UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[   ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20142015
or

 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO __________
 
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-35574001-35574
 
EQT Midstream Partners, LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
(Address of principal executive offices)
37-1661577
(IRS Employer Identification No.)

 
15222
(Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (412) 553-5700
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Units Representing Limited Partner Interests New York Stock Exchange
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes  x  No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 
Yes  ¨  No  x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x  No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x  No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer  x
Accelerated filer  ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer  ¨
Smaller reporting company  ¨



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes  ¨  No  x
 
The aggregate market value of the Common Units held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2014: $3.82015: $4.0 billion
 
At January 30, 2015,29, 2016, there were 43,347,45277,520,181 Common Units 17,339,718 Subordinated Units and 1,238,5141,443,015 General Partner Units outstanding.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
PART I
Item 1
Item 1A
Item 1B
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
PART II
Item 5
Item 6
Item 7
Item 7A
Item 8
Item 9
Item 9A
Item 9B
PART III
Item 10
Item 11
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14
PART IV
Item 15
 
 
 


32

Table of Contents

Glossary of Commonly Used Terms, Abbreviations and Measurements
 
adjusted EBITDA – a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure defined by EQT Midstream Partners, LP (the Partnership)(EQM) as net income plus interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense, income tax expense (if applicable) and non-cash long-term compensation expense less other non-cash adjustments (if applicable), equity income, other income, capital lease payments, and Jupiter adjusted EBITDA prior to the Jupiter Acquisition and NWV Gathering adjusted EBITDA prior to the NWV Gathering Acquisition.
 
AFUDC (Allowance for Funds Used During Construction) – carrying costs for the construction of certain long-termlong-lived regulated assets are capitalized and amortized over the related assets’ estimated useful lives. The capitalized amount for construction of regulated assets includes interest cost and a designated cost of equity for financing the construction of these regulated assets.
 
Appalachian Basin – the area of the United States composed of those portions of West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, Kentucky and Virginia that lie in the Appalachian Mountains.

British thermal unit – a measure of the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit.
 
distributable cash flow – a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure defined by the PartnershipEQM as adjusted EBITDA less interest expense, excluding capital lease interest and ongoing maintenance capital expenditures, net of reimbursements.
 
end-user markets the ultimate users and consumers of transported energy products.
firm contracts – contracts for transportation,transmission, storage or gathering services that generally obligate customers to pay a fixed monthly charge to reserve an agreed upon amount of pipeline or storage capacity regardless of the actual pipeline capacity used by a customer during each month.
 
gas – all references to “gas” in this report refer to natural gas.
 
horizontal wells – wells that are drilled horizontal or near horizontal to increase the length of the well bore penetrating the target formation.
 
Jupiter Acquisition On May 7, 2014, the Partnership, its general partner, EQM Gathering Opco, LLC (EQM Gathering), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, and EQT Gathering, LLC (EQT Gathering), a wholly owned subsidiary of EQT Corporation completed the contribution agreement (Contribution Agreement) pursuant to which EQT Gathering(EQT) contributed the Jupiter natural gas gathering system (Jupiter) to EQM Gathering.Gathering Opco, LLC (EQM Gathering), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQM.

liquefied natural gas or LNG natural gas that has been cooled to minus 161 degrees celsius for transportation, typically by ship. The cooling process reduces the volume of natural gas by 600 times.

local distribution company or LDC LDCs are companies involved in the delivery of natural gas to consumers within a specific geographic area.
 
liquefied natural gas or LNG natural gas that has been cooled to minus 161 degrees Celsius for transportation, typically by ship. The cooling process reduces the volume of natural gas by 600 times.
NGA Natural Gas Act of 1938.
 
NGPA – Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978.

omnibus agreement the agreement, as amended, entered into among the Partnership,EQM, its general partner and EQT in connection with the Partnership’sEQM's initial public offering, pursuant to which EQT agreed to provide the PartnershipEQM with certain general and administrative services and a license to use the name “EQT” and related marks in connection with the Partnership’sEQM’s business. The omnibus agreement also provides for certain indemnification and reimbursement obligations between the PartnershipEQM and EQT.
park and loan services - those services pursuant to which customers receive the right to store natural gas in (park), or borrow gas from (loan), the Partnership’s facilities.
 
PSCT – Pipeline Safety Cost Tracker.
 
play a proven geological formation that contains commercial amounts of hydrocarbons.
 
receipt point the point where production is received by or into a gathering system or transportationtransmission pipeline.

4

Table of Contents

 
reservoir a porous and permeable underground formation containing an individual and separate natural accumulation of producible hydrocarbons (crude oil and/or natural gas) which is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is characterized by a single natural pressure system.
 
Sunrise Merger – On July 22, 2013, Sunrise Pipeline, LLC (Sunrise) merged into Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans), aan indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership.EQM.
 

3

Table of Contents

throughput the volume of natural gas transported or passing through a pipeline, plant, terminal or other facility during a particular period.
 
wellhead the equipment at the surface of a well used to control the well’s pressure and the point at which the hydrocarbons and water exit the ground.
 
working gas – the volume of natural gas in the storage reservoir that can be extracted during the normal operation of the storage facility.
 
Abbreviations
 
ASC - Accounting Standards Codification
CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
DOT – U.S. Department of Transportation
FASB – Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC – Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GAAP – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
IPO – Initial Public Offering
IRS – Internal Revenue Service
NYMEX – New York Mercantile Exchange
NYSE – New York Stock Exchange
PA PUC – Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
PHMSA – Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration of the DOT
SEC – Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 
Measurements

Btu = British thermal unit
BBtu = billion British thermal units
Bcf    = billion cubic feet
Bcfe   =  billion cubic feet of natural gas
equivalents, with one barrel of NGLs and crude oil
being equivalent to 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas
Dth dekatherm or million British thermal units
MMBtu  =  million British thermal units
Mcf    = thousand cubic feet
MMcf   = million cubic feet
TBtu = trillion British thermal units
Tcfe = trillion cubic feet equivalent

54

Table of Contents


Cautionary Statements
 
Disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts are forward-looking and usually identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “could,” “would,” “will,” “may,” “forecast,” “approximate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial matters.  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include the matters discussed in the sections captioned “Strategy” in Item 1, “Business” and “Outlook” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the expectations of plans, strategies, objectives, and growth and anticipated financial and operational performance of the PartnershipEQM and its subsidiaries, including guidance regarding the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage and gathering revenue and volume growth; revenue projections; the weighted average contract life of transmission, storage and gathering contracts; infrastructure programs (including the timing, cost, capacity and sources of funding with respect to transmission and gathering expansion projects); the timing, cost, capacity and expected interconnections with facilities and pipelines of the Ohio Valley Connector (OVC) and Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) projects; the ultimate terms, partners and structure of the MVP joint venture; the Partnership's assumption of EQT Corporation's interest in the MVP joint venture;Joint Venture; natural gas production growth in the Partnership’sEQM’s operating areas for EQT Corporation and third parties; asset acquisitions, including the Partnership’sEQM’s ability to complete any asset acquisitions from EQT Corporation or third parties; the amount and timing of distributions, including expected increases; the use of proceeds from EQM capital market transactions; the effect of the Allegheny Valley Connector (AVC) facilities lease on distributable cash flow; future projected AVC lease payments; projected operating and capital expenditures, including the amount of capital expenditures reimbursable by EQT Corporation;EQT; liquidity and financing requirements, including sources and availability; the effects of government regulation and litigation; and tax position. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results.  Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.  The PartnershipEQM has based these forward-looking statements on current expectations and assumptions about future events.  While the PartnershipEQM considers these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are beyond the Partnership’sEQM’s control. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance and results of the Partnership’sEQM’s business and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and the PartnershipEQM does not intend to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
 
In reviewing any agreements incorporated by reference in or filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, please remember that such agreements are included to provide information regarding the terms of such agreements and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Partnership.EQM. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by the Partnership,EQM, which should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties to such agreements should those statements prove to be inaccurate. The representations and warranties were made only as of the date of the relevant agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in such agreement and are subject to more recent developments.  Accordingly, these representations and warranties alone may not describe the actual state of affairs of the PartnershipEQM or its affiliates as of the date they were made or at any other time.

65

Table of Contents


PART I
 
Item 1. Business
 
EQT Midstream Partners, LP (EQT Midstream Partners or the Partnership) closed its initial public offering (IPO) on July 2, 2012.Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) is a Pennsylvania limited partnership and the predecessor for accounting purposes of EQT Midstream Partners.  References in this Form 10-K to the “Partnership,” when used for periods prior to the IPO, refer to Equitrans.  References in this Form 10-K to the “Partnership,” when used for periods beginning at or following the IPO, refer collectively to the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries. Immediately prior to the closing of the IPO, EQT Corporation contributed all of the partnership interests in Equitrans to the Partnership. Therefore, the historical financial statements contained in this Form 10-K reflect the assets, liabilities and operations of Equitrans for periods before July 2, 2012 and EQT Midstream Partners for periods beginning at or following July 2, 2012. Additionally, as discussed below, the Partnership’sEQM’s consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively recast for all periods presented to include the historical results of Sunrise, which was merged into the PartnershipEQM on July 22, 2013, and Jupiter, which was acquired by the PartnershipEQM on May 7, 2014, and the Northern West Virginia Marcellus gathering system (NWV Gathering), which was acquired by EQM on March 17, 2015, as these were businesses and the transactions were transactions between entities under common control. ReferencesAll references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to ‘‘EQT’’ refer collectively"EQM" refers to EQT CorporationEQM in its individual capacity or to EQM and its consolidated subsidiaries.subsidiaries, as the context requires.

Overview
 
EQT Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: EQM) is a growth-oriented limited partnership formed by EQT Corporation (NYSE: EQT) to own, operate, acquire and develop midstream assets in the Appalachian Basin. The Partnership provides substantially all of its natural gas transmission, storage and gathering services under contracts with long-term, firm reservation and/or usage fees. This contract structure enhances the stability of the Partnership's cash flows and limits its direct exposure to commodity price risk. For the year ended December 31, 2014, approximately 61% of the Partnership's revenues were generated from capacity reservation charges under long-term firm contracts, which have a weighted average remaining term of approximately 17 years for transmission and storage contracts, and approximately 10 years for firm gathering contracts as of December 31, 2014. The Partnership’s operations are primarily focused in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia, a strategic location in the core of the rapidly developing natural gas shale play known as the Marcellus Shale. This same region is also the core operating area of EQT, the Partnership's largest customer. EQT accounted for approximately 62% of the Partnership's revenues generated for the year ended December 31, 2014. The PartnershipEQM provides midstream services to EQT and multiple third parties across 2122 counties in Pennsylvania and West Virginia through its two primary assets: the transmission and storage system, which serves as a header system transmission pipeline, and the gathering system, which delivers natural gas from wells and other receipt points to transmission pipelines. The PartnershipEQM provides substantially all of its natural gas transmission, storage and gathering services under contracts with long-term, firm reservation and/or usage fees. This contract structure enhances the stability of EQM's cash flows and limits its direct exposure to commodity price risk. For the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 82% of EQM's revenues were generated from capacity reservation charges under long-term firm contracts. Including contracts on the Allegheny Valley Connector (AVC) facilities and contracts associated with expected future capacity from expansion projects that are not yet fully constructed but for which EQM has entered into firm contracts, firm transmission and storage contracts have a weighted average remaining term of approximately 17 years and firm gathering contracts have a weighted average remaining term of approximately 9 years as of December 31, 2015, in each case based on total projected contracted revenues. EQM’s operations are primarily focused in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia, a strategic location in the core of the natural gas shale plays known as the Marcellus and Utica Shales. This same region is also the core operating area of EQT, EQM's largest customer. EQT accounted for approximately 73% of EQM's revenues generated for the year ended December 31, 2015. EQM believes that its strategically located assets, combined with its working relationship with EQT, position it as a leading Appalachian Basin midstream energy company.
 
EQT is one of the largest natural gas producers in the Appalachian Basin. As of December 31, 2014,2015, EQT reported 10.710.0 Tcfe of proved natural gas, natural gas liquids and crude oil reserves and, for the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, EQT reported total production sales volumes of 476603 Bcfe, representing a 26%27% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2014. Since 2010,2011, EQT has successfully grown production by 254% for202% through the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, primarily driven by production from the Marcellus Shale, while increasing proved reserves 106% over the same time period.Shale. EQT has announced that estimated sales volumes in 20152016 are expected to be 575700 to 600720 Bcfe, an increase of approximately 23%18% over 2014.2015. EQT has also announced a 20152016 capital expenditure forecast of $1.85 billion$820 million for well development, (excluding land acquisitions), which will be primarily focused in the Marcellus Shale. In order to facilitate production growth in its areas of operation, EQT invested approximately $1.6 billion in midstream infrastructure from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014. The Partnershipand Utica Shales. EQM believes its economic relationship with EQT incentivizes EQT to provide the PartnershipEQM with access to production growth in and around the Partnership'sEQM's existing assets and with acquisitionsorganic growth and organic growthacquisition opportunities, although EQT is under no obligation to make such opportunities available to the Partnership.EQM.
 
20142015 Highlights

During 2015, EQM completed the following acquisitions:

NWV Gathering Acquisition. On May 7, 2014, the Partnership acquired Jupiter from EQT.March 17, 2015, EQT contributed NWV Gathering to EQM Gathering. EQM paid total consideration of $925.7 million to EQT, consisting of approximately $873.2 million in cash, 511,973 EQM common units and 178,816 EQM general partner units. As of December 31, 2014, this system consists2015, NWV Gathering consisted of an approximately 45-mile85 miles of high pressure natural gas gathering system located in Greenepipeline and Washington counties, Pennsylvania11 compressor units with three compressor stations, which have approximately 575 MMcf per day34,500 horsepower of compression capacity. Jupiter has six interconnectsand a wet gas header pipeline, which is an approximately 30-mile high pressure pipeline that receives wet gas from development areas in northern West Virginia and provides delivery to the MarkWest Mobley processing facility. The NWV Gathering assets also interconnect with the Partnership’sEQM's transmission and storage system and a totalhad firm gathering capacity of 970approximately 560 MMcf per day as of interconnect capacity. The aggregate consideration paid by the Partnership to EQT for Jupiter was approximately $1,180 million, consisting of a $1,121 million cash payment, 516,050 common units of the Partnership and 262,828 general partner units of the Partnership.December 31, 2015.


76

Table of Contents

MVP Interest Acquisition. On March 30, 2015, EQM assumed 100% of the membership interests in MVP Holdco, LLC (MVP Holdco), the owner of the interest (the MVP Interest) in Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (MVP Joint Venture), which at the time was an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT. EQM paid EQT approximately $54.2 million which was equal to 100% of the capital contributions made by EQT to the MVP Joint Venture as of March 30, 2015. During 2015, ownership interests totaling 11% in the MVP Joint Venture were sold for reimbursement of capital contributions. In January 2016, EQM sold 8.5% of its ownership interest in the MVP Joint Venture for reimbursement of $12.5 million of capital contributions. The counterparty to this sale has the right to terminate its purchase of the interest in the MVP Joint Venture and be reimbursed for the purchase price and all capital contributions it makes to the MVP Joint Venture for a period ending no later than December 31, 2016.As of February 11, 2016, EQM owned a 45.5% interest in the MVP Joint Venture. See further discussion of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) project in the Transmission and Storage System discussion.

Additionally on May 7, 2014,
Preferred Interest Acquisition. On April 15, 2015, pursuant to the PartnershipNWV Gathering Acquisition contribution and sale agreement, EQM acquired a preferred interest (the Preferred Interest) in EQT Energy Supply, LLC (EES), which at the time was an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT, from EQT for approximately $124.3 million. EES generates revenue from services provided to a local distribution company.

Also during 2015, EQM completed the following capital market transactions:

March Offering. On March 17, 2015, EQM completed an underwritten public offering of 12,362,5008,250,000 common units. The PartnershipOn March 18, 2015, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase 1,237,500 additional common units on the same terms as the offering. EQM received net proceeds of approximately $902$696.6 million after deducting the underwriters' discount and offering expenses. EQM used the net proceeds from the offering after deducting the underwriters’ discount and offering expenses, which were usedborrowings under EQM's credit facility to payfinance the cash portion ofconsideration paid to EQT in connection with the Jupiter Acquisition consideration.NWV Gathering Acquisition.

ATM Offerings. During the third quarter of 2014,2015, EQM entered into an equity distribution agreement that established an At the PartnershipMarket common unit offering program, pursuant to which a group of managers, acting as EQM's sales agents, may sell EQM common units having an aggregate offering price of up to $750 million (the $750 million ATM Program). During the third and fourth quarters of 2015, EQM issued $500 million1,162,475 common units at an average price per unit of 4.00% Senior Notes (4.00% Senior Notes) due in 2024. Net$74.92. EQM received net proceeds of the offering of approximately $492$85.5 million which were used to repay the outstanding borrowings under the Partnership’s credit facility and for general partnership purposes.

November Offering. On November 16, 2015, EQM completed an underwritten public offering of 5,650,000 common units. EQM received net proceeds of $399.9 million after deducting the underwriters' discount and offering expenses. The net proceeds will be used for general partnership purposes, including to fund a portion of EQM's anticipated 2016 capital expenditures related to transmission and gathering expansion projects and to repay amounts outstanding under EQM's credit facility.

Properties

The following table provides information regarding the transmission and storage and gathering systems as of December 31, 2014,2015, including the Allegheny Valley Connector (AVC)AVC facilities that the PartnershipEQM leases from EQT:
System Approximate
Number of
Miles
 Approximate
Number of
Receipt Points
 Approximate
Compression
(Horsepower)
 Approximate
Number of
Miles
 Approximate
Number of
Receipt Points
 Approximate
Compression
(Horsepower)
Transmission and storage 700 80 69,000 700 80 69,000
AVC (leased transmission and storage) 200 60 13,000 200 70 13,000
Gathering 1,545 2,400 73,000 1,685 2,300 127,000

Transmission and Storage System
 
As of December 31, 2014, the Partnership’s2015, EQM’s transmission and storage system included an approximately 700 mile700-mile FERC-regulated interstate pipeline regulated by the FERC that connects to five interstate pipelines and multiple distribution companies. The transmission system is supported by 14 associated natural gas storage reservoirs with approximately 400 MMcf per day of peak withdrawal capability,capacity, 32 Bcf of working gas capacity and 27 compressor units, with total throughput capacity of approximately 3.03.1 Bcf per day as of December 31, 2014.2015. Through a lease with EQT, the PartnershipEQM also operates the AVC facilities, which include an

7

Table of Contents

approximately 200-mile FERC-regulated interstate pipeline that interconnects with the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage system insystem. As of December 31, 2015, the Marcellus Shale region. The AVC facilities provideprovided 0.45 Bcf per day of additional firm capacity to the Partnership’sEQM’s system and are supported by four associated natural gas storage reservoirs with approximately 260 MMcf per day of peak withdrawal capability, 15capacity, approximately 11 Bcf of working gas capacity and 11 compressor units, as of December 31, 2014. Of the total 15 Bcf of working gas capacity, the Partnership leases 13 Bcf.units. Revenues associated with the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage system, including those on AVC, represented approximately 65%48%, 57%53% and 60%49% of its total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the weighted average remaining contract life based on total projected contracted revenues for2015, firm transmission and storage contracts, including those on the AVC wasfacilities and contracts associated with expected future capacity from expansion projects that are not yet fully constructed but for which EQM has entered into firm contracts, have a weighted average remaining term of approximately 17 years.years based on total projected contracted revenues.
 
The Partnership has completed, and continues to work on, numerousIn the ordinary course of its business, EQM pursues transmission projects aimed at profitably increasing system capacity. In 2014, the Partnership completed the following transmission projects:
Jefferson Compressor Station Expansion Project. The Jefferson compressor station expansion project added approximately 550 MMcf per day of incremental capacity to the Partnership's transmission system at a cost of approximately $30 million. The expansion was placed into service in September 2014.

Antero and Range Projects. The Partnershipsecond quarter 2015, EQM completed a project for Antero Resources in the fourth quarter of 2014Corporation (Antero) that added approximately 100 MMcf per day of capacity to the Partnership'sEQM's transmission system at a cost of approximately $16$25 million. The Partnership also completed a project for Range Resources in the fourth quarter of 2014; this project added approximately 100 MMcf per day of capacity to the Partnership's transmission system at a cost of approximately $15 million.

In 2015, the Partnership2016, EQM will focus on the following transmission projects:

Antero Project. The Partnership expects to invest approximately $25 million to complete a second Antero project, which will add 100 MMcf per day of transmission capacity. The project is expected to be in service by mid-2015.

Ohio Valley Connector. The Ohio Valley Connector (OVC) includesis a 36-mile37-mile pipeline that will extend the Partnership'sEQM's transmission and storage system from northern West Virginia to Clarington, Ohio, at which point it will interconnect with the Rockies Express Pipeline and the Texas Eastern Pipeline. In December 2014, the Partnership submitted the OVC certificate application, which also includes related Equitrans transmission

8

Table of Contents

expansion projects, to the FERCmay interconnect with other pipelines and anticipates receiving the certificate in the second half of 2015. Subject to FERC approval, construction is scheduled to begin in the third quarter of 2015 and the pipeline is expected to be in-service by mid-year 2016.liquidity points. The OVC will provide approximately 850 BBtu per day of transmission capacity with an aggregate compression of approximately 38,000 horsepower and the 36-mile pipeline portion is estimated to cost approximately $300$350 million to $380 million, of which $120$210 million to $130$220 million is expected to be spent in 2015. The Partnership2016. EQT has entered into a 20-year precedent agreement with EQM for a total of 650 BBtu per day of firm transmission capacity on the OVC. EQM received its FERC certificate to construct and operate the OVC on December 30, 2015 and construction began in January 2016. EQM expects the OVC to be in-service by year-end 2016.

Equitrans Transmission Expansion Projects. In conjunction with the OVC and other projects, the Partnership also plans to beginEQM is evaluating several multi-year transmission capacity expansion projects to support the continuedproduction growth ofin the Marcellus and Utica development. The projects include pipeline looping, compression installation and new pipeline segments, which combined are expected to increase transmission capacity by approximately 1.0Shales that could total an additional 1.5 Bcf per day of capacity by year-end 2017.2018. The Partnershipprojects may include additional compression, pipeline looping and new header pipelines. EQM expects to invest a total of approximately $400 million, of whichspend approximately $25 million is expected to be spenton these expansion projects during 2015.2016.

Mountain Valley Pipeline. In 2015, the Partnership expects to assume EQT's interest in Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC,The MVP Joint Venture is a joint venture with an affiliateaffiliates of each of NextEra Energy, Inc., Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ConEd), WGL Holdings, Inc.,Vega Energy Partners, Ltd. and RGC Resources, Inc. As of February 11, 2016, EQM owned a 45.5% interest in the MVP Joint Venture and had assumed the role of operator of the MVP to be constructed by the joint venture. The estimated 300-mile Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP)MVP is currently targeted at 42 inches in diameter and a capacity of 2.0 Bcf per day, and will extend from the Partnership'sEQM's existing transmission and storage system in Wetzel County, West Virginia to Pittsylvania County, Virginia. The Partnership expects to ownAs currently designed, the largest interest in the joint venture and will operate the MVP. The MVP is estimated to cost a total of $2.5$3.0 billion to $3.5 billion, excluding AFUDC, with the PartnershipEQM funding its proportionate share through capital contributions made to the joint venture. In 2015, the Partnership's2016, EQM expects to provide capital contributions are expected to beof approximately $75$150 million to $85 million and will bethe MVP Joint Venture, primarily in support of material orders, environmental and land assessments and engineering design work and materials.work. Expenditures are expected to increase substantially as construction commences, with the bulk of the expenditures expected to be made in 2017 and 2018. On January 21, 2016, affiliates of ConEd acquired a 12.5% interest in the MVP Joint Venture and entered into 20-year firm capacity commitments for approximately 0.25 Bcf per day on both the MVP and EQM’s transmission system. ConEd has the right to terminate its purchase of the interest in the MVP Joint Venture and be reimbursed for the purchase price and all capital contributions it makes to the MVP Joint Venture for a period ending no later than December 31, 2016. The joint ventureMVP Joint Venture has secured a total of 2.0 Bcf per day of 20-year firm capacity commitments, at 20-year termsincluding a 1.29 Bcf per day firm capacity commitment by EQT, and is currently in negotiation with additional shippers who have expressed interest in the MVP project. As a result,The MVP Joint Venture submitted the final project scope, including pipe diameter and total capacity, has not yet been determined; however, the voluntary pre-filing process withMVP certificate application to the FERC began in October 2014. The pipeline, which is subject2015 and anticipates receiving the certificate in the fourth quarter of 2016. Subject to FERC approval, construction is scheduled to begin shortly thereafter and the pipeline is expected to be in-service during the fourth quarter of 2018.

The PartnershipEQM generally provides transmission and storage services in two manners: firm service and interruptible service. The fixed monthly fee under a firm contract is referred to as a monthlycapacity reservation charge.fee, which is recognized ratably over the contract period based on the contracted volume regardless of the amount of natural gas that is transported or stored. In addition to monthlycapacity reservation charges, the Partnershipfees, EQM may also collect usage chargesfees when a firm transmission customer uses the capacity it has reserved under these firm transmission contracts. Where applicable, these chargesthe usage fees are assessed on the actual volume of natural gas transported on the transmission system. A firm transmission customer is billed an additional usage chargefee on volumes in excess of firm capacity when the

8

Table of Contents

level of natural gas received for delivery from the customer exceeds its reserved capacity. Customers are not assured capacity or service for volumes in excess of firm capacity on the applicable pipeline as these volumes have the same priority as interruptible service. A significant portion of the Partnership’s transportation and storage services are provided through firm service agreements.

 Firm storage contracts obligate customers to pay a fixed monthly charge for the firm right to inject, withdraw and store a specified volume of natural gas regardless of the amount of storage capacity actually utilized by the customer. Firm storage customers are generally assessed usage charges on the actual quantities of natural gas injected into or withdrawn from storage. A firm storage customer is also billed a usage charge on volumes in excess of firm capacity when the level of gas injected or withdrawn exceeds the customer’s maximum daily injection or withdrawal limit.
Under interruptible service contracts, customers pay usage fees based on their actual utilization of assets for transmission and storage services.assets. Customers that have executed interruptible contracts are not assured capacity or service on the applicable pipeline and storage facilities.systems. To the extent that physical capacity that is contracted for firm service is not being fully utilized or there is excess capacity that has not been contracted for service exists, the system can allocate such capacity to interruptible services. The Partnership also provides natural gas “park and loan” services to assist customers in managing gas surpluses or deficits.
The Partnership generally does not take title to the natural gas transported or stored for its customers.

Including AVC and expected future capacity from expansion projects that are not yet fully constructed but for which the PartnershipEQM has entered into firm transportation and storage agreements,contracts, approximately 3.74.7 Bcf per day of transmission capacity and 31.930.4 Bcf of storage capacity, respectively, were subscribed under firm transmission and storage contracts as of December 31, 2014. These contracts have a weighted average remaining contract life, based on total projected contracted revenues, of approximately 16 years for transmission contracts and 19 years for storage contracts.2015.

9

Table of Contents

 
As of December 31, 2014,2015, approximately 87%90% of the Partnership'sEQM's contracted transmission firm capacity was subscribed by customers under negotiated rate agreements under its tariff. The remaining 13%10% of the Partnership’sEQM’s contracted transmission firm capacity was subscribed at the recourse rates under its tariff, (i.e.,which are the maximum rates an interstate pipeline may charge for its services under its tariff).tariff. EQM generally does not take title to the natural gas transported or stored for its customers.

The PartnershipEQM has an acreage dedication from EQT pursuant to which the PartnershipEQM has the right to elect to transport on its transmission and storage system all natural gas produced from wells drilled by EQT under an area covering approximately 60,000 acres in Allegheny, Washington and Greene counties in Pennsylvania and Wetzel, Marion, Taylor, Tyler, Doddridge, Harrison and Lewis counties in West Virginia. EQT has a significant natural gas drilling program in these areas.

Transmission and Storage System

9

Table of Contents

         
Gathering System
 

The Partnership’sAs of December 31, 2015, EQM’s gathering system consists ofincluded approximately 45185 miles of high-pressurehigh pressure gathering lines associated primarily with Jupiter, which have six interconnectsapproximately 1.4 Bcf of total firm gathering capacity and multiple interconnect points with the Partnership’sEQM's transmission and storage system. EQM's gathering system as well as approximatelyalso included 1,500 miles of FERC-regulated low-pressurelow pressure gathering lines that have multiple delivery interconnects with the Partnership's transmission and storage system.lines. Gathering revenues represented approximately 35%52%, 43%47% and 40%51% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The Partnership has a gas gathering agreement for gathering services on Jupiter (Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement) which commenced on May 1,2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Including contracts associated with expected future capacity from expansion projects that are not yet fully constructed but for which EQM has a 10-year term (with year-to-year rollovers). Underentered into firm gathering contracts, the Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement,weighted average remaining contract life based on total projected contracted revenues for firm gathering contracts was approximately 225 MMcf per day9 years as of firm compression capacity was subscribed, which was the available capacity on Jupiter at that time. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Partnership placed one compressor station in service and added

10

Table of Contents

compression at the two existing compressor stations in Greene County, Pennsylvania. In total, this expansion added approximately 350 MMcf per day of compression capacity and cost approximately $71 million. The firm capacity subscribed under the Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement increased by 200 MMcf per day effective December 1, 2014 and by an additional 150 MMcf per day effective January 1,31, 2015.

DuringIn the ordinary course of its business, EQM pursues profitable gathering expansion projects for affiliates and third party producers. In 2015, EQM completed the Partnership intendsfollowing gathering projects: 

Jupiter Development Area. EQM spent approximately $75 million in 2015 related to complete an additional expansion in the Jupiter development area primarily located in Greene and Washington counties of Jupiter. This expansion involves the construction of two additional compressor stations and approximately 30 miles of pipe, which will bringPennsylvania that raised total Jupiter compressionfirm gathering capacity in that area to 775 MMcf per day, by the year-end 2015. The Partnership expects Jupiter-related capital expenditures ofwhich is fully subscribed.

NWV Gathering Development Area. EQM spent approximately $100$74 million in 2015. The Jupiter Gas2015 related to expansion in the NWV Gathering Agreement provides for separate 10-year terms (with year-to-year rollovers) for the compressiondevelopment area primarily located in Doddridge and Wetzel counties of West Virginia that raised total firm gathering capacity associated with each expansion project. After the expansion projects scheduledin that area to be completed560 MMcf per day as of December 31, 2015, which is fully subscribed.

Third Party Projects. EQM spent approximately $30 million in 2015 have been placed into service, EQT’s firm reservation fee is expectedrelated to result in revenue to the Partnership of approximately $173 million annually. EQT also agreed to pay a monthly usage fee for volumes gathered in excess of firm compression capacity.

In 2015, the Partnership will also invest approximately $40 million in gathering infrastructure for third-party producers. This gathering infrastructure willto support third party producers, primarily supportserving Range Resources'Resources Corporation's (Range Resources) production development in eastern Washington County, Pennsylvania under an agreement signed in 2014.

In 2016, EQM will focus on the following gathering expansion projects:

Range Resources Header Pipeline Project. In July 2015, EQM announced its agreement with a subsidiary of Range Resources to construct a natural gas header pipeline in southwestern Pennsylvania to support Marcellus and Utica development. The pipeline is expected to cost approximately $250 million and is contracted to provide 550 MMcf per day of firm capacity backed by a ten-year firm capacity reservation commitment. EQM plans to complete the project in two phases, with phase one expected to be in-service during the second half of 2016 and phase two during the first half of 2017. EQM expects to invest approximately $195 million to $205 million on the project in 2016.

NWV Gathering and Jupiter Development Areas. EQM expects to invest a total of approximately $370 million, of which approximately $95 million to $105 million is expected to be spent during 2016, related to expansion in the NWV Gathering development area. These expenditures are part of a fully subscribed expansion project expected to raise total firm gathering capacity in the NWV Gathering development area to 640 MMcf per day by mid-year 2017. EQM also plans to invest approximately $20 million in the Jupiter development area to install gathering pipeline that will extend the gathering system to include additional EQT Production development areas in Greene County, Pennsylvania.

EQM has various firm gas gathering agreements which provide for firm reservation fees in certain high pressure development areas. Including expected future capacity from expansion projects that are not yet fully constructed but for which EQM had entered into firm gathering agreements, approximately 2.1 Bcf per day of firm gathering capacity was subscribed under firm gathering contracts as of December 31, 2015.

On the Partnership’sEQM’s low pressure regulated gathering system, the primary term of a typical gathering agreement is one year with month-to-month roll over provisions terminable upon at least 30 days notice. The rates for gathering service on the regulated system are based on the maximum posted tariff rate and assessed on actual receipts into the gathering system. The PartnershipEQM also retains a percentage of wellhead natural gas receipts to recover natural gas used to run its compressor stations and other requirements on all of its gathering systems.


10

Table of Contents

Gathering System
  
The following table provides a revenue breakdown by EQM business segment for the year ended December 31, 2015:
  Revenue Composition %
  Firm Contracts  Interruptible Contracts  
  
Capacity
Reservation
  Usage Usage  
  Charges Charges  Fees Total
Transmission and storage 40% 7% 1% 48%
Gathering 42% 5% 5% 52%

Approximately 82% of total revenues are derived from firm reservation fees. As a result, EQM believes that short and medium term declines in volumes of gas produced, gathered, transported or stored on its systems will not have a significant impact on its results of operations, liquidity, financial position or ability to pay distributions because these firm reservation fees are paid regardless of volumes supplied to the system by customers. Longer term price declines could have an impact on customer creditworthiness and related ability to pay firm reservation fees under long-term contracts which could impact EQM's results of operations, liquidity, financial position or ability to pay distributions. Additionally, long term declines in gas production in EQM's areas of operations will limit EQM's growth potential.


11

Table of Contents

The following table provides a revenue breakdown by business segment for the year ended December 31, 2014:
  Revenue Composition %
  Firm Contracts    
  
Capacity
Reservation
  Usage 
Interruptible
Contracts
  
  Charges Charges Usage Charges Total
Transmission and Storage 51% 11% 3% 65%
Gathering 10% 11% 14% 35%

Strategy
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s principal business objective is to increase the quarterly cash distributions that it pays to its unitholders over time while ensuring the ongoing stability of its business. The PartnershipEQM expects to achieve thisits principal business objective through the following business strategies:
 
Capitalizing on economically attractive organic growth opportunities. The PartnershipEQM believes that organic projects will be a key driver of growth in the future. The PartnershipEQM expects to grow its systems over time by meeting EQT’s and other third party customers’ midstream service needs that result from their drilling activity in the Partnership’sEQM’s areas of operations. EQT’s acreage dedication to the Partnership’sEQM’s assets and EQT’s economic relationship with the PartnershipEQM provide a platform for organic growth. In addition, the PartnershipEQM intends to leverage EQT’s knowledge of, and expertise in, the Marcellus Shale in order to target and efficiently execute economically attractive organic growth projects for third party customers, although EQT is under no obligation to share such knowledge and expertise with the Partnership. The PartnershipEQM. EQM will evaluate organic expansion and greenfield construction opportunities in existing and new markets that it believes will increase the volume of transmission, storage and gathering capacity subscribed on its systems. As production increases in the Partnership'sEQM's areas of operations, the PartnershipEQM believes that it will have a competitive advantage in pursuing economically attractive organic expansion projects.

Increasing access to existing and new delivery markets.  The PartnershipEQM is actively working to increase delivery interconnects with interstate pipelines, neighboring LDCs, large industrial facilities and electric generation plants in order to increase access to existing and new markets for natural gas consumption. In 2015, the Partnership expects to beginEQM began several multi-year transmission expansion projects to support the continued growth of Marcellus and Utica Shale development, including the MVP, the OVC and Equitransother transmission expansion projects. Upon completion of the OVC and the Equitrans transmission expansion projects, EquitransEQM's transmission capacity is expected to exceed 4.8approximate 5.0 Bcf per day by year-end 2017.2018. Additionally, the MVP is expected to have at least 2.0 Bcf per day of capacity when it is complete.

Pursuing accretive acquisitions from EQT and third partiesThe PartnershipEQM intends to seek opportunities to expand its existing natural gas transmission, storage and gathering operations through accretive acquisitions from EQT and third parties, though EQT is under no obligation to offer acquisition opportunities to the Partnership.EQM. These opportunities may include EQT’s retained transmission assets, which consist of the AVC facilities, and EQT’s retained high pressure gathering assets which include approximately 6,600 miles of gathering pipelines with throughput of approximately 875 MMcf of natural gas per day as of December 31, 2014. These retained gathering assets include approximately 120 miles of high-pressureincluding gathering lines serving both liquids-rich and dry gas areas in the Marcellus Shale located in Armstrong, Allegheny, Clearfield, Jefferson and Tioga counties in Pennsylvania and Doddridge, Taylor, Ritchie and Wetzel counties in West Virginia. The PartnershipShale. EQM will also evaluate and may pursue acquisition opportunities from third parties as they become available.

Attracting additional third-partythird party volumes.  The PartnershipEQM actively markets its midstream services to, and pursues strategic relationships with, third-partythird party producers in order to attract additional volumes and/or expansion opportunities. The PartnershipEQM believes that its connectivity to interstate pipelines, which is a key feature of a header system transmission pipeline, as well as its position as an early developer of midstream infrastructure within certain areas of the Marcellus Shale and the Utica Shale,Shales, will allow the PartnershipEQM to capture additional third-partythird party volumes in the future. The PartnershipEQM anticipates that organic growth projects that it pursues for EQT, or any assets it acquires from EQT, generally will be constructed in a manner that leverages economies of scale to allow for incremental third party volumes in excess of capacity amounts needed by EQT.

Focusing on stable, fixed-fee business.  The PartnershipEQM intends to pursue additional opportunities to provide fixed-fee transmission, storage and gathering services to EQT and third parties. This contract structure enhances

12

Table of Contents

the stability of the Partnership’sEQM’s cash flows and limits its direct exposure to commodity price risk. The PartnershipEQM will focus on obtaining additional long-term firm commitments from customers, which may include reservation-based charges,fees, volume commitments and acreage dedications.

The Partnership’sEQM’s Relationship with EQT
 
One of the Partnership’sEQM’s principal attributes is its relationship with EQT. Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in the heart of the Appalachian Basin, EQT is an integrated energy company, with an emphasis on natural gas production, gathering and transmission. EQT conducts its business through two business segments: EQT Production and EQT Midstream. EQT Production is one of the largest natural gas producers in the Appalachian Basin with 10.710.0 Tcfe of proved natural gas, natural gas liquids and crude oil reserves across approximately 3.4 million gross acres as of December 31, 2014,2015, of which approximately 630,000 gross acres were located in the Marcellus Shale. EQT Midstream provides transmission, storage and gathering services for EQT’s produced gas and to third parties in the Appalachian Basin.
 


12

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2015, EQT ownsGP Holdings, LP (NYSE: EQGP) (EQGP) and its subsidiaries owned a 2.0%1.8% general partner interest in the Partnership,EQM, all of the Partnership’sEQM’s incentive distribution rights and a 34.4%27.6% limited partner interest in EQM. As of December 31, 2015, EQT owned 100% of the Partnership.non-economic general partner interest and a 90.1% limited partner interest in EQGP. Because of its ownership of the incentive distribution rights,significant interest in EQM that EQT owns through EQGP, EQT is positioned to directly benefit from committing additional natural gas volumes to the Partnership’sEQM’s systems and from facilitating organic growth opportunities and accretive acquisitions and organic growth opportunities.for EQM. However, EQT is under no obligation to make acquisition opportunities available to the Partnership,EQM, is not restricted from competing with the PartnershipEQM and may acquire, construct or dispose of midstream assets without any obligation to offer the PartnershipEQM the opportunity to purchase or construct these assets.
 
The PartnershipEQM believes that its relationship with EQT is advantageous for the following reasons:
 
EQT is a leader among exploration and production companies in the Appalachian Basin.  A substantial portion of EQT’s drilling efforts in recent years were focused on drilling horizontal wells in the Marcellus Shale formations of southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia. For the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, EQT reported total production sales volumes of 476603 Bcfe, representing a 26%27% increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2014. Approximately 79%84% of EQT’s total production in 20142015 was from wells in the Marcellus Shale. EQTEQT's Marcellus sales volumes were 38%34% higher for the year ended December 31, 20142015 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2014.
 
EQT has a portfolio of retained certain midstream assets. The PartnershipEQM expects to have the opportunity to purchase additional midstream assets from EQT in the future, although EQT is under no obligation to make the opportunities available to the Partnership.EQM. The opportunities are expected to include:include the retained transmission and gathering assets previously described.
 
Retained transmission assets. The AVC facilities as previously described.

Retained gathering assets. The retained gathering assets as previously described.

EQT production growth supports the Partnership'sEQM's development of organic expansion projects. EQT continues to expand its exploration and production operations in the Appalachian Basin, primarily in the Marcellus Shale.and Utica Shales. As this expansion increases into areas that are currently underserved by midstream infrastructure, the PartnershipEQM expects it will have a competitive advantage in pursuing economically attractive organic expansion projects, which the PartnershipEQM believes will be a key driver of growth in the future.

While the Partnership’sEQM’s relationship with EQT may provide significant benefits, it may also become a source of potential conflicts. For example, EQT is not restricted from competing with the Partnership.EQM. In addition, all of the executive officers and a majority of the directors of EQT Midstream Services, LLC, the Partnership’s general partner of EQM (the EQM General Partner) also serve as officers and in one case as a director of EQT, and these individuals face conflicts of interest, which include the allocation of their time between the PartnershipEQM and EQT. For a description of the Partnership’sEQM’s relationships with EQT, please read Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”
 
 Markets and Customers
 
Reclassifying Equitable Gas Company, LLC (Equitable Gas Company) 2013 revenues as discussed below to third party revenues indue to EQT's 2013 and 2012,sale of Equitable Gas Company, EQT accounted for approximately 62%73%, 73%69% and 66%77% of the Partnership’sEQM’s total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively. InFor the year ended December 31, 2013, EQT completed the sale of its LDC subsidiary, Equitable Gas Company LLC (Equitable Gas Company) to PNG Companies LLC. As a result, revenues from Equitable Gas Company were reported as third party revenues in 2014. accounted for approximately 11% of EQM’s total revenues.

For the years ended December 31, 20132015 and 2012, Equitable Gas Company accounted for

13

Table of Contents

approximately 13%2014, PNG Companies, LLC and 18%, respectively, of the Partnership’s total revenues. These were reported as affiliate revenues for the respective years.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, Peoples Natural Gas Company, LLCits affiliates accounted for approximately 20%14% and 16% of the Partnership'sEQM's total revenues.revenues, respectively. Other than EQT, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Partnership'sEQM's total revenues in 2013 or 2012.2013.

Transmission and Storage Customers
 
The PartnershipEQM provides natural gas transmission services for EQT and third parties, predominantly consisting of LDCs, marketers, producers and commercial and industrial users that the PartnershipEQM believes to be creditworthy. The Partnership’sEQM’s transmission system serves not only adjacent markets in Pennsylvania and West Virginia but also provides its customers with access to high-demand end-user markets in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern United States through 3.3 Bcf per day of delivery interconnect capacity with major interstate pipelines. The PartnershipEQM provides storage services to a mix of customers, including marketers and LDCs.
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s primary transportationtransmission and storage customer is EQT. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, EQT and its affiliates, including Equitable Gas Company for the year ended December 31, 2013, accounted for approximately 51%48%, 80%46% and 81%78%, respectively, of EQM's transmission revenues and 2%, 61% and 68%, respectively, of storage revenues. Additionally, for the yearyears ended December 31,

13

Table of Contents

2015 and 2014, Peoples Natural Gas Company, LLC accounted for approximately 29% and 30% of the Partnership'sEQM's transmission and storage revenues. Other than EQT, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of totalEQM's transmission and storage revenuerevenues in 2013 or 2012.2013.
 
Gathering Customers
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s gathering system has approximately 2,4002,300 receipt points with a number of natural gas producers. EQT represented approximately 91%97%, 96% and 97% of EQM's gathering revenues for the 743 BBtu per day of gathered volumes inyears ended December 31, 2015, 2014 approximately 96% of the 629 BBtu per day of gathered volumes inand 2013, and approximately 92% of the 339 BBtu per day of gathered volumes in 2012.respectively.

Competition
 
Competition for natural gas transmission and storage volumes is primarily based on rates, customer commitment levels, timing, performance, commercial terms, reliability, service levels, location, reputation and fuel efficiencies. The Partnership’sEQM’s principal competitors in its natural gas transmission and storage market include companies that own major natural gas pipelines. In addition, the PartnershipEQM competes with companies that are building high pressure gathering facilities that are not subject to FERC jurisdiction to move volumes to interstate pipelines. EQT also owns, and in the future may construct, natural gas transmission pipelines and high-pressurehigh pressure gathering facilities. Major pipeline natural gas transmission companies that compete with the PartnershipEQM also have existing storage facilities connected to their transmission systems that compete with certain of the Partnership’sEQM’s storage facilities. Pending and future third-partythird party construction projects, if and when brought on-line, may also compete with the Partnership’sEQM’s natural gas transmission and storage services. These third-partythird party projects may include FERC-certificated expansions and greenfield construction projects.

Key competitors for new gathering systems include companies that own major natural gas pipelines, independent gas gatherers and integrated energy companies. Many of the Partnership’sEQM’s competitors have capital resources and control supplies of natural gas greater than it does.

Regulatory Environment
 
FERC Regulation
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s interstate natural gas transportationtransmission and storage operations are regulated by the FERC under the NGA, the NGPA and the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The Partnership’sEQM’s regulated system operates under a tariff approved by the FERC that establishes rates, cost recovery mechanisms and the terms and conditions of service to its customers. Generally, the FERC’s authority extends to:
 
                  rates and charges for natural gas transmission, storage and certainFERC-regulated gathering services;
                  certification and construction of new interstate transportationtransmission and storage facilities;
                   extension or abandonment of interstate transportationtransmission and storage services and facilities;
                  maintenance of accounts and records;
                  relationships between pipelines and certain affiliates;
                  terms and conditions of services and service contracts with customers;

14

Table of Contents

                  depreciation and amortization policies;
                  acquisition and disposition of interstate transportationtransmission and storage facilities; and
                  initiation and discontinuation of interstate transportationtransmission and storage services.
 
The PartnershipEQM holds certificates of public convenience and necessity for its transmission and storage system issued by the FERC pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA covering rates, facilities, activities and services. These certificates require the PartnershipEQM to provide open-access services on its interstate pipeline and storage facilities on a non-discriminatory basis to all customers that qualify under the FERC gas tariff. In addition, under Section 8 of the NGA, the FERC has the power to prescribe the accounting treatment of certain items for regulatory purposes. Thus, the books and records of the Partnership’sEQM’s interstate pipeline and storage facilities may be periodically audited by the FERC.
 
The FERC regulates the rates and charges for transportationtransmission and storage in interstate commerce. Under the NGA, rates charged by interstate pipelines must be just and reasonable. The FERC’s cost-of-service regulations generally limit the recourse rates for transportationtransmission and storage services to the cost of providing service plus a reasonable rate of return. In each rate case, the FERC must approve service costs, the allocation of costs, the allowed rate of return on capital investment, rate design and other rate factors. A negative determination on any of these rate factors could adversely affect the Partnership’sEQM’s business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make distributions.distributions to its unitholders.
 

14

Table of Contents

The recourse rate that the PartnershipEQM may charge for its services is established through the FERC’s ratemaking process. Generally, the maximum filed recourse rates for interstate pipelines are based on the cost of providing that service including recovery of and a return on the pipeline’s actual prudent historical cost of investment. Key determinants in the ratemaking process include the depreciated capital costs of the facilities, the costs of providing service, the allowed rate of return and certain taxes, as well as volume throughput and contractual capacity commitment assumptions. The maximum applicable recourse rates and terms and conditions for service are set forth in the pipeline’s FERC approvedFERC-approved tariff. Rate design and the allocation of costs also can impact a pipeline’s profitability. While the ratemaking process establishes the maximum rate that can be charged, interstate pipelines such as the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage system are permitted to discount their firm and interruptible rates without further FERC authorization down to the variable cost of performing service, provided they do not “unduly discriminate.” In addition, pipelines are allowed to negotiate different rates with their customers, as described below.
 
Pursuant to the NGA, changes to rates or terms and conditions of service can be proposed by a pipeline company under Section 4, or the existing interstate transportationtransmission and storage rates or terms and conditions of service may be challenged by a complaint filed by interested persons including customers, state agencies or the FERC under Section 5. Rate increases proposed by a pipeline may be allowed to become effective subject to refund, while rates or terms and conditions of service which are the subject of a complaint under Section 5 are subject to prospective change by the FERC. Rate increases proposed by a regulated interstate pipeline may be challenged and such increases may ultimately be rejected by the FERC. Any successful challenge against existing or proposed rates charged for the Partnership’s transportationEQM’s transmission and storage services could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make distributions.distributions to its unitholders.
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s interstate pipeline may also use negotiated rates which could involve rates above or below the recourse rate or rates that are subject to a different rate structure than the rates specified in EQM's interstate pipeline tariffs, provided that the affected customers are willing to agree to such rates and that the FERC has approved the negotiated rate agreement. A prerequisite for allowing the negotiated rates is that negotiated rate customers must have had the option to take service under the pipeline’s recourse rates. As of December 31, 2014,2015, approximately 87%90% of the system’s contracted firm transportation capacity was committed under such negotiated rate contracts. EachSome negotiated rate transaction istransactions are designed to fix the negotiated rate for the term of the firm transportation agreement and the fixed rate is generally not subject to adjustment for increased or decreased costs occurring during the contract term.
 
FERC regulations also extend to the terms and conditions set forth in agreements for transportationtransmission and storage services executed between interstate pipelines and their customers. These service agreements are required to conform, in all material respects, with the form of service agreements set forth in the pipeline’s FERC-approved tariff. In the event that the FERC finds that an agreement, in whole or part, is materially non-conforming, it could reject the agreement, require the PartnershipEQM to seek modification of the agreement or require the PartnershipEQM to modify its tariff so that the non-conforming provisions are generally available to all customers.
 
FERC Regulation of Gathering Rates and Terms of Service
 
While the FERC does not generally regulate the rates and terms of service over facilities determined to be performing a natural gas gathering function, it has traditionally regulated rates charged by interstate pipelines for gathering services performed on the pipeline’s own gathering facilities when those gathering services are performed in connection with

15

Table of Contents

jurisdictional interstate transportation. The Partnershiptransmission facilities. EQM maintains rates and terms of service in its tariff for unbundled gathering services performed on its gathering facilities in connection with the transportationtransmission service. Just as with rates and terms of service for transmission and storage services, the Partnership’sEQM’s rates and terms of services for its FERC regulatedFERC-regulated low pressure gathering system may be challenged by complaint and are subject to prospective change by the FERC. Rate increases and changes to terms and conditions of service the PartnershipEQM proposes for its FERC regulatedFERC-regulated low pressure gathering service may be protested and such increases or changes can be delayed and may ultimately be rejected by the FERC.

Section 1(b) of the NGA exempts certain natural gas gathering facilities from regulation by the FERC under the NGA. EQM believes that the Jupiter and NWV Gathering natural gas pipelines meet the traditional tests the FERC has used to establish a pipeline’s status as an exempt gatherer not subject to regulation as a natural gas company. However, the distinction between FERC-regulated transmission services and federally unregulated gathering services is the subject of ongoing litigation in the industry, so the classification and regulation of Jupiter and NWV Gathering are subject to change based on future determinations by the FERC, the courts or the U.S. Congress.

15

Table of Contents

Pipeline Safety and Maintenance
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s interstate natural gas pipeline system is subject to regulation by PHMSA. PHMSA has established safety requirements pertaining to the design, installation, testing, construction, operation and maintenance of gas pipeline facilities, including requirements that pipeline operators develop a written qualification program for individuals performing covered tasks on pipeline facilities and implement pipeline integrity management programs. These integrity management plans require more frequent inspections and other preventive measures to ensure safe operation of oil and natural gas transportation pipelines in “high consequence areas,” such as high population areas or facilities that are hard to evacuate and areas of daily concentrations of people.
 
Notwithstanding the investigatory and preventivepreventative maintenance costs incurred in the Partnership’sEQM’s performance of customary pipeline management activities, EQM may incur significant additional expenses may be incurred if anomalous pipeline conditions are discovered or more stringent pipeline safety requirements are implemented. For example, onOn August 25, 2011, PHMSA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking in which the agency solicited public comment on a number of changes to the federal natural gas transmission pipeline regulations, including: (i) modifying the definition of high consequence areas; (ii) strengthening integrity management requirements as they apply to existing regulated operators; (iii) strengthening or expanding various non-integrity pipeline management standards relating to such matters as valve spacing, automatic or remotely-controlled valves, corrosion protection and gathering lines; and (iv) adding new regulations to govern the safety of underground natural gas storage facilities including underground storage caverns and injection withdrawal well piping that are not currently regulated under the federal regulations.
 
In 2012, the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 was enacted. Among other things, the Act increases the maximum civil penalties for administrative enforcement actions, requires the DOT to study and report on the sufficiency of existing gathering line regulations to ensure safety and the use of leak detection systems by hazardous liquid pipelines, requires pipeline operators to verify their records on maximum allowable operating pressure and imposes new emergency response and incident notification requirements.  In September 2013, PHMSA released a final rule increasing the civil penalty maximums for pipeline safety violations. The rule increased the maximum penalties from $100,000 to $200,000 per day for each violation and from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 for a related series of violations.  The rule applies safety regulations to certain rural low-stress hazardous liquid pipelines not previously covered by some of its safety regulations. In August 2014, in response to a report to U.S. Congress from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, PHMSA stated that it iswas developing a rulemaking to revise its pipeline safety regulations and is examiningregulations. PHMSA continues to examine the need to adopt safety requirements for gas gathering pipelines that are not currently subject to regulations.regulations and, most recently in May 2015, issued a final rule requiring, among other things, annual inspection of certain gas gathering pipelines. PHMSA also published an advisory bulletin providing guidance to natural gas transmission operators of the need to verify records related to the maximum allowable operating pressure for each section of a pipeline system. As required by the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011, the PartnershipEQM verified its records for all applicable pipeline segments and submitted a report to the DOT identifying each pipeline segment for which records were insufficient.
 
States are generally preempted by federal law in the area of pipeline safety, but state agencies may qualify to assume responsibility for enforcing federal regulations over intrastate pipelines. They may also promulgate additive pipeline safety regulations provided that the state standards are at least as stringent as the federal standards. Although many of ourEQM's natural gas facilities fall within a class that is not subject to integrity management requirements, weEQM may incur significant costs and liabilities associated with repair, remediation, preventive or mitigation measures associated with ourits non-exempt pipelines, particularly our gatheringtransmission pipelines. This estimate does not include theThe costs, if any, for repair, remediation, preventive or mitigating actions that may be determined to be necessary as a result of the testing program, which could be substantial. Such costs and liabilities might relate to repair, remediation, preventive or mitigating actions that may be determined to be necessary as a result of the testing program, as well as lost cash flows resulting from shutting down ourEQM's pipelines during the pendency of such repairs. Additionally, should weactions, could be material.

Should EQM fail to comply with DOT regulations, weit could be subject to penalties and fines. In addition, weEQM may be required to make additional maintenance capital expenditures in the future for similar regulatory compliance initiatives that are not reflected in ourits forecasted maintenance capital expenditures.
 
The PartnershipEQM believes that its operations are in substantial compliance with all existing federal, state and local pipeline safety laws and regulations, but the PartnershipEQM can provide no assurance that the adoption of new laws and regulations,

16

Table of Contents

such as those proposed by PHMSA, will not result in significant added costs or delays in service or result in EQM not pursuing a project that could have such a material adverse effect in the future.
 

16

Table of Contents

Environmental Matters

General. The Partnership’sEQM’s operations are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations can restrict or impact the Partnership’sEQM’s business activities in many ways, such as:

requiring the acquisition of various permits to conduct regulated activities;
requiring the installation of pollution-control equipment or otherwise restricting the way the PartnershipEQM can handle or dispose of its wastes;
limiting or prohibiting construction activities in sensitive areas, such as wetlands, coastal regions or areas inhabited by endangered or threatened species; and
requiring investigatory and remedial actions to mitigate or eliminate pollution conditions caused by the Partnership’sEQM’s operations or attributable to former operations.

In addition, the Partnership’sEQM’s operations and construction activities are subject to state, county and local ordinances that restrict the time, place or manner in which those activities may be conducted so as to reduce or mitigate nuisance-type conditions, such as, for example, excessive levels of dust or noise or increased traffic congestion, requiring the PartnershipEQM to take curative actions to reduce or mitigate such conditions. However, the performance of such actions has not had a material adverse effect on the Partnership’sEQM’s results of operations.

Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including the assessment of monetary penalties, the imposition of investigatory and remedial obligations and the issuance of orders enjoining future operations or imposing additional compliance requirements. Also, certain environmental statutes impose strict, and in some cases joint and several, liability for costs required tothe clean up and restorerestoration of sites where hydrocarbons or wastes have been disposed or otherwise released. Consequently, the PartnershipEQM may be subject to environmental liability at its currently owned or operated facilities for conditions caused by others prior to its involvement.

The PartnershipEQM has implemented programs and policies designed to keep its pipelines plants and other facilities in compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations, and the PartnershipEQM does not believe that its compliance with such legal requirements will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.distributions to its unitholders. Nonetheless, the trend in environmental regulation is to place more restrictions and limitations on activities that may affect the environment, and thus,environment. Thus, there can be no assurance as to the amount or timing of future expenditures for environmental compliance or remediation, and actual future expenditures may be significantly in excess of the amounts the PartnershipEQM currently anticipates. The PartnershipFor example, during August and September 2015, the EPA published a suite of regulatory proposals aimed at reducing methane and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions across the entire oil and gas sector. These actions are part of a larger climate action plan, which focuses primarily on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the power and oil and gas sectors. In addition, on October 1, 2015, the EPA revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone from 75 parts per billion for the current 8 hour primary and secondary ozone standards to 70 parts per billion for both standards. EQM tries to anticipate future regulatory requirements that might be imposed and plan accordingly to remain in compliance with changing environmental laws and regulations and to minimize the costs of such compliance. While the PartnershipEQM believes that it is in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations, there is no assurance that the current conditions will continue in the future.

Below is a discussion of several of the material environmental laws and regulations, as amended from time to time, that relate to the Partnership’sEQM’s business.

Hazardous Substances and Waste. CERCLA and comparable state laws impose liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons who are considered to be responsible for the release of a “hazardous substance” into the environment. These persons include current and prior owners or operators of the site where a release of hazardous substances occurred and companies that transported, disposed or arranged for the transportation or disposal of the hazardous substances found at the site. Under CERCLA, these “responsible persons” may be subject to strict and joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some instances, third parties to act in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek to recover from the responsible classes of persons the costs they incur. It is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances or other pollutants released into the environment. The PartnershipEQM generates materials in the course of its ordinary operations that are regulated as “hazardous substances” under CERCLA or similar state laws and, as a result, may be jointly and severally liable under CERCLA, or such laws, for all or part of the costs required to clean up sites at which these hazardous substances have been released into the environment.


17

Table of Contents

The Partnership
EQM also generates solid wastes, including hazardous wastes, which are subject to the requirements of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and comparable state statutes. While RCRA regulates both solid and hazardous wastes, it imposes strict requirements on the generation, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of hazardous wastes. In the ordinary course of the Partnership’sEQM’s operations, the PartnershipEQM generates wastes constituting solid waste and, in some instances, hazardous wastes. While certain petroleum production wastes are excluded from RCRA’s hazardous waste regulations, it is possible that these wastes will in the future be designated as “hazardous wastes” and be subject to more rigorous and costly disposal requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’sEQM’s maintenance capital expenditures and operating expenses.

The PartnershipEQM owns, leases or leasesoperates properties where petroleum hydrocarbons are being or have been handled for many years. The PartnershipEQM has generally utilized operating and disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the time, although petroleum hydrocarbons or other wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties owned, leased or leasedoperated by the Partnership,EQM, or on or under the other locations where these petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes have been transported for treatment or disposal. In addition, certain of these properties have been operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal or release of petroleum hydrocarbons and other wastes was not under the Partnership’sEQM’s control. These properties and the wastes disposed thereon may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous state laws. Under these laws, the PartnershipEQM could be required to remove or remediate previously disposed wastes (including wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators), to clean up contaminated property (including contaminated groundwater) or to perform remedial operations to prevent future contamination.

Air Emissions. The federal Clean Air Act and comparable state laws and regulations restrict the emission of air pollutants from various industrial sources, including the Partnership’sEQM’s compressor stations, and also impose various monitoring and reporting requirements. Such laws and regulations may require that the PartnershipEQM obtain pre-approval for the construction or modification of certain projects or facilities, obtain and strictly comply with air permits containing various emissions and operational limitations and utilize specific emission control technologies to limit emissions. The Partnership’sEQM’s failure to comply with these requirements could subject it to monetary penalties, injunctions, conditions or restrictions on operations and, potentially, criminal enforcement actions. The PartnershipEQM may be required to incur certain capital expenditures in the future for air pollution control equipment in connection with obtaining and maintaining permits and approvals for air emissions. Compliance with these requirements may require modifications to certain of the Partnership’sEQM’s operations, including the installation of new equipment to control emissions from the Partnership’sEQM's compressors that could result in significant costs, including increased capital expenditures and operating costs, and could adversely impact the Partnership’sEQM’s business.

Climate Change. Legislative and regulatory measures to address climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG)GHG emissions are in various phases of discussion or implementation. The EPA regulates GHG emissions from new and modified facilities that are potential major sources of criteria pollutants under the Clean Air Act'sAct’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V programs. In addition, on January 14, 2015, the federal government announced its goal to significantly reduce methane emissions from oil and gas sources by 2025. As part ofFollowing this announcement, during August and September 2015, the EPA announcedpublished a suite of regulatory proposals that it will issue a proposed rule in the summer of 2015 and a final rule in 2016 settingset standards for methane and volatile organic compounds (VOC)VOC emissions from newthe power and modified oil and gas production sources and natural gas processing and transmission sources.sectors. PHMSA has also stated that it will proposeis considering natural gas pipeline safety standards that could result in 2015 that are expected to lowerlowering methane emissions.

The U. S.U.S. Congress, along with federal and state agencies, have considered measures to reduce the emissions of GHGs. Legislation or regulation that restricts carbon emissions could increase the Partnership’sEQM’s cost of environmental compliance by requiring the PartnershipEQM to install new equipment to reduce emissions from larger facilities and/or purchase emission allowances. Climate change and GHG legislation or regulation could also delay or otherwise negatively affect efforts to obtain permits and other regulatory approvals with regard to existing and new facilities or impose additional monitoring and reporting requirements. For example, while the EPA has had rules in effect since 2011 that require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain petroleum and natural gas sources in the United States, including among others, onshore processing, transmission and storage facilities, only recently, in December 2014,October 2015, the EPA proposedfinalized changes to this reporting rule that would expand the petroleum and natural gas system sources for which annual GHG emissions reporting is currently required to include, beginning in the 2016 reporting year, certain on shoreonshore gathering and boosting systems consisting primarily of gathering pipelines, compressors and processing equipment used to perform natural gas compression, dehydration and acid gas removal activities.activities and blowdowns of natural gas transmission pipelines. Conversely, legislation or regulation that sets a price on or otherwise restricts carbon emissions could also benefit the PartnershipEQM by increasing demand for natural gas because the combustion of natural gas results in substantially fewer carbon emissions per Btu of heat generated than other fossil fuels such as coal. The effect on the PartnershipEQM of any new legislative or regulatory measures will depend on the particular provisions that are ultimately adopted.

Water Discharges. The federal Clean Water Act and analogous state laws impose restrictions and strict controls regarding the discharge of pollutants or dredged and fill material into state waters as well as waters of the U.S., including

18

Table of Contents

adjacent wetlands. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of permits issued by the EPA,

18

Table of Contents

the Army Corps of Engineers or an analogous state agency. Spill prevention, control and countermeasure requirements of federal laws require appropriate containment berms and similar structures to help prevent the contamination of regulated waters in the event of a hydrocarbon spill, rupture or leak. In addition, the Clean Water Act and analogous state laws require individual permits or coverage under general permits for discharges of storm water runoff from certain types of facilities. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance with discharge permits or other requirements of the Clean Water Act and analogous state laws. The PartnershipEQM believes that compliance with existing permits and foreseeable new permit requirements will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.distributions to its unitholders.

National Environmental Policy Act. The construction of interstate natural gas transportation pipelines pursuant to the NGA requires authorization from the FERC. FERC actions are subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires federal agencies, such as the FERC, to evaluate major agency actions having the potential to significantly impact the environment. In the course of such evaluations, an agency will either prepare an environmental assessment that assesses the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of a proposed project and,or, if necessary, will prepare a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement that may be made available for public review and comment. Any proposed plans for future construction activities that require FERC authorization will be subject to the requirements of NEPA. This process has the potential to significantly delay or limit, orand increase the cost of, development of midstream infrastructure.

Endangered Species Act. The federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) restricts activities that may adversely affect endangered and threatened species or their habitats. Federal agencies are required to ensure that any action authorized, funded or carried out by them is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species or modify their critical habitat. While some of the Partnership’sEQM’s facilities may beare located in areas that are designated as habitats for endangered or threatened species, the PartnershipEQM believes that it is in substantial compliance with the ESA. However,In addition, the designation of previously unprotected species as being endangered or threatened, or the designation of previously unprotected areas as a critical habitat for such species, could cause the PartnershipEQM to incur additional costs, result in delays in construction of pipelines and facilities, or cause EQM to become subject to operating restrictions in areas where the species are known to exist. For example, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced in 2015 that it will consider hundreds of additional species for listing as endangered or threatened as a result of several litigation settlements. Some of the species that may ultimately be listed may be located in areas in which EQM operates.

Employee Health and Safety. The PartnershipEQM is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and comparable state statutes, whose purpose is to protect the health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community “right-to-know” regulations and comparable state laws and regulations require that information be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or produced in the Partnership’sEQM’s operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens. The PartnershipEQM believes that it is in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to worker health and safety.

Seasonality

 
Weather impacts natural gas demand for power generation and heating purposes. Peak demand for natural gas typically occurs during the winter months as a result of the heating load.
 
 
Title to Properties and Rights-of-Way
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s real property falls into two categories: (i) parcels that it owns in fee and (ii) parcels in which its interest derives from leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits or licenses from landowners or governmental authorities, permitting the use of such land for the Partnership’sEQM’s operations. Portions of the land on which the Partnership’sEQM’s pipelines and facilities are located are owned by the PartnershipEQM in fee title, and it believes that it has satisfactory title to these lands. The remainder of the land on which the Partnership’sEQM’s pipelines and facilities are located are held by the PartnershipEQM pursuant to surface leases or easements between the Partnership,EQM, as lessee or grantee, and the respective fee owners of the lands, as lessors or grantors. The PartnershipEQM has held, leased or owned many of these lands for many years without any material challenge known to the PartnershipEQM relating to the title to the land upon which the assets are located, and it is believedEQM believes that the Partnershipit has satisfactory leasehold estates, easement interests or fee ownership to such lands. The PartnershipEQM believes that it has satisfactory title to all of its material leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits and licenses, and the PartnershipEQM has no knowledge of any material challenge to its title to such assets or their underlying fee title.
 
However, thereThere are, however, certain lands within the Partnership’sEQM’s storage pools as to which it does not currently have real property rights. The PartnershipEQM has identified the lands as to which it believes it must obtain such rights and is in the midst of a program to

19

Table of Contents

acquire such rights. Since the beginning of this program in 2009 through December 31, 2014, the Partnership2015, EQM has successfully acquired such rights for approximately 28,37330,000 acres out of a total 52,036approximately 62,000 acres, and the PartnershipEQM expects to

19

Table of Contents

acquire the remainder within the next three years. In accordance with the Partnership’sEQM’s FERC certificate, the geological formations within which its permitted storage facilities are located cannot be used by third parties in any way that would detrimentally affect its storage operations, and the PartnershipEQM has the power of eminent domain with respect to the acquisition of necessary real property rights to use such storage facilities. The PartnershipEQM believes the cost to acquire the remaining rights will be approximately $6$7 million over the next three years.
 
Some of the leases, easements, rights-of-way, permits and licenses whichthat were transferred to the PartnershipEQM at the closing of theits IPO in July 2012 required the consent of the grantor of such rights, which in certain instances is a governmental entity. The PartnershipEQM obtained, prior to the closing of theits IPO, sufficient third-partythird party consents, permits and authorizations for the transfer of the assets necessary to enable it to operate its business in all material respects.
 
EQT and its affiliates continue to hold record title to portions of certain assets until the PartnershipEQM makes the appropriate filings in the jurisdictions in which such assets are located and obtains any consents and approvals that were not obtained prior to theEQM's IPO. Such consents and approvals include those required by federal and state agencies or political subdivisions. In some cases, EQT or its affiliates may, where required consents or approvals have not been obtained, temporarily hold title to property as nominee for the Partnership’sEQM’s benefit until a future date. The PartnershipEQM anticipates that there will be no material change in the tax treatment of its common units resulting from EQT holding the title to any part of such assets subject to future conveyance or as the Partnership’sEQM’s nominee.
 
Insurance
 
The PartnershipEQM generally shares insurance coverage with EQT. EQM reimburses EQT for which it reimburses EQTthe cost of the insurance pursuant to the terms of theEQM's omnibus agreement.agreement with EQT. The Partnership’s insurance program includes generalexcess liability insurance, auto liability insurance, workers’ compensation insurance and property insurance. In addition, the PartnershipEQM has procured separate general liability and directors and officers liability policies. All insurance coverage is in amounts which management believes areto be reasonable and appropriate.

Facilities
 
EQT leases its corporate offices in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, the PartnershipEQM pays a proportionate share of EQT’s costs to lease the building.
 
Employees
 
The PartnershipEQM does not have any employees. The PartnershipEQM is managed by the directors and officers of its general partner. All executive management personnel of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner are employees of EQT or an affiliateofficers of EQT and devote the portion of their time to the Partnership’sEQM’s business and affairs that is required to manage and conduct its operations. The daily business operations of the PartnershipEQM are conducted by EQT Gathering, LLC (EQT Gathering), one of EQT’s operating subsidiaries. Under the terms of the omnibus agreement with EQT, the PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT for the provision of general and administrative services for its benefit, for direct expenses incurred by EQT on the Partnership’sEQM’s behalf, for expenses allocated to the PartnershipEQM as a result of it being a public entity and for operation and management services provided by EQT Gathering.
 
Availability of Reports
 
The PartnershipEQM makes certain filings with the SEC, including its annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reportsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, current reportsCurrent Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments and exhibits to those reports, available free of charge through its website, http://www.eqtmidstreampartners.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after the date they are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.  The filings are also available at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.  These filings are also available on the internet at http://www.sec.gov.
 

20

Table of Contents

Composition of Segment Operating Revenues
 

Presented below are operating revenues by segment as a percentage of total operating revenues of the Partnership.EQM.
 
 For the year ended December 31, For the year ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Transmission and storage operating revenues 65% 57% 60% 48% 53% 49%
Gathering operating revenues 35% 43% 40% 52% 47% 51%
 
Financial Information about Segments
 
See Note 34 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements for financial information by business segment including, but not limited to, revenues from external customers, operating income and total assets, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Jurisdiction and Year of Formation
 
EQT Midstream Partners, LP is a Delaware limited partnership formed in January 2012.
 
Financial Information about Geographic Areas
 
All of the Partnership’sEQM’s assets and operations are located in the continental United States.

21

Table of Contents


Item 1A.  Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Business
  
In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered in evaluating our business and future prospects.  Please note that additional risks not presently known to us or that are currently considered immaterial may also have a negative impact on our business and operations.  If any of the events or circumstances described below actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions could suffer and the trading price of our common units could decline.
 
Risks Inherent in Our Business
 
We are dependent on EQT for a substantial majority of our revenues and future growth. Therefore, we are indirectly subject to the business risks of EQT. We have no control over EQT’s business decisions and operations, and EQT is under no obligation to adopt a business strategy that favors us.
 
Historically, we have provided a substantial percentage of our natural gas transmission, storage and gathering services to EQT. During the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, approximately 62%73% of our revenues were from EQT. We expect to derive a substantial majority of our revenues from EQT for the foreseeable future. Therefore, any event, whether in our areaareas of operations or otherwise, that adversely affects EQT’s production, financial condition, leverage, results of operations or cash flows may adversely affect our ability to sustain or increase cash distributions to our unitholders. Accordingly, we are indirectly subject to the business risks of EQT, including the following:
 
natural gas price volatility or a sustained period of lower commodity prices may have an adverse effect on itsEQT's drilling operations, revenue, profitability, future rate of growth and liquidity;
a reduction in or slowing of EQT's anticipated drilling and production schedule, which would directly and adversely impact demand for EQM's services;
infrastructure capacity constraints and interruptions;
risks associated with the operation of itsEQT's wells, pipelines and facilities, including potential environmental liabilities;
the availability of capital on a satisfactory economic basis to fund itsEQT's operations;
itsEQT's ability to identify exploration, development and production opportunities based on market conditions;
uncertainties inherent in projecting future rates of production;
itsEQT's ability to develop additional reserves that are economically recoverable, to optimize existing well production and to sustain production;
adverse effects of governmental and environmental regulation and negative public perception regarding itsEQT's operations; and
the loss of key personnel.
 
For example, as a result of lower commodity prices, in December 2015, EQT recently reduced its 2015announced a 2016 capital expenditure forecast for well development (excluding land acquisitions) from $2.3 billion to $1.85 billion.of $820 million, which is 51% lower than EQT's 2015 capital expenditures for well development. EQT may further reduce its capital expenditure spending in the future based on commodity prices or other factors. Unless we are successful in attracting significant unaffiliated third-partythird party customers, our ability to maintain or increase the capacity subscribed and volumes transported under service arrangements on our transmission and storage system as well as the volumes gathered on ourand gathering systemsystems will be dependent on receiving consistent or increasing commitments from EQT. While EQT has dedicated acreage to, and entered into long-term firm transportationtransmission and gathering contracts on, our systems, it may determine in the future that drilling in areas outside of our current areas of operations is strategically more attractive to it and it is under no contractual obligation to maintain its production dedicated to us. A reduction in the capacity subscribed or volumes transported, stored or gathered on our systems by EQT could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.

Please see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in EQT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (which is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated by reference herein) for a full discussion of the risks associated with EQT’s business.
 
We may not have sufficient cash from operations following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including cost reimbursements to EQT and its affiliates, to enable us to pay the minimum quarterly distributioncash distributions to holders of our common and subordinated units.unitholders.
 

22

Table of Contents

In order to pay the minimum quarterlyannounced fourth quarter 2015 distribution of $0.35$0.71 per unit per quarter, or $1.40$2.84 per unit on an annualized basis, we will require available cash of approximately $21.7$72.6 million per quarter, or $86.7$290.3 million per year, based on the number of common subordinated and general partner units and the incentive distribution rights (IDRs) outstanding at December 31, 2014.2015. We may not have sufficient available cash each quarter to enable us to pay the minimum quarterly cash distribution. The amount of cash we can distribute on our units principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:

22


the rates we charge for our transmission, storage and gathering services;
the level of firm transmission, storage and storagegathering capacity sold and volumes of natural gas we transport, store and gather for our customers;
regional, domestic and foreign supply and perceptions of supply of natural gas; the level of demand and perceptions of demand in our end-use markets; and actual and anticipated future prices of natural gas and other commodities (and the volatility thereof), which may impact our ability to renew and replace firm transmission, storage and storagegathering agreements;
the effect of seasonal variations in temperature on the amount of natural gas that we transport, store and gather;
the level of competition from other midstream energy companies in our geographic markets;
the creditworthiness of our customers;
restrictions contained in our joint venture agreements;
the level of our operating, maintenance and general and administrative costs;
regulatory action affecting the supply of, or demand for, natural gas, the rates we can charge on our assets, how we contract for services, our existing contracts, our operating costs or our operating flexibility; and
prevailing economic conditions.
 
In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available for distribution will depend on other factors, including:
 
the level and timing of capital expenditures we make;
the level of our operating and general and administrative expenses, including reimbursements to our general partner and its affiliates, including EQT, for services provided to us;
the cost of acquisitions, if any;
our debt service requirements and other liabilities;
fluctuations in our working capital needs;
our ability to borrow funds and access capital markets on satisfactory terms;
restrictions on distributions contained in our debt agreements;
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner; and
other business risks affecting our cash levels.
 
Our natural gas transportation,transmission, storage and gathering services are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local regulatory authorities. Changes or additional regulatory measures adopted by such authorities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make distributions.
 
Our interstate natural gas transportationtransmission and storage operations are regulated by the FERC under the NGA, the NGPA, and the Energy Policy Act of 2005. OurCertain portions of our gathering operations are also rate-regulated by the FERC in connection with our interstate transportationtransmission operations. Our system operatesFERC-regulated systems operate under a tariff approved by the FERC that establishes rates, cost recovery mechanisms and terms and conditions of service to our customers. Generally, the FERC’s authority extends to:
 
rates and charges for our natural gas transmission and storage and FERC-regulated gathering services;
certification and construction of new interstate transmission and storage facilities;
abandonment of interstate transmission and storage services and facilities;
maintenance of accounts and records;
relationships between pipelines and certain affiliates;
terms and conditions of services and service contracts with customers;
depreciation and amortization policies;
acquisitionacquisitions and dispositiondispositions of interstate transmission and storage facilities; and
initiation and discontinuation of interstate transmission and storage services.
 
Interstate pipelines may not charge rates or impose terms and conditions of service that, upon review by the FERC, are found to be unjust and unreasonable or unduly discriminatory. The recourse rate that may be charged by our interstate pipeline

23


for its transmission and storage services is established through the FERC’s ratemaking process. The maximum applicable recourse rate and terms and conditions for service are set forth in our FERC-approved tariff.

Pursuant to the NGA, existing interstate transportationtransmission and storage rates and terms and conditions of service may be challenged by complaint and are subject to prospective change by the FERC. Additionally, rate increases and changes to terms and conditions of service proposed by a regulated interstate pipeline may be protested and such increases or changes can be delayed and may ultimately be rejected by the FERC. We currently hold authority from the FERC to charge and collect (i) “recourse rates,” which are the maximum rates an interstate pipeline may charge for its services under its tariff, and (ii) “negotiated rates,” which involve rates above or below the "recourse rates," provided that the affected customers are willing to agree to such rates for a specific term and that the FERC has approved the negotiated rate agreement. As of December 31,

23


2014, 2015, approximately 87%90% of our system’s contracted firm transportationtransmission capacity was committed under such “negotiated rate” contracts, rather than recourse rate or discount rate contracts. There can be no guarantee that we will be allowed to continue to operate under such rate structures for the remainder of those assets’ operating lives. Any successful challenge against rates charged for our transportationtransmission and storage services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make distributions.quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
While the FERC does not generally regulate the rates and terms of service over facilities determined to be performing a natural gas gathering function, the FERC has traditionally regulated rates charged by interstate pipelines for gathering services performed on the pipeline’s own gathering facilities when those gathering services are performed in connection with jurisdictional interstate transmission facilities. We maintain rates and terms of service in our tariff for unbundled gathering services performed on a portion of our gathering facilities whichthat are connected to our transmission and storage system. Just as with rates and terms of service for transportationtransmission and storage services, our rates and terms of services for our FERC-regulated gathering services may be challenged by complaint and are subject to prospective change by the FERC. Rate increases and changes to terms and conditions of service which we propose for our FERC-regulated gathering serviceservices may be protested and such increases or changes can be delayed and may ultimately be rejected by the FERC.
 
The FERC’s jurisdiction extends to the certification and construction of interstate transportationtransmission and storage facilities, including, but not limited to, acquisitions, facility maintenance, expansions, and abandonment of facilities and services. While the FERC exercises jurisdiction over the rates and terms of service for our FERC-regulated gathering operations, ourservices, these gathering facilities are not subject to the FERC’s certification and construction authority. Prior to commencing construction of new or existing interstate transportationtransmission and storage facilities, an interstate pipeline must obtain a certificate authorizing the construction, or file to amend its existing certificate, from the FERC. Typically, a significant expansion project requires review by a number of governmental agencies, including state and local agencies, whose cooperation is important in completing the regulatory process on schedule. Any agency's delay in the issuance of, or refusal by an agency to issue, authorizations or permits for one or more of these projects may mean that we will not be able to pursue these projects or that they will be constructed in a manner or with capital requirements that we did not anticipate. Such refusaldelays, refusals or modificationresulting modifications to projects could materially and negatively impact the additional revenues and costs expected from these projects or cause us to abandon planned projects.
 
FERC regulations also extend to the terms and conditions set forth in agreements for transportationtransmission and storage services executed between interstate pipelines and their customers. These service agreements are required to conform, in all material respects, with the form of service agreements set forth in the pipeline’s FERC-approved tariff. Non-conforming agreements must be filed with, and accepted by, the FERC. In the event that the FERC finds that an agreement, in whole or part, is materially non-conforming, it could reject the agreement or require us to seek modification, or alternatively require us to modify our tariff so that the non-conforming provisions are generally available to all customers.
 
Under current policy, the FERC permits interstate pipelines to include an income tax allowance in the cost-of-service used as the basis for calculating their regulated rates. For pipelines owned by partnerships or limited liability companies taxed as partnerships for federal income tax purposes, the tax allowance will reflect the actual or potential income tax liability on the FERC-jurisdictional income attributable to all partnership or limited liability company interests if the ultimate owner of the interest has an actual or potential income tax liability on such income. This policy was upheld on May 29, 2007 by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The FERC will determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether the owners of an interstate pipeline have such actual or potential income tax liability. In a future rate case, we may be required to demonstrate the extent to which inclusion of an income tax allowance in the applicable cost-of-service is permitted under the current income tax allowance policy. In addition, the FERC’s income tax allowance policy is frequently the subject of challenge, and we cannot predict whether the FERC or a reviewing court will alter the existing policy. If the FERC’s policy were to change and if the FERC were to disallow a substantial portion of our pipelines' income tax allowance, our regulated rates, and therefore our revenues and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders, could be materially adversely affected.
 

24


The FERC may not continue to pursue its approach of pro-competitive policies as it considers matters such as interstate pipeline rates and rules and policies that may affect rights of access to natural gas transportationtransmission capacity and transportationtransmission and storage facilities.
 
Section 1(b) of the NGA exempts certain natural gas gathering facilities from regulation by the FERC as a natural gas company under the NGA. We believe that theour high pressure natural gas pipelines in the Jupiter gathering systems meet the traditional tests the FERC has used to establish a pipeline’s status as an exempt gatherer not subject to regulation as a natural gas company.company, although the FERC has not made a formal determination with respect to the jurisdictional status of those facilities. However, the distinction between FERC-regulated transmission services and federally unregulated gathering services is the subject of ongoing litigation within the industry, so the classification and regulation of the Jupiter gathering facilitiesand NWV Gathering are subject to change based on future determinations by the FERC, the courts or the U.S. Congress. Failure to comply with applicable provisions of the NGA, the NGPA, the Pipeline Safety Act of 1968 and certain other laws, as well as with the regulations, rules, orders, restrictions and

24


conditions associated with these laws, could result in the imposition of administrative and criminal remedies and civil penalties of up to $1,000,000$200,000 per day, per violation.for each violation and up to a maximum penalty of $2,000,000 for a related series of violations.
 
In addition, future federal, state or local legislation or regulations under which we will operate our natural gas transportation,transmission, storage and gathering businesses may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
Any significant decrease in production of natural gas in our areas of operation could adversely affect our business and operating results and reduce our distributable cash flow.
 
Our business is dependent on the continued availability of natural gas production and reserves in our areas of operation. Low pricesA sustained low price environment for natural gas or regulatory limitations could adversely affect development of additional reserves and production that is accessible by our pipeline and storage assets. Production from existing wells and natural gas supply basins with access to our systems will naturally decline over time. The amount of natural gas reserves underlying these wells may also be less than anticipated, and the rate at which production from these reserves declines may be greater than anticipated. Additionally, the competition for natural gas supplies to serve other markets could reduce the amount of natural gas supply for our customers, or lowera sustained low price environment for natural gas prices could cause producers to determine in the future that drilling activities in areas outside of our current areas of operation are strategically more attractive to them. A reduction in the natural gas volumes supplied by EQT or other third party producers could result in reduced throughput on our systems and adversely impact our ability to grow our operations and increase quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders. Accordingly, to maintain or increase the contracted capacity or the volume of natural gas transported, stored and gathered on our systems and cash flows associated therewith, our customers must continually obtain adequate supplies of natural gas.
 
The primary factors affecting our ability to obtain non-dedicated sources of natural gas include (i) the level of successful drilling activity near our systems and (ii) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new wells. While EQT has dedicated production from certain of its leased properties to us, we have no control over the level of drilling activity in our areas of operation, the amount of reserves associated with wells connected to our gathering systemsystems or the rate at which production from a well declines. In addition, we have no control over EQT or other producers or their drilling or production decisions, which are affected by, among other things, the availability and cost of capital, prevailing and projected energy prices, demand for hydrocarbons, levels of reserves, geological considerations, environmental or other governmental regulations, the availability of drilling permits, the availability of drilling rigs, and other production and development costs.
 
Fluctuations in energy prices can also greatly affect the development of new natural gas reserves. In general terms, the prices of natural gas, oil and other hydrocarbon products fluctuate in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. These factorsFor example, the average daily prices for NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas ranged from a high of $3.23 per MMBtu to a low of $1.76 per MMBtu from January 1, 2015 through February 10, 2016, and the average daily prices for NYMEX West Texas Intermediate crude oil ranged from a high of $61.43 per barrel to a low of $26.55 per barrel during the same period. Factors affecting commodity prices include worldwide economic conditions; weather conditions and seasonal trends; the levels of domestic production and consumer demand; the availability of imported LNG;liquefied natural gas (LNG); the ability to export LNG; the availability of transportation systems with adequate capacity; the volatility and uncertainty of regional basis differentials and premiums; the price and availability of alternative fuels; the effecteffects of energy conservation measures; the nature and extent of governmental regulation and taxation; and the anticipated future prices of natural gas, LNG and other commodities. Declines in natural gas prices could have had a negative impact on exploration, development and production activity and, if sustained, could lead to a material decrease in such activity. For example, in December 2015, EQT announced a 2016 capital expenditure forecast for well development of $820 million,

25


which is 51% lower than EQT's 2015 capital expenditures for well development. Sustained reductions in exploration or production activity in our areas of operation would lead to reduced utilization of our systems. Because of these factors, even if new natural gas reserves are known to exist in areas served by our assets, producers may choose not to develop those reserves. Moreover, EQT may not develop the acreage it has dedicated to us. If reductions in drilling activity result in our inability to maintain levels of contracted capacity and throughput, it could reduce our revenue and impair our ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
In addition, it may be more difficult to maintain or increase the current volumes on our gathering systems in unconventional resource plays such as the Marcellus Shale, as the basins in those plays generally have higher initial production rates and steeper production decline curves than wells in more conventional basins. Furthermore, our gathering assets were initially constructed as a low-pressure system designed for shallow, vertical wells and Marcellus Shale production is increasingly from horizontal wells at higher pressure than our existing gathering assets were designed to handle. If natural gas prices remain low, production in the area around our low-pressure gathering system may continue to decline. Accordingly, volumes on our gathering system would need to be replaced at a faster rate to maintain or grow the current volumes than may be the case in other regions of production. Should we determine that the economics of our gathering assets do not justify the capital expenditures needed to grow or maintain volumes associated therewith, revenues associated with these assets will decline over time.

25


We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of natural gas reserves connected to our systems. Accordingly, we do not have independent estimates of total reserves connected to our systems or the anticipated life of such reserves. If the total reserves or estimated life of the reserves connected to our systems are less than we anticipate, or the timeline for the development of reserves is longer than we anticipate, and we are unable to secure additional sources of natural gas, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.

If new supplies of natural gas are not obtained to replace the natural decline in volumes from existing supply basins, or if natural gas supplies are diverted to serve other markets, the overall volume of natural gas transported, stored and storedgathered on our systems would decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and on our ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
We may not be able to increase our third-partythird party throughput and resulting revenue due to competition and other factors, which could limit our ability to grow and extend our dependence on EQT.
 
Part of our growth strategy includes diversifying our customer base by identifying opportunities to offer services to third parties other than EQT. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, EQT accounted for approximately 51%53%, 80%51% and 81%80%, respectively, of our transmission revenues, 2%1%, 61%2% and 68%61%, respectively, of our storage revenues, 93%97%, 96% and 93%97%, respectively, of our gathering revenues and 62%73%, 86%69% and 85%88%, respectively, of our total operating revenues. Our ability to increase our third-partythird party throughput and resulting revenue is subject to numerous factors beyond our control, including competition from third parties and the extent to which we have available capacity when third-partythird party shippers require it. To the extent that we lack available capacity on our systems for third-partythird party volumes, we may not be able to compete effectively with third-partythird party systems for additional natural gas production in our areas of operation.
 
We have historically provided transmission, storage and gathering services to third parties on only a limited basis and we may not be able to attract material third-partythird party service opportunities. Our efforts to attract new unaffiliated customers may be adversely affected by our relationship with EQT and our desire to provide services pursuant to fee-basedlong-term firm contracts. Our potential customers may prefer to obtain services under other forms of contractual arrangements under which we would be required to assume direct commodity exposure, and potential customers may desire to contract for gathering services that are not subject to FERC regulation.exposure. In addition, we will need to continue to improve our reputation among our potential customer base for providing high quality service in order to continue to successfully attract unaffiliated third parties.
 
We are exposed to the credit risk of our customerscounterparties in the ordinary course of our business.
 
We extend credit to our customers as a normal part of our business. As a result, we are exposed to the risk of loss resulting from the nonpayment and/or nonperformance of our customers.customers, suppliers, joint venture partners and other counterparties. We extend credit to our customers, including EQT, our largest customer, as a normal part of our business. While we have established credit policies, including assessing the creditworthiness of our customers as permitted by our FERC-approved natural gas tariff, and requiring appropriate terms or credit support from them based on the results of such assessments, we may not have adequately assessed the creditworthiness of our existing or future customers. Furthermore, unanticipated future events could resultWe cannot predict the extent to which EQT’s and our other counterparties’ businesses would be impacted if commodity prices further deteriorate, commodity prices remain depressed for a sustained period of time, or other conditions in a deterioration of the creditworthiness ofenergy industry were to deteriorate, nor can we estimate the impact such conditions would have on our contracted customers, including EQT.counterparties’ abilities to perform under their transmission, storage and gathering agreements with us. Any resulting nonpayment and/or nonperformance by our customerscounterparties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
Increased competition from other companies that provide transmission, storage or gathering services, or from alternative fuel sources, could have a negative impact on the demand for our services, which could adversely affect our financial results.

Our ability to renew or replace existing contracts at rates sufficient to maintain current revenues and cash flows could be adversely affected by the activities of our competitors. Our systems compete primarily with other interstate and intrastate pipelines and storage facilities in the transportationtransmission, storage and storagegathering of natural gas. Some of our competitors have greater

26


financial resources and may now, or in the future, have access to greater supplies of natural gas than we do. Some of these competitors may expand or construct transportationtransmission and storage systems or gathering systems that would create additional competition for the services we provide to our customers. In addition, our customers may develop their own transmission, storage or gathering services instead of using ours. Moreover, EQT, EQGP and itstheir respective affiliates are not limited in their ability to compete with us.
 
The policies of the FERC promoting competition in natural gas markets are having the effect of increasing the natural gas transportationtransmission and storage options for our traditional customer base. As a result, we could experience some “turnback” of firm capacity as existing agreements expire. If we are unable to remarket this capacity or can remarket it only at substantially discounted rates compared to previous contracts, we may have to bear the costs associated with the turned back capacity.

26


Increased competition could reduce the volumes of natural gas transported or stored by our systems or, in cases where we do not have long-term fixed ratefirm contracts, could force us to lower our transportationtransmission or storage rates.
 
Further, natural gas as a fuel competes with other forms of energy available to end-users, including electricity, coal and liquid fuels. Increased demand for such forms of energy at the expense of natural gas could lead to a reduction in demand for natural gas storage, transmission and transportationgathering services.
 
All of these competitive pressures could make it more difficult for us to retain our existing customers and/or attract new customers as we seek to expand our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders. In addition, competition could intensify the negative impact of factors that decrease demand for natural gas in the markets served by our systems, such as adverse economic conditions, weather, higher fuel costs and taxes or other governmental or regulatory actions that directly or indirectly increase the cost or limit the use of natural gas.
 
If third-partythird party pipelines and other facilities interconnected to our pipelines and facilities become unavailable to transport natural gas, our revenues and cash available to make distributions to our unitholders could be adversely affected.
 
We depend upon third-partythird party pipelines and other facilities that provide receipt and delivery options to and from our transmission and storage system. For example, our transmission and storage system interconnects with the following interstate pipelines: Texas Eastern, Dominion Transmission, Columbia Gas Transmission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, as well as multiple distribution companies. Similarly, our gathering system hassystems have multiple delivery interconnects to multiple interstate pipelines. In the event that our access to such systems was impaired or if we were unable to maintain processing and treating contracts on acceptable terms, the amount of natural gas that our gathering systemsystems can gather and transport onto our transmission and storage system would be adversely affected, which could reduce revenues from our gathering activities. Because we do not own these third party pipelines or facilities, their continuing operation is not within our control. If these or any other pipeline connections or facilities were to become unavailable for current or future volumes of natural gas due to repairs, damage to the facility, lack of capacity or any other reason, our ability to operate efficiently and continue shipping natural gas to end markets could be restricted, thereby reducing our revenues. Any temporary or permanent interruption at any key pipeline interconnect or facility could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
Certain of the services we provide on our transmission and storage system are subject to long-term, fixed-price “negotiated rate” contracts that are not subject to adjustment, even if our cost to perform such services exceeds the revenues received from such contracts, and, as a result, our costs could exceed our revenues received under such contracts.
 
It is possible that costs to perform services under “negotiated rate” contracts will exceed the negotiated rates.rates we have agreed to provide to our customers. If this occurs, it could decrease the cash flow realized by our systems and, therefore, the cash we have available for distribution to our unitholders. Under FERC policy, a regulated service provider and a customer may mutually agree to a “negotiated rate,” and that contract must be filed with and accepted by the FERC. As of December 31, 2014,2015, approximately 87%90% of our contracted transmission firm capacity was subscribed under such “negotiated rate” contracts. These “negotiated rate” contracts aremay not generally be subject to adjustment for increased costs which could be caused by inflation or other factors relating to the specific facilities being used to perform the services.
 
We may not be able to renew or replace expiring contracts at favorable rates or on a long-term basis.
 
Our primary exposure to market risk occurs at the time our existing contracts expire and are subject to renegotiation and renewal. AsIncluding contracts on the AVC facilities and contracts associated with expected future capacity from expansion projects that are not yet fully constructed but for which EQM has entered into firm contracts, firm transmission and storage

27


contracts have a weighted average remaining term of approximately 17 years and firm gathering contracts have a weighted average remaining term of approximately 9 years as of December 31, 2014, the weighted average remaining contract life based on total projected contracted revenues for our firm transmission and storage contracts, including those on AVC, was approximately 17 years.2015. The extension or replacement of existing contracts, including our contracts with EQT, depends on a number of factors beyond our control, including:
 
the level of existing and new competition to provide services to our markets;
the macroeconomic factors affecting natural gas economics for our current and potential customers;
the balance of supply and demand, on a short-term, seasonal and long-term basis, in our markets;
the extent to which the customers in our markets are willing to contract on a long-term basis; and
the effects of federal, state or local regulations on the contracting practices of our customers.
 

27


Any failure to extend or replace a significant portion of our existing contracts, or extending or replacing them at unfavorable or lower rates, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
If the tariff governing the services we provide is successfully challenged, we could be required to reduce our tariff rates, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
On January 14, 2013, Equitrans filed a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Settlement) with the FERC. The Settlement associated with the PSCT provides that the Partnership will not file a general rate case on or before October 1, 2015 and that the parties to the Settlement will not file a challenge to such rates prior to December 31, 2015. However,Rate payers, the FERC or other interested stakeholders, such as state regulatory agencies, may still challenge theour recourse rates, discounted rates offered to individual customers or the terms and conditions of service included in our tariff. We do not have an agreement in place that would prohibit customers, including EQT or its affiliates, from challenging our tariff. If any challenge were successful, among other things, the rates that we charge on our systems could be reduced. Successful challenges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
If we are unable to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms from EQT or third parties, our future growth may be limited, and the acquisitions we do make may reduce, rather than increase, our cash generated from operations on a per unit basis.
Our ability to grow depends, in part, on our ability to make acquisitions that increase our cash generated from operations on a per unit basis. The acquisition component of our strategy is based, in large part, on our expectation of ongoing divestitures of midstream energy assets by industry participants, including EQT. We have no contractual arrangement with EQT that would require it to provide us with an opportunity to offer to purchase midstream assets that it may sell. Accordingly, while we believe EQT will be incentivized as a consequence of its economic relationship with us to offer us opportunities to purchase midstream assets, there can be no assurance that any such offer will be made. Furthermore, many factors could impair our ability to acquire future midstream assets and the willingness of EQT to offer us acquisition opportunities, including a change in control of EQT or a transfer of the incentive distribution rights by our general partner to a third party. A material decrease in divestitures of midstream energy assets from EQT or otherwise would limit our opportunities for future acquisitions and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
If we are unable to make accretive acquisitions from EQT or third parties, whether because, among other reasons, (i) EQT elects not to sell or contribute additional assets to us or to offer acquisition opportunities to us, (ii) we are unable to identify attractive third-party acquisition opportunities, (iii) we are unable to negotiate acceptable purchase contracts with EQT or third parties, (iv) we are unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, (v) we are outbid by competitors or (vi) we are unable to obtain necessary governmental or third-party consents, then our future growth and ability to increase distributions will be limited. Furthermore, even if we do make acquisitions that we believe will be accretive, these acquisitions may nevertheless result in a decrease in the cash generated from operations on a per unit basis.
Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things:
mistaken assumptions about volumes, revenue and costs, including synergies and potential growth;
an inability to secure adequate customer commitments to use the acquired systems or facilities;
an inability to integrate successfully the assets or businesses we acquire;
the assumption of unknown liabilities for which we are not indemnified or for which our indemnity is inadequate;
the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention from other business concerns; and
unforeseen difficulties operating in new geographic areas or business lines.
If any acquisition fails to be accretive to our distributable cash flow per unit, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
If we do not complete expansion projects, our future growth may be limited.

A significant component of our growth strategy is to continue to grow the cash distributions on our units by expanding our business. Our ability to grow depends, in part, upon our ability to complete expansion projects that result in an increase in the cash we generate. We may be unable to complete successful, accretive expansion projects for many reasons, including, but

28


not limited to, the following:

an inability to identify attractive expansion projects;
an inability to obtain necessary rights-of-way or permits or other government approvals, including approvals by regulatory agencies;
an inability to successfully integrate the infrastructure we build;
our abilityan inability to raise financing for expansion projects on economically acceptable terms;
incorrect assumptions about volumes, revenues and costs, including potential growth; or
our abilityan inability to secure adequate customer commitments to use the newly expanded facilities.

Expanding our business by constructing new midstream assets subjects us to risks.
 
Organic and greenfield growth projects are a significant component of our growth strategy. The development and construction of pipelines and storage facilities involves numerous regulatory, environmental, political and legal uncertainties beyond our control and may require the expenditure of significant amounts of capital. The development and construction of pipelines and storage facilities exposesexpose us to construction risks such as the failure to meet affiliate and third-partythird party contractual requirements, delays caused by landowners or advocacy groups opposed to the oil and gas industry, environmental hazards, the lack of available skilled labor, equipment and materials and the inability to obtain necessary approvals and permits from regulatory agencies on a timely basis. These types of projects may not be completed on schedule, at the budgeted cost or at all. Moreover, our revenues may not increase for some time after completion of a particular project. For instance, we will be required to pay construction costs generally as they are incurred but construction will typically occur over an extended period of time, and we will not receive material increases in revenues until the project is placed into service. Moreover, we may construct facilities to capture anticipated future growth in production and/or demand in a region in which such growth does not materialize. As a result, new facilities may not be able to attract enough throughput to achieve our expected investment return, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make distributions.quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
Certain of our internal growth projects may require regulatory approval from federal and state authorities prior to construction, including any extensions from or additions to our transmission and storage system. The approval process for

28


storage and transportation projects has become increasingly challenging, due in part to state and local concerns related to unregulated exploration and production and gathering activities in new production areas, including the Marcellus Shale.and Utica Shales, and negative public perception regarding the oil and gas industry. Such authorization may not be granted or, if granted, such authorization may include burdensome or expensive conditions.
 
If we are unable to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, our future growth may be limited, and the acquisitions we do make may reduce, rather than increase, our cash generated from operations on a per unit basis.
Our ability to grow depends, in part, on our ability to make acquisitions that increase our cash generated from operations on a per unit basis. The acquisition component of our strategy is based, in large part, on our expectation of ongoing divestitures of midstream energy assets by industry participants. A material decrease in such divestitures would limit our opportunities for future acquisitions and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
If we are unable to make accretive acquisitions, whether because, among other reasons, (i) we are unable to identify attractive acquisition opportunities, (ii) we are unable to negotiate acceptable purchase contracts, (iii) we are unable to obtain financing for acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, (iv) we are outbid by competitors or (v) we are unable to obtain necessary governmental or third party consents, then our future growth and ability to increase distributions will be limited. Furthermore, even if we do make acquisitions that we believe will be accretive, these acquisitions may nevertheless result in a decrease in the cash generated from operations on a per unit basis.
Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things:

mistaken assumptions about volumes, revenues and costs, including synergies and potential growth;
an inability to secure adequate customer commitments to use the acquired systems or facilities;
an inability to integrate successfully the assets or businesses we acquire;
the assumption of unknown liabilities for which we are not indemnified or for which our indemnity is inadequate;
the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention from other business concerns; and
unforeseen difficulties operating in new geographic areas or business lines.

If any acquisition fails to be accretive to our distributable cash flow per unit, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.

If we are unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms to fund expansions of our asset base, our ability to make quarterly cash distributions may be diminished or our financial leverage could increase. We do not have any commitment with any of our affiliates to provide any direct or indirect financial assistance to us.
 
In order to expand our asset base and complete our announced expansion projects described in this report,Annual Report on Form 10-K, we will need to make expansion capital expenditures. If we do not make sufficient or effective expansion capital expenditures, we will be unable to expand our business operations and may be unable to maintain or raise the level of our quarterly cash distributions. We

Global financial markets and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, volatile, particularly for companies in the oil and gas industry. The current weak economic conditions in the oil and gas industry have made, and will likely continue to make, it difficult for some entities to obtain funding. In order to fund our expansion capital expenditures, we will be required to use cash from our operations, or incur borrowings or sell additional common units or other limited partner interests in order to fund our expansion capital expenditures.interests. Using cash from operations will reduce distributable cash flow to our common unitholders. Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets for future equity or debt offerings may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offering, by the covenants in our debt agreements, general economic conditions and contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. Even if we are successful in obtaining funds for expansion capital expenditures through equity or debt financings, the terms thereof could limit our ability to pay distributions to our common unitholders. In addition, incurring additional debt may significantly increase our interest expense and financial leverage, and issuing additional limited partner interests may result in significant common unitholder dilution and increase the aggregate amount of cash required to maintain the then-current distribution rate, which could materially decrease our ability to pay distributions at the then-current distribution rate. If funding is not available to us when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to execute our business plans, complete acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations,

29


cash flows and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders. We do not have any commitment with our general partner or other affiliates, including EQT and EQGP, to provide any direct or indirect financial assistance to us.
 
We are subject to numerous hazards and operational risks.
 
Our business operations are subject to all of the inherent hazards and risks normally incidental to the gathering, compressing, transportationtransmission and storage of natural gas. These operating risks include, but are not limited to:
 
damage to pipelines, facilities, equipment and surrounding properties caused by hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, floods, fires and other natural disasters and acts of terrorism;

29


inadvertent damage from construction, vehicles, and farm and utility equipment;
uncontrolled releases of natural gas and other hydrocarbons;
leaks, migrations or losses of natural gas as a result of the malfunction of equipment or facilities and, with respect to storage assets, as a result of undefined boundaries, geologic anomalies, natural pressure migration and wellbore migration;
ruptures, fires and explosions; and
other hazards that could also result in personal injury and loss of life, pollution to the environment and suspension of operations.
 
These risks could result in loss of human life, personal injuries, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, impairment of our operations, regulatory investigations and penalties and substantial losses to us. The location of certain segments of our systems in or near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers and industrial sites, could increase the damages resulting from these risks. In spite of any precautions taken, an event such as those described above could cause considerable harm to people or property and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make distributions.quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders. Accidents or other operating risks could further result in loss of service available to our customers. Such circumstances, including those arising from maintenance and repair activities, could result in service interruptions on segments of our systems. Potential customer impacts arising from service interruptions on segments of our systems could include limitations on our ability to satisfy customer requirements, obligations to provide reservation charge credits to customers in times of constrained capacity, and solicitation of our existing customers by others for potential new projects that would compete directly with our existing services. Such circumstances could adversely impact our ability to meet contractual obligations and retain customers, with a resulting negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and on our ability to make quarterly cash distributions to you.our unitholders.
 
We do not insure against all potential losses and could be seriously harmed by unexpected liabilities.
 
We are not fully insured against all risks inherent in our businesses, including environmental accidents that might occur. In addition, we do not maintain business interruption insurance of the types and in amounts necessary to cover all possible risks of loss. The occurrence of any operating risks not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and on our ability to make quarterly cash distributions to you.our unitholders.
 
EQT currently maintains excess liability insurance that covers EQTEQT's and its affiliates,affiliates', including our, legal and contractual liabilities arising out of bodily injury, personal injury or property damage, including resulting loss of use, to third parties. This excess liability insurance includes coverage for sudden and accidental pollution liability but excludes: release of pollutants subsequent to their disposal; release of substances arising from the combustion of fuels that result in acidic deposition; and testing, monitoring, clean-up, containment, treatment or removal of pollutants from property owned, occupied by, rented to, used by or in the care, custody or control of EQT and its affiliates.

EQT also maintains coverage for itself and its affiliates, including us, for physical damage to assets and resulting business interruption, including damage caused by terrorist acts.
 
All of EQT’s insurance is subject to deductibles. If a significant accident or event occurs for which we are not fully insured, it could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. We may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the types and in the amounts we desire at reasonable rates, and we may elect to self-insure a portion of our asset portfolio. The insurance coverage we do obtain may contain large deductibles or fail to cover certain hazards or cover all potential losses. In addition, we share insurance coverage with EQT, for which we will reimburse EQT pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement. To the extent EQT experiences covered losses under the insurance policies, the limit of our coverage for potential losses may be reduced.

30


 
We are subject to stringent environmental laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities.
 
Our operations are regulated extensively at the federal, state and local levels.  Laws, regulations and other legal requirements have increased the cost to plan, design, install, operate and abandon transmission and gathering systems and pipelines.  Environmental, health and safety legal requirements govern discharges of substances into the air and water; the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes; the clean-up of contaminated sites; groundwater quality and availability; plant and wildlife protection; locations available for pipeline construction; environmental impact studies and assessments prior to permitting; restoration of properties after construction or operations are completed; pipeline safety (including replacement requirements); and work practices related to employee health and safety.  Compliance with the laws, regulations and other legal requirements applicable to our businesses, including delays in obtaining permits or other government approvals, may increase our costcosts of doing business, or result in delays or restrictions in the performance of operations due to the need to obtain additional or more detailed permits or other governmental approvals or even cause us not to pursue a project.  For example, the U.S. Fish and permits.  TheseWildlife Service announced in 2015 that it will consider hundreds of additional species for listing as endangered or threatened as a result of several litigation settlements. Some of the species that may ultimately be listed may be located in areas in which we operate. Such designations of previously unprotected species as being endangered or threatened, or the designation of previously unprotected areas as a critical habitat for such species, can result in increased costs, construction delays, restrictions in our operations or abandonment of projects. In addition, compliance with laws, regulations or other legal requirements could also subject us to claims for personal injuries, property damage and other damages. 

30


Our failure to comply with the laws, regulations and other legal requirements applicable to our businesses, even if as a result of factors beyond our control, could result in the suspension or termination of our operations and subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties and damages.
 
Laws, regulations and other legal requirements are constantly changing, and implementation of compliant processes in response to such changes could be costly and time consuming.  For example, during August and September 2015, the EPA published a suite of regulatory proposals aimed at reducing methane and VOC emissions across the entire oil and gas sector. These actions are part of a larger climate action plan, which focuses primarily on reducing GHG emissions from the power and oil and gas sectors. In addition, on October 1, 2015, the EPA revised the NAAQS for ozone from 75 parts per billion for the current 8 hour primary and secondary ozone standards to 70 parts per billion for both standards. Compliance with these or other new regulations could, among other things, require installation of new emission controls on some of our equipment, result in longer permitting timelines, and significantly increase our capital expenditures and operating costs, which could adversely impact our business. In addition to periodic changes to air, water and waste laws, as well as recent EPA initiatives to impose climate change-based air regulations on industry, the U.S. Congress and various states have been evaluating climate-related legislation and other regulatory initiatives that would further restrict emissions of greenhouse gases, including methane (a primary component of natural gas) and carbon dioxide (a byproduct of burning natural gas). Such restrictions may result in additional compliance obligations with respect to, or taxes on the release, capture and use of greenhouse gases that could have an adverse effect on our operations.
 
These laws and regulations may impose numerous obligations that are applicable to our operations, including the acquisition of permits to conduct regulated activities, the incurrence of capital or operating expenditures to limit or prevent releases of materials from our pipelines and facilities, and the imposition of substantial liabilities and remedial obligations for pollution resulting from our operations. Numerous governmental authorities, such as the EPA and analogous state agencies, have the power to enforce compliance with these laws and regulations and the permits issued under them, oftentimes requiring difficult and costly corrective actions. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and permits may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial obligations and the issuance of injunctions limiting or preventing some or all of our operations. In addition, we may experience a delay in obtaining or be unable to obtain required permits or regulatory authorizations, which may cause us to lose potential and current customers, interrupt our operations, abandon projects and limit our growth and revenue. There is a risk that we may incur costs and liabilities in connection with our operations due to historical industry operations and waste disposal practices, our handling of wastes and potential emissions and discharges related to our operations. Private parties, including the owners of the properties through which our transmission and storage system or our gathering systemsystems pass and facilities where our wastes are taken for reclamation or disposal, may have the right to pursue legal actions to require remediation of contamination or enforce compliance with environmental requirements as well as to seek damages for personal injury or property damage. Pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement, EQT will indemnify us for certain potential environmental and toxic tort claims, losses and expenses associated with the operation of the assets acquired by us and occurring before the closing date of theour IPO. However, the maximum liability of EQT for these indemnification obligations will not exceed $15 million, which may not be sufficient to fully compensate us for such claims, losses and expenses. In addition, changes in environmental laws occur frequently, and any such changes that result in more stringent and costly waste handling, storage, transport, disposal or remediation requirements could

31


have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders. We may not be able to recover all or any of these costs from insurance.
 
Climate change and related legislation, regulatory initiatives and litigation could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the natural gas services we provide.
 
Legislative and regulatory measures to address climate change and GHG emissions are in various phases of discussion or implementation. The EPA regulates GHG emissions from new and modified facilities that are potential major sources of criteria pollutants under the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V programs. In addition, on January 14, 2015, the Obama Administration announced its goal to significantly reduce methane emissions from oil and gas sources by 2025. As part ofFollowing this announcement, during August and September 2015, the EPA announcedpublished a suite of regulatory proposals that it will issue a proposed rule in the summer of 2015 and a final rule in 2016 settingset standards for methane and VOC emissions from newthe power and modified oil and gas production sources and natural gas processing and transmission sources.sectors. PHMSA has also stated that it will proposeis considering natural gas pipeline safety standards that could result in 2015 that are expected to lowerlowering methane emissions.

The U.S. Congress, along with federal and state agencies, have considered measures to reduce the emissions of GHGs. Legislation or regulation that restricts carbon emissions could increase our cost of environmental compliance by requiring us to install new equipment to reduce emissions from larger facilities and/or, depending on any future legislation, purchase emission allowances. Climate change and greenhouse gas legislation or regulation could also delay or otherwise negatively affect efforts to obtain permits and other regulatory approvals for existing and new facilities, impose additional monitoring and reporting requirements or adversely affect demand for the natural gas we transport, store and gather. For example, while the EPA has had rules in effect since 2011 that require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain petroleum and natural gas sources in the United States, including among others, onshore processing, transmission and storage facilities, only recently, in December 2014,October 2015, the agency proposedfinalized changes to this reporting rule that would expand the petroleum and natural gas system sources for which annual GHG emissions reporting is currently required to include, beginning in the 2016 reporting year, certain onshore gathering and boosting systems consisting primarily of gathering pipelines, compressors and processing equipment used to perform natural gas compression, dehydration and acid gas removal activities.activities and blowdowns of natural gas transmission pipelines. Conversely, legislation or

31


regulation that sets a price on or otherwise restricts carbon emissions could also benefit the Partnershipus by increasing demand for natural gas because the combustion of natural gas results in substantially fewer carbon emissions per Btu of heat generated than other fossil fuels such as coal. The effect on us of any new legislative or regulatory measures will depend on the particular provisions that are ultimately adopted.
 
Significant portions of our pipeline systems have been in service for several decades. There could be unknown events or conditions or increased maintenance or repair expenses and downtime associated with our pipelines that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make distributions.
 
Significant portions of our transmission and storage system and ourFERC-regulated gathering system have been in service for several decades. The age and condition of ourthese systems could result in increased maintenance or repair expenditures, and any downtime associated with increased maintenance and repair activities could materially reduce our revenue. Any significant increase in maintenance and repair expenditures or loss of revenue due to the age or condition of our systems could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and our ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of pipeline integrity management program testing and related repairs.
 
Pursuant to the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002, as reauthorized and amended by the Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement and Safety Act of 2006, the DOT has adopted regulations requiring pipeline operators to develop integrity management programs for transmission pipelines located where a leak or rupture could harm “high consequence areas,” including high population areas, unless the operator effectively demonstrates by risk assessment that the pipeline could not affect the area. The regulations require operators, including us, to:
 
perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity;
identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline segments that could impact a high consequence area;
maintain processes for data collection, integration and analysis;
repair and remediate pipelines as necessary; and
implement preventive and mitigating actions.
 

32


Changes to pipeline safety laws and regulations that result in more stringent or costly safety standards could have a significant adverse effect on us and similarly situated midstream operators.  For example, in August 2011, PHMSA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking in which the agency was seeking public comment on a number of changes to regulations governing the safety of gas transmission pipelines and gathering lines, including, for example, revising the definitions of “high consequence areas” and “gathering lines” and strengthening integrity management requirements as they apply to existing regulated operators and to currently exempt operators should certain exemptions be removed. Most recently, in an August 2014 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report to the U.S. Congress, the GAO acknowledged PHMSA’s August 2011 proposed rulemaking as well as PHMSA’s continued assessment of the safety risks posed by these gathering lines as part of rulemaking process, and recommended that PHMSA move forward with rulemaking to address larger-diameter, higher-pressurehigher pressure gathering lines, including subjecting such pipelines to emergency response planning requirements that currently do not apply. In 2015, PHMSA published a final rule making miscellaneous changes to the pipeline safety regulations to address, among other things, the performance of post-construction inspections and leak surveys for certain onshore gas gathering pipelines.

 On September 25, 2013, the PHMSA released a final rule increasing the civil penalty maximums for pipeline safety violations. The rule increased the maximum penalties from $100,000 to $200,000 per day for each violation, and from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 for a related series of violations. Additionally, PHMSA issued an Advisory Bulletin in May 2012, which advised pipeline operators of changes in annual reporting requirements.  The bulletin also advised operators that if they rely on design, construction, inspection, testing or other data to determine the pressures at which their pipelines should operate, the records of that data must be traceable, verifiable and complete. In the absence of any such records, the bulletin advised that operators should verify maximum pressures through physical testing or modify/replace facilities to meet the demands of such pressures.  As required by the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011, the Partnershipwe verified itsour records for all applicable pipeline segments and submitted a report to DOT identifying each pipeline segment for which records were insufficient.
 
States are generally preempted by federal law in the area of pipeline safety, but state agencies may qualify to assume responsibility for enforcing federal regulations over intrastate pipeline regulations.pipelines.  They may also promulgate additive pipeline safety regulations provided that the state standards are at least as stringent as the federal standards. Although many of our natural gas facilities fall within a class that is not subject to integrity management requirements, we may incur significant costs and liabilities associated with repair, remediation, preventive or mitigation measures associated with our non-exempt pipelines, particularly our gatheringtransmission pipelines. This estimate does not include theThe costs, if any, for repair, remediation, preventive or mitigating actions that may be determined to be necessary as a result of the testing program, which could be

32


substantial. Such costs and liabilities might relate to repair, remediation, preventive or mitigating actions that may be determined to be necessary as a result of the testing program, as well as lost cash flows resulting from shutting down our pipelines during the pendency of such repairs. Additionally, shouldactions, could be material.

Should we fail to comply with DOT regulations, we could be subject to penalties and fines. In addition, we may be required to comply with new safety regulations and make additional maintenance capital expenditures in the future for similar regulatory compliance initiatives that are not reflected in our forecasted maintenance capital expenditures.
 
The adoption of legislation relating to hydraulic fracturing and the enactment of new or increased severance taxes and impact fees on natural gas wellsproduction could cause our current and potential customers to reduce the number of wells they drill in the Marcellus Shale.and Utica Shales or curtail production of existing wells. If drilling reductions are significant for those or other reasons, the reductions would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
Our assets are primarily located in the Marcellus Shale fairway in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia and a majority of the production that we receive from customers is produced from wells completed using hydraulic fracturing. Hydraulic fracturing is an important and commonly used process in the completion of oil and gas wells, particularly in unconventional resource plays like the Marcellus Shale.and Utica Shales. Hydraulic fracturing is typically regulated by state oil and gas commissions and similar agencies, but several federal agencies have asserted regulatory authority over aspects of the process, including the EPA, which plans to proposepublished proposed effluent limit guidelines in the first half ofon April 7, 2015 for waste water from shale gas extraction operations before being discharged to a treatment plant, and the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which proposed regulations in May 2013 applicable toissued a final rule on March 20, 2015 that established new or more stringent standards for performing hydraulic fracturing conducted on federal and Indian oillands including, among other things, submission of various detailed notices, plans and natural gas leasesother information relating to the fracturing activities that are subject to BLM pre-approval, implementation of measures designed to protect usable water from fracturing activities, and public disclosure of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids through the FracFocus website. The BLM rule had an expected effective date of June 2015 but is expectedcurrently subject to issueseveral ongoing legal challenges that seek to block implementation of the rule.  Additionally, in September 2015, the U.S. District Court of Wyoming issued a finalpreliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of the rule in the first half of 2015.  In addition,while litigation is pending. The U.S. Congress has from time to time considered the adoption of legislation to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing, while a growing

33


number of states, including those in which we operate, have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations that could impose more stringent disclosure and/or well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations. Some states, such as Pennsylvania, have imposed fees on the drilling of new unconventional oil and gas wells. States could elect to prohibit hydraulic fracturing altogether, as was announced in December 2014 with regard to fracturing activities in New York.  Also, local governments may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the time, place and manner of drilling activities in general or hydraulic fracturing activities in particular. In fact, legislation or regulation banning hydraulic fracturing has been adopted in a number of local jurisdictions, including ones in which we have limited operations. Further, several federal governmental agencies are conducting reviews and studies on the environmental aspects of hydraulic fracturing, including the EPA, which is planning to issuein June 2015 issued a draft of its final report on the effects of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resourcesresources.  The draft report did not find evidence of widespread systematic impacts to drinking water, but did find a relatively small number of site-specific impacts. A final report is expected in the first half of 2015.2016. The results of such review or studies could spur initiatives to further regulate hydraulic fracturing.  The adoption of new laws, regulations or ordinances at the federal, state or local levels imposing more stringent restrictions on hydraulic fracturing could make it more difficult for our customers to complete natural gas wells, increase our customers’ costs of compliance and doing business, and otherwise adversely affect the hydraulic fracturing services they perform, which could negatively impact demand for our gathering, storage and transportationtransmission services. In addition,

Furthermore, the tax laws, rules and regulations that affect our customers such asare subject to change. For example, Pennsylvania’s governor and legislature have continued to discuss the imposition of or increase ina state severance taxes (a tax on the extraction of natural resources)resources, including natural gas produced from the Marcellus and Utica Shale formations, either in statesreplacement of or in which they produce gas, could change.addition to the existing state impact fee. A consensus on the characteristics, such as the effective tax rate, or enactment of a state severance tax has yet to be reached. Any such increase or change could adversely impact our customers’ earnings, cash flows and financial position and cause them to reduce their drilling in the areas in which we operate.
 
We are exposed to costs associated with fuel usage and other requirements.
A certain amount of natural gas is utilized in connection with its transportation across a pipeline system and under our contractual arrangements with our customers we are entitled to retain a specified volume of natural gas in order to compensate us for such fuel usage and other requirements. The level of fuel usage and other requirements on our gathering system may exceed the natural gas volumes retained from our customers as compensation for our fuel usage and other requirements pursuant to our contractual agreements. In this case it will be necessary for us to purchase natural gas in the market to make up for the difference, which exposes us to commodity price risk. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, our actual commodity usage volumes exceeded the amounts recovered from our gathering customers for which we recognized $1.6 million, $3.3 million and $4.0 million of purchased gas cost as a component of operating and maintenance expense in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Future exposure to the volatility of natural gas prices as a result of gas imbalances could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
Our exposure to direct commodity price risk may increase in the future.
 
Although we intend to enter into fixed-feelong-term firm contracts with new customers in the future, our efforts to obtain such contractual terms may not be successful. In addition, we may acquire or develop additional midstream assets in the future that

33


do not provide services primarily based on capacity reservation charges or other fixed fee arrangements and therefore have a greater exposure to fluctuations in commodity price risk than our current operations. Future exposure to the volatility of natural gas prices, including regional basis differentials, as a result of our future contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities are located, which could disrupt our operations.
 
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities have been constructed, and we are therefore subject to the possibility of more onerous terms and/or increased costs to retain necessary land use if we do not have valid rights-of-way, if such rights-of-way lapse or terminate or if our facilities are not properly located within the boundaries of such rights-of-way. Although many of these rights are perpetual in nature, we occasionally obtain the rights to construct and operate our pipelines on land owned by third parties and governmental agencies for a specific period of time. If we were to be unsuccessful in renegotiating rights-of-way, we might have to institute condemnation proceedings on our FERC regulatedFERC-regulated assets or relocate our facilities for non-regulated assets. A loss of rights-of-way or a relocation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and on our ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
Any significant and prolonged change in or stabilization of natural gas prices could have a negative impact on our natural gas storage business.
 
Historically, natural gas prices have been seasonal and volatile, which has enhanced demand for our storage services. The natural gas storage business has benefited from significant price fluctuations resulting from seasonal price sensitivity, which impacts the level of demand for our services and the rates we are able to charge for such services. On a system-wide basis, natural gas is typically injected into storage between April and October when natural gas prices are generally lower and withdrawn during the winter months of November through March when natural gas prices are typically higher. However, the market for natural gas may not continue to experience volatility and seasonal price sensitivity in the future at the levels previously seen. If volatility and seasonality in the natural gas industry decrease, because of increased production capacity or otherwise, the demand for our storage services and the prices that we will be able to charge for those services may decline.
 
In addition to volatility and seasonality, an extended period of high natural gas prices would increase the cost of acquiring base gas and likely place upward pressure on the costs of associated storage expansion activities. For instance, the settlement approved by the FERC in our most recent rate case included a provision allowing us to recover 7.1 Bcf of storage base gas through our transmission fuel retention percentage. Under the Settlement related to the PSCT, the transmission fuel

34


retention percentage was reduced from 3.72% to 2.72% effective April 1, 2013. The Settlement also eliminated the tracking mechanism that related to the recovery of 7.1 Bcf of storage base gas. To the extent we need to replace storage base gas under the terms of the Settlement, we may not be able to recover the cost of acquiring such base gas from our customers and will be subject to commodity price risk. An extended period of low natural gas prices could adversely impact storage values for some period of time until market conditions adjust. These commodity price impacts could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make distributions.quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
We have entered into a joint venture, and may in the future enter into additional or modify existing joint ventures, that might restrict our operational and corporate flexibility.

We have entered into, and may in the future enter into additional, joint venture arrangements with third parties. Joint venture arrangements may restrict our operational and corporate flexibility. Moreover, joint venture arrangements involve various risks and uncertainties, such as committing us to fund operating and/or capital expenditures, the timing and amount of which we may not control, and our joint venture partners may not satisfy their financial obligations to the joint venture.

Restrictions inunder our credit facilitydebt agreements could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
We maintain a credit facility with a syndicate of lenders. Our credit facility containsdebt agreements contain various covenants and restrictive provisions that limit our ability to, among other things:
 
incur or guarantee additional debt;
make distributions on or redeem or repurchase units;
make certain investments and acquisitions;
incur certain liens or permit them to exist;
enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates;
merge or consolidate with another company; and
transfer, sell or otherwise dispose of assets.
 
Our credit facility also contains a covenant requiring us to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of not more than 5.00 to 1.00 (or, not more than 5.50 to 1.00 for certain measurement periods following the consummation of certain acquisitions). Our ability to meet these covenants can be affected by events beyond our control and we cannot assure our unitholders that we will meet these covenants. In addition, our credit facility contains events of default customary for such facilities, including the occurrence of a change of control (which will occur if EQT fails to control our general partner, we fail to own 100% of Equitrans, L.P., or our general partner fails to be ourthe general partner).

34


The provisions of our credit facilitydebt agreements may affect our ability to obtain future financing and pursue attractive business opportunities and our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changes in business conditions. In addition, a failure to comply with the provisions of our credit facilitydebt agreements could result in an event of default, which could enable our lenders to, subject to the terms and conditions of the credit facility,applicable agreement, declare any outstanding principal of that debt, together with accrued and unpaid interest, to be immediately due and payable. If the payment of our debt is accelerated, our assets may be insufficient to repay such debt in full, and our unitholders could experience a partial or total loss of their investment. The credit facility also has cross default provisions that apply to any other indebtedness we may have with an aggregate principal amount in excess of $15.0 million.
 
Our future debt levels may limit our flexibility to obtain financing and to pursue other business opportunities.
 
We have the ability to incur debt, subject to limitations in our credit facility. Our level of debt could have important consequences to us, including the following:
 
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available on favorable terms;
our funds available for operations, future business opportunities and distributions to unitholders will be reduced by that portion of our cash flow required to make interest payments on our debt;
we may be more vulnerable to competitive pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy generally; and
our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions may be limited.
 
Our ability to service our debt will depend upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If our operating results are not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced

35


to take actions such as reducing distributions, reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets or seeking additional equity capital. We may not be able to effect any of these actions on satisfactory terms or at all.
 
The credit and risk profile of our general partner and its owner, EQT could adversely affect our credit ratings and risk profile, which could increase our borrowing costs or hinder our ability to raise capital.
 
The credit and business risk profiles of our general partner and EQT may be factors considered in credit evaluations of us. This is because our general partner, which is ownedcontrolled by EQT through EQT’s ownership interest in EQGP, controls our business activities, including our cash distribution policy and growth strategy. Any adverse change inDue to our relationship with EQT, our ability to access the capital markets, or the pricing or other terms of any capital markets transactions, may be adversely affected by any impairments to EQT’s financial condition, of EQT, including the degree of its financial leverage and its dependence on cash flowflows from usEQGP to service its indebtedness, or adverse changes in its credit ratings, including a downgrade of EQT’s investment grade credit rating. A sustained period of lower commodity prices could increase the risk of a lower credit rating may adverselyfor EQT and EQM. On December 16, 2015, Moody's Investors Services (Moody's) announced that it had placed 29 U.S. exploration and production companies, including EQT, under review for a downgrade due to the low commodity price environment. On January 25, 2016, Moody’s also announced that it had placed three midstream partnerships, including EQM, under review for a downgrade primarily due to their affiliations with sponsoring exploration and production companies. Any material limitations on our ability to access capital as a result of adverse changes at EQT could limit our ability to obtain future financing under favorable terms, or at all, or could result in increased financing costs in the future. Similarly, material adverse changes at EQT could negatively impact our unit price, limiting our ability to raise capital through equity issuances or debt financing, could negatively affect our credit ratingsability to engage in, expand or pursue our business activities, and risk profile.
We may enter into joint venturescould also prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might restrict our operational and corporate flexibility.otherwise be considered beneficial to us.

We may from timePlease see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in EQT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (which is not, and shall not be deemed to time enter into joint venture arrangementsbe, incorporated by reference herein) for a full discussion of the risks associated with third parties. Joint venture arrangements may restrict our operational and corporate flexibility. Moreover, joint venture arrangements involve various risks and uncertainties, such as committing us to fund operating and/or capital expenditures, the timing and amount of which we may not control, and our joint venture partners may not satisfy their financial obligations to the joint venture.EQT’s business.

A downgrade of our credit ratings, which are determined by independent third parties, could impact our liquidity, our access to capital, and our costs of doing business.

A downgrade ofIf any credit rating agency downgrades our credit ratings, mightour access to credit markets may be limited, our borrowing costs could increase, and we may be required to provide additional credit assurances in support of commercial agreements, such as joint venture agreements and construction contracts, the amount of which may be substantial. Our credit rating by Moody’s as of February 10, 2016 of Ba1, which as described above was under review for a downgrade as of January 25, 2016, is considered non-investment grade and may result in greater borrowing costs and collateral requirements than would be available to us if all our cost of borrowing, negatively impacting our liquidity and diminishing our financial results. In addition ourcredit ratings were investment grade. Our ability to access capital markets could also be limited by a downgrade of our credit ratings as well as by economic, market or other disruptions. An increase in the level of our indebtedness in the future may result in a downgrade in the ratings that are assigned to our debt. See "The credit and risk profile of our general partner and EQT could adversely affect our credit ratings and risk profile, which could increase our borrowing costs or hinder our ability to raise capital," above.

Credit rating agencies perform an independent analysis when assigning credit ratings. This analysis includes a number of criteria such as business composition, market and operational risks, as well as various financial tests. Credit rating agencies continue to review the criteria for industry sectors and various debt ratings and may make changes to those criteria from time to time. Credit ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the ratings agencies.


35


Increases in interest rates could adversely impact demand for our storage capacity, our unit price, our ability to issue equity or incur debt for acquisitions or other purposes and our ability to make cash distributions at our intended levels.
 
There is a financing cost for our customers to store natural gas in our storage facilities. That financing cost is impacted by the cost of capital or interest rates incurred by the customer in addition to the commodity cost of the natural gas in inventory. Absent other factors, a higher financing cost adversely impacts the economics of storing natural gas for future sale. As a result, a significant increase in interest rates could adversely affect the demand for our storage capacity independent of other market factors.
 
In addition, interest rates on future credit facilities and debt securities could be higher than current levels, causing our financing costs to increase. As with other yield-oriented securities, our unit price is impacted by the level of our cash distributions and implied distribution yield. The distribution yield is often used by investors to compare and rank yield-oriented securities for investment decision-making purposes. Therefore, changes in interest rates, either positive or negative, may affect

36


the yield requirements of investors who invest in our units, and a rising interest rate environment could have an adverse impact on our unit price, our ability to issue equity or incur debt for acquisitions or other purposes and our ability to make cash distributions at our intended levels.
 
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to unitholders depends primarily on our cash flow rather than on our profitability, which may prevent us from making distributions, even during periods in which we record net income.
 
The amount of cash we have available for distribution depends primarily upon our cash flow and not solely on profitability, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make cash distributions during periods when we record losses for financial accounting purposes and may not make cash distributions during periods when we record net earnings for financial accounting purposes.

We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of natural gas reserves connected to our systems. Accordingly, we do not have independent estimates of total reserves connected to our systems or the anticipated life of such reserves. If the total reserves or estimated life of the reserves connected to our systems are less than we anticipate, or the timeline for the development of reserves is longer than we anticipate, and we are unable to secure additional sources of natural gas, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and our ability to make quarterly cash distributions to our unitholders.
 
The lack of diversification of our assets and geographic locations could adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
 
We rely exclusively on revenues generated from transmission, storage and gathering systems, which are exclusivelyprimarily located in the Appalachian Basin in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Due to our lack of diversification in assets and geographic location, an adverse development in these businesses or our areas of operations, including adverse developments due to catastrophic events, weather, regulatory action and decreases in demand for natural gas, could have a significantly greater impact on our results of operations and distributable cash flow to our unitholders than if we maintained more diverse assets and locations.

Terrorist or cyber security attacks or threats thereof aimed at our facilities or surrounding areas could adversely affect our business.
 
Our business hasbusinesses have become increasingly dependent upon digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications, to operate our businesses, and the maintenance of our financial and other records has long been dependent upon such technologies. The U.S. government has issued public warnings that indicate that energy assets might be specific targets of cyber security threats. Deliberate attacks on, or unintentional events affecting, our systems or infrastructure, the systems or infrastructure of third parties or the cloud could lead to corruption or loss of our proprietary data and potentially sensitive data, delays in delivery of natural gas and NGLs,natural gas liquids, difficulty in completing and settling transactions, challenges in maintaining our books and records, environmental damage, communication interruptions, personal injury, property damage, other operational disruptions and third party liability.  Further, as cyber incidents continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to cyber incidents.
 

36


Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
 
EQT, through its control of EQGP, controls our general partner, which has sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our operations. Potential conflicts of interest may arise among our general partner, its affiliates and us. Our general partner andhas limited its affiliates, including EQT, have conflicts of interest with us and limitedstate law fiduciary duties to us and our unitholders, and theywhich may permit it to favor theirits own interests to the detriment of us and our other common unitholders.
 
EQT, indirectly owns andthrough its ownership of EQGP, controls our general partner and appointedhas the power to appoint all of the officers and directors of our general partner. All of the officers and a majority of the directors of our general partner are also officers and/or directors of EQT. Although our general partner has a duty to manage us in a manner that is beneficial to us and our unitholders, the directors and officers of our general partner have a fiduciary duty to manage our general partner in a manner that is beneficial to EQT. Conflicts of interest will arise betweenamong EQT, EQGP, EQGP’s general partner and our general partner, on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. In resolving these conflicts of interest, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of EQT and EQGP over our interests and the interests of our unitholders. These conflicts include the following situations, among others:
 
Neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires EQT to pursue a business strategy that favors us, and the directors and officers of EQT have a fiduciary duty to make these decisions in the best interests of

37


EQT, which may be contrary to our interests. EQT may choose to shift the focus of its investment and growth to areas not served by our assets.
EQT, as our primary customer, has an economic incentive to cause us not to seek higher tariff rates or gathering fees, even if such higher rates or fees would reflect rates and fees that could be obtained in arms length, third party transaction.transactions.
EQT is not limited in its ability to compete with us and may offer business opportunities or sell midstream assets to third parties without first offering us the right to bid for them.
Our general partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us, such as EQT, in resolving conflicts of interest.interest, which has the effect of limiting its state law fiduciary duty to our unitholders.
All of the officers and a majority of the directors of our general partner are also officers and/or directors of EQT and owe fiduciary duties to EQT.EQT, and four of the officers and three of the directors of our general partner are also officers and/or directors of EQGP’s general partner and owe fiduciary duties to EQM. The officers of our general partner also devote significant time to the business of EQT and EQM and are compensated by EQT accordingly.
Our general partner determines whether or not we incur debt and that decision may affect our credit ratings.
Our partnership agreement replaces the fiduciary duties that would otherwise be owed by our general partner with contractual standards governing its duties, limits our general partner’s liabilities and restricts the remedies available to our unitholders for actions that, without such limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.duty under state law.
Except in limited circumstances, our general partner has the power and authority to conduct our business without unitholder approval.
Our general partner controls the enforcement of the obligations that it and its affiliates owe to us, including EQT’s obligations under our omnibus agreement with EQT and EQT’s commercial agreements with us.
Disputes may arise under our commercial agreements with EQT and its affiliates.
Our partnership agreement gives our general partner broad discretion in establishing financial reserves for the proper conduct of our business. These reserves will affect the amount of cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset purchases and sales, borrowings, issuanceissuances of additional partnership securities and the creation, reduction or increase of reserves, each of which can affect the amount of distributable cash flow.available for distribution to our unitholders.
Our general partner determines the amount and timing of any capital expenditures and whether a capital expenditure is classified as a maintenance capital expenditure, which reduces operating surplus, or an expansion or investment capital expenditure, which does not reduce operating surplus. This determination can affect the amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders and the ability of the subordinated units to convert to common units.unitholders.
Our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and its affiliates are reimbursable by us.
Our general partner may cause us to borrow funds in order to permit the payment of cash distributions, even if the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make a distribution on the subordinated units, to make incentive distributions or to accelerate the expiration of the subordination period.distributions.
Our partnership agreement permits us to classify up to $30 million as operating surplus, even if it is generated from asset sales, non-working capital borrowings or other sources that would otherwise constitute capital surplus. This cash may be used to fund distributions on our subordinated or general partner units or to our general partner in respect of the incentive distribution rights.general partner interest or the IDRs.
Our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services rendered to us or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf.
Our general partner intends to limit its liability regarding our contractual and other obligations.
Our general partner may exercise its right to call and purchase all of theour common units not owned by it and its affiliates if they own more than 80% of the common units.
Our general partner controls the enforcement of the obligations that it and its affiliates owe to us, including EQT’s obligations under the omnibus agreement and its commercial agreements with us.
Our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel, accountants or others to perform services for us.
Our general partner may transfer its incentive distribution rightsthe IDRs without unitholder approval.

37


Our general partner may elect to cause us to issue common units to it in connection with a resetting of the target distribution levels related to our general partner’s incentive distribution rightsIDRs without the approval of the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general partner or our unitholders. This election may result in lower distributions to our common unitholders in certain situations.

Please read Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The duties of our general partner’s officers and directors may conflict with their duties as officers and/or directors of EQT and/or EQGP’s general partner.


38


Our general partner’s officers and other affiliatesdirectors have duties to manage our business in a manner beneficial to us, our unitholders and the owner of our general partner, EQGP, which is controlled by EQT. However, a majority of our general partner’s directors and three of its officers are also officers and/or directors of EQGP’s general partner, which has duties to manage the business of EQGP in a manner beneficial to EQGP and EQGP’s unitholders, including EQT. Additionally, a majority of our general partner’s officers and all of its officers are also officers and/or directors of EQT. Consequently, these directors and officers may encounter situations in which their obligations to EQGP and/or EQT, as applicable, on the one hand, and us, on the other hand, are in conflict. The resolution of these conflicts may not restrictedalways be in our best interest or that of our unitholders.

In addition, our general partner’s officers, all of whom are also officers of EQT and three of whom are officers of EQGP’s general partner, will have responsibility for overseeing the allocation of their own time and time spent by administrative personnel on our behalf and on behalf of EQGP and/or EQT. These officers face conflicts regarding these time allocations that may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

EQT may compete with us, which could adversely affect our ability to compete with us.grow and our results of operations and cash available for distribution.
 
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will be restricted from engaging in any business activities other than acting as our general partner and those activities incidental to its ownership of interests in us. Affiliates of our general partner, including EQT and its other subsidiaries, including EQGP, are not prohibited from owning assets or engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. EQT currently holds interests in, and may make investments in and purchases of, entities that acquire, own and operate other natural gas midstream assets. EQT will be under no obligation to make any acquisition opportunities available to us. Moreover, while EQT may offer us the opportunity to buy additional assets from it, it is under no contractual obligation to accept any offer we might make with respect to such opportunity.

Pursuant to the terms of our partnership agreement, the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any analogous doctrine, does not apply to our general partner or any of its affiliates, including its executive officers and directors, EQT and EQT.EQGP. Any such person or entity that becomes aware of a potential transaction, agreement, arrangement or other matter that may be an opportunity for us will not have any duty to communicate or offer such opportunity to us. Any such person or entity will not be liable to us or to any limited partner for breach of any fiduciary duty or other duty by reason of the fact that such person or entity pursues or acquires such opportunity for itself, directs such opportunity to another person or entity or does not communicate such opportunity or information to us. This may create actual and potential conflicts of interest between us and affiliates of our general partner and result in less than favorable treatment of us and our common unitholders.
 
Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our available cash, which could limit our ability to grow and make acquisitions.
 
We expect that we will distribute all of our available cash to our unitholders and will rely primarily upon external financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund our acquisitions and expansion capital expenditures. As a result, to the extent we are unable to finance growth externally, our cash distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to grow.
 
In addition, because we intend to distribute all of our available cash, our growth may not be as fast as that of businesses that reinvest their available cash to expand ongoing operations. To the extent we issue additional units in connection with any acquisitions or expansion capital expenditures, the payment of distributions on those additional units may increase the risk that we will be unable to maintain or increase our per unit distribution level. There are no limitations in our partnership agreement, and we do not anticipate there being limitations in our credit facility, on our ability to issue additional units, including units ranking senior to the common units. The incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to finance our growth strategy would result in increased interest expense, which in turn may impact the available cash that we have to distribute to our unitholders.
 
The NYSE does not require a publicly traded partnership like us to comply with certain of its corporate governance requirements.
 
Unlike most corporations, we are not required by NYSE rules to have, and we do not intend to have, a majority of independent directors on our general partner’s board of directors or a compensation committee or a nominating and corporate governance committee. Additionally, any future issuance of additional common units or other securities, including to affiliates, will not be subject to the NYSE’s shareholder approval rules. Accordingly, unitholders will not have the same protections afforded to certain corporations that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

39


 
If any of our unitholders are not eligible taxable holders, such unitholders will not be entitled to allocations of income or loss or distributions or voting rights on their common units and their common units will be subject to redemption.
 
In order to avoid any material adverse effect on the maximum applicable rates that can be charged to customers by our subsidiaries on assets that are subject to rate regulation by the FERC or analogous regulatory body, we have adopted certain requirements regarding those investors who may own our common units. Eligible taxable holders are defined in our partnership agreement and generally include any individual or entity (i) whose, or whose owners’, U.S. federal income tax status (or lack of proof thereof) does not have or is not reasonably likely to have, as determined by our general partner, a material adverse effect on the rates that can be charged to customers with respect to assets that are subject to regulation by the FERC or similar

38


regulatory body; or (ii) as to whom our general partner cannot make the determination in clause (i) above, if our general partner determines that it is in our best interest to permit such individual or entity to own our partnership interests. If any of our unitholders fail to fit the requirements of an eligible taxable holder or fail to certify or has falsely certified that such holder is an eligible taxable holder, such unitholder will not receive allocations of income or loss or distributions or voting rights on their units and they run the risk of having their units redeemed by us at the market price calculated in accordance with our partnership agreement as of the date of redemption. The redemption price will be paid in cash or by delivery of a promissory note, as determined by our general partner.
 
Our partnership agreement replaces our general partner’s fiduciary duties to holders of our common units with contractual standards governing its duties.
 
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that eliminate the fiduciary standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held by state fiduciary duty law and replace those duties with several different contractual standards. For example, our partnership agreement permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner, free of any duties to us and our unitholders other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which means that a court will enforce the reasonable expectations of the partners where the language in the partnership agreement does not provide for a clear course of action. This provision entitles our general partner to consider only the interests and factors that it desires and relieves it of any duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, us, our affiliates or our limited partners. Examples of decisions that our general partner may make in its individual capacity include:
 
how to allocate corporate opportunities among us and its affiliates;
whether to exercise its limited call right;
whether to seek approval of the resolution of a conflict of interest by the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general partner;
how to exercise its voting rights with respect to the units it owns;
whether to elect to reset target distribution levels;
whether to transfer the incentive distribution rightsIDRs or any units it owns to a third party; and
whether or not to consent to any merger, consolidation or conversion of the partnership or amendment to the partnership agreement.
 
By purchasing a common unit, a common unitholder agrees to become bound by the provisions in the partnership agreement, including the above provisions.
 
Our partnership agreement restricts the remedies available to holders of our common units for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
 
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that restrict the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership agreement provides that:
 
whenever our general partner, the board of directors of our general partner or any committee thereof (including the conflicts committee) makes a determination or takes, or declines to take, any other action in their respective capacities, our general partner, the board of directors of our general partner and any committee thereof (including the conflicts committee), as applicable, is required to make such determination, or take or decline to take such other action, in good faith, meaning that it subjectively believed that the decision was in the best interests of our partnership, and, except as specifically provided by our partnership agreement, will not be subject to any other or different standard imposed by our partnership agreement, Delaware law, or any other law, rule or regulation, or at equity;

40


our general partner will not have any liability to us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a general partner so long as such decisions are made in good faith;
our general partner and its officers and directors will not be liable for monetary damages to us or our limited partners resulting from any act or omission unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that our general partner or its officers and directors, as the case may be, acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that the conduct was criminal; and
our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under theour partnership agreement (including any duties to us or our unitholders) if a transaction with an affiliate or the resolution of a conflict of interest is:
approved by the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general partner, although our general partner is not obligated to seek such approval;

39


approved by the vote of a majority of theour outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner and its affiliates;
determined by the board of directors of our general partner to be on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
determined by the board of directors of our general partner to be fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us.

In connection with a situation involving a transaction with an affiliate or a conflict of interest, any determination by our general partner or the conflicts committee must be made in good faith. If an affiliate transaction or the resolution of a conflict of interest is not approved by our common unitholders or the conflicts committee and the board of directors of our general partner determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the affiliate transaction or conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth bulletssub-bullets above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board of directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the partnership challenging such determination, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption.
 
Reimbursements due to our general partner and its affiliates for services provided to us or on our behalf will reduce distributable cash flow to our common unitholders. The amount and timing of such reimbursements will be determined by our general partner.
 
Prior to making any distribution on our common units, we will reimburse our general partner and its affiliates, including EQT, for expenses they incur and payments they make on our behalf. Under the omnibus agreement, we will reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for certain expenses incurred on our behalf, including administrative costs, such as compensation expense for those persons who provide services necessary to run our business, and insurance expenses. Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will determine in good faith the expenses that are allocable to us. The reimbursement of expenses and payment of fees, if any, to our general partner and its affiliates will reduce the amount of available cash to pay cash distributions to our common unitholders.
 
Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and areOur unitholders do not entitled to elect our general partner or itsvote on our general partner’s directors.
 
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, our unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business and, therefore, limited ability to influence management’s decisions regarding our business. Unitholders will have no right on an annual or ongoing basis to elect our general partner or its board of directors. Rather, the board of directors of our general partner will be appointed by EQT. Furthermore, if theour public unitholders are dissatisfied with the performance of our general partner, they will have littlelimited ability to remove our general partner. As a result of these limitations, the price at which the common units will trade could be diminished because of the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management.
 
Even if holders of our common units are dissatisfied, they cannot currently remove our general partner without its consent.
Unitholders will be unable to remove our general partner without its consent because our general partner and its affiliates, including EQT, owns sufficient units to be able to prevent its removal. The vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of all outstanding common and subordinated units voting together as a single class is required to remove our general partner. At December 31, 2014, EQT indirectly owns 35.1% of our outstanding common and subordinated units. Also, if our general partner is removed without cause during the subordination period and units held by our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal, all remaining subordinated units will automatically convert into common units and any existing arrearages on our common units will be extinguished. A removal of our general partner under these circumstances would adversely affect our common units by prematurely eliminating their distribution and liquidation preference over our subordinated units, which would otherwise have continued until we had met certain distribution and performance tests. Cause is narrowly defined to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction has entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding our general partner liable for actual fraud or willful misconduct in its capacity as our general partner. Cause does not include most cases of charges of poor management of the business, so the removal of our general partner because of unitholder dissatisfaction with the performance of our general partner in managing our partnership will most likely result in the termination of the subordination period and conversion of all subordinated units to common units.


40


Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units.

Unitholders’Our unitholders’ voting rights are further restricted by a provision ofin our partnership agreement providingwhich provides that any units held by a person or group that owns 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees and persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the board of directors of our general partner, cannot votebe voted on any matter. In addition, our partnership agreement contains provisions limiting the ability of our unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting our unitholders’

41


ability to influence the manner or direction of our management. As a result, the price at which our common units will trade may be lower because of the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price.
 
Our general partner interest or the control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.
 
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders. Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not restrict the ability of EQT(i) EQGP to transfer all or a portion of its ownership interest in our general partner to a third party, or (ii) EQT to transfer all or a portion of its ownership interest in EQGP’s general partner to a third party. The new owner of our general partner or EQGP’s general partner, as the case may be, would then be in a position to replace the board of directors and officers of our general partner with its own designees and thereby exert significant control over the decisions made by the board of directors and officers.officers of our general partner.
 
The incentive distribution rights of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.
 
EQT, through its control of EQGP, controls our general partner. Our general partner may transfer its incentive distribution rightsthe IDRs to a third party at any time without the consent of our unitholders. If our general partner transfers its incentive distribution rightsthe IDRs to a third party but retains its general partner interest, our general partner may not have the same incentive to grow our partnership and increase quarterly cash distributions to unitholders over time as it would if it had retained ownership of its incentive distribution rights. For example, a transfer of incentive distribution rights by our general partner could reduce the likelihood of EQT selling or contributing additional midstream assets to us, as EQT would have less of an economic incentive to grow our business, which in turn would impact our ability to grow our asset base.IDRs.
 
We may issue additional units without unitholder approval, which would dilute our unitholders’ existing ownership interests.
 
Our partnership agreement does not limit the number of additional limited partner interests, including limited partner interests that rank senior to the common units, that we may issue at any time without the approval of our unitholders. The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:
 
our existing unitholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease;
the amount of distributable cash flow on each unit may decrease;
because a lower percentage of total outstanding units will be subordinated units, the risk that a shortfall in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution will be borne by our common unitholders will increase;
because the amount payable to holders of incentive distribution rightsIDRs is based on a percentage of the total distributable cash flow, the distributions to holders of incentive distribution rightsIDRs will increase even if the per unit distribution on common units remains the same;
the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase;
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit may be diminished; and
the market price of the common units may decline.
 
EQTEQGP may sell units in the public or private markets, and such sales could have an adverse impact on the trading price of the common units.
 
EQT indirectly holds an aggregateAs of 3,959,952February 11, 2016, EQGP held 21,811,643 of our common units and 17,339,718 subordinated units. All of the subordinated units will convert into common units at the end of the subordination period and may convert earlier under certain circumstances. In addition, we have agreed to provide EQTour general partner and its affiliates, including EQGP, with certain registration rights. The sale of these units in the public or private markets could have an adverse impact on the price of the common units or on any trading market that may develop.
 
Our general partner intends to limit its liability regarding our obligations.

Our general partner intends to limit its liability under contractual arrangements so that the counterparties to such arrangements have recourse only against our assets, and not against our general partner or its assets. Our general partner may therefore cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to our general partner. Our partnership agreement permits our general partner to limit its liability, even if we could have obtained more favorable terms without the limitation on liability. In addition, we are obligated to reimburse or indemnify our general partner to the extent that it incurs

41


obligations on our behalf. Any such reimbursement or indemnification payments would reduce the amount of cash otherwise available for distribution to our unitholders.
 
Our general partner has a limited call right that may require our unitholders to sell their common units at an undesirable time or price.
 
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more than 80% of theour outstanding common units, our general partner will have the right, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, but not the obligation, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the commonremaining units held by unaffiliated persons at a price that is not less than theirthe then-current market price as calculated pursuant toof the terms

42


common units. As a result, our unitholders may be required to sell their common units at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on their investment. Our common unitholders may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of their common units. EQT indirectly owns approximately 9.1%As of February 11, 2016, affiliates of our outstanding common units. At the end of the subordination period, assuming no additional issuances of common units (other than upon the conversion of the subordinated units), EQT will indirectlygeneral partner own approximately 35.1%28.1% of our outstanding common units.
 
Our general partner, or any transferee holding a majority of the incentive distribution rights, may elect to cause us to issue common units to it in connection with a resetting of the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels related to the incentive distribution rights, without the approval of the conflicts committee of our general partner or our unitholders. This election may result in lower distributions to our common unitholders in certain situations.
 
The holder or holders of a majority of the incentive distribution rights,IDRs, which is currently our general partner, have the right, at any time when there are no subordinated units outstanding and the holders have received incentive distributions at the highest level to which they are entitled (48.0%) for each of the prior four consecutive fiscal quarters (and the amount of each such distribution did not exceed adjusted operating surplus for each such quarter), to reset the minimum quarterly distribution and the initial target distribution levels at higher levels based on our cash distribution at the time of the exercise of the reset election. Following a reset election, the minimum quarterly distribution will be reset to an amount equal to the average cash distribution per unit for the two fiscal quarters immediately preceding the reset election (such amount is referred to as the “reset minimum quarterly distribution”), and the target distribution levels will be reset to correspondingly higher levels based on percentage increases above the reset minimum quarterly distribution. Our general partner has the right to transfer the incentive distribution rightsIDRs at any time, in whole or in part, and any transferee holding a majority of the incentive distribution rightsIDRs shall have the same rights as our general partner with respect to resetting target distributions.
 
In the event of a reset of the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels, the holders of the incentive distribution rightsIDRs will be entitled to receive, in the aggregate, the number of common units equal to that number of common units which would have entitled the holders to an average aggregate quarterly cash distribution in the prior two quarters equal to the average of the distributions on the incentive distribution rightsIDRs in the prior two quarters. Our general partner will also be issued the number of general partner units necessary to maintain its general partner interest in us that existed immediately prior to the reset election. We anticipate that our general partner would exercise this reset right in order to facilitate acquisitions or internal growth projects that would not otherwise be sufficiently accretive to cash distributions per common unit. It is possible, however, that our general partner or a transferee could exercise this reset election at a time when it is experiencing, or expects to experience, declines in the cash distributions it receives related to its incentive distribution rightsthe IDRs and may therefore desire to be issued common units rather than retain the right to receive incentive distribution payments based on target distribution levels that are less certain to be achieved in the then current business environment. This risk could be elevated if our incentive distribution rightsIDRs have been transferred to a third party. As a result, a reset election may cause our common unitholders to experience dilution in the amount of cash distributions that they would have otherwise received had we not issued common units to our general partner in connection with resetting the target distribution levels.

Our unitholders’ liability may not be limited if a court finds that unitholder action constitutes control of our business.
 
A general partner of a partnership generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the partnership, except for those contractual obligations of the partnership that are expressly made without recourse to the general partner. Our partnership is organized under Delaware law, and we conduct business in a number of other states. The limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some of the other states in which we do business. Our unitholdersA unitholder could be liable for any and all of our obligations as if our unitholdersthat unitholder were a general partner if a court or government agency were to determine that:
 
we were conducting business in a state but had not complied with that particular state’s partnership statute; or

42


our unitholderssuch unitholder's right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace our general partner, to approve some amendments to our partnership agreement or to take other actions under our partnership agreement constituteconstitutes “control” of our business.
 
Furthermore, under Delaware law, a unitholder may be liable to us for the amount of a distribution for a period of three years from the date of the distribution under certain circumstances.


Our general partner may mortgage, pledge or grant a security interest in all or substantially all of our assets without prior approval of our unitholders.

Our general partner may mortgage, pledge or grant a security interest in all or substantially all of our assets without prior approval of our unitholders. If our general partner at any time were to decide to incur debt and secure its obligations or indebtedness by all or substantially all of our assets, and if our general partner were to be unable to satisfy such obligations or repay such indebtedness, the lenders could seek to foreclose on our assets. The lenders could also sell all or substantially all of

43


our assets under such foreclosure or other realization upon those encumbrances without prior approval of our unitholders, which would adversely affect the price of our common units.

Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that were wrongfully distributed to them.
 
Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to our unitholders if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. Delaware law provides that for a period of three years from the date of an impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution amount. Transferees of common units are liable both for the obligations of the transferor to make contributions to the partnership that were known to the transferee at the time of transfer and for those obligations that were unknown if the liabilities could have been determined from the partnership agreement. Neither liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interest nor liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted.
 
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
 
Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. If the IRS were to treat us as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, which would subject us to entity-level taxation, then our distributable cash flow to our unitholders would be substantially reduced.
 
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in theour common units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. We have not requested, and do not currently plan to request, a ruling from the IRS regarding our qualification as a partnership foron this or any other tax purposes.matter affecting us.
 
Despite the fact that we are a limited partnership under Delaware law, it is possible in certain circumstances for a partnership such as ours to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. A change in our business or a change in current law could cause us to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject us to taxation as an entity.
 
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35.0%35%, and would likely pay state and local income tax at varying rates. Distributions to our unitholders would generally be taxed again as corporate dividends (to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits), and no income, gains, losses, deductions, or credits would flow through to you.our unitholders. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation, our distributable cash flow to our unitholders would be substantially reduced. Therefore, if we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes there would be a material reduction in the anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to our unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.

Our partnership agreement provides that, if a law is enacted or existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that subjects us to taxation as a corporation or otherwise subjects us to entity-level taxation for federal, state or local income tax purposes, the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the target distribution amounts may be adjusted to reflect the impact of that law on us.
 
If we were subjected to a material amount of additional entity-level taxation by individual states or other taxing jurisdictions, it would reduce ourdistributable cash flowto our unitholders.
 
Following our expansion into Ohio with the OVC, we may be subject to an entity-level gross receipts tax in Ohio. Changes in current law may subject us to additional entity-level taxation by individual states or other taxing jurisdictions. Because of widespread state budget deficits and other reasons, several states and other taxing jurisdictions are evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation through the imposition of state income, franchise and other forms of taxation. Imposition of such additional tax on us by a state or other taxing jurisdiction would reduce the distributable cash flow to our unitholders. Our partnership agreement provides that, if a law is enacted or existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that subjects us to entity-level taxation, the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the target distribution amounts may be adjusted to reflect the impact of that law on us.
 
The tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships or an investment in our common units could be subject to potential legislative, judicial or administrative changes and differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.

4344


The present federal income tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships, including us, or an investment in our common units may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial interpretationchanges or differing interpretations at any time. For example, a federal budget proposal for fiscal year 2016 recommended that certain publicly traded partnerships earning income from activities related to fossil fuels be taxed as corporations beginning in 2021.From time to time, members of the U.S. Congress propose and consider such substantive changes to the existing federal income tax laws that affect publicly traded partnerships, such aspartnerships. If successful, the federal budget proposal or other similar proposals eliminatingcould eliminate the qualifying income exception to the treatment of all publicly traded partnerships as corporations upon which we rely for our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We are unable to predict whether any of these changes or any other proposals will ultimately be enacted, but it is possible that a change in law could affect us and may, if enacted, be applied retroactively. Any such changes could negatively impact the value of an investment in our common units.
 
Our unitholders’ share of our income will be taxable to them for U.S. federal income tax purposes even if they do not receive any cash distributions from us.
 
Because a unitholder will be treated as a partner to whom we will allocate taxable income which could be different in amount than the cash we distribute, a unitholder’s allocable share of our taxable income will be taxable to it, which may require the payment of federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income taxes on its share of our taxable income even if it receives no cash distributions from us. Our unitholders may not receive cash distributions from us equal to their share of our taxable income or even equal to the actual tax liability that results from that income.
 
If the IRS contests the federal income tax positions we take, the market for our common units may be adversely impacted and the cost of any IRS contest will reduce our distributable cash flow to our unitholders.
 
We have not requested, and do not currently plan to request, a ruling from the IRS with respect to our treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.purposes or any other tax matter affecting us. The IRS may adopt positions that differ from the conclusions of our counsel expressed in a prospectus or from the positions we take, and the IRS’s positions may ultimately be sustained. It may be necessary to resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or all of our counsel’s conclusions or the positions we take and such positions may not ultimately be sustained. A court may not agree with some or all of our counsel’s conclusions or the positions we take. Any contest with the IRS, and the outcome of any IRS contest, may have a materially adverse impact on the market for our common units and the price at which they trade. In addition, our costs of any contest with the IRS will be borne indirectly by our unitholders and our general partner because the costs will reduce our distributable cash flow.
 
If the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns for tax years beginning after 2017, it may collect any resulting taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) directly from us, in which case our cash available for distribution to our unitholders might be substantially reduced.

Pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, if the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns for tax years beginning after 2017, it may collect any resulting taxes (including any applicable interest and penalties) directly from us. We will generally have the ability to shift any such tax liability to our general partner and our unitholders in accordance with their interests in us during the year under audit, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so under all circumstances. If we are required to make payments of taxes, penalties and interest resulting from audit adjustments, our cash available for distribution to our unitholders might be substantially reduced.

Tax gain or loss on the disposition of our common units could be more or less than expected.
 
If our unitholders sell their common units, our unitholders will recognize a gain or loss for federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the amount realized and their tax basis in those common units. Because distributions in excess of our unitholdersunitholders' allocable share of our net taxable income decrease their tax basis in their common units, the amount, if any, of such prior excess distributions with respect to the common units our unitholders sell will, in effect, become taxable income to our unitholders if they sell such common units at a price greater than their tax basis in those common units, even if the price our unitholders receive is less than their original cost. Furthermore, a substantial portion of the amount realized on any sale or other disposition of our unitholdersunitholders' common units, whether or not representing gain, may be taxed as ordinary income due to potential recapture items, including depreciation recapture. In addition, because the amount realized includes a unitholder’sour unitholders' share of our nonrecourse liabilities, if our unitholders sell their common units, our unitholders may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash they receive from the sale.
 

45


Tax-exempt entities and non-U.S. persons face unique tax issues from owning our common units that may result in adverse tax consequences to them.
 
Investment in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs), and non-U.S. persons raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all of our income allocated to organizations that are exempt from federal income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them. Distributions to non-U.S. persons will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable effective tax rate, and non-U.S. persons will be required to file U.S. federal income tax returns and pay tax on their share of our taxable income. If our unitholders are a tax-exempt entityentities or a non-U.S. person,persons, our unitholders should consult a tax advisor before investing in our common units.
 
We will treat each purchaser of common units as having the same tax benefits without regard to the actual common units purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could adversely affect the value of the common units.
 
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common units and because of other reasons, we will adopt depreciation and amortization positions that may not conform to all aspects of existing Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to those positions could adversely affect the amount of tax benefits available to you.our unitholders. Our counsel is unable to opine

44


as to the validity of such filing positions. It also could affect the timing of these tax benefits or the amount of gain from our unitholders saleunitholders' sales of common units and could have a negative impact on the value of our common units or result in audit adjustments to our unitholdersunitholders' tax returns.
 
We prorate our items of income, gain, loss and deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes between transferors and transferees of our units each month based upon the ownership of our units on the first day of each month, instead of on the basis of the date a particular unit is transferred. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss and deduction among our unitholders.
 
We will prorate our items of income, gain, loss and deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes between transferors and transferees of our units each month based upon the ownership of our units on the first day of each month, instead of on the basis of the date a particular unit is transferred. Although simplifying conventions are contemplated by the Code and most publicly traded partnerships use similar simplifying conventions, the use of this method may not be permitted under existing Treasury Regulations as there is no direct or indirect controlling authority on this issue. Even thoughRecently, however, the Department of the Treasury and the IRS have issued proposed Treasury Regulations that provide a safe harbor pursuant to which a publicly traded partnershipspartnership may use a similar monthly simplifying convention to allocate tax items among the transferor and transferee unitholders although such items must be prorated on a daily basis. We are currently evaluating these proposed regulations, which will apply beginning with our taxable year that begins on January 1, 2016. The Treasury Regulations do not specifically authorize the use of the proration method we have currently adopted. IfAccordingly, our counsel is unable to opine as to the IRS were to challengevalidity of this method of allocating income and deductions between transferee and transferor unitholders. If this method is not allowed under the Treasury Regulations, or newonly applies to transfers of less than all of the unitholder’s interest, our taxable income or losses could be reallocated among our unitholders. We are authorized to revise our method of allocation between transferee and transferor unitholders, as well as among unitholders whose interests vary during a taxable year, to conform to a method permitted under future Treasury regulations were issued, we mayRegulations.

A unitholder who disposes of units prior to the record date set for a cash distribution for that quarter will be required to change the allocation ofallocated items of our income, gain, loss and deduction among our unitholders. Our counsel hasattributable to the month of disposition but will not rendered an opinion with respectbe entitled to whether our monthly conventionreceive a cash distribution for allocating taxable income and losses is permitted under by existing Treasury Regulations.that period.
 
A unitholder whose common units are loaned to a “short seller” to cover a short sale of common units may be considered as having disposed of those common units. If so, he would no longer be treated for federal income tax purposes as a partner with respect to those common units during the period of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from the disposition.
 
Because a unitholder whose common units are loaned to a “short seller” to cover a short sale of common units may be considered as having disposed of the loaned common units, he may no longer be treated for federal income tax purposes as a partner with respect to those common units during the period of the loan to the short seller and the unitholder may recognize gain or loss from such disposition. Moreover, during the period of the loan to the short seller, any of our income, gain, loss or deduction with respect to those common units may not be reportable by the unitholder and any cash distributions received by the unitholder as to those common units could be fully taxable as ordinary income. Our counsel has not rendered an opinion regarding the treatment of a unitholder where common units are loaned to a short seller to cover a short sale of common units; therefore, our unitholders desiring to assure their status as partners and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a loan to a short seller are urged to consult a tax advisor to discuss whether it is advisable to modify any applicable brokerage account agreements to prohibit their brokers from loaning their common units.
 

46


We have adopted certain valuation methodologies in determining a unitholder’s allocations of income, gain, loss and deduction. The IRS may challenge these methodologies or the resulting allocations, and such a challenge could adversely affect the value of our common units.

In determining the items of income, gain, loss and deduction allocable to our unitholders, we must routinely determine the fair market value of our assets. Although we may from time to time consult with professional appraisers regarding valuation matters, we make many fair market value estimates using a methodology based on the market value of our common units as a means to measure the fair market value of our assets. The IRS may challenge these valuation methods and the resulting allocations of income, gain, loss and deduction.

A successful IRS challenge to these methods or allocations could adversely affect the timing or amount of taxable income or loss being allocated to our unitholders. It also could affect the amount of gain from our unitholders’ sale of common units and could have a negative impact on the value of the common units or result in audit adjustments to our unitholders’ tax returns without the benefit of additional deductions.

The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and profits interests during any twelve-month period will result in the termination of our partnership for federal income tax purposes.
 
We will be considered to have technically terminated our partnership for federal income tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital and profits within a twelve-month period. For purposes of determining whether the 50% threshold has been met, multiple sales of the same interest will be counted only once. Our

45


technical termination would, among other things, result in the closing of our taxable year for all unitholders, which would result in us filing two tax returns (and our unitholders could receive two Schedules K-1 if relief was not available and/or granted by the IRS to provide one Schedule K-1 to unitholders for the year notwithstanding two partnership tax years) for one fiscal year and could result in a deferral of depreciation deductions allowable in computing our taxable income. In the case of a unitholder reporting on a taxable year other than a fiscal year ending December 31, the closing of our taxable year may also result in more than twelve months of our taxable income or loss being includable in his taxable income for the year of termination. Our termination currently would not affect our classification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, but instead we would be treated as a new partnership for tax purposes. If treated as a new partnership, we must make new tax elections and could be subject to penalties if we are unable to determine that a termination occurred.
 
As a result of investing in our common units, our unitholders may become subject to state and local taxes and return filing requirements in jurisdictions where we operate or own or acquire properties.
 
In addition to federal income taxes, our unitholders will likely be subject to other taxes, including state and local taxes, unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions in which we conduct business or own property now or in the future, even if they do not live in any of those jurisdictions. Our unitholders will likely be required to file state and local income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes in some or all of these various jurisdictions. Further, our unitholders may be subject to penalties for failure to comply with those requirements. We own property or conduct business in Pennsylvania and West Virginia and will be expanding into Ohio with the OVC and Virginia with the MVP, each of which currently impose a personal income tax on individuals. Each of these states also impose an income or gross receipts tax on corporations and other entities. As we make acquisitions or expand our business, we may own property or conduct business in additional states that impose a personal income tax. It is our unitholdersunitholders’ responsibility to file all U.S. federal, state and local tax returns. Our counsel has not rendered an opinion on the state or local tax consequences of an investment in our common units.
 
Compliance with and changes in tax laws could adversely affect our performance.
 
We are subject to extensive tax laws and regulations, including federal, state and foreign income taxes and transactional taxes such as excise, sales/use, payroll, franchise and ad valorem taxes. New tax laws and regulations and changes in existing tax laws and regulations are continuously being enacted that could result in increased tax expenditures in the future. Many of these tax liabilities are subject to audits by the respective taxing authority. These audits may result in additional taxes as well as interest and penalties.
 
See also Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” for further discussion regarding the Partnership’sEQM's exposure to market risks, which is incorporated herein by reference.

47



Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.

Item 2.       Properties
 
For a description of material properties, see Item 1, “Business,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
 
In the ordinary course of business, various legal and regulatory claims and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Partnership.EQM. While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the PartnershipEQM is unable to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of such claims and proceedings. The PartnershipEQM accrues legal and other direct costs related to loss contingencies when actually incurred. The PartnershipEQM has established reserves it believes to be appropriate for pending matters and, after consultation with counsel and giving appropriate consideration to available insurance, the PartnershipEQM believes that the ultimate outcome of any matter currently pending against the Partnershipit will not materially affect its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.
 
Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not applicable.

46



PART II
 
Item 5.        Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “EQM". The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices reflected in the NYSE Composite Transactions of the common units, as reported by the NYSE, as well as the amount of cash distributions declared per quarter for 20142015 and 2013.2014.
 
Common Unit Data by Quarter
 2014 2013 2015 2014
 Unit Price Range Distributions Unit Price Range Distributions Unit Price Range Distributions Unit Price Range Distributions
     per Common     per Common     per Common     per Common
 High Low Unit High Low Unit High Low Unit High Low Unit
1st Quarter $70.89
 $57.62
 $0.46
 $40.74
 $31.30
 $0.35
 $92.09
 $73.94
 $0.58
 $70.89
 $57.62
 $0.46
2nd Quarter $102.51
 $69.69
 $0.49
 $51.72
 $35.26
 $0.37
 89.47
 76.69
 0.61
 102.51
 69.69
 0.49
3rd Quarter $98.68
 $81.58
 $0.52
 $51.22
 $42.16
 $0.40
 83.68
 59.21
 0.64
 98.68
 81.58
 0.52
4th Quarter $92.56
 $72.56
 $0.55
 $59.39
 $48.45
 $0.43
 $79.10
 $56.52
 $0.675
 $92.56
 $72.56
 $0.55
 
As of January 30, 2015,29, 2016, there were three unitholders of record of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units. A cash distribution of $0.58$0.71 per common unit was declared on January 22, 201521, 2016 and will be paid on February 13, 201512, 2016 to unitholders of record at the close of business on February 3, 2015.1, 2016.
 
As of December 31, 2014, the Partnership2015, EQM has also issued 17,339,718 subordinated units and 1,238,5141,443,015 general partner units for which there is no established public trading market. All of the subordinated units are held by an affiliate of the Partnership’s general partner. The general partner and its affiliates receive quarterly distributions on the subordinated units only after sufficient distributions have been paidSee Note 7 to the common units. The subordination period with respect to the subordinated units will expire on February 17, 2015, at which time all of the subordinated units will convert to common units on a one-for-one basis. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information on the significant provisions of the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement that relate to distributions of available cash, minimum quarterly distributions and incentive distribution rights.
 
Market Repurchases
 
The PartnershipEQM did not repurchase any of its common units during 2014.2015.
 

48


Equity Compensation Plans
 
The information relating to the Partnership’sEQM’s equity compensation plans required by Item 5 is included in Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” of this Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 6.        Selected Financial Data
 
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.
 
The PartnershipEQM closed its IPO on July 2, 2012. Equitrans is a Pennsylvania limited partnership and the predecessor for accounting purposes of the Partnership.EQM. For periods prior to the IPO, the following selected financial data reflect the assets, liabilities and results of operations of Equitrans presented on a carve-out basis excluding the financial position and results of operations of the Big Sandy Pipeline. Prior to July 2011, Equitrans owned an approximately 70 mile70-mile FERC-regulated transmission pipeline located in eastern Kentucky (Big Sandy Pipeline). Equitrans has no continuing operations in Kentucky or retained interest in the Big Sandy Pipeline. For periods beginning at or following the IPO, the selected financial data reflect the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the PartnershipEQM and its consolidated subsidiaries. Additionally, as discussed below, the Partnership’sEQM’s consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively recast for all periods presented to include the historical results of SunriseNWV Gathering, Jupiter and Jupiter,Sunrise as these were businesses and the acquisitions were transactions between entities under common control. The

47


selected financial data covering periods prior to the closing ofNWV Gathering Acquisition, prior to the IPO,Jupiter Acquisition, prior to the Sunrise Merger and prior to the Jupiter Acquisitionclosing of the IPO may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations had Equitrans,NWV Gathering, Jupiter, Sunrise and JupiterEquitrans been operated together during those periods.
 As of and for the years ended December 31, As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Statements of Consolidated Operations   (Thousands, except per share amounts)     (Thousands, except per share amounts)  
Total operating revenues $392,959
 $303,712
 $200,005
 $150,986
 $115,228
Operating revenues $614,134
 $476,547
 $354,001
 $236,293
 $169,759
Operating income 273,736
 213,109
 125,022
 87,709
 57,902
 437,808
 326,712
 244,794
 150,600
 101,058
Net income $232,773
 $171,107
 $94,241
 $53,230
 $31,743
 $393,450
 $266,500
 $189,791
 $110,216
 $61,389
Net income per limited partner unit (a):
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Basic $3.53
 $2.47
 $1.03
 N/A
 N/A
 $4.71
 $3.53
 $2.47
 $1.03
 N/A
Diluted 3.52
 2.46
 1.03
 N/A
 N/A
 4.70
 3.52
 2.46
 1.03
 N/A
Cash distributions paid per limited partner unit $2.02
 $1.55
 $0.35
 N/A
 N/A
 $2.505
 $2.02
 $1.55
 $0.35
 N/A
                    
Consolidated Balance Sheets  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Total assets $1,421,990
 $1,063,972
 $876,610
 $653,138
 $485,463
 $2,633,835
 $1,822,819
 $1,351,940
 $999,914
 $713,708
Long-term debt 492,633
 
 
 135,235
 135,235
 493,401
 492,633
 
 
 135,235
Long-term lease obligation $143,828
 $133,733
 $
 $
 $
 $175,660
 $143,828
 $133,733
 $
 $

(a)       Net income attributable to NWV Gathering for periods prior to the IPO,March 17, 2015, net income attributable to Jupiter for periods prior to May 7, 2014, net income attributable to Sunrise for periods prior to July 22, 2013 and net income attributable to Jupiterperiods prior to May 7, 2014 arethe IPO were not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per limited partner unit. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion.

49

Table of Contents


Item 7.                    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Executive Overview
 
Key transactions during 20142015 included the JupiterNWV Gathering Acquisition, the MVP Interest Acquisition, the Preferred Interest Acquisition, an equity offering of 12,362,5009,487,500 common units in March, the launch of the $750 million ATM Program and the $500 million senior notean equity offering of 5,650,000 common units in November as discussed in the Overview section of Item 1, "Business."

On January 22, 2015, the Partnership declared a cash distribution to unitholders of $0.58 per unit, which represented a 5% increase over the previous distribution paid on November 14, 2014 of $0.55 per unit. Total distributions declared related to 2014 were $2.14 per unit compared to $1.66 per unit total distributions declared related to 2013, a 29% increase.

The PartnershipEQM reported net income of $232.8$393.5 million in 20142015 compared with $171.1$266.5 million in 2013.2014. The net income increase of $61.7$127.0 million was primarily related to higher operating income of $60.6$111.1 million. The increase in operating income was driven by production development in the Marcellus Shale by EQT and third parties as gathering revenues increased by $95.5 million and transmission and storage revenues increased by $42.1 million. These increases in revenues were partly offset by higher operating costs of $26.5 million. Interest expense increased by $14.8 million primarily due to interest on long-term debt issued in August 2014 and the AVC capital lease while income tax expense decreased by $25.0 million as a result of the changes in tax status associated with the NWV Gathering and Jupiter Acquisitions in 2015 and 2014, respectively.

EQM reported net income of $266.5 million in 2014 compared with $189.8 million in 2013. The increase of $76.7 million was primarily related to higher operating income of $81.9 million. The increase in operating income was driven by production development in the Marcellus Shale by third parties and EQT as transmission and storage revenues increased by $80.9 million and gathering revenues increased by $8.3$41.6 million. These increases in revenues were partly offset by higher operating costs of $28.6$40.6 million. Interest expense increased by $29.2 million primarily due to interest on the AVC capital lease and long-term debt while income tax expense decreased by $29.1$22.9 million as a result of the changes in tax status associated with the Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise Merger.Merger in 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Partnership reported net incomeOn January 21, 2016, EQM declared a cash distribution to unitholders of $171.1 million in 2013 compared with $94.2 million in 2012. The$0.71 per unit, which represented a 5% increase was primarilyover the previous distribution paid on November 13, 2015 of $0.675 per unit and a 22% increase over the distribution paid on February 13, 2015 of $0.58 per unit related to an increase in operating incomethe fourth quarter of $88.1 million, partly offset by2014. Total distributions related to 2015 were $2.635 per unit compared to $2.14 per unit total distributions related to 2014, a decrease in other income as a result of lower AFUDC on fewer regulated construction projects and increased income tax expense as a result of Jupiter operations prior to the acquisition. Transmission and storage revenues increased by $53.1 million due to increased firm transmission service and increased system throughput. Gathering revenues increased by $50.6 million due to an 86% increase in gathered volumes. Both revenue increases were driven by production development in the Marcellus Shale by EQT and third parties. These increases in revenues were partly offset by a $15.6 million increase in operating expenses.23% increase.

Business Segment Results
 
Operating segments are revenue-producing components of the enterprise for which separate financial information is produced internally and is subject to evaluation by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources.

48

Table of Contents

Interest, equity income and other income are managed on a consolidated basis. The PartnershipEQM has presented each segment’s operating income and various operational measures in the sections below. Management believes that the presentation of this information provides useful information to management and investors regarding the financial condition, results of operations and trends of segments. The PartnershipEQM has reconciled each segment’s operating income to the Partnership’sEQM’s consolidated operating income and net income in Note 34 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements.
 
Operating revenues and operating expenses related to the AVC facilities do not have an impact on adjusted EBITDA or distributable cash flow as the excess of the AVC revenues over operating and maintenance and selling, general and administrative expenses is paid to EQT as the current monthly lease payment. All revenues related to the AVC facilities are from third-parties.third parties.

50

Table of Contents


TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
  Years Ended December 31,
  2015 2014 
%
change
2015 –
2014
 2013 
change
2014 -
2013
FINANCIAL DATA (Thousands, other than per day amounts)
Firm reservation revenues $247,231
 $202,112
 22.3
 $127,022
 59.1
Volumetric based fee revenues:          
Usage fees under firm contracts(a)
 42,646
 41,828
 2.0
 42,312
 (1.1)
Usage fees under interruptible contracts 7,018
 10,880
 (35.5) 4,547
 139.3
Total volumetric based fee revenues 49,664
 52,708
 (5.8) 46,859
 12.5
Total operating revenues 296,895
 254,820
 16.5
 173,881
 46.5
Operating expenses:      
    
Operating and maintenance 33,024
 24,780
 33.3
 15,041
 64.7
Selling, general and administrative 31,215
 19,954
 56.4
 15,567
 28.2
Depreciation and amortization 29,497
 26,792
 10.1
 18,323
 46.2
Total operating expenses 93,736
 71,526
 31.1
 48,931
 46.2
Operating income $203,159
 $183,294
 10.8
 $124,950
 46.7
           
OPERATIONAL DATA  
  
  
  
  
Transmission pipeline throughput (BBtu per day)          
Firm capacity reservation 1,841
 1,405
 31.0
 855
 64.3
Volumetric based services(b)
 281
 389
 (27.8) 291
 33.7
Total transmission pipeline throughput 2,122
 1,794
 18.3
 1,146
 56.5
           
Average contracted firm transmission reservation commitments (BBtu per day) 2,624
 2,056
 27.6
 1,305
 57.5
           
Capital expenditures $168,873
 $127,134
 32.8
 $77,989
 63.0

(a) Includes commodity charges and fees on volumes transported in excess of firm contracted capacity.
(b) Includes volumes transported under interruptible contracts and volumes in excess of firm contracted capacity.

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

Transmission and Storage Resultsstorage revenues increased by $42.1 million reflecting production development in the Marcellus Shale by affiliate and third party producers. The increase primarily resulted from higher firm reservation fees of Operations
  Years Ended December 31,
  2014 2013 
%
change
2014 –
2013
 2012 
change
2013 -
2012
FINANCIAL DATA (Thousands, other than per day amounts)
Operating revenues $254,820
 $173,881
 46.5 $120,797
 43.9
Operating expenses:          
Operating and maintenance 24,780
 15,041
 64.7 15,191
 (1.0)
Selling, general and administrative 19,954
 15,567
 28.2 11,578
 34.5
Depreciation and amortization 26,792
 18,323
 46.2 12,901
 42.0
Total operating expenses 71,526
 48,931
 46.2 39,670
 23.3
Operating income $183,294
 $124,950
 46.7 $81,127
 54.0
           
OPERATIONAL DATA  
  
    
  
Transmission pipeline throughput (BBtu per day) 1,794
 1,146
 56.5 606
 89.1
Capital expenditures $127,134
 $77,989
 63.0 $188,143
 (58.5)
$45.1 million partly offset by lower usage fees under interruptible contracts. The decrease in usage fees was primarily due to customers contracting for additional firm capacity.

Operating expenses increased by $22.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in operating and maintenance expense resulted from higher repairs and maintenance expenses of $4.9 million associated with increased throughput, higher property taxes of $2.3 million and higher allocations, including personnel costs, from EQT. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased primarily as a result of higher allocations and personnel costs from EQT. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily a result of higher depreciation on the increased investment in transmission infrastructure.

51

Table of Contents


Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013
    
Transmission and storage revenues increased by $80.9 million as a result of higher firm transmission and storage contracted capacity and throughput of $76.4 million, including $29.2 million related to the AVC facilities, and higher interruptible transmission service. The increase in transmission revenue is the result of increasedreflecting production development in the Marcellus Shale by third partiesparty producers and affiliates. The increase primarily resulted from higher firm reservation fees of $75.1 million and increased usage fees under interruptible contracts.

Operating expenses increased $22.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in operating and maintenance expense resulted from $5.3 million of additional costs associated with operating the AVC facilities, of $5.3 million, $2.3 million of increased repairs and maintenance expenses associated with increased throughput and $1.2 million of higher allocations, including personnel costs, from EQT. Selling, general and administrative expense increased primarily from additional costs associated with operating the AVC facilities of $3.1 million and $1.1 million of increased personnel costs including incentive compensation.costs. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily a result of higher AVC facilities capital lease depreciation expense of $5.3$5.4 million and higher depreciation on the increased investment in transmission infrastructure, most notably the Low Pressure East expansion project that was placed into service in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the Jefferson compressor station expansion project that was placed into service in the third quarter of 2014.

GATHERING

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
  Years Ended December 31,
  2015 2014 
%
change
2015 –
2014
 2013 
change
2014 -
2013
FINANCIAL DATA (Thousands, other than per day amounts)
Firm reservation revenues $256,217
 $37,449
 584.2
 $
 N/A
Volumetric based fee revenues:          
Usage fees under firm contracts(a) 33,021
 44,594
 (26.0) 
 N/A
Usage fees under interruptible contracts 28,001
 139,684
 (80.0) 180,120
 (22.4)
Total volumetric based fee revenues 61,022
 184,278
 (66.9) 180,120
 2.3
Total operating revenues 317,239
 221,727
 43.1
 180,120
 23.1
Operating expenses:      
    
Operating and maintenance 35,237
 30,496
 15.5
 27,686
 10.1
Selling, general and administrative 25,210
 28,551
 (11.7) 20,007
 42.7
Depreciation and amortization 22,143
 19,262
 15.0
 12,583
 53.1
Total operating expenses 82,590
 78,309
 5.5
 60,276
 29.9
Operating income $234,649
 $143,418
 63.6
 $119,844
 19.7
           
OPERATIONAL DATA  
  
  
  
  
Gathering volumes (BBtu per day)          
Firm capacity reservation 1,115
 180
 519.4
 
 N/A
Volumetric based services 391
 973
 (59.8) 864
 12.6
Total gathered volumes 1,506
 1,153
 30.6
 864
 33.4
           
Capital expenditures $207,342
 $226,168
 (8.3) $197,543
 14.5

(a) Includes fees on volumes gathered in excess of firm contracted capacity.
(b) Includes volumes gathered under interruptible contracts and volumes in excess of firm contracted capacity.

Year Ended December 31, 20132015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20122014

Transmission and storageGathering revenues increased in 2013 by $53.1$95.5 million primarily as a result of higher firm transmission contracted capacity and throughput by affiliates and third parties as compared to the prior year. This increase included $44.8 million of revenue associated with increased reservation fees under firm contracts and $10.9 million of fees associated with firm usage charges and transportedaffiliate volumes in excess of firm capacity. These increases were primarilygathered driven by activity related toproduction development in the Sunrise Pipeline and the Blacksville compressor station, which were completedMarcellus Shale. EQM significantly increased firm reservation fee revenues in July and September 2012,2015 compared

4952

Table of Contents

respectively,to 2014 as well as the addition of the AVC facilities in December 2013. This increased activity was a result of increased production development in the Marcellus Shale. These increases were partly offset by acapacity under firm contracts with affiliates. The decrease in storage and parking revenues of $3.2 million.usage fees was primarily due to affiliates contracting for additional firm capacity.

Operating expenses totaled $48.9increased by $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20132015 compared to $39.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in selling, general2014. Operating and administrativemaintenance expense resulted from several items, including $2.4 million of lower reserve adjustments, $0.9 million of increased personnel costs and $0.7 million of transaction costs in connection with the Sunrise Merger. The lower reserve adjustments related to a long-term regulatory asset and a legal accrual. The regulatory reserve was established for the recovery of base storage gas. Asas a result of higher than anticipated recoveries through its transmission retainage factor due toallocations, including personnel costs, from EQT of $3.1 million and higher repairs and maintenance expenses associated with increased volumes on the system and system integrity improvements, the Partnership revised its estimate of the appropriate reserve and recorded reserve reductions of $2.5 million in 2012 and $0.7 million in 2013. The difference between the 2012 reserve reduction and the 2013 reduction resulted in a $1.8 million increase in selling,throughput. Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2013.decreased as a result of lower allocations primarily related to incentive compensation. The Partnership also recorded a $0.6 million reductionfinancial statements of NWV Gathering and Jupiter prior to a legal reserve in 2012.EQM's acquisition included long-term incentive compensation plan expense associated with certain EQT long-term incentive plans which were not an expense of EQM subsequent to the acquisitions. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was a result of increased investment in transmission infrastructure, most notably a full year of depreciation in 2013 for both the Sunrise Pipeline and the Blacksville compressor station.resulted from additional assets placed in-service.

Gathering Results of Operations
  Years Ended December 31,
  2014 2013 
%
change
2014 –
2013
 2012 
change
2013 -
2012
FINANCIAL DATA (Thousands, other than per day amounts)
Operating revenues $138,139
 $129,831
 6.4 $79,208
 63.9
Operating expenses:          
Operating and maintenance 20,654
 20,537
 0.6 19,059
 7.8
Selling, general and administrative 17,236
 13,534
 27.4 9,624
 40.6
Depreciation and amortization 9,807
 7,601
 29.0 6,630
 14.6
Total operating expenses 47,697
 41,672
 14.5 35,313
 18.0
Operating income $90,442
 $88,159
 2.6 $43,895
 100.8
           
OPERATIONAL DATA  
  
    
  
Gathering volumes (BBtu per day) 743
 629
 18.1 339
 85.5
Capital expenditures $118,014
 $30,254
 290.1 $35,118
 (13.9)

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Gathering revenues increased by $8.3$41.6 million primarily as a result of higher gathered volumes partly offset by a lower average gathering rate for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in gathered volumes was due to higheraffiliate volumes gathered for both EQT and third parties as a result of increaseddriven by production development in the Marcellus Shale. EQM significantly increased firm reservation fee revenues in 2014 compared to 2013 as a result of increased capacity under firm contracts with affiliates. The average gathering rate decreaseddecrease in usage fees was primarily due to a lower 2014 gathering rate on Jupiter under the Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement.affiliates contracting for additional firm capacity.

Operating expenses increased by $6.0$18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in operating and maintenance expense was primarily due to increases in allocations from EQT, including higher personnel costs, and repairs and maintenance, consistent with the growth of the gathering systems. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense primarily resulted from increased allocations from EQT of $2.5$7.3 million including personnel costs and transaction costs of $1.0 million incurred by the PartnershipEQM in connection with the Jupiter Acquisition. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense resulted from additional assets placed in-service.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

Gathering revenues increased by $50.6 million due to an increase in the average daily volumes gathered of 290 BBtu, or 86%, compared to the prior year, partly offset by a decrease in the average gathering fee. The increase in gathered volumes was primarily the result of higher volumes gathered for EQT in the Marcellus Shale, primarily on Jupiter. The average gathering fee decreased due to a lower gathering rate on Marcellus volumes for Jupiter.


50

Table of Contents

Operating expenses totaled $41.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $35.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increases in operating and maintenance expense and selling, general and administrative expense were primarily due to increases in allocations from EQT including higher personnel costs and repairs and maintenance, consistent with the growth in the Jupiter gathering system. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense resulted from additional assets placed in-service on the Jupiter gathering system.

Other Income Statement Items
 
Equity income relates to EQM's interest in the MVP Joint Venture and represents EQM's portion of the MVP Joint Venture's AFUDC on construction of the MVP.

Other income primarily represents the equity portion of AFUDC which generally increases during periods of increased construction, and decreases during periods of reduced construction, of regulated assets. The increaseincreases for the respective years were primarily related to increased spending on the OVC project.

Interest expense increased by $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily related to a full year of $1.1interest on EQM's long-term debt issued in August 2014 and increased interest related to the AVC facilities capital lease. Interest expense increased by $29.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 wasprimarily related to increased spending on the Ohio Valley Connector project and the Jefferson compressor station expansion project. The decreaseinterest of $7.0$19.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily resulted from a decrease in applicable construction expenditures on regulated projects as the Sunrise Pipeline and Blacksville compressor station projects were turned-in-line during 2012.

For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, interest expense was $30.9 million, $1.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, interest expense primarily consisted of interest related to the AVC capital lease, of $19.9 million and interest incurred of $8.3 million on the long term debt issued in August 2014 and increased interest on EQM's credit facility borrowings and credit facility commitment fees. For the year ended December 31, 2013, interest expense primarily consisted of commitment fees paid to maintain availability under the Partnership’s credit facility and interest related to the AVC capital lease for the period of December 17, 2013 to December 31, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2012, interest expense primarily related to intercompany debt which was repaid in June 2012.borrowings.

Income tax expense was $12.5 million, $41.6 million and $36.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. From and after the IPO on July 2, 2012, the Partnership hasEQM is not been subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. Income earned prior to the IPO was subject to federal and state income tax. As previously noted, the NWV Gathering Acquisition on March 17, 2015, the Jupiter Acquisition on May 7, 2014 and the Sunrise Merger on July 22, 2013 were transferstransactions between entities under common control for which the consolidated financial statements of the PartnershipEQM have been retrospectively recast to reflect the combined entities. Accordingly, the income tax effects associated with NWV Gathering’s operations prior to the NWV Gathering Acquisition, Jupiter’s operations prior to the Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise’s operations prior to the Sunrise Merger are reflected in the consolidated financial statements as NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise were previously part of EQT’s consolidated federal tax return. The fluctuations in income tax expense between periods resulted primarily from the change in the tax status as a resulttiming of the Jupiter Acquisition, the Sunrise Mergeracquisitions and the Partnership's IPO.merger.

See “Investing Activities” and “Capital Requirements” in the “Capital Resources and Liquidity” section below for a discussion of capital expenditures.

53

Table of Contents


Non-GAAP Financial Measures
 
The PartnershipEQM defines adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense, income tax expense (if applicable) and non-cash long-term compensation expense less other non-cash adjustments (if applicable), equity income, other income, capital lease payments, and Jupiter adjusted EBITDA prior to the Jupiter Acquisition and NWV Gathering adjusted EBITDA prior to the NWV Gathering Acquisition. The PartnershipEQM defines distributable cash flow as adjusted EBITDA less interest expense, excluding capital lease interest and ongoing maintenance capital expenditures, net of reimbursements. Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow are non-GAAP supplemental financial measures that management and external users of the Partnership’sEQM’s consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies, use to assess:
the Partnership’sEQM’s operating performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships in the midstream energy industry without regard to historical cost basis or, in the case of adjusted EBITDA, financing methods;
the ability of the Partnership’sEQM’s assets to generate sufficient cash flow to make distributions to the Partnership’sEQM’s unitholders;
the Partnership’sEQM’s ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures; and
the viability of acquisitions and other capital expenditure projects and the returns on investment of various investment opportunities.
The PartnershipEQM believes that adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow provide useful information to investors in assessing the Partnership’sits financial condition and results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow should not be considered as alternatives to net income, operating income, net cash provided by operating activities or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow have important limitations as analytical tools because they exclude some, but not all, items that affect net income and net

51

Table of Contents

cash provided by operating activities. Additionally, because adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow may be defined differently by other companies in its industry, the Partnership’s definition ofEQM’s adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing their utility.the utility of the measures. Distributable cash flow should not be viewed as indicative of the actual amount of cash that the PartnershipEQM has available for distributions from operating surplus or that the Partnershipit plans to distribute.

54

Table of Contents


Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
 
The following table presents a reconciliation of the non GAAPnon-GAAP measures adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures of net income and net cash provided by operating activities.
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122015 2014 2013
(Thousands)(Thousands)
Net income$232,773
 $171,107
 $94,241
$393,450
 $266,500
 $189,791
Add:   
  
     
Interest expense30,856
 1,672
 2,944
45,661
 30,856
 1,672
Depreciation and amortization expense36,599
 25,924
 19,531
51,640
 46,054
 30,906
Income tax expense12,456
 41,572
 36,065
6,703
 31,705
 54,573
Non-cash long-term compensation expense3,368
 981
 2,282
1,467
 3,368
 981
Less:          
Non-cash adjustments(1,520) (680) (2,508)
 (1,520) (680)
Equity income(2,367) 
 
Other income(2,349) (1,242) (8,228)(5,639) (2,349) (1,242)
Capital lease payments for AVC (a)
(21,802) (1,030) 
(22,059) (21,802) (1,030)
Pre-merger capital lease payments for Sunrise (a)

 (15,201) (10,336)
 
 (15,201)
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Jupiter prior to acquisition (b)
(34,733) (103,593) (53,662)
 (34,733) (103,593)
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to NWV Gathering prior to acquisition(c)
(19,841) (62,431) (36,667)
Adjusted EBITDA$255,648
 $119,510
 $80,329
$449,015
 $255,648
 $119,510
Less:   
  
   
  
Interest expense, excluding capital lease interest(10,968) (939) (445)(22,436) (10,968) (939)
Ongoing maintenance capital expenditures, net of reimbursements (c)
(15,196) (17,200) (13,136)
Ongoing maintenance capital expenditures, net of reimbursements (d)
(20,099) (15,196) (17,200)
Distributable cash flow$229,484
 $101,371
 $66,748
$406,480
 $229,484
 $101,371
          
Net cash provided by operating activities$257,524
 $220,560
 $173,047
$463,476
 $300,546
 $260,300
Adjustments:          
Interest expense30,856
 1,672
 2,944
45,661
 30,856
 1,672
Current tax expense (benefit)12,028
 35,233
 (18,143)
Current tax expense3,705
 12,177
 16,910
Capital lease payments for AVC (a)
(21,802) (1,030) 
(22,059) (21,802) (1,030)
Pre-merger capital lease payments for Sunrise (a)

 (15,201) (10,336)
 
 (15,201)
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Jupiter prior to acquisition (b)
(34,733) (103,593) (53,662)
 (34,733) (103,593)
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to NWV Gathering prior to acquisition(c)
(19,841) (62,431) (36,667)
Other, including changes in working capital11,775
 (18,131) (13,521)(21,927) 31,035
 (2,881)
Adjusted EBITDA$255,648
 $119,510
 $80,329
$449,015
 $255,648
 $119,510

(a)  CapitalReflects capital lease payments presented aredue under the amounts incurred on an accrual basis and do not reflect the timing of actual cash payments.lease. These lease payments are generally made monthly on a one month lag.

(b)  Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Jupiter prior to acquisition for the periods presented was excluded from the Partnership’sEQM’s adjusted EBITDA calculations as these amounts were generated by Jupiter prior to the Partnership’sEQM’s acquisition; therefore, they were not amounts that could have been distributed to the Partnership’sEQM’s unitholders. Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Jupiter for 2014 prior to acquisition for the acquisition wasyears ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were calculated as net income of $20.1 million and $61.3 million, respectively, plus depreciation and amortization expense of $2.1 million and $4.7 million, respectively, plus income tax expense of $12.5 million.million and $37.5 million, respectively.

(c)  Adjusted EBITDA attributable to JupiterNWV Gathering prior to acquisition for the periods presented was excluded from EQM’s adjusted EBITDA calculations as these amounts were generated by NWV Gathering prior to EQM’s acquisition; therefore, they were not amounts that could have been distributed to EQM’s unitholders. Adjusted

55

Table of Contents

EBITDA attributable to NWV Gathering prior to acquisition for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and 2012 waswere calculated as net income of $61.3$11.1 million, $33.7 million and $31.1$18.7 million, respectively, plus depreciation and amortization expense of $4.7$2.0 million, $9.5 million and $3.8$5.0 million, respectively, plus income tax expense of $37.5$6.7 million, $19.2 million and $18.8$13.0 million, respectively.

52

Table of Contents

(c)(d) Ongoing maintenance capital expenditures are expenditures (including expenditures for the construction or development of new capital assets or the replacement, improvement or expansion of existing capital assets) made to maintain, over the long term, the Partnership’sEQM’s operating capacity or operating income. EQT has reimbursement obligations to the PartnershipEQM for certain maintenance capital expenditures under the terms of the omnibus agreement. For further explanation of these reimbursable maintenance capital expenditures, see the section below titled “Capital Requirements.” OngoingFor the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, ongoing maintenance capital expenditures, net of reimbursements, excludes ongoing maintenance of $0.3 million, $0.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, attributable to NWV Gathering and Jupiter prior to acquisition of $0.9the acquisitions.

Adjusted EBITDA increased by $193.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Adjusted EBITDA was $255.6 million, $119.5 million and $80.3 million for2015 compared to the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase$136.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, wasin each case, primarily as a result of increasedhigher operating income due to increased firm reservation fee revenues related to production development in the Marcellus Shale and the Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise Merger,acquisitions for each period, which resulted in Jupiter and Sunrise EBITDA subsequent to the transactions being reflected in adjusted EBITDA subsequent to the transactions. ForEBITDA. Distributable cash flow increased by $177.0 million for the year ended December 31, 20132015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, the increase was primarily a result of higher net income excluding the impacts of Sunrise2014 and Jupiter prior to acquisition. Distributable cash flow was $229.5 million, $101.4 million and $66.7$128.1 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These increases were mainly attributable to the increase in adjusted EBITDA partly offset by an increase in interest expense, excluding capital lease interest in 2014 compared to 2013 and in ongoing maintenance capital expenditures, net of reimbursements in 2013 compared to 2012.interest.
 
Outlook
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s principal business objective is to increase the quarterly cash distributions that it pays to its unitholders over time while ensuring the ongoing growth of its business. The PartnershipEQM believes that it is well positioned to achieve growth based on the combination of its relationship with EQT and its strategically located assets, which cover portions of the Marcellus Shaleand Utica Shales that lack substantial natural gas pipeline infrastructure. As production increases in the Partnership’s areas of operations, the PartnershipEQM believes it will havehas a competitive advantage in pursuing economically attractive organic expansion projects in its areas of operations, which the PartnershipEQM believes will be a key driver of growth in the future. The PartnershipEQM is also currently pursuing organic growth projects that are expected to provide access to markets in the Midwest, Gulf Coast and Southeast regions. Additionally, the PartnershipEQM may acquire additional midstream assets from EQT or pursue asset acquisitions from third parties. Should EQT choose to pursue midstream asset sales, it is under no contractual obligation to offer the assets to the Partnership.EQM.

The PartnershipEQM expects that the following expansion projects will allow it to capitalize on drilling activity by EQT and other third-partythird party producers:

Jupiter Gathering Expansion. The Jupiter gathering expansion, which is fully subscribed, is expected to result in total system compression capacity of 775 MMcf per day and is expected to be completed by year-end 2015. The Partnership expects capital expenditures of approximately $100 million in 2015 related to this expansion.

Ohio Valley Connector. The Ohio Valley Connector (OVC) includesOVC is a 36-mile37-mile pipeline that will extend the Partnership'sEQM's transmission and storage system from northern West Virginia to Clarington, Ohio, at which point it will interconnect with the Rockies Express Pipeline and the Texas Eastern Pipeline. In December 2014, the Partnership submitted the OVC certificate application, which also includes related Equitrans transmission expansion projects, to the FERCmay interconnect with other pipelines and anticipates receiving the certificate in the second half of 2015. Subject to FERC approval, construction is scheduled to begin in the third quarter of 2015 and the pipeline is expected to be in-service by mid-year 2016.liquidity points. The OVC will provide approximately 850 BBtu per day of transmission capacity with an aggregate compression of approximately 38,000 horsepower and the 36-mile pipeline portion is estimated to cost approximately $300$350 million to $380 million, of which $120$210 million to $130$220 million is expected to be spent in 2015. The Partnership2016. EQT has entered into a 20-year precedent agreement with EQM for a total of 650 BBtu per day of firm transmission capacity on the OVC. EQM received its FERC certificate to construct and operate the OVC on December 30, 2015 and construction began in January 2016. EQM expects the OVC to be in-service by year-end 2016.

Equitrans Transmission Expansion ProjectsRange Resources Header Pipeline Project. In conjunctionJuly 2015, EQM announced its agreement with the OVC and other projects, the Partnership also plansa subsidiary of Range Resources to begin several multi-year transmission expansion projectsconstruct a natural gas header pipeline in southwestern Pennsylvania to support the continued growth of the Marcellus and Utica development. The projects include pipeline looping, compression installation and new pipeline segments, which combined areis expected to increase transmission capacity bycost approximately 1.0 Bcf$250 million and is contracted to provide 550 MMcf per day of firm capacity backed by year-enda ten-year firm capacity reservation commitment. EQM plans to complete the project in two phases, with phase one expected to be in-service during the second half of 2016 and phase two during the first half of 2017. The PartnershipEQM expects to invest approximately $195 million to $205 million on the project in 2016.

NWV Gathering and Jupiter Development Areas. EQM expects to invest a total of approximately $400$370 million, of which approximately $25$95 million to $105 million is expected to be spent during 2015.2016, related to expansion in the NWV Gathering development area. These expenditures are part of a fully subscribed expansion project expected

56

Table of Contents

to raise total firm gathering capacity in the NWV Gathering development area to 640 MMcf per day by mid-year 2017. EQM also plans to invest approximately $20 million in the Jupiter development area to install gathering pipeline that will extend the gathering system to include additional EQT Production development areas in Greene County, Pennsylvania.

Transmission Expansion Projects. EQM is evaluating several multi-year transmission capacity expansion projects to support production growth in the Marcellus and Utica Shales that could total an additional 1.5 Bcf per day of capacity by year-end 2018. The projects may include additional compression, pipeline looping and new header pipelines. EQM expects to spend approximately $25 million on these expansion projects during 2016.

Mountain Valley Pipeline. In 2015, the Partnership expects to assume EQT's interest in Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC,The MVP Joint Venture is a joint venture with an affiliateaffiliates of each of NextEra Energy, Inc., ConEd, WGL Holdings, Inc.,Vega Energy Partners, Ltd. and RGC Resources, Inc. As of February 11, 2016, EQM owned a 45.5% interest in the MVP Joint Venture and had assumed the role of operator of the MVP to be constructed by the joint venture. The estimated 300-mile Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP)MVP is currently targeted at 42 inches in diameter and a capacity of 2.0 Bcf per day, and will

53

Table of Contents

extend from the Partnership'sEQM's existing transmission and storage system in Wetzel County, West Virginia to Pittsylvania County, Virginia. The Partnership expects to ownAs currently designed, the largest interest in the joint venture and will operate the MVP. The MVP is estimated to cost a total of $2.5$3.0 billion to $3.5 billion, excluding AFUDC, with the PartnershipEQM funding its proportionate share through capital contributions made to the joint venture. In 2015, the Partnership's2016, EQM expects to provide capital contributions are expected to beof approximately $75$150 million to $85 million and will bethe MVP Joint Venture, primarily in support of material orders, environmental and land assessments and engineering design work and materials.work. Expenditures are expected to increase substantially as construction commences, with the bulk of the expenditures expected to be made in 2017 and 2018. On January 21, 2016, affiliates of ConEd acquired a 12.5% interest in the MVP Joint Venture and entered into 20-year firm capacity commitments for approximately 0.25 Bcf per day on both the MVP and EQM’s transmission system. ConEd has the right to terminate its purchase of the interest in the MVP Joint Venture and be reimbursed for the purchase price and all capital contributions it makes to the MVP Joint Venture for a period ending no later than December 31, 2016. The joint ventureMVP Joint Venture has secured a total of 2.0 Bcf per day of 20-year firm capacity commitments, at 20-year termsincluding a 1.29 Bcf per day firm capacity commitment by EQT, and is currently in negotiation with additional shippers who have expressed interest in the MVP project. As a result,The MVP Joint Venture submitted the final project scope, including pipe diameter and total capacity, has not yet been determined; however, the voluntary pre-filing process withMVP certificate application to the FERC began in October 2014. The pipeline, which is subject2015 and anticipates receiving the certificate in the fourth quarter of 2016. Subject to FERC approval, construction is scheduled to begin shortly thereafter and the pipeline is expected to be in-service during the fourth quarter of 2018.

See further discussion of capital expenditures in the “Capital Requirements” section below.

The Partnership’sCommodity Prices    

EQM’s business is dependent on the continued availability of natural gas production and reserves in its areas of operation. Low prices for natural gas, including those resulting from regional basis differentials, could adversely affect development of additional reserves and production that is accessible by the Partnership’sEQM’s pipeline and storage assets. For example, the average daily prices for NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas ranged from a high of $3.23 per MMBtu to a low of $1.76 per MMBtu from January 1, 2015 through February 10, 2016, and the average daily prices for NYMEX West Texas Intermediate crude oil ranged from a high of $107.26$61.43 per barrel to a low of $44.45$26.55 per barrel from January 1, 2014 through February 9, 2015. Average daily prices for NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas ranged from a high of $6.15 per MMBtu to a low of $2.58 per MMBtu from January 1, 2014 through February 9, 2015.during the same period. The markets will likely continue to be volatile in the future. In addition, lower natural gas prices could cause producers to determine in the future that drilling activities in areas outside of the Partnership’sEQM’s current areas of operation are strategically more attractive to them. For example, inIn response to recent commodity price decreases, a number of large natural gas producers have recently announced their intention to re-evaluate and/or reduce their drilling programs in certain areas, including the Appalachian Basin. In December 2015, EQT announced a 2016 capital expenditure forecast for well development of $820 million, which is 51% lower than EQT's 2015 capital expenditures for well development. EQT may further reduce its capital spending in the future based on commodity prices or other factors. Unless EQM is successful in attracting significant unaffiliated third party customers, its ability to maintain or increase the capacity subscribed and volumes transported under service arrangements on its transmission and storage system as well as the volumes gathered on its gathering systems will be dependent on receiving consistent or increasing commitments from EQT. While EQT has dedicated acreage to EQM, and has entered into long-term firm transmission and gathering contracts on EQM's systems, EQT may determine in the future that drilling in areas outside of EQM's current areas of operations is strategically more attractive to it and it is under no contractual obligation to continue to develop its acreage dedicated to EQM.

The PartnershipEQM believes the high percentage of its revenues derived from reservation charges under long-term, fixed-fee contracts will mitigate the risk of revenue fluctuations due to changes in near-term supply and demand conditions and commodity prices. For more information see “Risk Factors-Risks Inherent in the Partnership’sOur Business - Any significant decrease in

57

Table of Contents

production of natural gas in the Partnership’sour areas of operation could adversely affect itsour business and operating results and reduce itsour distributable cash flow.flow" included in Item 1A, "Risk Factors."

Capital Resources and Liquidity
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s principal liquidity requirements are to finance its operations, fund capital expenditures and acquisitions, make cash distributions and satisfy any indebtedness obligations. The Partnership’sEQM’s ability to meet these liquidity requirements will depend on its ability to generate cash in the future as well as its ability to raise capital in the banking, capital and other markets. From and after the IPO, the Partnership’sEQM’s available sources of liquidity include cash generated from operations, borrowing under the Partnership’sEQM's credit facility, cash on hand, debt offerings and issuances of additional EQM partnership units.

Operating Activities
 
Net cash provided by operating activities during 2014was $257.5$463.5 million, compared to $220.6 $300.5 million and $260.3 million for 2013.the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities for these periods was driven by higher operating income, for which contributing factors are discussed in the “Executive Overview” section herein, and timing of payments between the two periods.

Net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $220.6 million compared to $173.0 million for 2012. The increase in operating receipts was primarily due to increased firm transmission service, increased fees associated with transported volumes in excess of firm capacity and increased gathered volumes, all related to production development in the Marcellus Shale. These increases were partly offset by a decrease year-over-year related to the 2012 cash receipt from EQT related to its use of Sunrise’s depreciation deductions prior to the Sunrise Merger when Sunrise was included in the consolidated tax return of EQT.
 
Investing Activities
 
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $372.1$994.7 million for 2015 as compared to $486.3 million for 2014. The increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of NWV Gathering net assets from EQT, the purchase of the Preferred Interest, increased capital expenditures and the acquisition of EQT's interest in the MVP Joint Venture as well as the capital contributions to the MVP Joint Venture. See discussion of capital expenditures in the "Capital Requirements" section below.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $486.3 million for 2014 as compared to $121.4$283.0 million for 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of the Jupiter net assets from EQT as well as the following expansion

54

Table of Contents

projects: the Jupiter gathering expansion, the Ohio Valley Connector project, the Range Resources project, the Jefferson compressor station expansion project and the Antero project.
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $121.4 million for 2013 as compared to $214.9 million for 2012. The 2013increased capital expenditures primarily related to the Jupiter gathering system, the Low Pressure East expansion project and the Jefferson compressor station expansion project. The 2012 capital expenditures primarily related to the Sunrise Pipeline and Blacksville compressor station projects.

expenditures. See further discussion of capital expenditures in the “Capital Requirements” section below.
 
Financing Activities
 
Cash flowsNet cash provided by financing activities were $222.4totaled $755.9 million in 2014 for 2015 as compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $130.8$293.6 million in 2013. During the second quarter of 2014, the Partnership completed an underwritten public offering of 12,362,500 common units. During the third quarter of 2014, the Partnership issued 4.00% Senior Notes due August 2024 in the aggregate principal amount of $500 million.for 2014. Cash inflows in 2015 from equity offerings and net credit facility borrowings were partly offset by cash payments for the NWV Gathering Acquisition in excess of net assets acquired and distributions to unitholders. Cash inflows in 2014 were primarily generated from the equity and debt offerings, net of offering costs totaling $1.4 billionand were largelypartly offset by cash payments for the Jupiter Acquisition in excess of approximately $1.0 billion,net assets acquired, distributions to unitholders of $119.6 million, and the Sunrise Merger deferred consideration payment of $110.0 million.payment.

Cash flowsNet cash provided by financing activities totaled $293.6 million for 2014 as compared to net cash used in financing activities totaled $130.8of $9.0 million for in 2013. Cash inflows in 2013 as compared to $91.9 million of cash flows providedwere primarily driven by financing activities for the same period of 2012. In July 2013, the Partnership received net proceeds from itsan equity offering of approximately $529.4 million, after deductingand net contributions from EQT related to the underwriters’ discountNWV Gathering and offering expenses. These funds were used to pay Sunrise Merger consideration to EQT of $507.5 million in July 2013. Additionally in 2013, the Partnership paid cash distributions to unitholders of $66.2 million, Jupiter made pre-acquisition advances to affiliates of $60.8 million and Sunrise paid pre-merger distributions to EQT of $31.4 million. In 2012, the Partnership received net proceeds from the initial public offering of approximately $276.8 million, after deducting the underwriters’ discount and offering expenses. Approximately $230.9 million of the proceeds were distributed to EQT, $12.0 million was retained by the Partnership to replenish amounts distributed by Equitrans to EQTentities prior to the IPO, $32.0 million was retained by the Partnership to pre-fund certain maintenance capital expenditures and $1.9 million was used by the Partnership to pay credit facility origination fees associated with its credit facility. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Partnership made its first cash distribution to unitholders of $12.4 million.

Prior to the IPO in 2012, the Partnership had financingacquisitions. These cash inflows of $253.5 million for capital contributions from EQT and financingwere more than offset by cash outflows of $10.2 million for distributions paid to EQT, $49.7 millionin 2013 related to reimbursements to EQT and $135.2 million to retire long-term intercompany debt to EQT. Prior to the IPO, and to the Sunrise Merger and the Jupiter acquisition in the case of Sunrise and Jupiter, certain advancespayment to or from affiliates were viewed as financing transactions as the Partnership, Sunrise or Jupiter would have otherwise obtained or repaid demand notes or term loans from EQT to fund these transactions. Subsequent to the IPO, Sunrise Merger and Jupiter Acquisition, respectively, these transactions reflect services rendered on behalf of these entities by EQT and its affiliates for operating expenses and are settled monthly. Therefore, these are classified as operating activities subsequentdistributions to the IPO, the Sunrise Merger and the Jupiter Acquisition.unitholders.

Capital Requirements
 
The transmission, storage and gathering businesses are capital intensive, requiring significant investment to develop new facilities and to maintain and upgrade existing operations. The table below table presents capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012.2013.
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
(Thousands)(Thousands)
Expansion capital expenditures(a) $221,839
 $74,883
 $191,896
 $344,908
 $329,206
 $241,254
Maintenance capital expenditures:            
Ongoing maintenance 15,706
 21,267
 24,372
 27,928
 16,493
 22,185
Funded regulatory compliance (a)
 7,603
 12,093
 6,993
 3,379
 7,603
 12,093
Total maintenance capital expenditures 23,309
 33,360
 31,365
 31,307
 24,096
 34,278
Total capital expenditures (b)
 $245,148
 $108,243
 $223,261
 $376,215
 $353,302
 $275,532

5558

Table of Contents

(a) Amounts included as funded regulatory complianceExpansion capital expenditures for periods priordo not include capital contributions made to the IPOMVP Joint Venture. In 2015, EQM paid approximately $74.7 million for its acquisition of $0.2 million in 2012 were included for comparative purposes and were not includedEQT's ownership interest in the Partnership’s estimate of $32 million for the initiatives identified priorMVP Joint Venture and subsequent capital contributions to the IPO.MVP Joint Venture, net of sales of interests in the MVP Joint Venture to other parties.

(b) The PartnershipEQM accrues capital expenditures when work has been completed but the associated bills have not yet been paid. These accrued amounts are excluded from capital expenditures on the consolidated statements of cash flows until they are paid in a subsequent period. Accrued capital expenditures were $46.1$18.3 million, $5.2$51.1 million and $18.4$16.3 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. Additionally, the PartnershipEQM capitalizes certain labor overhead costs which include a portion of non-cash equity-based compensation. These non-cash capital expenditures in the table above were less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.3 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2014.2015 and 2014, respectively. There were no amounts capitalized for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.2013.

Expansion capital expenditures are expenditures incurred for capital improvements that the PartnershipEQM expects to increase its operating income or operating capacity over the long term. In 2015 and 2014, expansion capital expenditures primarily related to the following projects: the OVC, the Jupiter gathering expansion, the Ohio Valley Connector project, the Range Resources project, the Jefferson compressor station expansion project and NWV Gathering expansions, the Antero project.transmission projects and several projects for Range Resources. In 2013, expansion capital expenditures primarily related to the following projects: the NWV Gathering and Jupiter gathering system,expansions and the Low Pressure East expansion project. Part of the NWV Gathering expansion was placed into service in the fourth quarter of 2015 which increased the total firm gathering capacity in that area to 560 MMcf per day. The Jupiter gathering expansion was placed into service partly in the fourth quarter of 2014 and was completed in the fourth quarter of 2015. Combined, the expansion increased the total firm gathering capacity in the Jupiter development area to 775 MMcf per day. The first Antero transmission project was placed into service during the fourth quarter of 2014 and the Jefferson compressor stationsecond Antero transmission project was placed into service in the second quarter of 2015. Combined, these Antero transmission projects added approximately 200 MMcf per day of capacity to EQM's transmission system. The first Range Resources project was completed in the fourth quarter of 2014 and added approximately 100 MMcf per day of capacity to EQM's transmission system. The second Range Resources project was completed in the fourth quarter of 2015 and added gathering infrastructure to support Range Resources' production development in eastern Washington County, Pennsylvania. The Low Pressure East expansion project. In 2012, expansion capital expenditures were primarily related toproject was placed into service in the Sunrise Pipelinefourth quarter of 2013 and Blacksville compressor station projects.added approximately 150 MMcf per day of capacity on EQM's transmission system.
 
Maintenance capital expenditures are expenditures made to maintain, over the long term, the Partnership’sEQM’s operating capacity or operating income. Examples of maintenance capital expenditures are expenditures to repair, refurbish and replace pipelines, to connect new wells to maintain throughput, to maintain equipment reliability, integrity and safety and to address environmental laws and regulations.

Ongoing maintenance capital expenditures are all maintenance capital expenditures other than funded regulatory compliance capital expenditures described in this section.the next paragraph. The period over period changes in ongoing maintenance capital expenditures primarily relaterelated to the timing of projects. Included in these amounts for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and 2012 were $7.5 million, $0.5 million $3.1 million and $4.2$3.1 million, respectively, of maintenance capital expenditures for which the PartnershipEQM was reimbursed by EQT under the terms of the omnibus agreement. Under the omnibus agreement, for a period of ten years after the closing of the IPO, EQT has agreed to reimburse the PartnershipEQM for plugging and abandonment expenditures for certain identified wells of EQT and third parties. Additionally, EQT has agreed to reimburse the PartnershipEQM for bare steel replacement capital expenditures in the event that ongoing maintenance capital expenditures (other than capital expenditures associated with plugging and abandonment liabilities to be reimbursed by EQT) exceed $17.2 million (with respect to the Partnership’sEQM’s assets owned at the time of the IPO) in any year. If such ongoing maintenance capital expenditures and bare steel replacement capital expenditures exceed $17.2 million during a year, EQT will reimburse the PartnershipEQM for the lesser of (i) the amount of bare steel replacement capital expenditures during such year and (ii) the amount by which such ongoing capital expenditures and bare steel replacement capital expenditures exceeds $17.2 million. This bare steel replacement reimbursement obligation is capped at an aggregate amount of $31.5 million over the ten years following the IPO. Since the IPO, the PartnershipEQM has been reimbursed approximately $7.8$15.4 million by EQT. Amounts reimbursed are recorded as capital contributions when received.

Funded regulatory compliance capital expenditures are previously identified maintenance capital expenditures necessary to comply with certain regulatory and other legal requirements. Prior to the IPO, the PartnershipEQM identified two specific regulatory compliance initiatives which the PartnershipEQM expected to require it to expend approximately $32 million. The PartnershipEQM retained approximately $32 million from the net proceeds of the IPO to fund these expenditures. The specific initiatives of this program are to install remote valve and pressure monitoring equipment on the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage lines and to relocate certain valve operators above ground and apply corrosion protection. The period over period changes primarily relate to the timing of projects. Since the IPO in 2012, funded regulatory compliance capital expenditures have totaled $26.5$29.9 million.

59

Table of Contents

    
In 2015,2016, expansion capital expenditures includingand capital contributions to the MVP capital contributions,Joint Venture are expected to total $380be approximately $695 million to $410$725 million and ongoing maintenance capital expenditures net of expected reimbursements, are expected to be approximately $30 million. The Partnership’s$25 million, net of reimbursements. EQM’s future expansion capital expendituresinvestments may vary significantly from period to period based on the available investment opportunities.opportunities and will grow substantially in future periods for the OVC project, the Range Resources Header Pipeline project and capital contributions to the MVP Joint Venture. Maintenance related capital expenditures are also expected to vary quarter to quarter. The PartnershipEQM expects to fund future capital expenditures primarily through cash on hand, cash generated from operations, availability under the Partnership’sits credit facility, debt offerings and the issuance of additional EQM partnership units. The PartnershipEQM does not forecast capital expenditures associated with potential midstream projects not committed as of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



56

Table of Contents

Credit Facility and DebtBorrowings
 
Credit Facility. In February 2014, the Partnership entered into an amended and restatedEQM has a $750 million credit facility that replaced its prior credit facility and increased the borrowing capacity to $750 million. The amended credit facility will expireexpires in February 2019.2019 and had $299 million outstanding as of December 31, 2015. The credit facility is available to fund working capital requirements and capital expenditures, to purchase assets, to pay distributions, and to repurchase units and for general partnership purposes. Subject to certain terms and conditions, the credit facility has an accordion feature that allows the PartnershipEQM to increase the available revolving borrowings under the facility by up to an additional $250 million. In addition, the credit facility includes a sublimit up to $75 million for same-day swing line advances and a sublimit up to $150 million for letters of credit. The PartnershipEQM has the right to request that one or more lenders make term loans to it under the credit facility subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, which term loans will be secured by cash and qualifying investment grade securities. The Partnership’sEQM’s obligations under the revolving portion of the credit facility are unsecured.

The Partnership’sEQM’s credit facility contains various provisions that, if not complied with, could result in termination of the credit facility, require early payment of amounts outstanding or similar actions. The covenants and events of default under the credit facility relate to maintenance of permitted leverage ratio, limitations on transactions with affiliates, limitations on restricted payments, insolvency events, nonpayment of scheduled principal or interest payments, acceleration of and certain other defaults under other financial obligations and change of control provisions. Under the credit facility, the PartnershipEQM is required to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of not more than 5.00 to 1.00 (or, not more than 5.50 to 1.00 for certain measurement periods following the consummation of certain acquisitions). As of December 31, 2014, the Partnership2015, EQM was in compliance with all credit facilitydebt provisions and covenants.

In January 2015, the Partnership amended its credit facility to, among other things: exclude MVP from the definitions of “Consolidated Debt”, “Consolidated EBITDA”, “Consolidated Subsidiary” and “Subsidiary”; permit MVP to incur non-recourse debt which may be secured by a pledge of the interests of MVP without affecting the calculation of the consolidated leverage ratio in the credit facility, and release the subsidiary guarantors from their guarantee of obligations under the credit facility.

Senior Notes. During the third quarter of 2014, the Partnership issued 4.00% Senior Notes due August 2024 in the aggregate principal amount of $500 million (the 4.00% Senior Notes). Net proceeds from the offering of $492.3 million were used to repay the outstanding borrowings under the Partnership’s credit facility and for general partnership purposes. The indenture governing the 4.00% Senior Notes contains covenants that limit the Partnership’s ability to, among other things, incur certain liens securing indebtedness, engage in certain sale and leaseback transactions, and enter into certain consolidations, mergers, conveyances, transfers or leases of all or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets. The payment obligations under the 4.00% Senior Notes were unconditionally guaranteed by each of the Partnership’s subsidiaries that guaranteed the Partnership’s credit facility (other than EQT Midstream Finance Corporation), which entities are referred to as "the Senior Note Guarantors." In connection with the release of the subsidiary guarantors from their guarantees under the credit facility in January 2015, the Senior Note Guarantors were released from their guarantees of the 4.00% Senior Notes.

Security Ratings

The table below sets forth the credit ratings for debt instruments of the PartnershipEQM at December 31, 2014.February 10, 2016. Changes in credit ratings may affect the Partnership’sEQM’s cost of future borrowingsshort-term and long-term debt (including interest rates and fees under its credit facility), collateral requirements under joint venture arrangements and construction contracts and access to the credit markets.
Rating Service Senior Notes Outlook
Moody’s Investors Service (Moody's) Ba1 StableUnder Review
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P) BBB- Stable
Fitch Ratings (Fitch) BBB- Stable
    
The Partnership’sEQM’s credit ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. The PartnershipEQM cannot ensure that a rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a credit rating agency if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant. On January 25, 2016, Moody’s announced that it had placed three midstream partnerships, including EQM, under review for a downgrade primarily due to their affiliations with sponsoring exploration and production companies. If theMoody's or another credit rating agencies downgrade the Partnership’sagency downgrades EQM’s ratings, particularly below investment grade, the Partnership’sEQM’s access to the capital markets may be limited, borrowing costs could increase, counterpartiesEQM may requestbe required to provide additional credit assurances in support of commercial agreements such as joint venture agreements and construction contracts, the amount of which may be substantial, and the potential pool of investors and funding sources may decrease. In order to be considered investment grade, a company must be rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, BBB- or higher by S&P, Baa3 or higher by Moody’s or BBB- or higher by Fitch. Anything below these ratings, including EQM's credit rating of Ba1 by Moody's, is considered non-investment grade.


5760

Table of Contents

EQM At the Market Equity Program

During the third quarter of 2015, EQM established the $750 million ATM Program. As of February 11, 2016, EQM had approximately $663 million in remaining capacity under the program.

Distributions
 
On January 22, 2015, the Partnership announced that21, 2016, the Board of Directors of its general partnerthe EQM General Partner declared a cash distribution to the Partnership’sEQM's unitholders of $0.58 per unit related tofor the fourth quarter of 2014.2015 of $0.71 per common unit, $1.3 million to EQGP related to its general partner units and $16.2 million to EQGP related to its incentive distribution rights. The cash distribution is payablewill be paid on February 13, 201512, 2016 to unitholders of record at the close of business on February 3, 2015. In connection with this cash distribution, EQT will receive approximately $5.2 million related to its incentive distribution rights.1, 2016.
 
Schedule of Contractual Obligations

The following represents EQM's contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015. Purchase obligations exclude EQM’s future capital contributions to the MVP Joint Venture and purchase obligations of the MVP Joint Venture.
 Total 2015 2016-2017 2018-2019 2020+ Total 2016 2017-2018 2019-2020 2021+
 (Thousands) (Thousands)
Long-term debt $500,000
 $
 $
 $
 $500,000
Capital lease obligation (a)
 $403,081
 $21,383
 $38,677
 $38,262
 $304,759
 383,718
 20,220
 40,691
 35,831
 286,976
Long-term debt 500,000
 
 
 
 500,000
Interest payments 191,667
 20,000
 40,000
 40,000
 91,667
Credit facility borrowings (b)
 299,000
 299,000
 
 
 
Interest payments on long-term debt (c)
 171,667
 20,000
 40,000
 40,000
 71,667
Purchase obligations 17,146
 17,146
 
 
 
 18,864
 18,864
 
 
 
Total contractual obligations $1,111,894
 $58,529
 $78,677
 $78,262
 $896,426
 $1,373,249
 $358,084
 $80,691
 $75,831
 $858,643
 
(a)        Represents the future projected payments associated with the AVC capital lease obligation (including interest) as of December 31, 2014.2015.

(b) Credit facility borrowings were repaid on February 8, 2016 and therefore were classified as due in 2016.

(c) Interest payments exclude interest due related to the credit facility borrowings as the interest rate on the credit facility agreement is variable.
 
Commitments and Contingencies
 
In the ordinary course of business, various legal and regulatory claims and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Partnership.EQM.  While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the PartnershipEQM is unable to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of such claims and proceedings. The PartnershipEQM accrues legal and other direct costs related to loss contingencies when actually incurred. The PartnershipEQM has established reserves it believes to be appropriate for pending matters, and after consultation with counsel and giving appropriate consideration to available insurance, the PartnershipEQM believes that the ultimate outcome of any matter currently pending against the Partnershipit will not materially affect its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
The Partnership does not haveAs of February 11, 2016, EQM had issued a $91 million performance guarantee in favor of the MVP Joint Venture to provide performance assurances for MVP Holdco's obligations to fund its proportionate share of the construction budget for the MVP. Upon the FERC’s initial release to begin construction of the MVP, EQM's guarantee will terminate, and EQM will be obligated to issue a new guarantee in an amount equal to 33% of MVP Holdco’s remaining obligations to make capital contributions to the MVP Joint Venture in connection with the then remaining construction budget, less any off-balance sheet arrangements.credit assurances issued by any affiliate of EQM under such affiliate's precedent agreement with the MVP Joint Venture.

See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of EQM’s commitments and contingencies.


61

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014,EQM's recently issued accounting standards are described in Note 1 to the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued a converged standard on revenue recognition to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). To meet those objectives, the FASB is amending the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The revenue standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on itsconsolidated financial statements and related disclosures.included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates
 
The Partnership’sEQM’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The discussion and analysis of the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements and results of operations are based upon EQT Midstream Partners’ Consolidated Financial Statements,EQM's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.  The preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  The following critical accounting policies, which were reviewed by the Partnership’sEQM’s Audit Committee, relate to the Partnership’sits more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Property, Plant and Equipment: Determination of depreciation expense requires judgment regarding the estimated useful lives and salvage values of property, plant and equipment. In addition, anyEQM has not historically experienced material changes in its results of operations from changes in the estimated useful lives or salvage values of property, plant and equipment although these estimates are reviewed periodically, including each time EQM files with the FERC for a change in transmission and storage rates. Determination of internal costs capitalized requires judgment as to the percent of time spent on capitalized projects for the capitalization of costs such as salaries, benefits and other indirect costs. EQM believes that the accounting estimates related to depreciation expense and capitalization of internal costs are "critical accounting estimates" because they are susceptible to change period to period. These assumptions affect the gross property, plant and equipment balances and the amount of depreciation and operating expense and would have an impact on the results of operations and financial position if changed. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Impairments: Any accounting estimate related to asset impairment of property, plant and equipment or investments in unconsolidated entities requires EQM's management to make assumptions about future cash flows, over future years.discount rates, fair value of investments and whether losses in value of its investments are other than temporary. Management’s assumptions about

58

Table of Contents

future cash flows require significant judgment because actual operating levels have fluctuated in the past and are expected to do so in the future. ManagementAdditionally, management's assumptions about the fair value of investments in nonconsolidated affiliates require significant judgment because EQM's investments are not traded on an active market. EQM has not historically had indications of impairments. However, EQM believes that the accounting estimates related to depreciation expense and impairment are "critical accounting estimates" because they require assumptions that are susceptible to change period to period. These assumptions affect the amount of depreciation and anyAny potential impairment which would have an impact on the results of operations and financial position. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements for additional information.

Contingencies and Asset Retirement Obligations:Contingencies: The PartnershipEQM is involved in various regulatory and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. A liability is recorded for contingencies based upon the Partnership’sEQM’s assessment that a loss is probable and that the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The PartnershipEQM considers many factors in making these assessments, including history and specifics of each matter. Estimates are developed in consultation with legal counsel and are based upon an analysis of potential results.

The Partnership operates and maintains its transmission and storage system and its gathering system and intends to do so as long as supply and demand for natural gas exists, which is expected for the foreseeable future. Therefore, the Partnership believes that it cannot reasonably estimate the asset retirement obligations for its system assets as these assets have indeterminate lives.
The Partnership    EQM believes that the accounting estimates related to contingencies and asset retirement obligations are “critical accounting estimates” because it must assess the probability of loss related to contingencies and the expected amount and timing of asset retirement obligations. In addition, the Partnership must determine the estimated present value of future liabilities.contingencies. Future results of operations for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by changes in the assumptions.

Equity-Based Compensation: The Partnership's equity-based compensation will be paid in units; therefore, the Partnership treats these awarded units as equity awards. Awards that contain a market condition require the Partnership to obtain a valuation. Significant assumptions made in valuing the Partnership’s awards include the market price of units at payout date, total unitholder return threshold to be achieved, volatility, risk-free rate, term, dividend yield and forfeiture rate.

The Partnership believes that the accounting estimates related to equity-based compensation are “critical accounting estimates” because the assumptions affecting the valuation of the awards including the market price and volatility of the Partnership’s common units could have a significant impact on the expense recognized. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Partnership's equity-based compensation.

Revenue Recognition: Revenue from the gathering of natural gas is generally recognized when the service is provided. Revenue related to thesegathering services provided but not yet billed areis estimated each month. These estimates are generally based on contract data and preliminary throughput and allocation measurements. Final bills for the current month are billed and collected in the following month. Reservation revenues related to firm contracted capacity are recognized ratably over the contract period based on the contracted volume regardless of the amount of natural gas that is transported.transported or gathered. Transmission and storage revenue from usage chargesfees is recorded on actual volumes subject to prior period adjustments.

The PartnershipEQM records a monthly provision for accounts receivable that are considered to be uncollectible. In order to calculate the appropriate monthly provision, a historical rate of accounts receivable losses as a percentage of total revenue is utilized. This historical rate is applied to the current revenues on a monthly basis and is updated periodically based on events that may change the rate, such as a significant change to the natural gas industry or to the economy as a whole. Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis using the assumptions that apply at that time. While EQM has not historically experienced material bad debt expense, declines in the market price for natural gas combined with the increase in third party

62

Table of Contents

customers on EQM's systems may result in a greater exposure to potential losses than management's current estimates. As of December 31, 2015, EQM had third party accounts receivable of $17.1 million and an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.2 million.

The PartnershipEQM believes that the accounting estimates related to revenue recognition and the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable are “critical accounting policies” because estimated volumes are subject to change based on actual measurements including prior period adjustments andadjustments. In addition, EQM believes that the accounting estimates related to the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable are “critical accounting policies” because the underlying assumptions used for the allowance can change from period to period which could potentially have a material impact on the results of operations and on working capital. In addition, the actual mix of customers and their ability to pay may vary significantly from management’smanagement's estimates and maywhich could impact the collectability of customer accounts.

59

Table These accounting estimates could potentially have a material impact on the results of Contentsoperations and financial position.


Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
Changes in interest rates affect the amount of interest the PartnershipEQM earns on cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and the interest rates the PartnershipEQM pays on borrowings onunder its credit facility. The Partnership'sEQM's long-term borrowings are fixed rate and thus do not expose the PartnershipEQM to fluctuations in its results of operations or liquidity from changes in market interest rates. Changes in interest rates do affect the fair value of the Partnership'sEQM's fixed rate debt. See Note 79 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements for further discussion of the Partnership'sEQM's borrowings and Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements1 for afurther discussion of fair value measurements. The PartnershipEQM may from time to time hedge the interest on portions of its borrowings under the credit facility in order to manage risks associated with floating interest rates.
 
Credit Risk
 
The PartnershipEQM is exposed to credit risk. Credit risk is the risk that the PartnershipEQM may incur a loss if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract. The PartnershipEQM manages its exposure to credit risk associated with customers through credit analysis, credit approval, credit limits and monitoring procedures. For certain transactions, the PartnershipEQM may request letters of credit, cash collateral, prepayments or guarantees as forms of credit support. The Partnership’sEQM’s FERC tariff requires tariff customers that do not meet specified credit standards to provide three months of credit support; however, the PartnershipEQM is exposed to credit risk beyond this three month period when its tariff does not require its customers to provide additional credit support. For some of the Partnership’sEQM’s more recent long-term contracts associated with system expansions, it has entered into negotiated credit agreements that provide for enhanced forms of credit support if certain credit standards are not met. The PartnershipEQM has historically experienced only minimal credit losses in connection with its receivables. Approximately 42% and 41% and 59% of the Partnership’sEQM’s third party accounts receivable balances of $17.1 million and $16.5 million as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively, represent amounts due from marketers. The PartnershipEQM is also exposed to the credit risk of EQT, its largest customer. In connection with theEQM's IPO in 2012, EQT guaranteed all payment obligations, up to a maximum of $50 million, due and payable to Equitrans by EQT Energy, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT and one of Equitrans’ largest customers. The EQT guaranty will terminate on November 30, 2023 unless terminated earlier by EQT upon 10 days written notice. At December 31, 2014, EQT’s public senior debt had an investment grade credit rating.

Other market risksMarket Risks

The Partnership has a $750 million revolving credit facility that expires in February 2019. TheEQM's credit facility is underwritten by a syndicate of financial institutions, each of which is obligated to fund its pro-rata portion of any borrowings by the Partnership. As of December 31, 2014, the Partnership had no loans or letters of credit outstanding under its credit facility.EQM. No one lender of the large group of18 financial institutions in the syndicate holds more than 10% of the facility. The Partnership’sEQM’s large syndicate group and relatively low percentage of participation by each lender is expected to limit the Partnership’sEQM’s exposure to problems or consolidation in the banking industry.

63

Table of Contents


Item 8.       Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
 
Page 
Reference
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Statements of Consolidated Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20142015
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20142015
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142015 and 20132014
Statements of Consolidated Partners’ Capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20142015
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

6064

Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
The Board of Directors of EQT Midstream Services, LLC and Unitholders of
EQT Midstream Partners, LP
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EQT Midstream Partners, LP (including its Predecessor as defined in Note 1 and collectively, the Partnership)(EQM) as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, and the related statements of consolidated operations, cash flows and partners’ capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014.2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’sEQM’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of EQT Midstream Partners, LP at December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014,2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), EQT Midstream Partners, LP’sLP's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 12, 201511, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 

/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
February 12, 201511, 2016 

6165

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
The Board of Directors of EQT Midstream Services, LLC and Unitholders of
EQT Midstream Partners, LP
 
 
We have audited EQT Midstream Partners, LP’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). EQT Midstream Partners, LP’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, EQT Midstream Partners, LP maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of EQT Midstream Partners, LP as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, and the related statements of consolidated operations, cash flows and partners’ capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20142015 and our report dated February 12, 201511, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
February 12, 201511, 2016 


6266

Table of Contents

EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
 STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS(a) 
 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2014 2013 20122015 2014 2013
(Thousands, except per unit amounts)(Thousands, except per unit amounts)
Operating revenues (b)
$392,959
 $303,712
 $200,005
$614,134
 $476,547
 $354,001
Operating expenses:   
  
   
  
Operating and maintenance (c)
45,434
 35,578
 34,250
68,261
 55,276
 42,727
Selling, general and administrative (c)
37,190
 29,101
 21,202
56,425
 48,505
 35,574
Depreciation and amortization36,599
 25,924
 19,531
51,640
 46,054
 30,906
Total operating expenses119,223
 90,603
 74,983
176,326
 149,835
 109,207
Operating income273,736
 213,109
 125,022
437,808
 326,712
 244,794
Equity income (d)
2,367
 
 
Other income2,349
 1,242
 8,228
5,639
 2,349
 1,242
Interest expense (d)
30,856
 1,672
 2,944
Interest expense (e)
45,661
 30,856
 1,672
Income before income taxes245,229
 212,679
 130,306
400,153
 298,205
 244,364
Income tax expense12,456
 41,572
 36,065
6,703
 31,705
 54,573
Net income$232,773
 $171,107
 $94,241
$393,450
 $266,500
 $189,791
          
Calculation of limited partner interest in net income:   
  
   
  
Net income$232,773
 $171,107
 $94,241
$393,450
 $266,500
 $189,791
Less pre-acquisition income allocated to parent(20,151) (67,529) (57,682)(11,106) (53,878) (86,213)
Less general partner interest in net income(15,705) (2,927) (791)(54,447) (15,705) (2,927)
Limited partner interest in net income$196,917
 $100,651
 $35,768
$327,897
 $196,917
 $100,651
          
Net income per limited partner unit – basic$3.53
 $2.47
 $1.03
$4.71
 $3.53
 $2.47
Net income per limited partner unit – diluted$3.52
 $2.46
 $1.03
$4.70
 $3.52
 $2.46
          
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding – basic55,745
 40,739
 34,679
69,612
 55,745
 40,739
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding – diluted55,883
 40,847
 34,734
69,773
 55,883
 40,847

(a) Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of the Northern West Virginia Marcellus gathering system (NWV Gathering). Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of NWV Gathering and the Jupiter natural gas gathering system (Jupiter). Financial statements for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise Pipeline, LLC (Sunrise). See Note 2.
(b)Operating revenues included affiliate revenues from EQT Corporation and subsidiaries (collectively, EQT) of $245.1$447.6 million, $260.3$328.5 million and $169.3$310.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. In December 2013, EQT completed the sale of Equitable Gas Company, LLC (Equitable Gas Company) to PNG Companies LLC. As a result, revenues from Equitable Gas Company were reported as third party revenues starting in 2014. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013, and 2012, Equitable Gas Company revenues reported as affiliate revenues were $37.6 million and $36.8 million, respectively.million. See Note 4.5.
(c)Operating and maintenance expense included charges from EQT of $23.9$33.1 million, $18.2$28.7 million and $16.8$21.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expense included charges from EQT of $29.3$48.5 million, $24.8$40.7 million and $21.2$31.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. See Note 4.5.
(d)Equity income relates to EQM's interest in Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, which is a related party.
(e)
Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 included $23.2 million, $19.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively, related to interest on a capital lease with an affiliate (see Note 12). Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 included interest expense of $4.1 million to an affiliate on intercompany debt.affiliate. See Note 4.12.

 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.


6367

Table of Contents

EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS(a) 
 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2014 2013 20122015 2014 2013
(Thousands)(Thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:   
  
   
  
Net income$232,773
 $171,107
 $94,241
$393,450
 $266,500
 $189,791
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
  
   
  
Depreciation and amortization36,599
 25,924
 19,531
51,640
 46,054
 30,906
Deferred income taxes428
 6,339
 54,208
2,998
 19,528
 37,663
Equity income(2,367) 
 
Other income(2,349) (1,242) (8,228)(5,639) (2,349) (1,242)
Non-cash long term compensation expense3,368
 981
 2,282
1,467
 3,368
 981
Non-cash adjustments(1,520) (680) (2,508)
 (1,520) (680)
Changes in other assets and liabilities:   
  
   
  
Accounts receivable(8,029) (4,720) (10,825)(639) (8,029) (4,720)
Accounts payable3,680
 (5,076) (4,882)8,643
 4,713
 (4,534)
Due to/from EQT affiliates(19,097) 26,539
 34,619
2,913
 (38,892) 11,639
Other assets and other liabilities11,671
 1,388
 (5,391)11,010
 11,173
 496
Net cash provided by operating activities257,524
 220,560
 173,047
463,476
 300,546
 260,300
Cash flows from investing activities:   
  
   
  
Capital expenditures(203,915) (121,431) (214,880)(408,955) (318,105) (283,011)
Jupiter Acquisition - net assets from EQT(168,198) 
 
Acquisitions - net assets from EQT(386,791) (168,198) 
MVP Interest Acquisition and capital contributions, net of sales of interests in the MVP Joint Venture(74,658) 
 
Purchase of preferred interest in EQT Energy Supply, LLC(124,317) 
 
Net cash used in investing activities(372,113) (121,431) (214,880)(994,721) (486,303) (283,011)
Cash flows from financing activities:   
  
   
  
Proceeds from the issuance of common units, net of offering costs902,467
 529,442
 276,780
1,183,921
 902,467
 529,442
Jupiter Acquisition - purchase price in excess of net assets from EQT(952,802) 
 
Acquisitions - purchase price in excess of net assets from EQT(486,392) (952,802) 
Sunrise Merger payment(110,000) (507,500) 

 (110,000) (507,500)
Proceeds from short-term loans450,000
 
 
Payments of short-term loans(450,000) 
 
Proceeds from credit facility borrowings617,000
 450,000
 
Payments on credit facility borrowings(318,000) (450,000) 
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt500,000
 
 

 500,000
 
Distribution of proceeds from the issuance of common units
 
 (230,887)
Due to/from EQT
 
 (49,657)
Retirements of long-term debt
 
 (135,235)
Partners' investments and net change in parent advances13,905
 (60,814) 253,453
Net (distributions to) contributions from EQT(23,866) 85,073
 61,026
Capital contributions382
 5,631
 1,863
1,781
 382
 5,631
Distributions paid to unitholders(119,628) (66,176) (12,386)(212,262) (119,628) (66,176)
Pre-merger and predecessor distributions paid to EQT
 (31,390) (10,193)
Pre-merger distributions paid to EQT
 
 (31,390)
Discount, debt issuance costs and credit facility fees(9,707) 
 (1,864)
 (9,707) 
Capital lease principal payments(2,216) 
 
(6,298) (2,216) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities222,401
 (130,807) 91,874
755,884
 293,569
 (8,967)
          
Net change in cash and cash equivalents107,812
 (31,678) 50,041
224,639
 107,812
 (31,678)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year18,363
 50,041
 
126,175
 18,363
 50,041
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$126,175
 $18,363
 $50,041
$350,814
 $126,175
 $18,363
          
Cash paid during the year for:   
  
   
  
Interest paid$20,693
 $939
 $6,461
Interest, net of amount capitalized$45,477
 $20,693
 $939
Non-cash activity during the year:   
  
   
  
Elimination of net current and deferred tax liabilities$51,813
 $43,083
 $143,587
$84,446
 $51,813
 $43,083
Limited partner and general partner units issued for acquisitions59,000
 32,500
 
52,500
 59,000
 32,500
Capital lease asset/obligation9,161
 134,395
 
35,708
 9,161
 134,395
Contingent consideration
 110,000
 

 
 110,000
Non-cash distributions$
 $
 $12,229
Settlement of current income taxes payable/(receivable) with EQT$
 $(18,322) $2,841
(a) Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of NWV Gathering. Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of NWV Gathering and Jupiter. Financial statements for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise. See Note 2.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6468

Table of Contents

EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(a) 
 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2014 20132015 2014
(Thousands, except number of units)(Thousands, except number of units)
ASSETS   
   
Current assets:   
   
Cash and cash equivalents$126,175
 $18,363
$350,814
 $126,175
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $260 and $152 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively)16,492
 8,463
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $238 and $260 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively)17,131
 16,492
Accounts receivable – affiliate37,435
 23,620
77,925
 55,068
Other current assets870
 1,033
1,680
 1,710
Total current assets180,972
 51,479
447,550
 199,445
   
Property, plant and equipment1,423,490
 1,163,683
2,228,967
 1,821,803
Less: accumulated depreciation(200,529) (168,740)(258,974) (216,486)
Net property, plant and equipment1,222,961
 994,943
1,969,993
 1,605,317
Investments in unconsolidated entities201,342
 
Other assets18,057
 17,550
14,950
 18,057
Total assets$1,421,990
 $1,063,972
$2,633,835
 $1,822,819
      
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL   
   
Current liabilities:   
   
Accounts payable$36,973
 $8,634
$35,868
 $43,785
Due to related party33,013
 34,190
33,413
 33,342
Sunrise Merger consideration payable to EQT
 110,000
Credit facility borrowings299,000
 
Accrued interest8,338
 3
8,753
 8,338
Accrued liabilities9,055
 5,041
12,194
 9,055
Total current liabilities87,379
 157,868
389,228
 94,520
Deferred income taxes, net
 39,840
Deferred income taxes
 78,583
Long-term debt492,633
 
493,401
 492,633
Lease obligation143,828
 133,733
175,660
 143,828
Other long-term liabilities7,111
 6,014
7,834
 7,111
Total liabilities730,951
 337,455
1,066,123
 816,675
      
Partners’ capital:   
   
Predecessor equity
 82,329

 315,105
Common units (43,347,452 and 30,468,902 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively)1,647,910
 818,431
Subordinated units (17,339,718 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013)(929,374) (175,996)
General partner interest (1,238,514 and 975,686 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively)(27,497) 1,753
Common units (77,520,181 and 43,347,452 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively)1,598,675
 1,647,910
Subordinated units (17,339,718 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014)
 (929,374)
General partner interest (1,443,015 and 1,238,514 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively)(30,963) (27,497)
Total partners’ capital691,039
 726,517
1,567,712
 1,006,144
Total liabilities and partners’ capital$1,421,990
 $1,063,972
$2,633,835
 $1,822,819
  (a) Financial statements as of December 31, 20132014 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of Jupiter.NWV Gathering. See Note 2.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


6569

Table of Contents

EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013(a) 
  Partners’ Capital    Partners’ Capital  
Predecessor Limited Partners General  Predecessor Limited Partners General  
Equity Common Subordinated Partner TotalEquity Common Subordinated Partner Total
(Thousands)(Thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2012$247,507
 $
 $
 $
 $247,507
Balance at January 1, 2013$364,743
 $313,304
 $153,664
 $8,108
 $839,819
Net income57,682
 16,345
 19,423
 791
 94,241
86,213
 58,673
 41,978
 2,927
 189,791
Investment by partners and net change in parent advances253,453
 
 
 
 253,453
Distributions paid(10,193) 
 
 
 (10,193)
Non-cash distributions(12,229) 
 
 
 (12,229)
Elimination of net current and deferred tax liabilities143,587
 
 
 
 143,587
Contribution of net assets to EQT Midstream Partners, LP(400,231) 56,470
 330,279
 13,482
 
Issuance of common units to public, net of offering costs
 276,780
 
 
 276,780
Distribution of proceeds
 (32,837) (192,049) (6,001) (230,887)
Capital contribution
 2,080
 2,080
 84
 4,244
Equity-based compensation plans
 535
 
 
 535
Distributions to unitholders
 (6,069) (6,069) (248) (12,386)
Balance at December 31, 2012$279,576
 $313,304
 $153,664
 $8,108
 $754,652
         
Net income67,529
 58,673
 41,978
 2,927
 171,107
Investment by partners and net change in parent advances(60,814) 
 
 
 (60,814)
Capital contribution
 1,705
 1,363
 64
 3,132
Net contributions from EQT63,867
 
 
 
 63,867
Capital contributions
 1,705
 1,363
 64
 3,132
Equity-based compensation plans
 981
 
 
 981

 981
 
 
 981
Distributions to unitholders
 (37,774) (26,877) (1,525) (66,176)
 (37,774) (26,877) (1,525) (66,176)
Pre-merger distributions to EQT(31,390) 
 
 
 (31,390)(31,390) 
 
 
 (31,390)
Proceeds from equity offering, net of offering costs
 529,442
 
 
 529,442
Proceeds from issuance of common units, net of offering costs
 529,442
 
 
 529,442
Elimination of net current and deferred tax liabilities43,083
 
 
 
 43,083
43,083
 
 
 
 43,083
Sunrise net assets from EQT(215,655) 
 
 
 (215,655)(215,655) 
 
 
 (215,655)
Issuance of units
 20,845
 
 11,655
 32,500

 20,845
 
 11,655
 32,500
Purchase price in excess of net assets from EQT
 (68,745) (346,124) (19,476) (434,345)
��(68,745) (346,124) (19,476) (434,345)
Balance at December 31, 2013$82,329
 $818,431
 $(175,996) $1,753
 $726,517
$310,861
 $818,431
 $(175,996) $1,753
 $955,049
                  
Net income20,151
 136,992
 59,925
 15,705
 232,773
53,878
 136,992
 59,925
 15,705
 266,500
Capital contribution
 338
 152
 10
 500
Capital contributions
 338
 152
 10
 500
Equity-based compensation plans
 3,692
 
 
 3,692

 3,692
 
 
 3,692
Investment by partners and net change in parent advances
13,905
 
 
 
 13,905
Net contributions from EQT66,751
 
 
 
 66,751
Distributions to unitholders
 (75,328) (35,026) (9,274) (119,628)
 (75,328) (35,026) (9,274) (119,628)
Proceeds from equity offering, net of offering costs
 902,467
 
 
 902,467
Proceeds from issuance of common units, net of offering costs
 902,467
 
 
 902,467
Elimination of net current and deferred tax liabilities51,813
 
 
 
 51,813
51,813
 
 
 
 51,813
Jupiter net assets from EQT(168,198) 
 
 
 (168,198)(168,198) 
 
 
 (168,198)
Issuance of units
 39,091
 
 19,909
 59,000

 39,091
 
 19,909
 59,000
Purchase price in excess of net assets from EQT
 (177,773) (778,429) (55,600) (1,011,802)
 (177,773) (778,429) (55,600) (1,011,802)
Balance at December 31, 2014$
 $1,647,910
 $(929,374) $(27,497) $691,039
$315,105
 $1,647,910
 $(929,374) $(27,497) $1,006,144
         
Net income11,106
 327,897
 
 54,447
 393,450
Capital contributions
 7,342
 
 150
 7,492
Equity-based compensation plans
 1,537
 
 33
 1,570
Net distributions to EQT(23,866) 
 
 
 (23,866)
Distributions to unitholders
 (162,040) (10,057) (40,165) (212,262)
Conversion of subordinated units to common units(b)

 (939,431) 939,431
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of common units, net of offering costs
 1,182,002
 
 1,919
 1,183,921
Elimination of net current and deferred tax liabilities84,446
 
 
 
 84,446
NWV Gathering net assets from EQT(386,791) 
 
 
 (386,791)
Issuance of units
 38,910
 
 13,590
 52,500
Purchase price in excess of net assets from EQT
 (505,452) 
 (33,440) (538,892)
Balance at December 31, 2015$
 $1,598,675
 $
 $(30,963) $1,567,712
(a) Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of NWV Gathering. Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of NWV Gathering and Jupiter. Financial statements for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 have been retrospectively recast to reflect the inclusion of NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise. See Note 2.
(b) All subordinated units were converted to common units on a one-for-one basis on February 17, 2015. For purposes of calculating net income per common and subordinated unit, the conversion of the subordinated units was deemed to have occurred on January 1, 2015. See Note 8.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6670

Table of Contents

EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 20142015
 
1.             Summary of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies
 
Organization and Basis of Presentation
 
EQT Midstream Partners, LP (EQT Midstream Partners or the Partnership), which closed its initial public offering (IPO) on July 2, 2012,(EQM) is a growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership formed by EQT Corporation in January 2012. Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) is a Pennsylvania limited partnership and the predecessor for accounting purposes (the Predecessor) of EQT Midstream Partners. EQT Midstream Services, LLC (EQM General Partner), a direct wholly owned subsidiary of EQT GP Holdings, LP (EQGP), is the Partnership’s general partner. References in these consolidated financial statements to the Partnership, when used for periods prior to the IPO, refer to Equitrans.  References in these consolidated financial statements to the Partnership, when used for periods beginning at or following the IPO, refer collectively to the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries.partner of EQM. References in these consolidated financial statements to EQT refer collectively to EQT Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Immediately prior to the closing of the IPO, EQT contributed all of the partnership interests in Equitrans to the Partnership. Therefore, the historical financial statements contained in this report reflect the assets, liabilities and results of operations of Equitrans presented on a carve-out basis for periods before July 2, 2012 and EQT Midstream Partners for periods beginning at or following July 2, 2012. Additionally, asAs discussed in Note 2, the Partnership’sEQM’s consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively recast for all periods presented to include the historical results of NWV Gathering, which was acquired by EQM on March 17, 2015, Jupiter, which was acquired by EQM on May 7, 2014, and Sunrise, which was merged into the PartnershipEQM on July 22, 2013, and Jupiter, which was acquired on May 7, 2014, because boththese transactions were between entities under common control.
 
The PartnershipEQM does not have any employees. Operational support for the PartnershipEQM is provided by EQT Gathering, LLC (EQT Gathering), one of EQT’s operating subsidiaries engaged in midstream business operations. EQT Gathering’s employees manage and conduct the Partnership’sEQM’s daily business operations.
 
Nature of Business
 
The PartnershipEQM is a growth-oriented limited partnership formed by EQT to own, operate, acquire and develop midstream assets in the Appalachian Basin. The PartnershipEQM provides midstream services to EQT and third parties in the Appalachian Basin across 2122 counties in Pennsylvania and West Virginia through two primary assets: the transmission and storage system and the gathering system.
 
Transmission and Storage System: The Partnership’sAs of December 31, 2015, EQM’s transmission and storage system includesincluded an approximately 700 mile700-mile Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)-regulated interstate pipeline that connects to five interstate pipelines and multiple distribution companies. The transmission system is supported by 14 associated natural gas storage reservoirs with approximately 400 MMcf per day of peak withdrawal capabilitycapacity and 32 Bcf of working gas capacity and 27 compressor units. As of December 31, 2014,2015, the transmission assets had total throughput capacity of approximately 3.03.1 Bcf per day. The PartnershipEQM also operates the Allegheny Valley Connector (AVC) facilities as described in Note 12. Revenues are primarily driven by the Partnership’sgenerated from EQM’s firm and interruptible transmission and storage contracts.
 
Gathering System: The Partnership’sAs of December 31, 2015, EQM’s gathering system includesincluded approximately 45185 miles of high-pressurehigh pressure gathering lines primarily associated with the Jupiter gathering system. Jupiter includes three compressor stations with approximately 575 MMcf1.4 Bcf per day of total compressionfirm gathering capacity as of December 31, 2014. Jupiter has access to sixand multiple interconnect points with the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage system. The Partnership’sEQM’s gathering system also includes approximately 1,500 miles of FERC-regulated low-pressurelow pressure gathering lines. Revenues associated with the Partnership’s gathering system are primarily generated underfrom EQM's firm and interruptible gathering service contracts.

Limited Partner and General Partner Units
The following table summarizes common, subordinated and general partner units issued from the date of the Partnership’s IPO through December 31, 2014.

67

Table of Contents

  Limited Partner Units General  
  Common Subordinated Partner Units Total
Issued in connection with IPO 17,339,718
 17,339,718
 707,744
 35,387,180
Balance at December 31, 2012 17,339,718
 17,339,718
 707,744
 35,387,180
July 2013 equity offering 12,650,000
 
 
 12,650,000
Sunrise Merger consideration 479,184
 
 267,942
 747,126
Balance at December 31, 2013 30,468,902
 17,339,718
 975,686
 48,784,306
May 2014 equity offering 12,362,500
 
 
 12,362,500
Jupiter Acquisition consideration 516,050
 
 262,828
 778,878
Balance at December 31, 2014 43,347,452
 17,339,718
 1,238,514
 61,925,684
Immediately prior to the closing of the IPO, EQT contributed all of the partnership interests in Equitrans to the Partnership. The Partnership issued 14,375,000 common units to the public in the IPO and received net proceeds of approximately $277 million, after deducting the underwriters' discount and offering expenses. At the time of the IPO, EQT retained 2,964,718 common units, 17,339,718 subordinated units and 707,744 general partner units.

In July 2013, the Partnership completed an underwritten public offering of 12,650,000 common units. The Partnership received net proceeds of approximately $529 million from this offering after deducting the underwriters’ discount and offering expenses of approximately $21 million. Net proceeds from the offering were used to fund the cash consideration paid to EQT in connection with the Sunrise Merger discussed in Note 2.

In May 2014, the Partnership completed an underwritten public offering of 12,362,500 common units. The Partnership received net proceeds of approximately $902 million from this offering after deducting the underwriters’ discount and offering expenses of approximately $34 million. Net proceeds from the offering were used to finance the cash consideration paid to EQT in connection with the Jupiter Acquisition discussed in Note 2.

As of December 31, 2014, EQT owned a 36.4% equity interest in the Partnership, which included 3,959,952 common units, 17,339,718 subordinated units and 1,238,514 general partner units. EQT also holds the incentive distribution rights as discussed in Note 10.

Significant Accounting Policies
 
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EQT Midstream Partners and all entities in which EQM holds a controlling financial interest. EQM applies the equity method of its subsidiaries and partnerships.accounting where it can exert significant influence over, but does not control or direct the policies, decisions or activities of an entity. EQM applies the cost method of accounting where it is unable to exert significant influence over the entity.

The consolidated financial statements reflect the historical results of businesses acquired through common control transactions, as reflected on a combined basis with EQM's historical financial statements. See Note 2. Transactions between the PartnershipEQM and EQT have been identified in the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements as transactions between related parties and are discussed in Note 4.5.
 
Segments: Operating segments are revenue-producing components of the enterprise for which separate financial information is produced internally and are subject to evaluation by the Partnership’sEQM’s chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources. The PartnershipEQM reports its operations in two segments, which reflect its lines of business.  Transmission and storage includes the Partnership’sEQM’s FERC-regulated interstate pipeline and storage business. Gathering primarily includes the Jupiter natural gashigh pressure gathering systemlines and the FERC-regulated low pressure gathering system. The operating segments are evaluated on their contribution to the Partnership’s

71

Table of Contents

EQM’s operating income. All of the Partnership’sEQM’s operating revenues, income from continuing operations and assets are generated or located in the United States. See Note 3.4.
 
Reclassification: Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Certain prior year amounts in the statements of consolidated cash flows have been revised to correctly present changes in accrued liabilities related to the timing of payments for capital expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2013, net cash provided by operating activities increased by approximately $13.2 million with a corresponding increase in net cash used in investing activities as a result of this correction. For the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities decreased by approximately $8.4 million with a corresponding decrease in net cash used in investing activities as a result of this correction. There was no impact to the statements of consolidated operations or consolidated balance sheets.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

68

Table of Contents


Cash and Cash Equivalents:  The PartnershipEQM considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.  Interest earned on cash equivalents is included as a reduction to interest expense in the accompanying statements of consolidated operations.

Trade and Other Receivables:  Trade and other receivables are stated at their historical carrying amount. Judgment is required to assess the ultimate realization of accounts receivable, including assessing the probability of collection and the creditworthiness of customers. Based upon management’s assessments, allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately $0.3$0.2 million and $0.2$0.3 million were provided at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and 2013, respectively. The PartnershipEQM also has receivables due from EQT as discussed in Note 4.5.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The PartnershipEQM has categorized its assets and liabilities recordeddisclosed at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts due to/from related parties and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short maturity of the instruments; these are considered Level 1 fair values. The carrying value of short-term loans under the Partnership'sEQM's credit facility borrowings approximates fair value as the interest rates are based on prevailing market rates; this is considered a Level 1 fair value. As the Partnership’sEQM’s long-term debt is not actively traded, the fair value of the debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement which is estimated using a standard industry income approach model which utilizes a discount rate based on market rates for debt with similar remaining time to maturity and credit risk. See Note 9. The fair value of the Preferred Interest (as defined in Note 2) is a Level 3 fair value which is estimated using an income approach model utilizing a market-based discount rate and EQM's internally developed long-term assumptions for the underlying entity growth. See Note 6.

Property, Plant and Equipment: The Partnership’sEQM’s property, plant and equipment are stated at depreciated cost. Maintenance projects that do not increase the overall life of the related assets are expensed as incurred. Expenditures that extend the useful life of the underlying asset are capitalized. EQM capitalized internal costs of $64.9 million in 2015. EQM capitalized $3.1 million and $1.2 million of interest on unregulated assets under construction in 2015 and 2014, respectively.
 As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2014 2013 2015 2014
 (Thousands) (Thousands)
Transmission and storage assets $1,045,207
 $904,699
 $1,247,970
 $1,045,207
Accumulated depreciation (159,583) (135,949) (181,672) (159,583)
Net transmission and storage assets 885,624
 768,750
 1,066,298
 885,624
Gathering assets 378,283
 258,984
 980,997
 776,596
Accumulated depreciation (40,946) (32,791) (77,302) (56,903)
Net gathering assets 337,337
 226,193
 903,695
 719,693
Net property, plant and equipment $1,222,961
 $994,943
 $1,969,993
 $1,605,317
 
Depreciation is recorded using composite rates on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. The overall raterates of depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013 were approximately 2.6%2.3%, 2.3%2.5% and 2.1%, respectively. The PartnershipEQM estimates the pipelines have useful lives ranging from 25 years to 65 years and the compression equipment has useful lives ranging from 25 years to 4550 years. As circumstances warrant, depreciation estimates are reviewed to determine if any changes in the underlying assumptions are necessary. For the Partnership'sEQM's regulated fixed assets, depreciation rates are re-evaluated each time the Partnershipit files with the FERC for a change in its transportationtransmission and storage rates.
 

72

Table of Contents

Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of long-lived assets may not be recoverable, the PartnershipEQM reviews its long-lived assets for impairment by first comparing the carrying value of the assets to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. The transmission, storage and gathering systems are evaluated as one asset group for impairment purposes because the cash flows are not independent of one another. If the carrying value exceeds the sum of the assets’ undiscounted cash flows, the PartnershipEQM estimates an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and fair value of the assets.
 
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities: EQM evaluates its investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced a decline in value. When there is evidence of loss in value that is other than temporary, EQM compares the estimated fair value of the investment to the carrying value of the investment to determine whether impairment has occurred. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.

Unamortized Debt Discount and Issuance Expense: Discounts and expenses incurred with the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the debt. These amounts are presented as a reduction of long-term debt on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Expenses incurred with the issuance and extension of the credit facility are presented in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Natural Gas Imbalances: The PartnershipEQM experiences natural gas imbalances when the actual amount of natural gas delivered from a pipeline system or storage facility differs from the amount of natural gas scheduled to be delivered. The

69

Table of Contents

PartnershipEQM values these imbalances due to or from shippers and operators at current index prices. Imbalances are settled in-kind, subject to the terms of the FERC tariff. Imbalances as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 were $2.0$0.6 million and $1.1$2.0 million, respectively, and are included in other current assets and accrued liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets with offsetting amounts recorded to system gas, a component of property, plant and equipment. The PartnershipEQM classifies the imbalance liabilitiesimbalances as current as it expects to settle them within a year.

Asset Retirement Obligations: The Partnership operates and maintains itsEQM's transmission and storage system and its gathering system and intends to do so as long as supply and demandhave indeterminate lives because they will operate for natural gas exists, which is expectedan indeterminate period when properly maintained. Any retirement obligations associated with such assets cannot be estimated. A liability for the foreseeable future. Therefore, the Partnership believes that it cannot reasonably estimate the asset retirement obligations for its system assets as these assets have indeterminate lives.will be recorded only if and when a future retirement obligation with a determinable life exists and can be estimated.

Contingencies: The PartnershipEQM is involved in various regulatory and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. A liability is recorded for contingencies based upon the Partnership'sEQM's assessment that a loss is probable and that the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The PartnershipEQM considers many factors in making these assessments, including history and specifics of each matter. Estimates are developed in consultation with legal counsel and are based upon the analysis of potential results.

Regulatory Accounting: The Partnership’sEQM’s regulated operations consist of interstate pipeline, intrastate gathering and storage operations subject to regulation by the FERC. Rate regulation provided by the FERC is designed to enable the PartnershipEQM to recover the costs of providing the regulated services plus an allowed return on invested capital. The application of regulatory accounting allows the PartnershipEQM to defer expenses and income in its consolidated balance sheets as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that those expenses and income will be allowed in the rate setting process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in the statements of consolidated operations for a non-regulated entity. The deferred regulatory assets and liabilities are then recognized in the statements of consolidated operations in the period in which the same amounts are reflected in rates. The amounts deferred in the consolidated balance sheets relate primarily to the accounting for income taxes, post-retirement benefit costs, base storage gas and the storage retainage tracker on the AVC system. The amounts established for accounting for income taxes were primarily generated during the pre-IPO period prior to EQM's change in tax status in July 2012 when the PartnershipEQM was included as part of EQT’s consolidated federal tax return. The PartnershipEQM believes that it will continue to be subject to rate regulation that will provide for the recovery of deferred costs. See Note 13.
 
Revenue Recognition: Revenues relating to the transmission, storage and gathering of natural gas are recognized in the period service is provided. Reservation revenues on firm contracted capacity are recognized ratably over the contract period based on the contracted volume regardless of the amount of natural gas that is transported.transported or gathered. Revenues associated with transported or gathered volumes under firm and interruptible servicescontracts are recognized as physical deliveries of natural gas are made.
 
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC): The PartnershipEQM capitalizes the carrying costs for the construction of certain regulated long-term assets and amortizes the costs over the life of the related assets. The calculated AFUDC includes capitalization of the cost of financing construction of assets subject to regulation by the FERC (the interest component). AFUDC also includes a designated cost of equity for financing the construction of these regulated assets (the equity component). AFUDC applicable toThe interest costcomponents of AFUDC for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and 2012 were $0.7$1.4 million, $0.4

73

Table of Contents

$0.7 million and $1.9$0.4 million, respectively, and were included as a reduction of interest expense in the statements of consolidated operations. AFUDC applicable toThe equity fundscomponents of AFUDC for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and 2012 were $5.6 million, $2.2 million $1.2 million and $6.7$1.2 million, respectively, and were recorded in other income in the statements of consolidated operations.
 
Equity-Based Compensation: The PartnershipEQM has awarded equity-based compensation in connection with the EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. These awards will be paid in EQM common units; therefore, the PartnershipEQM treats these programs as equity awards. These awards haveAwards that contain a market condition relatedrequire EQM to total unitholder return; therefore the expense associated with theseobtain a valuation while other awards is based onare recorded at the fair value as determined by a Monte Carlo analysis.which utilizes the published market price on the grant date and an estimated payout multiple based on expected performance on plan metrics. Significant assumptions made in the Monte Carlo analysis includedvaluing certain of EQM’s awards include the market price of units at payout date, total unitholder return threshold to be achieved, volatility, risk-free rate, term, dividend yield and forfeiture rate. See Note 10.

Net Income per Limited Partner Unit: Net income per limited partner unit is calculated utilizing the two-class method by dividing the limited partner interest in net income by the weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period. The Partnership’sEQM’s net income is allocated to the general partner and limited partners including the subordinated unitholder, in accordance with their respective ownership percentages, and when applicable, giving effect to incentive distributions allocable to the general partner. The allocation of undistributed earnings, or net income in excess of distributions, to the incentive distribution rights is limited to available cash (as defined by the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement) for the period. The Partnership’sEQM’s net income allocable to the limited partners is allocated between common and

70

Table of Contents

subordinated unitholders, as applicable, by applying the provisions of the Partnership’sits partnership agreement that govern actual cash distributions as if all earnings for the period had been distributed. Any common units issued during the period are included on a monthly weighted-average basis for the periods in which they were outstanding. Diluted net income per limited partner unit reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or agreements to issue common units, such as awards under the long-term incentive plan, were exercised, settled or converted into EQM common units. When it is determined that potential common units resulting from an award subject to performance or market conditions should be included in the diluted net income per limited partner unit calculation, the impact is reflected by applying the treasury stock method. Net income attributable to NWV Gathering for the periods prior to March 17, 2015, to Jupiter for the periods prior to May 7, 2014 and to Sunrise for the periodperiods prior to July 22, 2013 and to Jupiter for the period prior to May 7, 2014 was not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per limited partner unit as these were pre-acquisition amounts and such earnings were not available to pay the unitholders. See Note 10.8.
 
Income Taxes: For federal and state income tax purposes, all income, expenses, gains, losses and tax credits generated flow through to the owners, and accordingly, do not result in a provision for income taxes for the Partnership.EQM. Net income for financial statement purposes may differ significantly from taxable income of unitholders because of differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and the taxable income allocation requirements under the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement.  The aggregate difference in the basis of the Partnership’sEQM’s net assets for financial and tax reporting purposes cannot be readily determined because information regarding each partner’s tax attributes is not available to us. See Note 5 for further discussion of income taxes included in the consolidated financial statements.11.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards:
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Internationalissued Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued a converged standard on revenue recognition to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). To meet those objectives, the FASB is amending the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and creating a new Topic 606, Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.Customers. The standard requires an entity to recognize revenue standardin a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition requirements in GAAP when it becomes effective and is effectiverequired to be adopted using one of two retrospective application methods. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date which approved a one year deferral of ASU 2014-09 for fiscal yearsannual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Partnership2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is permitted as of the original effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. EQM is currently evaluating the method of adoption and impact this standard will have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation. The standard changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The ASU will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods therein. EQM has evaluated this standard and determined the adoption of it will have no significant impact on reported results or disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest. The standard requires an entity to present the debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt

74

Table of Contents

liability, consistent with debt discounts. EQM has early adopted this standard which had no significant impact on reported results or disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. The ASU adds guidance that will help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement. EQM has early adopted this standard which had no significant impact on reported results or disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-06, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260): Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions. The ASU applies to master limited partnerships that receive net assets through a dropdown transaction. EQM has early adopted this standard which had no impact on reported results or disclosures.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. This ASU clarified that theSEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. EQM has early adopted this standard which had no significant impact on reported results or disclosures.

Subsequent Events: The PartnershipEQM has evaluated subsequent events through the date of the financial statement issuance.

2.                         Jupiter AcquisitionAcquisitions and Sunrise Merger

On April 30, 2014,The following table presents EQM's acquisitions and merger transactions completed during the Partnership, its general partner, EQM Gathering Opco, LLC (EQM Gathering), athree years ended December 31, 2015.
  Acquisition Date Total Consideration Cash Common Units Issued to EQT GP Units Issued to EQT
  (Thousands, except unit amounts)
Sunrise Merger (a)
 7/22/13 $650,000
 $617,500
 479,184
 267,942
Jupiter Acquisition (b)
 5/7/14 1,180,000
 1,121,000
 516,050
 262,828
NWV Gathering Acquisition (c)
 3/17/15 925,683
 873,183
 511,973
 178,816
MVP Interest Acquisition (d)
 3/30/15 54,229
 54,229
 
 
Preferred Interest Acquisition (e)
 4/15/15 $124,317
 $124,317
 
 

(a) Sunrise, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership,EQT, merged with and into Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQM. Upon closing, EQM paid EQT Gathering entered into a contribution agreement (Contribution Agreement) pursuant to which, on May 7, 2014, EQT Gathering contributed to$507.5 million in cash and issued EQM Gathering certain assets constituting the Jupiter natural gas gathering system (Jupiter Acquisition). The aggregate consideration paid by the Partnership to EQT in connection with the Jupiter Acquisition was approximately $1,180 million, consisting of a $1,121 million cash payment and issuance of 516,050 common units and 262,828EQM general partner units of the Partnership.to EQT. The cash portion of the purchase price was funded with the net proceeds from an equity offering of EQM common units and borrowings under the Partnership’s credit facility.

On July 15, 2013, the Partnership and Equitrans entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with EQT and Sunrise, a wholly owned subsidiary of EQT and the owner of the Sunrise Pipeline. Effective July 22, 2013,     Sunrise merged with and into Equitrans, with Equitrans continuing as the surviving company (Sunrise Merger).  Upon closing, the Partnership paid EQT consideration of $540 million, consisting of a $507.5 million cash payment, 479,184 Partnership common units and 267,942 Partnership general partner units. Prior to the Sunrise Merger, Equitrans entered into a precedent agreement with a third party for firm transportation service on the Sunrise Pipeline over a twenty-year term (the Precedent Agreement).  Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, followingterm. Following the effectiveness of the transportation agreement contemplated by the Precedent Agreementprecedent agreement in December 2013, the PartnershipEQM was obligated to pay additional cash consideration of $110 million to EQT in January 2014. 2014 which was funded by borrowings under EQM's credit facility.

(b) EQT contributed Jupiter to EQM Gathering Opco, LLC (EQM Gathering), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQM. The cash portion of the purchase price was funded with the net proceeds from an equity offering of EQM common units and borrowings under EQM’s credit facility.

(c) EQT contributed NWV Gathering to EQM Gathering. The cash portion of the purchase price was funded with net proceeds from an equity offering of EQM common units and borrowings under EQM's credit facility.

(d) EQM assumed 100% of the membership interests in MVP Holdco, LLC (MVP Holdco), the owner of the interest (the MVP Interest) in Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (MVP Joint Venture), which at the time was an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT. The cash payment made represented EQM's reimbursement to EQT for 100% of the capital contributions made by EQT to the MVP Joint Venture as of March 30, 2015. The cash payment was funded by borrowings under EQM's credit facility. See Note 6.

75

Table of Contents


(e) Pursuant to the NWV Gathering Acquisition contribution and sale agreement, EQM acquired a preferred interest (the Preferred Interest) from EQT in EQT Energy Supply, LLC (EES), which at the time was an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT. EES generates revenue from services provided to a local distribution company. The cash payment was funded by borrowings under EQM's credit facility. See Note 6.

NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise were businesses and the NWV Gathering Acquisition, Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise Merger were transactions between entities under common control; therefore, the PartnershipEQM recorded the assets and liabilities of NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise at their carrying amounts to EQT on the date of the respective transactions. The difference between EQT’s net carrying amount and the total consideration paid to EQT was recorded as a capital transaction with EQT, which resulted in a reduction in partners’ capital. This portion of the consideration was recorded in financing activities in the statements of consolidated cash flows. The PartnershipEQM recast its consolidated financial statements to retrospectively reflect the NWV Gathering Acquisition, Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise Merger as if the assets and liabilitiesentities were owned for all periods presented; however, the consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred if the PartnershipEQM had owned the assetsthem during the periods reported.

71

Table of Contents


Prior to the Sunrise Merger, the PartnershipEQM operated the Sunrise Pipeline as part of its transmission and storage system under a lease agreement with EQT. The lease was a capital lease under GAAP; therefore, revenues and expenses associated with Sunrise were included in the Partnership’sEQM’s historical consolidated financial statements and the Sunrise Pipeline was depreciated over the lease term of 15 years. Effective as of the closing of the Sunrise Merger on July 22, 2013, the lease agreement was terminated. As a result, the recast of the consolidated financial statements for the Sunrise Merger included recasting depreciation expense recognized for the periods prior to the merger to reflect the pipeline’s useful life of 40 years. The decrease in depreciation expense and interest expense associated with the capital lease increased previously reported net income for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the first six months of 2013. In addition, because the effect of the recast of the financial statements resulted in the elimination of the capital lease obligation from the PartnershipEQM to Sunrise, which was essentially equal to the carrying value of the net assets acquired with the Sunrise Merger, this portion of the consideration paid was recorded in financing activities in the statements of consolidated cash flows.

3.                         Financial Information by Business SegmentPartners' Capital
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Thousands)
Revenues from external customers (including affiliates):   
  
Transmission and storage$254,820
 $173,881
 $120,797
Gathering138,139
 129,831
 79,208
Total$392,959
 $303,712
 $200,005
Operating income:   
  
Transmission and storage$183,294
 $124,950
 $81,127
Gathering90,442
 88,159
 43,895
Total operating income$273,736
 $213,109
 $125,022
      
Reconciliation of operating income to net income:     
Other income2,349
 1,242
 8,228
Interest expense30,856
 1,672
 2,944
Income tax expense12,456
 41,572
 36,065
Net income$232,773
 $171,107
 $94,241

The following table summarizes EQM's public offerings of its common units during the three years ended December 31, 2015.
 As of December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Thousands)
Segment assets:   
  
Transmission and storage$928,864
 $807,287
 $619,163
Gathering364,261
 238,322
 207,406
Total operating segments1,293,125
 1,045,609
 826,569
Headquarters, including cash128,865
 18,363
 50,041
Total assets$1,421,990
 $1,063,972
 $876,610
  
Common Units Issued (a)
 
GP Units Issued (b)
 Price Per Unit Net Proceeds Underwriters' Discount and Other Offering Expenses
  (Thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
July 2013 equity offering (c)
 12,650,000
 
 $43.50
 $529,442
 $20,833
May 2014 equity offering (d)
 12,362,500
 
 75.75
 902,467
 33,992
March 2015 equity offering (e)
 9,487,500
 25,255
 76.00
 696,582
 24,468
$750 million At the Market (ATM) Program (f)
 1,162,475
 
 74.92
 85,483
 1,610
November 2015 equity offering (g)
 5,650,000
 
 $71.80
 $399,937
 $5,733

(a) Includes the issuance of additional common units pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment options, as applicable.

(b) Represents general partner units issued to the EQM General Partner in exchange for its proportionate capital contribution. See Note 2 for a summary of general partner units issued in conjunction with acquisitions.

(c) The net proceeds were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration paid to EQT in connection with the Sunrise Merger as described in Note 2.

(d) The net proceeds were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration paid to EQT in connection with the Jupiter Acquisition as described in Note 2.

(e) The underwriters' exercised their option to purchase additional common units subsequent to the completion of the original offering; therefore, the EQM General Partner purchased 25,255 EQM general partner units for approximately

7276

Table of Contents

$1.9 million to maintain its then 2.0% general partner ownership percentage, which was included in net proceeds from this offering. The net proceeds were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration paid to EQT in connection with the NWV Gathering Acquisition as described in Note 2.

(f) During the third quarter of 2015, EQM entered into an equity distribution agreement that established an ATM common unit offering program, pursuant to which a group of managers, acting as EQM's sales agents, may sell EQM common units having an aggregate offering price of up to $750 million (the $750 million ATM Program). The price per unit represents an average price for all issuances under the $750 million ATM Program in 2015. The underwriters' discount and offering expenses in the table above include commissions of approximately $0.9 million. EQM used the net proceeds for general partnership purposes.

Prior to this $750 million ATM Program, the EQM General Partner maintained its general partner ownership percentage at the previous level of 2.0%. Starting with this $750 million ATM Program, the EQM General Partner elected not to maintain its general partner ownership percentage.

(g) EQM plans to use the net proceeds for general partnership purposes, including to fund a portion of EQM's anticipated transmission and gathering expansion in 2016 and to repay amounts outstanding under EQM's credit facility.

The following table summarizes EQM's common, subordinated and general partner units issued and outstanding from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Thousands)
Depreciation and amortization:   
  
Transmission and storage$26,792
 $18,323
 $12,901
Gathering9,807
 7,601
 6,630
Total$36,599
 $25,924
 $19,531
Expenditures for segment assets:   
  
Transmission and storage$127,134
 $77,989
 $188,143
Gathering118,014
 30,254
 35,118
Total (a)
$245,148
 $108,243
 $223,261
  Limited Partner Units General  
  Common Subordinated Partner Units Total
Balance at January 1, 2013 17,339,718
 17,339,718
 707,744
 35,387,180
July 2013 equity offering 12,650,000
 
 
 12,650,000
Sunrise Merger consideration 479,184
 
 267,942
 747,126
Balance at December 31, 2013 30,468,902
 17,339,718
 975,686
 48,784,306
May 2014 equity offering 12,362,500
 
 
 12,362,500
Jupiter Acquisition consideration 516,050
 
 262,828
 778,878
Balance at December 31, 2014 43,347,452
 17,339,718
 1,238,514
 61,925,684
Conversion of subordinated units to common units 17,339,718
 (17,339,718) 
 
2014 EQM VDA issuance 21,063
 
 430
 21,493
March 2015 equity offering 9,487,500
 
 25,255
 9,512,755
NWV Gathering Acquisition consideration 511,973
 
 178,816
 690,789
$750 million ATM Program 1,162,475
 
 
 1,162,475
November 2015 equity offering 5,650,000
 
 
 5,650,000
Balance at December 31, 2015 77,520,181
 
 1,443,015
 78,963,196

See Note 8 for discussion of the conversion of the subordinated units in February 2015. In February 2015, EQM issued 21,063 common units under the 2014 EQM Value Driver Award (2014 EQM VDA) as discussed in Note 10. In connection with this issuance, the EQM General Partner purchased 430 EQM general partner units to maintain its then 2.0% general partner ownership percentage.

As of December 31, 2015, EQGP and its subsidiaries owned 21,811,643 EQM common units, representing a 27.6% limited partner interest, 1,443,015 EQM general partner units, representing a 1.8% general partner interest, and all of the incentive distribution rights in EQM. As of December 31, 2015, EQT owned 100% of the non-economic general partner interest and a 90.1% limited partner interest in EQGP.

77

Table of Contents


4.Financial Information by Business Segment
 Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
 (Thousands)
Revenues from external customers (including affiliates):   
  
Transmission and storage$296,895
 $254,820
 $173,881
Gathering317,239
 221,727
 180,120
Total$614,134
 $476,547
 $354,001
Operating income:   
  
Transmission and storage$203,159
 $183,294
 $124,950
Gathering234,649
 143,418
 119,844
Total operating income$437,808
 $326,712
 $244,794
      
Reconciliation of operating income to net income:     
Equity income2,367
 
 
Other income5,639
 2,349
 1,242
Interest expense45,661
 30,856
 1,672
Income tax expense6,703
 31,705
 54,573
Net income$393,450
 $266,500
 $189,791

 As of December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
 (Thousands)
Segment assets:   
  
Transmission and storage$1,110,027
 $928,864
 $807,287
Gathering963,877
 765,090
 526,290
Total operating segments2,073,904
 1,693,954
 1,333,577
Headquarters, including cash559,931
 128,865
 18,363
Total assets$2,633,835
 $1,822,819
 $1,351,940
 Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
 (Thousands)
Depreciation and amortization:   
  
Transmission and storage$29,497
 $26,792
 $18,323
Gathering22,143
 19,262
 12,583
Total$51,640
 $46,054
 $30,906
Expenditures for segment assets:   
  
Transmission and storage$168,873
 $127,134
 $77,989
Gathering207,342
 226,168
 197,543
Total (a)
$376,215
 $353,302
 $275,532
 
(a) The PartnershipEQM accrues capital expenditures when work has been completed but the associated bills have not yet been paid. These accrued amounts are excluded from capital expenditures on the consolidated statements of consolidated cash flows until they are paid in a subsequent period. Accrued capital expenditures in the table above were $46.1approximately $18.3 million, $5.2$51.1 million and $18.4$16.3 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. Additionally, the PartnershipEQM capitalizes certain labor overhead costs which include a portion of non-cash equity-based compensation. These non-cash capital expenditures in the table above

78

Table of Contents

were less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.3 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2014.2015 and 2014, respectively. There were no amounts capitalized for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.2013.

4.         Related-Party5.         Related Party Transactions
 
Affiliate transactions. In the ordinary course of business, the PartnershipEQM has transactions with affiliated companies. The Partnership has various contracts withEQT and its affiliates including, but not limited to, transportation service and precedent agreements, storage agreements and gas gathering agreements.
 
Operation and Management Services AgreementThe PartnershipEQM has an operation and management services agreement with EQT Gathering, pursuant to which EQT Gathering provides the Partnership’sEQM’s pipelines and storage facilities with certain operational and management services. The PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT Gathering for such services pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement described below.

The Partnership EQM is allocated the portion of operating and maintenance expense and selling, general and administrative expense incurred by EQT and EQT Gathering which is related to the Partnership.EQM.

Employees of EQT operate the Partnership’sEQM’s assets. EQT charges the PartnershipEQM for the payroll and benefit costs associated with these individuals and for retirees of Equitrans. EQT carries the obligations for pension and other employee-related benefits in its consolidated financial statements. The PartnershipEQM is allocated a portion of EQT’s defined benefit pension plan and retiree medical and life insurance plan cost for the retirees of Equitrans. The Partnership’sEQM’s share of those costs is recorded in due to related parties and reflected in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of consolidated operations. See Note 9.

The historical financial statements of the Predecessor, and Jupiter and Sunrise as applicable, included long-term incentive compensation plan expense associated with the EQT long-term incentive plan which is not an expense of the Partnership subsequent to the IPO under the omnibus agreement. At the time of the IPO, the Partnership’s general partner established its own long-term incentive compensation plan as discussed in Note 11.14.

Omnibus AgreementThe PartnershipEQM entered into an omnibus agreement by and among EQM, the Partnership, its general partnerEQM General Partner and EQT. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, EQT agreed to provide the PartnershipEQM with a license to use the name “EQT” and related marks in connection with the Partnership’sEQM’s business. The omnibus agreement also provides for certain indemnification and reimbursement obligations between EQT and EQM. Effective January 1, 2015, EQM amended its omnibus agreement with EQT to provide for the Partnership.reimbursement by EQM of direct and indirect costs and expenses attributable to EQT's long-term incentive programs as these plans will be utilized to compensate and retain EQT employees who provide services to EQM. For the period subsequent to EQM's initial public offering (IPO) and prior to the January 1, 2015 amendment, the expense associated with the EQT long-term incentive plan was not an expense of EQM under the omnibus agreement because, at the time of EQM's IPO, the EQM General Partner established its own long-term incentive plan as discussed in Note 10. The historical financial statements of NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise prior to acquisition also included long-term incentive compensation plan expense associated with the EQT long-term incentive plan. The following table summarizes the reimbursement amounts.reimbursed amounts for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

73

Table of Contents

Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2014 2013 
2012 (a)
2015 2014 2013
(Thousands)(Thousands)
Reimbursements to EQT   
  
   
  
Operating and maintenance expense (b)(a)
$21,999
 $14,296
 $8,534
$31,310
 $21,999
 $14,296
Selling, general and administrative expense (b)(a)
$25,051
 $18,322
 $7,728
$46,149
 $25,051
 $18,322
          
Reimbursements from EQT(b)   
  
   
  
Plugging and abandonment (c)
$500
 $566
 $1,585
$26
 $500
 $566
Bare steel replacement (c)

 2,566
 2,659
6,268
 
 2,566
Big Sandy Pipeline claims$
 $
 $2,700
Other capital reimbursements$1,198
 $
 $

(a) Post-IPO period only as the omnibus agreement did not exist prior to the IPO.
(b) The expenses for which the PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT and its subsidiaries may not necessarily reflect the actual expenses that the PartnershipEQM would incur on a stand-alone basis and the PartnershipEQM is unable to estimate what those expenses would be on a stand-alone basis. These amounts exclude the recast impact of the NWV Gathering Acquisition, Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise Merger as these amounts do not represent reimbursements pursuant to the omnibus agreement.
(c) The(b) These reimbursements for plugging and abandonment and bare steel replacement were recorded as capital contributions from EQT.

79

Table of Contents

Summary of affiliaterelated party transactions. The following table summarizes affiliaterelated party transactions:
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122015 2014 2013
(Thousands)(Thousands)
Operating revenues (a)
$245,101
 $260,258
 $169,275
$447,587
 $328,527
 $310,245
Operating and maintenance expense (b)
23,945
 18,249
 16,776
33,091
 28,688
 21,931
Selling, general and administrative expense (b)
29,348
 24,815
 21,202
48,545
 40,663
 31,263
Equity income2,367
 
 
Interest expense$19,888
 $843
 $4,110
23,225
 19,888
 843
Distributions to the EQM General Partner (c)
109,194
 59,537
 36,647
Capital contributions from EQT$7,492
 $500
 $3,132

(a) In December 2013, EQT completed the sale of Equitable Gas Company to PNG Companies LLC. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013, and 2012, Equitable Gas Company revenues reported as affiliate revenues were $37.6 million and $36.8 million, respectively.million.

(b) The expenses for which the PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT and its subsidiaries may not necessarily reflect the actual expenses that the PartnershipEQM would incur on a stand-alone basis and the PartnershipEQM is unable to estimate what those expenses would be on a stand-alone basis. These amounts include the recast impact of the NWV Gathering Acquisition, Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise Merger as it representsthey represent the total amounts allocated to the PartnershipEQM by EQT for the periods presented.

(c) The distributions to the EQM General Partner are based on the period to which the distributions relate and not the period in which the distributions were declared and paid. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2015, total distributions to the EQM General Partner included the cash distribution declared on January 21, 2016 to EQM's unitholders related to the fourth quarter of 2015 of $0.71 per common unit.

The following table summarizes affiliaterelated party balances:
 As of December 31,
 2014 2013
 (Thousands)
Accounts receivable - affiliate$37,435
 $23,620
Due to related parties33,013
 34,190
Sunrise Merger consideration due to EQT (Note 2)
 110,000
Capital lease obligation, including current portion$147,588
 $135,238
 As of December 31,
 2015 2014
 (Thousands)
Accounts receivable – affiliate$77,925
 $55,068
Due to related party33,413
 33,342
Investments in unconsolidated entities201,342
 
Capital lease obligation, including current portion$181,156
 $147,588

As discussed inSee also Note 2, Note 3, Note 6, Note 7, priorNote 10, Note 12 and Note 14 for further discussion of related party transactions.

6.         Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

MVP Joint Venture

On March 30, 2015, EQM assumed EQT's interest in MVP Holdco, which owns the interest in the MVP Joint Venture, for $54.2 million. The MVP Joint Venture plans to construct the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP), an estimated 300-mile natural gas interstate pipeline spanning from northern West Virginia to southern Virginia. EQM also assumed the role of operator of the MVP from EQT. In April and October 2015, EQM sold 10% and 1% ownership interests in the MVP Joint Venture, respectively. The purchase from EQT and subsequent sales of interests in the MVP Joint Venture were all for consideration that was equal to the Partnership’s IPO, EQT provided financing to its subsidiaries predominantly through intercompany demand and term notes.  Priorproportional amount of capital contributions made to the IPO, Equitrans had demandjoint venture as of the date of the respective transactions and term notes due to EQTresulted in no gains or losses. As of approximately $135.2 million which were repaidDecember 31, 2015, EQM owned a 54% interest in June 2012. Interest expense on affiliate long-term debt and demand loansthe MVP Joint Venture.


7480

Table of Contents

amounted to $4.1 millionThe following table presents EQM's interest in the MVP Joint Venture for the year ended December 31, 2012. In addition, prior2015.
  MVP Joint Venture
  (Thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2014 $
Initial investment 54,229
Equity income (a)
 2,367
Capital contributions 30,151
Sales of interests in the MVP Joint Venture (9,722)
Balance at December 31, 2015 $77,025

(a) Equity income relates to EQM's interest in the MVP Joint Venture and represents EQM's portion of the MVP Joint Venture's AFUDC on construction of the MVP.

The MVP Joint Venture has been determined to be a variable interest entity because the MVP Joint Venture has insufficient equity to finance activities during the construction stage of the project. EQM is not the primary beneficiary because it does not have the power to direct the activities of the MVP Joint Venture that most significantly impact its economic performance. Certain business decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions about operating and construction budgets, project construction schedule, material contracts or precedent agreements, indebtedness, significant acquisitions or dispositions, material regulatory filings and strategic decisions require the approval of owners holding more than a 66 2/3% interest in the joint venture and no one member owns more than a 66 2/3% interest. Beginning on the date it was assumed from EQT, EQM accounted for the MVP Interest as an equity method investment as EQM has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the MVP Joint Venture. EQM records adjustments to the IPO, EQT made advancesinvestment balance for contributions to Equitransor distributions from the MVP Joint Venture and its pro-rata share of earnings of the MVP Joint Venture, which is referred to as equity income on the statements of consolidated operations.

On January 21, 2016, an affiliate of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ConEd) acquired a 12.5% interest in the MVP Joint Venture (ConEd Transaction), 8.5% of which was purchased from EQM. EQM received cash payments of $12.5 million which was equal to EQM's proportional capital contributions to the MVP Joint Venture through the date of the transaction. As of February 11, 2016, EQM owned a 45.5% interest in the MVP Joint Venture. ConEd has the right to terminate its purchase of the interest in the MVP Joint Venture and be reimbursed for changesthe purchase price and all capital contributions it makes to the MVP Joint Venture for a period ending no later than December 31, 2016.

As of December 31, 2015, EQM had issued a $108 million performance guarantee in working capital, cash usedfavor of the MVP Joint Venture as performance assurances for capital expenditures, and other cash flow needs which were viewed as financing transactions as Equitrans would have otherwise obtained demand or term notes from EQTMVP Holdco's obligations to fund them.
5.         Income Taxes
The Partnership’s financial statementsits proportionate share of the construction budget for the period prior to the IPO include U.S. federal and state income tax as its income was included as part of EQT’s consolidated federal tax return.  In conjunction with the contribution by EQT of the ownership of Equitrans to the Partnership immediately prior to the IPO, approximately $143.6 million of net current and deferred income tax liabilities were eliminated through equity. Effective July 2, 2012, asMVP. As a result of its limited partnership structure, the Partnership is no longer subjectConEd Transaction, the amount of the performance guarantee decreased to federal$91 million in January 2016. Upon the FERC’s initial release to begin construction of the MVP, EQM's guarantee will terminate and state income taxes. For federal and state income tax purposes, all income, expenses, gains, losses and tax credits generated flow throughEQM will be obligated to issue a new guarantee in an amount equal to 33% of MVP Holdco’s remaining obligations to make capital contributions to the owners, and accordingly, do not resultMVP Joint Venture in a provision for income taxes for the Partnership.
As discussed in Note 2, the Partnership completed the Jupiter Acquisition on May 7, 2014 and the Sunrise Merger on July 22, 2013. These were transactions between entities under common control and as a result the Partnership recast its consolidated financial statements to retrospectively reflect the operations of Jupiter and Sunrise. Prior to these transactions, the income of Jupiter and Sunrise was included as part of EQT’s consolidated federal tax return; therefore, the Jupiter and Sunrise operations were subject to income taxes.  Accordingly, the income tax effects associatedconnection with the operationsthen remaining construction budget, less any credit assurances issued by any affiliate of Jupiter and Sunrise prior toEQM under such affiliate's precedent agreement with the Jupiter Acquisition and the Sunrise Merger are reflected in the consolidatedMVP Joint Venture.

EQM's maximum financial statements. Due to the changes in tax status of Jupiter and Sunrise, approximately $51.8 million and $43.1 million, respectively, of net current and deferred income tax liabilities were eliminated through equity during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The components of the federal income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are as follows: 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Thousands)
Current:   
  
Federal$10,608
 $31,610
 $(22,263)
State1,420
 3,623
 4,211
Subtotal12,028
 35,233
 (18,052)
Deferred:   
  
Federal316
 4,761
 51,128
State112
 1,578
 3,080
Subtotal428
 6,339
 54,208
Amortization of deferred investment tax credit
 
 (91)
Total$12,456
 $41,572
 $36,065
Prior to the Jupiter Acquisition, the Sunrise Merger, and the IPO, tax obligations were the responsibility of EQT. EQT’s consolidated federal income tax was allocated among the group’s members on a separate return basis with tax credits allocated to the members generating the credits. The current federal tax benefit recorded in 2012 relates to cash refunds received during the year from EQT for its use of Sunrise’s tax bonus depreciation deductions. The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (2010 Tax Relief Act) increased bonus depreciation from 50% to 100% for qualified investments made after September 8, 2010 and before January 1, 2012. Certain investmentsstatement exposure related to the Sunrise Pipeline qualified for this bonus depreciation. The Sunrise Pipeline leaseMVP Joint Venture was treatedapproximately $185 million, which includes the investment balance of $77 million on the consolidated balance sheet as an operating lease for income tax purposes; therefore, EQT was able to elect bonus depreciation forof December 31, 2015 and amounts which could have become due under the Sunrise Pipeline, which was included in its consolidated federal tax return.performance guarantee as of that date.

Income tax expense differedPreferred Interest

In the second quarter of 2015, EQM acquired a preferred interest in EES from amounts computedEQT. EES was determined to be a variable interest entity because it has insufficient equity to finance its activities. EQM is not the primary beneficiary because it does not have the power to direct the activities of EES that most significantly impact its economic performance. The Preferred Interest was determined to be a cost method investment as EQM does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of EES and was recorded at historical cost. Dividends received from EES will be recorded as income. No dividends were received in 2015.

As of December 31, 2015, the federal statutory ratecarrying value and the fair value of 35% on pre-tax book income from continuing operationsthe Preferred Interest were $124 million and $140 million, respectively. The carrying value represents EQM's maximum exposure to loss as follows:of December 31, 2015. The fair value was measured using Level 3 inputs as described in Note 1.

7581

Table of Contents


 Years Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Thousands)
Tax at statutory rate$85,830
 $74,438
 $45,607
Partnership income not subject to income taxes(74,426) (36,253) (12,623)
State income taxes1,051
 3,380
 3,491
Unrecognized tax benefits
 
 1,248
Regulatory assets
 3
 (1,491)
Other1
 4
 (167)
Income tax expense$12,456
 $41,572
 $36,065
      
Effective tax rate5.1% 19.5% 27.7%
7.Cash Distributions
 
The decrease in income tax expense from 2013EQM partnership agreement requires EQM to 2014 resulted fromdistribute all of its available cash to EQM unitholders within 45 days after the change inend of each quarter. Available cash generally means, for any quarter, all cash and cash equivalents on hand at the tax statusend of Jupiter in 2014. The increase in income tax expense from 2012that quarter:
less, the amount of cash reserves established by the EQM General Partner to:
provide for the proper conduct of EQM’s business (including reserves for future capital expenditures, anticipated future debt service requirements and refunds of collected rates reasonably likely to 2013 resulted from increased operating income related to Jupiter, partly offset by decreasesbe refunded as a result of a settlement or hearing related to FERC rate proceedings or rate proceedings under applicable law subsequent to that quarter);
comply with applicable law, any of EQM’s debt instruments or other agreements; or
provide funds for distributions to EQM’s unitholders and to the changes in the tax statusEQM General Partner for any one or more of the Partnership in 2012next four quarters (provided that the EQM General Partner may not establish cash reserves for distributions if the effect of the establishment of such reserves will prevent EQM from distributing the minimum quarterly distribution on all common units and any cumulative arrearages on such common units for the current quarter);
plus, if the EQM General Partner so determines, all or any portion of Sunrise in 2013.the cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of such quarter.

All incentive distribution rights are held by the EQM General Partner. Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an increasing percentage (13.0%, 23.0% and 48.0%) of quarterly distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels described below have been achieved. The Partnership’s historical uncertain tax positions were immaterial and were attributableEQM General Partner may transfer the incentive distribution rights separately from its general partner interest, subject to Jupiter for periods prior to the Jupiter Acquisition, attributable to Sunrise for periods prior to the Sunrise Merger or attributable to periods prior to the IPO, as applicable. Additionally, EQT has indemnified the Partnership for these historical tax positions; therefore, the Partnership does not anticipate any future liabilities arising from these uncertain tax positions.restrictions in EQM’s partnership agreement.
 
The following table summarizesdiscussion assumes that the sourceEQM General Partner continues to own both its 1.8% general partner interest and tax effectsthe incentive distribution rights.
If for any quarter:
•      EQM has distributed available cash from operating surplus to the common unitholders in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution; and
•      EQM has distributed available cash from operating surplus on outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of temporary differences between financial reportingthe minimum quarterly distribution;
then, EQM will distribute any additional available cash from operating surplus for that quarter among the unitholders and tax basis of assets and liabilities: the EQM General Partner in the following manner:
 December 31,
 2013
 (Thousands)
Deferred income taxes: 
Total deferred income tax assets$(496)
Total deferred income tax liabilities39,840
Total net deferred income tax liabilities$39,344
  
Total deferred income tax (assets)/liabilities: 
PP&E tax deductions in excess of book deductions$39,840
Other (reported as other current assets)(496)
Total net deferred income tax liabilities$39,344
  Total Quarterly
Distribution per
 
Marginal Percentage Interest in
Distributions
  Unit Target Amount Unitholders General Partner
Minimum Quarterly Distribution $0.35 98.2% 1.8%
First Target Distribution Above $0.3500 up to $0.4025 98.2% 1.8%
Second Target Distribution Above $0.4025 up to $0.4375 85.2% 14.8%
Third Target Distribution Above $0.4375 up to $0.5250 75.2% 24.8%
Thereafter Above $0.5250 50.2% 49.8%
 
At December 31, 2013, there was no valuation allowance relatingTo the extent these incentive distributions are made to deferred tax assets as the entire balance was expectedEQM General Partner, more available cash proportionally is allocated to be realized. The deferred tax liabilities principally consistedthe EQM General Partner than to holders of temporary differences between financial and tax reporting for the Partnership’s property, plant and equipment (PP&E) for Jupiter and Sunrise assets prior to their ownership by the Partnership. The deferred tax assets and liabilities were eliminated in connection with the Jupiter Acquisition and the Sunrise Merger.limited partner units.

EQT has indemnified the Partnership from and against any losses suffered or incurred by the Partnership and related to or arising out of or in connection with any federal, state or local income tax liabilities attributable to the ownership or operation of the Partnership’s assets prior to the acquisition of such assets from EQT. Therefore, the Partnership does not anticipate any future liabilities arising from the historical deferred tax liabilities.

6.         Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are recoverable or reimbursable over various periods and do not earn a return on investment. The Partnership believes that it will continue to be subject to rate regulation that will provide for the recovery or reimbursement of its regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities.  Regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are included in other assets and other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

7682

Table of Contents

On January 21, 2016, the Board of Directors of the EQM General Partner declared a cash distribution to EQM's unitholders for the fourth quarter of 2015 of $0.71 per common unit. Cash distributions to EQGP were approximately $15.5 million related to its limited partner interest, $1.3 million related to its general partner interest and $16.2 million related to its incentive distribution rights. The cash distributions will be paid on February 12, 2016 to unitholders of record at the close of business on February 1, 2016.

8.         Net Income per Limited Partner Unit
 
The Partnership hastable below presents EQM’s calculation of net income per limited partner unit for common and subordinated limited partner units. Net income attributable to NWV Gathering for periods prior to March 17, 2015, to Jupiter for periods prior to May 7, 2014 and to Sunrise for periods prior to July 22, 2013 were not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per limited partner unit. 

The phantom units granted to the independent directors of the EQM General Partner will be paid in common units upon a regulatory asset associated with deferred taxesdirector’s termination of $13.4 millionservice on the EQM General Partner's Board of Directors. As there are no remaining service, performance or market conditions related to these awards, 14,017 and $14.1 million11,418 phantom unit awards were included in the calculation of basic weighted average limited partner units outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Potentially dilutive securities included in the calculation of diluted weighted average limited partner units outstanding totaled 160,633, 137,800 and 108,113 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Conversion of subordinated units. Upon payment of the cash distribution for the fourth quarter of 2014, the financial requirements for the conversion of all subordinated units were satisfied. As a result, on February 17, 2015, the 17,339,718 subordinated units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis. For purposes of calculating net income per common and subordinated unit, the conversion of the subordinated units is deemed to have occurred on January 1, 2015. The conversion did not impact the amount of the cash distribution paid or the total number of EQM’s outstanding units representing limited partner interests.

83

Table of Contents

  Years Ended December 31,
  2015 2014 2013
  (Thousands, except per unit data)
Net income $393,450
 $266,500
 $189,791
Less:      
Pre-acquisition net income allocated to parent (11,106) (53,878) (86,213)
General partner interest in net income – general partner units (7,455) (4,252) (2,140)
General partner interest in net income – incentive distribution rights (46,992) (11,453) (787)
Limited partner interest in net income $327,897
 $196,917
 $100,651
       
Net income allocable to common units - basic $327,897
 $136,992
 $58,673
Net income allocable to subordinated units - basic 
 59,925
 41,978
Limited partner interest in net income - basic $327,897
 $196,917
 $100,651
       
Net income allocable to common units - diluted $327,897
 $137,048
 $58,697
Net income allocable to subordinated units - diluted 
 59,869
 41,954
Limited partner interest in net income - diluted $327,897
 $196,917
 $100,651
       
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding – basic      
Common units 69,612
 38,405
 23,399
Subordinated units 
 17,340
 17,340
Total 69,612
 55,745
 40,739
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding – diluted      
Common units 69,773
 38,543
 23,507
Subordinated units 
 17,340
 17,340
Total 69,773
 55,883
 40,847
Net income per limited partner unit – basic      
Common units $4.71
 $3.57
 $2.51
Subordinated units 
 3.46
 2.42
Total $4.71
 $3.53
 $2.47
Net income per limited partner unit - diluted      
Common units $4.70
 $3.56
 $2.50
Subordinated units 
 3.45
 2.42
Total $4.70
 $3.52
 $2.46
9.         Debt
The following table presents EQM's outstanding debt as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013, respectively, primarily related to deferred income taxes recoverable through future rates on a historical deferred tax position and2014.
  December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
  Principal Carrying Value 
Fair
Value
(a)
 Principal Carrying Value 
Fair
Value
(a)
  (Thousands)
EQM Credit Facility $299,000
 $299,000
 $299,000
 $
 $
 $
4.00% Senior Notes due 2024 $500,000
 $493,401
 $414,125
 $500,000
 $492,633
 $495,685

(a) Fair value is measured using Level 1 inputs for the equity component of AFUDC. The Partnership expects to recover the amortization of the deferred tax position ratably over the corresponding life of the underlying assets that created the difference. Taxes on the equity component of AFUDC and the offsetting deferred income taxes will be collected through rates over the depreciable lives of the long-lived assets to which they relate. The amounts established for deferred taxes were primarily generated during the pre-IPO period when the Partnership was included as part of EQT’s consolidated federal tax return. Effective July 2, 2012, the Partnership is a partnership for income tax purposes and no longer subject to federal and state income taxes.
The Partnership defers expenses for on-going post-retirement benefits other than pensions which are subject to recovery in approved rates.  The regulatory liability as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 of $4.5 million and $3.7 million, respectively, reflects lower cumulative actuarial expenses than the amounts recovered through rates, which could be subject to reimbursement to customers in the next rate case.
Regulatory assets associated with other recoverable costs were $1.7 million and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and primarily related to the recovery of storage base gas. Regulatory liabilities associated with other reimbursable costs was $2.1 million as of December 31, 2014 and primarily related to the storage retainage tracker on the AVC system. The Partnership defers the monthly over or under recovery of storage retainage gas on the AVC system and annually returns the excess to or recovers the deficiency from customers.
7.         Debt
In February 2014, the Partnership amended its credit facility to increaseborrowings and Level 2 inputs for the borrowing capacity tolong-term debt as described in Note 1.

Credit Facility. EQM has a $750 million. The amendedmillion credit facility will expirethat expires in February 2019. The credit facility is available to fund working capital requirements and capital expenditures, to purchase assets, to pay distributions, to repurchase units and for general partnership purposes. Subject to certain terms and conditions, the credit facility has an accordion feature that allows the Partnership

84

Table of Contents

EQM to increase the available borrowings under the facility by up to an additional $250 million. In addition, the credit facility includes a sublimit up to $75 million for same-day swing line advances and a sublimit up to $150 million for letters of credit. Further, the PartnershipEQM has the ability to request that one or more lenders make term loans to it under the credit facility subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, which term loans will be secured by cash and qualifying investment grade securities. The Partnership’sEQM’s obligations under the revolving portion of the credit facility are unsecured. The Partnership’s obligations under the credit facility were unconditionally guaranteed by each of the Partnership’s subsidiaries. In January 2015, the Partnership amended its credit facility to, among other things, release its subsidiaries from their guarantee obligations under the credit facility. See Note 17.

During the third quarter of 2014, the Partnership issued 4.00% Senior Notes due August 1, 2024 in the aggregate principal amount of $500 million (the 4.00% Senior Notes). Net proceeds from the offering of $492.3 million, inclusive of a discount of $2.9 million2015 and debt issuance costs of $4.8 million, were used to repay the outstanding borrowings under the Partnership’s credit facility and for general partnership purposes. The 4.00% Senior Notes contain covenants that limit the Partnership’s ability to, among other things, incur certain liens securing indebtedness, engage in certain sale and leaseback transactions, and enter into certain consolidations, mergers, conveyances, transfers or leases of all or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets. At December 31, 2014, the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs were $2.8 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

The payment obligations under the 4.00% Senior Notes were unconditionally guaranteed by each of the Partnership’s subsidiaries that guaranteed the Partnership’s credit facility (other than EQT Midstream Finance Corporation), which entities are referred to as "the Senior Note Guarantors." In connection with the release of the subsidiary guarantors from their guarantees under the credit facility, the Senior Note Guarantors were released from their guarantees of the 4.00% Senior Notes.

As of December 31, 2014, there were no amounts outstanding under the credit facility. During 2014, the maximum amount of EQM's outstanding short-term loanscredit facility borrowings at any time was $404 million and $450 million, respectively, the average daily balance of short-term loanscredit facility borrowings outstanding was approximately $261 million and $119 million, respectively, and interest was incurred on the loanscredit facility borrowings at a weighted average annual interest rate of 1.67%. The Partnership1.7% for both periods. EQM did not have any short-term loanscredit facility borrowings outstanding at any time during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.2013. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, commitment fees of $1.2 million, $1.4 million $0.9 million and $0.4$0.9 million, respectively, were paid to maintain credit availability under the Partnership'sEQM's credit facility. See Note 18 for EQM's repayment of the credit facility borrowings in February 2016.

The Partnership’sEQM’s credit facility contains various provisions that, if not complied with, could result in termination of the credit facility, require early payment of amounts outstanding or similar actions. The most significant covenants and events of default under the credit facility relate to maintenance of permitted leverage ratio, limitations on transactions with affiliates,

77

Table of Contents

limitations on restricted payments, insolvency events, nonpayment of scheduled principal or interest payments, acceleration of other financial obligations and change of control provisions. Under the credit facility, the PartnershipEQM is required to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of not more than 5.00 to 1.00 (or, not more than 5.50 to 1.00 for certain measurement periods following the consummation of certain acquisitions). As of December 31, 2014, the Partnership2015, EQM was in compliance with all credit facility provisions and covenants.
Prior to the IPO, EQT provided financing to the Partnership generally through intercompany term and demand loans. On June 21, 2012, the term note of $135.2 million was retired.

8.         Fair Value Measurements

The carrying valueSenior Notes. During the third quarter of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts2014, EQM issued 4.00% Senior Notes due to/August 1, 2024 in the aggregate principal amount of $500 million (the 4.00% Senior Notes). Net proceeds from related parties and accounts payable approximate fair value duethe offering were used to repay the short maturity of the instruments. The carrying value of short-term loansoutstanding borrowings under the Partnership'sEQM’s credit facility approximates fair value as the interest rates are based on prevailing market rates. As of December 31, 2014, the estimated fair value of long-term debt was approximately $496 million.

9.         Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Employees of EQT operate the Partnership’s assets. EQT charges the Partnership for the payroll and benefit costs associated with these individualsat that time and for retirees of Equitrans. EQT carries the obligations for pension and other employee-related benefits in its financial statements.
Equitrans’ retirees participate in a defined benefit pension plangeneral partnership purposes. The 4.00% Senior Notes contain covenants that is sponsored by EQT. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Partnership reimbursed EQT approximately $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in order to meet certain funding targets. The Partnership expects to make cash payments to EQT of approximately $0.3 million in 2015 to reimburse for defined benefit pension plan funding. Historically, pension plan contributions have been designed to meet minimum funding requirements and keep plan assets at least equal to 80% of projected liabilities. The Partnership’s reimbursements to EQT are based on the proportion of the plan’s total liabilities allocable to Equitrans retirees. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Partnership was allocated $0.5 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of the expenses associated with the plan. The dollar amount of a cash reimbursement to EQT in any particular year will vary as a result of gains or losses sustained by the pension plan assets during the year due to market conditions. The Partnership does not expect the variability of contribution requirements to have a significant effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity orlimit EQM’s ability to, make distributions.
EQT, as the sponsor of the defined pension plan, terminated the plan effective December 31, 2014. Following satisfaction of applicable regulatory requirements, which is expected to occur by the end of 2016, EQT will fully fund the defined benefit pension plan by purchasing one or more annuities for participants from an insurance company oramong other financial institution. The Partnership will reimburse EQT for its proportionate share of such funding which is not expected to significantly impact its financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.

The Partnership contributes to a defined contribution plan sponsored by EQT. The contribution amount is a percentage of allocated base salary. In 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Partnership was charged its contribution percentage through the EQT payroll and benefit costs discussed in Note 4.
The individuals who operate the Partnership’s assets and Equitrans retirees participatethings, incur certain liens securing indebtedness, engage in certain other post-employment benefit plans sponsored by EQT. The Partnership was allocated $0.1 million, $0.2 millionsale and $0.3 million in 2014, 2013leaseback transactions, and 2012, respectively,enter into certain consolidations, mergers, conveyances, transfers or leases of the expenses associated with these plans.
The Partnership recognizes expenses for ongoing post-retirement benefits other than pensions, which are subject to recovery in the approved rates. Expenses recognized by the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for ongoing post-retirement benefits other than pensions were approximately $1.2 million per year.all or substantially all of EQM’s assets.
 
10.         Net Income per Limited Partner Unit and Cash Distributions
The following table presents the Partnership’s calculation of net income per limited partner unit for common and subordinated limited partner units. Net income attributable to periods prior to the IPO, to Sunrise for periods prior to July 22, 2013 and to Jupiter for periods prior to May 7, 2014 are not allocated to the limited partners for purposes of calculating net income per limited partner unit. 


78

Table of Contents

The phantom units granted to the independent directors of the Board of Directors of the Partnership’s general partner will be paid in common units on a director’s termination of service from the Board of Directors. As there are no remaining service, performance or market conditions related to these awards, 11,418 phantom unit awards were included in the calculation of basic weighted average limited partner units outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2014. Potentially dilutive securities included in the calculation of diluted weighted average limited partner units outstanding totaled 137,800, 108,113 and 54,938 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
  Years Ended December 31,
  2014 2013 2012
  (Thousands, except per unit data)
Net income $232,773
 $171,107
 $94,241
Less:    
  
Pre-acquisition net income allocated to parent (20,151) (67,529) (57,682)
General partner interest in net income – 2% (4,252) (2,140) (791)
General partner interest in net income attributable to incentive distribution rights (11,453) (787) 
Limited partner interest in net income $196,917
 $100,651
 $35,768
       
Net income allocable to common units - basic $136,992
 $58,673
 $16,345
Net income allocable to subordinated units - basic 59,925
 41,978
 19,423
Limited partner interest in net income - basic $196,917
 $100,651
 $35,768
       
Net income allocable to common units - diluted $137,048
 $58,697
 $16,370
Net income allocable to subordinated units - diluted 59,869
 41,954
 19,398
Limited partner interest in net income - diluted $196,917
 $100,651
 $35,768
       
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding – basic    
  
Common units 38,405
 23,399
 17,339
Subordinated units 17,340
 17,340
 17,340
Total 55,745
 40,739
 34,679
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding – diluted    
  
Common units 38,543
 23,507
 17,394
Subordinated units 17,340
 17,340
 17,340
Total 55,883
 40,847
 34,734
Net income per limited partner unit – basic    
  
Common units $3.57
 $2.51
 $0.94
Subordinated units 3.46
 2.42
 1.12
Total $3.53
 $2.47
 $1.03
Net income per limited partner unit - diluted      
Common units $3.56
 $2.50
 $0.94
Subordinated units 3.45
 2.42
 1.12
Total $3.52
 $2.46
 $1.03
The partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2012, the Partnership distribute all of its available cash (described below) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date.
Available cash
Available cash generally means, for any quarter, all cash and cash equivalents on hand at the end of that quarter:
less, the amount of cash reserves established by the Partnership’s general partner to:
provide for the proper conduct of the Partnership’s business (including reserves for future capital expenditures, anticipated future debt service requirements and refunds of collected rates reasonably

79

Table of Contents

likely to be refunded as a result of a settlement or hearing related to FERC rate proceedings or rate proceedings under applicable law subsequent to that quarter);
comply with applicable law, any of the Partnership’s debt instruments or other agreements; or
provide funds for distributions to the Partnership’s unit holders and to the Partnership’s general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters (provided that the Partnership’s general partner may not establish cash reserves for distributions if the effect of the establishment of such reserves will prevent the Partnership from distributing the minimum quarterly distribution on all common units and any cumulative arrearages on such common units for the current quarter);
plus, if the Partnership’s general partner so determines, all or any portion of the cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of such quarter.
Subordinated Units
All subordinated units are held by EQT. The Partnership’s partnership agreement provides that, during the period of time referred to as the “subordination period,” the common units will have the right to receive distributions of available cash from operating surplus each quarter in an amount equal to $0.35 per common unit (the minimum quarterly distribution, as defined in the Partnership’s partnership agreement) plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units from prior quarters, before any distributions of available cash from operating surplus may be made on the subordinated units. The practical effect of the subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that during the subordination period there will be available cash to distribute the minimum quarterly distribution to the common units. The subordination period will end and the subordinated units will convert to common units on a one-for-one basis when certain distribution requirements, as defined in the Partnership’s partnership agreement, have been met. See Note 17.
Incentive Distribution Rights
All incentive distribution rights are held by the Partnership’s general partner. Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an increasing percentage (13.0%, 23.0% and 48.0%) of quarterly distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels described below have been achieved. The Partnership’s general partner may transfer the incentive distribution rights separately from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in the Partnership’s partnership agreement.
The following discussion assumes that the Partnership’s general partner continues to own both its 2.0% general partner interest and the incentive distribution rights.
If for any quarter:
the Partnership has distributed available cash from operating surplus to the common and subordinated unitholders in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution; and
the Partnership has distributed available cash from operating surplus on outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution;
then, the Partnership will distribute any additional available cash from operating surplus for that quarter among the unitholders and the Partnership’s general partner in the following manner:
  
Total Quarterly
Distribution per
 
Marginal Percentage Interest in
Distributions
  Unit Target Amount Unitholders General Partner
Minimum Quarterly Distribution $0.35 98.0% 2.0%
First Target Distribution Above $0.3500 up to $0.4025 98.0% 2.0%
Second Target Distribution Above $0.4025 up to $0.4375 85.0% 15.0%
Third Target Distribution Above $0.4375 up to $0.5250 75.0% 25.0%
Thereafter Above $0.5250 50.0% 50.0%
To the extent these incentive distributions are made to the general partner, more available cash proportionally is allocated to the general partner than to holders of common and subordinated units.

80

Table of Contents

11.      Equity-Based Compensation Plan
 
Equity-based compensation expense recorded by the PartnershipEQM was $1.5 million, $3.4 million $1.0 million and $0.5$1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively.
 
At the closing of the IPO inIn July 2012, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner granted awards representing 146,490 common units (EQM Total Return Program). These awards havehad a market condition related to the total unitholder return realized on the Partnership’sEQM’s common units from the IPOgrant date through December 31, 2015. If earned, theThe units are expected to be distributed in PartnershipEQM common units. The PartnershipEQM accounted for these awards as equity awards using the $20.02 grant date fair value as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation as the valuation model. The price was generated using annual historical volatility of peer-group companies for the expected term of the awards, which is based upon the performance period.  The range of expected volatilities calculated by the valuation model was 27% -to 72% and the weighted-average expected volatility was 38%.  Additional assumptions included the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the awards based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant and an expected distribution growth rate of 10%. As of December 31, 2013, 142,500 of these2014, 139,980 performance awards were outstanding. Adjusting for 2,5202,350 forfeitures, there were 139,980137,630 performance awards were outstanding as of December 31, 2014.  As of December 31, 2014, there was $0.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the EQM Total Return Program which is2015. These awards are expected to be recognized by December 31, 2015.distributed during the first quarter of 2016.

In the first quarter of 2014, performance units were granted to EQT employees who provide services to the PartnershipEQM under the 2014 EQM Value Driver Award (2014 EQM VDA).  The 2014 EQM VDA was established to align the interests of key EQT employees with the interests of unitholders and customers and the strategic objectives of the Partnership.EQM. Under the 2014 EQM VDA, 50% of the units confirmed will vestvested upon payment following the first anniversary of the grant date; the remaining 50% of the units confirmed will vest upon the payment date following the second anniversary of the grant date.  The performance metrics are the Partnership’swere EQM’s 2014 adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization performance as compared to its annual business plan and individual, business unit and partnership value driver performance over the period January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, 62,8452015, 28,696 awards including accrued cash distributions were outstanding under the 2014 EQM VDA. The first tranche of the confirmed awards is expected to vestvested and bewas paid in PartnershipEQM common units in February 2015. The remainder of the confirmed awards isare expected to vest and be paid in PartnershipEQM common units in the first quarter of 2016. The Partnership accountsEQM accounted for these awards as equity awards using the $58.79 grant date fair value per unit which was equal to the Partnership'sEQM's common unit price on the date prior to the date of grant. Due to the graded vesting of the award, the Partnership recognizes EQM recognized

85

Table of Contents

compensation cost over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche of the award as though the award was, in substance, multiple awards. The PartnershipEQM capitalizes certain labor overhead costs which include a portion of non-cash equity-based compensation. The total compensation cost capitalized in 2015 and 2014 was less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.3 million. There were no amounts capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. As of December 31, 2014, there was $0.9 million, of unrecognized compensation cost related to the 2014 EQM VDA which is expected to be recognized by December 31, 2015.respectively.
 
The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner has granted equity-based phantom units that vested upon grant to the independent directors of its general partner.the EQM General Partner. The value of the phantom units will be paid in EQM common units on a director’s termination of service on the general partner’sEQM General Partner’s Board of Directors. The PartnershipEQM accounted for these awards as equity awards and recorded compensation expense for the fair value of the awards at the grant date fair value. A total of 11,75914,433 independent director unit-based awards, including accrued distributions, were outstanding as of December 31, 2014.2015. A total of 2,220, 2,580 3,790 and 4,7803,790 unit-based awards were granted to the independent directors during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. The weighted average fair value of these grants, based on the Partnership’sEQM’s common unit price on the grant date, was $88.00, $58.79 $37.92 and $24.30$37.92 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively.
 
CommonEQM common units to be delivered pursuant to vesting of the equity basedequity-based awards may be common units acquired by the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in the open market or from any other person, issued directly from the Partnershipby EQM or any combination of the foregoing.
 
11.         Income Taxes
As a result of its limited partnership structure, EQM is not subject to federal and state income taxes. For federal and state income tax purposes, all income, expenses, gains, losses and tax credits generated by EQM flow through to the unitholders; accordingly, EQM does not record a provision for income taxes.
As discussed in Note 2, EQM completed the NWV Gathering Acquisition on March 17, 2015, the Jupiter Acquisition on May 7, 2014 and the Sunrise Merger on July 22, 2013. These were transactions between entities under common control and as a result EQM recast its consolidated financial statements to retrospectively reflect the operations of NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise. Prior to these transactions, the income of NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise was included as part of EQT’s consolidated federal tax return; therefore, the NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise operations were subject to income taxes.  Accordingly, the income tax effects associated with the operations of NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise prior to the NWV Gathering Acquisition, Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise Merger were reflected in EQM's consolidated financial statements. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, net current and deferred income tax liabilities of approximately $84.4 million, $51.8 million and $43.1 million, respectively, were eliminated through equity related to NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise.
The components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as follows: 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
 (Thousands)
Current:   
  
Federal$3,406
 $10,199
 $16,448
State299
 1,978
 462
Subtotal3,705
 12,177
 16,910
Deferred:   
  
Federal2,541
 18,886
 29,984
State457
 642
 7,679
Subtotal2,998
 19,528
 37,663
Total$6,703
 $31,705
 $54,573
Prior to the NWV Gathering Acquisition, Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise Merger, tax obligations for NWV Gathering, Jupiter and Sunrise were the responsibility of EQT. EQT’s consolidated federal income tax was allocated among the group’s members on a separate return basis with tax credits allocated to the members generating the credits.

86

Table of Contents


Income tax expense differed from amounts computed at the federal statutory rate of 35% on pre-tax book income from continuing operations as follows:
 Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
 (Thousands)
Tax at statutory rate$140,054
 $104,372
 $85,528
Partnership income not subject to income taxes(133,842) (74,426) (36,253)
State income taxes491
 1,758
 5,291
Regulatory assets
 
 3
Other
 1
 4
Income tax expense$6,703
 $31,705
 $54,573
      
Effective tax rate1.7% 10.6% 22.3%
The decrease in income tax expense resulted primarily from the change in the tax status of NWV Gathering in 2015, Jupiter in 2014 and Sunrise in 2013.

EQM’s historical uncertain tax positions were immaterial and were attributable to NWV Gathering for periods prior to the NWV Gathering Acquisition, Jupiter for periods prior to the Jupiter Acquisition and Sunrise for periods prior to the Sunrise Merger, as applicable. Additionally, EQT has indemnified EQM for these historical tax positions; therefore, EQM does not anticipate any future liabilities arising from these uncertain tax positions.
The following table summarizes the source and tax effects of temporary differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities: 
 December 31,
 2014
 (Thousands)
Deferred income taxes: 
Total deferred income tax assets$(840)
Total deferred income tax liabilities78,583
Total net deferred income tax liabilities$77,743
  
Total deferred income tax liabilities/(assets): 
PP&E tax deductions in excess of book deductions$78,583
Other (reported as other current assets)(840)
Total net deferred income tax liabilities$77,743
At December 31, 2014, there was no valuation allowance relating to deferred tax assets as the entire balance was expected to be realized. The deferred tax liabilities principally consisted of temporary differences between financial and tax reporting for EQM’s property, plant and equipment (PP&E) for NWV Gathering assets prior to their ownership by EQM. The deferred tax assets and liabilities were eliminated in connection with the NWV Gathering Acquisition.

EQT has indemnified EQM from and against any losses suffered or incurred by EQM and related to or arising out of or in connection with any federal, state or local income tax liabilities attributable to the ownership or operation of EQM’s assets prior to the acquisition of such assets from EQT. Therefore, EQM does not anticipate any future liabilities arising from the historical deferred tax liabilities.

12.     Lease Obligations
 
On December 17, 2013, the PartnershipEQM entered into a lease with EQT for the AVC facilities with an initial term of 25 years. Under the lease, the PartnershipEQM operates the facilities as part of its transmission and storage system under the rates, terms and conditions of its FERC-approved tariff.  The AVC facilities include an approximately 200 mile200-mile pipeline that interconnects with the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage system and providesprovided 450 MMcf per day of additional firm capacity to the Partnership’sEQM’s system, four associated

87

Table of Contents

natural gas storage reservoirs with approximately 260 MMcf per day of peak withdrawal capabilitycapacity and 15 Bcf of working gas capacity. Of the total 15approximately 11 Bcf of working gas capacity the Partnership leases 13 Bcf.as of December 31, 2015. The lease payment due each month is the lesser of the following alternatives: (1) a revenue-based payment

81

Table of Contents

reflecting the revenues generated by the operation of AVC minus the actual costs of operating AVC and (2) a payment based on depreciation expense and pre-tax return on invested capital for AVC. As a result, the payments to be made under the AVC lease will be variable. Any difference between the estimated minimum lease payments at inception of the lease and the actual lease payment is recorded to interest expense as contingent rent. For the year ended December 31, 2014, contingent rentals were approximately $3.4 million.
 
Management determined that the AVC lease was a capital lease under GAAP. The gross capital lease assets and obligations recorded in 2013 were approximately $134.4 million. The PartnershipEQM expects modernization capital expenditures will be incurred primarily by EQT to upgrade the AVC assets. As the capital expenditures are incurred by EQT, the Partnership'sEQM's capital lease assets and obligations will increase. In 2015 and 2014, modernization capital expenditures incurred by EQT were approximately $35.7 million and $9.2 million, respectively, which increased the capital lease assets and obligations. Cash payments made under the lease were $16.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.
 
ForThe following table summarizes amounts recorded related to the capital lease for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013,2013.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
 (Thousands)
Interest expense (including contingent rent of $7.5 million, $3.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively) (a)
$23,225
 $19,888
 $843
Depreciation expense8,734
 5,735
 443
Cash payments under the lease$25,366
 $16,710
 $

(a) As a result of the variability in the payments under the lease, interest expense which includes contingent rent, of $19.9approximately $5.7 million and $0.8$2.7 million, respectively, and depreciation expense of $5.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, were recorded related to the capital lease. Of the $19.9 million interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2014, approximately $2.7 million was unpaid and therefore increased the capital lease obligation due tofor the variability in the payments under the lease. Atyears ended December 31, 2014, accumulated depreciation was $6.2 million, net2015 and 2014.

The following table summarizes capital lease assets were $137.4 millionrelated balances on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and total2014.
 As of December 31,
 2015 2014
 (Thousands)
Gross capital lease assets$179,264
 $143,556
Accumulated depreciation(14,912) (6,178)
Net capital lease assets$164,352
 $137,378
    
Capital lease obligations, current portion (a)
$5,496
 $3,760
Capital lease obligations, long-term portion$175,660
 $143,828

(a) The current portion of the capital lease obligations were $147.6 million. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the current portion of capital lease obligations was $3.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and wasis included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

88

Table of Contents


The following is a schedule of the estimated future minimum lease payments under the capital lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2014:2015:
Year ending
December 31,
Year ending December 31,
(Thousands)(Thousands)
2015$21,383
201618,200
$20,220
201720,477
20,477
201820,214
20,214
201918,048
18,048
202017,783
Later years304,759
286,976
Total minimum lease payments (a)
403,081
383,718
Less: Amount representing interest (b)
(255,493)(202,562)
Present value of net minimum lease payments$147,588
$181,156

(a) There were no amounts representing contingent rentals or executory costs (such as taxes, maintenance and insurance) included in the total minimum lease payments.
(b) Amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to the present value of the obligation at December 31, 20142015 as the present value calculated at the Partnership’sEQM’s incremental borrowing rate exceeded the fair value of the property at inception of the lease.
 
13.         Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are recoverable or reimbursable over various periods and do not earn a return on investment. EQM believes that it will continue to be subject to rate regulation that will provide for the recovery or reimbursement of its regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities.  Regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are included in other assets and other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 As of December 31,
 2015 2014
 (Thousands)
Regulatory assets:   
Deferred taxes (a)
$12,608
 $13,378
Other recoverable costs (b)
309
 1,654
Total regulatory assets$12,917
 $15,032
    
Regulatory liabilities:   
On-going post-retirement benefits other than pensions (c)
$5,596
 $4,451
Other reimbursable costs (d)
866
 2,091
Total regulatory liabilities$6,462
 $6,542

(a) The regulatory asset for deferred taxes primarily related to deferred income taxes recoverable through future rates on a historical deferred tax position and the equity component of AFUDC. EQM expects to recover the amortization of the deferred tax position ratably over the corresponding life of the underlying assets that created the difference. Taxes on the equity component of AFUDC and the offsetting deferred income taxes will be collected through rates over the depreciable lives of the long-lived assets to which they relate. The amounts established for deferred taxes were primarily generated before EQM's tax status changed in July 2012 when EQM was included as part of EQT’s consolidated federal tax return.

(b) Regulatory assets associated with other recoverable costs primarily related to the recovery of storage base gas.

89

Table of Contents

(c) EQM defers expenses for on-going post-retirement benefits other than pensions which are subject to recovery in approved rates.  The regulatory liability reflects lower cumulative actuarial expenses than the amounts recovered through rates, which could be subject to reimbursement to customers in the next rate case.

(d) Regulatory liabilities associated with other reimbursable costs primarily related to the storage retainage tracker on the AVC system. EQM defers the monthly over or under recovery of storage retainage gas on the AVC system and annually returns the excess to or recovers the deficiency from customers.
14.         Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Employees of EQT operate EQM’s assets. EQT charges EQM for the payroll and benefit costs associated with these individuals and for retirees of Equitrans. EQT carries the obligations for pension and other employee-related benefits in its financial statements.

Equitrans’ retirees participate in a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by EQT. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, EQM reimbursed EQT approximately $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for funding of this plan. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, EQM was allocated $0.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of the expenses associated with the plan.

EQT terminated the plan effective December 31, 2014 and expects to complete the termination process by the end of 2016. In connection with the termination, EQT will fully fund the defined benefit pension plan by purchasing one or more annuities for participants from an insurance company or other financial institution. EQM will reimburse EQT for its proportionate share of such funding based upon the proportion of the plan’s total liabilities allocable to Equitrans retirees. Such reimbursement, currently expected to be approximately $2.1 million, is not expected to significantly impact EQM's financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.
EQM contributes to a defined contribution plan sponsored by EQT. The contribution amount is a percentage of allocated base salary. In 2015, 2014 and 2013, EQM was charged its contribution percentage through the EQT payroll and benefit costs discussed in Note 5.
The individuals who operate EQM’s assets and Equitrans' retirees participate in certain other post-employment benefit plans sponsored by EQT. EQM was allocated $0.1 million and $0.2 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, of the expenses associated with these plans. There were no allocations in 2015.
EQM recognizes expenses for ongoing post-retirement benefits other than pensions, which are subject to recovery in the approved rates. Expenses recognized by EQM for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 for ongoing post-retirement benefits other than pensions were approximately $1.2 million each year.
15.      Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
The Partnership’sEQM's transmission and storage and gathering operations provide services to utility and end-user customers located in the northeastern United States. The PartnershipEQM also provides services to customers engaged in commodity procurement and delivery, including large industrial, utility, commercial and institutional customers and certain marketers primarily in the Appalachian and mid-Atlantic regions. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, EQT accounted for approximately 62%73%, 86%69% and 85%88%, respectively, of the Partnership’sEQM’s total revenues. Additionally for the yearyears ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, one other customer accounted for approximately 20%14% and 16% of the Partnership'sEQM's total revenues.revenues, respectively. Other than EQT, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Partnership'sEQM's total revenues in 2013 or 2012.2013.
 
Approximately 41%42% and 59%41% of third party accounts receivable balances of $16.5$17.1 million and $8.5$16.5 million as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively, represent amounts due from marketers. The PartnershipEQM manages the credit risk of sales to marketers by limiting the Partnership’sEQM’s dealings to those marketers that meetmeeting specified criteria for credit and liquidity strength and by actively monitoring these accounts. The PartnershipEQM may request a letter of credit, guarantee, performance bond

82

Table of Contents

or other credit enhancement from a marketer in order for that marketer to meet the Partnership’sEQM’s credit criteria. The PartnershipEQM did not experience any significant defaults on accounts receivable during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012.2013.
 
14.16.      Commitments and Contingencies
 
The PartnershipEQM is subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations, which are constantly changing, can require expenditures for remediation and in certain instances result in assessment of fines. The PartnershipEQM has established procedures for ongoing evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and assure

90

Table of Contents

compliance with regulatory policies and procedures.requirements. The estimated costs associated with identified situations that require remedial action are accrued. However, when recoverable through regulated rates, certain of these costs are deferred as regulatory assets. Ongoing expenditures for compliance with environmental law and regulations, including investments in plant and facilities to meet environmental requirements, have not been material. Management believes that any such required expenditures will not be significantly different in either nature or amount in the future and does not know of any environmental liabilities that will have a material effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.
 
In the ordinary course of business, various legal and regulatory claims and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Partnership.EQM.  While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the PartnershipEQM is unable to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of such claims and proceedings.  The PartnershipEQM accrues legal and other direct costs related to loss contingencies when actually incurred.  The PartnershipEQM has established reserves it believes to be appropriate for pending matters and, after consultation with counsel and giving appropriate consideration to available insurance, the PartnershipEQM believes that the ultimate outcome of any matter currently pending against the PartnershipEQM will not materially affect itsEQM's business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to make distributions.

See Note 6 for discussion of the MVP Joint Venture guarantee.
 
15.17.      Interim Financial Information (Unaudited)
 
The following table presents a summary of the Partnership'sEQM's operating results by quarter for the years ended December 31, 20142015 and 2013.2014.  
 Three months ended Three Months Ended
 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
 (Thousands, except per unit amounts) (Thousands, except per unit amounts)
2014  
  
  
  
Total operating revenues $93,411
 $91,568
 $95,844
 $112,136
2015  
  
  
  
Operating revenues $154,811
 $144,613
 $148,789
 $165,921
Operating income 63,956
 61,540
 64,387
 83,853
 112,752
 101,396
 102,911
 120,749
Net income $49,504
 $52,080
 $56,533
 $74,656
 $95,306
 $91,319
 $94,116
 $112,709
Net income per limited partner unit: (a)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Basic $0.69
 $0.81
 $0.86
 $1.12
 $1.18
 $1.12
 $1.12
 $1.27
Diluted $0.69
 $0.81
 $0.85
 $1.12
 $1.18
 $1.12
 $1.12
 $1.26
2013  
  
  
  
Total operating revenues $69,552
 $75,671
 $77,476
 $81,013
2014  
  
  
  
Operating revenues $107,908
 $109,327
 $120,922
 $138,390
Operating income 49,293
 52,840
 53,924
 57,052
 72,617
 72,400
 81,866
 99,829
Net income $39,735
 $40,659
 $44,054
 $46,659
 $54,998
 $58,968
 $67,701
 $84,833
Net income per limited partner unit: (a)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Basic $0.68
 $0.59
 $0.61
 $0.62
 $0.69
 $0.81
 $0.86
 $1.12
Diluted $0.68
 $0.59
 $0.60
 $0.62
 $0.69
 $0.81
 $0.85
 $1.12

(a)      Quarterly net income per limited partner unit amounts are stand-alone calculations and may not be additive to full-year amounts due to rounding and changes in outstanding units.
 
18.Subsequent Events

16.          Subsidiary GuarantorsSee Note 6 for discussion of the ConEd Transaction.

The Partnership and EQT Midstream Finance Corporation (a 100% owned subsidiary$299 million of the Partnership whose primary purpose is to act as co-issuer of debt securities) filed a registration statementborrowings under EQM's credit facility at December 31, 2015 were repaid on Form S-3 with the SEC on July 1, 2013, as amended by a post-effective amendment filed with the SEC on June 26, 2014. The purpose of the Form S-3 was to register, among other securities, debt securities. Certain subsidiaries of the Partnership (the Subsidiary Guarantors) are co-registrants with the Partnership, and the registration statement registered guarantees of debt securities by one or more of theFebruary 8, 2016.

8391

Table of Contents

Subsidiary Guarantors. The Subsidiary Guarantors are 100% owned by the Partnership and any guarantees by the Subsidiary Guarantors will be full and unconditional. Subsidiaries of the Partnership other than the Subsidiary Guarantors and EQT Midstream Finance Corporation, if any, are minor. As further discussed in Note 7, during the third quarter of 2014 the Partnership issued 4.00% Senior Notes. The payment obligations under the 4.00% Senior Notes were unconditionally guaranteed by each of the Partnership's subsidiaries that guaranteed the Partnership's credit facility (other than EQT Midstream Finance Corporation). See Note 17 for a discussion of the release of these guarantees.

17.Subsequent Events
On January 22, 2015, the Partnership announced that the Board of Directors of its general partner declared a cash distribution to the Partnership’s unitholders for the fourth quarter of 2014 of $0.58 per common and subordinated unit, $0.8 million to the general partner related to its 2% general partner interest and $5.2 million to the general partner related to its incentive distribution rights. The cash distribution will be paid on February 13, 2015 to unitholders of record at the close of business on February 3, 2015. As a result of this cash distribution, the subordination period with respect to the Partnership’s 17,339,718 subordinated units will expire on February 17, 2015 and all of the outstanding Partnership subordinated units will convert into Partnership common units on a one-for-one basis on that day.

On January 22, 2015, the Partnership amended its credit facility to, among other things: exclude the Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (MVP) joint venture from the definitions of “Consolidated Debt”, “Consolidated EBITDA”, “Consolidated Subsidiary” and “Subsidiary”; permit MVP to incur non-recourse debt which may be secured by a pledge of the interests of MVP without affecting the calculation of the consolidated leverage ratio in the credit facility, and release the subsidiary guarantors under the credit facility from their guarantees of the obligations under the credit facility. In connection with the release of the subsidiary guarantors from their guarantees under the credit facility, the Senior Note Guarantors were released from their guarantees of the 4.00% Senior Notes.




84

Table of Contents

Item 9.           Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
Not Applicable.
 
Item 9A.        Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of management of the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner, including the general partner’sEQM General Partner’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, an evaluation of the Partnership’sEQM’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)), was conducted as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner concluded that the Partnership’sEQM’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fourth quarter of 20142015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’sEQM’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
The management of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  The Partnership’sEQM’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Partnership’sEQM’s management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.  Accordingly, even effective controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
The management of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’sEQM’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2015.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).  Based on this assessment, management concluded that the PartnershipEQM maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2015.
 
Ernst & Young LLP (Ernst & Young), the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Partnership’s Consolidated Financial Statements,EQM’s consolidated financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the Partnership’sEQM’s internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young’s attestation report on the Partnership’sEQM’s internal control over financial reporting appears in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 9B.      Other Information
 
Not Applicable.

8592

Table of Contents


PART III

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to "EQT Midstream Partners" or "EQM" refer to EQT Midstream Partners, LP and its subsidiaries. EQM’s general partner, EQT Midstream Services, LLC (the EQM General Partner), is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of EQT GP Holdings, LP (EQGP), which is a subsidiary of EQT Corporation (EQT). EQT GP Services, LLC, which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT, is the general partner of EQGP (the EQGP General Partner). References to "EQT" refer to EQT Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, excluding EQM and the EQM General Partner.
Item 10.         Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
Directors and Executive Officers of the Partnership’sEQM’s General Partner
 
The PartnershipEQM is managed and operated by the directors and officers of the EQM General Partner. Through its general partner,ownership and control of the EQGP General Partner, EQT Midstream Services, LLC. Theappoints the directors of the Partnership’s general partner are appointed by EQT, and unitholdersEQM General Partner. Unitholders are not entitled to elect the directors of the general partnerEQM General Partner or directly or indirectly participate in the Partnership’sEQM’s management or operations. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner (Board) has seven directors, of which three members are independent as defined under the independence standards established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act. The NYSE does not require a publicly traded limited partnership like the PartnershipEQM to have a majority of independent directors on the board of directors of its general partner or to establish a compensation or a nominating and corporate governance committee.

Executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner manage the day-to-day affairs of the Partnership’sEQM’s business and conduct the Partnership’sEQM’s operations. All of the executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner are employees of EQT and devote such portion of their productive time to the Partnership’sEQM’s business and affairs as is required to manage and conduct the Partnership’sEQM’s operations. Pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement among EQM, the Partnership, its general partnerEQM General Partner and EQT, the PartnershipEQM is required to reimburse EQT for (i) allocated expenses of personnel who perform services for the Partnership’sEQM’s benefit, and (ii) allocated general and administrative expenses. Please read Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence - Agreements with EQT - Omnibus Agreement."

The executive officers and directors of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner as of February 12, 201511, 2016 are as follows:
Name Age Position with EQT Midstream Services, LLC
David L. Porges 5758 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Philip P. Conti 5556 Director, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Randall L. Crawford 5253 Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Lewis B. Gardner 5758 Director
Theresa Z. Bone 5152 Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
Julian M. Bott 5253 Director
Michael A. Bryson 6869 Director
Lara E. Washington 4748 Director
 
Mr. Porges was appointed as Chairman of the Board and as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in January 2012. Mr. Porges has served as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the EQGP General Partner since January 2015. Mr. Porges is currently the Chairman President and Chief Executive Officer of EQT and has held such positions since May 2011.December 2015. Mr. Porges was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of EQT from May 2011 to December 2015, and President, Chief Executive Officer and Directordirector of EQT from April 2010 through May 2011 and President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of EQT from February 2007 through April 2010. Mr. Porges has served as a member of EQT's board since May 2002.2011.

Mr. Porges brings extensive business, leadership, management and financial experience, as well as tremendous knowledge of the Partnership’sEQM’s operations, culture and industry, to the Board. Mr. Porges has served in a number of senior management positions with EQT since joining EQT as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 1998. He has also served as a member of EQT’s board since May 2002. Prior to joining EQT, Mr. Porges held various senior positions within the investment banking industry and also held several managerial positions with Exxon Corporation (now, Exxon Mobil Corporation, an international oil and gas company). Mr. Porges served on the board of directors of Westport Resources Corp. (an oil and natural gas production company that is now part of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation) from April 2000 through 2004. Mr. Porges' strong financial and industry experience, along with his understanding of the Partnership’sEQM’s business operations and culture, enable Mr. Porges to provide unique and valuable perspectives on most issues facing the Partnership.EQM.

93

Table of Contents


       Mr. Contiwas appointed as a director and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM
General Partner in January 2012. Mr. Conti has served as a director and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the EQGP General Partner since January 2015. Mr. Conti is currently the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of EQT and has held such position since February 2007. As previously disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 10, 2015, Mr. Conti has advised the EQM General Partner and EQT that he intends to retire at the end of 2016. EQT has retained an executive search firm to help identify his successor. Following the appointment of his successor, Mr. Conti is expected to continue to serve as an employee of EQT in some capacity through 2016 to ensure a smooth transition.

       Mr. Conti brings significant energy industry management, finance and corporate development experience to the Board. Since joining EQT in 1996, Mr. Conti has served in a number of finance, business planning and business development

86

Table of Contents

senior management positions. From 1992 to 1996, Mr. Conti was vice presidentVice President in the natural resources department at The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (formerly PNC Bank Corporation). Prior to that, he was a banking officer in the energy and utilities department of Mellon Bank, N.A., and before that, senior production engineer at Tenneco Oil Company. Given his experience as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of EQT, Mr. Conti has a thorough understanding of the Partnership’sEQM’s capital structure and financing requirements, enabling him to provide leadership to the Board in these areas. Mr. Conti also brings valuable industry financial expertise from his prior role as an energy industry banker, including experience with capital markets transactions.

       Mr. Crawford was appointed as a director of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in January 2012. Mr. Crawford has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner since December 2013; and from January 2012 to December 2013, Mr. Crawford served as Executive Vice President. Mr. Crawford is currently the Senior Vice President and President, Midstream and Commercial of EQT and has held such position since December 2013. Mr. Crawford was Senior Vice President and President, Midstream, Commercial and Distribution from April 2010 to December 2013 and Senior Vice President and President, Midstream and Distribution from January 2008 to April 2010.2013.

       Mr. Crawford brings deep business, senior management and technical industry experience as well as in-depth knowledge of the Partnership’sEQM’s business operations to the Board. Since 2007, Mr. Crawford has served as President of EQT's midstream operations, including the Partnership’sEQM’s operations. In this role, Mr. Crawford is responsible for executing the growth strategy for EQT's natural gas midstream and production marketing companies operating in the rapidly growing Marcellus and Utica Shale natural gas supply regions. Prior to joining EQT, Mr. Crawford held various financial and regulatory management positions with Consolidated Natural Gas Company (now part of Dominion Resources, Inc.) in Pittsburgh, and started his career with Price Waterhouse LLC Utility Services Practice. Mr. Crawford's extensive understanding of the Partnership’sEQM’s assets and operations enables him to bring valuable perspectives to the Board, particularly with respect to setting and implementing the Partnership’sEQM’s business strategy.

       Mr. Gardner was appointed as a director of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in January 2012. Mr. Gardner has served as a director of the EQGP General Partner since January 2015. Mr. Gardner is currently the General Counsel and Vice President, External Affairs of EQT and has held such position since April 2008.

       In his current role with EQT, Mr. Gardner oversees legal and external affairs, which includes the safety and environmental, governmental relations and corporate communications functions. Prior to joining EQT in 2003, Mr. Gardner was a partner in the Houston and Austin, Texas offices of Brown, McCarroll & Oaks Hartline, general counsel to General Glass International Corp., a privately held glass manufacturing and trading company, and senior counsel, employment law with Northrop Grumman Corporation (formerly TRW, Inc.). Mr. Gardner's experiences enable him to provide insight to the Board with respect to legal and external affairs issues, along with providing valuable perspectives with respect to business management and corporate governance issues.

       Ms. Bone was appointed as Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in October 2013; and from January 2012 to October 2013, Ms. Bone served as Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer. Ms. Bone has served as Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer of the EQGP General Partner since January 2015. Ms. Bone is currently the Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer of EQT and has held such position since October 2013. From July 2007 to October 2013, Ms. Bone served as Vice President and Corporate Controller of EQT.

Mr. Bottwas appointed as a director of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in May 2012. Mr. Bott is currently the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of SandRidge Energy, Inc., a publicly traded oil and natural gas exploration and production company, and has held such position since August 2015. From December 2009 to August 2015, Mr. Bott served as the Chief Financial Officer of Texas American Resources Company, a privately held oil and gas acquisition, exploration and production company, and has held such position since December 2009.company. Prior to that, Mr. Bott held various senior energy industry focused positions within the investment banking and financial advisory industries.


94

Table of Contents

Mr. Bott has significant experience in energy company senior management, finance and corporate development. Mr. Bott is able to draw upon his diverse senior management and investment banking experience to provide guidance with respect to accounting matters, financial markets, financing transactions and energy company operations.

Mr. Brysonwas appointed as a director of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in May 2012. Mr. Bryson retired in June 2008 as Executive Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, a financial services firm. He obtained such position in July 2007 following the merger of Mellon Financial Corporation and The Bank of New York. Prior to the merger, Mr. Bryson served in various senior management positions over a 33-year career with Mellon Financial Corporation, including his service as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from December 2001 to June 2007.

Mr. Bryson brings to the Board over three decades of management and financial experience, having served as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of a large publicly traded financial institution. In these roles, Mr. Bryson obtained a

87

Table of Contents

wealth of experience related to financial statement preparation, auditing and accounting matters, financial markets, financing transactions and investor relations.

Ms. Washington was appointed as a director of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in February 2013. Ms. Washington is currently President of the Allegheny County Rehabilitation Corporation (AHRCO), a privately held residential property management company serving Western Pennsylvania. She obtained such position in May 2008. Ms. Washington joined AHRCO in 2001 as Vice President of Development. Prior to joining AHRCO, Ms. Washington was a senior consultant with PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP.

Ms. Washington’s service as President of a private company provides significant senior management, leadership and financial experience. Ms. Washington utilizes her broad business experience to provide valuable insights with respect to general business and management issues facing the Partnership.EQM.
 
Meetings of Non-Management Directors and Communications with Directors
 
At least annually, all of the independent directors of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner meet in executive session without management participation or participation by non-independent directors. Mr. Bryson, as the Chairman of the audit committee,Audit Committee, serves as the presiding director for such executive sessions. The presiding director may be contacted by mail or courier service c/o EQT Midstream Services, LLC, 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222, Attn: Presiding Director or by email at presidingdirector@eqtmidstreampartners.com.
 
Committees of the Board of Directors
 
The board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard has two standing committees: an audit committeeAudit Committee and a conflicts committee.Conflicts Committee. The NYSE does not require a publicly traded limited partnership like the PartnershipEQM to have a majority of independent directors on the board of directors of its general partner or to establish a compensation or a nominating and corporate governance committee.
 
Audit Committee
 
The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner is required by the NYSE to have an audit committeeAudit Committee of at least three members and all of the audit committeeAudit Committee members must meet the independence and experience requirements established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act.

The audit committeeAudit Committee consists of Messrs. Bryson (Chairman) and Bott and Ms. Washington. Each member of the audit committeeAudit Committee satisfies the independence requirements established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act and isare financially literate.  Additionally, the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard has determined that each member of the audit committeeAudit Committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined under the SEC’s regulations. This designation is a disclosure requirement of the SEC related to each audit committee members’Audit Committee member’s experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters.  The designation does not impose upon the audit committeeAudit Committee members any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than those generally imposed on them as members of the audit committeeAudit Committee and the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partner.Board.  As audit committee financial experts, each member of the audit committeeAudit Committee also has the accounting or related financial management expertise required by the NYSE rules.

The audit committeeAudit Committee assists the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard in its oversight of the integrity of the Partnership’sEQM’s financial statements and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and corporate policies and controls. The audit committeeAudit Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate the Partnership’sEQM’s independent registered public accounting firm, approve all auditing services and related fees and the terms thereof, and pre-approve any non-audit services to be rendered by the Partnership’sEQM’s independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committee

95

Table of Contents

Audit Committee is also responsible for confirming the independence and objectivityqualifications of the Partnership’sEQM’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Conflicts Committee
 
The conflicts committeeConflicts Committee consists of Messrs. Bott (Chairman) and Bryson and Ms. Washington. The conflicts committee,Conflicts Committee, upon request by the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner, determines whether certain transactions, which may be deemed conflicts of interest, are in the best interests of the Partnership.EQM. There is no requirement that the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner seek the approval of the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee for the resolution of any conflict. The members of the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee may not be officers or employees of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner or directors, officers or employees of its affiliates, may not hold an ownership interest in the general partnerEQM General Partner or its affiliates other than EQM common units or awards under any long-term incentive plan,

88

Table of Contents

equity compensation plan or similar plan implemented by the general partnerEQM General Partner or the Partnership,EQM, and must meet the independence standards established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act to serve on an audit committee of a board of directors.the Audit Committee. Any matters approved by the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee in good faith will be deemed to be approved by all of the Partnership’sEQM’s partners and not a breach by the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner of any duties it may owe the PartnershipEQM or its unitholders. Any unitholder challenging any matter approved by the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee will have the burden of proving that the members of the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee did not subjectively believe that the matter was in the best interests of the Partnership.EQM. Moreover, any acts taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon the advice or opinions of experts such as legal counsel, accountants, appraisers, management consultants and investment bankers, where the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner (or any members of the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard including any member of the conflicts committee)Conflicts Committee) reasonably believes the advice or opinion to be within such person's professional or expert competence, shall be conclusively presumed to have been done or omitted in good faith.

Governance Principles
 
The PartnershipEQM has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all directors, officers, employees, and other personnel of the PartnershipEQM and its subsidiaries, as well as the Partnership’sEQM’s suppliers, vendors, agents, contractors and consultants. The code of business conduct and ethics, along with the Partnership’sEQM’s corporate governance guidelines and audit committeeAudit Committee charter, are posted on the Partnership’sEQM’s website, https://www.eqtmidstreampartners.com (accessible under the “Governance” caption of the “Investors” page), and a printed copy of any of these documents will be delivered free of charge on request by writing to the corporate secretaryCorporate Secretary of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner by mail or courier service c/o EQT Midstream Services, LLC, 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222, Attn: Corporate Secretary. The PartnershipEQM intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding certain amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of its code of business conduct and ethics by posting such information on the Partnership’sEQM’s website.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
 
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the directors and executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and all persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units with the SEC.  As a practical matter, the PartnershipEQM assists the directors and executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner by monitoring transactions and completing and filing Section 16 reports on their behalf.

     Based solely upon the Partnership’sEQM’s review of copies of filings or written representations from the reporting persons, the PartnershipEQM believes that all reports for the executive officers and directors of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units that were required to be filed under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act in 20142015 were filed on a timely basis.basis, except for the transactions described below.

Messrs. Bott and Bryson and Ms. Washington each filed a Form 4 on August 18, 2015. Messrs. Bott and Bryson reported eleven transactions, and Ms. Washington reported nine transactions, in each case related to EQM common units underlying distribution equivalent rights that were reinvested quarterly pursuant to phantom units awarded under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, that had not been previously reported as separate transactions.

Item 11.         Executive Compensation
 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The PartnershipEQM does not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing its business. The PartnershipEQM is managed and operated by the directors and officers of its general partner, EQT Midstream Services, LLC.the EQM General Partner. EQT employs and compensates all of the individuals who service the Partnership,EQM, including the executive officers of the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner, and these individuals devote such portion of their productive time to the Partnership’sEQM’s business and affairs as is required to manage and conduct the Partnership’sEQM’s operations. The PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT for all salaries and related benefits and expenses compensation

96

Table of Contents

for the employees of EQT who provide services to the PartnershipEQM pursuant to an allocation agreed upon between EQT and the Partnership under the terms of the omnibus agreement.EQM. Please read Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence - Agreements with EQT - Omnibus Agreement."

In 2014,2015, the officers of our general partnerthe EQM General Partner who are discussed below as our named executive officers were:

David L. Porges, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer;
Philip P. Conti, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Randall L. Crawford, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and
Theresa Z. Bone, Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer.

The executive officers of our general partner are also executive officers of EQT.EQT, and in the case of Messrs. Porges and Conti and Ms. Bone, the EQGP General Partner.


89

Table of Contents

Neither EQM nor the Partnership nor its general partnerEQM General Partner has a compensation committee. All decisions as to the compensation of the executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner are made by the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of EQT (the EQT MDC Committee). Therefore, neither EQM nor the Partnership nor its general partner hasEQM General Partner have any policies or programs relating to compensation, and neither EQM nor the Partnership nor its general partnerEQM General Partner make decisions relating to such compensation, though from time to time the Board of Directors of the general partnerEQM General Partner does approve awards granted under the EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Typically, such awards are previously approved by the EQT MDC Committee as part of the executive’s total EQT compensation. None of the executive officers of the general partnerEQM General Partner have employment agreements with the general partnerEQM General Partner or the PartnershipEQM or are otherwise specifically compensated for their service as an executive officer of the general partner.EQM General Partner.

A discussion of EQT’s compensation policies and programs as they apply to EQT’s named executive officers, including Messrs. Porges, Conti and Crawford, will be set forth in the proxy statement for EQT’s 20152016 annual meeting of shareholders (EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement). Except as described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, those same policies and programs also apply to Ms. Bone who is also an executive officer of EQT.

EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement will also contain a discussion of the 20142015 and 20152016 compensation of Messrs. Porges, Conti and Crawford. A discussion of Ms. Bone’s compensation for 20142015 and 20152016 is set forth below and was provided by EQT.

EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement will be available upon its filing on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and on EQT’s website at www.eqt.com by clicking on the “Investors” link on the main page followed by the “SEC Filings” link. EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement will also be available free of charge upon request by a unitholder to the Corporate Secretary of our general partnerthe EQM General Partner by mail or courier service c/o EQT Midstream Services, LLC, 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

Components of the Compensation Program

The following describes each element of Ms. Bone’s executive compensation arrangement with EQT.

Base Salary

In 2014, Ms. Bone’s base salary was $285,000. This salary approximates the market median of a 2014 general industry group of companies to be described in EQT’s 2015 Proxy Statement. In 2015, Ms. Bone’s base salary was adjusted to $300,000 from $285,000.$300,000. This salary adjustment was made to approximate base salary atapproximates the market median of a 2015 general industry group of companies to be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement. In 2016, Ms. Bone's base salary is the same as her 2015 salary, as that amount continues to approximate base salary at the market median of a 2016 general industry group of companies filed herewith as Exhibit 99 (the 2016 General Industry Group).

Annual Incentive

Ms. Bone participated in EQT’s Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (the Executive STIP) for the 20142015 plan year, which will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement. For the 20142015 plan year, the EQT MDC Committee approved a target annual incentive award for Ms. Bone of $135,000. This level approximated the market median of the 20142015 general industry group of companies. Based on EQT’s level of achievement with respect to the approved performance metric, Ms. Bone’s incentive target and her performance on EQT, business unit and individual value drivers, the EQT MDC Committee awarded Ms. Bone $275,000$255,000 for the 2015 plan year under the 2014 Executive STIP, which represented 204%189% of her target award. Ms. Bone’s award was in recognitionBone and her teams provided successful oversight of her 2014 performance during whichthe accounting, financial reporting, tax and credit functions as well as the related disclosure and control systems for EQT, EQM and EQGP.  In 2015, she led the accounting, development and implementation of new

97

Table of Contents

tax riskprocesses, some of which resulted in the identification of opportunities for continued structural flexibility and credit functions.others resulted in significant tax savings for EQT.  Ms. Bone and her teamalso provided leadership and support for a number of important transactions, including capital markets transactionsthe initial public offering of EQGP, two follow-on equity offerings for EQM and asset acquisitions and divestitures; developed critical new processes, including the standardization of carve-out accounting and tax support for the NWV Gathering Acquisition and implementation of new credit metrics for a broader array of commercial transactions; and strengthened the financial risk and tax functions. These accomplishments were inPreferred Interest Acquisition. In addition to providing successful oversight ofthe effective controls, tax analysis and enhanced process work, Ms. Bone and her team developed and implemented a financial accounting, financial reporting disclosure and control systems.framework for EQGP and the MVP Joint Venture and implemented several tax system applications to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of tax planning and compliance activities.

Ms. Bone will participate in EQT’s Executive STIP for the 20152016 plan year, which will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement, and her 2015Statement. Ms. Bone's 2016 target award is the same as her 20142015 target award.award as that amount continues to approximate the market median of the 2016 General Industry Group.

Long-Term Incentives

20142015 Long-Term Incentive Awards (2014 EPIP(2015 EQT Stock Options and 2014 VDA)2015 Incentive PSU Program)

Following analysis of EQT’s long-term incentive programs, and with input from its independent compensation consultant, the EQT MDC Committee designed a long-term incentive compensation program for Ms. Bone for 20142015 that

90

Table of Contents

included 2015 EQT stock options and performance units under the EQT Corporation 20142015 Executive Performance Incentive Program (the 2014 EPIP) and the EQT Corporation 2014 Value Driver Award Program (the 2014 VDA)2015 Incentive PSU Program):

TYPE OF AWARDAPPROXIMATE PERCENT OF VALUERATIONALE
2014 EPIP2015 EQT Stock Options50%25%Stock options encourage executives to focus broadly on behaviors that should lead to a sustained long-term increase in the price of EQT stock, which benefits all EQT shareholders.
2015 Incentive PSU Program75%The 2014 EPIP2015 Incentive PSU Program performance units drive long-term value directly related to EQT stock and natural gas produced volumes performance strongly aligningbut allow for the interestsdelivery of the executive with the interests ofsome value, assuming relative performance, even if EQT’s shareholders.
2014 VDA50%The 2014 VDA performancestock price declines. Performance units focus individual performance on activities aligned with EQT’s business plan and on EQT, business unit and individualhave stronger retention value drivers, which activities are critical to EQT’s long-term success.  than options but less leverage in a rising stock price environment.

The allocation of value to performance-based awards was largely driven by market comparison.Ms. Bone’s target award of 2,960 2014 EPIP units8,700 EQT stock options and 2,960 2014 VDA7,580 2015 Incentive PSU Program units was betweenat the 50th percentile and the 75th75th percentile of the 20142015 general industry peer group in value.The EQT MDC Committee determined to provide a long-term incentive award above the median of the marketvalue in recognition of Ms. Bone'sher work as the principal accounting officer for both EQT Corporationand EQM and the Partnership, which entailscontinued expansion of her responsibilities in finance, including oversight for accounting disclosuretax reporting and controls for two public companies. In addition, in 2014, Ms. Bone assumed additional responsibilities in the area of finance, working on important structural reviews and assuming oversight responsibility for financial risk and credit.strategy.

The 2014 EPIP2015 EQT stock options and the 2015 Incentive PSU Program will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement.

The performance measure for the 2014 VDA was adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA compared to EQT’s business plan.  Adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA was calculated consistent with all GAAP line items using a fixed natural gas price of $4.00 per Mcfe, normalized for weather and excluding the effects of acquisitions and dispositions of greater than $100 million. According to plan design, if adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA had been less than EQT’s business plan, then the performance multiplier would have been 0%.  If adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA equaled or exceeded EQT’s business plan, then the performance multiplier would have been 300%, subject to the discretion of the EQT MDC Committee to determine that a lower performance multiplier shall apply. The EQT MDC Committee has historically exercised such downward discretion based on consideration of an individual’s target award and performance on EQT, business unit and individual value drivers.
Adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA was $1,693 million, which satisfied the threshold performance goal and allowed the EQT MDC Committee to award performance awards equal to 300% of Ms. Bone’s target award. Consistent with plan design, in exercising its downward discretion, the EQT MDC Committee considered Ms. Bone’s target award and her performance on EQT, business unit and individual value drivers (see discussion above under “Components of the Compensation Program - Annual Incentive” for discussion of Ms. Bone’s performance) but focused to a greater degree on value drivers having a longer-term impact on EQT. After considering these factors, the EQT MDC Committee confirmed an award equal to 2.31x Ms. Bone's target award. Adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA along with a reconciliation thereof will be set forth in EQT's 2015 Proxy Statement.
Upon determination of the award by the EQT MDC Committee, the number of 2014 VDA units became fixed, fifty percent of the confirmed awards (including accrued dividends) are expected to vest and be settled in cash in the first quarter of 2015, and the balance (including accrued dividends) is expected to vest and be settled in the same manner in the first quarter of 2016, provided Ms. Bone is still employed by EQT on the payment date.

Long-Term Incentive Awards extending through and beyond 20142015

During 2014,2015, in addition to the awards described above, Ms. Bone held three-year cliff vested restricted EQT shares granted in 2013, as well as unvested awards under the EQT Corporation 2012 Executive Performance Incentive Program (the 2012 EPIP), the EQT Corporation 2013 Executive Performance Incentive Program (the 2013 EPIP)Incentive PSU Program), the EQT Corporation 2013 Value Driver Award Program (the 2013 VDA) and the EQM Total Return Program (the EQM TR Program), the EQT Corporation 2014 Executive Performance Incentive Program (the 2014 Incentive PSU Program), and the EQT Corporation 2014 Value Driver Award Program (the 2014 VDPSU) for which the relevant performance or service periods had not yet been completed. In early 2014,2015, the remaining fifty percent of the EQT Corporation 2013 VDAValue Driver Award Program (the 2013 VDPSU) was settled in EQT common stock, andstock. Also in early 2015, the EQT MDC Committee certified the relevant performance and authorized payoutpayouts of:

the EQT Corporation 2012 Executive Performance Incentive Program (the 2012 Incentive PSU Program) in EQT common stock forstock; and
fifty percent of the EQT Corporation 2011 Volume and Efficiency Program (the 2011 VEP). performance awards under the 2014 VDPSU in cash.

Please refer to the “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” to be included in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement for a description of the terms ofthe 2012 EPIP, the 2013 EPIPIncentive PSU Program, the 2014 Incentive PSU Program, the 2015 Incentive PSU Program and the EQM TR Program.


9198

Table of Contents

20152016 Long-Term Incentive Awards (2015(2016 EQT Stock options and 2015 EPIP)2016 Incentive PSU Program)

For 2015,2016, Ms. Bone’s long-term incentive award consisted of 8,7005,700 EQT stock options and 7,5805,060 performance units under the EQT Corporation 2015 Executive2016 Incentive Performance IncentiveShare Unit Program (the 2015 EPIP)2016 Incentive PSU Program). This award was at the 75th50th percentile of the 2015 general industry peer group in value in recognition2016 General Industry Group, consistent with EQT’s philosophy to generally establish target awards at the median of her work as the principal accounting officer for both EQT Corporationmarket, after considering the scope of the executive’s responsibilities and the Partnership and the continued expansionrecommendations of her responsibilities in finance, including oversight for tax reporting and strategy.EQT’s Chief Executive Officer. The 20152016 EQT stock options and the 2015 EPIP2016 Incentive PSU Program will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement.

2015 Special Award

In connection with the initial public offering of EQGP common units, Ms. Bone was offered the opportunity to purchase EQGP units through a Directed Unit Program (DUP). In order to recognize the efforts of Ms. Bone in connection with the offering and to encourage investment in EQGP, Ms. Bone was eligible to receive from EQT a special award that was, net of taxes, not less than the value of the EQGP units purchased by Ms. Bone through the DUP (subject to a maximum special award of $100,000) to be used by Ms. Bone for the purchase of additional EQGP units (see “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table). In addition, in order to provide liquidity to facilitate the purchase of EQGP units in the initial public offering, and in recognition of the already significant equity ownership level of Ms. Bone, the Board of Directors of EQT approved a purchase of EQT shares (at the market price) from Ms. Bone in an aggregate value equal to her maximum bonus.
Other Benefits

Ms. Bone’s health and welfare benefits, retirement program and other perquisites are consistent with the named executive officers of EQT, which benefits will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement, except that EQT does not make any contributions to a retirement annuity product offered by Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Co. on behalf of Ms. Bone.

Ms. Bone and EQT have entered into aan amended and restated confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition agreement and a change of control agreement, eachin 2015 on a basis generally consistent with the other executive officers of EQT.EQT, the rationale and terms of which will be described in EQT’s 2016 Proxy Statement. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below for more detail regarding these benefits.

Other Information

The actual fixed and at-risk components of Ms. Bone’s compensation package, as a percentage of actual total direct compensation (base salary and annual and long-term incentives), for 20142015 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table were: 18%16% and 82%84%, respectively. As of December 31, 2014,2015, Ms. Bone was required to maintain qualifying equity holdings equal to three times her base salary and she held qualifying holdings equal to 14.98.8 times her base salary. Qualifying equity holdings include EQT stock, EQM units and PartnershipEQGP units owned directly, EQT shares held in EQT’s 401(k) plan,time-based restricted stock and units, and performance-based awards for which only a service condition remains but do not include other performance-based awards or options.

Compensation Committee Report

Neither we nor our general partner has a compensation committee. The board of directors of our general partner has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above and based on this review and discussion has approved it for inclusion in this Form 10-K.

The board of directors of EQT Midstream Services, LLC:

David L. Porges
Philip P. Conti
Randall L. Crawford
Lewis B. Gardner
Julian M. Bott
Michael A. Bryson
Lara E. Washington


99

Table of Contents

Compensation Tables
 
The Summary Compensation Table below reflects the total compensation of the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and the two other executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner who were serving as executive officers at the end of 20142015 (the named executive officers) for services rendered to all EQT-related entities, including EQM, the Partnership, EQT Midstream Services, LLCEQM General Partner, EQGP, the EQGP General Partner and EQT. The compensation information set forth in this Item 11, “Executive Compensation,” was provided by EQT.


92

Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table
 
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITIONYEARSALARYBONUSSTOCK AWARDSOPTION AWARDS
NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION
TOTALYEARSALARYBONUSSTOCK AWARDSOPTION AWARDS
NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION
TOTAL
($) (1)($)($) (2)($) (3)($) (4)($) (5)($) ($) (1)($) (2)($) (3)($) (4)($) (5)($) (6)($)
David L. Porges
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
2014850,000

4,169,644
1,059,100
2,275,000
400,156
8,753,900
2013882,693

2,649,147
1,544,928
2,500,000
345,305
7,922,073
2012826,923

4,176,362
1,395,502
1,996,000
317,893
8,712,680
David L. Porges
President and Chief Executive Officer
2015850,000
1,000,000
6,690,025
1,072,610
2,100,000
393,613
12,106,248
2014850,000

4,169,644
1,059,100
2,275,000
400,156
8,753,900
2013882,693

2,649,147
1,544,928
2,500,000
345,305
7,922,073
Philip P. Conti Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2014404,846

1,843,334
469,475
840,000
178,022
3,735,677
2015426,516
500,000
2,517,402
403,970
780,000
183,881
4,811,769
2013415,385

900,531
525,008
950,000
157,523
2,948,447
2014404,846

1,843,334
469,475
840,000
178,022
3,735,677
2012400,001

1,151,708
427,356
730,000
144,991
2,854,056
2013415,385

900,531
525,008
950,000
157,523
2,948,447
Theresa Z. Bone Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer2014285,000

1,026,173

275,000
59,481
1,645,654
2015297,116
100,000
1,069,614
173,130
255,000
63,779
1,958,639
 2014285,000

1,026,173

275,000
59,481
1,645,654
   
Randall L. Crawford Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer2014448,461

2,150,834
547,350
962,500
204,558
4,313,703
2015460,905
500,000
2,936,499
471,630
900,000
200,457
5,469,491
2013459,000

1,263,199
737,352
1,100,000
171,235
3,730,786
2014448,461

2,150,834
547,350
962,500
204,558
4,313,703
2012436,923

1,707,462
590,912
820,000
164,055
3,719,352
2013459,000

1,263,199
737,352
1,100,000
171,235
3,730,786

(1)   Each named executive officer’s annual base salary is paid over 26 equal pay periods each year.  Due to the timing of EQT’s bi-weekly pay cycle, 2013 contained 27 pay dates, while 20122014 and 20142015 each contained the standard 26 pay dates.

(2)   This column reflects the total amount of each named executive officer’s bonus award in connection with the initial public offering of common units of EQGP.  See “2015 Special Award” under the caption “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below for further discussion of the 2015 Special Award.

(3)   This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair values determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for performance units granted in the applicable year under the 2012 EPIP, the EQM TR2013 Incentive PSU Program, the 2013 EPIP,2014 Incentive PSU Program, the 2014 EPIP2015 Incentive PSU Program, and, in the case of Ms. Bone, the 2014 VDAVDPSU (each as defined and described under the caption “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below), using the assumptions described below. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table for awards subject to performance conditions are based on the probable outcome as of the date of grant and exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures.

The 2012 EPIP was a three-year program that provided for EQT stock-based awards. Each named executive officer for whom compensation is reported for 2012 was granted an award under the 2012 EPIP on January 1, 2012. The vesting and payment of the awards is expected to occur in the first quarter of 2015. The performance period for the 2012 EPIP was January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2014. The grant date fair values of the awards were: $3,413,600 for Mr. Porges; $1,044,000 for Mr. Conti; and $1,445,600 for Mr. Crawford. The grant date fair values were computed by multiplying the number of units awarded to each applicable named executive officer (42,670 for Mr. Porges; 13,050 for Mr. Conti; and 18,070 for Mr. Crawford) by $80.00, the grant date fair value of each unit calculated using a Monte Carlo pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return: 0.36%; (ii) dividend yield: 5.97%; (iii) volatility: 37.26%; and (iv) term: three years. Assuming, instead, that the highest level of performance conditions would be achieved, the grant date fair values of these awards would have been: $5,834,696 for Mr. Porges; $1,784,457 for Mr. Conti; and $2,470,892for Mr. Crawford.

The EQM TR Program is a three and one-half year program (subject to certain quarterly extensions as described under “Stock Awards - EQM TR Program” under the caption “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below) that provides Partnership unit-based awards. Each named executive officer for whom compensation is reported for 2012 was granted an award on July 2, 2012. The performance period for the EQM TR Program is June 27, 2012 through December 31, 2015 (subject to quarterly extensions). The grant date fair values of the awards were: $762,762 for Mr. Porges; $107,708 for Mr. Conti; and $261,862 for Mr. Crawford. The grant date fair values were computed by multiplying the number of units awarded to each applicable named executive officer (38,100 for Mr. Porges; 5,380 for Mr. Conti; and 13,080 for Mr. Crawford) by $20.02, the grant date fair value of each unit calculated using a Monte Carlo pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return for periods within the contractual life of the awards based on the applicable U.S. Treasury yield curves in effect at the time of the grant; (ii) an expected quarterly distribution of $0.35 per Partnership common unit for the first year and assuming annual increases of 10% per annum thereafter; (iii) the annual historical volatility of a peer group of companies for the expected term of the awards (the valuation model calculated a range of expected volatilities of 27% to 72% and a weighted average expected volatility of 38%); and (iv) a term of five years.

The 2013 EPIPIncentive PSU Program is a three-year program that provides EQT stock-based awards. Each named executive officer for whom compensation is reported for 2013 was granted an award under the 2013 EPIPIncentive PSU Program on January 1, 2013. The vesting and payment of the awards is expected to occur in the first quarter of 2016. The performance period for the 2013 EPIP isIncentive PSU Program was January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015. The grant date fair values of the awards were: $2,649,147 for Mr. Porges; $900,531 for Mr. Conti; and $1,263,199 for Mr. Crawford. The grant date fair values were computed by multiplying the number of units awarded to each applicable named executive officer (23,740 for Mr. Porges; 8,070 for Mr. Conti; and 11,320 for Mr. Crawford) by $111.59, the grant date

93

Table of Contents

fair value of each unit calculated using a Monte Carlo pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return: 0.36%; (ii) dividend yield: 0.72%; (iii) volatility: 32.97%; and (iv) term: three years. Assuming, instead, that the highest level of performance conditions would be achieved, the grant date fair values of these awards would have been: $3,323,600 for Mr. Porges; $1,129,800 for Mr. Conti; and $1,584,800 for Mr. Crawford.

The 2014 EPIPIncentive PSU Program is a three-year program that provides EQT stock-based awards. Each named executive officer was granted an award under the 2014 EPIPIncentive PSU Program on January 1, 2014. The performance period for the 2014 EPIPIncentive PSU Program is January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016. The grant date fair values of the awards were: $4,169,644 for Mr. Porges; $1,843,334 for Mr. Conti; $494,675 for Ms. Bone; and $2,150,834 for Mr. Crawford. The grant date fair values were computed by multiplying the number of units awarded to each named executive officer (24,950 for Mr. Porges; 11,030 for Mr. Conti; 2,960 for Ms. Bone; and 12,870 for Mr. Crawford) by $167.12, the grant date fair value of each unit calculated using a Monte Carlo pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return: 0.78%; (ii) dividend yield: 0.46%; (iii) volatility: 31.38%; and (iv) term:

100

Table of Contents

three years. Assuming, instead, that the highest level of performance conditions would be achieved, the grant date fair values of these awards would have been: $5,241,247 for Mr. Porges; $2,317,072 for Mr. Conti; $621,807 for Ms. Bone; and $2,703,601 for Mr. Crawford.

The 2015 Incentive PSU Program is a three-year program that provides EQT stock-based awards. Each named executive officer was granted an award under the 2015 Incentive PSU Program on January 1, 2015. The performance period for the 2015 Incentive PSU Program is January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. The grant date fair values of the awards were: $6,690,025 for Mr. Porges; $2,517,402 for Mr. Conti; $1,069,614 for Ms. Bone; and $2,936,499 for Mr. Crawford. The grant date fair values were computed by multiplying the number of units awarded to each named executive officer (47,410 for Mr. Porges; 17,840 for Mr. Conti; 7,580 for Ms. Bone; and 20,810 for Mr. Crawford) by $141.11, the grant date fair value of each unit calculated using a Monte Carlo pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return: 1.10%; (ii) dividend yield: 0.53%; (iii) volatility: 27.45%; and (iv) term: three years. Assuming, instead, that the highest level of performance conditions would be achieved, the grant date fair values of these awards would have been: $8,406,267 for Mr. Porges; $3,163,210 for Mr. Conti; $1,344,010 for Ms. Bone; and $3,689,821 for Mr. Crawford.

The 2014 VDAVDPSU is a two-year program that provides EQT stock-based awards. Ms. Bone was granted an award under the 2014 VDAVDPSU on January 1, 2014. No other named executive officer participates in the 2014 VDA.VDPSU. Fifty percent of the confirmed performance awards under the 2014 VDA will vestVDPSU vested on payment which is expected to occur in the first quarter ofon February 12, 2015, and the remainder of the confirmed performance awards are expected to vest and be paid out in the first quarter of 2016. The performance period for the 2014 VDAVDPSU was January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. The grant date fair value of the award was $531,498. The grant date fair value was computed by multiplying (i) the number of target units awarded to Ms. Bone (2,960) by (ii) $89.78, the closing stock price of EQT’s common stock on the date prior to the date of grant, by (iii) 2.0, the assumed performance multiple. Assuming, instead, that the highest level of performance conditions would be achieved, the grant date fair value of this award would have been $797,246.

See “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below for a further discussion of the 2012 EPIP, the EQM TR2013 Incentive PSU Program, the 2013 EPIP,2014 Incentive PSU Program, the 2014 EPIP2015 Incentive PSU Program and the 2014 VDA.VDPSU.
 
(3)(4)   This column reflects the grant date fair values of EQT stock option awards issuedgranted on January 1, 2012,2013, January 1, 20132014 and January 1, 2014.

The grant date fair values of the 2012 EQT stock option awards were calculated by multiplying the number of options awarded to the applicable named executive officer (105,800 for Mr. Porges; 32,400 for Mr. Conti; and 44,800 for Mr. Crawford) by $13.19, the grant date fair value of each option calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return: 0.89%; (ii) dividend yield: 1.64%; (iii) volatility factor: 31.44%; and (iv) expected term: five years.2015.

The grant date fair values of the 2013 EQT stock option awards were calculated by multiplying the number of shares underlying options awarded to the applicable named executive officer (92,400 for Mr. Porges; 31,400 for Mr. Conti; and 44,100 for Mr. Crawford) by $16.72, the grant date fair value of each option calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return: 0.76%; (ii) dividend yield: 0.22%; (iii) volatility factor: 31.69%; and (iv) expected term: five years.

The grant date fair values of the 2014 EQT stock option awards were calculated by multiplying the number of shares underlying options awarded to the applicable named executive officer (47,600 for Mr. Porges; 21,100 for Mr. Conti; and 24,600 for Mr. Crawford) by $22.25, the grant date fair value of each option calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return: 1.72%; (ii) dividend yield: 0.15%; (iii) volatility factor: 24.80%; and (iv) expected term: five years.

The grant date fair values of the 2015 EQT stock option awards were calculated by multiplying the number of shares underlying options awarded to the applicable named executive officer (53,900 for Mr. Porges; 20,300 for Mr. Conti; 8,700 for Ms. Bone; and 23,700 for Mr. Crawford) by $19.90, the grant date fair value of each option calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (i) risk-free rate of return: 1.66%; (ii) dividend yield: 0.12%; (iii) volatility factor: 30.12%; and (iv) expected term: five years.

See “Option Awards - EQT 20122013 Options”, “Option Awards - EQT 20132014 Options” and “Option Awards - EQT 20142015 Options” under the caption “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below for further discussion of the EQT 2012, 2013, 2014 and 20142015 options.
 
(4)(5)   This column reflects the dollar value of annual incentive compensation earned under the Executive STIP (as defined and described under the caption “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below) for the applicable plan year. The awards were paid to the named executive officers in cash in the first quarter of the following year. For the 2013 plan year, the Executive STIP awards for Messrs. Porges, Conti and Crawford included transaction recognition components for the completion of significant business transactions during 2013, including EQT’s sale of Equitable Gas Company, LLC, in the following amounts: $200,000 for Mr. Porges; $100,000 for Mr. Conti; and $100,000 for Mr. Crawford. See “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation - EQT Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (Executive STIP) under the caption “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below for further discussion of the Executive STIP for the 20142015 plan year.

(5)(6)   This column includes the dollar value of premiums paid by EQT for group life, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, EQT’s contributions to the 401(k) plan and the 2006 Payroll Deduction and Contribution Program and perquisites. For 2014,2015, these amounts were as follows:

94101

Table of Contents

 
 INSURANCE 
401(K)
CONTRIBUTIONS
 
2006
PAYROLL
DEDUCTION AND
CONTRIBUTION
PROGRAM 
 
PERQUISITES
(SEE BELOW)
 TOTAL INSURANCE 
401(K)
CONTRIBUTIONS
 
2006
PAYROLL
DEDUCTION AND
CONTRIBUTION
PROGRAM 
 
PERQUISITES
(SEE BELOW)
 TOTAL
NAME ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
David L. Porges 2,448
 23,400
 328,100
 46,208
 400,156
 2,448
 23,850
 302,900
 64,415
 393,613
Philip P. Conti 1,169
 23,400
 117,536
 35,917
 178,022
 1,244
 23,850
 106,936
 51,851
 183,881
Theresa Z. Bone 821
 23,400
 
 35,260
 59,481
 864
 23,850
 
 39,065
 63,779
Randall L. Crawford 1,296
 23,400
 137,962
 41,900
 204,558
 1,336
 23,850
 123,506
 51,765
 200,457
 
Once 401(k) contributions for Messrs. Porges, Conti and Crawford reach the maximum level permitted under the 401(k) plan or by regulation, EQT contributions are continued on an after-tax basis under the 2006 Payroll Deduction and Contribution Program through an annuity program offered by Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Co. Each year, EQT also contributes an amount equal to 11% of the annual incentive awards for each of Messrs. Porges, Conti and Crawford to such program.
 
The perquisites EQT provided to each named executive officer in 20142015 are itemized below:
 
CAR
ALLOWANCE 
 
COUNTRY AND
DINING CLUB
ANNUAL DUES 
 
FINANCIAL
PLANNING 
 PARKING PHYSICAL 
TOTAL
PERQUISITES
 
CAR
ALLOWANCE 
 
COUNTRY AND
DINING CLUB
ANNUAL DUES 
 
FINANCIAL
PLANNING 
 PARKING PHYSICAL OTHER 
TOTAL
PERQUISITES
NAME ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
David L. Porges 9,180
 15,518
 15,000
 2,160
 4,350
 46,208
 9,180
 15,922
 13,500
 2,280
 15,200
 8,333
 64,415
Philip P. Conti 9,060
 9,902
 10,400
 2,160
 4,395
 35,917
 9,060
 10,311
 15,000
 2,280
 15,200
 
 51,851
Theresa Z. Bone 9,060
 9,690
 10,000
 2,160
 4,350
 35,260
 9,060
 10,125
 10,000
 2,280
 7,600
 
 39,065
Randall L. Crawford 9,060
 12,930
 13,400
 2,160
 4,350
 41,900
 9,060
 13,142
 11,350
 2,280
 7,600
 8,333
 51,765
 
The car allowance is an amount paid to the executive intended to cover the annual cost of acquiring, maintaining and insuring a car. The entire cost of country and dining club dues has been included in the table although EQT believes that only a portion of the cost represents a perquisite. Financial planning is the actual cost to EQT of providing to each executive financial planning and tax preparation services. The physical is the actual cost to EQT for providing the executive physical benefit, which includes preferred access to healthcare professionals and related services for each named executive officer and his or her spouse. The other column reflects the actual cost to EQT in connection with travel assistance services procured by EQT for the benefit of Messrs. Porges and Crawford and their families. The named executive officers may use two tickets purchased by EQT to attend up to four sporting or other events when such tickets are not otherwise being used for business purposes. The costs of such tickets used for personal purposes are considered de minimisby EQT and are not included as perquisites in the Summary Compensation Table because there are no incremental costs to EQT associated with such use.


2014
102

Table of Contents

2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
  ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDSESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDSALL OTHER OPTION AWARDS; NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING OPTIONSEXERCISE OR BASE PRICE OF OPTION AWARDSGRANT DATE FAIR VALUE OF STOCK AND OPTION AWARDS  ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDSESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDSALL OTHER OPTION AWARDS; NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING OPTIONSEXERCISE OR BASE PRICE OF OPTION AWARDSGRANT DATE FAIR VALUE OF STOCK AND OPTION AWARDS
NAMETYPE OF AWARDGRANT DATEAPPROVAL DATETHRESHOLDTARGETMAXIMUMTHRESHOLDTARGETMAXIMUMTYPE OF AWARDGRANT DATEAPPROVAL DATETHRESHOLDTARGETMAXIMUMTHRESHOLDTARGETMAXIMUM
(1) ($)($) (2)(#)(#) (3)(#)($/SH)($)(1) ($)($) (2)(#)(#) (3)(#)($/SH)($)
David L. PorgesEPIP1/1/2014
12/10/2013




24,950
74,850


4,169,644
PSU1/1/2015
12/2/2014




47,410
142,230


6,690,025
ESTIP


850,000
5,000,000






ESTIP


850,000
5,000,000






SO1/1/2014
12/10/2013






47,600
89.78
1,059,100
SO1/1/2015
12/2/2014






53,900
75.70
1,072,610
Philip P. ContiEPIP1/1/2014
12/10/2013




11,030
33,090


1,843,344
PSU1/1/2015
12/2/2014




17,840
53,520


2,517,402
ESTIP


320,000
5,000,000






ESTIP


320,000
5,000,000






SO1/1/2014
12/10/2013






21,100
89.78
469,475
SO1/1/2015
12/2/2014






20,300
75.70
403,970
Theresa Z. BoneEPIP1/1/2014
12/10/2013




2,960
8,880


494,675
PSU1/1/2015
12/2/2014




7,580
22,740


1,069,614
ESTIP


135,000
5,000,000






ESTIP


135,000
5,000,000






VDA1/1/2014
12/10/2013




2,960
8,880


531,498
SO1/1/2015
12/2/2014






8,700
75.70
173,130
Randall L. CrawfordEPIP1/1/2014
12/10/2013




12,870
38,610


2,150,834
PSU1/1/2015
12/2/2014




20,810
62,430


2,936,499
ESTIP


385,000
5,000,000






ESTIP


385,000
5,000,000






SO1/1/2014
12/10/2013






24,600
89.78
547,350
SO1/1/2015
12/2/2014






23,700
75.70
471,630

95

Table of Contents

(1)Type of Award:
EPIPPSU      =     2014 EPIP2015 Incentive PSU Program Awards
ESTIP =    Executive STIP for the 20142015 Plan Year
SO      =     Stock Options
VDA =2014 VDA Awards
    
(2) These columns reflect the annual incentive award target and maximum amounts payable under the Executive STIP for the 20142015 plan year. Under the Executive STIP, a formula based on adjusted 20142015 EQT EBITDA compared to EQT’s business plan establishes the maximum payment from which the Management Development and CompensationEQT MDC Committee of EQT typically exercises its discretion downward in determining the actual payment. The payout amounts could range from no payment, to the percentage of base salary identified as the target annual incentive award (target), to $5 million (maximum). See “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation - EQT Executive STIP”Short-Term Incentive Plan (Executive STIP)” under the caption “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below for further discussion of the Executive STIP for the 20142015 plan year.

(3) These columns reflect the target and maximum number of units payable under the 2014 EPIP and the 2014 VDA.2015 Incentive PSU Program. Under the 2014 EPIP,2015 Incentive PSU Program, the performance measures are EQT’s total shareholder return (TSR) over the period January 1, 20142015 through December 31, 2016,2017, as ranked among the comparably measured TSR of the applicable peer group, and EQT’s production sales volume growth. The payout amounts for the 2014 EPIP2015 Incentive PSU Program could range from 0% of units granted, to 100% of units granted (target), to 300% of units granted (maximum), dependent upon the satisfaction of the performance measures over the performance period. Under the 2014 VDA, the performance metric is adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA compared to EQT’s business plan. The 2014 VDA payout amounts could range from 0% of awards granted, to 100% of awards granted (target), to 300% of awards granted (maximum), dependent upon adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA compared to EQT’s 2014 business plan. See “Stock Awards - EQT 2015 Executive Performance Incentive Plan (2014 EPIP)” and “Stock Awards - EQT Value Driver Performance Award Program (2014 VDA)(2015 Incentive PSU Program)” under the caption “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below for further discussion of the 2014 EPIP and 2014 VDA.2015 Incentive PSU Program.
 
NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE TO SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE AND 20142015 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE
 
Set forth below is a discussion of the material elements of compensation paid to our named executive officers as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table and the 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table above.
 
Base Salary
 
The base salary for each named executive officer reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above is the base salary actually earned and reflects a proportionate amount of any increase made during the applicable year.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation - EQT Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (Executive STIP)

Before or at the start of each year, the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of EQT (the EQT MDC Committee)Committee establishes the performance measure for determining awards under the Executive STIP. This performance measure establishes the maximum annual incentive award that the EQT MDC Committee may approve as “performance-based compensation” for tax purposes pursuant to Code Section 162(m) subject to the shareholder approved individual limit set forth in the Executive STIP but does not set an expectation for the amount of annual incentive that will actually be paid. The EQT MDC Committee is permitted to exercise, and has generally exercised, downward discretion downward in determining the actual payout under the annual incentive plan. The EQT MDC Committee

103

Table of Contents

may not exercise upward discretion. The performance measure approved for the Executive STIP for the 20142015 plan year was EQT’s 20142015 EBITDA calculated using a fixed natural gas price of $4.00 per Mcfe, normalized for weather and excluding the effects of acquisitions and dispositions greater than $100 million (adjusted 20142015 EQT EBITDA), compared to EQT’s 20142015 business plan as follows:
 
ADJUSTED 20142015 EQT EBITDA
COMPARED TO
BUSINESS PLAN
 
PERCENTAGE OF ADJUSTED 20142015
EQT EBITDA AVAILABLE FOR ALL
EQT EXECUTIVE OFFICER 20142015
ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARDS
At or above plan 2%
5% below plan 1.5%
25% below plan 1%
Greater than 25% below plan No bonus
 

96

Table of Contents

The percentage of adjusted 20142015 EQT EBITDA available for all executive officer annual incentives was interpolated between levels and capped at 2%. Actual adjusted 20142015 EQT EBITDA of $1,693$1,832 million exceeded plan by approximately 8%17%, which allowed the EQT MDC Committee to award annual incentives to EQT’s executive officers in an aggregate amount of $33.8$36.6 million, subject to a $5million cap per executive officer. The EQT MDC Committee exercised its discretion to pay each named executive officer a lesser amount based on the individual’s 20142015 target award and 20142015 performance on EQT, business unit and individual value drivers.

The Executive STIP provides that the annual awards will be paid in cash, subject to EQT MDC Committee discretion to pay in equity. The EQT MDC Committee typically considers settling awards in equity rather than cash only when an executive has not satisfied the applicable equity ownership guidelines.
 
Stock Awards - EQT 2012 Executive Performance Incentive Plan (2012 EPIP)
Awards under the 2012 EPIP were granted on January 1, 2012. Each named executive officer for whom compensation is reported for 2012 was granted an award under the 2012 EPIP.

The performance measures for the 2012 EPIP were:
EQT’s TSR over the period January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2014, as ranked among the comparably measured TSR of the applicable peer group; and
cumulative cash flow per share, which is the aggregate net cash provided by operating activities excluding changes in other assets and liabilities during the performance period, adjusted to reflect a fixed natural gas price of $4.00 per Mcf, divided by the average diluted common shares of EQT outstanding for each year in the performance period.

The payout opportunity under the 2012 EPIP ranged from:

no payout if EQT was one of the nine lowest-ranking companies in the applicable peer group as to TSR and had cumulative cash flow per share over the performance period of less than $15.90;
to target payout if EQT ranked seventeenth to fourteenth in the applicable peer group as to TSR and had cumulative cash flow per share over the performance period equal to $19.30;
to three times the target award if EQT was one of the four highest-ranking companies in the applicable peer group as to TSR and had cumulative cash flow per share over the performance period of at least $27.49.

Upon the EQT MDC Committee’s certification of the performance under, and confirmation of the payout multiple for, the 2012 EPIP, the share units will be distributed in shares of EQT common stock equal to the target award (including accrued dividends) multiplied by the applicable payout multiple.

Stock Awards - EQT Midstream Partners, LP Total Return Program (EQM TR Program)

Performance awards under the EQM TR Program, a program adopted under EQT’s 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, were granted on July 2, 2012. Each named executive officer for whom compensation is reported for 2012 was awarded performance units under the EQM TR Program.

The performance measure for the program iswas EQM total Partnership unitholder return of at least 10%, measured from June 27, 2012, the date of the Partnership’s initial public offering,EQM’s IPO, through December 31, 2015. If2015 (subject to quarterly extensions in the unitholder return measure is not achieved as of December 31, 2015,event the performance condition will nonetheless be satisfied if the 10% unitholder return threshold is satisfied as of the end of any calendar quarter ending after December 31, 2015 and on or before December 31, 2017.measure had not been achieved).

The payout opportunity under the EQM TR Program is:ranged from:

no payout if the total Partnership unitholder return iswas less than 10% over the performance period; or
target payout if the total unitholder return equalsequaled or exceedsexceeded 10% over the performance period.

If earned,The performance period for the performanceEQM TR Program ended on December 31, 2015. The awards (including accrued distributions) are expected to vest and be distributed in PartnershipEQM common units equal toat a 1.0X payout multiple in the target award (including accrued distributions).
first quarter of 2016.


97

Table of Contents

Stock Awards - EQT 2013 Executive Performance Incentive Plan (2013 EPIP)Incentive PSU Program)

Awards under the 2013 EPIPIncentive PSU Program were granted on January 1, 2013. Each named executive officer for whom compensation is reported for 2013 was granted an award under the 2013 EPIP.Incentive PSU Program.

The performance measures for the 2013 EPIPIncentive PSU Program are:

EQT’s TSR over the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015, as ranked among the comparably measured TSR of the applicable peer group; and
cumulative cash flow per share, which is the aggregate net cash provided by operating activities excluding changes in other assets and liabilities during the performance period, adjusted to reflect a fixed natural gas price of $2.79 per Mcf, divided by the average diluted common shares outstanding for each year in the performance period.

The payout opportunity under the 2013 EPIP rangesIncentive PSU Program ranged from:

no payout if EQT iswas one of the nine lowest-ranking companies in the applicable peer group as to TSR and hashad cumulative cash flow per share over the performance period of less than $16.59;

104

Table of Contents

to target payout if EQT ranksranked seventeenth to fourteenth in the applicable peer group as to TSR and hashad cumulative cash flow per share over the performance period equal to $18.30;
to three times the target award if EQT iswas one of the four highest-ranking companies in the applicable peer group as to TSR and hashad cumulative cash flow per share over the performance period of at least $24.15.

If earned,The performance period for the 2013 Incentive PSU Program ended on December 31, 2015, with EQT having achieved a TSR of negative 13%, resulting in a ranking of twelfth in the applicable peer group, and cumulative cash flow per share unitsof $28.83.  The awards (including accrued dividends) are expected to vest and be distributed in shares of EQT common stock equal toat a 2.4X payout multiple in the target award (including accrued dividends) multiplied by the applicable payout multiple.first quarter of 2016.

Stock Awards - EQT 2014 Executive Performance Incentive Plan (2014 EPIP)Incentive PSU Program)

Awards under the 2014 EPIPIncentive PSU Program were granted on January 1, 2014. Each named executive officer was granted an award under the 2014 EPIP.Incentive PSU Program.

The performance measures for the 2014 EPIPIncentive PSU Program are:

EQT’s TSR over the period January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016, as ranked among the comparably measured TSR of the applicable peer group; and
compound annual production sales volume growth over the performance period.

The payout opportunity under the 2014 EPIPIncentive PSU Program ranges from:

no payout if EQT is one of the nine lowest-ranking companies in the applicable peer group as to TSR and has compound annual production sales volume growth over the performance period of less than 0%;
to target payout if EQT ranks seventeenth to fourteenth in the applicable peer group as to TSR and has compound annual production sales volume growth over the performance period equal to 10%;
to three times the target award if EQT is one of the four highest-ranking companies in the applicable peer group as to TSR and has compound annual production sales volume growth over the performance period of at least 30%.

If earned, the share units are expected to be distributed in shares of EQT common stock equal to the target award (including accrued dividends) multiplied by the applicable payout multiple.

Stock Awards - EQT 2014 Value Driver Performance Award Program (2014 VDA)VDPSU)

Awards under the 2014 VDAVDPSU were granted on January 1, 2014. Ms. Bone was the only named executive officer awarded performance awards under the 2014 VDA.VDPSU. The performance measure for the 2014 VDAVDPSU was adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA compared to EQT’s 2014 business plan.

The payout opportunity under the 2014 VDAVDPSU was:

no payment if the adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA was less than EQT’s business plan; or

98

Table of Contents

three times the number of target awards granted if the adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA equaled or exceeded EQT’s business plan, subject to the EQT MDC Committee’s discretion to determine that a lower performance multiple applied. In exercising its discretion, the EQT MDC Committee was to consider and be guided by performance on EQT, business unit and individual value drivers.

Adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA was $1,693 million, which satisfied the threshold performance goal and allowed the EQT MDC Committee to confirm performance awards equal to 3.00X Ms. Bone’s target award. The EQT MDC Committee exercised downward discretion and confirmed Ms. Bone's award of 6,850 units under the 2014 VDA as described under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" above.VDPSU. Fifty-percent of the confirmed performance awards (including accrued dividends) are expected to bewere distributed in cash in the first quarter ofon February 12, 2015, and the remainder are expected to vest and be paiddistributed in cash in the first quarter of 2016, contingent upon continued employment with EQT on such date. Adjusted 2014 EQT EBITDA along with a reconciliation thereof will bewas set forth in Appendix B of EQT's 2015 Proxy Statement.

Stock Awards - EQT 2015 Executive Performance Incentive Plan (2015 Incentive PSU Program)

Awards under the 2015 Incentive PSU Program were granted on January 1, 2015. Each named executive officer was granted an award under the 2015 Incentive PSU Program.

105

Table of Contents


The performance measures for the 2015 Incentive PSU Program are:

EQT’s TSR over the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017, as ranked among the comparably measured TSR of the applicable peer group; and
compound annual production sales volume growth over the performance period.

The payout opportunity under the 2015 Incentive PSU Program ranges from:

no payout if EQT is one of the nine lowest-ranking companies in the applicable peer group as to TSR and has compound annual production sales volume growth over the performance period of less than 0%;
to target payout if EQT ranks seventeenth to fourteenth in the applicable peer group as to TSR and has compound annual production sales volume growth over the performance period equal to 6.4%;
to three times the target award if EQT is one of the four highest-ranking companies in the applicable peer group as to TSR and has compound annual production sales volume growth over the performance period of at least 26.4%.

If earned, the share units are expected to be distributed in shares of EQT common stock equal to the target award (including accrued dividends) multiplied by the applicable payout multiple.

See Item 12, “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” below for a discussion of the EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Option Awards - EQT 2012 Options

The 2012 options for EQT common stock were awarded on January 1, 2012 with an exercise price of $54.79. The options expire on January 1, 2022 and vested as follows: 50% on January 1, 2013 and 50% on January 1, 2014.

Option Awards - EQT 2013 Options

The 2013 options for EQT common stock were awarded on January 1, 2013 with an exercise price of $58.98. The options expire on January 1, 2023 and vested as follows: 50% on January 1, 2014 and 50% on January 1, 2015.

Option Awards - EQT 2014 Options

The 2014 options for EQT common stock were awarded on January 1, 2014 with an exercise price of $89.78. The options expire on January 1, 2024 and vest on January 1, 2017, contingent upon continued employment with EQT on such date.

Option Awards - EQT 2015 Options

The 2015 options for EQT common stock were awarded on January 1, 2015 with an exercise price of $75.70. The options expire on January 1, 2025 and vest on January 1, 2018, contingent upon continued employment with EQT on such date.

2015 Special Award

In connection with the initial public offering of EQGP common units in May 2015, the named executive officers (and other long-term incentive eligible employees as well as directors of EQT and EQGP) were offered the opportunity to purchase EQGP common units through the directed unit program (DUP) associated with EQGP’s initial public offering.  In order to recognize the efforts of the named executive officers in connection with the offering and to encourage their personal investment in EQGP, each named executive officer was eligible to receive from EQT a limited cash award to be used by the named executive officer to match his or her purchase of EQGP units.  Each named executive officer participated and benefited to the maximum amount approved for him or her.


99106

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table reflects all outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2014,2015, including equity awards of both EQT and the Partnership.
EQM. There were no outstanding EQGP equity awards to executive officers as of December 31, 2015.
OPTION AWARDSOPTION AWARDSEQUITY AWARDSOPTION AWARDSEQUITY AWARDS
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
EXERCISABLE
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
UNEXERCISABLE
OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED
MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET OR
PAYOUT VALUE
OF UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS
OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
EXERCISABLE
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
UNEXERCISABLE
OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT
VESTED
MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET OR
PAYOUT VALUE
OF UNEARNED
SHARES, UNITS
OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
(#)(#) (1)($) (#) (2)($) (3)(#) (4)($) (5)(#)(#) (1)($) (#) (2)($) (3)(#) (4)($) (5)
David L. Porges57,200

43.92
1/1/2017


130,512
9,879,758
76,700

44.84
1/1/2018


42,223
3,186,148
76,800

38.53
8/2/2017


40,894
3,598,672
105,800

54.79
1/1/2022


71,535
3,729,120
76,700

44.84
1/1/2018


71,418
5,406,343
92,400

58.98
1/1/2023


75,063
3,913,034
105,800

54.79
1/1/2022


74,940
5,672,958

47,600
89.78
1/1/2024


142,464
7,426,648
46,200

58.98
1/1/2023





53,900
75.70
1/1/2025





46,200
58.98
1/1/2023





47,600
89.78
1/1/2024




  
Philip P. Conti28,300

44.84
1/1/2018


39,915
3,021,566
32,400

54.79
1/1/2022


5,962
449,893
32,400

54.79
1/1/2022


5,774
508,112
31,400

58.98
1/1/2023


24,318
1,267,697
15,700

58.98
1/1/2023


24,276
1,837,693

21,100
89.78
1/1/2024


33,183
1,729,830

15,700
58.98
1/1/2023


33,129
2,507,865

20,300
75.70
1/1/2025


53,607
2,794,533

21,100
89.78
1/1/2024




  
Theresa Z. Bone5,000

44.84
1/1/2018
1,003
75,927
7,128
539,590




3,986
301,740
2,125
187,000
5,000

44.84
1/1/2018
1,004
52,360
2,194
165,559






4,002
302,951

8,700
75.70
1/1/2025
3,435
179,057
4,008
208,937






8,892
673,124






8,904
464,166






8,892
673,124






22,776
1,187,313
  
Randall L. Crawford87,000

48.91
8/5/2015


55,269
4,183,863
21,400

43.92
1/1/2017


14,496
1,093,868
21,400

43.92
1/1/2017


14,039
1,235,432
38,500

44.84
1/1/2018


34,110
1,778,154
38,500

44.84
1/1/2018


34,053
2,577,812
44,800

54.79
1/1/2022


38,721
2,018,526
44,800

54.79
1/1/2022


38,658
2,926,411
44,100

58.98
1/1/2023


62,532
3,259,793
22,050

58.98
1/1/2023





24,600
89.78
1/1/2024





22,050
58.98
1/1/2023





24,600
89.78
1/1/2024





23,700
75.70
1/1/2025





(1)The options reflected in this column are EQT options which vest according to the following schedule: of the options expiring in 2023, 100% were vested as of January 1, 2015, and of the options expiring in 2024, 100% will vest on January 1, 2017. In2017 and of the event of a change of control of EQT, theoptions expiring in 2025, 100% will vest on January 1, 2018. The vesting of option awards may accelerate. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below for a discussion of, among other things, a revised vesting schedule and circumstances under which the vesting of an award will accelerate.

(2)This column reflects Ms. Bone’s (i) unvested EQT restricted stock award (including accrued dividends) and (ii) outstanding performance awards (including accrued dividends) under the 2013 VDA.2014 VDPSU. Ms. Bone’s restricted stock award was granted on January 31, 2013 and vestsvested on January 31, 2016, contingent upon Ms. Bone’s continued employment with EQT on such date.2016. Ms. Bone’s performance awards under the 2013 VDA2014 VDPSU were confirmed by the EQT MDC Committee in the first quarter of 2014,2015, 50% of the confirmed performance awards vested and were paid out in EQT common stockcash in the first quarter of 2014,2015 and the remainder of the performance awards vest upon payment which is expected to occur in the first quarter of 2015,2016, contingent upon Ms. Bone’s continued employment with EQT on the payment date. In the event of a change of control of EQT prior to vesting, the vesting of the restricted stock award and the performance awards under the 2014 VDPSU would have accelerated. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below for a discussion of, among other things, circumstances under which the vesting of the awards would have accelerated.

(3)This column reflects the payout values at December 31, 2015 of Ms. Bone’s unvested EQT restricted stock award (including accrued dividends) and unvested performance awards under the 2014 VDPSU (including accrued dividends), determined by multiplying the number of shares or units, as applicable, shown in the previous column by $52.13, the closing price of EQT’s common stock on December 31, 2015.  The actual payout under the restricted stock award is dependent upon the EQT stock price upon vesting.


107

Table of Contents

(4)This column reflects performance units awarded but that had not yet vested at December 31, 2015 pursuant to the EQM TR Program, the 2013 VDAIncentive PSU Program, the 2014 Incentive PSU Program and the 2015 Incentive PSU Program for each of the named executive officers (including accrued dividends for the 2013 Incentive PSU Program, the 2014 Incentive PSU Program, and the 2015 Incentive PSU Program and accrued distributions for the EQM TR Program). The number of performance units under the 2013 Incentive PSU Program, the 2014 Incentive PSU Program, and the 2015 Incentive PSU Program reflects maximum award levels because, through December 31, 2015, payout was projected above the target level for each program. The number of performance units under the EQM TR Program reflects target award levels based upon EQM’s total unitholder return through December 31, 2015. Awards under the 2014 Incentive PSU Program and the 2015 Incentive PSU Program do not vest until payment following the end of the respective performance periods. Awards under the EQM TR Program and the 2013 Incentive PSU Program are expected to vest and be distributed in the first quarter of 2016, contingent upon the executive's continued employment with EQT on the payment date. In the event of a change of control of EQT prior to vesting, the vesting of the awards under the EQM TR Program, the 2013 Incentive PSU Program, the 2014 Incentive PSU Program and the 2015 Incentive PSU Program may accelerate. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below for a discussion of, among other things, circumstances under which the vesting of an award will accelerate.


100

Table of Contents

(3)This column reflects the payout values at December 31, 2014 of Ms. Bone’s unvested EQT restricted stock award (including accrued dividends) and unvested performance awards under the 2013 VDA (including accrued dividends), determined by multiplying the number of share or units, as applicable, shown in the previous column by $75.70, the closing price of EQT’s common stock on December 31, 2014.  The actual payout under each award will depend upon the EQT stock price upon vesting.

(4)
This column reflects performance units awarded but that had not yet vested at December 31, 2014 pursuant to the 2012 EPIP, the EQM TR Program, the 2013 EPIP and the 2014 EPIP for each of the named executive officers (including accrued dividends for the 2012 EPIP, the 2013 EPIP and the 2014 EPIP and accrued distributions for the EQM TR Program). For Ms. Bone, this column also reflects performance units awarded but that had not yet vested at December 31, 2014 pursuant to the 2014 VDA (including accrued dividends). The number of performance units under the 2012 EPIP, the 2013 EPIP, the 2014 EPIP and the 2014 VDA reflects maximum award levels because, through December 31, 2014, payout was projected above the target level for each program. The number of performance units under the EQM TR Program reflects target award levels because, through December 31, 2014, total EQM unitholder return was projected to exceed 10% at the end of the performance period and there is no award level above target for this program. Awards under the 2012 EPIP, the EQM TR Program, the 2013 EPIP, the 2014 EPIP and the 2014 VDA do not vest until payment following the end of the respective performance periods. In the event of a change of control of the Company, the vesting of the awards under the 2012 EPIP, the EQM TR Program, the 2013 EPIP, the 2014 EPIP and the 2014 VDA may accelerate. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below for a discussion of, among other things, circumstances under which the vesting of an award will accelerate.

(5)This column reflects the payout values at December 31, 20142015 of unearned performance units granted under the 2012 EPIP, the EQM TR Program, the 2013 EPIPIncentive PSU Program, the 2014 Incentive PSU Program and the 2014 EPIP2015 Incentive PSU Program for each of the named executive officers (including accrued dividends for the 2012 EPIP,2013 Incentive PSU Program, the 2013 EPIP2014 Incentive PSU Program and the 2014 EPIP2015 Incentive PSU Program and accrued distributions for the EQM TR Program). For Ms. Bone, this column also reflects the payout value at December 31, 2014 of unearned performance units granted under the 2014 VDA (including accrued dividends). The payout values are determined by multiplying the number of units as shown in the previous column by $75.70,$52.13, the closing price of EQT’s common stock on December 31, 20142015 (or, for the EQM TR Program, by $88.00,$75.46, the closing price of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units on December 31, 2014)2015). The actual payout values under the 2012 EPIP, the 2013 EPIP,Incentive PSU Program, the 2014 EPIPIncentive PSU Program and the 2014 VDA2015 Incentive PSU Program will depend upon, among other things, EQT’s actual performance through, and the EQT stock price at the end of, the applicable performance periods. The actual payout values under the EQM TR Program will depend upon, among other things, the Partnership’s actual performance through, and the Partnership’sEQM’s common unit price aton the end of, the program’s performance period.payment date.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table reflects the EQT stock options exercised by the named executive officers during 20142015 and the named executive officers’ EQT performance awards that vested during 2014.2015. No other equity awards of EQT, EQGP or the PartnershipEQM were exercised or vested during 2014.
2015.
 OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS
 NUMBER OF EQT SHARES ACQUIRED ON EXERCISE VALUE REALIZED ON EXERCISE NUMBER OF EQT SHARES ACQUIRED ON VESTING VALUE REALIZED ON VESTING NUMBER OF EQT SHARES ACQUIRED ON EXERCISE VALUE REALIZED ON EXERCISE NUMBER OF EQT SHARES ACQUIRED ON VESTING VALUE REALIZED ON VESTING
NAME (#) ($) (1) (#) (2) ($) (3) (#) ($) (1) (#) (2) ($) (3)
David L. Porges 109,200
 5,661,572
 103,566
 10,440,482
 134,000
 6,398,816
 110,500
 9,014,612
Philip P. Conti 
 
 38,197
 3,850,649
 28,300
 1,303,781
 33,795
 2,756,988
Theresa Z. Bone 16,500
 796,932
 13,280
 1,304,962
 
 
 13,449
 1,073,703
Randall L. Crawford 
 
 51,964
 5,238,462
 87,000
 2,254,718
 46,795
 3,817,530

(1)The value realized on exercise is calculated as the difference between the market price of the shares of EQT common stock underlying the options at exercise and the applicable exercise price of those options.

(2)This column reflects the aggregate number of performance awards (including accrued dividends) under the 2011 VEP2012 Executive Performance Incentive Plan (2012 Incentive PSU Program) for each of the named executive officers that vested in 2014.2015.  For Ms. Bone, this column also reflects the aggregate number of performance awards (including accrued dividends) under the EQT Corporation 20122013 Value Driver Award Program (2012 VDA)(2013 VDPSU) and the 2013 VDA2014 VDPSU that vested in 2014.2015. The performance awards (including accrued dividends) under the 2011 VEP2012 Incentive PSU Program vested and were distributed in EQT common stock on February 21, 2014.19, 2015. Fifty-percent of the performance awards confirmed by the EQT MDC Committee under each of the 2012 VDA2013 VDPSU (the second and final tranche) and the 2013 VDA (the first tranche) vested and were distributed in EQT common stock on February 13, 2014. 12, 2015.  Fifty-percent of the performance awards confirmed by the EQT MDC Committee under the 2014 VDPSU (the first tranche) vested and were distributed in cash on February 12, 2015.

(3)This column reflects the value realized upon the vesting of performance awards (including accrued dividends) in 20142015 under the 2011 VEP2012 Incentive PSU Program for each of the named executive officers and under the 2012 VDA2013 VDPSU and the 2013 VDA2014 VDPSU for Ms. Bone.  The value realized on vesting is calculated based on the number of performance awards that vested and the closing price of EQT common stock on the applicable vesting dates.  


101108

Table of Contents


Retirement Benefits
 
The executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner participate in employee benefit plans and arrangements sponsored by EQT.  Neither EQM nor the Partnership nor its general partnerEQM General Partner currently offers any deferred compensation program or any supplemental executive retirement plan to any of the executive officers of the Partnership’s general partner.EQM General Partner.  EQT provides full discussion of its plans and arrangements in its filings with the SEC, including its annual proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of the shareholders of EQT, which filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and on EQT’s website at www.EQT.com on the “SEC Filings” page under the “Investors Relations” tab. The corporate secretaryCorporate Secretary of our general partnerthe EQM General Partner will also provide a copy to you free of charge upon request.
 
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan

The EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan provides for certain rights upon the occurrence of a change of control, as defined in the plan. Unless an award agreement otherwise provides or the plan administrator otherwise determines at the time of grant, in the event that a change of control occurs (1) all outstanding options, unit appreciation rights and other exercise rights will become immediately and fully exercisable, (2) all restrictions, excluding performance-based restrictions, applicable to awards under the plan will lapse, and (3) all performance criteria and other conditions to payment of awards under which payments are subject to performance conditions shall be deemed to be achieved or fulfilled, measured at the actual performance level achieved as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the date of the change of control, and payment of such awards on that basis shall be made or otherwise settled at the time of the change of control, provided that if the awards constitute deferred compensation the awards shall vest on the basis described above and shall remain payable on the dates provided in the underlying award agreements.

If within three years following the date of any change of control the employment or service of a participant is terminated voluntarily or involuntarily for any reason other than for "cause", as defined in the plan, then unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, any option, unit appreciation right or other purchase right shall be exercisable for a period of 90 days following the date of such termination of employment or service but not later than the expiration date of the award.
 
EQM TR Program
 
Under the EQM TR Program, if a participant’s employment terminates for any reason, including retirement, at any time prior to the applicable vesting date, the participant’s awarded units are forfeited, except under the following circumstances:

If the participant’s employment is terminated voluntarily or involuntarily without fault on the participant’s part (including retirement) and the participant remains on the Board of Directors of EQT or the Board of Directors of EQT Midstream Services, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership,EQM General Partner following termination, then the participant’s performance awards continue to vest for so long as the participant remains on such Board; and

If a participant’s employment is otherwise terminated involuntarily and without fault (including a termination resulting from death or disability) prior to payment, the participant may receive payment for a percentage of the participant’s performance units following termination of the performance period, contingent upon achievement of the performance condition, as follows:

TERMINATION DATEAWARDED UNITS
January 1, 2014 – December 31, 201425%
January 1, 2015 and thereafter50%
 
EQT Plans and Agreements

EQT maintains and has entered into certain plans and agreements (including those described above in “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and 20142015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table”) that require EQT to provide compensation to the named executive officers, among others, in the event of a termination of employment or a change of control of EQT. EQT provides a discussion of these plans, other than the 2013 VDA and the 2014 VDAVDPSU (which are describe

102


is described above and for which Ms. Bone is the only participating named executive officer), and agreements in its filings with the SEC, including in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC. EQT’s SEC filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov

109


and on EQT’s website at www.EQT.com on the “SEC Filings” page under the “Investors Relations” tab. The corporate secretaryCorporate Secretary of our general partnerthe EQM General Partner will also provide a copy to you free of charge upon request.

Stock Options, 2012 EPIP, 2013 EPIP,Incentive PSU Program, 2014 EPIPIncentive PSU Program, 2015 Incentive PSU Program and EQM TR Program

Descriptions of the circumstances which trigger payments and benefits, the benefits that would be provided, how payment and benefit levels are determined and the material conditions and obligations applicable to the receipt of payments or benefits in the event of a termination of employment or a change of control of EQT under the EQT stock options, the 2012 EPIP, the EQM TR Program, the 2013 EPIPIncentive PSU Program, the 2014 Incentive PSU Program and the 2014 EPIP2015 Incentive PSU Program will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement.

EQT Restricted Stock Award

Under Ms. Bone’s EQT restricted stock award, if Ms. Bone’s employment iswas terminated involuntarily and without fault on her part (including termination resulting from death or disability), the unvested EQT restricted shares will vestwould have vested as follows:
TERMINATION DATEAWARDED UNITS
January 1, 2014 – December 31, 201425%
January 1, 2015 – December 31, 201550%

In the event Ms. Bone’s employment terminatesterminated for any other reason, including retirement, prior to vesting on January 31, 2016, all unvested EQT restricted shares, including accrued dividends, arewould have been forfeited.

For purposes of Ms. Bone’s EQT restricted stock award, a change of control of EQT is defined by reference to EQT’s 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan and will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement. Under the award, if a change of control of EQT occursoccurred while Ms. Bone remainsremained employed, the unvested EQT restricted shares, including accrued dividends, would have automatically vest.vested.

2013 VDA and 2014 VDAVDPSU

Under the 2013 VDA and the 2014 VDA,VDPSU, if Ms. Bone’s employment is terminated involuntarily and without fault on her part (including a termination resulting from death or disability), the unvested confirmed performance awards will vest as follows:
2013 VDA
TERMINATION DATEAWARDED UNITS
January 1, 2014 and thereafter50%

2014 VDA
TERMINATION DATEAWARDED UNITS
Prior to January 1, 20150%
January 1, 2015 and thereafter50%

In the event Ms. Bone’s employment terminates for any other reason, including retirement, all unvested performance awards are forfeited. However, if Ms. Bone’s employment is terminated voluntarily or involuntarily without fault on her part (including retirement) and Ms. Bone is then on and remains on the Board of Directors of EQT following termination, then Ms. Bone’s awarded share units continue to vest for so long as she remains on the Board of Directors.

For the 2014 VDA only,VDPSU, if Ms. Bone’s position with EQT changes to a position that is not eligible for long-term incentive awards, as determined by the EQT MDC Committee, all unvested performance awards are forfeited.

For purposes of the 2013 VDA and the 2014 VDA,VDPSU, a change of control of EQT is defined by reference to EQT’s 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan and will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement. Under the 2013 VDA and the 2014 VDA,VDPSU, if a change of control of EQT occurs while Ms. Bone remains employed, the confirmed performance awards shall vest and

103


become non-forfeitable or, if the change of control occurs prior to the EQT MDC Committee’s confirmation of the performance awards, the target performance awards shall vest and become non-forfeitable.

Other Plans and Agreements with the Named Executive Officers

Descriptions of the circumstances which trigger payments and benefits, the benefits that would be provided, how payment and benefit levels are determined and the material conditions and obligations applicable to the receipt of payments or benefits in the event of a termination of employment or a change of control of EQT under the other plans in which the named executive officers participate and the named executive officers’ agreements with EQT will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement. Ms. Bone's agreements with EQT are generally consistent with the agreements entered into with the other executive officers of EQT.


110


Payments Triggered Upon Hypothetical Termination of Employment or Change of Control on
December 31, 20142015

The estimated payouts and benefits that would be payable upon a termination of employment or a change of control of EQT at December 31, 20142015 for the named executive officers (other than Ms. Bone) will be set forth in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement. The estimated payouts and benefits that would be payable to Ms. Bone upon her termination of employment or a change of control of EQT at December 31, 20142015 are set forth in the table below.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control of EQM on December 31, 2015, the following would be paid under the EQM TR Program to each of the named executive officers: $3,186,148 for Mr. Porges; $449,893 for Mr. Conti; $165,559 for Ms. Bone and $1,093,868 for Mr. Crawford.

The assumptions made by EQT and the descriptions of payouts under the EQM TR Program and all EQT plans and agreements other than Ms. Bone’s restricted stock award and the performance awardsaward under the 2013 VDA and 2014 VDAVDPSU will be described in EQT’s 20152016 Proxy Statement.

For the 2013 VDA,2014 VDPSU, Ms. Bone’s performance awards were confirmed by the EQT MDC Committee in the first quarter of 20142015 and the payout was based on her actual confirmed payout multiple of 3.0X.

2.31X. For purposes of the analysis below, EQM has assumed that Ms. Bone’s performance awards underBone is not then on and will not remain on the 2014 VDA were not confirmed by the EQT MDC Committee until the first quarterBoard of 2015.  Therefore, no confirmed performance awards were outstanding at December 31, 2014.  Accordingly, Ms. Bone’s payout under the 2014 VDA following a change of controlDirectors of EQT was based on her target performance award.following termination of employment.

Theresa Z. Bone
Potential Payments Upon a Termination Other thanof Employment or Following a Change of Control
EXECUTIVE BENEFITS
AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION
TERMINATION BY COMPANY WITHOUT CAUSE
($)
TERMINATION BY COMPANY FOR CAUSE
($)
TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE FOR GOOD REASON
($)
TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE WITHOUT GOOD REASON
($)
DEATH
($)
DISABILITY
($)
Compensation:      
Cash Payment of Base Salary285,000
0285,000
0
0
0
Cash Payment of Short-Term Incentives275,000
0275,000
275,000
275,000
275,000
Long-Term Incentives:      
EQT Restricted Stock Award18,982
00
0
18,982
18,982
2012 EPIP (1)
228,427
00
0
228,427
228,427
EQM TR Program (1)
46,750
00
0
46,750
46,750
2013 EPIP (1)
60,590
00
0
60,590
60,590
2013 VDA (1)
150,870
00
0
150,870
150,870
2014 EPIP (2)
0
00
0
0
0
2014 VDA (2)
0
00
0
0
0
Executive Alternative Work Arrangement Compensation142,302
00
40,222
0
0
Other Benefits and Perquisites:      
Company Severance Benefit152,500
00
0
0
0
Qualified Retirement Contribution0
00
0
0
0
Post-Termination Health Care / Insurance20,927
013,951
0
0
0
Life Insurance Proceeds0
00
0
285,000
0
Outplacement or Cash Payment20,000
020,000
0
0
0
Total1,401,348
0593,951
315,222
1,065,619
780,619

104



(1)Reflects the estimated payout under the applicable long-term incentive program based upon the terms of the program and actual performance through December 31, 2014.
(2)Under the 2014 EPIP and the 2014 VDA, no payments are made in the case of termination prior to January 1, 2015.

Potential Payments Following a Change of Control

Upon the occurrence of a change of control of EQT atemployment on December 31, 2014 (or with respect to the EQM TR Program only, a change of control of the Partnership), $75,927 would be paid under the EQT restricted stock award, $456,853 would be paid under the 2012 EPIP, $187,000 would be paid under the EQM TR Program, $242,361 would be paid under the 2013 EPIP, $301,740 would be paid under the 2013 VDA, $448,750 would be paid under the 2014 EPIP, $224,375 would be paid under the 2014 VDA and $275,000 would be paid under the Executive STIP for the 2014 plan year. In addition, if her employment were to terminate following the change of control,2015, Ms. Bone would also be entitled to the following payments:
EXECUTIVE BENEFITS
AND PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION
TERMINATION BY COMPANY WITHOUT CAUSE
($)
TERMINATION BY COMPANY FOR CAUSE
($)
TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE FOR GOOD REASON
($)
TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE WITHOUT GOOD REASON
($)
DEATH
($)
DISABILITY
($)
TERMINATION BY EQT WITHOUT CAUSE
($)
TERMINATION BY EQT FOR CAUSE
($)
TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE FOR GOOD REASON
($)
TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE WITHOUT GOOD REASON
($)
DEATH
($)
DISABILITY
($)
Compensation:       
Cash Payment of Base Salary570,000
0570,000
0
0
0600,000
0600,000
0
0
0
Cash Payment of Short-Term Incentives640,000
0640,000
0
0
0546,666
0546,666
255,000
255,000
255,000
Executive Alternative Work Arrangement Compensation142,302
00
40,222
0
0281,890
00
281,890
0
0
Other Benefits and Perquisites:       
Company Severance Benefit0
00
0
0
0
EQT Severance Benefit162,558
00
0
0
0
Qualified Retirement Contribution46,800
046,800
0
0
00
00
0
0
0
Post-Termination Health Care / Insurance27,902
027,902
0
0
07,125
00
0
0
0
Life Insurance Proceeds0
00
0
285,000
00
00
0
300,000
0
Cash Payment15,251
015,251
0
0
0
Outplacement or Cash Payment20,000
020,000
0
0
0200,000
0200,000
0
0
0
Claw Back0
00
0
0
0
Total Payments Upon Termination1,447,004
01,304,702
40,222
285,000
0
Total (excluding long-term incentive)1,813,490
01,361,917
536,890
555,000
255,000
In addition, under outstanding long-term incentive programs (and including the intrinsic value of outstanding options), Ms. Bone would be entitled to cash and stock payments with an aggregate value of $1,863,269 upon a termination of employment by the Company without cause or upon termination by her for good reason, $36,450 upon termination by her without good reason, and $401,667 upon her death or disability, assuming, in each case, actual performance through the end of the applicable performance period is consistent with performance through December 31, 2015.  Under those same programs (and again including the intrinsic value of outstanding options), Ms. Bone would be entitled to $1,863,269 upon the occurrence of a change of control on December 31, 2015, assuming, in the case of the 2015 Incentive PSU Program, that the acquiring company causes such program to be paid upon closing rather than assumed or equitably converted in the transaction.  If such amounts are, in fact, paid upon the occurrence of a change of control, Ms. Bone would not be entitled to a duplicate payment upon a subsequent termination of employment for any reason.        

111



Compensation of Directors

Officers or employees of EQT or its affiliates who also serve as directors of EQT Midstream Services, LLC, the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner do not receive additional compensation for their service as directors. During 2014,2015, directors of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner who are not also officers or employees of EQT or its affiliates received cash compensation on a quarterly basis as a retainer and for attending meetings of the board of directorsBoard and committee meetings as follows:

An annual cash retainer of $40,000 (which increased to $47,000 in 2015).$47,000.
A cash meeting fee of $1,500 for each boardBoard and committee meeting attended in person. If a director participates in a meeting by telephone, the meeting fee is $750.
For the audit committee chairAudit Committee Chair and the conflicts committee chair,Conflicts Committee Chair, an annual committee chair retainer of $15,000 (which decreased to $10,000 in 2015).$10,000.

In addition, each non-employee director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings. The PartnershipEQM also provides non-employee directors with $20,000 of life insurance and $250,000 of travel accident insurance while traveling on business for the Partnership.EQM. To further the Partnership’sEQM’s support for charitable giving, all directors are eligible to participate in the Matching Gifts Program of the EQT Foundation on the same terms as EQT employees and directors. Under this program, the EQT Foundation will match gifts of at least $100 made by a director to eligible charities, up to an aggregate total of $25,000$50,000 in any calendar year.

On an annual basis, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner grants to each non-employee director phantom units as a vehicle to deliver compensation for their annual service on the Board. On January 1, 2014,2015, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner granted to each non-employee director phantom units with a value of $50,000$65,000 under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (with the number of phantom units (860)(740) determined by dividing the award value by the closing price of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units on December 31, 20132014 ($58.79)88.00) and rounding up to the next ten units). The phantom units were fully vested as of the grant date,

105


with distribution equivalents accruing on such units. The phantom units (and the accrued distribution equivalents) will be converted into common units on the date that the grantee ceases to be a director. For 2015, the value of the annual phantom unit award increased to $65,000.

The table below shows the total 20142015 compensation of the Partnership’sEQM’s non-employee directors:
NAME 
FEES
EARNED
OR PAID
IN CASH
($) (1)
 
STOCK
AWARDS
($) (2)
 
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION
($) (3)
 
TOTAL
($)
 
FEES EARNED OR PAID IN CASH
($) (1)
 
STOCK
AWARDS
($) (2)
 
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION
($) (3)
 
TOTAL
($)
Michael A. Bryson 78,250
 50,559
 25,055
 153,864
 78,750
 65,120
 26,058
 169,928
Julian M. Bott 78,250
 50,559
 1,055
 129,864
 75,000
 65,120
 658
 140,778
Lara E. Washington 61,750
 50,559
 11,555
 123,864
 68,750
 65,120
 11,808
 145,678
 
(1)Includes annual cash retainer, meeting fees and committee chair fees.

(2)This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair values determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the phantom units awarded to each director during 2014.2015. On January 1, 2014,2015, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner granted 860740 phantom units to each non-employee director who was a member of the boardBoard of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner at the time of grant. The grant date fair value is computed as the sum of the number of phantom units awarded on the grant date multiplied by the closing price of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units on the business day prior to the grant, which closing price was $58.79$88.00 on December 31, 2013.2014.

(3)This column reflects (i) annual premiums of $55.47$57.63 per director paid for life insurance and travel accident insurance policies and (ii) the following matching gifts made to qualifying organizations under the EQT Foundation’s Matching Gifts Program: Mr. Bryson - $25,000;$26,000; Mr. Bott - $1,000;$600; and Ms. Washington - $11,500.$11,750. The non-employee directors may use a de minimis number of tickets purchased by EQT to attend sporting or other events when such tickets are not otherwise being used for business purposes. The use of such tickets does not result in any incremental costs to the Partnership.EQM.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As previously discussed, the Board is not required to maintain, and does not maintain, a compensation committee. Each of Messrs. Porges, Conti and Crawford, who are directors of the EQM General Partner, are also executive officers of EQT. However, all compensation decisions with respect to each of these executive officers are made by the Management and Development Committee of the Board of Directors of EQT and none of these individuals receives any compensation directly from EQM or the EQM General Partner for their service as a director.

112



Item 12.                         Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
 
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units and EQGP’s common units owned as of January 30, 2015,February 1, 2016, by:

each of the directors of the Partnership’s general partner;EQM General Partner;
each of the named executive officers of the Partnership’s general partner;EQM General Partner; and
all directors and executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner as a group.

The amounts and percentages of units beneficially owned are reported on the basis of SEC regulations governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if that person has or shares "voting power," which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or "investment power," which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. Except as indicated by footnote, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all units shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable, and none of the units are subject to a pledge.

Percentage of total units beneficially owned is based on 43,347,45277,520,181 EQM common units and 17,339,718 subordinated266,165,000 EQGP common units outstanding as of January 30, 2015.February 1, 2016.


106


NAME OF BENEFICIAL  OWNER(1) 
COMMON
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED (2)
PERCENTAGE
OF
COMMON
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
SUBORDINATED
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
PERCENTAGE
OF
SUBORDINATED
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
PERCENTAGE
OF
TOTAL
COMMON
AND
SUBORDINATED
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
David L. Porges20,000
***
Philip P. Conti9,750
***
Randall L. Crawford25,000
***
Lewis B. Gardner6,500
***
Theresa Z. Bone10,000
***
Julian M. Bott7,585
***
Michael A. Bryson (3)9,035
***
Lara E. Washington2,809
***
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 individuals)90,679
***
NAME OF BENEFICIAL  OWNER (1)  
EQM COMMON
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED (2) (3)
 
PERCENTAGE
OF EQM
COMMON
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
 EQGP COMMON UNITS BENEFICIALLY OWNED (2) 
PERCENTAGE
OF EQGP
COMMON
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
David L. Porges 20,000
 * 56,263 *
Philip P. Conti 9,750
 * 28,503 *
Randall L. Crawford 25,000
 * 100,000 *
Lewis B. Gardner 6,063
 * 28,503 *
Theresa Z. Bone 10,000
 * 19,986 *
Julian M. Bott 8,636
 *  *
Michael A. Bryson (4) 10,636
 *  *
Lara E. Washington 3,771
 *  *
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 individuals) 93,856
 * 233,255 *
 * Less than 1%.
 
(1)Unless otherwise indicated, the address for all beneficial owners in this table is c/o EQT Midstream Partners, LP, 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

(2)This column reflects the number of common units held of record or owned through a bank, broker or other nominee.

(3)For Messrs. Bott and Bryson and Ms. Washington, itthis column includes phantom units, including accrued distributions, to be settled in EQM common units, in the following amounts;amounts: Mr. Bott - 5,5856,636 units; Mr. Bryson - 5,5856,636 units; and Ms. Washington - 2,8093,771 units.

(3)(4)CommonEQM common units beneficially owned include 1,0002,000 common units that are held in Mrs. Bryson's revocable trust.


113



The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of each person known by the PartnershipEQM to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of theEQM’s outstanding units of the Partnership:common units:
NAME OF BENEFICIAL
OWNER
 
COMMON
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
 
PERCENTAGE
OF
COMMON
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
 
SUBORDINATED
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
 
PERCENTAGE
OF
SUBORDINATED
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
 
PERCENTAGE
OF
TOTAL
COMMON
AND
SUBORDINATED
UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED
 COMMON UNITS BENEFICIALLY OWNED PERCENTAGE OF COMMON UNITS BENEFICIALLY OWNED
EQT Corporation(1) 3,959,952
 9.1% 17,339,718
 100% 35.1%
EQT Corporation(1)
 21,811,643
 28.1%
625 Liberty Avenue  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Pittsburgh, PA 15222  
  
  
  
  
  
  
          
Goldman Sachs Asset Management Group, L.P. (2) 3,904,280
 9.0% 
 
 
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C.(2)
 7,793,194
 10.1%
11550 Ash Street, Suite 300  
  
Leawood, KS 66211  
  
Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. (3)
 5,807,885
 7.5%
200 West Street  
  
  
  
  
  
  
New York, NY 10282  
  
  
  
  
  
  
          
Tortoise Capital Advisors, LLC(3) 3,807,391
 8.8% 
 
 
11550 Ash Street, Suite 300  
  
  
  
  
Leawood, KS 66211  
  
  
  
  
          
Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.(4) 3,602,021
 8.31% 
 
 
Two World Financial Center  
  
  
  
  
New York, NY 10281  
  
  
  
  
ALPS Advisors, Inc. (4)
 4,287,352
 5.53%
1290 Broadway, Suite 1100    
Denver, CO 80203    

107



(1)EQGP held 21,811,643 EQM common units as of February 1, 2016. EQT Corporation is the ultimate parent company of EQT Gathering, LLC, which is the sole owner of all of the membership interests of the Partnership’s general partner, which is the sole owner of the Partnership’s general partner units. EQT Gathering, LLC is also the sole owner of EQT Midstream Investments, LLC, which is the sole owner of 3,959,952 common unitsEQGP and 17,339,718 subordinated units. EQT may, therefore, be deemed to beneficially own the units held by EQT Gathering, LLC.EQGP.

(2)Information based on a SEC Schedule 13G filed on February 12, 2015January 8, 2016 reporting that Goldman Sachs Asset Management Group, L.P.Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C. has sharedsole voting and dispositive power over 3,904,280115,848 common units, shared voting power over 7,044,356 common units and shared dispositive power over 7,677,346 common units.

(3)Information based on a SEC Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2015,9, 2016 reporting that Tortoise Capital Advisors, LLCGoldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. has shared voting power over 3,592,831 units and shared dispositive power over 3,807,3915,807,885 common units.

(4)Information based on a SEC Schedule 13G filed on February 5, 2015,3, 2016 reporting that Oppenheimer Funds,ALPS Advisors, Inc. has shared voting and dispositive power over 3,602,0214,287,352 common units, of which 4,268,459 common units are attributable to Alerian MLP ETF, an investment company to which ALPS Advisors, Inc. furnishes investment advice. Alerian MLP ETF has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to the 4,268,459 common units.

The following table sets forth, as of January 30, 2015,February 1, 2016, the number of shares of common stock of EQT Corporation owned by each of the named executive officers and directors of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and all directors and executive officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner as a group. 
Name 
Exercisable
Stock Options (1)
 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned (2)
 
Percent of
Class (3)
 
Exercisable
Stock Options (1)
 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned (2)
 
Percent of
Class (3)
David L. Porges (4)
 408,900 542,057 * 274,900 529,517 *
Philip P. Conti(5) 92,100 113,642 * 63,800 113,648 *
Randall L. Crawford 235,800 63,837 * 148,800 64,210 *
Lewis B. Gardner 26,900 19,962 * 13,200 23,591 *
Theresa Z. Bone 5,000 44,531 * 5,000 24,636 *
Julian M. Bott      
Michael A. Bryson      
Lara E. Washington      
Directors and executive officers as a group (8 individuals) 768,700 784,029 1.0% 505,700 755,602 *
 *          Less than 1%.
 
(1)This column reflects the number of shares of EQT Corporation common stock that the executive officers and directors of the Partnership’s general partner had a right to acquire within 60 days after January 30, 2015February 1, 2016 through the exercise of stock options.


114


(2)This column reflects shares held of record and shares owned through a bank, broker or other nominee, including, for executive officers, (i) shares owned through EQT Corporation’s 401(k) plan and (ii) unvested restrictedemployees, shares owned through EQT’s long-term incentive plan over which the executive officers have sole voting but no investment power.401(k) plan.

(3)This column reflects for each of the executive officers and directors, as well as all executive officers and directors as a group, (i) the sum of the shares beneficially owned and the stock options exercisable by the executive officers and director group within 60 days of January 30, 2015,February 1, 2016, as a percentage of (ii) the sum of EQT Corporation’sEQT’s outstanding shares at January 30, 2015,February 1, 2016, and all options exercisable within 60 days of January 30, 2015.February 1, 2016.

(4)Shares beneficially owned include 50,000 shares that are held in a trust of which Mr. Porges is a co-trustee and in which he shares voting and investment power.

(5)Shares beneficially owned include 5,000 shares that are held in the Conti Family Foundation in which Mr. Conti has sole voting and investment power.

108


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information as of December 31, 20142015 with respect to the Partnership’sEQM’s common units that may be issued under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which did not require approval by the Partnership’sEQM’s unitholders.
PLAN CATEGORY 
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES TO
BE
ISSUED UPON
EXERCISE OF
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS,
WARRANTS
AND RIGHTS
 
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE OF
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND
RIGHTS
 
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
REMAINING
AVAILABLE FOR
FUTURE ISSUANCE
UNDER
EQUITY
COMPENSATION
PLANS (EXCLUDING
SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN
COLUMN A)
 
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES TO
BE
ISSUED UPON
EXERCISE OF
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS,
WARRANTS
AND RIGHTS
 
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE OF
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND
RIGHTS
 
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
REMAINING
AVAILABLE FOR
FUTURE ISSUANCE
UNDER
EQUITY
COMPENSATION
PLANS (EXCLUDING
SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN
COLUMN A)
 (A) (B) (C) (A) (B) (C)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Unitholders 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Unitholders(1) 256,269
 N/A  
 1,487,460
 227,283
 N/A  
 1,545,433
Total 256,269
 N/A  
 1,487,460
 227,283
 N/A  
 1,545,433

(1)The board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard adopted the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan in connection with the IPO of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units.
 
EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner adopted the EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan for employees and non-employee directors of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and any of its affiliates. The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner may issue long-term equity based awards under the plan. The PartnershipEQM is responsible for the cost of awards granted under the plan. Employees and non-employee directors of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner or any affiliate, including subsidiaries, are eligible to receive awards under the plan.

The aggregate number of units that may be issued under the plan is 2,000,000 units, subject to proportionate adjustment in the event of unit splits and similar events. Units underlying options and unit appreciation rights will count as one unit, and units underlying all other unit-based awards will count as two units, against the number of units available for issuance under the plan. Units subject to awards that terminate or expire unexercised, or are cancelled,canceled, forfeited or lapse for any reason, and units underlying awards that are ultimately settled in cash, will again become available for future grants of awards under the plan. Units delivered by the participant or withheld from an award to satisfy tax withholding requirements, and units delivered or withheld to pay the exercise price of an option, will not be used to replenish the plan unit reserve.

The plan is administered by the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard or such other committee of the boardBoard as may be designated by the boardBoard to administer the plan.

The plan authorizes the granting of awards in any of the following forms: phantom units, performance awards, restricted units, distribution equivalent rights, market-priced options to purchase units, unit appreciation rights, other unit-based awards that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on units, and cash-based awards.

The board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard may amend, suspend or terminate the plan at any time, except that no amendment may be made without the approval of the Partnership’sEQM’s unitholders if unitholder approval is required by any federal or state law or regulation or by the rules of any

115


exchange on which the units may then be listed, or if the amendment, alteration or other change materially increases the benefits accruing to participants, increases the number of units available under the plan or modifies the requirements for participation under the plan, or if the Board in its discretion determines that obtaining such unitholder approval is for any reason advisable.

Common units to be delivered pursuant to awards under the plan may be common units acquired by the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in the open market, from any other person, directly from the PartnershipEQM or any combination of the foregoing. When the PartnershipEQM issues new common units upon the grant, vesting or payment of awards under the plan, the total number of common units outstanding increases.

109



Item 13.                         Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

As of January 30, 2015, EQT indirectlyFebruary 1, 2016, EQGP owned 3,959,95221,811,643 common units representing a 27.6% limited partner interest in EQM, and, 17,339,718 subordinatedthrough its ownership of the EQM General Partner, EQGP indirectly held 1,443,015 general partner units, representing 35.1% of the limited partner interests in the Partnership. In addition, the Partnership’s general partner, which is a subsidiary of EQT, owned a 2.0%1.8% general partner interest in the PartnershipEQM, and 100% of the incentive distribution rights. EQT is the ultimate parent company of EQGP and may, therefore, be deemed to beneficially own the units held by EQGP.

Distributions and Payments to the Partnership’sEQM General Partner and Its Affiliates

The following information summarizes the distributions and payments made or to be made by the PartnershipEQM to the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and its affiliates, including EQGP, in connection with the Partnership’s formation,EQM’s ongoing operation and any liquidation. These distributions and payments were determined before EQM’s IPO by and among affiliated entities and, consequently, are not the result of arm's-length negotiations.

Formation Stage

The aggregate consideration received by the Partnership’s general partner and its affiliates for the contribution of certain assets and liabilities to the Partnership in connection with the IPO:

2,964,718 common units
17,339,718 subordinated units
707,744 general partner units representing a 2.0% general partner interest;
all of the incentive distribution rights; and
a cash payment of approximately $231 million from the proceeds of the IPO.

Operational Stage

            Distributions of available cash to the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and its affiliates.affiliates.  Unless distributions exceed the minimum quarterly distribution, the PartnershipEQM makes cash distributions 98.0%98.2% to the Partnership’sEQM’s unitholders pro rata, including EQGP as the Partnership’s general partner and its affiliates as holdersholder of an aggregate of 3,959,95221,811,643 common units, and all of the subordinated units, and 2.0%1.8% to the Partnership’s general partner.EQM General Partner. In addition, if distributions exceed the minimum quarterly distribution and other higher target levels, the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner, by virtue of its incentive distribution rights, is entitled to increasing percentages of the distributions, up to 48.0% of the distributions above the highest target level.

            Payments to the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and its affiliates.affiliates. The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner does not receive a management fee or other compensation for managing the Partnership.EQM. The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and its affiliates are reimbursed, however, for all direct and indirect expenses incurred on the Partnership’sEQM’s behalf. The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner determines the amount of these expenses. In addition, the PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT and its affiliates for the payment of certain operating expenses and for the provision of various general and administrative services for the Partnership’sEQM’s benefit.

            Withdrawal or removal of the Partnership’s general partner.EQM General Partner.  If the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner withdraws or is removed, its general partner interest and its incentive distribution rights will either be sold to the new general partner for cash or converted into common units, in each case for an amount equal to the fair market value of those interests.

Liquidation Stage

            Upon the Partnership’sEQM’s liquidation, the partners, including the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner, will be entitled to receive liquidating distributions according to their capital account balances.

Agreements with EQT

            The PartnershipEQM and its affiliates have entered into various agreements with EQT and its affiliates other than the Partnership,EQM, as described in detail below. These agreements were negotiated in connection with, among other things, the formation of the Partnership,EQM, the IPO and the Partnership’sEQM’s acquisitions from EQT. These agreements address, among other things, the acquisition of assets and the assumption of liabilities by the PartnershipEQM and its subsidiaries. These agreements were not the result of arm’s length negotiations and, as such, they or underlying transactions may not be based on terms as favorable as those that could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.


110116



Omnibus Agreement

            The PartnershipEQM and its general partnerthe EQM General Partner have entered into an omnibus agreement with EQT, thatwhich governs the Partnership’sEQM’s relationship with EQT regarding the following matters:
the Partnership’s
EQM’s obligation to reimburse EQT and its affiliates for certain direct operating expenses they paypaid on the Partnership’s behalf (the “direct operating expenses”);EQM’s behalf;
the Partnership’sEQM’s obligation to reimburse EQT and its affiliates for providing the PartnershipEQM corporate, general and administrative services (the “general and administrative expenses”);
the Partnership’sEQM’s obligation to reimburse EQT and its affiliates for operation and management services pursuant to the operation and management services agreement with EQT, as described below under "-Operation"Operation and Management Services Agreement" (the “operation and management expenses”);
EQT's obligation to indemnify or reimburse the PartnershipEQM for losses or expenses relating to or arising from, among other things, (i) certain plugging and abandonment obligations; (ii) certain bare steel replacement capital expenditures; (iii) certain pipeline safety costs; (iv) certain preclosing environmental liabilities; (v) certain title and rights-of-way matters; (vi) the Partnership’s failure to have certain necessary governmental consents and permits; (vii) certain tax liabilities attributable to periods prior to the IPO; (viii)(v) assets previously owned by Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) and retained by EQT and its affiliates, including the Sunrise Pipeline; (ix)(vi) any claims related to Equitrans' previous ownership of the Big Sandy Pipeline; and (x)(vii) any amounts owed to the PartnershipEQM by a third party that has exercised a contractual right of offset against amounts owed by EQT to such third party;
the Partnership’sEQM’s obligation to indemnify EQT for losses attributable to (i) the ownership or operation of the Partnership’sEQM’s assets after the closing of the IPO, except to the extent EQT is obligated to indemnify the PartnershipEQM for such losses pursuant to the operation and management services agreement; and (ii) any amounts owed to EQT by a third party that has exercised a contractual right of offset against amounts owed by the PartnershipEQM to such third party; and
the Partnership’sEQM’s use of the name "EQT" and related marks.

On March 17, 2015, EQT, EQM and the EQM General Partner amended the omnibus agreement, effective as of January 1, 2015, to remove any restriction on reimbursement by EQM for any direct and indirect costs and expenses attributable to EQT’s long-term incentive programs. Such amendment was approved by the Conflicts Committee of the EQM General Partner.

Reimbursement of Expenses
            
Under the omnibus agreement, EQT performs, or causes its affiliates to perform, centralized corporate, general and administrative services for the Partnership,EQM, such as: legal, corporate recordkeeping, planning, budgeting, regulatory, accounting, billing, business development, treasury, insurance administration and claims processing, risk management, health, safety and environmental, information technology, human resources, investor relations, cash management and banking, payroll, internal audit, taxes and engineering. In exchange, the PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT and its affiliates for the expenses incurred by them in providing these services, except for any expenses associated with EQT's long-term incentive programs.services. The omnibus agreement further provides that the PartnershipEQM reimburse EQT and its affiliates for the Partnership’sEQM’s allocable portion of the premiums on any insurance policies covering the Partnership’sEQM’s assets.

The PartnershipEQM is required to reimburse EQT for any additional state income, franchise or similar tax paid by EQT resulting from the inclusion of the PartnershipEQM (and its subsidiaries) in a combined state income, franchise or similar tax report with EQT as required by applicable law. The amount of any such reimbursement is limited to the tax that the PartnershipEQM (and its subsidiaries) would have paid had they not been included in a combined group with EQT.

The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of expenses described above for which the PartnershipEQM was obligated to reimburse EQT pursuant to the omnibus agreement for the yearyears ended December 31, 2014. 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Years Ended December 31,
2015 2014 2013
(Thousands)
DESCRIPTION OF EXPENSES
EXPENSE 
(MILLIONS)
   
  
Reimbursement of operation and management expenses$22.0
$31,310
 $21,999
 $14,296
Reimbursement of general and administrative expenses$25.1
$46,149
 $25,051
 $18,322
  
The expenses for which the PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT and its subsidiaries may not necessarily reflect the actual expenses that the PartnershipEQM would incur on a stand-alone basis and the PartnershipEQM is unable to estimate what those expenses would be on a stand-alone basis.

Indemnification

    EQT's indemnification obligations to the Partnership include the following:

111117


Indemnification

EQT's indemnification obligations to EQM include the following:

Plugging and abandonment liabilities.  For a period of ten years after the closing of the IPO, which occurred on July 2, 2012, EQT is required to reimburse the PartnershipEQM for plugging and abandonment expenditures and other expenditures for certain identified wells of EQT and third parties. The reimbursement obligation of EQT with respect to wells owned by third parties is capped at $1.2 million per year.
Bare steel replacement.  EQT is required to reimburse the PartnershipEQM for bare steel replacement capital expenditures in the event that ongoing maintenance capital expenditures (other than capital expenditures associated with plugging and abandonment liabilities to be reimbursed by EQT) exceed $17.2 million (with respect to the Partnership’sEQM’s assets at the time of the IPO) in any year. If such ongoing maintenance capital expenditures and bare steel replacement capital expenditures exceed $17.2 million during a year, EQT is required to reimburse the PartnershipEQM for the lesser of (i) the amount of bare steel replacement capital expenditures during such year and (ii) the amount by which such ongoing capital expenditures and bare steel replacement capital expenditures exceeds $17.2 million. This bare steel replacement reimbursement obligation is capped at an aggregate amount of $31.5 million over the ten years following the IPO.
Pipeline Safety Cost Tracker Reimbursement.  For a period of five years after the closing of the IPO, EQT is required to reimburse the PartnershipEQM for the amount by which the qualifying pipeline safety costs included in the annual pipeline safety cost tracker filings made by Equitrans with the FERC exceed the qualifying pipeline safety costs actually recovered each year.
Environmental.  For a period of three years after the closing of the IPO, EQT is required to indemnify the Partnership for certain potential environmental and toxic tort claims, losses and expenses associated with the operation of the assets acquired by the Partnership and its affiliates and occurring before the closing date of the IPO. The maximum liability of EQT for these indemnification obligations is capped at $15 million and EQT will not have any obligation under these indemnification obligations until the Partnership’s aggregate losses exceed $250,000, after which EQT shall be liable for the full amount of such claims in excess of $250,000. EQT has no indemnification obligations with respect to environmental or toxic tort claims made as a result of additions to, or modifications of, environmental laws promulgated after the closing of the IPO.
Title.  For a period of three years after the closing of the IPO, EQT is required to indemnify the Partnership for losses relating to the Partnership’s failure to have valid and indefeasible easement rights, rights-of-way, leasehold and/or fee ownership interests in and to the lands on which the Partnership’s assets are located, and such failure prevents the Partnership from using or operating its assets in substantially the same manner that such assets were used and operated immediately prior to the closing of the IPO.
Governmental consents and permits.  For a period of three years after the closing of the IPO, EQT is required to indemnify the Partnership for losses relating to its failure to have any consent or governmental permit where such failure prevents the Partnership from using or operating its assets in substantially the same manner that such assets were used and operated immediately prior to the closing of the IPO.
Taxes.  Until 60 days after the expiration of any applicable statute of limitations, EQT will indemnify the PartnershipEQM for any income taxes attributable to operations or ownership of the assets prior to the closing of the IPO, including any such income tax liability of EQT and its affiliates that may result from the Partnership’sEQM’s formation transactions.
Retained liabilities.  EQT is required to indemnify the PartnershipEQM for any liabilities, claims or losses relating to or arising from assets owned or previously owned by the PartnershipEQM and retained by EQT and its affiliates following the closing of the IPO.
Big Sandy Pipeline.  EQT is required to indemnify the PartnershipEQM for any claims related to Equitrans' previous ownership of the Big Sandy Pipeline, which was sold to a third party, including claims arising under the Big Sandy Purchase Agreement.
Contractual Offsets.  EQT is required to indemnify the PartnershipEQM for any amounts owed to the PartnershipEQM by a third party that has exercised a contractual right of offset against amounts owed by EQT to such third party.

In no event is EQT obligated to indemnify the PartnershipEQM for any claims, losses or expenses or income taxes referred to in the first sevenfour bullets above to the extent either (i) reserved for in the Partnership’sEQM’s financial statements as of December 31, 2011, or (ii) the PartnershipEQM recovers any such amounts under available insurance coverage, from contractual rights or other recoveries against any third party or in the tariffs paid by the customers of the Partnership’sEQM’s affected pipeline system.

            The PartnershipEQM indemnifies EQT for all losses attributable to (i) the post-closing operations of the assets owned by the Partnership,EQM, to the extent not subject to EQT's indemnification obligations; and (ii) any amounts owed to EQT by a third party that has exercised a contractual right of offset against amounts owed by the PartnershipEQM to such third party.


112


The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of obligations described above for which EQT was obligated to indemnify and/or reimburse the PartnershipEQM pursuant to the omnibus agreement for the yearyears ended December 31, 2014.2015, 2014 and 2013.

Years Ended December 31,
2015 2014 2013
(Thousands)
DESCRIPTION OF OBLIGATION
AMOUNT OF OBLIGATION
(MILLIONS)
   
  
Plugging and abandonment liabilities$0.5
$26
 $500
 $566
Bare steel replacement$
6,268
 
 2,566
Other capital reimbursements$1,198
 $
 $


118


Competition

            Under the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement, EQT and its affiliates, including EQGP, are expressly permitted to compete with the Partnership.EQM. EQT and any of its affiliates may acquire, construct or dispose of additional transportation and storage or other assets in the future without any obligation to offer the PartnershipEQM the opportunity to purchase or construct those assets.

Amendment and Termination

            The omnibus agreement can be amended by written agreement of all parties to the agreement. However, the PartnershipEQM may not agree to any amendment or modification that would, in the determination of the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner, be adverse in any material respect to the holders of the Partnership’sEQM’s common units without the prior approval of the conflicts committee.Conflicts Committee. In the event of (i) a "change in control" (as defined in the omnibus agreement) of EQM, the Partnership, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner or EQT or (ii) the removal of EQT Midstream Services, LLC as the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in circumstances where (a) "cause" (as defined in the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement) does not exist and the common units held by the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and its affiliates were not voted in favor of such removal or (b) cause exists, the omnibus agreement (other than the indemnification and reimbursement provisions therein) will be terminable by EQT, and the PartnershipEQM will have a 90-day transition period to cease the Partnership’sEQM’s use of the name "EQT" and related marks.

Operation and Management Services Agreement

            Upon the closing of the IPO, the PartnershipEQM entered into an operation and management services agreement with EQT Gathering, LLC (EQT Gathering), an indirect wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of EQT, under which EQT Gathering provides the Partnership’sEQM’s pipelines and storage facilities with certain operational and management services, such as operation and maintenance of flow and pressure control, maintenance and repair of the Partnership’s pipelineEQM’s pipelines and storage facilities, conducting routine operational activities, managing transportation and logistics, contract administration, gas control and measurement, engineering support and such other services as the PartnershipEQM and EQT Gathering may mutually agree upon from time to time. The PartnershipEQM reimburses EQT Gathering for such services pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement.

            The operation and management services agreement will terminate upon the termination of the omnibus agreement. If a force majeure event prevents a party from carrying out its obligations (other than to make payments due), such party's obligations under the agreement, to the extent affected by force majeure, will be suspended during the continuation of the force majeure event. These force majeure events include acts of God, strikes, lockouts or other industrial disturbances, wars, riots, fires, floods, storms, explosions, terrorist acts, breakage or accident to machinery or lines of pipe and inability to obtain or unavoidable delays in obtaining material, equipment or supplies and similar events or circumstances, so long as such events or circumstances are beyond the reasonable control of the party claiming force majeure and could not have been prevented or overcome by such party's reasonable diligence.

            Under the agreement, EQT Gathering is required to indemnify the PartnershipEQM from claims, losses or liabilities incurred by the Partnership,EQM, including third party claims, arising out of EQT Gathering's gross negligence or willful misconduct. The PartnershipEQM is required to indemnify EQT Gathering from any claims, losses or liabilities incurred by EQT Gathering, including any third-partythird party claims, arising from the performance of the agreement, but not to the extent of losses or liabilities caused by EQT Gathering's gross negligence or willful misconduct. Neither party is liable for any consequential, incidental or punitive damages under the agreement, except to the extent such damages are included in a third party claim for which a party is obligated to indemnify the other party pursuant to the agreement. Neither party may assign its rights or obligations under the agreement without the prior written consent of the other party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.



113


Equitable Gas Transaction

On December 19, 2012, EQT and a directits indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Distribution Holdco, LLC, entered into a Master Purchase Agreementmaster purchase agreement with PNG Companies LLC (PNG Companies), the parent company of Peoples Natural Gas Company LLC, to transfer 100% ownership of EQT’s LDC, Equitable Gas Company, LLC (Equitable Gas Company) to PNG Companies (the Equitable Gas Transaction). The parties completed the Equitable Gas Transaction on December 17, 2013. As consideration for the Equitable Gas Transaction, EQT received cash proceeds of approximately $748 million, select midstream assets, including an approximately 200 mile200-mile FERC-regulated natural gas transmission pipeline, referred to as the AVC facilities, that interconnects with the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage system, and commercial arrangements with the PNG Companies and its affiliates.

Prior to the completion of the Equitable Gas Transaction, Equitable Gas Company had contracts for an aggregate peak winter firm transmission capacity of 448 BBtu per day on the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage system, pursuant to firm

119


transportation agreements at the maximum rates specified in the Partnership’sEQM’s tariff, including two service agreements under the Partnership’sEQM’s no-notice firm transportation rate schedule, which features a higher maximum tariff rate than the Partnership’sEQM’s customary firm transportation service. Upon the completion of the Equitable Gas Transaction, the primary terms of Equitable Gas Company’s firm transportation service agreements and no-notice firm transportation service agreements were extended through March of 2034.

Asset Exchange Agreement

In connection with the Equitable Gas Transaction, EQT, Equitable Gas Company and Equitrans entered into an Asset Exchange Agreement, pursuant to which the parties transferred and exchanged to one another certain assets prior to the closing of the transfer of Equitable Gas Company. The asset transfers involving Equitrans consisted of (a) the transfer from Equitrans to Equitable Gas Company of the natural gas pipelines known as the Pennsylvania Gathering Pipelines, the Tombaugh Gathering Pipeline, the M-85 Transmission Pipeline, the H-153 Transmission Pipeline and the Crooked Creek property, and (b) the transfer from Equitable Gas Company to Equitrans of the natural gas pipeline known as the D-494 Transmission Pipeline.

AVC Lease

In connection with EQT’s acquisition of the AVC facilities in the Equitable Gas Transaction, the PartnershipEQM entered into a lease agreement with EQT pursuant to which the PartnershipEQM markets the capacity, enters into all agreements for transportation service with customers and operates the AVC facilities according to the terms of its tariff. The lease payment due each month is the lesser of the following alternatives: (1) a revenue-based payment reflecting the revenues generated by the operation of AVC minus the actual costs of operating AVC and (2) a payment based on depreciation expense and pre-tax return on invested capital for AVC. As a result, the payments to be made under the AVC lease will beare variable and isdo not expected to have a net positive or negative impact on EQM’s distributable cash flow. Upon termination of the AVC lease agreement, the PartnershipEQM will have the option to purchase the AVC facilities at a price to be negotiated between the parties. The lease payments due related to 2015, 2014 and 2013 totaled $22.1 million, $21.8 million.million and $1.0 million, respectively.

Sunrise Merger Agreement

On July 15, 2013, the PartnershipEQM and Equitrans entered into an Agreementagreement and Planplan of Mergermerger with EQT and Sunrise aPipeline, LLC (Sunrise), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT and the owner of the Sunrise Pipeline. Effective July 22, 2013, Sunrise merged with and into Equitrans, with Equitrans continuing as the surviving company (Sunrise Merger). The PartnershipEQM paid EQT consideration of $540 million, consisting of a $507.5 million cash payment, 479,184 PartnershipEQM common units and 267,942 PartnershipEQM general partner units. Prior to the Sunrise Merger, Equitrans entered into a precedent agreement with a third party for firm transportation service on the Sunrise Pipeline over a 20-year term (the Precedent Agreement). Pursuant to the Agreementagreement and Planplan of Merger, the Partnershipmerger, EQM made an additional payment of $110 million to EQT in January 2014 following the effectiveness of the transportation agreement contemplated by the Precedent Agreement.

Prior to the Sunrise Merger, the PartnershipEQM operated the Sunrise Pipeline as part of its transmission and storage system under a lease agreement with EQT. The lease was a capital lease under GAAP and, as a result, revenues and expenses associated with Sunrise were included in the Partnership’sEQM’s consolidated financial statements. Effective as of the closing of the Sunrise Merger, the lease agreement was terminated.




114


Jupiter Contribution Agreement

On April 30, 2014, EQM, the Partnership, its general partner,EQM General Partner, EQM Gathering Opco, LLC (EQM Gathering) and EQT Gathering entered into a contribution agreement (Contribution Agreement) pursuant to which, on May 7, 2014, EQT Gathering contributed Jupiter to EQM Gathering (Jupiter Acquisition). The aggregate consideration paid by the PartnershipEQM to EQT in connection with the Jupiter Acquisition was approximately $1,180 million, consisting of a $1,121 million cash payment and issuance of 516,050 EQM common units and 262,828 EQM general partner units.

NWV Gathering Contribution Agreement

On March 10, 2015, EQM entered into a contribution and sale agreement pursuant to which, on March 17, 2015, EQT contributed the Northern West Virginia Marcellus Gathering System (NWV Gathering) to EQM Gathering (NWV Gathering Acquisition). EQM paid total consideration of $925.7 million to EQT, consisting of approximately $873.2 million in cash, 511,973 EQM common units and 178,816 EQM general partner units.

The contribution and sale agreement also contemplated the sale to EQM of a preferred interest in EQT Energy Supply, LLC, which at the time was an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT. EQT Energy Supply, LLC generates revenue from services provided to an LDC. This sale was completed on April 15, 2015. The consideration paid by EQM to EQT in connection with the acquisition of the Partnership.preferred interest in EQT Energy Supply, LLC was approximately $124.3 million.

120



Mountain Valley Pipeline

On October 23, 2014, EQT announced that the Partnership is expected to assume EQT’sMarch 30, 2015, EQM assumed EQT's interest in Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC,the MVP Joint Venture (the MVP Interest Acquisition). The MVP Joint Venture is a joint venture with a subsidiaryaffiliates of each of NextEra Energy, Inc., Consolidated Edison, Inc., WGL Holdings, Inc., Vega Energy Partners, Ltd. and RGC Resources, Inc. EQM paid EQT approximately $54.2 million related to the MVP Interest Acquisition, which represented EQM's reimbursement to EQT for 100% of the capital contributions made by EQT to the MVP Joint Venture as of March 30, 2015. As of February 11, 2016,EQM owned a 45.5% interest in the MVP Joint Venture and serves as the operator of the MVP pipeline to be constructed by the joint venture. The Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP)estimated 300-mile MVP is currently targeted at 42 inches in diameter and a capacity of 2.0 Bcf per day, and will extend from the Partnership'sEQM’s existing transmission and storage system in Wetzel County, West Virginia to Pittsylvania County, Virginia. The Partnership expectsAs currently designed, the MVP is estimated to own the largest interest incost a total of $3.0 billion to $3.5 billion, excluding AFUDC, with EQM funding its proportionate share through capital contributions made to the joint venture and will operate the estimated 300-mile pipeline.venture. The joint ventureMVP Joint Venture has secured a total of 2.0 Bcf per day of 20-year firm capacity commitments, at 20-year terms from multiple shippers, including a 1.29 Bcf per day firm capacity commitment by EQT, and is currently in negotiation with additional shippers who have expressed interest in the MVP project. The pipeline, which is subjectMVP Joint Venture submitted the MVP certificate application to the FERC in October 2015 and anticipates receiving the certificate in the fourth quarter of 2016. Subject to FERC approval, will provide Marcellusconstruction is scheduled to begin shortly thereafter and Utica natural gas supply to the growing demand markets in the southeast region. The pipeline is expected to be in-service during the fourth quarter of 2018.

Transportation Service and Precedent Agreements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, the Partnership’sEQM’s transportation agreements with EQT accounted for approximately 57%61%, 80%57% and 84%80%, respectively, of the natural gas throughput on the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission system and 51%53%, 80%51% and 81%80%, respectively, of the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission revenues. EQT Energy, a wholly-ownedLLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EQT (EQT Energy), has contracted for firm transmission capacity of 1,076 BBtu per day on the Partnership’sEQM’s transmission and storage system with a primary term through October of 2024. The reserved capacity under this contract will decrease to 1,035 BBtu on August 1, 2016, 630 BBtu on July 1, 2023, 325 BBtu on September 1, 2023 and 30 BBtu on October 1, 2024.

            EQT Energy’s firm transportation agreement will automatically renew for one year periods upon the expiration of the primary term, subject to six months prior written notice by either party to terminate. In addition, the PartnershipEQM has also entered into an agreement with EQT Energy to provide interruptible transmission service, which is currently renewing automatically for one year periods, subject to six months prior written notice by either party to terminate.

In July 2014,October 2015, EQT Energy entered into a precedent agreement for 400 BBtu per day of firm transmission capacity utilizing proposed capacity which will be created by EQM’s proposed Equitrans Expansion Project.  The firm transmission capacity will become available upon completion of the project, which EQM expects to be completed by November 1, 2018.

In January 2016, EQT Energy entered into a firm transportation agreement for 650 BBtu per day of firm transmission capacity on the Partnership’s proposedEQM's Ohio Valley Connector pipeline. The firm transmission capacity will become available upon completion of the pipeline, which the PartnershipEQM expects to be completed by mid-yearyear-end 2016.

Storage Agreements

EQT is not currently a party to any firm storage agreements with the Partnership. The PartnershipEQM. EQM does, however, provide interruptible storage and lending and parking services to EQT pursuant to Rate Schedules INSS and LPS. Prior to the Equitable Gas Transaction, the PartnershipEQM provided firm storage services to Equitable Gas Company under four firm storage service agreements at the maximum rates specified in the Partnership’sEQM’s tariff. Upon the completion of the Equitable Gas Transaction, the primary terms of Equitable Gas Company’s firm storage service agreements were extended through March of 2034. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, EQT accounted for approximately 2%1%, 61%2% and 68%61%, respectively, of the Partnership’sEQM’s storage revenues. The reduction in storage revenue from EQT in 2014 and 2015 is because Equitable Gas Company is no longer an affiliate of EQT.
  
Gas Gathering Agreements

Prior to the Jupiter Acquisition, the Partnershipand NWV Gathering Acquisitions, EQM entered into twofour gas gathering agreements with EQT Energy. Prior to the Equitable Gas Transaction, the PartnershipEQM also provided gas gathering services to Equitable Gas Company under a gas gathering agreement. These agreements have a primary term of one year and renew automatically for one month periods, subject to 30 days prior written notice by either party to terminate. Service provided under these gathering agreements is fee-based at the rate specified in the Partnership’sEQM's tariff.

121



On April 30, 2014, EQT entered into a gas gathering agreement with EQT Gathering for gathering services on Jupiter (Jupiter(the Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement). The Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement has a 10-year term (with year-to-year rollovers), which began on May 1, 2014. Under the agreement, EQT subscribed for approximately 225 MMcf per day of firm compression

115


capacity. capacity which was available on Jupiter at that time. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the PartnershipEQM placed one compressor station in service and added compression at the two existing compressor stations in Greene County, Pennsylvania. In total, this expansion added approximately 350 MMcf per day of compression capacity. EQT’sEQT's firm capacity subscribed under the Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement increased by 200 MMcf per day effective December 1, 2014 and by 150 MMcf per day effective January 1, 2015. The Partnership anticipates futureIn the fourth quarter of 2015, EQM completed an additional expansion projectsproject which are expected to bringbrought the total Jupiter compression capacity to approximately 775 MMcf per day. EQT’s firm capacity subscribed under the Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement increased by approximately 50 MMcf per day by the year-endeffective October 1, 2015 and approximately 150 MMcf per day effective November 1, 2015. The Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement provides for separate ten year10-year terms (with year-to-year rollovers) for the compression capacity associated with each expansion project. EQT also agreed to pay a monthly usage fee for volumes gathered in excess of firm compression capacity. In connection with the closing of the Jupiter Acquisition, the Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement was assigned to EQM Gathering.

            EQT'sOn March 10, 2015, EQT entered into two gas gathering agreements accountedwith EQT Gathering for gathering services on the NWV Gathering system. The gathering agreement for gathering services on the wet gas header pipeline (WG-100 Gas Gathering Agreement) has a 10-year term (with year-to-year rollovers), beginning March 1, 2015. Under the agreement, EQT has subscribed for approximately 91%, 96% and 92%, respectively,400 MMcf per day of firm capacity currently available on the wet gas header pipeline. EQT also agreed to pay a usage fee for each dekatherm of natural gas gathered in excess of firm capacity. In connection with the closing of the Partnership’sNWV Gathering Acquisition, the WG-100 Gas Gathering Agreement was assigned to EQM Gathering.

            The gathering throughputagreement for gathering services in the Mercury, Pandora, Pluto and Saturn development areas (MPPS Gas Gathering Agreement) has a 10-year term (with year-to-year rollovers), beginning March 1, 2015. Under the agreement, EQT initially subscribed for approximately 200 MMcf per day of firm capacity then available in the Mercury development area, 40 MMcf per day of firm compression capacity in the Pluto development area and 220 MMcf per day of firm compression capacity in the Saturn development area. EQT's firm capacity subscribed under the MPPS Gas Gathering Agreement increased by 100 MMcf per day effective December 1, 2015 related to the completed expansion project in the Pandora development area. An additional planned expansion project is expected to bring the total Saturn compression capacity to 300 MMcf per day. EQT has agreed to separate 10-year terms (with year-to-year rollovers) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.compression capacity associated with each expansion project. EQT also agreed to pay a usage fee for each dekatherm of natural gas gathered in excess of firm capacity. In connection with the closing of the NWV Gathering Acquisition, the MPPS Gas Gathering Agreement was assigned to EQM Gathering.

            For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, EQT accounted for approximately 93%97%, 96% and 93%97%, respectively, of the Partnership’sEQM's gathering revenues in each year.

The table below sets forth the revenues recognized by the PartnershipEQM with respect to the transportation,transmission, storage and gathering agreements described above with EQT for the yearyears ended December 31, 2014.2015, 2014 and 2013.
Years Ended December 31,
2015 2014 2013
(Thousands)
DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE
REVENUES
(MILLIONS)
   
  
Transmission and storage$116.4
$141,198
 $116,357
 $135,998
Gathering$128.7
$306,389
 $212,170
 $174,247
 
     EQT Corporation Guaranty

            EQT has entered into a guaranty agreement to guarantee all payment obligations, plus interest and any other charges, due and payable by EQT Energy to Equitrans pursuant to the agreements discussed above, up to $50 million. This guaranty will terminate on November 30, 2023 unless terminated earlier by EQT by providing 10 days written notice.

Acreage Dedication

            Pursuant to an acreage dedication to the PartnershipEQM by EQT, the PartnershipEQM has the right to elect to transport, at a negotiated rate, which will be the higher of a market or cost of service rate, all natural gas produced from wells drilled by EQT on the dedicated

122


acreage, which is an area covering approximately 60,000 acres surrounding the Partnership’sEQM’s storage assets in Allegheny, Washington and Greene counties in Pennsylvania and Wetzel, Marion, Taylor, Tyler, Doddridge, Harrison and Lewis counties in West Virginia. The acreage dedication is contained in a sublease agreement in which the PartnershipEQM granted to EQT all of the oil and gas interests, including the exclusive rights to drill, explore for, produce and market such oil and gas, the PartnershipEQM had received as part of certain of its oil and gas leasehold estates the PartnershipEQM uses for gas storage and protection. Furthermore, if EQT acquires acreage with natural gas storage rights within the area of mutual interest established by the acreage dedication, then EQT will enter into an agreement with the PartnershipEQM to permit it to store natural gas on such acreage. Likewise, if the PartnershipEQM acquires acreage within the area of mutual interest with natural gas or oil production, development, marketing and exploration rights, such acreage will automatically become subject to EQT's rights under the acreage dedication.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard has adopted a related person transaction approval policy that establishes procedures for the identification, review and approval of related person transactions. Pursuant to the policy, the management of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner is charged with primary responsibility for determining whether, based on the facts and circumstances, a proposed transaction is a related person transaction.

For purposes of the policy, a "Related Person" is any director or executive officer of the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner, any nominee for director, any unitholder known to the PartnershipEQM to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Partnership’sEQM’s voting securities, and any immediate family member of any such person. A "Related Person Transaction" is generally a transaction in which the PartnershipEQM is, or the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner or any of its subsidiaries is, a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest. Transactions resolved under the conflicts provision of theEQM’s partnership agreement are not required to be reviewed or approved under the policy. Please read "Conflicts of Interest" below.


116


To assist management in making this determination, the policy sets forth certain categories of transactions that are deemed to be pre-approved by the boardBoard under the policy. The transactions which are automatically pre-approved include (i) transactions involving employment of the Partnership’sEQM General Partner’s executive officers, as long as the executive officer is not an immediate family member of another of the Partnership’sEQM General Partner’s executive officers or directors and the compensation paid to such executive officer was approved by the board;Board; (ii) transactions involving compensation and benefits paid to the Partnership’sEQM General Partner’s directors for service as a director; (iii) transactions on competitive business terms with another company in which a director or immediate family member of the director's only relationship is as an employee or executive officer, a director, or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company's shares, provided that the amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of the other company's consolidated gross revenues; (iv) transactions where the interest of the Related Person arises solely from the ownership of a class of equity securities of the Partnership,EQM, and all holders of that class of equity securities receive the same benefit on a pro rata basis; (v) transactions where the rates or charges involved are determined by competitive bids; (vi) transactions involving the rendering of services as a common or contract carrier or public utility at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental regulation; (vii) transactions involving services as a bank depositary of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture or similar services; and (viii) any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by the PartnershipEQM or any affiliated charitable foundation to a charitable or non-profit organization, foundation or university in which a Related Person's only relationship is as an employee or a director or trustee, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of the recipient's consolidated gross revenues.

If, after applying these categorical standards and weighing all of the facts and circumstances, management determines that a proposed transaction is a related person transaction,Related Person Transaction, management must present the proposed transaction to the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard for review or, if impracticable under the circumstances, to the chairman of the board.Board. The boardBoard must then either approve or reject the transaction in accordance with the terms of the policy taking into account all facts and circumstances, including (i) the benefits to the PartnershipEQM of the transaction; (ii) the terms of the transaction; (iii) the terms available to unaffiliated third parties and employees generally; (iv) the extent of the affected director or executive officer's interest in the transaction; and (v) the potential for the transaction to affect the individual's independence or judgment. The boardBoard of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner may, but is not required to, seek the approval of the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee for the resolution of any related person transaction.
 
Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future as a result of the relationships between the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner and its affiliates, including EQT, on the one hand, and the PartnershipEQM and its limited partners, on the other hand. The directors and officers of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner have fiduciary duties to manage the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner in a manner beneficial to its owners. At the same time, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner has a duty to manage the PartnershipEQM in a manner beneficial to the PartnershipEQM and its limited partners. The Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the Delaware Act) provides that Delaware limited

123


partnerships may, in their partnership agreements, expand, restrict or eliminate the fiduciary duties otherwise owed by a general partner to limited partners and the partnership. Pursuant to these provisions, the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement contains various provisions replacing the fiduciary duties that would otherwise be owed by its general partner with contractual standards governing the duties of the general partner and the methods of resolving conflicts of interest. The Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement also specifically defines the remedies available to limited partners for actions taken that, without these defined liability standards, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty under applicable Delaware law.

Whenever a conflict arises between the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner or its affiliates, on the one hand, and the PartnershipEQM or any other partner, on the other, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner will resolve that conflict. The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner may seek the approval of such resolution from the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee of the board of directors of its general partner.Board. There is no requirement that the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner seek the approval of the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee for the resolution of any conflict, and, under the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner may decide to seek such approval or resolve a conflict of interest in any other way permitted by the partnership agreement, as described below, in its sole discretion. The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner will decide whether to refer the matter to the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee on a case-by-case basis. An independent third party is not required to evaluate the fairness of the resolution.

The Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner will not be in breach of its obligations under the partnership agreement or its duties to the PartnershipEQM or its limited partners if the resolution of the conflict is:

approved by the conflicts committee;Conflicts Committee of the EQM General Partner, although the EQM General Partner is under no obligation to seek such approval;
approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner or any of its affiliates;

117


determined by the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard to be on terms no less favorable to the PartnershipEQM than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
determined by the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard to be fair and reasonable to the Partnership,EQM, taking into account the totality of the relationships betweenamong the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to the Partnership.EQM.

The EQM General Partner may, but is not required to, seek the approval of such resolution from the Conflicts Committee of its Board. If the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner does not seek approval from the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee and the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth bullet points above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partnerBoard acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the PartnershipEQM challenging such determination, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption. In resolving conflicts of interest under the standard set forth in the fourth bullet point above, the EQM partnership agreement permits the Board to take into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to EQM, in determining what is fair and reasonable to EQM. Fair and reasonable is not defined in the EQM partnership agreement and what constitutes fair and reasonable will depend on the circumstances. Furthermore, the EQM partnership agreement permits the EQM General Partner Board to consult with legal counsel, investment bankers and other advisors in making decisions, though the extent to which the Board will seek such advice will depend on the facts and circumstances of the transaction being considered. If the EQM General Partner Board reasonably believes that advice or an opinion provided by such advisors is within such person's professional or expert competence, then any act taken in reliance upon such advice or opinion will conclusively be deemed to be fair and reasonable. Unless the resolution of a conflict is specifically provided for in the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement, the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner or the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee of the general partner's board of directorsits Board may consider any factors it determines in good faith to consider when resolving a conflict. When the Partnership’sEQM’s partnership agreement requires someone to act in good faith, it requires that person to subjectively believe that he is acting in the best interests of the PartnershipEQM or meets the specified standard, for example, a transaction on terms no less favorable to the PartnershipEQM than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties.

Director Independence
    
The NYSE does not require a listed publicly traded limited partnership, such as the Partnership,EQM, to have a majority of independent directors on the board of directors of its general partner. To assist it in determining the independence of the directors of the Partnership’s general partner,EQM General Partner, the Board established guidelines, which are included in its corporate governance guidelines and conform to the independence requirements under the NYSE listing standards. For a discussion of the independence of the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partner,Board, please see Item 10, “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance-Committees of the Board of Directors.”

124



Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
Ernst & Young LLP served as the Partnership’sEQM’s independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2014.2015. The following chart details the fees billed to the PartnershipEQM by Ernst & Young LLP during 20142015 and 2013:2014:  
  
2014
(Thousands)
 
2013
(Thousands)
Audit Fees (1)
 $711
 $557
Audit-Related Fees (2)
 648
 205
Tax Fees 
 
All Other Fees 
 
Total $1,359
 $762
 Years Ended December 31,
 2015 2014
Audit fees (1)
$1,119,436
 $711,458
Audit-related fees (2)
52,500
 647,500
Tax fees
 
All other fees
 
Total$1,171,936
 $1,358,958
 
(1)Includes fees for the audit of the Partnership’sEQM’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, reviews of financial statements included in the Partnership’sEQM’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including certain attest engagements, comfort letter procedures and consents.

(2)Includes fees for services associated with PartnershipEQM acquisitions from EQT.EQT and attest engagements not required by statute or regulation.

The audit committeeAudit Committee of the Partnership’s general partnerEQM General Partner has adopted a policy regarding the services of its independent auditors under which the Partnership’sEQM’s independent accounting firm is not allowed to perform any service that may have the effect of jeopardizing the independent public accountant’s independence. Without limiting the foregoing, the independent accounting firm shall not be retained to perform the following:

Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements
Financial information systems design and implementation
Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports
Actuarial services
Internal audit outsourcing services
Management functions
Human resources functions

118


Broker-dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services
Legal services
Expert services unrelated to the audit
Prohibited tax services
    
All audit and permitted non-audit services must be pre-approved by the audit committee.Audit Committee. The audit committeeAudit Committee has delegated specific pre-approval authority with respect to audit and permitted non-audit services to the Chairman of the audit committeeAudit Committee but only where pre-approval is required to be acted upon prior to the next audit committeeAudit Committee meeting and where the aggregate audit and permitted non-audit services fees are not more than $75,000. The audit committeeAudit Committee encourages management to seek pre-approval from the audit committeeAudit Committee at its regularly scheduled meetings. In 2014,2015, 100% of the professional fees reported as audit-related fees were pre-approved pursuant to the above policy.

The audit committeeAudit Committee has approved the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Partnership’sEQM’s independent auditor to conduct the audit of the Partnership’sEQM’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016.

125



PART IV
 
Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
 
(a) 1
 Financial Statements
    The financial statements listed in the accompanying index to financial statements are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
  2
 Financial Statement Schedules
    All schedules are omitted since the subject matter thereof is either not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules.
  3
 Exhibits
    
The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits (pages 120127 through 122)131) are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
 
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COVERED
BY REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
1.             The following Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements of EQT Midstream Partners, LP and Subsidiaries are included in Item 8:
 
  Page  Reference
Statements of Consolidated Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20142015 
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20142015 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142015 and 20132014 
Statements of Consolidated Partners’ Capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20142015 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 


119126



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 
ExhibitsDescriptionMethod of Filing
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 15, 2013, by and among EQT Investments Holdings, LLC, EQT Midstream Services, LLC, Sunrise Pipeline, LLC, EQT Midstream Partners, LP and Equitrans, L.P. EQT Midstream Partners, LP dated as of July 15, 2013. The Partnership will furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule and similar attachment to the CommissionSEC upon request.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on July 15, 2013.
2.2Contribution Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2014, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, EQT Midstream Services, LLC, EQM Gathering Opco, LLC and EQT Gathering, LLC, dated as of April 30, 2014. The PartnershipLLC. EQT Midstream Partners, LP will furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule and similar attachment to the SEC upon request.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on April 30, 2014.
2.3Contribution and Sale Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2015, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, EQT Midstream Services, LLC, EQM Gathering Opco, LLC, EQT Corporation, EQT Gathering, LLC, EQT Energy Supply Holdings, LP, and EQT Energy, LLC. EQT Midstream Partners, LP will furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule and similar attachment to the SEC upon request.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on March 10, 2015.
3.1Certificate of Limited Partnership of EQT Midstream Partners, LP.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on February 13, 2012.
3.2First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of EQT Midstream Partners, LP, dated as of July 2, 2012.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on July 2, 2012.
3.3Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of EQT Midstream Partners, LP, dated as of July 24, 2014.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014.
3.4Amendment No. 2 to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of EQT Midstream Partners, LP, dated as of July 23, 2015.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015.
3.5Certificate of Formation of EQT Midstream Services, LLC.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on February 13, 2012.
3.53.6FirstThird Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of EQT Midstream Services, LLC, dated July 2, 2012.as of May 15, 2015.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.43.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on July 2, 2012.
3.6Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of EQT Midstream Services, LLC, dated July 24, 2014.Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014.May 15, 2015.
4.1Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2014, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, as issuer, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on August 1, 2014.
4.2First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2014, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, as issuer, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on August 1, 2014.
10.1Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2012, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, EQT Midstream Services, LLC, Equitrans Investments, LLC, Equitrans, L.P., Equitrans Services, LLC, EQT Midstream Investments, LLC, EQT Investments Holdings, LLC, ET Blue Grass, LLC and EQT Corporation.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on July 2, 2012.
10.2Omnibus Agreement, dated July 2, 2012, by and among the EQT Midstream Partners, LP, EQT Midstream Services, LLC and EQT Corporation.Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on July 2, 2012.
10.3Amended and Restated Operation and Management Services Agreement, dated May 7, 2014, by and among Equitrans, L.P., EQT Midstream Partners, LP, EQT Midstream Services, LLC and EQT Gathering, LLC.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.3.
10.4Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated February 18, 2014, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders named therein.Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on February 18, 2014.

Each management contract and compensatory arrangement in which any director or any named executive officer participates has been marked with an asterisk (*)

120127


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

ExhibitsDescriptionMethod of Filing
10.2Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2015, by and among EQT Gathering, LLC, EQT Midstream Partners, LP and MVP Holdco, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015.
10.3(a)Omnibus Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2012, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, EQT Midstream Services, LLC and EQT Corporation.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on July 2, 2012.
10.3(b)Amendment No. 1 to Omnibus Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2015, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, EQT Midstream Services, LLC and EQT Corporation.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on March 17, 2015.
10.4Amended and Restated Operation and Management Services Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2014, by and among Equitrans, L.P., EQT Midstream Partners, LP, EQT Midstream Services, LLC and EQT Gathering, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-K (#001-35574) for the year ended December 31, 2014.
10.5Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2015, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP and the Managers named therein.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on August 27, 2015.
10.6(a)Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2014, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on February 18, 2014.
10.6(b)First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Release of Guarantors, dated as of January 22, 2015, by and among EQT Midstream Partners, LP, the Partnership, the Guarantorsguarantors party thereto, the Lenderslenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent.administrative agent.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on January 22, 2015.
10.610.7*EQT Midstream Services, LLC 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated as of July 2, 2012.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on July 2, 2012.
10.7*10.8*Form of Phantom Unit Award Agreement.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.8*Form of TSR Performance Award Agreement.Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.9*Form of EQT 2014 Value DriverTSR Performance Award Agreement.Filed herewith asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9.
10.10Form of Transportation Service Agreement Applicable to Firm Transportation Service Under Rate Schedule FTS between Equitrans, L.P. and Equitable Gas Company, LLC.Filed as Exhibit 10.910.7 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.1110.10*Form of Transportation Service Agreement ApplicableEQT 2014 Value Driver Performance Award Agreement.Incorporated herein by reference to No-Notice Firm Transportation Service Under Rate Schedule NOFT between Equitrans, LP and Equitable Gas Company, LLC.Filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.12Agreement to Extend Services Agreements between Equitrans, LP and Equitable Gas Company, LLC.Filed as Exhibit 10.1010.9 to Form 10-K (#001-35574) for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014.
10.1310.11(a)*EQT GuarantyAmended and Restated Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition Agreement, dated April 25, 2012, executedas of July 29, 2015, by and between EQT Corporation in favor of Equitrans, L.P.and Theresa Z. Bone.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 210.3 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015.
10.1410.11(b)*SubleaseAmended and Restated Change of Control Agreement, dated as February 19, 2013, by and between Equitrans, L.P.EQT Corporation and EQT Production Company, effective March 1, 2011.Theresa Z. Bone.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 210.23 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.10-K (#001-35574) for the year ended December 31, 2014.
10.1510.11(c)*AmendmentTermination of SubleaseAmended and Restated Change of Control Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2015, by and between Equitrans, L.P.EQT Corporation and EQT Production Company, dated April 5, 2012.Theresa Z. Bone.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Amendment No. 210.4 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015.
10.16*10.12*Form of Director and/or Executive Officer Indemnification Agreement.Filed asIncorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on June 5, 2012.
10.17Sunrise Facilities Amended and Restated Lease Agreement between Equitrans, L.P. and Sunrise Pipeline, L.L.C., as amended and restated as of October 25, 2012.Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012.
10.18Transportation Service Agreement Applicable to Firm Transportation Service Under Rate Schedule FTS between Equitrans, LP and EQT Energy, LLC, dated December 20, 2013, Contract No. EQTR 18679-852.Filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K (#001-35574) for the year ended December 31, 2013.
10.19Sunrise Expansion Precedent Agreement, dated May 30, 2013, between Equitrans, LP and EQT Energy, LLC.Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K (#001-35574) for the year ended December 31, 2013.
10.20Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement between EQT Production Company, EQT Energy LLC and EQT Gathering, LLC. Specific items in this exhibit, as marked by three asterisks (***), were omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. The redacted material has been separately filed with the SEC.Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014.

Each management contract and compensatory arrangement in which any director or any named executive officer participates has been marked with an asterisk (*)

121128


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

ExhibitsDescriptionMethod of Filing
10.13(a)Sublease Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2011, by and between Equitrans, L.P. and EQT Production Company.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.13(b)Amendment of Sublease Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2012, by and between Equitrans, L.P. and EQT Production Company.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.14EQT Guaranty dated as of April 25, 2012, executed by EQT Corporation in favor of Equitrans, L.P.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.15Sunrise Facilities Amended and Restated Lease Agreement by and between Equitrans, L.P. and Sunrise Pipeline, L.L.C., as amended and restated as of October 25, 2012.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012.
10.16Form of Transportation Service Agreement Applicable to Firm Transportation Service Under Rate Schedule FTS by and between Equitrans, L.P. and Equitable Gas Company, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.17Form of Transportation Service Agreement Applicable to No-Notice Firm Transportation Service Under Rate Schedule NOFT by and between Equitrans, L.P. and Equitable Gas Company, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (#333-179487) filed on May 10, 2012.
10.18Agreement to Extend Services Agreements, dated as of December 10, 2013, by and between Equitrans, L.P. and Equitable Gas Company, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K (#001-35574) for the year ended December 31, 2013.
10.19Transportation Service Agreement Applicable to Firm Transportation Service Under Rate Schedule FTS, Contract No. EQTR 18679-852, dated as of December 20, 2013, by and between Equitrans, L.P. and EQT Energy, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K (#001-35574) for the year ended December 31, 2013.
10.20Sunrise Expansion Precedent Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2013, by and between Equitrans, L.P. and EQT Energy, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K (#001-35574) for the year ended December 31, 2013.
10.21Precedent Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2014, by and between Equitrans, L.P. and EQT Energy, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014.
10.22Transportation Service Agreement Applicable to Firm Transportation Service Under Rate Schedule FTS, Contract No. EQTR 20242-852, dated as of September 24, 2014, by and between Equitrans, L.P. and EQT Energy, LLC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015.
10.23Transportation Service Agreement Applicable to Firm Transportation Service Under Rate Schedule FTS, dated as of January 8, 2016, by and between Equitrans, L.P. and EQT Energy, LLC.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.23.
10.24(a)Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement, effective as of May 1, 2014, by and among EQT Production Company and EQT Energy, LLC, on the one hand, and EQM Gathering Opco, LLC (as assignee of EQT Gathering, LLC), on the other hand. Specific items in this exhibit have been redacted, as marked by three asterisks [***], because confidential treatment for those items was granted by the SEC. The redacted material has been separately filed with the SEC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014.

Each management contract and compensatory arrangement in which any director or any named executive officer participates has been marked with an asterisk (*)

129


INDEX TO EXHIBITS
  
ExhibitsDescriptionMethod of Filing
10.2110.24(b)PrecedentAmendment No. 1 to Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement, for Transportation Services, dated July 23,as of December 17, 2014, between Equitrans, LPby and among EQT Production Company and EQT Energy, LLC.LLC, on the one hand, and EQM Gathering Opco, LLC, on the other hand.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.24(b).
10.24(c)Amendment No. 2 to Jupiter Gas Gathering Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2015, by and among EQT Production Company and EQT Energy, LLC, on the one hand, and EQM Gathering Opco, LLC, on the other hand. Specific items in this exhibit have been redacted, as marked by three asterisks [***], because confidential treatment for those items has been requested from the SEC. The redacted material has been separately filed with the SEC.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.24(c).
10.25(a)Gas Gathering Agreement for the Mercury, Pandora, Pluto and Saturn Gas Gathering Systems, effective as of March 1, 2015, by and among EQT Production Company and EQT Energy, LLC, on the one hand, and EQM Gathering Opco, LLC (as assignee of EQT Gathering, LLC), on the other hand. Specific items in this exhibit have been redacted, as marked by three asterisks [***], because confidential treatment for those items was granted by the SEC. The redacted material has been separately filed with the SEC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on March 31, 2015.
10.25(b)Amendment No. 1 to Gas Gathering Agreement for the Mercury, Pandora, Pluto and Saturn Gas Gathering Systems, dated as of September 18, 2015, by and among EQT Production Company and EQT Energy, LLC, on the one hand, and EQM Gathering Opco, LLC, on the other hand.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.25(b).
10.26Gas Gathering Agreement for the WG-100 Gas Gathering System, effective as of March 1, 2015, by and among EQT Production Company and EQT Energy, LLC, on the one hand, and EQM Gathering Opco, LLC (as assignee of EQT Gathering, LLC), on the other hand. Specific items in this exhibit have been redacted, as marked by three asterisks [***], because confidential treatment for those items was granted by the SEC. The redacted material has been separately filed with the SEC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on March 31, 2015.
10.27(a)Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, dated as of March 10, 2015, by and among MVP Holdco, LLC, US Marcellus Gas Infrastructure, LLC, WGL Midstream, Inc., Vega Midstream MVP LLC, VED NPI IV, LLC and Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC. Specific items in this exhibit have been redacted, as marked by three asterisks [***], because confidential treatment for those items was granted by the SEC. The redacted material has been separately filed with the SEC.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K (#001-35574) filed on March 31, 2015.
10.27(b)Exhibit A to Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, dated as of March 10, 2015, by and among MVP Holdco, LLC, US Marcellus Gas Infrastructure, LLC, WGL Midstream, Inc., Vega Midstream MVP LLC, VED NPI IV, LLC, RGC Midstream, LLC and Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (as amended effective as of October 1, 2015).Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q (#001-35574) for the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2014.
10.22(a)*

Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition Agreement dated as of September 8, 2008 between EQT Corporation and Theresa Z. Bone.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.22(a).
10.22(b)*Amendment to Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition Agreement effective as of January 1, 2014 between EQT Corporation and Theresa Z. Bone.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.22(b).
10.22(c)*Second Amendment to Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition Agreement effective as of January 1, 201 between EQT Corporation and Theresa Z. Bone.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.22(c).
10.23*Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement, dated as February 19, 2013, by and between EQT Corporation and Theresa Z. Bone.Filed herewith as Exhibit 10.23.2015.
12.1Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.Filed herewith as Exhibit 12.1.
21.1List of Subsidiaries of EQT Midstream Partners, LP.Filed herewith as Exhibit 21.1.
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Filed herewith as Exhibit 23.1.
31.1Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.Filed herewith as Exhibit 31.1.

Each management contract and compensatory arrangement in which any director or any named executive officer participates has been marked with an asterisk (*)

130


INDEX TO EXHIBITS
ExhibitsDescriptionMethod of Filing
31.2Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.Filed herewith as Exhibit 31.2.
32Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.Furnished herewith as Exhibit 32.
99Named Executive Officer Compensation 2016 Peer Companies (General Industry)Filed herewith as Exhibit 32.99.
101Interactive Data File.Filed herewith as Exhibit 101.

Each management contract and compensatory arrangement in which any director or any named executive officer participates has been marked with an asterisk (*)

122131



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 EQT Midstream Partners, LP
  
 By: EQT Midstream Services, LLC, its General Partner
  
 By:/s/   DAVID L. PORGES
  David L. Porges
  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
  February 12, 201511, 2016
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
/s/  DAVID L. PORGES Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer February 12, 201511, 2016
David L. Porges   
(Principal Executive Officer)    
     
/s/  PHILIP P. CONTI Director, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer February 12, 201511, 2016
Philip P. Conti   
(Principal Financial Officer)    
     
/s/  THERESA Z. BONE Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer February 12, 201511, 2016
Theresa Z. Bone   
(Principal Accounting Officer)    
     
/s/  JULIAN M. BOTT Director February 12, 201511, 2016
Julian M. Bott    
     
/s/  MICHAEL A. BRYSON Director February 12, 201511, 2016
Michael A. Bryson    
     
/s/  RANDALL L. CRAWFORD Director February 12, 201511, 2016
Randall L. Crawford    
     
/s/  LEWIS B. GARDNER Director February 12, 201511, 2016
Lewis B. Gardner    
     
/s/  LARA E. WASHINGTON Director February 12, 201511, 2016
Lara E. Washington    


123132