Property locations
Mexico properties
Mexico Properties, Showing States of Chihuahua and Durango, Mexico
10
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13627
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE | 26-4413382 | |
(State of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
350 Indiana Street, Suite | | |
Golden, Colorado | | 80401 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(303) (303) 839-5060
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Trading Symbol | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | AUMN | NYSE American |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ ◻No ☒⌧
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ ◻No ☒⌧
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒⌧ No ☐◻
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒⌧ No ☐◻
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐Non accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒ Emerging growth company ☐ |
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 20182021 was approximately $17.9$75.42 million, based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock of $0.34$0.61 per share on the NYSE American on June 30, 2018.2021. For the purpose of this calculation, the registrant has assumed that its affiliates as of June 30, 20182021 included all directors and officers and one shareholder that held approximately 43%23.1% of its outstanding common stock. The number of shares of common stock outstanding on February 27, 2019March 22, 2022, was 96,399,391.162,804,612.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20182021
INDEX
| | |
| | PAGE |
PART I | | |
8 | ||
| ||
44 | ||
59 | ||
59 | ||
59 | ||
PART II | | |
59 | ||
59 | ||
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 59 | |
71 | ||
71 | ||
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | ||
71 | ||
71 | ||
72 | ||
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS | 72 | |
| | |
73 | ||
73 | ||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | 73 | |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE | 73 | |
73 | ||
| | |
74 | ||
75 | ||
| 75 | |
80 | ||
2
References to “Golden Minerals, the “Company,” “our,” “we,” or “us” mean Golden Minerals Company, its predecessors and consolidated subsidiaries, or any one or more of them, as the context requires. Many of the terms used in our industry are technical in nature. We have included a glossary of some of these terms below.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some information contained in or incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other applicable securities laws. We use the words “anticipate,” “continue,” “likely,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “project,” “should,” “believe” and similar expressions (including negative and grammatical variations) to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include comments relating to our plans, expectations and assumptions concerning the Velardeña oxide plant lease, including the expected term, anticipated revenues, care and maintenance costs, and potential future tailings expansion; the El Quevar project, including assumptions and projections contained in the El Quevar PEA (including life of mine, grade and production expectations); the Santa Maria property, including(i) the assumptions and projections contained in the Santa Maria PEA (includingRodeo Technical Report Summary, including estimated mineral resources; (ii) projections regarding the Rodeo mine for 2022, including production, payable extraction, anticipated grades, estimated unit costs and net operating margin; (iii) the anticipated life of mine, grade and production expectations), and other expectations regarding the project, including future drilling plans, timing of initial drill results, expansion potential for the existing deposit and general cost expectations; the Rodeo property,mine; (iv) the assumptions and projections contained in the Velardeña Technical Report Summary, including our generalestimated mineral resources; (v) the potential restart of mining activities at Velardeña; (vi) future evaluation plans and cost expectations; the Yoquivo project, including future drilling plans and exploration activities;activities at our exploration properties, including Yoquivo and Sarita Este; (vii) our financial outlook in 2019,for 2022, including anticipated incomeexpenditures and expenditurescash inflows during the year; expected(viii) our ability to recover VAT receivable in Mexico and the timing of such recovery; and (ix) the potential need for external financing and statements concerning our financial condition, business strategies and business and legal risks. Although we believe the expectations and assumptions reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that these expectations and assumptions will prove to be correct. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors described in this annual report on Form 10-K, including:
● | Timing, duration and overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including potential future suspension of mining activities at the Rodeo Property or processing activities at our Velardeña mill as a result of future orders of the Mexican Federal Government; |
Lower revenue
● | Deviations from the projected timing and amount of estimated production at Rodeo due to unanticipated variations in grade, unexpected challenges associated with our proposed mining plan, volatility in commodity prices, variations in expected recoveries, increases in projected operating or capital costs or interruptions in mineral extraction; |
|
|
Decreases or insufficient increases in silver and gold prices;
Whether we are able to raise the necessary capital required to continue our business on terms acceptable to us or at all, and the likely negative effect of low silver and gold prices or unfavorable exploration results;
Unfavorable results from exploration at the Santa Maria, Rodeo, Yoquivo, Navegantes or other exploration properties and whether we will be able to advance these or other exploration properties;
●Risks related to the El Quevar project in Argentina, including unfavorable results from our evaluation activities the feasibility and economic viability and unexpected costs of maintaining the project, and whether we will be ablethe option with respect to find a joint venture partner or secure adequate financingthe El Quevar project is exercised pursuant to further advance the project; terms of the Earn-In Agreement;
● | Decreases in silver and gold prices; |
● | Whether we are able to raise the necessary capital required to continue our business on terms acceptable to us or at all, and the likely negative effect of volatility in silver and gold prices or unfavorable exploration results; |
● | Unfavorable results from exploration at the Yoquivo, Sarita Este, Sand Canyon or other exploration properties and whether we will be able to advance these or other exploration properties; |
3
Variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that are or may be located at the Velardeña Properties or our exploration properties, changes in interpretations of geological information, and unfavorable results of metallurgical and other tests;
● |
|
● | The Rodeo project, including assumptions and projections contained in the Rodeo PEA (including life of mine and mineral extraction expectations), and our plans regarding further advancement of the project; |
● | Variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that are or may be located at the Rodeo and Velardeña properties or our exploration properties, changes in interpretations of geological information, and unfavorable results of metallurgical and other tests; |
| ● | Whether we will be able to continue or begin to mine and sell minerals successfully or profitably at any of our current properties at current or future silver and gold prices and achieve our objective of becoming a mid-tier mining company; |
● | Potential delays in our exploration activities or other activities to advance properties towards mining resulting from environmental consents or permitting delays or problems, accidents, problems with contractors, disputes under agreements related to exploration properties, unanticipated costs and other unexpected events; |
Potential delays in our exploration activities or other activities to advance properties towards mining resulting from environmental consents or permitting delays or problems, accidents, problems with contractors, disputes under agreements related to exploration properties, unanticipated costs and other unexpected events;
Our ability to retain key management and mining personnel necessary to successfully operate and grow our business;
Economic and political events affecting the market prices for gold, silver, zinc, lead and other minerals that may be found on our exploration properties;
Political and economic instability in Argentina, Mexico and other countries in which we conduct our business and future actions of any of these governments with respect to nationalization of natural resources or other changes in mining or taxation policies;
● |
|
● | Economic and political events affecting the market prices for gold, silver, zinc, lead and other minerals that may be found on our exploration properties; |
● | Political and economic instability in Argentina, Mexico and other countries in which we conduct our business and future actions of any of these governments with respect to nationalization of natural resources or other changes in mining or taxation policies; |
| ● | Our ability to acquire additional concessions in Mexico based on the economic and environmental policies of Mexico’s current or future governmental authorities; |
| ● | Volatility in the market price of our common stock; and |
● | The factors set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this annual report on Form 10-K. |
The factors set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this annual report on Form 10-K.
Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such expectations may prove to be materially incorrect due to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. You should not unduly rely on any of our forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us and persons acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this section and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL
“Mineralized material” as used in this annual report on Form 10-K, although permissible under the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards. We cannot be certain that any deposits at the Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar, Santa Maria or Rodeo properties or any deposits at our other exploration properties, will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves”. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the disclosed mineralized material estimates will ever be confirmed or converted into reserves or that mineralized material can be economically or legally extracted. In addition, in this annual report on Form 10-K we also modify our estimates made in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 to conform to SEC Industry Guide 7 for reporting in the United States. Mineralized material is substantially equivalent to measured and indicated mineral resources (exclusive of reserves) as disclosed for reporting purposes in Canada, except that the SEC only permits issuers to report “mineralized material” in tonnage and average grade without reference to contained ounces.
4
CONVERSION TABLE
In this annual report on Form 10-K, figures are presented in both United States standard and metric measurements. Conversion rates from United States standard measurement systems to metric and metric to United States standard measurement systems are provided in the table below. All currency references in this annual report on Form 10-K are to United States dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
| | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Unit | Metric Measure | Metric Unit | U.S. Measure | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 1 acre |
| 0.4047 hectares | | 1 hectare | | 2.47 acres | |
| 1 foot |
| 0.3048 meters | | 1 meter | | 3.28 feet | |
| 1 mile |
| 1.609 kilometers | | 1 kilometer | | 0.62 miles | |
| 1 ounce (troy) |
| 31.103 grams | | 1 gram | | 0.032 ounces (troy) | |
| 1 ton |
| 0.907 tonnes | | 1 tonne | | 1.102 tons | |
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED MINING TERMS
“Base Metal” means a classification of non-ferrous metals usually considered to be of low value and higher chemical activity when compared with the precious metals (gold, silver, platinum, etc.). This nonspecific term generally refers to the high-volume, low-value metals copper, lead, tin, and zinc.
“Breccia” means rock consisting of fragments, more or less angular, in a matrix of finer-grained material or of cementing material.
“Calcareous Clastic” means sedimentary rock composed of siliciclastic particles usually of conglomerate, sand, or silt-size and cemented by calcium carbonate in the form of calcite.
“Claim” means a mining interest giving its holder the right to prospect, explore for and exploit minerals within a defined area.
“Concentrates” means the cleanpartially cleaned product of ore or metalpotentially economically interesting metal-bearing minerals separated from its containing rock or earth by froth flotation or other methods of mineral separation.
“Concession” means a grant or lease of a tract of land made by a government or other controlling authority in return for stipulated services or a promise that the land will be used for a specific purpose.
“Core Drill” means a rotary type of rock drill that cuts a core of rock and is recovered in long cylindrical sections, usually two centimeters or more in diameter.
“Deposit” means an informal term for an accumulation of minerals.
“Development Stage” means a project with an established resource, not in production, engaged in the process of additional studies preparing for completion of a feasibility study or for commercial extraction.
“Diorite” means a grey to dark grey intermediate intrusive igneous rock composed principally of plagioclase feldspar, biotite, hornblende, and/or pyroxene.
“Epithermal Calcite-Quartz” means deposits, typically occurring in veins, of calcite-quartz from hydrothermal fluids at shallow depths under conditions in the lower ranges of temperature and pressure.
5
“Euhedral” means a well-developed degree of which mineral grains show external crystal faces.
5
“Exploration Stage” means a projectproperty that is not yet in either the Development Stage or Production Stage.has no mineral reserves disclosed.
“Feasibility StudyExploration Target” means an engineering study designed to definea statement or estimate of the technical, economic, and legal viabilityexploration potential of a miningmineral deposit in a defined geological setting where the statement or estimate, quoted as a range of tonnage and a range of grade (or quality), relates to mineralization for which there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a mineral resource.
“Feasibility Study” means a comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral project, which includes detailed assessments of all applicable modifying factors, as defined by this section, together with any other relevant operational factors, and detailed financial analysis that are necessary to demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that extraction is economically viable. The results of the study may serve as the basis for a high degreefinal decision by a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or finance, the development of reliability.the project.
“Flotation” means the separating of finely crushed minerals from one another by causing some to float in a froth and others to remain in suspension in the pulp. Oils and various chemicals are used to activate, make floatable, or depress the minerals.
“Formation” means a distinct layer of sedimentary or volcanic rock of similar composition.
“Fracture System” means a set or group of contemporaneous fractures formed by a stress system.
“Grade” means the metal content of ore,mineralized material which for precious metals is usually expressed in troy ounces per ton (2,000 pounds) or in grams per metric tonnes, which contain 2,204.6 pounds or 1,000 kilograms.
“Indicated mineral resource” means that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because an indicated mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than the level of confidence of a measured mineral resource, an indicated mineral resource may only be converted to a probable mineral reserve.
“Inferred mineral resource” means that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Because an inferred mineral resource has the lowest level of geological confidence of all mineral resources, which prevents the application of the modifying factors in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability, an inferred mineral resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project,and may not be converted to a mineral reserve.
“Laramide Orogeny” means a period of mountain building in western North America, which started in the Late Cretaceous age, 70 to 80 million years ago, and ended 35 to 55 million years ago.
“Measured mineral resource” means that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of conclusive geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with a measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because a measured mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than the level of confidence of either an indicated mineral resource or an inferred mineral resource, a measured mineral resource may be converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral reserve.
“Mineralization” means the concentration of metals within a body of rock.
“Mineralized Material6
Mineral reserve” means a mineralized body that has been defined by appropriate drilling and/or underground sampling to establish continuity and support an estimate of tonnage and an average grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the selected metals.qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted.
“Mining” means the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves or mineral deposits to produce a marketable metal or mineral product. Exploration continues during the mining process and, in many cases, mineral reserves or mineral deposits are expanded during the life of the mine activities as the exploration potential of the deposit is realized.
“Monzodiorite” means coarse-grained igneous rock consisting of essential plagioclase feldspar, orthoclase feldspar, hornblende and biotite, with or without pyroxene, with plagioclase being the dominant feldspar making up 6% to 90% of the total feldspar and varying from oligoclase to andesine in composition. The presence of the orthoclase feldspar distinguishes this rock from a diorite.
“National Instrument 43-101” or “NI 43-101” means the standards of disclosure for mineral projects prescribed by the Canadian Securities Administrators.
“Net Smelter Return Royalty” or “NSR Royalty” means a defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation, less a proportionate share of transportation, insurance, and processing costs.
“Open Pit” means a mine working or excavation open to the surface.
“Ore” means material containing minerals that can be economically extracted.
“Outcrop” means that part of a geologic formation or structure that appears at the surface of the earth.
“Oxide” means mineralized rock in which some of the original minerals have been oxidized (i.e., combined with oxygen).
6
“Precious Metal” means any of several relatively scarce and valuable metals, such as gold silver, and the platinum-group metals.silver.
“Preliminary Economic Assessment” or “PEA” means a study, other than a pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Study, that includes an economic analysis of the potential viability of mineral resources.
“Probable Mineral Reserves” means the economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some cases, a measured mineral reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for Proven Mineral Reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for Proven Mineral Reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.resource.
“Production Stage” means a project that is actively engaged in the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves or mineral deposits to produce a marketable metal or mineral product.
“Proven Mineral Reserves” means the economically mineable part of a measured mineral reserves for which (a) quantity is computedresource and can only result from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the resultsconversion of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth anda measured mineral content of reserves are well established.resource.
“Reclamation” means the process of returning land to another use after mining is completed.
“Recovery” means that portion of the metal contained in the ore that is successfully extracted by processing, expressed as a percentage.
“Mineral Reserves” means that part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of mineral reserve determination.
“Sampling” means selecting a fractional part of a mineral deposit for analysis.
7
“Sediment” means solid fragmental material that originates from weathering of rocks and is transported or deposited by air, water, or ice, or that accumulates by other natural agents, such as chemical precipitation from solution or secretion by organisms, and that forms in layers on the earth’s surface at ordinary temperatures in a loose, unconsolidated form.
“Sedimentary” means formed by the deposition of Sediment.
“Silver EquivalentS-K 1300” means silversubpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and gold only, with gold converted to silver equivalents at a specified ratio.Exchange Commission, which sets forth the rules and regulations for disclosure by registrants engaged in the mining industry.
“Skarn” means a coarse-grained metamorphic rock formed by the metamorphism of carbonate rock often containing garnet, pyroxene, epoditeepidote and wollastonnite.wollastonite.
“Stock” means discordant igneous intrusion having a surface exposure of less than 40 square miles.
“Sulfide” means a compound of sulfur and some other metallic element or elements.elements where sulfur is in the unoxidized form.
“Tailings Pond” means a low-lying depression used to confine tailings, the prime function of which is to allow enough time for processed minerals to settle out or for cyanide to be destroyed before water is reused, evaporates, or is discharged into the local watershed.
7
“Tertiary” means the first period of the Cenozoic Era (after the Cretaceous of the Mesozoic Era and before the Quaternary) thought to have covered the span of time between 2 to 3 million years ago and 65 million years ago.
“Vein” means a fissure, fault or crack in a rock filled by minerals that have traveled upwards from some deep source.
“Waste” means rock lacking sufficient grade and/or other characteristics of ore.
ITEMS 1 AND 2: BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
Overview
We are a mining company holding a 100% interest in the El Quevar advanced exploration silver propertyRodeo gold mine (the “Rodeo Property”) in the province of Salta, Argentina,Durango State, Mexico, a 100% interest in the Velardeña and Chicago precious metalsgold-silver mining properties and associated oxide and sulfide processing plants in the Statestate of Durango, Mexico (the “Velardeña Properties”), a 100% interest in the El Quevar advanced exploration silver property (the “El Quevar Property”) in the province of Salta, Argentina (subject to the terms of the April 9, 2020, earn-in agreement (the “Earn-in Agreement”) pursuant to which Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”) has the option to earn a 70% interest in the El Quevar Property), and a diversified portfolio of precious metals and other mineral exploration properties located primarily in or near historical precious metals producing regions of Argentina, Nevada and Mexico. The El Quevar advanced exploration property andRodeo Property, the Velardeña Properties and the El Quevar Property are ourthe only properties that the Company considers material properties.at this time.
8
We remainare primarily focused on evaluationmining operations at the Rodeo Property (see “Material Mining Properties – Rodeo Property” for additional details) as well as further studies of a restart plan for our Velardeña Properties, including use of bio-oxidation to improve the payable gold recovery as further described below under “Material Mining Properties —Velardeña Properties”. We began mining activities at the Rodeo Property during December 2020 and began processing mined material from Rodeo at the Velardeña plant in January 2021. The employees at the Rodeo and Velardeña Properties, in addition to those who operate the plant that processes the Rodeo mined material, include an operations group, an administrative group and an exploration group to continue to advance our plans in Mexico and to provide oversight for corporate compliance activities as well as maintaining and safeguarding the longer-term value of the Velardeña Properties assets.
We are also focused on advancing our El Quevar exploration property in Argentina through the Earn-in Agreement with Barrick as described below under “Exploration Properties—El Quevar” and on evaluatingcontinuing to evaluate and searchingsearch for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near term prospects of mining, includingand particularly for properties within reasonable haulage distances of our processing plants at the Velardeña processing plants. Properties. We are also focused and are continuing our exploration effortsreviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on selecteddevelopment or operating properties in our portfolio of approximately 12 exploration properties located primarily inNorth America, including Mexico.
Our management team is comprised of experienced mining professionals with extensive expertise in mineral exploration, mine construction and development, and mine operations. Our principal office is located in Golden, Colorado at 350 Indiana Street, Suite 800,650, Golden, CO 80401, and our registered office is the Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801. We also maintain an office at the Velardeña Properties in Mexico and exploration offices in Argentina and Mexico.
No Proven or Probable Mineral Reserves/Exploration Stage Company
We are considered an exploration stage company under the SEC criteria since we have not demonstrated the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves at any of our properties. In SEC Industry Guide 7, the SEC defines a “reserve” as that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Proven or probable mineral reserves are those reserves for which (a) quantity is computed and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are spaced so closely that the geologic character is defined and size, shape and depth of mineral content can be established (proven) or the sites are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced but high enough to assume continuity between observation points (probable). Mineral reserves cannot be considered proven or probable unless and until they are supported by a feasibility study, indicating that the mineral reserves have had the requisite geologic, technical and economic work performed and are economically and legally extractable.
Prior to suspending mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties in November 2015, we had revenues from the sale of silver, gold, lead and zinc products from the Velardeña and Chicago mines. We have not completed a feasibility study with regard to all or a portion of any of our properties to date. Any mineralized material discovered or extracted by us should not be considered proven or probable mineral reserves. As of December 31, 2018, none of our mineralized material met the definition of proven or probable mineral reserves. We expect to remain an exploration stage company for the foreseeable future. We will not exit the exploration stage until such time, if ever, that we demonstrate the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves that meet the guidelines under SEC Industry Guide 7.
8
Company History
We were incorporated in Delaware under the Delaware General Corporation Law in March 2009. From March 2009 through September 2011, we focused on the advancement of our El Quevar silver project in Argentina. OnIn September 2, 2011, we completed a business combination transaction with ECU Silver Mining Inc. (“ECU”), resulting in our ownership of the Velardeña and Chicago silver, gold and base metals mines located in the Velardeña mining district in the State of Durango, Mexico as further described below under “—Velardeña Properties”.
Corporate Structure
Golden Minerals Company, headquartered in Golden, Colorado, is the operating entity through which we conduct our business. We have a number of wholly-owned subsidiaries organized throughout the world, including in Mexico, Central America, South America, the Caribbean and Europe. We generally hold our exploration rights and properties through subsidiaries organized in the countries in which our rights and properties are located.
Summary of Mining Properties
Although we have commenced extraction of minerals at the Rodeo Property, we do not have defined mineral reserves as defined under S-K 1300 and therefore all of our mining properties are considered to be in the exploration stage. We have approximately 12 mining properties, which are listed in the Summary of Principal Mining Properties below.In total, Golden Minerals’ mining properties, including our options, cover about 78,600 hectares. The Rodeo Property, the Velardeña Properties and the El Quevar are the only properties that we consider to be material at this time.
9
Property locations
Mexico properties
Mexico Properties, Showing States of Chihuahua and Durango, Mexico
10
Argentina properties
11
United States property
Summary of Principal Mining Properties
12
| ||||
Property | Mine and mineral types | Ownership, Operator, and Permitting | Facilities and processing plants | Recent Activities |
Mexico | ||||
Rodeo(1) | Gold and silver Open pit mine(surface) | 100% owned or controlled, subject to royalty interest 2 concessions covering 1866 hectares Permitting complete and currently extracting minerals | Fuel storage, maintenance area, portable warehouses, mobile offices Mined material is transported to our Velardeña oxide mill for processing | Began mineral extraction in 2021, with payable extraction of 14,398 oz gold and 50,928 oz silver during the year |
Velardeña(2) | Silver and gold with lead and zinc byproducts. Potential underground mines | 100% ownership of 29 mineral concessions covering 316 hectares and surface ownership of 144 hectares that contain the oxide plant and tailings area. 31 hectares surface ownership containing the sulfide plant and tailings.35 hectares surface ownership containing mine portal, offices, and maintenance shops. Permitting complete | Underground workings related to prior mining (suspended in 2015). 300 tonne per day flotation mill for sulfide material 550 tonne per day cyanide leach mill for oxide material | Oxide mill is used to process material from our Rodeo mine. Currently evaluating mining methods and processing alternatives to enable potential restart of mineral extraction at Velardeña |
Santa Maria(3) | Gold and silver Potential underground mine | We hold options to purchase 100% of the 5 concessions that comprise the 101-hectare property with payments now complete | No significant facilities. | In 2020, we entered into an option agreement with Fabled Silver Gold Corp. under which Fabled will have the right to acquire a 100% interest in the property upon final payment of $2.0 million in cash on or before December 2022. |
13
Yoquivo(4) | Gold and silver exploration | We have an option to purchase 6 concessions (1907 hectares) | No significant facilities. | Completed a second phase, 3,949 meter, 21-hole drilling program in 2021 and reported results in the first quarter of 2022 |
Flechas | Gold and silver exploration | 100% ownership of 4 concessions (951 hectares) | No significant facilities | Prior historic production |
Miscellaneous | Preliminary mineral exploration | Ownership interest or right to acquire an ownership in seven individual concessions located in Durango, Zacatecas and Chihuahua | No significant facilities | No material exploration work has been conducted to date |
Argentina | ||||
El Quevar(5) | Silver exploration Potential surface and/or underground development | 100% ownership of 31 mining concessions (56,719 hectares) Permitting in place for exploration activities | Camp that accommodates 100 workers | Signed earn-in agreement with Barrick Gold, April 2020. Significant prior drilling |
Desierto(6) | Gold and silver exploration | 33% ownership and an option to increase to 67% ownership of 2 mining concessions (2505 hectares) Drill permit pending. | No significant facilities. | Pending JV agreement with Cascadero Copper for 51% ownership once option payments are complete |
14
Sarita Este(6) | Gold, silver and copper exploration | Company has option to acquire 51% from Cascadero Minerals Corp. One concession totaling 830 hectares. Drill permit received | No significant facilities. | In January 2022, announced results from initial ~2,500m drill program and plans for trenching and drilling in 2022 field campaign |
Carolina and Tocata | Preliminary mineral exploration | Company has ownership interest in 14 concessions in the San Juan and Santa Cruz provinces | No significant facilities | No material exploration work has been conducted to date |
Nevada, United States | ||||
Sand Canyon (7) | Gold and silver exploration | We have the option to earn a 60% interest from Golden Gryphon Enterprises: US$2.5M over 5 yrs plus $0.14M cash payments (now complete) Contains 586 claims totaling 4838 hectares Drill permit received | No significant facilities. | Announced results from initial drill program completed Q1 2020 Currently evaluating results and considering future activities |
(1) See “Material Mining Properties— Rodeo Property” for additional details, including a summary of mineral extraction.
(2) See “Material Mining Properties —Velardeña Properties” for additional details.
(3) See “Exploration Properties —Santa Maria” for additional details.
(4) See “Exploration Properties —Yoquivo” for additional details.
(5) See “Material Mining Properties —El Quevar” for additional details.
(6) See “Exploration Properties —Desierto / Sarita Este” for additional details.
(7) See “Exploration Properties —Sand Canyon” for additional details.
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Our Competitive Strengthsinternal controls relating to Quality Assurance and Business StrategyQuality Control (QA/QC) consist of monitoring the chain of custody of samples and including blanks, duplicates, and reference material standards in each batch of samples for lab analysis, consistent with industry standards. Additionally, umpire check assays are regularly submitted and analyzed to
15
ensure lab performance, as well as continuous oversight and review by senior staff to ensure all QA/QC procedures and protocols are followed under company standards and guidelines.
Our business strategyQA/QC data is rigorously reviewed and analyzed to establish Golden Mineralsensure its quality for use in exploration and mineral resource and estimation efforts. All mineral resource and estimation efforts are reviewed internally along with undergoing an external detailed peer review and edit process. Although there is inherent risk to any mineral resource estimation, we attempt to minimize risk by following strict QA/QC company procedures and protocols as well as continued and rigorous internal and external review.
No Proven or Probable Mineral Reserves/Exploration Stage Company
We are considered an exploration stage company under the SEC criteria because we have not demonstrated the existence of mineral reserves at any of our properties. Under S-K 1300, the SEC defines a mid-tier precious metals“mineral reserve” as “an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project.” To have mineral resources, there must be reasonable prospects for economic extraction. Per the SEC, “probable mineral reserves” are the economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some cases, a measured mineral resource and “proven mineral reserves” can only result from measured mineral resources. Mineral reserves cannot be considered proven or probable unless and until they are supported by a preliminary feasibility study or feasibility study, indicating that the mineral reserves have had the requisite geologic, technical and economic work performed and are economically and legally extractable.
Although we are currently extracting minerals from the Rodeo mine, due to the size of the Rodeo deposit and the relatively short anticipated mine life, we did not believe it necessary to incur the expense and delay involved in preparing a preliminary feasibility study or full feasibility study in order to commence extracting minerals at the Rodeo project. We have not completed a preliminary feasibility study or feasibility study with regard to any of our properties to date. We expect to remain an exploration stage company for the foreseeable future. We will not exit the exploration stage until such time, if ever, that we demonstrate the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves that meet the guidelines under S-K 1300, even if we successfully extract material from our properties, as we did in 2021 and expect to do in 2022.
16
Summary of Mineral Resources as of December 31, 2021
| Measured Mineral Resources | Indicated Mineral Resources | Measured + Indicated Mineral Resources | Inferred Mineral Resources | ||||||||
| Amount tonnes | Grade g/t | Quantity oz | Amount tonnes | Grade g/t | Quantity oz | Amount tonnes | Grade g/t | Quantity oz | Amount tonnes | Grade g/t | Quantity oz |
Gold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodeo mine1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-grade | 286,100 | 3.00 | 27,600 | 43,500 | 3.17 | 4,400 | 329,600 | 3.02 | 32,000 |
|
|
|
Low-grade (stockpile) | 201,100 | 1.24 | 8,000 | 55,500 | 1.18 | 2,100 | 256,500 | 1.23 | 10,100 | 1,500 | 1.21 | 100 |
Velardeña properties2 | 385,000 | 5.58 | 69,000 | 883,800 | 4.88 | 138,500 | 1,268,800 | 5.09 | 207,500 | 1,709,200 | 4.80 | 263,800 |
Total oz |
|
| 104,600 |
|
| 145,000 |
|
| 249,600 |
|
| 263,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodeo mine1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-grade | 286,100 | 13.4 | 123,000 | 43,500 | 10.7 | 14,900 | 329,600 | 13.0 | 138,000 |
|
|
|
Low-grade (stockpile) | 201,100 | 10.2 | 65,800 | 55,500 | 5.2 | 9,300 | 256,500 | 9.1 | 75,100 | 1,500 | 4.10 | 200 |
Velardeña properties2 | 385,000 | 327 | 4,050,800 | 883,800 | 316 | 8,980,600 | 1,268,800 | 319 | 13,031,400 | 1,709,200 | 362 | 19,893,600 |
Total oz |
|
| 4,239,600 |
|
| 9,004,800 |
|
| 13,244,500 |
|
| 19,893,800 |
* Rounded to nearest 100, columns might not total due to rounding
| 1. | based on $1,800 oz/Au and $25 oz/Ag at 1.6 g/t Au cutoff for high-grade, 1.0 g/t Au cutoff for low-grade |
| 2. | based on $1,744 oz/Au and $23.70 oz/Ag, $0.97/lb Pb, $1.15/lb Zn at $175/t NSR cutoff |
Description of Material Mining Properties
Rodeo Property
Location, Access and Facilities
The Rodeo project is located 2 km east of the town of Rodeo in Durango State, Mexico, at latitude 25°9'2.7"N, longitude 105°31'4.2"W The city of Torreón is located 189 kilometers by road to the east of the project and the city of Durango is located 157 kilometers by road to the south. The property can be reached via gravel roads from the town of Rodeo. Basic amenities are available in the town of Rodeo. Facilities onsite at the Rodeo project include fuel storage, a maintenance area, portable warehouses, mobile offices and other essential services and support units. No processing facilities are located on site. We have obtained rights to extract water from the Nazas River which is within a few kilometers of the project. There is a power line that crosses the property and services the nearby villages, however, we rely on generators to provide power for the minimal infrastructure required at the mine site.
17
Although we do not have defined mineral reserves and pursuant to S-K 1300 the Rodeo project is in the exploration stage, we began mining company focused in North America and Argentina. We also review strategic opportunities from time to time.
El Quevar Project. We continue to advance our El Quevarat the Rodeo project in Argentinalate December 2020.The Rodeo mine is a surface mine. We process mined material at our Velardeña oxide mill, which is located approximately 115 kilometers via road from the Rodeo project. The plant was initially constructed in 1996 and improved in September 20182005 and again in 2012. It is in good working condition and the current book value of the plant is $1.7 million.
We began processing mined material from the Rodeo project in January 2021 and reached a steady state of throughput in April 2021. Pursuant to the mine plan, we completed an updated preliminary economic assessment (the “El Quevar PEA”). The El Quevar PEA contemplatestruck mined material to the plant using a six-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at commercial trucking contractor. Our Velardeña mine production rate of 1,200oxide plant is a typical agitated leach plant that is rated to handle up to 550 tonnes per day usingof throughput. The plant is equipped with a post-pillar cut-and-fill mining method that will deliver approximately 2.45 million tonnes of diluted sulfide materialmodern doré refinery, and the attached tailings facility recently underwent an expansion which is expected to be sufficient for the tailings from operations at an average grade of 409 g/t silver. As contemplated inRodeo. We installed a new regrind mill circuit at the PEA,plant specifically designed to process the harder mined material would be processed using a conventional single product flotation mill that would produce a silver-rich bulk concentrate suitable for sale. We remain opencoming from the Rodeo Property, which was completed in April 2021. The new circuit allowed us to finding a partner to contribute to the fundingincrease daily throughput of further exploration and development of the project.
Velardeña Properties. Due to continuing net operating losses, we suspended mining and sulfide processing activities at the Velardeña Properties during the first half of November 2015Rodeo material in order to conserve the future value of the asset. We have placed the mine and sulfide processing plant on care and maintenance to enable a re-start of either the mine or the mill when we are able to develop mining and processing plans that at then current prices for silver and gold indicate a sustainable positive operating margin (defined as revenues less costs of sales) or we are able to locate, acquire and develop alternative mineral sources that could be economically mined and transported to the Velardeña Properties for processing. The Velardeña Properties include a 300 tonne per day flotation sulfide mill, which includes three flotation circuits in which we can process sulfide material to make lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. The properties also include a conventional 550 tonne per day cyanide leach oxide mill with a Merrill-Crowe precipitation circuit and flotation circuit located adjacent to our Chicago mine. In July 2015, we leased the oxide plant to Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V. (“Hecla”), a Mexican corporationat least 500 tonnes per day. Mill throughput averaged 532 tonnes per day in third quarter 2021 and wholly-owned subsidiary466 tonnes per day in fourth quarter 2021. At that higher throughput level, the current life of Hecla Mining Company,the Rodeo mine is estimated to process its own materialrun through the plant. The lease with Hecla has since been extended through December 31, 2020. We continue to evaluate and search for other oxide and sulfide feed sources, focusing on sources within haulage distancesecond quarter of our sulfide and oxide mills2023, unless additional resources are discovered.
Assays from processing at the Velardeña Properties.
Exploration Focus. Weoxide plant indicate the doré bars smelted to date are focused on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America with high precious metal grades and low development costs with near term prospects of mining, and particularly properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña processing plants. We are also continuing our exploration efforts on selected properties in our portfoliocomprised of approximately 12 exploration properties20 to 30 percent gold and 65 to 80 percent silver and are of a quality that is readily marketable and saleable to refineries located primarilyeither in Mexico. During the last two years, weMexico or internationally, consistent with standard commercial terms. We entered into a refining agreement with a third party in February 2021 and have continued to focus on the Santa Maria mine westcompleted 37shipments of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua, and in October 2018 we completed a second preliminary economic assessment (the “Santa Maria PEA”) on the project. Our Rodeodoré as of March 18, 2022.
918
property west of the Velardeña Properties also remains an interesting asset and we have received confirmation of good gold and silver metallurgical recoveries for milled material in initial test work. Additionally, new discoveries of high-grade silver-gold assays at the claims in the Yoquivo District of Chihauhua, Mexico have led us to consider a drill program in 2019. During 2019 we plan to focus our exploration efforts primarily at our El Quevar silver project and on exploration and evaluation activities at Yoquivo, Navegantes and several new properties in Mexico recently acquired through staking. We expect our expenditures for the exploration program in 2019 to be approximately $ 3.3 million, subject to the availability of sufficient funds.
Experienced Management Team. We are led by a team of mining professionals with approximately 60 years of combined experience in exploration, project development, and operations management, primarily in the Americas. Our executive officers have held senior positions at various large mining companies including, among others, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, INCO Limited, Meridian Gold Company, Barrick Gold Exploration and Noranda Exploration.
El Quevar
Location and Access
Our El Quevar silver project is located in the San Antonio de los Cobres municipality, Salta Province, in the altiplano region of northwestern Argentina, approximately 300 kilometers by road northwest of the city of Salta, the capital city of the province. The project is also accessible by a 300 kilometer dirt and gravel road from the city of Calama in northern Chile. The small village of Pocitos, located about 20 kilometers to the west of El Quevar, is the nearest settlement. We have established a camp approximately 10 kilometers west of the project to house project workers. A high tension power line is located approximately 40 kilometers from the site, and a high pressure gas line devoted to the mining industry and subsidized by the Salta government is located within four kilometers of the El Quevar camp.
The El Quevar project is located near Nevado Peak with altitudes at the concessions ranging from 3,800 to 6,130 meters above sea level. The climate of the area is high mountain desert, with some precipitation in summer (such as snow) and little snow in winter.
10
The following map shows the location of the El QuevarRodeo project.
Property History
Mining activity inExploration and aroundinformal mining of the El Quevar projectRodeo Property dates back at least 80over 25 years. Between 1930Prior to 1994, two prospects, called the “Los Murcielagos” gold-silver-lead-copper and 1950, there was lead and silver extraction of mineralized materials from small workings“Francisco Marquez” gold-copper prospects, were documented in the area, but we have no mining recordsvicinity of the Los Murcielagos arroyo on the Rodeo Property. Little information is available on these historic prospects other than gold- and silver-bearing mineralization was apparently extracted from short adits that period. The first organizedare visible from surface. In the early 1990’s, exploration activitieswork, including geological mapping and drilling, on the property occurredwas carried out by La Cuesta International Inc. and Monarch Resources de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. The property was acquired by Canplats Resource Corporation in 2003, and it conducted a geochemical sampling program and multiple drilling programs during the 1970s, although no datamid-2000s. Canplats was acquired by Goldcorp Inc. in 2010 and the rights to the Rodeo concessions came to be held in Camino Minerals Corporation (“Camino”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Goldcorp. In 2010, Camino issued a technical report on the property. In 2011, Camino conducted a 6,238-meter drilling program to investigate the extension of the known mineralization to the north and south of the main mineralized zone of the property, as well as its depth. In 2014, Camino relinquished its right to acquire the Rodeo concessions and the property reverted to La Cuesta. We acquired the Rodeo concessions from that period remains. Over the last 30 years, several companies have carried out exploration activityLa Cuesta International Inc. in the area, including BHP Billiton, Industrias Peñoles, Mansfield Minerals and Hochschild Mining Group, consisting primarily of local sampling with some limited drilling programs.2015.
Title and Ownership Rights
According to Argentine law, mineral resources are subject to regulation in the provinces where the resources are located. Each province has the authority to grant mining exploration permits and mining exploitation concession rights to applicants. The Federal Congress has enacted the National Mining Code and other substantive mining legislation, which is applicable throughout Argentina; however, each province has the authority to regulate the procedural aspects of the National Mining Code and to organize the enforcement authority within its own territory.
11
In the province of Salta, where the El Quevar project is located, all mining concessions are granted by a judge in the Salta Mining Court. The El Quevar project is comprised of exploitation concessions. Exploitation concessions are subject to a canon payment fee (maintenance fee) which is paid in advance twice a year (before June 30th and December 31st of each calendar year). Each time a new mining concession is granted, concession holders are exempt from the canon payment fee for a period of three years from the concession grant date. However, this exemption does not apply to the grant of vacant exploitation concessions; only to the grant of new mining concessions.
The El QuevarRodeo project is currently comprisedconsists of 31 miningtwo mineral concessions that we hold directly. In total, the El Quevar project encompassestotaling approximately 57,0001,866 hectares. The area“Rodeo” concession, totaling 521 hectares, is held under a lease agreement dated May 18, 2015 pursuant to which we are required to make advanced royalty payments of most$40,000 per year to La Cuesta International, S.A. de C.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of our exploration activities at El Quevar is within the concessions that are owned by Silex Argentina S.A., our wholly-owned subsidiary.
La Cuesta International Inc (“La Cuesta”). We are required to pay La Cuesta a 2% net smelter return royalty.
19
After $5 million has been paid to La Cuesta under the royalty agreement, the royalty payment will reduce to a 1% net smelter return royaltyreturn. The mineral resources that have been identified to date are located on the valueRodeo concession.
The “Rodeo 2” concession, totaling approximately 1,345 hectares, was purchased from Rojo Resources, S.A. de C.V. under a purchase agreement dated July 22, 2015. Royalty payments of all minerals extracted2% of net smelter returns on material produced from the El Quevar II concession andRodeo 2 are also due to La Cuesta.
We are also required to pay a 1%0.5% net smelter return royalty on one-half of the minerals extracted from the Castor concession to the third partyMexican federal government from whom we acquired these concessions. We can purchase one half ofall gold and silver extraction at the royalty for $1 million in the first two years of production. The Yaxtché deposit is located primarily on the Castor concession. We may also be required to pay a 3% royalty to the Salta Province based on the net smelter value of minerals extracted from any of our concessions less costs of processing. To maintain all of the El Quevar concessions, we paid canon payment fees to the Argentine government of approximately $111,000 and $57,000 in 2017 and 2018, respectively. In 2019 we expect to pay approximately $60,000. Rodeo Property.
The following El QuevarRodeo Property mine concessions are identified below by name and file number in the Salta ProvinceFederal government Public Registry of Mines.Mining.
Name of Mine Concession | Concession File Number | ||
Rodeo |
|
12
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
|
We are required to pay annual concession holding fees to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to the Rodeo mining concessions. In 2021, we made such payments totaling approximately $33,000 and expect to pay approximately $35,000 in 2022. Similar to our Velardeña Properties, the Rodeo Property is subject to the Mexican ejido system requiring us to contract with the local communities, or ejidos, surrounding the property to access mineral claims needed in connection with our mining and exploration activities. The Rodeo deposit is located on a private ranch and is not a part of the ejido system. We have a surface use agreement with the private ranch owner that allows us to operate on the property and does not expire until March 12, 2030. The surface rights at El Quevar are controlled byuse agreement requires us to make annual payments of approximately $240,000 to the Salta Province. There are no private properties withinranch owner. We also have an agreement with the concession area. To date, no issues involving surface rights have impacted the project. Although we have unrestrictedlocal ejidos to allow access to the property that we believe will be sufficient to conduct our facilities, weproposed mining activities for the life of the mine. The local ejidos do not have been granted easementsa direct interest in the mineral claims and payments under the agreement are expected to further protect our access rights.be less than $25,000 per year.
Geology and Mineralization
The geologyRodeo concession lies on the eastern boundary of the El Quevar project is characterizedSierra Madre Occidental. The Rodeo fault system consists of three major parallel structures and wall-rock fracture systems that are the principal feeder conduits for a high-level, gold-silver epithermal mineral system. These major vein and breccia-filled structures appear to be feeder conduits responsible for the 1 kilometer by silver-rich veins4 kilometer area of silicified, clay-altered and disseminations in Tertiary volcanicgold-anomalous rocks that form a resistant north northwest-trending ridge. All three of the structures are partwide, laterally and longitudinally persistent, well-developed feeder vein swarms with high-level, locally banded chalcedonic quartz veins, stockworks and silicified breccias. In the area of an eroded stratovolcano. Silver mineralizationprincipal interest, the structures are strongly veined, silicified, brecciated, and mineralized for over 4 kilometers, and the shear fault zones and hydrothermal system can be traced for 8 kilometers along strike on the property. Individual feeder vein and breccia systems are up to 60 meters thick. Flexures in the vein swarms and/or structural intersections provide brecciation and open conduits for intense, episodic fluid flow and silica deposition with the potential for ore-grade concentrations of precious metals, especially gold.
The immediate Rodeo deposit area is approximately 300 meters along strike and 200 meters wide and extends to a depth of 200 meters below surface. The deposit strikes at El Quevar330° and dips to the northeast with various vein phases dipping from subvertical to 30°. The deposit is entirely hosted within a broad, generally east-west-trending structural zoneTertiary Rodeo volcanics that are strongly silicified and occurs as a series of north-dipping parallel sheeted vein zones, brecciasbrecciated. The deposit is bound to the east by the Rodeo fault. Along strike to the north and mineralized faults situated within an envelope of pervasively silicified brecciated volcanic rocks. There are at least three sub-parallel structures that extend for an aggregate length of approximately 6.5 kilometers. Several volcanic domes (small intrusive bodies) have been identified andsouth, the mineralization is also found in breccias associated withoffset slightly by near vertical faulting; mineralization does not terminate at these domes, especially wherefaults but the intensity of the trend is either diminished or has yet to be located.
1320
Mineral Resource Estimate
Mineral resources were calculated by Tetra Tech through the effective date of Contents
they are intersected byOctober 31, 2021 as shown in the structures. The silver mineralizationTechnical Report Summary attached to this annual report on Form 10-K. After adjusting for mineral extraction at Rodeo for November and December 2021, the estimate of mineral resources at the Yaxtché zoneRodeo Property at December 31, 2021 is of epithermal origin. The cross-cutting natureshown below. Aaron Amoroso, an employee of the mineralization,Company and “qualified person” pursuant to S-K 1300, prepared the assemblageestimate shown below. The resources are reported at a cutoff of sulfide1 g/t for stockpiling and alteration minerals,1.6 g/t for processing. Numbers reported as mineral resource are constrained to a mine design of 1 g/t.
Table Error! No text of specified style in document.: Rodeo Property – Summary of Gold and Silver Mineral Resources at December 31, 2021 Based on $1,800 oz/Au and $25 oz/Ag
| ||||||
Classification | Cutoff Au (g/t) | Tonnes | Au (g/t) | Au (oz) | Ag (g/t) | Ag (oz) |
Low-Grade (Stockpile) | ||||||
Measured | 1.0 | 201,100 | 1.24 | 8,000 | 10.18 | 65,800 |
Indicated | 1.0 | 55,500 | 1.18 | 2,100 | 5.21 | 9,300 |
Measured + Indicated | 1.0 | 256,500 | 1.23 | 10,100 | 9.11 | 75,100 |
Inferred | 1.0 | 1,500 | 1.21 | 100 | 4.10 | 200 |
High-Grade | ||||||
Measured | 1.6 | 286,100 | 3.00 | 27,600 | 13.37 | 123,000 |
Indicated | 1.6 | 43,500 | 3.17 | 4,400 | 10.66 | 14,900 |
Measured + Indicated | 1.6 | 329,600 | 3.02 | 32,000 | 13.02 | 137,900 |
*Columns may not total due to rounding
The resource tabulation shown above is based on our internal price forecasts at that time which were accepted as reasonable by TetraTech. In preparing the presenceestimate as of open spaces with euhedral minerals, all point to an originDecember 31, 2021, Mr. Amoroso determined that those price assumptions remained reasonable at shallow to moderate depths (a few hundred meters below surface) from hydrothermal solutions.
|
During 2012, we released an estimate of mineralized material at our El Quevar project. This estimate assumed mining of oxide material from an open pit on the east end of the Yaxtché depositfiscal year. The reported resource for the Rodeo mine as of December 31, 2021 was calculated by adjusting for material mined and sulfide material from bothprocessed between November 1st and December 31st.
Production
For a discussion of mineral extraction at Rodeo during 2021 and plans for 2022, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – 2021 Highlights – Rodeo Property.”
Certain Laws Affecting Mining in Mexico
Our current and proposed operations at the open pitRodeo Project are subject to a variety of laws affecting mining operations in Mexico. For a discussion of these laws, see “Material Mining and an underground mine on the western portionProperties – Velardeña Properties -Certain Laws Affecting Mining in Mexico”.
Taxes
For a discussion of the Yaxtché deposit. The estimate was based on results from 270 core drill holes.
In 2017, Amec Foster Wheeler E&C Services, Inc., a Wood Group PLC company (“Wood”) undertook an analysis and re-modeling of the data utilizedtaxes that apply generally to mining projects in the prior mineralized material estimate using updated geologic controls and a modeling method that optimizes grade. This resulted in an updated mineralized material estimate completed in February 2018. The Wood estimate assumes mining would occur solely underground and would be optimized to maximize potential silver grades. According to the Wood estimate, sulfide mineralized material in the Yaxtché zone, at a cut-off grade of 250 grams per tonne silver, and using a three-year average silver price of $16.62 per ounce, was 2.6 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 487 grams per tonne.
For further detail regarding mineralized material,Mexico, see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIALMaterial Mining Properties – Velardeña Properties –Taxes in Mexico”.
Exploration and Advancement of El Quevar
The Yaxtché deposit is the primary target currently identified at the El Quevar project. In September 2018, we completed the El Quevar PEA, which confirmed the potential for a profitable mining operation at Yaxtché with an estimated 5 million ounces annual silver production. The El Quevar PEA contemplates a six-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at a mine production rate of 1,200 tonnes per day using a post-pillar cut-and-fill mining method, delivering 2.45 million tonnes of diluted sulfide mineralized material at an average grade of 409 g/t silver. We have completed environmental baseline studies, and a further environmental impact assessment process would be required to support the permits necessary for construction and mining. If the El Quevar project proceeds to development and construction, we would be required to obtain numerous additional permits from national, provincial and municipal authorities in Argentina.
We spent approximately $1.3 million and $0.8 million at our El Quevar project on holding and maintenance costs in 2018 and 2017, respectively. The additional spending in 2018 was primarily related to the costs of preparing the technical reports and preparing for exploration drilling. From the inception of our exploration activities in 2004 through December 31, 2018 we have spent approximately $77.9 million on exploration and related activities at El Quevar, including amounts spent by our predecessor, Apex Silver Mines Limited. In 2019 we expect to spend approximately $1.3 million at our El Quevar project to fund ongoing exploration and evaluation activities, care and maintenance and property holding costs.
We have evaluated plans for further exploration drilling to increase the size of high grade silver resources near the Yaxtché deposit. The Yaxtché deposit is open to the west and there are numerous drill intercepts with silver grades of economic interest in the nearby area that represent targets for further expansion. During 2019, subject to the availability of sufficient funds, we plan to drill about fifteen core holes for a total of 3,000 meters to test extensions of mineralized material at Yaxtché, offsets to existing promising drill intercepts, and new drill targets based on reinterpreted IP (induced polarization) geophysics.
1421
Recent Activities and Operating Plans
For a discussion of Contents
recent activities and projected operating parameters, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – 2021 Highlights – Rodeo Property” below.
Velardeña Properties
Location, Access and Facilities
The Velardeña Properties are comprised of two underground mines and two processing plants, which are located within the Velardeña mining district which is located in the municipality of Cuencamé, in the northeast quadrant of the State of Durango, Mexico, approximately 65 kilometers southwest of the city of Torreón, Coahuila and approximately 140 kilometers northeast of the city of Durango, which is the capital of the State of Durango. Durango.. The Velardeña property is centered on UTM grid coordinates 2774300 N and 632200 E (WGS 84 datum, zone 13). This property contains the Santa Juana mine which has been the focus of mining efforts since 1995, as well as the historical Terneras, San Juanes, and San Mateo mines.
The Chicago property is located approximately 2 km south of the Velardeña property and is centered at UTM grid coordinates 2772480 N and 631867 E (WGS 84 datum, zone 13). This property contains the historical Los Muertos-Chicago mine.
The mines are reached by a seven kilometerseven-kilometer gravel road from the village of Velardeña which is reached by highway from Torreón and Durango. The Velardeña mining district is situated in a temperate hot, semi-arid region.
Although we do not have defined mineral reserves pursuant to S-K 1300 and the Velardeña Properties are in the exploration stage, we have extracted minerals from the Velardeña Properties in the past. Of the two underground mines comprising the Velardeña Properties, the Velardeña mine includes five different major vein systems including the Terneras, Roca Negra, San Mateo, Santa Juana and San Juanes systems. During 2015, we mined from the San Mateo, Terneras and Roca Negra vein systems as well as the Santa Juana vein system to augment grades as mining and processing rates ramped up.
We own a 300 tonne300-tonne per day flotation sulfide mill situated near the town of Velardeña. The mill includes three flotation circuits in which we can process sulfide material to make lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. We also own a conventional 550 tonne550-tonne per day cyanide leach oxide mill with a Merrill-Crowe precipitation circuit and flotation circuit located adjacent to our Chicago mine. In July 2015, we leased the oxide plant to Minera Hecla S.A. de C.V. (“Hecla”), a Mexican corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company, to process its own material through the plant. See “-Velardeña Properties Activities” below.plant (the “Hecla Lease”). The leaseHecla Lease was subsequently extended and ultimately terminated in accordance with Hecla has since been extended through December 31,its terms on November 30, 2020. We continue to evaluate and search for other oxide and sulfide feed sources, focusing on sources within haulage distance of our sulfide and oxide mills at the Velardeña Properties.
Prior to shutting down productionWe installed a new regrind mill circuit at the Velardeña mines in 2015, we truckedoxide plant specifically designed to process the harder mined material coming from the Velardeña minesRodeo Property, which was completed in April 2021. The new circuit allowed us to the sulfide plant. In January 2012 we completed a tailings pond expansion at the sulfide plant, which is fully permitted and has capacity to treat tailings for approximately four additional years at the average processing rateincrease daily throughput of 285 tonnes per day. AtRodeo material in the oxide plant Hecla is required to either leave unused at least 500 tonnes per day.
The recent rise in precious metals prices, the endadvancement of alternative processing technologies in the industry, and the results of our testing activities prompted us to pursue the preparation of an updated PEA based partly on projected increased gold recoveries from a proposed bio-oxidation circuit to treat gold-bearing pyrite concentrates. In April 2020, we announced positive results from the updated PEA, which was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101.
In June 2021 we began limited scale mining activities at our Velardeña underground mine to obtain further bulk samples for use in final optimization of the lease term an agreed amount of capacitybio-oxidation plant design and for use in additional flotation separation studies
22
that will indicate how we can best separate the gold-bearing minerals into the pyrite-arsenopyrite concentrate that is proposed for processing in the tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost.bio-oxidation circuit.
We are also testing mining methods to ensure that we can effectively control mining dilution to obtain the head grades that we expect based on our PEA study. We expect to have the results of these studies in early 2022. We have not yet made a decision regarding a potential restart of the Velardeña mines.
Power for all of the mines and plants is provided through substations connected to the national grid.
Water is provided for all of the mines by wells located in the valley adjacent to the Velardeña Properties. In Mexico, water concessions are granted by the National Commission of Water (“CNA”). Currently no new water concessions are being granted by the CNA; however, companies can acquire water concessions through purchase or lease from current concession holders. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are currently pumpingrequired to make annual payments to the CNA to maintain our rights to these wells. In 2021 we made such payments totaling approximately $75,000 and expect to pay approximately $84,000 in 2022 We are required to pay a nominal additional fee to the CNA each year if we use too much water from the three wells associated with the oxide plant which is more than sufficient for Hecla’s processing operations.a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well.
15
The following map shows the location of the Velardeña Properties (other than the El Mogote Fraccion concession, which is located south of the identified properties).Properties.
Property History
Exploration and mining in the Velardeña district extendsextended back to at least the late 1500s or early 1600s, with large scale mining beginning in 1888 with the Velardeña Mining and Smelter Company. In 1902, the mining properties were acquired by ASARCO, who mined the property until 1926 when the mines were closed. For the next 35 years, the mines were operated from time to time by small companies and local miners. The property was nationalized in 1961, and in 1968 the sulfide processing plant was built by the Mexican government. In 1994, William Resources acquired the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties. In 1997, ECU Gold (the predecessor to ECU Silver Mining Inc.) purchased from William Resources the subsidiaries that owned the concessions and the oxidesulfide processing plant. The sulfideoxide processing plant was acquired in 2004. In 2011, we acquired ECU Silver Mining Inc.
Title and Ownership Rights
We hold the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties through our wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary Minera William S.A. de C.V. At present, a total of 3028 mineral concessions comprise the Velardeña Properties. The Velardeña Properties concessions encompass approximately 895316 hectares. The mineral concessions vary in size, and the concessions comprising each mineral property are contiguous within each of the Velardeña and Chicago properties. We are required to
16
pay annual concession holding fees to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to the Velardeña mining concessions. In 2018,2020, we made such payments totaling approximately $78,000$22,000 and expect to pay approximately $80,000$23,000 in 2019.2022. We also own the surface rights to 144 hectares that contains the oxide plant, tailings area and access to the Chicago mine, along with surface lands that may be required for potential plant expansions.
The Velardeña Properties are in part subject to the Mexican ejido system requiring us to contract with the local communities, or ejidos, surrounding our properties to obtain surface access rights needed in connection with our mining and exploration activities. We currently have contracts with two ejidos to secure surface rights for our Velardeña Properties with a total annual cost of approximately $35,000.$56,000. We have a ten-year contract with the Velardeña ejido, which provides surface rights to certain roads and other infrastructure at the Velardeña Properties through 2021 which is being renewed under mutual agreement, and a 25-year contract with the Vista Hermosa ejido, which provides exploration access and access rights for roads and utilities for our Velardeña Properties until 2038.
The following Velardeña Properties exploitation concessions are identified below by name and number in the Federal government Public Registry of Mining.
24
Mine/Area | |
17
| Name of Exploitation | | Concession | ||
Velardeña | | AMPL. DEL ÁGUILA MEXICANA | | 85580 | |
| | ÁGUILA MEXICANA | | 168290 | |
| | LA CUBANA | | 168291 | |
| | TORNASOL | | 168292 | |
| | SAN MATEO NUEVO | | 171981 | |
| | SAN MATEO | | 171982 | |
| | RECUERDO | | 171983 | |
| | SAN LUIS | | 171984 | |
| | LA NUEVA ESPERANZA | | 171985 | |
| | LA PEQUEÑA | | 171988 | |
| | BUEN RETIRO | | 172014 | |
| | UNIFICACIÓN SAN JUAN EVANGELISTA | | 172737 | |
| | UNIFICACIÓN VIBORILLAS | | 185900 | |
| | BUENAVENTURA No. 3 | | 188507 | |
| | EL PÁJARO AZÚL | | 188508 | |
| | BUENAVENTURA 2 | | 191305 | |
| | BUENAVENTURA | | 192126 | |
| | LOS DOS AMIGOS | | 193481 | |
| | VIBORILLAS NO. 2 | | 211544 | |
| | KELLY | | 218681 | |
| | | | | |
Chicago | | SANTA TERESA | | 171326 | |
| | SAN JUAN | | 171332 | |
| | LOS MUERTOS | | 171986 | |
| | EL GAMBUSINO | | 171987 | |
| | AMPLIACIÓN SAN JUAN | | 183883 | |
| | MUÑEQUITA | | 196313 | |
| | SAN AGUSTÍN | | 210764 | |
|
|
| |||
| LA CRUZ | | 189474 | ||
|
| |
We hold water concessions in wells that provide water for the Velardeña Properties. In Mexico water concessions are granted by the National Commission of Water (“CNA”). Currently no new water concessions are being granted by the CNA; however, companies can acquire water concessions through purchase or lease from current concession holders. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are required to make annual payments to the CNA to maintain our rights to these wells. In 2018 we made such payments totaling approximately $25,000 and expect to pay approximately the same amount in 2019. We are required to pay a fine to the CNA each year if we use too much water from a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well. During 2018 we did not incur any over usage or under usage fines.
18
Geology and Mineralization
The Velardeña district is located at the easternmost limit of the Sierra Madre Occidental on the boundary between the Sierra Madre Oriental and the Mesa Central sub-provinces. Both of these terrains are underlain by Paleozoic and possiblyprobably Precambrian basement rocks.
The regional geology is characterized by a thick sequence of limestone and minor calcareous clastic sediments of Cretaceous age, intruded by Tertiary plutons of acidic to intermediate composition. During the Laramide Orogeny, the sediments were folded into symmetrical anticlines and synclines that were modified into a series of asymmetrical overturned folds by a later stage of compression.
A series of younger Tertiary stocks have intruded the older Cretaceous limestone over a distance of approximately 15 kilometers along a northeast to southwest trend. The various mineral deposits of the Velardeña mining district occur along the northeast southwest axis and are spatially associated with the intrusions and their related alteration.
25
An important northwest-southeast fracture system is associated with these intrusions and, in many cases, acts as the main focus of mineralization. The Velardeña Properties are underlain by a thick sequence of limestone that corresponds to rocks of the Aurora and Cuesta del Cura formations of Lower Cretaceous age.
Several types of Tertiary intrusive rocks are present in the Velardeña district. The largest of these rocksintrusives outcrops on the western flank of the Sierra San Lorenzo and underlies a portion of the Velardeña Properties. It is referred to as the Terneras pluton and forms a northeast oriented, slightly elongated body, considered to represent a diorite or monzodiorite that outcrops over a distance of about 2.5 kilometers. The adjacent limestone has been altered by contact metamorphism (exoskarn), and locally the intrusive has been metamorphosed (endoskarn).
The following is a description of the individual geological characteristics and mineralization found on each of the properties comprising the Velardeña and Chicago mines.
Velardeña Mine
The Santa Juana, Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo vein deposits on the Velardeña property are hosted by Aurora Formation limestone, the Terneras intrusion and related skarn. The limestone is intruded by a series of multiphase diorite or monzodiorite stocks (Terneras intrusion) and dikes of Tertiary age that outcrop over a strike length of approximately 2.5 kilometers.
Two main vein systems are present on the Velardeña property. The first is a northwest striking system as found in the Santa Juana deposit, while the second is east-west trending and is present in the Santa Juana, Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo deposits.
In the Santa Juana deposit, vein trends are steeply northeast dipping and northwest trending. The Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo veins all strike east-west and dip steeply north. The most extensive of these is the Terneras vein, which was mined in the past over a strike length of 1,100 meters. All of these veins are observed to have extensive strike lengths and vertical continuity for hundreds of meters. The mineralogy of the east west system is somewhat different in that it contains less arsenic than the northwest Santa Juana veins.
Mineralization in the deposits located at the Velardeña mine belongsoccurs primarily toin epithermal calcite quartzquartz-calcite veins with associated lead, zinc, silver, gold and copper mineralization,minerals including gold hosted mostly in arsenopyrite and pyrite, typical of the polymetallic vein deposits of northern Mexico. The veins are usually thin, normally in the 0.2 meter to 0.5 meter range, but consistent along strike and down dip. Coxcomb and rhythmically banded textures are common.
1926
Chicago Mine
On the Chicago property, the oldest rocks outcropping are Cretaceous limestone of the Aurora Formation which are highly folded. This limestone is locally metamorphosed by the intrusion of the Tertiary dioritic stocks and dykes. The general geologygeologic setting of the Chicago property is very similar to that at the geologyVelardeña mine. The oldest rocks outcropping at Chicago are folded limestone of the Aurora Formation which were intruded by Tertiary diorite stocks and dikes. Intrusive rocks occupy the western portion of the property with a northeast orientation. The limestone-diorite contact exhibits widespread recrystallization and marble formation overprinted by a distinctive green calc-silicate alteration dominated by grossular garnet and lesser wollastonite.
As at Velardeña, a system of post-mineralization faults striking northwest-southeast cuts and locally displaces mineralized structures. These faults are normally filled with calcite and can have widths up to 10 m near the surface.
In the Chicago mine, rhyolitic volcanic rocks and calcareous conglomerate of the Ahuichila Formation unconformably overlie the mineralized sequence across the eastern half of the area. Mineralization is similar to that encountered at Santa Juana mine in terms of mineralogy, host rocks, geometry of the structures and vein continuity.
Mineralization at the Chicago Mine is similar to the Velardeña Mine in terms of mineralogy, host rocks, geometry of the structures, and continuity. The difference between the two is geometric - northwest striking veins dipping to the northeast at Velardeña instead of northeast striking veins dipping to the southeast at Chicago. The major veins at Chicago are the Chicago vein, the Escondida vein, and the Gambusino vein.
Mineral Resource Estimate
Estimated mineral resources for the Velardeña project are shown in Table 2. The resource is reported by mineral type and resource class for all veins. Resources were calculated as diluted to a minimum of 0.7 meters and are reported at a $175 NSR cutoff..
27
Table 2: Velardeña Project – Summary of Silver and Gold Mineral Resources at December 31, 2021
based on $23.70/troy ounce Ag, $1,744/troy ounce Au, $0.97/lb Pb, and $1.15/lb Zn (1)(2)(3)
Classification | Mineral Type | NSR Cutoff | Tonnes | Grade Ag g/t | Grade Au g/t | Grade Pb% | Grade Zn% | Ag oz | Au oz | Pb lb | Zn lb |
Measured | Oxide | 175 | 128,800 | 268 | 5.69 | 1.74 | 1.53 | 1,108,000 | 23,500 | 4,936,000 | 4,333,400 |
Indicated | Oxide | 175 | 280,300 | 262 | 5.06 | 1.73 | 1.45 | 2,361,200 | 45,600 | 10,681,500 | 8,936,600 |
Measured + Indicated | Oxide | 175 | 409,100 | 264 | 5.26 | 1.73 | 1.47 | 3,469,200 | 69,100 | 15,617,500 | 13,270,000 |
Inferred | Oxide | 175 | 351,400 | 417 | 4.95 | 2.55 | 1.45 | 4,714,600 | 56,000 | 19,729,500 | 11,248,200 |
| |||||||||||
Measured | Sulfide | 175 | 256,200 | 357 | 5.52 | 1.56 | 1.91 | 2,942,800 | 45,500 | 8,819,300 | 10,769,700 |
Indicated | Sulfide | 175 | 603,500 | 341 | 4.79 | 1.46 | 1.91 | 6,619,400 | 92,900 | 19,475,600 | 25,408,900 |
Measured + Indicated | Sulfide | 175 | 859,700 | 346 | 5.01 | 1.49 | 1.91 | 9,562,200 | 138,400 | 28,294,900 | 36,178,600 |
Inferred | Sulfide | 175 | 1,357,700 | 348 | 4.76 | 1.52 | 1.97 | 15,179,000 | 207,800 | 45,534,200 | 58,952,900 |
| |||||||||||
Measured | All | 175 | 385,000 | 327 | 5.58 | 1.62 | 1.78 | 4,050,800 | 69,000 | 13,755,300 | 15,103,100 |
Indicated | All | 175 | 883,800 | 316 | 4.88 | 1.55 | 1.76 | 8,980,600 | 138,500 | 30,157,100 | 34,345,500 |
Measured + Indicated | All | 175 | 1,268,800 | 319 | 5.09 | 1.57 | 1.77 | 13,031,400 | 207,500 | 43,912,400 | 49,448,600 |
Inferred | All | 175 | 1,709,200 | 362 | 4.80 | 1.73 | 1.86 | 19,893,600 | 263,800 | 65,263,700 | 70,201,100 |
Notes:
| (1) | Tetra Tech was the qualified person for the preparation of the mineral resource estimate for the Velardeña Properties. |
| (2) | Resources are reported as diluted tonnes and grade to 0.7 m fixed width |
| (3) | Columns may not total due to rounding |
Mineral resources have been tabulated using a US$175/t NSR cutoff grade based on the price assumptions shown in Table 3. The resource tabulation is presented based on the long-term average consensus prices from 40 banks as of December 31, 2021. The prices used are US$23.70/troy ounce Ag, US$1,744/troy ounce Au, US$0.97/lb Pb, and US$1.15/lb Zn.
28
Table 3: Cutoff price assumptions
Assumption | Value |
Ag Price $/oz | 23.70 |
Au Price $/oz | 1,744 |
Pb Price $/lb | 0.97 |
Zn Price $/lb | 1.15 |
NSR has been calculated with concentrate characteristics and marketing terms supplied by Golden Minerals. Metal contributions are dependent on the concentrate and mineral type, and the overall recoveries are shown in Table 4.
Table 4: NSR metallurgical recovery assumptions
Metal | Sulfide |
Au | 67 |
Ag | 90 |
Pb | 72 |
Zn | 77 |
Velardeña Properties Activities
Given the current high precious metals prices, the advancement of alternative processing technologies in the industry, and the results of our testing activities prompted us to pursue the preparation of an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of our Velardeña project. In April 2020 we announced positive results from the updated PEA. The updated PEA was prepared to incorporate new and updated elements of the project database, mine plan and processing plan, most notably the inclusion of bio-oxidation treatment of gold-bearing pyrite concentrates. In late 2019, we obtained successful results from testing Velardeña gold concentrate material using Finnish firm Outotec’s “BIOX” process, a sustainable technology that was developed to pre-treat refractory ores and concentrates ahead of conventional cyanide leaching. The gold in these types of mineralized materials, such as those found at Velardeña, is encapsulated in pyrite and arsenopyrite which prevents the gold from being successfully cyanide leached. BIOX utilizes bacteria to oxidize these sulfide minerals, thereby exposing the gold for subsequent cyanide leaching and increasing overall gold recoveries. The 2019 BIOX testing of Velardeña material achieved gold recoveries of 92% from the pyrite-arsenopyrite concentrate, compared to sub-30% gold recoveries realized when the Velardeña Properties last operated in 2015. Tests completed in 2021 and 2022 confirm these results. During 2022, we plan to continue to optimize the mine plan and processing details in preparation for future test-mining and processing in advance of establishing a definite schedule for restarting commercial mineral extraction at the Velardeña mines and the installation of the bio-oxidation circuit. No decision has been made regarding a potential restart of the Velardeña property. mines, however, discussions are in progress regarding the potential to restart mining and flotation processing once the construction of the bio-oxidation facility has been approved.
29
Infrastructure
The Velardeña and Chicago veins strike northeastMines are fully developed underground with 10,122 meters of drift and dip steeply southeast. Chicago ore tendsramp development and 2,278 meters of raise development. Surface installations include maintenance shops, offices, and systems for water, electricity, and compressed air as required for undergound mining.
We own the equipment required for mining. The key pieces of equipment include scoop-trams, underground trucks and drilling jumbos. The current equipment fleet is expected to be higher in leadadequate to achieve the 310 t/d of mill feed for
30
processing and zinc than the Santa Juana ore. Vein widths at Chicago are variable and tendno additional material equipment is expected to be narrower than atpurchased. We also own the Santa Juana deposit, especiallyjacklegs required for stoping and underground development (narrow drifts) and ventilation equipment in use underground.
Plant 1 is designed to process sulfide material in a conventional flow sheet of crushing, grinding, and differential flotation to produce three separate concentrates: lead-silver, zinc, and pyrite.
Figure 1 shows the skarn host.processing flow sheet for Plant 1
2014 Technical Report
Figure 1: Process plant flow sheet for Plant 1
During the first quarter of 2015, the engineering firm of Tetra Tech, Inc. (“Tetra Tech”) completed an estimate of mineralized material at the Velardeña Properties, set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Silver |
| Gold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Ag) |
| (Au) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Grade |
| Grade |
| Lead |
|
|
|
|
| Tonnes |
| (Grams |
| (Grams |
| (Pb) |
|
|
|
|
| (in |
| per |
| per |
| Grade |
| Zinc (Zn) |
|
Mineralized Material |
| thousands) |
| tonne) |
| tonne) |
| % |
| Grade % |
|
Mineralized Material at December 31, 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velardeña Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| 572 |
| 295 |
| 4.1 |
| 1.34 |
| 1.07 |
|
Sulfide |
| 1,032 |
| 274 |
| 3.9 |
| 1.11 |
| 1.42 |
|
Chicago Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| 91 |
| 208 |
| 3.2 |
| 3.77 |
| 2.8 |
|
Sulfide |
| 98 |
| 165 |
| 2.8 |
| 2.97 |
| 3.49 |
|
Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2016 |
| 1,793 |
| 272 |
| 3.8 |
| 1.42 |
| 1.49 |
|
Note: Results may not tie precisely due to rounding.
The Tetra Tech mineralized material estimate assumedsulfide plant was originally constructed in 1966 and has been upgraded and rebuilt several times, most recently in 2014 prior to use in 2015 and in 2017 in preparation for a silver pricere-start of $25 per troy ounce, a gold price of $1,446 per troy ounce, and a cutoff grade of a net smelter return (“NSR”) of $100 per tonne.
The following table shows the commodity prices and metallurgical recoveries used to determine the cutoff grade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sulfide |
| Oxide |
| Mixed |
|
|
|
|
|
| Metallurgical |
| Metallurgical |
| Metallurgical |
|
|
|
|
|
| Recovery |
| Recovery |
| Recovery |
|
Metal |
| Metal Prices* |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| |
Silver |
| $ | 25 (oz) |
| 89 |
| 68 |
| 50 |
|
Gold |
| $ | 1,446 (oz) |
| 68 |
| 71 |
| 29 |
|
Lead |
| $ | 0.96 (lb) |
| 83 |
| — |
| 25 |
|
Zinc |
| $ | 0.91 (lb) |
| 83 |
| — |
| 37 |
|
* Amounts represent three-year average prices.
The cutoff grade of $100 NSR per tonne of mineralized material was determined by adding the estimated average costs of mining ($53 per tonne), processing ($27 per tonne) and general and administration ($20 per tonne). The average cost estimates are the same for both the Velardeña and Chicago mines.Mines. The NSR value of mineralized material was determined for each type of mineralized material (sulfide, mixed, and oxide) by multiplying a fractional factor that
20
represents an estimated combination of metallurgical recovery, treatment charges, penalties and payment terms by the unit value of each metal and then multiplying by the expected amount of that metal in each block of inventoried material.
The following table shows the reduction in mineralized material reported in the Tetra Tech report that resulted from extraction and processing of mineralized material in 2015. As a result of the shutdown of mining and processing in November 2015, there are no results for 2016, 2017 or 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Silver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gold |
|
|
| (Ag) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Au) |
|
|
| Grade |
| Contained |
| Lead |
| Contained |
|
|
| Contained |
|
|
|
|
| Grade |
| Contained |
| (Grams |
| Silver (Ag) |
| (Pb) |
| Lead (Pb) |
| Zinc |
| Zinc (Zn) |
|
|
| Tonnes |
| (Grams |
| Gold (Au) |
| per |
| oz. |
| Grade |
| lbs. |
| (Zn) |
| lbs. |
|
Mineralized Material |
| (in thousands) |
| per tonne) |
| oz. |
| tonne) |
| (in thousands) |
| % |
| (in thousands) |
| Grade % |
| (in thousands) |
|
Mineralized Material at December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velardeña Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| 572 |
| 4.1 |
| 74,780 |
| 295 |
| 5,425 |
| 1.34 |
| 16,898 |
| 1.07 |
| 13,493 |
|
Sulfide |
| 1,032 |
| 3.9 |
| 127,741 |
| 274 |
| 9,101 |
| 1.11 |
| 25,254 |
| 1.42 |
| 32.307 |
|
Chicago Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| 91 |
| 3.2 |
| 9,362 |
| 208 |
| 609 |
| 3.77 |
| 7,563 |
| 2.8 |
| 5,617 |
|
Sulfide |
| 98 |
| 2.8 |
| 8,822 |
| 165 |
| 520 |
| 2.97 |
| 6,417 |
| 3.49 |
| 7,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2017 |
| 1,793 |
| 3.8 |
| 220,406 |
| 272 |
| 15,655 |
| 1.42 |
| 56,132 |
| 1.49 |
| 58,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 Extraction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velardeña Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Sulfide |
| 76 |
| 2.6 |
| 6,371 |
| 156 |
| 383 |
| 0.8 |
| 1,343 |
| 1.09 |
| 1,839 |
|
Chicago Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Sulfide |
| 5 |
| 1.9 |
| 310 |
| 117 |
| 19 |
| 2 |
| 220 |
| 2.82 |
| 311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tonnes Extracted in 2018 |
| 81 |
| 2.6 |
| 6,681 |
| 154 |
| 401 |
| 0.87 |
| 1,564 |
| 1.2 |
| 2,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal loss adjustments during 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velardeña Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Sulfide |
| — |
| — |
| (3,063) |
| — |
| (290) |
| — |
| (522) |
| — |
| (547) |
|
Chicago Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Sulfide |
| — |
| — |
| (140) |
| — |
| (8) |
| — |
| (107) |
| — |
| (74) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tonnes Extracted in 2018 |
| — |
| — |
| (3,203) |
| — |
| (297) |
| — |
| (629) |
| — |
| (621) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineralized Material at December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velardeña Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| 572 |
| 4.1 |
| 74,780 |
| 295 |
| 5,425 |
| 1.34 |
| 16,898 |
| 1.07 |
| 13,493 |
|
Sulfide |
| 956 |
| 3.9 |
| 118,308 |
| 274 |
| 8,429 |
| 1.11 |
| 23,389 |
| 1.42 |
| 29,921 |
|
Chicago Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide and mixed |
| 91 |
| 3.2 |
| 9,362 |
| 208 |
| 609 |
| 3.77 |
| 7,563 |
| 2.8 |
| 5,617 |
|
Sulfide |
| 93 |
| 2.8 |
| 8,372 |
| 165 |
| 493 |
| 2.97 |
| 6,089 |
| 3.49 |
| 7,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2018 |
| 1,712 |
| 3.8 |
| 210,522 |
| 272 |
| 14,956 |
| 1.43 |
| 53,940 |
| 1.49 |
| 56,187 |
|
Note: Results may not tie precisely due to rounding. Additionally, silver ounces, zinc pounds and leads pounds are rounded to the nearest thousand and gold ounces are rounded to the nearest ounce and tonnes. The variance in rounding different commodities and units is for convenience and does not reflect any differences in the level of accuracy of the calculated mineralized material estimate.
For further detail regarding mineralized material, see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL”.
21
Velardeña Properties Activities
In 2018 we incurred approximately $1.9 million in expenses related to shut down costs and maintenance at our Velardeña Properties as a result of the suspension of mining and processing activities in November 2015. We retained a core group of employees, most assigned to operate the oxide plant that is leased to a third party and not affected by the shutdown. The retained employees also include an exploration group and an operations and administrative group to continue to advance our plans in Mexico, oversee corporate compliance activities, and to maintain and safeguard the longer termbook value of the Velardeña assets.
In July 2015 we entered into a leasing agreement with Hecla to lease our Velardeña oxide plant for an initial termas of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. The lease agreement contained several lease extension options, and in the third quarter 2016, the lease was extended through June 2017. The 2016 extension included an agreement under which Hecla would construct, at its cost, certain tailings expansion facilities to accommodate Hecla's increased use of tailings capacity in excess of an agreed amount, while preserving flexibility for future tailings expansions. The tailings expansion has since been completed. The parties agreed that Hecla would either leave unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost. In connection with their agreement regarding tailings impoundment expansions, the parties agreed that Hecla had the right to extend the lease for an additional 18 months following June 30, 2017, or until December 31, 2018. On March 24, 2017, Hecla exercised its right to extend the lease until December 31, 2018.2021 is $0.4 million.
On August 2, 2017, we granted HeclaThe oxide processing plant at Velardeña is a conventional agitated cyanide leach facility and has an option to extend the oxide plant lease for an additional periodoperating capacity of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 (the “Extension Period”). In October 2018, Hecla exercised its option550 tpd depending on material hardness and extended the lease to December 31, 2020. All of the fixed feesgrind size requirements. It is in excellent working condition and throughput related charges remain the same as under the original lease. Similar volume limitations apply to any required future tailings expansions, which Hecla will fund, leaving unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacityis currently in the expanded tailings facility. Hecla has the right to terminate the lease during the Extension Perioduse processing mineralized material from our Rodeo Mine (see Rodeo Mine above for any reason with 120 days’ notice. Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following a termination notice through December 31, 2020 if we decide to use the oxide plant for its our own purposes before December 31, 2020.
Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenancedetails of the oxide plant. Duringplant). In the year endedfuture, if we re-start mineral extraction at the Velardeña and Chicago Mines and construct the proposed bio-oxidation facility, we plan to process oxidized concentrates and oxidized mineralized material from the Velardeña
31
Properties at Plant 2. The plant was initially constructed in 1996 and improved in 2005 and again in 2012 and 2021. The book value of the plant as of December 31, 2018, Hecla processed approximately 142,000 tonnes of material through the oxide plant, resulting in total revenues to us of approximately $7.2 million, comprised of approximately $4.9 million for direct plant charges and fixed fees and approximately $2.3 million for other net reimbursable costs related to the services we provide under the lease. The $2.3 million of reimbursable costs are also reported as plant lease costs, resulting in net operating margin of approximately $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. We expect Hecla to continue to process material near the intended approximately 400 tonnes per day rate during 2019, which would generate cash payments to us, net of reimbursable costs, of approximately $4.6 million during 2019. However, because Hecla has the right to terminate the lease on 120 days’ notice, there2021 is no assurance that these amounts will be received.$1.7 million.
Mining and Processing
Aside from some minor test mining and crushing activities, there were no mining or processing activities, other than the Hecla lease, at our Velardeña Properties in 2017 or 2018 as a result of the shutdown of the mining and sulfide processing activities in November 2015. We expect to incur approximately $0.4 million in quarterly holding costs for as long as mining and processing activities remain suspended.
Environmental Matters and Permitting
We hold environmental licenses and environmental impact assessments that allow us to run our mines, plants and tailing facilities at our Velardeña Properties. We are required to update our environmental licenses and environmental impact assessments for expansion of or modification to any of the existing two processing plants. The construction of new
22
infrastructure beyond the current plant facilities also would require additional permitting, which could include environmental impact assessments and land use permits.
Certain Laws Affecting Mining in Mexico
Mexico, officially the United Mexican States, is a federal constitutional republic in North America and bordered by the United States of America, Belize and Guatemala. Mexico is a federal democratic republic with 31 states and Mexico City. Each state has its own constitution and its citizens elect a governor, as well as representatives, to their respective state congresses. The President of Mexico is the head of the executive federal government. Executive power is exercised by the President, while legislative power is vested in the two chambers of the Congress of the Union. The three constitutional powers are the Judiciary, the Executive and the Legislature which are independent of each other.
Legislation Affecting Mining
The Mining Law, originally published in 1992 and amended in 1996, 2005, 2006 and 2014, is the primary legislation governing mining activities in Mexico. Other significant legislation applicable to mining in Mexico includes the regulations to the Mining Law, the Federal Law of Waters, the Federal LabourLabor Law, the Federal Law of Fire Arms and Explosives, the General Law on Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection and regulations, the Federal Law of Duties and the Federal Law on Metrology and Standards.
The Concession System
Under Mexican law, mineral deposits are property of the Mexican republic, and a mining concession, granted by the executive branch of the federal government, is required for the exploration, exploitation and processing of mineral deposits. Mining concessions may only be granted to Mexican individuals domiciled in Mexico or companies incorporated and validly existing under the laws of Mexico. Mexican companies that have foreign shareholders must register with the National Registry of Foreign Investments and renew their registration on an annual basis. Mining concessions grant rights to explore and exploit mineral deposits but do not grant surface rights over the land where the concession is located. Mining concession holders are required to negotiate surface access with the land owner or holder (e.g., agrarian communities) or, should such negotiations prove unsuccessful, file an application with the corresponding administrative authority (Ministry of Economy or Ministry of Agrarian-Territorial-Urban Development) to obtain an easement, temporary occupancy, or expropriation of the land, as the case may be. An application for a concession must be filed with the Mining Agency or Mining Delegation located closest to the area to which the application relates.
Mining concessions have a term of 50 years from the date on which title is recorded in the Public Registry of Mining. Holders of mining concessions are required to comply with various obligations, including the payment of certain mining duties based on the number of hectares of the concession and the number of years the concession has been in effect. Failure to pay the mining duties can lead to cancellation of the relevant concession. Holders of mining concessions are also obliged to carry out and prove assessment works in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Mining Law and its regulations. The regulations to the Mining Law establish minimum amounts that must be spent or invested on mining activities. A report must be filed in May of each year regarding the assessment works carried out during the preceding year. The mining authorities may impose a fine on the mining concession holder if one or more proof of assessment work reports is not timely filed.
32
Pursuant to amendments to the federal corporate income tax law, effective January 2014, additional duties are imposed on mining concession holders; see “—Taxes in Mexico”.
Environmental Legislation
Mining projects in Mexico are subject to Mexican federal, state and municipal environmental laws and regulations for the protection of the environment. The principal legislation applicable to mining projects in Mexico is the federal
23
General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection, which is enforced by the Federal Bureau of Environmental Protection, commonly known as “PROFEPA”. PROFEPA is the federal entity in charge of carrying out environmental inspections and negotiating compliance agreements. Voluntary environmental audits, coordinated through PROFEPA, are encouraged under the federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection. PROFEPA monitors compliance with environmental legislation and enforces Mexican environmental laws, regulations and official standards. If warranted, PROFEPA may initiate administrative proceedings against companies that violate environmental laws, which proceedings may result in the temporary or permanent closure of non-complying facilities, the revocation of operating licenses and/or other sanctions or fines. According to the Federal Criminal Code, PROFEPA must inform the relevant governmental authorities of any environmental crimes that are committed by a mining company in Mexico.
Concession holders under the exploration stage may submit themselves to comply with the Mexican Official Norm: NOM-120-SEMARNAT-1997, which provides, among other things, that mining exploration activities to be carried out within certain areas must be conducted in accordance with the environmental standards set forth in NOM-120-SEMARNAT-1997; otherwise, concession holders are required to file a preventive report or an environmental impact study prior to the commencement of the exploration, exploitation and processing of mineral resources. An environmental impact study is required for exploitation and processing of mineral resources activities.
In 2014 Mexico developed an energy policy applicable to private investment companies whereby new mining concessions are now subject to prior approval from the Ministry of Energy. Current mining concessions forming the Velardeña Properties are not subject to or affected by this approval requirement, but any new mining concessions acquired will be subject to this additional approval.
Taxes in Mexico
Mexico has a federal corporate income tax rate of 30%, and there are no state taxes on corporate net income. In determining their corporate income tax, entities are allowed to subtract from gross income various deductions permitted by law, and they are allowed a ten-year carry-forward of net operating losses. Pursuant to amendments to the federal tax laws effective January 1, 2014, a 10% withholding tax is charged on dividends distributed to shareholders, regardless of the tax residence of the recipient, out of after tax profits. However, in the case of nonresident shareholders the limitations and tax rates provided in the treaties to avoid double taxation will prevail. A foreign resident company is subject to income tax if it has a permanent establishment in Mexico. In general, a permanent establishment is a place of business where the activities of an enterprise are totally or partially carried out and includes, among others, offices, branches and mining sites.
Under the 2014 amendments to the federal corporate income tax law, titleholders of mining concessions are required to pay an annual special duty of 7.5% of their mining related profits. Titleholders of mining concessions also are required to pay a 0.5% special mining duty, or royalty, on an annual basis, on revenues obtained from the sale of silver, gold and platinum. Both the 7.5% annual special duty and the 0.5% duty are due at the end of March each year. The special duty of 7.5% is generally applicable to earnings before income tax, depreciation, depletion, amortization, and interest. In calculating the special duty of 7.5%, there are no deductions related to depreciable costs from operational fixed assets, but exploration and prospecting depreciable costs are deductible when incurred. Both duties are tax deductible for income tax purposes.
33
Mexico has several taxes in addition to income tax that are relevant to most business operations, including (i) the Value Added Tax (“VAT”); (ii) import duties; (iii) various payroll taxes; and (iv) statutorily entitled employee profit sharing (“PTU”). In addition, annual mining concession fees are charged by the government.
VAT in Mexico is charged upon alienation of goods, performance of independent services, grant of temporary use or exploitation of goods, or import of goods or services that occur within Mexico’s borders, at a rate of 16%. There is no VAT in the case of export of goods or services or for the sale of gold, jewelry, and gold metalwork with a minimum gold content of 80%, excluding retail sale to the general public. The sale of mining concessions is subject to VAT as
24
concessions are not considered to be land. VAT paid by a business enterprise on its purchases and expenses may usually be credited against its liability for VAT collected from customers on its own sales. This creditable VAT may also be directly refunded, but under new regulations beginning in January 2019, the creditable VAT can no longer offset other Mexican federal taxes. At December 31, 2021, the Company recorded a net VAT receivable in Mexico of $1.3 million, related to the Velardeña Properties and the Rodeo operations. The Company expects that the current amounts will be recovered within a one-year period.
Import duties apply for goods and services entering the country, unless specifically exempted due to a free trade agreement or registered under specific programs like IMMEX, under which we are currently registered.IMMEX. Payroll taxes are payable in most states including Durango and Coahuila, and social security, housing and pension contributions must be made to the federal government when paying salaries.
Employees of Mexico entities are statutorily entitled to a portion of the employer’s pre-tax profits, called PTU. The rate of profit sharing is currently 10% of the employer’s taxable income as defined by the Income Tax law. A taxpayer may reduce its income tax base by an amount equal to the PTU. Certain companies are exempt from paying PTU, which include companies in the extractive industry (principally the mining industry) during the period of exploration.
El Quevar
Location and Access
Our El Quevar silver exploration project is located at 24° 34’ 55.2” S latitude and 66° 50’ 34.8” W longitude in the San Antonio de los Cobres municipality, Salta Province, in the altiplano region of northwestern Argentina, approximately 300 kilometers by road northwest of the city of Salta, the capital city of the province. The project is also accessible by a 300-kilometer dirt and gravel road from the city of Calama in northern Chile. The small village of Pocitos, located about 20 kilometers to the west of El Quevar, is the nearest settlement. We have established a camp approximately 10 kilometers west of the project to house project workers. A high-tension power line is located approximately 40 kilometers from the site, and a high-pressure gas line devoted to the mining industry and subsidized by the Salta government is located within four kilometers of the El Quevar camp. There is a permitted well for non-potable water on the property with ample volume for exploration purposes and with potential to be increased to accommodate future production needs.
The El Quevar project is located near Nevado Peak with altitudes at the concessions ranging from 3,800 to 6,130 meters above sea level. The climate of the area is high mountain desert, with some precipitation in summer (such as snow) and little snow in winter. The following map shows the location of the El Quevar project.
34
Property History
Mining activity in and around the El Quevar project dates back at least 80 years. Between 1930 and 1950, there was lead and silver extraction from small workings in the area, but we have no mining records from that period. The first organized exploration activities on the property occurred during the 1970s, although no data from that period remains. Over the last 30 years, several companies have carried out exploration activity in the area, including BHP Billiton, Industrias Peñoles, Mansfield Minerals and Hochschild Mining Group, consisting primarily of local sampling with some limited drilling programs.
Title and Ownership Rights
According to Argentine law, mineral resources are subject to regulation in the provinces where the resources are located. Each province has the authority to grant mining exploration permits and mining exploitation concession rights to applicants. The Federal Congress has enacted the National Mining Code and other substantive mining legislation, which is applicable throughout Argentina; however, each province has the authority to regulate the procedural aspects of the National Mining Code and to organize the enforcement authority within its own territory.
In the province of Salta, where the El Quevar project is located, all mining concessions are granted by a judge in the Salta Mining Court. The El Quevar project is comprised of exploitation concessions. Exploitation concessions are subject to a canon payment fee (maintenance fee) which is paid in advance twice a year (before June 30th and December 31st of each calendar year). Each time a new mining concession is granted, concession holders are exempt from
35
the canon payment fee for a period of three years from the concession grant date. However, this exemption does not apply to the grant of vacant exploitation concessions; only to the grant of new mining concessions.
The El Quevar project is currently comprised of 31 mining concessions that we hold directly or indirectly through ourwholly-owned subsidiaries. In total, the El Quevar project encompasses approximately 57,000 hectares. The area of most of our exploration activities at El Quevar is within the concessions that are owned by Silex Argentina S.A., our wholly-owned subsidiary.
We are required to pay a 1% net smelter return royalty on the value of all minerals extracted from the El Quevar II concession and a 1% net smelter return royalty on one-half of the minerals extracted from the Castor concession to the third party that owns the royalties on these concessions. We can purchase one half of the royalty for $1 million in the first two years of mining. The Yaxtché deposit is located primarily on the Castor concession. We may also be required to pay a 3% royalty to the Salta Province based on the net smelter value of minerals extracted from any of our concessions less costs of processing. To maintain all of the El Quevar concessions, we paid canon payment fees to the Argentine government of approximately $22,000 and $18,000 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. In 2022 we expect to pay approximately $14,000.
36
The following El Quevar mine concessions are identified below by name and file number in the Salta Province Registry of Mines.
Name of Mine Concession | | Concession | |
Quevar II | | 17114 | |
Quirincolo I | | 18036 | |
Quirincolo II | | 18037 | |
Castor | | 3902 | |
Vince | | 1578 | |
Armonia | | 1542 | |
Quespejahuar | | 12222 | |
Toro I | | 18332 | |
Quevar Primera | | 19534 | |
Quevar Novena | | 20215 | |
Quevar Decimo Tercera | | 20501 | |
Quevar Tercera | | 19557 | |
Quevar Vigesimo Tercero | | 21043 | |
Quevar 10 | | 20219 | |
Quevar Vigesimo Primera | | 20997 | |
Quevar Vigesimo Septima | | 22403 | |
Quevar IV | | 19558 | |
Quevar Vigesimo Cuarto | | 21044 | |
Quevar 11 | | 20240 | |
Quevar Quinta | | 19617 | |
Quevar 12 | | 20360 | |
Quevar Decima Quinta | | 20445 | |
Quevar Sexta | | 19992 | |
Quevar 19 | | 20706 | |
Quevar Vigesimo Sexta | | 22087 | |
Quevar Vigesimo Segundo | | 21042 | |
Quevar Séptima | | 20319 | |
Quevar Veinteava | | 20988 | |
Mariana | | 15190 | |
Arjona II | | 18080 | |
Quevar Vigesimo Quinto | | 21054 | |
The surface rights at El Quevar are controlled by the Salta Province. There are no private properties within the concession area. To date, no issues involving surface rights have impacted the project. Although we have unrestricted access to our facilities, we have been granted easements to further protect our access rights.
Barrick Earn-In Agreement
In April 2020, we entered into the Earn-In Agreement with Barrick, pursuant to which Barrick has acquired an option (the “Option”) to earn a 70% interest in the Company’s El Quevar. Pursuant to the terms of the Earn-In Agreement,
37
in order to earn an undivided 70% interest in the El Quevar project, Barrick must: (A) incur a total of $10 million in work expenditures over a total of eight years ($0.5 million per year in years one and two, $1.0 million per year in years three, four and five, and $2.0 million per year in years six, seven and eight); (B) deliver to the Company a National Instrument 43-101 compliant pre-feasibility study pursuant to the parameters set forth in the Earn-In Agreement; and (C) deliver a written notice to exercise the Option to us within the term of the Earn-In Agreement. Barrick may withdraw from the Earn-In Agreement at any time after spending a minimum of $1.0 million in work expenditures and upon providing us with 30 days’ notice. As of September 30, 2021, Barrick had met the $1 million in work expenditures that would allow them to withdraw from the Earn-in Agreement.
Upon satisfaction of the earn-in conditions and exercise of the Option, we will form a new entity (“NewCo”) that will hold the El Quevar properties. NewCo will be 70% owned by Barrick and 30% owned by us. Funding of NewCo will be based on Barrick’s and our respective ownership, and industry standard dilution mechanisms will apply in the case of funding shortfalls by either shareholder.
During the earn-in period, originally scheduled from April 9, 2020 to April 9, 2028, in addition to the exploration spending, Barrick will fund the holding costs of the property, which will qualify as work expenditures. Barrick will reimburse us for expenses related to maintaining the exploration camp which will initially be run by us under a service agreement, which will also qualify as work expenditures. Through December 31, 2021, approximately $0.9 million of expenses incurred by us were reimbursed under the Earn-In Agreement.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and related legal restrictions on mining exploration in Salta, Argentina, Barrick declared a force majeure event under the Earn-In Agreement. As a result of the force majeure event, the earn-in period and other applicable deadlines in the Earn-In Agreement were extended by 119 days. The force majeure event is no longer in effect and Barrick has commenced activities at the site.
Geology and Mineralization
The geology of the El Quevar project is characterized by silver-rich veins and disseminations in Tertiary volcanic rocks that are part of an eroded stratovolcano. Silver mineralization at El Quevar is hosted within a broad, generally east-west-trending structural zone and occurs as a series of north-dipping parallel sheeted vein zones, breccias and mineralized faults situated within an envelope of pervasively silicified brecciated volcanic rocks. There are at least three sub-parallel structures that extend for an aggregate length of approximately 6.5 kilometers. Several volcanic domes (small intrusive bodies) have been identified and mineralization is also found in breccias associated with these domes, especially where they are intersected by the structures. The silver mineralization at the Yaxtché zone is of epithermal origin. The cross-cutting nature of the mineralization, the assemblage of sulfide and alteration minerals, and the presence of open spaces with euhedral minerals, all point to an origin at shallow to moderate depths (a few hundred meters below surface) from hydrothermal solutions.
Exploration Properties
In addition to Rodeo, Velardeña and El Quevar, we currently control a portfolio of approximately 12 exploration properties located primarily in certain traditional precious metals producing regions of Mexico.Mexico, Nevada and Argentina. We do not consider any of our exploration properties to be individually material, including those noted below.
In 20192022 we plan to focus our exploration efforts primarily on explorationevaluating and evaluation activities at El Quevar, Yoquivo, Navegantes and other properties, primarilysearching for mining opportunities in North America.America with near term prospects of mining. We are also focused on continuing our exploration efforts on selected properties in our portfolio. During 20192022 we expect our expenditures for the exploration program to total approximately $2.0$4.1 million, with approximately $0.3 million in property holding costs in Mexico, $0.1 million in holding costs in Nevada and approximately $0.5$1.3 million in other administrative and general reconnaissance costs in Mexico.Mexico, Argentina and the US.
38 |
|
In August 2014, we entered into
A brief discussion of certain of our exploration properties is below. We do not believe any of the below are individually material to us at this time.
Yoquivo
The Yoquivo property was acquired in 2017 and with the 2019 additional acquisition of a claim internal to the exterior boundary the project consists of 1,975 hectares in 7 claims that cover an epithermal vein district hosted in Tertiary andesitic volcanic rocks that is exposed in an erosional window through Oligocene rhyolite on the eastern margin of the Sierra Madre Occidental of northern Mexico. The property is 200 km SW of Chihuahua city in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. Surface rock sampling done in 2018 demonstrated gold and silver values of potential economic interest in several of the veins in the district. We have an option agreement giving usto purchase the right to acquire for $1.2 million the Santa Maria mine, a privately held property comprised of a single mining claim of 18 hectares west of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua State, Mexico. Since 2015, we have completed test mining and processing of approximately 7,100 dry tonnes from the Santa Maria mine, with average grades of 338 gpt silver and 0.8 gpt gold. In March 2017, a preliminary economic assessment (PEA) was completed on our behalf by the engineering firm Tetra Tech, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on an updated estimate of mineralized material. The PEA presented a base case assessment of developing Santa Maria’s mineral deposit. In September 2018, Tetra Tech completed a second PEA for the Santa Maria project that incorporates data accumulated since March 2017, including an additional 77 hectares of mineral tenure acquired in August 2017 that covers the on-strike and downdip extensions of the Santa Maria vein systems. The new PEA also incorporates information from a 22-hole, 4,800-meter drilling program begun in August 2017 and completed in April 2018. Including the latest drill program, we have drilled 9,900 meters in 59 holes since acquiring the property. Surface mapping and sampling has also identified additional high-grade veins on the adjacent eastern extension of the Santa Maria property and new veins to the north located outside of the mineralized material area as defined in the March 2017 PEA.
The September 2018 PEA shows improvement in projected cash flow, metal production and profitability compared to the previous study. The PEA estimates a 4.2-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at an average mine production rate of 218 tonnes per day, using a combination of cut-and-fill and sublevel stoping. It is currently envisioned that both mixed and sulfide materials will undergo toll-milling at a local third-party facility with sulfide flotation circuits. Oxide material will be cyanide leached at the same toll-milling facility. In the PEA, Santa Maria is estimated to deliver 150,000 tonnes of diluted sulfide material to the mill at an average grade of 378 g/t silver equivalent (“AgEq”, calculated by combining Ag and Au values where one g/t of Au equals 74 g/t of Ag),
25
116,000 tonnes of diluted oxide material at an average grade of 428 g/t AgEq and 42,000 tonnes of diluted mixed material at an average grade of 278 g/t tonne AgEq.
We have the right to acquire 100% of the Santa Maria property under two separate option agreements representing the totalsix concessions that comprise the Yoquivo property for additional payments of $1.0 million, payable through April 2022. The first option agreement, covering concessions we acquired in August 2014, requires an additional approximately $0.4 million be paid to acquire a 100% interest in the concessions related to that option by continuing to make minimum payments of $0.2 million in 2019 and, $0.2 million in 2020. In addition, until the total due under the first option agreement has been paid, the property owners have the right to 50% of any net profits from mining activities from the concessions related to the option, after reimbursement of all costs incurred by us since April 2015, to the extent that such net profit payments exceed the minimum payments. The second option agreement, covering concessions acquired in August 2017, requires an additional $0.6 million be paid to acquire a 100% interest in the concessions related to that option by making additional payments of $0.2 million in each of the years 2019 through 2021.
|
We acquired the Rodeo and Rodeo 2 claims comprising 1,866 hectares 80 kilometers west of the Velardeña Properties in Durango, Mexico where previous exploration by other companies has identified a gold-bearing epithermal system exposed at the surface. During 2016, we completed a 2,080 meter core drilling program at the Rodeo property at a cost of approximately $0.4 million. The results from the program show a gold and silver bearing epithermal vein and breccia system with encouraging gold and silver values over an approximate 50 to 70 meter true width. The system is exposed at the top of a northwesterly striking ridge and dips steeply to the northeast over about one kilometer of strike length.
During January 2017, Tetra Tech completed an estimate of mineralized material at the Rodeo deposit, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on two different operating scenarios. The first operating scenario reflects a smaller amount of higher grade material and estimated mineralized material of 0.4 million tonnes containing 3.3 gpt gold and 11 gpt silver. This scenario provides a potentially shorter time to processing with lower capital costs since we already own the mill, located within trucking distance of the Rodeo property. The second operating scenario reflects a larger amount of lower grade material and estimated mineralized material of 3.6 million tonnes containing 0.8 gpt gold and 12 gpt silver. The second mineralized material estimate envisions a standalone heap leach operation, depending on leachability of the material and development and operating costs. We believe this material, as currently identified, could provide additional mined material for ourVelardeña oxide mill following the completion of the Hecla lease, currently set to expire December 31, 2020.
In initial test work conducted in 2017, we received confirmation of good gold and silver metallurgical recoveries for milled material in initial test work. Bottle roll cyanide leach testing of the high-grade samples resulted in gold extractions of 80 to 86 percent. Silver extractions ranged from 72 to 76 percent for all tests. Test work also indicates that the material is not suitable for gold and silver recovery by heap leaching.
Due to the extension of the lease period for the oxide mill, plans to advance the Rodeo project have been delayed until early 2020.
Yoquivo
In October 2017 we acquired the right to purchase claims covering the Yoquivo District, Ocampo Municipality, Chihuahua, Mexico through an option agreement. The Yoquivo District is a past producing, bonanza grade epithermal vein gold and silver district located 35 kilometers southeast of the Ocampo Mining District. We have the right to purchase six claims totaling 1,906 hectares for payment of $0.5$0.75 million over four years plus outstanding claim taxes totaling approximately $0.1 million. No cash paymentssubject to the owner are due until the second anniversary of the agreement. The owner retains a 2% net smelter returnto 3% NSR royalty on production, capped at $2.0$2.8 million.
26
In October 2018 we announced high-grade silver-gold assays from the Yoquivo project. Multiple silver-gold bearing epithermal veins were mapped and sampled, with the two most important veins being the San Francisco and Pertenencia veins. A new vein, the La Nina vein, was discovered in the northwest of the property where it splits off from the main San Francisco vein. We are focusing exploration effortsTwo other veins, the Esperanza and El Dolar veins have been identified and sampled. Based on sampling and mapping we have identified the most attractive targets on the Pertenencia vein, which appearsproperty and have permits in hand to be more silver-rich compared toinitiate the San Francisco vein. Sampling of the Pertenencia vein is still in progress as is surface work in preparation for identifying the best drill targets. We expect to beginprogram. In September 2020 we began a 3,400-meter, 15-hole drill program in 2019 to test the most promising portions of the veins. A permitWe completed the drill program in December 2020 and identified four separate vein systems in which surface sampling has returned attractive grades. We announced the drill results in January 2021, which identified four veins with potentially economic gold-silver grades, including a newly discovered vein without previous historic mining within the district scale property holdings. We began a second phase drill program in October 2021. The drill program included 3,949 meters comprised of 21 holes exploring the Pertenencia, Esperanza and Dolar vein systems. We believe the drill program demonstrated the potential for drilling has been obtained.
Navegantes
In November 2018, we acquired the Navegantes project in southern Chihuahua state, Mexico. Recent surfacePertenencia vein to host significant high-grade mineralization and underground sampling have returnedhit multiple high-grade silver values from a series of epithermal silver-base metal veins, outcroppingsuggesting there may be additional blind veins to be found on the property. The project consistsWe recently submitted an application with SEMARNAT for a 50-hole, 10,000 meter drill program, which we plan to commence in 2022 upon receipt of six concessions totaling 521 hectares and isnecessary permits.
Sarita Este
In December 2019 we paid $150,000 to enter into an option agreement with Cascadero Minerals Corporation (“Cascadero”) to acquire a 51% interest in the gold/copper Sarita Este concession, located approximately 60kmin the northwest portion of the San Francisco del Oro-Santa Barbara District whereProvince of Salta, Argentina, located near the Taca Taca project owned by First Quantum Minerals. The option agreement called for us to spend at least $0.3 million in exploration expenditures and complete a 2,000-meter drill program by the end of 2021, another $0.5 million by the end of 2022, and another approximately $1.6 million by 2023 for a total $2.5 million. We have spent approximately $1.4 million since entering into the agreement in December 2019. In the fourth quarter of 2021 we completed the first drill program ever conducted at Sarita Este, which involved drilling 10 diamond drill holes totaling 2,518 meters to explore untested epithermal gold-silver and copper porphyry targets. In January 2022 we announced assay results from the drill program, which we believe indicate the potential for a significant gold system. We have submitted new permits for trenching and additional drilling that we plan to complete during a 2022 field campaign.
Santa Maria
On July 14, 2020, we entered into a binding letter of intent with Fabled Silver Gold Corp., formerly known as Fabled Copper Corp. (“Fabled”), for a potential transaction pursuant to which Fabled would acquire our option to earn a 100% interest in the Santa Maria mining claims located in Chihuahua, Mexico (the “Option”). On December 4, 2020, we entered into a definitive option agreement (the “Option Agreement”) to sell our Option to Fabled. The period to exercise the Option (the “Exercise Period”) expires on December 4, 2022, unless extended by the parties under the terms of the Option Agreement. As consideration for the Option, Fabled (i) paid $0.5 million in cash to us and issued to us one million
39
shares of Fabled’s common stock; (ii) paid $1.5 million in cash to the Company on the one year anniversary date following the closing of the Option Agreement; (iii) will pay $2.0 million in cash to the Company on the two year anniversary date following the closing of the Option Agreement; and (iv) upon exercise of the Option, will grant the Company a 1% net smelter return royalty on the Maria, Martia III, Maria II Frac. I, Santa Maria and Punto Com concessions (the “Concessions”). Pursuant to the Option Agreement, during the Exercise Period, Fabled is obligated to pay to each of the owners of the Concessions (the “Owners”) any remaining required payments due to the Owners pursuant to the various underlying option agreements between the Owners and the Company, and to make all payments and perform all other requirements needed to maintain the Concessions in good standing. Fabled has made the remaining payment due on the Marias option, which was the only remaining payment due. Should Fabled not complete its obligations described herein, the Santa Maria mining claims will revert to us and we will be entitled to keep any payments made by Fabled under the terms of the Option Agreement.
Sand Canyon
During the second quarter 2019 we entered into an earn-in agreement with Golden Gryphon Explorations for the Sand Canyon project located in northwestern Nevada, where surface work has identified a large system of epithermal veins with potential for gold and silver deposits. We hold an option to earn a 60% interest in the Sand Canyon project by spending $2.5 million in exploration expenses over five years, with guaranteed minimum expenditures of $0.5 million in year one. To continue to earn an interest in the project, we must spend at least $0.75 million in each of years two and four and $0.5 million in year five, and drill at least 5,000 feet of core or 10,000 feet of reverse circulation or a combination of the two, by the end of the second year. We paid $25,000 cash and $50,000 in reimbursed exploration expenditures to acquire the option and $35,000 cash in 2020 on the first anniversary of the agreement, and have made payments of a total additional $100,000 ($50,000 in 2021 and $50,000 in 2022). The drilling commitment was met in 2020.
We completed surface exploration activities on the project in late 2019, including mapping and geochemical sampling to identify drill targets. Based on this work and after securing drill permits, we initiated a drill program in the first quarter 2020. In March 2020 we completed the initial drill program of approximately 1,800 meters in 4 diamond drill holes. The drill holes were placed to target surface geochemical and geophysical anomalies associated with epithermal veining observed in outcrops. Drill holes tested the two principal epithermal vein target areas on the property, the DeLong Canyon target and the Sand Canyon target. The drill hole collared to test the DeLong Canyon target did not encounter any veins or significant anomalous geochemical values. Interpretation shows that a fault offset likely caused the drill hole to miss the vein system as projected from surface. The three drill holes collared to test the veins and anomalies in the Sand Canyon target area all intersected narrow vein and breccia structures with low anomalous values of Ag, As, Sb, and Mo. No potentially economic concentrations of precious metals were encountered in any of the four drill holes. Plans for further testing of the mineralized system are being considered. In the first year of exploration at Sand Canyon and through December 31, 2021, we spent $1.8 million toward the $2.5 million earn-in requirement, fulfilling the first- and second-year minimum expenditures and the minimum drill commitment.
Our Competitive Strengths and Business Strategy
Our business strategy is to establish Golden Minerals as a mid-tier precious metals mining company focused in North America and Argentina. We also review strategic opportunities from time to time.
Rodeo Property. As a result of our decision to commence mining operations at our Rodeo project, we now consider the Rodeo Property to be one of our material properties, along with the Velardeña Properties. We began mining at the Rodeo project in late December 2020 and began processing mined material from the Rodeo project in January 2021. We reached a steady state of throughput in April 2021 and exceeded our extraction guidance for Rodeo in 2021. Although short-lived, the Rodeo project is located.expected to provide free cash flow through the third quarter of 2023 that will enable us to continue to evaluate a potential restart of mining at theVelardeña Properties as well as to evaluate our other exploration properties.
Farm-outs, Royalties40
Velardeña Properties. Due to continuing net operating losses, we suspended mining and Other Dispositions
Exploration propertiessulfide processing activities at the Velardeña Properties during the first half of November 2015. In June 2021 we began limited scale mining activities at our Velardeña underground mine to obtain further bulk samples for use in final optimization of the bio-oxidation plant design and for use in additional flotation separation studies that will indicate how we can best separate the gold-bearing minerals into the pyrite-arsenopyrite concentrate that is proposed for processing in the bio-oxidation circuit. We are also testing mining methods to ensure that we choose notcan effectively control mining dilution to obtain the head grades that we expect based on our PEA study. We expect to have the results of these studies in early 2022. No decision has yet been made regarding a potential restart of the Velardeña mines.
Exploration Focus. We are focused on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America with high precious metal grades and low development costs with near term prospects of mining, and particularly properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña processing plants. We also continue to advance our El Quevar silver project in Salta Province, Argentina through an earn-in agreement with Barrick. And we are evaluated for joint venture, sale of all or a partial interest and royalty potential. We currently have minority ownership interests and/or royalties in or have disposed of the following properties that were once part ofcontinuing our exploration portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
efforts on selected properties in our portfolio of exploration properties located in Mexico, Nevada and Argentina.
Experienced Management Team. We are led by a team of mining professionals with approximately 60 years of combined experience in exploration, project development, and operations management, primarily in the Americas. Our executive officers have held senior positions at various large mining companies including, among others, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, INCO Limited, Meridian Gold Company, Barrick Gold Exploration and Noranda Exploration.
Executive Officers of Golden Minerals
Name | | Age | | Position |
Warren M. Rehn | |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Robert P. Vogels | |
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Warren M. Rehn. Mr. Rehn was appointed President of our company in May 2015 and appointed Chief Executive Officer and director in September 2015. Mr. Rehn previously served as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Chief Geologist since December 2012 and served as Vice President, Exploration and Chief Geologist since February 2012. From
27
2007 until February 2012, Mr. Rehn held various positions at Barrick Gold Exploration, Inc., serving most recently as Chief Exploration Geologist for the Bald Mountain and Ruby Hill mining units. From 2005 until 2007, Mr. Rehn was a consulting geologist for Gerson Lehman Group, which provides consulting services to various industries, including geology and mining. Mr. Rehn served as a Consulting Senior Geologist at Placer Dome Exploration, Inc. in 2004 and as an independent consulting geologist throughout the Americas from 1994 until 2003. He served as a Senior Geologist at Noranda Exploration, Inc. from 1988 until 1994. Mr. Rehn holds an M.S. in Geology from the Colorado School of Mines and a B.S. in Geological Engineering from the University of Idaho.
Robert P. Vogels. Mr. Vogels was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in March 2009. Mr. Vogels served as Controller of Apex Silver from January 2005 to March 2009 and was named Vice President in January 2006. Prior to joining Apex Silver, Mr. Vogels served as corporate controller for Meridian Gold Company from January 2004 until December 2004. He served as the controller of INCO Limited’s Goro project in New Caledonia from October 2002 to January 2004. Prior to joining INCO, Mr. Vogels worked from 1985 through October 2002 for Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, which was acquired in 1999 by Phelps Dodge Corp. During that time, he served in several capacities, including as the controller for its El Abra copper mine in Chile from 1997 until March 2002. Mr. Vogels began his career in public accounting as a CPA. He holds a B.Sc. in accounting and an MBA degree from Colorado State University.
BoardAs previously announced, Mr. Vogels plans to retire in 2022. Ms. Julie Weedman is expected to assume the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer role following Mr. Vogels’ departure. Ms. Weedman currently serves as the Company’s Vice President Finance. She previously served as Vice President Finance of DirectorsAerospace Contacts LLC
41
from March 2020 to January 2022. Ms. Weedman also served as controller for Cupric Canyon Capital LLC from March 2015 until December 2019 and as the corporate controller of GoldenMercator Minerals Ltd. from June 2012 to January 2015. Prior to joining Mercator, Ms. Weedman worked from 2006 to 2012 for Ducommun Corporation, serving in several capacities, including site controller and group controller for its Ducommun Technologies division. Prior to joining Ducommun, Ms. Weedman worked as the site controller for ST Microelectronics in Phoenix. She also spent 10 years at Phelps Dodge Corporation in various financial roles including assistant controller of Chino Mines Co. in Silver City, New Mexico. Ms. Weedman began her career in public accounting with Deloitte & Touche. She holds a B.S. in accountancy from Northern Arizona University.
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
Committee Membership
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Market Overview
We are an emerging precious metals exploration company with silver and gold mining properties in Mexico and a large advanced exploration silver project in Argentina. Descriptions of the markets for these metals are provided below.
Silver Market
Silver has traditionally served as a medium of exchange, much like gold. Silver’s strength, malleability, ductility, thermal and electrical conductivity, sensitivity to light and ability to endure extreme changes in temperature combine to make it a widely used industrial metal. While silver continues to be used as a form of investment and a financial asset, the principal uses of silver are industrial, primarily in electrical and electronic components, photography, jewelry, silverware, batteries, computer chips, electrical contacts, and high technology printing. Silver’s anti-bacterial properties also make it valuable for use in medicine and in water purification. Additionally, the use of silver in the photovoltaic and solar panel industries is growing rapidly, and new uses of silver are being developed in connection with the use of superconductive wire and radio frequency identification devices.
28
Most silver product is obtained from mining in which silver is not the principal or primary product. The Silver Institute, an international silver industry association, noted that for 20142018 only around 31%26% of output came from so-called primary silver mines, where silver is the main source of revenue.
42
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated on the London Fix high and low silver fixes in U.S. dollars per troy ounce. On February 26, 2019,March 21, 2021, the closing price of silver was $15.83$25.04 per troy ounce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Silver |
| ||||
Year |
| High |
| Low |
| ||
2011 |
| $ | 48.70 |
| $ | 26.16 |
|
2012 |
| $ | 37.23 |
| $ | 26.67 |
|
2013 |
| $ | 32.23 |
| $ | 18.61 |
|
2014 |
| $ | 22.05 |
| $ | 15.28 |
|
2015 |
| $ | 18.23 |
| $ | 13.71 |
|
2016 |
| $ | 20.71 |
| $ | 13.58 |
|
2017 |
| $ | 18.56 |
| $ | 15.22 |
|
2018 |
| $ | 17.52 |
| $ | 14.13 |
|
2019* |
| $ | 16.08 |
| $ | 15.26 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Silver |
| ||||
Year |
| High |
| Low |
| ||
2012 | | $ | 37.23 | | $ | 26.67 | |
2013 | | $ | 32.23 | | $ | 18.61 | |
2014 | | $ | 22.05 | | $ | 15.28 | |
2015 | | $ | 18.23 | | $ | 13.71 | |
2016 | | $ | 20.71 | | $ | 13.58 | |
2017 | | $ | 18.56 | | $ | 15.22 | |
2018 | | $ | 17.52 | | $ | 14.13 | |
2019 | | $ | 19.31 | | $ | 14.38 | |
2020 | | $ | 28.89 | | $ | 12.01 | |
2021 | | $ | 29.59 | | $ | 21.53 | |
2022* | | $ | 26.18 | | $ | 22.24 | |
* | Through March 21, 2022. |
*Through February 26, 2019.
Gold Market
Gold has two main categories of use: fabrication and investment. Fabricated gold has a variety of end uses, including jewelry, electronics, dentistry, industrial and decorative uses, medals, medallions and official coins. Gold investors buy gold bullion, official coins and jewelry. The supply of gold consists of a combination of production from mining and the draw-down of existing stocks of gold held by governments, financial institutions, industrial organizations and private individuals.
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated on the London Fix PM high and low gold fixes in U.S. dollars per troy ounce. On February 26, 2019,March 21, 2021, the closing price of gold was $1,325$1,935 per troy ounce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gold |
| ||||
Year |
| High |
| Low |
| ||
2011 |
| $ | 1,895 |
| $ | 1,319 |
|
2012 |
| $ | 1,792 |
| $ | 1,540 |
|
2013 |
| $ | 1,694 |
| $ | 1,192 |
|
2014 |
| $ | 1,385 |
| $ | 1,142 |
|
2015 |
| $ | 1,296 |
| $ | 1,049 |
|
2016 |
| $ | 1,366 |
| $ | 1,077 |
|
2017 |
| $ | 1,346 |
| $ | 1,151 |
|
2018 |
| $ | 1,355 |
| $ | 1,178 |
|
2019* |
| $ | 1,344 |
| $ | 1,280 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Gold |
| ||||
Year |
| High |
| Low |
| ||
2012 | | $ | 1,792 | | $ | 1,540 | |
2013 | | $ | 1,694 | | $ | 1,192 | |
2014 | | $ | 1,385 | | $ | 1,142 | |
2015 | | $ | 1,296 | | $ | 1,049 | |
2016 | | $ | 1,366 | | $ | 1,077 | |
2017 | | $ | 1,346 | | $ | 1,151 | |
2018 | | $ | 1,355 | | $ | 1,178 | |
2019 | | $ | 1,546 | | $ | 1,270 | |
2020 | | $ | 1,672 | | $ | 1,527 | |
2021 | | $ | 1,957 | | $ | 1,685 | |
2022* | | $ | 2,039 | | $ | 1,788 | |
* Through February 26, 2019.March 21, 2022.
2943
Employees
Employees
We currently have 178248 employees, including seven9 in Golden,the United States, approximately 164225 in Torreón, Mexico, or atprimarily involved with the Velardeña Properties (including approximately 90 assigned to the oxide plant which is leased to a third party), sixRodeo operation, and 14 in Argentina, primarily in connection with the El Quevar project, and one in Peru.project.
Competition
There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the acquisition of a limited number of mineral resource opportunities, and many of the mining companies with which we compete have greater financial and technical resources than we do. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to spend greater amounts on acquisitions of mineral properties of merit, as well as on exploration and advancement of their mineral properties. We also compete with other mining companies for the acquisition and retention of skilled mining engineers, mine and processing plant operators and mechanics, geologists, geophysicists and other experienced technical personnel. Our competitive position depends upon our ability to successfully and economically advance new and existing silver and gold properties. Failure to achieve and maintain a competitive position could adversely impact our ability to obtain the financing necessary for us to advance our mineral properties.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge through our website at www.goldenminerals.com,, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website is not incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K and is not a part of this report. Additionally, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
Investors in Golden Minerals should consider carefully, in addition to the other information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors:
Risk Factors related to our Financial Circumstances
We are an exploration stage company and do not have historically incurred operating losses and operating cash flow deficits and we expect to incur operating losses and operating cash flow deficits through 2019; our potential profitability in the foreseeable future would depend on our ability to identify, acquire and mine properties to generate sufficient revenues to fund our continuing activities.a long-term source of revenue.
We have a history of operating losseslosses. Although our Rodeo project generated revenue and free cash flow commencing in 2021, that project is short-lived and is not expected to generate significant cash flow beyond 2023. We are evaluating other potential mining activities, including a potential restart of mineral extraction at the Velardeña Properties. However, we expect thatdo not currently have any mining activities scheduled to commence after the termination of mining at the Rodeo Property. If we are unable to generate revenue from another mining property, we will continuebe dependent on future external financing to incur operating losses unlessfund our corporate expenses and untilexploration activities. There is no assurance that such financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all. See “Risk Factors – We may not have access to sufficient future capital.”
Our results of operations, cash flows and the value of our properties are highly dependent on the market prices of gold and silver and certain base metals, and these prices can be volatile.
The profitability of our mining operations and the value of our mining properties are directly related to the market price of gold, silver, and certain base metals. The price of gold and silver may also have a significant influence on the market price of our common stock. The market prices of these metals historically have fluctuated significantly and are
44
affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including (i) global or regional consumption patterns; (ii) supply of and demand for silver and gold on a worldwide basis; (iii) speculative and hedging activities; (iv) expectations for inflation; (v) political and economic conditions; (vi) supply of, and demand for, consumables required for extraction and processing of metals, and (vii) general economic conditions worldwide.
In the event metal prices decline or remain low for prolonged periods of time, as our Velardeña Properties, our El Quevar project, or another ofwe might be unable to develop our exploration properties, generates sufficient revenuewhich may adversely affect our results of operations, financial performance, and cash flows. An asset impairment charge may result from the occurrence of unexpected adverse events that impact our estimates of expected cash flows generated from our Rodeo mine or the market value of our non-producing properties, including a material diminution in the price of metals.
We may not continue to fundbe profitable.
Profitability at our continuing business activities. Although we have leased the oxide plantRodeo mine is subject to uncertainty. See “Risk Factors –The assumptions behind our estimates of cash flow and profitability at the Velardeña PropertiesRodeo mine are inherently subject to a subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company,uncertainty.”Unexpected interruptions in our mining business may cause us to incur losses, or the cashrevenue that we expect will be generatedgenerate from that lease willextraction may not be sufficient to fund allcontinuing operations including exploration and development costs. Our failure to generate future profits may adversely affect the price of our continuing business activities as currently conducted. In addition, the oxide plant leasecommon stock and stockholders may terminate soonerlose all or produce less revenue than we anticipate. Therepart of their investment. Metal prices have a significant impact on our profit margin and there is no assurance that we will develop additional sourcesbe profitable in the future. See “Risk Factors – Our results of revenue.
In addition,operations, cash flows and the potential profitability of mining and processing at anyvalue of our properties wouldare highly dependent on the market prices of gold and silver and certain base metals, and these prices can be based on a number of assumptions. For example, profitability would depend on metal prices, costs of materials and supplies, costs atvolatile.”
We may not have access to sufficient future capital.
Although the mines and processing plants and the amounts and timing of expenditures, including expenditures to maintain our
30
Velardeña Properties, our El Quevar project and to continue exploration at other exploration properties, and potential strategic acquisitions or other transactions, in addition to other factors, many of which are and will be beyond our control. We cannot be certain we will be ableRodeo Property is expected to generate sufficient revenue from any source to achieve profitability and eliminate operatingfree cash flow deficits, orthrough much of 2023, we expect to cease to require additional funding.
We will require additional external financing to fund our continuing business activities in the future.
Asactivities. We may be required to expend significant funds to determine if mineral reserves exist at any of December 31, 2018 we had approximately $3.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. With anticipated costs during 2019, including exploration expenditures, care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties,our other properties, continue exploration, and evaluation expendituresif warranted, develop our existing properties and identify and acquire additional properties to diversify our property holding costs at the El Quevar project, and general and administrative expenses, offset by anticipated revenue from the lease of the oxide plant of $4.6 million, we expect our current cash and cash equivalent balance will be approximately zero by the end of 2019, unless we are successful in raising additional capital or selling certain exploration assets. Even with these anticipated revenues throughout 2019, our cash balance in 2019 will not be sufficient to provide adequate cash reserves in the event of an unexpected termination of the Hecla lease, variations from anticipated care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties and costs for continued exploration, project assessment and development at our other exploration properties, requiring us to seek additional funding from equity or debt or from monetization of non-core assets.portfolio.
We do not have a credit, off-take or other commercial financing arrangement in place that would finance our general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities in the future, and we believe that securing credit for these purposes maywould be difficult given our limited history and the continuing volatility in global credit and commodity markets.challenging. In addition, commercial financing arrangements may not be available on favorable terms or on terms that would not further restrict our flexibility and ongoing ability to meet our cash requirements over a reasonable period of time. Access to public financing has been negatively impacted by the volatility in the credit markets and metals prices, which may affect our ability to obtain equity or debt financing in the future and, if obtained, to do so on favorable terms.
We also may not be able to obtain funding by monetizing additional non-core exploration or other assets at an acceptable price. Although we may be able to access public equity markets, including through issuances under our At the Market Offering Program with H.C. Wainwright & Co. (“ATM Program”), significant equity issuances may be dilutive to our existing stockholders.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain financing to fund our general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities in the future on favorable terms or at all. Failure to obtain financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further mining operations or exploration and construction and the possible partial or total loss of our interest in our properties.
Although we may be able
Risks Related to access public equity markets, including through issuances under our At-the-Market program we entered intoOperations
Increased operating and capital costs could adversely affect our results of operations.
45
Operating costs at our Rodeo mine are subject to fluctuation due to a number of factors, such as variable ore grade, changing metallurgy and revisions to mine plans in December 2016 (the “ATM Program”) orresponse to the committed equity program with Lincoln Park Capital that we entered into in May 2018 (the “LPC Program”), significant issuances under those programs may be heavily dilutive to existing shareholders.
Hecla may terminate the oxide plant lease.
In July 2015 we entered into a leasing agreement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company to lease our Velardeña oxide plant for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. The lease agreement contained several lease extension options, which Hecla exercised, extending the current lease term through December 31, 2020. Hecla is responsible for ongoing operationphysical shape and maintenancelocation of the oxide plantore body, as well as the age and duringutilization rates for the year ended December 31, 2018, Hecla'smining and processing-related facilities and equipment. In addition, costs are affected by the price and availability of input commodities, such as fuel, electricity, labor, chemical reagents, explosives, steel, concrete and mining and processing activities resultedrelated equipment and facilities. Commodity costs are, at times, subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make mineral extraction less profitable. Further, changes in laws and regulations can affect commodity prices, uses and transport. Reported costs may also be affected by changes in accounting standards. A material increase in costs could have a net marginsignificant effect on our results of $4.9 million for us. The leaseoperations and operating cash flow.
We could have significant increases in capital and operating costs over the next several years in connection with the development of new projects in challenging jurisdictions and in the sustaining and/or expansion of existing mining and processing operations. Costs associated with capital expenditures may terminate sooner thanincrease in the endfuture as a result of 2020 if Hecla experiences mining problemsfactors beyond our control, such as inflation or delays at its nearby mine, if there are disputes between Hecla and us,due to supply chain constraints or for other reasons. Hecla has the right to terminate the lease on 120 days’ notice. Moreover, the lease payment from Hecla is based, in part,delays. Increased capital expenditures may have an adverse effect on the amountresults of ore processedoperations and cash flow generated from existing operations, as well as the economic returns anticipated from new projects, or may make the development of future projects uneconomic.
The assumptions behind our estimates of cash flow and profitability at the plant, andRodeo mine are inherently subject to uncertainty.
We have not established mineral reserves as defined under S-K 1300 at the Rodeo mine. As a result, despite the fact that we have no control over their production.
31
One of our stockholders owns a significant percentage of our common stockaverage cash operating costs are based upon, among other things, (i) anticipated tonnage, grades and could block decisions or transactions that could be beneficial to other stockholders.
One of our stockholders, Sentient, owns approximately 44%metallurgical characteristics of the Company's outstanding common stock. With this levelore to be mined and processed; (ii) anticipated recovery rates of ownership, Sentient could exert significant control over us, including over the election of directors, changes in the size or the composition of the board of directors, and mergerssilver and other business combinations involvingmetals from the Company. Through greater controlore; (iii) cash operating costs of the board of directorscomparable facilities and increased voting power, including the potentialequipment; and (iv) anticipated climatic conditions. Actual cash operating costs, production and economic returns may differ significantly from those anticipated by our studies and estimates.
We are party to prevent a quorum at stockholders meetings, Sentient could control certain decisions, including decisions regarding qualification and appointment of officers, operations of the business including acquisition or disposition of our assets or purchases and sales of mining or exploration properties, dividend policy, and access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of equity or debt securities). Sentient’s large share ownership will also make it difficult, if not impossible, for us to enter into a change of control transaction that may otherwise be beneficial for our other shareholders.
If we commence mining in Mexico, we will likely enter into a collective bargaining agreement with a union in Mexico that, together with labor and employment regulations, could adversely affect our mining activities and financial condition.
As is the case at our Velardeña Properties, mineMine employees in Mexico are typically represented by a union, and our relationship with our employees is, and we expect in the future will be, governed in part by collective bargaining agreements. Any collective bargaining agreement that we enter into with a union is likely to restrict our mining flexibility in and impose additional costs on our mining activities. In addition, relations between us and our employees in Mexico may be affected by changes in regulations or labor union requirements regarding labor relations that may be introduced by the Mexican authorities or by labor unions. Changes in legislation or in the relationship between us and our employees may have a material adverse effect on our mining activities and financial condition.
Competition in the mining industry is intense, and we have limited financial and personnel resources with which to compete.
Competition in the mining industry for desirable properties, investment capital and human capital is intense. Numerous companies headquartered in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere throughout the world compete for properties and human capital on a global basis. We may notare a small participant in the mining industry due to our limited financial and human capital resources. We presently operate with a limited number of people and we anticipate operating in the same manner going forward. We compete with other companies in our industry to hire qualified employees and consultants when needed to successfully operate the Rodeo mine, the Veolardeña Properties again.
In mid-November 2015, we shut down the mines and sulfide processing plant at our Velardeña Properties and placed them on care and maintenance. Commencing mining again is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Based on these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that we will restart mining activities at the Velardeña Properties.
Our abilityprocessing facility, and to successfully conduct mining and processing activities resulting in long-term cash flow and profitability will be affected by changes in prices of silver, gold and other metals.
Our ability to successfully conduct mining and processing activities in Mexico, Argentina or other countries, to establish reserves and advance our exploration
46
properties. We may be unable to attract the necessary human capital to fully explore, and if warranted, develop our properties and be unable to become profitable in the future,acquire other desirable properties. We believe that competition for acquiring mineral properties, as well as our long-term viability, depend, in large part, on the market prices of silver, gold, zinc, coppercompetition to attract and other metals. The market prices for these metals are volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The declines in silver and gold prices in recent years have had a significant impact on our mining activities, resulting in a shutdown of mining at our Velardeña Properties in 2015, and negatively affect mining opportunities at our other properties. Additionally, future weaknessretain qualified human capital, will continue to be intense in the global economy could increase volatility in metals prices or depress metals prices, which could also affect our mining and processing plans at our Velardeña Properties or make it uneconomic for us to engage in mining or exploration activities. Volatility or sustained price declines may also adversely affect our ability to build or continue our business.future.
If products are
Products processed from our Velardeña PropertiesRodeo project or other mines in the future they could contain higher than expected contaminants, thereby negatively impacting our financial condition.
In 2015 we processed mined material to make gold and silver bearing lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. Concentrate treatmentTreatment charges paid to smelters and refineries include penalties for certain elements, including arsenic and antimony that exceed contract limits. InIf the future, if we process material mined from our Velardeña Properties or other mines, any such concentrates could includeRodeo project includes higher than expected contaminants, whichthis would result in higher treatment expenses and penalty charges that could increase our costs and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. This could occur due to unexpected variations in the occurrence of these elements in the material mined, problems that occur during blending of material from various locations in the mine prior to processing and other unanticipated events.
Conditions of our mining and processing activities are dependent on the availability of sufficient water supplies to support our mining activities.
Water is critical to our business, and the increasing pressure on water resources requires us to consider both current and future conditions in our management approach. Across the globe, water is a shared and regulated resource. Mining operations require significant quantities of water for mining, ore processing and related support facilities. Our properties in Mexico and Argentina are in areas where water is scarce and competition among users for continuing access to water is significant. Continuous production and mine development are dependent on our ability to acquire and maintain water rights and claims and to defeat claims adverse to current water uses in legal proceedings. Although we believe that our operations currently have sufficient water rights and claims to cover operating demands, we cannot predict the potential outcome of future legal proceedings relating to water rights, claims and uses. Water shortages may also result from weather or environmental and climate impacts out of our control. Shortages in water supply could result in production and processing interruptions. In addition, the scarcity of water in certain regions could result in increased costs to obtain sufficient quantities of water to conduct our operations. The El Quevar project,loss of some or all water rights, in whole or in part, or ongoing shortages of water to which we have rights or significantly higher costs to obtain sufficient quantities of water (or the Velardeña Properties,failure to procure sufficient quantities of water) could result in our inability to maintain mineral extraction at current or expected levels, require us to curtail or shut down mining operations and our other properties may not contain mineral reserves.
We are considered an exploration stage company under SEC Industry Guide 7, and none of the properties at the El Quevar project, our Velardeña Properties,prevent us from pursuing expansion or any ofdevelopment opportunities. Laws and regulations may be introduced in some jurisdictions in which we operate which could also limit access to sufficient water resources, thus adversely affecting our other properties have been shown to contain proven or probable mineral reserves. Expenditures made in miningoperations.
Processing activities at the Velardeña Properties require significant amounts of water. At the Velardeña Properties, our ability to have sufficient water is dependent on our ability to maintain our water rights and claims. Water is provided for all of the mines comprising our Velardeña Properties by wells located in the valley adjacent to the Velardeña Properties. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are currently using water from the three wells associated with the oxide plant and from two of the three wells associated with the sulfide plant. We are required to make annual payments to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to these wells. We are required to pay a fine to the Mexican Government each year if we use too much water from a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well. In addition to these fines, the explorationMexican Government reserves the right to cancel our title to the wells for abuse of these rules.
We believe we currently have a sufficient amount of water for our expected processing activities at the plant. However, if we began processing material through both the sulfide and advancementoxide plants in the future, we may face shortages in our water supply, and therefore will need to obtain water from outside sources at higher costs. The loss of some or all water rights for any of our El Quevar project or other properties may not resultwells, in positive cash flowwhole or in discoveriespart, or shortages of commercially recoverable quantitieswater to which we have rights would require us to seek water from outside sources at higher costs and could require us to curtail or shut down mining and processing in the
47
future. Laws and regulations may be introduced in the future which could limit our access to sufficient water resources in mining activities, thus adversely affecting our business.
The nature of ore. Mostmineral exploration, projectsmining, and processing activities involves significant hazards, a high degree of risk, and the possibility of uninsured losses.
Exploration for and the production of minerals is highly speculative and involves greater risk than many other businesses. Many exploration programs do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable ore deposits,mineralization, and any mineralization discovered may not be of sufficient quantity or quality to be profitably mined. While we are not currently conducting mining operations at the Velardeña Properties, we are evaluating a potential restart of mineral extraction. Because the Velardeña mines are underground, potential mining activities, as well as the conduct of our exploration programs that frequently require rehabilitation of and drilling in underground mine workings, are subject to numerous risks and hazards inherent in underground mines. Our operations are, and any future mining operations or construction we may conduct will be, subject to all of the operating hazards and risks normally incident to exploring for and mining of mineral properties, such as, but not limited to:
| ● | Fluctuation in production costs that make mining uneconomic; |
| ● | Labor disputes; |
| ● | Unanticipated variations in grade and other geologic problems; |
| ● | Environmental hazards, noxious fumes and gases; |
| ● | Water conditions; |
| ● | Difficult surface or underground conditions; |
| ● | Industrial accidents; |
| ● | Metallurgical and other processing problems; |
| ● | Mechanical and equipment performance problems; |
| ● | Failure of pit walls, dams, declines, drifts and shafts; |
| ● | Unusual or unexpected rock formations; |
| ● | Personal injury, fire, flooding, cave-ins, seismic activity and landslides; and |
| ● | Decrease in the value of mineralized material due to lower gold, silver and metal prices. |
These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or processing facilities, equipment, personal injury or death, environmental damage, reduced extraction and processing and delays in mining, asset write-downs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although we maintain insurance against risks inherent in the conducting of our business in amounts that we consider reasonable, this insurance contains exclusions and limitations on coverage, and will not cover all potential risks associated with mining and exploration activities, and related liabilities might exceed policy limits. As a result of any or all of the forgoing, we could incur significant liabilities and costs that may exceed the limits of our insurance coverage or that we may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We may also not be insured against all interruptions to our operations. Losses from these or other events may cause us to incur significant costs which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to fund activities on our properties. A significant loss could force us to reduce or suspend our operations and development.
Risks related to our Exploration Activities
48
Our properties are in the exploration stage.
Our exploration properties may not contain mineral reserves.
We have not established that our properties contain any mineral reserve, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to do so. A mineral reserve is defined by the SEC in Regulation S-K 1300 as that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The probability of an individual prospect ever having a “reserve” that meets the requirements of Regulation S-K 1300 is extremely remote; in all probability our mineral properties do not contain any “reserves” and any funds that we spend on exploration could be lost. Even if we do eventually discover mineral reserves on our properties, there can be no assurance that they can be developed into producing mines and we cannot assure you that anycan extract those minerals. Both mineral deposit we identify will qualify as an orebody that can be legallyexploration and economically exploited or that any particular leveldevelopment involve a high degree of recovery from discovered mineralization will in fact be realized.risk and few mineral properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.
Our mineral resource estimates are inherently imprecise.
33
During 2012, we released an estimate of mineralized materialmineral resources at our El Quevarthe Rodeo project and in 2018 Wood Group completed an analysis and re-modeling of the data utilized in the prior mineralized material estimate. Tetra Tech completed technical reports on our Velardeña Properties and our Santa Maria and Rodeo properties, which indicated the presence of mineralized material. Mineralized materialProperties. Mineral resource figures based on estimates made by geologists are inherently imprecise and depend on geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling that may prove to be unreliable or inaccurate. We cannot assure you that these estimates are accurate, and even if the estimates are accurate, the economic viability of the Velardeña project may not justify exploitation, or thatin the case of Rodeo mine, the estimates may not accurately reflect the future revenue we receive from mineral extraction.
The exploration of our mineral properties is highly speculative in nature, involves substantial expenditures and is frequently non-productive.
Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature and frequently results in no or very little return on amounts invested to evaluate a particular property. Substantial expenditures are required to (i) establish the existence of a potential ore body through drilling and metallurgical and other testing techniques; (ii) determine metal content and metallurgical recovery processes to process metal from the ore; (iii) determine the feasibility of mine development and mineral extraction; and (iv) construct, renovate or expand mining and processing facilities. If we discover a deposit or ore at a property, it usually takes several years from the initial phases of exploration until mineral extraction is possible, if at all. During this time, the economic feasibility of a project may change because of increased costs, lower metal prices or other factors. As a result of these uncertainties, our exploration programs may not result in the identification of proven and probable mineral reserves in sufficient quantities to justify developing a particular property.
We may acquire additional mining properties and our business may be negatively impacted if reserves are not located on acquired properties or if we are unable to successfully execute and/or integrate the acquisitions.
We have in the past, and may in the future, acquire additional mining properties. There can be no assurance that reserves will be identified aton any properties that we acquire. We may experience negative reactions from the El Quevar project,financial markets if we complete acquisitions of additional properties and reserves are not located on acquired properties. There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete any acquisitions successfully, or that any acquisition will achieve anticipated synergies or other positive results. Any material problems that we encounter in connection with such an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position. These factors may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock
We may not mine the Velardeña Properties again.
In mid-November 2015, we shut down the Santa Mariamines and Rodeosulfide processing plant at our Velardeña Properties and placed them on care and maintenance. Commencing mining again is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including: whether we are able to create a mine plan or gold recovery improvements that can achieve sustainable cash positive results
49
at current and future metals prices; unexpected events, including difficulties in maintaining the properties on a care and maintenance basis, potential sabotage or anydamage to the assets related to the suspension of mining, and variations in ore grade and relative amounts, grades and metallurgical characteristics of oxide and sulfide ores; whether gold and silver prices will achieve or remain at sufficiently high levels to permit us to achieve sustainable cash positive results; whether actual holding and care and maintenance costs exceed current estimates or whether unanticipated costs arise; whether we are able to retain sufficient numbers of skilled mining and management personnel and otherwise maintain satisfactory relations with the unionized workforce on site; and our ability to obtain additional funding for general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities as currently conducted and possibly for a potential restart of our other properties. Even ifVelardeña Properties. Based on these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that we will restart mining activities at the presenceVelardeña Properties.
Regulatory Risks
Our operations are subject to ongoing permitting requirements which could result in the delay, suspension or termination of reserves is established at a project, the economic viability of the project may not justify exploitation. We have spent significant amounts on the evaluation of El Quevar prior to establishing the economic viability of that project.our operations.
Estimates of reserves, mineral deposits
Our operations, including our ongoing exploration drilling programs and mining, costs also can be affected by factors such asrequire ongoing permits from governmental regulations and requirements, fluctuations in metals prices or costs of essential materials or supplies, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties and unusual or unexpected geological formations. In addition, the grades of ore or material ultimately mined may differ from that indicated by drilling results, sampling, feasibility studies or technical reports. Short-term factors relating to reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies or the processing of new or different grades, may also have an adverse effect onlocal authorities. Future mining and oncurrent processing at our Rodeo and Velardeña properties and the resultscontinued evaluation of operations. Silver, gold or other minerals recovered in small-scale laboratory tests may not be duplicated in large-scale tests under on-site processing conditions.
The Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar project and other exploration activities will require additional permits from various governmental authorities. We may also be required to obtain certain property rights to access or use our properties. Obtaining or renewing licenses and permits, and acquiring property rights, can be complex and time-consuming processes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire all required licenses, permits or property rights on reasonable terms or in a timely manner, or at all, and that such terms will not be adversely changed, that required extensions will be granted, or that the issuance of such licenses, permits or property rights will not be challenged by third parties. If we cannot obtain or maintain the necessary permits or if there is a delay in receiving future permits, our timetable and business plan will be adversely affected and may prevent or make future mining and processing at our Rodeo or Velardeña properties and other continued processing activities economically unfeasible.
Our exploration activities are in countries with developing economies and are subject to the risks of political and economic instability associated with these countries.
We currently conduct exploration activities almost exclusively in countries with developing economies, including Argentina and Mexico. These countries and other emerging markets in which we may conduct business have from time to time experienced economic or political instability. We may be materially adversely affected by risks associated with conducting exploration activities in countries with developing economies, including:
properties, mines and mining activities, and inconsistent or arbitrary application of such legal
requirements;
or Argentina;
50
Changes in mining or investment policies or shifts in the prevailing political climate in any of the countries in which we conduct exploration activities could adversely affect our business.
Our El Quevar exploration property is located in Argentina and is subject to various levels of political, economic, legal, social and other risks.
Our El Quevar exploration property is located in Argentina and, as such, is exposed to various levels of political, economic, legal, social and other risks and uncertainties, including high interest rates; abrupt changes in currency values; high levels of inflation; stability and competitiveness of the Argentine peso against foreign currencies; wage and price controls; regulations to import equipment and other necessities relevant for operations; changes in governmental economic (including export duties and import regulations) or tax policies; and political and social tensions.
The Argentine economy has experienced significant volatility in recent decades, characterized by periods of low or negative gross domestic product growth, high and variable levels of inflation and currency depreciation and devaluation. Financial and securities markets in Argentina, and the Argentine economy, are influenced by economic and market conditions in other markets worldwide. The Argentine government has often changed monetary, taxation, credit, tariff and other policies to influence the course of Argentina’s economy, and taken other actions which do, or may be perceived to weaken the nation’s economy especially as it relates to foreign investors and the overall investment climate.
The Argentine government has not only historically exercised significant influence over the country’s economy, but the country’s legal and regulatory frameworks have at times suffered radical changes due to political influence and significant political uncertainties as well. For example, in April 2014, there were nationwide strikes that paralyzed the Argentine economy, shutting down air, train and bus traffic, closing businesses and ports, emptying classrooms, shutting down non-emergency hospital attention and leaving trash uncollected. This is consistent with past periods of significant economic unrest and social and political turmoil. Future government policies to preempt, or in response to, social unrest may include expropriation, nationalization, forced renegotiation or modification of existing contracts, suspension of the enforcement of creditors’ rights, new taxation policies, including royalty and tax increases and retroactive tax claims, and changes in laws and policies affecting foreign trade and investment. Such policies could destabilize the country and adversely and materially affect the economy, and thereby our business.
Most of our properties are subject to foreignextensive environmental laws and regulations which could materially adversely affect our business.
We have conducted
Our exploration, mining, activities in Mexico and conduct mineral exploration activities primarily in Mexico. Mexico and Argentina, where the El Quevar project is located, haveprocessing operations are subject to extensive laws and regulations thatgoverning land use and the protection of the environment which control the exploration and mining of mineral properties and their effects on the environment, including air and water quality, mine reclamation, waste generation, handling and disposal, the protection of different species of flora and fauna and the preservation of lands. These laws and regulations require us to acquire permits and other authorizations for conducting certain activities. In many countries, there is relatively new comprehensive environmental legislation, and the permitting and the authorization processprocesses may not be established or predictable. We may not be able to acquire necessary permits or authorizations on a timely basis, if at all. Delays in acquiring any permit or authorization could increase the cost of our projects and could suspend or delay the commencement of extraction and processing of mineralized material.
Our Rodeo and Velardeña Propertiesproperties are subject to regulation by SEMARNAT, the environmental protection agency of Mexico. In order to permit new facilities at or expand existing facilities, regulations require that an environmental impact statement, known in Mexico as a Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental (the “Manifestación”), be prepared by a third-party contractor for submission to SEMARNAT. Studies required to support the Manifestación include a detailed analysis of soil, water, vegetation, wildlife, cultural resources and socio-economic impacts. The Manifestación is then
51
published on SEMARNAT’s web page and in its official gazette in a national and local newspaper. The Manifestación is discussed at various open hearings, including hearings in the local communities, at which third parties may voice their views. We would be required to provide proof of local community support of the Manifestación as a condition to final approval. We may not be able to obtain community support of future projects.
Environmental legislation in Mexico and in many other countries is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. For example, in January 2011, Article 180 of the Mexican Federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection was amended. Among other things, this amendment extended the term during which an individual or entity having a legitimate interest may contest administrative acts, including environmental authorizations, permits or concessions granted, without the need to demonstrate the actual existence of harm to the environment, natural resources, flora, fauna or human health, making it sufficient to argue that harm may be caused. Further, the amendment permits the contesting party to
34
challenge a Manifestación through a variety of administrative or court procedures. As a result of the amendment, more legal actions supported or sponsored by non-governmental groups interested in halting projects may be filed against companies operating in all industrial sectors, including the mining sector. Mexican operations are also subject to the environmental agreements entered into by Mexico, the United States and Canada in connection with the North American Free Trade Agreement. Further, in August 2011, certain amendments to the Civil Federal Procedures Code of Mexico (“CFPC”) were published in the Official Daily of the Federation. The amendments establish three categories of collective actions by which 30 or more people claiming injury resulting from, among other things, environmental harm, will be deemed to have a sufficient and legitimate interest in seeking, through a civil procedure, restitution, economic compensation or suspension of the activities from which the alleged injury derived. These amendments to the CFPC may result in more litigation by plaintiffs seeking remedies for alleged environmental harms, including suspension of the activities alleged to cause harm. Future changes in environmental regulation in the jurisdictions where the Velardeña Properties are located may adversely affect our business, make our business prohibitively expensive, or prohibit it altogether.
Environmental legislation in many other countries, in addition to Mexico, is evolving in a manner that will likely require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Future changes in environmental regulation in the jurisdictions where our Rodeo and Velardeña properties are located may adversely affect our business, make our business prohibitively expensive, or prohibit it altogether. We cannot predict what environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted or adopted in the future or how future laws and regulations will be administered or interpreted. For example, in September 2010, the Argentine National Congress passed legislation which prohibits mining activity in glacial and surrounding areas. Although we do not currently anticipate that this legislation will impact the El Quevar project, the legislation provides an example of the evolving environmental legislation in the areas in which we operate. Compliance with more stringent laws and regulations, as well as potentially more vigorous enforcement policies or regulatory agencies or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may (i) necessitate significant capital outlays, (ii) cause us to delay, terminate or otherwise change our intended activities with respect to one or more projects, or (iii) materially adversely affect our future exploration activities.
Many of our properties are located in areas of prior mining activity and we may encounter legacy environmental damage.
The Velardeña Properties and many of our exploration properties are located in historic mining districts where prior owners, including ECU in the case of the Velardeña Properties, may have caused environmental damage that may not be known to us or to theapplicable regulators. At the Velardeña Properties and in most other cases, we have not sought completeconducted comprehensive environmental analyses of our mineral properties. We have not conducted comprehensive reviews of the environmental laws and regulations in every jurisdiction in which we own or control mineral properties. Insurance fully covering many environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and mining) is not generally available. To the extent environmental hazards may exist on the properties in which we currently hold interests, or may hold interests in the future, that are unknown to us at present and that have been caused by us, or previous owners or operators, or that may have occurred naturally, and to the extent we are subject to environmental requirements or liabilities, the cost of compliance with these requirements and satisfaction of these liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If we are unable to fully fund the cost of remediation of any environmental condition, we may be required to suspend activities or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remediation.
In addition,
Climate change and climate change legislation or regulations could impact our business.
We are subject to physical risks associated with climate change which could seriously harm our results of operations and increase our costs and expenses. The occurrence of severe adverse weather conditions, including increased temperatures and droughts, fires, longer wet or dry seasons, increased precipitation, floods, hail, snow, or more severe storms, may have a potentially devastating impact on our operations. Adverse weather may result in physical damage to our operations, instability of our infrastructure and equipment, washed-out roads to our projects, and alter the supply of water and electricity to our properties, mining sites, and oxide plant. Increased temperatures may also decrease worker productivity at our projects and raise cooling costs. Should the impacts of climate change be material in nature or occur for lengthy periods of time in the areas in which we operate, our financial condition or results of operations would be adversely affected.
Changes in the quantity of water, whether in excess or deficient amounts, may impact exploration and development activities, mining and processing operations, water storage and treatment facilities, tailings storage facilities, closure and reclamation efforts, and may increase levels of dust in dry conditions and land erosion and slope stability in case of prolonged wet conditions. Increased precipitation, extreme rainfall events or increased snowfall may potentially impact tailings storage facilities through flooding of the water management infrastructure, exceeding surface water runoff network capacity, overtopping the facility, or undermining the slope stability of the structure. Increased amounts of water may also result in extended periods of mine pit flooding, maintenance and storage facilities; or may exceed current water
52
treatment facility capacity to store and treat water physical conditions resulting in an unintended overflow either on or off of the mine site property.
U.S. orand international legislative orand regulatory action intended to address concerns about climate changeensure the protection of the environment are constantly changing and greenhouse gas emissions could negatively impactevolving in a manner expected to result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and liability, and potentially increased capital expenditures and operating costs. Transitioning our business.business to meet regulatory, societal and investor expectations may cause us to incur lower economic returns than originally estimated for new exploration projects and development plans of existing operations.
Title to the Rodeo project, Velardeña Properties and our other properties and rights may be defective or may be challenged.
Our policy is to seek to confirm the validity of our rights to, title to, or contract rights with respect to, each mineral property in which we have a material interest. However, we cannot guarantee that title to our properties will not be challenged. Title insurance is not available for our mineral properties, and our ability to ensure that we have obtained secure rights to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. Accordingly, the Rodeo project, Velardeña Properties and our other mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims,
35
and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. In addition, we may be unable to conduct activities on our properties as permitted or to enforce our rights with respect to our properties, and the title to our mineral properties may also be impacted by state action. We have not conducted surveys of all of the exploration properties in which we hold direct or indirect interests and, therefore, the precise area and location of these exploration properties may be in doubt.
In most of the countries in which we operate, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements, or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners. Any such loss, reduction or imposition of partners could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Under the laws of Mexico, mineral resources belong to the state, and government concessions are required to explore for or exploit mineral reserves. Mineral rights derive from concessions granted, on a discretionary basis, by the Ministry of Economy, pursuant to the Mexican mining law and regulations thereunder. We hold title to the Rodeo project, Velardeña Properties and our other properties in Mexico through these government concessions, but there is no assurance that title to the concessions comprising the Rodeo project, Velardeña Properties and other properties will not be challenged or impaired. The Rodeo project, Velardeña Properties and other properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, interests or native land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects. There could be valid challenges to the title of any of the claims comprising the Rodeo project, Velardeña Properties that, if successful, could impair mining with respect to such properties in the future. A defect could result in our losing all or a portion of our right, title, and interest in and to the properties to which the title defect relates.
Our Rodeo project mining concessions, Velardeña Properties mining concessions and our other mining concessions in Mexico may be terminated if our obligations to maintain the concessions in good standing are not satisfied, including obligations to explore or exploit the relevant concession, to pay any relevant fees, to comply with all environmental and safety standards, to provide information to the Ministry of Economy and to allow inspections by the Ministry of Economy. In addition to termination, failure to make timely concession maintenance payments and otherwise comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in reduction or expropriation of entitlements. Additionally, in 2014, new mining concessions became subject to additional review and approval by the Mexico Ministry of Energy.Energy, and in recent years the federal government has been reluctant to issue new mining concessions at all.
Mining concessions in Mexico give exclusive exploration and exploitation rights to the minerals located in the concessions but do not include surface rights to the real property, which requires that we negotiate the necessary
53
agreements with surface landowners. Many of our mining properties are subject to the Mexican ejido system requiring us to contract with the local communities surrounding the properties in order to obtain surface rights to land needed in connection with our mining exploration activities. In connection with our Velardeña Properties, we have contracts with two ejidos to secure surface rights with a total annual cost of approximately $25,000. The first contract is a ten-year contract with the Velardeña ejido, which provides surface rights to certain roads and other infrastructure at the Velardeña Properties through 2021. The second contract is a 25-year contract with the Vista Hermosa ejido signed in March 2013, which provides exploration access and access rights for roads and utilities for our Velardeña Properties. Similar to our Velardeña Properties, the Rodeo project is subject to the Mexican ejido system. We believe, although we cannot be certain, that our agreement with the local ejidos to allow access to the property will be sufficient to conduct our proposed mining activities. We also have a separate surface rights agreement in place with a local private landowner that allows us to conduct mining operations on the two concessions that make up the Rodeo Property. Our inability to maintain and periodically renew or expand these surface rights on favorable terms or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Mining and processing activities are dependent on the availability
Most of sufficient water supplies to support our mining activities.
Miningproperties, including our Rodeo and processing at the Velardeña Properties, as at most mines, requires significant amounts of water. At the Velardeña Properties, our ability to have sufficient water is dependent on our ability to maintain our water rights and claims. Water is provided for all of the mines comprising our Velardeña Properties by wells located in the valley adjacent to the Velardeña Properties. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration
36
to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are currently using water from the three wells associated with the oxide plant and from two of the three wells associated with the sulfide plant. We are required to make annual payments to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to these wells. We are required to pay a fine to the Mexican Government each year if we use too much water from a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well. In addition to these fines, the Mexican Government reserves the right to cancel our title to the wells for abuse of these rules.
We currently have a sufficient amount of water for the third-party processing activities at the oxide plant. However, if we began processing material from both the sulfide and oxide plants in the future, we may face shortages in our water supply, and therefore will need to obtain water from outside sources at higher costs. The loss of some or all water rights for any of our wells, in whole or in part, or shortages of water to which we have rights would require us to seek water from outside sources at higher costs and could require us to curtail or shut down mining and processing in the future. Laws and regulations may be introduced in the future which could limit our access to sufficient water resources in mining activities, thus adversely affecting our business.
There are significant hazards involved in underground mining and processing activities at our Velardeña Properties, not all of which are fully covered by insurance. To the extent we must pay the costs associated with such risks, our business may be negatively affected.
The mining and processing of the underground mines at our Velardeña Properties, as well as the conduct of our exploration programs that frequently require rehabilitation of and drilling in underground mine workings, are subject to numerous risks and hazards, including, but not limited to, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, encountering unusual or unexpected geological formations, formation pressures, cave-ins, underground fires or floods, power outages, labor disruptions, seismic activity, rock bursts, accidents relating to historical workings, landslides and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions. These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or processing facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, reduced extraction and processing and delays in mining, asset write-downs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although we maintain insurance against risks inherent in the conduct of our business in amounts that we consider reasonable, this insurance contains, as in the case of our Velardeña Properties, exclusions and limitations on coverage, and will not cover all potential risks associated with mining and exploration activities, and related liabilities might exceed policy limits. As a result of any or all of the forgoing, particularly if the facilities are older, we could incur significant liabilities and costs that could adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition.
Our Velardeña Properties and most of our exploration properties, are located in Mexico and are subject to various levels of political, economic, legal, social and other risks.
Our Rodeo and Velardeña Propertiesproperties are located in Mexico, and, as such, are exposed to various levels of political, economic, legal and other risks and uncertainties, including local acts of violence, such as violence from drug cartels; military repression; extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates; high rates of inflation; labor unrest; the risks of war or civil unrest; expropriation and nationalization; renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts; illegal mining; acts of political corruption; changes in taxation policies; restrictions on foreign exchange and repatriation; and changing political conditions, (including potential instability if the United States withdraws from or renegotiates the North American Free Trade Agreement), currency controls and governmental regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Furthermore, given the uncertainties surrounding the policies of the new US Administration, the political relationship between the United States and Mexico may deteriorate, creating further political risk of doing business in Mexico.
37
In the past, Mexico has been subject to political instability, changes and uncertainties, which have resulted in changes to existing governmental regulations affecting mineral exploration and mining activities. Mexico’s status as a developing country may make it more difficult for us to obtain any required funding for our Rodeo project, Velardeña Properties or other projects in Mexico in the future.
Our Mexican properties are subject to a variety of governmental regulations governing health and worker safety, employment standards, waste disposal, protection of historic and archaeological sites, mine development, protection of endangered and protected species, purchase, storage and use of explosives and other matters. Specifically, our activities related to the Rodeo and Velardeña Propertiesproperties are subject to regulation by SEMARNAT, the Comisión Nacional del Agua, which regulates water rights, and Mexican mining laws. Mexican regulators have broad authority to shut down and levy fines against facilities that do not comply with regulations or standards.
Our Rodeo and Velardeña Propertiesproperties and mineral exploration activities in Mexico may be adversely affected in varying degrees by changing government regulations relating to the mining industry or shifts in political conditions that increase the costs related to our mining and exploration activities or the maintenance of our properties. For example, in January 2014, amendments to the Mexico federal corporate income tax law require titleholders of mining concessions to pay annually a 7.5% duty of their mining related profits and a 0.5% duty on revenues obtained from the sale of gold, silver and platinum that were effective March 2015. These additional duties applicable to Mexico mining concession titleholders will have a significant impact on the annual costs applicable to the Velardeña Properties if we have mining related profits or significant revenues in the future.
Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies, changes or increases in the legal rights of indigenous populations or in the difficulty or expense of obtaining rights from them that are necessary for our Rodeo or Velardeña Propertiesproperties or shifts in political attitude may adversely affect our business and financial condition. Our mining and exploration activities may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on extraction, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income and other taxes, expropriation of property, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Restart of mining or use of both the oxide and sulfide plant may also require us to assure the availability of adequate supplies of water and power, which could be affected by government policy and competing businesses in the area. The
54
occurrence of these various factors and uncertainties cannot be accurately predicted and could have an adverse effect on our mining and exploration activities and financial condition.
Future changes in applicable laws and regulations or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could negatively impact current or planned exploration or mining activities at our Rodeo or Velardeña Propertiesproperties or in respect of any of our other projects in Mexico or projects with which we become involved in Mexico. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, even if inadvertent, could result in the interruption of mining and exploration or material fines, penalties or other liabilities.
Our ability to develop our Mexican properties is subject to the rights of the Ejido (agrarian cooperatives) who use or own the surface for agricultural purposes.
Our ability to mine minerals is subject to maintaining satisfactory arrangements and relationships with the Ejido for access and surface disturbances. Ejidos are groups of local inhabitants who were granted rights to conduct agricultural activities on the property. We must negotiate and maintain a satisfactory arrangement with these residents in order to disturb or discontinue their rights to farm.
In connection with our Velardeña Properties, we have contracts with two ejidos to secure surface rights with a total annual cost of approximately $25,000.The first contract is a ten-year contract with the Velardeña ejido, which provides surface rights to certain roads and other infrastructure at the Velardeña Properties through 2021and is currently being renewed for an additional 10-year period. The second contract is a 25-year contract with the Vista Hermosa ejido signed in March 2013, which provides exploration access and access rights for roads and utilities for our Velardeña Properties. Similar to our Velardeña Properties, the Rodeo project is subject to the Mexican ejido system. We also have a separate surface rights agreement in place with a local private landowner that allows us to conduct mining operations on the two concessions that make up the Rodeo Property. Our inability to maintain and periodically renew or expand these surface rights on favorable terms or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Most of our costs are subject to exchange control policies, the effects of inflation, and currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso.
Our revenue and external funding are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. However, certain mining, processing, maintenance and exploration costs at the Rodeo and Velardeña Propertiesproperties and most of our exploration properties are denominated principally in Mexican pesos. These costs principally include electricity, labor, water, maintenance, local contractors and fuel. The appreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar increases expenses and the cost of purchasing capital assets in U.S. dollar terms in Mexico, which can adversely impact our operating results and cash flows. Conversely, depreciation of the Mexican peso decreases operating costs and capital asset purchases in U.S. dollar terms. When inflation in Mexico increases without a corresponding devaluation of the Mexican peso, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. The annual average inflation rate in Mexico was 4.8%approximately 7.3% in 2018, 6.0 %2021, 3.2% in 20172020, and 2.8%3.6% in 2016.2019. At the same time, the peso has been subject to significant fluctuation, which may not have been proportionate to the inflation rate and may not be proportionate to the inflation rate in the future. The value of the peso decreased by 2.6% in 2021, decreased by 4.7% in 2018,2020, and increased by 5.0%3.6% in 2017, and decreased by 19% in 2016.2019. In addition, fluctuations
38
in currency exchange rates may have a significant impact on our financial results. There can be no assurance that the Mexican government will maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso's value will not fluctuate significantly in the future. We cannot assure you that currency fluctuations, inflation and exchange control policies will not have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, earnings and cash flows.
If we are unable to obtain all of our required governmental permits or obtain property rights on favorable terms or at all, our business could be negatively impacted.
Future mining and current processing at our Velardeña Properties, the continued evaluation of the El Quevar project and other exploration activities will require additional permits from various governmental authorities. Our business is and will continue to be governed by laws and regulations governing mining, exploration, prospecting, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety, mining royalties and other matters. We may also be required to obtain certain property rights to access or use our properties. Obtaining or renewing licenses and permits, and acquiring property rights, can be complex and time-consuming processes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire all required licenses, permits or property rights on reasonable terms or in a timely manner, or at all, and that such terms will not be adversely changed, that required extensions will be granted, or that the issuance of such licenses, permits or property rights will not be challenged by third parties. Delays in obtaining or a failure to obtain any licenses, permits or property rights or any required extensions; challenges to the issuance of licenses, permits or property rights, whether successful or unsuccessful; changes to the terms of licenses, permits or property rights; or a failure to comply with the terms of any licenses, permits or property rights that have been obtained could have a material adverse effect on our business by delaying, preventing or making future mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties and other continued processing activities economically unfeasible. U.S. or international legislative or regulatory action to address concerns about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions could also negatively impact our business. While we will continue to monitor and assess any new policies, legislation or regulations regarding such matters, we currently believe that the impact of such legislation on our business will not be significant.
We depend on the services of key executives.
Our business strategy is based on leveraging the experience and skill of our management team. We are dependent on the services of key executives, including Warren Rehn and Robert Vogels. Due to our relatively small size, the loss of any of these persons or our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to manage and succeed in our mining and exploration activities.
The exploration of our mineral properties is highly speculative in nature, involves substantial expenditures and is frequently non-productive.
Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature and is frequently non-productive. Substantial expenditures are required to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we discover a deposit or ore at a property, it usually takes several years from the initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of a project may change because of increased costs, lower metal prices or other factors. As a result of these uncertainties, we may not successfully acquire additional mineral
39
rights, or our exploration programs may not result in proven and probable reserves at all or in sufficient quantities to justify developing the El Quevar project or any of our exploration properties.
The decisions about future advancement of exploration projects may be based on feasibility studies, which derive estimates of mineral reserves, operating costs and project economic returns. Estimates of economic returns are based, in part, on assumptions about future metal prices and estimates of average cash operating costs based upon, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual cash operating costs, production and economic returns may differ significantly from those anticipated by our studies and estimates.
Lack of infrastructure could forestall or prevent further exploration and advancement.
|
Exploration activities, as well as any advancement activities, depend on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources and water supply are important factors that affect capital and operating costs and the feasibility and economic viability of a project. Unanticipated or higher than expected costs and unusual or infrequent weather phenomena,
55
or government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our exploration activities are in countries with developing economiesRisks related to our Common Stock
One of our stockholders owns a significant percentage of our common stock and are subjectcould block decisions or transactions that could be beneficial to other stockholders.
One of our stockholders, The Sentient Group, through the risksSentient executive funds (“Sentient”), owns approximately 23% of political and economic instability associated with these countries.
We currently conduct exploration activities almost exclusively in countries with developing economies,our outstanding common stock. With this level of ownership, Sentient could exert significant control over us, including Argentina and Mexico. These countries and other emerging markets in which we may conduct business have from time to time experienced economic or political instability. We may be materially adversely affected by risks associated with conducting exploration activities in countries with developing economies, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in mining or investment policies or shifts in the prevailing political climate in any of the countries in which we conduct exploration activities could adversely affect our business.
We conduct our business in countries that may be adversely affected bydirectors, changes in the local government’s policies towardsize or laws governing the mining industry.
We have exploration activities primarily in Mexicocomposition of the board of directors, and Argentina. In these regions there exist uncertaintiesmergers and other business combinations involving us. Through greater control of the board of directors and increased voting power, including the potential to prevent a quorum at stockholders meetings, Sentient could control certain decisions, including decisions regarding future changes in applicable law related to miningqualification and exploration. For instance, in January 2014, amendments toappointment of officers, operations of the Mexico federal corporate income tax law require titleholdersbusiness including acquisition or disposition of our assets or purchases and sales of mining concessions to pay annually a 7.5% duty of their mining related profitsor exploration properties, dividend policy, and a 0.5% duty on revenues obtained from the sale of gold, silver and platinum that were effective March 2015. These additional duties applicable to Mexico mining concession titleholders will have a significant impact on the annual costs applicable to the Velardeña Properties if we have mining related profits or significant revenues in the future.
Additionally, effective January 2015, the Argentina National Mining Code was amended, increasing the annual canon payment by approximately four times. In 2017 and 2018, our annual canon fees payable to the Argentine government was $113,000 and $57,000 respectively, and we expect to pay approximately $60,000 in 2019.
In addition to the risk of increased transaction costs, we do not maintain political risk insurance to cover losses that we may incur as a result of nationalization, expropriation or similar events in Mexico or Argentina where we explore or have mining and processing activities.
We compete against larger and more experienced companies.
The mining industry is intensely competitive. Many large mining companies are primarily makers of precious or base metals and may become interested in the types of deposits on which we are focused, which include silver, gold and other precious metals deposits or polymetallic deposits containing significant quantities of base metals, including zinc, lead and copper. Many of these companies have greater financial resources, experience and technical capabilities than we do. We may encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in our efforts to acquire mineral properties and hire experienced mining professionals. Increased competition in our business could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable mining properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.
We are dependent on information technology systems, which are subject to certain risks, including cybersecurity risks and data leakage risks.
We are dependent upon information technology systems in the conduct of our business. Any significant breakdown, invasion, virus, cyber attack, security breach, destruction or interruption of these systems by employees, others with authorized access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of equity or debt securities). Sentient’s large share ownership will also make it difficult, if not impossible, for us to enter into a change of control transaction that may otherwise be beneficial for our systems, or unauthorized persons could negatively impact our business. To the extent any invasion, cyber attack or security breach results in disruption to our business, loss or disclosure of, or damage to, our data or confidential information, our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Our systems and insurance coverage for protecting against cyber security risks may not be sufficient. Although to date we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber attacks, we may suffer such losses in the future. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective
41
measures. We also may be subject to significant litigation, regulatory investigation and remediation costs associated with any information security vulnerabilities, cyber attacks or security breaches.other shareholders.
The existence of a significant number of warrants may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.
In connection
As of December 31, 2021, we had 10.8 million warrants outstanding with our financing in May 2016, we issued five year warrants to acquire 6,000,000 shares of our common stock at $0.75a weighted average exercise price per share expiring in November 2021. In connection with our financing in September 2014, we issued five year warrants to acquire 4,746,000 shares of our common stock at $1.21 per share expiring in September 2019. Pursuant to the anti-dilution clauses in the September 2014 warrant agreements, the exercise price of the warrants has been adjusted downward as a result of the subsequent issuance of our common stock in separate transactions, including pursuant to the Hecla Share Issuance (as defined herein), our ATM Program, the May 2016 financing, the conversion of the Sentient Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “Sentient Note”) and the May 2018 issuances under the LPC Program. As a result of these transactions, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the September 2014 warrants was increased from the original 4,746,000 shares to 5,517,696 shares (771,696 share increase) and the exercise price was reduced from the original $1.21 per share to $0.85 per share.$0.35. The existence of securities available for exercise and resale is referred to as an "overhang,"“overhang,” and, particularly if the warrants are "in the money," the anticipation of potential sales could exert downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.
Failure to meet the maintenance criteria of the NYSE American may result in the delisting of our common stock, which could result in lower trading volumes and liquidity, lower prices of our common shares and make it more difficult for us to raise capital.
Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American, andAmerican. In order to maintain that listing, we are subject to its continued listingmust meet certain requirements, including g maintaining certain share prices and a minimum amount of shareholders equity. Theshareholders’ equity and a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to objective standards, the NYSE American may delist the securities of any issuer if, in its opinion, the issuer’s financial condition and/or operating results appear unsatisfactory; if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market pricevalue of ourthe security has become so reduced as to make continued listing on the NYSE American inadvisable; if the issuer sells or disposes of principal operating assets or ceases to be an operating company; if an issuer fails to comply with the NYSE American’s listing requirements; if an issuer’s common stock has beensells at what the NYSE American considers a “low selling price” and may continuethe issuer fails to becorrect this via a reverse split of shares after notification by the NYSE American; or if any other event occurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing on the NYSE American, in its opinion, inadvisable.
On August 19, 2019, we received written notification (the “Notice”) from the NYSE American that were not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the NYSE American Company Guide (the “Company Guide”). We are required to report a stockholders’ equity of $6.0 million or more if we have reported losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in its five most recent fiscal years. The Notice noted that we reported a stockholders’ equity of $4,380,000 as of June 30, 2019 and losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in each of its five most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2018. As a result, we became subject to significant fluctuation. the procedures and requirements of Section 1009 of the Company Guide and were required to submit a plan of compliance by September 18, 2019 to the NYSE American addressing how we intended to regain compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide by February 19, 2021. On January 14,
56
2021, we received notice from the NYSE American that we had resolved the continued listing deficiency with respect to Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide and had regained compliance with all of the NYSE American continued listing requirements.
If we are unable to complyremain in compliance with the NYSE American continued listing requirements, including its trading price requirements, our common stock may be suspended from trading on and/or delisted from the NYSE American. Although we have not been notified of any delisting proceedings, there is no assurance that we will not receive such notice in the future or that we will be able to then comply with NYSE American listing standards. The delistingIf the NYSE American delists our common stock, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity, decreased analyst coverage of our common stocksecurities, and an inability for us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations. In particular, if we are delisted from the NYSE American, may materially impair our stockholders' abilitywe will be unable to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect onpursuant to the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock. In addition, the delisting of our common stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital.ATM Program.
If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer could find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock in the secondary market.
If our common stock were removed from listing on the NYSE American, it may be subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price per share of less than $5.00, subject to certain exceptions, such as any securities listed on a national securities exchange. For any transaction involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions. If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock on the secondary market. These factors could significantly negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital.
General Risks
Our operations may be further disrupted, and our financial results may be adversely affected by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
The novel strain of coronavirus known as COVID-19, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020, poses a risk to our business and operations. If a significant portion of our workforce becomes unable to work or travel to our operations due to illness or state or federal government restrictions (including travel restrictions and “shelter-in-place” and similar orders restricting certain activities that may be issued or extended by authorities), we may be forced to reduce or suspend exploration activities and/or development projects which may impact liquidity and financial results. These restrictions have significantly disrupted economic activity in the world, national and local economies and have caused volatility in capital markets. For example, in compliance with a directive of the Mexican Federal Government to suspend all non-essential activities, including mining, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we suspended processing activities at the Velardeña Properties in the State of Durango, Mexico, during portions of April and May 2020. If the Mexican Federal Government were to resuspend non-essential activities, including mining, this may significantly lower the revenue we expect to receive from production at our Rodeo Property. The various government restrictions arising due to the virus have curtailed the travel of our executives, which might adversely affect our operations on a long-term basis. The effects of the continued outbreak of COVID-19 and related government responses have caused and could continue to cause disruptions to supply chains and capital markets, reduced labor availability and productivity and a prolonged reduction in economic activity. These effects could have a variety of adverse impacts on us, including reduced demand for our products, impairment of goodwill or long-lived assets and impairment of our ability to develop and construct new mines and operate existing projects and to access funds from financial institutions and capital markets. In particular, these effects could disrupt or delay mining at our operating projects, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our operations, cash flow and financial condition. Due to circumstances beyond our control, including
57
the availability and distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine, we are unable to determine the long-term impact that the COVID-19 outbreak will have on operations.
To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial results as discussed above, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, such as those relating to our operations, indebtedness and financing. Because of the highly uncertain and dynamic nature of events relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is not currently possible to estimate the impact of the pandemic on our business. However, these effects could have a material impact on our operations, and we will continue to monitor the COVID-19 situation closely.
We may not be able to operate successfully if we are unable to recruit, hire, retain and develop key personnel and a qualified and diverse workforce. In addition, we are dependent upon our employees being able to safely perform their jobs, including the potential for physical injuries or illness.
We depend upon the services of a number of key executives and management personnel. These individuals include our executive officers and other key employees. If any of these individuals were to die, become disabled or leave our company, we would be forced to identify and retain individuals to replace them. We may be unable to hire a suitable replacement on favorable terms should that become necessary.
Our success is also dependent on the contributions of our highly skilled and experienced workforce. Our ability to achieve our operating goals depends upon our ability to recruit, hire, retain and develop qualified and diverse personnel to execute on our strategy. There continues to be competition over highly skilled personnel in our industry. If we lose key personnel or one or more members of our senior management team, and we fail to develop adequate succession plans, or if we fail to hire, retain and develop qualified and diverse employees, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be harmed. COVID-19 vaccine mandates and other COVID-19 related laws and policies could make hiring and retaining highly skilled key employees more difficult in the future.
Our business is dependent upon our workforce being able to safely perform their jobs, including the potential for physical injuries or illness. If we experience periods where our employees are unable to perform their jobs for any reason, including as a result of illness (such as COVID-19), our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have experienced temporary workforce disruptions and periods where we temporarily placed certain sites in care and maintenance. These events, or if similar events occur in the future, could have a material adverse impact on the business in the future.
We are dependent on information technology systems, which are subject to certain risks, including cybersecurity risks and data leakage risks.
We are dependent upon information technology systems in the conduct of our business. Any significant breakdown, invasion, virus, cyber attack, security breach, destruction or interruption of these systems by employees, others with authorized access to our systems, or unauthorized persons could negatively impact our business. To the extent any invasion, cyber attack or security breach results in disruption to our business, loss or disclosure of, or damage to, our data or confidential information, our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Our systems and insurance coverage for protecting against cyber security risks may not be sufficient. Although to date we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber attacks, we may suffer such losses in the future. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures. We also may be subject to significant litigation, regulatory investigation and remediation costs associated with any information security vulnerabilities, cyber attacks or security breaches.
58
42
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.During April 2021, the Company became aware of a lawsuit in Mexico against one of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries, Minera William, S.A. de C.V. (“Minera William”). The plaintiff in the matter is Unifin Financiera, S.A.B de C.V. (“Unifin”). The lawsuit was assigned to the Fifth Specialized Commercial District Court. Although the Company has knowledge of the existence and content of the lawsuit filed by Unifin, the Court has not officially served Minera William with the complaint as of the date of this report. Unifin is alleging that a representative of Minera William signed certain documents in July 2011 purporting to bind Minera William as a guarantor of payment obligations owed by a third party to Unifin in connection with that third party’s acquisition of certain drilling equipment. At the time the documentation was allegedly signed, Minera Williams was a subsidiary of ECU Silver Mining prior to the Company’s acquisition of ECU in September 2011. As a preemptive measure, Unifin has obtained a preliminary court order freezing Minera William’s bank accounts in Mexico, which has limited the Company’s and Minera William’s ability to access approximately US$153,000 according to current currency exchange rates. Notwithstanding this action, the restrictions imposed on Minera Williams’ bank accounts do not impact the Company’s ability to operate the Rodeo mine, which is held through a different Mexico subsidiary, or continue with the Company’s evaluation plans for a potential Velardeña mine restart or move forward with any of the Company’s other exploration programs in Mexico. Unifin is seeking recovery for as much as US$12.5 million. The Company believes there is no basis for this claim and will defend itself if and when the Company is formally served with notice of the lawsuit. As such, the Company has not accrued an amount for this matter in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or Statements of Operations as of December 31, 2021.
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
43
ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock began trading on the NYSE American under the symbol “AUMN” on March 19, 2010. Our common stock is also listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also referred to as the “TSX”, and trades under the symbol “AUMN”.
As of February 27, 2019,March 21, 2022, we had 185156 record holders of our common stock of record based upon the stockholders list provided by our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
Dividends
Dividends
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all future earnings, if any, to fund the growth of our business.
ITEM 6: SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated financial data for all periods presented has been derived from our audited financial statements for that period. Our financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| |||||
|
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| |||||||||||||
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
| $ | 7,217 |
| $ | 6,691 |
| $ | 6,400 |
| $ | 8,071 |
| $ | 235 |
|
Net Loss(1) |
| $ | (1,945) |
| $ | (3,892) |
| $ | (10,659) |
| $ | (25,383) |
| $ | (18,823) |
|
Net Loss per common share |
| $ | (0.02) |
| $ | (0.04) |
| $ | (0.13) |
| $ | (0.48) |
| $ | (0.41) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| At December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| |||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total assets |
| $ | 12,644 |
| $ | 13,077 |
| $ | 14,008 |
| $ | 17,001 |
| $ | 41,258 |
|
Long term liabilities |
| $ | 3,000 |
| $ | 3,138 |
| $ | 4,398 |
| $ | 2,840 |
| $ | 4,334 |
|
Dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
44
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes beginning on page F-1 in this annual report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual
59
results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Our Company
We were incorporated in Delaware under the Delaware General Corporation Law in March 2009 and are the successor to Apex Silver Mines Limited for purposes of reporting under the Exchange Act. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, our only sourcesprincipal source of income were revenuesrevenue was from the leasesale of gold and silver from our oxide plant, sales of non-core assets, and a tax refund received by an Argentine subsidiary.Rodeo Property in Durango, Mexico. We incurred net operating losses for the years ended December 31, 20182021, and 2017.2020.
We remain focused on evaluation activitiesmining operations at our El Quevar exploration property in Argentinathe Rodeo Property as well as the completion of further studies of a restart plan for Velardeña including the use of bio-oxidation to improve the payable gold recovery. We also continue to evaluate and on evaluating and searchingsearch for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near termnear-term prospects of mining, includingand particularly for properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña processing plants. Properties. We are also focused on advancing our El Quevar exploration property in Argentina through the Earn-In Agreement with Barrick and are continuing our exploration efforts on advancing selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 12 exploration properties, located in Mexico, Nevada and Argentina. We are reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico.
20182021 Highlights
El QuevarRodeo Property
We began mining activities at the Rodeo Property, using a contract miner, in December 2020. We began hauling the mined material, also using a contractor, for processing at our Velardeña oxide plant beginning in January 2021. We provide the overall mine management and engineering, which includes in-pit technicians who determine whether material is suitable for process or placement on the waste dump. We also employ and supervise the workforce responsible for processing activities at our oxide plant. Our assay lab, located in Velardeña, Durango, Mexico is used for the project’s assaying requirements. We poured our first doré bar at the end of January 2021 and completed our first shipment of doré to a refinery located in the United States in March 2021.
We installed a new regrind mill circuit at the plant specifically designed to process the harder mined material coming from the Rodeo Property, which was completed in April at a total cost of approximately $1.2 million. The new circuit, which was fully operational at the end of April, allowed us to increase daily throughput of Rodeo material in the oxide plant to at least 500 tonnes per day. Mill throughput averaged 532 tonnes per day in third quarter 2021 and 468 tonnes per day in fourth quarter 2021. At approximately 500 tonnes per day, the current life of the Rodeo mine is estimated to run into the third quarter of 2023, based on our current estimate of remaining mineral resources.
Assays from processing at the oxide plant indicate the doré extracted to date are generally comprised of approximately 20 to 30 percent gold and 65 to 80 percent silver and are of a quality that is readily marketable and saleable to refineries located either in the U.S., Mexico or internationally, consistent with standard commercial terms. We entered into a refining agreement with a third party located in the U.S. in February 2021 and have completed 37 shipments of doré as of March 9, 2022.
60
The table below sets forth the key processing and sales statistics for the Rodeo operation for the year ended December 31, 2021. Payable gold and silver produced in doré include final settlement adjustments for all doré produced through December 31, 2021:
| | |
Rodeo Operations Statistics | ||
(in thousands except per unit amounts) | ||
| | |
| | Year Ended |
| | December 31, 2021 |
Tonnes mined (1) | | 661,102 |
Tonnes in stockpiles awaiting processing (2) | | 14,068 |
Tonnes in low grade stockpiles (3) | | 69,567 |
Tonnes processed | | 149,411 |
Average tonnes per day processed | | 409 |
| | |
Average gold grade processed (grams per tonne) | | 4.1 |
Average silver grade processed (grams per tonne) | | 12.2 |
| | |
Plant recovery - gold (%) | | 74.9 |
Plant recovery - silver (%) | | 89.9 |
| | |
Payable gold produced in doré (ounces) | | 14,398 |
Payable silver produced in doré (ounces) | | 50,928 |
Payable gold equivalent produced in doré (ounces) (4) | | 15,104 |
| | |
Gold sold in doré (ounces) | | 13,772 |
Silver sold in doré (ounces) | | 48,970 |
Gold equivalent sold in doré (ounces) (4) | | 14,454 |
| | |
Average realized price, before refining and selling costs | | |
Gold (dollar per ounce) | | $1,793 |
Silver (dollar per ounce) | | $24.83 |
| | |
(1) Includes all mined material transported to the plant, stockpiled or designated as waste | ||
(2) Includes mined material stockpiled at the mine or transported to the plant awaiting processing in the plant | ||
(3) Material grading between 2 g/t (current cutoff grade) and 1 g/t Au held for possible future processing | ||
(4) Gold equivalents based on realized $ Au and $ Ag price | ||
61
The following table highlights additional non-GAAP cost and revenue statistics related to the Rodeo operations:
| | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2021 | | ||
| | | (in thousands except per unit amounts) | | |
| | | | | |
Total cash operating costs | | $ | 14,390 | | |
Treatment and refining costs | |
| 324 | | |
Silver by-product credits | | | (1,216) | | |
Total cash costs, net of by-product credits | | $ | 13,498 | | |
| | | | | |
Total cash cost per unit | | | | | |
Payable gold ounces produced in doré | |
| 14,398 | | |
Total cash operating costs | | $ | 999 | | |
Treatment and refining charges | |
| 23 | | |
Silver by-product credits | |
| (84) | | |
Total cash costs, net of by-product credits, per payable gold ounce (1) | | $ | 937 | | |
| | | | | |
Tonnes Processed in plant | | | 149,411 | | |
Total cash operating costs per tonne processed | | $ | 96 | | |
| | | | | |
(1) Cash costs, net of by-product credits, per payable ounce of gold is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below. | | ||||
Tonnes processed in the oxide plant for the full year 2021 were approximately 149,000, with grades for gold and silver averaging 4.2 and 12.1 grams per tonne, respectively, which is above the remaining life of mine average resource grades of approximately 2.9 and 11.7 grams per tonne for gold and silver, respectively, as depicted in the 2022 PEA. Payable extraction for the full year was approximately 14,400 ounces of gold and 59,900 ounces of silver, which exceeded initial guidance for the full year 2021 of 12,000 to 14,000 ounces of gold and 25,000 to 30,000 ounces of silver. Plant recovery for gold was approximately 74.9% for the full year 2021, as compared to projections based on 2022 PEA results of approximately 80%. Gold recoveries were lower than the PEA for the full year 2021 as we continued to balance the operating performance of the plant between higher throughput and recovery. We continue to optimize the mill circuit for increased recovery with a focus on a finer grind and additional aeration in the leach tank train.
Cash costs, net of silver by-product credits, were approximately $937 per payable gold ounce for the full year 2021. Our average realized prices for 2021 were $1,793 and $24.83 for gold and silver, respectively. Net operating margin for the full year 2021 from the Rodeo Property (defined as revenue from the sale of metals less the cost of metals sold) was approximately $12.3 million.
For the full year 2022, we are estimating that we will process 175,000 to 185,000 tonnes in the oxide plant, or approximately 500 tonnes per day, with payable extraction for 2022 of approximately 12,000 to 14,000 ounces of gold and 42,000 to 47,000 ounces of silver. Grades for 2022 are estimated to be approximately 2.9 grams per tonne for gold and 9.4 grams per tonne for silver, lower than grades achieved in 2021, but as anticipated in the PEA mine plan for 2022. Mill recoveries are expected to continue during 2022 near current rates of approximately 80 percent for both gold and silver. Higher expected total throughput in the oxide plant for the year 2022, as compared to 2021, will help offset the lower gold grades anticipated for 2022 resulting in similar payable gold extraction in 2022 as compared to 2021, but unit costs will be higher in 2022 as a result of higher plant throughput. Cash costs per payable gold ounce, net of silver by-product credits are expected to be approximately $1,100 to $1,200 for the full year 2022. Using an assumed gold price of $1,800/oz and
62
an assumed silver price of $25.00/oz, net operating margin for the full year 2022 from the Rodeo Property (defined as revenue from the sale of metals less the cost of metals sold) is estimated at approximately $7.0 million to $9.0 million.
The estimates detailed above for 2022 were derived using the actual results of operations achieved during 2021 and a projection of the mine plan, grades, plant throughput, and recoveries for 2022. Actual future results from mining at Rodeo may vary significantly based upon, among other things, unanticipated variations in grade, unexpected challenges associated with our proposed mining plan, volatility in commodity prices, variations in expected recoveries, increases in projected operating costs, working capital or capital costs or interruptions in mining. See “Risk Factors – Risk Factors related to our Mining and Processing Activities”.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Throughout this report, we have provided information prepared or calculated according to U.S. GAAP and have referenced some non-GAAP performance measures which we believe will assist with understanding the performance of our business. Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP.
“Total cash costs, net of by-product credits, per payable gold ounce,” includes all direct and indirect operating cash costs associated with the physical activities that would generate doré products for sale to customers, including mining to gain access to mineral resources, mining of mineral resources and waste, milling, third-party related treatment, refining and transportation costs, on-site administrative costs and royalties. Total cash costs do not include depreciation, depletion, amortization, exploration expenditures, reclamation and remediation costs, sustaining capital, financing costs, income taxes, or corporate general and administrative costs not directly or indirectly related to the Rodeo project. By-product credits include revenues from silver contained in the products sold to customers during the period. “Total cash costs, net of by-product credits”, are divided by the number of payable gold ounces produced by the plant for the period to arrive at “Total cash costs, net of by-product credits, per payable gold ounce.”
“Cost of metals sold”, reported as a separate line item in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2021, is the most comparable financial measure, calculated in accordance with GAAP, to “Total cash costs, net of by-product credits”. “Cost of metals sold” includes adjustments for changes in inventory and excludes third-party related treatment and refining costs, which are reported as part of revenue in accordance with GAAP. The following table presents a reconciliation for the year ended December 31, 2021 between the non-GAAP measure of “Total cash cost, net of by-product credits” to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, “Cost of metals sold”.
63
| | | | |
| | | Reconciliation of Costs of Metals Sold (GAAP) to Total Cash Costs, net of By-product Credits (Non-GAAP) | |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 | | | | |
Total cash costs, net of by-product credits |
| $ | 13,498 | |
| | | | |
Reconciliation to GAAP measure: | | | | |
Treatment and refining costs | | $ | (324) | |
Silver by-product credits | | | 1,216 | |
Write down of inventories to net realizable value | |
| 17 | |
Change in inventory (excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization) | |
| (1,096) | |
Cost of metals sold |
| $ | 13,311 | |
Rodeo Exploration
In 2017, Amec Foster Wheeler E&C Services, Inc.,October 2021, we completed an exploration drilling program at Rodeo aimed at expanding the resource. The program included about 5,648 meters in 82 shallow holes at selected near-surface targets located immediately adjacent to the current pit. In November 2021, we announced the final assay results from the drilling program, which included potentially resource-grade intercepts on the north, south and west sides of the currently planned open pit. The drill program included 47 reverse circulation (RC) holes totaling 3,187 meters and 35 core holes totaling 2,461 meters. The drill program has modestly extended the life of mine plan for Rodeo through the third quarter of 2023 based on processing material at a Wood Group PLC company (“Wood”) undertookcut-off grade of 1.6 g/t Au. In January 2022 we began a small additional RC drill program (approximately 2,500 m) to finish delineating the mineralized area on the south side of the current pit.
Velardeña
The Velardeña Properties contain two underground mines that were last operated in late 2015, at which point mining activities were suspended when a combination of low metals prices, mining dilution and metallurgical challenges rendered operations unprofitable. We elected to preserve the asset for future use, and since that time we have evaluated and tested various mining methods and processing alternatives that could enable sustainable profitable operations.
The recent rise in precious metals prices, the advancement of alternative processing technologies in the industry, and the results of our testing activities prompted us to pursue the preparation of an analysisupdated NI 43-101 preliminary economic assessment (PEA) based partly on projected increased gold recoveries from a proposed bio-oxidation circuit to treat gold-bearing pyrite concentrates. In April 2020, we announced positive results from the updated PEA.
In June 2021 we began limited scale mining activities at our Velardeña underground mine to obtain further bulk samples for use in final optimization of the bio-oxidation plant design and re-modelingfor use in additional flotation separation studies that will indicate how we can best separate the gold-bearing minerals into the pyrite-arsenopyrite concentrate that is proposed for processing in the bio-oxidation circuit. We are also testing mining methods to ensure that we can effectively control mining dilution to obtain the head grades that we expect based on our PEA study. We expect to have the results of data utilizedthese studies in early 2022.
Yoquivo
In September 2020, we began a 2012 mineralized material estimate3,400-meter, 15-hole drill program to test the most promising portions of certain veins in the Yoquivo property in Chihuahua, Mexico. We completed the drill program in December 2020 and identified
64
four separate vein systems in which surface sampling has returned grades up to 4,050 g/t silver and 27.7 g/t gold from surface. Of substantial interest was the discovery of a new vein parallel to and east of the Pertenencia vein. While the other principal veins have been partially mined from surface to the water table (up to 130 meters) in the case of San Francisco and Pertenencia, and over a much less extensive vertical interval in the case of El Dolar and Esperanza, the new vein is unmined from surface. We began a second phase drill program in October 2021. The drill program included 3,949 meters comprised of 21 holes exploring the Pertenencia, Esperanza and Dolar vein systems. In January 2022 we announced assay results from the first five holes of the 21-hole, second phase drill program. The drill program demonstrated the potential for ourthe Pertenencia vein to host significant high-grade mineralization and hit multiple high-grade veins, suggesting there may be additional blind veins to be found on the property. We recently submitted an application with SEMARNAT for a 50-hole, 10,000 meter drill program, which we plan to commence in 2022 upon receipt of necessary permits.
.
El Quevar
In April 2020, we entered into the Earn-in Agreement with Barrick, pursuant to which Barrick has acquired an option to earn a 70% interest in the Company’s El Quevar project located in the Salta Province of Argentina which was based on results from 270 core drill holes and assumed mining of oxide material from an open pit on the east end(the “Option”). For a description of the Yaxtché deposit and sulfide material from both the open pit and an underground mine on the western portion of the Yaxtché deposit. The Wood estimate, which the Company announced in February 2018, used updated geologic controls and a modeling method that optimized silver grade assuming mining would occur solely underground. According to the Wood estimate, sulfide mineralized material in the Yaxtché deposit, at a cut-off grade of 250 grams per tonne (“g/t”) silver and using a three-year average silver price of $16.62 per ounce, was 2.6 million tonnes at an average silver grade of 487 g/t.
In September 2018, we completed a preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) that used the revised estimate of mineralized material for the Yaxtché deposit as a basis. The PEA contemplates a six-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at a mine production rate of 1,200 tonnes per day using a post-pillar cut-and-fill mining method that will deliver 2.45 million tonnes of diluted sulfide material at an average grade of 409 g/t silver. As contemplated in the PEA, the mined material would be processed using a conventional single product flotation mill that would produce a silver-rich bulk concentrate suitable for sale.
The Yaxtché deposit is open to the west and there are numerous drill intercepts with silver grades of economic interest in the nearby area that represent targets for further expansion. In the first quarter 2019, we plan to initiate a 3,000 meter, approximately $0.6 million drilling program to further define the potential for additional mineralized material in the Yaxtché deposit and surrounding area. We plan to continue to advanceEarn-In Agreement, see “Our Material Mining Properties – El Quevar as much as possible within the limits of”in our current exploration budget and remain open to finding a partner to contribute to the funding of further exploration and development.
45
Velardeña Oxide Plant Lease Agreement
On October 1, 2018, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company (together “Hecla”) exercised its option, pursuant to an agreement entered into with us in August 2017, to extend the lease of our Velardeña oxide plant until December 31, 2020. Hecla has the right to terminate the lease for any reason with 120 days’ notice. Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following a termination notice through December 31, 2020 if we decide to use the oxide plant for our own purposes before December 31, 2020.
Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant. During the year ended December 31, 2018, Hecla processed approximately 142,000 tonnes of material through the oxide plant, resulting in total revenues to us of approximately $7.2 million, comprised of approximately $4.9 million for direct plant charges and fixed fees and approximately $2.3 million for other net reimbursable costs related to the services we provide under the lease. The $2.3 million of reimbursable costs are also reported as plant lease costs, resulting in net operating margin of approximately $4.9 millionAnnual Report Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. We expect Hecla2021. During the earn-in period, in addition to continue to process material near the intended approximately 400 tonnes per day rate during 2019, which would generate a net operating margin to us, net of reimbursableexploration spending, Barrick will fund the holding costs of approximately $4.6 million during the full year 2019. However, because Hecla has the right to terminate the lease with 120 days’ notice, there is no assurance that these amountsproperty, which will continue through 2019 or beyond.
Celaya Farm-out
In September 2018, our wholly owned Mexican subsidiary entered into a second and final amendment to an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum Group LLC, a privately owned company (together “Electrum”),qualify as work expenditures. Barrick will reimburse us for expenses related to maintaining the farm-out of our Celaya exploration property in Mexico. Pursuant to the second amendment, Electrum acquired 100% of our remaining interest in the Celaya project in exchange forcamp, which will initially be run by us under a payment of $3.0 million,service agreement, and which will also qualify as set out in a definitive Assignment of Rights Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) containing customary terms and conditions. The earn-in agreement was terminated upon entry into the Assignment Agreement.
The Celaya earn-in agreement with Electrum commenced in August 2016 when we received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling at least $0.5 million within the first year of the agreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurred on the property sincework expenditures. Through December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program. Electrum initially earned the right to acquire an undivided 60% interest in a joint venture company to be formed to hold the Celaya project by incurring exploration expenditures totaling at least $2.5 million during the initial first three years of the agreement. Electrum would serve as manager of the joint venture. Prior to the subsequent amendments to the agreement, we would have been allowed to maintain a 40% interest in the Celaya project, following the initial earn-in period, by contributing our pro-rata share of an additional $2.5 million in exploration or development expenditures incurred over a second three-year period.
In February 2018, we amended the Celaya earn-in agreement to permit Electrum to earn, at its option, an incremental 20% interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a payment of $1.0 million. Following the amendment, Electrum could have increased its total interest in the project to 80% by contributing 100% of the $2.531, 2021, approximately $0.9 million of additional expenditures required in the second three-year earn-in period. Following the second earn-in period, and prior to entering into the Assignment Agreement, we could have maintained our 20% participating interest or our interest could ultimately have been converted into a carried 10% net profits interest if we elected not to participate as a joint venture owner.
We have previously expensed all of our costs associated with the Celaya property and accordingly recognized a gain of $1.0 million from the execution of the first amendment to the agreement and $3.0 million upon execution of the Assignment Agreement, for the nine month period ended September 30, 2018, included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
46
Santa Maria
Since 2015, we have completed test mining and processing of 7,100 dry tonnes from the Santa Maria mine west of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua, with average grades 338 g/t silver and 0.8 g/t gold. In March 2017, a PEA was completed on our behalf by the engineering firm Tetra Tech, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on an updated estimate of mineralized material. The PEA presented a base case assessment of developing Santa Maria’s mineral deposit. In September 2018, Tetra Tech completed a second PEA for the Santa Maria project that incorporates data accumulated since March 2017, including an additional 77 hectares of mineral tenure acquired in August 2017 that covers the on-strike and downdip extensions of the Santa Maria vein systems. The new PEA also incorporates information from a 22-hole, 4,800-meter drilling program begun in August 2017 and completed in April 2018. Including the latest drill program, we have drilled 9,900 meters in 59 holes since acquiring the property. Surface mapping and sampling has also identified additional high-grade veins on the adjacent eastern extension of the Santa Maria property and on new veins to the north located outside of the mineralized material area as defined in the March 2017 PEA.
The September 2018 PEA shows improvement in projected cash flow, metal production and profitability compared to the previous study. The PEA estimates a 4.2-year underground mining operation using pre-existing and new underground development at an average mine production rate of 218 tonnes per day, using a combination of cut-and-fill and sublevel stoping. It is currently envisioned that both mixed and sulfide materials will undergo toll-milling at a local third-party facility with sulfide flotation circuits. Oxide material will be cyanide leached at the same toll-milling facility. In the PEA, Santa Maria is estimated to deliver 150k tonnes of diluted sulfide material to the mill at an average grade of 378 g/t silver equivalent (“AgEq”, calculated by combining Ag and Au values where one g/t of Au equals 74 g/t of Ag), 116k tonnes of diluted oxide material at an average grade of 428 g/t AgEq and 42k tonnes of diluted mixed material at an average grade of 278 g/t AgEq.
We have the right to acquire 100% of the Santa Maria property under two separate option agreements representing the total concessions that comprise the property for additional payments of $1.0 million, payable through April 2022. The first option agreement covers concessions we acquired in August 2014 and requires an additional approximately $0.4 million be paid by continuing to make minimum payments of $0.2 million in 2019 and $0.2 million in 2020. In addition, until the total due under the first option agreement has been paid, the property owners have the right to 50% of any net profits from mining activities from the concessions related to the option, after reimbursement of all costsexpenses incurred by us since April 2015,have been or are expected to be reimbursable under the extent that such net profit payments exceedEarn-in Agreement. As of December 31, 2021, Barrick had met the minimum payments. The second option agreement covers concessions recently acquired in August 2017 and requires an additional approximately $0.6 million be paid by making additional payments of $0.2$1 million in each ofwork expenditures required by the years 2019 through 2021.Earn-in Agreement.
ZacatecasSarita Este / Desierto
In April 2016,December 2019 we enteredpaid $150,000 to enter into an option agreement which was later amended in February 2018, under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.with Cascadero Minerals Corporation (“Santacruz”Cascadero”) has acquired ourto acquire a 51% interest in the Zacatecas Properties for a series of payments totaling approximately $1.5 million. Payments of $249,000, $225,000 and $212,000 were paid to us during the first, second and third quarters of 2018, respectively. The final payment of $13,000 was received by us in October 2018.
We had previously expensed all of the costs associated with the Zacatecas Properties. We recognized income, equal to the cash payments made, evenly over the period covered by each payment. We have recognized approximately $748,000 of income under the agreement for the year ended December 31, 2018, included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2018, there were no further performance obligations and we had taken all steps necessary for Santacruz to take title to the properties.
Other Exploration - Yoquivo
The Yoquivo property was acquired in 2017 and consists of 1,907 hectares in 6 claims that cover an epithermal vein district hosted in Tertiary andesitic volcanic rocks that is exposed in an erosional window through Oligocene rhyolite
47
on the eastern margin of the Sierra Madre Occidental of northern Mexico. The property is 200 km SW of Chihuahua city in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. Recent surface rock sampling has demonstrated gold and silver values of potential economic interest in several of the veins in the district. We have an option to purchase the six concessions that comprise the Yoquivo property for payments totaling $0.5 million over four years subject to a 2% NSR royalty on production, capped at $2 million.
In October 2018 we announced high-grade silver-gold assays from the Yoquivo project. Multiple silver-gold bearing epithermal veins were mapped and sampled, with the two most important veins being the San Francisco and Pertenencia veins. A new vein, the La Nina vein, was discoveredgold/copper Sarita Este concession, located in the northwest portion of the property where it splits offProvince of Salta, Argentina, located near the Taca Taca project owned by First Quantum Minerals. The option agreement called for us to spend at least $0.3 million in exploration expenditures and complete a 2,000-meter drill program by the end of 2021, another $0.5 million by the end of 2022, and another approximately $1.6 million by 2023 for a total $2.5 million. We have spent approximately $1.4 million since entering into the agreement in December 2019.
In the fourth quarter of 2021 we completed the first drill program ever conducted at Sarita Este, which involved drilling 10 diamond drill holes totaling 2,518 meters to explore untested epithermal gold-silver and copper porphyry targets. In January 2022 we announced assay results from the main San Francisco vein. We are focusing exploration efforts on the Pertenencia vein, which appears to be more silver-rich compared to the San Francisco vein. Sampling of the Pertenencia vein is still in progress as is surface work in preparation for identifying the best drill targets. We expect to begin a drill program, in 2019 to testincluding the most promising portionspotential of the veins. A permit for drilling has been obtained.
Registered direct purchase agreementan oxidized gold system and commitment purchase agreement and registration rights agreement
On May 9, 2018 we entered into a registered direct purchase agreement (the “Registered Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“LPC”) pursuant to which LPC purchased 3,153,808 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.4122 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE American on May 8, 2018, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.3 million. On the same day, we also entered into a commitment purchase agreement (the “Commitment Purchase Agreement” and together with the Registered Purchase Agreement, the “LPC Program”) pursuant to which we have the right for a period of three years, at our sole discretion, to sell up to an additional $10.0 million of our common stock to LPC, subject to certain limitations and conditions contained in the Commitment Purchase Agreement.
Subject to the terms of the Commitment Purchase Agreement, we will control the timing and amount of any future sale of common stock to LPC. LPC has no right to require any sales by us under the Commitment Purchase Agreement but is obligated to make purchases at our sole direction, as governed by such agreement. There are no upper limits to the price LPC may be obligated to pay to purchase common stock from us and the purchase price of the shares will be based on the prevailing market prices of our shares at the time of each sale to LPC. LPC has agreed not to cause or engage in any manner whatsoever, any direct or indirect short selling or hedging of our shares of common stock.copper porphyry system. We have the rightsubmitted new permits for trenching and additional drilling that we plan to terminate the Commitment Purchase Agreement at any time, at our discretion, without any cost or penalty.complete during a 2022 field campaign.
As of December 31, 2018, no additional common stock had been sold to LPC under the LPC Program following the initial sale of common stock pursuant to the Registered Purchase Agreement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018 we sold an aggregate of approximately 745,000 common shares under the Commitment Purchase Agreement at an average price of $0.31 per common share for total proceeds of approximately $230,000 during the year to date period ended February 27, 2019.
Results of Operations
For the results of operations discussed below, we compare the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 20182021, to the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
Revenue from the sale of metals. We recorded $25.6 million in revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021, all from the sale of gold and silver bearing doré from the Rodeo Operation in Mexico. We did not record any revenue from doré sales for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Costs of metals sold. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded $13.2 million of costs of metals sold. Because we did not record any revenue from doré sales during the year, we did not record any cost of metals sold during the year ended December 31, 2020.
65
Revenue from oxide plant lease. We recorded revenue of $7.2 million and $6.7$5.6 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 respectively2020, from the lease of our Velardeña oxide plant to Hecla.Hecla in the accompanying financial statements. Hecla terminated the Lease Agreement in accordance with the terms of the Third Amendment one month early, effective November 30, 2020. We did not record any plant lease related income for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Oxide plant lease costs. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 20172020, we recorded $2.3 and $2.2$2.0 million respectively of costs related to the oxide plant lease consisting primarily of reimbursable labor and utility costs which for accounting purposes were also included in revenue from the oxide plant lease. Hecla terminated the Lease Agreement in accordance with the terms of the Third Amendment one month early, effective November 30, 2020.
48
Exploration Expense. Our exploration expense, including work at Rodeo, Velardeña and other properties, totaled $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Our exploration expense, including work at the Santa MariaRodeo, Sand Canyon, Yoquivo and other properties, property holding costs and allocated administrative expenses, totaled $3.9$5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Our exploration expense, including work at the Santa Maria, Mogotes and other properties, totaled $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Exploration expense for both years was incurred primarily in Mexico and includes property holding costs, costs incurred by our local exploration offices, and allocated corporate administrative expenses. Exploration expenses wereThe higher in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the prior period dueexploration expense for 2021 is primarily related to increased exploration activities at our Santa MariaVelardeña Properties and otherRodeo operation in Mexico properties.and Sarita Este property in Argentina during the period.
Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance costs. We recorded $1.9$1.4 million and $1.6$1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 20182021, and 2017,2020, respectively, for expenses related to shut down and care and maintenance at our Velardeña Properties as the result of the suspension of mining and processing activities in November 2015. The higher careincreased costs for 2021 are primarily related to certain increases in employee related benefits.
El Quevar Project Expense. As discussed above, during April 2020, we entered into the Earn-In Agreement with Barrick, pursuant to which Barrick has acquired an option to earn a 70% interest in the El Quevar project. During the earn in period Barrick has and will continue to reimburse us for certain holding and maintenance costs in 2018 are related to increased maintenance.
El Quevar Project Expense.the project. During the year ended December 31, 20182021, we incurred $1.3recorded an expense of approximately $0.3 million primarily related to holding and evaluation costs for the Yaxtché deposit at ourthe El Quevar project, in Argentina.net of costs reimbursed. During the year ended December 31, 20172020, we recorded an expense of approximately $0.8$0.6 million primarily related to exploration, holding and evaluation costs for the Yaxtché deposit at ourthe El Quevar project, in Argentina. The additional spending in 2018 was primarily related to thenet of costs of preparing the technical reports and preparing for exploration drilling.reimbursed. For both years, additional nominal costs incurred in Argentina and not related to the El Quevar project are included in “Exploration Expense”, discussed above.
Administrative Expense. Administrative expenses totaled $3.4$4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20182021, compared to $3.5$3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Administrative expenses, including costs associated with being a public company, are incurred primarily by our corporate activities in support of the Rodeo project, Velardeña Properties, El Quevar project and our exploration portfolio. The $3.4$4.8 million of administrative expenses we incurred during 20182021 is comprised of $1.6$2.5 million of employee compensation and directors’ fees, $0.9 million of professional fees and $0.9 million of insurance, travel expenses, rents, utilities and other office costs. The $3.5 million of administrative expenses we incurred during 2017 is comprised of $1.6 million of employee compensation and directors’ fees, $0.8$1.2 million of professional fees, and $1.1 million of insurance, rents, travel expenses, utilities and other office costs. The $3.7 million of administrative expenses we incurred during 2020 is comprised of $1.4 million of employee compensation and directors’ fees, $1.3 million of professional fees, and $1.0 million of insurance, rents, travel expenses, utilities and other office costs.
Stock based compensation. During the year ended December 31, 20182021, we incurred expense related to stock-based compensation in the amount of $0.2$1.6 million compared to $0.3$0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Stock based compensation varies from period to period depending on the number and timing of shares granted, the type of grant, the market value of the shares on the date of grant and other variables. The 2018 and 2017 stock-based compensation amounts include a $0.1 million reduction of expense and $0.1 million of expense, respectively, related to KELTIP grants made to two officers and the related fair value adjustments to the KELTIP liability (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Form 10-K for a discussion of KELTIP grants).
Reclamation and accretion expense. During each of the years ended December 31, 20182021, and 20172020, we incurred $0.3 million and $0.2 million of reclamation expense, respectively, related to the accretion of an asset retirement obligation at the Velardeña Properties.
66
Other Operating Income, Net. We recorded $5.1$0.5 million of other operating income for the year ended December 31, 2018, consisting of $4.0 million related to an option payment and the ultimate sale of our Celaya property, $0.7 million from payments received on our Zacatecas Properties and $0.4 million2021, primarily related to the amortization of deferred income related to the option agreement for the sale of two non-strategic Mexican subsidiaries.the Santa Maria property, as discussed above. We recorded only a nominal amount of other operating income of $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, including $1.0 million2020, consisting primarily of net gains recorded on the salessale of certain fixed assets and non-strategic exploration properties in Mexico and a $1.1 million VAT tax refund in Argentina.surplus equipment.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. During the year ended December 31, 20182021, we incurred depreciation, depletion and amortization expense of $1.2$0.6 million compared to $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. The increase inlower depreciation depletion and amortization expenserecorded during the 2018 period is primarily2021 was the result of increased depreciation at our Velardeña Properties.various assets becoming fully depreciated during 2021.
49
Interest and Other Income,expense, net. During We recorded approximately $0.4 million of interest and other expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2018 we2021, primarily related to write-off of deferred costs related to the Lincoln Park Capital program. We recorded approximately $0.1 million of interest and other income primarily related to mark-to-market gains on short-term investments. Duringexpense, net for the year ended December 31, 2017 we recorded only a nominal amount2020, primarily related to interest incurred on the repayment of interestthe Autlán advanced payment and other income. the financing of certain insurance premiums.
Gain (Loss) on Foreign Currency. We recorded a $0.2 million foreign currency gain and a $0.1 million foreign currency loss in each offor the years ended December 31, 20182021, and 2017.December 31, 2020, respectively. Foreign currency gains and losses are primarily related to the effect of currency fluctuations on monetary assets net of liabilities held by our foreign subsidiaries that are denominated in currencies other than USU.S. dollars.
Income Taxes. We recorded no tax expense or benefit for the year ended December 31, 2018. We recorded $13,000 ofa $462,000 income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 20172021 and $48,000 income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in income taxes in 2021 is related to a Mexican subsidiary. the start up of profitable operations at the Rodeo Property during 2021.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2018,2021, our aggregate cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.3$12.2 million, equalcompared to the $3.3$9.7 million in similar assets held at December 31, 2017.2020. The December 31, 20182021 balance is due in part from the following expenditures and cash inflows for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. Expenditures totaled $10.8$14.1 million from the following:
| $ |
| $1.6 million in capital expenditures, including $1.4 million related to construction of the new regrind mill circuit and other projects related to the Rodeo project; |
● | $ |
| $ |
| $ |
| $ |
The foregoing expenditures were offset by cash inflows of $10.8$16.6 million from the following:
67
| $ |
|
|
|
|
| ● | $1.8 million, net of fees from the ATM Program (as further described in |
| $ |
| $ |
In addition to the $3.3$12.2 million cash balance at December 31, 2018,2021, we expect to receive approximately $4.6$7.0 million to $9.0 million in net operating margin from the leaseRodeo Property (defined as revenue from the sale of metals less the oxide plantcost of metals sold) during the next twelve-month periodtwelve months ending December 31, 2019. In addition, subsequent to2022, assuming an average gold and silver price during that period of $1,800 and $25.00 oz respectively (our realized prices for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 we received approximately $0.22021, as shown above, were $1,793 and $24.83 for gold and silver, respectively). Our forecasted cash inflows during the twelve months ending December 31, 2022 also include the anticipated third and final installment of $2.0 million from the sale of our common stock
50
under the LPC Program. Santa Maria property to Fabled, scheduled to be paid in December 2022, as discussed above, as we believe it is probable this installment will be received based on Fable’s performance to date.
Our currently budgetedforecasted expenditures during the twelve months ending December 31, 2019 are2022, apart from Rodeo cost of metals sold, which is already included in our forecast of net operating margin, and also apart from a positive decision to move forward with the start-up of the Velardeña operation, as discussed above, total approximately $10.2 million as follows:
| Approximately |
| Approximately |
| Approximately |
| Approximately |
| ● | Approximately $0.8 million of working capital related primarily to a reduction of accounts payable and other accrued liabilities related to bonuses and other expense items accrued at December 31, 2021. |
IfOur forecasted cash resources of approximately $21.2 to $23.2 million, which include cash on hand at December 31, 2021, the forecasted net operating margin from the Rodeo Property, and the anticipated third installment of $2.0 million from the sale of the Santa Maria property to Fabled, are greater than our forecasted expenditures of approximately $10.2 million. The actual amount of cash receipts that we spendreceive during the period from the Rodeo operation may vary significantly from the amounts describedspecified above we would end 2019due to, among other things: (i) unanticipated variations in grade, (ii) unexpected challenges associated with a cash balance of approximately zero. However, we do not intend to allow our cash balance to dropproposed mining plan, (iii) decreases in commodity prices below acceptable levels. Therefore, during 2019 we intend to take appropriate actions, which may include sales of certain of our nonstrategic exploration assets, reductions to our currently budgeted level of spending, and/those used in calculating the estimates shown above, (iv) variations in expected recoveries, (v) increases in operating costs above those used in calculating the estimates shown above, or raising additional equity capital through sales under(vi) interruptions in mining at Rodeo. In addition, the ATM Program, LPC Program or otherwise.
The actual amount of cash that we receive orfrom the anticipated third installment of $2.0 million from the sale of the Santa Maria property to Fabled is dependent on Fabled’s decision to pay the amount that is due to us under the terms of the Fabled Option Agreement on a timely basis. The actual amount of cash expenditures that we incur during the year ended 2019 and the projected cash balance at twelve-month period ending
68
December 31, 20192022 may vary significantly from the amounts specified above and will depend on a number of factors, including variations fromin the anticipated care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties or at El Quevar, and costs for continued exploration, project assessment, and development atadvancement of our other exploration properties, including El Quevar. Moreover, revenues from the oxide plant lease may beproperties. Likewise, if cash expenditures are greater than anticipated or if cash receipts are less than anticipated, which would require furtherwe may need to take certain actions on our part in order to maintain sufficient cash balances at year end. over the next twelve months, including additional asset dispositions or raising additional equity capital through sales under the ATM Program or otherwise.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of business. However, our continuing long-term operations aremay be dependent upon our ability to continue currently profitable operations and to secure sufficient funding, andif needed, to generate future profitable operations. The underlying value and recoverability of the amounts shown as property, plant and equipment in our condensed consolidated financial statements are dependent on our ability to continue to generate positive cash flows from operations and to continue to fund exploration and development activities that would lead to additional profitable mining and processing activities or to generate proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in generatingcontinuing to generate profitable mining and processing activities or to securing additional funding, if needed, to generate future profitable operations or securing additional funding in the future on terms acceptable to us or at all. We believe the continuing cash flowon hand, anticipated positive net operating margins from the lease ofRodeo operation, the oxide plant,potential use of the ATM Program and LPC Program, and the potential for additional asset dispositions make it probable that we will have sufficient cash to meet our financial obligations and continue our business strategy beyond one year from the filing of our consolidated financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2018.2021.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The selection and application of accounting policies is an important process that has developed as our business activities have evolved and as the accounting rules have changed. Accounting rules generally do not involve a selection among alternatives, but involve an implementation and interpretation of existing rules, and the use of judgment, to the specific set of circumstances existing in our business. Discussed below are the accounting policies that we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue or expense being reported.
Income Recognition
51
time relating to the receipt of periodic payments as the Company satisfies its performance obligation.
Mineral Reserves
We do not have defined mineral reserves pursuant to Regulation SK subpart 1300 (“S-K 1300”) and all of our mining properties are in the exploration stage. When and if we determine that a mineralmining property has proven and probablemineral reserves, subsequent development costs arewill be capitalized to mineralthose properties. When mineralwe commence extraction at our mining properties, are developed and operations commence, capitalized costs are charged to operations using the units-of-production method over proven and probable reserves. “Mineralized material” as used in this annual report, although permissible under SEC’s Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards, and therefore all development costs incurred by us are expensed when incurred. The Companymethod. We cannot be certain that any part of the deposits at the Velardeña Properties or the Yaxtché deposit at the El Quevar projectour properties will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7S-K 1300 compliant “reserves”.reserves.
Asset Retirement Obligations
We record asset retirement obligations in accordance with Auditing Standards Codification (“ASC”)ASC 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (“ASC 410”), which establishes a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. According to ASC 410, the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. AnTo the extent that the
69
ARO is related to fixed plant and equipment, an offsetting asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets with which it is associated and depreciated over the useful life of the asset.
Long Lived Assets
Long lived assets are recorded at cost and per the guidance of ASC 360 the Company assesseswe assess the recoverability of itsour long lived assets, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of estimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related asset, impairment is considered to exist. The related impairment loss is measured by comparing estimated future net cash flows on a discounted basis or by comparing other market indicators to the carrying amount of the asset.
TableFunctional Currency
Our revenue and external funding are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. Additionally, substantially all of Contractual Obligationour significant expenditures are made with reference to U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the Company and its subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional and reporting currency.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| More |
|
|
|
|
| Less Than |
| 1 - 3 |
| 3 - 5 |
| Than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
| Total |
| 1 Year |
| Years |
| Years |
| 5 Years |
|
|
| (in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||
Operating leases(1) |
| 1,024 |
| 224 |
| 317 |
| 329 |
| 154 |
|
El Quevar and Velardeña concession payments(2) |
| 700 |
| 140 |
| 280 |
| 280 |
| — | (3) |
|
|
|
|
5270
|
|
From time to time we enter into lease or option agreements related to exploration properties that are of interest to us. These agreements typically contain escalating payments required to maintain our exploration rights to the property. Such agreements are not included in the above table because exploration success is historically low and we have the right to terminate the agreements at any time.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
We invest substantially all of our excess cash with high credit-quality financial institutions or in U.S. government and debt securities rated “investment grade” or better. The rates received on such investments may fluctuate with changes in economic conditions. Based on the average cash, restricted cash, investments and restricted investment balances outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, a 1.0% decrease in interest rates would have resulted in a reduction in interest income for the period of less than approximately $0.1 million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Although most of our expenditures are in U.S. dollars, certain purchases of labor, supplies and capital assets are denominated in other currencies. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact the costs of our mining and exploration activities. To reduce this risk, we maintain minimum cash balances in foreign currencies and complete most of our purchases in U.S. dollars.
Commodity Price Risk
We are primarily engaged in the exploration and mining of properties containing silver, gold, zinc, lead and other minerals. As a result, decreases in the price of any of these metals have the potential to negatively impact our ability to establish reserves and mine on our properties. For further detail regarding the effect on our expected cash flow from fluctuations in silver and gold prices, see “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Liquidity and Capital Resources” above.
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The consolidated financial statements and supplementary information filed as part of this Item 8 are listed under Part IV, Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules” and contained in this annual report on Form 10-K at page F-1.
53
ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
TheOur management of Golden Minerals Company has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018.2020.
Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2018,2021, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective and designed to provide reasonable assurance that (i) information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
71
The management of Golden Minerals, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of our controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2018,2021, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2018period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C: DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
5472
ITEM 10: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
For Information regarding our executive officers, see “Items 1 and 2: Business and Properties—Executive Officers of Golden Minerals” and “Items 1 and 2: Business and Properties—Board of Directors of Golden Minerals.”
Additional information is incorporatedIncorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and those of our officers performing similar functions. The full text of our code of ethics can be found on the Corporate Governance page on our website. In the event our Board of Directors approves an amendment to or waiver from any provision of our code of ethics, we will disclose the required information pertaining to such amendment or waiver on our website.
ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
5573
PART IV
ITEM 15: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESSCHEDULES
a. | Documents filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference: |
(1) | Our consolidated financial statements are listed on the “Index to Financial Statements” on Page |
(2) | Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements or related notes). |
(3) | The following exhibits are filed with this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference. |
5674
Exhibit | | Description |
| |
|
3.1 | ||
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company.(2) | |
| | |
3.2 | | |
| | |
3.3 | | |
| | |
3.4 | | |
| | |
3.5 | | |
| | |
4.1 | | |
| | |
4.2 | | |
| | |
4.3 | | |
| | |
4.4 | | |
| | |
4.5 | | |
| | |
4.6 | | |
| | |
10.1 | | |
| | |
10.2 | | |
| | |
10.3 | | |
| | |
10.4 | | Golden Minerals Company Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.(6) |
| | |
10.5 | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.(7) |
| | |
10.6 | | Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation and Equity Award Plan.(7) |
75
57
| | |
10.8 | | |
| | |
10.9 | | |
| | |
10.10 | ||
| ||
| | |
10.11 | | Golden Minerals Company 2013 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan.(10) |
| | |
10.12 | ||
| ||
| | |
10.13 | ||
| ||
| | |
10.14 | ||
| Form of Unit Agreement Pursuant to the 2013 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan. | |
| | |
10.15 | | At the Market Offering Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2016, between Golden Minerals Company and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC,as amended by the Amendment dated November 23, |
| |
58
10.16 | ||
| ||
| | |
10.17 | | |
| | |
10.18 | | |
| | |
10.19 | | |
| | |
21.1 | ||
| ||
| | |
23.1 | ||
|
76
| | |
23.2 | ||
| ||
| | |
23.3 | | |
| | |
31.1 | | |
| | |
31.2 | | |
| | |
32.1 | | |
| | |
96.1 | | |
| | |
96.2 | | |
| | |
101.INS | | Inline XBRL Instance Document* |
| | |
101.SCH | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document* |
| | |
101.CAL | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document* |
| | |
101.DEF | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Definition Document* |
59
| | |
101.LAB | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document* |
| | |
101.PRE | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document* |
|
| |
104 | | Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded in the Inline XBRL document) |
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 19, 2012. |
| (2) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 30, 2009. |
| (3) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 9, 2011. |
| (4) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Form S-1/A Registration Statement filed November 16, 2009. |
| (5) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 28, 2013. |
| (6) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2014. |
| (7) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 10, 2009. |
77
| (8) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 4, 2010. |
| (9) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 11, 2011. |
| (10) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 18, 2013. |
| (11) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 10, 2014. |
| (12) |
|
|
| Incorporated by reference to our Current |
| (13) |
|
|
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2016. |
| (14) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2016. |
| (15) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2016. |
| (16) |
|
| (17) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016. |
| (18) |
|
|
| Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 11, 2016. |
| (19) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2016. |
| (20) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2016. |
| (21) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2017 |
60
| (22) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 23, 2018. |
| (23) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2018. |
| (24) |
| Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on |
| (25) | Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2020. |
| (26) | Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 7, 2019. |
| (27) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 19, 2019. |
| (28) | Incorporated by reference to our Current report on Form 8-K filed on April 2, 2020. |
| (29) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2020. |
| (30) | Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 6, 2020. |
| (31) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2020. |
| (32) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 10, 2020. |
78
| (33) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 24, 2020. |
| (34) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2020. |
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
6179
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| ||
Dated: | GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY | |
| Registrant | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ WARREN M. REHN |
| | Warren M. Rehn |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | | Title | | Date | |||
| |
| |
| |||
| |||||||
/s/ WARREN M. REHN | | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| |||
Warren M. Rehn | | (Principal Executive Officer) | | | |||
| | | | | |||
/s/ ROBERT P. VOGELS | | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
| |||
Robert P. Vogels | | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | | | |||
| | | | | |||
/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGER | | Chairman of the Board of Directors | |
| |||
Jeffrey G. Clevenger | | | | | |||
| | | | | |||
/s/ W. DURAND EPPLER | | Director | |
| |||
W. Durand Eppler | | | | | |||
| | | | | |||
/s/ DEBORAH J. FRIEDMAN | | Director | | March 23, 2022 | |||
Deborah J. Friedman | | | | | |||
| | | | | |||
/s/ KEVIN R. MORANO | | Director | |
| |||
Kevin R. Morano | | | | | |||
| | | | | |||
/s/ TERRY M. PALMER | | Director | |
| |||
Terry M. Palmer | | | | | |||
| | | | | |||
/s/ ANDREW N. PULLAR | | Director | |
| |||
Andrew N. Pullar | | | | | |||
| | | | | |||
/s/ DAVID H. WATKINS | | Director | |
| |||
David H. Watkins | | | | | |||
6280
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEX
| ||
| | Page |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Plante & Moran, PLLC, Denver, Colorado, PCAOB ID 166) | |
|
| | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, | | F-4 |
| | |
| F-5 | |
| | |
| F-6 | |
| | |
| F-7 | |
| | |
| F-8 |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the ShareholdersStockholders and Board of Directors of
Golden Minerals Company
Golden, Colorado
OPINION ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Golden Minerals Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows, for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
BASIS FOR OPINION
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
/s/ EKS&H LLLP
March 1, 2018
Denver, Colorado
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Golden Minerals Company
Golden, Colorado
OPINION ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Golden Minerals Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, and comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the yearyears in the two-year period ended December 31, 2018,2021 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the yearyears in the two-year period ended December 31, 20182021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
BASIS FOR OPINION
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit.audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our auditaudits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our auditaudits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Mineral Resources and Asset Retirement Obligations —Refer to Note 11 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
F-2
Estimates of mineral resources, combined with future mine plans, are used to determine mine closure dates utilized in recording the fair value of asset retirement obligations. Since the asset retirement liability represents the present value of the expected future cash outlays, a significant change in mineral resources can impact mine lives, plans and extensions which in turn, could have a substantial effect on the recorded liability. The Company performs an in-depth evaluation of its mineral resource estimates by mine on a periodic basis, in addition to routine assessments. The determination of mineral resources requires management, with the support of management’s experts, to make significant estimates and assumptions related to key inputs including the plan for the production of mineral resources and ultimate mine closure (collectively “mineral resource inputs”). Changes in any of the judgments or assumptions related to the mineral resource inputs can have a significant impact with respect to the valuation of asset retirement obligations. The Company’s asset retirement obligation balance was $3.6 million as of December 31, 2021.
Given the significant judgments and assumptions made by management to estimate mineral resources and the sensitivity of changes to mineral resource inputs on the Company’s recorded asset retirement obligations, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s judgments and estimates related to the mineral resource inputs required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort.
How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to management’s significant judgments and assumptions related to mineral resources and the related mine closure dates included the following, among others:
| ● | We obtained an understanding of management’s process to develop their estimate of mineral resources and the related mine closure dates and tested the accuracy of key data used in their estimation process. We also gained an understanding of the design of key controls used by management to develop their estimate. |
| ● |
|
| ● | We | |||
| ||||
| estimate of the credit-adjusted-risk-free rate based on the mineral resource inputs. |
| ● | We performed sensitivity analysis around the significant assumptions used in the valuation of the asset retirement obligation. |
| ● | We evaluated the Company’s calculation of the changes in asset retirement obligations and compared significant assumptions to other sources of audit evidence. |
| ● | We also evaluated the adequacy of the Company’s disclosures in Note 11 in relation to the Company’s asset retirement obligation. |
/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.
Denver, Colorado
March 23, 2022
F-3
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
(Expressed in United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
|
| (in thousands, except share data) |
| ||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 5) |
| $ | 3,293 |
| $ | 3,250 |
|
Short-term investments (Note 5) |
|
| 330 |
|
| 238 |
|
Lease receivables |
|
| 481 |
|
| 314 |
|
Inventories, net (Note 7) |
|
| 229 |
|
| 242 |
|
Value added tax receivable, net (Note 8) |
|
| 14 |
|
| 148 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets (Note 6) |
|
| 1,188 |
|
| 745 |
|
Total current assets |
|
| 5,535 |
|
| 4,937 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 9) |
|
| 7,109 |
|
| 8,140 |
|
Total assets |
| $ | 12,644 |
| $ | 13,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities (Note 10) |
| $ | 1,702 |
| $ | 1,556 |
|
Deferred revenue, current (Note 16) |
|
| 293 |
|
| 293 |
|
Other current liabilities (Note 10) |
|
| 12 |
|
| 9 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
| 2,007 |
|
| 1,858 |
|
Asset retirement and reclamation liabilities (Note 11) |
|
| 2,683 |
|
| 2,495 |
|
Deferred revenue, non-current (Note 16) |
|
| 307 |
|
| 600 |
|
Other long term liabilities |
|
| 10 |
|
| 43 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
| 5,007 |
|
| 4,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity (Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 95,620,796 and 91,929,709 shares issued and outstanding respectively |
|
| 955 |
|
| 919 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
| 517,806 |
|
| 516,284 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
| (511,124) |
|
| (509,082) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
| — |
|
| (40) |
|
Shareholders' equity |
|
| 7,637 |
|
| 8,081 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
| $ | 12,644 |
| $ | 13,077 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | December 31, | | ||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
| | (in thousands, except share data) |
| ||||
Assets | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 3) | | $ | 12,229 | | $ | 9,704 | |
Short-term investments (Note 3) | | | 67 | | | 79 | |
Lease receivables | |
| — | |
| 72 | |
Inventories, net (Note 5) | |
| 1,573 | |
| 284 | |
Value added tax receivable, net (Note 6) | |
| 1,290 | |
| 45 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets (Note 4) | | | 1,145 | | | 1,130 | |
Total current assets | |
| 16,304 | |
| 11,314 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 8) | |
| 6,627 | |
| 5,520 | |
Other long term assets (Note 9) | |
| 747 | |
| 1,472 | |
Total assets | | $ | 23,678 | | $ | 18,306 | |
| | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Equity | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities (Note 10) | | $ | 3,381 | | $ | 1,318 | |
Deferred revenue (Note 8) | | | 1,469 | | | 535 | |
Other current liabilities (Note 12) | |
| 721 | |
| 667 | |
Total current liabilities | |
| 5,571 | |
| 2,520 | |
Asset retirement and reclamation liabilities (Note 11) | |
| 3,569 | |
| 3,166 | |
Other long term liabilities (Note 12) | |
| 353 | |
| 648 | |
Total liabilities | |
| 9,493 | |
| 6,334 | |
| | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Equity (Note 15) | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $.01 par value, 350,000,000 shares authorized; 162,804,612 and 157,512,652 shares issued and outstanding respectively | |
| 1,628 | |
| 1,575 | |
Additional paid in capital | |
| 540,518 | |
| 536,263 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (527,961) | |
| (525,866) | |
Shareholders' equity | |
| 14,185 | |
| 11,972 | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 23,678 | | $ | 18,306 | |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | ||||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
| | (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||
Revenue: | | | | | | |
Sale of metals (Note 16) | | $ | 25,596 | | $ | — |
Oxide plant lease (Notes 7, 17) | | | — | | | 5,637 |
Total revenue | | | 25,596 | | | 5,637 |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | |
Cost of metals sold (exclusive of depreciation shown below) (Note 16) | | | (13,311) | | | — |
Oxide plant lease costs (Note 17) | |
| — | |
| (1,988) |
Exploration expense | |
| (5,260) | |
| (4,954) |
El Quevar project expense | |
| (342) | |
| (618) |
Velardeña care and maintenance costs | |
| (1,409) | |
| (1,163) |
Administrative expense | |
| (4,821) | |
| (3,651) |
Stock based compensation | |
| (1,593) | |
| (859) |
Reclamation expense | |
| (262) | |
| (249) |
Other operating income (expense), net | |
| 547 | |
| 7 |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| (611) | |
| (962) |
Total costs and expenses | |
| (27,062) | |
| (14,437) |
Loss from operations | |
| (1,466) | |
| (8,800) |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | |
Interest and other expense, net (Note 18) | |
| (373) | |
| (132) |
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions | |
| 206 | |
| (106) |
Total other income (loss) | | | (167) | | | (238) |
Loss from operations before income taxes | |
| (1,633) | |
| (9,038) |
Income taxes (Note 14) | | | (462) | | | (48) |
Net Loss | | $ | (2,095) | | $ | (9,086) |
Net income (loss) per common share — basic | | | | | | |
Loss | | $ | (0.01) | | $ | (0.07) |
Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - basic (1) | | | 161,942,970 | |
| 131,774,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
|
| (in thousands except per share data) |
| ||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide plant lease (Note 16) |
| $ | 7,217 |
| $ | 6,691 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxide plant lease costs (Note 16) |
|
| (2,289) |
|
| (2,189) |
|
Exploration expense |
|
| (3,909) |
|
| (3,091) |
|
El Quevar project expense |
|
| (1,266) |
|
| (822) |
|
Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance costs |
|
| (1,889) |
|
| (1,589) |
|
Administrative expense |
|
| (3,355) |
|
| (3,512) |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
| (226) |
|
| (296) |
|
Reclamation expense |
|
| (210) |
|
| (196) |
|
Other operating income, net (Notes 8 and 9) |
|
| 5,138 |
|
| 2,093 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| (1,171) |
|
| (952) |
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
| (9,177) |
|
| (10,554) |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
| (1,960) |
|
| (3,863) |
|
Other income and (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other (expense) income, net (Note 17) |
|
| 112 |
|
| 37 |
|
Loss on foreign currency |
|
| (84) |
|
| (53) |
|
Total other income (loss) |
|
| 28 |
|
| (16) |
|
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes |
|
| (1,932) |
|
| (3,879) |
|
Income tax |
|
| (13) |
|
| (13) |
|
Net income (loss) |
| $ | (1,945) |
| $ | (3,892) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities (Note 5) |
|
| — |
|
| (95) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
| $ | (1,945) |
| $ | (3,987) |
|
Net income (loss) per common share — basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss |
| $ | (0.02) |
| $ | (0.04) |
|
Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - basic (1) |
|
| 94,003,165 |
|
| 90,468,606 |
|
(1) | Potentially dilutive shares have not been included because to do so would be anti-dilutive |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Expressed in United States dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Additional | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Paid-in | | Accumulated | | Total | ||||||
| | Shares | | Amount | | Capital | | Deficit | | Equity | ||||
| | (in thousands except share data) | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2019 | | 106,734,279 | | $ | 1,067 | | $ | 521,314 | | $ | (516,780) | | $ | 5,601 |
Stock compensation accrued and restricted stock awards granted (Note 15) | | 300,000 | | | 3 | | | 856 | | | — | | | 859 |
Shares issued under the at-the-market offering agreement, net (Note 15) | | 823,452 | | | 9 | | | 214 | | | — | | | 223 |
Shares issued under the Lincoln Park commitment purchase agreement, net (Note 15) | | 900,000 | | | 9 | | | 207 | | | — | | | 216 |
Subscription agreement (Note 15) | | 4,719,207 | | | 47 | | | 898 | | | — | | | 945 |
2020 Offering and private placement transaction (Note 15) | | 15,000,000 | | | 150 | | | 2,561 | | | — | | | 2,711 |
Public offering (Note 15) | | 20,535,714 | | | 205 | | | 7,748 | | | — | | | 7,953 |
Warrants exercised (Note 15) | | 8,500,000 | | | 85 | | | 2,465 | | | — | | | 2,550 |
Net loss | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (9,086) | | | (9,086) |
Balance, December 31, 2020 | | 157,512,652 | | $ | 1,575 | | $ | 536,263 | | $ | (525,866) | | $ | 11,972 |
Stock compensation accrued and restricted stock awards granted (Note 15) | | 335,000 | | | 3 | | | 1,590 | | | — | | | 1,593 |
Shares issued under the at-the-market offering agreement, net (Note 15) | | 1,856,960 | | | 19 | | | 1,681 | | | — | | | 1,700 |
Warrants exercised (Note 15) | | 3,100,000 | | | 31 | | | 984 | | | — | | | 1,015 |
Net loss | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,095) | | | (2,095) |
Balance, December 31, 2021 | | 162,804,612 | | $ | 1,628 | | $ | 540,518 | | $ | (527,961) | | $ | 14,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accumulated |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Additional |
|
|
|
| Other |
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Common Stock |
| Paid-in |
| Accumulated |
| Comprehensive |
| Total |
| |||||||
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Capital |
| Deficit |
| Income (loss) |
| Equity |
| |||||
|
| (in thousands except share data) |
| |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2016 |
| 89,020,041 |
| $ | 889 |
| $ | 495,455 |
| $ | (488,037) |
| $ | 55 |
| $ | 8,362 |
|
Cumulative adjustment related to change in accounting principle (Note 4) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 19,046 |
|
| (17,148) |
|
| — |
|
| 1,898 |
|
Adjusted balance at January 1, 2017 |
| 89,020,041 |
| $ | 889 |
| $ | 514,501 |
| $ | (505,185) |
| $ | 55 |
| $ | 10,260 |
|
Stock compensation accrued and shares issued for vested stock awards |
| 200,000 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 196 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 197 |
|
Shares issued under the at-the-market offering agreement, net (Note 15) |
| 1,024,392 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 671 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 681 |
|
Consideration shares sold to Hecla, net (Notes 15 and 16) |
| 1,811,015 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 912 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 930 |
|
Cancellation of treasury shares (Note 15) |
| (125,739) |
|
| 1 |
|
| (1) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Deemed dividend on warrants (Note 4) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 5 |
|
| (5) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Unrealized loss on marketable equity securities, net of tax |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (95) |
|
| (95) |
|
Net loss |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (3,892) |
|
| — |
|
| (3,892) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2017 |
| 91,929,709 |
| $ | 919 |
| $ | 516,284 |
| $ | (509,082) |
| $ | (40) |
| $ | 8,081 |
|
Cumulative adjustment related to change in accounting principle (Note 4) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (89) |
|
| 40 |
|
| (49) |
|
Adjusted balance at January 1, 2018 |
| 91,929,709 |
| $ | 919 |
| $ | 516,284 |
| $ | (509,171) |
| $ | — |
| $ | 8,032 |
|
Stock compensation accrued and shares issued for vested stock awards |
| 537,279 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 312 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 316 |
|
Registered direct purchase agreement, net (Note 15) |
| 3,153,808 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 1,202 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 1,234 |
|
Deemed dividend on warrants (Note 4) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 8 |
|
| (8) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Net loss |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (1,945) |
|
| — |
|
| (1,945) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2018 |
| 95,620,796 |
| $ | 955 |
| $ | 517,806 |
| $ | (511,124) |
| $ | — |
| $ | 7,637 |
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year Ended |
| ||||
|
| December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
|
| (in thousands) |
| ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities (Note 18) |
| $ | (5,711) |
| $ | (1,630) |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
| 5,097 |
|
| 762 |
|
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment |
|
| (152) |
|
| (81) |
|
Net cash from investing activities |
| $ | 4,945 |
| $ | 681 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
| 809 |
|
| 1,611 |
|
Net cash from financing activities |
| $ | 809 |
| $ | 1,611 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
| 43 |
|
| 662 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
| 3,250 |
|
| 2,588 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
| $ | 3,293 |
| $ | 3,250 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | ||||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
| | (in thousands) |
| ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Net cash from (used in) operating activities (Note 19) | | $ | 1,414 | | $ | (9,484) | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of assets | |
| 17 | |
| 525 | |
Acquisition of short-term investments | | | — | | | (59) | |
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment | |
| (1,620) | |
| (470) | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (1,603) | | $ | (4) | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs | |
| 2,714 | |
| 14,599 | |
Proceeds from related party loan (Note 23) | | | — | | | 1,000 | |
Payment of related party loan (Note 23) | | | — | | | (1,000) | |
Net cash from financing activities | | $ | 2,714 | | $ | 14,599 | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | |
| 2,525 | |
| 5,111 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | |
| 9,704 | |
| 4,593 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 12,229 | | $ | 9,704 | |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
1. | Nature of Operations |
The Company is a mining company, holding a 100% interest in the Rodeo property in Durango State, Mexico (the “Rodeo Property”), a 100% interest in the Velardeña and Chicago precious metals mining properties and associated oxide and sulfide processing plants in the state of Durango, Mexico (the “Velardeña Properties”). During November 2015, a 100% interest in the Company suspended miningEl Quevar advanced exploration silver property in the province of Salta, Argentina, which is subject to the terms of the April 9, 2020 earn-in agreement (the “Earn-in Agreement”) pursuant to which Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”) has the option to earn a 70% interest in the El Quevar project (see Note 8), and sulfide processing activities at itsa diversified portfolio of precious metals and other mineral exploration properties located primarily in or near historical precious metals producing regions of Mexico, Argentina and Nevada. The Rodeo Property, Velardeña Properties in order to conserveand the asset untilEl Quevar advanced exploration property are the Company is able to develop mining and processing plans that at then current prices for silver and gold indicate a sustainable positive operating margin (defined as revenues less costs of sales) or the Company is able to locate, acquire and develop alternative mineral sources that could be economically mined and transported to the Velardeña Properties for processing. The Company has placed the mine and sulfide processing plant on care and maintenance to enable a re-start of either the mine or mill when mining and processing plans and metals prices support a cash positive outlook. The Company incurred approximately $1.9 million and $1.6 million in care and maintenance costs for years ended December 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. On an ongoing basis, the Company expects to incur approximately $0.4 million in quarterly care and maintenance costs while mining and processing remain suspended.Company’s only material properties.
The Company has retained a core group of employeesis primarily focused on mining operations at the VelardeñRodeo Property as well as further studies of a Properties, most of whom have been assigned to operate and provide administrative supportrestart plan for the oxide plant, which is leasedVelardeña mine, including use of bio-oxidation to a subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company (“Hecla”) and not affected byimprove the shutdown. The retained employees also include an exploration group and an operations and administrative group to continue to advance the Company’s plans in Mexico, oversee corporate compliance activities, and to maintain and safeguard the longer term value of the Velardeña Properties assets.
The Velardeña oxide plant began processing material for Hecla in mid-December 2015, and the Company recorded net operating margin under the lease of approximately $4.9 million in 2018. On March 24, 2017, Hecla exercised its right to extend the lease through December 31, 2018. On August 2, 2017, the Company granted Hecla an additional option, to extend the lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 in exchange for a $1.0 million cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock, issued at par at a price of $0.55 per share, based on an undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price (see Note 15). On October 1, 2018, Hecla exercised this option to extend the lease through December 31, 2020. Hecla has the right to terminate the lease with 120 days’ notice.
payable gold recovery. The Company remainsis also focused on evaluating(i) advancing the El Quevar exploration property in Argentina through the Earn-in Agreement with Barrick and searching(ii) continuing to evaluate and search for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near termnear-term prospects of mining, and particularly for properties within reasonable haulage distances of our processing plants at the Velardeña Properties. The Company is also focused on advancing our El Quevar exploration property in Argentina and on advancing selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 12 properties, located primarily in Mexico. The Company is also reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico.
The Company began mining activities at the Rodeo Property during December 2020 and began processing mined material from Rodeo at the Velardeña plant in January 2021. The employees at the Rodeo and Velardeña Properties, in addition to those that operate the plant that processes the Rodeo mined material, include an operations group, an administrative group and an exploration group to continue to advance the Company’s plans in Mexico and to provide oversight for corporate compliance activities as well as maintaining and safeguarding the longer-term value of the Velardeña Properties assets.
The Company is considered an exploration stage companyissuer under the criteria set forth by the SEC under Regulation SK subpart 1300 (“S-K 1300”) as the Company has not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7, at the Velardeña Properties, or any of the Company’s other properties. As a result, and in accordance with GAAP for exploration stage companies, all expenditures for exploration and evaluation of the Company’s properties are expensed as incurred. As such, the Company’s financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of mining companies that do have proven and probable mineral reserves. Such companies would typically capitalize certain development costs including infrastructure development and mining activities to access the ore. The capitalized costs would be amortized on a units-of-production basis as reserves are mined. The amortized costs are typically allocated to inventory and eventually to cost of sales as the inventories are sold. As the Company does not have proven and probable mineral reserves, substantially all expenditures at the Company’s Rodeo property and the Velardeña Properties for mine construction activity, as well as operating costs associated with the mill facilities, and for items that do not have a readily identifiable market value apart from the mineralized material, have
F-8
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
been expensed as incurred. Such costs are charged to cost of metals sold or project expense during the period depending on the nature of the costs. Certain of the costs may be reflected in inventories prior to the sale of the product. The term “mineralized material” as used herein, although permissible under SEC Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards. The Company cannot be certain that any deposits at the Velardeña Properties or any other exploration propertyof its properties will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7S-K 1300 compliant “reserves”.
At December 31, 2018, the Company’s aggregate cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.3 million, equal to the $3.3 million in similar assets held at December 31, 2017. The December 31, 2018 balance is due in part from the following expenditures and cash inflows for the year ended December 31, 2018. Expenditures totaled $10.8 million from the following:
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foregoing expenditures were offset by cash inflows of $10.8 million from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the $3.3 million cash balance at December 31, 2018, the Company expects to receive approximately $4.6 million in net operating margin from the lease of the oxide plant during the next twelve-month period ending December 31, 2019. In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2018 the Company received approximately $0.2 million
F-9
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
from the sale of our common stock under the LPC Program. The Company’s currently budgeted expenditures during the twelve months ending December 31, 2019 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the Company spends the amounts described above, it would end 2019 with a cash balance of approximately zero. However, the Company does not intend to allow its cash balance to drop below acceptable levels. Therefore, during 2019 the Company intends to take appropriate actions, which may include sales of certain of the Company’s nonstrategic exploration assets, reductions to the Company’s currently budgeted level of spending, and/or raising additional equity capital through sales under the ATM Program, LPC Program or otherwise.
The actual amount of cash that we receive or the expenditures that the Company incurs during the year ended 2019 and the projected cash balance at December 31, 2019 may vary significantly from the amounts specified above and will depend on a number of factors, including variations from anticipated care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties and costs for continued exploration, project assessment, and development at the Companys’ other exploration properties, including El Quevar. Moreover, revenues from the oxide plant lease may be less than anticipated, which would require further actions on the Company’s part in order to maintain sufficient cash balances at year end.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company’s continuing long-term operations are dependent upon its ability to secure sufficient funding and to generate future profitable operations. The underlying value and recoverability of the amounts shown as property, plant and equipment in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are dependent on its ability to generate positive cash flows from operations and to continue to fund exploration and development activities that would lead to profitable mining activities or to generate proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating future profitable operations or securing additional funding in the future on terms acceptable to the Company or at all. The Company believes the continuing cash flow from the lease of the oxide plant, use of the ATM Program and LPC Program, and the potential for additional asset dispositions make it probable that the Company will have sufficient cash to meet its financial obligations and continue its business strategy beyond one year from the filing of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2018.
3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
F-10F-8
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to mineralized materialmineral resources and related future metals prices that are the basis for future cash flow estimates utilized in impairment calculations; depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations; environmental reclamation and closure obligations; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets and the fair value of financial instruments. The Company based its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The policies adopted, considered by management to be significant, are summarized as follows:
a.Basisa.Basis of consolidation
All of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries are 100% owned and as such the Company does not have a noncontrolling interest in any of its subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated at consolidation.
b.Translationb.Translation of foreign currencies
SubstantiallyThe Company’s revenue and external funding are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. Additionally, substantially all of the Company’s significant expenditures and sales are made inwith reference to U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the Company and its subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional and reporting currency.
c.Cashc.Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
d.Inventoriesd.Inventories
Materials and supplies inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Cost includes applicable taxes and freight. The Company routinely counts and evaluates its material and supplies to determine the existence of any obsolete stock that is subject to impairment.
e. Mining properties, exploration and development costs
The Company expenses general prospecting costs and the costs of acquiring and exploring unevaluated mineralmining properties. When and if a mineralmining property is determined to have proven and probable mineral reserves, subsequent development costs arewill be capitalized to mineral properties. For acquired mineralmining properties with proven and probable mineral reserves, the Company capitalizeswill capitalize acquisition costs and subsequent development costs. When mineraland if mining properties are developed and operations commence, capitalized costs arewill be charged to operations using the units-of-production method over proven and probable reserves. Upon abandonment or sale of a mineralmining property, all capitalized costs relating to the specific property are written off in the period abandoned or sold and a gain or loss is recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.Operations.
As discussed in Note 1, the Company is considered an exploration stage company under the criteria set forth by the SEC since it has not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probablemineral reserves at any of the Company’s properties. As such, during the periods prior to November 2016 when the Company suspended mining and processing activities, the
F-11F-9
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Company expensed costs as incurred related to extraction of mineralized materialdoes not have proven and probable mineral reserves, substantially all expenditures at the Velardeña Properties. The Company established a cost basis for the mineralized material atCompany’s Rodeo property and the Velardeña Properties for mine construction activity, as well as operating costs associated with the mill facilities, and for items that do not have a result of purchase accounting for the Company’s business combination transaction with ECU Silver Mining Inc. (“ECU”) in September 2011, the transaction pursuant to which the Company acquired the Velardeña Properties. Mineral properties acquired in the ECU merger were recorded at estimated fairreadily identifiable market value based on valuations performed with the assistance of an independent appraisal firm and a minerals engineering company. Although the Company has not demonstrated the existence of proven and probable reserves, and the Company has not completed a pre-feasibility economic assessment, the Company had established the existence of mineralized material that was used in assigning value to mineral properties for purchase accounting purposes. The subsequent extraction of this mineralized material has provided a reasonable basis for the calculation of units-of-production depreciation for the cost basis inapart from the mineral properties.resources, have been expensed as incurred. Such costs are charged to cost of metals sold or project expense during the period depending on the nature of the costs. Certain of the costs may be reflected in inventories prior to the sale of the product.
On a quarterly basis the Company evaluates its exploration properties to determine if they meet the Company’s minimum requirements for continued evaluation. The rights to the properties that do not meet the minimum requirements are relinquished and the carrying values, if any, are written off and reflected in “Other operating income, net” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.Operations.
f.Property,f.Property, plant and equipment and long lived asset impairment
Buildings are depreciated using the straight–line method over the estimated useful lives of 30 to 40 years or the life of the mine whichever is shorter. Mining equipment and machinery, excluding the plant, are depreciated using the straight-line method over useful lives of three to eight years or the lease period, whichever is shorter. Mineral properties and the plant are depreciated using units of production based on estimated mineralized material.mineral resources. Other furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to five years.
As discussed above, the Company does not have any properties with proven or probable mineral reserves.
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and per the guidance of ASC 360 the Company assesses the recoverability of its property, plant and equipment, including goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of estimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related asset, impairment is considered to exist. The related impairment loss is measured by comparing estimated future net cash flows on a discounted basis or by comparing other market indicators to the carrying amount of the asset.
The Company evaluated its remaining long lived assets at December 31, 20172021 and 2018,2020, and determined that no0 impairment was required.incurred.
g.Assetg.Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company records asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) in accordance with ASC 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (“ASC 410”), which establishes a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. According to ASC 410, the fair value of an ARO is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. An offsetting asset retirement cost (“ARC”) is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets with which it is associated and depreciated over the useful life of the asset (see Note 11).
The Company prepares estimates of the timing and amount of expected cash flows when an ARO is incurred. The fair value of the ARO is measured by discounting the expected cash flows using a discount rate that reflects the credit
F-12
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
adjusted risk-free rate of interest. The Company records the fair value of an ARO when it is incurred and layer adjustments of the ARO are recorded as an adjustment to the corresponding ARC. The ARO is adjusted to reflect the passage of time (accretion cost) calculated by applying the discount rate implicit in the initial fair value measurement to the beginning-of-period carrying amount of the ARO. The Company records accretion costs to expense as incurred.
F-10
h.RevenueGOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
h.Value Added Taxes
The Company pays value added tax (“VAT”) in Mexico as well as other countries, primarily related to the Rodeo operation and exploration projects. For exploration projects, the amounts are generally charged to expense as incurred because of the uncertainty of recoverability. For the Rodeo operation, the Company records VAT paid as a recoverable asset, which appears in “Value added tax receivable, net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Mexico law allows for certain VAT payments to be recovered through ongoing applications for refunds.
i.Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes “Revenue from the Sale of Metals” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations following the guidance of ASC 606. Under the terms of the Company’s agreement with its customer, title passes and revenue is recognized by the Company when the contractual performance obligations of the parties are completed, generally at the time a provisional or final payment is made. Refining and transport costs, deducted from the final payments made, are treated as third party costs incurred after the transfer of control on provisional sales, and are therefore netted against revenue on an accrual basis.
The Company recognizes oxide plant lease fees and reimbursements for labor, utility and other costs as "Revenue"Revenue from Oxide plant lease"lease" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss following the guidance of ASC 606 regarding "income statement characterization of reimbursements received for "out-of-pocket" expenses incurred" and "reporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent". ASC 606842, which supports recording as gross revenue fees received for the reimbursement of expenses incurred directly by the Company in performing its obligations under the lease in situations where the recipient isentity has control over the primary obligor and has certain discretion in the incurrence of the reimbursable expense.specific goods or services transferred to a customer as a principal versus as an agent. The actual costs incurred for the reimbursed direct labor utility and otherutility costs are reported as "“Oxide plant lease costs"costs” in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.Operations. The Company recognizes lease fees during the period asthe fees are earned per the terms of the lease (see Note 16)17).
iStockjStock compensation
Stock based compensation costs are recognized per the guidance of ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), using a graded vesting attribution method whereby costs are recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award (see Note 15). Stock grants are valued at their grant date at fair value which in the case of options requires the use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Per ASC 718 the grants may be classified as equity grants or liability grants depending on the terms of the grant.
j.Netk.Leases
Effective January 1, 2019 the Company adopted ASU 2016-02 and ASU No. 2018-11, which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than twelve months. Leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.
l.Net income (loss) per Share of Common Stock
Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to holders of the Company’s Common Stock by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue Common Stock were exercised or converted into Common Stock.
F-11
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
At December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, all potentially dilutive shares relating to warrants and stock compensation awards were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because to include them would have been anti-dilutive.
k.Comprehensivem.Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as all changes in equity (deficit), exclusive of transactions with stockholders, such as capital investments. Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and changes in certain assets and liabilities that are reported directly in equity. For the year ended December 31, 2017 Comprehensive loss included the change in the market value of available for sale securities and is reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
n.Income (Loss).Taxes
As the result of a 2018 change in accounting principle, discussed in Note 4, the Company now records the changes in readily determinable fair values of equity investments through net income. Accordingly, no amounts were recorded to Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
F-13
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
l.Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), on a tax jurisdictional basis. The Company files United States and certain other foreign country income tax returns, and pays taxes reasonably determined to be due. The tax rules and regulations in these countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation. The Company’s income tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities and in connection with such examinations, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain tax rules within the country involved. In accordance with ASC 740, the Company identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions, and recognizes the impact of uncertain tax positions for which there is a less than more-likely-than-not probability of the position being upheld when reviewed by the relevant taxing authority. Such positions are deemed to be unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding liability is established on the balance sheet.
The Company classifies income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense.
m.Recentlyo.Recently Adopted Standards
During the first quarter 20182020 the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”), which amended its accounting treatment for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of certain financial assets. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments that have a readily determinable fair value to be measured at fair value through net income. Previously, entities would recognize changes in fair value of available-for-sale equity securities in other comprehensive income and would recognize in net income impairment losses that were other-than-temporary. There will no longer be an available-for-sale classification (with changes in fair value reported in other comprehensive income) for equity securities with readily determinable fair values. The Company recognized retrospectively the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2016-01 (see Note 4).
During the first quarter 2018 the Company adopted ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU 2016-08”), which clarifies principal versus agent when another party, along with the entity, is involved in providing a good or service to a customer. Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requires an entity to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (i.e., the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (i.e., the entity is an agent). The adoption of ASU 2016-08 during the first quarter 2018, did not result in a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations or the requirement for retrospective reporting.
During the first quarter 2018 the Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”) which was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in May 2014. The Company also adopted ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income (Subtopic 310-20)” (“ASU 2017-05”), which was issued by the FASB in February 2017 clarifying the scope of Subtopic 610-20, which was originally issued as part of ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. In addition, the guidance requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized and the related cash flows. The Company has elected the modified retrospective method of adopting ASU 2014 (see Note 4).
In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part 1) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral
F-14
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2017-11”). Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of future equity offerings. An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified as equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities. ASU 2017-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-11 during the interim period ended September 30, 2017 (see Note 4).
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions including accounting for income taxes and classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures and minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. For the Company, ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2017 did not materially change the Company’s previous accounting methods and therefore did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operation.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”). ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 in 2017 did not materially change the Company’s previous accounting methods and therefore did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operation.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015‑11”). ASU 2015-11 affects reporting entities that measure inventory using first-in, first-out or average cost. ASU 2015‑11 requires that inventory be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-11 in 2017 did not materially change the Company’s previous accounting methods and therefore did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operation.
n.Recently Issued Pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 modifies the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the currently used incurred loss methodology, which will result in the more timely recognition of losses. ASU 2016-13 will be effective for the Company as of January 1, 2020. As the Company’s principleprincipal credit risk is related to its Lease Receivables the Company does not expect the adoption of this update todid not result in a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On April 12, 2021, the SEC published a statement relating to accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs). The SEC statement raised accounting and reporting considerations for all reporting entities that restrict the use of the exception under ASC 815-40-25-7 through 8 that allows for equity treatment, under certain conditions, for warrants that allow cash settlement in certain change of control transactions. The restriction put forth by the SEC would prevent equity treatment in cases where cash is received disproportionately between shareholders and warrant holders in such transactions. All of the outstanding warrants granted by the Company are recorded in equity at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 following the guidance established by ASC Topic 815-40. The Company’s warrants allow for the potential settlement in cash if certain extraordinary events are effected by the Company, including a 50% or greater change of control in the Company’s common stock. Since those events have been deemed to be within the Company’s control, the Company continues to apply equity treatment for these warrants.
F-12
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
p.Recently Issued Pronouncements
There were no new accounting pronouncements issued during 2021 that would affect the Company or have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
3. | Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments |
In February 2016,Of the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”), which will require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset$12.2 million reported as “Cash and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than twelve months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affectingcash equivalents” on the pattern of expense recognition in the income
F-15
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
statement. For a lessor, the accounting applied is largely unchanged from previous guidance. The new rules will be effective forCondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2021, the Company inhad approximately $153,000 that was unavailable for use due to a court order freezing the first quarterbank accounts of 2019. The Company does not anticipate early adoption. The Company currently leases administrative offices in the U.S. and in several foreign locations under lease agreements that typically exceed one year. Depending on the number of years remaining under such lease agreements the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that the Company would record under ASU 2016-2 could be material. In January 2019, the Company extended the office lease at its corporate headquarters in the U.S. Lease payments for base rent and common area maintenance are estimated to be approximately $0.9M from January 2019 through December 2024.
4. Change in Accounting Principle
Warrant Liability
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part 1) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2017-11”). Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round featuresCompany’s subsidiaries in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of future equity offerings. An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified in equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities. In the case where the exception from derivative accounting does not apply, warrants must be accounted for as a liability and recorded at fair value at the date of grant and re-valued at the end of each reporting period.
The September 2012 and 2014 warrants (see Note 15) include anti-dilution provisions characterized as down round features and were previously accounted for as liabilities, with the fair value of the warrant liabilities remeasured at each reporting date and the change in liabilities recorded as other non-operating income or loss. The Company had recorded a warrant liability of $1.5 million as of September 30, 2017 and reported a warrant derivative loss of $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 relating to the September 2012 and 2014 warrants prior to the change in accounting principle.
In addition, for freestanding equity-classified financial instruments, ASU 2017-11 also requires entities that present earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Certain equity transactions following the issuance of the September 2012 and 2014 warrants have triggered anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements resulting in additional warrant shares and a reduction to the original strike price of the warrants. ASU 2017-11 prescribes a method to measure the value of a deemed dividendMexico related to a triggering event by computinglawsuit, as further described in Note 20. The restrictions imposed on the difference in fair value between two instruments that have terms consistentsubsidiary’s bank accounts do not impact the Company’s ability to operate the Rodeo mine, which is held through a different Mexico subsidiary, or to continue with the actual instrument but that do not haveCompany’s evaluation plans for a down round feature, where the number of warrant shares and strike price of one instrument corresponds to the actual instrument before the triggering event and the number of warrant shares and strike pricepotential Velardeña mine restart or move forward with any of the Company’s other instrument corresponds to the actual instrument immediately after the triggering event. Following ASU 2017-11, for periods ending on or prior to December 31, 2016 the Company would have reduced its “Accumulated deficit” as reported on its Consolidated Balance Sheets by approximately $0.3 million related to prior triggering events. During the nine-month period ending September 30, 2017 the Company would have reduced its accumulated deficit by approximately $3,000 related to triggering events. During the year ending December 31, 2018 the Company reduced its accumulated deficit by approximately $8,000 related to triggering events.exploration programs in Mexico.
F-16
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Except for the down round features in the September 2012 and 2014 warrants, the warrants would have been classified in equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 and therefore qualify for the scope exception in ASU 2017-11. As permitted, the Company elected to adopt the accounting principles prescribed by ASU 2017-11 during the interim period ended September 30, 2017 and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment stemming from a change in accounting principle in its financial statements measured retrospectively to the beginning of 2017. The cumulative effect adjustment appears at the beginning of 2017 in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity. The results of operations for the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2017 reflect application of the change in accounting principle from the beginning of 2017. As noted above, the Company had previously reported a warrant derivative gain of $0.4 million during the nine-month period ending September 30, 2017. Because the Company has retroactively applied the change in accounting principle discussed above to the beginning of 2017, the Company is no longer reporting warrant derivative gains or losses for the September 2012 and 2014 warrants beginning in 2017.
Other Income Related to the Sale of Exploration Properties
During the first quarter 2018 the Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”) which was issued by the FASB” in May 2014. ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. In addition, the guidance requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized and the related cash flows. The Company has elected the modified retrospective method of initially adopting ASU 2014-09.
ASU 2014-09 requires, in certain instances, that transactions covered by ASC Topic 610, “Other Income” (“Topic 610”) follow the recognition, measurement and disclosure guidelines established by ASU 2014-09. The Company generally follows the guidance of Topic 610 with respect to the recognition of income from the farm-out or sale of exploration properties. As of the beginning of 2018, the Company had one open contract impacted by the adoption of ASU 2014-09, involving an option agreement under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santacruz”) may acquire the Company’s interest in certain nonstrategic mineral claims located in the Zacatecas Mining District, Zacatecas, Mexico (the “Zacatecas Properties”) for a series of payments totaling $1.5 million (Note 9). In applying ASU 2014-09, approximately $49,000 of the income recognized from the Santacruz transaction in the fourth quarter of 2017 would have been recognized in the first quarter of 2018. Accordingly, the Company has recognized retrospectively the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 by recording a negative adjustment to retained earnings of $49,000 at the beginning of 2018, included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, and recording $49,000 in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the period ended December 31, 2018. See Note 9 for a further description of the contract with Santacruz and the identification of performance obligations and other significant judgments used in applying the guidance of Topic 606 to the contract.
Available for Sale Securities
During the first quarter 2018 the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-01, which amended its accounting treatment for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of certain financial assets. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments that have readily determinable fair values to be measured at fair value through net income. Previously, entities would recognize changes in fair value of available-for-sale equity securities in other comprehensive income and would recognize in net income impairment losses that were other-than-temporary. There will no longer be an available-for-sale classification (with changes in fair value reported in other comprehensive income) for equity securities with readily determinable fair values. At December 31, 2017, the Company had equity securities classified as available-for-sale and
F-17
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
reported at fair value of $238,000, with cumulative unrealized losses of $40,000 recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has recognized the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2016-01 by recording a negative adjustment to retained earnings and other comprehensive income of $40,000 at the beginning of 2018, included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, and has recorded a gain of approximately $51,000 in “Interest and other income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the period ended December 31, 2018.
5.Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments include investments with maturities greater than three months, but not exceeding 12 months, or highly liquid investments with maturities greater than 12 months that the Company intends to liquidate during the next 12 months for working capital needs.
The following tables summarize the Company's short-term investments at December 31, 2018 2021
and 2017:December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
|
| | |
| Estimated |
| Carrying |
| ||||||||||||
December 31, 2021 | | Cost | | Fair Value | | Value |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Estimated |
| Carrying |
| ||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 |
| Cost |
| Fair Value |
| Value |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| (in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||
| | | (in thousands) | | ||||||||||||||||
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Trading securities |
| $ | 275 |
| $ | 330 |
| $ | 330 |
| | $ | 59 | | $ | 67 | | $ | 67 | |
Total trading securities |
|
| 275 |
|
| 330 |
|
| 330 |
| |
| 59 | |
| 67 | |
| 67 | |
Total short term |
| $ | 275 |
| $ | 330 |
| $ | 330 |
| | $ | 59 | | $ | 67 | | $ | 67 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale common stock |
| $ | 275 |
| $ | 238 |
| $ | 238 |
| ||||||||||
Total available for sale common stock |
|
| 275 |
|
| 238 |
|
| 238 |
| ||||||||||
Trading securities | | $ | 59 | | $ | 79 | | $ | 79 | | ||||||||||
Total trading securities | |
| 59 | |
| 79 | |
| 79 | | ||||||||||
Total short term |
| $ | 275 |
| $ | 238 |
| $ | 238 |
| | $ | 59 | | $ | 79 | | $ | 79 | |
The short-term investments at December 31, 2021, consist of 1,000,000 common shares of Fabled Silver Gold Corp. (“Fabled”), and 200,000 common shares of Fabled Copper Corp. The short-term investments at December 31, 2020, consist of 1,000,000 common shares of Fabled. Fabled is a junior mining company that entered into an option agreement with the Company to acquire the Company’s option to earn a 100% interest in the Santa Maria mining claims located in Chihuahua, Mexico (see Note 8). The common shares were issued to the Company as partial consideration per the terms of the option agreement. The Fabled Copper Corp. shares were received in a spin-off of assets from Fabled that occurred on December 21, 2020, to which all existing shareholders of Fabled were entitled.
F-13
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Credit Risk
The Company invests substantially all of its excess cash with high credit-quality financial institutions or in U.S. government or debt securities. Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to fulfill its performance obligations under the terms of a financial instrument. For cash and equivalents and investments, credit risk represents the carrying amount on the balance sheet. The Company mitigates credit risk for cash and equivalents and investments by placing its funds and investments with high credit-quality financial institutions, limiting the amount of exposure to each of the financial institutions, monitoring the financial condition of the financial institutions and investing only in government and corporate securities rated “investment grade” or better. The Company invests with financial institutions that maintain a net worth of not less than $1 billion and are members in good standing of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
4. | Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets |
F-18
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
6.Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | |||||||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, | ||||||||||
| | 2021 |
| 2020 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, | ||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
|
| 2017 |
| ||||||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
| | (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
Prepaid insurance |
| $ | 358 |
| $ | 362 |
| | $ | 575 | | $ | 571 | |
Deferred offering costs |
|
| 569 |
|
| 137 |
| |||||||
Recoupable deposits and other |
|
| 261 |
|
| 246 |
| |
| 570 | |
| 559 | |
|
| $ | 1,188 |
| $ | 745 |
| |||||||
| | $ | 1,145 | | $ | 1,130 | | |||||||
The deferred offeringDecember 31, 2021 recoupable deposits and other includes a receivable from Barrick for reimbursement of costs areof approximately $0.3 million related to the ATM ProgramEarn-in Agreement (see Note 8).
Recoupable deposits and other at December 31, 2020, includes $0.2 million related to a recoupable deposit paid to a contractor engaged in mining activities at the LPC Program, discussed in detail inRodeo property (see Note 15.9). The deposit was credited towards costs charged by the mining contractor evenly over the first four months of 2021.
5. | Inventories |
7.Inventories
Inventories at the Velardeña Properties were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
|
| (in thousands) |
| ||||
Material and supplies |
| $ | 229 |
| $ | 242 |
|
|
| $ | 229 |
| $ | 242 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | December 31, |
| ||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
| | (in thousands) | | ||||
Doré inventory | | $ | 446 | | $ | 0 | |
In-process inventory | |
| 668 | |
| 0 | |
Material and supplies | | $ | 459 | | $ | 284 | |
| | $ | 1,573 | | $ | 284 | |
The materialDoré and suppliesin-process inventories, recorded at book value, include approximately $21,000 of capitalized depreciation and amortization. Doré inventory at December 31, 20182021 consists of 626 payable ounces of gold and 20171,958 payable ounces of silver.
The materials and supplies inventories at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are primarily related to the Velardeña PropertiesRodeo operation and are reduced by a $0.3 million and $0.2 million obsolescence reserve.reserve, respectively.
F-14
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
8.ValueNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
6. Value added tax receivable, net
TheAt December 31, 2021, the Company has recorded a net value added tax (“VAT”) paid in Mexico andof $1.3 million, related to the Velardeña Properties and the Rodeo operation, as a recoverable asset.asset, which appears in “Value added tax receivable, net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Mexico law allows for certain VAT payments to be recovered from VAT collected fromthrough ongoing applications for refunds. The Company expects that the sale of products or rendering of services.current amounts will be recovered within a one-year period. At December 31, 2018,2021, the Company has also recorded approximately $30,000$0.5 million of VAT receivablepayable as a reduction to the VAT payablereceivable in Mexico, which appears in “Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2017 the Company received refunds of approximately $1.1 million from the government of Argentina for VAT payments made in that country during 2012 and 2013. Because of uncertainties relating to collectability of the taxesMexico. At December 31, 2020, the Company had recorded a full valuation allowance against the VAT receivable at the time the taxes were paid. The Company reported the $1.1 millionapproximately $45,000 of VAT refunds received during the year ended December 31, 2017 in “Other operating income” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. In February 2018, the Company received an additional approximately $138,000 of VAT refunds. At December 31, 2017, the Company reversed $138,000 of the valuation allowance and recorded a VAT receivable of $138,000 with a corresponding gain in “Other operating income” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company has remaining Argentina VAT refund claims totaling approximately $0.1 million. The Company cannot predict if or when it will receive these additional VAT refunds and accordingly has recorded a full valuation allowance against the remaining VAT refund claims. VAT.
F-19
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The Company has also paid VAT in Mexico as well as other countries, primarily related to exploration projects, which has been charged to expense as incurred because of the uncertainty of recoverability.
8.
9.Property, Plant
7. | Derivative at Fair Value |
On December 3, 2019 the Company entered into an amendment to the Velardeña oxide plant lease agreement (the “Hecla Lease”) with Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V. (“Hecla”), a Mexican corporation and Equipmentwholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company, reducing the variable per tonne fee contained in the lease agreement from $22.00 to $11.00. Under certain silver price and delivered ore head grade limits, the variable per tonne fee could be increased back to the previous $22.00 per tonne. Pursuant to ASC Topics 815-Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) and 842-Leases (“ASC 842”), arrangements with variable lease payments must be evaluated to assess whether they contain embedded derivatives. If embedded derivatives are not “clearly and closely related” to the lease contract, they must be bifurcated and accounted for separately from the host contract. The Company determined that the potential for the Company to receive an additional $11.00 variable per tonne fee if certain conditions relating to the silver price and delivered ore head grades are met does not qualify for the “clearly and closely related” exception, and as a result, the potential additional $11.00 variable per tonne fee constitutes a derivative that must be valued and accounted for apart from the host lease contract. Per the guidance of ASC 842, the Company determined that the amendment to the Hecla Lease constituted a modification that must be accounted for as a new lease commencing on December 2, 2019, the date the amendment was agreed upon by both parties. The Company treated the fair value of the derivative received at the time of the modification to the lease agreement as an upfront lease payment that was amortized over the remaining life of the lease on a straight line basis and recorded a “Derivativeat fair value” asset of approximately $0.2 Million on the Consolidated Balance Sheet related to the amended Hecla Lease. On July 7, 2020, the Company received notification from Hecla terminating the Hecla Lease, effective November 30, 2020, therefore, at December 31, 2020, the Company no longer recorded a derivative value related to the Hecla Lease.
For the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company recognized a reduction of $254,000 to “Revenue - plant lease” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to the change in the fair value of the derivative between December 31, 2019 and the termination of the Hecla Lease on November 30, 2020 (see Note 17). During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company also recognized approximately $180,000 “Revenue - plant lease” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations related to the amortization of deferred revenue.
F-15
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
8. | Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment, net
The components of property, plant, and equipment, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
|
| (in thousands) |
| ||||
Mineral properties |
| $ | 9,353 |
| $ | 9,352 |
|
Exploration properties |
|
| 2,518 |
|
| 2,518 |
|
Royalty properties |
|
| 200 |
|
| 200 |
|
Buildings |
|
| 4,278 |
|
| 4,246 |
|
Mining equipment and machinery |
|
| 16,024 |
|
| 15,989 |
|
Other furniture and equipment |
|
| 888 |
|
| 958 |
|
Asset retirement cost |
|
| 866 |
|
| 865 |
|
|
|
| 34,127 |
|
| 34,128 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
| (27,018) |
|
| (25,988) |
|
|
| $ | 7,109 |
| $ | 8,140 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | December 31, | | ||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
| | (in thousands) |
| ||||
Mineral properties | | $ | 9,353 | | $ | 9,353 | |
Exploration properties | | | 2,418 | | | 2,418 | |
Royalty properties | |
| 200 | |
| 200 | |
Buildings | |
| 3,806 | |
| 3,755 | |
Mining equipment and machinery | |
| 17,477 | |
| 16,135 | |
Other furniture and equipment | |
| 1,328 | |
| 890 | |
Construction in progress | | | — | | | 259 | |
Asset retirement cost | |
| 1,057 | |
| 948 | |
| |
| 35,639 | |
| 33,958 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization | |
| (29,012) | |
| (28,438) | |
| | $ | 6,627 | | $ | 5,520 | |
Equipment Related to the Oxide Plant LeaseEl Quevar Earn-In Agreement
Certain assets of the Company are related to the lease of the Velardeña oxide plant to Hecla (see Note 1). The net book value of the equipment involved in the lease was $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
Minera Indé Equipment Sale
In August 2016, the Company sold certain mining equipment consisting of two haul trucks, two scoop trams and a compressor to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of The Sentient Group (“Sentient”), for $687,000 (see Note 22). The equipment sold was excess equipment held at the Company’s Velardeña Properties that the Company did not expect to use. The Company received $69,000 or 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale, with the remaining $618,000 plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10% due in February 2017. With the approval of a Special Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors,On April 9, 2020, the Company and Minera Indé amendedseveral of its directly and indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into the original equipment sale on March 31, 2017Earn-in Agreement with Barrick, pursuant to includewhich Barrick has acquired an option (the “Option”) to earn a 70% interest in the saleCompany’s El Quevar project located in the Salta Province of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000 and extend the time for payment relatingArgentina. Pursuant to the original equipment sale. Upon executionterms of the amendmentEarn-in Agreement, in order to earn an undivided 70% interest in the El Quevar project, Barrick must: (A) incur a total of $10 million in work expenditures over a total of eight years ($0.5 million per year in years one and two, $1 million per year in years three, four and five, and $2 million per year in years six, seven and eight); (B) deliver to the Company received an additional paymenta National Instrument 43-101 compliant pre-feasibility study pursuant to the parameters set forth in the Earn-in Agreement; and (C) deliver a written notice to exercise the Option to the Company within the term of $100,000. The remaining principalthe Earn-in Agreement. Barrick may withdraw from the Earn-in Agreement at any time after spending a minimum of $1 million in work expenditures and interest balance, plus additional interest onupon providing 30 days’ notice to the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, was amended to be due in August 2017.Company. The Company recordedwill form a gain of $105,000 onnew entity (“NewCo”) that will hold the saleEl Quevar properties. Upon satisfaction of the additional equipment, included in “Other operating income, net”Earn-in conditions and exercise of the Option, NewCo will be 70% owned by Barrick and 30% owned by the Company. Funding of NewCo will be based on Barrick’s and the Company’s respective ownership and industry standard dilution mechanisms will apply in the accompanying Consolidated Statementscase of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, equalfunding shortfalls by either shareholder. As of December 31, 2021, Barrick had met the $1 million in work expenditures that would allow them to withdraw from the Earn-in Agreement. The carrying value of El Quevar as of December 31, 2021 is $2.3 million.
Sale of Santa Maria Property
On July 14, 2020, the Company entered into a binding letter of intent (“Letter of Intent”) with Fabled for a potential transaction pursuant to which Fabled would acquire the Company’s option to earn a 100% interest in the Santa Maria mining claims located in Chihuahua, Mexico (the “Option”). On December 4, 2020, the Company entered into a definitive option agreement (“Option Agreement”) to sell its option to Fabled. The period to exercise the Option (the “Exercise Period”) expires on December 4, 2022, unless extended by the parties under the terms of the Option Agreement. As consideration for the Option, Fabled (i) paid $500,000 in cash to the gross proceeds less the remaining basis in the equipment. On May 2, 2017,Company and issued to the Company received approximately $750,000 from Minera Indé as payment in full for the remaining balance due related to the equipment sale, including interest through that date.
1,000,000
F-20F-16
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Celaya Farm-out
In August 2016,shares of Fabled’s common stock (the “Closing Consideration”); (ii) paid $1,500,000 in cash to the Company through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, entered into an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiaryon the one year anniversary date following the closing of Electrum Group, LLC, a privately owned company (together “Electrum”), relatedthe Option Agreement; (iii) will pay $2,000,000 in cash to the Company’s Celaya exploration property in Mexico. The Company received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling at least $0.5 million inon the firsttwo year anniversary date following the closing of the agreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurredOption Agreement; and (iv) upon exercise of the Option, will grant the Company a 1% net smelter return royalty on the property since December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program. Electrum initially earnedMaria, Martia III, Maria II Frac. I, Santa Maria and Punto Com concessions (the “Concessions”). Pursuant to the right to acquire an undivided 60% interest in a joint venture company to be formed to hold the Celaya project by incurring exploration expenditures totaling at least $2.5 millionOption Agreement, during the initial first three yearsExercise Period, Fabled is obligated to pay to each of the agreement. Electrum would serve as managerowners of the joint venture. Prior to subsequent amendmentsConcessions any remaining required payments due to the agreement,owners pursuant to the Company would have been allowed to maintain a 40% interest invarious underlying option agreements between the Celaya project, following the initial earn-in period, by contributing its pro-rata share of an additional $2.5 million in exploration or development expenditures incurred over a second three-year period.
In February 2018,owners and the Company, and Electrum amendedto make all payments and perform all other requirements needed to maintain the Celaya earn-in agreement to permit Electrum to earn, at its option, an incremental 20% interestConcessions in the Celaya project in exchange for a paymentgood standing. As of $1.0 million. Following the amendment, Electrum could have increased its total interest in the project to 80% by contributing 100% of the $2.5December 31, 2021, there was approximately $0.1 million of additional expenditures required inconcession payments remaining to be paid by Fabled over the second three-year earn-in period. Followingnext approximately one year. Should Fabled not complete its obligations described above, the second earn-in period, and priorSanta Maria mining claims will revert to the Company entering into a second and final amendmentthe Company will be entitled to keep any payments made by Fabled under the terms of the agreement, the Company could have maintained its 20% participating interest, or its interest could ultimately have been converted into a carried 10% net profits interest if the Company elected not to participateOption Agreement. The carrying value of Santa Maria as a joint venture owner.of December 31, 2021 is 0.
In September 2018, the Company and Electrum entered into a second and final amendment of the Celaya earn-in agreement pursuant to which Electrum acquired 100% of the Company’s remaining interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a payment of $3.0 million. The transaction was set out in a definitive Assignment of Rights Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) containing customary terms and conditions. The earn-in agreement was terminated upon entry into the Assignment Agreement.
The Company has previously expensed all its costs associated withrecorded the Celaya property and accordingly recognized gains of $1.0$0.5 million received from the execution of the first amendment to the agreement and $3.0 millionFabled upon execution of the Assignment Agreement, duringagreement to “Deferred revenue” on the year ended December 31, 2018, withaccompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized the amounts included inamount to “Other operating income, net” inincome” over a one year period through December 2021. The Company recorded the $1.5 million received from Fabled for the second payment received on the first anniversary date, as noted above, to “Deferred revenue” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of OperationsBalance Sheets and Comprehensive Loss.
Zacatecas Farm-out
In April 2016,is amortizing the Company entered into an option agreement, which was later amended in February 2018, under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santacruz”) has acquired the Company’s interest in the Zacatecas Properties foramount to income over a series of payments totaling approximately $1.5 millionone year period through October 2018, including $249,000, $225,000 and $212,000 paid to the Company during the first, second and third quarters of 2018, respectively. The final payment due the Company of $13,000 was received in October 2018.December 2022. Upon receipt of each cash payment, the agreement imposedOption Agreement imposes a performance obligation on the Company to provide SantacruzFabled an exclusive right to the ZacatecasSanta Maria Properties to conduct exploration and mining activities during the period from receipt of the payment until the next payment due date with a final obligation, following receipt of the finalnext required payment. Accordingly, the Company has determined that its performance obligation for each option payment to formally acknowledge completion of the sale enabling Santacruz to register the title to the properties in their namereceived is satisfied over time. At December 31, 2018,2021, there is a remaining unamortized balance of approximately $1.5 million.
Construction in Progress
Construction in progress at December 31, 2020 is related to upgrades that were no further performance obligationsmade at the Velardeña Properties processing plant that processes the Rodeo mined material.
9. | Other Long-Term Assets |
Other long-term assets at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 consist of the following:
| | | | | | | |
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, | |||
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | ||
| | (in thousands) |
| ||||
Deferred offering costs | | $ | 70 | | $ | 479 | |
Right of use assets | |
| 677 | |
| 993 | |
| | $ | 747 | | $ | 1,472 | |
The right of use assets at December 31, 2021 include approximately $0.4 million related to certain office leases and $0.3 million related to a mining equipment lease at our Rodeo Property. The right of use assets at December 31, 2020 include approximately $0.5 million related to certain office leases and $0.5 million related to a mining equipment lease at our Rodeo Property.
The deferred offering costs at December 31, 2021 were associated with the ATM Agreement (see Note 15). The deferred offering costs at December 31, 2020 were associated with the ATM Agreement and the Company had taken all steps necessary for Santacruz to take title to the properties.
Commitment Purchase
F-21F-17
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Agreement (see Note 15). The Commitment Purchase Agreement expired during May 2021, and as of December 31, 2021 the Company had written off the remaining balance of $353,000 of deferred LPC Program costs to “Interest and Other Expense” on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The Company took possession of new office space and began a new long-term lease for its principal headquarters office with an effective commencement date of June 1, 2019. The new office lease will expire five years and eight full calendar months following the commencement date. There are no options to extend the lease beyond the stated term. The Company recorded a right of use asset of approximately $465,000 and a lease liability of approximately $450,000 in the second quarter of 2019 based on the net present value of the future lease payments discounted at 9.5%, which represents the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at the time of the agreement for purposes of applying the guidance of Topic 842. As required, the Company will recognize a single lease cost on a straight-line basis.
The Company also has long-term office leases in Mexico and Argentina that expired in 2019 and recorded a combined right of use asset and liability of approximately $45,000 relating to both of those leases at January 1, 2019. In November 2019, the Company renewed its Mexican office lease for four years and recorded a right of use asset and lease liability of approximately $174,000. In December 2021, the Company also renewed its Argentina office lease for three years and recorded a right of use asset and lease liability of approximately $27,000.
In December 2020, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Minera de Cordilleras S. de R.L. de C.V., entered into an agreement with Triturados del Guadiana, S.A de C.V. (“Trigusa”), whereby Trigusa will carry out mining activities at the Rodeo property. Per the terms of the mining agreement, Trigusa will provide services for the 27-month period ending March 31, 2023, with the potential for an extension of time upon mutual agreement of both parties. The Company has previously expensed all its costs associated withdetermined that the Zacatecas Properties.mining agreement contains an embedded lease, relating to the mining equipment provided by Trigusa, per the guidance of ASU 2016-02 and Topic 842. The Company recognized income, equal todid not elect the cash payments made, evenly overpractical expedient permitting the period covered by each payment.combination of lease and non lease components of the mining agreement. The Company recognizedrecorded a right of use asset and a lease liability of approximately $748,000$420,000 based on the net present value of income under the agreement duringfuture lease payments discounted at 7.0%, which represents the year endedCompany’s incremental borrowing rate at the time of the agreement.
The lease liabilities noted above have been included in “Other liabilities”, short term and long term (Note 12), in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018, which is included2021 and December 31, 2020.
F-18
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. United States dollars)
.
10. | Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities |
10.Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities
The Company’s accounts payable and other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | |||||||
| | December 31, | | December 31, | | |||||||||
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| |||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| |||||||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
| | (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
Accounts payable and accruals |
| $ | 358 |
| $ | 310 |
| | $ | 1,079 | | $ | 472 | |
Accrued employee compensation and benefits |
|
| 1,344 |
|
| 1,246 |
| | | 2,009 | | | 846 | |
|
| $ | 1,702 |
| $ | 1,556 |
| |||||||
Income taxes payable | |
| 293 | |
| — | | |||||||
| | $ | 3,381 | | $ | 1,318 | | |||||||
December 31, 20182021
Accounts payable and accruals at December 31, 20182021 are primarily related to amounts due to contractors and suppliers in the amounts of $0.2$0.7 million related to the Company’s Velardeña Propertiesand Rodeo properties and $0.2 million related to exploration and corporate administrative and exploration activities. In the case of the Velardeña Properties, approximately $0.1 million is related to a net VAT payable.
Accrued employee compensation and benefits at December 31, 20182021 consist of $0.2 million of accrued vacation payable and $0.4$1.8 million related to withholding taxes and benefits payable. Included in the $2.0 million of accrued employee compensation and benefits is $1.3 million related to activities at the Velardeña Properties and Rodeo Property.
On April 23, 2021, a new labor law was made official in Mexico that impacts companies that utilize subcontractor structures, effective beginning August 1, 2021. The Company utilizes subcontractor structures in Mexico, as is common practice among companies in the mining and other industries in Mexico. The law disallows a deduction in computing income taxes for labor outsourcing costs unless the arrangement falls within certain narrowly defined exceptions. The new law does provide for annual caps on the amount of employee profit sharing a company would be required to pay, which is designed to even out the profit-sharing liability over several years. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has reorganized the functions performed by its various Mexican subsidiaries to comply with the new law. The Company’s profit-sharing liability in Mexico has increased for the full year 2021 as a result of the new law taking effect and the completion of the Company’s reorganization process, and approximately $0.4 million has been accrued for such amount, included in accrued employee compensation and benefits.
The income taxes payable are related to operations at the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries (see Note 14).
December 31, 2020
Accounts payable and accruals at December 31, 2020 are primarily related to amounts due to contractors and suppliers in the amounts of $0.3 million related to the Company’s Velardeña and Rodeo properties and $0.2 million related to exploration and corporate administrative activities.
Accrued employee compensation and benefits at December 31, 2020 consist of $0.3 million of accrued vacation payable and $0.5 million related to withholding taxes and benefits payable. Included in the $0.8 million of accrued employee compensation and benefits is $0.6 million related to activities at the Velardeña Properties and $0.4 million related to the Company’s 2013 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “KELTIP”) (see Note 15).Rodeo properties.
December 31, 2017
Accounts payable and accruals at December 31, 2017 are primarily related to amounts due to contractors and suppliers in the amounts of $0.1 million related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties and $0.2 million related to corporate adminis trative and exploration activities. In the case of the Velardeña Properties, approximately $0.1 million is related to a net VAT payable.
Accrued employee compensation and benefits at December 31, 2017 consist of $0.2 million of accrued vacation payable and $0.6 million related to withholding taxes and benefits payable. Included in the $1.2 million of accrued employee compensation and benefits is $0.3 million related to activities at the Velardeña Properties and $0.4 million related to the KELTIP (see Note 15).
F-22F-19
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
11. | Asset Retirement and Reclamation Liabilities |
11.Asset Retirement and Reclamation Liabilities
TheIn 2012, the Company retained the services of a mining engineering firm to prepare a detailed closure plan for reclamation activity the Velardeña Properties. The plan was completed during the second quarter 2012 and indicated that the Company had an ARO and offsetting ARC of approximately $1.9 million. The estimated $3.5 millionoriginal ARC had been fully amortized or written off by the end of December 31, 2015. The ARO has been adjusted since 2012 for changes in assumptions related to inflation factors and ARCthe timing of future expenditures used in the determination of future cash flows, which previously contemplated that was recordedreclamation activities could begin as early as 2023 following the completion of mining at the timeRodeo property.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, due to the current operating success at Rodeo and the potential of a restart of operations at the Velardeña mine based on recent technical studies and an updated PEA that would further delay the start of any reclamation activity, the Company retained the services of an environmental consultant to review the closure plan to determine the appropriateness of the acquisitionscope and cost estimates used in the calculation of the ARO. The consultant confirmed the adequacy of the scope of the closure plan and provided certain adjustments to cost estimates. In addition, the timing for the incurrence of reclamation activity was extended approximately 7 years to take into account the likelihood of a restart of operations at the Velardeña Properties was adjusted accordingly.mine that would further delay the start of any reclamation activity.
The Company will continue to accrue additional estimated ARO amounts based on an asset retirementthe closure plan and as activities requiring future reclamation and remediation occur. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company recognized approximately $0.2 million of accretion expense and approximately $2,000 of amortization expense related to the ARC.
The following table summarizes activity in the Velardeña Properties ARO:ARO for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
| | | | | | | | |||||||
| | Year Ended |
| |||||||||||
| | December 31, | | |||||||||||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| Year Ended |
| |||||||||||
|
| December 31, |
| |||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| |||||||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
| | (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
Beginning balance |
| $ | 2,448 |
| $ | 2,380 |
| | $ | 3,156 | | $ | 2,825 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| | | | | | | | |||||||
Changes in estimates, and other |
|
| 2 |
|
| (128) |
| |
| 143 | |
| 82 | |
Accretion expense |
|
| 210 |
|
| 196 |
| |
| 262 | |
| 249 | |
Ending balance |
| $ | 2,660 |
| $ | 2,448 |
| | $ | 3,561 | | $ | 3,156 | |
The decreasechange in estimate of the ARO recorded during the year ended December 31, 20172021 is primarily the result of changes in assumptions related to the amount and timing of future expenditures used in the determination of future cash flows as a result of a review of the closure plan undertaken in the fourth quarter 2021, as noted above (also see Note 13). The change in estimate of the ARO recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 is primarily the result of changes in assumptions related to inflation factors and discount rates used in the determination of future cash flows.flows during that period.
Accretion expense in the table noted above for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 has been recorded as “Reclamation expense” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. To the extent that a positive change in estimates, and other for the ARO is related to fixed plant and equipment, an offsetting ARC is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets with which it is associated and depreciated over the useful life of the asset, otherwise the increase is recorded as “Other operating expense, net” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. A negative change in estimates, and other is recorded as a decrease to the ARC previously recorded or, as appropriate, to “Other operating income, net” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
F-20
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The ARO set forth on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 20172020 includes a nominal amount of reclamation liability related to activities at the El Quevar project in Argentina.
12. | Other Liabilities |
12.OtherOther Current Liabilities
The Company recorded nominal amounts offollowing table sets forth the Company’s other current liabilities at December 31, 20182021 and 2020:
| | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | December 31, | ||
|
| 2021 | | 2020 | ||
| | (in thousands) | ||||
Premium financing | | $ | 394 | | $ | 390 |
Office lease liability | |
| 120 | |
| 138 |
Mining equipment lease liability | | | 207 | | | 139 |
| | $ | 721 | | $ | 667 |
The premium financing at December 31, 2017.2021 consists of the remaining balance, plus accrued interest, related to premiums payable for the Company’s directors and officers insurance. In November 2021 the Company financed approximately $0.4 million of its premium for directors and officers insurance. The amountspremium is payable in 8 equal payments at an interest rate of 4.0% per annum. At December 31, 2021 the remaining balance, plus accrued interest, was approximately $0.4 million.
The premium financing at December 31, 2020 consists of the remaining balance, plus accrued interest, related to premiums payable for the Company’s directors and officers insurance and general liability insurance. In June 2020, the Company financed approximately $0.1 million of its premium for general liability insurance. The premium was payable in 12 equal payments at an interest rate of 5.7% per annum. At December 31, 2020, the remaining balance, plus accrued interest, was approximately $23,000. In December 2020 the Company financed approximately $0.4 million of its premium for directors and officers insurance. The premium was payable in 8 equal payments at an interest rate of 5.7% per annum. At December 31, 2020 the remaining balance, plus accrued interest, was approximately $0.4 million.
The office lease liability is related to lease liabilities for office space at the Company’s principal headquarters in Golden, Colorado and in Mexico and Argentina (see Note 9).
The mining equipment lease liability is related to equipment used by the contract miner at our Rodeo property (see Note 9).
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities of $0.4 million for the period ended December 31, 2021, are primarily related to lease liabilities for office space at the Company’s principal headquarters in Golden, Colorado and in Mexico and Argentina (see Note 9). Also included in other long-term liabilities is approximately $19,000 of deferred income taxes payable (see Note 14).
F-21
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Other long-term liabilities of $0.6 million for the period ended December 31, 2020, consist of $0.3 million related to a mining equipment lease liability at our Rodeo property and $0.3 million related to lease liabilities for office lease. space at the Company’s principal headquarters in Golden Colorado and in Mexico and Argentina (see Note 9).
13. | Fair Value Measurements |
13.Fair Value Measurements
Financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring (annual) basis under a framework of a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. This hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Further, financial assets and liabilities should be classified by level in their entirety based upon the lowest level of input that was significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy per ASC 820 are as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.
F-23
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Level 2: Quoted prices in inactive markets for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or other observable inputs either directly related to the asset or liability or derived principally from corroborated observable market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs due to the fact that there is little or no market activity. This entails using assumptions in models which estimate what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis at fair value at December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 by respective level of the fair value hierarchy:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Total |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Total |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| | (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 3,293 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3,293 |
| | $ | 12,229 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 12,229 | |
Lease receivables |
|
| 481 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 481 |
| |||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
|
| 330 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 330 |
| |
| 67 | |
| — | |
| — | |
| 67 | |
|
| $ | 4,104 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 4,104 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
At December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| | $ | 12,296 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 12,296 | | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||
At December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 3,250 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3,250 |
| | $ | 9,704 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 9,704 | |
Lease receivables |
|
| 314 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 314 |
| |||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
|
| 238 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 238 |
| |
| 79 | |
| — | |
| — | |
| 79 | |
|
| $ | 3,802 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3,802 |
| |||||||||||||
| | $ | 9,783 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 9,783 | | |||||||||||||
The Company’s cash equivalents, comprised principally of U.S. treasury securities, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s trade accounts receivable are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and are related to the oxide plant lease per the terms of the lease rates established in the plant lease agreement.
The Company’s short-term investments consist of the 1,000,000 shares of common stock in Golden Tagof Fabled and 200,000 shares of Fabled Copper Corp. shares and are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 5)8)
F-22
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
At December 31, 2018 and 20172021 the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities classified within Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. At December 31, 2020 the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities classified within Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements
There were no non-recurring fair value measurements at December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.
F-24
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The Company assesses, where appropriate, the fair value of its liabilities and long lived assets if circumstances indicate a change in the fair value has occurred. The valuation policies are approved by the Chief Financial Officer who reviews and approves the inputs used in the fair value calculations and the changes in fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness. Fair value measurements are discussed with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as deemed appropriate.
NoThe Company recorded an addition to its ARO as of December 31, 2021, of approximately $143,000 (see Note 11), reflecting a change in the fair value of the ARO primarily as the result of changes in assumptions related to the amount and timing of future expenditures used in the determination of future cash flows, following the guidance of ARC Topic 410. The fair value analysis was performed internally by the Company with the assistance of third-party experts. A third-party expert was used to assess the environmental closure and reclamation obligations for the Company. A third-party expert was also used to determine an appropriate discount rate for determining the fair value of the ARO at December 31, 2021. The valuation falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
NaN other non-recurring fair value adjustments to liabilities or long lived assets were recorded during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and2021. There were 0 non-recurring fair value measurements at December 31, 2017.2020.
14. | Income Taxes |
14.Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740 on a tax jurisdictional basis. The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | ||||||
| | For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| | 2021 | | 2020 | ||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 | ||||||||
CURRENT TAXES: |
| (in thousands) | | (in thousands) | ||||||||
United States |
| $ | — |
| $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Other Countries |
|
| 13 |
|
| 13 | |
| 443 | |
| 48 |
|
| $ | 13 |
| $ | 13 | ||||||
| | $ | 443 | | $ | 48 | ||||||
DEFERRED TAXES: |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | |
United States |
| $ | — |
| $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Other Countries |
|
| — |
|
| — | |
| 19 | |
| — |
|
| $ | — |
| $ | — | ||||||
| | $ | 19 | | $ | — | ||||||
Total income tax provision |
| $ | 13 |
| $ | 13 | | $ | 462 | | $ | 48 |
F-23
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes by country consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | |||||||
| | For the Year Ended December 31, | | |||||||||||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| |||||||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
| | (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
United States |
| $ | (1,930) |
| $ | (7,197) |
| | $ | (3,723) | | $ | (9,056) | |
Other Countries |
|
| (2) |
|
| 3,318 |
| |
| 2,090 | |
| 18 | |
|
| $ | (1,932) |
| $ | (3,879) |
| |||||||
| | $ | (1,633) | | $ | (9,038) | | |||||||
The Company recorded $13,000$443,000 of current tax expense and $13,000$19,000 of deferred tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021, stemming primarily from 7.5% special mining tax and the taxable income of certain subsidiaries in Mexico related to the Rodeo operation. The Company recorded $48,000 of current tax expense for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively,2020, stemming primarily from the taxable income of a subsidiarysubsidiaries in Mexico. NoThere were no deferred taxes were recorded in 2018 or 2017, as any such tax expense or benefit incurred duringfor the year has been offset against a change in the valuation allowance of various deferred tax assets in each country.ended December 31, 2020.
F-25
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes computed at the statutory rate to the provision for income taxes as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss is summarized below.
| | | | | | | |
| | For Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
| | (in thousands) |
| ||||
Tax expense (benefit) at U.S. rate of 21% | | $ | (343) | | $ | (1,898) | |
Other adjustments: | | | | | | | |
Rate differential of other jurisdictions | |
| 505 | |
| 46 | |
Effects of foreign earnings | |
| 687 | |
| (1,021) | |
Change in valuation allowance | |
| (6,948) | |
| 7,246 | |
Provision to tax return true-ups | | | (99) | | | (478) | |
Exchange rate changes on deferred tax assets | | | 3,893 | | | (4,050) | |
Mexican special mining tax | | | 212 | | | — | |
Expired net operating losses | | | 2,667 | | | 753 | |
Other | |
| (112) | |
| (550) | |
Income tax provision | | $ | 462 | | $ | 48 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| For Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
|
| (in thousands) |
| ||||
Tax expense (benefit) at US rate of 21% |
| $ | (406) |
| $ | (1,319) |
|
Other adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate differential of other jurisdictions |
|
| 67 |
|
| (70) |
|
Effects of foreign earnings |
|
| (455) |
|
| 310 |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
| (16,142) |
|
| 33,975 |
|
Provision to tax return true-ups |
|
| (2,012) |
|
| (33,720) |
|
Exchange rate changes on deferred tax assets |
|
| 5,891 |
|
| (8,444) |
|
Effect of a change in tax rates |
|
| — |
|
| 11,516 |
|
Tax loss on sale of subsidiary |
|
| — |
|
| (1,693) |
|
Inflation adjustment on net operating losses |
|
| (550) |
|
| (2,491) |
|
Expired net operating losses |
|
| 13,669 |
|
| 1,931 |
|
Other |
|
| (49) |
|
| 18 |
|
Income tax provision |
| $ | 13 |
| $ | 13 |
|
F-24
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The components of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |||||||
| | For the year ended |
| |||||||||||
| | December 31, |
| |||||||||||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| For the year ended |
| |||||||||||
|
| December 31, |
| |||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| |||||||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
| | (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | |
Net operating loss carryforwards |
| $ | 117,665 |
| $ | 131,866 |
| | $ | 110,451 | | $ | 119,109 | |
Capital loss carry forwards | |
| 1,702 | |
| 1,702 | | |||||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
| 593 |
|
| 517 |
| |
| 896 | |
| 747 | |
Property, plant and equipment |
|
| 3,284 |
|
| 4,307 |
| |
| 4,624 | |
| 3,287 | |
Other |
|
| 2,809 |
|
| 3,274 |
| |
| 1,755 | |
| 1,662 | |
|
|
| 124,351 |
|
| 139,964 |
| |||||||
| |
| 119,428 | |
| 126,507 | | |||||||
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
| (123,652) |
|
| (139,795) |
| |
| (118,580) | |
| (125,528) | |
Total deferred tax assets |
|
| 699 |
|
| 169 |
| |
| 848 | |
| 979 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| | | | | | | | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment |
|
| (699) |
|
| (169) |
| |
| (703) | |
| (778) | |
Other | |
| (164) | |
| (201) | | |||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
| (699) |
|
| (169) |
| |
| (867) | |
| (979) | |
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | (19) | | $ | — | |
In accordance with ASC 740, the Company presents deferred tax assets net of its deferred tax liabilities on a tax jurisdictional basis on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2018 and2021 was $19,000, primarily related to the 7.5% special mining tax in Mexico. The net deferred tax liability as of December 31, 20172020 was zero. 0.
At the end of 2017 a new U.S. tax law was enacted, lowering the U.S. corporate tax rate beginning in 2018 to 21% from the top rate of 35%. The tax rate change resulted in a reduction of the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets by $10.2 million. The Company’s deferred tax assets are currently completely offset by a valuation allowance so the reduction
F-26
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
in U.S. deferred tax assets had no impact on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, the new tax law imposed a transition tax on the accumulated earnings and profits of controlled foreign corporations (“CFC’s). None of the Company’s CFCs currently have accumulated earnings and profits and therefore the Company had no transition tax liability. No other provisions of the new tax law had a material impact on the Company’s financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2017.
At December 31, 20182021 the Company had net operating loss carryforwards in the U.S. and in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions totaling $434.9$432.4 million. Of these, $79.8In the U.S. there are $83.8 million isof net operating loss carryforwards, $13.2 million of which have no expiration, while the remaining losses will expire in future years through 2037. In the remaining non-U.S. countries, there are $68.8 million of net operating loss carryforwards related to the Rodeo operation and Velardeña Properties in Mexico, and expires in future years through 2028, $12.5 million is related to other Mexico exploration activities expiring in future years through 2028, $89.6 million exists in Spain and has no expiration date, and $179.7 million exists in other non-U.S. countries, which will expire in future years through 2035. In the U.S. there are $73.32030, $91.8 million of net operating loss carryforwardsin Spain, which have no expiration.expiration date, and $188.0 million in other non-U.S. countries (including Luxemburg, Peru, Argentina and Canada), which will expire in future years through 2041.
The valuation allowance offsetting the net deferred tax assets of the Company of $123.7$118.6 million and $139.8$125.5 million at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, relates primarily to the uncertain utilization of certain deferred tax assets, primarily net operating loss carryforwards, in various tax jurisdictions. The Company continually assesses both positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets can be realized prior to their expiration.
The Company, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries file tax returns in the United States and in various foreign jurisdictions. The tax rules and regulations in these countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation. The Company’s tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities and in connection with such examinations, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain tax rules within the country involved. In accordance with ASC 740, the Company identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions, and recognizes the impact of uncertain tax positions for which there is less than a more-likely-than-not probability of the
F-25
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
position being upheld upon review by the relevant taxing authority. Such positions are deemed to be “unrecognized tax benefits” which require additional disclosure and recognition of a liability within the financial statements. If recognized, none of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the Company’s effective tax rate.
Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, which excludes any estimated penalties and interest on all identified unrecognized tax benefits. The Company’sCompany had 0 unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2021. The unrecognized tax benefit as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are2020 is completely offset by net deferred tax benefits and therefore dodoes not appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
| | | | | | | | |||||||
| | The Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| The Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| |||||||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
| | (in thousands) |
| |||||||||||
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period |
| $ | 586 |
| $ | 740 |
| | $ | 249 | | $ | 269 | |
Increases for tax positions taken during prior years |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
| — | |
| — | |
Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| |
| — | |
| — | |
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations |
|
| (213) |
|
| (154) |
| |
| (249) | |
| (20) | |
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of period |
| $ | 373 |
| $ | 586 |
| | $ | — | | $ | 249 | |
Tax years as early as 20122016 remain open and are subject to examination in the Company’s principal tax jurisdictions. The Company does not expect a significant change to its net unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months. NoNaN interest and penalties were recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the year ended December 31, 20182021 or 2017,2020, and there were no0 interest and penalties recognized in the statement of
F-27
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
financial position as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. The Company classifies income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense.
F-26
15.EquityGOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
15. | Equity |
Public offering
On July 21, 2020, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC as representative of the underwriters named in Schedule I thereto (the “Underwriters”), providing for the issuance and sale by the Company in a firm commitment offering (the “Offering”) of 17,857,143 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $0.42 per share (the “Offering Shares”). In addition, the Company granted the Underwriters an option to purchase, at the public offering price per share of common stock, up to an additional 2,678,571 shares of common stock, exercisable for 30 days from the date of the Underwriting Agreement (the “Option Shares”). The Offering Shares and Option Shares were registered pursuant to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-220461), and a prospectus supplement thereto filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. On July 24, 2020, the Underwriters acquired the Offering Shares and the full amount of the Option Shares from the Company. After the underwriting discount of 6% and total offering expenses of approximately $155,000 the Company received net proceeds of approximately $8.0 million from the sale of the Offering Shares and the Option Shares.
2020 offering and private placement transaction
On April 20, 2020, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional investors providing for the issuance and sale of 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.20 per share, and in a concurrent private placement transaction, the issuance of an aggregate of 11,250,000 warrants, ultimately consisting of 7,500,000 series A warrants and 3,750,000 series B warrants (each a “Warrant” and collectively, the “Warrants”), to purchase up to 11,250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $3.0 million (the “Offering”). The securities purchase agreement granted the institutional investors the right to collectively participate in up to 50% of any future offerings of securities by the Company on the same terms as other investors, other than certain “exempt issuances” and “permitted sales” as defined in the securities purchase agreement, until April 22, 2021.
Each Warrant is exercisable six months from the date of issuance on April 22, 2020 and has a term expiring five years after such initial exercise date. The Warrants contain so-called full-ratchet anti-dilution provisions which may be triggered upon any future issuance by the Company of shares of its common stock or common stock equivalents at a per share price below the then-exercise price of the Warrant, subject to certain exceptions; provided, however, that with respect to the Series B warrants, the adjusted exercise price will not be less than $0.26.
The net proceeds of the Offering were recorded in equity and appear as a separate line item in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity. Total costs for the Offering were approximately $334,000, including listing fees, legal and other costs, and the placement agent fee of 6 percent of aggregate gross proceeds, however, a reduced fee was accepted with respect to one investor. All such costs were recorded as a reduction to “Additional paid in capital” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Using the Black Scholes model, and assuming no triggering events take place to reduce the exercise price of the warrants, the fair value of the combined Series A and Series B warrants issued was approximately $1.9 million on April 22, 2020, the date of issuance of the warrants. The Black Scholes inputs included the closing stock price on April 22, 2020 (the date of issuance of the warrants) of $0.24, the exercise price and exercise period of the warrants, the Company’s applicable volatility rate for the period of the Warrants of 95%, and the applicable risk-free rate of 0.41%.
F-27
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Subscription agreement
In connection with the Earn-In Agreement, the Company and Barrick entered into the Subscription Agreement dated as of April 9, 2020 pursuant to which Barrick purchased 4,719,207 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.2119 per share in a private placement transaction. The Shares were offered and sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The net proceeds of the Subscription Agreement of approximately $0.9 million were recorded in equity and appear as a separate line item in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity.
Registered direct purchase agreement and commitment purchase agreement and registration rights agreement
On May 9, 2018 the Company entered into a registered direct purchase agreement (the “Registered Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“LPC”) pursuant to which LPC purchased 3,153,808 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.4122 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American on May 8, 2018, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.3 million.
On May 9, 2018, the Company also entered into a commitment purchase agreement (the “Commitment Purchase Agreement” and together with the Registered Purchase Agreement, the “LPC Program”) and a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with LPC, pursuant to which the Company, at its sole discretion, has the right to sell up to an additional $10.0 million of the Company’s common stock to LPC, subject to certain limitations and conditions contained in the Commitment Purchase Agreement. The Company closed on the Commitment Purchase Agreement in July 2018. The Commitment Purchase Agreement expired in May 2021.
On June 7, 2018, pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreements,During year ended December 31, 2021, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-225483) (the “Registration Statement”) registering the resale up to 15,222,941did not sell any shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued to LPC pursuant to the terms ofunder the Commitment Purchase Agreement. The Registration Statement was declared effective on June 28, 2018. Proceeds fromWith the LPC Program will be used for general corporate purposes, including advancing the exploration program at the Company’s El Quevar property in Argentina.
Subject to the termsMay 2021 expiration of the Commitment Purchase Agreement,agreement, the Company will controlwrote off the timing and amountremaining balance of any future sale of the Company’s common stock to LPC. LPC has no right to require any sales by the Company under the Commitment Purchase Agreement but is obligated to make purchases at the Company’s sole direction, as governed by such agreement. There are no upper limits to the price LPC may be obligated to pay to purchase common stock from the Company and the purchase price of the shares will be based on the prevailing market prices of the Company’s shares at the time of each sale to LPC. LPC has agreed not to cause or engage in any manner whatsoever, any direct or indirect short selling or hedging of the Company’s shares of common stock. The Company has the right to terminate the Commitment Purchase Agreement at any time, at its discretion, without any cost or penalty.
In consideration for LPC’s commitment to purchase shares pursuant to the Commitment Purchase Agreement, the Company paid LPC a commitment fee of $300,000 and incurred an additional approximate $190,000 in stock exchange fees, legal and other associated costs in connection with the LPC Program. The total costs for the LPC Program will be recorded as a reduction to equity as common stock is sold to LPC. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $58,000 of LPC Program costs had been amortized against $1.3 million in proceeds received, resulting in $432,000$353,000 of deferred LPC Program costs recorded in “Prepaid expensesto “Interest and other assets”Other Expense” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Statement of Operations.
As ofDuring the year ended December 31, 2018, no additional common stock had been2020 the Company sold to LPC under the LPC Program following the initial sale900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the Registered Purchase Agreement. Subsequent to December 31, 2018 the Company sold an aggregate of approximately 745,000 common sharesLPC under the Commitment Purchase Agreement at an average sales price per share of $0.31 per common share for totalapproximately $0.27, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $230,000 during the year to date period ended February 27, 2019.
F-28
Table$216,000. In addition, approximately $24,000 of Contents
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(ExpressedCommitment Purchase Agreement costs were amortized, resulting in United States dollars)
Cancellationa remaining balance of Treasury Shares
Pursuant to the terms$352,000 of an agreement between the Company and ECU, relating to the merger of the two companiesdeferred LPC Program costs, recorded in “Other long-term assets” on September 2, 2011, ECU shareholders had the right to receive 0.05 shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of ECU common stock held. On the sixth anniversary following the merger any unconverted shares expired per the terms of the agreement. Accordingly, during December 2017, ECU shares being held for conversion, representing 125,739 shares of the Company, were returned to treasury and canceled.
Consideration Shares
On August 2, 2017, the Company granted Hecla an option to extend the oxide plant lease for an additional period of up to two years (see Note 16). As partial consideration for the option Hecla purchased $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares, of the Company’s common stock (the “Consideration Shares”), issued at a price of $0.55 per share, which was the undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price. The Consideration Shares were offered and sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Under the terms of the Option Agreement (defined in Note 16), the Company agreed to register with the SEC the resale of the Consideration Shares. A resale registration statement with the SEC became effective in September 2017. The $1.0 million received for the Consideration Shares, net of $71,000 in legal and stock exchange issuance fees, has been recorded as equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets atas of December 31, 2017.2020.
At the Market Offering Agreement
In December 2016, the Company entered into an at-the-market offering agreement (as amended from time to time, the “ATM Agreement”) with H. C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“Wainwright”), under which the Company may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of the Company’s common stock through Wainwright as sales manager in an at-the-market offering under a prospectus supplement for aggregate sales proceeds of up to $5.0 million (the “ATM Program”) or a maximum of 10 million shares. On September 29, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to the ATM Agreement with Wainwright to reflect a new registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-220461) under which shares of the Company’s common stock may be sold under the ATM Program. On November 23, 2018 the Company entered into a second amendment of the ATM Agreement extending the agreement until the earlier of December 20, 2020, or the date that the ATM Agreement is terminated in accordance with the terms therein. On December 11, 2020 the Company entered
F-28
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
into a third amendment of the ATM Agreement further extending the agreement so that it will remain in full force and effect until such time as the ATM Agreement is terminated in accordance with certain other terms therein or upon mutual agreement by the parties, and to reflect a new registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-249218).
Offers or sales of common shares under the ATM Program will be made only in the United States and no offers or sales of common shares under the ATM Agreement will be made in Canada. The common stock will be distributed at the market prices prevailing at the time of sale. As a result, prices of the common stock sold under the ATM Program may vary as between purchasers and during the period of distribution. The ATM Agreement provides that Wainwright will be entitled to compensation for its services at a commission rate of 2.0% of the gross sales price per share of common stock sold.
The Company reimbursed certain legal expenses of Wainwright totaling $50,000 and incurred additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs of approximately $109,000 in connection with establishing the ATM Program. Such costs have been deferred and will be amortized to equity as sales are completed under the ATM Program. At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2018, respectively, unamortized costs totaling $136,000 appear on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Prepaid expense and other assets.”
The Company did not sell any stock under the ATM Program duringDuring the year ended December 31, 2018. Subsequent to December 31, 20182021, the Company sold an aggregate of approximately 34,0001,856,960 shares of common shares under the
F-29
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Commitment Purchase Agreement at an average price of $0.34 per common share for total proceeds of approximately $11,000 during the year to date period ended February 27, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company incurred approximately $15,000 in additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs associated with the ATM Program that were included in “General and administrative costs” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company sold an aggregate of approximately 1,024,000 common sharesstock under the ATM Program at an average price of $0.70$0.97 per share of common sharestock for grossnet proceeds, after commissions and fees, of approximately $720,000.$1.8 million. Also, approximately $57,000 of deferred ATM Program costs were amortized. The Company paid cash commissionshas not sold any shares of common stock under the ATM since March 31, 2021. At December 31, 2021 there was a remaining balance of $70,000 of deferred ATM Program costs, recorded in “Prepaid expenses and other nominal transaction fees to Wainwright totaling approximately $16,000 or 2.2% of the gross proceeds and amortized approximately $23,000 of deferred accounting, legal and regulatory costs resulting in a net amount of approximately $682,000 that has been recorded as equity inassets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During the year ended December 31, 20172020, the Company also incurredsold an aggregate of 823,452 shares of common stock under the ATM Agreement at an average price of $0.28 per share of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $34,000$223,000. In addition, approximately $8,000 of deferred ATM Program costs were amortized, resulting in additional accounting, legal, and regulatorya remaining balance of $127,000 of deferred ATM Program costs, associated withrecorded in “Other long-term assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020.
There is currently approximately $2.2 million remaining available for issuance under the ATM Program that were included in “General and administrative costs” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.based on a prospectus supplement filed with SEC on December 11, 2020.
Equity Incentive Plans
Under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) awards of the Company’s common stock may be made to officers, directors, employees, consultants and agents of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation costs using a graded vesting attribution method whereby costs are recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
F-29
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s restricted stock grants issued under the Equity Plan at December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 and changes during the years then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
| The Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Weighted |
|
|
| Weighted |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Average Grant |
|
|
| Average |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Date Fair |
|
|
| Grant Date |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Number of |
| Value Per |
| Number of |
| Fair Value |
| |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
| | The Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| |
| Weighted |
| |
| Weighted |
| |||||||||||||
| | | | Average Grant | | | | Average |
| |||||||||||||
| | | | Date Fair | | | | Grant Date |
| |||||||||||||
| | Number of | | Value Per | | Number of | | Fair Value |
| |||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Grants |
| Shares |
| Share |
| Shares |
| Per Share |
| | Shares | | Share | | Shares | | Per Share |
| ||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
| 203,334 |
| $ | 0.55 |
| 100,000 |
| $ | 0.63 |
| | 224,002 | | $ | 0.36 | | 318,003 | | $ | 0.30 | |
Granted during the period |
| 280,000 |
|
| 0.37 |
| 200,000 |
|
| 0.53 |
|
| 335,000 | |
| 0.67 |
| 300,000 | |
| 0.42 | |
Restrictions lifted during the period |
| (143,333) |
|
| 0.44 |
| (96,666) |
|
| 0.60 |
|
| (265,668) | |
| 0.47 |
| (394,001) | |
| 0.36 | |
Forfeited during the period |
| — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — | |
| — |
| — | |
| — | |
Outstanding at end of period |
| 340,001 |
| $ | 0.45 |
| 203,334 |
| $ | 0.55 |
| | 293,334 | | $ | 0.61 | | 224,002 | | $ | 0.36 | |
During the year ended December 31, 20182021, the Company recognized approximately $165,000 of stock compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants. The Company expects to recognize additional stock compensation expense related to these awards of approximately $0.1 million over the next 18 months. During the year ended December 31, 2021, 335,000 shares were granted to 9 employees, with one-third of the grants (111,666 shares) vesting on the grant date and the remaining shares vesting equally on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date. Also, during the period, restrictions were lifted on the normal vesting of 154,002 shares granted to 6 employees in prior years.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million of compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants. The Company expects to recognize additional compensation expense related to these awards of approximately $0.1 million over the next 24 months. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 280,0002020, 300,000 shares were granted to six7 employees, with one third-third of the grants (100,000 shares) vesting on the grant date and the remaining shares vesting equally on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date. In addition to the vesting of one third-third of the shares granted in 2018,2020, restrictions were lifted on 50,000the normal vesting of 214,001 shares granted to 7 employees in prior years. Also, during the period, the Company lifted restrictions on 80,000 restricted shares and recognized additional compensation expense of $23,000 related to the resignation of an employee during the period.
Pursuant to the Equity Plan the Company had granted 30,310 stock options to certain officers and directors in a prior year.
During2010. The options with an average exercise price of $8.06 expired during 2020. The Company did not incur any expense related to stock options during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017 the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million of compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants. During the year ended2021, and December 31, 2017, 200,000 shares were granted to two employees, with 50,000 shares of one grant vesting on the grant date2020, and the remaining shares vesting equally on the
F-30
Table of Contents0 options remained outstanding at those dates.
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
first and second anniversaries of the grant date. The remaining grant vests ratably over three years. In addition, during 2017, restrictions were lifted on 46,666 shares granted to three employees in a prior year.
The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s stock option grants issued under the Equity Plan at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and changes during the years then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Weighted |
|
|
| Weighted |
| ||
|
|
|
| Average |
|
|
| Average |
| ||
|
|
|
| Exercise |
|
|
| Exercise |
| ||
|
| Number of |
| Price Per |
| Number of |
| Price Per |
| ||
Equity Plan Options |
| Shares |
| Share |
| Shares |
| Share |
| ||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
| 40,310 |
| $ | 8.05 |
| 95,810 |
| $ | 8.02 |
|
Granted during the period |
| — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| — |
|
Forfeited or expired during period |
| (10,000) |
| $ | 8.00 |
| (55,500) |
|
| 8.00 |
|
Exercised during period |
| — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| — |
|
Outstanding at end of period |
| 30,310 |
| $ | 8.06 |
| 40,310 |
| $ | 8.05 |
|
Exercisable at end of period |
| 30,310 |
| $ | 8.06 |
| 40,310 |
| $ | 8.05 |
|
Granted and vested |
| 30,310 |
| $ | 8.06 |
| 40,310 |
| $ | 8.05 |
|
The Company does not expect to record any additional expense related to these options.
Also, pursuant to the Equity Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Non-Employee Director’s Deferred Compensation and Equity Award Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan, the non-employee directors receive a portion of their compensation in the form of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) issued under the Equity Plan. The RSUs vest on the first anniversary of the grant and each vested RSU entitles the director to receive one unrestricted share of common stock upon the termination of the director’s board service.
F-30
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The following table summarizes the status of the RSU grants issued under the Deferred Compensation Plan at December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 and changes during the years then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
| The Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Weighted |
|
|
| Weighted |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Average Grant |
|
|
| Average |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Date Fair |
|
|
| Grant Date |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Number of |
| Value Per |
| Number of |
| Fair Value |
| |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
| | The Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| |
| Weighted |
| |
| Weighted |
| |||||||||||||
| | | | Average Grant | | | | Average |
| |||||||||||||
| | | | Date Fair | | | | Grant Date |
| |||||||||||||
| | Number of | | Value Per | | Number of | | Fair Value | | |||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units |
| Shares |
| Share |
| Shares |
| Per Share |
| | Shares | | Share | | Shares | | Per Share |
| ||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
| 1,887,317 |
| $ | 1.16 |
| 1,607,317 |
| $ | 1.28 |
| |||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2020 | | 3,610,038 | | $ | 0.70 | | 2,830,038 | | $ | 0.78 | | |||||||||||
Granted during the period |
| 600,000 |
|
| 0.42 |
| 280,000 |
|
| 0.48 |
|
| 400,000 | |
| 0.60 |
| 780,000 | |
| 0.40 | |
Restrictions lifted during the period |
| (257,279) |
|
| 1.44 |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — | |
| — |
| — | |
| — | |
Forfeited during the period |
| — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — | |
| — |
| — | |
| — | |
Outstanding at end of period |
| 2,230,038 |
| $ | 0.93 |
| 1,887,317 |
| $ | 1.16 |
| |||||||||||
Outstanding December 31, 2021 | | 4,010,038 | | $ | 0.69 |
| 3,610,038 | | $ | 0.70 | | |||||||||||
For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and 20172021 the Company recognized approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million of compensation expense respectively related to the RSU grants. During 2018,the year ended December 31, 2021, each of the 6 board members were granted 50,000 RSUs that vest one year from the grant date. During December 2021 a new director was granted 100,000 RSUs with 66,667 vesting on the grant date and the remaining 33,333 vesting one year from the grant date.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized approximately $0.3 million of compensation expense related to the RSU grants. During the year ended December 31, 2020, 80,000 RSUs were granted to each of the six6 board members. During 2017, 40,000Included in the RSUs granted during the period were granted300,000 RSUs awarded to eachthe directors in lieu of the seven board members. Restrictions lifted on 257,279 RSU shares during 2018 relateannual cash retainer. Such RSUs vested upon grant and the Company recorded $120,000 of stock compensation expense related to the retirementgrant.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company granted a consultant 100,000 RSUs and recognized $67,000 of a memberstock compensation expense. The RSUs vested on the grant date and each vested RSU entitles the consultant to receive 1 unrestricted share of common stock upon termination of the Company’s Board ofconsulting agreement with the Company. The consultant RSUs are not included in the Directors during
F-31
Table of Contentstable above.
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
the year. The Company expects to recognize additional compensation expense related to the RSU grants of less thanapproximately $0.1 million over the next six months.
Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan
The KELTIPCompany’s 2013 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “KELTIP”) provides for the grant of units (“KELTIP Units”) to certain officers and key employees of the Company, which units will once vested, entitle such officers and employees to receive an amount, in cash or in Company common stock (such method of settlement at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors) issued pursuant to the Company’s Equity Plan, measured generally by the price of the Company’s common stock on the settlement date. KELTIP Units are not an actual equity interest in the Company and are solely unfunded and unsecured obligations of the Company that are not transferable and do not provide the holder with any stockholder rights. Payment of the settlement amount of vested KELTIP Units is deferred generally until the earlier of a change of control of the Company or the date the grantee ceases to serve as an officer or employee of the Company.
F-31
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The Company intends to settle all the KELTIP Units in common stock of the Company, an option that the Board of Directors holds in its sole discretion so long as sufficient shares remain available under the Equity Plan. As a result, all outstanding KELTIP Units are recorded as a liability, included in “Accounts payableequity at December 31, 2021 and other accrued liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (Note 10).December 31, 2020.
During the year ended December 31, 20182021, the Company awarded 600,000granted 1,605,000 KELTIP Units to two2 officers of the Company and recordedrecognized approximately $0.3$1.1 million of stock compensation expense included in “Stock based compensation” inrelated to the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2018 the KELTIP Units were marked-to-market and the Company recognized approximately a $0.3 million reduction of compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018 1,620,000 KELTIP Units were outstanding.
grants. During the year ended December 31, 20172020, the Company awarded 435,000granted 1,400,000 KELTIP Units to two2 officers of the Company and recordedrecognized approximately $0.5 million of stock compensation expense related to the grants. There were 5,330,000 and 3,725,000 KELTIP Units outstanding at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
Subsequent to December 31, 2021, during January 2022, the Company granted 450,000 KELTIP units to a new officer and will recognize approximately $0.2 million of stock compensation expense included in “Stock based compensation”related to the grant in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2017, the KELTIP Units were marked-to-market and the Company recognized approximately a $0.1 million reduction of compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017 1,020,000 KELTIP Units were outstanding.first quarter 2022.
Common stock warrants
The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s common stock warrants at December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 2017,2020, and the changes during the years then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
| Weighted |
|
|
| Weighted |
| ||
|
| Number of |
| Average Exercise |
| Number of |
| Average Exercise |
| ||
|
| Underlying |
| Price Per |
| Underlying |
| Price Per |
| ||
Common Stock Warrants |
| Shares |
| Share |
| Shares |
| Share |
| ||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
| 11,478,172 |
| $ | 0.81 |
| 17,578,950 |
| $ | 2.17 |
|
Granted during period |
| — |
|
| — |
| — |
|
| — |
|
Dilution adjustment |
| 39,524 |
|
| 0.87 |
| 157,302 |
|
| — |
|
Expired during period |
| — |
|
| — |
| (6,258,080) |
|
| 4.62 |
|
Exercised during period |
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Outstanding at end of period |
| 11,517,696 |
| $ | 0.81 |
| 11,478,172 |
| $ | 0.81 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | Weighted |
| |
| | Number of | | Average Exercise | | |
| | Underlying | | Price Per | | |
Common Stock Warrants | | Shares | | Share | | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 | | 14,653,846 | | $ | 0.39 | |
Granted during the period: |
| | | | | |
April 2020 Series A warrants | | 7,500,000 | | | 0.30 | |
April 2020 Series B warrants | | 3,750,000 | | | 0.30 | |
Exercised during period |
| | |
| | |
April 2020 Series A warrants | | (5,000,000) | | | 0.30 | |
April 2020 Series B warrants | | (3,500,000) | | | 0.30 | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2020 | | 17,403,846 | | | 0.38 | |
Exercised during period | | | | | | |
July 2019 Series A warrants | | (200,000) | | | 0.35 | |
July 2019 Series B warrants | | (1,500,000) | | | 0.35 | |
April 2020 Series A warrants |
| (1,400,000) | |
| 0.30 | |
Expired during period | | | | | | |
May 2016 warrants | | (1,500,000) | | | 0.75 | |
Outstanding December 31, 2021 | | 12,803,846 | | $ | 0.34 | |
The warrants relate to prior and current registered offerings and private placements of the Company’s stock. In September 2012,
As discussed above under “Equity – Offering and private placement transaction”, on April 20, 2020, the Company closed on bothentered into a registered public offeringsecurities purchase agreement with certain institutional investors providing for the issuance and sale of 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and in a concurrent private placement with Sentient in which ittransaction, the issuance of an aggregate of 11,250,000 warrants, ultimately consisting of 7,500,000 series A warrants and 3,750,000 series B warrants. During the year ended December 31, 2020, 5,000,000 series A warrants and 3,500,000 series B warrants were exercised,
F-32
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
sold units, consistingfor net proceeds of one share$2.6 million, leaving a balance of 2,500,000 and 250,000 series A and series B warrants outstanding, respectively, as of December 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2021, 1,400,000 series A warrants were exercised, for net proceeds of $0.4 million, leaving a balance of 1,100,000 and 250,000 series A and series B warrants outstanding, respectively, as of December 31, 2021.
On July 17, 2019, the Company issued 8,653,846 registered shares of common stock andin a five-yearregistered direct offering. In connection with the offering, each investor received an unregistered Series A warrant to acquire one half ofpurchase a share of common stock at an exercise pricefor each share of $8.42 per share.common stock purchased. Each Series A total of 3,431,649 warrant shares were issued and becameis exercisable on March 20, 2013 and expired on September 19, 2017, five yearssix months from the date of issuance.issuance and has a term expiring in January 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2021, 200,000 series A warrants were exercised, for net proceeds of $0.1 million, leaving a balance of 8,453,846 series A warrants outstanding.
In September 2014 the Company closed on both a registered public offering and concurrent private placement with Sentient in which it sold units, consisting of one share of common stock and a five-year warrant to acquire one half of a share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.21 per share. A total of 4,746,000 warrant shares were issued that became exercisable on March 11, 2015 and will expire on September 10, 2019, five years from the date of issuance.
In May 2016, the Company issued 8.0 million registered shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) resulting in gross proceeds of $4.0 million. In connection with the Offering,offering, each investor received an unregistered warrant to purchase three‐quartersthree-quarters of a share of common stock for each share of common stock purchased. The resulting 6,000,000 warrant shares havehad an exercise price of $0.75 per share, became exercisable on November 7, 2016 and will expire onwere exercisable until November 6, 2021, five years from the initial exercise date.
The September 2012 and 2014 warrant agreements contain anti-dilution clauses that could result in a resetting of In connection with the warrant exercise price and the number of warrant shares outstanding in the eventJuly 2019 registered direct offering noted above, the Company werealso agreed to issue additional sharesexchange, on a 1-for-one basis, 4,500,000 of its common stock in a future transaction at an offering price lower than the current exercise price of the warrants. As a result of the subsequent issuance of the Company’s common stock in separate transactions, including the conversion of the Senior Secured Convertible Note which the Company entered into in October 2015 to borrow $5.0 million from Sentient, the Company’s largest stockholder, the May 2016 Offering and private placement, the ATM Program, the issuance of shareswarrants for Series B warrants to Hecla in August 2017 and the Registered Purchase Agreement with LPC (discussed above), the exercise price of the 2012 and 2014 warrants has been adjusted downward. As a result of these transactions, the number ofpurchase 4,500,000 shares of common stock issuable uponat an exercise price of $0.35 per share. Each Series B warrant is exercisable six months from the date of issuance and has a term expiring in May 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2021, 1,500,000 of the September 2012series B warrants prior to their expiration on September 19, 2017, had increasedwere exercised, for net proceeds of $0.5 million, leaving a balance of 3,000,000 series B warrants outstanding. The remaining 1,500,000 warrants from the original 3,431,649 shares to 6,258,080 shares (2,826,431 share increase) and the exercise price had been reduced from the original $8.42 per share to $4.62 per share. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the September 2014 warrants has increased from the original 4,746,000 shares to 5,517,696 shares (771,696 share increase) and the exercise price has been reduced from the original $1.21 per share to $0.85 per share.
The May 2016 warrants areoffering that were not subject to anti-dilution andexchanged in the July 2019 registered direct offering expired on November 6, 2021.
All outstanding warrants are recorded as equity. The September 2012 warrants expired during 2017, and because of a change in accounting principle, the September 2014 warrants were recorded in equity on the balance sheet at December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 2017 (see Note 4). 2020 following the guidance established by ASC Topic 815-40. The Company’s warrants allow for the potential settlement in cash if certain extraordinary events are affected by the Company, including a 50% or greater change of control in the Company’s common stock. Since those events have been deemed to be within the Company’s control, the Company continues to apply equity treatment for these warrants.
16.Revenue, Deferred Revenue16. Sale of Metals and Related Costs
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold gold and silver contained in doré bars related to the Rodeo operation and recorded revenue of approximately $25.6 million, (approximately $24.7 million related to gold in the doré bars, approximately $1.2 million related to silver in the doré bars offset by refining and other selling costs of approximately $0.3 million). The company recorded related costs of approximately $13.3 million. The gold and silver contained in the doré bars were sold to one customer, a metals refinery located in the United States. Under the terms of the Company’s exclusive agreement with its customer, title and control passes and revenue is recognized by the Company when the contractual performance obligations of the parties are completed, generally at the time a provisional or final payment for the gold and silver is agreed to by the parties. A provisional payment for approximately 95% of the contained gold and silver is made generally within 10-12 days after the product is shipped and customary sales documents are completed. A final payment for the gold and the silver is made within approximately 30 days following the date of shipment when final assays and refinery charges are agreed upon by the parties. A separate price for the gold and silver sold is set, based on current market prices, at the time a provisional or final payment is made. There are no minimum or maximum quantities defined under the agreement. Refining and transport costs, deducted from the final payments made, are treated as third party costs incurred by the Company in performing its obligations under the agreement with its customer after the transfer of control on provisional sales, and are therefore netted against revenue on an accrual basis.
F-33
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Costs related to the sale of metals products include direct and indirect costs incurred to mine, process and market the products.
During the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company did 0t sell any doré products or incur any related costs.
17. | Oxide Plant Lease Revenue and Related Costs |
For the year ended December 31, 20182020 the Company recorded revenue of approximately $7.2$5.6 million and related costs of approximately $2.3$2.0 million associated with the lease of the Velardeña Properties oxide plant.plant to Hecla. The Company recognizes oxide plant fixed and variable lease fees as well asand reimbursements for labor, utility and other costs as “Revenue: Oxide plant lease” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss following the guidance of ASC 606 regarding842. ASC 842 supports recording as gross revenue the income statement characterizationreimbursement of reimbursements received for certain expenses incurred directly by the Company in performing its obligations under the lease and reporting revenue grossin situations where the entity has control over the specific goods or services transferred to a customer as a principal versus net as an agent. ASC 606 supports recording as gross revenue fees received for the reimbursement of expenses in situations where the recipient is the primary obligor and has certain discretion in the incurrence of the reimbursable expense. The actual costs incurred for reimbursed direct labor and utility costs are reported as “Oxide plant lease costs” in the Consolidated
F-33
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.Operations. The Company recognizes lease fees during the period the fees are earned per the terms of the lease. The oxide plant lease revenue includes a minimum fixed fee of $125,000 per month that is not dependent on tonnes processed. The monthly fixed fee remains payable for as long as the lease is in effect.
On August 2, 2017,July 7, 2020, the Company grantedreceived notification from Hecla an option to extendterminating the oxide plant lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 (the “Extension Period”) in exchange for a $1.0 million upfront cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares, of the Company’s common stock, issued at par at a price of $0.55 per share, based on an undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price. The option and lease extension were memorialized in (i) an Option Agreement dated August 2, 2017 among the Company and Hecla Mining Company (the “Option Agreement”), and (ii) a Second Amendment to Master Agreement and Lease, Agreement dated August 2, 2017 among Minera William S.A. de C.V., an indirect subsidiary of the Company, and Minera Hecla S.A. de C.V., an indirect subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company (the “Second Amendment”). Under the Second Amendment, Hecla had an option to extend the lease to December 31, 2020 by exercising the option no later than October 3, 2018. On October 1, 2018 Hecla exercised the Second Amendment option and extended the lease to December 31,effective November 30, 2020. All of the fixed fees and throughput related charges remain the same as under the original lease. Similar volume limitations apply to any required future tailings expansions, which Hecla will fund, leaving unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility. Pursuant to the Second Amendment, Hecla has the right to terminate the leaseTherefore, during the Extension Period for any reason with 120 days’ notice. Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following a termination notice through December 31, 2020 if the Company decides to use the oxide plant for its own purposes before December 31, 2020.
The Company will recognize the $1.0 million of income from granting the option over the expected life of the lease from August 2, 2017 through December 31, 2020 on a straight-line basis, including such income in “Revenue: Oxide plant lease” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. During the year ended December 31, 20182021, the company recognized approximately $0.3 million of amortizedCompany did 0t record any income related toor costs associated with the upfront cash payment, included in “Revenue: Oxide plant lease” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. As of December 31, 2018, the unamortized portion of the lease option totaled approximately $0.6 million recorded as short and long term “Deferred revenue” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. oxide plant to Hecla.
For the year ended December 31, 20172020, the Company recorded revenuerecognized a reduction of $254,000 to “Revenue - plant lease” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to the change in the fair value of a derivative related to the Hecla Lease on November 30, 2020 (see Note 7). During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company also recognized approximately $6.7 million and$180,000 “Revenue - plant lease” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related coststo the amortization of approximately $2.2 million associated with the lease of the Velardeña Properties oxide plant.deferred revenue.
.
18. | Interest and Other Expense, net |
17.Interest and Other Income
For the year ended December 31, 20182021 the Company recognized approximately $0.4 million other expense primarily related the write off of deferred costs related to the LPC Program (see Note 15).
For the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company recorded approximately $0.1 million of interest and other income, primarily related to mark-to-market gains on short term investments Note 5.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company had only a nominal amount of interest and other income,expense, primarily related to interest on amounts receivable frompaid to Autlán and interest incurred related to the salefinancing of mining equipmentcertain insurance premiums (see Note 12) as discussed inwell as to Sentient (see Note 9.23).
F-34
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
19. | Cash flow information |
18.Cash flow information
The following table reconciles net loss for the period to cash used in operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
|
| (in thousands) |
| ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
| $ | (1,945) |
| $ | (3,892) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 1,171 |
|
| 952 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
| 163 |
|
| 196 |
|
Gain on trading securities |
|
| (92) |
|
| — |
|
Asset write off |
|
| 13 |
|
| — |
|
Gain on reduction of asset retirement obligation |
|
| — |
|
| (56) |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
| (5,144) |
|
| (608) |
|
Stock compensation |
|
| 226 |
|
| 296 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in lease receivable |
|
| (167) |
|
| 683 |
|
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
| (10) |
|
| (142) |
|
Decrease in inventories |
|
| 13 |
|
| 3 |
|
Decrease (increase) in value added tax recoverable, net |
|
| 127 |
|
| (149) |
|
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue |
|
| (292) |
|
| 892 |
|
Increase (decrease) in reclamation liability |
|
| 24 |
|
| (8) |
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
| 236 |
|
| 226 |
|
Decrease in deferred leasehold payments |
|
| (34) |
|
| (23) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
| $ | (5,711) |
| $ | (1,630) |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
| | (in thousands) |
| ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (2,095) | | $ | (9,086) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 611 | |
| 962 | |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation | |
| 262 | |
| 249 | |
Decrease in derivative at fair value, net | | | — | | | 254 | |
Loss (gain) on trading securities | |
| 12 | |
| (20) | |
Write off of deferred financing costs | | | 352 | | | — | |
Asset write off | |
| — | |
| 100 | |
Gain on sale of assets | |
| (17) | |
| (525) | |
Stock compensation | |
| 1,593 | |
| 859 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities from continuing operations: | | | | | | | |
Decrease in lease receivable | | | — | | | 376 | |
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets | |
| 57 | |
| (506) | |
Increase in inventories | |
| (1,279) | |
| (53) | |
Increase in value added tax recoverable, net | |
| (1,245) | |
| — | |
Decrease (increase) in other long-term assets | |
| 373 | |
| (341) | |
Increase (decrease) in reclamation liability | |
| 33 | |
| (4) | |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | |
| 2,063 | |
| (810) | |
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities | | | 54 | | | (1,156) | |
Increase in deferred revenue | | | 948 | | | 63 | |
Decrease (increase) in other long-term liabilities | |
| (308) | |
| 154 | |
Net cash from (used in) operating activities | | $ | 1,414 | | $ | (9,484) | |
The Company did not make anyfollowing table sets forth supplemental cash payments for interest or income taxes during the years ended December 31, 2018flow information and 2017.non-cash transactions:
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2021 |
| 2020 |
| ||
| | (in thousands) |
| ||||
Supplemental disclosure: | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 8 | | $ | 96 | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | 150 | | $ | 284 | |
| | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions: | | | | | | | |
Deferred equity offering costs amortized | | $ | 57 | | $ | 32 | |
Deferred equity offering costs written off | | $ | 352 | | $ | 59 | |
19.Commitments and Contingenciesxxx
F-35
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
20. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Leases and Purchase Commitments
The Company has non-cancelable operating lease and other commitments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2021 |
| 2022 |
| 2023 |
| Thereafter |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2022 |
| 2023 |
| 2024 |
| 2025 |
| 2026 |
| Thereafter |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
El Quevar mining concessions (estimated) |
| $ | 60 |
| $ | 60 |
| $ | 60 |
| $ | 60 |
| $ | 60 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 7 | | $ | 7 | | $ | 7 | | $ | 7 | | $ | 7 | | $ | — | |
Velardeña mining concessions (estimated) |
| $ | 80 |
| $ | 80 |
| $ | 80 |
| $ | 80 |
| $ | 80 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 23 | | $ | 23 | | $ | 23 | | $ | 23 | | $ | 23 | | $ | — | |
Velardeña eajido and surface rights (estimated) | | $ | 56 | | $ | 56 | | $ | 56 | | $ | 56 | | $ | 56 | | $ | — | | |||||||||||||||||||
Rodeo mining concessions (estimated) | | $ | 35 | | $ | 35 | | $ | 35 | | $ | 35 | | $ | 35 | | $ | — | | |||||||||||||||||||
Rodeo eajido and surface rights (estimated) | | $ | 253 | | $ | 253 | | $ | 253 | | $ | 253 | | $ | 253 | | $ | — | | |||||||||||||||||||
Office space |
| $ | 224 |
| $ | 157 |
| $ | 160 |
| $ | 163 |
| $ | 166 |
| $ | 154 |
| | $ | 169 | | $ | 161 | | $ | 119 | | $ | 9 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
The Company is required to make payments to the Argentine government to maintain its rights to the El Quevar mining concessions. The Company has made such payments totaling approximately $57,000$9,000 and $111,000$22,000 for the years ended December 31, 20182021, and 2017,2020, respectively.
F-35
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The Company is required to pay concession holding fees to the Mexican government to maintain its rights to the Velardeña Properties and Rodeo property mining concessions. During the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 the Company made such payments totaling approximately $78,000$55,000 and $69,000 respectively,$52,000 respectively. Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company made annual payments to local ejidos and property owners under its surface right agreement withrights agreements for the local ejidoVelardeña Properties and Rodeo property of approximately $33,000.$109,000 and $131,000 respectively.
The Company has office leases for its corporate headquarters in Golden, Colorado, as well as for its Velardeña Properties offices in Mexico, and exploration offices in Mexico and Argentina. The lease for the corporate headquarters office space was renegotiated and extended during the first quarter 2019. The new lease reflects an approximately 45% reductionexpires in space and an approximately 45% reduction in cost beginning April 1, 2019. The new lease expires November 30, 2024.January 2025. Payments associated with the corporate headquarters lease were recorded to rent expense by the Company in the amounts of $237,000$175,000 and $226,000$177,000 for the years ended December 31, 20182021, and 2017,2020, respectively. The lease for the Mexican offices expires in October 2023. Payments associated with the Mexican office lease were recorded to rent expense by the Company in the amounts of $54,000 and $53,000 for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively. The lease for the Argentina office was renegotiated and extended during the fourth quarter 2021 and now expires in November 2024. Payments associated with the Argentina office lease were recorded to rent expense by the Company in the amounts of $10,000 and $9,000 for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
The Company cannot currently estimate the life of the Velardeña Properties or El Quevar project. The table above assumes that no annual maintenance payments will be made more than five years after December 31, 2018.2021. If the Company continues mining and processing at the Rodeo or evaluations of restart at the Velardeña Properties beyond five years, the Company expects that it would make annual maintenanceconcession and surface rights payments of approximately $80,000$79,000 per year for the life of the Velardeña mine and approximately $288,000 per year for the life of the Rodeo mine. If the Company continues to evaluate development opportunities at the El Quevar project, the Company expects that it would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $60,000$7,000 per year for the life of the El Quevar mine.
Payments associated with other exploration concessions the Company owns are not included because the Company has not completed exploration work on these concessions. Exploration success is historically low and the Company has the right to terminate the payments and release the concessions at any time.
F-36
ContingenciesGOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
No loss contingencies were recorded at(Expressed in United States dollars)
Contingencies
During April 2021, the Company became aware of a lawsuit in Mexico against one of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries, Minera William, S.A. de C.V. (“Minera William”). The plaintiff in the matter is Unifin Financiera, S.A.B de C.V. (“Unifin”). The lawsuit was assigned to the Fifth Specialized Commercial District Court. Although the Company has knowledge of the existence and content of the lawsuit filed by Unifin, the Court has not officially served Minera William with the complaint as of the date of this report. Unifin is alleging that a representative of Minera William signed certain documents in July 2011 purporting to bind Minera William as a guarantor of payment obligations owed by a third party to Unifin in connection with that third party’s acquisition of certain drilling equipment. At the time the documentation was allegedly signed, Minera Williams was a subsidiary of ECU Silver Mining prior to the Company’s acquisition of ECU in September 2011. As a preemptive measure, Unifin has obtained a preliminary court order freezing Minera William’s bank accounts in Mexico, which has limited the Company’s and Minera William’s ability to access approximately US$153,000 according to current currency exchange rates. Notwithstanding this action, the restrictions imposed on Minera Williams’ bank accounts do not impact the Company’s ability to operate the Rodeo mine, which is held through a different Mexico subsidiary, or continue with the Company’s evaluation plans for a potential Velardeña mine restart or move forward with any of the Company’s other exploration programs in Mexico. Unifin is seeking recovery for as much as US$12.5 million. The Company believes there is no basis for this claim and will defend itself if and when the Company is formally served with notice of the lawsuit. As such, the Company has not accrued an amount for this matter in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or Statements of Operations as of December 31, 2018 and2021.
At December 31, 2017.2020, the Company had 0 gain or loss contingencies.
21. | Foreign Currency |
20.Foreign Currency
The Company conducts exploration and mining activities primarily in Mexico and Argentina, and gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are related to those activities. The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar but certain transactions are conducted in the local currencies resulting in foreign currency transaction gains or losses.
22. | Segment Information |
21.Segment Information
The Company’s sole activity is the mining, construction and exploration of mineralmining properties containing precious metals. The Company’s reportable segments are based upon the Company’s revenue producing activities and cash consuming activities. The Company reports two2 segments, one1 for its revenue producing activities in Mexico, which includes both the Velardeña Properties in Mexicoand the Rodeo Property, and the other comprised of non-revenue producing activities, including exploration, construction and general and administrative activities. Intercompany revenue and expense amounts have been eliminated within each segment in order to report on
F-36
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
the basis that management uses internally for evaluating segment performance.
F-37
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
The financial information relating to the Company’s segments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Exploration, El |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quevar, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Costs |
| Depreciation, |
| Velardeña and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| Applicable |
| Depletion and |
| Administrative |
| Pre-Tax |
|
|
|
| Capital |
| |||||
The Year ended December 31, 2018 |
| Revenue |
| to Sales |
| Amortization |
| Expense |
| (Income)/Loss |
| Total Assets |
| Expenditures |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Velardeña Properties |
| $ | 7,217 |
| $ | 2,289 |
| $ | 816 |
| $ | 2,362 |
| $ | (1,320) |
| $ | 5,699 |
| $ | 79 |
|
Corporate, Exploration & Other |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 355 |
|
| 8,057 |
|
| 3,252 |
|
| 6,945 |
|
| 73 |
|
|
| $ | 7,217 |
| $ | 2,289 |
| $ | 1,171 |
| $ | 10,419 |
| $ | 1,932 |
| $ | 12,644 |
| $ | 152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Year ended December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Velardeña Properties |
| $ | 6,691 |
| $ | 2,189 |
| $ | 584 |
| $ | 2,089 |
| $ | (3,330) |
| $ | 6,406 |
| $ | 79 |
|
Corporate, Exploration & Other |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 368 |
|
| 6,925 |
|
| 7,209 |
|
| 6,671 |
|
| 2 |
|
|
| $ | 6,691 |
| $ | 2,189 |
| $ | 952 |
| $ | 9,014 |
| $ | 3,879 |
| $ | 13,077 |
| $ | 81 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Exploration, El |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | Quevar, | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | Costs | | Depreciation, | | Velardeña and | | | | | | | | | |
| |||
| | | | | Applicable | | Depletion and | | Administrative | | Pre-Tax | | | | | Capital |
| |||||
The Year ended December 31, 2021 | | Revenue | | to Sales | | Amortization | | Expense | | (Income)/Loss | | Total Assets | | Expenditures |
| |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Mexico Operations | | $ | 25,596 | | $ | 13,311 | | $ | 491 | | $ | 4,301 | | $ | (7,317) | | $ | 8,205 | | $ | 1,552 | |
Corporate, Exploration & Other | |
| — | |
| — | |
| 120 | |
| 7,532 | |
| 8,950 | |
| 15,473 | |
| 68 | |
| | $ | 25,596 | | $ | 13,311 | | $ | 611 | | $ | 11,833 | | $ | 1,633 | | $ | 23,678 | | $ | 1,620 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Year ended December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mexico Operations | | $ | 5,637 | | $ | 1,988 | | $ | 697 | | $ | 1,913 | | $ | (808) | | $ | 4,175 | | $ | 301 | |
Corporate, Exploration & Other | |
| — | |
| — | |
| 265 | |
| 8,473 | |
| 9,846 | |
| 14,131 | |
| 169 | |
| | $ | 5,637 | | $ | 1,988 | | $ | 962 | | $ | 10,386 | | $ | 9,038 | | $ | 18,306 | | $ | 470 | |
All of the revenueRevenue for the two years presentedyear ended December 31, 2021, was from the Company's Rodeo Property in Mexico (see Note 16) and was all attributable to the sale of gold and silver doré bars. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020 was from the Company's Velardeña Properties in Mexico (see Note 16)17) and was all attributable to the lease of the oxide plant.
23. | Related Party Transactions |
22.Related Party Transactions
The following sets forth information regarding transactions between the Company (and its subsidiaries) and its officers, directors and significant stockholders.
Sale of Equipment:Debt – Related Party
In August 2016,On March 30, 2020, in response to potential economic and market uncertainties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company soldentered into a Short-Term Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (“Sentient Global”), pursuant to which Sentient granted to the Company an unsecured loan in an amount equal to $1,000,000 (the “Sentient Loan”). Sentient Global is a private equity fund, and together with certain mining equipment to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary ofother Sentient for $687,000 (see Note 9), in a transaction approved byequity funds, is the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors. At December 31, 2018, Sentient, throughlargest stockholder, holding in the Sentient executive funds, holdsaggregate approximately 44%38% of the Company’s 95.6 million shares of issued and outstanding common stock. The equipment sold was excess equipment heldstock at the Company’s Velardeña Properties that the Company did not expect to use. The Company used a third party consultant with experience in the used mining equipment market in Mexico to determine a fair value. The Company believes the price paid was at least equal to the fair market valuedate of the equipmentLoan Agreement. The Sentient Loan had it been sold through auction or in the open market. The Company received 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale in August 2016, with the remainder, plusan interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, per annum and was due in February 2017.
Withfull, together with accrued interest and any other amount outstanding under the approval of a Special Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors,Loan Agreement, on December 31, 2020. On August 12, 2020, the Company and Minera Indé amendedrepaid the original equipment sale on March 31, 2017 to include the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000 and extend the time for payment relating to the original equipment sale. Upon execution of the amendment the Company received an additional payment of $100,000. The remaining principal and interest balance, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, was amended to be dueSentient Loan in August 2017. The Company recorded a gain of $105,000 on the sale of the additional equipment, included in “Other operating income”full in the accompanying Consolidated Statementsamount of Operationsapproximately $1,037,159 (including all accrued interest), with 0 prepayment penalty, and Comprehensive Loss, equal toterminated the gross proceeds less the remaining basis in the equipment. On May 2, 2017, the Company received approximately $750,000 from Minera Indé as payment in full for the remaining balance due related to the equipment sale, including interest through that date.Loan Agreement.
F-37
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Administrative Services:
Beginning inIn August 2016, the Company began providing limited accounting and other administrative services to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of Sentient. At December 31, 2021, Sentient, through the Sentient executive funds, held approximately 23% of the Company’s 162.5 million shares of issued and outstanding common stock. The administrative services are provided locally in Mexico by the administrative staff atin the Company’s Velardeña Properties.Mexico office. The Company charges Minera Indé $15,000 per month for the services, which provides reimbursement to the Company for its costs incurred plus a small profit margin. The Company also leases, from time to time, certain nonessential mining equipment to Minera Indé.
F-38
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
(Expressed in United States dollars)
Amounts received under the arrangement reduce costs incurred for the care and maintenance of the Velardeña Properties and allows the Company to maintain a larger more experienced staff at the Velardeña Properties to support the oxide plant lease and potential future mining or processing activities.exploration. The Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee approved the agreement. For the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 20172020, the Company charged Minera Indé approximately $180,000$263,000 and $230,000, respectively, for services and the use of equipment, offsetting costs that are recorded in “Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of OperationsOperations.
24. | Subsequent Events |
Subsequent to December 31, 2021, during January 2022, the Company granted 450,000 KELTIP units to a new officer and Comprehensive Loss.will recognize approximately $0.2 million of stock compensation expense related to the grant in the first quarter 2022.
F-38F-39