Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172018

 

Commission file number: 0-21039

STRAYERSTRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

MARYLAND

52-1975978

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

2303 Dulles Station Boulevard, Herndon, VA 20171
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER INCLUDING AREA CODE: (703) 247-2500

 

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

 

COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE

NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT MARKET

(Title of class)

(Name of each exchange on which registered)

 

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

NONE

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act: ☑  Yes ☐ No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act:    ☐ Yes ☑ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☑ Yes ☐ No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☑

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

 

 

 

Large accelerated filer

 

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

 

 

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☑ No

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates (computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold) as of June 30, 2017,29, 2018, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $997.6 million.$1.3 billion.

 

The total number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 1, 20182019 was 11,161,266.21,745,913.

 

 

 

 

 


 

Table of Contents

STRAYERSTRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC.

FORM 10-K

INDEX

 

 

    

 

    

Page

PART I 

 

 

 

 

Item 1 

 

Business

 

5

Item 1A 

 

Risk Factors

 

3343

Item 1B 

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

4955

Item 2 

 

Properties

 

4955

Item 3 

 

Legal Proceedings

 

5056

Item 4 

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

 

5056

 

 

 

 

 

PART II 

 

 

 

 

Item 5 

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities

 

5157

Item 6 

 

Selected Financial Data

 

5460

Item 7 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

5561

Item 7A 

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

6672

Item 8 

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

6774

Item 9 

 

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

97114

Item 9A 

 

Controls and Procedures

 

97114

Item 9B 

 

Other Information

 

97115

 

 

 

 

 

PART III 

 

 

 

 

Item 10 

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

99116

Item 11 

 

Executive Compensation

 

103121

Item 12 

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

 

123121

Item 13 

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

125121

Item 14 

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

127121

 

 

 

 

 

PART IV 

 

 

 

 

Item 15 

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

127121

Item 16 

 

Form 10-K Summary

 

128124

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES 

 

133125

 

 

2


 

Table of Contents

PART I

 

CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:

 

This document and the documents incorporated by reference herein include “forward-looking statements,” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including, in particular,without limitation, the statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects under the headings “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business.” We have typically used the words “expect,” “estimate,” “assume,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “will,” “forecast,” “outlook”,“outlook,” “plan,” “project,” and similar expressions in this document and the documents incorporated by reference herein to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to many risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, among other things:

 

·

the pace of growth of student enrollment;

 

·

our continued compliance with Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (the “Higher Education Act” or “HEA”), and the regulations thereunder, as well as other federal laws and regulations, regional accreditation standards, and state regulatory requirements;

 

·

rulemaking by the U.S. Department of Education (“Department of Education” or the “Department”) and increased focus by the U.S. Congress on for-profit education institutions;

 

·

competitive factors;

 

·

risks associated with the opening of new campuses;

 

·

risks associated with the offering of new educational programs and adapting to other changes;

 

·

risks related to the timing of regulatory approvals;

 

·

our ability to continue to implement our growth strategy;

 

·

the risk that our pending merger with Capella may not be completed in a timely manner or at all due to the failure to satisfy other conditions (including obtaining required regulatory and education agency approvals) to completion of the merger;

·

the occurrence of any event, change, or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement with Capella;

·

the outcome of any legal proceeding that may be instituted against Strayer, Capella, and others prior to the consummation of our merger with Capella;

·

the amount of the costs, fees, expenses, and charges related to our pending merger with Capella;Capella (the “Merger”);

 

·

the risk that the benefits of our merger with Capella, including expected synergies, may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected;

 

·

the risk that our merger with Capella may not advance the combined company’s business strategy and growth strategy;

 

3


Table of Contents

·

the risk that the combined company may experience difficulty integrating Strayer’s and Capella’s employees or operations;

 

·

the potential diversion of our management’s attention resulting from our pending merger with Capella;

 

·

risks associated with the ability of our students to finance their education in a timely manner; and

 

·

general economic and market conditions.

 

You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. You should understand that many important factors, including those discussed under the headings “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

3


Table of Contents

and Results of Operations” and “Business,” could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or suggested in any forward-looking statements. Further information about these and other relevant risks and uncertainties may be found in Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission (“SEC”). We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

 

References to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Strayer,” the “Corporation,” and the “Company” refer to StrayerStrategic Education, Inc., together with our consolidated subsidiaries, Strayer University and the New York Code and Design Academy, unless the context suggests otherwise.

 

4


 

Table of Contents

Item 1.      Business

 

Overview

 

OurStrategic Education, Inc. (“Strategic Education,” “SEI,” or the “Company”), a Maryland corporation formerly known as Strayer Education, Inc., is an education services company provides a variety ofthat seeks to provide the most direct path between learning and employment through campus-based and online post-secondary education and other academicofferings, as well as through programs to develop job-ready skills for high-demand markets. The Company conducts its operations primarily through twoits wholly-owned subsidiaries, Strayer University (the “University”and Capella University, both accredited post-secondary institutions of higher education. The Company’s operations also include certain non-degree programs, mainly focused on software and application development. 

Acquisition of Capella Education Company

On August 1, 2018, we completed our merger with Capella Education Company (“CEC”pursuant to a merger agreement dated October 29, 2017. The merger solidifies our position as a national leader in education innovation, and provides scale that will enable greater investment in improving student academic and career outcomes while maintaining our focus on affordability. The merger is also expected to create significant cost synergies for us.

Pursuant to the merger, we issued 0.875 shares of our common stock for each issued and outstanding share of CEC common stock. Outstanding equity awards held by CEC employees and certain nonemployee directors of CEC were assumed by us and converted into comparable SEI awards at the exchange ratio. Outstanding equity awards held by CEC nonemployee directors who did not serve as directors of SEI after completion of the merger and awards held by former employees of CEC who left before completion of the merger were settled upon completion of the merger as specified in the merger agreement.

As of December 31, 2018, our segments and wholly-owned subsidiaries consisted of the following:

Strayer University Segment

Strayer University is an institution of higher learning that offers undergraduate and graduate degree programs in business administration, accounting, information technology, education, health services administration, public administration, and criminal justice at physical campuses, predominantly located in the eastern United States, and online.

The Jack Welch Management Institute (“JWMI”), a program of Strayer University, offers an executive MBA online and is a Top-25 Princeton Review-ranked online MBA program.

Capella University Segment

Capella University is an online post-secondary education company that offers a variety of bachelor's, master's and doctoral degree programs primarily delivered to working adults. Capella University’s program offerings span six primary disciplines: public service leadership; nursing and health sciences; psychology; business and technology; counseling and human services; and education.

Non-Degree Programs Segment

DevMountain, LLC (“DevMountain”) is a software development school offering Web Development, iOS Development, and UX Design programs in person at DevMountain’s classrooms in Provo and Salt Lake City, Utah, Dallas, Texas, and Phoenix, Arizona, and online.

Hackbright Academy, Inc. (“Hackbright”) is a software engineering school for women offering accelerated software development programs, together with placement services and coaching. Hackbright’s programs are delivered in person through Hackbright’s classrooms in the San Francisco Bay Area.

5


Table of Contents

The New York Code and Design Academy, Inc. (“NYCDA”). is a New York City-based provider of web and application software development courses. NYCDA is not accredited and does not participate in state or federal student financial aid programs. NYCDA courses have been delivered primarily on-ground to students in partnership with business and education partners seeking to further their employees’ or students’ career in software application development.

Sophia Learning, LLC (“Sophia”) is an innovative learning company which leverages technology to support self-paced learning, including courses eligible for transfer into credit at over 2,000 colleges and universities.

History

Strategic Education was formed on August 1, 2018 with the merger of Strayer Education, Inc. and CEC. The Company’s primary operating subsidiaries are Strayer University and Capella University.

 

Founded in 1892, Strayer University is an institution of higher learning that offers undergraduate and graduate degree programs in business administration, accounting, information technology, education, health services administration, nursing, public administration, and criminal justice at 7172  physical campuses, predominantly located in the eastern United States, and online. Strayer University also offers an executive MBA online through its Jack Welch Management Institute (“JWMI”). For the 2017 fall term, we had 48,144 students enrolledJWMI, which was acquired in our programs.December 2011. Strayer University is accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (hereinafter referred to as “Middle(“Middle States” or “Middle States Commission”), one of the six regional collegiate accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Department of Education (“Department of Education” or the “Department”). Middle States is located at 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (267-284-5000).Education. By offering its programs both online and in physical classrooms, theStrayer University provides its working adult students more flexibility and convenience. Strayer University, with its online offerings, attracts students from around the country and throughout the world.

 

The New York CodeCapella University was founded in 1991 and Design Academy provides non-degree courses in web and application software development, primarily at its campuses in New York City and in Philadelphia, PA. NYCDA is licensed by the New York Bureau of Proprietary School Supervision, but is not accredited and does not participate in state or federal student financial aid programs. We acquired NYCDA on January 13, 2016.

On October 29, 2017, we entered into a merger agreement with Capella Education Company (“Capella”). Capella provides post-secondary education and job-skills programs primarily through its subsidiary Capella University. The merger was approved by our shareholders and by Capella’s stockholders on January 19, 2018. Upon consummation of the merger, Capella will become our wholly-owned subsidiary and will continue to offer its education programs through Capella University. Pursuant to the merger, we will issue 0.875 shares of Strayer Common Stock for each issued and outstanding share of Capella Common Stock, and outstanding equity awards held by current Capella employees and certain non-employee directors will be assumed by us and converted into comparable Strayer awards at the exchange ratio. Outstanding equity awards held by Capella non-employee directors who will not serve as directors of Strayer after completion of the merger and by former Capella employees will be settled in connection with completion of the merger in exchange for cash payments as specified in the merger agreement. Following the merger, Strayer and Capella stockholders are expected to own approximately 52% and 48%, respectively, of the outstanding combined company shares on a fully diluted basis, based on the number of shares currently expected to be outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger. Also, in connection with the completion of the merger and as approved by our shareholders on January 19, 2018, we will change our name to Strategic Education, Inc. and increase the number of shares of authorized Common Stock to 32,000,000. The merger is anticipated to close in the third quarter of 2018, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including the receipt of approval by the Higher Learning Commission.  Commission, one of the six regional collegiate accrediting agencies recognized by the Department of Education. Capella University offers a variety of doctoral, master’s and bachelor’s programs, primarily for working adults. Capella University focuses on master's and doctoral degrees, with 70% of its learners enrolled in a master’s or doctoral degree program. Its academic offerings are built with competency-based curricula and designed to demonstrate competencies through real-world, authentic assessments delivered in an online format that is both convenient and flexible.

 

WeThe Company generated net revenue of $455$634 million in 2017.2018. For more information regarding our revenues, profits, and financial condition, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Industry Background

 

The United States market for post-secondary education is large, fragmented, and competitive. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, more than 20.4the total number of post-secondary learners enrolled as of the fall of 2016 was 20.2 million, students attend approximately 7,000 post-secondary institutionsreflecting a 6.3% decrease from record enrollment in the United States. About 1.6fall of 2010. Approximately 1.4 million students attendof these learners attended proprietary institutions. Controversy about the cost of higher education, under-employment of many college graduates, and persistent negative media coverage hashave caused some prospective students to question the value proposition of higher education. According to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, college enrollments in all higher education sectors declined 1.4%1.0% and 1.0%1.7% in the fall 2016of 2017 and 2017,

5


Table of Contents

2018, respectively. Enrollment at proprietary colleges declined 14.5%7.1% and 7.1%15.1% in the fall 2016of 2017 and 2017,2018, respectively. The industry is heavily dependent on continued availability of funding for programs under Title IV of the Higher Education Act (“Title IV programs”), and concerns about potential reductions in such funding also could negatively impactaffect demand for higher education.

 

Notwithstanding weaker demand dynamics over the past few years, we believe that over time, demand for post-secondary education will increase as a result of demographic, economic, and social trends. The U.S. Census Bureau has reported that approximately 6262.5 million adults over the age of 25 in the United States do not have more than a high school education, and approximately 3635.5 million adults over the age of 25 have some college experience but have not completed a college degree. Other trends that could positively impactaffect demand for our programs include:

6


Table of Contents

 

·

increasing demand by employers for certain types of professional and skilled workers;

 

·

growth in the number of high school graduates from 2.8 million in 1999-2000 to an estimated 3.6 million in 2017-2018,2018-2019, according to the National Center for Education Statistics;

 

·

the significant and measurable income premium and enhanced employment prospects attributable to post-secondary education;

 

·

a number of initiatives underway to reduce the cost of a post-secondary education; and

 

·

continued demand from working adults for programs offered by regionally accredited institutions.

 

Competition

The post-secondary education market is highly competitive, with no private or public institution holding a significant market share. Strayer University and Capella University (the “Universities”) compete for students and learners primarily with traditional public and private degree-granting accredited colleges and universities, other proprietary degree-granting accredited schools, and alternatives to higher education. In addition, we face competition from various non-traditional, credit-bearing and noncredit-bearing education programs, provided by both proprietary and not-for-profit providers, including massive open online courses offered worldwide without charge by traditional educational institutions and other direct-to-consumer education services. As the proportion of traditional colleges providing alternative learning modalities increases, we will face increasing competition for students from traditional colleges, including colleges with well-established reputations for excellence. As online learning matures as a modality for education delivery across higher education, we believe that the intensity of the competition we face will continue to increase.

We believe the key factors affecting our competitive position include the quality of our programs offered, the quality of other services provided to learners, our reputation among students and in the general marketplace, the cost and perceived value of our offerings, the employment rate and terms of employment for our graduates, the ease of access to our offerings, the quality and reputation of our faculty and other employees, the quality of our campus facilities and online platforms, the time commitment required to complete our programs and obtain a degree, the quality and size of our alumni base, and our relationship with other learning institutions.

Company Strengths

 

We haveThe Company has a track record of providing practical and convenient education programs and solutions for working adults and employers. Through the merger with Capella Education Company on August 1, 2018 (“the Merger”), the Company retains the individual strengths of its two independently operated universities while creating a combined corporate and shared service platform that enables significant cost synergies and best practice sharing, both of which help us deliver significant benefits to students. We believe the following strengths position us to capitalize on the demand for post-secondary education:

 

·

Focus on Innovation. The Company values innovation and actively invests in the educational experience to improve student success and employment outcomes, while also addressing national challenges including the affordability of higher education and meeting the skill requirements of employers. Capella University’s competency-based learning infrastructure and direct assessment capabilities, and Strayer University’s video, simulation and content capabilities are examples of this drive to transform education delivery and learning by working adults. Through the Merger, both Universities can leverage these transformational capabilities.

·

Consistent operating history. Strayer University has been in continuous operation since 1892 and hasCapella University since 1991, and both have demonstrated an ability to operate consistently and grow profitably. The

7


Table of Contents

Merger positions the combined Company to continue this track record, with a broader, more diversified product offering, a balanced revenue mix, cost and revenue synergies, and greater scale.

 

·

Practical and diversified programs. We offer programs in practical areas of adult education. In order to keep pace with a changing knowledge-based economy, we constantly strive to meet the evolving needs of our students, learners and their current and prospective employers by regularly refining, updating, and adding to our portfolio of educational programs. In January 2016, we acquired NYCDA, which offers non-degree coursesThe Merger creates a diversified program portfolio that includes Strayer University’s programs in web and application software development that prepare students for high-demand jobs in software and web application development. In December 2011, Strayer University acquiredbusiness, including the Jack Welch Management Institute, an online leadership educationaccounting, economics and information technology, and Capella University’s competency-based programs in healthcare and counseling, as well as a robust doctoral portfolio. This program that enables us to offer a differentiated executive MBA degree and executive certificates todiversity will help the Company better meet the educational needs of students and employees of leading corporations. Across Strayer University and NYCDA, we currently offer approximately 100 different degree, diploma, certificate, and non-degree training programs and concentrations.in the modern economy.

 

·

Focus on adults pursuing career-relevant degree and non-degree programs. We focus on serving adults who are pursuing undergraduate and graduate degrees as well as non-degree certificates and training programs that will help them advance their careers and employment opportunities. We provide high quality student support services such as advising, writing, tutoring and research support; administrative services; library services; financial aid counseling; and career counseling. Increasingly, we are leveraging data and analytics to create personalized experiences for our students and learners, which is reflected in our early cohort persistence improvements and continued high student satisfaction.

 

·

Flexible program offerings. We maintainoffer flexible programs that allow students to attend classes and complete coursework during the day, in the evening, and on weekends throughout the calendar year. Online programs offeredyear at our on-ground campuses, and at the student or learner’s convenience through Strayer University enable students to take some or all of their classes via the internet. Approximately 85% of our students enrolled for the 2017 fall term were taking all of their courses online.comprehensive online program offerings.

 

·

Attractive and convenient campus locations. Strayer University’s campuses are located in growing metropolitan areas, mostly in the Mid-Atlantic and Southern regions where there are large populations of

6


Table of Contents

adults with demographic characteristics similar to those of our typical students. OurThe campuses are attractive and modern, offering conducive learning environments in convenient locationslocations. Post-merger, our expertise in ground based operations can be leveraged to extend Capella University offerings in new and innovative ways.

 

·

Established brand namenames and alumni support. With a 126-year operating history, Strayer University is anand Capella University are established brand namenames in post-secondary adult education, and oureducation. Our students and graduates are effective ambassadors of both brands through their work throughoutat companies across corporate America. OurAmerica and, along with our growing alumni network fostersnetworks, foster greater brand awareness and additional referral opportunities for students.new students and learners.

 

Company Strategy

 

Our goal is to be a leading innovator and provider of career-relevant and meaningful education programs primarily in the areas of business, accounting, information technology, and software development, that prepare students for advancement in their careers and professional lives. We have identified the following strategic priorities as key to achieving our goal:

 

·

Improve student success — Our success depends on the success of our students. The more we focus on helping our students succeed, the more likely it is that we will succeed. In order to improve student success, we must continue to hire outstanding faculty, produce high quality academic course content, that engages and inspires students, and employ cutting edge technology innovations that enable us to deploy faculty and content in increasingly efficient and reliableeffective ways.

 

·

Enhance student experience — Our students are predominately working adults who are furthering their education in order to advance their careers and professional lives. Our students are busy with work and family responsibilities that leave little time for other endeavors. Thus, we make every effort to make all interactions with our students productive, and we are constantly looking for ways to serve them better. This initiative includes leveraging technology, including artificial intelligence and automation, to improve student servicesupport in the areas of advising, tutoring, registration, campus and online technology, and administration. We measure

8


Table of Contents

our performance through student surveys and focus groups.groups as well as through metrics like persistence and continuation.

 

·

Address affordabilityThe cost of a post-secondary education has increased substantially over the last decade while average earnings have only recently begun to increase. Recognizing that affordability is an importanta significant factor in a prospective student’s decision to further his or her education, in late 2013, we commenced an effortthe Company has implemented various initiatives to make its programs more affordable. For example, through the Graduation Fund, introduced at Strayer University to make our degree programs more affordable. First, we introduced our Graduation Fund. Under this program,in late 2013, qualifying students enrolled in a bachelor’s degree program are eligible to receive one free course for every three courses successfully completed towards a bachelor’s degree. The free courses earned are redeemable in one’s final academic year. Furthermore, beginningAdditionally, Capella University’s FlexPath direct assessment model provides opportunity to drive affordability through the winter term 2014, wepotential for lower tuition costs, reduced undergraduatetime to completion, and increased flexibility. Strayer University and Capella University have also instituted various other tuition for new students by 20%. In 2017, we began testing reduced tuition across several graduate degree programs in several different states.reductions and scholarships. We continue to monitor and assess the impact of our affordability initiatives and explore other ways to make our offerings as affordable as possible. We have also begun to deploy more aggressively deployaggressive technology innovations, including artificial intelligence and automation, that enable us to lower our operating costs and thus improvingimprove our ability to support lower tuition. Our focus on affordability is further supported by the corporate-level efficiencies that we expect to be achieved through the Merger.

 

·

Establish new platforms for growth  We are constantly looking for new ways to leverage our existing resources and capabilities to grow. Our acquisitions of the Jack Welch Management Institute in 2011, and NYCDA in 2016, represent continued opportunitiesThe Merger represents a significant opportunity to leverage our management capabilitybest-in-class processes and our physical campus and online infrastructurepractices to accelerate growth. The Company also launched SEI Ventures in 2018, which is a seed-stage venture fund that will support pioneering education tech start-ups focused on transformational technologies and student success. In addition to providing capital, the venture fund will offer portfolio companies the opportunity to pilot technologies across the Universities and coding boot camps. We also continue to leverage the strong reputation and track record of Strayer University to develop new programs and concentrations like the Bachelor of Science in Nursing degree, which received Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education accreditation in mid-2017, and theStrayer University’s Bachelor of Applied Science in Management, which began instruction in the Winter 2018 term. We also launched in 2017term; the MBA in Digital Entreprenuership,Entrepreneurship, a collaboration with Cheddar, a leading business news outlet that streams live from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.Exchange; and additional program offerings under Capella University’s FlexPath direct assessment model.

 

·

Build a high performing culture — In order to be a leading provider of educational services, we must have talented and motivated faculty and employees who are passionate about serving students. We strive to attract the best talent and then develop and retain them. We want to be known as an employer of choice and be a place where one can build a long-term career.

7


Table of Contents

Strayer University

Strayer University is an institution of higher learning that offers undergraduate and graduate degree programs in business administration, accounting, information technology, education, health services administration, public administration, and criminal justice at 72 physical campuses, predominantly located in the eastern United States, and online. Strayer University is accredited by the Middle States Commission, one of the six regional collegiate accrediting agencies recognized by the Department. By offering its programs both online and in physical classrooms, Strayer University provides its working adult students more flexibility and convenience.

 

Curriculum

 

Strayer University offers business, information technology, and professional curricula to equip students with specialized and practical knowledge and skills for careers in business, industry, and government. Our academicAcademic leaders regularly review and revise theStrayer University’s course offerings to improve ourits educational programs and respond to competitive changes in job markets. WeStrayer University regularly evaluateevaluates new programs and degrees to ensure that we stayit stays current with the needs of our students and their employers.

9


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2018, Strayer University offers programs in the following areas:

 

Graduate Programs

    

Undergraduate Programs

Master of Business Administration (M.B.A.) Degree

 

Bachelor of Science (B.S.) Degree

Jack Welch Executive Master of Business

 

 

Accounting

 

Administration (M.B.A.) Degree

 

 

Criminal Justice

Master of Education (M.Ed.) Degree

 

 

Information Systems

Master of Public Administration (M.P.A.) Degree

 

 

Information Technology

Master of Science (M.S.) Degree

 

 

Nursing

 

Accounting

 

Bachelor of Business Administration (B.B.A.) Degree

 

Health Services Administration

 

 

Accounting

 

Human Resource Management

 

 

Acquisition and Contract Management

 

Information Assurance

 

 

Entrepreneurship

 

Information Systems

 

 

Finance

 

Management

 

 

Health Services Administration

 

Nursing

 

 

Hospitality and Tourism Management

 

 

 

 

Human Resource Management

 

 

 

 

Management

 

 

 

 

Marketing

 

 

 

 

Project Management

 

 

 

 

Retail Management

 

 

 

 

Social Media Marketing

 

 

 

 

Joe Gibbs Performance Management

 

 

 

Bachelor of Applied Science in Management

 

 

 

Associate in Arts (A.A.) Degree

 

 

 

 

Accounting

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions and Contract Management

 

 

 

 

Business Administration

 

 

 

 

Information Systems

 

 

 

 

Information Technology

 

 

 

 

Marketing

 

 

 

Diploma Program

 

 

 

 

Acquisition and Contract Management

 

Each undergraduate degree program includes courses in oral and written communication skills as well as mathematics and various disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. In addition to our degree and diploma programs, we offerStrayer University offers classes to non-degree and non-program students wishing to take courses for personal or professional enrichment.

 

Although most of ourits programs are offered at our campuses and online, theStrayer University adapts its course offerings to the demands of the student population at each location. Strayer University students may enroll in courses at more than one campus and take some or all of their courses online.

 

8


Table of Contents

Strayer University structures its curricula to allow students to advance sequentially from one learning level to another by applying credits earned in one program toward attainment of a more advanced degree. For example, a student originally pursuing an associate’s degree in information systems can extend his or her original educational objective by taking additional courses leading to a bachelor’s degree in information systems, and ultimately a master’s degree in information systems. This curriculum design provides students a level of competency and a measure of attainment in the event they interrupt their education or choose to work in their field of concentration prior to obtaining their final degree.

 

10


Table of Contents

Online

 

Strayer University has been offering courses online since 1997. Currently, almost all students taking classes online choosedo so in the asynchronous format. Students may take all of their courses online or may take online courses in combination with classroom-based courses. A student taking classes online has the same admission and financial aid requirements, is subject to substantially the same policies and procedures, and receives the same student services and support as campus-based Strayer University students. Tuition for online courses is the same as campus-based courses.

 

Faculty

 

TheStrayer University appoints faculty who hold appropriate academic credentials, are dedicated, active professionals in their field, and are enthusiastic and committed to teaching working adults. In accordance with ourStrayer University’s educational mission, theStrayer University faculty focuses itsmembers focus their efforts on teaching. The normal course load for a full-time faculty member is five courses per quarter for each of three quarters, or 15 courses per academic year. Further, many full-time faculty members participate actively in theat Strayer University by providing leadership, developing the curriculum, setting academic policy, and serving on assessment committees.

 

We provideNone of its employees are a party to any collective bargaining or similar agreement with Strayer University. Strayer University provides financial support for faculty members seeking to enhance their skills and knowledge. The University maintainsknowledge through a professional development funding program that reimburses eligible faculty and deans for continuing their education and completing courses, continuing education, seminars, and various programs that enhance their current credentials and knowledge base to improve their content expertise. Full-time faculty (and all other full-time employees) receive a 90%100% discount for all Strayer University courses. TheStrayer University also conducts annual in-house faculty workshops in each discipline. We believe that ourStrayer University’s dedicated and capable faculty is one of the keys to ourits success.

 

Organization of Strayer University

 

Overall academic and business decisions of theStrayer University, including review and approval of the annual financial budget, are directed by its Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees consists of Dr. Charlotte F. Beason, Chairwoman, and currently eight other members. The UniversityStrayer University’s By-Laws prescribe that a majority of members be independent from theStrayer University and Strayer Education, Inc.the Company to assure independent oversight of all academic programs and services. Of the nine members, fivesix are independent. The Boards of the two Universities are independent from the Universityof each other, and Strayer Education, Inc. The current Trustees are listed below:

9


Table of Contents

Board of Trustees

Dr. Charlotte F. Beason

Dr. Beason is the Chairwoman of the Board of Trustees. She has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 1996. She has extensive experience in education, distance learning, and the accreditation of education programs. (See Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)

Mr. Mark C. Brown

Mr. Brown is Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees. In 2015, he retired from his role as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Strayer Education, Inc., a position he held for 14 years, and joined the University’s Board of Trustees. Mr. Brown was previously the Chief Financial Officer of the Kantar Group, the information and consultancy division of WPP Group, a multi-national communications services company. Prior to that, for nearly 12 years, Mr. Brown held a variety of management positions at PepsiCo, Inc., including Director of Corporate Planning for Pepsi Bottling Group and Business Unit Chief Financial Officer for Pepsi-Cola International. Mr. Brown is a Certified Public Accountant who started his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP. Mr. Brown holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from Duke University and a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard University.

Dr. Jonathan Gueverra*

Dr. Gueverra was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2012. He now serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Florida Keys Community College. Prior to this appointment, he was the founding Chief Executive Officer of the Community College of the District of Columbia, the first community college in Washington, D.C. With over 25 years of higher education experience, Dr. Gueverra has served in a variety of administrative and faculty positions in two-year and four-year colleges and universities along the nation’s east coast. In 2015, he was elected to the board of trustees for the Southern Association of Schools and Colleges, Commission on Colleges. Prior to this, he served as a member of the board of the American Association for Community Colleges and co-chaired the Commission on Workforce Development. In addition, Dr. Gueverra serves on the Steering Committee and the Communications Committee for the Council of Presidents for the Florida College System. Dr. Gueverra holds an associate degree from Newbury College, a bachelor’s degree from Providence College, and a master’s degree in business administration and a doctorate in education both from the University of Massachusetts.

Mr. Brian W. Jones

Mr. Jones was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2015 as an ex officio member and has served as Strayer University President since 2015. Mr. Jones joined Strayer University in 2012 as the General Counsel. (See Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)

Mr. Todd A. Milano

Mr. Milano has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 1992 and has more than 30 years of experience in post-secondary education. He is President Emeritus and Ambassador for Central Penn College, where he has devoted his entire professional career, having served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1989 to 2012. (See Item 10 below for additional biographical information.)

10


Table of Contents

Dr. William C. Reha, MD*

Dr. Reha has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 2007 and is Chair of its Alumni and Student Affairs Committee. He is a Board Certified Urologic Surgeon in Woodbridge, Virginia. Dr. Reha is active in Strayer University alumni affairs and is the 2005 Outstanding Alumni Award winner. Dr. Reha has served as President of the Prince William County Medical Society, the Potomac Hospital Medical Staff, and the Virginia Urological Society. He was also Speaker and is the immediate former President of the Medical Society of Virginia. He serves on the Virginia Delegation to the American Medical Association and is a State Society Network Representative for the American Association of Clinical Urologists. Dr. Reha is a Fellow of the Claude Moore Physician Leadership Institute and holds a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry from Binghamton University, an M.D. from New York Medical College, and a master’s in business administration from Strayer University. He completed his residency in Surgery/Urology at Georgetown University.

Dr. Peter D. Salins*

Dr. Salins has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 2002 and is Chair of its Curriculum and Assessment Committee. Having served as Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs of the State University of New York (SUNY) system from 1997 to 2006, he is currently University Professor of Political Science at SUNY’s Stony Brook University and Director of its graduate program in public policy. Dr. Salins is a Fellow of the American Institute of Certified Planners and a Director of the Citizens Housing and Planning Council of New York. Dr. Salins holds a bachelor’s degree in architecture, a master’s degree in regional planning and a doctorate in metropolitan studies and regional planning, all from Syracuse University.

Dr. Carol Shapiro, MD*

Dr. Shapiro was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2015. Dr. Shapiro, a plastic surgeon, is the Medical Director of the Wound Healing Center of Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center. She has served as President of the medical staff of the two hospitals in the county in which she practices. She has also served as President of the Prince William County Medical Society and was the first woman to be elected President of the Medical Society of Virginia. She chaired the Virginia Delegation of the American Medical Society. Dr. Shapiro served as President of the National Capital Society of Plastic Surgeons, and was appointed to serve on the Ethics and Judicial Committees of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Additionally, she has served on the Board of Trustees of the Prince William Hospital and Potomac Hospital. Currently, she is the Vice Chair of the Potomac Health Foundation and Chair of the Grants Committee, and serves on the Board of Trustees of Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center. Dr. Shapiro did her undergraduate work at the University of Pittsburgh and earned her M.D. at the Woman’s Medical College in Philadelphia. After completing a residency in General Surgery and Plastic Surgery at Georgetown University, she started a solo practice in Woodbridge, Virginia. For several years, Dr. Shapiro was a Clinical Instructor at Georgetown University Department of Plastic Surgery. In 1996, she earned an MBA from George Mason University.

Dr. J. Chris Toe*

Dr. Toe has served as a member of the Board of Trustees since 2003. He served as President of Strayer University from 2003 to April 2006 and as Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Liberia from 2006 to 2009. Dr. Toe now serves as Executive Chairman of Agrifore Advisory & Investment Services (AAIS), Incorporated in Liberia and Senior Advisor for Country Strategic Planning for the World Food Programme in Rome, Italy. Dr. Toe holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Liberia, and a master’s degree in agricultural economics and a doctorate in economics, both from Texas Tech University.


*        Independent member.

11


Table of Contents

have no overlapping members.

 

Within the academic, strategic and financial parameters set by the Board of Trustees, theStrayer University is managed on a daily basis by the Strayer University President. The President is charged with the responsibility of overseeing the implementation of the policies established by the Board of Trustees and is supported in this function by senior administrative officers, including the Provost/Chief Academic Officer and the Chief Operating Officer of theStrayer University. The majority of theStrayer University’s operations are centralized within the President’s Office or theStrayer University’s senior administrative staff offices. These operations include academic programs, academic intelligence, academic services, student affairs, academic records, accounting and auditing, human resources, operations, marketing, public relations, facilities, information technology, and regulatory compliance, including oversight of the University’s participation in federal student financial aid programs.

Within this centralized structure, responsibilities fit within the purview of either the Provost/Chief Academic Officer or the Chief Operating Officer, both of whom report to the University President. The senior administrative officers that support the Provost/Chief Academic Officer in performing academic functions include six Academic Program Directors, a Vice President of Student and Faculty Resources, a Dean of Students in Student Affairs, a Vice President of Faculty, a Vice President of Institutional Research, and a Vice President for Content. Together, these individuals are responsible for faculty hiring and management, faculty development, curriculum development, student complaint resolution, policy oversight, student learning resources, and student learning outcomes. Each academic function receives further support from the University Registrar.

Operational functions including Student Financial Services, Information Technology, and campus operations are the primary responsibility of the Chief Operating Officer of the University. Other senior administrative officers also support the President in areas such as legal compliance, accounting and auditing, computer technology, insurance, and human resources. All of the senior administrative officers collaborate to ensure that University operations meet the annual budget established by the Board of Trustees and all applicable regulatory requirements.

University Senior Management

Brian W. Jones is University President. His biographical information is set forth in Item 10 below. At the regional and campus levels, the academic functions are overseen by the Regional Vice Provost and Campus Deans. Faculty are overseen by the Vice President of Faculty and Deans of Faculty. Day-to-day business operations are managed by a Campus Director. Campuses are staffed with personnel performing academic advising, financial aid, student services, admissions, and career development functions. Learning resource centers at campuses support the University’s instructional programs. Each learning resource center contains a library and computer laboratories and is operated by a full-time manager and/or a part-time assistant, depending on the campus student population, who assist students in the use of research resources.

Strayer Education, Inc. Executive Officers

For a description of Strayer Education, Inc.’s senior management, see the biographical information set forth in Item 10 below.

 

Outreach

 

To identify potential students, we engageStrayer University engages in a broad range of activities to inform working adults and their employers about the programs offered at Strayer University.offered. These activities include direct, digital, and social media marketing, marketing to our existing students and graduates, print and broadcast advertising, student referrals, and corporate and government outreach activities. Direct response methods (direct, digital, and social media marketing) are used to generate inquiries from potential students. All information relevant to prospective students is published on ourthe website, www.strayer.edu. Strayer University maintains booths and information tables at appropriate conferences and expos, as well as at transfer days at community colleges. We also depend on the recommendation ofRecommendations from our alumni network toalso maintain and enhance Strayer University’s reputation and promote its quality education. OurIts business-to-business outreach efforts include personal telephone calls, distribution of information through corporate intranets and human resource departments, and on-site information meetings. We recordStrayer University records inquiries in ourits database and tracktracks them through to application

1211


 

Table of Contents

application and registration. Additionally, we provide information about new programs is provided to students and alumni to encourage them to return for further education.

 

Student Profile

 

The majority of Strayer University students are working adults completing their first college degree to improve their job skills and advance their careers. Of the students enrolled in Strayer University’s programs at the beginning of the 20172018 fall quarter, approximately 64%63% were age 31 or older, and approximately 87%89% were engaged in part-time study (fewer than three courses each quarter for undergraduate students and fewer than two for graduate students).

 

In the 20172018 fall quarter, ourStrayer University’s undergraduate students registered for an average of approximately two courses, and our graduate students registered for an average of approximately one course.

 

Strayer University has a very diverse student population. At the beginning of the 20172018 fall quarter, approximately 76% of students self-reporting their ethnicity were minorities, and approximately 66%69% of students were women. Approximately 1% of theStrayer University’s students were international, and approximately 1% were active duty military personnel. Strayer University prides itself on making post-secondary education accessible to working adults who were previously unable to take advantage of educational opportunities.

 

The following is a breakdown of Strayer University students by program level as of the 20172018 fall term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number of

    

Percentage of 

 

    

Number of

    

Percentage of 

 

Program

 

students

 

total students

 

 

students

 

total students

 

Bachelor’s

 

34,692

 

72%

 

 

39,526

 

75%

 

Master’s

 

11,780

 

24%

 

 

11,300

 

22%

 

Associate

 

1,533

 

3%

 

 

1,419

 

3%

 

Total Degree

 

48,005

 

99%

 

 

52,245

 

100%

 

Diploma

 

 6

 

*

 

 

20

 

*

 

Graduate Certificate

 

53

 

*

 

Undeclared

 

133

 

*

 

 

129

 

*

 

Total Non-Degree

 

139

 

1%

 

 

202

 

*

 

Total Students

 

48,144

 

100%

 

 

52,447

 

100%

 


*Represents less than 1%.

 

OurStrayer University’s business is seasonal and as a result, ourits quarterly results of operations tend to vary within the year due to student enrollment patterns. Enrollment generally is lowest in the third quarter, or summer term.

 

Student Admissions

 

Students attending Strayer University’s undergraduate programs must possess a high school diploma or a General Educational Development (GED) Certificate. Students attending Strayer University’s graduate programs must have a bachelor’s degree from an accredited institution and meet certain other requirements. If a student’s undergraduate major varies widely from the student’s proposed graduate course of study, certain undergraduate prerequisite courses may also be necessary for admission. To maximize undergraduate students’ chances for academic success and to ensure they receivegive them the support they need, Strayer University evaluates incoming students’ proficiency in fundamental English and math prior to the first quarter’s registration.

 

12


Table of Contents

International students applying for admission must meet the same admission requirements as other students. Those students whose native language is not English must provide evidence that they are able to use the English language with sufficient facility to perform college-level work in an English-speaking institution.

 

13


Table of Contents

Tuition and Fees

 

Strayer University charges tuition by the course. Tuition rates may vary in states with specific regulations governing tuition costs. Each course is 4.5 credit hours. As of January 1, 2018,2019, undergraduate tuition is $1,450$1,465 per course. Undergraduate students who were previously enrolled at theStrayer University are charged rates ranging from $1,420$1,465 to $1,775 per course. As of January 1, 2017,2019, graduate students who were new to theStrayer University after January 1, 2015 are charged at a rate of $2,450$2,465 per course, while other graduate students are charged at a rate of $2,325$2,340 per course. For the Jack Welch Management Institute, students who are new to the Universitystudents are charged at the rate of $3,650 per course. For some students who were previously enrolled in the Jack Welch Management Institute, tuition is charged at rates ranging from $2,580 to $3,450 per course. Under a variety of different programs and in connection with various corporate and government sponsorship and tuition reimbursement arrangements, Strayer University offers scholarships and tuition discounts to students. One of these programs, the Graduation Fund, offers a student in a bachelor’s program an opportunity to earn up to a 25% reduction of the tuition required for a degree. A new undergraduate student, withwho had no transfer credit, seekingsought to obtain a bachelor’s degree in four years, and who was eligible for ourthe Graduation Fund would currently pay on average approximately $11,000 per year in tuition.

 

Career Development Services

 

Although most of Strayer University’s students are already employed, theStrayer University actively assists its students and alumni with career-related matters. The focus for Career Services at Strayer University is to provide career guidance and resources to assist students and alumni in reaching their educational and professional goals. Services are delivered through various media including online, in person, recorded video, books, periodicals, and by telephone. The services provided include career webinars, recorded seminars, career teleconferences, career advising, and resume review.

 

We regularly conduct alumni surveysCapella University

Capella University offers a variety of doctoral, master’s and bachelor’s programs, primarily for working adults. Capella University focuses on master's and doctoral degrees, with 70% of its learners enrolled in a master’s or doctoral degree program. Capella University's academic offerings are built with competency-based curricula and are delivered in an online format that is convenient and flexible. Capella University designs its offerings to help working adult learners develop specific competencies they can apply in their workplace. At December 31, 2018, Capella University offered over 2,000 online courses and 53 academic programs with 136 specializations. Capella University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, one of the six regional collegiate accrediting agencies recognized by the Department of Education.

13


Table of Contents

Curriculum

Capella University’s program offerings cover six markets: public service leadership; nursing and health sciences; psychology; business and technology; counseling and human services; and education. At December 31, 2018, Capella University offered 53 academic programs with 136 specializations within these markets:  

Public Service Leadership

Doctor of Philosophy in Criminal Justice

Master of Science in Emergency Management

Doctor of Philosophy in Emergency Management

Master of Public Administration (MPA)

Doctor of Emergency Management (DEM)

Master of Social Work (MSW)

Doctor of Public Administration (DPA)

Master of Social Work - Advanced Standing

Doctor of Social Work (DSW)

Bachelor of Science (BS) in Criminal Justice

Master of Science in Criminal Justice

Nursing and Health Sciences

Doctor of Health Administration (DHA)

Master of Science in Nursing (MSN)

General Health Administration

Care Coordination (FlexPath option available)

Health Care Leadership

Nursing Education (FlexPath option available)

Health Care Quality & Analytics

Nursing Information (FlexPath option available)

Health Policy and Advocacy

Nursing Leadership and Administration (FlexPath option available)

Doctor of Public Health (DrPH)

RN-to-MSN Care Coordination (FlexPath option available)

Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)

RN-to-MSN Nursing Education (FlexPath option available)

Master of Health Administration (MHA)

RN-to-MSN Nursing Informatics (FlexPath option available)

General Health Administration (FlexPath option available)

RN-to-MSN Nursing Leadership and Administration (FlexPath option available)

Health Care Informatics (FlexPath option available)

Bachelor of Science in Health Care Administration

Health Care Leadership (FlexPath option available)

Health Information Management (FlexPath option available)

Health Care Operations

Leadership (FlexPath option available)

Master of Public Health (MPH)

Bachelor of Science (BS) in Public Health

Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) (FlexPath option available)

Psychology

Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology

Master of Science in Psychology

Addiction Psychology

Applied Behavior Analysis

Behavior Analysis

Child and Adolescent Development (FlexPath option available)

Developmental Psychology

Education Psychology (FlexPath option available)

Educational Psychology

Evaluation, Rearch, and Management

General Psychology

General Psychology (FlexPath option available)

Industrial/Organizational Psychology

Industrial/Organizational Psychology (FlexPath option available)

Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)

Leadership Coaching Psychology

Clinical Psychology

Sport Psychology (FlexPath option available)

Doctor of Psychology (PsyD) in School Psychology

Bachelor of Science in Psychology

Master of Science in Clinical Psychology

General Psychology (FlexPath option available)

Applied Research

Bachelor of Science in Psychology Pre-Counseling

Clinical Counseling

Forensic

14


Table of Contents

Business and Technology

Doctor of Business Administration (DBA)

Doctor of Philosophy in Information Technology

Accounting

General Information Technology

Business Intelligence

Information Assurance and cybersecurity

Global Operations and Supply Chain Management

Information Technology Education

Human Resource Management

Project Management

Information Technology Management

Master of Science in Human Resources Management

Leadership

General Human Resource Management

Project Management

Master of Science in Analytics

Strategy and Innovation

Master of Science in Information Assurance and Cybersecurity

Doctor of Philosophy in Business Management

Digital Forensics

Accounting

Health Care Security

General Business Management

Network Defense

Human Resource Management

Master of Science in Information Technology

Information Technology Management

Analytics

Leadership

Cybersecurity

Project Management

Enterprise Networks and Cloud Computing

Strategy and Innovation

General Information Technology

Master of Business Administration (MBA)

Project Management

Self-Designed (FlexPath option available)

Bachelor of Science in Business

Health Care Management (FlexPath option available)

Accounting (FlexPath option available)

Human Resource Management (FlexPath option available)

Business Administration (FlexPath option available)

Project Management (FlexPath option available)

Finance

Doctor of Information Technology (DIT)

Health Care Management (FlexPath option available)

General Information Technology

Human Resource Management (FlexPath option available)

Information Assurance and Cybersecurity

Management and Leadership (FlexPath option available)

Information Technology Education

Marketing

Project Management

Project Management (FlexPath option available)

Bachelor of Science (BS) in Information Technology

General Information Technology (FlexPath option available)

Health Information Management

Information Assurance and Cybersecurity (FlexPath option available)

Project Management (FlexPath option available)

Software Development

Counseling and Human Services

Doctor of Human Services (DHS)

Master of Science in Human Services

Advanced Program Evaluation and Data Analytics

Leadership and Organizational Management

Leadership and Organizational Management

Program Evaluation and Data Analytics

Doctor of Philosophy in Human Services

Social and Community Services

Multidisciplinary Human Services

Master of Science in Marriage and Family Counseling

Nonprofit Management and Leadership

General Marriage and Family Counseling

Social and Community Services

Master of Science in Clinical Mental Health Counseling

Doctor of Philosophy in Advanced Studies in Human Behavior

Master of Science in School Counseling

General Advanced Studies in Human Behavior

Doctor of Philosophy in Counselor Education and Supervision

General Counselor Education and Supervision

Master of Science in Addiction Studies

15


Table of Contents

Education

Doctor of Education (EdD)

Doctor of Philosophy in Education (PhD)

Adult Education

Curriculum and Instruction

Curriculum and Instruction

Instructional Design for Online Learning

Educational Leadership and Management

K-12 Studies in Education

Performance Improvement Leadership

Leadership in Educational Administration

Personalized and Competency-Based Instruction

Leadership for Higher Education

Reading and Literacy

Nursing Education

Teacher Leader in K-12 Studies

Post-secondary and Adult Education

Teacher Leader in Digital Transformation

Professional Studies in Education

Education Specialist (EdS)

Special Education Leadership

Curriculum and Instruction

Master of Science in Education Innovation and Technology

Leadership in Educational Administration

Competency-Based Instruction

Personalized and Competency-Based Instruction

General Educational Technology

Reading and Literacy

Instruction in the 1:1 Environment

Teacher Leader in Digital Transformation

Personalized Learning

Teacher Leader in K-12 Studies

Professional Growth and Development

Master of Science in Higher Education

Master of Education (MEd) in Teaching and Learning (FlexPath option available)

Adult Education

Higher Education Leadership and Administration

Integrative Studies

Master of Science in Education

Curriculum and Instruction

Early Childhood Education

English Language Learning and Teaching

Instructional Design for Online Learning

K-12 Studies in Education

Leadership in Educational Administration

Reading and Literacy

Special Education Teaching

Training and Performance Improvement

Capella University's GuidedPath credit hour courses are offered on a quarterly academic schedule, which generally coincides with calendar quarters. Capella University offers new learners in most programs the flexibility to begin the first course in their program of study at the beginning of any month. These learners then enroll in subsequent courses on a regular quarterly course schedule. Depending on the program, learners generally enroll in one to two courses per quarter. Each course has a designated start date, and the majority of courses last for ten weeks.

To meet traditional Capella University best practices, GuidedPath learners typically need to access the online courseroom multiple times each week. However, the courses are developed to be taken asynchronously, so that learners can attend each course as it fits their weekly schedule. GuidedPath learners are required to respond to questions posed by the instructor, as well as comments made by other learners. This format provides for an interactive experience in which each learner is both encouraged and required to be actively engaged. Faculty are also required to have substantive engagement in each course each week. Additional learning activities may include reading, simulations, team projects and/or research papers. Capella University’s online format provides a digital record of learner interactions for the course instructor to assess learners’ levels of engagement and demonstration of required competencies. The course design also includes assessment of course competencies.

In the FlexPath model, learners’ demonstration of competencies is directly assessed by faculty when the learner submits an assessment. FlexPath learners set their own deadlines, demonstrate competencies via authentic assessment, and move

16


Table of Contents

through courses at their own speed, giving them an opportunity to accelerate or slow down to meet their learning needs and schedule demands.

The primary exception to Capella University’s online format is for doctoral learners and for certain master’s degree candidates pursuing professional licenses. These learners participate in periodic residencies, year-in-residencies, and supervised practica and internships as a complement to their courses. Residencies typically last from three to 42 days and are required, on average, once per year for learners in applicable programs. The supervised practica and internships vary in length based on the program in which the learner is enrolled.

Capella University also offers certificate programs, which consist of a series of courses focused on a particular area of study, for learners who seek to enhance their skills and knowledge. Online certificate courses can be taken to prepare for a graduate degree program or on a stand-alone basis. The duration of certificate programs ranges from two quarters to approximately two years.

Faculty

Capella University hires faculty who have teaching and/or practitioner experience in their particular discipline and possess significant and appropriate academic credentials. The faculty consists of full-time academic administrators, faculty chairs, core faculty and part-time faculty. The full-time academic administrators’ primary responsibilities are to monitor the career progressionquality and relevance of our graduatescurricula, to recruit and manage teaching faculty, and to support outcome assessment efforts required by Middle Statesmaintain standards of accreditation. Faculty chairs supervise the faculty in their respective specializations. Core faculty and state regulators.part-time faculty teach courses, serve on curriculum or other relevant committees, work on curriculum development in their areas of expertise, and serve as comprehensive exam and dissertation mentors to doctoral learners.

 

New York CodeNone of Capella University’s employees are a party to any collective bargaining or similar agreement with Capella University. Prior to offering a teaching assignment, Capella University provides significant training to new faculty members, including an online development program focused on the Capella University way of effective online teaching, its educational philosophy, teaching expectations and Design Academyits online platform. In addition, professional development and training is provided for all faculty members on an ongoing basis. To evaluate the performance of faculty members, courseroom activity is regularly monitored and assessments are made with respect to both learner satisfaction with the courseroom experience and learner performance against course outcomes.

 

We acquired NYCDAOrganization of Capella University

Overall academic and business decisions of Capella University, including review of the annual financial budget, are directed by its Board of Directors. The Board of Directors consists of Dr. Eric Jolly, Chairman, and currently nine other members. Capella University’s By-Laws prescribe that a majority of members be independent from Capella University and the Company to assure independent oversight of all academic programs and services. Of the ten members, seven are independent.

Within the academic, strategic and financial parameters set by the Board of Directors, Capella University is managed on a daily basis by the Capella University President. The President is charged with the responsibility of overseeing the implementation of the policies established by the Board of Directors and is supported in January 2016. this function by senior administrative officers, including the Chief Academic Officer and Vice President of Academic Affairs of Capella University. The majority of Capella University’s operations are centralized within the President’s Office or Capella University’s senior administrative staff offices.

Outreach

Capella University engages in a range of relationship-based marketing activities to build the Capella brand, differentiate it from other educational providers, increase awareness and consideration with prospective learners, generate inquiries for enrollment, and stimulate referrals from current learners and graduates. These marketing activities may include Internet, television, print, radio, email, social media and direct mail advertising campaigns. Other marketing

17


Table of Contents

activities include supportive outreach to current learners, participation in seminars and trade shows, and development of key marketing relationships with corporate, healthcare, armed forces, government, and educational organizations. Online advertising (display, social, mobile, search and through aggregators) currently generates the largest volume of inquiries from prospective learners.

Student Profile

As of December 31, 2018, Capella University enrollment was 38,409 learners. Of the Capella University learners who responded to the demographic survey, approximately 79% were female, and approximately 50% were people of color. Capella University’s learner population is geographically distributed primarily throughout the United States.

The following summarizes Capella University learners as of December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number of

    

Percentage of 

Program

 

learners

 

total learners

Doctoral

 

8,924

 

23%

Master's

 

17,978

 

47%

Bachelor's

 

10,364

 

27%

Other

 

1,143

 

3%

Total

 

38,409

 

100%

Student Admissions

Capella University’s admission process is designed to offer access to prospective learners who seek the benefits of a post-secondary education while providing feedback to learners regarding their ability to successfully complete their chosen program. Prior to the first course in their program of study, learners are generally required to complete an orientation to online education and a skills assessment, the results of which help develop an understanding of the specific needs and readiness of each individual learner. Learners must successfully complete the first course in their program of study to continue their education.

Learners enrolling in bachelor’s programs must have a high school diploma or a GED and demonstrate competence in writing and logical reasoning during the first course of their program of study. Additionally, applicants to undergraduate programs who do not have transferable credits from an accredited higher education institution are required to pass assessments in writing and reading prior to acceptance into the program. Learners enrolling in graduate programs must have the requisite undergraduate academic degree from an accredited institution and a specified minimum grade point average. In addition to standard admission requirements, Capella University requires applicants to some programs to provide additional application material and information, and/or interview with, and be approved by faculty.

Tuition and Fees

Capella University's overall tuition rates vary by discipline, length of program, and degree level.

Learners in the GuidedPath credit hour programs are charged tuition on a per course or per term basis. Per course prices vary by discipline, number of credit hours, and degree level. Per course prices for bachelor's level GuidedPath credit hour programs ranged from approximately $1,000 to $2,400 for both the 2018-2019 academic year (the academic year that began in July 2018) and the 2017-2018 academic year (the academic year that began in July 2017). Per course prices for master's level GuidedPath credit hour programs ranged from approximately $1,700 to $3,300 for the 2018-2019 academic year, and from $1,500 to $2,800 for the 2017-2018 academic year. Per course prices for doctoral level GuidedPath credit hour programs ranged from approximately $2,400 to $4,700 for the 2018-2019 academic year and from $2,500 to $4,100 for the 2017-2018 academic year.

18


Table of Contents

Learners in select doctoral programs are charged tuition at a fixed quarterly amount, regardless of the number of courses for which the learner registers. Quarterly tuition rates ranged from approximately $4,300 to $4,900 per quarter for the 2018-2019 academic year and from $4,300 to $4,800 per quarter for the 2017-2018 academic year.

Tuition for FlexPath master's and bachelor's programs is priced at a flat, fixed amount for each 12-week subscription period. There is no maximum course load during each subscription period; however, a maximum of two FlexPath courses can be taken at any one time. Tuition for bachelor's level FlexPath programs ranged from $2,400 to $3,000 per 12-week subscription period in the 2018-2019 academic year, and from $2,300 to $2,700 per 12-week subscription period in the 2017-2018 academic year. Tuition for master's level FlexPath programs ranged from $2,300 to $2,700 per 12-week subscription period for the 2018-2019 academic year and from $2,100 to $2,500 per 12-week subscription period for the 2017-2018 academic year.

“Other” in the preceding enrollment table primarily includes learners enrolled in certificate programs. Learners in credit hour certificate programs are charged tuition on a per course basis, which varies by discipline and the number of credit hours. Per course prices for certificate programs ranged from approximately $1,000 to $4,400 for the 2018-2019 academic year and from $1,000 to $4,200 for the 2017-2018 academic year. Tuition for FlexPath certificate programs ranged from $2,100 to $2,700 per 12-week subscription period for the 2018-2019 academic year and from $2,100 to $2,500 per 12-week subscription period for the 2017-2018 academic year.

Year-over-year tuition increases are specific to the program or specialization and depend on market conditions, program differentiation or changes in operating costs that have an impact on price adjustments of individual programs or specializations. Capella University implemented a weighted average tuition increase of approximately 2% for the 2018-2019 academic year. These program costs will vary by learner based upon the program and specialization selected, the number of courses taken per quarter and the number of transfer credits earned.

Capella University offers scholarships and tuition discounts, under a variety of different programs, to members of the armed forces and in connection with various corporate, healthcare, federal and educational marketing relationships, for example:

U.S. armed forces relationships and discount program available to all members of the U.S. armed forces, including active duty members, veterans, National Guard members, reservists, civilian employees of the Department of Defense and immediate family members of active duty personnel.

Corporate, healthcare and federal relationships with more than 500 large and mid-size organizations.

Educational relationships that encourage graduates of nearly 300 community colleges to enroll in Capella University undergraduate programs and faculty and administrators to enroll in Capella University graduate programs.

As of December 31, 2018, approximately 28% of Capella University learners received a discount in connection with these programs.

Throughout the past several years, Capella University expanded and refined its offering of learner success scholarships under a variety of different programs to promote affordability and encourage learners to remain enrolled. Learners must meet admission requirements and enroll and apply within certain timeframes to receive the scholarships, which are generally awarded over a period of four to eight consecutive quarters. As of December 31, 2018, approximately 18% of Capella University learners were awarded a scholarship.

Career Development Services

Career counseling, job search advising, and career management support is provided by staff to all Capella University learners and alumni. Capella University career counselors interact with learners and alumni via email, telephone, and online seminars to assist with career-related activities such as resume development; curriculum vitae and cover letter development; interview preparation; effective job search strategies; and career advancement efforts. The Career Center’s online iGuide resources help learners gather occupational information and trends, access job postings,

19


Table of Contents

and view sample job search documents. Counselors also assist with prospective learners’ selection of the Capella University program and specialization that best suits their professional aspirations.

Non-Degree Programs

The Company’s Non-Degree Programs are provided by DevMountain, Hackbright, Sophia and NYCDA. These programs provide workers and their employers with access to courses and trainings focused on software development, general education and other high demand job-ready skills over a shorter time period as compared to the degree programs. 

DevMountain is a software development school with locations in Provo and Salt Lake City, Utah; Dallas, Texas; and Phoenix, Arizona. DevMountain’s primary offerings are on-site, 12-week immersive programs in Web Development, iOS Development, and UX Design. The programs include instructor-led sessions, guest lectures, presentations and learning activities in the mornings, followed by afternoon labs and group projects. Throughout the program and beyond course hours, learners have access to DevMountain’s dedicated student success and employer relations teams as well as instructors and mentors. DevMountain does not participate in Title IV programs.

Hackbright is a San Francisco-based software engineering school for women with a mission to close the gender gap in the high-demand software engineering space. Hackbright’s core offering is an on-site, 12-week immersive software development program known as the “Fellowship Program.” Learners spend the first half of the program primarily in lecture-based learning combined with labwork, in which learners collaborate in pairs to build their programming knowledge. In the second half of the program, lectures continue, while the labwork gives way to more advanced project-based work, and the program concludes with an intense focus on career planning. Throughout the program, Hackbright supplements the learning experience with field trips to technology companies, exposing learners to various technologies and career possibilities, as well as a series of networking events. Hackbright provides a high level of support and guidance, including assigned mentors who provide the learner with support and technical advice, and an advisor who guides the learner through the program. Hackbright also engages employers through placement agreements, in which Hackbright earns a placement fee in exchange for providing access to, and facilitating the transition of alumnae into employment at companies seeking in-demand, qualified female software engineers. Hackbright does not participate in Title IV programs.

Sophia is an innovative learning company offering a variety of low-cost, self-paced, competency-based online learning courses, which are eligible for transfer into credit at over 2,000 colleges and universities. Sophia does not participate in Title IV programs.

NYCDA is a New York City-based provider of non-degree web and application software development courses. Courses are delivered on-ground to students seeking to further their career in software application development, with classes in several major markets across the United States, as well as in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. NYCDA does not participate in Title IV programs. Since its acquisition, NYCDA’s financial results have been insignificant relative to our consolidated financial results.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2017, we2018, Strategic Education, Inc. had a total of 1,3893,017 full-time employees, including 281397 full-time faculty members and 1,1082,620 non-faculty staff. Full-time faculty members teach on average 4-5 courses per quarter. The balance of classes are taught by adjunct faculty who normally teach 1-2 courses per academic quarter. Although we had approximately 1,3003,030 adjunct faculty throughout the year, not all of them teach every quarter. In the 20172018 fall quarter, approximately 35%25% of our courses were taught by full-time faculty. Because we are not a research university,universities, all faculty members are expected to spend their time teaching and advising students. In addition to our faculty, our non-faculty staff, including 155141 part-time employees, serve in the areas of information systems, financial aid, recruitment and admissions, student administration, marketing, human resources, corporate accounting, and other administrative functions.

 

Strategic Education, Inc. Executive Officers

For a description of Strategic Education, Inc.’s senior management, see the biographical information set forth in Item 10 below.

20


Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

 

In the ordinary course of business, we develop many kinds of intellectual property that are or will be the subject of copyright, trademark, service mark, patent, trade secret, or other protections. Such intellectual property includes, but is not limited to, our courseware materials for classes taught online or other distance-learning means and business know-how and internal processes and procedures developed to respond to the requirements of our operations and various education regulatory agencies. In many instances, our course content is produced for us by faculty and other content experts under work for hire agreements pursuant to which we own the course content in return for a fixed development fee. In certain limited cases, we license course content from third parties on a royalty fee basis.

We also claim rights to certain marks and have obtained federalor have pending applications in the U.S. and select foreign jurisdictions for registration of the marks, including the markmarks “STRAYER” and “CAPELLA” for educational services.

14


Table of Contents

Competition

The higher education industry is highly competitive, but fragmented,services, and certain other distinctive logos, along with no single participant possessing a significant market share. We compete for students with traditional publicvarious other trademarks, service marks and private two-year and four-year degree-granting accredited colleges and universities, other proprietary degree-granting accredited schools, and alternatives to higher education. In addition, we face competition from various non-traditional, credit-bearing and noncredit-bearing education programs, provided by both proprietary and not-for-profit providers, including massive open online courses offered worldwide without charge by traditional educational institutions and other direct-to-consumer education services. As the proportion of traditional colleges providing alternative learning modalities increases, we will face increasing competition for students from traditional colleges, including colleges with well-established reputations for excellence. As online learning matures as a modality for education delivery across higher education, we believe that the intensity of the competition we face will continue to increase.

We believe the key factors affecting our competitive position include the quality of the programs offered, the quality of other services provided to students, our reputation among students and in the general marketplace, the cost and perceived value of our offerings, the employment rate and terms of employment for our graduates, the ease of accessdomain names related to our offerings, the quality and reputation of our faculty and other employees, the quality of our campus facilities and online platform, the time commitment required to complete our program and obtain a degree, the quality and size of our alumni base, and our relationship with other learning institutions.offerings.

 

Regulation

 

Regulatory Environment

 

As an institutionregionally accredited institutions of higher education accredited by Middle States and operating in multiple jurisdictions, Strayer University isand Capella University are subject to accreditation rules and varying state licensing and regulatory requirements. In addition, the federal Higher Education Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder require all higher education institutions that participate in the various Title IV programs, including Strayer University and Capella University, to comply with detailed substantive and reporting requirements and to undergo periodic regulatory scrutiny. The Higher Education Act mandates specific regulatory responsibility for each of the following components of the higher education regulatory triad: (1) the institutional accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education (“Secretary of Education”); (2) state education regulatory bodies; and (3) the federal government through the Department of Education. Our business activities are planned and implemented to achieve compliance with the rules and regulations of the state, regional and federal agencies that regulate our activities. We have established regulatory compliance and management systems and processes under the oversight of our Chief Financial Officer and our General Counsel that are designed to meet the requirements of this regulatory environment. The regulations, standards, and policies of these regulatory agencies are subject to frequent change.NYCDA, isHackbright Academy, and DevMountain are subject to certain state regulatory requirements, but isare not accredited and doesdo not participate in Title IV programs.

 

The November 2016 and November 2018 federal elections brought a new President and Congress, respectively, and we cannot predict the actions that the new Administration or new Congress may take or their effect on Strayer University, NYCDA,Capella University, or the Company. Among other things, the new Congress may reauthorize the Higher Education Act and adopt, repeal or amend other legislation affecting higher education institutions. The new Congress or Administration may also delay, block, modify, or eliminate certain Title IV and other regulations applicable to higher education institutions, or the new Administration may promulgate new regulations upon culmination of current negotiated rulemaking processes, or otherwise. In addition, the new Administration may interpret, apply, and enforce Title IV and other regulations in a manner different from currentpast guidance and practice.

 

Department of Education

 

To be eligible to participate in Title IV programs, Strayer University and Capella University must comply with specific standards and procedures set forth in the Higher Education Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the Department of Education. An institution must, among other things, be authorized to offer its educational programs by each state in which it is physically located and maintain institutional accreditation by a recognized accrediting agency, as discussed below. The institution also must be certified by the Department of Education to participate in Title IV programs and follow Department of Education rules regarding the awarding and processing of funds issued under Title IV programs. For purposes of Title IV programs, Strayer University and all of its campuses are considered to be a single institutioninstitutions of

15


Table of Contents

higher education, such that Department of Education requirements applicable to an institution of higher

21


Table of Contents

education are generally applied to all of Strayer University’s campuses in the aggregate rather than on an individual basis. Capella University is also considered to be a single institution of higher education. On October 11, 2017, the Department and Strayer University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Strayer University’s continued participation in Title IV programs with full certification through June 30, 2021. As a result of the August 1, 2018 merger, Capella University experienced a change of ownership, with the Company as its new owner. On January 18, 2019, consistent with standard procedure upon a Title IV institution’s change of ownership, the Department and Capella University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Capella’s continued participation in Title IV programs with provisional certification through December 31, 2022.

 

Accreditation

 

Accreditation is a system for recognizing educational institutions and programs for integrity, educational quality, faculty, physical resources, administrative capability, and financial stability that signifies that they merit the confidence of the educational community and the public. In the United States, this recognition comes primarily through private voluntary associations of institutions and programs of higher education. These associations establish criteria for accreditation, conduct peer-review evaluations of institutions and programs, and publicly designate those institutions and programs that meet their standards. Accredited institutions or programs are subject to periodic review by accrediting bodies to determine whether such institutions or programs continue to maintain the performance, integrity, and quality required for accreditation. If an institution’s or program’s performance does not meet its accrediting agency’s (or other regulator’s) expectations or applicable standards, then its operations may be conditioned, severely constrained, or even curtailed, depending on the severity of the noncompliance.

 

Strayer University has been institutionally accredited since 1981 by Middle States, a regional accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary of Education. Strayer University went through a period of reaffirmation of accreditation that began in 2015 and lasted through June 2017, when Middle States reaffirmed Strayer University’s accreditation. The University’s period of accreditation by Middle States extends into 2025. Middle States accredits degree-granting public and private colleges and universities in its region (including Delaware, Washington, D.C., Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), including distance education programs offered by those institutions. Accreditation by Middle States is an important attribute of Strayer University and Capella University. Colleges and universities depend on accreditation to evaluate transferability of credit and applications to graduate schools. Employers rely on the accreditation status of institutions when evaluating a candidate’s credentials or considering tuition reimbursement programs. Students rely on accreditation status for assurance that an institution maintains quality educational standards.

 

In order for institutions to be eligible to participate in federal student financial assistance programs, they must be accredited by an institutional accreditor recognized by the Secretary of Education. The Higher Education Act charges the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (“NACIQI”) with recommending to the Secretary of Education which accrediting or state approval agencies should be recognized as reliable authorities for judging the quality of post-secondary institutions and programs. In June 2017, NACIQI renewed its recognition of Middle States for six months and required Middle States to demonstrate compliance with certain requirements. NACIQI reviewed Middle States at its February 2018 meeting and extendedrecommended that the Secretary of Education extend its recognition for five years. NACIQI also reviewed the Higher Learning Commission at its February 2018 meeting and recommended that the Secretary of Education extend its recognition for five years. If an institutional accreditor loses recognition by the Secretary of Education, an institution may be allowed to continue its participation in Title IV programs on a provisional basis for a period not to exceed 18 months to allow the institution to seek accreditation from another recognized accrediting agency. An institution that does not become accredited by another recognized accreditor within 18 months will lose Title IV eligibility.

 

Strayer University

Strayer University has been institutionally accredited since 1981 by Middle States, a regional accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary of Education. Middle States is the same accrediting agency that accredits such universities as Georgetown University, Columbia University, the University of Maryland, and other degree-granting public and private colleges and universities in its region.

Strayer University went through a period of reaffirmation of accreditation that began in 2015 and lasted through June 2017, when Middle States reaffirmed Strayer University’s accreditation. The University’s period of accreditation by Middle States extends into 2025. Middle States accredits degree-granting public and private colleges and universities in its region (including Delaware, Washington, D.C., Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), including distance education programs offered by those institutions.

22


Table of Contents

Beginning in 2013, Middle States undertook a review of its accreditation standards and, in June 2014, approved revised accreditation standards, with subsequent editorial clarifications. The new standards are effective for all institutions that have self-studies due beginning with the 2017-2018 academic year.

 

In 2016, Middle States provided that reaccreditation for all of its institutions will be for a period of eight years (rather than ten, as previously was the case) and that institutions will be required to submit annual reports on student achievement and financial sustainability. In accordance with Middle States’ accreditation standards, every accredited institution will undergo a periodic review at the mid-point between its eight-year evaluations.

 

All of Strayer University’s substantive changes require prior Middle States approval. Such changes include, but are not limited to, certain new educational programs, certain contractual arrangements with other institutions providing a portion of an educational program, establishment or closure of additional locations and branch campuses, and changes in ownership or control.

16


Table of Contents

 

In 2000, the agencies that accredit higher education institutions in various regions of the United States adopted a Policy Statement on Evaluation of Institutions Operating Interregionally. Under that policy, both the home regional accreditor and the host regional accreditor cooperate to evaluate an institution that delivers education at a physical site in the host accreditor’s region. Although the home region is solely responsible for final accreditation actions, as Strayer University opens and operates campuses in regions outside Middle States’ region, the host regional accreditors may elect to participate in the accreditation process of such expansion operations.

 

In addition to institutional accreditation, theStrayer University has obtained specialized or programmatic accreditation, or professional recognition, from the following organizations for specific programs: the Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (“ACBSP”), the Society for Human Resource Management (“SHRM”), the National Security Agency’s Committee on National Security Systems, and the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (“TEAC”), which was recently consolidated with the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education to form the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (“CAEP”). The baccalaureate degree program in nursing at Strayer University is accredited by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education 655 K Street, Suite 750, Washington, D.C. 20001, (202) 887-6791.(“CCNE”).

 

Capella University

Capella University has been institutionally accredited since 1997 by the Higher Learning Commission, a regional accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary of Education. In January 2015, Capella University’s accreditation with the Higher Learning Commission was reaffirmed. The reaffirmation enables Capella University to continue to participate in Title IV programs. The next reaffirmation of accreditation is scheduled to take place in 2022-2023.

The Higher Learning Commission is the same accrediting agency that accredits such universities as Northwestern University, the University of Chicago, the University of Minnesota and other degree-granting public and private colleges and universities in its region. 

The Higher Learning Commission is continuously developing new standards and approval processes under which it evaluates programs and institutions. Consistent with that approach, the Higher Learning Commission in August 2016 adopted policy changes which include giving the Commission more discretion to designate institutions to be in "financial distress” or under "government investigation.” Receipt of these designations could affect future accreditation status and eligibility for Title IV aid under the Department of Education’s new “financial responsibility” triggers. While the Company believes its strong reputation and compliance record will continue to place it in favorable standing under the new policy, there is sufficient breadth and discretion within the policy such that government investigation, litigation, or financial or other circumstances could result in an impact to our business from the application of the policies. In addition, in November 2017, the Higher Learning Commission announced policy changes to become effective September 1, 2019, mandating certain recruitment, admissions and related institutional practices, as well as guidelines for shared services relationships that took effect immediately. 

23


Table of Contents

In addition to institutional accreditation, Capella University has obtained specialized or programmatic accreditation, or professional recognition, for specific programs including from the following organizations: Computing Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (“ABET”); Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (“ACBSP”); Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Programs (“CACREP”); Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (“CAEP”); Commission on Accreditation for Marriage and Family Therapy Education (“COAMFTE”); Council on Social Work Education (“CSWE”); Project Management Institute - Global Accreditation Center for Project Management (“PMI-GAC”); the Society for Human Resource Management (“SHRM”). The BSN, MSN, and DNP degree programs at Capella University are accredited by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (“CCNE”). 

Shared Services Agreements

As part of the Merger, Strategic Education, Inc. entered into shared services agreements with both Universities to provide certain services, including but not limited to finance, legal, human resources, information technology, and marketing. The services are governed by Master Services Agreements, which provide, among other things, for oversight of the services by the governing boards of each University. The Company continues to look for additional opportunities to provide shared services to the two Universities, and believes that the agreements meet all regulatory and accreditation standards, including the Higher Learning Commission policy discussed above.

State Education Licensure

 

Licensure of Physical Campuses

 

The Higher Education Act and certain state laws require Strayer University and Capella University to be legally authorized to provide educational programs in the states in which the University isUniversities are physically located or demonstratesotherwise have a physical presence as defined by the state. We areStrayer University is authorized to offer programs by the applicable educational regulatory agencies in all states where ourStrayer’s physical campuses and online delivery facilities are located. We areStrayer University is dependent upon the authorization of each state where we areStrayer is physically located to allow usthe University to operate and to grant degrees, diplomas, or certificates to students in those states. We areStrayer University is subject to extensive regulation in each jurisdiction in which our campuses are located, including in 2017:2018: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington, D.C. We

Capella University is registered as a private institution with the Minnesota Office of Higher Education (“MOHE”) pursuant to Minnesota Statute sections 136A.61-131A.71, as required for most post-secondary private institutions that grant degrees at the associate level or above in Minnesota, and as required by the Higher Education Act to participate in Title IV programs.

Strayer University and Capella University will be subject to similar extensive regulation in those additional states in which we may expand our operations in the future. State laws and regulations affect our operations and may limit our ability to introduce educational programs or establish new campuses.

 

On October 29, 2010, the Department of Education adopted new regulations, effective July 1, 2011, that set new requirements on states for their authorization of schools for purposes of Title IV eligibility. We believe that every state above in which Strayer isthe Universities are authorized has processes in place that comply with these requirements.

 

Hackbright Academy is licensed to operate in the State of California by the Bureau for Private Post-secondary Education (“BPPE”). DevMountain is registered as a Post-Secondary Proprietary School with the Utah Department of Commerce, Division of Consumer Protection, and received a Certificate of Approval from the Texas Workforce Commission, Career Schools and Colleges, and has received a conditional license by the Arizona State Board for Private Post-secondary Education.

24


Table of Contents

Licensure of Online Programs

 

The increasing popularity and use of the internet and other technology for the delivery of education has led, and may continue to lead, to the adoption of new laws and regulatory practices in the United States or foreign countries or to the interpretation of existing laws and regulations to apply to such services. These new laws and interpretations may relate to issues such as the requirement that online education institutions be licensed as a school in one or more jurisdictions even where they have no physical location. New laws, regulations, or interpretations related to doing business over the internet could increase Strayer University’sthe Universities’ cost of doing business, affect itsthe Universities’ ability to increase enrollments and revenues, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

In April 2013, the Department of Education announced that it would address state authorization of distance education through negotiated rulemaking. While four negotiated rulemaking sessions were conducted from February through May 2014, no consensus was reached.

In June 2016, despite the lack of consensus at the negotiated rulemaking sessions, but as permitted by federal law, the Department of Education issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for public comment on the issue of state authorization for online programs. On December 19, 2016, the Department issued final regulations addressing state authorization of distance education, which arewere scheduled

17


Table of Contents

to become effective on July 1, 2018. On January 30, 2017, the new Administration indicated in a notice published in the Federal Register that it intends to take action in relation to this regulation, but it is unclear what that action will be or when it will be taken. TheThese regulations currently expected to be effective on July 1, 2018, will,include, among other things, requirethe requirement that an institution offering Title IV-eligible distance education or correspondence courses to be authorized by each state in which the institution enrolls students, if such authorization is required by the state. Institutions canmay obtain such authorization directly from the state or (except in California) through a state authorization reciprocity agreement. A state authorization reciprocity agreement is defined as an agreement between two or more states that authorizes an institution located and legally authorized in a state covered by the agreement to provide post-secondary education through distance education or correspondence courses to students in other states covered by the agreement and does not prohibit a participating state from enforcing its own laws with respect to higher education. The regulations also require institutions to document the state process for resolving complaints from students enrolled in programs offered through distance education or correspondence courses for each state in which such students reside.

 

In addition, the regulations require an institution to provide public and individualized disclosures to enrolled and prospective students regarding its programs offered solely through distance education or correspondence courses. The public disclosures would include state authorization for the program or course, the process for submitting complaints to relevant states, any adverse actions by a state or accrediting agency related to the distance education program or correspondence course within the past five years, refund policies specific to the state, and applicable licensure or certification requirements for a career that the program prepares a student to enter. An institution must disclose directly to all prospective students if a distance education or correspondence course does not meet the licensure or certification requirements for a state. An institution must disclose to each current and prospective student when an adverse action is taken against a distance education or correspondence program and any determination that a program ceases to meet licensure or certification requirements.

 

If an institution’s distance education program is found not to be in compliance, the institution may lose its ability to award Title IV funds for that distance education program.

 

On July 3, 2018, the Department announced an additional two-year delay, to July 2020, for implementation of the state authorization rules for distance and correspondence programs. On August 23, 2018, several plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in federal court claiming that the Department’s delay of the rules was unlawful under the federal Administrative Procedure Act, and a federal court has scheduled a hearing to consider the parties’ motions for summary judgment on April 11, 2019. We cannot predict the outcome of that litigation. On July 31, 2018, the Department announced its intention to establish a negotiated rulemaking committee to prepare proposed regulations on, among other things, state authorization, to address requirements related to programs offered through distance education or correspondence courses, including disclosures about such programs to enrolled and prospective students and other state authorization issues. Rulemaking began in January 2019 and is set to conclude in April 2019. We cannot predict what related regulations will be proposed or ultimately adopted.

Beginning July 1, 2017, California required out-of-state private post-secondary educational institutions that offer distance education to California residents to register with the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education, and Strayer University and Capella University have filed BPPE registration applications and received confirmation of the registration.

25


Table of Contents

State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement

 

Varying state regulations, fees, and paperwork embedded in the many different state approaches to regulation of post-secondary institutions have limited the ability to grow across state lines to offer students high quality choices for education and have hindered national workforce initiatives. As a solution to the ever-growing complexity of the regulatory oversight of institutions of higher learning on a state-by-state basis, the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (“SARA”) has emerged to aid in the advancement of distance education.

 

SARA is intended to make it easier for students to take online courses offered by post-secondary institutions based in another state, while also facilitating more effective and efficient oversight and monitoring processes nationally for the benefit of states and institutions. On March 6, 2015 and December 2, 2016, respectively, Capella and Strayer UniversityUniversities became a participantparticipants in SARA. As a participantparticipants in SARA, Strayer Universitythe Universities may offer online courses and other forms of distance education to students in any participating SARA state in which Strayer doesthe Universities do not have a physical location or a physical presence as defined by the state without having to seek any new state institutional approval beyond itstheir home state (Washington,states (Minnesota and Washington, D.C.), respectively). Strayer University’sThe Universities’ home state,states, in turn, will continually monitor the institution’s compliance with SARA standards. With this initiative, Strayer Universitythe Universities will be able to expand its distance education offerings with increased consistency and ease. The only state that does not now participate in SARA is California.

 

The reciprocity agreement does not affect Strayer Universityuniversity operations that constitute a physical presence in a particular state, and the UniversityUniversities will continue to follow individual state regulations for its on-ground campuses and activities.To the extent that such approval is required by state law, the UniversityUniversities also must obtain approval from each state that is not a SARA member (i.e., California and Massachusetts)(currently only California) if the University seeksUniversities seek to enroll students from those states in the University’sUniversities’ distance education programs. At this time, SARA does not deal with professional licensing board approval for programs leading to state licensing in fields such as nursing, teacher education, psychology, and the like, and Strayer Universitythe Universities must seek such approvals on a state-by-state basis, as needed.

18


Table of Contents

 

Other Approvals

 

Strayer University isand Capella University are approved by appropriate authorities for the education of active duty military personnel and qualifying family members, veterans and members of the selected reserve and their spouses and dependents, as well as for the rehabilitation of veterans. In addition, Strayer University is authorized by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to admit foreign students for study in the United States subject to applicable requirements. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, working with the U.S. Department of State, has implemented a mandatory electronic reporting system for schools that enroll foreign students and exchange visitors. TheStrayer University is also authorized to participate in state financial aid programs in Pennsylvania, Florida, and Vermont. Capella University is authorized to participate in the Minnesota GI Bill program.

 

State Professional Licensure

States have specific requirements that an individual must satisfy in order to be licensed as a professional in a specified field. Capella University graduates often seek to obtain professional licensure in their chosen fields following graduation because it will enhance employment opportunities or they are legally required to do so for employment purposes. Their success in obtaining licensure depends on several factors, including each individual’s personal and professional qualifications as well as other factors related to the degree or program completed, such as:

·

Whether the institution and the program were approved by the state in which the graduate seeks licensure, or by a professional association;

·

Whether the program from which the learner graduated and the curriculum completed meets all state requirements; and

·

Whether the institution and/or the specific program is accredited.

26


Table of Contents

Professional licensure requirements can vary by state and may change over time. Capella University has a team dedicated to professional licensure that works directly with learners. The licensure team develops and maintains extensive resources to inform learners of unique state licensing requirements prior to enrollment and throughout their program. The University’s catalog and websites also describe the requirements for obtaining professional licensure, paired with specific disclaimers that reiterate learner responsibility for licensure outcomes.

Capella’s licensure team works directly with licensing authorities to try to resolve barriers to licensure for its alumni. The team also assists alumni with exploring alternative options to achieve licensure, including completing additional coursework at Capella or at another institution.

Capella University makes no representation, warranty or guarantee that successful completion of the course of study will result in the learner obtaining the necessary licensure or certification. Compliance with state or professional licensure or certification requirements is the learner’s sole responsibility.

Financing Student Education

 

Students finance their education at Strayer University educationand Capella University in a variety of ways, and historically about three quarters of students participated in one or more Title IV programs. Many financial aid programs are designed to assist eligible students whose financial resources are inadequate to meet the cost of education. With these programs, financial aid is awarded on the basis of financial need, generally defined under the Higher Education Act as the difference between the cost of attending a program of study and the amount a student reasonably can be expected to contribute to those expenses. All recipients of federal student financial aid must maintain a satisfactory grade point average (“GPA”) and progress in a timely manner toward completion of a program of study.

 

In addition, many of our working adult students finance their own education or receive full or partial tuition reimbursement from their employers. Congress has enacted several tax credits for students pursuing higher education and has provided for a tax deduction for interest on student loans and exclusions from income of certain tuition reimbursement amounts. Eligible students at Strayer University or Capella University may also participate in educational assistance programs administered by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the State of Florida, the State of Vermont, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) (and related state agencies), the U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”), and various private organizations. Eligible students at Strayer University may also participate in educational assistance programs administered by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the State of Florida, and the State of Vermont. Some Capella University students may qualify to participate in the Minnesota GI Bill program.

 

Under the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 20092008 (as amended August 1, 2011)amended), sometimes referred to as the “New GI Bill,” eligible veterans may receive, among other benefits, tuition benefits up to the net cost to the student (after accounting for state and federal aid, scholarships, institutional aid, fee waivers, and similar assistance), subject to a cap of $22,085$23,672 for non-public domestic institutions for 2017-2018.2018-2019. In addition, eligible students pursuing an educational program solely through distance learning are eligible to receive a housing stipend equal toof $825 per month, half the amount available to students attending certain classroom-based programs or programs that combine classroom learning and distance learning.

 

On August 16, 2017, the President signed into law the Harry W. Colmery Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2017, commonly known as the Forever“Forever GI Bill.Bill”. The law makes several changes to the administration of VA education benefits. Among other things, for service members who left the military after January 1, 2013, the bill removes the requirement that they use their Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits within 15 years after their last 90-day period of active-duty service. The bill also alters the way the VA calculates eligibility for VA education benefits by providing additional benefits to service members with at least 90 days but less than six months of active-duty service. Additionally, the bill will restore VA education benefits to students who were enrolled in schools that closed after January 2015 if their credits did not transfer.

 

Strayer University participatesand Capella University participate in DOD military tuition assistance programs under a  MemorandumMemoranda of Understanding (“MOU”). Strayer University’s MOU was executed on September 5, 2014. Capella University’s MOU was executed on October 7, 2014. Service members of the United States Armed Forces are eligible to

27


Table of Contents

receive tuition assistance from their branch of service through the DOD military tuition assistance programs. Under the Memorandum of Understanding, the University agreesUniversities agree to comply with DOD rules and procedures regarding the receipt of tuition assistance on behalf of active duty military personnel (and qualifying family members) in attendance at the University.

 

19


Table of Contents

Title IV Programs

 

Strayer University maintainsand Capella University maintain eligibility for itstheir students to participate in the following Title IV programs:

 

·

Federal Grants. Grants under the Federal Pell Grant program are available to eligible students based on financial need and other factors.

 

·

Campus-Based Programs. The campus-based Title IV programs include the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant program, the Federal Perkins Loan, and the Federal Work-Study Program. Neither Strayer University nor Capella University actively participates in the Federal Perkins Loan program, which expired on September 30, 2017. In addition, Strayer University does not actively participate in the Perkins Loan or the Federal Work-Study Program. The Perkins Loan Program expired on September 30, 2017.

 

·

Federal Direct Student Loans. Under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, the Department of Education makes loans directly to students and their parents. Undergraduate students who demonstrate financial need may qualify for a subsidized loan. The federal government pays the interest on a subsidized loan while the student is in school and during any approved periods of deferment, after which the student’s obligation to repay the loan begins. Unsubsidized loans are available to students who do not qualify for a subsidized loan or, in some cases, in addition to a subsidized loan. PLUS loans, including Graduate PLUS loans, are unsubsidized loans available in amounts up to the total cost of attendance less any other financial aid.

 

Federal Financial Aid Regulation

 

To be eligible to participate in Title IV programs, Strayer Universityand Capella Universities must comply with specific standards and procedures set forth in the Higher Education Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the Department of Education. As part of those participation standards, the Department of Education determines whether, among other things, the institution meets certain standards of administrative capability and financial responsibility. The institutioninstitutions must also follow extensive Department of Education rules regarding the awarding and processing of funds issued under Title IV programs. Some of the key provisions regarding institutional eligibility and processing federal financial aid are described below.

 

Program Participation Agreement

 

Each institution participating in Title IV programs must enter into a Program Participation Agreement with the Department.Department of Education. Under the agreement, the institution agrees to follow the Department’s rules and regulations governing Title IV programs. On October 11, 2017, the Department and Strayer University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Strayer University’s continued participation in Title IV programs with full certification through June 30, 2021. On January 18, 2019, consistent with standard procedure upon a Title IV institution’s change of ownership, the Department and Capella University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Capella University’s continued participation in Title IV programs with provisional certification through December 31, 2022.

 

Provisional Certification

 

In certain circumstances, the Department of Education may certify an institution’s continuing eligibility to participate in Title IV programs on a provisional basis for up to three complete award years (July 1 – June 30) from the date of provisional certification. During the period of provisional certification, the institution must comply with any

28


Table of Contents

additional conditions included in its program participation agreement.agreement, which typically require approval by the Department of Education for establishment of an additional location, increase in the level of academic offering, and addition of any educational program (including degree, non-degree, or short-term training programs) before awarding or disbursing Title IV aid to students enrolled at such a location or in such a program. If the Department of Education determines that a provisionally certified institution is unable to meet its responsibilities under its program participation agreement, it may revoke or further condition the institution’s certification to participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process protections for the institution than if it were fully certified. Should the Department of Education revoke eligibility during the provisional period, the institution may request reconsideration and the Secretary of Education’s decision whether or not revocation is warranted constitutes final agency action. Strayer University is operating under full certification. Consistent with standard procedure following a change of control, Capella University is operating under provisional certification.

 

20


Table of Contents

Administrative Capability

 

Department of Education regulations specify extensive criteria by which an institution must establish that it has the requisite administrative capability to participate in Title IV programs. To meet the administrative capability standards, an institution, among other things, must: (1) comply with all applicable Title IV program regulations; (2) have cohort default rates below specified levels; (3) have acceptable methods for defining and measuring the satisfactory academic progress of its learners; (4) have various procedures in place for safeguarding federal funds; (4)(5) not be, and not have any principal or affiliate who is, debarred or suspended from federal contracting or engaging in activity that is cause for debarment or suspension; (5)(6) submit in a timely manner all reports and financial statements required by the regulations; and (6)(7) not otherwise appear to lack administrative capability.

 

If an institution fails to satisfy any of these criteria or any other Department of Education regulation, the Department of Education may:

·

Require the repayment of Title IV funds;

·

Transfer the institution from the Department of Education’s advance system of receiving Title IV program funds to its reimbursement system, under which an institution must disburse its own funds to learners and document the learners’ eligibility for Title IV program funds before receiving such funds from the Department of Education;

·

Place the institution on provisional certification status; or

·

Commence a proceeding to impose a fine or to limit, suspend or terminate the participation of the institution in Title IV programs.

Financial Responsibility

 

The Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations establish extensive standards of financial responsibility that institutions such as Strayer Universityand Capella Universities must satisfy in order to participate in Title IV programs. These standards generally require that an institution provide the services described in its official publications and statements, properly administer Title IV programs in which it participates, and meet all of its financial obligations, including required refunds and any repayments to the Department of Education for debts and liabilities incurred in programs administered by the Department of Education.

 

Department of Education standards utilize a complex formula to assess financial responsibility. The standards focus on three financial ratios: (1) equity ratio (which measures the institution’s capital resources and ability to borrow); (2) primary reserve ratio (which measures the institution’s financial viability and liquidity); and (3) net income ratio (which measures the institution’s ability to operate at a profit or within its means). An institution’s financial ratios must yield a composite score of at least 1.5 for the institution to be deemed financially responsible without alternative measures and further federal oversight. For both of the Universities, the Department evaluates financial responsibility at the parent level, based on review of SEI’s financial statements. We have applied the financial responsibility standards to our

29


Table of Contents

financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, and based on our calculated composite score and other relevant factors, we believe we meet the Department of Education’s financial responsibility standards.

 

On November 1, 2016, the Department of Education released a new regulation, which was scheduled to take effect July 1, 2017, which would make significant changes to the financial responsibility criteria. Under the final regulation, an institution may no longer be considered financially responsible if one or more of a list of “triggering events” occurs. The Department of Education would automatically determine that an institution is not financially responsible if, among other things, the institution receives certain warnings from the SEC, fails to timely file required reports in a timely manner, or has a cohort default rate of 30% or greater for each of the two most recent official calculations. The Department of Education would also determine that an institution is not financially responsible if certain triggering events, such as a lawsuit against the institution, an accrediting agency’s requirement that the institution submit a teach-out plan, or potential loss of Title IV eligibility for gainful employment programs, result in the institution’s recalculated composite score to be less than 1.0. Under the released regulation, theThe Department of Education could also invoke certain “discretionary” triggering events, such as citation by a state agency or accrediting agency for failure to satisfy the agency’s standards, to determine that an institution is not financially responsible. The Department has delayedannounced a series of delays to the implementation of the regulation until July 1, 2019, but following a judge’s decision in related litigation, the implementationregulations went into effect as of this regulation, pendingOctober 16, 2018. On July 31, 2018, the outcomeDepartment published a notice of proposed rulemaking that, among other things, would amend the Department’s financial responsibility provisions in several respects. The proposed rules would identify certain conditions or events that have or may have an ongoing negotiated rulemaking process relatedadverse material effect on the institution’s financial condition, in response to which the underlying subject matter.Department would or could require that the institution submit some form of financial protection. We cannot predict what regulations will be proposed or ultimately will be adopted.

 

Student Loan Defaults

 

Under the Higher Education Act, an educational institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all of the Title IV programs if defaults on the repayment of Direct Loan or Federal Family Education Loan (“FFEL”) Program loans by its students exceed certain levels. The Department of Education uses a specific methodology to determine default rates and imposes varying sanctions based upon the results of that calculation. As discussed below, the cohort default rate calculation and threshold for regulatory sanctions changed effective 2014 as a result of the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act through the Higher Education Opportunity Act (“HEOA”), which was effective August 18, 2008.

21


Table of Contents

The Department of Education calculates a rate of student defaults (known as a cohort default rate) for each institution with 30 or more borrowers entering repayment in a given federal fiscal year. The Department of Education includes in the cohort all student borrowers at the institution who entered repayment on any Direct or FFEL Program loan during that year. The cohort default rate is the percentage of those borrowers who become subject to their repayment obligation in the relevant federal fiscal year and default by the end of the second federal fiscal year following that fiscal year, resulting in a three-year cohort default rate. Because of the need to collect data on defaults, the Department of Education publishes cohort default rates three years in arrears; for example, in the fall of 2017,2018, the Department of Education issued cohort default rates for federal fiscal year 2014.2015.

 

The Department of Education may take adverse action against an institution if it has excessive cohort default rates, including the following:

 

·

If an institution’s cohort default rate is 30% or more in a given fiscal year, the institution will be required to assemble a “default prevention task force” and submit to the Department of Education a default improvement plan.

 

·

If an institution’s cohort default rate exceeds 30% for two consecutive years, the institution will be required to review, revise, and resubmit its default improvement plan.

 

·

If an institution’s cohort default rate exceeds 30% for two out of three consecutive years, the Department of Education may subject the institution to provisional certification.

 

·

If an institution’s cohort default rate is equal to or greater than 30% for each of the three most recent federal fiscal years for which data are available, the institution will be ineligible to participate in the Direct Loan Program and Federal Pell Grant Program.

 

An institution generally loses eligibility to participate in Title IV programs if its most recent cohort default rate is greater than 40%, and institutions. Institutions with a cohort default rate equal to or greater than 15% for any of the three most recent fiscal years for which data are available are subject to a 30-day delayed disbursement period for first-year, first-time

30


Table of Contents

undergraduate borrowers. Although Strayer University has not had a cohort default rate at or above 15% in any of the three most recent fiscal years, Strayer University voluntarily disburses Direct Loans in this manner.

 

Strayer’sStrayer University and Capella University’s official three-year cohort default rates for 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2014,2015, as well as the average official three-year cohort default rates for proprietary institutions nationally, were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Average

 

    

Strayer University

    

Proprietary Institutions

 

    

Strayer University

    

Capella University

    

Proprietary Institutions

 

2015

 

10.6%

 

6.5%

 

15.6%

 

2014

 

13.2%

 

15.5%

 

 

13.2%

 

6.9%

 

15.5%

 

2013

 

11.3%

 

15.0%

 

 

11.3%

 

6.5%

 

15.0%

 

2012

 

11.6%

 

15.8%

 

 

As part of itsthe Universities’ compliance programprograms related to the cohort default rate, Strayer University providesand Capella University provide entrance and exit counseling to itstheir students and engagesengage the services of a third partyparties to counsel students once they are in repayment status regarding their repayment obligations.

 

The 90/10 Rule

 

A requirement of the Higher Education Act, commonly referred to as the 90/10 Rule, applies only to proprietary institutions of higher education, which includes Strayer University and Capella University. Under this rule, a proprietary institution is prohibited from deriving more than 90% of its revenues (as revenues are computed under the Department of Education’s methodology) from Title IV funds on a cash accounting basis (except for certain institutional loans) for any fiscal year.

 

A proprietary institution of higher education that violates the 90/10 Rule for any fiscal year will be placed on provisional certification for up to two fiscal years. Proprietary institutions of higher education that violate the 90/10 Rule

22


Table of Contents

for two consecutive fiscal years will become ineligible to participate in Title IV programs for at least two fiscal years and will be required to demonstrate compliance with Title IV eligibility and certification requirements for at least two fiscal years prior to resuming Title IV program participation. In addition, the Department of Education discloses on its website any proprietary institution of higher education that fails to meet the 90/10 requirement, and reports annually to Congress the relevant ratios for each proprietary institution of higher education.

 

Using the statutory formula, Strayer University derived approximately 75%76.0% of its cash-basis revenues from Title IV program funds in 2016.2017. Capella University derived approximately 75.5% of its cash-basis revenues from Title IV program funds in 2017. Our computation for 20172018 has not yet been finalized and audited; however, we believe we will remain in compliance with the 90/10 Rule requirement.

 

The key components of non-Title IV revenue for Strayer University and Capella University are individual student payments, employer tuition reimbursement payments, veterans’ education benefits,military tuition assistance, vocational rehabilitation funds, private loans, state grants, and scholarships. In the past, certain members of Congress have proposed to revise the 90/10 Rule to count DOD tuition assistance and veterans’ education benefits along with Title IV revenue toward the 90% limit and to reduce the limit to 85% of total revenue. In the context of Higher Education Act reauthorization, other members of Congress recently have proposed legislation that would eliminate the 90/10 Rule. We cannot predict whether or how the recent changechanges in Administration and Congress will affect the 90/10 Rule.

 

Restrictions on Incentive Compensation

 

As a part of an institution’s program participation agreement with the Department of Education and in accordance with the Higher Education Act and Title IV regulations, the institution may not provide any commission, bonus, or other incentive payment based in any part, directly or indirectly, upon success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any person or entity engaged in any student recruitment, admissions, or financial aid-awarding activity. The rule applies to all employees at an institution who are engaged in or responsible for any student recruitment or admission activity or making decisions regarding the award of financial aid. The Department of Education has interpreted the regulation not to apply to certain high-level employees, including senior managers and executive level employees who are involved only

31


Table of Contents

in the development of policy and do not engage in individual student contact. Merit-based adjustments to employee compensation may be made if they are not based in any part, directly or indirectly, upon success in securing enrollments or the award of financial aid.

 

Failure to comply with the incentive payment rule could result in loss of certification to participate in federal student financial aid programs, limitations on participation in the federal student financial aid programs, or financial penalties. In June 2015, the Department of Education announced in a memorandum that it willwould revise its approach to measuring damages for noncompliance with the incentive payment prohibition. The Department of Education will calculate the amount of institutional liability based on the cost to the Department of the Title IV funds improperly received by the institution, including the cost to the Department of all Title IV funds received by the institution over a period of time if those funds were obtained through implementation of a policy or practice in which students were recruited in violation of the incentive payment prohibition. We believe we are in compliance with the regulation.

 

Gainful Employment

 

Under the Higher Education Act, a proprietary institution offering programs of study other than a baccalaureate degree in liberal arts (for which there is a limited statutory exception) must prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation. On October 31, 2014, the Department of Education published final regulations related to gainful employment. The regulation went into effect on July 1, 2015, with the exception of new disclosure requirements, which generally went into effect January 1, 2017, although some portions of those requirements have now been delayed until July 1, 2018.2019. In addition, in early 2018, the Department has convened a new negotiated rulemaking related to gainful employment. On August 14, 2018, the Department published a notice of proposed rulemaking which proposed rescinding the gainful employment regulations and

23


Table of Contents

updating the College Scorecard or a similar web-based tool to provide program-level outcomes for all higher education programs at all institutions that participate in the Title IV programs. Public comments were accepted through September 13, 2018, and the Department has held negotiated rulemaking sessions.indicated it is currently drafting final rules. We cannot predict what new regulations will be proposed or ultimately will be adopted.

 

The current regulations include two debt-to-earnings measures, consisting of an annual income rate and a discretionary income rate. The annual income rate measures student debt in relation to earnings, and the discretionary income rate measures student debt in relation to discretionary income. A program passes if the program’s graduates:

 

·

have an annual income rate ratio that does not exceed 8%; or

 

·

have a discretionary income rate that does not exceed 20%.

 

In addition, a program that does not pass either of the debt-to-earnings metrics and that has an annual income rate between 8% and 12% or a discretionary income rate between 20% and 30%, is considered to be in a warning zone. A program fails if the program’s graduates have an annual income rate of 12% or greater and a discretionary income rate of 30% or greater. A program would become Title IV-ineligible for three years if it fails both metrics for two out of three consecutive years or fails to pass at least one metric for four consecutive award years. The regulations provide a means by which an institution may challenge the Department of Education’s calculation of any of the debt metrics prior to loss of Title IV eligibility.

 

If an institution is notified by the Secretary of Education that a program could become ineligible, based on its final rates, for the next award year:

 

·

the institution must provide a warning with respect to the program to students and prospective students indicating, among other things, that students may not be able to use Title IV funds to attend or continue in the program; and

 

·

the institution must not enroll, register, or enter into a financial commitment with a prospective student until a specified time after providing the warning to the prospective student.

 

32


Table of Contents

On January 8, 2017, Strayer and Capella Universities received itstheir final 2015 debt-to-earnings measures. None of Strayer’stheir programs failed the debt-to-earnings metrics. Two active Strayer University programs, the Associate in Arts in Accounting and Associate in Arts in Business Administration, arewere “in the zone,” which means eachand one active Capella University program, the Masters of Science in Marriage and Family Counseling/Therapy, was “in the zone.” Each of those three programs remains fully eligible unless (1) eitherthe program has a combination of zone and failing designations for four consecutive years, in which case it would become Title IV-ineligible in the fifth year; or (2) eitherthe program fails the metrics for two out of three consecutive years, in which case the program could become ineligible for the following award year. The Department has not yet released 2016 debt-to-earnings measures, and it is unclear when the Department intendshas announced that because it no longer has a data-sharing agreement with the U.S. Social Security Administration to do so.receive earnings data, the Department is currently unable to calculate the debt-to-earnings measures under the gainful employment regulations.  

 

The current regulation also requires institutions annually to report student- and program-level data to the Department of Education and comply with additional disclosure requirements. Final regulations adopted by the Department of Education, which generally became effective on July 1, 2011, require an institution to use a template designed by the Department of Education to disclose to prospective students, with respect to each gainful employment program, occupations that the program prepares students to enter,enter; total cost of the program,program; on-time graduation rate,rate; job placement rate, if applicable,applicable; and the median loan debt of program completers for the most recently completed award year. The regulation that became effective July 1, 2015 expands upon those existing disclosure requirements, and institutions were required to comply with the new template by July 1, 2017. Strayer UniversityThe Universities timely complied by posting information in the new template. On January 19, 2018, the Department of Education released the most recent version of the disclosure template, which institutions mustwere required to adopt on or before April 6, 2018. Unlike the previous version, the new template does not require institutions to disclose median earnings data or room and board charges. On June 30, 2017, the Department of Education announced that it willwould allow institutions until July 1, 2018 to comply with certain disclosure requirements in the final regulations, including requirements to include a link to the disclosure template in promotional materials and to distribute directly a copy of the disclosure template to prospective students. On June 18, 2018, the Department of Education further delayed these disclosure requirements until July 1, 2019.

 

In addition, the gainful employment regulation requires institutions to certify, among other things, that each eligible gainful employment program is programmatically accredited if programmatic accreditation is required by a federal governmental entity or a state

24


Table of Contents

governmental entity of a state in which it is located or in which the institution is otherwise required to obtain state approval.approval to offer the program in that state. Institutions also must certify that each eligible program satisfies the applicable educational prerequisites for professional licensure or certification requirements in each state in which it is located or is otherwise required to obtain state approval, so that a student who completes the program and seeks employment in that state qualifies to take any licensure or certification exam that is needed for the student to practice or find employment in an occupation that the program prepares students to enter. The University hasUniversities have timely made the required certification.

 

Under the gainful employment regulation, an institution may establish a new program’s Title IV eligibility by updating the list of the institution’s programs maintained by the Department of Education. However, an institution may not update its list of eligible programs to include a failing or zone program that the institution voluntarily discontinued or became ineligible, or a gainful employment program that is substantially similar to such a program, until three years after the loss of eligibility or discontinuance.

 

The requirements associated with the gainful employment regulations may substantially increase our administrative burdens and could affect our program offerings, student enrollment, persistence, and retention. Further, although the regulations provide opportunities for an institution to correct any potential deficiencies in a program prior to the loss of Title IV eligibility, the continuing eligibility of our academic programs may be affected by factors beyond management’s control, such as changes in our graduates’ employment and income levels, changes in student borrowing levels, increases in interest rates, and various other factors. Even if we were able to correct any deficiency in the gainful employment metrics in a timely manner, the disclosure requirements associated with a program’s failure to meet at least one metric may adversely affect student enrollments in that program and may adversely affect the reputation of our institution.institutions.

 

33


Table of Contents

Return of Federal Funds

 

Under the Higher Education Act’s return-of-funds provision, an institution must return Title IV funds to a Title IV program in a timely manner if a student received funds from that program, but did not earn them due to the student’s withdrawal from the institution. In order to determine if funds should be returned, the institution must first determine the amount of Title IV program funds that the student earned. If the student attends the institution, but withdraws during the first 60% of any period of enrollment or payment period, the amount of Title IV program funds that the student earned is equal to a pro rata portion of the funds for which the student would otherwise be eligible. Strayer University isand Capella University are required to measure the last day of attendance based on official attendance records, and “attendance” for online classes must include participation in an academically-related activity. Strayer University’sThe Universities’ systems allow for measurement on this basis. If the student withdraws after the 60% point, then the student has earned 100% of the Title IV program funds. The institution must return to the appropriate Title IV programs, in a specified order, the lesser of the unearned Title IV program funds or the institutional charges incurred by the student for the period multiplied by the percentage of unearned Title IV program funds. An institution must return the funds no later than 45 days after the date that the institution determines that a student withdrew.

 

If the funds are not returned in a timely manner, an institution may be subject to adverse action, including being required to submit an irrevocable letter of credit equal to 25% of the refunds the institution should have made in its most recently completed fiscal year. Under Department of Education regulations, ifIf late returns of Title IV program funds constitute 5% or more of students sampled in the institution’s annual compliance audit for either of its two most recently completed fiscal years, an institution generally must submit an irrevocablesuch a letter of credit payable to the Secretary of Education.

 

Misrepresentation

 

Under the Higher Education Act, the Department of Education may fine, suspend, or terminate an institution’s participation in Title IV programs if it engages in substantial misrepresentation of the nature of its educational program, its financial charges, or the employability of its graduates. The Program Integrity Regulations,Department’s related regulations, which took effect July 1, 2011, set forth the types of activities that constitute misrepresentation and describe the adverse actions that the Department of Education may take if it finds that an institution or a third party that provides educational programs, marketing, advertising, recruiting, or admissions services to the institution engaged in substantial misrepresentation. The rule specifies the types of statements that can subject the institution to liability for misrepresentation, as well as the

25


Table of Contents

nature and form of misleading statements. The rule provides that an institution may not describe the eligible institution’s participation in Title IV programs in a manner that suggests Department of Education approval or endorsement of the quality of its educational programs by the Department of Education.

 

On June 5, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Department of Education’s expansion of the definition of misrepresentation to include “any statement that has the likelihood or tendency to deceive or confuse” was unsupported by law, and thus vacated that portion of the regulation. In response to the court’s ruling, on September 20, 2013, the Department of Education published technical amendments to the regulation. As part of the Department’s 2016 promulgation of the Borrower Defenses to Repayment regulation, the Department changed the definition of misrepresentation for Title IV regulations to include any statement that “has the likelihood or tendency to mislead under the circumstances.” The newly expanded definition also includes “any statement that omits information in such a way as to make the statement false, erroneous, or misleading.” This regulation was published on November 1, 2016 and was scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2017. However, theThe Department has delayedannounced that it would delay implementation until July 1, 2019, pendingbut following a judge’s decision in related litigation, the outcomeregulations went into effect as of ongoing negotiatedOctober 16, 2018. On July 31, 2018, the Department published a notice of proposed rulemaking process, which may revisitthat, among other things, revisits the definition of misrepresentation. We cannot predict what definition of misrepresentation ultimately will be proposed or adopted.

 

Borrower Defenses to Repayment

 

Pursuant to the Higher Education Act and following negotiated rulemaking, on November 1, 2016, the Department of Education released a final regulation specifying the acts or omissions of an institution that a borrower may assert as a defense to repayment of a loan made under the Direct Loan Program and the consequences of such borrower defenses for borrowers, institutions, and the Secretary of Education. Under the regulation, for Direct Loans disbursed after July 1, 2017, a student borrower may assert a defense to repayment if: (1) the student borrower obtained a state or federal court judgment against the institution; (2) the institution failed to perform on a contract with the student; and/or (3) the institution committed a “substantial misrepresentation” on which the borrower reasonably relied to his or her detriment.

34


Table of Contents

These defenses are asserted through claims submitted to the Department of Education, and the Department has the authority to issue a final decision. In addition, the regulation permits the Department to grant relief to an individual or group of individuals, including individuals who have not applied to the Department seeking relief. If a defense is successfully raised, the Department has discretion to initiate action to collect from an institution the amount of losses incurred based on the borrower defense. The new regulation also amends the rules concerning discharge of federal student loans when a school or campus closes and prohibits pre-dispute arbitration agreements and class action waivers for borrower defense-type claims. On January 19, 2017, the Department of Education issued a final rule with request for comments, updating the hearing procedures for actions to establish liability against an institution of higher education and establishing procedures for recovery proceedings under the borrower defense regulations. OnSeveral times between June 16, 2017 and February 2018, the Department of Education announced that in lightdelays until July 1, 2019 of the existence and potential consequences of pending litigation that had been brought in federal court to challenge the regulations, it had decided to postpone indefinitely the implementation of certain provisionsportions of the regulations. Alsofinal regulations published in November 2016, including those portions of the regulations that establish a new federal standard and a process for determining whether a Direct Loan borrower has a defense to repayment of a Direct Loan based on an act or omission of an institution. However, in October 2018, a judge denied a request to delay implementation of portions of the regulations, and as a result the regulations went into effect as of October 16, 2018 and will remain in effect until such time as any new regulations developed under the current rulemaking process, described below, are effective. We are unable to predict the manner and effect of full implementation of the final regulations published in November 2016, including because their scope is broad and the Department has said it will issue guidance about its plans to implement the regulations while further rulemaking remains in progress. 

On June 16, 2017, the Department of Education announced its intent to convene a negotiated rulemaking committee to develop proposed regulations related to borrower defense and to address certain other related matters. On October 24, 2017, the Department of Education delayed until July 1, 2018 the effective date of the provisions of the regulations identified in the June 16, 2017 notice, and thereafter implemented a further delay until July 1, 2019pending the outcome of an ongoing negotiated rulemaking process. The negotiated rulemaking committee held meetings in November 2017, January 2018, and February 2018.

On July 31, 2018, the Department published a notice of proposed rulemaking that, among other things, would establish a new federal standard for evaluating, and a process for adjudicating, borrower defenses to repayment of loans made under the Direct Loan Program on or after July 1, 2019. Under the proposed standard, an individual borrower could assert a defense to repayment based on the institution’s statement, act, or omission that is false, misleading, or deceptive. To be eligible for relief, the borrower would be required to demonstrate that the misrepresentation (1) was made with knowledge of its false, misleading, or deceptive nature or with a reckless disregard for the truth, (2) was relied upon by the borrower in making an enrollment decision, and (3) caused the student financial harm. The Department would have discretion to determine the appropriate amount of relief. The proposed regulations would make changes to the Department’s eligibility requirements for granting loan discharges to students who had enrolled at institutions or locations that subsequently close. The proposed regulations also would require that institutions that require students to enter into pre-dispute arbitration agreements or class action waivers as a condition of enrollment disclose those requirements in an easily accessible format.

In addition, the proposed regulations would amend the Department’s financial responsibility provisions in several respects. The proposed rules would identify certain conditions or events that have or may have an adverse material effect on the institution’s financial condition, in response to which the Department would or could require that the institution submit some form of financial protection for the Department. The proposed rules would also update the Department’s composite score calculations to reflect recent changes in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) accounting standards and provide a phase-in process to enable the Department to update its composite score regulations through additional negotiated rulemaking. The Department accepted public comments on the notice of proposed rulemaking through August 30, 2018. Capella University and Strayer University provided public comments on August 30. The Department did not publish the final rule by November 1, 2018, the date by which the Department’s master calendar rule dictates a final regulation must be published to take effect the following July. The Department has indicated it plans to reissue a notice of proposed rulemaking for public comment in 2019. We cannot predict what new regulations will be proposed or ultimately will be adopted.

 

Third-Party Servicers

 

Department of Education regulations permit an institution to enter into a written contract with a third-party servicer for the administration of any aspect of the institution’s participation in Title IV programs. The third-party servicer must, among other obligations, comply with Title IV requirements and be jointly and severally liable with the institution to the

35


Table of Contents

Secretary of Education for any violation by the servicer of any Title IV provision. An institution must report to the Department of Education new contracts or any significant modifications to contracts with third-party servicers as well as other matters related to third-party servicers. Strayer University hasand Capella University have written contracts with third-party servicers to perform activities related to Strayer University’s and Capella University’s participation in Title IV programs. Strayer University also has a

26


Table of Contents

contract with Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. for processing stipends due to students. For loan default prevention, Strayer University contracts with i3 Group, LLC.LLC and Capella University contracts with ECMC. Strayer believesUniversity and Capella University believe that itstheir third-party servicer contracts comply with the regulations, and wethey have reported such contracts to the Department of Education.

 

Lender Relationships

 

As part of an institution’s program participation agreement with the Department of Education, the institution must adopt a code of conduct pertaining to student loans. Strayer University hasand Capella University have a code of conduct that it believeswe believe complies with the provisions of the Higher Education Act in all material respects. In addition to the code of conduct requirements that apply to institutions, the Higher Education Act contains provisions that apply to lenders, prohibiting lenders from engaging in certain activities as they interact with institutions.

 

Restrictions on Adding Locations and Educational Programs

 

State requirements and accrediting agency standards can limit or slow the ability of Strayer Universitythe Universities to establish legally authorized additional locations and programs. Most states require approval before institutions can add new programs, campuses, or teaching locations. Middle States requires its accredited institutions to notify it in advance of implementing new programs or locations, which may require additional approval. At its discretion, Middle States may also conduct site visits to additional locations to ensure thatevaluate whether accredited institutions that experience rapid growth in the number of additional locations, among other reasons, maintain educational quality. All new Strayer University campus locations require Middle States approval before students are enrolled, and the Higher Education Act requires Middle States to monitor institutions with significant enrollment growth. Under Strayer University’s full certification,The Higher Learning Commission, the DepartmentMinnesota Office of Higher Education, must be notified within ten days of a new campus location, level of academic offering, and non-degreeother state educational regulatory agencies that license or authorize Capella University and its degree programs but prior approval is not required.require institutions to notify them in advance of implementing new programs and, upon notification, may undertake a review of the institution’s licensure, authorization or accreditation.

 

The Higher Education Act requires proprietary institutions of higher education to be in full operation for two years before qualifying to participate in Title IV programs. However, the applicable regulations in many circumstances permit an institution that is already qualified to participate in Title IV programs to establish additional locations that are exempt from the two-year rule. These additional locations generally may qualify immediately for participation in Title IV programs, unless the location was acquired from another institution that has ceased offering educational programs at that location and has Title IV liabilities that it is not repaying in accordance with an agreement to do so, and the acquiring institution does not agree, among other matters, to be responsible for certain liabilities of the acquired institution. The new location must satisfy all other applicable requirements for institutional eligibility, including approval of the additional location by the relevant state authorizing agency and the institution’s accrediting agency. Any Strayer University or Capella University expansion plans assume its continued ability to establish new campuses as additional locations of Strayer University under such applicable regulations and thereby avoid incurring the two-year delay in participation in Title IV programs. The loss of state authorization or accreditation of Strayer Universitya university or an existing campus, or the failure of Strayer Universitya university or a new campus to obtain state authorization or accreditation, would render Strayer Universitythe university ineligible to participate in Title IV programs, at least in that state or at that location. Department of Education regulations require institutions to report to the Department of Education a new additional location at which at least 50% of an eligible program will be offered, if the institution wants to disburse Title IV program funds to students enrolled at that location. Under its Program Participation Agreement with the Department of Education, Strayer University must notify the Department of Education of the addition of any such location within ten days of opening, but need not seek prior approval. Under Capella University’s provisional certification, the Department of Education must approve any new campus locations, level of academic offerings, and non-degree and degree programs before Capella University may award or disburse Title IV aid to students enrolled at any such location or in any such program. Institutions are responsible for knowing whether they need approval, and institutions that add locations and disburse Title IV program funds without having obtained any necessary approval may be subject to administrative repayments and other sanctions.

36


Table of Contents

 

The gainful employment regulation that became effective July 1, 2015, provides that an institution may establish a new program’s Title IV eligibility by updating the list of the institution’s programs maintained by the Department of Education and thereby making the certification required by the regulation, as described above under Gainful“Gainful Employment. However, an institution may not update its list of eligible programs to include a failing or zone program that the institution voluntarily discontinued or became ineligible, or a gainful employment program that is substantially similar to such a program, until three years after the loss of eligibility or discontinuance.

 

27


Table of Contents

Credit Hours

 

The Higher Education Act and regulations use the term “credit hour” to define an eligible program and an academic year and to determine enrollment status and the amount of Title IV program funds an institution may disburse during a payment period. The regulations define the term “credit hour” and require accrediting agencies to review the reliability and accuracy of an institution’s credit hour assignments. If an accreditor does not comply with this requirement, its recognition by the Department of Education could be jeopardized. If an accreditor identifies systematic or significant noncompliance in one or more of an institution’s programs, the accreditor must notify the Secretary of Education. If the Department of Education determines that an institution is out of compliance with the credit hour definition, the Department of Education could impose liabilities or other sanctions. We believe that both Strayer University and Capella University are in compliance with the credit hour rules. 

 

Other Regulations Governing Title IV Programs

 

The Department of Education has enacted a comprehensive set of regulations governing an institution’s participation in Title IV programs. If either Strayer University or Capella University were not to continue to comply with these regulations, such noncompliance might affect the operations of the University and its ability to participate in Title IV programs.

 

The Clery Act and Title IX

 

Strayer Universityand Capella Universities must comply with the campus safety and security reporting requirements as well as other requirements in the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (the “Clery Act”). In addition, the Department has interpreted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”) to categorize sexual violence as a form of prohibited sex discrimination and to require institutions to follow certain disciplinary procedures with respect to such offenses. Failure by Strayer Universitythe Universities to comply with the Clery Act or Title IX requirements or regulations thereunder could result in action by the Department fining Strayer University,the Universities, or limiting or suspending its participatingtheir participation in Title IV programs, could lead to litigation, and could harm Strayer University’s reputation.the Universities’ reputations. We believe that Strayer University isthe Universities are in compliance with these requirements. On November 29, 2018, the Department of Education published proposed rules related to implementation of Title IX, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs that receive funding from the federal government. The proposed rules would define what constitutes sexual harassment for purposes of Title IX in the administrative enforcement context, would describe what actions trigger an institution’s obligation to respond to incidents of alleged sexual harassment, and would specify how an institution must respond to allegations of sexual harassment. The Department of Education accepted public comments through January 30, 2019. We cannot predict what final regulations will be adopted as a result of this rulemaking process.

 

Compliance Reviews

 

Strayer University isand Capella University are subject to announced and unannounced compliance reviews and audits by various external agencies, including the Department of Education, its Office of Inspector General, state licensing agencies, guaranty agencies, and accrediting agencies. The Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations also require an institution to submit annually to the Secretary of Education a compliance audit of its administration of Title IV programs conducted by an independent certified public accountant in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards and applicable audit guides of the Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General (“ED OIG”). For fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2016, Strayer Universitythe Universities must submit

37


Table of Contents

such audits that have been conducted in accordance with a revised guide for audits of proprietary schools that was issued by the ED OIG in September 2016. In addition, to enable the Secretary of Education to make a determination of financial responsibility, an institution must submit annually to the Secretary of Education audited financial statements prepared in accordance with Department of Education regulations. For both Universities, financial responsibility is determined at the SEI parent level. 

 

In 2014, the Department of Education conducted four campus-based program reviews of Strayer University locations in three states and the District of Columbia. The reviews covered federal financial aid years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, and two of the reviews also covered compliance with the Clery Act, the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act, and regulations related thereto. For three of the program reviews, we received correspondence from the Department closing the program reviews with no further action required by us. For the other program review, the University received a Final Program Review Determination Letter closing the review and identifying a payment of less than $500 due to the Department of Education based on an underpayment on a return to Title IV calculation. TheStrayer University remitted payment and received a letter from the Department indicating that no further action was required and that the matter was closed.

 

Capella University has not had a program review in the last several years.

28


 

Table of Contents

Potential Effect of Regulatory Violations

 

If either Strayer University or Capella University fails to comply with the regulatory standards governing Title IV programs, the Department of Education could impose one or more sanctions, including transferring Strayerthe University from the advance payment method to the reimbursement or cash monitoring system of payment, seeking to require repayment of certain Title IV funds, requiring the University to post a letter of credit in favor of the Department of Education as a condition for continued Title IV certification, taking emergency action against the University, or referring the matter for criminal prosecution or initiating proceedings to impose a fine or to limit, condition, suspend, or terminate Strayerthe University’s participation in Title IV programs. Although there are no such sanctions currently in force, if such sanctions or proceedings were imposed against Strayer University or Capella University and resulted in a substantial curtailment, or termination, of thethat University’s participation in Title IV programs or resulted in substantial fines or monetary liabilities, Strayerthe University wouldand the Company could be materially and adversely affected.

 

If Strayer University or Capella University lost its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, or if Congress reduced the amount of available federal student financial aid, the University would seek to arrange or provide alternative sources of revenue or financial aid for students. Although the University believesUniversities believe that one or more private organizations would be willing to provide financial assistance to students attending Strayer University,the Universities, there is no assurance that this would be the case, and the interest rate and other terms of such student financial aid are unlikely to be as favorable as those for Title IV program funds. Strayer University mightThe Universities may be required to guarantee all or part of such alternative assistance in a manner that complies with rules governing schools’ relationships with lenders or might incur other additional costs in connection with securing alternative sources of financial aid. Accordingly, the loss of eligibility of Strayer University or Capella University to participate in Title IV programs, or a reduction in the amount of available federal student financial aid, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on Strayer University or Capella University, even if it could arrange or provide alternative sources of revenue or student financial aid.

 

In addition to the actions that may be brought against us as a result of our participation in Title IV programs, we also may be subject, from time to time, to complaints and lawsuits relating to regulatory compliance brought not only by our regulatory agencies, but also by other government agencies and third parties.

 

Acquisitions of Other Institutions

When a company, partnership or any other entity or individual acquires an institution that is eligible to participate in Title IV programs, that institution undergoes a change of ownership resulting in a change of control as defined by the Department of Education. Upon such a change of control, an institution's eligibility to participate in Title IV programs is generally suspended until it has applied for recertification by the Department of Education as an eligible institution under its new ownership, which requires that the institution also re-establish its state authorization and accreditation. The

38


Table of Contents

Department of Education may temporarily and provisionally certify an institution seeking approval of a change of ownership under certain circumstances while the Department of Education reviews the institution’s application. The time required for the Department of Education to act on such an application may vary substantially. The Department of Education’s recertification of an institution following a change of control will be on a provisional basis.

Change in Ownership Resulting in a Change of Control

 

Many states and accrediting agencies require institutions of higher education to report or obtain approval of certain changes in ownership or other aspects of institutional status, but the types of and triggers for such reporting or approval vary among states and accrediting agencies. Both Strayer University’s accrediting agency, Middle States, requiresand Capella University’s accrediting agency, the Higher Learning Commission, require institutions that it accreditsthey accredit to inform itthem in advance of any substantive change, including a change that significantly alters the ownership or control of the institution. Examples of substantive changes requiring advance notice to, and approval by, Middle Statesthe agency include changes in the legal status, ownership, or form of control of the institution, such as the sale of a proprietary institution. Middle StatesBoth agencies must approve a substantive change in advance in order to include the change in the institution’s accreditation status. Additionally, both Middle States and the Higher Learning Commission will undertake a site visit to an institution that has undergone a change in ownership or control no later than six months after the change.

 

Federal agencies also regulate changes in ownership and control. The Higher Education Act provides that an institution that undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change of control loses its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs and must apply to the Department of Education in order to reestablish such eligibility. An institution is ineligible to receive Title IV program funds during the period from the change of ownership and control until recertification. The Higher Education Act provides that the Department of Education may temporarily, provisionally certify an institution seeking approval of a change of ownership and control based on preliminary review by the Department of Education of a materially complete application received by the Department of Education within ten business days after the transaction. The Department of Education may continue such temporary, provisional certification on a month-to-month basis until it has rendered a final decision on the institution’s application. If the Department of Education approves the application after a change in ownership and control, it issues a provisional certification, which extends for a period expiring not later than the end of the third complete award year following the date of provisional certification. The Higher Education Act defines one of the events that would trigger a change in ownership resulting in a change of control as the transfer of the controlling interest of the stock of the institution or its parent corporation. For a

29


Table of Contents

publicly traded corporation such as StrayerStrategic Education, Inc., the Department of Education regulations define a change of control as occurring when a person or entity acquires ownership and control of a corporation, such that the corporation is required to file a Form 8-K with the SEC publicly disclosing the change of control. The regulations also provide that a change in ownership and control of a publicly traded corporation occurs if a person or entity who is a controlling stockholder of the corporation ceases to be a controlling stockholder. A controlling stockholder is a stockholder who holds, or controls through agreement, at least 25% of the total outstanding voting stock of the corporation and more shares of voting stock than any other stockholder.

 

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, working with the U.S. Department of State, has implemented a mandatory electronic reporting system for schools that enroll foreign students and exchange visitors. Strayer University currently is authorized by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to admit foreign students for study in the United States subject to applicable requirements. In certain circumstances, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security may require an institution to obtain approval for a change in ownership and control.

 

Pursuant to federal law providing benefits for veterans and reservists, some of the programs offered by Strayer University and Capella University are approved by state approving agencies for the enrollment of persons eligible to receive U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs educational benefits. In 2017, we2018, Strayer University had such approval in Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Washington, D.C. In 2018, Capella University had such approval in Minnesota, and because all of its programs are online only, this allows it to extend VA education benefits to students in all states and abroad. In certain circumstances, state approving agencies may require an institution to obtain approval for a change in ownership and control.

 

39


Table of Contents

If Strayer University or Capella University underwent a change of control that required approval by any state authority, Middle States,accrediting agency, or any federal agency, and such approval were significantly delayed, limited, or denied, there could be a material adverse effect on Strayerthe University’s ability to offer certain educational programs, award certain degrees, diplomas, or certificates, operate one or more of its locations, admit certain students, or participate in Title IV programs, which in turn, could materially and adversely affect Strayerthe University’s operations. A change that required approval by a state regulatory authority, Middle States,an accrediting agency, or a federal agency could also delay Strayerthe University’s ability to establish new campuses or educational programs and may have other adverse regulatory effects. Furthermore, the suspension from Title IV programs and the necessity of obtaining regulatory approvals in connection with a change of control could materially limit Strayerthe University’s flexibility in future financing or acquisition transactions.

 

Legislative and Regulatory Activity

 

Congress, from time to time, considers legislation that would make changes in the Higher Education Act and other education-related federal laws. The Department of Education and other federal agencies similarly consider new regulations and regulatory amendments. State legislatures and agencies and accreditors likewise periodically change their laws, regulations, and standards. Such activity may adversely affect enrollment in for-profit educational institutions. Although legislative and regulatory activity in recent years has had a negative impact on the for-profit post-secondary education industry as a whole, we cannot predict the impact of recent, pending, or possible future legislative or regulatory changes, if any, on our long-term business model.

 

Congress

 

Congress historically has reauthorized the Higher Education Act (“HEA”), which is the law governing Title IV programs, approximately every five to six years. In 2008, Congress reauthorized the HEA through the end of 2013. Congress has held hearings regarding the reauthorization of the HEA and continued to consider new legislation regarding the passage thereof. Despite inaction on reauthorization ofIt is currently unclear when Congress will reauthorize the Higher Education Act. The most recent reauthorized Higher Education Act Congress extended funding forcontinued all of the Title IV through September 30, 2018, throughprograms in which we participate, but made many revisions to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017.requirements governing the Title IV programs, including provisions relating to the relationships between institutions and lenders that make student loans, student loan default rates, and the formula for revenue that institutions are permitted to derive from the Title IV programs. In December 2017,addition, further rulemaking by the Department of Education may impose additional requirements on institutions that participate in Title IV programs. Committee leadership of both the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Educationand Senate began reauthorization hearings in the latter half of 2013, and the Workforce considered and passed outcurrent Congress has continued to discuss reauthorization of committee the Promoting Real Opportunity, Success, and Prosperity through Education Reform Act, or PROSPER Act, to reauthorize the HEA. In its current form, the PROSPER Act would make dramatic changes to the HEA by, among other things, eliminating the 90/10 Rule, eliminating regulation of gainful employmentExisting programs and replacing current accountability metrics linkedparticipation requirements are subject to cohort default rates with metrics linked to timely loan repayment. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions has begun to hold hearings onchange in this process. Additionally, funding for the HEA reauthorization,student financial assistance programs may be affected during appropriations and the Chairman has

30


Table of Contents

issued a white paper including a number of policy proposals for consideration. We cannot predict what the final reauthorization will or will not do, or when or how it will be enacted, or its effects on Strayer University.

Congress continues to show interest in regulation and oversight of institutions of higher education, especially proprietary institutions. For example, on February 13, 2017, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) introduced the legislation that would amend the HEA to modify required consumer information disclosures related to completion graduation rates by expanding such disclosure requirements to include information about additional categories of students. On March 20, 2017, Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY) introduced legislation that would amend loan counseling requirements under the HEA. On April 7, 2017, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) introduced legislation that would add mandatory disclosure requirements to an institution’s financial aid offer form and require use of a standardized form. We cannot predict whether these or similar bills, and others affecting our business, will be introduced or will pass or what, if any, impact they would have on our business.budget actions.

 

Appropriations

 

Congress reviews and determines appropriations for Title IV programs on an annual basis. Congress has appropriated funds for the Department of Education through September 30, 2019. From December 22, 2018 to January 25, 2019, Congress and the President reached an impasse over funding for certain other government agencies for federal fiscal year 2019. The so-called “partial government shutdown” affected the Department of Education and Title IV programs to the extent that the Department of Education or students rely on information from affected federal agencies, such as the Internal Revenue Service. The Department of Education has issued guidance to endeavor to reduce adverse consequences for students. A future government shutdown, particularly one that includes the Department of Education or appropriations for Title IV programs, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

An elimination of certain Title IV programs, a reduction in federal funding levels of such programs, material changes in the requirements for participation in such programs, or the substitution of materially different programs could reduce the ability of certain students to finance their education. This,Such reductions, in turn, could lead to lower enrollments at Strayer University or Capella University or require us to increase our reliance upon alternative sources of student financial aid. Given the significant percentage of our revenues that are derived indirectly from Title IV programs, the loss of, or a significant reduction in, Title IV program funds available to our students could have a material adverse effect on Strayer University.University, Capella University, and the Company.

 

40


Table of Contents

Beginning July 1, 2017, in accordance with the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017, institutions that participate in the Title IV programs may award Pell Grant funds for up to 150% of a student’s standard scheduled Pell Grant in one award year. This provision, which commonly is referred to as “year-round Pell,” is intended to allow students to graduate more quickly and with less debt. To be eligible for the additional Pell Grant funds, a student must be otherwise eligible to receive Pell Grant funds and must be enrolled at least half-time in the payment period for which the student receives additional Pell Grant funds in excess of 100% of the student’s standard scheduled award.

 

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) has pursued enforcement actions against certain proprietary institutions of higher education and has released several reports that directly address issues related to institutions of higher education. In October 2017, the CFPB Student Loan Ombudsman released its annual report analyzing more than 7,700 complaints the CFPB received from private student loan borrowers between September 1, 2016 and August 31, 2017 and more than 2,300 federal student loan financing complaints the CFPB received from federal student loan borrowers. We do not know what steps the CFPB or Congress may take in response to these actions and whether such actions, if any, will have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

 

U.S. Department of Education

 

Title IV regulations applicable to Strayer Universitythe Universities have been subject to frequent revisions, many of which have increased the level of scrutiny to which higher education institutions are subjected and have raised applicable standards. In addition to those regulations discussed above, on October 30, 2015, the Department of Education also published final regulations creating a new income-contingent repayment plan and implementing changes to streamline and enhance existing processes for borrowers. The regulations were effective July 1, 2016.

 

Current Federal Rulemaking

On February 8, 2016,July 31, 2018, the Department of Education announced its intention to establish a negotiated rulemaking committee to prepare proposed regulations for the creation ofTitle IV programs. As described in the July 31 announcement and further detailed in a Student Aid Enforcement Unit to enablesubsequent announcement on October 15, the Department to respond more quickly and efficiently to allegations of illegal actions by higher education institutions. The Enforcement Unit consists of four divisions, including an Investigations Group, a Borrower Defense Group, an Administrative Actions and Appeals Service Group, and a Clery Group. The Enforcement Unit is designed to enableindicated the Department to support more reviews of high-risk institutions, respond to concerns raised by states’ and other federal agencies’ investigations, and respond to complaints and claimsproposed topics for loan forgiveness by students. In August 2017,negotiation include:

Requirements for accrediting agencies in their oversight of member institutions and programs.

Criteria used by the Secretary to recognize accrediting agencies, emphasizing criteria that focus on educational quality and deemphasizing those that are anti-competitive.

Simplification of the Department’s recognition and review of accrediting agencies.

Clarification of the core oversight responsibilities of each entity in the regulatory triad, including accrediting agencies, states, and the Department, to hold institutions accountable.

Clarification of the permissible arrangements between an institution of higher education and another organization to provide a portion of an education program (34 CFR 668.5).

The roles and responsibilities of institutions and accrediting agencies in the teach-out process (34 CFR 600.32(d) and 602.24).

Elimination of regulations related to programs that have not been funded in many years.

Needed technical changes and corrections to program regulations that have been identified by the Department.

3141


 

Table of Contents

Regulatory changes required to ensure equitable treatment of brick-and-mortar and distance education programs; enable expansion of direct assessment programs, distance education, and competency-based education; and clarify disclosure and other requirements of state authorization.

Protections to require that accreditors recognize and respect institutional mission, and evaluate an institution’s policies and educational programs based on that mission; and to remove barriers to the eligibility of faith-based entities to participate in the Title IV programs.

Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education (“TEACH”) Grant requirements and ways to reduce and correct the inadvertent conversion of grants to loans. 

The Department also announced its intention to convene three subcommittees: one addressing proposed regulations related to distance learning and educational innovation, one addressing TEACH Grant conversions, and one to make recommendations to the committee regarding revisions to the regulations regarding the eligibility of faith-based entities to participate in the Title IV programs. The distance learning and educational innovation subcommittee will address, among other topics, simplification of state authorization requirements, the definition of “regular and substantive interaction,” the definition of the term “credit hour,” direct assessment programs and competency-based education, and barriers to innovation in post-secondary education.

In connection with this negotiated rulemaking process, the Department convened three public hearings and accepted written comments through September 14, 2018. Negotiations began in January 2019 and are anticipated to run through April 2019. The Department intends to publish rules to be effective July 2020.

On November 29, 2018, the Department of Education announcedpublished proposed rules related to implementation of Title IX, which would define what constitutes sexual harassment for purposes of Title IX in the administrative enforcement context, would describe what actions trigger an institution’s obligation to respond to incidents of alleged sexual harassment, and would specify how an institution must respond to allegations of sexual harassment. The Department of Education accepted public comments through January 30, 2019. We cannot predict what final regulations will be adopted as a new leaderresult of the Enforcement Unit, who will report to the head of the Department’s Compliance Unit.this rulemaking process.

 

College Affordability and Transparency Lists

 

The Department of Education publishes on its website lists of the top 5% of institutions, in each of nine categories, with (1) the highest tuition and fees for the most recent academic year, (2) the highest “net price” for the most recent academic year, (3) the largest percentage increase in tuition and fees for the most recent three academic years, and (4) the largest percentage increase in net price for the most recent three academic years. An institution that is placed on a list for high percentage increases in either tuition and fees or in net price must submit a report to the Department of Education explaining the increases and the steps that it intends to take to reduce costs. The Department of Education will report annually to Congress on these institutions and will publish their reports on its website. The Department of Education also posts lists of the top 10% of institutions in each of the nine categories with lowest tuition and fees or the lowest net price for the most recent academic year. Under HEOA,the Higher Education Act, net price means average yearly price actually charged to first-time, full-time undergraduate students who receive student aid at a higher education institution after such aid is deducted.

 

College Scorecard

 

On December 19, 2014, the Department of Education issued a framework for a college ratings system, which was to include predominantly four-year and two-year institutions. On June 25, 2015, the Department of Education stated that in lieu of the previously announced college ratings system, it would instead create a consumer-driven website that will allow users to compare colleges based on measures that may be of importance to them. In September 2015, the Department of Education publicly released its “College Scorecard” website. Among other characteristics, the College Scorecard allows users to search for schools based upon programs offered, location, size, tax status, mission, and religious affiliation. In October 2017, the Department of Education announced that its Integrated PostsecondaryPost-secondary Education Data System, or IPEDS, would publish for the first time completion data for part-time and non-first-time students, which will provide additional information about institutions’ performance. The Department of Education updates the data available on the College Scorecard on a periodic basis.

 

42


Table of Contents

Executive Order on Military and Veterans Benefits Programs

 

In April 2012, President Obama issued an Executive Order directing the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, along with other Executive Branch agencies, to implement actions to establish “Principles of Excellence” to apply to educational institutions receiving funding from federal military and veterans educational benefits programs, including benefits programs provided by the Post-9/11 GI Bill and the military tuition assistance program. The Principles of Excellence relate broadly to information regarding tuition and fees, academic quality, marketing, and state authorization requirements. The Principles of Excellence require federal agencies to create a centralized complaint system for students receiving federal military and veterans educational benefits to register complaints that relevant agencies can track and address. On January 30, 2014, the Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Education, and Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in collaboration with the CFPB and the U.S. Department of Justice, announced a new online student complaint system for service members, veterans, and their families to report negative experiences at education institutions and training programs administering the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Department of Defense tuition assistance programs, and other military-related education benefit programs.

 

Additional Information

 

We maintain a website at www.strayereducation.com.www.strategiceducation.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only. We make available on our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

 

The Form 10-K and other reports filed with the SEC can be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be

32


Table of Contents

obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC; the website address is www.sec.gov.

 

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

 

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in the documents incorporated by reference herein before making an investment decision. The occurrence of any of the following risks could materially harm our business, adversely affect the market price of our common stock and could cause you to suffer a partial or complete loss of your investment. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also materially harm our business and operations. See “Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

Risks Related to Extensive Regulation of Our Business

 

If wethe Universities fail to comply with the extensive legal and regulatory requirements for our business, wehigher education institutions, they could face significant monetary or other liabilities fines and penalties, including loss of access to federal student loans and grants for ourtheir students.

 

As a providerproviders of higher education, wethe Universities are subject to extensive laws and regulation on both the federal and state levels.levels and by accrediting agencies. In particular, the Higher Education Act and related regulations subject Strayer University, Capella University, and all other higher education institutions that participate in the various Title IV programs to significant regulatory scrutiny.

 

The Higher Education Act mandates specific regulatory responsibilities for each of the following components of the higher education regulatory triad: (1) the federal government through the Department of Education; (2) the accrediting agencies recognized by the Secretary of Education; and (3) state education regulatory bodies.

In addition, other federal agencies such as the Consumer Financial Protection BureauCFPB, Federal Trade Commission, and Federal TradeCommunications Commission and various state agencies and state attorneys general enforce consumer protection, calling and texting, marketing, privacy and data security, and other laws applicable to post-secondary educational institutions. Findings of

43


Table of Contents

noncompliance could result in monetary damages, fines, penalties, injunctions, or restrictions or obligations that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Some of these laws also include private rights of action.

 

The laws, regulations, standards, and policies of these regulatory agenciesapplicable to our business frequently change, and changes in, or new interpretations of, applicable laws, regulations, standards, or policies could have a material adverse effect on our accreditation, authorization to operate in various states, permissible activities, ability to communicate with prospective students, receipt of funds under Title IV programs, or costs of doing business.

 

Title IV requirements are enforced by the Department of Education and, in some instances, by private plaintiffs. If wethe Universities are found not to be in compliance with these laws, regulations, standards, or policies, wethey could lose our access to Title IV program funds, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. Findings of noncompliance also could result in our being required to pay monetary damages, or being subjected to fines, penalties, injunctions, restrictions on our access to Title IV program funds, or other censure that could have a material adverse effect on our business.the Company. 

 

OurThe Universities’ failure to comply with the Department of Education’s gainful employment regulations could result in heightened disclosure requirements and loss of Title IV eligibility.eligibility for noncompliant programs.

 

To be eligible for Title IV funding, academic programs offered by proprietary institutions of higher education must prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation. On October 31, 2014, the Department of Education published the final regulations on gainful employment, which, with the exception of certain disclosure requirements, generally became effective July 1, 2015. The regulations include two debt-to-earnings measures, consisting of an annual income rate and a discretionary income rate. The annual income rate measures student debt in relation to earnings, and the discretionary income rate measures student debt in relation to discretionary income. A program passes if the program’s graduates:

33


Table of Contents

·

Have an annual income rate that does not exceed 8%; or

 

·

Have a discretionary income rate that does not exceed 20%.

 

A program that does not pass either of the debt-to-earnings metrics, and that has an annual income rate between 8% and 12%, or a discretionary income rate between 20% and 30%, is considered to be in a warning zone. A program fails if the program’s graduates have an annual income rate of 12% or greater and a discretionary income rate of 30% or greater. A program would become Title IV-ineligible for three years if it failed both metrics for two out of three consecutive years or fails to pass at least one metric for four consecutive award years. The regulations provide a means by which an institution may challenge the Department of Education’s calculation of any of the debt metrics prior to loss of its Title IV eligibility.

 

The requirements associated with the gainful employment regulations may substantially increase our administrative burdens and could affect our program offerings, student enrollment, persistence, and retention. Further, although the regulations provide opportunities for an institution to correct any potential deficiencies in a program prior to the loss of Title IV eligibility, the continuing eligibility of our academic programs will be affected by factors beyond management’s control, such as changes in our graduates’ employment and income levels, changes in student borrowing levels, increases in interest rates, and various other factors. Even if we were able to correct any deficiency in the gainful employment metrics in a timely manner, the disclosure requirements associated with a program’s failure to meet at least one metric may adversely affect student enrollments in that program and may adversely affect the reputation of our institution.

 

On June 16, 2017, the Department of Education announced that it would convene a negotiated rulemaking committee to develop proposed regulations to revise the gainful employment regulations. The negotiated rulemaking committee held meetingsconvened in December 2017 and Februaryearly 2018. On August 14, 2018, the Department published a notice of proposed rulemaking, which proposed rescinding the gainful employment regulations and updating the College Scorecard or a similar web-based tool to provide program-level outcomes for all higher education programs at all institutions that participate in the Title IV programs. Public comments were accepted through September 13, 2018, and the Department has indicated it is scheduled to meet again in March 2018.currently drafting final rules. We cannot predict what regulations will be proposed or ultimately adopted.

 

44


Table of Contents

Congressional examination of for-profit post-secondary education could lead to legislation or other governmental action that may negatively affect the industry.

 

Since 2010, Congress has increased its focus on for-profit higher education institutions, including regarding participation in Title IV programs and oversight by the Department of Defense of tuition assistance and by the Department of Veterans AdministrationAffairs (“VA”) of veterans education benefits for military service members and veterans, respectively, attending for-profit colleges. The Senate HELP Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions and other congressional committees have held hearings into, among other things, the proprietary education sector and its participation in Title IV programs, the standards and procedures of accrediting agencies, credit hours and program length, the portion of federal student financial aid going to proprietary institutions, and the receipt of veteransmilitary tuition assistance and militaryveterans education benefits by students enrolled at proprietary institutions. Strayer University hasand Capella University have cooperated with these inquiries. A number of legislators have variously requested the Government Accountability Office to review and make recommendations regarding, among other things, recruitment practices, educational quality, student outcomes, the sufficiency of integrity safeguards against waste, fraud, and abuse in Title IV programs, and the percentage of proprietary institutions’ revenue coming from Title IV and other federal funding sources.

 

This activity may result in legislation, further rulemaking affecting participation in Title IV programs, and other governmental actions. In addition, concerns generated by congressional activity may adversely affect enrollment in, and revenues of, for-profit educational institutions. Limitations on the amount of federal student financial aid for which our students are eligible under Title IV could materially and adversely affect our business.

 

We are dependent on the renewal and maintenance of Title IV programs.

 

The Higher Education Act which is the law authorizing Title IV programs, is subject to periodic reauthorization. Congress completed the most recent reauthorization through multiple pieces of legislation and may reauthorize the HEA in a piecemeal manner in the future. Additionally, Congress determines the funding level for each Title IV program on an annual basis. Any action by Congress that significantly reduces funding for Title IV programs or the ability of our schoolthe Universities or their or students to participate in these programs could materially harm our business. A reduction in government

34


Table of Contents

funding levels could lead to lower enrollments at our school and require us to arrange for alternative sources of financial aid for our students. Lower student enrollments or our inability to arrange such alternative sources of funding could adversely affect our business.

 

WeIn addition, the Universities’ ability to conduct their business, including obtaining necessary approvals from the Department of Education, may be affected by staffing levels at the Department and the volume of applications and other requests to the Department. If the Department lacks adequate personnel or the Department’s workload exceeds its capacity, action by the Department on requests by the Universities could be significantly delayed, and such delays could have a material adverse effect on the Universities and our business.

The Universities are subject to compliance reviews, which, if they resulted in a material finding of noncompliance, could affect ourtheir ability to participate in Title IV programs.

 

Because wethe Universities operate in a highly regulated industry, wethey are subject to compliance reviews and claims of noncompliance and related lawsuits by government agencies, accrediting agencies, and third parties, including claims brought by third parties on behalf of the federal government. For example, the Department of Education regularly conducts program reviews of educational institutions that are participating in Title IV programs, and the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Education regularly conducts audits and investigations of such institutions. The Department of Education could limit, suspend, or terminate our participation in Title IV programs or impose other penalties such as requiring usthe Universities to make refunds, pay liabilities, or pay an administrative fine upon a material finding of noncompliance.

 

In 2014, the Department of Education conducted four campus-based program reviews of Strayer University locations in three states and the District of Columbia. The reviews covered federal financial aid years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, and two of the reviews also covered compliance with the Clery Act, the Drug-Free Schools and

45


Table of Contents

Communities Act, and regulations related thereto. For three of the program reviews, we received correspondence from the Department of Education closing the program reviews with no further action required by us. For the other program review, the University received a Final Program Review Determination Letter closing the review and identifying a payment of less than $500 due to the Department of Education based on an underpayment on a return to Title IV calculation. The University remitted payment, and received a letter from the Department on May 26, 2015, indicating that no further action was required and that the matter was closed. Future compliance reviews may not yield similar results and may have a materially negative affect on the Company. Capella University has not undergone a program review in several years. 

 

On October 11, 2017, the Department and Strayer University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Strayer University’s continued participation in Title IV programs with full certification through June 30, 2021. On January 18, 2019, consistent with standard procedure upon a Title IV institution’s change of ownership, the Department and Capella University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Capella University’s continued participation in Title IV programs with provisional certification through December 31, 2022.

 

If we faileither of the Universities fails to maintain ourits institutional accreditation or if ourits institutional accrediting body loses recognition by the Department of Education, wethe University would lose ourits ability to participate in Title IV programs.

 

The loss of Strayer University’s accreditation by Middle States or Middle States’ loss of recognition by the Department of Education would render Strayer University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs and would have a material adverse effect on our business. Similarly, the loss of Capella University’s accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission or the Higher Learning Commission’s loss of recognition by the Department of Education would render Capella University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs and would have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, an adverse action by Middle Statesor the Higher Learning Commission other than loss of accreditation, such as issuance of a warning, could have a material adverse effect on our business. In November 2015,October 2018, the Department of Education announced that it would establish a setnegotiated rulemaking committee to prepare proposed regulations related to, among other topics, the Department’s recognition of executive actionsaccrediting agencies and legislative proposals to increase transparency and rigorrelated institutional eligibility issues. The negotiated rulemaking committee convened in accreditation. On January 20, 2016,2019 for the first of several scheduled meetings. We cannot predict what related regulations the Department of Education issued additional recommendations related to accreditation.will propose or ultimately adopt.  

 

The Higher Education Act charges the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (“NACIQI”) with recommending to the Secretary of Education which accrediting or state approval agencies should be recognized as reliable authorities for judging the quality of post-secondary institutions and programs. In June 2017, NACIQI renewed its recognition of Middle States for six months and required Middle States to demonstrate compliance with certain requirements. NACIQI reviewed Middle States at its February 2018 meeting and extendedrecommended that the Secretary of Education extend its recognition for five years. NACIQI also reviewed the Higher Learning Commission at its February 2018 meeting and recommended that the Secretary of Education extend its recognition for five years. On September 22, 2016, the Department of Education rescinded its recognition of the Accreditation Council of Independent Colleges and Schools. Increased scrutiny of accreditors by the Secretary of Education in connection with the Department of Education’s recognition process may result in increased scrutiny of institutions by accreditors or have other adverse consequences.

 

35


If Tableeither of Contents

If we failthe Universities fails to maintain any of ourits state authorizations, wethe University would lose ourits ability to operate in that state and to participate in Title IV programs there.

 

Each Strayer University campus is authorized to operate and to grant degrees, diplomas, or certificates by the applicable education agency or agencies of the state where the campus is located. Such state authorization is required for students at the campus to participate in Title IV programs. The loss of state authorization would, among other things, limit Strayer University’s ability to operate in that state, render Strayer University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs at least at those state campus locations, and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Capella University is registered as a private institution with the Minnesota Office of Higher Education (“MOHE”), as required for most post-secondary private institutions that grant degrees at the associate level or above in Minnesota

46


Table of Contents

and as required by the Higher Education Act to participate in Title IV programs. The loss of state authorization would, among other things, limit StrayerCapella University’s ability to operate in that state, render Capella University ineligible to participate in Title IV programs, and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Effective July 1, 2011, Department of Education regulations provide that an institution is considered legally authorized by a state if the state has a process to review and appropriately act on complaints concerning the institution, including enforcing applicable state laws, and the institution complies with any applicable state approval or licensure requirements consistent with the new rules. If a state in which Strayer has a physical campus University or Capella University is located fails to comply in the future with the provisions of the new rule or fails to provide the University with legal authorization, it could limit Strayerthe University’s ability to operate in that state and to participate in Title IV programs at least for students in that state and could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

 

On December 19, 2016, the Department of Education published final regulations addressing, among other issues, state authorization of programs offered through distance education. The final regulations, which are effective July 1, 2018, require an institution offering distance education programs to be authorized by each state in which the institution enrolls students, if such authorization is required by the state, in order to award Title IV aid to such students. An institution could obtain such authorization directly from the state or through a state authorization reciprocity agreement. On January 30, 2017, the Department of Education announced that it intends to take unspecified regulatory actions regarding certain regulations that have been published but have not yet taken effect, including regulations related to state authorization of distance education. As of February 2018, the Department had taken no action with respect to the state authorization of distance education regulations. If one of our institutions fails to obtain or maintain required state authorization to provide post-secondary distance education in a specific state, the institution could lose its ability to award Title IV aid to online students in that state and could lose its ability to provide distance education in that state.

Strayer University participatesand Capella University participate in the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (“SARA”), which allows the UniversityUniversities to enroll students in distance education programs in each SARA member state. Strayer UniversityEach of the Universities applies separately to non-SARA member states(i.e., California) for authorization to enroll students, if such authorization is required by the state. If Strayer University or Capella University failed to comply with the requirements to participate in SARA or state licensing or authorization requirements to provide distance education in a non-SARA state, the University could lose its ability to participate in SARA or may be subject to the loss of state licensure or authorization to provide distance education in that non-SARA state, respectively.

 

On December 19, 2016, the Department of Education published final regulations addressing, among other issues, state authorization of programs offered through distance education. The final regulations, which were scheduled to be effective July 1, 2018, require an institution offering distance education programs to be authorized by each state in which the institution enrolls students (other than the state(s) in which the institution is physically located), if such authorization is required by the state, in order to award Title IV aid to such students. An institution could obtain such authorization directly from the state or (except in California) through a state authorization reciprocity agreement. Under those rules, if one of the Universities should fail to obtain or maintain required state authorization to provide post-secondary distance education in a specific state in which the institution is not physically located, the institution could lose its ability to provide distance education in that state and to award Title IV aid to online students in that state.

If we faileither of the Universities fails to obtain recertification by the Department of Education when required, wethe Universities would lose ourtheir ability to participate in Title IV programs.

 

An institution generally must seek recertification from the Department of Education at least every six years and possibly more frequently depending on various factors, such as whether it is provisionally certified. The Department of Education may also review an institution’s continued eligibility and certification to participate in Title IV programs, or scope of eligibility and certification, in the event the institution undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change of control or expands its activities in certain ways, such as the addition of certain types of new programs, or, in certain cases, changes to the academic credentials that it offers. In certain circumstances, the Department of Education must provisionally certify an institution. The Department of Education may withdraw oureither University’s certification if itthe Department determines that we arethe University is not fulfilling material requirements for continued participation in Title IV programs. If the Department of Education does not renew, or withdraws oureither University’s certification to participate in Title IV programs, ourits students would no longer be able to receive Title IV program funds, whichfunds. Such a loss would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Each institution participating in Title IV programs must enter into a Program Participation Agreement with the Department of Education. Under the agreement, the institution agrees to follow the Department of Education’s rules and regulations governing Title IV programs. On October 11, 2017, the Department and Strayer University executed a new

36


Table of Contents

Program Participation Agreement, approving Strayer University’s continued participation in Title IV programs with full certification through June 30, 2021. On January 18, 2019, consistent with standard procedure upon a Title IV institution’s change of ownership, the Department and Capella University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Capella University’s continued participation in Title IV programs with provisional certification through December 31, 2022.

 

47


Table of Contents

A failure to demonstrate financial responsibility or administrative capability may result in the loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs.

 

To be eligible to participate in Title IV programs, Strayer University and Capella University must comply with specific standards and procedures set forth in the Higher Education Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the Department of Education, including, among other things, certain standards of financial responsibility and administrative capability. If we failone of the Universities fails to demonstrate financial responsibility or maintain administrative capability under the Department of Education’s regulations, wethe University could lose ourits eligibility to participate in Title IV programs or have that eligibility adversely conditioned, which wouldconditioned. Such developments could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Student loan defaults could result in the loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs.

 

In general, under the Higher Education Act, an educational institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV programs if, for three consecutive federal fiscal years, 30% or more of its students who were required to begin repaying their student loans in the relevant federal fiscal year default on their payment by the end of the second federal fiscal year following that fiscal year. Institutions with a cohort default rate equal to or greater than 15% for any of the three most recent fiscal years for which data are available are subject to a 30-day delayed disbursement period for first-year, first-time borrowers. While its cohort default rate for 20142015 was 13.2%10.6%, Strayer University voluntarily delays disbursement of Direct Loans in this manner. In addition, an institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV programs if its default rate for a federal fiscal year was greater than 40%.

 

If we lose eligibility to participate in Title IV programs because of high student loan default rates, it would have a material adverse effect on our business. Strayer University’s three-year cohort default rates for federal fiscal years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2014,2015, were 11.6%, 11.3%, 13.2%, and 13.2%10.6%, respectively. Capella University’s three-year cohort default rates for federal fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015 were 6.5%, 6.9%, and 6.5%, respectively. The average official cohort default rates for proprietary institutions nationally were 15.8%15.0%, 15.0%15.5%, and 15.5%15.6% for federal fiscal years 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2014,2015, respectively.

 

Strayer University or Capella University could lose its eligibility to participate in federal student financial aid programs or be provisionally certified with respect to such participation if the percentage of ourits revenues derived from those programs were too high, or be restricted from enrolling students in certain states if the percentage of the University’s revenues from federal or state programs were too high.

 

A proprietary institution may lose its eligibility to participate in the federal Title IV student financial aid program if it derives more than 90% of its revenues, on a cash basis, from Title IV programs for two consecutive fiscal years. A proprietary institution of higher education that violates the 90/10 Rule for any fiscal year will be placed on provisional status for up to two fiscal years. Using the formula specified in the Higher Education Act, weStrayer University derived approximately 75%76.0% of ourits cash-basis revenues from these programs in 2016.2017. Capella University derived approximately 75.5% of its cash-basis revenues from Title IV program funds in 2017. Our computationUniversities’ computations for 2017 has2018 have not yet been finalized and audited; however, we believe weeach University will remain in compliance with the 90/10 Rule requirement. Certain members of Congress have proposed to revise the 90/10 Rule to count tuition assistance provided by the Department of Defense and veterans education benefits, along with Title IV revenue, toward the 90% limit and to reduce the limit to 85% of total revenue. Such proposals could make it difficult for usthe Universities to comply with the 90/10 rule. If weone of the Universities were to violate the 90/10 Rule, the loss of eligibility to participate in the federal student financial aid programs would have a material adverse effect on our business. Certain states have also proposed legislation that would prohibit enrollment of their residents based on a state and federal funding threshold that is more restrictive than the federal 90/10 Rule. If such legislation were to be enacted, and the Universities were unable to meet the threshold, loss of eligibility to enroll students in certain states would have a material adverse effect on our business. 

 

Our

48


Table of Contents

The Universities’ failure to comply with the Department of Education’s incentive compensation rules could result in sanctions and other liability.

 

If we payone of the Universities pays a bonus, commission, or other incentive payment in violation of applicable Department of Education rules or if the Department of Education or other third parties interpret oura University’s compensation practices as such, wenoncompliant, the University could be subject to sanctions or other liability, whichliability. Such penalties could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

37


Table of Contents

OurThe Universities’ failure to comply with the Department of Education’s misrepresentation rules could result in sanctions and other liability.

 

The Higher Education Act prohibits an institution that participates in Title IV programs from engaging in “substantial misrepresentation” of the nature of its educational program, its financial charges, or the employability of its graduates. The Department of Education’s Program Integrity Regulations, whichregulations that took effect July 1, 2011, which are sometimes referred to as the program integrity regulations, interpret this provision to prohibit any statement on those topics made by the institution or a third party that provides educational programs, marketing, advertising, recruiting, or admissions services to the institution that has the likelihood or tendency to confuse. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held on June 5, 2012, that the term “substantial misrepresentation” could not include true, nondeceitful statements that are merely confusing. Final regulations to expandthat, among other changes, expanded the definition of misrepresentation to include “any statement that has the likelihood or tendency to mislead under the circumstances” were scheduled to take effect July 1, 2017. The definition also would have been expanded to includeand “any statement that omits information in such a way as to make the statement false, erroneous, or misleading.” On June 16, 2017, themisleading” were scheduled to take effect July 1, 2017. The Department of Education announced that it had decideda series of delays to postpone indefinitely the implementation of certain provisions, including the revised definition. The Department has delayed implementationregulation until July 1, 2019.  2019, but following a judge’s decision in related litigation, the revised regulations went into effect as of October 16, 2018. 

 

In the event of substantial misrepresentation, the Department of Education may revoke an institution’s program participation agreement, limit the institution’s participation in Title IV programs, deny applications from the institution, such as to add new programs or locations, initiate proceedings to fine the institution or limit, suspend, or terminate its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. If the Department of Education or other third parties interpret statements made by usone of the Universities or on ourthe University’s behalf to be in violation of the new regulations, wethe University could be subject to sanctions and other liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

OurThe Universities’ failure to comply with the Department of Education’s credit hour rule could result in sanctions and other liability.

 

Effective July 1, 2011, Title IV regulations define the term “credit hour” and require accrediting agencies and state authorization agencies to review the reliability and accuracy of an institution’s credit hour assignments. If an accreditor does not comply with this requirement, its recognition by the Department of Education could be jeopardized. If an accreditor identifies systematic or significant noncompliance in one or more of an institution’s programs, the accreditor must notify the Secretary of Education. If the Department of Education determines that an institution is out of compliance with the credit hour definition, the Department of Education could impose liabilities or other sanctions, whichsanctions. Such penalties could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

OurThe Universities’ failure to comply with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act or Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 could result in sanctions and other liability.

 

Strayer University and Capella University must comply with the campus safety and security reporting requirements as well as other requirements in the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, (“Clery Act”), including changes made to the Clery Act by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013. On October 20, 2014, the Department of Education promulgated final regulations implementing amendments to the Clery Act. In addition, the Department of Education has interpreted Title IX to categorize sexual violence as a form of prohibited sex discrimination and to require institutions to follow certain disciplinary procedures with respect to such offenses. Failure to comply with the Clery Act or Title IX requirements or regulations thereunder could result in action by the Department of Education to require corrective action, fine the University, or limit or suspend its participation in Title IV programs, which could lead to litigation and could harm the University’s reputation.

49


Table of Contents

 

WeThe Universities are subject to sanctions if wethey fail to calculate accurately and make timely payment of refunds of Title IV program funds for students who withdraw before completing their educational program.

 

The Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations require usthe Universities to calculate refunds of unearned Title IV program funds disbursed to students who withdraw from their educational program before completing it. If refunds are not properly calculated or timely paid, wethe University may be required to post a letter of credit with the Department of

38


Table of Contents

Education or be subject to sanctions or other adverse actions by the Department of Education, whichEducation. Such consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Investigations, legislative and regulatory developments, and general credit market conditions related to the student loan industry may result in fewer lenders and loan products and increased regulatory burdens and costs.

 

The Higher Education Act regulates relationships between lenders to students and post-secondary education institutions. In 2009, the Department of Education promulgated regulations that address these relationships, and state legislators have also passed or may be considering legislation related to relationships between lenders and institutions. In addition, new procedures introduced and recommendations made by the Consumer Financial Protection BureauCFPB create uncertainty about whether Congress will impose new burdens on private student lenders. These developments, as well as legislative and regulatory changes, such as those relating to gainful employment and repayment rates, creating uncertainty in the industry and general credit market conditions, may cause some lenders to decide not to provide certain loan products and may impose increased administrative and regulatory costs. Such actions could reduce demand for, and/or availability of private education loans, decrease Strayer University’s or Capella University’s non-Title IV revenue, and thereby increase Strayer University’s or Capella University’s 90/10 ratio, and have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We rely on one or more third parties for software and services necessary to administer ourthe Universities’ participation in Title IV programs and failure of such a third party to provide compliant software and services, or by us in our use of the software, could cause usthe Universities’ to lose our eligibility to participate in Title IV programs.

 

Because each of Strayer University and Capella University is jointly and severally liable to the Department of Education for the actions of third-party Title IV processing software providers, failure of such providers to comply with applicable regulations could have a material adverse effect on Strayer University or Capella University, including loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. If any of the third-party providers discontinue providing software and services to us,one or both of the Universities, we may not be able to replace them in a timely, cost-efficient, or effective manner, or at all, and wethe Universities could lose ourtheir ability to comply with the requirements of Title IV programs which. Such developments could adversely affect our enrollment, revenues, and results of operations.

 

Our business could be harmed if wethe Universities experience a disruption in ourtheir ability to process student loans under the Federal Direct Loan Program.

 

WeEach of Strayer University and Capella University collected the majority of ourits fiscal year 20172018 total consolidated net revenue from receipt of Title IV financial aid program funds, principally from federal student loans under the Federal Direct Loan Program. Any processing disruptions by the Department of Education may affect our students’ ability to obtain student loans on a timely basis. If we experienceeither of the Universities experiences a disruption in ourits ability to process student loans through the Federal Direct Loan Program, either because of administrative challenges on ourthe part of the University or the inability of the Department of Education to process the volume of direct loans on a timely basis, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely and materially affected.

 

Our business could be harmed if Congress makes changes to the availability of Title IV funds.

 

WeEach of Strayer University and Capella University collected the majority of ourits fiscal year 20172018 total consolidated net revenue from receipt of Title IV financial aid program funds, principally from federal student loans under the Federal Direct Loan Program. Changes in the availability of these funds or a reduction in the amount of funds disbursed may have a material adverse effect on our enrollment, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Congress

50


Table of Contents

eliminated further federal direct subsidized loans for graduate and professional students as of July 1, 2012. On August 9, 2013, Congress passed legislation that ties interest rates on Title IV loans to the rate paid on U.S. Treasury bonds. Interest rates are set every July 1st1st for loans taken out from July 1st1st to June 30th30th of the following year. In July 2012 Congress reduced eligibility for Pell Grants from 18 semesters to 12 semesters. To date, these changes have not had a material impact on our business, but future changes in the availability of Title IV funds could impactaffect students’ ability to fund their education and thus may have a material adverse effect on our enrollment, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

39


 

Table of Contents

EnforcementAs enforcement of laws related to the accessibility of technology continues to evolve, which could result in increased information technology development costs and compliance risks.risks could increase.

 

Strayer University’s and Capella University’s online education programs are made available to students through personal computers and other technological devices. For each of these programs, the curriculum makes use of a combination of graphics, pictures, videos, animations, sounds, and interactive content. Federal agencies, including the Department of Education and the Department of Justice, have considered or are considering how electronic and information technology should be made accessible to persons with disabilities. For example, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or Section 504, prohibits discrimination against a person with a disability by any organization that receives federal financial assistance. The Americans with Disabilities Act or the ADA,(“ADA”), prohibits discrimination based on disability in several areas, including public accommodations. In 2010, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, which enforces Section 504, together with the Department of Justice,which enforces the ADA, asserted that requiring the use of technology in a classroom environment when such technology is inaccessible to individuals with disabilities violates Section 504, unless those individuals are provided accommodations or modifications that permit them to receive all the educational benefits provided by the technology in an equally effective and integrated manner. If Strayer University or Capella University is found to have violated Section 504, it may be required to modify existing content and functionality of its online classroom or other uses of technology, including through adoption of specific technical standards. As a result of such enforcement action, or as a result of new laws and regulations that require greater accessibility, Strayer University or Capella University may have to modify its online classrooms and other uses of technology to satisfy applicable requirements which could requireat potentially substantial financial investment.cost. As with all nondiscrimination laws that apply to recipients of federal financial assistance, an institution may lose access to certain federal financial assistance if it does not comply with Section 504 requirements. In addition, private parties may file or threaten to file lawsuits alleging failure to comply with laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability, such as Section 504 and the ADA, and defending against such actions may require Strayer University or Capella University to incur costs to modify its online classrooms and other uses of technology and costs of litigation.

 

Risks Related to Our Business

 

Our enrollment rate is uncertain, and we may not be able to assess our future enrollments effectively.

 

Our ability to grow enrollment depends on a number of factors, including macroeconomic factors like unemployment and the resulting lower confidence in job prospects, and many of the regulatory risks discussed above. Our enrollment in 20182019 will be affected by legislative uncertainty, regulatory activity, and macroeconomic conditions. It is likely that legislative, regulatory, and economic uncertainties will continue for the foreseeable future, and thus it is difficult to assess our long-term growth prospects. Since 2013, we have selectively closed physical locations of Strayer University to better align our resources in keeping with the increasing preference of our current students for online course delivery. Although we plan to investselectively invest in new campus facilities, and to pursue other growth opportunities in the future, there can be no assurance as to what our growth rate will be or as to the steps we may need to take to adapt to the changing regulatory, legislative, and economic conditions.

 

Adding new locations, programs, and services is dependent on our forecast of the demand for those locations, programs, and services and on regulatory approvals.

 

Adding new locations, programs, and services require us to expend significant resources, including making human capital and financial capital investments, incurring marketing expenses, and reallocating other resources. To open a new location, we are required to obtain appropriate federal, state, and accrediting agency approvals, which may be

51


Table of Contents

conditioned or delayed in a manner that could significantly affect our growth plans. We cannot assure investors that we will open new locations or add new programs or services in the future.

 

Our future success depends in part upon our ability to recruit and retain key personnel.

 

Our success to date has been, and our continuing success will be, substantially dependent upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers, faculty, and administrators, and other key personnel. If we cease to employ any of these integral personnel or fail to manage a smooth transition to new personnel, our business could suffer.

 

40


Table of Contents

Our success depends in part on our ability to update and expand the content of existing academic programs and develop new programs in a cost-effective manner and on a timely basis.

 

Our success depends in part on our ability to update and expand the content of our academic programs, develop new programs in a cost-effective manner, and meet students’ needs in a timely manner. Prospective employers of our graduates increasingly demand that their entry-level employees possess appropriate technological and other skills. The update and expansion of our existing programs and the development of new programs may not be received favorably by students, prospective employers, or the online education market. If we cannot respond to changes in industry requirements, our business may be adversely affected. Even if we are able to develop acceptable new programs, we may not be able to introduce these new programs at all, or as quickly as students require, due to regulatory constraints or as quickly as our competitors introduce competing new programs.

 

Our financial performance depends in part on our ability to continue to developincrease awareness of the academic programs we offer among working adult students.

 

The continued development of awarenessAwareness of the academic programs we offer among working adult students is critical to the continued acceptance and growth of our programs. If we are unableOur inability to continue to developincrease awareness of the programs we offer thisthrough effective marketing and advertising could limit our enrollments and negatively impactaffect our business. The following are some of the factors that could prevent us from successfully marketing our programs:

 

·

the emergence of more successful competitors;

·

customer dissatisfaction with our services and programs;

·

performance problems with our online systems; and

·

our failure to maintain or expand our brand or other factors related to our marketing.

 

Congressional and other governmental activities could damage the reputation of Strayer University or Capella University and limit our ability to attract and retain students.

 

In the last eightrecent years, Congress increased its focus on proprietary educational institutions, including administration of Title IV programs, military tuition assistance, programs, veterans education benefits, and other federal programs. TheDuring the prior Administration, the Department of Education indicated to Congress that it intended to increase its regulation of and attention to proprietary educational institutions, and the Government Accountability Office released several reports of investigations into proprietary educational institutions. In 2014, the DepartmentState Attorneys General have also undertaken extensive investigations of Education announced the creation of an interagency task force to oversee proprietary educational institutions by coordinating the activities of several agencies and promote information sharing among the agencies, which include the Department of Justice, the VA, the CFPB, the FTC, and the SEC, as well as state attorneys general.institutions. These and other governmental activities, including new regulations on program integrity and gainful employment, even if resulting in no adverse findings or actions against Strayer University or Capella University, singly or cumulatively could affect public perception of proprietary higher education, damage the reputation of Strayer University or Capella University, and limit our ability to attract and retain students.

 

We face strong competition in the post-secondary education market.

 

Post-secondary education in the United States is highly competitive. We compete with traditional public and private two-year and four-year colleges, other for-profit schools, and alternatives to higher education, such as employment and military service. Public colleges may offer programs similar to those of Strayer Universityour Universities at a lower tuition level as a result of government subsidies, government and foundation grants, tax-deductible contributions, and other financial sources not available to proprietary institutions. Some of our competitors in both the public and private sectors have

52


Table of Contents

substantially greater financial and other resources than we do. Congress, the Department of Education, and other agencies have required increasing disclosure of information to consumers. While we believe that Strayer University providesour Universities provide valuable education to itstheir students, we may not always accurately predict the drivers of a student or potential students’ decisions to choose among the range of educational and other options available to them. This strong competition could adversely affect our business.

 

41


Table of Contents

StrayerThe Company relies on exclusive proprietary rights and intellectual property, and competitors may attempt to duplicate our programs and methods.

 

Third parties may attempt to develop competing programs or duplicate or copy aspects of our curriculum, online library, quality management, and other proprietary content. Any such attempt, if successful, could adversely affect our business. In the ordinary course of business, we develop intellectual property of many kinds that is or will be the subject of copyright, trademark, service mark, patent, trade secret, or other protections. Such intellectual property includes, but is not limited to, courseware materials for classes taught online and on-ground, and business know-how and internal processes and procedures developed to respond to the requirements of its various education regulatory agencies.

 

Seasonal and other fluctuations in our operating results could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

 

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, which cause our operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. This fluctuation may result in volatility or have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. We experience, and expect to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in our revenue. Historically, our quarterly revenues and income have been lowest in the third quarter (July through September) because fewer students are enrolled during the summer months. We also incur significant expenses in the third quarter in preparing for our peak enrollment in the fourth quarter (October through December), including investing in online and campus infrastructure necessary to support increased usage. These investments result in fluctuations in our operating results which could result in volatility or have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the online education market is a rapidly evolving market, and we may not be able to accurately forecast future enrollment growth and revenues.

 

Regulatory requirements may make it more difficult to acquire us.

 

A change in ownership resulting in a change of control of Strayer University or Capella University would trigger a requirement for recertification of Strayerthe University by the Department of Education for purposes of participation in federal student financial aid programs, a review of Strayerthe University’s accreditation by Middle States,its institutional accrediting agency, and reauthorization of Strayerthe University by certain state licensing and other regulatory agencies. If we or one of the Universities underwent a change of control that required approval by any state authority, Middle States,any institutional accrediting agency, or any federal agency, and any required regulatory approval were significantly delayed, limited, or denied, there could be a material adverse effect on our ability to offer certain educational programs, award certain degrees, diplomas, or certificates, operate one or more of our locations, admit certain students or participate in Title IV programs, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business. These factors may discourage takeover attempts.

 

Capacity constraints or system disruptions to Strayera University’s computer networks could damage the reputation of Strayer Universitythe institutions and limit our ability to attract and retain students.

 

The performance and reliability of Strayer University’sour Universities’ computer networks, especially the online educational platform, is critical to our reputation and ability to attract and retain students. Any system error or failure, or a sudden and significant increase in traffic, could result in the unavailability of Strayerthe University’s computer networks. We cannot assure you that Strayer University,the Universities, including itstheir online educational platform,platforms, will be able to expand itstheir program infrastructure on a timely basis sufficient to meet demand for itstheir programs. Strayer University’sThe Universities’ computer systems and operations could be vulnerable to interruption or malfunction due to events beyond itstheir control, including natural disasters and telecommunications failures. Any interruption to Strayer University’sthe Universities’ computer systems or operations could have a material adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain students.

 

Strayer University’s

53


Table of Contents

The Company’s computer networks may be vulnerable to security risks that could disrupt operations and require itthem to expend significant resources.

 

Strayer University’sThe Company’s computer networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses, and other security problems. A user who circumvents security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions or malfunctions in operations. As a result, Strayer Universitythe Universities may be required to expend significant resources to protect against the threat of these security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches.

 

42


Table of Contents

The personal information that wethe Universities collect is subject to privacy and data security laws and may be vulnerable to breach, theft, or loss that could adversely affect our reputation and operations.

 

Possession and use of personal information in our operations subject us to risks and costs that could harm our business. WeThe Universities collect, use, and retain large amounts of personal information regarding ourtheir students and their families, including social security numbers, tax return information, personal and family financial data, and credit card numbers. We also collect and maintain personal information of our employees in the ordinary course of our business. Some of this personal information is held and managed by certain vendors. Although we use security and business controls to limit access to and use of personal information, a third party may be able to circumvent those security and business controls, which could resultpotentially resulting in a breach of student or employee privacy. In addition, errors in the storage, use, or transmission of personal information could result in a breach of student or employee privacy. Possession and use of personal information in our operations also subjects us to various U.S. state and federal legislative and regulatory burdens that could, among other things, require notification of data breaches and restrict our use of personal information. The risk of hacking and cyber-attacks has increased, as has the sophistication of such attacks, including email phishing schemes targeting employees to give up their credentials. We cannot assure you that a breach, loss, or theft of personal information will not occur. A breach, theft, or loss of personal information regarding our students and their families or our employees that is held by us or our vendors could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and results of operations and result in liability under U.S. state and federal privacy statutes and legal actions by state authorities and private litigants, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, certain of our operations may involve the collection of personal information from individuals outside the U.S., which may render us subject to global privacy and data security laws. For example, the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which becomes enforceablecame into effect May 25, 2018, contains a number of requirements that are different from or exceed those in U.S. state and federal privacy and data security laws. The GDPR may apply to certain of our operations. Were it to apply and if we were out of compliance, there is the potential for administrative, civil, or criminal liability with significant monetary penalties as well as reputational harm to Strayerthe Universities and itstheir employees.

 

Failure to maintain adequate processprocesses to prevent and detect fraudulent activity related to student online enrollment or financial aid could adversely impact ouraffect the Universities’ operations.

 

Our online environment is susceptible to an increased risk of fraudulent activity by outside parties with respect to the student online learning platform and student financial aid programs. While we have been able to detect past incidents of fraudulent activity, which have been isolated, and we have increased our internal capabilities to prevent and detect possible fraudulent activity, we cannot be certain that our systems and processes will continue to be adequate with increasingly sophisticated external fraud schemes. The Department of Education requires institutions that participate in Title IV programs to refer to the Office of the Inspector General any credible information related to fraudulent activity. If we do not maintain adequate systems to prevent and deter such fraudulent activity, the Department of Education may find a lack of “administrative capability” and could limit our access to Title IV funding.

 

Strayer University and Capella University, with itstheir online programs, operatesoperate in a highly competitive market with rapid technological changes and itthey may not compete successfully.

 

Online education is a highly fragmented and competitive market that is subject to rapid technological change. Competitors vary in size and organization from traditional colleges and universities, many of which have some form of online education programs, to for-profit schools, corporate universities, and software companies providing online education and training software. We expect the online education and training market to be subject to rapid changes in technologies. Strayer University’sThe Universities’ success will depend on itstheir ability to adapt to these changing technologies.

Changes in future business conditions could cause business investments and/or recorded goodwill and other long-lived assets to become impaired, resulting in substantial losses and write-downs that would reduce our earnings.

Although we currently have excess fair value of our investments in JWMI and NYCDA over their respective carrying values, goodwill accounts for approximately $21 million of our total assets. Operating performance of these investments, or market-based inputs to the calculations in our goodwill impairment test, could change significantly from our current assumptions. We continue to monitor the recoverability of the carrying value of our goodwill and other long-

43


Table of Contents

lived assets. Significant write-offs of goodwill or other long-lived assets could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and/or results of operations.

Risks Related to our Pending Merger with Capella Education Company

The market price for the combined company shares following the consummation of our merger with Capella may be affected by factors different from or in addition to those that historically have affected or currently affect shares of our common stock.

Upon consummation of our merger with Capella, our stockholders will hold combined company shares. Although Capella operates in the same industry that we do, Capella’s businesses differ from ours, and accordingly the results of operations of the combined company will be affected by some factors that are different from or in addition to those currently affecting our results of operations and those currently affecting Capella’s results of operations. For a discussion of Capella’s businesses, and some important factors to consider in connection with Capella’s businesses, see the documents previously filed with the SEC by Capella (File No. 001-33140), incorporated by reference into the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC by us on December 8, 2017, and referred to under the sections entitled “Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference” and “Where You Can Find More Information”. The joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC by us on December 8, 2017 does not constitute, and the documents filed with the SEC by Capella do not constitute, a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are not incorporated by reference herein.

The merger may not be consummated unless important conditions are satisfied or waived.

The merger agreement contains a number of conditions that must be satisfied or waived (to the extent permitted by applicable law) to consummate the merger. Those conditions include, among others:

·

approval for listing on NASDAQ of the combined company shares issuable in connection with the merger, subject to official notice of issuance;

·

receipt of the requisite regulatory and antitrust approvals, including approvals of certain education regulatory agencies and accrediting bodies; and

·

the absence of any law or order prohibiting the merger.

These conditions to the consummation of the merger may not be satisfied or waived (to the extent permitted by applicable law) and, as a result, the merger may not be consummated at the time expected, or at all. In addition, either Strayer or Capella may elect to terminate the merger agreement in certain other circumstances. For additional information, see the sections entitled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to Consummation of the Merger” and “The Merger Agreement—Termination of the Merger Agreement” in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC by us on December 8, 2017.

The merger agreement contains provisions that could discourage a potential acquirer of us.

The “no-shop” provisions contained in the merger agreement could discourage a potential third-party acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of Strayer from considering or proposing that acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share cash or market value than the market value proposed to be realized in the merger. A potential third-party acquirer maintaining interest in the face of these provisions might propose to pay a lower price to our stockholders than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the $25 million termination fee that may become payable in certain circumstances.

If the merger agreement is terminated and we seek another business combination, we may not be able to negotiate a transaction with another party on terms comparable to, or better than, the terms of our pending merger with Capella.

44


Table of Contents

The pendency of the merger could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Uncertainty about the effect of our pending merger with Capella on employees, suppliers, students and employers of students may have an adverse effect on us. Some students and others who deal with us may seek to change existing relationships with us or delay decisions to continue or expand their relationships with us. Current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles, which may affect our ability to attract, retain,  and motivate key personnel. If employees depart because of issues related to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the business, the combined company following the merger could face disruptions in its operations, loss of existing students, loss of key information, expertise or know-how, and unanticipated additional recruitment and training costs. In addition, the loss of key personnel could diminish the anticipated benefits of the merger.

In addition, the merger agreement restricts us from taking certain actions until the effective time without the consent of Capella, including, among others: the payment of dividends; the issuance of equity (including incentive equity awards); certain increases to employee compensation and benefits; capital expenditures; the incurrence of indebtedness; acquisitions and divestitures; and the entry into or amending certain material contracts. We are required to conduct business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice. The restrictive covenants, which are subject to various specific exceptions, may prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the consummation of the merger. For a description of the restrictive covenants applicable to us, see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—Conduct of Business Pending the Merger” in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC by us on December 8, 2017.

Litigation filed or that may be filed could prevent or delay the consummation of the pending merger.

On November 30, 2017, a Capella shareholder (the “Plaintiff”) filed a putative class action lawsuit against Capella, Strayer, Sarg Sub Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Strayer, and the members of the Capella board of directors, challenging the disclosures made in connection with the pending merger. The lawsuit sought to enjoin the merger, recover damages upon consummation of the merger, attorney’s fees, and other relief. For additional information, see the description set forth in Item 3 below. On January 29, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, without prejudice.

Similar lawsuits and/or claims may be received by us, our board of directors, Sarg Sub Inc., Capella or Capella’s board of directors in the future. The outcomes of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict and could delay or prevent our pending merger with Capella from becoming effective in a timely manner. One of the conditions to the closing of the merger is that no governmental authority has issued or entered any order after the date of the merger agreement having the effect of enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the merger. Potential lawsuits in the future may seek an order enjoining the consummation of the merger. Accordingly, if a future lawsuit is successful in obtaining an order enjoining the consummation of the merger, then such order may prevent the merger from being consummated, or from being consummated within the expected time frame, and could result in substantial costs to us including, but not limited to, costs associated with the indemnification of directors and officers. Any such injunction or delay in the merger being completed may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our stockholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest in the combined company after the merger and will exercise less influence over management.

Our stockholders currently have the right to vote in the election of our board of directors and on other matters affecting us. Upon consummation of the merger, each Strayer stockholder will be a stockholder of the combined company with a percentage ownership of the combined company that is smaller than the stockholder’s prior percentage ownership of Strayer. After consummation of the merger, Strayer stockholders are expected to own approximately 52% of the issued and outstanding combined company shares on a fully diluted basis. Because of this, Strayer stockholders will have less influence on the management and policies of the combined company than they now have on the management and policies of Strayer.

4554


 

Table of Contents

 

Failure to consummate the merger could negatively impact our future stock price, operationsCombining SEI and financial results.

If the merger is not consummated for any reason, we may be subjected to a number of material risks, including the following:

·

a possible decline in the market price of our common stock to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the merger will be consummated and will be beneficial to the value of the business of the combined company;

·

having to pay certain costs related to the pending merger, such as legal, accounting, financial advisory, printing, and mailing fees, which must be paid regardless of whether the merger is consummated;

·

addressing any loss of personnel and/or students that may have occurred since the announcement of the signing of the merger agreement, as a result of uncertainty regarding the employee or student relationship with the combined company;

·

addressing the consequences of operational decisions made since the signing of the merger agreement either because of restrictions on our operations imposed by the terms of the merger agreement, including decisions to delay or defer capital expenditures;

·

returning the focus of management and personnel to operating theCapella Education Company on a stand-alone basis, without any of the benefits expected to have been provided by the consummation of the merger; and

·

negative reactions from our stockholders, students, suppliers, and employees.

In addition to the above risks, we may be required, under certain circumstances, to pay a termination fee of up to $25 million to Capella, and in some cases reimburse Capella’s expenses up to $8 million, which may materially adversely affect our financial condition.

If the merger is not consummated, we cannot assure our stockholders that these risks will not materialize and will not materially adversely affect the business, financial results, and stock price of the Company. Failure to consummate the merger could also materially adversely affect our stock price to the extent the current market price reflects a market premium based on the assumption that the merger will be consummated and will be beneficial to the value of the business of the combined company.

The pending merger may disrupt attention of our management from ongoing business operations.

We have expended, and expect to continue to expend, significant management resources to consummate the merger. The attention of our management may be diverted away from the day-to-day operations of our businesses, including implementing initiatives to improve performance and execution of existing business plans in an effort to consummate the merger. This diversion of management resources could disrupt our operations and may have an adverse effect on our businesses, financial conditions and results of operations or that of the combined company.

The consummation of the merger is subject to the receipt of consents and approvals from government and regulatory entities, which may impose conditions that could have a material adverse effect on us or could cause us to abandon the merger.

The governmental and regulatory agencies from which we will seek approvals have broad discretion in administering the applicable government regulations.

On November 22, 2017, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission granted early termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended.

Regulatory approvals will be required in connection with the merger from certain education agencies. On February 27, 2018, the U.S. Department of Education completed its pre-acquisition review of the transaction without any material conditions, but additional closing conditions apply including approval by the Higher Learning Commission (the “HLC”). In addition, Strayer is notifying all of the education regulatory agencies that approve Strayer University of the merger.

46


Table of Contents

Although it is not expected that this merger constitutes a change of control for Strayer University, it is possible that some of those agencies may require approval of the merger, or subject Strayer University to a review in connection with the merger.

There can be no assurance that all of the necessary educational agency regulatory approvals required to consummate the merger will be obtained and, if obtained, there can be no assurance as to the timing of any approvals, the ability to obtain the approvals on satisfactory terms, or that the conditions will not result in the abandonment of the merger. For additional information, see the sections entitled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to Consummation of the Merger,” “The Merger—Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger,” and “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to Consummation of the Merger” in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC by us on December 8, 2017.

The merger agreement may require us to accept conditions from certain regulators that could limit the combined company after the consummation of the merger without us having the right to refuse to consummate the merger on the basis of those regulatory conditions, except that for certain education regulators, we or Capella may refuse to consummate the merger if any such conditions individually or in the aggregate, would reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on the combined company following the consummation of the merger.

Any delay in the consummation of the merger for regulatory reasons could diminish the anticipated benefits of the merger or result in additional transaction costs. Any uncertainty over the ability to consummate the merger could make it more difficult for us to maintain or pursue particular business strategies. Conditions imposed by regulatory agencies in connection with their approval of the merger may restrict the combined company’s ability to modify its operations or the combined company’s ability to expend cash for other uses or otherwise have a material adverse effect on, or delay, the anticipated benefits of the merger.

The merger may not be accretive and may cause dilution to the combined company’s earnings per share, which may negatively affect the market price of the combined company shares.

Because shares of Strayer common stock will be issued in the merger, it is possible that, although we currently expect the merger to be accretive to earnings per share in 2019, excluding one-time charges, the merger may be dilutive to earnings per share, which could negatively affect the market price of combined company shares.

In connection with the consummation of the merger, we expect to issue approximately 10.5 million shares of Strayer common stock. The issuance of these new shares of Strayer common stock could have the effect of depressing the market price of shares of Strayer common stock (referred to as combined company shares as of the consummation of and following the merger) through dilution of earnings per share or otherwise.

In addition, future events and conditions could increase the dilution that is currently projected, including adverse changes in market conditions, additional transaction and integration related costs and other factors such as the failure to realize some or all of the benefits anticipated in the merger. Any dilution of, or delay in any accretion to, earnings per share could cause the price of the combined company shares to decline or grow at a reduced rate.

Risks Related to the Business of the Combined Company

Combining Strayer and Capella may be more difficult, costly or time consuming than expected, and the combined company may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of the merger.

 

Strayer and Capella have operated and, until the consummation of the merger, will continue to operate, independently. The success of the mergerCompany will depend on, among other things, the combined company’sour ability to combine the businesses of StrayerSEI and CapellaCEC in a manner that does not materially disrupt the existing student relationships of either StrayerSEI or CapellaCEC or adversely affect current revenues and investments in future growth. Additionally, the combined companyCompany may not be able to successfully achieve the level of cost savings, revenue enhancements and synergies that it expects. If the combined companyCompany is not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the mergerMerger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.

47


Table of Contents

In addition, the continued operation of two independent businesses within the combined company may be a complex, costly,The goodwill and time-consuming process. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:

·

the diversion of management attention to integration matters;

·

difficulties in integrating functions, personnel, and systems;

·

challenges in conforming standards, controls, procedures and accounting, and other policies, business cultures, and compensation structures between the two companies;

·

difficulties in assimilating employees and in attracting and retaining key personnel;

·

challenges in keeping existing students and enrolling new students;

·

difficulties in maintaining consistency in educational programs across platforms;

·

challenges related to maintaining accreditations with multiple accreditors and working with multiple oversight bodies;

·

difficulties in achieving anticipated cost savings, synergies, business opportunities, and growth prospects from the combination;

·

difficulties in managing multiple brands under a significantly larger and more complex company;

·

difficulties operating Strayer University and Capella University as separate legal entities;

·

contingent liabilities that are larger than expected; and

·

potential unknown liabilities, adverse consequences, and unforeseen increased expenses associated with the merger.

Many of these factors are outside of our control and will be outside the control of the combined company, and any one of them could result in increased costs, decreased expected revenues and diversion of management time and energy, which could materially impact the business, financial condition and results of operations of the combined company. In addition, even if the businesses of Strayer and Capella are operated successfully within the combined company, the full anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized, including the expected synergies. These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame, or at all. Further, additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in operating the businesses of Strayer and Capella. All of these factors could cause dilution to the earnings per share of the combined company, decrease or delay the expected accretive effect of the merger and negatively impact the price of the combined company shares. As a result, it cannot be assured that the combined company will realize the full benefits anticipated from the merger within the anticipated time frames, or at all.

Following the consummation of the merger, the composition of the combined company board of directors and the management team will be different from the composition of the current board of directors and management teams of Strayer and Capella, which may affect the strategy and operations of the combined company.

Following the consummation of the merger, the board of directors of the combined company will consist of (a) nine directors designated by Strayer, (b) J. Kevin Gilligan, Chief Executive Officer of Capella, and (c) two additional designees who are currently members of the Capella board of directors and are recommended by Mr. Gilligan. In addition, one of the two additional Capella designees will be appointed to serve on the Compensation Committee of the combined company.

Robert Silberman will continue as Executive Chairman of the board of directors of the combined company and Mr. Gilligan will be appointed as Vice Chairman at the effective time. Karl McDonnell, Strayer’s current President and Chief Executive Officer, and Daniel W. Jackson, Strayer’s current Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will continue in their respective positions at the combined company following the effective time. Steven L. Polacek, Capella’s current Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer will be appointed as the Chief Integration/Transition Officer of the combined company.

This new composition of the board of directors and management team may affect the combined company’s business strategy and operating decisions following the consummation of the merger, as compared to those of Strayer and Capella prior to the merger. In addition, there can be no assurances that the new board of directors and management team will

48


Table of Contents

function effectively as a team and that any differences or difficulties, should they arise, will not have an adverse effect on the combined company’s business or results.

We will incur substantial direct and indirect costs as a result of the merger.

We will incur substantial expensesindefinite-lived intangible assets recorded in connection with and as a result of consummating the merger, and over a period of time following the consummation of the merger, the combined company also expects to incur substantial expenses in connection with coordinating and, in certain cases, combining the businesses, operations, policies, and procedures of Strayer and Capella. A portion of the transaction costs related to the merger will be incurred regardless of whether the merger is consummated. While we have assumed that a certain level of transaction expenses will be incurred, factors beyond our control could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses. Although many of the expenses that we will be incurred, by their nature, are difficult to estimate accurately, the current estimate of the aggregate expenses that we will incur is between $15-20 million in 2018, which is subject to change. These costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations prior to the merger and those of the combined company following the consummation of the merger.

The combined company is expected to record a significant amount of goodwill as a result of the merger, and such goodwillMerger could become impaired in the future.

 

Accounting standards in the United States require that one party to the merger be identified as the acquirer. In accordance with these standards, the merger will beMerger was accounted for as an acquisition of CapellaCEC common stock by Strayerthe Company and will followfollowed the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. The StrayerCompany’s assets and liabilities  will bewere consolidated with those of CapellaCEC on our financial statements. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of Capella’sCEC’s assets and liabilities will bewere recorded as goodwill.

 

The combined companyWe will be required to assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually. To the extent goodwill becomesor indefinite-lived intangible assets become impaired, the combined companywe may be required to incur material charges relating to such impairment. Such a potential impairment charge could have a material impact on future operating results and statements of financial position of the combined company.Company.

 

Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments

 

There are no SEC staff comments on our periodic SEC reports which are unresolved.

 

Item 2.      Properties

 

Except for five campus facilities which we own, our Strayer University and Capella University campus and administrative facilities are leased. Our facilities are located predominantly in the eastern United States. The Company’s corporate headquarters is located at 2303 Dulles Station Blvd., Herndon, VA 20171, while20171. Our primary location in Minneapolis, also the headquarters for Capella University, is located at 225 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402. The headquarters and main campus of Strayer University is located at 1133 15th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20005. Our leases generally range from five to ten years with one to two renewal options for extended terms. As of December 31, 2017, we2018, Strayer University and Capella University leased 81 campus and administrative facilities consisting of approximately 1.41.5 million square feet. The facilities that we own consist of approximately 110,000 square feet.

DevMountain occupies a total of approximately 40,300 square feet of office and classroom space in Provo, UT, Salt Lake City, UT, Phoenix, AZ, and Dallas, TX. Additionally, DevMountain recently entered into a short-term sublease for approximately 12,600 square feet of space in Lehi, UT. DevMountain also leases related residential space in these same cities. Hackbright occupies its primary office and classroom space of approximately 9,600 square feet in San Francisco, CA. NYCDA is party to certain real estate leases for small amounts of space, including approximately 5,500 square feet in Manhattan, N.Y. for its corporate offices and classroom space.

 

As announced in October 2013, we closed 20 Strayer University physical locations, predominantly in the Midwest. We subleased or terminated arrangements on most of this space, and to date, approximately 41,000 square feet remains vacant, with remaining lease obligations ranging from six months to five years. We continuously evaluate various options to address unused facility space including sublets, both short-term and long-term, and lease buyouts. In 2017,2018, we reduced our leased facility footprint by approximately 166,000151,000 square feet, primarily by reducing the size of existing campuses at the time of lease renewal.

 

55


Table of Contents

We evaluate current utilization of our facilities and anticipated enrollment to determine facility needs. In 2018,2019, we plan to open threesix to fiveeight new Strayer University campus locations. The first new campus, located in Macon, Georgia,Strayer University campuses will open for the start of the spring academic term. The Macon campusin Mobile, AL and subsequent newFort Worth, TX. New Strayer University campuses will incorporate a new smaller cost-

49


Table of Contents

efficientcost-efficient design intended to service a student body that values a brick and mortar presence, even while taking an increasing majoritynumber of their courses online. Additionally, Capella University plans to open two new brick and mortar locations in Atlanta, GA and Orlando, FL in 2019.

 

For more information regarding our ongoing lease commitments, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements below.

 

Item 3.      Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation and other legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of its business. There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than routine litigation incidental to the business, to which we are subject or to which our property is subject.

On November 30, 2017, a Capella shareholder (the “Plaintiff”) filed a putative class action against Capella, Strayer, Sarg Sub Inc.  (a wholly owned subsidiary of Strayer), and the members of Capella’s board of directors (together, the “Defendants”) challenging the disclosures made in connection with our pending merger with Capella. The lawsuit, styled Adam Franchi v. Capella Education Company, et al., No. 0:17-cv-05288-JRT-DTS, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The Plaintiff's complaint alleged that the registration statement filed in connection with our pending merger with Capella failed to disclose certain allegedly material information in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder. The alleged omissions related to (i) certain financial projections by the companies and certain financial analyses performed by Capella’s financial advisor; and (ii) certain alleged potential conflicts of interest of Capella’s officers and directors. The Plaintiff sought to enjoin Defendants from proceeding with the merger, recover damages in the event the merger was consummated, attorney's fees, and other relief. On January 29, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, without prejudice.

 

Item 4.      Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

5056


 

Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

Item 5.      Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “STRA.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, and closing sale prices of our common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Close

 

2016

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

59.99

 

$

42.39

 

$

48.75

 

Second Quarter

 

$

50.69

 

$

44.02

 

$

49.13

 

Third Quarter

 

$

51.74

 

$

43.50

 

$

46.68

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

83.92

 

$

44.63

 

$

80.63

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

83.88

 

$

71.31

 

$

80.49

 

Second Quarter

 

$

95.74

 

$

75.84

 

$

93.22

 

Third Quarter

 

$

94.99

 

$

76.40

 

$

87.27

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

100.72

 

$

86.03

 

$

89.58

 

As of February 1, 2018,2019, there were 11,161,26621,745,913 shares of common stock outstanding, and approximately 7678 holders of record.

 

We did not pay a dividend in 2016. On February 14,In 2017, our Board of Directors approved an annual cash dividend of $1.00 per common share during 2017. This resulted in a quarterly dividend payment of $0.25 per common share. Our Board of Directors approved a quarterly dividend payment of $0.25 per common share in the first and second quarters of 2018 and a quarterly dividend payment of $0.50 per common share in the third and fourth quarters of 2018. Whether to declare dividends and the amount of dividends to be paid in the future will be reviewed periodically by our Board of Directors in light of our earnings, cash flow, financial condition, capital needs, investment opportunities, and regulatory considerations. There is no requirement or assurance that common dividends will be paid in the future.

 

Peer Group Performance Graph

 

The following performance graph compares the cumulative stockholder return on our common stock since December 31, 20122013 with The NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index and a self-determined peer group consisting of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. (ATGE), American Public Education, Inc. (APEI), Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (BPI), Capella Education Company (CPLA), Career Education Corporation (CECO), Chegg, Inc. (CHGG), Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE), K12 Inc. (LRN), Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC)Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR), and Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI). The peer group no longer includes Apollo Education Group, Inc. as it ceased to be a public company in 2017., Capella Education Company, or Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. DeVry Education Group is still included in the peer group but under its new name Adtalem Global Education, Inc. At present, there is no comparative index for the education industry. This graph is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be filed with the SEC or subject to the SEC’s proxy rules or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and the graph shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our prior or subsequent filings under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

 

5157


 

Table of Contents

Comparison of 60 Month Cumulative Total Return*

Among StrayerStrategic Education, Inc.

The NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index and a Peer Group

 

Picture 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

    

12/31/12

    

12/31/13

    

12/31/14

    

12/31/15

    

12/31/16

    

12/31/17

 

    

12/31/13

    

12/31/14

    

12/31/15

    

12/31/16

    

12/31/17

    

12/31/18

 

Strayer Education, Inc.

 

100

 

61

 

132

 

107

 

144

 

159

 

Strategic Education, Inc.

 

100

 

215

 

174

 

234

 

260

 

329

 

NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.)

 

100

 

138

 

157

 

166

 

178

 

229

 

 

100

 

113

 

120

 

129

 

165

 

159

 

Peer Group

 

100

 

151

 

143

 

88

 

144

 

163

 

 

100

 

96

 

67

 

95

 

124

 

149

 


*The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 20122013 in our common stock, the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index, and the peer companies selected by us.

 

There were no sales by us of unregistered securities during the year ended December 31, 2017.2018.

 

Stock Repurchase Program

 

In November 2003, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase shares of common stock in open market purchases from time to time at the discretion of our management, depending on market conditions and other corporate considerations. Our Board of Directors amended the program on various dates, increasing the repurchase amount authorized and extending the expiration date. At December 31, 2017,2018, $70.0 million of our share repurchase authorization

52


Table of Contents

was remaining for repurchases through the end of 2018.2019. All of our share repurchases have been effected in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act. Some repurchases have been made in accordance with a share repurchase plan adopted by us under Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. Our share repurchase program may be modified, suspended, or terminated at any time by us without notice.

58


Table of Contents

 

A summary of our share repurchases since the inception of the plan is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Total

    

Average dollar

    

 

 

 

    

Total

    

Average dollar

    

 

 

 

 

number of

 

price

 

Cost of share

 

 

number of

 

price

 

Cost of share

 

 

shares

 

paid per

 

repurchases

 

 

shares

 

paid per

 

repurchases

 

 

repurchased

 

share

 

(millions)

 

 

repurchased

 

share

 

(millions)

 

2003

 

32,350

 

$

99.57

 

$

3.2

 

 

32,350

 

$

99.57

 

$

3.2

 

2004

 

346,444

 

 

106.13

 

 

36.8

 

 

346,444

 

 

106.13

 

 

36.8

 

2005

 

410,071

 

 

92.59

 

 

38.0

 

 

410,071

 

 

92.59

 

 

38.0

 

2006

 

349,066

 

 

100.39

 

 

35.0

 

 

349,066

 

 

100.39

 

 

35.0

 

2007

 

260,818

 

 

146.05

 

 

38.1

 

 

260,818

 

 

146.05

 

 

38.1

 

2008

 

603,382

 

 

180.86

 

 

109.1

 

 

603,382

 

 

180.86

 

 

109.1

 

2009

 

451,613

 

 

177.34

 

 

80.1

 

 

451,613

 

 

177.34

 

 

80.1

 

2010

 

687,340

 

 

168.06

 

 

115.5

 

 

687,340

 

 

168.06

 

 

115.5

 

2011

 

1,581,444

 

 

128.15

 

 

202.7

 

 

1,581,444

 

 

128.15

 

 

202.7

 

2012

 

484,841

 

 

51.56

 

 

25.0

 

 

484,841

 

 

51.56

 

 

25.0

 

2013

 

495,085

 

 

50.49

 

 

25.0

 

 

495,085

 

 

50.49

 

 

25.0

 

2014

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

2015

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

2016

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

2017

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

2018

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Total

 

5,702,454

 

$

124.24

 

$

708.5

 

 

5,702,454

 

$

124.24

 

$

708.5

 

 

We did not make any share repurchases in 2014 through 2017.2018.

5359


 

Table of Contents

Item 6.      Selected Financial Data

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods and at the dates indicated, selected consolidated financial and operating data. The financial information has been derived from our consolidated financial statements. Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 include the results of CEC from the merger date, and prior periods do not include the financial results of CEC prior to the merger date. The information set forth below is qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other information included elsewhere or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

    

2014

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

 

 

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

503,600

 

$

446,041

 

$

434,437

 

$

441,088

 

$

454,851

 

 

$

446,041

 

$

434,437

 

$

441,088

 

$

454,851

 

$

634,185

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instruction and educational support

 

 

310,446

 

 

236,303

 

 

234,097

 

 

241,026

 

 

245,177

 

 

 

240,441

 

 

234,145

 

 

242,099

 

 

249,939

 

 

340,076

 

Marketing

 

 

75,426

 

 

66,495

 

 

70,084

 

 

79,025

 

 

82,574

 

 

 

66,495

 

 

70,084

 

 

79,025

 

 

82,540

 

 

136,979

 

Admissions advisory

 

 

20,390

 

 

16,661

 

 

16,304

 

 

17,832

 

 

19,494

 

 

 

16,661

 

 

16,304

 

 

17,832

 

 

19,004

 

 

31,466

 

General and administration

 

 

64,637

 

 

44,835

 

 

44,254

 

 

45,733

 

 

55,397

 

 

 

44,835

 

 

44,647

 

 

47,873

 

 

46,792

 

 

57,056

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

25,694

 

Merger costs

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,879

 

 

45,745

 

Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets

 

 

(4,138)

 

 

(441)

 

 

(3,213)

 

 

(7,512)

 

 

19,909

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

470,899

 

 

364,294

 

 

364,739

 

 

383,616

 

 

402,642

 

 

 

364,294

 

 

364,739

 

 

383,616

 

 

402,642

 

 

656,925

 

Income from operations

 

 

32,701

 

 

81,747

 

 

69,698

 

 

57,472

 

 

52,209

 

Investment and other income

 

 

 2

 

 

117

 

 

283

 

 

462

 

 

1,079

 

Interest expense

 

 

5,419

 

 

5,248

 

 

3,850

 

 

642

 

 

642

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

27,284

 

 

76,616

 

 

66,131

 

 

57,292

 

 

52,646

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

10,859

 

 

30,260

 

 

26,108

 

 

22,490

 

 

32,034

 

Net income

 

$

16,425

 

$

46,356

 

$

40,023

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

 

81,747

 

 

69,698

 

 

57,472

 

 

52,209

 

 

(22,740)

 

Other income (expense)

 

 

(5,131)

 

 

(3,567)

 

 

(180)

 

 

437

 

 

3,601

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

76,616

 

 

66,131

 

 

57,292

 

 

52,646

 

 

(19,139)

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

30,260

 

 

26,108

 

 

22,490

 

 

32,034

 

 

(3,468)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

46,356

 

$

40,023

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

$

(15,671)

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.55

 

$

4.39

 

$

3.78

 

$

3.28

 

$

1.93

 

 

$

4.39

 

$

3.78

 

$

3.28

 

$

1.93

 

$

(1.03)

 

Diluted

 

$

1.55

 

$

4.35

 

$

3.73

 

$

3.21

 

$

1.84

 

 

$

4.35

 

$

3.73

 

$

3.21

 

$

1.84

 

$

(1.03)

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

10,584

 

 

10,561

 

 

10,588

 

 

10,610

 

 

10,678

 

 

 

10,561

 

 

10,588

 

 

10,610

 

 

10,678

 

 

15,190

 

Diluted(a)

 

 

10,624

 

 

10,650

 

 

10,740

 

 

10,845

 

 

11,199

 

 

 

10,650

 

 

10,740

 

 

10,845

 

 

11,199

 

 

15,190

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

35,563

 

$

20,630

 

$

18,104

 

$

17,817

 

$

18,733

 

 

$

20,630

 

$

18,104

 

$

17,817

 

$

18,733

 

$

54,543

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

$

9,291

 

$

9,453

 

$

10,213

 

$

10,767

 

$

11,627

 

 

$

9,453

 

$

10,213

 

$

10,767

 

$

11,627

 

$

15,532

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

8,726

 

$

6,902

 

$

12,692

 

$

13,161

 

$

18,051

 

 

$

6,902

 

$

12,692

 

$

13,161

 

$

18,051

 

$

27,547

 

Cash dividends per common share (paid)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

1.00

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

1.00

 

$

1.50

 

Average enrollment(b)

 

 

43,969

 

 

40,254

 

 

40,450

 

 

41,556

 

 

44,155

 

 

 

40,254

 

 

40,450

 

 

41,556

 

 

44,155

 

 

47,733

 

Strayer University Campuses(c)

 

 

100

 

 

79

 

 

76

 

 

74

 

 

71

 

 

 

79

 

 

76

 

 

74

 

 

71

 

 

72

 

Full-time employees(d)

 

 

1,485

 

 

1,455

 

 

1,401

 

 

1,542

 

 

1,389

 

 

 

1,455

 

 

1,401

 

 

1,542

 

 

1,389

 

 

3,017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

    

2013

    

2014

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities

 

$

94,760

 

$

162,283

 

$

106,889

 

$

129,245

 

$

155,933

 

Working capital(e)

 

 

82,182

 

 

140,316

 

 

74,761

 

 

100,704

 

 

121,282

 

Total assets

 

 

254,266

 

 

307,815

 

 

248,434

 

 

298,696

 

 

321,278

 

Long-term debt

 

 

118,750

 

 

112,500

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

51,456

 

 

46,248

 

 

47,987

 

 

50,483

 

 

43,015

 

Total liabilities

 

 

215,364

 

 

215,083

 

 

105,578

 

 

110,322

 

 

112,081

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

38,902

 

 

92,732

 

 

142,856

 

 

188,374

 

 

209,197

 

60


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

    

2014

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities

 

$

162,283

 

$

106,889

 

$

129,245

 

$

155,933

 

$

386,531

 

Working capital(e)

 

 

140,316

 

 

74,761

 

 

100,704

 

 

121,282

 

 

295,230

 

Total assets

 

 

307,815

 

 

248,434

 

 

298,696

 

 

321,278

 

 

1,661,029

 

Long-term debt

 

 

112,500

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

46,248

 

 

47,987

 

 

50,483

 

 

43,015

 

 

110,674

 

Total liabilities

 

 

215,083

 

 

105,578

 

 

110,322

 

 

112,081

 

 

235,805

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

92,732

 

 

142,856

 

 

188,374

 

 

209,197

 

 

1,425,224

 


(a)

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding include common shares issued and outstanding, and the dilutive impact of restricted stock, restricted stock units, and outstanding stock options using the Treasury Stock Method.

54


Table of Contents

 

(b)

Reflects average Strayer University student enrollment for the four academic terms for each year indicated.

 

(c)

Reflects number of Strayer University campuses offering classes during the fourth quarter of each year indicated. In October 2013, we announced that 20 physical locations would be closed after classes were taught in the fall academic term.

 

(d)

Reflects full-time employees, including full-time faculty, as of December 31 of each year indicated.

 

(e)

Working capital is calculated by subtracting current liabilities from current assets.

 

Item 7.      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data,” our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, the “Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” Item 1A entitled “Risk Factors,” and the other information appearing elsewhere, or incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Background and Overview

 

We areStrategic Education, Inc. (“SEI,” “we”, “us” or “our”) is an education services holding company that ownsseeks to provide the most direct path between learning and employment through campus-based and online post-secondary education offerings and through programs to develop job-ready skills for high-demand markets. We operate primarily through our wholly-owned subsidiaries Strayer University (the “University”) and as of January 13, 2016, the New York Code and Design Academy (“NYCDA”). TheCapella University, is an institutionboth accredited post-secondary institutions of higher education which offers undergraduate and graduate degreeeducation. Our operations also include certain non-degree programs, at physical campuses, predominantly located in the eastern United States, and online. NYCDA provides non-degree courses in webmainly focused on software and application software development, primarily at campuses in New York City and Philadelphia, PA. NYCDA’s results of operations are included in our results from the acquisition date.development. 

 

In October 2017,Acquisition of Capella Education Company

On August 1, 2018, we entered into acompleted our merger agreement with Capella Education Company (“Capella”CEC”). Capella pursuant to a merger agreement dated October 29, 2017. The merger solidifies our position as a national leader in education innovation, and provides post-secondary educationscale that will enable greater investment in improving student academic and job-skills programs primarily through its subsidiary Capella University. Capella had approximately 38,000 studentscareer outcomes while maintaining our focus on affordability. The merger is also expected to create significant cost synergies for us.

Pursuant to the merger, we issued 0.875 shares of our common stock for each issued and outstanding share of CEC common stock. Outstanding equity awards held by CEC employees and certain nonemployee directors of CEC were assumed by us and converted into comparable SEI awards at December 31, 2016, its revenuethe exchange ratio. Outstanding equity awards held by CEC nonemployee directors who did not serve as directors of SEI after completion of the merger, and awards held by former employees of CEC who left before completion of the merger were settled upon completion of the merger as specified in the merger agreement.

Our financial results for 2016 was $429.4any periods ended prior to August 1, 2018 do not include the financial results of CEC, and are therefore not directly comparable. In 2017, CEC’s revenues were $440.4 million, and its net income from continuing operations in 2016 was $42.4$23.4 million. The merger was approved by our shareholders and by Capella’s stockholders on January 19, 2018. Upon consummation of the merger, Capella will become our wholly-owned subsidiary and will continue to offer its education programs through Capella University.

 

Set forth below are average Strayer University enrollment, full-time undergraduate tuition rates, revenues, income from operations, net income, and diluted net income per share for the last three years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2015

      

2016

      

2017

 

Average enrollment

 

 

40,450

 

 

41,556

 

 

44,155

 

    % Change from prior year

 

 

<1%

 

 

3%

 

 

6%

 

Full-time tuition for a new student (per course)

 

$

1,420

 

$

1,420

 

$

1,435

 

    % Change from prior year

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1%

 

Revenues (in thousands)

 

$

434,437

 

$

441,088

 

$

454,851

 

    % Change from prior year

 

 

(3%)

 

 

2%

 

 

3%

 

Income from operations (in thousands)

 

$

69,698

 

$

57,472

 

$

52,209

 

    % Change from prior year

 

 

(15%)

 

 

(18%)

 

 

(9%)

 

Net income (in thousands)

 

$

40,023

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

    % Change from prior year

 

 

(14%)

 

 

(13%)

 

 

(41%)

 

Diluted net income per share

 

$

3.73

 

$

3.21

 

$

1.84

 

    % Change from prior year

 

 

(14%)

 

 

(14%)

 

 

(43%)

 

Most of our revenue comes from the University, which derives approximately 96% of its revenue from tuition for educational programs, whether delivered in person at a physical campus or delivered online. The academic year of the University is divided into four quarters, which approximately coincide with the four quarters of the calendar year. Students at the University and at NYCDA make payment arrangements for the tuition for each course at the time of enrollment. Tuition revenue is recognized ratably over the course of instruction. If a student withdraws from a course prior to completion, the University refunds a portion of the tuition depending on when the withdrawal occurs. Tuition

5561


 

Table of Contents

revenue is shown net of any refunds, withdrawals, corporate discounts, employee tuition discounts, and scholarships. The University also derives revenue from other sources such as textbook-related income, certificate revenue, certain academic fees, licensing revenue, and other income, which are all recognized when earned.

Tuition receivable and deferred revenue for our students are recorded uponDuring the start of the course, which for the University, is the start of the academic term. Because the University’s academic quarters coincide with the calendar quarters, at the end of the fiscal quarter (and academic term), tuition receivable generally represents amounts due from students for educational services already provided and deferred revenue generally represents advance payments for academic services to be provided in the future. Based upon past experience and judgment, the University establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts with respect to accounts receivable. Any uncollected account more than one year past due is charged against the allowance. Accounts less than one year past due are reserved according to the length of time the balance has been outstanding. In establishing reserve amounts, we also consider the status of students as to whether or not they are currently enrolled for the next term, as well as the likelihood of recovering balances that have previously been written off, based on historical experience. Bad debt expense as a percentage of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016,2018, we incurred $45.7 million in expenses related to the merger, primarily attributable to financial advisory fees, consulting costs, legal fees, personnel, and 2017, was 3.0%, 3.7% and 4.8%, respectively.other integration costs.

 

Below is a descriptionAs of December 31, 2018, SEI had the nature of the costs included in our operating expense categories:following reportable segments:

 

Strayer University Segment

·

InstructionStrayer University is an institution of higher learning that offers undergraduate and educational support expenses generally contain itemsgraduate degree programs in business administration, accounting, information technology, education, health services administration, public administration, and criminal justice at more than 70 physical campuses, predominantly located in the eastern United States, and online. Strayer University is accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (hereinafter referred to as “Middle States” or “Middle States Commission”), one of expense directly attributable to educational activities. This expense category includes salariesthe six regional collegiate accrediting agencies recognized by the Department. By offering its programs both online and benefits of facultyin physical classrooms, Strayer University provides its working adult students flexibility and academic administrators, as well as administrative personnel who support faculty and students. Instruction and educational support expenses also include costs of educational supplies and facilities, including rent for campus facilities, certain costs of establishing and maintaining computer laboratories, and all other physical plant and occupancy costs, with the exception of costs attributable to the corporate offices. Bad debt expense incurred on delinquent student account balances is also included in instruction and educational support expenses.convenience.

 

·

Marketing expenses include the costs of advertisingThe Jack Welch Management Institute (“JWMI”) offers an executive MBA online and production of marketing materials and related personnel costs.is a Top 25 Princeton Review ranked online MBA program.

 

·

Admissions advisory expenses include salaries, benefits,In 2018, Strayer University’s average total enrollment increased 8.1% to 47,733 students compared to 44,155 students in 2017. New student enrollment for the period increased 8.7%.

Capella University Segment

·

Capella University is an online post-secondary education company that offers a variety of doctoral, master’s and related costsbachelor’s degree programs, primarily for working adults, in the following primary disciplines: public service leadership, nursing and health sciences, social and behavioral sciences, business and technology, education, and undergraduate studies. Capella University focuses on master's and doctoral degrees, with 70% of personnel engagedits learners enrolled in admissions.a master’s or doctoral degree program. Capella University's academic offerings are built with competency-based curricula and are delivered in an online format that is convenient and flexible. Capella University designs its offerings to help working adult learners develop specific competencies they can apply in their workplace. Capella University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, one of the six regional collegiate accrediting agencies recognized by the Department.

 

·

General and administration expenses include salaries and benefits of management and employees engagedIn 2018, Capella University’s average total enrollment increased 0.7% to 38,050 students compared to 37,783 students in accounting, human resources, legal, regulatory compliance, and other corporate functions, along with2017. New student enrollment for the occupancy and other related costs attributable to such functions.period increased 10.0%.

 

Investment income consists primarilyNon-Degree Programs Segment

·

DevMountain, LLC is a software development school offering affordable, high-quality, leading-edge software coding education at multiple campus locations and online.

·

Hackbright Academy, Inc. is a software engineering school for women. Its primary offering is an intensive 12-week accelerated software development program, together with placement services and coaching.

·

The New York Code and Design Academy, Inc. is a New York City-based provider of web and application software development courses.

·

Sophia Learning, LLC is an innovative learning company which leverages technology to support self-paced learning, including courses eligible for transfer into credit at over 2,000 colleges and universities.

We believe we have the right operating strategies in place to provide the most direct path between learning and employment for our students. We focus on innovation continually to differentiate ourselves in our markets and drive growth by supporting student success, producing affordable degrees, optimizing our comprehensive marketing strategy, serving a broader set of earningsour students’ professional needs, and realized gains or lossesestablishing new growth platforms. Technology and the talent of our faculty and employees enable these strategies. We believe these strategies and enablers will allow us to continue to deliver high quality, affordable education, resulting in continued growth over the long-term. We will continue to invest in these enablers to strengthen the foundation and future of our business. We also believe our

62


Table of Contents

enhanced scale and capabilities allow us to continue to focus on investments,innovative cost and interest expense consists of interest incurred onrevenue synergies, while improving the value provided to our outstanding borrowings, unused revolving credit facility fees, and amortization of deferred financing costs.students.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments related to its allowance for doubtful accounts; income tax provisions; the useful lives of property and equipment;equipment and intangible assets; redemption rates for scholarship programs;programs and valuation of contract liabilities; fair value of future contractual operating lease obligations for facilities that have been closed; valuation of deferred tax assets, goodwill, contingent consideration, and intangible assets; forfeiture rates and achievability of performance targets for stock-based compensation plans; and accrued expenses. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments regarding the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

56


Table of Contents

Management regularly reviews its estimates and judgments for reasonableness and may modify them in the future. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

Management believes that the following critical accounting policies are its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

 

Revenue recognition—  Like many traditional institutions, theStrayer University offers itsand Capella University offer educational programs primarily on a quarter system having four academic terms, which generally coincide with our quarterly financial reporting periods. NYCDA’s revenues are recognized as services are provided, generally ratably over the length of a course. Approximately 96% of our revenues during the year ended December  31, 20172018 consisted of tuition revenue. Capella University offers monthly start options for new students, who then transition to a quarterly schedule. Capella University also offers its FlexPath program, which allows students to determine their 12-week billing session schedule after they complete their first course. Tuition revenue for all students is recognized ratably over the course of instruction as the University providesUniversities and the schools offering non-degree programs provide academic services, in a given term, whether delivered in person at a physical campus or online. Tuition revenue is shown net of any refunds, withdrawals, corporate discounts, scholarships, and employee tuition discounts. The UniversityUniversities also derivesderive revenue from other sources such as textbook-related income, certificate revenue, certain academic fees, licensing revenue, and other income, which are all recognized when earned. Beginning January 1, 2018, in accordance with our adoption of new revenue recognition standards under ASC 606, materials provided to students in connection with their enrollment in a course are recognized as revenue when control of those materials transfers to the student. At the start of each academic term or program, a liability (deferred revenue)(contract liability) is recorded for academic services to be provided, and a tuition receivable is recorded for the portion of the tuition not paid in advance. Any cash received prior to the start of an academic term or program is recorded as deferred revenue.a contract liability.

 

Students of the UniversityUniversities finance their education in a variety of ways, and historically about three quarters of our students have participated in one or more financial aid programs provided through Title IV of the Higher Education Act. In addition, many of our working adult students finance their own education or receive full or partial tuition reimbursement from their employers. Those students who are veterans or active duty military personnel have access to various additional government-funded educational benefit programs.

 

A typical class is offered in weekly increments over a ten-weeksix- to twelve-week period, depending on the University and course type, and is followed by an exam. Students who withdraw from a course may be eligible for a refund of tuition charges based on the timing of the withdrawal. We use the student’s last date of attendance for this purpose. Student attendance is based on physical presence in class for on-ground classes. For online classes, attendance consists of logging into one’s course shell and performing an academically-related activity (e.g., engaging in a discussion post or taking a quiz).

 

63


Table of Contents

If a student withdraws from a course prior to completion, a portion of the tuition may be refundable depending on when the withdrawal occurs. Our specific refund policies vary across Universities and non-degree programs. For students attending Strayer University, our refund policy typically permits students who complete less than half of a course to receive a partial refund of tuition for that course. For learners attending Capella University, our refund policy varies based on course format. GuidedPath learners are allowed a 100% refund through the first five days of the course, a 75% refund from six to twelve days, and 0% refund for the remainder of the period. FlexPath learners receive a 100% refund through the 12th calendar day of the course for their first billing session only and a 0% refund after that date and for all subsequent billing sessions. Refunds reduce the tuition revenue that otherwise would have otherwise been recognized for that student. Since the University’sUniversities’ academic terms coincide with our financial reporting periods for most programs, nearly all refunds are processed and recorded in the same quarter as the corresponding revenue. For certain programs where courses may overlap a quarter-end date, the Company estimates a refund rate and does not recognize the related revenue until the uncertainty related to the refund is resolved. The portion of tuition revenue refundable to students may vary based on the student’s state of residence.

 

For undergraduate students who withdraw from all their courses during the quarter of instruction, we reassess collectibility of tuition and fees for revenue recognition purposes. In addition, we cease revenue recognition when a student fully withdraws from all of his or her courses in the academic term. Tuition charges billed in accordance with our billing schedule may be greater than the pro rata revenue amount, but the additional amounts are not recognized as revenue unless they are collected in cash.cash and the term is complete.

 

For students who receive funding under Title IV and withdraw, funds are subject to return provisions as defined by the Department of Education. The University is responsible for returning Title IV funds to the Department of Education and then may seek payment from the withdrawn student of prorated tuition or other amounts charged to him or her. Loss of financial aid eligibility during an academic term is rare and would normally coincide with the student’s withdrawal from the institution. As discussed above, we cease revenue recognition upon a student’s withdrawal from all of his or her classes in an academic term.term until cash is received and the term is complete.

 

New students at Strayer University registering in credit-bearing courses in any undergraduate program for the summer 2013 term (fiscal third quarter) and subsequent terms qualify for the Graduation Fund, whereby qualifying students earn tuition credits that are redeemable in the final year of a student’s course of study if he or she successfully remains in the program. Students must meet all of the University’s admission requirements and not be eligible for any previously offered scholarship

57


Table of Contents

program. Our employees and their dependents are not eligible for the program. To maintain eligibility, students must be enrolled in a bachelor’s degree program. Students who have more than one consecutive term of non-attendance lose any Graduation Fund credits earned to date, but may earn and accumulate new credits if the student is reinstated or readmitted by the University in the future. In their final academic year, qualifying students will receive one free course for every three courses that were successfully completed. Revenue and the value of the benefit earned by students participatingcompleted in prior years. The performance obligation associated with free courses that may be redeemed in the Graduation Fundfuture is recognizedvalued based on a systematic and rational allocation of the cost of honoring the benefit earned to each of the underlying revenue transactions that result in progress by the student toward earning the benefit. The estimated value of awards under the Graduation Fund that will be recognized in the future is based on historical experience of students’ persistence in completing their course of study and earning a degree.degree and the tuition rate in effect at the time it was associated with the transaction. Estimated redemption rates of eligible students vary based on their term of enrollment. As of December  31, 2017,2018, we had deferred $37.4$43.3 million for estimated redemptions earned under the Graduation Fund, as compared to $29.5$37.4 million at December 31, 2016.2017. Each quarter, we assess our methodologies and assumptions underlying our estimates for persistence and estimated redemptions based on actual experience. To date, any adjustments to our estimates have not been material. However, if actual persistence or redemption rates change, adjustments to the reserve may be necessary and could be material.

 

Tuition receivable  — We record estimates for our allowance for doubtful accounts for tuition receivable from students primarily based on our historical collection rates by group of receivable reflecting factors such as age of receivable,the balance due,  student academic status, and size of outstanding balances, net of recoveries, and consideration of other relevant factors. Our experience is that payment of outstanding balances is influenced by whether the student returns to the institution, as we require students to make payment arrangements for their outstanding balances prior to enrollment. Therefore, we monitor outstanding tuition receivable balances through subsequent terms, increasing the reserve on such

64


Table of Contents

balances over time as the likelihood of returning to the institution diminishes and our historical experience indicates collection is less likely. We periodically assess our methodologies for estimating bad debts in consideration of actual experience. If the financial condition of our students were to deteriorate, resulting in evidence of impairment of their ability to make required payments for tuition payable to us, additional allowances or write-offs may be required. During 20162017 and 2017,2018, our bad debt expense was 3.7%4.8% and 4.8%5.9% of revenue, respectively. Our bad debt in 2017 washas been negatively impacted by changes madethe continued shift in student mix to less experienced undergraduate students, as well as by delays in the processing of Title IV financial aid. During 2018, we adjusted our allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect the slower collection of receivables associated with these delays. We believe the financial aid processing delays are a short-term condition and were largely resolved by the U.S.  Departmentend of Education in the way it processes student financial aid, which increased the number of students subject2018, but may continue to verification for loan eligibility under Title IV. This increase was not unique to Strayer, and affected many other institutions which receive funding through Title IV programs. The increased volume resulted in delays in processing financial aid for these students, largely causing the deterioration inimpact our bad debt rate in 2017 compared to 2016. The Department of Education announced certain corrections to its processes which are scheduled to take effect in 2018 and are expected to reduce the volume of accounts selected for verification and improve the timeliness of the reviews.2019. A change in our allowance for doubtful accounts of 1% of gross tuition receivable as of December  31, 20172018 would have changed our income from operations by approximately $0.4$0.8 million.

 

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets  Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the amount assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Indefinite-livedIndefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names, are recorded at fair market value on their acquisition date. Goodwill and the indefinite-livedindefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed at least annually for impairment. In connection withThrough our acquisition of CEC in the third quarter of 2018, we had significant additions to goodwill in our JWMIand tradename intangible assets. The acquired goodwill was allocated to the Strayer University and Capella University reporting unitunits. Refer to Note 9 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets – within the indefinite-lived intangible asset associated withfootnotes to the JWMI tradename, we utilized a qualitative assessment, consistent with ASC 350, to evaluate the recoverability of the related amounts. A qualitative assessment was performed based on the excess fair value noted in prior years. The qualitative factors considered included macroeconomic conditions, industry/market factors, cost considerations, and overallconsolidated financial performance, among others. Based on our qualitative assessment, we concluded that it was not more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value; as such, no impairments had been incurred.statements for additional information.

 

We made investments in NYCDA since its acquisition to position it for scalable growth. Although the acquisition has had a positive impact on our revenue growth, NYCDA has not achieved the degree of revenue growth initially anticipated or met operating performance expectations. In connection with the goodwill in our NYCDA reporting unit and the indefinite-livedindefinite-lived intangible asset associated with the NYCDA tradename, we utilizedperformed a quantitative impairment assessment consistent with ASC 350. The valuation350 during the three months ended June 30, 2018. Following the merger with CEC, we commenced a process to rationalize and align all of our software application development operations and brands under one leadership team. As a result of this process, we performed additional quantitative impairment assessments of the reporting unit considered bothNYCDA goodwill and trade name. Based on these analyses following the shift in the business model after the CEC merger, during the year ended December 31, 2018, we decided to stop teaching on-ground courses in early 2019, and fully impaired the goodwill and intangible asset balances related to NYCDA, resulting in total impairment charges of $19.6 million. Refer to Note 9 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets – within the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges recorded. 

Finite-lived intangible assets that are acquired in business combinations are recorded at fair value on their acquisition dates and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Finite-lived intangible assets consist of student relationships.

We review our finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an income approach andasset may not be recoverable. If such assets are not recoverable, a market approach, whereaspotential impairment loss is recognized to the tradename valuation utilized a relief from royalty method. Theextent the carrying amount of the NYCDA reporting unit was $20.5 million atassets exceeds the fair value of the assets. No impairment charges related to finite-lived intangible assets were recorded during the years ended December  31, 2017. We updated our revenue and cash flow forecasts in the fourth quarter to determine fair values and concluded no impairment charge was required. Key assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow and relief from royalty models include revenue growth rates ranging from 5% to 129% through 2024 and 3% thereafter, operating margins ranging from

58


Table of Contents

-15% to 20% during the same period, and a discount rate of 17.5%. The NYCDA business is still in its early stages and, as such, future operating performance is uncertain. Although we remain committed to this business and are optimistic about its future prospects, the rate of growth in the business has been slower than originally anticipated. Management will continue to monitor the business and update the operating plan, as necessary. Further downward adjustments to the plan could result in impairments in future periods, which could be material.2017 or 2018.

 

Contingent Consideration — In connection with theits acquisition of NYCDA, the Company agreed that the purchase price would include contingent cash payments (contingent consideration) of up to $12.5 million payable based on NYCDA’s results of operations over a five-year period (the “Earnout”). Generally accepted accounting principles require that contingent consideration be recorded at its estimated fair value at the date of acquisition and then adjusted to fair value each period thereafter until it is settled.

 

The fair value of the Earnout was originally measured by applying a probability weighted discounted cash flow model based on significant inputs not observable in the market. Based on its original projections, the Company expected the full amount of the Earnout would be paid and initially measured the liability at $9.0 million. Following its initial recognition, the Company reassessesreassessed and adjustsadjusted the carrying value of the Earnout to fair value with fair value reflectingbased on revisions to the business plan, expectations relative to achieving the performance targets over the earnoutEarnout period, and the impact of the discount rate. During the fourth quarter of 2016 and 2017, the Company revised its near-term revenue projections and assumptions of the

65


Table of Contents

timing of future cash flows for NYCDA and accordingly recorded an adjustmentadjustments to reduce the fair value of contingent consideration by $1.3 million. During 2017, the Company continued to update its near-term revenue projections for NYCDA.million and $7.8 million, respectively.  As of December 31, 2017,2018, the Company estimates that no amounts under the Earnout will be paid and the related liability has been recorded atbalance is zero. The fair value adjustments to the Earnout in 2017 aggregated $7.8 million. The Company will continue to update it forecasts each period and record any fair value adjustments, as necessary.

 

Accrued lease and related costs — We estimate potential sublease income and vacancy periods for space that is not in use, adjusting our estimates when circumstances change. If our estimates change, or if we enter into subleases at rates that are substantially different than our current estimates, we will adjust our liability for lease and related costs. In 2016, we reduced our liability for leases by approximately $1.9 million,both 2017 and in 2017,2018, we  increased our liability for leases by approximately $0.3 million.

 

Other estimates — We record estimates for contingent consideration, certain of our accrued expenses, and income tax liabilities. We estimate the useful lives of our property and equipment and intangible assets and periodically review our assumed forfeiture rates and ability to achieve performance targets for stock-based awards and adjust them as necessary. Should actual results differ from our estimates, revisions to our contingent consideration, accrued expenses, carrying amount of goodwill and intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense, and income tax liabilities may be required.

 

Results of Operations

 

As discussed above, we completed our merger with CEC on August 1, 2018. Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 include the results of CEC from the merger date. Periods prior to the merger date do not include the financial results of CEC prior to the merger date. Accordingly, the financial results of each period presented are not directly comparable. This discussion will highlight changes largely in the Strayer University segment, as those results are included in full in each period.

In 2017, our revenues increased 3%2018, we generated $634.2 million in revenue compared to $454.9 million compared to 2016, principally due to a 6% increase in average enrollment, partially offset by a 3% decline in average revenue per student. Income2017. Our loss from operations was $22.7 million in 2018 compared to income from operations of $52.2 million in 2017, compareddue to $57.5merger costs of $45.7 milliom, amortization expense of $25.7 million associated with intangible assets acquired in 2016. Net incomethe merger with CEC, and a $19.6 million impairment charge related to goodwill and intangible assets carried by NYCDA. Our net loss in 20172018 was $20.6$15.7 million compared to $34.8 million for the same period in 2016. Diluted earningsand our loss per share for 2017 was $1.84 compared to $3.21 in 2016.$1.03. 

 

In the accompanying analysis of financial information for 20172018 and 2016,2017, we use acertain financial measure,measures including Adjusted Income from Operations, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share that isare not required by or prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Adjusted Net Income,These measures, which isare considered a “non-GAAP financial measure”measures” under SEC rules, isare defined by us as Net Income excluding fair value adjustments related to our acquisition ofexclude the New York Code and Design Academy and the related tax effects and adjustments to our reserve for leases on facilities no longer in use, charges associated with our previously announced merger with Capella Education Company and severance charges associated with a staff reduction program, and adjustments to the provision for income taxes which include a reduction in the value of our deferred tax asset as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. following:

·

a purchase accounting adjustment to record Capella University contract liabilities at fair value as a result of the Company's merger with Capella Education Company,

·

amortization expense related to assets acquired through the Company’s merger with Capella Education Company,

·

transaction and integration costs associated with the Company’s merger with Capella Education Company,

·

fair value adjustments to the value of contingent consideration, impairment charges for intangible assets related to the Company's acquisition of The New York Code + Design Academy, and adjustments to reserves for leases on facilities no longer in use, and

·

tax adjustments utilizing an adjusted annual effective tax rate of 25.6%, 38.8%, and 40.2% for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respecfively.

When considered together with GAAP financial results, we believe Adjusted Net Income providesthese measures provide management and investors with an additional understanding of itsour business and operating results, including underlying trends.trends associated with the Company’s ongoing operations.

 

5966


 

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP financial measures are not defined in the same manner by all companies and may not be comparable withto other similarly titled measures of other companies. Non-GAAP financial measures may be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, GAAP results. A reconciliation of Net incomethese measures to Adjusted Net Income, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure,measures is provided below.

 

Excluding these adjustments, ourAdjusted income from operations was $97.4 million in 2018 compared to $56.6 million in 2017 compared to $54.3 million in 2016.2017. Adjusted net income was $75.1 million in 2018 compared to $34.9 million in 2017, compared to $32.3 million in 2016, and adjusted diluted earnings per share was $4.75 in 2018 compared to $3.11 in 2017 compared2017.

Reconciliation of Reported to $2.98 in 2016. The tables below reconcile our reported resultsAdjusted Results of operations to adjusted results.Operations for the year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

    

As Reported (GAAP)

    

Contract Liability Adjustment(1)

 

Amortization of Acquired Assets(2)

 

Merger Costs(3)

 

Fair Value Adjustments and Impairment of Intangible Assets(4)

 

Tax Adjustments(5)

 

As Adjusted (Non-GAAP)

    

Income (loss) from operations

 

$

(22,740)

 

$

28,748

 

$

25,694

 

$

45,745

 

$

19,909

 

$

 —

 

$

97,356

 

Other income, net

 

 

3,601

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,601

 

    Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

(19,139)

 

 

28,748

 

 

25,694

 

 

45,745

 

 

19,909

 

 

 —

 

 

100,957

 

    Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

(3,468)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

29,348

 

 

25,880

 

         Net income (loss)

 

$

(15,671)

 

$

28,748

 

$

25,694

 

$

45,745

 

$

19,909

 

$

(29,348)

 

$

75,077

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(1.03)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4.94

 

Diluted

 

$

(1.03)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4.75

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

15,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,190

 

Diluted

 

 

15,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,801

 

6067


 

Table of Contents

Reconciliation of Reported to Adjusted Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

    

As Reported (GAAP)

    

Fair Value Adjustments (1)

 

Merger Costs (2)

 

Deferred Tax Asset (3)

 

As Adjusted (Non-GAAP)

    

Income from operations

 

$

52,209

 

$

(7,512)

 

$

11,879

 

$

 —

 

$

56,576

 

Investment income

 

 

1,079

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,079

 

Interest expense

 

 

642

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

642

 

    Income before income taxes

 

 

52,646

 

 

(7,512)

 

 

11,879

 

 

 —

 

 

57,013

 

    Provision for income taxes

 

 

32,034

 

 

(82)

 

 

1,565

 

 

(11,375)

 

 

22,142

 

         Net income

 

$

20,612

 

$

(7,430)

 

$

10,314

 

$

11,375

 

$

34,871

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic **

 

$

1.93

 

$

(0.70)

 

$

0.97

 

$

1.07

 

$

3.27

 

Diluted **

 

$

1.84

 

$

(0.66)

 

$

0.92

 

$

1.02

 

$

3.11

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

10,678

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,678

 

Diluted

 

 

11,199

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

    

As Reported (GAAP)

    

Contract Liability Adjustment(1)

 

Amortization of Acquired Assets(2)

 

Merger Costs(3)

 

Fair Value Adjustments and Impairment of Intangible Assets(4)

 

Tax Adjustments(5)

 

As Adjusted (Non-GAAP)

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

$

52,209

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

11,879

 

$

(7,512)

 

$

 —

 

$

56,576

 

Other income, net

 

 

437

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

437

 

    Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

52,646

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,879

 

 

(7,512)

 

 

 —

 

 

57,013

 

    Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

32,034

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(9,892)

 

 

22,142

 

         Net income (loss)

 

$

20,612

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

11,879

 

$

(7,512)

 

$

9,892

 

$

34,871

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3.27

 

Diluted

 

$

1.84

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3.11

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

10,678

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,678

 

Diluted

 

 

11,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,199

 

 

Reconciliation of Reported to Adjusted Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

    

As Reported (GAAP)

    

Fair Value Adjustments (1)

 

Merger Costs (2)

 

Deferred Tax Asset (3)

 

As Adjusted (Non-GAAP)

 

Income from operations

 

$

57,472

 

$

(3,213)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

54,259

 

Investment income

 

 

462

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

462

 

Interest expense

 

 

642

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

642

 

    Income before income taxes

 

 

57,292

 

 

(3,213)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

54,079

 

    Provision for income taxes

 

 

22,490

 

 

(748)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

21,742

 

         Net income

 

$

34,802

 

$

(2,465)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

32,337

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic **

 

$

3.28

 

$

(0.23)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3.05

 

Diluted **

 

$

3.21

 

$

(0.23)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

2.98

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

10,610

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,610

 

Diluted

 

 

10,845

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,845

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP Adjustment

 

 

 

 

    

As Reported (GAAP)

    

Contract Liability Adjustment(1)

 

Amortization of Acquired Assets(2)

 

Merger Costs(3)

 

Fair Value Adjustments and Impairment of Intangible Assets(4)

 

Tax Adjustments(5)

 

As Adjusted (Non-GAAP)

Income (loss) from operations

 

$

57,472

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

(3,213)

 

$

 —

 

$

54,259

Other (expense) income, net

 

 

(180)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(180)

    Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

57,292

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,213)

 

 

 —

 

 

54,079

    Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

22,490

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(748)

 

 

21,742

         Net income (loss)

 

$

34,802

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

(3,213)

 

$

748

 

$

32,337

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

3.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3.05

Diluted

 

$

3.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.98

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

10,610

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,610

Diluted

 

 

10,845

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,845


**Earnings per share data may not foot due to rounding

68


 

Table of Contents

(1)

Reflects reductionsa purchase accounting adjustment to record Capella University contract liabiliteies at fair value as a result of the Company’s merger with CEC.

(2)

Reflects amortization expense related to intangible assets associated with the Company’s merger with CEC.

(3)

Reflects transaction and integration charges associated with the Company's merger with CEC.

(4)

Reflects adjustments to the value of contingent consideration in 2016 and 2017, and an impairment of intangible assets in 2018, related to the Company’sCompany's acquisition of the New York Code and Design Academy and the related tax effects, and adjustments to the Company’s reserve for leases on facilities no longer in use.Academy.

(2)(5)

Reflects charges associated with the Company’s previously announced merger with Capella Education Companytax adjustments utilizing an adjusted annual effective tax rate of 25.6%, 38.8% and severance costs associated with a staff reduction program.

(3)

Reflects a reduction in the value of the Company’s net deferred tax assets in connection with the passage of the Tax Cuts40.2% for 2018, 2017 and Jobs Act of 2017.2016, respectively.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared To Year Ended December 31, 2017

Revenues. The increase in consolidated revenues compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily related to the inclusion of CEC revenue since the August 1, 2018 acquisition date. In the Strayer University segment for the year ended December 31, 2018, enrollment grew 8.1% to 47,733 from 44,155 in the prior year. Revenue grew 4.8% to $471.1 million compared to $449.5 million in 2017 as a result of the increase in enrollment, partially offset by lower revenue per student. Capella University segment revenue was $154.9 million, which included a $28.7 million purchase accounting reduction related to contract liabilities acquired in the merger. Non-Degree Programs segment revenues were $8.2 million in 2018, compared to $5.3 million in 2017. The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to incremental revenues generated from the operations of Hackbright and DevMountain, which were acquired in the CEC merger during the third quarter of 2018.

Instruction and educational support expenses.Consolidated instruction and educational support expenses increased to $340.1 million in 2018, compared to $249.9 million in 2017, principally due to the inclusion of instructional and education support expenses of CEC, as well as increases in Strayer student materials costs, depreciation expense following recent infrastructure investments, and bad debt expense. Consolidated instruction and educational support expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 53.6% in 2018 from 54.9% in 2017. 

Marketing expenses.Consolidated marketing expenses increased to $137.0 million in 2018, from $82.5 million in 2017, principally due to the inclusion of CEC costs, as well as increased investments in branding initiatives and partnerships with brand ambassadors for Strayer. Consolidated marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 21.6% in 2018 from 18.1% in 2017. 

Admissions advisory expenses.  Consolidated admissions advisory expenses increased to $31.5 million in 2018, from $19.0 million in 2017 with the inclusion of costs following the merger with CEC. Consolidated admissions advisory expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 5.0% in 2018 from 4.2% in 2017.

General and administration expenses.Consolidated general and administration expenses increased to $57.1 million in 2018 compared to $46.8 million in 2017 with the inclusion of costs following the merger with CEC. Consolidated general and administration expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 9.0% in 2018 from 10.3% in 2017. The decrease as a percent of revenue is due primarily to staff reductions following the merger, and lower costs for professional fees.

Amortization of intangible assets. In 2018, we recorded $25.7 million in amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired in the merger with CEC.

Merger costs. Merger costs were $45.7 million in 2018 compared to $11.9 million in 2017, and reflect expenses for legal, accounting, integration support services, and severance costs incurred in connection with the merger with CEC.

Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets. In 2018, we recorded a goodwill impairment loss of $13.9 million and an intangible asset impairment loss of $5.7 million based on analyses performed during the year with respect to our acquisition of NYCDA. Refer to Note 9 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets of the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of these impairment charges. In addition, we recognized a $0.3 million charge to increase our liability for leases on facilities no longer in use in 2018. In 2017, we recorded a benefit of $7.8 million to reduce the value of contingent consideration payable to the sellers of NYCDA, offset by a charge of $0.3 million to increase our liability for leases on facilities no longer in use.

6169


 

Table of Contents

Enrollment TrendsIncome (loss) from operations. Loss from operations was $22.7 million in 2018 compared to income from operations of $52.2 million in 2017. The decline was primarily due to amortization expense, merger costs, and impairments to the NYCDA trade name and goodwill incurred during the year and discussed above.

 

Key enrollment trends by quarter for our total population of students were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

total

 

% Change in

 

Academic Term

    

2016

    

2017

    

students

    

new students

 

Winter

 

40,872

 

43,387

 

6%

 

8%

 

Spring

 

41,029

 

43,411

 

6%

 

8%

 

Summer

 

38,813

 

41,679

 

7%

 

7%

 

Fall

 

45,509

 

48,144

 

6%

 

4%

 

Average

 

41,556

 

44,155

 

6%

 

6%

 

Since 2013, we have introduced a number of initiativesOther income. Other income increased to $3.6 million in response2018 compared to the variability in demand for our programs. Recognizing that affordability is an important factor in a prospective student’s decision to seek a college degree, we reduced Strayer University undergraduate tuition for new students by 20% beginning in our 2014 winter academic term. We also introduced the Graduation Fund in mid-2013, whereby qualifying students can receive one free course for every three courses successfully completed. The free courses are redeemable in the student’s final academic year. In 2015, we increased our investment in resources focused on helping Fortune 1000 companies to structure customized education and training programs for their employees, often with significant discounts to our published tuition rates. In 2017, we introduced several new scholarship programs aimed at specific demographics, geographies, and student profiles. We also began testing significantly reduced tuition for select graduate degree programs. These initiatives have had a negative impact on Strayer University revenue per student, which declined 3%$0.4 million in 2017, and is expected to decrease in 2018 by approximately 3%, not including any impact from our pending merger with Capella.

Asas a result of higher yields on money markets and marketable securities and an increase in our cash balance. Other income is net of interest expense, which was $0.7 million and $0.6 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively. We had $250.0 million available under our amended revolving credit facility and no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2018.

(Benefit) provision for income taxes. We recorded a benefit for income taxes of $3.5 million in 2018, compared to a provision for income taxes of $32.0 million in 2017. Our effective tax rate for 2018 was 18.1%. The benefit for income taxes in 2018 reflects the lower federal income tax rate in effect in 2018, accelerated deductions enabled by the 2017 tax law, and the tax benefits associated with the vesting of restricted stock, offset by certain nondeductible charges associated with the merger and for the impairment of NYCDA goodwill. Our effective tax rate, excluding these and other initiatives, average total enrollment grew approximately 6% in 2017. Should the 2017 full-year enrollment growth continuediscrete tax adjustments, is 25.6% for 2018.

Net income (loss). Net loss was $15.7 million in 2018 we would expect revenue forcompared to net income of $20.6 million in 2017 due to the full year 2018 to increase at a rate slightly less than enrollment growth and would expect operating expenses in 2018 to increase slightly, not including any impact from our pending merger with Capella.factors discussed above.

The following table sets forth certain income statement data as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

    

2015

 

    

2016

 

    

2017

 

 

Revenues

 

100.0

%

 

100.0

%

 

100.0

%

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instruction and educational support

 

53.9

 

 

54.6

 

 

53.9

 

 

Marketing

 

16.1

 

 

17.9

 

 

18.1

 

 

Admissions advisory

 

3.8

 

 

4.1

 

 

4.3

 

 

General and administration

 

10.2

 

 

10.4

 

 

12.2

 

 

Total costs and expenses

 

84.0

 

 

87.0

 

 

88.5

 

 

Income from operations

 

16.0

 

 

13.0

 

 

11.5

 

 

Investment income

 

0.1

 

 

0.1

 

 

0.2

 

 

Interest expense

 

0.9

 

 

0.1

 

 

0.1

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

15.2

 

 

13.0

 

 

11.6

 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

6.0

 

 

5.1

 

 

7.0

 

 

Net income

 

9.2

%

 

7.9

%

 

4.6

%

 

Effective tax rate

 

39.5

%

 

39.3

%

 

60.8

%

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared To Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

Enrollment.Revenues. Revenues increased to $454.9 million in 2017, from $441.1 million in 2016, primarily due to the increase in enrollment, partially offset by a decline in revenue per student of 3%. Average total enrollment increased to 44,155 students for the year ended December 31, 2017 from 41,556 students for the same period in 2016.

62


Table of Contents

Revenues. Revenues increased 3% to $454.9 million in 2017 from $441.1 million in 2016, principally due to the increase in enrollment, partially offset by a decline in revenue per student of 3%. The decline in revenue per student is largely attributable to new scholarship programs for new undergraduate students and a reduced pricing structure implemented for the first quarter of 2014, which reduced tuition for new undergraduate students by approximately 20%, and gave eligible students access to the Graduation Fund. Revenues for undergraduate students increased 8% in 2017, driven by an increase in enrollment of 12% partially offset by a 3% decline in revenue per student, resulting primarily from the new scholarship programs for new undergraduate students. For graduate students, revenues decreased 7% in 2017 as a result of a 7% decline in enrollment.

 

Instruction and educational support expenses. Instruction and educational support expenses increased $4.2 million, or 2%, to $245.2$249.9 million in 2017, from $241.0$242.1 million in 2016, in part due to increased student support costs and bad debt expense. Instruction and educational support expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 53.9% for 2017 from 54.6%was 54.9% in 2016. We recorded adjustments of $4.8 million and $1.1 million inboth 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to changes in fair value of our lease portfolio and NYCDA contingent consideration, and certain personnel costs associated with a one-time staff reduction program implemented in the third quarter of 2017. We may record additional adjustments in the future.2016.

 

Marketing expenses. Marketing expenses increased $3.6 million, or 5%, to $82.6$82.5 million in 2017, from $79.0 million in 2016. Marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 18.1% in 2017 from 17.9% in 2016.

 

Admissions advisory expenses. Admissions advisory expenses increased by $1.7 million, or 9%, to $19.5$19.0 million in 2017, from $17.8 million in 2016. Admissions advisory expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 4.3%4.2% for 2017 from 4.1%4.0% in 2016.

 

General and administration expenses. General and administration expenses increased $9.7 million, or 21%, to $55.4$46.8 million in 2017, from $45.7$47.9 million in 2016. General and administration expenses as a percentage of revenues increaseddecreased to 12.2%10.3% for 2017 from 10.4%10.9% in 2016. The increase

Merger costs. Merger costs were $11.9 million in general2017 and administrativereflect expenses for legal, accounting and other due diligence costs was primarily due to approximately $8.4 million of costs associatedincurred in connection with our pendingthe merger with Capella. We expect to incur additionalCEC. No merger costs as the merger is expected to become effectivewere incurred in the third quarter of 2018.2016.

 

Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets. In 2017 and 2016, we recorded a benefit of $7.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, to reduce the value of contingent consideration payable to the sellers of NYCDA. In 2017 and 2016, we recognized a $0.3 million charge and a $1.9 million benefit, respectively, to adjust our liability for leases on facilities no longer in use. 

70


Table of Contents

Income from operations. Income from operations decreased $5.3 million, or 9%, to $52.2 million in 2017, from $57.5 million in 2016.2016, primarily due to merger costs associated with the CEC merger, offset by the fair value adjustments discussed above.

 

Interest expense.Other income (expense). InterestOther income was $0.4 million in 2017 compared to other expense wasof $0.2 million in 2016. Other income is net of interest expense of $0.6 million in both 2017 and 2016. We havehad $150.0 million available under our revolving credit facility and no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2017.

 

Provision for income taxes. Income tax expense increased $9.5 million to $32.0 million in 2017 from $22.5 million in 2016, primarily due to a one-time charge of $11.4 million to reduce the value of our deferred tax asset as a result of the reduction in the corporate federal income tax rate as a resultfollowing the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Our effective tax rate was 60.8% for 2017 and 39.3% for 2016. Excluding the effect of the change in the federal tax rate, our effective tax rate was 38.8% for 2017.  We expect our effective tax rate for 2018 to be approximately 27-28%.

 

Net income. Net income decreased $14.2 million to $20.6 million in 2017 from $34.8 million in 2016 due to the factors discussed above.

 

Year EndedLiquidity and Capital Resources

On August 1, 2018, we completed our acquisition of CEC pursuant to a merger agreement dated October 29, 2017. Cash acquired in the CEC merger was $167.9 million. At December 31, 2016 Compared To Year Ended2018, we had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $386.5 million compared to $155.9 million at December 31, 20152017. Most of our cash was held in demand deposit accounts at high credit quality financial institutions.

 

Enrollment. AverageOn August 1, 2018, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement and Amendment to Other Loan Documents (the “Second Amendment), which Second Amendment amends the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2012 (as amended by the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2015, the “Prior Credit Facility”, and the Prior Credit Facility as amended by the Second Amendment, the “Amended Credit Facility”), among the Company, certain of its subsidiaries party thereto as subsidiary guarantors, SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”), and the other lenders party thereto. The Second Amendment amended the Prior Credit Facility to extend the maturity date of the Company’s revolving credit facility from July 2, 2020 to August 1, 2023, and to increase total enrollment increasedcommitments under the revolving credit facility from $150 million to 41,556 students$250 million, with an option, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and satisfaction of certain conditions, to increase the commitments under the revolving facility or establish one or more incremental term loans (each, an “Incremental Facility”) in an aggregate amount of up to the sum of (x) $150 million and (y) if such Incremental Facility is incurred in connection with a permitted acquisition, any amount so long as the Company’s leverage ratio (calculated on a trailing four-quarter basis) on a pro forma basis will be no greater than 1.75:1.00. Borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR or a base rate, plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.00%, depending on our leverage ratio. An unused commitment fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.30%, depending on our leverage ratio, accrues on unused amounts under the Amended Credit Facility. During each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we paid unused commitment fees of $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, under the Amended Credit Facility and the Prior Credit Facility. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants related to the Amended Credit Facility as of December 31, 2018. We had no borrowings outstanding under the Prior Credit Facility or the Amended Credit Facility during each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Our net cash from operating activities decreased in 2018 to $46.9 million, as compared to $56.2 million for the same period in 2017. The decrease in net cash from operating activities was largely due to costs associated with the CEC merger, and the decline in net income.

Capital expenditures were $27.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 40,450 students2018, compared to $18.1 million for 2017. Capital expenditures for the same period in 2015.year ending December 31, 2019 are expected to be between  4%-5% of revenue.

 

Revenues. Revenues increased 2% to $441.1 millionThe Board of Directors approved a quarterly dividend payment of $0.25 per common share in 2016 from $434.4 million in 2015, principally due to the increase in enrollment, partially offset by a decline in revenue per student of 1%. The decline in revenue per student is largely attributable to a reduced pricing structure implemented for the first quarterand second quarters of 2014, which reduced tuition for new undergraduate students by approximately 20%,2018 and gave eligible students access toa quarterly dividend payment of $0.50 per common share in the Graduation Fund. Revenuesthird and fourth quarters of 2018.

6371


 

Table of Contents

for undergraduate students increased 4% in 2016, driven by an increase in enrollment of 7% partially offset by a 2% decline in revenue per student, resulting primarily from the reduced pricing structure for new undergraduate students. For graduate students, revenues decreased 4% in 2016, driven by a 6% decline in enrollment, partially offset by a 2% increase in revenue per student. The increase in graduate revenue per student was due primarily to a tuition increase that commenced for the winter term 2016, and increased classes per student compared to 2015.

Instruction and educational support expenses. Instruction and educational support expenses increased $6.9 million, or 3%, to $241.0 million in 2016 from $234.1 million in 2015. Instruction and educational support expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 54.6% for 2016 from 53.9% in 2015. We recorded $1.1 million and $0.4 million in adjustments in 2016 and 2015, respectively, resulting from changes in fair value related to our restructuring from 2013 and our acquisition of NYCDA. We may record additional adjustments in the future.

Marketing expenses. Marketing expenses increased $8.9 million, or 13%, to $79.0 million in 2016 from $70.1 million in 2015. Marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 17.9% in 2016 from 16.1% in 2015.

Admissions advisory expenses. Admissions advisory expenses increased by $1.5 million, or 9%, to $17.8 million in 2016 from $16.3 million in 2015, primarily as a result of higher personnel costs. Admissions advisory expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 4.1% for 2016 from 3.8% in 2015.

General and administration expenses. General and administration expenses increased $1.4 million, or 3%, to $45.7 million in 2016 from $44.3 million in 2015. General and administration expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 10.4% for 2016 from 10.2% in 2015.

Income from operations. Income from operations decreased $12.2 million, or 18%, to $57.5 million in 2016 from $69.7 million in 2015.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased to $0.6 million in 2016 from $3.9 million in 2015 following the repayment in July 2015 of all our outstanding debt in connection with our amended credit facility. We have $150.0 million available under our revolving credit facility and no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2016.

Provision for income taxes. Income tax expense decreased $3.6 million, or 14%, to $22.5 million in 2016 from $26.1 million in 2015, primarily due to the decrease in income before income taxes attributable to the factors discussed above. Our effective tax rate was 39.3% for 2016 and 39.5% for 2015.

Net income. Net income decreased $5.2 million to $34.8 million in 2016 from $40.0 million in 2015 due to the factors discussed above.

Seasonality

Our quarterly results of operations tend to vary significantly within a year because of student enrollment patterns. Enrollment is generally lowest in the third quarter, or summer term. The following table sets forth our total enrollment by term for 2015, 2016, and 2017:

Enrollment by Term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term

   

2015

   

2016

   

2017

 

Winter

 

40,728

 

40,872

 

43,387

 

Spring

 

40,875

 

41,029

 

43,411

 

Summer

 

37,221

 

38,813

 

41,679

 

Fall

 

42,975

 

45,509

 

48,144

 

Average

 

40,450

 

41,556

 

44,155

 

64


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our revenues on a quarterly basis for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017:

Quarterly Revenues
(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

Three Months Ended

    

Amount

    

Percent

 

    

Amount

    

Percent

 

    

Amount

    

Percent

 

 

March 31

 

$

111,885

 

26

%

 

$

111,166

 

25

%

 

$

114,912

 

25

%

 

June 30

 

 

109,750

 

25

 

 

 

108,487

 

25

 

 

 

112,720

 

25

 

 

September 30

 

 

99,142

 

23

 

 

 

102,156

 

23

 

 

 

108,512

 

24

 

 

December 31

 

 

113,660

 

26

 

 

 

119,279

 

27

 

 

 

118,707

 

26

 

 

Total for year

 

$

434,437

 

100

%

 

$

441,088

 

100

%

 

$

454,851

 

100

%

 

Costs generally are not affected by the seasonal factors as much as enrollment and revenue, and excluding one-time items, do not vary significantly on a quarterly basis.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $155.9 million compared to $129.2 million at December 31, 2016.  Most of our cash is held in demand deposit accounts at high credit quality financial institutions.

We are party to a credit agreement which provides for a $150 million revolving credit facility and an option to increase the commitments or establish incremental term loans under certain conditions. The credit agreement has a maturity date of July 2, 2020. We had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility during each of the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, and as of December 31, 2017.

Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at a per annum rate equal to, at our election, LIBOR or a base rate, plus a margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on our leverage ratio. An unused commitment fee ranging from 0.25% to 0.35% per annum, depending on our leverage ratio, accrues on unused amounts under the revolving credit facility. During each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we paid unused commitment fees of $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. We were in compliance with all applicable covenants related to the credit agreement as of December 31, 2017.

Our net cash from operating activities increased in 2017 to $56.2 million, as compared to $44.5 million for the same period in 2016. The increase in net cash from operating activities was largely due to the payment in 2016 of retention agreements in connection with the NYCDA acquisition, cash provided by changes in working capital, and the timing of income tax payments in 2017 compared to 2016. In 2017, bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue was 4.8% compared to 3.7% for 2016.

Capital expenditures were $18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $13.2 million for 2016. Capital expenditures for the year ending December 31, 2018 are expected to be between 4%-4.5% of revenue.

The Board of Directors declared an annual dividend of $1.00 per common share, payable quarterly. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, we paid a total of $11.4$27.8 million in cash dividends on our common stock. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, we did not repurchase any shares of common stock and, at December 31, 2017,2018, had $70 million in repurchase authorization to use through December 31, 2018.2019.

 

We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operating activities, and if necessary, cash borrowed under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our requirements for at least the next 12 months. Currently, we maintain our cash primarily in mostly demand deposit bank accounts and money market funds, which isare included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 20162017 and 2017.2018. We also hold marketable securities, which primarily include tax-exempt municipal securities and corporate debt securities. We earned interest income of $0.3 million, $0.5 million, $1.1 million, and $1.1$4.3 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2017,2018, respectively.

65


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

 

The table below sets forth our contractual commitments associated with operating leases, excluding subleases as of December 31, 2017:2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due By Period

 

 

    

 

    

Less than 1

    

1-3

    

3-5

    

More than

 

 

 

Total

 

Year

 

 Years

 

Years

 

5 Years

 

Operating leases

 

$

114,641

 

$

31,522

 

$

48,745

 

$

24,116

 

$

10,258

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due By Period

 

 

    

 

    

Less than 1

    

1-3

    

3-5

    

More than

 

 

 

Total

 

Year

 

 Years

 

Years

 

5 Years

 

Operating leases

 

$

142,315

 

$

33,600

 

$

51,884

 

$

24,086

 

$

32,745

 

 

ImpactDue to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of Inflationfuture cash flows associated with our unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authority. Therefore, $0.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above.

 

InflationDue to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future borrowings associated with our credit facility, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of any commitment fees charged on the unused portion of the credit facility. Therefore, the maximum estimated commitment fee of $0.8 million per annum is excluded from the contractual obligations table above.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has not had a significant impact on our historical operations.commitment to invest up to $2.0 million in three limited partnership investments through 2027. Due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with the limited partnership investments, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period in which such additional investments may take place. Therefore, $2.0 million of potential limited partnership investment commitments have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2017,2018, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities Exchange Commission Regulation S-K.

 

Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

We are subject to the impact of interest rate changes and may be subject to changes in the market values of our future investments. We invest our excess cash in bank overnight deposits, money market funds, and marketable securities. We have not used derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. Earnings from investments in bank overnight deposits, money market mutual funds, and marketable securities may be adversely affected in the future should interest rates decline, although such a decline may reduce the interest rate payable on any borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. As of December  31, 2017,2018, a 1% increase or decrease in interest rates would not have a material impact on our future earnings, fair values, or cash flows related to investments in cash equivalents or interest earning marketable securities.

 

Changing interest rates could also have a negative impact onOn August 1, 2018, the amountCompany amended its Prior Credit Facility to extend the maturity date of interest expense we incur. On July 2, 2015, we amended our credit and term loan agreement. The credit agreement provides for a $150 millionthe revolving credit facility from July 2, 2020 to August 1, 2023, and to increase available borrowings from $150 million to $250 million, with an option, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and satisfaction of certain conditions, to

72


Table of Contents

increase the commitments under the revolving facility or establish one or more incremental term loans under certain conditions. The credit agreement has(each, an “Incremental Facility”) in an aggregate amount of up to the sum of (x) $150 million and (y) if such Incremental Facility is incurred in connection with a maturity date of July 2, 2020.permitted acquisition, any amount so long as the Company’s leverage ratio (calculated on a trailing four-quarter basis) on a pro forma basis will be no greater than 1.75:1.00. We had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility after prepayment of the term loan facility, andAmended Credit Facility as of December 31, 2017.2018. Borrowings under the revolving credit facilityAmended Credit Facility bear interest at a per annum rate equal to, at our election, LIBOR or a base rate, plus a margin ranging from 1.75%1.50% to 2.25%2.00%, depending on our leverage ratio. An unused commitment fee ranging from 0.25%0.20% to 0.35%0.30%, per annum, depending on our leverage ratio, accrues on unused amounts under the revolving credit facility.Amended Credit Facility. An increase in LIBOR would affect interest expense on any outstanding balance of the revolving credit facility. For every 100 basis points increase in LIBOR, we would incur an incremental $1.5$2.5 million in interest expense per year assuming the entire $150$250 million revolving credit facility was utilized.

 

6673


 

Table of Contents

Item 8.      Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

    

Page

StrayerStrategic Education, Inc.

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

6875

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162017 and 20172018 

 

7077

Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172018 

 

7178

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172018 

 

7178

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 20172018
 

 

7279

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 20172018
 

 

7380

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

 

7481

 

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

6774


 

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

StrayerStrategic Education, Inc.

 

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of StrayerStrategic Education, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

 

Basis for Opinions

 

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. 

 

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, management has excluded Capella Education Company from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2018. We have also excluded Capella Education Company from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Capella Education Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues excluded from management’s

75


Table of Contents

assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting represent 18% and 25%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies

68


Table of Contents

and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

McLean, Virginia

March 1, 20182019

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1993.

6976


 

Table of Contents

STRAYERSTRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2018

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

129,245

 

$

155,933

 

 

$

155,933

 

$

311,732

 

Marketable securities, current

 

 

 —

 

 

37,121

 

Tuition receivable, net

 

 

20,532

 

 

23,122

 

 

 

23,122

 

 

55,694

 

Other current assets

 

 

10,766

 

 

11,293

 

 

 

11,293

 

 

15,814

 

Total current assets

 

 

160,543

 

 

190,348

 

 

 

190,348

 

 

420,361

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

73,124

 

 

73,763

 

 

 

73,763

 

 

122,677

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

31,096

 

 

24,452

 

Marketable securities, non-current

 

 

 —

 

 

37,678

 

Deferred income tax assets

 

 

24,452

 

 

 —

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

7,260

 

 

328,344

 

Goodwill

 

 

20,744

 

 

20,744

 

 

 

20,744

 

 

732,540

 

Other assets

 

 

13,189

 

 

11,971

 

 

 

4,711

 

 

19,429

 

Total assets

 

$

298,696

 

$

321,278

 

 

$

321,278

 

$

1,661,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

$

41,132

 

$

46,177

 

 

$

46,177

 

$

85,979

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

1,883

 

 

1,038

 

 

 

1,038

 

 

419

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

16,691

 

 

21,851

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

133

 

 

 —

 

Contract liabilities

 

 

21,851

 

 

38,733

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

59,839

 

 

69,066

 

 

 

69,066

 

 

125,131

 

Deferred income tax liabilities

 

 

 —

 

 

59,358

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

50,483

 

 

43,015

 

 

 

43,015

 

 

51,316

 

Total liabilities

 

 

110,322

 

 

112,081

 

 

 

112,081

 

 

235,805

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $0.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 11,093,489 and 11,167,425 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively

 

 

111

 

 

112

 

Common stock, par value $0.01; 32,000,000 shares authorized; 11,167,425 and 21,743,498 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively

 

 

112

 

 

217

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

35,453

 

 

47,079

 

 

 

47,079

 

 

1,306,653

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

 —

 

 

32

 

Retained earnings

 

 

152,810

 

 

162,006

 

 

 

162,006

 

 

118,322

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

188,374

 

 

209,197

 

 

 

209,197

 

 

1,425,224

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

298,696

 

$

321,278

 

 

$

321,278

 

$

1,661,029

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

7077


 

Table of Contents

STRAYERSTRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

 

Revenues

 

$

434,437

 

$

441,088

 

$

454,851

 

 

$

441,088

 

$

454,851

 

$

634,185

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instruction and educational support

 

 

234,097

 

 

241,026

 

 

245,177

 

 

 

242,099

 

 

249,939

 

 

340,076

 

Marketing

 

 

70,084

 

 

79,025

 

 

82,574

 

 

 

79,025

 

 

82,540

 

 

136,979

 

Admissions advisory

 

 

16,304

 

 

17,832

 

 

19,494

 

 

 

17,832

 

 

19,004

 

 

31,466

 

General and administration

 

 

44,254

 

 

45,733

 

 

55,397

 

 

 

47,873

 

 

46,792

 

 

57,056

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

25,694

 

Merger costs

 

 

 —

 

 

11,879

 

 

45,745

 

Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets

 

 

(3,213)

 

 

(7,512)

 

 

19,909

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

364,739

 

 

383,616

 

 

402,642

 

 

 

383,616

 

 

402,642

 

 

656,925

 

Income from operations

 

 

69,698

 

 

57,472

 

 

52,209

 

Investment income

 

 

283

 

 

462

 

 

1,079

 

Interest expense

 

 

3,850

 

 

642

 

 

642

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

66,131

 

 

57,292

 

 

52,646

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

26,108

 

 

22,490

 

 

32,034

 

Net income

 

$

40,023

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

 

57,472

 

 

52,209

 

 

(22,740)

 

Other (expense) income

 

 

(180)

 

 

437

 

 

3,601

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

57,292

 

 

52,646

 

 

(19,139)

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

22,490

 

 

32,034

 

 

(3,468)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

$

(15,671)

 

Earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

3.78

 

$

3.28

 

$

1.93

 

 

$

3.28

 

$

1.93

 

$

(1.03)

 

Diluted

 

$

3.73

 

$

3.21

 

$

1.84

 

 

$

3.21

 

$

1.84

 

$

(1.03)

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

10,588

 

 

10,610

 

 

10,678

 

 

 

10,610

 

 

10,678

 

 

15,190

 

Diluted

 

 

10,740

 

 

10,845

 

 

11,199

 

 

 

10,845

 

 

11,199

 

 

15,190

 

Cash dividend declared per share

 

$

 —

 

$

1.00

 

$

1.50

 

 

 

 

STRAYERSTRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Net income

 

$

40,023

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative instrument, net of income tax

 

 

(88)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

39,935

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

$

(15,671)

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

32

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

$

(15,639)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7178


 

Table of Contents

STRAYERSTRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

    

Shares

    

Par Value

    

Capital

    

Earnings

    

Income (Loss)

    

Total

 

    

Shares

    

Par Value

    

Capital

    

Earnings

    

Income

    

Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

10,903,341

 

$

109

 

$

14,550

 

$

77,985

 

$

88

 

$

92,732

 

Tax shortfall associated with stock-based compensation arrangements

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(24)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(24)

 

Restricted stock grants, net of forfeitures

 

123,836

 

 

 1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,213

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,213

 

Change in fair value of derivative instrument, net of income tax

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(88)

 

 

(88)

 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

40,023

 

 

 —

 

 

40,023

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

11,027,177

 

$

110

 

$

24,738

 

$

118,008

 

$

 —

 

$

142,856

 

 

11,027,177

 

$

110

 

$

24,738

 

$

118,008

 

$

 —

 

$

142,856

 

Tax shortfall associated with stock-based compensation arrangements

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(51)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(51)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(51)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(51)

 

Restricted stock grants, net of forfeitures

 

66,312

 

 

 1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

66,312

 

 

 1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,767

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,767

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,767

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,767

 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

34,802

 

 

 —

 

 

34,802

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

34,802

 

 

 —

 

 

34,802

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

11,093,489

 

$

111

 

$

35,453

 

$

152,810

 

$

 —

 

$

188,374

 

 

11,093,489

 

$

111

 

$

35,453

 

$

152,810

 

$

 —

 

$

188,374

 

Restricted stock grants, net of forfeitures

 

73,936

 

 

 1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

73,936

 

 

 1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,627

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,627

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,627

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,627

 

Common stock dividends

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,416)

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,416)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,416)

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,416)

 

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

20,612

 

 

 —

 

 

20,612

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

20,612

 

 

 —

 

 

20,612

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

11,167,425

 

$

112

 

$

47,079

 

$

162,006

 

$

 —

 

$

209,197

 

 

11,167,425

 

$

112

 

$

47,079

 

$

162,006

 

$

 —

 

$

209,197

 

Impact of adoption of new accounting standard

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(171)

 

 

 —

 

 

(171)

 

Issuance of stock in connection with the acquisition of Capella Education Company

 

10,263,775

 

 

103

 

 

1,236,858

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,236,961

 

Filing fee related to new stock issuance

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(148)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(148)

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

14,994

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

14,994

 

Exercise of stock options, net

 

156,424

 

 

 1

 

 

8,647

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

8,648

 

Restricted stock grants, net of forfeitures

 

125,694

 

 

 1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Issuance of restricted stock, net

 

30,180

 

 

 —

 

 

(776)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(776)

 

Common stock dividends

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(27,842)

 

 

 —

 

 

(27,842)

 

Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

32

 

 

32

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(15,671)

 

 

 —

 

 

(15,671)

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

21,743,498

 

$

217

 

$

1,306,653

 

$

118,322

 

$

32

 

$

1,425,224

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

7279


 

Table of Contents

STRAYERSTRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

 

2017

 

    

2016

    

2017

 

2018

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

40,023

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

34,802

 

$

20,612

 

$

(15,671)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of gain on sale of assets

 

 

(280)

 

 

(281)

 

 

(133)

 

 

 

(281)

 

 

(133)

 

 

 —

 

Amortization of deferred rent

 

 

(345)

 

 

(1,441)

 

 

(1,780)

 

 

 

(1,441)

 

 

(1,780)

 

 

(1,716)

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

1,229

 

 

262

 

 

262

 

 

 

262

 

 

262

 

 

292

 

Amortization of investment discount/premium

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

298

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

18,104

 

 

17,817

 

 

18,733

 

 

 

17,817

 

 

18,733

 

 

54,543

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(4,006)

 

 

(8,697)

 

 

6,429

 

 

 

(8,697)

 

 

6,429

 

 

(16,322)

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

10,213

 

 

10,767

 

 

11,627

 

 

 

10,767

 

 

11,627

 

 

15,532

 

Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets

 

 

(3,213)

 

 

(7,512)

 

 

19,909

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuition receivable, net

 

 

(1,991)

 

 

(1,453)

 

 

(3,250)

 

 

 

(1,453)

 

 

(3,250)

 

 

7,880

 

Other current assets

 

 

4,005

 

 

(3,949)

 

 

(527)

 

 

 

(3,936)

 

 

(526)

 

 

3,768

 

Other assets

 

 

22

 

 

(1,865)

 

 

1,582

 

 

 

(1,865)

 

 

1,582

 

 

(135)

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

(752)

 

 

(262)

 

 

4,468

 

 

 

(262)

 

 

4,468

 

 

1,140

 

Income taxes payable and income taxes receivable

 

 

1,835

 

 

(408)

 

 

(629)

 

 

 

(408)

 

 

(629)

 

 

(516)

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

12,465

 

 

7,018

 

 

8,212

 

Contract liabilities

 

 

7,018

 

 

8,212

 

 

(19,329)

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

(2,974)

 

 

(7,800)

 

 

(9,451)

 

 

 

(4,587)

 

 

(1,938)

 

 

(2,806)

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

77,548

 

 

44,510

 

 

56,155

 

 

 

44,523

 

 

56,157

 

 

46,867

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used) acquired in acquisition

 

 

(7,635)

 

 

 —

 

 

167,859

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(12,692)

 

 

(13,161)

 

 

(18,051)

 

 

 

(13,161)

 

 

(18,051)

 

 

(27,547)

 

Cash used in acquisition, net of cash acquired

 

 

 —

 

 

(7,635)

 

 

 —

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(12,692)

 

 

(20,796)

 

 

(18,051)

 

Purchases of marketable securities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(25,304)

 

Maturities of marketable securities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

16,367

 

Other investments

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,238)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

 

(20,796)

 

 

(18,051)

 

 

130,137

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common dividends paid

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,416)

 

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,416)

 

 

(27,842)

 

Payments on term loan

 

 

(118,750)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

8,648

 

Taxes paid for restricted stock units

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(859)

 

Payments of contingent consideration

 

 

(650)

 

 

(1,358)

 

 

 —

 

 

 

(1,358)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Payment of deferred financing costs

 

 

(850)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,162)

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(120,250)

 

 

(1,358)

 

 

(11,416)

 

 

 

(1,358)

 

 

(11,416)

 

 

(21,215)

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(55,394)

 

 

22,356

 

 

26,688

 

Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period

 

 

162,283

 

 

106,889

 

 

129,245

 

Cash and cash equivalents — end of period

 

$

106,889

 

$

129,245

 

$

155,933

 

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

22,369

 

 

26,690

 

 

155,789

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash — beginning of period

 

 

107,389

 

 

129,758

 

 

156,448

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash — end of period

 

$

129,758

 

$

156,448

 

$

312,237

 

Noncash transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable

 

$

365

 

$

349

 

$

1,734

 

 

$

349

 

$

1,734

 

$

1,029

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

7380


 

Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.    Nature of Operations

 

StrayerStrategic Education, Inc. (the(“Strategic Education” or the “Company”), a Maryland corporation conductsformerly known as Strayer Education, Inc., is a national leader in education innovation, dedicated to enabling economic mobility for working adults through education. As further discussed in Note 2 and Note 3, the Company completed its operations through its wholly-owned subsidiaries,merger with Capella Education Company (“CEC”) on August 1, 2018. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes include the results of the Company’s three reportable segments: Strayer University, (the “University”)Capella University, and New York Code and Design Academy (“NYCDA”).Non-Degree Programs. The University is an accredited institution of higher education that provides undergraduate and graduate degreesCompany’s reportable segments are discussed further in various fields of study through physical campuses, predominantly located in the eastern United States, and online. NYCDA is a New York City-based provider of web and application software development courses. NYCDA courses are delivered primarily on-ground to students seeking to further their career in software application development. The Company has only one reportable segment.Note 18.

 

2.    Significant Accounting Policies

 

Financial Statement Presentation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. On January 13, 2016, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of NYCDA, and the results of NYCDA are included with the Company from the acquisition date. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Revenue RecognitionOn August 1, 2018, the Company completed its merger with CEC, whereby the Company was deemed the acquirer in the business combination for accounting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Therefore, Strayer Education, Inc. is considered Strategic Education’s predecessor, and its historical financial statements prior to the merger date are reflected in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as the historical financial statements of the Company. Accordingly, the financial results of the Company as of and for any periods ended prior to August 1, 2018 do not include the financial results of CEC and therefore are not directly comparable.

 

The Company’s educational programs typically are offered on a quarterly basis and such periods coincideCertain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. Specifically, costs incurred in connection with the Company’s quarterly financial reporting periods. During the year ended December 31, 2017, most of the Company’s revenue camemerger with CEC were reclassified from the University, which derived approximately 96% of its revenues from tuition revenue, which is recognized in the quarter of instruction. Tuition revenue is assessed for collectibility on a student-by-student basis throughout the quarter of instruction,general and is shown net of any refunds, withdrawals, corporate discounts, scholarships,administration expense to merger costs, and employee tuition discounts. This collectibility assessment considers available sources of funds for the student, including financial aid programs provided through Title IV of the Higher Education Act. The Company reassesses the collectibility of tuition revenue that it may earn based on new information and changes in the facts and circumstances relevantadjustments to a student’s ability to pay, including the timing of a student’s withdrawal from a program of study.

At the start of each academic term or program, a liability (deferred revenue) is recorded for academic services to be provided and a tuition receivable is recorded for the portion of the tuition not paid in advance. Any cash received prior to the start of an academic term or program is recorded as deferred revenue. Some students may be eligible for scholarship awards, the estimated value of which will be realized in the future and is deducted from revenue when earned, based on historical student attendance and completion behavior. Deferred revenue is recorded as a current or long-term liability in the consolidated balance sheets based on when the benefit is expected to be realized. Revenues also include textbook-related income, certificate revenue, certain academic fees, licensing revenue, and other income, which are recognized when earned.

The Company’s refund policy typically permits students who complete less than half of a course to receive a partial refund of tuition for that course. Refunds reduce the tuition revenue that would have otherwise been recognized for that student. Since the University’s academic terms coincide with the Company’s financial reporting periods, nearly all refunds are processed and recorded within the same quarter as the corresponding revenue. The amount of tuition revenue refundable to students may vary based on the student’s state of residence. Unused books and related academic materials may be returned for a full refund within 21 days of the start of class; however, purchases of electronic content are not refundable if downloaded. Revenues derived from fees are not eligible for a refund.

74


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Graduation Fund

In 2013, the University introduced the Graduation Fund, which allows new undergraduate students to earn tuition credits that are redeemable in the final year of a student’s course of study if he or she successfully remains in the program. New students registering in credit-bearing courses in any undergraduate program receive one free course for every three courses that are successfully completed. Students must meet all of the University’s admission requirements, and must be enrolled in a bachelor’s degree program. The Company’s employees and their dependents are not eligible for the program. Students who have more than one consecutive term of non-attendance lose any Graduation Fund credits earned to date, but may earn and accumulate new credits if the student is reinstated or readmitted by the University in the future.

Revenue from students participating in the Graduation Fund is recorded in accordance with the Revenue Recognition Topic, ASC 605-50. The Company defers the value of benefits estimated to be redeemed in the future based on the underlying revenue transactions that result in progress by the student toward earning the benefit. The Company’s estimate of the benefits that will be redeemed in the future is based on its historical experience of student persistence toward completion of a course of study within this program and similar programs. Each quarter, the Company assesses its methodologies and assumptions underlying these estimates and, to date, any adjustmentscontingent consideration related to the estimates have not been material.Company’s acquisition of The amount estimatedNew York Code and Design Academy, Inc. (“NYCDA”) were reclassified from instruction and educational support expense to be redeemed in the next 12 months is $19.1 millionfair value adjustments and is included in deferred revenue as a current liability inimpairment of intangible assets within the consolidated balance sheets.

The table below presents activity in the Graduation Fundstatements of income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 (in thousands):2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31,

 

    

December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

    

2017

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

20,937

 

    

$

29,499

 

Revenue deferred

 

 

20,766

 

 

 

25,360

 

Benefit redeemed

 

 

(12,204)

 

 

 

(17,459)

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

29,499

 

 

$

37,400

 

New accounting standard for revenue recognition

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”) which supersedes the prior revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. During 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued additional ASUs amending certain aspects of ASU 2014-09. On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the new accounting standard and all the related amendments (“ASC 606”) using the modified retrospective method. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. The Company expects the impact of the adoption of the new standard to be immaterial to the Company’s net income on an ongoing basis. Refer to Note 4 for further discussion.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash maintained in mostly FDIC-insured bank accounts and cash invested in bank overnight deposits and money market mutual funds. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with various financial institutions. The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

 

Most cash and cash equivalent balances are in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company has not experienced any losses on its cash and cash equivalents.

81


Table of Contents

 

Restricted Cash

 

A significant portion of the Company’s revenues are funded by various federal and state government programs. The Company generally does not receive funds from these programs prior to the start of the corresponding academic term. The Company may be required to return certain funds for students who withdraw from Strayer University and Capella University (“the UniversityUniversities”) during the academic term. The Company had approximately $13,000$15,000 and $15,000$5,000 of these unpaid obligations as of December 31, 20162017 and 2017,2018, respectively, of these unpaid obligations, which are recorded as restricted cash and included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

75


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As part of commencing operations in Pennsylvania in 2003, the Company was required to maintain a “minimum protective endowment” of at least $0.5 million in an interest-bearing account. These funds are requiredaccount as long as the Company operates its campuses in the state. The Company holds these funds in an interest-bearing account which is included in other assets.

 

The following table illustrates the reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows as of December 31, 2017 and 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2017

 

2018

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

155,933

 

$

311,732

Restricted cash included in other current assets

 

 

15

 

 

 5

Restricted cash included in other long-term assets

 

 

500

 

 

500

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows

 

$

156,448

 

$

312,237

Marketable Securities

Management determines the appropriate designation of marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. All of the Company’s marketable securities are designated as available-for-sale and consist of tax-exempt municipal securities, variable rate demand notes, and corporate debt securities.

Available-for-sale marketable securities are carried at fair value as determined by quoted market prices or other inputs either directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace for identical or similar assets, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity. Management reviews the fair value of the portfolio at least quarterly, and evaluates individual securities with fair value below amortized cost at the balance sheet date for impairment. In order to determine whether impairment is other than temporary, management evaluates whether the Company intends to sell the impaired security and whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovering its amortized cost basis.

If management intends to sell an impaired debt security, or it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovering its amortized cost basis, an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred. The amount of an other-than-temporary impairment related to a credit loss, or securities that management intends to sell before recovery, is recognized in earnings. The amount of an other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities related to other factors is recorded consistent with changes in the fair value of all other available-for-sale securities as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity.

The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Amortization of premiums, accretion of discounts, interest, dividend income and realized gains and losses are included in other income. The contractual maturity date of available-for-sale securities is based on the days remaining to the effective maturity. The Company classifies marketable securities as either current or non-current assets based on management’s intent with regard to usage of those funds, which is dependent upon the security's maturity date and liquidity considerations based on current market conditions. If management intends to hold the securities for longer than one year as of the balance sheet date, they are classified as non-current.

82


Table of Contents

Tuition Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company records tuition receivable and deferred revenuecontract liabilities for its students upon the start of the academic term or program. Therefore, at the end of the quarter (and academic term), tuition receivable generally represents amounts due from students for educational services already provided and deferred revenuecontract liabilities generally represents advance payments from students for academic services to be provided in the future. Tuition receivables are not collateralized; however, credit risk is minimized as a result of the diverse nature of the University’sUniversities student base.bases and through the participation of the majority of the students in federally funded financial aid programs. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established primarily based upon historical collection rates by group of receivable reflecting factors such as age of receivable,the balance due, student academic status, and size of outstanding balance, net of estimated recoveries.recoveries, and consideration of other relevant factors. These collection rates incorporate historical performance based on a student’s current enrollment status and likelihood of future enrollment. The Company periodically assesses its methodologies for estimating bad debts in consideration of actual experience.

 

The Company’s tuition receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts were as follows as of December 31, 20162017 and 20172018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31, 2016

    

December 31, 2017

 

    

December 31, 2017

    

December 31, 2018

 

Tuition receivable

 

$

30,733

 

$

35,809

 

 

$

35,809

 

$

84,151

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(10,201)

 

 

(12,687)

 

 

 

(12,687)

 

 

(28,457)

 

Tuition receivable, net

 

$

20,532

 

$

23,122

 

 

$

23,122

 

$

55,694

 

 

 

Approximately $2.3$2.9 million and $2.9$1.1 million of tuition receivable is included in other assets as of December 31, 20162017 and 2017,2018, respectively, because these amounts are expected to be collected after 12 months.

 

The following table illustrates changes in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts for each of the three years ended December 31, 20172018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts, beginning of period

 

$

8,835

 

$

10,024

 

$

10,201

 

 

$

10,024

 

$

10,201

 

$

12,687

 

Additions charged to expense

 

 

13,067

 

 

16,503

 

 

21,751

 

 

 

16,503

 

 

21,751

 

 

37,704

 

Additions from merger

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6,601

 

Write-offs, net of recoveries

 

 

(11,878)

 

 

(16,326)

 

 

(19,265)

 

 

 

(16,326)

 

 

(19,265)

 

 

(28,535)

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts, end of period

 

$

10,024

 

$

10,201

 

$

12,687

 

 

$

10,201

 

$

12,687

 

$

28,457

 

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. In accordance with the Property, Plant, and Equipment Topic, ASC 360, the carrying values of the Company’s assets are re-evaluated when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined that an impairment loss has occurred based on expected undiscounted future cash flows, then a loss is recognized using a fair value-based model. Through 2017,2018, no such impairment loss had occurred. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives ranging from three to 40 years. Depreciation and amortization expense was $18.1 million, $17.8 million, $18.7 million and $18.7$31.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2017,2018, respectively. Included in the 2018 depreciation and amortization expense amount is $2.6 million of depreciation expense related to computer software acquired in the CEC merger, which is included in the amortization of intangible assets line on the consolidated statements of income.

 

Construction in progress includes costs of computer software developed for internal use, which is accounted for in accordance with the Internal-Use Software Topic, ASC 350-40. Computer software development costs that are incurred

76


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

in the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred. During the development stage, direct consulting costs, payroll, and payroll-related costs for employees that are directly associated with the project are capitalized and will be amortized over

83


Table of Contents

the estimated useful life of the software once placed into operation. Purchases of property and equipment and changes in accounts payable for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172018 in the consolidated statements of cash flows have been adjusted to exclude noncash purchases of property and equipment transactions during that period.

 

Fair Value

 

The Fair Value Measurement Topic, ASC 820-10 (“ASC 820-10”), establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs used to measure fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Under ASC 820-10, fair value of an investment is the price that would be received to sell an asset or to transfer a liability to an entity in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to assets and liabilities with readily available quoted prices in an active market and lowest priority to unobservable inputs, which require a higher degree of judgment when measuring fair value, as follows:

 

·

Level 1 assets or liabilities use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement date;

 

·

Level 2 assets or liabilities use observable inputs, other than quoted market prices, that are either directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace for identical or similar assets and liabilities; and

 

·

Level 3 assets or liabilities use unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.

 

The Company’s assets and liabilities that are subject to fair value measurement are categorized in one of the three levels above. Fair values are based on the inputs available at the measurement dates, and may rely on certain assumptions that may affect the valuation of fair value for certain assets or liabilities.

 

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the amount assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names, are recorded at fair market value on their acquisition date. An indefinite life was assigned to the trade names because the Company believes they have the continued ability to generate cash flows indefinitely.

 

Goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed at least annually for impairment during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the respective reporting unit below its carrying amount.

   

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, the Company performed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-livedFinite-lived intangible assets assigned to JWMI and NYCDA. Following a qualitative assessment, the Company determined that it is not more likely than not that theare acquired in business combinations are recorded at fair value of its goodwillon their acquisition dates and indefinite-lived intangible assets for JWMI was less than the carrying amount, and accordingly, no impairment existed in 2017. For goodwill assigned to NYCDA, the Company bypassed the qualitative assessment and performed Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test as well as a quantitative impairment test of the indefinite-lived intangible asset. Based on these tests, the Company determined the fair value of NYCDA exceeded its carrying value, and there was no impairment of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset assigned to NYCDA as of December 31, 2017.

77


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents changes in goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2017

Balance as of the beginning of period

 

$

6,800

 

$

20,744

  Acquisition (see Note 3)

 

 

14,242

 

 

 —

Measurement period adjustments

 

 

(298)

 

 

 —

Balance as of the end of period

 

$

20,744

 

$

20,744

Long-Term Liabilities

Included in the Company’s long-term liabilities are amounts related to the Company’s operating leases, deferred payments related to a prior acquisition, and the non-current portion of deferred revenue. In conjunction with the opening of some campuses and other facilities, the Company was reimbursed by the lessors for improvements made to those leased properties. In accordance with the Operating Leases Subtopic, ASC 840-20 (“ASC 840-20”), these underlying assets were capitalized as leasehold improvements, and a liability was established for the reimbursements. The leasehold improvements and the liability are amortized on a straight-line basis over the corresponding lease terms, which generally range from five to ten years. In accordance with ASC 840-20,estimated useful life of the Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the initial termasset. Finite-lived intangible assets consist of a lease. The cumulative difference between the rent payment and the straight-line rent expense is recorded as a liability.student relationships.

 

The Company reviews its finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If such assets are not recoverable, a potential impairment loss is recognized to the extent the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

Authorized Stock

 

The Company has authorized 20,000,00032,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01, of which 11,093,48911,167,425 and 11,167,42521,743,498 shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 20162017 and 2017,2018, respectively. The Company also has authorized 8,000,000 shares of preferred stock, none of which is issued or outstanding. Before any preferred stock may be issued in the future, the Board of Directors would need to establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications, and the terms or conditions of the redemption of the preferred stock.

84


Table of Contents

In February 2017, the Company’s

The Board of Directors declared a regular, annualquarterly cash dividend of $1.00 $0.25 per common share in the first and second quarters of 2018 and a quarterly cash dividend of $0.50 per common stock. share in the third and fourth quarters of 2018. The Company paid $0.25 per common sharethese quarterly cash dividends in each of March, June, September and December of 2017.2018.

 

Advertising Costs

 

The Company expenses advertising costs in the quarter incurred, except for costs associated with the production of media commercials, which are expensed when the commercial is first aired.incurred.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

As required by the Stock Compensation Topic, ASC 718, the Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units, and employee stock purchases related to the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, based on estimated fair values. The Company records compensation expense for all share-based payment awards ratably over the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, the Company measures fair value and records compensation expense separately for each vesting tranche. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172018 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and, therefore, has been adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises the estimate, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The forfeiture rate used is based on historical experience. The Company also assesses the likelihood that performance criteria associated with performance-based awards will be met. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that performance criteria will not be achieved, the Company revises its estimate of the number of shares it believes will ultimately vest.

78


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): ImprovementsRefer to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 impacts several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including classification of certain items on the consolidated statement of cash flows and accounting for income taxes. Specifically, ASU 2016-09 requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in earnings, which may introduce significant volatility to the Company’s provision for income taxes. Also, all tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments will now be reported as operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The Company has elected to apply this cash flow guidance prospectively and there was no impact to the prior period presentation. In addition, pursuant to ASU 2016-09, the Company has elected to continue to estimate forfeitures ratably over the life of awards. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 has not materially impacted the Company’s financial statements. See Note 811 for additional information.

 

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur assuming conversion or exercise of all dilutive unexercised stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units. The dilutive effect of stock awards was determined using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, all of the following are assumed to be used to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock: (1) the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options, and (2) the amount of compensation cost associated with the stock awards for future service not yet recognized by the Company. Stock options are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the stock option exercise price of an individual grant exceeds the average market price for the period. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017, the Company had no issued and outstanding stock options that were excluded from the calculation.

Set forth below is a reconciliation of shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for each of the three years ended December 31, 20172018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

 

2016

    

2017

    

2018

Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute basic earnings per share

 

10,588

 

10,610

 

10,678

 

 

10,610

 

10,678

 

15,190

Incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options

 

 6

 

 5

 

39

 

 

 5

 

39

 

 —

Unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units

 

146

 

230

 

482

 

 

230

 

482

 

 —

Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share

 

10,740

 

10,845

 

11,199

 

Shares used to compute diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

10,845

 

11,199

 

15,190

 

Income TaxesDuring the year ended December 31, 2018, approximately 611,000 shares issuable in connection with stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation because the effect would have been antidilutive due to the Company’s net loss during the period. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, the Company had no issued and outstanding awards that were excluded from the calculation.

 

The Company provides for deferred income taxes based on temporary differences between financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

The Income Taxes Topic, ASC 740, requires the company to determine whether uncertain tax positions should be recognized within the Company’s financial statements. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Uncertain tax positions are recognized when a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is determined more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Upon determination, uncertain tax positions are measured to determine the amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position is derecognized if it no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being sustained.

The tax years since 2014 remain open for federal tax examination and the tax years since 2013 remain open to examination by state and local taxing jurisdictions in which the Company is subject.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets

7985


 

Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the period reported. The most significant management estimates include allowances for doubtful accounts, useful lives of property and equipment, fair value of future contractual operating lease obligations, potential sublease income and vacancy periods, accrued expenses, forfeiture rates and the likelihood of achieving performance criteria for stock-based awards, value of free courses earned by students that will be redeemed in the future, valuation of goodwill, intangible assets, fair value of contingent consideration, and the provision for income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Comprehensive Income

 

Comprehensive income consists ofincludes net income and the changeall changes in the Company’s equity during a period from non-owner sources, which for the Company consists of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of tax. As of December 31, 2018, the balance of accumulated other comprehensive income was $32.2 thousand, net of tax of $9.5 thousand. There were no changes in equity from non-owner sources for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017. There were no reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018.

Income Taxes

The Company provides for deferred income taxes based on temporary differences between financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that more likely than not will be realized.

The Income Taxes Topic, ASC 740, requires the company to determine whether uncertain tax positions should be recognized within the Company’s financial statements. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Uncertain tax positions are recognized when a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is determined more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Upon determination, uncertain tax positions are measured to determine the amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position is derecognized if it no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being sustained.

The tax years since 2015 remain open for federal tax examination and the tax years since 2014 remain open to examination by state and local taxing jurisdictions in which the Company is subject.

Other Investments

Through the merger with CEC, the Company holds investments in limited partnerships that invest in innovative companies in the health care and education-related technology fields. Prior to the consummation of the merger, CEC accounted for these investments at cost less impairment with subsequent adjustments for any observable price changes reflected within earnings. In connection with the Company’s ongoing integration efforts to align accounting policies, the Company elected to account for the investments in limited partnerships under the equity method beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Company accounts for the investments made through its venture fund, SEI Ventures, at cost less impairment as these investments do not have readily determinable fair value.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the period reported. The most significant management estimates include allowances for doubtful accounts, useful lives of property and equipment and intangible assets, fair value of future contractual operating lease obligations, potential sublease income and vacancy periods, accrued expenses, forfeiture rates and the Company’s previous interest rate swap, netlikelihood of achieving performance criteria for stock-based awards, value of free courses earned by students that will be redeemed in the future, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, and the provision for income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

RecentRecently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014,January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)ASU 2016-01, which revises the accounting requirements related to the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The update also changes certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. These changes will require an entity to measure, at fair value, investments in equity securities and other ownership interests in an entity that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method – and recognize the changes in fair value within net income. Entities that hold equity investments

86


Table of Contents

without readily determinable fair values will be able to elect to record those investments at cost less impairment with subsequent adjustments for any observable price changes recognized in earnings. The Company has provided the required disclosures related to its investments within Note 17. For its investments that are not accounted for under the equity method and are deemed to be without readily determinable fair values, the Company has elected the option to record the investments at cost less impairment and recognize subsequent adjustments for any observable price changes within earnings. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 606)230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2014-09”2016-15”) which supersedes. ASU 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the revenue recognition requirementsStatement of Cash Flows by providing guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. The Company adopted the standard retrospectively on January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its consolidated statements of cash flows.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). Under ASU 2016-18, an entity should include in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition,its cash and most industry-specific guidance. The core principlecash-equivalent balances in the statement of ASU 2014-09 is for a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amountcash flows those amounts that reflects the consideration to which the company expectsare deemed to be entitledrestricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 retrospectively on January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its consolidated statements of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill only in exchangethe event that an impairment is recognized. The amendments in this update should be adopted on a prospective basis for those goodsthe annual or services. The effective date of ASU 2014-09 is for fiscal years, andany interim periods within those years,goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued additional ASUs amending certain aspects of ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 allows either a full retrospective2019, though early adoption to all periods presented or a modified retrospective adoption approach, with the cumulative effect of initial application of the revised guidance recognized at the date of initial application.

is permitted. The Company has finalized its assessment of key revenue streams, including a comparison of current accounting policies and practices to the new standard, and is determining the appropriate changes to business processes and controls. Based on its evaluation to date, the Company believes that under the new standard, the allocation of revenue to certain performance obligations will result in changes in the timing of revenue recognition between interim periods for one of its performance obligations. However, any changes associated with the adoption of ASU 2014-09 are not expected to have a significant impact on annual revenue recognized, and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has adopted ASU 2014-09this guidance effective as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach and accordingly, will complete the analysis of the cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings and prepare enhanced disclosures pertaining to revenue recognition, including additional information about performance obligations, contract balances, and significant judgments and estimates used in applying the guidance, for the quarterly and annual filings beginninghas applied it in the first quartermeasurement of 2018.goodwill since the adoption date.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). The new guidance, which requires the recognition oflessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases.all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Under current guidance, operating leases are off-balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 also requires more extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures about leasing arrangements. During 2018, the FASB has issued additional ASUs amending certain aspects of ASU 2016-02. ASU 2016-02 applies to fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, with early adoption permitted. An entity may choose to use either its effective date or the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application.

The Company will adopt the new standard on January 1, 2019 and will use the effective date as the date of initial application. Accordingly, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. The Company expects to elect the package of practical expedients permitted under ASU 2016-02, which allows the Company to not reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification, and initial direct costs under the new standard. The Company anticipates that the impact of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated balance sheet will be material as the Company will record significant asset and corresponding liability balances in connection with its leased properties. The final financial statement impacts will depend on the lease portfolio and discount rates as of the adoption date. The Company does not expect ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated statements of income and cash flows.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses which applies to ASC Topic 326, (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The new guidance revises the accounting requirements related to the measurement of credit losses and will require organizations to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts about collectibility. Assets must be presented in the financial statements at the net amount expected to be collected. The guidance will be effective for the Company's annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption

87


Table of Contents

permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact this standard will have on its financial condition, results of operations, and disclosures.

80


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In November 2016,June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 230)718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-18”2018-07”)., which simplifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services. Under ASU 2016-18, an entity should include in its cash2018-07, most of the current guidance on such payments to nonemployees would be aligned with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees, including determination of measurement date and cash-equivalent balances in the statement of cash flows those amounts that are deemed to be restricted cashaccounting for performance conditions and restricted cash equivalents. The standard will befor share-based payments after vesting. ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and theyears. The Company does not expect adoption of ASU 2016-18this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill only in the event that an impairment is recognized. The amendments in this update should be adopted on a prospective basis for the annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019, though early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance effective as of January 1, 2018, and does not expect it will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Other ASUs issued by the FASB but not yet effective are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

3.     Business Combinations

Merger with Capella Education Company

On August 1, 2018, the Company completed its merger with CEC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, pursuant to a merger agreement dated October 29, 2017. The merger is expected to enable the Company to be a national leader in education innovation that improves affordability and enhances career outcomes by offering complementary programs and sharing academic and technological best practices, through a best-in-class corporate platform supporting two independent universities.

Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Company issued 0.875 shares of the Company’s common stock for each issued and outstanding share of CEC common stock. Outstanding equity awards held by CEC employees and certain nonemployee directors of CEC were assumed by the Company and converted into comparable Company awards at the exchange ratio. Outstanding equity awards held by CEC nonemployee directors who did not serve as directors of the Company after completion of the merger were converted to Company awards and settled. Outstanding equity awards held by former employees of CEC who left before completion of the merger were settled upon completion of the merger in exchange for cash payments as specified in the merger agreement.

The following table summarizes the components of the aggregate consideration transferred for the acquisition of CEC (in thousands):

 

 

 

Fair value of Company common stock issued in exchange for CEC outstanding shares(1)

$

1,209,483

Fair value of Company equity-based awards issued in exchange for CEC equity-based awards

 

27,478

Total fair value of consideration transferred

$

1,236,961


(1)

The Company issued 10,263,775 common shares at a market price of $117.84 in exchange for each issued and outstanding share of CEC common stock.

The Company applied the acquisition method of accounting to CEC’s business, whereby the excess of the acquisition date fair value of consideration transferred over the fair value of identifiable net assets was allocated to goodwill. Goodwill reflects workforce and synergies expected from cost savings, operations, and revenue enhancements of the combined company that are expected to result from the acquisition. The goodwill recorded as part of the merger has been provisionally allocated to the Strayer University and Capella University reportable segments in the amount of $330.6 million and $395.2 million, respectively, and is not deductible for tax purposes. 

The Company incurred $19.1 million of acquisition-related costs which were recognized in Merger costs in the consolidated statements of income. Issuance costs of $0.1 million were recognized in additional paid-in capital in the consolidated balance sheets.

88


Table of Contents

The preliminary opening balance sheet is subject to adjustment based on final assessment of the fair values of certain acquired assets and liabilities, primarily intangible assets and income taxes. As the Company finalizes its assessment of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, additional purchase price adjustments may be recorded during the measurement period. The Company reflects measurement period adjustments, if any, in the period in which the adjustments occur. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company reduced current assets by $0.5 million, long term assets by $1.4 million, and acquired deferred income tax liability by $0.1 million, which resulted in a $1.8 million increase to goodwill recognized in connection with the CEC merger.

The preliminary fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as well as a reconciliation to consideration transferred is presented in the table below (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

167,859

Marketable securities, current

 

 

31,419

Tuition receivable

 

 

39,141

Income tax receivable

 

 

163

Other current assets

 

 

8,496

Marketable securities, non-current

 

 

34,700

Property and equipment, net

 

 

53,182

Other assets

 

 

14,556

Intangible assets

 

 

349,800

Goodwill

 

 

725,740

    Total assets acquired

 

 

1,425,056

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

(46,735)

Contract liabilities

 

 

(39,000)

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(100,123)

Other long term liabilities

 

 

(2,237)

   Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(188,095)

         Total consideration

 

$

1,236,961

The table below presents a summary of intangible assets acquired (in thousands) and the weighted average useful lives of these assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Useful Life in Years

Trade names

 

$

183,800

 

Indefinite

Student relationships

 

 

166,000

 

3

 

 

$

349,800

 

 

The Company determined the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on assumptions that reasonable market participants would use while employing the concept of highest and best use of the assets and liabilities. The Company utilized the following assumptions, some of which include significant unobservable inputs which would qualify the valuations as Level 3 measurements, and valuation methodologies to determine fair value:

·

Intangible assets - To determine the fair value of the trade name, the Company used the relief from royalty approach. The excess earnings method was used to estimate the fair value of student relationships.

·

Property and equipment - Included in property and equipment is course content of $14.0 million, valued using the relief from royalty approach, and internally developed software of $5.0 million, valued using the cost approach. Each will be amortized over three years. All other property and equipment was valued at estimated cost.

·

Contract liabilities - The Company estimated the fair value of contract liabilities using the cost build-up method, which represents the cost to deliver the services plus a normal profit margin.

89


Table of Contents

·

Other current and noncurrent assets and liabilities - The carrying value of all other assets and liabilities approximated fair value at the time of acquisition.

The operations of CEC were included in the consolidated financial statements as of the acquisition date. The revenue and net loss for CEC reported within the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $160.4 million and $39.6 million, respectively.

Pro Forma Financial information

The following unaudited pro forma information has been presented as if the CEC acquisition occurred on January 1, 2017. The information is based on the historical results of operations of the acquired business, adjusted for:

·

The allocation of purchase price and related adjustments, including the adjustments to amortization expense related to the fair value of intangible assets acquired.

·

The exclusion of acquisition-related costs incurred during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018.

·

Associated tax-related impacts of adjustments.

·

Changes to align accounting policies.

The pro forma results do not necessarily represent what would have occurred if the acquisition had actually taken place on January 1, 2017, nor do they represent the results that may occur in the future. The pro forma adjustments are based on available information and upon assumptions the Company believes are reasonable to reflect the impact of this acquisition on the Company’s historical financial information on a supplemental pro forma basis (in thousands).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro Forma Combined

 

    

Year Ended

    

Year Ended

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2018

Revenue

 

$

895,262

 

$

923,945

Net Income

 

 

16,364

 

 

41,058

Acquisition of New York Code and Design Academy

 

On January 13, 2016, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of the New York Code and Design Academy, Inc. (“NYCDA”), a provider of web and application software development courses based in New York City (the “Acquisition”).City. The Acquisitionacquisition supports the Company’s strategy to complement its traditional degree offerings with a broader platform of educational services. The Company incurred transaction costs of approximately $0.2 million of acquisition-related costs, which were included in general and administrative costs.administration costs in the consolidated statements of income. The Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.Company applied the acquisition method of accounting to the purchase of NYCDA’s business.

 

The purchase price included $2.4 million paid up front in cash, plus contingent cash payments of (a) up to $12.5 million payable based on NYCDA’s results of operations over a five-year period (the “Earnout”), and (b) $5.5 million payable based on NYCDA’s receipt of state regulatory permits. Pursuant to the Acquisition,terms of the acquisition, $1.0 million of the Earnout may be accelerated upon receipt of one of the state regulatory permits. The Company recorded total contingent consideration of $14.5 million at the time of acquisition. In April 2016 and August 2016, NYCDA received the state regulatory permits and the Company paid $6.0 and $0.5 million of contingent consideration to the sellers, respectively.

 

In addition, the Company paid a total of $4.6 million to two of NYCDA’s founders who are required to remain employed for at least three years from the acquisition date. If either of them terminates employment voluntarily, or is terminated for cause (as defined), he is required to reimburse the Company his respective portion of the retention amount. This amount was classified as prepaid compensation and is being amortized to compensation expense over three years.

 

Total potential cash payments for the Acquisition, including the contingent cash payments and prepaid compensation, could total $25.0 million.

8190


 

Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase

 

 

 

 

Price

 

 

 

 

Allocation

 

Useful Life

Cash

$

790

 

 

Other assets

 

1,265

 

 

Intangibles:

 

 

 

 

  Trade name

 

5,660

 

Indefinite

  Goodwill

 

13,944

 

 

Liabilities assumed

 

(4,734)

 

 

     Total assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net

 

16,925

 

 

Less: contingent consideration

 

(14,500)

 

 

Less: cash acquired

 

(790)

 

 

     Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired

$

1,635

 

 

 

The fair value of the Earnout was originallyinitially measured by applyingusing a probability weighted discounted cash flow model based on significant inputs not observable in the market (Level 3 inputs). Key assumptions included thea discount rate of 4.5% and expected future value of payments at the time, of $12.5 million. Following its initial recognition, the Company has adjusted the carrying value of the Earnout to the fair value  to reflect revisions to the business plan, expectations relative to achieving the performance targets over the earnout period, and the impact of the discount rate. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company revised its assumptions ofrelated to the timing of future cash flows, and recorded an adjustmentwhich resulted in a $1.3 million decrease to reduce the faircarrying value of contingent consideration by $1.3 million.the Earnout liability fair value. During 2017, the Company continued to updatefurther revised its near-term revenue projections for NYCDA. As of December 31, 2017, the Company estimatesNYCDA and as a result estimated that no amounts under the Earnout willwould be paid andpaid. Accordingly, the relatedCompany recorded a $7.8 million fair value adjustment to reduce the Earnout liability has been recorded at zero.to zero during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Earnout fair value adjustments are included in the Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets line on the consolidated statements of income. No fair value adjustments were recorded to the Earnout liability in 2017 aggregated to $7.8 million. The Company will continue to update its forecasts each period and record any fair value adjustments, as necessary.the year ended December 31, 2018. The maximum possible amount that could still be paid under the Earnout is $11.5 million.

The fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was determined based on assumptions that reasonable market participants would use while employing the concept of highest and best use of the respective items. The following assumptions were used, the majority of which include significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), and valuation methodologies to determine fair value:

·

Intangibles – Income approaches were used to value the substantial majority of the acquired intangibles. The trade name was valued using the relief-from-royalty method, which represents the benefit of owning these intangible assets rather than paying royalties for their use.

·

Other assets and liabilities – The carrying value of all other assets and liabilities approximated fair value at the time of acquisition.

 

Pro forma financial information for the NYCDA acquisition has not been presented as it was not material to the Company’s consolidated results.

 

4.     Revenue Recognition

Impact of Adoption of ASC 606 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect in those reporting periods.

91


Table of Contents

The Company recorded an adjustment to reduce opening retained earnings by $0.2 million, net of tax, due to the impact of adopting ASC 606, primarily related to the allocation of tuition revenue across various performance obligations involved in certain student contract arrangements. In accordance with ASC 606, the disclosure of the impact of adoption on the Company’s consolidated income statement and balance sheet as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

    

As Reported

    

Balances without Adoption of ASC 606

 

Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)

Income Statement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

634,185

 

$

634,248

 

$

(63)

Instruction and educational support expense

 

 

340,076

 

 

340,083

 

 

(7)

Benefit for income taxes

 

 

(3,468)

 

 

(3,453)

 

 

(15)

Net loss

 

 

(15,671)

 

 

(15,630)

 

 

(41)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2018

 

    

As Reported

    

Balances without Adoption of ASC 606

 

Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuition receivable – net

 

$

55,694

 

$

54,660

 

$

1,034

Other current assets

 

 

15,814

 

 

17,142

 

 

(1,328)

Income taxes payable

 

 

419

 

 

500

 

 

(81)

Retained earnings

 

 

118,322

 

 

118,535

 

 

(213)

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenues primarily consist of tuition revenue arising from educational services provided in the form of classroom instruction and online courses. Tuition revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the period of instruction, which varies depending on the course format and chosen program of study. Strayer’s educational programs and Capella’s GuidedPath classes typically are offered on a quarterly basis and such periods coincide with the Company’s quarterly financial reporting periods, while Capella’s FlexPath courses are delivered over a twelve-week subscription period.

The following table presents the Company’s revenues from contracts with customers disaggregated by material revenue category for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

Strayer University Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Tuition, net of discounts, grants and scholarships

 

$

418,220

 

$

433,938

 

$

451,646

    Other1

 

 

16,933

 

 

15,609

 

 

19,458

Total Strayer University Segment

 

 

435,153

 

 

449,547

 

 

471,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capella University Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Tuition, net of discounts, grants and scholarships

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

147,138

    Other1

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,780

Total Capella University Segment

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

154,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Degree Programs Segment2

 

 

5,935

 

 

5,304

 

 

8,163

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated revenue

 

$

441,088

 

$

454,851

 

$

634,185


4.(1) Other revenue is primarily comprised of academic fees, sales of textbooks, other course materials, and other revenue streams.

(2) Non-Degree Programs revenue is primarily comprised of tuition revenue and placement fee revenue.

92


Table of Contents

Revenues are recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods and services. The Company applies the five-step revenue model under ASC 606 to determine when revenue is earned and recognized.

Arrangements with students may have multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, the Company allocates net tuition revenue to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The Company generally determines standalone selling prices based on the prices charged to customers and observable market prices. The standalone selling price of material rights to receive free classes in the future is estimated based on class tuition prices and likelihood of redemption based on historical student attendance and completion behavior.

At the start of each academic term or program, a liability (contract liability) is recorded for academic services to be provided and a tuition receivable is recorded for the portion of the tuition not paid in advance. Any cash received prior to the start of an academic term or program is recorded as a contract liability. Some students may be eligible for scholarship awards, the estimated value of which will be realized in the future and is deducted from revenue when earned, based on historical student attendance and completion behavior. Contract liabilities are recorded as a current or long-term liability in the consolidated balance sheets based on when the benefit is expected to be realized.

Course materials available through Capella enable students to access electronically all required materials for courses in which they enroll during the quarter. Revenue derived from course materials is recognized ratably over the duration of the course as the Company provides the student with continuous access to these materials during the term. For sales of certain other course materials, the Company is considered the agent in the transaction and as such the Company recognizes revenue net of amounts owed to the vendor at the time of sale. Revenues also include certain academic fees recognized within the quarter of instruction, and certificate revenue and licensing revenue, which are recognized as the services are provided. 

Graduation Fund

In 2013, Strayer University introduced the Graduation Fund, which allows new undergraduate students to earn tuition credits that are redeemable in the final year of a student’s course of study if he or she successfully remains in the program. New students registering in credit-bearing courses in any undergraduate program receive one free course for every three courses that are successfully completed. Students must meet all of Strayer University’s admission requirements, and must be enrolled in a bachelor’s degree program. The Company’s employees and their dependents are not eligible for the program. Students who have more than one consecutive term of non-attendance lose any Graduation Fund credits earned to date, but may earn and accumulate new credits if the student is reinstated or readmitted by Strayer University in the future.

Revenue from students participating in the Graduation Fund is recorded in accordance with ASC 606. The Company defers the value of the related performance obligation associated with the credits estimated to be redeemed in the future based on the underlying revenue transactions that result in progress by the student toward earning the benefit. The Company’s estimate of the benefits that will be redeemed in the future is based on its historical experience of student persistence toward completion of a course of study within this program and similar programs. Each quarter, the Company assesses its methodologies and assumptions underlying these estimates, and to date, any adjustments to the estimates have not been material. The amount estimated to be redeemed in the next 12 months is $20.8 million and is included as a current contract liability in the consolidated balance sheets. The remainder is expected to be redeemed within two to four years.

93


Table of Contents

The table below presents activity in the Graduation Fund for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

    

December 31, 2018

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

29,499

 

    

$

37,400

 

Revenue deferred

 

 

25,360

 

 

 

27,349

 

Benefit redeemed

 

 

(17,459)

 

 

 

(21,420)

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

37,400

 

 

$

43,329

 

Unbilled receivables – Student tuition

Academic materials may be shipped to certain new undergraduate students in advance of the term of enrollment. Under ASC 606, the materials represent a performance obligation to which the Company allocates revenue based on the fair value of the materials relative to the total fair value of all the performance obligations in the arrangement with the student. When control of the materials passes to the student in advance of the term of enrollment, an unbilled receivable and related revenue is recorded. Following adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, the balance of unbilled receivables related to such materials was $1.1 million as of December 31, 2018, and is included in tuition receivable. 

5.     Restructuring and Related Charges

 

In October 2013, the Company implemented a restructuring to better align the Company’s resources with student enrollments at the time. This restructuring included the closing of 20 physical locations and reductions in the number of campus-based and corporate employees. A liability for lease obligations, some of which continue through 2022, was recorded and is measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow approach encompassing significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The estimation of future cash flows includes non-cancelable contractual lease costs over the remaining

82


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

terms of the leases discounted at the Company’s marginal borrowing rate of 4.5%, partially offset by estimated future sublease rental income discounted at credit-adjusted rates. The Company’s estimates, which involve significant judgment, also consider the amount and timing of sublease rental income based on subleases that have been executed and subleases expected to be executed based on current commercial real estate market data and conditions, and other qualitative factors specific to the facilities. The estimates are subject to adjustment as market conditions change or as new information becomes available, including the execution of additional sublease agreements.

 

In 2017 and 2018, the Company incurred personnel related restructuring charges due to cost reduction efforts and management changes. These changes are primarily intended to integrate CEC successfully and establish an efficient ongoing cost structure for the Company. 

94


Table of Contents

The following details the changes in the Company’s restructuring liability for lease and related costs during the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

Balance at beginning of period(1)

 

$

27,283

 

$

20,055

 

$

11,985

 

Adjustments(2)

 

 

526

 

 

(1,632)

 

 

419

 

Payments

 

 

(7,754)

 

 

(6,438)

 

 

(3,623)

 

Balance at end of period(1)

 

$

20,055

 

$

11,985

 

$

8,781

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease and Related Costs, Net

 

Severance and Other Employee Separation Costs

 

Total

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

20,055

 

$

 —

 

$

20,055

    Restructuring and other charges(2)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

    Payments

 

 

(6,438)

 

 

 —

 

 

(6,438)

    Adjustments(3)

 

 

(1,632)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,632)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

11,985

 

 

 —

 

 

11,985

    Restructuring and other charges(2)

 

 

 —

 

 

3,414

 

 

3,414

    Payments

 

 

(3,623)

 

 

(3,414)

 

 

(7,037)

    Adjustments(3)

 

 

419

 

 

 —

 

 

419

Balance at December 31, 2017(1)

 

 

8,781

 

 

 —

 

 

8,781

    Restructuring and other charges(2)

 

 

 —

 

 

16,319

 

 

16,319

    Payments

 

 

(2,684)

 

 

(1,972)

 

 

(4,656)

    Adjustments(3)

 

 

443

 

 

 —

 

 

443

Balance at December 31, 2018(1)

 

$

6,540

 

$

14,347

 

$

20,887


(1)

The current portion of restructuring liabilities was $4.2$3.1 million and $3.1$9.8 million as of December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2017,2018, respectively, which are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses. The long-term portion is included in other long-term liabilities.

(2)

Restructuring and other charges of $3.4 million and $16.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively, are included in Merger costs on the consolidated statements of income. There were no restructuring and other charges in the year ended December 31, 2016.

(3)

Adjustments include accretion of interest on lease costs, partially offset by changes in the timing and expected income from sublease agreements.

 

 

5.6.     Marketable Securities

The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

Amortized Cost

 

 

Gross Unrealized Gain

 

 

Gross Unrealized (Losses)

 

 

Estimated Fair Value

Corporate debt securities

$

48,202

 

$

12

 

$

(284)

 

$

47,930

Tax-exempt municipal securities

 

22,858

 

 

45

 

 

(34)

 

 

22,869

Variable rate demand notes

 

4,000

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,000

    Total

$

75,060

 

$

57

 

$

(318)

 

$

74,799

The marketable securities were acquired in the merger with CEC; the Company had no holdings of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale as of December 31, 2017. The unrealized gains and losses on the Company’s investments in municipal and corporate debt securities as of December 31, 2018 were caused by changes in market values primarily due to interest rate changes. As of December 31, 2018, the fair value of the Company’s securities which were in an unrealized loss position for a period longer than twelve months was $15.5 million. The Company does not intend to sell these securities, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities prior to the recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity. No other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018.

95


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the maturities of the Company’s marketable securities as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

Due within one year

$

37,121

Due after one year through five years

 

37,678

    Total

$

74,799

Amounts due within one year in the table above included $4.0 million of variable rate demand notes, with contractual maturities ranging from 27 years to 30 years as of December 31, 2018. The variable rate demand notes are floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put options that allow the Company to sell the security at par plus accrued interest on a settlement basis ranging from one day to seven days. The Company has classified these securities based on their effective maturity date, which ranges from one day to nine days from the balance sheet date.

The Company received $16.4 million of proceeds from the maturities of available-for-sale securities during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company did not record any gross realized gains or gross realized losses in net income during the year ended December 31, 2018. Additionally, there were no proceeds from sales of marketable securities prior to maturity during the year ended December 31, 2018.

7.     Property and Equipment

 

The composition of property and equipment as of December 31, 20162017 and 20172018 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Estimated useful

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Estimated useful

 

 

2016

 

2017

 

life (years)

 

 

2017

 

2018

 

life (years)

 

Land

 

$

7,138

 

$

7,138

 

 —

 

 

$

7,138

 

$

7,138

 

 —

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

19,238

 

 

19,304

 

5-40

 

 

 

20,739

 

 

20,883

 

5-40

 

Furniture, equipment, and computer hardware and software

 

 

157,104

 

 

169,613

 

5-10

 

Furniture and office equipment

 

 

76,726

 

 

76,856

 

5-7

 

Computer hardware

 

 

10,970

 

 

13,546

 

3-7

 

Computer software

 

 

80,662

 

 

129,519

 

3-10

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

39,769

 

 

42,906

 

3-10

 

 

 

42,915

 

 

44,215

 

3-10

 

Construction in progress

 

 

7,006

 

 

5,103

 

 

 

 

 

4,914

 

 

8,354

 

 —

 

 

 

230,255

 

 

244,064

 

 

 

 

 

244,064

 

 

300,511

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(157,131)

 

 

(170,301)

 

 

 

 

 

(170,301)

 

 

(177,834)

 

 

 

 

$

73,124

 

$

73,763

 

 

 

 

$

73,763

 

$

122,677

 

 

 

 

Construction in progress includes costs associated with the construction and renovation of campuses and the development of information technology applications. In 20162017 and 2017,2018, the Company recorded leasehold improvements of $0.3$1.2 million and $1.2$0.3 million, respectively, which were reimbursed by lessors as lease incentives. In 20162017 and 2017,2018, the Company wrote off $3.2$5.3 million and $5.3$17.8 million, respectively, in fixed assets that were fully depreciated and no longer in service.

 

8396


 

Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6.8.     Fair Value Measurement

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

 

    

 

 

    

Quoted Prices in

    

Significant

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

for Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Assets/Liabilities

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

2018

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

1,791

 

$

1,791

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

    Marketable securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Corporate debt securities

 

 

48,430

 

 

 —

 

 

48,430

 

 

 —

 

   Tax-exempt municipal securities

 

 

22,869

 

 

 —

 

 

22,869

 

 

 —

 

   Variable rate demand notes

 

 

4,000

 

 

 —

 

 

4,000

 

 

 —

 

Total assets at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

77,090

 

$

1,791

 

$

75,299

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred payments

 

$

4,120

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,120

 

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

    

Significant

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

for Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Assets/Liabilities

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

    

2017

    

(Level 1)

    

(Level 2)

    

(Level 3)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

113

 

$

113

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred payments

 

$

4,514

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

4,514

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

    

Significant

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

for Identical

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Assets/Liabilities

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

    

2016

    

(Level 1)

    

(Level 2)

    

(Level 3)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

5,103

 

$

5,103

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred payments

 

$

11,741

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

11,741

 

 

The Company measures the above items on a recurring basis at fair value as follows:

 

·

Money market funds — Classified in Level 1 is excess cash the Company holds in both taxable and tax-exempt money market funds, andwhich are included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company records any net unrealized gains and losses for changes in fair value as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents held at December 31, 20162017 and 2017,2018, approximate fair value and are not disclosed in the above tables because of the short-term nature of the financial instruments.

·

Marketable securities – Classified in Level 2 and valued using readily available pricing sources for comparable instruments utilizing observable inputs from active markets. The Company does not hold securities in inactive markets.

 

·

Deferred payments — The Company acquired certain assets and entered into deferred payment arrangements with the sellers in transactions that occurred in 2011 and 2016. The deferred payments are classified within Level 3 as there is no liquid market for similarly priced instruments and are valued using models that encompass significant unobservable inputs to estimate the operating results of the acquired assets. The assumptions used to prepare the discounted cash flows include estimates for interest rates, enrollment growth, retention rates, obtaining regulatory approvals for expansion into new markets, and pricing strategies. These

97


Table of Contents

assumptions are subject to change as the underlying data sources evolve and the programs mature. The short-term portion of deferred payments was $1.3$1.7 million as of December 31, 20172018 and is included in accounts payable and accrued expense.

 

84


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company did not change its valuation techniques associated with recurring fair value measurements from prior periods and did not transfer assets or liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 20162017 or 2017.2018.

 

Changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities during the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 20172018 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

��

    

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2017

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2018

 

Balance as of the beginning of period

 

$

3,278

 

$

11,741

 

$

11,741

 

$

4,514

 

Amounts paid

 

 

(7,358)

 

 

(1,133)

 

 

(1,133)

 

 

(1,412)

 

Contingent consideration in connection with NYCDA acquisition

 

 

14,500

 

 

 —

Other adjustments to fair value

 

 

1,321

 

 

(6,094)

 

 

(6,094)

 

 

1,018

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

11,741

 

$

4,514

 

$

4,514

 

$

4,120

 

 

 

9.     Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The following table presents changes in the carrying value of goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Strayer University

 

Capella University

 

Non-Degree Programs

 

Total

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

$

6,800

 

$

 —

 

$

13,944

 

$

20,744

    Additions

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

    Impairments

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

    Adjustments

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

 

6,800

 

 

 —

 

 

13,944

 

 

20,744

    Additions

 

 

330,581

 

 

393,348

 

 

 —

 

 

723,929

    Impairments

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(13,944)

 

 

(13,944)

    Adjustments

 

 

 —

 

 

1,811

 

 

 —

 

 

1,811

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

$

337,381

 

$

395,159

 

$

 —

 

$

732,540

The additions to goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2018 were due to the acquisition of CEC described in Note 3.

7.The Company assesses goodwill at least annually for impairment during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the respective reporting unit below its carrying amount. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a $13.9 million goodwill impairment charge related to its NYCDA reporting unit (which, following the merger, is included in the Non-Degree Programs segment). The goodwill impairment charge represents the excess of the carrying value of the net assets of the NYCDA reporting unit over its estimated fair value and is reflected within the Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets line in the consolidated statements of income. 

During the second and third quarters of 2018, the Company determined that the rate of growth reflected in the actual operating results of its NYCDA reporting unit, in relation to the prior impairment assessments, in addition to information and insights obtained through an operational and brand rationalization process following the CEC merger, represented triggering events which warranted interim goodwill impairment re-assessments. In accordance with ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), the Company elected to bypass a qualitative impairment assessment over goodwill and proceeded directly to performing quantitative impairment assessments as of these interim assessment dates. Based on the results of the quantitative interim

98


Table of Contents

impairment assessments performed, the Company recorded a $2.8 million and $11.1 million goodwill impairment charge during the second and third quarters of 2018, respectively, related to its NYCDA reporting unit.

The Company used an income-based approach to determine the fair value of NYCDA in its interim goodwill impairment assessments. The income approach consisted of a discounted cash flow model that included projections of future cash flows for NYCDA, calculating a terminal value, and discounting such cash flows by a risk-adjusted rate of return. The determination of fair value consists of using unobservable inputs under the fair value measurement standards.

The Company believes that the most critical assumptions and estimates used in determining the estimated fair value of the NYCDA reporting unit include, but are not limited to, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows, the discount rate, and the terminal growth rate. The assumptions used in determining the expected future cash flows consider various factors such as historical operating trends, particularly in student enrollment and pricing, anticipated economic and regulatory conditions, reasonable expectations for planned business expansion opportunities, and long-term operating strategies and initiatives. The discount rate is based on the Company's assumption of a prudent investor's required rate of return for assuming the risk of investing in a particular company. The terminal growth rate reflects the sustainable operating income a reporting unit could generate in a perpetual state as a function of revenue growth, inflation, and future margin expectations. The Company also believes that these assumptions are consistent with a reasonable market participant view while employing the concept of highest and best use of the asset.

During the fourth quarter, the Company performed its annual impairment testing of goodwill assigned to its Strayer University and Capella University reporting units. The Company first evaluated the likelihood of impairment by considering qualitative factors relevant to the reporting units, such as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, and any other factors that have a significant bearing on fair value. Based on the results of its qualitative impairment analysis, the Company determined that no impairment indicators existed for the Strayer and Capella reporting units as of the assessment date. As such, no goodwill impairment charges were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018.

There were no goodwill impairment charges recorded during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017.

Intangible Assets

The following table represents the balance of the Company’s intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,2017

 

December 31,2018

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Net

Subject to amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Student relationships

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

166,000

 

$

(23,056)

 

$

142,944

Not subject to amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Trade names

 

 

7,260

 

 

 —

 

 

7,260

 

 

185,400

 

 

 —

 

 

185,400

         Total

 

$

7,260

 

$

 —

 

$

7,260

 

$

351,400

 

$

(23,056)

 

$

328,344

The Company’s finite-lived intangible assets are comprised of student relationships, which were recorded in connection with the CEC merger. The student relationships intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a three-year useful life. The Company had no finite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2017.

Straight-line amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets reflects the pattern in which the assets' economic benefits are consumed over their estimated useful lives. Amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets was $23.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

99


Table of Contents

The following table presents future amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

2019

$

55,333

2020

 

55,333

2021

 

32,278

2022

 

 —

2023

 

 —

2024 and thereafter

 

 —

    Total

$

142,944

Indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization consist of trade names. The Company assigned an indefinite useful life to its trade name intangible assets, as it is believed these assets have the ability to generate cash flows indefinitely. In addition, there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, economic, or other factors to limit the useful life of the trade name intangibles.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed at least annually for impairment during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the respective reporting unit below its carrying amount.

During the second and third quarters of 2018, the Company determined that the rate of growth reflected in the actual operating results of its NYCDA reporting unit, in relation to the prior impairment assessments, in addition to information and insights obtained through an operational and brand rationalization process following the CEC merger, represented triggering events which warranted interim goodwill impairment reassessments. Accordingly, the Company performed a quantitative indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessment as of these assessment dates, using an income-based approach to determine fair value. 

The income approach consisted of a discounted cash flow model, using the relief from royalty method, which included a projection of future revenues for NYCDA, identifying a royalty rate, calculating a terminal value, and discounting such cash flows by a risk adjusted rate of return. The determination of fair value of the NYCDA trade name primarily consists of using unobservable inputs under the fair value measurement standards.

The Company believes that the most critical assumptions and estimates used in determining the estimated fair value of the NYCDA trade name include, but are not limited to, the amounts and timing of expected future revenues, the royalty rate, the discount rate, and the terminal growth rate. The assumptions used in determining the expected future revenues consider various factors such as historical operating trends, particularly in student enrollment and pricing, anticipated economic and regulatory conditions, reasonable expectations for planned business expansion opportunities, and long-term operating strategies and initiatives. The royalty rate is based on the Company’s assumption of what a reasonable market participant would pay to license the NYCDA trade name, expressed as a percentage of revenues. The discount rate is based on the Company's assumption of a prudent investor's required rate of return for assuming the risk of investing in a particular company. The terminal growth rate reflects the sustainable revenue growth the business could generate in a perpetual state as a function of inflationary expectations. The Company believes that the assumptions used in the indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests are consistent with a reasonable market participant view while employing the concept of highest and best use of the asset.

Based on the results of the quantitative interim impairment assessments performed, the Company recorded a $3.4 million and $2.0 million indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charge related to its NYCDA trade name (which, following the merger, is included in the Non-Degree Programs segment) during the second and third quarters of 2018, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2018 following the CEC merger, the Company impaired the remaining $0.3 million NYCDA trade name balance related to the decision to stop teaching on-ground courses in early 2019.  The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charge represents the excess of the carrying value of the NYCDA trade name over its estimated fair value and is reflected within the Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets line in the consolidated statements of income. 

100


Table of Contents

During the fourth quarter, the Company performed its annual impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company first evaluated the likelihood of impairment by considering qualitative factors, such as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, and any other factors that have a significant bearing on fair value. Based on the results of its qualitative impairment analysis, the Company determined that no impairment indicators existed for the indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the assessment date. As such, no intangible asset impairment charges, other than the NYCDA trade name impairment discussed above, were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018.

There were no indefinite-lived impairment charges recorded during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017.

10.    Long Term Debt

 

On August 1, 2018, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement and Amendment to Other Loan Documents (the “Second Amendment), which Second Amendment amends the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2012 (as amended by the First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2015, the “Prior Credit Facility”, and the Prior Credit Facility as amended by the Second Amendment, the “Amended Credit Facility”), among the Company, entered into an amendedcertain of its subsidiaries party thereto as subsidiary guarantors, SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”), and the other lenders party thereto. The Amended Credit Facility provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Amended Credit Facility”“Revolver”) which provides for a revolving linein an aggregate principal amount of credit (the “Revolver”) up to $150 $250 million and provides the Company with an option, under certain conditions, to increase the commitments under the Revolver or establish one or more incremental term loans (each, an “Incremental Facility”) in an amount up to $50 the sum of (x) $150 million and (y) if such Incremental Facility is incurred in connection with a permitted acquisition, any amount so long as the aggregate in the future.Company’s leverage ratio (calculated on a trailing four-quarter basis) on a pro forma basis will be no greater than 1.75:1.00. The maturity date of the Amended Credit Facility is July 2, 2020. August 1, 2023. The Amended Credit Facility replaced the Company’s prior credit agreement (the “PriorPrior Credit Agreement”), dated November 8, 2012,Facility, which had provided, among other things, for both a term loan and$150 million senior secured revolving line of credit andfacility with an original maturity date of December 31, 2016. All amounts outstanding under the Prior Credit Agreement were repaid upon execution of the Amended Credit Facility.July 2, 2020. The Company paidcapitalized approximately $0.9$1.2 million in debt financing costs associated with the Amended Credit Facility.Facility, and these costs are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years.

 

Borrowings under the Revolver will bear interest at a per annum rate equal to, at the Company’s election, LIBOR or a base rate, plus a margin ranging from 1.75%1.50% to 2.25%2.00% depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company also is subject to a quarterly unused commitment fee ranging from 0.25%0.20% to 0.35%0.30% per annum depending on the Company’s leverage ratio, times the daily unused amount under the Revolver.

 

All other remaining terms of the Prior Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect. The Amended Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Universityall domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions, and is secured by substantially all of the personal property and assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.subsidiary guarantors. The Amended Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, representations, warranties, events of default, and remedies upon default, including acceleration and rights to foreclose on the collateral securing the Amended Credit Facility. In addition, as with the Prior Credit Agreement, the Amended Credit Facility requires that the Company satisfy certain financial maintenance covenants, including:

 

·

A leverage ratio of not greater than 2 to 1. Leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total debt to trailing four-quarter EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and noncash charges, such as stock-based compensation).

 

·

A coverage ratio of not less than 1.75 to 1. Coverage ratio is defined as the ratio of trailing four-quarter EBITDA and rent expense to trailing four-quarter interest and rent expense.

 

·

A U.S. Department of Education (“Department”) Financial Responsibility Composite Score of not less than 1.5.

 

The Company was in compliance with all the termscovenants of the Amended Credit Facility at December 31, 2017.2018.

 

85101


 

Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2017,2018, the Company paid unused commitment fees of $0.3$0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The Company’s average annual interest rate, including noncash charges forrespectively, on the amortization of debt financing costs, was 4.3% in 2015 duringPrior Credit Facility and the period in which the Company had debt outstanding.Amended Credit Facility. The Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Revolver during 2016, 2017 and as of December 31, 2017.2018.

 

8.11.    Stock Options, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock UnitsEquity Awards

 

On May 5, 2015,November 6, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved the Strategic Education, Inc. 2018 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”), which replaced the Strayer Education, Inc. 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which. The 2018 Plan provides for the granting of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options intended to qualify as incentive stock options, options that do not qualify as incentive stock options, and other forms of equity compensation and performance-based awards to employees, officers, and directors of the Company, or to a consultant or advisor to the Company, at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Vesting provisions are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Options may be granted at option prices based at or above the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. The maximum term of the awards granted under the 20152018 Plan is ten years. The number of shares of common stock reservedauthorized for issuance under the 20152018 Plan is 500,000 authorized but unissued shares,700,000, plus the number of shares available for grant under the Company’s previously existing equity compensation plans2015 Plan at the time of stockholder approval of the 20152018 Plan, plus the number of shares which may in the future become available under any previously existing equity compensation planthe 2015 Plan due to forfeitures of outstanding awards.

 

In February 2017,As of December 31, 2018, no awards are issued or outstanding under the Company’s Board of Directors approved grants of 67,599 shares of restricted stock to certain employees. These shares, which vest over a four-year period, were granted pursuant to2018 Plan. The Company has issued and outstanding awards under the 2015 Plan. The Company’s stock price closed at $81.66 onPlan, the date of these grants.

In May 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved grants of 7,541 shares of restricted stock. These shares, which vest annually over a three-year period, were awarded to non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors, as part of the Company’s annual director compensation programCapella Education Company 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, and the 2015 Plan. The Company’s stock price closed at $86.83 onCapella Education Company 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (collectively, the date of these grants.“Prior Plans”).

 

Dividends paid on unvested restricted stock are reimbursed to the Company, and dividend equivalents accumulated on unvested restricted stock units are forfeited, if the recipient forfeits his or her shares as a result of termination of employment prior to vesting in the award, other than as a result of the recipient’s death, disability, or certain qualifying terminations in connection with a change in control of the Company, or unless waived by the Company.

 

86


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

 

The table below sets forth the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017:2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number of
shares or units

    

Weighted-
average
Grant price

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

634,327

 

$

104.66

 

Grants

 

188,737

 

 

50.63

 

Vested shares

 

(23,539)

 

 

50.43

 

Forfeitures

 

(72,425)

 

 

62.41

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

727,100

 

$

97.53

 

Grants

 

75,140

 

 

82.18

 

Vested shares

 

(84,908)

 

 

66.60

 

Forfeitures

 

(1,204)

 

 

62.28

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

716,128

 

$

99.65

 

Grants

 

159,005

 

 

93.30

 

Awards assumed through acquisition of CEC

 

136,324

 

 

118.29

 

Vested shares

 

(236,164)

 

 

76.78

 

Forfeitures

 

(37,343)

 

 

83.69

 

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

737,950

 

$

114.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number of
shares or unit

    

Weighted-
average
Grant price

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

524,216

 

$

115.67

 

Grants

 

126,655

 

 

61.00

 

Vested shares

 

(13,725)

 

 

52.94

 

Forfeitures

 

(2,819)

 

 

115.55

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

634,327

 

$

104.66

 

Grants

 

188,737

 

 

50.63

 

Vested shares

 

(23,539)

 

 

50.43

 

Forfeitures

 

(72,425)

 

 

62.41

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

727,100

 

$

97.53

 

Grants

 

75,140

 

 

82.18

 

Vested shares

 

(84,908)

 

 

66.60

 

Forfeitures

 

(1,204)

 

 

62.28

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

716,128

 

$

99.65

 

102


 

Table of Contents

Stock Options

 

The table below sets forth the stock option activity and other stock option information for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017:2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

Weighted-

    

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

Weighted-

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

remaining

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

remaining

 

Aggregate

 

 

Number of

 

average

 

contractual

 

intrinsic value(1)

 

 

Number of

 

average

 

contractual

 

intrinsic value(1)

 

    

shares

    

exercise price

    

life (years)

    

(in thousands)

 

    

shares

    

exercise price

    

life (years)

    

(in thousands)

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

6.0

 

$

2,233

 

Grants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercises

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeitures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

5.1

 

$

817

 

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

5.1

 

$

817

 

Grants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercises

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeitures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

4.1

 

$

2,868

 

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

4.1

 

$

2,868

 

Grants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercises

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeitures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

3.1

 

$

3,763

 

Grants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Awards assumed through acquisition of CEC

 

319,846

 

 

66.98

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercises

 

(162,831)

 

 

58.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeitures/Expirations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(769)

 

 

51.96

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

3.1

 

$

3,763

 

Exercisable, December 31, 2017

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

3.1

 

$

3,763

 

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

256,246

 

$

66.80

 

7.0

 

$

11,947

 

Exercisable, December 31, 2018

 

108,317

 

$

65.00

 

6.4

 

$

5,245

 


(1)

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the respective trading day and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holder had all options been exercised on the respective trading day. The amount of intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock.

 

87


TableThe Company received $8.6 million of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The number of shares exercisable as ofnet cash proceeds related to stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2015,2018. The aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options exercised during this period was $11.3 million. No stock options were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 are as follows:2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number of

    

Weighted-average

 

 

 

Shares

 

exercise price

 

Exercisable, December 31, 2015

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

Exercisable, December 31, 2016

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

Exercisable, December 31, 2017

 

100,000

 

$

51.95

 

 

Valuation and Expense Information under Stock Compensation Topic ASC 718

 

At December 31, 2017,2018, total stock-based compensation cost which has not yet been recognized was $17.9$17.8 million for unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock option awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over the next 2128 months on a weighted-average basis. Awards of approximately 561,000530,000 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units are subject to performance conditions. The accrual for stock-based compensation for performance awards is based on the Company’s estimates that such performance criteria are probable of being achieved over the respective vesting periods. Such a determination involves judgment surrounding the Company’s ability to maintain regulatory compliance. If the performance targets are not reached during the respective vesting period, or it is determined it is more likely than not that the performance criteria will not be achieved, related compensation expense is adjusted.Restricted stock unit awards of approximately 9,100 shares are required to be settled in cash upon vesting, and are classified as accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. The value of these awards is marked to market each period based on the fair value of the Company's common stock at the end of the reporting period, and changes in fair value are recorded in earnings.

 

103


Table of Contents

The following table sets forthreflects the amount of stock-based compensation expense recorded in each of the expense line items for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 20172018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

 

Instruction and educational support

 

$

2,134

 

$

1,432

 

$

1,943

 

 

$

1,432

 

$

1,943

 

$

2,572

 

Marketing

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

585

 

Admissions advisory

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

16

 

General and administration

 

 

8,079

 

 

9,335

 

 

9,684

 

 

 

9,335

 

 

9,684

 

 

10,117

 

Merger costs

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,242

 

Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expense

 

 

10,213

 

 

10,767

 

 

11,627

 

 

 

10,767

 

 

11,627

 

 

15,532

 

Tax benefit

 

 

4,032

 

 

4,256

 

 

4,593

 

 

 

4,256

 

 

4,593

 

 

3,922

 

Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

 

$

6,181

 

$

6,511

 

$

7,034

 

 

$

6,511

 

$

7,034

 

$

11,610

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized a tax shortfall related to share-based payment arrangements of approximately $0.1 million, which was recorded as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, the Company recognized a tax windfallwindfalls related to share-based payment arrangements of approximately $0.6 million and $3.5 million, respectively, which was recorded as an adjustmentwere adjustments to the provision (benefit) for income taxes following the adoption of ASU 2016-09. No stock options were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2017.taxes. 

The following table summarizes information regarding share-based payment arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

Proceeds from stock options exercised

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Tax (shortfall) windfall related to share-based payment arrangements

 

$

(24)

 

$

(51)

 

$

562

 

Intrinsic value of stock options exercised

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

88


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

9.12.   Other Long-Term Liabilities

 

Other long-term liabilities consist of the following as of December 31, 20162017 and 20172018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

    

2017

 

2017

    

2018

Deferred revenue, net of current portion

 

$

17,981

 

$

21,033

Contract liabilities, net of current portion

 

$

21,033

 

$

23,880

Deferred rent and other facility costs

 

 

8,251

 

 

7,113

 

 

7,113

 

 

6,837

Employee separation costs

 

 

 —

 

 

6,800

Deferred payments related to acquisitions

 

 

13,754

 

 

6,385

 

 

6,385

 

 

5,904

Loss on facilities not in use

 

 

7,813

 

 

5,652

 

 

5,652

 

 

4,332

Lease incentives

 

 

2,684

 

 

2,832

 

 

2,832

 

 

2,300

Other

 

 

 —

 

 

1,263

Other long-term liabilities

 

$

50,483

 

$

43,015

 

$

43,015

 

$

51,316

 

Deferred RevenueContract Liabilities

 

TheAs discussed in Note 4, in connection with its student tuition contracts, the Company provides for certain scholarship and awards programs, such as the Graduation Fund (see Note 2 for additional information), that can be redeemedhas an obligation to provide free classes in the future by students after meetingshould certain eligibility requirements. The Company also has licensed certain of its non-credit bearing course content to a third party.conditions be maintained (the Graduation Fund). Long-term deferred revenue representscontract liabilities represent the amount of revenue under these arrangements that the Company expects will be realized after one year.

Employee Separation Costs

Severance and other employee separation costs to be paid after one year.

 

Deferred Rent and Other Facility Costs and Loss on Facilities Not in Use

 

The Company records a liability for lease costs of campusescampus and non-campus facilities that are not currently in use (see Note 4)5). For facilities still in use, the Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the initial term of a lease. The difference between the rent payment and the straight-line rent expense is recorded as a liability.

 

Deferred Payments Related to Acquisitions

 

In the first quarter of 2016, the Company acquired NYCDA and entered into deferred payment arrangements with the sellers in connection with this transaction. In April and August 2016, NYCDA received state regulatory permits and the Company subsequently paid $6.0 million and $0.5 million of deferred payments to the sellers, respectively. The fair value of the deferred payment arrangements at December  31, 2017 is zero, and the maximum possible amount that could be paid is $11.5 million. See Note 3 for further information on the NYCDA deferred payments.

In 2011,previous acquisitions, the Company acquired certain assets and entered into deferred payment arrangements with the sellers. The deferred payment arrangements are valued at approximately $3.4$3.6 million and $3.6 $3.1 

104


Table of Contents

million as of December 31, 20162017 and 2017,2018, respectively. In addition, one of the sellers contributed $2.8 million to the Company representing the seller’s continuing interest in the assets acquired.

 

Lease Incentives

 

In conjunction with the opening of new campuses or renovating existing ones, the Company, in some instances, was reimbursed by the lessors for improvements made to the leased properties. In accordance with ASC 840-20, the underlying assets were capitalized as leasehold improvements and a liability was established for the reimbursements. The leasehold improvements and the liability are amortized on a straight-line basis over the corresponding lease terms, which generally range from five to ten years.

 

10.13.    Other Employee Benefit Plans

 

The Company has asponsors the Strayer Education, Inc. 401(k) plan coveringPlan and the Capella Education Company Retirement Savings Plan which, collectively, cover all eligible employees of the Company. Effective January 1, 2018,2019, participants under both plans may contribute up to $18,500$19,000 of their base compensation annually. Employeeannually and employee contributions under both plans are voluntary. Discretionary contributions were made by the Company to participants of the Strayer Education, Inc. 401(k) Plan matching 50% of employee deferrals up to a maximum of 3% of

89


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

the employee’s annual salary. Under the Capella Education Company Retirement Savings Plan, the Company matches 100% on the first 2%, and 50% on the next 4%, of the employee contributions. The Company’s contributions which vest immediately,to these plans totaled $1.1 million, $1.1$1.3 million and $1.3$3.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2017,2018, respectively.

 

In May 1998, the Company adopted the Strayer Education, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). Under the ESPP, eligible employees may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain limitations, at 90% of its market value at the date of purchase. Purchases are limited to 10% of an employee’s eligible compensation. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be made available for purchase by participating employees under the ESPP is 2,500,000 shares. Shares purchased in the open market for employees for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 20172018 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Shares

    

Average price

 

    

Shares

    

Average price

 

 

purchased

 

per share

 

 

purchased

 

per share

 

2015

 

5,136

 

$

49.10

 

2016

 

4,988

 

$

46.46

 

 

4,988

 

$

46.46

 

2017

 

4,718

 

$

77.05

 

 

4,718

 

$

77.05

 

2018

 

4,647

 

$

100.34

 

 

 

11.14.   Stock Repurchase Plan

 

In November 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to an aggregate of $15 million in value of common stock in open market purchases from time to time at the discretion of the Company’s management depending on market conditions and other corporate considerations. The Company’s Board of Directors amended the program on various dates, increasing the repurchase amount authorized and extending the expiration date. At December 31, 2017,2018,  $70 million of the Company’s share repurchase authorization was remaining for repurchases through December 31, 2018.2019. All of the Company’s share repurchases were effected in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This stock repurchase plan may be modified, suspended, or terminated at any time by the Company without notice.

 

Repurchases of common stock are recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. To the extent additional paid-in capital had been reduced to zero through stock repurchases, retained earnings was then reduced. No shares were repurchased during each of the three years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2017,2018, and the Company has $70.0 million available for future repurchases.

 

105


Table of Contents

12.15.   Commitments and Contingencies

 

The University participatesUniversities participate in various federal student financial assistance programs which are subject to audit by agencies, including the Department of Education, the Veterans Administration, and the Department of Defense. Management believes that the potential effects of audit adjustments, if any, for the periods currently under audit will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

As of December 31, 2017,2018, the Company had 8187 long-term, non-cancelable operating leases for campuses and other administrative facilities. Rent expense was $37.5 million, $33.7 million, $33.6 million, and $33.6$35.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2017,2018, respectively. Rent expense for 2016 includes a benefit of approximately $1.9 million, and rent expense for both 2017 and 2018 includes a charge of approximately $0.3 million in each year to reduceadjust the Company’s liability for losses on facilities no longer in use. The rents on most of the Company’s leases are subject to annual increases.

 

90


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The minimum rental commitments for the Company as of December 31, 20172018 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Minimum

 

    

Minimum

 

 

rental

 

 

rental

 

 

commitments

 

 

commitments

 

2018

 

$

31,522

 

2019

 

 

26,851

 

 

$

33,600

 

2020

 

 

21,894

 

 

 

28,399

 

2021

 

 

16,797

 

 

 

23,485

 

2022

 

 

7,319

 

 

 

13,770

 

2023

 

 

10,316

 

Thereafter

 

 

10,258

 

 

 

32,745

 

Total

 

$

114,641

 

 

$

142,315

 

 

 

13.16.  Income Taxes

 

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Act”) was signed into law, making a broad range of tax reform legislation affecting businesses, including, loweringreducing the corporate tax rates, among other provisions. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, changes inrate from 35% to 21% for tax rates and tax law are accounted for in the period of enactment.years beginning after December 31, 2017. The company recognized the income tax effects of the 2017 Act in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 which provides SEC staff guidance for the application of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, in the reporting period in which the 2017 Act was signed into law. As such, the Company’s financial results reflect the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act for which the accounting under ASC Topic 740 is complete. The Company did not identify items for which the income tax effects of the 2017 Act have not been completed and a reasonable estimate could not be determined as of December 31, 2017.

The 2017 Act reduces the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. ASC 740 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be valued using enacted tax rates in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Thus, the Company revalued its federal deferred taxestax assets based upon the new 21% tax rate which resulted in an $11.4 million provisional charge recorded to income tax expense during the year ended December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has now completed the accounting for all of the enactment-date income tax effects of the 2017 Act. During 2018, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $1.2 million related to adjustments to the provision during the three months endedprovisional amount recorded as of December 31, 2017.

 

The 2017 Act also allows for immediate full expensing for property placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before January 1, 2023. The Company has made the election to accelerate these deductions for the year ended December 31, 2017 tax returns. At this time, it is uncertain which states will follow federal rules regarding accelerated depreciation and as such, the Company has not been able to make a reasonable estimate on the impact of deferred taxes related to state depreciation and continue to account for this based on the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect prior to enactment. In addition, the 2017 Act places limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation awards in the future, although the Company’s existing awards remain eligible for deductibility pursuant to the 2017 Act. The Company is still analyzing the 2017 Act and refining its calculations, which could potentially impact the measurement of the Company’s tax balances.future.

 

91106


 

Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 20172018 is summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

 

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

25,515

 

$

26,015

 

$

21,156

 

 

$

26,015

 

$

21,156

 

$

9,069

 

State

 

 

4,538

 

 

4,869

 

 

4,477

 

 

 

4,869

 

 

4,477

 

 

3,785

 

Total current

 

 

30,053

 

 

30,884

 

 

25,633

 

 

 

30,884

 

 

25,633

 

 

12,854

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in federal tax rate due to the 2017 Act

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

11,375

 

 

 

 —

 

 

11,375

 

 

 —

 

Federal

 

 

(3,634)

 

 

(7,748)

 

 

(3,193)

 

 

 

(7,748)

 

 

(3,193)

 

 

(13,381)

 

State

 

 

(311)

 

 

(646)

 

 

(1,781)

 

 

 

(646)

 

 

(1,781)

 

 

(2,941)

 

Total deferred

 

 

(3,945)

 

 

(8,394)

 

 

6,401

 

 

 

(8,394)

 

 

6,401

 

 

(16,322)

 

Total provision for income taxes

 

$

26,108

 

$

22,490

 

$

32,034

 

Total provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

$

22,490

 

$

32,034

 

$

(3,468)

 

 

The tax effects of the principal temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax assetsasset (liability) are as follows as of December 31, 20162017 and 20172018 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2016

    

2017

 

    

2017

    

2018

 

Stock-based compensation

 

$

20,477

 

$

15,024

 

 

$

15,024

 

$

19,834

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

3,250

 

 

7,943

 

Contract liabilities

 

 

5,445

 

 

6,107

 

Capital loss carryforward

 

 

 —

 

 

4,174

 

Other

 

 

1,217

 

 

3,650

 

Other facility-related costs

 

 

2,622

 

 

2,080

 

Deferred leasing costs

 

 

1,789

 

 

1,673

 

Intangible assets

 

 

(1,196)

 

 

(82,022)

 

Property and equipment

 

 

(6,059)

 

 

(3,326)

 

 

 

(3,326)

 

 

(18,441)

 

Other facility-related costs

 

 

5,242

 

 

2,622

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

7,182

 

 

5,445

 

Tuition receivable

 

 

3,922

 

 

 —

 

Deferred leasing costs

 

 

3,064

 

 

1,789

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

 —

 

 

(4,356)

 

Prepaid compensation

 

 

(1,139)

 

 

(373)

 

 

 

(373)

 

 

 —

 

Other

 

 

(1,592)

 

 

3,271

 

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

31,097

 

$

24,452

 

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

 

$

24,452

 

$

(59,358)

 

 

The Company had no unrecognizedvaluation allowance for deferred tax benefitsassets as of December 31, 2017. 2017 and 2018 was $0 and $4.4 million, respectively. The increase in the valuation allowance was primarily related to capital loss carryforwards acquired in the merger with CEC. The Company concluded that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax asset for the capital loss carryforward would not be realized due to a lack of history of recognizing capital gains.

As of December 31, 2016,2017 and 2018, the Company’s liabilityliabilities for unrecognized tax benefits wasare included in income taxes payableother long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.sheets. Interest and penalties, including those related to uncertain tax positions, are included in the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of income. The Company recognized $0.1$0.2 million  and $0.2 million$12,000 of expense related to interest and penalties in 20162017 and 2017,2018, respectively. The total amount of interest and penalties included in the consolidated balance sheetsheets was $0.1 million$0 and $36,000 as of December 31, 2016.2017 and 2018, respectively. 

 

The following table summarizes changes in unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, for the respective periods (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2017

 

    

2017

    

2018

 

Beginning unrecognized tax benefits

 

$

505

 

$

176

 

 

$

176

 

$

 —

 

Additions from merger

 

 

 —

 

 

687

 

Reductions for tax positions taken in prior years

 

 

(329)

 

 

(176)

 

 

 

(176)

 

 

(63)

 

Ending unrecognized tax benefits

 

$

176

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 —

 

$

624

 

 

92107


 

Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company does not anticipate significant changes to unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2018, $0.6 million of the Company’s total unrecognized tax benefits would favorably affect the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized.

A reconciliation between the Company’s statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 20172018 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2015

    

 

2016

    

 

2017

 

 

    

2016

    

 

2017

    

 

2018

 

 

Statutory federal rate

 

35.0

%

 

35.0

%

 

35.0

%

 

 

35.0

%

 

35.0

%

 

21.0

%

 

State income taxes, net of federal benefits

 

4.2

 

 

4.5

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

4.5

 

4.2

 

 

(1.4)

 

Adjustment to deferred tax assets as a result of the 2017 Act

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

21.8

 

 

 

 —

 

21.8

 

 

 —

 

Transaction costs

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

 —

 

5.2

 

 

(6.2)

 

Adjustments to contingent consideration

 

 —

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

(5.0)

 

 

 

(0.3)

 

(5.0)

 

 

 —

 

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

15.5

 

Impairment of intangible assets

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(15.3)

 

Acceleration of deductions due to change in tax law

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

6.4

 

Other

 

0.3

 

 

0.1

 

 

(0.4)

 

 

 

0.1

 

(0.4)

 

 

(1.9)

 

Effective tax rate

 

39.5

%

 

39.3

%

 

60.8

%

 

 

39.3

%

 

60.8

%

 

18.1

%

 

 

Cash payments for income taxes were $28.5 million, $31.6 million, and $26.2 million, and $13.4 million in 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2017,2018, respectively.

 

17. Other Investments

14.At December 31, 2018, the Company held $13.4 million in investments in certain limited partnerships that invest in various innovative companies in the health care and education-related technology fields. The Company has commitments to invest up to an additional $2.0 million across these partnerships through December 2027. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company made investments totaling $0.7 million in the partnerships. The Company's investments range from 3%-5% of any partnership’s interest and are accounted for under the equity method. The Company had no holdings of these other investments as of December 31, 2017.

18.   Segment Reporting

Strategic Education is an educational services company that provides access to high-quality education through campus-based and online post-secondary education offerings, as well as through programs to develop job-ready skills for high-demand markets. Strategic Education’s portfolio of companies is dedicated to closing the skills gap by placing adults on the most direct path between learning and employment.

Two of the Company’s operating segments that meet the quantitative thresholds to qualify as reportable segments are the Strayer University and Capella University segments. The Strayer University segment is comprised of Strayer University, including its programs offered through the the Jack Welch Management Institute; the Capella University segment consists of Capella University. None of the Company’s other operating segments individually meet the quantitative thresholds to qualify as reportable segments; therefore, these other operating segments are combined and presented below as Non-Degree Programs. The Non-Degree Programs reportable segment is comprised of the DevMountain, LLC (“DevMountain”), Hackbright Academy, Inc. (“Hackbright”), NYCDA, and Sophia Learning, LLC businesses.

Revenue and operating expenses are generally directly attributable to the segments. Inter-segment revenues are not presented separately, as these amounts are immaterial. The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker does not evaluate operating segments using asset information.

108


Table of Contents

A summary of financial information by reportable segment (in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018 is presented in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Strayer University

 

$

435,153

 

$

449,547

 

$

471,104

    Capella University

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

154,918

    Non-Degree Programs

 

 

5,935

 

 

5,304

 

 

8,163

Consolidated revenues

 

$

441,088

 

$

454,851

 

$

634,185

Income (loss) from operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Strayer University

 

$

67,991

 

$

64,801

 

$

68,188

    Capella University

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6,340

    Non-Degree Programs

 

 

(13,732)

 

 

(8,225)

 

 

(5,920)

    Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(25,694)

    Merger costs

 

 

 —

 

 

(11,879)

 

 

(45,745)

    Fair value adjustments and impairment of intangible assets

 

 

3,213

 

 

7,512

 

 

(19,909)

Consolidated income (loss) from operations

 

$

57,472

 

$

52,209

 

$

(22,740)

The following table presents a schedule of significant non-cash items included in segment income (loss) from operations by reportable segment (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Strayer University

 

$

17,380

 

$

18,268

 

$

19,997

    Capella University

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,382

    Non-Degree Programs

 

 

437

 

 

465

 

 

741

    Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

25,694

    Merger costs

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

729

Consolidated depreciation and amortization

 

$

17,817

 

$

18,733

 

$

54,543

Stock-Based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Strayer University

 

$

10,767

 

$

11,627

 

$

11,602

    Capella University

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,495

    Non-Degree Programs

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

193

    Merger costs

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,242

Consolidated stock-based compensation

 

$

10,767

 

$

11,627

 

$

15,532

19.  Summarized Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

Quarterly financial information for 20162017 and 20172018 is as follows (in thousands except per share data):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

2016

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

 

2017

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

 

Revenues

 

$

111,166

 

$

108,487

 

$

102,156

 

$

119,279

 

 

$

114,912

 

$

112,720

 

$

108,512

 

$

118,707

 

Income from operations

 

 

20,092

 

 

12,896

 

 

4,830

 

 

19,654

 

 

 

18,443

 

 

13,854

 

 

8,224

 

 

11,688

 

Net income

 

 

12,420

 

 

7,786

 

 

2,878

 

 

11,718

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

10,578

 

 

10,302

 

 

6,227

 

 

(6,495)

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.17

 

$

0.73

 

$

0.27

 

$

1.10

 

 

$

1.00

 

$

0.96

 

$

0.58

 

$

(0.61)

 

Diluted

 

$

1.15

 

$

0.72

 

$

0.27

 

$

1.07

 

 

$

0.95

 

$

0.92

 

$

0.56

 

$

(0.61)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter

 

2017

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

 

Revenues

 

$

114,912

 

$

112,720

 

$

108,512

 

$

118,707

 

Income from operations

 

 

18,443

 

 

13,854

 

 

8,224

 

 

11,688

 

Net income (loss) 

 

 

10,578

 

 

10,302

 

 

6,227

 

 

(6,495)

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.00

 

$

0.96

 

$

0.58

 

$

(0.61)

 

Diluted

 

$

0.95

 

$

0.92

 

$

0.56

 

$

(0.61)

 

109


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter

 

2018

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

 

Revenues

 

$

116,469

 

$

114,668

 

$

160,945

 

$

242,103

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

 

11,328

 

 

4,184

 

 

(57,127)

 

 

18,875

 

Net income (loss) 

 

 

9,467

 

 

5,188

 

 

(52,781)

 

 

22,455

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.48

 

$

(2.97)

 

$

1.05

 

Diluted

 

$

0.84

 

$

0.46

 

$

(2.97)

 

$

1.02

 

 

 

 

15.20.  Litigation

 

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation and other legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of its business. There are no material pending material legal proceedings, other than routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Company is subject or to which the Company’sits property is subject.

 

16.21.  Regulation

 

Gainful Employment

 

Under the Higher Education Act, a proprietary institution offering programs of study other than a baccalaureate degree in liberal arts (for which there is a limited statutory exception) must prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation. The Department of Education has published final regulations related to gainful employment that went into effect on July 1, 2015, with the exception of new disclosure requirements, which generally went into effect January 1, 2017, althoughbut which have now been delayed, to some portions of those requirements have been delayedextent, until July 1, 2019. Additionally, the Department announced, on June 16, 2017, its intention to conduct negotiated rulemaking proceedings to revise the gainful employment regulations. Those proceedings began in December 2017 and concluded in March 2018.

93


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The negotiating committee did not reach a consensus, and as a result the Department was able to propose its own regulatory language with no obligation to use the language negotiated or agreed upon during the committee meetings.

 

On August 14, 2018, the Department released draft rules which propose to rescind the gainful employment regulations, including sanctions, appeals, and disclosure and certification requirements. The Department indicated its plans to update the College Scorecard, or similar web-based tool, to provide program-level outcomes for all higher education programs at all institutions that participate in the Title IV programs. The Department accepted public comments through September 13, 2018 and the Department has indicated that it is currently drafting final rules. The Company cannot predict what new regulations will ultimately be adopted. 

 

The newcurrent regulations include two debt-to-earnings measures, consisting of an annual income rate and a discretionary income rate. The annual income rate measures student debt in relation to earnings, and the discretionary income rate measures student debt in relation to discretionary income. A program passes if the program’s graduates:

 

·

have an annual income rate that does not exceed 8%; or

 

·

have a discretionary income rate that does not exceed 20%.

 

In addition, a program that does not pass either of the debt-to-earnings metrics and that has an annual income rate between 8% and 12%, or a discretionary income rate between 20% and 30%, is considered to be in a warning zone. A program fails if the program’s graduates have an annual income rate of 12% or greater and a discretionary income rate of 30% or greater. A program would becomebecomes Title IV-ineligible for three years if it fails both metrics for two out of three consecutive years, or fails to pass at least one metric for four consecutive award years. The regulations provide a means by which an institution may challenge the Department of Education’s calculation of any of the debt metrics prior to loss of Title IV eligibility. On January 8, 2017, Strayer University and Capella University received itstheir final 2015 debt-to-earnings measures. None of Strayer’sStrayer University or Capella University programs failed the debt-to-earnings metrics. Two active Strayer University programs, the Associate in Arts in Accounting and Associate in Arts in Business Administration, areand one active Capella University program, the Masters of Science in Marriage and Family

110


Table of Contents

Counseling/Therapy, were “in the zone,” which means each programof those three programs remains fully eligible unless (1) eitherthe program has a combination of zone and failing designations for four consecutive years, in which case it would become Title IV-ineligible in the fifth year; or (2) eitherthe program fails the metrics for two out of three consecutive years, in which case the program could become ineligible for the following award year. The Department has not yet released 2016 debt-to-earnings measures, and the Department has announced that because it no longer has a data-sharing agreement with the U.S. Social Security Administration to receive earnings data, the Department is currently unable to calculate the debt-to-earnings measures under the gainful employment regulations.

 

If an institution is notified by the Secretary of Education that a program could become ineligible, based on its final rates, for the next award year:

 

·

The institution must provide a warning with respect to the program to students and prospective students indicating, among other things, that students may not be able to use Title IV funds to attend or continue in the program; and

 

·

The institution must not enroll, register, or enter into a financial commitment with a prospective student until a specified time after providing the warning to the prospective student.

 

The newcurrent regulation also requires institutions annually to report certain student- and program-level data to the Department of Education, and comply with additional disclosure requirements. Regulations adopted by the Department of Education require an institution to use a template designed by the Department of Education to disclose to prospective students, with respect to each gainful employment program, occupations that the program prepares students to enter, total cost of the program, on-time graduation rate, job placement rate, if applicable, and the median loan debt of program completers for the most recently completed award year. The regulation that became effective July 1, 2015 expanded upon those existing disclosure requirements, and institutions were required to update their disclosure templates by July 1, 2017.2017 and regularly in accordance with subsequent deadlines thereafter.

 

In addition, the current gainful employment regulation requires institutions to certify, among other things, that each eligible gainful employment program is programmatically accredited if programmatic accreditation is required by a federal governmental entity or a state governmental entity of a state in which it is located or in which the institution is otherwise required to obtain state approval.approval to offer the program in that state. Institutions also must certify that each eligible program satisfies the applicable educational prerequisites for professional licensure or certification requirements in each state in which it is located or is otherwise required to obtain state approval, so that a student who completes the program and seeks employment in that state qualifies to take any licensure or certification exam that is needed for the student to practice or find employment in an occupation that the program prepares students to enter. The University hasUniversities have timely made the required certification.

 

Under the gainful employment regulation, an institution may establish a new program’s Title IV eligibility by updating the list of the institution’s programs maintained by the Department of Education. However, an institution may

94


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

not update its list of eligible programs to include a failing or zone program that the institution voluntarily discontinued or became ineligible, or a gainful employment program that is substantially similar to such a program, until three years after the loss of eligibility or discontinuance.

 

The requirements associated with the gainful employment regulations may substantially increase the Company’s administrative burdens and could affect ourthe Universities’ program offerings, student enrollment, persistence, and retention. Further, although the regulations provide opportunities for an institution to correct any potential deficiencies in a program prior to the loss of Title IV eligibility, the continuing eligibility of the Company’s academic programs will be affected by factors beyond management’s control such as changes in the Company’s graduates’ income levels, changes in student borrowing levels, increases in interest rates, changes in the percentage of former students who are current in the repayment of their student loans, and various other factors. Even if the Company were able to correct any deficiency in the gainful employment metrics in a timely manner, the disclosure requirements associated with a program’s failure to meet at least one metric may adversely affect student enrollments in that program and may adversely affect the reputation of the University.

 

111


Table of Contents

The Clery Act

 

Strayer University and Capella University must comply with the campus safety and security reporting requirements as well as other requirements in the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (the “Clery Act”), including changes made to the Clery Act by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013. On October 20, 2014, the Department promulgated regulations, effective July 1, 2015, implementing amendments to the Clery Act. In addition, the Department has interpreted Title IX to categorize sexual violence as a form of prohibited sex discrimination and to require institutions to follow certain disciplinary procedures with respect to such offenses. Failure by Strayer University or Capella University to comply with the Clery Act or Title IX requirements or regulations thereunder could result in action by the Department fining Strayer University or Capella University, or limiting or suspending its participating in Title IV programs, could lead to litigation, and could harm Strayer University or Capella University’s reputation. We believeThe Company believes that Strayer University isand Capella University are in compliance with these requirements.

 

Compliance Reviews

 

Strayer University isand Capella University are subject to announced and unannounced compliance reviews and audits by various external agencies, including the Department of Education, its Office of Inspector General (“ED OIG”), state licensing agencies, guaranty agencies, and accrediting agencies. The Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations also require an institution to submit annually to the Secretary of Education a compliance audit of its administration of Title IV programs conducted by an independent certified public accountant in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards and applicable ED OIG audit guides. For fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2016, the Universities must submit such audits that have been conducted in accordance with a revised guide for audits of proprietary schools that was issued by the ED OIG in September 2016. In addition, to enable the Secretary of Education to make a determination of financial responsibility, an institution must submit annually to the Secretary of Education audited financial statements prepared in accordance with Department of Education regulations. The Department conducted four campus-based program reviews of Strayer University campuses in three states and the District of Columbia, with one on-site review conducted August 18-20, 2014; one on-site review conducted September 8-11, 2014; and two on-site reviews conducted September 22-26, 2014. The reviews covered federal financial aid years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, and two of the reviews also covered compliance with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act, and regulations related thereto. On October 21, 2014, the Department issued an Expedited Final Program Review Determination Letter for one of the program reviews conducted the week of September 22, 2014, closing the program review with no further action required by the University. On November 17, 2014, the University received a Program Review Report for the program review conducted in August 2014, and provided a response to the Department on December 15, 2014. On January 7, 2015, the University received a Final Program Review Determination letter from that review, closing the review with no further action required by the University. On March 24, 2015, the University received a Program Review Report for another program review, and provided a response to the Department on April 21, 2015. On April 29, 2015, the University received a Final Program Review Determination Letter closing the review and identifying a payment of less than $500 due to the Department of Education based on an underpayment on a return to Title IV calculation. The University remitted payment, and received a letter from the Department on May 26, 2015, indicating that no further action was required and that the matter was closed. On September 15, 2015, the University received a Program Review Report for the final program review, and provided a response to the Department on October 5, 2015. On January 5, 2016, the University received a Final Program Review

95


Table of Contents

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Determination Letter for the final program review, indicating that the program review was closed and no further action was required.

Capella University has not undergone a program review for several years.

 

Program Participation Agreement

 

Each institution participating in Title IV programs must enter into a Program Participation Agreement with the Department. Under the agreement, the institution agrees to follow the Department’s rules and regulations governing Title IV programs. On October 11, 2017, the Department and Strayer University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Strayer University’s continued participation in Title IV programs with full certification through June 30, 2021.

17.   Merger with Capella Education Company

On October 29, 2017, the Company entered into a merger agreement with Capella Education Company (“Capella”). Capella provides post-secondary education and job-skills programs primarily through its subsidiary Capella University. The merger was approved by the Company’s shareholders and by Capella’s stockholders on January 19, 2018. Upon consummation of the merger, Capella will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and will continue to offer its education programs through Capella University.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company will issue 0.875 shares of Strayer Common Stock for each issued and outstanding share of Capella Common Stock. Outstanding equity awards held by current Capella employees and certain non-employee directors of Capella will be assumed by the Company and converted into comparable Strayer awards at the exchange ratio. Outstanding equity awards held by Capella non-employee directors who will not serve as directors of Strayer after completion of the merger and by former Capella employees will be settled in connection with the completion of the merger in exchange for cash payments as specified in the merger agreement. Following the merger, Strayer and Capella stockholders are expected to own approximately 52% and 48%,  respectively, of the outstanding combined company shares on a fully diluted basis, based on the number of shares currently expected to be outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger.

Also in connection with the completion of the merger, and as approved by the Company’s shareholders on January 19, 2018, the Company will change its name to Strategic Education, Inc. and increase the number of shares of authorized Common Stock to 32,000,000. The merger is anticipated to close in the third quarter of 2018, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including the receipt of approvals by the Department of Education, state educational regulators, and relevant accreditation bodies.

96112


 

Table of Contents

As a result of the August 1, 2018 merger, Capella University experienced a change of ownership, with the Company as its new owner. On January 18, 2019, consistent with standard procedure upon a Title IV institution’s change of ownership, the Department and Capella University executed a new Program Participation Agreement, approving Capella’s continued participation in Title IV programs with provisional certification through December 31, 2022.

22.   Subsequent Events

In February 2019, to align compensation and benefit plans after completion of the merger with CEC, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors took action to terminate all deferred compensation arrangements, including for employees already participating in such arrangements. These changes affect the tax deductibility of certain arrangements, which will result in an approximately $11.5 million reduction to the Company’s deferred tax asset and an increase to the Company’s future effective tax rates and cash tax payments.

In January 2019, the Higher Learning Commission, Capella University’s accreditor, held its standard focused site visit sixmonths after the change of control. It is expected that HLC will issue its final report in May 2019.

113


Table of Contents

Item 9.      Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures

 

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017.2018. Based upon such review, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company had in place, as of December 31, 2017,2018, effective controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company (including consolidated subsidiaries) in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules thereunder, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

The company completed its acquisition of Capella Education Company on August 1, 2018. As a result, management has excluded this business from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. The total assets of Capella Education Company, excluding the preliminary value of goodwill and acquired intangible assets, that were excluded from the assessment represented approximately 18% of the company's total assets as of December 31, 2018. The total revenues of Capella Education Company that were excluded from the assessment represented approximately 25% of the company's total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Under the supervision, and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2018, based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2018.

 

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172018 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.

 

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

 

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017,2018, and have concluded

114


Table of Contents

that there was no change during such quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B.   Other Information

 

On February 28, 2018, the Company, through its subsidiary Strayer University, LLC, entered into an employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Brian Jones, President of the University.  The Employment Agreement

97


Table of Contents

provides for Mr. Jones’ continued employment as President of the University for a term of three years, which will be extended automatically for additional one year periods unless either party shall give notice of its intent not to renew prior to the expiration of the term.  The Employment Agreement further provides for an annual base salary of $430,000.00, an annual non-equity incentive plan target award at 50% of annual base salary, and an annual target equity share grant of $550,000.00, with a 4-year cliff vesting schedule and applicable performance measures as may be established by the University Board of Trustees and the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Employment Agreement additionally provides for severance benefits to Mr. Jones in the event of a “qualifying termination” (as defined in the Employment Agreement), including (i) a lump-sum severance payment equal to the sum of Mr. Jones’ annual base salary plus annual bonus, pro-rated for the remainder of the term of the agreement; (ii) continuation of medical benefits through the conclusion of the term of the agreement, or in the case of a declaration of a Disability until such time as the Disability has concluded; and (iii) accelerated vesting in full of all outstanding restricted shares.  A “qualifying termination” is defined in the Employment Agreement as (i) a termination of Mr. Jones’ employment by the University without cause; (ii) a termination by Mr. Jones of his employment following a breach of any material provision of the agreement by the University which is not cured within 30 days; (iii) a termination by Mr. Jones of his employment following a material reduction in his authority, functions, duties or responsibilities and the Company’s failure to restore such authority, functions, duties or responsibilities after notice; (iv) within six (6) months of the effective date of a change in control, Mr. Jones’ employment is terminated without cause or there occurs a material reduction in Mr. Jones’ authority, function, duties or responsibilities which causes his  resignation; or (v) Mr. Jones’ death or disability. 

During the employment term, the Company and University may designate Mr. Jones as “President Emeritus,” in which case Mr. Jones would be entitled to receive his annual base salary, annual target equity share grant and continuation of medical benefits for the remainder of the term of the Employment Agreement.

The Employment Agreement further provides certain restrictive covenants, binding Mr. Jones to perpetual confidentiality restrictions and a three-year, post-termination non-compete and employee no-hire covenant.None

98115


 

Table of Contents

PART III

 

Item 10.      Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s directors, executive officers, and significant employees:

 

 

 

 

Name

Age

Position

Directors:

 

 

Robert S. Silberman

60

61

Executive Chairman of the Board

Dr. John T. Casteen IIIJ. Kevin Gilligan

64

74Executive Vice Chairman and Director

Robert R. Grusky

61

Presiding Independent Director

Dr. Charlotte F. Beason

70

71

Director

Sen. William E. BrockRita D. Brogley

53

87Director

Dr. John T. Casteen III

75

Director

H. James Dallas

60

Director

Nathaniel C. Fick

40

Director

Robert R. Grusky

60

41

Director

Karl McDonnell

51

52

Director, Chief Executive Officer

Todd A. Milano

65

66

Director

G. Thomas Waite, III

66

67

Director

J. David Wargo

64

65

Director

Executive Officers:

 

 

Executive Officers:

 

 

Daniel W. Jackson

43

44

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Lizette B. Herraiz

44

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

Andrew E. Watt

41

Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer

Christa E. Hokenson

48

Chief Human Resources Officer

Thomas J. Aprahamian

49

50

Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

University Officers

 

 

University Officers:

 

 

Brian W. Jones

49

50

President, Strayer University

Andrea S. BackmanRichard Senese, PhD

57

48

Provost and Chief Academic Officer

Chad D. Nyce

45

Chief Operating Officer, StrayerPresident, Capella University

 

Directors

 

Mr. Robert S. Silberman was named Strayer’s Executive Chairmanhas been a Director of the Board in 2013.Company since March 2001. He was Chairman of the Board from February 2003 to 2013 and Chief Executive Officer from March 2001 to 2013. Mr. Silberman was named Executive Chairman of the Board in 2013. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Silberman served in a variety of senior management positions at CalEnergy Company, Inc., including as President and Chief Operating Officer. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Silberman was Assistant to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of International Paper Company. From 1989 to 1993, Mr. Silberman served in several senior positions in the U.S. Department of Defense, including as Assistant Secretary of the Army. Mr. SilbermanSince 2014, he has beenserved as a directorManaging Director of Strayer since March 2001.Equity Group Investments. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc., Covanta Holding Company, and Par Petroleum Corporation,Pacific Holdings; and 21st Century Fox. Mr. Silberman is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Silberman holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Dartmouth College and a master’s degree in international policy from The Johns Hopkins University.

 

Dr. John T. Casteen IIIMr. J. Kevin Gilligan  is the President Emeritus and University Professor at the University of Virginia, where he teaches courses in literature, cultural history, and public policy. He served as President of the University of Virginia from 1990 through 2010. He was President of the University of Connecticut from 1985 to 1990. From 1982 to 1985, Dr. Casteen served as the Secretary of Education for the Commonwealth of Virginia. Dr. Casteen is on the board of directors of Altria, Inc. Dr. Casteen is also is director of a number of charitableChief Executive Officer and privately-held business entities, including ECHO 360, and the Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation. He has chaired the boards of both the College Entrance Examination Board and the Association of American Universities. Dr. Casteen has been a member of the Board since 2011, is Chair of Directors of Capella Education Company beginning in March 2009, and was appointed the Nominating CommitteeChairman of the Board of Capella Education Company in February 2010, positions he held until being appointed as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Strategic Education, Inc. on August 1, 2018. Mr. Gilligan is a member of the board of directors for Graco Inc., a publicly held manufacturer and currently serves assupplier of fluid handling equipment, and from September 2004 until February 2009 was a member of the Presiding Independent Director. Dr. Casteen holdsboard for ADC Telecommunications, Inc., a bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, andpublicly held global supplier of network infrastructure. Mr. Gilligan was previously the Chief Executive Officer of United Subcontractors, Inc., a Ph.D. in English from the University of Virginia, as well as several honorary degrees, including degrees from the Universities of Athens (Greece) and Edinburgh (Scotland) and two community colleges in Virginia.nationwide construction

99116


 

Table of Contents

services company, from 2004 until February 2009. United Subcontractors voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 31, 2009 and emerged from the bankruptcy proceedings on June 30, 2009. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Gilligan served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Automation and Control Solutions Group of Honeywell International, a diversified technology and manufacturing company. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Gilligan served as President of the Home and Building Control Division of Honeywell International. Mr. Gilligan also served as President of the Solutions and Services Division of Honeywell International from 1997 to 1999 and as Vice President and General Manager of the North American Region of the Home and Building Control Division from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Gilligan holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Boston College.

Mr. Robert R. Grusky is the Founder and has been the Managing Member of Hope Capital Management, LLC, an investment manager, since 2000. He co-founded New Mountain Capital, LLC, a private equity firm, in 2000 and was a Principal and Member from 2000 to 2005, and has been a Senior Advisor since then. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Grusky served as President of RSL Investments Corporation. From 1985 to 1997, with the exception of 1990 to 1991 when he was on a leave of absence to serve as a White House Fellow and Assistant for Special Projects to the Secretary of Defense, Mr. Grusky served in a variety of capacities at Goldman, Sachs & Co., first in its Mergers & Acquisitions Department and then in its Principal Investment Area. He also serves on the Board of Directors of AutoNation, Inc. Mr. Grusky has served on the Board since 2001, is the Chair of the Nominating Committee, and currently serves as the Presiding Independent Director. He holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Union College and a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard University.

Dr. Charlotte F. Beasonis a consultant in education and health care administration. She was Executive Director of the Kentucky Board of Nursing from 2005 to 2012. From 2000 to 2003, Dr. Beason was Chair and Vice Chair of the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (an autonomous agency accrediting baccalaureate and graduate programs in nursing). From 1988 to 2004, Dr. Beason was with the Department of Veterans Affairs, first as Director of Health Professions Education Service and the Health Professional Scholarship Program, and then as Program Director, Office of Nursing Services. Dr. Beason has served on the Board since 1996 and is a member of the Nominating Committee. She is also Chairwoman of the Strayer University Board of Trustees. Dr. Beason holds a bachelor’s degree in nursing from Berea College, a master’s degree in psychiatric nursing from Boston University and a doctorate in clinical psychology and public practice from Harvard University.

Senator William E. BrockMs. Rita D. Brogley is an experienced executive and entrepreneur in both early stage and large public companies. She joined Facebook, Inc. in November 2016 and is the FounderHead of Global Enterprise Partnerships for Messaging Platforms and ChairmanCommunity Management. Prior to that, Ms. Brogley served as President and CEO of MyBuys, a marketing technology company, from 2012 until its merger with Magnetic in 2015. From 2008 to 2011, Ms. Brogley was the Brock Offices,CEO of Amadesa, a firm specializing in international trade, investment,technology provider of website testing and human resources. From 1985optimization, and from 2000 to 1987, Senator Brock2002, she served in the President’s Cabinet as the U.S. SecretaryPresident and CEO of Labor, and from 1981 to 1985, as the U.S. Trade Representative. Senator Brock previouslyMoxi Digital. Ms. Brogley served as Director of Business Development and Marketing Europe for Microsoft TV from 1997 to 2000 and was a Membermanagement consultant with Bain and Company from 1995 to 1997. Ms. Brogley served on the Board of Congress and subsequently as U.S. Senator forCapella Education Company from 2014 until her appointment to the StateBoard of Tennessee. Senator BrockStrategic Education, Inc. on August 1, 2018. She is a member of the BoardCompensation Committee. Ms. Brogley holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from Northwestern University and a master’s degree in business administration from the Harvard Business School.

Dr. John T. Casteen IIIis the President Emeritus and University Professor at the University of Directors of On Assignment, Inc.,Virginia, where he teaches courses in literature, cultural history, and ResCare, Inc., and is a Senior Counselor and Memberpublic policy. He served as President of the BoardUniversity of TrusteesVirginia from 1990 through 2010. He was President of the CenterUniversity of Connecticut from 1985 to 1990. From 1982 to 1985, Dr. Casteen served as the Secretary of Education for Strategicthe Commonwealth of Virginia. Dr. Casteen is on the board of directors of Altria, Inc. Dr. Casteen is also director of a number of charitable and International Studies, where he chairsprivately-held business entities, including ECHO 360, and the International Policy Roundtable. Senator BrockJamestown-Yorktown Foundation. He has chaired the boards of both the College Entrance Examination Board and the Association of American Universities. Dr. Casteen has been a member of the Board since 20012011, and is on the Nominating Committee of the Board. Dr. Casteen holds a bachelor’s degree, master’s degree and a Ph.D. in English from the University of Virginia, as well as several honorary degrees, including degrees from the Universities of Athens (Greece) and Edinburgh (Scotland) and two community colleges in Virginia.

117


Table of Contents

Mr. H. James Dallashas been an independent consultant since September 2013, focusing on information technology strategy, risk, and change management through James Dallas & Associates. From March 2006 until September 2013, Mr. Dallas was with Medtronic Public Limited Company, a manufacturer of cardiac and other specialized medical devices. He was responsible for various aspects of Medtronic’s operations, serving first as Medtronic’s Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer and most recently, from 2008 to 2013, as Senior Vice President, Quality and Operations. Prior to joining Medtronic, Mr. Dallas was with Georgia-Pacific Corporation, a maker of tissue, pulp, paper, packaging, building products and related chemicals, from 1984 to 2006. While at Georgia-Pacific, Mr. Dallas held various roles of increasing responsibility, ending his career with Georgia-Pacific as its Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 2002 to 2006. In addition, Mr. Dallas also serves as a director of the non-profits Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation and the Atlanta Community Food Bank. Prior to joining the Board of Strategic Education on August 1, 2018, on which he serves as a member of the Compensation Committee.Audit Committee, he served on the Board of Capella Education Company. He also serves on the boards of KeyCorp and WellCare Health Plans, Inc. Mr. Dallas holds a bachelor’s degree in commerceaccounting from Washingtonthe University of South Carolina-Aiken, and Leea master’s of business administration from Emory University.

 

Mr. Nathaniel C. Fickis the Chief Executive Officer of Endgame, a technology firm focusing on cybersecurity. He previously served as a Captain in the United States Marine Corps, leading infantry and reconnaissance units in combat in Afghanistan and Iraq. His book about that experience, “One Bullet Away,” was a New York Times bestseller, a Washington Post "Best“Best Book of the Year," and one of the Military Times' "BestTimes’ “Best Military Books of the Decade.” Mr. Fick is a graduate of Dartmouth College, the Harvard Kennedy School, and the Harvard Business School, and serves as a Trustee of Dartmouth College. Mr. Fick was elected to the Board in 2016, and serves on the Audit Committee.

 

Mr. Robert R. Grusky is the Founder and has been the Managing Member of Hope Capital Management, LLC, an investment manager, since 2000. He co-founded New Mountain Capital, LLC, a private equity firm, in 2000 and was a Principal and Member from 2000 to 2005, and has been a Senior Advisor since then. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Grusky served as President of RSL Investments Corporation. From 1985 to 1997, with the exception of 1990 to 1991 when he was on a leave of absence to serve as a White House Fellow and Assistant for Special Projects to the Secretary of Defense, Mr. Grusky served in a variety of capacities at Goldman, Sachs & Co., first in its Mergers & Acquisitions Department and then in its Principal Investment Area. He also serves on the Board of Directors of AutoNation, Inc. In the past five years, he has also served on the Board of Directors of AutoZone, Inc. Mr. Grusky has served on the Board since 2001 and is a member of the Nominating Committee. He holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Union College and a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard University.

Mr. Karl McDonnellwas named Chief Executive Officer of the Company in May 2013, and has served as President and Chief Operating Officer since 2006.from 2006 to 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McDonnell served as Chief Operating Officer of InteliStaf Healthcare, Inc., one of the nation’s largest privately-held healthcare staffing firms. Prior to his tenure at InteliStaf, he served as Vice President of the Investment Banking Division at Goldman, Sachs & Co. Mr. McDonnell has held senior management positions with several Fortune 100 companies, including The Walt Disney Company. Mr. McDonnell has served on the Board since 2011. Mr. McDonnell holds a bachelor’s degree from Virginia Wesleyan College and a master’s degree in business administration from Duke University.

 

Mr. Todd A. Milanois President Emeritus and Ambassador of Central Penn College, where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1989 to 2012. Mr. Milano has served on the Board since 1996 and is a member of the Compensation Committee of the Board. AsMr. Milano served as a member of the Strayer University Board of Trustees sincefrom 1992 he has chaired the University’s Presidential Search Committees.until December 2018. Mr. Milano holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial management from Purdue University.

 

Mr. G. Thomas Waite, III has been Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Humane Society of the United States since 1997 and prior to that served as Controller beginning in 1993. In 1992, Mr. Waite was the Director of Commercial Management of The National Housing Partnership. Mr. Waite has served on the Board since 1996, is Chair

100


Table of Contents

of the Audit Committee, and is a former member of the Strayer University Board of Trustees. Mr. Waite holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce from the University of Virginia and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Waite is a leader in philanthropy and the non-profit sector, which is the Company’s indispensable partner in fulfilling our mission of providing quality education to working adults.

 

Mr. J. David Wargo has been President of Wargo and Company, Inc., an investment management company, since 1993. Mr. Wargo is a co-founder and was a Member of New Mountain Capital, LLC, from 2000 to 2008, and was a Senior Advisor there from 2008 until 2011. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. Wargo was a Managing Director and Senior Analyst of The Putnam Companies, a Boston-based investment management company. From 1985 to 1989, Mr. Wargo was a partner and held other positions at Marble Arch Partners. Mr. Wargo is also a Director of Liberty Global, Inc.,plc, Discovery Communications, Inc., Liberty Broadband Corporation, Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings, Inc., and Vobile Holdings Ltd.Discovery, Inc. Mr. Wargo has served on the Board since 2001 and is Chair of the Compensation Committee of the Board. Mr. Wargo holds a bachelor’s degree in physics and a master’s degree in nuclear engineering, both from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He also holds a master’s degree in management science from the Sloan School of Management, which is the business school of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

118


Table of Contents

Executive Officers

 

Mr. Daniel W. Jackson is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Jackson has been with the company since 2003 and has served as Senior Vice President of Finance, Regional Vice President of Operations, Director of Business Operations, Campus Director, and as Manager of Financial Analysis. Prior to joining Strayer, Mr. Jackson was an Equity Research Associate with Legg Mason Wood Walker, and Director of Operations for Fairmont Schools, Inc. Mr. Jackson holds a bachelor’s degree in international affairs from the University of Colorado at Boulder, and a master’s degree in business administration from Georgetown University.

Ms. Lizette B. Herraiz is Senior Vice President, General Counsel. Ms. Herraiz has been with the Company since 2013. She previously served as Deputy General Counsel of Strayer Education, Inc., and as General Counsel of Strayer University. Prior to joining Strayer, Ms. Herraiz served in the United States Department of Justice as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Justice Programs, and as Counsel in the Office of Legal Policy. Ms. Herraiz earned a Bachelor of Arts in Government from the University of Virginia, and her Juris Doctor from the George Mason University School of Law.

Mr. Andrew E. Watt is Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Watt previously served as Senior Vice President of Post-Secondary Education to SEI, and previously under the same title to Capella Education Company. Prior to service as SVP of Post-Secondary Education, Andy served as vice president of Colleges and University Operations and Capella University’s chief operations officer from 2014 to 2019. He has held a variety of leadership positions across Capella University, including roles in Operations, Finance, Analytics and its Markets & Products team. Before joining Capella, he worked in transaction advisory services at both Deloitte & Touche LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP. Mr. Watt graduated from the University of St. Thomas with a bachelor’s degree in finance and accounting.

Ms. Christa E. Hokenson is  Chief Human Resources Officer. Ms. Hokenson joined SEI in 2018 and brings more than 20 years of experience in business leadership, organizational consulting, and HR strategy. Previously, Ms. Hokenson was Managing Director and Chief Human Resources Officer at ProShares, and held HR leadership positions at Capital One in both Europe and the U.S. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from The College of William & Mary.

 

Mr. Thomas J. Aprahamian is Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Aprahamian has been with the Company since 2009 and has served as University Controller and Vice President and Controller. Mr. Aprahamian previously held a variety of accounting operations and financial reporting roles including the Chief Accounting Officer at The Advisory Board Company, where he served from 2001 to 2007. Prior to that he spent seven years in the telecommunications industry and began his career at Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Aprahamian passed the CPA exam in 1992 and earned his bachelor of business administration degree from James Madison University.

 

University Officers

 

Mr. Brian W. Jones is theStrayer University President. Mr. Jones joined Strayer University in 2012 as the General Counsel. Prior to joining Strayer University, he co-founded and served as president of Latimer Education, Inc., a venture-backed company partnering with a historically black college to provide online postsecondarypost-secondary education solutions to African American working adults. He previously served for four years as the U.S. Department of Education’s general counsel, a Senate-confirmed presidential appointment, under former Secretary of Education Rod Paige;Paige, among other senior higher education roles. Jones currently chairs the board of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. He previously served as chair of the D.C. Public Charter School Board (PCSB), having been twice nominated by the Secretary of Education and appointed by the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Mr. Jones holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Georgetown University and a juris doctor degree from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Law.

 

Ms. Andrea S. BackmanDr. Richard Senese is Provost and Chief Academic Officer. Ms. Backman most recentlyCapella University President. He served as Deanvice president of the Jack Welch Management Institute where she was responsibleAcademic Affairs and chief academic officer for all academic matters including faculty on-boardingCapella University from 2014 to 2015 and performance management, product design and development, and the overall student experience. Prior to joining JWMI, Ms. Backmanbecame interim president in 2015. Dr. Senese served as a faculty member and online leader atin leadership roles with the University of Virginia. She alsoMinnesota Extension for 13 years. He has taught at a number of Minnesota-based institutions, including St. Olaf College, Metropolitan State University, and the College of St. Scholastica, and served previously as Senior Vice Provostthe associate dean for Faculty at Strayer University, DirectorCapella University’s Harold Abel School of New Program Development at the University of Virginia, and Associate Director for Distance Education at DePaul University. Prior to her work in academia, she worked in industry in both marketing and research functions. She holds a Ph.D.Psychology. Dr. Senese received his PhD from the University of Virginia, a master’s degree from DePaul University, and an undergraduate degree from the Pennsylvania State University.Minnesota

101119


 

Table of Contents

through the Counseling and Student Personnel Psychology program within the Department of Educational Psychology. He is a licensed psychologist.

Mr. Chad D. Nyce

Additional information responsive to this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the University’s Chief Operating Officer. He joined Strayer University in 2007. Previously, he was a regional vice president of operations for InteliStaf Healthcare, Inc., one of the nation's largest privately-held healthcare staffing firms. Prior to his tenure at InteliStaf, he served as a vice president of the Investment Banking Division at Goldman, Sachs & Co. Chad has also held senior management positions at BostonCoach, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fidelity Investments. He holds a bachelor’s and master’s degree from Temple University.

Code of Business Conduct

The Boardsections titled “Election of Directors, adopted a Code” “Board Structure,” “Code of Business Conduct in February 2004, meeting the requirements of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Ethics” and applicable NASDAQ requirements. The Code of Business Conduct was last amended on February 13, 2018, and includes, among other things, provisions prohibiting directors, officers, and employees from: insider trading; investing in Company-based derivative securities, including options, warrants, or similar rights whose value is derived from the value of an equity security; short selling or pledging the Company’s securities; and trading in the Company’s securities on a short-term basis. The Company will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of such Code of Business Conduct. Persons wishing to make such a request should contact Daniel W. Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 2303 Dulles Station Blvd., Herndon, VA 20171, (703) 561-1600. In addition, the Code of Business Conduct is available on the corporate website, www.strayereducation.com. In the event that the Company makes any amendment to, or grants any waiver from, a provision of the Code of Business Conduct that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, or certain other senior officers and requires disclosure under applicable SEC rules, the Company intends to disclose such amendment or waiver and the reasons for the amendment or waiver on the Company’s website, www.strayereducation.com or, as required by NASDAQ, file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC reporting the amendment or waiver.

Section“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) requiresCompliance” contained in the Company’s directors, executive officers, and 10% stockholders to file reports of beneficial ownership of equity securities of the Company and to furnish copies of such reports to the Company. Based on a review of such reports, and upon written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that, during the fiscal year endedProxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days following December 31, 2017, all such filing requirements were met.

Audit Committee Financial Experts

The Company has established a standing Audit Committee. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Audit Committee was composed of Messrs. Waite (Chair), Fick, and Wargo. The Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent, as independence is defined under the NASDAQ Listing Standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the 1934 Act. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Waite and Wargo qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC rules, based on their education, experience, and background.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the last ten years, none of our officers or directors have been involved in any legal proceedings as described in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Procedures for Nominating Directors

In 2017, the Company did not make any material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors.2018.

 

102120


 

Table of Contents

 

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

 

The following discussion summarizes our executive compensation program for our named executive officers (“NEOs”). For 2017, our NEOs were:

NEO

Title

Robert S. Silberman

Executive Chairman

Karl McDonnell

Chief Executive Officer & Director

Daniel W. Jackson

Chief Financial Officer

Brian W. Jones

President, Strayer University

Thomas J. Aprahamian

Chief Accounting Officer

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

The Company’s executive compensation programinformation required by this Item is designed to drive performancehereby incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Compensation Discussion and align the long-term interests of management and our stockholders. Academic quality is the cornerstone of this program, and ultimately advances all other key metrics. The Company’s policies on compensation, consistent with Department of Education regulations, seek to reward achievement of financial and academic goals, both of which are driven by the success of our academic programs. The following chart highlights key policies and objectives behind the Company’s development, review, and approval of NEO compensation:

COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES

Align Interests

The Company seeks to align the thinking of our executives and directors with those of our stockholders. It does so by adopting a compensation program that incentivizes student success, financial performance, and regulatory compliance. Each of these goals is ultimately advanced by a focus on academic quality and the student experience. The Company also aligns long-term interests by requiring share ownership for all Board members and executives at the Senior Vice President level and above.

Attract and Retain Talent

The Company sets compensation at levels sufficient to attract and retain highly qualified and productive personnel. There are three major components of overall compensation: salary, non-equity incentive compensation, and equity grants. In order to better pay for performance, the Compensation Committee generally sets target salary at or below the midpoint of comparable companies, and incentive compensation at or above the midpoint of comparable companies.

Pay for Performance

In making decisions on whether, and at what level, to fund non-equity incentive compensation each year, the Compensation Committee looks at whether the Company met certain performance objectives determined annually by the Board of Directors. These objectives consist of both quantitative financial metrics and qualitative academic metrics. The Compensation Committee sets threshold, target, and maximum levels, which achieve a 50%, 100%, and 150% potential target payout, respectively, with reductions or increases corresponding to the percentage of target achieved between these ranges.

103


Table of Contents

The Company increases value and accountability of its NEOs through the following best practices:

WHAT WE DO

WHAT WE DO NOT DO

Limit discretion by setting clear quantitative metrics for non-equity incentive compensation, with target payouts as a percentage of base salary for all named executive officers

X No compensation decisions for our NEOs without oversight of independent directors

Set CEO compensation to where at least 50% of target annual compensation is performance-based

X  No hedging or other investments in derivatives of the Company, and no margin purchases 

Include robust performance-based criteria for the vesting of equity grants to named executive officers

X No pledging of Company securities

Include double-trigger change in control vesting provisions for equity awards

X No excise tax gross-ups upon change in control

Clawback incentive compensation based on restated financial statements or performance metrics, regardless of whether the restatement is for miscalculation or misconduct

X No stock option re-pricing

Use a representative and relevant peer group to guide compensation

X No perquisites

X No executive pensions or supplemental executive retirement plan “SERP”

In October 2017, the Audit Committee recommended to the full Board of Directors an amendment to the Code of Business Conduct to prohibit the pledging of Company securities, which the Board of Directors adopted on February 13, 2018 by amending and restating the Code of Business Conduct. As of December 31, 2017, there are no pledged shares.

Compensation Policies and Objectives

In accordance with the Compensation Committee charter, the Company employs the following general policies in determining executive compensation:

·

The Company believes that compensation of the Company’s key executives should be sufficient to attract and retain highly qualified and productive personnel, as well as to enhance productivity and reward superior performance.

·

It is the policy of the Company that the three primary components of the Company’s compensation package for named executive officers (salary, non-equity incentive compensation, and equity grants) be considered in the aggregate. In other words, the total compensation of our executive officers should be appropriate to their contributions, and the amount of each component should take into account the size of their total compensation package, even if one individual component is larger or smaller than industry average.

·

Consistent with Department of Education regulations, the Company seeks to reward achievement of specific corporate goals by executing for named executive officers a non-equity incentive compensation plan with specific, pre-defined corporate goals and target payouts as a percentage of salary, and equity compensation with a required vesting period and robust performance-based vesting criteria.

·

The criteria used by the Compensation Committee in deciding whether and/or at what level, to pay non-equity incentive compensation is whether the Company met certain performance objectives set annually by the Board. The Compensation Committee makes these assessments based on the Company’s annual financial statements, which are audited by the Company’s independent auditing firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Each year, the corporate objectives used to determine incentive compensation eligibility for executives are chosen by the Board of Directors from criteria which were approved by the stockholders of the Company. Criteria were approved most recently by stockholders at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company on May 5, 2015.

104


Table of Contents

·

One of the Company’s guiding principles is that its officers and directors think like owners. To this end, the Company adopted a requirement that within three years of hiring, promotion, or being appointed to the Board, senior officers and members of the Board of Directors own shares equal to the amounts shown in the table below. The Board reviews compliance with this policy consistent with historic share ownership, market price fluctuations, and other factors.

Title

Required Share Ownership

Executive Chairman

5x Annual Salary

Chief Executive Officer

5x Annual Salary

Board of Directors

3x Annual Retainer

Executive Vice President

3x Annual Salary

Senior Vice President

2x Annual Salary

·

In determining compensation levels at the Company for 2017, the Compensation Committee compared executive compensation at the Company to that of the following ten publicly traded companies which own education assets: American Public Education, Inc., Bridgepoint Education, Capella Education Company, Career Education Corporation, Adtalem Global Education, Inc., Grand Canyon Education, Inc., Laureate Education, Inc., K12, Inc., Lincoln Education Services, and Universal Technical Institute. The Compensation Committee also compared executive compensation at the Company to companies in other industries that are similar in revenue, market capitalization, and growth profile.

·

The Compensation Committee generally sets salary targets at or below the midpoint of comparable companies, and incentive compensation targets (both non-equity and stock-based) at or above the midpoint of comparable companies. This mix of compensation ensures that a greater proportion of executive pay is based on actual performance of the Company. If, in the Board’s judgment, the midpoint or upper quartile calculations of the comparable companies yield too high a compensation level, the Board will not match these levels, but instead will make reasoned judgments to establish the Company’s executive compensation at levels it deems more appropriate.

Stockholder Outreach

The Company values our stockholders’ opinions on the effectiveness of our compensation program. At the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, more than 85% of the votes cast were cast in favor of the advisory resolution to approve the 2017 compensation for the Company’s named executive officers. The Company believes this vote reflected general stockholder approval of the Company’s overall pay practicesAnalysis” and the absence of any practices that stockholders consider problematic. Additionally, the Company took a number of steps in recent years to enhance our compensation program based on stockholder feedbackrelated tables and expectations:

·

Engaged stockholders to receive more and continuing feedback on our compensation program;

·

Established a non-equity incentive compensation plan for all NEOs, with target payouts designated as a percentage of base salary, thereby replacing the previous discretionary bonus system;

·

Added new, robust performance criteria for the vesting of all performance-based equity awards granted in 2017 and thereafter;

·

Provided more transparency to the actual performance objectives established by the Board; and

·

Provided additional disclosures regarding the objectives and targets used to make determinations on compensation.

Throughout 2017, the Company continued our practice of year-round stockholder engagement related to business highlights and governance. At various times during the year, we met in-person or conducted calls with representatives from 15 different institutional investors, who collectively own over 53% of the Company’s outstanding shares. The

105


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee values stockholder feedback provided through both the voting at the annual meeting of stockholders and stockholder outreach, and will continue to consider stockholder feedback in the future. 

Who Determines Compensation?

Each year, the Board of Directors sets a number of goals and objectives for the Company’s business, including both financial and academic criteria. From these Company goals and objectives, the Compensation Committee designates certain quantitative and qualitative goals to establish performance expectations associated with non-equity incentive compensation. For NEOs other than Mr. Jones, quantitative financial metrics make up 75% of non-equity incentive compensation, and qualitative academic metrics account for the remaining 25%. For Mr. Jones, the President of Strayer University, quantitative financial metrics make up 30% of non-equity incentive compensation, and qualitative academic metrics make up the remaining 70%. For each quantitative goal, the Compensation Committee sets a target performance level that, if met, would result in a 100% target performance payout. If actual performance is above the target level, the performance payout is up to 150% of the target payout. The Compensation Committee also sets threshold levels. If actual performance is below the target level but above the threshold level, non-equity incentive compensation is reduced to correspond to the percentage of target achieved. The Compensation Committee retains discretion to reduce such pay even further. As discussed further below in the “2017 Compensation Decisions” section, the Compensation Committee determined the non-equity incentive compensation payouts for 2017 to be 56.25% of target for Messrs. McDonnell, Silberman, Jackson and Aprahamian because the Company’s performance met the qualitative metrics and exceeded the target payout level for the Revenue metric, but did not meet the threshold levels for the other quantitative metrics. For Mr. Jones, whose non-equity incentive compensation is more heavily weighted to qualitative academic metrics than quantitative financial metrics, the Compensation Committee determined the non-equity performance payout for 2017 to be 82.5% of target.

In accordance with the Compensation Committee charter, compensation for the Company’s Executive Chairman and its CEO is determined by the Compensation Committee, subject to approval of the Company’s Board of Directors (excluding the Executive Chairmannarrative thereto, “Director Compensation” and the CEO, who are also directors). In making its determination on Executive Chairman and CEO compensation, the Compensation Committee reviews a number of factors, including but not limited to:

·

The Company’s achievement of annual goals and objectives, both quantitative and qualitative, set by the full Board of Directors in the preceding year;

·

The long-term performance of the Company; and

·

CEO compensation levels at comparable companies.

For the other named executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviews, approves, and recommends to the full Board compensation based on:

·

Performance of the named executive officers in light of relevant goals and objectives approved by the Compensation Committee and the annual goals and objectives established by the Board in the preceding year (and, for Mr. Jones, additional academic objectives approved by the Board of Trustees of the University);

·

Executive compensation levels at comparable companies; and

·

The recommendations of the Executive Chairman and the CEO.

The Executive Chairman and the CEO provide recommendations for named executive officer compensation (other than themselves) to the Compensation Committee based on a review and analysis of each officer’s performance and contributions to the Company. For Mr. Jones, the Compensation Committee also considers the recommendations of the University’s Board of Trustees. While the Compensation Committee considers all of these recommendations, the Compensation Committee independently evaluates the recommendations for purposes of making its final recommendations to the full Board.

The Compensation Committee meets in the beginning of each year to review financial performance, to determine non-equity incentive compensation for the prior fiscal year, to consider equity awards, and to set executive officer

106


Table of Contents

salaries for the next fiscal year. The Compensation Committee meets again during the year, as may be required, to address compensation and equity grant issues for new officers and directors, to make equity grants as long-term compensation, and to make other determinations or recommendations with respect to employee benefit plans and related matters.

Identification and Analysis of 2017 Compensation Programs

During 2017, the Company’s executive compensation program included salaries, non-equity incentive compensation, discretionary bonuses for NEOs engaged in the pending merger with Capella Education Company, as discussed below, and long-term compensation in the form of restricted stock awarded under the Company’s 2015 Equity Compensation Plan.

·

Salary — Salaries for executives other than the Executive Chairman and the CEO are reviewed, approved, and recommended to the full Board annually by the Compensation Committee upon recommendation of the Executive Chairman and the CEO. The Executive Chairman’s and the CEO’s salaries are specified in their employment agreements (see “Employment Agreements with Mr. Silberman and Mr. McDonnell” and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” sections below), and are annually reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors.

·

Non-Equity Incentive Compensation — Non-equity incentive compensation for our named executive officers is determined each year by our Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. In determining whether and/or how much non-equity incentive compensation to recommend, the Compensation Committee determines whether, and to what extent, the Company has achieved its annual corporate objectives for the year, compares that achievement against specific, predetermined performance criteria, and calculates the payout relative to target.

As befits a company whose main operating asset is a 126-year old University holding the highest possible academic accreditation, these annual corporate objectives include a number of academic measures, as well as non-financial operational targets and financial metrics. Of course, even if the Company achieves all of its academic, operational, and financial objectives in a given year, in the event of a breach of regulatory, legal, or ethical business standards, the Compensation Committee may eliminate the payment of non-equity incentive compensation for that year.

Although the Company’s stock price  may fluctuate during the year, the Board strongly believes that management’s responsibility is to create an enduring increase in the long-term value of the Company. By achieving its annual corporate objectives, management will necessarily increase the long-term value of the Company and generate sustainable long-term increases in the value of our equity. Each year, the Board selects annual corporate objectives based on performance metrics approved by the stockholders of the Company for purposes of the Company’s equity and non-equity incentive compensation programs. For 2017, the objectives were chosen based on performance metrics approved by stockholders at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as part of the 2015 Equity Compensation Plan, which amended and restated the 2011 Equity Compensation Plan. While the Board believes that each of the various annual corporate objectives is relevant to the determination of executive compensation, the achievement of any one annual corporate objective would not, in and of itself, result in a specific amount of non-equity incentive compensation being paid to our named executive officers. In establishing the performance targets, the Compensation Committee sets the targets at levels that are realistic, but not certain.

The target non-equity incentive compensation for both the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer is 125% of base salary, as set forth in their respective employment agreements. For 2017, the Compensation Committee set target non-equity incentive compensation for the other named executive officers based on its evaluation of expectations for the positions held and the executives’ ultimate ability to influence the outcomes desired. For the Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Committee set target non-equity incentive compensation at 75% of base salary. As the primary officer responsible for the Company’s budget, Mr. Jackson is best positioned to ensure the proper balance between revenue and expenditures, and thus a larger portion of his annual compensation is tied to performance measures.

107


Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee set Mr. Jones’ target non-equity incentive compensation at 50% of base salary. As the leader of the Company’s primary asset, Strayer University, Mr. Jones’ focus should be on qualitative academic measures, as established by the Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Trustees of the University. As such, for Mr. Jones, quantitative financial metrics make up 30% of the target non-equity incentive compensation, and qualitative academic metrics make up the remaining 70%. Mr. Jones’ qualitative metrics include additional academic measures not included in performance metrics for other NEOs.

Finally, the Compensation Committee set the target non-equity incentive compensation for the Chief Accounting Officer at 25% of base salary. Although the Compensation Committee determined that the Chief Accounting Officer, like the Chief Financial Officer, plays an important role in ensuring that financial objectives are met, the Committee also wanted to ensure proper and conservative judgment on financial controls and reporting. The Chief Accounting Officer’s relatively smaller proportion of annual compensation based on financial performance measures reduces risks associated with financial controls and reporting. See “Summary Compensation” and “2017 Compensation Decisions” for more information regarding non-equity incentive compensation for 2017.

·

Bonuses for Other Senior Executives — Consistent with Department of Education regulations, the Company has established a bonus plan for senior executives who are not named executive officers but who nevertheless meaningfully contribute to the success of Strayer University and the financial health of the Company. Such bonuses, both in cash and in equity, are determined each year by the Compensation Committee based on recommendations from the Executive Chairman and CEO. In determining whether and how much to recommend for such bonuses, the Compensation Committee determines whether and to what extent the Company has achieved its annual corporate objectives for the year, the individual contribution of each executive to such achievement, and other criteria, such as comparable market pay and retention priorities.

·

Equity-based Compensation Program — As discussed above, the Company believes it should, subject to achievement of certain academic, operational, financial, and individual objectives, make annual equity grants in order to retain, motivate, and align the interests of those key executive officers with stockholders.

Equity awards under this program are only made after the Compensation Committee and the full Board of Directors have completed their analysis of both corporate and individual performance described above. For our Chief Executive Officer, we believe that at least 50% of his target total annual compensation should be performance-based equity grants of restricted stock with at least a four-year cliff vest. Prior to 2017, all performance-based equity grants included performance measures related to maintaining all required regulatory approvals and Strayer University’s regional accreditation. These criteria were both reasonably uncertain and of paramount importance to both the short-term and long-term viability of the Company. In 2017, the Compensation Committee added new performance criteria for the vesting of equity awards to named executive officers. These new criteria include maintaining Strayer University’s 90/10 ratio below 80%, and its Cohort Default Rates below the national average for proprietary institutions which, for the most recently calculated cohort, was 15.5%. The 90/10 ratio prohibits a proprietary institution from deriving more than 90% of revenues from Title IV funds; by setting Strayer University’s maximum at 80% for equity vesting purposes, the Company incentivizes named executive officers to diversify revenue sources and minimizes any risk of jeopardizing Title IV funds. The Cohort Default Rate is the federally mandated measure of student defaults on Title IV loans based on a three-year cohort, and an institution may lose eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV programs if, for three consecutive fiscal years, 30% or more of its students default on payments. Setting the maximum at below the average for proprietary schools helps ensure continued eligibility for Title IV funds for the University, while at the same time recognizing industry or nationwide conditions that may cause the rates to fluctuate year-to-year. These additional, robust criteria therefore serve the multiple purposes of improving student success, ensuring regulatory compliance, and enhancing the intrinsic value of the Company for its stockholders.

We view our equity as very valuable and are reluctant to issue it. This means that we only grant restricted stock or stock options to employees and directors when we believe we are getting fair value (in terms of their service and performance) in return.

108


Table of Contents

Our restricted stock agreements with employees contain specific clawback provisions. If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement and the employee engaged in that misconduct knowingly failed to prevent the misconduct or was grossly negligent in preventing the misconduct, the employee is required to reimburse the Company the amount of any payment in settlement of the award earned or accrued during the 12-month period following the filing of the financial document that contained information affected by the material noncompliance. In addition, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, then the employee must forfeit any cash or stock received in connection with the award if any amount of the award was based on the achievement of pre-established performance goals that were later determined, as a result of the accounting restatement, not to have been achieved.

·

Bonuses for Certain NEOs — In 2017, the Compensation Committee awarded one-time bonuses, in addition to non-equity incentive compensation, to Messrs. Silberman, McDonnell, Jackson, and Aprahamian for their extraordinary efforts and services related to the work leading up to the pending merger, which was announced in October 2017, between the Company and Capella Education Company, as discussed in more detail below in “2017 Compensation Decisions.” 

·

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits — The Company does not offer any perquisites. The Company does reimburse relocation expenses including tax gross-ups, when applicable. This reimbursement is offered to officers hired from a different location to encourage prospective executives to relocate for the Company’s benefit.

·

Employment Agreements with Mr. Silberman and Mr. McDonnell — Robert S. Silberman, the Company’s Executive Chairman, has an employment agreement with the Company which, prior to being amended, had an initial term of approximately three years (ending on December 31, 2004), and thereafter, automatically extended for successive one-year periods unless either the Company or Mr. Silberman provided timely notice to the contrary. Mr. Silberman’s employment agreement was amended on May 2, 2013, in connection with his transition from Chief Executive Officer to Executive Chairman, and then again on April 24, 2014. Under the agreement, as amended, Mr. Silberman’s initial term of employment is six years (ending on May 2, 2019), and is renewable thereafter for one-year terms unless the Company or Mr. Silberman provides notice otherwise. The amended agreement provides for a base salary of not less than $665,000 per annum (subject to annual increases for at least cost of living adjustments). Mr. Silberman is also eligible to receive a target non-equity incentive compensation payment of at least 125% of base salary, for each of the fiscal years during which he is employed, upon meeting certain corporate and financial goals annually approved by the Board. In the event of Mr. Silberman’s termination without cause, the employment contract provides for the lump sum payment of three years base salary, three years of medical benefits, and immediate accelerated vesting of all previously granted restricted stock unit and option awards. The employment agreement also provides for a double-trigger change of control termination clause, wherein if Mr. Silberman is either (i) terminated by the Company without cause within six months of the effective date of the change of control or (ii) or there occurs a material reduction in Mr. Silberman’s authority, function, duties, or responsibilities which causes Mr. Silberman’s resignation within six months of the change of control, he is entitled to the same payments and benefits as he would be entitled to in connection with any other termination without cause, plus a lump sum payment equal to three times the latest annual non-equity incentive compensation award paid to him prior to the termination. Mr. Silberman is not entitled to a gross-up payment for any excise taxes imposed on termination payments. The agreement also contains covenants restricting Mr. Silberman from competing with the Company for six years after his termination of employment and requiring Mr. Silberman to keep confidential the Company’s proprietary information.

The Company also entered into an employment agreement on May 2, 2013 with Karl McDonnell, in connection with his promotion to Chief Executive Officer, and amended that agreement on April 24, 2014. Under the employment agreement, as amended, Mr. McDonnell’s term of employment is six years (ending on May 2, 2019) and is renewable thereafter for one-year terms unless the Company or Mr. McDonnell provides notice otherwise. Under the agreement, Mr. McDonnell will receive a base salary of $665,000 per annum (subject to annual increases for at least cost of living adjustments). Mr. McDonnell is also eligible to receive a target non-equity incentive compensation amount of 125% of base salary for each fiscal year during which he is employed,

109


Table of Contents

upon meeting certain corporate and financial goals annually approved by the Board. In addition, Mr. McDonnell’s employment agreement provides for an annual restricted share grant, conditioned upon applicable performance criteria as may be established by the Compensation Committee and with a four-year cliff vest, with a target grant date fair value equal to $2,000,000. Mr. McDonnell is not entitled to a gross-up payment for any excise taxes which may be imposed on termination payments, and his employment agreement contains severance and restrictive covenant provisions (including a double-trigger change of control termination clause), in line with the provisions set forth in Mr. Silberman’s employment agreement, discussed above.

·

Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans — The Company maintains a retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The 401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan that covers all eligible full-time and part-time employees of the Company of at least 21 years of age. The Company, in its discretion, matches employee contributions up to a maximum authorized amount under the plan. In 2017, the Company matched 50% of employee deferrals up to a maximum of 3% of the employee’s annual salary. The Company offers this plan to enable and encourage its employees to save for their retirement in a tax advantageous way. The Company also maintains an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Employee Purchase Plan”). The purpose of the Employee Purchase Plan is to enable eligible full-time employees of the Company, through payroll deductions, to purchase shares of its common stock at a 10% discount from the prevailing market price from time to time. The Company offers this plan to encourage stock ownership by its employees. The Company does not provide executives with any supplemental or deferred retirement plans.

2017 Compensation Decisions

The compensation policies and objectives outlined above formed the basis for the Compensation Committee’s recommendation, and the Board’s determination, of 2017 compensation for our named executive officers. Each component, and the overall compensation package, for named executive officers reflected the Company’s philosophy of paying for performance based on corporate and personal achievements in 2017.

Salary:  As in years, past and consistent with our pay policy and objectives, the salary for our Chief Executive Officer in 2017 was below the average of our peer companies. Likewise, salaries for other named executive officers were at or below the midpoint. In 2017, Mr. McDonnell and Mr. Silberman received their contractual increases in base salary of 1.7% (based on cost of living adjustments). This was only the second salary increase Mr. Silberman had received since 2008, and the second increase Mr. McDonnell had received since 2013, as each executive had previously declined his contractual salary increases. Absent those voluntary declinations, both executives’ salaries would have compounded significantly based on their contractual terms. Although the Compensation Committee noted its appreciation on behalf of the Company’s stockholders for the executives’ forbearances, the Committee did not take into account the prior declinations in setting their 2017 base salaries.

Non-equity Incentive Compensation:  At the start of each year, the Compensation Committee sets specific goals upon which it would evaluate non-equity incentive compensation in the upcoming year. These goals are comprised of quantitative financial objectives and qualitative academic measures. For Messrs. McDonnell, Silberman, Jackson and Aprahamian, the financial objectives account for 75% of the non-equity incentive compensation performance evaluation and the academic measures account for the remaining 25%. For Mr. Jones the financial objectives account for 30% of his non-equity incentive compensation performance evaluation, and the remaining 70% are comprised of the academic measures and additional academic objectives established by the University’s Board of Trustees. The Compensation Committee sets a range of quantitative metrics for named executive officers which, if met, would yield a target payout of non-equity incentive compensation, a threshold level which would yield a payout at 50% of target, and a maximum level that would yield a payout at 150% of target. Actual performance between threshold, target, and maximum levels leads to a corresponding percentage of payout above or below the target. Target payout is 125% of base salary for the CEO and Executive Chairman, 75% of base salary for the Chief Financial Officer, 50% of base salary for the University’s President, and 25% of base salary for the Chief Accounting Officer.

For 2017, the Compensation Committee set quantitative financial objectives for Revenue, EBIT, and Adjusted EPS (with each metric weighted equally at 25% for NEOs other than Mr. Jones, for whom the objectives are weighted equally at 10%); and qualitative academic and operational objectives (weighted at 25% for NEOs other than Mr. Jones, and comprising the remaining portion of Mr. Jones’ additional 70% of target), including receiving Middle States

110


Table of Contents

reaffirmation of accreditation, launching a new Digital MBA program, adding Strayer University corporate/institutional partners, and complying with federal regulatory requirements, such as cohort default rates and the 90/10 ratio. 

After the conclusion of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee evaluated the achievement of both the quantitative metrics and the qualitative goals. The Compensation Committee determined that the Company surpassed the Revenue target level, but did not achieve either EBIT or Adjusted EPS at the threshold level. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee calculated the Revenue payout at 125% of target, but determined that each of the EBIT and Adjusted EPS payouts were 0% because the threshold levels had not been met. Each of these components comprised 25% of total non-equity incentive compensation calculations for Messrs. McDonnell, Silberman, Jackson, and Aprahamian, and 10% for Mr. Jones.

The Compensation Committee further determined that the Company met or exceeded all of its qualitative academic and operational objectives, including receiving reaffirmation of accreditation from Middle States through the year 2025 in June 2017; launching the Digital MBA program; adding corporate/institutional partners; achieving an annual cohort default rate of 13.2% for 2016 (below the national average of 15.5% for proprietary colleges and universities), and an annual 90/10 ratio of 74.9%, each for 2016. The satisfaction of these qualitative academic goals collectively comprised 25% of the pay-for-performance calculation for all NEOs other than Mr. Jones. Mr. Jones, as the University President, also met all additional qualitative academic objectives as predetermined by the Company’s Board of Directors and Strayer University’s Board of Trustees. These objectives included improving student services, improving key academic outcomes, and successfully completing a redesign of top university courses. These additional qualitative academic objectives, when combined with the qualitative academic metrics applicable to other NEOs, together make up 70% of Mr. Jones’ total non-equity incentive compensation target.

Although the Compensation Committee appreciates that the Company’s overall financial performance depends on a number of regulatory and market factors, its overarching philosophy of pay-for-performance and adherence to predetermined performance criteria dictates non-equity incentive compensation payouts at below target levels. By the same token, the Company’s exceptional performance with respect to its academic and compliance goals indicates full credit for qualitative academic and operational metrics. After combining the performance on the quantitative and qualitative metrics, the calculated percentage of target was 56.25% for Messrs. McDonnell, Silberman, Jackson, and Aprahamian and 82.5% for Mr. Jones.

The chart below shows the 2017 breakdown of the performance metrics and the Compensation Committee’s calculations in making its pay-for-performance determinations for our NEOs other than Mr. Jones:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

 

Weight

 

Threshold 50%
Payout

 

Target 100%
Payout

 

Maximum 150%
Payout

 

2017 Results

 

2017 Calculated
% of Target

Revenue (in thousand $)

 

25

%

 

$

445,000

 

$

450,000

 

$

460,000

 

$

455,000

 

125.0

%

EBIT (in thousand $)

 

25

%

 

$

62,000

 

$

64,000

 

$

67,000

 

$

57,000

 

0.0

%

Adjusted EPS

 

25

%

 

$

3.40

 

$

3.50

 

$

3.68

 

$

3.11

 

0.0

%

Academic

 

25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Achieved

 

100.0

%

Total

 

100

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56.25

%

For Mr. Jones, for whom the financial metrics constitute 30% of his pay-for-performance target, and academic metrics (including those established by the University’s Board of Trustees) constitute 70%, the calculated percentage was 82.5%. The chart below shows the 2017 breakdown of Mr. Jones’ performance metrics and the calculations of the Compensation Committee in making its pay-for-performance determination:

 

.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Measure

 

Weight

 

Threshold 50%
Payout

 

Target 100%
Payout

 

Maximum 150%
Payout

 

2017 Results

 

2017 Calculated
% of Target

Revenue (in thousand $)

 

10

%

 

$

445,000

 

$

450,000

 

$

460,000

 

$

455,000

 

125.0

%

EBIT (in thousand $)

 

10

%

 

$

62,000

 

$

64,000

 

$

67,000

 

$

57,000

 

0.0

%

Adjusted EPS

 

10

%

 

$

3.40

 

$

3.50

 

$

3.68

 

$

3.11

 

0.0

%

Academic

 

70

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Achieved

 

100.0

%

Total

 

100

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82.5

%

111


Table of Contents

Based on this information, coupled with the evaluation of individual performance during the course of the year, non-equity incentive compensation payouts to NEOs were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Target as
a Percentage of
Base Salary

 

2017 Target
Award
Opportunity

 

 

2017 Achievement %

 

 

2017 Actual
Award

 

2017 Award as
% of Base Salary

Robert S. Silberman

 

125

 %

 

$

861,250

 

 

56.25

%

 

$

485,000

 

70

 %

Karl McDonnell

 

125

 %

 

$

861,250

 

 

56.25

%

 

$

485,000

 

70

 %

Daniel W. Jackson

 

75

%

 

$

300,000

 

 

56.25

%

 

$

170,000

 

43

 %

Brian W. Jones

 

50

%

 

$

207,500

 

 

82.50

%

 

$

170,000

 

41

 %

Thomas J. Aprahamian

 

25

%

 

$

77,500

 

 

56.25

%

 

$

45,000

 

15

 %

Equity-based Compensation:  The Company views its equity as very valuable, and is reluctant to issue it, given the dilutive effect on existing stockholders. In any given year, equity grants will generally not be awarded if the Company fails to achieve the quantitative and qualitative goals as outlined above, but neither does the achievement of those goals dictate that grants must be made. Instead, the Compensation Committee determines whether and to what extent the NEOs receive grants based on the NEOs contributions to having achieved those corporate goals, coupled with the Company’s desire to retain, motivate, and align the interests of those key executive officers with stockholders’ interest.

In February 2017, the Compensation Committee and Board evaluated the achievement of the previous fiscal year’s goals in making determinations on named executive officer long-term incentive equity grants. As fully discussed in the Company’s definitive proxy statement, filed on March 16, 2017, the quantitative metrics were all met above Threshold but below Target levels, and the qualitative metrics were fully achieved. The Board awarded Mr. McDonnell a restricted share equity grant with a grant date fair value of $1,500,000, only 75% of his contractual target level of $2,000,000, based on the Compensation Committee’s determination that performance-based metrics had been met at 77.2% of target, and decision to further reduce the performance-based compensation to 75% of target. Also in February 2017, Mr. Jones received a restricted share equity grant with a grant date fair value of $550,000, Mr. Jackson received a restricted share equity grant with a grant date fair value of $1,000,000, and Mr. Aprahamian received a restricted share equity grant with a grant date fair value of $125,000. Each of the grants are performance-based and cliff vest after four years, subject to the achievement of performance criteria as established by the Compensation Committee.

Performance criteria related to the vesting of grants made to the named executive officers in 2017 included maintaining all required regulatory approvals and Strayer University’s regional accreditation with the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. The performance criteria incentivizes executive officers to protect and preserve the University’s ability to educate and our students’ ability to finance their education with federal funds. The grants in 2017, as described in “Identification and Analysis of 2017 Compensation Programs,” also included enhanced performance criteria with two additional metrics: (1) maintaining the University’s 90/10 percentage below 80%, and (2) maintaining the University’s cohort default rate below the national average of proprietary institutions. The Compensation Committee believes that, while financial metrics are key drivers of short-term performance, the performance criteria underpinning the performance-based equity are critical to ensure the long-term sustainability of the Company’s business model.

For the previous grants of restricted stock that vested in 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that the performance criteria had been met. The performance criteria consisted of maintaining all required regulatory approvals and Strayer University’s regional accreditation with the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. Given the regulatory environment in which Strayer University operated at the time of these grants, the Compensation Committee had determined that the criteria were both reasonably uncertain and of paramount importance to both the short-term and long-term viability of the Company. The performance criteria incentivized executive officers to ensure that the University’s ability to educate and our students’ ability to finance their education with federal funds was not jeopardized, even as regulatory risks increased for proprietary institutions of higher education.

Discretionary Bonuses:  As discussed in Part I, Item 1 in the “Overview” section, on October 29, 2017, the Company entered into a merger agreement with Capella Education Company. The execution of the merger agreement was preceded by a great deal of preparation, review, and negotiation between the two companies, in a compressed period of time. For confidentiality purposes, the Company purposefully kept the group of employees knowledgeable about, and

112


Table of Contents

involved in, the pending merger very small. Messrs. McDonnell, Silberman, Jackson, and Aprahamian were responsible for the overall management and success of the process culminating in the announcement of the merger on October 30, 2017. At the same time, all four executives remained focused on managing the Company’s day-to-day activities and maintaining the stewardship of its main asset, Strayer University.

Because of this work, which was not contemplated in early 2017 when the Compensation Committee set the annual performance objectives for  non-equity incentive compensation, the Compensation Committee determined that one-time discretionary bonuses, in addition to non-equity incentive compensation, were warranted for these NEOs. The below table sets forth the amount of discretionary bonuses awarded to these NEOs for their combined and individual contributions to the successful execution of the merger agreement: 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger-related
Discretionary Bonus

Robert S. Silberman

$

300,000

Karl McDonnell

$

300,000

Daniel W. Jackson

$

100,000

Thomas J. Aprahamian

$

30,000

Recoupment Policy

The Company has adopted a Recoupment Policy that requires each executive officer, as so designated under Rule 3b-7 of the 1934 Act, to acknowledge and agree that any award, including all non-equity incentive compensation, or equity-based compensation, will be repaid should a “Triggering Event” occur. A Triggering Event is defined in the Recoupment Policy as a decision by the Audit Committee to effect an accounting restatement of the Company’s previously published financial statements caused by material noncompliance by the Company with any financial reporting requirement due to fraud, misconduct, negligence, or lack of sufficient oversight on the part of any executive officer, or a decision by the Compensation Committee that one or more performance metrics used for determining previously paid incentive compensation was incorrectly calculated and, if calculated correctly, would have resulted in a lower payment to one or more executive officers.

Impact of Tax and Accounting Treatment

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and applicable Treasury regulations (“Section 162(m)), no deduction is allowed for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid by a publicly traded corporation to its “named executive officers”— defined as the chief executive officer, chief financial officer and the three other highest compensated executive officers (except for certain compensation that is “grandfathered” in accordance with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017). Prior to the recent passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, however, there was no limitation under Section 162(m) on the deductibility of “qualified performance-based compensation.” In general, the Company’s policy has been to maximize the extent of tax deductibility of executive compensation under the provisions of Section 162(m) so long as doing so is compatible with its determination as to the most appropriate methods and approaches for the design and delivery of compensation to the Company’s named executive officers. The Company intends to continue its practice of making a large percentage of named executive officer compensation performance-based, despite the fact that such amounts above $1 million will not be tax deductible in the future.

113


Table of Contents

Summary Compensation

The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017:

Summary Compensation Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Salary

 

Bonus (a)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive
Compensation
 (b)

 

Stock
Awards
 (c)

 

All Other
Compensation
(d)

 

Total

Robert S. Silberman,

 

2017

 

$

689,000

 

$

300,000

(e)

$

485,000

 

$

 

$

2,187

 

$

1,476,187

Executive Chairman

 

2016

 

$

676,000

 

$

 

$

635,000

 

$

2,533,500

 

$

2,130

 

$

3,846,630

 

 

2015

 

$

665,000

 

$

835,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

3,975

 

$

1,503,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Karl McDonnell,

 

2017

 

$

689,000

 

$

300,000

(e)

$

485,000

 

$

1,500,000

 

$

4,050

 

$

2,978,050

Chief Executive Officer &

 

2016

 

$

676,000

 

$

 

$

635,000

 

$

2,000,000

 

$

3,975

 

$

3,314,975

Director

 

2015

 

$

665,000

 

$

835,000

 

$

 

$

2,000,000

 

$

3,975

 

$

3,503,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel W. Jackson,

 

2017

 

$

400,000

 

$

100,000

(e)

$

170,000

 

$

1,000,000

 

$

4,050

 

$

1,674,050

Executive Vice President &

 

2016

 

$

350,000

 

$

 

$

200,000

 

$

500,000

 

$

3,975

 

$

1,053,975

Chief Financial Officer

 

2015

 

$

312,500

 

$

225,000

 

$

 

$

500,000

 

$

3,975

 

$

1,041,475

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian W. Jones,

 

2017

 

$

415,000

 

$

 

$

170,000

 

$

550,000

 

$

4,050

 

$

1,139,050

President, Strayer

 

2016

 

$

400,000

 

$

 

$

150,000

 

$

600,000

 

$

3,975

 

$

1,153,975

University

 

2015

 

$

360,577

 

$

250,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

610,577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas J. Aprahamian,

 

2017

 

$

310,000

 

$

30,000

(e)

$

45,000

 

$

125,000

 

$

4,050

 

$

514,050

Senior Vice President &

 

2016

 

$

285,000

 

$

 

$

55,000

 

$

150,000

 

$

3,975

 

$

493,975

Chief Accounting Officer

 

2015

 

$

270,000

 

$

75,000

 

$

 

$

300,000

 

$

3,975

 

$

648,975

____________

(a)      The Bonus amounts reported in this column were earned in fiscal years 2017 and 2015 and paid in fiscal years 2018 and 2016, respectively.

(b)      The Non-Equity Incentive compensation reported in this column was earned in fiscal years 2017 and 2016 and paid in fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively. See “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation” discussion above for additional detail.

(c)      The amounts shown in the columns above reflect the grant date fair value of each award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value of any dividends paid by the Company is assumed to be included in the grant date fair value of each award.

(d)      See “Supplemental All Other Compensation Table” below for additional detail.

(e)      This figure represents the amount of a one-time bonus payment, based on the executive’s service and contributions leading up to and culminating in the successful execution of the merger agreement between the Company and Capella Education Company, on October 29, 2017.

In each of 2017, 2016, and 2015, all other compensation is comprised of the Company’s match of contributions to a 401(k) plan only. The table below sets forth this information by named executive officer for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017.

114


Table of Contents

Supplemental All Other Compensation Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Company’s
401(k) Match

 

Other

 

Total All Other
Compensation

Robert S. Silberman,

 

2017

 

$

2,187

 

$

 

$

2,187

Executive Chairman

 

2016

 

$

2,130

 

$

 

$

2,130

 

 

2015

 

$

3,975

 

$

 

$

3,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Karl McDonnell,

 

2017

 

$

4,050

 

$

 

$

4,050

Chief Executive Officer & Director

 

2016

 

$

3,975

 

$

 

$

3,975

 

 

2015

 

$

3,975

 

$

 

$

3,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel W. Jackson,

 

2017

 

$

4,050

 

$

 

$

4,050

Executive Vice President &

 

2016

 

$

3,975

 

$

 

$

3,975

Chief Financial Officer

 

2015

 

$

3,975

 

$

 

$

3,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian W. Jones,

 

2017

 

$

4,050

 

$

 

$

4,050

President, Strayer University

 

2016

 

$

3,975

 

$

 

$

3,975

 

 

2015

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas J. Aprahamian,

 

2017

 

$

4,050

 

$

 

$

4,050

Senior Vice President &

 

2016

 

$

3,975

 

$

 

$

3,975

Chief Accounting Officer

 

2015

 

$

3,975

 

$

 

$

3,975

115


Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth grants of plan-based awards to the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated future payouts under non-
equity incentive plan awards

 

All Stock
Awards:

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Threshold
($)

 

Target
($)

 

Maximum
($)

 

Number of
Shares of
Stock or Units
(#)

 

Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock Awards
($)

 

Vesting   Date

Robert S. Silberman,

 

 

 430,625

 

 861,250

 

 1,291,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Chairman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Karl McDonnell,

 

2/14/17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,369

(a)

 

1,500,000

 

2/14/21

Chief Executive Officer & Director

 

 

 430,625

 

 861,250

 

 1,291,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel W. Jackson,

 

2/14/17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,246

(a)

 

1,000,000

 

2/14/21

Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer

 

 

150,000

 

300,000

 

450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian W. Jones,

 

2/14/17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,735

(a)

 

550,000

 

2/14/21

President, Strayer University

 

 

103,750

 

207,500

 

311,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas J. Aprahamian,

 

2/14/17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,531

(a)

 

125,000

 

2/14/21

Senior Vice President &
Chief Accounting Officer

 

 

38,750

 

77,500

 

116,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

____________

(a) These awards of restricted stock vest 100% on February 14, 2021, subject to satisfaction of certain performance criteria as discussed in “Equity-based Compensation.” The Company’s closing price of common stock was $81.66 on the date of these awards.

116


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following tables set forth outstanding option and stock awards of the Company’s named executive officers as of December 31, 2017.

Outstanding Option Awards Table at Fiscal Year-End

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable

 

Option
Grant
Date

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

 

Option
Full
Vesting
Date

 

Option
Expiration
Date

 

Intrinsic Value
of Stock
Options at
12/31/17
($)

Robert S. Silberman,

 

100,000

 

2/15/13

 

$

51.95

 

2/15/15

 

2/14/21

 

$

3,763,000

(a)

Executive Chairman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Karl McDonnell,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer & Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel W. Jackson,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian W. Jones,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

President, Strayer University

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas J. Aprahamian,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President &
Chief Accounting Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

____________

(a) The Company’s closing stock price of $89.58 on December 31, 2017 was compared to the option exercise price of $51.95 to determine the market value of these stock options at December 31, 2017.

117


Table of Contents

Outstanding Stock Awards Table at Fiscal Year-End

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Restricted
Stock/
Restricted Stock
Unit Award
Date

 

Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested
(#)

 

Market Value of
Shares of Stock
at 12/31/17 That
Have Not Vested
($)

 

Restricted Stock
Vesting Date

Robert S. Silberman,

 

3/22/13

 

200,000

(a)

 

17,916,000

 

2/10/19

Executive Chairman

 

2/2/16

 

50,000

(b)

 

4,479,000

 

2/10/19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Karl McDonnell,

 

5/6/14

 

46,674

(c)

 

4,181,000

 

5/6/18

Chief Executive Officer & Director

 

5/5/15

 

40,867

(d)

 

3,661,000

 

5/5/19

 

 

2/2/16

 

39,471

(e)

 

3,536,000

 

2/2/20

 

 

2/14/17

 

18,369

(f)

 

1,645,000

 

2/14/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel W. Jackson,

 

2/12/13

 

16,057

(g)

 

1,438,000

 

2/12/18

Executive Vice President &

 

2/19/14

 

4,458

(h)

 

399,000

 

2/19/18

Chief Financial Officer

 

2/4/15

 

7,128

(i)

 

639,000

 

2/4/19

 

 

2/2/16

 

9,868

(e)

 

884,000

 

2/2/20

 

 

2/14/17

 

12,246

(f)

 

1,097,000

 

2/14/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian W. Jones,

 

2/12/13

 

12,042

(g)

 

1,079,000

 

2/12/18

President, Strayer University

 

2/19/14

 

7,429

(h)

 

665,000

 

2/19/18

 

 

2/2/16

 

11,841

(e)

 

1,061,000

 

2/2/20

 

 

2/14/17

 

6,735

(f)

 

603,000

 

2/14/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas J. Aprahamian,

 

2/12/13

 

1,204

(g)

 

108,000

 

2/12/18

Senior Vice President &

 

2/19/14

 

2,972

(h)

 

266,000

 

2/19/18

Chief Accounting Officer

 

2/4/15

 

4,277

(i)

 

383,000

 

2/4/19

 

 

2/2/16

 

2,960

(j)

 

265,000

 

2/2/20

 

 

2/14/17

 

1,531

(f)

 

137,000

 

2/14/21

____________

(a) This award of restricted stock units vests 100% on February 10, 2019, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance criteria. Originally awarded as restricted stock, the award was converted to restricted stock units in 2013, the receipt of which is deferred until retirement or other termination of employment. In connection with his appointment as Executive Chairman, the Company modified the performance criteria of these restricted stock units to focus on academic accreditation and regulatory compliance.

(b)This award of restricted stock units vests 100% on February 10, 2019, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance criteria. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $50.67 on the date of these awards.

(c)This award of restricted stock vests 100% on May 6, 2018, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance criteria. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $42.85 on the date of this award.

(d)This award of restricted stock vests 100% on May 5, 2019, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance criteria. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $48.94 on the date of these awards.

(e)These awards of restricted stock vest 100% on February 2, 2020, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance criteria. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $50.67 on the date of these awards.

(f)These awards of restricted stock vest 100% on February 14, 2021, subject to the satisfaction of certain performance criteria. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $81.66 on the date of these awards.

(g)These awards of restricted stock vest 100% on February 12, 2018. The award for Mr. Jackson is subject to the satisfaction of certain performance criteria. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $62.28 on the date of these awards.

(h)These awards of restricted stock vest 100% on February 19, 2018. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $33.65 on the date of these awards.

118


Table of Contents

(i)These awards of restricted stock vest 100% on February 4, 2019. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $70.15 on the date of these awards.

(j)This award of restricted stock vests 100% on February 2, 2020. The Company’s closing price of common stock was $50.67 on the date of these awards. This award was originally time-based vesting only. However, recognizing that Mr. Aprahamian would be designated as a named executive officer for 2016, on February 15, 2017 the restricted stock award was amended, with approval by the Compensation Committee and Mr. Aprahamian’s concurrence, to provide for the satisfaction of certain performance criteria for vesting as discussed in “Equity-based Compensation.”

Options Exercised and Restricted Stock Vested at Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table sets forth the number of shares of restricted stock that vested during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 for each of the named executive officers and the value realized upon the vesting of such shares. None of the named executive officers exercised stock options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Vested

 

Name

 

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
(#)

 

 

Value Realized on Vesting
($)

 

Robert S. Silberman,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Chairman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Karl McDonnell,

 

 

50,150

 

 

 

4,602,641

 

Chief Executive Officer & Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel W. Jackson,

 

 

1,298

 

 

 

99,375

 

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian Jones,

 

 

 

 

 

 

President, Strayer University

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas J. Aprahamian,

 

 

606

 

 

 

46,395

 

Senior Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

In 2017, Mr. Silberman and Mr. McDonnell were the only named executive officers with employment contracts, and both agreements provide for a double-trigger change of  control termination clause. In the event that Mr. Silberman is terminated by the Company without cause, he is entitled to receive a lump sum payment of three years’ salary, which would currently total approximately $2.0 million, and all restricted stock units and options previously granted to him shall immediately vest. If Mr. Silberman is terminated without cause within six months of a change of control, or there occurs a material reduction in his authority, function, duties, or responsibilities which causes his resignation within six months of a change of control, Mr. Silberman is entitled to receive a lump sum payment of three times his annual base salary plus three times his latest previous annual non-equity incentive compensation award actually paid. (A change of control is defined in the contract as the acquisition of more than 50% of the voting stock of the Company or the acquisition of combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, completion of a merger or other business combination resulting in a change in control of more than 50% of the voting stock of the Company, election of a substantially different Board of Directors or approval by stockholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.) Consistent with the agreement with Mr. Silberman in effect since 2001, Mr. Silberman is entitled to three years of medical benefits following a termination without cause (estimated cost of $45,000). Mr. Silberman is not entitled to a gross-up payment for any excise taxes which may be imposed on termination payments. The agreement also contains covenants restricting Mr. Silberman from competing with the Company for six years after his termination of employment and requiring Mr. Silberman to keep confidential the Company’s proprietary information.

119


Table of Contents

In the event that Mr. McDonnell is terminated by the Company without cause, he is entitled to receive a lump sum payment of three years’ salary (which would currently total approximately $2.0 million), up to three years’ medical benefits, and all restricted stock awards shall immediately vest. If Mr. McDonnell is terminated without cause within six months of a change in control, or there occurs a material reduction in his authority, function, duties, or responsibilities which causes his resignation within six months of a change in control, Mr. McDonnell is entitled to the same payments and benefits as in any other termination without cause, plus three times his latest previous annual non-equity incentive compensation award actually paid. (A change in control is defined in the same manner as in Mr. Silberman’s employment agreement.) Mr. McDonnell is not entitled to a gross-up payment for any excise taxes which may be imposed on termination payments. The agreement also contains covenants restricting Mr. McDonnell from competing with the Company for six years after his termination of employment and requiring Mr. McDonnell to keep confidential the Company’s proprietary information.

All stock options and restricted stock awards made in 2013 and thereafter contain a double-trigger change in control vesting clause. That is, the options and awards vest in connection with a change in control only if such change in control results in (1) termination of employment by the Company without cause within six months of the effective date of the change in control; or (2) the occurrence of a material reduction in the officers’ authority, functions, duties, or responsibilities which causes the executives’ resignation from the Company within six months of the effective date of the change in control.

The value attributable to the accelerated vesting of stock-based awards resulting from a termination in connection with a change in control is set forth below, assuming the change of  control occurred on December 31, 2017, when the closing price of the Company’s common stock was $89.58.

Name

Value Realized
Upon Vesting
Due to Change
in Control with
Termination
($)

Robert S. Silberman

26,158,000

Karl McDonnell

13,023,000

Daniel W. Jackson

4,457,000

Brian W. Jones

3,408,000

Thomas J. Aprahamian

1,159,000

Compensation Committee Report

The Company has established a standing Compensation Committee. During fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee was composed of Messrs. Wargo (Chair), Brock, and Milano. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section with management and, based on the review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board to include this information in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Compensationthereto, “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

ForParticipation” and “Compensation Committee Report” to be contained in the year endedCompany’s Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days following December 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee was composed of Messrs. Wargo (Chair), Brock, and Milano. No member of the Compensation Committee was, during fiscal year 2017, an officer or employee of the Company or was formerly an officer of the Company, or had any relationship requiring disclosure by the Company as a related party transaction under applicable SEC rules. No executive officer of the Company served on any board of directors or compensation committee of any other company for which any of the Company’s directors served as an executive officer at any time during fiscal year 2017.2018.

120


Table of Contents

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our median employee and the annual total compensation of Mr. Karl McDonnell, our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”).

For 2017, our last completed fiscal year:

·

the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company was, as of December 31, 2017 (other than our CEO and adjunct faculty members), $64,010; and

·

the annual total compensation of our CEO was $2,978,050.

Based on this information, for 2017 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. McDonnell, our CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of all Company employees was 47 to 1, which was determined as follows:

1.

We determined that, as of December 31, 2017, our employee population consisted of approximately 1,470 individuals, all located in the United States. This population consisted of our full-time faculty, full-time non-faculty staff, and part-time non-faculty staff.

a.

We did not include adjunct faculty in this population, because no such adjunct faculty were employed with us on December 31, 2017. Adjunct faculty provide services for a limited period of time during academic quarters, and no adjunct faculty were under contract on December 31, 2017.

2.

To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we compared the total compensation of our employees as reflected in our payroll records.

a.

In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of approximately 300 employees who were hired in 2017 but did not work for us for the entire fiscal year.

3.

We identified our median employees using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in the calculation. Since all our employees are located in the United States, as is our CEO, we did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the “median employee”.

4.

Once we identified our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2017 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $64,010.

5.

With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the “Summary Compensation Table,” set forth above.

Director Compensation

Director compensation is designed to:

·

Align with long-term stockholder interests;

·

Ensure the Company can attract and retain outstanding director candidates;

·

Recognize the time commitments necessary to oversee the Company; and

·

Support the independence of thought required of a good director.

The Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors reviews non-employee director compensation regularly and presents recommendations to the full Board for discussion and approval. Current director compensation is as follows:

·

Annual Retainer. Each eligible director is paid an annual fee of $150,000. Of this amount, at least 50% (or $75,000) of the annual fee must be paid in shares of restricted stock of the Company. Restricted stock is issued to directors on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders as part of their annual retainer. The restricted shares vest over three years, with one-third of the shares vesting each year on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Directors may choose to receive the remaining 50% of their annual retainer ($75,000) in either restricted stock or in cash, paid in quarterly installments. In the event any director retires or resigns from

121


Table of Contents

the Board, the Board of Directors may, in its discretion, waive the remaining vesting period(s) for all or any portion of unvested restricted shares, provided that the departing director has served at least five years on the Board of Directors of the Company.

·

Additional Fees. The Audit Committee Chair and the Presiding Independent Director receive an additional annual fee of $10,000. Members of the Audit Committee receive an additional annual fee of $5,000. The Board may also approve additional fees for other board-related service.

·

Reimbursement of Expenses. Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and Committee meetings.

As described above, a significant portion of director compensation is paid in restricted stock to align director compensation with the long term interests of stockholders. While serving on the Board, non-employee directors receive the same cash dividends on shares of restricted stock as a holder of regular common stock.

The following table sets forth compensation for each non-employee director for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Messrs. Silberman and McDonnell do not receive any additional compensation for their service as directors of the Company. Their compensation is reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” set forth below in this proxy statement.

Director Compensation Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)

 

Stock Awards
($)
(a)

 

Total
($)

Dr. Charlotte F. Beason

 

75,000

 

75,000

 

150,000

Sen. William E. Brock

 

75,000

 

75,000

 

150,000

Dr. John T. Casteen, III

 

85,000

 

75,000

 

160,000

Nathaniel C. Fick

 

80,000

 

94,645

 

174,645

Robert R. Grusky

 

75,000

 

75,000

 

150,000

Todd A. Milano

 

40,000

 

110,000

 

150,000

G. Thomas Waite, III

 

85,000

 

75,000

 

160,000

J. David Wargo

 

80,000

 

75,000

 

155,000

____________

(a) Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value computation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

122


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the number of outstanding and unvested shares of restricted stock held by each non-employee director at December 31, 2017.

Outstanding Stock Awards Table

Name

Shares of
Unvested
Restricted
Stock (#)

Dr. Charlotte F. Beason

2,390

Sen. William E. Brock

2,390

Dr. John T. Casteen, III

2,390

Nathaniel C. Fick

1,470

Robert R. Grusky

2,561

Todd A. Milano

3,608

G. Thomas Waite, III

2,390

J. David Wargo

2,390

 

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 

Securities

The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Set forthPlans” to be contained in the table below is information pertaining to securities authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans as ofProxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days following December 31, 2017. There are options and restricted stock units but no warrants existing under these plans.

Equity Compensation Plan Information
as of December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan Category

 

Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
(a)

 

Weighted
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
(b)

 

Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
column(a))
(c)

Equity compensation plans previously approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015 Equity Compensation Plan which replaced the 2011 Equity Compensation Plan as amended

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

259,046

2011 Equity Compensation Plan which replaced the 1996 Stock Option Plan as amended

 

300,000

 

$

51.95

 (1)

 

Equity compensation plans not previously approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

350,000

 

$

51.95

 

 

259,046

___________

(1)  The weighted average covers the 100,000 stock options and not the 200,000 restricted stock units.

123


Table of Contents

Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2017 (except as otherwise indicated), by each person known by management of the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, each of the Company’s directors and director nominees, its Executive Chairman, CEO, and three other named executive officers and all executive officers and directors as a group. The information presented in the table is based upon the most recent filings with the SEC by those persons or upon information otherwise provided by those persons to the Company. The percentages reflected in the table for each beneficial owner are calculated based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2017 plus those shares of common stock that are subject to options held by the applicable beneficial owner that are currently exercisable or exercisable within sixty days of December 31, 2017 and those shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units held by the applicable beneficial owner within sixty days of December 31, 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
(a)

 

Common
Stock
Issuable within
60 days

 

Total

 

Percentage
Owned

Stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (b)

 

1,886,459

 

0

 

1,886,459

 

16.9

%

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. (c)

 

1,212,312

 

0

 

1,212,312

 

10.9

%

The Vanguard Group (d)

 

1,115,808

 

0

 

1,115,808

 

10.0

%

Capital Research & Management Co. (World Investors) (e)

 

845,750

 

0

 

845,750

 

7.6

%

Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert S. Silberman

 

271,802

 

100,000

 

371,802

 

3.3

%

Dr. Charlotte F. Beason

 

13,732

 

0

 

13,732

 

*

 

Sen. William E. Brock

 

8,113

 

0

 

8,113

 

*

 

Dr. John T. Casteen, III

 

8,831

 

0

 

8,831

 

*

 

Nathaniel C. Fick

 

1,660

 

0

 

1,660

 

*

 

Robert R. Grusky

 

12,348

 

0

 

12,348

 

*

 

Karl McDonnell

 

150,205

 

0

 

150,205

 

1.3

%

Todd A. Milano

 

22,250

 

0

 

22,250

 

*

 

G. Thomas Waite, III

 

11,142

 

0

 

11,142

 

*

 

J. David Wargo

 

10,282

 

0

 

10,282

 

*

 

Named Executive Officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian W. Jones

 

38,047

 

0

 

38,047

 

*

 

Daniel W. Jackson

 

50,947

 

0

 

50,947

 

*

 

Thomas J. Aprahamian

 

13,913

 

0

 

13,913

 

*

 

All Executive Officers and Directors (13 persons)

 

613,272

 

100,000

 

713,272

 

6.3

%

____________

*  represents amounts less than 1%

124


Table of Contents

(a)For directors and officers, the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned includes shares of restricted stock, which the holder is entitled to vote, and restricted stock units.

(b)Based on a Schedule 13F filed with the SEC on November 15, 2017. These securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors including T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund, Inc. (which owns 1,432,264 shares, representing 12.8% of the shares outstanding), which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”) serves as investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote securities. For purposes of the reporting requirement of the 1934 Act, Price Associates is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities. The address is: 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.

(c)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January  19, 2018. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is: 55 East 52 nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(d)Based on a Schedule 13F filed with the SEC on November 15, 2017. The address of The Vanguard Group is: 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(e)Based on a Schedule 13F filed with the SEC on November 15, 2017. The address of Capital Research & Management Co. is: 333 S. Hope St., Los Angeles, CA, 90071.

 

 

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain

The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Board Structure” and “Certain Transactions with Related Parties

The Company had no transactions with related parties during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 that would needParties” to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K. The Company prohibits conflict of interest activities, which includes within that definition related party transactions, by any director or officer, or persons related thereto, unless specifically approved in advance and in writing by the General Counsel, CEO, and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors after full disclosure of all aspects of the activity. A conflict of interest is defined generally to include situations where a person (i) has a private interest that materially conflicts or interferes with the interests of the Company, (ii) has a material personal interest that will impair the person’s ability to perform his or her work objectively and effectively, or (iii) derives a material personal benefit as a result of the person performing services for the Company. Among the other circumstances that may be considered conflicts of interest, any engagement in a personal business transaction involving the Company for profit or gain will be considered a conflict of interest requiring advance approval under the Code of Business Conduct. The Company’s policy prohibiting conflict of interest activities is further described in the Code of Business Conduct.

Our Board is comprised of independent members, as independence is defined under the NASDAQ Listing Standards, along with our Executive Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer, who are full-time employees and are not considered independent. In 2013, Dr. Casteen was appointed Presiding Independent Director, who runs the Board in the Chairman’s absence. The Presiding Independent Director presides at meetings of the Board of Directors without the Executive Chairman and the CEO present at least quarterly (at each regularly scheduled Board meeting) and solicits candid feedback on the Executive Chairman’s and the CEO’s performance. The Presiding Independent Director serves as the principal liaison on Board issues between the independent directors and the Executive Chairman and has the authority to:

·

Call meetings of the independent directors; 

·

Ensure the quality, quantity, and timeliness of information to the Board; and

·

Consult and communicate with stockholders.

The Board and its Compensation Committee continually evaluate the Company’s strategy, activities, and in particular, compensation policies and practices, to protect against inappropriate risk taking. Any compensation program that seeks to pay managers for performance on behalf of owners carries some risk of overzealous performance. But paramountcontained in the Company’s compensation program is an unwavering requirement that executive conduct conform to applicable legal, regulatory, and ethical business standards. Based on its evaluation and the views of advisors, the Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s executive compensation program, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above, does not encourage inappropriate risk taking and that the Company has in place a strong culture, organization structure, and compliance policies to manage operational risk effectively.

125


Table of Contents

Board Committees

The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating Committee, each composed entirely of independent directors. The current Committee membership is as follows:

Committee Memberships

Audit

Compensation

Nominating

G. Thomas Waite, Chair

J. David Wargo, Chair

Dr. John T. Casteen, III, Chair

Nathaniel C. Fick

Sen. William E. Brock

Dr. Charlotte F. Beason

J. David Wargo

Todd A. Milano

Robert R. Grusky

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the quality and integrity of our accounting, auditing, and reporting practices. Pursuant to the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee performs a variety of tasks, including being directly responsible for the appointment (subject to advisory stockholder ratification), compensation, and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also, among other things, reviews the Company’s accounting policies, unaudited quarterly earnings releases, and periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including the Company’s financial statements, and regularly reports to the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee relies on the expertise and knowledge of management, the internal auditor, and the independent auditors in carrying out its oversight responsibilities.

The Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent, as independence is defined under the NASDAQ Listing Standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the 1934 Act. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Waite and Wargo qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC rules, based on their education, experience, and background.

Compensation Committee

For the year endedProxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days following December 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee was composed of Messrs. Wargo (Chair), Brock, and Milano.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for evaluating, and recommending to the full Board for approval, the compensation of the Executive Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer, and other officers of the Company. The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining compensation policies and practices, changes in compensation and benefits for management, employee benefits, and all other matters relating to employee compensation, including matters relating to stock-based compensation, subject to the approval of the full Board.

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant hired by the Compensation Committee to assist in the evaluation of director and executive compensation. During 2017,  approximately $10,000 was paid to Lockton Companies, LLC to benchmark compensation for the CEO and CFO positions. The Compensation Committee may form and delegate any of its authority to one or more subcommittees as it deems appropriate. For a discussion of the role of the Executive Chairman and the CEO in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above. The Compensation Committee met twice during 2017.

The Compensation Committee has adopted a written charter, which was last amended on February 2, 2016, and restated on February 13, 2018, and a copy of which the Company will provide to any person without charge, upon request. Persons wishing to make such a request should contact Daniel W. Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 2303 Dulles Station Blvd., Herndon, VA 20171, (703) 561-1600. In addition, the Compensation Committee charter is available on the Company’s website, www.strayereducation.com.

The Board has determined that all of the members of the Compensation Committee are independent, as independence is defined under the NASDAQ Listing Standards. The Board also has determined that all of the members

126


Table of Contents

of the Compensation Committee qualify as “non-employee directors” as defined by SEC rules and “outside directors” as defined by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Nominating Committee

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Nominating Committee was composed of Dr. Casteen (Chair), Dr. Beason, and Mr. Grusky. The Nominating Committee is responsible for establishing qualifications for potential directors, considering and recommending prospective candidates for Board membership, recommending the Board committee structure, making recommendations as to director independence, developing and monitoring the Company’s corporate governance principles, and recommending director compensation.

The Board has determined that all of the members of the Nominating Committee are independent, as independence is defined under the NASDAQ Listing Standards.2018.

 

Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services 

Set forth below are

The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the services rendered and related fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 2016 and 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

2017

Audit Fees (1)

 

$

          979,500

 

$

      1,147,000

Audit-related fees (2)

 

 

 

 

163,695

Tax Fees (3)

 

 

          106,668

 

 

         134,498

All other fees (4)

 

 

1,800

 

 

1,800

Total fees

 

$

1,087,968

 

$

1,446,993

(1)

Audit fees include fees for the annual audit of the consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of our interim financial statements, SEC registration statements, and other filings. The increasesection entitled “Proposal 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” to be contained in 2017 is due to fees incurred in connection with the filing of a registration statement on Form S-4 related to the merger with Capella Education Company.

(2)

Audit-related fees consisted of due diligence services related to the merger with Capella Education Company.

(3)

Tax fees relate to professional services for tax compliance, advice, and planning services.

(4)

All other fees consisted of non-audit and accounting research services.

It is the Audit Committee’s policy to pre-approve all audit and non-audit related services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. All of the services described above were pre-approved by the Company’s Audit Committee.

Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days following December 31, 2018.

PART IV

 

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(A)(1) Financial Statements

 

All required financial statements of the registrant are set forth under Item 8 of this report on Form 10-K.

 

(A)(2) Financial Statement Schedule

 

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 

127


Table of Contents

(A)(3) Exhibits

 

The exhibits required to be filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.

 

121


Table of ContentsItem 16.     Item 10-K Summary

Exhibit Index

 

Exhibit
Number

Description

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Company, Capella and Sarg Sub Inc., dated as of October 29, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 30, 2017).

3.1

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 1, 2018).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 1, 2018).

4.1

Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 of Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-3967) filed with the Commission on July 16, 1996).

10.1

Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2012, among the Company, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders and agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 9, 2012).

10.2

First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2015, among the Company, Strayer University, LLC, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 8, 2015).

10.3

Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2018, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company party thereto as subsidiary guarantors, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 1, 2018).

10.4

Supplement and Joinder Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2015, among the Company, Strayer University, LLC, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, and other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 8, 2015).

10.5†

Employment Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2001, between Strayer Education, Inc. and Robert S. Silberman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-21039) filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002).

10.6†

Transition Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2017, between Capella Education Company and J. Kevin Gilligan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-21039) filed with the Commission on November 8, 2018).

10.7†

Strayer Education, Inc. 2011 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement (File No. 000-21039) filed with the Commission on March 29, 2011).

10.8†

Strayer Education, Inc. 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on March 13, 2015).

Not applicable.

122


Table of Contents

10.9†

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement — Time Based — under the 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015).

10.10†

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement — Performance Based — under the 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015).

10.11†

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015).

10.12†

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015).

10.13†

Strategic Education, Inc. 2018 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on November 8, 2018).

10.14†*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement — Time Based — under the 2018 Equity Compensation Plan.

10.15†*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement — Performance Based — under the 2018 Equity Compensation Plan.

10.16†*

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2018 Equity Compensation Plan.

10.17†*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement – Non-Employee Director – under the 2018 Equity Compensation Plan

10.18†

Capella Education Company 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Capella Education Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the Commission on June 6, 2005).

10.19†

Capella Education Company 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Capella Education Company’s definitive Proxy Statement (File No. 1-33140) for its 2014 annual meeting of shareholders filed with the Commission on March 24, 2014).

10.20†*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement – Time Based – under the Capella Education Company 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.

10.21†*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement – Performance Based – under the Capella Education Company 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.

10.22†*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement – Non-Employee Director – under the Capella Education Company 2014 Equity Compensation Plan.

21.1*

Subsidiaries of Registrant.

23.1*

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

24.1*

Power of Attorney (included in signature page hereto).

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Act.

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Act.

32.1**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*

XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL*

XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB*

XBRL Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE*

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*

XBRL Definition Linkbase Document


*Filed herewith.

128123


 

Table of Contents

**Furnished herewith.

Denotes management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.

Item 16.     Item 10-K Summary

Not applicable.

124


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

STRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC.

By:

/s/ Karl McDonnell

Karl McDonnell

Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 1, 2019

125


Table of Contents

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Karl McDonnell and Daniel W. Jackson, and each of them individually, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and his or her name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign the report and any and all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.

 

SIGNATURES

    

TITLE

    

DATE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Robert S. Silberman

 

Executive Chairman of the Board

 

March 1, 20182019

Robert S. Silberman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ J. Kevin Gilligan

Executive Vice Chairman and Director

March 1, 2019

J. Kevin Gilligan

/s/ Karl McDonnell

 

Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

March 1, 20182019

Karl McDonnell

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Daniel W. Jackson

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

March 1, 20182019

Daniel W. Jackson

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Thomas J. Aprahamian

 

Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

 

March 1, 20182019

Thomas J. Aprahamian

 

(Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Charlotte F. Beason

 

Director

 

March 1, 20182019

Charlotte F. Beason

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ William E. BrockRita D. Brogley

 

Director

 

March 1, 20182019

William E. BrockRita D. Brogley

/s/ H. James Dallas

Director

March 1, 2019

H. James Dallas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ John T. Casteen, III

 

Director

 

March 1, 20182019

John T. Casteen, III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Nathaniel C. Fick

 

Director

 

March 1, 20182019

Nathaniel C. Fick

 

 

 

 

126


Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Robert R. Grusky

 

Director

 

March 1, 20182019

Robert R. Grusky

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Todd A. Milano

 

Director

 

March 1, 20182019

129


Table of Contents

Todd A. Milano

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ G. Thomas Waite, III

 

Director

 

March 1, 20182019

G. Thomas Waite, III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ J. David Wargo

 

Director

 

March 1, 20182019

J. David Wargo

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit Index

Exhibit
Number

Description

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Company, Capella and Sarg Sub Inc., dated as of October 29, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 30, 2017).

3.1

Amended Articles of Incorporation and Articles Supplementary of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-21039) filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 4, 2010).

4.1

Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 of Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-3967) filed with the Commission on July 16, 1996).

10.1

Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2012, among the Company, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders and agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 9, 2012).

10.2

First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2015, among the Company, Strayer University, LLC, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 8, 2015).

10.3

Supplement and Joinder Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2015, among the Company, Strayer University, LLC, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, and other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 8, 2015).

10.4†

Employment Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2001, between Strayer Education, Inc. and Robert S. Silberman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-21039) filed with the Commission on March 28, 2002).

10.5†

Strayer Education, Inc. 2011 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement (File No. 000-21039) filed with the Commission on March 29, 2011).

130


Table of Contents

10.6†

Strayer Education, Inc. 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on March 13, 2015).

10.7†

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement — Time Based — under the 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015).

10.8†

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement — Performance Based — under the 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015).

10.9†

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2015 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015).

10.10†

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the 2011 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015.

21.1*

Subsidiaries of Registrant.

23.1*

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

24.1*

Power of Attorney (included in signature page hereto).

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Act.

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Act.

32.1**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*

XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL*

XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB*

XBRL Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE*

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*

XBRL Definition Linkbase Document


*Filed herewith.

131


Table of Contents

**Furnished herewith.

Denotes management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.

132


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

STRAYER EDUCATION, INC.

By:

/s/ Karl McDonnell

Karl McDonnell

Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 1, 2018

133127