Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10‑K10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 or

For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                          to                        

For the transition period from                          to

Commission file No. 0‑186400-18640

CHEROKEEAPEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Delaware

 

95-4182437

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

95‑4182437

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

5990 Sepulveda Boulevard
Sherman Oaks, CA 91411
(Address of principal executive office, including zip code)

(818) 908‑9868
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

5990 Sepulveda Boulevard
Sherman Oaks, CA 91411

(818) 908‑9868
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.02 par value per share

Name of exchange on which registered:APEX

NASDAQ Global SelectNasdaq Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well‑known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes   No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes   No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES Yes   NO   N0 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S‑TS-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes:   No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S‑K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10‑K or any amendment to this Form 10‑K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non‑accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

  ☐

 

Accelerated filer

  

Large accelerated filerEmerging Growth Company

  ☐

Accelerated filer ☒

Non‑accelerated filer ☐

Smaller Reporting Company

  

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging Growth Company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accountant standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Act). Yes   No 

As of July 29, 2016,August 2, 2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non‑affiliates of the registrant was approximately $91.0$8.0 million (computed by reference to the price at which the registrant’s common stock was last sold on July 29, 2016,August 2, 2019, as reported by the NASDAQ Global SelectNasdaq Capital Market). For purposes of this calculation, it has been assumed that shares of common stock held by each director, each officer and any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock of the registrant are held by affiliates of the registrant. The treatment of these persons as affiliates for purposes of this calculation is not, conclusiveand shall not be considered, a determination as to whether such persons are affiliates of the registrant for any other purpose.

As of April 20, 2017,16, 2020, the registrant had 12,951,2845,570,530 shares of its common stock, issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement  (the “Proxy Statement”)  for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about June 22, 2017 are incorporated by this reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10K (the “Annual Report”).

 

 

 


Table of Contents

CHEROKEE INC.APEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

INDEXANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Page

PART I

Item 1.

Business

2

4

Item 1A.  

Risk Factors

13

8

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

27

20

Item 2.  

Properties

27

20

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

27

20

Item 4.  

Mine Safety Disclosures

27

20

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

28

21

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

30

21

Item 7.  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationOperations

31

23

Item 7A.

Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures of Market Risk

50

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

51

34

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

82

57

Item 9A.  

Controls and Procedures

83

57

Item 9B. 

Other Informationinformation

88

57

PART III

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

89

59

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

89

62

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

89

68

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

89

71

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

89

73

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

90

74

Item 16.  

Form 10-K Summary

74

 

 

 


Table of Contents

As used in this Annual Report, “Cherokee“Apex Global Brands”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to CherokeeApex Global Brands Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates or requires otherwise.  Additionally, as used herein, “Fiscal 2018”2020” refers to theour fiscal year ending February 1, 2020; “Fiscal 2019” refers to our fiscal year ended February 3, 2018; “Fiscal 2017” refers to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017; “Fiscal 2016” refers to the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016; and “Fiscal 2015” refers to the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.2, 2019.

We own the registered trademarks or trademark applications for Cherokee®, Hi-Tec®, Magnum®,50 Peaks®, Interceptor®,Hawk Signature®, Tony Hawk®, Liz Lange®, Completely Me by Liz Lange®, Flip Flop Shops®, Everyday California®, Carole Little®, Saint Tropez-West®, Chorus Line®, All That Jazz®, Sideout®, Sideout Sport®, and others.  Although we do not use the “®”symbol in each instance in which one of our trademarks appears in this Annual Report, this should not be construed as any indication that we will not assert our rights thereto to the fullest extent under applicable law.  All other trademarks, trade names and service marks included in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report, our quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and press releases and other written or oral statements we may make from time to time may contain “forward‑looking statements” within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical facts that relate to future events or circumstances or our future performance.  The words “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “plans”, “expects”, “objectives”, “goals”, “aims”, “hopes”, “may”, “might”, “will”, “likely”, “should” and similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward‑looking statements.statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking.

Forward‑looking statements in this Annual Report include statements about, among other things:

our goals or expectations for our future performance, including anticipated revenue and expense levels and projections about other elements of our results of operations;

expectations about our sources of capital and other matters relating to our liquidity;

our ability to manage the various licensing and selling models we use in our operations;

expected trends in the retail industry, including apparent trends relating to our different licensing models;

the competitive environment in which we operate and the nature and impact of competitive developments in our industry;

our expectations about consumer acceptance and sales levels of products bearing our brands;

the anticipated impact on our business and performance of factors relating to our licensees’ and franchisees’ businesses and operations;

the likelihood of sustained or increased sales by, or royalty revenues from, our existing licensees and franchisees;

our prospects for obtaining new licensees and franchisees;

the success of any new licensee or franchisee relationships we may establish, including the level of royalty revenues they may generate;

our prospects for identifying and successfully acquiring new brands;

the success and importance of any acquisitions, divestitures, investments or other strategic relationships or transactions we may announce, including our ability to integrate acquired brands or businesses into our operations and achieve the intended benefits of any such acquisitions;

2


Table of Contents

·

our goals or expectations for our future performance, including anticipated trends in our revenues and other elements of our results of operations and expectations regarding our expense levels, sources of capital and other matters relating to our liquidity;

·

our business and growth strategies, including our ability to successfully implement these strategies and their expected trends in the retail industry, including apparent trends around “Direct to Retail” “Wholesale-Licensing” or other licensing models

·

our expectations regarding consumer acceptance and sales levels of products bearing the intellectual property of our brand portfolio;

·

the anticipated incomeimpact on our business and performance of factors relating to our licensees’ and franchisees’ operations;performance;

·

the likelihood of sustained retail and/or wholesale sales by our current licensees

our expectations about the geographic and customer markets that show the most promise for acceptance of our brands and increased sales of products bearing our brands;

·

our ability to manage our direct to retail licensing business, wholesale licensing business and franchising business;

general economic, political and market conditions;

·

our prospects for obtaining new licensees and franchisees;

the expected or potential impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and the related responses of the government, consumers, and the company, on our business, financial condition and results of operations; and

the impact of the above factors and other future events on the market price and trading volume of our common stock.

·

our prospects for identifying and successfully acquiring or representing new brands;

·

our ability to integrate acquired brands or businesses into our operations and achieve the intended benefits of any such acquisitions, such as our recent acquisitions of the franchise operation of the Flip Flop Shop brand and the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands; and

·

our ability to timely and effectively implement appropriate procedures to remediate the material weaknesses identified in our internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017.

Forward‑looking statements are based on our current views, expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and uncertaintiesother factors that may cause actual results, performance, achievements or sharestock prices to be materially different from any future results, performance, achievements or sharestock prices expressed or implied by the forward‑looking statements.  Such risks, uncertainties and uncertaintiesother factors include, among others, the risks descriedthose described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.  YouIn addition, we operate in a competitive and rapidly evolving industry in which new risks emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of the risks we may face, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors could cause actual results to differ from our expectations.  As a result of these and other potential risks and uncertainties, forward-looking statements should not place undue reliancebe relied on the forward‑looking statements we makeor viewed as predictions of future events because some or all of them may turn out to be wrong.  Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any of the forward‑looking statements we make to reflect future events andor developments or changes in our expectations or for any other reason.

We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by this cautionary note.

1


 

3


Table of Contents

PART PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

BUSINESS

Overview

CherokeeApex Global Brands is a global marketer and manager of a portfolio of fashion and lifestyle brands it owns or represents, licensingthat we own, brands that we create, and brands that we develop for others. Cherokee Inc. changed its name to Apex Global Brands Inc. effective June 27, 2019. Company-owned brands, which are licensed in multiple consumer product categories and retail tiers around the world, include Cherokee, Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks, Interceptor, Hawk Signature, Tony Hawk, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Flip Flop Shops, Everyday California, Carole Little, and Sideout and related trademarks and other brands in multiple consumer product categories and sectors.others.  As part of our business strategy, we also regularly evaluate other brands and trademarks for acquisition into our portfolio.  We believe the strength of our brand portfolio and platform of design, product sourcingdevelopment and marketing capabilities has made us one of the leading global licensors of style focusedstyle-focused lifestyle brands for apparel, footwear, accessories and home products and accessories.products.

We have entered into license agreementslicensing relationships with recognizable retail partners in their respective global locations to provide them with the rights to design, manufacture and sell products bearing our brands, and to provide them access to our proprietary 360-degree platform. We refer to this strategy as our “Direct to Retail” or “DTR”we also have licensing model. We have also entered into wholesale arrangementsrelationships with manufacturers and distributors for the manufacture and sale of products bearing certain of our brands.  We refer to this strategy asAs a brand marketer and manager, we do not directly sell product ourselves.  Rather, we earn royalties when our “Wholesale” licensing model. Further, in connection with our acquisition oflicensees sell licensed products bearing the Flip Flop Shops trademarktrademarks that we own, or when they sell products that we have designed and related assets, we acquired, and became the franchisor under, franchise agreements with franchisees that operate Flip Flop Shops retail stores located worldwide.  In addition, we conduct direct and indirect product sales to select distributors and government entities for our Hi-Tec and Magnum brands.developed.

We provide our licensees with access to our proprietary 360-degree platform and believe that our retail responsiveness processbrand marketing and 360-degree unique value propositionmedia outreach, product design and development capabilities, and growth strategies and tactics have allowed CherokeeApex Global Brands to address the growing power of the consumer and the present and future needs of the wholesalers, distributorsour wholesale and retailers that are selling our portfolio of lifestyle brands.retail business partners and licensees.  Based on consumer research, retail insights and brand insights that we continually measure, evaluate and incorporate into our 360-degree platform, we believe CherokeeApex Global Brands has become a key strategic partner to our licensees.  AsWe believe our licensing partners rely on our vision, which defines the growth potential and trajectories of January 28, 2017, we had 124 continuing license agreements in over 110 countries, 24 of which pertained to the Cherokee brand and 81 of which pertain to the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands.

We create and establish our brands, with a viewthe agility we afford to global scalability by developing marketing strategies and innovative products for each brand and deploying the tools developedthem through our 360-degree capabilities platform.  Our key strengths are exemplified by the following three value pillars, which guide our strategies and which we believe position us to expand our business:

Vision – We deliver our licensee partners a brand vision designed to drive differentiation and a fresh point of view for engaging customers across every touch point and in multiple categories.

Agility – We offer our licensee partners access to our 360-degree platform, which is designed to provide the agility to quickly seize opportunities and integrate new innovations, and the opportunity to realize global, multi-channel, multi-category scale through our portfolio of lifestyle brands and swiftly introduce our branded products.

Scale – We believe the scalabilityplatform capabilities.  As of our brands enables our licensee partners to fully leverage our brands’ physical and digital spaces with multi-category relevancy and with globally recognized brands that drive a seamless customer experience.

We derive revenues primarily from licensing our trademarks to retailers and wholesalers all over the world. Our current licensee relationships cover over 110 countries and over 12,000 retail stores and Ecommerce businesses that includesFebruary 1, 2020, we had 42 continuing license agreements in approximately 144 countries.  These arrangements include relationships with Walmart, Target Corporation (“Target”), Kohl’s Illinois, Inc. (“Kohl’s”), Soriana, Comercial Mexicana, TJ Maxx, Tottus, Pick N Pay, Nishimatsuya Walmart, Big 5, Academy,Arvind, Reliance Retail, Tharanco, Martes Sports, Hi-Tec Europe, Hi-Tec South Africa, JD Sports, Black’s and REI. Our two most significant licenseesLidl, in Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016, and Fiscal 2015 were Target and Kohl’s.

2


Table of Contents

addition to regional distributors.

Licensing and Other Selling Models

Direct to Retail

In Direct to Retail licensing, or “DTR” licensing, we grant retailers a “territory” or “channel-specific” license to use our trademarks on certain categories of merchandise.  We collaborate with our licensees’ product development staff and merchandisers on design direction, packaging, marketing and other aspects pertaining to the products sold with our trademarks, and in some cases our licensees modify or expand the designs or create their own designs to suit their seasonal, regional and category needs.  In several cases, the licensee is responsible for designing and manufacturing the merchandise, although many products are subject to our pre‑approved packaging, graphics and quality control standards and many of our licensees’ marketing campaigns are subject to similar oversight.  We plan to continue to solicit new licensees using our Direct to RetailDTR licensing model in new territories and additional product categories as we seek to expand this part of our business.

We believe that the Direct to RetailThe DTR licensing model generally offers each licensee, or retailer, the exclusive right to market multiple categories of products with a recognized brand within their territory, thereby offering our licensees the ability to enhance their marketing strategies and achieve a competitive advantage over competing retailers.  ThisWe believe that this differentiation can also provide the retailer/licensee an opportunity to command a “premium” for our high-equity brand offering over private label price points, which can result in increased profit margins for the licensee, even after royalties have been paid to the licensor.  The licensees generally directly source their own inventory,merchandise, thereby eliminating the licensor’s exposure to inventory and manufacturing risk while allowing the licensees to benefit from large economies of scale.

Many of the world’s largest retailers have successfully introduced, and continue to introduce, new brands based on the DTR licensing model.  Examples of retailers actively participating in the DTR licensing model include Walmart, Target, Carrefour, Kohl’sLidl and C&A, among others.

4


Table of Contents

Our Direct to RetailDTR licensing strategy is premised on the proposition that, for many retailers worldwide, most aspects of the moderately priced apparel, accessory, footwear and home categories, including product development, design, merchandising, sourcing and distribution, can be executed most effectively by these retailers themselves, who typically command significant economies of scale, but also interact daily with their end consumers.  We believe that many of these retailers may be able to obtain higher gross margins on sales and increase store traffic by sourcing, stocking and selling licensed products bearing widely recognized brand names (such as our brands) than by carrying only private label goods or by carrying only branded products obtained from third‑party vendors.  We also believe that many retailers may be able to achieve enhanced profitability with our Direct to RetailDTR licensing model because it allows them to avoid the substantial marketing costs associated with establishing and maintaining an in‑store brand.

Wholesale

We also license our brands to manufacturers and distributors based on wholesale arrangements.  Wholesale licensing arrangements generally involve licensing to manufacturers and distributors that produce andand/or import various categories of apparel, accessory,accessories, footwear and home products under our trademarks and trademarks owned by third parties and sell the licensed products to retailers, which then resell the products to consumers.

Although our strategy has historically been focused primarily on the DTR licensing model, weWe have some historical wholesale licensees with respect to some of our brands and we have recently entered into several new wholesale arrangements for the Cherokee, Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk brands.  In addition, we are primarily relying on a wholesale licensing strategy for global sales of our Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks and Interceptor brands.

Design Services

We provide product design and development services for retailers that prefer to sell brands that they own.  We believe these arrangements signal an expansionthat our 360-degree platform provides the key ingredients for retailers to our strategy to increase the sales of products bearing our brands in the United States, including our namesake Cherokee brand, which has been governed by one license agreement using our DTR licensing model.  We believe these wholesale licensing arrangements will help to diversify our sources of revenue, increase our royalty rates through our licensee or other partner relationships and will provide additional avenues to obtain brand recognition and grow our Company, including the opportunity to further expand the reach of our brands into markets where a DTR licensing model may not be the most effective approach. Recently, through our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands in December 2016, we have signed up wholesalers in the U.S., Pan-European and South Africa territories for our Hi-Tec and Magnum brands.

3


Table of Contents

Indirect Product Sales

Since our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands, we have been indirectly selling footwear bearing these brands to certain select wholesalers and government entitiesefficiently produce product ranges that are customerstailored for their target consumers and the retailers’ specific business needs.  Our retail partners can rely on our product development and design capabilities, which are supported by our retail and brand marketing abilities, focusing their resources instead on retail operations.  We expect that together this will lead to increased rates of these brands. In these arrangements, the purchasers of the products place their product orders directly with us, which we then forward to a manufacturer for the manufacturesale, greater sell-through and delivery of the products directly to the original purchaser. As a result, the product purchasers in these arrangements receive products directly from the manufacturer, which is similar to our wholesale licensing relationships and eliminates most inventory and manufacturing risk. We maintain these indirect product sale relationships with a minimal portion of the customers of the Hi-Tec family of footwear brands. This indirect product sales system pre-existed our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands and we do not intend to expand this model to other customers of these brands or to our other brands.  See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion & Analysis—Recent Developments” for further information regarding the Hi-Tec acquisition.

Franchise

Our franchise business involves licensing our Flip Flop Shops brand to third-party franchisees that operateimproved retail stores under this brand name. In our franchising operations, we typically specify the products and services that will be offered by the franchisees and also provide them with an operating system and other operational support. The Flip Flop Shops franchise structure aligns with our strategic plan and business model.  As part of our growth plan for Flip Flop Shops, we intend to expand store inventory to include more Company-owned brands and expand the retail concept through a combination of new retail store locations, shop-in-shops and mobile commerce.  During January 2017 we launched an e-commerce platform for Flip Flop Shops.performance.

Brand Portfolio

Cherokee Global Brands markets brands it owns and brands it represents. Generally, when representing brands, we perform a range of services including product design, product sourcing through third party manufacturers, the creation of marketing assets, solicitation of licensees, contract negotiations and administration and maintenance of license or distribution agreements, among other things. In exchange for our services, we typically receive a certain percentage of the net royalties generated by the brands we represent. Summaries of some of our brands are provided below.

Cherokee

Cherokee is an iconic, American family‑lifestyle brand, offering classic, casual and comfortable products at affordable prices.  Cherokee, which was initially launched as a footwear line in 1973, seeks to produce timeless classics, inspired by vintage Americana while continually being updated to account for modern trends.  After four decades, the Cherokee brand stands for confident, effortless and relaxed American style.  We believe this heritage positions the Cherokee brand for future growth and further international expansion.   Additional categories of Cherokee branded products are sold internationally across multiple age ranges in a wide range of categories, including adult apparel,casual sportswear, sweaters, outerwear, active wear, dresses, denim, swimwear, sleepwear, accessories, home décor, textiles, outdoor furnishings and camping gear.

Key Licensee—Target

Historically, the Cherokee brand’s most significant licensee was Target, which launched the Cherokee brand almost two decades ago as a multi‑category product offering that encompassed kid’s apparel, accessories, footwear and school uniforms (the rights to which we acquired in January 2013). Our relationship with Target covering Cherokee branded products ended in January 2017.

Our former license agreement with Target granted Target exclusive rights to the Cherokee brand in various specified categories of merchandise in the United States. Under this license arrangement, for all of Target’sRoyalty revenues from global sales of Cherokee branded products exceptwere $6.7 million and $9.7 million in Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively, which accounted for sales32% and 40% of Cherokee branded productsour total royalty revenues in Canada (which ceased asthese years.  Our wholesale distributor licenses offer a resultvariety of Target Canada bankruptcy), sales of Cherokee branded adult products sold on Target’s website and sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category, Target paid us royalties based on rates that reduced after Target achieved specified cumulative sales volume thresholds during each fiscal year. These royalty rate reductions did not apply

4


Table of Contents

retroactively to Target’s retail sales since the beginning of the applicable fiscal year, but rather applied only to sales made during the applicable fiscal year subsequent to the achievement of the specified sales volume threshold. Our license arrangement with Target governing sales of Cherokee branded adult products sold on Target’s website and Cherokee branded products sold in the school uniforms category provided for a fixed royalty rate based on Target’s net sales of products during each fiscal quarter.

Our license agreement with Target covering sales of most Cherokee branded products in the United States expired on January 31, 2017. Our license agreement with Target covering sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category will expire at the end of its current term on January 31, 2018, and will continue to generate revenues to Cherokee Global Brands until its expiration.

Royalty revenues from Target’s salescategories of products bearing the Cherokee brand to retailers in the Unites States, excluding sales of Cherokee branded products in Canada and sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category, were $10.5 million during Fiscal 2017, $14.9 million during Fiscal 2016 and $15.0 million during Fiscal 2015, which accounted for 31%, 43%, and 43%United States.  A large majority of our total royalty revenues duringCherokee brand royalties are now derived from multiple DTR license agreements with various retailers outside the respective periods. Replacing the royalty revenues received from TargetUnited States, many of which have been in place for Cherokee branded products is a significant challenge, and the expiration of this license agreement may have a material adverse effect on our business. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for additional information.several years.  

Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks and MagnumInterceptor

Founded in 1974 and based in the Netherlands, the Hi-Tec footwear brand seeks to produce quality shoes for a fair price.  Theprice that are “comfortable anywhere”.  Hi-Tec family of footwear brands includes Hi-Tec,is known for its comfortable and lightweight hiking and walking shoes, Magnum, whichand also produces work boot footwear, and several other footwear brands that produce specific-purpose tactical boots, uniform footwear, technical outdoor footwear and various other types of shoes.  These footwear brands are sold in over 110 countries, predominately in the United Kingdom, continental Europe, the United States, Canada, South Africa, South and Central America and Asia through major retailers, independent distributors, licensees and directly to consumers.  Today, theThe Hi-Tec brand is one of the world’s leaders in sports and outdoor footwear.

We acquired the Hi-Tec,  Magnum produces work boot footwear, specific-purpose tactical boots and other associated footwear brands in December 2016.  Before our acquisition, the Hi-Tec brands were operated under a full spectrum distribution model, meaning that one group of affiliated companies owned the brands and manufactured the products.  In connection with our acquisition of these brands, we sold the associated operating assets to certain operating partners and/or distributors and entered into new wholesale licensing arrangements with these operating partners and/or distributors.  Through these transactions and our post-acquisition integration efforts, we are converting the Hi-Tec brands to a branded licensing model.  Going forward, we primarily intend to pursue a wholesale licensing model for these brands.

50 Peaks and Interceptor

uniform footwear.  50 Peaks is a high spec, technical outdoor footwear brand that was born out of the accomplishments of adventurer Adrian Crane, who climbed the 50 highest peaks in each of the 50 states in the USA in a record time of 101 days.  Interceptor is a tactical footwear brand sold internationally, with primary distribution through Walmart U.S.  Hi-Tec and Magnum products are sold throughout the world.  The Interceptor brand is currently sold at Walmart U.S.  We acquiredworld in Europe, the United States, Canada, South Africa, the Middle East, South and Central America, Oceania and Asia.

5


Table of Contents

Royalty revenues from global sales of Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks and Interceptor brandsbranded products were $10.5 and $11.6 million in December 2016Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively, which accounted for 50% and 47% of our total royalty revenues in connection with the Hi-Tec acquisition.  50 Peaks has been a Hi-Tec brand since 1990 and has substantial name brand recognition amongst its customers.those years.  

Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk

Tony Hawk is among the most well‑known athletes in skateboarding history and is the founder of the Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk Signature apparel line. Designedlines.  The Tony Hawk brand is designed for comfort, flexibility and durability the Tony Hawk brand is designed to embodyand it embodies the “skate culture” lifestyle, combining style with performance.  We acquired the TonyThe Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk brands in January 2014, which hashave expanded our presence in the department store and specialty channels of distribution. The brand is exclusively licensed in the United States to Kohl’s, with Tony Hawk clothing and accessories sold in Kohl’s department stores and online. Separate wholesale license agreements are in place to supply Hawk and Tony Hawk

5


Table of Contents

signature apparel in Canada with Walmart Canada and throughout Europe and we intend to secure additional licensees to expand these brands globally.

Licensing revenues for our Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk brands totaled $5.0 millionbranded products are distributed to a variety of retailers in the United States, including specialty, mid-tier, regional, mass market, off-price and $5.0club stores, by several wholesale distributors under license agreements with these distributors.  In addition, we have separate wholesale license agreements with others to supply Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk apparel in China, Japan, South Korea and throughout Europe. Royalty revenues from global sales of Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk branded products were $0.3 and $0.6 million in Fiscal 20172020 and Fiscal 2016,2019, respectively, which represented 15%accounted for 1% and 14%,3% of our total royalty revenues for the respective periods.

Key Licensee—Kohl’s

In connection with our acquisition of the Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk brands in January 2014, Cherokee Global Brands entered into a retail license agreement with Kohl’s. This license agreement, as amended, grants Kohl’s exclusive rights, through July 2017 at which point, the contract converts to a non-exclusive right to sell the Tony Hawk and Tony Hawk Signature apparel brands in various specified categories of merchandise in the United States. The current term of the license agreement, as amended, with Kohl’s continues through January 31, 2018, and obligated Kohl’s to pay Cherokee Global Brands an annual minimum royalty of $4.8 million prior to January 28, 2017 and $4.6 million for the remainder of the term.

Liz Lange and Completely Me by Liz Lange

Liz Lange has gained wide acceptance as a modern “maternity and beyond” designer brand that brings women versatile, comfortable, affordable and flattering style for every stage of pregnancy. Liz Lange maternity apparel debuted in over 1,500 Target stores in the United States in 2002 and continues to be sold exclusively in Target stores in the United States. During 2010, Completely Me by Liz Lange was launched exclusively on the Home Shopping Network in the United States and The Shopping Channel in Canada. The Completely Me brand consists of sophisticated and comfortable casual clothing and sportswear for women. We acquired the Liz Lange brands in September 2012.

Key Licensee—Target

During September 2012, we assumed a license agreement with Target covering sales of Liz Lange branded maternity products in the United States. Pursuant to this agreement, Target pays Cherokee Global Brands a fixed royalty rate based on Target’s net sales of products bearing this brand.  Target has informed us that it has elected to not renew the Liz Lange license agreement, which expires on January 31, 2018 at the end of the current term, Target will continue to pay royalties to Cherokee Global Brands until the expiration of the agreement.  Cherokee Global Brands has entered into a master license agreement with a third party for Liz Lange branded maternity products beginning in Fiscal 2019.

Flip Flop Shops

Flip Flop Shops is an authentic market-leading retail franchise chain devoted to the hottest brands and latest styles of flip flops, casual footwear and accessories.  Flip Flop Shops currently has approximately 72 retail franchise shops in the U.S., Canada, the Caribbean, the Middle East and South Africa. Its locations carry definitive assortments of recognized brands including OluKai, SANUK, Cobian, Havaianas, Quiksilver, ROXY, Reef, and many more.  We acquired the Flip Flop Shop brands in October 2015.those years.  

Everyday California

Crafted in Southern California, Everyday California is designed to embody the California spirit and celebrate living life to the fullest.  From California’s snowcapped mountains to theits sandy shores, Everyday California apparel and accessories for men and women are the perfect match for any journey.  Everyday California was born out of a desire to share the California state of mind and the notion that adventure is just around the corner.We acquired the Everyday California brand in May 2015.

6


Table of Contents

  In addition to the United States, Everyday California is distributed in Mexico and Japan.

Point Cove

Point Cove was created in-house by CherokeeApex Global Brands'Brands' design team in close collaboration with Reliance Trends, a chain of retail stores in India.  The brand was launched in September 2015 and brings a combination of playfulness and sophistication to Reliance Trends stores in key categories, including apparel, accessories and footwear, for kids ages 2-14.  The collection features bold colors that bring the California spirit to India.

Carole Little

Carole Little was founded in 1975 by designer Carole Little through her love for contemporary clothing.  The Carole Little brand became recognized for colorful and unusual prints, soft two‑piece outfits and dresses. The Carole Little branddresses, and has an ageless, independent attitude for the self‑confident woman.

Sideout

Conceived in 1983 by a California volleyball player, the Sideout brand took root at the beach, harnessing the easy spirit of a casual California lifestyle.  Ideal for a game of beach volleyball or a breezy vacation, Sideout products perform in quality, functionality and originality by offering casual, hip and cool clothing, footwear and accessories at affordable prices.

Value Pillars

We are guided by three value pillars that speak to our diverse global partners:

·

Vision—we deliver to our licensing partners a brand vision that will drive differentiation and a fresh point of view to engage customers across every touch point and in multiple categories

o

Expert point-of-view

o

Total retail strategy

o

Organic growth drivers

o

Forge strategic partnerships

·

Agility—our partners depend on the agility of our unique 360-degree platform to quickly seize opportunity and swiftly introduce our branded products

o

Agility enabler

o

We direct – you select

o

Content delivery

·

Scale—our licensing partners appreciate the scalability of our brands and the ability to fully leverage their physical and digital spaces with multi-category relevancy and with globally recognized brands that drive a seamless customer experience

o

Physical and digital commerce

o

Global design

o

Brand optimization

We create and establish our brands on a global basis (scale) via superb marketing (vision), strong execution (agility), innovative products & exceptional leadership.

7


Table of Contents

Our Strategies

Our key business strategies include the following:

360-Degree Platform

As part of our strategy, we provide our licensees with access to our proprietary 360‑degree platform which seamlessly integrates with our licensing model and which we believe is part of the attraction of our brands to our retailers and other licensees. Our 360‑degree platform includes the following:

·

Product Design and Development—Our product design and development activities are led by design teams that work collectively with the licensees for each of our brands to develop a story, point‑of‑view and point‑of‑difference, develop product guidelines, including graphic language, fabrics, quality details and trim, and oversee execution to maintain brand integrity including pricing and line architecture. These teams also assist in developing innovative seasonal product design concepts for our brands to maximize organic growth opportunities that lead to category expansion.

·

Marketing and Media Support—Our marketing services are designed to evolve and strengthen the positioning of our brands in collaboration with our retail partners on a direct‑to‑consumer and consumer‑to‑consumer basis by, among other things, creating enhanced in‑store experiences with the introduction of custom design fixtures and visual displays, developing an integrated retail strategy across all consumer touch‑points, including in‑store, social media and other online avenues and cultivating relationships with credible brand ambassadors.

·

Brand Expansion and Insights—These initiatives, which aim to achieve strategic revenue growth, include, among others, joint business planning by providing retail analytics data and marketing research about consumer insights and trends and identifying and sharing approved global sourcing and manufacturing vendors, organic growth roadmaps with customized sales and merchandising plans for each of our brands and routine analysis of sales patterns to direct our geographic, product category and brand expansion efforts.

Organic Growth of Our Business

Organic growth involves introducing new product categories with existing partners and expanding existing brands into new stores and new territories. We are focused on the following organic growth drivers: a larger online presence with our partners in order to capitalize on the growth of digital commerce; enhanced in-store experiences, such as shop-in-shop floor presentations; product category expansion such as new apparel categories, home, sportswear, beauty, athletic, designer, denim, performance and accessories; and growth of our partners’ businesses, including opening new stores or otherwise expanding their operations.

Expand Our Brand Portfolio

We regularly evaluate other brands and trademarks for acquisition into our portfolio. We target style-focused lifestyle brands, such as our recently acquired Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks, Interceptor, Everyday California and Flip Flop Shops brands. We evaluate new brand candidates based on their global market potential and product category expansion opportunities, in categories such as home, sportswear, beauty, athletic, designer, denim, performance, footwear, and accessories.

Build New Partner Relationships

As part of our strategy, we evaluate and pursue relationships with new retailers, wholesalers and other licensees in order to expand the reach of our existing brands into new geographic and customer markets and new types of stores and other selling mediums. This strategy also involves diversifying our types of partner relationships to include additional DTR licensees, wholesale licensees and, with our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops trademark and brand

8


Table of Contents

name, franchisees of this brand. In our efforts to expand our portfolio of licensee partners, we acquired a number of new licensees for our existing brands in a variety of territories in Fiscal 2017, some of which are described below.

During Fiscal 2017, we entered into license agreements with nine wholesale distributors to distribute a variety of categories of products bearing the Cherokee brand within the U.S. to various retailers beginning in Fiscal 2018.  The categories cover a wide range of Cherokee products including men’s and boy’s casual sportswear, sweaters and outerwear; newborn, infant and toddler boys and girls clothing and layette; girl’s active wear, sportswear, dresses, denim, and sweaters; and swimwear and sleepwear.

We entered into three additional license agreements (two during Fiscal 2017 and one during Fiscal 2018) for our Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk brands.  The license agreements are for broad distribution of the brands in the United States for all retail, including specialty, mid-tier, regional, mass market, off-price and club retail.

Royalties and Other Revenues

License Royalties

Our rights to receive royalties for sales of products bearing our brands or products we have developed and designed are set forth in the terms of our license agreements with various retailers and wholesalers.  The royalty rates we receive from our licensees vary depending on the terms of each licensing agreement.  Generally, our DTR license agreements include royalty rates based on a percentage of the retailer’s net sales of licensed products.  Some of our DTR license agreements provide for fixed royalty rates, calculated based on a fixed percentage of retail product sale, and other DTR license agreements provide for royalty rates that may decrease or otherwise fluctuate depending onduring a year as the retailer’s achievement of certain annualretailer achieves sales volume thresholds.  For wholesale license agreements, royalty rates are generally calculated based on a fixed percentage of wholesale sales from the wholesaler to the retailer.retailer or a fixed percentage of manufacturing costs.

6


Table of Contents

In manysome cases, particularly in our DTR licensing arrangements, we require the licensee to guarantee a minimum annual royalty payment to us each year.  Our largest guaranteedyear, although the amount of this minimum annual royalty payment can vary significantly from licensee to licensee and is typically lower for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 was from Targetwholesale licensees than for $10.5 million for each period.DTR licensees.  We do not have a significant concentration of fixed minimum payments in any one licensee.  As of January 28, 2017,February 1, 2020, we had contractual rights to receive over $108.8$50.0 million forward‑facing minimum royalty revenues over the next sixten years, excluding any revenues that may be guaranteed in connection with future contract renewals.

Royalties are generally paid within 30 days after a quarterly selling period that has beenas defined in the applicable license agreement.  In order toTo ensure our licensees are reporting and calculating the appropriate royalties, all of our license agreements grant us the right to audit our licensees’ retail sales data for our brandsroyalty reports to validate the amount of sales or purchases reported and royalties paid.

Franchise Fees and Royalties

Franchisees who wish to operate Flip Flop Shops retail locations in the United States enter into a franchise agreement with us that generally provides franchise rights for each location for an initial term of 10 years and typically includes a 10-year renewal provision, subject to certain conditions as specified in the franchise agreement. The agreements provide the franchisee the rights to use the Flip Flop Shops brand name, trademarks and know-how in the operation of a Flip Flop Shops retail store. Franchisees typically pay us an initial franchise fee and royalty fees based on a percentage of gross sales at each retail store.

In certain non-U.S. markets, we may grant a master franchisee exclusivity to develop or sub-franchise a territory for a specified number of new Flip Slop Shops locations in the territory based on a negotiated schedule. In these instances, the master franchisee pays an initial master franchise fee, a per-location opening fee and a royalty fee based on a percentage of gross sales at the retail stores.

9


Table of Contents

Indirect Product Sale Revenues

As described under “LicensingTrademarks and Other Selling Models” above, we maintain indirect product sale relationships with certain select wholesalers, distributors and government entity customers of the Hi-Tec family of footwear brands, until such time that we convert the arrangements to traditional wholesale licensing arrangements. We began recording revenues from these relationships in December 2016 when we acquired these brands. In these arrangements, the retailers and government entities that purchase products submit payments directly to us for their product orders, the pricing of which is typically a preset percentage markup to our cost, and we then remit the cost of these payments to the manufacturer of the purchased products. As a result, a significant portion of our revenues from these indirect product sales is paid out to manufacturers as a cost of the product sales. In Fiscal 2017, we recorded a total of $6.6 million in revenues from these indirect product sales, of which a total of $5.1 million was paid to manufacturers or distributors as a cost of the product sales.Intellectual Property Rights

Trademarks

We hold various trademarks, including Cherokee®, Hi-Tec®, Magnum®, 50 Peaks®, Interceptor®, Hawk Signature®, Tony Hawk®, Liz Lange®, Completely Me by Liz Lange®, Flip Flop Shops®, Everyday California®, Carole Little®, Saint Tropez-West®, Chorus Line®, All That Jazz®, Sideout®, Sideout Sport®, and other, in connection withothers for numerous categories of apparel and other goods.  These trademarks are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and corresponding government agencies in a number of other countries. Wewe also hold trademarks or trademark applications for each of these brand names and others with similar government agencies in numerousa number of other countries.  Our trademark registrations typically expire after seven to ten years depending on the jurisdiction, although we intend, and expect to be able, to renew these trademarks for as long as we continue to use them.  Our business is dependent upon our trademarks and other intellectual property rights. We monitor on an ongoing basis unauthorized uses of our trademarks, and we monitor unauthorized uses of these trademarks on an ongoing basis.  In addition to trademarks, we also rely primarily upon a combination of trademarks,on know‑how, trade secrets and contractual restrictions to protect our intellectual property rights domestically and internationally. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for additional information.

Competition

Royalties paid to us under our licensing agreements are generally based on a percentage of our licensees’ net sales of licensed products. Additionally, franchisees of our Flip Flop Shops brand pay us a percentage of their net sales. Merchandise bearing our Cherokee, Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks, Interceptor, Hawk Signature, Tony Hawk, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Flip Flop Shops, Everyday California, Carole Little,brand names and Sideout brands, all of which are manufacturedgoods that we have developed and sold by both domestic and international wholesalers and retail licensees, as well as merchandise sold by Flip Flop Shops retail shops, are subject to extensive competition by numerous domestic and foreign companies. Such competitorsintense competition.  Competing brands with respect to theour Cherokee brand include Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Liz Claiborne, and private label brands (developed by retailers) such as Faded Glory, Arizona and Route 66.66, and competing brands with respect to the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands include Columbia, Merrell, Keen, North Face, Timberland, Bates, Wolverine and other private label brands.  Our other brands also face competition from these and other numerous brands.  Factors that shape the competitive environment for our brands include quality of garment or accessory construction and design, brand name, style and color selection, price, fashion and other trends, avenue of purchase (including in stores and online), and the manufacturer’s ability to respond quickly to the retailer on a national basis.and consumer demand.

Our business plan in the United States focuses on creating strategic alliances with major retailers and wholesalers for their sale of products bearing our brands through the licensing ofor products that we have developed and designed.  We license our trademarks directly to retailers, engagingand we engage wholesalers to manufacture and distribute products bearing our brands and sell these products to retailers.  We also develop and design products for retailers and entering into franchise relationships with Flip Flop Shops retail store owners.that prefer to sell products bearing their own brand names.  Therefore, our degree of success is dependent on the strength of our brands, consumer acceptance of and desire for our brands, our licensees’ ability to design, manufacture and sell products bearing our brands and our franchisees’licensees’ ability to sell products bearing our or third-party brands,we have developed and designed, all of which is dependent on the ability of us and our licensees and franchisees to respond to ever-changing consumer demands.  In addition, we compete with companies that own other brands and trademarks, as these companies owning established trademarks, which have entered into, and could continue to enter into similar licensing arrangements with retailers and wholesale manufacturerswholesalers in the United States and internationally, includinginternationally.  These arrangements could be with our existing retail and wholesale partners, thereby competing with us for consumer attention and limited floor andor rack space in the same stores in which our branded products are sold, and vying with us for the time and resources of the retailers and wholesale licensees that manufacture and distribute our products.

10


Table of Contents

Seasonality

Our business and performance may be subject to certaindo not reflect significant seasonality trends.  See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and AnalysisHowever, to the extent royalty revenues grow from our new wholesale licensees, we expect our revenues may shift toward the latter half of Financial Condition and Resultsour fiscal year, which would be consistent with the normal, holiday-based seasonal pattern of Operations,” for additional information.retail sales.

Government Regulations

The Federal Trade Commission and various state laws regulate our Flip Flop Shops franchising activities. For instance, the Federal Trade Commission requires that franchisors make extensive disclosure to prospective franchisees before the execution of a franchise agreement, and several states require registration and disclosure in connection with franchise offerings and sales. In addition, ourOur business practices in international markets are subject to the requirements of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) and any applicable foreign anti-bribery laws.  We are also subject to various laws that are generally applicable to businesses in our industry, such as work safety and labor laws that govern certain of our operations and our employee relations.  Our violation of any of these laws could subject us to significant fines, criminal sanctions and other penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

7


Table of Contents

Employees

As of January 28, 2017,February 1, 2020, we employed 123 persons; however, of these employees, 40 are providing transition services for us in connection with our recent acquisition of Hi-Tec and therefore are not expected to remain our employees for the longer term.37 persons.  None of our employees are represented by labor unions, and we believe that our employee relations are satisfactory.

Code of EthicsFinancial Information about Geographic Areas

We have adopted a Code of Business ConductApproximately 77% and Ethics that applies to the Company’s directors, officers, employees and manufacturers that produce products on behalf75% of our licensees. A copy ofrevenues were derived from our Code of Business Conductinternational licensees in Fiscal 2020 and Ethics is filed as an exhibitFiscal 2019, respectively, and we face risks related to this Annual Report.

Segment Information

As a result of the Hi-Tec acquisition, our reportable segments beginning Fiscal 2017 consist of Cherokee Global Brandsthese foreign operations.  See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for information about these risks, and Hi-Tec, for which our chief-operating decision maker internally evaluates operating performance and financial results. For the year ended January 30, 2016 we considered our business activities to constitute a single segment.  Seesee Note 1213 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for information about Cherokee Global Brands and Hi-Tec revenues, long lived assets and othercertain financial information as well as a summary of our revenues and long-lived assets by geographic area.

Also see our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for information about revenues from external customers, a measure of profit and loss and our total assets for our one reportable segment. We face risks attendant to our foreign operations. During Fiscal 2017, approximately 47% of our revenues were derived from our international licensees and franchisees.  We face risks attendant to our foreign operations.  See Item 1A, “Risk Factors”.General Information

Corporate Information and SEC Filings

CherokeeApex Global Brands was incorporated in Delaware in 1988.  Our principal executive offices are located at 5990 Sepulveda Boulevard, Sherman Oaks, California 91411, telephone (818) 908‑9868. We maintain a website with the address at www.apexglobalbrands.comwww.cherokeeglobalbrands.com. We are not including the information contained on, and our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

Nasdaq trading symbol is “APEX”.  We make our annual reports on Form 10‑K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8‑K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act available free of charge on our website at www.cherokeeglobalbrands.comas soon as reasonably practicable after we file these materials with, or furnish them to, the SEC.

All referencereferences to our website in this Annual Report are inactive textual references, and the contents of our website are not incorporated intoin or otherwise considered part of this Annual Report.

11


Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The table below sets forth certain information with respect to each of our executive officers. We have entered into employment agreements or offers with each of our executive officers, which are included as exhibits to this Annual Report, that establish, among other things, each executive’s term of office. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of our executive officers and any other person pursuant to which such individual was or is selected as an officer of our Company.

Name, Age and Positions with Cherokee

Principal Occupation for Past Five Years; Business Experience

Henry Stupp, 53
Chief Executive Officer,
Director

Mr. Stupp became our Chief Executive Officer in August 2010. Prior to joining Cherokee, Mr. Stupp was a co‑founder of Montreal-based Novel Teez Designs, later known as NTD Apparel USA LLC, a leading licensee of entertainment, character, sport and branded apparel and a supplier to many major North American retailers. Mr. Stupp served as President of NTD Apparel USA from 2005 until 2010. During his tenure with NTD Apparel USA, he successfully identified, negotiated, and introduced many well‑known licenses and brands to a broad retail audience. Mr. Stupp is currently serving a two-year term as a Director of the International Licensing Industry Merchandiser’s Association. Mr. Stupp attended Concordia University where he majored in Economics.

Howard Siegel, 62
President and Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Siegel has been employed by us since January 1996, starting as Vice President of Operations and Administration, becoming President in June 1998 and becoming Chief Operating Officer in January 2010. Prior to January 1996, Mr. Siegel had a long tenure in the apparel business industry working as a senior executive for Federated Department stores and Carter Hawley Hale Broadway stores. Mr. Siegel attended the University of Florida where he received his Bachelor of Science degree.

Jason Boling, 46
Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Boling became our Chief Financial Officer in March 2013. Prior to joining Cherokee, he was Vice President of Finance and Accounting at DTS Inc., a leader in high‑definition audio technologies and audio enhancement solutions, for over six years. For four years prior to his tenure with DTS, he was the Vice President and Corporate Controller at Inamed Corporation, a global manufacturer of medical devices, and he spent many years in public accounting, including with accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Boling has broad domestic and international experience in mergers & acquisitions, acquisition integration, strategic planning, budgeting, Sarbanes‑Oxley compliance and controls, investor relations and tax planning. Mr. Boling is a California certified public accountant, and he earned his bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from California State University, Northridge.

12


Table of Contents

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTORS

The occurrence of any of the risks, and uncertainties and other factors described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report and the other documents we file with the SEC could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price, and could also cause our future business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price to differ materially from our historical results and the results contemplated by any forward-looking statements we may make herein, in any other document we file with the SEC, or in any press release or other written or oral statement we may make.  You should carefully consider all of these risks and the other information in this Annual Report and the other documents we file with the SEC before making any investment decision with respect to our common stock.securities.  The risks described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report are not the only ones we face.  Additional risks we are not presently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business, financial condition and results of operations or cause our stock price to decline.

Risks Related to Our Business

We face risks related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related protective public health measures.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization recognized the outbreak of a novel coronavirus, COVID-19, as a pandemic.  Our business has been materially adversely affected by the effects of COVID-19 and the related protective public health measures. Our business depends upon purchases and sales of our branded products by our licensees, and the prevalence of shelter-in-place orders in the regions where our products are sold, together with the closure of many of our licensees’ or their customers’ stores, have resulted in significant declines in our royalties, which will likely continue for some period of time.  In response to the decline in revenues, we have implemented cost savings measures, including pay reductions, employee furloughs and other measures.  We can provide no assurance that these cost savings measures will not cause our business operations and results to suffer.  The decline and anticipated decline in our revenues also exposes us to the risk that we will remain non-compliant with the covenants in our credit facility, which creates risk that our lender will exercise its rights to accelerate the amounts payable and foreclose on our assets.  We have not been designated as an essential business, and therefore all of our employees are working remotely, which may result in inefficiencies and lost opportunities. In addition, the responses of the federal, international, state and regional governments to the pandemic, including the shelter-in-place orders and the allocation of healthcare resources to treating those infected with the virus, has caused and may continue to cause a significant decline in retail sales, including sales of our branded products by our licensees. Other adverse effects of the pandemic on our business could include disruptions or restrictions on our employees’ ability to travel, as well as temporary closures of the facilities of the manufacturers and distributors of our branded products, which could cause further or extended declines in sales and royalties. In addition, the continued spread of COVID-19, or the occurrence of other epidemics, could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets of many countries, resulting in an economic downturn that could affect demand for our branded products and further adversely impact our results of operations.

8


Table of Contents

There are numerous uncertainties associated with the coronavirus outbreak, including the number of individuals who will become infected, whether a vaccine or cure that mitigates the effect of the virus will be synthesized, and, if so, when such vaccine or cure will be ready to be used, and the extent of the protective and preventative measures that have been put in place by both governmental entities and other businesses and those that may be put in place in the future.  Any, or all, of the foregoing uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and/or cash flows.

Our business is subject to intense competition.

Royalties paid to us under our licensing agreements are generally based on a percentage of our licensees’ net sales of licensed products. Additionally, franchisees of our Flip Flop Shops brand pay us a percentage of their net sales. Merchandise bearing our Cherokee, Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks, Interceptor, Hawk Signature, Tony Hawk, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Flip Flop Shops, Everyday California, Carole Little,brand names and Sideout brands, all of which are manufacturedgoods that we have developed and sold by both domestic and international wholesalers and retail licensees, as well as merchandise sold by Flip Flop Shops retail shops,designed are subject to extensive competition by numerous domestic and foreign companies. Such competitorsintense competition.  Competing brands with respect to theour Cherokee brand include Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Liz Claiborne, and private label brands (developed by retailers) such as Faded Glory, Arizona Merona, and Route 66.66, and competing brands with respect to the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands include Columbia, Merrell, Keen, North Face, Timberland, Bates, Wolverine and other private label brands.  Our other brands also face competition from these and other numerous brands.  Factors that shape the competitive environment for our brands include quality of garment or accessory construction and design, brand name, style and color selection, price, fashion and other trends, avenue of purchase (including in stores and online), and the manufacturer’s ability to respond quickly to the retailer on a national basis.and consumer demand.

Our business plan in the United States focuses on creating strategic alliances with major retailers and wholesalers for their sale of products bearing our brands through the licensing of our trademarks directly to retailers, engaging wholesalers to manufacture and distribute products bearing our brands and sell these products to retailers, and entering into franchise relationshipsdesign services agreements with Flip Flop Shops retail store owners.retailers and wholesalers to develop and design products bearing the brands that those retailers and wholesalers own.  Therefore, our degree of success is dependent on the strength of our brands, consumer acceptance of and desire for our brands, our licensees’ ability to design, manufacture and sell products bearing our brands and our franchisees’other licensees’ ability to sell products bearing our or third-party brands,in their stores that we have developed and designed, all of which is dependent on the ability of us and our licensees and franchisees to respond to ever-changing consumer demands. Failures with respect to any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.  We cannot control the level of consumer acceptance of our brands and changing preferences and trends may lead customers to purchase other products.  Further, we cannot control the level of resources that our other licensees or franchisees commit to supporting ourtheir brands for which we have developed and ourdesigned product. Our licensees may choose to support products bearing other brands to the detriment of our brands because our agreements generally do not prevent our licenseesthem from licensing or selling other products, of third parties, including our competitors. products bearing competing brands. 

In addition, we compete with companies that own other brands and trademarks, as these companies owning established trademarks, which have entered into, and could continue to enter into similar licensing arrangements with retailers and wholesale manufacturerswholesalers in the United States and internationally, includinginternationally.  These arrangements could be with our existing retail and wholesale partners, thereby competing with us for consumer attention and limited floor andor rack space in the same stores in which our branded products are sold, and vying with us for the time and resources of the retailers and wholesale licensees that manufacture and distribute our products.  These companies may be able to respond more quickly to changes in retailer, wholesaler and consumer preferences and devote greater resources to brand acquisition, development and marketing.  We may not be able to compete effectively against these companies.

If we or our brands are unable to compete successfully against current and future competitors, we may be unable to sustain or increase demand for products bearing our brands, or we may be unable to develop and design products bearing brands owned by our licensees that compete successfully in the retail market place, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, prospects, performance and financial condition.

We are subject to the risks related toof the retail business that are applicableapply to retailers selling our licenseesand franchisees.products.

There are numerous risks and other factors applicable to the businesses of retailers (including our DTR licensees and franchisees)retailers to which our wholesale licensees distribute products) that can impact the sale of products that bear our brands and, with respect to our franchisees,other licensees, the sale of products bearing otherthat we have developed and designed that bear their brands from which we generate revenues.and are sold in their stores.  Any decline in retail sales by one or more of our licenseesbranded products or franchiseesproducts that we have designed for others could adversely affect our revenues.

13


Table of Contents

Factors that may adversely affect our licensees and franchiseesretailers and their sales of products include, the following, among others: (i) weather, environmental or other conditions that may impact consumer shopping activity in retail stores;the ongoing impacts of COVID-19; (ii) consumer preferences regarding fashion trends and styles, which can be region-dependent and subject to rapid and significant fluctuations; (iii) consumer preferences regarding where to shop; (iv) the growth of online shopping and the ability of our licensees and franchiseesa retailer to market and sell products through these avenues; (v) changes in the availability or cost of capital in light of the financial condition and capital requirements of our licensees and franchisees; (vi) shifts in the seasonality of shopping patterns; (vii) fluctuating retail prices; (viii)(vi) the reputation of or general consumer perceptions about the retailers that sell our brands; (vii) security breaches or other cybersecurity incidents; (viii) shifts in the seasonality of shopping patterns; (ix) weather, environmental or other conditions that may impact consumer shopping activity; (x) changes in the availability or cost of capital in light of a retailer’s financial condition, capital requirements and other factors; (xi) labor strikes or other interruptions that impact supply chains and transport vendors; (x)(xii) the impact of excessexcesses or shortages of retail or manufacturing capacity; (xi)(xiii) changes in the cost of accepting various payment

9


Table of Contents

methods and changes in the rate of utilization of these payment methods; (xii)(xiv) material acquisitions or dispositions; (xiii)(xv) investments in new business strategies; (xiv)(xvi) the success or failure of significant new business ventures or technologies; (xv)(xvii) general business and operational risks, including, among others, the ability to obtain and maintain desirable store locations, litigation risks, departures of key personnel or other employee matters; (xviii) actions taken or omitted to be taken by legislative, regulatory, judicial and other government authorities and officials; (xvi) security breaches; (xvii)(xix) natural disasters, the outbreak of war, acts of terrorism or other significant national or international events; and (xviii)(xx) the other risks discussed in this Item 1A.these risk factors.

We relyhave incurred a significant amount of indebtedness, our level of indebtedness and restrictions under our indebtedness could adversely affect our operations and liquidity, and we are currently in violation of certain financial covenants under our credit facility.

On August 3, 2018, we entered into a senior secured credit facility that provided a $40.0 million term loan, and $13.5 million of subordinated promissory notes.  The credit facility was amended on January 30, 2019 to provide an additional term loan of $5.3 million.  As of February 1, 2020, outstanding borrowings under the term loans were $44.1 million, and outstanding borrowings under subordinated promissory notes were $13.5 million.  The term loans mature in August 2021 and require quarterly principal payments and monthly interest payments based on LIBOR plus a margin.  The subordinated promissory notes mature in November 2021.  Interest is payable monthly on the accuracysubordinated promissory notes, but no periodic amortization payments are required.

The senior secured credit facility imposes various restrictions and covenants regarding the operation of our licensees’business, including covenants that require us to obtain the lender’s consent before we can, among other things and franchisees’ retail sales reports for reporting and collectingsubject to certain limited exceptions: (i) incur additional indebtedness or additional liens on our revenues, and if these reports are untimelyproperty; (ii) consummate acquisitions, dispositions, mergers or incorrect, our revenues could be delayed or inaccurately reportedor collected.

Mostconsolidations; (iii) make any change in the nature of our revenuesbusiness; (iv) enter into transactions with our affiliates; or (v) repurchase or redeem any outstanding shares of our common stock or pay dividends or other distributions, other than stock dividends, to our stockholders.  The senior secured credit facility also imposes financial covenants that set financial standards we are generated from retailers who license our brandsrequired to manufacturemaintain, including the requirement to maintain specified levels of Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement ($9.5 million for the trailing twelve months as of February 1, 2020), and sell products bearing our brands in their stores and on their websites. In addition, we havemaintain a numberminimum cash balance of franchise agreements with franchisees of the Flip Flop Shops brand and we have arrangements with several wholesalers who license our brands$1.0 million.  We are also required to manufacture products bearing our brands and sell these products to retailers. Under our existing agreements, these licensees and franchisees pay us fees based in part onmaintain a borrowing base comprising the value of products sold. We relyour trademarks that exceeds the outstanding balance of the term loan.  If the borrowing base is less than the outstanding term loan at any measurement period, then we would be required to repay a portion of the term loan to eliminate such shortfall.  Further, as collateral for the credit facility, we have granted a first priority security interest in favor of the lender in substantially all of our assets (including trademarks), and our indebtedness is guaranteed by our subsidiaries. If we do not comply with these requirements or if there is a change of control of the Company, it would be an event of default.

Our operating results for the twelve months ended November 2, 2019 and February 1, 2020 resulted in violations of the minimum Adjusted EBITDA covenant, which were events of default.  However, our senior lender has agreed to forbear from enforcing its rights under the senior secured credit facility through July 27, 2020.  Our financial projections indicate that there is a significant risk of further violations of the minimum Adjusted EBITDA covenant or minimum cash covenant beyond the forbearance period agreed to with our senior lender.  If any such future violation or other event of default occurs under the credit facility that is not forborne, cured or waived in accordance with the terms of the credit facility, we would be subject to significant risks, including the right of our lender to terminate its obligations under the credit facility, declare all or any portion of the borrowed amounts then outstanding to be accelerated and due and payable, and/or exercise any other right or remedies it may have under applicable law, including foreclosing on our licenseesand/or our subsidiaries’ assets that serve as collateral for the borrowed amounts.  Furthermore, a default under our term loan agreement would also trigger a default under our subordinated promissory note agreements, which would give those lenders the right to terminate their obligations under the subordinated promissory note agreements and franchisees to accurately reportaccelerate the retail sales in collecting our license and franchise fees, preparing our financial reports, projections and budgets, and directing our sales and marketing efforts. Allpayment of our license and franchise agreements permit us to audit our licensees and franchisees.those promissory notes.  If any of these rights were to be exercised, our licensee or franchisee reports understate the retail sales of products they sell, we may not collectfinancial condition and recognize revenues to which we are entitled on a timely basis or at all, or may endure significant expense to obtain compliance.

We utilize various licensing and selling models in our operations, and our success is dependent on our ability to manage these different models.

In addition to our historical focus onour Direct to Retail licensing model,  we recently commenced franchisecontinue operations with our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand and we intend to grow this business in the future, and we also recently entered into several new licensing arrangements with wholesalers and may seek to enter into additional wholesale arrangements in the future. Even though our pursuits of these wholesale and franchise models may diversify our sources of revenue, these models could themselveswould be unsuccessful and could divert management’s attention and other resources, including time and capital, from our historical focus on our Direct to Retail licensing strategy. As a result, our future success depends in part on our ability to successfully manage these multiple licensing and selling models.

materially jeopardized.  If we are unable to manage our wholesalemeet obligations to lenders and franchise arrangements together with our Directother creditors, we may have to Retail licensing model, then our financial conditionsignificantly curtail or even cease operations.  We are evaluating potential sources of working capital, including the disposition of certain assets, and prospects would be harmed.

Our business is dependent onwe believe that certain provisions of the successCARES Act passed by the U.S. Congress in March 2020 will result in additional liquidity.  We recently received proceeds of $0.7 million from a promissory note issued by one of our Directbanks under the Paycheck Protection Program included in the CARES Act, and the NOL carryback provisions of the CARES Act are expected to Retail licensing model.result in federal refund claims of approximately $8.0 million.  Our plans also include the evaluation of strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value.  However, there is no assurance that we will be able to execute these plans or continue to operate as a going concern.

Although we have recently commenced franchise operations and have pursued additional wholesale licensing arrangements, we have historically been focused on our Direct to Retail licensing model and it continues to be an important part of our operations. In Direct to Retail licensing, we grant retailers a license to use our trademarks on certain categories of merchandise. We believe the Direct to Retail licensing model has become more widely accepted by many retailers worldwide, and our business plan is based on the continued success of this model with our current licensees and with new retailers we may solicit to license our brands in new territories and additional product categories as we seek to expand this part of our business. However, our expectations regarding the Direct to Retail licensing model10

14


Table of Contents

may turn outAdditionally, even if we are able to be wrong,avoid a further event of default under the credit facility, the amount of our outstanding indebtedness, which is substantial, could have an adverse effect on our operations and liquidity, including by, among other things: (i) making it more difficult for us to pay or refinance our debts as they become due during adverse economic and industry conditions, because we may not growhave sufficient cash flows to make our scheduled debt payments; (ii) causing us to use a larger portion of our cash flows to fund interest and principal payments, thereby reducing the availability of cash to fund working capital, product development, capital expenditures and other business activities; (iii) making it more difficult for us to take advantage of significant business opportunities, such as acquisition opportunities or other strategic transactions, and to react to changes in market or industry conditions; and (iv) limiting our ability to borrow additional monies in the future to fund the activities and expenditures described above and for other general corporate purposes as and when needed, which could force us to suspend, delay or curtail business prospects, strategies or operations.

Our future capital needs may be uncertain, and we may need to raise additional funds in the future, which may not be available when needed, on acceptable terms or at all.

Our capital requirements in future periods may be uncertain and could depend on many factors, including, among others: (i) acceptance of, and demand for, our brands; (ii) the extent to which we invest in our existing brand portfolio or any new brands; (iii) the number and timing of our acquisitions and other strategic transactions; (iv) the costs of developing new brands; (v) the costs associated with our efforts to expand our business; and (vi) the costs of litigation and enforcement activities to protect and defend our trademarks.  We may need to raise additional funds to meet our capital requirements.  However, these or any other necessary funds may not be available when needed, on favorable terms or at all.  If we issue equity or convertible debt securities to raise additional funds, as we anticipate.did with our refinancing of our senior secured credit facility in August 2018 and additional borrowings under our new facility in January 2019, our existing stockholders may experience dilution and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders.  If we incur additional debt to raise funds, as we did with our senior secured credit facility, we may become over-leveraged, and we may become subject to restrictive financial or operating covenants that could limit our ability to operate our business and expose us to significant risks in the event of any compliance failure.  Moreover, in light of our current level of indebtedness, which is significant, additional debt or potential future retail licensees doequity capital may not perceive our Directbe available on terms we consider advantageous or favorable to Retail licensing modelus.  In addition, we may seek equity and/or debt financing from sources that expose us to be advantageous to them, then they may move away from this model and instead embrace alternatives,additional risks or negative effects, such as, purchasingfor example, obtaining funding from wholesalersrelated parties in transactions that create conflicts of interest between us and the related party, as we did with our arrangement of purchases by certain of our directors, officers and large stockholders of participation interests in our credit facility in December 2017 and the exchange of those participation interests into junior subordinated notes in our new credit facility in August 2018.  Further, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital-raising transactions, including investment banking, legal and accounting fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs.

If we cannot raise funds when needed, on acceptable terms or manufacturing private label products. Such a change in perception could occur for a variety of reasons, including reasons based on retailers’ beliefs or expectations thatat all, we may not turn outbe able to be accurate.

Ifdevelop or enhance our Direct to Retail licensing model ceases to be attractive to retailers, then we would be unable to continue to pursue this aspect ofbrand portfolio or marketing initiatives, execute our business plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures or customer requirements.  Any of these outcomes may materially harm our business, results of operations and our financial condition and performance could suffer material adverse effects.

Our business has historically been largely dependent on royalties from Target, which no longer sells Cherokee branded products.

Until January 31, 2017, Target had exclusive rights to Cherokee branded products for all product categories in the United States. Royalty revenues from Target’s sales of Cherokee branded products accounted for greater than 35% of our total revenues during each of Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015. However, our license agreement with Target covering sales of most Cherokee branded products in the United States expired on January 31, 2017. Our license agreement with Target covering sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category will expire at the end of its current term on January 31, 2018, and will continue to generate revenues to us until its expiration.

Replacing the royalty revenues received from Target for Cherokee branded products is a significant challenge, and we might not be successful in doing so. Even though we have entered into arrangements with wholesale licensees for sales of Cherokee branded products in the United States, which became operational at the beginning of Fiscal 2018, any increased revenues we may receive from these new wholesale licensees or any other licensees or franchisees may not be sufficient to offset the lost royalty revenues from Target. If we are not successful in replacing the Target’s royalty revenues with equal or greater royalties from other partners the termination of this license agreement could have a material adverse effect upon our revenues and cash flows.

We acquired the Liz Lange brand in part based upon our expectation that revenues from Target for this brand would grow in future periods, although such revenue growth may never occur. Target has informed us that it has elected to not renew the Liz Lange license agreement, which expires on January 31, 2018 at the end of the current term, Target will continue to pay royalties to Cherokee Global Brands until the expiration of the agreement.  Cherokee Global Brands has entered into a master license agreement with a third party for Liz Lange branded maternity products beginning in Fiscal 2019.condition.

Our wholesale licensing arrangements subject us to a number of risks.

In our wholesale licensing relationships, we license our brands to manufacturers that produce and import various categories of apparel, footwear, home products and accessories under our trademarks and sell the licensed products to retailers. We have some historical wholesale licensees with respect to some of our brands and we have recently entered into several new wholesale arrangements primarily covering our newly acquired Hi-Tec and Magnum brands and sales of products bearing our Cherokee brand in the United States. We believe these arrangements signalconnection with a significant shift in our business strategy, for sales of products bearing the Cherokee brand in the United States, which in the past have been governed byfrom our historical focus on a DTR license agreement.licensing model to a substantially greater focus on wholesale licensing for many of our key brands.  Although we believe these newour wholesale licensing arrangements will helpmay have certain benefits, these arrangements are subject to diversifya number of risks and our sources of revenue and licensee or other partner relationships and will provide additional avenues to obtain brand recognition and grow our Company, these expectationsbeliefs could turn out to be wrong.  If any of these risks occur and we do not achieve the intended or expected benefits of theseour strategy shift toward wholesale arrangements, our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.  Moreover, we have less experience with the wholesale licensing model than the DTR licensing model and we may find it difficult to develop reliable forecasts and expectations regarding royalty revenues from these arrangements, either of which could harm our business and our operating results.

The terms of our wholesale licensing arrangements differ in certain important ways from the terms of our DTR licensing arrangements.  For instance, the minimum annual royalty obligations under our wholesale licenselicensing arrangements are significantly smaller than the minimum annual royalty obligations in some of our Direct to RetailDTR licensing arrangements, including our former license agreement with Target and our license agreement with Kohl’s.arrangements.  Also, our new wholesale license

15


Table of Contents

agreements for the Cherokee brand and the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands are not subject to reducing royalty rates based on cumulative sales levels, as was our former license agreement with Target for the Cherokee brand.  As we begin to recognize revenues from these new wholesale licensees and toThese different terms could have a material impact on our performance.  For example, the extent we pursue similar wholesale arrangements in the future, their lower minimum royalty obligations and consistent royalty rates of these wholesale licensing arrangements could cause our performance and cash flows to be more strongly influenced by the seasonality of the retail business and thus subject to more material fluctuations between periods, and the lower minimum royalty obligations could also cause our aggregate annual royalty revenues to decline if retail sales volume for our brands decreases and we become dependent uponon minimum royalty obligations.  These effects on our performance could become increasingly significant in future periods, to the extent our new wholesale licensees gain traction over time with new retailers and consumer bases and the proportion of our royalty revenues from these licensees increases, or if we pursue similar wholesale arrangements in the future.

11


Table of Contents

Additionally, in wholesale licensing arrangements, we have limited ability to control various aspects of the manufacturing process, including access to raw materials, the timing of delivery of finished products, the quality of finished products and manufacturing costs.  Our wholesale licensees may not be able to produce finished products of the quality or in the quantities that are sufficient to meet retailer and consumer demand in a timely manner or at all, which could result in an inability to generate revenuerevenues from any such products and loss of retailer confidence in our brands.  Interruptions or delays in the manufacturing process can occur at any time and for a variety of reasons, many of which are outside our control, including, among others, unforecasted spikes in demand, shortages of raw materials, labor disputes, backlogs, insufficient devotion of resources to the manufacture of products bearing our brands, or problems that may arise with manufacturing operations or facilities or our wholesale licensees’ businesses generally.  On the other hand, our wholesale licensees may produce inventory in excess of retailer and consumer demand, in which case over-supply may cause retail prices of products bearing our brands to decline.  Additionally, there may be delays in the manufacturing process over which we may have no control, including shortages of raw materials, labor disputes, backlogs or insufficient devotion of resources to the manufacture of products bearing our brands. Further, we compete with other brand owners for the time and resources of our wholesale distributors,licensees, which could curtail or limit our ability to engage new or maintain relationships with existing wholesale licensee partners on acceptable terms or at all. Interruptions in the supply of products bearing our brands to retailers or lapses in quality could adversely impact our reputation and financial condition.  Further, the unplanned loss of any of our wholesale licensees could lead to inadequate market coverage for retail sales of products bearing our brands, create negative impressions of us and our brands with retailers and consumers, and add downward pricing pressure on prices of products bearing our brands as a result of liquidating a former wholesaler’s inventory of such products.  The occurrence of any of these risks could adversely impact our reputation, performance and financial condition.

RevenuesWe rely on the accuracy of our licensees’ sales reports for reporting and collecting our royalty revenues, and if these reports are untimely or incorrect, our revenues could be delayed or inaccurately reported or collected

Most of our royalty revenues are generated from retailers that manufacture and sell products bearing our Hawk Signaturebrands in their stores and Tony Hawkon their websites, and from wholesalers that manufacture and distribute products bearing our brands largely dependand sell these products to retailers.  In addition, we generate revenues from licensees that sell products that we have developed and designed.  Under our existing agreements, our licensees pay us fees based on Kohl’stheir sales of products or, for Fiscal 2018.some of our wholesale licensees, based on their manufacturing costs.  As a result, we rely on our licensees to accurately report their sales or costs in collecting our license and design fees, preparing our financial reports, projections and budgets and directing our sales and marketing efforts.  Although all of our agreements permit us to audit our licensees, if any of them understate their sales or costs, we may not collect and recognize the royalty revenues to which we are entitled on a timely basis or at all, or we may endure significant expense to obtain compliance.

We utilize various licensing and selling models in our operations, and our success is dependent on our ability to manage these different models.

In January 2014,addition to the DTR licensing model, we acquired the Hawk Signaturealso focus some of our key brands on a wholesale licensing strategy, and Tony Hawk brands. Concurrently with this acquisition, we entered intouse a retail license agreement with Kohl’s, pursuantproduct development and design model for brands owned by others.  Although we believe these various licensing and design models could have certain benefits, these models could themselves be unsuccessful and our beliefs could turn out to which Kohl’s is granted the exclusive right to sell Tony Hawkbe wrong.  Moreover, our pursuit of these different models could divert management’s attention and Hawk-branded apparelother resources, including time and related products in the United States. We agreed to this exclusive licensecapital.  As a result, our future success depends in part on our ability to successfully manage these multiple licensing and design models.  If we are unable to do so, our performance, financial condition and prospects could be materially harmed.

Our business continues to depend in part on the success of our Direct to Retail licensing model.

Our DTR licensing model continues to be an important part of our operations.  We believe the DTR licensing model has become more widely accepted by many retailers worldwide, and our business plan is based uponin part on the success of this model with our expectation that revenues from Kohl’s for theseexisting retail licensees and with new retailers we may solicit to license our brands will growunder this model in future periods, although this expectationnew territories and additional product categories.  However, our beliefs regarding the DTR licensing model may turn out to be wrong, and it may not achieve or sustain increased acceptance or its use by retailers could decline.  If our existing or potential future retail licensees do not perceive the DTR licensing model to be advantageous to them, which could occur for a variety of reasons, they may move away from this model and pursue alternatives, such revenue growthas purchasing from wholesalers or manufacturing private label products.  In that event, this aspect of our business may never occur beyond the $4.6 million minimum annual royalty payment required under the license agreement, as amended.prove unsuccessful and our financial condition and performance could suffer material adverse effects.

12


Table of Contents

The failure of our licensees or franchisees to sell products bearing our brands or that otherwise generate royalties to us,to pay us royalties for such productspursuant to their license agreements with us, or to renew their license or franchisethese agreements with us could result in a decline innegatively affect our results of operations.operations and financial condition.

Our revenues are dependent on royalty payments made to us under our license and franchisedesign services agreements.  Although thesome of our license agreements for our brands in many cases provide for guaranteedguarantee a minimum royalty paymentspayment to us each year, the failure of our licensees or franchisees to satisfy theirthese or the other obligations under their agreements with us, their decision to not renew their agreements with us or their inability to grow or maintain their sales of products bearing our brands or their businesses generally could cause our revenues to suffer.decline.  These events or circumstances could occur for a variety of reasons, many of which are outside our control, including business and operational risks that impact our licensees’ ability to make payments and sell products generally, such as obtaining and maintaining desirable store locations and consumer acceptance and presence; retaining key personnel, including the specific individuals who work on sales and marketing for products bearing our brands; and liquidity and capital resources risks.  Further, while we historically have been dependent on our relationships with Target and Kohl’s, the failure by any of our other key licensees or the concurrent failure by several of our other material licensees or franchisees to meet their financial obligations to us or to renew their respective license or franchise agreements with us could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and our financial condition.

Our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands and conversion of these brands to a new business model is subject to significant risks.

We acquired the Hi-Tec, Magnum and other associated footwear brands in December 2016. Before our acquisition, the Hi-Tec brands were operated under a full spectrum distribution model, meaning that one group of affiliated companies owned the brands and manufactured the products. In connection with our acquisition of these brands, we sold the associated operating assets to certain operating partners and/or distributors and entered into new

16


Table of Contents

wholesale licensing arrangements with these operating partners and/or distributors. Through these transactions and our post-acquisition integration efforts, we are converting the Hi-Tec brands to a branded licensing model. Going forward, we primarily intend to pursue a wholesale licensing model for these brands.

The acquisition of these brands and our conversion of their distribution model to align with our brand licensing model are subject to significant risks, as these brands have not historically been marketed, distributed and sold in this manner and it is uncertain whether this model will be effective for these brands. As a result, we are not able to reliably forecast or predict the impact of these brands on our revenues or other aspects of our results of operations. Further, the roles and responsibilities of the parties in the distribution chain for these products, including our Company, as the licensor of the brands and overseer of high-level marketing strategies, the wholesalers we engage to manufacture and distribute products bearing these brands, and the retailers to which the wholesalers sell these products for ultimate resale to consumers, will be different following our conversion of these brands to our brand licensing model. The wholesalers we have engaged for these brands to date, which consist of former operating partners and/or distributors of these brands, may not be familiar with or accustomed to our brand licensing model and may not be successful in converting their distribution efforts to align with this model. Further, as we make efforts to expand these brands to new geographic and consumer markets, we expect to pursue new arrangements with additional wholesale licensees for these brands. However, as with any effort to expand into new markets, any new wholesalers we may engage in the future for these brands, as well as the retailers and consumers they reach, may not be familiar with the brands and may not accept them. Any such outcome could result in failures to sell products bearing these brands in volumes and at prices that generate expected levels of revenue to us.

Additional risks associated with our acquisition of these brands include, among others, the following: (i) we expect our strategy for these brands to focus on wholesale licensing, and as a result, our efforts to build this brand will be subject to all of the risks associated with wholesale arrangements, including our dependence on third parties that we do not control, our lack of significant experience with wholesale arrangements and the other risks of wholesale licensing discussed elsewhere in these risk factors; (ii) the geographic scope of these brands is more significant than many of our other brands, and as a result, these operations will amplify the risks related to the international scope of our business, including less effective and less predictable protection and enforcement of our intellectual property in some jurisdictions and the other risks associated with our international operations discussed elsewhere in these risk factors; (iii) our conversion of the business model for these brands will require significant efforts, costs and other resources, which will divert attention from our other brands and could cause the performance of our other brands to suffer; and (iv) the acquisition of these brands has already involved significant time and costs, including the cash purchase price for the assets and our other expenses associated with the transaction, which has forced us to increase our debt levels and use significant amounts of cash on-hand and which puts significant pressure on our liquidity, particularly in light of the risks associated with our ability to manage and grow these brands under a new licensing model.

In light of the significance of the risks related to our acquisition of the Hi-Tec, Magnum and associated footwear brands and our efforts to convert their distribution model, we may fail to achieve the intended benefits of our acquisition of these brands and we may never generate sufficient royalty revenues from these brands to recoup their costs. If any of these outcomes were to occur, our performance, financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.

Our indirect product sales of products bearing the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands involve risks, including certain collection and credit risks and decreased comparability of our operating results.

Since our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands in December 2016, we have been indirectly selling footwear bearing these brands to certain select wholesalers and government entities that are customers of these brands. In these relationships, the purchasers of the products place their product orders directly with us, which we then forward to a manufacturer for the manufacture and delivery of the products directly to the original purchaser. The wholesalers and government entities that purchase products under these arrangements submit payments directly to us for their product orders, the amount of which is typically determined based on a pre-established percentage mark-up to our cost, and we then pay the manufacturer of the purchased products for the cost of the order. As a result, we retain a percentage of the payments made to us by wholesalers and government entities.  In Fiscal 2017, we recorded a total of $6.6 million in

17


Table of Contents

revenues from these indirect product sales, of which a total of $5.1 million was paid to manufacturers or distributors as a cost of the product sales.

Due to the payment structure for these arrangements, a significant portion of our revenues from indirect product sales is paid out to manufacturers as a cost of the product sales. Since the cost portion of these revenues, representing the product cost, are not retained by us, they are recorded as costs of goods sold in our consolidated financial statements and do not significantly increase our operating net income (loss). As a result, for as long as we maintain these indirect product sale arrangements, we may record increased revenues that do not materially increase our operating income (loss). The addition of indirect product sales to our business model, which has historically been exclusively focused on licensing and franchising relationships, could substantially reduce the comparability of our results of operations across periods and render such comparisons less meaningful.

In addition, although the product purchasers in these arrangements receive products directly from the manufacturer, which is similar to our wholesale licensing relationships, our indirect role in these product sales does not completely remove us from certain risks related to the manufacture and delivery of the products. For instance, since we are between the purchaser and the manufacturer in the product payment cycle, the wholesalers and government entities that purchase products under these arrangements may hold us financially responsible for product delivery failures or other similar events. Additionally, since these arrangements place us in direct contact, either through product order placement or receipt or payment of funds, with both the customer and the manufacturer of the products, we may be subject to increased credit risks based on these relationships. Moreover, serving as an intermediary between product customers and product manufacturers with respect to order placement and payment, and our role as such may expose us to additional risks of which we are not presently aware or we may not be able to effectively serve in this role. Further, although we intend to convert these indirect product sale arrangements to traditional direct or wholesale licensing relationships as the existing arrangements expire, the wholesalers and government entities with which we maintain these arrangements may not be amenable to a such a licensing relationship, in which case we could lose these customers or be required to maintain business relationships that would change our present business model. The occurrence of any of these risks could adversely affect our customer relationships and our performance.

Our franchise business exposes us to numerous risks.

In connection with our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand in October 2015, we acquired, and became the franchisor under, a number of franchise agreements with franchisees of this brand. Many of these franchisees maintain one or more Flip Flop Shops retail stores located across the globe, including in the United States, Canada, the Caribbean, the Middle East and South Africa. This new Flip Flop Shops franchise business exposes us to a variety of risks, including, among others, that: (i) we may not be able to find capable and experienced franchisees who can implement the Flip Flop Shops brand concept and strategies we believe are necessary for the future growth of this brand or sell merchandise and operate stores in a manner consistent with our standards and requirements; (ii) even if we are able to attract capable franchise owners, these franchisees may not be able to open new Flip Flop Shops retail stores in a timely manner or manage and maintain them once opened, secure desirable site locations, obtain adequate financing, construct and develop new store locations without delays and attract qualified operating personnel; (iii) the third party brands that are sold at Flip Flop Shops stores could decline in popularity or decide to stop selling their merchandise at some or all of the Flip Flop Shops store locations; (iv) neighborhood or economic conditions or other demographic patterns where existing or new Flip Flop Shops stores are located could decline or otherwise change in a negative way; and (v) our franchise business is subject to complex and varying franchise laws and regulations imposed by the U.S. federal, state and foreign jurisdictions in which we operate, and we may need to devote significant costs and resources in order to learn and comply with these laws and regulations and we may be subject to various penalties, including monetary fines or other sanctions if we fail to comply with these laws and regulations. If any of these risks were to materialize, the reputation of the Flip Flop Shops brand or our other brands could be damaged, sales volume at one or more Flip Flop Shops store locations could decline, existing store locations may close or new may store locations may fail to open at expected rates or at all, the Flip Flop Shops brand name may not grow as we anticipate, or our franchise revenues relating to this brand could be limited, curtailed or reduced, any of which could harm our performance and prospects.

18


Table of Contents

Our business may be negatively impacted by general economic conditions.

Our performance is subject to worldwide economic conditions and the corresponding impact on levels of consumer spending, which may affect our licensees’ and franchisees’ retail sales.  It is difficult to predict future levels of consumer spending, and any such predictions are inherently uncertain.  Many factors affect the level of consumer spending in the apparel industries,industry in which we operate, including, among others, prevailing economic conditions,conditions; levels of employment, salaries and wage rates,rates; energy costs,costs; interest rates,rates; the availability of consumer credit, taxationcredit; tax rates; and consumer confidence in future economic conditions.  Further, the worldwide apparelour industry is heavily influenced by general economic cycles. Purchasescycles, as purchases of apparel, footwear, accessories and accessorieshome products tend to decline in periods of recession or uncertainty regarding future economic prospects, as disposable income typically declines. As a result, during periods of economic uncertainty, slowdown or recession because disposable income typically declines during these periods.  As a result, the risks associated with our business are generally more acute.acute in these periods.  For instance, general uncertainty in U.S. economic, political, regulatory, and market conditions has increased following the results of the 2016 U.S. presidential election due to the unpredictability of the policies and direction of the newcurrent administration, and these uncertainties may result in decreased confidence in the U.S. or global economy and decreased levels of consumer spending.  In addition to decreased consumer spending generally, these periods of uncertainty, slowdown or recession may be accompanied by decreased demand for, or additional downward pricing pressure on, the products carrying our brands.  Accordingly, any prolonged economic slowdown, a lengthy or severe recession or any other negative trend in either the U.S. or the global economy iswould likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and business prospects.

We are subject to additional risks associated with the international scope of our operations.

Many of our licensees and franchisees are located outside the United States, asand we franchise our Flip Flop Shops brand and market and license our other brands outside the United States. As a key component of our business strategy, we intendaim to expand our international sales as well as the support we provide our international licensees and franchisees. During Fiscal 2017, approximately 37% of our revenues were derived from our international licensees and franchisees.revenues. In addition, our business associated with our newly acquired Hi-Tec family of footwear brands is managedwe have subsidiaries and operated by our Dutch subsidiary that we formed for the purpose of the acquisition.employees in Amsterdam.

We face numerous risks in doing business outside the United States, including, among others: (i) the ongoing worldwide impacts of COVID-19; (ii) our general lack of experience operating foreign subsidiaries, (ii)subsidiaries; (iii) unusual, unfamiliar or burdensome foreign laws or regulatory requirements, including tax, labor, contract, intellectual property protection and other laws, and unexpected changes to these laws or requirements; (iii)(iv) difficulties complying with the laws of multiple jurisdictions; (iv)(v) uncertainties in some jurisdictions related to developing legal and regulatory systems and standards for economic and business activities, property ownership and the application of contract rights; (v)(vi) tariffs, trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements, trade embargos, and other trade barriers, about which there is increased uncertainty following the results of the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the trade policies of the newcurrent administration, including withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and proposed revision to the North American Free Trade Agreement; (vi)(vii) difficulties in attracting and retaining qualified personnel to conduct our foreign operations or manage our foreign licensees and franchisees; (vii)(viii) challenges relating to labor and employment matters, including differing employment practices and requirements regarding health, safety and other working conditions in foreign jurisdictions; (viii)(ix) competition from foreign companies; (ix)(x) longer accounts receivable collection cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable; (x)receivable from international licensees and franchisees; (xi) less effective and less predictable protection and enforcement of our intellectual property rights in some jurisdictions; (xi)(xii) changes in the political or economic condition of a specific country or region, particularly in emerging markets; (xii)(xiii) potentially adverse tax consequences from the several U.S. and foreign jurisdictions in which we are subject to taxation; and (xiii)(xiv) cultural differences in the conduct of business.  Any one or more of suchthese factors could cause our future international salesrevenues to decline or could cause us to fail to execute on our business strategy involving international expansion.  In addition, our business practices in international markets are subject to the requirements of the Foreign Corrupt Practices ActFCPA and applicable foreign anti-bribery laws, any violation of which could subject us to significant fines, criminal sanctions and other penalties.

Additionally, and because the majority13


Table of ourContents

Our international revenue isroyalty revenues are typically denominated in U.S. dollars,dollars.  However, because our international licensees and franchisees operate in other currencies, fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to thethese foreign currencies of our international licensees’ or franchisees’ operations may negativelyhave an impact on our royalty revenues.revenues, which could materially affect our results of operations and cash flows.  The mainprimary foreign currencies we encounter in which our operationslicensees operate are the

19


Table of Contents

Mexican Peso, the EURO, Euro, the Great British Pound, the Mexican Peso, the South African Rand, the Japanese Yen, the Chinese Yuan, the Indian Rupee and the Canadian Dollar.  We do not currently engage in currency hedging activities to limit the risk of exchange rate fluctuations.

WeSome of our licensees have contracts with government entities that are subject to unique risks.

WeSome of our licensees for our Hi-Tec family of footwear brands have, and expect to maintain, long-term contracts with various foreign government entities, which primarily relate to our Hi-Tec family of footwear brands.entities.  In addition to normal business risks, including the other risks discussed in these risk factors, our licensees’ contracts with government entities are often subject to unique risks, some of which are beyond our or their control.  For instance, long-term government contracts and related orders are subject to cancellation if adequate appropriations for subsequent performance periods are not made.  As a result, the termination of funding for a government program supporting any of our licensees’ government contracts could result in a loss of anticipated future revenue attributable torevenues from that contract, which could have a negative impact on our operations.operations because our royalty revenues from the licensee attributable to the government contract would also cease.  In periods of global or local political tension or unrest or decreased spending, these risks could be amplified.  In addition, government entities with which we contract are often able to modify, curtail or terminate contracts with us at their convenience and without prior notice and would only be required to pay for work completed and commitments made at the time of the termination.  Any such modification, curtailment or termination of significant government contracts products bearing our Hi-Tec family of footwear brands could have a material adverse effect on our licensees’ sales of these products, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business and the success of our products could be harmed if we are unable to maintain the strength of our brands.

Our success to date has been due in large part tois dependent on the strength of our brands.  If we are unable to timely and appropriately respond to changingchanges to consumer demand,preferences and demands, which are subject to significant fluctuations, the strength of our brands may be impaired.  Even if we do react timely and appropriately to these changes, in consumer preferences, consumers may still consider one or more of our brands to be outdated or associate one or more of our brandsassociated with styles that are no longer popular.  In the past, many apparel companies in our industry have experienced periods of rapid growth in sales and earningsrevenues followed by periods of declining sales and losses.  Our business may be similarly affected in the future.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which could adversely affect our business and reputation and could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial results.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. As disclosed in Item 9A of this Annual Report, management has identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result of these material weaknesses, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of January 28, 2017. This conclusion could cause investors to lose confidence in the reliability of our reported financial information, which could result in a significant decline in the market price of our common stock. Additionally, our reputation with lenders, retailers, investors, securities analysts and others may be adversely affected. Moreover, these effects could continue even after we have determined that the identified material weaknesses are remediated.

Although we have developed and initiated a remediation plan designed to address the material weaknesses we have identified, this plan may not be fully implemented in a timely or effective manner, the remedial measures included in the plan will involve significant time and costs and will distract management from our core business operations, and these remedial measures could be insufficient to address the material weaknesses. In addition, even if we are successful in strengthening our controls and procedures, these controls and procedures may not be adequate in future periods and additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control could occur or be discovered. If any of these risks were to occur, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results. Any such restatement could lead to substantial additional costs for accounting and legal fees and litigation, significant reputational harm and material declines in our stock price.

20


Table of Contents

Compliance with changing securities laws, regulations and financial reporting standards could increase our costs and pose challenges for our management team, and any compliance failures could materially harm our business.

Existing laws, regulations, listing requirements and other standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure significantly increase the costs and risks associated with operating as a publicly traded company in the United States. Our management team devotes significant time and financial resources to try to comply with existing and evolving standards for public companies. However, notwithstanding our efforts, we have failed to comply with the SEC’s reporting deadlines applicable to this Annual Report, and it is possible that additional financial and other public reports we are obligated to file in the future also may not be considered timely, accurate or complete. In order to re-establish compliance with our public reporting requirements, we intend to hire additional personnel, engage consultants or other third-party advisors and change our internal practices, standards and policies, which could significantly increase our costs and divert management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities. In addition, noncompliance with these reporting requirements could subject us to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC, which could involve fines or other penalties, and could also adversely affect our financial results, result in a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial information and other public disclosures and jeopardize the listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, as described below. If any of these risks were to occur, our business and reputation could be materially adversely affected and the market price of our common stock could materially decline.

Further, the SEC has passed, promulgated or proposed new rules on a variety of subjects, including, for example, with respect to the preparation and filing of financial statements, establishment or disclosure of clawback and hedging policies and disclosure of executive compensation information. The existence of new and proposed laws and regulations relating to financial reporting or other disclosure obligations or that impose additional or more stringent compliance requirements could create uncertainties for public companies, make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified executive officers and members of our Board of Directors, particularly to serve on our audit and compensation committees, and generate significantly increased costs if we are required to add additional accounting or other staff, engage consultants or change our internal practices in order to comply with the new requirements. The occurrence of any of these outcomes could significantly harm our business, financial condition and performance.

We are dependent on our intellectual property rights, especially our trademarks, and we may not be able to successfully protect our rights, or we may become involved in costly legal proceedings regarding our intellectual propertyrelating to these rights or the intellectual property rights of third parties.

Our trademarks are vital to our business.  We hold various trademarks for our brands, including Cherokee, Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks, Interceptor, Hawk Signature, Tony Hawk, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Flip Flop Shops, Everyday California, Carole Little, Sideout and others in connection with apparel, footwear, home and accessories. These trademarks are vital to the success and future growth of our business. These trademarksbrand names, which are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and corresponding government agencies in numerous other countries and weOffice.  We also hold trademarks or trademark applications for these brandsour brand names with similar government agencies in a number of other countries, although the laws of many countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States and, as a result, adequate protection in these jurisdictions may be unavailable or limited. These actions taken by uslimited in spite of our efforts to safeguard these rights.  In addition, our efforts to establish and protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights might not prevent imitation of our brands or products bearing our brands, other infringement of our intellectual property rights, by unauthorized parties or other challenges to our intellectual property ownership, or prevent the loss of licensinglicense or franchise revenuerevenues or other damages caused thereby, including a reductionnegative effects.  Further, any insufficiency in the protection of our trademarks and other intellectual property rights could reduce the value of our licenses thatbrands, which could make it easier for competitorslimit the ability of our licensees and franchisees to capture increasedeffectively compete for market share.  If any of these events occurs,were to occur, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity could be materially harmed.

In addition, in the future, we may be requireddecide to assert infringement claims against third parties, and one or more parties may assert infringement claims against us.  Any resulting litigation could result in significant expense and divert the efforts of our management and other personnel, whether or not such litigation is determined in our favor.  Further, if any adverse ruling in any such matter occurs, any resulting limitations in our ability to market or license our brands could reduce the value of our licenses and our intellectual property assets and otherwiseour licenses, which could result in limitations on our ability to market and license our brands and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

14

21


Table of Contents

We may become involved in other litigation or government or administrative proceedings that may materially affect us.

From time to time, we may become involved in various legal proceedings relating to matters incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including commercial, employment, class action and other litigation and claims.  We may also be the subject of government and other regulatory investigations, audits and proceedings, including in connection with any claim of our violation of the laws, rules and regulations applicable to our business, such as federal, state and foreign franchise laws, anti-bribery laws and work safety and labor laws, among others.  SuchThese matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources and cause us to incurresult in significant legal and other expenses.  Furthermore, because litigation and administrative or government proceedings are inherently unpredictable, any of these proceedings could result in unfavorable outcomes, which could include monetary damages or fines and other sanctions.  Any such result could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We are dependent on our key management and other personnel.

Our success is highly dependent uponon the continued services of our key executives, consistingincluding of Henry Stupp, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors (“Board of Directors”), Howard Siegel, our President and Chief Operating Officer, and Jason Boling, our Chief Financial Officer, as well as certain of our other key employees, including Ed van Wezel, the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary that manages our Hi-Tec family of footwear brands, Martin Binnendijk, the President and Chief Operating Officer of our subsidiary that manages our Hi-Tec family of footwear brands, and Brian Curin, the President of our subsidiary that manages our Flip Flop Shops franchise operations.directors.  We have a limitedrelatively small number of employees, and the leadership and experience of Mr. Stupp’sStupp and our other executives’ leadershipexecutives and experience in the apparel licensing industry, Mr. Curin’s expertise in the franchising industry, and Messrs. van Wezel’s and Binnendijk’s experience with our newly acquired Hi-Tec family of footwear brandskey employees are important to the successful implementation of our business and marketing strategy.strategies.  We do not carry key person life insurance covering any of our executives or other employees.  The loss of the services of Mr. Stupp or our other executives or key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

We may encounter risks and difficulties in connection with acquisitions or other strategic transactions, and we may not realize the expected benefits fromof these transactions.

We regularly evaluate opportunities to acquire or represent new brands. During our three most recently completed fiscal years,brands, and we have completed threeseveral such acquisitions: our acquisition ofacquisitions during the Everyday California Lifestyle brand in May 2015; our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand in October 2015; and our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands in December 2016.past several years.  We expect to continue to consider opportunities to acquire or make investments in other brands or to engage in other strategic transactions that could enhance our portfolio of products and services or enable us to expand the breadth of ourto new markets.  Our experience integrating acquired assets and businesses is limited, and we may not be successful in realizing the expected benefits from an acquisition.of any acquisition we may pursue.  Our future success depends, in part, uponon our ability to manage an expandedexpanding portfolio of brands, which could involve significantly increased costs and pose substantial challenges for management.

Acquisitions and other strategic transactions can involve numerous risks and potential difficulties, including, among others: (i) problemschallenges assimilating new brands or other assets;assets into our business and our brand licensing model; (ii) problems maintaining and enforcing standards, procedures, controls, policies and information systems; (iii) difficulties and costs in combining the operations and personnel of anyan acquired businessesbusiness with our operations and personnel, including any failure to retain key employees, customers, vendors, manufacturers or other service providers or partners of anyan acquired businesses,business, any failure to convert and integrate acquired assets into our brandedbrand licensing business model, and challenges forecasting revenues and expenses for newly acquired brands;brands or businesses; (iv) significant or unanticipated costs associated with an acquisition, including incurrence of contingent liabilities, amortization charges associated with acquired assets, wirte-offswrite-offs of goodwill or trademarks,intangible assets, capital expenditures and accounting, legal and other transaction expenses; (v) any inability to realize the intended or expected synergies andor other benefits of an acquisition or transaction, particularly if our assumptions about sales, revenues, operating expenses and costs of acquired assets or businesses turn out to be wrong; (vi) diversion of management’s attention from our core business or our existing brand portfolio; (vii) adverse effects on existing business relationships with our partners;relationships; (viii) risks associated with foreign acquisitions or otherwise entering new geographic or

22


Table of Contents

customer markets, such as our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands in December 2016, including regional differences in consumer preferences, branding standards and the general conduct of business, less effective and less predictable protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights in some foreign jurisdictions and the other risks related to doing business outside the United States;States discussed elsewhere in these risk factors; and (ix) risks associated with new types of business arrangements in which we have no or limited prior experience, such as our acquisition of franchise agreements and entry into the franchising business upon our acquisition of the Flip Flop Shops brand in October 2015.experience.  Accordingly, our recent acquisitions as well asand any future strategic transactions that we pursue may not result in the anticipated benefits and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

In addition, future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available when needed, on favorable terms or at all.  If we seek to finance future acquisitions or other strategic transactions by issuing equity or convertible debt securities or by incurring other types of indebtedness, we may experience the risks associated with these transactions that are described elsewhere in these risk factors below. Further, we may seek such financing from sources that expose us to additional risks, such as our receivables funding loan agreement entered into with one of our directors, Mr. Jess Ravich, in December 2016 in connection with our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands, which creates a conflict of interest between us and Mr. Ravich that could have negative effects. Any of these effects could harm our operating results or financial condition.factors.

We have incurred a significant amount of indebtedness to pay the cash consideration for our recent acquisitions. Our level of indebtedness, and restrictions under such indebtedness, could adversely affect our operations and liquidity.15

We entered into a credit facility with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC (“Cerberus”) in December 2016. As of the date of this report, approximately $45.0 million in principal amount is outstanding under our term loan facility with Cerberus. As of the date of this report, we also have $5.0 million outstanding on our revolving credit facility with Cerberus. Our outstanding indebtedness under the Cerberus credit facility is due in December 2021.

The Cerberus credit facility imposes various restrictions and covenants regarding the operation of our business, including covenants that require us to obtain Cerberus’s consent before we can, among other things and subject to certain limited exceptions: (i) incur additional indebtedness or additional liens on our property, (ii) consummate acquisitions, dispositions, mergers or consolidations, (iii) make any change in the nature of our business, (iv) enter into transactions with our affiliates, or (v) repurchase or redeem any outstanding shares of our common stock or pay dividends or other distributions, other than stock dividends, to our stockholders. The Cerberus credit facility also imposes financial covenants that set financial standards we will be required to maintain. Further, as collateral for the Cerberus credit facility, we have granted a first priority security interest in favor of Cerberus in substantially all of our assets (including trademarks), and our indebtedness is guaranteed by our subsidiaries. If an event of default occurs under the credit facility, that is not forborne, or cured or waived in accordance with the terms of the credit facility, Cerberus has the right to terminate its obligations under the credit facility, accelerate the payment on any unpaid balance of the credit facility and exercise any other rights it may have, including foreclosing on our assets that serve as collateral for the loan. We obtained a waiver to this credit facility on April 28, 2017, due the late filing of the Company’s Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K. Our failure to comply with the terms of our indebtedness could have a material adverse effect to our business, financial condition and liquidity.

We may seek to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness in the future. Any such refinancing would depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at the time, which could affect our ability to obtain attractive refinance terms when desired, or at all.

In addition, our level of indebtedness generally could adversely affect our operations and liquidity, by, among other things: (i) making it more difficult for us to pay or refinance our debts as they become due during adverse economic and industry conditions because we may not have sufficient cash flows to make our scheduled debt payments; (ii) causing us to use a larger portion of our cash flows to fund interest and principal payments, thereby reducing the availability of cash to fund working capital, product development and capital expenditures and other business activities; (iii) making it more difficult for us to take advantage of significant business opportunities, such as acquisition opportunities or other strategic transactions, and to react to changes in market or industry conditions; and (iv) limiting

23


Table of Contents

our ability to borrow additional monies in the future to fund working capital, product development, capital expenditures, brand acquisitions and other general corporate purposes as and when needed, which could force us to suspend, delay or curtail business prospects, strategies or operations.

Our future capital needs may be uncertain and we may need to raise additional funds in the future, and such funds may not be available when needed,  on acceptable terms or at all.

Our capital requirements in future periods may be uncertain and could depend upon many factors, including, among others: acceptance of, and demand for, our brands; the costs of developing new brands; the extent to which we invest in new brands; the number and timing of our acquisitions and other strategic transactions; the costs associated with our expansion, if any; and the costs of litigation and enforcement activities to defend our trademarks. In the future, we may need to raise additional funds, and such funds may not be available when needed, on favorable terms, or at all. If we issue equity or convertible debt securities to raise additional funds, as we did with our public offering of our common stock in December 2016, our existing stockholders would experience dilution and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders, and if we incur additional debt to raise funds, as we did with our new credit facility with Cerberus entered into in December 2016, we may become over-leveraged and our ability to operate our business may be restricted by the agreements governing the debt. Further, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital transactions, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs.

Moreover, our late filing of this Annual Report renders us ineligible to register the offer and sale of our securities using a registration statement on Form S-3, and we will not regain such eligibility until we have timely filed our periodic reports with the SEC for 12 consecutive calendar months. We do not know when we will meet this requirement, which depends upon our ability to file our periodic reports on a timely basis in the future. If we seek to raise capital through an offering of our securities while we remain ineligible to use Form S-3, our inability to use this form could limit our financing alternatives, reduce our ability to access capital in a timely manner and increase our transaction costs, any of which could make it more difficult to execute any such transaction successfully and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

If we cannot raise funds when needed, on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products and services, execute our business plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated customer requirements. This may materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our strategic and marketing initiatives may not be successful.

In recent periods, weWe have invested significant funds and management time in furtherance of our global strategic and marketing initiatives, which are designed to strengthen our brands, assist our licensees in generating increased sales of products bearing our brands and build value for our stockholders over the long term.  We expect to continue and, in some cases, expand suchthese initiatives in future periods.  While we are hopeful that our efforts in executing on these initiatives will expandgrow our business and build stockholder value, over the long-term, we may not be successful in doing so and suchthese initiatives may not result in the intended or expected benefits.  Any failure by us to execute on our strategic initiatives, or the failure of suchthese initiatives to cause our revenues to grow, could have a materially adverse impact on our operating results and financial performance.

We must successfully maintain and/or upgrade our information technology systems.

We rely on variousSignificant disruptions of information technology systems, includingbreaches of data security, or unauthorized disclosures of sensitive data or personally identifiable information could adversely affect our Enterprise Resource Planning system, to manage our operations, which subjectsbusiness and could subject us to inherent costsliability or reputational damage.

Our business is increasingly dependent on critical, complex, and risks associated with maintaining, upgrading, replacinginterdependent information technology (“IT”) systems, including Internet-based systems, some of which are managed or hosted by third parties, to support business processes as well as internal and changing theseexternal communications. The size and complexity of our IT systems includingmake us potentially vulnerable to IT system breakdowns, malicious intrusion, and computer viruses, which may result in the impairment of our information technology, potential disruptionability to operate our business effectively.

In addition, our systems and the systems of our internal control systems, substantial capital expenditures, demands on management timethird-party providers and delayscollaborators are potentially vulnerable to data security breaches which may expose sensitive data to unauthorized persons or difficulties in upgrading existing systems, transitioning to new systemsthe public. Such data security breaches could lead to the loss of confidential information, trade secrets or integrating new systems into our current systems. If anyother intellectual property, or could lead to the public exposure of these risks were to materialize, our operations could be disrupted and our performance could be harmed.

24


Table of Contents

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of cybersecurity and other system failures.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and thosepersonal information (including personally identifiable information) of our licenseesemployees, customers, business partners, and franchisees are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, warothers. In addition, the increased use of social media by our employees and telecommunication and electrical failures. Although we have not experienced any such cybersecurity or system failure, accident or breach to date, some of our licensees, including Target, have experienced such events in the past. If such an event were to occur to our internal systems, itcontractors could result in a materialinadvertent disclosure of sensitive data or personal information, including but not limited to, confidential information, trade secrets and other intellectual property.

Any such disruption or security breach, as well as any action by us or our employees or contractors that might be inconsistent with the rapidly evolving data privacy and security laws and regulations applicable within the United States and elsewhere where we conduct business, could result in enforcement actions by U.S. states, the U.S. Federal government or foreign governments, liability or sanctions under data privacy laws that protect personally identifiable information, regulatory penalties, other legal proceedings such as but not limited to private litigation, the incurrence of significant remediation costs, disruptions to our development programs, business operations substantial costs to rectify or correct the failure, if possible, lossand collaborations, diversion of ormanagement efforts and damage to our data or applications, inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information or the incurrence of other material liabilities. If such events were to occur to our licensees’ or franchisees’ systems, our royalty revenuesreputation, which could be reduced or disrupted due to decreased sales of our branded products as a result of reputational damage, diversion of costs and other resources from selling products bearing our brands or inability of our licensees or franchisees to calculate royalties or generate royalty reports. Any of these events could severely harm our business resultsand operations. Because of operationsthe rapidly moving nature of technology and prospects.the increasing sophistication of cybersecurity threats, our measures to prevent, respond to and minimize such risks may be unsuccessful.

In addition, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union adopted a comprehensive general data privacy regulation (“GDPR”) in 2016 to replace the current European Union Data Protection Directive and related country-specific legislation. The GDPR took effect in May 2018 and governs the collection and use of personal data in the European Union. The GDPR, which is wide-ranging in scope, will impose several requirements relating to the consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates, the information provided to the individuals, the security and confidentiality of the personal data, data breach notification and the use of third-party processors in connection with the processing of the personal data. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the European Union to the United States, enhances enforcement authority and imposes large penalties for noncompliance, including the potential for fines of up to €20 million or 4% of the annual global revenues of the infringer, whichever is greater.

Changes in our effective tax rates or tax provisions or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income tax returns could adversely affect our net income.financial results.

We are subject to income tax in the United States, California and certain other state jurisdictions.  In addition, following our acquisition of the Hi-Tec family of footwear brands, we are also subject to taxation in several foreign jurisdictions, which may have unusual, unfamiliar or particularly burdensome tax laws.  Our new global tax structure could be negatively impacted by various factors, including changes in the tax rates in jurisdictions in which we earn income or changes in tax laws or interpretations of tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate, allany of which could impact our future effective income tax rates.  Our effective tax rates could also be adversely affected in the future by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.  Any increase in our effective tax rate could adversely affect our future reported financial results or the way in which we conduct our business.

16


Table of Contents

Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. Intaxes, as there are many transactions and calculations in the ordinary course of our business therethat involve uncertain tax determinations.  If we are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Further, we may be audited by tax authorities, whichthese authorities could evaluate and disagree with our judgments regardingabout our tax provisions.  Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigationauthorities in the event of such an audit could be expensive to defend and materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals.  The results ofAny adverse result in such an audit or related litigation could materially negatively affect our income tax provision net income or cash flowsand results of operations in the period or periods for which thatthe determination is made.  Moreover, any such audits or litigation, regardless of its outcome, could distract management and be expensive to defend, which could negatively affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Compliance with securities laws, regulations and financial reporting standards could increase our costs and pose challenges for our management team, and any compliance failures could materially harm our business.

Existing laws, regulations, listing requirements and other standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure significantly increase the costs and risks associated with operating as a publicly traded company in the United States.  Our management team devotes significant time and financial resources to try to comply with existing and evolving standards for public companies.  Notwithstanding our efforts, it is possible that financial and other public reports we are obligated to file may not be considered timely, accurate or complete, in which case we may be forced to devote additional time and capital resources to further improve our public reporting systems and processes.  In addition, any noncompliance with public reporting requirements could subject us to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC, which could involve fines or other penalties, and could also adversely affect our financial results, result in a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial information and other public disclosures and jeopardize the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, as described elsewhere in these risk factors.  If any of these risks were to occur, our business and reputation could be materially adversely affected, and the market price of our common stock could materially decline.

Further, the SEC has passed, promulgated or proposed new rules on a variety of subjects, including, for example, preparing and filing financial statements, establishing and disclosing clawback and hedging policies and disclosing additional executive compensation information.  The existence of new and proposed laws and regulations relating to financial reporting or other disclosure obligations or that impose additional or more stringent compliance requirements could create uncertainties for public companies, make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified executive officers and members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit and compensation committees, and generate significantly increased costs if we are required to add additional accounting or other staff, engage consultants or change our internal practices in order to comply with the new requirements.  The occurrence of any of these outcomes could significantly harm our business, financial condition and performance.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

The trading price of our common stock may be volatile, and shares of our common stock are relatively illiquid.

The trading price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, subject to material fluctuations.  These fluctuations as a result ofcan be caused by various factors, impacting our business, including, among others: (i) the ongoing impacts of COVID-19; (ii) our financial results; (ii)results and financial condition, including our liquidity; (iii) our ability to maintain compliance with our obligations, including our credit facility; (iv) the successful completion of any acquisition or strategic transaction, including the integration of the acquired assets or businesses into our existing business and realization of the intended or expected synergies and other benefits of the acquisition or transaction; (iii)benefits; (v) any announcements by us, our retail partners or our competitors as applicable, regarding or affecting the retail environment, either domestically or internationally, the reputation of our brands, our existing or any new license agreements and brand representations, or acquisitions, strategic alliances or other transactions; (iv)(vi) recruitment or departure of key personnel; (v)(vii) changes in the estimates ofour financial guidance, if any, expectations for our financial results in the investment community, or changes in the recommendations of any securities analysts that elect to follow our common stock; (vi)(viii) any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting including the material weaknesses we identified as of January 28, 2017 that are described elsewhere in these risk factors, or any failures to comply with applicableour public reporting requirements, as has occurred with this Annual Report and as is described elsewhere in these risk factors; (vii)requirements; (ix) market conditions in the retail industry and the economy as a whole; and (viii)(x) the other risks described in these risk factors.

Further, as a result of our relatively small public float, our common stock may be less liquid, and the trading price for our common stock may be more affected by relatively small volumes of trading, than is the case for the common stock of companies with broader public ownership. Among other things, trading of a relatively small volume of our

17

25


Table of Contents

common shares may have a greater impact on the trading price for our common stock than would be the case if our public float was larger.

We are not currently in compliance with NASDAQ’scertain Nasdaq listing requirements. If we are not able to regain compliance with these requirements, for continued listing, and if NASDAQ does not concur that we have adequately remedied our non-compliance with applicable listing rules, our common stock may be delisted from trading on the NASDAQ Global SelectNasdaq Stock Market, which could have a material adverse effect on us and our stockholders.

On May 3, 2017,June 5, 2018, we received a deficiency letter from The NASDAQthe Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”Nasdaq”) indicatingnotifying us that, as a resultbecause the bid price of not filing this Annual Report in a timely manner,our common stock closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days, we were notno longer in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5250(c)(1)Nasdaq’s minimum bid price rule, which is a requirement for continued listing on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market. The deficiency letter indicatedNasdaq’s rules require that we would need to regain compliance with this rule by December 3, 2018.  On December 4, 2018, however, we received a letter from Nasdaq notifying us that our transfer to the Nasdaq Capital Market was approved and that we had been granted an additional 180-day extension period to regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule.  This 180-day period expired on June 3, 2019.  We received another letter from Nasdaq on June 4, 2019 indicating their intent to delist our securities from the Nasdaq Capital Market on June 13, 2019 because we had not achieved the required minimum bid price unless we requested an appeal of this determination.  We filed our appeal on June 6, 2019 and met with the Nasdaq Hearings Panel in August 2019. The Nasdaq Hearings Panel accepted our compliance plan, which resulted in the September 2019 one-for-three reverse stock split described in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report.  On October 30, 2019, The Nasdaq Hearings Panel granted our continued listing on Nasdaq subject to further review after December 2, 2019.  On December 11, 2019, we received a letter from Nasdaq informing us that the Nasdaq Hearings Panel determined that we had regained compliance with the minimum bid price rule.  As a result, the Nasdaq Hearings Panel determined that we were in compliance with all applicable listing standards required for listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market.  However, based on our recent bid price history, the Nasdaq Hearings Panel imposed a Hearings Panel monitor pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5815(d)(4)(A), through December 2, 2020.  On April 3, 2020, we received notice from the Nasdaq indicating that, based upon the Company’s non-compliance with the minimum closing bid price requirement of $1.00 per share, as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Rule”), for the prior 30-consecutive business day period, the Company’s securities were subject to suspension and delisting unless the Company timely requests a hearing before the Nasdaq Hearings Panel. We were not provided the 180-day compliance period typically granted to issuers under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A) because we were already under the jurisdiction of the Nasdaq Hearings Panel.  We filed our appeal on April 10, 2020, which stays any further action by Nasdaq at least pending the ultimate conclusion of the hearing process. On April 16, 2020, Nasdaq announced it was providing temporary relief from the Rule as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and related extraordinary market conditions.  Compliance requirements will resume on July 1, 2020.  If we have until July 3, 2017not regained compliance with the Rule by the date that compliance requirements resume, the hearings process will resume.  At the hearing, if it becomes necessary, we would expect to submit apresent our plan to regain compliance with NASDAQ’s continued listing standards;the Rule and request an extension within which to do so. The Nasdaq Hearings Panel has the discretion to grant us an extension through no later than September 30, 2020 plus the incremental days of the temporary relief period; however, there can be no assurance that the Nasdaq Hearings Panel will grant our request or that we believe our filing of this Annual Report has resulted in our regainedwill be able to evidence compliance with NASDAQ’s continuedthe applicable listing standards and has eliminatedcriteria within the needperiod of time that may be provided by the Nasdaq Hearing Panel.

If we fail to submit such a compliance plan. Although we believe that, as of our filing of this Annual Report, we are currently in compliance with NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements, we could failcontinue to comply with these requirements againthe minimum bid price rule or with any other Nasdaq requirement in the future. In that case, we would receive additional deficiency letters from NASDAQ andfuture, our common stock could be delisted from trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, whichNasdaq.  Such an event could cause our common stock to be classified as a “penny stock,” among other potentially detrimental consequences, and could severely limit the liquidity of our common stock and materially adversely affect the price of our common stock.

We may fail to meet publicly announced financial guidance or other expectations about our business, which would cause our common stock to decline in value.

From time to time, we may provide forward-looking financial guidance regarding our performance.  Any such guidance would be based on our then-current views, expectations and assumptions and could be materially different than our actual results.  Additionally, securities analysts or others in the investment community may publish expectations for our financial results, which also could be materially different than our actual results.  These differences could occur for a variety of reasons, such as, for instance, changes to the assumptions used to forecast or calculate the financial guidance or expectations, or the occurrence of risks related to our performance and our business, including those discussed in these risk factors, among others.  Any failure to meet any financial guidance or expectations regarding our future performance could harm our reputation and cause our stock price to decline.

We may not pay dividends regularly or at all in the future.

The determinationDeterminations regarding the payment of dividends isare subject to the discretion of our Boardboard of Directors, and thereforedirectors.  As a result, we may not pay any dividends in future periods, whether or not we generate sufficient cash to do so.  In addition, pursuant to our credit facility, with Cerberus, subject to limited exceptions, we are prohibited from paying dividends or making other distributions to our stockholders without Cerberus’sour lender’s consent.  As a result, any return on an investment in our common stock may be limited to an appreciation in the value of our common stock.

18


Table of Contents

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

The sale by our stockholders of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur upon the expiration of any statutory holding period, such as under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, or upon expiration of any lock-up periods applicable to outstanding shares, including under the lock-up agreements entered into in connection with our public offering of our common stock in December 2016, or upon our issuance of new shares uponas a result of the exercise of outstanding options or warrants or the vesting of restricted stock units, could cause the market price of our common stock to fall.  The availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make it more difficult for us to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future when needed, on acceptable terms or at all.

Our Certificatecertificate of Incorporationincorporation allows our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock.

Our Certificatecertificate of Incorporationincorporation allows our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock without any action by our stockholders.  Subject to the restrictions under our new credit facility, with Cerberus, such shares of preferred stock may be issued on terms determined by our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors in its discretion, and may have rights, privilegespreferences and preferencesprivileges superior to those of our common stock.  For instance, such shares of preferred stock could have liquidation rightspreferences that are senior to the liquidation preferencerights applicable to our common stock, could have superior voting or conversion rights, which could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our common stock, or could have other terms that negatively impact the voting control or other rights of our common stockholders.  Additionally, the ownership interest of holders of our common stock would be diluted following the issuance of any shares of our preferred stock. Further, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method for discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company.Company, even at a time or under circumstances when you or other stockholders may prefer such a change in control.

A small number of our stockholders beneficially own a significant portion of our common stock and therefore are able to exert significant influence over our corporate decisions, including the election of directors and a change of control.  The interests of these stockholders may differ from yours.

A small number of stockholders beneficially own a significant portion of our common stock.  As a result, these parties may be able to influence or control matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and mergers, acquisitions or other extraordinary transactions.  These parties may have interests that differ from ours or yours, and they may vote in ways with which you disagree and that may be adverse to your interests.  This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of our Company, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock as part of a sale of our Company.  Conversely, this concentration of ownership may facilitate a change of control at a time or under circumstances when you and other stockholders may prefer not to sell.  Further, this concentration of ownership could adversely affect the prevailing market price for our common stock.

2619


Table of Contents

We may fail to meet publicly announced financial guidance or other expectations about our business, which would cause our common stock to decline in value.

From time to time, we provide forward-looking financial guidance to our investors. Such statements are based on our current views, expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, performance, achievements or share prices to be materially different from any future results, performance, achievements or share prices expressed or implied by such statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others: changes to the assumptions used to forecast or calculate such guidance; risks related to acquisitions or strategic transactions we may pursue in the future, including the risk that we do not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction; and risks related to our performance and our branded licensing business model.

Item 1B.    UNRESOLVEDUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

Item 2.    PROPERTIES

We lease an 11,399 square foot office facility in Sherman Oaks, California, which serves as our corporate headquarters.  In February 2016, we exercised our right to renew thisThe lease for an additional five-year term, which began on November 1, 2016 andthis facility will endexpire on October 31, 2021,2024, subject to our option to renew the lease for an additional five years thereafter. Our monthly base rent under this lease is currently $30,663. We also lease a 3,850 square foot office facility in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The current term of this lease ends on June 30, 2018, subject to our option to renew for an additional three-year term, and our monthly base rent under this lease is currently $4,013. Beginning in March 2016, we are no longer occupying our Minnesota office facilities and we entered into an agreement to sublease a portion of such facilities to a third party, pursuant to which we receive $1,886 in monthly rent. We also lease a 2,032 square foot office facility in Huntington Beach, California. The lease for our Huntington Beach office facilities was early terminated and is set to expire in August 2017.  Our monthly base rent under this lease is currently $2,736. These lease agreements include provisions allowing for early termination under certain conditions.

Our Hi-Tec subsidiary, acquired in December 2016, leases a 24,251 square foot office facility in Amsterdam, Netherlands, which serves as Hi-Tec’s corporate headquarters. Our monthly base rent under this lease is currently $36,621 and the lease expires on December 31, 2026. This subsidiary also has a lease in Modesto, California for a 111,992 square foot warehouse, which was used by our licensee, Carolina Footwear, during the transition period. Upon their departure we expect to sublease this location. The current term of this lease ends on September 30, 2024 and the monthly base rent under this lease is currently $43,688.  We also have one office in Tigard, Oregon for 8,123 square feet with a monthly base rent of $13,218 which expires on July 31, 2020.  The Tigard office was used by our licensee, Carolina Footwear, during the transition period.  Upon their departure we expect to sublease this location.

Item 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business.  The impact and outcome of litigation, if any, is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that could harm our business.  We are not currently aware of any such legal proceedings or claims to which we are a party or to which our property is subject that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

20

27


Table of Contents

PART IIPART II

Item 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND  ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information, Dividends and Holders

Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global SelectNasdaq Capital Market under the trading symbol “CHKE”“APEX”.  The table below sets forth, for each of the fiscal quarters during our two most recently completed fiscal years, the range of the high and low sales prices for our common stock and the cashThere were no dividends declared andor paid per share, if any.during Fiscal 2020 or Fiscal 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends

 

Dividends

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Declared

 

Paid

 

Fiscal 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended May 2, 2015

 

$

24.50

 

$

17.95

 

$

 —

 

$

 

Quarter ended August 1, 2015

 

 

29.72

 

 

21.37

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Quarter ended October 31, 2015

 

 

28.92

 

 

13.64

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended January 30, 2016

 

 

19.7

 

 

12.92

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended April 30, 2016

 

$

18.48

 

$

15.64

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Quarter ended July 30, 2016

 

 

14.94

 

 

10.34

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Quarter ended October 29, 2016

 

 

11.50

 

 

9.59

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended January 28, 2017

 

 

11.45

 

 

9.00

 

 

 

 

 

As of April 20, 2017,13, 2020, the approximate number of stockholdersholders of record of our common stock was 65.38.  This figure does not include an indeterminable number of beneficial holders whose shares may be held of record by brokerage firms and clearing agencies.

In the future, fromFrom time to time, our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors may, in its discretion, declare cash dividends depending upon Cherokee Global Brands’on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, capital requirements, compliance with our senior secured credit facility with Cerberus and other factors deemed relevant by our Boardboard of Directors.directors. See the discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” and Note 107 to ourthe consolidated financial statements included in this Annual ReportItem 8, “Financial Statements” for more information about the restrictions on dividends contained in our credit facility with Cerberus.facility.

Common Stock Performance

The following performance graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, unless it is specifically incorporated by reference into any such filing. The graph is required by applicable SEC rules and is not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock.

Due to the nature of our business, we do not believe that a comparable peer group of publicly‑traded licensing companies exists. As a result, we have compared the return on investment in our common stock to the NASDAQ Composite Index and the S&P 100 Stock Index.

28


Table of Contents

The table and the graph below compare the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the S&P 100 Stock Index for the period commencing January 28, 2012 and ending on January 28, 2017. The data set forth below assumes a $100 investment in our common stock and each index on January 28, 2012 and the reinvestment of all dividends.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

FY 2012

    

FY 2013

    

FY 2014

    

FY 2015

    

FY 2016

    

FY 2017

 

 

 

1/28/2012

 

2/2/2013

 

2/1/2014

 

1/31/2015

 

1/30/2016

 

1/28/2017

 

Cherokee Inc.

 

100.00

 

143.58

 

145.16

 

194.04

 

174.83

 

100.33

 

NASDAQ Composite Index

 

100.00

 

114.36

 

149.58

 

170.96

 

172.16

 

213.88

 

S&P 100 Stock Index

 

100.00

 

117.33

 

139.05

 

157.68

 

159.94

 

191.00

 

29


Table of Contents

Item 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial information has been taken or derived from our auditedconsolidated financial statements.  Our consolidated financial statements for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019 and for each of the two years ended February 1, 2020 are included in this Annual Report. ThisReport and have been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm.  You should read this information may be subject to factors that affect the comparability of the information and these historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in the current period or in future periods. This information should be read together with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8, “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report.Statements”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Year

 

Year

 

Year

 

Year

 

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

 

January 28,

 

January 30,

 

January 31,

 

February 1,

 

February 2,

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

($ In Thousands Except Per Share Data)

Income Statement Data:

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

Royalty revenues

 

$

34,022

 

$

34,654

 

$

34,968

 

$

28,614

 

$

26,558

Indirect product sales

 

 

6,599

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total revenues

 

 

40,621

 

 

34,654

 

 

34,968

 

 

28,614

 

 

26,558

Cost of goods sold

 

 

5,083

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Gross profit

 

 

35,538

 

 

34,654

 

 

34,968

 

 

28,614

 

 

26,558

Selling, general and administrative expenses (a)

 

 

34,243

 

 

20,456

 

 

18,648

 

 

17,630

 

 

13,973

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

912

 

 

882

 

 

932

 

 

995

 

 

1,491

Restructure charges

 

 

3,782

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(3,399)

 

 

13,316

 

 

15,388

 

 

9,989

 

 

11,094

Interest expense

 

 

(1,661)

 

 

(711)

 

 

(854)

 

 

(520)

 

 

(240)

Interest income

 

 

391

 

 

186

 

 

 

 

 2

 

 

18

(Loss) Income before income taxes

 

 

(4,669)

 

 

12,791

 

 

14,534

 

 

9,471

 

 

10,872

Income tax expense

 

 

3,258

 

 

4,358

 

 

4,714

 

 

3,397

 

 

4,039

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,927)

 

$

8,433

 

$

9,820

 

$

6,074

 

$

6,833

Basic earnings per share

 

$

(0.84)

 

$

0.97

 

$

1.17

 

$

0.72

 

$

0.81

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

(0.84)

 

$

0.95

 

$

1.15

 

$

0.72

 

$

0.81

Cash dividends declared per share

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

0.10

 

$

0.3

 

$

0.60

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

February 1,

2020 (1)

 

 

February 2,

2019 (1)

 

 

February 3,

2018 (1)

 

 

January 28,

2017 (1)

 

 

January 30,

2016

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

 

21,041

 

 

$

 

24,444

 

 

$

 

29,365

 

 

$

 

34,022

 

 

$

 

34,654

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

 

13,255

 

 

 

 

14,638

 

 

 

 

25,446

 

 

 

 

19,106

 

 

 

 

16,553

 

Stock-based compensation and stock warrant charges

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

 

890

 

 

 

 

3,789

 

 

 

 

2,380

 

 

 

 

2,222

 

Business acquisition and integration costs

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

 

7,537

 

 

 

 

11,498

 

 

 

 

1,234

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

1,134

 

 

 

 

5,755

 

 

 

 

2,080

 

 

 

 

3,782

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible asset and goodwill impairment charge

 

 

 

9,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(479

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

1,167

 

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

 

1,408

 

 

 

 

1,483

 

 

 

 

1,329

 

Operating (loss) income

 

 

 

(4,931

)

 

 

 

1,855

 

 

 

 

(46,395

)

 

 

 

(4,227

)

 

 

 

13,316

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

 

 

(13,832

)

 

 

 

(9,638

)

 

 

 

(52,831

)

 

 

 

(5,464

)

 

 

 

12,791

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

(11,500

)

 

 

 

(11,539

)

 

 

 

(55,861

)

 

 

 

(8,722

)

 

 

 

8,433

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share

 

 

 

(2.12

)

 

 

 

(2.45

)

 

 

 

(12.48

)

 

 

 

(2.79

)

 

 

 

2.91

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

 

 

(2.12

)

 

 

 

(2.45

)

 

 

 

(12.48

)

 

 

 

(2.79

)

 

 

 

2.85

 

Cash dividends declared per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

January 28,

    

January 30,

    

January 31,

    

February 1,

    

February 2,

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

 

February 3,

2018

 

 

January 28,

2017

 

 

January 30

2016

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

 

$

970

 

$

3,010

 

$

5,881

 

$

694

 

$

3,425

 

 

$

 

(58,118

)

 

$

 

(917

)

 

$

 

(48,200

)

 

$

 

(6,979

)

 

$

 

3,010

 

Total assets

 

 

166,016

 

 

70,548

 

 

58,660

 

 

54,111

 

 

33,652

 

 

 

82,922

 

 

 

93,111

 

 

 

101,729

 

 

 

153,081

 

 

 

70,548

 

Long term debt

 

 

41,595

 

 

15,068

 

 

17,836

 

 

25,144

 

 

13,228

 

Long-term debt, including current portion

 

 

56,044

 

 

 

54,454

 

 

 

46,105

 

 

 

46,732

 

 

 

23,524

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

72,318

 

 

42,071

 

 

29,837

 

 

17,899

 

 

13,526

 

 

 

5,347

 

 

 

15,122

 

 

 

24,115

 

 

 

72,318

 

 

 

42,071

 

21


(a)

Selling, general and administrative expenses include acquisition costs (such as legal and due diligence costs relating to acquisitions) of $11.5 million, $1.2 million, $0.0 million, $1.0 million and $0.0 million  for the years ended January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, February 1,2014 and February 2, 2013, respectively.

30


Table of Contents

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

February 1,

2020 (1)

 

 

February 2,

2019 (1)

 

 

February 3,

2018 (1)

 

 

January 28,

2017 (1)

 

 

January 30

2016

 

Non-GAAP and Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA (2)

 

$

 

7,786

 

 

$

 

9,806

 

 

$

 

3,919

 

 

$

 

14,916

 

 

$

 

18,101

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses ratio (3)

 

 

 

63.0

%

 

 

 

59.9

%

 

 

 

86.7

%

 

 

 

56.2

%

 

 

 

47.8

%

Return on average stockholders’ equity (4)

 

 

 

(112.4

)%

 

 

 

(64.1

)%

 

 

 

(115.9

)%

 

 

 

(15.2

)%

 

 

 

23.5

%

(1)

Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 include the operations of Hi-Tec since its acquisition on December 7, 2016. 

(2)

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income before (i) interest expense, (ii) other expense, (iii) provision for income taxes, (iv) depreciation and amortization, (v) gain on sale of assets, (vi) intangible asset impairment charge, (vii) restructuring charges, (viii) business acquisition and integration costs and (ix) stock-based compensation and stock warrant charges.  Adjusted EBITDA is not defined under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and it may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.  We use Adjusted EBITDA, along with other GAAP measures, as a measure of profitability, because Adjusted EBITDA helps us compare our performance on a consistent basis by removing from our operating results the impact of our capital structure, the effect of operating in different tax jurisdictions, the impact of our asset base, which can differ depending on the book value of assets and the accounting methods used to compute depreciation and amortization, and the cost of acquiring or disposing of businesses and restructuring our operations.  We believe it is useful to investors for the same reasons.  Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as a profitability measure in that it does not include the interest expense on our long-term debt, our provision for income taxes, the effect of our expenditures for capital assets and certain intangible assets, or the costs of acquiring or disposing of businesses and restructuring our operations, or our non-cash charges for stock-based compensation and stock warrants.  A reconciliation from net (loss) from operations as reported in our consolidated statement of operations to Adjusted EBITDA is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

 

February 3,

2018

 

 

January 28,

2017

 

 

January 30

2016

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

 

(11,500

)

 

$

 

(11,539

)

 

$

 

(55,861

)

 

$

 

(8,722

)

 

$

 

8,433

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

 

(2,332

)

 

 

 

1,901

 

 

 

 

3,030

 

 

 

 

3,258

 

 

 

 

4,358

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

8,809

 

 

 

 

8,220

 

 

 

 

6,500

 

 

 

 

1,661

 

 

 

 

711

 

Other expense (income)

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

 

3,273

 

 

 

 

(64

)

 

 

 

(424

)

 

 

 

(186

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

1,167

 

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

 

1,408

 

 

 

 

1,483

 

 

 

 

1,329

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(479

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible asset and goodwill impairment loss

 

 

 

9,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

1,134

 

 

 

 

5,755

 

 

 

 

2,080

 

 

 

 

3,782

 

 

 

 

 

Business acquisition and integration costs

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

 

7,537

 

 

 

 

11,498

 

 

 

 

1,234

 

Stock-based compensation and stock warrant charges

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

 

890

 

 

 

 

3,789

 

 

 

 

2,380

 

 

 

 

2,222

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

 

7,786

 

 

$

 

9,806

 

 

$

 

3,919

 

 

$

 

14,916

 

 

$

 

18,101

 

(3)

Computed based on selling, general and administrative expenses divided by revenues.

(4)

Computed based on net (loss) income from continuing operations divided by the average of beginning and ending stockholders’ equity.

22


Table of Contents

Item 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS

The followingAs used in this discussion and analysis, “Apex Global Brands”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Apex Global Brands Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates or requires otherwise.  Additionally, “Fiscal 2020” refers to our fiscal year ending February 1, 2020; “Fiscal 2019” refers to our fiscal year ending February 2, 2019  We have a 52‑ or 53‑week fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest to January 31.  This results in a 53‑week fiscal year approximately every four or five years.  Fiscal 2018 was a 53-week fiscal year, while each of Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019 were 52‑week fiscal years.  This discussion and analysis should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this annual report on Form 10‑K (the “Annual Report”). K.

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, the followingthis discussion and analysis contains forward‑“forward‑looking statements.statements” within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical facts that relate to future events or circumstances or our future performance.  The words “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “plans”, “expects”, “objectives”, “goals”, “aims”, “hopes”, “may”, “might”, “will”, “likely”, “should” and similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward‑looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking.  Forward‑looking statements in this discussion and analysis include statements about, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, our future liquidity and capital resources, our business and growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business and our industry.  Forward-looking statements are based on our current views, expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance, achievements or sharestock prices to be materially different from any future results, performance, achievements or sharestock prices expressed or implied by the forward‑looking statements.  Such risks, uncertainties and uncertaintiesother factors include, among others, the risksthose described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.  YouIn addition, we operate in a competitive and rapidly evolving industry in which new risks emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of the risks we may face, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors could cause actual results to differ from our expectations.  As a result of these and other potential risks and uncertainties, forward-looking statements should not place undue reliancebe relied on the forward‑looking statements we makeor viewed as predictions of future events because some or all of them may turn out to be wrong.

As used  Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any of the forward‑looking statements we make in this discussion and analysis “Cherokee Global Brands”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Cherokee Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicatesreflect future events or requires otherwise. Additionally, as used herein, “Fiscal 2018” refers to the fiscal year ending February 3, 2018; “Fiscal 2017” refers to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017; “Fiscal 2016” refers to the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016; and “Fiscal 2015” refers to the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.

We have a 52‑developments or 53‑week fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest to January 31, which aligns withchanges in our retail licensees who generally also operate and plan using such a fiscal year. This results in a 53‑week fiscal year approximately every fourexpectations or five years. Each of Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 was a 52‑week fiscal year, and Fiscal 2018 will be a 53-week fiscal year. Certain of our international licensees report royalties to us for quarterly and annual periods that may differ from ours.  We do not believe that the varying quarterly or annual period ending dates from our international licensees have a material impact upon our reported financial results, as these international licensees maintain comparable annual periods in which they report retail sales and royalties to us on a year‑to‑year basis.any other reason.

Overview

CherokeeApex Global Brands is a global marketer and manager of a portfolio of fashion and lifestyle brands it owns or represents, licensingthat we own, brands that we create, and brands that we develop for others.  Company-owned brands, which are licensed in multiple consumer product categories and retail channels around the world, include Cherokee, Hi-Tec, Magnum, 50 Peaks, Interceptor, Hawk Signature, Tony Hawk, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Flip Flop Shops, Everyday California, Carole Little, Sideout and Sideout brands and related trademarks and other brands in multiple consumer product categories and sectors.others.  As part of our business strategy, we also regularly evaluate other brands and trademarks for acquisition into our portfolio.  We believe the strength of our brand portfolio and platform of design, product development and marketing capabilities has made us one of the leading global licensors of style-focused lifestyle brands for apparel, footwear, accessories and home products and accessories.products.

We have entered into license agreementslicensing relationships with recognizable retail partners in their respective global locations to provide them with the rights to design, manufacture and sell products bearing our brands and to provide them access to our proprietary 360-degree platform.brands.  We refer to this strategy as our “Direct to Retail” or “DTR” licensing model.  We also have also entered into wholesale arrangementslicense agreements with manufacturers and distributors for the manufacture and sale of products bearing certain of our brands, including nine new wholesale arrangements with distributors that startedwhich we refer to sell products bearing our Cherokee brand at retail in the United States at the beginning of Fiscal 2018 and wholesale arrangements for our newly acquired Hi-Tec and Magnum brands and we conduct indirect product sales to select wholesalers and government entities for our Hi-Tec and Magnum brands.as “wholesale” licensing.  In addition, we have franchise relationships with other retailers that sell products we have developed and designed.  As a brand marketer and manager, we do not directly sell product ourselves.  Rather, we earn royalties when our licensees sell licensed products bearing the trademarks that we own or that we have designed and developed.

For certain of our key legacy brands, including Cherokee, Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk, we have shifted our strategy for the Flip Flop Shops brand with franchisees that operate Flip Flop Shops retail stores located worldwide.

We believe that the DirectU.S. sales from DTR licensing to Retail licensing model generally offers each licensee, or retailer, the exclusive right to market multiple categories of products with a recognized brand within their territory, thereby offering licensees the ability to enhance their marketing strategies and achieve a competitive advantage over competing retailers. This differentiation can also provide the retailer/licensee an opportunity to command a “premium” over private label price points, which can result in increased profit margins, even after royalties have been paid to the licensor. The licensees generally directly source their own inventory, thereby eliminating the licensor’s exposure to inventory and

31


manufacturing risk while allowing the licensees to benefit from large economies of scale.wholesale licensing.  In addition, we believe that ourare primarily pursuing a wholesale licensing strategy for global sales of our Hi-Tec, Magnum, Interceptor and franchise relationships will50 Peaks brands.  We believe wholesale licensing arrangements help to diversify our sources of revenue and licensee or other partner relationships, and willmay provide additional avenues to obtain brand recognition and grow our Company, including the opportunity to further expand the reachCompany.

23


Table of our brands into markets where a DTR licensing model may not be the most effective approach.Contents

We believe our retail responsiveness process and 360-degree value proposition have allowed Cherokee Global Brands to address the growing power of the consumer and the present and future needs of the retailers that are selling our portfolio of lifestyle brands. Based on consumer research, retail insights and brand insights that we continually measure, evaluate and incorporate into our 360-degree platform, we believe Cherokee Global Brands has become a key strategic partner to our licensees. As of January 28, 2017, we had 124 continuing license agreements in over 110 countries, 24 of which pertained to the Cherokee brand and 81 of which pertain to the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands.

We are guided by three value pillars that speak to our diverse global partners, Vision, Agility, Scale:

Vision—Brand vision that will drive differentiation and a fresh point of view to engage customers across every touch point and in multiple categories.

Agility—The agility of our unique 360-degree platform to quickly seize opportunity and swiftly introduce our branded products.

Scale—The ability to fully leverage our brands’ physical and digital spaces with multi-category relevancy and with globally recognized brands that drive a seamless customer experience.

We derive revenues primarily from licensing our trademarks to retailers and wholesalers all over the world. Our current licenseeworld, and we are continually pursuing relationships cover over 110 countrieswith new retailers, wholesalers and over 12,000 retailothers in order to expand the reach of our existing brands into new geographic and customer markets and new types of stores and online businesses andother selling mediums.  As of February 1, 2020, we had 42 continuing license agreements in approximately 144 countries.  These arrangements include relationships with Walmart, Target Corporation (“Target”), Kohl’s Illinois, Inc. (“Kohl’s”), Soriana, Comercial Mexicana, TJ Maxx, Tottus, Pick N Pay, Nishimatsuya Walmart, Big 5, Academy,Arvind, Reliance Retail, Tharanco, Martes Sports, Hi-Tec Europe, Hi-Tec South Africa, JD Sports, Black’s and REI. Our two most significant licensees in Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016, and Fiscal 2015 were Target and Kohl’s.

Major Factors Affecting Our Performance

TermsLidl.  As of Royalty Arrangements

Generally, royalty rates for our DirectFebruary 1, 2020, we had contractual rights to Retail license agreements vary as a percentagereceive over $55.0 million of the retailer’s net retail sales of licensed products. In some cases, royalty rates are calculated based upon a fixed percentage of product sales. In other cases we have license agreements that provide for reduced royalty rates based on volume thresholds once specified cumulative levels of retail sales of merchandise in certain product categories are achieved during each fiscal year. The royalty rate reductions do not apply retroactively to the applicable licensee’s retail sales since the beginning of the year, but rather apply only to sales made during the applicable fiscal year subsequent to the achievement of the specified sales volume. For example, the amount of royalty revenue earned by us from Target in any quarter was dependent not only on Target’s retail sales of Cherokee branded products in the U.S. in that quarter, but also on the royalty rate then in effect after considering their cumulative level of retail sales for certain Cherokee branded products in the U.S. for the fiscal year. As a result, for such license agreements, ourforward‑facing minimum royalty revenues, as a percentage of our licensees’ retail sales were typically highest at the beginning of each fiscal year and decreased if and when certain retail sales thresholds were met. Historically, this has caused our first quarter toexcluding any revenues that may be our highest revenue and profitability quarter and our fourth quarter to be our lowest revenue and profitability quarter. However, such historical patterns and seasonal trends may vary significantlyguaranteed in future periods, depending upon retail sales volumes achieved in each quarter by Target, the revenues we receive from Target and our other licensees that are not subject to reduced royalty rates based upon cumulative sales, and the terms of any new license agreements.connection with contract renewals.  

The terms of our royalty arrangements vary for each of our licensees.  In most cases we require the licensee to guarantee a minimum royalty. These minimum royalty guarantees require our licensees to pay us a minimum royalty each year. In the case of Target, its minimum annual guaranteed royalty was $10.5 million for Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal

32


2017, and in the case of Kohl’s, its minimum annual guaranteed royalty was $4.8 million for Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 and $4.6 million for Fiscal 2018.

As of January 28, 2017, we had contractual rights to receive over $108.8 million forward‑facing minimum royalty revenues over the next six years, excluding any revenues that may be guaranteed in connection with contract renewals.

Performance of Our Licensees and Franchisees

Pursuant to our typical arrangements with our licensees, weWe receive quarterly royalty statements and periodic retail sales and purchasing information for Cherokee branded productsfrom our licensees and other product brands that we own or represent. Additionally, pursuant to our typical franchise agreements, franchisees pay us a royalty fee based on a percentage of gross sales at each franchise retail location.franchisees.  However, our licensees and franchisees are generally not required to provide, and typically do not provide, information that would enable us to determine the specific reasons for period‑to‑period fluctuations in retail sales.sales or purchases.  As a result, and except as noted elsewhere in the comparisons of our three most recently completed fiscal years, we do not typically have sufficient information to determine the effects on our operations of changes in price, volume or mix of products soldsold.

Recent Developments

COVID-19 Global Pandemic

Our business has been materially adversely affected by the effects of the global pandemic of COVID-19 and the related protective public health measures that began in earnest in March 2020. Our business depends upon purchases and sales of our branded products by our licensees, and franchisees. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors”.

Foreign Currency Exchange Translation

Because the majorityprevalence of shelter-in-place orders in the regions where our products are sold, together with the closure of many of our international revenue is denominatedlicensees’ or their customers’ stores, have resulted in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currencies of our international licensees’ operations may impact our royalty revenues. The main foreign currencies we encountersignificant declines in our operations are the Mexican Peso, the EURO, the Great British Pound, the South African Rand, the Japanese Yen, the Chinese Yuan, the Indian Rupeeroyalties, which will likely continue for some period of time, and the Canadian Dollar. We do not currently engage in currency hedging activities to limit the risk of exchange rate fluctuations.

Additionally, we generally record the sales of our international licensees and franchisees in U.S. dollars, and our disclosure related to the sales of such licensees and franchisees throughout this Annual Report is denominated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. In arriving at such denominations, we receive a schedule of retail sales on a monthly and/or quarterly basis from eachvarious of our licensees have requested extensions of time for them to pay their royalties to us.  Our licensees manufacture and franchiseesdistribute goods that carry our brands, and the temporary closures of the facilities used by our licensees to perform these functions could cause further or extended declines in sales and royalties.

In response to the decline in revenues, we have implemented cost savings measures, including pay reductions, employee furloughs and other measures.  We can provide no assurance that these cost savings measures will not cause our business operations and results to suffer.  Our current forecasts indicate that we will generally be able to maintain our profit margins as a result of these efforts, even though the amount of anticipated profit is lower.  It is not possible to predict with certainty the impact that the shelter-in-place orders and other business restrictions will have on our licensees and, therefore, our royalty revenues in the future.  The ultimate impact will be greater the longer these restrictions remain in place.

The decline and anticipated decline in our revenues also exposes us to the risk that we will remain non-compliant with the covenants in our credit facility, which creates risk that our lender will exercise its rights to accelerate the amounts payable and foreclose on our assets.  For further information, refer to the credit facilities section below under the caption, Liquidity and Capital Resources.

We have not been designated as an essential business, and therefore our offices in Sherman Oaks California and Amsterdam in the Netherlands have been closed.  However, the nature of the work performed by our employees does not require us to assemble in our facilities, and we have successfully implemented work-from-home strategies using technologies that we generally had in place before the onset of the pandemic. These strategies may result in inefficiencies and lost opportunities, but they are not expected to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.  In previous years, we have successfully implemented cloud-based accounting systems that provide for remote access.  We are also unable to travel to meetings with our licensees or their customers, which historically has been an important component of our business strategy.  Our use of video conferencing technologies has been expanded and has proven effective, yet business opportunities may be diminished or lost due to the lack of in-person contact.

In March 2020, the federal government passed the CARES Act, which has several provisions that are expected to be beneficial to our Company.  On April 20, 2020, we received a $0.7 million loan under the Paycheck Protection Program that is denominatedbeing implemented by the Small Business Administration and multiple commercial banks across the country.  We anticipate that a substantial portion of this loan will be forgiven based on the amount we incur for payroll, rent and utilities in the applicableeight weeks following the grant date of the loan.  The portion of the loan that is not forgiven will bear interest at 1.0% per annum and will mature two years from the date of funding.

24


Table of Contents

The CARES Act also enacted changes in the federal income tax loss carryback rules that we expect will benefit us.  Net operating losses that we incurred in Fiscal 2018, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2020 can now be carried back either two or five years to tax years when we paid significant taxes.  Initial estimates of the refundable taxes and foreign currency.tax credits are approximately $8.0 million, including approximately $6.0 million to $7.0 million from losses incurred in Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2019.  These amounts are then convertedsubject to change as we prepare the necessary filings.  We are in the process of preparing such carryback tax filings, however, the timing of receiving such refunds is uncertain and can range from approximately three to twelve months or more depending on the operations of the Internal Revenue Service.  Additional carryback refund claims will also be made based on the final determination of our tax net operating loss for Fiscal 2020.  The receipt of these tax refunds would significantly enhance our liquidity.

Reverse Stock Split

In September 2019, we effected a one-for-three reverse stock split of our common stock.  The reverse stock split reduced the number of our Company’s outstanding shares of common stock from approximately 16.6 million shares to approximately 5.5 million shares and reduced the number of authorized shares of common stock from 30.0 million shares to 10.0 million shares.  Unless the context otherwise requires, all share and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements have been revised to reflect the reverse stock split, including reclassifying an amount equal to the reduction in par value of our common stock to additional paid-in capital.

Revenue Overview

We typically enter into license agreements with retailers, manufacturers and distributors for a certain brand in specific product categories over explicit territories, which can include one country or groups of countries and territories.  Our royalty revenues are globally diversified, generated from multiple licensees in the following geographic regions:

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

 

February 1, 2020

 

 

 

February 2, 2019

 

U.S. and Canada

 

$

 

5,223

 

 

 

25

%

 

$

 

6,383

 

 

 

26

%

EMEA

 

 

 

5,229

 

 

 

25

%

 

 

 

8,015

 

 

 

33

%

Asia and Pacific

 

 

 

7,168

 

 

 

34

%

 

 

 

6,046

 

 

 

25

%

Latin America

 

 

 

3,421

 

 

 

16

%

 

 

 

4,000

 

 

 

16

%

Revenues

 

$

 

21,041

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

 

24,444

 

 

 

100

%

United States and Canada.  A substantial portion of our royalty revenues in the U.S. dollars using the appropriate exchange rateand Canada come from wholesale license arrangements for the purposesale of disclosing all retail salesfootwear bearing our Hi-Tec, Magnum and Interceptor brands.  The U.S. has increased tariff rates on apparel and footwear, and we believe our licensees who use manufacturing facilities in U.S. dollars. For all periods presented incountries subject to increased tariffs have taken steps to offset the impact of higher tariffs, including moving production to countries not subject to higher tariffs and negotiating lower costs with existing suppliers.  Nonetheless, our royalty revenues have decreased as our licensees adapt to this Annual Report, we do not consider the period‑to‑period fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates to have had a significant effect on the accuracy of the U.S. dollar‑denominated figures presented in this Annual Report.new tariff environment.

Recent Developments

Expiration of Target License Agreement for the Cherokee BrandEMEA.  Revenues from our licensees in the United States

Until January 31, 2017, Target had exclusive rights to Cherokee branded products for all product categoriesKingdom and other countries in the United States. Royalty revenues from Target’s sales of Cherokee branded products accounted for greater than 35%this region decreased by 8% as a component of our total revenues during eachcompared to Fiscal 2019. Pan European royalties from our Cherokee brand licensee in Fiscal 2019 repeated at lower levels in Fiscal 2020, and our South African Cherokee licensee did not renew their license at the end of Fiscal 2017,2019.  Royalties from our Hi-Tec and Magnum licensee in the United Kingdom were also lower in Fiscal 20162020.  Sales of products by certain of our licensees that operate in Europe were negatively affected by the economic uncertainty surrounding Brexit. We believe this had a negative effect on these licensees’ businesses during Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2015. However,a corresponding negative impact on our licenseroyalty revenues.

Asia and Pacific.  The growth in our royalty revenues in the Asia/Pacific region came primarily from our product development and design services agreement with Target covering salesa major retailer in the People’s Republic of most China.  We are providing our product design and development expertise for a brand that they own, which we believe will efficiently enhance their retail operations.  Our Cherokee licensee in Japan opted to not renew their license at the end of Fiscal 2020.  This is expected to decrease our revenues in this region in Fiscal 2021, and possibly longer, as we transition to a new licensee.

Latin America.  Our royalty revenues in Latin America resulted primarily from our Cherokee Brand and Everyday California licensees in Mexico, Peru and Chile.  Our Hi-Tec and Magnum brands are also distributed in various other countries in Latin America.

25


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The table below contains certain information about our operations from our consolidated statements of operations along with other data and percentages.  Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods.

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

 

February 1, 2020

 

 

 

February 2, 2019

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cherokee

 

$

 

6,741

 

 

 

32.0

%

 

$

 

9,706

 

 

 

39.7

%

Hi-Tec, Magnum, Interceptor and 50 Peaks

 

 

 

10,525

 

 

 

50.0

%

 

 

 

11,564

 

 

 

47.3

%

Hawk

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

1.2

%

 

 

 

602

 

 

 

2.5

%

Other brands

 

 

 

3,517

 

 

 

16.7

%

 

 

 

2,572

 

 

 

10.5

%

Total revenues

 

 

 

21,041

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

24,444

 

 

 

100.0

%

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and, administrative expenses

 

 

 

13,255

 

 

 

63.0

%

 

 

 

14,638

 

 

 

59.9

%

Stock-based compensation and stock warrant charges

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

4.9

%

 

 

 

890

 

 

 

3.6

%

Business acquisition and integration costs

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

1.3

%

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

1,134

 

 

 

5.4

%

 

 

 

5,755

 

 

 

23.5

%

Intangible assets and goodwill impairment charge

 

 

 

9,100

 

 

 

43.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

(479

)

 

 

-2.0

%

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

1,167

 

 

 

5.5

%

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

6.0

%

Total operating expenses

 

 

 

25,972

 

 

 

123.4

%

 

 

 

22,589

 

 

 

92.4

%

Operating (loss) income

 

 

 

(4,931

)

 

 

-23.4

%

 

 

 

1,855

 

 

 

7.6

%

Interest expense and other expense

 

 

 

(8,901

)

 

 

-42.3

%

 

 

 

(11,493

)

 

 

-47.0

%

Loss before income taxes

 

 

 

(13,832

)

 

 

-65.7

%

 

 

 

(9,638

)

 

 

-39.4

%

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

 

 

 

(2,332

)

 

 

-11.0

%

 

 

 

1,901

 

 

 

7.7

%

Net loss

 

$

 

(11,500

)

 

 

-54.7

%

 

$

 

(11,539

)

 

 

-47.1

%

Non-GAAP data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

$

 

7,786

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

9,806

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income before (i) interest expense, (ii) other expense, (iii) provision for income taxes, (iv) depreciation and amortization, (v) intangible asset impairment charge, (vi) gain on sale of assets, (vii) restructuring charges, (viii) business acquisition and integration costs and (ix) stock-based compensation and stock warrant charges.  Adjusted EBITDA is not defined under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and it may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.  We use Adjusted EBITDA, along with other GAAP measures, as a measure of profitability, because Adjusted EBITDA helps us compare our performance on a consistent basis by removing from our operating results the impact of our capital structure, the effect of operating in different tax jurisdictions, the impact of our asset base, which can differ depending on the book value of assets and the accounting methods used to compute depreciation and amortization, and the cost of acquiring or disposing of businesses and restructuring our operations.  We believe it is useful to investors for the same reasons.  Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as a profitability measure in that it does not include the interest expense on our long-term debt, our provision for income taxes, the effect of our expenditures for capital assets and certain intangible assets, or the costs of acquiring or disposing of businesses and restructuring our operations, or our non-cash charges for stock-based compensation and stock warrants.  See a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to our consolidated statement of operations in Item 6. of this Annual Report. 

Fiscal 2020 Compared to Fiscal 2019

The decrease in royalty revenues in Fiscal 2020 was primarily due to the decrease in Cherokee, Hi-Tec and Magnum royalties from our European licensees, the expiration of our Cherokee license in South Africa at the end of Fiscal 2019, the impact of higher tariffs and the sale of our Flip Flop Shops franchise business in June 2018.  These decreases were partially offset by a full year of revenues in Fiscal 2020 from our new design services agreement with a retailer in China, which started midway through Fiscal 2019

26


Table of Contents

Cherokee

Cherokee branded products have been distributed in the United States expired on January 31, 2017. We have entered into newunder wholesale licensing agreements, discussed below under “New Licensee Partners,” which are intendedarrangements generally for the past several years.  Prior to replace our former relationship with Target forthat, sales of Cherokee branded products in the United States. However, replacingStates were governed by our DTR license agreement with Target.  These new wholesale arrangements consist of multiple license agreements with different distributors that include higher royalty rates but lower minimum annual royalty obligations, as compared to our previous license agreement with Target.  A large majority of our Cherokee brand royalties are now derived from multiple DTR license agreements with various retailers outside the United States, many of which have been in place for multiple years.  Our DTR licensee in South Africa opted to not renew their Cherokee brand license at the end of Fiscal 2019, and our pan-European Cherokee brand licensee reduced their planned sales of Cherokee product in Fiscal 2020.  These factors are the primary reasons for the decrease in Cherokee brand royalties.  Our overall royalty revenues received from Target forour licensees’ sales of Cherokee branded products is a significant challenge, anddecreased 31% to $6.7 million in Fiscal 2020 from $9.7 million in Fiscal 2019, primarily due to the expiration of thismultiple license agreement may have a material adverse effect on our business. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for additional information.during Fiscal 2019.  

Acquisition of Hi-Tec, Magnum, Interceptor and Magnum Brands50 Peaks

OnIn December 7, 2016, we closed a Share Purchase Agreement (“Hi-Tec Acquisition” or “SPA”) with Hi-Tec International Holdings BV (“Hi-Tec”) and simultaneous Asset Purchase Agreements (“APAs”) with various third parties, pursuant to which Cherokee Global Brands acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Hi-Tec

33


for $87.2 million in cash, excluding non-interest bearing liabilities assumed and capitalized transaction costs. Cherokee Global Brands created a legal entity entitled Irene Acquisition Company B.V. (the “buyer”) to execute the transaction.

We completed the Hi-Tec Acquisition withwhereby we acquired the objective of converting Hi-Tec into a licensing business that would align with our core business. Thus, concurrently with the SPA, we entered into APAs with new operating partnersintellectual property of Hi-Tec, including Carolina Footwear Group, LLC (“CFG or Carolina”), Batra Limited (“BL or Batra”) and Sunningdale (“South Africa”). These agreements provided for the sale of certain manufacturing-related operating assets of Hi-Tec and its subsidiaries to these operating partners.  Post-acquisition, consistent with our planned conversion of the Hi-Tec, business, we continue to own the intellectual property assets of Hi-Tec,Magnum, Interceptor and have entered into license agreements with three main licensees Batra (UK50-Peaks brands and Europe), Carolina (USrelated trademarks.  At that time and Canada) and Sunningdale (South Africa). The Company does not have any ownership interests in the CFG, BL or South Africa entities.

Hi-Tec and its subsidiaries were a Dutch footwear business that design, market and sell footwear globally, primarily under the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands. Hi-Tec sold its products through major retailers, independent distributors, licensees, government contracts and directly to consumers via e-commerce. Prior to the Hi-Tec Acquisition, Hi-Tec operated under a full spectrum distribution model, meaning that one group of affiliated companies owned the brands and manufactured the products. Through the Sale Transactions and our post-acquisition integration efforts,following year, we are converting the Hi-Tec business to a branded licensing model.  Until this conversion is complete, we conduct indirect product sales of footwear bearing these brands to certain select wholesalers and government entities, which represent a minor portion of the customers of these brands.  Going forward, we primarily intend to pursue a wholesale licensing model for these brands. Our acquisition of the Hi-Tec and Magnum brands and conversion of these brands to a new business model is subject to significant risks. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for additional information.

In connection with the closing of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, substantially all of the then-existing indebtedness of Hi-Tec has been repaid. The SPA contains customary warranties and indemnities for a Dutch transaction. Subject to certain carve-outs and qualifications as set forth in the SPA and subject to certain limited exceptions, our recourse for breaches of warranties under the SPA will be to a warranty and indemnity insurance policy.

We funded the purchase price of the Hi-Tec Acquisition through cash on hand, proceeds from the Sale Transactions, the prepayment of the first year of guaranteed minimum royalties under license agreements with certain operating partners and/or distributors of Hi-Tec, net proceeds of a public offering of our common stock, proceeds from a new credit facility and proceeds from a receivables funding loan extended by one of our directors, each of which is described below.

Sale Transactions

On November 29, 2016, we entered into sales agreements with operating partners and/or distributors of Hi-Tec, including Carolina Footwear Group, LLC and Batra Limited. These sales agreements provide for the sale of certain of the operating assets of Hi-Tec and its subsidiaries to these operating partners and/or distributors. The aggregate cash purchase price of the Sale Transactions was approximately $11.3 million, based on expected working capital and subject to certain post-closing adjustments. The Sales Transactions closed substantially concurrently with the closing of the Hi-Tec Acquisition on December 7, 2016.  We used the proceeds from the Sale Transaction to fund a portion of the purchase price for the Hi-Tec Acquisition.

Wholesale License Agreements

Consistent with our planned conversion of the Hi-Tec business to our business model, we continue to own the intellectual property assets of Hi-Tec following the Sale Transactions, and certain of the operating partners and/or distributors have entered into wholesale license agreements with us to license certain of these trademarks from, and pay royalties to, us. Under these wholesale license agreements, certain of Hi-Tec’s operating partners and/or distributors have licensed certainto sell Hi-Tec, trademarksMagnum, Interceptor and 50 Peaks branded products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, continental Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Russia, Asia Pacific, South Africa and other jurisdictionsterritories.  These arrangements are structured similarly to our other wholesale licensing arrangements.  Issues surrounding Brexit and increased tariffs on footwear and apparel in Africa.the United States negatively impacted our Fiscal 2020 royalties from licensees of Hi-Tec, Magnum, Interceptor and 50 Peaks in comparison to Fiscal 2019.  Overall, our royalty revenues from our licensees’ sales of Hi-Tec, Magnum, Interceptor and 50-Peaks branded products decreased 9% to $10.5 million in Fiscal 2020 from $11.6 million in Fiscal 2019.

Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk

Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk branded products have been distributed in the United States under wholesale licensing arrangements generally for the past several years.  Prior to that, sales of Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk branded products in the United States were made under our DTR license agreement with Kohl’s.  We usedalso had a DTR license agreement with a Canadian retailer for the $7.0 million prepaymentdistribution of these products, which did not renew at the first few yearsend of guaranteed minimum royalties under theseFiscal 2019.  Royalty revenues from our license agreements to pay a portion of the purchase price for the Hi-Tec Acquisition.sale of Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk branded products decreased to $0.3 million in Fiscal 2020 from $0.6 million in Fiscal 2019.

Other Brands

Our product development and design services agreement with a major retailer in the People’s Republic of China started in the middle of Fiscal 2019, and having a full year of revenues from this agreement in Fiscal 2020 is the primary reason for the increase in revenues from other brands.  This increase was partially offset by the disposition of our Flip Flop Shops franchise business in the second quarter of Fiscal 2019. Royalty revenues from our other brands increased 37% to $3.5 million in Fiscal 2020 from $2.6 million in Fiscal 2019

34Operating Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 9% to $13.3 million in Fiscal 2020 from $14.6 million in Fiscal 2019.  These ongoing expenses include payroll, employee benefits, marketing, sales, legal, rent, information systems and other administrative costs that are part of our ongoing operations.  This $1.3 million decrease reflects our restructuring plans that we implemented during Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019 to improve our organizational efficiencies by eliminating redundant positions and unneeded facilities, and by terminating various consulting and marketing contracts.  We incurred a $1.1 million charge in Fiscal 2020 and a $5.8 million charge in Fiscal 2019 as a result of implementing these plans. We believe that these changes eliminate unnecessary costs and enable us to operate effectively going forward as we leverage one executive structure to manage our business globally.

Stock-based compensation and stock warrant charges in Fiscal 2020 totaled $1.0 million compared to $0.9 million in Fiscal 2019, and comprises charges related to stock option and restricted stock grants.  We incurred $0.3 million of legal, due diligence and other costs related to business acquisition and integration in both Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019.

27


We own various trademarks that are considered to have indefinite lives, while others are being amortized over their estimated useful lives.  We also have furniture, fixtures and other equipment that is being amortized over their useful lives.  Our royalty revenues from Hi-Tec, Magnum and Interceptor were significantly below previous forecasts for the third quarter of Fiscal 2020, which affected our revenue projections in the near term for these brands.  As these trademarks have indefinite lives and are not being amortized, we updated our projected cash flows for these brands and determined that the fair values of these trademarks were not in excess of their carrying values, and as a result, an impairment charge of $5.0 million was recorded during year ended February 1, 2020 to adjust these trademarks to their estimated fair value.  The fair value of the Company’s Interceptor brand was in excess of its carrying value, so no impairment charge was necessary based on the interim test.  However, the Company believes that increased tariffs and global trade wars have negatively impacted the competitive and economic environment in which Interceptor operates, and an indefinite life is no longer supported.  Accordingly, the Interceptor trademark with estimated value of $2.1 million is now being amortized over its estimated remaining useful life.  During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2020, management completed its evaluation of key inputs used to estimate the fair value of its indefinite lived trademarks and determined that the interim impairment charge was appropriate.  

Public OfferingOur goodwill impairment test, which is required at least annually, is based primarily on the relationship between our market capitalization and the book value of our equity adjusted for an estimated control premium and other factors that may indicate our market capitalization does not represent fair value. Our impairment test at the end of Fiscal 2020 indicated that the Company’s goodwill was impaired, and an impairment charge of $4.1 million was recorded to reduce goodwill to its estimated fair value.

The assumptions we use to estimate fair value of our indefinite lived intangibles and goodwill may change materially as we re-evaluate them in light of the COVID-19 global pandemic when we complete the accounting for our first quarter financial results for the three months ending May 2, 2020 or in future periods.  These new assumptions may indicate the need for future impairment charges if revenues are projected at that point to be significantly below current forecasts and/or if our market capitalization remains low.  

Interest Expense and Other Income

Interest expense was $8.8 million in Fiscal 2020 compared to $8.2 million in Fiscal 2019.  In addition to our normal interest expense that is based on LIBOR and amortizing deferred financing charges, the remaining $3.2 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with our former credit facility were charged to other expense as a result of the repayment in Fiscal 2019.

Provision for Income Taxes

In Fiscal 2020, our effective tax rate was 16.8% while for Fiscal 2019, it was negative 19.7%.  Prior to Fiscal 2020, the benefits of the deferred tax assets of the foreign subsidiaries we acquired in the Hi-Tec Acquisition were not being recognized due to the cumulative losses generated by those foreign subsidiaries.  Even though we generated pretax losses in Fiscal 2019, we did not recognize tax benefits in that year, but we recorded an income tax provision of $1.9 million primarily as a result of deferred tax valuation allowances.  In Fiscal 2020, however, we obtained approval to combine certain of our subsidiaries in the Netherlands as one tax filing group.  This determination allowed the Company to recognize tax benefits for a majority of the remaining uncertain tax positions taken in prior years.  The Hi-Tec and Magnum indefinite-lived trademarks acquired in the Hi-Tec Acquisition result in a deferred tax liability that has an indefinite life and cannot be used as a source of taxable income to support the realization of other deferred tax assets.  Accordingly, the valuation allowance reserves for the deferred tax assets in these foreign jurisdictions and results in a “naked credit” for these indefinite-lived trademarks.  This naked credit would only result in a cash obligation when the underlying trademark assets were sold, but it results in deferred tax expense as the trademark assets are amortized for tax purposes.  This naked credit, which has historically been denominated in euros, also fluctuated in Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019 due to changes in the exchange rate between euros and U.S. dollars.

The benefits of tax losses in our U.S. tax jurisdiction are not being recognized primarily because of accumulated losses generated.  However, the CARES Act, which was enacted by the U.S. government in March 2020, enables us to carry back certain federal net operating losses to previous fiscal years when we reported taxable and paid federal income taxes.  We are in the process of finalizing the impact of these carrybacks and expect such benefits to be recorded in our consolidated financial statements in the first quarter of Fiscal 2021 when the law was passed.  Our current estimate of these benefits is approximately $8.0 million, which is subject to change, and is expected to be received in various installments as our carry back claims and amended returns are received and processed by the Internal Revenue Service.  The timing of such refunds cannot be assured.

28


Table of Contents

Net Loss and Adjusted EBITDA

Our net loss was $11.5 million in Fiscal 2020 and $11.5 million in Fiscal 2019 as a result of the above factors, which equates to a loss of $2.12 per share and $2.45 per share on a diluted basis in Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively.  Our Adjusted EBITDA decreased to $7.8 million in Fiscal 2020 from $9.8 million in Fiscal 2019.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We generally finance our working capital needs and capital investments with operating cash flows, terms loans, subordinated promissory notes and lines of credit.  On August 3, 2018, entered into a $40.0 million term loan and $13.5 million of subordinated promissory notes, and on January 30, 2019, we obtained an incremental $5.3 million term loan. On December 2, 2016,31, 2019 we closedissued a $0.3 million subordinated promissory note to our former landlord as partial consideration for an underwritten public offeringearly lease termination.  

Cash Flows

We used $2.4 million of 4,237,750 sharescash in our operating activities related to our continuing operations in Fiscal 2020 compared to $8.6 million of cash used in Fiscal 2019.  This $6.2 million improvement in cash flow from continuing operations resulted primarily from using less cash to fund our restructuring obligations and accounts payable in Fiscal 2020 in comparison to Fiscal 2019.  This improvement in cash flow was partially offset by lower collections from our licensees in Fiscal 2020 in comparison to Fiscal 2019 when we collected cash from our sales and distribution business that was sold to International Brands Group during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2018.    

We used $0.2 million of cash from our investing activities in Fiscal 2020 compared to $5.3 million provided by investing activities in Fiscal 2019.  Capital investments in both years comprise our continual expenditures to maintain our trademarks around the world, along with recurring capital investments in property and equipment.  Fiscal 2019 also includes $5.6 million received from the disposition of our commonFlip Flop Shops franchise business and the sale of our remaining sales and distribution operations of Hi-Tec to International Brands Group.

Our financing activities used $0.4 million of cash in Fiscal 2020.  Principal repayments on our term loans were partially offset by proceeds received from the exercise of stock at a public offering price of $9.50 per share, for net proceeds to us of approximately $38.0 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses paid by us. We used thewarrants.  In Fiscal 2019, we refinanced our former credit facility, resulting in net proceeds of $5.5 million after the offering to fund a portionpayment of the purchase price for the Hi-Tec Acquisition.debt issuance costs.

Cerberus Credit FacilityFacilities and CARES Act Benefits

On December 7, 2016,August 3, 2018, we entered intoreplaced our previous credit facility with a combination of a new senior secured credit facility, with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC (“Cerberus”), as administrative agentwhich provided a $40.0 million term loan, and collateral agent for$13.5 million of subordinated secured promissory notes.  On January 30, 2019, the lenders from time to time party thereto, pursuant to which we are permitted to borrow (i) up to $5.0 million under a revolving credit facility was amended to provide an additional $5.3 million term loan. The term loans mature in August 2021 and (ii) up to $45.0require quarterly principal payments and monthly interest payments based on LIBOR plus a margin.  The additional $5.3 million under a term loan facility. Also on December 7, 2016, we drew down $45.0 million underalso requires interest of 3.0% payable in kind with such interest being added to the Cerberus term loan facility and used a portion of these borrowings to fund the Hi-Tec Acquisition, including the repaymentprincipal balance of the outstanding indebtedness of Hi-Tec, and to repay all amounts owed under our former credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”).  During March 2017, the Company drew $5.0 million under its available revolving credit facility with Cerberus.

loan.  The Cerberus credit facility isterm loans are secured by a first priority lien on, and security interest in, substantially all of our assets and those of our subsidiaries, isare guaranteed by our subsidiariessubsidiaries.  The $13.5 million of subordinated promissory notes mature in November 2021, and hasthey are secured by a five-year term.second priority lien on substantially all of our assets and guaranteed by our subsidiaries.  Interest is payable monthly on the subordinated promissory notes, but no periodic amortization payments are required.  The Cerberussubordinated promissory notes are subordinated in rights of payment and priority to the term loan but otherwise have economic terms substantially similar to the term loan.  Excluding the interest payable in kind, the weighted-average interest rate on both the term loan and subordinated promissory notes at February 1, 2020 was 11.0%.  Outstanding borrowings under the senior secured credit facility bears interestwere $44.1 million at a rate per annum equal to either the rate of interest publicly announced from time to time by JPMorgan in New York, New York as its reference rate, base rate or prime rate or LIBOR plus, in each case, the applicable marginFebruary 1, 2020, and outstanding subordinated secured promissory notes were $13.5 million.

The term loan is subject to the applicable rate floor. Borrowings under the Cerberus credit facility are subject to certain maintenancea borrowing base and other fees. The terms of the Cerberus credit facility includeincludes financial covenants that set financial standards we will be required to maintain and operating covenants that impose various restrictions and obligations regarding the operation of our business that are customary in facilities of this type, including limitations on the payment of dividends.  Financial covenants include the requirement to maintain specified levels of Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement (approximately $9.5 million for the trailing twelve months as of February 1, 2020), and maintain a minimum cash balance of $1.0 million.  We are required to maintain a borrowing base comprising the value of our trademarks that exceeds the outstanding balance of the term loan.  If the borrowing base is less than the outstanding term loan at any measurement period, then we would be required to repay a portion of the term loan to eliminate such shortfall.

29


Table of Contents

Our operating results for the twelve months ended November 2, 2019 and twelve months ended February 1, 2020 resulted in violations of the minimum Adjusted EBITDA covenant, which are events of default.  Revenues for the third quarter of Fiscal 2020 were lower than the Company’s business, including covenantsprevious forecasts due to lower than expected royalties reported by the Company’s licensees, which were negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty surrounding Brexit, global trade wars and increasing tariffs on footwear and apparel, along with the weakening of the British pound sterling and euro in relation to the U.S. dollar.  In response, management enacted certain cash savings measures, and although operating results improved during the three months ended February 1, 2020, the cash savings measures and operational improvements were not enough to regain compliance with the Adjusted EBITDA covenant.  Our latest financial projections, which have been revised to account for the current information we have regarding the potential impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic, indicate that require usthere is a significant risk of further violations of the minimum Adjusted EBITDA covenant beyond the forbearance period agreed to obtain Cerberus’s consent before we can take certain specified actions.with our senior lender.  

Receivables Funding Loan

On December 7, 2016, we entered intoOur senior lender has agreed to forbear from enforcing its rights under the senior secured credit facility through July 27, 2020.  Beginning with May 1, 2020 and continuing through the term of the forbearance agreement, interest and loan amortization payments will not be paid in cash, but an unsecured receivables funding loan agreement for $5.0 million with Jess Ravich, the Chairman of our board of directors (“Board of Directors”). The receivables funding loan bears interest at a rate of 9.5% per annum and is subjectequivalent amount will be added to a fee equal to 2.5% of the principal amount of the loan, or $0.1term loans to be repaid in future periods.  Our required minimum cash balance was reduced during the forbearance period, and the senior lender agreed that the proceeds from the April 2020 Paycheck Protection Program promissory note of $0.7 million which was paid atcan be used for the fundingworking capital purposes specified under the promissory note.  We are required during the forbearance period to evaluate strategic alternatives designed to provide liquidity to repay the term loans under the senior secured credit facility.  In exchange for these concessions, the senior lender will receive an additional fee totaling 2% of the loan. Thethen outstanding principal and accrued interestloan balance when the debt is repaid.

Future compliance failures would subject us to significant risks, including the right of our senior lender to terminate their obligations under the receivables funding loan willCredit Facility, declare all or any portion of the borrowed amounts then outstanding to be accelerated and due and payable, and/or exercise any other right or remedies they may have under applicable law, including foreclosing on June 5, 2017. The proceedsour assets that serve as collateral for the borrowed amounts.  If any of these rights were to be exercised, our financial condition and ability to continue operations would be materially jeopardized.  If we are unable to meet our obligations to our lenders and other creditors, we may have to significantly curtail or even cease operations.  Because of this uncertainty, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  We are evaluating potential sources of working capital, including the disposition of certain assets, and we believe that the NOL carryback provisions of the receivables funding loan were used to fundCARES Act will result in additional liquidity, although the timing of these cash inflows is uncertain.  We received $0.7 million of proceeds on April 20, 2020 from a portionpromissory note issued by one of our banks under the purchase price forPaycheck Protection Program included in the Hi-Tec Acquisition. We expect that certain accounts receivable assets thatCARES Act, and NOL carryback claims are expected to be collected in the ordinary coursetotal approximately $8.0 million.  We estimated that receipt of business will be usedthese tax refunds could range from three to repay the receivables funding loan. As of12 months from the date of this report,filing.  Our plans also include the outstanding principal balanceevaluation of strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value.  There is no assurance that we will be able to execute these plans or continue to operate as a going concern.

On December 28, 2018, we borrowed $2.0 million on a subordinated basis from a large stockholder and two board members to provide working capital. These notes were repaid on January 30, 2019 with proceeds from the receivables fundingadditional term loan is $1.5 million.under the Company’s senior secured credit facility.

Stock Repurchases

PursuantIn connection with the refinancing on August 3, 2018, we issued warrants to the approval of our Board of Directors, in June 2016 we repurchased and retired 60,082purchase 397,666 shares of our common stock in open market transactionsto our term loan lenders at a weighted average purchasean exercise price of $12.24$1.35 per share, and forwe issued warrants to purchase 533,333 shares of our common stock to certain holders of our subordinated promissory notes at an aggregate purchaseexercise price of approximately $735,000.

New Licensee Partners

As part of our strategy, we pursue relationships with new retailers, wholesalers$1.50 per share.  Each warrant is exercisable on issuance and other licensees in orderhas a seven-year life.  Warrants to expand the reach of our existing brands into new geographic and customer markets and new types of stores and other selling mediums. This strategy also involves diversifying our types of partner relationships to include additional DTR licensees, wholesale licensees and, with our acquisitionpurchase 230,000 shares of the Flip Flop Shops trademarkCompany’s common stock were also issued to the Company’s term loan lenders in connection with the additional $5.3 million term loan on January 30, 2019 at an exercise price of $2.28 per share with a 7-year life.  The fair values of these warrants were $1.2 million on their grant dates as determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model and brand name, franchiseeswere included as a noncash component of this brand.deferred financing costs.  The underlying shares of these warrants were registered for resale in November 2018.  In the first quarter of Fiscal 2020 and the 4th quarter of Fiscal 2019, the 533,333 stock warrant shares issued to our efforts to expandsubordinated promissory note holders were exercised and converted into our portfoliocommon stock for a cash exercise price of licensee partners, we acquired a number of new licensees for our existing brands in a variety of territories in Fiscal 2017, some of which are described below.$0.8 million.

30

35


The following table shows the lenders, their relationship to the company, the loan amounts provided at the time and the stock warrants issued to such investors, if any:

During Fiscal 2017,

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Term Loan

and

Junior Note

Amounts

 

 

Stock

Warrant

Shares

 

Term Loan lenders, unrelated parties

 

$

 

40,000

 

 

 

 

397,666

 

Additional Term Loan lenders, unrelated parties

 

 

 

5,250

 

 

 

 

230,000

 

Cove Street Capital, LLC, large stockholder

 

 

 

9,000

 

 

 

 

415,000

 

Jess Ravich, board member and large stockholder

 

 

 

4,400

 

 

 

 

118,333

 

Henry Stupp, Chief Executive Officer and board member

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

58,750

 

 

 

 

1,160,999

 

Lease Obligation

In November 2019, we entered into license agreements with nine wholesale distributors to distribute a variety of categories of products bearing the Cherokee brand to various retailers in the United States, which became operational at the beginning of Fiscal 2018.  The categories cover a wide range of Cherokee products including men’s and boy’s casual sportswear, sweaters and outerwear; newborn, infant and toddler boys and girls clothing and layette; girl’s active wear, sportswear, dresses, denim, and sweaters; and swimwear and sleepwear. These wholesale arrangements are intended to replace our former relationship with Target covering Cherokee branded products in the United States.

We entered into three additional license agreements (two during Fiscal 2017 and one during Fiscal 2018)lease termination agreement for our Hawk Signatureoffice building in Amsterdam, and Tony Hawk brands.accordingly, the lease terminated as of December 31, 2019 rather than continue through December 2026.  The license agreements arecompensation for broad distributionearly termination were cash payments totaling $0.6 million and a subordinated note of the brands in the United States for all retail, including specialty, mid-tier, regional, mass market, off-price and club retail.$0.3 million, excluding VAT, reducing our lease obligation by $2.4 million.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This discussion and analysis is based upon ourOur consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).  The preparation ofTo prepare these consolidated financial statements, requires management towe must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and relatedexpenses.  Judgment is also required about the disclosure of contingent assetsliabilities and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition, deferred revenue, income taxes, impairment of long‑lived assets, contingencies and litigation and stock‑based compensation. Management bases its estimates on historical and anticipated results, trends and various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions about future events. These estimates form the basis for making assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimatesmatters.  Estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actualuncertainty by their nature, and actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Management applies  We believe the following discussion addresses the critical accounting policies in the preparation ofthat are necessary to understand and evaluate our consolidatedreported financial statements:

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We record an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our assessment of various factors, such as historical experience, age of accounts receivable balances, credit quality of our licensees or franchisees, current economic conditions, bankruptcy, and other factors that may affect the licensees’ or franchisees’ ability to pay.results.

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidenceadopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method as of a sale arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the buyer’s price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from royalty and brand representation agreements are recognized when earned by applying contractual royalty rates to quarterly point of sale data received from our licensees. Our royalty revenue recognition policy provides for recognition of royalties in the quarter earned, although a large portion of such royalty payments are actually received during the month following the end of a quarter.

Our former license agreement with Target, which accounted for a large portion of our historical revenues, was structured to provide royalty rate reductions for sales of most products covered by the agreement after Target achieved certain cumulative sales volume thresholds, such that revenue was recognized by applying the reduced royalty rates prospectively to point of sale data for these products after the defined sales thresholds were exceeded for the remainder of applicable fiscal year. These royalty rate reductions did not apply retroactively to sales sinceFebruary 4, 2018, the beginning of the applicable fiscal year,first quarter of Fiscal 2019.  The adoption of the new guidance primarily affected the recognition of minimum guaranteed royalties in our license agreements that have historically been recognized as earned in accordance with those agreements, while under this new standard, such royalties are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the license agreements.  Accordingly, for license agreements with escalating minimum guaranteed royalties, revenues will generally be higher during the early years of the license agreement than they would have been under the previous guidance.  The cumulative effect on adoption of ASC 606 totaled $0.3 million, which was charged to accrued revenue or deferred revenue with a corresponding credit to accumulated deficit, for all contracts not completed as of the adoption date. The comparative information has not been restated.  As a result of adopting ASC 606, we recognized $0.9 and $1.1 million of additional revenue in Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively.

The Company recognizes contract liabilities as a consequence these royalty rate reductions did not impact previously recognized royalty revenue.

Revenuesdeferred revenue when licensees prepay royalties, or from arrangements involving license fees, up-front payments and milestone payments whichthat have not yet been earned.  Deferred revenue is classified as current or noncurrent depending on when it is anticipated to be recognized.  The Company recognizes contract assets as accrued revenue when minimum guaranteed royalties are received or billable by us in connection with other rights and servicesrecognized that represent our continuing obligations, are

36


deferred and recognized in accordance withhave not yet been earned under the license agreement. Deferred revenues also represent minimum licenseeagreements.  Accrued revenue royalties paid in advance of the culmination of the earnings process, the majority of which are non‑refundable to the licensee. Deferred revenues will be recognizedis classified as revenue in future periods in accordance with the license agreement.

Franchise revenues include royalties and franchise fees. Royalties from franchisees are basedcurrent or noncurrent depending on a percentage of net sales of the franchisee and are recognized as earned. Initial franchise fees are recorded as deferred revenue when received and are recognized as revenue when a franchised location commences operations, as all material services and conditions related to the franchise fee have been substantially performed upon the location opening. Renewal franchise fees are recognized as revenue when the franchise agreementsasset is anticipated to be charged to revenue.  Our performance obligations are signedto maintain our licensed intellectual property, and the fee is paid, since there are no material servicesin some cases, to provide product development and conditions related to these franchise renewal fees.design services.

In order to ensure that our licensees and franchisees are appropriately reporting and calculating royalties owed to us, all of ourOur license and franchise agreements include audit rights to allow us to validate the amount of the royalties paid.received.  Differences between amounts initially recognized and amounts subsequently audited or reported as an adjustment to the amounts due from licensees or franchisees isdetermined under audit are recognized in the reporting period in whichwhen the differences become known and are determined to beconsidered collectible.

We are responsible for the enforcement ofregularly enforce our intellectual property rights and for pursuingpursue third parties that are utilizing our assetstrademarks without a license.  As a result ofRoyalties generated from these activities, from time to time, we may recognize royalty revenues that relate to infringements that occurred in prior periods. These royalty recoveries may cause revenues to be higher than expected during a particular reporting periodenforcement proceedings are recognized when they are determined and may not occur in subsequent periods.

considered collectible.  We consider revenue recognition to be a critical accounting policy because of the significance of revenues to our operating results.

31


Table of Contents

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

We hold various trademarks that are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and similar government agencies in a number of other countries.  Acquired trademarks are either capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, or classified as an indefinite-lived asset and not amortized if no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors limit their useful lives.  We routinely evaluate the recognition policyremaining useful life of trademarks that are not being amortized to determine whether events or criteria werecircumstances continue to changesupport an indefinite useful life.  Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired in business combinations and is not amortized.  Indefinite lived trademarks and goodwill are evaluated annually in our fourth quarter for impairment or when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment, and an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount or the reporting unit’s book value exceeds its fair value.  We estimate the fair values of our indefinite-lived trademarks, in part, based on discounted cash flow models that include assumptions determined by us regarding projected revenues, operating costs and discount rates.  Our expectations regarding license agreement renewals are also considered, along with forecasts of revenues from replacement licensees for those that have terminated. 

We restructured our operations in Fiscal 2019 to improve our organizational efficiencies, and we no longer evaluate financial information and business activities of the business acquired in the Hi-Tec Acquisition on a standalone basis.  Consequently, our operations now comprise one reportable segment, which consists of a single operating segment and reporting unit. Because we only have one reporting unit, our goodwill impairment test is based primarily on the relationship between our market capitalization and the book value of our equity adjusted for an estimated control premium and other factors that may indicate our market capitalization does not represent fair value. The annual goodwill impairment test at the end of Fiscal 2020 indicated that the Company’s goodwill was impaired, and an impairment charge of $4.1 million was recorded to reduce goodwill to its estimated fair value.  

Our revenues from our Hi-Tec, Magnum and Interceptor brands were significantly below previous forecasts for the third quarter of Fiscal 2020.  This was identified as an interim impairment indicator for the related indefinite lived trademarks during the preparation of our interim financial statements, and we performed an interim impairment test based on updated cash flow projections and discounted cash flows based on estimated weighted average costs of capital (income approach).  We determined that the fair values of its Hi-Tec and Magnum trademarks were not in excess of their carrying values, and as a result, an interim impairment charge of $5.0 million was recorded during the third quarter to adjust these trademarks to their estimated fair values.  The fair value of the Company’s Interceptor brand was in excess of its $2.1 million carrying value, so no impairment charge was necessary based on the interim test.  However, the Company believes that increased tariffs and global trade wars have negatively impacted the competitive and economic environment in which Interceptor operates, and an indefinite life is no longer supported.  Accordingly, the Interceptor trademark is now being amortized over its estimated remaining useful life.  During the fourth quarter, we completed our evaluation of key inputs used to estimate the fair value of our indefinite lived trademarks and determined that the interim impairment charge was appropriate.

The discounted cash flow model used in determining the fair values of our indefinite-lived trademarks requires extensive use of accounting judgment and financial estimates.  Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist, and therefore our trademarks could be further impaired.  The valuation of our trademarks is affected by, among other things, our business plan for the future it could have a material impact on ourand estimated results of future operations. Changes in the business plan, operating results, or application of alternative assumptions that are different than the estimates used to develop the valuations of the assets may materially impact their valuation.  The assumptions we use to estimate fair value of our indefinite lived intangibles and goodwill may change materially as we re-evaluate them in light of the COVID-19 global pandemic when we complete the accounting for our first quarter financial results for the three months ending May 2, 2020 or in future periods.  These new assumptions may indicate the need for future impairment charges if revenues are projected at that point to be significantly below current forecasts and/or if our market capitalization remains low.

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.  Under this method, deferredDeferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income induring the period that includes the enactment date.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.  In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considerswe consider estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.  We consider this to be a critical accounting policy because when we establish or reducerecord the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, our provision foreffect of equity issuances within the income taxes will increase or decrease, which could have a material impact on our results of operations.

statement.  We account for uncertainty in

32


Table of Contents

income taxes recognized in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for thebased on financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax positionpositions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.  It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. A tax position is to be initially recognized in the consolidatedour financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities.  Such tax positions are to be initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimatefinal settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.

Impairment of Long‑Lived Assets

We evaluate  When we establish or reduce the recoverability of our identifiable intangiblevaluation allowance against deferred tax assets, and other long‑lived assets in accordance with authoritative guidance, which generally requires management to evaluatewhen our uncertain tax positions are resolved or our judgment about these assetstax positions change, our provision for recoverability when eventsincome taxes will increase or circumstances indicate a potential impairment. This evaluation is based on various analyses, including cash flow and profitability projections. These analyses involve management judgment based on various estimates and assumptions. We consider this to be a critical accounting policy because if these estimates or related assumptions change

37


in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for the related assets,decrease, which could have a material impact on our results of operations. To date, there has been no impairment of intangible assetsfinancial position or other long‑lived assets.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Assets

We test goodwill and indefinite-lived assets annually for impairment or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. This determination is made at the reporting unit level which may be either an operating segment or one level below an operating segment if discrete financial information is available. Two or more reporting units within an operating segment may be aggregated for impairment testing if they have similar economic characteristics. In accordance with authoritative guidance, the Company may first assess qualitative factors relevant in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting units are less than their carrying amounts. Based on this analysis, the Company may determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. If it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the amount of any impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit is determined using two steps. First, the Company determines the fair value of the reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires unobservable inputs (Level 3) within the fair value hierarchy. These inputs include selection of an appropriate discount rate and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. Second, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill and other intangibles over the implied fair value. The implied fair value is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with authoritative guidance.  These analyses involve management judgment based on various estimates and assumptions. We consider this to be a critical accounting policy because if these estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for the related assets, which could have a material impact on our results of operations. To date, there has been no impairment of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets.

Valuation of Assets and Liabilities in Connection with Business Combinations

We have acquired material intangible assets in connection with business combinations. These intangible assets consist primarily of brands and distributor relationships.  Discounted cash flow models are typically used to determine the fair values of these intangible assets for purposes of allocating consideration paid to the net assets acquired in a business combination. These models require the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, estimating the timing of and future net cash flows from intangible asset groupings and developing appropriate discount rates to calculate the present value of cash flows.

Significant estimates and assumptions are also required to determine the acquisition date fair values of certain tangible assets such as inventory.  We believe the fair values used to record intangible assets acquired and other tangible assets acquired in connection with business combinations are based upon reasonable estimates and assumptions given the facts and circumstances as of the related valuation dates.

Contingencies and Litigation

We evaluate contingent liabilities, including threatened or pending litigation, in accordance with authoritative guidance and record estimated reserves when the outcome of these matters is deemed probable and the liability is reasonably estimable. Management makes these assessments based on estimates about the facts and circumstances as they evolve, and in some instances based in part on the advice of outside legal counsel.

Stock‑Based Compensation

We account for equity awards in accordance with authoritative guidance, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock‑based awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values.

38


The fair value of stock options and other stock‑based awards is estimated using option valuation models. These models require the input of subjective assumptions, including expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend rate, estimated life and estimated forfeitures of each award. The fair value of stock‑based awards is amortized over the vesting period of the award, and we have elected to use the graded amortization method. We make quarterly assessments of the adequacy of the tax credit pool to determine if there are any deficiencies that require recognition in the consolidated statements of operations. We consider this to be a critical accounting policy because if any of the estimates described above require significant changes, these changes could result in fluctuating expenses that could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Recent Accounting PronouncementPronouncements

See Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.

Results of Operations

The table below sets forth certain of our consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in the current period or in future periods.  Our results of operations include the transactions for Hi-Tec from December 7, 2016 through January 28, 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 28,

 

January 30,

 

January 31,

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Royalty revenues

 

$

34,022

 

$

34,654

 

$

34,968

 

Indirect product sales

 

 

6,599

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Total revenues

 

 

40,621

 

 

34,654

 

 

34,968

 

Costs of goods sold

 

 

5,083

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Gross profit

 

 

35,538

 

 

34,654

 

 

34,968

 

Selling, general and, administrative expenses and amortization of intangible assets

 

 

35,155

 

 

21,338

 

 

19,580

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

3,782

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(3,399)

 

 

13,316

 

 

15,388

 

Interest expense and other expense, net

 

 

(1,270)

 

 

(525)

 

 

(854)

 

Income tax provision

 

 

3,258

 

 

4,358

 

 

4,714

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,927)

 

$

8,433

 

$

9,820

 

Revenues

Our royalty revenues totaled $34.0 million, $34.7 million and $35.0 million in Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. Royalty revenues for all periods were primarily generated from licensing our trademarks to retailers and, to a lesser extent, to wholesalers, our share of licensing revenues from brand representation licensing agreements with other brand owners and, beginning in the third quarters of Fiscal 2016, franchise fees and royalty revenues received from franchisees of our Flip Flop Shops brand and, beginning in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017, revenues from royalties on wholesale sales of products bearing our Hi-Tec family of footwear brands throughout the world.

The change in royalty revenues between Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 was principally due to a decrease in North American royalties as we transition from Target to our new wholesale licensing partners for sales of Cherokee branded products in the United States. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in royalties from our licensees in South America, India, the Middle East, South Africa and Asia as the demand for Cherokee-branded and other products grew in these regions, as well as increased Flip Flop Shops franchise revenues due to our receipt of a full year of these revenues in Fiscal 2017 as compared to a partial quarter of these revenues in Fiscal 2016 (as we acquired the Flip Flop Shops

39


brand in October 2015).  Additionally, we had $1.2 million additional royalty revenues from wholesale sales of Hi-Tec, Magnum and Interceptor branded products as a result of the Hi-Tec acquisition during December 2016.

As of January 28, 2017, we had contractual rights to receive over $108.8 million forward‑facing minimum royalty revenues over the next six years, excluding any revenues that may be guaranteed in connection with contract renewals.

Pursuant to our typical arrangements with our licensees and franchisees, we receive quarterly royalty statements and periodic retail information about sales of products that generate royalties to us, including, for our licensees, products bearing the brands we own or represent, and for our franchisees, products sold at each franchise location. However, our licensees and franchisees are generally not required to provide, and typically do not provide, information that would enable us to determine the specific reasons for period‑to‑period fluctuations in retail sales. Because we do not have direct oversight over our licensees and franchisees, we may not have all the information necessary to assess the impact on our operations of changes in price, volume or amount of products sold or the introduction of new products, or to otherwise determine or predict the specific reasons why revenue may increase or decrease in any given period.

In connection with the Hi-Tec acquisition, we began selling footwear directly to wholesalers throughout varies European countries as well as directly to various government entities around the world. The results of these operations are included as indirect product sales in the table above.

Royalty Revenues By Brand

The following table sets forth our royalty revenues by brand for Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2017

 

Fiscal 2016

 

(amounts in thousands, except percentages)

 

Royalty

    

% of Total

    

Royalty

    

% of Total

 

Royalty Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Cherokee Brand Royalty Revenues

 

$

22,994

 

68

%  

$

25,643

 

74

%

Hawk Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

5,055

 

15

%  

 

4,977

 

14

%

Liz Lange Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

2,382

 

 7

%  

 

2,663

 

 8

%

Flip Flop Shops Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

1,601

 

 5

%  

 

459

 

 1

%

Hi-Tec  and Magnum Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

1,224

 

 4

%  

 

 —

 

 —

%

All Other Brand Revenues

 

 

766

 

 2

%  

 

912

 

 3

%

Total Royalty Revenues

 

$

34,022

 

100

%  

$

34,654

 

100

%

Cherokee Brand Royalty Revenues

Our Cherokee brand accounted for approximately 68%, 74% and 76% of our aggregate royalty revenues in Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. Total worldwide retail sales of merchandise bearing the Cherokee brand totaled $88.0 million, $368.0 million and $381.0 million in the fourth quarters of Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. For Fiscal 2017, total worldwide retail sales of merchandise bearing the Cherokee brand totaled approximately $766 million, compared to $1.3 billion in total retail sales for Fiscal 2016 and $1.4 billion in total retail sales for Fiscal 2015.

During Fiscal 2017, we entered into nine new wholesale licensing arrangements covering sales of products bearing our Cherokee brand in the United States, which became operational at the beginning of Fiscal 2018. We believe these arrangements signal a significant shift in our strategy for sales of products bearing the Cherokee brand in the United States, which in the past have been governed by our DTR license agreement with Target. These new wholesale arrangements consist of multiple license agreements with nine different distributors that include higher royalty rates but lower minimum annual royalty obligations, as compared to one license agreement with one retailer, Target, that included a lower and declining, tiered royalty rate but a higher minimum annual royalty obligation. This shift to a wholesale licensing model for sales of Cherokee branded products in the United States exposes us to a number of risks. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for additional information.

40


Under our former license agreement with Target for sales of Cherokee branded products in the United States, we agreed to certain royalty rate reductions for sales of most products covered by the agreement, which applied to future sales during a fiscal year after Target achieved certain sales volume thresholds. Historically, this has caused the Company to record its highest revenues and profits in its first quarter and its lowest revenues and profits in its fourth quarter. However, we do not anticipate this trend to continue in Fiscal 2018 and in future fiscal years due to the expiration of the Target license agreement at the end of Fiscal 2017. As a result, as of the beginning of Fiscal 2018, we are no longer subject to royalty rate reductions over the course of the year for sales of our Cherokee branded products in the United States, as our new wholesale license agreements covering these products include a fixed royalty rate that is consistent throughout the year. Because U.S. wholesalers and retailers typically record their highest sales in the fourth quarter for the holiday season, we anticipate that our performance in future periods could be more strongly influenced by this seasonality of the retail business and potentially subject to more material fluctuations between periods. However, because we have less experience with the wholesale licensing model than the DTR licensing model, our forecasts and expectations regarding revenues from these arrangements may not be reliable. Any continuation of the Company’s historical revenue and profit patterns or development of any new revenue or profit patterns will depend on, among other things, the terms of the Company’s existing license and franchise agreements, excluding the Target license agreement, the terms of any new license or franchise agreements, and retail sales volumes achieved by the Company’s licensees and franchisees.

Hi-Tec and Magnum Brands Royalty Revenue

In December 2016, we completed the Hi-Tec Acquisition, in which we acquired the intellectual property assets of Hi-Tec, including the Hi-Tec, Magnum and Interceptor brands and related trademarks. In connection with the Hi-Tec Acquisition, we also entered into wholesale license agreements with certain of Hi-Tec’s operating partners and/or distributors. Under the license agreements, the operating partners and/or distributors have licensed certain Hi-Tec trademarks in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, continental Europe, South Africa and other jurisdictions in Africa.These arrangements are structured similarly to our other wholesale licensing arrangements.

In light of the recent date of this acquisition, we are not able to reliably forecast or predict the impact of these brands on our revenues or other aspects of our results of operations. Our integration of these assets into our business, including transitioning them from a full spectrum distribution model to our brand licensing model, amplifies this uncertainty.

Flip Flop Shops

Franchisees of Flip Flop Shops retail stores in the United States enter into franchise agreements with us that typically have a 10-year initial term and require payment to us of an initial franchise fee and a royalty fee. Franchisees of Flip Flop Shops retail stores outside the United States may enter into master franchise agreements with us for multiple store locations within a specified territory. In these instances, the master franchisee typically pays us an initial master franchisee fee, a per-location opening fee (the amount of which varies for each master franchise) and a royalty fee.

We anticipate that our Flip Flop Shops brand contribution as a percentage of total revenues will increase in future periods as additional stores open. We anticipate revenues will fluctuate depending upon the number of new stores opened in any given period, as well as royalty fluctuations based on seasonal demand, brand offerings, promotions and the number of existing stores open.

41


Geographic Revenues

The following table sets forth our geographic licensing revenues for Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2017

 

Fiscal 2016

 

(amounts in thousands, except percentages)

 

Royalty

 

% of Total

    

Royalty

 

% of Total

 

Geographic Royalty Revenue

 

Revenue

    

Revenue

 

Revenue

    

Revenue

 

U.S. and Canada

 

$

22,638

 

67

%  

$

24,615

 

71

%

Asia

 

 

4,457

 

13

%  

 

3,792

 

11

%

Latin America

 

 

2,820

 

 8

%  

 

2,643

 

 8

%  

Africa

 

 

1,399

 

 4

%  

 

1,023

 

 3

%  

United Kingdom and Europe

 

 

837

 

 3

%  

 

837

 

 2

%

All others

 

 

1,871

 

 5

%  

 

1,744

 

 5

%

Total Royalty Revenues

 

$

34,022

 

100

%  

$

34,654

 

100

%

United States and Canada

Our largest licensees in the United States in all periods presented were Target and Kohl’s, which together contributed 47% and 57% of our total revenues for Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, respectively, and 28% and 46% of our total revenues for the fourth quarters of Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, respectively.

Target.For all periods presented, Target had the exclusive rights to sell Cherokee branded products for all product categories in the United States. Retail sales of Cherokee branded products at Target in the United States were lower during Fiscal 2017 at approximately $509.0 million, down from approximately $1.1 billion in each of Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015. Under our former license agreement with Target, Target paid us royalties based on a percentage of its sales of Cherokee branded products and a royalty rate that, for most product categories, reduced after Target achieved specified cumulative sales volume thresholds during each fiscal year. Target also paid fixed royalty rates for Target’s sales of Cherokee branded products in the adult merchandise category that were made by Target through its website (target.com) and sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category. In addition, under a separate license agreement with us, Target pays a fixed percentage of net sales of products bearing the Liz Lange brand in the United States.

Under the terms of our former license agreement with Target for the Cherokee brand, Target was obligated to pay us a minimum annual royalty of $10.5 million, which applied to all sales of Cherokee branded products made by Target in the United States other than sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category (which products were subject to a separate minimum annual royalty payment of $0.8 million).

Our license agreement with Target for most Cherokee branded products expired on January 31, 2017. Our license agreement with Target covering sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category will expire at the end of its current term on January 31, 2018, and will continue to generate revenues to Cherokee Global Brands until its expiration. Target has informed us that it has elected to not renew the Liz Lange license agreement, which expires on January 31, 2018 at the end of the current term, Target will continue to pay royalties to Cherokee Global Brands until the expiration of the agreement.  Cherokee Global Brands has entered into a master license agreement with a third party for Liz Lange branded maternity products beginning in Fiscal 2019. Our ability to generate royalty revenues from other licensees and franchisees sufficient to replace Target’s historical royalty payments to us is yet to be determined and we may experience decreased revenue levels as a result of the expiration of this relationship, particularly in the near term as our wholesale arrangements intended to replace our license agreement with Target for the Cherokee brand begin to gain traction with new retailers and their consumer bases.

Royalty revenues from our Cherokee brand at Target, excluding sales of Cherokee branded products in Canada (through Target’s discontinuation of operations in Canada) and Cherokee branded products sold in the school uniforms category, were $10.5 million and $14.9 million in Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, respectively, which accounted for 31% and 43% of our total revenues for the respective periods.  The decrease in royalties between Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017 and between the fourth quarters of each such fiscal year was due to a decline in retail sales of Cherokee branded products

42


as a result of the expiration of the Target license agreement at the end of Fiscal 2017, as Target began to transition away from sales of these products as the expiration of this license agreement approached.

Kohl’s.  As of the end of Fiscal 2017, Kohl’s had approximately 1,100 stores in the United States. Retail sales of Hawk Signature or Tony Hawk branded products at Kohl’s totaled $64.6 million in Fiscal 2017, compared to $90.6 million in Fiscal 2016. Under our license agreement with Kohl’s, Kohl’s pays royalty revenues to us based on a percentage of its sales of Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk branded products. The minimum annual royalty payment applicable to our license agreement, as amended, with Kohl’s for the Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk brands was $4.8 million prior to January 28, 2017 and $4.6 million for the remainder of the term, which applies to all sales of Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk branded products in the United States.

We entered into three additional license agreements (two during Fiscal 2017 and one during Fiscal 2018) for our Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk brands.  The license agreements are for broad distribution of the brands in the United States for all retail, including specialty, mid-tier, regional, mass market, off-price and club retail.

Because retail sales did not exceed the contractual minimum guarantees in any of the periods presented, royalty revenues from our Hawk Signature brand at Kohl’s remained flat at $4.8 million for all periods, which accounted for 14% of our total revenues for each of the respective periods.

International Licensees

Most of our international licensees are required to pay the royalty revenues owed to us in U.S. dollars. As a consequence, any weakening of the U.S. dollar benefits us in that the total royalty revenues reported from our international licensees increases when the dollar weakens against applicable foreign currencies. Conversely, any strengthening of the U.S. dollar against an international licensee’s foreign currency results in lower royalty revenues from such licensee. The main foreign currencies we encounter in our operations are the Mexican Peso, the EURO, the Great British Pound, the South African Rand, the Japanese Yen, the Chinese Yuan, and the Canadian Dollar. We do not currently engage in currency hedging activities to limit the risk of exchange rate fluctuations.

As the U.S. dollar remained relatively stable between Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017, the estimated cumulative effect on our revenues of changes to applicable foreign currency exchange rates during Fiscal 2017 as compared to Fiscal 2016 was immaterial.

Additionally, we generally record the sales of our international licensees and franchisees in U.S. dollars. We typically receive a schedule of retail sales on a monthly and/or quarterly basis from each of our foreign licensees and franchisees that is denominated in their applicable foreign currency, and then we convert these amounts to U.S. dollars using the appropriate exchange rate for the purpose of disclosing all retail sales in U.S. dollars. For all periods, we do not consider the period‑to‑period fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates to have had a significant effect on the accuracy of the U.S. dollar‑denominated figures presented in this Annual Report.

Asia and Latin America. Our royalty revenues from Asia and Latin America are generated from licensees in Japan, China, Mexico, Peru, Chile, India, and other territories. Royalty revenues from licensees in Asia and Latin America increased to $7.3 million in Fiscal 2017 from $6.4 million in Fiscal 2016, representing a 13.1% increase. This increase was principally due to increased revenues from Japanese licensees in Fiscal 2017. In local currencies, most of our licensees in Asia and Latin America experienced growth in retail sales across all periods presented.

United Kingdom, Europe and Others.  Our other international royalty revenues are generated from licensees in the United Kingdom, other countries in Europe and other territories. One of our more significant European licensees is Argos, a subsidiary of Home Retail Group plc, which launched a broad assortment of Cherokee lifestyle products online, in catalogs and in more than 750 Argos stores across the United Kingdom and Ireland in late July 2015 and began generating royalties to us during the third quarter of Fiscal 2016. Royalty revenues from licensees in Europe and other territories were relatively consistent at $2.7 million in Fiscal 2017 compared to $2.6 million in Fiscal 2016.

43


Indirect Product Sales Revenues

In addition, since the Hi-Tec Acquisition, we have been indirectly selling products bearing the Hi-Tec family of footwear brands to certain select wholesalers and government entities. In these arrangements, the purchasers of the products place their product orders directly with us, which we then forward to a manufacturer or distributor for the manufacture and delivery of the products directly to the original purchaser. The wholesalers and government entities that purchase products under these arrangements submit payments directly to us for their product orders, and we then remit a portion of these payments representing the product cost to the manufacturer or distributor of the purchased products. We began recording revenues from these relationships in December 2016 when we acquired these brands, and in Fiscal 2017, we recorded a total of $6.6 million in revenues from these indirect product sales. We maintain these indirect product sale relationships with a minimal portion of the customers of the Hi-Tec family of footwear brands. The indirect product sale arrangements subject us to certain risks, see item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for additional information.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold during Fiscal 2017 relates to payments remitted to manufacturers or distributors of purchased products that are sold to wholesalers and government entities as described earlier.

Selling, General and Administrative

The following table sets forth additional detail regarding the components for selling, general and administrative expenses for Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

January 28, 2017

 

January 30, 2016

 

Personnel expenses (including salaries, taxes, benefits, consultants and bonus)

 

$

10,657

 

$

9,611

 

Corporate expenses

 

 

5,999

 

 

4,588

 

Transaction costs/U.S. Business development/IP Protection Costs

 

 

11,498

 

 

1,234

 

Marketing expenses

 

 

2,299

 

 

1,558

 

Product development expenses

 

 

839

 

 

796

 

Non cash stock compensation

 

 

2,380

 

 

2,222

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,483

 

 

1,329

 

Total selling, general, administrative and amortization expenses

 

$

35,155

 

$

21,338

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses, including amortization of intangible assets, were $35.2 million for Fiscal 2017, compared to $21.3 million for Fiscal 2016, representing an increase of $13.8 million. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to the $11.5 million of additional legal, due diligence costs, integration and other costs related to the Hi-Tec acquisition and increased business development costs related to the identification and establishment of new brand licensees in the U.S. Selling, general and administrative expenses also included operating costs for Hi-Tec during the period from December 2016 through January 2017.

Restructure Charges

We also incurred restructuring charges of $3.8 million related to the Hi-Tec Acquisition. Restructuring charges consisted of severance, contract termination and other restructuring-related costs. Contract termination costs consist primarily of costs that will continue to be incurred under operating leases for their remaining terms without economic benefit to the Company, offset by any sublease income to be received thereafter.

Interest and Other Income or Expense

Our interest income and other income for Fiscal 2017 was $0.4 million, compared to $0.2 million for Fiscal 2016. Our interest expense for Fiscal 2017 was $1.7 million, compared to $0.7 million for Fiscal 2016.

44


Tax Provision

For Fiscal 2017, we recorded a tax provision of $3.3 million, compared to $4.4 million for Fiscal 2016. Our effective tax rate was −69.8% for Fiscal 2017 and 34.1% for Fiscal 2016. The difference in the effective tax rate for Fiscal 2017 in comparison to Fiscal 2016 was primarily due to nondeductible transaction costs related to the Hi-Tec Acquisition.  Since the transaction costs exceeded the Fiscal 2017 pretax book loss, the result was a significant fluctuation in the Fiscal 2017 effective tax rate.  In addition, the Fiscal 2016 effective tax rate included a benefit for recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits upon the conclusion of certain income tax examinations.

Net (Loss) Income

Our net loss for Fiscal 2017 was $7.9 million, or $0.84 per diluted share, compared to a net income of $8.4 million, or $0.95 per diluted share, for Fiscal 2016.  Our loss was primarily driven by acquisition costs and restructure charges incurred in connection with the Hi-Tec acquisition.

Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015

Revenues

In Fiscal 2016, our revenues totaled $34.7 million, compared to $35.0 million in Fiscal 2015. Revenues for Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 were primarily generated from licensing our trademarks to retailers and, to a lesser extent, to wholesalers, our share of licensing revenues from brand representation licensing agreements with other brand owners and, in the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2016, franchise fees and royalty revenues received from franchisees of our Flip Flop Shops brand. The decrease in revenues was primarily related to the closing of Target Canada and the transition from Tesco to Argos, in addition to the effect of foreign exchange rates on international royalties.  This decrease was partially offset by revenues from the October 2015 acquisition of Flip Flop Shops.

Our Cherokee brand accounted for approximately 74% and 76% of our aggregate royalty revenues in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. Total worldwide retail sales of merchandise bearing the Cherokee brand totaled $368.0 million and $381.0 million in the fourth quarters of Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. For Fiscal 2016, total worldwide retail sales of merchandise bearing the Cherokee brand totaled approximately $1.3 billion, versus $1.4 billion in total retail sales reported for Fiscal 2015.

Revenues By Brand

The following table sets forth our revenues by brand for Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2016

 

Fiscal 2015

 

(dollar amounts in thousands)

 

Royalty

    

% of Total

    

Royalty

    

% of Total

 

Royalty Revenue

 

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

 

Cherokee Brand Royalty Revenues

 

$

25,643

 

74

%  

$

26,506

 

76

%

Hawk Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

4,977

 

14

%  

 

4,946

 

14

%

Liz Lange Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

2,663

 

 8

%  

 

2,767

 

 8

%

Flip Flop Shops Brand Royalty Revenues

 

 

459

 

 1

%  

 

 —

 

 —

 

All Other Brand Revenues

 

 

912

 

 3

%  

 

749

 

 2

%

Total Royalty Revenue

 

$

34,654

 

100

%  

$

34,968

 

100

%

45


Geographic Revenues

The following table sets forth our geographic licensing revenues for Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2016

 

Fiscal 2015

 

(amounts in thousands, except percentages)

 

Royalty

    

% of Total

    

Royalty

    

% of Total

 

Geographic Royalty Revenue

 

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

    

Revenue

 

U.S. and Canada

 

$

24,615

 

71

%  

$

24,397

 

70

%  

Latin America

 

 

2,643

 

 8

%  

 

3,057

 

 9

%  

United Kingdom and Europe

 

 

837

 

 2

%  

 

1,636

 

 5

%  

Asia

 

 

3,792

 

11

%  

 

3,564

 

10

%  

All others

 

 

2,767

 

 8

%  

 

2,314

 

 6

%  

Total Royalty Revenues

 

$

34,654

 

100

%  

$

34,968

 

100

%  

U.S. and Canada

Our largest licensees in the U.S. generally are Target and Kohl’s, which together contributed 46% and 57% of our consolidated revenues for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 and for Fiscal 2016, respectively. In Canada, we are transitioning from Target Canada to Sears Canada for our Cherokee and Liz Lange brands.

Target. As of the end of Fiscal 2016 Target had approximately 1,790 stores in the United States. Retail sales of Cherokee branded products at Target in the U.S. were flat in Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, at approximately $1.1 billion. In Fiscal 2016, Target reached the minimum annual royalty payment of $10.5 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2016.

Royalty revenues from our Cherokee brand at Target U.S., excluding sales of Cherokee branded products in Canada and Cherokee branded products sold in the school uniforms category, were $14.9 million in Fiscal 2016 and $15.0 million in Fiscal 2015, which accounted for 43%, and 43%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues during such periods.

Target’s U.S. retail sales of Cherokee branded products during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 totaled $296.8 million, compared to $314.1 million for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015, decreasing by approximately 5.5%. Royalty revenues from our Cherokee brand at Target U.S. were $2.4 million for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 and $2.5 million for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015, decreasing by approximately 2%. The revenues decreased slightly between periods due to a decline in retail sales for the quarter.

Kohl’s.  As of the end of Fiscal 2016 Kohl’s had approximately 1,200 stores in the United States. Retail sales of Hawk Signature or Tony Hawk branded products at Kohl’s totaled $90.6 million in the Fiscal 2016 compared to $119.6 million in Fiscal 2015, decreasing approximately 24.2%.  Because retail sales did not exceed the contractual minimum guarantees, royalty revenues from our Hawk Signature and Tony Hawk brands at Kohl’s remained flat between periods at $1.2 million and $4.8 million in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2016 respectively, which accounted for 15% and 14% of our consolidated revenues for such periods, respectively.

Latin America, Asia and Others

Other international royalty revenues in Fiscal 2016 increased to $9.4 million from $8.9 million in Fiscal 2015, representing a 4.8% increase. This total includes licensees in Japan, China, Mexico, South Africa, Peru, Israel, Chile, India and other territories. The increase was principally due to strength in Japan, China, India and South Africa, offset by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. In local currencies, the majority of our international licensees had growth in retail sales for Fiscal 2016. As the U.S. dollar strengthened between periods, the estimated cumulative effect on our revenues of changes to applicable foreign currency exchange rates during Fiscal 2016 in comparison to Fiscal 2015 was an approximate $0.8 million decrease.

46


Selling, General and Administrative

The following table sets forth additional detail regarding the components for selling, general and administrative expenses for Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 30,

 

January 31,

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Personnel expenses (including salaries, taxes, benefits, consultants and bonus)

 

$

9,611

 

$

10,401

 

Corporate expenses

 

 

4,588

 

 

3,997

 

Transaction costs/U.S. Business development/IP Protection Costs

 

 

1,234

 

 

 —

 

Marketing expenses

 

 

1,558

 

 

1,618

 

Product development expenses

 

 

796

 

 

886

 

Non cash stock compensation

 

 

2,222

 

 

1,175

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,329

 

 

1,503

 

Total selling, general, administrative and amortization expenses

 

$

21,338

 

$

19,580

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses, including amortization of intangible assets, were $21.3 million for Fiscal 2016, compared to $19.6 million for Fiscal 2015, representing an increase of $1.7 million. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to additional legal and due diligence costs related to potential and completed acquisitions, an increase in stock-based compensation, increased business development costs related to the identification and establishment of new brand licensees in the U.S. and the costs associated with Flip Flop Shops.

Interest and Other Income or Expense

Our interest income for Fiscal 2016 was $0 million, compared to $0 million for Fiscal 2015. Our interest expense for Fiscal 2016 was $0.7 million, compared to $0.8 million for Fiscal 2015.

Tax Provision

For Fiscal 2016, we recorded a tax provision of $4.4 million, compared to $4.7 million for Fiscal 2015. Our effective tax rate was 34.1% for Fiscal 2016 and 32.4% for Fiscal 2015. The difference in the effective tax rate for Fiscal 2016 in comparison to Fiscal 2015 was primarily due to the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits upon the conclusion during Fiscal 2016 of certain income tax examinations.

Net Income

Our net income for Fiscal 2016 was $8.4 million, or $0.95 per diluted share, compared to a net income of $9.8 million, or $1.15 per diluted share, for Fiscal 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

On January 28, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.4 million. On January 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $6.5 million. On January 31, 2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of $7.6 million. During Fiscal 2017, cash provided by operations was $12.1 million, compared to $11.9 million in Fiscal 2016.

During Fiscal 2017, cash used in investing activities was $73.8 million, compared to $13.4 million in Fiscal 2016. In Fiscal 2017, cash used by investing activities consisted of capital expenditures of property and equipment and trademark registration and renewal costs, as well as acquisitions of intangible assets relating to Hi-Tec. In Fiscal 2016, cash used by investing activities consisted of capital expenditures of property and equipment and trademark registration and renewal costs, as well as acquisitions of intangible assets relating to Everyday California and Flip Flop Shops.

47


During Fiscal 2016, cash used by investing activities was $13.4 million, compared to $0.6 million in Fiscal 2015. In Fiscal 2016, cash used by investing activities consisted of capital expenditures of property and equipment and trademark registration and renewal costs, as well as acquisitions of intangible assets relating to Everyday California and Flip Flop Shops. In Fiscal 2015, cash used by investing activities consisted of capital expenditures on property and equipment and trademark registration and renewal costs.

During Fiscal 2017, cash received from financing activities was $63.5 million, compared to cash received in financing activities of $0.5 million in Fiscal 2016. We had borrowings of $45 million, from a new credit facility with Cerebrus and $5 million from an unsecured receivables funding loan from Jess Ravich, the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors incurred in connection with the Hi-Tec acquisition, and loan payments of $25 million in Fiscal 2017, compared to loan payments of $7.6 million in Fiscal 2016. Also in connection with the Hi-Tec acquisition, in Fiscal 2017, we had net proceeds of $37 million from a public offering.

During Fiscal 2016, cash received from financing activities was $0.5 million, compared to cash used in financing activities of $5.8 million in Fiscal 2015. We had borrowings of $6.0 million, from a new term loan under our amended JP Morgan credit agreement for the Flip Flop Shops acquisition, and loan payments of $7.6 million in Fiscal 2016, compared to loan payments of $7.0 million in Fiscal 2015. Proceeds from exercises of stock options were $1.9 million in both Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015. During Fiscal 2016, we paid a total of $0 million in dividends, compared to $0.8 million in dividends paid in Fiscal 2015.

Credit Facilities

In September 2012, we entered into a credit facility with JPMorgan. The terms of the JPMorgan credit facility included various restrictions and covenants regarding the operation of our business and financial covenants that set financial standards we must maintain. As collateral for the JPMorgan credit facility, we granted a security interest in favor of JPMorgan in all of our assets (including trademarks), and our indebtedness was guaranteed by our wholly owned subsidiaries. See Note 10 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional information about our JPMorgan credit facility. As described below, as of the date of this report, all amounts owed under the JPMorgan credit facility have been repaid and the credit agreement, together with all term notes and the revolving line of credit thereunder, have been terminated and cancelled.

On December 7, 2016, we entered into a senior secured credit facility with Cerberus, pursuant to which we are permitted to borrow (i) up to $5.0 million under a revolving credit facility, and (ii) up to $45.0 million under a term loan facility. Also on December 7, 2016, we drew down $45.0 million under the Cerberus term loan facility and have used a portion of such borrowings to fund the Hi-Tec Acquisition, including the repayment of the outstanding indebtedness of Hi-Tec, and to repay all amounts owed under our JPMorgan credit facility. We expect to use the remaining amount of borrowings under the Cerberus credit facility for general working capital. Our borrowings under the Cerberus credit facility are subject to certain maintenance and other fees. The terms of the Cerberus credit facility include financial covenants that set financial standards we will be required to maintain and operating covenants that impose various restrictions and obligations regarding the operation of our business, including covenants that require us to obtain Cerberus’s consent before we can take certain specified actions. As collateral for the Cerberus credit facility, we granted a first priority security interest in favor of Cerberus in substantially all of our assets (including trademarks), and our indebtedness is guaranteed by our subsidiaries.

Sources of Liquidity

We expect our primary sources of liquidity to be cash flow generated from operations, cash and cash equivalents currently on hand, and up to $5.0 million of funds available to us pursuant to the revolving credit facility with Cerberus. We believe our cash flow from operations, together with our cash and cash equivalents currently on hand and access to funds pursuant to the revolving line of credit, will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditure and other commitments and otherwise support our operations for the next twelve months.

Our license agreement with Target for most Cherokee branded products expired on January 31, 2017. The license agreement with Target, including the existing royalty obligations, remained in effect and continued to generate

48


revenues through the end of Fiscal 2017 until its expiration. Our license agreement with Target covering sales of Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category will expire at the end of its current term on January 31, 2018, and will continue to generate revenues until its expiration. Our ability to generate cash from our other licensees and franchisees in replacement of Target’s royalty payments on a long-term basis is yet to be determined.

During Fiscal 2017, we entered into nine new wholesale licensing arrangements covering sales of products bearing our Cherokee brand in the United States. We anticipate that these wholesale licensing arrangements may generate different trends in our liquidity after they become effective. For example, these wholesale arrangements do not have minimum annual royalty obligations to the magnitude of our license agreement with Target and are not subject to reducing royalty rates throughout the year based upon cumulative sales levels. Thus, as we begin to receive royalty payments from these wholesale licensees and to the extent we pursue similar wholesale arrangements in the future, their lower minimum royalty obligations and consistent royalty rates could cause our cash flows from operating activities to be more strongly influenced by the seasonality of the retail business and thus subject to more material fluctuations between periods and, if retail sales volume for the Cherokee brand decreases and we were to become dependent upon minimum royalty obligations, could also cause our cash flows from operating activities to decline.

We cannot predict our revenues and cash flows that will be generated from operations in future periods, and our revenues and cash flows could be materially lower than we expect. If our revenues and cash flows are lower than we anticipate, or if our expenses are higher than we anticipate, then we may not have sufficient cash available to fund our planned operations and we could fail to comply with the terms of our credit facility with Cerberus or our other contractual commitments. In that case, we may need to take steps to reduce expenditures by scaling back operations and reducing staff related to these activities or seek funds from other sources, which may not be available when needed, on acceptable terms or at all. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, for additional information.

As of January 28, 2017, we were not the guarantor of any material third‑party obligations and we did not have any irrevocable repurchase obligations.

Uses of Liquidity

Our cash requirements over the next twelve months are primarily to fund our operations and working capital, to make payments of principal and interest under our credit facility with Cerberus, at our discretion and subject to the terms of the credit facility, to repurchase shares of our common stock or pay dividends as determined by our board of directors (“Board of Directors”), and, to a lesser extent, to fund capital expenditures.

As of January 28, 2017, we had approximately $44.6 million in principal amount of outstanding indebtedness owed under our credit facility with Cerberus, all of which is due in December 2021. We may seek to refinance all or a portion of this indebtedness before its maturity date. Any such refinancing would depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at the time, which could affect our ability to obtain attractive refinance terms when desired, or at all.

Pursuant to the approval of our Board of Directors, in June 2016 we repurchased and retired 60,082 shares of our common stock in open market transactions at a weighted average purchase price of $12.24 and for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $735,000. Further repurchases of our common stock or the declaration and payment of any future dividends or repurchases of our common stock are subject to limited exceptions, subject to negative covenants contained in our credit facility and, assuming the satisfaction or waiver by Cerberus of such covenants, would be made solely at the discretion of our Board of Directors and would be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, capital expenditures, and other factors that may be deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Additionally, should an established and marketable brand or similar equity property become available on favorable terms, we would consider using our liquidity to fund such an acquisition opportunity, subject to obtaining any consent required under our credit facility with Cerberus.

49


The following table provides information related to our contractual cash obligations under various financial and commercial agreements as of January 28, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period(a)

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Fiscal 2022

    

 

 

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Fiscal 2018

    

Fiscal 2019

    

Fiscal 2020

    

Fiscal 2021

    

and thereafter

    

Total

 

Operating Leases(b)

 

$

2,488

 

$

2,422

 

$

2,351

 

$

2,118

 

$

8,893

 

$

18,272

 

Long-term debt(c)

 

$

5,600

 

$

1,600

 

$

1,600

 

$

1,600

 

$

38,200

 

$

48,600

 

Interest on long-term debt(c)

 

$

4,180

 

$

4,028

 

$

3,876

 

$

3,724

 

$

3,052

 

$

18,860

 

Total Contractual Cash Obligations

 

$

12,268

 

$

8,050

 

$

7,827

 

$

7,442

 

$

50,145

 

$

85,732

 


(a)

For purposes of the above table, yearly periods were calculated to coincide with our fiscal years, meaning, for example, that the period covered by the column captioned “Fiscal 2018” starts on January 29, 2017 and ends on February 3, 2018.

(b)

Represents future minimum non‑cancelable lease payments through the expiration date with respect to the lease of our office and warehouse facilities and other equipment leases.

(c)

Represents future interest (based on current interest rates) and principal payments with respect to our credit facility with Cerberus and our receivables funding loan with Jess Ravich.

Inflation

The rate of inflation over the past several years has not had a material effect on our revenues and profits. Since most of our future revenues will be based upon a percentage of sales by our licensees and franchisees of products bearing our owned or represented trademarks, we do not anticipate that short‑term future inflation will have a material impact, positive or negative, on future financial results.

Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have no off‑balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.operations.

Item 7A. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISK33

Our market risk generally represents the risk that losses may occur in the values of financial instruments as a result of movements in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest

From time to time we invest our excess cash in interest‑bearing temporary investments of high‑quality issuers. Due to the short time the investments are outstanding and their general liquidity, these instruments are classified as cash equivalents in our consolidated balance sheets and do not represent a material interest rate risk to us. In relation to our credit facility with JPMorgan and our credit facility with Cerberus, a 100 basis point increase in the interest rate would have had an immaterial impact on interest expense for Fiscal 2017.

Foreign Currency

We conduct business in various parts of the world. As most of our international licensees are required to pay the royalty revenues owed to us in U.S. dollars, we are exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rates of the foreign currencies in countries in which our licensees do business when they are converted to the U.S. dollar, and significant fluctuations in exchange rates could materially impact our results of operations and cash flows. For Fiscal 2017, revenues from international licensing activities comprised 47% of our total revenues. For Fiscal 2017, a hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currencies of countries where our licensees operate would have negatively affected our revenues by approximately $1.9 million, which represents 4.7% of our total revenues reported for the period. This amount is not considered to represent a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows.

50


Item 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATASTATEMENTS

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page

CHEROKEEAPEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

 

Report of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

52

35

Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 28, 2017February 1, 2020 and January 30, 2016February 2, 2019

53

36

Consolidated Statements of Operations for Each of the ThreeTwo Years in the Period Ended January 28, 2017February 1, 2020

54

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended January 28, 201737

55

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity For Each of the ThreeTwo Years in the Period Ended January 28, 2017February 1, 2020

56

38

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For Each of the ThreeTwo Years in the Period Ended January 28, 2017February 1, 2020

57

39

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

58

40

 

51


 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TheTo the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Apex Global Brands Inc.

Cherokee Inc. and subsidiariesOpinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CherokeeApex Global Brands Inc. and subsidiaries (formerly Cherokee Inc.) (the "Company") as of January 28, 2017February 1, 2020 and January 30, 2016, andFebruary 2, 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders'stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the threetwo years in the period ended January 28, 2017. February 1, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended February 1, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has violated certain financial covenants related to its Senior Secured Credit Facility resulting in current classification of the debt. The Company has inadequate cash on hand to meet such obligations, which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Anmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit includesof its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Cherokee Inc. and subsidiaries at January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 28, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Cherokee Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated May 18, 2017 expressed an adverse opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, California

May 18, 2017April 30, 2020

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.

52


 

APEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

CHEROKEE INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(amounts inIn thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 28,

    

January 30,

 

    

2017

 

2016

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

8,378

 

$

6,534

Receivables

 

 

21,873

 

 

7,365

Other receivables

 

 

3,292

 

 

 —

Income taxes receivable

 

 

1,020

 

 

707

Inventory, net

 

 

1,567

 

 

 —

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

5,010

 

 

425

Total current assets

 

 

41,140

 

 

15,031

Intangible assets, net

 

 

106,193

 

 

53,095

Goodwill

 

 

15,794

 

 

100

Deferred tax asset

 

 

 —

 

 

1,136

Property and equipment, net

 

 

1,311

 

 

1,151

Other assets

 

 

1,578

 

 

35

Total assets

 

$

166,016

 

$

70,548

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other accrued payables

 

$

26,736

 

$

2,195

Current portion of long term debt

 

 

1,241

 

 

8,456

Related party Ravich loan

 

 

3,896

 

 

 —

Deferred revenue—current

 

 

7,015

 

 

479

Accrued compensation payable

 

 

935

 

 

891

Income taxes payable—current

 

 

347

 

 

 —

Total current liabilities

 

 

40,170

 

 

12,021

Long term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liability

 

 

7,718

 

 

 —

Income taxes payable—non-current

 

 

 3,041

 

 

 —

Long term debt

 

 

41,595

 

 

15,068

Other non-current

 

 

1,174

 

 

1,388

Total liabilities

 

 

93,698

 

 

28,477

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $.02 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Common stock, $.02 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 12,951,284 shares issued and outstanding at January 28, 2017 and 8,720,012 issued and outstanding at January 30, 2016

 

 

259

 

 

174

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

66,612

 

 

27,822

Retained earnings

 

 

5,414

 

 

14,075

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

33

 

 

 —

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

72,318

 

 

42,071

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

166,016

 

$

70,548

 

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

 

1,209

 

 

$

 

4,284

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

 

4,962

 

 

 

 

4,363

 

Other receivables

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

 

339

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

 

1,431

 

 

 

 

857

 

Total current assets

 

 

 

7,759

 

 

 

 

9,843

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

 

620

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

 

59,110

 

 

 

 

64,751

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

12,152

 

 

 

 

16,252

 

Accrued revenue and other assets

 

 

 

3,582

 

 

 

 

1,645

 

Total assets

 

$

 

82,922

 

 

$

 

93,111

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

$

 

6,282

 

 

$

 

7,834

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

 

56,044

 

 

 

 

1,300

 

Deferred revenue—current

 

 

 

3,551

 

 

 

 

1,626

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

 

65,877

 

 

 

 

10,760

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,154

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

 

9,515

 

 

 

 

11,268

 

Long-term lease liabilities

 

 

 

1,389

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

794

 

 

 

 

2,807

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

77,575

 

 

 

 

77,989

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $.02 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $.02 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, shares issued

   5,570,530 (February 1, 2020) and 4,900,318 (February 2, 2019)

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

 

98

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

 

78,541

 

 

 

 

76,829

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

 

(73,305

)

 

 

 

(61,805

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

5,347

 

 

 

 

15,122

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

 

82,922

 

 

$

 

93,111

 

 

The accompanyingSee notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

53


CHEROKEE INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 28,

    

January 30,

    

January 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Royalty revenues

 

$

34,022

 

$

34,654

 

$

34,968

 

Indirect product sales

 

 

6,599

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Total revenues

 

 

40,621

 

 

34,654

 

 

34,968

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

5,083

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Gross profit

 

 

35,538

 

 

34,654

 

 

34,968

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

34,243

 

 

20,456

 

 

18,648

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

912

 

 

882

 

 

932

 

Restructure charges

 

 

3,782

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(3,399)

 

 

13,316

 

 

15,388

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(1,661)

 

 

(711)

 

 

(854)

 

Interest income and other income, net

 

 

391

 

 

186

 

 

 

Total other expense, net

 

 

(1,270)

 

 

(525)

 

 

(854)

 

(Loss) Income before income taxes

 

 

(4,669)

 

 

12,791

 

 

14,534

 

Income tax provision

 

 

3,258

 

 

4,358

 

 

4,714

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,927)

 

$

8,433

 

$

9,820

 

Net (loss) income per common share attributable to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(0.84)

 

$

0.97

 

$

1.17

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

$

(0.84)

 

$

0.95

 

$

1.15

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding attributable to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

9,424

 

 

8,674

 

 

8,429

 

Diluted

 

 

9,424

 

 

8,862

 

 

8,543

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.10

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

54


CHEROKEE INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 28,

    

January 30,

    

January 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,927)

 

$

8,433

 

$

9,820

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

33

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

$

33

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(7,894)

 

$

8,433

 

$

9,820

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of theseto consolidated financial statements.

 

 

36

55


APEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

CHEROKEE INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYOPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands)In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

    

Shares

    

Par Value

    

Capital

    

Earnings

    

Income

    

Total

 

Balance at February 1, 2014

 

8,403

 

$

167

 

$

21,069

 

$

(3,337)

 

$

 —

 

$

17,899

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,175

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,175

 

Tax effect from stock option exercises

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

198

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

198

 

Stock option exercises and equity issuances, net of tax

 

155

 

 

 4

 

 

1,582

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,586

 

Dividends

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(841)

 

 

 —

 

 

(841)

 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,820

 

 

 —

 

 

9,820

 

Balance at January 31, 2015

 

8,558

 

$

171

 

$

24,024

 

$

5,642

 

$

 —

 

$

29,837

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

2,222

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,222

 

Tax effect from stock option exercises

 

 

 

 

 

(75)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(75)

 

Stock option exercises and equity issuances, net of tax

 

162

 

 

 3

 

 

1,651

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,654

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,433

 

 

 —

 

 

8,433

 

Balance at January 30, 2016

 

8,720

 

$

174

 

$

27,822

 

$

14,075

 

$

 —

 

$

42,071

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,380

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,380

 

Tax effect from stock option exercises and equity issuances

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(401)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(401)

 

Equity offering

 

4,237

 

 

85

 

 

36,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,060

 

Equity issuances, net of tax

 

54

 

 

 1

 

 

(171)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(170)

 

Stock warrants issued

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 7

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 7

 

Retirement of common stock

 

(60)

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

(734)

 

 

 —

 

 

(735)

 

Foreign currency

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

33

 

 

33

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(7,927)

 

 

 —

 

 

(7,927)

 

Balance at January 28, 2017

 

12,951

 

$

259

 

$

66,612

 

$

5,414

 

$

33

 

$

72,318

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

Revenues

 

$

 

21,041

 

 

$

 

24,444

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

 

13,255

 

 

 

 

14,638

 

Stock-based compensation and stock warrant charges

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

 

890

 

Business acquisition and integration costs

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

 

307

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

1,134

 

 

 

 

5,755

 

Intangible assets and goodwill impairment charge

 

 

 

9,100

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(479

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

1,167

 

 

 

 

1,478

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

 

25,972

 

 

 

 

22,589

 

Operating (loss) income

 

 

 

(4,931

)

 

 

 

1,855

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

(8,809

)

 

 

 

(8,220

)

Other expense, net

 

 

 

(92

)

 

 

 

(3,273

)

Total other expense, net

 

 

 

(8,901

)

 

 

 

(11,493

)

Loss before income taxes

 

 

 

(13,832

)

 

 

 

(9,638

)

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

 

 

 

(2,332

)

 

 

 

1,901

 

Net loss

 

$

 

(11,500

)

 

$

 

(11,539

)

Net loss per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic loss per share

 

$

 

(2.12

)

 

$

 

(2.45

)

Diluted loss per share

 

$

 

(2.12

)

 

$

 

(2.45

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

 

5,412

 

 

 

 

4,710

 

Diluted

 

 

 

5,412

 

 

 

 

4,710

 

 

The accompanyingSee notes are an integral part of theseto consolidated financial statements.

 

 

37

56


APEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

CHEROKEECONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Par Value

 

 

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

 

 

Accumulated

Deficit

 

 

Total

 

Balance, February 3, 2018

 

 

 

4,666

 

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

 

74,564

 

 

 

 

(50,542

)

 

 

 

24,115

 

Adoption of ASC 606

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

275

 

 

 

 

275

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

890

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

890

 

Equity issuances

 

 

 

234

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

180

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

185

 

Stock warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,196

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,196

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11,539

)

 

 

 

(11,539

)

Balance, February 2, 2019

 

 

 

4,900

 

 

$

 

98

 

 

$

 

76,829

 

 

$

 

(61,805

)

 

$

 

15,122

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,032

 

Equity issuances

 

 

 

671

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

569

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

582

 

Stock warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

111

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11,500

)

 

 

 

(11,500

)

Balance, February 1, 2020

 

 

 

5,571

 

 

$

 

111

 

 

$

 

78,541

 

 

$

 

(73,305

)

 

$

 

5,347

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

38


Table of Contents

APEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(amounts inIn thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 28,

    

January 30,

    

January 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,927)

 

$

8,433

 

$

9,820

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

571

 

 

447

 

 

571

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

912

 

 

882

 

 

932

 

Amortization of debt discounts/deferred financing fees

 

 

184

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

1,373

 

 

(257)

 

 

845

 

Reversal of uncertain tax liabilities

 

 

 —

 

 

(271)

 

 

(756)

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

2,380

 

 

2,222

 

 

1,175

 

Excess tax benefit from stock-based payment arrangements

 

 

 —

 

 

(312)

 

 

(202)

 

Warrants

 

 

 7

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other, net

 

 

(21)

 

 

68

 

 

81

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

6,274

 

 

84

 

 

(1,369)

 

Other receivables

 

 

(3,292)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Prepaids and other current assets

 

 

(1,698)

 

 

 7

 

 

(138)

 

Income taxes receivable and payable, net

 

 

(523)

 

 

949

 

 

(911)

 

Inventories

 

 

(241)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Accounts payable and other accrued payables

 

 

8,004

 

 

344

 

 

(486)

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

6,489

 

 

 3

 

 

(77)

 

Accrued compensation

 

 

(424)

 

 

(742)

 

 

884

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

12,068

 

 

11,857

 

 

10,369

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of trademarks, including registration and renewal cost

 

 

(71)

 

 

(96)

 

 

(70)

 

Proceeds from asset sales

 

 

11,337

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

(84,598)

 

 

(12,871)

 

 

 —

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

 

(441)

 

 

(434)

 

 

(541)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(73,773)

 

 

(13,401)

 

 

(611)

 

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from Cerberus loan

 

 

45,000

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Payments of Cerberus loan

 

 

(400)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Proceeds from Ravich loan

 

 

5,000

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Payments of Ravich loan

 

 

(1,000)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Debt issuance costs

 

 

(3,866)

 

 

(30)

 

 

 —

 

Proceeds from JPMorgan Term Notes

 

 

 —

 

 

6,000

 

 

 —

 

Payments of JPMorgan Term Notes

 

 

(23,618)

 

 

(7,644)

 

 

(7,027)

 

Payments for financing of accounts receivable

 

 

(2,456)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from financing of accounts receivable

 

 

8,701

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

 —

 

 

1,859

 

 

1,855

 

Issuance of common stock

 

 

36,890

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Excess tax benefit from stock-based payment arrangements

 

 

 —

 

 

312

 

 

202

 

Repurchase and retirement of common stock

 

 

(735)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Dividends

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(841)

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

63,516

 

 

497

 

 

(5,811)

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

1,844

 

 

(1,047)

 

 

3,947

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

6,534

 

 

7,581

 

 

3,634

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

8,378

 

$

6,534

 

$

7,581

 

Cash paid during period for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes

 

$

2,805

 

$

4,152

 

$

5,700

 

Interest

 

$

1,570

 

$

638

 

$

810

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss from continuing operations

 

$

 

(11,500

)

 

$

 

(11,539

)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

1,167

 

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

1,134

 

 

 

 

5,755

 

 

Intangible assets and goodwill impairment charge

 

 

 

9,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

 

2,316

 

 

 

 

3,903

 

 

Deferred income taxes and noncurrent provisions

 

 

 

(3,440

)

 

 

 

971

 

 

Stock-based compensation and stock warrant charges

 

 

 

1,143

 

 

 

 

989

 

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(479

)

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from

   business dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

 

(599

)

 

 

 

5,635

 

 

Other receivables

 

 

 

182

 

 

 

 

133

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

 

(574

)

 

 

 

396

 

 

Other assets

 

 

 

(2,049

)

 

 

 

(1,265

)

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

 

 

(2,412

)

 

 

 

(12,255

)

 

Long-term lease liabilities

 

 

 

1,389

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

 

1,708

 

 

 

 

(2,282

)

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

 

(2,435

)

 

 

 

(8,560

)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from

   discontinued operations

 

 

 

(—

)

 

 

 

(1,380

)

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital investments

 

 

 

(224

)

 

 

 

(253

)

 

Proceeds from business dispositions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,576

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

 

 

(224

)

 

 

 

5,323

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from term loans, promissory notes and line of credit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49,250

 

 

Payments on term loan and line of credit

 

 

 

(950

)

 

 

 

(40,000

)

 

Debt issuance costs

 

 

 

(48

)

 

 

 

(3,708

)

 

Issuance of common stock

 

 

 

582

 

 

 

 

185

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

 

(416

)

 

 

 

5,727

 

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

(3,075

)

 

 

 

1,110

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

 

4,284

 

 

 

 

3,174

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

 

1,209

 

 

$

 

4,284

 

 

Cash paid for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes

 

$

 

1,222

 

 

$

 

1,267

 

 

Interest

 

$

 

5,437

 

 

$

 

6,862

 

 

Noncash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of subordinated promissory note for lease termination

 

$

 

275

 

 

$

 

 

 

Conversion of related party junior participation interests to subordinated

   promissory notes

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

11,500

 

 

The accompanying

See notes are an integral part of theseto consolidated financial statements.

57


 

CHEROKEE, INC.APEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.

Company Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(amounts in thousands, except percentages, shareApex Global Brands Inc. and per share amounts)

1.Business

Cherokee Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries “Cherokee Global Brands” or the(the “Company”) is an international marketer and manager of a portfolio of fashion and lifestyle brands, primarily licensing product in the business of marketingapparel, footwear, home products and licensing theaccessories categories.  The Company’s brands include Cherokee, Hi-Tec, Magnum, Interceptor, 50 Peaks, Interceptor, Hawk Signature, Tony Hawk, Liz Lange, Completely Me by Liz Lange, Flip Flop Shops, Everyday California, Carole Little and Sideout and related trademarks and other brands it owns or represents, as well as marketing and franchising the Flip Flop Shops brand and conducting indirect product sales to select retailers and government entities that are customers of its Hi-Tec family of footwear brands. Cherokee Global Brands is one of the leading licensors of style-focused lifestyle brands for apparel, footwear, home products and accessories.

On December 7, 2016, the Company closed a Share Purchase Agreement (“Hi-Tec Acquisition” or “SPA”) with Hi-Tec International Holdings BV (“Hi-Tec”) and simultaneous Asset Purchase Agreements (“APAs”) with various third parties, pursuant to which Cherokee Global Brands acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Hi-Tec for $87,252 in cash, excluding non-interest bearing liabilities assumed and capitalized transaction costs. Cherokee Global Brands created a legal entity entitled Irene Acquisition Company B.V. (the “buyer”) to execute the transaction.

2.Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesSideout.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements and include the accounts of the CompanyApex Global Brands Inc., Hi-Tec and its other subsidiaries.  All material intercompanyCherokee Inc. changed its name to Apex Global Brands Inc. effective June 27, 2019.  Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated during the consolidation process.

Company Year End

in consolidation.  The Company’s fiscal year comprises a 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday nearest to January 31.  The fiscal years ended January 28, 2017February 1, 2020 (“Fiscal 2017”2020”), January 30, 2016 and February 2, 2019 (“Fiscal 2016”2019”), are both 52-week periods.

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar.  Substantially all of the Company’s revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars, even though they may be generated from agreements with licensee in foreign countries. A large majority of the Company’s operating expenses are also denominated in U.S dollars and January 31, 2015any expenses that are not denominated in U.S. dollars are recorded using the average exchange rate during the period.  Monetary foreign currency assets and liabilities are reported using the exchange rate at the end of the reporting period.  Any gains or losses from exchange rate fluctuations are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. 

Liquidity and Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis of accounting, which assumes the Company will continue to operate as a going concern and which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.  Under the Company’s senior secured credit facility, the Company is required to maintain specified levels of Adjusted EBITDA as defined ($9.5 million for the trailing twelve months as of February 1, 2020) and maintain a minimum cash balance of $1.0 million.  The Company’s operating results for the twelve months ended November 2, 2019 and twelve months ended February 1, 2020 resulted in violations of this minimum Adjusted EBITDA covenant, which are events of default.  Revenues for the three months ended November 2, 2019 were lower than the Company’s previous forecasts due to lower than expected royalties reported by the Company’s licensees, which were negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty surrounding Brexit, global trade wars and increasing tariffs on footwear and apparel, and the weakening of the British pound sterling and euro in relation to the U.S. dollar.  In response, management enacted certain cash savings measures, and although operating results improved during the three months ended February 1, 2020, the cash savings measures and operational improvements were not enough to regain compliance with the Adjusted EBITDA covenant.  Subsequent to the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020, the Company’s business has been materially adversely affected by the effects of the global pandemic of COVID-19 and the related protective public health measures.  The Company’s business depends upon purchases and sales of products bearing the Company’s brands by the Company’s licensees, and the prevalence of shelter in place orders in the regions where these products are sold, together with the closure of many retail stores of the Company’s licensees, have resulted in significant declines in the Company’s royalties beginning in the first quarter of Fiscal 2021, which will likely continue for some period of time.  In response to the decline in revenues, the Company has implemented further cost savings measures, including pay reductions, employee furloughs and other measures.  The Company has classified its debt as current as financial projections, which now reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, indicate that there is a significant risk of further violations of the minimum Adjusted EBITDA covenant beyond the forbearance period agreed to with the Company’s senior lender.

The Company’s senior lender has agreed to forbear from enforcing its rights under the senior secured credit facility through July 27, 2020. Beginning with May 1, 2020 and continuing through the term of the forbearance agreement, interest and loan amortization payments will not be paid in cash, but an equivalent amount will be added to the principal amount of the term loans to be repaid in future periods.  The required minimum cash balance to be maintained by the Company was reduced during the forbearance period, and the senior lender agreed that the proceeds from the April 2020 Paycheck Protection Program promissory note of $0.7 million can be used by the Company for the working capital purposes specified under the promissory note.  The Company is required during the forbearance period to evaluate strategic alternatives designed to provide liquidity to repay the term loans under the senior secured credit facility.  In exchange for these concessions, the senior lender will receive an additional fee totaling 2% of the then outstanding loan balance when the debt is repaid.

40


Table of Contents

Future compliance failures under the senior secured credit facility, other than the Adjusted EBITDA covenant violations described above, would subject the Company to significant risks, including the right of its senior lender to terminate its obligations under the senior secured credit facility, declare all or any portion of the borrowed amounts then outstanding to be accelerated and due and payable, and/or exercise any other right or remedies it may have under applicable law, including foreclosing on the Company’s and/or its subsidiaries’ assets that serve as collateral for the borrowed amounts.  If any of these rights were to be exercised, the Company’s financial condition and ability to continue operations would be materially jeopardized.  If the Company is unable to meet obligations to lenders and other creditors, the Company may have to significantly curtail or even cease operations.  The Company is evaluating potential sources of working capital, including the disposition of certain assets, and believes that the NOL carryback provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“Fiscal 2015”CARES”) eachAct passed by the U.S. Congress in March 2020 will result in additional liquidity, although the timing of these future cash receipts is uncertain.  The Company received $0.7 million of proceeds on April 20, 2020 from a promissory note issued by one of the Company’s banks under the Paycheck Protection Program included in the CARES Act, and NOL carryback claims are expected to total approximately $8.0 million.  Management’s plans also include the evaluation of strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to execute these plans.Because of this uncertainty, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  

Reverse Stock Split  

On September 27, 2019, the Company effected a one-for-three reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of its common stock.  The Reverse Stock Split reduced the number of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock from approximately 16.6 million shares to approximately 5.5 million shares and reduces the number of authorized shares of common stock from 30.0 million shares to 10.0 million shares.  Unless the context otherwise requires, all share and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements have been revised to reflect the Reverse Stock Split, including reclassifying an amount equal to the reduction in par value of our common stock to additional paid-in capital.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Money market funds and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.  Carrying values approximate fair value.

Property and Equipment

Furniture and fixtures, computer equipment and software are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from three to seven years.  Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or related lease term, whichever is shorter.

Intangible Assets, Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

The Company holds various trademarks that are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and similar government agencies in a number of other countries.  Acquired trademarks are either capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, or classified as indefinite-lived assets and not amortized if no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors limit their useful lives.  The Company routinely evaluates the remaining useful life of trademarks that are not being amortized to determine whether events or circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.  Trademark registration and renewal costs are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.  Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired in business combinations and is not amortized.  Indefinite lived trademarks and goodwill are evaluated annually in the Company’s fourth quarter for impairment or when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment, and an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value.  The Company estimates the fair values of its indefinite-lived trademarks based on discounted cash flow models and market place multiples that include assumptions determined by the Company’s management regarding projected revenues, operating costs and discount rates.  Management’s expectations regarding license agreement renewals are also considered, along with forecasts of revenues from replacement licensees for agreements that have terminated.  The Company’s goodwill impairment test is based primarily on the relationship between the Company’s market capitalization and the book value of equity adjusted for an estimated control premium and other factors that may indicate our market capitalization does not represent fair value. Amortizing trademarks and other long-lived assets are tested for recoverability using undiscounted cash flow models.

41


Table of Contents

Deferred Financing Costs and Debt Discounts

Deferred financing costs and debt discounts are reflected in the balance sheets as a 52-week period.reduction of long-term debt and are amortized into interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

Recent Accounting PronouncementsRevenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard which will supersede(“ASC 606”) that superseded previous existing revenue recognition guidance. The standard creates a five-step model for revenue recognition that requires companies to exercise judgment when considering contract termsguidance and relevant facts and circumstances. The five-step model includes (1) identifyingwas adopted by the contract, (2) identifying the separate performance obligations in the contract, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations and (5) recognizing revenue when each performance obligation has been satisfied. The standard also requires expanded disclosures surrounding revenue recognition. During Fiscal 2017, the FASB issued additional clarification guidance on the new revenue recognition standard which also included certain scope improvements and practical expedients. The standard (including clarification guidance issued) is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is primarily engaged in the business of marketing and licensing the brands it owns or represents, as well as marketing and franchising the Flip Flop Shops brand.  These royalty revenues are recognized when earned. To date, the Company has performed a preliminary detailed review of key contracts and compared historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard.

58


The Company plans to adopt this guidance using the modified retrospective method as of February 4, 2018, the beginning inof the first quarter of Fiscal 2019 and is continuing to evaluate the impactits fiscal year ended February 2, 2019.  The adoption of the adoptionnew guidance primarily affected the recognition of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and requires additional disclosures if certain criteria are met. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods ending after December 15, 2016. The Company has adopted this guidance as of Fiscal 2017 and it did not have an impact onminimum guaranteed royalties under the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which modifies existing guidance for off-balance sheet treatment of a lessees’ operating leases. The standard requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities related to long-term leasesagreements with its licensees that were classifiedhave historically been recognized as operating leases under previous guidanceearned in its balance sheet. An asset would be recognized related to the right to useaccordance with the underlying asset andlicense agreements.  Under this new standard, such royalties are generally recognized on a liability would be recognized related to the obligation to make lease paymentsstraight-line basis over the term of the lease. The standard also requires expanded disclosures surrounding leases. This guidance is effectivelicense agreement.  Accordingly, for fiscal periods beginning after January 1, 2019. The anticipated impactlicense agreements with escalating minimum guaranteed royalties, revenues will generally be higher during the early years of the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements is still being evaluated, but the Company expects there will be a significant increase in its long-term assets and liabilities resulting from the adoption.

In March 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to simplify the accounting for certain aspects of share-based compensation. This guidance addresses the accounting for income tax effects at award settlement, the use of an expected forfeiture rate to estimate award cancellations prior to the vesting date and the presentation of excess tax benefits and shares surrendered for tax withholdings on the statement of cash flows. This guidance requires all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled.  This is a change from the current guidance that requires such activity to be recorded in paid-in capital within stockholder’s equity. This guidance will be applied prospectively and may create volatility in the Company’s effective tax rate when adopted depending largely on future events and other factors which may include the Company’s stock price, timing of stock option exercises, the value realized upon vesting or exercise of shares compared to the grant date fair value of those shares and any employee terminations. This guidance also eliminates the requirement to estimate forfeitures, but rather provides for an election thatlicense agreement than they would allow entities to account for forfeitures as they occur. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and will be adopted by the Company for Fiscal 2018. Upon adoption of the standard, the Company will record the tax effect of equity issuances within the income statement rather than paid-in capital.  The Company expects the impact to the Company’s results of operations to be immaterial.

In August 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that reduces the diversity in practice of the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments within the statement of cash flows.  This guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and allows for early adoption.  The anticipated impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements is still being evaluated.

In October 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amends the accounting for income taxes on intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. This guidance requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The income tax consequences on intra-entity transfers of inventory will continue to be deferred until the inventory has been sold to a third party. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of a fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning after

59


December 15, 2017 and allows for early adoption.  The anticipated impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements is still being evaluated.

On January 5, 2017, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which modifies guidance for determining whether a transaction involves the purchase or disposal of a business or an asset. The amendments clarify that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired or disposed of is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar assets, the set of assets and activities is not a business. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted for transactions which have not been previously reported in consolidated financial statements that have been issued. The Company has early adopted this guidance as of Fiscal 2017 in connection withunder the acquisition of Hi-Tec. Additionally, the Company currently anticipates that the guidance may result in future brand acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions instead of business combinations. Please refer to Note 3 for further information on the Hi-Tec acquisition.

In January 2017, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to simplify the testing for goodwill impairment by removing step two from the goodwill testing. Under current guidance, if the fair value of a reporting unit is lower than its carrying amount (step one), an entity would calculate an impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount (step two). The implied fair value of goodwill was calculated by deducting the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the respective reporting unit from the reporting unit’s fair value as determined under step one. This guidance instead provides that an impairment charge should be recognizedprevious guidance.  Royalties are typically earned based on the difference between a reporting unit’s fair value and its carrying value. This guidance also does not require a qualitative test to be performed on reporting units with zerolicensees’ retail or negative carrying amounts. However, entities need to disclose any reporting units with zerowholesale sales of licensed products, or negative carrying amounts that have goodwill and the amount of goodwill allocated to each. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impactbased on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

Receivables

Receivables are reported at amountscost of producing the Company expects to be collected, net of allowance for doubtful accounts.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon its assessment of various factors, such as historical experience, age of accounts receivable balances, credit quality of the Company’s licensees or franchisees, current economic conditions, bankruptcy, and other factors that may affect the Company’s licensees’ or franchisees’ ability to pay.  The allowance for doubtful accounts was $481 as of January 28, 2017.  There was no allowance for doubtful accounts as January 30, 2016.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition, deferred revenue, income taxes, valuation of intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, contingencies and litigation and stock-based compensation. Management bases its estimates on historical and anticipated results, trends and various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions about future events. These estimates form the basis for making assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

60


Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased and money market funds purchased with an original maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents, if applicable. At January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents exceeded Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) limits.

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of a sale arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the buyer’s price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.licensed goods.  Revenues from royalty and brand representation agreements are recognized when earned by applying contractual royalty rates to quarterly point of sale data received from the Company’s licensees. The Company's royalty recognition policy provides for recognition of royalties in the quarter earned, although a large portion of such royalty payments are actually received during the month following the end of a quarter.  Revenue from the indirect product sales are recognized when products are shipped and the customer takes title and assumes risk of loss, collection of the relevant receivable is reasonably assured, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, and the sales price is fixed or determinable.

The Company’s former license agreement with Target Corporation (“Target”) covering sales of Cherokee branded products in the United States accounted for a large portion of the Company’s historical revenues. This agreement was structured to provide royalty rate reductions for sales of most products covered by the agreement after Target achieved certain cumulative sales volume thresholds, such that revenue was recognized by applying the reduced royalty rates prospectively to point of sale data for these products after the defined sales thresholds were exceeded for the remainder of applicable fiscal year. Due to the terms of this license agreement, the amount of Cherokee brand royalty revenues earned by the Company from Target in any quarter has been dependent not only on Target’s retail sales of Cherokee branded products in the United States in each quarter, but also on the royalty rate then in effect after considering Target’s cumulative sales volume for most Cherokee branded products in the United States for the fiscal year. Historically, this has caused the Company to record its highest revenues and profits in its first quarter and its lowest revenues and profits in its fourth quarter. However, this trend did not continue in Fiscal 2017 and may not continue in future fiscal years due to the expiration of the Target license agreement at the end of Fiscal 2017. Any continuation of the Company’s historical revenue and profit patterns or development of any new revenue or profit patterns will depend on, among other things, the terms of the Company’s existing license and franchise agreements, excluding the Target license agreement, the terms of any new license or franchise agreements, and retail sales volumes achieved by the Company’s licensees and franchisees.

Revenues from arrangements involving license fees, up-front payments and milestone payments, which are received or billable by the Company in connection with other rights and services that represent continuing obligations of the Company, are deferred and recognized in accordance with the license agreement. Deferred revenues also represent minimum licenseeagreements.  The cumulative effect on adoption of ASC 606 totaled $0.3 million, resulting in a charge to accrued revenue royalties paid in advanceand an adjustment to deferred revenue with a corresponding credit to accumulated deficit for all contracts not completed as of the culminationadoption date.  As a result of applying ASC 606, the earnings process,Company recognized additional revenue of $0.9 million and $1.1 million for the majority of whichyears ended February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively.  

The Company recognizes contract liabilities as deferred revenue when licensees prepay royalties, or from license fees, up-front payments and milestone payments that have not yet been earned.  Deferred revenue is classified as current or noncurrent depending on when it is anticipated to be recognized.  Deferred revenue totaled $3.8 million and $2.2 million at February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively.  Revenue recognized in the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019 that was included in deferred revenue at February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 was $1.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively.  The Company recognizes contract assets as accrued revenue when minimum guaranteed royalties are non‑refundable torecognized that have not yet been earned under the licensee. Deferred revenues will belicense agreements.  The Company typically bills and receives payments from customers on a quarterly basis for royalties earned or for minimum guaranteed royalties that have historically been recognized as revenue in future periodsearned in accordance with the underlying license agreement.agreements.  Accrued revenue is classified as current or noncurrent depending on when the asset is anticipated to be charged to revenue.  Accrued revenue totaled $2.2 million and $1.4 million at February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively.  Current portion of accrued revenue at February 1, 2020 was $0.5 million included in prepaid expenses and other assets.    

Franchise revenues includes royaltiesThe Company’s performance obligations are to maintain its licensed intellectual property, and franchise fees. Royalties from franchisees are based onin some cases, to provide product development and design services.  As of February 1, 2020, the Company had a percentagecontractual right to receive approximately $50.0 million of net salesaggregate minimum licensing revenue through the remaining terms of the franchiseecurrent licenses, excluding any renewals, which is primarily expected to be recognized approximately over the next 10 years.

Marketing and are recognized as earned. Initial franchise fees are recorded as deferred revenue when received and are recognized as revenue when a franchised location commences operations, as all material services and conditions related to the franchise fee have been substantially performed upon the location opening. Renewal franchise fees are recognized as revenue when the franchise agreements are signed and the fee is paid, since there are no material services and conditions related to these franchise fees.Advertising

In order to ensure thatGenerally, the Company’s licensees fund their own advertising programs.  Marketing, advertising and franchisees are appropriately reporting and calculating royalties owed topromotional costs incurred by the Company allare charged to selling, general and administrative expense as incurred and were approximately $1.3 million and $1.0 million during the fiscal years ended February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively.

Rent Expense

For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019, rent expense was recognized on a straight‑line basis over the term of the Company’s license and franchise agreements include audit rights to allow Cherokee Global Brands to validatelease.  Beginning with the amountfiscal year ended February 1, 2020, the Company adopted the provisions of Topic 842, which is described below under the royalties paid. Differences between amounts initially recognized and amounts subsequently audited or reported as an adjustment to the amounts due from licensees or franchisees is recognized in the reporting period in which the differences become known and are determined to be collectible.caption, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements”.  

42

61


Stock-Based Compensation

Stock option grants and restricted stock awards to employees and directors are measured and recognized as compensation expense based on estimated fair values, which are determined using option valuation models.  These models are based on assumptions about stock price volatility, interest rates, dividend rates and other factors.  The Companyestimated fair value is responsibleamortized over the vesting period of the award using the graded amortization method.

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring charges consist of severance, lease termination, contract termination and other restructuring-related costs.  A liability for the enforcement of its intellectual property and for pursuing third parties that are utilizing its assets without a license. As a result of these activities, from time to time, the Company may recognize royalty revenues that relate to infringements that occurred in prior periods. These royalty recoveries may cause revenues to be higher than expected during a particular reporting period and may not occur in subsequent periods.

Foreign Withholding Taxes

Licensing and franchising revenueseverance costs is recognized grosswhen the plan of withholding taxes that are remitted by the Company’s licensees and franchisees directly to their local tax authorities.

Deferred Financing Costs and Debt Discount

Deferred financing costs and debt discounts are capitalized and amortized into interest expense over the life of the debt.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of property and equipment sold or retired are written off, and the resulting gains or losses are included in current operations. Depreciation is provided on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the related asset.

Intangible Assets

The Company holds various trademarks, including Cherokee®, Hi-Tec ®, Magnum ®, 50 Peaks®, Interceptor®, Hawk Signature®, Tony Hawk®, Liz Lange®, Completely Me by Liz Lange®, Flip Flop Shops®, Everyday California®, Sideout®, Sideout Sport®, Carole Little®, Saint Tropez-West®, Chorus Line®, All That Jazz®, and others, in connection with numerous categories of apparel and other goods. These trademarks are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and corresponding government agencies in a number of other countries. The Company also holds trademark applications for each of these brand names and others in numerous countries. The Company intends to renew these registrations, as appropriate, prior to expiration. The Company monitors on an ongoing basis unauthorized uses of the Company’s trademarks, and relies primarily upon a combination of trademarks, know-how, trade secrets, and contractual restrictions to protect the Company’s intellectual property rights domestically and internationally.

Trademark registration and renewal fees are capitalized and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Trademark acquisitions are capitalized and are either amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or are capitalized as indefinite-lived assets, if no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors limit their useful lives to Cherokee Global Brands. Trademarks are evaluated for the possibility of impairment at least annually or when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment.

Franchise agreements havetermination has been treated as finite-lived and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the agreements. Franchise agreements are evaluated for the possibility of impairment at least annually or when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Assets

Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets are tested annually for impairment or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognizedcommunicated to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. This determinationaffected employees and is mademeasured at the reporting unit level which may be either an operating segment or one level below an operating segment if discrete financial information is available. Two or more reporting units within an operating segment may be aggregated for impairment testing if they have similar economic characteristics. In accordance with authoritative guidance, the Company may first assess qualitative factors relevant in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting units are less than their carrying

62


amounts. Based on this analysis, the Company may determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. If it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the amount of any impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit is determined using two steps. First, the Company determines the fair value of the reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires unobservable inputs (Level 3) within the fair value hierarchy. These inputs include selection of an appropriate discount rate and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. Second, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value an impairment loss isat the communication date.  Lease and contract termination costs are recognized for any excess ofat the carrying amount ofdate the reporting unit’s goodwillCompany ceases using the rights conveyed by the lease or contract and other intangibles over the implied fair value. The impliedare measured at fair value, which is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with authoritative guidance.

Valuation of Assets and Liabilities in Connection with Business Combinations

The Company has acquired material intangible assets in connection with business combinations. These intangible assets consist primarily of brands and distributor relationships.  Discounted cash flow models are typically used to determine the fair values of these intangible assets for purposes of allocating consideration paid to the net assets acquired in a business combination. These models require the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, estimating the timing of and future net cash flows from intangible asset groupings and developing appropriate discount rates to calculate the present value of cash flows.

Significant estimates and assumptions are also required to determine the acquisition date fair values of certain tangible assets such as inventory.  The Company believes the fair values used to record intangible assets acquired and other tangible assets acquired in connection with business combinations are based upon reasonable estimates and assumptions given the facts and circumstances as of the related valuation dates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1:  Observable inputs, such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets

Level 2:  Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market‑corroborated inputs

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the owner of the assets or liabilities to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would price these assets or liabilities

The carrying amount of receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair value due to the short‑term nature of these instruments. Long‑term debt approximates fair value due to the variable rate nature of the debt.

Long‑lived assets that will no longer be used in the business are written off in the period identified, since they will no longer generate any positive cash flows for the Company. Long-lived assets that will continue to be used by the Company need to be evaluated for recoverability when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment. This evaluation is based on various analyses, including cash flow and profitability projections. These analyses involve management judgment based on various estimates and assumptions. In the event the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the net book value of the assets, the carrying value of the assets will be written down to their estimated fair value, in accordance with authoritative guidance. The estimated undiscounted cash flows used for this nonrecurring fair value measurement are considered a Level 3 input, which consist of unobservable inputs that reflect assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability. These inputs would be based on the best information available, including the Company’s own data. To date, there has been no impairment of long-lived assets.

63


remaining contractual lease obligations reduced by estimated sublease rentals, if any.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.  Under this method, deferredDeferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income induring the period that includes the enactment date.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.  In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considers estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.  The Company records the tax effect of equity issuances within the income statement.

The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for thebased on financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax positionpositions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.  It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure.  A tax position is to be initially recognized in the consolidated financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities.  Such tax positions are to be initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and receivables. Cherokee Global Brands limits credit risk with respect to cash by maintaining cash balances with quality financial institutions. At January 28, 2017, January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents exceeded FDIC limits.

The Company maintains cash balances denominated in foreign currencies within foreign bank accounts.  The Company is exposed to risks relating to maintaining foreign currencies.  See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for additional information.

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are minimal due to the limited amount of open receivables and due to the nature of the Company’s licensing business. Generally, the Company does not require collateral or other security to support licensee receivables. One licensee, Target, accounted for approximately 13% and 43%, respectively, of trade receivables at January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016 and approximately 39%, 53% and 53%, respectively, of revenues during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015. Another licensee, Kohl’s, accounted for approximately 5% and 16% of trade receivables at January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016 and approximately 14% of revenues during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015.  Additionally, one Hi-Tec customer, Denstock Australia, accounted for approximately 17% of trade receivables at January 28, 2017.

Marketing and Advertising

Generally, the Company’s licensees and franchisees fund their own advertising programs. Cherokee Global Brands’ marketing, advertising and promotional costs were approximately $1,399,  $964 and $956 during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively. These costs are expensed as incurred and were accounted for as selling, general and administrative expenses.

The Company provides marketing expense money to certain large licensees based upon sales criteria to help them build the Company’s licensed brands in their respective territories, thus providing an identifiable benefit to Cherokee Global Brands; the amounts paid for such marketing expenses during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 were approximately $580,  $389 and $222, respectively, and are included in the Company’s total marketing, advertising and promotional costs.

64


Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing the net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted averageweighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutedperiod, while diluted EPS is similar to the computation for basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. However, nonvested restricted stock awards (referred to as participating securities) are excluded fromadditionally includes the dilutive impacteffect of common equivalent shares outstanding in accordance with authoritative guidance under the two‑class method, since the nonvested restricted stockholders are entitled to participate in dividends declared on common stock as if the shares were fully vested and as a result, are deemed to be participating securities. Under the two‑class method, earnings attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders are excluded from net earnings attributable to common stockholders for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per common share. Shares of nonvested restricted stock have no material impact on the calculation under the two‑class method.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Authoritative guidance establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income and its components in consolidated financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss), as defined, includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period. For Fiscal 2017, the Company had a foreign currency translation adjustment of $33 included in comprehensive income.  For Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, the Company had no comprehensive income components and accordingly, net income equaled comprehensive income.

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment

The local selling currency is typically the functional currency for all of the Company’s international operations, and in certain cases the U.S. dollar is the functional currency. In accordance with authoritative guidance, assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations are translated from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars at period-end rates, while income and expenses are translated at the weighted average exchange rates for the period.

Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses

Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currencies other than the Company’s functional currency, including gains and losses on foreign currency contracts, are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Gains or losses related to transactions where settlement is anticipated, or those that result from the remeasurement of receivables and payables denominated in currencies other than the Company’s functional currency, are included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations.  All long term assets are valued at their historical costs in U.S. dollars and therefore no gain or loss is recognized.  All intercompany transactions are recorded in U.S. dollars and therefore there are no gains or losses recognized.

Treasury Stock

Repurchased shares of the Company’s common stock are held as treasury shares until they are reissued or retired. When the Company reissues treasury stock, and the proceeds from the sale exceed the average price that was paid by the Company to acquire the shares, the Company records such excess as an increase in additional paid‑in capital.

Conversely, if the proceeds from the sale are less than the average price the Company paid to acquire the shares, the Company records such difference as a decrease in additional paid‑in capital to the extent of increases previously recorded, with the balance recorded as a decrease in retained earnings.

Additionally, if treasury stock is retired, the excess of the repurchase price for the shares over their par value is recorded as a decrease in retained earnings.

65


Deferred Rent and Lease Incentives

When a lease includes lease incentives (such as a rent abatement) or requires fixed escalations of the minimum lease payments, rental expense is recognized on a straight‑line basis over the term of the lease and the difference between the average rental amount charged to expense and amounts payable under the lease is included in deferred rent and lease incentives in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For leasehold allowances, the Company records a deferred lease credit on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and amortizes the deferred lease credit as a reduction of rent expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations over the term of the lease.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for equity awards in accordance with authoritative guidance, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values.

The fair value of stock options and other stock-based awards is estimated using option valuation models. These models requirewarrants as if such securities had been exercised at the input of subjective assumptions, including expected stock price volatility, risk free interest rate, dividend rate, estimated life and estimated forfeitures of each award. The fair value of stock-based awards is amortized over the vesting periodbeginning of the award,period.   The computation of diluted common shares outstanding excludes outstanding stock options and the Company has elected to use the graded amortization method. The Company makes quarterly assessments of the adequacy of the tax credit pool to determine if there are any deficiencies which require recognition in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Inventories

Inventories acquired through business combinations are recorded at fair value upon acquisition.  Purchased inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using a standard cost method.  Standard cost consists of the direct purchase price of merchandise inventory, in-bound freight-related costs and customs or duties. Inventory as of January 28, 2017 is comprised of finished goods. Management regularly reviews inventories and records valuation reserves for damaged and defective merchandise, merchandise items with slow-moving or obsolescence exposure and merchandise that has a carrying value that exceeds net realizable value. There were no inventory reserve accounts as of January 28, 2017.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold relates to payments remitted to manufacturers or distributors of purchased productswarrants that are sold to wholesalers and government entities through indirect product sales. The wholesalers and government entities that purchase products submit payments directly to us for their product orders, and we then remit a portion of these payments representing the product cost to the manufacturer or distributor of the purchased products.

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring charges consist of severance, contract termination and other restructuring-related costs. A liability for severance costs is typically recognized when the plan of termination has been communicated to the affected employees and is measured at its fair value at the communication date. Contract termination costs consist primarily of costs that will continue to be incurred under operating leases for their remaining terms without economic benefit to the Company, offset by any sublease income to be received thereafter. A liability for contract termination costs is recognized at the date the Company ceases using the rights conveyed by the lease contract and is measured at its fair value, which is determined based on the remaining contractual lease rentals reduced by estimated sublease rentals. A liability for other restructuring-related costs is measured at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred.antidilutive.

Warrants

The Company has issued warrants to purchase 120,000 shares of Cherokee Global Brandsits common stock in connection with theto one of its Hi-Tec customer license agreement with Carolina Footwear Group, LLC (see Note 3). The warrants

66


vest in five tranches of 20,000 shares corresponding to the five year initial term of the license, plus a 6th tranche which vests only if the license is renewed for a subsequent five year period. The 6th tranche is assigned no value until such time as the related contingency is resolved. The Company accounts for these warrants under ASC 505-50 Equity-based payments to non-employees.its lenders and investors.  Because the warrants are assessed to be equity in nature, they are measured at fair value at inception. The warrants issued to the Company’s licensee are recognized in APICas additional paid-in capital and contra revenue over the period the related revenue from the license is expected to be recognized in accordance with ASCAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-60-25 and ASC 505-50-S99-1.

For  The warrants issued to the year ended January 28, 2017,Company’s lenders and investors are recognized as additional paid-in capital and, if issued related to a modification of existing debt, are charged directly to operating expenses in the Company determinedCompany’s statements of operations.  Alternatively, the fair value of warrants issued in connection with new borrowings or the stock warrantsextinguishment of existing borrowings is capitalized and amortized into interest expense over the life of the new debt using the effective interest method.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value due to their short‑term nature.  The carrying value of the Company’s long‑term debt approximates fair value as these borrowings bear interest at floating rates.

43


Table of Contents

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities.  While management bases its estimates on assumptions it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, these estimates by their nature are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty.  Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new accounting standard update (“ASU”) to simplify the accounting for income taxes. The new guidance removes certain exceptions for recognizing deferred taxes for investments, performing intra-period allocation and calculating income taxes in interim periods. It also adds guidance to reduce complexity in certain areas, including recognizing deferred taxes for tax goodwill and allocating taxes to members of a consolidated group. This guidance will be effective for the first quarter of the Company’s Fiscal 2023, which will end on January 28, 2023. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (“Topic 326”).  For trade receivables, the Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable.  This new standard is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending January 30, 2021 (‘‘Fiscal 2021’’).  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements, but does not expect the impact to be $567.  Duringmaterial.

In March 2016, the year ended January 28, 2017, the CompanyFASB issued authoritative guidance which modified existing guidance for off-balance sheet treatment of a lessee’s operating leases (“Topic 842”).  The standard requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities related to long-term leases that were classified as operating leases under previous guidance.  An asset is recognized contra-revenue and additional paid in capital of $7, related to the amortizationright to use the underlying asset, and a liability is recognized related to the obligation to make lease payments over the term of the deferred warrant expense.

3.Business Combinations

On December 7, 2016,lease.  These amounts are determined based on the Company entered into a SPA with Hi-Tec and simultaneous APAs with various third parties, pursuant to which Cherokee Global Brands acquired allpresent value of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Hi-Tec for $87,252 in cash, excluding non-interest bearing liabilities assumed and capitalized transaction costs. Cherokee created a legal entity entitled Irene Acquisition Company B.V. to executelease payments over the transaction.lease term.  The standard also requires expanded disclosures about leases.  The Company has accountedadopted this standard as of the beginning of Fiscal 2020, electing the transition option that allowed it not to restate the comparative periods in its financial statements in the year of adoption and to carry forward its historical assessment of whether contracts are, or contain, leases, along with its historical assessment of lease classifications and initial direct costs.

The Company’s leases obligations comprise primarily individual leases for this transaction under Accounting Standards Update 2017-01.

office space without multiple components.  The Company completeddetermines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception by evaluating various factors, including whether a vendor’s right to substitute an identified asset is substantive. Lease classification is determined at the Hi-Tec Acquisition withlease commencement date when the objective of converting Hi-Tec into a licensing business that would align with Cherokee Global Brand’s core business. Thus, concurrently withleased assets are made available for use.  For the SPA, the Company entered into APAs with newCompany’s long-term leases, operating partners of Hi-Tec, including Carolina Footwear Group, LLC (“CFG or Carolina”), Batra Limited (“BL or Batra”)leases obligations are included in other current liabilities and Sunningdale (“South Africa”). These agreements provided for the salelong-term lease liabilities, and transfer of certain manufacturing-related operatingright-of-use assets of Hi-Tecare included in accrued revenue and its subsidiaries to these operating partners. Post-acquisition, consistent with Cherokee Global Brand’s planned conversion of the Hi-Tec business, the Company continues to own the intellectual property assets of Hi-Tec.other assets. The Company does not have any ownership interests inmaterial finance leases.  The operating lease obligations and right-of-use assets recognized on adoption of Topic 842 were $4.7 million and $4.6 million, respectively.  The difference between the CFG, BL or South Africa entities.

The Company completed the Hi-Tec Acquisition to gain entry into Hi-Tec marketstotal right-of-use assets and to provide Cherokee Global Brands with multiple cross-selling opportunities.

For the year ended January 28, 2017, transaction costs relatedtotal lease liabilities recorded on adoption is primarily due to the Hi-Tec Acquisition totaled $11,498 consistingderecognition of legal, due diligence, integration and other, and are recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. prepaid rent expenses.

The Company also incurred restructuring chargesuses estimates of $3,782 related to the Hi-Tec Acquisition. Restructuring charges consisted of severance, contract termination and other restructuring-related costs. A liability for severance costs is typically recognized when the plan of termination has been communicated to the affected employees and is measured at its fair value at the communication date. Contract termination costs consist primarily of costs that will continue to be incurred under the contract for their remaining terms without economic benefit to the Company. A liability for lease obligations is recognized at the date the Company ceases using the rights conveyed by the lease contract and is measured at its fair value, which is determinedincremental borrowing rate (IBR) based on the remaining contractualinformation available at the lease rentals reduced by estimated sublease rentals. A liability for other restructuring-related costs is measured atcommencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. In determining the appropriate IBR, the Company considers information including, but not limited to, its fair value incredit rating, the periodlease term, and the currency in which the liabilityarrangement is incurred.denominated. For leases which commenced prior to our adoption of Topic 842, we used the estimated IBR on the date of adoption. When the Company has the sole option to either renew or terminate a lease, the present value of the right-of-use asset and lease obligation includes the extension period when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise the option. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring Costs Accrued (amounts in thousands)

    

 

January 28, 2017

Contract termination costs

 

 

$

386

Leases, net of sublease

 

 

 

1,920

Severance costs

 

 

 

1,270

Service costs

 

 

 

206

Total Restructuring costs identified

 

 

$

3,782

 

 

 

 

 

44

67


Table of Contents

2.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consists of the following:

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

 

5,491

 

 

$

 

4,990

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

(529

)

 

 

 

(627

)

 

 

$

 

4,962

 

 

$

 

4,363

 

An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided for based on the Company’s assessment of various factors that may affect the Company’s licensees’ ability to pay, such as historical experience, age of accounts receivable balances, credit quality of the Company’s licensees, current economic conditions and bankruptcy.

3.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following:

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

Computer Equipment

 

$

 

609

 

 

$

 

642

 

Software

 

 

 

370

 

 

 

 

276

 

Furniture and Fixtures

 

 

 

1,902

 

 

 

 

1,946

 

Leasehold Improvements

 

 

 

412

 

 

 

 

807

 

 

 

 

 

3,293

 

 

 

 

3,671

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

(2,974

)

 

 

 

(3,051

)

 

 

$

 

319

 

 

$

 

620

 

4.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consists of the following:

 

 

February 1, 2020

 

 

February 2, 2019

 

(In thousands)

 

Gross

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net Book

Value

 

 

Gross

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net Book

Value

 

Amortizable trademarks

 

$

 

30,153

 

 

 

 

(20,600

)

 

$

 

9,553

 

 

$

 

27,899

 

 

 

 

(19,835

)

 

$

 

8,064

 

Indefinite lived trademarks

 

 

 

49,557

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49,557

 

 

 

 

56,687

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56,687

 

 

 

$

 

79,710

 

 

$

 

(20,600

)

 

$

 

59,110

 

 

$

 

84,586

 

 

$

 

(19,835

)

 

$

 

64,751

 

The Consolidated Financial StatementsHi-Tec Acquisition during Fiscal 2017 resulted in trademarks valued at $52.4 million that were classified as indefinite lived and not subjected to amortization.  Other indefinite lived trademarks include the operating results of assetscertain Cherokee brand trademarks that were acquired in historical transactions.  The Company's revenues from its Hi-Tec, Magnum and Interceptor brands, which were acquired in the Hi-Tec Acquisition, on December 7, 2016. The following table presentswere significantly below previous forecasts for the preliminary allocationthree months ended November 2, 2019.  This was identified as an interim impairment indicator for the related indefinite lived trademarks during the preparation of the purchase consideration paid forCompany’s interim financial statements, and management performed an interim impairment test based on updated cash flow projections and discounted cash flows based on estimated weighted average costs of capital (income approach).  The Company determined that the net tangiblefair values of its Hi-Tec and intangible assets acquired based onMagnum trademarks were not in excess of their carrying values, and as a result, an interim impairment charge of $5.0 million was recorded during the three months ended November 2, 2019 to adjust these trademarks to their estimated fair values on the closing date of the Hi‑Tec Acquisition:

 

 

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

 

Purchase Price Allocation

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

2,654

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

20,782

 

Inventory

 

 

1,327

 

Other current assets

 

 

2,373

 

Asset sales

 

 

11,337

 

Total current assets

 

$

38,473

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

291

 

Intangibles

 

 

53,940

 

Favorable Lease

 

 

128

 

Total identifiable assets acquired

 

$

92,832

 

Accounts payable

 

 

4,729

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

5,868

 

Total current liabilities

 

$

10,597

 

Income tax liability

 

 

7,480

 

Income taxes payable—non-current

 

 

 3,197

 

Net identifiable assets acquired

 

$

71,558

 

Goodwill

 

 

15,694

 

Total purchase consideration paid in cash

 

$

87,252

 

The subsidiaries acquired in the Hi-Tec Acquisition contributed $7,823 to consolidated revenue and ($4,088) to consolidated net loss during the year ended January 28, 2017. The Company further acquired $1,378 of goodwill deductible for tax purposes, which is reported at the Hi-Tec segment. Please see Note 12 for Segment Reporting.

The assets and liabilities recorded in the preliminary purchase price allocation above are provisional, as the Company has not yet obtained all available information necessary to finalize the measurement of such assets and liabilities.  The measurement of acquired deferred income taxes has not been finalized as the Company is currently in the process of obtaining the necessary information to complete the analysis related to acquired net operating loss carryforwards, including the finalization of the assessment of available tax planning strategies.  In addition, the Company is also waiting on information related to certain pre-acquisition income tax filing positions of Hi-Tec in various taxing jurisdictions that will assist the Company in finalizing the amounts to record for the acquired deferred income taxes. The Company is also waiting on information to assist the Company in finalizing the recording of any assumed uncertain income tax positions. The Company is also finalizing the required working capital true-up in accordance with the SPA, and finalizing the settlement statements in relation to the APA’s. The final allocation of the purchase price is expected to be completed as soon as practicable, but no later than one year from the date of acquisition.

The fair value of intangible assets acquired of $53,940 consists of brands with an estimated fair value of $53,400 and distributor relationships with an estimated fair value of $500.  The income approach was used to determine the various acquired brand names. Under the income approach, an intangible asset's fair value is equal to the present value of future economic benefits to be derived from ownership of the asset. Indications of value are developed by discounting future net cash flows to their present value at market-based rates of return. More specifically, the fair value of the brand assets was determined using the excess earnings method. The excess earnings method is an income approach to fair value measurement attributable to a specific intangible asset being valued from the asset grouping’s overall cash flow stream. The fair value of distributor relationships was also determined using the income approach under the lost profits method.values.  The fair value of the leasehold agreementsCompany’s Interceptor brand was determinedin excess of its $2.1 million carrying value, so no impairment charge was necessary based on the income approach, wherebyinterim test.  However, the difference betweenCompany believes that increased tariffs and global trade wars have negatively impacted the contract rentcompetitive and market rent was calculated for eacheconomic environment in which Interceptor operates, and an indefinite life is no longer supported.  Accordingly, the Interceptor trademark is now being amortized over its estimated remaining yearuseful life.  During the fourth quarter, management completed its evaluation of key inputs used to estimate the lease. Renewal options were considered when contract rent was shown to be below market rent. The future rent differences were then discounted back to present value at an appropriate rate of return. Fairfair value of its indefinite lived trademarks and determined that the finished goods inventoryinterim impairment charge was appropriate.             

45

68


was fair valued based on historical and projected financial data utilizing the income approach. For finished goods inventory, the income approach estimates the fair value of the finished goods inventory based on the net retail value of the inventory less operating expenses and a reasonable profit allowance. The analysis calculates the net realizable value for the Company’s inventory on an aggregate basis. Assembled work force was valued by estimating the value of the employees in place as of the date of valuation. This estimation was performed by determining on a replacement cost basis, the costs to locate, screen, interview, hire and train new employees in their new positions.  Fair value amounts for the intangible assets were determined using inputs observed at the level 3 fair value hierarchy, and leases and inventory were observed at level 2.

Under the APAs, Cherokee Global Brand’s sold or transferred the manufacturing and operating assets and activities of Hi-Tec as of the close of the acquisition simultaneously with the execution of the SPA. The net assets recorded at fair value on the opening balance sheet pertained to the inventory subsequently sold.

The values of these sold assets at Acquisition Date had an estimated fair value of $11,337. Under the APA with CFG, Hi-Tec transferred trade receivables to CFG for $8,701 but remained wholly responsible for the full collection and remittance of the receivable balances to CFG. The receivable balances were transferred with a fee payable to CFG. Such fee is contractually determined as a 10% premium added to amounts collected by the Company during the 210 days following the closing date. A liability for remaining amounts due to CFG totaling $6,815 is recorded within other current liabilities for the year ended January, 28, 2017.  Included within the accrual is $570 of collection fee, which has been classified as other expenses.  No portion of this collection fee has yet been remitted to CFG. Proceeds and payments pertaining to this arrangement are reflected within the financing activities of the cash flow statement.

The recorded goodwill primarily results from the synergies the Company expects to realize from the combination of the entities and the assembled workforce, and the deferred tax liability in relation to the intangibles the Company acquired in connection with the Hi-Tec Acquisition.

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The Company assessed the acquisition under both SEC and US GAAP accounting guidance, and treated the transaction as an asset acquisition under SEC Regulation S-X-3-05 and as a business combination under Accounting Standards Update 2017-01.

The following table presents the unaudited pro forma combined historical results of operations as if the Company had consummated the Hi-Tec Acquisition as of February 1, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

 

Year ended

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

January 28, 2017

 

January 30, 2016

 

Gross Income

 

 

51,468

 

 

54,290

 

Net Income

 

 

8,053

 

 

11,909

 

Basic EPS

 

$

0.62

 

$

0.92

 

Diluted EPS

 

$

0.62

 

$

0.91

 

The unaudited pro forma financial information set forth above is derived from the Company’s historical financial information and the financial information of Hi-Tec for the portion of the periods presented inhas acquired other trademarks that are being amortized over their estimated useful lives, which Hi-Tec was a subsidiary of the Company, consisting of the period from December 7, 2016 to January 28, 2017. For purposes of this discussion, such period is referred to as the “Post-Acquisition Period.” The Company calculated the pro forma amounts for Hi-Tec by applying the Company’s accounting policies and retroactively forecasting and pro-rating for the periods presented the results of Hi-Tec during the Post-Acquisition Period. For purposes of these adjustments, non-recurring expenses, consisting of restructuring and other transaction costs, were removed.  The amounts of such non-recurring adjustments are $3,782 and $10,555 for restructuring costs and other transaction costs, respectively. In addition, Hi-Tec’s financial results during the Post-Acquisition Period reflect the Company’s transition of Hi-Tec’s business from a full spectrum distribution model, in which one group of affiliated companies owned the Hi-Tec brands and manufactured the Hi-Tec products prior to completion of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, to a brand licensing model consistentaverage 10 years with the Company’s business. As a result, the above pro forma financial information applies royalty rates

69


from Hi-Tec’s current license agreements to historical wholesale product sales to calculate licensing revenues, and excludes Hi-Tec’s historical operating costs relating to its former distribution business, including its product sales, marketing, purchasing and distribution costs. Additionally, interest expense included in the above pro forma financial information is based upon the Company’s current debt agreements and excludes any interest based upon the Company’s former debt agreements.

The unaudited pro forma information of the Company is presented for informational purposes only, as an aid to understanding the entities’ combined financial results. This unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information should not be considered a substitute for the historical financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP, as presented in the Company’s reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information disclosed in this report is for illustrative purposes only and is not indicative of results of operations that would have been achieved had the pro forma events taken place on the dates indicated, or of the Company’s future consolidated results of operations.

4.Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following:

(amounts in thousands)

    

January 28,
2017

    

January 30,
2016

Computer Equipment

 

$

633

 

$

561

Software

 

 

156

 

 

79

Furniture and Fixtures

 

 

2,006

 

 

1,706

Leasehold Improvements

 

 

520

 

 

436

Work in Process

 

 

128

 

 

 —

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(2,132)

 

 

(1,631)

Property and Equipment, net

 

$

1,311

 

$

1,151

Computers and related equipment and software are depreciated over three years. Furniture and store fixtures are depreciated over the shorter of seven to five years, or the remaining term of the corresponding license agreement. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of five years, or the remaining life of the lease term. Depreciation expense was $571,  $447 and $571 for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016, and Fiscal 2015, respectively.

5.Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

January 28,
2017

    

January 30,
2016

 

Acquired Trademarks

 

$

114,694

 

$

60,754

 

Other Trademarks

 

 

8,787

 

 

8,717

 

Franchise Agreements

 

 

1,300

 

 

1,300

 

Goodwill

 

 

15,794

 

 

100

 

Total Intangible Assets, gross

 

 

140,575

 

 

70,871

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(18,588)

 

 

(17,676)

 

Total Intangible Assets, net

 

$

121,987

 

$

53,195

 

no residual values.  Amortization expense of intangible assets was $912, $882,$0.8 million and $932$0.8 million for each of Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016,2020 and Fiscal 2015,2019, respectively.  Expected amortization of intangible assets for the Company's fiscal years ending in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 20222025 is approximately $700,  $400,  $400,  $300,$0.7 million, $0.7 million, $0.6 million, $0.6 million, and $300,$0.6 million, respectively. Certain acquired trademarks are indefinite lived and not amortized. The weighted average amortization period for other trademarks was 9.4 years as of January 28, 2017. The weighted average amortization period for franchise agreements was 10.0 years as of January 28, 2017.

Trademark registration and renewal feescosts capitalized during Fiscal 20172020 and Fiscal 2019 totaled $71. Trademark registration$0.1 million in both years. Weighted-average useful life for intangible assets acquired during the year was approximately 10 years.

The Company’s goodwill amounting to $16.3 million arose from historical acquisitions and renewal fees capitalizedthe Hi-Tec Acquisition that occurred during Fiscal 2016 totaled $96.2017.  Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment in the Company’s fourth quarter, and because the Company has one reporting unit, the impairment test is based primarily on the relationship between the Company’s market capitalization and the book value of its equity adjusted for an estimated control premium.  The annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020 indicated that the Company’s goodwill was impaired, and an impairment charge of $4.1 million was recorded to reduce goodwill to its estimated fair value of $12.2 million.  

5.

Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities

Accounts Payable and other current liabilities consists of the following:

70


 

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

February 2,

2019

Accounts payable

 

$

2,814

 

$

3,120

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

 

 

413

 

 

376

Restructuring plan liabilities

 

 

1,677

 

 

3,003

Income taxes payable

 

 

291

 

 

473

Other liabilities

 

 

1,087

 

 

862

 

 

$

6,282

 

$

7,834

6. Restructuring Plans

The Company incurred restructuring charges in Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 related to the Hi-Tec Acquisition and its integration into the Company’s ongoing operations (the “Hi-Tec Plan”).  Restructuring charges were also incurred in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2018 as the Company’s staff was realigned to appropriately support its then current business (the “FY18 Plan”).  Furthermore, during Fiscal 2019 and continuing into Fiscal 2020, the Company took additional steps designed to improve its organizational efficiencies by eliminating redundant positions and unneeded facilities, and by terminating various consulting and marketing contracts (the “FY19 Plan”).    

Restructuring charges include the following:

 

 

Year Ended

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

February 2,

2019

Severance costs

 

$

78

 

$

1,241

Contract termination costs

 

 

79

 

 

3,314

Leases, net of sublease

 

 

931

 

 

469

Service costs

 

 

46

 

 

731

 

 

$

1,134

 

$

5,755

46


Table of Contents

6.Income TaxesPayments against the restructuring plan obligations were as follows:

Geographic sources

(In thousands)

 

FY19 Plan

 

 

FY18 Plan

 

 

Hi-Tec Plan

 

 

Total

 

Balance, February 3, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,031

 

 

 

 

2,501

 

 

 

 

3,532

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

5,755

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,755

 

Payments during the period

 

 

 

(2,995

)

 

 

 

(987

)

 

 

 

(2,302

)

 

 

 

(6,284

)

Balance, February 2, 2019

 

$

 

2,760

 

 

$

 

44

 

 

$

 

199

 

 

$

 

3,003

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

1,134

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,134

 

Payments during the period

 

 

 

(2,245

)

 

 

 

(44

)

 

 

 

(171

)

 

 

 

(2,460

)

Balance, February 1, 2020

 

$

 

1,649

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

28

 

 

$

 

1,677

 

7.

Debt

On August 3, 2018, the Company entered into a new senior secured credit facility, which provided a $40.0 million term loan and $13.5 million of (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxessubordinated promissory notes (the “Junior Notes”).  These credit facilities replaced the Company’s previous senior secured credit facility that was entered into in connection with the closing of the Hi-Tec Acquisition in Fiscal 2017.  On January 30, 2019, the senior secured credit facility was amended to provide an additional term loan of $5.3 million.  On December 31, 2019 the Company issued a $0.3 million subordinated promissory note to its former landlord as partial consideration for an early lease termination.  The term loans mature in August 2021 and require quarterly principal payments and monthly interest payments based on LIBOR plus a margin.  The additional $5.3 million term loan also requires interest of 3.0% payable in kind with such interest being added to the principal balance of the loan.  The term loans are secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and are guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries.  The Junior Notes mature in November 2021, and they are secured by a second priority lien on substantially all of the assets of Company and guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries.  Interest is payable monthly on the Junior Notes, but no periodic amortization payments are required.  The Junior Notes are subordinated in rights of payment and priority to the term loans but otherwise have economic terms substantially similar to the term loans.  Excluding the interest payable in kind, the weighted-average interest rate on the term loans, Junior Notes and additional subordinated promissory note at February 1, 2020 was 11.0%.

The term loans are subject to a borrowing base and include financial covenants and obligations regarding the operation of the Company’s business that are customary in facilities of this type, including limitations on the payment of dividends.  Financial covenants include the requirement to maintain specified levels of EBITDA, as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

January 28,

 

January 30,

 

January 31,

(amounts in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

United States

 

$

(3,928)

 

$

12,791

 

$

14,534

Foreign

 

 

(741)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

(4,669)

 

$

12,791

 

$

14,534

The income tax provision as showndefined in the accompanying consolidated statementsagreement, and maintain a specified level of operations includescash on hand.  (See Note 1, Liquidity and Going Concern.)  The Company is required to maintain a borrowing base comprising the following:value of the Company’s trademarks that exceeds the outstanding balance of the term loans.  If the borrowing base is less than the outstanding term loans at any measurement period, then the Company would be required to repay a portion of the term loans to eliminate such shortfall.  Events of default include, among other things, the occurrence of a change of control of the Company, and a default under the senior secured credit facility would also trigger a default under the Junior Notes agreements.  The Company’s operating results for the twelve months ended November 2, 2019 and February 1, 2020 resulted in a violation of the minimum Adjusted EBITDA covenant, which is an event of default.  However, the Company’s lender has agreed to forbear from enforcing its rights under the senior secured credit facility through July 27, 2020.  (See Note 1, Liquidity and Going Concern.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 28,

 

January 30,

 

January 31,

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

813

 

$

2,585

 

$

2,979

 

State

 

 

252

 

 

(13)

 

 

(363)

 

Foreign

 

 

1,221

 

 

1,183

 

 

1,253

 

 

 

 

2,286

 

 

3,755

 

 

3,869

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

1,088

 

$

644

 

$

630

 

State

 

 

108

 

 

33

 

 

17

 

Foreign

 

 

177

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

1,373

 

 

677

 

 

647

 

Tax Expense (benefit) recorded as an increase (decrease) of paid-in capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

(364)

 

 

(68)

 

 

182

 

State

 

 

(37)

 

 

(6)

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

(401)

 

 

(74)

 

 

198

 

 

 

$

3,258

 

$

4,358

 

$

4,714

 

The provision for income taxes differsformer credit facility included $11.5 million of junior participation interests that were held by a large stockholder, one of the board members and major stockholder, and the chief executive officer who is also one of the board members.  These junior participation interests, along with $2.0 million of cash from the tax computed usinglarge stockholder, were exchanged into $13.5 million of the statutory United States federal income tax ratenew Junior Notes referred to above with these same parties.  On December 28, 2018, the Company entered into subordinated note agreements with a large stockholder and two board members to provide working capital.  These notes totaled $2.0 million in principal and were repaid on January 30, 2019 with proceeds from the additional term loan under the Company’s senior secured credit facility.

Outstanding borrowings under the term loans and the Junior Notes were $57.9 million at February 1, 2020, and borrowings at February 2, 2019 were $58.6 million.  The unamortized deferred financing costs associated with these borrowings were $1.8 million and $4.1 million at February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively. The outstanding borrowings at February 1, 2020 were classified as current liabilities as a result of noncompliance with certain covenants required by the following items:credit facilities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 28,

 

 

January 30,

 

 

January 31,

 

 

 

2017

    

 

2016

    

 

2015

 

Tax expense at U.S. statutory rate

$

(1,587.0)

34.0

%  

$

4,349.0

34.0

%  

$

4,942.0

34.0

%  

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 

179.0

(3.8)

 

 

187.0

1.5

 

 

165.0

1.1

 

Adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits

 

233.0

(5.0)

 

 

(189.0)

(1.5)

 

 

(406.0)

(2.8)

 

Nondeductible expenses

 

151.0

(3.3)

 

 

17.0

0.1

 

 

14.0

0.1

 

Nondeductible transaction costs (a)

 

2,894.0

(62.0)

 

 

 —

 —

 

 

 —

 —

 

Valuation allowance

 

737.0

(15.8)

 

 

 —

 —

 

 

 —

 —

 

Foreign Taxes

 

86.0

(1.8)

 

 

 —

 —

 

 

 —

 —

 

Other

 

565.0

(12.1)

 

 

(6.0)

 —

 

 

(1.0)

 —

 

Tax provision

$

3,258.0

(69.8)

%  

$

4,358.0

34.1

%  

$

4,714.0

32.4

%  

47


(a)

Nondeductible transaction costs incurred in connection with the Hi-Tec acquisition.

71


A summary of deferred income tax assets isPrincipal repayments to be made during the next two years relating to outstanding borrowings under the term loans and the Junior Notes are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 28, 2017

 

January 30, 2016

 

(amounts in thousands)

    

Non-Current

    

Non-Current

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

478

 

 

492

 

Other

 

 

2,691

 

 

218

 

State income taxes

 

 

85

 

 

103

 

Compensation

 

 

1,630

 

 

1,789

 

Net operating loss and credit carryforwards

 

 

12,754

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

17,638

 

 

2,602

 

Valuation Allowance

 

 

(14,889)

 

 

 —

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

2,749

 

 

2,602

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

(10,376)

 

 

(1,281)

 

Depreciation

 

 

(91)

 

 

(185)

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(10,467)

 

 

(1,466)

 

Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets

 

$

(7,718)

 

$

1,136

 

As part of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, the Company acquired various net operating loss and credit carryforwards.  At January 28, 2017, the carryforwards included federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $15.9 million and $11.3 million, respectively. The Company’s federal and state net operating loss carryforwards both expire beginning in the fiscal year 2026. Foreign net operating loss carryforwards as of January 28, 2017 were $29.4 million and begin to expire in fiscal year 2021.

At January 28, 2017, the Company also had federal and state tax credit carryforwards of approximately $0.5 million.  The tax credit carryforwards begin to expire in 2023.

The utilization of certain federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards acquired in connection with the acquisition of Hi-Tec are subject to annual limitations under Section 382 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions.

As of January 28, 2017, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance related to its net operating losses and other deferred tax assets, excluding indefinite lived assets, for the foreign subsidiaries acquired in connection with the Hi-Tec Acquisition.  The Company has concluded that it is not more likely than not that it will realize the full benefit of the deferred tax assets principally based on cumulative losses earned by these jurisdictions.

The Company has not provided deferred taxes on unremitted earnings attributable to foreign subsidiaries that have been considered permanently reinvested. As of January 28, 2017, the unremitted earnings from these operations were not significant.

72


 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Repayment

on Principal

Fiscal 2021

 

 

1,400

Fiscal 2022

 

 

56,475

Total future principal repayments

 

$

57,875

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 28,

 

January 30,

 

January 31,

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year

 

$

 —

 

$

449

 

$

1,045

 

Additions:

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax positions taken in prior years  (a)

 

 

2,566

 

 

 —

 

 

105

 

Tax positions taken in the current year (a)

 

 

1,411

 

 

 —

 

 

57

 

Reductions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax positions taken in prior years

 

 

 —

 

 

(96)

 

 

(566)

 

Tax positions taken in the current year

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

Settlement with taxing authorities

 

 

 —

 

 

(170)

 

 

(192)

 

Lapse in statute of limitations

 

 

 —

 

 

(183)

 

 

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at year end

 

$

3,977

 

$

 —

 

$

449

 


8.

(a)

As part of purchase price accounting for the Hi-Tec acquisition, the Company recorded $3.9 million of uncertain tax positions.Commitments and Contingencies

In accordance with authoritative guidance, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included within the provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively, was $15,  $(84) and $(260). As of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, the total amount of accrued interest and penalties included in the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $167and $0, respectively.

Although we cannot predict the timing of resolution with taxing authorities, if any, we believe it is reasonably possible that $38 thousand of unrecognized tax benefits will be reduced in the next twelve months due to settlement with tax authorities or expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.

At January 28, 2017, approximately $3.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits would, if recognized, affect the effective tax rate.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal, California and certain other state jurisdictions. For federal income tax purposes, the Fiscal 2014 and later tax years remain open for examination by the tax authorities under the normal three-year statute of limitations. For state tax purposes, the Fiscal 2013 and later tax years remain open for examination by the tax authorities under a four-year statute of limitations.

73


7.Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations for each of the past three fiscal years:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

    

Income

    

Shares

    

Per Share

 

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

(Numerator)

 

(Denominator)

 

Amount

 

For the year ended January 28, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings

 

$

(7,927)

 

9,424

 

$

(0.84)

 

Effect of dilutive securities—stock options

 

 

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

Dilutive earnings

 

$

(7,927)

 

9,424

 

$

(0.84)

 

For the year ended January 30, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings

 

$

8,433

 

8,674

 

$

0.97

 

Effect of dilutive securities—stock options

 

 

 

188

 

$

0.02

 

Dilutive earnings

 

$

8,433

 

8,862

 

$

0.95

 

For the year ended January 31, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings

 

$

9,820

 

8,429

 

$

1.17

 

Effect of dilutive securities—stock options

 

 

 

114

 

$

0.02

 

Dilutive earnings

 

$

9,820

 

8,543

 

$

1.15

 

The computation for diluted number of shares excludes restricted stock units, unexercised stock options and warrants which are anti‑dilutive. There were 1.2 million, 0.2 million and 0.8 million of anti‑dilutive shares for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, respectively.

8.Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company currently leases office and warehouse facilities under non-cancelable operating leases.

Future minimum non-cancelable lease payments as of January 28, 2017 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Operating

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

Leases

 

Fiscal 2018

 

$

2,488

 

Fiscal 2019

 

 

2,422

 

Fiscal 2020

 

 

2,351

 

Fiscal 2021

 

 

2,118

 

Fiscal 2022 and thereafter

 

 

8,893

 

Total future minimum lease payments

 

$

18,272

 

Total rent expense was $584 for Fiscal 2017, $414 for Fiscal 2016 and $387 for Fiscal 2015. Total operating lease expenses, excluding rent, was $89 for Fiscal 2017, $95 for Fiscal 2016 and $84 for Fiscal 2015.

Trademark Indemnities

Cherokee Global Brands indemnifies certain customers against liability arising from third‑party claims of intellectual property rights infringement related to the Company’s trademarks.  These indemnities appear in the licensing agreements with the Company’s customers, are not limited in amount or duration and generally survive the expiration of the contracts.  Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until an infringement claim has been made, theThe Company is unable to determine a range of estimated losses that it could incur related to such indemnifications.indemnities since the amount of any potential liabilities cannot be determined until an infringement claim has been made.

74


Litigation Reserves

The Company may beis involved from time to time in various claims and other matters incidental to the Company’s business, the resolution of which is not presently expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.  Estimated reserves for contingent liabilities, including threatened or pending litigation, are recorded as liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsfinancial statements when the outcome of these matters is deemed probable and the liability is reasonably estimable.

The likelihoodCompany has non-cancellable operating lease agreements with various expiration dates for office space and equipment.  Certain lease agreements include options to renew, which are not reasonably certain to be exercised and therefore are not factored into our determination of a material change in these estimated reserves would be dependent on new claims as they may arisethe present value of lease obligations.

As of February 1, 2020, the weighted-average remaining lease term is 4.9 years, and the expected probable favorable or unfavorable outcomeweighted-average IBR is 8.8%.  The right-of-use assets as of each claim. As additional information becomes available,February 1, 2020 was $1.6 million.  Future minimum commitments under non-cancellable operating leases as of February 1, 2020 are as follows:

(In thousands)

Operating

Leases

Fiscal 2021

$

430

Fiscal 2022

442

Fiscal 2023

425

Fiscal 2024

434

Fiscal 2025

333

Total future minimum lease payments

2,064

Less imputed interest

(381

)

Present value of operating lease liabilities

$

1,683

Total operating lease costs excluding variable lease costs and sublease income expense was $0.5 million and $0.8 million for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively. Cash paid for operating lease obligations is consistent with operating lease costs for the period,

48


Table of Contents

Future minimum lease payments prior to the Company’s adoption of Topic 842 as of February 2, 2019 were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Operating

Leases

Fiscal 2020

$

854

Fiscal 2021

865

Fiscal 2022

876

Fiscal 2023

857

Fiscal 2024

863

Thereafter

1,673

Total future minimum lease payments

$

5,988

9.

Stockholders’ Equity

In connection with the refinancing on August 3, 2018, the Company assesses the potential liability relatedissued warrants to new claims and existing claims and revises estimates as appropriate. As new claims arise or existing claims evolve, such revisions in estimates of the potential liability could materially impact the Company's results of operations and financial position. No material amounts were accrued as of January 28, 2017 or January 30, 2016 related to any of the Company’s legal proceedings.

9.Capitalization

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Company's board of directors (“Board of Directors”) can determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions on the preferred stock, including any conversion and voting rights. As of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016, no shares of preferred stock were outstanding.

Stock Repurchases

Pursuant to the approval of the Board of Directors in June 2016 the Company repurchased and retired 60,082 shares of common stock in open market transactions at a weighted average purchase price of $12.24 and for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $735.

Public Offering

On December 2, 2016, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of 4,237,750397,666 shares of the Company’s common stock to its term loan lenders at a public offeringan exercise price of $9.50$1.35 per share for net proceedsand issued warrants to purchase 533,333 shares of the Company’s common stock to certain of its Junior Notes lenders at an exercise price of $1.50 per share.  Each warrant is exercisable on issuance and has a seven-year life.  Warrants to purchase 230,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were also issued to the Company’s term loan lenders in connection with the additional $5.3 million term loan on January 30, 2019 at an exercise price of $2.28 per share with a 7-year life.  The fair values of these warrants were $1.2 million on their grant dates as determined using a Black Scholes option pricing model and were included as components of deferred financing costs in the Company’s balance sheet with an offset to equity.  The following table shows the lenders, their relationship to the Company, the loan amounts provided at the time, and the stock warrants issued to such investors, if any:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Term Loan

and

Junior Note

Amounts

 

Stock

Warrant

Shares

Term Loan lenders, unrelated parties

 

$

40,000

 

 

397,666

Additional Term Loan lenders, unrelated parties

 

 

5,250

 

 

230,000

Cove Street Capital, LLC, large stockholder

 

 

9,000

 

 

415,000

Jess Ravich, board member and large stockholder

 

 

4,400

 

 

118,333

Henry Stupp, Chief Executive Officer and board member

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

$

58,750

 

 

1,160,999

The Company issued warrants to a licensee in Fiscal 2017 in connection with its acquisition of approximately $38,000, after deductingits Hi-Tec, Magnum and Interceptor brands.  The Company also granted warrants in Fiscal 2018 in connection with the underwriting discountpurchase of junior interests in the Company’s former credit facility and offering expenses paid by the Company. The net proceedsin connection with a private place of equity securities.  

Outstanding stock warrants consist of the offeringfollowing:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

February 1, 2020

 

February 2, 2019

 

 

Outstanding

Stock

Warrant

Shares

 

Average

Exercise

Price Per

Share

 

Outstanding

Stock

Warrant

Shares

 

Average

Exercise

Price Per

Share

Unexercisable warrants issued to licensee

 

 

26,667

 

$

30.00

 

 

26,667

 

$

30.00

Exercisable warrants issued to licensee

 

 

13,333

 

 

30.00

 

 

13,333

 

 

30.00

Warrants issued to junior note holders

 

 

170,369

 

 

6.75

 

 

585,370

 

 

3.03

Warrants issued in private placement

 

 

108,898

 

 

12.66

 

 

108,898

 

 

12.66

Warrants issued to term loan lenders

 

 

627,666

 

 

1.68

 

 

627,666

 

 

1.68

 

 

 

946,933

 

$

5.06

 

 

1,361,934

 

$

3.96

49


Table of Contents

Stock warrants of 415,000 shares were used to fund a portionexercised in Fiscal 2020 at an exercise price of the purchase price for the Hi-Tec Acquisition.$1.50 per share, and stock warrants of 118,333 shares were exercised in Fiscal 2019 at $1.50 per share.

Stock‑Based Compensation

Effective July 16, 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved the Apex Global Brands Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, which was amended and restated effective June 6, 2016 the Company’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of such plan (the “2013 Plan”). The 2013 Plan serves as, and which generally replaced the successorCompany’s previous stock option plans to provide for the 2006 Incentive Award Plan (which includes the 2003 Incentive Award Plan as amended by the adoptionissuance of the 2006 Incentive Award Plan) (the “2006 Plan”).stock‑based awards to officers, other employees and directors.  The 2013 Plan authorizes to be issued 1,200,000 additional400,000 shares of common stock to be issued and (ii) 121,484157,496 shares of common stock previously reserved but unissued under the 2006 Plan. No future grants will be awarded under the 2006 Plan, but outstanding awards previously granted under the 2006 Plan continue to be governed by its terms. Any shares of common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2006 Plan which are forfeited, terminate or expire unexercised and would otherwise have been returned to the share reserve under the 2006 Plan will be available for issuance as common stock under the 2013 Plan. The 2013 Plan provides for the issuance of equity‑based awards to officers, other employees and directors.

Stock Optionsprevious plans.

Stock options issued to employees are granted at the market price on the date of grant, generally vest over a three-year period, and generally expire seven to ten years from the date of grant.  The Company issues new shares of

75


common stock upon exercise of stock options. The Company has also granted non‑plan stock options to certain executives as a material inducement for employment.  The Company accounts for stock options under authoritative guidance, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock‑based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock‑based payment awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option‑pricing model.  The compensation expense recognized for all stock‑based awards is net of estimated forfeitures over the award’s service period.  The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period as a component of operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The compensation expense recognized for all stock‑based awards is net of estimated forfeitures over the award’s service period.

Stock‑based compensation expense recognized in selling, generaloperations, and administrative expenses for stock options in Fiscal 2017 was approximately $1,030,amounted to $1.0 million and $0.9 million for Fiscal 2016 was approximately $1,100,2020 and for Fiscal 2015 was approximately $800.2019, respectively.

The estimated fair value of stock options granted during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 as of each grant date was estimated using the following assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Fiscal 2017

    

Fiscal 2016

 

Fiscal 2015

 

 

Expected Dividend Yield

 

 

 

 

 —

%  

 

 

 

 —

%  

 

 

 

1.00

%

 

Expected Volatility

 

39.35

 

to

42.57

 

29.82

 

to

29.88

 

30.15

 

to

30.84

 

 

Risk-Free Interest Rate

 

0.97

%  

to

1.76

%  

1.32

%

to

1.58

%  

1.46

%  

to

1.57

%

 

Expected Life (in years)

 

3.50

 

to

4.83

 

4.58

 

to

4.88

 

4.66

 

to

4.80

 

 

Estimated Forfeiture Rate

 

 —

%  

to

10.00

%  

 —

%

to

10.00

%  

 —

%

to

10.00

%

 

 

Year End

 

February 2, 2019

Expected dividend yield

%

Expected volatility

67.8

to

84.5

 

Risk-free interest rate

2.4%

to

2.6

%

Expected life (in years)

3.0

to

3.7

 

Estimated forfeiture rate

—%

to

10.0

%

No stock options were granted in Fiscal 2020. The expected term of the stock options represents the estimated period of time until exercise anddividend yield is based on historical experiencepast dividends paid and the current dividend yield at the time of similar options, giving consideration togrant, and the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. Expectedexpected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price.  The risk‑free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant with an equivalent remaining term. The dividend yieldexpected life of the stock options is based on historical experience of similar options, giving consideration to the past dividends paidcontractual terms, vesting schedules and the current dividend yield at the timeexpectations of grant.future employee behavior.

Changes in shares under options are summarized as follows:

76


 

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Price

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

(in years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 

Outstanding, at February 3, 2018

 

 

 

125,113

 

 

$

 

31.79

 

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

 

35,333

 

 

$

 

1.77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled/forfeited

 

 

 

(21,611

)

 

$

 

34.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, at February 2, 2019

 

 

 

138,835

 

 

$

 

23.80

 

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled/forfeited

 

 

 

(63,111

)

 

 

 

38.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, at February 1, 2020

 

 

 

75,724

 

 

$

 

11.94

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

 

Vested and Exercisable at February 1, 2020

 

 

 

66,168

 

 

$

 

11.95

 

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

 

 

The following table summarizes activity for the Company’s stock options as of and for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Weighted

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remaining

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

Contractual

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Term

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

Shares

 

Price

 

(in years)

 

Value

 

Outstanding, at February 1, 2014

 

1,156,834

 

$

16.02

 

3.85

 

436

 

Granted

 

188,000

 

$

13.82

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(125,065)

 

$

14.83

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled/forfeited

 

(34,002)

 

$

12.58

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, at January 31, 2015

 

1,185,767

 

$

15.89

 

3.49

 

2,910

 

Granted

 

335,000

 

$

22.79

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(261,097)

 

$

17.06

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled/forfeited

 

(146,667)

 

$

17.33

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, at January 30, 2016

 

1,113,003

 

$

17.50

 

4.06

 

1,339

 

Granted

 

142,000

 

$

11.29

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled/forfeited

 

(162,501)

 

$

18.22

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, at January 28, 2017

 

1,092,502

 

$

16.59

 

3.66

 

 —

 

Vested and Exercisable at January 28, 2017

 

675,824

 

$

15.90

 

2.91

 

 —

 

The weighted averageweighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted under the 2013 Plan was$0.32 for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 was $3.82,  $6.35, and $3.49, respectively.2019.  The aggregate intrinsic valuevalues shown in the table above representsrepresent the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on January 28, 2017February 1, 2020 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares subject to in‑the‑money stock options)options that would have been received by the option holders hadif all option holders exercised their stock options on January 27, 201731, 2020 (the last trading day of Fiscal 2017)2020).  This amount changes based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock. The total intrinsic value ofThere were no stock options exercised foroption exercises in Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 20162020 and Fiscal 2015 was $0,  $1,731 and $411, respectively.2019.

As of January 28, 2017,February 1, 2020, total unrecognized stock‑based compensation expense related to nonvestednon-vested stock options was approximately $1,500, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.80 years.insignificant.   The total fair value of all stock options that vested was approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 20162020 and Fiscal 2015 was approximately $1,300,  $700, and $700,2019, respectively.

Performance Stock Units and Restricted Stock Units

In August 2014,addition to stock options, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has granted a performance-based equity award to an employee under the 2013 Plan, which vests in five increments dependent upon achievement of certain annual sales targets. The fair value of this award was measured on the effective date of grant using the price of the Company’s common stock.

In June 2015, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors grantedperformance stock units and restricted stock units and stock options to each membermembers of the Board of Directors and to each of the Company’s executive officers under the 2013 Plan. All of these equity awards vest in equal annual installments over three years, such that all shares subject to each award will be vested on the third anniversary ofThe Compensation Committee has approved the grant date. The fair value of the restricted stock unit awards was measured on the effective date of grant using the price of the Company’s common stock.

In April 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors granted certain performance‑based equity awards, or performance stock units to executivescompensate the Company's non-executive directors for a portion of their services in Fiscal 2020 totaling $0.4 million.  The Company intends to grant these restricted stock units as shares become available under the 2013 Plan. The performance metric applicable to such awards is compound stock price growth, using the closing price of the Company’s common

77


stock on April 5, 2016, or $16.89, as the benchmark. The target growth rate is 10% annually, which results in an average share price target of (i) $18.58 for Fiscal 2017, (ii) $20.44 for Fiscal 2018 and (iii) $22.48 for Fiscal 2019. The average share price is calculated as the average of all market closing prices during the January preceding the applicable fiscal year end. If a target is met at the end of a fiscal year, one third of the shares subject to the award will vest. If the stock price target is not met at the end of a fiscal year, the relevant portion of the shares subject to the award will not vest but will roll over to the following fiscal year. The executive must continue to be employed by the Company through the relevant vesting dates to be eligible for vesting.  The target average share price was not achieved for Fiscal 2017.

Since the vesting of these performance‑based equity awards is subject to market-based performance conditions, the fair value of these awards was measured on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo simulation model for each vesting tranche. The Monte Carlo simulation model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the performance conditions stipulated in the award and calculates the fair market value for theNo performance stock units granted. The Monte Carlo simulation model also useswere granted in Fiscal 2020 or Fiscal 2019, and previously granted performance stock units are not expected to vest because share price volatility and other variablestargets are not expected to estimatebe met during the probability of satisfying the3-year performance conditions and the resulting fair value of the award.period.   

Stock-based compensation expense for performance stock units and restricted stock units recognized in selling, generalis reported as a component of operating expenses and administrative expenses was approximately $1,350,  $1,100$0.5 million and $400$0.7 million for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 20162020 and Fiscal 2015,2019, respectively.

The following table summarizesChanges in performance stock unitunits and restricted stock unit activityunits are summarized as of and for Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2017:follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Grant-Date

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Number of

 

Grant-Date

 

    

Shares

    

Fair Value

 

Unvested stock, at February 1, 2014

 

87,000

 

$

5.70

 

Unvested stock at February 3, 2018

 

 

 

70,995

 

 

$

 

22.92

 

Granted

 

51,576

 

 

17.22

 

 

 

328,205

 

 

 

2.27

 

Vested

 

(44,640)

 

 

5.55

 

 

 

(116,251

)

 

 

11.31

 

Forfeited

 

(17,000)

 

 

7.92

 

 

 

 

(48,298

)

 

 

 

9.74

 

Unvested stock at January 31, 2015

 

76,936

 

$

13.02

 

Unvested stock at February 2, 2019

 

 

 

234,651

 

 

$

 

2.49

 

Granted

 

166,000

 

 

22.71

 

 

 

 

206,367

 

 

 

 

1.77

 

Vested

 

(27,435)

 

 

15.74

 

 

 

(277,588

)

 

 

1.93

 

Forfeited

 

(19,001)

 

 

4.27

 

 

 

 

(26,323

)

 

 

 

3.60

 

Unvested stock at January 30, 2016

 

196,500

 

$

21.67

 

Granted

 

31,500

 

 

10.08

 

Vested

 

(65,831)

 

 

21.10

 

Forfeited

 

(5,000)

 

 

17.81

 

Unvested stock at January 28, 2017

 

157,169

 

$

19.71

 

Unvested stock at February 1, 2020

 

 

 

137,107

 

 

$

 

2.33

 

As of January 28, 2017,February 1, 2020, total unrecognized stock‑based compensation expense related to performance stock units and restricted stock units was approximately $1,900,$0.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted averageweighted-average period of approximately 1.471.7 years.

10.

Significant Contracts and Concentrations of Risk

10.Debt

JPMorgan Credit Agreement

On September 4, 2012, Cherokee Global Brands and JPMorgan entered into aConcentrations of credit agreement (as amended,risk within the “JPMorgan Credit Agreement”), under which (i) a term note was issued on September 4, 2012 in principalCompany’s accounts receivable are minimal due to the limited amount of $16,600uncollected receivables and the nature of the Company’s licensing business.  Generally, the Company does not require collateral or other security to support licensee receivables. Four licensees accounted for approximately 45% of accounts receivable at February 1, 2020, and two licensees accounted for approximately 27% of revenues in Fiscal 2020.  Two licensees accounted for approximately 29% of accounts receivable at February 2, 2019, and one licensee accounted for approximately 10% of revenues in Fiscal 2019.  

51


Table of Contents

11.

Taxes on Income

Geographic sources of loss before income taxes are as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

United States

 

$

 

(4,490

)

 

$

 

(7,399

)

Foreign

 

 

 

(9,342

)

 

 

 

(2,239

)

Loss before income taxes

 

$

 

(13,832

)

 

$

 

(9,638

)

The provision for income taxes as shown in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations includes the following:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

State

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

 

(11

)

Foreign

 

 

 

1,029

 

 

 

 

941

 

 

 

 

 

1,108

 

 

 

 

930

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

 

37

 

Foreign

 

 

 

(3,413

)

 

 

 

934

 

 

 

 

 

(3,440

)

 

 

 

971

 

 

 

$

 

(2,332

)

 

$

 

1,901

 

The provision for income taxes differs from the amounts computed using the statutory United States federal income tax rate as shown in the table below.  Nondeductible transaction costs arose in the Hi-Tec Acquisition.

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

February 1, 2020

 

 

February 2, 2019

 

Tax expense at U.S. statutory rate

 

$

 

(2,905

)

 

 

 

21.0

%

 

$

 

(2,023

)

 

 

 

21.0

%

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 

 

 

443

 

 

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

 

265

 

 

 

 

(2.7

)

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

 

(2.7

)

Adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits

 

 

 

(2,769

)

 

 

 

20.0

 

 

 

 

(380

)

 

 

 

3.9

 

Nondeductible expenses

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

Nondeductible transaction costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

Valuation allowance

 

 

 

3,388

 

 

 

 

(24.5

)

 

 

 

4,616

 

 

 

 

(47.9

)

Foreign Taxes

 

 

 

630

 

 

 

 

(4.6

)

 

 

 

381

 

 

 

 

(4.0

)

Indefinite-lived intangible assets

 

 

 

(1,429

)

 

 

 

10.3

 

 

 

 

(787

)

 

 

 

8.2

 

Other

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

 

(466

)

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

$

 

(2,332

)

 

 

 

16.8

%

 

$

 

1,901

 

 

 

 

(19.7

)%

52


Table of Contents

A summary of deferred income tax assets and liabilities is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred revenue

 

$

 

16

 

 

$

 

9

 

Amortization

 

 

 

1,576

 

 

 

 

3,855

 

Other

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

 

359

 

Employee compensation

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

 

242

 

Interest expense carryforward

 

 

 

1,844

 

 

 

 

1,277

 

Net operating loss and credit carryforwards

 

 

 

31,095

 

 

 

 

26,089

 

Valuation Allowance

 

 

 

(34,759

)

 

 

 

(31,472

)

Total deferred income tax assets

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

 

359

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

 

(9,664

)

 

 

 

(11,627

)

Total deferred income tax liabilities

 

 

 

(9,664

)

 

 

 

(11,627

)

Net deferred income tax liabilities

 

$

 

(9,515

)

 

$

 

(11,268

)

The Company acquired various net operating loss and credit carryforwards as part of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, and generated additional net operating loss carryforwards in Fiscal 2018, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2020.  Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards totaled $44.2 million and $19.4 million, respectively, at February 1, 2020.  As a result of recent tax law changes, $27.1 million of the Company’s federal net operating loss carryforwards do not expire, while $17.1 million of the Company’s federal and all of the Company’s state net operating loss carryforwards expire beginning in 2026.  Foreign net operating loss carryforwards were $68.3 million at February 1, 2020 and begin to expire in 2021.  The Company has foreign tax and other credit carryforwards of $4.1 million at February 1, 2020 that begin to expire in 2023.  The utilization of certain federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards acquired in connection with the Hi-Tec Acquisition are subject to annual limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions. 

Primarily as a result of impairment charges related to certain trademarks, the Company’s acquisitionU.S. operations have sustained a cumulative pretax loss over the last three fiscal years.  Accordingly, the Company has provided a valuation allowance of rights$12.9 million at February 1, 2020 to reduce the carrying value of the underlying deferred tax assets to zero.  This valuation allowance will be maintained until there is sufficient positive evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized.  The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets of the foreign subsidiaries acquired in the Hi-Tec Acquisition, primarily due to the cumulative losses generated in these jurisdictions, and which amounted to $21.9 million at February 1, 2020.  The Hi-Tec and Magnum indefinite-lived trademarks acquired in the Hi-Tec Acquisition result in a deferred tax liability that has an indefinite life and cannot be used as a source of taxable income to support the realization of other deferred tax assets.  Accordingly, the valuation allowance reserves for the deferred tax assets in these foreign jurisdictions and results in a “naked credit” for these indefinite-lived trademarks.  This naked credit would only result in a cash obligation when the underlying trademark assets were sold.

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020, management identified an immaterial error related to the Cherokee brandremeasurement of the naked credit.  The Company used an incorrect exchange rate in the school uniforms category (the “2013 Term Note), (ii)fiscal year ended February 2, 2019 when converting the deferred tax liability from euros to U.S. dollars, resulting in a line of credit note was issued on September 4, 2012, which provided Cherokee Global Brands a revolving line of credit in principal amount of $2,000 (the “Revolver”), (iii) a term note was issued on January 10, 2014 in principal amount of $19,000 in connection with the Company’s acquisition$0.8 million overstatement of the Hawk Signatureincome tax provision for that period.  Management concluded that the impact of this error was not material and has corrected the consolidated financial statements and other financial information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to properly reflect the income tax provision and naked credit.  See Note 14 for further information.

The Company currently does not have unremitted earnings attributable to foreign subsidiaries.

7853


and Tony Hawk brands (the “2014 Term Note”), and (iv)The Company recorded a term note$3.9 million reserve for uncertain tax positions in Fiscal 2017 as part of Hi-Tec acquisition.  Gross unrecognized tax benefits are reflected in the accompanying balance sheets as reductions in deferred tax assets or in other long-term liabilities if there are no net operating loss carryforwards available to offset them.  The Company was issued on October 13, 2015granted approval in principal amountFiscal 2020 to combine certain of $6,000 in connection with the Merger with FFS (the “2015 Term Note”).

Cherokee Global Brands paid a fee equal to $30 in connection with the issuance of the 2015 Term Note, which is recognized as a debt discount during the period in which it was paid. Pursuant to the JPMorgan Credit Agreement, the maturity date for each of the 2013 Term Note, the 2014 Term Note, the 2015 Term Note (collectively, the “Term Notes”) and the Revolver was March 1, 2017, and the principal outstanding under each of the Term Notes was to be repaid on a quarterly basis. The Term Notes each bore interest equal to either: (i) an adjusted annual LIBOR rate reset monthly, bi-monthly or quarterly, plus 2.75% or 3.00% depending on the applicable senior funded debt ratio or (ii) JPMorgan’s annual prime rate or such annual prime rate plus 0.25% depending on the applicable senior funded debt ratio, with a floor equal to the one month LIBOR rate plus 2.5%.

All amounts owed under the JPMorgan Credit Agreement were secured by continuing security agreements, trademark security agreements and continuing guarantees executed by Cherokee Global and its subsidiaries in the Netherlands as applicable. In addition, the Credit Agreement included various restrictions and covenants regarding the operation of Cherokee Global Brands’ business and financial covenants that set financial standards that Cherokee Global Brands was required to maintain.

On December 7, 2016, all amounts owed under the JPMorgan Credit Agreement were repaid and the JPMorgan Credit Agreement, together with all Term Notes and the Revolver, were terminated and cancelled.

Cerberus Credit Facility

On December 7, 2016, in connection with the closing of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, the Company entered into a senior secured credit facility with Cerberus, as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders from time to time party thereto (such credit facility, the “Cerberus Credit Facility”), pursuant to which the Company is permitted to borrow (i) up to $5,000 under a revolving credit facility, and (ii) up to $45,000 under a term loan facility. Also on December 7, 2016 and in connection with the closing of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, the Company drew down a $45,000 term loan under the Cerberus Credit Facility and used a portion of these borrowings to fund the Hi-Tec Acquisition, including the repayment of substantially all of the outstanding indebtedness of Hi-Tec, and to repay all amounts owed under the JPMorgan Credit Agreement. The Company expects to use the remaining borrowings under the Cerberus Credit Facility for general working capital.

The Cerberus Credit Facility is secured by a first priority lien on, and security in, substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, is guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries, and has a five-year term. The Cerberus Credit Facility bears interest at a rate per annum equal to either the rate of interest publicly announced from time to time by JPMorgan in New York, New York as its reference rate, base rate or prime rate or LIBOR plus, in each case, the applicable margin and subject to the applicable rate floor. Borrowings under the Cerberus Credit Facility are subject to certain maintenance and other fees as set forth therein. The terms of the Cerberus Credit Facility include financial covenants that set financial standards the Company will be required to maintain and operating covenants that impose various restrictions and obligations regarding the operation of the Company’s business, including covenants that requireone tax filing group.  This determination allowed the Company to obtain Cerberus’s consent beforerecognize certain tax benefits from uncertain tax positions taken in prior years.  A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year

 

$

 

3,416

 

 

$

 

3,846

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax positions taken in the current year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

426

 

Reductions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax positions taken in prior years

 

 

 

(2,729

)

 

 

 

(261

)

Lapse in statute of limitations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(595

)

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at year end

 

$

 

687

 

 

$

 

3,416

 

Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included within the provision for income taxes in the statements of operations.  Interest recognized related to unrecognized tax benefits was a reversal (benefit) of $0.1 million for Fiscal 2020 and an expense of $0.1 million for Fiscal 2019.

The timing of resolution with taxing authorities is not predictable or certain, but the Company can take certain specified actions. Eventsbelieves it is reasonably possible that $0.7 million of default underunrecognized tax benefits will be recognized in the Cerberus Credit Facility include, among others,next twelve months due to a retroactive change in the following: any failure to make payments thereunder when due; the occurrence of certain bankruptcy events; any failure by the Company to meet certain revenue standards after the expiration or termination of any material contracts; the Company or any of its subsidiaries ceases to conduct any material part of their respective businesses; the imposition of penalties, remedies or liabilities on the Company or its subsidiaries in connection with certain criminal or regulatory actions or proceedings; and the occurrencecomposition of a change of controlconsolidated tax filing group or expiration of the Company. If an eventapplicable statute of default under the Cerberus Credit Facility occurs, subject to certain cure periods for certain eventslimitations.  At February 1, 2020, approximately $0.4 million of default, Cerberusunrecognized tax benefits would, have the right to terminate its obligations thereunder, declare all or any portion of the borrowed amounts then outstanding to be accelerated and due and payable, and/or exercise any other rights or remedies it may have under applicable law, including foreclosing onif recognized, impact the Company’s and/or its subsidiaries assets that serve as collateral for the borrowed amounts.effective tax rate.

79


As of January 28, 2017, outstanding borrowings under the Cerberus credit facility were$44,600.  Outstanding borrowings are reflected on the consolidated balance sheet net of unamortized deferred financing costs of $1,740, which will be amortized through the maturity date of the term loan.  The Company was in compliance with its financial and other covenants under the Cerberus Credit Facility as of January 28, 2017.  The Company obtained a waiver to the Credit Facility agreement on April 28, 2017, due the late filing of the Company’s Fiscal 2017 Form 10-K.  See Note 15 for further information.

Related Party Ravich Loan

On December 7, 2016, in connection with the closing of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, the Company obtained an unsecured receivables funding loan for $5,000 from Jess Ravich, the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors (such loan, the “Ravich Loan”). The Ravich Loan bears interest at a rate of 9.5% per annum and is subject to a fee equal to 2.5% of the principal amount of the loan, or $125, which was paid upon the funding of the Ravich Loan. The outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Ravich Loan will be due and payable 180 days after the closing of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, or on June 5, 2017. Events of default under the Ravich Loan include, among others, any failure to make payments thereunder when due; any failure to make payments under certain of the Company’s other indebtedness when due; and the occurrence of certain bankruptcy events. If an event of default under the Ravich Loan occurs, subject to certain cure periods for certain events of default, Mr. Ravich would have the right to terminate his obligations thereunder, declare all or any portion of the borrowed amounts then outstanding to be accelerated and due and payable, and/or exercise any other rights or remedies he may have under applicable law. The proceeds of the Ravich Loan were used to fund a portion of the purchase price for the Hi-Tec Acquisition. The Company expects that certain accounts receivable assets that are expected to be collectedfiles income tax returns in the ordinary course of business will be used to repayU.S. federal, California and certain other state jurisdictions. For federal income tax purposes, the Ravich Loan.  As of January 28, 2017, outstanding borrowings under the Ravich Loan were $4,000.

11.Unaudited Quarterly Results

The tables below summarize certain unaudited quarterly financial information for Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysislater tax years remain open for examination by the tax authorities under the normal three-year statute of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” inlimitations. For state tax purposes, the Annual Report in which these consolidated financial statements are included for descriptions of the effects of any extraordinary, unusual or infrequently occurring items recognized in any of the periods covered by this information. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in the current period or in future periods.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal year ended January 28, 2017

 

 

    

April 30,

    

July 30,

    

October 29,

    

January 28,

 

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

2016

 

2016

 

2016

 

2017

 

Net revenues

 

$

10,678

 

$

8,473

 

$

6,495

 

$

14,975

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

5,083

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

4,079

 

 

2,444

 

 

(1,362)

 

 

(9,830)

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

2,581

 

 

1,518

 

 

(873)

 

 

(11,153)

 

Net income (loss) per share—basic

 

 

0.30

 

 

0.17

 

 

(0.10)

 

 

(0.97)

 

Net income (loss) per share—diluted

 

 

0.29

 

 

0.17

 

 

(0.10)

 

 

(0.97)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal year ended January 30, 2016

 

 

    

May 2,

    

August 1,

    

October 31,

    

January 30,

 

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

2015

 

2015

 

2015

 

2016

 

Net revenues

 

$

10,230

 

$

8,482

 

$

8,098

 

$

7,844

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

5,614

 

 

2,973

 

 

2,348

 

 

1,853

 

Net income

 

 

3,571

 

 

1,928

 

 

1,546

 

 

1,384

 

Net income per share—basic

 

 

0.42

 

 

0.22

 

 

0.18

 

 

0.16

 

Net income per share—diluted

 

 

0.41

 

 

0.22

 

 

0.17

 

 

0.16

 

80


12.Segment Reporting and Geographic Information

Authoritative guidance requires public companies to report financial and descriptive information about their reportable operating segments. The Company identifies reportable segments based on how management internally evaluates financial information, business activities and management responsibility.

As a result of the Hi-Tec acquisition, the Company’s reportable segments beginning Fiscal 2017 consist of Cherokee Global Brands and Hi-Tec, for which Cherokee Global Brand’s chief-operating decision maker internally evaluates operating performance and financial results. For the year ended January 30, 2016 the Company considered the business activities to constitute a single segment, the marketing and licensing of brand names and trademarks for apparel, footwear and accessories. Cherokee Global Brands’ marketing and licensing activities extend to brands which the Company owns and to brands owned by others. Cherokee Global Brands’ operating activities relating to owned and represented brands are identical and are performed by a single group of marketing professionals.

The following tables reconcile the segment activity to the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended January, 28, 2017 and the consolidated balance sheet as of January 28, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

Cherokee Global Brands

 

Hi-Tec

 

Consolidated

 

Royalty revenues

 

$

32,798

 

$

1,224

 

$

34,022

 

Indirect product sales

 

 

 —

 

 

6,599

 

 

6,599

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

912

 

 

 —

 

 

912

 

Other (expense) income , net

 

 

(873)

 

 

(397)

 

 

(1,270)

 

Income tax provision

 

 

3,222

 

 

36

 

 

3,258

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,839)

 

$

(4,088)

 

$

(7,927)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

100

 

 

15,694

 

 

15,794

 

Total assets

 

$

67,955

 

$

98,061

 

$

166,016

 

Revenues by geographic area based upon the licensees’ country of domicile consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 28,

 

January 30,

 

January 31,

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

U.S. and Canada

 

$

22,638

 

$

24,615

 

$

24,397

 

Asia

 

 

4,457

 

 

3,792

 

 

3,564

 

Latin America

 

 

2,820

 

 

2,643

 

 

3,057

 

Africa

 

 

1,399

 

 

1,023

 

 

781

 

United Kingdom and Europe

 

 

837

 

 

837

 

 

1,636

 

All Others

 

 

1,871

 

 

1,744

 

 

1,533

 

Total

 

$

34,022

 

$

34,654

 

$

34,968

 

Long‑lived tangible assets have been located in the U.S., United Kingdom and Europe, Asia and Mexico during the three years ended January 28, 2017, with values of approximately $750,  $349,  $16 and $196, respectively, as of January 28, 2017, values of approximately $818,  $54,  $44 and $234, respectively, as of January 30, 2016 and valueslater tax years remain open for examination by the tax authorities under a four-year statute of approximately $794,  $0,  $72 and $299, respectively, as of January 31, 2015.limitations.

13.Defined Contribution Plan

12.

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company has a savings plan that qualifies asmaintains a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, under which the Company makes contributions to match the contributions made by employees participating in the plan. For Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016, and Fiscal 2015, the costs of theseThese matching contributions were approximately $154,  $137$0.1 million and $160,$0.2 million for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively.

13.

Segment Reporting and Geographic Information

The Company’s operations comprise one reportable segment, which consists of a single operating segment and reporting unit.  Revenues by geographic area based upon the licensees’ country of domicile comprise the following:

81


 

 

 

Year Ended

(In thousands)

 

February 1,

2020

 

February 2,

2019

U.S. and Canada

 

$

5,223

 

$

6,383

EMEA(1)

 

 

5,229

 

 

8,015

Asia and Pacific

 

 

7,168

 

 

6,046

Latin America

 

 

3,421

 

 

4,000

Total

 

$

21,041

 

$

24,444

(1)    EMEA includes Europe, Middle East and Africa, with Europe comprising 70% and 66% of revenues during Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.Significant Contracts

The Company’s former license agreement with Target was entered into effective as of February 1, 2008 and amended (i) on January 31, 2013 to add the category of school uniforms, (ii) on April 3, 2013 to provide for a fixed royalty rate of 2% for sales of Cherokee branded products in the category of adult merchandise sold on Target’s website (target.com) beginning  in Fiscal 2015 and (iii) on January 6, 2014 to reflect Target’s election to renew the agreement through January 31, 2017 and to provide that Target could renew the agreement for successive two (2) year periods, provided that it satisfied the minimum annual royalty payment of $10,500 for the preceding fiscal year (the “Restated Target Agreement”). The Restated Target Agreement grants Target the exclusive rightLong‑lived assets located in the United States to use the Cherokee brand and trademarks in various specified categories of merchandise. In September 2015, Target informed the Company that the Restated Target Agreement would not be renewed and, as a result, the Restated Target Agreement terminated at the end of its term on January 31, 2017 (except with respect to Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category, which will expire at the end of its current term on January 31, 2018).

Under the terms of the Restated Target Agreement, Target’s minimum annual royalty payment was $10,500 and applied to all sales of Cherokee branded products made by Target inoutside the United States other than salesamount to $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, at February 1, 2020, and $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, at February 2, 2019.

14.

Correction of an Immaterial Error in Prior Period Financial Statements

During the fourth quarter of Cherokee branded productsthe fiscal year ended February 1, 2020, management identified an immaterial error related to the remeasurement of the deferred tax liability, or naked credit, related to the indefinite-lived trademarks acquired in the school uniforms category (which products are subject to a separate minimum annual royalty payment of $800). UnderHi-Tec Acquisition.  The Company used an incorrect exchange rate in the Restated Target Agreement, Target paid royalties based on a percentage of Target’s net sales of Cherokee branded merchandise during each fiscal year which percentage varied accordingended February 2, 2019 when converting the deferred tax liability from euros to U.S. dollars, resulting in a $0.8 million overstatement of both the volume of sales of merchandise in all categories exceptincome tax provision and deferred tax liability for Cherokee branded products in the school uniforms category and, beginning in Fiscal 2015, sales of Cherokee branded products in the adult merchandise category that were made on Target’s website.period.

The Company assumedassessed the materiality of this discrepancy from a separate license agreement with Targetqualitative and quantitative perspective and concluded that the impact of the error is not material.  Therefore, the correction of the error did not require the amendment of the Company's previously filed Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The Company has corrected its consolidated financial statements for all periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as the unaudited interim financial information presented in Note 15.

The impact of the correction on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet for the Liz Lange brand in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the applicable assets in September 2012.  Pursuant to this agreement, Target pays Cherokee Global Brands a fixed royalty rate basedfiscal year ended February 2, 2019 is as follows (there was no impact on Target’s net sales of products bearing this brand.  Target has informed the Company that it has elected to not renew the Liz Lange license agreement, which expires on January 31, 2018 at the end of the current term, Target will continue to pay royalties to Cherokee Global Brands until the expiration of the agreement.  Cherokee Global Brands has entered into a master license agreement with a third party for Liz Lange branded maternity products beginning in Fiscal 2019.

In connection with the acquisition of the “Hawk” and “Tony Hawk” signature apparel brands and related trademarks in January 2014, Cherokee Global Brands and Kohl’s entered into an amended license agreement. Pursuant to the amended license agreement, Kohl’s is granted the exclusive right to sell Tony Hawk and Hawk Signature branded apparel and related productstotal operating cash flows in the United Statesconsolidated statement of cash flows):

 

 

Year Ended February 2, 2019

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

As Reported

 

 

As Revised

 

Provision for income taxes

 

$

 

2,688

 

 

$

 

1,901

 

Net loss

 

$

 

(12,326

)

 

$

 

(11,539

)

Net loss per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

 

(2.62

)

 

$

 

(2.45

)

Diluted

 

$

 

(2.62

)

 

$

 

(2.45

)

 

 

February 2, 2019

 

(in thousands)

 

As Reported

 

 

As Revised

 

Deferred income taxes

 

$

 

12,055

 

 

$

 

11,268

 

Total liabilities

 

$

 

78,776

 

 

$

 

77,989

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

$

 

14,335

 

 

$

 

15,122

 

15.

Unaudited Quarterly Results

A summary of quarterly financial data (unaudited) is presented below, which includes the correction to net (loss) income and basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share for a four-year term and has agreedthe fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019 to pay Cherokee Global Brands a fixed royalty rate based on its salesreflect the $0.8 million immaterial correction related to income taxes. (See Note 14 above).  

 

 

Fiscal 2020

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

May 4,

2019

 

 

August 3,

2019

 

 

November 2,

2019

 

 

February 1,

2020

 

Revenues

 

$

 

5,052

 

 

$

 

5,603

 

 

$

 

4,894

 

 

$

 

5,492

 

Net loss before income taxes

 

 

 

(1,620

)

 

 

 

(571

)

 

 

 

(6,136

)

 

 

 

(5,505

)

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

(2,258

)

 

 

 

(1,267

)

 

 

 

(6,828

)

 

 

 

(1,147

)

Basic (loss) earnings per share (1)

 

 

 

(0.44

)

 

 

 

(0.23

)

 

 

 

(1.23

)

 

 

 

(0.21

)

Diluted (loss) earnings per share (1)

 

 

 

(0.44

)

 

 

 

(0.23

)

 

 

 

(1.23

)

 

 

 

(0.21

)

55


Table of these products in the United States, subject to a minimum annual royalty paymentContents

 

 

Fiscal 2019

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

May 5,

2018

 

 

August 4,

2018

 

 

November 3,

2018

 

 

February 2,

2019

 

Revenues

 

$

 

5,402

 

 

$

 

7,073

 

 

$

 

5,842

 

 

$

 

6,127

 

Net (loss) earnings before income taxes

 

 

 

(1,903

)

 

 

 

(8,002

)

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

 

113

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

(2,741

)

 

 

 

(9,053

)

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

192

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share (1)

 

 

 

(0.59

)

 

 

 

(1.94

)

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

0.04

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share (1)

 

 

 

(0.59

)

 

 

 

(1.94

)

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

0.04

 

(1)

Quarterly computations of per share amounts are made independently and, as a result, the sum of per share amounts for the four quarters in any one fiscal year may not add to the per share amount for such fiscal year.

56


Table of $4,800 through January 31, 2017 and $4.6 million through January 31, 2018, the remainder of the term.Contents

15.Subsequent Events

During March 2017, the Company drew $5,000 under its available revolving credit facility with Cerberus.  Additionally, during February and April 2017 the Company repaid $2,500 of the outstanding principle under the Ravich loan.

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTSACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND  FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.None.

82


ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosuredisclosure controls and procedures”,procedures, as defined under Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e) under the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures.  Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of January 28, 2017, as a result of the material weaknesses described under “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” below.February 1, 2020.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a‑15(f) and 15d‑15(f) under the Exchange Act.  Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation ofassessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2020 based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the TreadwayTreadway Commission (2013) (“COSO”).

Under guidelines established by  Based on this assessment under the SEC, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their evaluation of internal control over financial reporting during the first year after the acquisition. As described elsewhere in this Annual Report, we are in the process of integrating the newly acquired Hi-Tec, Magnum and other associated footwear brands into our operations, including our overall internal control over financial reporting. As a result, management excluded Hi-Tec Sports International Holdings B.V. (“Hi-Tec Holdings”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Cherokee Inc. that was acquired in December 2016 in the Hi-Tec Acquisition (as defined in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report), from the scope of the evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting and from this management report on the effectiveness of such internal controls. Hi-Tec Holdings represented 16% and 19% of our total assets and total revenues, respectively, at the end of and for Fiscal 2017. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for additional information.

In conducting the evaluation described above, management concluded that, as of January 28, 2017, the matters described below represent material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses identified in management’s evaluation are as follows:

·

Consolidation of New Subsidiary.  Management concluded there was a material weakness in the design and operation of controls over our closing processes in connection with the consolidation of the newly acquired Hi-Tec operations. In the Hi-Tec Acquisition, we acquired Hi-Tec Holdings, a private Netherlands company, along with its operating subsidiaries, which are organized in a number of other jurisdictions. Neither Hi-Tec Holdings nor any of its subsidiaries has been required to file reports with the SEC or any equivalent international agency or prepare financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) in any prior reporting period. As a result, these entities lacked sufficient internal personnel and other resources with relevant experience and expertise to prepare financial statement in conformity with US GAAP. In addition, although the Company engaged accounting, valuation and tax advisors to assist with the consolidation and closing process following the Hi-Tec Acquisition, in light of the limited time between completion of the Hi-Tec Acquisition and the end of the reporting period, the Company was not able to fully identify the extent of the personnel and other resource insufficiencies and develop and implement appropriate and adequate

83


oversight of the Hi-Tec financial reporting personnel in time to meet its external financial reporting deadlines.

·

Application of Purchase Accounting Rules.  Management also concluded there was a material weakness in controls over our application of purchase accounting principles under US GAAP in connection with the Hi‑Tec Acquisition. As described in more detail in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, the Hi-Tec Acquisition was a complex transaction involving our acquisition of the equity of Hi-Tec Holdings and the contemporaneous sale of a substantial majority of Hi-Tec Holdings’ operating assets. The nature and the complexity of the series of contemporaneous transactions that constituted the Hi-Tec Acquisition resulted in difficulties applying the applicable purchase accounting rules and therefore affected our business combination controls, which was a significant contributing factor to the delay in the Company’s finalization of its consolidated financial statements for the period.

As a result of these material weaknesses and based on the evaluation described above,COSO framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective asof January 28, 2017. Notwithstanding these material weaknesses, however, management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with US GAAP.

Remediation Plan

Our management, with the oversight of our Audit Committee, has developed and initiated a plan to enhance our control procedures with respect to the material weaknesses described above. This remediation plan includes the following:

·

Internal Control Resource Assessment.  We believe our material weaknesses are largely due to a lack of appropriate personnel and other resources dedicated to our Hi-Tec operations. As a result, our remediation plan commenced with an assessment of the financial and accounting resources for these operations in order to identify the areas and functions that lack sufficient personnel and other resources.

·

Adding Hi-Tec Control-Related Personnel.  We intend to hire additional personnel, located in the Netherlands, to be dedicated to the implementation, maintenance and monitoring of disclosure and financial controls for our Hi-Tec operations, including our current efforts to recruit a US GAAP-trained controller for the Hi-Tec operations.

·

Increased Use of Third-Party Advisors.  We have engaged third-party advisors with appropriate expertise to assist with establishing and implementing financial and disclosure controls that are appropriate for our Hi-Tec operations and consistent with our obligations as a U.S. publicly traded company. These third-party advisors include accounting experts and consultants with internal control expertise.

·

Completion of Post-Acquisition Integration Efforts.  Since completion of the Hi-Tec Acquisition, we are making significant post-acquisition integration efforts to convert the acquired assets to our brand licensing model. For financial and accounting purposes, these efforts involve converting Hi-Tec Holdings’ financial, accounting and reporting controls and other related procedures to reflect the sale and separation of this entity’s former operating assets and to integrate the acquired entity and the retained assets into our existing procedures for a brand licensing business. We expect these financial and accounting integration efforts to be completed by the end of Fiscal 2018, and we anticipate the control deficiencies relating to this integration to be remediated in connection with the integration process and upon its completion.

Although we believe the steps we have already taken to date to implement this remediation plan have improved the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we have not completed these corrective processes and procedures. As a result, as we continue to monitor the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in the areas affected by the material weaknesses described above, we will perform additional procedures that we believe are necessary, including those prescribed by our Audit Committee to ensure that our financial statements continue to be

84


fairly stated in all material respects. If the remedial measures described above are insufficient to address any of the identified material weaknesses or are not implemented effectively, or if additional deficiencies or weaknesses arise in the future, there could be material misstatements in our interim or annual financial statements or we could be delinquent in filing additional reports with the SEC. The existence of material weaknesses and any failure to timely and effectively remediate them could cause investors to lose confidence in the reliability of our reported financial information, adversely affect our reputation, cause the market price of our common stock to decline, and have the other effects described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in this Annual Report.

Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm that has audited the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting, which is included on the following page of this Annual Report.February 1, 2020.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except for those matters discussed in this Item 9A, thereThere were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 20172020 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

85


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of DirectorsIn designing our disclosure controls and Stockholders of

Cherokee Inc.procedures and subsidiaries

We have audited Cherokee Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, as of January 28, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Cherokee Inc.management recognizes that any controls and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,procedures, no matter how well-designed and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtainoperated, can provide only reasonable assurance about whether effective internalof achieving the desired control over financial reporting was maintainedobjectives.  In addition, the design of our controls and procedures must reflect that resource constraints exist, and management necessarily applies its judgment in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectivenessbenefits of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policiespossible controls and procedures that (1) pertainrelative to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

their costs. Because of itsthese inherent limitations, our disclosure and internal control over financial reportingcontrols may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,all instances of fraud, misstatements or other control issues.  In addition, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure or internal controls to future periods are subject to the riskrisks, including, among others, that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Hi-Tec International Holdings BV (“Hi-Tec”) and its subsidiaries, which was acquired during the year and constituted $27.2 million and $1.0 million of total and net assets, respectively, as of January 28, 2017 and $7.8 million and $4.1 million of revenues and net loss, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Cherokee Inc. and subsidiaries also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Hi-Tec and its subsidiaries.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment. Management has identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal controls over the consolidation of the newly acquired Hi-Tec business. Management also identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal controls over the business combination process related to the application of purchase accounting principles under US GAAP in connection with the Hi-Tec Acquisition.

86


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Cherokee Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 28, 2017 and January 30, 2016 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 28, 2017. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2017 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated May 18, 2017, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Cherokee Inc. and subsidiaries has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 28, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Los Angeles, California

May 18, 2017

87


ItemITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

We reported Adjusted EBITDA for the 12 months ended February 1, 2020 that was below the required minimum in our senior secured credit facility.  In response, we entered into a series of extensions of our previous forbearance agreement with our senior lender, and on April 30, 2020, we entered into a fourth amendment to financing agreement and forbearance agreement with Gordon Brothers Finance Company and Gordon Brothers Brands, our senior lenders (the “Forbearance Agreement”), whereby the senior lenders have agreed not to enforce their rights to declare an event of default and accelerate the payment of all amounts due under our senior secured credit facility through July 27, 2020 resulting from our failure to meet the Adjusted EBITDA threshold and maintain a borrowing base value that exceeds the outstanding balance of the term loans.  Beginning with May 1, 2020 and continuing through the term of the Forbearance Agreement, interest and loan amortization payments will not be paid in cash, but an equivalent amount will be added to the principal amount of the term loans to be repaid in future periods.  Our required minimum cash balance was reduced during the forbearance period, and the senior lender

Not applicable.57

88


agreed that the proceeds from the April 2020 Paycheck Protection Program promissory note of $0.7 million can be used for the working capital purposes specified under the promissory note.  We are required during the forbearance period to evaluate strategic alternatives designed to provide liquidity to repay the term loans under the senior secured credit facility. Any failure by us to satisfy the requirements of the Forbearance Agreement or any other breach under the senior secured credit facility during the forbearance period would give the senior lenders the right to terminate the Forbearance Agreement, to declare an event of default under the senior credit facility and accelerate the amounts due thereunder.

PART III58


Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors

The information requiredtable below shows, for each of our directors, his or her name; age as of April 30, 2020; business experience and qualifications, including principal occupation or employment and principal business of the employer, if any, for at least the past five years; certain other directorships held by this Item is incorporated herein by referencehim or her; and the period during which he or she has served as a director of our Company. In addition to the information presented below regarding each nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to the conclusion that he or she should be nominated to serve as a director, we also believe all of these nominees who are incumbent directors have demonstrated integrity, honesty, adherence to high ethical standards and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as business acumen and a commitment to our Company, in their past service on our Board.

Name, Age and Positions with Our Company

Business Experience, Principal Occupation and Other Directorships

Evan Hengel, 35

Director

Mr. Hengel has been a director of Apex since October 2018. Mr. Hengel is a managing director at Berkeley Research Group in the BRG Corporate Finance group where he has served since 2007. He has experience advising management, boards of directors, and other stakeholders through restructuring and mergers and acquisition processes as both an advisor and interim executive. His clients include companies operating in the apparel and consumer products industries, as well as healthcare, technology and entertainment. Mr. Hengel received a B.S. with Honors from the University of Kansas.

We believe Mr. Hengel is well-qualified to serve on the Board of Directors due to the depth and breadth of his business experience, extensive financial experience including with mergers and acquisitions and restructurings, and his experience in the apparel and consumer products industries.

Dwight B. Mamanteo, 50

Director

Mr. Mamanteo has been a director of Apex since October 2018. Mr. Mamanteo is a managing partner at Bathala Capital, a private investment management firm, where he has served since 2020. Prior to co-founding Bathala Capital, Mr. Mamanteo was a portfolio manager at Wynnefield Capital from 2004 to 2019. Additionally, Mr. Mamanteo worked in the field of technology for over 10 years in various positions for BEA Systems, VISA International, Ericsson, UNISYS, and as an independent consultant. He has served on a number of boards, including for GlyEco, Inc., a green chemistry company, and ARI Network Services, Inc., a provider of products and solutions serving the outdoor power, power sports, marine, RV and appliance markets. Mr. Mamanteo received an MBA from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business and a B. Eng. in Electrical Engineering from Concordia University (Montreal).

We believe Mr. Mamanteo possesses a wide range of qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors, including his extensive investment experience and his experience serving on boards of directors of various companies.

59


Table of Contents

Name, Age and Positions with Our Company

Business Experience, Principal Occupation and Other Directorships

Jess Ravich, 62

Director

Mr. Ravich has been a director of Apex since May 1995 and was Chairman of the Board from January 2011 to June 2017.  Mr. Ravich currently serves as Chairman and CEO of ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc. (OTC:ALJJ).  From December 2012 until June 2019, Mr. Ravich was a Group Managing Director and Head of Alternative Products at Trust Company of the West, an international asset management firm. From November 2009 to December 2012, Mr. Ravich served as a Managing Director of Houlihan Lokey, an international investment banking firm. Prior to that, Mr. Ravich was the Chief Executive Officer of Libra Securities Holdings, LLC. Prior to founding Libra Securities in 1991, Mr. Ravich was an Executive Vice President at Jefferies & Co., Inc. and a Senior Vice President at Drexel Burnham Lambert. Mr. Ravich also serves as a director of A‑Mark (since 2014), and Mr. Ravich previously served as a member of the board of directors of Spectrum

Group from 2009 to 2014.  In addition to his professional responsibilities, Mr. Ravich in the past has served on the Undergraduate Executive Board of the Wharton School and the Board of Trustees of the Archer School for Girls.

Mr. Ravich is a long‑standing member of our Board and has a deep knowledge of our Company and the industry in which we compete.  We believe Mr. Ravich is well qualified to serve on the Board of Directors due to the depth and breadth of his business experience, experience on public company boards, extensive financial experience, technical skills across various industries, experience in mergers and acquisitions and leadership skills.

Patti Johnson, 62

Director

Ms. Johnson has been a director of Apex since April 2019. Ms. Johnson has financial experience in the retail industry with both public and private companies. Most recently, Ms. Johnson served as the Chief Financial Officer for Charlotte Russe, a fast fashion retailer, from 2010 to 2018. Prior to that time, Ms. Johnson held senior financial positions at retail organizations including: SVP Finance for Petco from 2008 to 2010, Chief Financial Officer for Old Navy, a division of Gap Inc. from 2003 to 2007 and Chief Financial Officer and SVP Finance for Kohl’s Department Stores from 1998 to 2003. Ms. Johnson holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree from California State University, Fullerton and a Certified Public Accountant license from the state of California.

We believe Ms. Johnson is well-qualified to serve on the Board of Directors due to the depth and breadth of her business experience, extensive financial experience, and her experience in the apparel industry.

Henry Stupp, 56

Director, Chief Executive Officer

Henry Stupp became our Chief Executive Officer and a director in August 2010. Prior to joining Cherokee, Mr. Stupp was a co‑founder of Montreal‑based Novel Teez Designs, later known as NTD Apparel USA LLC, a leading licensee of entertainment, character, sport and branded apparel, and a supplier to many major North American retailers, having most recently served as President of NTD Apparel USA from 2005 until 2010. During his tenure with NTD Apparel USA, Mr. Stupp contributed to the identification, negotiation and introduction of many licenses and brands to a broad retail audience. Mr. Stupp is currently serving a two‑year term as a Director of the International Licensing Industry Merchandiser’s Association. Mr. Stupp attended Concordia University where he majored in Economics.

As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Stupp brings to the Board critical insight into our operations and business. His extensive experience in the apparel business and with merchandise licensing, coupled with his in‑depth knowledge of our Company, provides our Board with important knowledge and skills and facilitates the Board’s oversight of strategic and financial planning and other critical management functions.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee comprises Ms. Johnson (Chair), Mr. Mamanteo and Mr. Ravich.  The primary functions of the Audit Committee are, among other things, to:

be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm;

review and discuss with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our financial statements before filing with the SEC any report containing such financial statements;

60


Table of Contents

oversee audits of our financial statements and meet with independent registered public accounting firm in connection with each annual audit to review the planning and staffing of the audit;

oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes, including reviewing management’s evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls;

review and discuss with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;

receive and review the formal written statement and letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board rules;

prepare and approve a report each year for inclusion in our annual proxy statement; and

pre-approve all auditing services and permitted non‑audit services to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm, subject to exceptions for de minimis amounts under certain circumstances as permitted by applicable law.

At the discretion of the Audit Committee, representatives of our independent registered public accounting firm and certain members of management may be invited to attend Audit Committee meetings.

The Board of Directors has determined that each director serving currently or at any time in Fiscal 2020 as a member of the Audit Committee satisfies all independence standards and financial expertise requirements applicable to members of such a committee under Nasdaq and SEC rules. The Board has also determined that each of Messrs. Mamanteo and Ravich is an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in applicable SEC rules.

Stockholder Recommendations of Director Candidates

In accordance with its charter, our Nominating & Governance Committee is responsible for developing and monitoring a policy regarding the consideration of director candidates recommended by our stockholders.  There have been no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend director candidates to the Company’s Board of Directors since our last provided disclosure of such procedures.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock to file various reports with the SEC concerning their holdings of, and transactions in, our securities. SEC rules also require that copies of these reports be furnished to us. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports received by us or written representations from persons subject to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, we believe our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements in Fiscal 2018, except that the Form 3 filed on behalf of Mr. Evan Hengel with respect to his appointment to the Board on November 1, 2018, was not filed until December 19, 2018, and the Form 4 filed on behalf of Jess Ravich with respect to his warrant exercise on February 1, 2019 was not filed until February 20, 2019.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors, officers and all other employees (including our principal executive, financial and accounting officers and controller or persons performing similar functions). This code satisfies applicable requirements under the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002 and Nasdaq and SEC rules. A copy of the code is contained in the Proxy Statement or an amendment to this Annual Report, either of which will be filedfilings we make with the SEC, no later than 120 days afterwhich are available on our website at www.apexglobalbrands.com or on the closeSEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We intend to disclose on our website any amendments to or waivers from the code, to the extent required by applicable law or Nasdaq or SEC rules.

61


Table of Contents

Executive Officers

The following table shows, for each of our current executive officers, their business experience and qualifications, including principal occupation or employment and principal business of the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017. Certain information regarding ouremployer, if any, for at least the past five years; and the period during which they have served as executive officers required by this Item is set forth in Part I of this Annual Report under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”our Company. 

Name, Age and Positions with Our Company

Business Experience and Principal Occupation

Henry Stupp, 56

Henry Stupp became our Chief Executive Officer and a director in August 2010. Prior to joining Cherokee, Mr. Stupp was a co‑founder of Montreal‑based Novel Teez Designs, later known as NTD Apparel USA LLC, a leading licensee of entertainment, character, sport and branded apparel, and a supplier to many major North American retailers, having most recently served as President of NTD Apparel USA from 2005 until 2010. During his tenure with NTD Apparel USA, Mr. Stupp contributed to the identification, negotiation and introduction of many licenses and brands to a broad retail audience. Mr. Stupp is currently serving a two‑year term as a Director of the International Licensing Industry Merchandiser’s Association. Mr. Stupp attended Concordia University where he majored in Economics.

Director, Chief Executive Officer

Howard Siegel, 65

Mr. Siegel has been employed by us since January 1996, starting as Vice President of Operations and Administration, becoming President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2010. Prior to January 1996, Mr. Siegel had a long tenure in the apparel business industry working as a senior executive for Federated Department stores and Carter Hawley Hale Broadway stores. Mr. Siegel attended the University of Florida where he received his Bachelor of Science degree.

President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary

Steven Brink, 58

Mr. Brink joined us in January 2018. Prior to joining us, he served from 2008 until 2016 as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and Executive Vice President of NYDJ Apparel, LLC, a women’s apparel company. Mr. Brink also served from 1996 until 2007 as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Quiksilver Inc., an international apparel company, and was a Senior Manager in the TRADE Group of Deloitte & Touche, LLP where he was employed from 1985 until 1996. Mr. Brink is a Certified Public Accountant, a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, a member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants, and he holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration from California State University at Los Angeles.

Chief Financial Officer

Item 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

For purposes of this filing, the term “Named Executive Officer” means each person serving at any time during Fiscal 2020 as our Chief Executive Officer (Henry Stupp), and the two most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer who were serving as executive officers at the end of Fiscal 2020 (our Chief Financial Officer, Steven Brink, and our Chief Operating Officer, Howard Siegel).  With respect to any disclosure requiring or including information prior to Fiscal 2020, the definition of “Named Executive Officer” shall also include any person serving in any such capacity during the applicable period.

62


Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table

The information requiredfollowing table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by this Itemor paid to our Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019:

Name and Principal

Position

 

Fiscal

Year

 

Salary

($)(1)

 

 

Bonus

($)(2)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)(3)

 

 

Option

Awards

($)(3)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)(4)

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)(5)

 

 

Total

Compensation

($)

 

Henry Stupp

 

2020

 

 

750,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60,555

 

 

 

810,555

 

Chief Executive

 

2019

 

 

675,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

192,525

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,242

 

 

 

930,632

 

Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Howard Siegel

 

2020

 

 

425,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,922

 

 

 

483,922

 

President, Chief Operating

 

2019

 

 

425,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

120,045

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,737

 

 

 

581,782

 

Officer & Secretary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven Brink

 

2020

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,837

 

 

 

438,837

 

Chief Financial

 

2019

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

120,045

 

 

 

30,051

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,983

 

 

 

632,079

 

Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts represent the base salary earned by each Named Executive Officer for each of the periods. In accordance with applicable SEC rules and interpretive guidance.

(2)

Amounts represent discretionary cash bonuses earned for performance during each of the periods presented.

(3)

Amounts represent (a) for each Named Executive Officer, the grant date fair value of awards granted during each of the periods computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 (for more information, see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report).

(4)

Amounts represent the amount of the Performance Bonus earned by the applicable Named Executive Officer for his performance during each of the periods presented.

(5)

Amounts represent (a) for each Named Executive Officer, employer‑paid health insurance premiums and vacation payouts, and the employer contributions to the Company’s 401(k) retirement savings plan paid on behalf of the Named Executive Officer.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table summarizes outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of the end of Fiscal 2020:

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

 

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

(#)

 

 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

 

 

Option

Expiration

 

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

 

 

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

 

Name

 

Exercisable(1)

 

 

 

Unexercisable(1)

 

 

 

($)

 

 

Date

 

 

(#)(1)

 

 

 

($)(2)

 

Henry Stupp

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56,667

 

(3)

 

 

38,624

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Howard Siegel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,333

 

(3)

 

 

24,083

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven Brink

 

 

11,111

 

 

 

 

5,556

 

(4)

 

 

5.85

 

 

1/3/2028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,333

 

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.63

 

 

7/6/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,333

 

(3)

 

 

24,083

 

(1)

Except as described in the footnotes below, all awards were granted under the 2013 Plan and vest in equal annual installments over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued service through each vesting date and accelerated vesting under certain circumstances.

(2)

Determined by multiplying the unvested portion of the stock awards by $0.6816, the closing price of our common stock on January 31, 2020.

63


Table of Contents

(3)

Represents an RSU award granted on October 9, 2018.

(4)

Represents an option award granted on January 3, 2018.

(5)

Represents an option award granted on July 6, 2018 that vested grant on July 6, 2019.

Employment Agreements

The following is incorporated hereina summary of the principal terms of our employment agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers.

Mr. Stupp

On July 11, 2016, we entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement with Henry Stupp, our Chief Executive Officer, which amended, restated and superseded our prior employment agreement with Mr. Stupp and which was subsequently amended on October 31, 2017. The employment agreement and the amendment were each approved by referencethe Compensation Committee. The employment agreement had an initial term that expired January 31, 2020, and it would automatically renew for three‑year terms thereafter, unless either party provided written notice of non‑renewal at least 90 days before the end of the then‑current term.  On October 22, 2019, we entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Stupp (the “Amended Agreement”) to extend his employment agreement from January 30, 2020 to January 31, 2021.  The Amended Agreement became effective on January 31, 2020 and going forward, renews automatically for one-year terms unless terminated by either party at least ninety days prior to the informationend of the then current term.  Under the Amended Agreement, Mr. Stupp is to receive a base salary of $650,000 per year in cash.  On April 3, 2020, Mr. Stupp voluntarily agreed to reduce his base compensation by 25% for twelve weeks commencing on April 3, 2020.  Mr. Stupp is also eligible to receive the Performance Bonus as described under “Cash Bonuses Under Employment Agreements” below, a discretionary annual bonus award of up to $300,000 for performance in each fiscal year to be containeddetermined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, an option to purchase 100,000 shares of our Common Stock, and a cash bonus if the Company undergoes a change in control and the per-share price received by holders of the Company’s Common Stock from such change-in-control transaction exceeds $1.00, such bonus being equal to $100,000 multiplied by the per share price received in excess of $1.00.  In addition, the amended employment agreement provides for certain payments to Mr. Stupp upon a termination of his employment with us under certain specified circumstances, as described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Mr. Siegel

On July 23, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Siegel, our President and Chief Operating Officer, which was approved by our Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Siegel is to receive a base salary equal to $425,000 per year. On April 3, 2020, Mr. Siegel voluntarily agreed to reduce his base compensation by 25% for twelve weeks commencing on April 3, 2020.  Also pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Siegel is eligible to receive the Performance Bonus, as described under “Cash Bonuses Under Employment Agreements” below. For Fiscal 2019, base salary and cash bonuses constituted approximately 73% of Mr. Siegel’s total compensation. Mr. Siegel is also eligible to receive additional cash bonuses at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and equity awards at the times and in the Proxy Statementamounts determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. In addition, the employment agreement provides for certain payments to Mr. Siegel upon a termination of his employment with us under certain specified circumstances, as described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Mr. Brink

On December 13, 2017, we entered into an amendmentemployment agreement with Mr. Brink, our Chief Financial Officer, which was approved by our Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Brink is to receive a base salary equal to $400,000 per year. On April 3, 2020, Mr. Brink voluntarily agreed to reduce his base compensation by 15% for twelve weeks commencing on April 3, 2020.  Also pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Brink received a stock option award to purchase up to 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.95 per share as an inducement material to entering into employment with us. For Fiscal 2019, base salary and cash bonuses constituted approximately 71% of Mr. Brink’s total compensation. Mr. Brink is eligible to receive the Performance Bonus beginning in Fiscal 2019, as described under “Cash Bonuses Under Employment Agreements” below, a supplemental cash bonus of at least $50,000 for continuing to be employed through January 31, 2019, additional cash bonuses at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and additional equity awards at the times and in the amounts determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. In addition, the employment agreement provides for certain payments to Mr. Brink upon a termination of his employment with us under certain specified circumstances, as described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

64


Table of Contents

Cash Bonuses Under Employment Agreements

Pursuant to the terms of Messrs. Stupp’s, Siegel’s and Brink’s employment agreements with us, each of our Named Executive Officers is eligible to receive a cash performance‑based bonus (the “Performance Bonus”) based on the level of achievement of our EBITDA (which is a financial measure that is not defined under or prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and which we define, for purposes of the Performance Bonus only and which definition differs from the definition of this Annual Report, eithermeasure used by management for other purposes, as net (loss) income before the effects of interest expense, interest income and other income, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and inclusive of any amounts payable as Performance Bonus) for each fiscal year, relative to the EBITDA target included in the budget approved by the Board for such fiscal year (and taking into account any Board approved adjustments to the budgeted EBITDA resulting from any business acquisitions or dispositions consummated during the relevant fiscal year or any other specified unusual or non-recurring transactions or events). The Compensation Committee determined to base the achievement of the Performance Bonus on our EBITDA because this metric provides a basis for measuring our operating performance and profitability without regard to the impact of our capital structure, the effect of operating in different tax jurisdictions and the impact of our asset base.

The amount of the Performance Bonus for each of our Named Executive Officers is as follows: (i) for Mr. Stupp, $200,000 at 100% achievement, with a minimum bonus of $50,000 at 80% achievement and a maximum bonus of $350,000 at 120% achievement (with linear interpolation between 80% and 120% achievement); (ii) for Mr. Siegel, 30% of his then‑current base salary at 100% achievement, with a minimum bonus of 20% of his then‑current base salary at 80% achievement and a maximum bonus of 40% of his then‑current base salary at 120% achievement (with linear interpolation between 80% and 120% achievement); and (iii) for Mr. Brink, $127,500 at 100% achievement, with a minimum bonus of $85,000 at 80% achievement and a maximum bonus of $170,000 at 120% achievement (with linear interpolation between 80% and 120% achievement). If our EBITDA for a fiscal year is less than 80% of the EBITDA target included in the budget approved by the Board for the fiscal year (and taking into account any Board approved adjustments to the budgeted EBITDA as described above), then none of Messrs. Stupp, Siegel and Brink are entitled to any Performance Bonus for that fiscal year.

Pension Benefits, Non‑Qualified Defined Contribution and Other Deferred Compensation Plans

We do not have any plans that provide for pension payments or other benefits to our Named Executive Officers at, following or in connection with their retirement. We also do not have any non‑qualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation plans that provide for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax‑qualified.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Mr. Stupp

Pursuant to Mr. Stupp’s amended employment agreement with us, if we terminate Mr. Stupp’s employment other than for cause, death or disability, if Mr. Stupp’s employment contract is not renewed, or if Mr. Stupp terminates his employment for good reason, then Mr. Stupp would be entitled to receive:

an amount equal to six months of his then-current base salary, or twelve months of his then current base salary under certain circumstances subsequent to a change in control of the Company;

a cash payment in an amount equal to any earned but unpaid bonuses;

an amount equal to the average Performance Bonuses paid to Mr. Stupp for the prior two completed fiscal years, payable in a lump sum within 60 days following the termination of Mr. Stupp’s employment;

cash payments in an amount equal to the cost of Mr. Stupp’s healthcare coverage under COBRA for the duration of his severance payment period; and

accelerated vesting of the equity awards held by Mr. Stupp at the time of the termination.

65


Table of Contents

Mr. Stupp would only be entitled to receive the foregoing benefits if, among other things, he executed, delivered and did not revoke a general release of claims in favor of our Company.

For purposes of the Mr. Stupp’s employment agreement:

“cause” means Mr. Stupp: (i) is indicted or charged with a felony or crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or physical harm to any person; (ii) willfully engages in conduct that is in bad faith and materially injurious to our Company; (iii) commits a material breach of the employment agreement, which willbreach is not cured within 20 days after written notice; (iv) willfully refuses to implement or follow a lawful policy of our Company, which breach is not cured within 20 days after written notice; or (v) engages in misfeasance or malfeasance demonstrated by a pattern of failure to perform job duties diligently and professionally; and

“good reason” means, subject to certain notice and other requirements, certain cure periods and certain other limitations as described in the employment agreement, (i) the assignment to Mr. Stupp of any duties inconsistent with his position, duties, responsibilities or status with our Company or a reduction of his duties or responsibilities; (ii) Mr. Stupp no longer reports directly to the Board; (iii) a reduction in Mr. Stupp’s base salary or bonus opportunities; (iv) the requirement that Mr. Stupp be filedbased at any office or location more than 50 miles from our corporate headquarters, except for travel reasonably required in the performance of Mr. Stupp’s responsibilities; or (v) material breach by us of our material obligations under the employment agreement or any other agreement with Mr. Stupp.

Mr. Siegel

Pursuant to Mr. Siegel’s employment agreement with us, if we terminate Mr. Siegel’s employment at any time other than for cause, by death or by disability, then Mr. Siegel would be entitled to receive an amount equal to 12 months of his then‑current base salary, payable in the form of salary continuation, plus any earned but unpaid compensation and benefits for the respective periods.

The employment agreement also provides that Mr. Siegel would be entitled to receive certain payments if we undergo a change in control or if we terminate Mr. Siegel’s employment or eliminate Mr. Siegel’s position in connection with a change in control, as follows:

if we terminate Mr. Siegel’s employment without cause or eliminate Mr. Siegel’s position within three months before or 12 months after a change in control, then Mr. Siegel would be entitled to receive: (i) an amount equal to 12 months of his then-current base salary, payable in the form of salary continuation; (ii) any guaranteed or earned but unpaid bonus amount, payable as a lump sum; and (iii) continuation of Mr. Siegel’s medical and dental benefits under COBRA for 12 months; and

if we undergo a change in control or we terminate Mr. Siegel’s employment without cause or eliminate Mr. Siegel’s position within three months before a change in control, then Mr. Siegel would also be entitled to acceleration of vesting of all equity awards held by Mr. Siegel as of the time of the change in control.

Mr. Siegel would only be entitled to receive the foregoing benefits if, among other things, he executed, delivered and did not revoke a general release of claims in favor of our Company. Mr. Siegel would not be entitled to any severance if his employment is terminated by death or by disability or if his employment is terminated by him for any reason other than as described above.

For purposes of Mr. Siegel’s employment agreement:

“cause” means Mr. Siegel: (i) is convicted of or pleads guilty to a felony or crime involving moral turpitude; (ii) is personally dishonest in a manner that directly affects our Company; (iii) engages in willful misconduct or gross negligence; (iv) breaches a fiduciary duty to our Company; (v) commits an act of fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation against our Company; or (vi) fails to substantially perform his duties as the President and Chief Operating Officer of our Company; and

a “change in control” means the sale, transfer, merger or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets or stock of our Company, by way of contribution, reorganization, share exchange, stock purchase or sale, asset purchase or sale, or other form of corporate transaction.

66


Table of Contents

Mr. Brink

Pursuant to Mr. Brink’s employment agreement with us, if we terminate Mr. Brink’s employment at any time other than for cause, by death or by disability, then Mr. Brink would be entitled to receive an amount equal to 12 months of Mr. Brink’s then-current base salary, in any case payable in the form of salary continuation or in a lump sum at our discretion.

The employment agreement also provides that, if we terminate Mr. Brink’s employment without cause or eliminate Mr. Brink’s position or if Mr. Brink terminates his employment for good reason, in any case within 12 months of a change in control, then Mr. Brink would be entitled to receive: (i) an amount equal to 12 months of his then-current base salary, payable in a lump sum; (ii) any guaranteed or earned but unpaid bonus amount, payable as a lump sum; (iii) continuation of Mr. Brink’s medical and dental benefits under COBRA for 12 months; and (iv) accelerated vesting of the equity awards held by Mr. Brink at the time of the change in control.

Mr. Brink would only be entitled to receive the foregoing benefits if, among other things, he executed, delivered and did not revoke a general release of claims in favor of our Company. Mr. Brink would not be entitled to any severance if his employment is terminated by death or by disability or if his employment is terminated by him for any reason other than as described above.

For purposes of Mr. Brink’s employment agreement:

“cause” means Mr. Brink: (i) is convicted of or pleads guilty to a felony or crime involving moral turpitude; (ii) is personally dishonest in a manner that directly affects our Company; (iii) engages in willful misconduct or gross negligence; (iv) breaches a fiduciary duty to our Company; (v) commits an act of fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation against our Company; or (vi) fails to substantially perform his duties as the Chief Financial Officer of our Company;

“good reason” means, , subject to certain notice and other requirements, certain cure periods and certain other limitations as described in the employment agreement, (i) a material reduction in Mr. Brink’s duties or responsibilities without his express written consent; (ii) a material, uncured breach by us of our obligations under the employment agreement; or (iii) a relocation of Mr. Brink’s principal place of work to a facility more than 100 miles from our current headquarters for a period of more than 180 days; and

a “change in control” means, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any person becomes the beneficial owner of securities of our Company representing more than 50% of the combined voting power of such securities; (ii) during any 12‑month period, the individuals who constitute the Board cease to constitute at least a majority thereof; (iii) a merger or consolidation of our Company with any other entity; or (iv) a complete liquidation or dissolution of our Company or the consummation of a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets.

Director Compensation Program

We use cash and equity compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our board of directors (the “Board”). In setting non‑employee director compensation, we consider the significant amount of time that our directors spend in fulfilling their duties to our Company, as well as the level of experience and skills required of the members of the Board. In addition, we consider how director independence may be affected by director compensation and perquisite types and levels. Directors who are our employees receive no additional compensation for their service as directors.

Each non‑employee director receives the following annual compensation for service on our Board and our Board committees:

Amount

($)

Board Compensation:

All non-employee directors

100,000

Chair Compensation:(1)

Chairman of the Board

25,000

Audit Committee Chair

10,000

(1)

Chairman of the Board and Audit Committee Chair compensation is in addition to the compensation paid to all non-employee directors.

67


Table of Contents

In order to provide members of the Board with the SEC no later than 120opportunity to increase their ownership of our capital stock and thereby more closely align their interests with those of our stockholders, each director is entitled to elect to receive equity awards for all or a portion of his or her annual compensation for Board service, as described above. The director compensation program requires at least 50% of each director’s compensation to be paid in equity.  Each director is entitled to elect quarterly the percentage of their compensation to be paid in equity, between 50% to 100%, and the equity award is granted based on the closing price of our common stock two days after the closeCompany publishes its quarterly earnings.

Director Compensation Table

The following table provides information about the compensation of the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.our non‑employee directors for Fiscal 2020. Mr. Stupp, our Chief Executive Officer, is not included in this table because he is an employee of our Company and receives no additional compensation for his service as a director. The compensation received by Mr. Stupp as an employee of our Company is described under “Executive Compensation” above.

 

 

Fees Earned or

 

 

Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid in Cash

 

 

Awards

 

 

Total

 

Name

 

($)

 

 

($)(1)

 

 

($)

 

Evan Hengel (2)

 

 

 

 

 

116,250

 

 

 

116,250

 

Dwight Mamanteo

 

 

 

 

 

102,278

 

 

 

102,278

 

Jess Ravich

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

Patti Johnson (3)

 

 

 

 

 

84,944

 

 

 

84,944

 

Henry Stupp

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts represent, (a) for all non-employee directors, the grant date fair value of awards granted computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (for more information, see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report).

(2)

Mr. Hengel was appointed Chairman of the Board on June 10, 2019.  As a result, he earned pro-rated amounts of annual compensation based on his partial year of service as Chairman of the Board in Fiscal 2020

(3)

Ms. Johnson was appointed to the Board and Chair of the Audit Committee on April 26, 2019.  As a result, she earned pro-rated amounts of annual compensation based on her partial year of service in Fiscal 2020

Item 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information requiredfollowing table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by, this Item is incorporated hereinand percentage ownership of, the following:

each stockholder known by referenceus to beneficially own more than 5% of the information to be containedoutstanding shares of our common stock;

each current director and director nominee;

each of our Named Executive Officers; and

all of our current executive officers and directors as a group.

68


Table of Contents

We have determined beneficial ownership in the Proxy Statement or an amendment to this Annual Report, either of which will be filedaccordance with the SEC no later than 120rules of the SEC. Under such rules, a person’s beneficial ownership includes any shares the person has the right to acquire as of or within 60 days after the closemeasurement date, through the exercise or conversion of any outstanding stock options, warrants or other rights or the vesting of any outstanding RSUs. Such shares that a person has the right to acquire are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated in the notes to the table below, to our knowledge, all persons named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares of our common stock identified as beneficially owned by them, except to the extent authority is shared by spouses under applicable community property laws. All ownership percentages in the table below are based on 5,570,059 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2020 and, unless otherwise indicated in the notes to the table below, all information is presented as of March 31, 2020. We have reviewed all Schedule 13D and Schedule 13G filings as of March 31, 2020.  On September 27, 2019, the Company effected a one-for-three reverse stock split of its common stock.  All share amounts in the table below and related footnotes have been revised to reflect the reverse stock split.

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount of

Beneficial

Ownership

(#)

 

 

Percentage

of Class

(%)

 

5% Stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CSC(1)

 

 

1,396,353

 

 

 

24.7

 

NorthPointe Capital, LLC(2)

 

 

449,061

 

 

 

8.1

 

Gordon Brothers Parties(3)

 

 

495,110

 

 

 

8.2

 

Current Non-Employee Directors and Director Nominees:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evan Hengel

 

 

28,993

 

 

*

 

Dwight Mamanteo

 

 

90,251

 

 

 

1.6

 

Patti Johnson

 

 

1,381

 

 

*

 

Jess Ravich(4)

 

 

589,572

 

 

 

10.3

 

Named Executive Officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Henry Stupp

 

 

92,919

 

 

 

1.7

 

Howard Siegel

 

 

47,433

 

 

*

 

Steven Brink

 

 

62,111

 

 

 

1.1

 

All current executive officers and directors as a

   group (7 persons)(5)

 

 

912,661

 

 

 

15.8

 

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%, based on shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2020.

(1)

The number of shares reported as beneficially owned is based solely on a Schedule 13D/A, which was revised to reflect the reverse stock split referred to above, with a reporting date of September 23, 2019 filed with the SEC by CSC and Jeffrey Bronchick, the Portfolio Manager and Founder of CSC. Of such shares, (i) CSC has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 0 shares and shared voting power with respect to 1,388,019 shares, and (ii) Mr. Bronchick has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 8,333 shares, shared voting power with respect to 1,185,579 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,396,352 shares. The number of shares reported as beneficially owned by these persons includes 123,450 shares of our common stock subject to warrants exercisable as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2019. CSC reports its principal business address as 2101 E. El Segundo Boulevard, Suite 302, El Segundo, California 90245. These shares have been divided by 3 for the reverse stock split that occurred on September 27, 2019.

(2)

The number of shares reported as beneficially owned is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A, which was revised to reflect the reverse stock split referred to above, with a reporting date of December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC by NorthPointe, LLC. Of such shares, NorthPointe Capital, LLC has sole voting power with respect to 414,560 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 449,061 shares.  NorthPointe Capital, LLC reports its principal business address as 39400 Woodward Ave, Suite 190, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304. These shares have been divided by 3 for the reverse stock split that occurred on September 27, 2019.

(3)

The number of shares reported as beneficially owned is based on (i) a Schedule 13G, which was revised to reflect the reverse stock split referred to above, with a reporting date of August 3, 2018 filed with the SEC by Gordon Brothers Brands, LLC (“GBB”) and Gordon Brothers Group, LLC (“GBG”), which such shares represent an immediately exercisable warrant to purchase 265,110 shares of our common stock held by GBB as of August 3, 2018 (the “Reported Shares”), and (ii) our issuance on January 29, 2018 to GBB of warrants to purchase 230,000 shares of our common stock.  Of the Reported Shares, GBB and GBG report that each of GBB and GBG has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 265,110 shares. GBB and GBG report their principal business address as Prudential Tower, 800 Boylston Street, 27th Floor, Boston, MA 02199. These shares have been divided by 3 for the reverse stock split that occurred on September 27, 2019.

69


Table of Contents

(4)

Includes 126,966 shares of our common stock held of record by a trust of which Mr. Ravich is the sole trustee, 48,154 shares of our common stock subject to warrants held by such trust and exercisable as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2020, and 21,403 shares of our common stock  held directly by Mr. Ravich.

(5)

Includes shares beneficially owned by all current executive officers and directors as a group, including warrants held by a trust in which Mr. Ravich is the sole trustee as further specified in note 4 above.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

We currently maintain one equity compensation plan, the Apex Global Brands Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”).  All of our outstanding options and unvested RSUs were granted under the 2013 Plan.  The 2013 Plan became effective upon its approval by our stockholders on July 16, 2013, and was amended and restated upon the approval of our stockholders on June 6, 2016 and then again on June 10, 2019.

Share Reserve, Share Counting and Other Share Limits

The maximum number of shares of Company common stock with respect to which awards may be granted under the 2013 Plan is 600,000 shares initially reserved for issuance under the 2013 Plan and 157,496 shares previously reserved but unissued under the previous plans approved by our stockholders.

Any shares covered by an award which is forfeited, cancelled or expires will be deemed not to have been issued for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares which may be issued under the 2013 Plan. Shares that have been issued under the 2013 Plan pursuant to an award will not be returned to the 2013 Plan and will not become available for future grant under the 2013 Plan, except where unvested shares are forfeited or repurchased by the Company at the lower of their original purchase price or their fair market value. Shares tendered or withheld in payment of an award exercise or purchase price and shares withheld by the Company to pay any tax withholding obligation and shares purchased in the open market with proceeds of a stock option exercise price will not be returned to the 2013 Plan and will not become available for future issuance under the 2013 Plan. In addition, all shares covered by the portion of a stock appreciation right that is exercised will be considered issued pursuant to the 2013 Plan.

With respect to stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and RSUs that are intended to be performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), the maximum number of shares subject to such awards that may be granted to a participant during any calendar year is 33,333 shares, subject to adjustment in the event of a future change in our shares or our capital structure.

Administration

The 2013 Plan is administered by the Board or one or more committees designated by the Board.  The Compensation Committee currently acts as the administrator of the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.2013 Plan.  With respect to award grants to officers and directors, the Compensation Committee will be constituted in such a manner as to satisfy applicable laws, including Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

Eligibility

Persons eligible to receive awards under the 2013 Plan include directors, officers and other employees, consultants and advisors of our Company or any of its subsidiaries.

Types and Terms of Awards

The 2013 Plan authorizes the grant of a variety of types of awards, including non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, dividend equivalent rights, stock appreciation rights and cash-based awards.  All awards under the 2013 Plan may be granted with such vesting schedules and other terms as the administrator of the 2013 Plan may determine in its discretion, subject to the provisions and limitations of the plan.  Although the 2013 Plan provides the administrator with such discretion, stock option and RSU awards granted to employees under the 2013 Plan typically vest in equal annual installments over two, three or five years beginning on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued service through each vesting date and, to the extent specified in an award agreement, accelerated vesting under certain circumstances, and awards granted under the 2013 Plan that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation typically vest upon the satisfaction of one or more performance goals established by the plan administrator at or around the time the award is granted.

70


Table of Contents

Treatment of Awards upon Corporate Transaction

The 2013 Plan provides that, in the event of a Corporate Transaction (as defined in the 2013 Plan), all outstanding awards under the 2013 Plan will terminate unless the awards are assumed in connection with the Corporate Transaction. Except as provided in an individual award agreement, for the portion of each award that is neither assumed nor replaced, such portion of the award will automatically become fully vested and exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at fair market value) for all of the shares (or other consideration) at the time represented by such portion of the award, immediately prior to the specified effective date of such Corporate Transaction, provided that the grantee’s continuous service has not terminated prior to such date.

Under the 2013 Plan, a Corporate Transaction includes, in general: (i) a person’s or group’s acquisition of more than 50% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities, (ii) certain changes to the composition of our Board of Directors, (iii) the consummation by the Company of certain mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, business combinations, asset sales or acquisitions, and (iv) a stockholder-approved liquidation or dissolutions of the Company.

Amendment, Suspension and Termination

The 2013 Plan will terminate on April 11, 2029, unless earlier terminated by the Board. The Board may at any time amend, suspend or terminate the 2013 Plan, subject to obtaining stockholder approval for any amendment to the extent necessary to comply with applicable laws and rules.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information as of February 1, 2020 about compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance :

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

securities to be

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

securities

 

 

 

 

issued upon

 

 

Weighted-average

 

 

 

remaining

 

 

 

 

exercise of

 

 

exercise price of

 

 

 

available for

 

 

 

 

outstanding

 

 

outstanding

 

 

 

future issuance

 

 

 

 

options,

 

 

options,

 

 

 

under equity

 

 

Plan category

 

warrants and rights

(#)

 

 

warrants and rights

($)

 

 

 

compensation plans

(#)

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

 

212,831

 

 

 

11.94

 

(1)

 

 

90,423

 

(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security

   holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

212.831

 

 

 

11.94

 

 

 

 

90,423

 

 

(1)

Excludes RSU and performance stock unit awards, which have no associated exercise price.

(2)

Represents shares reserved and available for future awards that may be granted under the 2013 Plan.

Item 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this ItemFiscal 2020 Related Party Transactions

Except as described below and except for employment arrangements and compensation for Board service, which are described under “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” above, since February 2, 2019, there has not been, nor is incorporated herein by reference to the informationthere currently proposed, any transaction or series of transactions in which we were or are to be containeda participant in which the Proxy Statementamount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or an amendment to this Annual Report, either of which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the closeone percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information to be containedyears, and in the Proxy Statementwhich any of our directors, executive officers, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock or an amendment to this Annual Report, eitherany immediate family member of which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the closeany of the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.foregoing had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

89


 

On August 3, 2018, we entered into a senior secured credit facility with Gordon Brothers Finance Company (“Gordon Brothers”), as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders from time to time party thereto, pursuant to which we

71


Table of Contents

borrowed $40.0 million under a term loan facility. Also on August 3, 2018, we entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with (i) Jess Ravich, a member of the Board, (ii) Henry Stupp, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board, and (iii) CSC (together with certain affiliates and funds of CSC), our largest stockholder.  Under the Exchange Agreement, the former junior participants under our former credit facility with Cerberus exchanged their junior participation interests (together with approximately $2.0 million of additional cash consideration provided by CSC) for new Subordinated Exchange Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $13.5 million (the “Junior Notes”).  The Junior Notes bear interest, through August 2, 2019, at a rate equal to the LIBOR Rate plus a margin of 8.75%.  Thereafter, the Junior Notes bear interest at a rate equal to the LIBOR Rate plus a margin of (x) 8.25% if we have a trailing 12-month consolidated EBITDA greater than $15 million, (y) 8.50% if we have a trailing 12-month consolidated EBITDA between $10 million and $15 million, or (z) 8.75% if we have a trailing 12-month consolidated EBITDA of less than $10 million.  The borrowings under the credit facility with Gordon Brothers together with the exchange under the Exchange Agreement resulted in the repayment of all amounts due under the Cerberus credit facility.  The related party investors in the Junior Notes comprise (i) CSC or its affiliates, a large stockholder, with $9.0 million of principal under Junior Notes; (ii) Jess Ravich, director and large stockholders, with $4.4 million of principal under Junior Notes; and (iii) Henry Stupp, Chief Executive Officer, with $0.1 million of principal under Junior Notes.

On December 28, 2018, we entered into certain subordinated notes (the “Subordinated Notes”) in favor of lenders (i) Jess Ravich, a member of the Board, (ii) CSC and Jeff Bronchick, Lead Principal Portfolio Manager of CSC, our largest stockholder, and (iii) Dwight Mamanteo, a member of the Board, pursuant to which we borrowed an aggregate of $2.0 Million. On January 30, 2019, we entered into a second amendment to our senior secured credit facility with Gordon Brothers, as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders from time to time party thereto, to borrow an additional $5.3 million under the credit facility (the “Additional Term Loan”). A portion of the net proceeds from the Additional Term Loan were used to repay the $2.0 Million of Subordinated Notes. As of the end of Fiscal 2019, the Subordinated Notes have been paid in full and cancelled.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers.  These agreements generally require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their director and/or executive officer positions with our Company.

Policies and Procedures for Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions

Pursuant to the terms of the written charter of the Audit Committee and in accordance with applicable Nasdaq rules, our policy is to require that any transaction with a related party required to be reported under applicable SEC rules, other than compensation‑related matters and waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, be reviewed and approved or ratified by our Audit Committee (if such transactions are not reviewed or overseen by another independent body of the Board). In accordance with this policy, each of the Ravich Loan, the Private Placement and the Junior Participation Purchases has been reviewed and approved or ratified by an independent body of our Board. We have not adopted formal written procedures for the review, or standards for the approval, of these transactions; rather, our Audit Committee reviews each such transaction on a case‑by‑case basis and generally focuses on whether the terms of the transaction are at least as favorable to us as terms we would receive on an arm’s‑length basis from an unaffiliated third party.

Director Independence

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Mamanteo, Mr. Ravich and Ms. Johnson is an independent director within the meaning of applicable rules of Nasdaq.  Also, the Board of Directors determined that Mr. Hengel is an independent director within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq rules except for purposes of membership on the audit committee.

72


Table of Contents

PART IVItem 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

The following table shows the aggregate fees billed to us for professional services rendered by Deloitte in Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019:

 

 

Fiscal 2020

 

 

Fiscal 2019

 

Audit Fees (1)

 

$

 

518,000

 

 

$

 

755,000

 

Audit-Related Fees (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

 

518,000

 

 

$

 

755,000

 

(1)

Audit fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of our annual consolidated financial statements (including services related to the audit of our internal control over financial reporting) and review of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports, professional services rendered in connection with our filing of various registration statements (such as registration statements on Form S‑8 and Form S‑3, including related comfort letters) and other services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)

Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported as audit fees. No such services were rendered for us in Fiscal 2020 or Fiscal 2019.

(3)

Tax fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. No such services were rendered for us in Fiscal 2020 or Fiscal 2019.

(4)

All other fees consist of fees billed for products and services other than the services described in notes (1), (2) and (3) above. No such services were rendered for us in Fiscal 2020 or Fiscal 2019.

Pre‑Approval Policies and Procedures

Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee annually reviews and pre‑approves all audit and permissible non‑audit services that may be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and establishes a pre‑approved aggregate fee level for all of these services, subject to exceptions for certain “de minimus” services and amounts in accordance with applicable SEC rules. Any proposed service not included within the list of pre‑approved services or any proposed service that will cause us to exceed the pre‑approved aggregate fee level requires specific pre‑approval by the Audit Committee. All of the services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firms during Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019 were pre‑approved by the Audit Committee.

73


Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1)

A list of the financial statements included hereinin and filed as part of this Annual Report is includedset forth in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, of Part II of this Annual Report.“Financial Statements” and is incorporated herein by reference.

(2)

Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.thereto included in this Annual Report.

(3)

The information required by this Item 15(a)(3) is set forth on the exhibit indexExhibit Index that immediately followsprecedes the signature page to this Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 16.  FORM 10-K SUMMARY

We have elected not to provide summary information.

74

90


EXHIBIT INDEX

SIGNATURES

Exhibit

Number

Description of Exhibit

2.1

+

Asset Purchase Agreement, by and among Cherokee Inc., Hawk 900 Brands LLC, Hawk Designs, Inc. and Quiksilver, Inc., dated as of January 10, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated January 10, 2014).

2.2

+

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 13, 2015, by and among Cherokee Inc., FFS Merger Sub LLC, FFS Holdings, LLC and Darin Kraetsch, solely in his capacity as the representative of the FFS Holdings, LLC equityholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2015).

2.3

+

Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2016, by and among Sunningdale Corporation Limited, Irene Acquisition Company B.V., and Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

2.4

+

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2016, by and among Hi-Tec Sports USA, Inc., Irene Acquisition Company B.V., Cherokee Inc. and Carolina Footwear Group, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

2.5

+

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2016, by and among Hi-Tec Sports UK Limited, Hi-Tec Sports PLC, Hi-Tec Nederland B.V., Hi-Tec Sport France SAS, Irene Acquisition Company B.V. and Batra Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 28, 2000).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated June 22, 2011).

4.1

Warrant to Purchase 120,000 Shares of Common Stock issued November 28, 2016 by Cherokee Inc. to Carolina Footwear Group LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

4.2

Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock, issued on August 11, 2017 by Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8-K dated August 14, 2017).

4.3

Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock, issued on December 7, 2017 by Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 28, 2017).

4.4

Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 3, 2018, by and between the Company and Gordon Brothers Finance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

4.5

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

4.6

Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 3, 2018, by and between the Company and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

4.7

Form of Junior Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

10.1

#

Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated June 5, 2012).

10.2

#

The 2006 Incentive Award Plan of Cherokee Inc. (restating the 2003 Incentive Award Plan) (incorporated by reference to Annex A to Cherokee’s Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on May 1, 2006).

10.3

#

Amendment No. 1 to the 2006 Incentive Award Plan of Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2010).

10.4

#

Form of Employee Option Agreement under the 2006 Incentive Award Plan of Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2001).

10.5

#

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2006 Incentive Award Plan of Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated June 18, 2012).

10.6

#

Form of Performance‑Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2006 Incentive Award Plan of Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended May 4, 2013).

10.7

#

Cherokee Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2016).

75


Table of Contents

10.8

#

Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Cherokee Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended August 3, 2013).

10.9

#

Amendment to Stock Option Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2012, by and between Cherokee and Henry Stupp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended July 28, 2012).

10.10

#

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 11, 2016, between Cherokee Inc. and Henry Stupp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated July 14, 2016).

10.11

#

Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2013, by and between Cherokee Inc. and Jason Boling (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Cherokee’s Registration Statement No. 333‑190795 on Form S‑8 filed with the Commission on August 23, 2013).

10.12

Office Lease, by and between Tri‑Center Plaza, LP and Cherokee Inc., dated as of September 30, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated October 13, 2011).

10.13

Amendment to Office Lease, by and between KW Tricenter, LLC and Cherokee Inc., dated as of December 5, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014).

10.14

#

Employment Agreement, dated July 23, 2015, between Cherokee Inc. and Howard Siegel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated July 29, 2015).

10.15

Second Amendment to Office Lease, by and between KW Tricenter, LLC and Cherokee Inc., dated as of February 29, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016).

10.16

Financing Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2016, by and among Cherokee Inc., Irene Acquisition Company B.V., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as Collateral Agent and Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

10.17

Amendment No. 1 to Financing Agreement, dated August 11, 2017 and effective August 11, 2017, by and among Cherokee Inc., Irene Acquisition Company B.V., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as Collateral Agent and Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated August 14, 2017).

10.18

Amendment No. 2 to Financing Agreement, dated November 10, 2017 and effective December 7, 2017, by and among Cherokee Inc., Irene Acquisition Company B.V., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as Collateral Agent and Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated November 13, 2017).

10.19

Promissory Note, dated as of December 7, 2016, executed by Irene Acquisition Company B.V. in favor of Ravich Revocable Trust of 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

10.20

First Amendment to Promissory Note, dated as of June 5, 2017, by and between Irene Acquisition Company B.V. and Ravich Revocable Trust of 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended April 29, 2017).

10.21

Second Amendment to Promissory Note, dated August 11, 2017, by and between Irene Acquisition Company B.V. and Ravich Revocable Trust of 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated August 14, 2017).

10.22

Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement between Cherokee Inc. and the investor named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8 ‑ K dated August 14, 2017).

10.23

#

Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated October 30, 2017, between Cherokee Inc. and Henry Stupp (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 of Cherokee’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018).

10.24

#

Offer Letter Agreement, dated December 13, 2017, by and between Cherokee Inc. and Steven L. Brink (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.24 of Cherokee’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018).

10.25

#

Separation and Release Letter Agreement, dated December 13, 2017, by and between Cherokee Inc. and Jason Boling (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.25 of Cherokee’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018).

10.26

Financing Agreement, dated August 3, 2018, by and between the Company, Gordon Brothers Finance Company and additional parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

76


Table of Contents

10.27

Pledge and Security Agreement, dated August 3, 2018, by and between the Company and Gordon Brothers Finance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

10.28

Subordinated Exchange Note, dated August 3, 2018, by and between the Company and Cove Street Capital Small Cap Value Fund (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

10.29

Subordinated Exchange Note, dated August 3, 2018, by and between the Company and Henry I. Stupp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

10.30

Subordinated Exchange Note, dated August 3, 2018, by and between the Company and Ravich Revocable Trust of 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

10.31

Subordinated Exchange Note, dated August 3, 2018, by and between the Company and Square Deal Growth, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Cherokee’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4, 2018).

10.32

First Amendment to Financing Agreement, dated December 28, 2018, by and between the Company, Gordon Brothers Finance Company and additional parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of APEX’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended February 2, 2019).

10.33

Subordinated Note, dated December 28, 2018, by and between the Company and Jess Ravich (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of APEX’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended February 2, 2019).

10.34

Subordinated Note, dated December 28, 2018, by and between the Company and the Bronchick Family Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of APEX’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended February 2, 2019).

10.35

Subordinated Note, dated December 28, 2018, by and between the Company and Square Deal Growth, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of APEX’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended February 2, 2019).

10.36

Subordinated Note, dated December 28, 2018, by and between the Company and Dwight Mamanteo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of APEX’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended February 2, 2019).

10.37

Second Amendment to Financing Agreement, dated January 30, 2019, by and between the Company, Gordon Brothers Finance Company and additional parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of APEX’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended February 2, 2019).

10.38

#*

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated October 25, 2019, by and between the Company and Henry Stupp.

14.1

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by Apex Global Brands Inc. This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as applied to our principal financial officers, shall be our “code of ethics” within the meaning of Section 406 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated thereunder and, as applied to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers, shall be our “code of ethics” within the meaning of Item 406 of Regulation S‑K (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004).

16.1

Letter, dated August 25, 2017, from Ernst & Young LLP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8-K dated August 25, 2017).

21.1

*

Subsidiaries of APEX Global Brands Inc.

23.1

*

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

24.1

*

Power of Attorney (included on the signature page hereto).

31.1

*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002.

31.2

*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002.

32.1

**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002.

32.2

**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002.

101

*

The following materials from Cherokee’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

*

Filed herewith.

**

Furnished herewith.

#

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

+

Schedules and exhibits omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S‑K promulgated by the SEC. The Company has agreed to furnish a supplemental copy of any omitted schedules or exhibits to the SEC upon request.

77


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

Date: April 30, 2020

Cherokee Inc.APEX GLOBAL BRANDS INC.

 

 

 

 

By

/s/ HENRY STUPP

 

 

Henry Stupp

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 18, 2017

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Henry Stupp and Jason Boling,Steven L. Brink, and each of them individually, as his true and lawful attorneys‑in‑fact and agents with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to any or all amendments to this Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys‑in‑fact and agents or any of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the foregoing, as full to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys‑in‑fact and agents or any of them, or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

Signature

    

Title

    

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ HENRY STUPP

 

Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

May 18, 2017April 30, 2020

Henry Stupp

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ JASON BOLINGSTEVEN L. BRINK

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

May 18, 2017April 30, 2020

Jason BolingSteven L. Brink

 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ JESS RAVICH

 

ChairmanDirector

 

May 18, 2017April 30, 2020

Jess Ravich

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ SUSAN E. ENGELPATTI JOHNSON

 

Director

 

May 18, 2017April 30, 2020

Susan E. EngelPatti Johnson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ CAROL BAIOCCHIDWIGHT MAMANTEO

 

Director

 

May 18, 2017April 30, 2020

Carol BaiocchiDwight Mamanteo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ KEITH HULLEVAN HENGEL

 

Director

 

May 18, 2017April 30, 2020

Keith HullEvan Hengel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ ROBERT GALVIN

Director

May 18, 2017

Robert Galvin

/s/ FRANK TWORECKE

Director

May 18, 2017

Frank Tworecke

 

78

91


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

2.1

+

Asset Purchase Agreement, by and among Cherokee Inc., Hawk 900 Brands LLC, Hawk Designs, Inc. and Quiksilver, Inc., dated as of January 10, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated January 10, 2014).

2.2

+

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 13, 2015, by and among Cherokee Inc., FFS Merger Sub LLC, FFS Holdings, LLC and Darin Kraetsch, solely in his capacity as the representative of the FFS Holdings, LLC equityholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2015).

2.3

+

Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 29 2016, by and among Sunningdale Corporation Limited, Irene Acquisition Company B.V., and Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

2.4

+

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2016, by and among Hi-Tec Sports USA, Inc., Irene Acquisition Company B.V., Cherokee Inc. and Carolina Footwear Group, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

2.5

+

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2016, by and among Hi-Tec Sports UK Limited, Hi-Tec Sports PLC, Hi-Tec Nederland B.V., Hi-Tec Sport France SAS, Irene Acquisition Company B.V. and Batra Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 28, 2000).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cherokee Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated June 22, 2011).

4.1

Warrant to Purchase 120,000 Shares of Common Stock issued November 28, 2016 by Cherokee Inc. to Carolina Footwear Group LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

10.1

#

Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated June 5, 2012).

10.2

#

The 2006 Incentive Award Plan (restating the 2003 Incentive Award Plan) (incorporated by reference to Annex A to Cherokee’s Proxy Statement dated April 20, 2006 for its 2006 annual stockholders’ meeting).

10.3

#

Amendment No. 1 to The 2006 Incentive Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2010).

10.4

#

Form of Employee Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2001).

10.5

#

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated June 18, 2012).

10.6

#

Form of Performance‑Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended May 4, 2013).

10.7

#

Cherokee Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2016).

10.8

#

Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended August 3, 2013).

10.9

#

Amendment to Stock Option Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2012, by and between Cherokee and Henry Stupp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended July 28, 2012).

10.10

#

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 11, 2016, between Cherokee Inc. and Henry Stupp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated July 14, 2016).

10.11

#

Offer Letter to Jason Boling, dated February 22, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated February 25, 2013).

92


Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

10.12

#

Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2013, by and between Cherokee Inc. and Jason Boling (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Cherokee’s Registration Statement No. 333‑190795 on Form S‑8 filed with the Commission on August 23, 2013).

10.13

Credit Agreement, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of September 4, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated September 4, 2012).

10.14

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of January 31, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated January 31, 2013).

10.15

Term Note, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of September 4, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated September 4, 2012).

10.16

First Amendment to Term Note, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of January 31, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated January 31, 2013).

10.17

Line of Credit Note, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of September 4, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated September 4, 2012).

10.18

Continuing Security Agreement, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of September 4, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated September 4, 2012).

10.19

Trademark Security Agreement, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of September 4, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated September 4, 2012).

10.20

Continuing Guaranty, executed by Spell C. LLC in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of September 4, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated September 4, 2012).

10.21

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of January 10, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated January 10, 2014).

10.22

Second Amendment to Term Note, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of January 10, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated January 10, 2014).

10.23

First Amendment to Line of Credit Note, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of January 10, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated January 10, 2014).

10.24

Term Note B‑1, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., dated as of January 10, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated January 10, 2014).

10.25

Letter Amendment to Retail License Agreement, dated January 7, 2014, by and between Cherokee Inc. and Kohl’s Illinois, Inc., together with: (i) the April 28, 2005 Retail License Agreement, by and between Hawk Designs, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Quiksilver, Inc. (“QS”) and Kohl’s Illinois, Inc. as assignee of Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. (“Kohl’s”); (ii) Amendments to Retail License Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, January 30, 2009 and May 26, 2011, each entered into by and between Kohl’s and QS; (iii) Renewal dated April 1, 2010; and (iv) Assignment dated July 26, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014).

10.26

Office Lease, by and between Tri‑Center Plaza, LP and Cherokee Inc., dated as of September 30, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated October 13, 2011).

10.27

Amendment to Office Lease, by and between KW Tricenter, LLC and Cherokee Inc., dated as of December 5, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014).

93


Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

10.28

#

Employment Agreement, dated July 23, 2015, between Cherokee Inc. and Howard Siegel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 8‑K dated July 29, 2015).

10.29

Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2015).

10.30

Third Amendment to Term Note, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2015).

10.31

Second Amendment to Line of Credit Note, dated as of September 4, 2015, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2015).

10.32

First Amendment to Term Note B-1, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2015).

10.33

Term Note B-2, dated as of October 13, 2015, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2015).

10.34

Second Amendment to Office Lease, by and between KW Tricenter, LLC and Cherokee Inc., dated as of February 29, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016).

10.35

Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of May 27, 2016, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2016).

10.36

Fourth Amendment to Term Note, dated as of May 27, 2016, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2016).

10.37

Third Amendment to Line of Credit Note, dated as of May 27, 2016, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2016).

10.38

Second Amendment to Term Note B-1, dated as of May 27, 2016, by and between Cherokee Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2016).

10.39

First Amendment to Term Note B-2, dated as of May 27, 2016, executed by Cherokee Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2016).

10.40

Financing Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2016, by and among Cherokee Inc., Irene Acquisition Company B.V., the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as Collateral Agent and Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

10.41

Promissory Note, dated as of December 7, 2016, executed by Irene Acquisition Company B.V. in favor of Ravich Revocable Trust of 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑Q for the quarterly period ended October 29, 2016).

14.1

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by Cherokee in March 2004. This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as applied to Cherokee’s principal financial officers, shall be our “code of ethics” within the meaning of Section 406 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated thereunder and, as applied to Cherokee’s principal executive, financial and accounting officers, shall be our “code of ethics” within the meaning of Item 406 of Regulation S‑K (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of Cherokee’s Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004).

21.1

*

Subsidiaries of Cherokee Inc.

23.1

*

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

24.1

*

Power of Attorney (included on the signature page hereto).

31.1

*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.

94


Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

31.2

*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.

101

*

The following materials from Cherokee’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


*

Filed herewith.

**

Furnished herewith.

#

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

+

Schedules and exhibits omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S‑K promulgated by the SEC. The Company has agreed to furnish a supplemental copy of any omitted schedules or exhibits to the SEC upon request.

95