participant may receive awards during any calendar year covering more than 200,000 shares of common stock or more than $1,500,000$1.5 million in cash. Regular annual awards granted to non-employee directors as compensation for services as non-employee directors during any fiscal year may not exceed $100,000$100,000 in value on the date of grant, and the grant date value of any special or one-time award upon election or appointment to the Board of Directors may not exceed $200,000.$200,000.

Awards granted pursuant to the Plan generally may not vest until the first anniversary of the date the award was granted, provided, however, that up to 5%5% of the Common Shares available under the Plan may be awarded to any one or more Eligible Individuals without the minimum vesting period.

131
Table of Contents

If an award made under the Plan is forfeited, expires or is converted into shares of another entity in connection with a recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, exchange of shares or other similar event, or the award is settled in cash, the shares associated with the forfeited, expired, converted or settled award will become available for additional awards under the Plan.

96
Table of Contents

The term of any stock option or SAR generally may not be more than 10 years from the date of grant. The exercise price per common share under the Plan generally may not be below 100%100% of the fair market value of a common share at the date of grant.

We account for our stock options and restricted stock in accordance with ASC 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation. ASC 718-10 requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and amortized over the service period (generally equal to the vesting period).

Stock Options

During fiscal 2018,2021, one employee was granted options to purchase 65,000 shares. During fiscal 2017, eleven employees were granted options to purchase 280,000 shares. During fiscal 2016,2020, one employee was granted options to purchase 65,000 shares. During fiscal 2019, thirteen employees were granted options to purchase 450,000 shares. The fair value of these options that were issued during the fiscal years 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 was $119,600, $416,400,$97,000, $81,000, and $48,100.$528,000. The value of these options was determined based on the assumptions below and is being amortized over a one-year vesting period. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, amounts charged to compensation expense related to stock options totaled $167,799, $350,364$93,000, $154,000 and $51,334,$464,000, respectively. The remaining unamortized stock option expense was $29,900$24,000 as of September 30, 20182021 which will be expensed in fiscal 2019.2022.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-averageweighted average assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016:2019:

SCHEDULE OF STOCK OPTIONS, VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS

 2018 2017 2016 
        2021 2020 2019 
Dividend yield  3.82%  4.44%  6.17%  4.37%  4.67%  5.03%
Expected volatility  16.45%  18.84%  20.20%  20.17%  18.40%  17.17%
Risk-free interest rate  2.37%  2.26%  2.09%  0.80%  1.76%  2.88%
Expected lives (years)  8   8   8   8   8   8 
Estimated forfeitures  -0-   -0-   -0-   0   0   0 

A summary of the status of our stock option plan as of September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 is as follows:follows (shares in thousands):

SUMMARY OF STATUS OF COMPANY'S STOCK OPTION PLAN

   2018   2017   2016    2021   2020   2019 
 2018
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 2017
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 2016
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  2021
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 2020
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 2019
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
                          
Outstanding at beginning of year  670,000  $11.75   455,000  $9.46   635,000  $8.68   950  $13.17   1,080  $12.95   695  $12.17 
Granted  65,000   17.80   280,000   14.43   65,000   10.37   65   16.46   65   14.55   450   13.53 
Exercised  (40,000)  14.24   (65,000)  7.22   (245,000)  7.69   (189)  12.57   (95)  10.69   (65)  8.72 
Expired/Forfeited  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   0   0   (100)  13.97   0   0 
Outstanding at end of year  695,000   12.17   670,000   11.75   455,000   9.46   826   13.57   950   13.17   1,080   12.95 
                                                
Exercisable at end of year  630,000       390,000       390,000       761       885       630     
                                                
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year     $1.84      $1.49      $0.74 
Weighted average fair value of                        
options granted during the year     $1.49      $1.24      $1.17 

13297
Table of Contents

The following is a summary of stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2018:2021:

SUMMARY OF STOCK OPTION OUTSTANDING

Date of Grant Number of Grants Number of Shares Option Price Expiration Date  Number of Grants  

Number of Shares

(in thousands)

  Option Price  Expiration Date
        
01/03/11  1   65,000  $8.72  01/03/19
01/03/12  1   65,000   9.33  01/03/20
01/03/13  1   65,000   10.46  01/03/21
01/03/14  1   65,000   8.94  01/03/22   1   65  $8.94  01/03/22
01/05/15  1   65,000   11.16  01/05/23   1   65  $11.16  01/05/23
01/05/16  1   65,000   10.37  01/05/24   1   65  $10.37  01/05/24
12/09/16  8   175,000   14.24  12/09/24   6   113  $14.24  12/09/24
01/04/17  1   65,000   15.04  01/04/25   1   65  $15.04  01/04/25
01/03/18  1   65,000   17.80  01/03/26   1   65  $17.80  01/03/26
12/10/18   8   193  $13.64  12/10/26
01/10/19   1   65  $12.86  01/10/27
01/13/20   1   65  $14.55  01/13/28
01/13/21   1   65  $16.46  01/13/29
     695,000              826       

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 was $3,230,300, $2,974,400$4.2 million, $1.1 million and $2,189,850,$1.8 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised in fiscal years 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 was $141,304, $585,650,$651,000, $381,000, and $884,350,$267,000, respectively. The weighted-averageweighted average remaining contractual term of the above options was 4.3, 5.14.0, 4.5 and 4.25.1 years as of September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

Unrestricted Stock

Effective September 12, 2017, a portion of our quarterly directors’ fee was paid with our unrestricted common stock. During fiscal 2018, 3,6702021, 3,000 unrestricted shares of common stock were granted with a weighted average fair value on the grant date of $16.10$17.52 per share. During fiscal 2017, 8362020, 5,000 unrestricted shares of common stock were granted with a weighted average fair value on the grant date of $15.92$13.44 per share. During fiscal 2019, 5,000 unrestricted shares of common stock were granted with a weighted average fair value on the grant date of $13.58 per share.

Restricted Stock

In October 2017,During fiscal 2021 and 2020, there were 0 shares of restricted stock awarded under our Plan. During fiscal 2019, we awarded 12,50025,000 shares of restricted stock to one participant under our Plan. In September 2017, we awarded 11,000 shares of restricted stock to eleven participants under our Plan. In September 2016, we awarded 40,000 shares of restricted stock to one participant under our Plan. The grant date fair value of restricted stock grants awarded to participants was $205,875, $175,120$0, $0 and $545,600$386,000 in fiscal 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. These grants vest in equal installments over five years.years. As of September 30, 2018,2021, there remained a total of $484,543$234,000 of unrecognized restricted stock compensation related to outstanding non-vested restricted stock grants awarded under the Plan and outstanding at that date. Restricted stock compensation is expected to be expensed over a remaining weighted average period of 3.11.8 years. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, amounts charged to compensation expense related to restricted stock grants totaled $207,008, $261,033$147,000, $235,000 and $875,131,$258,000, respectively.

13398
Table of Contents

A summary of the status of our non-vested restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 are presented below:below (shares in thousands):

SUMMARY OF NONVESTED RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

   2018   2017   2016    2021   2020   2019 
 2018
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 2017
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 2016
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  2021
Shares
 Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 2020
Shares
 Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 2019
Shares
 Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
                          
Non-vested at beginning of year  89,714  $12.15   117,897  $11.35   123,496  $10.08   46  $15.02   77  $13.94   78  $13.18 
Granted  12,500   16.47   11,000   15.92   40,000   13.64   0   0   0   0   25   15.45 
Dividend Reinvested Shares  4,406   15.42   5,103   13.99   6,771   11.08   1   18.14   4   12.89   5   13.11 
Vested  (29,084)  (16.99)  (44,286)  (15.74)  (49,136)  (10.06)  (21)  (17.01)  (35)  (14.37)  (31)  (14.33)
Forfeited  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   (3,234)  (11.38)  0   0   0   0   0   0 
Non-vested at end of year  77,536  $13.18   89,714  $12.15   117,897  $11.35   26  $15.54   46  $15.02   77  $13.94 

As of September 30, 2018,2021, there were 1,671,8721.2 million shares available for grant under the Plan.

NOTE 10 - INCOME FROM LEASES

We derive income primarily from operating leases on our commercial properties. At September 30, 2021, we held investments in 122 properties totaling 24.9 million square feet with an overall occupancy rate of 99.7%. In general, these leases are written for periods up to 10 years or more with various provisions for renewal. These leases generally contain clauses for reimbursement (or direct payment) of real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses of the properties. As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had a weighted average lease maturity of 8.17.0 years and our average annualized rent per occupied square foot was $6.01.$6.61. Our weighted average lease expiration has been 7.0 years or greater for over seven consecutive years. Our overall occupancy rate has been 98.9% or above for over six consecutive years. Approximate minimum base rents due under non-cancellable leases as of September 30, 20182021 are scheduled as follows:follows (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF FUTURE MINIMUM RENTAL PAYMENTS FOR OPERATING LEASES

Fiscal Year Amount  Amount 
2019 $122,292,000 
2020 120,007,000 
2021 118,094,000 
2022 111,474,000  $157,646 
2023 106,679,000   152,056 
2024  140,646 
2025  129,437 
2026  118,354 
thereafter  499,883,000   581,268 
Total $1,078,429,000  $1,279,407 

NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

FiveFour of our 13 directors are also directors and shareholders of UMH. We holdAs of September 30, 2021, we held common and preferred stock of UMH in our securities portfolio. See Note 6 for current holdings. During fiscal 2018,2021, we made total purchases of 59,90553,000 common shares of UMH for a total cost of $828,787,$1.0 million, or a weighted average cost of $13.84$19.11 per share, which were purchased through UMH’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. We owned a total of 1.4 million shares of UMH’s common stock as of September 30, 2021 at a total cost of $14.9 million and a fair value of $31.6 million representing 2.8% of the outstanding common shares of UMH. The unrealized gain on our investment in UMH’s common stock as of September 30, 2021 was $16.7 million. During fiscal 2018,2021, UMH made total purchases of 101,30413,000 of our common shares through our DRIP for a total cost of $1,566,624,$205,000, or a weighted average cost of $15.46$15.68 per share.

As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had fourteen14 full-time employees and one part-time employee.employees. Our Chairman of the Board is also the Chairman of the Board of UMH. Other than our Chairman of the Board, we do not share any employees with UMH.

Effective January 12, 2015, we entered into a seven-year lease agreement to occupy 5,680 square feet for our current corporate office space. Rent for our current corporate office space is at an annual rate of $99,400 or $17.50 per square foot for years one through five and an annual rate of $100,820 or $17.75 per square foot for years six and seven. We are also responsible for our proportionate share of real estate taxes and common area maintenance. Mr. Eugene W. Landy, the Founder and Chairman of the Board, owns a 24% interest in the entity that is the landlord of the property where our corporate office space is located. We believe that the aforesaid rent is no more than what we would pay for comparable space elsewhere.

13499
Table of Contents

Daniel D. Cronheim is one of our directors and is also an Executive Vice President of David Cronheim Company (Cronheim) and Cronheim Management Services, Inc. (CMSI). Daniel Cronheim received $73,323, $75,880 and $49,500 for director’s fees in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We have not paid any fees to The David Cronheim Mortgage Corporation, an affiliated company of CMSI, over the last three fiscal years.

NOTE 12 - TAXES

Income Tax

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Code under Sections 856 to 860 and the comparable New Jersey Statutes. Under such provisions, we will not be taxed on that portion of our taxable income distributed currently to shareholders, provided that at least 90%90% of our taxable income is distributed. As we have and intend to continue to distribute all of our income, currently no provision has been made for income taxes. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to federal, state, and local income taxes.

Federal Excise Tax

We do not have a Federal excise tax liability for the calendar years 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, since we intend to or have distributed all of our annual Federal taxable net income.

Reconciliation Between U.S. GAAP Net Income and Taxable Income

The following table reconciles Net Income (Loss) Attributable to common shares to taxable income for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016:2019 (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF NET INCOME AND TAXABLE INCOME

 2018
Estimated
(unaudited)
 2017
Actual
 2016
Actual
  2021
Estimated
(unaudited)
 2020
Actual
 2019
Actual
 

Net income attributable to common shareholders

 $38,815,344  $22,942,234  $20,531,888 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders $44,764  $(48,617) $11,026 
Book / tax difference on gains realized from capital transactions  (7,596,653)  (2,311,714)  (4,398,599)  5,237   0   0 
Stock compensation expense  433,895   624,706   926,465   287   452   784 
Deferred compensation  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Unrealized Holding (Gain)/Loss Arising During the Period  (50,239)  77,380   24,680 
Other book / tax differences, net  (1,038,925)  (1,596,068)  1,298,104   31,753   (3,149)  (4,441)
Taxable income before adjustments  30,613,661   19,659,158   18,357,858   31,802   26,066   32,049 
Add: capital gains  7,996,653   566,903   3,643,569 
Add: Capital gains (losses)  0   0   0 
Estimated taxable income subject to 90% dividend requirement $38,610,314  $20,226,061  $22,001,427  $31,802  $26,066  $32,049 

Reconciliation Between Cash Dividends Paid and Dividends Paid Deduction

The following table reconciles cash dividends paid with the dividends paid deduction for the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016:2019 (in thousands):

SCHEDULE OF CASH DIVIDENDS PAID AND DIVIDENDS PAID DEDUCTION

 2018      2021  2020 2019  
 Estimated
(unaudited)
 2017
Actual
 2016
Actual
  Estimated
(unaudited)
 2020
Actual
 2019
Actual
 
Cash dividends paid $53,586,063  $46,289,248  $42,034,183  $69,754  $66,438  $63,742 
Less: Portion designated capital gains distribution  (7,996,653)  (566,903)  (3,643,569)
Less: Return of capital  (14,975,748)  (7,361,734)  (7,828,595)  (4,533)  (14,533)  (51,406)
Estimated dividends paid deduction $30,613,662  $38,360,611  $30,562,019  $65,221  $51,905  $12,336 

NOTE 13 - SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Our authorized stock as of September 30, 2021 consisted of 300.0 million shares of common stock, of which 98.3 million shares were issued and outstanding, 26.6 million authorized shares of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, of which 22.0 million shares were issued and outstanding, and 200.0 million authorized shares of Excess Stock, $0.01 par value per share, of which NaN were issued or outstanding.

135100
Table of Contents

NOTE 13 - SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

We have implemented a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the DRIP) effective December 15, 1987. Under the terms of the DRIP, as subsequently amended, shareholders who participate may reinvest all or part of their dividends in additional shares at a discounted price (approximately 95%95% of market value) directly from us, from authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. Shareholders may also purchase additional shares through the DRIP by making optional cash payments monthly. In January 2021, when our Board of Directors unanimously decided to explore strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value, the Board also determined to temporarily suspend our DRIP program during this process. Because the exploration of strategic alternative process is still ongoing, the DRIP program remains suspended.

Amounts received in connection with the DRIP and shares issued in connection with the DRIP for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 were as follows:

SCHEDULE OF SHARES ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 2019 
       
Amounts received $90,028,789  $91,931,831  $72,175,797 
Amounts received (1) $1,361  $26,411  $73,965 
Less: Dividend reinvestments  12,928,356   10,125,894   8,369,146   1,041   7,596   16,886 
Amounts received, net $77,100,433  $81,805,937  $63,806,651  $320  $18,815  $57,079 
                        
Number of Shares Issued  5,816,443   6,632,713   6,515,750   88   1,956   5,601 

(1)Optional cash payments must be not less than $500 per payment nor more than $1,000 unless a request for a waiver has been accepted by us. We have not granted any waivers since March 2020 and the DRIP program has been temporarily suspended since January 2021.

The following cash distributions were paid to common shareholders during the years ended September 30, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016:2019 (in thousands):

SUMMARY OF CASH DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 2018 2017 2016  2021 2020 2019 
Quarter Ended Amount Per Share Amount Per Share Amount Per Share  Amount Per Share Amount Per Share Amount Per Share 
December 31 $13,016,721  $0.17  $11,184,399  $0.16  $10,083,160  $0.16  $16,672  $0.17  $16,486  $0.17  $15,570  $0.17 
March 31 13,302,878   0.17   11,428,917   0.16   10,384,295   0.16   17,694   0.18   16,654   0.17   15,825   0.17 
June 30 13,522,569   0.17   11,697,727   0.16   10,647,332   0.16   17,694   0.18   16,641   0.17   16,064   0.17 
September 30  13,743,895   0.17   11,978,205   0.16   10,919,396   0.16   17,694   0.18   16,657   0.17   16,283   0.17 
 $53,586,063  $0.68  $46,289,248  $0.64  $42,034,183  $0.64  $69,754  $0.71  $66,438  $0.68  $63,742  $0.68 

On October 1, 2015,January 14, 2021, our Board of Directors approved a 6.7%5.9% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.16$0.18 per share from $0.15$0.17 per share. This representedshare representing an annualized dividend rate of $0.64 per share. On October 2, 2017, our Board of Directors approved a 6.3% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend, raising it to $0.17 per share from $0.16$0.72 per share. This represents an annualizedincrease was the third dividend rate of $0.68 per share. These two dividend raises representincrease in the past five years, representing a total increase of 13%20%. We have maintained or increased our common stock cash dividend for 2730 consecutive years. We are one of the few REITs that maintained our dividend throughout the Global Financial Crisis. On October 1, 2018,2021, our Board of Directors approveddeclared a cash dividend of $0.17$0.18 per share to be paid on December 17, 2018,15, 2021 to common shareholders of record atas of the close of business on November 15, 2018. This represents2021.

On February 6, 2020, we entered into an annualized dividend rate of $0.68 per share.

Subsequent to fiscal year end, in October 2018,Equity Distribution Agreement (Common Stock ATM Program) with BMO Capital Markets Corp., B. Riley Securities, Inc. (formerly B. Riley FBR, Inc.), D.A. Davidson & Co., Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and RBC Capital Markets, LLC (together the “Distribution Agents”) under which we completed a public offering of 9,200,000may offer and sell shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs, of approximately $132,339,000.

Preferred Stock

7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

On September 14, 2016, we announced that we intended to redeem all 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of our 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01common stock, $0.01 par value per share, (7.625% Series A Preferred Stock). We redeemed allhaving an aggregate sales price of up to $150.0 million from time to time through the Distribution Agents. Sales of the 7.625% Series A Preferredshares of Common Stock on October 14, 2016 at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all dividends accrued and unpaid to and includingunder the redemption date,Agreement, if any, will be in an amount equal to $0.23299 per share. As of September 30, 2016,“at the outstanding 7.625% Series A Preferredmarket offerings.” We implemented the Common Stock was reclassified out of stockholder’s equity and was reflected as a liability at redemption value and we recognized a deemed dividend of $2,942,149 on the Consolidated Statement of IncomeATM program for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, which representsflexibility that it provides to opportunistically access the difference between redemption valuecapital markets and carrying value net of original deferred issuance costs.to best time our equity capital needs as we close on acquisitions. To date, we have not raised any equity though our Common Stock Equity Program and it has since expired.

136101
Table of Contents

Prior to its redemption, the annual dividendRepurchase of the 7.625% Series A PreferredCommon Stock was $1.90625 per share, or 7.625%, of the $25.00 per share liquidation value and was payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15.

OurOn January 16, 2019, our Board of Directors has authorized a $40.0 million increase to our previously announced $10.0 million Common Stock Repurchase Program (the “Program”), bringing the total available under the Program to $50.0 million. The timing, manner, price and weamount of any repurchase will be determined by us at our discretion and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The Program does not have paida termination date and may be suspended or discontinued at our discretion without prior notice. On September 14, 2021, our Board of Directors reaffirmed the following dividends on the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

Declaration

Date

  

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
(1)9/14/16 10/14/16 10/14/16 $498,540  $0.23299 

(1)Represents final dividend payment at timeProgram that authorizes us to purchase up to $50.0 million of redemption of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock

Declaration

Date

 

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
10/1/15 11/16/15 12/15/15 $1,019,725  $0.4765625 
1/19/16 2/16/16 3/15/16  1,019,726   0.4765625 
4/5/16 5/16/16 6/15/16  1,019,725   0.4765625 
7/1/16 8/15/16 9/15/16  1,019,726   0.4765625 
      $4,078,902  $1.9062500 

7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

On May 5, 2017, we announced that we intended to redeem all 2,300,000 issued and outstanding shares of our 7.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (7.875% Series B Preferred Stock). We redeemed all ofcommon stock. Under the outstandingProgram, during fiscal 2020, we repurchased 400,000 shares of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock on June 7, 2017,our common stock for $4.3 million at a redemptionan average price of $25.00$10.69 per share, totaling $57,500,000, plus accumulatedshare. These were the only repurchases made under the Program to date and unpaid dividends forwe may elect not to repurchase any additional common stock in the period from June 1, 2017 up to and not including,future. The remaining maximum dollar value that may be purchased under the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.0328125, totaling $75,469, for a total cash paymentRepurchase Program as of $25.0328125 per share, totaling $57,575,469. We recognized a deemed dividend of $2,467,165 on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, which represents the difference between redemption value and carrying value net of original deferred issuance costs.2021 is $45.7 million.

Prior to its redemption, the annual dividend of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock was $1.96875 per share, or 7.875%, of the $25.00 per share liquidation value and was payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15.

Our Board of Directors has authorized and we have paid the following dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

Declaration

Date

  

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
 10/3/16  11/15/16 12/15/16 $1,132,032  $0.4921875 
 1/17/17  2/15/17 3/15/17  1,132,033   0.4921875 
 4/4/17  5/15/17 6/15/17  1,132,032   0.4921875 
(1)5/5/17 6/7/17 6/7/17  75,470   0.0328125 
        $3,471,567  $1.5093750 

(1)Represents final dividend payment at time of redemption of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
10/1/15 11/16/15 12/15/15 $1,132,032  $0.4921875 
1/19/16 2/16/16 3/15/16  1,132,033   0.4921875 
4/5/16 5/16/16 6/15/16  1,132,032   0.4921875 
7/1/16 8/15/16 9/15/16  1,132,033   0.4921875 
      $4,528,130  $1.9687500 

137
Table of Contents

6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

OnAs of September 13, 2016, we issued 5,400,00030, 2021, 22.0 million shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock were outstanding representing a liquidation preference of $549.6 million.

At-the-Market Sales Agreement Program for our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock $0.01 par value per share (6.125% Series C Preferred Stock), at an offering price of $25.00 per share in an underwritten public offering. We received net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses, of approximately $130,543,000. On September 15, 2016, we used $45,000,000 of such net proceeds from the offering to reduce the amounts outstanding under our Facility and on October 14, 2016, and as discussed above, we used $53,493,750 of such net proceeds from the offering to redeem all of the 2,139,750 issued and outstanding shares of our 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, on October 14, 2016, we used $498,540 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, up to and including the redemption date of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock.

On March 9, 2017, we issued an additional 3,000,000 shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, at a public offering price of $24.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $73,500,000 before deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses. Net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses were approximately $71,003,000. As discussed above, we used the net proceeds from this offering to redeem all of the outstanding shares of our 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, we used $75,469 of such net proceeds from the offering to pay all dividends, accrued and unpaid, up to and not including the redemption date of the 7.875% Series B Preferred Stock.

On June 29, 2017, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program with B. Riley FBR, Inc., or B. Riley (formerly FBR Capital Markets & Co.), that provided for the offer and sale of shares of our 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, or our 6.125% Series C preferred stock, having an aggregate sales price of up to $100,000,000. $100.0 million.

On August 2, 2018, we replaced this program with a new Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125,000,000$125.0 million of our 6.125%6.125% Series C preferred stock. Preferred Stock, representing an additional $96.5 million, with $28.5 million being carried over from the Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program entered into on June 29, 2017.

On December 4, 2019, we replaced the Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program entered into on August 2, 2018 with another Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program that provides for the offer and sale from time to time of $125.0 million of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, representing an additional $101.0 million, with $24.0 million being carried over from the Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program entered into on August 2, 2018.

On November 25, 2020, we entered into a Preferred Stock At-The-Market Sales Agreement Program (Preferred Stock ATM Program) with B. Riley FBR., or B. Riley, providing for the offer and sale from time to time of up to $150.0 million of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, which replaced a previous Preferred Stock ATM Program entered into on December 4, 2019 (which itself had replaced an earlier Preferred Stock ATM Program).

Sales of shares of our 6.125%6.125% Series C preferred stockPreferred Stock under theour Preferred Stock ATM Program are in “at the market offerings” as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act, including, without limitation, sales made directly on or through the NYSE, or on any other existing trading market for the 6.125% Series C preferred stockPreferred Stock, or to or through a market maker, or any other method permitted by law, including, without limitation, negotiated transactions and block trades. We began selling shares through the first of these programs on July 3, 2017. Since inception through September 30, 2018,2021, we sold 3,088,00113.6 million shares of our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock under these programs at a weighted average price of $25.06$24.91 per share, and generated net proceeds, after offering expenses, of approximately $75,828,000,$332.4 million, of which 1,648,5563.1 million shares were sold during the 2021 fiscal year ended 2018 at a weighted average price of $24.84$24.88 per share, and generatedgenerating net proceeds after offering expenses of approximately $40,094,000. As of September 30, 2018, there is approximately $119,096,000 remaining that may be$76.0 million. No shares were sold under the Preferred Stock ATM Program.

As of September 30, 2018, 11,488,001 shares of the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

We have been and we intendpursuant to continue to use the proceeds raised through the Preferred Stock ATM Program to purchase properties and fund expansions of our existing properties in the ordinary course of business and for general corporate purposes.since December 31, 2020. Our Preferred Stock ATM Program has since expired.

138
Table of Contents

Our Board of Directors has authorized and we have paid the following dividends on our 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019 (in thousands except per share amounts):

Declaration

Date

 

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
10/2/17 11/15/17 12/15/17 $4,080,685  $0.3828125 
1/16/18 2/15/18 3/15/18  4,220,657   0.3828125 
4/2/18 5/15/18 6/15/18  4,247,507   0.3828125 
7/2/18 8/15/18 9/17/18  4,327,683   0.3828125 
      $16,876,532  $1.53125 

Declaration

Date

 

Record

Date

 

Payment

Date

 

 

Dividend

  

Dividend

per Share

 
10/3/16 11/15/16 12/15/16 $1,791,563  $0.3317708 
1/17/17 2/15/17 3/15/17  2,067,190   0.3828125 
4/4/17 5/15/17 6/15/17  3,215,629   0.3828125 
7/3/17 8/15/17 9/15/17  3,455,985   0.3828125 
      $10,530,367  $1.4802083 

SCHEDULE OF DIVIDEND DECLARED AND PAID ON SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
10/1/20 11/16/20 12/15/20 $7,775  $0.3828125 
1/14/21 2/16/21 3/15/21  8,416   0.3828125 
4/1/21 5/17/21 6/15/21  8,416   0.3828125 
7/1/21 8/16/21 8/31/21  8,416   0.3828125 
      $33,023  $1.53125 

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
10/1/19 11/15/19 12/16/19 $5,873  $0.3828125 
1/16/20 2/18/20 3/16/20  6,572   0.3828125 
4/1/20 5/15/20 6/15/20  6,583   0.3828125 
7/1/20 8/17/20 9/15/20  6,811   0.3828125 
      $25,839  $1.53125 

Declaration
Date
 Record
Date
 Payment
Date
 Dividend  Dividend
per Share
 
10/1/18 11/15/18 12/17/18 $4,415  $0.3828125 
1/16/19 2/15/19 3/15/19  4,424   0.3828125 
4/2/19 5/15/19 6/17/19  4,681   0.3828125 
7/1/19 8/15/19 9/16/19  4,945   0.3828125 
      $18,465  $1.53125 

The annual dividend of the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock is $1.53125$1.53125 per share, or 6.125% of the $25.00$25.00 per share liquidation value and is payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15. The 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity and will remain outstanding indefinitely unless redeemed or otherwise repurchased. Except in limited circumstances relating to our qualification as a REIT, and as described below,Currently, the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock is not redeemable prior to September 15, 2021. On and after September 15, 2021, at any time and, from time to time, the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock will be redeemable in whole, or in part, at our option, at a cash redemption price of $25.00$25.00 per share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to the date of redemption.

Upon the occurrence of a Delisting Event, as defined in the Articles Supplementary (Series C Articles Supplementary) classifying and designating the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, we may, at our option and subject to certain conditions, redeem the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, within 90 days after the Delisting Event, for a cash redemption price per share of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock equal to $25.00 plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not declared), to, but not including, the redemption date.date.

Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, as defined in the Series C Articles Supplementary, we may, at our option and subject to certain conditions, redeem the 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, within 120 days after the first date on which such Change of Control occurred, for a cash redemption price per share of 6.125% Series C Preferred Stock equal to $25.00 plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not declared) to, but not including, the redemption date.date.

On October 1, 2018,2021, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend for the period September 1, 20182021 through November 30, 2018,2021, of $0.3828125$0.3828125 per share to be paid December 17, 201815, 2021 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 15, 2018.2021.

Repurchase of Stock

On January 16, 2018, the Board of Directors reaffirmed our Share Repurchase Program (Repurchase Program) that authorizes us to purchase up to $10,000,000 in the aggregate of our common stock. The Repurchase Program was originally created on March 3, 2009 and is intended to be implemented through purchases made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or block trades, or by any combination of such methods, in accordance with applicable insider trading and other securities laws and regulations. The size, scope and timing of any purchases will be based on business, market and other conditions and factors, including price, regulatory and contractual requirements or consents, and capital availability. The Repurchase Program does not require us to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the program may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time at our discretion without prior notice. We did not reacquire any of our shares of Common Stock during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, nor do we possess any reacquired shares of Common Stock as of September 30, 2018. The maximum dollar value that may be purchased under the Repurchase Program as of September 30, 2018 is $10,000,000.

139102
Table of Contents

NOTE 14 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We follow ASC 825, Financial Instruments, for financial assets and liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis. We measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, including securities available for sale.sale and an interest rate swap agreement. Our financial assets consist mainly of marketable REIT securities. The fair value of these certain financial assets was determined using the following inputs at September 30, 20182021 and 2017:2020 (in thousands):

SUMMARY OF FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS

 Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
 Total 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

  Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
September 30, 2018:                
September 30, 2021:                
Securities available for sale $154,920,545  $154,920,545  $-0-  $-0-  $143,505  $143,505  $0  $0 
September 30, 2017:                
Interest Rate Swap  (2,230)  0   (2,230)  0 
Total $141,275  $143,505  $(2,230) $0 
                
September 30, 2020:                
Securities available for sale $123,764,770  $123,764,770  $-0-  $-0-  $108,832  $108,832  $0  $0 
Interest Rate Swap  (4,368)  0   (4,368)  0 
Total $104,464  $108,832  $(4,368) $0 

In addition to our investments in Securities Available for Sale at Fair Value and our interest rate swap agreement, we are required to disclose certain information about fair values of our other financial instruments. Estimates of fair value are made at a specific point in time based upon, where available, relevant market prices and information about the financial instrument. Such estimates do not include any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time our entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. For a portion of our other financial instruments, no quoted market value exists. Therefore, estimates of fair value are necessarily based on a number of significant assumptions (many of which involve events outside of our control). Such assumptions include assessments of current economic conditions, perceived risks associated with these financial instruments and their counterparties; future expected loss experience and other factors. Given the uncertainties surrounding these assumptions, the reported fair values represent estimates only, and therefore cannot be compared to the historical accounting model. The use of different assumptions or methodologies is likely to result in significantly different fair value estimates.

The fair value of Cash and Cash Equivalents approximates their current carrying amounts since all such items are short-term in nature. The fair value of variable rate Loans Payable approximates their current carrying amounts since such amounts payable are at approximately a weighted-averageweighted average current market rate of interest. The estimated fair value of fixed rate mortgage notes payable is based on discounting the future cash flows at a year-end risk adjusted borrowing rate currently available to us for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. These fair value measurements fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At September 30, 2018,2021, the fixed rate Mortgage Notes Payable fair value (estimated based upon expected cash outflows discounted at current market rates) amounted to $706,745,000$885.9 million and the carrying value amounted to $719,768,355.$839.6 million. When we acquired a property, prior to April 1, 2017, that was accounted for as a business combination, it was required towe allocate purchase price based upon relative fair value of all of the assets and liabilities, including intangible assets and liabilities, relating to the properties acquired lease (See Note 3). Those fair value measurements were estimated based on independent third-party appraisals and fell within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

103
Table of Contents

NOTE 15 - CASH FLOW

During fiscal years 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, we paid cash for interest of $31,335,763, $24,290,811$36.4 million, $35.0 million and $21,967,741,$35.9 million, respectively.

During fiscal years 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, we had $12,928,356, $10,125,894$1.0 million, $7.6 million and $8,369,146,$16.9 million, respectively, of dividends which were reinvested that required no cash transfers.

140
Table of Contents

NOTE 16 – CONTINGENCIES, COMMITMENTS AND LEGAL MATTERS

From time to time, we can be subject to claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that any such claim or litigation will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.

In addition to the $30.2 million property purchased subsequent to our fiscal yearend,in October 2021, as described below in Note 17,18, we have entered into agreements to purchase twothree, new build-to-suit, industrial buildings that are currently being developed in Alabama, Georgia and North Carolina, consisting of approximately 398,000Texas, totaling 1.1 million square feet, withfeet. These future acquisitions have net-leased terms ranging from 10 to 15 years with a weighted average lease term of 13.4 12.6 years. The total purchase price for these three properties is approximately $68,747,000$126.8 million. All three properties are leased to companies, or subsidiaries of companies, that are considered Investment Grade by S&P Global Ratings (www.standardandpoors.com) and bothby Moody’s (www.moodys.com). Two of these three properties, consisting of an aggregate of 563,000 square feet, or 52% of the total leasable area, are leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Subject to satisfactory due diligence and other customary closing conditions and requirements, we anticipate closing all three of these transactions during fiscal 2022.

We have several FedEx Ground parking expansion projects in progress with more under discussion. Currently there are nine parking expansion projects underway, which we expect to cost approximately $42.6 million. These parking expansion projects will enable us to capture additional rent while lengthening the first quarterterms of fiscalthese leases. We are also in discussions to expand the parking at eight additional locations bringing the total recently completed and likely future parking lot expansion projects to 18 currently.

Our headquarters is located within the Bell Works complex in Holmdel, NJ and comprises 13,000 square feet of office space and is leased for 10.3 years through December 2029 with two, five-year extension options at fair market rent, as defined in the lease agreement. Initial annual rent when the lease commenced in September 2019 was at a rate of $410,000 or $31.00 per square foot, with 2% annual escalations. The base rent includes our proportionate share of real estate taxes and fiscal 2020.common area maintenance and we are responsible for increases in real estate taxes and common area maintenance above our 2019 base year actual amounts. In addition, we received four months of free rent and a tenant improvement allowance of $48.00 per square foot.

We and the members of our Board of Directors are defendants in a class action lawsuit that was commenced in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland in August 2021, prior to termination of our merger agreement with EQC, and which currently remains pending. The lawsuit alleges that our directors violated their legal duties in connection with onethe proposed EQC merger and seeks injunctive relief and damages. We believe that the claims asserted in this lawsuit are without merit and that in any event the claims are now moot in light of these properties,the termination of the merger agreement. We intend to seek to have this lawsuit dismissed. However, litigation is inherently uncertain and there can be no assurance we will be successful in obtaining a dismissal. Four other lawsuits that had been brought with respect to the proposed merger with EQC after the transaction was announced have since been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs in light of the termination of the EQC merger agreement.

In January 2021, we commenced legal proceedings in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Monmouth County, against our former general counsel, Allison Nagelberg, and Blackwells alleging that Ms. Nagelberg was in violation of her obligations owed to us as our former general counsel as a result of, among other things, having agreed to be a nominee of Blackwells for election to our Board of Directors at our 2021 annual meeting. The complaint also alleged that Blackwells wrongfully induced Ms. Nagelberg’s wrongful actions. Ms. Nagelberg filed counterclaims against us seeking indemnification and advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of her agreements with us and our charter and bylaws. Subsequent to September 30, 2021, we entered into a commitment to obtain a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $17,500,000Release and Settlement Agreement with a fixed interest rate of 4.40%.Blackwells and Ms. Nagelberg resolving the claims asserted in these proceedings and other matters, as described in Note 18.

We currently have one 154,800 square foot property expansion in progress at our property located in Monroe, OH which is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2019 for a total project cost of approximately $9,072,000. The expansion will result in a new 15 year lease which will extend the prior lease expiration date from February 2030 to January 2034. In addition, the expansion will result in an increase in initial annual rent effective from the date of completion by approximately $862,000 from approximately $961,000, or $4.14 per square foot, to approximately $1,823,000, or $4.71 per square foot. In addition, the annual rent will increase 2% per annum.

104
Table of Contents

NOTE 17 – TERMINATED MERGER AGREEMENT WITH EQUITY COMMONWEALTH, REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES AND RELATED MATTERS

On May 4, 2021, following a comprehensive review and analysis by our Board of Directors of our strategic alternatives, which included consideration of proposals from several third parties that expressed interest in acquiring us, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “EQC Merger Agreement��) with Equity Commonwealth (“EQC”) and EQC Maple Industrial LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of EQC, which provided that, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the EQC Merger Agreement, we would merge with and into EQC Industrial LLC and become a wholly owned subsidiary of EQC. The terms of the EQC Merger Agreement as originally executed on May 4, 2021 provided that, upon consummation of the merger, our common stockholders would receive 0.67 EQC common shares for each outstanding share of our common stock. On August 15, 2021, the EQC Merger Agreement was amended (the “Amended EQC Merger Agreement”) to provide that, upon consummation of the merger, our common stockholders would have the right to elect to receive, for each common share, either $19.00 in cash or 0.713 EQC common shares, subject to certain caps and prorations set forth in the Amended EQC Merger Agreement. Both the original EQC Merger Agreement and the Amended EQC Merger Agreement provided that the proposed merger would be subject to customary closing conditions, including, among others, approval of the proposed merger by the holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding common shares, as required by Maryland law and our charter.

On August 31, 2021, we held a special meeting of common stockholders to vote on the proposed merger with EQC, and at the special meeting the proposed merger did not receive approval by the requisite two-thirds of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Following the special meeting, EQC notified us on August 31, 2021 that EQC was terminating the Amended EQC Merger Agreement as a result of our failure to obtain the required stockholder approval. As required by the Merger Agreement, we subsequently reimbursed EQC for approximately $10.0 million of expenses incurred by EQC in connection with the proposed merger.

Pending litigation relating to the now terminated merger agreement with EQC is described in Note 16 and under Part I, Item 3 – Legal Proceedings.

Following termination of the Amended EQC Merger Agreement, on September 13, 2021, we announced that our Board of Directors would be re-initiating its exploration of strategic alternatives and expected to consider a wide range of potential strategic and financial alternatives, including a potential sale or merger, joint ventures and changes in our capital structure, in an expeditious process. This re-instituted strategic alternatives review process resulted in our execution of a Merger Agreement with Industrial Logistics Properties Trust on November 5, 2021, as described in Note 18.

105
Table of Contents

NOTE 18 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Material subsequent events have been evaluated and are disclosed herein.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, inOn October 2018, we completed1, 2021, our Board of Directors declared a public offeringdividend of 9,200,000 shares of our Common Stock (including the underwriters’ option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares) at a price of $15.00 $0.18 per share before underwriting discounts. We received net proceeds fromto be paid December 15, 2021to common shareholders of record as of the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and all other transaction costs,close of approximately $132,339,000.business on November 15, 2021. In addition, on October 1, 2021, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.3828125 per share to be paid December 15, 2021to the 6.125% Series C Preferred shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 15, 2021.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 19, 2018,27, 2021, we purchased a newly constructed 347,145291,000 square foot industrial building, situated on 62.046.0 acres, located in Trenton, NJ.the Birmingham, AL MSA. The building is 100%100% net-leased to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. for 15 years through June 2032.July 2036. The purchase price was $85,248,352.$30.2 million. We obtained a mortgage loan commitment for a 15 year, fully-amortizing mortgage loan of $55,000,000$19.3 million at a fixed interest rate of 4.13%.2.40%, which has not yet closed. Annual rental revenue over the remaining term of the lease averages approximately $5,328,000.$1.7 million.

The industrial property purchased thus far during fiscal 2019 increased our current total leasable square feet to approximately 21,521,000.

Subsequent to fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018,November 1, 2021, we paid down $50,000,000fully prepaid a $7.3 million mortgage loan for our property located in Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH. The loan had an interest rate of 5.5%.

On November 5, 2021, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Industrial Logistics Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“ILPT”), under which, on the Facility which reducedterms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, ILPT agreed to acquire us in an all-cash transaction, with our common stockholders receiving $21.00 in cash for each outstanding share of our common stock. ILPT’s acquisition of us is subject to obtaining the requisite approval of our common stockholders and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Upon closing of the merger with ILPT, holders of our outstanding 6.125% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”) will receive the amount outstanding to $110,000,000.of $25 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.

 

SubsequentOn November 4, 2021, we entered into a Release and Settlement Agreement with our former general counsel, Allison Nagelberg, and Blackwells Capital LLC (“Blackwells”) resolving legal proceedings that we had commenced against Ms. Nagelberg and Blackwells in the Superior Court of New Jersey relating to, fiscal yearend, on October 9, 2018,among other things, Ms. Nagelberg having been named as a nominee of Blackwells for election to our Board of Directors at our 2021 annual meeting, and also resolving Ms. Nagelberg’s counterclaim against us seeking indemnification and advancement of expenses. In connection with the settlement, the parties exchanged mutual releases, whereby, among other things, Blackwells agreed to release claims, including those it had previously demanded that we paid offassert against the margin loan.members of our Board for alleged breach of their legal duties relating to the Board’s rejection of an unsolicited acquisition offer that we received from Blackwells in December 2020 and subsequent actions taken by the Board in connection with its review of strategic alternatives earlier this year.

 

141
Table of Contents

Simultaneous with the Release and Settlement Agreement, we and Blackwells entered into a Cooperation Agreement that, among other things, resolved a potential proxy contest to elect directors at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Under the Cooperation Agreement, Blackwells also agreed, among other things, to withdraw its slate of proposed nominees and various shareholder proposals for consideration at the 2021 Annual Meeting and committed to vote all its shares of our common stock at the 2021 Annual Meeting in favor of all of the Board’s director nominees and in support of all Board-recommended proposals, including voting in favor of the Merger Agreement with ILPT. Blackwells also agreed to comply with certain additional standstill, voting and affirmative solicitation commitments and terms.

 

The estimated costs associated with the Release and Settlement Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement and the related litigation and potential litigation have been reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 1819SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following is the Unaudited Selected Quarterly Financial Data:

SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

THREE MONTHS ENDED (in thousands)

SCHEDULE OF SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

FISCAL 2021 12/31/20  3/31/21  6/30/21  9/30/21 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $43,583  $46,365  $45,993  $46,815 
Total Expenses  22,159   25,620   32,040   49,300 
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Periods  19,721   19,186   16,471   (5,139)
Other Income (Expense)  12,169   13,634   14,648   (13,286)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders  33,916   34,329   25,709   (15,771)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders per diluted share $0.34  $0.35  $0.26  $(0.16)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders  25,746   25,913   17,292   (24,187)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.26  $0.26  $0.17  $(0.25)

 

FISCAL 2018 12/31/17  3/31/18  6/30/18  9/30/18 
             
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $32,741,822  $33,621,508  $36,197,825  $36,600,694 
Lease Termination Income  210,261   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total Expenses  16,267,991   16,920,664   19,073,092   19,471,976 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,441,577)  (5,055,841)  (4,651,340)  (4,969,095)
Income from Continuing Operations  12,242,515   11,645,003   12,473,393   12,159,623 
Income from Continuing Operations per diluted share $0.16  $0.15  $0.16  $0.15 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Investment  5,387,886   -0-   2,097,380   -0- 
Net Income  17,630,401   11,645,003   14,570,773   12,159,623 
Net Income per diluted share $0.23  $0.15  $0.18  $0.15 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  13,313,455   7,396,784   10,322,744   7,782,361 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.17  $0.10  $0.13  $0.10 
                 
FISCAL 2017  12/31/16   3/31/17   6/30/17   9/30/17 
                 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $27,891,442  $28,018,022  $29,318,927  $31,156,914 
Total Expenses  13,972,561   14,495,329   14,840,339   16,294,148 
Other Income (Expense)  (4,064,960)  (5,098,082)  (2,748,225)  (4,600,576)
Income from Continuing Operations  9,853,921   8,424,611   11,730,363   10,262,190 
Income from Continuing Operations per diluted share $0.14  $0.12  $0.16  $0.14 
Net Income  9,853,921   8,424,611   11,730,363   10,262,190 
Net Income per diluted share $0.14  $0.12  $0.16  $0.14 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders  6,156,161   4,842,575   5,217,411   6,726,087 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.09  $0.07  $0.07  $0.09 
FISCAL 2020  12/31/19   3/31/20   6/30/20   9/30/20 
Rental and Reimbursement Revenue $41,700  $41,707  $41,775  $42,635 
Total Expenses  22,428   21,264   21,459   21,529 
Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Arising During the Periods  (3,635)  (83,075)  19,610   (10,280)
Other Income (Expense)  (9,606)  (88,721)  12,979   (17,963)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders  9,625   (68,314)  33,458   3,088 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shareholders per diluted share $0.10  $(0.70) $0.34  $0.03 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders  3,528   (75,078)  26,850   (3,917)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders per diluted share $0.04  $(0.77) $0.27  $(0.04)

142106
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

(in thousands)

Column A Column B  Column C  Column D 
           Capitalization 
        Buildings and  Subsequent to 
Description Encumbrances  Land  Improvements  Acquisition 
             
Industrial Buildings                
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $-0-  $401,716  $878,081  $6,630,869 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  -0-   218,000   1,233,500   433,754 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  -0-   310,000   1,758,000   455,644 
Richland (Jackson), MS  -0-   211,000   1,195,000   494,691 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  -0-   264,000   3,302,000   679,913 
Fayetteville, NC  -0-   172,000   4,467,885   811,744 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  -0-   1,039,800   3,694,320   443,820 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  -0-   270,000   1,236,599   186,302 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  -0-   531,000   3,653,883   547,788 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  -0-   723,000   6,498,324   176,557 
Omaha, NE  -0-   1,170,000   4,425,500   349,191 
Charlottesville, VA  -0-   1,170,000   2,845,000   440,702 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  -0-   1,165,000   4,668,080   563,878 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   695,000   3,342,000   1,696,686 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  -0-   1,160,000   6,413,305   219,090 
St. Joseph, MO  -0-   800,000   11,753,964   809,684 
Newington (Hartford), CT  -0-   410,000   2,961,000   123,108 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  -0-   980,000   5,050,997   3,735,364 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  -0-   3,200,000   5,958,773   5,353,582 
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  1,580,181   1,194,000   3,645,501   102,901 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  -0-   340,000   12,046,675   311,173 
Winston-Salem, NC  -0-   980,000   5,610,000   656,326 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  -0-   1,280,000   5,529,488   167,954 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  -0-   4,796,765   3,883,971   2,280,087 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  3,719,709   1,316,075   13,329,000   2,179,151 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle Tire)  -0-   1,185,000   5,815,148   232,838 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  -0-   5,112,120   9,186,606   4,683,748 
Richmond, VA  -0-   446,000   3,910,500   411,809 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  5,144,319   5,000,000   12,660,003   2,041,572 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  -0-   2,000,000   9,225,683   77,634 
Denver, CO  414,049   1,150,000   3,890,300   1,313,751 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  -0-   1,129,000   11,831,321   449,781 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  465,749   930,000   3,426,362   3,258,291 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  338,789   614,406   3,026,409   1,722,490 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  -0-   1,867,000   3,684,794   126,188 
Huntsville, AL  370,903   748,115   2,724,418   3,189,278 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  -0-   380,000   1,400,943   196,836 
Lakeland, FL  -0-   261,000   1,621,163   161,063 
El Paso, TX  -0-   3,225,195   4,514,427   4,691,570 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  -0-   2,676,848   7,197,945   6,572,385 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  -0-   2,830,000   4,704,531   322,589 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  -0-   760,000   13,692,115   481,568 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  -0-   1,853,000   4,817,298   793,374 
Orion, MI  -0-   4,649,971   13,053,289   5,186,864 
Chattanooga, TN  -0-   300,000   4,464,711   373,829 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  -0-   990,000   4,893,912   1,035,924 
Punta Gorda, FL  -0-   -0-   4,104,915   28,595 
Cocoa, FL  -0-   1,881,316   8,623,564   3,622,569 
Orlando, FL  -0-   2,200,000   6,133,800   440,724 
Topeka, KS  860,364   -0-   3,679,843   -0- 
Memphis, TN  5,061,376   1,234,987   13,380,000   -0- 
Houston, TX  2,148,201   1,661,120   6,320,000   182,158 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  6,455,552   1,500,000   16,240,000   79,203 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  724,766   1,746,822   10,045,000   5,282,214 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  7,217,469   2,230,000   11,985,126   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  -0-   1,100,000   4,440,000   11,227 
Edinburg, TX  -0-   1,000,000   6,414,000   4,625,014 

Column A Column B  Column C  Column D 
           Capitalization 
        Buildings and  Subsequent to 
Description Encumbrances  Land  Improvements  Acquisition 
             
Industrial Buildings                
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $0  $402  $878  $6,684 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  0   218   1,234   1,504 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  0   310   1,758   476 
Richland (Jackson), MS  0   211   1,195   495 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  0   264   3,302   684 
Fayetteville, NC  0   172   4,468   818 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  0   1,040   3,694   713 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  0   270   1,237   378 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  0   531   3,654   764 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  0   724   6,498   577 
Omaha, NE  0   1,170   4,426   368 
Charlottesville, VA  0   1,170   2,845   447 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  0   1,165   4,668   751 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  0   695   3,342   1,697 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  0   1,160   6,413   263 
St. Joseph, MO  0   800   11,754   951 
Newington (Hartford), CT  0   410   2,961   155 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  0   980   5,051   3,784 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  0   3,200   5,959   5,562 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  0   340   12,047   371 
Winston-Salem, NC  0   980   5,610   837 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  0   1,280   5,529   373 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  0   4,797   3,884   2,280 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  1,103   1,316   13,329   2,179 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlstar)  0   1,185   5,815   283 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  0   5,112   9,187   5,326 
Richmond, VA  0   446   3,911   740 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  0   5,000   12,660   2,085 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  0   2,000   9,226   77 
Denver, CO  0   1,150   3,890   1,334 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  0   1,129   11,831   1,503 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (Amazon)  0   930   3,426   4,950 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  0   614   3,026   1,723 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  0   1,867   3,685   126 
Huntsville, AL  0   748   2,724   3,190 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  0   380   1,401   212 
Lakeland, FL  0   261   1,621   161 
El Paso, TX  0   3,225   4,514   4,692 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  0   2,677   7,198   6,762 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  0   2,830   4,705   813 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  0   760   13,692   630 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  0   1,853   4,816   803 
Orion, MI  0   4,650   13,053   5,453 
Chattanooga, TN  0   300   4,465   604 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  0   990   4,894   1,420 
Punta Gorda, FL  0   0   4,105   29 
Cocoa, FL  0   1,881   8,624   3,622 
Orlando, FL  0   2,200   6,134   476 
Topeka, KS  0   0   3,680   0 
Memphis, TN  2,364   1,235   13,380   1,478 
Houston, TX  0   1,661   6,320   240 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  3,781   1,500   16,240   757 

143107
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

(in thousands)

Column A Column B  Column C  Column D 
           Capitalization 
        Buildings and  Subsequent to 
Description Encumbrances  Land  Improvements  Acquisition 
             
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH $9,300,481  $1,760,000 $17,840,000 $-0- 
Corpus Christi, TX  -0-   -0-   4,764,500   43,830 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  -0-   1,190,000   4,335,600   -0- 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   240,000   4,176,000   36,425 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda)  7,564,186   800,000   13,750,000   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  3,416,097   1,410,000   8,043,000   3,131,462 
Waco, TX  4,234,777   1,350,000   7,383,000   3,818,368 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  6,294,503   320,000   13,380,000   62,030 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  21,722,567   2,550,000   24,818,816   9,546,101 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  4,395,246   1,740,000   8,460,000   -0- 
Green Bay, WI  2,640,432   590,000   5,980,000   -0- 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  2,115,962   900,000   4,320,000   -0- 
Tulsa, OK  1,685,288   790,000   2,910,000   48,031 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  15,305,669   2,280,000   24,353,125   174,727 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  9,189,343   2,750,000   15,335,492   208,616 
Altoona, PA  3,253,281   1,200,000   7,790,000   32,966 
Spring (Houston), TX  7,924,865   1,890,000   13,391,318   4,013,078 
Indianapolis, IN  10,437,151   3,745,572   20,446,000   1,312,510 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  8,563,797   1,890,000   13,310,000   4,950 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  5,638,258   540,000   9,390,000   35,550 
Kansas City, MO  6,633,001   1,000,000   8,600,000   380,250 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  16,639,132   1,850,000   26,150,000   -0- 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  16,243,754   6,000,000   24,645,954   89,748 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  7,126,384   1,800,000   11,137,000   4,587,760 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  20,159,025   2,250,000   35,234,574   27,497 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  20,753,864   8,200,000   27,100,832   -0- 
Cincinnati, OH  -0-   800,000   5,950,000   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  -0-   480,000   4,620,000   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  17,813,451   4,305,000   27,670,897   1,068,900 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  11,133,990   2,720,000   15,690,000   -0- 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  11,199,661   3,700,000   16,250,000   -0- 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  17,757,364   8,000,000   22,210,680   17,867 
Colorado Springs, CO  16,651,710   2,150,000   26,350,000   820,066 
Louisville, KY  6,525,135   1,590,000   9,714,000   -0- 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  23,702,918   7,060,000   30,720,000   -0- 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  19,956,867   2,350,000   29,387,000   -0- 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  21,328,714   1,700,000   33,150,000   -0- 
Ft. Myers, FL  13,280,803   2,486,417   18,400,000   777,218 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  19,468,554   4,034,363   27,620,623   -0- 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  30,928,224   6,247,658   43,632,835   -0- 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  14,471,117   1,362,458   19,677,937   -0- 
Homestead (Miami), FL  23,313,676   4,426,727   33,446,393   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  5,537,962   844,688   7,883,751   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  24,863,355   4,306,684   35,736,461   -0- 
Kenton, OH  11,473,387   854,780   17,026,827   -0- 
Stow, OH  12,130,343   1,429,715   17,504,350   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  13,683,131   4,639,283   16,847,923   32,205 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  19,013,593   1,618,240   28,260,702   -0- 
Savannah, GA  32,215,696   4,404,988   51,620,957   -0- 
Daytona Beach, FL  19,187,819   3,119,640   26,853,559   -0- 
Mobile, AL  18,832,395   2,480,474   30,571,842   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  29,860,000   7,103,106   39,473,274   -0- 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  39,700,000   13,964,652   46,262,482   -0- 
Shopping Center                
Somerset, NJ  -0-   34,317   637,097   2,440,363 
Vacant Land                
Shelby County, TN  -0-   11,065   -0-   -0- 
  $719,768,355  $224,719,083  $1,380,703,773  $114,155,563 

Column A Column B  Column C  Column D 
           Capitalization 
        Buildings and  Subsequent to 
Description Encumbrances  Land  Improvements  Acquisition 
             
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC $0  $1,747  $10,045  $5,272 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  0   2,230   11,985   0 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  0   1,100   4,440   11 
Edinburg, TX  0   1,000   6,414   4,625 
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH  7,332   1,760   17,840   0 
Corpus Christi, TX  0   0   4,765   43 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  0   1,190   4,336   1,215 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  0   240   4,176   139 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals Inc.)  5,558   800   13,750   0 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  1,767   1,410   8,043   3,172 
Waco, TX  3,280   1,350   7,383   3,818 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  4,267   320   13,380   188 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  16,095   2,550   24,819   9,546 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  2,866   1,740   8,460   0 
Green Bay, WI  1,613   590   5,979   11 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  1,292   900   4,320   12 
Tulsa, OK  1,267   790   2,910   48 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  12,993   2,280   24,353   175 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  6,804   2,750   15,335   209 
Altoona, PA  1,987   1,200   7,790   33 
Spring (Houston), TX  5,931   1,890   13,391   4,048 
Indianapolis, IN  7,366   3,746   20,446   1,312 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  6,659   1,890   13,310   2,209 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  4,393   948   9,390   1,965 
Kansas City, MO  0   1,000   8,600   403 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  13,483   1,850   26,150   0 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  12,587   6,000   24,646   280 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  11,453   1,800   11,137   8,640 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (ULTA)  15,855   2,250   35,235   289 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  16,364   8,200   27,101   347 
Cincinnati, OH  0   800   5,950   0 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  0   480   4,620   0 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  14,197   4,305   27,671   1,078 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  8,917   2,720   15,690   16 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  8,734   3,700   16,250   40 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  14,264   8,000   22,211   160 
Colorado Springs, CO  13,469   2,150   26,350   820 
Louisville, KY  5,267   1,590   9,714   0 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  19,243   7,060   30,721   306 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  16,217   3,616   29,387   2,444 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  17,411   1,700   33,150   290 
Ft. Myers, FL  10,873   2,486   18,400   798 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  16,027   4,034   27,621   0 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  25,461   6,248   43,632   0 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  12,003   1,362   19,678   0 
Homestead (Miami), FL  19,193   4,427   33,446   39 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  4,243   845   7,883   0 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  20,587   4,307   35,736   0 
Kenton, OH  9,592   855   17,027   849 
Stow, OH  10,106   1,430   17,504   0 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  11,444   4,639   16,848   52 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  16,501   1,618   28,260   0 

144108
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

Column A Column E (1) (2) 
  Gross Amount at Which Carried 
  September 30, 2018 
Description Land  Bldg & Imp  Total 
          
Industrial Buildings            
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $401,716  $7,508,950  $7,910,666 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  218,000   1,667,254   1,885,254 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  310,000   2,213,644   2,523,644 
Richland (Jackson), MS  211,000   1,689,691   1,900,691 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  264,000   3,981,913   4,245,913 
Fayetteville, NC  172,000   5,279,629   5,451,629 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  1,039,800   4,138,140   5,177,940 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  270,000   1,422,901   1,692,901 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  531,000   4,201,671   4,732,671 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  723,000   6,674,881   7,397,881 
Omaha, NE  1,170,000   4,774,691   5,944,691 
Charlottesville, VA  1,170,000   3,285,702   4,455,702 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  1,165,000   5,231,958   6,396,958 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  695,000   5,038,686   5,733,686 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  1,160,000   6,632,395   7,792,395 
St. Joseph, MO  800,000   12,563,648   13,363,648 
Newington (Hartford), CT  410,000   3,084,108   3,494,108 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  980,000   8,786,361   9,766,361 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  3,200,000   11,312,355   14,512,355 
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  1,194,000   3,748,402   4,942,402 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  340,000   12,357,848   12,697,848 
Winston-Salem, NC  980,000   6,266,326   7,246,326 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  1,280,000   5,697,442   6,977,442 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  4,796,765   6,164,058   10,960,823 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  1,316,075   15,508,151   16,824,226 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle Tire)  1,185,000   6,047,986   7,232,986 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  5,112,120   13,870,354   18,982,474 
Richmond, VA  446,000   4,322,309   4,768,309 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  5,000,000   14,701,575   19,701,575 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  2,000,000   9,303,317   11,303,317 
Denver, CO  1,150,000   5,204,051   6,354,051 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  1,129,000   12,281,102   13,410,102 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  930,000   6,684,653   7,614,653 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  614,406   4,748,899   5,363,305 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  1,867,000   3,810,982   5,677,982 
Huntsville, AL  748,115   5,913,696   6,661,811 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  380,000   1,597,779   1,977,779 
Lakeland, FL  261,000   1,782,226   2,043,226 
El Paso, TX  3,225,195   9,205,997   12,431,192 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  2,676,848   13,770,330   16,447,178 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  2,830,000   5,027,120   7,857,120 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  760,000   14,173,683   14,933,683 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  1,853,000   5,610,672   7,463,672 
Orion, MI  4,649,971   18,240,153   22,890,124 
Chattanooga, TN  300,000   4,838,540   5,138,540 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  990,000   5,929,836   6,919,836 
Punta Gorda, FL  -0-   4,133,510   4,133,510 
Cocoa, FL  1,881,316   12,246,133   14,127,449 
Orlando, FL  2,200,000   6,574,524   8,774,524 
Topeka, KS  -0-   3,679,843   3,679,843 
Memphis, TN  1,234,987   13,380,000   14,614,987 
Houston, TX  1,661,120   6,502,158   8,163,278 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  1,500,000   16,319,203   17,819,203 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  1,746,822   15,327,214   17,074,036 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  2,230,000   11,985,126   14,215,126 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  1,100,000   4,451,227   5,551,227 
Edinburg, TX  1,000,000   11,039,014   12,039,014 

(in thousands)

Column A Column B  Column C  Column D 
           Capitalization 
        Buildings and  Subsequent to 
Description Encumbrances  Land  Improvements  Acquisition 
             
Savannah, GA (Shaw) $26,273  $4,405  $51,621  $0 
Daytona Beach, FL  16,170   3,120   26,855   899 
Mobile, AL  15,609   2,480   30,572   0 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  25,171   7,103   39,473   0 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  33,730   13,965   46,262   11 
Trenton, NJ  47,039   8,336   75,652   0 
Savannah, GA (FDX Ground)  15,091   3,441   24,091   0 
Lafayette, IN  15,234   2,802   22,277   0 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (Amazon)  48,802   4,839   74,525   0 
Lancaster (Columbus), OH  8,311   959   16,599   0 
Whitsett (Greensboro), NC  28,277   2,735   43,976   0 
Ogden (Salt Lake City), UT  7,805   1,287   11,380   0 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon II)  9,272   1,378   13,584   0 
Plain City (Columbus), OH  45,322   6,554   65,187   0 
Locust Grove (Atlanta), GA  55,307   9,667   83,569   0 
Burlington, VT  0   7,729   46,096   0 
Kodak (Knoxville), TN  0   2,918   30,972   0 
Shopping Center                
Somerset, NJ  0   35   637   2,467 
Vacant Land                
Shelby County, TN  0   11   0   0 
  $839,622  $277,846  $1,884,965  $140,879 

145109
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED GROSS DEPRECIATION

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

(in thousands)

Column A Column E (1) (2) 
  Gross Amount at Which Carried 
  September 30, 2018 
Description Land  Bldg & Imp  Total 
          
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH $1,760,000  $17,840,000  $19,600,000 
Corpus Christi, TX  -0-   4,808,330   4,808,330 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  1,190,000   4,335,600   5,525,600 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  240,000   4,212,425   4,452,425 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals Inc.)  800,000   13,750,000   14,550,000 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  1,410,000   11,174,462   12,584,462 
Waco, TX  1,350,000   11,201,368   12,551,368 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  320,000   13,442,030   13,762,030 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  2,550,000   34,364,917   36,914,917 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  1,740,000   8,460,000   10,200,000 
Green Bay, WI  590,000   5,980,000   6,570,000 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  900,000   4,320,000   5,220,000 
Tulsa, OK  790,000   2,958,031   3,748,031 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  2,280,000   24,527,852   26,807,852 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  2,750,000   15,544,108   18,294,108 
Altoona, PA  1,200,000   7,822,966   9,022,966 
Spring (Houston), TX  1,890,000   17,404,396   19,294,396 
Indianapolis, IN  3,745,572   21,758,510   25,504,082 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  1,890,000   13,314,950   15,204,950 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  540,000   9,425,550   9,965,550 
Kansas City, MO  1,000,000   8,980,250   9,980,250 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  1,850,000   26,150,000   28,000,000 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  6,000,000   24,735,702   30,735,702 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  1,800,000   15,724,760   17,524,760 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  2,250,000   35,262,071   37,512,071 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  8,200,000   27,100,832   35,300,832 
Cincinnati, OH  800,000   5,950,000   6,750,000 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  480,000   4,620,000   5,100,000 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  4,305,000   28,739,797   33,044,797 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  2,720,000   15,690,000   18,410,000 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  3,700,000   16,250,000   19,950,000 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  8,000,000   22,228,547   30,228,547 
Colorado Springs, CO  2,150,000   27,170,066   29,320,066 
Louisville, KY  1,590,000   9,714,000   11,304,000 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  7,060,000   30,720,000   37,780,000 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  2,350,000   29,387,000   31,737,000 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  1,700,000   33,150,000   34,850,000 
Ft. Myers, FL  2,486,417   19,177,218   21,663,635 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  4,034,363   27,620,623   31,654,986 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  6,247,658   43,632,835   49,880,493 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  1,362,458   19,677,937   21,040,395 
Homestead (Miami), FL  4,426,727   33,446,393   37,873,120 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  844,688   7,883,751   8,728,439 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  4,306,684   35,736,461   40,043,145 
Kenton, OH  854,780   17,026,827   17,881,607 
Stow, OH  1,429,715   17,504,350   18,934,065 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  4,639,283   16,880,128   21,519,411 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  1,618,240   28,260,702   29,878,942 
Savannah, GA  4,404,988   51,620,957   56,025,945 
Daytona Beach, FL  3,119,640   26,853,559   29,973,199 
Mobile, AL  2,480,474   30,571,842   33,052,316 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  7,103,106   39,473,274   46,576,380 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  13,964,652   46,262,482   60,227,134 
Shopping Center            
Somerset, NJ  34,317   3,077,460   3,111,777 
Vacant Land            
Shelby County, TN  11,065   -0-   11,065 
  $224,719,083  $1,494,859,336  $1,719,578,419 

Column A Column E (1) (2) 
  Gross Amount at Which Carried 
  September 30, 2021 
Description Land  Bldg & Imp  Total 
          
Industrial Buildings            
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $402  $7,562  $7,964 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  218   2,738   2,956 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  310   2,234   2,544 
Richland (Jackson), MS  211   1,690   1,901 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  264   3,986   4,250 
Fayetteville, NC  172   5,286   5,458 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  1,040   4,407   5,447 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  270   1,615   1,885 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  531   4,418   4,949 
 Liberty (Kansas City), MO  724   7,075   7,799 
Omaha, NE  1,170   4,794   5,964 
Charlottesville, VA  1,170   3,292   4,462 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  1,165   5,419   6,584 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  695   5,039   5,734 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  1,160   6,676   7,836 
St. Joseph, MO  800   12,705   13,505 
Newington (Hartford), CT  410   3,116   3,526 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  980   8,835   9,815 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  3,200   11,521   14,721 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  340   12,418   12,758 
Winston-Salem, NC  980   6,447   7,427 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  1,280   5,902   7,182 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  4,797   6,164   10,961 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  1,316   15,508   16,824 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlstar)  1,185   6,098   7,283 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  5,112   14,513   19,625 
Richmond, VA  446   4,651   5,097 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  5,000   14,745   19,745 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  2,000   9,303   11,303 
Denver, CO  1,150   5,224   6,374 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  1,129   13,334   14,463 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (Amazon)  930   8,376   9,306 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  614   4,749   5,363 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  1,867   3,811   5,678 
Huntsville, AL  748   5,914   6,662 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  380   1,613   1,993 
Lakeland, FL  261   1,782   2,043 
El Paso, TX  3,225   9,206   12,431 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  2,677   13,960   16,637 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  2,830   5,518   8,348 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  760   14,322   15,082 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  1,853   5,619   7,472 
Orion, MI  4,650   18,506   23,156 
Chattanooga, TN  300   5,069   5,369 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  990   6,314   7,304 
Punta Gorda, FL  0   4,134   4,134 
Cocoa, FL  1,881   12,246   14,127 
Orlando, FL  2,200   6,610   8,810 
Topeka, KS  0   3,680   3,680 
Memphis, TN  1,235   14,858   16,093 
Houston, TX  1,661   6,560   8,221 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  1,500   16,997   18,497 

110
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(in thousands)

Column A Column E (1) (2) 
  Gross Amount at Which Carried 
  September 30, 2021 
Description Land  Bldg & Imp  Total 
          
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC $1,747  $15,317  $17,064 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  2,230   11,985   14,215 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  1,100   4,451   5,551 
Edinburg, TX  1,000   11,039   12,039 
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH  1,760   17,840   19,600 
Corpus Christi, TX  0   4,808   4,808 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  1,190   5,551   6,741 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  240   4,315   4,555 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals Inc.)  800   13,750   14,550 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  1,410   11,215   12,625 
Waco, TX  1,350   11,201   12,551 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  320   13,568   13,888 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  2,550   34,365   36,915 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  1,740   8,460   10,200 
Green Bay, WI  590   5,990   6,580 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  900   4,332   5,232 
Tulsa, OK  790   2,958   3,748 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  2,280   24,528   26,808 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  2,750   15,544   18,294 
Altoona, PA  1,200   7,823   9,023 
Spring (Houston), TX  1,890   17,439   19,329 
Indianapolis, IN  3,746   21,758   25,504 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  1,890   15,519   17,409 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  948   11,355   12,303 
Kansas City, MO  1,000   9,003   10,003 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  1,850   26,150   28,000 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  6,000   24,926   30,926 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  1,800   19,777   21,577 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (ULTA)  2,250   35,524   37,774 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  8,200   27,448   35,648 
Cincinnati, OH  800   5,950   6,750 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  480   4,620   5,100 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  4,305   28,749   33,054 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  2,720   15,706   18,426 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  3,700   16,290   19,990 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  8,000   22,371   30,371 
Colorado Springs, CO  2,150   27,170   29,320 
Louisville, KY  1,590   9,714   11,304 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  7,060   31,027   38,087 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  3,616   31,831   35,447 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  1,700   33,440   35,140 
Ft. Myers, FL  2,486   19,198   21,684 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  4,034   27,621   31,655 
 Mesquite (Dallas), TX  6,248   43,632   49,880 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  1,362   19,678   21,040 
Homestead (Miami), FL  4,427   33,485   37,912 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  845   7,883   8,728 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  4,307   35,736   40,043 
Kenton, OH  855   17,876   18,731 
Stow, OH  1,430   17,504   18,934 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  4,639   16,900   21,539 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  1,618   28,260   29,878 

111
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(in thousands)

Column A Column E (1) (2) 
  Gross Amount at Which Carried 
  September 30, 2021 
Description Land  Bldg & Imp  Total 
          
Savannah, GA (Shaw) $4,405  $51,621  $56,026 
Daytona Beach, FL  3,120   27,754   30,874 
Mobile, AL  2,480   30,572   33,052 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  7,103   39,473   46,576 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  13,965   46,273   60,238 
Trenton, NJ  8,336   75,652   83,988 
Savannah, GA (FDX Ground)  3,441   24,091   27,532 
Lafayette, IN  2,802   22,277   25,079 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (Amazon)  4,839   74,525   79,364 
Lancaster (Columbus), OH  959   16,599   17,558 
Whitsett (Greensboro), NC  2,735   43,976   46,711 
Ogden (Salt Lake City), UT  1,287   11,380   12,667 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon II)  1,378   13,584   14,962 
Plain City (Columbus), OH  6,554   65,187   71,741 
Locust Grove (Atlanta), GA  9,667   83,569   93,236 
Burlington, VT  7,729   46,096   53,825 
Kodak (Knoxville), TN  2,918   30,972   33,890 
Shopping Center            
Somerset, NJ  35   3,104   3,139 
Vacant Land            
Shelby County, TN  11   0   11 
  $277,846  $2,025,844  $2,303,690 

(1)See pages 152-154125-128 for reconciliation.
(2)The aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes approximates historical cost.

146112
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

SCHEDULE OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION LIFE

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

(in thousands)

Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
Industrial Buildings                
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $2,957,471   1977   1977   (3)
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  1,313,173   1988   1993   (3)
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  1,211,364   1985   1994   (3)
Richland (Jackson), MS  982,066   1986   1994   (3)
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  2,361,768   1989   1994   (3)
Fayetteville, NC  2,931,202   1996   1997   (3)
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  2,283,345   1997   1997   (3)
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  741,290   1997   1997   (3)
Romulus (Detroit), MI  2,043,189   1998   1998   (3)
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  3,497,982   1997   1998   (3)
Omaha, NE  2,358,451   1999   1999   (3)
Charlottesville, VA  1,588,202   1998   1999   (3)
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  2,619,003   1998   1999   (3)
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  2,305,181   1999   2000   (3)
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  3,007,443   2000   2001   (3)
St. Joseph, MO  5,452,138   2000   2001   (3)
Newington (Hartford), CT  1,377,254   2001   2001   (3)
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  3,296,930   2001   2001   (3)
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  4,151,339   2000   2001   (3)
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  1,029,584   1977   2001   (3)
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  5,183,974   2001   2001   (3)
Winston-Salem, NC  2,617,877   2001   2002   (3)
Elgin (Chicago), IL  2,436,368   2002   2002   (3)
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  1,851,798   2000   2002   (3)
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  6,144,623   2002   2003   (3)
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle Tire)  2,538,608   2002   2003   (3)
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  4,430,770   2003   2003   (3)
Richmond, VA  1,545,670   2004   2004   (3)
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  4,921,899   2004   2004   (3)
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  2,761,952   2004   2004   (3)
Denver, CO  1,704,122   2005   2005   (3)
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  4,343,346   2002   2005   (3)
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  2,071,138   2005   2005   (3)
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  1,509,465   2005   2005   (3)
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  1,144,249   1989   2005   (3)
Huntsville, AL  1,249,093   2005   2005   (3)
Augusta, GA (FDX)  463,245   1993   2006   (3)
Lakeland, FL  573,621   1993   2006   (3)
El Paso, TX  1,977,282   2005   2006   (3)
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  3,083,114   2006   2006   (3)
Tampa, FL (FDX)  1,515,388   2006   2006   (3)
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  4,493,178   2006   2006   (3)
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  1,706,454   1996   2007   (3)
Orion, MI  4,488,942   2007   2007   (3)
Chattanooga, TN  1,388,863   2002   2007   (3)
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  1,893,515   1998   2007   (3)
Punta Gorda, FL  1,058,498   2007   2007   (3)
Cocoa, FL  2,758,147   2006   2008   (3)
Orlando, FL  1,830,818   1997   2008   (3)
Topeka, KS  896,483   2006   2009   (3)
Memphis, TN  2,916,162   1994   2010   (3)
Houston, TX  1,440,389   2005   2010   (3)
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  3,555,283   2009   2010   (3)
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  2,654,658   2009   2010   (3)
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  2,151,164   1993   2011   (3)
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  859,960   1998-2008   2011   (3)
Edinburg, TX  1,472,631   2011   2011   (3)

Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
Industrial Buildings                
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $3,730   1973   1973   (3)
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  1,585   1989   1993   (3)
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  1,459   1985   1994   (3)
Richland (Jackson), MS  1,200   1986   1994   (3)
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  2,735   1989   1995   (3)
Fayetteville, NC  3,532   1996   1997   (3)
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  2,671   1997   1997   (3)
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  869   1998   1998   (3)
Romulus (Detroit), MI  2,477   1998   1998   (3)
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  4,128   1998   1998   (3)
Omaha, NE  2,734   1999   1999   (3)
Charlottesville, VA  1,905   1998   1999   (3)
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  3,159   1997   1999   (3)
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  2,842   1999   2000   (3)
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  3,560   2000   2001   (3)
St. Joseph, MO  6,518   2001   2001   (3)
Newington (Hartford), CT  1,635   2001   2001   (3)
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  4,075   2001   2001   (3)
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  5,045   2001   2001   (3)
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  6,252   2001   2002   (3)
Winston-Salem, NC  3,239   2001   2002   (3)
Elgin (Chicago), IL  2,984   2002   2002   (3)
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  2,330   2001   2007   (3)
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  7,674   2002   2003   (3)
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlstar)  3,014   2002   2003   (3)
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  5,600   2003   2003   (3)
Richmond, VA  1,937   2004   2004   (3)
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  6,059   2004   2004   (3)
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  3,484   2000   2005   (3)
Denver, CO  2,108   2004   2005   (3)
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  5,791   2002   2005   (3)
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (Amazon)  2,852   2005   2005   (3)
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  1,878   2004   2005   (3)
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  1,448   1989   2005   (3)
Huntsville, AL  1,714   2004   2005   (3)
Augusta, GA (FDX)  602   1993   2007   (3)
Lakeland, FL  724   1993   2007   (3)
El Paso, TX  2,780   2006   2007   (3)
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  4,156   2005   2006   (3)
Tampa, FL (FDX)  2,004   1997   2006   (3)
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  5,716   2003   2006   (3)
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  2,286   1996   2007   (3)
Orion, MI  5,902   2007   2007   (3)
Chattanooga, TN  1,827   2003   2007   (3)
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  2,530   1998   2007   (3)
Punta Gorda, FL  1,398   2007   2007   (3)
Cocoa, FL  3,725   2006   2008   (3)
Orlando, FL  2,405   1997   2008   (3)
Topeka, KS  1,179   2006   2009   (3)
Memphis, TN  4,278   1994   2010   (3)
Houston, TX  2,019   2006   2010   (3)
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  4,908   2009   2010   (3)

147113
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

(in thousands)

Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH $2,973,333   2012   2012   (3)
Corpus Christi, TX  797,350   2012   2012   (3)
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  722,600   2012   2012   (3)
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  704,125   2012   2012   (3)
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals Inc.)  2,203,526   2012   2012   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  1,599,042   2012   2012   (3)
Waco, TX  1,498,728   2012   2012   (3)
Livonia (Detroit), MI  2,046,869   1999   2013   (3)
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  4,044,199   2013   2013   (3)
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  1,147,885   2013   2013   (3)
Green Bay, WI  766,667   2013   2013   (3)
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  553,846   2013   2013   (3)
Tulsa, OK  391,119   2009   2014   (3)
Buckner (Louisville), KY  3,114,323   2014   2014   (3)
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  2,001,778   2014   2014   (3)
Altoona, PA  986,269   2014   2014   (3)
Spring (Houston), TX  2,077,166   2014   2014   (3)
Indianapolis, IN  2,239,839   2014   2014   (3)
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  1,366,159   2015   2015   (3)
Lindale (Tyler), TX  966,498   2015   2015   (3)
Kansas City, MO  885,643   2015   2015   (3)
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  2,570,299   2015   2015   (3)
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  2,323,375   2015   2015   (3)
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  1,023,271   2015   2015   (3)
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  3,091,837   2015   2015   (3)
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  2,200,495   2015   2015   (3)
Cincinnati, OH  470,406   2014   2015   (3)
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  473,846   2012   2015   (3)
Concord (Charlotte), NC  2,314,361   2016   2016   (3)
Covington (New Orleans), LA  1,139,872   2016   2016   (3)
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  1,076,389   2016   2016   (3)
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  1,426,792   2016   2016   (3)
Colorado Springs, CO  1,593,580   2016   2016   (3)
Louisville, KY  581,179   2016   2016   (3)
Davenport (Orlando), FL  1,706,667   2016   2016   (3)
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  1,632,611   2016   2016   (3)
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  1,700,000   2017   2017   (3)
Ft. Myers, FL  842,928   2017   2017   (3)
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  1,062,332   2017   2017   (3)
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  1,398,488   2017   2017   (3)
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  630,703   2017   2017   (3)
Homestead (Miami), FL  1,072,000   2017   2017   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  252,684   2017   2017   (3)
Concord (Charlotte), NC  1,069,039   2017   2017   (3)
Kenton, OH  454,776   2017   2017   (3)
Stow, OH  448,829   2017   2017   (3)
Charleston, SC (FDX)  397,072   2017   2018   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  603,861   2017   2018   (3)
Savannah, GA  882,410   2018   2018   (3)
Daytona Beach, FL  344,276   2018   2018   (3)
Mobile, AL  195,973   2018   2018   (3)
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  168,689   2018   2018   (3)
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  98,855   2018   2018   (3)
Shopping Center                
Somerset, NJ  1,589,653   1970   1970   (3)
Vacant Land                
Shelby County, TN  -0-   N/A   2007   N/A 
  $207,065,634             

Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC $3,826   2010   2010   (3)
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  3,073   1993   2011   (3)
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  1,206   1998-2008   2011   (3)
Edinburg, TX  2,324   2011   2011   (3)
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH  4,346   2012   2012   (3)
Corpus Christi, TX  1,176   2011   2012   (3)
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  1,134   2011   2012   (3)
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  1,069   2008   2012   (3)
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals Inc.)  3,261   2012   2012   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  2,479   2012   2012   (3)
Waco, TX  2,363   2012   2012   (3)
Livonia (Detroit), MI  3,127   1999   2013   (3)
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  6,697   2012   2012   (3)
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  1,799   2013   2013   (3)
Green Bay, WI  1,227   2013   2014   (3)
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  888   2013   2013   (3)
Tulsa, OK  631   2009   2014   (3)
Buckner (Louisville), KY  5,039   2014   2014   (3)
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  3,245   2013   2014   (3)
Altoona, PA  1,595   2013   2014   (3)
Spring (Houston), TX  3,432   2013   2014   (3)
Indianapolis, IN  4,009   2014   2014   (3)
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  2,391   2014   2015   (3)
Lindale (Tyler), TX  1,699   2014   2015   (3)
Kansas City, MO  1,670   2015   2015   (3)
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  4,582   2015   2015   (3)
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  4,305   2015   2015   (3)
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  2,452   2015   2015   (3)
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (ULTA)  5,828   2015   2015   (3)
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  4,358   2015   2015   (3)
Cincinnati, OH  928   2015   2015   (3)
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  829   2012   2015   (3)
Concord (Charlotte), NC  4,847   2015   2016   (3)
Covington (New Orleans), LA  2,352   2015   2016   (3)
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  2,331   2016   2016   (3)
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  3,154   2015   2016   (3)
Colorado Springs, CO  3,744   2016   2016   (3)
Louisville, KY  1,328   2016   2016   (3)
Davenport (Orlando), FL  4,094   2016   2016   (3)
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  3,960   2016   2017   (3)
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  4,313   2016   2017   (3)
Ft. Myers, FL  2,312   2017   2017   (3)
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  3,187   2017   2017   (3)
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  4,755   2017   2017   (3)
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  2,144   2017   2017   (3)
Homestead (Miami), FL  3,656   2017   2017   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  859   2017   2017   (3)
Concord (Charlotte), NC  3,818   2017   2017   (3)
Kenton, OH  1,970   2017   2017   (3)
Stow, OH  1,795   2017   2017   (3)
Charleston, SC (FDX)  1,703   2017   2018   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  2,778   2018   2018   (3)

114
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(in thousands)

Column A Column F  Column G  Column H  Column I 
  Accumulated  Date of  Date  Depreciable 
Description Depreciation  Construction  Acquired  Life 
             
Savannah, GA (Shaw) $4,853   2018   2018   (3)
Daytona Beach, FL  2,454   2018   2018   (3)
Mobile, AL  2,548   2018   2018   (3)
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  3,205   2018   2018   (3)
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  3,659   2018   2018   (3)
Trenton, NJ  5,819   2017   2019   (3)
Savannah, GA (FDX Ground)  1,750   2019   2019   (3)
Lafayette, IN  1,238   2019   2019   (3)
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (Amazon)  3,822   2020   2020   (3)
Lancaster (Columbus), OH  638   2020   2020   (3)
Whitsett (Greensboro), NC  1,503   2020   2020   (3)
Ogden (Salt Lake City), UT  389   2020   2020   (3)
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon II)  363   2020   2020   (3)
Plain City (Columbus), OH  1,254   2021   2021   (3)
Locust Grove (Atlanta), GA  1,607   2021   2021   (3)
Burlington, VT  197   2021   2021   (3)
Kodak (Knoxville), TN  66   2021   2021   (3)
Shopping Center                
Somerset, NJ  1,873   1969   1970   (3)
Vacant Land                
Shelby County, TN  0   N/A   2007   N/A 
  $345,988             

(3)Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated lives:
Building: 31.5 to 39 years; Building Improvements: 3 to 39 years; Tenant Improvements: Lease Term

Building: 31.5 to 39 years; Building Improvements: 3 to 39 years; Tenant Improvements: Lease Term

148115
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

SCHEDULE OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

(in thousands)

(1)Reconciliation

(1)Reconciliation

REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

 9/30/2018 9/30/2017 9/30/2016  9/30/2021 9/30/2020 9/30/2019 
              
Balance-Beginning of Year $1,431,916,534  $1,150,395,427  $920,143,937  $2,043,864  $1,866,518  $1,719,578 
Additions:                        
Acquisitions  277,253,327   282,509,249   209,867,577   252,693   171,262   136,598 
Improvements  10,408,558   4,168,984   20,383,913   12,430   6,084   10,342 
Total Additions  287,661,885   286,678,233   230,251,490   265,123   177,346   146,940 
Deletions:                        
Sales  -0-   (5,157,126)  -0-   (5,297)  0   0 
Total Deletions  -0-   (5,157,126)  -0-   (5,297)  0   0 
                        
Balance-End of Year $1,719,578,419  $1,431,916,534  $1,150,395,427  $2,303,690  $2,043,864  $1,866,518 

ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

SCHEDULE OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

  9/30/2018  9/30/2017  9/30/2016 
          
Balance-Beginning of Year $171,086,083  $143,006,233  $119,545,674 
Depreciation  36,017,959   29,015,821   23,460,559 
Sales  (38,408)  (935,971)  -0- 
             
Balance-End of Year $207,065,634  $171,086,083  $143,006,233 

  9/30/2021  9/30/2020  9/30/2019 
          
Balance-Beginning of Year $296,020  $249,584  $207,065 
Depreciation  51,250   46,436   42,519 
Sales  (1,282)  0   0 
             
Balance-End of Year $345,988  $296,020  $249,584 

149116
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

(1)Reconciliation(in thousands)

  2018  2017  2016 
Balance – Beginning of Year $1,431,916,534  $1,150,395,427  $920,143,937 
Additions:            
Somerset, NJ $38,887   -0-   377,637 
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA  24,825   79,618   37,255 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  26,663   -0-   7,797 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  267,031   94,717   -0- 
Richland (Jackson), MS  -0-   -0-   -0- 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Fayetteville, NC  -0-   9,753   557,354 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  -0-   196,526   13,775 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  -0-   -0-   8,700 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  65,165   66,974   -0- 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  -0-   -0-   24,263 
Omaha, NE  -0-   -0-   7,410 
Charlottesville, VA  98,714   8,489   4,462 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  67,174   83,383   16,983 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   4,996   -0- 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  7,384   26,830   18,510 
St. Joseph, MO  74,378   55,564   50,934 
Newington (Hartford), CT  -0-   30,284   -0- 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  384,000   -0-   8,689 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  -0-   -0-   44,600 
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  38,813   -0-   13,877 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  -0-   155,034   156,139 
Winston-Salem, NC  7,713   -0-   316,527 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  -0-   44,526   5,960 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  -0-   -0-   1,655,640 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlisle Tire)  -0-   7,585   -0- 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  444,822   -0-   -0- 
Richmond, VA  -0-   -0-   7,540 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  5,348   125   1,247,140 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  4,950   -0-   -0- 
Denver, CO  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  35,661   33,849   40,000 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (FDX Ground)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  -0-   9,270   25,161 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  -0-   -0-   26,916 
Huntsville, AL  -0-   56,688   1,853,390 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  -0-   6,047   24,700 
Lakeland, FL  60,694   -0-   16,321 
El Paso, TX  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  11,700   -0-   -0- 
Colorado Springs, CO (A)  -0-   -0-   9,357 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  237,196   27,063   27,144 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  64,826   -0-   -0- 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  58,225   -0-   -0- 
Orion, MI  4,488   -0-   5,867 
Chattanooga, TN  122,022   4,315   41,042 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  -0-   55,957   84,288 
Punta Gorda, FL  -0-   20,245   8,350 
Cocoa, FL  -0-   -0-   37,606 
Orlando, FL  220,092   -0-   13,195 
Topeka, KS  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Memphis, TN  (6,950)  1,050   -0- 
Houston, TX  14,820   65,351   -0- 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  -0-   50,097   24,806 
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC  1,660,729   -0-   -0- 
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Edinburg, TX  -0-   615,142   3,985,389 
(1)Reconciliation

RECONCILIATION OF REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

  2021  2020  2019 
Balance – Beginning of Year $2,043,864  $1,866,518  $1,719,578 
Additions:            
Monaca (Pittsburgh), PA $11  $42  $0 
Ridgeland (Jackson), MS  220   425   426 
Urbandale (Des Moines), IA  0   0   20 
Richland (Jackson), MS  0   0   0 
O’Fallon (St. Louis), MO  0   0   4 
Fayetteville, NC  3   0   4 
Schaumburg (Chicago), IL  0   269   0 
Burr Ridge (Chicago), IL  178   0   14 
Romulus (Detroit), MI  0   0   217 
Liberty (Kansas City), MO  0   262   137 
Omaha, NE  0   0   19 
Charlottesville, VA  0   0   6 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX)  0   0   187 
West Chester Twp. (Cincinnati), OH  0   0   0 
Mechanicsville (Richmond), VA  9   21   14 
St. Joseph, MO  106   10   25 
Newington (Hartford), CT  19   13   0 
Cudahy (Milwaukee), WI  8   0   41 
Beltsville (Washington, DC), MD  208   0   0 
Carlstadt (New York, NY), NJ  0   0   354 
Granite City (St. Louis, MO), IL  60   0   0 
Winston-Salem, NC  163   17   0 
Elgin (Chicago), IL  3   204   0 
Cheektowaga (Buffalo), NY  0   0   0 
Tolleson (Phoenix), AZ  0   0   0 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (Carlstar)  0   50   0 
Wheeling (Chicago), IL  632   0   10 
Richmond, VA  7   184   138 
Tampa, FL (FDX Ground)  0   44   0 
Montgomery (Chicago), IL  0   0   0 
Denver, CO  0   10   10 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (SAIC)  0   447   606 
Hanahan (Charleston), SC (Amazon)  3   1,613   75 
Augusta, GA (FDX Ground)  0   0   0 
Tampa, FL (Tampa Bay Grand Prix)  0   0   0 
Huntsville, AL  0   0   0 
Augusta, GA (FDX)  9   0   6 
Lakeland, FL  0   0   0 
El Paso, TX  0   0   0 
Richfield (Cleveland), OH  190   0   0 
Tampa, FL (FDX)  447   36   8 
Griffin (Atlanta), GA  0   7   142 
Roanoke, VA (CHEP USA)  8   0   0 
Orion, MI  215   51   0 
Chattanooga, TN  0   20   210 
Bedford Heights (Cleveland), OH  0   6   378 
Punta Gorda, FL  0   0   0 
Cocoa, FL  0   0   0 
Orlando, FL  0   36   0 
Topeka, KS  0   0   0 
Memphis, TN  0   (21)  1,499 
Houston, TX  30   28   0 
Carrollton (Dallas), TX  2   548   128 

150117
Table of Contents

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III, (CONT’D)

SEPTEMBER 30, 20182021

(in thousands)

(1)Reconciliation (cont’d)

  2018  2017  2016 
          
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH $-0-  $-0-  $-0- 
Corpus Christi, TX  36,417   7,413   -0- 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  -0-   4,200   (13,611)
Waco, TX  -0-   5,210   -0- 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  -0-   -0-   31,497 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  -0-   -0-   9,412,120 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Green Bay, WI  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Tulsa, OK  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  -0-   40,000   48,136 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  -0-   -0-   5,355 
Altoona, PA  14,316   -0-   18,650 
Spring (Houston), TX  10,598   -0-   56,275 
Indianapolis, IN  497,710   1,060,372   -0- 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  -0-   -0-   4,950 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  29,050   6,500   -0- 
Kansas City, MO  329,024   51,226   -0- 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Ground)  3,612   86,136   -0- 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  4,587,760   -0-   -0- 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN  -0-   11,680   15,817 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Cincinnati, OH  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  -0-   -0-   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  -0-   1,068,900   31,975,897 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  -0-   -0-   18,410,000 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  -0-   -0-   19,950,000 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  -0-   17,867   30,210,680 
Colorado Springs, CO  820,066   -0-   28,500,000 
Louisville, KY  -0-   -0-   11,304,000 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  -0-   -0-   37,780,000 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  -0-   -0-   31,737,000 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  -0-   34,850,000   -0- 
Ft. Myers, FL  40,635   21,623,000   -0- 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  -0-   31,654,985   -0- 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  -0-   49,880,493   -0- 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  -0-   21,040,396   -0- 
Homestead (Miami), FL  -0-   37,873,120   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  -0-   8,728,439   -0- 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  -0-   40,043,145   -0- 
Kenton, OH  -0-   17,881,608   -0- 
Stow, OH  -0-   18,934,065   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  21,519,411   -0-   -0- 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  29,878,942   -0-   -0- 
Savannah, GA  56,025,945   -0-   -0- 
Daytona Beach, FL  29,973,199   -0-   -0- 
Mobile, AL  33,052,316   -0-   -0- 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  46,576,380   -0-   -0- 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  60,227,134   -0-   -0- 
Total Additions $287,661,885  $286,678,233  $230,251,490 
Total Disposals  -0-   (5,157,126)  -0- 
Balance – End of Year $1,719,578,419  $1,431,916,534  $1,150,395,427 

(A)(1)This property was sold on June 1, 2018.Reconciliation (cont’d)

  2021  2020  2019 
          
Ft. Mill (Charlotte, NC), SC $0  $0  $(10)
Lebanon (Nashville), TN  0   0   0 
Rockford, IL (Sherwin-Williams Co.)  0   0   0 
Edinburg, TX  0   0   0 
Streetsboro (Cleveland), OH  0   0   0 
Corpus Christi, TX  0   0   0 
Halfmoon (Albany), NY  1,014   202   0 
Lebanon (Cincinnati), OH  0   102   0 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Anda Pharmaceuticals)  0   0   0 
Oklahoma City, OK (FDX Ground)  0   19   21 
Waco, TX  0   0   0 
Livonia (Detroit), MI  8   0   118 
Olive Branch (Memphis, TN), MS (Milwaukee Tool)  0   0   0 
Roanoke, VA (FDX Ground)  0   0   0 
Green Bay, WI  10   0   0 
Stewartville (Rochester), MN  8   0   4 
Tulsa, OK  0   0   0 
Buckner (Louisville), KY  0   0   0 
Edwardsville (Kansas City), KS (International Paper)  0   0   0 
Altoona, PA  0   (4)  4 
Spring (Houston), TX  0   12   22 
Indianapolis, IN  0   0   0 
Sauget (St. Louis, MO), IL  2,204   0   0 
Lindale (Tyler), TX  2,338   0   0 
Kansas City, MO  0   0   23 
Frankfort (Lexington), KY  0   0   0 
Jacksonville, FL (FDX Groun d)  0   99   91 
Monroe (Cincinnati), OH  0   0   4,052 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (ULTA)  8   253   0 
Ft. Worth (Dallas), TX  29   287   32 
Cincinnati, OH  0   0   0 
Rockford, IL (Collins Aerospace Systems)  0   0   0 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  0   9   0 
Covington (New Orleans), LA  0   0   16 
Imperial (Pittsburgh), PA  26   0   14 
Burlington (Seattle/Everett), WA  0   49   92 
Colorado Springs, CO  0   0   0 
Louisville, KY  0   0   0 
Davenport (Orlando), FL  3   304   0 
Olathe (Kansas City), KS  3,621   89   0 
Hamburg (Buffalo), NY  8   38   244 
Ft. Myers, FL  0   21   0 
Walker (Grand Rapids), MI  0   0   0 
Mesquite (Dallas), TX  0   0   0 
Aiken (Augusta, GA), SC  0   0   0 
Homestead (Miami), FL  0   0   38 
Oklahoma City, OK (Bunzl)  0   0   0 
Concord (Charlotte), NC  0   0   0 
Kenton, OH  0   0   849 
Stow, OH  0   0   0 
Charleston, SC (FDX)  19   0   0 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon)  0   0   0 

151118
Table of Contents

SIGNATURESMONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III, (CONT’D)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(in thousands)

(1)Reconciliation (cont’d)
  2021  2020  2019 
          
Savannah, GA (Shaw) $0  $0  $0 
Daytona Beach, FL  593   272   35 
Mobile, AL  0   0   0 
Charleston, SC (FDX Ground)  0   0   0 
Braselton (Atlanta), GA  10   0   0 
Trenton, NJ  0   0   83,988 
Savannah, GA (FDX Ground)  0   0   27,532 
Lafayette, IN  0   0   25,079 
Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN (Amazon)  0   79,364   0 
Lancaster (Columbus), OH  0   17,558   0 
Whitsett (Greensboro), NC  0   46,711   0 
Ogden (Salt Lake City), UT  0   12,667   0 
Oklahoma City, OK (Amazon II)  0   14,963   0 
Plain City (Columbus), OH  71,742   0   0 
Locust Grove (Atlanta), GA  93,236   0   0 
Burlington, VT  53,825   0   0 
Kodak (Knoxville), TN  33,890   0   0 
Shopping Center            
Somerset, NJ  0   9   18 
Total Additions $265,123  $177,346  $146,940 
Total Disposals  (5,297)  0   0 
Balance – End of Year $2,303,690  $2,043,864  $1,866,518 

119
Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
(registrant)
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Michael P. Landy
Michael P. Landy, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director, its principal executive officer
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Kevin S. Miller
Kevin S. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, its principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Eugene W. Landy
Eugene W. Landy, Chairman of the Board and Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Michael P. Landy
Michael P. Landy, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Kevin S. Miller
Kevin S. Miller, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Kiernan Conway
Kiernan Conway, Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Daniel D. Cronheim
Daniel D. Cronheim, Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Catherine B. Elflein
Catherine B. Elflein, Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Brian H. Haimm
Brian H. Haimm, Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Neal Herstik
Neal Herstik, Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Matthew I. Hirsch
Matthew I. Hirsch, Director

Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Samuel A. Landy
Samuel A. Landy, Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Gregory T. Otto
Gregory T. Otto, Director
Date: November 28, 201812, 2021By:/s/ Sonal Pande
Sonal Pande, Director
Date: November 12, 2021By:/s/ Scott L. Robinson
Scott L. Robinson, Director
Date: November 28, 2018By:/s/ Stephen B. Wolgin
Stephen B. Wolgin, Director

120