UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from [_______ to _______]


Commission file number 001-35492
abcorelogo2ca06.jpg
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Hawai`iHawaii45-4849780
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)Identification No.)
822 Bishop Street
Post Office Box 3440, Honolulu Hawai`i , Hawaii96801
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
808-525-6611
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, without par valueNYSEALEXNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at February 15, 2018:14, 2020:
71,952,94472,306,508
Aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2017:2019:
$1,915,753,183.861,668,784,587
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YesxNo o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes oNox
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesxNo o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YesxNo o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerx
Accelerated filero
Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth companyo 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes oNo x
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Part III of Form 10-K)

1





TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Page Page
      
Items 1 & 2. Business and Properties by Business Segments Business and Properties by Business Segments
      
A. Commercial Real Estate Commercial Real Estate
      
B. Land Operations  Land Operations 
 (1)Landholdings (1)Landholdings
 (2)Development-for-sale Projects (2)Active Development-for-sale Projects
 (3)Renewable Energy (3)Renewable Energy
      
C. Materials & Construction Materials & Construction
      
 Employees and Labor Relations Employees and Labor Relations
      
 Available Information Available Information
      
Item 1A. Risk Factors Risk Factors
      
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Unresolved Staff Comments
      
Item 3. Legal Proceedings Legal Proceedings
      
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Mine Safety Disclosures
 
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
    
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
    
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    
Items 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
    
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


i



 Page
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
    
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
    
A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
    
B. Internal Control over Financial Reporting
    
Item 9B.C. Other InformationManagement's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
    
A. Directors
    
B. Executive Officers
    
C. Corporate Governance
    
D. Code of Ethics
    
Item 11. Executive Compensation
    
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
    
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
    
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
    
A. Financial Statements
    
B. Financial Statement Schedules
    
C. Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
    
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
    
Signatures



ii






ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
FORM 10-K
Annual Report for the Fiscal Year
Ended December 31, 20172019
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Business and Strategy
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (“("A&B”&B" or the “Company”"Company") is a fully integrated real estate company that plans to elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust or REIT, for US federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2017. A&B’s("REIT") whose history in Hawai`Hawai‘i dates back to 1870. Over time, we havethe Company has evolved from a 571-acre sugar plantation on Maui to become what management believes is one of Hawai`Hawai‘i's premier real estate companies and the owner of the largest anchored strip retailgrocery-anchored, neighborhood shopping center portfolio in the state. Following our separation from Matson, Inc. (NYSE: MATX) in mid-2012, we implementedAfter a focused strategylong period as a holding company of operationally and geographically diverse business interests and assets, the Company established a strategic intent to concentrate the Company’s assets and operations in Hawai`i, where our management team is best able to employ extensive local market knowledge andbecome a Hawai‘i-focused commercial real estate expertisecompany, through which the Company would be able to create value for both shareholders and the community. Since 2012,community using its extensive local market knowledge and real estate expertise. To execute this strategy, the Company has endeavored to expand and strengthen its Hawai‘i commercial real estate platform and simplify its business, primarily through monetizing non-core assets. The Company has made significant progress in concentrating ourexecuting its strategy, including, most recently, completing the migration of its mainland commercial real estate portfolio in Hawai`to Hawai‘i ("Migration Strategy"Migration") such, completing the sale of approximately 41,000 acres of non-income-producing agricultural lands on Maui and redeploying proceeds from that sale into six commercial real estate assets on a tax-deferred basis.
As of December 31, 2019, the shareCompany's commercial real estate portfolio consists of cash net operating income ("NOI") generated by Hawai`i commercial assets has grown from about 43 percent in 2012 to 87 percent in 2017. In addition to our 1522 retail centers, ten industrial assets and four office properties, representing a total of 3.9 million square feet of gross leasable area ("GLA"), as well as ground leases comprising 153.8 acres in Hawai`i,Hawai‘i. In total (inclusive of its commercial real estate portfolio), the Company owns eight industrial assets, six office propertiesover 29,000 acres of land in Hawai‘i, primarily conservation- and a portfolio of urban ground leases comprising 117 acres in Hawai`i. As a result of A&B's agricultural history, the Company's assets include over 86,000 acres in Hawai`i, making it the state's fourth largest private landowner (by acreage). On the U.S. Mainland, the Company owns six remaining commercial assets as of December 31, 2017. Total portfolio gross leasable area (GLA) was 4.0 million square feet at the end of 2017.
The Company started a real estate development company in 1949 to develop the master-planned community of Kahului, Maui, providing homes for sale to its plantation employees. Today, we are emphasizing a capital-light approach to residential real estate development with a strategic preference to monetize land assets earlier in the development cycle and continuing our strategic focus of investing capital into income producing commercial real estate in Hawai`i. In addition, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Grace Pacific LLC (“Grace”), the Company operates the largest materials and paving company in Hawai`i.
The Company has completed a conversion process to comply with the requirements to be treated as a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2017. In connection with our conversion to a REIT, the Company completed a holding company merger ("Holding Company Merger") in order to facilitate the Company's ongoing REIT compliance. Pursuant to the Holding Company Merger, the then-existing Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. ("A&B Predecessor"), Alexander & Baldwin REIT Holdings, Inc., a Hawai`i corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of A&B Predecessor (“A&B REIT Holdings”), and A&B REIT Merger Corporation, a Hawai`i corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of A&B REIT Holdings (“Merger Sub”) completed a merger through which Merger Sub was merged with and into A&B Predecessor, with A&B Predecessor continuing as the surviving corporation and being renamed "Alexander & Baldwin Investments, LLC." Additionally, as a result of the Holding Company Merger, A&B REIT Holdings replaced A&B Predecessor as the Hawai`i-based, publicly held corporation through which the Company’s operations are conducted, and all shares of common stock, including the reserve of common stock issuable under the outstanding awards and equity incentive compensation plans, of A&B Predecessor were converted into shares of A&B REIT Holdings common stock on a one-for-one basis. Promptly following the merger, A&B REIT Holdings was renamed “Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.”
In this Annual Report, unless the context requires otherwise, references to A&B or the Company refer to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. prior to the consummation of the Holding Company Merger (subsequently renamed Alexander & Baldwin Investments, LLC) and to A&B REIT Holdings following consummation of the Holding Company Merger (subsequently renamed Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.).
Our Company is in many ways part of the fabric of Hawai`i: in order to maximize our value to shareholders, we are committed to being partners with Hawai`i and emphasize investments and activities that enhance the quality of life within our Hawaiian communities. Through this commitment and the underpinning of our vision, mission and values, which emphasize integrity and community, we have excelled throughout our 147-year history and have the opportunity to deliver outperformance to our shareholders.

1



agriculture-zoned, but also urban-zoned land.
The Company operates three segments: Commercial Real Estate; Land Operations; and Materials & Construction. A description of each of the Company's reporting segments is as follows:
Commercial Real Estate ("CRE") functions as a vertically integrated real estate investment company with core competencies in investments and acquisitions (i.e., raising capital, identifying opportunities and acquiring properties); construction and development (i.e., designing and ground-up development of new properties or repositioning and redevelopment of existing properties); in-house leasing and property management (i.e., executing new and renegotiating renewal lease arrangements, managing its properties' day-to-day operations and maintaining positive tenant relationships); and asset management (i.e., maintaining, upgrading and enhancing its portfolio of high-quality improved properties). The segment's preferred asset classes include improved properties in retail and industrial spaces and also urban ground leases. Its focus within improved retail properties, in particular, is on grocery-anchored neighborhood shopping centers that meet the daily needs of Hawai‘i citizens. Through its core competencies and with its experience and relationships in Hawai‘i, the Company seeks to create special places and experiences for Hawai‘i residents as well as providing venues and opportunities for tenants to thrive. Income from this segment is principally generated by owning, operating and leasing real estate assets.
Land Operations involves the management and optimization of the Company's historical landholdings primarily through the following activities: planning and entitlement of real property to facilitate sales; selling undeveloped land; and other operationally-diverse legacy business activities to employ its landholdings at their highest and best use. Financial results from this segment are principally derived from real estate development sales, land parcel sales, income/loss from real estate joint ventures and other legacy business activities.
Materials & Construction ("M&C") operates as Hawai‘i's largest asphalt paving contractor and is one of the state's largest natural materials and infrastructure construction companies. Such activities are primarily conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Grace Pacific LLC ("Grace Pacific"), a materials and construction company in Hawai‘i.
Commercial Real Estate ("CRE"): includes leasing, property management, redevelopmentOf the Company's total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2019, 73.5% are within the CRE segment, 13.6% are within Land Operations and development-for-hold activities. Significant assets include improved commercial real estate and urban ground leases. Income from this segment is principally generated by leasing and operating real estate assets.
Land Operations: includes planning, zoning, financing, constructing, purchasing, managing, selling, and investing in real property; leasing agricultural land; renewable energy; and diversified agribusiness. Primary assets include landholdings, renewable energy assets (investments in hydroelectric and solar facilities and power purchase agreements) and development projects. Income from this segment is principally generated by renewable energy operations, agricultural leases, select farming operations, development sales and fees, and parcel sales.
11.7% are within Materials & Construction, ("M&C"): performs asphalt paving as prime contractorwith the remainder unallocated and subcontractor; imports and sells liquid asphalt; mines, processes and sells basalt aggregate; produces and sells asphaltic concrete; provides and sells various construction- and traffic-control-related products; and manufactures and sells precast concrete products. Assets include two grade A (prime) rock quarries, an asphalt storage terminal, hot mix asphalt plants and quarry and paving equipment. Income is generated principally by materials supply and paving construction.
Proportionately, the Commercial Real Estate segment represents 53% percent of the Company's business, Land Operations represents 29% percent and Materials & Construction represents 18% percent (determined by its share of 2017 identifiable assets from the three segments).used for corporate purposes. Additional information about ourthe Company's business segments is provided in "Management's Discussion and Analysis


of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements," which are included elsewhere in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.
Strategically, the Company remainsThe Company's strategy is principally focused on:
GrowingIncreasing recurring income streams by leveraging several sources of Commercial Real Estate portfolio growth including:
Effective leasing and property management,
Repositioning and redevelopment of existing assets,
Ground-up development of new assets,
Acquisitions of new assets using tax-deferred exchange funds from land/property sales and/or
Acquisitions of new assets using the Company's balance sheet.
Executing on its commercial real estate portfolio;simplification strategy which includes:
Employing landholdings at their highest and best use, including for diversified agribusiness purposes;
Entitling, planning, developing and selling real estate;
Leveraging its strong Materials & Construction's market position and vertical integration to increase earnings and cash flow; and
Monetizing development-for-sale pipeline and related investments,
Monetizing the Company's other landholdings and
Exploring the potential monetization of non-core operating businesses in both the Land Operations and Materials & Construction segments.
Continuing to practice disciplined and prudent financial management and capital allocation to maintain balance sheet strength and financial flexibility.
Key strategic activities and initiatives by segment are discussed below.
Commercial Real Estate Strategy
OurThe Company's commercial real estate strategy focuses on Hawai`Hawai‘i, where we benefitit benefits from the Company’sits broad experience base, deep relationships built over 147 years of operationand strong reputation in the islands, as well asislands. These attributes, and a geographic focus in Hawai‘i, uniquely position the Company to create value through the acquisition, development, redevelopment and management of commercial real estate in the state. The Company believes the Hawai‘i market is positioned for stability and growth, given the state’s positive economic performance and comparatively favorable macroeconomic indicators (e.g., median household incomes, personal income growth rates, low unemployment rates, etc.) and lack of commercially-entitled lands and robust economic performance. With a median household income nearly 30% above the U.S. national average, the lowest unemployment rate in the nation at 2.0%(i.e., solid personal income growth exceeding 3% per annum, and acomparatively low 12.1 square feetfootage of strip retail GLAgross leasable area per capita on Oahu,Oahu). Based on these factors, the Hawai`Hawai‘i retail market compares favorably with other top-tier retail markets in the U.S. Similarly, given the severe shortage of industrial land supply in Hawai`Hawai‘i, industrial market rents and per square foot values exceed those achieved in other U.S. markets, making Hawai`Hawai‘i a high-performing industrial market, despite its geographic isolation. In addition to strong resident demographics and market fundamentals, the Hawai`Hawai‘i commercial real estate market is supported by a growing and resilient tourism industry, as well as consistently high levels of government spending due to Hawai`i’sHawai‘i's strategic defense location between the continental U.S. and Asia. Therefore, as a result of the Company's Migration Strategy,in 2018, not only have ourthe Company's assets been concentrated where management is best able to enhance portfolio performance, but the overall asset quality of ourthe Company's portfolio has significantly improved.
To further enhance asset quality and increase the recurring income stream from ourits commercial portfolio, the Company intends to:
GrowIncrease income and optimize returns on A&B’sits commercial portfolio by:
Developing new properties for hold and redevelop properties that provide an appropriate risk adjusted return on capital invested and are accretive to the Company’s value;

2



Being the landlord of choice by providing desirable locations, quality properties, landlord services and community amenities;amenities,
Leveraging internal property management and leasing to efficiently manage operations and maximize cash returns;returns,
Executing effective marketing and leasing strategies that attract quality tenants in the marketplace and new tenants to Hawai`Hawai‘i by leveraging ourits position as the largest owner of grocery/drug anchored shopping centers in Hawai`i;Hawai‘i,


Investing in the repositioning and redevelopment of existing assets at an appropriate risk-adjusted return on capital,
Developing new commercial properties at an appropriate risk adjusted return on capital and
Selectively acquire retail and industrial properties within desirable Hawaiianacquiring commercial real estate assets in Hawai‘i markets at returns that exceed the Company’s risk adjustedrisk-adjusted cost of capital.
Evaluate other commercial property investment opportunities, such as leased fee assets or other commercial real estate types, when the acquisitions are strategically consistent with the value creation objectives of the Company.
Complete the Migration Strategy primarily through the sale of mainland assets and tax efficient reinvestment of proceeds into strategically appropriate commercial real estate assets in Hawai`i.
Land Operations Strategy
A&BThe Company strives to maximize value infrom its historical landholdings as it seeks to transition to a commercial real estate-focused company. For its landholdings by employing land at its highestdesignated for current or future urban development and best use, to the benefit of shareholders, employees, its communities and other key stakeholder groups. Certain lands owned by the Company are designated for urban uses or for future urban uses and are in various stages of entitlement. For those lands, we intend to continue the entitlement processes and pursue eitherexplores development of commercial real estate assets for ourits own portfolio or monetization over time through sales of land or developed properties. In pursuit of these objectives, the Company intends to:
Actively market and sell available development inventory;
Entitle certain Hawai`i lands to respond(in response to market demand while meeting community needs;needs) or seeks monetization of such land and related investments (including current for-sale projects) earlier in their development cycle.
MonetizeThe Company also owns land that is not designated for development assets when appropriate to manage risk and return;
Undertake opportunistic development of fully entitled land while limiting investment risk and capital commitment through joint venture structures and selective monetization;
Emphasize short-term developments as compared(e.g., agricultural lands, conservation/watershed lands). Consistent with the Company’s historical long-term, master-planned community approach; and
Maintain a disciplined approach to risk management that includes careful assessment of market conditions/risks, prudent structuring of transactions, and maintaining fiscal discipline.
For a significant portion of A&B’s substantial Hawai`i landholdings,its simplification strategy, the Company employs a wide spectrumis pursuing monetization of non-development uses, ranging from conservation/watershedthese assets through transactions eligible for tax-efficient reinvestment. When timely monetization, in line with its simplification strategy, is not feasible, the Company continues to pasture to active farming. While a majority of A&B’s landholdings has limited or no long-term urban development potential, these landholdings remain valuable for farming and other uses, such as providing access to natural resources or hydro-electric generation capability. To employ these landholdings at their highest and best use the Company intends to:
Operate and maintain infrastructure, including roads, irrigation ditches and power distribution systems, among others;
Pursue select diversified agricultural operations;
Lease land to diversified agricultural producers;
Advance crop, livestock and bioenergy initiatives through trials to commercial operations, as merited; and
Maintain access to irrigation water to support current and future diversified agriculturelegacy business activities.
Materials & Construction Strategy
TheActivities in the Materials & Construction segment of A&B is principally comprised of itsare primarily conducted through the Company's consolidated subsidiary, Grace Pacific, LLC (“GP”). GP is a diversified and vertically integrated construction materials and hot mix asphalt paving contractor based in Kapolei, Hawai`i with operations throughout the Hawaiian Islands. The majority of GP’s paving operations serves public sector clients at the Federal, State and County/Municipal levels. GP owns six hot-mix asphalt plants throughout the state that primarily support its internal paving operations, and third-party customers. GPGrace Pacific also, owns and operates a rock quarry and processing plant in Makakilo, Hawai`i that is strategically located on the west side of Oahu. Due to the high cost of transporting aggregate and the limited shelf life of asphaltic concrete once it is produced, GP’s Makakilo quarry and hot mix plant are ideally located to service Oahu’s growth areas.
GP’s vertically integrated production model includes ownership of an import terminal for liquid asphalt and sand. These additional resources ensure GP’s access to raw materials and enable it to compete cost effectively. In addition, GPthrough consolidated subsidiaries, offers a variety of related for-sale and for-rent services, including temporaryroad safety and permanent roadway traffic control (GP Roadway

3



Solutions), Microguard HVACtransportation construction services, and tile coatings (GP Maintenance Solutions), custom signage (Peterson Sign Company), unistrut (Unistrut Hawai`i), and structuralserves as Hawai‘i's only precast/prestressed concrete (GPRM Prestress). GP isbuilding materials manufacturer. Grace Pacific also holds a 50% owner ofinterest in an unconsolidated affiliate, Maui Paving, LLC ("Maui Paving"), which operates primarily on the island of Maui.
GPConsistent with its simplification strategy to focus on the growth and expansion of its commercial real estate portfolio in Hawai‘i, the Company continues to actively explore options involving the sale of some or all of the Grace Pacific businesses. No timeline has undergone a reviewbeen established for the completion of these options.
Additional activity in the M&C segment includes its share of the results of operations overof an unconsolidated investment, Pohaku Pa‘a LLC ("Pohaku"). Pohaku is composed of two wholly-owned subsidiaries, HC&D, LLC (formerly known as Ameron Hawaii, LLC) and Island Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. Pohaku, through these wholly-owned subsidiaries, operates rock quarries on the past year,islands of Oahu and certain improvements were identifiedMaui and sells a wide range of products that are to be implemented in 2018.
Major initiatives for GP include the following:
Enhancing sales efforts to increase the volume of third party aggregate sales, taking advantage of the availability of high quality materialsready-mix concrete, rock and the strategic location of the quarry;
Optimizing labor management to reduce the variable costs of paving operations;
Implementing state of the art information systems to improve cost managementsand aggregates and contract bidding;cultured stone and
Positioning the Company for the anticipated increases in State and Federal contracts later in 2018. related products.
Financial Strategy
The Company values a strong balance sheet with levels of debt and repayment schedules that would enable it to protect its ownership of assets through market cycles and to provide capital for opportunities to invest at attractive risk-adjusted returns. Following the increase in debt necessitated by the 2018 REIT special distribution, the Company continues to pursue debt reduction through non-core asset monetization and cash flow from operating activities. A decline in Materials and Construction earnings has impeded this progress, but monetization efforts in 2019 facilitated progress in debt reduction.
To maintainachieve this desired balance sheet posture, the Company intends to:
Target a 5x to 6x net debt to EBITDA ratio;
Ensure well-laddered debt maturities and minimize near term maturing debt;
Maintain a high proportion of fixed-rate debt and longer weighted-average maturity;
Maintain a large unencumbered portfolio of assets; and
Maintain a disciplined capital allocation strategy with a focus on investments that have attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to the Company’s internal cost of capital.capital;

Continue to improve leverage metrics through earnings growth and debt reduction;
Ensure well-laddered debt maturities and minimize near-term maturing debt;
Maintain a high proportion of fixed-rate debt and a longer weighted-average maturity; and
Maintain a large unencumbered portfolio of assets.
Throughout this annual report on Form 10-K, references to "we," "our," "us" and "our Company" refer to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS
A.Commercial Real Estate Segment
AThe following table presents a summary of GLA and Cash NOI percentagesquare footage ("SF") by geographic location andimproved property type as of December 31, 2017 is as follows:
 Current GLA (sq. ft.)
 Hawai`i Mainland Total
Retail1,814,800
 186,400
 2,001,200
Industrial961,500
 396,100
 1,357,600
Office190,900
 464,100
 655,000
Total2,967,200
 1,046,600
 4,013,800
2019:
($ in thousands)
Cash NOI by Geography and Type1
 
Cash NOI as a % of Total Cash NOI1
 Hawai`i Mainland Total Hawai`i Mainland Total
Retail$45,729
 $2,255
 $47,984
 53.9% 2.7% 56.6%
Industrial12,032
 4,455
 16,487
 14.2% 5.2% 19.4%
Office4,368
 4,142
 8,510
 5.1% 4.9% 10.0%
Ground11,835
 
 11,835
 14.0% —% 14.0%
Total$73,964
 $10,852
 $84,816
 87.2% 12.8% 100.0%
1   Refer to page 45 for a discussion of management's use of a non-GAAP financial measure and the required reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures.
Current GLA (SF)
Retail2,497,500
Industrial1,216,800
Office143,600
Total3,857,900

4



(1)Hawai`i Commercial Properties
A&B’s Hawai`iimproved commercial real estate portfolio consists of retail, industrial and office properties, comprising approximately 3.03.9 million square feet of GLA as of December 31, 2017.2019. Most of the commercial properties are located on Oahu and Maui, with smaller holdings on Kauai and the Island of Hawai`i.Hawai‘i (island). The occupancy for the Hawai`i portfolio (i.e., the percentage of square footage leased and commenced to gross leasable space at the end of the period reported, "Occupancy") was 93.5 percent93.9% and 93.4 percent as92.4% at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. For properties in the portfolio, annualized base rent ("ABR") is calculated by multiplying the current month's contractual base rent by twelve.


As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Hawai`i2019, the Company's commercial properties owned as of December 31, 2017real estate improved property assets were as follows:follows ($ in thousands, except per square foot, "PSF," amounts):
Property IslandYear Built/
Renovated
Current
GLA
(sq. ft.)
OccupancyABR
($ in 000s)
ABR
PSF
Property IslandYear Built/
Renovated
Current
GLA (SF)
OccupancyABRABR
PSF
Retail:    Retail:    
1Pearl Highlands Center*Oahu1992-1994411,300
90.2%$8,769
$23.98
Pearl Highlands Center(1)Oahu1992-1994411,400
99.8 %$11,236
$27.38
2Kailua Retail*Oahu1947-2014319,000
97.7%9,875
32.24
Kailua Retail(1)(3)Oahu1947-2014319,100
96.5 %11,251
36.81
3Waianae Mall*Oahu1975170,300
85.5%2,869
19.70
Laulani Village
Oahu 2012175,800
99.3 %6,415
37.09
4Manoa Marketplace
Oahu1977140,200
94.9%4,607
34.84
Waianae Mall(1)Oahu 1975170,300
87.0 %3,068
20.72
5Kaneohe Bay Shopping Center (Leasehold)*Oahu1971125,400
100.0%2,953
23.55
Manoa Marketplace(1)Oahu 1977140,900
85.2 %3,922
33.14
6Waipio Shopping Center*Oahu1986, 2004113,800
98.3%3,207
28.66
Queens' MarketPlace
Hawai‘i Island 2007134,700
90.1 %5,426
53.71
7Aikahi Park Shopping Center*Oahu197198,000
78.8%1,305
16.90
Kaneohe Bay Shopping Center (Leasehold)(1)Oahu 1971125,400
100.0 %3,125
24.92
8The Shops at Kukui'ula*Kauai200989,100
96.9%4,247
51.32
Pu‘unene Shopping Center
Maui2017120,500
64.6 %3,284
46.35
9Lanihau Marketplace*Hawai`i
Island
198788,300
100.0%1,887
21.37
Hokulei Village
Kauai 2015119,200
98.2 %4,093
35.23
10Kunia Shopping Center*Oahu200460,600
94.1%2,059
39.33
Waipio Shopping Center(1)Oahu1986, 2004113,800
100.0 %3,303
29.02
11Kahului Shopping Center*Maui195149,900
96.6%458
10.39
Aikahi Park Shopping Center(1)Oahu 197198,000
82.1 %1,951
24.49
12Napili Plaza*Maui199145,600
88.4%1,173
29.75
Lanihau Marketplace(1)Hawai‘i Island 198788,300
94.6 %1,747
20.90
13Lahaina Square*Maui197344,800
82.6%662
17.90
The Shops at Kukui‘ula(1)Kauai 200986,100
93.0 %4,121
54.70
14Gateway at Mililani Mauka*Oahu2008, 201334,900
97.7%1,675
52.39
Kunia Shopping Center(1)Oahu 200460,600
95.0 %2,345
40.74
15Port Allen Marina Center*Kauai200223,600
92.0%534
24.64
Waipouli Town Center
Kauai 198056,600
 93.9 %948
17.84
Subtotal – Retail 1,814,800
93.1%$46,280
$27.85
    
Industrial:    
16Komohana Industrial Park*Oahu1990238,300
100.0%$2,833
$11.89
Lau Hala Shops(3)Oahu 201846,300
100.0 %2,652
57.32
17Kaka'ako Commerce Center*Oahu1969197,400
85.2%2,444
14.53
Napili Plaza(1)Maui 199145,600
87.6 %1,221
30.56
18Waipio Industrial*Oahu1988-1989158,400
99.5%2,441
15.49
Kahului Shopping Center(1)Maui 195145,300
93.6 %672
15.83
19P&L Warehouse*Maui1970104,100
94.0%1,340
13.69
Gateway at Mililani Mauka(1)Oahu2008, 201334,900
93.2 %1,825
56.19
20Honokohau Industrial
Hawai`i
Island
2004-2006, 200877,300
93.2%992
13.77
Port Allen Marina Center(1)Kauai200223,600
92.0 %591
27.27
21Kailua Industrial/Other*Oahu1951-197468,800
96.3%952
14.80
The Collection
Oahu201712,000
100.0 %559
46.64
22Port Allen*Kauai1983, 199363,800
100.0%674
10.56
Ho‘okele Shopping Center(2)Maui201969,100
N/A

23Harbor Industrial*Maui193053,400
94.1%156
11.92
Subtotal – Industrial 961,500
95.1%$11,832
$13.52
Subtotal – Retail 2,497,500
93.3%$73,755
$33.12
        
Office:    Industrial:    
23Komohana Industrial Park(1)Oahu 1990238,300
87.0 %$2,669
$12.87
24Kahului Office Building*Maui197459,400
86.8%$1,429
$29.06
Kaka‘ako Commerce Center(1)Oahu 1969201,100
93.3 %2,544
14.40
25Gateway at Mililani Mauka South
Oahu1992, 200637,100
100.0%1,605
43.21
Waipio Industrial(1)Oahu1988-1989158,400
98.8 %2,514
16.07
26Kahului Office Center*Maui199133,400
81.6%709
25.99
Opule Industrial
Oahu2005-2006, 2018151,500
100.0 %2,320
15.31
27Stangenwald Building*Oahu1901, 198027,100
87.7%446
19.24
P&L Warehouse(1)Maui 1970104,100
100.0 %1,492
14.53
28Judd Building*Oahu1898, 197920,200
86.4%323
18.49
Kapolei Enterprise Center
Oahu 201993,000
100.0 %1,507
16.19
29Lono Center*Maui197313,700
94.8%313
24.17
Honokohau Industrial(1)Hawai‘i Island2004-2006, 200886,500
100.0 %1,197
13.84
30Kailua Industrial/Other(1)Oahu1951-197469,000
93.4 %1,116
17.85
31Port Allen(1)Kauai1983, 199363,800
100.0 %739
11.58
32Harbor Industrial(1)Maui193051,100
87.2 %538
12.08
Subtotal – Office 190,900
89.1%$4,825
$28.86
Subtotal – Industrial 1,216,800
95.3%$16,636
$14.53
Total – Hawai`i Portfolio 2,967,200
93.5%$62,937
$23.27
    
* Included in Same-Store portfolio.

5



 Property IslandYear Built/
Renovated
Current
GLA (SF)
OccupancyABRABR
PSF
 Office:       
33Kahului Office Building(1)Maui197459,400
87.4%$1,496
$30.44
34Gateway at Mililani Mauka South(1)Oahu1992, 200637,100
100.0 %1,641
44.18
35Kahului Office Center(1)Maui199133,400
87.7%765
26.09
36Lono Center(1)Maui197313,700
88.9%305
25.10
 Subtotal – Office   143,600
90.9%$4,207
$32.93
 Total – Hawai‘i Improved Portfolio 3,857,900
93.9%$94,598
$27.03
         
(1) Included in the same-store ("Same-Store") pool, which management uses in the calculation of certain non-GAAP metrics at an improved property or ground lease level. Refer to page 38 for a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures and the required reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures.
(2) Development completed but not yet stabilized. Upon initial stabilization the property will be included in occupancy. Refer to page 39 for a discussion of management's determination of stabilization.
(3) In prior periods, Lau Hala Shops was combined into Kailua Retail. However, beginning in the year ended December 31, 2019, information for Lau Hala is presented separately and has been excluded from Kailua Retail.
A&BThe Company also has a portfolio of commercial ground leases as ofat December 31, 2017,2019, as follows:follows ($ in thousands):
Ground
Leases (a)
 Location
(City, Island)
AcresProperty TypeExp. YearNext Rent StepStep Type
ABR
($ in 000s)
#1*Kaneohe, Oahu15.4Grocery-Anchored Retail20352023FMV Reset$2,800
#2*Honolulu, Oahu2.8Grocery-Anchored Retail20402020FMV Reset1,344
#3*Wailuku, Maui5.3Medical Office2021  819
#4*Kailua, Oahu3.4Grocery-Anchored Retail20622022Fixed Step753
#5*Puunene, Maui52.0Heavy Industrial20342019Fixed Step751
#6*Kaneohe, Oahu3.7Retail2020 OptionFMV Reset694
#7*Kailua, Oahu1.6Retail Month-to-Month 565
#8*Kailua, Oahu2.2Retail20622022Fixed Step485
#9*Honolulu, Oahu0.5Parking2018  270
#10*Honolulu, Oahu0.5Retail20282018 Fixed Step252
#11*Kailua, Oahu1.2Retail2022  237
#12*Kahului, Maui0.8Retail20262018Fixed Step228
#13*Kahului, Maui0.4Office20202018 Fixed Step201
#14*Kailua, Oahu3.3Office20372022 FMV Reset200
#15*Kahului, Maui0.8Industrial20202018Fixed Step183
#16*Kailua, Oahu0.9Retail20332019FMV Reset181
#17*Kahului, Maui0.5Retail20292018Fixed Step163
#18*Kahului, Maui0.4Retail20272022 Fixed Step158
#19*Kailua, Oahu0.4Retail20222018 Fixed Step130
#20*Kailua, Oahu1.7Retail2019  130
Remainder*Various19.0VariousVariousVariousVarious1,441
Total - Hawai`i Ground Leases116.8    $11,985
         
(a) Excludes intersegment ground leases, primarily from our Materials & Construction segment, which are eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.
* Included in Same-Store portfolio.
 Property Name (1)Location
(City, Island)
AcresProperty TypeExp. YearCurrent ABR
1Windward City Shopping CenterKaneohe, Oahu15.4Retail2035$2,800
2Owner/OperatorKapolei, Oahu36.4Industrial20252,271
3Owner/OperatorHonolulu, Oahu9.0Retail20451,886
4Kaimuki Shopping CenterHonolulu, Oahu2.8Retail20401,344
5S&F IndustrialPu‘unene, Maui52.0Heavy Industrial20591,275
6Owner/OperatorKaneohe, Oahu3.7Retail2048990
7Windward Town and Country Plaza IKailua, Oahu3.4Retail2062753
8Windward Town and Country Plaza IIKailua, Oahu2.2Retail2062485
9Owner/OperatorKailua, Oahu1.9Retail2034450
10Owner/OperatorHonolulu, Oahu0.5Retail2028348
11Owner/OperatorHonolulu, Oahu0.5Parking2023319
12Pali Palms PlazaKailua, Oahu3.3Office2037257
13Seven-Eleven Kailua CenterKailua, Oahu0.9Retail2033243
14Owner/OperatorKahului, Maui0.8Retail2026242
15Owner/OperatorKailua, Oahu1.2Retail2022237
16Owner/OperatorKahului, Maui0.4Retail2020214
17Owner/OperatorKahului, Maui0.8Industrial2020200
18Owner/OperatorKahului, Maui0.5Retail2029173
19Owner/OperatorKahului, Maui0.4Retail2027158
20Owner/OperatorKailua, Oahu0.4Retail2022151
 RemainderVarious17.3VariousVarious1,336
 Total - Ground Leases153.8  $16,132
       
(1) Excludes intersegment ground leases, primarily from our Materials & Construction segment, which are eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.




6



(2)U.S. Mainland Commercial Properties
On the Mainland, A&B owns a portfolio of six commercial properties, acquired primarily by way of tax-deferred, §1031 exchanges and consisting of retail, industrial and office properties, comprising approximately 1.0 million square feet of leasable space as of December 31, 2017. The occupancy for the Mainland portfolio was 94.1 percent and 90.4 percent as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
A&B’s Mainland commercial properties owned as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
 Property City/StateYear Built/
Renovated
Current
GLA
(sq. ft.)
OccupancyABR
($ in 000s)
ABR
PSF
 Retail:       
1Little Cottonwood Center*Sandy, UT1998, 2008141,500
95.9%$1,591
$11.73
2Royal MacArthur Center*Dallas, TX200644,900
100.0%1,109
25.61
 Subtotal – Retail   186,400
96.9%$2,700
$15.09
         
 Industrial:       
3Sparks Business Center*Sparks, NV1996-1998396,100
100.0%2,320
6.00
 Subtotal – Industrial   396,100
100.0%$2,320
$6.00
         
 Office:       
41800 and 1820 Preston Park*Plano, TX1997-1998198,800
88.0%$3,483
$20.20
5Concorde Commerce Center (a)*Phoenix, AZ1998138,700
91.1%2,641
20.96
6Deer Valley Financial Center (b)*Phoenix, AZ2001126,600
84.6%1,434
18.75
 Subtotal – Office   464,100
88.0%7,558
20.16
 Total - Mainland Portfolio   1,046,600
94.1%$12,578
$13.38
         
 (a) This property was subsequently sold in January 2018 for $9.5 million.
 (b) This property was subsequently sold in February 2018 for $15.0 million.
 * Included in Same-Store portfolio
(3)    Tenant Concentrations
A&B’sThe Company’s top ten tenants as of at December 31, 20172019 (ranked by ABR) were as follows:follows ($ in thousands):
Tenant (a)ABR
($ in 000s)
 % of Total
Portfolio
ABR
 
GLA
(sq. ft.)
 % of Total
Portfolio
GLA
Tenant1
 Number of Leases ABR % of Total Improved
Portfolio
ABR
 GLA (SF) % of Total
Improved Portfolio
GLA
Albertsons Companies (including Safeway) 7 $6,853
 7.2% 286,024 7.4%
Sam's Club$3,308
 4.4% 180,908
 4.5% 1 3,308
 3.5% 180,908 4.7%
CVS Corporation (including Longs Drugs)2,623
 3.5% 150,411
 3.7% 6 2,752
 2.9% 150,411 3.9%
United Healthcare Services2,270
 3.0% 108,100
 2.7%
Foodland Supermarket & related companies1,858
 2.5% 112,929
 2.8% 10 2,608
 2.8% 146,901 3.8%
Ross Dress for Less 2 1,992
 2.1% 65,484 1.7%
Coleman World Group 2 1,780
 1.9% 115,495 3.0%
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics, & Fragrance, Inc. 3 1,508
 1.6% 33,985 0.9%
24 Hour Fitness USA1,375
 1.8% 45,870
 1.1% 1 1,375
 1.5% 45,870 1.2%
Albertsons Companies (including Safeway)1,316
 1.7% 168,621
 4.2%
Petco Animal Supplies Stores 3 1,316
 1.3% 34,282 0.9%
Whole Foods Market1,210
 1.6% 31,647
 0.8% 1 1,210
 1.3% 31,647 0.8%
Office Depot1,138
 1.5% 75,824
 1.9%
Ross Dress for Less890
 1.2% 35,308
 0.9%
Liberty Dialysis Hawai`i842
 1.1% 23,271
 0.6%
Total$16,830
 22.3% 932,889
 23.2% 36 $24,702
 26.1% 1,091,007 28.3%
       
(a) Excludes intersegment ground leases, primarily from our Materials & Construction segment, which are eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.
1 Excludes intersegment ground leases, primarily from the Materials & Construction segment, which are eliminated in our consolidated results of operation.
1 Excludes intersegment ground leases, primarily from the Materials & Construction segment, which are eliminated in our consolidated results of operation.




7



(4)(3)Lease Expirations
The Company’s schedule of lease expirations for its total improved portfolio is as follows:follows ($ in thousands):
Expiration YearNumber
of Leases
 Square
Footage of
Expiring Leases
 % of Total
Portfolio
Leased GLA
 
ABR
Expiring
($ in 000s)
 % of Total
Portfolio
Expiring ABR
 Number
of Leases
 Square
Footage of
Expiring Leases
 % of Total
Improved Portfolio
Leased GLA
 ABR
Expiring
 % of Total
Improved Portfolio
Expiring ABR
2018154 530,808
 14.1% $9,523
 11.6%
2019152 634,441
 16.9% 12,279
 14.9%
2020143 493,356
 13.2% 11,297
 13.7% 147 469,191 13.2% $10,434
 10.0%
2021101 477,561
 12.7% 11,196
 13.6% 161 600,189 16.9% 15,040
 14.4%
2022102 333,549
 8.9% 9,498
 11.6% 169 399,427 11.2% 13,000
 12.5%
202344 225,549
 6.0% 4,796
 5.8% 114 266,212 7.5% 9,046
 8.7%
202416 180,876
 4.8% 4,617
 5.6% 78 436,011 12.3% 12,462
 11.9%
202520 58,050
 1.5% 2,263
 2.8% 30 153,365 4.3% 4,864
 4.7%
202613 43,546
 1.2% 1,918
 2.3% 21 179,077 5.0% 4,663
 4.5%
202713 135,756
 3.6% 3,370
 4.1% 24 155,882 4.4% 4,679
 4.5%
2028 37 237,143 6.7% 9,737
 9.3%
Thereafter19 273,323
 7.2% 5,574
 6.9% 52 541,899 15.2% 17,452
 16.7%
Month-to-month131 371,021
 9.9% 5,847
 7.1% 96 117,934 3.3% 2,935
 2.8%
Total908 3,757,836
 100.0% $82,178
 100.0% 929 3,556,330 100% $104,312
 100%
B.    Land Operations Segment
A&B'sThe Company's Land Operations segment creates value through actively managing and deployingseeks to strategically monetize the Company's landlegacy, non-commercial real estate landholdings and real estate-related assets to their highest and best use. Primary activities of the Land Operations segment include leasing agricultural land, planning, zoning, financing, constructing, purchasing, managing, selling, and investing in real property; renewable energy; and diversified agribusiness.assets.

8





(1)    Landholdings
As ofAt December 31, 2017,2019, A&B andowned 27,925 acres related to its subsidiaries owned 86,315 acres, consisting of 86,234 acres in Hawai`i and 81 acres on the U.S. MainlandLand Operations segment as follows:
TypeSegmentMauiKauaiOahuMolokaiHawai`i IslandTotal
Hawai`i
Acres
MainlandTotal Acres
Land under commercial properties/ urban ground leasesCRE96
19
184

15
314
81
395
Land in active development         
Development for saleLand Operations106

4


110

110
Development for holdCRE9




9

9
OtherLand Operations81




81

81
Subtotal - Land in active development 196

4


200

200
Land used in other operationsLand Operations22
20



42

42
Urban land, not in active development/use         
Developable, with full or partial infrastructureLand Operations149
7



156

156
Developable, with limited or no infrastructureLand Operations186
28



214

214
OtherLand Operations13
7



20

20
Subtotal - Urban land, not in active development 348
42



390

390
Agriculture-related         
AgricultureLand Operations47,769
6,358
75


54,202

54,202
In urban entitlement processLand Operations357
260



617

617
Conservation & preservationLand Operations15,845
13,309
509


29,663

29,663
Subtotal - Agriculture-related 63,971
19,927
584


84,482

84,482
Materials & ConstructionM&C1

541
264

806

806
Total Landholdings 64,634
20,008
1,313
264
15
86,234
81
86,315
TypeKauaiMauiOahuTotal Acres
Land used in other operations20
21

41
Urban land, not in active development/use   

Urban Developable, with full or partial infrastructure6
110

116
Urban Developable, with limited or no infrastructure29
186

215
Urban Other6
23

29
Subtotal - Urban land, not in active development41
319

360
Agriculture-related   

Agriculture/Other6,358
6,264
75
12,697
Urban entitlement process260
357

617
Conservation & preservation13,309
392
509
14,210
Subtotal - Agriculture-related19,927
7,013
584
27,524
Total Land Operations Landholdings19,988
7,353
584
27,925
The table above does not include 985acres under joint venture development that are shown below:
Joint Venture Projects Original Acres Acres at December 31, 2017
Kukui'ula (Kauai, HI) 1,010
 895
California joint ventures 75
 75
Ka Milo (Big Island, HI) 31
 8
Keala o Wailea (Maui, HI) 7
 7
The Collection (Oahu, HI) 3
 
Total 1,126
 985
An additional 1,068 acres on Maui, Kauai and Oahu are leased from third parties and are not included in any of the tables.



9



Land Designation and Water:
On Maui, the Company owns over 47,000 acres of agricultural land. Nearly 32,000 acres of these working lands, formerly farmed in sugar, have been classified by the Company as core agricultural landholdings and are being transitioned to diversified agricultural uses. This transition is expected to occur over a multi-year period.
On Kauai, approximately 3,000 acres are cultivated in coffee by Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, Inc. on land leased from A&B. Additional acreage is leased to third-party operators, with uses ranging from seed corn cultivation to pasture land and includes sites for renewable energy generating facilities.
The Hawai`i Legislature, in 2005, passed Important Agricultural Lands (“IAL”) legislation to fulfill the State's constitutional mandate to protect agricultural lands, promote diversified agriculture, increase the state’s agricultural self-sufficiency, and assure the long-term availability of agriculturally suitable lands. In 2008, the Legislature passed a package of incentives, which was necessary to trigger the IAL system of land designation. In 2009, A&B received approval from the State Land Use Commission for the designation of over 27,000 acres on Maui and over 3,700 acres on Kauai as IAL. These designations were the result of voluntary petitions filed by A&B.    
A&B holds rights to an irrigation system in West Maui, which provided approximately 13 percent of the irrigation water used by HC&S during the last ten years of its operations. A&B also owns approximately 15,000 acres of watershed lands in East Maui, which supply a portion of the irrigation water used to irrigate the core agricultural lands owned by the Company in central Maui. A&B also held four water licenses to another 30,000 acres owned by the State of Hawai`i in East Maui which, during the last ten years of its operations, have supplied approximately 56 percent of the irrigation water used by HC&S. The last of these water license agreements expired in 1986, and all four agreements were then extended as revocable permits that were renewed annually. For information regarding legal proceedings involving A&B’s irrigation systems, see “Legal Proceedings” below.    
Planning and Zoning:
The entitlement process for development of property in Hawai`i is complex (involving numerous State and County regulatory approvals), lengthy (spanning multiple years) and costly (requiring significant expenditures for the preparation of studies and applications for approval). For example, conversion of an agriculturally-zoned parcel usually requires the following approvals:
County amendment of the County Community/General Plan to reflect intended use;
State Land Use Commission approval to reclassify the parcel from the Agricultural district to the Urban district;
County approval to rezone the property to the precise land use desired.
The entitlement process is complicated by the conditions, restrictions and exactions that are placed on these approvals, including, among others, requirements to construct infrastructure improvements, payment of impact fees, restrictions on the permitted uses of the land, requirements to provide affordable housing and required phased development of projects.
A&B actively works with regulatory agencies, commissions and legislative bodies at various levels of government to obtain zoning reclassification of land to its highest and best use for both investment and development. A&B designates a parcel as “fully entitled” or “fully zoned” when all of the above-mentioned land use approvals have been obtained.

10



(2)Active Development-for-sale Projects
The CompanyCompany's Land Operations segment has an active development pipelinecurrent development-for-sale projects encompassing primary residential, resort residential and light industrial lots for sale acrossin Hawai‘i. This list has been reduced significantly in recent years thanks to successful monetization efforts and the State of Hawai`i.decision not to initiate new development-for-sale projects. The following is a summary of the Company’s active real estate development-for-sale portfolio as of December 31, 2017:2019:
       ($ in millions)
ProjectLocationProduct
Type
Est.
Economic
Interest
Planned
Units or
Saleable
Acres
Units/
Acres
Closed
Target
Sales Price
Range
(PSF)
Est.
Total
Project
Cost
A&B
Projected
Capital
Commitment
(JVs Only)
A&B Gross
Investment
(Life to Date)
   (a)   (b)(c)(d)
Kahala Avenue
Portfolio
Honolulu,
Oahu
Residential100%17
acres
13.3
acres
$150-$385$135
N/A
$134
The CollectionHonolulu,
Oahu
Primary
residential
 90%
+/-5%
465
units
460
units
$785$285
$54
$54
Keala o Wailea
(MF-11)
Wailea,
Maui
Resort
residential
65%
+/-5%
70
units
1
unit
$600-$1,000$67
$9
$9
Kamalani
(Increment 1)
Kihei,
Maui
Primary
residential
100%170
units
35
units
$400$64
N/A
$39
Ka Milo at
Mauna Lani
Kona,
Hawai`i
Island
Resort
residential
50%137
units
99
units
$530-$800$131
$17
$17
The Ridge at Wailea
(MF-19)
Wailea,
Maui
Resort
residential
100%5
acres
1
acre
$60-$100$10
N/A
$9
Maui Business Park
(Phase II)
Kahului,
Maui
Light
industrial
lots
100%125
acres
34
acres
$38-$60$77
N/A
$59
Kukui'ula (e)Poipu,
Kauai
Resort
residential
85%
+/- 5%
640
acres
115
acres
$40-$110$854
$318
$313
          
(a) Estimated economic interest represents the Company's estimated share of distributions after return of capital contributions based on current forecasts of sales activity. Actual results could differ materially from projected results due to the timing of expected sales, increases or decreases in estimated sales prices or costs and other factors. As a result, estimated economic interests are subject to change. Further, as it relates to certain of our joint venture projects, information disclosed herein is obtained from our joint venture partners, who maintain the books and records of the related ventures.
(b) Includes land cost at book value, including capitalized interest, but excluding sales commissions and closing costs.
(c) Includes land cost at contribution value and total expected A&B capital to be contributed. The estimate includes due diligence costs and capitalized interest, but excludes capital projected to be contributed by equity partners, third-party debt, and amounts expected to be funded from project cash flows and/or buyer deposits.
(d) The book value of active development projects includes land stated at its acquisition value. In the case of development projects on A&B's historical landholdings, such as Kamalani and Maui Business Park, the value of land would be approximately $150 per acre.
(e) In addition to the main Kukui'ula project included herein, with a book value of $303 million, the Company has investments in three other Kukui'ula-related joint ventures with a combined book value of $26 million.
  (in millions)
ProjectLocationProduct
Type
Est.
Economic
Interest
Planned
Units or
Saleable
Acres
Units/
Acres
Closed
Est.
Total
Project/
Investment
Cost
A&B Gross
Investment
(Life to Date)
Wholly Owned:       
Maui Business Park
(Phase II)
Kahului,
Maui
Light
industrial
lots
100%125
acres
44 acres$91.0
$59.0
Joint Ventures:       
Kukui‘ulaPoipu,
Kauai
Resort
residential
85% +/- 5%1,425 units221 units$1,071.0
$323.0
Other Kukui‘ula Related InvestmentsPoipu,
Kauai
Resort
residential
75% +/- 5%58 units39 units$102.0
$52.0

Kukui'ula: A&B’s largest active development project is Kukui'ula, a fully amenitized luxury resort residential master planned community in Poipu, Kauai. In April 2002, A&B entered into a joint venture with DMB Communities II (“DMBC”), an affiliate of DMB Associates, Inc. ("DMB"), an Arizona-based developer of master-planned communities, for the development of Kukui'ula on acreage that consisted of historical A&B landholdings. As of December 31, 2017, total capital contributed to the project was approximately $318 million, which included $30 million representing the value of land initially contributed by the Company. As of December 31, 2017, DMB has contributed approximately $195 million.
Various vertical construction programs are being pursued at Kukui'ula in joint ventures with five third-party developers. In 2017, the joint venture recorded 15 sales of lots or homes.
Maui Business Park: Maui Business Park II (“MBP II”) represents the second phase of the Company's Maui Business Park project in Kahului, Maui. MBP II is zoned for light industrial, retail and office use. At December 31, 2019, approximately 81 acres remain available.
Kukui‘ula and Other Kukui‘ula Related Investments: In April 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture with DMB Communities II (“DMBC”), an affiliate of DMB Associates, Inc. ("DMB"), an Arizona-based developer of master-planned communities, for the development of Kukui‘ula on acreage that consisted of historical A&B landholdings. As of December 31, 2017,2019, total capital contributed to the main project was approximately 91 saleable acres remain available.$323.0 million, which included $30.0 million representing the value of land initially contributed by the Company.
Wailea: The Company's landholdings related to active,Other Kukui‘ula Related Investments includes joint venture investments in two vertical construction, development-for-sale projects in Wailea, Maui, include the following projects:
At the Keala o Wailea (MF-11) project, A&B’s 70 multi-family unit joint venture development with Armstrong Builders, sitework construction commenced in December 2015. As of December 31, 2017, 66 units were under binding contracts and closings commenced in the fourth quarter of 2017.

11



At the Ridge at Wailea (MF-19) project, 4 acres remain available for sale.
Kamalani: A&B’s Kamalani project isKukui‘ula, as well as notes receivable from a 630-unit residential project on 95 acres in Kihei, Maui. Preliminary subdivision approval was secured in April 2015. Grading and site-work on the 170-unit Increment 1 commenced in 2016. As of December 31, 2017, 35 units were closed, and 44 units were under binding contract.
Kahala Avenue Portfolio: The Kahala Avenue Portfolio, on Oahu, was acquired for $128 million in September and December 2013, primarily consisting of 30 properties totaling 17 acres in the prestigious Kahala neighborhood of East Honolulu. Through December 31, 2017, revenue from sales totaled $146.6 million. As of December 31, 2017, 13.3 acres were sold, and 3.7 acres remain available. The six available properties include three higher-value oceanfront properties representing approximately 127,000 square feet or 78% of the total square footage available for purchase.Kukui‘ula development-for-sale project.


(3)    Renewable Energy
    A&BThe Company is directly involved in the renewable energy field and has been a clean energy producer for over 114 years. It has renewable hydroelectric and solar power facilities on the island of Kauai, operated by its wholly-owned subsidiary, McBryde Resources, Inc. (“McBryde”), and has two financial investmentsinvested over $37 million in solar projects on Kauai and Oahu.

In 2017, McBryde produced 27,01926,572 MWH of hydroelectric power (compared with 28,099to 25,753 MWH in 2016)2018) and 11,05611,122 MWH of solar power from its Port Allen Solar Facility (compared with 10,700to 11,203 MWH in 2016)2018). To the extent it is not used in A&B-related operations, McBryde sells electricity to Kauai Island Utility Cooperative (“KIUC”). Power sales in 20172019 amounted to 30,86130,756 MWH (compared with 30,783to 31,800 MWH in 2016)2018).

In 2017,2019, an estimated 23% of the energy used by Kauai residents was produced through renewable energy facilities that either (1) the Company generatedoperates or invests in or (2) are located on landholdings owned by the Company that are leased by third-party energy operators. Through its own projects, investments and land leases, the Company played an important part in Kauai's recent achievement of its goal of more than 50% renewable energy generation (as announced in January 2019). Moreover, according to KIUC in a limited amountnews release, in recent months in 2019, KIUC successfully supplied all of hydroelectric power in connectionthe grid's electric needs with irrigation operations100% renewables for extended periods lasting several hours. The Company intends to support diversified agricultural activities on Maui. The power was used in A&B-related operations. No power was soldcontinue contributing additionality to Maui Electric Company in 2017, as the Company's previously-existing power purchase agreement was terminated in conjunction with the cessation of sugar operations at HC&S.

help achieve Hawai‘i's renewable energy generation goals.
C.Materials & Construction
(1)Quarries and Quarry Facilities
Grace owns 541542 acres in Makakilo, Oahu, approximately 200 acres of which are used for its quarrying operations. Approximately 750,000787,000 tons of rock were mined and processeddelivered by Grace in 2017.2019. The operation of the quarry is governed by special and conditional use permits, which allow Grace to extract aggregate through 2032. Grace also owns approximately 264 acres on Molokai, which are licensed to a third-party operator for quarrying operations.
(2)     Equipment
Grace owns approximately 525700 pieces of on- and off-highway rolling stock, which consist of heavy dutyheavy-duty trucks, passenger vehicles and various road paving, quarrying and operations equipment. Additionally, Grace owns approximately 560200 pieces of non-rolling stock items used in its operations, such as generators, transit tankers, light towers, message boards and nuclear gauges. The Materials & Construction segment has six rock crushing plants and seven asphaltic concrete plants (three on Oahu, one on Maui, one on Kauai, one on the Island of Hawai`Hawai‘i (island), and one on Molokai).
(3)    Backlog
As of December 31, 2017, total backlog, including the backlog of Grace, GPRS, GP/RM and Maui Paving, LLC, a 50-percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate, was approximately $202.1 million, compared to $242.9 million at December 31, 2016. For purposes of calculating backlog, the entire estimated revenue attributable to Grace's consolidated subsidiaries and the entire backlog of Maui Paving, which was approximately $10.6 million and $15.0 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, was included. Backlog represents the amount of revenue that Grace and Maui Paving expect to realize on contracts awarded or government contracts in which Grace Pacific has been confirmed to be the lowest bidder and formal communication of the award is deemed to be perfunctory.
The length of time that projects remain in backlog can span from a few days for a small volume of work to approximately 36 months for large paving contracts and contracts performed in phases. Backlog includes estimated revenue from the remaining portion of contracts not yet completed, as well as revenue from approved change orders.

12



Employees and Labor Relations
As of December 31, 2017, A&B2019, the Company and its subsidiaries had 836793 regular full-time employees, as compared to 808875 regular full-time employees inas of the prior year.year end. At the end of 2017,2019, the Company's Materials & Construction segment employed 591595 regular full-time employees. Approximately 53 percent53% of A&B'sthe Company's employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with unions.
The 19There are 18 bargaining unit employees at Kahului Trucking & Storage, Inc. ("KT&S&S") that are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with the ILWUInternational Longshore and Warehouse Union ("ILWU") that expires on March 31, 2018.2021. There are two collective bargaining agreements with 18 A&B Fleet Services employees on the Big IslandHawai‘i (island) and Kauai, represented by the ILWU.  Both the Kauai and Big IslandHawai‘i (island) agreements expire on August 31, 2020.
A collective bargaining agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers AFL-CIO, Local Union 3 (“IUOE”) covers 197168 of Grace’s employees, who are primarily classified as heavy-duty equipment operators, paving construction site workers, quarry workers, truck drivers and mechanics. The agreement expires on September 2, 2019.2024.
Collective bargaining agreements with Laborers International Union of North America Local 368 (“Laborers”) cover 201205 Grace employees. The traffic and rentals Laborers’ agreement expires on August 31, 2018;2021; the precast/prestress concrete Laborers’ agreement expires on August 31, 2019;2024; and the Laborers' agreement with fence, guardrail and sign installation workers expires on September 30, 2019.2024.
A collective bargaining agreement with the Hawai`Hawai‘i Regional Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and its Affiliated Local Unions and General Contractors Labor Association and the Building Industry Labor Association of Hawai`Hawai‘i (“Carpenters”) cover six11 Grace employees.  The Carpenters agreement expires on August 31, 2019.2024.


Available Information
A&BThe Company files reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The reports and other information filed include:include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other reports and information filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The public may read and copy any materials A&B files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding A&B and other issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
A&BThe Company makes available, free of charge, on or through its Internet website, A&B’sits annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. A&B’sThe Company’s website address is www.alexanderbaldwin.com.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
A&B’sOur business and its common stock are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Form 10-K and the Company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on information currently known, A&B believes that the following information identifies the most significant risk factors affecting A&B’s business and its common stock. However, theThe risks and uncertainties faced by A&Bour Company are not limited to those described below, nor are they listed in order of significance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may affect our business. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to A&Bus, or that itwe currently believesbelieve to be immaterial, may also materially adversely affect A&B’sour business, liquidity, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. This Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
If any of the following events occur, A&B’sour business, liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected, and the trading price of A&Bour common stock could materially decline.
Risks Related to REIT Status
Qualification as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, (“Code”as amended (the “Code”).
Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions to our operations and finances, as well as various factual determinations concerning matters and circumstances not entirely within our control.

13



There are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations of these provisions. Even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize our REIT qualification. In addition, our ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT depends, in part, on the actions of third parties, over which we have no control or only limited influence.
If we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
We have determined that we operated in compliance with the REIT requirements commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2017. Our qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various requirements concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature of our assets, the diversity of our share ownership and the amounts we distribute to our shareholders. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Although we intend to operate in a manner consistent with the REIT requirements, we cannot assure yoube certain that we will remain so qualified.
If, in any taxable year, we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to U.S. federal and state income tax (including, for the 2017 taxable year, any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, and we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income. Any resulting corporate tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders, which, in turn, could have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock. In addition, unless we are entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from re-electing REIT status for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT. However, for taxable years that begin after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates are generally entitled to a deduction equal to 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary income dividends received from a REIT, subject to certain limitations.


Our significant use of taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) may cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT.
The net income of our TRSs is not required to be transferred to us, and such TRS income that is not transferred to us is generally not subject to our REIT distribution requirements. However, if the accumulation of cash or reinvestment of significant earnings in our TRSs causes the fair market value of our securities in those entities, taken together with other non-qualifying assets, to represent more than 25% of the fair market value of our total assets, or causes the fair market value of our TRS securities alone to exceed 25% (or, for 2018 and subsequent taxable years, 20%) of the fair market value of our total assets, in each case as determined for REIT asset testing purposes, we would, absent timely responsive action, fail to qualify as a REIT.
Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to sell assets or forgo otherwise attractive investment opportunities.
To qualifymaintain our qualification as a REIT, we must continually satisfy various requirements concerning, among other things, the nature of our assets, the sources of our income and the amounts we distribute to our shareholders. For example, we must ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our total assets consists of some combination of “real estate assets” (as defined in the Code), cash, cash items and U.S. government securities. The remainder of our investments (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our total assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 25% (or, for 2018 and subsequent taxable years, 20%) of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs.TRS. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to sell assets or forgo otherwise attractive investment opportunities. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income, amounts available for distribution to our shareholders and amounts available for making payments on our indebtedness.
We may be required to borrow funds, sell assets or raise equity to satisfy our REIT distribution requirements, which could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan and grow.
We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, to qualifymaintain our qualification as a REIT. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement and qualify as a REIT but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains, we will be subject to tax at ordinary corporate tax rates on the retained portion. In addition, we will be subject

14



to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our shareholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal tax laws. We intend to make distributions to our shareholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code.Code and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% annual excise tax.
From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell assets at disadvantageous prices or distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity or adversely impact our ability to raise short- and long- term debt. Furthermore, the REIT distribution requirements may increase the financing we need to fund capital expenditures and further growth and expansion initiatives. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Whether we issue equity, at what price and the amount and other terms of any such issuances will depend on many factors, including alternative sources of capital, our then-existing leverage, our need for additional capital, market conditions and other factors beyond our control. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities or debt convertible into equity securities, the percentage of stock owned by our existing shareholders may be reduced. In addition, new equity securities or convertible debt securities could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our current shareholders, which could substantially decrease the value of our securities owned by them. Depending on the share price we are able to obtain, we may have to sell a significant number of shares to raise the capital we deem necessary to execute our long-term strategy, and our shareholders may experience dilution in the value of their shares as a result.
Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to income from “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is currently 20%., exclusive of the 3.8% investment tax surcharge. Dividends payable by


REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates applicable to qualified dividends. Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common stock. However, for taxable years that begin after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates are generally entitled to a deduction equal to 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary income dividends received from a REIT, subject to certain limitations.
The REIT ownership limitations and transfer restrictions contained in our articles of incorporation may restrict or prevent you from engaging in certain transfers of our common stock, and could have unintended antitakeover effects.effects and may not be successful in preserving our qualification for taxation as a REIT.
For us to satisfy theremain qualified for taxation as a REIT, requirements, no more than 50% inof the value of all classes or series of our outstanding shares of our stock may be owned, actuallybeneficially or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year beginning with our 2018 taxable year. In addition,Also, our capital stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year beginning with our 2018 taxable year. Among other things,In addition, a person actually or constructively owning 10% or more of the vote or value of the shares of our capital stock could lead to a level of affiliation between the Company and one or more of its tenants that could cause our revenues from such affiliated tenants to not qualify as rents from real property.
Subject to certain exceptions, our articles of incorporation generally restrict shareholdersprohibit any stockholder from owning, beneficially or constructively, more than (i) 9.8% in value of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of our capital stock or (ii) 9.8% in value or number, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. The constructive ownership rules under the Code are complex and may cause the outstanding stock owned by a group of related individuals or entities to be deemed to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% of our outstanding shares. Under applicable constructive ownership rules, anycommon stock (or the outstanding shares of stock ownedany class or series of our stock) by certain affiliated owners generally would be added together for purposesan individual or entity could cause that individual or entity, or another individual or entity, to own constructively in excess of the stockrelevant ownership limits. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our common stock, or of any of our other capital stock in violation of these restrictions, may result in the shares being automatically transferred to a charitable trust or may be void.
We refer to these restrictions collectively as the “ownership limits” and we included them in our articles of incorporation to facilitate our compliance with REIT tax rules. These ownership limitations may prevent you from engaging in certain transfers of our common stock. Even though our articles of incorporation contain the ownership limits, there can be no assurance that these provisions will be effective to prevent our qualification for taxation as a REIT from being jeopardized, including under the affiliated tenant rule. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enforce the ownership limits. If the restrictions in our articles of incorporation are not effective and, as a result, we fail to satisfy the REIT tax rules described above, then absent an applicable relief provision, we will fail to remain qualified for taxation as a REIT.
Furthermore, theThe ownership limitations and transfer restrictions contained in our articles of incorporation may delay, deter or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our shareholders. As a result, the overall effect of the ownership limitations and transfer restrictions may be to render more difficult or discourage any attempt to acquire us, even if such acquisition may be favorable to the interests of our shareholders. This potential inability to obtain a premium could reduce the price of our common stock.
Our cash distributions are not guaranteed and may fluctuate.
A REIT generally is required to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains). Generally, we expect to distribute all, or substantially all, of our REIT taxable income, including net capital gains, so as to not be subject to the income or excise tax

15



on undistributed REIT taxable income. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, will determine on a quarterly basis the amount of cash to be distributed to our shareholders based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions, tax considerations, borrowing capacity and other factors, including debt covenant restrictions, that may impose limitations on cash payments and plans for future acquisitions and divestitures. Consequently, our distribution levels may fluctuate.
Certain of our business activities may be subject to corporate level income tax and other taxes, which would reduce our cash flows, and would cause potential deferred and contingent tax liabilities.
Our TRS assets and operations will continue to be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at regular corporate rates. We also may also be subject to a variety of other taxes, including payroll taxes and state, local, and foreign income, property, transfer and


other taxes on assets and operations. In addition, we could, in certain circumstances, be required to pay an excise or penalty tax, which could be significant in amount, in order to utilize one or more relief provisions under the Code to maintain qualification for taxation as a REIT. We also could incur a 100% excise tax on transactions with a TRS, if they are not conducted on an arm’s length basis, or we also could be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not presently contemplated. Any of these taxes would decrease our earnings and our available cash.
If we dispose of an asset held at the REIT level during our first five years as a REIT and do not execute a qualifying tax-deferred exchange, we also willmay be subject to a federal and state corporate level tax on the gain recognized from such sale, up to the amount of the built-in gain that existed on January 1, 2017, which is based on the fair market value of such asset in excess of our tax basis in such asset as of January 1, 2017. We currently do not expect to sell any asset if the sale would result in the imposition of a material tax liability. We cannot, however, assure you that we will not change our plans in this regard.
In addition, the IRSInternal Revenue Service ("IRS") and any state or local tax authority may successfully assert liabilities against us for corporate income taxes for taxable years prior to the time we qualified as a REIT, in which case we will owe these taxes plus applicable interest and penalties, if any. Moreover, any increase in taxable income for these pre-REIT periods will likely result in an increase in pre-REIT accumulated earnings and profits, which could cause us to pay an additional taxable distribution to our shareholders after the relevant determination.
The tax imposed on REITs engaging in “prohibited transactions” may limit our ability to engage in transactions that would be treated as sales for federal income tax purposes.
A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. The term “prohibited transaction” generally includes a sale or other disposition of property (including mortgage loans, but other than foreclosure property, as discussed below) that is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our trade or business. We might be subject to this tax if we were to dispose of or securitize loans in a manner that was treated as a prohibited transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
We intend to conduct our operations so that no asset that we own (or are treated as owning) will be treated as, or as having been, held for sale to customers, and that a sale of any such asset will not be treated as having been in the ordinary course of our business. As a result, we may choose not to engage in certain sales of loans at the REIT level, and may limit the structures we utilize for our securitization transactions, even though the sales or structures might otherwise be beneficial to us. In addition, whether property is held “primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business” depends on the particular facts and circumstances. No assurance can be given that any property that we sell will not be treated as property held for sale to customers, or that we can comply with certain safe-harbor provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that would prevent such treatment. The 100% prohibited transaction tax does not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held through a TRS or other taxable corporation, although such income will be subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular corporate rates. We intend to structure our activities to prevent prohibited transaction characterization.

ChangesNew legislation or administrative or judicial action, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to U.S. federal and state income tax laws could materially affect us andmaintain our stockholders.

qualification as a REIT.
The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time, which could affect the U.S. federal income tax treatment of an investment in our common equity.us. The U.S. federal income tax rules dealing with REITs are constantly are under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department, which results in statutory changes as well as frequent revisions to regulations and interpretations. The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made substantial changes to the Code. Among those changes are a significant permanent reduction in the generally applicable corporate tax rate,We cannot predict how changes in the taxation of individualstax laws might affect our investors or us. Revisions in U.S. federal tax laws and other non-corporate taxpayers that generally but not universally reduce their taxes oninterpretations thereof could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a temporary basis subject to ‘‘sunset’’ provisions, the elimination or modification of various currently allowed deductions (including substantial limitations on the deductibility of interest and, in the case of individuals, the deduction for personal state

16



and local taxes), certain additional limitations on the deduction of net operating losses, and preferential rates of taxation on most ordinary REIT dividends and certain business income derived by non-corporate taxpayers in comparison to other ordinary income recognized by such taxpayers.

The effect of these, and the many other, changes made in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is highly uncertain, both in terms of their direct effect on the taxation oftax considerations relevant to an investment in our common equity and their indirect effect on the value of our assets or market conditions generally. Furthermore, many of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will require guidance through the issuance of Treasury regulations in order to assess their effect. There may be a substantial delay before such regulations are promulgated, increasing the uncertainty as to the ultimate effect of the statutory amendments on us. There may also be technical corrections legislation proposed with respect to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the effect and timing of which cannot be predicted and may be adverse to us, or could cause us to change our stockholders.

investments and commitments.
You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our stock.
Changes to the Hawai`Hawai‘i tax code could result in increased state-level taxation of REITs doing business in Hawai`Hawai‘i or mandated state-level withholding of taxes on REIT dividends.
The Hawai`Hawai‘i State legislature has recentlyrepeatedly considered, and could consider in the future, legislation that would eliminate (i.e., repeal) the REIT dividends paid deduction for Hawai`Hawai‘i State income tax purposes forrelated to income generated in Hawai`Hawai‘i for a number of years or permanently. Such a repeal could result in double taxation of REIT income in Hawai`Hawai‘i under the Hawai`Hawai‘i tax code, reduce returns to shareholders and make our stock less attractive to investors, which could in turn lower the value of our stock. The Hawai`Hawai‘i State legislature also has considered, and could consider in the future, mandating withholding of Hawai`Hawai‘i State


income tax on dividends paid to out-of-state shareholders. Such shareholders may not be able to receive a credit of these taxes from their home state, thereby resulting in double taxation of such dividends. This could reduce returns to shareholders and make our stock less attractive to investors, which could in turn lower the value or our stock.

The ability of our board of directors to revoke our REIT qualification, without shareholder approval, may cause adverse consequences to our shareholders.
Our articles of incorporation provide that the board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our anticipated REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to be a REIT, we will not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income, and we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our shareholders.
We have limited experience operating as a REIT, which may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to satisfy debt service obligations, as well as the per share trading price of our common stock.
We have begun operating in compliance with the REIT requirements for the taxable year ended December 31, 2017. Accordingly, our senior management team has limited experience operating a REIT, and we cannot assure you that our past operating experience will be sufficient to operate our company successfully as a REIT. Our limited experience operating as a REIT could, by adversely affecting our ability to remain qualified as a REIT or otherwise, adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to satisfy debt service obligations, as well as the per share trading price of our common stock.
Our articles of incorporation contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our stock, though they may not be successful in preserving our qualification for taxation as a REIT.
For us to remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, no more than 50% of the value of outstanding shares of our stock may be owned, beneficially or constructively, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year other than the first year for which we elect to be taxed as a REIT. In addition, a person actually or constructively owning 10% or more of the vote or value of the shares of our capital stock could lead to a level of affiliation between the Company and one or more of its tenants that could cause our revenues from such affiliated tenants to not qualify as rents from real property. Subject to certain exceptions, our articles of incorporation prohibit any stockholder from owning beneficially or constructively more than (i) 9.8% in value of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of our capital stock or (ii) 9.8% in value or number, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock.

17



We refer to these restrictions collectively as the “ownership limits” and we included them in our articles of incorporation to facilitate our compliance with REIT tax rules. The constructive ownership rules under the Code are complex and may cause the outstanding stock owned by a group of related individuals or entities to be deemed to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% of our outstanding common stock (or the outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock) by an individual or entity could cause that individual or entity or another individual or entity to own constructively in excess of the relevant ownership limits. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our common stock or of any of our other capital stock in violation of these restrictions may result in the shares being automatically transferred to a charitable trust or may be void. Even though our articles of incorporation contain the ownership limits, there can be no assurance that these provisions will be effective to prevent our qualification for taxation as a REIT from being jeopardized, including under the affiliated tenant rule. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enforce the ownership limits. If the restrictions in our articles of incorporation are not effective and as a result we fail to satisfy the REIT tax rules described above, then absent an applicable relief provision, we will fail to remain qualified for taxation as a REIT.
Risks Related to Our Business
Changes in economic conditions, particularly in Hawai‘i, may result in a decrease in market demand foradversely affect our real estate assets in Hawai`iCommercial Real Estate, Land Operations, and the Mainland and our materials and construction products.Materials & Construction segments.
Our business, including our assets and operations, is concentrated in Hawai`i.Hawai‘i, which exposes us to more concentrated risks than if our assets and operations were more diversely located. A weakening of economic drivers in Hawai`Hawai‘i, which include tourism, military and consumer spending, public and private construction starts and spending, personal income growth, and employment, or the weakening of consumer confidence, market demand, or economic conditions on the Mainland and elsewhere, may adversely affect the demand for or sale of Hawai`i real estate, the level of real estate leasing activity in Hawai`Hawai‘i, and on the Mainland,demand for or sale of Hawai‘i real estate, and demand for our materials and construction products. In addition, an increase in interest rates or other factors could reduce the market value of our real estate holdings, as well as increase the cost of buyer financing that may reduce the demand for our real estate assets.
We may face new or increased competition.
There are numerous other developers, buyers, managers and owners of commercial and residential real estate and undeveloped land that compete or may compete with us for management and leasing revenues, land for development, properties for acquisition and disposition, and for tenants and purchasers of properties. Intense competition could lead to increased supply of space, which could then increase vacancies, the need for increased tenant incentives, decreased rents, sales prices or sales volume, or lack of development opportunities. Additionally, our tenants may face increased competition and/or shifts in market preferences and demand that adversely impact their performance, ability to pay rent or even their business viability.
Our wholly owned subsidiary Grace Pacific LLC (“Grace” or “Grace Pacific”) competes in an industry that favors the lowest bid. Increasing competitive market conditions, including out-of-state or new in-state contractors competing for a limited number of projects available, could adversely impact our results of operations through market share erosion due to lost bids, as well as lower pricing and thus lower margins realized on successful bids. Grace also mines aggregate and imports asphalt for sale. Grace’s customers could seek alternative sources of supply, similar to some of its competitors that are importing liquid asphalt and aggregate.
Although we intend to market and sell non-strategic assets, many of the assets are relatively illiquid, and it may not be possible to dispose of such assets in a timely manner or on favorable terms, which could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
Our ability to dispose of non-strategic assets on advantageous terms, including pricing, depends on factors beyond our control, including but not limited to, competition from other sellers, insufficient infrastructure capacity or availability (e.g., water, sewer and roads) for real estate assets, the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers and market conditions. As a result, we may be unable to realize our strategy to simplify through dispositions, or may be unable to do so on advantageous terms, which could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
In addition, many of the non-strategic assets are relatively illiquid. Illiquid assets typically experience greater price volatility, as a ready market does not exist, and can be more difficult to value. In addition, validating third party pricing for illiquid assets may be more subjective than more liquid assets. As a result, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded such assets.
We may face potential difficulties in obtaining operating and development capital.
The successful execution of our strategy requires substantial amounts of operating and development capital. Sources of such capital could include banks, life insurance companies, public and private offerings of debt or equity, including rights offerings,


sale of certain assets and joint venture partners. If our credit profile deteriorates significantly, our access to the debt capital markets or our ability to renew our committed lines of credit may become restricted, the cost to borrow may increase, or we may not be able to refinance debt at the same levels or on the same terms. Further, we rely on our ability to obtain and draw on a revolving credit facility to support our operations. Volatility in the credit and financial markets or deterioration in our credit profile may prevent us from accessing funds. There is no assurance that any capital will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all, to satisfy our short or long-term cash needs.
We may raise additional capital in the future on terms that are more stringent to us, that could provide holders of new issuances rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those currently held by our common stockholders, or that could result in dilution of common stock ownership.
To execute our business strategy, we may require additional capital. If we incur additional debt or raise equity, the terms of the debt or equity issued may give the holders rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock, particularly in the event of liquidation. The terms of any new debt may also impose additional and more

18



stringent restrictions on our operations than currently in place. If we issue additional common equity, either through public or private offerings or rights offerings, your percentage ownership in us would decline if you do not participate on a ratable basis.
Failure to comply with certain restrictive financial covenants contained in our credit facilities could impose restrictions on our business segments, capital availability or the ability to pursue other activities.
Our credit facilities and term debt contain certain restrictive financial covenants. If we breach any of the covenants and such breach is not cured in a timely manner or waived by the lenders, and results in default, our access to credit may be limited or terminated and the lenders could declare any outstanding amounts immediately due and payable. We further may be limited in our ability to make distributions to our shareholders in event of default.
Increasing interest rates would increase our overall interest expense.
Interest expense on our floating-rate debt ($75.9148.7 million as of December 31, 2017)2019) would increase if interest rates rise. Additionally, the interest expense associated with fixed-rate debt could rise in future periods when the debt matures and is refinanced. Furthermore, the value of our commercial real estate portfolio and the market price of our stock could decline if market interest rates increase and investors seek alternative investments with higher distribution rates.
Our significant operating agreements and leases could be replaced on less favorable terms or may not be replaced.
Our various businesses have significant operating agreements and leases that expire at various points in the future. These agreements and leases may not be renewed or could be replaced on less favorable terms.
An increase in fuel prices may adversely affect our operating environment and costs.
Fuel prices have a direct impact on the health of the Hawai`Hawai‘i economy. Increases in the price of fuel may result in higher transportation costs to Hawai`Hawai‘i and adversely affect visitor counts and the cost of goods shipped to Hawai`Hawai‘i, thereby affecting the strength of the Hawai`Hawai‘i economy and its consumers. Increases in fuel costs also can lead to other non-recoverable, direct expense increases to us through, for example, increased costs of energy and petroleum-based raw materials used in the production of aggregate, and the manufacture, transportation, and placement of hot mix asphalt. Increases in energy costs for our leased real estate portfolio are typically recovered from lessees, although our share of energy costs increases as a result of lower occupancies, and higher operating cost reimbursements impact the ability to increase underlying rents. Rising fuel prices also may increase the cost of construction, including delivery costs to Hawai`Hawai‘i, and the cost of materials that are petroleum-based, thus affecting our real estate development projects and margins.
Noncompliance with, or changes to, federal, state or local law or regulations may adversely affect our business.
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations, including government rate, land use, environmental and tax regulations. Noncompliance with, or changes to, the laws and regulations governing our business could impose significant additional costs on us and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. For example, the real estate segments are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, which, if changed or not complied with, may adversely affect our business. We frequently utilize §1031 of the Code to defer taxes when selling qualifying real estate and reinvesting the proceeds in replacement properties. This often occurs when we sell bulk parcels of land in Hawai`Hawai‘i or commercial properties in Hawai`Hawai‘i, or on the Mainland, all of which typically have a very low tax basis. A repeal of, or adverse amendment to, §1031 of the Code, which has often been considered by Congress, could impose significant additional costs on us. We are subject to Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations, Environmental Protection Agency regulations, and state and county permits related to our operations. The Materials & Construction segment is additionally subject to Mine Safety and Health Administration regulations. The Land Operations segment is subject the Hawai`i Public Utilities Commission’s regulation of agreements between us and Hawai`i’s utilities regarding the sale of electric power, and various county, state and federal environmental laws, regulations and permits governing farming operations and generation of electricity (including, for example, the use of pesticides).


Changes to, or our violation of or inability to comply with, any of the laws, regulations and permits mentioned above could increase our operating costs or ability to operate the affected line of business.
Work stoppages or other labor disruptions by our unionized employees or those of other companies in related industries, may increase operating costs or adversely affect our ability to conduct business.
As of December 31, 2017, approximately 53 percentMany of our regular full-time employees wereare covered by collective bargaining agreements with unions. We may be adversely affected by actions taken by our employees or those of other companies in related industries against efforts by management to control labor costs, restrain wage or benefits increases or

19



modify work practices. Strikes and disruptions may occur as a result of our failure, or that of other companies in our industry, to negotiate collective bargaining agreements with such unions successfully. For example, in our Materials & Construction segment, a labor disruption resulting from a unionized workforce stoppage may significantly impede our production and ability to complete projects that are in process. Additionally, in our Land Operations segment, we may be unable to complete construction of a development-for-sale project if building materials or labor are unavailable due to labor disruptions in the relevant trade groups.
The loss of, or damage to, key vendor and customer relationships may impact our ability to conduct business and adversely affect our profitability.
Our business is dependent on our relationships with key vendors, customers and tenants. The loss of, or damage to, any of these key relationships may impact our ability to conduct business and adversely affect our profitability.
Interruption, breaches or failure of our information technology and communications systems could impair our ability to operate, adversely affect our profitabilityfinancial condition, and damage our reputation.
We are dependentrely extensively on information technology systems. All informationand communication systems to process transactions and to operate and manage our business. Information technology and communication systems are subject to reliability issues, integration and compatibility concerns, and cybersecurity-threatening intrusions. Further, we may experience failures caused by the occurrence of a natural disaster, terrorism, war, the intentional or inadvertent acts and errors by our employees or vendors, or other unanticipated problems at our facilities. Despite our implementation of security measures, there can be no assurance that our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our systems will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Any failure, or security breaches, of our systems could result in improper uses of our systems and networks and interruptions in our service or production, increased cost, lower profitabilityoperations, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, and damagereputation. We may incur significant costs to remedy damages caused by disruptions to our reputation.systems. Similarly, our vendors and tenants rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions and manage their businesses and, thus, are also at risk from, and may be impacted by, cybersecurity attacks. An interruption in the business operations of our vendors and tenants resulting from a cybersecurity attack could indirectly impact our business operations.
We are susceptible toWeather, natural disasters and the impacts of climate change may adversely affect our business.
As a result of climate change, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, including natural disasters. Should the impact of climate change be significant or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations would be adversely affected.
Our Commercial Real Estate and Land Operations segments are vulnerable to natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, fires, tornadoes and unusually heavy or prolonged rain, which could cause personal injury and loss of life. In addition, natural disasters could damage our real estate holdings, which could result in substantial repair or replacement costs to the extent not covered by insurance, a reduction in property values, or a loss of revenue, and could have an adverse effect on our ability to develop, lease and sell properties. The occurrence of natural disasters could also cause increases in property insurance rates and deductibles, which could reduce demand for, or increase the cost of, owning or developing our properties.

Drought, greater than normal rainfall, hurricanes, low-wind conditions, earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, fires, other natural disasters, agricultural pestilence, or negligence or intentional malfeasance by individuals, may also adversely impact the conditions of the land and thereby harming the prospects for the Land Operations segment, including agribusiness-related activities, our renewable energy operations, and our land infrastructure and facilities, including dams and reservoirs.
For the Materials & Construction segment, because nearly all of the segment’s activities are performed outdoors, its operations are substantially dependent on weather conditions. For example, periods of wet or other adverse weather conditions could interrupt paving activities, resulting in delayed or loss of revenue, under-utilization of crews and equipment and less efficient rates of overhead recovery. Adverse weather conditions also restrict the demand for aggregate products, increase aggregate production costs and impede its ability to efficiently transport material.


We maintain casualty insurance under policies we believe to be adequate and appropriate. These policies are generally subject to large retentions and deductibles. Some types of losses, such as losses resulting from physical damage to dams, generally are not insured. In some cases, we retain the entire risk of loss because it is not economically prudent to purchase insurance coverage or because of the perceived remoteness of the risk. Other risks are uninsured because insurance coverage may not be commercially available. Finally, we retain all risk of loss that exceeds the limits of our insurance.
HeightenedPolitical crises, public health crises and other events beyond our control may adversely impact our operations and profitability.
Political crises (including but not limited to heightened security measures, war, actual or threatened terrorist attacks, efforts to combat terrorism andor other acts of violenceviolence) and public health crises (including but not limited to pandemics and epidemics from the outbreak of any contagious diseases) may cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease, or may affect the ability or willingness of tourists to travel to Hawai‘i, thereby adversely impact our operationsaffecting Hawai‘i’s economy and profitability.
Asus. Further, as our business is concentrated in Hawai`Hawai‘i, an attack on Hawai`Hawai‘i as a result of war or terrorism may severely or irreparably harm the Company, including our real estate holdings, our facilities, andour information technology systems and our personnel.
War, geopolitical instability, terrorist attacksSuch events beyond our control could adversely affect trade and global and local economies and may lead to actions limiting trade and population movement and the movement of goods through the supply chain, as well as other acts of violenceimpacts to business and consumer demand, which may also cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease, or mayadversely affect the ability or willingnessCompany’s business, operating results and financial condition. For example, in December 2019, a strain of touristscoronavirus was reported to travelhave surfaced in Wuhan, China, resulting in a public health crisis. At this point, the extent to Hawai`i, thereby adversely affectingwhich the coronavirus may impact our results is uncertain.

20



Hawai`i’s economy and us. Future terrorist attacks could also increase the volatility in the U.S. and worldwide financial markets
Loss of our key personnel could adversely affect our business.
Our future success will depend, in significant part, upon the continued services of our key personnel, including our senior management and skilled employees. The loss of the services of key personnel could adversely affect our future operating results, because of such employee’s experience, knowledge of our business and relationships. If key employees depart, we may have to incur significant costs to replace them, and our ability to execute our business model could be impaired if we cannot replace them in a timely manner. We do not maintain key person insurance on any of our personnel.
We are subject to, and may in the future be subject to, disputes, legal or other proceedings, or government inquiries or investigations, that could have an adverse effect on us.
The nature of our business exposes us to the potential for disputes, legal or other proceedings, or government inquiries or investigations, relating to labor and employment matters, contractual disputes, personal injury and property damage, environmental matters, construction litigation, business practices, and other matters, as discussed in the other risk factors disclosed in this section. These disputes, individually or collectively, could harm our business by distracting our management from the operation of our business. If these disputes develop into proceedings, these proceedings, individually or collectively, could involve or result in significant expenditures or losses by us. As a real estate developer, we may face warranty and construction defect claims, as described below under “Risks Relating to Our Land Operations Segment.”
Changes in the value of pension assets, or a change in pension law or key assumptions, may result in increased expenses or plan contributions.
The amount of our employee pension and postretirement benefit costs and obligations are calculated on assumptions used in the relevant actuarial calculations. Adverse changes in any of these assumptions due to economic or other factors, changes in discount rates, higher health care costs, or lower actual or expected returns on plan assets, may result in increased cost or required plan contributions. In addition, a change in federal law, including changes to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation premiums, may adversely affect our single-employer pension plans and plan funding. These factors, as well as a decline in the fair value of pension plan assets, may put upward pressure on the cost of providing pension and medical benefits and may increase future pension expense and required funding contributions. Although we have actively sought to control increases in these costs, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in limiting future cost and expense increases.
Impairment in the carrying value of long-lived assets and goodwill could negatively affect our operating results.
We have a significant amount of long-lived assets and goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet and have recorded non-cash impairment charges in the past. Under generally accepted accounting principles, long-lived assets are required to be reviewed for impairment whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment. If business conditions or other factors cause profitability and cash flows to decline, we may be required to record additional non-cash impairment charges. Goodwill must be evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events indicate it is warranted. If the carrying value of our reporting units exceeds their current fair value as determined based on the discounted future cash flows


of the related business, the goodwill is considered impaired and is reduced to fair value by a non-cash charge to earnings. Events and conditions that could result in further impairment in the value of our long-lived assets and goodwill include changes in the industries in which we operate, particularly the impact of a downturn in the global or Hawai‘i economy, as well as competition and advances in technology, adverse changes in the regulatory environment, or other factors leading to reduction in expected long-term sales or profitability.
Risks Relating to Our Commercial Real Estate Segment
We are subject to a number of factors that could cause leasing rental income to decline.
We own a portfolio of commercial real estate assets. Factors that may adversely affect the portfolio’s profitability include, but are not limited to:
a significant number of our tenants are unable to meet their obligations;
increases in non-recoverable operating and ownership costs;
we are unable to lease space at our properties when the space becomes available;
the rental rates upon a renewal or a new lease are significantly lower than prior rents or do not increase sufficiently to cover increases in operating and ownership costs;
the providing of lease concessions, such as free or discounted rents and tenant improvement allowances; and
the discovery of hazardous or toxic substances, or other environmental, culturally-sensitive, or related issues at the property.
The bankruptcy or loss of key tenants in our commercial real estate portfolio may adversely affect our cash flows and profitability.
We may derive significant cash flows and earnings from certain key tenants. If one or more of these tenants declares bankruptcy or voluntarily vacates from the leased premise and we are unable to re-lease such space or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms, we may be adversely impacted. Additionally, we may be further adversely impacted by an impairment or “write-down” of intangible assets, such as lease-in-place value, favorable lease asset, or a deferred asset related to straight-line lease rent, associated with a tenant bankruptcy or vacancy.
A shift in retail shopping from brick and mortar stores to online shopping may have an adverse impact on our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
Many retailers operating brick and mortar stores have made online sales an important part of their business. Although many of the retailers operating at our properties sell groceries and other necessity-based soft goods or provide services, including entertainment and dining options, the shift to online shopping may cause declines in brick and mortar sales generated by certain of our tenants and/or may cause certain of our tenants to reduce the size or number of their retail locations in the future. As a result, our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, or re-lease space as leases expire, thereby increasing or prolonging vacancies, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
We may not be able to renew leases, lease vacant space, or re-let space as leases expire. In addition, we may need to offer substantial rent abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights, or below-market renewal options to retain existing tenants or attract new tenants. If the rental rates for our properties decrease, our existing tenants do not renew their leases, or we do not re-let our available space, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Increases in operating expenses could adversely affect our operating results.
Our operating expenses include, but are not limited to, property taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs, and the maintenance of the common areas of our commercial real estate. We may experience increases in our operating expenses, some or all of which may be out of our control. Most of our leases require that tenants pay for a share of property taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance costs. However, if any property is not fully occupied, or if recovery income from tenants is not sufficient to cover operating expenses, then we could be required to expend our own funds for operating expenses. In addition, we may be unable to renew leases or negotiate new leases with terms requiring our tenants to pay all the property tax, insurance, and common area maintenance costs that tenants currently pay, which could adversely affect our operating results.
Our retail centers may depend on anchor stores or major tenants to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of, or a store closure by, one or more of these tenants.


Some of our retail centers are anchored by large tenants. At any time, our tenants may experience a downturn in their business that may significantly weaken their financial condition. As a result, our tenants, including our anchor and other major tenants, may fail to comply with their contractual obligations to us, seek concessions in order to continue operations, or declare bankruptcy, any of which could result in the termination of such tenants’ leases and the loss of rental income attributable to the terminated leases. In addition, certain of our tenants may cease operations while continuing to pay rent, which could decrease customer traffic, thereby decreasing sales for our other tenants at the applicable retail property. In addition, mergers or consolidations among retail establishments could result in the closure of existing stores or the duplication or geographic overlapping of store locations, which could include stores at our retail centers.
Loss of, or a store closure by, an anchor store or major tenant could significantly reduce our occupancy level or the rent that we receive from our retail centers. We may be unable to re-lease vacated space or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms, or at all. In the event of default by an anchor store or major tenant, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with such parties.
Certain of our leases at our retail centers contain “co-tenancy” or “go-dark” provisions, which, if triggered, may allow tenants to pay reduced rent, cease operations, or terminate their leases, which could adversely affect our performance or the value of the applicable retail property.
Certain of the leases at our retail centers contain “co-tenancy” provisions that establish conditions related to a tenant’s obligation to remain open, the amount of rent payable by the tenant, or a tenant’s obligation to continue occupying space, including (i) the presence of a certain anchor tenant, (ii) the continued operation of an anchor tenant’s store, and (iii) minimum occupancy levels at the applicable retail center. If a co-tenancy provision is triggered by a failure of any of these conditions, a tenant could have the right to cease operations, to terminate its lease early, or to a reduction of its rent. In addition to these co-tenancy provisions, certain of the leases at our retail centers contain “go-dark” provisions that allow the tenant to cease operations while continuing to pay rent. This could result in decreased customer traffic at the applicable retail center, thereby decreasing sales for our other tenants at such retail center, which may result in our other tenants being unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges. Such provisions may also result in lower rental revenue generated under the applicable leases. To the extent co-tenancy or go-dark provisions in our leases result in lower revenue or tenant sales, tenants’ rights to terminate their leases early, or to a reduction of their rent, our performance or the value of the applicable retail center could be adversely affected.
We are subject to risks that affect the general retail environment, such as weakness in the economy, the level of consumer spending, the adverse financial condition of retailing companies, and competition from discount and internet retailers, which could adversely affect market rents for retail space and the willingness or ability of retailers to lease space in our retail center.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company owned twenty-two retail centers. The retail environment and the market for retail space could be adversely affected by weakness in the local and broader economy, the level of consumer spending and consumer confidence, the adverse financial condition of large retail companies, consolidation in the retail sector, excess amount of retail space, and increasing competition from discount retailers, outlet malls, internet retailers, and other online businesses.
Our financial results are significantly influenced by the economic growth and strength of Hawai‘i.
All of our redevelopment and development-for-hold activity, and all of our improved properties and ground leases in our commercial real estate portfolio, are in Hawai‘i. Consequently, the growth and strength of Hawai‘i’s economy has a significant impact on the demand for our real estate development projects. As a result, any adverse change to the growth or health of Hawai‘i’s economy could have an adverse effect on our commercial real estate business.
The value of our development-for-hold projects and commercial properties is affected by a number of factors.
We have significant investments in various commercial real estate properties and development-for-hold projects. Weakness in the real estate sector, especially in Hawai‘i, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing, and changes in our investment and redevelopment and development-for-hold strategy, among other factors, may affect the fair value of these real estate assets. If the undiscounted cash flows of our commercial properties, or redevelopment or development-for-hold projects, were to decline below the carrying value of those assets, we would be required to recognize an impairment loss if the fair value of those assets were below their carrying value.
We may be unable to identify and complete acquisitions of properties that meet our criteria, which may impede our growth.
Our business strategy involves the acquisition of retail, office, industrial, and other properties. These activities require us to identify suitable acquisition candidates or investment opportunities that meet our criteria. We evaluate the market of available properties and may attempt to acquire properties when strategic opportunities exist. We may be unable to acquire properties that


we have identified as potential acquisition opportunities due to various factors, including but not limited to, the inability to (i) negotiate terms agreeable to the parties involved, (ii) satisfy conditions to closing, or (iii) finance the acquisition on favorable terms, or at all. In addition, we may incur significant costs and divert management attention in connection with evaluating and negotiating potential acquisitions, including ones that we are subsequently not able to complete. If we are unable to acquire properties on favorable terms, or at all, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow could be adversely affected.
We face competition for the acquisition and development of real estate properties, which may impede our ability to grow our operations or may increase the cost of these activities.
We compete with many other entities for the acquisition of commercial real estate and land suitable for new developments, including other REITs, private institutional investors, and other owner-operators of commercial real estate. Larger REITs may enjoy competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital. These competitors may increase the market prices we would have to pay in order to acquire properties. If we are unable to acquire properties that meet our criteria at prices we deem reasonable, our ability to grow may be adversely affected.
We are subject to risks associated with real estate construction and development.
Our redevelopment and development-for-hold projects are subject to risks relating to our ability to complete our projects on time and on budget. Factors that may result in a development project exceeding budget or being prevented from completion include, but are not limited to:
our inability to secure sufficient financing or insurance on favorable terms, or at all;
construction delays, defects, or cost overruns, which may increase project development costs;
an increase in commodity or construction costs, including labor costs;
the discovery of hazardous or toxic substances, or other environmental, culturally-sensitive, or related issues;
an inability to obtain, or a significant delay in obtaining, zoning, construction, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations;
difficulty in complying with local, city, county and state rules and regulations regarding permitting, zoning, subdivision, utilities, and water quality, as well as federal rules and regulations regarding air and water quality and protection of endangered species and their habitats;
insufficient infrastructure capacity or availability (e.g., water, sewer and roads) to serve the needs of our projects;
an inability to secure tenants necessary to support the project or maintain compliance with debt covenants;
failure to achieve or sustain anticipated occupancy levels;
condemnation of all or parts of development or operating properties, which could adversely affect the value or viability of such projects; and
instability in the financial industry could reduce the availability of financing.

21



Significant instability in the financial industry like that experienced during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, may result in, among other things, declining property values and increasing defaults on loans. This, in turn, could lead to increased regulations, tightened credit requirements, reduced liquidity and increased credit risk premiums for virtually all borrowers. Deterioration in the credit environment may also impact us in other ways, including the credit or solvency of vendors, tenants, or joint venture partners, the ability of partners to fund their financial obligations to joint ventures and our access to mortgage financing for our own properties.
WeCommercial real estate investments are subjectrelatively illiquid.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to a numberpromptly sell one or more properties in our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions is limited.  The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, supply and demand, availability of financing, interest rates, and other factors that could cause leasing rental incomeare beyond our control.  We cannot be certain that we will be able to decline.
sell any property for the price and other terms we seek, or that any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us.  We ownalso cannot estimate with certainty the length of time needed to find a portfoliowilling purchaser and to complete the sale of commercial income properties.a property.  Factors that may adversely affect the portfolio’s profitability include, but are not limited to:
a significant numberimpede our ability to dispose of our tenants are unable to meet their obligations;
increases in non-recoverable operating and ownership costs;
we are unable to lease space at our properties when the space becomes available;
the rental rates upon a renewal or a new lease are significantly lower than prior rents or do not increase sufficiently to cover increases in operating and ownership costs;
the providing of lease concessions, such as free or discounted rents and tenant improvement allowances; and
the discovery of hazardous or toxic substances, or other environmental, culturally-sensitive, or related issues at the property.
The bankruptcy of key tenants maycould adversely affect our cash flowsfinancial condition and profitability.operating results.
We may derive significant cash flows and earnings from certain key tenants. If one or more of these tenants declares bankruptcy or voluntarily vacates from the leased premise and we are unable to re-lease such space or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms, we may be adversely impacted. Additionally, we may be further adversely impacted by an impairment or “write-down” of intangible assets, such as lease-in-place value, favorable lease asset, or a deferred asset related to straight-line lease rent, associated with a tenant bankruptcy or vacancy.
Our financial results are significantly influenced by the economic growth and strength of Hawai`i.
All of our redevelopment and development-for-hold activity is conducted in Hawai`i. Consequently, the growth and strength of Hawai`i’s economy has a significant impact on the demand for our real estate development projects. As a result, any adverse change to the growth or health of Hawai`i’s economy could have an adverse effect on our commercial real estate business.
The value of our development-for-hold projects and commercial properties is affected by a number of factors.
We have significant investments in various commercial real estate properties and development-for-hold projects. Weakness in the real estate sector, especially in Hawai`i, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing, and changes in our investment and redevelopment and development-for-hold strategy, among other factors, may affect the fair value of these real estate assets. If the undiscounted cash flows of our commercial properties or redevelopment or development-for-hold projects were to decline below the carrying value of those assets, we would be required to recognize an impairment loss if the fair value of those assets were below their carrying value.
Risks Relating to Our Land Operations Segment
We are subject to risks associated with real estate construction and development.
Our development-for-sale projects are subject to risks relatingthat are similar to our ability to complete our projects on time and on budget. Factors that may result in a development project exceeding budget or being prevented from completion include, but are not limited to: 
our inability or that of buyers to secure sufficient financing or insurance on favorable terms, or at all;
construction delays, defects, or cost overruns, which may increase project development costs;
an increase in commodity or construction costs, including labor costs;
the discovery of hazardous or toxic substances, or other environmental, culturally-sensitive, or related issues;
an inability to obtain, or a significant delay in obtaining, zoning, construction, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations;

22



difficulty in complying with local, city, county and state rules and regulations regarding permitting, zoning, subdivision, utilities, affordable housing and water quality, as well as federal rules and regulations regarding air and water quality and protection of endangered species and their habitats;
insufficient infrastructure capacity or availability (e.g., water, sewer and roads) to serve the needs of our projects;
an inability to secure buyers necessary to support the project or maintain compliance with debt covenants;
failure to achieve or sustain anticipated sales levels;
buyer defaults, including defaults under executed or binding contracts;
condemnation of all or parts of development or operating properties, which could adversely affect the value or viability of such projects;
an inability to sell our constructed inventory; and
instabilitythose described in the financial industry could reduceWe are subject to risks associated with real estate construction and development” risk factor above, under the availability of financing. “Risks Relating to Our Commercial Real Estate Segment” section.
Significant instability in the financial industry, like that experienced during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, may result in, among other things, declining property values and increasing defaults on loans. This, in turn, could lead to increased regulations, tightened credit requirements, reduced liquidity and increased credit risk premiums for virtually all borrowers. Fewer loan products and strict loan qualifications make it more difficult for borrowers to finance the purchase of units in our projects. Additionally, more stringent requirements to obtain financing for buyers of commercial properties make it significantly more difficult for us to sell commercial properties and may negatively impact the sales prices and other terms of such sales. Deterioration in the credit environment may also impact us in other ways, including the credit or solvency of customers, vendors, or joint venture partners, the ability of partners to fund their financial obligations to joint ventures and our access to mortgage financing for our own properties.
Governmental entities have adopted or may adopt regulatory requirements that may restrict our development activity.
We are subject to extensive and complex laws and regulations that affect the land development process, including laws and regulations related to zoning and permitted land uses. Government entities have adopted or may approve regulations or laws that could negatively impact the availability of land and development opportunities within those areas. It is possible that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers in the future that could adversely affect our ability to develop projects in the affected markets or could require that we satisfy additional administrative and regulatory requirements, which could delay development progress or increase the development costs to us.
Real estate development projects are subject to warranty and construction defect claims, in the ordinary course of business, that can be significant.
In our development-for-sale projects, we are subject to warranty and construction defect claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The amounts payable under these claims, both in legal fees and remedying any construction defects, can be significant and could exceed the profits made from the project. As a consequence, we may maintain liability insurance, obtain indemnities and certificates of insurance from contractors generally covering claims related to workmanship and materials, and create warranty and other reserves for projects based on historical experience and qualitative risks associated with the type of project built. Because of the uncertainties inherent in these matters, we cannot provide any assurance that our insurance coverage, contractor arrangements and reserves will be adequate to address some or all of our warranty and construction defect claims in the future. For example, contractual indemnities may be difficult to enforce, we may be responsible for applicable self-insured retentions, and certain claims may not be covered by insurance or may exceed applicable coverage limits. Additionally, the coverage offered, and the availability of liability insurance for construction defects, could be limited or costly. Accordingly, we cannot provide any assurance that such coverage will be adequate, available at an acceptable cost, or available at all.
We are involved in joint ventures and subject to risks associated with joint venture relationships.
We are involved in joint venture relationships and may initiate future joint venture projects. A joint venture involves certain risks, such as, among others:
we may not have voting control over the joint venture;
we may not be able to maintain good relationships with our venture partners;
the venture partner, at any time, may have economic or business interests that are inconsistent with our economic or business interests;

23



the venture partner may fail to fund its share of capital for operations and development activities or to fulfill its other commitments, including providing accurate and timely accounting and financial information to us;
the joint venture or venture partner could lose key personnel;
the venture partner could become insolvent, requiring us to assume all risks and capital requirements related to the joint venture project, and any resulting bankruptcy proceedings could have an adverse impact on the operation of the project or the joint venture; and
we may be required to perform on guarantees we have provided, or agree to provide in the future, related to the completion of a joint venture’s construction and development of a project, joint venture indebtedness, or on indemnification of a third party serving as surety for a joint venture’s bonds for such completion.


Our financial results are significantly influenced by the economic growth and strength of Hawai`Hawai‘i.
Virtually all of our real estate development activity is conducted in Hawai`Hawai‘i. Consequently, the growth and strength of Hawai`Hawai‘i’s economy has a significant impact on the demand for our real estate development projects. As a result, any adverse change to the growth or health of Hawai`Hawai‘i’s economy could have an adverse effect on our real estate business.
The value of our development projects and/or our joint venture investments is affected by a number of factors.
We have significant investments in various development projects and joint venture investments. Weakness in the real estate sector, especially in Hawai`Hawai‘i, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing, difficulty in obtaining governmental permits and authorizations, difficulty in securing infrastructure capacity or availability (e.g., water, sewer, and roads), and changes in our investment and development strategy, among other factors, may affect the fair value of these real estate assets owned by us or by our joint ventures. If the fair value of our joint venture development projects were to decline below the carrying value of those assets, and that decline was other-than-temporary, we would be required to recognize an impairment loss. Additionally, if the undiscounted cash flows of our development projects were to decline below the carrying value of those assets, we would be required to recognize an impairment loss if the fair value of those assets were below their carrying value.
Our ability to use or lease agricultural lands for agricultural purposes may be limited by government regulation.
Given the large scale of our agricultural landholdings on Maui and Kauai, many of the third parties to whom we lease land for agricultural purposes may be characterized as large scale commercial agricultural operations. Legislation passed on Kauai placed restrictions on the ability of such operations to use land within specified distances of highways, schools, oceans, streams, residences, parks, care homes, hospitals and other similar uses, to grow crops other than ground cover. This legislation also put significant restrictions regarding, and public notification obligations concerning, pesticide use on such operations and limited their ability to use genetically modified organism (GMO) crops. On Maui, similar legislation passed by a voter initiative placed a moratorium on the ability to farm GMO crops. In November 2016, the Kauai and Maui legislation was invalidated by the courts. If additional legislative agricultural restrictions are passed, such as restrictions on the use of pesticides, our ability to use or lease lands for large scale agricultural purposes, and any rents that we can achieve for those lands, may be adversely affected.
The transition to a diversified agricultural model is subject to both the risks affecting the business generally and the inherent difficulties associated with implementing and executing the strategy.
Our ability to transition to a new diversified model and improve the operating results depends upon a number of factors, including:
the extent to which management has properly understood and is able to manage the dynamics and demands of the various farming operations comprising the diversified agricultural model, in which we may have limited or no prior experience;
the ability to secure applicable permits and/or licenses from governmental agencies that may be necessary for executing the strategy;
the ability to respond to any unanticipated changes in expected cash flows, liquidity, cash needs and cash expenditures with respect to the new diversified model, including our ability to obtain any additional financing or other liquidity enhancing transactions, if and when needed;
the ability to execute strategic initiatives in a cost-effective manner, including identifying business partners to explore potential opportunities; and

24



our ability to access adequate, affordable and uninterrupted sources of water (see the “The lack of water for agricultural irrigation could adversely affect the operations and profitability of the Land Operations segment” risk factor below).

Commercial agriculture is challenged in Hawaii, as in other U.S. jurisdictions, due to various factors, including high production costs, a shrinking farm labor base, and community opposition to conventional farming techniques, which include the use of legally approved chemical pesticides and fertilizers and the concentrated presence of livestock. These factors could impact our ability to successfully transition to diversified agriculture, and could similarly affect the success of leasehold tenant farmers on our agricultural lands.

There is no assurance that we will be able to effectively implement and execute a new diversified agricultural model, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
The diversified agricultural model may not achieve the financial results expected.
We are currently evaluating several categories of replacement agricultural activities in the transition to the diversified model, including but not limited to energy crops, agroforestry, grass finished livestock operations, diversified food crops/agricultural park, and orchard crops. There is no assurance that our replacement agricultural activities will be economically feasible or improve the Land Operations segment’s operating results.
Agricultural land is illiquid and difficult to value.

Even if qualified farm lessees can be identified and engaged in leases, agricultural operations are high risk by nature and turnover can be expected. From a landlord’s perspective, agricultural leases produce only modest rents that could imply a valuation of the land that could materially understate other methods of appraising asset value.

Our power sales contracts could be replaced on less favorable terms or may not be replaced.
Our power sales contracts expire at various points in the future and may not be replaced or could be replaced on less favorable terms, which could adversely affect Land Operations profitability.
The market for power sales in Hawai`Hawai‘i is limited.
The power distribution systems in Hawai`Hawai‘i are small and island-specific; currently, there is no ability to move power generated on one island to any other island. In addition, Hawai`Hawai‘i law generally limits the ability of independent power producers, such as us, to sell their output to firms other than the respective utilities on each island, without themselves becoming utilities and subject to the State’s Public Utilities Commission (PUC) regulation. Further, any sales of electricity by us to the utilities on each island are subject to the approval of the PUC. Unlike some areas in the Mainland, Hawai`Hawai‘i’s independent power producers have no ability to use utility infrastructure to transfer power to other locations.
The lack of water for agricultural irrigation could adversely affect the operations and profitability of the Land Operations segment.
It is crucial for our land to have access to sufficient, reliable and affordable sources of water in order to conduct anysustainable agricultural activity. On Maui, there are regulatoryactivity on our lands. Existing infrastructure serving these agricultural lands rely on the collection and legal challenges to ourtransmission of surface waters. If the ability to divert water from streams. In addition, access to water is subject to weather patterns that cannot reliably be predicted. If we are limited in our ability to divert streamsurface waters for ouragricultural use is limited or there is insufficient rainfall on an extended basis, this would have a significant, adverse effect on the utility of the land and our ability to employ the land in active agricultural use. On Maui and Kauai, where our agricultural lands are located, there are regulatory and legal challenges to water diversion from streams.
Water availability also is critical to the successful implementation of farming plans on those lands purchased from us by Mahi Pono Holdings LLC ("Mahi Pono") in conjunction with our sale of certain agricultural landholdings on Maui (the "Agricultural Land Sale"). As described in our public filings associated with that sale, as well as Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements,


if Mahi Pono is unable to secure sufficient water to support the agricultural plans for which it purchased the lands, this could trigger certain financial obligations.
Governmental entities have adopted or may adopt regulatory requirements related to our dams, reservoirs, and other water infrastructure that may adversely affect our operations.
We are subject to inspections and regulations that apply to certain of our dams, reservoirs, and other water infrastructure. Certain of these facilities have deficiencies noted by the State of Hawaii,Hawai‘i, which we are working with the regulators to resolve. It is possible that current or future requirements imposed on landowners and dam owners/operators may require that we satisfy additional administrative and regulatory requirements and thereby increase the holding costs to us and/or decrease the operational utility of the subject facilities.


25



Risks Relating to Our Materials & Construction Segment
Our Materials & Construction segment’s revenue growth and profitability are dependent on factors outside of our control.
Our Materials & Construction segment’s ability to grow its revenues and improve profitability is dependent on factors outside of our control, which include, but are not limited to:
decreased government funding for infrastructure projects (see the “Economic downturns or reductions in government funding of infrastructure projects could reduce our revenues and profits from our materials and construction businesses.”businesses” risk factor below);
reduced spending by private sector customers resulting from poor economic conditions in Hawai`Hawai‘i;
an increased number of competitors;
less success in competitive bidding for contracts;
a decline in transportation and logistical costs, which may result in customers purchasing material from sources located outside of Hawai`Hawai‘i in a more cost-efficient manner;
limitations on access to necessary working capital and investment capital to sustain growth; and
inability to hire and retain essential personnel and to acquire equipment to support growth.

Economic downturns or reductions in government funding of infrastructure projects could reduce our revenues and profits from our materials and construction businesses.
The segment’s products are used in public infrastructure projects, which include the construction, maintenance and improvement of highways, streets, roads, airport runways and similar projects. Our materials and construction businesses, including our aggregates business, are highly dependent on the amount and timing of infrastructure work funded by various governmental entities, which, in turn, depends on the overall condition of the economy, the need for new or replacement infrastructure, the priorities placed on various projects funded by governmental entities and federal, state or local government spending levels. We cannot be assured of the existence, amount and timing of appropriations for spending on these and other future projects, including state and federal spending on roads and highways. Spending on infrastructure could decline for numerous reasons, including decreased revenues received by state and local governments for spending on such projects (including federal funding), and other competing priorities for available state, local and federal funds. State spending on highway and other projects can be adversely affected by decreases or delays in, or uncertainties regarding, federal highway funding. The segment is reliant upon contracts with the City and County of Honolulu, the State of Hawai`Hawai‘i and the Federal Government for a significant portion of its revenues. If revenues and profits are impacted by economic downturns or reductions in government funding, the segment’s long-lived assets and goodwill may become impaired.
We may face community opposition to the operation or expansion of quarries or other facilities.
Quarries and other segment facilities require special and conditional use permits to operate. Permitting and licensing applications and proceedings and regulatory enforcement proceedings are all matters open to public scrutiny and comment. In addition, the Makakilo quarry is adjacent to residential areas and heavy equipment and explosives are used in the mining process. As a result, from time to time, our Materials & Construction segment operations may be subject to community opposition and adverse publicity that may have a negative effect on operations and delay or limit any future expansion or development of segment operations.
Our materials and construction businesses operate only in Hawai`i, and adverse changes to the economy and business environment in Hawai`i could adversely affect operations and profitability.
Because our operations are concentrated in a specific geographic location, our materials and construction businesses are susceptible to fluctuations in operations and profitability caused by changes in economic or other conditions in Hawai`i.
Significant contracts may be canceled, or we may be disqualified from bidding for new contracts.
Governmental entities typically have the right to cancel their contracts with our construction businesses at any time with payment generally only for the work already completed plus a negotiated compensatory overhead recovery amount. In addition,


our construction businesses could be prohibited from bidding on certain governmental contracts if we fail to maintain qualifications required by those entities, such as maintaining an acceptable safety record.

26



If our materials and construction businesses are unable to accurately estimate the overall risks, requirements or costs when bidding on or negotiating a contract that we are ultimately awarded, the segment may achieve a lower than anticipated profit or incur a loss on the contract.
The majority of the Materials & Construction segment’s revenues are derived from “quantity pricing” (fixed unit price) contracts. Approximately 19 percent of 2017 segment revenues and backlog are derived from “lump sum” (fixed total price) contracts. Quantity pricing contracts require the provision of line-item materials at a fixed unit price based on approved quantities irrespective of actual per unit costs. Lump sum contracts require that the total amount of work be performed for a single price irrespective of actual quantities or actual costs. Expected profits on contracts are realized only if costs are accurately estimated and then successfully controlled. If cost estimates for a contract are inaccurate, or if the contract is not performed within cost estimates, then cost overruns may result in losses or cause the contract not to be as profitable as expected.
If our materials and construction businesses are unable to attract and retain key personnel and skilled labor, or encounter labor difficulties, the ability to bid for and successfully complete contracts may be negatively impacted.
The ability to attract and retain reliable, qualified personnel is a significant factor that enables our materials and construction businesses to successfully bid for and profitably complete their work. This includes members of management, project managers, estimators, supervisors, and foremen. The segment’s future success also will depend on its ability to hire, train and retain, or to attract, when needed, highly skilled management personnel. If competition for these employees is intense, it could be difficult to hire and retain the personnel necessary to support operations. If we do not succeed in retaining our current employees and attracting, developing and retaining new highly skilled employees, segment operations and future earnings may be negatively impacted.
A majority of segment personnel are unionized. Any work stoppage or other labor dispute involving unionized workforce, or inability to renew contracts with the unions, could have an adverse effect on operations.
Our construction and construction-related businesses may fail to meet schedule or performance requirements of our paving contracts.
Asphalt paving contracts have penalties for late completion. In most instances, projects must be completed within an allotted number of business or calendar days from the time the notice to proceed is received, subject to allowances for additional days due to weather delays or additional work requested by the customer. If our construction businesses subsequently fail to complete the project as scheduled, we may be responsible for contractually agreed-upon liquidated damages, an amount assessed per day beyond the contractually allotted days, at the discretion of the customer. Under these circumstances, the total project cost could exceed original estimates and could result in a loss of profit or a loss on the project. Additionally, our construction businesses enter into lump sum and quantity pricing contracts where profits can be adversely affected by a number of factors beyond our control, which can cause actual costs to materially exceed the costs estimated at the time of our original bid.
Timing of the award and performance of new contracts could have an adverse effect on Materials & Construction segment operating results and cash flow.
It is generally very difficult to predict whether and when bids for new projects will be offered for tender, as these projects frequently involve a lengthy and complex design and bidding process, which is affected by a number of factors, such as market conditions, funding arrangements and governmental approvals. Because of these factors, segment results of operations and cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year, and the fluctuation may be substantial.
The uncertainty of the timing of contract awards after a winning bid is submitted may also present difficulties in matching the size of equipment fleet and work crews with contract needs. In some cases, our materials and construction businesses may maintain and bear the cost of more equipment than is currently required, in anticipation of future needs for existing contracts or expected future contracts.
In addition, the timing of the revenues, earnings and cash flows from contracts can be delayed by a number of factors, including delays in receiving material and equipment from suppliers and services from subcontractors and changes in the scope of work to be performed.

27




Dependence on a limited number of customers could adversely affect our materials and construction businesses and results of operations.
Due to the size and nature of the segment’s construction contracts, one or a few customers, such as the Federal Government, the State of Hawai‘i, and the various counties in Hawai‘i, have in the past and may in the future represent a substantial portion of consolidated segment revenues and gross profits in any one year or over a period of several consecutive years. For example, in 2017, approximately 86 percent of Grace’s construction related revenue was generated from projects administered by the federal government, State of Hawai`i, or the various counties in Hawai`i where Grace served as general contractor or subcontractor. Similarly, segment backlog frequently reflects multiple contracts for certain customers; therefore, one customer may comprise a significant percentage of backlog at a certain point in time. For example, the State of Hawai`i comprised approximately 56 percent of Grace’s construction backlog at December 31, 2017. The loss of business from any such customer, or a default or delay in payment on a significant scale by a customer, could have an adverse effect on our materials and construction businesses or results of operations.
Our materials and construction businesses are likely to require more capital over the longer term.
The property and machinery needed to produce aggregate products and perform asphaltic concrete paving contracts are expensive. Although capital needs over the next five years are expected to be relatively modest, over the longer term, our materials and construction businesses may require increasing annual capital expenditures. The segment’s ability to generate sufficient cash flow to fund these expenditures depends on future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business, and other factors affecting operations, many of which are beyond our control. If the segment is unable to generate sufficient cash to operate its business,businesses, it may be required, among other things, to further reduce or delay planned capital or operating expenditures.
An inability to obtain bonding could limit the aggregate dollar amount of contracts that our materials and construction businesses are able to pursue.
As is customary in the construction industry, we may be required to provide surety bonds to our customers to secure our performance under construction contracts. Our ability to obtain surety bonds primarily depends upon our capitalization, working capital, past performance, management expertise and reputation and certain external factors, including the overall capacity of the surety market. Surety companies consider such factors in relationship to the amount of backlog and their underwriting standards, which may change from time to time. Events that adversely affect the insurance and bonding markets generally may result in bonding becoming more difficult to obtain in the future, or being available only at a significantly greater cost. The inability to obtain adequate bonding would limit the amount that our construction businesses are able to able bid on new contracts and could have an adverse effect on the segment’s future revenues and business prospects.
Our Materials & Construction segment operations are subject to hazards that may cause personal injury or property damage, thereby subjecting us to liabilities and possible losses, which may not be covered by insurance.
Segment employees are subject to the usual hazards associated with performing construction activities on road construction sites, plants and quarries. Operating hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, damage to or destruction of property, plant and equipment and environmental damage. We maintain general liability and excess liability insurance, workers’ compensation insurance, auto insurance and other types of insurance, all in amounts consistent with our materials and construction businesses’ risk of loss and industry practice, but this insurance may not be adequate to cover all losses or liabilities incurred in operations.
Insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and quantify due to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination of liability in proportion to other parties, the number of incidents not reported and the effectiveness of the segment’s safety program. If insurance claims or costs were above our estimates, our materials and construction businesses might be required to use working capital to satisfy these claims, which could impact their ability to maintain or expand their operations.
Environmental and other regulatory matters could adversely affect our materials and construction businesses’ ability to conduct business and could require significant expenditures.
Segment operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations relating to the management, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances, climate change and the emission and discharge of pollutants into the air and water. Our materials and construction businesses could be held liable for such contamination created not only from their own activities but also from the historical activities of others on properties that the segment acquires or leases. Segment operations are also subject to laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and worker health, which, among other

28



things, regulate employee exposure to hazardous substances. Violations of such laws and regulations could subject us to substantial fines and penalties, cleanup costs, third-party property damage or personal injury claims. In addition, these laws and regulations have become, and enforcement practices and compliance standards are becoming, increasingly stringent. Moreover, we cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of legislation or regulatory requirements that could be imposed, or how existing or future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, with respect to products or activities to which they have not been previously applied. Compliance with more stringent laws or regulations, as well as more vigorous enforcement policies of the regulatory agencies, could require substantial expenditures


for, among other things, equipment not currently possessed, or the acquisition or modification of permits applicable to segment activities.
Short supplies and volatility in the costs of fuel, energy and raw materials may adversely affect our materials and construction businesses.
Our materials and construction businesses require a continued supply of diesel fuel, electricity and other energy sources for production and transportation. The financial results of these businesses have at times been affected by the high costs of these energy sources. Significant increases in costs, or reduced availability of these energy sources, have and may in the future reduce financial results. Moreover, fluctuations in the supply and costs of these energy sources can make planning business operations more difficult. We do not hedge our fuel price risk, but instead focus on volume-related price reductions, fuel efficiency, alternative fuel sources, consumption and the natural hedge created by the ability to increase aggregates prices.
Similarly, segment operations also require a continued supply of liquid asphalt, which serves as a key raw material in the production of asphaltic concrete. Liquid asphalt is subject to potential supply constraints and significant price fluctuations, which are generally correlated to the price of crude oil, though not as closely as diesel or gasoline, and are beyond the control of our materials and construction business.businesses. Accordingly, significant increases in the price of crude oil will have an adverse impact on the financial results of the Materials & Construction segment due to higher costs of production of asphaltic concrete. Conversely, significant declines in the price of oil had, and in the future may have, an adverse impact on our material and construction sales of liquid asphalt concrete, due to lower costs of importing asphalt to Hawai`Hawai‘i, which may result in customers sourcing liquid asphalt from competition located outside of Hawai`Hawai‘i.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A&B owns 16,000 acresThe information set forth under the "Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies" section in Note 14 of watershed landsNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in East Maui. A&B also held four water licenses to another 30,000 acres owned by the State of Hawai`i in East Maui. The last of these water license agreements expired in 1986, and all four agreements were then extended as revocable permits that were renewed annually. In 2001, a request was made to the State Board of Land and Natural Resources (the "BLNR") to replace these revocable permits with a long-term water lease. Pending the conclusion by the BLNRPart II, Item 8 of this contested case hearing on the request for the long-term lease, the BLNR has kept the existing permits on a holdover basis. Three parties filed a lawsuit on April 10, 2015 (the "4/10/15 Lawsuit") alleging that the BLNR has been renewing the revocable permits annually rather than keeping them in holdover status. The lawsuit asks the court to void the revocable permits and to declare that the renewals were illegally issued without preparation of an environmental assessment ("EA"). In December 2015, the BLNR decided to reaffirm its prior decisions to keep the permits in holdover status. This decisionreport, is incorporated herein by the BLNR is being challenged by the three parties. In January 2016, the court ruled in the 4/10/15 Lawsuit that the renewals were not subject to the EA requirement, but that the BLNR lacked legal authority to keep the revocable permits in holdover status beyond one year. The court has allowed the parties to make an immediate appeal of this ruling. In May 2016, the Hawai`i State Legislature passed House Bill 2501, which specified that the BLNR has the legal authority to issue holdover revocable permits for the disposition of water rights for a period not to exceed three years. The governor signed this bill into law as Act 126 in June 2016. Pursuant to Act 126, the annual authorization of the existing holdover permits was sought and granted by the BLNR in December 2016 and November 2017.

In addition, on May 24, 2001, petitions were filed by a third party, requesting that the Commission on Water Resource Management of the State of Hawai`i ("Water Commission") establish interim instream flow standards ("IIFS") in 27 East Maui streams that feed the Company's irrigation system. The Water Commission initially took action on the petitions in 2008 and 2010, but the petitioners requested a contested case hearing to challenge the Water Commission's decisions on certain petitions. The Water Commission denied the contested case hearing request, but the petitioners successfully appealed the denial to the Hawai`i Intermediate Court of Appeals, which ordered the Water Commission to grant the request. The Commission then authorized the appointment of a hearings officer for the contested case hearing and expanded the scope of the contested case

29



hearing to encompass all 27 petitions for amendment of the IIFS for East Maui streams in 23 hydrologic units. The evidentiary phase of the hearing before the Commission-appointed hearings officer was completed on April 2, 2015. On January 15, 2016, the Commission-appointed hearings officer issued his recommended decision on the petitions. The recommended decision would restore water to streams in 11 of the 23 hydrologic units. In March 2016, the hearings officer ordered a reopening of the contested case proceedings in light of the Company’s January 2016 announcement to cease sugar operations at HC&S by the end of the year and to transition to a new diversified agricultural model on the former sugar lands. In April 2016, the Company announced its commitment to fully and permanently restore the priority taro streams identified by the petitioners. Re-opened evidentiary hearings occurred in the first quarter of 2017 and a decision is pending. In August 2017, the hearings officer in the reopened evidentiary hearing issued his proposed decision. The Commission heard arguments on the proposed decision in October 2017.

HC&S also used water from four streams in Central Maui ("Na Wai Eha") to irrigate its agricultural lands in Central Maui. Beginning in 2004, the Water Commission began proceedings to establish IIFS for the Na Wai Eha streams. Before the IIFS proceedings were concluded, the Water Commission designated Na Wai Eha as a surface water management area, meaning that all uses of water from these streams required water use permits issued by the Water Commission. Following contested case proceedings, the Water Commission established IIFS in 2010, but that decision was appealed, and the Hawai`i Supreme Court remanded the case to the Water Commission for further proceedings. The parties to the IIFS contested case settled the case in 2014. Thereafter, proceedings for the issuance of water use permits commenced with over 100 applicants, including HC&S, vying for permits. While the water use permit proceedings were ongoing, A&B announced the cessation of sugar cane cultivation at the end of 2016. This announcement triggered a re-opening and reconsideration of the 2014 IIFS decision. Contested case proceedings were held to simultaneously reconsider the IIFS, determine appurtenant water rights, and consider applications for water use permits. Based on those proceedings, the Hearing Officer issued his recommendation to the Water Commission on November 1, 2017. The Commission has not yet issued its decision.

If the Company is not permitted to use sufficient quantities of stream waters, it would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s pursuit of a diversified agribusiness model in subsequent years and the value of the Company’s agricultural lands.
A&B is a party to, or may be contingently liable in connection with, other legal actions arising in the normal conduct of its businesses, the outcomes of which, in the opinion of management after consultation with counsel, would not have a material effect on A&B’s consolidated financial statements as a whole.

reference.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
The information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of RegulationsRegulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104) is included in Exhibit 95 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



30





PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol ALEX. As of February 15, 2018,43875, there were 2,244approximately 2,035 shareholders of record of A&B common stock.record. In addition, Cede & Co., which appears as a single record holder, represents the holdings of thousands of beneficial owners of A&B common stock.
The following performance graph below compares the monthly dollar change in the cumulative shareholdertotal return on the Company’sCompany's common stock:stock with that of the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index ("S&P 500") and two industry peer group indices, FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs and FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers, from December 31, 2014 through December 31, 2019. The stock price performance graph assumes that an investor invested $100 in each of A&B and the indices, and the reinvestment of any dividends. The comparisons in the graph are provided in accordance with the SEC disclosure requirements and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of the future performance of A&B's shares of common stock.
returngrapha01.jpg
Trading volume averaged 213,042304,596 shares a day in 2017, 178,8582019, 353,100 shares a day in 2016,2018, and 172,542213,206 shares a day in 2015.

31



The quarterly intra-day high and low sales prices and end of quarter closing prices, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, were as follows:
 Dividends Paid Per Share Market Price
   High Low Close
2016       
First Quarter$0.06
 $37.83
 $28.82
 $36.68
Second Quarter$0.06
 $39.36
 $32.94
 $36.14
Third Quarter$0.06
 $42.80
 $35.12
 $38.42
Fourth Quarter$0.07
 $46.43
 $36.98
 $44.87
        
2017       
First Quarter$0.07
 $46.27
 $40.78
 $44.52
Second Quarter$0.07
 $46.87
 $39.53
 $41.38
Third Quarter$0.07
 $46.67
 $40.58
 $46.33
Fourth Quarter$15.92
 $46.96
 $27.50
 $27.74
During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company declared a distribution to its shareholders in the aggregate amount of $783 million (approximately $15.92 per share) ("Special Distribution"), which represented the Company's previously undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits accumulated prior to January 1, 2017, the Company's REIT taxable income for the 2017 taxable year, and a substantial portion of the Company's estimated REIT taxable income for the 2018 taxable year. The Company completed the payment of the Special Distribution on January 23, 2018 through an aggregate of $156.6 million in cash and the issuance of 22,587,299 shares of the Company's common stock.
The Company has completed a conversion process to qualify as a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2017. As a REIT the Company is generally required to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains). Generally, the Company expects to distribute all or substantially all of the REIT taxable income, including net capital gains, so as to not be subject to the income or excise tax on undistributed REIT taxable income. The Company's Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, will determine on a quarterly basis the amount of cash to be distributed to the Company's shareholders based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, A&B's results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions, tax considerations, borrowing capacity and other factors, including debt covenant restrictions, that may impose limitations on cash payments and plans for future acquisitions and divestitures.
A&B common stock is included in the Russell 2000 Index, Russell 3000 Index, and the S&P 400 Diversified REITs Sub IndustrySmallCap 600 Index.
In October 2017, A&B’s Board of Directors authorized A&B to repurchase up to $150 million of its common stock beginning on November 8, 2017 through December 31, 2019. The authorization supersedes a previous authorization that was originally set to expire on December 31, 2017. No shares were repurchased in 2017, 2016, or 2015 under such plan.

32




Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans as ofat December 31, 2017,2019, included:
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(a) 1
(b) 1
(c) 2
 
(a)1
(b)1
(c)2
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders630,500$12.581,064,838 352,200$13.951,511,986
Total630,500$12.581,064,838
1 Number of securities reflects the antidilutive adjustments to outstanding stock option awards, including the number of stock options and the weighted average price for such awards, as a result of the Company's Special Distribution that was declared on November 16, 2018 and settled on January 23, 2018 in connection with its conversion to a REIT.awards.
2 Under the 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, 1,064,8381,511,986 shares may be issued either as restricted stock grants, restricted stock unit grants, or stock option grants.
The following areThere were no unregistered equity securities sold by the Company's recentCompany during 2019.
There were no purchases of equity securities and use of proceeds formade by the Company during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017.2019.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
1
Average Price
Paid per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
Maximum Number
of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs
October 1-31, 20171,672$45.24
November 1-30, 2017$—
December 1-31, 2017256,928$28.72
1 Represents shares accepted in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations arising upon option exercises.

33





ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
 Year Ended December 31,
(In millions, except per share amounts)2017 2016 2015 2014 
20131
Consolidated statements of operations data2:
         
Operating Revenue:         
Commercial Real Estate$136.9
 $134.7
 $133.6
 $125.3
 $78.5
Land Operations84.5
 61.9
 120.2
 96.7
 104.7
Materials & Construction204.1
 190.9
 219.0
 234.3
 54.9
Total Operating Revenue425.5
 387.5
 472.8
 456.3
 238.1
Operating Costs and Expenses:         
Cost of Commercial Real Estate75.5
 79.0
 80.4
 78.0
 46.6
Cost of Land Operations60.4
 35.0
 71.1
 57.4
 69.4
Cost of Materials & Construction166.1
 154.5
 175.7
 191.3
 47.6
Selling, general and administrative66.4
 52.0
 51.6
 52.9
 41.2
REIT evaluation/conversion costs3
15.2
 9.5
 
 
 
Impairment of real estate assets4
22.4
 11.7
 
 
 
Acquisition/ separation costs5

 
 
 
 4.6
Total operating costs and expenses406.0
 341.7
 378.8
 379.6
 209.4
Operating Income19.5
 45.8
 94.0
 76.7
 28.7
Income related to joint ventures6
7.2
 19.2
 36.8
 1.8
 (2.3)
Reductions in solar investments, net7
(2.6) (9.8) (2.6) (14.7) 
Interest and other income, net2.1
 (1.7) (2.5) 6.1
 2.7
Interest expense, net(25.6) (26.3) (26.8) (29.0) (19.1)
Gain on insurance proceeds
 
 
 
 2.4
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and net gain (loss) on sale of improved properties0.6
 27.2
 98.9
 40.9
 12.4
Income tax benefit (expense)7
218.2
 0.5
 (37.0) (4.1) (7.0)
Income from continuing operations before net gain (loss) on sale of improved properties218.8
 27.7
 61.9
 36.8
 5.4
Net gain (loss) on sale of improved properties, net of income taxes8
9.3
 5.0
 (1.1) 
 
Income from continuing operations228.1
 32.7
 60.8
 36.8
 5.4
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax2.4
 (41.1) (29.7) 27.7
 29.4
Net income (loss)230.5
 (8.4) 31.1
 64.5
 34.8
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest(2.2) (1.8) (1.5) (3.1) (0.5)
Net income (loss) attributable to A&B$228.3
 $(10.2) $29.6
 $61.4
 $34.3
          
Capital expenditures9,10,11
$42.5
 $119.6
 $44.7
 $75.1
 $505.3
          
Depreciation and amortization11
$41.4
 $119.5
 $55.7
 $55.0
 $41.7
          
Earnings (loss) available to A&B shareholders per share:
         
Basic:         
Continuing operations available to A&B Shareholders$4.63
 $0.66
 $1.15
 $0.69
 $0.11
Discontinued operations available to A&B Shareholders0.05
 (0.84) (0.61) 0.57
 0.66
Basic earnings per share available to A&B Shareholders$4.68
 $(0.18) $0.54
 $1.26
 $0.77
Diluted:         
Continuing operations available to A&B Shareholders$4.30
 $0.65
 $1.14
 $0.68
 $0.11
  Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except per share amounts) 
20196
 
20186
 2017 2016 2015
Operating Revenue:          
Commercial Real Estate $160.6
 $140.3
 $136.9
 $134.7
 $133.6
Land Operations 114.1
 289.5
 84.5
 61.9
 120.2
Materials & Construction 160.5
 214.6
 204.1
 190.9
 219.0
Total operating revenue 435.2
 644.4
 425.5
 387.5
 472.8
Operating Costs and Expenses:          
Cost of Commercial Real Estate 89.0
 77.2
 75.5
 79.0
 80.4
Cost of Land Operations 92.5
 117.1
 60.4
 35.0
 71.1
Cost of Materials & Construction 159.4
 188.1
 166.1
 154.5
 175.7
Selling, general and administrative 58.9
 61.2
 66.4
 52.0
 51.6
REIT evaluation/conversion costs1
 
 
 15.2
 9.5
 
Impairment of assets2
 49.7
 79.4
 22.4
 11.7
 
Total operating costs and expenses 449.5
 523.0
 406.0
 341.7
 378.8
Gain (loss) on the sale of commercial real estate properties 
 51.4
 9.3
 8.1
 (1.8)
Operating Income (Loss) (14.3) 172.8
 28.8
 53.9
 92.2
Other Income and (Expenses):          
Income (loss) related to joint ventures 5.3
 (4.1) 7.2
 19.2
 36.8
Impairment of equity method investments3
 
 (188.6) 
 
 
Interest and other income (expense), net 3.2
 2.3
 (0.5) (11.5) (5.1)
Interest expense (33.1) (35.3) (25.6) (26.3) (26.8)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes (38.9) (52.9) 9.9
 35.3
 97.1
Income tax benefit (expense) 2.0
 (16.3) 218.2
 (2.6) (36.3)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations (36.9) (69.2) 228.1
 32.7
 60.8
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (1.5) (0.6) 2.4
 (41.1) (29.7)
Net Income (Loss) (38.4) (69.8) 230.5
 (8.4) 31.1
Loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.0
 (2.2) (2.2) (1.8) (1.5)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $(36.4) $(72.0) $228.3
 $(10.2) $29.6
           
Capital expenditures4,5
 $255.1
 $296.1
 $42.5
 $119.6
 $44.7
Depreciation and amortization5
 $50.5
 $42.8
 $41.4
 $119.5
 $55.7
           
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Available to A&B Shareholders:          
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:          
Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders $(0.49) $(1.01) $4.63
 $0.66
 $1.15
Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders (0.02) (0.01) 0.05
 (0.84) (0.61)
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $(0.51) $(1.02) $4.68
 $(0.18) $0.54
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:          
Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders $(0.49) $(1.01) $4.30
 $0.65
 $1.14
Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders (0.02) (0.01) 0.04
 (0.83) (0.60)
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $(0.51) $(1.02) $4.34
 $(0.18) $0.54
           
Cash dividends declared per common share $0.69
 $
 $4.48
 $0.25
 $0.21
           

34




Discontinued operations available to A&B Shareholders0.04
 (0.83) (0.60) 0.57
 0.65
Diluted earnings per share available to A&B Shareholders$4.34
 $(0.18) $0.54
 $1.25
 $0.76
          
Cash dividends declared per common share$4.48
 $0.25
 $0.21
 $0.17
 $0.04
          
 As of December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015 2014 
20131
Consolidated balance sheet data:         
Investment in real estate and joint ventures$1,557.5
 $1,573.9
 $1,564.6
 $1,639.9
 $1,606.8
Total assets12
$2,231.2
 $2,156.3
 $2,242.3
 $2,321.1
 $2,274.7
Total liabilities12
$1,572.1
 $932.3
 $1,003.6
 $1,107.3
 $1,108.2
Redeemable noncontrolling interest$8.0
 $10.8
 $11.6
 $
 $
Total equity (includes noncontrolling interest)$651.1
 $1,213.2
 $1,227.1
 $1,213.8
 $1,166.5
Long-term debt – non-current12
$585.2
 $472.7
 $496.6
 $632.0
 $606.6
  December 31,
(in millions) 
20196
 
20186
 2017 2016 2015
Consolidated balance sheet data:          
Total assets $2,084.3
 $2,225.2
 $2,231.2
 $2,156.3
 $2,242.3
Total liabilities $949.3
 $1,009.0
 $1,572.1
 $932.3
 $1,003.6
Notes payable and other debt $704.6
 $778.1
 $631.2
 $515.1
 $588.2
Redeemable noncontrolling interest $6.3
 $7.9
 $8.0
 $10.8
 $11.6
Total equity (includes noncontrolling interest)7
 $1,128.7
 $1,208.3
 $651.1
 $1,213.2
 $1,227.1
1
2013 includes the results, capital expenditures, and depreciation and amortization of Grace from the acquisition date of October 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.
2
Amounts recast to reflect the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.
31 Costs related to the Company's in-depth evaluation of, and conversion to, a REIT.
4
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded impairments of $22.4 million
2 During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges primarily related to three mainland commercial properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, A&B recorded non-cash impairment charges of $11.7 million related to certain non-active, long-term development projects in its Land Operations segment.
5 Acquisition/separation costs relate to the acquisitionMaterials & Construction segment. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges related to three mainland commercial properties classified as held for sale at December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges related to certain non-active, long-term development projects in its Land Operations segment.
3During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge related to its investment in Kukui‘ula due to the Company changing its strategy and no longer intending to hold its investment through the duration of Grace Pacific LLC on October 1, 2013.the project.
6
Income (loss) related to joint ventures include non-cash impairment and equity losses as follows: (1) $5.1 million in 2016 related to certain joint venture development projects in the Land Operations segment and a surplus parcel held by an unconsolidated joint venture in the Materials & Construction segment, (2) $0.3 million related to the sale of Crossroads in 2014, and (3) $6.3 million in 2013 related to the consolidation of The Shops at Kukui`ula.
74 Represents non-cash reductionsExcludes capital expenditures for real estate developments to be held and sold as real estate development inventory, which are classified in the carrying valueconsolidated statement of A&B’s KRS IIcash flows as operating activities.
5 2016 and Waihonu joint venture solar investments.2015 amounts include capital expenditures related to discontinued operations.
6 2019 and 2018 amounts are presented on a different basis from prior periods due to the adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified retrospective transition method.
7 2018 amounts are reflective of the early adoption of ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax benefits associated with joint venture solar investments are included inEffects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income tax benefit (expense).
8 Amounts in 2017 represent the sales of one office building in Maui, Hawai`i in January 2017 and one industrial property in California in November 2017. Amounts in 2016 represent the sales of two California properties and one Utah office property in June 2016. Amounts in 2015 represent the sales of one Colorado retail property in March 2015, one Texas office building in May 2015, and one Washington office building in December 2015.
9 Represents gross capital additions to and acquisitions in or for the commercial real estate portfolio, including gross tax-deferred property purchases, but excluding the assumption of debt, that are reflected as non-cash transactions in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
10
Excludes expenditures for real estate developments held for sale, which are classified as Cash Flows from Operating Activities within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and excludes investment in joint ventures classified as Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Operating cash flows for expenditures related to real estate developments were $20.8 million, $15.3 million, $7.2 million, $41.7 million, and $150.6 million for 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Investments in real estate joint ventures were $16.4 million, $20.8 million, $25.8 million, $28.7 million, and $22.2 million in 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
11 Includes amounts from discontinued operations.
12
Amounts recast to reflect the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, Interest- Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.

35





ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’SMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISOF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS
Statements in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the relevant forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, growth opportunities and competitive positions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements were made and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, prevailing market conditions and other factors related to the Company's REIT status and the Company business generallythose discussed in the Company's most recentPart I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K Form 10-Q and other filings withunder the Securities and Exchange Commission.heading "Risk Factors." The information in this Form 10-K should be evaluated in light of these important risk factors. We doThe Company does not undertake any obligation to update the Company'sany forward-looking statements.

The risk factors discussed in "Risk Factors" could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. There may be other risks and uncertainties that we are unable to predict at this time or that we currently do not expect to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Any such risks could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.
INTRODUCTION
Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is a supplement to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and provides additional information about A&B’sthe Company's business, recent developments, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources, cash flows, results of operations and how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect A&B’sour financial statements. MD&A is organized as follows:
Business Overview: This section provides a general description of the Company's business, as well as recent developments that management believes are important in understanding its results of operations and financial condition or in understanding anticipated future trends.
Critical Accounting Estimates: This section identifies and summarizes those accounting policies that significantly impact the Company's reported results of operations and financial condition and require significant judgment or estimates on the part of management in their application.
ConsolidatedResults of Operations: This section provides an analysis of the Company's consolidated results of operations.
Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment: This section provides an analysis of the Company's results of operations by business segment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources: This section provides a discussion of the Company's financial condition and an analysis of its cash flows, as well as a discussion of the Company's ability to fund its future commitments and ongoing operating activities through internal and external sources of capital.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements: This section provides a discussion of the Company’s contractual obligations and other commitments and contingencies that existed at December 31, 2019.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk: This section discusses how the Company monitors and manages exposure to potential gains and losses associated with changes in interest rates.
Business Overview:This section provides a general description of A&B’s business, as well as recent developmentsthis Form 10-K generally discusses 2019 and 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018. Discussions of 2017 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2018 and 2017 that A&B believes are importantnot included in understanding its resultsthis Form 10-K can be found in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of operationsFinancial Condition and financial condition or in understanding anticipated future trends.
Critical Accounting Estimates: This section identifies and summarizes those accounting policies that significantly impact A&B’s reported results of operations and financial condition and require significant judgment or estimates on the part of management in their application.
ConsolidatedResults of Operations: This section provides an analysisOperations" in Part II, Item 7 of A&B’s consolidated results of operationsthe Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the three yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
2018.
Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment: This section provides an analysis of A&B’s results of operations by business segment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources: This section provides a discussion of A&B’s financial condition and an analysis of A&B’s cash flows for three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, as well as a discussion of A&B’s ability to fund its future commitments and ongoing operating activities through internal and external sources of capital.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements: This section provides a discussion of A&B’s contractual obligations and other commitments and contingencies that existed at December 31, 2017.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk: This section discusses how A&B monitors and manages exposure to potential gains and losses associated with changes in interest rates.
Rounding:Amounts in the MD&A are rounded to the nearest tenth of a million. Accordingly, a recalculation of totals and percentages, if based on the reported data, and may be slightly different.

36





BUSINESS OVERVIEW
A&B, whose history dates back to 1870, is headquartered in Honolulu andThe Company operates through three reportable segments: Commercial Real Estate; Land Operations; and Materials & Construction. A description of each of the Company's reporting segments is as follows:
Commercial Real Estate ("CRE") functions as a vertically integrated real estate investment company with core competencies in investments and acquisitions (i.e., raising capital, identifying opportunities and acquiring properties); construction and development (i.e., designing and ground-up development of new properties or repositioning and redevelopment of existing properties); in-house leasing and property management (i.e., executing new and renegotiating renewal lease arrangements, managing its properties' day-to-day operations and maintaining positive tenant relationships); and asset management (i.e., maintaining, upgrading and enhancing its portfolio of high-quality improved properties). The segment's preferred asset classes include improved properties in retail and industrial spaces and also urban ground leases. Its focus within improved retail properties, in particular, is on grocery-anchored neighborhood shopping centers that meet the daily needs of Hawai‘i citizens. Through its core competencies and with its experience and relationships in Hawai‘i, the Company seeks to create special places and experiences for Hawai‘i residents as well as providing venues and opportunities for tenants to thrive. Income from this segment is principally generated by owning, operating and leasing real estate assets.
Land Operations involves the management and optimization of the Company's historical landholdings primarily through the following activities: planning and entitlement of real property to facilitate sales; selling undeveloped land; and other operationally-diverse legacy business activities to employ its landholdings at their highest and best use. Financial results from this segment are principally derived from real estate development sales, land parcel sales, income/loss from real estate joint ventures and other legacy business activities.
Materials & Construction ("M&C") operates as Hawai‘i's largest asphalt paving contractor and is one of the state's largest natural materials and infrastructure construction companies. Such activities are primarily conducted through the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Grace Pacific LLC ("Grace Pacific"), a materials and construction company in Hawai‘i.
TheAs a result of its conversion to a REIT and consequent de-emphasis of non-REIT operating businesses, the Company has completedestablished a conversion processstrategy to comply withsimplify its business, which includes ongoing efforts to accelerate the requirements to be treated as a REIT commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2017 (the “REIT Conversion”).
Commercial Real Estate
The Commercial Real Estate segment owns, operates and manages retail, industrial, and office properties in Hawai`i and on the mainland. The Commercial Real Estate segment also leases urban land in Hawai`i to third-party lessees.
Land Operations
The Land Operations segment actively manages the Company'smonetization of land and real estate-relatedrelated assets and deploys these assets to their highest and best use. Primary activitiesalso includes evaluating strategic options for the eventual monetization of the Land Operations segment include planning, zoning, financing, constructing, purchasing, managing, selling, and investing in real property; renewable energy; and diversified agribusiness activities.
Materials & Construction
Thesome or all of its Materials & Construction segment performs asphalt paving as prime contractor and subcontractor; imports and sells liquid asphalt; mines, processes and sells basalt aggregate; produces and sells asphaltic and ready-mix concrete; provides and sells various construction- and traffic-control-related products and manufactures and sells precast concrete products.

businesses.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
A&B’sThe Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, upon which the MD&A is based, requires that management exercise judgment when making estimates and assumptions about future events that may affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty and actual results will, inevitably,may differ from those critical accounting estimates. These differences could be material.
A&BManagement considers an accounting estimate to be critical if: (i)(a) the accounting estimate requires A&Bthe Company to make assumptions that are difficult or subjective about matters that were highly uncertain at the time that the accounting estimate was made, (b) changes in the estimate are reasonably likely to occur in periods subsequent to the period in which the estimate was made, or (c) different estimates by A&Bthe Company could have been used, and (ii) changes in those assumptions or estimates would have had a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of A&B.the Company. The critical accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of A&B’sthe Company’s financial statements are described below.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
A&B’s long-livedLong-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for possible impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In such an evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset are compared with the amount recorded for the asset to determine if its carrying value is not recoverable. If this review determines that the recorded value will not be recovered, the amount recorded for the asset is reduced to estimated fair value. These asset impairment analyses are highly subjective because they require management to make assumptions and apply considerable judgments to, among others,other things, estimates of the timing and amount of future cash flows, expected useful lives of the assets, uncertainty about future events, including changes in economic conditions, changes in operating performance, changes in the use of the assets and ongoing costs of maintenance and improvements of the assets, and thus, the


accounting estimates may change from period to period. If management uses different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future periods, A&B’s financial condition or its future operatingfinancial results could be materially impacted. A&B has evaluated certain long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for impairment.

37



During the fourth quarter of 2017, in connection with the Company's strategic decision to dispose of certain of its Mainland commercial properties and increase focus on its Hawai`i commercial portfolio, the Company classified several of its Mainland properties as held for sale. In connection with this determination,year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $22.4 million of impairments of real estate for three properties, as the expected sales proceeds, less costs to sell, were less than the carrying values of those assets.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, as a result of a change in its strategy for development activities, the Company recorded non-cashcumulative long-lived asset and finite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $11.7$40.6 million related to certain non-active, long-term development projects. The impairment loss recorded reducedits Materials and Construction segment.
In the carrying amounts toyear ended December 31, 2019, the estimated fair value, reflecting the change to the Company’s development-for-sale strategy to de-risk its portfolio byCompany did not pursuing certain long-term projects that were not in active development and instead focus on projects with a shorter-term lifespan, generally 3 to 5 years.
The impairment charges are presented within Impairmentrecognize any impairments of real estatelong-lived assets in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. There were no material long-lived asset impairment charges recorded in 2015. or finite-lived intangible assets.
Impairment of Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
A&B’sThe Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates are reviewed for impairment whenever there is evidence that fair value may be below carrying cost. An investment is written down to fair value if fair value is below carrying cost and the impairment is believed to be other-than-temporary. In evaluating the fair value of an investment and whether any identified impairment is other-than-temporary, significant estimates and considerable judgments are involved. These estimates and judgments are based, in part, on A&B’sthe Company’s current and future evaluation of economic conditions in general, as well as a joint venture’s current and future plans. Additionally, these impairment calculations are highly subjective because they also require management to make assumptions and apply judgments to estimates regarding the timing and amount of future cash flows and take into accountthat may consider various factors, including sales prices, development costs, market conditions and absorption rates, probabilities related to various cash flow scenarios, and appropriate discount rates based on the perceived risks, among others. In evaluating whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, A&Bthe Company considers all available information, including the length of time and extent of the impairment,but not limited to the financial condition and near-term prospects of the affiliate, A&B’sthe Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value, and projected industry and economic trends, among others. Changes in these and other assumptions could affect the projected operational results and fair value of the unconsolidated affiliates, and accordingly, may require valuation adjustments to A&B’sthe Company’s investments that may materially impact A&B’sthe Company’s financial condition or its future operating results. For example, if current market
Economic conditions deteriorate significantly or a joint venture’s plans change materially, impairment charges may be required in future periods, and those charges could be material.
The Company made investments of $23.8 million in 2014 and $15.4 million in 2016 in tax equity investments related to the construction and operation of (1) a 12-megawatt solar farm on Kauai and (2) two photovoltaic facilities with a combined capacity of 6.5 megawatts on Oahu, respectively. The Company recovers its investments primarily through tax credits and tax benefits, which are recorded in the Income tax expense (benefit) line item in the consolidated statements of operations. As these tax benefits were received and recognized, the Company recorded non-cash reductions of the investments' carrying value. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded net, non-cash reductions of the investments' carrying value of$2.6 million and $9.8 million, respectively.
Weakness in particular real estate markets, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing or development approvals, and changes in A&B’sthe Company’s development strategy, among other factors, may affect the value or feasibility of certain development projects owned by A&Bthe Company or by its joint ventures and could lead to additional impairment charges in the future.
During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company determined that its investment in Kukui‘ula was other-than-temporarily impaired due to the Company changing its strategy and no longer intending to hold its investment through the duration of the project. As a result, the Company estimated the fair value of its investment in Kukui‘ula using a discounted cash flow model and recorded a non-cash, other-than-temporary impairment of $186.8 million.
In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairments of investments in affiliates.
Goodwill
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually and whenever events or changes inbetween annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances indicatechange that it iswould more likely than not thatreduce the fair value of the reporting unit is less thanbelow its carrying amount. The goodwill impairment test estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using various methodologies, including an income approach that is based on a discounted cash flowsflow analysis and a market approach that involves the application of market-derived multiples. Valuations performed in conjunction with the Company's goodwill impairment tests for each reporting unit assumes that each is an unrelated business to be sold separately and independently from the other reporting units.
The discounted cash flow approach relies on a number of assumptions, including future macroeconomic conditions, market factors specific to the reporting unit, the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the business over an extended period of time long-term growth rates for the business, and a discount rate that considers the risks related to the amount and timing of the cash flows, among others. Under the market multiple methodology, the estimate of fair value is based on market multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) or revenues. When using market multiples of EBITDA or revenues, the Company must make judgments about the comparability of those multiples in closed and proposed transactions and comparability of multiples for guideline

38



similar companies. Additionally, the foregoing assumptions could be adversely impacted by any of the risks discussed in "Risk Factors."


If the results of the Company's test indicates that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

At December 31, 2017, the
The Company's goodwill totaled $102.3 million, primarily relatedis attributable to (1) the 2013 acquisition of Grace Pacific. Of the total goodwill, $93.6 millionrelates to three reporting units in the Materials & Construction segment. The valuationM&C segment - GPC (primarily consisting of eachthe Grace Pacific's quarry, paving, and liquid asphalt operations), GPRS (primarily consisting of Grace Pacific's roadway and maintenance solutions operations) and GPRM (primarily consisting of Grace Pacific's prestressed and precast concrete operations) - recognized in the acquisition of Grace Pacific in 2013 and (2) the CRE reporting unit, assumes that eachwhich is an unrelated businessalso the reportable segment.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, based on the results of the valuation performed in conjunction with the Company's annual goodwill impairment test in 2018, the carrying amounts of the GPC and GPRS reporting units exceeded their estimated fair values and goodwill was determined to be sold separatelyimpaired. The decline in fair value was due primarily to persisting, competitive market pressures that negatively affected sales and independently frommargins. As a result, the other reporting units. AsCompany recorded a non-cash impairment charge of the date of the last impairment test in$37.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2017,2018. The weighted-average discount rate used in the weighted average percentage (usingvaluation was 13.6%. The GPRM reporting units’unit goodwill was not deemed to be impaired as GPRM's carrying value)amount exceeded its fair value by approximately 33 percent.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, the Company was required to perform an interim impairment test for the goodwill in each of its three M&C reporting units due to the continued decline in M&C sales and margins in 2019, which resulted from continued, adverse market conditions. Based on the fair valuesresults of the valuation performed in conjunction with this test, the carrying amounts of the three M&C reporting units exceeded their carryingestimated fair values and goodwill was approximately 11 percent.determined to be impaired. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $49.7 million during the third quarter of 2019. The Company's fair value estimate for reporting units include a number of assumptions, including increased levels of road infrastructure spending by governmental and private entities, expectations about the Company's share of governmental contracts, and material input and labor costs, among others. If actual revenues are lower (for example, due to a lower level of government or private contracts bid or won by the reporting units), or costs are higher than anticipated and cannot be recovered as part of the price of the work performed, as well as other factors that result in adverse changes in the key assumptionsweighted-average discount rate used in the fair value estimates mentioneddiscounted cash flow approach of the valuation was 12.7%.
Other than those noted above, the fair value ofCompany did not record any additional impairments to the Company'sgoodwill in its reporting units could be negatively impacted.
Revenue Recognition for Certain Long-Term Real Estate Developments
As discussed induring the year ended December 31, 2019. Subsequent to such impairments, as of December 31, 2019, the Company did not have any material goodwill at any of its reporting units that were at risk (see Note 222 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, revenues from real estate sales are generally recognized when sales are closed and title, risks and rewards pass to the buyer. For certain real estate sales, A&B and its joint venture partners account for revenues on long-term real estate development projects that have continuing post-closing involvement, such as Kukui'ula, using the percentage-of-completion method. Following this method, the amount of revenue recognized is based on the percentage of development costs that have been incurred through the reporting period in relation to total expected development cost associated with the subject property. Accordingly, if material changes to total expected development costs or revenues occur, A&B’sconsolidated financial condition or its future operating results could be materially impacted.statements).
Recent Accounting PronouncementsNEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements for a full description of the impact of recently issued accounting standards, which is incorporated herein by reference, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on A&B’sthe Company's results of operations and financial condition.

39





CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.the Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto. Amounts in this narrative are rounded
Net income (loss) attributable to millions, but per-share calculationsA&B shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and percentages2017 were calculated based on thousands. Accordingly, a recalculation of some per-share amounts and percentages, if based on the reported data, may be slightly different than the more accurate amounts included herein. The financial information included in the following table and narrative reflects the presentation of the HC&S sugar operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.follows:
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)2017 Change 2016 Change 2015
Operating revenue$425.5
 9.8% $387.5
 (18.0)% $472.8
Operating costs and expenses406.0
 18.8% 341.7
 (9.8)% 378.8
Operating income19.5
 (57.4)% 45.8
 (51.3)% 94.0
Other income (expense), net(18.9) (1.6)% (18.6) NM 4.9
Income tax benefit (expense)218.2
 436X 0.5
 NM (37.0)
Net gain (loss) on the sale of improved property, net of income taxes9.3
 86.0% 5.0
 NM (1.1)
Income from continuing operations228.1
 7X 32.7
 (46.2)% 60.8
Discontinued operations (net of income taxes)2.4
 NM (41.1) (38.4)% (29.7)
Net income (loss)230.5
 NM (8.4) NM 31.1
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest(2.2) (22.2)% (1.8) (20.0)% (1.5)
Net income (loss) attributable to A&B$228.3
 NM $(10.2) NM $29.6
   
 
 
  
Basic earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations$4.63
 7X $0.66
 (42.8)% $1.15
Basic earnings (loss) per share - discontinued operations0.05
 NM (0.84) (37.7)% (0.61)
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders$4.68
 NM $(0.18) NM $0.54
   
   
  
Diluted earnings (loss) per share - continuing operations$4.30
 7X $0.65
 (43.0)% $1.14
Diluted earnings (loss) per share - discontinued operations0.04
 NM (0.83) (38.3)% (0.60)
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders$4.34
 NM $(0.18) NM $0.54
        2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
(in millions, except per share amounts) 2019 2018 2017 $ % $ %
Operating revenue $435.2
 $644.4
 $425.5
 (209.2) (32.5)% 218.9
 51.4 %
Cost of operations (340.9) (382.4) (302.0) 41.5
 10.9 % (80.4) (26.6)%
Selling, general and administrative (58.9) (61.2) (66.4) 2.3
 3.8 % 5.2
 7.8 %
REIT evaluation/conversion costs 
 
 (15.2) 
  % 15.2
 100.0 %
Impairment of assets (49.7) (79.4) (22.4) 29.7
 37.4 % (57.0) 3X
Gain (loss) on the sale of commercial real estate properties 
 51.4
 9.3
 (51.4) (100.0)% 42.1
 5X
Operating income (loss) (14.3) 172.8
 28.8
 (187.1) NM
 144.0
 5X
Income (loss) related to joint ventures 5.3
 (4.1) 7.2
 9.4
 NM
 (11.3) NM
Impairment of equity method investment 
 (188.6) 
 188.6
 100.0 % (188.6)  %
Interest and other income (expense), net 3.2
 2.3
 (0.5) 0.9
 39.1 % 2.8
 NM
Interest expense (33.1) (35.3) (25.6) 2.2
 6.2 % (9.7) (37.9)%
Income tax benefit (expense) 2.0
 (16.3) 218.2
 18.3
 NM
 (234.5) NM
Income (loss) from continuing operations (36.9) (69.2) 228.1
 32.3
 46.7 % (297.3) NM
Discontinued operations (net of income taxes) (1.5) (0.6) 2.4
 (0.9) (150.0)% (3.0) NM
Net income (loss) (38.4) (69.8) 230.5
 31.4
 45.0 % (300.3) NM
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.0
 (2.2) (2.2) 4.2
 NM
 
  %
Net income (loss) attributable to A&B $(36.4) $(72.0) $228.3
 35.6
 49.4 % (300.3) NM
               
Earnings (loss) per share available to A&B shareholders              
Basic - Continuing operations $(0.49) $(1.01) $4.63
 (0.52) (51.5)% 5.64
 NM
Basic - Discontinued operations (0.02) (0.01) 0.05
 0.01
 100.0 % 0.06
 NM
  $(0.51) $(1.02) $4.68
 (0.51) (50.0)% 5.70
 NM
               
Diluted - Continuing operations $(0.49) $(1.01) $4.30
 (0.52) (51.5)% 5.31
 NM
Diluted - Discontinued operations (0.02) (0.01) 0.04
 0.01
 100.0 % 0.05
 NM
  $(0.51) $(1.02) $4.34
 (0.51) (50.0)% 5.36
 NM
               
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding              
Basic 72.2
 70.6
 49.2
        
Diluted 72.2
 70.6
 53.0
        
On November 16, 2017Operating revenue for 2019 decreased 32.5%, or $209.2 million, to $435.2 million due primarily to the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a special distribution on its shares of common stock in an aggregate amount of $783 million, or approximately $15.92 per share (the "Special Distribution"), payable in cash and sharesimpact of the Company's stock. The Special Distribution representsbulk sale of Maui agricultural land in December 2018 that did not reoccur in 2019 (further described in Note 21 to the Company's previously undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits ("E&P") accumulated prior to January 1, 2017, which were required to be distributed in connection with the Company's conversion to a REITconsolidated financial statements). Consolidated cost of operations for the 2017 taxable year, the Company's REIT taxable income for the 2017 taxable year and a substantial portion of the Company's estimated REIT taxable income for the 2018 taxable year. The Special Distribution was paid on January 23, 2018. Shareholders had an opportunity to elect to receive the Special Distribution in the form of cash or additional shares of common stock, subject to a limit of $156.6 million of cash. As the deadline for the common shareholders' election was January 12, 2018, subsequent to December 31, 2017, the total Special Distribution of $783 million was included in the computation of the Company's diluted earnings (loss) per share.

2017 vs. 2016
Operating revenue for 2017 increased 9.8%2019 decreased 10.9%, or $38.0$41.5 million, to $425.5$340.9 million, due primarily due to higher revenue fromdecreases in costs incurred by the Land Operations and Materials & Construction and Land Operations segments. The reasons for business and segment-specific year-to-year fluctuations in operating revenue and cost of operations as they pertain to fluctuations in segment operating profit are further described below in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment.
Operating costsSelling, general and expensesadministrative for 2017 increased 18.8%2019 decreased 3.8%, or $64.3$2.3 million, to $406.0$58.9 million due primarily due to increaseslower management consulting expenses and lower personnel-related costs incurred in operating expenses incurred by the Land Operations andcurrent year as compared to 2018.
During the third quarter of 2019, the Company recorded an impairment to goodwill in its Materials & Construction segments, as well as impairment charges recorded duringsegment of $49.7 million due to the continued decline in sales and margins resulting from adverse market conditions. During the fourth quarter of 20172018, the Company recorded impairments of $79.4 million related to certain, mainland commercial properties.goodwill and long-lived assets for the quarry & paving operations in its Materials & Construction segment. The reasons for the operating costbusiness and expense changessegment-specific year-to-year fluctuations are further described below, by business segment, in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment. Operating costs and expenses for 2017 and 2016 also included costs of $15.2 million and $9.5 million, respectively, related to the Company's REIT conversion.

40




Other income (expense), net was a net expense of $18.9 million in 2017 compared to a net expense of $18.6 million in 2016. The change from the prior year was primarily due to an increase of $3.5 million in interest income, a $1.6 million decrease in pension and post retirement other expense and a $7.2 million decrease in the adjustment to reduce the carrying amount of tax equity solar investments. These increases were offset by $12.0 million, lower income from joint ventures.
Income tax benefit (expense) was a benefit of $218.2 million in 2017, primarily reflected the reversal of approximately $223.0 million of net deferred liabilities in connection with the Company's conversion to a REIT, partially offset by approximately $3.0 million due to the impact of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Income tax benefit of $0.5 million for 2016 reflected a lower effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily driven by the non-refundable federal tax credit related to the Company’s Waihonu tax equity solar investment.
Net gainGain (loss) on sale of improved property, net of income taxes increased 86.0%, or $4.3commercial real estate properties was zero in 2019 and $51.4 million in 2018. Activity in 2018 related to $9.3 million due to the aggregate gain realized on the sales of two commercialnine improved properties during 2017, asand a ground lease that occurred in 2018.
Income (loss) related to joint ventures was $5.3 million of income in 2019 compared to the net gaina loss of $5.0$4.1 million on commercial property sales during 2016. Additionally, following our conversion to a REIT, sales of improved properties are no longer subject to taxation.
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest increased $0.4 million in 2017 compared to 2016. The noncontrolling interest represents third-party noncontrolling interests in two entities consolidated by Grace and in which Grace owns a 70 percent and 51 percent share.
2016 vs. 2015
Operating revenue for 2016 decreased 18.0%, or $85.3 million, to $387.5 million,2018, primarily due to lower revenue fromjoint venture activity in the Land Operations and Materials & Construction segments, offset by increased revenue from the Commercial Real Estate segment. The reasons for business-business and segment-specific year-to-year fluctuations in revenue are further described below in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment.
Operating costsImpairment of equity method investments was zero in 2019 and expenses for 2016 decreased 9.8%, or $37.1$188.6 million in 2018. Activity in 2018 was related to $341.7 million, primarily due to lower operating expenses incurred byimpairments recognized in the Land Operations and Materials & Construction segments.segment. The reasons for the operating costbusiness and expense changessegment-specific year-to-year fluctuations are further described below, by business segment, in the Analysis of Operating Revenue and Profit by Segment. Operating costs and expenses
Income tax (expense) benefit for 2016 also included costs2019 was a benefit of $9.5$2.0 million compared to an expense of $16.3 million for 2018. Activity in 2018 was primarily driven by the establishment of a valuation allowance related to the Company's evaluation of a potential REIT conversion.
Other income (expense), net was an expense of $18.6 million in 2016 compared with income of $4.9 million in 2015. The change in other income (expense) fromdeferred tax assets on the prior year was primarilybalance sheet due to $17.6 million lower income from joint ventures, and a $7.2 million increasecumulative losses incurred in the adjustment to reduce the carrying amount of tax equity solar investments, offset by a $1.0 million increase in interest income.
Income taxes benefit (expense) was a slight benefit in 2016 compared to expense in 2015, due to lower earnings in 2016 as compared to 2015. Income taxes also reflected a lower effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily driven by the non-refundable federal tax credit related to the Company’s solar investment.
Net gain (loss) on sale of improved property, net of income taxes was$5.0 million due to commercial property sales during 2016, as compared to the net loss of $1.1 million on commercial property sales during 2015.
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest increased $0.3 million in 2016 compared to 2015. The noncontrolling interest represents third-party noncontrolling interests in two entities consolidated by Grace and in which Grace owns a 70 percent and 51 percent share.Company's non-REIT operating businesses.


41



ANALYSIS OF OPERATING REVENUE AND PROFIT BY SEGMENT
Additional detailed information related to the operations and financial performance of the Company’s Operating Segments is included in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8). The following informationanalysis should be read in relation toconjunction with the information contained therein.consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.
Commercial Real Estate
Financial Results
Operating profit (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 vs. 2016were as follows:
(dollars in millions)2017 2016 Change
Commercial Real Estate operating revenue$136.9
 $134.7
 1.6%
Commercial Real Estate operating costs and expenses(75.5) (79.0) 4.4%
Selling, general and administrative(6.8) (2.5) (172.0)%
Intersegment operating revenue, net1
2.5
 2.0
 25.0%
Impairment of real estate assets(22.4) 
 NM
Other income/(expense), net(0.3) (0.4) 25.0%
Commercial Real Estate operating profit$34.4
 $54.8
 (37.2)%
Operating profit margin25.1% 40.7%
 
Cash Net Operating Income ("Cash NOI")2
    
   Hawai`i$74.0
 $69.8
 6.0%
   Mainland10.9
 13.2
 (17.6)%
Total$84.8
 $83.0
 2.2%
Same-Store Cash Net Operating Income ("Same-Store Cash NOI")2
     
   Hawai`i$67.4
 $64.4
 4.5%
   Mainland8.3
 7.7
 6.8%
Total$75.6
 $72.2
 4.8%
Gross Leasable Area ("GLA") (million sq. ft.) - Improved (at year end)     
Hawai`i3.0
 2.9
  
Mainland1.0
 1.8
  
Total improved4.0
 4.7
  
Hawai`i ground leases (acres at year end)117
 106
  
        2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 2017 $ % $ %
Commercial Real Estate operating revenue $160.6
 $140.3
 $136.9
 20.3
 14.5 % 3.4
 2.5 %
Commercial Real Estate operating costs and expenses (89.0) (77.2) (75.5) (11.8) (15.3)% (1.7) (2.3)%
Selling, general and administrative (10.1) (6.9) (6.8) (3.2) (46.4)% (0.1) (1.5)%
Intersegment operating revenues1
 2.7
 2.6
 2.5
 0.1
 3.8 % 0.1
 4.0 %
Impairment of assets 
 
 (22.4) 
  % 22.4
 100.0 %
Interest and other income (expense), net 2.0
 (0.3) (0.3) 2.3
 NM
 
  %
Commercial Real Estate operating profit (loss) $66.2
 $58.5
 $34.4
 7.7
 13.2 % 24.1
 70.1 %
Operating profit (loss) margin 41.2% 41.7% 25.1%        
               
Cash Net Operating Income ("Cash NOI")2
              
Hawai‘i $104.2
 $84.7
 $73.8
 19.5
 23.0 % 10.9
 14.8 %
Mainland 
 1.5
 10.8
 (1.5) (100.0)% (9.3) (86.1)%
Total Cash NOI $104.2
 $86.2
 $84.6
 18.0
 20.9 % 1.6
 1.9 %
               
Same-Store Cash Net Operating Income
("Same-Store Cash NOI")2
 $78.5
 $74.6
 $71.5
 3.9
 5.2 % 3.1
 4.3 %
Gross Leasable Area ("GLA") (million sq. ft.) - Improved (end of period)              
Hawai‘i 3.9
 3.5
 3.0
 0.4
 11.4 % 0.5
 16.7 %
Mainland 
 
 1.0
 
  % (1.0) (100.0)%
Total Improved 3.9
 3.5
 4.0
 0.4
 11.4 % (0.5) (12.5)%
Ground leases (acres at end of period) 153.8
 108.7
 117.0
 45.1
 41.5 % (8.3) (7.1)%
1 Intersegment operating revenue, net for Commercial Real Estate is primarily from ourthe Materials & Construction segment and is eliminated in ourthe consolidated results of operations.
2 Refer to page 45 or a discussion of management's use of a non-GAAP financial measure and the required reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures.
Commercial Real Estate operating revenue for 2017 was 1.6% percent higher than 2016, primarily attributable to the increases in Hawai`i same-store rents. "Same-store" refers to properties that were owned and operated for the entirety of the prior calendar year. The same-store pool excludes properties under development or redevelopment and also excludes properties acquired or sold during the comparable reporting periods, including stabilized properties. New developments and redevelopments are moved into the same-store pool upon one full calendar year of stabilized operation, which is typically upon attainment of market occupancy.
Operating profit was 37.2% lower in 2017, compared with 2016, principally due to aggregate impairment charges of $22.4 million related to certain of its U.S. Mainland properties that were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017.

42



The Company's commercial portfolio's occupancy and same-store occupancy percentage summarized by geographic location and property type as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
Occupancy
            
 As of December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2016 Percentage Point Change
 Hawai`iMainlandTotal Hawai`iMainlandTotal Hawai`iMainlandTotal
Retail93.1%96.9%93.4% 92.8%96.1%93.1% 0.30.80.3
Industrial95.1%100.0%96.5% 96.6%89.4%92.5% (1.5)10.64.0
Office89.1%88.0%88.3% 84.7%90.5%88.7% 4.4(2.5)(0.4)
Total93.5%94.1%93.6% 93.4%90.4%92.2% 0.13.71.4
Same-Store Occupancy
       
 As of December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2016 Percentage Point Change
 Hawai`iMainlandTotal Hawai`iMainlandTotal Hawai`iMainlandTotal
Retail92.9%96.9%93.3% 92.5%96.1%92.9% 0.40.80.4
Industrial95.3%100.0%96.7% 96.6%100.0%97.7% (1.3)(1.0)
Office86.5%88.0%87.6% 87.7%90.5%89.8% (1.2)(2.5)(2.2)
Total93.3%94.1%93.5% 93.6%95.1%94.0% (0.3)(1.0)(0.5)
In 2017, the Company signed or renewed 211 leases or 909,422 square feet, at an average spread of 13.9%, and the change in average annual rental income on renewals, including tenant concessions, if any, as compared to the prior rental income was approximately 13.6%. Total tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions were $14.3 million in 2017 and $6.6 million in 2016.
GLA was 4.0 million square feet at December 31, 2017, compared to 4.7 million square feet as of December 31, 2016 as a result of the following activity:
Dispositions Acquisitions
Date Property GLA Date Property GLA
11/17 Midstate 99 Distribution Center 790,200
 6/17 Honokohau Industrial 73,200
1/17 The Maui Clinic Building 16,600
      
  Total dispositions 806,800
   Total improved acquisitions 73,200

43



2016 vs. 2015
(dollars in millions)2016 2015 Change
Commercial Real Estate operating revenue$134.7
 $133.6
 0.8%
Commercial Real Estate operating costs and expenses(79.0) (80.4) 1.7%
Selling, general and administrative(2.5) (1.4) (78.6)%
Intersegment operating revenue, net1
2.0
 1.8
 11.1%
Other income (expense), net(0.4) (0.4) —%
Commercial Real Estate operating profit$54.8
 $53.2
 3.0%
Operating profit margin40.7% 39.8% 
Cash NOI2
     
   Hawai`i$69.8
 $62.6
 11.5%
   Mainland13.2
 16.7
 (21.0)%
Total$83.0
 $79.3
 4.7%
GLA - Improved (at year end)     
Hawai`i2.9
 2.7
  
Mainland1.8
 2.2
  
Total improved4.7
 4.9
  
Hawai`i ground leases (acres at year end)106
 106
  
1 Intersegment operating revenue for Commercial Real Estate is primarily from our Materials & Construction segment and is eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.
2 Refer to page 4538 for a discussion of management's use of a non-GAAP financial measure and the required reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures.
Commercial Real Estate operating revenue increased 14.5%, or $20.3 million, to $160.6 million for 2016 was 0.8 percent higher than 2015, principally duethe year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018. Commercial Real Estate operating profit increased 13.2%, or $7.7 million, to $66.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018. The increase in operating revenue impactand operating profit from the acquisitionsprior year is primarily driven by the impact of Manoa Marketplace (January 2016)acquired properties, redevelopment/new development projects commencing operations and Aikahi Shopping Center leasehold improvements (May 2015),new tenant leases, as well as improved performancean increase in Same-Store rents.


Acquired Properties - Acquired properties contributing to a net increase in operating profit in the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018, include:
i.Current year acquisitions of ground lease interests in the land under the Home Depot warehouse store in the Iwilei submarket of Honolulu in March 2019 and land in Kapolei Business Park West, commonly known as the Honolulu Authority of Rapid Transportation (HART) precast yard, in April 2019. These ground leases contributed $3.1 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.
ii.Current/prior year industrial acquisitions of three Class-A warehouse buildings in Kapolei on Oahu in April 2019/December 2018. These industrial properties contributed $2.2 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.
iii.Current year retail portfolio acquisitions of Queens' MarketPlace on Hawai‘i (island) in May 2019 and Waipouli Town Center on Kauai in May 2019, as well as the continued stabilization of February 2018 acquisitions of three retail centers in Hawai‘i (Pu‘unene Shopping Center, Laulani Village Shopping Center and Hokulei Village Shopping Center). These retail properties contributed $1.4 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.
Redevelopment/New Development - Redevelopment/new development projects impacting current year operating profit due to the commencement of operations include Lau Hala Shops in Kailua on Oahu (commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2018) and Ho‘okele Shopping Center on Maui (commenced operations in the third quarter of 2019). These retail properties contributed approximately $1.7 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.
Same-Store Rent - Growth in Same-Store rents in the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily driven by Pearl Highlands Center and Kailua Retail on Oahu resulting from higher occupancy and strong comparable leasing spreads, respectively. These two properties contributed approximately $1.8 million of additional gross margin in 2019 as compared to 2018.
The increase in operating revenue and gross margin from Hawai`i properties,these drivers was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization related to the disposition of three Mainlandacquired properties, in 2015 and three Mainland properties in 2016.
Operating profit was 3.0 percentas well as higher in 2016, compared with 2015, principally due to improved performance from Hawai`i properties and the favorable impact from the previously mentioned Hawai`i acquisitions, partially offset by the Mainland dispositions and higher selling, general and administrative expenses due to approximately $1.3 million of transaction costs primarilyexpense related to growth in the acquisitionoverall segment portfolio driven, in part, by an increase in personnel-related costs in the segment operations related to such growth.
Commercial Real Estate Portfolio Acquisitions and Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company's acquisitions of Manoa Marketplaceimproved properties were as follows ($ in 2016.millions):
GLA was 4.7 million
Acquisitions
Property Location Date Purchase Price GLA (SF)
Kapolei Enterprise Center Oahu, HI 4/19 $26.8
 93,000
Waipouli Town Center Kauai, HI 5/19 17.8
 56,600
Queens' MarketPlace Hawai‘i (island), HI 5/19 90.3
 134,700
Total     $134.9
 284,300
In addition, the Company made acquisitions of ground lease interests in land during the year ended December 31, 2019 as follows ($ in millions):
Acquisitions
Property Location Date Purchase Price Acres
Home Depot Iwilei Oahu, HI 3/19 $42.4
 9.0
Kapolei Business Park West Oahu, HI 4/19 41.1
 36.4
Total     $83.5
 45.4
There were no dispositions of CRE improved properties or ground lease interests during the year ended December 31, 2019.


Leasing Activity
In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company signed 91 new leases and 123 renewal leases, covering 565.4 thousand square feet atof GLA. The 91 new leases comprise 272.6 thousand square feet with an average annual base rent of $25.21 per square foot. Signed new leases resulted in an 11.4% average base rent increase over comparable expiring leases. The 123 renewal leases comprise 292.8 thousand square feet with an average annual base rent of $28.57 per square foot. Signed renewal leases resulted in a 7.4% average base rent increase over comparable expiring leases.
Leasing activity summarized by property type for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared2019 was as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
 LeasesGLAABR/SFRent Spread
Retail113
239,887
41.02
8.8%
Industrial83
285,719
14.95
7.0%
Office18
39,841
28.32
5.3%
Occupancy
Occupancy represents the percentage of square footage leased and commenced to 4.9 million square feetgross leasable space at the end of the period reported. The Company's commercial real estate portfolio's occupancy and Same-Store occupancy percentage summarized by property type as of December 31, 20152019 and 2018 was as a result of the following activity:follows:
Dispositions Acquisitions
Date Property GLA Date Property GLA
6/16 Ninigret Office Park 185,500
 12/16 2927 East Manoa Road (Ground Lease) N/A
6/16 Gateway Oaks 59,700
 1/16 Manoa Marketplace 139,300
6/16 Prospect Park 163,300
      
  Total dispositions 408,500
   Total improved acquisitions 139,300
Occupancy
  As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018 Percentage Point Change
Retail 93.3% 93.4% (0.1)
Industrial 95.3% 90.1% 5.2
Office 90.9% 93.8% (2.9)
Total 93.9% 92.4% 1.5
       
Same-Store Occupancy
  As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018 Percentage Point Change
Retail 94.4% 93.3% 1.1
Industrial 94.1% 90.1% 4.0
Office 90.9% 93.8% (2.9)
Total 94.1% 92.2% 1.9

44



Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The Company uses non-GAAP measures when evaluating operating performance because management believes that they provide additional insight into the Company’sCompany's and segments' core operating results, and/or the underlying business trends affecting performance on a consistent and comparable basis from period to period. These measures generally are provided to investors as an additional means of evaluating the performance of ongoing core operations.
Cash Net Operating Income ("Cash NOI")NOI is a non-GAAP measure used by the Companyinternally in evaluating the CRE segment’s operatingunlevered performance as it is an indicator of the return on property investment,Company's Commercial Real Estate portfolio. The Company believes Cash NOI provides useful information to investors regarding the Company's financial condition and provides a method of comparing performanceresults of operations on an unlevered basis, over time.because it reflects only those cash income and expense items that are incurred at the property level, and when compared across periods, can be used to determine trends in earnings of the Company's properties as this measure is not affected by non-cash revenue and expense recognition items, the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses or other gains or losses that relate to the Company's ownership of properties. The Company believes the exclusion of these items from operating profit (loss) is useful because the resulting measure captures the actual cash-based revenue generated and actual expenses incurred in operating the Company's Commercial Real Estate portfolio as well as trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, and operating costs. Cash NOI should be not be viewed as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.
Cash NOI is calculated asrepresents total propertyCommercial Real Estate cash-based operating revenues, less direct property-related operating expenses. The calculation of Cash NOI excludes straight-line rent adjustments, amortizationthe impact of favorable/unfavorable leases, amortization of tenant incentives, general and administrative expenses, impairments of real estate, and depreciation and amortization (including amortization of maintenance capital, tenant improvements and leasing commissions); straight-line lease adjustments (including amortization of lease incentives);


amortization of favorable/unfavorable lease assets/liabilities; lease termination income; other income and expense, net; selling, general, administrative and other expenses; and impairment of commercial real estate assets.
The Company reports Cash NOI and Occupancy on a Same-Store basis, which includes the results of properties that were owned and operated for the entirety of the current and prior calendar year. The Same-Store pool excludes properties under development or redevelopment and also excludes properties acquired or sold during either of the comparable reporting periods. While there is management judgment involved in classifications, new developments and redevelopments are moved into the Same-Store pool after one full calendar year of stabilized operation. New developments and redevelopments are generally considered stabilized upon the initial attainment of 90% occupancy. Properties included in held for sale are excluded from Same-Store.
The Company believes that reporting on a Same-Store basis provides investors with additional information regarding the operating performance of comparable assets versus from other factors (such as the effect of developments, redevelopments, acquisitions or dispositions).
The Company’sCompany's methods of calculating non-GAAP measures may differ from methods employed by other companies and thus may not be comparable to such other companies.

A reconciliation of Commercial Real Estate operating profit (loss) to Commercial Real Estate Cash NOI isfor the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
Commercial Real Estate Operating Profit $34.4
 $54.8
 $53.2
(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 2017
Commercial Real Estate Operating Profit (Loss) $66.2
 $58.5
 $34.4
Plus: Depreciation and amortization 26.0
 28.4
 28.9
 36.7
 28.0
 26.0
Less: Straight-line lease adjustments (1.6) (2.1) (2.3) (5.1) (4.0) (1.6)
Plus: Lease incentive amortization 
 0.1
 0.1
Less: Favorable/(unfavorable) lease amortization (2.9) (3.3) (3.6) (1.6) (1.9) (2.9)
Less: Termination income (1.7) (0.1) (0.7) (0.1) (1.1) (1.7)
Plus: Other (income)/expense, net 0.3
 0.4
 (0.5) (2.0) 0.3
 0.3
Plus: Impairment of real estate assets 22.4
 
 
Plus: Impairment of assets 
 
 22.4
Plus: Selling, general, administrative and other expenses 7.9
 4.8
 4.2
 10.1
 6.9
 7.9
Commercial Real Estate Cash NOI $84.8
 $83.0
 $79.3
Less: Legal costs previously capitalized1
 
 (0.5) (0.2)
Cash NOI as adjusted 104.2
 86.2
 84.6
Less Cash NOI from acquisitions, dispositions, and other adjustments (25.7) (11.6) (13.1)
Same-Store Cash NOI as adjusted 78.5
 74.6
 71.5
1 Represents legal costs related to leasing activity that were previously capitalized when incurred and recognized as amortization expense over the term of the lease contract. Upon the Company's adoption of ASC 842, Leases, on January 1, 2019, such legal costs are directly expensed as operating costs and are included in Cash NOI. For comparability purposes, Cash NOI for the prior periods presented has been adjusted to include legal fees in conformity with Cash NOI for 2019.
Land Operations
2017vs. 2016 vs. 2015
Direct year-over-year comparison of the Land Operations segment results may not provide a consistent, measurable indicator of future performance because results from period to period are significantly affected by the mix and timing of property sales. Operating results, by virtue of each project’sThe asset class geography and timing are inherently variable. Earnings from joint venture investments are not included in segment revenue, but are included in operating profit. The mix of real estate sales in any year or quartergiven period can be diverse and canmay include developed residential real estate, developable subdivision lots, undeveloped land andor property sold under threat of condemnation. TheFurther, the timing of property or parcel sales can significantly affect operating results in a given period.
Additionally, the operating profit reported in each period does not necessarily follow a percentage of sales trend because the cost basis of property sold can differ significantly between transactions. For example, the sale of undeveloped land and vacant parcels in Hawai`Hawai‘i generally provides higher margins than does the sale of developed property, due to the low historical cost basis of the Company’sCompany's land owned in Hawai`Hawai‘i. Consequently,
As a result, direct year-over-year comparison of the Land Operations segment results may not provide a consistent, measurable indicator of future performance. Further, Land Operations revenue trends, cash flows from the sales of real estate, and the amount of real estate held for sale on the Company's balance sheet do not necessarily indicate future profitability trends for this segment. Additionally, the


Land Operations operating profit reported in each quarter does not necessarily follow a percentage of sales trend because(loss) for the cost basis of property sold can differ significantly between transactions.

45



years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
(in millions)2017 2016 2015
Development sales revenue$35.0
 $12.5
 $75.0
Unimproved/other property sales revenue25.6
 28.7
 26.3
Other operating revenues1
23.9
 20.7
 18.9
Total Land Operations operating revenue84.5
 61.9
 120.2
Operating expenses(73.9) (46.3) (83.8)
Impairment of real estate assets
 (11.7) 
Earnings from joint ventures3.3
 15.1
 30.2
Reductions in solar investments, net(2.6) (9.8) (2.6)
Interest and other income2.9
 (2.2) (2.3)
Total Land Operations operating profit$14.2
 $7.0
 $61.7
Land Operations operating profit margin16.8% 11.3% 51.3%
(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 2017
Development sales revenue $57.2
 $54.3
 $35.0
Unimproved/other property sales revenue 32.4
 210.5
 25.6
Other operating revenues1
 24.5
 24.7
 23.9
Total Land Operations operating revenue 114.1
 289.5
 84.5
Land operations costs and operating expenses (97.9) (124.0) (73.9)
Impairment of assets 
 (1.6) 
Impairment of equity method investment 
 (188.6) 
Earnings (loss) from joint ventures 3.9
 (4.7) 3.3
Interest and other income (expense), net 0.7
 2.7
 0.3
Total Land Operations operating profit (loss) $20.8
 $(26.7) $14.2
1
Other operating revenues includes revenue related to trucking, renewable energy and diversified agriculture. In December 2016, the Company completed its final sugar harvest and ceased its sugar operations. The results of sugar operations have been presented within discontinued operations for all periods presented.
2017: 1 Other operating revenues includes revenue related to trucking, renewable energy and diversified agriculture.
2019: Land Operations revenue of $114.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $84.5driven by development sales activity which included three of the remaining Kahala Avenue acres; 44 of the remaining units for the Company's Kamalani project in Kihei, Maui; nine acres at Maui Business Park (Phase II); unimproved/other property sales activity related to the sale of land and related property and rights in Wailea, Maui; and the sale of unimproved property of approximately 800 acres of agricultural land on Maui.
2018: Land Operations revenue of $289.5 million andwas significantly impacted by the bulk sale of Maui agricultural land in December 2018 (further described in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements). Land Operations revenue also included sales of 91 units for the Company's Kamalani project in Kihei, Maui, the sale of one Kahala Avenue parcel, 35 unitsthe sale of 313 acres to the State of Hawai‘i for the expansion of the Kahului airport on Maui, a 293-acre parcel in Haiku,the sale of 262 acres to the County of Maui a 273-acre parcel onfor the islandexpansion of Kauai, six lots at Maui Businessthe Kula Agricultural Park a 146-acre parcel in Kihei, Maui, a three-acre parcel in Wailea, Maui, and a 0.8-acre vacant, urban parcel on Maui, along withand trucking service and power sales revenues.
Operating profitloss for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $14.2$26.7 million and included the gross profit of $162.2 million related to the Agricultural Land Sale, the sale of a 313 acre land parcel in Kahului, Maui, and a decrease in earnings from the Company's real estate development-related joint ventures and investments. The segment results also included equity method investment impairments of $188.6 million, primarily related to the Company's Kukui‘ula joint venture. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company changed its strategy and will no longer hold its investment in Kukui‘ula long-term, although it remains committed to positioning the project for longer term success and transition. As a $2.6 million non-cash reductionresult of the change in intent, the Company concluded that the carrying value of the Company's Solar Investmentits investment in Kukui‘ula was not recoverable and $2.9recognized a non-cash impairment of $186.8 million of interest and other income primarily related to notes receivable on a third-party development-for-sale project that was repaid during the fourth quarter of 2017.
2016: Land Operations revenue was $61.9 million, principally related to the sales of three vacant parcels of $27.7 million on Maui, two residential lots on Oahu of $6.9 million, The Collection developer fee of $4.4 million, 0.5 acres at Maui Business Park II of $1.0 million, trucking service revenue, and power sales revenue.
Operating profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 included joint venture residential sales of 451 residential units at The Collection, 14 units at Kukui'ula on Kauai and 10 units at Ka Milo on the Island of Hawai`i. The margin on these sales was partially offset by joint venture expenses. During the fourth quarter of 2016, as a result of a change in its strategy for development activities, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $11.7 million related to certain non-active, long-term development projects. The impairment loss recorded reduced the carrying amounts to the estimated fair value, reflecting the change to the Company’s development-for-sale strategy to de-risk its portfolio by not pursuing certain long-term projects that were not in active development and instead focus on projects with a shorter-term investment period, generally 3 to 5 years. Operating profit includes the reduction of the Company's solar energy investments of $9.8 million in 2016.
2015: Land Operations segment revenue was $120.2 million, principally related to the sales of five residential lots on Oahu, 18.4 acres at Maui Business Park II, 10 parcels on Maui, three Kauai parcels, and a parcel in Santa Barbara, California.
2018. Operating profit also included joint venture residential salesincludes interest and other income (expense), net, of 329 Waihonua condominium units on Oahu, 22 units at Kukui'ula on Kauai, 12 units at Ka Milo$3.2 million, primarily related to a gain on the Islandsale of Hawai`i, and the one remaining unit at Kai Malu on Maui. The margin on these sales was partially offset bya real estate development joint venture expenses. Operating profit includes the reduction of the Company's solar energy investments of $2.6 million in 2015.venture.


46




Discontinued Operations
2017vs. 2016 vs. 2015
The revenue, operating income (loss), and after-tax effects of discontinued operations for 2017, 2016, and 2015 were as follows (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
Sugar operations revenue$22.9
 $98.4
 $97.7
Cost of sugar operations22.5
 87.5
 124.6
Operating income (loss) from sugar operations0.4
 10.9
 (26.9)
Sugar operations cessation costs(2.7) (77.6) (22.6)
Gain on asset dispositions6.0
 
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes3.7
 (66.7) (49.5)
Income tax (expense) benefit(1.3) 25.6
 19.8
Income (loss) from discontinued operations$2.4
 $(41.1) $(29.7)
2017: Income from discontinued operations of $2.4 million for 2017 reflected gains realized on asset dispositions during the year, as well as the results of operations related to the final sugar voyage that was completed in January 2017 and other exit related costs related to the cessation of the sugar operations. See Note 18, "Cessation of Sugar Operations" for further discussion regarding the cessation and the related costs associated with such exit and disposal activities.
2016:Loss from discontinued operations increased by $11.4 million from the prior year primarily due to an increase in sugar cessation charges of $77.6 million recognized during 2016 related to the cessation of the HC&S sugar operation, offset by improved results of operations related to the final harvest. The cessation charges included asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation, employee severance benefits and related costs, and property removal, restoration and other exit-related costs. See Note 18, "Cessation of Sugar Operations" for further discussion regarding the cessation and the related costs associated with such exit and disposal activities. The improved results of sugar operations were primarily due to lower overall production costs and higher sugar margins.
2015:Loss from discontinued operations during 2015 reflected the results of the Company's HC&S sugar operations. During 2015, the HC&S sugar operations incurred an operating loss of $26.9 million primarily due to low raw sugar margin as a result of low production and low power margin due to low pricing and volume. The cessation charges of $22.6 million recognized during 2015 consist of employee severance benefits and related costs, as well as asset write-offs for certain fixed assets. There were no commercial property sales in 2015 that were classified as discontinued operations pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.

47




Materials & Construction
Selected financial data for Materials & Construction for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 vs. 2016were as follows:
(dollars in millions)2017 2016 Change
       2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 2017 $ % $ %
Materials & Construction operating revenue$204.1
 $190.9
 6.9% $160.5
 $214.6
 $204.1
 $(54.1) (25.2)% $10.5
 5.1 %
Operating profit$22.0
 $23.3
 (5.6)%
Operating profit margin10.8% 12.2% 
Materials & Construction operating profit (loss) $(69.2) $(73.2) $22.0
 $4.0
 5.5 % $(95.2) NM
Depreciation and amortization$12.2
 $11.7
 4.3% $11.4
 $12.1
 $12.2
 $0.7
 5.8 % $0.1
 0.8 %
Aggregate tons delivered (tons in thousands)691.6
 696.1
 (0.6)% 786.9
 718.2
 691.6
 68.7
 9.6 % 26.6
 3.8 %
Asphalt tons delivered (tons in thousands)553.8
 444.9
 24.5% 293.8
 498.2
 553.8
 (204.4) (41.0)% (55.6) (10.0)%
Backlog1,2 at period end
$202.1
 $242.9
 (16.8)%
Backlog at period end1
 $79.5
 $128.7
 $202.1
 $(49.2) (38.2)% $(73.4) (36.3)%
1 Backlog represents the total of (1) the amount of revenue that Grace Pacific and Maui Paving, LLC, a 50-percent-owned unconsolidated affiliate, expect to realize on contracts awarded and (2) government contracts in which Grace Pacific has been confirmed to be the lowest bidder and formal communication of the award is perfunctory ($17.2 million as of December 31, 2017).awarded. Backlog primarily consists of asphalt paving and, to a lesser extent, Grace Pacific’s consolidated revenue from its Prestressprestress and construction-and traffic control-related products. Backlog includes estimated revenue from the remaining portion of contracts not yet completed, as well as revenue from approved change orders. The length of time that projects remain in backlog can span from a few days for a small volume of work to 36 months for large paving contracts and contracts performed in phases. Maui Paving's backlog at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $10.6 million and $15.0 million, respectively.
2 As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, the backlog included contractual revenue with related parties of $1.0these amounts include $14.3 million, $10.7 million and $1.3$17.2 million, respectively, of opportunity backlog consisting of government contracts in which Grace Pacific has been confirmed to be the lowest bidder and formal communication of the award is deemed perfunctory at the time of this disclosure. Circumstances outside the Company's control such as procurement or technical protests may arise that prevent the finalization of such contracts. Maui Paving's backlog as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $4.4 million, $4.1 million and $10.6 million, respectively.
Materials & Construction revenue was $204.1$160.5 million in 2017,for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $190.9$214.6 million in 2016. Revenue increased 6.9 percent primarilyfor the year ended December 31, 2018. Operating loss was $69.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $73.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. During the third quarter of 2019, the Company recorded an impairment to goodwill of $49.7 million due to higher overall net materialthe continued decline in sales and construction volumes. Backlog atmargins resulting from a deterioration in market conditions related to government agency bid opportunities. During 2018, the endCompany recorded impairments of December 31, 2017 was $202.1$77.8 million comparedrelated to $242.9 million as of December 31, 2016. Backlog reasonably expectedlong-lived assets for the quarry & paving operations and goodwill due primarily to be filled within the next fiscal year is $127.1 million.
Operating profit was $22.0 million for 2017, compared to $23.3 million for 2016, primarily due to lower paving margins as a result ofpersisting, competitive market pressures, as well as lower earnings from a materials joint venture.pressures. Earnings from joint venture investments are not included in segment revenue but are included in operating profit.loss.
2016 vs. 2015
(dollars in millions)2016 2015 Change
Materials & Construction operating revenue$190.9
 $219.0
 (12.8)%
Operating profit$23.3
 $30.9
 (24.6)%
Operating profit margin12.2% 14.1% 
Depreciation and amortization$11.7
 $11.6
 0.9%
Aggregate tons delivered (tons in thousands)696.1
 840.2
 (17.2)%
Asphalt tons delivered (tons in thousands)444.9
 466.7
 (4.7)%
Backlog at period end$242.9
 $226.5
 7.2%

Materials & Construction revenue was $190.9 million in 2016, compared to $219.0 million in 2015. Revenue declined 12.8 percent primarily due to aThe reduction in the price of asphalt sold due to the decline in oil prices and lower material and construction volumes and unit prices. During 2016, Materials & Construction experienced 232.5 crew days that were rained out, as compared to 175.5 days during 2015, which negatively impacted paving volume. Unit prices for paving decreased due to competitive pressures. Backlog at the end ofbacklog from December 31, 2016 was $242.9 million, compared2018 to $226.5 million as of December 31, 2015.
Operating profit was $23.3 million for 2016, compared2019 is due primarily to $30.9 million for 2015. Thean overall decrease was primarily related to decreasedin bidding opportunities presented by government agencies together with the completion of contract work during 2019. Additionally, backlog reflects a change in the manner in which local government agencies contract paving quarrying, and material sales, as well as lower earnings fromservices (reducing the amount of paving work that meets the definition of backlog). Certain agencies now award "maintenance contracts" under which a materials joint venture, partially offset by higher asphalt sales margins, due to lower material cost. Operating profit for 2016 was also impacted bycontractor can secure all paving work within a $2.6 million accrual for environmental costs related to the management of a former quarry site and a net loss of $1.0 million related to the sales of vacant land parcels by an unconsolidated affiliate. Earnings from joint venture investmentscertain geographic area, but jobs are not includedidentified in segment revenue but are includedadvance (and, therefore, will not meet the requirement for inclusion in operating profit.backlog).

48



LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview: A&B'sThe Company's primary liquidity needs have historically been to support working capital requirements and fund capital expenditures, commercial real estate acquisitions and real estate developments. A&B’s&B's principal sources of liquidity have been cash flows provided by operating activities, available cash and cash equivalent balances, and borrowing capacity under its various credit facilities.
A&B’sThe Company's operating income (loss) is generated by its subsidiaries. There are no material restrictions on the ability of A&B’sthe Company's wholly owned subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to A&B. A&Bthe Company. The Company regularly evaluates investment opportunities, including development projects, commercial real estate acquisitions, joint venture investments, share repurchases, business acquisitions and other strategic transactions to increase shareholder value. A&BThe Company cannot predict whether or when it may make investments or what impact any such transactions could have on A&B’sthe Company's results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. A&B’sThe Company’s cash flows from operations, borrowing availability and overall liquidity are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those described in the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 13.Factors."
Cash Flows: CashNet cash flows used inprovided by operations was $157.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20172019, primarily attributable to cash generated from the Company's CRE segment and Land Operations segment through leasing activities and real estate development sales, respectively, as well as tax-related cash receipts of $24.6 million (primarily related to Federal Income Tax receivables). Cash flows provided by operations was $1.3$309.9 million while cash flows from operations for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162018, primarily attributable to the bulk sale of 41,000 acres of agricultural lands and 2015 were $111.2 million,certain ownership interests, leasing activities and $129.1 million, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities includes expenditures related to real estate developments held for sale. The decrease indevelopment sales.


Net cash flows from operating activities is primarily attributed to cash outlays for working capital purposes, including a discretionary pension contribution and employee severance payments related to the cessation of HC&S sugar operations. These outflows are offset by non-cash impairment charges of $22.4 million for certain commercial real estate assets included in the 2017 operations.
Cash used in investing activities was $3.9$240.4 million and $33.2$104.7 million for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016, respectively, while cash provided by investing activities was $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the cash used in investing activities were primarily comprised of $255.1 million in capital expenditures, including $218.4 million related to the Company's acquisitions of five commercial real estate assets. Cash used in investing activities also included $3.3 million related to payments for purchases of investments in affiliates and other investments. Cash inflows from investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2019 included $13.6 million related to distributions from joint ventures and other returns of investments and $4.4 million of proceeds related to the disposal of property, investments and other assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the net cash used in investing activities included cash outlays of $296.1 million related to capital expenditures, including cash outlays of $288.7 million for the Company's acquisitions of Laulani Village Shopping Center, Hokulei Village Shopping Center, Pu‘unene Shopping Center, five commercial units at The Collection high-rise residential condominium project, and two Class A industrial warehouse buildings on Oahu. Cash outlays for investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018 also included contributions of $22.6 million related to investments in unconsolidated affiliates, which were $42.5affiliates. Cash inflows from investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018 included proceeds of $171.7 million and $41.9 million, respectively. Proceeds receivedresulting from the disposal of properties and other assets were $47.2 million, primarily related to the sales of Midstate 99 Distribution Center for $33.4 million in Novembernine improved properties and The Maui Clinic Building for $3.4 million in January.a ground lease. Other investing cash flow activity during 2017the year ended December 31, 2018 included $33.3$42.3 million of proceeds from joint ventures and other investments, primarily related to repayment of a notes receivable on a third-party development-for-sale project in the fourth quarter.investments.
Net cash flows used in investing activities for capital expenditures were as follows:
(in millions)2017 2016 Change
(in millions, unaudited) 2019 2018 Change
Commercial real estate property acquisitions/improvements$26.7
 $95.0
 (71.9)% $246.9
 $274.0
 (9.9)%
Tenant improvements6.1
 3.8
 60.5% 3.6
 8.7
 (58.6)%
Quarrying and paving6.3
 9.3
 (32.3)% 1.9
 11.0
 (82.7)%
Agribusiness and other3.4
 8.0
 (57.5)% 2.7
 2.4
 12.5%
Total capital expenditures1
$42.5
 $116.1
 (63.4)%
Total capital expenditures¹ $255.1
 $296.1
 (13.8)%
1 Excludes capital expenditures for real estate developments to be held and sold as real estate development inventory, which are classified in the consolidated statement of cash flows as operating activities and are excluded from the tabletables above.
In 2018, A&B2020, the Company expects that its requiredcapital expenditures will be approximately $45-$58 million. Of this amount, capital expenditures for growth, maintenance and maintenanceacquisition capital will be approximately $60-$33-$6541 million for the Commercial Real Estate portfolio and $8-segment. An additional $10-$1213 million has been projected for Materials & Construction. An additional $40-Construction and the remaining $2-$454 million has been projected for Land Operations.Operations/general corporate purposes. Should investment opportunities in excess of the amounts budgeted arise, A&Bthe Company believes it has adequate sources of liquidity to fund these investments.
Net cash flows provided byused in financing activities was $96.1$136.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20172019, as compared to net cash used in financing activities for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 20152018 of $84.7 million and $131.6 million, respectively.$73.5 million. The increasechange in cash flows used in financing activities in 20172019 as compared to 20162018 was due primarily to higher amounts borrowed undermaking net payments on debt (i.e., debt payments net of additional borrowings) as compared to net borrowings in the Company's revolving senior credit facility during 2017,prior period, partially offset by repayment amounts made onlower cash dividend payments in 2019 as compared to 2018 due to the Company's long term debt.
On November 16, 2017, in connection with its conversion to a REIT, the Company declared the Special Distribution of $783 million (approximately $15.92 per share), which represented the Company's previously undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits accumulated prior to January 1, 2017, the Company's REIT taxable income for the 2017 taxable year, and a substantial portion of the Company's estimated REIT taxable income for the 2018 taxable year. The Company completed the

49



cash dividend payment of the Special Distribution on January 23, 2018 through an aggregate of $156.6 million in cash and the issuance of 22,587,299 shares ofJanuary 2018 related to the Company's common stock.
On February 23, 2018, the Company acquiredconversion to a portfolio of commercial properties in Hawai`i (the "Portfolio") for a total consideration of $254.1 million, including assumed debt of $62.0 million. The Portfolio consists of three grocery-anchored shopping centers: (1) Laulani Village Shopping Center located in Ewa Beach, Oahu, (2) Hokulei Village Shopping Center located in Lihue, Kauai, and (3) Pu`unene Shopping Center located in Kahului, Maui.

The acquisition of the Portfolio was funded through proceeds from the sale of U.S. Mainland commercial properties via tax-deferred §1031 exchanges, the assumption of a $62.0 million promissory note (“Promissory Note”), and borrowings under the Company’s revolving senior credit facility at the time of closing.

The Promissory Note bears interest at 3.93 percent and requires monthly interest payments of approximately $0.2 million until May 2020 and principal and interest payments of approximately $0.3 million thereafter. The Promissory Note matures on May 1, 2024 and is secured by the Laulani Village Shopping Center.

On February 26, 2018,the Company entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and a syndicate of other financial institutions that provides for a $50 million term loan facility (“Wells Fargo Term Facility”). The Company also drew $50 million under the Wells Fargo Term Facility on February 26, 2018 and used such term loan proceeds to repay amounts that were borrowed under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of the Portfolio. Borrowings under the Wells Fargo Term Facility bear interest at a stated rate, as defined, plus a margin that is determined based on a pricing grid using the ratio of debt to total assets ratio, as defined.

REIT.
The Company believes that funds generated from results of operations, available cash and cash equivalents, and available borrowings under credit facilities will be sufficient to finance the Company’sCompany's business requirements for the next fiscal year, including working capital, capital expenditures, potential acquisitions, notes payable and other debt due in the next twelve months and stock repurchases. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that it will be able to maintain its ability to borrow under its available credit facilities.
Other Sources of Liquidity: Additional sources of liquidity for the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, trade and income tax receivables, contracts retention and other miscellaneous liquid assets (e.g., income tax receivables, inventories ready to be sold) totaling $174.1$73.1 million at December 31, 2017, an increase2019, a decrease of $73.7$38.4 million from December 31, 2016. This net increase is primarily due to aggregate borrowings of $100 million under the Company's new term facilities during the fourth quarter of 2017.2018.
The Company also has revolving credit and term facilities that provide additional sources of liquidity for working capital requirements or investment opportunities on a short-term as well as longer-term basis. On September 15, 2017,As of December 31, 2019, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ("A&B Revolver") with Bankhad $98.7 million of America N.A., as administrative agent, First Hawaiian Bank, and other lenders party thereto, which amended and restated its existing $350 million committed revolving credit facility ("Revolving Credit Facility"). The A&B Revolver increased the total revolving commitments to $450 million, extended the term of the Revolving Credit Facility to September 15, 2022, amended certain covenants, and reduced the interest rates and fees charged under the Revolving Credit Facility. Additionally, all other terms of the Revolving Credit Facility remain substantially unchanged. At December 31, 2017, $66.0 million wasborrowings outstanding, $11.8$1.7 million in letters of credit had been issued against the facility, and $372.2$349.6 million remained available.
In December 2015, the Company entered into a three-year unsecured note purchase and private shelf agreement (the "Prudential Agreement") with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, "Prudential") that enabled the Company to issue notes in an aggregate amount up to $450 million, less the sum of all principal amounts then outstanding on any notes issued by the Company or any of its subsidiaries to Prudential and the amounts of any notes that are committed under the Prudential Agreement. The Prudential Agreement, as amended, expires in December 2018 and contains certain restrictive covenants that are substantially the same as the covenants contained in the A&B Revolver, as amended. Borrowings under the shelf facility bear interest at rates that are determined at the time of the borrowing.
A&B’s ability to access its credit facilities is subject to its compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit facilities, including financial covenants. The financial covenants under current agreements require A&B to maintain certain financial metrics, such as the maintenance of minimum shareholders’ equity levels, minimum EBITDA to fixed charges ratio, maximum debt to total assets ratio, minimum unencumbered income-producing asset value to unencumbered debt ratio and limitations on priority debt. As a result of the Special Distribution, that was declared on November 16, 2017 and settled on January 23, 2018, the Company received waivers related to the impact of the Special Distribution on the minimumunused.

50




shareholder’s equity computation for its A&B Revolver and unsecured term loan agreements. The Company's debt is more fully described in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Balance Sheet: The Company has a working capital deficit of $652.0 million as of December 31, 2017, which is a decrease of $625.2 million, from a $26.8 million deficit as of December 31, 2016. The change in the working capital is due to the increase in dividend payable related to the special distribution of $783.0 million comprised of $156.6 million in cash and $626.4 million in shares, both paid in January 2018. The increase in liabilities was offset by an increase in cash on hand due to fourth quarter term borrowings, an increase in real estate held for sale due to the Company's strategic decision to put certain of its Mainland commercial properties up for sale, recognition of previously deferred revenue related to the last sugar harvest shipment (which was shipped as of December 31, 2016 but not recognized until receipt by the customer in January 2017), payment of substantially all HC&S cessation related liabilities during 2017, and an increase in the Company's income tax receivable from 2016 to 2017.
Tax-Deferred Real Estate Exchanges:
Sales: During 2017, sales and condemnationthe year ended December 31, 2019, the Company generated approximately $6.7 million of cash proceeds that qualified for potential tax-deferral treatment under Internal Revenue§1031 of the Code Sections 1031 and 1033 totaled approximately $34.1 million fromin connection with the sale of office properties in California and Maui and a land parcelparcels on Maui.
Purchases: During 2016, sales and condemnation proceeds that qualified for potential tax-deferral treatment under Internal Revenue Code §1031 and §1033 totaled approximately $77.4 million from the sales of two California properties and one Utah office property in June 2016.
Purchases: During 2017,year ended December 31, 2019, the Company utilized $10.1$219.0 million of funds from tax-deferred sales to acquire Honokohau Industrial Park under a reverse 1031 exchange transaction. During 2016, the Company acquired both the leasehold and leased fee interests of Manoa Marketplace, a retail center on Oahu for $82.4 million. The proceeds from the sales of the three Mainland properties that were completed during the second quarter have been applied to the Manoa Marketplace acquisition under a reverse §1031 transaction that qualifies for tax-deferral treatment under Internal Revenue Code §1031. Additionally, $8.2 million of §1033 condemnation proceeds received during the fourth quarter were applied to the Manoa Marketplace acquisition. Also during 2016, the Company acquired the leased fee interest in 2929 East Manoa Road for $2.8 million using $1.2 million of proceeds from the Mainland property sales under a §1031 transaction and expects to fund the remainder from sales proceeds in 2017.or condemnations.
Proceeds from §1031 tax-deferred sales under §1031 of the Code are held in escrow pending future use to purchase new real estate assets. The proceeds from condemnations under §1033 condemnationsof the Code are held by the Company until the funds are redeployed. As ofDuring the year ended December 31, 2017, there were approximately $34.12019, $11.0 million of funds from tax-deferred sales or condemnations expired without being reinvested. As of December 31, 2019, there were no cash proceeds from tax-deferred sales and approximately $14.5 million from tax-deferred condemnations that had not yet been reinvested.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Contractual Obligations:At As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company had the following estimated contractual obligations (in millions):
    Payment due by period
Contractual Obligations Total 2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 Thereafter
Long-term debt obligations(a)$631.8
 $41.8
 $80.9
 $166.8
 $342.3
Estimated interest on debt(b)150.3
 24.2
 42.2
 34.3
 49.6
Purchase obligations(c)40.6
 40.6
 
 
 
Pension benefits 126.2
 12.6
 25.3
 25.5
 62.8
Post-retirement obligations(d)7.8
 0.9
 1.8
 1.6
 3.5
Non-qualified benefit obligations(e)4.2
 0.7
 1.4
 
 2.1
Operating lease obligations(f)42.4
 5.5
 10.2
 8.8
 17.9
Total $1,003.3
 $126.3
 $161.8
 $237.0
 $478.2
(a)Long-term debt obligations (including current portion, but excluding debt premium or discount) include principal repayments of short-term and long-term debt for the respective period(s) described (see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for principal repayments for each of the next five years). Long-term debt includes amounts borrowed under revolving credit facilities, which have been reflected as payments due in 2022. This amount does not include the debt issuance cost.

(in millions, unaudited)   Payment due by period
Contractual Obligations Total 2020 2021-2022 2023-2024 Thereafter
Debt obligations(1)$705.2
 $30.9
 $171.8
 $241.3
 $261.2
Estimated interest on debt(2)150.3
 30.3
 55.8
 33.5
 30.7
Purchase obligations(3)12.8
 12.8
 
 
 
Pension benefits 124.9
 13.1
 26.0
 25.4
 60.4
Post-retirement obligations(4)6.1
 0.8
 1.4
 1.2
 2.7
Non-qualified benefit obligations(5)3.0
 
 1.2
 
 1.8
Operating lease obligations(6)28.4
 4.6
 9.0
 5.9
 8.9
Total $1,030.7
 $92.5
 $265.2
 $307.3
 $365.7
51


(1) Debt obligations (excluding debt premium or discount) include principal repayments of debt for the respective period(s) described (see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for debt maturities for each of the next five years). Debt includes amounts borrowed under revolving credit facilities, which have been reflected as payments due in 2022. This amount does not include the debt issuance cost.

(2) Estimated cash paid for interest on debt is determined based on (1) the stated interest rate for fixed debt and (2) the rate in effect as of December 31, 2019 for variable rate debt. Because the Company’s variable rate debt may be rolled over, actual interest may be greater or less than the amounts indicated. Estimated interest on debt also includes swap payments on the Company's interest rate swaps.
(b)
Estimated cash paid for interest on debt is determined based on (1) the stated interest rate for fixed debt and (2) the rate in effect on December 31, 2017 for variable rate debt. Because the Company’s variable rate debt may be rolled over, actual interest may be greater or less than the amounts indicated. Estimated interest on debt also includes swap payments on the Company's interest rate swaps.
(c)Purchase obligations include only non-cancelable contractual obligations for the purchases of goods and services. Arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, a pricing structure and approximate timing of the transaction. Any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheet as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above.
(d)Post-retirement obligations include expected payments to medical service providers in connection with providing benefits to the Company’s employees and retirees. The $3.5 million noted in the column labeled “Thereafter” comprises estimated benefit payments for 2023 through 2027. Post-retirement obligations are described further in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The obligation for pensions reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet is excluded from the table above because the Company is unable to reliably estimate the timing and amount of contributions.
(e)Non-qualified benefit obligations include estimated payments to executives and directors under the Company’s three non-qualified plans. The $2.1 million noted in the column labeled “Thereafter” comprises estimated benefit payments for 2023 through 2027. Additional information about the Company’s non-qualified plans is included in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(f)Operating lease obligations primarily include land, office space and equipment under non-cancelable, long-term lease arrangements that do not transfer the rights and risks of ownership to A&B. These amounts are further described in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other (3) Purchase obligations include only non-cancelable contractual obligations for the purchases of goods and services. Arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, a pricing structure and approximate timing of the transaction. Any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheet as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above.
(4) Post-retirement obligations include expected payments to medical service providers in connection with providing benefits to the Company’s employees and retirees. The $2.7 million noted in the column labeled “Thereafter” comprises estimated benefit payments for 2025 through 2029. Post-retirement obligations are described further in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
(5) Non-qualified benefit obligations include estimated payments to executives and directors under the Company’s non-qualified plans. The $1.8 million noted in the column labeled “Thereafter” comprises estimated benefit payments for 2025 through 2029. Additional information about the Company’s non-qualified plans is included in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
(6) Operating lease obligations primarily include land, office space and equipment under non-cancelable, long-term lease arrangements that do not transfer the rights and risks of ownership to the Company. Such obligations are recognized as lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets based on the present value of such payments over the lease term and are further described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
Commitments, Contingencies and ContingenciesOff-balance Sheet Arrangements: A description of other commitments, contingencies, and off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2019, and herein incorporated by reference, is describedincluded in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements of Item 8 in this Form 10-K, and incorporated herein by reference.10-K.

52





ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
A&BThe Company is exposed to changes in interest rates, primarily as a result of its borrowing and investing activities used to maintain liquidity and to fund business operations. In order to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates, A&Bthe Company utilizes a balanced mix of debt maturities, along with both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. The nature and amount of A&B’sthe Company’s long-term and short-term debt can be expected to fluctuate as a result of future business requirements, market conditions, and other factors.
A&B’sThe Company’s fixed rate debt, excluding debt premium or discount and debt issuance costs, consists of $555.9$556.5 million in principal term notes. A&B’sThe Company’s variable rate debt consists of $66.5$98.7 million under its revolving credit facilities and $9.4$50.0 millionunder term loans.a bank syndicated loan. Other than in default, A&Bthe Company does not have an obligation, nor the option in some cases, to prepay its fixed-rate debt prior to maturity and, as a result, interest rate fluctuations and the resulting changes in fair value would not have an impact on A&B’sthe Company’s financial condition or results of operations unless A&Bthe Company was required to refinance such debt. For A&B’sthe Company’s variable rate debt, a one percent increase in interest rates would have approximately a $0.8$1.5 million impact on A&B'sthe Company's results of operations for 2017,2019, assuming the December 31, 20172019 balance of the variable rate debt was outstanding throughout 2017.2019.
The following table summarizes A&B’sthe Company’s debt obligations at December 31, 2017,2019, presenting principal cash flows and related interest rates by the expected fiscal year of repayment.
Expected Fiscal Year of Repayment as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in millions)
               Fair Value at
              Fair Value at Expected Fiscal Year of Repayment at December 31, 2019 December 31,
              December 31,
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total 2017
(dollars in millions) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total 2019
Liabilities                               
Fixed rate$41.3
 $41.2
 $39.7
 $51.0
 $40.4
 $342.3
 $555.9
 $491.3
 $30.9
 $43.3
 $29.9
 $34.3
 $156.8
 $261.3
 $556.5
 $578.6
Average interest rate4.60% 4.54% 4.47% 4.46% 4.42% 4.26% 4.36%   4.40% 4.34% 4.24% 4.19% 3.41% 3.77% 4.05%  
Variable rate$0.5
 $
 $
 $9.4
 $66.0
 $
 $75.9
 $151.0
 $
 $
 $98.7
 $50.0
 $
 $
 $148.7
 $148.7
Average interest rate*3.27% 3.24% 3.21% 3.16% 3.00% 3.02% 3.09%  
Average interest rate1
 4.31% 4.31% 4.31% 3.51% % % 4.23%  
*1Estimated interest rates on variable rate debt are determined based on the rate in effect on December 31, 2017.2019. Actual interest rates may be greater or less than the amounts indicated when variable rate debt is rolled over.
From time to time, the Company may invest its excess cash in short-term money market funds that purchase government securities or corporate debt securities. At December 31, 2017,2019, the amount invested in money market funds was immaterial. These money market funds maintain a weighted average maturity of less than 9060 days, and accordingly, a one percent change in interest rates is not expected to have a material impact on the fair value of these investments or on interest income.
A&BThe Company has no material exposure to foreign currency risks.


53





ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 Page  Page
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Balance SheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of OperationConsolidated Statements of Operation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsConsolidated Statements of Cash FlowsConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of EquityConsolidated Statements of EquityConsolidated Statements of Equity
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNotes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.Background and Basis of Presentation1.Background and Basis of Presentation
2.Significant Accounting Policies2.Significant Accounting Policies
3.Related Party Transactions3.Related Party Transactions
4.Discontinued Operations4.Discontinued Operations
5.Investments in Affiliates5.Investments in Affiliates
6.Uncompleted Contracts6.Revenue and Contract Balances
7.Property7.Real Estate Property, Net
8.Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt8.Notes Payable and Other Debt
9.Leases – The Company as Lessee9.Leases – The Company as Lessee
10Leases – The Company as Lessor10Leases – The Company as Lessor
11.Employee Benefit Plans11.Employee Benefit Plans
12.Income Taxes12.Income Taxes
13.Share-Based Awards13.Share-Based Payment Awards
14.Commitments and Contingencies14.Commitments and Contingencies
15.Derivative Instruments15.Derivative Instruments
16.Earnings Per Share ("EPS")16.Earnings Per Share ("EPS")
17.Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest17.Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
18.Cessation of Sugar Operations18.Cessation of Sugar Operations
19.Segment Results19.Segment Results
20.Subsequent Events20.Real Estate Acquisitions
21.Agricultural Land Sale
22.Goodwill
23.Subsequent Events
24.Unaudited Summarized Quarterly Information



54





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 1, 2018,February 27, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sCompany's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Goodwill - Materials & Construction Segment (Fair Value of the Reporting Units) - Refer to Note 22 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually or between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. If the results of the Company's test indicate that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
The goodwill impairment test estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using various methodologies, including an income approach that is based on a discounted cash flow analysis and a market approach that involves the application of market-derived multiples. The discounted cash flow approach relies on a number of assumptions, including future macroeconomic conditions and market factors, primarily related to the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows, and the selection of an


appropriate discount rate. Under the market multiple methodology, the estimate of fair value is based on market multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) or revenues. When using market multiples of EBITDA or revenues, the Company must make judgments about the comparability of those multiples in closed and proposed transactions and comparability of multiples for similar companies.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, the carrying amounts of the Materials & Construction reporting units exceeded their estimated fair values and goodwill was determined to be impaired. The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $49.7 million.

Significant judgments were made by management to estimate the fair value of the Materials & Construction reporting units including assumptions related to the forecasting of future cash flows, selection of discount rates, and selection of market multiples of EBITDA or revenues. Performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of these assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgement and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to management’s forecasting of future cash flows, selection of discount rates, and selection of market multiples of EBITDA or revenues for the Materials & Construction reporting units included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s determination of fair value of the Materials & Construction reporting units, including controls related to management’s forecasts and selection of discount rates and market multiples.
We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast future cash flows by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts.
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts of future cash flows by comparing the forecasts to:
Forecasted information included in Company press releases as well as external, independent analyst, economic and industry reports for the Company and certain of its peer companies.
Historical results.
Actual performance subsequent to year end.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the discount rates, including testing the underlying source information and the mathematical accuracy of the calculations, and developing a range of independent estimates for discount rates and comparing those to the discount rates selected by management.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the multiples of EBITDA and revenue, including testing the underlying source information and mathematical accuracy of the calculations, and comparing the multiples selected by management to those of similar companies.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Honolulu, HawaiiHawai‘i
March 1, 2018February 27, 2020

We have served as the Company’sCompany's auditor since 1950.


55


ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions)
  December 31,
  2019 2018
ASSETS    
Real estate investments    
Real estate property $1,540.2
 $1,293.7
Accumulated depreciation (127.5) (107.2)
Real estate property, net 1,412.7
 1,186.5
Real estate developments 79.1
 155.2
Investments in real estate joint ventures and partnerships 133.4
 141.0
Real estate intangible assets, net 74.9
 59.8
Real estate investments, net 1,700.1
 1,542.5
Cash and cash equivalents 15.2
 11.4
Restricted cash 0.2
 223.5
Accounts receivable, net 43.4
 49.6
Contracts retention 8.6
 11.6
Inventories 20.7
 26.5
Other property, net 124.4
 135.5
Operating lease right-of-use assets 21.8
 
Goodwill 15.4
 65.1
Other receivables 27.4
 56.8
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts 10.0
 9.2
Prepaid expenses and other assets 97.1
 93.5
Total assets $2,084.3
 $2,225.2
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Liabilities:    
Notes payable and other debt $704.6
 $778.1
Accounts payable 17.8
 34.2
Operating lease liabilities 21.6
 
Accrued pension and post-retirement benefits 26.8
 29.4
Indemnity holdbacks 7.5
 16.3
Deferred revenue 67.6
 63.2
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts 7.9
 5.9
Accrued and other liabilities 95.5
 81.9
Total liabilities 949.3
 1,009.0
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) 

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest (Note 17) 6.3
 7.9
Equity:    
Common stock - no par value; authorized, 150 million shares; outstanding, 72.3 million and 72.0 million shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively 1,800.1
 1,793.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (48.8) (51.9)
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings (626.2) (538.9)
Total A&B shareholders' equity 1,125.1
 1,202.6
Noncontrolling interest 3.6
 5.7
Total equity 1,128.7
 1,208.3
Total liabilities and equity $2,084.3
 $2,225.2
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.




ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Operating Revenue:            
Commercial Real Estate $136.9
 $134.7
 $133.6
 $160.6

$140.3
 $136.9
Land Operations 84.5
 61.9
 120.2
 114.1

289.5
 84.5
Materials & Construction 204.1
 190.9
 219.0
 160.5

214.6
 204.1
Total operating revenue 425.5
 387.5
 472.8
 435.2

644.4
 425.5
Operating Costs and Expenses:        

  
Cost of Commercial Real Estate 75.5
 79.0
 80.4
 89.0

77.2
 75.5
Cost of Land Operations 60.4
 35.0
 71.1
 92.5

117.1
 60.4
Cost of Materials & Construction 166.1
 154.5
 175.7
 159.4

188.1
 166.1
Selling, general and administrative 66.4
 52.0
 51.6
 58.9

61.2
 66.4
REIT evaluation/conversion costs 15.2
 9.5
 
 


 15.2
Impairment of real estate assets 22.4
 11.7
 
Impairment of assets 49.7
 79.4
 22.4
Total operating costs and expenses 406.0
 341.7
 378.8
 449.5
 523.0
 406.0
Operating Income 19.5
 45.8
 94.0
Income related to joint ventures 7.2
 19.2
 36.8
Reductions in solar investments, net (Note 5, 12, 14) (2.6) (9.8) (2.6)
Interest and other income (expense), net 2.1
 (1.7) (2.5)
Gain (loss) on the sale of commercial real estate properties 

51.4
 9.3
Operating Income (Loss) (14.3) 172.8
 28.8
Other Income and (Expenses):      
Income (loss) related to joint ventures 5.3
 (4.1) 7.2
Impairment of equity method investment 
 (188.6) 
Interest and other income (expense), net (Note 2) 3.2

2.3
 (0.5)
Interest expense (25.6) (26.3) (26.8) (33.1)
(35.3) (25.6)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Net Gain (Loss) on Sale of Improved Properties 0.6
 27.2
 98.9
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes (38.9)
(52.9) 9.9
Income tax benefit (expense) 218.2
 0.5
 (37.0) 2.0

(16.3) 218.2
Income from Continuing Operations Before Net Gain (Loss) on Sale of Improved Properties 218.8

27.7

61.9
Net gain (loss) on the sale of improved properties, net of income taxes 9.3
 5.0
 (1.1)
Income from Continuing Operations 228.1
 32.7
 60.8
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations (36.9)
(69.2) 228.1
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (Note 4) 2.4
 (41.1) (29.7) (1.5)
(0.6) 2.4
Net Income (Loss) 230.5
 (8.4) 31.1
 (38.4)
(69.8) 230.5
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest (2.2) (1.8) (1.5)
Loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.0

(2.2) (2.2)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $228.3
 $(10.2) $29.6
 $(36.4)
$(72.0) $228.3
            
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Available to A&B Shareholders:      
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:       


  
Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders $4.63
 $0.66
 $1.15
 $(0.49)
$(1.01) $4.63
Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders 0.05
 (0.84) (0.61) (0.02)
(0.01) 0.05
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $4.68
 $(0.18) $0.54
 $(0.51)
$(1.02) $4.68
      
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock: 
      
   
Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders $4.30
 $0.65
 $1.14
 $(0.49)
$(1.01) $4.30
Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders 0.04
 (0.83) (0.60) (0.02)
(0.01) 0.04
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $4.34
 $(0.18) $0.54
 $(0.51)
$(1.02) $4.34

 
          
  
   
Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding: 
     


  
Basic 49.2
 49.0
 48.9
 72.2

70.6
 49.2
Diluted 53.0
 49.4
 49.3
 72.2

70.6
 53.0

 

     




  
Amounts Available to A&B Shareholders (Note 16): 

    
Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders, net of income taxes $227.7
 $32.2
 $56.2
Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders, net of income taxes 2.4
 (41.1) (29.7)
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders $230.1
 $(8.9) $26.5
Amounts Available to A&B Common Shareholders (Note 16): 




  
Continuing operations available to A&B common shareholders $(35.1)
$(71.4) $227.7
Discontinued operations available to A&B common shareholders (1.5)
(0.6) 2.4
Net income (loss) available to A&B common shareholders $(36.6)
$(72.0) $230.1
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

56





ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In millions)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Net Income (Loss) $230.5
 $(8.4) $31.1
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:      
Unrealized interest rate hedging gain (loss) (0.4) 2.6
 
Reclassification adjustment for interest expense included in net income or loss 0.5
 0.4
 
Defined benefit pension plans:      
Actuarial loss (3.2) (4.6) (7.1)
Amortization of net loss included in net periodic pension cost 5.7
 7.5
 7.3
Amortization of prior service credit included in net periodic pension cost (1.1) (0.9) (1.3)
Curtailment 
 (1.5) 
Prior service cost 
 
 (0.4)
Income taxes related to other comprehensive income (0.6) (1.4) 0.6
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 0.9
 2.1
 (0.9)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) 231.4
 (6.3) 30.2
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest (2.2) (1.8) (1.5)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $229.2
 $(8.1) $28.7
  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Net Income (Loss) $(38.4) $(69.8) $230.5
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:      
Unrealized interest rate hedging gain (loss) (4.0) 1.0
 (0.4)
Impact of reclassification adjustment to interest expense included in Net Income (Loss) (0.1) 
 0.5
Defined benefit pension plans:      
Actuarial gain (loss) 5.3
 (4.9) (3.2)
Amortization of net loss included in net periodic benefit cost 4.0
 4.6
 4.3
Amortization of prior service credit included in net periodic benefit cost (0.7) (0.7) (0.8)
Curtailment (gain)/loss (1.4) (0.6) (0.3)
Settlement (gain)/loss 
 0.1
 1.4
Income taxes related to other comprehensive income (loss) 
 
 (0.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 3.1
 (0.5) 0.9
Comprehensive Income (Loss) (35.3) (70.3) 231.4
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.0
 (2.2) (2.2)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders $(33.3) $(72.5) $229.2
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

57


ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions)
 December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS   
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$68.9
 $2.2
Accounts receivable, net34.1
 32.1
Contracts retention13.2
 13.1
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts20.2
 16.4
Inventories31.9
 43.3
Real estate held for sale67.4
 1.0
Income tax receivable27.7
 10.6
Prepaid expenses and other assets11.4
 19.6
Total current assets274.8
 138.3
Investments in Affiliates401.7
 390.8
Real Estate Developments151.0
 179.5
Property – Net1,147.5
 1,231.6
Intangible Assets – Net46.9
 53.8
Deferred Tax Asset16.5
 
Goodwill102.3
 102.3
Restricted Cash34.3
 10.1
Other Assets56.2
 49.9
Total assets$2,231.2
 $2,156.3
    
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
Current Liabilities:   
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt$46.0
 $42.4
Accounts payable43.3
 35.2
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts5.7
 3.5
Accrued interest6.5
 6.3
Deferred revenue0.9
 17.6
Indemnity holdback related to Grace acquisition9.3
 9.3
HC&S cessation-related liabilities4.6
 19.1
Accrued dividends783.0
 
Accrued and other liabilities27.5
 31.7
Total current liabilities926.8
 165.1
Long-term Liabilities:   
Long-term debt585.2
 472.7
Deferred income taxes
 182.0
Accrued pension and post-retirement benefits19.9
 64.8
Other non-current liabilities40.2
 47.7
Total long-term liabilities645.3
 767.2
Total liabilities1,572.1
 932.3
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14)
 
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest (Note 17)8.0
 10.8
Equity:   
Common stock - no par value; authorized, 150 million shares; outstanding, 49.3 million and 49.0 million shares at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively1,161.7
 1,157.3
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(42.3) (43.2)
(Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings) Retained earnings(473.0) 95.2
Total A&B shareholders' equity646.4
 1,209.3
Noncontrolling interest4.7
 3.9
Total equity651.1
 1,213.2
Total liabilities and equity$2,231.2
 $2,156.3
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

58





ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:           
Net income (loss)$230.5
 $(8.4) $31.1
 $(38.4) $(69.8) $230.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operations:           
Depreciation and amortization41.4
 119.5
 55.7
 50.5
 42.8
 41.4
Deferred income taxes(199.0) (20.1) 16.9
 
 16.6
 (199.0)
Gains on asset transactions, net of asset write-downs(12.7) (11.6) (35.8)
Loss (gain) on asset transactions, net (2.6) (54.0) (35.1)
Impairment of assets and equity method investments 49.7
 268.0
 22.4
Share-based compensation expense4.4
 4.1
 4.7
 5.4
 4.7
 4.4
Investments in affiliates, net of distributions5.5
 1.4
 (3.7)
(Income) loss from affiliates, net of distributions of income (1.4) 12.9
 5.5
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:           
Trade, contracts retention, and other receivables(0.9) 4.3
 (3.1)
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts - net(1.5) 0.7
 (1.4)
Trade, contracts retention, and other contract receivables 8.5
 (4.2) (2.4)
Inventories11.4
 12.7
 25.9
 5.7
 5.5
 11.4
Prepaid expenses, income tax receivable and other assets(23.0) (0.1) (12.5) 28.5
 (13.2) (23.0)
Accrued pension and post-retirement benefits(47.4) 6.3
 3.6
 4.6
 3.6
 (47.4)
Accounts payable and contracts retention3.3
 (0.4) 0.1
Accounts payable (12.9) (9.0) 3.3
Accrued and other liabilities(40.1) 10.7
 (18.2) 3.2
 74.2
 (40.1)
Real estate inventory sales (real estate developments held for sale)47.6
 7.4
 73.0
Expenditures for real estate inventory (real estate developments held for sale)(20.8) (15.3) (7.2)
Net cash (used in) provided by operations(1.3) 111.2
 129.1
Real estate development for sale proceeds, net of margins recognized in net income (loss) 65.1
 58.4
 47.6
Expenditures for real estate development for sale (8.3) (26.6) (20.8)
Net cash provided by (used in) operations 157.6
 309.9
 (1.3)
           
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:           
Capital expenditures for acquisitions (218.4) (241.7) (10.1)
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment(42.5) (116.1) (44.7) (36.7) (54.4) (32.4)
Proceeds from disposal of property and other assets47.2
 88.8
 48.1
Proceeds from disposal of property, investments and other assets 4.4
 171.7
 47.2
Payments for purchases of investments in affiliates and other investments(41.9) (47.2) (29.4) (3.3) (22.6) (41.9)
Proceeds from investments in affiliates and other investments33.3
 41.3
 44.4
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(3.9) (33.2) 18.4
Distributions of capital from investments in affiliates and other investments 13.6
 42.3
 33.3
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (240.4) (104.7) (3.9)
           
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:           
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt292.5
 272.0
 132.0
Payments of long-term debt and deferred financing costs(181.0) (334.3) (248.1)
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable and other debt 125.9
 548.4
 292.5
Payments of notes payable and other debt and deferred financing costs (203.9) (467.8) (181.0)
Borrowings (payments) on line-of-credit agreement, net2.6

(9.9) (3.0) (0.3) 4.7
 2.6
Distribution to noncontrolling interests(0.5) (1.4) (1.1) (0.3) (0.7) (0.5)
Dividends paid(10.3) (12.3) (10.3)
Cash dividends paid (50.0) (156.6) (10.3)
Proceeds from issuance (repurchase) of capital stock and other, net(7.2) 1.2
 (1.1) (1.0) (1.5) (7.2)
Payment of deferred acquisition holdback (7.1) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities96.1
 (84.7) (131.6) (136.7) (73.5) 96.1
           
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash:     
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash90.9
 (6.7) 15.9
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash      
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (219.5) 131.7
 90.9
Balance, beginning of period12.3
 19.0
 3.1
 234.9
 103.2
 12.3
Balance, end of period$103.2
 $12.3
 $19.0
 $15.4
 $234.9
 $103.2

59




Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Other Cash Flow Information:           
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest$(24.9) $(26.2) $(27.3) $(32.5) $(34.4) $(24.9)
Income taxes paid$(4.0) $
 $(6.4)
Income tax (payments)/refunds, net $25.8
 $2.6
 $(4.0)
           
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:           
Contribution of land and development assets to joint ventures$
 $
 $9.6
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities $4.4
 $1.4
 $4.5
Fair value of loan assumed in connection with acquisition $
 $61.0
 $
Uncollected proceeds from disposal of equipment $
 $
 $1.9
Real estate exchanged for note receivable$2.5
 $
 $1.9
 $
 $
 $2.5
Declared distribution from investment in affiliate$
 $8.0
 $
Declared distribution to noncontrolling interest$
 $0.9
 $0.4
Asset retirement obligations$
 $5.4
 $6.0
Uncollected proceeds from disposal of equipment$1.9
 $
 $
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses$4.5
 $1.3
 $8.0
Right-of-use ("ROU") assets and corresponding lease liability recorded upon ASC 842 adoption $31.0
 $
 $
Finance lease liabilities arising from obtaining ROU assets $3.4
 $
 $
Issuance of shares for stock dividend $
 $626.4
 $
Dividends declared$783.0
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $783.0
      
      
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:      
Beginning of the period:      
Cash and cash equivalents $11.4
 $68.9
 $2.2
Restricted cash 223.5
 34.3
 10.1
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $234.9
 $103.2
 $12.3
      
End of the period:      
Cash and cash equivalents $15.2
 $11.4
 $68.9
Restricted cash 0.2
 223.5
 34.3
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $15.4
 $234.9
 $103.2
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

60





ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In millions)millions, except per share amounts)
Total Equity   Total Equity  
 



(Distributions 
     Common Stock Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive Income (Loss)
 (Distribution
in Excess
of Accumulated Earnings)
Earnings Surplus
 Non-Controlling
Interest
 Total Redeem-
able
Non-
Controlling
Interest
 
Accumulatedin Excess of 
   Redeem- 
 CommonOtherAccumulated 
   able Shares Stated Value 
 StockCompre-Earnings) Non-   Non-
 

StatedhensiveRetained Controlling   Controlling
 Shares
Value Loss Earnings Interest Total Interest
Balance, January 1, 2015 48.8
 $1,147.3
 $(44.4) $101.0
 $10.9
 $1,214.8
 $
Net income       29.6
 1.1
 30.7
 0.4
Other comprehensive income, net of tax     (0.9)     (0.9)  
Dividends on common stock ($0.21 per share)       (10.3)   (10.3)  
Reclassification of redeemable noncontrolling interest (Note 17)         (8.5) (8.5) 8.5
Distributions to noncontrolling interest           
 (0.4)
Adjustments to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest (Note 17)       (3.1)   (3.1) 3.1
Share-based compensation   4.7
       4.7
  
Shares issued or repurchased, net 0.1
 (0.9)       (0.9)  
Excess tax benefit from share-based awards   0.6
       0.6
  
Balance, December 31, 2015 48.9
 1,151.7
 (45.3) 117.2
 3.5
 1,227.1
 11.6
Balance, January 1, 2017 49.0
 $1,157.3
 $(43.2) $95.2
 $3.9
 $1,213.2
 $10.8
Net income (loss)       (10.2) 0.4
 (9.8) 1.4
 
 
 
 228.3
 1.0
 229.3
 1.2
Other comprehensive income, net of tax     2.1
     2.1
  
Dividends on common stock ($0.25 per share)       (12.3)   (12.3)  
Distributions to noncontrolling interest           
 (0.9)
Adjustments to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest (Note 17)       1.3
   1.3
 (1.3)
Share-based compensation   4.1
       4.1
  
Shares issued or repurchased, net 0.1
 1.5
   (0.8)   0.7
  
Balance, December 31, 2016 49.0
 1,157.3
 (43.2) 95.2
 3.9
 1,213.2
 10.8
Net income 

 

 

 228.3
 1.0
 229.3
 1.2
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 

 

 0.9
 

 
 0.9
 

Dividends on common stock ($16.13 per share) 

 

 

 (793.3) 
 (793.3) 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 
 
 0.9
 
 
 0.9
 
Dividend on common stock ($16.13 per share) 
 
 
 (793.3) 
 (793.3) 
Distributions to noncontrolling interest 

 

 

 

 (0.2) (0.2) (0.3) 
 
 
 
 (0.2) (0.2) (0.3)
Adjustments to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest (Note 17) 

 

 

 3.7
 

 3.7
 (3.7) 
 
 
 3.7
 
 3.7
 (3.7)
Share-based compensation 

 4.4
 

 

 

 4.4
 

 
 4.4
 
 
 
 4.4
 
Shares issued or repurchased, net 0.3
 
 

 (6.9) 
 (6.9) 

 0.3
 
 
 (6.9) 
 (6.9) 
Balance, December 31, 2017 49.3
 $1,161.7
 $(42.3) $(473.0) $4.7
 $651.1
 $8.0
 49.3
 $1,161.7
 $(42.3) $(473.0) $4.7
 $651.1
 $8.0
              
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 (72.0) 1.5
 (70.5) 0.7
Impact of adoption of new accounting standards 
 
 (9.1) 7.7
 
 (1.4) 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 
 
 (0.5) 
 
 (0.5) 
Stock dividend ($11.65 per share) 22.6
 626.4
 
 
 
 626.4
 
Distributions to noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 (0.5) (0.5) (0.2)
Adjustments to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest (Note 17) 
 0.6
 
 
 
 0.6
 (0.6)
Share-based compensation 
 4.7
 
 
 
 4.7
 
Shares issued or repurchased, net 0.1
 
 
 (1.6) 
 (1.6) 
Balance, December 31, 2018 72.0
 $1,793.4
 $(51.9) $(538.9) $5.7
 $1,208.3
 $7.9
              
Net income (loss) 
 
 
 (36.4) (2.1) (38.5) 0.1
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 
 
 3.1
 
 
 3.1
 
Dividend on common stock ($0.69 per share) 
 
 
 (50.0) 
 (50.0) 
Distributions to noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 (0.3)
Adjustments to redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interest (Note 17) 
 1.4
 
 
 
 1.4
 (1.4)
Share-based compensation 
 5.4
 
 
 
 5.4
 
Shares issued or repurchased, net 0.3
 (0.1) 
 (0.9) 
 (1.0) 
Balance, December 31, 2019 72.3
 $1,800.1
 $(48.8) $(626.2) $3.6
 $1,128.7
 $6.3
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

61





Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Description of Business:Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. ("A&B" or the "Company") is a real estate investment trust ("REIT") headquartered in Honolulu, andHawai‘i. The Company operates three3 segments: Commercial Real Estate; Land Operations; and Materials & Construction.
Commercial Real Estate: includes leasing, property management, redevelopment and development-for-hold activities. Significant assets include improved commercial real estate and urban ground leases. Income from this segment is principally generated by leasing and operating real estate assets.
Land Operations: includes planning, zoning, financing, constructing, purchasing, managing, selling, and investing in real property; leasing agricultural land; renewable energy; and diversified agribusiness. Primary assets include landholdings, renewable energy assets (investments in hydroelectric and solar facilities and power purchase agreements) and development projects. Income from this segment is principally generated by renewable energy operations, agricultural leases, select farming operations, development sales and fees, and parcel sales.
Materials & Construction: performs asphalt paving as prime contractor and subcontractor; imports and sells liquid asphalt; mines, processes and sells basalt aggregate; produces and sells asphaltic and ready-mix concrete; provides and sells various construction- and traffic-control-related products; and manufactures and sells precast concrete products. Assets include two grade A (prime) rock quarries, an asphalt storage terminal, paving hot mix plants and quarry and paving equipment. Income is generated principally by materials supply and paving construction.
The Company has completed a conversion process to comply with the requirements to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2017. In connection with our conversion to a REIT, the Company undertook the following actions:
On November 8, 2017, the Company completed a holding company merger ("Holding Company Merger") in order to facilitate the Company's ongoing REIT compliance. Pursuant to the Holding Company Merger, the then-existing Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. ("A&B Predecessor"), Alexander & Baldwin REIT Holdings, Inc., a Hawai`i corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiarydescription of A&B Predecessor (“A&B REIT Holdings”), and A&B REIT Merger Corporation, a Hawai`i corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of A&B REIT Holdings (“Merger Sub”) completed a merger through which Merger Sub was merged with and into A&B Predecessor, with A&B Predecessor continuing as the surviving corporation and being renamed "Alexander & Baldwin Investments, LLC." Additionally, as a result of the Holding Company Merger, A&B REIT Holdings replaced A&B Predecessor as the Hawai`i-based, publicly held corporation through which the Company’s operations are conducted, and all shares of common stock, including the reserve of common stock issuable under the outstanding awards and equity incentive compensation plans, of A&B Predecessor were converted into shares of A&B REIT Holdings common stock on a one-for-one basis; promptly following the merger A&B REIT Holdings was renamed “Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.” In these Notes to the Financial Statements, unless the context requires otherwise, references to A&B or the Company refer to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. prior to the consummation of the Holding Company Merger (subsequently renamed Alexander & Baldwin Investments, LLC) and to A&B REIT Holdings following consummation of the Holding Company Merger (subsequently renamed Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.).
On November 16, 2017 (the "Declaration Date"), the Company declared a distribution to its shareholders in the aggregate amount of $783 million (approximately $15.92 per share) (the "Special Distribution"), which represented the Company's previously undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits accumulated prior to January 1, 2017, the Company's REIT taxable income for the 2017 taxable year, and a substantial portioneach of the Company's estimated REIT taxable income for the 2018 taxable year. The Company completed the payment of the Special Distribution on January 23, 2018 ("the Distribution Date") through an aggregate of $156.6 million in cash and the issuance of 22,587,299 shares of the Company's common stock.
Reclassifications: Prior year financial statement amounts are reclassifiedreporting segments is as necessary to conform to the current year presentation related to the application of Rule 3-15 of Regulation S-X and the adoption of certain new accounting standards discussed below. There was no impact on net income or (accumulated deficit) / retained earnings as a result of the reclassifications. See Note 2 "Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information.

62



Rounding: Amounts in the consolidated financial statements and notes are rounded to the nearest tenth of a million. Accordingly, a recalculation of some per-share amounts and percentages, if based on the reported data, may result in differences.
follows:
2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Commercial Real Estate ("CRE") functions as a vertically integrated real estate investment company with core competencies in investments and acquisitions (i.e., raising capital, identifying opportunities and acquiring properties); construction and development (i.e., designing and ground-up development of new properties or repositioning and redevelopment of existing properties); in-house leasing and property management (i.e., executing new and renegotiating renewal lease arrangements, managing its properties' day-to-day operations and maintaining positive tenant relationships); and asset management (i.e., maintaining, upgrading and enhancing its portfolio of high-quality improved properties). The segment's preferred asset classes include improved properties in retail and industrial spaces and also urban ground leases. Its focus within improved retail properties, in particular, is on grocery-anchored neighborhood shopping centers that meet the daily needs of Hawai‘i citizens. Through its core competencies and with its experience and relationships in Hawai‘i, the Company seeks to create special places and experiences for Hawai‘i residents as well as providing venues and opportunities for tenants to thrive. Income from this segment is principally generated by owning, operating and leasing real estate assets.
Land Operations involves the management and optimization of the Company's historical landholdings primarily through the following activities: planning and entitlement of real property to facilitate sales; selling undeveloped land; and other operationally-diverse legacy business activities to employ its landholdings at their highest and best use. Financial results from this segment are principally derived from real estate development sales, land parcel sales, income/loss from real estate joint ventures and other legacy business activities.
Materials & Construction ("M&C") operates as Hawai‘i's largest asphalt paving contractor and is one of the state's largest natural materials and infrastructure construction companies. Such activities are primarily conducted through the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Grace Pacific LLC ("Grace Pacific"), a materials and construction company in Hawai‘i.
Grace Pacific owns hot-mix asphalt plants throughout the state that support its internal paving operations and third-party customers. Grace Pacific also owns and operates a rock quarry and processing plant in Makakilo, Hawai‘i. In addition, Grace Pacific offers a variety of related for-sale and for-rent services including temporary and permanent roadway traffic control (GP Roadway Solutions, Inc. or "GPRS"), structural precast/prestressed concrete (GP/RM Prestress, LLC or "GPRM") and other related products and services. Grace Pacific also holds a 50% interest in an unconsolidated affiliate, Maui Paving, LLC ("Maui Paving"), which operates primarily on the island of Maui.
Additional activity in the M&C segment includes its share of the results of operations of an unconsolidated investment, Pohaku Pa‘a LLC ("Pohaku"). Pohaku, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, operates rock quarries on the islands of Oahu and Maui and sells a wide range of products that include ready-mix concrete, rock and sand aggregates and cultured stone and related products.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company owns a portfolio of commercial real estate improved properties in Hawai‘i consisting of 22 retail centers, 10 industrial assets and 4 office properties, representing a total of 3.9 million square feet of gross leasable area; it also owns a portfolio of ground leases in Hawai‘i representing 153.8 acres as of December 31, 2019.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation:The Company presents its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP") as outlined in the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification (the "Codification" or "ASC"). The Codification is the single source of authoritative accounting principles applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.the Company (including all wholly-owned subsidiaries), as well as all other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Intercompany transactions and all wholly owned and controlled subsidiaries, after elimination of intercompany amounts.balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Significant investments in businesses, partnerships and limited liability companies in which the Company does not have a controlling financial interest, but the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for underusing the equity method.


A controlling financial interest is one in whichan entity may be established (i) through the Company hasholding a majority voting interest or one in which(ii) if the Company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. In determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary ofan entity that qualifies as a variable interest entity ("VIE"), as defined in which it has an interest, the Codification. The Company is requiredevaluates all partnerships, joint ventures and other arrangements with variable interests to make significant judgments with respectdetermine if the entity or arrangement qualifies as a VIE. VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to various factors including, but not limited to,finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the Company’s abilityfollowing characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the rights and ability of other investorsobligation to participate in decisions affectingabsorb the economic performanceexpected losses of the entity, and kick-out rights, among others. Activities that significantly affector (c) the economic performanceright to receive the expected returns of the entities in whichentity. If the entity or arrangement qualifies as a VIE and the Company has an interest include, but are not limitedis determined to establishing and modifying detailed business, development, marketing and sales plans, approving and modifying the project budget, approving design changes and associated overruns, if any, and approving project financing, among others. The Company has not consolidated any variable interest entity in which the Company does not also have voting control because it has determined that it is notbe the primary beneficiary, since decisionsthe Company is required to directconsolidate the activitiesassets, liabilities, and results of operations of the VIE. The Company reevaluates whether an entity is a VIE as needed (i.e., when assessing reconsideration events that most significantly impactresult in changes in the entity’s performance are shared byfactors mentioned above) as part of determining if the consolidation or equity method treatment remains appropriate. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had an interest in various unconsolidated joint venture partners.ventures that the Company accounts for using the equity method. Other than the obligations described in Note 14. "Commitments and Contingencies," obligations of the Company's joint ventures do not have recourse to the Company and the Company's maximum exposure is limited to its investment.
The consolidated financial statements include the results of GP/RM,GPRM, a supplier in the precast concrete industry, and GLP Asphalt, LLC ("GLP"), an importer and distributor of liquid asphalt, which are owned 51 percent51% and 70 percent,70%, respectively. These entities are consolidated because the Company holds a controlling financial interest through its majority ownership of the voting interests ofinterest in the entities. The remaining interest in these entities is reported as noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements. Profits, losses and cash distributions are allocated in accordance with the respective operating agreements.
Use of Estimates:The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaGAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. Estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to: (i) asset impairments, including intangible assets and goodwill, (ii) litigation and contingencies, (iii) revenue recognition for long-term real estate developments and construction contracts, (iv) pension and postretirement estimates, and (v) income taxes. Future results could be materially affected if actual results differ from these estimates and assumptions.
Customer Concentration: Grace derives aA significant portion of Materials & Construction revenues from a limited customer base. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,revenue and 2015, revenue of approximately $67.7 million, $52.0 million, and $38.1 million, respectively, wasaccounts receivable is generated directly and indirectly from projects administered by the City and County of Honolulu.Honolulu and from the State of Hawai‘i. Reductions in funding of infrastructure projects by these government agencies could reduce our revenue and profits from our M&C segment. Further, although the customer mix of real estate sales in any given period in our Land Operations segment may be diverse in any given period, during the year ended December 31, 2018, the Land Operations segment recognized $162.2 million of gross profit in connection with the sale of approximately 41,000 acres of Maui agricultural land and 100% of the Company's ownership interest in Central Maui Feedstocks LLC and Kulolio Ranch LLC (collectively referred to as the "Agricultural Land Sale") in December 2018.
Reclassifications: During the first quarter of 2019, the Company changed the presentation of its balance sheet to be unclassified in order to be comparable with other REIT peers. The change was applied to all periods presented retrospectively. Previously reported captions for Total assets, Total liabilities and captions within Equity were not impacted.
In November 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") finalized the Disclosure Update Simplification Project, which eliminated Rule 3-15(a)(1) reporting of Gain or Loss on Sale of Properties by REITs. To conform with ASC 360 and the SEC rule change, the Company has classified the gain on dispositions of real estate assets in operating income in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company reclassified the prior periods to conform to the current year presentation. This change resulted in an increase in operating income of $9.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Rounding: Amounts in the consolidated financial statements and notes are rounded to the nearest tenth of a million. Accordingly, a recalculation of some per-share amounts and percentages, if based on the reported data, may result in differences.
2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Real estate property, net: Real estate property, net primarily represents long-lived physical assets associated with the CRE segment's leasing activity (e.g., improved property leases and ground leases); it also includes landholdings and related assets in the Land Operations segment that the Company holds for either possible future development or future monetization as part of its simplification strategy. The balance primarily consists of land, buildings and improvements and is recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.
Expenditures for additions, improvements and other enhancements to real estate properties are capitalized, and minor replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend asset lives are charged to expense as incurred. When assets


related to real estate properties are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in results of operations for the respective period.
Certain costs are capitalized related to the development and redevelopment of real estate properties, including pre-construction costs; real estate taxes; insurance; construction costs; and salaries and related costs of personnel directly involved. Additionally, the Company makes estimates as to the probability of certain development and redevelopment projects being completed. If the Company determines the development or redevelopment is no longer probable of completion, the Company expenses all capitalized costs which are not recoverable.
Acquisitions of real estate properties: Acquisitions of real estate properties are evaluated to determine if they should be accounted for as asset acquisitions or business combinations. Under current guidance, acquisitions of real estate properties are generally considered asset acquisitions. Under asset acquisition accounting, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and tenant improvements), identifiable intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above- and below- market leases and in-place leases), and assumed debt based on an evaluation of available information at the date of the acquisition. Based on these estimates, the purchase consideration is allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. Transaction costs incurred during the acquisition process are capitalized as a component of the purchase consideration.
In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities and uses various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections using appropriate discount and capitalization rates, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation and other available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
Above-market and below-market lease values are estimated based on the present value (using a discount rate reflecting the risks associated with leases acquired) of the difference between: (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the leases negotiated and in-place at the time of acquisition and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the property or an equivalent property, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the estimated term of any below-market, fixed-rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized to base rental revenue over the related lease term plus fixed-rate renewal options, as appropriate.
The purchase price is further allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationship values based on management's evaluation of the specific characteristics of the acquired lease portfolio and the Company's overall relationship with the anchor tenants. Such amounts are amortized to expense over the remaining initial lease term (and expected renewal periods for tenant relationships).
Real estate developments: Real estate developments represent certain costs capitalized and presented in the Land Operations segment that relate to (i) active real estate development projects intended for sale or (ii) potential future real estate development projects intended for lease that would be part of future CRE segment operations. For potential future real estate development projects intended for lease, when management with the relevant authority has approved expenditures for activities clearly associated with the development and construction of a CRE segment project (generally after all required government agency approvals have been obtained), the capitalized costs associated with such project (i.e., historical cost of land) will be presented as Real estate property, net.
Certain costs capitalized relating to active real estate development projects intended for sale may include pre-construction costs (e.g., costs related to land acquisition); construction costs (e.g., grading, roads, water and sewage systems, landscaping and project amenities); direct overhead costs (e.g., utilities, maintenance, insurance and real estate taxes); capitalized interest; and salaries and related costs of personnel directly involved.
For development projects, capitalized costs are allocated using the direct method for expenditures that are specifically associated with the unit being sold and the relative-sales-value method for expenditures that benefit the entire project. Direct overhead costs incurred after the development project is substantially complete and ready to be marketed are charged to selling, general and administrative expense as incurred. All indirect overhead costs are charged to selling, general and administrative costs as incurred.
Cash flows related to active real estate development projects intended for sale are classified as operating activities.
Capitalized Interest: Interest costs on developments and major redevelopments are capitalized as part of real estate development and redevelopment projects that have not yet been placed into service. Capitalization of interest commences when development activities and expenditures begin and end when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use or


ready to be marketed. Total interest costs incurred were $34.1 million, $35.9 million, and $26.4 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Capitalized interest costs related to development activities were $1.0 million, $0.6 million and $0.8 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Other property, net: Other property, net represents all other long-lived physical assets other than those presented in Real estate property, net and Real estate developments. The balance primarily consists of long-lived assets in the M&C segment, but also contains corporate long-lived physical assets and Land Operations long-lived physical assets that are used in other Land Operations activities and are not presented in Real estate property, net or Real estate developments above. Other property, net is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend asset lives are charged to expense as incurred.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018 other property, net was as follows (in millions):
  2019 2018
Land $38.4
 $42.2
Buildings 19.7
 20.4
Asphalt plants, machinery and equipment 105.5
 116.7
Water, power and sewer systems 30.6
 33.0
Other property improvements 6.8
 8.1
Subtotal 201.0
 220.4
Accumulated depreciation (76.6) (84.9)
Other property, net $124.4
 $135.5

Depreciation: Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the units-of-production method for quarry production-related assets. Estimated useful lives of property are as follows:
ClassificationRange of Life (in years)
Building and improvements10 to 40
Leasehold improvements5 to 10 (lesser of useful life or lease term)
Water, power and sewer systems5 to 50
Asphalt plants, machinery and equipment2 to 35
Other property improvements3 to 35

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016, and 2015, revenue of approximately $60.2was $35.6 million, $50.1$32.5 million and $80.8$32.3 million, respectively,respectively.
Intangible Assets: Real estate intangible assets are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as Real estate intangible assets, net and are generally related to the acquisition of commercial real estate properties. Intangible assets acquired in 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
  2019 2018 2017
  Amount Weighted Average Life (Years) Amount Weighted Average Life (Years) Amount Weighted Average Life (Years)
In-place leases $23.2
 8.2 $32.0
 12.4 $0.2
 2.2
Favorable leases 4.3
 4.7 6.7
 11.7 0.1
 1.1

Real Estate intangible assets, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions):
 2019 2018
In-place leases$125.2
 $102.1
Favorable leases29.0
 24.6
Amortization of in-place leases(63.4) (53.2)
Amortization of favorable leases(15.9) (13.7)
Real estate intangible assets, net$74.9
 $59.8



Other intangible assets are included in Prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the gross carrying amount of other intangible assets was generated directly$20.2 million and indirectly from$16.3 million, with related accumulated amortization of $7.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively.
Aggregate intangible asset amortization expense was $12.5 million, $8.7 million, and $6.0 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Estimated amortization expenses related to intangible assets over the Statenext five years are as follows (in millions):
 Estimated
Amortization
2020$12.5
202110.2
20228.4
20237.5
20245.3

In situations in which a lease or leases with a tenant have been, or are expected to be, terminated early, the Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of Hawai`i, where Grace served as general contractordepreciable or subcontractor.amortizable assets of the associated assets related to the lease terminated (i.e., tenant improvements, above and below market lease intangibles, in-place lease value and leasing commissions). Based upon consideration of the facts and circumstances surrounding the termination, the Company may accelerate the depreciation and amortization of such associated assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase. The Company carries these investments at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash: The Company's restricted cash balance at December 31, 2018 of $223.5 million primarily consisted of proceeds from §1031 tax-deferred sales held in escrow pending future use to purchase new real estate assets. There were no outstanding checksmaterial amounts of proceeds from §1031 tax-deferred sales in excessthe balance as of funds on deposit at December 31, 2017 and 2016.2019.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Allowances for doubtful accounts are established by management based on estimates of collectability. Estimates of collectability are principally based on an evaluation of the current financial condition of the Company’s customers and their payment history, which are regularly monitored by the Company. The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts, included on the consolidated balance sheets as an offset to “AccountsAccounts receivable, net for the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018 and 20152017, were as follows (in millions):
 Balance at
Beginning of Year
Provision for Bad DebtWrite-offs
and Other
Balance at
End of Year
2019$2.0$1.9$(1.2)$2.7
2018$1.4$1.3$(0.7)$2.0
2017$1.0$1.0$(0.6)$1.4

 Balance at
Beginning of Year
 Provision for Bad Debt Write-offs
and Other
 Balance at
End of Year
2017$1.0 $1.0 $(0.6) $1.4
2016$1.7 $0.8 $(1.5) $1.0
2015$1.7 $0.4 $(0.4) $1.7
As of December 31, 2019, the Company's allowances for doubtful accounts relate only to accounts receivable in the M&C segment (unrelated to leases).

63



Operating CycleNotes receivable: The Company uses the duration of the construction contracts that range from one year to three years as its operating cycle for purposes of classifying assets and liabilities related to contracts. AccountsCompany's notes receivable and contracts retention collectible after one year related to the Materials & Construction segment are included in current assets inrecorded at cost within Other receivables on the consolidated balance sheets and amountedsheets.  Generally, a loans allowance is established when the Company determines that it will be unable to $8.0 million and $8.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Accounts and contracts payable related tocollect any remaining amounts due under the Materials & Construction segment payable after one year are included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and amounted to $0.4 million and $0.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.agreement.
Inventories:Sugar inventories were stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market value. Materials & supplies and Materials & Construction segment inventoryInventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally average cost, first-in, first-out basis) or marketnet realizable value.
Inventories atas of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 were as follows (in millions):
 2019 2018
Asphalt$8.0
 $9.4
Processed rock and sand6.6
 9.5
Work in progress2.9
 4.0
Retail merchandise2.0
 2.0
Parts, materials and supplies inventories1.2
 1.6
Total$20.7
 $26.5

 2017 2016
Sugar inventories$
 $17.5
Asphalt12.2
 7.4
Processed rock, Portland cement, and sand13.5
 12.6
Work in progress2.8
 3.0
Retail merchandise1.7
 1.7
Parts, materials and supplies inventories1.7
 1.1
Total$31.9
 $43.3

Property: Property
Leases - The Company as Lessee: The Company determines if an arrangement is stateda lease at cost, netinception by considering whether that arrangement conveys the right to use an identified asset for a period of accumulated depreciationtime in exchange for consideration. Operating leases are included in Operating lease right-of-use assets ("ROU assets") and amortization. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Replacements, maintenance, and repairs that do not improve or extend asset lives are charged to expense as incurred. Upon acquiring commercial real estate that is deemed a business,Operating lease liabilities in the Company records land, buildings, leases above and below market, and other intangible assets based on their fair values. Costs related to due diligence are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation: Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the units-of-production method for quarry production-related assets. Estimated useful lives of property are as follows:
ClassificationRange of Life (in years)
Building and improvements10 to 40
Leasehold improvements5 to 10 (lesser of useful life or lease term)
Water, power and sewer systems5 to 50
Rock crushing and asphalt plants25 to 35
Machinery and equipment2 to 35
Other property improvements3 to 35
Real Estate Developments: Expenditures for real estate developments are capitalized during construction and are classified as real estate developments on theCompany's consolidated balance sheets. When constructionROU assets and lease liabilities related to finance leases are included in Other property, net and Notes payable and other debt, respectively, in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
ROU assets represent the Company's right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate and are not readily determinable, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term of the lease payments at commencement date. ROU assets also include any lease payments made at or before the commencement date and excludes any lease incentives received. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is substantially complete,reasonably certain that the costsCompany will exercise that option. Operating lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
In connection with its application of the lease guidance, the Company has evaluated the lease and non-lease components within its leases where it is the lessee and has elected, for all classes of underling assets, the practical expedient to present lease and non-lease components in its lease agreements as one component. The Company has also elected, for all classes of underlying assets, to not recognize lease liabilities and lease assets for leases with a term of 12 months or less.
Goodwill: The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually or between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount.
If the results of the Company's test indicates that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
Refer to Note 22, "Goodwill," for additional detail.
Fair Value Measurements: ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820"), as amended, establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The hierarchy places the highest priority on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and assigns the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of inputs within the hierarchy are reclassifieddefined as either Real Estate Heldfollows:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for Saleidentical assets or Property, based uponliabilities in active markets.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s intent to either sellown assumptions about the completedassumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
If the technique used to hold itmeasure fair value includes inputs from multiple levels of the fair value hierarchy, the lowest level of significant input determines the placement of the entire fair value measurement in the hierarchy.
The Company records its interest rate swaps at fair value. The fair values of the Company's interest rate swaps (Level 2 measurements) are based on the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date and are determined using interest rate pricing models and interest rate related observable inputs. See Note 15, "Derivative Instruments," for fair value information regarding the Company's derivative instruments.
The fair value of the Company's cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net and short-term borrowings approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of the instruments.
The fair value of the Company's notes receivable approximates the carrying amount of $15.7 million at December 31, 2019. The fair value and carrying amount of these notes was $16.3 million at December 31, 2018. The fair value of these notes is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis in which the Company uses unobservable inputs such as an investment property, respectively. Cash flowsmarket interest rates determined by the loan-to-value and market capitalization rates related to real estate developments arethe underlying collateral at which management believes similar loans would be made and classified as either operating or investing activities, based upona Level 3 measurement in the Company’s intention to sell the property or retain ownershipfair value hierarchy.


The carrying amount and fair value of the property as an investment following completion of construction.
For development projects, capitalized costs are allocated using the direct method for expenditures that are specifically associated with the unit being sold and the relative-sales-value method for expenditures that benefit the entire project. Capitalized development costs typically include costs related to land acquisition, grading, roads, water and sewage systems, landscaping, capitalized interest, and project amenities. Direct overhead costs incurred after the development project is substantially complete, such as utilities, maintenance and real estate taxes, are charged to selling, general and administrative expense as incurred. All indirect overhead costs are charged to selling, general and administrative costs as incurred.
Capitalized Interest: Interest costs incurred in connection with significant expenditures for real estate developments, the construction of assets, or investments in real estate joint ventures are capitalized during the period in which activities

64



necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use are in progress. Capitalization of interest is discontinued when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalization of interest on investments in real estate joint ventures is recorded until the underlying investee commences its principal operations, which is typically when the investee has other-than-ancillary revenue generation. Total interest cost incurredCompany's debt at December 31, 2019 was $26.4 million, $28.3$704.6 million and $29.1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Capitalized interest in 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $0.9 million, $2.0 million, and $2.3$727.3 million, respectively, and was principally related$778.1 million and $758.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018. The fair value of debt is calculated by discounting the future cash flows of the debt at rates based on instruments with similar risk, terms and maturities as compared to the Company's investment in The Collection,existing debt arrangements (Level 3).
During the Company’s Maui Business Park II, and Kamalani projects.
Real Estate Assets Held for Sale: The Company separately classifies assets held for sale in its consolidated financial statements. As ofyears ended December 31, 2017, the Company has Hawai`i real estate developments2019, 2018 and certain U.S. Mainland commercial properties that were classified as held for sale with a total net asset value of $67.4 million. Real estate investments to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amounts or estimated fair value, less costs to sell. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded aggregate impairment charges of $49.7 million, $79.4 million and $22.4 million related to goodwill and/or other long-lived assets. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary-impairment charge of $188.6 million related to equity method investments. See further discussion in the respective sections below. The Company has classified the fair value measurements as a Level 3 measurement in the fair value hierarchy because they involve significant unobservable inputs such as cash flow projections, discount rates and management assumptions.
Self-Insured Liabilities: The Company is self-insured for certain U.S. Mainlandlosses that include, but are not limited to, employee health, workers’ compensation, general liability, real and personal property, and real estate construction warranty and defect claims. When feasible, the Company obtains third-party insurance coverage to limit its exposure to these claims. When estimating its self-insured liabilities, the Company considers a number of factors, including historical claims experience, demographic factors, and valuations provided by independent third-parties.
Revenue Recognition and Leases - The Company as a Lessor: Sources of revenue for the Company primarily include commercial property rentals, sales of real estate, real estate development projects, material sales and paving construction projects. The Company generates revenue from 3 distinct business segments:
Commercial Real Estate: The Commercial Real Estate segmentowns, operates, leases, and manages a portfolio of retail, office, and industrial properties assets.in Hawai‘i; it also leases urban land in Hawai‘i to third-party lessees. Commercial Real Estate revenue is recognized under lease accounting guidance with the Company as lessor.
Leases - The following table summarizesCompany as Lessor: The Company reviews its contracts to determine if they qualify as a lease. A contract is determined to be a lease when the right to substantially all of the economic benefits and to direct the use of an identified asset is transferred to a customer over a defined period of time for consideration. During this review, the Company evaluates among other items, asset specification, substitution rights, purchase options, operating rights and control over the asset during the contract period.
The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for separately under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company has elected the practical expedient to not separate non-lease components from lease components for all classes of underlying assets heldwhere the component follows the same timing and pattern as the lease component and the lease component is classified as an operating lease. Non-lease components included in rental revenue primarily consist of tenant reimbursements for salecommon area maintenance and liabilitiesother services paid for by the lessor and utilized by the lessee. Under the practical expedient, the Company accounts for the single, combined component under leasing guidance as the lease component is the predominant component in the contract.
Rental revenue is primarily derived from operating leases and, therefore, is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Fixed contractual payments from the Company's leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Straight-line rental revenue commences when the customer assumes control of the leased premises. Accrued straight-line rents receivable represents the amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with lease agreements. Certain of the Company's lease agreements include terms for contingent rental revenue (e.g. percentage rents based on tenant sales volume) and tenant reimbursed property taxes, which are both accounted for as variable payments.
Certain of the Company's leases include termination and/or extension options. Termination options allow the customer to terminate the lease prior to the end of the lease term under specific circumstances. The Company's extension options generally require a re-negotiation with the customer at market rates. Initial direct costs, primarily commissions, related to the leasing of properties are capitalized on the balance sheet and amortized over the lease term. All other costs to negotiate or arrange a lease are expensed as incurred.
Accounts receivable related to leases are regularly evaluated for collectability, considering factors including, but not limited to, the credit quality of the customer, historical trends of the customer, and changes in customer payment terms. Upon determination that the collectability of a customer receivable is not probable, the Company will reverse the receivable and record a corresponding reduction of revenue previously recognized. Subsequent revenue is recorded on a cash basis until collectability on related billings becomes probable.


Land Operations:Revenues from sales of real estate are recognized at the point in time when control of the underlying goods is transferred to the customer and the payment is due (generally on the closing date). For certain development projects, the Company will use a percentage of completion for revenue recognition. Under this method, the amount of revenue recognized is based on the development costs that have been incurred throughout the reporting period as a percentage of total expected developments associated with the development project.
Materials & Construction:Revenue from the Materials & Construction segment is primarily generated from material sales and paving and construction contracts. The recognition of revenue is based on the underlying terms of the transactions.
Materials: Revenues from material sales, which include basalt aggregate, liquid asphalt and hot mix asphalt, are usually recognized at a point in time when control of the underlying goods is transferred to the customers (generally this occurs when materials are picked up by customers or their agents) and when the Company has a present right to payment for materials sold.
Construction: The Company's construction contracts generally contain a single performance obligation as the promise to transfer individual goods or services are not separately identifiable from other promises in the contracts and is, therefore, not distinct. Revenue is earned from construction contracts over a period of time as control is continuously transferred to customers.
Construction contracts can generally be categorized into two types of contracts with customers based on the respective payment terms; either lump sum or unit priced. Lump sum contracts require the total amount of work be performed under a single fixed price irrespective of actual quantities or actual costs. Earnings on both unit price contracts and lump sum fixed-price paving contracts are recognized using the percentage of completion, cost-to-cost, input method, as it is able to faithfully depict the transfer of control of the underlying assets heldto the customer.
Related to its long-term construction contracts, due to the nature of the work required to be performed, estimating total revenue and cost at completion of the contract is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Such estimates of contract revenue and cost are dependent on a number of factors that may change during a contract performance period, resulting in changes to estimated contract profitability. These factors include, but are not limited to, the completeness and accuracy of the original bid; changes in the timing of scheduled work; change orders; unusual weather conditions; changes in costs of labor and/or materials; changes in productivity expectations; and the expected, or actual, resolution terms for saleclaims. Management evaluates changes in estimates on a contract by contract basis and uses the cumulative catch-up method to account for the changes in the period in which they are determined.
Certain construction contracts include retainage provisions. The balances billed but not paid by customers pursuant to these provisions generally become due upon completion and acceptance of the project work or products by the owners.
The Company deems its contract prices reflective of the standalone selling prices of the underlying goods and services since the contracts are required to go through a competitive bidding process.
On a consolidated basis, in addition to disclosing amounts recorded as contract assets or contract liabilities in its consolidated balance sheets, the Company discloses information about the amount of contract consideration allocated to either wholly unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations (refer to Note 6, "Revenue and Contract Balances"). Related to this disclosure, the Company has elected to not disclose information about the amount of contract consideration allocated to remaining performance obligations for certain contracts that have original expected durations of one year or less. Although rare, this may occur with contracts for sales of real estate that are executed as of December 31, 2017:the end of the period with control of the underlying assets to be transferred to the customer subsequent to the end of the period. The closing date of such transactions will generally occur within one year or less of the contract execution date.
Real Estate Developments$21.1
Property – Net64.8
Other Assets3.9
Total assets89.8
Impairment of real estate assets(22.4)
Real estate held for sale$67.4
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets: Long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for possible impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In such an evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset are compared with the amount recorded for the asset to determine if its carrying value is not recoverable. If this review determines that the recorded value will not be recovered, the amount recorded for the asset is reduced to estimated fair value. These asset impairment analyses are highly subjective because they require managementThe measurement of fair value involves judgments and estimates including, but not limited to, make assumptions and apply considerable judgments to, among others, estimates of the timing and amount of future cash flows, expected useful lives of the assets, comparable replacement assets, uncertainty about future events, includingsuch as changes in economic conditions, changes in operating performance, and changes in the use of the assets and ongoing costs of maintenance and improvements of the assets, and thus, the accounting estimates may change from period to period.assets. If management uses different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future periods, A&B’sthe Company’s financial condition or its future operatingfinancial results could be materially impacted. In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairments of long-lived assets or finite-lived intangible assets.


During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company concluded that the carrying values of certain paving and quarry assets in its Materials & Construction segment were not recoverable due primarily to persisting, competitive market pressures that have negatively affected sales and margins. As a result, the Company recorded impairment charges of $40.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2018 to reduce the carrying amounts to the estimated fair value. The Company classified these fair value measurements as Level 3. The weighted average discount rate used in the intangible valuation was 13.5%. Changes to Materials & Construction fixed assets and intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2018 consisted of the following (in millions):
Intangible AssetsMaterials & Construction Fixed AssetsMaterials & Construction
 
Balance, January 1, 2018$16.5
 Balance, January 1, 2018$139.5
Additions to intangible assets
 Additions to fixed assets11.1
Amortization(0.9) Depreciation(11.2)
Intangible impairment(7.0) Fixed asset impairment(33.6)
Balance, December 31, 2018$8.6
 Balance, December 31, 2018$105.8

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded aggregate impairment charges of $22.4 million related to certain of itsthe Company's U.S. Mainland commercial properties that were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, as a result of a change in its strategy for development activities, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $11.7 million related to certain non-active, long-term development projects.sale. The impairment loss recorded reduced the carrying amounts to the estimated fair value, reflecting the change to the Company’s development-for-sale strategy to de-risk its portfolio by not pursuing certain long-term projects thatimpaired assets were not in active development and instead focus on projects with a short-term lifespan, generally 3 to 5 years.
The impairment charges are presented within Impairment of real estate assets in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. There were no material long-lived asset impairment charges recorded in 2015.
Impairment of Investments: The Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates are reviewed for impairment whenever there is evidence that fair value may be below carrying cost. An investment is written down to fair value if fair value is below carrying cost and the impairment is believed to be other-than-temporary. In evaluating the fair value of an investment and whether any identified impairment is other-than-temporary, significant estimates and considerable judgments are involved. These estimates and judgments are based, in part, on the Company’s current and future evaluation of economic conditions in general, as well as a joint venture’s current and future plans. Additionally, these impairment calculations are highly subjective because they also require management to make assumptions and apply judgments to estimates regarding the timing and amount of future cash flows that may consider various factors, including sales prices, development costs, market conditions and absorption rates, probabilities related to various cash flow scenarios, and appropriate discount rates based on the perceived risks, among others. In evaluating whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers all available

65



information, including the length of time and extent of the impairment, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the affiliate, the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value, and projected industry and economic trends, among others. Changes in these and other assumptions could affect the projected operational results and fair value of the unconsolidated affiliates, and accordingly, may require valuation adjustments to the Company’s investments that may materially impact the Company’s financial condition or its future operating results. For example, if current market conditions deteriorate significantly or a joint venture’s plans change materially, impairment charges may be required in future periods, and those charges could be material.
Weakness in particular real estate markets, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing or development approvals, and changes in the Company’s development strategy, among other factors, may affect the value or feasibility of certain development projects owned by the Company or by its joint ventures and could lead to additional impairment charges in the future.
Fair Value Measurements: The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and short-term borrowings approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of the instruments. The carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s debt at December 31, 2017 was $631.2 million and $642.3 million, respectively, and $515.1 million and $529.3 million at December 31, 2016, respectively. The fair value of debt is calculated by discounting the future cash flows of the debt at rates based on instruments with similar risk, terms and maturities as compared to the Company’s existing debt arrangements (level 2).
FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), as amended, establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The hierarchy places the highest priority on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and assigns the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of inputs within the hierarchy are defined as follows:     
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
If the technique used to measure fair value includes inputs from multiple levels of the fair value hierarchy, the lowest level of significant input determines the placement of the entire fair value measurement in the hierarchy.
The Company's U.S. Mainland commercial properties as well as the Company's non-active long-term development projects that were impaired during each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, represent assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition. The Company estimated the fair values of these long-lived assets based on the Company’s own judgments about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the real estate assets and available, observable market data. The Company classified these fair value measurements as Level 3 inputs. After3.
Impairment of Investments in Affiliates: The Company's investments in affiliates that are accounted for under the impairment charges recorded, the aggregate carrying value of the impaired U.S. Mainland commercial properties was $46.3 million, and the aggregate carrying value of the non-active, long-term development projects were not material.
Intangible Assets: Intangible assetsequity method are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as other non-current assets and are related to the acquisition of commercial properties. Intangible assets acquired in 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 2017 2016
 Amount Weighted Average Life (Years) Amount Weighted Average Life (Years)
In-place/favorable leases$0.3
 1.6 $8.5
 7.0
Intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 included the following (in millions):

66



 2017 2016
In-place leases$70.2
 $69.9
Favorable leases17.9
 17.9
Permitted quarry rights18.0
 18.0
Contract backlog2.6
 2.6
Trade name/customer relationships2.2
 2.2
Accumulated amortization(64.0) (56.8)
Total assets$46.9
 $53.8
Aggregate intangible asset amortization was $6.0 million, $9.2 million, and $10.5 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Estimated amortization expenses related to intangible assets over the next five years are as follows (in millions):
 Estimated
Amortization
2018$5.4
2019$4.5
2020$3.6
2021$3.1
2022$2.9
Goodwill: The Company reviews goodwillreviewed for impairment at the reporting unit level annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicatethere is evidence that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unitmay be below carrying cost. An investment is less than its carrying amount. The goodwill impairment test estimates thewritten down to fair value of a reporting unit using various methodologies, including discounted cash flows and market multiples. The discounted cash flow approach relies on a number of assumptions, including future macroeconomic conditions, market factors specific to the reporting unit, the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the business over an extended period of time, long-term growth rates for the business, and a discount rate that considers the risks related to the amount and timing of the cash flows, among others. Under the market multiple methodology, the estimate ofif fair value is based on market multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciationbelow carrying cost and amortization) or revenues. When using market multiples of EBITDA or revenues, the Company must make judgments about the comparability of those multiplesimpairment is believed to be other-than-temporary.
Refer to Note 5, "Investments in closed and proposed transactions and comparability of multiplesAffiliates," for guideline companies.further discussion.
If the results of the Company's test indicates that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the Company's reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in millions):
 Materials & Construction Commercial Real Estate Total
Balance, January 1, 2016$93.6
 $8.7
 $102.3
Changes to goodwill
 
 
Balance, December 31, 201693.6
 8.7
 102.3
Changes to goodwill
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2017$93.6
 $8.7
 $102.3
Revenue Recognition:Share-Based Compensation: The Company has a wide variety of revenue sources, including sales of real estate, commercial property rentals, material sales, paving construction, and the sales of raw sugar and molasses. Before recognizing revenue, the Company assesses the underlying terms of the transaction to ensure that recognition meets the requirements of relevant accounting standards. In general, the Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the service or product has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

67



Sales of Real Estate Revenue Recognition: Sales of real estate revenue involve proceeds from the sale of a variety of real estate development inventory. Real estate development inventory may include industrial lots, residential lots, agricultural lots, condominium units, single-family homes and multi-family homes. Sales are recorded when the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the buyers (generally on closing dates), adequate initial and continuing investments have been received, and collection of remaining balances, if any, is reasonably assured. For certain development projects that have continuing post-closing involvement and for which total revenue and capital costs are reasonably estimable, the Company uses the percentage-of-completion method for revenue recognition. Under this method, the amount of revenue recognized is based on development costs that have been incurred through the reporting period as a percentage of total expected development cost associated with the development project. This generally results in a stabilized gross margin percentage, but requires significant judgment and estimates.
Commercial Real Estate Revenue Recognition: Commercial Real Estate revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases, including periods for which no rent is due (typically referred to as “rent holidays”). Differences between revenues recognized and amounts due under respective lease agreements are recorded as increases or decreases, as applicable, to deferred rent receivable. Also included in rental revenue are certain tenant reimbursements and percentage rents determined in accordance with the terms of the leases. Income arising from tenant rents that are contingent upon the sales of the tenant exceeding a defined threshold are recognized only after the contingency has been resolved (i.e., sales thresholds have been achieved).
Construction Contracts and Related Products Revenue Recognition: Grace generates revenue primarily from material sales and paving contracts. The recognition of revenue is based on the underlying terms of the transaction.
Materials:Revenues from material sales, which include basalt aggregate, liquid asphalt and hot mix asphalt, are recognized when title to the product and risk of loss passes to third parties (generally this occurs when the product is picked up by customers or their agents) and when collection is reasonably assured.
Construction:A majority of paving contracts is performed for Hawai`i state, federal, and county governments. Unit price contracts, which comprise a significant portion of Grace's paving contracts, require Grace to provide line-item deliverables at fixed unit prices based on approved quantities irrespective of Grace’s actual per unit costs. Earnings on unit price contracts are recognized as quantities are delivered. Lump sum contracts require that the total amount of work be performed for a single price irrespective of actual quantities or Grace’s actual costs. Earnings on fixed-price paving contracts are generally recognized using the percentage-of-completion method with progress toward completion measured on the basis of unit cost of work completed as of a specific date to an estimate of the total unit cost of work to be delivered under each contract. Grace uses this method as its management considers this to be the best available measure of progress on contracts. Contracts in progress are reviewed regularly, and sales and earnings may be adjusted based on revisions to assumption and estimates, including, but not limited to, revisions to job performance, job site conditions, changes to the scope of work, estimated contract costs, progress toward completion, changes in internal and external factors or conditions and final contract settlement. Selling, general and administrative costs are charged torecords compensation expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses become evident.
Sugar and Molasses Revenue Recognition: Revenue from sugar sales is recorded when title to the product and risk of loss passes to third parties (generally this occurs when the product is shipped or delivered to customers) and when collection is reasonably assured.
Agricultural Costs: Costs of growing and harvesting sugar cane are charged to the cost of inventory in the year incurred and to cost of sales as sugar is sold.
Discontinued Operations: On December 31, 2015, due to continuing and significant operating losses stemming from low sugar prices and poor production levels, the Company determined it would cease sugar operations at its Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company (“HC&S”) division on Maui upon completion of its final harvest in 2016. HC&S completed its harvest in December 2016, and the Company ceased its sugar operations (the "Cessation"). As a result, the Company concluded that its sugar operations met the requirements to be reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Seeshare-based payment awards made to employees and directors. The Company’s various equity plans are more fully described in Note 4, "Discontinued Operations" for additional detail.13, "Share-Based Payment Awards."
Employee Benefit Plans: The Company provides a wide range of benefits to existing employees and retired employees, including single-employer defined benefit plans, postretirement, defined contribution plans, post-employment and health care benefits. The Company records amounts relating to these plans based on various actuarial assumptions, including discount rates, assumed rates of return, compensation increases, turnover rates and health care cost trend rates.rate trends. The Company reviews its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and makes modifications to the assumptions based on current economic conditions and trends. The Company believes that the assumptions utilized in recording obligations under the Company’s plans,

68



which are presented in Note 11, “Employee"Employee Benefit Plans," are reasonable based on its experience and on advice from its independent actuaries; however, differences in actual experience or changes in the assumptions may materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Share-Based Compensation:Interest and other income (expense),net for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 included the following (in millions):
  2019 2018 2017
Pension and postretirement benefit (expense) $(3.1) $(3.0) $(3.8)
Interest income 3.0
 1.5
 5.3
Gain (loss) on sale of joint venture interest 2.6
 4.2
 
Reductions in solar investments, net (0.1) (0.5) (2.6)
Other income (expense) 0.8
 0.1
 0.6
Interest and other income (expense), net $3.2
 $2.3
 $(0.5)

Income Taxes: The Company records compensationmakes certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for all share-based payment awards made to employeesfinancial statement purposes. These estimates and directors. The Company’s various equity plansjudgments are more fully describedapplied in Note 13, "Share-Based Awards."
Redeemable Non-controlling Interest: Non-controlling intereststhe calculation of tax credits, tax benefits and deductions, and in subsidiaries that are redeemable for cash or otherthe calculation of certain deferred tax assets outside of the Company’s control are classified as mezzanine equity, outside of equity and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are adjusted to fair value on each balance sheet date. The resultingthe extent necessary to reflect tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. Adjustments may be required to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities due to changes in fair value oftax laws and audit adjustments by tax authorities. To the estimated redemption amount, increases or decreases,extent


adjustments are recorded with correspondingrequired in any given period, the adjustments against retained earnings or,would be included within the tax provision in the absenceaccompanying consolidated statements of retained earnings, common stock.operations.
Discontinued Operations: In December 2016, the Company completed its final sugar harvest and ceased its sugar operations. Costs related to the cessation of sugar operations are presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. Liabilities related to the cessation of sugar operations are presented within Accrued and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 4, "Discontinued Operations," and Note 18, "Cessation of Sugar Operations," for additional detail.
Earnings Per Share (“EPS”): Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed and disclosed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards CodificationASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share. The Company utilizes the two-class method to compute earnings available to common shareholders. Under the two-class method, earnings are adjusted by accretion amounts to redeemable noncontrolling interests recorded at redemption value. The adjustments represent in-substance dividend distributions to the noncontrolling interest holder as the holder has a contractual right to receive a specified amount upon redemption. As a result, earnings are adjusted to reflect this in-substance distribution that is different from other common shareholders. In addition, the Company allocates net earnings to each class of common stock and participating security as if all of the net earnings for the period had been distributed. The Company's participating securities consist of time-based restricted unit awards that contain a non-forfeitable right to receive dividends and, therefore, are considered to participate in earnings with common shareholders. Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net earnings allocated to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net earnings allocable to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, as adjusted for the potential dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards. Additionally, as the deadline for the common shareholders' election was January 12, 2018, subsequent to December 31, 2017, the total Special Distribution of $783 million (approximately $15.92 per share) was included in the computation of the Company's diluted earnings (loss) per share.
Income Taxes: The Company makes certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments are applied in the calculation of tax credits, tax benefits and deductions, and in the calculation of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are adjusted to the extent necessary to reflect tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. Adjustments may be required to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities due to changes in tax laws and audit adjustments by tax authorities. To the extent adjustments are required in any given period, the adjustments would be included within the tax provision in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company records a liability for uncertain tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold. The Company did not have material uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from its state nonrefundable energy tax credit carryforward will not be realized.  Consequently, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $6.9 million on the deferred tax asset relating to this credit carryforward.  If our assumptions change and the Company determines that it will be able to realize the credit, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets will be recognized as a reduction in income tax expense. 
The Company accounts for tax credits related to its investments in KRS II and Waihonu using the flow-through method, which reduces the provision for income taxes in the year the tax credits first become available.
Comprehensive Income (Loss): Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity, except those resulting from transactions with shareholders and net income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) principally includes amortization of deferred pension and postretirement costs. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, were as follows for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 (in millions):

69



2017 20162019 2018
Unrealized components of benefit plans:      
Pension plans$(43.1) $(43.8)$(47.4) $(54.8)
Post-retirement plans(1.0) (0.6)0.2
 0.0
Non-qualified benefit plans(0.1) (0.6)(0.8) (0.4)
Interest rate swap1.9
 1.8
(0.8) 3.3
Accumulated other comprehensive loss$(42.3) $(43.2)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)$(48.8) $(51.9)
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) by component for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 were as follows (in millions, net of tax):
 Employee Benefit Plans Interest Rate Swap Total
Balance, January 1, 2017$(45.0) $1.8
 $(43.2)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of taxes of $1.2 and $0.2 for employee benefit plans and interest rate swap, respectively(2.0) (0.2) (2.2)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes of $1.8 and $0.2 for employee benefit plans and interest rate swap, respectively2.8
 0.3
 3.1
Balance, December 31, 2017$(44.2) $1.9
 $(42.3)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of taxes of $0(4.9) 1.0
 (3.9)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes of $03.4
 
 3.4
Impact of adoption of ASU 2018-02(9.5) 0.4
 (9.1)
Balance, December 31, 2018$(55.2) $3.3
 $(51.9)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of taxes of $05.3
 (4.0) 1.3
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes of $01.9
 (0.1) 1.8
Balance, December 31, 2019$(48.0) $(0.8) $(48.8)
 Employee
Benefit Plans
 Interest Rate Swap Total
Balance, January 1, 2015$(44.4) $
 $(44.4)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of taxes of $2.9 for employee benefit plans(4.6) 
 (4.6)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $2.3 for employee benefit plans3.7
 
 3.7
Balance, December 31, 2015$(45.3) $
 $(45.3)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of taxes of $2.1 and $1.0 for employee benefit plans and interest rate swap, respectively(3.4) 1.6
 (1.8)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $2.3 and $0.2 for employee benefit plans and interest rate swap, respectively3.7
 0.2
 3.9
Balance, December 31, 2016$(45.0) $1.8
 $(43.2)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of taxes of $1.2 and $0.2 for employee benefit plans and interest rate swap, respectively(2.0) (0.2) (2.2)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $1.8 and $0.2 for employee benefit plans and interest rate swap, respectively2.8
 0.3
 3.1
Balance, December 31, 2017$(44.2) $1.9
 $(42.3)



The reclassifications of other comprehensive lossincome (loss) components out of accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 were as follows (in millions):

2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Unrealized hedging gain (loss)$(0.4) $2.6
 $
Reclassification adjustment for interest expense included in net income or loss0.5
 0.4
 
Actuarial loss*(3.2) (4.6) (7.1)
Unrealized interest rate hedging gain (loss) $(4.0) $1.0
 $(0.4)
Actuarial loss 5.3
 (4.9) (3.2)
Impact of reclassification adjustment to interest expense included in Net Income (Loss) (0.1) 
 0.5
Amortization of defined benefit pension items reclassified to net periodic pension cost:           
Prior service cost
 
 (0.4)
Net loss*5.7
 7.5
 7.3
 4.0
 4.6
 4.3
Prior service credit*(1.1) (0.9) (1.3) (0.7) (0.7) (0.8)
Curtailment
 (1.5) 
Curtailment (gain)/loss* (1.4) (0.6) (0.3)
Settlement (gain)/loss* 
 0.1
 1.4
Total before income tax1.5
 3.5
 (1.5) 3.1
 (0.5) 1.5
Income taxes(0.6) (1.4) 0.6
 
 
 (0.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$0.9
 $2.1
 $(0.9) $3.1
 $(0.5) $0.9
* TheseThis accumulated other comprehensive loss components areincome (loss) component is included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 11 for additional details).

70




Self-Insured Liabilities: The Company is self-insuredRedeemable Non-controlling Interest: Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries that are redeemable for certain losses that include, butcash or other assets outside of the Company’s control at other than fair value are not limitedclassified as mezzanine equity, outside of equity and liabilities. Such amounts are adjusted at each reporting date to employee health, workers’ compensation, general liability, real and personal property, and real estate construction warranty and defect claims. When feasible, the Company obtains third-party insurance coverage to limit its exposure to these claims. When estimating its self-insured liabilities,higher of (1) the Company considers a numberamount resulting from the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for cumulative amounts of factors, including historical claims experience, demographic factors, and valuations provided by independent third-parties.
Interest and other income (expense), net is comprised primarily of interest income and other componentsthe non-controlling interest's share of net periodic benefit costs related to pensionincome or loss, share of other comprehensive income or loss and postretirement benefits.dividends and (2) the redemption value on each annual balance sheet date. The components of Interest and other income (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
Interest income$5.3
 $1.8
 $0.8
Pension and postretirement benefit expense(2.6) (4.2) (3.7)
Other income (expense)(0.6) 0.7
 0.4
Interest and other income (expense), net$2.1
 $(1.7) $(2.5)
New Accounting Pronouncements:
In May 2014, Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), (“ASU 2014-09”) which provides guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of non-financial assets. ASU 2014-09 will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. Under ASU 2014-09, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized including (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligationsresulting changes in the contract(s), (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligationscarrying value, increases or decreases, are recorded with corresponding adjustments against earnings surplus or, in the contract(s), and (v) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In addition, ASU 2014-09 requires disclosureabsence of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.earnings surplus, common stock.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, deferring the effective date of this standard. As a result, ASU 2014-09 and related amendments will be effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption is permitted, but not before August 1, 2017, the original effective date of ASU 2014-09.Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

In March, April, May, and December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal Versus Agent Consideration (Reporting Revenue Gross Versus Net), ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, and ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, and ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, respectively (collectively, the “Amendments”). The Amendments serve to clarify certain aspects of and have the same effective date as ASU 2014-09.

The Company has completed its evaluation of the impact of adopting ASU No. 2014-09 and has identified the major revenue streams. Based on the evaluation, the Company does not anticipate a significant impact on the financial statements, controls structure around the implementation, or notes in the consolidated financial statements.  Upon adoption at January 1, 2018, the Company will recognize an insignificant cumulative effect amount using the modified retrospective approach. 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUAccounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic(Topic 842) ("("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 requires the identification of arrangements thatThe guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 and should be accounted for as leases by lessees. In general, lease arrangements exceedingimplemented using a twelve month term must now be recognized as assets and liabilities onmodified retrospective approach, with the balance sheetoption to apply the guidance at the effective date or the beginning of the lessee. Under ASU 2016-02, a right-of-use assetearliest comparative period. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2019 and lease obligation will be recorded for all leases, whether operating or financing, whileelected to use the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization/interest expense for financing leases. The balance sheet amount recorded for existing leases ateffective date as the date of initial application. Consequently, financial information was not updated and the disclosures required under the new standard are not provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. Additionally, the Company elected the "package of practical expedients," which permits the Company to not reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs.
The new guidance did not have a material impact on the accounting treatment of the Company's triple-net tenant leases, which are the primary source of our CRE revenues. However, starting in the current year, there were certain changes to the guidance under ASC 842, which will have an impact on future operating results, including initial direct costs associated with the execution of lease agreements, such as legal fees and certain transaction costs, will no longer be capitalizable and instead are expensed in the period incurred.
The Company recorded ROU assets and corresponding lease liabilities of approximately $31.0 million on the consolidated balance sheet for certain leases in which it is the lessee. The adoption of ASC 842 had no impact on the Company's lease expense.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 must be calculated using the applicable incremental borrowing rate at the date of adoption. In addition, ASU 2016-02 requires the use of the modified retrospective

71



method, which will require adjustment2017-12, Targeted Improvements to all comparative periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. ASU 2016-02Accounting for Hedging Activities. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued forfiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) ("ASU 2016-15"). ASU 2016-15 is an update that addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice of cash receipts and cash payments presentation and classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2016-15 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash ("ASU 2016-18"). ASU 2016-18 will require entities to show the changes on the total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between these items on the statement of cash flows. The guidance will be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this guidance in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017, pursuant to which the Company applied the cash flow presentation requirements retrospectively to all periods presented.

The impact of adopting the above guidance for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:

 2016 2015
 Previously ReportedImpact of AdoptionCurrent Presentation Previously ReportedImpact of AdoptionCurrent Presentation
Cash Flows from Operating Activities$111.2
$
$111.2
 $129.1
$
$129.1
Cash Flows from Investing Activities$(25.6)$(7.6)$(33.2) $1.0
$17.4
$18.4
Cash Flows from Financing Activities$(84.7)$
$(84.7) $(131.6)$
$(131.6)
        
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash       
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash$0.9
$(7.6)$(6.7) $(1.5)$17.4
$15.9
Balance, beginning of period1.3
17.7
19.0
 2.8
0.3
3.1
Balance, end of period$2.2
$10.1
$12.3
 $1.3
$17.7
$19.0

The reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was:

 2017 2016 2015
Cash and Cash Equivalents$68.9
 $2.2
 $1.3
Restricted Cash34.3
 10.1
 17.7
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$103.2
 $12.3
 $19.0


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment ("ASU 2017-04"). The guidance simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by eliminating the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value (i.e., measure the charge based on today’s Step 1). The standard does not changeadopted the guidance on completing StepJanuary 1, of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. The Company elected to early adopt this guidance in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business ("ASU 2017-01"). ASU 2017-01 provides guidance regarding the definition of a business with the objective of providing guidance to assist entities with

72



evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. ASU 2017-01 should be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted. The new guidance will result in many real estate transactions being classified as an asset acquisition and transaction costs being capitalized. The Company elected to early adopt FASB ASU No. 2017-01 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost ("ASU 2017-07"). ASU 2017-07 provides that entities will present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item(s) as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. In addition, entities will present the other components of net periodic benefit cost separately from the line item(s) that includes the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income, if one is presented. These components will not be eligible for capitalization in assets. ASU 2017-07 is effective for fiscal years or interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this guidance in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017, and has recorded the other components of net periodic benefit costs within other expense, which is classified in Interest and other income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The service cost component of net periodic benefit cost is classified in Selling, general and administrative in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company applied the presentation requirement of ASU 2017-07 retrospectively to all periods presented. The impact of adopting the above guidance was as follows:

Accordingly, the Company also reclassified prior period amounts for the other components of net periodic benefit costs totaling $4.2 million and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively, from Selling, general and administrative to Interest and other income, net.

The impact of adopting the above guidance for the years ended December��31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 2016 2015
 Previously ReportedImpact of AdoptionCurrent Presentation Previously ReportedImpact of AdoptionCurrent Presentation
Selling, general and administrative$56.2
$(4.2)$52.0
 $55.3
$(3.7)$51.6
Interest and other income, net$2.5
$(4.2)$(1.7) $1.2
$(3.7)$(2.5)

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”). The guidance clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. Entities will apply the modification accounting guidance if the value, vesting conditions or classification of the award changes. The guidance also clarifies that a modification to an award could be significant and therefore require disclosure, even if modification accounting is not required. Therefore, an entity will have to make all of the disclosures about modifications that are required today, in addition to disclosing that compensation expense hasn’t changed, if that’s the case. The guidance is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The guidance will be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.2019. The guidance amends the hedge accounting model in ASC 815 to enable entities to better portray the economics of their risk management activities in the financial statements and enhance the transparency and understandability of hedge results. The amendments expand an entity’sentity's ability to hedge nonfinancial and financial risk components and reduce complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk. This ASU eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change inearnings effect of the fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.


In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2019. The guidance expands the scope of ASC 718 to include share-based payment transactions, with the exception of specific guidance related to the attribution of compensation cost. The guidance also clarifies that any share-based payment awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers should be evaluated under ASC 606. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740), which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact of the new standard to its financial statements and has elected to early adopt for the year ended December 31, 2019. Based on the Company's evaluation, there were no material impacts upon adoption.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at amortized cost. This ASU was further updated by ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, ASU No. 2019-05, Targeted Transition Relief and ASU 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. ASU 2016-13 and related updates amend prior guidance on the impairment of financial instruments and add an impairment model that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses with the recognition of an allowance based on an estimate of expected credit losses. ASU 2018-19 clarified that operating lease receivables are not within the scope of ASC 326 and are to remain governed by ASC 842. The provisions of ASU 2016-13, as amended in subsequently issued amendments, is effective as of January 1, 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The guidance amends and removes several disclosure requirements, including the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU also modifies some disclosure requirements and requires additional disclosures for changes in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements and requires the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period or fiscal year before the effective date. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, entities will apply the new guidance using a modified retrospective approach (i.e., with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the initial application date). The guidance provides transition relief to make it easier for entities to apply certain amendments to existing hedges (including fair value hedges) where the hedge documentation needs to

73



be modified. The presentation and disclosure requirements apply prospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In FebruaryAugust 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)2018-14, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The guidance permits entities to reclassify tax effects stranded inclarifies current disclosures and removes several disclosure requirements, including accumulated other comprehensive income as a resultexpected to be recognized over the next fiscal year and amount and timing of tax reformplan assets expected to retained earnings, giving entities the option to reclassify these amounts rather than require reclassification. The FASB also gave entities the option to apply the guidance retrospectively or in the period of adoption. When adopted, the standard requires all entities to make new disclosures, regardless of whether they elect to reclassify stranded amounts. Entities are required to disclose whether or not they elected to reclassify the tax effects relatedbe returned to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017employer. This ASU also requires additional disclosures as well as their policyexplanations for releasing income tax effects from accumulated OCI. The guidancesignificant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit plan obligation. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities are able to early adopt the guidance in any interim or annual period for which financial statements have not yet been issued and apply it either (1) in the period of adoption or (2) retrospectively to each period in which the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 related to items in accumulated OCI are recognized.2020. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. The guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). Accordingly, the amendments require an entity (customer) in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract to follow the guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as an asset related to the service contract and which costs to expense. The amendments also require the entity (customer) to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement, which includes reasonably certain renewals. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and the amendments (which can be applied either retrospectively or prospectively under the ASU) will be applied prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.
3.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
3.     RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Construction Contracts and Material Sales. The Company entered into contracts in the ordinary course of business, as a supplier, with affiliates that are members in entities in which the Company also is a member. Revenues earned from transactions


with affiliates totaled approximately $21.1were $10.5 million, $12.0$16.6 million, and $23.0$21.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016,respectively. Expenses recognized from transactions with affiliates were $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2015, respectively.less than $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Receivables from these affiliates were $2.9$0.2 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Amounts due to affiliates were $1.2 million and $0.6 million as of December 31, 20172019 and immaterial as of December 31, 2016. Amounts due to these affiliates were immaterial as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.2018, respectively.
Commercial Real Estate. The Company entered into contracts in the ordinary course of business, as a lessor of property, with unconsolidatedcertain affiliates in which the Company has an interest, as well as with certain entities that are partially owned by a former director of the Company. Revenues earned from these transactions were $1.3 million, $4.3 million and $5.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, $6.1respectively. Receivables from affiliates were less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Land Operations. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized $2.2 million, $1.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, related to revenue for services provided to certain unconsolidated investments in affiliates and interest earned on notes receivables from related parties. Receivables from affiliates were less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, and immaterial2018, the Company completed the acquisition of 5 commercial units at The Collection high-rise residential condominium project on Oahu from its joint venture partners for the year ended December 31, 2015. Receivables from these affiliates were immaterial as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.$6.9 million paid in cash.
Land Operations.During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded developer fee revenuesextended a five-year construction loan secured by a mortgage on real property to one of approximately $2.4 million related to management and administrative services provided to certain unconsolidated investments in affiliates. Developer fee revenues recorded for the years ended 2016 and 2015its joint ventures. Receivables from this affiliate were $4.6$13.1 million and $2.9$13.5 million, respectively. Receivables from these affiliates were immaterial as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016.
Consulting Agreement. In January 2016, the Company entered into a one-year consulting agreement with a former executive of its Grace subsidiary (who retired in December 2015) to provide services related to the operation of Grace, including assisting in leadership transition, operating performance and government and community affairs. The agreement was for $200,000 for the 2016 calendar year and terminated on December 31, 2016.2018, respectively.
4.DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
4.     DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In December 2016, the Company completed its final sugar harvest and ceased its sugar operations.
The historical results of operations have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements and prior periods have been recast.
The revenue, operating income (loss), gain on asset dispositions, income tax benefit (expense) benefit and after-tax effects of these transactions for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018 and 20152017 were as follows (in millions)millions, except per share amounts):

  2019 2018 2017
Sugar operations revenue $
 $
 $22.9
Sugar operations costs and expenses 
 
 22.5
Operating income (loss) from sugar operations 
 
 0.4
Sugar operations cessation costs (1.1) (0.6) (2.7)
Gain (loss) on asset dispositions (0.4) 
 6.0
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes (1.5) (0.6) 3.7
Income tax benefit (expense) 
 
 (1.3)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes $(1.5) $(0.6) $2.4
       
Basic earnings (loss) per share $(0.02) $(0.01) $0.05
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $(0.02) $(0.01) $0.04
74



 2017 2016 2015
Sugar operations revenue$22.9
 $98.4
 $97.7
Cost of sugar operations22.5
 87.5
 124.6
Operating income (loss) from sugar operations0.4
 10.9
 (26.9)
Sugar operations cessation costs(2.7) (77.6) (22.6)
Gain on asset dispositions6.0
 
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes3.7
 (66.7) (49.5)
Income tax (expense) benefit(1.3) 25.6
 19.8
Income (loss) from discontinued operations$2.4
 $(41.1) $(29.7)
      
Basic earnings (loss) per share$0.05
 $(0.84) $(0.61)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$0.04
 $(0.83) $(0.60)

There was no depreciation and amortization related to discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. Depreciation and amortization related to discontinued operations was $70.9 million and $12.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016,2019, 2018 and 2015, respectively.2017.
5.INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES
5.     INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES
The Company's investments in affiliates consist principally of equity investments in limited liability companies in which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these investments. Accordingly, the Company accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. The Company’s investments in affiliates totaled$401.7 $167.6 million and $390.8$171.4 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The amounts of the Company’s investment atas of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 that represent undistributed earnings of investments in affiliates were approximately$8.2 $9.2 million and $15.5$7.8 million, respectively. Dividends and distributions from unconsolidated affiliates totaled $12.4 million in 2019, $51.1 million in 2018 and $10.4 million in 2017, $71.6 million in 2016 and $72.2 million in 2015.2017.


Operating results include the Company's proportionate share of net income (loss) from its equity method investments. A summary of combined financial information related to the Company's equity method investments atas of December 31, is2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions):
2017 2016 2019 2018
Current assets$153.1
 $154.3
 $79.3
 $71.1
Non-current assets754.9
 727.8
 697.9
 755.8
Total assets$908.0
 $882.1
 $777.2
 $826.9
       
Current liabilities$52.5
 $65.8
 $27.1
 $26.8
Non-current liabilities192.8
 175.0
 109.0
 149.2
Total liabilities$245.3
 $240.8
 $136.1
 $176.0
A summary of the net income (loss) information related to the Company's equity method investments for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):
  2019 2018 2017
Revenues $191.9
 $243.6
 $200.5
Operating costs and expenses 173.0
 209.7
 166.3
Gross profit (loss) $18.9
 $33.9
 $34.2
Income (loss) from Continuing Operations* $6.6
 $17.4
 $16.0
Net Income (loss)* $6.6
 $16.5
 $15.5
* Includes earnings from equity method investments held by the investee.

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Revenues$200.5
 $489.3
 $471.7
Operating costs and expenses166.3
 449.8
 411.6
Operating income$34.2
 $39.5
 $60.1
Income from Continuing Operations*$16.0
 $31.7
 $57.2
Net Income*$15.5
 $31.7
 $56.1
* Includes earnings from equity method investments held by the investee.
In 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture with DMB Communities II, an affiliate of DMB Associates, Inc., an Arizona-based developer of master-planned communities (“DMB”), for the development of Kukui'ula, a master planned resort residential community located in Poipu, Kauai, planned for up to 1,500 high-end residential units. The carrying value of the

75



Company's investment in Kukui'ula,Kukui‘ula, which includes capital contributed by A&Bthe Company to the joint venture and the value of land initially contributed, net of joint venture earnings and losses and impairments, was $302.6$116.2 million and $115.4 million as of December 31, 20172019 and $290.7 million as of December 31, 2016.2018, respectively. The total capital contributed to the joint venture by the Company as a percent of total committed was approximately 61%62% as of December 31, 2017. Due to the joint venture’s obligation to complete improvements and amenities, the joint venture uses the percentage-of-completion method for revenue recognition.2019. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest in the joint venture, but exercises significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the venture and, therefore, accounts for its investment using the equity method. Due to the complex nature of cash distributions to the members, net income of the joint venture is allocated to the members, including the Company, using the Hypothetical Liquidation at Book Value (“HLBV”) method. Under the HLBV method, joint venture income or loss is allocated to the members based on the period change in each member’s claim on the book value of net assets of the venture, excluding capital contributions and distributions made during the period.
In 2010, A&B acquired fully-entitled land near the Ala Moana Center in Honolulu for the development of Waihonua ("Waihonua"), a 340-saleable unit residential high-rise condominium. In 2012, the Company formed a joint venture and contributed the land, pre-development assets and cash. The Company also secured capital partners that provided the remainder of the $65.0 million in total equity required for the project and the joint venture secured construction financing. In connection with the project, the Company provided a limited guaranty to the construction lender in the amount of the lesser of $20.0 million or the outstanding loan balance. The Company's exposure to loss was limited to its equity investment and the outstanding balance on the loan, up to $20.0 million. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest in the joint venture, but exercises significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the venture, and therefore, accounted for its investment under the equity method. Construction of Waihonua was completed in November 2014, and 12 units closed in December 2014. The remaining 328 units closed in January 2015 and the construction loan was paid off, extinguishing the guarantee. The Company had no carrying value related to its investment in Waihonua at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company determined that its Waihonua joint venture met the conditions of a significant subsidiary under Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X and, therefore, pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X, has attached separate financial statements to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1.
In July 2014, the Company invested $23.8 million in KRS II, an entity that owns and operates a 12-megawatt solar farm in Koloa, Kauai. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest in KRS II, but exercises significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the venture, and therefore, accounts for its investment under the equity method. Due to the complex nature of cash distributions, net income of the joint venture is allocated to the Company using the HLBV method. Under the HLBV method, joint venture income or loss is allocated to the members based on the period change in each member’s claim on the net assets of the venture, excluding capital contributions and distributions made during the period. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded a net, non-cash reduction of $0.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in Reduction in solar investments, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The carrying value of the Company's investment at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.9 million and $2.2 million. In connection with the KRS II investment, the Company provided a limited indemnity to Kauai Island Utility Cooperative ("KIUC") that indemnifies KIUC for payments up to $6.0 million made by KIUC under a KIUC guaranty to the lender that provided KRS II's project financing. KIUC is an equity partner and managing member of KRS II, project sponsor and customer for the output of the KRS II facility. The fair value of the Company's indemnity was not material.
During 2016, the Company also invested $15.4 million in Waihonu, an entity that operates two photovoltaic facilities with a combined capacity of 6.5 megawatts in Mililani, Oahu. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest in Waihonu, but exercises significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the venture, and therefore, accounts for its investment under the equity method. Due to the complex nature of cash distributions, net income of the joint venture is allocated to the Company using the HLBV method, as described in the above paragraph. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a net, non-cash reduction of $2.4 million in Reduction in solar investments, net. As of December 31, 2017, the Company's investment was $1.4 million.
In October 2014, the Company contributed land, pre-paid development assets and cash to The Collection LLC, a joint venture formed to develop a 464-unit high-rise residential condominium project on Oahu, consisting of a 396-saleable unit high-rise condominium tower, 14 three-bedroom townhomes, and a 54-unit mid-rise building. In addition to the Company's initial contribution, the Company also secured equity partners that contributed an additional $16.8 million in cash. The Company's total agreed upon contribution, which includes the land and pre-paid development assets already contributed, was $50.3 million. In connection with the project, the Company provided a limited guaranty to the construction lender for the project at the lesser of $30.0 million or the outstanding loan balance. The Company's exposure to loss is limited to its total equity investment and the outstanding balance on the loan, up to $30.0 million. The fair value of the Company's guaranty was not material. The Company's investment at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $18.5 million and $15.3 million, respectively. The Company accounts for its investment under the equity method. As of December 31, 2017, all 396 tower units and 54 loft

76



units and two townhomes have closed escrow. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company determined that The Collection joint venture met the conditions of a significant subsidiary under Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X and, therefore, pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X, has attached separate financial statements to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.4.
The Company also has investments in various other joint ventures that operate or develop real estate and joint ventures that engage in materials and construction-related activities and renewable energy. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest, but has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these joint ventures and, accordingly, accounts for its investments in these ventures using the equity method of accounting.
Impairment of Investments in Affiliates: When there is evidence that the fair value of the Company's investments in affiliates that are accounted for under the equity method may be below the carrying value, the Company must determine if such decline in value is other-than-temporary. In evaluating the fair value of an investment and whether any identified impairment is other-than-temporary, significant estimates and considerable judgments are involved. These estimates and judgments are based, in part, on the Company’s current and future evaluation of economic conditions in general, as well as a joint venture’s current and future plans. Additionally, these impairment calculations are highly subjective because they require management to make assumptions and apply judgments to estimates regarding the timing and amount of future cash flows that may consider various factors, including sales prices, development costs, market conditions and absorption rates, probabilities related to various cash flow scenarios, and appropriate discount rates based on the perceived risks, among others. In evaluating whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers all available information, including the length of time and extent of the impairment, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the affiliate, the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value, and projected industry and economic trends, among others. Changes in these and other assumptions could affect the projected operational results and fair value of the unconsolidated affiliates, and accordingly, may require valuation adjustments to the Company’s investments that may materially impact the Company’s financial condition or its future operating results.
Weakness in particular real estate markets, difficulty in obtaining or renewing project-level financing or development approvals, and changes in the Company’s development strategy, among other factors, may affect the value or feasibility of certain


development projects owned by the Company or by its joint ventures and could lead to additional impairment charges in the future. In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairments of investments in affiliates.
During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded impairments of investments in affiliates of $188.6 million. This amount was primarily driven by an impairment in its investment in Kukui‘ula. In 2018, the Company determined that its investment in Kukui‘ula was other-than-temporarily impaired as a result of changing its strategy and no longer intending to hold its investment through the duration of the project. As a result, the Company estimated the fair value of its investment in Kukui‘ula (using a discounted cash flow model) to be below its carrying value and recorded a non-cash, other-than-temporary impairment of $186.8 million. The Company classified the fair value measurement as Level 3. The weighted average discount rate used in the valuation was 18.0%.

6.UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS
6.     REVENUE AND CONTRACT BALANCES
The Company recognizes revenue when control of promised goods or services is transferred to the customer at an amount that reflects the consideration, which the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.
The Company disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers by revenue type, as the Company believes it best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of the Company's revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Revenue by type for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was as follows (in millions):
  2019 2018
Revenues:    
Commercial Real Estate $160.6
 $140.3
Land Operations:    
Development sales revenue 57.2
 54.3
Unimproved/other property sales revenue 32.4
 210.5
Other operating revenue 24.5
 24.7
Total Land Operations 114.1
 289.5
Materials & Construction 160.5
 214.6
Total revenues $435.2
 $644.4

The total amount of contract consideration allocated to either wholly unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations was $75.7 million and $128.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company expects to recognize approximately 70% to 80% of this contract consideration as revenue in 2020, with the remaining recognized thereafter.
Timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. Certain construction contracts include retainage provisions that are customary in the industry (i.e., are not for financing purposes) and are included in Contracts retention. The balances billed but not paid by customers pursuant to these provisions generally become due upon completion and acceptance of the project work or products by the customers. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts represent amounts earned and reimbursable under contracts, but have a conditional right for billing and payment, such as achievement of milestones or completion of the project. When events or conditions indicate that it is probable that the amounts outstanding become unbillable, the transaction price and associated contract asset is reduced. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are billings to customers on contracts in advance of work performed, including advance payments negotiated as a contract condition. Generally, unearned project-related costs will be earned over the next twelve months.


The following table provides information about receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
(in millions) 2019 2018
Accounts receivable, net $43.4
 $49.6
Contracts retention 8.6
 11.6
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts 10.0
 9.2
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts 7.9
 5.9
Variable consideration(1)
 62.0
 62.0
Other long term deferred revenue 5.6
 1.2

(1)Variable consideration recorded in connection with the Agricultural Land Sale. See Note 21.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized revenue of approximately $4.7 million related to the Company's contract liabilities reported as of December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized revenue of approximately $4.2 million related to the Company's contract liabilities reported as of December 31, 2017. The amount of revenue recognized from performance obligations satisfied in prior periods was not material.
Information related to uncompleted contracts as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 is as follows (in millions):
  2019 2018
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts $339.3
 $218.0
Estimated earnings 38.3
 30.3
Subtotal 377.6
 248.3
Billings to date (375.5) (245.0)
Total $2.1
 $3.3
 2017 2016
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts$137.5
 $92.2
Estimated earnings35.8
 26.8
Subtotal173.3
 119.0
Less: billings to date158.8
 106.1
Total$14.5
 $12.9
    
Included in accompanying balance sheet under the following captions:   
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts$20.2
 $16.4
Estimated billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts(5.7) (3.5)
Total$14.5
 $12.9


7.REAL ESTATE PROPERTY, NET
Property on the consolidated balance sheetsReal estate property, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 includes the following (in millions):
  2019 2018
Land $768.8
 $638.3
Buildings 692.4
 584.2
Other property improvements 79.0
 71.3
Subtotal 1,540.2
 1,293.8
Accumulated depreciation (127.5) (107.3)
Real estate property, net $1,412.7
 $1,186.5

 December 31,
 2017 2016
Buildings$471.6
 $566.5
Land613.3
 622.6
Machinery and equipment74.7
 254.0
Asphalt plants and quarry assets80.2
 78.2
Water, power and sewer systems109.9
 156.4
Other property improvements70.5
 65.9
Vessel
 11.3
   Subtotal1,420.2
 1,754.9
Accumulated depreciation(272.7) (523.3)
   Property - net$1,147.5
 $1,231.6
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $32.3 million, $106.1 million and $43.8 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2016, HC&S recorded accelerated depreciation of $70.9 million.


77





8.NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT
At8.     NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT
As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016, notes2018, Notes payable and long-termother debt consisted of the following (in millions):
 2017 2016
Revolving credit facilities:   
Wells Fargo GLP Revolver, matures in 2018 (a)$0.5
 $
Revolving credit facility, matures in 2022 ($372.2 million available) (b)66.0
 14.9
Term loans:   
6.38%, payable through 2017, secured by Midstate Hayes
 8.2
1.85%, payable through 2017, unsecured
 2.5
2.00%, payable through 2018, unsecured0.1
 0.8
3.31%, payable through 2018, unsecured1.0
 2.8
5.19%, payable through 2019, unsecured4.4
 6.5
6.90%, payable through 2020, unsecured48.8
 65.0
LIBOR plus 2.00%, payable through 2021 (c)
9.4
 9.4
LIBOR plus 1.00%, payable through 2021, secured by asphalt terminal (d)4.8
 6.1
3.15%, payable through 2021, second mortgage secured by Kailua Town Center III4.9
 
LIBOR plus 1.50%, payable through 2021, secured by Kailua Town Center III (e)10.8
 11.2
5.53%, payable through 2024, unsecured28.5
 28.5
3.90%, payable through 2024, unsecured62.6
 68.1
4.15%, payable through 2024, secured by Pearl Highlands Center87.0
 88.8
5.55%, payable through 2026, unsecured46.0
 46.0
5.56%, payable through 2026, unsecured25.0
 25.0
4.35%, payable through 2026, unsecured22.0
 22.0
4.04%, payable through 2026, unsecured50.0
 
3.88%, payable through 2027, unsecured50.0
 50.0
4.16%, payable through 2028, unsecured25.0
 
4.30%, payable through 2029, unsecured25.0
 
LIBOR plus 1.35%, payable through 2029, secured by Manoa Marketplace (f)60.0
 60.0
Total debt (contractual)631.8
 515.8
Unamortized debt premium (discount)0.5
 0.5
Unamortized debt issuance costs(1.1) (1.2)
Total debt (carrying value)631.2
 515.1
Less current portion(46.0) (42.4)
Long-term debt$585.2
 $472.7
      Principal Outstanding
Debt Interest Rate (%) Maturity Date December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Secured:        
Kailua Town Center (1) 2021 $10.2
 $10.5
Kailua Town Center #2 3.15% 2021 4.6
 4.7
Heavy Equipment Financing (2) (2) 3.6
 
Laulani Village 3.93% 2024 62.0
 62.0
Pearl Highlands 4.15% 2024 83.4
 85.3
Manoa Marketplace (3) 2029 59.5
 60.0
Subtotal     $223.3
 $222.5
Unsecured: 
 
 

 

Term Loan 3 5.19% 2019 
 2.3
Term Loan 4 (4) 2019 
 9.4
Series D Note 6.90% 2020 16.2
 32.5
Bank Syndicated Loan (5) 2023 50.0
 50.0
Series A Note 5.53% 2024 28.5
 28.5
Series J Note 4.66% 2025 10.0
 10.0
Series B Note 5.55% 2026 46.0
 46.0
Series C Note 5.56% 2026 23.0
 24.0
Series F Note 4.35% 2026 22.0
 22.0
Series H Note 4.04% 2026 50.0
 50.0
Series K Note 4.81% 2027 34.5
 34.5
Series G Note 3.88% 2027 35.0
 42.5
Series L Note 4.89% 2028 18.0
 18.0
Series I Note 4.16% 2028 25.0
 25.0
Term Loan 5 4.30% 2029 25.0
 25.0
Subtotal     $383.2
 $419.7
Revolving Credit Facilities: 
 
 

 

GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility (6) 2020 
 0.4
A&B Revolver (7) 2022 98.7
 136.6
Subtotal 
 
 98.7
 137.0
Total Debt (contractual) 
 
 $705.2
 $779.2
Unamortized debt premium (discount) 
 
 (0.1) (0.2)
Unamortized debt issuance costs 
 
 (0.5) (0.9)
Total debt (carrying value) 
 
 $704.6
 $778.1
(a)
(1) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.50%, but is swapped through maturity to a 5.95% fixed rate.
(2) Loans have stated rates ranging from 4.08% to 5.00% and stated maturity dates ranging from 2021 to 2023.
(3) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.35%, but is swapped through maturity to a 3.14% fixed rate.
(4) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.00%, and is secured by a letter of credit.
(5) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.60%, based on pricing grid.
(6) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%.
(7) Loan has a stated interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.65%, based on pricing grid.

The Company's notes payable and other debt is categorized between debt instruments secured by real estate improved properties or other assets ("Secured Debt"), unsecured notes payable and other term loans ("Unsecured Debt") and lines of credit and borrowings under revolving credit facilities ("Revolving Credit Facilities") which includes the existing revolving credit facility used for general Company purposes ("A&B Revolver") as well as a revolving credit facility related to one of the consolidated subsidiaries in the M&C segment (the "GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility").


Secured Debt
Kailua Town Center: On December 20, 2013, the Company consummated the acquisition of the Kailua Portfolio, a collection of retail assets on Oahu. In connection with the acquisition of the Kailua Portfolio, the Company assumed a $12.0 million mortgage note, which matures in September 2021, and an interest rate swap that effectively converts the floating rate debt to a fixed rate of 5.95% (see Note 15). As of December 31, 2019, the balance of the mortgage note was $10.2 million. The Company also secured a $5.0 million second mortgage on the Kailua Portfolio during the first quarter of 2017, which bears interest at 3.15% and matures in 2021. The second mortgage has an outstanding balance at December 31, 2019 of $4.6 million.
Heavy Equipment Financing: In connection with the M&C segment, the Company enters into leases for machinery related to its businesses that are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are further discussed in Note 9.
Laulani Village: In connection with asset acquisitions of commercial real estate improved properties made in the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company assumed a $62.0 million mortgage secured by Laulani Village that matures on May 1, 2024. The note bears interest at 3.93% and requires monthly interest payments of approximately $0.2 million until May 2020 and principal and interest payments of approximately $0.3 million thereafter.
Pearl Highlands: On September 17, 2013, the Company closed the purchase of Pearl Highlands Center, a 415,400-square-foot, fee simple retail center in Pearl City, Oahu (the “Property”), for $82.2 million in cash and the assumption of a $59.3 million mortgage loan, pursuant to the terms of the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 9, 2013, between PHSC Holdings, LLC and A&B Properties. On December 1, 2014, the Company refinanced and increased the amount of the loan secured by the Property. The new loan ("Refinanced Loan") was increased to $92.0 million and bears interest at 4.15%. The Refinanced Loan matures in December 2024, and requires monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $0.4 million. A final principal payment of approximately $73.0 million is due on December 8, 2024. The Refinanced Loan is secured by the Property under a Mortgage and Security Agreement between the Company and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.
Manoa Marketplace: In 2016, ABL Manoa Marketplace LF LLC, A&B Manoa LLC, ABL Manoa Marketplace LH LLC, and ABP Manoa Marketplace LH LLC (the "Borrowers"), wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, entered into a $60.0 million mortgage loan agreement ("Loan") with First Hawaiian Bank ("FHB"). The Loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%.
(b)1.35% and matures on August 1, 2029. The Loan hasrequires interest-only payments for the first 36 months and principal and interest payments for the remaining 120 months using a stated25-year amortization period. A final principal payment of $41.7 million is due on August 1, 2029. The Company had previously entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount equal to the principal amount on the debt to fix the variable interest rate on the related periodic interest payments at an effective rate of LIBOR plus 1.65%, based on pricing grid.
(c)3.14% (see Note 15). The Loan is secured by Manoa Marketplace under a Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between the Borrowers and FHB, dated August 1, 2016.
Assets Pledged as Collateral: The approximate book values of assets used in the Commercial Real Estate segment pledged as collateral under the foregoing credit agreements at December 31, 2019 was $374.5 million. The approximate book values of assets used in the Materials & Construction segment pledged as collateral under the foregoing credit agreements at December 31, 2019 was $3.8 million. There were 0 assets used in the Land Operations segment that were pledged as collateral.
Unsecured Debt
Term Loan 3: In connection with its M&C segment, Grace Pacific held a term loan with FHB which included interest at 5.19%. Outstanding amounts for Term Loan 3 were repaid in the year ended December 31, 2019; as of December 31, 2019, there is 0 outstanding balance of the Term Loan 3.
Term Loan 4: As part of a 2013 transaction where the Company obtained a controlling financial interest in Kukui‘ula Village LLC ("Village"), the Company consolidated the Village's assets and liabilities at fair value, which included a $9.4 million loan ("Term Loan 4") secured by a letter of credit. The Term Loan 4 was interest only and included interest at LIBOR plus 2.0%. Outstanding amounts for Term Loan 4 were repaid in the year ended December 31, 2019; as of December 31, 2019, there is 0 outstanding balance of the Term Loan 4.
(d) Loan hasPrudential Series Notes: In December 2015, the Company entered into an agreement (the "Prudential Agreement") with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, "Prudential") for an unsecured note purchase and private shelf facility that enabled the Company to issue notes in an aggregate amount up to $450.0 million, less the sum of all principal amounts then outstanding on any notes issued by the Company or any of its subsidiaries to Prudential and the amounts of any notes that are committed under the Prudential Agreement. The Prudential Agreement (which amended and renewed a statedthen-existing agreement) had an issuance period that ended in December 2018 and contained certain restrictive covenants for the notes issued under the Prudential Agreement that were substantially the same as the covenants contained in the Historical Revolving Credit


Facility (defined below). Borrowings under the uncommitted shelf facility bear interest at rates that were determined at the time of borrowing.
In September 2017, the Company entered into an amendment of the Prudential Agreement (the "Pru Amendment"), which amended certain covenants (see below). Additionally, the Pru Amendment included a provision for a contingent incremental interest rate increase of LIBOR plus 1.00%, but is swapped20 basis points on all outstanding notes that was based on the Company's ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value (as defined in the Pru Amendment) measured against the provision's allowed ratio 0.35 to 1.0 from the date of the amendment through maturity to a 5.98% fixed rate.
(e) Loan has a statedSeptember 30, 2018. If triggered, the contingent interest rate adjustment would continue until such time that the Company's ratio of LIBOR plus 1.50%, but is swapped through maturitydebt to total adjusted asset value declined to 0.35 to 1.0 or below (at which point the provision would have no further force or effect). In October 2018, the provision was triggered and interest rates for all Prudential Series Notes increased by 20 basis points. In March 2019, based on the Company's subsequent leverage-based ratio falling below the provision's threshold. the interest rates for all Prudential Series Notes returned to their originally stated amounts at the time of the borrowing.
Bank Syndicated Loan: In February 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo") and a 5.95% fixed rate.
(f) Loan has a stated interest ratesyndicate of LIBOR plus 1.35%, but is swapped through maturity to a 3.14% fixed rate.

Revolving Credit Facilities:The Company had a revolving senior credit facilityother financial institutions that provided for an aggregate $350 million, 5-year unsecured commitment ("Revolving Credit Facility"), with an uncommitted $100 million increase option. The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for a $100$50.0 million sub-limit for the issuance of standby and commercial letters of credit and an $80term loan facility ("Wells Fargo Term Facility" or "Bank Syndicated Loan"). The Company also drew $50.0 million sub-limit for swing line loans. Amounts drawn under the facilitiesWells Fargo Term Facility in February 2018 and used such term loan proceeds to repay amounts that were borrowed under the A&B Revolver. Borrowings under the Wells Fargo Term Facility bear interest at a stated rate, as defined, plus a margin that is determined using a leverage based on a pricing grid using the ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value, as defined. The agreement contains certain restrictive covenants, the most significant of which requires the maintenance of minimumgrid.

78



shareholders’ equity levels, minimum EBITDA to fixed charges ratio, maximum debt to total assets ratio, minimum unencumbered income-producing asset value to unencumbered debt ratio, and limitations on priority debt.
Term Loan 5: In December 2015, the Revolving Credit Facility was amended to extend the maturity date to December 2020.
In SeptemberNovember 2017, the Company entered into a Second Amendedrate lock commitment to draw $25.0 million under its Note Purchase and Restated CreditPrivate Shelf Agreement ("A&B Revolver") with Bank of America N.A.AIG Asset Management (U.S.), as administrative agent, First Hawaiian Bank,LLC. Under the commitment, the Company drew $25.0 million in December 2017. The note bears interest at 4.30% and other lenders party thereto, which amendedmatures on December 20, 2029. Interest only is paid semi-annually and restated its existing $350 million committed the principal balance is due at maturity.
Revolving Credit Facility. The A&B Revolver increased the total revolving commitments to $450 million, extended the term of theFacilities
GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility to September 15, 2022, amended certain covenants (see below), and reduced the interest rates and fees charged under the Revolving Credit Facility. All other terms of the Revolving Credit Facility remain substantially unchanged.
At December 31, 2017, $66.0 million was outstanding, $11.8 million in letters of credit had been issued against the Revolving Credit Facility, and $372.2 million was available.
Facility: At December 31, 2017, the Company had, at one of its subsidiaries, GLP, a $30.0 million line of credit that expireswith a maturity date in October 2018. As of December 31, 2017, $0.5 million was outstanding under the line of credit. No amounts were outstanding as of December 31, 2016. The credit line is collateralized by the subsidiary's accounts receivable, inventory and equipment and may only be used for asphalt purchase. The Company and the noncontrolling interest holders are guarantors, on a several basis, for their pro rata shares (based on membership interests) of borrowings under the line of credit. In September 2018, GLP entered into a Third Amended Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo, which amended and extended its existing $30.0 million committed revolving credit facility ("GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility"). The GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility maturity was extended to October 5, 2020. Additionally, the interest rate was reduced by 25 basis points and a fee of 20 basis points on the unused amount of the GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility has been added. All other terms of the GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility remain substantially unchanged. As of December 31, 2019, there is 0 outstanding balance on the GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility.
Unsecured Term Loans: The GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants. Based on its net income after taxes in the year ended December 31, 2019, GLP was not in compliance with all of the covenants and received waivers on such requirements. As noted above, as of December 31, 2019, there is 0 outstanding balance on the GLP Asphalt Revolving Credit Facility.
A&B Revolver: The Company had a revolving senior credit facility that provided for an aggregate $350.0 million, five-year unsecured commitment (the "Historical Revolving Credit Facility"), with an uncommitted $100.0 million increase option. The Historical Revolving Credit Facility also provided for a $100.0 million sub-limit for the issuance of standby and commercial letters of credit and an $80.0 million sub-limit for swing line loans. Amounts drawn under the facilities would bear interest at a stated rate, as defined, plus a margin that is determined based on a pricing grid using the ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value, as defined. The agreement contained certain restrictive covenants, the most significant of which requires the maintenance of minimum shareholders’ equity levels, minimum EBITDA to fixed charges ratio, maximum debt to total assets ratio, minimum unencumbered income-producing asset value to unencumbered debt ratio, and limitations on priority debt, as defined in the agreement. In December 2015, the Company entered into an agreement (the "Prudential Agreement") with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, "Prudential") for an unsecured note purchase and private shelf facility that enables the Company to issue notes in an aggregate amount up to $450.0 million (“Prudential Shelf Facility”), less the sum of all principal amounts then outstanding on any notes issued by the Company or any of its subsidiaries to Prudential and the amounts of any notes that are committed under the Prudential Agreement. The Prudential Agreement, as amended, expires in December 2018 and contains certain restrictive covenants that are substantially the same as the covenants contained in theHistorical Revolving Credit Facility as amended. Borrowings underwas amended to extend the uncommitted shelf facility bear interest at rates that are determined at the time of the borrowing.maturity date to December 2020.
In September 2017, the Company entered into an amendment (the "Pru Amendment") of itsa Second Amended and Restated Note PurchaseCredit Agreement ("A&B Revolver") with Bank of America N.A., as administrative agent, First Hawaiian Bank, and Private Shelf Agreement, dated asother lenders party thereto, which amended and restated the existing $350.0 million commitment under the Historical Revolving Credit Facility. The A&B Revolver increased the total revolving commitments to $450.0 million, extended the term of December 10, 2015, whichthe facilities to September 15, 2022, amended certain covenants (see below). Additionally,, and reduced the Pru Amendment included a provision for a contingent incremental interest rate increaserates and fees charged under the Historical Revolving Credit Facility. All other terms under the Historical Revolving Credit Facility remained substantially unchanged.


At December 31, 2019, the Company had $98.7 million of 20 basis points on allrevolving credit borrowings outstanding, notes unless, following$1.7 million in letters of credit had been issued against the Company's planned earningsfacility, and profits purge, the maximum ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value is equal to or less than 0.35 to 1.00 with respect to any fiscal quarter ending on or before September 30, 2018. The contingent interest rate adjustment, if triggered, will continue until such time that the Company's ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value declines to 0.35 to 1.00 or below. If the contingent interest rate adjustment is not triggered on September 30, 2018, or if triggered, but subsequently the Company's ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value declines to 0.35 to 1.00 or below, the contingent interest rate adjustment shall have no further force or effect.$349.6 million remained available.
Changes toCovenants under A&B Revolver Amendment and Pru Amendment Covenants(Subsequent to Amendments)
The principal amendments under the A&B Revolver and the Pru Amendment are as follows:
An increase in the maximum ratio of debt to total adjusted asset value from 0.50:0.5:1.0 to 0.60:0.6:1.0.
An increase in the aggregate maximum amount of priority debt at any time from 20 percent20% to 25 percent.25%.
Allows the Company to consummate the holding company merger to adopt certain governance changes and facilitate the Company's ongoing compliance with REIT requirements.
Sets the minimum shareholders' equity amount to be $850.6 million plus 75 percent75% of the net proceeds received from equity issuances, less non-recurring costs related to the REIT conversion, among other additions and subtractions.
Allows for the payment of minimum dividends required to maintain REIT status and other dividends in any amount so long as no event of default shall then exist or would exist after giving effect to such dividends.

As a result of the Special Distributionspecial distribution that was declared on November 16, 2017 and settled on January 23, 2018 related to the Company's REIT conversion, the Company received waivers related to the impact of the Special Distribution on the minimum shareholder’s equity computation for its Revolving Credit Facilitythe A&B Revolver and its unsecured term loan agreements.
Debt Maturities


79



On October 10, 2017, the Company entered into a rate lock commitment to draw $50 million under its Prudential Shelf Facility, pursuant to which the Company drew $50 million on November 21, 2017. The note bears interest at 4.04 percent and matures on November 21, 2026. Interest only is paid semi-annually and the principal balance is due at maturity.
On October 30, 2017, the Company entered into a second rate lock commitment to draw $25 million under its Prudential Shelf Facility, pursuant to which the Company drew $25 million on December 8, 2017. The note bears interest at 4.16 percent and matures on December 8, 2028. Interest only is paid semi-annually and the principal balance is due at maturity.

On November 30, 2017, the Company entered into a rate lock commitment to draw $25 million under its Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement with AIG Asset Management (U.S.), LLC ("AMG"). Under the commitment, the Company drew $25 million on December 20, 2017. The note bears interest at 4.30 percent and matures on December 20, 2029. Interest only is paid semi-annually and the principal balance is due at maturity.

Real EstateSecured Term Debt:On December 20, 2013, the Company consummated the acquisition of the Kailua Portfolio, a collection of retail assets on Oahu. In connection with the acquisition of the Kailua Portfolio, the Company assumed a $12.0 million mortgage note, which matures in September 2021, and an interest rate swap that effectively converts the floating rate debt to a fixed rate of 5.95 percent. As of December 31, 2017, the balance of the mortgage note was $10.8 million. The Company also secured a $5.0 million second mortgage on the Kailua Portfolio during the first quarter of 2017, which bears interest at 3.15 percent and matures in 2021. The second mortgage has an outstanding balance as of December 31, 2017 of $4.9 million.
On September 24, 2013, KDC LLC ("KDC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of A&B and a 50 percent member of Kukui'ula Village LLC ("Village"), entered into an Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Kukui'ula Village ("Agreement") with DMB Kukui'ula Village LLC ("DMB)", a Delaware limited liability company, as a member, and KKV Management LLC, a Hawai`i limited liability company, as the manager and a member. Village owns and operates The Shops at Kukui'ula, a commercial retail center on the south shore of Kauai. Under the Agreement KDC assumed control of Village. Accordingly, A&B consolidated Village's assets and liabilities at fair value, which included secured loans totaling approximately $51.2 million. The first loan, totaling $41.8 million ("Real Estate Loan"), was secured by The Shops at Kukui'ula and 45 acres owned by Kukui'ula Development Company (Hawai`i), LLC ("Kukui'ula"), in which KDC is a member. The second loan, totaling $9.4 million, ("Term Loan") was secured by a letter of credit. On November 5, 2013, the Company refinanced the outstanding balances of the Real Estate Loan and Term Loan related to The Shops at Kukui'ula and extended the maturities of each by 3-years. The Real Estate Loan outstanding of $34.6 million, incurred interest at LIBOR plus 2.85 percent and required principal amortization of $0.9 million per quarter. During 2016, the outstanding balance of the Real Estate Loan was paid in full and extinguished. The Term Loan of $9.4 million, is interest only, secured by a letter of credit, and bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0 percent. At December 31, 2017, the outstanding balance of the Term Loan was $9.4 million.
On September 17, 2013, the Company closed the purchase of Pearl Highlands Center, a 415,400-square-foot, fee simple retail center in Pearl City, Oahu (the “Property”), for $82.2 million in cash and the assumption of a $59.3 million mortgage loan (the “Pearl Loan”), pursuant to the terms of the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 9, 2013, between PHSC Holdings, LLC and A&B Properties. On December 1, 2014, the Company refinanced and increased the amount of the loan secured by the Property. The new loan ("Refinanced Loan") was increased to $92.0 million and bears interest at 4.15 percent. The Refinanced Loan matures in December 2024, and requires monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $0.4 million. A final principal payment of approximately $73.0 million is due on December 8, 2024. The Refinanced Loan is secured by the Property under a Mortgage and Security Agreement between the Company and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.
In 2016, ABL Manoa Marketplace LF LLC, A&B Manoa LLC, ABL Manoa Marketplace LH LLC, and ABP Manoa Marketplace LH LLC (the "Borrowers"), wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, entered into a $60 million mortgage loan agreement ("Loan") with First Hawaiian Bank ("FHB"). The Loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35 percent and matures on August 1, 2029. The Loan requires interest-only payments for the first 36 months and principal and interest payments for the remaining 120 months term using a 25 years amortization period. A final principal payment of $41.7 million is due on August 1, 2029. The Company had previously entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $60 million to fix the variable interest rate on the Company's debt at an effective rate of 3.135 percent (see Note 15). The Loan is secured by Manoa Marketplace under a Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between the Borrowers and FHB, dated August 1, 2016.
The approximate book values of assets used in the Commercial Real Estate segment pledged as collateral under the foregoing credit agreements at December 31, 2017 was $233.0 million. The approximate book values of assets used in the

80



Materials & Construction segment pledged as collateral under the foregoing credit agreements at December 31, 2017 was $25.9 million. There were no assets used in the Land Operations segment that were pledged as collateral.
Debt Maturities:At December 31, 2017,2019, debt maturities during the next five years and thereafter, excluding amortization of debt discount or premium, are $41.8 million in 2018, $41.2 million in 2019, $39.7$30.9 million in 2020, $60.4$43.3 million forin 2021, $106.4$128.5 million in 2022, $84.3 million for 2023, $157.0 million in 2024, and $342.3$261.2 million thereafter.
9.LEASES - THE COMPANY AS LESSEE
Principal non-cancelable operating leases include land, office space, harbors and equipment leased for periodsthat have lease terms that expire through 2043. Management expects that in the normal course of business, most operating leases will be renewed or replaced by other similar leases. Rental expenseThe Company has equipment under operatingfinance leases totaled $6.1 million, $6.8 million, and $7.2 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Rentalwith lease terms that expire through 2023.
Lease expense for operating leases that provide for future escalations are accounted for on a straight-line basis. For the year ended December 31, 2019, lease expense under operating and finance leases was as follows (in millions):
  2019
Operating lease cost $5.1
Finance lease cost:  
Amortization of right-of-use assets 0.6
Interest on lease liabilities 0.1
Total lease cost $5.8

Short-term lease cost and variable lease cost were $0.7 million, $0.5 million, respectively, in the year ended December 31, 2019. Sublease income was $0.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2019.
Lease expense for operating leases totaled $6.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2019 was as follows:
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) - operating leases9.3
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) - finance leases3.3
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases4.4%
Weighted-average discount rate - finance leases3.1%



Supplemental cash flow information related to operating and finance leases for the year ended December 31, 2019 was as follows (in millions):
  2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:  
Operating cash outflows from operating leases $5.3
Operating cash outflows from financing leases $0.1
Financing cash flows from finance leases $0.6

Future minimumlease payments under non-cancelable operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2019 were as follows (in millions):
  Operating Leases Finance Leases
2020 $4.6
 $1.2
2021 4.5
 1.1
2022 4.5
 0.8
2023 3.3
 0.5
2024 2.6
 
Thereafter 8.9
 
Total lease payments 28.4
 3.6
Less: Interest (6.8) (0.1)
Total lease liabilities $21.6
 $3.5

Lease liabilities for operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2019 are presented in the table above. ROU assets for operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2019 were $21.8 million and $3.8 million, respectively.
Future lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2018 were as follows (in millions):
 Minimum Lease Payments December 31, 2018
2018 $5.5
2019 5.1
 $5.5
2020 5.1
 5.4
2021 5.1
 5.3
2022 3.7
 5.3
2023 4.5
Thereafter 17.9
 13.9
Total $42.4
 $39.9

10.LEASES - THE COMPANY AS LESSOR
The Company leases real estate property to third-parties land and buildingstenants under operating leases. The historical cost of, and accumulated depreciation on, leased property atas of December 31, 20172019 and 2016 were2018 was as follows (in millions):
 2019 2018
Leased property - real estate$1,511.3
 $1,263.0
Less accumulated depreciation(125.0) (104.4)
Property under operating leases - net$1,386.3
 $1,158.6

 2017 2016
Leased property - real estate$1,089.0
 $1,149.0
Less accumulated depreciation(104.0) (120.4)
Property under operating leases - net$985.0
 $1,028.6


Total rental income excluding tenant reimbursements (which totaled $33.0 million, $31.8 million and $30.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively), under these operating leases were as follows (in millions):
 2019
Fixed lease payments$111.2
Variable lease payments51.8
Total$163.0


2017 2016 2015
Minimum rentals$95.4
 $95.2
 $96.2
Contingent rentals (based on sales volume)4.4
 5.4
 4.8
Total$99.8
 $100.6
 $101.0

81



Contingent rentals amounted to $4.7 million and $4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Future minimum rentals on non-cancelable operating leases atas of December 31, 20172019 were as follows (in millions):
2020$117.5
2021105.0
202292.8
202382.5
202470.5
Thereafter510.2
Total lease receivables$978.5

 Operating Leases
2018$84.6
201976.1
202065.3
202151.6
202242.2
Thereafter279.7
Total$599.5
Future minimum rentals on non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2018 were as follows (in millions):

 Operating Leases
2019$97.6
202096.2
202178.2
202269.3
202359.9
Thereafter407.8
Total$809.0

11.EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
11.     EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has funded single-employer defined benefit pension plans that cover substantially all non-bargaining unit employees and certain bargaining unit employees. In addition, the Company has plans that provide certain retiree health care and life insurance benefits to substantially all salaried toand certain hourly employees. Employees are generally eligible for such benefits upon retirement and completion of a specified number of years of credited service. The Company does not pre-fund these health care and life insurance benefits and has the right to modify or terminate certain of these plans in the future. Certain groups of retirees pay a portion of the benefit costs.
Plan Administration, Investments and Asset Allocations: TheAs the plan sponsor for its defined benefit pension plan, the Company has an Investment Committee that is responsible for the investment and management of the pension plan assets. In 2013,The Company manages the Company changed its pension plan investment and management approach toassets based upon a liability-driven investment strategy, which seeks to increase the correlation of the pension plan assets and liabilities to reduce the volatility of the plan's funded status and, over time, improve the funded status of the plan. The adoption of this strategy has resulted in anAs a result, the asset allocation thatof the defined benefit pension plan is weighted more toward fixed income investments, which reduces investment volatility, but also reduces investment returns over time. In connection with the adoption of a liability-driven investment strategy, the Company appointed an investment adviser that directs investments and selects investment options, based on guidelines established by the Investment Committee.guidelines.
The Company’s investment strategy for its pension plan assets is to achieve a diversified mix of investments that balances long-term growth with an acceptable level of risk. The mix of assets includes a fixed income allocation that increases as the plan's funded status improves. The Company’s weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and 20172019 year-end target allocation, by asset category, were as follows:
  Target 2019 2018
Fixed income securities 100% 99% 99%
Cash and cash equivalents % 1% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100%

 Target 2017 2016
Domestic equity securities% % 31%
International equity securities% % 20%
Fixed income securities99% 98% 35%
Other% % 9%
Cash and cash equivalents1% 2% 5%
Total100% 100% 100%

The Company’s investments in equity securities primarily include domestic large-cap and mid-cap companies, but also include an allocation to small-cap and international equity securities. Equity investments do not include any direct holdings of the Company’s stock but may include such holdings to the extent that the stock is included as part of certain mutual fund or ETF holdings. Debt
Fixed income debt securities include investment-grade corporate bonds from diversified industries and U.S. Treasuries. Other types of investments include funds that invest in commercial real estate assets, and to a lesser extent, private equity investments in technology companies.
The expected return on plan assets assumption (6.8 percent(4.30% for 2017)2019) is principally based on the long-term outlook for various asset class returns, asset mix, the historical performance of the plan assets under the liability-driven investment strategy, and a comparison of the estimated long-term return calculated to the distribution of assumptions adopted by other plans with similar asset mixes. For the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the return on plan assets was 3.90%experienced a positive return of 18.08% and 2.64

82



percent,a negative return of 5.10%, respectively. Over the long-term, the actual returns have generally exceeded the benchmark returns used by the Company to evaluate performance of its fund managers.
The Company’s pension plan assets are held in a master trust and stated at estimated fair value, which is based on the fair values of the underlying investments. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade-date basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Equity Securities: Domestic and international common stocks are valued by obtaining quoted prices on recognized and highly liquid exchanges.
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETF): ETFs are valued by obtaining quoted prices on recognized and highly liquid exchanges.
Fixed Income Securities: Corporate bonds and U.S. government treasury and agency securities are valued based upon the closing price reported in the market in which the security is traded. U.S. government agency, corporate asset-backed securities, and mortgage securities may utilize models, such as a matrix pricing model, that incorporate other observable inputs such as cash flow, security structure, or market information, when broker/dealer quotes are not available.
Private Equity Fund and Insurance Contract Interests: The fair value of underlying investments in private equity assets is determined based on one or more valuation techniques, such as the market or income valuation approach, utilizing information provided by the general partner and taking into consideration the purchase price of the underlying securities, developments concerning the investee company subsequent to the acquisition of the investment, financial data and projections of the investee company provided to the general partner, illiquidity and non-transferability, and such other factors as the general partner deems relevant. Insurance contract interests consist of investments in group annuity contracts, which are valued based on the present value of expected future payments.
The fair values of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan assets at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, by asset category, are as follows (in millions):
Fair Value Measurements as of Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2017 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) 
Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Asset Category                 
Cash and cash equivalents$4.5
 $4.5
 $
 $1.2
 $1.2
 $
 $1.4
 $1.4
 $
Fixed income securities:     
Fixed income securities            
U.S. Treasury obligations81.2
 81.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Domestic corporate bonds and notes102.3
 
 102.3
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign corporate bonds9.6
 
 9.6
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets measured at NAV 189.3
 
 
 172.2
 
 
Total$197.6
 $85.7
 $111.9
 $190.5
 $1.2
 $
 $173.6
 $1.4
 $

83



 Fair Value Measurements as of
 December 31, 2016
 Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Asset Category       
Cash and Cash equivalents$6.1
 $6.1
 $
 $
Equity securities:       
Domestic28.1
 28.1
 
 
Domestic exchange-traded funds16.9
 16.9
 
 
International24.5
 24.5
 
 
International and emerging markets exchange-traded funds4.1
 4.1
 
 
Fixed income securities:       
U.S. Treasury obligations21.7
 21.7
 
 
Domestic corporate bonds and notes26.6
 
 26.6
 
Foreign corporate bonds1.5
 
 1.5
 
Other types of investments:       
Limited partnership interest in private equity fund0.1
 
 
 0.1
Exchange-traded global real estate securities9.9
 9.9
 
 
Insurance contracts0.1
 
 
 0.1
Exchange-traded commodity fund2.9
 2.9
 
 
Other receivables0.6
 0.6
 
 
Total$143.1
 $114.8
 $28.1
 $0.2
The table below presents a reconciliation of all pension plan investmentsInvestments in funds that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share practical expedient in accordance with ASC 820 have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy tables above. The NAV is based on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2017fair value of the underlying assets owned by the fund and 2016 (in millions):
 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant
 Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 Private Equity Insurance Total
Beginning balance, January 1, 2016$0.2
 $0.2
 $0.4
Actual return on plan assets:     
Assets held at the reporting date(0.1) (0.1) (0.2)
Ending balance, December 31, 20160.1
 0.1
 0.2
Actual return on plan assets:     
Assets held at the reporting date(0.1) (0.1) (0.2)
Ending balance, December 31, 2017$
 $
 $
is determined by the investment manager or custodian of the fund. The fair value amounts presented are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the fair value of plan assets. These investments primarily include other fixed income investments and securities.
Contributions are determined annually for each plan by the Company’s pension Administrative Committee, based upon the actuarially determined minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, the Pension Protection Act of 2006, and the maximum deductible contribution allowed for tax purposes. In 2017, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company made 0 contributions to its defined benefit pension plans. In 2017, the Company contributed approximately $49.2 million $0.5 million, and $2.6 million, respectively, to its defined benefit pension plans. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute cash to its pension plans so that it meets at least the minimum contribution requirements.
For the plans covering employees who are members of collective bargaining units, the benefit formulas are determined according to the collective bargaining agreements, either using career average pay as the base or a flat dollar amount per year of service.
In 2007, the Company changed the traditional defined benefit pension plan formula for new non-bargaining unit employees hired after January 1, 2008 and, replaced it with a cash balance defined benefit pension plan formula. Subsequently, effective January 1, 2012, the Company changed the benefits under its traditional defined benefit plans for non-bargaining unit

84



employees hired before January 1, 2008 and, replaced the benefit with the same cash balance defined benefit pension plan formula provided to those employees hired after January 1, 2008. Retirement benefits under the cash balance pension plan formula are based on a fixed percentage of eligible compensation, plus interest. The plan interest credit rate will vary from year-to-year based on the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company amended the cash balance pension plan such that, effective January 1, 2020, benefit accruals under the cash balance formula would cease and would be replaced with a non-elective contribution by the Company into a defined contribution plan. All accumulated benefits under the traditional defined


benefit pension plan and the cash balance pension plan will remain credited to employees' accounts under the amendments made in 2019.
Benefit Plan Assets and Obligations: The measurement date for the Company’s benefit plan disclosures is December 31 of each year. The status of the funded defined benefit pension plan and the unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit plans at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 and are shown below (in millions):
  Pension Benefits Other Post-retirement Benefits Non-qualified Plan Benefits
  2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Change in Benefit Obligation            
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $189.6
 $206.1
 $10.6
 $12.3
 $2.7
 $3.4
Service cost 2.3
 1.8
 0.1
 0.1
 0.1
 0.1
Interest cost 8.0
 7.4
 0.4
 0.4
 0.1
 0.1
Plan participants’ contributions 
 
 0.8
 0.8
 
 
Actuarial (gain) loss 19.0
 (11.8) (0.3) (1.4) 0.2
 (0.2)
Benefits paid (14.5) (13.9) (1.5) (1.6) (0.3) (0.1)
Settlement 
 
 
 
 
 (0.6)
Benefit obligation at end of year $204.4
 $189.6
 $10.1
 $10.6
 $2.8
 $2.7
             
Change in Plan Assets            
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $173.6
 $197.6
 $
 $
 $
 $
Actual return on plan assets 31.4
 (10.1) 
 
 
 
Employer contributions 
 
 0.8
 0.8
 0.3
 0.7
Participant contributions 
 
 0.7
 0.8
 
 
Benefits paid (14.5) (13.9) (1.5) (1.6) (0.3) (0.1)
Settlement 
 
 
 
 
 (0.6)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $190.5
 $173.6
 $
 $
 $
 $
             
Funded Status and Recognized Liability1
 $(13.9) $(16.0) $(10.1) $(10.6) $(2.8) $(2.7)

 Pension Benefits Other Post-retirement Benefits
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Change in Benefit Obligation       
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$197.0
 $194.6
 $11.9
 $12.2
Service cost2.8
 3.1
 0.1
 0.1
Interest cost8.0
 8.5
 0.4
 0.5
Plan participants’ contributions
 
 1.0
 1.1
Actuarial (gain) loss12.3
 4.7
 0.7
 
Benefits paid(14.0) (13.0) (1.8) (2.1)
Curtailment
 (0.9) 
 0.1
Benefit obligation at end of year$206.1
 $197.0
 $12.3
 $11.9
Change in Plan Assets       
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$143.1
 $146.2
 $
 $
Actual return on plan assets19.3
 9.4
 
 
Employer contributions49.2
 0.5
 0.8
 0.9
Participant contributions
 
 1.0
 1.1
Benefits paid(14.0) (13.0) (1.8) (2.1)
Other
 
 

 0.1
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$197.6
 $143.1
 $
 $
        
Funded Status and Recognized Liability$(8.5) $(53.9) $(12.3) $(11.9)
1 Presented as Accrued pension and post-retirement benefits as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
The accumulated benefit obligation for the Company’s qualified pension plans was $204.5$204.4 million and $197.0$189.6 million as ofat December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Amounts recognized on the consolidated balance sheets and in accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 were as follows (in millions):
  Pension Benefits Other Post-retirement Benefits Non-qualified Plan Benefits
  2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Net loss (gain) (net of taxes) $47.4
 $56.2
 $(0.2) $
 $0.8
 $0.5
Unrecognized prior service credit (net of taxes) 
 (1.4) 
 
 
 (0.1)
Total $47.4
 $54.8
 $(0.2) $
 $0.8
 $0.4
 Pension Benefits Other Post-retirement Benefits
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Non-current assets$
 $
 $
 $
Current liabilities
 
 (0.8) (1.0)
Non-current liabilities(8.5) (53.9) (11.5) (10.9)
Total$(8.5) $(53.9) $(12.3) $(11.9)
        
Net loss (gain) (net of taxes)$44.6
 $45.6
 $1.0
 $0.6
Unrecognized prior service credit (net of taxes)(1.5) (1.8) 
 
Total$43.1
 $43.8
 $1.0
 $0.6

The information for qualified pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 20172019 and 2016 is2018 are shown below (in millions):

  2019 2018
Projected benefit obligation $204.4
 $189.6
Accumulated benefit obligation $204.4
 $189.6
Fair value of plan assets $190.5
 $173.6
85



 2017 2016
Projected benefit obligation$206.1
 $197.0
Accumulated benefit obligation$206.0
 $197.0
Fair value of plan assets$197.6
 $143.1

The estimated prior service credit for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) into net periodic benefit cost in 20182020 is $0.5 million.negligible. The estimated net loss that will be recognized in net periodic pension cost for the defined benefit pension plans in 20182020 is $3.8$2.4 million. The estimated net loss for the other defined benefit post-retirement plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) into net periodic pension cost in 20182020 is $0.3 million.negligible. The estimated prior service cost for the other defined benefit post-retirement plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) into net periodic pension cost in 20182020 is negligible.


Unrecognized gains and losses of the post-retirement benefit plans are amortized over 5 years. Although current health costs are expected to increase, the Company attempts to mitigate these increases by maintaining caps on certain of its benefit plans, using lower cost health care plan options where possible, requiring that certain groups of employees pay a portion of their benefit costs, self-insuring for certain insurance plans, encouraging wellness programs for employees, and implementing measures to mitigate future benefit cost increases.
Components of the net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for the defined benefit pension plans and the post-retirement health care and life insurance benefit plans during 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, are shown below (in millions):
  Pension Benefits Post-retirement Benefits Non-qualified Plan Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Service cost $(2.3) $(1.8) $(2.8) $(0.1) $(0.1) $(0.1) $(0.1) $(0.1) $(0.1)
Interest cost (8.0) (7.4) (8.0) (0.4) (0.4) (0.4) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2)
Expected return on plan assets 7.3
 8.2
 9.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of net loss (4.1) (4.2) (4.1) 0.1
 (0.3) 
 
 (0.1) (0.2)
Amortization of prior service cost 0.6
 0.5
 0.5
 
 
 
 0.1
 0.2
 0.3
Curtailment gain (loss) 1.3
 
 
 
 
 
 0.1
 0.6
 0.3
Settlement gain (loss) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (0.1) (1.4)
Net periodic benefit cost $(5.2) $(4.7) $(5.0) $(0.4) $(0.8) $(0.5) $
 $0.4
 $(1.3)
                   
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)                  
Net gain (loss) $5.2
 $(6.5) $(2.4) $0.3
 $1.4
 $(0.7) $(0.2) $0.2
 $(0.1)
Amortization of net loss1
 4.1
 4.2
 4.1
 (0.1) 0.3
 
 
 0.1
 0.2
Amortization of prior service credit1
 (0.6) (0.5) (0.5) 
 
 
 (0.1) (0.2) (0.3)
Curtailment gain recognition of prior service credit1
 (1.3) 
 
 
 
 
 (0.1) (0.6) (0.3)
Recognition of settlement loss1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 0.1
 1.4
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) 7.4
 (2.8) 1.2
 0.2
 1.7
 (0.7) (0.4) (0.4) 0.9
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and Other comprehensive income (loss) $2.2
 $(7.5) $(3.8) $(0.2) $0.9
 $(1.2) $(0.4) $
 $(0.4)

 Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Service cost$2.8
 $3.1
 $3.1
 $0.1
 $0.1
 $0.1
Interest cost8.0
 8.5
 8.0
 0.4
 0.5
 0.5
Expected return on plan assets(9.4) (10.0) (11.1) 
 
 
Amortization of net loss4.1
 7.1
 6.9
 
 0.2
 0.1
Amortization of prior service cost(0.5) (0.5) (0.8) 
 
 
Curtailment (gain)/loss
 (0.9) 
 
 
 0.1
Net periodic benefit cost$5.0
 $7.3
 $6.1
 $0.5
 $0.8
 $0.8
            
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income           
Net loss (gain)$2.4
 $4.4
 $7.0
 $0.7
 $
 $0.4
Amortization of unrecognized gain (loss)(4.1) (7.1) (6.9) 
 (0.2) (0.1)
Prior service cost
 
 0.4
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service credit0.5
 1.4
 0.8
 
 
 
Total recognized in other comprehensive income(1.2) (1.3) 1.3
 0.7
 (0.2) 0.3
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and           
Other comprehensive income$3.8
 $6.0
 $7.4
 $1.2
 $0.6
 $1.1
1 Represents amortization or recognition of balances previously recorded to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated balance sheets and recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost.
The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit information during 2017, 20162019, 2018, and 20152017 were as follows:
  Pension Benefits Post-retirement Benefits Non-qualified Plan Benefits
  2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Weighted Average Assumptions                  
Discount rate 3.29% 4.33% 3.70% 3.38% 4.38% 3.70% 2.48% 3.78% 3.50%
Expected return on plan assets 4.30% 4.30% 6.80% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Rate of compensation increase 0.5%-3%
 0.5%-3%
 0.5%-3%
 0.5%-3%
 0.5%-3%
 0.5%-3%
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Initial health care cost trend rate N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 6.00% 6.20% 6.50% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Ultimate rate N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Year ultimate rate is reached N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 2037
 2037
 2037
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 Pension Benefits Other Post-retirement Benefits
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Weighted Average Assumptions:
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate3.70% 4.20% 4.50% 3.70% 4.20% 4.50%
Expected return on plan assets6.80% 7.10% 7.10% —% —% —%
Rate of compensation increase0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3% 0.5%-3%
Initial health care cost trend rate      6.50% 6.80% 7.00%
Ultimate rate      4.50% 4.50% 4.50%
Year ultimate rate is reached      2037 2037 2037


86




If the assumed health care cost trend rate were increased or decreased by one percentage point, the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation, as ofat December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018, and 20152017 and the net periodic post-retirement benefit cost for 2017, 20162019, 2018, and 20152017 would have increased or decreased as follows (in millions):
  Other Post-retirement Benefits One Percentage Point
  Increase Decrease
  2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Effect on total of service and interest cost components $0.1
 $0.1
 $0.1
 $
 $(0.1) $
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation $1.0
 $1.0
 $1.3
 $(0.8) $(0.8) $(1.0)

 Other Post-retirement Benefits
 One Percentage Point
 Increase Decrease
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Effect on total of service and interest cost components$0.1
 $0.1
 $0.1
 $
 $
 $
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation$1.3
 $1.0
 $1.1
 $(1.0) $(0.9) $(0.9)
Non-qualified Benefit Plans: The Company has non-qualified supplemental pension plans covering certain employees and retirees, which provide for incremental pension payments from the Company’s general funds so that total pension benefits would be substantially equal to amounts that would have been payable from the Company’s qualified pension plans if it were not for limitations imposed by income tax regulations. The obligations relating to these plans totaled $3.4 million at December 31, 2017. A 3.5 percent discount rate was used to determine the 2017 obligation. There was a cost of $1.3 million associated with the non-qualified plan in 2017, a benefit of $0.6 million in 2016, and a cost of $0.1 million in 2015. The cost in 2017 included a $1.5 million settlement loss. As of December 31, 2017, the amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss for unrecognized loss, net of tax, was approximately $0.5 million, and the amount recognized as unrecognized prior service credit, net of tax, was $0.6 million. The estimated net loss and prior service credit, net of tax, that will be recognized in net periodic pension cost in 2018 is $0.1 million.
Estimated Benefit Payments: The estimated future benefit payments for the next ten years are as follows (in millions):
  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2024-2028
Estimated Benefit Payments            
Pension 13.1
 13.0
 13.0
 12.7
 12.7
 60.4
Post-retirement Benefits 0.8
 0.7
 0.7
 0.6
 0.6
 2.7
Non-qualified Plan Benefits 
 1.2
 
 
 
 1.8

  Pension Non-qualified Post-retirement

 Benefits Plan Benefits Benefits
2018 $12.6
 $0.7
 $0.9
2019 $12.7
 $1.4
 $0.9
2020 $12.6
 $
 $0.9
2021 $12.7
 $
 $0.8
2022 $12.8
 $
 $0.8
2023-2027 $62.8
 $2.1
 $3.5
Current liabilities of approximately $1.5 million, related to non-qualified plan and post-retirement benefits, are classified as accrued and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
Multiemployer Plans: Grace and certain subsidiaries contribute to a number of multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under the terms of collective-bargaining agreements that cover their union-represented employees. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects:
a.Assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
b.If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.
c.If the Company chooses to stop participating in some of its multiemployer plans, the Company may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.
The Company's participation in these plans for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, is outlined in the table below. The "EIN Pension Plan Number" column provides the Employee Identification Number (EIN) and the 3-digit plan number, if applicable. The most recent Pension Protection Act (PPA) zone status available in 20172019 is for the plan's year-end as of December 31, 2016,2018, for the Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers Pension Plan and Laborer's National (Industrial) Pension Fund. The zone status available for 20172019 for the Hawai`Hawai‘i Laborers Trust Funds is for the plan year-end as of February 28, 2017. GP Roadway Solutions, Inc.2019. GPRS and GP/RM Prestress, LLCGPRM have separate contracts and different expiration dates with the Hawai`Hawai‘i Laborers Trust Fund. The zone status is based on information that the Company received from the plan and is

87



certified by the plan's actuary. Among other factors, plans that are less than 65 percent65% funded are "red zone" plans in need of reorganization; plans between 65 percent65% and 80 percent80% funded or that have an accumulated funding deficiency or are expected to have a deficiency in any of the next six years are "yellow zone" plans; plans that meet both of the "yellow zone" criteria are "orange zone" plans; and if the plan is funded more than 80 percent,80%, it is a "green zone" plan. The "FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented" column indicates plans for which a financial improvement plan (FIP) or a rehabilitation plan (RP) is either pending or has been implemented. The last column lists the expiration dates of the collective-bargaining agreements to which the plans are subject.
There were no plans

  Pension Protection Act Zone StatusFIP/RP StatusContribution by EntityContribution by EntityContribution by EntitySurcharge ImposedExpiration DateCurrent Plan Year End
FundEIN Plan No.2019 and 2018Pending/ImplementedJan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2019Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2018Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2017
Operating Engineers94-6090764; 001YellowYes$4.1
$4.7
$4.9
No8/30/2012/31/19
Laborers National52-6074345; 001YellowYes0.2
0.2
0.2
No8/31/2112/31/19
Hawai‘i Laborers (GPRM)99-6025107; 001GreenNo1.1
0.9
0.8
No8/30/202/28/20
Hawai‘i Laborers (GPRS)99-6025107; 001GreenNo0.2
0.2
0.2
No9/30/242/28/20
Total   $5.6
$6.0
$6.1
   

Based upon the most recently available annual reports, the Company's contribution to whichone plan, the Company contributedHawai‘i Laborers Trust Fund, represented more than 5 percent5% of the plan's total contributions.
  Pension Protection Act Zone StatusFIP/RP StatusContribution by EntityContribution by EntityContribution by EntitySurcharge ImposedExpiration DateCurrent Plan Year End
FundEIN Plan No.2017 and 2016Pending/ImplementedJan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2017Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2016Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2015
Operating Engineers94-6090764; 001RedYes$4.9
$4.7
$4.6
No9/2/1912/31/17
Laborers National52-6074345; 001RedYes0.2
0.1
0.1
No8/31/1812/31/17
Hawai`i Laborers99-6025107; 001GreenNo0.8
0.7
0.8
No8/31/192/28/17
Hawai`i Laborers99-6025107; 001GreenNo0.2
0.2
0.2
No9/30/192/28/17
Total   $6.1
$5.7
$5.7
   
Defined Contribution Plans: The Company sponsors defined contribution plans that qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and provides matching contributions of up to 3 percent3% of eligible compensation. The Company’s matching contributions expensed under these plans totaled $0.5$0.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 and $0.6 million in each of the years ended December 31, 20172018 and 2016.2017. The Company also maintains profit sharing plans and, if a minimum threshold of Company performance is achieved, provides contributions of 11% to 5 percent,5%, depending upon Company performance above the minimum threshold. There were no$0.3 million and $0.4 million of profit sharing contribution expenses recognized in 2017, 2016the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2015.2018, and 0 profit sharing contribution expenses in 2017.
Grace 401(k) Plans: The Company allows for discretionary non-elective employer contributions up to the sum of 10 percent10% of each eligible employee's compensation for the 12 months in the plan year, subject to certain limitations. Management profitrevenue sharing bonuses can be deferred to the employee's 401(k) account, but will be subject to the IRS' annual limit on employee elective deferrals. ForGrace recognized discretionary employer contribution and revenue sharing expense of $1.1 million, $1.8 million and $2.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, Grace recognized discretionary employer contributions and profit sharing expense of approximately $2.0 million.respectively.

88



12.INCOME TAXES
For the prior taxable years prior to 2017, the Company has filed a consolidated federal income tax return, which includesincluded all of its wholly owned subsidiaries. For its taxable year ended December 31, 2017,On October 15, 2018, the Company intends to filefiled its tax return as a REIT, which it will accomplish by filing the 2017 Form 1120-REIT with the Internal Revenue Service on or before October 15, 2018.Service. The Company’s TRSs will fileCompany's taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS") filed separately as a C corporation. The Company also files individual separate income tax returns in various states. The Company completed the necessary preparatory work and obtained the necessary approvals such that the Company believes it has been organized and operates in a manner that enables it to qualify, and continue to qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As a result, the income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes a $223 million deferred tax benefit from the de-recognition of the deferred tax assets and liabilities associated with the entities included in the REIT.
As a REIT, the Company will generally be allowed a deduction for dividends that it pays, and therefore, will not be subject to United States federal corporate income tax on its taxable income that is currently distributed to shareholders. The Company may be subject to certain state gross income and franchise taxes, as well as taxes on any undistributed income and federal and state corporate taxes on any income earned by its TRSs.TRS. In addition, the Company could be subject to corporate income taxes related to assets held by the REIT that are sold during the 5-year period following the date of conversion, to the extent such sold assets had a built-in gain as of January 1, 2017. The Company does not intend to dispose of any REIT assets after the REIT conversion within the 5-year period, unless various tax planning strategies, including Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 like-kind exchanges or other deferred tax structures are available to mitigate the built-in gain tax liability of conversion.
Distributions with respect to the Company’s common stock can be characterized for federal income tax purposes as ordinary income, capital gains, unrecaptured section 1250 gains, return of capital, or a combination thereof. Taxable distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 20152017 were classified as ordinary income. Distributions paid for the year ended December 31, 2018 included taxable ordinary income and a non-taxable return of capital.

89




The income tax expense (benefit) on income (loss) from continuing operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following (in millions):
  2019 2018 2017
Current:      
     Federal $(1.6) $(0.3) $(2.6)
     State (0.4) 
 (0.5)
Current $(2.0) $(0.3) $(3.1)
     Deferred:      
     Federal $
 $14.0
 $(200.7)
     State 
 2.6
 (14.4)
     Deferred $
 $16.6
 $(215.1)
Income tax expense (benefit) $(2.0) $16.3
 $(218.2)
 2017 2016 2015
Current:     
Federal$(2.6) $2.9
 $13.4
State(0.5) 0.9
 1.6
Current$(3.1) $3.8
 $15.0
Deferred:     
Federal$(200.7) $(1.4) $18.5
State(14.4) 0.2
 2.8
Deferred$(215.1) $(1.2) $21.3
Income tax expense (benefit)$(218.2) $2.6
 $36.3

Income tax expense (benefit) for 2017, 2016the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 20152017 differs from amounts computed by applying the statutory federal rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes for the following reasons (in millions):
  2019 2018 2017
Computed federal income tax expense $(8.2) $(11.1) $3.3
State income taxes (5.1) (15.6) 0.1
Valuation allowance 8.3
 84.4
 6.9
REIT rate differential (7.9) (51.5) (2.2)
Tax credits, including solar 
 
 (0.3)
Return-to-provision adjustments 
 
 (1.1)
Amended return (1.1) 0.6
 (0.1)
Share-based compensation 
 
 (4.0)
Noncontrolling interest 0.5
 (0.6) (0.7)
Rate change effect related to REIT conversion 
 
 (223.0)
Rate change effect related to Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 
 
 3.0
Impairments 12.4
 10.7
 
Other—net (0.9) (0.6) (0.1)
Income tax expense (benefit) $(2.0) $16.3
 $(218.2)
 2017 2016 2015
Computed federal income tax expense$3.3
 $12.3
 $34.0
State income taxes0.1
 0.6
 4.4
Valuation allowance - state tax credit6.9
 
 
REIT rate differential(2.2) 
 
Nondeductible transaction costs
 2.4
 
Tax credits, including solar(0.3) (8.7) 
Return to provision(1.1) 0.1
 (0.7)
Amended return(0.1) (0.2) 0.1
Share-based compensation(4.0) (1.5) 
Noncontrolling interest(0.7) (0.7) (0.5)
Rate change effect related to REIT conversion(223.0) 
 
Rate change effect related to Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 20173.0
 
 
Other—net(0.1) (1.7) (1.0)
Income tax expense (benefit)$(218.2) $2.6
 $36.3

The change in the Company's effective tax rate was lower for the year ended 2017December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2016year ended December 31, 2018 is primarily due to the deferred tax benefit generated from the de-recognition ofCompany establishing a valuation allowance in 2018 on its net deferred tax assets and liabilities associated withrecognizing substantial 2018 REIT income related to the entities includedAgricultural Land Sale in 2018. In addition, the Company recognized a benefit in the REIT.year ended December 31, 2019 for the interest income on federal refunds resulting from amended returns.

90




The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities atas of December 31, of each year are2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions):
  2019 2018
Deferred tax assets:    
Employee benefits $10.4
 $10.6
Capitalized costs 6.2
 9.7
Joint ventures and other investments 49.1
 55.7
Impairment and amortization 0.9
 0.8
Solar investment benefits 16.7
 16.7
Insurance and other reserves 3.2
 2.6
Disallowed interest expense 8.4
 4.4
Net operating losses 17.6
 8.3
Operating lease liability 2.6
 
Other 3.4
 1.5
Total deferred tax assets $118.5
 $110.3
Valuation allowance (99.3) (91.5)
Total net deferred tax assets $19.2
 $18.8
     
Deferred tax liabilities:    
Property (including tax-deferred gains on real estate transactions) $16.0
 $17.0
Interest rate swap 
 1.0
Operating lease asset 2.5
 
Other 0.7
 0.8
Total deferred tax liabilities $19.2
 $18.8

    
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $
 $
 2017 2016
Deferred tax assets:   
Employee benefits$9.1
 $35.8
Capitalized costs10.7
 23.0
Joint ventures and other investments2.8
 1.3
Impairment and amortization0.7
 11.4
Solar investment benefits16.6
 15.0
Insurance and other reserves2.9
 6.0
Net operating losses7.7
 
Other1.4
 3.5
Total deferred tax assets$51.9
 $96.0
Valuation allowance(6.9) 
Total net deferred tax assets$45.0
 $96.0
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Property (including tax-deferred gains on real estate transactions)$25.7
 $260.3
Straight-line rental income and advanced rent
 8.4
Other2.8
 9.3
Total deferred tax liabilities$28.5
 $278.0
    
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$16.5
 $(182.0)

Federal tax credit carryforwards as ofat December 31, 20172019 totaled $8.7$8.8 million and will expire in 2036. State tax credit carryforwards as ofat December 31, 20172019 totaled $6.9 million and may be carried forward indefinitely under state law. As of December 31, 20172019, the Company had federal andnet operating loss carryforwards of $12.6 million, $3.4 million of which expire in 2037, with the remaining being carried forward indefinitely under federal law. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had state net operating loss carryforwards of $6.2$5.0 million, of which $0.6 million of California net operating loss carryforwards will expire in 2030, $1.4 million of Hawai‘i net operating loss carryforwards will expire in 2037, and $1.5the remaining $3.0 million respectively, both expiring in 2037.of Hawai‘i net operating loss carryforwards to be carried forward indefinitely.
A valuation allowance must be provided if it is more likely than not that some portion ofor all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, based upon consideration of all positive and negative evidence. Sources of evidence include, among other things, a history of pretax earnings or losses, expectations of future results, tax planning opportunities and appropriate tax law.

SinceDue to the recent losses the Company converted to a REIT forhas generated in its TRS, the year ended December 31, 2017, realization of the benefit from state tax creditsCompany believes that it is not more likely than not.not that its U.S. and state deferred tax assets will not be realized as of December 31, 2019. Therefore, a fullthe Company recorded an increase in the valuation allowance of $6.9$7.8 million was established againston its net U.S. and state deferred tax assets for the state tax credits until such time ascurrent period. Should the Company determinesdetermine that it iswould be able to benefit from the credits due to certain dispositions of C corporationrealize its deferred tax assets that the Company received in the initial REIT conversion.foreseeable future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets may cause a material increase to income in the period such determination is made. Significant management judgment is required in determining the period in which reversal of a valuation allowance should occur.
  Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Reductions Balance at End of Year
2019 $91.5
 $7.8
 $
 $99.3
2018 $6.9
 $84.6
 $
 $91.5
2017 
 6.9
 
 6.9

The Company’s income taxes receivable has been increased by the tax benefits from share-based compensation. The Company receives an income tax benefit for exercised stock options calculated as the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of exercise and the option exercise price, tax-effected. The Company also receives an income tax


benefit for restricted stock units when they vest, measured as the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of vesting, tax effected. TheThere were 0 net tax benefits from share-based transactions totaled $5.3 million and $1.9 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.
In 2016, the Company invested $15.4 million in Waihonu Equity Holdings, LLC ("Waihonu"), an entity that operates two photovoltaic facilities with a combined capacity of 6.5 megawatts in Mililani, Oahu. The Company accounts for its investment in Waihonu under the equity method. The investment return from the Company's investment in Waihonu is principally composed of non-refundable federal and refundable state tax credits. The federal tax credits are accounted for using the flow through method, which reduces the provision for income taxes in the year that the federal tax credits first become available. During 2016, the Company recognized income tax benefits of approximately $8.7 million related to the non-refundable tax credits, $2.9 million related to the refundable state tax credits in Income Tax Receivable, as well as a

91



corresponding reduction to the carrying amount of its investment in Waihonu, recorded in Investments in Affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded reductions to the carrying value of its Waihonu and KIUC Renewable Solutions Two ("KRS II") investments of $2.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in Reduction in Solar Investments, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded reductions to the carrying value of its Waihonu and KRS II investments of $8.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in Reduction in Solar Investments, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.2019 or 2018.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2017, accrued2019, the Company recognized a $1.1 million benefit for the interest and penalties were not material. As of December 31, 2017, theincome on federal refunds resulting from amended returns. The Company has not identified any material unrecognized tax positions.positions and as such has 0 related interest or penalty accruals.
The Company is subject to taxation by the United States and various state and local jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2017,2019, tax years 2016 2015, 2014 and 2013later are open to audit by the tax authorities. The federal auditAs of December 31, 2019, the 2012Company has one open tax returnexamination for the Company on a standalone basis and the 2012 tax return for which the Company was included in the consolidated tax group with Matson has concluded. The Department of Taxation also completed its audit of the 2015 Hawai`2016 Hawai‘i state income tax return for the Company. There were no material adjustments to the income statement resulting from the completion of these audits. The IRS is currently auditing tax years 2013 and 2014. In February 2018, the Company was notified that the IRS will be auditing tax years 2016 and 2015 and the Department of Taxation will be auditing tax year 2016.return. The Company believes that the result of these open auditsthis audit will not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
On December 22, 2017, The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Act") was signed into law. The Act made significant changes, including lowering the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. As of December 31, 2017 the Company has completed its accounting for the tax effects of the Act and recorded a tax expense of $3.0 million due to a remeasurement of its deferred tax assets and liabilities.
13.SHARE-BASED PAYMENT AWARDS
2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (“2012 Plan”):13.    SHARE-BASED PAYMENT AWARDS
The 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan ("2012 Plan") allows for the granting of stock options, restricted stock units and common stock. UnderDuring 2018, the 2012 Plan, 4.3 millionCompany retroactively approved an increase to the shares of common stock were initially reserved for issuance and asat January 1, 2018 from 4.3 million shares to 5.3 million shares. As of December 31, 2017, 1.12019 there were 1.5 million remaining shares of the Company’s common stock remained available for future issuance.grants. The shares of common stock authorized to be issued under the 2012 Plan may be drawn from the shares of the Company’sCompany's authorized but unissued common stock or from shares of its common stock that the Company acquires, including shares purchased on the open market or private transactions.
The 2012 Plan consists of four4 separate incentive compensation programs: (i) the discretionary grant program, (ii) the stock issuance program, (iii) the incentive bonus program and (iv) the automatic grant program for the non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors. Share-based compensation is generally awarded under three3 of the four4 programs, as more fully described below.
Discretionary Grant Program: Under the Discretionary Grant Program, stock options may be granted with an exercise price no less than 100 percent100% of the fair market value (defined as the closing market price) of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. Options generally become exercisable ratably over three years and have a maximum contractual term of 10ten years. There were no0 option grants in 2019, 2018 or 2017, and 2016, and the Company currently has no plans to issue options in the future.
Stock Issuance Program: Under the Stock Issuance Program, shares of common stock or restricted stock units may be granted.granted. Equity awards granted may be designated as time-based awards or market-based performance awards.
Automatic Grant Program: At each annual shareholder meeting, non-employee directors will receive an award of restricted stock units that entitle the holder to an equivalent number of shares of common stock upon vesting.
In connection with the completion of the Holding Company Merger, all A&B Predecessor restricted stock units outstanding on November 8, 2017 were replaced with A&B restricted stock units with terms and conditions substantially identical to the terms and conditions formerly applicable to the A&B Predecessor restricted stock units that were replaced. Additionally, effective as of the completion of the Holding Company Merger, all A&B Predecessor stock options outstanding on November 8, 2017 were replaced with A&B stock options with terms and conditions substantially identical to the terms and conditions formerly applicable to the A&B Predecessor stock options.


92



As a result of the Special Distribution, which was paid in the form of cash and stock, the Company's restricted stock units and outstanding stock options were adjusted under the anti-dilution provisions of the 2012 Plan. The number of shares of each restricted stock unit and stock option award and the exercise price of each stock option award were adjusted in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding awards and accordingly did not result in additional compensation expense.

The following table summarizes the Company's stock option activity during 2017for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands, except weighted averageweighted-average exercise price and weighted averageweighted-average contractual life):
  2012 Plan
Stock Options
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Contractual
Life
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2019 580.1 $12.91
    
Exercised (225.8) $11.29
    
Canceled (2.1) $13.11
    
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 352.2 $13.95
 1.5 years $2,441
Vested or expected to vest 352.2 $13.95
 1.5 years $2,441
Exercisable, December 31, 2019 352.2 $13.95
 1.5 years $2,441

 2012 Plan
Stock Options
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Contractual
Life
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2017903.5
 $17.78
    
Exercised Prior to Special Distribution(233.6) $16.47
    
Anti-dilutive Adjustment for Special Distribution342.2
      
Exercised Subsequent to Special Distribution(381.6) $11.25
    
Outstanding, December 31, 2017630.5
 $12.58
 2.9 years $9,516
Vested or expected to vest630.5
 $12.58
 2.9 years $9,516
Exercisable, December 31, 2017630.5
 $12.58
 2.9 years $9,516


The following table summarizes 2017 non-vested restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands, except weighted-average grant-date fair value amounts):
  2012 Plan
Restricted
Stock Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant-date
Fair Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2019 421.3 $25.91
Granted 264.0 $20.05
Vested (149.5) $23.72
Canceled (81.1) $22.24
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 454.7 $23.88
 2012 Plan
Restricted
Stock Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant-date
Fair Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2017293.5
 $33.81
Granted139.1
 $42.85
Vested(96.3) $37.20
Canceled(17.4) $35.03
Outstanding, December 31, 2017318.9
 $36.66

The time-based restricted stock units granted to employees vest ratably over 3a period of three years. The time-based restricted stock units granted to non-employee directors prior to 2018 vest ratably over a period of three years, and commencing in 2018, the time-based restricted stock units granted to non-employee directors vest over one year. The market-based performance share units cliff vest over 3three years, provided that the total shareholder return of the Company’sCompany's common stock over the relevant period meets or exceeds pre-defined levels of total shareholder returns relative to indices, as defined.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, there was $6.0$5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock units granted under the 2012 plan; that cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 3three years.
The fair value of the Company’sCompany's time-based awards is determined using the Company's stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of the Company's market-based awards is estimated using the Company's stock price on the date of grant and the probability of vesting using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following weighted-average assumptions:
  2019 Grants 2018 Grants 2017 Grants
Volatility of A&B common stock 23.6% 22.7% 24.1%
Average volatility of peer companies 24.2% 21.6% 25.6%
Risk-free interest rate 2.5% 2.3% 1.6%

 2017 Grants 2016 Grants
Volatility of A&B common stock24.1% 26.3%
Average volatility of peer companies25.6% 35.3%
Risk-free interest rate1.6% 1.1%
The weighted averageweighted-average grant date fair value of the time-based restricted units and market-based performance share units was$42.85granted in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $20.05, $28.76 and $30.91 in 2016.$42.85, respectively. No compensation cost is recognized for estimated or actual forfeitures of time-based or

93



market-based awards if an employee is terminated prior to rendering the requisite service period. TheThere was 0 tax benefit realized upon vesting werefor the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Tax benefit realized upon vesting was $1.0 million $0.9 million and $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2017.
The Company recognizes compensation cost net of actual forfeitures of time-based or market-based awards. A summary of compensation cost related to share-based payments is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
  2019 2018 2017
Share-based expense:      
Time-based and market-based restricted stock units $5.4
 $4.7
 $4.4
Total share-based expense 5.4
 4.7
 4.4
Total recognized tax benefit 
 
 (0.5)
Share-based expense (net of tax) $5.4
 $4.7
 $3.9
       
Cash received upon option exercise $2.6
 $0.4
 $8.1
Intrinsic value of options exercised $2.6
 $0.4
 $13.2
Tax benefit realized upon option exercise $
 $
 $4.2
Fair value of stock vested $4.5
 $4.0
 $3.7
 2017 2016 2015
Share-based expense (net of estimated forfeitures):     
Time-based and market-based restricted stock units$4.4
 $4.1
 $4.6
Total share-based expense4.4
 4.1
 4.6
Total recognized tax benefit(0.5) (1.4) (1.2)
Share-based expense (net of tax)$3.9
 $2.7
 $3.4
      
Cash received upon option exercise$8.1
 $4.6
 $0.5
Intrinsic value of options exercised$13.2
 $2.6
 $0.5
Tax benefit realized upon option exercise$4.2
 $1.0
 $0.2
Fair value of stock vested$3.7
 $2.2
 $4.2


14.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


14.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies: Commitments and financial arrangements not recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet, excluding lease commitments that are disclosed in Note 9, included the following as of(in millions) at December 31, 2017:2019:
Standby letters of credit(a)
$1.7
Bonds(b)
$383.9

Standby letters of credit(a)
$11.8
Bonds(b)
$428.3
(a) Consists of standby letters of credit, issued by the Company’s lenders under the Company’s revolving credit facilities, and relate primarily to the Company’s real estate activities.self insurance and workers' compensation plans. In the event the letters of credit are drawn upon, the Company would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit. None of the letters of credit have been drawn upon to date.
(b) Represents bonds related to construction and real estate activities in Hawai`Hawai‘i. Approximately$404.3 $364.6 million is related torepresents the face value of construction bonds issued by third party sureties (bid, performance and payment bonds) and the remainder is related to commercial bonds issued by third party sureties (permit, subdivision, license and notary bonds). In the event the bonds are drawn upon, the Company would be obligated to reimburse the surety that issued the bond. Nonebond for the amount of the bonds has been drawn uponbond, reduced for the work completed to date. As of December 31, 2019, the Company's estimated remaining exposure, assuming defaults on all existing contractual construction obligations, was approximately $39.4 million.
Indemnity Agreements: For certain real estate joint ventures, the Company may be obligated under bond indemnities to complete construction of the real estate development if the joint venture does not perform. These indemnities are designed to protect the surety in exchange for the issuance of surety bonds that cover joint venture construction activities, such as project amenities, roads, utilities, and other infrastructure, at its joint ventures. Under the indemnities, the Company and its joint venture partners agree to indemnify the surety bond issuer from all losses and expenses arising from the failure of the joint venture to complete the specified bonded construction. The maximum potential amount of aggregate future payments is a function of the amount covered by outstanding bonds at the time of default by the joint venture, reduced by the amount of work completed to date. The recorded amounts of the indemnity liabilities were not material, individually or in the aggregate.
The Company is a guarantor of indebtedness for certain of itsan unconsolidated joint ventures' borrowings withborrowing from a third party lenders, relatinglender, related to the repayment of a construction loansloan and performance of construction for the underlying project. As ofAt December 31, 2017,2019, the Company's limited guaranteesguarantee on the indebtedness related to five of its unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $5.6$3.1 million. The Company has not incurred any significant historical losses related to guarantees on its joint venture indebtedness.
In July 2014, the Company invested $23.8 million in a tax equity investment related to the construction and operation of a 12-megawatt solar farm on Kauai. The Company recovers its investment primarily through tax credits and tax benefits. In connection with this investment, the Company provided a contingent $6.0 million guaranty of KRS II project debt. The other equity partner and managing member of KRS II, project sponsor and customer for the output of the facility, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative, is the primary guarantor of the project debt.

94



Other than obligations described above and those described in Notes 5 and 8, obligations of the Company’s joint ventures do not have recourse to the Company and the Company’s “at-risk” amounts are limited to its investment.
Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies: A&B owns Prior to the Agricultural Land Sale of approximately 41,000 acres of agricultural land on Maui to Mahi Pono in December 2018, the Company, through East Maui Irrigation Company, LLC ("EMI"), also owned approximately 16,000 acres of watershed lands in East Maui. A&BMaui and also held four4 water licenses to anotherapproximately 30,000 acres owned by the State of Hawai`Hawai‘i in East Maui. The sale to Mahi Pono includes the sale of a 50% interest in EMI (which closed February 1, 2019), and provides for the Company and Mahi Pono, through EMI, to jointly continue the existing process to secure a long-term lease from the State for delivery of irrigation water to Mahi Pono for use in Central Maui.
The last of these water license agreements expired in 1986, and all four4 agreements were then extended as revocable permits that were renewed annually. In 2001, a request was made to the State Board of Land and Natural Resources (the "BLNR") to replace these revocable permits with a long-term water lease. Pending the conclusioncompletion by the BLNR of thisa contested case hearing it ordered to be held on the request for the long-term lease, the BLNR has kept the existing permits on a holdover basis. ThreeNaN parties filed a lawsuit on April 10, 2015 (the "4/10/15"Initial Lawsuit") alleging that the BLNR has been renewing the revocable permits annually rather than keeping them in holdover status. The lawsuit asksasked the court to void the revocable permits and to declare that the renewals were illegally issued without preparation of an environmental assessment ("EA"). In December 2015, the BLNR decided to reaffirm its prior decisions to keep the permits in holdover status. This decision by the BLNR is beingwas challenged by the three3 parties. In January 2016, the court ruled in the 4/10/15Initial Lawsuit that the renewals were not subject to the EA requirement, but that the BLNR lacked legal authority to keep the revocable permits in holdover status beyond one year.year (the "Initial Ruling"). The court has allowedInitial Ruling was appealed to the parties to make an immediate appealIntermediate Court of this ruling. Appeals ("ICA") of the State of Hawai‘i.
In May 2016, while the Hawai`appeal of the Initial Ruling was pending, the Hawai‘i State Legislature passed House Bill 2501, which specified that the BLNR has the legal authority to issue holdover revocable permits for the disposition of water rights for a period not to exceed three years. The governor signed this bill into law as Act 126 in June 2016. Pursuant to Act 126, the annual authorization of the existing holdover permits was sought and granted by the BLNR in December 2016, November 2017 and November 2017.2018 for calendar years 2017, 2018 and 2019. No extension of Act 126 was approved by the Hawai‘i State Legislature in 2019.
In addition, on May 24, 2001, petitions were filed by a third party, requestingJune 2019, the ICA vacated the Initial Ruling, effectively reversing the determination that the Commission on Water Resource ManagementBLNR lacked authority to keep the revocable permits in holdover status beyond one year (the "ICA Ruling"). The ICA remanded the case back to the trial court to determine whether the holdover status of the permits was both (a) "temporary" and (b) in the best interest of the State, as required by statute. The plaintiffs filed a motion with the ICA for reconsideration of Hawai`its decision, which was denied on July 5, 2019. On September 30, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a request with the Supreme Court of Hawai‘i ("Water Commission") establish interim instream flow standards ("IIFS")to review and reverse the ICA


Ruling. On November 25, 2019, the Supreme Court of Hawai‘i granted the plaintiffs' request to review the ICA Ruling. On October 11, 2019, the BLNR took up the renewal of all the existing water revocable permits in 27the state, acting under the ICA Ruling, and approved the continuation of the 4 East Maui streams that feed the Company's irrigation system. The Water Commission initially took actionwater revocable permits for another one-year period through December 31, 2020.
In a separate matter, on the petitions in 2008 and 2010, but the petitioners requestedDecember 7, 2018, a contested case hearing to challengerequest filed by the Water Commission's decisions on certain petitions. The Water Commission deniedSierra Club contesting the contested case hearing request, but the petitioners successfully appealed the denial to the Hawai`i Intermediate Court of Appeals, which ordered the Water Commission to grant the request. The Commission then authorized the appointment of a hearings officer for the contested case hearing and expanded the scopeBLNR's November 2018 approval of the contested case hearing to encompass all 27 petitions for amendment2019 revocable permits was denied by the BLNR. On January 7, 2019, Sierra Club filed a lawsuit in the circuit court of the IIFS for East Maui streamsfirst circuit in 23 hydrologic units. The evidentiary phaseHawai‘i against BLNR, A&B, and EMI, seeking to invalidate the 2019 extension of the hearing beforerevocable permits for, among other things, failure to perform an EA. The lawsuit also seeks to have the Commission-appointed hearings officer was completed on April 2, 2015. On January 15, 2016, the Commission-appointed hearings officer issued his recommended decision on the petitions. The recommended decision would restore water to streams in 11 of the 23 hydrologic units. In March 2016, the hearings officer orderedBLNR enjoin A&B/EMI from diverting more than 25 million gallons a reopening of the contested case proceedings in light of the Company’s January 2016 announcement to cease sugar operations at HC&S by the end of the year and to transition today until a new diversified agricultural model on the former sugar lands. In April 2016, the Company announced its commitment to fully and permanently restore the priority taro streams identified by the petitioners. Re-opened evidentiary hearings occurred in the first quarter of 2017 and a decisionpermit or lease is pending. In August 2017, the hearings officer in the reopened evidentiary hearing issued his proposed decision. The Commission heard arguments on the proposed decision in October 2017.
HC&S also used water from four streams in Central Maui ("Na Wai Eha") to irrigate its agricultural lands in Central Maui.  Beginning in 2004, the Water Commission began proceedings to establish IIFS for the Na Wai Eha streams. Before the IIFS proceedings were concluded, the Water Commission designated Na Wai Eha as a surface water management area, meaning that all uses of water from these streams required water use permitsproperly issued by the Water Commission. Following contested case proceedings, the Water Commission established IIFS in 2010, but that decision was appealed,BLNR, and the Hawai`i Supreme Court remanded the case to the Water Commission for further proceedings. The parties to the IIFS contested case settled the case in 2014. Thereafter, proceedings for the issuanceimposition of water use permits commenced with over 100 applicants, including HC&S, vying for permits. While the water use permit proceedings were ongoing, A&B announced the cessation of sugar cane cultivation at the end of 2016.  This announcement triggered a re-opening and reconsideration of the 2014 IIFS decision. Contested case proceedings were held to simultaneously reconsider the IIFS, determine appurtenant water rights, and consider applications for water use permits. Based on those proceedings, the Hearing Officer issued his recommendation to the Water Commission on November 1, 2017. The Commission has not yet issued its decision.
If the Company is not permitted to use sufficient quantities of stream waters, it would have a material adverse effectcertain conditions on the Company’s pursuit ofrevocable permits by the BLNR. The count seeking to invalidate the revocable permits based on the failure to perform an EA has been dismissed by the court, based on the ICA Ruling in the Initial Lawsuit. In connection with A&B’s obligation to continue the existing process to secure a diversified agribusiness model in subsequent yearslong-term water lease from the State, A&B and EMI will defend against the value ofremaining claims made by the Company’s agricultural lands.Sierra Club.
A&BThe Company is a party to, or may be contingently liable in connection with, other legal actions arising in the normal conduct of its businesses, the outcomes of which, in the opinion of management after consultation with counsel, would not have a material effect on A&B’sthe Company's consolidated financial statements as a whole.

95


15.    DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

15.DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk related to its floating rate interest debt. The Company balances its cost of debt and exposure to interest rates primarily through its mix of fixed and floating rate debt. From time to time, the Company may use interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to interest rate risk.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
During 2016, theThe Company entered intohas an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $60.0$59.5 million as of December 31, 2019, which wasis designated as a cash flow hedge. The Company structured the interest rate swap agreement to hedge the variability of future interest payments due to changes in interest rates with regards to the Company's long-term debt. A summary of the key terms related to the Company's outstanding cash flow hedge as of December 31, 20172019, is as follows (dollars in millions):
EffectiveMaturityFixed Notional Amount at Fair Value atClassification on
DateDateInterest Rate December 31, 2019 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018Balance Sheet
4/7/20168/1/20293.14% $59.5
 $(0.2) $3.9
Accrued and other liabilities

    Notional Amount at Fair Value atClassification on
Effective DateMaturity DateInterest Rate December 31, 2017 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016Balance Sheet
4/7/20168/1/20293.14% $60.0
 $2.8
 $2.8
Other assets
The Company assessedliability related to the effectivenessinterest rate swap as of December 31, 2019 is presented within Accrued and other liabilities in the cash flow hedge at inceptionconsolidated balance sheet. The asset related to the interest rate swap as of December 31, 2018 was presented within Prepaid expenses and will continue to do so on an ongoing basis.other assets. The effective portion of the changes in fair value of the cash flow hedge isare recorded in accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) and subsequently reclassified into interest expense as interest is incurred on the related-variable raterelated variable-rate debt. When ineffectiveness exists, the ineffective portion of changes in fair value of the cash flow hedge is recognized in earnings in the period affected.
Non-designated Hedges
As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company has two1 interest rate swapsswap that havehas not been designated as a cash flow hedgeshedge, whose key terms are as follows (dollars in millions):
EffectiveMaturityFixed Notional Amount at Fair Value atClassification on
DateDateInterest Rate December 31, 2019 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018Balance Sheet
1/1/20149/1/20215.95% $10.2
 $(0.5) $(0.5)Accrued and other liabilities
    Notional Amount at Fair Value atClassification on
Effective DateMaturity DateInterest Rate December 31, 2017 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016Balance Sheet
1/1/20149/1/20215.95% $10.9
 $(0.9) $(1.3)Other non-current liabilities
6/18/20083/1/20215.98% $4.8
 $(0.3) $(0.5)Other non-current liabilities
Total   $15.7
 $(1.2) $(1.8) 

The following table represents the pre-tax effect of the derivative instruments in the Company's consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
  2019 2018
Derivatives in Designated Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:    
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI on derivatives $(4.0) $1.0
Impact of reclassification adjustment to interest expense included in Net Income (Loss) $(0.1) $

  2017 2016
Derivatives in Designated Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:    
Amount of (gain) loss recognized in OCI on derivatives (effective portion) $0.4
 $(2.6)
Amounts of (gain) loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings under "interest expense" (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) $(0.5) $(0.4)
Derivatives Not Designated as Cash Flow Hedges:    
Amount of realized and unrealized loss on derivatives recognized in earnings under "interest income and other" $0.6
 $0.7


The Company recorded 0.6 million and $0.7 million of income during 2017 and 2016, respectively,records gains or losses related to the change in fair value of the interest rate swaps that have not been designated as cash flow hedges in Interest income and other income (loss)in the accompanyingits consolidated statements of operations. There were 0 amounts recognized in 2019 and $0.4 million of gains recognized in 2018 related to changes in fair value.
The Company measures all of its interest rate swaps at fair value. The fair values of the Company's interest rate swaps (Level 2) are based on the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date and are determined using interest rate pricing models and interest rate related observable inputs.

96


16.    EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS")

16.EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS")
Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net earnings allocated to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net earnings allocated to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, as adjusted for the potential dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards, as well as adjusted by the number of additional shares, if any, that would have been outstanding had the potentially dilutive common shares been issued.
On November 16, 2017, the Company declared the Special Distribution on its shares of common stock in an aggregate amount of $783.0 million, or approximately $15.92 per share. The Company paid the Special Distribution on January 23, 2018. The Special Distribution was payable in the form of cash and shares of the Company's stock at the election of each shareholder, subject to an aggregate limit of $156.6 million of cash (the "Shareholder Election"). As the deadline for the common shareholders' election was January 12, 2018, subsequent to December 31, 2017, the total Special Distribution of $783.0 million was included in the computation of the Company's diluted earnings (loss) per share.

The following table provides a reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations to income (loss) from continuing operations available to A&B shareholders and net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes$228.1
 $32.7
 $60.8
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interest(2.2) (1.8) (1.5)
Income from continuing operations attributable to A&B shareholders, net of income taxes225.9
 30.9
 59.3
Undistributed earnings (losses) allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interest1.8
 1.3
 (3.1)
Income from continuing operations available to A&B shareholders, net of income taxes227.7
 32.2
 56.2
Income (loss) from discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders, net of income taxes2.4
 (41.1) (29.7)
Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders$230.1
 $(8.9) $26.5
  2019 2018 2017
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(36.9) $(69.2) $228.1
Exclude: (Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest 2.0
 (2.2) (2.2)
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to A&B shareholders (34.9) (71.4) 225.9
Exclude: (Increase) decrease in carrying value of redeemable non-controlling interest 
 
 1.8
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to A&B shareholders (34.9) (71.4) 227.7
Distributions and allocations to participating securities (0.2) 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to A&B common shareholders (35.1) (71.4) 227.7
Income (loss) from discontinued operations available to A&B common shareholders (1.5) (0.6) 2.4
Net income (loss) available to A&B common shareholders $(36.6) $(72.0) $230.1
The number of shares used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share isfor the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):
  2019 2018 2017
Denominator for basic EPS - weighted average shares outstanding 72.2
 70.6
 49.2
Effect of dilutive securities:      
Stock options and restricted stock unit awards 
 
 0.8
Special Distribution 
 
 3.0
Denominator for diluted EPS - weighted average shares outstanding 72.2
 70.6
 53.0
 2017 2016 2015
Denominator for basic EPS – weighted-average shares outstanding49.2
 49.0
 48.9
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Non-participating stock options and restricted stock unit awards0.8
 0.4
 0.4
Special Distribution3.0
 
 
Denominator for diluted EPS – weighted-average shares outstanding53.0
 49.4
 49.3

There were no0.2 million shares of anti-dilutive securities outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2017, 20162019. There were 0 shares of anti-dilutive securities outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2015.

2017.
17.     REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
The Company has a 70 percent70% ownership interest in GLP that was acquired in connection with the acquisitionthrough its ownership of Grace Pacific LLC.Pacific. The redeemable noncontrolling interest of GLP is recorded at the greater of (i) the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interest's share of net income or loss and distributions, or (ii) the redemption value, which is derived from a specified formula. These adjustments are reflected in the computation of earnings per share using the two-class method.

97





18.CESSATION OF SUGAR OPERATIONS
18.    CESSATION OF SUGAR OPERATIONS
A summary of the pre-tax costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 and remainingcumulative pre-tax costs associated with the Cessation iscessation of sugar operations were as follows (in millions):
 Charges Recognized During 2017 Cumulative Amount Recognized as of
December 31, 2017
 Remaining to be Recognized Total Year Ended December 31, 2019 Cumulative Amount
Employee severance benefits and related costs $0.3
 $22.1
 $
 $22.1
 $
 $22.1
Asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation 
 71.3
 
 71.3
 
 71.3
Property removal, restoration and other exit-related costs 2.4
 9.5
 0.9
 10.4
 1.1
 11.2
Total Cessation-related costs $2.7
 $102.9
 $0.9
 $103.8
Total cessation-related costs $1.1
 $104.6
A rollforwardActivity of the Cessation-relatedcessation-related liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2017 is2019 were as follows (in millions):

 
Other Exit Costs1
Balance at December 31, 2018 $4.1
Expense 1.1
Cash payments (1.4)
Balance at December 31, 2019 $3.8


 Employee Severance Benefits and Related Costs 
Other Exit Costs1
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2016 $13.7
 $5.4
 $19.1
Expense 0.3
 2.4
 2.7
Cash payments (14.0) (3.2) (17.2)
Balance at December 31, 2017 $
 $4.6
 $4.6
1Includes asset retirement obligations.
The Cessation-related liabilities were includedare presented within Accrued and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows (in millions):at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
  Classification on Balance Sheet December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Employee severance benefits and related costs HC&S cessation-related liabilities $
 $13.7
Other exit costs HC&S cessation-related liabilities 4.6
 5.4
Total Cessation-related liabilities   $4.6
 $19.1

98


19.    SEGMENT RESULTS

19.SEGMENT RESULTS
Operating segments are components of an enterprise that engage in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available. The Company operates threeand reports on 3 segments: Commercial Real Estate (formerly Leasing);Estate; Land Operations (formerly Real Estate Development and Sales and Agribusiness);Operations; and Materials & Construction.
The Commercial Real Estate segment owns, operates, and manages a portfolio of retail, office and industrial properties in Hawai`Hawai‘i and on the Mainland totaling 4.03.9 million square feet of GLA.gross leasable area. The Company also leases 117approximately 153.8 acres of commercial land in Hawai`Hawai‘i to third-party lessees.
The Land Operations segment generates its revenues and creates value through an active and comprehensive program of land stewardship, planning, entitlement, development, real estate investment and sale of land and commercial and residential properties, principally in Hawai`Hawai‘i.
The Materials & Construction segment performs asphalt paving as prime contractor and subcontractor; imports and sells liquid asphalt; mines, processes and sells rock and sand aggregates; produces and sells asphaltic concrete and ready-mix concrete; provides and sells various construction- and traffic-control-related products and manufactures and sells precast concrete products.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are described in the summary of significant accounting policies.Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies. Reportable segments are measured based on operating profit, exclusive of interest expense, general corporate expenses and income taxes. Revenues related to transactions between reportable segments have been eliminated.eliminated in consolidation. Transactions between reportable segments are accounted for on the same basis as transactions with unrelated third parties.
General contractorA significant portion of Materials & Construction revenue and subcontractor revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were derivedaccounts receivable is generated directly and indirectly from the State of Hawai`i in the amounts of $60.2 million and $50.1 million, respectively. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, amounts were derived directly and indirectly fromprojects administered by the City and County of Honolulu and from the State of Hawai‘i. Reductions in funding of infrastructure projects by these government agencies could reduce our revenue and profits from our M&C segment. Further, although the amountscustomer mix of $67.7real estate sales in any given period in our Land Operations segment may be diverse in any given period, during the year ended December 31, 2018, the Land Operations segment recognized $162.2 million and $52.0 million, respectively.of gross profit from the Agricultural Land Sale to Mahi Pono.

99




Operating segment information for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018 and 20152017 is summarized as below (in millions):

2017 2016 2015
Revenue:     
Commercial Real Estate$136.9
 $134.7
 $133.6
Land Operations84.5
 61.9
 120.2
Materials & Construction204.1
 190.9
 219.0
Total revenue425.5
 387.5
 472.8
Operating Profit (Loss):     
Commercial Real Estate1,2
34.4
 54.8
 53.2
Land Operations3,4
14.2
 7.0
 61.7
Materials & Construction5
22.0
 23.3
 30.9
Total operating profit70.6
 85.1
 145.8
Interest expense(25.6) (26.3) (26.8)
General corporate expenses(29.2) (22.1) (20.1)
REIT evaluation/conversion costs6
(15.2) (9.5) 
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Net Gain (Loss) on Sale of Improved Properties0.6
 27.2
 98.9
Income tax benefit (expense)7
218.2
 0.5
 (37.0)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Net Gain (Loss) on Sale of Improved Properties218.8
 27.7
 61.9
Net gain (loss) on the sale of improved properties, net of income taxes8
9.3
 5.0
 (1.1)
Income From Continuing Operations228.1
 32.7
 60.8
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes2.4
 (41.1) (29.7)
Net Income (Loss)230.5
 (8.4) 31.1
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest(2.2) (1.8) (1.5)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders$228.3
 $(10.2) $29.6

 2019 2018 2017
Operating Revenue:      
Commercial Real Estate $160.6
 $140.3
 $136.9
Land Operations 114.1
 289.5
 84.5
Materials & Construction 160.5
 214.6
 204.1
Total operating revenue 435.2
 644.4
 425.5
Operating Profit (Loss):      
Commercial Real Estate1
 66.2
 58.5
 34.4
Land Operations2
 20.8
 (26.7) 14.2
Materials & Construction6
 (69.2) (73.2) 22.0
Total operating profit (loss) 17.8
 (41.4) 70.6
Gain (loss) on the sale of commercial real estate properties 
 51.4
 9.3
Interest expense (33.1) (35.3) (25.6)
General corporate expenses (23.6) (27.6) (29.2)
REIT evaluation/conversion costs 
 
 (15.2)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes $(38.9) $(52.9) $9.9
       
Identifiable Assets:      
Commercial Real Estate $1,532.6
 $1,530.4
 $1,128.1
Land Operations3
 282.5
 350.0
 604.2
Materials & Construction 243.0
 297.1
 379.2
Other 26.2
 47.7
 119.7
Total assets $2,084.3
 $2,225.2
 $2,231.2
       
Capital Expenditures:      
Commercial Real Estate4
 $250.5
 $282.7
 $32.8
Land Operations5
 2.3
 1.4
 1.4
Materials & Construction 1.9
 11.0
 6.3
Other 0.4
 1.0
 0.2
Total capital expenditures $255.1
 $296.1
 $40.7
       
Depreciation and Amortization:      
Commercial Real Estate $36.7
 $28.0
 $26.0
Land Operations 1.6
 1.9
 1.6
Materials & Construction 11.4
 12.1
 12.2
Other 0.8
 0.8
 1.6
Total depreciation and amortization $50.5
 $42.8
 $41.4

1 Commercial Real Estate segment operating profit (loss) includes intersegment operating revenue, primarily from ourthe Materials & Construction segment, and is eliminated in ourthe consolidated results of operations.
2Commercial Real Estate Land Operations segment operating profit (loss) includes $22.4 million of impairments ofequity in earnings (losses) from the Company's various real estate for three mainland properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017.joint ventures and non-cash reductions related to the Company's solar tax equity investments.
3 The Land Operations segment includes approximately $3.3 million, $15.1 million, and $30.2 millionassets related to its investment in equity in earnings from its various real estate joint ventures.
4 Represents gross capital additions to the commercial real estate portfolio, including gross tax deferred property purchases but excluding the assumption of debt, that are reflected as non-cash transactions in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
5 Excludes expenditures for real estate developments held for sale, which are classified as cash flows from operating activities within the consolidated statements of cash flows, and excludes investment in joint ventures classified as cash flows from investing activities.
6 Materials & Construction segment operating profit (loss) for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Land Operationsthe year ended December 31, 2019 includes an impairment charge related to its goodwill of $49.7 million. Materials & Construction segment alsooperating profit (loss) for the December 31, 2018 includes non-cashcumulative impairment charges of $11.7 million in 2016 related to certain non-active, long-term development projects.long-lived assets, finite-lived intangible assets, and goodwill of $77.8 million.
4 Amounts include non-cash reductions of $2.6 million, $9.8 million, and $2.6 million related to the Company's tax equity solar investments in KRS II and Waihonu for each of the years ended December 31,2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
5


20.    REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS
2019 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company recorded chargesacquired 5 commercial real estate assets for $218.4 million that were accounted for as asset acquisitions. Such acquisitions were structured as like-kind exchanges in accordance with Internal Revenue Code §1031, using cash proceeds from the Agricultural Land Sale.
The allocation of $2.6 million for environmental costs relatedpurchase price to the management of a former quarry siteaggregate assets acquired and a net loss of $1.0 million related to the sales of vacant land parcels by an unconsolidated affiliate.
6 Costs related to the Company's in-depth evaluation of and conversion to a REIT.
7 The Company has completed a conversion process to complyliabilities assumed in connection with the requirements to be treated5 commercial real estate acquisitions in 2019 was as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing withfollows (in millions):
Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed  
Assets acquired:  
Land $106.9
Property and improvements 91.3
In-place leases 23.2
Favorable leases 4.3
Total assets acquired $225.7
   
Liabilities assumed:  
Unfavorable leases $7.3
Total liabilities assumed 7.3
Net assets acquired $218.4

As of the taxable year ended December 31, 2017. As a result,acquisition date, the income tax provision forweighted-average amortization periods of the in-place and favorable leases were approximately 8.2 years and 4.7 years, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period of the unfavorable leases was approximately 18.6 years.
2018 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 20172018, the Company acquired 5 commercial real estate assets for an aggregate purchase price of $303.7 million that were accounted for as asset acquisitions. The acquisitions were largely funded through cash using §1031 proceeds from the sale of the Company's last 7 mainland properties and also from the Agricultural Land Sale. The aggregate purchase price also included a $223mortgage loan with a contractual principal amount of $62.0 million deferred tax benefit related to the de-recognitionthat is secured by one of the deferred taxproperties and $2.7 million of capitalized and acquisition-related costs paid to third parties.
The allocation of purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities associated with the entities included in the REIT. The income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2016 also included non-cash reductions in the carrying value of A&B’s KRS II and Waihonu joint venture solar investments. Tax benefits associated with the KRS II and Waihonu investments are included in the Income tax expense line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
8 Amounts in 2017 represent the sales of one office building in Maui, Hawai`i in January 2017 and one industrial property in California in November 2017. Amounts in 2016 represent the sales of two California properties and one Utah office property in June 2016. Amounts in 2015 represent the sales of one Colorado retail property in March 2015, one Texas office building in May 2015, and one Washington office building in December 2015.




100



 2017 2016 2015
Identifiable Assets:     
Commercial Real Estate$1,128.1
 $1,119.5
 $1,075.7
Land Operations9
604.2
 632.8
 759.7
Materials & Construction379.2
 371.8
 386.6
Other119.7
 32.2
 20.3
Total assets$2,231.2
 $2,156.3
 $2,242.3
      
Capital Expenditures:     
Commercial Real Estate10
$32.8
 $98.7
 $23.0
Land Operations11,12
1.4
 5.3
 2.1
Materials & Construction6.3
 9.3
 7.2
Other0.2
 0.3
 1.4
Total capital expenditures$40.7
 $113.6
 $33.7
      
Depreciation and Amortization:     
Commercial Real Estate$26.0
 $28.4
 $28.9
Land Operations12
1.6
 6.7
 1.3
Materials & Construction12.2
 11.7
 11.6
Other1.6
 1.8
 1.5
Total depreciation and amortization$41.4
 $48.6
 $43.3
9
The Land Operations segment includes approximately $369.9 million, $357.5 million, and $379.7 million related to its investment in various real estate joint ventures as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
10
Represents gross capital additions to the commercial real estate portfolio, including gross tax-deferred property purchases, but excluding the assumption of debt, that are reflected as non-cash transactions in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
11
Excludes expenditures for real estate developments held for sale, which are classified as Cash Flows from Operating Activities within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and excludes investment in joint ventures classified as Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Operating cash flows for expenditures related to real estate developments were $20.8 million, $15.3 million, and $7.2 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Investments in real estate joint ventures were $16.4 million, $20.8 million, and $25.8 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Excludes expenditures from discontinued operations, which are classified as Cash Flows from Investing Activities within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of $1.8 million, $2.5 million, and $11.0 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
12
Amounts recast to reflect discontinued operations.

101





Unaudited quarterly segment results for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016assumed were as follows (in millions):
 2017

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenue:       
Commercial Real Estate$33.7
 $33.8
 $33.9
 $35.5
Land Operations11.0
 12.1
 22.6
 38.8
Materials & Construction48.5
 52.2
 55.0
 48.4
Total revenue93.2
 98.1
 111.5
 122.7
Operating Profit (Loss):       
Commercial Real Estate1,2
14.3
 13.4
 13.6
 (6.9)
Land Operations3
(2.4) 1.7
 10.4
 4.5
Materials & Construction4
5.6
 6.7
 6.7
 3.0
Total operating profit17.5
 21.8
 30.7
 0.6
Interest expense(6.2) (6.2) (6.1) (7.1)
General corporate expenses(5.7) (5.9) (8.9) (8.7)
REIT evaluation/conversion costs5
(4.8) (2.2) (4.4) (3.8)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Net Gain on Sale of Improved Properties0.8
 7.5
 11.3
 (19.0)
Income tax benefit (expense)6
0.8
 (3.5) (3.7) 224.6
Income from Continuing Operations Before Net Gain on Sale of Improved Properties1.6
 4.0
 7.6
 205.6
Net gain on the sale of improved properties7
3.0
 
 
 6.3
Income from Continuing Operations4.6
 4.0
 7.6
 211.9
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes2.4
 0.8
 (0.8) 
Net Income7.0
 4.8
 6.8
 211.9
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest(0.7) (0.5) (0.7) (0.3)
Net Income Attributable to A&B Shareholders$6.3
 $4.3
 $6.1
 $211.6
        
Amounts Available to A&B Shareholders:       
Income from Continuing Operations, Net of Taxes$4.6
 $4.0
 $7.6
 $211.9
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests(0.7) (0.5) (0.7) (0.3)
Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to A&B Shareholders, Net of Taxes3.9
 3.5
 6.9
 211.6
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interest0.5
 0.2
 0.5
 0.6
Income from Continuing Operations Available to A&B Shareholders, Net of Taxes4.4
 3.7
 7.4
 212.2
Income from discontinuing operations2.4
 0.8
 (0.8) 
Net Income Available to A&B Shareholders$6.8
 $4.5
 $6.6
 $212.2
Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed  
Assets acquired:  
Land $92.8
Property and improvements 173.9
In-place leases 32.0
Favorable leases 6.7
Total assets acquired $305.4
   
Liabilities assumed:  
Unfavorable leases $2.7
Notes payable and other debt1
 $61.0
Total liabilities assumed 63.7
Net assets acquired $241.7

1Includes a fair value adjustment of $1.0 million.

As of the acquisition date, the weighted-average amortization periods of the in-place and favorable leases were approximately 12.4 years and 11.7 years, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period of the unfavorable leases was approximately 11.5 years.
102





21.    AGRICULTURAL LAND SALE
  2017
 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Available to A&B Shareholders:       
 Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:       
 Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders
$0.09
 $0.08
 $0.15
 $4.31
 Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders
0.05
 0.02
 (0.02) 
 Net income available to A&B shareholders
$0.14
 $0.10
 $0.13
 $4.31
 Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:
       
 Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders
$0.09
 $0.07
 $0.15
 $3.42
 Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders
0.05
 0.02
 (0.02) 
 Net income available to A&B shareholders
$0.14
 $0.09
 $0.13
 $3.42
         
Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding:
       
 Basic49.1
 49.2
 49.2
 49.2
 
Diluted8
49.6
 49.6
 49.6
 62.0


103



 2016

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenue:       
Commercial Real Estate$34.8
 $34.5
 $32.7
 $32.7
Land Operations6.0
 5.5
 18.1
 32.3
Materials & Construction50.6
 42.0
 52.1
 46.2
Total revenue91.4
 82.0
 102.9
 111.2
Operating Profit (Loss):       
Commercial Real Estate1,2
14.2
 13.6
 13.5
 13.5
Land Operations3
(4.3) (10.4) 7.8
 13.9
Materials & Construction4
8.0
 4.9
 5.6
 4.8
Total operating profit17.9
 8.1
 26.9
 32.2
Interest expense(6.9) (6.8) (6.4) (6.2)
General corporate expenses(6.9) (4.0) (5.5) (5.7)
REIT evaluation/conversion costs5

 (1.9) (1.9) (5.7)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Net Gain on Sale of Improved Properties4.1
 (4.6) 13.1
 14.6
Income tax benefit (expense)6
(0.3) 2.8
 (1.0) (1.0)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Net Gain on Sale of Improved Properties3.8
 (1.8) 12.1
 13.6
Net gain on the sale of improved properties, net of income taxes7

 4.9
 0.1
 
Income From Continuing Operations3.8
 3.1
 12.2
 13.6
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(10.8) (3.7) (13.6) (13.0)
Net Income (Loss)(7.0) (0.6) (1.4) 0.6
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest(0.5) (0.1) (0.5) (0.7)
Net Loss Attributable to A&B$(7.5) $(0.7) $(1.9) $(0.1)

       
Amounts Available to A&B Shareholders:       
Income from Continuing Operations, Net of Taxes$3.8
 $3.1
 $12.2
 $13.6
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests(0.5) (0.1) (0.5) (0.7)
Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to A&B Shareholders, Net of Taxes3.3
 3.0
 11.7
 12.9
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interest0.4
 0.1
 0.4
 0.4
Income from Continuing Operations Available to A&B Shareholders, Net of Taxes3.7
 3.1
 12.1
 13.3
Income from discontinuing operations(10.8) (3.7) (13.6) (13.0)
Net Income (Loss) Available to A&B Shareholders$(7.1) $(0.6) $(1.5) $0.3


104



  2016
 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Available to A&B Shareholders:       
 Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:       
 Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders
$0.08
 $0.06
 $0.25
 $0.27
 Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders
(0.23) (0.07) (0.28) (0.26)
 Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders
$(0.15) $(0.01) $(0.03) $0.01
 Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock:
       
 Continuing operations available to A&B shareholders
$0.08
 $0.06
 $0.24
 $0.27
 Discontinued operations available to A&B shareholders
(0.22) (0.07) (0.28) (0.26)
 Net income (loss) available to A&B shareholders
$(0.14) $(0.01) $(0.04) $0.01
         
Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding:
       
 Basic48.9
 49.0
 49.0
 49.0
 Diluted49.3
 49.4
 49.4
 49.4
1
Commercial Real Estate operating profit includes intersegment operating revenue, primarily from our Materials & Construction segment, and is eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.
2
Commercial Real Estate operating profit includes $22.4 million of impairments of real estate for three mainland properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017.
3
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company recorded $11.7 million of non-cash impairment charges related to certain non-active, long-term development projects.
4
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded charges of $2.6 million for environmental costs related to the management of a former quarry site, a gain of $0.6 million on the sale of a vacant non-core land parcel in the fourth quarter of 2016, and a loss of $1.6 million related to the sale of vacant non-core land parcel by an unconsolidated affiliate in the third quarter of 2016.
5
Costs related to the Company's in-depth evaluation of a REIT conversion.
6
The Company has completed a conversion process to comply with the requirements to be treated as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2017. As a result, the income tax provision for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 included a $223 million deferred tax benefit related to the de-recognition of the deferred tax assets and liabilities associated with the entities included in the REIT. The income tax provision for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 included non-cash reductions in the carrying value of A&B’s KRS II and Waihonu joint venture solar investments. Tax benefits associated with the KRS II and Waihonu investments are included in the Income tax expense line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
7
Amounts in 2017 represent the sales of one office building in Maui, Hawai`i in January 2017 and one industrial property in California in November 2017. Amounts in 2016 represent the sales of two California and one Utah office properties in June 2016. Amounts in 2015 represent the sales of one Colorado retail property in March 2015, one Texas office building in May 2015, and one Washington office building in December 2015.
8On November 16, 2017,December 17, 2018, A&B entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions (the "PSA") with Mahi Pono (the "Buyer") related to the Company declared the Special Distribution on its shares of common stock in an aggregate amount of $783.0 million, or approximately $15.92 per share. The Company paid the Special Distribution on January 23, 2018. The Special Distribution was payableAgricultural Land Sale, which resulted in the formsale of cashapproximately 41,000 acres of Maui agricultural land and shares100% of the Company's stock at the electionownership interest in Central Maui Feedstocks LLC and Kulolio Ranch LLC in exchange for cash consideration of each shareholder,approximately $261.6 million, less customary closing costs and fees, subject to an aggregate limitcertain contingencies and reserves of $156.6approximately $19.5 million. The Agricultural Land Sale closed on December 20, 2018, with the exception of approximately 800 acres that were delivered to the Buyer in February 2019. In connection with the Agricultural Land Sale, the Company recognized gross profit of approximately $162.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, and $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company also deferred approximately $62.0 million of cash (the "Shareholder Election"). Asrevenue related to certain performance obligations involving securing adequate water to support the deadlineBuyer's agricultural plans for the common shareholders' election was January 12, 2018, subsequentland, through an agreement with the State of Hawai‘i to provide rights to access state water for agricultural irrigation (“State Water Lease”), as well as ensuring that the Buyer has continued access to water prior to the issuance of the State Water Lease. Under the terms of the PSA, the Company may be required to remit amounts up to $62.0 millionto the Buyer to the extent performance obligations are not met (recorded as deferred revenue of $62.0 million as of December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018).
The Agricultural Land Sale was deemed an asset sale and represents normal recurring activity for the total Special DistributionLand Operations segment. Revenue and the cost of $783 million was included the land sold were presented within Operating Revenue: Land Operations and Cost of Land Operations, respectively,in the computationaccompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The disposition of the Agricultural Land Sale did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since the disposition did not represent a strategic shift in the Company’s operations. Accordingly, the operating results of the assets are reflected in the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented through the date of disposition.
In addition to the Agricultural Land Sale, in February 2019, the Company sold 50% of its interest in East Maui Irrigation Company, LLC ("EMI") to the Buyer in exchange for cash proceeds of $2.7 million and concurrently entered into a joint venture operating agreement that governs the operation and management of EMI.
22.    GOODWILL
The Company's goodwill balance as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $15.4 million and $65.1 million, respectively, and is attributable to the 3 reporting units in the M&C segment - GPC (primarily consisting of the Grace Pacific’s quarry, paving, and liquid asphalt operations), GPRS (primarily consisting of Grace Pacific’s roadway and maintenance solutions operations) and GPRM (primarily consisting of Grace Pacific’s prestressed and precast concrete operations) - and the CRE reporting unit, which is also a reportable segment.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (for each period a consolidated balance sheet is presented) allocated to the Company's reportable segments starting with the year ended December 31, 2018 and continuing to the year ended December 31, 2019 were as follows (in millions):
 2018 2019
 Materials & Construction Commercial Real Estate Total Materials & Construction Commercial Real Estate Total
Balance, beginning of year           
Gross amount of goodwill$93.6
 $8.7
 $102.3
 $93.6
 $8.7
 $102.3
Accumulated impairment losses
 
 
 (37.2) 
 (37.2)
 93.6
 8.7
 102.3
 56.4
 8.7
 65.1
            
Impairment losses(37.2) 
 (37.2) (49.7) 
 (49.7)
            
Balance, end of year           
Gross amount of goodwill93.6
 8.7
 102.3
 93.6
 8.7
 102.3
Accumulated impairment losses(37.2) 
 (37.2) (86.9) 
 (86.9)
 $56.4
 $8.7
 $65.1
 $6.7
 $8.7
 $15.4



There is no goodwill related to the Land Operations segment.
Goodwill impairment: The goodwill impairment test estimates the fair value of a reporting unit using various methodologies, including an income approach that is based on a discounted cash flow analysis and a market approach that involves the application of market-derived multiples. Valuations performed in conjunction with the Company's goodwill impairment tests for each reporting unit assumes that each is an unrelated business to be sold separately and independently from the other reporting units.
The discounted cash flow approach relies on a number of assumptions, including future macroeconomic conditions, market factors specific to the reporting unit, the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the business over an extended period of time and a discount rate that considers the risks related to the amount and timing of the cash flows, among others. Under the market multiple methodology, the estimate of fair value is based on market multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) or revenues. When using market multiples of EBITDA or revenues, the Company must make judgments about the comparability of those multiples in closed and proposed transactions and comparability of multiples for similar companies.
If the results of the Company's diluted earnings (loss) per share.test indicates that a reporting unit's estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

Based on the results of the valuation performed in conjunction with the Company's annual goodwill impairment test in 2018, the carrying amounts of the GPC and GPRS reporting units exceeded their estimated fair values and goodwill was determined to be impaired. The decline in fair value was due primarily to persisting, competitive market pressures that negatively affected sales and margins. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $37.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2018.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, the Company was required to perform an interim impairment test for the goodwill in each of its 3 M&C reporting units due to the continued decline in M&C sales and margins in 2019, which resulted from continued, adverse market conditions. Based on the results of the valuation performed in conjunction with this test, the carrying amounts of the 3 M&C reporting units exceeded their estimated fair values and goodwill was determined to be impaired. As a result, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $49.7 million during the third quarter of 2019.
105The Company's goodwill and impairment test estimated the fair value of the M&C reporting units using various methodologies, including a market approach that involves the application of market-derived multiples and an income approach that was based on a discounted cash flow analysis. The Company classified these fair value measurements as Level 3. The weighted-average discount rate used in the 2018 valuation and 2019 valuation was 13.6% and 12.7%, respectively.



20.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 23, 2018, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (the “Company”) acquired a portfolio of commercial properties in Hawai`i (the "Portfolio") for a total consideration of $254.1 million, including assumed debt of $62.0 million. The Portfolio consists of three grocery-anchored shopping centers: (1) Laulani Village Shopping Center located in Ewa Beach, Oahu, (2) Hokulei Village Shopping Center located in Lihue, Kauai, and (3) Pu`unene Shopping Center located in Kahului, Maui. The Portfolio adds approximately 390,000 of gross leasable area to the Company’s Commercial Real Estate portfolio.

The acquisition of the Portfolio was funded through proceeds from the sale of U.S. Mainland commercial properties via tax-deferred §1031 exchanges, the assumption of a $62.0 million promissory note (“Promissory Note”), and borrowings under the Company’s revolving senior credit facility at the time of closing.

The Promissory Note bears interest at 3.93 percent and requires monthly interest payments of approximately $0.2 million until May 2020 and principal and interest payments of approximately $0.3 million thereafter. The Promissory Note matures on May 1, 2024 and is secured by the Laulani Village Shopping Center.

23.    SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On February 26, 2018,13, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Associationto execute a pay-fixed, receive variable interest rate swap with a notional amount of $50.0 million and monthly payments through February 27, 2023 to fix the variable interest component on the Company's existing debt at an effective rate of 1.35%.
On February 25, 2020, the Company's Board of Directors declared a syndicatecash dividend of other financial institutions that provides for a $50 million term loan facility (“Wells Fargo Term Facility”). The Company also drew $50 million under the Wells Fargo Term Facility$0.19 per share of outstanding common stock, payable on February 26, 2018 and used such term loan proceedsMarch 24, 2020 to repay amounts that were borrowed under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility to fund the acquisitionshareholders of record as of the Portfolio. Borrowings under the Wells Fargo Term Facility bear interest at a stated rate, as defined, plus a margin that is determined basedclose of business on a pricing grid using the ratio of debt to total assets ratio, as defined.March 9, 2020.




106





24.    UNAUDITED SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY INFORMATION
Unaudited quarterly results for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):
 2019
 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenue$129.4
 $109.1
 $89.1
 $107.6
Total Operating Profit (Loss)$23.7
 $13.2
 $(37.1) $18.0
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes$8.4
 $(1.3) $(50.8) $4.8
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders$9.0
 $(0.8) $(49.8) $5.2
        
Net Income (loss) Available to A&B shareholders$9.0
 $(0.8) $(49.8) $5.0
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share$0.12
 $(0.01) $(0.69) $0.07
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share$0.12
 $(0.01) $(0.69) $0.07
        
Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding:       
Basic72.1
 72.2
 72.3
 72.3
Diluted72.5
 72.2
 72.3
 72.5
 2018
 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenue$113.3
 $112.1
 $119.4
 $299.6
Total Operating Profit (Loss)$10.3
 $18.8
 $32.4
 $(102.9)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes$44.8
 $2.8
 $16.8
 $(117.3)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to A&B Shareholders$47.3
 $2.5
 $14.8
 $(136.6)
        
Net Income (loss) Available to A&B shareholders$47.3
 $2.5
 $14.8
 $(136.6)
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share$0.71
 $0.03
 $0.21
 $(1.90)
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share$0.66
 $0.03
 $0.20
 $(1.90)
        
Weighted-Average Number of Shares Outstanding:       
Basic66.4
 72.0
 72.0
 72.0
Diluted72.2
 72.3
 72.4
 72.0


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’sCompany's management, with the participation of the Company’sCompany's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’sCompany's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b)Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Company's fiscal fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
(a)    

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. has the responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’sCompany’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’sCompany’s board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the company;Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the companyCompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;Company; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’sCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting only provides reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement presentation and preparation and cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, will be detected. Management does not expect that the Company’s internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. Additionally, the design of a control system must consider the benefits of the controls relative to their costs. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on its assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2017,2019, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. That report appears below.

107




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, of the Company and our report dated March 1, 2018,February 27, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Honolulu, HawaiiHawai‘i
March 1, 2018

108



(c)    Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Company's fiscal fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.February 27, 2020
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
A.Directors
For information about the directors of A&B, see the section captioned “Election of Directors” in A&B’s proxy statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“A&B’s 20182020 Proxy Statement”), which section is incorporated herein by reference.
B.Executive Officers
As of February 15, 2018,2020, the name of each executive officer of A&B (in alphabetical order), age (in parentheses), and present and prior positions with A&B and business experience for the past five years are given below.
Generally, the term of office of executive officers is at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. For a discussion of compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act by A&B’s directors and executive officers, see the subsection captioned “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in A&B’s 2018 Proxy Statement, which subsection is incorporated herein by reference. For a discussion of change in control agreements between A&B and certain of A&B’s executive officers, and the Executive Severance Plan, see the subsections captioned “Other Potential Post-Employment Payments” in A&B’s 20182020 Proxy Statement, which subsections are incorporated herein by reference.
References within this section to A&B include the Company and Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. prior to the Holding Company Merger.Merger, which was completed on November 8, 2017 in order to facilitate the Company's conversion to a REIT. Also, references to “A&B Predecessor” are to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. prior to its separation from Matson, Inc. on June 29, 2012.
Christopher J. Benjamin (54)(56)
Chief Executive Officer of A&B, 1/16-present; President of A&B, 6/12-present; Chief Operating Officer of A&B, 6/12-12/15; President of Land Group of A&B Predecessor, 9/11-6/12; President of A & B Properties Hawai`i, LLC. ("ABP")Inc., 9/11-8/15; Senior Vice President of A&B Predecessor, 7/05-8/11; Chief Financial Officer of A&B Predecessor, 2/04-8/11; Treasurer of A&B Predecessor, 5/06-8/11; Plantation General Manager, Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company, 3/09-3/11; first joined A&B Predecessor in 2001.
Brett A. Brown (55)
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of A&B, 5/19-present; Treasurer of A&B, 8/19-present; Chief Financial Officer of PREP Property Group, 2/18-5/19; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of IRC Retail Centers/Inland Real Estate Corporation, 8/11-7/17.
Meredith J. Ching (61)(63)
Executive Vice President, External Affairs, of A&B, 3/18-present; Senior Vice President, External Affairs, of A&B, 6/12-present;12-3/18; Senior Vice President, (GovernmentGovernment & Community Relations)Relations, of A&B Predecessor, 6/07-6/12; first joined A&B Predecessor in 1982.
Clayton K. Y. Chun (40)(42)
Senior Vice President of A&B, 2/19-present; Chief Accounting Officer of A&B, 1/18-present; Vice President of A&B, 3/18-1/19; Controller of A&B, 9/15-present; Audit Senior Manager of Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 9/00-8/15.
Nelson N. S. Chun (65)(67)
SeniorExecutive Vice President andof A&B, 3/18-present; Chief Legal Officer of A&B, 6/12-present; Senior Vice President of A&B, 6/12-3/18; Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of A&B Predecessor, 7/05-6/12; first joined A&B Predecessor in 2003.

Lance K. Parker (46)
109



James E. Mead (58)
Chief Financial OfficerExecutive Vice President of A&B, 7/17-present; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of SL Green Realty Corp., 11/10-1/15.
Lance K. Parker (44)
Senior Vice President and3/18-present; Chief Real Estate Officer of A&B, 10/17-present; President of ABP,A&B Properties Hawai‘i, LLC ("ABP"), 9/15-present; Senior Vice President of ABP, 6/13-8/15; Vice President of ABP, 7/07-6/13; first joined A&B Predecessor in 2004.

C.Corporate Governance
For information about the Audit Committee of the A&B Board of Directors, see the section captioned “Certain Information Concerning the Board of Directors” in A&B’s 20182020 Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
D.Code of Ethics
For information about A&B’s Code of Ethics, see the subsection captioned “Code of Ethics” in A&B’s 20182020 Proxy Statement, which subsection is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
See the section captioned “Executive Compensation” and the subsection captioned “Compensation of Directors” in A&B’s 20182020 Proxy Statement, which section and subsection are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
See the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Shareholders” and the subsection titled “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” in A&B’s 20182020 Proxy Statement, which section and subsection are incorporated herein by reference. See the Equity Compensation Plan Information table in Item 5 of Part II.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
See the section captioned “Election of Directors” and the subsection captioned “Certain Relationships and Transactions” in A&B’s 20182020 Proxy Statement, which section and subsection are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services appears in the section captioned “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in A&B’s 20182020 Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
A.    Financial Statements
The financial statements are set forth in Item 8 of Part II above.

110




B.    Financial Statement Schedules

SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
December 31, 20172019
 (in millions) Initial CostCosts Capitalized Subsequent to AcquisitionGross Amounts of Which Carried at Close of Period   
DescriptionEncum-
brances (1)
LandBuildings
and
Improvements
ImprovementsCarrying CostsLandBuildings
and
Improvements
Total (2)Accumulated
Depreciation  (3)
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired/
Completed
Commercial Real Estate Segment           
Industrial :           
Honokohau Industrial (HI)$
$4.9
$4.8
$
$
$4.9
$4.8
$9.7
$(0.1)Various2017
Kailua Industrial/Other (HI)
10.5
2.0
0.1

10.5
2.1
12.6
(0.3)Various2013
Kaka'ako Commerce Center (HI)
16.9
20.6
1.2

16.9
21.8
38.7
(1.6)19692014
Komohana Industrial Park (HI)
25.2
10.8
0.6

25.2
11.4
36.6
(2.3)19902010
P&L Warehouse (HI)


1.2


1.2
1.2
(0.7)19701970
Port Allen (HI)

0.7
2.4


3.1
3.1
(2.0)1983, 19931983-1993
Sparks Business Center (NV)
3.2
17.2
3.3

3.2
20.5
23.7
(8.9)1996-19982002
Waipio Industrial (HI)
19.6
7.7
0.1

19.6
7.8
27.4
(1.9)1988-19892009
            
Office :           
1800 and 1820 Preston Park (TX) (4)
4.5
19.9
7.5
(0.5)4.5
26.9
31.4
(8.6)1997, 19982006
Concorde Commerce Center (AZ) (4)
3.9
20.9
6.3
(12.9)3.9
14.3
18.2
(9.0)19982006
Deer Valley Financial Center (AZ) (4)
3.4
19.2
5.4
(5.4)3.4
19.2
22.6
(8.5)20012005
Judd Building (HI)
1.0
2.1
2.3

1.0
4.4
5.4
(1.9)1898, 19792000
Kahului Office Building (HI)
1.0
0.4
6.9

1.0
7.3
8.3
(8.0)19741989
Kahului Office Center (HI)


5.7


5.7
5.7
(4.1)19911991
Lono Center (HI)

1.4
1.2


2.6
2.6
(1.5)19731991
Gateway at Mililani Mauka South (HI)
7.0
3.5
5.8

7.0
9.3
16.3
(0.8)1992, 20062012
Stangenwald Building (HI)
1.8
1.0
1.4

1.8
2.4
4.2
(1.1)1901, 19801996
            
Retail :           
Aikahi Park Shopping Center (HI)
23.5
6.7
0.5

23.5
7.2
30.7
(1.3)19712015
Gateway at Mililani Mauka (HI)
7.3
4.7
5.7

7.3
10.4
17.7
(1.1)2008, 20132011
Kahului Shopping Center (HI)


2.3


2.3
2.3
(1.3)19511951
Kailua Retail Other (HI)15.7
84.0
73.8
6.8

84.0
80.6
164.6
(9.3)Various2013
Kaneohe Bay Shopping Ctr. (HI)

13.4
2.2


15.6
15.6
(6.3)19712001
Kunia Shopping Center (HI)
2.7
10.6
1.4

2.7
12.0
14.7
(4.5)20042002
Lahaina Square (HI)
4.6
3.7
2.7

4.6
6.4
11.0
(0.8)19732010
Lanihau Marketplace (HI)
9.4
13.2
2.1

9.4
15.3
24.7
(3.1)19872010
Little Cottonwood Center (UT)
12.2
9.1
1.4

12.2
10.5
22.7
(2.2)1998, 20082010
Manoa Marketplace (HI)60.0
43.3
35.9
1.2

43.3
37.1
80.4
(2.2)19772016
Napili Plaza (HI)
9.4
8.0
0.6

9.4
8.6
18.0
(1.5)19912003, 2013
Pearl Highlands Center (HI)87.0
43.4
96.2
7.9

43.4
104.1
147.5
(13.2)1992-19942013
Port Allen Marina Ctr. (HI)

3.4
1.1


4.5
4.5
(2.2)20021971
Royal MacArthur Center (TX)
3.5
10.1
2.7

3.5
12.8
16.3
(3.7)20062007
The Shops at Kukui'ula (HI)
8.9
30.1
3.5

8.9
33.6
42.5
(4.1)20092013
Waianae Mall (HI)
17.4
10.1
4.3

17.4
14.4
31.8
(2.1)19752013
Waipio Shopping Center (HI)
24.0
7.6
0.7

24.0
8.3
32.3
(1.8)1986, 20042009
            
Other :           
Ho'okele Shopping Center (HI)


5.5


5.5
5.5

2017 
Oahu Ground Leases (HI)
170.5
0.6


170.5
0.6
171.1
(0.1) 2013
Other miscellaneous investments
2.6
0.1
18.5

2.6
18.6
21.2
(7.7)  
            
Total$162.7
$569.6
$469.5
$122.5
$(18.8)$569.6
$573.2
$1,142.8
$(129.8)  
            
Total for Hawai`i$162.7
$538.9
$373.1
$95.9
$
$538.9
$469.0
$1,007.9
$(88.9)  
Total for U.S. Mainland
30.7
96.4
26.6
(18.8)30.7
104.2
134.9
(40.9)  
Total$162.7
$569.6
$469.5
$122.5
$(18.8)$569.6
$573.2
$1,142.8
$(129.8)  


111


(in millions)  Initial CostCosts Capitalized Subsequent to AcquisitionGross Amounts of Which Carried at Close of Period   
Description Encum-
brances (1)
LandBuildings
and
Improvements
ImprovementsCarrying CostsLandBuildings
and
Improvements
Total (2)Accumulated
Depreciation  (3)
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired/
Completed
Commercial Real Estate Segment            
Industrial :            
Kapolei Enterprise Center (HI) $
$7.9
$16.8
$0.8
$
$7.9
$17.5
$25.4
$(0.4)20192019
Harbor Industrial (HI) 


1.2


1.2
1.2
(1.1)19302018
Honokohau Industrial (HI) 
5.0
4.8
0.1

5.0
4.9
9.9
(0.4)Various2017
Kailua Industrial/Other (HI) 
10.5
2.0
0.5

10.5
2.5
13.0
(0.4)Various2013
Kakaako Commerce Center (HI) 
16.9
20.6
1.8

16.9
22.4
39.3
(2.8)19692014
Komohana Industrial Park (HI) 
25.2
10.8
1.0

25.2
11.8
37.0
(3.0)19902010
Opule Industrial (HI) 
10.9
27.1


10.9
27.1
38.0
(0.7)2005-2006, 20182018
P&L Warehouse (HI) 


1.2


1.2
1.2
(0.8)19701970
Port Allen (HI) 

0.7
2.4


3.1
3.1
(2.2)1983, 19931983-1993
Waipio Industrial (HI) 
19.6
7.7
0.5

19.6
8.1
27.7
(2.3)1988-19892009
             
Office :            
Kahului Office Building (HI) 
1.0
0.4
7.4

1.0
7.8
8.8
(8.3)19741989
Kahului Office Center (HI) 


5.2


5.2
5.2
(3.7)19911991
Lono Center (HI) 

1.4
1.2


2.6
2.6
(1.6)19731991
Gateway at Mililani Mauka South (HI) 
7.0
3.5
5.1

5.5
10.1
15.6
(1.3)1992, 20062012
             
Retail :            
Aikahi Park Shopping Center (HI) 
23.5
6.7
1.8

23.5
8.7
32.2
(2.1)19712015
Gateway at Mililani Mauka (HI) 
7.3
4.7
6.4

7.8
10.5
18.3
(1.7)2008, 20132011
Hokulei Street (HI) 
16.9
36.5
2.7

16.9
39.2
56.1
(2.3)20152018
Kahului Shopping Center (HI) 


3.1


3.1
3.1
(1.7)19511951
Kailua Retail Other (HI) 14.8
84.0
73.8
12.1

84.7
85.3
170.0
(14.7)Various2013
Kaneohe Bay Shopping Ctr. (HI) 

13.4
2.7

0.4
15.8
16.2
(7.2)19712001
Kunia Shopping Center (HI) 
2.7
10.6
2.1

3.0
12.4
15.4
(5.2)20042002
Lanihau Marketplace (HI) 
9.4
13.2
2.4

9.4
15.6
25.0
(4.2)19872010
Laulani Village (HI) 62.0
43.4
64.3
2.9

43.4
67.3
110.7
(3.9)20122018
Manoa Marketplace (HI) 59.5
43.3
35.9
4.8

45.0
38.9
83.9
(4.5)19772016
Napili Plaza (HI) 
9.4
8.0
0.6

9.5
8.6
18.1
(1.9)19912003, 2013
Pearl Highlands Center (HI) 83.4
43.4
96.2
13.1

43.4
109.3
152.7
(19.9)1992-19942013
Port Allen Marina Ctr. (HI) 

3.4
1.9


5.3
5.3
(2.4)20021971
The Collection (HI) 
2.3
4.5
1.7

2.3
6.2
8.5
(0.2)20172018
The Shops at Kukui'ula (HI) 
8.9
30.1
4.2

9.2
33.9
43.1
(6.5)20092013
Waianae Mall (HI) 
17.4
10.1
5.3

17.7
14.9
32.6
(3.1)19752013
Waipio Shopping Center (HI) 
24.0
7.6
1.5

24.0
9.1
33.1
(2.3)1986, 20042009
Lau Hala Shops (HI) 


37.8

14.5
23.2
37.7
(1.1)20182018
Hookele (HI) 


30.8

13.4
17.4
30.8
(0.4)20172019
Puunene Shopping Center (HI) 
24.8
28.6
6.8

24.8
35.4
60.2
(2.4)20172018
Queens' MarketPlace (HI) 
20.4
58.9
1.5

20.4
60.3
80.7
(1.2)20072019
Waipouli Town Center (HI) 
5.9
9.7
0.9

6.0
10.5
16.5
(0.3)19802019
             
Other :            
Oahu Ground Leases (HI) 
231.6
0.1


231.6
0.1
231.7

Other miscellaneous investments 
2.5
0.1
11.7

2.8
11.5
14.3
(7.1)
             
Total $219.7
$725.1
$612.2
$187.2
$
$756.2
$768.0
$1,524.2
$(125.3)  

Description (amounts in millions)Encum-
brances (1)
LandBuildings and ImprovementsImprovementsCarrying CostsLandBuildings and ImprovementsTotal (2)Accumulated
Depreciation  (3)
Land Operations Segment       
Agricultural Land$
$9.7
$
$
$
$9.7
$
$9.7
$
Aina ‘O Kane


1.2


1.2
$1.2

Brydeswood


0.6


0.6
$0.6

Grove Ranch


1.5


1.5
$1.5

Haliimaile


0.8


0.8
$0.8

Kahala Portfolio
34.4



34.4

$34.4

Kamalani


26.5


26.5
$26.5

Maui Business Park II


38.3


38.3
$38.3

The Ridge at Wailea (MF-19)
1.7

6.2

1.7
6.2
$7.9

Waiale Community


1.8


1.8
$1.8

Wailea B-1
4.6



4.6

$4.6

Wailea B-II
3.3



3.3

$3.3

Wailea MF-7
2.9

5.9

2.9
5.9
$8.8

Wailea SF-S
4.0



4.0

$4.0

Wailea SF-8
1.3



1.3

$1.3

Wailea, other
15.3

8.3

15.3
8.3
$23.6

Other Kauai landholdings

0.1
13.4
(9.1)
4.4
$4.4
(0.6)
 Other Maui Landholdings
0.2
0.2
1.4

0.2
1.6
$1.8
(0.7)
Other miscellaneous investments
3.1
1.1
6.1
(2.5)3.1
4.7
$7.8
(2.4)
Total$
$80.5
$1.4
$112.0
$(11.6)$80.5
$101.8
$182.3
$(3.7)

Description (amounts in millions) Encum-
brances (1)
LandBuildings and ImprovementsImprovementsCarrying CostsLandBuildings and ImprovementsTotal (2)Accumulated
Depreciation  (3)
Land Operations Segment       
Agricultural Land $
$11.0
$
$0.3
$
$11.0
$0.3
$11.3
$
Kahala Portfolio 








Kamalani 


5.0


5.0
5.0

Kauai Landholdings 

0.1
5.6


5.7
5.7
(0.7)
Maui Business Park II 


31.9


31.9
31.9

Maui Landholdings 
0.1
0.2
6.0

0.1
6.2
6.3
(0.7)
Wailea B-1 
4.6



4.6

4.6

Wailea, other 
19.9

8.5
(0.5)19.9
8.0
27.9

Other miscellaneous investments 
1.6

0.8

1.6
0.8
2.4
(0.8)
Total $
$37.2
$0.3
$58.1
$(0.5)$37.2
$57.9
$95.1
$(2.2)
(1)See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2)
The aggregate tax basis, as ofat December 31, 2017,2019, for the Commercial Real Estate segment and Land Operations segment assets was approximately$633.3 $698.6 million, including outside tax basis of consolidated joint venture investments.
(3)Depreciation is computed based upon the following estimated useful lives:
Building and improvements:    10 – 40 years
Leasehold improvements:    5 – 10 years (lesser of useful life or lease term)
Other property improvements:    3 – 35 years
(4)
During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.5 million, $12.9 million, and $5.4 million for 1800 and 1820 Preston Park, Concorde Commerce Center, and Deer Valley Financial Center, respectively. See Note 2 "Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information.
Reconciliation of Real Estate (in millions)2017 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017
Balance at beginning of year$1,352.7
 $1,332.5
 $1,397.1
 $1,447.7
 $1,325.1
 $1,352.7
Additions and improvements57.8
 118.8
 32.2
 232.8
 317.8
 57.8
Dispositions, retirements and other adjustments(66.6) (87.0) (96.8) (61.2) (194.7) (66.6)
Impairment of real estate assets(18.8) (11.6) 
Impairment of assets 
 (0.5) (18.8)
Balance at end of year$1,325.1
 $1,352.7
 $1,332.5
 $1,619.3
 $1,447.7
 $1,325.1
Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation (in millions) 2019 2018 2017
Balance at beginning of year $107.6
 $133.5
 $122.7
Depreciation expense 24.3
 20.4
 18.8
Dispositions, retirements and other adjustments (4.4) (46.3) (8.0)
Balance at end of year $127.5
 $107.6
 $133.5

Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation (in millions)2017 2016 2015
Balance at beginning of year$122.7
 $128.0
 $120.5
Depreciation expense18.8
 20.2
 20.5
Dispositions, retirements and other adjustments(8.0) (25.5) (13.0)
Balance at end of year$133.5
 $122.7
 $128.0



112




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, and have issued our reports thereon dated March 1, 2018;February 27, 2020; such reports are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company listed in the Index at Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidatedthe financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Honolulu, HawaiiHawai‘i
March 1, 2018February 27, 2020


113




C.Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
Exhibits not filed herewith are incorporated by reference to the exhibit number and previous filing shown in parentheses. All previous exhibits were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. Exhibits filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 were filed under file number 001-34187. Shareholders may obtain copies of exhibits for a copying and handling charge of $0.15 per page by writing to Alyson J. Nakamura, Corporate Secretary, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., P. O. Box 3440, Honolulu, Hawai`Hawai‘i 96801.
2.    Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession.
2.a2.a.  Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 10, 2017, by and among Alexander & Baldwin, Investments, LLC (formerly Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (formerly Alexander & Baldwin REIT Holdings, Inc.) and A&B REIT Merger Corporation (Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K, dated July 12, 2017).
3.    Articles of incorporation and bylaws.
3.a3.a.  Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., effective as of November 8, 2017 (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).
3.b3.b.  Amended and Restated Bylaws of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., effective as of November 8, 2017 (Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).
4.    Instruments defining the rights of security holdersholders.
4.a4.a.  Description of Capital Stock (Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).
4.b4.b.  Form of Company Common Stock Certificate (Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).
4.c. Description of Registrant's Securities (Exhibit 4.c. to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).
10.    Material contracts.
10.a. (i)  Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Kukui`Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawai`i)(Hawaii), LLC, dated May 1, 2009, by and between KDC, LLC, a Hawai`iHawaii limited liability company, and DMB Kukui`Kukui‘ula LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 filed on May 21, 2012).
(ii)  First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Kukui`Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawai`i)(Hawaii), LLC, dated September 28, 2010, by and between KDC, LLC, a Hawai`iHawaii limited liability company, and DMB Kukui`Kukui‘ula LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 filed on May 21, 2012).
(iii)  Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Kukui`Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawai`i)(Hawaii), LLC, dated July 20, 2011, by and between KDC, LLC, a Hawai`iHawaii limited liability company, and DMB Kukui`Kukui‘ula LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 filed on May 21, 2012).
(iv)  General Contract of Indemnity, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), Kukui`Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawai`i)(Hawaii), LLC, DMB Kukui`Kukui‘ula LLC, and DMB Communities LLC, in favor of Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, dated June 13, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 8-K dated June 14, 2006 (File No. 000-00565)).
(v)  Mutual Indemnification Agreement, among Kukui`Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawai`i)(Hawaii), LLC, DMB Kukui`Kukui‘ula LLC, DMB Communities LLC, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), dated June 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 8-K dated June 14, 2006 (File No. 000-00565)).
(vi)  General Agreement of Indemnity, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), Kukui`Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawai`i)(Hawaii), LLC, and DMB Communities LLC, in favor of Safeco Insurance Company of America, dated August 30, 2006 and entered into September 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 8-K dated September 5, 2006 (File No. 000-00565)).
(vii)  Mutual Indemnification Agreement, among Kukui`Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawai`i)(Hawaii), LLC, DMB Kukui`Kukui‘ula LLC, DMB Communities LLC, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), dated

114



August 30, 2006 and entered into September 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 8-K dated September 5, 2006 (File No. 000-00565)).
(viii)  Credit Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), First Hawaiian Bank, Bank of America, N.A. and the other lenders party thereto, dated as of June 4, 2012 (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated June 4, 2012).
(ix)  First Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B II, LLC, Bank of America, N.A., and First Hawaiian Bank, dated December 18, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xvi) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).
(x)  Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M, Bank of America N.A., First Hawaiian Bank, and other lenders party thereto, dated September 15, 2017 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated September 19, 2017).
(xi)  Joinder Agreement, by Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., dated November 8, 2017, to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 15, 2017, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M, Bank of America, N.A., First Hawaiian Bank, and other lenders party thereto.thereto (Exhibit 10.a.(xi) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).
(xii)  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 10, 2015, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, Bank of America, N.A., and other lenders party thereto (Exhibit 10.a.(xvii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).
(xiii)  Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.), Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and the other purchasers party thereto, dated as of June 4, 2012 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated June 4, 2012).
(xiv)  Modification to Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and the other purchasers party thereto, dated as of September 27, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xviii) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013).
(xv)  Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., and certain affiliates of Prudential Investment Management, Inc., dated December 10, 2015 (Exhibit 10.a.(xx) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).
(xvi)  Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement by and among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., and certain affiliates of Prudential Investment Management, Inc., dated September 15, 2017 (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated September 19, 2017).
(xvii)  Joinder Agreement, by Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (formerly Alexander & Baldwin REIT Holdings, Inc.), dated November 8, 2017, to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement, dated December 10, 2015, as amended, between Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., and the other Guarantors party thereto, on the one hand, and the Purchasers party thereto, on the other hand.hand (Exhibit 10.a.(xvii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).
(xviii)  Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement, by and among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., and certain affiliates of Prudential Investment Management, Inc., dated January 8, 2018.2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xviii) to Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2017).
(xix)  Series J Senior Notes (No. J-1 through No. J-8) by Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated April 18, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xix) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).
(xx)  Series K Senior Notes (No. K-1 through No. K-8) by Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M in favor of The Prudential

Insurance Company of America, dated April 18, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xx) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).
(xxi)  Series L Senior Notes (No. L-1 through No. L-8) by Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, and Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series M in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated April 18, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxi) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).
(xxii)  Limited Guaranty among A & B Properties, Inc., First Hawaiian Bank, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Bank of Hawai`i,Hawaii, and Central Pacific Bank, dated as of November 30, 2012 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated December 4, 2012).
(xx)(xxiii)  Completion Guaranty among A & B Properties, Inc., First Hawaiian Bank, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Bank of Hawai`i,Hawaii, and Central Pacific Bank, dated as of November 30, 2012 (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated December 4, 2012).

115



(xxi)(xxiv)  Note and Mortgage Assumption Agreement, dated January 15, 2013, among U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-IQ11, TNP SRT Waianae Mall, LLC, and A&B Waianae LLC (Exhibit 10.a.(xx) to Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2012).
(xxii)(xxv)  Loan Assumption and Amendment to Loan Documents, among PHSC Holdings, LLC, ABP Pearl Highlands LLC, Pearl Highlands LLC, and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated September 17, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxii) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013).
(xxiii)(xxvi)  Promissory Note between ABP Pearl Highlands LLC and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated November 20, 2014 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated November 20,December 1, 2014).
(xxiv)(xxvii)  Mortgage and Security Agreement between ABP Pearl Highlands LLC and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated November 20, 2014 (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated November 20,December 1, 2014).
(xxv)(xxviii)  Term Loan Agreement among Kukui`Kukui‘ula Village LLC, Bank of America, N.A., and the other financial institutions party thereto, dated as of November 5, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxvi) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).
(xxvi)(xxix)  Real Estate Term Loan Agreement among Kukui`Kukui‘ula Village LLC, Kukui`Kukui‘ula Development Company (Hawai`i)(Hawaii), LLC, Bank of America, N.A., and the other financial institutions party thereto, dated as of November 5, 2013 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxv) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).
(xxvii)(xxx)  Promissory Note by ABL Manoa Marketplace LF LLC, A&B Manoa LLC, ABL Manoa Marketplace LH LLC, and ABP Manoa Marketplace LH LLC to First Hawaiian Bank, dated August 1, 2016 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxiv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016).
(xxviii)(xxxi)  Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by ABL Manoa Marketplace LF LLC, A&B Manoa LLC, ABL Manoa Marketplace LH LLC, and ABP Manoa Marketplace LH LLC to First Hawaiian Bank, dated August 1, 2016 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016).
(xxix)(xxxii)  Limited Liability Company Agreement of Alexander & Baldwin Investments, LLC, dated as of November 8, 2017 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated November 8, 2017).
(xxxiii)  Term Loan Agreement, among Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Grace Pacific LLC, the other borrowers party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and the other lenders party thereto, dated February 26, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxiii) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).
(xxxiv)  Promissory Note by TRC Laulani Village, LLC in favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated April 10, 2014 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxiv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).
(xxxv)  Loan Assumption and Amendment to Loan Documents, among TRC Laulani Village, LLC, ABP E1 LLC, ABP ER1 LLC, and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated February 23, 2018 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).
(xxxvi)  Purchase and Sale Agreement, among Hokulei Village, LLC, TRC Laulani Village, LLC, Laulani Village Pad G, LLC, and Puunene Shopping Center, LLC, on one hand, and A & B Properties Hawaii, LLC, Series R, on the other

hand, effective as of November 22, 2017, as amended (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxvi) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018).
(xxxvii)  Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions by Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series R, Alexander & Baldwin, LLC, Series T, and A & B Properties Hawaii, LLC, Series R, and Mahi Pono Holdings, LLC, dated December 17, 2018 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated December 20, 2018).
*10.b.1. (i)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 99.1 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(ii)  Amendment No. 1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, effective as of January 24, 2017 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(ii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016).
(iii)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, as assumed (Exhibit 99.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 filed on November 8, 2017).
(iv)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, as assumed on November 8, 2017, as further amended and restated effective January 23, 2018 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(iv) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018).
(v)  Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant (Exhibit 99.2 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(v)(vi)  Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executive Employees (Exhibit 99.4 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(vi)(vii)  Form of Notice of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant (Exhibit 10.b.1.(iv) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).

(viii) Form of Notice of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant (Exhibit 10.b.1(viii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).
(vii)(ix)  Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Executive Employees (Exhibit 10.b.1.(v) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).
(viii)(x)  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (Exhibit 99.8 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(ix)(xi)  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (Deferral Election) (Exhibit 99.9 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

116



(x)(xii)  Form of Notice of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant (Exhibit 99.10 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(xi)(xiii)  Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Executive Employees (Exhibit 99.12 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(xii)(xiv)  Form of Universal Stock Option Agreement for Substitute Options-Executive Officers (2007 Plan) (Exhibit 99.13 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(xiii)(xv)  Form of Universal Stock Option Agreement for Substitute Options (1998 Plan) (Exhibit 99.15 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(xiv)(xvi)  Form of Universal Stock Option Agreement for Substitute Options (1998 Non-employee Director Plan) (Exhibit 99.16 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(xv)(xvii)  Form of Universal Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Substitute Awards-Executive Officer (2007 Plan) (Exhibit 99.17 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(xvi)(xviii)  Form of Universal Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Substitute Awards-Non-employee Board Member (Exhibit 99.19 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(xvii)(xix)  Form of Universal Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Substitute Awards-Non-employee Board Member (Deferral Elections) (Exhibit 99.20 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).

(xviii)(xx)  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Substitute 2012 Performance-Based Award-Executive Officer (Exhibit 99.21 to Form S-8 filed on June 29, 2012).
(xxix)(xxi)  Form of Notice of Award of Performance Share Units (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2013).

(xx)(xxii)  Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2013).

(xxi)(xxiii)  Form of Notice of Award of Performance Share Units (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xix) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).

(xxii)(xxiv)  Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xx) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).

(xxiii)(xxv)  Form of Letter Agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, dated June 28, 2012).

(xxiv)(xxvi)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, dated June 28, 2012).

(xxvii) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, amended and restated as of July 29, 2019 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxvi) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019.
(xxv)(xxviii)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. One-Year Performance Improvement Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2013)..

(xxvi)(xxix)  Amendment No. 1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. One-Year Performance Improvement Incentive Plan, dated July 29, 2014 (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxii) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).

(xxvii)(xxx)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Excess Benefits Plan (Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K, dated June 28, 2012).
(xxviii)(xxxi)  Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Excess Benefits Plan, effective as of March 1, 2013 (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxiii) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
(xxix)(xxxii) Amendment No. 2 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Excess Benefits Plan, effective as of January 1, 2020 (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxxii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
(xxxiii)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxii) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).
(xxx)(xxxiv)  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Retirement Plan for Outside Directors (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxiii) to Form 10‑Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).

117



(xxxi)(xxxv)  Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Retirement Plan for Outside Directors, effective as of March 1, 2013 (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxvi) to Form 10‑Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
(xxxii)(xxxvi)  Letter Agreement, dated October 22, 2009, between Alexander & Baldwin, LLC (formerly known as Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.) and W. Allen Doane (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.b.1(liv) to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
(xxxiii)  Retention(xxxvii) Letter Agreement, dated July 10, 2017,March 21, 2019, between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and Paul K. ItoBrett Brown (Exhibit 10.110.b.1(xxxviii) to Form 8-K, dated July 10, 2017)10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019).
(xxxiv)  Amendment to Retention Agreement, dated December 20, 2017, between(xxxviii) 2019 Alexander & Baldwin Inc. and Paul K. Ito.Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan Adoption Agreement (Exhibit 10.b.1(xxxviii) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).
(xxxv)  Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 10, 2017, between(xxxix) Base Plan for 2019 Alexander & Baldwin Inc. and James E. MeadNonqualified Defined Contribution Plan Adoption Agreement (Exhibit 10.210.b.1(xxxix) to Form 8-K, dated July 10, 2017)10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).
*All exhibits listed under 10.b.1. are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

21.    Subsidiaries.Subsidiaries
21.21.1  Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Subsidiaries as of February 1, 2018.2020.
23.    Consent.Consent

23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated March 1, 2018.February 27, 2020.
23.2 Consent of KKDLY LLC dated March 1, 2018 - Kewalo Development LLC.
23.3 Consent of KKDLY LLC dated March 1, 2018 - The Collection LLC.
31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
95.  Mine Safety Disclosure.
99.1 Financial Statements of Kewalo Development LLC as of and101. The following information from Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
99.2 Financial Statements of Kewalo Development LLC as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
99.3 Financial Statements of The Collection LLC as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
99.4 Financial Statements of The Collection LLC as of and for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019, formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operation, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statements of Equity, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
104. Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

118





SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
  ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
  (Registrant)
   
   
March 1, 2018February 27, 2020 By: /s/ Christopher J. Benjamin
  Christopher J. Benjamin
  President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

119




Signature Title Date
     
/s/ Stanley M. Kuriyama Chairman of the Board March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
Stanley M. Kuriyama    
     
/s/ Christopher J. Benjamin President, Chief Executive March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
Christopher J. Benjamin Officer, and Director  
     
/s/ James E. MeadBrett A. Brown Executive Vice President and March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
James E. MeadBrett A. Brown Chief Financial Officer  
     
/s/ Clayton K.Y. Chun Senior Vice President, Chief March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
Clayton K.Y. Chun Accounting Officer and Controller  
     
/s/ W. Allen Doane Director March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
W. Allen Doane    
     
/s/ Robert S. Harrison Director March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
Robert S. Harrison    
     
/s/ David C. HuliheeDiana M. Laing Director March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
David C. Hulihee
/s/ Charles G. KingLead Independent DirectorMarch 1, 2018
Charles G. KingDiana M. Laing    
     
/s/ Thomas A. Lewis, Jr. Director March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
Thomas A. Lewis, Jr.    
     
/s/ Douglas M. Pasquale DirectorLead Independent March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
Douglas M. Pasquale Director  
     
/s/ Michele K. Saito Director March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
Michele K. Saito
/s/ Jenai S. WallDirectorMarch 1, 2018
Jenai S. Wall    
     
/s/ Eric K. Yeaman Director March 1, 2018February 27, 2020
Eric K. Yeaman    



120109