UNITED STATES

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

FORM 10-K

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017December 31, 2022

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________

Commission File No. 001-10171

DALA PETROLEUM CORP.

(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   oYes xNo

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  oYes xNo

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. xYesoNo

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrantRegistrant was required to submit and post such files). xYesoNo

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Our website is KonaTel.com.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. o

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the Registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the Registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). oYes xNo

On March 31, 2017,June 30, 2022, the last business day of the Registrant’sRegistrant’s most recently completed second quarter, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $146,324,$29,362,185 based upon 20,390,406 shares of the Registrant’s common stock being currently owned by such persons, and based upon the closing price on that date of the common stock of the Registrant on the OTC Markets Group, (“OTCLLC (the “OTC Markets”) “OTCQB“OTC Pink Tier” system(“KTEL”) of $0.05. For purposes of this response, the Registrant has assumed that its directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of 5% or more of its common stock$1.44 per share on March 31, 2017, were deemed “affiliates” of the Registrant.June 30, 2022.

As of January 30, 2018,December 31, 2022, the Registrant had 27,192,28642,240,406 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value, issued and outstanding.

Explanatory NoteREFERENCES

On December 18, 2017 (the “Effective Time”), we completed an Agreement and Plan of Merger between our newly formed and wholly-owned acquisition subsidiary, and KonaTel, Inc., a Nevada corporation (respectively, “KonaTel” the “KonaTel Merger Agreement”), whereby at the Effective Time, KonaTel was the surviving corporation and became our wholly-owned subsidiary (the “KonaTel Merger”).  Following the Merger, our primary operations will be those currently carried on by KonaTel.  Additional information about the KonaTel Merger is contained in our 8-KA-1 Current Report dated November 15, 2017, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 20, 2017 (the “KonaTel Merger 8-K”), and is incorporated herein by reference and available by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15 hereof.  Under the KonaTel Merger Agreement, we changed our fiscal year end from September 30, 2017, to a calendar year end; accordingly, we will be filing a 10-K Transition Report for the year ended December 31, 2017.  Except as required by SEC Regulation S-K, and to the extent we believe additional information will be helpful in an understanding of the information presented herein, all disclosures in this 10-K Annual Report relate primarily to our business, affairs and related matters through September 30, 2017.

Cautionary Statements

We have a limited public float of 1,692,286 shares of our outstanding common stock, and there has been no established trading market in our common stock during the past three years. See generally, the caption “Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters” of Part II, Item 5 hereof, for additional information regarding these matters. These factors, along with the closing of the KonaTel Merger, may result in uncertainty and volatility in the trading price of our common stock that may not have any relation to our current or future prospects.  Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Markets “OTC Pink Tier” under the trading symbol “DALP.”  On or about September 29, 2017, our application for continued quotations of our common stock on the OTC Markets OTCQB Tier was not approved because of our limited public float and the high concentration of ownership in our common stock in one entity at the time of our renewal application.  See Part III, Item 12 hereof, for information about our controlling shareholders.  No further application can be made by us to the OTC Markets for consideration of quotations of our common stock on the OCTQB Tier for at least six months from the denial of our September 29, 2017, application, or on or about March 31, 2018.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

In this Annual Report, references to “Dala Petroleum Corp.“KonaTel, Inc.,” “Dala,“KonaTel,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,“our,” “our”“us” and words of similar import, refer to KonaTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, formerly named Dala Petroleum Corp., which is the Registrant, and where applicable, our wholly-owned subsidiary, KonaTel.wholly owned subsidiaries, KonaTel, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“KonaTel Nevada”), Apeiron Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Apeiron Systems” or “Apeiron”), IM Telecom, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company doing business as “Infiniti Mobile” (sometimes called “IM Telecom” or “Infiniti Mobile”).

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the following words: “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time the statements are made and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report. We cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate, and therefore, prospective investors are encouraged not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. You should carefully read this Annual Report completely, and it should be read and considered with all other reports filed by us with the SEC.United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

Summaries of all agreements or other documents referenced herein and attached hereto by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15, or otherwise, do not purport to be all inclusive of the terms, conditions and other provisions of such agreements or documents, and accordingly, all such summaries are modified in their entirety to the referenced and Hyperlinked respective agreement or document in Part IV, Item 15 hereof.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

THE COMPANY CORPORATE HISTORY AND BUSINESSCorporate History and Business Development

We were incorporated as “Light Tech, Inc.” under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 24, 1984.  A subsidiary in the name “Westcott Products Corporation” was organized by us under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 24, 1986, for the purpose of changing our name and domicile to the State of Delaware. On June 27, 1986, we merged with the Delaware subsidiary, with the survivor being Westcott Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation.   AllAt that time, all of our prior operations were conducted through Lee Building Products and T. A. Kilgore & Company, which owned and operated a home center in League City, Texas, about 30 miles southeast of downtown Houston, Texas. During 1990, we ceased allthese operations, and the secured lenders took possession of allour assets.

We changed our name to “Dala Petroleum Corp.” on August 29, 2014; and then to “KonaTel, Inc.” on February 5, 2018, following the closing of its assets.two respective mergers that are discussed below.

On March 11, 2000, our Board of Directors began the process of re-entering the development stage, with the appointment of new officers and directors, and began the process of seeking the acquisition of new business opportunities. These efforts resulted in the completion of the acquisition ofon June 2, 2014, we completed a merger with Dala Petroleum Corp., a Nevada Corporation (“Dalacorporation (respectively, “Dala Nevada”), pursuant to a transaction that is more specifically described below.

On June 2, 2014, we and our newly formed and wholly-owned subsidiary, Dala Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Dala Acquisition”the “Dala Merger”), and. Dala Nevada which was wholly-ownedwholly owned by Chisholm Partners II, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company (“Chisholm II”), executed and delivered an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Dala Merger Agreement”) and all required or necessary documentation to complete the merger (collectively, the “Dala Merger Transaction Documents”), whereby Dala Acquisition merged with and into Dala Nevada, with Dala Nevada being the surviving company and becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary on the closing of the merger (the “Dala Merger”). Articles of Merger were filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on such date, which was the effective date of the Dala Merger.  We issued 10,000,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Dala Nevada, to Dala Nevada’s sole shareholder. Following the receipt of the 10,000,000 shares, Chisholm II’s managing director approved the transfer of all of these shares to its members (or its members’ designees) on a pro rata basis. The transfer of shares to the members of Chisholm II occurred on June 8, 2014.  A condition precedent to the closing of the Dala Merger was that we would raise no less than $2,000,000 (the “Offering”) from persons who were “accredited investors” in consideration of the issuance (or the conversion) of a minimum of 2,000 shares and up to a maximum of 2,500 shares of our Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock at the offering price of $1,000 per Unit. Upon the closing of the Offering, we sold 2,025 Units in the Offering, raising $2,025,000, which funds were planned to be utilized in the development of the 300 oil and gas leases we acquired in north central Kansas under the Dala Merger, with total leased acreage of approximately 80,000 acres, more or less. For additional information about the Dala Merger, see our 8-K Current Report dated June 2, 2014, and filed with the SEC on June 3, 2014, which is accessible by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15 hereof.

On July 24, 2014, we filed an S-1 Registration Statement to register shares of common stock underlying the conversion rights of our Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock, which became effective on September 12, 2014.

On August 29, 2014, we filed a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware changing our name to “Dala Petroleum Corp.,” as approved by a majority of the common shareholders and 67% of our preferred shareholders.

Since the time of the Dala Merger, we have been operatingoperated as an early-stage oil exploration company focused on theour leased acreage which has oil potential at depths of less than 6,000 feet. We assigned the rights to explore the leased acreage toacquired by Dala Nevada until 2016, when Chisholm II which is an exploration and production company focused on the acquisition of Kansas oil leasehold interests and exploration and development and was Dala Nevada’s sole shareholder prior to the Dala Merger.

In June 2015, we temporarily suspended or exploration program due to the decline in the price of oil and difficult market conditions. During our fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, we did not drill any wells.  

We established a land position over a shallow, conventional oil play in north central Kansas.  The “Play” or exploration concept was located across a four county area and was geographically defined by the boundaries of the productive North American Rift System.  The land position is concentrated over a lightly explored portion of the rift, bordered immediately on the south by productive rift-related oil fields, and to the north by significant new discoveries in southeast Nebraska, where productive rates had then been reported.  This Play concept was developed by a team of highly experienced international geologists, geophysicists and land experts, who applied regional geologic theory, proprietary geophysical databases and high resolution seismic data.

4

On May 16, 2016, we entered into a Partial Cancellation Agreement (the “PCA”) by and among our subsidiary, Dala Nevada, Chisholm II and certain members of Chisholm II (the “Chisholm Members”) through which Chisholm II (after receiving shares from certain of its Chisholm Members) returned a total of 8,567,800 shares of the 10,000,000 shares of our common stock exchanged under the Dala Merger to us for cancellation.  Incancellation in exchange for the returnour assignment of these shares for cancellation, we assignedapproximately 55,000 acres, more or less, of our leased acreage (approximatelyor approximately 68.75% of our total holdings)holdings, to Chisholm II. Additionally, on May 16, 2016, our Board of Directors, as part of a settlement with our Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock shareholders, authorized the filing of an Amended and Restated Certificate of DesignationAll of our Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock (the “COD”), which (i) changed the conversion price of such preferred stock from $0.70 per share to $0.05 per share,remaining oil and (ii) eliminated Section 7 “Certain Adjustments” of the COD. For additional information about the PCAgas leasehold interests, comprising leases covering approximately 7,489 and these settlement arrangements with our Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock shareholders, see our 8-K Current Report dated May 16, 2016,403 acres, more or less, expired in 2017 and filed with the SEC on May 27, 2016, which is accessible by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15 hereof.2018, respectively.

On May 10, 2016, we terminated our Master Services Agreement with Chisholm II and all amounts due thereunder were released by Chisholm II. For additional information about the termination of this Master Service Agreement, see our 8-K Current Report dated May 10, 2016, and filed with the SEC on May 17, 2016, which is accessible by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15 hereof.

On July 20, 2017, pursuant to a Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 19, 2017, M2 Equity Partners, LLC, a privately held Minnesota limited liability company (“M2”), acquired 12,100,000 shares of our common stock in consideration of the sum of $347,500,$367,500, which resulted in a change in control of our Company.  As part of this transaction, substantially all of our outstanding liabilities were paid or compromised, and 1,584,200 shares of our common stock, 2008 shares of our Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock, which comprised all of this outstanding series of preferred stock, and 1,928,571 warrants that were issued in connection with the issuance of such series of preferred stock, were cancelled. For additional information about the closing of this Common Stock Purchase Agreement, see our 8-K Current Report dated July 19,

On November 13, 2017, and filed with the SEC on July 20, 2017, which is accessible by Hyperlink in Part IV, Item 15 hereof.

We estimate that we had leases with landowners on approximately 7,892 acres, more or less, at June 30, 2017; approximately 3,744, acres at September 30, 2017; and presently, approximately 1,290 acres.

Prior to the expiration of the leases on all but approximately 1,290 acres of our leasehold interests in mid-November, 2017, we have been evaluating these leasehold interests for several months to determine their present value and future potential for exploration, with the intention of contacting property owners and oil and gas operators active in the area of our current and expired leasehold interests to determine whether there is potential future value to us in retaining, renewing or acquiring other leasehold interests with the prospect of entering into favorable arrangements with oil and gas operators that are active in these areas to develop these properties as part of a coalition of landowners, leaseholders and operators, if and when economically feasible. These activities may include seeking others with an interest in funding the development, extension and renewal of leases or the acquisition of other leases, either singly or with a joint venture partner or with a working interest, carried or fully funded by any such partner or other oil and gas operator.  We are in the process of contacting current and former parties to our leased acreage, as well commencing the process of identifying oil and gas operators conducting development activities in this area of north Kansas; and we have received permission from Chisholm II to contact all landowners who were lessors of the leased acreage assigned to Chisholm II under the PCA referenced above. It is highly likely that that our current oil and gas industry activities will become secondary to those operations assumed by our acquisition of KonaTel; however, management has expressed its intention to maximize the value of our present oil and gas leased acreage and our substantial geologic, proprietary geophysical database and high resolution seismic data information for the mutual benefit of the Company and our shareholders, to the extent that these activities do not adversely affect the benefits of the KonaTel acquisition in any reasonable respect.  Since formulating this plan for a coalition, we have made our initial contacts to approximately 140 landowners with whom we hold or have held oil and gas leases; and depending upon the responses we receive from the pre-paid post cards enclosed with our letters to these landowners, we intend to contact other landowners and oil and gas operators in the northern Kansas of our leased area concerning this planned coalition.

Regardless of the foregoing business activities since 2014, we may be deemed to have been a “shell company” prior to the KonaTel Merger, which would require that holders of any shares of our outstanding common stock that comprise “restricted securities” may be limited to resales of their respective shares under the provisions of subparagraph (i) of Rule 144 or Section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act.  For additional information in this respect, see the heading “Shell Companies” of the caption “Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters” of Part II, Item 5 hereof.

All of our designated series of shares of preferred stock have been converted, reacquired or cancelled. Accordingly, we filed an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware, on November 13, 2017, which removed all of the designations of our designated series of preferred stock from our Certificate of Incorporation, while reserving our 50,000,000 authorized and unissued $0.01 millone cent ($0.01) par value shares of preferred stock for future issuance as the Board of Directors may designate and approve. A copy of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is filed as an Exhibit to this Current Report.  See Part IV, Item 15, hereof.Exhibit 3(i).

Effective December 18, 2017, we completed an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “KonaTel Merger Agreement”) with KonaTel Nevada, under which KonaTel Nevada became our wholly owned subsidiary on the closing of the merger (the “KonaTel Nevada Merger”), and we succeeded to the business operations of KonaTel Nevada.

Effective February 7, 2018 (dated as of February 5, 2018), we entered into an Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Membership Interest (the “PSMI”), with the transaction documents being deposited in escrow on February 7, 2018, respecting the acquisition of 100% of the membership interest in IM Telecom, doing business as “Infiniti Mobile,” from its sole owner, Trevan Morrow (“Mr. Morrow”).  The principal asset of IM Telecom, at that time, was a “Lifeline Program” license of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) (an FCC approved wireless Compliance Plan).

On November 29, 2017,August 9, 2018, we filedentered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Telecon Wireless Agreement”) with Telecon Wireless Resources, Inc., a Post-Effective Amendment toNew York corporation (the “Telecon Wireless”), whereby we sold various assets, including furniture, fixtures, equipment, account receivable and a customer list, among other assets and liabilities.

Effective December 31, 2018, we completed an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Apeiron Systems (the “Apeiron Systems Merger Agreement”), under which Apeiron Systems became our registration statement that became effectivewholly owned subsidiary on September 12, 2014, regarding the registrationclosing of the shares of common stock underlying our Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock, withdrawing from registration all shares that had not been converted, amounting to 1,949,333 shares.  Only 17 of our 2025 shares of such series of preferred stock had been converted, and the remaining shares of such series were cancelled under the above referenced Common Stock Purchase Agreement with M2.  This Post-Effective Amendment was declared effective on December 1, 2017.

The KonaTel Merger was effective on December 18, 2017.merger (the “Apeiron Systems Merger”).  We issued 13,500,0007,000,000 shares of our $0.001 mill par value common stock comprised of “restricted securities” as defined in SEC Rule 144 in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of common stock of KonaTel. Post-KonaTel Merger,Apeiron Systems, its two (2) shareholders, Joshua Ploude (6,300,000 shares) and except as discussed below aboutVyacheslav Yanson (700,000 shares), pro rata, in accordance with their respective equity interests in Apeiron Systems. Closing conditions to the closingApeiron Systems Merger Agreement included, among other conditions, that the Apeiron Systems shareholders would have a $1.00 per share “Guaranteed Value” on the KonaTel shares they received under the Apeiron Systems Merger, if the KonaTel shares exchanged did not trade at or above $1.00 for ten (10) consecutive days during the period commencing on

December 31, 2020, and ending December 31, 2021, on the applicable trading market for our common stock during that period, and subject to such shares being continuously owned of record by the Apeiron Systems shareholders, all as outlined in Section 5.10 of the Apeiron Systems Merger thereAgreement. This condition was fully satisfied effective June 16, 2021.

On April 14, 2020, our operating subsidiaries made loan applications to participate in the Small Business Administration’s (the “SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) created under the “Cares Act” as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 15, 2020, the loan applications of Apeiron Systems, IM Telecom and KonaTel Nevada were approximately 27,192,286 outstandingapproved and loan proceeds in the amounts of $101,800, $20,900 and $186,300, respectively, were received. We followed all prescribed loan forgiveness guidelines provided by our local bank and the SBA by using these loan proceeds to fund employee payroll through the 60-day period ending on June 15, 2020. All PPP loans were forgiven by the SBA in 2021.

On December 14, 2020, the shares of our common stock 13,500,000 shares of which are owned by D. Sean McEwen, who was the sole shareholder of KonaTel and a partywere approved for up listing to the KonaTel Merger Agreement; 12,100,000 shares of which are ownedOTC Markets OTCQB® Venture Market (“OTCQB Tier”). OTCQB is a venture market operated by M2 (Messrs. Mark Savage and Matthew Atkinson are members of M2 and collectively own approximately 66.1% of M2, which equates to an indirect beneficial ownership of approximately 4,000,000 shares of our common stock each, and with Mr. Atkinson being the sole Manager of M2, he is alsoOTC Markets. To be eligible for quotation on the present beneficial owner of all of M2’s shares of our common stock; and 1,692,286 shares, which are owned by public shareholders.  M2 and Messrs. Savage and Atkinson were also parties to the KonaTel Merger Agreement, and Mr. Savage was our President and a director; and Mr. Atkinson was our Secretary.  See Part III, Items 10 and 12 hereof.  The following additional actions were taken at the closingOTCQB, companies must be current in their reporting obligations under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Merger, through the executionExchange Act and delivery of various additional agreements among the partiesundergo an annual verification and others,management certification process. Companies must also meet a minimum bid price test and which were conditions precedent to the closing :

·

the execution and delivery of a Stock Option Cancellation Agreementother financial conditions. The OTC Markets is recognized by the sole option holder of shares of KonaTel (Exhibit 5.4(c)SEC as a “Qualified Interdealer Quotation System” (“IDQS”) under SEC Rule 15c2-11(e)(6); and the OTCQB is an established public market that provides current public information to the KonaTel Merger Agreement);investors that need to analyze, value and trade securities.

·

the assumption of the Employment Agreements of two key employees of KonaTel (Section 6.4(b) of the KonaTel Merger Agreement [for additional information, see the heading “Significant Employees” of the caption “Directors and Executive Officers” of Part III, Item 10 hereof]);

·

the execution and delivery of an Employment Agreement with Mr. McEwen, employing him as the President, Chairman of the Board and a director (Exhibit 6.4(c) to the KonaTel Merger Agreement [for additional information, see the heading “McEwen Employment Agreement” of the caption “Executive Compensation” of Part III, Item 10 hereof]);

·

the execution and delivery of a Shareholder Voting Agreement betweenOn August 25, 2021, the Company Mr. Savage, Mr. Atkinson, M2 and Mr. McEwen whereby Mr. McEwen was granted an irrevocable proxy coupled with an interest from each of the foregoing, together with the following rights, including a right of veto, for a period of two (2) years, on the following matters: (i) an increase in the compensation of any employee of the Company by more than $20,000 in any one calendar year and for these purposes, the term compensation includes any form of remuneration or monetary benefit; (ii) the issuance of stock, the creation of a new class of stock, the grant of options or warrants, modification of any shareholder, option holder or warrant holder’s rights, grants, conversion rights or the taking of any other action that directly or indirectly dilutes the outstanding securities of the Company, excepting a current private placement of common stock of the Company for an equity funding of $1,300,000 through the offer and sale of 6,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock solely to “accredited investors”; (iii) the issuance of debt in excess of $100,000 in the aggregate in any one calendar year; (iv) the approval of a plan of merger, reorganization or conversion; (v) the sale, transfer or other conveyance of assets of the Company having an aggregate value in excess of $100,000 in any one calendar year, other than in the ordinary course of the business; (vi) the entry into a contract or other transaction having a total aggregate contractual liability for the Company in excess of $100,000 in any one calendar year; (vii) any change in the Bylaws of the Company modifying these requirements (all of which are included in our Amended and Restated Bylaws filed as an Exhibit herewith [see Part IV, Item 15, Exhibit 3(ii)]); and (viii) that Mr. McEwen be named as a “nominee” to the Board of Directors of the Company at any special or annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders to elect members to the Board of Directors and to vote all proxies provided to management in connection with any such meeting for Mr. McEwen as one of the “nominees” to our Board of Directors, so long as Mr. McEwen owns 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, among other provisions. The Shareholder Voting Agreement also provides, however, that if Mr. McEwen has been removed as a director for cause by our shareholders and such removal has been confirmed by a Delaware court of competent jurisdiction under Delaware Law, this “nominee” provision shall not be enforceable by Mr. McEwen and shall be void (Exhibit 6.4(d) to the KonaTel Merger Agreement [for additional information, see the heading “Shareholder Voting Agreement” of the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” of Part III, Item 10 hereof]);

·

the reservation of 5,000,000 shares of our authorized common stock for issuance to directors, executive officers and employees, as incentives or bonuses, and the granting of an aggregate of 3,850,000 of those options at the Closing of the Merger, including grants to Messrs. Savage, Atkinson, Mr. McEwen and the two key employees whose Employment Agreements were assumed by the Company at the Closing of the Merger (Exhibit 6.4(e) to the KonaTel Merger Agreement [the “Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement”]); and for additional information, see the heading “Outstanding Equity Awards” of the caption “Executive Compensation” of Part III, Item 10 hereof;

·

the execution and delivery of a Lock-Up/Leak-Out Agreement by Mr. Savage, Mr. Atkinson, M2 and Mr. McEwen respecting the resale of their respective shares of common stock beneficially owned or subsequently acquired in the Company covering an 18 month period commencing at the Closing of the Merger (Exhibit 6.4(f) to the Merger Agreement [the “Form of the Lock-Up/Leak-Out Agreement]); and for additional information, see the heading “Lock-Up/Leak-Out Agreements” of the caption “Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters” of Part II, Item 5 hereof; and

·

the adoption of Amended and Restated Bylaws.

See Part IV, Item 15, for reference to the filed Exhibits that are briefly summarized above.  These summaries do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety to the complete text of such Exhibits.

At the Effective Time, we changed our fiscal year from September 30 to a calendar year end of December 31 to coincide with the calendar fiscal year end of KonaTel.

We will use our “best efforts” to complete the above referenced equity funding and to file a registration statement with the SEC withinon Form S-8 to register 5,901,884 shares of its common stock reserved for grant underlying the Company’s 2018 Incentive Stock Option Plan (year designation reflects a reasonable time of the availability of the required auditedchange to a calendar year end in 2017).

On June 14, 2022, we and reviewed financial statements ofour wholly owned subsidiaries, Apeiron Systems and IM Telecom, entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “NPA”) with CCUR Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CCUR”), as “Collateral Agent”; and CCUR and Symbolic Logic, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Symbolic”), as “Purchasers,” along with a related Guarantee and Security Agreement (the “GSA”), whereby the Company and KonaTel,its subsidiary companies pledged their assets (including the Company’s equity ownership of its subsidiaries) to register a reasonable portionsecure $3,150,000 (the “Principal Amount”) in debt financing payable in one (1) year (cannot be repaid prior to nine (9) months), together with interest at the rate of 15% per annum (the “Interest Rate”), with two (2) successive six (6) month optional extensions (the “Loan”). For additional information on the outstanding shares ofNPA and related transactions, see our common stock that are deemed to be “restricted securities” on a pro rata basis for resale by Company shareholders who are non-“affiliates,” with the primary purpose thereof being to increase the public float of our outstanding shares. A portion of our shares of common stock owned by our “affiliates” may also be included in any such registration statement, with all of such shares being subject to pro rata cutbacks by the SEC under SEC Rule 415 or otherwise. Substantially all of these shares are or will be subject to the Lock-Up/Leak-Out Agreement referenced above, though the “Lock-Up Period” for any shares included in an effective registration statement will cease, while the provisions of the “Leak-Out Period” contained therein shall continue to apply during the 18 month term of the Lock-Up/Leak-Out Agreement.

Following the Merger, our primary operations will be those currently carried on by KonaTel. For information about our current8-K Current Report dated June 14, 2022, and expired oil and gas leasehold interests and the area of north central Kansas where these leaseholder interest are located, including maps, see Part I, Item I, of our 10-K Annual Report for fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, filed with the SEC on January 13, 2017,June 21, 2022, which is incorporated hereinavailable by referenceHyperlink in Part IV, Item 15 hereof; and see the discussion above about our present plans and our current activities regarding the existing, expired and other leasehold interests in this area.

hereof.

On January 8, 2017, weJuly 7, 2022, the Company filed a Definitive Information Statementregistration statement with the SEC on Form S-8 to change our nameregister an additional 2,000,000 shares of its common stock reserved for grant underlying the Company’s 2018 Incentive Stock Option Plan.

On August 22, 2022, the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC on Form S-8 to “KonaTel, Inc.”  See Part IV, Item 15 hereof.decrease its shares registered on Form S-8 by 1,500,000 shares; and on March 20, 2023, filed a similar amendment on Form S-8 to decrease the shares registered by 253,764 shares, leaving 6,148,120 remaining registered shares with 1,648,120 shares having been issued and 4,500,000 reserved shares for future issuance under granted or to be granted incentive stock options.

KONATEL BUSINESS

Introduction

KonaTel Nevada was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 14, 2014, by its founder and then sole shareholder, D. Sean McEwen, our current Chairman and CEO, to conduct the business of a full servicefull-service cellular provider that deliversdelivered cellular products and services to individual and business customers in various retail and wholesale markets. Through its sales network, it providesprovided these services nationwide. In furtherance of its proposed business, on November 1, 2014, it acquired most of the assets of Coast to Coast Cellular, Inc. (“Coast to Coast”), including inventories, property, plant and equipment and goodwillits customer list, all valued at approximately $950,000 net of liabilities in the approximate amount of $415,000; and on November 1, 2016, it acquired the assets of CS Agency LLC (“CS Agency”), consisting of contract rights related to the cellular industry, in consideration of assuming liabilities of CS Agency in the approximate amount of $300,000. With the completion of the KonaTel Nevada Merger, we succeeded to the current and intended business operations of KonaTel Nevada.

KonaTel’s cellular industry segment operations currently comprise mostly “Wholesale Mobile Voice,” which includes wholesale priced minutes, textOn December 31, 2018, we acquired Apeiron Systems (www.apeiron.io). Apeiron was organized in 2013 and data to mobile resellers; “B2B Mobile Voice (agents),” which includes traditional post-paid cellularis an international hosted services primarily acquired from Verizon Communications Inc.Platform as a Service (“Verizon”CPaaS”) provider that designed, built, owns and operates its national private core network, supporting a suite of business communications services, all accessible via proprietary Applications Programming Interfaces (“APIs”). As an FCC licensed Internet Telephony Service Provider (“ITSP”), soldApeiron also holds an FCC numbering authority license. Some of Apeiron’s hosted services include Voice over IP (“VoIP”), cellular and Over-The-Top (“OTT”) telephony, SMS/MMS messaging and broadcast services, numbering features, including Cloud IVRs, Voicemail, Fax, Call Recording and other services through local, toll-free and international phone numbers. Supported by its national redundant network, Apeiron also provides public and private IP network services, including Multiprotocol Label Switching (“MPLS”), Dedicated Internet and LTE Wireless WAN solutions. Apeiron’s cloud services include Information Data Dips, Software-Defined Wide Area Networking (“SD-WAN”) and Internet of Things (“IoT”) data and device management. Apeiron primarily distributes its services nationally through its website, its sales staff, independent sales agents and Independent Sales Organizations (“ISOs”).

Apeiron Systems is headquartered in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, where it has customer service and software engineering resources staffed. Additional development resources are staffed out of Los Angeles, CA, as well as in Europe and Asia.

On February 5, 2018, we entered into a purchase agreement to smallacquire IM Telecom (www.infinitimobile.com). On October 23, 2018, the FCC approved our acquisition of IM Telecom, and medium sized businesseson January 31, 2019, we completed the purchase of IM Telecom. IM Telecom operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of KonaTel. It is an FCC licensed Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (“ETC”) and marketed through independent commissioned sales agents; “B2B & B2C Retail,”is one of twenty-two (22) original FCC licensed wireless cellular resellers to hold an FCC approved Lifeline Compliance Plan since 2012, of which comprises one retail locationapproximately twelve (12) license holders remain active today. The FCC has not approved (granted) a new wireless reseller Lifeline Compliance Plan since 2012. As a licensed ETC, IM Telecom is currently authorized to distribute Lifeline subsidized mobile voice/data service in upstateten (10) states, which are Vermont, South Carolina, Georgia, Maryland, Kentucky, Wisconsin, Oklahoma, California, New York that functions as a Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”) reseller of cellular services and products, primarily selling B2C Retail Service, and which also sells Verizon service from that location, mostly consisting of B2B Mobile Service; and “Internet of Things” or wireless data (“IoT”), an untapped area of KonaTel.  The Internet of things is the network of physical devices, vehicles and other items embedded with electronics, software, sensors and network connectivity, which enable these objects to collect and exchange data.  Each “thing” is uniquely identifiable through its embedded computing system, but is able to interoperate within the existing Internet infrastructure. KonaTel plans to devote additional resources to IoT and has direct wholesale mobile data agreements with Verizon and AT&T, Inc. (“AT&T”) to provide it with wireless data services.  Many of the services provided by KonaTel are contracted from aggregators or Mobile Virtual Network Enablers (“MVNEs”) that are wholesale distributors of these services, like Telispire of Wichita Falls, Texas (“Telispire”), which provides nationwide access to trusted wireless networks; and Orbcomm Inc., of Rochelle Park, New Jersey (“Orbcomm” [NASDAQ-“ORBC”]), a global provider of IoT solutions.Nevada. In addition to KonaTel’s current wholesaleLifeline, IM Telecom is also an FCC licensed Affordable Connectivity Program (“ACP”) provider, authorized to distribute ACP subsidized high-speed mobile data agreements with Verizon, AT&Tservice in the fifty (50) states plus Washington D.C. and others, KonaTel has also developed its own IoT software suite, “CROSS” system, for provisioning or activating and managing mobile devices, which allows it to resell mobile data singly, and which a sub-reseller customer of KonaTel may require in providing these services to customers; and “Lifeline (virtual),” which KonaTel recently commenced marketing as a virtual eligible telecommunications carrier (“VETC”) of “Lifeline services” in California under the license of an eligible telecommunications carrier or “ETC.”  This initiative was implemented by KonaTel as a precursor to eventually purchasing a licensed Lifeline ETC so it can market these services directly in various markets where it may be licensed to provide these services.Puerto Rico. Lifeline is a Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”)an FCC program that provides subsidized, fixed or mobile telecommunications services to low-income consumers.  KonaTel primarilyAmericans. ACP is an FCC program that provides subsidized high-speed wireless data services to low-income Americans. IM Telecom distributes Lifeline and ACP services under its productsInfiniti Mobile brand name through its website, sales staff, retail locations and ISOs. IM Telecom also offers non-Lifeline and non-ACP services through independent field agents.throughout the United States.IM Telecom has a US-based customer support center located in Atmore, Alabama.

7

KonaTelIM Telecom is headquartered in Plano, Texas, and has facilitiesa warehouse operation in Johnstown, New York (approximately 1,500 square feet), which includesTulsa, Oklahoma, and a sales office and store front business, supervised under an Area Sales Manager, with a total of six employees; Johnstown, Pennsylvania (approximately 7,500 square feet [KonaTel’s former Headquarters]), which is primarily used for accounting, engineering, compliance and the customer service departments of KonaTel’s B2B agent program and its wholesale service providers, and having 11center in Atmore, Alabama.

We are headquartered in Plano, Texas. Apeiron Systems has eight (8) full-time employees; and Dallas, Texas (approximately 3,000 square feet), which is KonaTel’s principal executive offices, and where D. Sean McEwen, the Company’s and KonaTel’s Chairman, and Charles L. Schneider, Jr., KonaTel’s CEO, are located, with threeIM Telecom has (23) full-time employees and onetwo (2) part-time employee. This office houses the VETC operations of KonaTel.  KonaTel maintains a website at www.konatel.com, for easy access to KonaTelemployees; and its products and services.we have four (4) full-time employees.

Principal Products or Services and their Markets

KonaTel’sOur principal products and services, across our two wholly owned subsidiaries, Apeiron Systems and IM Telecom, include itsour CPaaS suite of services (SIP/VoIP, SMS/MMS), wholesale priced minutes, text and retail mobile voice and mobile data to mobile resellers, wireless dataIoT services, its Cross Systemwholesale voice termination services, and our ETC and ACP subsidized services for provisioning or activating and managing mobile devices and its Lifeline (virtual), through which it recently commenced marketing eligible FCC subsidized, fixed or mobile, telecommunications services to low-income consumers through an existing agreement with anAmericans. Except for our ETC in over 20 states.  All of these product offerings are available nationwide, except the Lifeline services from its three current locationsdistributed in Johnstown, New York, Johnstown, Pennsylvaniaup to ten (10) states and Dallas, Texas.

The following areour ACP services distributed in the principal revenue streams of KonaTel

·

The first revenue channel isfifty (50) states, as well as Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico, our voice, text and data MVNO channel.  The MVNO, mobile virtual network operator or retail channel, is a wireless communications services provider that does not own the wireless network infrastructure over which the MVNO provides services to its customers.  The MVNO channel provides KonaTel with the greatest ARPU (average revenue per unit) and the highest gross profit per unit.  The products sold are traditional post-paid wireless plans that include voice, text and data, wireless data only plans, and equipment that support the wireless plans. The equipment includes, but is not limited to, phones, tablets and accessories.  We market the MVNO channel products through our retail store in Johnstown, New York, under the “Telecon Wireless” brand.  These current products are sold to consumers, B2C business to consumer, out of the storefront, and to businesses direct, B2B business to business, by our Area Sales Manager.  We also market ourApeiron Systems’ products and services through independent (commissioned) sales agents through the KonaTel brand.  These agents marketare available worldwide and subject to smallU.S., international and medium sized businesses throughout the United States. This type of marketing is also considered B2B.local/national regulations.

·We generate revenue from two (2) primary sources, Hosted Services and Mobile Services:

The second revenue channel that provides us the greatest revenue is the voice, text and data MNVE channel.  The MVNE, or mobile virtual network enabler, or wholesale channel, provides network infrastructure and related services, such as network subsystems, business support systems, provisioning, administration and operations support systems to MVNOs.  KonaTel provides a suite of services to the MVNOs.  All of our MVNO customers purchase the wireless network service from us and can choose, if they require, any suite of services KonaTel provides.  The services that KonaTel provides include, but are not limited to, customer service, billing service and equipment procurement.

·

The third revenue channel is our Sprint commission channel.  This channel is exclusive to the Johnstown, New York, retail location.  It is a consumer product, and the customer is a Sprint direct customer.  KonaTel receives a commission from Sprint for selling the product.  All products that are sold by a direct Sprint store, including their Boost product, are sold at the Johnstown, New York, location.

·

The fourth revenue channel for us is the VETC, virtual eligible telecommunications carrier, our Lifeline service in California. KonaTel operates under the license an ETC or eligible telecommunications carrier.  We currently market through four master agencies that specialize in Lifeline products.  These master agencies support hundreds of agents who market directly to the individuals requesting Lifeline cellular phone service.  KonaTel provides phones and wireless service to the individual requiring Lifeline service.  This channel is currently KonaTel’s fourth largest revenue producer.

·

Our final revenue channel is relatively new to KonaTel.  It is the IoT or Internet of Things wireless data channel. IoT refers to the ever-growing network of physical objects that feature an IP address for Internet connectivity, and the communication that occurs between these objects and other Internet-enabled devices and systems. KonaTel markets as an IoT B2B MVNO or retailer through the independent agents and an IoT MVNE or distributor.  KonaTel offers the wireless data service to an MVNO or a direct product producer.  The direct product producer may be a company that has developed an IoT product and needs to have a wireless data carrier to make the product work.  Although, this is our newest revenue stream, we expect it to eventually be our largest.

Distribution Methods of the Products or Services

Almost all of KonaTel’s products and services areWe primarily sold through agents and resellers, excepting some sales direct to consumersdistribute our Hosted Services through our single retail location in Johnstown, New York.

8

In New York,website, sales staff, master distribution agreements and ISOs (independent sales agents). We primarily distribute our retail store resells Sprint cellular service (as an agent for Sprint) and sells the Verizon cellular service; we purchase product from Telispire wholesale and repackage the product under our brand name.  Our main business revolves around our Verizon products (Verizon cellular purchased from Telispire and Verizon IoT data purchased directly from Verizon) sold both to consumers, businesses and other resellers.  Recently, KonaTel signed a direct reseller agreement with AT&T to resell their APEX suite of services, a bundle of voice (cellular) and data (IoT) services targeted specifically to businesses (not consumers).

We distribute B2B mobile, IoT and Lifeline servicesMobile Services through independent field agents.  Agents are recruited and obtained to market these services via various means such as tradeshows, our website, word of mouth from other agentssales staff, retail locations and cold calling.  Wholesale mobile and B2C retail services are sold and distributed via direct KonaTel employees.  Wholesale mobile customers are solicited and obtained also via tradeshows,ISOs. Since 2021, we have continued to increase our website, word of mouth within the industry and cold calling.  B2C customers are sold products and services at our Johnstown, New York, retail store location.Mobile Service online marketing efforts to supplement alternative distribution channel growth.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and the Names of Principal Suppliers

Wholesale cellularwireless services are sourced either directly from the wireless carrier or from wholesalers that sit between KonaTelus (Apeiron Systems and IM Telecom) and the wireless carrier. Carriers can include Verizon, T-Mobile and AT&T. Wholesalers can include PWGPrepaid Wireless Group (“PWG”) and Telispire.

Mobile Virtual Network Operator (“MVNOs”)Wireless resellers, like KonaTel or a wireless communications services provider that doesus, traditionally do not own the wireless infrastructure over which it provides services to its customers, are not required to have any licenses with any carrier to do business. KonaTel purchasesprovided. We purchase services from the following sources:

·

Telispire: Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) voice, text or data service.  Telispire, through a contract with KonaTel, has set pricing for voice, text and data wireless services per unit.  Pricing per unit is in the form of a monthly recurring charge (“MRC”) that may or may not include minutes of use, text units or data units.  Additional add on pricing per unit is available for additional data units;

·

ATT Apex: ATT voice, text or data service and ATT IoT service.  ATT Apex through a contract with KonaTel has set pricing for voice, text and data and IoT wireless services per unit.  Pricing per unit is in the form of an MRC that may or may not include minutes of use, text units or data units.  Additional add on pricing per unit is available for additional data units;

·

Verizon Wireless VPP, a Verizon IoT product: Verizon VPP, through a contract with KonaTel, has set pricing for IoT wireless services per unit.  Pricing per unit is in the form of an MRC that includes data units with defined over plan use pricing;

·

Orbcomm, an Orbcomm T-Mobile IoT Product: Orbcomm, through a contract with KonaTel, has set pricing for IoT wireless services per unit.  Pricing per unit is in the form of an MRC that include data units with defined over plan use pricing; and

·

Global Connection Inc. of America, doing business as “StandUP Wireless”: StandUP Wireless through a contract with KonaTel has set pricing for Lifeline wireless services per unit.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements or Labor Contracts

KonaTel was recentlyOur wholly owned subsidiary, IM Telecom, is an FCC licensed ETC and is one of the original twenty-two (22) FCC licensed wireless cellular resellers to hold an FCC approved bywireless Lifeline Compliance Plan in the United States (as of 2012), of which approximately twelve (12) license holders remain active today. As a licensed ETC, IM Telecom is currently authorized to distribute Lifeline subsidized mobile voice/data service in ten (10) states. IM Telecom is also an FCC licensed ACP carrier, authorized to distribute ACP subsidized mobile data services in the fifty (50) states as well as Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico. Infiniti Mobile also offers non-Lifeline and non-ACP services.

We hold a United States Patent and Trademark Office for theregistered trademark “Lifeline+®” and now needs to demonstrate the use of this trademark to finalize the Trademark.Trademark in our marketing materials.

Its current ETC agreement expires on July 27, 2018, and is automatically renewed for an additional 12 months unless either party provides notice to the other within three months of the end of the term of its intention to terminate the agreement.

We are under contract with all our service providers, some under an initial term, but all with automatic one-year renewals.

All of our MVNOs (Sub-Resellers), under our MVNE model, are under contract with KonaTel, some under an initial term, but all with automatic one-year renewals, unless KonaTel is notified 120 days prior to contract expiration term.

9

Competition

The wireless telecommunications industry is highly competitive. Our primary cellular competitors include other resellers and national carriers, such as AT&T, Verizon Sprint and T-Mobile. These national providerscellular carriers are facility-based, and are significantly larger than us and enjoy trade name and trademark public recognition, internationally, as well as greater resources, scale and competitive advantages, and direct FCC licenses, among other substantial factors, as compared to us. In addition, our cellular competitors also include numerous smaller regional carriers, existing MVNOs and ETCs, such as Metro PCS, Cricket Wireless, TracFone Wireless, Inc. (“TracFone”)QLink Wireless, TruConnect and Assurance Wireless, many of which offer or plan tomay offer cellular, mobile data, Lifeline and ACP services, andalong with no-contract postpaid and prepaid service plans. Our CPaaS competitors include, but are not limited to, Twilio, Plivo, Bandwidth, Thinq, VoIP Innovations, Telnyx, Coredial, Vonage/Nexmo, CLX Comm, Genband Kandy, Tropo, Telestax, 2600Hz and Signal Wire. Competitive factors within the wireless telecommunications industry include pricing, market saturation, service and product offerings, customer experience, network investment and quality, development and deployment of technologies and regulatory changes. Some competitors have shown a willingness to use aggressive pricing as a source of differentiation. Other competitors have sought to add ancillary services, like mobile video, to enhance their offerings. Taken together, the competitive factors we face continue to put pressure on margins as companies compete to retain their current customer base and continue to add new developments, many proprietary or patented, and customers.

Need for any Governmental Approval of Principal Products or Services

On October 23, 2018, the FCC approved our acquisition of IM Telecom, an FCC licensed wireless Lifeline carrier. In 1985, during the Reagan administration, the FCC established the Lifeline Assistance program through generic powers afforded the FCC under the Communications Act of 1934. Cellular service was added to the Lifeline program in 2009. Approximately nineteen (19) of the original twenty-two (22) ETCs still hold an FCC approved wireless reseller Lifeline Compliance Plan, but only about twelve (12) are active today.  The FCC has not approved any new wireless reseller Lifeline Compliance Plans since 2012. We expect our future gross revenues to mainly come from government subsidized mobile voice and mobile data services.

Existing and Probable Government Regulation to Our Current and Intended Business

The FCC has a number ofseveral complex requirements and proceedings that affect our operations and that could increase our costs or diminish our revenues. For example, the FCC has rules regarding provision of 911 and E-911 services, porting telephone numbers, roaming, disabilities access, privacy and cyber security,cybersecurity, consumer protection, and the universal service and Lifeline programs.programs, including eligibility, reimbursement and program requirements. Many of these and other issues are being considered in ongoing proceedings, and we cannot predict whether or how such actions will affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our ability to provide services and generate revenues could be harmed by adverse regulatory action or changes to existing laws and regulations. In addition, regulation of companies that offer competing services can impact our business indirectly.

KonaTel is pursuing the purchase of a United States Lifeline carrier with an FCC approved Compliance Plan.  Approval for the acquisition of a Lifeline carrier with an approved Compliance Plan rests with the FCC. Without FCC approval, we will be unable to purchase a Lifeline carrier with an FCC approved Compliance Plan.  Lifeline was created 33 years ago under President Ronald Reagan as part of the 1984 Telecommunications Act.  Under President George W. Bush, the program began to allow cell phones, and there was some initial duplication of service.  Unlike a traditional landline phone, a cell phone is not tied to a physical address. Since that time (2010 to 2012), the FCC implemented the National Lifeline Accountability Database (“NLAD”) to curb duplications.  Today, a strict process is followed and multiple forms of government issued identification are required to prove eligibility.  For every single Lifeline applicant and before Lifeline eligibility is ever approved, this information is cross-checked, in real time via software and via human oversight, against the FCC’s NLAD database.  Duplications plummeted after implementation of these new FCC procedures. Management believes there are an estimated 39 million Lifeline eligible households in the United States, and only 12 million are believed to be currently served, leaving approximately 27 million unserved/eligible households.  There are only 18 current ETCs who hold an FCC approved Compliance Plan.  No new Compliance Plans have been approved by the FCC since 2012, so Lifeline is a tightly controlled market.  We anticipate that approximately one-third of our future gross revenues will come from Lifeline services, which will be overseen by Charles L. Schneider, Jr., one of our key personnel, who has over 30 years’ experience in the Telecom Industry and was the CEO of the nation’s eighth largest Lifeline carrier for five years.  See the heading “Significant Employees” of the caption “Directors and Executive Officers” of this Item, below.

If this purchase is completed, we will be subject to substantial additional FCC rules and regulations that could have an adverse affect on this segment of our business.

Existing and Probable Government Regulation to Our Current and Intended Business

FCC

The FCC has a number of complex requirements and proceedings that affect our operations and that could increase our costs or diminish our revenues. For example, the FCC has rules regarding provision of 911 and E-911 services, porting telephone numbers, roaming, disabilities access, privacy and cyber security, consumer protection, and the universal service and Lifeline programs. Many of these and other issues are being considered in ongoing proceedings, and we cannot predict whether or how such actions will affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our ability to provide services and generate revenues could be harmed by adverse regulatory action or changes to existing laws and regulations. In addition, regulation of companies that offer competing services can impact our business indirectly.

Smaller Reporting Company

We are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and we are subject to the disclosure requirements of Regulation S-K of the SEC, as a “smaller reporting company.”  That designation will relieverelieves us of some of the informational requirements of Regulation S-K.S-K and Article 8 of Regulation S-X of the SEC.

Emerging Growth Company

In 2020, our “emerging growth company” designation as defined in the “Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012,” or the “JOBS Act,” expired as of the fifth anniversary of our initial registered public offering. During our emerging growth company designation, we did not utilize any financial statement waivers available to us as a result of that designation.

Sarbanes/Oxley Act

We are also subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  The Sarbanes/Oxley Act created a strong and independent accounting oversight board to oversee the conduct of auditors of public companies and strengthens auditor independence.  It also requires steps to enhance the direct responsibility of senior members of management for financial reporting and for the quality of financial disclosures made by public companies; establishes clear statutory rules to limit, and to expose to public view, possible conflicts of interest affecting securities analysts; creates guidelines for audit committee members’ appointment,appointments, compensation and oversight of the work of public companies’ auditors; management assessment of our internal controls; auditor attestation to management’s conclusions about internal controls; prohibits certain insider trading during pension fund blackout periods; requires companies and auditors to evaluate internal controls and procedures; and establishes a federal crime of securities fraud, among other provisions. Compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act could substantially increase our legal and accounting costs.

Exchange Act Reporting Requirements

Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act requires all companies with securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC regarding proxy solicitations, as outlined in Regulation 14A. Matters submitted to our shareholders at a special or annual meeting thereof or pursuant to a written consent will require us to provide our shareholders with the information outlined in Schedules 14A or 14C of Regulation 14; preliminary copies of this information must be submitted to the SEC at least 10ten (10) days prior to the date that definitive copies of this information are forwarded to our shareholders.

We are required to file annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q with the Securities Exchange CommissionSEC on a regular basis, and are required to timely disclose certain material events (e.g., entry into a definitive material agreement, changes in corporate control;control, acquisitions or dispositions of a significant amount of assets other than in the ordinary course of business;business, bankruptcy and bankruptcy)receivership filings and the sale of in excess of five percent (5%) of our outstanding securities, among various other material matters) in a Current Report on Form 8-K. See SEC Form 8-K for a more complete description of the type of material events required to be disclosed.

Number of Total Employees and Number of Full-Time Employees

Across our companies, we have a total of thirty-seven (37) employees; thirty-five (35) full-time employees and two (2) part-time employees.

Subsidiaries

We have 21 full time employeesthree (3) wholly owned subsidiaries: KonaTel Nevada; IM Telecom; and one part time employee.Apeiron Systems. Our subsidiary KonaTel Nevada, has remained inactive since early 2021.

SubsidiariesAdditional Information

We have one wholly-owned operating subsidiary: KonaTel, Inc., incorporated in Nevada.

Research and Development Costs During the Last Two Fiscal Years

We are not engaged in any research or development and have not devoted any efforts to research and development during our last two calendar years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, or to the nine month period ended September 30, 2017.

Additional Information

You may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.  You may also find all of the reports or registration statements that we have previously filed electronically with the SEC at its Internet site at www.sec.gov.  Please call in the Edgar Archives of the SEC or in our website at 1-202-551-8090 for further information on this or other Public Reference Rooms.  Our SEC reports and registration statements are also available from commercial document retrieval services, such as CCH Washington Service Bureau, whose telephone number is 1-800-955-5219.

konatel.com.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTORS

As we are a “smallersmaller reporting company”company as defined by Section 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information under this Item or in our annual or quarterly reports filed with the SEC; however, we believe this information may be of value to our shareholders or potential investors in our Company for this filing.Company. These risk factors should be considered in light of the caption “Forward-Looking Statements” at the forepart of this CurrentAnnual Report. We reserve the right not to provide risk factors in our future filings. Our primary risk factors and other considerations include:

Risks Related to the Company

We have a limited operating history (October 2014) and cannot ensure the long-term successful operation of our business or the execution of our business plan.

We have a limited operating history, having commenced our current business operations in November of 2014, and our wireless marketing technology and solutions are an evolving business offering. As a result, investors have a limited track record by which to evaluate our future performance. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by growing companies in new and rapidly evolving markets. We may be unable to successfully accomplish and fund our current endeavors, which would materially impact our ability to implement our business plan, including:

·

establishing and maintaining broad market acceptance of our technology, solutions, services and platforms, and converting that acceptance into direct and indirect sources of revenue;

·

establishing and maintaining adoption of our technology, solutions, services and platforms in and on a variety of environments, experiences and device types;

·

timely and successfully developing new technology, solutions, services and platform features, and increasing the functionality and features of our existing technology, solutions, services and platform offerings;

·

developing technology, solutions, services and platforms that result in a high degree of customer satisfaction and a high level of end-customer usage;

·

successfully responding to competition, including competition from emerging technologies and solutions;

·

developing and maintaining strategic relationships to enhance the distribution, features, content and utility of our technology, solutions, services and platforms;

·

identifying, attracting and retaining talented engineering, network operations, program management, technical services, creative services and other personnel at reasonable market compensation rates in the markets in which we employ such personnel; and

·

integration of potential evolving offerings of products and acquisitions.

Our business strategy may be unsuccessful, and we may be unable to address the risks we face in a cost-effective manner, if at all. If we are unable to successfully accomplish these tasks, our business will be harmed, and we may fail.

We have experienced minimal net income since our inception in October 2014, and substantial losses, and there is no assurance thatFor the year end December 31, 2022, we will not continue to experience losses in our business.

We had unaudited and accountant reviewedreported gross revenues of approximately $9,740,000 during$20,023,340, cost of revenues of $15,033,733, operating expenses of $7,544,292, other income and expenses of ($397,675) and a net loss of ($2,952,360). We anticipate additional revenue and net income growth in 2023, further reducing our accumulated deficit balance.

For the prior year ended December 31, 2021, we reported gross revenues of $12,834,844, cost of revenues of $7,105,464, operating expenses of $5,091,033, other income and expenses of ($15,361) and net income of $622,986.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, with cost2022, we had $12,352, in non-cash depreciation expense. As of revenues being approximately $7,070,000, together with operating and other expenses of approximately $3,090,000, resulting in a net income of approximately $422,000; unaudited and accountant reviewed gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015, were approximately $6,925,000, with cost of revenues being approximately $4,470,000, along with operating and other expenses of approximately $2,830,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately ($467,000); and unaudited and accountant reviewed gross revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017, of approximately $9,350,000, with cost of revenues being approximately $7,645,000, along with operating and other expenses of approximately $2,630,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately ($925,000) during this fiscal period.  If we cannot eliminate2022, our losses and achieve profitability, our business may fail.  Audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, and reviewed financial statements for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, all by a PCAOB registered auditing firm, will not be available until on or before 75 days from the Effective Time of the KonaTel Merger. Accordingly, the foregoing amounts should not be relied upon and may change in the referenced audited and reviewed financial statements.accumulated deficit was $8,297,864.

12

The United States Government’s dissolution or reduction of the Lifeline Program or the elimination of “resellers” of these services would have a substantial adverse affecteffect on our current and planned business operations.

·

Considering there are over 10 million current Lifeline recipients or customers, this would be a draconian move, like dissolving Medicare or Social Security, however, it is a possibility.  Government (federal and/or state)

·

Considering there are approximately 7,300,000 current Lifeline users and approximately 38,000,000 eligible Lifeline customers (according to USAC), this would be a draconian move; however, it is a possibility. Federal or state governmental agencies could also significantly reduce or delay Lifeline reimbursement payments to Lifeline carriers, forcing Lifeline carriers to continue to provide minimum Lifeline services and at a reduced reimbursement rate. Depending on any reimbursement reduction, a reduction would diminish earnings and could make Lifeline unprofitable. The FCC established the Lifeline program in 1985 to ensure that qualifying low-income consumers could afford phone service and the opportunities and security it provides. Congress supported and strengthened Lifeline in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, requiring that affordable service and advanced communications be available to low-income consumers across the country.

The increase in the number of resellers of services and atproducts that we provide by any national carrier could saturate the markets and market segments of our targeted customers, which could affect our business adversely.

Market saturation could occur when a reduced reimbursement rate.  Depending onnational carrier allows too many resellers into the reimbursement reduction, a reduction would diminish earnings or even make Lifeline unprofitable.  “The FCC establishedmarket and margins drop so low where the Lifeline program in 1985 to ensure that qualifying low-income consumers could afford phone servicereseller business model is no longer profitable, and the opportunitiesour business may suffer and security it provides. Congress supported and strengthened Lifelinefail.

A decrease in the Telecommunications Actamount of 1996, requiring that affordable servicewholesale voice and advanced communications bemobile data available to low-income consumers acrosspurchase from wholesale aggregators could cause a substantial reduction in our business and customers.

We purchase a portion of our mobile data service (“IOT”) directly from national carriers and purchase the country.”remainder of our wholesale voice and mobile data from wholesale aggregators or MVNEs like PWG and Telispire.  If one of these aggregators vacated the market, such action could strand many resellers of these services, like us, and could substantially reduce our current and anticipated revenues from our IoT or cellular service.

·

Lifeline requires several factors to be successful.  The impact of negative government change and negativeA wireless reseller could gain a significant price advantage over other wireless resellers by entering into a special national carrier pricing have been outlined above.  In additionagreement not available to those two risks, an interruptionother resellers.

Any special national carrier pricing agreement that was not available to us would allow that particular reseller to “undercut” all other resellers.  This scenario could also apply to a national wireless carrier acquiring a reseller then allowing that reseller to operate with special wholesale pricing not available to other resellers.  This scenario has happened in the supply of low cost phones and/orpast with Cricket Communications, Inc. and Ultra Mobile, resellers that were acquired by a reduction of Lifeline agents (no access to or not enough access to agents) wouldnational carrier. Any such event could have a negative impact on Lifeline.

·

Proper equipment financiering and cash resources to pay up-front commission payments (sometimes required) is critical to facilitate Lifeline, B2B and retail sales and would have a negativesubstantial adverse impact on our business.business and revenues.

Adequate funds for our current and intended operations may not be available, requiring us to raise additional financing or curtail our current and planned operations significantly.

We might be required to raise additional funding through public or private debt or equity financings. Any additional equity financings may be dilutive to our current shareholders and may be completed at a discount to the then-current market price of our common stock. Debt financing, if available, would likely involve restrictive covenants on our operations or pertaining to future debt or equity financing arrangements. Nevertheless, we may not successfully complete any future equity or debt financing. Adequate funds for our operations,

whether from financial markets, collaborative or other arrangements, may not be available when needed or on terms attractive to us. If adequate funds are not available, our plans to operate our business maybe adversely affected, and we could be required to curtail our activities significantly and/or cease operations.

We will be unable to implement our business plan if we cannot raise sufficient capital and may be required to pay higher prices for capital based on the current illiquid market for our common stock, among other factors.

We may need to raise additional capital to implement our business plan and meet financial obligations as they come due. If we do need to raise additional capital, and cannot attract sufficient capital from customary sources, we may be required to pay a higher price for capital.

Factors affecting the availability and price of capital may include the following:

A national carrier (Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile or Sprint)T-Mobile) could dissolve, reduce or restrict any wholesale program, agent program or reseller program.  This includes both voice and data IoT, which would adversely affect our business.

KonaTel,We, like all voice and data resellers, isare dependent on the FCC licensed national carriers to provide services that can be resold for a profit.  The wireless carriers own/control their respective network (towers) and provide the wireless service.  Resellers do not own their own network and are dependent on the national carriers to provide a reseller program.  These carriers could eliminate a reseller program or implement new policies that could reduce the profit margins making any applicable program unprofitable.  They could also implement market restorations reducing markets we could sell into, and thereby havingwhich would have a direct adverse effect on our current and future prospects.

Similarly, one of these national carriers could reduce their own retail pricing, with no corresponding reduction in their wholesale pricing, that in-turn wouldwhich could create a situation where a reseller is unable to make enough profit to sustain operations.  This has happened in the past with Verizon until Verizon’s wholesale (reseller) division finally reduced wholesale prices.

A wireless reseller could gain a significant price advantage over other wireless resellers by entering into a special national carrier pricing agreement not available to other resellers.

This would in-turn allow that particular reseller to “undercut” all other resellers.  This scenario could also apply to a national wireless carrier acquiring a reseller then allowing that reseller to operate with special wholesale pricing not available to other resellers.  This scenario has happened in the past (i.e., Cricket Communications, Inc. (“Cricket”) and Ultra Mobile (“Ultra”), resellers acquired by a national carrier).  Any such event could have a substantial adverse impact on our business and revenues.

The increase in the number of resellers of services and products that we provide by any national carrier could saturate the markets and market segments that KonaTel targeted customers.

Market saturation could occur when a national carrier allows too many resellers into the market and margins drop so low the reseller business model is unsustainable, and our business may suffer and fail.

A decrease in the number of wholesale voice from aggregators of these services could cause a substantial reduction in our business and customers.

We purchase IoT directly from national carriers, and purchase some of our wholesale voice from wholesale aggregators or MVNEs like Telispire and Orbcomm.  If one of these aggregators vacated the market, such action could strand many resellers of these services, like us, and could substantially reduce our current and anticipated revenues from this IoT service.

Adequate funds for our current and intended operations may not be available, requiring us to raise additional financing or curtail our current and plan operations significantly.

We will likely be required to raise additional funding through public or private debt or equity financings. Any additional equity financings may be dilutive to shareholders and may be completed at a discount to the then-current market price of our common stock, which common stock currently trades in an ill-liquid market on the OTC Pink Tier. Debt financing, if available, would likely involve restrictive covenants on our operations or pertaining to future debt or equity financing arrangements. Nevertheless, we may not successfully complete any future equity or debt financing. Adequate funds for our operations, whether from financial markets, collaborative or other arrangements, may not be available when needed or on terms attractive to us. If adequate funds are not available, our plans to operate our business may be adversely affected, and we could be required to curtail our activities significantly and/or cease operating.

We will be unable to implement our business plan if we cannot raise sufficient capital and may be required to pay a high price for capital based on the current ill-liquid market for our common stock, among other factors.

We anticipate that we will need additional capital to implement our business plan, and if we cannot attract sufficient capital from customary sources, we may be required to pay a high price for capital.

We will need to obtain additional capital to implement our business plan and meet our financial obligations as they become due. We may not be able to raise the additional capital needed or may be required to pay a high price for any required capital. Factors affecting the availability and price of capital may include the following:

·

the availability and cost of capital generally;

·

our financial results;

·

the experience and reputation of our management team;

·

market interest, or lack of interest, in our industry and business plan;

·

the trading volume of, and volatility in, the market for our common stock, if there is a reasonable trading market for our common stock;

·

our ongoing success, or failure, in executing our business plan;

·

the amount of our capital needs; and

·

the amount of debt, options, warrants and convertible securities that may be outstanding in our Company at any time.

We may be unable to meet our current or future obligations or to adequately exploit existing or future opportunities if we cannot raise sufficient capital. If we are unable to obtain any required capital for an extended period of time, we may be forced to discontinue or curtail our business operations and we may fail.

We expect that there will be significant consolidation in our industry. Our failure or inability to lead that consolidation would have a severe adverse impact on our access to financing, customers, technology,technologies and human resources.

Our industry is currently composed of a small number of substantial entities, and a relatively large number of small businesses, no single one of which is dominant, or which provides integrated solutions and product offerings incorporating much of the available technology. Accordingly, we believe that substantial consolidation of the smaller companies may occur in our industry in the near future as has occurred with many larger participants. If we do not play a positive role in that consolidation, either as a leader or as a participant whose capabilities and offerings are merged into a larger entity, we may be left out of this process, with product and service offerings of limited value compared with those of our competitors. Moreover, even if we lead the consolidation process, the market may not validate the decisions we make in that process.process and our business will suffer and may fail.

Our success depends on our product and service technologies achieving and maintaining widespread acceptance in our targeted markets.

Our success will depend to a large extent on broad market acceptance of our wirelesstelecommunications solutions among our current and prospective customers. Our prospective customers may still notbe unwilling to use our solutions for a number of other reasons, including preference for static advertising, lack of familiarity with our technology,technologies, preference for competing technologies or perceived lack of reliability. We believe that the acceptance of our technologies by prospective customers will depend primarily on the following factors:

·

our ability to demonstrate the economic and other benefits attendant to our products and services;

·

our customers becoming comfortable with using our wireless technologies; and

·

the reliability of these services and technologies.

Because we do not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers, the failure to obtain anticipated orders or the deferral or cancellation of commitments could have an adverse effectseffect on our business.business and future prospects.

Our business is characterized by short-term purchase orders and contracts that do not require that purchases be made. This makes forecasting our sales difficult. The failure to obtain anticipated orders and deferrals or cancellations of purchase commitments because of changes in customer requirements, or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have experienced such challenges in the past and may experience such challenges in the future.

14

Most of our contracts are terminable by our customers with limited notice and without penalty payments, and early terminations could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Most of our contracts are terminable by our customers following limited notice and without early termination payments or liquidated damages due from them. In addition, each stage of a project often represents a separate contractual commitment, at the end of which the customerscustomer may elect to delay or not to proceed to the next stage of the project. We cannot assure you that one or more of our customers will not terminate a material contract or materially reduce the scope of aany large project. The delay, cancellation or significant reduction in the scope of a large project or a number of projects could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our industry is characterized by frequent technological change. If we are unable to adapt our products and services and develop new products and services to keep up with these rapid changes, we will not be able to obtain or maintain market share.share and our business may fail.

We must respond to changing technology and industry standards in a timely and cost-effective manner. We may not be successful in using new technologies, developing new products and services or enhancing existing products and services in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Furthermore, even if we successfully adapt our products and services, these new technologies or enhancements may not achieve market acceptance.  The market for our products and services is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs, heavy competition and frequent new product and service introductions. If we fail to develop new products and services or modify or improve our existing products and services in response to these changes in technology, customer demands or industry standards, our products and services could become less competitive or obsolete.

We must respond to changing technology and industry standards in a timely and cost-effective manner. We may not be successful in using new technologies, developing new products and services or enhancing existing products and services in a timely and cost-effective manner. Furthermore, even if we successfully adapt our products and services, these new technologies or enhancements may not achieve market acceptance.

A portion of our business involves the use of software technologytechnologies that we have developed or licensed. Industries involving the ownership and licensing of software-based intellectual property are characterized by frequent intellectual-propertyintellectual property litigation, and we could face claims of infringement by others in the industry. Such claims are costly and add uncertainty to our operational results.

A portion of our business involves our ownership and/or licensing of software. This market space is characterized by frequent intellectual-propertyintellectual property claims and litigation. We could be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual-propertyintellectual property rights resulting in significant expense and the potential loss of our own intellectual-propertyintellectual property rights. From time to time, third parties may assert copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual-propertyintellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business.

Any litigation to determine the validity of these claims, including claims arising through our contractual indemnification of our business partners, regardless of their merit or resolution, would likely be costly and time consuming and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. If any such litigation resulted in an adverse ruling, we could be required to:

·

pay substantial damages;

·

cease the development, use, licensing or sale of infringing products;

·

discontinue the use of certain technology; or

·

obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party claiming infringement, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all.

Our business may be adversely affected by malicious applications that interfere with, or exploit security flaws in, our products and services.

Our business may be adversely affected by malicious applications that make changes to our customers’ computer systems and interfere with the operation and use of our products or products that impact our business. These applications may attempt to interfere with our ability to communicate with our customers’ devices. The interference may occur without disclosure to or consent from our customers, resulting in a negative experience that our customers may associate with our products and services. These applications may be difficult or impossible to uninstall or disable, may reinstall themselves and may circumvent other applications’ efforts to block or remove them. The ability to provide customers with a superior interactive marketing technology experience is critical to our success. If our efforts to combat these malicious applications fail, or if our products and services have actual or perceived vulnerabilities, there may be claims based on such failure orfailures and our reputation may be harmed, which would damage our business and financial condition.condition and our ability to continue our business.

We face risks relating to Cyberattack.

Our business operations are dependent upon secure information technology systems and telecommunications networks.  Breaches of these systems and networks through cyberattack or other unauthorized access may have numerous negative effects on our business, including lost sales and damage to customer relationships; disruptions on our operations; reputational harm and negative publicity; lost trust from our customers, partners and employees; lawsuits resulting from the compromise of sensitive customer or employee information; costs of mitigation; and remediation and security enhancement expenses. 

We compete with other companies that have moresubstantially greater resources, which meansand we are at a distinct competitive disadvantage in our chosen industry.

The market for our products and service solution technologies is generally highly competitive, and we expect competition to increase in the future. Some of our competitors or potential competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us.we have. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than us.we do.

15

We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new products, services and technologies. Successful new product and service introductions or enhancements by our competitors could reduce sales and the market acceptance of our products and services, cause intense price competition or make our products and services obsolete. To be competitive, we must continue to invest significant resources in research and development, sales and marketing and customer support. If we do not have sufficient resources to make these investments or are unable to make the technological advances necessary to be competitive, our competitive position will suffer.suffer, and we may fail. Increased competition could result in price reductions, fewer customer orders, reduced margins and loss of market share. Our failure to compete successfully against current or future competitors could also adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Our future success depends on key personnel and our ability to attract and retain additional personnel.

Our success is dependent upon attracting and maintaining key personnel, including KonaTel’sour founder, Chairman and current sole owner,CEO, D. Sean McEwen, and various key executive employees, including Charles L. Schneider, Jr.,Joshua Ploude from whom KonaTelwe acquired CS Agency,Apeiron Systems and J. William Riner, a former co-ownerwho serves as CEO of Coast to Coast.  Apeiron Systems, and Charles D. Griffin, our President and COO, among others, who are listed in Part III, Item 10 of this Annual Report.

Further, if we fail to retain our key personnel or to attract, retain, and motivate other qualified employees, our ability to maintain and develop our business may be adversely affected. Our future success depends significantly on the continued service of our key technical, sales, and senior management personnel and their ability to execute our growth strategy. The loss of the services of our key employees could harm our business. We may be unable to retain our employees or to attract, assimilate and retain other highly qualified employees who could migrate to other employers who offer competitive or superior compensation packages.

Unpredictability in financing markets could impair our ability to grow our business through acquisitions.

We anticipate that opportunities to acquire similar businesses will materially depend on the availability of financing alternatives with acceptable terms. As a result, poor credit and other market conditions or uncertainty in financial markets could materially limit our ability to grow through acquisitions since such conditions and uncertainty make obtaining financing more difficult.

Our reliance on information management and transaction systems to operate our business exposes us to cyber incidents and hacking of our sensitive information if our outsourced service provider experiences a security breach.

Effective information security internal controls are necessary for us to protect our sensitive information from illegal activities and unauthorized disclosure, in addition to denial ofpreventing service attacks and corruption of our data. In addition,Further, we rely on the information security internal controls maintained by our outsourced service provider. Breaches of our information management system could also adversely affect our business reputation. Finally, significant information system disruptions could adversely affect our ability to effectively manage operations or reliably report results.

Because our technology, products, platforms and services are complex and are deployed in and across complex environments, they may have errors or defects that could seriously harm our business.

Our technology, proprietary platforms, products and services are highly complex and are designed to operate in and across data centers, large and complex networks and other elements of the digital media workflow that we do not own or control. On an ongoing basis, we need to perform proactive maintenance services on our platform and related software services to correct errors and defects. In the future, there may be additional errors and defects in our software that may adversely affect our services. We may not have in place adequate reporting, tracking, monitoring and quality assurance procedures to ensure that we can detect errors in our software in a timely manner. If we are unable to efficiently and cost-effectively fixcorrect errors or other problems that may be identified, or if there are unidentified errors that allow persons to improperly access our services, we could experience loss of revenues and market share, damage to our reputation, increased expenses and legal actions by our customers.customers and our business may fail.

We may have insufficient network or server capacity for our current and planned business, which could result in interruptions in our services and the loss of revenues.revenues resulting in a negative impact on our business.

Our operations are dependent, in part, upon:upon network capacity provided by our telecommunications network and third-party telecommunications networks; data center services provider owned and leased infrastructure and capacity; server capacity located at the data center services provider partner or partners; and our own infrastructure and equipment. Collectively, this infrastructure, equipment and capacity must be sufficiently robust to handle all of our customers’ wireless requirements, particularly in the event of unexpected surges in high-definition video traffic and network services incidents. We may not be adequately prepared for unexpected increases in bandwidth and related infrastructure demands from our customers. In addition, the bandwidth we have contracted to purchase may become unavailable for a variety of reasons, including payment disputes, outages or such service providers going out of business. Any failure of these service providers or our own infrastructure to provide the capacity we require due to financial or other reasons may result in a reduction in or the interruption of service to our customers, leading to an immediate decline in revenue and possible additional decline in revenue, as a result of subsequent customer losses.losses, which could result in the cessation of all or part of our business operations.

16

We do not have sufficient capital to engage in materialsubstantial research and development, which may harm our long-term growth.

In light of our limited resources in general, we have made no materialsubstantial investments in research and development over the past several years.development. This conserves capital in the short term. In the long term, as a result of our failure to investlimited investment in research and development, our technologytechnologies and product offerings may not keep pace with the market, and we may lose any existing competitive advantage. Over the long term, this may harm our revenuesrevenue growth and our ability to becomebe profitable.

Our business operations are susceptible to interruptions caused by events beyond our control.

Our business operations are susceptible to interruptions caused by events beyond our control. We are vulnerable to the following potential problems, among others:

·

our platform, technology, products, and services and underlying infrastructure, or that of our key suppliers, may be damaged or destroyed by events beyond our control, such as fires, earthquakes, floods, power outages or telecommunications failures;

·

we and our customers and/or partners may experience interruptions in service as a result of the accidental or malicious actions of Internet users, hackers or current or former employees;

·

we may face liability for transmitting viruses to third parties that damage or impair their access to computer networks, programs, data or information. Eliminating computer viruses and alleviating other security problems may require interruptions, delays or cessation of service to our customers; and

·

the failure of our systems or those of our suppliers may disrupt service to our customers (and from our customers to their customers), which could materially impact our operations (and the operations of our customers), adversely affect our relationships with our customers and lead to lawsuits and contingent liability.

The occurrence of any of the foregoing could result in claims for consequential and other damages, significant repair and recovery expenses and extensive customer losses and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business operations could be impacted by the current world health crisis.

 On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus (the “Covid-19”) outbreak a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern,” and on March 10, 2020, declared it to be a pandemic. Actions taken around the world to help mitigate the spread of the coronavirus included restrictions on travel and quarantines in certain areas, and forced closures for certain types of public places and businesses. The coronavirus and actions taken to mitigate it have had and are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on the economies and financial markets of many countries, including the geographical areas in which we operate. While it is unknown how long these conditions will last and what the complete financial affect will be on us, to date, and as a result of actions taken by management to mitigate a material impact to our financial statements or our operational results, we are not currently experiencing a material impact to our financial statements or our results of operations; however, a pandemic typically results in social distancing, travel bans and quarantines, which may result in limited access to our facilities, customers, management, support staff and professional advisors.  These, in turn, may not only impact our operations, financial condition and demand for our services, but our overall ability to react timely to mitigate the impact of this event.  Given our small staff, if a key member of our team were disabled by COVID-19, it could have a material negative impact on our business.  Also, it may substantially hamper our efforts to provide our investors with timely information and to comply with our filing obligations under the Exchange Act with the SEC. If this pandemic were to last a prolonged period of time, we could see a decline in revenue due to the closure of customer businesses, which could then impact our ability to pay our short-term debts. Our concentration of revenue from a small group of Apeiron Systems’ customers makes it reasonably possible that we are vulnerable to the risk of a long-term severe impact. Our dependence on certain suppliers to provide equipment to be distributed or sold to our customers could also be impacted if inventory shortages occur due to import or export restrictions resulting from the pandemic.

General global market and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on our operating performance and results of operations.

Our business has been and could continue to be affected by general economic and market conditions. Weakness in the United States and worldwide economy could have a negative effect on our operating results. Additionally, in a down-cycle economic environment, we may experience the negative effects of increased competitive pricing pressure, customer loss, slowdown in commerce over the Internet and corresponding decrease in traffic delivered over our network and failures by our customers to pay amounts owed to us on a timely basis or at all. Suppliers on which we rely for equipment, field services, servers, bandwidth, co-location and other services could also be negatively impacted by economic conditions that, in turn, could have a negative impact on our business operations or revenues. Flat or worsening economic conditions may harm our operating results and financial condition.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine may disrupt global telecommunications networks.

While we do not have any direct exposure to Russia, Belarus or Ukraine through our operations, employee base, investments or sourcing of goods and services, third party companies with whom we do business may use Ukraine-based software developers.  These relationships may be affected by the global geopolitical disruptions caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.  We also face the risk that the invasion and ongoing war may result in disruptions to national and international telecommunications networks, either through cyberattacks by state actors or others, physical damage to the networks themselves or due to interruptions in the supply chain for the materials and services necessary to maintain them.  The likelihood and the potential size and scope of any such damage or disruptions is difficult to predict.  However, they may have significant negative effects on the Company’s future business and results of operations.

Rising inflation may negatively affect our operating results.

During 2021 and 2022, global economic conditions have deteriorated, with significantly increased inflation and the risks of further inflation and recession in 2023 and beyond.  These unfavorable economic conditions may lead to decreased demand for our products or services in the future, especially by our lower-income customers, which would have a negative effect on our business and results of operations.  In particular, inflation could affect the price of equipment for the services provided in our Lifeline Program. The ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine and related sanctions on Russia may also lead to higher prices for commodities used in the production of telephones and other technologies used in the global telecommunications industry, which may result in decreased demand for our products and services.  To the extent that we are unable to increase the prices of our goods and services in response to increased costs, our operating margins will be compressed.

Supply chain disruptions could adversely affect our business.

Supply chain dislocations resulting from global geopolitical and public health issues such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the COVID-19 pandemic and other causes may have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.  Such disruptions may increase our costs of doing business, including through significant increases in the price of our products and their components and materials and the related costs of shipment, including equipment used in the Lifeline Program.  Supply chain disruptions may also adversely affect our access to suppliers, manufacturers, customers and vendors and may impair our ability to perform contracted services.  Delays in our ability to meet our obligations as a result of supply chain issues may negatively affect our reputation, our relationships with customers and our ability to deliver products and services.

The markets in which we operate are rapidly emerging, and we may be unable to compete successfully against existing or future competitors to our business.

The markets in which we operate isare becoming increasingly competitive. Our current competitors generally include those that offer similar products and services. These competitors, including future new competitors who may emerge, may be able to develop comparable or superior solution capabilities, platforms, services, products and/or a series of services that provide a similar or more robust set of features and functionality than the technology,technologies, products and services we offer. If this occurs, we may be unable to grow as necessary to make our business profitable.

Whether or notRegardless of whether we have superior products, many of these current and potential future competitors have a longer operating history in their current respective business areas and greater market presence, brand recognition, engineering and marketing capabilities, and financial, technological and personnel resources than we do. Existing and potential competitors with an extended operating history, even if not directly related to our business, have an inherent marketing advantage because of the reluctance of many potential customers to entrust key operations to a company that may be perceived as unproven.unproven or in the early stage of its development. In addition, our existing and potential future competitors may be able to use their extensive resources:

·

to develop and deploy new products and services more quickly and effectively than we can;

·

to develop, improve and expand their platforms and related infrastructures more quickly than we can;

·

to reduce costs, particularly hardware costs, because of discounts associated with large volume purchases and longer term relationships and commitments;

·

to offer less expensive products, technology, platform, and services as a result of a lower cost structure, greater capital reserves or otherwise;

·

to adapt more swiftly and completely to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements;

·

to take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more readily; and

·

to devote greater resources to the marketing and sales of their products, technology, platform, and services.

17

If we are unable to compete effectively in our various markets, or if competitive pressures place downward pressure on the prices at which we offer our products and services, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.suffer, and our business may fail.

Compliance with the reporting requirements of federal securities laws can be expensive.

We are a public “reporting company” in the United States, and accordingly, subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and other federal securities laws, rules and theregulations, including compliance obligations ofunder the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports and other information with the SEC and furnishing audited and reviewed financial statements in our reports tofiled with the SEC, along with required communications with our shareholders, are substantial. If we doWe have incurred and expect to continue to incur costs associated with becoming and continuing as a public company, including, but not provide current information about our Companylimited to, those broker-dealers who may trade in our common stock, they will not be able to trade our common stock.legal, accounting, filing and other related costs and expenses. Failure to comply with the applicable securities laws could result in private or governmental legal action against us or our officers and directors, which could have a detrimental impact on our business and financial condition, the value of our common stock and the ability of our shareholders to resell their common stock.

Increased costs as a result of being a public company.

We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur costs associated with becoming and continuing as a public company, including, but not limited to, legal, accounting, filing and other related costs and expenses.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.

All future revenues are anticipated to be utilized for research, development and the furtherance of theour business plan of KonaTel,and our technologies, products, services and platform, and accordingly, it is highly unlikely that you will receive any dividends from the reorganized KonaTelus in the near future, if ever.

We do not intend to provide guidance about future events in the foreseeable future.

Our Board of Directors anticipates adopting a policy that will preclude us from providing guidance about matters that may happen in the foreseeable future, though any such policy will not prohibit our responsibilities to provide forward-looking information to our shareholders and to the public in our Exchange Act filings with the SEC, including our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” required in a number of SEC reports and registration statements.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our common stock trades only in an illiquid trading market.

Trading of the Company’s common stock is conducted on the OTC Markets OTC Pink Tier under the trading symbol “DALP.” This has an adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock, not only in terms of the number of shares that can be bought and sold at a given price, but also through delays in the timing of transactions and reduction in security analysts’ and the media’s coverage of us and the common stock. This may result in lower prices for our common stock than might otherwise be obtained and could also result in a larger spread between the bid and asked prices for our common stock, regardless of whether we are successful in our current and planned business operations.

There is not now and there may not ever be ana limited active trading market for our shares of or common stock.

In general, there has been minimala limited trading volume in the Company’sour common stock. The small trading volume will likely make it difficult for shareholders to sell their shares as and when they choose. Furthermore, small trading volumes are generally understood to depress market prices. As a result, you may not always be able to resell shares of the Company’sour common stock publicly at the time and prices that you feel are fair or appropriate.

The Company also has a limited public float of approximately 1,629,286 shares, with approximately 1,062,050 of these shares being reflected as “restricted securities,” and there hasAdditionally, if we do not been an “established trading market” in the Company’s common stock.  All of the 1,062,050 shares reflected as being “restricted securities” have been held approximately three years and are believedtimely file our reports required to be freely tradeablefiled with the SEC under Rule 144 or Section 4(a)(1) of the SecuritiesExchange Act, based upon legal counsel’s advice. Because of the Company’s current limited public float, among other unknown factors, the OTC Markets has refused to allow the Company’s common stock to be listed on its “OTCQB Tier,” and no new application can be filed for such a listing until on or about March 31, 2018.

Furthermore, the Company may be deemed to be a “shell company” by reason of its limited business operations.  If that were the case, and assuming your shareholdings were “restricted securities, youbroker-dealers may not be able or willing to sell anytrade our common stock, inand the CompanyOTC Markets will post adverse warnings on its website about such failures, which, unless such failures are corrected by us, could have an additional adverse impact on the viability of any market that may develop for at least one year from the filing of Form 10 Information, among other factors outlined in subparagraph (i) of SEC Rule 144, and this information would include audited financial statements of KonaTel for the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, and reviewed financial statements for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017, which may not be available for 75 days from the Effective Time; and this designation could certainly inhibit the abilityour common stock. Other adverse warnings of the CompanyOTC Markets under their current and future policies could similarly have an adverse effect on any market for our common stock, and there is no assurance that we will be able to raisesatisfy comments or concerns of the OTC Markets, if any required funding for planned operations.are expressed.

18

If an active market for our common stock develops, there is a significant risk that the Company’s common stock price may fluctuate dramatically in the future in response to any of the following factors, some of which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to:

·

variations in our quarterly operating results;

·

announcements that our revenue or income are below analysts’ expectations;

·

general economic slowdowns;

·

sales of large blocks of our common stock by insiders and others; and

·

announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital raises.

Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, which may make it more difficult for shareholders to sell our common stock.

The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9, which establishesestablished the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination, and that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of the Company’s common stock if and when such shares are eligible for sale and may cause a decline in the market value of its stock.

Because of increased regulatory efforts of governmental and quasi-governmental agencies regarding the trading of securities in the over-the-counter market, where the Company’s shares of common stock presentlythat are quoted,deemed to be penny stocks, the cost and expense of depositing and inducing a broker-dealer to effect sales of these shares is very costly, oftenwhich can be in excess of pricevalue of the shares sought to be sold.sold, and often includes requirements of legal opinions of both the selling shareholder’s counsel and the broker-dealer’s counsel, both at the expense of the selling shareholder.

Currently, broker-dealers require legal opinions of shareholders of almost all over-the-counter stocks to deposit and sell these shares, and all of these legal opinions are required to be paid for by the shareholder; and often, two (2) legal opinions are required, one (1) from the shareholder’s legal counsel and one (1) from the broker-dealer’s legal counsel. This policy has been required of mostly all low-priced over-the-counter shares,traded securities, regardless of whether the shares have been registered with the SEC, or whether there is no “restrictive” legend on the stock certificate representing the shares and always if the shares are designated as “restricted securities.” Larger, national broker-dealers will generally not even trade these securities. The high cost of these types of legal opinions is often more than the value of the shares sought to be sold, and the process can take two (2) to three (3) weeks or more. Accordingly, shareholders with limited shares of low pricedlow-priced stocks will be unable to economically sell their shares, regardless of whether an “established trading market” for the shares exists, and if they could sell their shares, the required selling process willmay inhibit their ability to sell the shares when they desire to sell their shares.

Because we became public by means of a reverse acquisition, we may not be able to attract the attention of brokerage firms.

Because we became public through a “reverse acquisition,” securities analysts of brokerage firms may not provide coverage of us since there is little incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock. Moreover, no assurance can be given that brokerage firms will want to conduct capital raises on our behalf, presently or in the future.

We have granted “piggy-back” registration rights to certain of our shareholders who hold or may purchase shares of our common stock that are “restricted securities,” and the sale of these shares of common stock could have an adverse affect on any market for the Company’s common stock that may develop in the future.

Shares of our common stock registered for resale by other shareholders may create a ceiling on any market that develops for our common stock, and may enable persons to “short” or otherwise cause material adverse affects on any such market; you may not be able to sell your shares and could lose your entire investment in our shares of common stock.

19

Our investors’ ownership in the Company may be diluted in the future.

In the future, we may issue additional authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of ownership interests of our present shareholders. We expect to need to issue a substantial number of shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exercisable for our common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, raising additional capital in the future to fund our operations and other business purposes. We currently anticipate offeringoffer incentive stock options for our officers, directors and certain significant employees and may extend this policy to others. Additional shares of common stock issued by us in the future will dilute an investor’s investment in the Company.

Directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and affiliated entities own a significant percentage of our capital stock, and they may make decisions that our shareholders do not consider to be in their best interests.

As of the date of this CurrentAnnual Report, our directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and affiliated entities beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 94% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of the date hereof, excluding Incentive Stock Options granted and outlined in this Current Report under the heading “Outstanding Equity Awards” of the caption “Executive Compensation” in this Item 5.01, below. Mr.D. Sean McEwen, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owns approximately 94%37% of our issued and outstanding shares of common voting stock by reason of his personal holdingsholdings. This percentage does not include certain vested non-compensatory stock options which he owns and that can be exercised within sixty (60) days of the irrevocable proxies granted to himdate of this Annual Report, all of which options are described under the Shareholder Voting Agreement.caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in Part III, Item 12 hereof. As a result, this ownership and various other provisions of the Shareholder Voting Agreement, heMr. McEwen may have the ability to substantially control the election of our board of directors, and the outcome of issues requiring approval by our shareholders.shareholders and other corporate actions. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company that may be favored by other shareholders. Thisshareholders; and could prevent transactions in which shareholders might otherwise recover a premium for their shares over current market prices. This concentration of ownership and influence in management and board decision-makingdecision making could also harm the price of our capital stock by, among other things, discouraging a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of our capital stock, whether by making a tender offer or attempting to obtain control of our Company.  For a more detailed discussion of the provisions of the Shareholder Voting Agreement,Also see the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions and Director Independence” set forth in this“Executive Compensation” of Part III, Item 5.01, below.11 hereof.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner or detect fraud. Consequently, investors could lose confidence in our financial reporting, and this may decreaseadversely affect any trading price offor our common stock.stock that may then exist.

We must maintain effective internal controls to provide reliable financial reports and to detect and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as would be possible with an effective control system in place. We have not performed an in-depth analysis to determine if historical undiscovered failures of internal controls exist and may in the future discover areas of our internal controlcontrols that need improvement.

We have been assessing our internal controls to identify areas that need improvement. We are continually in the process of implementing changes toevaluating our internal controls but have not yet completed implementing these changes.for effectiveness as well as evaluating the need for additional internal controls. Failure to implement these changes to our internal controls that we may deem to be ineffective or any others that it identifieswe may identify as necessary to maintain an effective system of internal controls could harm our operating results and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. Any such loss of confidence wouldcould have a substantial negative effectaffect on the trading price of our common stock.

ITEM 1B.   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2:  PROPERTIES

We do not own any property but doproperty.

We have the rights to engage in oil exploration and development on assigned leases in north central Kansas with total acreage of approximately 3,744 acres at September 30, 2017; and presently, approximately 1,290 acres.  The lease assets are valued at $171,000 as of September 30, 2017.

KonaTel has leases on the following properties:

On December 18, 2020, we entered into a lease of an office suite in Plano, TX, which commenced on January 25, 2021. Lease payments were deferred until May 1, 2021. Beginning on May 1, 2021, lease payments are $3,650 per month for the twelve (12) month period ended April 30, 2022, and $3,735 per month for the twelve (12) month period ended April 30, 2023. The lease term is for five (5) years.

Through our wholly owned subsidiary, IM Telecom, we have leases on the following properties:

Our Pennsylvania office and former Headquarters,Tulsa, Oklahoma distribution center, consisting of approximately 7,5002,466 square feet, is under a three (3) year lease that commenced on August 1, 2022. Monthly lease payments for this property are $2,356 per month for the twelve (12) month period ended July 31, 2023.

Our customer service center is in Atmore, Alabama, and locatedconsists of approximately 1,766 square feet. This lease commenced on June 1, 2022, and terminates on June 1, 2025. Monthly lease payments for this property are $2,121 per month.

Through our wholly owned subsidiary, Apeiron Systems, we have a lease at 1910 Minno Drive, # 210,the following property:

Our Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15905,office, consisting of approximately 6,900 square feet, is under a lease that commenced on JanuarySeptember 1, 2014,2022, and expires on AprilSeptember 30, 2019, at a monthly rent of $5,500.

Our New York retail store, consisting of approximately of 1,500 square feet and located at 299 N Comrie Avenue, Johnstown, New York 12095, under a2030. Monthly lease that commenced on January 1, 2003, and expired on January 1, 2007, and which is now leased on a month to month basis, at a monthly rent of $2,200.payments for this property are $4,500 per month.

Our Texas and Principal Executive Offices, consisting of approximately 3,000 square feet and located at 13601 Preston, Road, # E816, Dallas, Texas 75240, under a lease that commenced on December 1, 2016, and expires on December 31, 2017, at a monthly rent of $3,759.

20

ITEM 3:  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Except as indicated below, weWe are not a party to any pendingmaterial legal proceeding. To the knowledge of our management, no federal, state or local governmental agency is presently contemplating any proceeding against us. No director, executive officer or affiliate of ours or owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of our common stock is a party adverse to us or has a material interest adverse to us in any legal proceeding.proceedings.

On November 1, 2014, KonaTel purchased most of the assets of Coast to Coast Cellular, Inc.  Approximately 10 months following this purchase, Coast to Coast filed for bankruptcy protection, and the bankruptcy Trustee for Coast to Coast filed legal proceedings in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on September 23, 2016, Case No. 15-70602-JAD, known as Eric E. Bononi as Trustee to Coast to Coast Cellular, Inc. v. KonaTel, Inc. et. al.  The bankruptcy Trustee alleges that KonaTel acquired the assets of Coast to Coast for less than their fair market value in its November 2014, purchase, and is seeking damages against the owners of Coast to Coast, as well as KonaTel.  KonaTel has retained legal counsel to represent it in this matter and has aggressively defended this action. KonaTel’s expert report establishes that the assets were, if anything, overvalued at date of sale, and KonaTel’s counsel anticipates that this may lead to a resolution of this case in the short term.

ITEM 4:  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None; not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5:  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock was listed on the OTC Bulletin Board of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD,” now “FINRA”) on JuneUntil December 14, 2007, under the symbol “WSPD.” Beginning September 2014,2020, our common stock was listedquoted on the “OTC Pink Tier” of the OTC Markets under the symbol “DALP” on the OTCQB of OTC Markets.  Presently,“KTEL.” On December 14, 2020, our common stock is quotedwas approved for up-listing on the OTC Pink Tier underMarkets’ OTCQB® Venture Market or the symbol “DALP.”OTCQB Tier. No assurance can be given that any established trading market for our common stock will develop or be maintained.

For any market that develops for our common stock, the sale of “restricted securities” (common stock)shares of our common stock comprised of restricted securities pursuant to Rule 144 of the SEC, any other available exemption from registration under the Securities Act or by registration under the Securities Act by members of management or others, including any other person to whom any such securities may be issued in the future, may have a substantial adverse impact on any such public market.  For information regarding the requirements of resales under Rule 144, see the heading “Rule 144” of this itemItem below.

We have a limited public float of approximately 1,629,286 shares, with approximately 1,062,050 of these shares being reflected as “restricted securities,” and there has not been an “established trading market” in the Company’s

The common stock for many years.  Allthat can be acquired under vested and exercised incentive stock options that we have granted may also have an impact on any public trading market in our common stock. The shares underlying our 2018 Incentive Stock Option Plan have been registered with the SEC on Form S-8. See the heading “Outstanding Equity Awards” of the 1,062,050 shares reflected as being “restricted securities” have been held approximately three years and are believed to be freely tradeable under Rule 144 or Section 4(a)(1)caption “Executive Compensation” in Part III, Item 11 hereof, for a description of the Securities Act, based upon legal counsel’s advice. Becauseall of our current limited public float, among other unknown factors (seeoutstanding incentive stock options.

Also, see the heading “Risk“Risks Related to Our Common Stock” of the caption “Risk Factors” herein), the OTC Markets has refused to allow the Company’s common stock to be listed on its “OTCQB Tier,” and no new application can be filed for such a listing until on or about March 31, 2018.in Part I, Item 1A hereof.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated over the last two (2) years, the high and low closing bid quotations, as reported by the OTC Markets and OTCQB Markets, and represents prices between dealers, does not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions and may not represent actual transactions:

These prices were obtained from OTC Markets (www.OTCMarkets.com) and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions, retail markups, mark downs or commissions.

21

Rule 144

The following is a summary of the current requirements of Rule 144:144, including issues related to companies that are or have ever been a “shell company”:

Shell CompaniesHolders

The following is an excerpt from Rule 144(i) regarding resales of securities of shell companies:

“(i)  Unavailability to securities of issuers with no or nominal operations and no or nominal non-cash assets.

(1)

This section is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by an issuer defined below:

(i)  An issuer, other than a business combination related shell company, as defined in §230.405, or an asset-backed issuer, as defined in Item 1101(b) of Regulation AB (§229.1101(b) of this chapter), that has:

(A)

No or nominal operations; and

(B)

Either:

(1)  No or nominal assets;

(2)  Assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or

(3)  Assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets; or

(ii)

An issuer that has been at any time previously an issuer described in paragraph (i)(1)(i).

(2)

Notwithstanding paragraph (i)(1), if the issuer of the securities previously had been an issuer described in paragraph (i)(1)(i) but has ceased to be an issuer described in paragraph (i)(1)(i); is subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; has filed all reports and other materials required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issue was required to file such reports and materials), other than Form 8-K reports (§249.308 of this chapter); and has filed current “Form 10 information” with the Commission reflecting its status as an entity that is no longer an issuer described in paragraph (i)(1)(i), then those securities may be sold subject to the requirements of this section after one year has elapsed from the date that the issuer filed “Form 10 information” with the Commission.

22