UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020

Or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _________________

Commission file number 000-23446

SUGARMADE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 94-3008888
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

750 Royal Oaks Dr., Suite 108,  
Monrovia, CA 91016
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(888) 982-1628

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
N/AN/AN/A

Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes  No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer 
Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company 
  Emerging growth company 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity on June 30, 2018, (thestock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $12,807,404 as of December 31, 2019, the last business day of the registrant'sregistrant’s most recently completed quarter) based on the most recent closing trade, which occurred on November 12, 2018 was $0.102 with an implied market capsecond quarter.

The number of approximately $28.73M.

On November 23, 2018 there were 299,897,579 shares outstanding of the issuer'sregistrant’s common the only classstock outstanding as of common equity. This amount does not include shares to be issued.October 16, 2020 was 2,847,120,836.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None
 
 
 
 

Table of Contents

 

PART I

PART I
Item 1.    Business1
Item 1A. Risk Factors43
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments18
Item 2.    Properties1318
Item 3.    Legal Proceedings1318
Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures1318

PART II 
PART II
Item 5.     Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities1419
Item 6.     Selected Financial Data1524
Item 7.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations1625
Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk3032
Item 8.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data3033
Item 9.     Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure5963
Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures5963
Item 9B.   Other Information5965

PART III 
PART III
Item 10.   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance6265
Item 11.   Executive Compensation6366
Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters6467
Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions and Director Independence6568
Item 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services6569
Item 15.   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules6670
Item 16.   Form 10-K Summary70
SIGNATURES73

 

SIGNATURES67

 
 

SPECIAL NOTE OF CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

In addition to the historical information, thisThis Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-lookingcontains “forward-looking statements.” All statements within the meaningother than statements of Section 27Ahistorical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the Securities Actplans, strategies and objections of 1933, as amended, (the “1933 Act”)management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements or belief; and Section 21Eany statements of assumptions underlying any of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”). Those sections of the 1933 Act and 1934 Act provide a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their financial performance so long as they provide meaningful, cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ significantly from projected result. foregoing.

Forward-looking statements of Sugarmade, Inc. and its wholly-ownedour wholly owned active operating subsidiary, SWC Group, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”) include descriptions of the Company’s plans or objectives for future operations, products or services, and forecasts of its revenues, earnings or other measures of economic performance. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipates,” “project,” “assume,” “plan,” “predict,” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could” or “may.”

We makeThese forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made. Except for our compliance with ongoing securities laws, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update and forward-looking statement. Additionally, the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 most likely do not apply to our forward-looking statements as set forth abovea result of being a penny stock issuer. You should, however, consult further disclosures we make in future filings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and regardingCurrent Reports on Form 8-K.

Although we believe the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected sourcesor assumed in any of fundsour forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and the availabilityresults of acquisitionoperations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and growth opportunities. Forward-looking statements involve substantialinherent risks and uncertainties. The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties manyinclude, but are not limited to:

For a detailed description of which are difficult to predictthese and are generally beyond our control. There are manyother factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause our financial performance to differ materially from our goals, plans, expectations and projections expressed in any forward-looking statements include those set forth in our filings with the SEC,statement, please see Item 1A, ofRisk Factors, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the following:

For a more detailed discussion of some of the risk factors, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” below.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. The Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events and specifically disclaims any obligation to revise or update such forward looking statements for any reason, except as may be required by applicable law. You should consider any forward-looking statements in light of this explanation, and we caution you about relying on forward-looking statements.

document. 

 
 

PART I

Item 1.Business

Item 1.                Business

 

General

 

Our Company was originallySugarmade, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “we”, “us” or “the/our Company”) is a publicly-traded company incorporated on June 5, 1986 in California as Lab, Inc. and later changed its name to Software Professionals, Inc. During this time our Company was in the software solutions business, developing, marketing, and supporting software products designed to automate the management of computer systems for commercial concerns.  On May 21, 1996, our Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation changing its name to Enlighten Software Solutions, Inc.  During August 2001, our Company filed a Form 15 for the purpose of deregistering its securities.  On September 13, 2001, our Company filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 7, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California.  On November 2, 2004, the Trustee filed its Report of Distribution and on January 4, 2005 a final decree was entered and the case was closed.  On or near July 10, 2007, we filed the requisite documents with the State of California for the purpose of reinstating our corporate charter.  On July 30, 2007, our Company through a series of transactions effectively reincorporated in the state of Delaware, while retaining the capital structure and number of shares outstanding of theDelaware. Our previous California corporation.  On January 14, 2008, our Company officially changed itslegal name towas Diversified Opportunities, Inc.

On April 23, 2011, we entered into an exchange agreement (the Exchange Agreement) withOur Company, Sugarmade, Inc. operates much of its business activities through our subsidiary, SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation (Sugarmade-CA), which, as a result of the transactions contemplated in the Exchange Agreement, became our wholly-owned subsidiary. Under the terms of the Exchange Agreement, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Sugarmade-CA (the "Exchange"(“SWC’’). On May 9, 2011, ourSugarmade, Inc. was founded in 2010. In 2014, CarryOutSupplies.com was acquired by Sugarmade, Inc., creating the Company completed the Exchange.  Our Company then changed its name from Diversified Opportunities, Inc. to Sugarmade, Inc. on June 24, 2011. Under the terms of the Exchange Agreement, Sugarmade-CAs shareholders exchanged all of their shares of stock on a one-for-one basis for an aggregate of 8,864,108 sharesas it is today.

Shares of our common stock.  In connection withstock are quoted on the Exchange AgreementOTC Markets, which is a quotation system for early-stage and effective at the closing of the Exchange transaction, our previous three principal shareholders agreed to enter into a Share Cancellation Agreement pursuant to which 8,762,500 shares held by them were canceled or redeemed in exchange for our Companys payment of $210,000, the issuance of 200,000 warrants to purchase our common stock at $1.25 per share, and certain registration rights.  developing companies. Our trading symbol is “SGMD”. Our corporate website is www.Sugarmade.com.

 

We are headquartered in Monrovia, California, a suburb of Los Angeles, with an additional warehouse location in Southern California. As of the date of this filing, we employ 21 full and part-time workers and contractors.

As of the end of the reporting period, June 30, 2018, we wereare involved in several businesses including, business sectors and business ventures:

1) theThe supply of hydroponic and related agricultural supplies, 2) the supply ofconsumable products to the quick servicequick-service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry, and 3) as a marketeran importer of culinary seasoning products Seasoning Stixnon-medical personal protection equipment to business and Sriracha Seasoning Stix.

 -1-

Table of Contents

These are outlined below:

Hydroponic and Cultivation Supplies

Our primary business operation is the supply of hydroponic and indoor/outdoor cultivation products to the agricultural market sectors, including the legal cannabis cultivation, processing and distribution sectors. Our board of directors believes the Company has a significant market opportunity to act as a supplier to the legal cannabis cultivation, processing and distribution market sectors. We approach these markets as a supplier of products to legal market participants and do not engage in the business of cultivating, processing or distributing cannabis or any products that contain cannabis. While our primary focus has been on companies engaged in suchconsumers. This business operations, on the west coast of the United States, our business has significantly expanded as legal medical and recreational cannabis business activities have proliferated into many other states. While our businesswhich is rapidly expanding across most of the United States, California remains an important marketplace due both the sheer size of the State’s economy and due to the rapid embrace of legalization. We also believe the Company has strong revenue expansion opportunities within the retail hydroponic agricultural sector as these businesses are complementary to our current business. We are currently in process of analyzing several acquisitions for expansion in this area.

During December of 2017, we entered into a master marketing agreement with BizRight, LLC, a leading marketer and manufacturer of cannabis and hydroponic growth supplies, which offers a range of hydroponics-related products including: HPS grow lights, electronic ballasts, HPS Bulbs, nutrient mixes, environmental control products, pH measurement and calibration solutions and other cannabis-related grow and storage products. BizRight operates the ZenHydro.com website and other e-commerce properties, and sells various products to distributors and retailers. This relationship has allowed our Company to significantly expand our revenue growth prospects. As of the date of this filing, the Company has not issued any shares and/or other payments to BizRight, LLC under the master marketing agreement.

During the first quarter of calendar 2017, Sugarmade announced the signing of an exclusive distribution agreement for California, Oregon and Washington with privately held Plantation Corp. for its breakthrough BudLife preservation technology based on integration of specialized gases and natural agents that dramatically extends the useful life of medical marijuana up to six (6) months by actively monitoring the internal containers environment and automatically adjusting its atmosphere as needed. Sugarmade has conducted initial product prototype testing of the BudLife product, realizing positive results. Sugarmade plans to move forward as Plantation’s distribution partner upon availability of the BudLife product line.

Quick Service Restaurant Suppliers

Sugarmade is also a significant supplier to the quick service restaurant sector of the overall restaurant industry. We plan to continue our business pursuits relative to our CarryOutSuppies.com business, whichcalled CarryOutSupplies.com, is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies, servicing more than 2,000 quick servicequick-service restaurants. Our products include double poly paper cups for cold beverage; disposable, clear, plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, edible packaging, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons, and many other similar products for this market sector. CarryOutSupplies.com was founded in 2009. Our products are viewable on our website: www.CarryOutSupplies.com. We have recently expanded the CarryOutSupplies.com operation to include non-medical personal protective equipment, which we also offer via our website. Additional information on CarryOutSupplies.com is provided in the “Business” section, of this filing. Additionally, please reference our section “Risks to our Business”, provided in this filing for an outline of the risk factors associated with this business operation.

2) As an investor in the Budcars licensed cannabis delivery service brand (“Budcars”) and as a joint owner and joint operator in Budcar’s first operating location in Sacramento, California. During early 2020, the Company gained a 40% stake in the Budcars Brand and in the Sacramento delivery operations via acquiring a 40% stake in Indigo Dye Group (“Indigo”). Under the terms of the agreement with Indigo, Sugaramade acquired an option to purchase an additional 30% interest in Budcars, upon which will provide the Company with a controlling interest. As of the date of this filing, the option has not yet been exercise and the Company’s stake in Budcars is at 40%. Additional information on markets in which Budcars operates is provided in the “Business” section, of this filing. Reference our section “Risks to our Business”, provided in this filing for an outline of the risk factors associated with this business operation.

3) The Company is in process of expanding its business to include the licensed and regulated cultivation of cannabis. On September 28, 2020, the Company and LMK Capital LLC (“LMK”) entered into a lease agreement where LMK agreed to lease to the Company five acres located in Northern California. The property is owned by LMK. Jimmy Chan, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and majority stockholder of the Company, is the majority owner of LMK. This transaction is considered at Related Party transaction under SEC Regulation SK. The Company plans to cultivate cannabis on the property which it will market as both white-label and branded cannabis products; also likely to be distributed through the BudCars Cannabis Delivery Service. Sugarmade is currently Company preparing the required documentation to apply for approval for construction of greenhouses, processing building, and other licenses as may be required. This new business for the Company, is still in the formative stages and has yet to produce any revenues. There is no assurance the operation will produce any revenues or profits for the Company. Additional information on markets targeted for this business operation is provided in the “Business” section, of this filing. Reference our section “Risks to our Business”, provided in this filing for an outline of the risk factors associated with this proposed business operation.

 

 -2--1-

 Table of Contents

Culinary Seasonings

As4) We have also entered into an option agreement for lease arrangement for a property in Sacramento, California, which is planned as a licensed cannabis cultivation facility.  Under the terms of the end of the reporting period, June 30, 2018, Sugarmade was also a distributor of culinary seasoning products Sriracha Stix and Seasoning Stix. During September of 2016,agreement, the Company completed negotiationswill apply for State of California and signed an agreement with HUY FONG FOODS, INC. (“HFFI”), the maker of Sriracha Hot Chili Sauce, under which the Company became a party to a license with HGGI gaining permission from HFFIlocal jurisdiction permits and licenses to use the licensed markslocation as a cannabis cultivation site.  Upon granting of all licenses and permits, the lease will commence.  The Company is still undergoing licensing and permitting review; thus operations relative to this site have not yet begun. There is no guarantee that the Company will commence using this location as a cannabis cultivation site. In addition, there is no guarantee that, if this occurs, the business line will be successful.

Government Regulations

Our business lines are not directly affected by government regulations, however, the Bud Cars line of business is highly dependent upon demand for the limitedcannabis products and purposes permittedtherefore could be affected by governmental regulations of cannabis products.

Environmental

We are subject to various federal, state, local and non-U.S. laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the discharge, treatment, storage, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and wastes. We continually assess our compliance status and management of environmental matters to ensure our operations are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations. Investigation, remediation, operation and maintenance costs associated with environmental compliance and management of sites are a normal, recurring part of our operations. These costs often are allowable costs under our contracts with the U.S. government. It is reasonably possible that continued environmental compliance could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows if additional work requirements or more stringent clean-up standards are imposed by regulators, new areas of soil and groundwater contamination are discovered and/or expansions of work scope are prompted by the license. Based on this agreement and a separate marketing and sales agreement signed with Seasoning Stixs International, LLC, the Company markets a culinary seasoning product named Sriracha Seasoning Stixs. Sriracha Seasoning Stixs are encapsulated Huy Fong Sriracha Sauce and other seasonings in the formresults of a stick, which are inserted into meat, fish and poultry prior to cooking. All trademarks, service marks and intellectual property remain the property of the respective owners.

During the first calendar quarter of 2018, our management team and our board of directors determined the business operation of acting as a distributor of paper products derived from non-wood sources was no longer strategic to the Company and thus, this business operation was discontinued.

As of the end of the second calendar quarter of 2018, our management team and our board of directors determined the business operation of acting as a marketer and distributor of culinary seasoning products Seasoning Stix and Sriracha Seasoning Stix was no longer strategic to the Company and thus this business operation was terminated in order to focus all corporate resources in hydroponic-related and quick services restaurant-related areas.

In the future, we plan to continue to concentrate primarily on the hydroponic and cultivation market place, in addition to the quick service restaurant supply sector. In addition, we are currently analyzing expanding our business operations into the hydroponic and cultivation retail sector via direct acquisitions of participants in that market sector. investigations.

 

Employees and Consultants

 

As of June 30, 2018,2020, the Company had approximately seven (7) employees.8 full and part-time workers and 5 independent contractors .

 

Available Information

 

We fileAny annual, quarterly, and currentspecial reports information statements and other information filed with the SecuritiesSEC can be inspected and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Thecopied at the public may obtain informationreference facility maintained by calling the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549-0405. Information regarding the public reference facilities may be obtained from the SEC by telephoning 1-800-SEC-0330. The SECCompany’s filings are also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxyavailable through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically withRetrieval System which is publicly available through the SEC. The addressSEC’s website (www.sec.gov).  Copies of that site is www.sec.gov. For quarterly and annual reports, only those reports that were required tosuch materials may also be filed through June 30, 2018 are available asobtained by mail from the public reference section of the date of this report.SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405 at prescribed rates.

 

 -3--2-

 Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

RISK FACTORS

Cautionary Statements

 

The discussions and information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain both historical and forward-looking statements. To the extent that the Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements regarding the financial condition, operating results, business prospects, or any other aspect of our business, please be advised that our actual financial condition, operating results, and business performance may differ materially from that projected or estimated by us in forward-looking statements. We have attempted to identify, in context, certain of the factors we currently believe may cause actual future experience and results to differ from our current expectations.

 

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

 

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm expresses substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm expresses substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors, L&L CPAs, have indicated in their report on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018,2020, that conditions exist that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to our recurring losses from operations and substantial decline in our working capital. A “going concern” opinion could impair our ability to finance our operations through the sale of equity, incurring debt, or other financing alternatives. Our ability to continue as a going concern will depend upon the availability and terms of future funding, continued growth, improved operating margins and our ability to profitably meet service commitments. If we are unable to achieve these goals, our business would be jeopardized and the Company may not be able to continue. If we ceased operations, it is likely that all of our investors would lose their investment.

 

We face risks associated with strategic acquisitions.

 

Our business strategy includes strategically acquisitions of businesses and assets, some of which may be material. We plan to investigate and acquire strategic businesses with the potential to be accretive to earnings, increase our market penetration, brand strength and our market position or enhancement our existing product offerings. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify or successfully complete transactions with suitable acquisition candidates in the future.

 

These acquisitions may involve a number of financial, accounting, managerial, operational, legal, compliance and other risks and challenges, including the following, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations:

 

Any acquired business could under-perform relative to our expectations and the price that we paid for it, or not perform in accordance with our anticipated timetable;

We may incur or assume significant debt in connection with our acquisitions;

Acquisitions could cause our results of operations to differ from our own or the investment community’s expectations in any given period, or over the long term; and

Acquisitions could create demands on our management that we may be unable to effectively address, or for which we may incur additional costs.

 

 -4--3-

 Table of Contents

Additionally, if we were to undertake a substantial acquisition, the acquisition would likely need to be financed in part through additional financing from banks, through possible public offerings or private placements of debt or equity securities or through other arrangements. There can be no assurance that the necessary acquisition financing would be available to us on acceptable terms if and when required.

 

Acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, which could adversely affect our operating results. We may also unknowingly inherit liabilities from acquired businesses or assets that arise after the acquisition and that are not adequately covered by indemnities. Following any business acquisition, we could experience difficulty in integrating personnel, operations, financial and other systems, and in retaining key employees and customers. In addition, if an acquired business fails to meet our expectations, our operating results, business and financial position may suffer.

 

In addition, a significant portion of the purchase price of companies we acquire may be allocated to acquired goodwill and other intangible assets, which must be assessed for impairment at least annually. We may record goodwill and other intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheet in connection with our acquisitions. If we are not able to realize the value of these assets, we may be required to incur charges relating to the impairment of these assets, which could materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We may have difficulties integrating acquisitions or identifying new acquisitions.

 

A major part of our strategy is to grow through acquisition. However, we may be unable to identify and consummate additional acquisitions or may be unable to successfully integrate and manage the product lines or businesses that we have recently acquired or may acquire in the future. In addition, we may be unable to achieve a substantial portion of any anticipated cost savings from acquisitions or other anticipated benefits in the timeframe we anticipate, or at all. Moreover, any acquired product lines or businesses may require a greater than anticipated amount of trade, promotional and capital spending. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, services and products of the acquired companies, personnel turnover and the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. Any inability by us to integrate and manage any product lines or businesses that we have recently acquired or may acquire in the future in a timely and efficient manner, any inability to achieve a substantial portion of any anticipated cost savings or other anticipated benefits from these acquisitions in the time frame we anticipate or any unanticipated required increases in trade, promotional or capital spending could adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Moreover, future acquisitions by us could result in our incurring substantial additional indebtedness, being exposed to contingent liabilities or incurring the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, all of which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

 

Financial market conditions may impede our access to, or increase the cost of, financing for acquisitions.

Any future financial market disruptions or tightening of the credit markets, may make it more difficult for us to obtain financing for acquisitions or increase the cost of obtaining financing. In addition, our borrowing costs can be affected by short and long-term debt ratings assigned by independent rating agencies that are based, in significant part, on our performance as measured by credit metrics such as interest coverage and leverage ratios. A decrease in these ratings could increase our cost of borrowing or make it more difficult for us to obtain financing.

We may need additional capital in the future, which could dilute the ownership of current shareholders or we may be unable to secure additional funding in the future or to obtain such funding on favorable terms.

 

 -5-

Table of Contents

Historically, we have raised equity capital, including debt convertible into equity capital, to support and expand our operations. To the extent that we raise additional equity capital, existing shareholders will experience a dilution in the voting power and ownership of their common stock,shares of Common Stock, and earnings per share, if any, would be negatively impacted. Our inability to use our equity securities to finance our operations could materially limit our growth. Any borrowings made to finance operations could make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our operating results, a downturn in economic conditions, or increases in interest rates on borrowings that are subject to interest rate fluctuations. The amount and timing of such additional financing needs will vary principally depending on the timing of new product launches, investments and/or acquisitions, and the amount of cash flow from our operations. If our resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to issue additional equity or debt securities or obtain a credit facility. If our cash flow from operations is insufficient to meet ourany debt service requirements, we could be required to sell additional equity securities, refinance our obligations, or dispose of assets in order to meet debt service requirements. There can be no assurance that any financing will be available to us when needed or will be available on terms acceptable to us. Our inabilityfailure to obtain sufficient financing on favorable terms and conditions could have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 -4-

Table of Contents

Uncertainty of profitability

Our business strategy may result in increased volatility of revenues, loses and/or earnings. As we will only develop a limited number of products at a time, our overall success will depend on a limited number of products, which may cause variability and unsteady profits and losses depending on the products and/or services offered and their market acceptance.

Our revenues and our profitability may be adversely affected by economic conditions and changes in the market for our products. Our business is also subject to general economic risks that could adversely impact the results of operations and financial condition.

Because of the anticipated nature of the products that we offer and attempt to develop, it is difficult to accurately forecast revenues and operating results and these items could fluctuate in the future due to a number of factors. These factors may include, among other things, the following:

·Our ability to raise sufficient capital to take advantage of opportunities and generate sufficient revenues to cover expenses.
·Our ability to source strong opportunities with sufficient risk adjusted returns.
·Our ability to manage our capital and liquidity requirements based on changing market conditions.
·The amount and timing of operating and other costs and expenses.
·The nature and extent of competition from other companies that may reduce market share and create pressure on pricing and investment return expectations.

We cannot guarantee that we will succeed in achieving our goals, and our failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results

Some of business initiatives in the hydroponic sector are new and are only in early stages of commercialization. As is typical in a new and rapidly evolving industry, demand and market acceptance for recently introduced products and services are subject to a high level of uncertainty and risk. Because the market for our Company is new and evolving, it is difficult to predict with any certainty the size of this market and its growth rate, if any. We cannot guarantee that a market for our Company will develop or that demand for our products will emerge or be sustainable. If the market fails to develop, develops more slowly than expected or becomes saturated with competitors, our business, financial condition and operating results would be materially adversely affected.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by global health epidemics, including the recent COVID-19 outbreak.

Outbreaks of epidemic, pandemic, or contagious diseases such as COVID-19, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The spread of COVID-19 from China to other countries has resulted in the World Health Organization declaring the outbreak of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. The slow-down in the global economy and the reduced levels of international and domestic travel experienced since the beginning of January would affect our business adversely. The Any resulting financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The extent to which the COVID-19 impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus and the actions taken globally to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others. Existing insurance coverage may not provide protection for all costs that may arise from all such possible events. We are still assessing our business operations and the impact COVID-19 may have on our results and financial condition, but there can be no assurance that this analysis will enable us to avoid part or all of any impact from the spread of COVID-19 or its consequences, including downturns in business sentiment generally or in our sector in particular.

 -5-

Table of Contents

We have incurred losses since our inception, have yet to achieve profitable operations and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

Even if we obtain more customers or increase sales to our existing customers, there is no guarantee we will be able to generate a profit. Because we are a small company and have limited capital, we must limit our products and services. Because we will be limiting our marketing activities, we may not be able to attract enough customers to buy our products to operate profitably. Further, we are subject to raw material pricing which can erode the profitability of our products and put additional negative pressure on profitability. If we cannot operate profitably, we may have to suspend or cease operations.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 we incurred an operating loss of $21,534,562. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, we incurred an operating loss of $4,915,077. At June 30, 2020 we had an accumulated deficit of $68,703,772. Although we have generated substantial revenues, they are insufficient to make the Company profitable. We plan to increase our expenses associated with the development of our business. There is no assurance we will be able to derive revenues from the development of our business to successfully achieve positive cash flow or that our business will be successful. If we achieve profitability, we may be unable to sustain or increase profits on a quarterly or annual basis.

We do not have sufficient cash on hand.

As of June 30, 2020, we had $441,004 cash on hand. These cash resources are not sufficient for us to execute our business plan. If we do not generate sufficient cash from our intended financing activities and sales, we will be unable to continue our operations. We estimate that within the next 12 months we will need at least $5,000,000 in cash from either investors or operations. While we intend to engage in several equity or debt financings, there is no assurance that these will actually occur. Nor can we assure our shareholders that we will not be required to obtain additional financing on terms that are dilutive of their interests. You should recognize that if we are unable to generate sufficient revenues or obtain debt or equity financing, we will not be able to earn profits and may not be able to continue operations.

The success of our new and existing products and services is uncertain.

 

We expect to continue to commit significant resources and capital to develop and market existing and new products, services and enhancements. These products and services are relatively untested, and there is no assurance that we will achieve market acceptance for these products and services, or other new products and services that we may offer in the future. Moreover, these and other new products and services may face significant competition with new and existing competitors. In addition, new products, services and enhancements may pose a variety of technical challenges and require us to attract additional qualified employees. The failure to successfully develop and market these new products, services or enhancements could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we are subject to raw material pricing which can erode the profitability of our products and put additional negative pressure on profitability. Moreover, if we fail to accurately project demand for our new or existing products, we may encounter problems of overproduction or underproduction which would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as damage our reputation and brand.

 

 -6-

Table of Contents

Third-party suppliers could fail to fulfill our orders for parts used to assemble our products, which would disrupt our business, increase our costs, harm our reputation, and potentially cause us to lose our market.

 

We depend on international third-party suppliers, including in The People’s Republic of China, for materials used to assemble our products. Changing federal tariffs could adversely affect our international third-party suppliers. We cannot predict the nature of any future tariffs, laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative policies and procedures, when and if promulgated, could have on our suppliers and our business. These suppliers could increase prices to us, fail to produce products to our specifications or in a workmanlike manner and may not deliver the material or products on a timely basis. Our suppliers may also have to obtain inventories of the necessary parts and tools for production. Any change in our suppliers’ approach to tariffs or resolving production issues could disrupt our ability to fulfill orders and could also disrupt our business due to delays in finding new suppliers, providing specifications and testing initial production. Such disruptions in our business and/or delays in fulfilling orders would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as damage our reputation and brand.

 

 -6-

Table of Contents

Even if we expand our customer base, there is no assurance that we will continue to make a profit.

 

Our revenue growth has been derived from the sale of our products. Our success and the planned growth and expansion of our business depend on us achieving greater and broader acceptance of our products and expanding our customer base. There can be no assurance that customers will purchase our products or that we will continue to expand our customer base. If we are unable to effectively market or expand our product offerings, we will be unable to grow and expand our business or implement our business strategy. Even if we obtain more customers, there is no guarantee that we will be able to continue to generate a profit. Because we have limited capital, we may be required to limit our products and services. Because we will be limiting our marketing activities, we may not be able to attract enough customers to buy our products to operate profitably. If we cannot market our new and existing products and services profitably, we may have to limit or suspend or cease operations.

 

IfEven if we are able to expand our business operations, we may be unable to successfully manage our future growth.

 

If we are able to continue expanding our operations, we may experience periods of rapid growth that will require additional resources. Any such growth could place increased strain on our management, operational, financial and other resources, and we will need to train, motivate, and manage employees, as well as attract management, sales, finance and accounting, international, technical, and other professionals. In addition, we will need to expand the scope of our infrastructure and develop further physical resources. Any failure to expand these areas and implement appropriate procedures and controls in an efficient manner and at a pace consistent with the business objectives could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

 

Our inability to effectively manage our growth could harm our business and materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

 

Our strategy envisions growing our business. We plan to expand our product, sales, administrative and marketing operations. Any growth in or expansion of our business is likely to continue to place a strain on our management and administrative resources, infrastructure and systems. As with other growing businesses, we expect that we will need to further refine and expand our business development capabilities, our systems and processes and our access to financing sources. We also will need to hire, train, supervise, and manage new employees. These processes are time consuming and expensive, will increase management responsibilities and will divert management attention.

 

 -7-

Table of Contents

If we do not successfully generate additional products and services, or if such products and services are developed but not successfully commercialized, we could lose revenue opportunities.

 

Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to expand our product and service offerings. To that end we have engaged in the process of identifying new product opportunities to provide additional products and related services to our customers. The processes of identifying and commercializing new products is complex and uncertain, and if we fail to accurately predict customers’ changing needs and emerging trends, our business could be harmed. We have already and may have to continue to commit significant resources to commercializing new products before knowing whether our investments will result in products the market will accept. Furthermore, we may not execute successfully on commercializing those products because of errors in product planning or timing, technical hurdles that we fail to overcome in a timely fashion, or a lack of appropriate resources. This could result in competitors providing those solutions before we do and a reduction in net sales and earnings.

 

The success of new products depends on several factors, including proper new product definition, timely completion, and introduction of these products, differentiation of new products from those of our competitors, and market acceptance of these products. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify additional new product opportunities, develop and bring new products to market in a timely manner, or achieve market acceptance of our products or that products and technologies developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.

  

Our business may suffer if we are unable to attract or retain talented personnel.

Our success will depend in large measure on the abilities, expertise, judgment, discretion, integrity and good faith of Management, as well as other personnel. We have a small management team, and the loss of a key individual or our inability to attract suitably qualified replacements or additional staff could adversely affect our business. Our success also depends on the ability of Management to form and maintain key commercial relationships within the marketplace. No assurance can be given that key personnel will continue their association or employment with us or that replacement personnel with comparable skills will be found. If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel and additional employees, our business may be adversely affected. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on any of our executive employees.

The loss of key management personnel could adversely affect our business

We depend on the continued services of our executive officers and senior management team as they work closely with independent associate leaders and are responsible for our day-to-day operations. Our success depends in part on our ability to retain our executive officers, to compensate our executive officers at attractive levels, and to continue to attract additional qualified individuals to our management team. Although we have entered into employment agreements with our senior management team, and do not believe that any of them are planning to leave or retire in the near term, we cannot assure you that our senior managers will remain with us. The loss or limitation of the services of any of our executive officers or members of our senior management team, or the inability to attract additional qualified management personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or independent associate relations.

 -7--8-

 Table of Contents

We willThe lack of available and cost-effective directors and officer’s insurance coverage in our industry may cause us to be requiredunable to attract and retain top quality talentqualified executives, and this may result in our inability to competefurther develop our business.

Our business depends on attracting independent directors, executives and senior management to advance our business plans. We currently do not have directors and officer’s insurance to protect our directors, officers and the company against to possible third-party claims. This is due to the significant lack availability of such policies in the marketplace.cannabis industry at reasonably competitive prices. As a result, the Company and our executive directors and officers are susceptible to liability claims arising by third parties, and as a result, we may be unable to attract and retain qualified independent directors and executive management causing the development of our business plans to be impeded as a result.

If we fail to maintain satisfactory relationships with our larger customers, our business may be harmed. 

 

We believedo not have and are unlikely to enter into long-term fixed quantity supply agreements with our customers. Due to competition or other factors, we could lose future business from our customers, either partially or completely. The future loss of one or more of our significant customers or a substantial future reduction of orders by any of our significant customers could harm our business and results of operations. Moreover, our customers may vary their order levels significantly from period to period and customers may not continue to place orders with us in the future at the same levels as in prior periods. In the event that in the future we lose any of our larger customers, we may not be able to replace that revenue source. This could harm our financial results.

Management of growth and successwill be necessary for us to be competitive

Successful expansion of our business will depend in part on our ability to effectively attract and retain highlymanage staff, strategic business relationships, and shareholders. Specifically, we will need to hire skilled managerial, product development, sales,management and marketing,technical personnel as well as manage partnerships to navigate shifts in the general economic environment. Expansion has the potential to place significant strains on financial, management, and finance personnel.operational resources, yet failure to expand will inhibit our profitability goals.

We import many of our products from Asian counties, including the People’s Republic of China. Disruptions or a change in the tariff situation may negatively affect our business

Many of the products we market are manufactured in Asian countries and are then imported to our facilities in the United States and ultimately sold to our customers. There can be no assurance of success in attractingthe reliability of such channels and retaining such personnel. Shortages in qualified personnel could limitdisruption would likely have a significant impact on our business operations, our ability to increase sales of existing products,retain customers and services and launch new products and service offerings. We may also experience an adverse impact on our operations and revenues if acquisition or integration activities disrupt key customer and supplier relationships or if we fail to retain, motivate and integrate key management and other employees of acquired businesses.

If we fail to retain key personnel and hire, train and retain qualified employees, we may not be able to compete effectively, which could result in reduced revenue or increased costs.

Our success is highly dependent on the continued services of our key management and technical personnel. Our management and other employees may voluntarily terminate their employment at any time upon short notice. The loss of the services of any member of the senior management team or any of the managerial or technical staff may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of product development, our growth strategies and other business objectives. Our future success will also depend on our ability to identify, recruit and retain additional qualified technical and managerial personnel. We operategenerate profits. A significant change in several geographic locations where labor markets are particularly competitive, where demand for personnel with these skills is extremely high and is likely to remain high. As a result, competition for qualified personnel is intense, particularly in the areas of general management, finance, engineering and science. The process of hiring suitably qualified personnel is often lengthy, and expensive, and may become more expensive in the future. If we are unable to hire and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, our ability to conduct and expand our business would materially and adverselytrade tariffs could also negatively affect our business financial condition and results of operations, as well as damage our reputation and brand.operations.

 

If product liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us, we will incur substantial liabilities.

 

From time to time, we may receive complaints from customers regarding our goods and services. We may become subject to product liability lawsuits from customers alleging injury because of a purported defect in our products or services, claiming substantial damages and demanding payments from us. Liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability and a breach of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts. We may be in the chain of ownership when we supply or distributes products, and therefore is subject to the risk of being held legally responsible for such products. Given the nature of these products (including their relation to cannabis or for other reasons), these claims may not be subject to insurance coverage or covered by insurance policies. Any resulting litigation, regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, could decrease demand for our products, result in product recalls or withdrawals, be costly, divert management attention, result in increased costs of doing business, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Any litigation or even negative publicity generated as a result of customer frustration or disagreement with the products or services could damage our reputation and diminish the value of our brand name, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

 

 -8--9-

 Table of Contents

SPECIFIC RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS AS A SUPPLIER OF TECHNOLOGIES AND PRODUCTS THAT SUPPORT THE LEGAL CULTIVATION AND PROCESSING OF CANNABISWe cannot guarantee that we will succeed in achieving our goals, and our failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results

 

Because certainSome of our business plans involve supplying technologiesinitiatives in the hydroponic sector are new and are only in early stages of commercialization. As is typical in a new and rapidly evolving industry, demand and market acceptance for recently introduced products that support the legal cultivation and processing of cannabis and other agricultural products in those states that permit it, weservices are particularly subject to a high level of uncertainty and risk. Because the social, political and economic risks of doing business in those states.

Althoughmarket for our Company is currently not engaged innew and evolving, it is difficult to predict with any business operations involvingcertainty the actual cultivation, processingsize of this market and its growth rate, if any. We cannot guarantee that a market for our Company will develop or sale of any cannabis product, we are involved inthat demand for our products will emerge or be sustainable. If the manufacturing and distribution of products and technologies that support the legal cultivation and processing of cannabis and other agricultural products. As such, circumstances and developments relatedmarket fails to operations in these markets that could negatively affectdevelop, develops more slowly than expected or becomes saturated with competitors, our business, financial condition liquidity and operating results would be materially adversely affected.

RISKS OF GOVERNMENT ACTION AND REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY

The Farm Bill recently passed, and undeveloped shared state-federal regulations over hemp cultivation and production may impact our business.

The Farm Bill was signed into law on December 20, 2018. Under Section 10113 of operations include, butthe Farm Bill, state departments of agriculture must consult with the state’s governor and chief law enforcement officer to devise a plan that must be submitted to the Secretary of USDA. A state’s plan to license and regulate hemp can only commence once the Secretary of USDA approves that state’s plan. In states opting not to devise a hemp regulatory program, USDA will need to construct a regulatory program under which hemp cultivators in those states must apply for licenses and comply with a federally-run program. The details and scopes of each state’s plans are not limited to,known at this time and may contain varying regulations that may impact our business. Even if a state creates a plan in conjunction with its governor and chief law enforcement officer, the following factors:Secretary of the USDA must approve it. There can be no guarantee that any state plan will be approved. Review times may be extensive. There may be amendments and the ultimate plans, if approved by states and the USDA, may materially limit our business depending upon the scope of the regulations.

 

the responsibility of complying with multiple and, in some respects, conflicting state and federal laws in the United States, including with respect to the manufacturing and distribution of products and technologies that support the legal cultivation and processing of cannabis and other agricultural products;
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing operations;
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and other laws;
potentially adverse tax consequences;
the state medical and/or recreational-use cannabis market fails to develop and grow in ways that we or our customers projected;
the impact of national, regional or state specific business cycles and economic instability; and
access to capital may be more restricted, or unavailable on favorable terms or at all in certain locations.

Laws and regulations affecting our industry to be developed under the Farm Bill are in development

 

WhileAs a result of the Farm Bill’s recent passage, there will be a constant evolution of laws and regulations affecting the hemp industry could detrimentally affect our operations. Local, state and federal hemp laws and regulations may be broad in scope and subject to changing interpretations. These changes may require us to incur substantial costs associated with legal and compliance fees and ultimately require us to alter our business plan. Furthermore, violations of these laws, or alleged violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, we do not produce, process, distributecannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or sell any products containing cannabis or cannabis containing substances, someapplications, and it is possible that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to our business.

 -10-

Table of our customer may use our products for such purposes. Contents

U.S. Federal and foreign regulation and enforcement may adversely affect the implementation of marijuanacannabis laws and regulations and may negatively impact our revenue, and profit, or we may be found to be violating the Controlled Substances Act or other U.S. federal, state, or foreign laws.

Even though we do not cultivate, process, market or distribute cannabis or any products that contain cannabis, some of our customers do engage in such activities. Cannabis, as not strictly defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, is a Schedule-I controlled substance and is illegal under federal law. Even in those states where the use of cannabis, as not strictly defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, has been legalized, its use remains a violation of federal law. A Schedule I controlled substance is defined as a substance that has no currently accepted medical use in the United States, a lack of safety for use under medical supervision and a high potential for abuse. The Department of Justice defines Schedule 1 controlled substances as “the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence.”

Currently, twenty-nineAt present, numerous states and the District of Columbia permit some formallow their citizens to use medical cannabis. Additionally, many states have approved legalization of whole-plant cannabis, use and cultivation eitheras not strictly defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, for medical oradult recreational use. ManyThe laws of these states relative to cannabis as wellnot strictly defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, are in conflict with the Federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes cannabis, as others, allow or are considering legislation to allownot strictly defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, use and possession and use of non-psychoactive cannabidiol (“CBD”) oil for some medical conditions only. There are efforts in many other states to begin permitting cannabis use and/or cultivation in various contexts, and it has been reported that several states are actively considering bills to permit recreational use or to decriminalize the use of marijuana. Nevertheless,illegal on a national level. If the federal government continuesdecides to prohibit cannabis in all its forms as well as its derivatives. Underenforce the federal Controlled Substances Act (the “CSA”),with respect to cannabis, as not strictly defined in the policy2018 Farm Bill, persons that are charged with distributing, possessing with intent to distribute, or growing cannabis, as not strictly defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, could be subject to fines and regulationsimprisonment. Any such change in the federal government’s enforcement of current federal laws will cause significant financial damage to us.

The approach to the enforcement of cannabis laws may be subject to change, which creates uncertainty for our business.

As a result of the conflicting views between state legislatures and the federal government regarding cannabis, as not strictly defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, investments in, and its agencies is that cannabis has no medical benefit, and a range of activities including cultivation and usethe operations of, cannabis is prohibited.

Marijuana remains illegal under federal law. It is a Schedule I controlled substance. Evenbusinesses in those jurisdictions in which the use of medical marijuana has been legalized at the state level, its prescription is a violation of federal law. The policyU.S. are subject to inconsistent laws and regulations. Laws and regulations ofaffecting the federal governmentcannabis industry are constantly changing, which could detrimentally affect our operations. Local, state and its agencies is that cannabis has no medical benefit and a range of activities including cultivation and use of cannabis for personal use is prohibited on the basis of federal law and may or may not be permitted on the basis of state law. Active enforcement of the current federal regulatory position on cannabis in the states we operate in may impact our success. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that it is the federal government that has the right to regulate and criminalize cannabis, even for medical purposes. Therefore, federal law criminalizing the use of marijuana trumps state laws that legalize its use for even medicinal purposes.

 -9-

Table of Contents

Regarding federal enforcement, on August 29, 2013 James Cole, the US Deputy Attorney General, issued the “Cole Memo” titled “Guidance Regarding Marijuana Enforcement” which provided guidance to federal prosecutors concerning marijuana enforcement under the CSA (both civil and criminal enforcement). The Cole Memo guided federal prosecutors and states that industry participants should be able to move forward without fear of federal prosecution so long as the states implement "strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems", subject to eight enforcement areas which the Department of Justice should prioritize when targeting marijuana businesses, including but not limited to money-laundering and sales to minors. In February 2014, the U.S. Treasury and Department of Justice provided guidance intended to give banks confidence that they can transact business and maintain accounts for marijuana businesses in states where marijuana is legal. However, many banks were reluctant to do so. Following the election of President Donald J. Trump and his appointment of Jeff Sessions to the position of Attorney General of the United States, there has been a shift in federal marijuana policy. On January 1, 2018 Jeff Sessions rescinded the Cole memo. As of today, the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment, a federal law designed to “prevent such State[s] from implementing their own State laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana,” is set to expire on January 19, 2018 and it remains unclear if it will be extended. Given these shifts in federal marijuana policy, we continue to face unknown and unquantifiable risk regarding possible federal enforcement actions. We are not insulated from economic risks that would arise if such enforcement action were undertaken and we can provide no certainty on how we and our shareholders would fair if subject to federal prosecution or legal action. Active enforcement of the current federal regulatory position on cannabis in the states that we operate in may impact our success.

Further, state cannabis laws and regulations are relatively newbroad in scope and constantlysubject to evolving so there are uncertainties asinterpretations, which could require us to howincur substantial costs associated with compliance or alter our business plan. In addition, violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our operations. It is also possible that regulations may be enacted in the state authoritiesfuture that will interpret and administerbe directly applicable regulatory requirementsto our business. These ever-changing regulations could even affect federal tax policies that may be inconsistent with federal law.make it difficult to claim tax deductions on our returns. We cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative policies and procedures, when and if promulgated, could have on our business.

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH BANK AND INSURANCE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

The risk of strict federal enforcement of the CSA in light of congressional activity, judicial holdings,We and stated federal policy, including enforcement priorities, remains uncertain. Thus, such additional enforcement could affect our customers and thus or revenue indirectly.

While we do not produce, process, distribute or sell any products containing cannabis or cannabis containing substances, some of our customers may use our products for such purposes. The U.S. Treasury Department issued guidance (which is not law) with respect to financial institutions providing banking services to cannabis business, including burdensome due diligence expectations and reporting requirements. This guidance does not provide any safe harbors or legal defenses from examination or regulatory or criminal enforcement actions by the Department of Justice, FinCEN or other federal regulators. Thus, most banks and other financial institutions do not appear to be comfortable providing banking services to cannabis-related businesses, or relying on this guidance, which can be amended or revoked or reviewed at any time by the Trump Administration. While we do not engage in any financial transactions involving proceeds generated by cannabis-related businesses, some of our customer may engage in such transactions. In addition to the foregoing, banks may refuse to process debit card payments and credit card companies generally refuse to process credit card payments for cannabis-related businesses.

 -10-

Table of Contents

Our clients may have difficulty accessing the service of banks, which may make it difficult for them to purchasesell our products and services.services and manage our cashflows.

As discussed above,Since the use of marijuanacommerce in cannabis, as not strictly defined in the 2018 Farm Bill, is illegal under federal law. Therefore, there arelaw, federally most chartered banks that will not accept for deposit funds from the derived from orbusinesses involved with cannabis. Consequently, businesses involved in connection with the cannabis sale, distribution and/or cultivationindustry often have trouble finding a bank willing to accept their business. The inability to open bank accounts may make it difficult for our customers to operate. There does appears to be recent movement to allow state-chartered banks and credit unions to provide banking to the industry, but as of the date of this report there are only nominal entities that have been formed that offer these services. Further, in a February 6, 2018, Forbes article, United States Secretary of the Treasury, Steven Mnuchin, is reported to have testified that his department is “reviewing the existing guidance.” But he clarified that he doesn’t want to rescind it without having an alternate policy in place to address public safety concerns.

 -11-

Table of Contents

Financial transactions involving proceeds generated by cannabis-related conduct can form the basis for prosecution under the federal money laundering statutes, unlicensed money transmitter statute and the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act. Despite guidance from the U.S. Department of the Treasury suggesting it may choose notbe possible for financial institutions to do businessprovide services to cannabis-related businesses consistent with our clients. Although certain members of Congress are seeking amendmentstheir obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks remain hesitant to federaloffer banking regulationsservices to permit banks to transact business with state-authorized recreational and medical marijuana-relatedcannabis-related businesses. Consequently, those businesses there can be no assurance such legislation will be successful, that banks will decide to do business with authorized recreational and medical marijuana-related businesses, or thatinvolved in the absence of legislation statecannabis industry continue to encounter difficulty establishing banking relationships. Our inability to maintain our current bank accounts would make it difficult for us to operate our business, increase our operating costs, and federal banking regulators will not create issues on banks handling funds generated from an activity that is illegal under federal law. The inability of potential clientspose additional operational, logistical and security challenges and could result in our target marketinability to open accountsimplement our business plan. Similarly, many of our customers are directly involved in cannabis sales and otherwise use the service of banksfurther restriction to their ability to access banking services may make it difficult for them to purchase our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and services.results of operations.

We are subject to certain federal regulations relating to cash reporting.

The Bank Secrecy Act, enforced by FinCEN, requires us to report currency transactions in excess of $10,000, including identification of the customer by name and social security number, to the IRS. This regulation also requires us to report certain suspicious activity, including any transaction that exceeds $5,000 that we know, suspect or have reason to believe involves funds from illegal activity or is designed to evade federal regulations or reporting requirements and to verify sources of funds. Substantial penalties can be imposed against us if we fail to comply with this regulation. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, the imposition of a substantial penalty could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Due to our involvement in the regulated medical and/or recreational-use cannabis industry, we may have a difficult time obtaining the various insurance policiesinsurances that are desired to operate our business, which may expose us to additional risksrisk and financial liabilities.liability

 

Insurance that is otherwise readily available, such as workers' compensation, general liability, and directors'directors and officers'officer’s insurance, is more difficult for us to find, and more expensive, because we supply products and technologies that supportare service providers to companies in the legal cultivation and processing of cannabis products.industry. There are no guarantees that we will be able to find such insuranceinsurances in the future, or that the cost will be affordable to us. If we are forced to go without such insurance,insurances, it may prevent us from entering into certain business sectors, may inhibit our growth, and may expose us to additional risk and financial liabilities.

 

RISK ASSOCIATED WITH OUR INDUSTRY

Our business and financial performance may be adversely affected by downturns in the target markets that we serve or reduced demand for the types of products we sell. 

Demand for our products is often affected by general economic conditions as well as product-use trends in our target markets. These changes may result in decreased demand for our products. The occurrence of these conditions is beyond our ability to control and, when they occur, they may have a significant impact on our sales and results of operations. The inability or unwillingness of our customers to pay a premium for our products due to general economic conditions or a downturn in the economy may have a significant adverse impact on our sales and results of operations.

 -12-

Table of Contents

Changes within the cannabis industry may adversely affect our financial performance. 

Changes in the identity, ownership structure and strategic goals of our competitors and the emergence of new competitors in our target markets may harm our financial performance. New competitors may include foreign-based companies and commodity-based domestic producers who could enter our specialty markets if they are unable to compete in their traditional markets. The paper industry has also experienced consolidation of producers and distribution channels. Further consolidation could unite other producers with distribution channels through which we intend to sell our products, thereby limiting access to our target markets.

We are subject to certain tax risks and treatments that could negatively impact our results of operations.

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, prohibits businesses from deducting certain expenses associated with trafficking-controlled substances (within the meaning of Schedule I and II of the Controlled Substances Act). The IRS has invoked Section 280E in tax audits against various cannabis businesses in the U.S. that are permitted under applicable state laws. Although the IRS issued a clarification allowing the deduction of certain expenses, the scope of such items is interpreted very narrowly, and the bulk of operating costs and general administrative costs are not permitted to be deducted. While there are currently several pending cases before various administrative and federal courts challenging these restrictions, there is no guarantee that these courts will issue an interpretation of Section 280E favorable to cannabis businesses.

The Company’s industry is highly competitive, and we have less capital and resources than many of our competitors which may give them and advantage in developing and marketing products similar to ours or make our products obsolete.

We are involved in a highly competitive industry where we may compete with numerous other companies who offer alternative methods or approaches, who may have far greater resources, more experience, and personnel perhaps more qualified than we do. Such resources may give our competitors an advantage in developing and marketing products similar to ours or products that make our products less desirable to consumers or obsolete. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully compete against these other entities.

We may be unable to respond to the rapid technological change in the industry and such change may increase costs and competition that may adversely affect our business

Rapidly changing technologies, frequent new product and service introductions and evolving industry standards characterize our market. The continued growth of the Internet and intense competition in our industry exacerbates these market characteristics. Our future success will depend on our ability to adapt to rapidly changing technologies by continually improving the performance features and reliability of our products. We may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction or marketing of our products. In addition, any new enhancements must meet the requirements of our current and prospective customers and must achieve significant market acceptance. We could also incur substantial costs if we need to modify our products and services or infrastructures to adapt to these changes.

We also expect that new competitors may introduce products or services that are directly or indirectly competitive with us. These competitors may succeed in developing, products and services that have greater functionality or are less costly than our products and services and may be more successful in marketing such products and services. Technological changes have lowered the cost of operating communications and computer systems and purchasing software. These changes reduce our cost of selling products and providing services, but also facilitate increased competition by reducing competitors’ costs in providing similar products and services. This competition could increase price competition and reduce anticipated profit margins.

 -13-

Table of Contents

RISKS RELATED TO OWNERSHIP OF OUR CAPITALCOMMON STOCK

We may need additional capital that will dilute the ownership interest of investors.

We may require additional capital to fund our future business operations. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-related or convertible debt securities, these securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the rights of holders of our shares of common stock, who may experience dilution of their ownership interest of our shares of Common Stock. We cannot predict whether additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms when required, or at all. Since our inception, we have experienced negative cash flow from operations and expect to experience significant negative cash flow from operations in the future. The issuance of additional shares of Common Stock by our board of directors may have the effect of further diluting the proportionate equity interest and voting power of holders of our shares of Common Stock.

We have the ability to issue additional shares of our shares of preferred stock without asking for stockholder approval, which could cause your investment to be diluted.

Our Articles of Incorporation authorizes the Board of Directors to issue up to 1,990,000,000 shares of Common Stock. The power of the Board of Directors to issue shares of Common Stock, preferred stock or warrants or options to purchase shares of Common Stock or preferred stock is generally not subject to stockholder approval. Accordingly, any additional issuance of our shares of Common Stock, or shares of preferred stock that may be convertible into Common Stock, may have the effect of diluting your investment.

Our shares of Common Stock qualify as a penny stock. As such, we are subject to the risks associated with “penny stocks”. Regulations relating to “penny stocks” limit the ability of our shareholders to sell their shares and, as a result, our shareholders may have to hold their shares indefinitely.

Our shares of Common Stock are deemed to be “penny stock” as that term is defined in Rule_3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Penny stocks are stocks: (a) with a price of less than $5.00 per share; (b) that are not traded on a “recognized” national exchange; (c) whose prices are not quoted on the NASDAQ automated quotation system (NASDAQ - where listed stocks must still meet requirement (a) above); or (d) in issuers with net tangible assets of less than $2,000,000 (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for at least three years) or $5,000,000 (if in continuous operation for less than three years), or with average revenues of less than $6,000,000 for the last three years.

Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act and Rule 240.15g(c)2 promulgated under the Exchange Act require broker dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Potential investors in our shares of Common Stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any shares of Common Stock that are deemed to be “penny stock”.

 -14-

Table of Contents

Moreover, Regulation 240.15g-9 of the SEC requires broker dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker dealer to: (a) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (b) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (c) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (d) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult for investors in our shares of Common Stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them. Holders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, dated April 17, 1991, the market for penny stocks suffers from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:

·control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;
·manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;
·boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced salespersons;
·excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and mark-ups by selling broker-dealers; and
·the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses.

Our Management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, Management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock and to deposit certificates in paper form or to clear shares for trading under Safe Harbor exemptions and regulations for unregistered shares.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (known as “FINRA”) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker- dealers to recommend that their customers buy our shares of Common Stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for our investor to deposit paper stock certificates or to clear our shares of Common Stock that are transferred electronically to brokerage accounts. There can be no assurances that our investors will be able to clear our shares for eventual resale.

Costs and expenses of being a reporting company under the Exchange Act may be burdensome and prevent us from achieving profitability

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and parts of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, and place significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

 -15-

Table of Contents

The trading market for our common stock is limited.

 

We are quoted on the OTC Markets Group’s OTCQB Over-the-Counter Bulletin Boardmarket tier under the trading symbol “SGMD”. The OTCQB is regarded as a junior trading venue. This may result in limited shareholder interest and hence lower prices for our common stock than might otherwise be obtained.

 

Our principal stockholders, executive officers and directors own a significant percentage of our common stock and will be able to exert a significant control over matters submitted to the stockholders for approval.

 

Our officers and directors, and stockholders who own more than 5% of our common stock beneficially own a significant percentage of our common stock. This significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price for our common stock because investors often perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies with controlling stockholders. These stockholders, if they acted together, could significantly influence all matters requiring approval by the stockholders, including the election of directors. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with the interests of other stockholders.

 

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividend on our common stock and do not currently intend to do so for the foreseeable future. We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. Therefore, the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which our stockholders have purchased their shares.

 

 -11-

Table of Contents

If we fail to establish or maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, and investor confidence and the market price of our common stock may, therefore, be adversely impacted.

 

As a public company, we are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting for each of our fiscal years and to report any material weaknesses in such internal control. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) requires that we evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, provide a management report on the internal control over financial reporting, which must be attested to by our independent registered public accounting firm to the extent we decide not to avail ourselves of the exemptions provided under federal laws. Management has presently concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective and has reported such conclusions in management’s report in this annual report on Form 10-K. In the event that the Company’s status with the SEC changes to that of an accelerated filer from a smaller reporting company, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to attest to and report on our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Under such circumstances, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting are effective, our independent registered public accounting firm may still decline to attest to our management’s assessment, or may issue a report that is qualified, if it is not satisfied with our controls, or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us.

 

Shareholders and investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected, we could become subject to investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources and could damage our reputation and diminish the value of our brand name.

 

 -16-

Table of Contents

The market price of our common stock may be volatile and may be affected by market conditions beyond our control. The market price of our common stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to, among other factors:

 

variations in our operating results and market conditions specific to our business;
the emergence of new competitors or new technologies;
operating and market price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable;
changes in our Board or management;
sales or purchases of our common stock by insiders;
commencement of, or involvement in, litigation;
changes in governmental regulations, in particular with respect to the cannabis industry; and
general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets.

variations in our operating results and market conditions specific to our business;
the emergence of new competitors or new technologies;
operating and market price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable;
changes in our Board or management;
sales or purchases of our common stock by insiders;
commencement of, or involvement in, litigation;
changes in governmental regulations, in particular with respect to the cannabis industry; and
general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets.

In addition, if the market for stocks in our industry, or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the market price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition, or results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause the price of our common stock to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to our Board of Directors and management.

 

 -12-

Table of Contents

The application of the “penny stock” rules could adversely affect the market price of our common shares and increase your transaction costs to sell those shares.

 

Our shares of Common Stock are considered to be “penny stocks” as the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC has adopted Rule 3a51-1, which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” to include any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share and because they are not registered on a national securities exchange or listed on an automated quotation system sponsored by a registered national securities association, pursuant to Rule 3a51-1(a) under the Exchange Act. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks and that the broker or dealer receives from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased. The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC relating to the penny stock market, which sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination and that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

 -17-

Table of Contents

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

 

Item 2. Properties

 

On February 23, 2018 the Company entered into lease agreement for a new office space as part of the plan to expand operation, the lease is set to commence Commencing March 1, 2018. The principal executive officesterm of the lease is for a (5) Five Years with 1 month free on the 1st year of the term. The monthly rent on the 1st year will be $11,770 with a 3% increase for each subsequent year. Total commitment for the full term of the lease will be $737,367. As of the date of this filing, this property became the headquarter of the company.

Our warehouse along with some office space is located at 20529 East Walnut Drive North, Diamond Bar, California, where we lease approximately 11,627 square feet of combined space. The lease term is for five years and two months ending on April 30, 2025. The current monthly rental payment for the facility is $13,022.

On September 28, 2020, the Company and LMK Capital LLC (“LMK”) entered into a Residential Lease (the “Lease”) pursuant to which LMK agreed to lease to the Company five acres located in Northern California and owned by LMK (the “Property”). Jimmy Chan, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and majority stockholder of the Company, are locatedis majority owner of LMK.

The term of the Lease begins on October 1, 2020 and ends on September 30, 2023; provided, however, that at the end of the term, the Lease will continue on a month-to-month basis. in Monrovia, California,the Pursuant to the terms of the Lease, the Company will pay rent in the amount of $20,000 per month. The Lease also provides that the Company will pay a $250,000 security deposit to LMK. Pursuant to the terms of the Lease, the monthly rent will increase to $0.50 per sq. ft. on cultivation area upon approval of certificate of occupancy with a 3% increase each subsequent year.

The Company intends to operate a regulated and are leased bylicensed cannabis cultivation business on the Company. The current lease expires on February 28, 2023.Property. 

 

We believe that our existing facilities are adequate for our present purposes. The Company leases all its facilities and believes that if necessary, it could secure suitable alternative facilities on similar terms without adversely affecting operations.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time and in the course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief. The amount of the ultimate liability, if any, from such claims cannot be determined. As of the date of this filing, there were no legal claims currently pending or, to our knowledge, threatened against our Company that, in the opinion of our management, would be likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, except as follows:

 

The Company has filed a lawsuit in Contra Costa County, California, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy to commit breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, conversion, breach of contract, and interference with contractual relations against, Diversified Products Group Inc. (DPG), Stephen Pinto, Lewis Cohen and Heidi Estiva, who were former sales agents for the Company. Stephen Pinto is the Company's former Chairman. The defendants have filed a counterclaim alleging that they were induced to make a series of investments in the Company by material misrepresentations and/or omissions made by the Company. The parties have attended mediation on the matters on September 7, 2018 and executed a stipulation for settlement agreement. However, the final settlement agreement is currently pending.

 

Outstanding Litigation On December 11, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint from two Convertible Note Holdersconvertible note holders and investors in the Company, Lovitt & Hannan, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan FBO J. Thomas Hannan, Attorney at Law 401K Plan and Trust, and Kevin M. Kearney. The Company's former CEO, Scott Lantz, was also named in the suit.Company. On February 21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs.plaintiffs in the matter of Hannan vs. Sugarmade. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Companycompany agreed to pay the plaintiffs $227,000 to settle all claims against the Company, which included the payoff of the two notes outstanding within one (1) week. Upon receipt of all payments, plaintiffs will surrender for cancellation 230,000outstanding. The parties had estimated the value of the Company's shares within ten (10) days. The parties agreed that all claims against the Company would be satisfied through such payments and that the matter would be fully resolved.notes at approximately $80,000. As of June 30, 2018, third-parties2020, third parties had purchased two (2) notes of approximately $80,000, reducing the Company's exposure by $80,000. As of the date of this filing, there remains a balance, plus accrued interest on the balance$227,000 and on the $80,000 due under the notes. 
On August 13, 2019, a lawsuit was filed against the Company for accruedunpaid legal settlement for Hannan vs Sugarmade has been reduced to $227,000, plus interest untilfees of $50,000 which originated from the dateCompany’s former chairman and CEO. The Company was served in or around September 2019. The Company entered into a sentiment and owes a remaining total of complete payoff.$30,000, payable at the rate of $10,000 per month under this agreement. 

 

There can be no assurances the ultimate liability relative to these law suitslawsuits will not exceed what is outlined above.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not Applicable.

 

 -13--18-

 Table of Contents

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Common Stock

 

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 1,990,000,00010,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of November 23, 2018,October 11, 2020, there were 299,897,5792,847,120,836 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, which were held by 8,304254 holders of record and which 230 are active.record. The number of holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of broker-dealers and registered clearing agencies.

 

Preferred Stock

 

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had 2,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding.

On October 8, 2019, the Company filed a certificate of designation of Series B Senior Preferred Stock. The Company has not yetnumber of shares initially constituting the Series B Senior Preferred Stock shall be Five Million (5,000,000). Each share of Series B Senior Preferred Stock shall be convertible into One Thousand (1,000) shares of Common Stock.

As of October 11, 2020, 2,541,500 shares of Series B senior preferred stock were issued any of its preferred stock.and outstanding.

 

Options and Warrants

 

On May 12, 2017, the Company entered into two warrant agreements with an investor. The investor shall receive a warrant exercisable into common stock equal to $51,000 and $24,750 divided by the exercise price (asNone of the issue date), such number may be adjusted from time to time pursuant to the terms and conditions of the warrant agreement. As of June 30th, 2018, the warrant liability exposure is $40,400.

Dividend Policy

The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not intend to declare or pay any cash dividend in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends, if any, is within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the Company’s earnings, if any, its capital requirements and financial condition and such other factors as the Board of Directors may consider.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The Company does not have any equity compensation plans or any individual compensation arrangements with respect to its common stock or preferred stock. The issuance of anyshares of our common stock are subject to outstanding options or preferred stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, which has the power to issue any or all of our authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval.warrants.

  

 -19-

Table of Contents

Market for Our Shares of Common Stock

 

Our common stock currently is traded on the OTCQB under the symbol “SGMD.” The market for our common stock is highly volatile. We cannot assure you that there will be a market in the future for our common stock. OTCQB securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTCQB securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers in stocks. OTCQB stocks are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a regional or national stock exchange.

   

 -14-

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of our common stock by both the OTC Bulletin Board and OTC Markets for the periods indicated. The following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions

 

For the year ended June 30, 2017HighLow
For the year ended June 30, 2019 High Low
Fourth Quarter$0.10$0.05 $0.06  $0.03 
Third Quarter$0.16$0.05 $0.10 $0.04 
Second Quarter$0.31$0.05 $0.15 $0.09 
First Quarter$0.13$0.02 $0.18 $0.09 

 

For the year ended June 30, 2018

HighLow
For the year ended June 30, 2020 High Low
Fourth Quarter$0.23$0.12 $0.007  $0.002 
Third Quarter$0.41$0.12 $0.013 $0.004 
Second Quarter$0.29$0.03 $0.022 $0.012 
First Quarter$0.05$0.02 $0.034 $0.011 

 

AsOctober 12, 2020, the closing price of our common stock on the previous trading close of the date of this filing, November 12th, 2018, the shares traded at $0.102OTCQB was $0.0016, with a total of 835,15918,341,100 shares traded.

 

Transfer Agent

 

Our transfer agent is West Coast Stock Transfer, Inc. of Encinitas, California; Telephone (619) 664-4780.

 

Dividends

Dividends

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. For the foreseeable future, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

 

 -20-

Table of Contents

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

Convertible Notes

On July 3, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 40% discount of average three lowest closing bid for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully repaid by cash.

On July 30, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $162,000 (includes $7,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 40% discount of the lowest closing bid for the 20 2018, Plaintiff Michael Franges filed suitconsecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

On August 14, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for breacha total amount of $153,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 10%. The conversion price for the note is 65% of the average of lowest two closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

On August 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $275,000 (includes $37,500 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

On August 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $275,000 (includes $25,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

On September 23, 2019, the Company entered a warrant settlement agreement againstto exchange convertible promissory note for a total amount of $200,000. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 10%. The conversion price for the note is 55% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully settled by $127,321 of cash and 18,181,818 shares of common stock.

On September 27, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $165,000 (includes $16,250 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

On September 27, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $165,000 (includes $16,250 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 55% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the note holder converted $50,000 principal with $2,992 interest expense into 56,007,062 shares of the Company’s previous predecessors (management and/or officers) for $50,000.00. common stock. As of June 30, 2020, the remaining note balance was $115,000.

On October 9, 2018,28, 2019, the parties settled the matter in exchangeCompany entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a dismissaltotal amount of $225,500 (includes $23,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the entire action,lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

 -21-

Table of Contents

 On October 28, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $225,500 (includes $23,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On November 14, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the average three lowest closing bid for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

On November 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,150 (includes $11,150 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On November 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,150 (includes $11,150 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On December 10, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,700 (includes $11,700 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On December 10, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,700 (includes $11,700 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On December 27, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $112,200 (includes $12,200 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On October 31, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $139,301. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008 per share.

On November 1, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008 per share.

On January 3, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $112,200 (includes $12,200 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On January 14, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $150,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On January 22, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $128,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 10%. The conversion price for the note is 35% discount to average of two lowest closing prices for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

 -22-

Table of Contents

On February 4, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $110,000 (includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is $0.001 per share.

On February 18, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000 (includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is $0.001 per share.

On March 5, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On April 24, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $75,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On June 10, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $36,300 (includes $3,300 OID and $3,000 Legal expense). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

On June 18, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $36,300 (includes $3,300 OID and $3,000 Legal expense). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

 -23-

Table of Contents

Shares of Common Stock

Subsequent to June 30, 2020, the Company issued 138,461,538 shares of common stock for cash in whichtotal amount of $690,287.

Except as otherwise noted, the Company’s current management and/or officers agreed to issuesecurities in these transactions were sold in reliance on the exemption from registration provided in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for transactions not involving any public offering. Each of the persons acquiring the foregoing securities was an accredited investor (as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D) and confirmed the foregoing and acknowledged, in writing, that the securities must be acquired and held for investment. All certificates evidencing the shares to plaintiff, Michael Franges in lieu of cash.sold bore a restrictive legend. The Company issued 500,000 shares attook reasonable steps to verify that the share priceinvestors were accredited investors. No underwriter participated in the offer and sale of $0.10.these securities, and no commission or other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly in connection therewith.

The proceeds from these sales were used for general corporate purposes.

 

Purchase of Equity Securities

 

The Company did not purchase or redeem any of its equity securities during the fourth quarter of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.2020.

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

 

Not applicable.

 

 -15--24-

 Table of Contents

Item 7. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

This discussion and analysis may include statements regarding our expectations with respect to our future performance, liquidity, and capital resources. Such statements, along with any other non-historical statements in the discussion, are forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, factors listed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC'').SEC. We do not assume an obligation to update any forward- looking statement. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any of the forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K. See "SPECIAL“SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS"STATEMENTS” above.

  

Overview and Financial Condition

Discussions with respect to our Company's operations included herein refer to our previous operating subsidiary, Sugarmade, Inc., a California corporation ("Sugarmade-CA''). Our Company purchased Sugarmade-CA, which was in the business to import, sell and distribute sustainable and environmentally friendly non-tree-based paper products. On May 9, 2011, our Company formerly known as Simple Earth, Inc. acquired all of the common stock of Sugarmade-CA. As of the date of this filing, we have discontinued the operations of Sugarmade-CA. Information with respect to our Company's nominal operations prior to the Sugarmade Acquisition is not included herein.

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth the results of our operations for the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017.2019. Certain columns may not add due to rounding.

 

  For the years ended June 30
  2018 2017
Revenues, net  4,439,324   4,100,560 
Cost of goods sold:  3,226,365   2,832,798 
Gross margin  1,212,959   1,267,762 
Operating Expense  2,454,906   3,986,314 
         
Loss from operations  (1,241,947)  (2,718,552)
Non-operating income (expense):  (5,054,480)  (1,995,145)
Net Income (Loss)  (6,296,426)  (4,713,697)

  For the years ended June 30
  2020 2019
Revenues, net  4,362,585   4,637,644 
Cost of goods sold:  2,851,940   3,368,659 
Gross margin  1,510,645   1,268,985 
Operating Expense  13,636,211   6,184,062 
Loss from operations  (12,118,367)  (4,915,077)
Non-operating income (expense):  (9,408,994)  (7,314,073)
Net Income (Loss)  (21,534,562)  (12,229,151)
Less: net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest  (195,416)  —   
Net Loss attributable to SugarMade Inc.  (21,339,146)  (12,229,151)

  

Revenues

 

For the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, revenues were $4,439,324$4,362,585 and $4,100,560$4,637,644 respectively. The increasedecrease was primarily due to COVID 19 crisis which had significant impact on the marketing agreement that was executed in December 2017 to expand into the hydroponicsrestaurant supply industry.

 

Cost of goods sold

 

For the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, cost of goods sold were $3,226,365$2,851,940 and $2,832,798$3,368,659 respectively. The increasedecrease was primarily due to COVID 19 crisis which had significant impact on the marketing agreement that was executed in December 2017 to expand into the hydroponicsrestaurant supply industry.

 

 -16-

Gross Profit

 

For the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, gross profit was $1,212,959$1,510,645 and $1,267,762,$1,268,985, respectively. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to the decrease of revenue.higher margin from Indigo dye business. The gross profit margin was 27.4%34.63% and 30.9%27.36%, respectively, for the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017.2019.

 

Selling, general and administrative, expenses

 

For the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, selling, general and administrative expenses were $2,454,906$13,636,211 and $3,986,314$6,184,062 respectively. The decrease wereincrease was attributable to lowerissuing of the common stock compensation expenseexpenses for employees, legal, and consulting expense for the year ended June 30, 2018.

fees.

 

 -25-

Non-operating income expenses

 

The Company had total non-operating expense of $5,054,480$9,408,994 and $1,995,145$7,314,073 for the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. The increase in non-operating income is primarily duerelated to increased interest expensethe accounting for the year ended June 30, 2018 compared with the year ended June 30, 2017.derivative liabilities.

 

Net loss

 

Net loss totaled $6,296,426$21,534,562 for the year ended June 30, 2018,2020, compared to a net loss of $4,713,697$12,229,151 for the year ended June 30, 2017.2019. The increase in net loss was primarily a resultattributable to issuing all of increased interest expensethe stock compensation expenses for employees, legal, and realized loss on notes converted.consulting fees.

 

Outstanding Litigation

 

As of the date of this filing, theThe Company is a plaintiff, in Contra Costa County, California, in a suit alleging breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy to commit breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, conversion, breach of contract, and interference with contractual relations against Diversified Products Group Inc. (DPG), Stephen Pinto, Lewis Cohenincluding its former employees and Heidi Estiva, who were former sales agents for the Company. Pinto is the Company's former Chairman of the board of directors. The Company plans to actively pursue this case. During November of 2014, the Company received notice that a cross complaint had been filed against the Company. The complaint allegesmatter has been settled and is pending dismissal of the parties were induced to make a series of investments in the Company by the material misrepresentations and omissions made by the Company. The parties have attended mediation on the matters on September 7, 2018, and executed a stipulation for a settlement agreement. However, the final settlement agreement is currently pending.entire action.

 

Outstanding Litigation On December 11, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint from two Convertible Note Holdersconvertible note holders and investors in the Company, Lovitt & Hannan, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan FBO J. Thomas Hannan, Attorney at Law 401K Plan and Trust, and Kevin M. Kearney. The Company's former CEO, Scott Lantz, was also named in the suit.

 -17-

Company. On February 21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffplaintiffs in the matter of Hannan vsvs. Sugarmade. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Companycompany agreed to pay the plaintiffs'plaintiffs $227,000 to settle all claims against the Company, which included the payoff of the two notes outstanding within one (1) week.outstanding. The parties had estimated the value of the notes at approximately $80,000. The Company agreed to pay the plaintiff $97,000 within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the settlement with the remaining balance of $50,000 due within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the settlement. Upon receipt of all payments, plaintiffs will surrender for cancellation 230,000 of the Company's shares within ten (10) days. The parties agreed that all claims against the Company would be satisfied through such payments and that the matter would be fully resolved. As of June 30, 2018, third-parties2020, third parties had purchased two (2) notes of approximately $80,000, reducing the Company's exposure by $80,000.Asof the date of this filing, there remains a balance, plus accrued interest on the balance$227,000 and on the $80,000 due under the notes. 

On August 13, 2019, a lawsuit was filed against the Company for accruedunpaid legal settlement for Hannan vs Sugarmade has been reduced to $227,000.fees of $50,000 which originated from the Company’s former chairman and CEO. The Company was served in or around September 2019. The Company entered into a sentiment and owes a remaining total of $30,000, payable at the rate of $10,000 per month under this agreement.  

 

There can be no assurances the ultimate liability relative to these law suitslawsuits will not exceed what is outlined above.

 

Related Party Transactions

From time to time, SWC would receive short-term loans from LMK. Capital, LLC ("LMK.") for its working capital needs. As of June 30, 2018, the Company's outstanding balance to LMK is zero.

On December l, 2016, SGMD received a loan from an employee for $12,500 with an interest charge of $12,500. This amount was recorded as interest owed to the loan payable amount and is to be amortized on a monthly basis over the life of the loan. The loan was due on December 1, 2017. As of June 30, 2018, the balance is zero.

 

On July 7, 2016, SWC received a loan from the same employee indicated above for $15,000 and during the fiscal year the total advance to the company was $29,255.87.$29,256. The amount of the loan bears no interest. As of June 30, 2018,2020, the balance of the loan is $30,000.zero.

 

On November 21, 2016, SGMDJanuary 23, 2013, SWC received a loan from the Company's directoran employee for $1,260 and during the fiscal year the highest balance owed was $79,092.$40,000. The amount of the loan bears no interest. As of June 30, 2018,2020, the balance of the loan from Sugarmade is zero.

On September 7, 2016, our CEO and Chairman, Jimmy Chan, was awarded five (5) million shares of restricted common stock in the Company in lieu of salary, equivalent to $150,000.

On September 7, 2016, Director Waylon Huang, was awarded three (3) million shares of restricted common stock in the Company in lieu of salary, equivalent to $90,000. Mr. Huang is also the general manager of the CarryOutSupplies.com.

On September 7, 2016, Richard Ko, was awarded three (3) million shares of restricted common stock in the Company in lieu of salary, equivalent to $90,000 annually for services provided to the Company.

On June 26, 2017, SGMD entered a straight promissory note with a company (whose major shareholder is the former director of the Company) for borrowing $180,820 with maturity date on December 31, 2017; the note bears an interest rate of 12%, commencing on October 31, 2017, and on the last day of each moth thereafter until the notes is paid in full, the Company shall make an interest payment As of June 30, 2018, the outstanding balance under this note was $180,820 to loan payable.$15,427.

  

Leverage Ratio

 

Due to net losses from the previous years, the Company'sCompany’s insolvency is a result of their stockholder'sstockholder’s deficiency. Total liabilities amounted to $12,371,510 where$12,645,933 and the company experienced a stockholder'scompany’s stockholders’ deficiency total of a negative $10,183,546was $9,138,873, resulting in a Debt to Equity ratio of -1.21:-1.38:1.

 

 -18--26-

Going Concern

 

The Company sustained continued operating losses during the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017.2019. The Company'sCompany’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations, in which it has not been successful, and/or obtaining additional financing from its shareholders or other sources, as may be required.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern; however, the above condition raises substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to do so. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Management is endeavoring to increase revenue-generating operations. While priority is on generating cash from operations through the sale of the Company'sCompany’s products, management is also seeking to raise additional working capital through various financing sources, including the sale of the Company'sCompany’s equity and/or debt securities, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue our business as desired and our operating results will be adversely affected. In addition, any financing arrangement may have potentially adverse effects on us and/or our stockholders. Debt financing (if available and undertaken) will increase expenses, must be repaid regardless of operating results and may involve restrictions limiting our operating flexibility. If we issue equity securities to raise additional funds, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current holders of our common stock.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We have primarily financed our operations through the sale of unregistered equity, loans and convertible notes payable. As of June 30, 2018,2020, our Company had a cash balance of $42,121,$441,004, current assets of $1,941,432$1,912,659 and total assets of $2,187,963.$3,507,062. We had current liability of $12,371,510$11,680,259 and total liabilities of $12,371,510. Stockholders' equity$12,645,933. Stockholders’ deficit reflected a deficit of $10,183,546.$9,138,873.

 

The following is a summary of cash provided by or used in each of the indicated types of activities during the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017:2019:

 

Cash (used in) provided by: 2018 2017 2020 2019
Operating activities $(2,894,210) $(1,918,210) $(1,984,876) $(2,323,231)
Investing activities  (178,421)  (24,052)  (132,494)  (351,395)
Financing activities  3,012,872   2,043,231   2,524,003   2,666,876 

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $2,894,210$1,984,876 for the year ended June 30, 2018,2020, and $1,918,210$2,204,940 for the year ended June 30, 2017.2019. The increasedecrease was attributable to the increased net loss, increased cash outflow on inventory,stock compensations, and decreased cash inflow on unearned revenue and other payables.change in fair value of derivative liability.

 

 -19-

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended June 30, 20182020 and 2019 was $178,421,$132,494 and $351,395, which was for the purchase of fixed assets; while cash used in investing activities for the year ended June 30, 2017 was $24,052, mainly from the payment for the loan receivables.assets.

 

 -27-

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $3,012,872$2,524,003 for the year ended June 30, 2018.2020. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $2,043,231$2,666,876 for the year ended June 30, 2017.2019. The increasedecrease in cash inflow in 20182020 was mainly due to increaseddecreased proceeds from convertible notes and loans.selling of common shares.

 

Our capital requirements going forward will consist of financing our operations until we are able to reach a level of revenues and gross margins adequate to equal or exceed our ongoing operating expenses. Other than the notes payable discussed above, borrowings from our bank and the production credit facility with our suppliers, we do not have any credit agreements or other sources of liquidity immediately available to us.

 

Given estimates of our Company'sCompany’s future operating results and our credit arrangements with our suppliers, we are currently forecasting that we will need to secure additional financing to obtain adequate financial resources to reach profitability.Asof the date of this report, we estimate that the cash necessary to implement our current business plan for the next twelve (12) months is approximately $4,000,000.$5,000,000.

 

Based on our need to raise additional funds to implement our business plans for the next twelve months, we have included a discussion concerning the presentation of our financial statements on a going concern basis in the notes to our financial statements and our independent public accountants have included a similar discussion in their opinion on our financial statements through June 30, 2018.2019. We will be required in the near future to issue debt or sell our Company'sCompany’s equity securities in order to raise additional cash, although there are no firm arrangements in place for any such financing at this time. We cannot provide any assurances as to whether we will be able to secure the necessary financing, or the terms of any such financing transaction if one were to occur. The failure to secure such financing could severely curtail our plans for future growth or in more severe scenarios, the continued operations of our Company.

 

Capital Expenditures

 

Our current plans do call for our Company to expend significant amounts for capital expenditures for the foreseeable future beyond relatively insignificant expenditures for office furniture and information technology related equipment and employees as it is part of the requirement to build the infrastructure needed to support the current growth. At the same time, we will continually evaluating the production processes of our third (3rd) party contract manufacturers to determine if there are investments, we could make in their processes to achieve manufacturing improvements and significant cost savings. Any such desired investments would require additional cash above our current forecast requirements.

 

Critical Accounting Policies Involving Management Estimates and Assumptions

 

Use of Fair Value

 

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

 -20-

Level l - observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

Level 2 - include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

 

Level 3 - unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activities.

 

 -28-

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Background on FASB’s Development of New Revenue Recognition Standard

 

In May 2014, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASUAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date” (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers the effective date for ASU 2014-09 by one year. For public entities, the guidance in ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (including interim reporting periods within those periods), and for all other entities, ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue versus Net)” (“ASU 2016-08”), which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations in the new revenue recognition standard. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”), which reduces the complexity when applying the guidance for identifying performance obligations and improves the operability and understandability of the license implementation guidance. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU 2016-12”), which amends the guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes. In December 2016, the FASB further issued ASU 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2016-20”), which makes minor corrections or minor improvements to the Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. The amendments are intended to address implementation and provide additional practical expedients to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the new revenue standard. These amendments have the same effective date as the new revenue standard.

  

Business Overview

Sugarmade, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “we”, “us” or “the/our Company”) is a publicly traded company incorporated in the state of Delaware. Our previous legal name was Diversified Opportunities, Inc.  Our Company primarily operates through our subsidiary, Sugarmade, Inc., a California corporation (“SWC Group, Inc., - CA”). We are headquartered in Monrovia, California, a suburb of Los Angeles, with an additional warehouse location in Southern California. As of date of this filing, we employ 21 full and part-time workers and contractors.

 -21--29-

As of the end of the reporting period, March 31, 2018, we were involved in several businesses including, 1) the supply of products to the quick service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry, 2) as a distributor of paper products derived from non-wood sources and, 3) as a marketer of culinary seasoning products Seasoning Stix and Sriracha Seasoning Stix.Cash

As of the date of this filing, the Company are involved in several businesses including:

1)Supplying the hydroponic and indoor/outdoor cultivation agricultural market sectors, including the cannabis cultivation, processing and distribution sectors. While we supply products to these industries, none of our operations involve the cultivation, processing, distribution or the engagement in any business operations regarding the cultivation, processing or distribution of any cannabis product or any product containing cannabis. While our entrance into this business sector was announced during late November 2017, we did not begin to recognize revenues from this operation until later in calendar 2018.
2)The supply of genetic and custom printed products to the quick service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry and,
3)As a marketer and distributor of culinary seasoning products Seasoning Stix and Sriracha Seasoning Stix.

During the first calendar quarter of 2018, our management team and our board of directors determined the business operation of acting as a distributor of paper products derived from non-wood sources was no longer strategic to the Company and thus, this business operation was discontinued.

Our board of directors believes the Company has a significant market opportunity to act as a supplier to the legal cannabis cultivation, processing and distribution market sectors. We approach these markets as a supplier of products to legal market participants and do not engage in the business of cultivating, processing or distributing cannabis or any products that contain cannabis. While our primary focus has been on companies engaged in such business operations on the west coast of the United States, our business has significantly expanded as legal medical and recreational cannabis business activities have proliferated into many other states. While our business is rapidly expanding across most of the United States, California remains an important marketplace due both the sheer size of the State’s economy and due to the rapid embrace of legalization. We also believe the Company has strong revenue expansion opportunities within the retail hydroponic agricultural sector as these businesses are complementary to our current business. We are currently in process of analyzing several acquisitions for expansion in this area.

During 2017, Sugarmade announced the signing of an exclusive distribution agreement for California, Oregon and Washington with privately held Plantation Corp. for its breakthrough BudLife preservation technology based on integration of specialized gases and natural agents that dramatically extends the useful life of medical marijuana up to six (6) months by actively monitoring the internal containers environment and automatically adjusting its atmosphere as needed. Sugarmade has conducted initial product prototype testing of the BudLife product, realizing positive results. Sugarmade plans to move forward as Plantation’s distribution partner upon availability of the BudLife product line.

We plan to continue our business pursuits relative to our CarryOutSuppies.com business, which is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies servicing more than 2,000 quick service restaurants. Our products include double poly paper cups for cold beverage; disposable, clear, plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons and many other similar products for this market sector. CarryOutSupplies.com was founded in 2009. Carryoutsupplies management estimates it holds and approximately 25% to 40% market share of generic and printed products within the take out frozen yogurt and ice cream industries.

As of the end of the reporting period, March 31, 2018, we were also a distributor of paper made from 100% reclaimed sugarcane fiber, enhanced with bamboo. Sugarcane fiber, called bagasse, is a discarded byproduct of sugarcane production. As of the date of this filing, we have discontinued this business operation, as our board of directors determined superior revenue growth opportunities existed elsewhere within the marketplace.

 -22-

Sugarmade is also a distributor of culinary seasoning products Sriracha Stix and Seasoning Stix. During September of 2016, the Company completed negotiations for and signed an agreement with HUY FONG FOODS, INC. (“HFFI”), the maker of Sriracha Hot Chili Sauce, under which the Company became a party to a license with Huy Fong Foods, Inc. gaining permission from Huy Fong Foods, Inc. to use the licensed marks for the limited products and purposes permitted by the license. Based on this agreement and a separate marketing and sales agreement signed with Seasoning Stixs International, LLC, the Company markets a culinary seasoning product named Sriracha Seasoning Stixs. Sriracha Seasoning Stixs are encapsulated Huy Fong Sriracha Sauce and other seasonings in the form of a stick, which are inserted into meat, fish and poultry prior to cooking. All trademarks, service marks and intellectual property remain the property of the respective owners.

Sales Cycle

The sales transaction is initiated when Company receives a purchase orders from its customer either online or by emails. For special/customized order, a sales contract is entered between the Company and its customer to summarize the price, product spec, method of shipping, and other general terms. Company normally collects 50% of deposit from is customer in advance. Afterward, the Company would arrange a purchase with its vendors to fulfill the customer’s need.

For regular sales, general and key contract provisions include the following:

Delivery:

For the online orders, seller (the Company) is responsible to arrange a carrier (Fedex/UPS) to pick up the product at the warehouse and deliver to the customer. A Packing List and Delivery Note (Delivery confirmation) will be sent to the customer to summarize the quantity, weight, and specification of products.

For the store pickup, invoice will be signed by the Customer as a way to confirm the acceptance.

Transfer of ownership: Products need to be received and inspected by the customer.

Five Steps Analysis performed by the Company to determine whether there will be a material impact on the adoption of ASC 606


Step 1: Identify the contract

Currently, all sales transaction are outlined and initiated by an online purchase order or sales contract for special order. The purchase order and sales contract clearly defined the price, payment terms, and specs.

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations

Based on the nature of the business and the product, a sales transaction entered by the Company and its customer only has a single performance obligation, which is selling and arrange the delivery of products. No additional service nor continued involvement are provided.

Currently, the Company usually is paid after the customer placed their orders.

In addition, the Company requires 50% payments before process for the special purchase order. The special order usually take about two months to produce. This is treated as an advance from customers and is mainly the advancement for products purchased.

 -23-

The Company does not provide or sell any services.

Performance obligation is fulfilled when the Company completes the sale and transferred its ownership and risk based on the terms and conditions defied on the sales contract.

Step 3: Determine the transaction price

All purchase order have a fixed amount. No variable amounts are involved.

Step 4: Allocate the transaction price

There is no need to allocate the transaction price since the company only has one performance obligation as discussed above.

Step 5: Recognize revenue

Revenue is recognized when all steps are accomplished. No major difference with the current revenue recognition policy due to the nature of the business and products.

Conclusion: The Company assessed the potential impact of the adoption Topic 606 and will elect using the retrospective transition method. However, the Company does not expect that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements. The Company also believes that its current revenue recognition policies are generally consistent with the new revenue recognition standards set forth in ASU 2014-09.

Evaluation of the Transition Disclosures:

The company’s transition disclosures included:

“Preliminarily, we plan to adopt Topic 606 in the first quarter of our fiscal 2018 using the retrospective transition method, and are continuing to evaluate the impact our pending adoption of Topic 606 will have on our consolidated financial statements. The Company’s current revenue recognition policies are generally consistent with the new revenue recognition standards set forth in ASU 2014-09. Potential adjustments to input measures are not expected to be pervasive to the majority of the Company’s contracts. While no significant impact is expected upon adoption of the new guidance, the Company will not be able to make that determination until the time of adoption based upon outstanding contracts at that time.”

Based on the company’s revenue recognition process, the company’s transition disclosures appear appropriate given that adoption of FASB ASC 606 (1) does not appear to require significant changes required to the company’s processes and internal controls; (2) does not appear to require any additional performance obligations that require separation; and (3) does not appear to have a material difference in the company’s current revenue recognition. There is no effect on the financial statements for the current year except for the transition disclosures.

Cash

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of amounts held as bank deposits and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.

 

From time to time, we may maintain bank balances in interest bearing accounts in excess of the $250,000 currently insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for interest bearing accounts (there is currently no insurance limit for deposits in noninterest bearing accounts). We have not experienced any losses with respect to cash. Management believes our Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to its cash.

 

 -24-

Accounts receivable

 

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts, net of any estimated allowances for doubtful accounts. We grant unsecured credit to our customer’s deemed credit worthy. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed and potential credit losses estimated by management are charged to operations on a regular basis. At the time any particular account receivable is deemed uncollectible, the balance is charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company had accounts receivable net of allowances of $453,623$134,517 as of June 30, 20182020 and of $113,218$218,145 as of June 30, 2017.2019.

Inventory

 

Inventory consists of finished goods paper and paper-based products ready for sale and is stated at the lower of cost or market. We value inventories using the weighted average costing method (approximate FIFO costing method). We regularly review inventory and consider forecasts of future demand, market conditions and product obsolescence. If the estimated realizable value of our inventory is less than cost, we make provisions in order to reduce its carrying value to its estimated market value.

 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are computed principally using accelerated and straight-line methods using lives of 5 years for machine and equipment, 2-5 years for vehicles, 3-5 years for production, and 1.5-5 years for land improvements.

Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized while repairs and maintenance costs are normally charged to the statement of operations in the year in which they are incurred. In situations where it can be clearly demonstrated that the expenditure has resulted in an increase in the future economic benefits expected to be obtained from the use of the asset, the expenditure is capitalized as an additional cost of the asset.

Upon sale or disposal of an asset, the historical cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization of such asset were removed from their respective accounts and any gain or loss is recorded in the statements of income.

The Company reviews the carrying value of property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded in operating expenses during the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

Intangible assets, net

 

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful life. The Company monitors conditions related to these assets to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining amortization period. The Company tests its intangible assets with finite lives for potential impairment whenever management concludes events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The original estimate of an asset'sasset’s useful life and the impact of an event or circumstance on either an asset'sasset’s useful life or carrying value involve significant judgment.

 

Derivative Instruments

 

The fair value of derivative instruments is recorded and shown separately under current liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives liability are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations under non-operating income (expense).

 

 -30-

Our Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a Lattice Binomial model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. Refer to note 9 for details.

 

Stock Based Compensation

 

Stock based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and will be recognized as expense over the employee'semployee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). We estimate the fair value of employee stock options granted using the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing Model. Key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options will include the exercise price of the award, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, the expected option term, the risk-free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected volatility and the expected annual dividend yield on our common stock.

 

 -25-

Loss Per Share

 

We calculate basic earnings per share (“EPS”) by dividing our net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without considering common stock equivalents. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income or net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted average number of dilutive common stock equivalents, such as options and warrants. Options and warrants are only included in the calculation of diluted EPS when their effect is dilutive. As of June 30, 2018,2020, there are approximately 291,540,6711,974,584,090 potential shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debts and PPM, and 505,00010,578,880 shares of warrants were excluded in calculating diluted loss per share for the year ended June 30, 20182020 due to the fact that issuance of the shares is anti-dilutive as a result of the Company’s net loss.

 

Income taxes

 

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their perspective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are recorded, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

 

As a result of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax position, as defined, ASC 740 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspect of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. We adopted the provisions of ASC 740 as of October 2, 2008 and have analyzed filing positions in each of the federal and state jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have identified the U.S. federal and California as our “major” tax jurisdictions and generally, we remain subject to Internal Revenue Service examination of our 2013 U.S. federal income tax returns. However, we have certain tax attribute carryforwards, which will remain subject to review and adjustment by the relevant tax authorities until the statute of limitations closes with respect to the year in which such attributes are utilized.

 

We believe that our income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and do not anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material change to our financial position. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to ASC 740. In addition, we did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of ASC 740. Our policy for recording interest and penalties associated with income-based tax audits is to record such items as a component of income taxes. We have no interest or penalties as of June 30, 2018.2020.

 

 -31-

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on the consolidated financial statements.

 -26-

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue versus Net). In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of ASU 2014-09 and 2014-16, and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. These ASUs clarify the implementation guidance on a few narrow areas and adds some practical expedients to the guidance Topic 606. The Company is evaluating the effect that these ASUs will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company believes the implement of new standard will not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which includes amendments to accounting for income taxes at settlement, forfeitures, and net settlements to cover withholding taxes. The amendments in ASU 2016-09 are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2017 andadopt this standard does not have a material impact onwith an effective date of July 1, 2019 using the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 clarifies the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16—Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This ASU improves the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than invent tory. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Earlyprospective adoption is permitted.

 -27-

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim period within those fiscal years.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.approach.

  

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The guidance should be adopted on a prospective basis for the annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Business Strategy

Our business strategy isIn June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Stock-based Compensation: Improvements to useNonemployee Share-based Payment Accounting, which amends the powerexisting accounting standards for share-based payments to nonemployees. This ASU aligns much of the Internetguidance on measuring and e-commerce marketingclassifying nonemployee awards with that of awards to brand and market products in order to grow our Company and maximize value for our shareholders. Over many years, our management team has gained significant experienceemployees. Under the new guidance, the measurement of nonemployee equity awards is fixed on the grant date. This ASU becomes effective in the sourcingfirst quarter of fiscal year 2019 and manufacturingearly adoption is permitted but no earlier than an entity’s adoption date of products, particularly in Asia,ASC 606. Entities will apply the ASU by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the adoption date. The Company adopted this update on July 1, 2018 and the importation and distribution of such products. We plan to use this expertise in order to invest in products and brands with disruptive potential and we have molded our business operations toward this goal.

Below, we explain our business strategy for our major products and markets.

Hydroponic and Agricultural Supplies

Relative to hydroponic and agricultural supplies, we seek to leverage our extensive contract manufacturing, international importation expertise and geographic location within the Los Angeles area in order to increase our sales within this fast growing market sector. At this time, Sugarmade does not engage in any business operations involving the actual cultivation, processing or sale of any cannabis product. Instead, we seek to act as a supplier to industry participants of this growing and dynamic marketplace.

Our Board of Directors believes the legal cannabis-related supply sector could be highly lucrative for the Company, and thus we plan to pursue a strategy of expanding operations within this area. Accordingadoption had no material impact to the State of Legal Marijuana Markets Report (4th Edition), published by Arc View Market Research and produced by New Frontier, California is the largest medical marijuana program in the country among states where medical marijuana is currently legal. The California market is fueled by the state's large size, longevity as the first-in-the-nation medical marijuana program, and low barriers to patient access. Even with California's newly passed recreational marijuana law, which will significantly tighten the program with new restrictions; the market is still projected to reach $2.6 billion in sales in 2020. This amount is nearly double Colorado's $1.5 billion, and over five times the size of the markets in Arizona, Oregon, and Michigan for that year. If legalized in 2016, the medical marijuana markets in Ohio and Pennsylvania will become two of the largest in the country by 2020. According to the data, a handful of states in the western U.S. project to command over 50% of the medical marijuana market by 2020. As more and more states legalize both medical and recreational cannabis, we believe our company can benefit from our Internet and e-commerce marketing activities.

 -28-

During December of 2017, we entered into a master marketing agreement with BizRight, LLC, a leading marketer and manufacturer of cannabis and hydroponic growth supplies, which offers a range of hydroponics-related products including: HPS grow lights, electronic ballasts, HPS Bulbs, nutrient mixes, environmental control products, pH measurement and calibration solutions and other cannabis-related grow and storage products. BizRight operates the ZenHydro.com website and other e-commerce properties and sells various products to distributors and retailers. This relationship has allowed out Company to significantly expand our revenue growth prospects. We plan to continue to expand this business operation for the foreseeable future.

Early in 2017, Sugarmade signed a distribution agreement with privately-held, Plantation, Corp. becoming the exclusive distributor for the BudLife product line for what Sugarmade believes is the single largest cannabis market in the world - the U.S. states of California, Oregon, and Washington. With the legalization of recreational cannabis occurring recently in these states, the Company believes there is a significant market opportunity for this revolutionary and patented product line. The marketing of this product does not involve manufacturing, sales or marketing of any product containing cannabis or cannabis containing substances.

BudLife utilizes a radical integration of specialized gases and natural agents to create a preservation technology that dramatically extends the useful life of cannabis for up to six months by actively monitoring the internal container's environment and automatically adjusting its atmosphere as needed; all without the need for refrigeration. This is a critical capability in the case of marijuana, since unlike fruits and vegetables that thrive in these chilly conditions, refrigeration degrades and undermines the efficacy of the plant's medical benefits. The technology's innovative features preserve THC levels, retard terpene degradation and safeguard the other important properties of cannabis, while protecting it from infestation, mold and pathogens to ensure product safety. The BudLife product is currently under development and it is expected Plantation, Corp. will release the product to Sugarmade during 2018. Sugarmade plans to actively market this product line to distributors and retailers throughout the three-state territory as soon as products are made available to us and to our sales channels.

We also seek to grow our Company and our revenue bases via acquisitions. We recently issued two proposals summarizing the principal terms regarding the acquisition of all of the outstanding capital stock, assets and assumption of liabilities of two market participants within the hydroponic cultivation supply sector. Additionally, the Company has recently announced it is in talks with other potential acquisition targets. At this time, none of these transactions has been completed and there is no assurance that any such transactions will take place.

Quick Service Restaurant Supply

CarryOutSupplies.com remains a major business unit for the Company, but we expect other business initiatives to be the major growth drivers of the business during future periods. CarryOutSupplies.com, is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies and has served more than 2,000 quick service restaurants. Our products include double poly paper cups for cold beverage; disposable, clear, plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons and many other similar products for this market sector.

Over the past year, we have redirected out staff toward improving the online presence of this business operation. As a result of these efforts, our web presence has grown significantly with major improvements to our website traffic. We attribute these Internet gains to a complete redesign of our web presence and significantly expanded search engine optimization initiatives. These redesigns, and other programs implemented by management, have allowed us to maintain a relatively stable business operation for this unit even though competition has increased. Over the coming year, we will continue to expand our web presence while we introduce new products to the CarryOutSupplies portfolio.

 -29-

Recent Updates to our Business Strategy

During the first calendar quarter of 2018, our management team and our board of directors determined the business operation of acting as a distributor of paper products derived from non-wood sources was no longer strategic to the Company and thus, this business operation was discontinued.

As of the end of the second calendar quarter of 2018, our management team and our board of directors determined the business operation of acting as a marketer and distributor of culinary seasoning products Seasoning Stix and Sriracha Seasoning Stix was no longer strategic to the Company and thus this business operation was terminated in order to focus all corporate resources in hydroponic-related and quick services restaurant-related areas.Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2019, the future, we plan to continue to concentrate primarily onFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2019-12, “Simplifying the hydroponic and cultivation market place, in additionAccounting for Income Taxes”. The pronouncement simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the quick service restaurant supply sector. general principles in ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. The pronouncement also improves consistent application of and simplifies GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. ASU 2019-12 will be effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, with early adoption permitted. We are still evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

The FASB recently issued ASU 2020-06, Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470- 20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity, to reduce complexity in applying GAAP to certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. The guidance in ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock by removing the existing guidance in ASC 470-20, Debt: Debt with Conversion and Other Options, that requires entities to account for beneficial conversion features and cash conversion features in equity, separately from the host convertible debt or preferred stock. The guidance in ASC 470-20 applies to convertible instruments for which the embedded conversion features are not required to be bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for as derivatives.

In addition, wethe amendments revise the scope exception from derivative accounting in ASC 815-40 for freestanding financial instruments and embedded features that are currently analyzing expandingboth indexed to the issuer’s own stock and classified in stockholders’ equity, by removing certain criteria required for equity classification. These amendments are expected to result in more freestanding financial instruments qualifying for equity classification (and, therefore, not accounted for as derivatives), as well as fewer embedded features requiring separate accounting from the host contract.

The amendments in ASU 2020-06 further revise the guidance in ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, to require entities to calculate diluted earnings per share (EPS) for convertible instruments by using the if-converted method. In addition, entities must presume share settlement for purposes of calculating diluted EPS when an instrument may be settled in cash or shares. The amendments in ASU 2020-06 are effective for public entities that meet the definition of an SEC filer, excluding smaller reporting companies as defined by the SEC, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Entities should adopt the guidance as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption and cannot adopt the guidance in an interim reporting period. We are still evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our business operations into the hydroponic and cultivation retail sector via direct acquisitions of participants in that market sector. consolidated financial statements.

  

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.305(e)), the Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item as it is a "smaller“smaller reporting company," as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1).

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements at June 30, 20182020 and 20172019 nor at any time during the years then ended or through the dateended.

 -32-

 

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accountants3134
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 20182020 and 201720193335
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 201720193436
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' DeficiencyStockholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 201720193537
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 20182020 and 201720193638
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements3739

 

 -30--33-

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm(Predecessor Audit Firm)

19720 Jetton Road, 3rd Floor

Cornelius, NC 28031

Tel: 704-897-8336

Fax: 704-919-5089

 

To the shareholders and the board of directors of Sugarmade Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Sugarmade, Inc. (the "Company") as of June 30, 2017, the related statement of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Substantial Doubt about the Company's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.Asdiscussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company's significant operating losses raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ BF Borgers CPA PC

BF Borgers CPA PC

We have served as the Companys auditor since 2017 Lakewood, CO

March 19, 2018

 -31-

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Sugarmade, Inc. and Subsidiary

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sugarmade, Inc. and Subsidiary(“Subsidiary (“the Company”) as of June 30, 20182020 and 2019 and the related consolidated statementstatements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, cash flows and the related notes to consolidated financial statements (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”) consolidated financial statements)for the years ended June 30, 2018. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.2020 and 2019. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2018,2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

The Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit, recurring losses, and expects continuing future losses, and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s evaluation of the events and conditions and management’s plans regarding these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

  

/s/ L&L CPAS, PA

L&L CPAS, PA

Certified Public Accountants

Cornelius, NCPlantation, FL

The United States of America

November 28, 2018October 15, 2020

 

We have served as the Company's auditor since March 2018.

 

 -32--34-

Sugarmade, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

Assets As of June 30,
Current Assets: 2018 2017
     Cash $42,121  $101,880 
     Accounts Receivables, Net  453,623   113,218 
     Inventory, Net  531,249   568,229 
     Loan Receivable  157,872   10,000 
     Other Current Assets  756,565   190.338 
         
Total Current Assets  1,941,432   983,665 
         
     Equipment, Net  195,180   61,792 
     Intangible Assets  12,600   73,125 
     Other Assets  38,751   27,081 
         
Total Assets  2,187,963   1,145,663 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit        
Current Liabilities:        
     Note Payable Due to Bank  25,982   25,982 
     Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities  1,707,641   1,503,920 
     Accounts Payable – Related Party  —     23,086 
     Customer Deposits  329,509   232,591 
     Unearned Revenue  110,142   63,304 
     Other Payables  241,771   223,482 
     Accrued Interest ��493,365   116,236 
     Accrued Compensation and Personnel Related Payables  869,673   11,403 
     Note Payable  20,000   —   
     Note Payable – Related Parties  23,000   192,801 
     Loan Payable  329,029   228,412 
     Loan Payable – Related Parties  30,000   83,625 
     Convertible Note Payables, Net  2,399,941   1,502,023 
     Derivative Liabilities  3,069,652   1,134,000 
     Warrant Liabilities  40,400   25,250 
     Share to Be Issued  2,691,000   893,000 
         
Total Current Liabilities  12,381,106   6,246,156 
         
Total Liabilities  12,381,106   6,246,156 
         
Stockholders’ Deficit:        
Preferred Stock, $0.001 Par Value, 10,000,000 Shares Authorized, None Issued and Outstanding  —     —   
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value, 1,990,000,000 Shares Authorized, 246,135,203 and 226,734,372        
Shares Issued and Outstanding at June 30, 2018 and 2017  246,136   226,735 
Additional Paid-In Capital  21,952,560   20,768,185 
Shares to Be Issued, Preferred Shares  2,000,000   2,000,000 
Shares to Be Issued, Common Shares  467,996   467,996 
Accumulated Deficit  (34,859,835)  (28,563,409)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit  (10,193,142)  (5,100,493)
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit  2,187,963  $1,145,663 

Assets As of June 30,
Current Assets: 2020 2019
     Cash $441,004  $34,371 
     Accounts Receivables, Net  134,517   218,145 
     Inventory, Net  679,471   356,285 
     Loan Receivable, current  1,365   85,533 
     Loan Receivable – related parties, current  122,535   —   
     Other Current Assets  263,404   2,719,875 
     Right of use assets, current  270,363   —   
         
Total Current Assets  1,912,659   3,414,209 
         
     Equipment, Net  499,047   476,585 
     Intangible Assets  9,800   11,200 
     Other Assets  54,163   23,970 
     Loan Receivable – related parties, noncurrent  196,000     
     Right of use assets  835,392   —   
     Advanced to Investments  —     18,000,000 
         
Total Assets $3,507,062  $21,925,965 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit        
Current Liabilities:        
     Note Payable Due to Bank  25,982   25,982 
     Accounts Payable and
     Accrued Liabilities
  1,583,228   1,431,379 
     Customer Deposits  466,337   287,789 
     Customer Overpayment  47,890   42,307 
     Unearned Revenue  53,248   61,672 
     Other Payables  691,801   420,450 
     Accrued Interest  494,740   507,218 
     Accrued Compensation and
     Personnel Related Payables
  35,361   24,528 
     Note Payable – Current  20,000   20,000 
     Note Payable – Related Parties, Current  15,427   18,000 
     Lease Liability – Current  372,285   —   
     Loan Payable, current  319,314   214,585 
     Loan Payable – Related Parties, Current  35,943   30,000 
     Convertible Note Payables, Net, Current  1,740,122   1,046,909 
     Derivative Liabilities  5,597,095   2,991,953 
     Warrant Liabilities  79,910   24,658 
     Share to Be Issued  101,577   100,000 
         
Total Current Liabilities  11,680,260   7,247,431 
         
     Loan Payable  197,946   —   
     Lease Liability  767,729   —   
         
Total Liabilities  12,645,935   7,247,431 
         
Stockholders’ Deficit:        
Preferred Stock, $0.001 Par Value, 10,000,000 Shares Authorized, 3,541,500 and 2,000,000  Shares Issued and Outstanding at June 30, 2020 and June 2019, respectively  3,542   2,000 
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value, 10,000,000,000  Shares Authorized, 1,763,277,230 and 697,608,570 Shares Issued and Outstanding at June 30, 2020 and 2019  1,763,278   697,610 
Additional Paid-In Capital  57,307,767   61,038,875 
Common Stock Subscribed  236,008   —   
Shares to Be Issued, Common Shares  —     29,000 
Accumulated Deficit  (68,438,332)  (47,088,950)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit  (9,127,737)  (14,678,534)
Non-Controlling Interest  (11,136)  —   
Total Stockholders’ Deficit of Sugarmade Inc.  (9,138,875)  (14,678,534)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) $3,507,062  $21,925,965 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 -33-

Sugarmade, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Operations

  For the Years Ended June 30,
  2018 2017
Revenues, Net $4,439,324  $4,100,560 
         
Cost of Goods Sold  3,226,365   2,832,798 
         
Gross Profit  1,212,959   1,267,762 
         
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses  2,545,906   3,986,314 
         
Loss From Operations  (1,241,947)  (2,718,552)
         
Non-Operating Income (Expense):        
     Interest Expense  (2,077,900)  (352,300)
     Warrant Expense  —     (25,250)
     Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities  (540,580)  (437,000)
     Stock Based Compensation  (1,067,100)  —   
     Realized Loss on Notes Converted  —     (1,172,000)
     Other Income (Expense)  18,943   (8,595)
     Loss on settlement  (44,607)  —   
     Loss on Impairment  (65,625)  —   
     Loss on asset disposal  (166,693)  —   
         
Total Non-Operating Income (Expense)  (5,054,480)  (1,995,145)
         
Net Loss  (6,296,426) $(4,713,697)
         
Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Share $(0.03) $(0.02)
Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share $(0.03) $(0.02)
         
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding*  237,925,753   202,675,344 

*Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debts and exercising of warrants were excluded in calculating diluted loss per share.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 -34-

Sugarmade, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

  Common Stock Additional Paid-In Share to be Issued, Share to be Issued, Accumulated Total
  Shares Amount Capital Preferred Shares Common Shares Deficit  
Balance at June 30, 2016  178,685,388  $178,686  $17,151,379  $2,000,000  $1,246,000  $(23,849,712) $(3,273,647)
                             
Shares Issued for Debt Settlement  25,441,007   25,441   1,767,524   —     251,996   —     2,044,961 
Shares Issued for Equity Financing  2,403,846   2,404   122,596   —     125,000   —     250,000 
Shares Issued for Compensation  29,207,131   29,207   1,713,683   —     (1,230,000)  —     512,890 
Shares Issued for Intangible Asset  —     —     —     —     75,000   —     75,000 
Warrants Expired  —     —     4,000   —     —     —     4,000 
Shares Cancelled  (9,003,000)  (9,003)  9,003   —     —     —     —   
Net Loss  —     —     —     —     —     (4,713,697)  (4,713,697)
                             
Balance at June 30, 2017  226,734,372   226,735   20,768,185   2,000,000   467,996   (28,563,409)  (5,100,493)
                             
Shares Issued for Debt Settlement  13,492,560   13,493   293,317   —     —     —     306,810 
Reclass Note Conversion  —     —     509,323   —     —     —     509,323 
Initial Valuation of BCF  —     —     125,642   —     —     —     125,642 
Shares Issued for Compensation  4,736,842   4,737   175,263   —     —     —     180,000 
Shares Issued for Cash  1,171,429   1,171   80,829   —     —     —     82,000 
Net Loss  —     —     —     —     —     (6,296,426)  (6,296,426)
                             
Balance at June 30, 2018  246,135,203  $246,136  $21,952,560  $2,000,000  $467,996  $(34,879,069) $(10,212,377)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 -35-

Sugarmade, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Operations

  For the Years Ended June 30,
  2020 2019
Revenues, Net $4,362,585  $4,367,644 
         
Cost of Goods Sold  2,851,940   3,368,659 
         
Gross Profit  1,510,645   1,268,985 
         
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses  1,734,830   1,627,713 
Advertising and Promotion Expense  430,141   203,213 
Marketing and Research Expense  514,394   44,883 
Professional Expense  1,128,896   848,158 
Salaries and Wages  572,683   337,609 
Stock Compensation Expense  9,255,277   3,122,486 
Total Selling, General and Administrative Expenses  13,636,221   6,184,062 
         
Loss From Operations  (12,125,567)  (4,915,077)
         
Non-Operating Income (Expense):        
     Interest Expense  (1,613,044)  (1,418,754)
     Warrant Expense  (119,526)  15,742 
     Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities  (1,442,295)  (4,191,727)
     Stock Based Compensation      —   
     Amortization of Debt Discount  (3,823,500)  (1,026,324)
     Bad Debt  (240,157)  —   
     Debt Forgiveness  590,226   (298,510 
     Other Income (Expense)  3,064   34,473 
     Gain on debt conversion  (184,626)  8,763 
     Loss on settlement  (393,135)  (432,495)
     Loss on Impairment  (2,066,958)  —   
     Loss on asset disposal  (119,044)  (5,242)
         
Total Non-Operating Income (Expense)  (9,408,994)  (7,314,073)
         
Income Tax Expense  —     —   
         
Net Loss  (21,534,562) $(12,229,151)
         
 Less: net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest  (195,416)  —   
Net loss attributable to SugarMade Inc.  (21,339,146)  (12,229,151)
         
Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Share $(0.02) $(0.02)
Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share $(0.02) $(0.02)
         
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding*  939,171,416   496,507,241 

*Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debts and exercising of warrants were excluded in calculating diluted loss per share.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 -36-

Sugarmade, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

  Preferred Stock Common stock Additional paid-in Shares to be issued, preferred Common Stock Shares to be issued, common Accumulated Non Controlling Total Shareholders'
  Shares Amount Shares Amount capital shares Subscribed shares deficit Interest Equity
Balance at June 30, 2017  —    $—     226,734,372  $226,735  $20,768,187  $2,000,000  $—    $467,996  $(28,563,409) $—    $(5,100,492)
Shares issued for debts settlement  —     —     12,754,812   12,755   272,661   —     —     —     —     —     285,416 
Reclass Derivative liability from conversion  —     —     —     —     509,323   —     —     —     —     —     509,323 
Initial valuation of BCF  —     —     —     —     125,642   —     —     —     —     —     125,642 
Shares issued for compensation  —     —     4,736,842   4,737   175,263   —     —     —     —     —     180,000 
Shares issued for debts settlement  —     —     737,748   738   20,656   —     —     —     —     —     21,394 
Share issued for Cash  —     —     1,171,429   1,171   80,829   —     —     —     —     —     82,000 
Net Loss  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (6,296,390)  —     (6,296,390)
Balance at June 30, 2018  —     —     246,135,203  $246,136  $21,952,561  $2,000,000  $—    $467,996  $(34,859,799) $—    $(10,193,106)
Shares issued for debts settlement  —     —     8,658,685   8,659   717,426   —     —     (60,166)      —     665,918 
Reclass Derivative liability from conversion  —     —     —     —     7,335,771   —     —     —     —     —     7,335,771 
Shares issued for conversions  —     —     121,332,262   121,332   2,661,905   —     —     —     —     —     2,783,237 
Initial valuation of BCF  —     —     —     —     149,143   —     —     —     —     —     149,143 
Share issued for Cash  —     —     14,842,857   14,843   500,157   —     —     (125,000)      —     390,000 
Shares issued for service compensation  —     —     96,639,563   96,640   6,757,834   —     —     (253,830)      —     6,600,643 
Shares issued for LOI  —     —     10,000,000   10,000   1,165,000   —     —     —     —     —     1,175,000 
Shares issued for Award - Bizright  —     —     200,000,000   200,000   17,800,000   —     —     —     —     —     18,000,000 
Shares issued for EB-5  2,000,000   2,000   —     —     1,998,000   (2,000,000)  —     —     —     —     —   
Option for Service  —     —     —     —     1,080   —     —     —     —     —     1,080 
Net Loss  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (12,229,151)  —     (12,229,151)
Balance at June 30, 2019  2,000,000   2,000   697,608,570  $697,610  $61,038,875  $—    $—    $29,000  $(47,088,950) $—    $14,678,534 
                                             
Share issued for cash  —     —     138,461,538   138,462   551,817   —     236,008   —     —     —     926,287 
Shares issued for conversions note of principal and interest  —     —     1,077,643,486   1,077,642   971,128   —     —     —     —     —     2,048,771 
Reclass Derivative liability from conversion  —     —     —     —     2,819,825   —     —     —     —     —     2,819,825 
Share issued for warrant exercises  —     —     28,381,818   28,382   (14,249)  —     —     —     —     —     14,133 
Option granted  —     —     —     —     118,750   —     —     —     —     —     118,750 
Share issued for services compensation  415,000   415   1,500,000   1,500   5,945,835   —     —     —     —     —     5,947,750 
Share issued for officer's compensation  1,126,500   1,127   —     —     2,927,773   —     —     —     —     —     2,928,900 
Shares issued for debts settlement  —     —     19,181,818   19,182   300,273   —     —     (29,000)  —     —     290,455 
Initial valuation of BCF  —     —     —     —     449,301   —     —     —     —     —     449,301 
Shares issued/cancelled for Award - Bizright  —     —     (199,500,000)  (199,500)  (17,786,542)  —     —     —     —     —     (17,986,042)
Indigo & Budcars Investment  —     —     —     —     169,262   —     —     —     —     —     169,262 
Changes in non-controlling interest  —     —     —     —     (184,280)  —     —     —     —     184,280   —   
Cumulative effect of ASU 2016-02      —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (10,236)  —     (10,236)
Net Loss  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     (21,534,562)  (195,416)  (21,577,533)
Balance at June 30, 2020  3,541,500   3,542   1,763,277,230  $1,763,278   57,307,767  $—    $236,008  $—    $(68,438,331) $(11,136) $(9,138,871)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 -37-

Sugarmade, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

  For the Years Ended June 30,
  2018 2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:        
     Net Loss $(6,296,426) $(4,713,697)
     Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Cash Flows from Operating Activities:        
          Bad Debt Expense  —     (45,990)
          Inventory Impairment Loss  —     70,332 
          Change in exercise of warrant  5,554   25,250 
          Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability  525,394   (437,000)
          Derivative Expense and amortization of debt discount  1,781,373   —   
          Realized Loss on Notes Converted  —     1,172,000 
          Initial valuation of debt discount  237,547   —   
          Stock Compensation Expense  1,038,270   1,257,261 
          Depreciation and Amortization Expense  105,558   42,587 
     Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities        
          Accounts Receivable  (340,405)  95,638 
          Inventory  36,980   (170,300)
          Other Assets  (11,670)  (61,120)
          Loan Receivable  (147,872)  —   
          Prepayment, deposits and other receivables  (566,229)  —   
          Amount due to a related party  (23,086)  —   
          Checks Issued in Excess of Cash  —     (28,377)
          Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities  222,010   123,560 
          Customer Deposits  96,918   (15,708)
          Unearned Revenue  46,838   (30,218)
          Accrued Interest and Other Payables  385,439   (76,428)
Net Cash (Used in) Operating Activities  (2,894,210)  (1,918,210)
         
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:        
          Intangible  (7,325)  —   
          Payment for Acquisition of Property and Equipment  (171,096)  (24,052)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities  (178,421)  (24,052)
         
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:        
          Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock  82,000   125,000 
          Proceeds from Share to be Issued  1,798,000   125,000 
          Proceeds from (Repayment of) Loan  136,228   (566,453)
          Proceeds from Loan  —     795,420 
          Advance from Related Parties  —     1,445,301 
          Repayment to Related Parties  (226,078)  (1,650,560)
          Proceeds from Convertible Note  1,222,722   1,769,523 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities  3,012,872   2,043,231 
         
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash  (59,759)  100,969 
         
Cash, Beginning of Year  101,880   911 
Cash, Ending of Year  42,121   101,880 
         
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:        
     Cash Paid During the Period for:        
          Interest Expense  —     144,200 
          Income Taxes  —     25,212 
         
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Financing Activities:        
     Debts Settled Through Shares Issuance  227,000   620,965 

  For the year ended
June 30,
  2020 2019
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(21,339,146) $(12,229,151)
Non-controlling interest  (195,416)  —   
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flows from operating activities:        
Excess of debt discount  449,301   149,143 
Loss on settlement  393,135   295,963 
Gain on debt forgiveness  590,226   (16,649)
Amortization of debt discount  3,823,500   1,026,324 
Stock based compensation  9,225,076   4,280,136 
Change in fair value of derivative liability  2,109,930   4,040,237 
Change in exercise of warrant  119,525   (15,742)
Depreciation    110,032   71,390 
Amortization of intangible assets  1,400   —   
Impairment loss  2,066,958   —   
         
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  83,628   235,478 
Inventory  (323,186)  173,915 
Prepayment, deposits and other receivables  403,471   (788,308)
Loan receivable  —     72,339 
Other assets  (30,193)  14,781 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  423,199   108,581 
Customer deposits  184,131   587 
Unearned revenue  (8,424)  (48,470)
Right of use assets  (650,165)  —   
Lease liability  674,188   —   
Interest Payable  (96,046)  306,214 
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,984,876)  (2,323,231)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Payment for property and equipment  (132,494)  (351,395)
         
Net cash used in investing activities  (132,494)  (351,395)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from shares issuance  690,280   100,000 
Loan receivable  84,168   —   
Loan receivable - related parties  (318,535)  —   
Proceeds from advanced shares issuance  136,000   205,000 
Proceeds (Repayment) from(to) loans - related parties  5,943   —   
Proceeds from convertible notes  1,626,045   2,330,500 
Payment to Note payable-related parties  (2,573)  (5,000)
Proceeds (Repayment) from(to) loans  302,675   36,376 
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  2,524,003   2,666,876 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  406,633   (7,750)
         
Cash paid during the period for:        
Cash, beginning of period  34,371   42,121 
Cash, end of period $441,004  $34,371 
Cash paid interest  47,614   —   
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities —        
Shares issued for conversion of convertible debt  1,959,497   564,051 
Reduction in derivative liability due to conversion  2,819,825   7,335,771 
Debt discount related to convertible debt  3,315,037   2,783,235 
Debts settled through shares issuance  229,000   3,217,870 
Shares issued for advanced payments  —     2,641,000 
Shares issued for warrant exercise  28,381   —   
CS issued for reward to Bizright  (32,291,060)  —   
CS cancelled to terminate Bizright Acquisition  32,283,910   —   
Reclassification from prepaid deposit to BZRTH investment  (883,958)  —   
Advanced to investment  —     18,000,000 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 -36--38-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.                   Nature of Business

 

Sugarmade, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as ''we''“we”, ''us"“us” or "the/“the/our Company''Company’’) is a publicly traded company incorporated in the state of Delaware. Our previous legal name was Diversified Opportunities, Inc. Our Company, Sugarmade, Inc. operates much of its business activities through our subsidiary, Sugarmade,SWC Group, Inc., a California corporation ("SWC Group,(“SWC’’).

Sugarmade, Inc. was founded in 2010. In 2014, CarryOutSupplies.com was acquired by Sugarmade, Inc., - CA'').creating the Company as it is today. As of the end of the reporting period, June 30, 2018,2020, we were involved in severaltwo businesses including the supply of products to the quick service restaurant sub-sector of the restaurant industry and as an importer, distributor and marketer of hydroponic supplies to various agricultural sectors. We had previously been a distributormarketer of culinary seasoning products Seasoning Stix and Sriracha Seasoning Stix and a marketer of tree-free paper products. These products derived from non-wood sources. Wewere discontinued during 2018 in order to focus the majority of our corporate resources on the marketing of hydroponic supplies.

The marketplace in which we plan to be mainly engaged is generally referred to as hydroponic agricultural supplies. While some of our customers are headquarteredengaged in Monrovia, California, a suburbthe legal cultivation, processing and/or distribution of Los Angeles, with two (2) additional warehouse locations in Southern California. As of date of this filing,cannabis or cannabis containing products, our Company neither sells any products containing cannabis nor do we employ 7 full-time workers.handle, process, or distribute any products containing cannabis.

 

Our Board of Directors believes the legal cannabis-related supply sector could be highly lucrative for the Company, and thus we plan to pursue a strategy of expanding operations within this area. According to the State of Legal Marijuana Markets Report (4th Edition), published by Arc View Market Research and produced by New Frontier, California is the largest medical marijuana program in the country among states where medical marijuana is currently legal. The California market is fueled by the state's large size, longevity as the first-in-the-nation medical marijuana program, and low barriers to patient access. Even with California's newly passed recreational marijuana law, which will significantly tighten the program with new restrictions; the market is still projected to reach $2.6 billion in sales in 2020. That is nearly double Colorado's $1.5 billion, and over five times the size of the markets in Arizona, Oregon, and Michigan for that year. If legalized in 2016, the medical marijuana markets in Ohio and Pennsylvania will become two of the largest in the country by 2020. According to the data, a handful of states in the western U.S. project to command over 50% of the medical marijuana market by 2020. As more and more states legalize both medical and recreational cannabis, we believe our company can benefit from our Internet and e-commerce marketing activities.

As of the date of this filing, our mainlegacy business operation, CarryOutSuppies.com,CarryOutSupplies.com, is a producer and wholesaler of custom printed and generic supplies servicing more than 3,0002,000 quick service restaurants. Our products include double poly paper cups for cold beverage; disposable, clear, plastic cold cups, paper coffee cups, yogurt cups, ice cream cups, cup lids, cup sleeves, food containers, soup containers, plastic spoons and many other similar products for this market sector. CarryOutSupplies.com was founded in 2009 when the founders gained first-hand experience within the restaurant industry of the difficulty for restaurant owners to acquire custom printed supplies at a reasonable cost. Many quick service restaurants wish to acquire custom printed products, such as those embossed with logos, but the minimum order size for such customization had been cost prohibitive. With that in mind, carry out supplies was founded to provide products to this underserved section of the market. Since that time, the company has become a key supplier to many popular U.S. franchises, particularly in the frozen dessert segments. The company estimates it holds approximately 40% market share

In December 2017, the Company entered into a master marketing agreement with BizRight, LLC (“BizRight”), a leading marketer and manufacturer of generichydroponic growth supplies, which offers a range of hydroponics-related products including: HPS grow lights, electronic ballasts, HPS Bulbs, nutrient mixes, environmental control products, pH measurement and printedcalibration solutions and other grow and storage products. BizRight operates the ZenHydro.com website and other e-commerce properties, and sells various products withinto distributors and retailers. On April 11, 2018, the take-out frozen yogurtsame rights under the master marketing agreement were assigned to BZRTH. On February 5, 2019, the Company exercised its option to acquire BZRTH and ice cream industries. We also holdthe transaction closed on October 30, 2019. On January 15, 2020, the Company entered into a product supplyRescission and licensing agreement FreeHand® ThumbTray™ for the western partMutual Release Agreement (“Agreement”) with each of the United States.parties agreeing to rescind the transaction and return all consideration exchanged pursuant to the Stock Exchange Agreement.

 

We are also a distributor of paper made from 100% reclaimed sugarcane fiber, enhanced with bamboo. Sugarcane fiber, called bagasse, is a discarded byproduct of sugarcane production. Sugarmade, Inc. was founded in 2010. As is explained below, in 2014, CarryOutSupplies.com was acquired by Sugarmade, Inc., creatingOn February 7, 2020, the Company entered into a share sale and purchase agreement with Indigo Dye Group Corp. ("Indigo"). Indigo carries on business as it is today. Relativea cannabis delivery business under the name BudCars and the Company has an interest in making an investment in Indigo in order to Sugarmade Paper, our third- party contract manufacturer uses bagassefurther its corporate growth goals. Pursuant to the terms of the share sale and bamboo, as opposed to wood products significantly reducing its manufacturing carbon footprint, energy consumption, and attendant water pollution during the manufacture of its products. This allows us to offer our unique, exclusive, tree-free paper products at price-parity equal to or less than current recycled fiber products already on the market. Our products are unique and we believe offer an ideal solution for those consumers (both corporate and individual) seeking to meet their sustainability mandates or personal environmentally conscious goals, at a price that is equal to or less than current recycled products.purchase agreement:

 

Our primary focusSugarmade agreed to invest $700,000 (the “Investment”) into Indigo for inventory, equipment, and marketing expenses. The Investment shall be made in twelve monthly equal installments of $58,333 with the acceleration of the payment schedule possible depending on business growth, cash flow needs and capital availability.

Sugarmade receive a 40% of Indigo’s issued shares. The value used for this business unit astransaction is $1,750,000. In the event that the Company is not able to make a payment of filing$58,333 in any month, it will have 90 days to cure the default. On the 91st day the investment plan will cease and the amount of this reportinvested capital will be calculated based on an enterprise value of $1,750,000 or $17,500 per 1% of owned equity.

In addition, subject to the terms and conditions of the share purchase agreement (option provisions), the Company may acquire an additional 30% interest in Indigo. Upon exercise of the option, the Company will obtain control over Indigo.

Since late May 2020, the Company has been actively involved in development of Indigo’s operations with power to direct the activities and significantly impact Indigo’s economic performance. The Company also has obligations to absorb losses and right to receive benefits from Indigo. As such, in accordance with ASC 810-10-25-38A through 25-38J, Indigo is considered an VIE of the organization and administration of fundraisers and paper drives for schools, non-profits and other institutions.Company.

 

 -37--39-

During September of 2016, the Company completed negotiations for and signed a license agreement with HUY FONG FOODS, INC. ("HFFI"), the maker of Sriracha Hot Chili Sauce. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is granted license to use the licensed marks of HFFI on and for products the Company is currently in process of designing and testing. Based on this agreement and a separate license agreement signed during 2015 with Seasoning Stix International, LLC, the Company plans to introduce a new culinary seasoning product named Sriracha Seasoning Stix. Sriracha Seasoning Stix are encapsulated Huy Fong Sriracha Sauce and other seasonings in the form of a stick, which are inserted into meat, fish and poultry prior to cooking. Sriracha Seasoning Stix are a hard solid at room temperature, but as heat is applied the sticks begin to liquefy allowing the meat fibers to act like a sponge absorbing the seasonings and flavors that had previously been encapsulated in the stick. The Company launched its SrirachaStix.com web platform using Shopify on October 1, 2017, and aggressive marketing tactic has been implemented via a nationwide advertising and social media campaign. As of the date of this filing, this newly built website had already generated over $150,000 in online revenue.

2.                   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of presentation

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Principles of consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sugarmade-CAsubsidiary, SWC Group Inc., and SWC.Indigo Dye Group Corp., a variable interest entity (“VIE”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Going concern

 

The Company'sCompany’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations, in which it has not been successful, and/or obtaining additional financing from its shareholders or other sources, as may be required.

 

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Management is endeavoring to increase revenue-generating operations. While priority is on generating cash from operations through the sale of the Company'sCompany’s products, management is also seeking to raise additional working capital through various financing sources, including the sale of the Company'sCompany’s equity and/or debt securities, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms to our Company, or which may not be available at all. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue our business as desired and our operating results will be adversely affected. In addition, any financing arrangement may have potentially adverse effects on us and/or our stockholders. Debt financing (if available and undertaken) will increase expenses, must be repaid regardless of operating results and may involve restrictions limiting our operating flexibility. If we issue equity securities to raise additional funds, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current holders of our common stock.

 

 -38--40-

Use of estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

 

Revenue recognition

 

We recognize revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification ("(“FASB ASC''ASC’’) No. 605,606, Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when an arrangement and a determinable fee occur, and when collection is considered to be probable and products are delivered, or title has been transferred. This generally occurs upon shipment of the merchandise, which is when legal transfer of title occurs. In the event that final acceptance of our product by the customer is uncertain, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met. We currently have a consignment arrangement with two of our customers. We record revenue on consignment goods when the consigned goods are sold by the consignee and all other above-mentioned revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Cash deposits received in connection with the sales of our products prior to their being delivered or acceptance if applicable is recordedasdeferred revenue.

Adoption of ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers"

Sugarmade Inc. is planning on implementing Topic 606. Results for reporting periods beginning within the next fiscal year will be presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605.

Sugarmade experienced no impact to the opening balance of the accumulated deficit or revenues for any quarterly period as a result of applying Topic 606.

Sugarmade will applyapplied a five-step approach in determining the amount and timing of revenue to be recognized: (1) identifying the contract with a customer, (2) identifying the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (5) recognizing revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied.

 

Substantially all of Sugarmade’sthe Company’s revenue is recognized at the time control of the products transfers to the customer.

 

Additionally, Sugarmade has substantially increased its accounting and financial staffs and enhanced its information technology and accounting systems software to ensure proper and effective implementation of Topic 606. 

Cash

Cash and cash equivalents consist of amounts held as bank deposits and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.Leases

 

From timeIn February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing ASU No. 2016-02, which requires lessees to time, werecognize the rights and obligations created by leases on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, and ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (ROU) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the statement of operations.

The new standard became effective April 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may maintain bank balances in interest bearing accounts in excesschoose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of the $250,000 currently insuredearliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporationnew standard for interest bearing accounts (there isthe comparative periods. The Company adopted the new standard on July 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition approach as of the effective date of the initial application. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Company elected the “package of practical expedients”, which permits entities not to reassess under the new lease standard prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company does not expect to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements.

The most significant effects of the adoption of the new standard relate to the recognition of new ROU assets and lease labilities on our balance sheet for office operating leases and providing significant new disclosures about our leasing activities.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. The Company has also elected the short-term leases recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means that the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets and lease liabilities, for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. The Company also currently no insurance limitexpects to elect the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for depositsits leases. All existing leases are reported under this rule.

Under ASC 840, leases were classified as either capital or operating, and the classification significantly impacted the effect the contract had on the company's financial statements. Capital lease classification resulted in noninterest bearing accounts). We havea liability that was recorded on a company's balance sheet, whereas operating leases did not experienced any losses with respectimpact the balance sheet. Since the Company elected not to cash. Management believes ourrecast the prior year financial statements, $455,590 of operating lease right-of-use asset and $465,826 of operating lease liabilities were not retroactively reflected to June 30, 2019 financial statements after the new adoption, and $1,105,755 of operating lease right-of-use asset and $1,140,041 of operating lease liabilities were reflected to June 30, 2020 financial statements due to the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to its cash.entered into new lease contracts during the year ended June 30, 2020.

 

 -39--41-

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts, net of any estimated allowances for doubtful accounts. We grant unsecured credit to our customer's deemed credit worthy. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed and potential credit losses estimated by management are charged to operations on a regular basis. At the time, any particular account receivable is deemed uncollectible, the balance is charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company had accounts receivable net allowances of $453,623 as of June 30, 2018 and of $113,218 as of June 30, 2017.

Inventory

Inventory consists of finished goods paper and paper-based products such as paper cups and food containers ready for sale and is stated at the lower of cost or market. We value our inventory using the weighted average costing method. Our Company's policy is to include as a part of inventory any freight incurred to ship the product from our contract manufacturers to our warehouses. Outbound freights costs related to shipping costs to our customers are considered period costs and reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses. We regularly review inventory and consider forecasts of future demand, market conditions and product obsolescence.

If the estimated realizable value of our inventory is less than cost, we make provisions in order to reduce its carrying value to its estimated market value. On a consolidated basis, as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, the balance for the inventory totaled 531,249 and $568,229, respectively. $120,486 were reserved for obsolescent inventory for the year ended June 30, 2018, and $70,332 were reserved for obsolescent inventory for the year ended June 30, 2017.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

Long-lived assets, which include property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

 

Recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset'sasset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. Based on its review, the Company believes that, as of June 30, 2018, performed an2020, there was 2,066,958 impairment test of allloss of its intangible assets. Based on the company’s analysis, the company had an impairment of $65K.long-lived assets.

 

Income taxes

 

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their perspective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are recorded, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

 

As a result of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes ("(“ASC 740''740’’), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax position, as defined, ASC 740 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspect of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes.

 

 -40-

We adopted the provisions of ASC 740 as of October 2, 2008 and have analyzed filing positions in each of the federal and state jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have identified the U.S. federal and California as our ''major''‘major’ tax jurisdictions and generally, we remain subject to Internal Revenue Service examination ofafter our 2013 U.S. federal income tax returns. However, we have certain tax attribute carryforwards, which will remain subject to review and adjustment by the relevant tax authorities until the statute of limitations closes with respect to the year in which such attributes are utilized.

 

We believe that our income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and do not anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material change to our financial position. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to ASC 740. In addition, we did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of ASC 740. Our policy for recording interest and penalties associated with income-based tax audits is to record such itemsasa component of income taxes. We have not taken any uncertain positions that would necessitate recording of tax related liability as of June 30, 20182020 and 2017.2019.

 

 -42-

Stock based compensation

 

Stock based compensation cost to employees is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and will be recognized as expense over the employee'semployee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). We estimate the fair value of employee stock options granted using the Binomial Option Pricing Model. Key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options will include the exercise price of the award, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, the expected option term, the risk-free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected volatility and the expected annual dividend yield on our common stock. We use our company'scompany’s own data among other information to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected forfeiture rate. Share-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable.

 

Loss per share

 

We calculate basic earnings per share ("EPS"(“EPS”) by dividing our net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without considering common stock equivalents. Diluted BPS is computed by dividing net income or net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted average number of dilutive common stock equivalents, such as options and warrants. Options and warrants are only included in the calculation of diluted EPS when their effect is dilutive.

 

Fair value of financial instruments

 

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

Level 1- observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

Level 3 - unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

 

The Company used Level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology for the derivative liabilities for conversion feature of the convertible notes and warrants in determining the fair value using Lattice Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:

 

  Carrying Value Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2018 Using Fair Value Hierarchy
  June 30, 2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Derivative Liabilities  3,069,652       —    3,069,652
Total            
       June 30, 2017      June 30, 2018
Expected Life (Years)      0.74   —    0.5
Risk Free Interest Rate      1.68%  —    2.06%
Expected Volatility      161%  —    151%

 -41-

Derivative instruments

 

The fair value of derivative instruments is recorded and shown separately under liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives liability are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations under non-operating income (expense).

 

Our Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a weighted average Black-Scholes- Merton option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12months12 months of the balance sheet date.

 

 -43-

Segment Reporting

 

FASB ASC Topic 280, "Segment Reporting''“Segment Reporting’’, requires use of the ''management approach"“management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the way a company'scompany’s management organizes segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure, or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company.

 

FASB ASC Topic 280 has no effect on the Company'sThe Company’s financial statements as substantially all of its operations are conducted in onethree industry segment -papersegments – (1) paper and paper-based products such as paper cups, cup lids, food containers, etc., which accounts approx. 42% of the Company’s revenues; (2) Non-medical supplies such as non-medical fascial mask, which accounts approx. 25% of the Company’s total revenues; (3) Cannabis products delivery service and sales, which accounts approx. 33% of the Company’s total revenues.

 

New accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption ofhave adopted this ASU on the consolidated financial statements.

 -42-

In May 2014,statements in the FASB issued No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605 - Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Codification. The standard requires that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue versus Net). In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of ASU 2014-09 and 2014-16, and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. These ASUs clarify the implementation guidance on a few narrow areas and adds some practical expedients to the guidance Topic 606. The Company is evaluating the effect that these ASUs will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.quarter ended September 30, 2019.

 

On March 30, 2016,In December 2019, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting which includes amendments toStandards Update (ASU) 2019-12, “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. The pronouncement simplifies the accounting for income taxes at settlement, forfeitures,by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. The pronouncement also improves consistent application of and net settlements to cover withholding taxes. The amendments insimplifies GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. ASU 2016-09 are2019-12 will be effective for public companies forus beginning in the first quarter of fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2017 and this standard does not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently2021, with early adoption permitted. We are still evaluating the impact that the standardthis guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 clarifies the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has implemented ASU 2016-15 on its financial statements and related disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16—Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This ASU improves the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than invent tory. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has implemented ASU 2016-16 on its financial statements and related disclosures.

 -43-

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim period within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The standard should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company has implemented ASU 2016-18 on its financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The standard should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting this standard prospectively upon any transactions of acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The guidance should be adopted on a prospective basis for the annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on itsour consolidated financial statements.

 

Prior period reclassification

 

Certain prior period balance sheet accounts have been reclassified in conformity with current period presentation including reclassification of $4,000 from derivative liability to warrant liability. The reclassification had no effect to the company'scompany’s consolidated statement of operations, statement of cash flow or statement of shareholder'sshareholder’s equity.

 

3.                   Concentration

 

Customer

 

For the year ended June 30, 2018,2020, our Company earned net revenues of $4,439,324.$4,362,585. The company does not have any concentration of revenue with any customer that represent over 10% of overall revenue. The highest revenue from (2) customers accounted for 8.51%5.90% and 6.96%5.1% respectively, as percentage of overall revenue for the year ended June 30, 2018.2020.

 

For the year ended June 30, 2017,2019, our Company earned net revenues of $4,100,560.$4,347,644. The vast majoritycompany does not have any concentration of these revenues for the periods were derived from a large number of customers,revenue with no customers accounted forany customer that represent over 10% of the Company's total revenues in either period.overall revenue. The highest revenue from (2) customers accounted for 8.37%7.90% and 5.75%7.69% respectively, as percentage of overall revenue for the year ended June 30, 2017.2019.

 

 -44-

Suppliers

 

For the year ended June 30, 2018,2020, we purchased products for sale by the company'scompany’s subsidiaries from several contract manufacturers located in Asia and the U.S. A substantial portion of the Company'sCompany’s inventory is purchased from two (2) suppliers. The two (2) suppliers accounted as follows: Two suppliers accounted for 36%25.5% and 17.50%16.20% of the Company'sCompany’s total inventory purchase for the year ended June 30, 2018,2020, respectively.

 

For the year ended June 30, 2017,2019, we purchased products for sale by the company’s subsidiaries from several contract manufacturers located in Asia and the U.S. A substantial portion of the Company’s inventory is purchased from two (2) suppliers. The two (2) suppliers accounted as follows: Two suppliers accounted for 36.71%31.21% and 39.03%17.80% of the Company'sCompany’s total inventory purchase for the year ended June 30, 2019, respectively.

Concentration of risk

The Company sells non-medical facial mask during the year ended June 30, 2020, which accounts approx. 25% of the total revenue of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2020. Because of the demanding of non-medical facial mask is declining, the masks are not selling at a profitable price, and the sales of the non-medical facial mask may decrease in the future.

 

4.                   Equity Transaction – Exclusive License Rights 

 

OnDuring December 13, 2017, wethe Company entered into a Master Marketing Agreementmaster marketing agreement with BizRight, Hydroponic, Inc. (“BizRight”),LLC, a leading marketer and manufacturer of cannabis and hydroponic growth supplies, which offers a range of hydroponics-related products including: HPS grow lights, electronic ballasts, HPS Bulbs, nutrient mixes, environmental control products, pH measurement and calibration solutions and other cannabis-related grow and storage products. BizRight operates the ZenHydro.com website and other e-commerce properties, and sells various products to distributors and retailers. On April 11, 2018, the same rights under the master marketing agreement were assigned to BZRTH Inc. On February 5, 2019, the Company exercised its option to acquire BZRTH and the transaction closed on October 30, 2019. On January 15, 2020, the Company entered into a Rescission and Mutual Release Agreement (“Agreement”) with each of the parties agreeing to rescind the transaction and return all consideration exchanged pursuant to the Stock Exchange Agreement.

 

Under5.        VIE

On February 7, 2020, the Company entered into a share sale and purchase agreement with Indigo Dye Group Corp. ("Indigo"), a corporation located in Sacramento, California. Indigo carries on business as a cannabis seller and delivery business under the name BudCars. The major Cannabis Products include Flower, Edibles, Vape Cartridges, Pre-Rolls, & Concentrates, etc. All the prodicuts are finished goods. In addition, Indigo is operating a non-store front retail delivery business (Type-9 License# C9-0000286) in California.

The Company has an interest in making an investment in Indigo in order to further its corporate growth goals. All the parties agree as follows:

The Company will invest Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000) (the “Investment”) into Indigo for inventory, equipment, and marketing expenses. The Investment shall be made in twelve monthly equal installments of $58,333 with the acceleration of the payment schedule possible depending on business growth, cash flow needs and capital availability.

The Company will receive a Forty Percent (40%) of the issued shares in Indigo Dye. upon execution of the final agreement. The value used for this transaction is $1,750,000 and each percentage (1%) of the company is worth $17,500. In the event that the Company is not able to make a payment of $58,333 in any month, it will have 90 days to cure the default. on the 91st day the investment plan will cease and the amount of invested capital will be calculated based on an enterprise value of $1,750,000 or $17,500 per 1% of owned equity.

In addition, subject to the terms and conditions of the Master Marketing Agreement, all products procured, developed and imported by BizRightshare purchase agreement (three years option provisions), the Company will be sold by the Company. The expected termtake considerations to acquire an additional 30% interest in Indigo. Upon exercise of the exclusive license rightsoption, the Company will obtain control over Indigo.

Since late May 2020, the Company has been actively involved in development of Indigo’s operations with power to direct the activities and significantly impact Indigo’s economic performance. The Company also has obligations to absorb losses and right to receive benefits from Indigo. As such, in accordance with ASC 810-10-25-38A through 25-38J, Indigo is 20 years. BizRight and its owners will be compensated via a combination of cash and common shares in Sugarmade. Effective the contract date, Bizright will be compensated Two hundred million (200,000,000) common shares. Sugarmade will compensate BizRight and its owners six million dollars ($6,000,000) in cash. The amount due will be divided over 3 payments equally and are contingent upon the filingconsolidated as an VIE of the S-1Company.

 -45-

Presented below are condensed financial position data and significant funding.operating results of the Indigo’s business segments for the four months ended June 30, 2020.

  

As of June 30, 2020
Current Assets647,554
Non-Current Assets94,017
Total Assets741,571
Total Liabilities389,349
Total Equity352,222
Total Liabilities & Equity741,571
Gross Profit656,933
Expense923,139
Net Loss280,604

 -46-

 

5.6.                   Litigation

 

From time to time and in the course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief. The amount of the ultimate liability, if any, from such claims cannot be determined. As of June 30, 2018,2019, there were no legal claims pending or threatened against the Company; the opinion of our management would be likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, as of the date of this filing, we were involved in the following legal proceedings.

 

On February 4, 2014, the Company filed suit in Contra Costa County, California, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy to commit breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, conversion, breach of contract, and interference with contractual relations against, Diversified Products Group Inc. (DPG), Stephen Pinto, Lewis Cohen and Heidi Estiva, who were former sales agents for the Company. Stephen Pinto is the Company's former Chairman of the board of directors. The Company plans to actively pursue this case. During November of 2014, the Company received notice that a cross complaint had been filed against the Company. The complaint alleges the parties were induced to make a series of investments in the Company by the material misrepresentations and omissions made by the Company. The Company believes the allegations are without merit The Company plans to vigorously defend against such claims. The parties have attended mediation on the matters on September 7, 2018, and executed a stipulation for a settlement agreement. However, the final settlement agreement is currently pending.

Outstanding Litigation On December 11, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint from two convertible note holders and investors in the Company. On February 21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the matter of Hannan vs. Sugarmade. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the company agreed to pay the plaintiffs $227,000 to settle all claims against the Company, which included the payoff of two notes outstanding. The parties had estimated the value of the notes at approximately $80,000. As of June 30, 2020, third parties had purchased two (2) notes of approximately $80,000. As of the date of this filing, there remains a balance, plus accrued interest on the $227,000 and on the $80,000 due under the notes. 

 

 -45-

On December 11, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint from two Convertible Note Holders and investors in the Company, Lovitt & Hannan, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan FBO J. Thomas Hannan, Attorney at Law 401K Plan and Trust, and Kevin M. Kearney. The Company's former CEO, Scott Lantz, was also named in the suit.

On February 21, 2017, the Company signed a settlement agreement with the plaintiff in the matter of Hannan vs Sugarmade. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to pay the plaintiffs' $227,000 to settle all claims against the Company, which included the payoff of the two notes outstanding within one (1) week. The parties had estimated the value of the notes at approximately $80,000. The Company agreed to pay the plaintiff $97,000 within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the settlement with the remaining balance of $50,000 due within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the settlement. Upon receipt of all payments, plaintiffs will surrender for cancellation 230,000 of the Company's shares within ten (10) days. The parties agreed that all claims against the Company would be satisfied through such payments and that the matter would be fully resolved. As of June 30, 2018, third-parties had purchased two (2) notes of approximately $80,000, reducing the Company's exposure by $80,000. As of the date of this filing the balance for accrued legal settlement for Hannan vs Sugarmade has been reduced to $227,000.

On August 13, 2019, a lawsuit was filed against the Company for unpaid legal fees of $50,000 which originated from the Company’s former chairman and CEO. The Company was served in or around September 2019. The Company entered into a sentiment and owes a remaining total of $30,000, payable at the rate of $10,000 per month under this agreement. 

 

There can be no assurances the ultimate liability relative to these law suitslawsuits will not exceed what is outlined above.

 

6.Other Current Assets

7. Cash

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of amounts held as bank deposits and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.

From time to time, we may maintain bank balances in interest bearing accounts in excess of the $250,000 currently insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for interest bearing accounts (there is currently no insurance limit for deposits in noninterest bearing accounts). We have not experienced any losses with respect to cash. Management believes our Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to its cash.

8. Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts, net of any estimated allowances for doubtful accounts. We grant unsecured credit to our customer’s deemed credit worthy. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed and potential credit losses estimated by management are charged to operations on a regular basis. At the time, any particular account receivable is deemed uncollectible, the balance is charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company had accounts receivable, net of allowance, of $134,517 and $218,145 as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively; and allowance for doubtful accounts of $447,498 and 412,666 as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 -47-

9. Loan Receivable

Loan receivables amounted $1,365 and $85,533 as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Loan receivables are mainly advanced payments to the other companies.

10. Loan Receivable – Related Parties

Loan receivables – related parties amounted $122,535 and $0 as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Loan receivables – related parties are mainly advanced payments to the related party companies for business expense.

11. Inventory

Inventory consists of finished goods paper and paper-based products such as paper cups and food containers ready for sale and is stated at the lower of cost or market. We value our inventory using the weighted average costing method. Our Company’s policy is to include as a part of inventory any freight incurred to ship the product from our contract manufacturers to our warehouses. Outbound freights costs related to shipping costs to our customers are considered period costs and reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses. We regularly review inventory and consider forecasts of future demand, market conditions and product obsolescence. The total inbound freight costs are $274,475 & $247,263 as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

If the estimated realizable value of our inventory is less than cost, we make provisions in order to reduce its carrying value to its estimated market value. On a consolidated basis, as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the balance for the inventory totaled $679,471 and $356,285, respectively. $15,445 were reserved for obsolescent inventory for the year ended June 30, 2020, and $14,548 were reserved for obsolescent inventory for the year ended June 30, 2019.

12. Other Current Assets

As of June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, other current assets consisted of the following:

 

  For the years ended June 30,
  2018 2017
Prepaid Deposit $355,500  $57,500 
Prepaid Inventory  92,737   84,065 
Employees Advance  41,303   30,078 
Prepaid Expenses  246,260   4,894 
Others  20,765   13,801 
Total $756,565  $190,338 

  For the years ended June 30,
  2020 2019
Prepaid Deposit $48,483  $2,145,000 
Prepaid Inventory  65,449   172,045 
Employees Advance  324   16,052 
Prepaid Expenses  35,157   358,702 
Others  113,991   28,075 
Total $263,404  $2,719,875 

 

7.13. Intangible Asset

 

On August 21,April 1, 2017, the Company entered into ana distribution and intellectual property assignment agreement with Sound DecisionsWagner Bartosch, Inc. (“Wagner’’) for use of their Divider’™ used in frozen desserts and other related uses. In lieu of cash payment under the agreement, the Company was obliged to revampissue common shares of the company’s shopify website to generateCompany valued at $75,000 for acquiring the use right of the distribution and attract more traffic from potential customers. The Company made a payment of $14,000 for the website (intellectual property).intellectual property. The Company amortized this use right as intangible asset over ten years, and recorded $1,400 and $1,400 amortization expense for the yearyears ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

14. Property, Plant and Equipment

As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

  June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019
Office and equipment $739,447  $709,745 
Motor vehicles  164,244   96,265 
Leasehold Improvement  24,742   21,970 
Total  928,163   827,980 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (429,116)  (351,395)
Plant and Equipment, net $499,047  $476,585 

For the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, depreciation expenses amounted to $110,032 and $71,390, respectively.

The Company reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment, no impairment expenses for property, plant, and equipment was recorded in operating expenses during the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

15. Advanced to Investment

During December 2017, the Company entered into a master marketing agreement with BizRight, LLC, a leading marketer and manufacturer of hydroponic growth supplies, which offers a range of hydroponics-related products including: HPS grow lights, electronic ballasts, HPS Bulbs, nutrient mixes, environmental control products, pH measurement and calibration solutions and other grow and storage products. BizRight operates the ZenHydro.com website and other e-commerce properties, and sells various products to distributors and retailers. On April 11, 2018,. the same rights under the master marketing agreement were assigned to BZRTH Inc. On February 5, 2019, the Company exercised its option to acquire BZRTH and the transaction had been closed on October 30, 2019 in total fair value of $18,000,000. On January 15, 2020, the Company entered into a Rescission and Mutual Release Agreement (“Agreement”) with each of the parties agreeing to rescind the transaction and return all consideration exchanged pursuant to the Stock Exchange Agreement.

As of June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, the advanced to investments were $0 and $18,000,000.

 

 -46--48-

16. Unearned Revenue

Unearned revenue amounted $53,248 and $61,672 as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Unearned revenues are mainly due to contracts with extended payment terms, acceptance provisions and future delivery obligation.

17. Other Payable

Other payable amounted 8.$691,801 and $420,450 as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Other payables are mainly credit card payables and taxes payables. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had 8 credit cards, one American Express is a charge card with no limit and zero interest. The remaining 7 cards had total credit limit of $85,000, and APR from 11.24% to 29.99%.

18. Convertible Notes

 

As of June 30, 20182020 and 2017,June 30, 2019, the balance owing on convertible notes, net of debt discount, with terms as described below was $2,399,941$1,740,122 and $1,502,023,$1,046,909, respectively.

 

Convertible notes issued prior to the year ended June 30, 20172019 were as follows:

Convertible note 1: On August 24, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $25,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2018,2020, the note is in default.

 

Convertible note 2: On September 18, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $25,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2018,2020, the note is in default.

 

Convertible note 3: On December 21, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $100,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 25% discount of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2018,2020, the note is in default.

  

Convertible note 4: On December 19, 2016, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $20,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 5: On January 17, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $25,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 6: On January 17, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $20,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. The note has been fully converted as of June 30, 2018.

Convertible note 9: On January 20, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $80,000. The note has a term of seven (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 7: On January 24, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $43,000. The note has a term of twelve (12) months with an interest of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 45% discount to the then current market price of our shares. This convertible promissory note has been fully converted in the year ended June 30, 2018.

Convertible note 8: On February 8, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $50,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

 -47-

Convertible note 10: On February 24, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $66,023. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 11: On February 9, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $50,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 12: On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $75,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 13: On March 1, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $100,000. The note has been purchased by other investor in total amount of $156,067 with a term of nine (9) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 45% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, there were $92,500 has been converted into2020, the Company’s common stock and the remaining principal balance was $7,500. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 14: On March 23, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $70,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 15: On February 15, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $63,000. The note has a term of nine (9) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. This convertible promissory note has been fully converted in the year ended June 30, 2018.converted.

 

Convertible note 16: On February 16, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $30,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 17: On March 31, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $200,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount to the then current market price of our shares. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

Convertible note 18 & 19:5: On May 17, 2017, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an investor for a total amount of $1,375,000 (after $10,000 legal and due diligence fee) with an OID of $125,000, the note will be fulfilled through a series of funding. The note is due 12 months after each funding date and bearbears an interest rate of 10%. The conversion price for the note is 55% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. In connection with the note, the investor will also receive warrants and is calculated based on 15% of the maturity amount. The warrants have a life of four years with exercise price of $0.15 per share and have cashless exercise option. The Company received $505,000 from this note duringDuring the yearthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018. The fair value2019, the holder exercised 1,766,544 cashless warrant shares into 28,381,818 shares of the warrantsCompany’s common stock. On September 23, 2019, the remaining warrant shares were $40,400 at grantsettled by exchange $200,000 convertible note with interest of 10% per annum, due on September 23, 2020, with conversion price of 55% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the original principal balance has been fully converted, the remaining default charge balance of $250,000 has been forgave.

Convertible note 6: On September 20, 2018, the Company had outstandingentered a convertible promissory note payable to thiswith an accredited investor for $671,004 (with two major default charge ina total amount of $166,004),$267,500 (includes $5,000 legal fee and an OID of $12,500). The note is due 360 days and bears an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the fair valuenote is 55% of the warrant liability was $40,400.lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2018,2020, the note is in default and bears a default interest rateprincipal balance of 22% per annum.

 -48-

Convertible notes issued during245,000 has been fully converted into the year ended June 30, 2018 were as follows: Company’s common stock.

 

Convertible note 7: On July 17, 2017,November 1, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $164,900.$100,000. The note has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.025.$0.07. As of June 30, 2020, the note is in default.

 

Convertible note 8: On August 3, 2017,November 16, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $150,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 45% discount to average of 3 lowest trading price during last 20 trading days. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

On August 22, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $35,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days prices.

On September 15, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $150,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 10% and is convertible to common shares at a 45% discount to average of 3 lowest trading price during last 20 trading days. As of June 30, 2018, the note is in default.

On September 26, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $15,000. The note has a term of six (6) months with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days prices.

On December 7, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $50,000.$80,000. The note has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.05.$0.07. As of June 30, 2020, the note is in default.

 

Convertible note 9: On November 16, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for $40,000. The note has a term of one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of the year ended June 30, 2020, the note is in default.

Convertible note 10: On December 3, 2018, the Company’sCompany entered into a convertible notes consistedpromissory note with an accredited investor for $35,000. The note has a term of following:one year with an interest rate of 8% and is convertible to common shares at a fixed conversion price of $0.07. As of June 30, 2020, the note is in default.

Principal Default Penalty Conversion in Principal Number of Shares Balance as of 6/30/2018 Due Date Interest Rate Conversion Price
$25,000              $25,000  2/24/2013  14% 75% of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date
$25,000              $25,000  3/18/2013  14% 75% of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date
$100,000              $100,000  6/21/2013  14% 75% of the average of 30 days prior to the conversion date
$20,000              $20,000  7/17/2017  8% 40% discount of average of last 20 trading days
$25,000              $25,000  7/17/2017  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$20,000      $20,000   737,748   —    7/17/2017  8% Greater of $0.05 or 40% discount to average of 3 lowest trading price during 20 trading days
$43,000      $43,000   2,462,180   —    1/24/2018  8% 45% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$50,000              $50,000  8/8/2017  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$80,000              $80,000  7/20/2017  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days

 

 -49-

$66,023              $66,023  8/24/2017  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$50,000              $50,000  8/9/2017  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$75,000              $75,000  7/31/2017  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$100,000      $92,500   5,246,524  $7,500  12/1/2017  10% 50% discount of average three lowest price of last 20 trading days
    $56,067          $56,067  12/1/2017  10% 50% discount of average three lowest price of last 20 trading days
    $7,273          $31,097  12/1/2017  10% 50% discount of average three lowest price of last 20 trading days
    $7,270          $29,654  12/1/2017  10% 50% discount of average three lowest price of last 20 trading days
$70,000              $70,000  9/23/2017  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$63,000      $63,000   3,081,746   —    11/20/2017  8% 42% discount of average three lowest price of last 10 trading days
$30,000              $30,000  8/16/2017  8% Greater of $0.05 or 40% discount to average of 3 lowest trading price during 20 trading days
$200,000              $200,000  9/30/2017  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$340,000  $78,482          $418,482  5/12/2018  22% 45% discount of lowest price of last 20 trading days
$165,000  $87,522          $252,522  5/12/2018  22% 45% discount of lowest price of last 20 trading days
    $80,000          $80,000  5/12/2018  22% 45% discount of lowest price of last 20 trading days
    $170,000          $170,000  5/12/2018  22% 45% discount of lowest price of last 20 trading days
$150,000              $150,000  5/3/2018  10% 45% discount of average three lowest price of last 20 trading days
$150,000              $150,000  6/15/2018  10% 45% discount of average three lowest price of last 20 trading days
$164,900              $164,900  7/17/2018  8% $0.025
$35,000              $35,000  8/22/2018  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$15,000              $15,000  9/26/2018  8% 40% discount of average two lowest price of last 20 trading days
$50,000              $50,000  12/7/2018  8% $0.025
 Total:      $218,500      $2,426,245         

Convertible note 11: On December 26, 2018, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $250,000 (includes $5,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 45% of average three lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 12: On January 8, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $105,000. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 35% of average two lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 13: On January 22, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 42% of average three lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 14: On January 24, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $53,000. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 35% of average two lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 15: On February 26, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 42% of average three lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 16: On March 4, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $250,000 (includes $7,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 58% of average two lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 17: On April 2, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 40% of average three lowest closing bid for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully repaid by cash.

Convertible note 18: On April 4, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 58% of average two lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 19: On May 2, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 40% of average three lowest closing bid for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully repaid by cash.

Convertible note 20: On May 7, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $2,500 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 58% of average two lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully repaid by cash.

Convertible note 21: On May 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 40% of average three lowest closing bid for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully repaid by cash.

Convertible note 22: On June 12, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $2,500 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 58% of average two lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully repaid by cash.

 

 -50-

Convertible notes issued during the year ended June 30, 2020 were as follows:

Convertible note 23: On July 3, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 40% discount of average three lowest closing bid for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully repaid by cash.

Convertible note 24: On July 30, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $162,000 (includes $7,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 40% discount of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 25: On August 14, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $153,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 10%. The conversion price for the note is 65% of the average of lowest two closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 26: On August 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $275,000 (includes $37,500 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 27: On August 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $275,000 (includes $25,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 28: On September 23, 2019, the Company entered a warrant settlement agreement to exchange convertible promissory note for a total amount of $200,000. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 10%. The conversion price for the note is 55% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully settled by $127,321 of cash and 18,181,818 shares of common stock.

Convertible note 29: On September 27, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $165,000 (includes $16,250 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 30: On September 27, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $165,000 (includes $16,250 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 55% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the note holder converted $50,000 principal with $2,992 interest expense into 56,007,062 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of June 30, 2020, the remaining note balance was $115,000.

Convertible note 31: On October 28, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $225,500 (includes $23,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

 -51-

Convertible note 32: On October 28, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $225,500 (includes $23,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 33: On November 14, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the average three lowest closing bid for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date. As of June 30, 2020, the note has been fully converted.

Convertible note 34: On November 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,150 (includes $11,150 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 35: On November 29, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,150 (includes $11,150 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 36: On December 10, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,700 (includes $11,700 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 37: On December 10, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $106,700 (includes $11,700 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 38: On December 27, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $112,200 (includes $12,200 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 39: On October 31, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $139,301. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008 per share.

Convertible note 40: On November 1, 2019, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000. The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is $0.008 per share.

Convertible note 41: On January 3, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $112,200 (includes $12,200 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

 -52-

Convertible note 42: On January 14, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $150,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 43: On January 22, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $128,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 10%. The conversion price for the note is 35% discount to average of two lowest closing prices for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 44: On February 4, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $110,000 (includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is $0.001 per share.

Convertible note 45: On February 18, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $100,000 (includes $10,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is $0.001 per share.

Convertible note 46: On March 5, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $125,000 (includes $3,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 47: On April 24, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $75,000 (includes $2,000 OID). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 38% discount to average of three lowest closing prices for the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 48: On June 10, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $36,300 (includes $3,300 OID and $3,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

Convertible note 49: On June 18, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $36,300 (includes $3,300 OID and $3,000 legal expense). The note is due 360 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest closing bid for the 20 consecutive trading days prior to the conversion date.

In connection with the convertible debt, debt discount balance as of June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019 were $880,879 and $1,189,341, respectively, and were being amortized and recorded as interest expenses over the term of the convertible debt.

 -53-

As of the year ended June 30, 2018,2020, the Company’s debt discountconvertible notes consisted of following:

 

Date of

 

 

Due Date

 

 

Related Debt OID

 Debt Discount at 6/30/2017 Amortization during 6/30/2018 Debt Discount at 6/30/2018
8/3/2017 5/3/2018 $150,000  $—    $150,000     
9/15/2017 6/15/2018  150,000   —     150,000     
8/22/2017 8/22/2108  35,000   —     29,918   5,082 
9/26/2017 9/26/2018  15,000   —     11,384   3,616 
5/12/2017 5/12/2018  30,000   13,232   13,232     
6/12/2017 6/12/2018  15,000   28,263   28,263     
9/28/2017 5/12/2018  78,482   —     78,482     
11/14/2017 5/12/2018  87,522   —     87,522     
8/8/2017 12/1/2017  56,067   —     56,067     
10/13/2017 12/1/2017  15,298   —     15,298     
11/14/2017 12/1/2017  42,280   —     42,280     
11/17/2017 5/12/2018  80,000   —     80,000     
11/25/2017 5/12/2018  170,000   —     170,000     
7/17/2017 7/17/2018  164,900   —     160,445   4,455 
12/7/2017 12/7/2018  50,000   —     36,849   13,151 
Total debt discount   $1,139,549  $41,495  $912,446  $26,303 
Start Date End Date Debt Discount
As of 6/30/2019
 Addition Amortization Debt Discount
As of 6/30/2020
9/27/2019 9/25/2019 $—    $148,750  $(113,197) $35,553 
9/27/2019 9/25/2019 $—    $16,250  $(12,366) $3,884 
10/28/2019 10/27/2020 $—    $202,500  $(137,431) $65,069 
10/28/2019 10/27/2020 $—    $23,000  $(15,503) $7,497 
10/28/2019 10/27/2020 $—    $202,500  $(137,431) $65,069 
10/28/2019 10/27/2020 $—    $23,000  $(15,501) $7,499 
11/29/2020 11/30/2020 $—    $95,000  $(55,395) $39,605 
11/29/2020 11/30/2020 $—    $11,150  $(6,502) $4,648 
11/29/2020 11/30/2020 $—    $95,000  $(55,395) $39,605 
11/29/2020 11/30/2020 $—    $11,150  $(6,502) $4,648 
12/10/2019 12/10/2020 $—    $95,000  $(52,691) $42,309 
12/10/2019 12/10/2020 $—    $11,700  $(6,489) $5,211 
12/10/2019 12/10/2020 $—    $95,000  $(52,691) $42,309 
12/10/2019 12/10/2020 $—    $11,700  $(6,489) $5,211 
12/27/2019 12/27/2020 $—    $100,000  $(50,820) $49,180 
12/27/2019 12/27/2020 $—    $12,200  $(6,200) $6,000 
1/3/2020 12/27/2020 $—    $100,000  $(49,861) $50,139 
1/3/2020 12/27/2020 $—    $12,200  $(6,083) $6,117 
1/14/2020 1/14/2021 $—    $147,000  $(67,475) $79,525 
1/14/2020 1/14/2021 $—    $3,000  $(1,377) $1,623 
1/22/2020 1/22/2021 $—    $94,746  $(41,419) $53,327 
1/22/2020 1/22/2021 $—    $3,000  $(1,311) $1,689 
2/4/2020 8/4/2020 $—    $110,000  $(88,846) $21,154 
2/18/2020 8/18/2020 $—    $100,000  $(73,077) $26,923 
3/5/2020 3/5/2021 $—    $122,000  $(39,107) $82,893 
3/5/2020 3/5/2021 $—    $3,000  $(962) $2,038 
4/24/2020 4/24/2021 $—    $73,000  $(13,400) $59,600 
4/24/2020 4/24/2021 $—    $2,000  $(367) $1,633 
6/10/2020 6/10/2021 $—    $30,000  $(1,644) $28,356 
6/10/2020 6/10/2021 $—    $6,300  $(476) $6,776 
6/18/2020 6/18/2021 $—    $30,000  $(986) $29,014 
6/18/2020 6/18/2021 $—    $6,300  $(476) $6,776 
             Total:  $880,879 

 

 -51--54-

9.19.                   Derivative Liabilities

 

The derivative liability is derived from the conversion features in note 8 and stock warrant in note 10. All were valued using the weighted-average Binomial option pricing model using the assumptions detailed below. As of June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the derivative liability was $3,069,652$5,597,095 and $1,134,000,$2,991,953, respectively. The Company recorded $530,984$1,442,295 and $437,000$4,191,727 loss from changes in derivative liability during the year ended June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2018, the Company changed the method to value the fair market value from Black-Scholes to Binomial Option model. The Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:

 

  June 30, 20182019
Annual Dividend Yield  —   
Expected Life (Years)  0.15-1.000.50-1.00 
Risk-Free Interest Rate  1.13-2.061.92-2.64%
Expected Volatility  94-21287-150%
     
   June 30, 20172020 
Annual Dividend Yield  —   
Expected Life (Years)  0.47-1.000.50-1.00 
Risk-Free Interest Rate  1.08-2.120.16-2.10%
Expected Volatility  103-202113-175%

 

Fair value of the derivative is summarized as below:

 

Beginning Balance, June 30, 2017 $1,134,000 
Additions $1,913,992 
Mark to Market  530,984  
Reclassification to APIC Due to Conversions $(509,324)
Ending Balance, June 30, 2018  3,069,652 

10.Stock Warrants

In connection with the issuance of the promissory notes in 2012, the investors in the aggregate received two-year warrants to purchase up to a total of 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, and two-year warrants purchasing up to a total of 81,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. For purposes of accounting for the detachable warrants issued in connection with the convertible notes, the fair value of the warrants was estimated using the Binomial option pricing formula. The value of all warrants granted at the date of issuance totaled $508,413 and was recorded as a discount to the notes payable. The amount was amortized over the nine (9) month term of the respective convertible note as additional interest expense.

On various dates during June 2014 and December 2014 the Company and holders of certain convertible notes agreed to cancel warrants to purchase common shares in the Company and to extend the due dates on the Notes to July l, 2016. $0.50 warrants and "Bonus Warrants" priced at $0.01, as defined in the original Convertible Note Purchase Agreements we cancelled pertaining to the Note and warrants acquired on the following dates for the following Convertible Notes and amounts. These warrants were expired on July 1, 2016.

Beginning Balance, June 30, 2019 $2,991,953 
Additions $4,522,428 
Mark to Market $1,442,295 
Cancellation of Derivative Liabilities Due to Cash Repayment $(345,582)
Reclassification to APIC Due to Conversions $(3,013,999)
Ending Balance, June 30, 2020  5,597,095 

  

 -52--55-

20.Stock Warrants

On May 17, 2017,September 7, 2018, the Company entered a promissory notesettlement agreement with an investor for a total amount of $1,375,000 (after $10,000 legal and due diligence fee) with an OID of $125,000, the note will be fulfilled through a series of funding.several investors to settle all disputes by issues additional unrestricted shares. In connection with the note theeach individual investor will also receive warrants and is calculated based on 15%equal to the number of the maturity amount.shares the investors own as of the effective date of the settlement agreement. The warrants have a life of fourfive years with an exercise price as of $0.15 per share and have cashless exercise option.the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was $40,400.$56,730. As of June 30, 20182020 and 2017,June 30, 2019, the fair value of the warrant liability was $40,400$1,910 and $25,250,$19,103, respectively.

On February 4, 2020, the Company entered a warrant agreement with an accredited investor up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at exercise price of $0.008 per share, subject to adjustment. The warrants have a life of five years with an exercise price as of the date of exchange. The fair value of the warrants at the grant date was $80,000. As of June 30, 2020, the fair value of the warrant liability was $78,000.

As of June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, the total fair value of the warrant liability was $79,910 and $24,658, respectively.

The Binomial model with the following assumption inputs:

 

Warrants liability:  June 30, 20182019 
Annual dividend yield  —   
Expected life (years)  0.55.0 
Risk-free interest rate  2.061.76%
Expected volatility  151351%
     
     
Warrants issued in May 2017:  June 30, 20172020 
Annual dividend yield  —   
Expected life (years)  3.863.0-5.0 
Risk-free interest rate  1.890.18-1.69%
Expected volatility  440137-318%

 

  Number of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining contractual life
 Outstanding at June 30, 2016   131,250   0.20     
 Expired   131,250   0.20     
 Granted   505,000  $0.15   4 
 Outstanding at June 30, 2017   505,000  $0.15   3.86 
 Expired             
 Granted             
 Outstanding at June 30, 2018   505,000  $0.15   0.5 
  Number of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining contractual life
 Outstanding at June 30, 2016   131,250   0.20     
 Expired   131,250   0.20     
 Granted   505,000  $0.15   4 
 Outstanding at June 30, 2017   505,000  $0.15   3.86 
 Expired             
 Granted             
 Outstanding at June 30, 2018   505,000  $0.15   0.5 
 Expired             
 Granted   578,880   0.034   5 
 Outstanding at June 30, 2019   1,083,880  $0.034   5 
 Expired   (505,000)  0.15     
 Granted   1,000,000   0.008   5 
 Outstanding at June 30, 2020   1,578,880  $0.021   5 

 

 -53--56-

11.21.                Note Payable

 

Note payable due to bank

 

During October 2011, we entered into a revolving demand note (line of credit) arrangement with HSBC Bank USA, with a revolving borrowing limit of $150,000. The line of credit bears a variable interest rate of one quarter percent (0.25%) above the prime rate (3.25% as of September 30, 2013). In the event the deposit account is not established or minimum balance maintained, HSBC can charge a higher rate of interest of up to 4.0% above prime rate. As of June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the loan principal balance was $25,982.

Notes payable due to non-related parties

On June 15, 2018, the Company entered into a promissory note with one of the accredited investors. The original principal amount was $20,000 and the note bears 8% interest per annum. The note was payable upon demand. As of June 30, 2018, the2020 and 2019, this note is in default.had a balance of $20,000 and $20,000, respectively.

 

Notes payable due to related parties

 

On January 23, 2013, the Company entered into a promissory note with its former employee of the Company who owns less than 5% of the Company'sCompany’s stock. The original principal amount was $40,000 and the note bears no interest. The note was payable upon demand. As of June 30, 20182020 and 2017,2019, this note had a balance of $18,000$15,427 and $18,000, respectively.

 

On December 31, 2013, the Company entered into a promissory note with Kalvin Kwong (an employee of the Company, who owns less than 5% of the Company's stock). The principal amount was $20,000 and the interest rate on the note was 10%. The note had a term of six (6) months. However, this note was now payable upon demand per the oral agreement with the lender.

22.                Related Party Transactions

As of June 30, 20182020 and 2019, the Company had outstanding balance of $71,369 and $78,000 owed to various related parties, respectively. See note 11 and 15 for the details.

23.                Loans Payable

On October 1, 2017, SGMD entered a straight promissory note with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater Asia) for borrowing $100,000 with maturity date on June 30, 2018; the note bears an interest rate of 33.33%. As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the note was in default and the outstanding balance under this note hadwas $96,401 and $63,924, respectively.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company entered a series of short-term loan agreements with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater Asia) for borrowing $375,000, with interest rate at 40% - 50% of the principal balance. As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the outstanding balance of $0with Greater Asia loans were $100,000 and $20,000,$100,000, respectively.

 

On January 13, 2014, the Company entered into a promissory note with an employee (an employee of the Company, who owns less than 5% of the Company's stock). The principal amount was $25,000 and the note bears no interest. The note had a term of twenty-four (24) months and was due on January 13, 2016, and became payable upon demand after January 13, 2016. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, this note had a balance of $0 and $12,666, respectively.

On January 14,6, 2015, the Company entered into repayment agreement with its former employee for a promissory note with Richard Ko (an employeeloan of the Company, who owns less than 5% of the Company's stock). The principle amount was $30,000 and the note bore$9,500 at no interest. The note had a term of one (1) year and was due on January 14, 2016, and became payable upon demand after January 14, 2016. As of June 30, 20182020 and 2017, this note had a balance of $5,000 and $20,000, respectively.

As of June 30, 2018 and 2017,2019, the Company has an outstanding balance of notes payable due to related parties$3,584 and $3,584. 

On December 17, 2018, the Company entered into a repayment agreement with an individual for $100,000 at no interest. As of $23,000June 30, 2020 and $70,666,2019, the Company has an outstanding balance of $0 and $17,834, respectively.

 

12.On July 1, 2012, CarryOutSupplies entered an equipment loan agreement with a bank with maturity on June 21, 2024. The monthly payment is $648. As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the outstanding balance under this loan were $24,524 and $29,243, respectively.

On March 18, 2020, the Company entered into a loan agreement for $150,000 with Celtic Bank with maturity date on March 18, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, the outstanding balance under this loan were $117,635.

On June 26, 2020, the Company entered into a government loan agreement for $8,000 with maturity date on December 26, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, the outstanding balance under this loan were $8,000.

On April 27, 2020, we entered into a loan borrowed $110,000 from Bank of America (“Lender”), pursuant to a Promissory Note issued by Company to Lender (the “PPP Note”). The loan was made pursuant to the Payroll Protection Program established as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The PPP Note bears interest at 1.00% per annum, and may be repaid at any time without penalty. The PPP Note contains customary events of default relating to, among other things, payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, or provisions of the promissory note. The occurrence of an event of default may result in a claim for the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the PPP Note.

The Company accounting for the PPP loan under Topic 470: (a). Initially record the cash inflow from the PPP loan as a financial liability and would accrue interest in accordance with the interest method under ASC Subtopic 835-30; (b). Not impute additional interest at a market rate; (c). Continue to record the proceeds from the loan as a liability until either (1) the loan is partly or wholly forgiven and the debtor has been legally released or (2) the debtor pays off the loan; (d). Would reduce the liability by the amount forgiven and record a gain on extinguishment once the loan is partly or wholly forgiven and legal release is received.

As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had an outstanding loan balance of $517,260 and $214,585, respectively.

 -57-

24.                Loans Payable – Related Parties

 On June 26, 2017, SGMD entered a straight promissory note with a company (whose major shareholder is the former director of the Company) for borrowing $180,820 with maturity date on March 31, 2018; the note bears an interest rate of 12%, commencing on October 31, 2017, and on the last day of each moth thereafter until the notes is paid in full, the Company shall make an interest payment. During the year ended June 30, 2019, all the principles have been converted into the Company’s common stocks. As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the outstanding balance under this note was $0 and $0, respectively.

On July 7, 2016, SWC received a loan from an employee. The amount of the loan bore no interest and amortized on a monthly basis over the life of the loan. As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the balance of the loan were $30,000 and $30,000, respectively.

25.                Shares to Be Issued

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Stockholders’ DeficitCompany had entered into one consulting service agreement and one employment agreement, which had potential shares to be issued in total amount of $101,577.

As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had balance of $101,577 and $100,000 share to be issued.

26.                Equity transactions

 

The Company is authorized to issue 1,990,000,00010,000,000,000 shares of $.001 par value common stock and 10,000,000 shares of $.001 par value preferred stock. On April 22, 2020, the Company filed an amendment to increased the total authorized shares to 10,010,000,000 – 10,000,000,000 shall be designated common stock, par $0.001 per share and 10,000,000 shares shall be designated as preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.

 

During the year ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued 1,171,429 shares of common stock for cash in total amount of $82,000.

 

During the year ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued 4,736,842 shares of common stock for services in total amount of $180,000.

 

During the year ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued 13,492,560 shares of common stock to settle the old debt in total amount of $306,810.

 

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 8,658,685 shares of common stock to settle the old debt in total amount of $665,918.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 121,332,262 shares of common stock to convert the convertible notes in total amount of $2,783,237.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 14,842,857 shares of common stock for cash in total amount of $390,000.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 96,639,563 shares of common stock for services in total amount of $6,660,643.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company (buyer) signed a letter of intent (LOI) regarding a potential acquisition of all the outstanding capital stock, assets and assumption of liabilities of a company (seller). The Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock as the stock compensations upon the signing of the LOI in total amount of $1,175,000. The share is non-refundable and vested immediately, but was issued on a restricted basis with a restrictive legend and will be subject to normal restrictions imposed by the financial industry and governmental agencies.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 200,000,000 shares of common stock as deposit for acquisition of BZRTH with a total value of $18,000,000. See Note 4 for details.

 -58-

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock to multiple investors for EB-5 project to be issued in prior years. 

As of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017,2019, the Company had 246,135,203697,608,570 shares of its common stock issued and 247,395,774outstanding and 2,000,000 shares of its Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 138,461,538 shares of common stock for cash in total amount of $690,287.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 1,077,643,486 shares of common stock to convert the convertible notes in total amount of $1,959,527.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 28,381,818 shares of common stock for warrant exercise in total fair value of $690,287.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock for service in total fair value of $81,200.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 19,181,818 shares of common stock to settle the old debt in total fair value of $290,455.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 249,373,817 shares of common stock for acquisition of BZRTH in total fair value of $3,566,046. The shares were cancelled pursuant to the rescission on January 15, 2020.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 750,001 shares of preferred stock for acquisition of BZRTH in total fair value of $10,725,014. The shares of preferred stock were cancelled pursuant to the rescission on January 15, 2020.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 415,000 shares of series B preferred stock for award to employee bonus in total fair value of $5,934,500.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 1,126,500 shares of series B preferred stock for award to officer’s compensation in total fair value of $2,928,900.

On April 17, 2020, the Company entered into a Series B Waiver Agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”) with its chief executive officer and corporate chairman of its board of directors, Jimmy Chan (“Chan”) relating to Chan’s ownership of One Million Five Hundred Thousand (1,500,000) of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. Under the terms of the Waiver Agreement, Chan waives his rights (a) to the conversion rights granted to him in the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and (b) the rights to proceeds in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up as may be provided in the Certificate of Incorporation pertaining to said Series B Preferred Stock, if any. In the event that there is a merger or consolidation (other than one in which stockholder of the Company own a majority by voting power of the outstanding shares of the surviving or acquiring corporation) or a sale, lease, transfer, exclusive license or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, this event will be treated as a liquidation event. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock continues to vote or have the right to vote, together with the Common Stock as if it were on an as-converted basis, and not as a separate class, subject to any adjustments for stock dividends, splits, combinations and similar events.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had 1,763,277,230 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding.

 

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had 3,541,500 shares of its Series B preferred stock issued and outstanding.

 -54--59-

13.Common Shares Issued for Services

In September 2017, the Company issued 4,736,842 shares of commons stock for services. The fair value of the shares were valued at $0.04, the closing price of the grant date.

14.Related Party Transactions

As of June 30, 2018, the Company had outstanding balance of $23,000 owed to various related parties. See note 11 and 16 for the details.

15.Loans Payable

On October 1, 2017, SGMD entered a straight promissory note with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater Asia) for borrowing $100,000 with maturity date on June 30, 2018; the note bears an interest rate of 33.33%. As of June 30, 2018, the note was in default and the outstanding balance under this note was $79,524.

On January 25, 2017, SWC entered into an agreement with a lending company for $100,000 for its working capital needs. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company has an outstanding balance of $0 and $10,036, respectively.

During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company entered a series of short-term loan agreements with Greater Asia Technology Limited (Greater Asia) for borrowing $375,000, with interest rate at 40% - 50% of the principal balance. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the outstanding balance with Greater Asia loans were $84,400 and $140,125, respectively. As of June 30, 2018. the note was in default.

On July 1, 2016, the Company entered into a repayment agreement with its employee for $20,280 at no interest. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company has an outstanding balance of $4,285 and $6,285. 

On January 6, 2015, the Company entered into repayment agreement with its former employee for a loan of $9,500 at no interest. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company has an outstanding balance of $0 and $4,076, respectively.

On July 2, 2015, the Company entered into a repayment agreement with an individual for $22,583 at no interest. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company has an outstanding balance of $0 and $13,936, respectively.

On March 5, 2013, the Company entered an equipment loan agreement with Toyota financial services with maturity date of April 4, 2018. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the balance under this loan were $0 and $4,308, respectively.

On July 1, 2012, CarryOutSupplies entered an equipment loan agreement with a bank with maturity on June 1, 2017. The monthly payment is $255. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the outstanding balance under this loan were $0 and $261, respectively.

As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had an outstanding loan balance of $329,029 and $1,599, respectively from one (1) vendor of the Company.

 -55-

16.Loans Payable – Related Parties

On June 26, 2017, SGMD entered a straight promissory note with a company (whose major shareholder is the former director of the Company) for borrowing $150,820 with maturity date on March 31, 2018; the note bears an interest rate of 12%, commencing on October 31, 2017, and on the last day of each moth thereafter until the notes is paid in full, the Company shall make an interest payment. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the outstanding balance under this note was $150,820. As of June 30, 2018. the note was in default. As of October 2017, they are no long a related party.

On July 7, 2016, SWC received a loan from an employee. The amount of the loan bore no interest and amortized on a monthly basis over the life of the loan. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the balance of the loan were $30,000 and $34,015, respectively.

On November 21, 2016, SGMD received a loan from the Company’s director. The amount of the loan bore no interest and amortized on a monthly basis over the life of the loan. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the balance of the loan from Sugarmade were $0 and $9,252, respectively.

On December 1, 2016, SGMD received a loan from an employee for $12,500 with an interest charge of $12,500. This amount was recorded as interest owed to the loan payable amount and is to be amortized on a monthly basis over the life of the loan. The loan is due on December 1, 2017. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the balance is $0 and 6,250, respectively.

From time to time, SWC would receive short-term loans from LMK Capital, LLC (“LMK”) for its working capital needs. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had outstanding balance of $0 and $34,107, respectively, borrowed from LMK Capital., LLC, a company affiliated with CEO Chan.

17.Shares to Be Issued

During the year ended June 30, 2018, the Company had entered into multiple private placement agreements and had increased potential shares to be issued in total amount of $1,798,000.

As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had balance of $2,691,000 and $893,000 share to be issued.

18.27.                Commitments and Contingencies

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into a lease for general office and warehouse in City of Industry, California with a lease term of one year. The monthly rent was $11,884. The Company renewed the lease to March 31, 2016, effective April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017, increasing the rent from $11,884 to $13,238. On March 6, 2017, the Company executed a Fifth Amendment to the Lease, in which the Monthly rent increased from $13,238 to $15,043 effective from April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018. As of March 31, 2018, the Monthly rent is $15,043. As of April 1, 2018, the Company has vacated and return the property to the property owner and have no further lease commitment associated with this property.

 

On February 23, 2018 the Company entered into lease agreement for a new office space as part of the plan to expand operation, the lease is set to commence Commencing March 1, 2018. The term of the lease is for a (5) Five Years with 1 month free on the 1st year of the term. The monthly rent on the 1st year will be $11,770 with a 3% increase for each subsequent year. Total commitment for the full term of the lease will be $737,367. As of the date of this filing, this property became the headquarter of the company.

 

Our warehouse along with some office space is located at 20529 East Walnut Drive North, Diamond Bar, California, where we lease approximately 11,627 square feet of combined space. The lease term is for five years and two months ending on April 30, 2025. The current monthly rental payment for the facility is $13,022.

For The Year Ended  
June 30, 2020  
Lease Cost    
Operating lease cost (included in general and administration in the Company’s unaudited condensed statement of operations) $149,976 
     
Other Information    
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities for the year ended June 30, 2020 $108,073 
Remaining lease term – operating leases (in years)  2.67 
Average discount rate – operating leases  10%
The supplemental balance sheet information related to leases for the periods are as follows:    
Operating leases    
Right-of-use assets $1,105,755 
Total operating lease assets $1,105,755 
     
Short-term operating lease liabilities $120,645 
Long-term operating lease liabilities $1,019,369 
Total operating lease liabilities $1,140,014 
     
Maturities of the Company’s lease liabilities are as follows:    
    
Period ending June 30,  Operating 
   Lease 
2021  370,971 
2022  375,515 
2023  315,051 
2024  156,267 
2025  130,222 
Total lease payments  1,348,026 
     
Less: Imputed interest/present value discount  (208,012)
Present value of lease liabilities $1,140,014 

 -56--60-

19.28.                Income Tax

 

The deferred tax asset as of June 30, 20182020 and 20172019 consisted of the following:

 

 2018 2017 2020 2019
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards $11,849,081  $9,711,559  $12,028,883  $11,909,744 
Less Valuation Allowance  (11,849,081)  (9,711,559)  (12,028,883)  (11,909,744)
 $—    $—    $—    $—   

 

Management provided a deferred tax asset valuation allowance equal to the potential benefit due to the Company’s loss. When the Company demonstrates the ability to generate taxable income, management will re-evaluate the allowance.

 

As of June 30, 2018,2020, the Company has net operating loss carryforward of $34,859,835$56,139,045 which is available to offset future taxable income that expires by year 2034.2036.

TCJA modified net operating loss (NOL) rules. For most taxpayers, NOLs arising in tax years ending after 2017 can only be carried forward. Exceptions apply to certain farming losses and NOLs of insurance companies other than a life insurance company.

For losses arising in taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, the new law limits the NOL deduction to 80% of taxable income.

 

Reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the expected tax benefit using the federal statutory rate of 34%21% for 20182020 and 20172018 is as follows:

  

  2018 2017
Income tax benefit at federal statutory rate  (34)%  (34)%
Increase in valuation allowance  34%  34%
Income tax expense  —     —   

20.Subsequent Events

On July 15, 2018, the Company signed a settlement agreement and consulting contract with a services provider. Under the terms of the agreement, the consultant performed specific functions pertaining the wind down of business operations for products previously marketed by the Company, receiving 1,500,000 registered common shares.

On July 20, 2018, the Company sold 1,000,000 common shares to an accredited investor at $0.05 per common share for a total of $50,000.

On July 30, 2018, a consultant paid the Company $1,000 for an option exercised on June 8, 2018. The strike price of the option was $0.002 per share. As of this date, the 500,000 common shares from the option exercise have yet to be issued.

On August 1, 2018, the Company signed a services contract with a consultant for 2,307,693 registered common shares, valued at $150,000 or $0.065 per share.

On August 1, 2018, the Company signed a services contract with a consultant for 538,461 registered common shares, valued at $70,000 or $0.065 per share.

On August 2, 2018, the Company converted a note for $50,000 dated August 3, 2017, into 1,114,491 common shares.

On August 13, 2018, the Company issued 2,500,000 common shares to an accredited investor. The shares were purchased on December 21, 2017 at $0.05 per share for a total of $125,000.

  2020 2019
US federal statutory income tax rate  (21)%  (21)%
State tax – net of benefit  (7)%  (7)%
Non-deductible expenses, net of federal benefit  7%  7%
Increase in valuation allowance  21%  21%
Income tax expense  —     —   

 

 -57--61-

29.Subsequent Events

Convertible Notes

On August 14, 2018,July 16, 2020, the Company convertedentered a convertible promissory note dated September 27, 2017 into common shares.with an accredited investor for a total amount of $260,700. The original face valuenote is due 365 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the note was $15,000, which converted into 294,114lowest price of the common shares.stock traded in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date.

 

On August 14, 2018,July 21, 2020, the Company convertedentered a convertible promissory note dated August 22, 2017 into common shares.with an accredited investor for a total amount of $200,200. The original face valuenote is due 365 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the note was $35,000, which converted into 691,184lowest price of the common shares.stock traded in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date.

 

On August 23, 2018,September 9, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $110,000. The note is due on March 10, 2021 and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is a fixed price of $0.01 per share. After the 6 month anniversary of this Note, the Conversion Price shall be equal to the lower of the Fixed Price or 65% of the lowest trading price of the Common Stock as reported on the National Quotations Bureau OTC Marketplace exchange which the Company’s shares are traded or any exchange upon which the Common Stock may be traded in the future ("Exchange"), for the twenty prior trading days including the day upon which a Notice of Conversion is received by the Company or its transfer agent.

On September 10, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $227,700. The note is due 365 days and bear an interest rate of 8%. The conversion price for the note is 60% of the lowest price of the common stock traded in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date.

On September 24, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $212,300. The note is due on March 25, 2021 and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is a fixed price of $0.01 per share. After the 6 month anniversary of this Note, the Conversion Price shall be equal to the lower of the Fixed Price or 65% of the lowest trading price of the Common Stock as reported on the National Quotations Bureau OTC Marketplace exchange which the Company’s shares are traded or any exchange upon which the Common Stock may be traded in the future ("Exchange"), for the twenty prior trading days including the day upon which a Notice of Conversion is received by the Company or its transfer agent.

On October 8, 2020, the Company entered a convertible promissory note with an accredited investor for a total amount of $231,000. The note is due on April 9, 2021 and bear an interest rate of 12%. The conversion price for the note is a fixed price of $0.01 per share. After the 6 month anniversary of this Note, the Conversion Price shall be equal to the lower of the Fixed Price or 65% of the lowest trading price of the Common Stock as reported on the National Quotations Bureau OTC Marketplace exchange which the Company’s shares are traded or any exchange upon which the Common Stock may be traded in the future ("Exchange"), for the twenty prior trading days including the day upon which a Notice of Conversion is received by the Company or its transfer agent.

Convertible note conversions

Subsequent to October 11, 2020, there were multiple accredited investors converted approx. $1,301,700 of the convertible notes with $64,532 accrued interest into 1,081,411,606 shares of the Company’s common stocks.

Lease

On September 28, 2020, the Company and LMK Capital LLC (“LMK”) entered into a note for $115,698.63 dated August 3, 2017Residential Lease (the “Lease”) pursuant to which LMK agreed to lease to the Company five acres located in Northern California and owned by LMK (the “Property”). Jimmy Chan, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and majority stockholder of the Company, is majority owner of LMK. The term of the Lease begins on October 1, 2020 and ends on September 30, 2023; provided, however, that at the end of the term, the Lease will continue on a month-to-month basis. in the Pursuant to the terms of the Lease, the Company will pay rent in the amount of $50,000 into 1,114,491 common shares.

On August 28, 2018, the Company converted a note dated May 12, 2017 into common shares.$20,000 per month. The original face value of the note was $150,000, which converted into 3,921,569 common shares.

On September 1, 2018, the Company issued a consultant 125,000 common shares for services, based on an agreement with the consultant dated April 5, 2018.

On September 13, 2018, the Company converted a note dated September 15, 2017 into common shares. The original face value of the note was $150,000, which converted into 3,745,330 common shares.

On September 19, 2018, the Company issued a convertible note to an accredited investor for proceeds to the Company in the amount of $250,000. The Company reserved 15,000,000 common shares for future maximum issuance for the eventual conversion.

On September 27, 2018, the Company sold 642,857 common shares to an accredited investor at $0.07 per common share for a total of $45,000.

On October 7, 2018, a consultant paid the Company $500 for an option exercised on June 8, 2018. The strike price of the option was $0.001 per share. As of this date, the 500,000 common shares from the option exercise have yet to be issued.

On October 9, 2018, the Company issued shares in a debt settlement. A total of 500,000 shares were issued at a price of $0.10 per shares, which settled the $39,000 and interest owed by the Company.

On October 10, 2018, the Company issued a convertible note to an accredited investor for proceeds to the Company in the amount of $250,000. The Company reserved 26,000,000 common shares for future maximum issuance for the eventual conversion.

On October 15, 2018, the Company signed a Letter of Intent to acquire Sky Unlimited, LLC doing business as Athena United (“Sky Unlimited”), a Southern California-based, supplier of hydroponic cultivation supplies to the wholesale sector and to large commercial cultivators. Upon execution of LOI,Lease also provides that the Company will pay Sky Unlimited $1,000,000 in common sharesa $250,000 security deposit to LMK. Pursuant to the terms of Sugarmade at $0.10the Lease, the monthly rent will increase to $0.50 per share equal 10,000,000 shares, which will immediately vest assq. ft. on cultivation area upon approval of certificate of occupancy with a non-refundable fee. Sugarmade will be granted 180 days to close on acquisition, If the acquisition is completed, Sky Unlimited will be compensated with cash and Sugarmade shares having a total value equaling one times annualized revenues realized by Sky Unlimited during last 2 quarters of 2018 calendar3% increase each subsequent year. At the projected $40,000,000 annualized revenue realization for Sky Unlimited for the period agreed, it is contemplated Sky Unlimited will be paid a total of $8,000,000 in cash and $32,000,000 in Sugarmade common shares at $0.10 per share.

On October 16, 2018, the Company issued 2,500,000 common shares due to an accredited investor for an investment on December 21, 2017 in the amount of $250,000 at $0.05 per share.

On October 16, 2018, the Company issued 10,00,000 common shares due to an accredited investor for an investment on December 21, 2017 in the amount of $1,000,000 at $0.10 per share.

 

 -58--62-

Item 9.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

As reported on Form 8-K filed on April 10, 2018 with the SecuritiesAccounting and Exchange Commission, or SEC, BF Borgers CPA (“Borgers”) was dismissed as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company effective as of March 21, 2018. The dismissal of Borgers was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Other than an explanatory paragraph included in Borgers’ audit report for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 relating to the uncertainty of the Company's ability to continue as a “going concern”, the audit report of Borgers on the Company's financial statements for the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the Company's 2017, 2016 and 2015 fiscal years and through March 21, 2018, (1) there were no disagreements with Borgers on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Borgers, would have caused Borgers to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their report, and (2) there were no “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.Financial Disclosure

 

As a result of the dismissal of Borgers as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company, on April 2, 2018, the Company engaged L&L CPAS, PA, a PCAOB and CPAB registered firm (“L&L”). Neither we, nor anyone on our behalf, has consulted with L&L regarding (i) the type of final audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the Company that L&L concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or (iii) any reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.None.

 

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

 

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer, who is also our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2018,2020, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").Act. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2018 that2020 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective such that the information relating to us required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")SEC reports: (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms; and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

(b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting

 

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018,2020, there were no changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 -59-

Management'sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company'scompany’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company'scompany’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that

 

 -63-

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate bec02ausebecause of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as ofJune 30, 2018,2019, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework – 2013 (COSO 2013 Framework) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based upon such evaluation, our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as ofJune 30, 2018,2020, based on the COSO framework criteria, as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

 

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board werethe relative inexperience of our management and supporting personnel with the compliance and control requirements of U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting compliance.

 

 -60-

We have taken, and are continuing to take, certain actions to remediate the material weakness related to our lack of U.S. GAAP experience. We plan to hire additional credentialed professional staff and consulting professionals with greater knowledge and experience of U.S. GAAP and related regulatory requirements to oversee our financial reporting process in order to ensure our compliance with U.S. GAAP and other relevant securities laws. In addition, we plan to provide additional training to our accounting personnel on U.S. GAAP, and other regulatory requirements regarding the preparation of financial statements.

 

Notwithstanding the above identified material weakness, the Company'sCompany’s management believes that its condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects the Company'sCompany’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented and that this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

  

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

 -64-

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year endedJune 30, 2018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

Item 9B. Other Information

 

None 

 

 -61-

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

As of the date of this filing,October 13, 2020, the following individuals are the Company’s current officers and directors. Certain information about them, is set forth below:

 

Name Age Position
Jimmy Chan  3941  CEO & Chairman
Chen Long TanChristopher H. Dieterich  3672  CTO &Independent Director

 

Biographies

Jimmy Chan, 39, director (Chairman),has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman since [•]. In addition, he has been, since 2008, the Chief Executive officer of CarryOutSupplies.com, located in the City of Industry.CarryOutSupplies.com. From 2005 to 2007, he served as the Vice-President, for Emergence Capital, operating out of Garden Grove, California, and providing mortgage services to the general public. From 2003 to 2005, he was the Vice-President in charge of operations for Azusa Mobile, a T-Mobile authorized dealer, and prior to that he was the president of Cyber Gift, importing toys for distribution as a wholesaler. He is not an officer nor director of any other public companies.

Chen Long Tan, 36, directorChristopher H. Dieterich, is qualified to serve as a Director by way his extensive legal and Chief Technology Officer brings valuable expertise, particularly relatingbusiness experience. He graduated from Virginia Polytechnic Institute in 1969 (BS Engineering), University of California at Berkeley 1970 (MS Engineering) on full scholarship by Ford Foundation; and the University of California at Los Angeles in 1979 (JD Law/MS Economics), pursuant to large scale IT designa grant from Olin Foundation. He operates a law firm that specializes in SEC filings and implementation,venture capital arrangements, and currently represents 15 reporting public entities. The firm has participated in capital raises for over 50 clients, and hundreds of millions of dollars for those clients. The Board believes Mr. Dieterich adds significant value to Sugarmade that will not only help BizRightcorporate governance, but also to likely continue to grow, but will also provide valuable input toward improvements to other Sugarmade business, such asoperational and capital acquisition efficiency.

The Company does not carry key man life insurance policies on any of the increasingly e-commerce focused CarryOutSupplies.com business and the upcoming marketing and distribution of other products. Mr. Tan is an expertabove principals or key personnel.

Involvement in e-commerce, AI and data mining and is a technology driven business executive.Certain Legal Proceedings

 

As of the end of the 2014 fiscal year (June), the below listed individuals were directors and senior management of the Company. Mr. Mandel, who served as Chairman and as the sole member of the Audit Committee resigned from the Board of Directors on October 6, 2014. Mr. Leong resigned on October 8, 2014. Clifton Kuok Wai Leung. Leung was appointed to our Board of Directors on June 14, 2011. Leung has served as a member of the Board of DirectorsNone of our subsidiary since October 2009, and is alsodirectors, executive officers, significant employees or control persons has been involved in any legal proceeding listed in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K in the Chief Executive Officer and 100% owner of SCPC since early 2006.past 10 years.

 

As ofThere has never been a petition under the end of the 2015 fiscal year (June), Jimmy Chan, Waylon Huang and Er Wang were the directors of the Company. Richard Ko replaced Er Wang as a director on January 1, 2016.

As of February 3, 2017,Bankruptcy Act, or any State insolvency law filed by or against the Company acceptedor its principals or key personnel. Additionally, there has never been a receiver, fiscal agent, or similar officer appointed by a court for the resignation of Waylon Huang. There were no disagreementbusiness or property of any kindsuch persons, or any partnership in which any of such persons was a general partner at or within the past five years, or any corporation or business association of which any such person was an executive officer at or within the past five years.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between Mr. Huang and the company.

As of February 3, 2017, due to vacancy on the board of directors, and pursuant to the Company's by laws, the remaining directors, Jimmy Chan and Richard Ko, then appointed Simon Yu to occupy the open seat on the board of directors.

Effective June 2, 2017, the Company accepts the resignation of Director Simon Yu. Pursuant to Mr. Yu's resignation letter, Mr. Yu's resignation was not due to any disagreementsdirector or conflicts with the Company. Mr. Yu's resignation is necessary to fulfill his obligations and administer his company's operations.

Effective January 29, 2018, the Company accepts the resignation of Director Richard Ko. Pursuant to Mr. Ko's resignation letter, Mr. Ko's resignation was not due to any disagreements or conflicts with the Company. Mr. Ko's resignation is necessary to complete his Master of Business Administration Degree.

executive officer.

 -62--65-

Corporate Governance

During fiscal year 2018 Company's board of directors implemented a program to rectify these material weaknesses. During the fiscal year, additional accounting personnel were engaged by the company in order to improve accounting and reporting functions. Additionally, several programs were implemented internally to streamline our inventory controls, revenue reporting, and overall acting and reporting infrastructure. During the fiscal year, the Board of Directors also engaged several outside consultants to assist in our accounting and finance operations. These personnel worked with our internal staff to identify material weaknesses into implement programs to seek resolutions. These programs have continued into fiscal year 2019.

Leadership Structure

Jimmy Chan, who is also a director and serves as chairman, CEO, CFOprincipal financial officer, principal accounting officer and corporate Secretary. Chen Long TanChristopher H. Dieterich became aan independent director and CTO on January 23, 2018.April 22, 2019.

Board Committees

We do not have a standing audit committee, an audit committee financial expert, or any committee or person performing a similar function. We do not have any board committees including a nominating, compensation, or executive committee.

AsCode of Ethics

The Company has not formally adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that governs the date of this filing, there are no formal committees ofCompany’s employees, officers and Directors as the board of directors.Company is not required to do so.

Director Independence

We currently have noone independent directors.director, Christopher H. Dieterich. We apply the definition of "independent director''“independent director” provided under the Listing Rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (''NASDAQ"(“NASDAQ”). Under NASDAQ rules, the Board has considered all relevant facts and circumstances regarding our directors and has affirmatively determined that none of the directors serving on the Board areChristopher H. Dieterich is independent of us under NASDAQ rules.

Director Compensation

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) ofCurrently, non-employee directors do not receive any compensation for their services as directors. In the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our Company'sfuture, the Company expects to develop and adopt a compensation plan for all directors, and officers and persons who own more than ten-percent (10%) of our Company's common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports of ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership on Forms 4 and 5. Such officers, directors and ten-percent stockholders are also required to furnish our Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. As of June 30, 2018, we do not believe such reports were timely filed.employees.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

AsThe following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in the past two fiscal years for each of start of Octoberour named executive officers

2020 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
(Preferred Shares)
 Stock Awards
(Common Stock)
 Option Awards
($)
 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
 All Other Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
 
                    
Jimmy Chan,  2020  $108,000* 8,629,950** 0      8,377,950     8,377,950  
Chief Executive Officer  2019  $96,000  0           96,000     96,000  

*Beginning on September 1, 2017,2020, Mr. Jimmy Chan will receive annual salary of $48,000$150,000. Upon closing of each acquisition, Mr. Chan will get 10% of the purchase price as special bonus.

**Out of 2,500,000 Series B preferred owned, on April 21, 2002 Form 8-K. Mr. Jimmy Chan agreed to waive the rights to convert 1,500,000 to commons. See Footnote #13 for the waiver disclosure.

Employment Agreements

We do not have contracts in addition towriting with our officers. However, beginning on January 1, 2019, Mr. Jimmy Chan received an annual salary of $96,000 in cash and 5,000,000 common shares earned annually.

In addition, upon closing of each acquisition, Mr. Chan will get 10% of the purchase price as a special bonus. As of January 1, 2020, Mr. Chan receives an annual salary of $108,000 and the datesalary increased to $150,000 starting September 1, 2020 with 50,000,000 commons shares at the end of this filing,Calendar year 2020. In addition, upon closing of each acquisition, Mr. Chen Long Tan compensation have not been determined.

Employment Agreements

Chan will receive 10% of the purchase price as a special bonus. As of Fiscal Year End June 30, 2018, Mr. Chan served as CEO of the company and will be compensatedOctober 13, 2020, 5,000,000 common shares have been issued to Mr. Chan for each calendar year end.

As of2019 and 2020. In the date of this filing, these shares have not been issued. The company is infuture, the process of structuring futureCompany expects to develop and adopt a compensation plan for all directors, officers and employees, as of the date of this filing.employees.

 -63--66-

Grants of Stock and Other Equity Awards

No other equity awards.

Option Exercises

During the fiscal years ending June 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no option exercises by our named executive officers.

Compensation of Directors

Our current Directors do not receive compensation for their service on the board of directors. Unassociated with board service, Director Chan will receive annual salary of $48,000 in addition to 5,000,000 common shares earned annually. As of date of this filing, these shares have not been issued.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 

 

As of Fiscal Year End June 30, 2018,October 13, 2020, below is information with respect to the securities holdings of (i) our named executive officers, (ii) our directors, (iii) our executive officers and directors as a group, and (ii)(iv) all persons (currently none) which, pursuant to filings with the SEC and our stock transfer records, we have reason to believe may be deemed the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the shares of Common Stock.

The securities "beneficially owned"“beneficially owned” by an individual are determined in accordance with the definition of "beneficial ownership"“beneficial ownership” set forth in the regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act and, accordingly, may include securities owned by or for, among others, the spouse and/or minor children of an individual and any other relative who resides in the same home as such individual, as well as other securities as to which the individual has or shares voting or investment power or which each person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of options or otherwise. Beneficial ownership may be disclaimed as to certain of the securities. Table 8 has been preparedThe following table is based on the number of shares outstanding totaling 248,567,2032,847,120,836 as of the date of this filing.October 11, 2020.

Shareholder name Title and position Preferred Series B Stock Preferred B (as converted to common) Common Shares Total Ownership Percentage of Class Beneficially Owned Proxy (voted)
Jimmy Chan CEO, Chairman  2,500,000*  2,500,000,000   19,063,502   2,519,063,502   46.75%  46.75%
LMK Capital LLC Shareholder          11,266,667   11,266,667   0.2%   0.2% 
Christopher Dieterich Director  0   0       0   0.00%  0.00%
Total Issued and Outstanding            2,519,063,502   46.75%  46.75%

 

Officers and DirectorsAmount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percentage of Class Beneficially Owned
Jimmy Chan 14,063,502   5.71%
Richard Ko 4,530,572   2.24%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group 14,546,074   7.95%
Greater than 5% Shareholders       
Amy Thai and LMK Capital LLC 20,644,733   8.37%

AsJimmy Chan is the majority owner of the date of this filing Mr. Jimmy Chan's holdings represent 5.71% of the company. He is currently employed by LMK Capital LLC as management consultant and is therefore a beneficial owner of shares owned by LMK Capital LLC.

Amy Thai and LMK Capital LLC.'s holdings are 9,378,0667,378,066 and 11,266,667 respectively,respectively.

*Out of 2,500,000 Series B Preferred Stock owned since April 21, 2002, Mr. Jimmy Chan agreed to waive his 1,500,000 shares of Series B preferred stock rights (a) to the conversion rights granted to him in the Series B convertible preferred stock and (b) the rights to proceeds in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up as may be provided in the certificate of incorporation pertaining to said series B preferred stock, if any.

As a result, as of the date of this filing, the aggregated amount represents 8.37%Mr. Chan beneficially owned 46.75% of the company.

Subsequent to June 30, 2018, Jimmy Chan is owed 5,000,000 restricted common shares, earned as services shares., and Chen Long Tan is owed 59,138,705 restricted common shares, earned from marketing agreement dated December 13, 2017.

Company’s voting rights.

 -64--67-

Changes in Control

As of the date of this filing, we are not aware of any arrangement that may result in a change in control of our company.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders as well as any equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders as of June 30, 2020.

Plan category Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights (a)
 Weighted
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
 Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in
column (a))
   
Plans approved by our stockholders  1,578,880   0.021   2,096,446 
Plans not approved by stockholders  N/A   N/A   N/A 

Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions and Director Independence

   

Transactions with Related Persons

Our Company reviews transactions between our Company and persons or entities considered to be related parties (collectively “related parties”). Our Company considers entities to be related parties where an executive officer, director or a 5% or more beneficial owner of our shares of Common Stock (or an immediate family member of these persons) has a direct or indirect material interest. Transactions of this nature require the approval of our Board.

Other Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons

The following includes a summary of any transaction occurring since July 1, 2018, or any proposed transaction, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of our average total assets at year-end for the two most recently completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than compensation described under “Executive Compensation” above). We believe the terms obtained or consideration that we paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions described below were comparable to terms available or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arm’s-length transactions.

From time to time, SWC would receiveGroup receives short-term loans from LMK Capital, LLC ("LMK''(“LMK’’) for its working capital needs. As of June 30, 2018,2020, the Company'sCompany’s outstanding balance to LMK is zero.

On December 1, 2016, SGMD receivedJanuary 23, 2013, the Company entered into a loan from anpromissory note with its former employee for $12,500 with an interest chargewho owns less than 5% of $12,500. Thisthe Company’s stock. The original principal amount was recordedasinterest owed to$40,000 and the loannote bore no interest. The note was payable amount and is to be amortized on a monthly basis over the life of the loan. The loan is due on December 1, 2017.upon demand. As of June 30, 2018,2020 and June 30, 2019, this note had a balance of $15,427.

As of June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, the Company had an outstanding balance is zero.of notes payable due to related parties of $15,427 and $18,000, respectively.

 

On July 7, 2016, SWC received a loan in total amount of $30,000 from the same employee indicated above.an employee. The amount of the loan borebears no interest and amortizedis due on a monthly basis over the life of the loan.demand. As of June 30, 2018,2020 and June 30, 2019, the balance of the loan is $30,000.due to related party was $0 and $30,000, respectively.

 

On November 21, 2016, SGMD received a loan from the Company's director. The amount -68-

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

  

(1)Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered to us by the principal accountantsL&L CPAS, PA, our independent registered public accounting firm, for the audit of the registrant's annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the registrant's Form 10-K or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 were $48,769.

(2)Audit-Related Fees

There were no fees billed during the two years ended June 30, 20182020 and 20172019, were as follows:

   Year Ended June 30,
  2020  2019
Audit fees (1) $54,000  $56,658 
Audit-Related fees (2) $12,500   10,000 
Tax fees  —     —   
Other fees  —     —   
Total fees $66,500  $66,658 

  _____________________

(1)Includes fees for (i) audits of our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019; and (ii) fees related to services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
(2)Includes fees for review of our registration statements and offering statements filed with the SEC.

Audit and Non-Audit Service Preapproval Policy

In accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, our board of directors has adopted an informal approval policy that it believes will result in an effective and efficient procedure to preapprove services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

Audit Services. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit (including quarterly reviews) and other procedures required to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to be able to form an opinion on our consolidated financial statements. The board of directors preapproves specified annual audit services engagement terms and fees and other specified audit fees. All other audit services must be specifically preapproved by the board of directors. The board of directors monitors the audit services engagement and may approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions, and fees resulting from changes in audit scope or other items.

Audit-Related Services. Audit-related services are assurance and related services by the principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the registrant'sour consolidated financial statements, which historically have been provided to us by the independent registered public accounting firm and are not reported under item (1).consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The board of directors has approved specified audit-related services within preapproved fee levels. All other audit-related services must be preapproved by the board of directors.

 

(3)Tax FeesServices. The board of directors preapproves specified tax services that it believes would not impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and that are consistent with the SEC rules and guidance. The board of directors must specifically approve all other tax services.

No aggregate fees were billed for professionalAll Other Services. Other services renderedare services provided by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice,independent registered public accounting firm that do not fall within the established audit, audit-related, and tax planning forservices categories. The board of directors preapproves specified other services that do not fall within any of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.specified prohibited categories of services.

 

(4)ProceduresWork Performance. All proposals for services to be provided by others

the independent registered public accounting firm, which must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered and the amount of corresponding fees, are submitted to the chairman of the board of directors and the chief financial officer. The percentagechief financial officer authorizes services that have been preapproved by the board of hours expendeddirectors. The chief financial officer submits requests or applications to provide services that have not been preapproved by the board of directors, which must include an affirmation by the chief financial officer and the independent registered public accounting firm that the request or application is consistent with the SEC rules on auditor independence, to the principal accountant's engagementboard of directors (or its chair or any of its other members pursuant to audit the registrant' s financial statementsdelegated authority) for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant' s full-time, permanent employees was more than 50 percent.approval.

 

 -65--69-

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

Exhibit No. Description
31.1(1)Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
31.2(1)Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
32.1(1)Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
32.2(1)Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
101.INS*(1)XBRL Instance Document
   
101.SCH*(1)XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
   
101.CAL*(1)XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
   
101.DEF*(1)XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
   
101.LAB*(1)XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
   
101.PRE*(1)XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

(a)(1) Filed as an exhibit to this Report.Financial Statements

 

1.The consolidated financial statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are listed in the “Index to Financial Statement. See ConsolidatedStatements and Schedules on page F-1 and included beginning on page F-1.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules for which provision is made in part II, Item 7the applicable accounting regulations of this Annual report on formthe SEC are either not required under the related instructions, are not applicable (and therefore have been omitted), or the required disclosures are contained in the financial statements included herein.

(3) Exhibits.

Exhibit No.Description
3.1Certificate of Incorporation dated June 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to 3/14/2008)
3.2Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated January 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to 3/14/2008)
3.3Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated October 12, 2018 (incorporated by reference to 10/12/2018)
3.4Certificate of Correction of Designations, Powers, Preferences And Other Rights Of The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to 8/20/2018)
3.5Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to 3/14/2008)
10.1Share Purchase Agreement between Company and Indigo Dye Group (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.1 to Form 1-A filed with the Commission on August 17, 2020).
10.2Residential Lease dated September 28, 2020, between the registrant and LMK Capital LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 29, 2020).
21.1*List of Subsidiaries.
24.1*Power of Attorney (set forth on signature page hereto)
31.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

ITEM 16. 10-K SUMMARY

As permitted, the registrant has elected not to supply a summary of information required by Form 10-K.

 

 -66--70-

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance withPursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  

Sugarmade, Inc., a Delaware corporationDate: October 16, 2020

SUGARMADE, INC.

 

 

ByBy: /s/Jimmy ChanDate: November 28, 2018

Name: Jimmy Chan

CEO and DirectorTitle: Chief Executive Officer

 

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

We, the undersigned directors and/or officers of Sugarmade, Inc. hereby severally constitute and appoint Jimmy Chan, acting individually, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this registration statement, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesashe might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

In accordance withPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933,1934, this registration statementreport has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates stated.indicated.

 

SignatureTitleDate

/s/ Jimmy Chan

Jimmy Chan

CEO

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

of the Board (principal

November 28, 2018

October 16, 2020

Jimmy Chan

executive officer, principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer)
/s/ Chenlong Tan

Chenlong Tan

Christopher H. Dietrich

Director

November 28, 2018

Director
October 16, 2020
Christopher H. Dietrich

 

 -67--71-